AI assistant
ALICE QUEEN LIMITED — Proxy Solicitation & Information Statement 2024
May 27, 2024
64409_rns_2024-05-27_4bd5924d-96db-4d64-bf1a-83e9daab67d6.pdf
Proxy Solicitation & Information Statement
Open in viewerOpens in your device viewer
ALICE QUEEN LIMITED ACN 099 247 408
NOTICE OF EXTRAORDINARY GENERAL MEETING
TIME : 1.00pm (AEST) DATE : 28 June 2024
PLACE : 454 Collins Street Melbourne, Victoria
An Independent Expert’s Report has been prepared by PKF Melbourne Corporate Pty Ltd in respect of the issue of Shares to Gage (and/or the Nominee) and the acquisition of a relevant interest by Gage (and, as applicable, the Nominee) in the issued voting Shares of the Company of, and the increase in the voting power of Gage (and, as applicable, the Nominee) from 18.67% to, 51% if Resolution 1 is approved.
The findings of PKF Melbourne Corporate Pty Ltd are that the issue of Shares to Gage (and/or the Nominee) pursuant to the Gage Subscription and the acquisition by Gage (and, as applicable, the Nominee) of a relevant interest in the voting Shares of the Company of, and the increase in the voting power of Gage (and, as applicable, the Nominee) from 18.67% to, 51% if Resolution 1 is approved is NOT FAIR BUT REASONABLE to the non-associated Shareholders of the Company.
The Independent Expert’s Report is set out in Annexure A to the Explanatory Statement. Shareholders should read the Notice and the Explanatory Statement (including the Annexures to the Explanatory Statement) in full. If you are in doubt as to the course you should follow, consult your financial or other professional advisor.
This Notice of Meeting and Explanatory Statement (including the Annexures to the Explanatory Statement) should be read in their entirety. Shareholders in doubt as to how they should vote should seek advice from their professional advisers prior to voting.
Should you wish to discuss the matters in this Notice of Meeting please do not hesitate to contact the Company Secretary on (+61 3) 8669 1408.
CONTENTS PAGE
| Business of the Meeting | 5 |
|---|---|
| Explanatory Statement | 6 |
| Glossary | 14 |
| Annexure A – Independent Expert’s Report | 16 |
| Annexure B – Summary of Material Terms of Subscription Agreement | 182 |
| Proxy Form | attached |
IMPORTANT INFORMATION
TIME AND PLACE OF MEETING
Notice is hereby given that the General Meeting ( Meeting ) of Shareholders of Alice Queen Limited ( Alice Queen or the Company ) will be held at 1.00pm AEST on 28 June 2024 at 454 Collins Street Melbourne, Victoria.
The Explanatory Statement that accompanies and forms part of this Notice of General Meeting ( Notice ) sets out the background information on the various matters to be considered. This Notice and Explanatory Statement should be read in their entirety.
YOUR VOTE IS IMPORTANT
The business of the Meeting affects your shareholding and your vote is important.
VOTING ELIGIBILITY
The Directors have determined pursuant to Regulation 7.11.37 of the Corporations Regulations 2001(Cth) that the persons eligible to vote at the Meeting are those who are registered Shareholders at 7:00 pm (AEST) on 26 June 2024.
VOTING IN PERSON
To vote in person, attend the Meeting at the time, date and place set out above.
VOTING BY PROXY
To vote by proxy, please complete and sign the enclosed Proxy Form and return by the time and in accordance with the instructions set out on the Proxy Form.
In accordance with section 249L of the Corporations Act , members are advised that:
-
each member has a right to appoint a proxy; and
-
the proxy need not be a member of the Company; and
-
a member who is entitled to cast 2 or more votes may appoint 2 proxies and may specify the proportion or number of votes each proxy is appointed to exercise. If the member appoints 2 proxies and the appointment does not specify the
2
proportion or number of the member’s votes, then in accordance with section 249X(3) of the Corporations Act, each proxy may exercise one-half of the votes.
A proxy may be an individual or a body corporate. If a body corporate is appointed, the proxy form must indicate the full name of the body corporate and the full name and title of the individual representative of the body corporate for the meeting.
A proxy form accompanies this notice. If a shareholder wishes to appoint more than 1 proxy, they may make a copy of the proxy form attached to this notice. For the proxy form to be valid it must be received together with the power of attorney or other authority (if any) under which the form is signed, or a (notarially) certified copy of that power or authority.
Sections 250BB and 250BC of the Corporations Act apply to voting by proxy. Broadly, these provisions provide that:
-
if proxy holders vote, they must cast all directed proxies as directed; and
-
any directed proxies which are not voted will automatically default to the Chair, who must vote the proxies as directed.
Proxy vote if appointment specifies way to vote
Section 250BB(1) of the Corporations Act provides that an appointment of a proxy may specify the way the proxy is to vote on a particular resolution and, if it does:
-
the proxy need not vote on a show of hands, but if the proxy does so, the proxy must vote that way (i.e. as directed); and
-
if the proxy has 2 or more appointments that specify different ways to vote on the resolution, the proxy must not vote on a show of hands; and
-
if the proxy is the Chair of the meeting at which the resolution is voted on, the proxy must vote on a poll, and must vote that way (i.e. as directed); and
-
if the proxy is not the Chair – the proxy need not vote on the poll, but if the proxy does so, the proxy must vote that way (i.e. as directed).
Transfer of non-Chair proxy to Chair in certain circumstances
Section 250BC of the Corporations Act provides that, if:
-
an appointment of a proxy specifies the way the proxy is to vote on a particular resolution at a meeting of the Company's members; and
-
the appointed proxy is not the Chair of the meeting; and
-
at the meeting, a poll is duly demanded on the resolution; and
-
either of the following applies:
-
the proxy is not recorded as attending the meeting; or
-
the proxy does not vote on the resolution,
the Chair of the meeting is taken, before voting on the resolution closes, to have been appointed as the proxy for the purposes of voting on the resolution at the meeting.
3
Proxy Voting by the Chair
Subject to any restrictions as set out in the Notice, the Chair intends to vote all available undirected proxies in favour of each item of business.
CORPORATE REPRESENTATIVES
Any corporation which is a member of the Company may appoint a proxy, as set out above, or authorise (by certificate under common seal or other form of execution authorised by the laws of that corporation’s place of incorporation, or in any other manner satisfactory to the Chair) a natural person to act as its representative at any general meeting.
Corporate representatives are requested to bring appropriate evidence of appointment as a representative in accordance with the Constitution. Attorneys are requested to bring an original or certified copy of the power of attorney pursuant to which they were appointed. Proof of identity is also required for corporate representatives and attorneys.
QUESTIONS FROM SHAREHOLDERS
The Chair will allow a reasonable opportunity for shareholders to ask questions or make comments at the Meeting. Members are requested to submit queries in writing to the Company Secretary by 24 June 2024 to enable the Board time to consider the queries.
By mail: Company Secretary Level 2, Rear 568 Chapel Street (Entrance Oxford Street) South Yarra Victoria 3141
By email: [email protected]
4
BUSINESS OF THE MEETING
AGENDA
RESOLUTION 1: APPROVAL FOR ACQUISITION OF A RELEVANT INTEREST
To consider and, if thought fit, to pass, with or without amendment, the following Resolution as an ordinary resolution :
“That, for the purposes of item 7 of section 611 of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) and for all other purposes, approval is given for the issue of 455,900,000 fully paid ordinary shares at an issue price of $0.008 (0.8 cents) per share to Gage (and/or the Nominee) and for the acquisition by Gage (and, as applicable, the Nominee) of a relevant interest in the issued voting shares in the Company of, and the increase in the voting power of Gage (and, as applicable, the Nominee) from 18.67% to, 51%, as described in the Explanatory Statement which accompanied and formed part of this Notice.”
Voting Prohibition
The Company will disregard any votes cast in favour of this Resolution by:
-
the persons proposing to make the acquisition and their associates; or
-
the persons (if any) from whom the acquisition is to be made and their associates.
Independent Expert’s Report
An Independent Expert’s Report has been prepared by PKF Melbourne Corporate Pty Ltd for the purposes of item 7 of section 611 of the Corporations Act. The Independent Expert’s Report is enclosed with this Notice as Annexure A to the Explanatory Statement.
PKF Melbourne Corporate Pty Ltd has concluded that the issue of Shares to Gage (and/or the Nominee) pursuant to the Gage Subscription and the acquisition by Gage (and, as applicable, the Nominee) of a relevant interest in the voting Shares of the Company of, and the increase in the voting power of Gage (and, as applicable, the Nominee) from 18.67% to, 51% if Resolution 1 is approved is not fair but reasonable to non-associated Shareholders.
Further details are set out in the Explanatory Statement (including the Annexures to the Explanatory Statement) which the Directors recommend that Shareholders read in full before making any decision in relation to voting on Resolution 1.
DATED: 28 MAY 2024
BY ORDER OF THE BOARD
ANNE ADALEY
COMPANY SECRETARY
5
EXPLANATORY STATEMENT
This Explanatory Statement has been prepared to provide information which the Directors believe to be material to Shareholders deciding whether or not to pass the Resolutions which are the subject of the business of the Meeting.
BACKGROUND TO RESOLUTION 1
Resolution 1 seeks shareholder approval, for the purposes of item 7 of Section 611 of the Corporations Act and for all other purposes, for the issue of 455,900,000 Shares to Gage Resource Development Pty Ltd [ACN 671 483 346] (Gage) (and/or the Nominee) and for Gage (and, as applicable, the Nominee) to acquire a relevant interest in the voting shares of the Company of, and the increase in the voting power of Gage (and, as applicable, the Nominee) from 18.67% to, 51%.
The Company strongly recommends that Shareholders read the Notice and this Explanatory Statement (including the Annexures to this Explanatory Statement) prior to determining how to vote on Resolution 1. Shareholders who do not understand the content of the Notice and/or the Explanatory Statement should consult their professional adviser.
The Gage Subscription
The Company and Gage have entered into the Subscription Agreement under which Gage agrees to make (directly and/or via the Nominee) the Gage Subscription by subscribing for 455,900,000 Shares at an issue price of $0.008 (0.8 cents) per Share to raise $3,647,200 before costs, on the terms and conditions of the Subscription Agreement. A summary of the material terms of the Subscription Agreement is set out in Annexure B to this Explanatory Statement.
As a term of the Gage Subscription, Gage has nominated Mr Wang Jianying (being the Nominee Director) to be appointed a Director with effect upon completion of the Gage Subscription. Further details with respect to the Nominee Director are set out below.
Acquisition of a relevant interest requiring approval under item 7 of section 611
Section 606 of the Corporations Act prohibits a person from acquiring a relevant interest in the issued voting shares of a listed company if the acquisition would result in that person or someone else’s voting power increasing from 20% or below to more than 20% or increasing from a starting point that is above 20% and below 90%.
The prohibition in section 606 of the Corporations Act is subject to exceptions contained in section 611 of the Corporations Act. Item 7 of section 611 of the Corporations Act provides that specific shareholder approval may be sought for the acquisition of a relevant interest in securities which would otherwise contravene section 606 of the Corporations Act.
At the date of the Notice, Gage has a relevant interest in 128,977,226 Shares (18.67% of the voting Shares of the Company). Following completion of the Gage Subscription, Gage (and, as applicable, the Nominee) will have a relevant interest in 584,877,226 Shares which will equate to 51% of the issued voting Shares of the Company on a post-issue basis. An example of the Share capital structure following completion of the Gage Subscription is set out below.
Noting the above, the Company is seeking shareholder approval pursuant to Resolution 1 of the Notice for the purposes of item 7 of section 611 of the Corporations Act for the issue of 455,900,000 Shares to Gage (and/or the Nominee) pursuant to the Gage Subscription
6
and the increase by Gage (and, as applicable, the Nominee) of its relevant interest in the voting Shares of the Company from below 20% to more than 20% (51%) as a result of the acquisition of the Shares issued under the Gage Subscription. Shareholder approval of Resolution 1 is a condition precedent to the Gage Subscription proceeding and accordingly, if Shareholders do not approve Resolution 1 then the Gage Subscription will not proceed. If Shareholders approve Resolution 1 then the Gage Subscription will proceed, subject to the other conditions being satisfied. Details of the conditions of the Gage Subscription form part of the summary of the material terms of the Subscription Agreement that is set out in Annexure B to this Explanatory Statement.
Independent Expert’s Report
An Independent Expert’s Report has been prepared by PKF Corporate in connection with Resolution 1 for the purposes of item 7 of section 611 of the Corporations Act.
The Independent Expert’s Report is enclosed with this Explanatory Statement as Annexure A. PKF Corporate has concluded that the issue of Shares to Gage (and/or the Nominee) pursuant to the Gage Subscription and the acquisition by Gage (and, as applicable, the Nominee) of a relevant interest of, and the increase in the voting power of Gage (and, as applicable, the Nominee) from 18.67% to, 51% if Resolution 1 is approved is not fair but reasonable to non-associated Shareholders.
Shareholders are encouraged to read the Notice and this Explanatory Statement (including the Annexures to this Explanatory Statement noting that the Independent Expert’s Report is contained as Annexure A to this Explanatory Statement) prior to determining how to vote on Resolution 1.
Director Interests
No existing Director at the date of the Notice has a direct interest in Resolution 1. It is noted for completeness that, whilst Michele Bina does not have a direct or indirect interest in Gage (including securities held by Gage), Mr Bina is an adviser to Gage and was appointed to the Board as nominee of Gage (refer ASX announcement released 14 November 2023). The Non-Interested Directors (being Andrew Buxton, Dale McCabe and James Myers) do not have any actual or perceived interest in Resolution 1.
Purpose of the Gage Subscription
The purpose of the Gage Subscription is to raise $3,647,200 before costs. Funds raised will provide the Company with sufficient short to medium term funding for advancement of exploration strategies at the projects of the Company and for working capital.
The Non-Interested Directors view the Gage Subscription as an attractive method to raise capital to meet its funding requirements. In reaching this view, the Non-Interested Directors have had regard to the commercial terms of the Gage Subscription including:
-
(a) The price per Share of $0.008 (0.8 cents) under the Gage Subscription, which represents a 60% premium to the closing price per of Shares on ASX on 5 April 2024 (being the trading day on ASX prior to the announcement of the Gage Subscription being made to ASX) of $0.005 (0.5 cent) per Share.
-
(b) The quantum of funds being sufficient, in the view of the Non-Interested Directors, to meet the short to medium term objectives of the Company.
-
(c) The Gage Subscription being by way of an issue of Shares only and the Company consequently not issuing further attaching convertible securities.
7
-
(d) The collective impact of (a) to (c) minimises the potential dilutive impact of raising capital on the other shareholders of the Company, noting it is common for ASX-listed entities to raise capital at a discount and/or with free-attaching securities (as the Company has done in the recent past).
-
(e) The funds raised will not be at risk of repayment as would be the case for an alternative source of funding such as a convertible note.
-
(f) The Company is not providing any guarantee or granting any security in respect of the assets of the Company in connection with the Gage Subscription.
Details of the identified advantages and disadvantages of the Gage Subscription are set out below.
Advantages and Disadvantages
The advantages and disadvantages of the Gage Subscription are described below:
Advantages
-
The issue price of Shares under the Gage Subscription is a significant premium to the closing price of the Shares on ASX on 3 April 2024 of $0.005 (0.5 cents), being the last traded price prior to the announcement of the Gage Subscription. It further represents a significant premium to the last price at which the Company raised capital of $0.005 (0.5 cents) in December 2023, noting that last capital raising also included an offer of free-attaching securities (1:2 quoted options).
-
The issue price of Shares under the Gage Subscription is a premium of 33.3% to the closing price of Shares on ASX on 27 May 2024 of $0.006 (0.6 cents), being the last traded price prior to the date of the Notice.
-
The approval of Resolution 1 and completion of the Gage Subscription will allow the Company to advance exploration on mineral assets, in particular the intention of the Company to advance its Fiji portfolio as a means seeking to increase Shareholder value. If Resolution 1 is not approved, the Company will need to identify alternative financing which may not be available and, even if available, may be on terms which are worse (both in terms of quantum of investment and investment price) than the Gage Subscription.
Disadvantages
-
As the voting power of Gage (and, as applicable, the Nominee) will increase to an ordinary majority of 51% following completion of the Gage Subscription, it will be able to determine the outcome of ordinary resolutions (other than where Gage (and, as applicable, the Nominee) is otherwise excluded from voting) and, as such, it will (subject the terms of any applicable voting exceptions and prohibitions) have significant influence over the passing of ordinary resolutions and will be able to block special resolutions, each of which may have a material impact on the Company and its business. Further details are set out under “Impact on control” below.
-
If Resolution 1 is approved and the Gage Subscription is completed, Gage will also have the right to appoint a second Director to the Board (proposed to be Mr Wang Jianying) and, as such, this will result in Gage having two representatives on the Board of the Company (noting Michele Bina was appointed as a nominee of Gage in the past), representing 40% of the total number of Directors which may further increase the ability of Gage (and, as applicable, the Nominee) to influence the business and strategic direction of the Company. It is however noted that the Non-
8
Interested Directors would still represent a majority of the Directors of the Company and accordingly Gage (and, as applicable, the Nominee) is not able to unilaterally determine the results of Board resolutions by directing, or seeking to direct, its nominee Directors to vote in a certain manner.
Statement of intentions
Other than as disclosed in this Explanatory Statement and changes pursuant to Resolution 1, Gage has confirmed that:
-
it intends to maintain the Company's current business, which is focused on mineral exploration and the development of mining projects;
-
it has no present intention to inject further capital into the Company, unless in connection with its future participation right under the Subscription Agreement or requested by the Company (each subject to certain exceptions, applicable laws and the ASX Listing Rules);
-
other than appointing Mr Wang Jianying as a director of the Company under the terms of the Subscription Agreement, it does not intend to make any changes with regards to the employees or directors of the Company;
-
it does not propose that any assets will be transferred between the Company and Gage, or any of their associates;
-
it has no present intention to otherwise redeploy the fixed assets of the Company; and
-
it has no present intention to change the Company's existing policies in relation to financial matters or dividend distributions.
These present intentions may change as new information becomes available, as circumstances change or in light of all material information, facts and circumstances necessary to assess the operational, commercial, taxation and financial implications of those decisions at the relevant time. Accordingly, the statements set out above are statements of current intentions only.
Impact on control
If Resolution 1 is passed and the Gage Subscription is completed, Gage (and, as applicable, the Nominee) will acquire a relevant interest in 51% of the voting Shares of the Company.
If the Gage Subscription is completed and Gage (and, as applicable, the Nominee) obtains a relevant interest in 51% of the voting Shares of the Company, it will be able to determine the outcome of ordinary resolutions in general meetings of Shareholders where Gage is not otherwise excluded from voting. The ability of Gage (and, as applicable, the Nominee) to pass or not pass ordinary resolutions will allow it to pass (or not pass) ordinary resolutions that have a material impact on the Company and its business, including for example the ability to pass resolutions to appoint or remove Directors.
ASX Listing Rules 14.11 and 14.11.1 contains specific voting exclusions that apply to votes cast in favour of resolutions for the purposes of specific ASX Listing Rules by certain parties. If Gage (and, as applicable, the Nominee) were to be excluded from voting in favour of a resolution in accordance with a voting exclusion applying under ASX Listing Rules 14.11 and 14.11.1, it would not be able to determine if that resolution was passed (however it
9
would be able to vote against the relevant resolution and accordingly determine not to pass that resolution).
The Corporations Act contains voting prohibitions that would either prohibition Gage (and, as applicable, the Nominee) from voting on a resolution in favour or voting at all, depending on the circumstances of the resolution. If it were only able to vote against an ordinary resolution, the potential for it to pass or not pass an ordinary resolution would be consistent with as if it were excluded from voting under the ASX Listing Rules as described above. If Gage (and, as applicable, the Nominee) were excluded from voting entirely, it would not be able to impact if an ordinary resolution was passed or not passed.
In addition, although Gage (and, as applicable, the Nominee) will not be able to unilaterally pass a special resolution of shareholders without support from other shareholders (for example, a special resolution to amend the constitution of the Company) if all other shareholders vote, it will be able to unilaterally determine if a special resolution can be passed by voting against the resolution (subject to not being excluded from voting in all circumstances on the relevant special resolution) or if a special resolution is passed where the percentage of voting Shares held and voted by it is equal to or greater than 75% of all votes cast by Shareholders on the relevant special resolution.
