Skip to main content

AI assistant

Sign in to chat with this filing

The assistant answers questions, extracts KPIs, and summarises risk factors directly from the filing text.

Alkane Resources Capital/Financing Update 2020

Dec 15, 2020

48579_rns_2020-12-15_2ba41551-40fa-4698-be37-bf6ff26edee6.pdf

Capital/Financing Update

Open in viewer

Opens in your device viewer

ASX and MEDIA RELEASE

16 December 2020

==> picture [150 x 112] intentionally omitted <==

Resource Drilling Update for San Antonio

==> picture [20 x 14] intentionally omitted <==

The infill drilling of the San Antonio Inferred Resource is now complete, with final assays pending in January 2021. The drilling program comprised of 167 holes for a total of 37,000 metres.

==> picture [20 x 14] intentionally omitted <==

Assay results have been recently received for 51 drill holes, for a total of 10,600 metres. Latest significant intercepts for the San Antonio deposit include:

  • RWRC455 3.0 metres grading 5.12g/t Au from 75 metres; and 6.0 metres grading 5.46g/t Au from 158 metres; incl 1.0 metre grading 14.8g/t Au from 159 metres; and 52.0 metres grading 6.37g/t Au from 172 metres; incl 3.0 metres grading 58.3g/t Au from 175 metres. RWRC453 18.0 metres grading 2.73g/t Au from 119 metres; incl 2.0 metres grading 14.4g/t Au from 128 metres. RWRC447 23.0 metres grading 1.53g/t Au from 116 metres; incl 5.0 metres grading 4.00g/t Au from 119 metres; and 1.0 metre grading 7.56g/t Au from 151 metres. RWRC436 9.0 metres grading 2.62g/t Au from 35 metres; and 18.0 metres grading 1.28g/t Au from 55 metres. RWRC420 12.0 metres grading 3.17g/t Au from 260 metres; incl 2.0 metres grading 14.8g/t Au from 260 metres; and 6.0 metres grading 3.02g/t Au from 276 metres; incl 1.0 metre grading 12.6g/t Au from 279 metres; and 6.0 metres grading 1.93g/t Au from 292 metres. RWRC418 30.0 metres grading 1.45g/t Au from 115 metres; incl 7.0 metres grading 3.43g/t Au from 138 metres. RWRC400 6.0 metres grading 2.16g/t Au from 33 metres; and 15.0 metres grading 1.53g/t Au from 54 metres; and 6.0 metres grading 1.82g/t Au from 98 metres. RWRC388 21.0 metres grading 2.36g/t Au from 179 metres; incl 6.0 metres grading 5.61g/t Au from 187 metres.

==> picture [20 x 14] intentionally omitted <==

The San Antonio updated resource estimate will be released once the assay results are received, expected to be January 2021.

CONTACT : INVESTORS : MEDIA : JOHN GARDNER, CITADEL-MAGNUS, TEL +61 413 355 997

: NIC EARNER, MANAGING DIRECTOR, ALKANE RESOURCES LTD, TEL +61 8 9227 5677

: NATALIE CHAPMAN, CORPORATE COMMUNICATIONS MANAGER, TEL +61 418 642 556

Ground Floor, 89 Burswood Road, Burswood WA 6100, AUSTRALIA (PO Box 4384, Victoria Park WA 6979, AUSTRALIA) Telephone: +61 8 9227 5677 Facsimile: +61 8 9227 8178 www.alkane.com.au [email protected]

==> picture [57 x 26] intentionally omitted <==

Alkane Resources Limited (ASX: ALK) Managing Director, Nic Earner, said these latest intercepts from San Antonia demonstrate that, combined with Roswell, there is sufficient quality and scale to deliver a highgrade pit, close to surface, as the next phase of growth at the Tomingley Gold Project.

“These intercepts confirm we have further high-grade mineralisation close to the surface. Many of the latest intercepts suggest a possible improvement to the published resource model, which would certainly be pleasing. We look forward to bringing shareholders the indicated resource and mine plan soon into the New Year.”

Tomingley Gold Project

Alkane Resources Ltd 100%

The Tomingley Gold Project (TGP) in New South Wales covers an area of approximately 440km[2 ] stretching 60km north-south along the Newell Highway; from Tomingley in the north, through Peak Hill and almost to Parkes in the south. The TGP contains Alkane’s currently operating Tomingley Gold Operations (TGO), an open pit mine and underground operation with a 1Mtpa processing facility.

Over the past two years Alkane has conducted an extensive regional exploration program which led to the definition Resources at the Roswell and San Antonio prospects. These are:

  • Roswell Deposit: 10.1 Mt @ 2.04 g/t Au for 660 koz (Indicated + Inferred Mineral Resource – ASX Announcement 4 November 2020)

  • San Antonio Deposit: 7.92 Mt @ 1.78 g/t Au for 453 koz (Inferred Mineral Resource – ASX Announcement 20 April 2020)

Alkane has continued consultation with its key stakeholders, including landholders and regulators, in relation to development plans at the TGP. The Company has received approval to develop an exploration drive from the Wyoming One deposit to Roswell. Alkane has also prepared preliminary plans for both open-cut and underground mines beneath Roswell and San Antonio that it is using for consultation purposes as it seeks approval for mining development both underground and open cut (refer ASX Announcement 19 August 2020).