The acquisition by Gage (and, as applicable, the Nominee) of a relevant interest in 51% of the voting shares of the Company would also result in specific restrictions being imposed upon it having regard to its relevant interest, including but not limited to in respect of it further increasing its relevant interest in the voting shares of the Company (which would require compliance with Section 611 of the Corporations Act) and for the entry by the Company into further transactions with Gage (and, as applicable, the Nominee) including for the purposes of Chapter 10 of the ASX Listing Rules.
Capital Structure
The existing capital structure of the Company at the date of the Notice is described below:
| Number | % | |
|---|---|---|
| Shares held by Gage at the date of the Notice | 128,977,226 | 18.7% |
| Shares held by non-associated Shareholders | 562,02,842 | 81.3% |
| Existing Shares | 690,990,068 | 100% |
Note to table: all percentages are subject to rounding.
The capital structure of the Company following completion of the Gage Subscription is as described in the table below (noting all percentages are subject to rounding):
| Number | % of total Shares after Gage Subscription |
|
|---|---|---|
| Existing Shares | 690,990,068 | 60.2% |
| Shares held by Gage at the date of the Notice | 128,977,226 | 11.2% |
| Shares issued to Gage under the Gage Subscription | 455,900,000 | 39.8% |
10
| Total Shares held by Gage after the Gage Subscription is completed |
584,877,226 | 51% |
|---|---|---|
| Total Shares held by shareholders other than Gage after the Gage Subscription is completed |
562,012,842 | 49% |
| Total Shares after the Gage Subscription is completed | 1,146,890,068 | 100% |
Notes to table:
-
(1) All percentages are subject to rounding.
-
(2) References to the percentage interest of Gage following completion of the Gage Subscription include a nominee of Gage (if any) who subscribes for the Shares the subject of the Gage Subscription.
-
(3) Assumes that no convertible securities convert to ordinary shares or that any other ordinary shares are issued between the date of the Notice and the completion of the Gage Subscription.
Nominee Director information
As noted above and in Annexure B, and subject to completion of the Gage Subscription, Gage will have the right to appoint a second director (in addition to Mr Bina) to the Company's board of Directors. Gage has nominated Mr Wang Jianying (the Nominee Director), who is the Chairman of Gage's holding company, Beijing Gage Capital Management Co., Ltd. to be appointed as a Director with effect on and from completion of the Gage Subscription.
Mr Wang Jianying is the Chairman and Legal Representative of Beijing Gage Capital Management Co., Ltd. He was born in July 1972, holds Chinese nationality, does not have permanent residence rights overseas, and holds a master's degree. He holds multiple important positions. In addition to Beijing Gage Capital Management Co., Ltd., he also serves as the Legal Representative of 31 other enterprises, and holds executive positions in 28 enterprises. His professional career covers a wide range of areas, including venture capital and private equity, with in-depth research and extensive experience in investment in international mining, new energy, and new technology projects.
Mr Wang Jianying holds a 43.38% beneficial shareholding in Beijing Gage Capital Management Co., Ltd and, as a result of this shareholding, Mr Wang Jianying will benefit from any investment returns Gage receives from the Company.
Voting prohibition
Gage and its associates are excluded from voting in favour of Resolution 1 and accordingly those shareholders of the Company other than Gage and its associates will determine if the Gage Subscription is able to proceed.
Chapter 2E of the Corporations Act
The Company notes that the Gage Subscription may give rise to matters which could be viewed as giving a financial benefit to a related party, for example the appointment of Mr Wang Jianying as a nominee Director of Gage on and from completion of the Gage Subscription and the interest that Mr Jianying has in Gage which would lead to investment return (refer to the disclosure with respect to Mr Wang Jianying above).
11
To the extent that the Gage Subscription is considered to constitute the Company giving a financial benefit to a related party, the Non-Interested Directors view that such financial benefit is given on terms that are reasonable in the circumstances in the Company and the related party were dealing on arm’s length in accordance with section 210 of the Corporations Act. The Non-Interested Directors note the following key matters in support of the position that the financial benefit is given on arm’s length terms:
-
(a) The terms of the Subscription Agreement are comparable to, and typical of, similar equity subscriptions and on terms which are formally documented and were negotiated extensively between the Company and Gage. Each of the Company and Gage appointed separate advisors in connection with the Gage Subscription.
-
(b) The terms of the Gage Subscription are less favourable than recent capital raisings completed by the Company. In particular, the issue price of $0.008 (0.8 cents) is 60% higher than the price at which the Company most recently raised funds ($0.005 (0.5 cents) in December 2023) and did not include any free-attaching securities (noting the capital raising in December 2023 included 1:2 free-attaching quoted options).
-
(c) Michele Bina, who was nominated by Gage as a Director, did not participate in the decision of the Board to proceed (which was made by the Non-Interested Directors). It is further noted that Michele Bina is not making any recommendation in respect of Resolution 1.
-
(d) No other formal offers to subscribe for the Company’s shares were made, and the Board considers it is highly unlikely it would be able to attract an investor at the same price or to the same quantum as Gage (noting point (b) above with respect to the terms of the most recent capital raising of the Company completed in December 2023).
-
(e) The Non-Interested Directors consider that the Gage Subscription:
-
Will have a positive impact upon the financial position by raising capital and that the receipt of such capital will positively impact upon the performance of the Company by providing it funds to conduct activities on its projects.
-
Fits within the business plan of the Company to raise funds to pursue exploration at its projects in accordance with its business plan, including having regard to the Statement of Intentions of Gage set out above in this Explanatory Statement.
ASX Listing Rules
The issue of Shares pursuant to the Gage Subscription is conditional upon shareholders passing Resolution 1. As the Company is seeking shareholder approval for the purposes of item 7 of Section 611 of the Corporations Act there is no requirement for the Company to seek approval for the purposes of Chapter 7 of the ASX Listing Rules and the issue of Shares pursuant to Resolution 1 will not use the placement capacity available to the Company under the ASX Listing Rules on the basis ASX Listing Rule 7.2 Exception 8 applies.
The Company is not seeking shareholder approval for the purposes of Chapter 10 of the ASX Listing Rules on the basis that:
- As a current holder of 10% or more of the issued shares of the Company, Gage is a party to which ASX Listing Rule 10.1.3 applies. If the issue of Shares under the Gage Subscription is considered to be a disposal of a substantial asset, ASX Listing Rule 10.3(d) applies as the Shares are being issued for cash under the Gage Subscription. Accordingly approval is not required for the purposes of ASX Listing Rule 10.1; and
12
- Gage is a party to which ASX Listing Rule 10.11.3 applies on the basis that Gage is a current holder of 10% or more of the issued shares of the Company and has nominated a director (Michele Bina) to join the Board. ASX Listing Rule 10.12 Exception 6 applies on the basis the Company will only issue the Shares the subject of the Gage Subscription if Resolution 1 (being approval for the purposes of Item 7 of Section 611 of the Corporations Act) is approved and accordingly approval is not required for the purposes of ASX Listing Rule 10.11.
Having regard to the above, the Company is not seeking any shareholder approval for the purposes of the ASX Listing Rules in connection with the Gage Subscription.
Director recommendations
As noted above, Michele Bina is considered to have a perceived interest in Resolution 1 and accordingly Michele Bina abstains from making any recommendation to shareholders in respect of Resolution 1. The Non-Interested Directors unanimously recommend that shareholders vote in favour of Resolution 1 on the basis of the rationale for the Company proceeding with the Gage Subscription described above.
13
GLOSSARY
$ means Australian dollars.
AEST means Australian Eastern Standard Time as observed in Melbourne, Victoria.
Annexure means an annexure to the Explanatory Statement.
General Meeting or Meeting means the meeting convened by the Notice.
ASX means ASX Limited.
ASX Listing Rules means the Listing Rules of ASX.
Board means the current board of Directors of the Company.
Chair means the chair of the Meeting.
Company means Alice Queen Limited (ACN 099 247 408).
Constitution means the Company’s constitution.
Corporations Act means the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth).
Directors means the current directors of the Company.
Explanatory Statement means the explanatory statement accompanying the Notice.
Gage means Gage Resource Development Pty Ltd [ACN 671 483 346].
Gage Subscription means the Subscription by Gage for 455,900,000 Shares at an issue price of $0.008 (0.8 cents) per Share to raise $3,647,200 before costs.
Nominee means a nominee who Gage nominates to acquire the Shares under the Gage Subscription, such nominee to be a related body corporate of Gage and provided that, in the reasonable opinion of the Company, the nomination does not invalidate any shareholder approval obtained by the Company in respect of the Gage Subscription or otherwise adversely affect the ability of the Company or Gage to complete the Gage Subscription.
Nominee Director means Mr Wang Jianying, the nominee of Gage who is to be appointed as a Director at completion of the Subscription.
Non-Interested Directors means collectively Andrew Buxton, Dales McCabe and James Myers.
Notice or Notice of General Meeting means this notice of meeting including the Explanatory Statement and the Proxy Form.
PKF Corporate means PKF Melbourne Corporate Pty Ltd.
Proxy Form means the proxy form accompanying the Notice.
Resolution means a resolution as set out in the Notice.
Share means a fully paid ordinary share in the capital of the Company.
Shareholder means a holder of a Share.
14
Subscription Agreement means the binding but conditional subscription confirmation letter between the Company and Gage, the material terms of which are summarised in Annexure B.
15
ANNEXURE A - INDEPENDENT EXPERT’S REPORT
16
==> picture [91 x 31] intentionally omitted <==
27 May 2024
PKF Melbourne Corporate Pty Ltd ACN 063 564 045 AFSL No: 222050 Level 15, 500 Bourke Street Melbourne, Victoria 3000
The Independent Directors Alice Queen Limited Level 2, 568 Chapel Street SOUTH YARRA VIC 3141
T: +61 3 9679 2222 F: +61 3 9679 2288 [email protected] www.pkf.com.au
Dear Independent Directors
Re: Independent Expert’s Report
1. Introduction
The Independent Directors of Alice Queen Limited (“ AQX ” or “ Alice Queen ” or the “ Company ”) have requested PKF Melbourne Corporate Pty Ltd (“ PKF Corporate ”) to prepare an Independent Expert's Report (“ IER ”) in respect of a capital raising that may see Gage Resource Development Pty Ltd and/or any related body corporate (collectively referred to as “ Gage ”) increase its voting power in the Company.
Gage is an Australian subsidiary of Beijing Gage Capital Management Co. Ltd., a Beijing-based private equity group. Gage emerged as a major shareholder of the Company during late 2023 and currently holds a relevant interest of 18.67% of the voting power in the Company (refer further to Section 2.3 of the IER).
As the proposed transaction may result in Gage’s voting power in the Company increasing beyond the 20% limit imposed by Section 606 of the Corporations Act 2001 (the “ Act ”), the proposed transaction cannot proceed without prior approval by the non-associated shareholders of the Company (the “ Non-Associated Shareholders ”) in accordance with Section 611 item 7 of the Act.
PKF Melbourne Corporate Pty Ltd is a member of PKF Global, the network of member firms of PKF International Limited, each of which is a separately owned legal entity and does not accept any responsibility or liability for the actions or inactions of any individual member or correspondent firm(s).
Liability limited by a scheme approved under Professional Standards Legislation.
==> picture [75 x 26] intentionally omitted <==
- The Proposed Issue
2.1 Background to the Proposed Issue
On 8 April 2024, the Company announced to the Australian Securities Exchange (“ ASX ”) that it had entered into a binding but conditional subscription agreement (the “ Subscription Agreement ”) under which Gage agreed to subscribe for 455,900,000 new AQX Ordinary Shares at an issue price of AU$0.008 per AQX share which, if approved by the Non-Associated Shareholders, may increase the relevant interest of Gage in the voting power in the Company to 51% (the “ Proposed Issue ”).
The Proposed Issue is conditional upon, among other things (refer further to ‘Annexure B –
Summary of Subscription Agreement’ of the Notice of General Meeting), on Alice Queen:
-
obtaining shareholder approval;
-
issuing a prospectus to facilitate secondary trading of the new AQX shares to be issued under the Subscription Agreement; and
-
obtaining any other necessary approvals, consents, authorisations and/or waivers.
If the Non-Associated Shareholders approve the Proposed Issue, Alice Queen will raise approximately AU$3.64 million (before costs). The proceeds raised from the Proposed Issue will support Alice Queen’s operations and overall exploration strategies and are intended to primarily be used to facilitate the advancement of exploration strategies in Fiji, in particular further geological mapping and sampling at the Sabeto project and the recommencement of exploration at the Viani project (refer further to Section 6.1 of the IER).
2.2 Proposed Resolution to be Approved by Shareholders
The Company is seeking shareholder approval at the forthcoming General Meeting (the “ Meeting ”). The Notice of General Meeting (the “ Notice ”) requires the AQX shareholders to vote on the following ordinary resolution:
Resolution 1: Approval for acquisition of a relevant interest
“That, for the purposes of item 7 of section 611 of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) and for all other purposes, approval is given for the issue of 455,900,000 fully paid ordinary shares at an issue price of $0.008 (0.8 cents) per share to Gage (and/or the Nominee) and for the acquisition by Gage (and, as applicable, the Nominee) of a relevant interest in the issued voting shares in the Company of, and the increase in the voting power of Gage (and, as applicable, the Nominee) from 18.67% to, 51%, as described in the Explanatory Statement which accompanied and formed part of this Notice.”
2
==> picture [75 x 26] intentionally omitted <==
We have been requested to provide an opinion on whether Resolution 1 is fair and reasonable to the Non-Associated Shareholders.
The Independent Directors of the Company have requested PKF Corporate to prepare an IER in accordance with ASIC Regulatory Guide 111 – Content of Expert Reports. ASIC Regulatory Guide 111 requires the Independent Expert to advise the Non-Associated Shareholders of the Company whether Resolution 1 of the Notice is fair and reasonable, when considered in the context of the interests of the Non-Associated Shareholders (all shareholders entitled to vote on Resolution 1).
2.3 Impact of the Proposed Issue
Gage currently holds a relevant interest in 128,977,226 AQX Ordinary Shares that carry voting rights or 18.67% of the voting power. Resolution 1 seeks approval by the Non-Associated Shareholders for up to 455,900,000 new AQX Ordinary Shares to be issued to Gage under the Proposed Issue.
The table below shows the impact of the Proposed Issue on Gage’s voting power in the Company that would result should Resolution 1 of the Notice be approved and the new AQX shares be subsequently issued.
Table 1
| Alice Queen Limited Shareholding structure |
if not approved | if approved |
|---|---|---|
| Number of shares held Voting power |
Number of shares held Voting power |
|
| Gage Resource Development Pty Ltd | 128,977,226 18.67% |
584,877,226 51.00% |
| Ms Chunyan Niu | 107,157,971 15.51% |
107,157,971 9.34% |
| Finico Pty Ltd | 91,779,951 13.28% |
91,779,951 8.00% |
| Total Other Non-Associated Shareholders | 363,074,920 52.54% |
363,074,920 31.65% |
| Total Non-Associated Shareholders | 562,012,842 81.33% |
562,012,842 49.00% |
| Total Shares on Issue | 690,990,068 100.00% |
1,146,890,068 100.00% |
As can be seen from the above table, if the Non-Associated Shareholders approve Resolution 1, Gage will be entitled to 455,900,000 new AQX Ordinary Shares under the Proposed Issue which would result in Gage’s voting power in Alice Queen increasing from 18.67% to 51.0%.
As the Proposed Issue will result in an increase in the voting power of Gage from a starting position below the 20.0% limit imposed by Section 606 of the Act, the Proposed Issue cannot take place without prior approval by the AQX shareholders in accordance with Section 611 Item 7 of the Act.
3
==> picture [75 x 26] intentionally omitted <==
3. Summary opinions
In our opinion, the Proposed Issue (Resolution 1 of the Notice) is not fair but is reasonable to the Non-Associated Shareholders. Our principal reasons for reaching this opinion are:
Fairness
In Section 7 of the IER, we assessed the value of an AQX Ordinary Share on a control basis before the Proposed Issue to be in a range of AU$0.018 to AU$0.024 per AQX share, with a mid-point of AU$0.021 per AQX share.
In Section 8 of the IER, we assessed the value of an AQX Ordinary Share on a minority basis after the Proposed Issue to be in a range of AU$0.011 to AU$0.014 per AQX share, with a mid-point of say AU$0.0125 per AQX share.
As the minority value mid-point (AU$0.0125) of an AQX Ordinary Share after the Proposed Issue is less than the control value mid-point (AU$0.021) of an AQX Ordinary Share before the Proposed Issue, we have concluded that the Proposed Issue is not fair.
Reasonableness
In Section 10 of the IER, we considered that the advantages of the Proposed Issue outweigh the disadvantages of the Proposed Issue and for this reason we have assessed the Proposed Issue as being reasonable . A summary of the significant factors that we considered are as follows:
Advantages
-
The issue price of the new AQX Ordinary Shares subject to the Proposed Issue is at a premium of 60% compared to the closing share price of an AQX share on 3 April 2024 (AU$0.005 being the last traded price in an AQX share prior to the announcement of the Proposed Issue) and also a premium of approximately 60% compared to the closing share price of an AQX share on 3 May 2024 (AU$0.005). Accordingly, this premium (calculated by reference to share prices at which AQX shares traded on the ASX) effectively represents the control premium paid for Gage to increase its voting power.
-
If the Non-Associated Shareholders approve the Proposed Issue, the consolidation of Gage as a major shareholder of Alice Queen may provide a level of market confidence and may also financially support the future exploration and development activities of Alice Queen. Gage has indicated that it has no intention to change the strategic direction of Alice Queen, its employment level or management team (other than appointing Mr Wang Jianying as a Director) and Gage has indicated it has no present intention to inject further capital into Alice Queen unless in connection with its future participation right (refer further to ‘Annexure C – Statement of Intentions – Gage’ of the Notice).
4
==> picture [75 x 26] intentionally omitted <==
- Approval of the Proposed Issue will allow Alice Queen to deploy the additional cash resources raised towards the exploration activities of Alice Queen’s mineral assets, in particular Alice Queen’s intention to advance its portfolio of mineral assets in Fiji, in order to unlock any potential upside value for shareholders.
Disadvantages
- If the Non-Associated Shareholders approve the Proposed Issue, Gage may control up to 51.0% of Alice Queen’s voting power, an increase from 18.67%. As a result, the stake of the Non-Associated Shareholders will be diluted from 81.33% to 49.0% and they will have reduced ability to influence the operating, financing and strategic direction of Alice Queen.
Further, as Gage’s voting power will increase beyond 50% it will be able to determine the outcome of ordinary resolutions in general meetings of the Company’s shareholders (where Gage is not otherwise excluded from voting) and, as such, Gage may have the capacity to have significant influence over the passing of ordinary resolutions that may have a material impact on Alice Queen and its business.
Further, as Gage’s voting power will increase beyond 25% it may have the capacity to block the passing of a special resolution.
- If the Non-Associated Shareholders approve the Proposed Issue, Gage will also have the right to appoint a second director to the Board of the Company (proposed to be Mr Wang Jianying with effect on and from completion of the Proposed Issue) and, as such, this will result in Gage having two (2) representatives on the Board of the Company (the existing representative being Mr Michele Alessandro Bina) and/or holding 40% of the Board seats. This may further improve the ability of Gage to influence the operating, financing and strategic direction of Alice Queen.
Other factors
- The issue price (AU$0.008) of the new AQX Ordinary Shares subject to the Proposed Issue is at a premium to the issue price of an AQX share conducted under the December 2023 placement and rights issue (completed at an issue price of AU$0.005 per AQX share including a free-attaching option), however, the issue price is at a discount to the issue price of an AQX share of AU$0.014 conducted under the placement to Gage during November 2023.
We have assessed Gage’s average entry price of an AQX share and presented our analysis in Table 15 of Section 10 of the IER. The issue price (AU$0.008) of the new AQX Ordinary Shares subject to the Proposed Issue is at a premium to Gage’s average entry price of AU$0.006 per AQX share.
5
==> picture [75 x 26] intentionally omitted <==
- If the Non-Associated Shareholders do not approve the Proposed Issue, this may discourage Gage from providing further financial support to Alice Queen and Alice Queen may need to seek alternative funding to support its exploration activities (in particular minimum expenditure commitments to meet the conditions under which the mineral assets are granted) as well as working capital requirements.
Seeking alternative funding may require extensive management focus and expense to secure, which may leave Alice Queen without the resources to achieve its business plans. The availability of alternative funding may be on substantially less advantageous terms than the Proposed Issue and may be highly dilutive to existing shareholders in Alice Queen.