Detailed mine plans for Roswell are well progressed. Mine plans for San Antonio, to enable an economic assessment, will be prepared once the San Antonio Indicated Resource has been calculated. These plans are expected to be released in February 2021.

Geology

The Tomingley gold deposits are interpreted as orogenic gold systems positioned within a major structural zone. This style of deposit is well documented globally, with the more significant examples in Australia being the Archean greenstone belts of the Yilgarn Craton in Western Australia and the Paleozoic slate belts in Victoria.

The recent drilling at San Antonio has been infilling the defined Inferred Resources at a nominal 20m drill hole spacing over a strike length of 1,000m to facilitate definition to Indicated Resources and assist with the development of mining operations. The resource drilling is now completed, comprising 167 drill holes for a total of 37,016 metres. Recently received assay results, for 51 drill holes for a total of 10,600 metres, are detailed in Table 1 . A detailed surface plan and representative cross section with significant gold intercepts for San Antonio is included on pages 4 and 5.

Final assay results are not expected until mid-January 2021 due to the increase in exploration industry work schedules overloading laboratories. An updated resource estimation (Indicated and Inferred) for San Antonio is now anticipated to be released in late January 2021, along with preliminary mine plans for Roswell and San Antonio in February 2021. Drilling is continuing for the purpose of mine development studies including geotechnical, metallurgical, sterilisation and groundwater test work.

2/17

Alkane Resources Ltd – San Antonio Infill 16 December 2020

==> picture [57 x 26] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [468 x 689] intentionally omitted <==

3/17

Alkane Resources Ltd – San Antonio Infill 16 December 2020

==> picture [57 x 26] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [466 x 685] intentionally omitted <==

4/17

Alkane Resources Ltd – San Antonio Infill 16 December 2020

==> picture [57 x 26] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [466 x 623] intentionally omitted <==

5/17

Alkane Resources Ltd – San Antonio Infill 16 December 2020

==> picture [57 x 26] intentionally omitted <==

Table 1 - TOMINGLEY GOLD PROJECT RC AND DIAMOND DRILLING – December 2020 (>0.5g/t Au)

Table 1 - TOMINGLEY GOLD PROJECT RC AND DIAMOND DRILLING – December 2020(>0.5g/t Au) Table 1 - TOMINGLEY GOLD PROJECT RC AND DIAMOND DRILLING – December 2020(>0.5g/t Au) Table 1 - TOMINGLEY GOLD PROJECT RC AND DIAMOND DRILLING – December 2020(>0.5g/t Au) Table 1 - TOMINGLEY GOLD PROJECT RC AND DIAMOND DRILLING – December 2020(>0.5g/t Au) Table 1 - TOMINGLEY GOLD PROJECT RC AND DIAMOND DRILLING – December 2020(>0.5g/t Au) Table 1 - TOMINGLEY GOLD PROJECT RC AND DIAMOND DRILLING – December 2020(>0.5g/t Au) Table 1 - TOMINGLEY GOLD PROJECT RC AND DIAMOND DRILLING – December 2020(>0.5g/t Au) Table 1 - TOMINGLEY GOLD PROJECT RC AND DIAMOND DRILLING – December 2020(>0.5g/t Au) Table 1 - TOMINGLEY GOLD PROJECT RC AND DIAMOND DRILLING – December 2020(>0.5g/t Au) Table 1 - TOMINGLEY GOLD PROJECT RC AND DIAMOND DRILLING – December 2020(>0.5g/t Au) Table 1 - TOMINGLEY GOLD PROJECT RC AND DIAMOND DRILLING – December 2020(>0.5g/t Au) Table 1 - TOMINGLEY GOLD PROJECT RC AND DIAMOND DRILLING – December 2020(>0.5g/t Au)
Hole ID Easting Northing RL Dip Azimuth Total Interval Interval Intercept Au Prospect
(MGA) (MGA) (m) (Grid) Depth From(m) To(m) (m) (g/t)
RWD047 613801 6389597 266 -60 270 468.6 400.3 402 1.7 0.63 San Antonio
RWD049 613955 6390420 266 -60 270 450.6 330 331 1 1.31
and 347.3 348.2 0.9 1.00
and 364.1 366.4 2.3 0.61
and 402.3 403 0.7 1.26
RWRC385 613818 6390100 266 -61 270 202 197 201 4 1.77
incl 199 200 1 4.90
RWRC386 613793 6389817 267 -55 270 122* Hole abandoned early
RWRC387 613758 6389682 266 -60 270 264 136 141 5 2.64
incl 139 140 1 9.32
and 181 186 5 1.16
and 238 242 4 1.46
RWRC388 613737 6389926 267 -60 270 226 179 200 21 2.36
incl 187 193 6 5.61
and 208 209 1 0.55
RWRC389 613811 6390140 266 -60 270 232 No significant mineralisation
RWRC390 613809 6389952 266 -58 270 100* Hole abandoned early
RWRC400 613795 6390290 266 -50 277 136 33 39 6 2.16
and 54 69 15 1.53
incl 66 69 3 3.27
and 88 92 4 1.00
and 98 104 6 1.82
and 109 110 1 0.60
RWRC401 613805 6390290 266 -58 280 154 45 57 12 0.71
and 66 72 6 3.40
and 86 89 3 1.80
and 94 100 6 0.95
and 103 112 9 0.58
and 136 140 4 0.73
RWRC402 613820 6390280 266 -60 278 214 79 87 8 0.67
and 100 106 6 0.77
and 111 112 1 0.83
and 160 164 4 0.63
RWRC403 613910 6390265 266 -60 277 293 120 123 3 0.61
and 255 262 7 1.55
incl 255 256 1 7.24
and 291 292 1 0.87
RWRC404D 613950 6390300 266 -60 270 457.44 325.7 330 4.3 0.90
and 379 380.7 1.7 1.34
RWRC405 613732 6390049 266 -60 276 210 151 152 1 0.92
RWRC406 613710 6389959 266 -58 270 172 135 138 3 1.97
incl 136 137 1 4.79
and 150 157 7 1.79
RWRC407 613736 6390038 266 -60 270 184 155 157 2 0.79
and 160 171 11 1.06