- The closing share prices of AQX shares during the period leading up to the announcement of the Proposed Issue were in a range of AU$0.005 to AU$0.006 per AQX share (refer to Section 7.3 of the IER). Prior to the announcement of the Proposed Issue, the AQX shares last closed at AU$0.007 per AQX share during January 2024 and at AU$0.008 per AQX share during November 2023.
If the Non-Associated Shareholders do not approve the Proposed Issue, the Alice Queen share price may continue to trade at existing levels without the prospect of any immediate alternative funding source.
- The cash reserves of Alice Queen were less than AU$500,000 as at 31 March 2024. Alice Queen’s independent auditor’s review report set out in Alice Queen’s Interim Financial Report for the Half-Year ended 31 December 2023 raised a material uncertainty in relation to Alice Queen’s ability to continue as a going concern.
If the Non-Associated Shareholders do not approve the Proposed Issue, Alice Queen may be required to manage insufficient financial resources which will not enhance its ability to meet its ongoing working capital requirements and exploration commitments and remain solvent.
6
==> picture [75 x 26] intentionally omitted <==
- Structure of this report
The remainder of this report is divided into the following sections:
| Section 5 Purpose of the report 6 Alice Queen – key information 7 Valuation of AQX shares before the Proposed Issue 8 Valuation of AQX shares after the Proposed Issue 9 Assessment as to Fairness 10 Assessment as to Reasonableness 11 Assessment as to Fairness and Reasonableness 12 Financial Services Guide Appendix A Sources of Information B Declarations, Qualifications and Consents C Valuation methodologies Attachment 1 Independent Technical Specialists Report |
Page 8 11 22 33 34 34 37 38 41 42 44 |
|---|---|
7
==> picture [75 x 26] intentionally omitted <==
- Purpose of the report
This report has been prepared to meet the following regulatory requirements:
Corporations Act 2001 – Section 611
Section 606 of the Act contains a general prohibition on the acquisition of shares in a company if, as a result of the acquisition, any person increases his or her voting power in the company:
-
(a) from 20% or below to more than 20%; or
-
(b) from a starting point that is above 20% and below 90%.
Section 611 of the Act contains an exception to the Section 606 prohibition. For an acquisition of shares to fall within the exception, the acquisition must be approved in advance by a resolution passed at a general meeting of the company whose shares will be acquired.
The Company is seeking shareholder approval for the Proposed Issue under item 7 of Section 611 of the Act, as the voting power of Gage may increase from 20% or below to more than 20% as provided by Section 606 of the Act.
ASIC Regulatory Guide 111 – Content of Expert Reports (“RG111”)
-
RG 111.24 An issue of shares by a company otherwise prohibited under s606 may be approved under item 7 of s611 and the effect on the company’s shareholding is comparable to a takeover bid. Examples of such issues approved under item 7 of s611 that are comparable to takeover bids under Ch 6 include:
-
(b) a company issues securities in exchange for cash, as a consequence, the allottee acquires over 20% of the company. The allottee could have achieved the same or a similar outcome by using a cash-rich entity to make a scrip takeover bid for the company.
-
RG 111.27 There may be circumstances in which the allottee will acquire 20% or more of the voting power of the securities in the company following the allotment or increase an existing holding of 20% or more, but does not obtain a practical measure of control or increase its practical control over that company. If the expert believes that the allottee has not obtained or increased its control over the company as a practical matter, then the expert could take this outcome into account in assessing whether the issue price is ‘reasonable’ if it has assessed the issue price as being ‘not fair’ applying the test in RG 111.11.
8
==> picture [75 x 26] intentionally omitted <==
-
RG 111.10 It has long been accepted in Australian mergers and acquisitions practice that the words ‘fair and reasonable’ in s640 establish two distinct criteria for an expert analysing a control transaction:
-
(a) is the offer ‘fair’; and
-
(b) is it ‘reasonable’?
-
That is, ‘fair and reasonable’ is not regarded as a compound phrase.
-
RG 111.11 Under this convention, an offer is ‘fair’ if the value of the offer price or consideration is equal to or greater than the value of the securities the subject of the offer[1] . This comparison should be made:
-
(a) assuming a knowledgeable and willing, but not anxious, buyer and a knowledgeable and willing, but not anxious, seller acting at arm’s length; and
-
(b) assuming 100% ownership of the ‘target’ and irrespective of whether the consideration is scrip or cash. The expert should not consider the percentage holding of the ‘bidder’ or its associates in the target when making this comparison. For example, in valuing securities in the target entity, it is inappropriate to apply a discount on the basis that the shares being acquired represent a minority or ‘portfolio’ parcel of shares.
-
RG 111.12 An offer is ‘reasonable’ if it is fair. It might also be ‘reasonable’ if, despite being ‘not fair’, the expert believes that there are sufficient reasons for security holders to accept the offer in the absence of any higher bid before the close of the offer.
RG111 requires that the Proposed Issue be assessed as if it was a takeover of the Company. In assessing a takeover bid, RG111 states that the expert should consider whether the Proposed Issue is both “fair” and “reasonable.
1 In an ASIC Corporate Finance Liaison presentation in May 2013, ASIC has expressed the view that transactions pursuant to item 7 of Section 611 of the Act should be assessed by “comparing the fair market value of the company’s shares pre-transaction on a control basis, with the fair market value of the company’s shares post-transaction on a minority basis”.
9
==> picture [75 x 26] intentionally omitted <==
General
The terms “fair” and “reasonable” are not defined in the Act, however, guidance as to the meaning of these terms is provided by ASIC in Regulatory Guide 111. For the purpose of this report, we have defined them as follows:
Fairness the Proposed Issue is “fair” if the value of the minority shares held by the Non-Associated Shareholders in the Company after the Proposed Issue is equal to or greater than the control value of the shares held by the NonAssociated Shareholders in the Company before the Proposed Issue. Reasonableness the Proposed Issue is “reasonable” if it is fair. It may also be “reasonable” if, despite not being “fair” but after considering other significant factors, shareholders should vote in favour of the Proposed Issue in the absence of a superior proposal being received.
What is fair and reasonable for the Non-Associated Shareholders should be judged in all the circumstances of the proposal.
The methodology that we have used to form an opinion as to whether the Proposed Issue is fair and reasonable, is summarised as follows:
-
(i) In determining whether the Proposed Issue is fair, we have:
-
assessed the value of Alice Queen before the Proposed Issue and determined the control value of one AQX Ordinary Share;
-
assessed the value of Alice Queen after the Proposed Issue and determined the minority value of one AQX Ordinary Share; and
-
compared the control value of one AQX Ordinary Share before the Proposed Issue with the minority value of one AQX Ordinary Share after the Proposed Issue.
-
(ii) In determining whether the Proposed Issue is reasonable, we have analysed other significant factors that the Non-Associated Shareholders should review and consider prior to accepting or rejecting the Proposed Issue.
10
==> picture [75 x 26] intentionally omitted <==
- Alice Queen - key information
6.1 Background
Alice Queen is an ASX-listed mineral exploration company with a portfolio of projects in Australia and Fiji. The figure below shows a map presenting the location of Alice Queen’s exploration projects.
Figure 1
==> picture [472 x 397] intentionally omitted <==
Source: Alice Queen’s December 2023 Quarterly Activities Report
An overview of each of Alice Queen’s projects is discussed below and further detailed information in relation to the projects is provided in the SRK Consulting (Australasia) Pty Ltd (“ SRK ”)[2] Independent Specialist Report (the “ Specialist Report ”) (see Attachment 1 to the IER).
2 SRK is an independent, international group providing specialized consultancy services. Among SRK’s clients are many of the world’s mining companies, exploration companies, financial institutions, EPCM and construction firms and government bodies.
11
==> picture [75 x 26] intentionally omitted <==
Fiji based projects
Alice Queen’s Fiji projects comprise of three (3) project areas: Viani, Sabeto and Nabila (collectively the “ Fiji Projects ”). The respective mineral tenements of the Fiji Projects are held by Alice Exploration Pte Ltd, a wholly owned subsidiary of Alice Queen. The figure below shows a map presenting the location of the Fiji Projects.
Figure 2
==> picture [476 x 418] intentionally omitted <==
Source: Alice Queen’s Interim Financial Report for the half-year ended 31 December 2023
During the June 2022 quarter Alice Queen finalised the acquisition of the respective Special Prospecting Licenses in respect to the Viani and Nabila projects (consideration of AU$10,000 was paid) and during December 2022 Alice Queen was granted the Special Prospecting License at the Sabeto project.
12
==> picture [75 x 26] intentionally omitted <==
The exploration at the Fiji Projects is primarily gold focused. Alice Queen recommenced exploration activity at the Sabeto project and intends to recommence exploration at the Viani project upon successful renewal of the respective Exploration Licence with the Mineral Resources Department of Fiji[3] . Alice Queen has also applied for the renewal of its Exploration Licence at the Nabila project.
New South Wales (NSW) based projects
Alice Queen’s NSW projects comprise of three (3) project areas: Byrock, Gongolgon and Lachlan Fold Belt. The respective mineral tenements in relation to the Byrock and Gongolgon projects are held by Monzodiorite Pty Ltd, a wholly owned subsidiary of Alice Queen. The two (2) respective mineral tenements in relation to the Lachlan Fold Belt Project (collectively the “ LFB Project ”) are held by Monzonite Metals Pty Ltd, a subsidiary of Alice Queen which it holds a 90% equity interest in.
As part of Alice Queen’s strategy to diversify away from its gold focused portfolio, Alice Queen applied for and was granted (during May 2023) Exploration Licences at Byrock (located near Bourke, NSW, which is prospective for battery metals) and at Gongolgon (located adjacent to the Byrock tenement, which is prospective for Rare Earth Elements). The Byrock and Gongolgon projects form Alice Queen’s ‘Critical Minerals Projects’ and during late January 2024 Alice Queen commenced its maiden reconnaissance program to assess these project tenements.
During 2023, Alice Queen scaled down its efforts in relation to the LFB Project by closing its operations centre in Dubbo, NSW and relinquishing a number of its tenements held as part of the LFB Project, whilst maintaining only two (2) Exploration Licences.
3 ASX announcement dated 26 February 2024 ‘Porphyry – Copper Gold Alkaline Breccia Target Emerging at Sabeto’, Director’s Report dated 13 March 2024 (as part of AQX’s Interim Financial Report for the Half-Year ended 31 December 2023)
13
==> picture [75 x 26] intentionally omitted <==
Torres Strait based projects
Alice Queen’s Torres Strait projects comprises of two (2) project areas: Horn Island (located in Torres Strait, Queensland, Australia) and Kaiwalagal (located adjacent to Horn Island) (collectively the “ Torres Strait Projects ”). The respective mineral tenements are held by Kauraru Gold Pty Ltd, a subsidiary of Alice Queen which it holds an 84.5% equity interest in. The figure below shows a map presenting the location of the Torres Strait Projects.
Figure 3
==> picture [471 x 399] intentionally omitted <==
Source: Alice Queen’s Interim Financial Report for the half-year ended 31 December 2023
The Horn Island project is Alice Queen’s most advanced project with an existing completed scoping study and Mineral Resource Estimate (MRE), indicated and inferred, of 16.7 million tonnes at 0.98 grams per tonne of gold for 524,000 ounces.
In respect of the Kaiwalagal project, Alice Queen commenced planning to reduce the areas of this project that were deemed surplus to this project area.
14
==> picture [75 x 26] intentionally omitted <==
6.2 Directors
Alice Queen’s Directors at the date of this report are presented in the table below.
Table 2
Alice Queen Limited Directors
Mr Andrew Buxton (Managing Director) Mr Dale McCabe (Executive Director) Mr James Myers (Non-Executive Director) Mr Michele Alessandro Bina (Non-Executive Director)
Source: ASX
6.3 Issued capital
As at 10 May 2024, Alice Queen had a total of 690,990,068 fully paid Ordinary Shares on issue. The substantial shareholders of Alice Queen as at 10 May 2024 (as disclosed by notices announced to the ASX and the Alice Queen shareholder register) held a relevant interest in 47.46% of the issued ordinary capital of Alice Queen and we have presented their shareholding in the table below.
Table 3
| Alice Queen Limited | Number of | Percentage |
|---|---|---|
| Shareholder name | shares held | Interest |
| Gage Resource Development Pty Ltd | 128,977,226 | 18.67% |
| Ms Chunyan Niu | 107,157,971 | 15.51% |
| Finico Pty Ltd | 91,779,951 | 13.28% |
| Total | 327,915,148 | 47.46% |
Source: ASX, Alice Queen
During November 2023, Gage subscribed for 18,977,226 new AQX ordinary shares at an issue price of AU$0.014 per AQX share which raised approximately AU$266,000. During December 2023, Alice Queen raised approximately AU$2.73 million (before capital raising costs) following the issue of a total of 545,492,065 new AQX ordinary shares (including 272,746,034 new AQX unlisted options) under a placement and rights issue undertaken at an issue price of AU$0.005 per AQX share including a free-attaching option (refer the ‘AQXOC’ listed options set out in Table 4 of the IER).
15
==> picture [75 x 26] intentionally omitted <==
Under the placement and rights issue, Ms Chunyan Niu (“ Ms Niu ”) subscribed for and acquired 112,552,180 new AQX ordinary shares (raising approximately AU$560,700) and emerged as Alice Queen’s second (2[nd] ) largest shareholder. Prior to the announcement of the Proposed Issue to the ASX (8 April 2024), Ms Niu held 114,221,276 AQX Ordinary Shares and subsequently disposed of 7,063,305 AQX Ordinary Shares on-market (after the announcement of the Proposed Issue).
Prior to the announcement of the Proposed Issue to the ASX (8 April 2024), Finico Pty Ltd (“ Finico ”) held 51,115,307 AQX Ordinary Shares representing a relevant interest in 7.40% of the issued ordinary capital of Alice Queen. Finico subsequently acquired an additional 40,664,644 (or approximately 5.88%%) of AQX Ordinary Shares on-market[4] .
As at 3 May 2024, Alice Queen also had a total of 396,791,146 listed options on issue and
3,063,330 unlisted options on issue that are convertible into Ordinary Shares of Alice Queen. We have presented the terms of these securities in the table below.
Table 4
| Alice Queen Limited | Total | Exercise price | Expiry |
|---|---|---|---|
| Options | number | AU$ | date |
| Listed options (AQXOA) | 20,942,634 | 0.16 | 9-Dec-25 |
| Listed options (AQXOB) | 7,268,408 | 0.26 | 23-Sep-25 |
| Listed options (AQXOC) | 368,580,104 | 0.02 | 19-Aug-26 |
| Unlisted options | 1,563,330 | 1.00 | 25-Jun-24 |
| Unlisted options | 1,500,000 | 0.06 | 25-Jun-24 |
| Total | 399,854,476 |
Source: ASX
After considering the terms and conditions of all the Alice Queen options (listed and unlisted), we have not treated any of these options on an as converted basis (non-dilutive basis) in the balance of the IER as:
- the listed options ‘AQXOA’ and ‘AQXOB’ have exercise prices much greater than the closing share price of an AQX share on 3 May 2024 (AU$0.005) and, as such, they are considered to be well out of the money;
4 ASX announcements dated 15 April 2024 and 10 May 2024 ‘Change in substantial holding’
16
==> picture [75 x 26] intentionally omitted <==
-
the unlisted options expire in less than 2 months (25 June 2024) and have exercise prices greater than the closing share price of an AQX share on 3 May 2024 and, as such, they are considered to be out of the money. We note that the unlisted options with an exercise price of AU$0.060 would raise AU$90,000 should they be converted, and we do not consider they will materially impact the fully diluted value of Alice Queen if they were treated on an as converted basis; and
-
the listed options ‘AQXOC’ have an exercise price (AU$0.02) greater than the closing share price of an AQX share on 3 May 2024 (AU$0.005) albeit at a much smaller premium (four-fold) when compared to all of the other Alice Queen options and as they expire in approximately 2.5 years time (19 August 2026), we do not consider the option holders would convert these options until closer to their expiry date.
17
==> picture [75 x 26] intentionally omitted <==
6.4 Statement of financial position
AQX’s consolidated statements of financial position as at 30 June 2022 and 2023 and 31 December 2023 are presented in the table below.
Table 5
| Alice Queen Limited | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Consolidated Statement of Financial Position | Audited | Audited | Reviewed |
| AU$ | Jun-22 | Jun-23 | Dec-23 |
| Assets | |||
| Current Assets | |||
| Cash and cash equivalents | 333,673 | 41,934 | 1,560,749 |
| Trade and other receivables | 105,873 | 45,695 | 95,962 |
| Security deposits | - | - | 60,982 |
| Prepayments | 31,880 | 25,879 | 61,674 |
| Total Current Assets | 471,426 | 113,508 | 1,779,367 |
| Non-Current Assets | |||
| Property, plant and equipment | 63,328 | 51,970 | 40,097 |
| Exploration and evaluation expenditure | 17,192,744 | - | - |
| Security deposits | 140,703 | 167,786 | 46,648 |
| Right-of-use-assets | 85,387 | 26,515 | 215,579 |
| Total Non-Current Assets | 17,482,162 | 246,271 | 302,324 |
| Total Assets | 17,953,588 | 359,779 | 2,081,691 |
| Liabilities | |||
| Current Liabilities | |||
| Trade and other payables | 682,170 | 566,232 | 460,305 |
| Provision for annual leave | 100,477 | 130,031 | 29,513 |
| Lease liability | 59,833 | 26,515 | 68,778 |
| Borrowings | - | 159,087 | 400,000 |
| Total Current Liabilities | 842,480 | 881,865 | 958,596 |
| Non-Current Liabilities | |||
| Lease liability | 25,554 | - | 147,357 |
| Provision for longservice leave | 18,986 | 25,119 | 27,303 |
| Total Non-Current Liabilities | 44,540 | 25,119 | 174,660 |
| Total Liabilities | 887,020 | 906,984 | 1,133,256 |
| Net Assets | 17,066,568 | (547,205) | 948,435 |
| Equity | |||
| Share capital | 34,041,618 | 35,649,420 | 38,460,143 |
| Reserves | 1,630,821 | 1,945,956 | 1,982,567 |
| Minority interest | (811,875) | (3,633,348) | (3,670,149) |
| Accumulated losses | (17,793,996) | (34,509,233) | (35,824,126) |
| Total Equity | 17,066,568 | (547,205) |
948,435 |
Source: AQX’s Annual Report for the financial years ended 30 June 2022 and 2023, AQX’s Interim Financial Report for the half-year ended 31 December 2023
18
==> picture [75 x 26] intentionally omitted <==
Numbers in the table may not reconcile to the nearest dollar with the financial statements due to rounding.
In relation to the financial position of Alice Queen, we provide the following comments:
- As at 31 December 2023, Alice Queen held cash resources of approximately AU$1.56 million compared to borrowings of AU$400,000.
On 2 January 2024, Alice Queen used part of its cash resources to repay the debt facility from GTT Ventures Pty Ltd of AU$400,000 (reported as ‘borrowings’) plus interest accrued (at a rate of 2% per month over a period of five (5) months)[5] .
As at 31 December 2023, Alice Queen held cash-backed security deposits totalling approximately AU$107,000.
As at 31 March 2024[6] , Alice Queen held cash resources of approximately AU$464,000, a net cash outflow of approximately AU$1.097 million during the March 2024 quarter which included the repayment of the debt owed to GTT Ventures Pty Ltd.
- As at 1 July 2022, Alice Queen changed its accounting policy in respect to ‘exploration and evaluation expenditure’ which resulted in the impairment of all capitalised costs of past exploration and evaluation expenditure. Accordingly, Alice Queen no longer reports exploration and evaluation expenditure relating to its mineral assets as an asset. The ultimate recoverability of such past costs incurred is dependent on the successful development and commercial exploitation, or the sale, of Alice Queen’s interests in its projects.
Alice Queen will incur mine rehabilitation and site restoration costs at its Horn Island project should this project be abandoned. The ultimate rehabilitation costs are uncertain and cost estimates can vary in response to many factors. As at 31 December 2023, Alice Queen reported a provision for such rehabilitation and restoration costs (as part of ‘trade and other payables’) totalling approximately AU$36,000 with an additional amount of AU$114,000 disclosed as a contingent liability[7] (but not reported as a liability). This represents an estimate of the present value of the expenditure required to settle the rehabilitation and restoration obligation.
Alice Queen’s reported net asset backing as at 31 December 2023 is approximately AU$950,000 which is primarily comprised of net cash resources and excludes the market value of its mineral assets.