6/17

Alkane Resources Ltd – San Antonio Infill 16 December 2020

==> picture [57 x 26] intentionally omitted <==

Table 1 - TOMINGLEY GOLD PROJECT RC AND DIAMOND DRILLING – December 2020 (>0.5g/t Au)

Table 1 - TOMINGLEY GOLD PROJECT RC AND DIAMOND DRILLING – December 2020(>0.5g/t Au) Table 1 - TOMINGLEY GOLD PROJECT RC AND DIAMOND DRILLING – December 2020(>0.5g/t Au) Table 1 - TOMINGLEY GOLD PROJECT RC AND DIAMOND DRILLING – December 2020(>0.5g/t Au) Table 1 - TOMINGLEY GOLD PROJECT RC AND DIAMOND DRILLING – December 2020(>0.5g/t Au) Table 1 - TOMINGLEY GOLD PROJECT RC AND DIAMOND DRILLING – December 2020(>0.5g/t Au) Table 1 - TOMINGLEY GOLD PROJECT RC AND DIAMOND DRILLING – December 2020(>0.5g/t Au) Table 1 - TOMINGLEY GOLD PROJECT RC AND DIAMOND DRILLING – December 2020(>0.5g/t Au) Table 1 - TOMINGLEY GOLD PROJECT RC AND DIAMOND DRILLING – December 2020(>0.5g/t Au) Table 1 - TOMINGLEY GOLD PROJECT RC AND DIAMOND DRILLING – December 2020(>0.5g/t Au) Table 1 - TOMINGLEY GOLD PROJECT RC AND DIAMOND DRILLING – December 2020(>0.5g/t Au) Table 1 - TOMINGLEY GOLD PROJECT RC AND DIAMOND DRILLING – December 2020(>0.5g/t Au) Table 1 - TOMINGLEY GOLD PROJECT RC AND DIAMOND DRILLING – December 2020(>0.5g/t Au)
Hole ID Easting Northing RL Dip Azimuth Total Interval Interval Intercept Au Prospect
(MGA) (MGA) (m) (Grid) Depth From(m) To(m) (m) (g/t)
RWRC409 613794 6389864 267 -58 270 250 No significant mineralisation San Antonio
RWRC412 613649 6389516 266 -60 272 200 159 160 1 1.25
and 167 168 1 1.40
RWRC413 613654 6389542 266 -58 270 232 165 180 15 0.82
incl 177 179 2 2.17
RWRC415 613688 6389562 266 -60 272 214* Hole abandoned early
RWRC416 613731 6389648 266 -58 272 256 51 54 3 0.53
and 130 132 2 0.50
and 168 171 3 2.31
and 224 226 2 0.52
and 230 231 1 0.56
RWRC417 613737 6389811 266 -58 270 154 118 122 4 0.91
and 126 129 3 2.75
RWRC418 613739 6389743 266 -58 270 190 115 145 30 1.45
incl 138 145 7 3.43
and 161 165 4 1.56
RWRC419 613766 6390115 266 -58 275 154 36** 72 36 0.89
RWRC420 613781 6389969 266 -58 274 310 260 272 12 3.17
incl 260 262 2 14.8
and 276 282 6 3.02
incl 279 280 1 12.6
and 288 289 1 0.84
and 292 298 6 1.93
incl 295 296 1 5.31
RWRC421 613870 6390400 266 -60 272 160* Hole abandoned early
RWRC422 613867 6390400 266 -58 270 280 165 168 3 2.59
incl 166 167 1 6.00
and 238 239 1 0.57
RWRC423 613854 6390099 267 -60 270 127* Hole abandoned early
RWRC424 613835 6390180 266 -60 270 178 42 48 6 2.60
and 125 129 4 4.49
incl 126 127 1 12.9
and 160 164 4 0.65
and 168 172 4 0.51
RWRC425 613759 6390100 266 -58 272 180 48** 60 12 0.81
and 66 78 12 0.82
RWRC426 613800 6389945 266 -56 270 300 274 275 1 0.85
and 281 283 2 2.69
RWRC427 613865 6389920 266 -60 270 322 259 260 1 0.95
and 281 282 1 0.67
and 314 315 1 0.56
RWRC430 6389963 613723 266 -50 270 154 113 118 5 0.88
and 124 129 5 0.52
and 133 136 3 0.63
and 141 142 1 1.00

7/17

Alkane Resources Ltd – San Antonio Infill 16 December 2020

==> picture [57 x 26] intentionally omitted <==

Table 1 - TOMINGLEY GOLD PROJECT RC AND DIAMOND DRILLING – December 2020 (>0.5g/t Au)