5 Director’s Report dated 13 March 2024 (as part of AQX’s Interim Financial Report for the Half-Year ended 31 December 2023)
6 Appendix 5B for the quarterly cash flow report for the quarter ended 31 March 2024
7 Note 8 ‘Contingent assets and liabilities’ of AQX’s Interim Financial Report for the Half-Year ended 31 December
2023
19
==> picture [75 x 26] intentionally omitted <==
6.5 Operating performance
AQX’s consolidated statements of profit or loss and other comprehensive income for the financial years ended 30 June 2022 (FY22) and 2023 (FY23) and the six months to 31 December 2023 (HY FY24) are presented in the table below.
Table 6
| Alice Queen Limited | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Consolidated Statement of Profit or Loss and | |||
| Other Comprehensive Income | Audited | Audited | Reviewed |
| AU$ | FY22 | FY23 | HY FY24 |
| Revenue | 105 | 3,289 | 2,307 |
| Expenses | |||
| Other operating expenses | (408,705) | (411,921) | (225,491) |
| Compliance costs | (176,832) | (157,530) | (96,375) |
| Consultancy expenses | (138,145) | (228,077) | (180,462) |
| Depreciation & amortisation | (160,717) | (88,450) | (11,855) |
| Employee benefits, management fees and on costs | (831,809) | (535,103) | (240,483) |
| Impairment expense | (6,401,401) | (17,596,400) | - |
| Exploration expenditure | - | (884,770) | (238,201) |
| Lease amortisation | - | - | (32,674) |
| Interest on leased assets | (4,780) | (2,451) | - |
| Interest on convertible note | - | (102,255) | (270,633) |
| Other costs | (119,134) | (59,245) | (57,827) |
| Loss before income tax | (8,241,418) | (20,062,913) | (1,351,694) |
| Loss of non-controllinginterest | 657,220 | 2,821,473 | 36,801 |
| Loss attributable to parent entity shareholders | (7,584,198) | (17,241,440) | (1,314,893) |
| Other comprehensive income (investments) | 41,252 | - | - |
| Other comprehensive income, net of tax | 14,400 | - | - |
| Total comprehensive loss | (7,528,546) | (17,241,440) | (1,314,893) |
Source: AQX’s Annual Report for the financial years ended 30 June 2022 and 2023, AQX’s Interim Financial Report for the half-year ended 31 December 2023
Numbers in the table may not reconcile to the nearest dollar with the financial statements due to rounding.
20
==> picture [75 x 26] intentionally omitted <==
6.6 Cash flow statements
AQX’s consolidated statements of cash flows for FY22, FY23 and HY FY24 are presented in the table below.
Table 7
| Alice Queen Limited | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows | Audited | Audited | Reviewed |
| AU$ | FY22 | FY23 | HY FY24 |
| Cash flows from operating activities | |||
| Payments to suppliers | (1,250,404) | (1,148,833) | (1,082,547) |
| Payments for exploration and evaluation expenditure | - | (847,361) | (218,026) |
| Interest received | 105 | 3,289 | 2,307 |
| Interest paid | (4,786) | (2,707) | (58,385) |
| Net cash used in operating activities | (1,255,085) | (1,995,612) | (1,356,651) |
| Cash flows from investing activities | |||
| Payments for exploration and evaluation expenditure | (3,398,092) | (657,785) | - |
| Payments for property, plant and equipment | - | (16,253) | - |
| Proceeds from government grants | 96,401 | - | - |
| Security deposits refunded | 238,000 | 10,000 | 60,000 |
| Payment for acquisition of Fiji tenements | (10,000) | - | - |
| Payments for security deposits | (24,589) | (43,161) | - |
| Proceeds from sale of investment | 95,652 | - | - |
| Net cash used in investing activities | (3,002,628) | (707,199) | 60,000 |
| Cash flows from financing activities | |||
| Proceeds from issue of shares | 3,805,040 | 2,215,429 | 2,993,142 |
| Proceeds from borrowings | - | - | 400,000 |
| Proceeds from convertible notes | - | 400,000 | - |
| Repayment of convertible notes | - | - | (400,000) |
| Lease payments | - | - | (32,118) |
| Principal lease repayments | (130,522) | (60,860) | - |
| Payments for share issue costs | (243,286) | (127,934) | (144,903) |
| Net cash from financing activities | 3,431,232 | 2,426,635 | 2,816,121 |
| Net (decrease)/increase in cash held and cash equivalents | (826,481) | (276,176) | 1,519,470 |
| Cash and cash equivalents at the beginning of the period | 1,161,376 | 333,673 | 41,934 |
| Effects of exchange rate on cash and cash equivalents | (1,222) | (15,563) | (654) |
| Cash and cash equivalents at the end of the period | 333,673 | 41,934 | 1,560,750 |
Source: AQX’s Annual Report for the financial years ended 30 June 2022 and 2023, AQX’s Interim Financial Report for the half-year ended 31 December 2023
Numbers in the table may not reconcile to the nearest dollar with the financial statements due to rounding.
21
==> picture [75 x 26] intentionally omitted <==
7. Valuation of AQX shares before the Proposed Issue
7.1 Value definition
PKF Corporate’s valuation of Alice Queen is on the basis of ‘fair market value’, defined as:
‘the price that could be realized in an open market over a reasonable period of time given the current market conditions and currently available information, assuming that potential buyers have full information, in a transaction between a willing but not anxious seller and a willing but not anxious buyer acting at arm’s length’.
7.2 Valuation methodologies
In selecting appropriate valuation methodologies to assess the value of Alice Queen, we considered the applicability of a range of generally accepted valuation methodologies. Each methodology is described in detail in Appendix C of the IER.
7.3 Share price history
As the share price history of AQX will incorporate all publicly available information, we consider that the share price history is an appropriate methodology to use in assessing the value of a AQX share.
We note that the Proposed Issue was announced to the ASX on 8 April 2024 following a trading halt that took effect on 5 April 2024. We normally analyse the share price up to a date immediately prior to the date when a takeover, merger or other significant transaction is announced to remove any price speculation or price escalations that may have occurred subsequent to the announcement of any proposed transaction.
Whilst we have only assessed the share price of Alice Queen up to and including 4 April 2024 (the last trading day prior to the trading halt in respect of the Proposed Issue), to show the impact of the Proposed Issue we have presented the share price of Alice Queen up to a more recent date (3 May 2024) as the period between the announcement of the Proposed Issue and a more recent date shows the reaction of the market to the Proposed Issue and this has been taken into account in assessing the reasonableness of the Proposed Issue in Section 10 of the IER.
22
==> picture [75 x 26] intentionally omitted <==
We have set out below a graph showing the daily closing share price and the volume of AQX shares traded up to and including 3 May 2024 as well as a selection of market sensitive announcements on the ASX.
Graph 1
==> picture [511 x 328] intentionally omitted <==
Source: ASX, PKF Corporate analysis
We provide the following comments in respect to our key observations of the trading activity in AQX shares:
-
Following the 14 November 2023 announcement to the ASX of the reinstatement of AQX shares to quotation and Alice Queen’s capital raising initiatives (refer to Section 6.3 of the IER, in particular the terms of the placement and rights issue completed during December 2023), Alice Queen’s share price closed within a range of AU$0.005 to AU$0.008 per AQX share during the period 14 November 2023 to 3 April 2024 (being the last traded price prior to the announcement of the trading halt that took effect on 5 April 2024).
-
During this period, AQX shares experienced periods of increased trading volume and value (notably during early December 2023, early to mid-January 2024 and early to mid-February 2024). There is no clear explanation for the increased trading volume and value in AQX shares during these periods.
23
==> picture [75 x 26] intentionally omitted <==
- Prior to the 5 April 2024 trading halt, AQX shares last traded on 3 April 2024 and closed at a price of AU$0.005 per AQX share.
Following the 8 April 2024 announcement to the ASX of the Proposed Issue and the recommencement of trading in AQX shares, AQX shares experienced an increase in trading volume and value (in particular on 8 and 9 April 2024).
Alice Queen’s share price closed within a range of AU$0.005 and AU$0.007 per AQX share during the period 8 April 2024 to 3 May 2024. During this period, 121.8 million AQX shares traded of which approximately 30.66 million or approximately 25% related to Finico[8] which were acquired on-market from 8 April 2024 to 19 April 2024 (excluding an additional 10 million AQX shares acquired by Finico after 3 May 2024).
- We examined the recent share prices and trading volumes in Alice Queen shares up to and including 4 April 2024 (the last trading day prior to the trading halt in respect of the Proposed Issue) including the volume weighted average price (“ VWAP ”) of AQX shares based on closing daily prices on the ASX for business trading dates. We have set out our analysis in the table below.
Table 8
| Alice Queen Limited Share price analysis |
VWAP Number Value AU$ AU$ Low High Shares Traded Share Price AU$ |
|---|---|
| 5 days to 4 April 2024 10 days to 4 April 2024 20 days to 4 April 2024 30 days to 4 April 2024 60 days to 4 April 2024 |
12,343,399 61,717 0.005 0.005 0.006 15,412,654 79,922 0.005 0.005 0.006 35,631,182 196,703 0.006 0.005 0.006 38,777,333 212,661 0.005 0.005 0.006 159,032,813 902,892 0.006 0.005 0.007 |
Source: ASX, PKF Corporate analysis
As can be seen from the above table, the VWAP of Alice Queen shares ranged between AU$0.005 to AU$0.006 and traded in a range of AU$0.005 to AU$0.007 over the preceding periods leading up to and including 4 April 2024.
During the 5 and 10 day trading periods up to and including 4 April 2024, Alice Queen shares traded on average on approximately 40% of the available trading days during each period. During the 20, 30 and 60 day trading periods up to and including 4 April 2024, Alice Queen shares traded on average on approximately 67% of the available trading days during each period.
8 ASX announcements dated 15 April 2024 and 10 May 2024 ‘Change in substantial holding’
24
==> picture [75 x 26] intentionally omitted <==
As at 4 April 2024, a total of 690,990,068 AQX Ordinary Shares were on issue. We have analysed the volume of shares traded in Alice Queen over the past 60 trading days up to and including 4 April 2024 of the ‘free float’ only. We have set out our analysis in the table below.
Table 9
==> picture [510 x 77] intentionally omitted <==
----- Start of picture text -----
Alice Queen Limited % of free float traded
Share volume analysis 5 days 10 days 20 days 30 days 60 days
Number of shares traded to 4 April 2024 12,343,399 15,412,654 35,631,182 38,777,333 159,032,813
AQX free float1 345,825,040 3.57% 4.46% 10.30% 11.21% 45.99%
----- End of picture text -----
Source: ASX, PKF Corporate analysis
1 The ‘free float’ of AQX Ordinary Shares as sourced from S&P Capital IQ which considers shares held by ‘employees, individual insiders and strategic investors’ totalling 230,943,752 as at 4 April 2024 (which excludes the additional AQX shares acquired by Finico on-market[8] after 4 April 2024). These shares also exclude those held by Ms Niu prior to the announcement of the Proposed Issue (114,221,276) who we consider to be a strategic investor and, as such, should be excluded from the calculation of the ‘free float’ of AQX Ordinary Shares as at 4 April 2024. Accordingly, the ‘free float’ of AQX Ordinary Shares as at 4 April 2024 is 345,825,040 representing approximately 50% of the total AQX Ordinary Shares on issue as at 4 April 2024. The ‘free float’ may be lower or higher dependant on those shareholders who may or may not be considered strategic shareholders in Alice Queen.
Based on the above analysis, approximately 5.6% of the ‘free float’ of AQX Ordinary Shares is traded every 10 trading days on average over the periods leading up to and including 4 April 2024.
Based on the above comments and analysis, we have formed the view that the market in Alice Queen’s shares is sufficiently liquid and active, and, for this reason, we consider that the share price valuation methodology is appropriate to adopt as a valuation methodology to assess the market value of AQX shares for the purpose of the Proposed Issue.
After consideration of our analysis of the Alice Queen shares leading up to and including 4 April 2024, we have formed the opinion that the Alice Queen shares have a market value in the range of AU$0.005 to AU$0.006 per AQX share on a minority basis.
25
==> picture [75 x 26] intentionally omitted <==
The share prices upon which we have formed our opinion reflect the prices at which minority parcels of shares are traded on a daily basis and, as such, do not incorporate a control premium. Accordingly, we have considered the application of a control premium which represents the difference between the price that would have to be paid for a share to which a controlling interest attaches and the price at which a share which does not carry with it control of Alice Queen could be acquired.
In assessing the control premium to be applied to the share price of Alice Queen, we have considered the following:
-
The existing capital structure of Alice Queen (refer to Section 6.3 of the IER) where the three major shareholders hold approximately 45% of the shares on issue in Alice Queen. Accordingly, there is a limited prospect of any new shareholder obtaining control of Alice Queen (even via a placement or unless either Gage, Ms Niu or Finico was to sell down its shareholding).
-
The relevant matrix from the RSM Control Premium Study – 2021 applicable to Alice Queen and the Proposed Issue (cash consideration type). We have summarised this research in the table below.
Table 10
| Analysis by Criteria |
Control premium 20 days pre-announcement |
|---|---|
| Average Median |
|
| All transactions Industry Metals & Mining Consideration type Cash Size ≤$25m |
34.7% 27.5% 36.6% 31.0% 36.2% 28.6% 50.8% n/a |
Source: RSM Control Premium Study 2021
- The actual control premium paid is transaction specific and depends on a range of factors, such as the level of synergies available to the purchaser, the level of competition for the assets and the strategic importance of the assets.
We note that the above referenced research (the RSM Control Premium Study – 2021) sets out statistical information about actual control premia paid and, as such, includes an unknown uplift on account of potential acquisition synergy benefits. We are of the opinion that the control premium in a transaction that did not include expected synergies would be lower.
26
==> picture [75 x 26] intentionally omitted <==
After considering the above, we have applied a control premium in a range of 25% to 30% to the minority share price of one Alice Queen share in a range of AU$0.005 to AU$0.006 per AQX share. We have summarised the results of this calculation in the table below.
Table 11
==> picture [371 x 102] intentionally omitted <==
----- Start of picture text -----
Alice Queen Limited
Share price methodology Low High
Value per AQX share (minority) AU$0.005 AU$0.006
Control premium 25.0% 30.0%
Value per AQX share (control) AU$0.006 AU$0.008
----- End of picture text -----
Having regard to the above, we have concluded that the control value of an Alice Queen share is in a range of AU$0.006 to AU$0.008 per AQX share as assessed under the share price valuation methodology.
7.4 Capitalisation of future maintainable earnings
As Alice Queen does not currently undertake any profitable mining activities, we consider that the capitalisation of maintainable earnings methodology is not an appropriate methodology to use to value Alice Queen or an AQX share at this point in time.
7.5 Net present value of future cash flows
Alice Queen does not currently undertake any profitable mining activities and has no near term planned mining activities with available long-term cash flow forecasts that can be used to value Alice Queen or any of its projects in particular its most advanced project, being the ‘Horn Island Project’. Accordingly, we consider that the net present value of future cash flows methodology cannot be used as there is insufficient certainty that any cash flows can be derived from the assets of Alice Queen at this point in time.
7.6 Asset based methods
As at 31 December 2023, Alice Queen reported net assets as per the reviewed statement of financial position of approximately AU$950,000 (refer to Section 6.4 of the IER).
In considering the applicability of assessing the value of Alice Queen based on a net assets approach, we have considered the following:
- The underlying value per AQX share based on Alice Queen’s reported net assets as at 31 December 2023 is approximately AU$0.0014 per AQX share (on a control basis). This represents a significant discount (approximately 78%) when compared to the 30 day VWAP of an AQX share (on a control basis after applying a 25% control premium).
27
==> picture [75 x 26] intentionally omitted <==
Accordingly, the market is placing a significant premium to the reported net assets of Alice Queen as the reported net assets do not attribute any value to its mineral assets (as described in Section 6.1 of the IER).
-
Alice Queen’s net assets do not attribute any value to its mineral assets which are the basis for Alice Queen’s mineral exploration activities, and which may have potential upside value.
-
Alice Queen’s Interim Financial Report for the half-year ended 31 December 2023 was prepared on a going concern basis[9] .
Having regard to the above comments, we have considered the assessment of the value of Alice Queen under the net assets approach and we have presented our adjustments and analysis in the table below and the corresponding notes. We have assumed there have been no other material changes to Alice Queen’s other assets or liabilities other than those addressed.
Table 12
| Alice Queen Limited | Low | High | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Net Asset Approach | note | AU$ | AU$ |
| Reported net assets as at 31 December 2023 | 948,435 | 948,435 | |
| Adjustments | |||
| Cash adjustment - March Quarter 2024 | 1 | (1,097,000) | (1,097,000) |
| Borrowings | 1 | 400,000 | 400,000 |
| Mineral Assets | 2 | 12,310,000 | 16,660,000 |
| Adjusted Net Assets | 12,561,435 | 16,911,435 |
Note 1: During the quarter ended March 2024, Alice Queen reported net cash outflows of approximately AU$1.097 million resulting in a reduction to Alice Queen’s cash position. Part of the net cash outflow was used to repay borrowings. We have adjusted the net assets of Alice Queen accordingly. We have not adjusted for the additional cash raised from the exercise of 5,938 AQXOC options on 4 April 2024 as it is not material.
Note 2: We have engaged SRK to assist us in assessing the market value of Alice Queen’s portfolio of mineral assets. A fully copy of the SRK Specialist Report is set out as Attachment 1 of the IER.
9 Note 4 ‘Going concern basis’ of AQX’s Interim Financial Report for the Half-Year ended 31 December 2023
28
==> picture [75 x 26] intentionally omitted <==
We have reviewed the SRK Specialist Report and note that SRK has ascribed a preferred value of AU$16.78 million to Alice Queen’s mineral assets with a low and high valuation range of AU$11.08 million and AU$22.47 million. We have presented in the table below a summary of the SRK technical valuation ranges ascribed to Alice Queen’s mineral assets (after adjusting for the interest held in each mineral asset by Alice Queen).
Table 13
| Alice Queen Limited | Interest | Low | Preferred | High |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Technical values1 | held | AU$ | AU$ | AU$ |
| Horn Island | 84.5% | 7,807,800 | 11,728,600 | 15,649,400 |
| Kaiwalagal | 84.5% | 160,550 | 236,600 | 312,650 |
| Yarindury | 90.0% | 405,000 | 675,000 | 936,000 |
| Mendooran | 90.0% | 144,000 | 225,000 | 315,000 |
| Byrock | 100.0% | 160,000 | 250,000 | 330,000 |
| Gongolgon | 100.0% | 140,000 | 220,000 | 290,000 |
| Viani | 100.0% | 30,000 | 40,000 | 50,000 |
| Nabila | 100.0% | 700,000 | 1,090,000 | 1,490,000 |
| Sabeto | 100.0% | 10,000 | 20,000 | 30,000 |
| Total Technical Value1 | 9,557,350 | 14,485,200 | 19,403,050 |
Source: SRK Technical Report
1 SRK technical values have been adjusted to represent the interest held in each mineral asset by Alice Queen. Refer to Section 6.1 of the IER for further details.
Given the resultant wide low and high range provided by SRK in respect to the ‘Horn Island Project’, we have adopted the technical preferred value of say AU$11.73 million (after adjusting for the 84.5% interest held in this mineral asset by Alice Queen). In our opinion, the provision of a single value does not appropriately reflect the uncertainty inherent in any valuation. To allow for this uncertainty, we have used a range of plus and minus 10% around the preferred value of the ‘Horn Island Project’ to develop a range of say AU$10.56 million to AU$12.90 million.
We have adopted the low and high range provided by SRK for all other mineral asset projects.
Having regard to the above comments and analysis, we have formed the view that the value of
Alice Queen is in a range of say AU$12.6 million to AU$16.9 million, under the net assets valuation methodology. The resultant control value of a AQX share is in a range of say AU$0.018 to AU$0.024 per AQX share.
29
==> picture [75 x 26] intentionally omitted <==
As the Company has existing cash resources, financial support from its major shareholders and an ability to raise capital as demonstrated by the recent capital raisings completed during November and December 2023, we do not consider that an orderly realisation or liquidation of the Company’s assets is an appropriate valuation methodology to use in assessing the value of Alice Queen or an AQX share at this point in time.
7.7 Comparable market transactions
In considering the application of this methodology, we have considered Alice Queen’s interests in its projects based in Australia and Fiji. Whilst there are no directly comparable market transactions as Alice Queen’s exploration and mining assets are unique, there are other comparable companies focused on mineral exploration in or around the location of Alice Queen’s projects. However, there is limited comparability between the various companies that own mineral assets in locations nearby to Alice Queen’s projects due to the difference in the mineral geology such as commodity type, size and quality of deposits, stage of development, regulatory approvals and licences, and the ability of the companies to advance the development of their projects by obtaining the necessary funding and technical support.