Table 1 - TOMINGLEY GOLD PROJECT RC AND DIAMOND DRILLING – December 2020(>0.5g/t Au) Table 1 - TOMINGLEY GOLD PROJECT RC AND DIAMOND DRILLING – December 2020(>0.5g/t Au) Table 1 - TOMINGLEY GOLD PROJECT RC AND DIAMOND DRILLING – December 2020(>0.5g/t Au) Table 1 - TOMINGLEY GOLD PROJECT RC AND DIAMOND DRILLING – December 2020(>0.5g/t Au) Table 1 - TOMINGLEY GOLD PROJECT RC AND DIAMOND DRILLING – December 2020(>0.5g/t Au) Table 1 - TOMINGLEY GOLD PROJECT RC AND DIAMOND DRILLING – December 2020(>0.5g/t Au) Table 1 - TOMINGLEY GOLD PROJECT RC AND DIAMOND DRILLING – December 2020(>0.5g/t Au) Table 1 - TOMINGLEY GOLD PROJECT RC AND DIAMOND DRILLING – December 2020(>0.5g/t Au) Table 1 - TOMINGLEY GOLD PROJECT RC AND DIAMOND DRILLING – December 2020(>0.5g/t Au) Table 1 - TOMINGLEY GOLD PROJECT RC AND DIAMOND DRILLING – December 2020(>0.5g/t Au) Table 1 - TOMINGLEY GOLD PROJECT RC AND DIAMOND DRILLING – December 2020(>0.5g/t Au) Table 1 - TOMINGLEY GOLD PROJECT RC AND DIAMOND DRILLING – December 2020(>0.5g/t Au)
Hole ID Easting Northing RL Dip Azimuth Total Interval Interval Intercept Au Prospect
(MGA) (MGA) (m) (Grid) Depth From(m) To(m) (m) (g/t)
RWRC432 613728 6390040 266 -50 270 140.5 63** 72 9 0.54 San Antonio
and 120 136 16 0.71
RWRC435 613745 6390020 266 -58 270 26* Hole abandoned early
RWRC436 613760 6390157 266 -50 274 148 35 44 9 2.62
and 55 73 18 1.28
incl 55 56 1 4.22
also 62 64 2 3.99
RWRC437 613710 6390000 266 -56 270 154 75 85 10 0.64
and 95 97 2 0.73
and 110 112 2 1.66
and 125 129 4 1.05
and 134 136 2 4.75
RWRC438 613705 6390000 266 -47 270 148 100 107 7 0.73
and 114 115 1 0.57
RWRC440 613740 6389840 266 -58 270 124 No significant mineralisation
RWRC441 613755 6389860 266 -61 270 142 No significant mineralisation
RWRC442 613750 6389882 266 -65 275 214 No significant mineralisation
RWRC443 613690 6389922 266 -49 270 166 75** 78 3 0.67
and 80 81 1 0.59
and 96 98 2 3.13
and 101 105 4 1.79
and 121 124 3 1.39
and 142 147 5 0.88
RWRC444 613700 6389960 266 -54 270 184 75** 78 3 0.69
and 83 84 1 0.52
and 95 97 2 0.84
and 105 112 7 1.22
and 116 117 1 0.69
and 125 126 1 4.22
and 140 141 1 0.56
and 143 153 10 1.70
incl 146 151 5 2.95
RWRC445 613695 6389960 266 -46 270 160 96 99 3 0.98
and 118 121 3 1.42
RWRC446 613695 6389980 266 -48 270 172 94 102 8 1.34
incl 97 100 3 2.44
and 106 108 2 0.81
RWRC447 613705 6389980 266 -56 270 196 116 139 23 1.53
incl 119 124 5 4.00
also 132 133 1 5.04
and 151 152 1 7.56
RWRC448 613820 6390125 266 -60 267 232 No significant mineralisation
RWRC452 613575 6389540 266 -49 270 124 No significant mineralisation
RWRC453 613630 6389580 266 -59 270 202 119 137 18 2.73
incl 128 130 2 14.4

8/17

Alkane Resources Ltd – San Antonio Infill 16 December 2020

==> picture [57 x 26] intentionally omitted <==

Table 1 - TOMINGLEY Table 1 - TOMINGLEY Table 1 - TOMINGLEY GOLD PROJECT RC AND DIAMOND DRILLING – December 2020(>0.5g/t Au) PROJECT RC AND DIAMOND DRILLING – December 2020(>0.5g/t Au) PROJECT RC AND DIAMOND DRILLING – December 2020(>0.5g/t Au) PROJECT RC AND DIAMOND DRILLING – December 2020(>0.5g/t Au) PROJECT RC AND DIAMOND DRILLING – December 2020(>0.5g/t Au) PROJECT RC AND DIAMOND DRILLING – December 2020(>0.5g/t Au) PROJECT RC AND DIAMOND DRILLING – December 2020(>0.5g/t Au) PROJECT RC AND DIAMOND DRILLING – December 2020(>0.5g/t Au)
Hole ID Easting Northing RL Dip Azimuth Total Interval Interval Intercept Au Prospect
(MGA) (MGA) (m) (Grid) Depth From(m) To(m) (m) (g/t)
and 179 180 1 2.12 San Antonio
RWRC454 613860 6389780 266 -60 270 310 No significant mineralisation
RWRC455 613882 6390300 267 -59 270 298 75 78 3 5.12
and 158 164 6 5.46
incl 159 160 1 14.8
and 172 224 52 6.37
incl 175 178 3 58.3
and 230 233 3 0.55
and 236 237 1 0.51
  • hole abandoned early. ** From base of alluvium. Gold intercepts calculated using a lower cut of 0.25g/t. True widths are approximately 60%.