For the above reasons, the comparable market transactions valuation methodology is not an appropriate methodology to use to directly value Alice Queen or an AQX share.
Although we do not consider that the comparable market transactions valuation methodology is an appropriate methodology to use to directly value Alice Queen or an AQX share, the comparable market transactions valuation methodology has been considered by SRK in forming their opinion of the value of Alice Queen’s mineral assets (as set out in Section 7.6 of the IER which we have relied upon).
7.8 Alternative acquirer
We are aware that Alice Queen received and progressed separate offers for two (2) of its projects during late 2023. The details of such offers have not been disclosed as they are considered commercial-in-confidence. These offers were terminated by Alice Queen as a result of Gage’s interest in financially supporting Alice Queen by subscribing for new AQX shares. As these offers only related to two (2) of Alice Queen’s projects, we are unable to derive a value of Alice Queen or an AQX share from these offers however they have been considered by SRK in forming their opinion of the value of such projects of Alice Queen.
30
==> picture [75 x 26] intentionally omitted <==
Since the emergence of Gage as a major shareholder of Alice Queen, we are not aware of any formal offers for the AQX shares nor any of its other assets and we can see no reason as to why an offer would be initiated at this time without the consent and support of the major shareholders, in particular Gage, of Alice Queen.
- 7.9 Conclusion
In assessing the value of an AQX share (on a control basis) before the Proposed Issue, we considered the results of the share price history valuation methodology in a range of AU$0.006 to AU$0.008 per AQX share with a mid-point of AU$0.007 per AQX share (as set out in Section 7.3 of the IER) and the results of the net assets valuation methodology in a range of AU$0.018 to AU$0.024 per AQX share with a mid-point of AU$0.0210 per AQX share (as set out in Section 7.6 of the IER).
The valuation of an AQX share (on a control basis) derived from the share price history valuation methodology is significantly lower than that derived from the net assets valuation methodology. We provide the following comments:
-
The results of the share price history valuation methodology reflect the share trading activity in Alice Queen shares prior to the announcement of the Proposed Issue. The results of the net assets valuation methodology reflect the technical values of all of Alice Queen’s mineral assets. The mid-point of the valuation range from the share price history valuation methodology (AU$0.007 per AQX share) is approximately 67% lower than the mid-point valuation range from the net assets valuation methodology (AU$0.0210 per AQX share).
-
As can be seen from Graph 1 in Section 7.3 of the IER, Alice Queen shares were suspended in early October 2023 and remained suspended until mid-November 2023. During the period of suspension, it became clear that Alice Queen did not have sufficient funds available to continue its operations. Prior to the re-commencement of trading, Alice Queen announced the Gage placement at an issue price of AU$0.014 per AQX share and a placement and rights issue at an issue price of AU$0.005 per AQX share (refer to Section 6.3 of the IER for further details). The placement and rights issue were at a deep discount to the share price prior to the suspension.
31
==> picture [75 x 26] intentionally omitted <==
Whilst the results of the share price history valuation methodology (AU$0.006 to AU$0.008 per AQX share on a control basis) are above the issue price under the placement and rights issue, the Alice Queen share price has not yet recovered to the levels experienced prior to the suspension. We consider that this reflects an anticipation from the market that Alice Queen will need to raise additional cash to continue to advance exploration activities and any such capital raising will be at a discount. For this reason, the share price history valuation methodology may not provide a fair assessment of the underlying value of an Alice Queen share.
Having regard to the above, we have elected to prefer the net assets valuation methodology as it fully reflects the value of Alice Queen’s mineral assets, and we have concluded that the value of an AQX share before the Proposed Issue is in a range of AU$0.018 to AU$0.024 per AQX share on a control basis .
32
==> picture [75 x 26] intentionally omitted <==
- Valuation of AQX shares after the Proposed Issue
The value of Alice Queen after the Proposed Issue will comprise of its value before the Proposed Issue together with the value of the cash to be raised pursuant to the Proposed Issue. We have set out in the table below our assessment of the value of an AQX Ordinary Share after the Proposed Issue on a minority basis.
Table 14
| Alice Queen Limited | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Valuation after the Proposed Issue | section | formula | Low | High |
| Value of an AQX share before the Proposed Issue (control basis) | 7.9 | a | AU$0.018 | AU$0.024 |
| Total AQX Ordinary Shares on issue before the Proposed Issue | 6.3 | b | 690,990,068 | 690,990,068 |
| Value of AQX before the Proposed Issue (control basis) | c = a x b | AU$12,437,821 | AU$16,583,762 | |
| Shares to be issued if the Proposed Issue is approved | 2.1 | d | 455,900,000 | 455,900,000 |
| Issue price | 2.1 | e | AU$0.008 | AU$0.008 |
| Funds to be received if the Proposed Issue is approved | f = d x e | AU$3,647,200 | AU$3,647,200 | |
| Value of AQX after the Proposed Issue (control basis) | g = c + f | AU$16,085,021 | AU$20,230,962 | |
| Control premium elimination to obtain minority value | Note 1 | h | 23.1% | 20.0% |
| Value of AQX after the Proposed Issue (minority basis) | i = g x (1 - h) | AU$12,369,381 | AU$16,184,770 | |
| Total AQX Ordinary Shares on issue after the Proposed Issue | 2.3 | j = b + d | 1,146,890,068 | 1,146,890,068 |
| Value of an AQX share after the Proposed Issue (minority basis) | k = i / j | AU$0.011 | AU$0.014 |
Share prices in the above table have been rounded to the nearest 0.1 cent. Values in the above table have been rounded to the nearest dollar.
1 to estimate the minority value of an AQX share, we have eliminated the premium for control from the valuation range of AQX before the Proposed Issue on a control basis. In Section 7.3 of the IER, we selected a control premium in a range of 25% to 30% and the equivalent minority discount is in a range of 23.1% to 20%.
In our opinion, after completion of the Proposed Issue, the value of an AQX Ordinary Share will be in a range of say AU$0.011 to AU$0.014 on a minority basis, with a mid-point of say AU$0.0125 .
33
==> picture [75 x 26] intentionally omitted <==
- Assessment as to Fairness
The Proposed Issue is “fair” if the value of the minority shares held by the Non-Associated Shareholders in AQX after the Proposed Issue is equal to or greater than the control value of the shares held by the Non-Associated Shareholders in AQX before the Proposed Issue.
In Section 7 of the IER, we assessed the value of an AQX Ordinary Share on a control basis before the Proposed Issue to be in a range of AU$0.018 to AU$0.024 per AQX share, with a mid-point of AU$0.021 per AQX share. In Section 8 of the IER, we assessed the value of an AQX Ordinary Share on a minority basis after the Proposed Issue to be in a range of AU$0.011 to AU$0.014 per AQX share, with a mid-point of say AU$0.0125 per AQX share.
As the minority value mid-point (AU$0.0125) of an AQX Ordinary Share after the Proposed Issue is less than the control value mid-point (AU$0.021) of an AQX Ordinary Share before the Proposed Issue, we have concluded that the Proposed Issue is not fair.
- Assessment as to Reasonableness
Prior to deciding whether to approve or reject the Proposed Issue, the Non-Associated Shareholders of Alice Queen should also consider the following significant factors:
Advantages
-
The issue price of the new AQX Ordinary Shares subject to the Proposed Issue is at a premium of 60% compared to the closing share price of an AQX share on 3 April 2024 (AU$0.005 being the last traded price in an AQX share prior to the announcement of the Proposed Issue) and also a premium of approximately 60% compared to the closing share price of an AQX share on 3 May 2024 (AU$0.005). Accordingly, this premium (calculated by reference to share prices at which AQX shares traded on the ASX) effectively represents the control premium paid for Gage to increase its voting power.
-
If the Non-Associated Shareholders approve the Proposed Issue, the consolidation of Gage as a major shareholder of Alice Queen may provide a level of market confidence and may also financially support the future exploration and development activities of Alice Queen. Gage has indicated that it has no intention to change the strategic direction of Alice Queen, its employment level or management team (other than appointing Mr Wang Jianying as a Director) and Gage has indicated it has no present intention to inject further capital into Alice Queen unless in connection with its future participation right (refer further to ‘Annexure C – Statement of Intentions – Gage’ of the Notice).
34
==> picture [75 x 26] intentionally omitted <==
- Approval of the Proposed Issue will allow Alice Queen to deploy the additional cash resources raised towards the exploration activities of Alice Queen’s mineral assets, in particular Alice Queen’s intention to advance its portfolio of mineral assets in Fiji, in order to unlock any potential upside value for shareholders.
Disadvantages
-
In Section 9 of the IER, we assessed the Proposed Issue as being not fair.
-
If the Non-Associated Shareholders approve the Proposed Issue, Gage may control up to 51.0% of Alice Queen’s voting power, an increase from 18.67%. As a result, the stake of the Non-Associated Shareholders will be diluted from 81.33% to 49.0% and they will have reduced ability to influence the operating, financing and strategic direction of Alice Queen.
Further, as Gage’s voting power will increase beyond 50% it will be able to determine the outcome of ordinary resolutions in general meetings of the Company’s shareholders (where Gage is not otherwise excluded from voting) and, as such, Gage may have the capacity to have significant influence over the passing of ordinary resolutions that may have a material impact on Alice Queen and its business.
Further, as Gage’s voting power will increase beyond 25% it may have the capacity to block the passing of a special resolution.
- If the Non-Associated Shareholders approve the Proposed Issue, Gage will also have the right to appoint a second director to the Board of the Company (proposed to be Mr Wang Jianying with effect on and from completion of the Proposed Issue) and, as such, this will result in Gage having two (2) representatives on the Board of the Company (the existing representative being Mr Michele Alessandro Bina) and/or holding 40% of the Board seats. This may further improve the ability of Gage to influence the operating, financing and strategic direction of Alice Queen.
Other factors
-
The issue price (AU$0.008) of the new AQX Ordinary Shares subject to the Proposed Issue is at a premium to the issue price of an AQX share conducted under the December 2023 placement and rights issue (completed at an issue price of AU$0.005 per AQX share including a free-attaching option), however, the issue price is at a discount to the issue price of an AQX share of AU$0.014 conducted under the placement to Gage during November 2023.
-
We have assessed Gage’s average entry price of an AQX share and presented our analysis in the table below. The issue price (AU$0.008) of the new AQX Ordinary Shares subject to the Proposed Issue is at a premium to Gage’s average entry price of AU$0.006 per AQX share.
35
==> picture [75 x 26] intentionally omitted <==
Table 15
| Gage Resource Development Pty Ltd | Placement & | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Average entry price analysis | Placement1 | Rights Issue1 | Total |
| Number of shares acquired | 18,977,226 | 110,000,000 | 128,977,226 |
| Price per AQX share (AU$) | 0.014 | 0.005 | |
| Consideration (AU$) | 265,681 | 550,000 | 815,681 |
| Average entry price of an AQX share2 | AU$0.006 |
1 November 2023 placement to Gage and the December 2023 placement and rights issue (refer to Section 6.3 of the IER).
2 Gage’s average entry price = total number of shares acquired by Gage divided by total consideration paid by Gage.
• If the Non-Associated Shareholders do not approve the Proposed Issue, Gage may be entitled to new AQX shares up to a maximum of 19.99% without seeking shareholder approval and without reliance on the ‘3% creep’ exception under item 9 of Section 611 of the Act. We have set out in the table below our analysis as to the maximum amount of shares which may be issued to Gage without the requirement for shareholder approval.
Table 16
| Alice Queen Limited | ||
|---|---|---|
| Gage voting power analysis | Current | Maximum |
| Number of AQX shares held by Gage | 128,977,226 | 140,454,226 |
| Total AQX shares on issue | 690,990,068 | 702,467,068 |
| Voting power of Gage | 18.67% | 19.99% |
As can be seen from the above, if the Proposed Issue is not approved and assuming no further shares are issued, Gage may subscribe for a maximum of approximately 11.477 million new AQX Ordinary Shares raising up to approximately AU$91,000 (at an issue price of AU$0.008 per AQX share).
• If the Non-Associated Shareholders do not approve the Proposed Issue, this may discourage Gage from providing further financial support to Alice Queen and Alice Queen may need to seek alternative funding to support its exploration activities (in particular minimum expenditure commitments to meet the conditions under which the mineral assets are granted) as well as working capital requirements.
Seeking alternative funding may require extensive management focus and expense to secure, which may leave Alice Queen without the resources to achieve its business plans. The availability of alternative funding may be on substantially less advantageous terms than the Proposed Issue and may be highly dilutive to existing shareholders in Alice Queen.
36
==> picture [75 x 26] intentionally omitted <==
-
If the Non-Associated Shareholders do not approve the Proposed Issue and should Gage wish to increase its voting power in Alice Queen, it can do so by acquiring shares on market. Although this may take Gage some time to acquire additional AQX shares and incur brokerage costs, Gage may be able to do so at a discount price to the issue price under the Proposed Issue. Such a scenario will not result in Alice Queen raising any additional cash resources which it can use towards its exploration activities.
-
The closing share prices of AQX shares during the period leading up to the announcement of the Proposed Issue were in a range of AU$0.005 to AU$0.006 per AQX share (refer to Section 7.3 of the IER). Prior to the announcement of the Proposed Issue, the AQX shares last closed at AU$0.007 per AQX share during January 2024 and at AU$0.008 per AQX share during November 2023.
If the Non-Associated Shareholders do not approve the Proposed Issue, the Alice Queen share price may continue to trade at existing levels without the prospect of any immediate alternative funding source.
-
The cash reserves of Alice Queen were less than AU$500,000 as at 31 March 2024. Alice Queen’s independent auditor’s review report set out in Alice Queen’s Interim Financial Report for the Half-Year ended 31 December 2023 raised a material uncertainty in relation to Alice Queen’s ability to continue as a going concern.
-
If the Non-Associated Shareholders do not approve the Proposed Issue, Alice Queen may be required to manage insufficient financial resources which will not enhance its ability to meet its ongoing working capital requirements and exploration commitments and remain solvent.
Based on the above significant factors, we consider that the advantages of the Proposed Issue outweigh the disadvantages of the Proposed Issue, and for this reason, we consider that the Proposed Issue is reasonable for the Non-Associated Shareholders.
- Assessment as to Fairness and Reasonableness
After considering the above matters, we have concluded that the Proposed Issue is not fair but is reasonable to the Non-Associated Shareholders .
37
==> picture [75 x 26] intentionally omitted <==
12. Financial Services Guide
This Financial Services Guide provides information to assist retail and wholesale investors in making a decision as to their use of the general financial product advice included in the above report.
12.1 PKF Corporate
PKF Corporate holds Australian Financial Services Licence No. 222050, authorizing it to provide general financial product advice in respect of securities to retail and wholesale investors.
12.2 Financial Services Offered by PKF Corporate
PKF Corporate prepares reports commissioned by a company or other entity (“ Entity ”). The reports prepared by PKF Corporate are provided by the Entity to its members.
All reports prepared by PKF Corporate include a description of the circumstances of the engagement and of PKF Corporate’s independence of the Entity commissioning the report and other parties to the transactions.
PKF Corporate does not accept instructions from retail investors. PKF Corporate provides no financial services directly to retail investors and receives no remuneration from retail investors for financial services. PKF Corporate does not provide any personal retail financial product advice directly to retail investors nor does it provide market-related advice to retail investors.
12.3 General Financial Product Advice
In the report, PKF Corporate provides general financial product advice. This advice does not take into account the personal objectives, financial situation or needs of individual retail investors.
Investors should consider the appropriateness of a report having regard to their own objectives, financial situation and needs before acting on the advice in a report. Where the advice relates to the acquisition or possible acquisition of a financial product, an investor should also obtain a product disclosure statement relating to the financial product and consider that statement before making any decision about whether to acquire the financial product.
38
==> picture [75 x 26] intentionally omitted <==
12.4 Independence
At the date of this report, none of PKF Corporate, Mr Stefan Galbo, Mr Steven Perri nor Mr Paul Lom have any interest in the outcome of the Proposed Issue, nor any relationship with Alice Queen Limited, Gage Resource Development Pty Ltd, and associated entities or any of their directors. Fees for this report are not contingent on the outcome, content or future use of this report.
An advanced draft of this report was provided to and discussed with the management of the Company and its advisors. Certain changes were made to factual statements in this report as a result of the reviews of the draft reports. There were no alterations to the methodology, valuations or conclusions that have been formed by PKF Corporate.
PKF Corporate and its related entities do not have any shareholding in or other relationship with the Company that could reasonably be regarded as capable of affecting its ability to provide an unbiased opinion in relation to the Proposed Issue.
PKF Corporate had no part in the formulation of the Proposed Issue. Its only role has been the preparation of this report.
PKF Corporate considers itself to be independent in terms of Regulatory Guide 112 issued by ASIC on 30 March 2011.
12.5 Remuneration
PKF Corporate is entitled to receive a fee of approximately AU$30,000 for the preparation of this report. With the exception of the above, PKF Corporate will not receive any other benefits, whether directly or indirectly, for or in connection with the making of this report.
12.6 Complaints Process
As the holder of an Australian Financial Services Licence, PKF Corporate is required to have suitable compensation arrangements in place. In order to satisfy this requirement PKF Corporate holds a professional indemnity insurance policy that is compliant with the requirements of Section 912B of the Act.
PKF Corporate is also required to have a system for handling complaints from persons to whom PKF Corporate provides financial services. All complaints should be in writing and sent to the Complaints Officer, PKF Corporate at Level 15, 500 Bourke Street, Melbourne VIC 3000.
39
==> picture [75 x 26] intentionally omitted <==
PKF Corporate will make every effort to resolve a complaint within 45 days of receiving the complaint. If the complaint has not been satisfactorily dealt with, the complaint can be referred to the Australian Financial Complaints Authority – GPO Box 3, Melbourne VIC 3001.
Yours faithfully
PKF Melbourne Corporate Pty Ltd
==> picture [97 x 43] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [68 x 43] intentionally omitted <==
Stefan Galbo Director
Steven Perri Director
40
Appendix A
==> picture [75 x 26] intentionally omitted <==
Sources of Information
The key documents and sources we have relied upon in preparing the IER are:
-
AQX’s Annual Report for the years ended 30 June 2022 and 2023;
-
AQX’s Half Year Report for the half year ended 31 December 2023;
-
AQX’s draft Notice of General Meeting and Explanatory Memorandum;
-
SRK Independent Specialist Report dated May 2024;
-
Research data from publicly accessible web sites in particular ASX announcements by the Company; and
-
Discussions with the management of the Company and its advisors.
41
Appendix B
==> picture [75 x 26] intentionally omitted <==
Declarations, Qualifications and Consents
1. Declarations
This report has been prepared at the request of the Independent Directors of Alice Queen Limited to accompany the notice of meeting of shareholders to approve the Proposed Issue pursuant to Section 606 of the Corporations Act 2001. It is not intended that this report should serve any purpose other than as an expression of our opinion as to whether or not the Proposed Issue is fair and reasonable.
In the preparation of this report, we have relied upon information concerning the Proposed Issue and Alice Queen Limited as provided to us and available in the public domain, which we believe, on reasonable grounds, to be reliable and not misleading.
The procedures that we performed and the enquiries that we made in the course of the preparation of this report do not include verification work nor constitute an audit in accordance with Australian Auditing Standards.
The statements and opinions included in this report are given in good faith and in the belief that such statements are not false and misleading.
To the extent that this report relies on prospective information, actual results may be different from the prospective information referred to in this report since the occurrence of anticipated events frequently do not occur as expected and the variation may be material. The achievement of the prospective information is dependent on the outcome of the assumptions. Accordingly, we express no opinion as to whether the prospective information will be achieved.
This report has also been prepared in accordance with the Accounting Professional and Ethical Standards Board professional standard APES 225 – Valuation Services.
2. Qualifications
Mr Stefan Galbo and Mr Steven Perri, Directors of PKF Corporate, prepared this report. They have been responsible for the preparation of expert reports and are involved in the provision of advice in respect of valuations, takeovers, capital reconstructions and reporting on all aspects thereof.
Mr Galbo is a Member of Chartered Accountants Australia and New Zealand (CAANZ) and an Accredited Business Valuation Specialist (CA BV Specialist).
42
==> picture [75 x 26] intentionally omitted <==
Mr Perri is a Member of Chartered Accountants Australia and New Zealand (CAANZ) and an Accredited Business Valuation Specialist (CA BV Specialist).