9/17

Alkane Resources Ltd – San Antonio Infill 16 December 2020

==> picture [57 x 26] intentionally omitted <==

Competent Person

Unless otherwise advised above, the information in this report that relates to exploration results and mineral resources being reported for the first time is based on information compiled by Mr David Meates MAIG, (Alkane Exploration Manager NSW) who has sufficient experience which is relevant to the style of mineralisation and type of deposit under consideration and to the activity which he is undertaking to qualify as a Competent Person as defined in the 2012 Edition of the Australasian Code for Reporting of Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves. Mr Meates has provided his prior written consent to the inclusion in this report of the matters based on his information in the form and context in which it appears. Mr Meates is a shareholder in Alkane Resources Limited.

The information in this report that relates to previously reported exploration results and mineral resources is extracted from the Company’s ASX announcements noted in the text of the announcement and are available to view on the Company’s website. The Company confirms that it is not aware of any new information or data that materially affects the information included in the original announcements and in the case of estimates of Mineral Resources, that all material assumptions and technical parameters underpinning the estimates in the relevant market announcement continue to apply and have not materially change. The form and context in which the Competent Person’s findings are presented have not been materially altered.

Disclaimer

This report contains certain forward looking statements and forecasts, including possible or assumed reserves and resources, production levels and rates, costs, prices, future performance or potential growth of Alkane Resources Ltd, industry growth or other trend projections. Such statements are not a guarantee of future performance and involve unknown risks and uncertainties, as well as other factors which are beyond the control of Alkane Resources Ltd. Actual results and developments may differ materially from those expressed or implied by these forward looking statements depending on a variety of factors. Nothing in this report should be construed as either an offer to sell or a solicitation of an offer to buy or sell securities.

This document has been prepared in accordance with the requirements of Australian securities laws, which may differ from the requirements of United States and other country securities laws. Unless otherwise indicated, all ore reserve and mineral resource estimates included or incorporated by reference in this document have been, and will be, prepared in accordance with the JORC classification system of the Australasian Institute of Mining, and Metallurgy and Australian Institute of Geoscientists.

This document has been authorised for release to the market by Nic Earner, Managing Director.

ABOUT ALKANE ‐ www.alkane.com.auASX: ALK and OTCQX: ANLKY

10/17

Alkane Resources Ltd – San Antonio Infill 16 December 2020

==> picture [57 x 26] intentionally omitted <==

Alkane Resources is poised to become Australia’s next multi-mine gold producer.

The Company’s current gold production is from the Tomingley Gold Operations in Central West New South Wales, where it has been operating since 2014 and is currently expediting a development pathway to extend the mine’s underground and open pit potential.

Alkane has an enviable exploration track record and controls several highly prospective gold and copper tenements. Its most advanced exploration projects are in the tenement area between Tomingley and Peak Hill, which have the potential to provide additional ore for Tomingley’s operations.

Alkane’s exploration success includes the landmark porphyry gold-copper mineralisation discovery at Boda in 2019. With a major drill program ongoing at Boda throughout FY2021, Alkane is confident of further consolidating Central West New South Wales’ reputation as a significant gold production region.

Alkane’s gold interests extend throughout Australia, with strategic investments in other gold exploration and aspiring mining companies, including ~19.9% of Genesis Minerals (ASX: GMD) and ~10.7% of Calidus Resources (ASX: CAI).

==> picture [228 x 336] intentionally omitted <==

11/17

Alkane Resources Ltd – San Antonio Infill 16 December 2020

==> picture [58 x 26] intentionally omitted <==

The following tables are provided to ensure compliance with the JORC Code (2012) edition requirements for the reporting of exploration results.

APPENDIX 1

JORC Code, 2012 Edition – Table 1 report – San Antonio – December 2020 Section 1 Sampling Techniques and Data

(Criteria in this section apply to all succeeding sections.)

Criteria JORC Code explanation Commentary
Sampling
techniques

Nature and quality of sampling (eg cut channels, random chips, or specific specialised
industry standard measurement tools appropriate to the minerals under investigation,
such as down hole gamma sondes, or handheld XRF instruments, etc). These
examples should not be taken as limiting the broad meaning of sampling.
RC samples are collected at one metre intervals via a cyclone on the rig. The cyclone is cleaned
regularly to minimise any contamination.
Half core samples are collected at generally one metre intervals.

Include reference to measures taken to ensure sample representivity and the
appropriate calibration of any measurement tools or systems used.
Drilling, sampling and QAQC procedures are carried out to industry standards.