Mr Paul Lom, a consultant of PKF Corporate reviewed this report. Mr Lom is a Fellow of Chartered Accountants Australia and New Zealand (CAANZ) with more than 45 years experience in the accounting profession. He was a partner of KPMG and Touche Ross between 1989 and 1996, specialising in audit. He has extensive experience in business acquisitions, business valuations and privatisations in Australia and Europe.
3. Consent
PKF Corporate consents to the inclusion of this report in the form and context in which it is included in the Explanatory Memorandum.
43
Appendix C
==> picture [75 x 26] intentionally omitted <==
Valuation methodologies
Share price history
The share price history valuation methodology values a company based on the past trading in its shares.
Capitalisation of future maintainable earnings
Capitalisation of earnings is a method commonly used for valuing manufacturing and service companies and, in our experience, is the method most widely used by purchasers of such businesses. This method involves capitalising the earnings of a business at a multiple which reflects the risks of the business and its ability to earn future profits.
There are different definitions of earnings to which a multiple can be applied. The traditional method is to use net profit after tax. Another common method is to use Earnings Before Interest and Tax (EBIT) or Earnings Before Interest, Tax, Depreciation and Amortisation (EBITDA). One advantage of using EBIT or EBITDA is that it enables a valuation to be determined which is independent of the financing and tax structure of the business. Different owners of the same business may have different funding strategies and these strategies should not alter the fundamental value of the business.
Net present value of future cash flows
An analysis of the net present value of the projected cash flows of a business and/or asset (or discounted cash flow technique) is based on the premise that the value of the business and/or asset is the net present value of its future cash flows. This methodology requires an analysis of future cash flows, the capital structure, the costs of capital and an assessment of the residual value of the business and/or asset remaining at the end of the forecast period.
Asset Based Methods
This methodology is based on the realisable value of a company’s identifiable net assets. Asset based valuation methodologies include:
(a) Net assets
The net asset valuation methodology involves deriving the value of a company or business by reference to the value of its assets. This methodology is likely to be appropriate for a business whose value derives mainly from the underlying value of its assets rather than its earnings, such as property holding companies and investment businesses that periodically revalue their assets to market. The net assets on a going concern basis method estimates the market values of the net assets of a company but does not take account of realisation costs.
44
==> picture [75 x 26] intentionally omitted <==
- (b) Orderly realisation of assets
The orderly realisation of assets method estimates the fair market value by determining the amount that would be distributed to shareholders, after payment of all liabilities including realisation costs and taxation charges that arise, assuming the company is wound up in an orderly manner.
- (c) Liquidation of assets
The liquidation method is similar to the orderly realisation of assets method except the liquidation method assumes that the assets are sold in a short time frame.
Comparable market transactions
Industry specific methods estimate market values using rules of thumb for a particular industry. Generally, rules of thumb provide less persuasive evidence of the market value of an asset than other valuation methods because they may not account for specific factors.
Alternative acquirer
This methodology considers the value that an alternative bidder may be prepared to pay to acquire a business, asset or company.
45
Final
Independent Specialist Report on the Mineral Assets of Alice Queen Limited
Australia and Fiji
PKF Melbourne Corporate Pty Ltd
==> picture [425 x 247] intentionally omitted <==
SRK Consulting (Australasia) Pty Ltd ■ PKF004 ■ 27 May 2024
=rsrk consulting
Final
Independent Specialist Report on the Mineral Assets of Alice Queen Limited
Australia and Fiji
Prepared for:
PKF Melbourne Corporate Pty Ltd Level 15, 500 Bourke Street Melbourne, VIC, 3000 Australia
Prepared by:
SRK Consulting (Australasia) Pty Ltd Level 3, 18-32 Parliament Place West Perth, WA, 6005 Australia
+61 8 9288 2000 www.srk.com
ABN. 56 074 271 720
Lead Authors: Stephen Johnson, Carl D'Silva, Mathew Davies Initials: SJ, CD, MD Reviewer: Jeames McKibben Initials: JM
File Name:
PKF004_Alice Queen - Independent Specialist Report_Rev5.docx
Suggested Citation:
SRK Consulting (Australasia) Pty Ltd. 2024. Independent Specialist Report on the Mineral Assets of Alice Queen Limited. Final. Prepared for PKF Melbourne Corporate Pty Ltd: VIC 3000. Project number: PKF004. Issued 27 May 2024.
Cover Image:
Photograph of the Nabila Project Area, Fiji (provided by Alice Queen Limited)
Copyright© 2024
SRK Consulting (Australasia) Pty Ltd ■ PKF004 ■ 27 May 2024 srk consulting =,::
Acknowledgments
The following consultants have contributed to the preparation of this Report:
| Role | Name | Professional designation |
|---|---|---|
| Contributing Author | Lyn Takenaka | PhD (Geochemistr), DSc (Mineralogy and Petrology), MSc (Crustal Evolution |
| and Natural Resources), BSc (Geological Engineering) | ||
| Contributing Author | Graciany da Silva | MSc (Mineral Exploration and Mining Geology), BSc (Geology), MAIG |
| Contributing Author | Stephen Johnson | BSc Hons (Geology), MSEG, MAIG |
| Contributing Author | Mathew Davies | BSc (Hons), MAuslMM |
| Peer Review | Jeames McKibben | BSc (Hons), MBA, FAuslMM(CP), MAIG, MSME, MRICS |
| Corporate Sponsor | Carl D'Silva | BSc (Hons), Geology, MAuslMM, MAAPG, MPESA |
Disclaimer: The opinions expressed in this Report have been based on the information supplied to SRK Consulting (Australasia) Ply Ltd (SRK) by Alice Queen Limited (Alice Queen). The opinions in this Report are provided in response to a specific request from PKF Melbourne Corporate Ply Ltd (PKF) to do so. SRK has exercised all due care in reviewing the supplied information. While SRK has compared key supplied data with expected values, the accuracy of the results and conclusions from the review are entirely reliant on the accuracy and completeness of the supplied data. SRK does not accept responsibility for any errors or omissions in the supplied information and does not accept any consequential liability arising from commercial decisions or actions resulting from them. Opinions presented in this Report apply to the site conditions and features as they existed at the time of SRK's investigations, and those reasonably foreseeable. These opinions do not necessarily apply to conditions and features that may arise after the date of this Report, about which SRK had no prior knowledge nor had the opportunity to evaluate.
Independent Specialist Report on the Mineral Assets of Alice Queen Limited Contents ■ Final
Contents
| Contents | Contents |
|---|---|
| Useful Definitions ......................................................................................................................................................... ix | |
| Executive Summary ...................................................................................................................................................... 1 | |
| 1 | Introduction ......................................................................................................................................................... 3 |
| 1.1 | Terms of reference and purpose of the Report .................................................................................................. 3 |
| 1.2 | Scope of work ..................................................................................................................................................... 4 |
| 1.3 | Site visit ........................................................................................................................................... : .................. 4 |
| 1.4 | Compliance ......................................................................................................................................................... 4 |
| 1. 5 | Reporting standard ............................................................................................................................................. 5 |
| 1.6 | Work program ..................................................................................................................................................... 5 |
| 1. 7 1.8 |
Legal matters ...................................................................................................................: .................................. 6 Efective Date ..................................................................................................................................................... 6 |
| 1.9 | Project team ....................................................................................................................................................... 6 |
| 1.10 | Limitation, reliance on information, declaration and consent ............................................................................. 7 |
| 1.10.1 Limitations ........................................................................................................................................... 7 |
|
| 1.10.2 Statement of SRK independence ........................................................................................................ 7 |
|
| 1.10.3 Indemnities .......................................................................................................................................... 7 |
|
| 1.10.4 Competent Person and Practitioner consent ...................................................................................... 7 |
|
| 1.10.5 Units of measure and currency ........................................................................................................... 8 |
|
| 1.11 | Consulting fees ................................................................................................................................................... 8 |
| 1.12 | Structure of the Report ....................................................................................................................................... 8 |
| Part | A: Australian Mineral Assets ................................................................................................................................. 9 |
| 2 | Project Setting - Queensland ........................................................................................................................... 1 o |
| 2.1 | Location and infrastructure ............................................................................................................................... 1 0 |
| 2.1.1 Physiography and climate ................................................................................................................. 11 |
|
| 2.2 | Regional geology .............................................................................................................................................. 12 |
| 2.3 | Local geology ................................................................................................................................................... 13 |
| 2.4 | Previous exploration ......................................................................................................................................... 15 |
| 2.5 | Exploration activities ......................................................................................................................................... 16 |
| 2.6 | Mineral Resources ............................................................................................................................................ 17 |
| 2.7 | Exploration targets and prospectivity ............................................................................................................... 20 |
| 2.7.1 Horn Island project (EPM2552) ......................................................................................................... 20 |
|
| 2.7.2 Kaiwalagal project (EPM25418) .................................................... : ................................................... 24 |
|
| 2.8 | SRK's opinion ................................................................................................................................................... 25 |
| 3 | Project Setting - New South Wales ................................................................................................................. 26 |
| 3.1 | Location and infrastructure ............................................................................................................................... 26 |
| 3.1.1 Physiography and climate ................................................................................................................. 27 |
|
| 3.2 | Regional geology .............................................................................................................................................. 28 |
| 3.3 | Local geology ................................................................................................................................................... 29 |
| 3.4 | Previous exploration ......................................................................................................................................... 31 |
| 3.5 | Exploration activities ......................................................................................................................................... 33 |
| 3.6 | Mineral Resources ............................................................................................................................................ 33 |
| 3.7 | Exploration targets and prospectivity ............................................................................................................... 34 |
| 3.7.1 Yarindury project (EL8646) ............................................................................................................... 36 |
|
| 3.7.2 Mendooran project (EL8469) ............................................................................................................ 39 |
|
| 3.7.3 Byrock (EL9568) and Gongolgon (EL99569) projects ...................................................................... 41 |
SRK CONSULTING (AUSTRALASIA) PTY LTD ■ 27 MAY 2024 ■ SJ, CD, MD/JM
iv
Independent Specialist Report on the Mineral Assets of Alice Queen Limited Contents ■ Final
| 3.8 | SRK's opinion ................................................................................................................................................... 43 |
|---|---|
| Part | B: International Mineral Assets .......................................................................................................................... .44 |
| 4 | Project Setting - Fiji ......................................................................................................................................... .45 |
| 4.1 | Location and infrastructure .............................................................................................................................. .45 |
| 4.1.1 Physiography and climate ................................................................................................................ .46 |
|
| 4.2 | Regional geology ............................................................................................................................................. .47 |
| 4.3 | Local geology ................................................................................................................................................... 49 |
| 4.3.1 Viti Levu ............................................................................................................................................ 49 |
|
| 4.3.2 Vanua Levu ....................................................................................................................................... 50 |
|
| 4.4 | Previous exploration ......................................................................................................................................... 51 |
| 4.5 | Exploration activities ......................................................................................................................................... 53 |
| 4.6 | Mineral Resources ............................................................................................................................................ 53 |
| 4.7 | Exploration targets and prospectivity ............................................................................................................... 53 |
| 4. 7 .1 Nabila project (SPL 1514) .................................................................................................................. 53 |
|
| 4.7.2 Sabeto project (SPL 1518) ................................................................................................................. 57 |
|
| 4.7.3 Viani project(SPL1513) .................................................................................................................... 60 |
|
| 4.8 | SRK's opinion ................................................................................................................................................... 63 |
| Part | C: Valuation ......................................................................................................................................................... 6.6 |
| 5 | Other Considerations ........................................................................................................................................ 67 |
| 5.1 | Gold price ......................................................................................................................................................... 67 |
| 5.2 | Copper price ..................................................................................................................................................... 68 |
| 5.3 | Previous transactions ....................................................................................................................................... 69 |
| 5.3.1 Acquisition of Viti Mining Limited Pte (10 March 2021) .................................................................... 69 |
|
| 5.3.2 Acquisition of Sabeto by Viti Mining Limited Pte (2022) ................................................................... 70 |
|
| 5.3.3 Proposed farm-in by Newcrest on Mendooran (30 September 2017) ............................................. .70 5.3.4 Commercial in Confidence_Ofers_for Alice Queen Assets ............................................................... 70 |
|
| 5.4 | Previous valuations .......................................................................................................................................... 70 |
| 6 | Valuation ........................................................................................................................................................... 71 |
| 6.1 | Valuation basis ................................................................................................................................................. 73 |
| 6.2 | SRK's valuation technique ................................................................................................................................ 73 |
| 6.3 | Valuation of Resources .................................................................................................................................... 7 4 |
| 6.3.1 Comparable transactions - resource multiples ................................................................................. 7 4 |
|
| 6.3.2 Industry yardstick cross-check .......................................................................................................... 78 |
|
| 6.3.3 Summary of Mineral Resources valuation ........................................................................................ 79 |
|
| 6.4 | Valuation of exploration potential ..................................................................................................................... 79 |
| 6.4.1 Comparable market transactions - area multiples ........................................................................... 79 |
|
| 6.4.2 Geoscientific rating method .............................................................................................................. 84 |
|
| 6.4.3 Summary of exploration potential valuation ...................................................................................... 89 |
|
| 6. 5 | Valuation summary ........................................................................................................................................... 90 |
| References .................................................................................................................................................................. 94 |
SRK CONSULTING (AUSTRALASIA) PTY LTD ■ 27 MAY 2024 ■ SJ, CD, MD/JM
V
Independent Specialist Report on the Mineral Assets of Alice Queen Limited Contents ■ Final
| Tables | |
|---|---|
| Table 1.1: | Qualifications and experience of the project team ................................................................................... 6 |
| Table 2.1: | Status of Alice Queen's mineral tenures in Queensland as at the Valuation Date ................................ 10 |
| Table 2.2: | Summary of previous exploration -Horn Island tenement area ............................................................ 15 |
| Table 2.3: | Alice Queen's exploration activities by tenement -Queensland ........................................................... 16 |
| Table 3.1: | Status of Alice Queen's mineral tenures in New South Wales as at the Valuation Date ....................... 26 |
| Table 3.2: | Summary of previous exploration -New South Wales tenement areas ................................................ 31 |
| Table 3.3: | Alice Queen's exploration activities by tenement-New South Wales .................................................. 33 |
| Table 4.1: | Status of Alice Queen's mineral tenures in Fiji as at the Valuation Date .............................................. .45 |
| Table 4.2: | Summary of previous exploration -Nabila project (SPL 1514) .............................................................. 51 |
| Table 4.3: | Summary of previous exploration -Sabeto project (SPL 1518) ............................................................. 52 |
| Table 4.4: | Summary of previous exploration -Viani project (SPL 1513) ................................................................ 52 |
| Table 4.5: | Alice Queen's exploration activities by tenement -Fiji .......................................................................... 53 |
| Table 6.1: | Suggested valuation approaches according to development status ...................................................... 71 |
| Table 6.2: | SRK's adopted valuation basis .............................................................................................................. 73 |
| Table 6.3: | Resource-based transaction multiple analysis -Australia ..................................................................... 75 |
| Table 6.4: | Comparable transactions valuation of Alice Queen's Mineral Resources ............................................. 78 |
| Table 6.5: | Industry yardstick factors value range .................................................................................................... 78 |
| Table 6.6: | Industry yardstick valuation of Alice Queen's Mineral Resources ......................................................... 79 |
| Table 6.7: | SRK valuation summary-Resources ................................................................................................... 79 |
| Table 6.8: | Area-based transaction multiple analysis for gold projects -Australia .................................................. 82 |
| Table 6.9: | Area-based transaction multiple analysis for copper projects -Australia ............................................. 83 |
| Table 6.10: | Area-based transaction multiple analysis copper projects -Asia Pacific .............................................. 83 |
| Table 6.11: | Summary of exploration potential value using transactions analysis -100% attributable basis ........... 84 |
| Table 6.12: | Underlying assumption for base acquisition cost -Exploration Licence in Queensland ....................... 85 |
| Table 6.13: | Underlying assumptions for base acquisition cost -Exploration Licence in New South Wales ............ 85 |
| Table 6.14: | Underlying assumptions for base acquisition cost -Special Prospecting Licence in Fiji ...................... 85 |
| Table 6.15: | Modified property rating criteria .............................................................................................................. 87 |
| Table 6.16: | Geoscientific rating valuation of Alice Queen's tenure ........................................................................... 88 |
| Table 6.17: | Summary of exploration potential value using the geoscientific rating (Kilburn) method -Alice |
| Queen 100% attributable basis .............................................................................................................. 89 | |
| Table 6.18: | SRK valuation summary -exploration potential for Alice Queen .......................................................... 90 |
| Table 6.19: | Summary of the Market Value of the Mineral Assets of Alice Queen .................................................... 92 |
SRK CONSULTING (AUSTRALASIA) PTY LTD ■ 27 MAY 2024 ■ SJ, CD, MD/JM
vi
Independent Specialist Report on the Mineral Assets of Alice Queen Limited Contents ■ Final
Figures
Figure 1.1: Location of Alice Queen's projects ........................................................................................................... 3 Figure 2.1: Location of Torres Strait tenements in Queensland ............................................................................... 11 Figure 2.2: Regional geology of Torres Strait region showing extension of Kennedy Igneous Province ................ 13 Figure 2.3: Geology and mineral occurrences in Horn Island region ....................................................................... 14 Figure 2.4: Mineral Resource estimate (JORC Code 2012) for the Horn Island deposit and comparison with previous estimates .......................................................................................................................... 17 Figure 2.5: Location of historical pit and 2021 Mineral Resource estimate area - Horn Island project ................... 18 Figure 2.6: Leapfrog 3D cross section of the Mineral Resource estimate - Horn Island project... .......................... 19 Figure 2.7: DDIP survey and location of Southern Silicified Ridge prospect and Jedha 1 anomaly ........................ 21 Figure 2.8: Mineralisation in veins of altered granite porphyry chalcopyrite, arsenopyrite, pyrite and galena in drill hole 22NGD108 ........................................................................................................................... 22 Figure 2.9: Tatooine prospect area near the Horn Island deposit, with relevant drill hole gold assay results ......... 22 Figure 2.1 O: Alluvial gold target areas in Horn Island ................................................................................................. 23 Figure 2.11: Horn Island stockpiles and drill holes tested near the historical gold mine ............................................ 24 Figure 2.12: Magnetic geophysical anomalies interpreted as targets within the Kaiwalagal project tenements ............................................................................................................................................... 25 Figure 3.1: Location of Alice Queen's tenements in New South Wales ................................................................... 27 Figure 3.2: Macquarie Arc in the Eastern Lach Ian Orogen and the Lachlan Transverse Zone location ................. 29 Figure 3.3: Geological context of Yarindury and Mendooran projects ..................................................................... 30 Figure 3.4: Molong Volcanic Belt trend extension through Alice Queen's tenements ............................................. 35 Figure 3.5: Lachlan Orogen projects with location of Boda East shown .................................................................. 37 Figure 3.6: Mineralisation corridor identified in Boda East ....................................................................................... 38 Figure 3.7: Alteration and veining in mineralised zone at Boda East drill hole 20BEDH011 ................................... 39 Figure 3.8: Mendooran unconstrained 3D magnetic inversion and targets ............................................................ .40 Figure 3.9: Planned drill holes targeting residual total magnetic intensity with NW-NSE cross-arc structures ................................................................................................................................................ 41 Figure 3.1 O: Byrock and Gongolgon projects and adjacent tenements including Sky Metals' Doradilla REE project ..................................................................................................................................................... 42 Figure 3.11: Granodiorite with local pegmatite in Alice Queen's tenement .............................................................. .42 Figure 4.1: Location and access to Alice Queen's mineral projects in Fiji .................................................. :········ ... .46 Figure 4.2: Tectonic setting of the southwest Pacific and geological map of Fiji ..................................................... 48 Figure 4.3: Map showing major gold and copper-gold deposits and the Mineralised Gold Belt in Fiji .................... .49 Figure 4.4: Historical Mistry Mine and Faddy's prospect - Nabila project area ....................................................... 54 Figure 4.5: Detailed geological map of Faddy's prospect showing geochemically anomalous gold zones and drilling locations ............................................................................................................................... 55 Figure 4.6: Petrographic analysis from samples obtained from trench FT2 (left) and drill hole FAD001 (right) ...................................................................................................................................................... 56 Figure 4.7: Schematic mineral systems interpretation - Sabeto project area .......................................................... 57 Figure 4.8: Targets outlined by Alice Queen based on assay results from samples collected in the Sabeto project area ............................................................................................................................................ 58 Figure 4.9: Breccia with disseminated sulfides, sanidine feldspar porphyry boulders and samples/outcrops with visible copper, malachite, covellite and chalcopyrite ...................................................................... 59 Figure 4.1 O: Polymictic diatreme breccia with angular clasts, matrix supported, with mineralised veining cutting ..................................................................................................................................................... 60 Figure 4.11: JICA sampling, and gold and arsenic anomalies contoured in the Viani project area ........................... 61 Figure 4.12: Assay results for stream sediments in the Viani project targets ............................................................ 62 Figure 4.13: Sample 500125 from Chris Reef displaying vuggy silica texture ........................................................... 62 Figure 4.14: Sample location and best gold and silver assay values from rock chip sampling ................................. 63 Figure 4.15: 3D modelling and JORC Code 2012 compliant Mineral Resource estimate for the Faddy's prospect, including: a) diamond drilling dataset and assay results; and b) mineralisation
SRK CONSULTING (AUSTRALASIA) PTY LTD ■ 27 MAY 2024 ■ SJ, CD, MD/JM
Independent Specialist Report on the Mineral Assets of Alice Queen Limited Contents ■ Final
domain block model with blocks >0.5 git Au shown .............................................................................. 65 Figure 5.1 : Gold price ............................................................................................................................................... 68 Figure 5.2: Copper price ........................................................................................................................................... 69 Figure 6.1: Project value curve ................................................................................................................................. 75 Figure 6.2: Resource-based gold multiples -Australia ............................................................................................ 77 Figure 6.3: Resource-based gold multiples (focused on lower value multiples) -Australia .................................... 77 Figure 6.4: Area-based gold multiples for ML and PL tenure types -Australia ....................................................... 80 Figure 6.5: Area-based multiples for EL and mixed tenure types -Australia .......................................................... 81 Figure 6.6: Area-based copper multiples -Australia ............................................................................................... 81 Figure 6.7: Area-based copper multiples -Asia Pacific ........................................................................................... 82
viii
SRK CONSULTING (AUSTRALASIA) PTY LTD ■ 27 MAY 2024 ■ SJ, CD, MD/JM
Independent Specialist Report on the Mineral Assets of Alice Queen Limited Useful Definitions ■ Final
Useful Definitions
This list contains definitions of symbols, units, abbreviations, and terminology that may be unfamiliar to the reader.