Aspects of the determination of mineralisation that are Material to the Public Report. In
cases where ‘industry standard’ work has been done this would be relatively simple (eg
‘reverse circulation drilling was used to obtain 1 m samples from which 3 kg was
pulverised to produce a 30 g charge for fire assay’). In other cases more explanation
may be required, such as where there is coarse gold that has inherent sampling
problems. Unusual commodities or mineralisation types (eg submarine nodules) may
warrant disclosure of detailed information.
RC Drilling – the total sample (~20-30kg) is delivered via cyclone into a large plastic bag which is
retained for future use if required. A sub-sample of approximately 1kg is spear sampled from each
plastic bag and composited to make a 3 metres sample interval. If strong mineralisation is
observed by the site geologist this is sampled as a final 1m interval instead. The 1m intervals
forming composite samples assaying ≥0.20 g/t Au or with high As are resplit using a cone splitter on
the rig into a separate calico at the time of drilling and re-submitted to the laboratory for re-assay.
Core is cut in half using a Corewise automatic diamond cutting saw.
All samples sent to laboratory are crushed and/or pulverised to produce a ~100g pulp for the assay
process.
Gold was determined by fire assay fusion of a 50g charge with an AAS analytical finish.
A multi-element suite was determined using an aqua regia or multi-acid digest with an AES, MS
analytical finish.
Drilling
techniques

Drill type (eg core, reverse circulation, open-hole hammer, rotary air blast, auger,
Bangka, sonic, etc) and details (eg core diameter, triple or standard tube, depth of
diamond tails, face-sampling bit or other type, whether core is oriented and if so, by
what method, etc).
Reverse circulation (RC) drilling using 110mm rods 144mm face sampling hammer.
Core drilling completed as an HQ tail on RC precollar. Core orientated using a Reflex tool.
Drill sample
recovery

Method of recording and assessing core and chip sample recoveries and results
assessed.
RC - sample recovery is visually estimated and generally very good (>90%) aided by the use of
oversized shrouds through oxide material. Samples are even sized. Samples are occasionally damp
or wet in RC holes drilled below 250 metres. Sample quality is assessed by the sampler by visual
approximation of sample recovery and if the sample is dry, damp or wet. Riffle and cone splitters
were used to ensure a representative sample was achieved on all 1 metre samples.

12/17

Alkane Resources Ltd – San Antonio Infill 16 December 2020

==> picture [58 x 26] intentionally omitted <==

Criteria JORC Code explanation Commentary
DD - core loss is identified by drillers and calculated by geologists when logging. Generally ≥99%
was recovered.

Measures taken to maximise sample recovery and ensure representative nature of the
samples.
RC drilling completed using oversized shrouds to maintain sample return in oxide zone and all samples
are split using riffle or cone splitters. Use of RC rigs with high air capacity assists in keeping samples dry.
Triple tube coring is used at all times to maximise core recovery.

Whether a relationship exists between sample recovery and grade and whether sample
bias may have occurred due to preferential loss/gain of fine/coarse material.
There is no known relationship between sample recovery and grade.
Logging
Whether core and chip samples have been geologically and geotechnically logged to a
level of detail to support appropriate Mineral Resource estimation, mining studies and
metallurgical studies.
RC - each one metre interval is geologically logged for characteristics such as lithology,
weathering, alteration (type, character and intensity), veining (type, character and
intensity) and mineralisation (type, character and volume percentage).
DD - all core is laid out in core trays and geologically logged for characteristics such as lithology,
weathering, alteration (type, character and intensity), veining (type, character and
intensity) and mineralisation (type, character and volume percentage). A detailed
geotechnical log is also undertaken collecting parameters such as core recovery, RQD,
fracture count, and fracture type and orientation.

Whether logging is qualitative or quantitative in nature. Core (or costean, channel, etc)
photography.
All logging is qualitative with visual estimates of the various characteristics.
RC - A representative sample of each one metre interval is retained in chip trays for future
reference.
DD - Core is photographed and all unsampled core is retained for reference purposes.

The total length and percentage of the relevant intersections logged.
All DD core and RC chip samples have been geologically and geotechnically logged by qualified
geologists.
Sub-sampling
techniques and
sample
preparation

If core, whether cut or sawn and whether quarter, half or all core taken.
DD - zones of visual mineralisation and/or alteration are marked up by the geologist and cut in half
using a Corewise automatic core cutting saw. The right half is sampled to sampling intervals that
are generally based on geology but do not exceed 1.3 metres in length. The left half is archived. All
mineralised zones are sampled, plus >5m of visibly barren wall rock.
Laboratory Preparation – drill core is oven dried prior to crushing to <6mm using a jaw crusher,
split to 3kg if required then pulverised in an LM5 (or equivalent) to ≥85% passing 75µm. Bulk
rejects for all samples are discarded. A pulp packet (±100g) is stored for future reference.

If non-core, whether riffled, tube sampled, rotary split, etc and whether sampled wet or
dry.
RC - for each one metre interval with visual mineralisation and/or alteration the calico sample bag
is numbered and submitted to the laboratory for analysis. Intervals without visual mineralisation
and/or alteration are spear sampled and composited over three metres. Damp or wet samples are
recorded by the sampler. For composited intervals returning grades >0.2g/t Au the calico bags are
retrieved for assay.
Laboratory Preparation – the entire RC sample (3kg) is dried and pulverised in an LM5 (or equivalent)
to ≥85% passing 75µm. Bulk rejects for all samples are discarded. A pulp packet (±100g) is stored
for future reference.

For all sample types, the nature, quality and appropriateness of the sample preparation
ALK sampling techniques are of industry standard and considered adequate.

13/17

Alkane Resources Ltd – San Antonio Infill 16 December 2020

==> picture [58 x 26] intentionally omitted <==

Criteria
JORC Code explanation
Criteria
JORC Code explanation
Commentary
technique.

Quality control procedures adopted for all sub-sampling stages to maximise
representivity of samples.
RC - field duplicate samples collected at every stage of sampling to control procedures.
DD - external laboratory duplicates used.

Measures taken to ensure that the sampling is representative of the in situ material
collected, including for instance results for field duplicate/second-half sampling.
RC - Duplicate samples are riffle split from the riffle/conical split calico from the drill rig. Duplicates
show generally excellent repeatability, indicating a negligible “nugget” effect.

Whether sample sizes are appropriate to the grain size of the material being sampled.
Sample sizes are assumed to be within industry standard and considered appropriate.
Quality of
assay data and
laboratory tests

The nature, quality and appropriateness of the assaying and laboratory procedures
used and whether the technique is considered partial or total.
Gold is determined using a 50g charge fused at approximately 1100°C with alkaline fluxes, including
lead oxide. The resultant prill is dissolved in aqua regia and gold determined by flame AAS.
For other geochemical elements samples are digested in either aqua regia or a multi-acid digest with
each element concentration determined by ICP Atomic Emission Spectrometry or ICP Mass
Spectrometry. These additional elements are generally only used for geological interpretation
purposes, are not of economic significance and are not routinely reported.

For geophysical tools, spectrometers, handheld XRF instruments, etc, the parameters
used in determining the analysis including instrument make and model, reading times,
calibrations factors applied and their derivation, etc.
Not applicable to this report or deposit.

Nature of quality control procedures adopted (eg standards, blanks, duplicates,
external laboratory checks) and whether acceptable levels of accuracy (ie lack of bias)
and precision have been established.
Commercially prepared Certified Reference Materials (CRM) are inserted at 1 in 20 samples. CRM’s
are not identifiable to the laboratory.
Field duplicate samples are inserted at 1 in 20 samples (alternate to CRM’s).
Laboratory QAQC sampling includes insertion of CRM samples, internal duplicates and screen tests.
This data is reported for each sample submission.
Failed standards result in re-assaying of portions of the affected sample batches.
Verification of
sampling and
assaying

The verification of significant intersections by either independent or alternative
company personnel.
Drill data is compiled and collated, and reviewed by senior exploration staff. Tomingley Gold Mine
staff review resource estimation procedures.

The use of twinned holes.
Twinned holes have not been drilled.

Documentation of primary data, data entry procedures, data verification, data storage
(physical and electronic) protocols.
All drill hole logging and sampling data is hard keyed into excel spreadsheet for transfer and
storage in an access database with verification protocols in place.
All primary assay data is received from the laboratory as electronic data files which are imported
into sampling database with verification procedures in place. QAQC analysis is undertaken for each
laboratory report.
Digital copies of Certificates of Analysis (COA) are stored in a central database with regular (daily)
backup.
Data is also verified on import into mining related software.

Discuss any adjustment to assay data.
No assay data was adjusted. In the case of assay checks the original assay is utilised as there was no
statistical variability.

14/17

Alkane Resources Ltd – San Antonio Infill 16 December 2020

==> picture [58 x 26] intentionally omitted <==

Criteria
JORC Code explanation
Criteria
JORC Code explanation
Commentary
Location of
data points

Accuracy and quality of surveys used to locate drill holes (collar and down-hole
surveys), trenches, mine workings and other locations used in Mineral Resource
estimation.
Drill holes are laid out using hand held GPS (accuracy ± 2m) then surveyed accurately (± 0.1m) by
Tomingley Gold Operations trained surveyors on completion.
RC drill holes are surveyed using a single shot electronic camera at a nominal 30m down hole
interval.
DD are surveyed at nominal 30m down hole during drilling to maintain drilling direction and then at
6m intervals on retrieval of rod string using a multi shot electronic camera.

Specification of the grid system used.
MGA94 grid system was used.

Quality and adequacy of topographic control.
A site based digital terrain model was developed from accurate (± 0.1m) survey control by licenced
surveyors.
Data spacing
and distribution

Data spacing for reporting of Exploration Results.
Nominal drill hole spacing is 20m x 20m for Roswell and San Antonio deposits.
For regional exploration drilling the drill hole spacing is variable as the focus is on geological
mapping and identifying new zones of mineralisation.

Whether the data spacing and distribution is sufficient to establish the degree of
geological and grade continuity appropriate for the Mineral Resource and Ore Reserve
estimation procedure(s) and classifications applied.
The drill hole spacing has been shown to be appropriate to demonstrate spatial and grade continuity
of the mineralised domains to support the definition of Inferred Mineral Resources under the 2012
JORC code once all other modifying factors have been addressed.

Whether sample compositing has been applied.
RC – samples with no visible mineralisation or alteration are composited to 3m with 1m resamples
assayed if the composite returned a gold value of >0.2g/t gold. One metre samples override 3m
composites in the database.
DD – core is sampled togeology
Orientation of
data in relation
to geological
structure

Whether the orientation of sampling achieves unbiased sampling of possible structures
and the extent to which this is known, considering the deposit type.
Much care is given to attempt to intersect structure at an optimal angle but in complex ore bodies
this can be difficult.