| oc | temperature in degrees Celsius |
|---|---|
| 3D | three-dimensional |
| A$ | Australian dollars |
| MPG | American Association of Petroleum Geologists |
| Ag | silver |
| AIG | Australian Institute of Geoscientists |
| Alice Queen | Alice Queen Limited |
| ASX | Australian Securities Exchange |
| AtP | Authority to Prospect |
| Au | gold |
| AuslMM | Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy |
| Ba | barium |
| BAC | base acquisition cost |
| Bi | bismuth |
| Co | cobalt |
| Company | Alice Queen Limited |
| CP | Chartered Professional |
| Cu | copper |
| DCF | discounted cash flow |
| DDIP | dipole-dipole induced polarisation |
| EL | exploration licence |
| ELA | exploration licence application |
| EPM | Exploration Permit for Minerals |
| F | fluoride |
| g/t | grams per tonne |
| GML | Gold Mining Lease |
| IP | induced polarisation |
| ISR | independent specialist report |
| JICA | Japan International Cooperation Agency |
| JORC | Joint Ore Reserves Committee |
| JORC Code | Australasian Code for Reporing of Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves |
| JV | joint venture |
| K | potassium |
| kg | kilograms |
| km | kilometres |
| km2 | kilometres squared |
| koz | kilo ounces |
| m | metres |
| M | million |
| m2 | square metres |
| m3 | cubic metres |
| Ma | million years ago |
| MEE | multiples of exploration expenditure |
==> picture [5 x 81] intentionally omitted <==
SRK CONSUL TING (AUSTRALASIA) PTY LTD ■ 27 MAY 2024 ■ SJ, CD, MD/JM
ix
Independent Specialist Report on the Mineral Assets of Alice Queen Limited Useful Definitions ■ Final
| MLC | mining licence |
|---|---|
| mm | millimetres |
| Mm3 | million cubic metres |
| Mn | manganese |
| Mo | molybdenum |
| Mt | million tonnes |
| MTR | metal transaction ratio |
| oz | ounces |
| Pb | lead |
| PESA | Petroleum Society of Australia |
| PKF | PKF Melbourne Corporate Pty Ltd |
| ppm | parts per million |
| QA/QC | quality assurance-quality control |
| REE | rare earth elements |
| RICS | Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors |
| RTP | reduced to pole |
| Sn | tin |
| SPL | Special Prospecting Licence |
| SRK | SRK Consulting (Australasia) Pty Ltd |
| tonnes | |
| Te | tellurium |
| u | uranium |
| US$ | United States dollars |
| VALMIN | Australasian Code for the Public Reporting of Technical Assessments and Valuations of Mineral |
| Assets | |
| VTEM | versatile time domain electromagnetic |
| w | tungsten |
| wt% | weight per cent |
| XRD | X-ray difraction |
| ZTEM | Z-axis tipper electromagnetic |
SRK CONSULTING (AUSTRALASIA) PTY LTD ■ 27 MAY 2024 ■ SJ, CD, MD/JM
X
Independent Specialist Report on the Mineral Assets of Alice Queen Limited Executive Summary ■ Final
Executive Summary
SRK Consulting Australasia Pty Ltd (SRK) has been engaged by PKF Melbourne Corporate Pty Ltd (PKF) to prepare an independent specialist report (ISR, the Report) relating to the Mineral Assets held by Alice Queen Limited (Alice Queen) located in Queensland and New South Wales in Australia, as well as in the Fijian islands (Fiji).
This ISR has been prepared to assist in PKF in its determination of the fairness and reasonableness of an issue of new shares to Alice Queen's major shareholder, Gage Resource Development Pty Ltd. It is SRK's understanding that this ISR will be included in a Notice of Meeting informing Alice Queen's shareholders of the nature of the transaction being considered as part of a determination of fair value.
The SRK Report has been prepared in accordance with the guidelines outlined in the Australasian Code for the Public Reporting of Technical Assessment and Valuation of Mineral Assets (VALMIN Code, 2015), which incorporates the Australasian Code for the Reporting of Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves (JORC Code, 2012).
SRK's recommended valuation ranges and preferred values are detailed in Section 6 of this Report (Valuation) and are summarised in Table ES.1. The valuation represents the Market Value of the Mineral Assets as at the Valuation Date, this being 26 April 2024.
Based on its technical assessment and valuation, Table ES.1 summarises SRK's market value assessment of the defined Mineral Resources and exploration potential at each of the relevant projects in accordance with its mandate.
Valuation Summary
Based on its analysis, SRK considers the Market Value of the Mineral Assets of Alice Queen resides between A$11.1 million and A$22.5 million, with a preferred valuation of A$16.8 million (Table ES.1), which represents the mid-point of the adopted range.
SRK CONSULTING (AUSTRALASIA) PTY LTD ■ 27 MAY 2024 ■ SJ, CD, MD/JM
Independent Specialist Report on the Mineral Assets of Alice Queen Limited Executive Summary ■ Final
Table ES.1: Summary of the Market Value of the Mineral Assets of Alice Queen
| Table ES.1:Summary | of the Market Value of the Mineral Assets of Alice Queen |
|---|---|
| Project | Asset TypeSelected method or Low High combination (A$ M) (A$ M) Preferred (A$ M) |
| Horn Island (EPM25520) | Area Average 1.07 2.18 Resource Comparable transactions 8.17 16.34 Subtotal 9.24 18.52 1.63 12.26 13.88 |
| Kaiwalagal (EPM25418) | Area Average 0.19 0.37 Resource Subtotal 0.19 0.37 0.28 0.28 |
| Yarindur (EL8646) | Area Average 0.45 1.04 Resource Subtotal 0.45 1.04 0.75 0.75 |
| Mendooran (EL8469) | Area Average 0.16 0.35 Resource Subtotal 0.16 0.35 0.25 0.25 |
| Byrock (EL9568) | Area Comparable transactions 0.16 0.33 Resource Subtotal 0.16 0.33 0.25 0.25 |
| Gongolgon (EL9569) | Area Comparable transactions 0.14 0.29 Resource Subtotal 0.14 0.29 0.22 0.22 |
| Viani (SPL1513) | Area Average 0.03 0.05 Resource Subtotal 0.03 0.05 0.04 0.04 |
| Nabila (SPL 1514) | Area Average 0.70 1.49 Resource Subtotal 0.70 1.49 1.09 1.09 |
| Sabeto (SPL 1518) | Area Average 0.01 0.03 Resource Subtotal 0.01 0.03 0.02 0.02 |
| All | Area 2.9 6.1 Resource 8.2 16.3 4.5 12.3 |
| Total 11.1 22.5 16.8 |
Note: Any discrepancies between values in the tables are due to rounding.
In defining its valuation ranges, SRK notes that there are always inherent risks involved when deriving any arm's length valuation. These factors can ultimately result in significant differences in valuations over time. By applying narrower confidence ranges, a greater degree of certainty regarding these assets is being implied than may be the case. Where possible, SRK has endeavoured to narrow its valuation range.
SRK CONSUL TING (AUSTRALASIA) PTY LTD ■ 27 MAY 2024 ■ SJ, CD, MD/JM
2
Independent Specialist Report on the Mineral Assets of Alice Queen Limited Introduction • Final
1 Introduction
1.1 Terms of reference and purpose of the Report
SRK Consulting Australasia Pty Ltd (SRK) has been engaged by PKF Melbourne Corporate Pty Ltd (PKF) to prepare an independent specialist report (ISR, the Report) relating to the mineral assets held by Alice Queen Limited (Alice Queen) located in Queensland and New South Wales in Australia, as well as in the Fijian islands (Fiji).
This ISR has been prepared to assist in PKF in its determination of the fairness and reasonableness of an issue of new shares to Alice Queen's major shareholder, Gage Resource Development Pty Ltd. It is SRK's understanding that this ISR will be included in a Notice of Meeting informing Alice Queen's shareholders of the nature of the transaction being considered as part of a determination of fair value.
Figure 1.1: Location of Alice Queen's projects
==> picture [421 x 360] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [87 x 6] intentionally omitted <==
----- Start of picture text -----
Source: Alice Queen Limited
----- End of picture text -----
SRK CONSUL TING (AUSTRALASIA) PTY LTD • 27 MAY 2024 ■ SJ, CD, MD/JM
Independent Specialist Report on the Mineral Assets of Alice Queen Limited Introduction ■ Final
1.2 Scope of work
In accordance to SRK's mandate, this Report provides the following key technical information in relation to Alice Queen's current mineral tenures:
-
A detailed description of the projects, including the exploration/development status, details of recent exploration activities and any Mineral Resources defined, as well as any opportunities and risks associated with each of the projects.
-
An overview of the valuation methodologies and principal assumptions adopted by SRK in determining the value of Alice Queen's projects.
-
The valuation of any defined Mineral Resources and exploration potential associated with Alice Queen's Mineral Assets.
-
Details of any factors that may result in the Market Value of these Mineral Assets differing from the Technical Value, including the quantum of adjustment required, if any.
-
Valuation results cross-checked, where possible, against other relevant benchmarks.
-
Status of each tenement which is material to the ISR as prepared by SRK.
1.3 Site visit
SRK has not conducted site inspections to Alice Queen's tenures, with SRK's assessment limited to desktop analysis. In SRK's opinion, the projects are considered early-stage exploration to advanced stage projects. In SRK's opinion, a site inspection is unlikely to reveal additional information material to the development of this valuation.
1.4 Compliance
SRK has classified all of Alice Queen's mineral assets as Early stage to Advanced Exploration Projects in accordance with the categories outlined in the VALMIN Code (2015), namely:
-
Early-stage Exploration Projects - Tenure holdings where mineralisation may or may not have been identified, but where Mineral Resources have not been identified.
-
Advanced Exploration Projects - Tenure holdings where considerable exploration has been undertaken and specific targets have been identified that warrant further detailed evaluation, usually by drill testing, trenching or some other form of detailed geological sampling. A Mineral Resource estimate may or may not have been made, but sufficient work will have been undertaken on at least one prospect to provide both a good understanding of the type of mineralisation present and encouragement that further work will elevate one or more of the prospects to the Mineral Resources category.
-
Pre-development Projects - Tenure holdings where Mineral Resources have been identified and their extent estimated (possibly incompletely), but where a decision to proceed with development has not been made. Properties at the early assessment stage, properties for which a decision has been made not to proceed with development, properties on care and maintenance and properties held on retention titles are included in this category if Mineral Resources have been identified, even if no further work is being undertaken.
-
Development Projects - Tenure holdings for which a decision has been made to proceed with construction or production or both, but which are not yet commissioned or operating at design
SRK CONSULTING (AUSTRALASIA) PTY LTD ■ 27 MAY 2024 ■ SJ, CD, MD/JM
4
Independent Specialist Report on the Mineral Assets of Alice Queen Limited Introduction ■ Final
levels. The economic viability of Development Projects will be proven by at least a pre-feasibility study (PFS).
- Production Projects - Tenure holdings - particularly mines, wellfields and processing plants - that have been commissioned and are in production.
1.5 Reporting standard
The authors of this Report are Members or Fellows of either the Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy (AuslMM) and/or the Australian Institute of Geoscientists (AIG) and therefore are bound by both the VALMIN Code and the JORC Code.
For the avoidance of doubt, this Report has been prepared in accordance with:
-
the 2015 edition of the Australasian Code for Public Reporting of Technical Assessments and Valuations of Mineral Assets (VALMIN Code)
-
the 2012 edition of the Australasian Code for Reporting of Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves (JORC Code).
The peer reviewer of this Report, Mr Jeames McKibben, is a Registered Valuer and Chartered Valuation Surveyor with the Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors (RICS). As a result, this Report may be subject to monitoring by RICS under the Institution's Conduct and Disciplinary Regulations. Given SRK's mandate, this Report is not intended to comply with the RICS 2022 Valuation Standards, otherwise known as the 'Red Book'.
In accordance with the stated reporting guidelines, all geological and other relevant factors defining the disclosed Exploration Results have been considered in sufficient detail to serve as a guide for future exploration and development. Table 1 of the JORC Code has been used as a checklist during the preparation of this Report and any comments are provided on an 'if not, why not' basis to ensure clarity to an investor on whether aspects of the future development program have been considered as they apply to the JORC Code (2012) Table 1.
The JORC Code Table 1 criteria reflect the normal systematic approach to exploration target evaluation. Relevance and materiality are overriding principles that determine the information that needs to be publicly reported. This Report has attempted to provide sufficient comment on all matters that might materially affect a reader's understanding or interpretation of the results being reported. The criteria under which each project is being evaluated is consistent with the current understanding of the geological controls on the known mineralisation but, as more knowledge is gained, these criteria could change and be improved upon over time.
1.6 Work program
This assignment commenced in March 2024 and relies on data and information supplied by Alice Queen, as well as other publicly available data and other information as sourced by SRK from literature, as well as subscription databases such as S&P Capital IQ Pro database services.
SRK has satisfied itself and Alice Queen has warranted that all material information in its possession has been fully disclosed to SRK.
==> picture [6 x 83] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [5 x 63] intentionally omitted <==
SRK CONSULTING (AUSTRALASIA) PTY LTD ■ 27 MAY 2024 ■ SJ, CD, MD/JM
5
Independent Specialist Report on the Mineral Assets of Alice Queen Limited Introduction ■ Final
1. 7 Legal matters
SRK has not been engaged to comment on any legal matters. SRK notes that it is not qualified to make legal representations as to the ownership and legal standing of the mineral tenements that are the subject of this Report.
SRK has not attempted to confirm the legal status of the tenements with respect to joint venture (JV) agreements, local heritage or potential environmental or land access restrictions.
1.8 Effective Date
The Effective Date of this current Report is 26 April 2024, with the Valuation Date being the date of this Report.
1.9 Project team
This Report was prepared by a team of SRK's consultants and associates located in Australia. Details of the qualifications and experience of the consultants who have carried out the work in this Report, who have extensive experience in the mining industry and are members in good standing of appropriate professional institutions, are set out in Table 1. 1.
Table 1.1: Qualifications and experience of the project team
| Specialist | Stephen Johnson | Mathew Davies | Carl D'Silva | Jeames McKibben |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Position, | Senior Consultant | Senior Consultant | Principal Consultant | Principal Consultant |
| Company | (Geology), SRK | (Project Evaluation | (Petroleum), SRK | (Project Evaluation), |
| and Geology), SRK | SRK | |||
| Responsibility | Technical | Valuation | Data compilation, | Peer review |
| Assessment | review | |||
| Length and | +15 years - mining, | +15 years - mining, | +29 years - 19 | |
| type of | exploration geology, | exploration geology, | years in consulting | |
| experience | targeting, project | targeting, project | specialising in | |
| management roles | management roles | valuation and | ||
| with 1 O+ years in | corporate advisory; | |||
| valuation | 2 years as an | |||
| analyst; 8 years in | ||||
| exploration and | ||||
| project management | ||||
| roles | ||||
| Professional | BEng (Hons) | BSc (Hons) | BSc (Hons) Geology | MBA |
| designation | MAppFin | Exploration and | MAuslMM | BSc (Hons) |
| MAuslMM | Resource Geology | MAAPG | FAuslMM(CP) | |
| MAuslMM | MPESA | MAIG | ||
| MRICS |
SRK CONSULTING (AUSTRALASIA) PTY LTD ■ 27 MAY 2024 ■ SJ, CD, MD/JM
6
Independent Specialist Report on the Mineral Assets of Alice Queen Limited Introduction • Final
1.10 Limitation, reliance on information, declaration and consent
1.10.1 Limitations
The technical information presented herein relies on assumptions regarding certain forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements are estimates and involve a number of risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially.
Any projections as presented and discussed herein have been proposed by Alice Queen's management and cannot be assured; they are necessarily based on economic assumptions, many of which are beyond the control of Alice Queen. Unless otherwise stated, the opinions and conclusions expressed in this ISR are those of SRK.
1.10.2 Statement of SRK independence
Neither SRK, nor any of the authors of this Report, has any material present or contingent interest in the outcome of this Report, nor any pecuniary or other interest that could be reasonably regarded as capable of affecting their independence or that of SRK. SRK has no beneficial interest in the outcome of this Report capable of affecting its independence.
1.10.3 Indemnities
As recommended by the VALMIN Code (2015), Alice Queen will provide SRK with an indemnity under which SRK is to be compensated for any liability and/or any additional work or expenditure resulting from any additional work required:
-
that results from SRK's reliance on information provided by Alice Queen or Alice Queen not providing material information, or
-
that relates to any consequential extension workload through queries, questions or public hearings arising from this Report.
1.10.4 Competent Person and Practitioner consent
SRK consents to this Report being included, in full, in PKF's Independent Expert Report (IER) and referenced therein for inclusion in Alice Queen's Notice of Meeting. SRK provides this consent on the basis that the technical assessment expressed in the Executive Summary and in the individual sections of this Report is considered with, and not independently of, the information set out in the complete report. SRK does not consent to this ISR being used for any other purpose.
The information in this Report that relates to the technical assessment of the exploration potential associated with Alice Queen's Mineral Assets is based on and fairly reflects information compiled and conclusions derived by a team of consultants under the supervision and direction of Mr Jeames McKibben, who is a Fellow of the AuslMM and a Member of the AIG. Mr McKibben is a full-time employee of SRK, based in SRK's Brisbane office. Mr McKibben has sufficient experience that is relevant to the Mineral Assets under consideration, the style of mineralisation and the type of deposit under consideration and to the activity being undertaken to qualify as a Representative Practitioner as defined in the 2015 edition of the VALMIN Code. Mr McKibben consents to the inclusion in the Report of the matters based on the information in the form and context in which it appears.
SRK CONSUL TING (AUSTRALASIA) PTY LTD ■ 27 MAY 2024 • SJ, CD, MD/JM
7
Independent Specialist Report on the Mineral Assets of Alice Queen Limited Introduction • Final
1.10.5 Units of measure and currency
Throughout this Report, measurements are in metric units and currency is in United States dollars (US[$] ), Fi[j] ian dollars (F[$] ) or Australian dollars (A[$] ) unless otherwise stated.
1.11 Consulting fees
SRK will receive a fee of approximately A[$] 39,000 for the preparation of this ISR in accordance with normal professional consultin[g ] practices. This fee is not dependent on the findings of this ISR and SRK will receive no other benefit for the preparation of this ISR. Neither SRK nor any of the authors have any pecuniary or other interests that could reasonably be regarded as capable of affecting its ability to provide an unbiased opinion in relation to the mineral assets opined on by SRK and reported herein.