If the relationship between the drilling orientation and the orientation of key mineralised
structures is considered to have introduced a sampling bias, this should be assessed
and reported if material.
It is not thought that drilling direction will bias assay data significantly.
Sample
security

The measures taken to ensure sample security.
All samples are bagged in tied numbered calico bags, grouped into larger tied polyweave bags and
transported 5 minutes away to Tomingley Gold Mine. The samples are placed in large sample
cages with a sample submission sheet and couriered to ALS in Orange via freight truck. All sample
submissions are documented via ALS tracking system and all assays are reported via email.
Sample pulps are returned to site and stored for an appropriate length of time (minimum 3 years).
The Company has in place protocols to ensure data security.
Audits or
reviews

The results of any audits or reviews of sampling techniques and data.
The Company does not routinely have external consultants verify exploration data until resource
estimation procedures are deemed necessary.

15/17

Alkane Resources Ltd – San Antonio Infill 16 December 2020

==> picture [58 x 26] intentionally omitted <==

Section 2 Reporting of Exploration Results

(Criteria listed in the preceding section also apply to this section.)

Criteria JORC Code explanation Commentary
Mineral
tenement and
land tenure
status

Type, reference name/number, location and ownership including agreements or
material issues with third parties such as joint ventures, partnerships, overriding
royalties, native title interests, historical sites, wilderness or national park and
environmental settings.
EL5675 wholly owned by Alkane Resources Ltd (ALK).

The security of the tenure held at the time of reporting along with any known
impediments to obtaining a licence to operate in the area.
EL5675 is due to expire 17 January 2023.
Exploration
done by other
parties

Acknowledgment and appraisal of exploration by other parties.
All reported drilling completed by ALK.
Geology
Deposit type, geological setting and style of mineralisation.
Mineralisation is similar to the well documented Tomingley Gold Deposits. Tomingley is associated
with quartz veining and alteration focused within andesite volcanics and adjacent volcaniclastic
sediments. The deposits appear to have formed as the result of a competency contrast between
the volcanics and the surrounding volcaniclastic sediments, with the volcanics showing brittle
fracture and the sediments ductile deformation, and have many similarities to well documented
orogenic - lode-style gold deposits.
Drill hole
Information

A summary of all information material to the understanding of the exploration results
including a tabulation of the following information for all Material drill holes:
o
easting and northing of the drill hole collar
o
elevation or RL (Reduced Level – elevation above sea level in metres) of the drill
hole collar
o
dip and azimuth of the hole
o
down hole length and interception depth
o
hole length.
See body of announcement and figures.

If the exclusion of this information is justified on the basis that the information is not
Material and this exclusion does not detract from the understanding of the report, the
Competent Person should clearly explain why this is the case.
All drilling reported for the San Antonio and Roswell deposits.
Data
aggregation
methods

In reporting Exploration Results, weighting averaging techniques, maximum and/or
minimum grade truncations (eg cutting of high grades) and cut-off grades are usually
Material and should be stated.
Exploration results reported –
for uncut gold grades;
grades are calculated by length weighted average.

Where aggregate intercepts incorporate short lengths of high grade results and longer
lengths of low grade results, the procedure used for such aggregation should be stated
Reported intercepts are calculated using a lower cut of 0.25g/t Au.
No top cut has been used.

16/17

Alkane Resources Ltd – San Antonio Infill 16 December 2020

==> picture [58 x 26] intentionally omitted <==

Criteria
JORC Code explanation
Criteria
JORC Code explanation
Commentary
and some typical examples of such aggregations should be shown in detail.

The assumptions used for any reporting of metal equivalent values should be clearly
stated.
No metal equivalents are reported.
Relationship
between
mineralisation
widths and
intercept
lengths

These relationships are particularly important in the reporting of Exploration Results.
o
If the geometry of the mineralisation with respect to the drill hole angle is known, its
nature should be reported.
o
If it is not known and only the down hole lengths are reported, there should be a
clear statement to this effect (eg ‘down hole length, true width not known’).
Previously reported exploration results include an estimate of true width. The mineralisation is
structurally complex and true widths are variable depending on the ore zone intersected however
average 60% of the drill intersection.
Diagrams
Appropriate maps and sections (with scales) and tabulations of intercepts should be
included for any significant discovery being reported These should include, but not be
limited to a plan view of drill hole collar locations and appropriate sectional views.
Plans and sections are included in the body of the announcement.
Balanced
reporting

Where comprehensive reporting of all Exploration Results is not practicable,
representative reporting of both low and high grades and/or widths should be practiced
to avoid misleading reporting of Exploration Results.
All completed drill holes are listed at the San Antonio and Roswell drilling with samples assaying
significant gold of ≥0.5g/t Au have been reported.
Other
substantive
exploration
data

Other exploration data, if meaningful and material, should be reported including (but
not limited to): geological observations; geophysical survey results; geochemical survey
results; bulk samples – size and method of treatment; metallurgical test results; bulk
density, groundwater, geotechnical and rock characteristics; potential deleterious or
contaminating substances.
No additional or new exploration data is being reported at this time.
Further work
The nature and scale of planned further work (eg tests for lateral extensions or depth
extensions or large-scale step-out drilling).
Additional drilling is underway to infill the drilling to 20m x 20m spacing to convert the Inferred
Resources to Indicated and Measured. Deep core drilling is also being planned to test the
continuation high grade mineralised structures at depth.
Additional regional exploration is being planned to test the El Paso and McLeans prospects.

Diagrams clearly highlighting the areas of possible extensions, including the main
geological interpretations and future drilling areas, provided this information is not
commercially sensitive.
See figures included in the announcement.

17/17

Alkane Resources Ltd – San Antonio Infill 16 December 2020