1.12 Structure of the Report
This Report adopts the following structure:
Part A: Australian Mineral Assets - Sections 2 to 3.
Part B: International Mineral Assets - Section 4.
Part C: Valuation - Sections 5 to 7.
SRK CONSULTING (AUSTRALASIA) PTY LTD ■ 27 MAY 2024 • SJ, CD, MD/JM
8
Independent Specialist Report on the Mineral Assets of Alice Queen Limited Part A: Australian Mineral Assets • Final
Part A: Australian Mineral Assets
SRK CONSUL TING (AUSTRALASIA) PTY LTD ■ 27 MAY 2024 ■ SJ, CD, MD/JM
Independent Specialist Report on the Mineral Assets of Alice Queen Limited Project Setting - Queensland ■ Final
2 Project Setting - Queensland
Alice Queen's Horn Island gold project lies in the Torres Strait region of Far North Queensland. Alice Queen holds an 84.5% interest in Kauraru Gold Pty Ltd and the Horn Island and Kaiwalagal projects (Table 2.1).
Table 2.1: Status of Alice Queen's mineral tenures in Queensland as at the Valuation Date
| Title | Project | Status | Grant date | Expiry | Area | Annual | Annual |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (region) | date | **(km2) ** | rent | expenditure | |||
| (blocks) | (A$) | commitment | |||||
| (A$) | |||||||
| EPM25520 | Horn Island, | Granted with | 08/10/2014 | 07/10/2024 | ~64 | Rental | Already |
| Queensland | Native Title | (1) | levies | exceeded | |||
| Protection | waived until | ||||||
| Conditions | 2028 | ||||||
| EPM25418 | Kaiwalagal, | Granted with | 25/01/2016 | 24/01/2026 | ~252 | Rental | Project based |
| Queensland | Native Title | (3) | levies | ||||
| Protection | waived until | ||||||
| Conditions | 2028 |
Sources: SRK
2.1 Location and infrastructure
The Horn Island and Kaiwalagal projects are located within the Kaurareg Archipelago, in the southwestern portion of the Torres Strait, approximately 20-25 km northwest of Cape York in Far North Queensland (Figure 2.1 ). The main tenure area (Horn Island) wa·s established over an area of approximately 64 km[2] , while the Kaiwalagal project (~252 km[2] ) encompasses several islands, including the largest island in the region, Prince of Wales, as well as other smaller islands nearby (e.g. Wednesday Island, Friday Island, Goods Island)
Thursday Island is the most populated island in the region with ~2,800 inhabitants, followed by the township of Wasaga, with ~580 inhabitants on the western part of Horn Island. Only a small number of families (~62 inhabitants) live on Prince of Wales Island, while most of the other islets are vacant Crown land, primarily used for local recreational purposes.
Local infrastructure in Horn Island includes roads, electricity network, service contractors, hospital, housing, and the historical mine site operations incorporating a water dam, waste dumps and ore stockpiles. The island can be accessed via a local airport which is serviced by Qantas Link, cargo and charter operators, as well as ferry services with connections to Thursday Island, Bamaga and beyond.
The other islands offer limited access.
Prince of Wales Island, however, has no well-established facilities for electricity, water, waste and sewerage management, and is thus reliant on power generators, water tanks, and daily waste collection by contractors.
SRK CONSULTING (AUSTRALASIA) PTY LTD ■ 27 MAY 2024 ■ SJ, CD, MD/JM
10
Independent Specialist Report on the Mineral Assets of Alice Queen Limited Project Setting - Queensland ■ Final
Figure 2.1: Location of Torres Strait tenements in Queensland
==> picture [415 x 417] intentionally omitted <==
----- Start of picture text -----
142 [°] 10' 142 [°] 15' 142 [°] 20'
Wedne,day /1. (,
N
A
t I It I It It It
....... ...
. .. . . . . . . .
. • • -; EPM ..... ·25520 ' ,.
0, • ••• •. 1,-i,le,w • • ,. • · •I• ·
.. . : :;: : : : : : : : : �� �•j
• t I• t • t • t I I .............'f : : : '. : : : : ..... . .....
............. . ............ ..... .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . .. . . . . \'
CS, ., I I I It It I I I I I I I It t It I It It I I I I I I I I I I I It t t t It t t t I I It I I I I I• I IIt t I It I I I I It It. t I It t It t ,._ __
: : : : : : : : : : : : : r�!��f �� �i:::::::::::::: ·:
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • ·(M11f#Altl�"��s: &�:� • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
t t t t t t t It It t It It t I It t t t It I It It t t I I It t t t I I I I I It t t t t t t t t t t I It I It t t t t t t : : : ; : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : . [E][PM] t . [2] t t It It It• t t It It I I I 5;4� 8 : : : : : ; ; : : ; : : : : : : : : . I I I I I Ch1ropo h G-001 Woody Is (ICo-Y,
.............................................. --.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ......
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . rt
.... . ... . .. .. ...
"'.,
0 2.5 kmDayma, /s/a ';'
- --
nimaral,g Ii/and
142 [°] 15' 142 [°] 20'
----- End of picture text -----
Source: SRK, 2024
2.1.1 Physiography and climate
Horn Island features a landscape defined by coastal plains and a low-lying terrain, while Prince of Wales Island is characterised by hills reaching up to ~230 m. Despite its mostly flat topography, Horn Island displays diverse vegetation, primarily composed of tropical savanna combined with patches of mangroves along the coastline. Prince of Wales Island is rugged and wooded.
The Torres Strait region experiences a consistently warm (15-25[°] C) tropical climate throughout the year, with the wet season extending from December to April characterised by high humidity and frequent heavy rainfall. The island is occasionally affected by tropical cyclones, but its proximity to the Equator mitigates their significant threat.
SRK CONSULTING (AUSTRALASIA) PTY LTD ■ 27 MAY 2024 ■ SJ, CD, MD/JM
11
Independent Specialist Report on the Mineral Assets of Alice Queen Limited Project Setting - Queensland • Final
2.2 Regional geology
The Torres Strait region sits within the partially submerged Badu-Weymouth Belt, formerly Cape York-Oromio Ridge, which extends from the Mount Carter-Cape Weymouth area in the eastern Cape York Peninsula to Badu Island in southern Torres Strait, and into Papua New Guinea (Withnall and Cranfield, 2013). During the Early Carboniferous, several active eruption centres originated as an expressive volume of acid volcanism, forming the Torres Strait Volcanics, which consist mainly of tuffs with minor agglomerate, rhyolite, andesite and interbedded sediments (Willmott and Powell, 1977). The southern part of Torres Strait encompasses four distinct volcanic members composed of interconnected tuff sheets: the Eborac, Endeavour Strait (350 Ma, Cross et al., 2019), Goods Island and Mura lug ignimbrites, which may have originated from different sources (e.g. Kositcin et al., 2016; Cross et al., 2019).
In the same region, Early Carboniferous to Mid Permian Kennedy Igneous Province is mostly composed of intrusive felsic magmatism, often associated with a large variety of mineral systems in northern Queensland (e.g. Sn-W, intrusion-related Au (± Mo, Bi, W), epithermal Au ± Ag, intrusion related U-F-Mo and possibly porphyry Cu-Au as outlined in Kositcin et al., 2009; Champion and Bultitude, 2013).
Magmatic rocks of the Badu Supersuite on Horn Island have recently been attributed to the Torres Strait Subprovince, including the Badu (343 Ma) and Horn Island granites (345 Ma), porphyritic dykes and the Torres Strait Volcanic Group (von Gnielinski et al., 1997; Cross et al., 2019).
The Badu Granite constitutes the majority of Badu Island and also occurs in the eastern side of Horn Island (Willmott et al., 1973; Gnielinski et al., 1997), where it is frequently cut by acid and intermediate dykes and lies in contact with the more expressive Horn Island granite. Small occurrences of the Horn Island Granite are also found in the northeast of Prince of Wales Island.
Lowland areas on all islands are usually covered by Tertiary residual sands, while coastal alluvium underlies swamps along the coastlines.
SRK CONSUL TING (AUSTRALASIA) PTY LTD • 27 MAY 2024 ■ SJ, CD, MD/JM
12
Independent Specialist Report on the Mineral Assets of Alice Queen Limited Project Setting - Queensland ■ Final
Figure 2.2: Regional geology of Torres Strait region showing extension of Kennedy Igneous Province
==> picture [315 x 413] intentionally omitted <==
----- Start of picture text -----
Kennedy Igneous Association
- 265-260Ma
- 325-290Ma
- 359-330Ma
- Undifferentiated Permo-Carb
Structural Framework
Late Permlan - Cenozolc Basins
Devonian • Carboniferous Basins
New England Orogen
Mossman Orogen
I\
t1 Thomson Orogen
North Australian Craton
oe (i..
' .
I
I
n
, [s][:]
-
-.'I .. •
- 1¾, : •
�u . [) ]
,-.� AU.
: •• ;! ,-�.fl l. J
.f [' ][Charters Towers ]
0 I 1 1 1 I It I I 35 70 , 140 Kilometres • �u
----- End of picture text -----
Source: Geological Survey of Queensland, 2019
2.3 Local geology
The tenements of the Horn Island and Kaiwalagal projects encompass rocks of Torres Strait Volcanics (Figure 2.3), including rhyolitic welded tuff, ignimbrite and agglomerate, volcanic breccia and minor sediments that have been intruded by the Badu Granite and a later post-mineralisation intermediate dyke suite of undetermined age in Horn Island (Willmott et al., 1973).
The historical Horn Island gold deposit occurs within a composite granitic stock dominated by coarsely porphyritic leucocratic granite, intruded by medium-grained hornblende-biotite granodiorite, followed by felsic aplite phases (Burlet, 2015). Similarly_, the Badu granitic units vary from medium-grained porphyritic to equigranular granite, and aplite (e.g. Willmott and Powell, 1977; Mackenzie and Wellman, 1997).
SRK CONSULTING (AUSTRALASIA) PTY LTD ■ 27 MAY 2024 ■ SJ, CD, MD/JM
13
Independent Specialist Report on the Mineral Assets of Alice Queen Limited Project Setting - Queensland ■ Final
Figure 2.3: Geology and mineral occurrences in Horn Island region
==> picture [315 x 410] intentionally omitted <==
----- Start of picture text -----
143 [° ]
0 Significant Au camp
o Minor Au camp
-10' • Minor Sn camp
Regional Geology
Mesozoic-Cenozoic Cover
.. Permo-Carb Extruslves
Permo-Carb lntruslves
-
d Horn Island
<r�
c�
Possession Island
◊
Punsand Bay
I I
0 10 20 km
Source: Geological Survey of Queensland, 2019
. 0 , · . �
c; •
----- End of picture text -----
The Horn Island mineralisation is interpreted to form part of an intrusion-related system, with gold and silver lodes associated with pyrite, galena, sphalerite, with lesser arsenopyrite and chalcopyrite and accessory molybdenite and tetrahedrite restricted to thin and irregular quartz-sulphide carbonate veins, breccias and stockworks related to the granites. Sericite is the dominant alteration type associated with gold mineralisation, especially in wider lodes. Zones with intense stockwork and sheeted veins development generally have higher grades, and visible gold has been observed in drill cores (Alice Queen Limited, ASX announcement, 11 November 2021 ). The vein-hosted mineralisation was em placed in stages along tensional structures following a northwest trending regional shear formed during the emplacement of the Badu Granite (Burlet, 2015).
A mesothermal origin was previously interpreted for the mineralisation (Levy and Storey, 1990) and metal pathfinder with magmatic fractionation trends, together with surface occurrences of gold in alluvial material, indicate a potentially larger and deeper gold system which has been the focus of subsequent exploration efforts.
SRK CONSULTING (AUSTRALASIA) PTY LTD ■ 27 MAY 2024 ■ SJ, CD, MD/JM
14
Independent Specialist Report on the Mineral Assets of Alice Queen Limited Project Setting - Queensland • Final
2.4 Previous exploration
Historical registers of gold occurrences in Horn Island by 1800s and sporadic mining activity until studies, scoping, mining planning and operations as described in Table 2.2. 1940, were precursors of continuous exploration activities including the development of feasibility.
Table 2.2: Summary of previous exploration - Horn Island tenement area
| Period | Tenement | Company/explorer | Commodities | Main activities |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| number | and/or style | |||
| of | ||||
| mineralisation | ||||
| 1958 | Enterprise | Gold | Reconnaissance investigation of goldfields | |
| Exploration | on Horn Island and Possession Island and | |||
| Company Pty Ltd | copper occurrences on other Torres Strait | |||
| islands. | ||||
| 1950s- | GML33 | C.E. Peverill | Gold | Bulk sampling. |
| 1960s | ||||
| 1962 | AtP184M | New Consolidated | Gold | Horn Island goldfield visited. |
| Gold Fields | ||||
| (Australasia) Pty | ||||
| Ltd | ||||
| 1963 | GML33 | Australian | Gold | Detailed study of Horn Island goldfield, |
| Selection Pty Ltd | three diamond drill holes with gold | |||
| occurred in the main quartz-sulphide reefs | ||||
| and veins. | ||||
| 1966 | AtP314M | CRA Exploration | Copper | Drainage sampling (121 samples) over 10 |
| Pty Ltd | Torres Strait islands, including Horn, | |||
| targeting porphyry copper. No | ||||
| characteristics of copper porphyry granites | ||||
| found. | ||||
| 1969-1970 | AtP580M | Noranda Australia | Gold, silver, | Geological mapping, rock chip (300) and |
| Ltd | base metals | soil (10) samples sampling. Extensive | ||
| areas of alteration outlined with pyrite and | ||||
| gold. High background silver and lead | ||||
| results with low copper and zinc indicated. | ||||
| Follow-up sampling indicated erratic | ||||
| analysis. | ||||
| 1979 | AtP2222M | Jimbilly Pty | Gold | Geological mapping and geochemical |
| Ltd/Apollo | sampling with several high gold values at | |||
| International | Narupai and Eureka workings. Gold | |||
| Minerals NL | associated with sulphides and quartz over | |||
| a 300 m+ strike length at Welcome, | ||||
| controlled by faulting within and adjacent | ||||
| to the microgranite. |
15
SRK CONSUL TING (AUSTRALASIA) PTY LTD • 27 MAY 2024 • SJ, CD, MD/JM
Independent Specialist Report on the Mineral Assets of Alice Queen Limited Project Setting - Queensland • Final
| Period | Tenement | Company/explorer | Commodities | Main activities |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| number | and/or style | |||
| of | ||||
| mineralisation | ||||
| 1983-1987 | AtP3352M | Jimbilly Pty | Intrusion- | Geological reconnaissance of alteration |
| Ltd/Seltrust Mining | related gold | zones, with rock chip sampling showing | ||
| Corporation Pty Ltd | significant values. Ground magnetic and | |||
| IP surveys. Soil sampling with gold | ||||
| anomaly in the southern Silicified Ridge. | ||||
| Diamond and percussion drilling with gold | ||||
| associated with quartz sulphide veining. Preliminar assessment of reserves and |
||||
| resources. Deeper diamond drilling to test verical extension of mineralisation. |
||||
| Potential alluvial/eluvial resource | ||||
| identified. Preliminary engineering study, | ||||
| metallurgical testing and feasibility study | ||||
| completed. Sterilisation and groundwater | ||||
| drilling conducted. | ||||
| AIP4273M | Carpentaria | Stream sediment with gold anomaly, | ||
| Exploration | airborne geophysical survey with magnetic | |||
| Company Ply Ltd | (northwest trend) lode structure identified | |||
| as source. | ||||
| 1985-1989 | AIP3352M, | Torres Strait Gold | Intrusion- | Stream sediment geochemistry. IP |
| AIP4273M & | Ply Ltd Uoint | related gold | surveys across mine area, Southern | |
| AIP4609M | venture between | Silicified Ridge and Cable Bay Ridge to | ||
| AuGold NL and | assist targeting drill follow-up. Anomalies | |||
| Giant Resources | drill tested, with significant results. Mine | |||
| Limited) | production was ~25,000 oz grading at an | |||
| average of 1.58 g/1 Au until 1989. |
Source: SRK compilation of historical reports
2.5 Exploration activities
After the historical exploration and mining phase was paused in 1989, the area was not explored for several years. In 2015, Alice Queen negotiated with the Queensland government to resume exploration activities and the permit was granted under Native Title Protection Conditions. The permit allowed exploration for all minerals other than coal. The main exploration activities conducted by Alice Queen are summarised in Table 2.3.
Table 2.3: Alice Queen's exploration activities by tenement - Queensland
| Period | Project (tenement) |
Activities completed |
|---|---|---|
| 2015-2017 | Horn Island | Review of all historical work completed on Horn Island, establishment of |
| (EPM25520) | extensive database, especially for drilling. Assays for 80 of 536 holes | |
| (8,077 m) located. Integration of assay data, previous work and surface | ||
| geology observation defined mineralisation trends in the old pit area. | ||
| Potential areas identified outside of the mine pit zone (e.g. Southern | ||
| Silicified Ridge). | ||
| 2017-2018 | Horn Island | Mineral Resource estimate, including an update in the Inferred Mineral |
| (EPM25520) | Resources category. | |
| 2018-present | Horn Island | Geological investigation, drilling, new Mineral Resource estimate and |
| (EPM25520) | scoping study in 2021. | |
| 2018-present | Kaiwalagal | Airborne magnetic and radiometric geophysical surveying. |
| (EPM25418) |
Source: SRK
SRK CONSUL TING (AUSTRALASIA) PTY LTD ■ 27 MAY 2024 ■ SJ, CD, MD/JM
16
Independent Specialist Report on the Mineral Assets of Alice Queen Limited Project Setting - Queensland ■ Final
2.6 Mineral Resources
Alice Queen's first Mineral Resource estimate prepared under the guidelines of the JORC Code (2012) for the Horn Island deposit was prepared in 2018. It comprised an Inferred Mineral Resource of 7.9 Mt at 1.9 git Au for 492,000 oz (Alice Queen Limited, ASX announcement, 2 August 2018).
In 2021, Alice Queen reported an update of the Mineral Resource estimate and scoping study assessment of the economic aspects of a potential open pit mining operation targeting the estimated gold resources (Alice Queen Limited, ASX announcement, 30 June 2021 ). This updated Mineral Resource comprised 16.7 Mt at 0.98 git Au for 524,000 oz, using a 0.4 git Au cut-off grade, which encompassed an area adjacent to the abandoned Horn Island open pit (closed in 1989). Of the total defined Mineral Resource, 65% of the deposit or 8.9 Mt at 0.97 git Au for 277,000 oz of contained gold was categorised as Measured and Indicated Mineral Resources (Figure 2.4, Figure 2.5 and Figure 2.6). The scoping study estimated a mine life of 8.5 years at an average production rate of 37 koz per annum, with maximum gold recovery of 91 %.
Figure 2.4: Mineral Resource estimate (JORC Code 2012) for the Horn Island deposit and comparison with previous estimates
Mineral Resource estimate >0.6 g/t Au cut-off
| Tonnage mt | Grade Augpt | AukOz | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Indicated Resource | 5.8 | 1.22 | 227 |
| Inferred Resource | 4.8 | 1.29 | 200 |
| total | 10.6 | 1.26 | 427 |
Mineral Resource Statement >0.4g/t Au cut-off
| Tonnage mt | Grade Augpt | AukOz | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Indicated Resource | 8.9 | 0.97 | 277 |
| Inferred Resource | 7.8 | 0,99 | 247 |
| total | 16.7 | 0,98 | 524 |
Comparison with prior estimate
| Cut-off (g/t Au) / %Classification |
Tonnage mt | GradeAu gpt | Au kOz | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2018 Resource Statement |
0.5 / 100% Inferred | 7.9 | 1.9 | 492 |
| 2021 Resource Statement |
0.4 / 53% Indicated, 47% Inferred |
16.7 | 0.98 | 524 |
| Difference | +8.8 | -0.92 | +32 |
Source: Alice Queen Limited, ASX announcement, 2 August 2018
SRK CONSULTING (AUSTRALASIA) PTY LTD ■ 27 MAY 2024 ■ SJ, CD, MD/JM
17
Independent Specialist Report on the Mineral Assets of Alice Queen Limited Project Setting - Queensland ■ Final
Figure 2.5: Location of historical pit and 2021 Mineral Resource estimate area - Horn Island project
==> picture [422 x 382] intentionally omitted <==
----- Start of picture text -----
HORN
ISLAND
(NGURUPAI)
AQX Resource
Historic Mine Stockpiles
Alluvial Gold Targets
.. Surface Infrastructure
Source: Alice Queen Limited, 2021
----- End of picture text -----
SRK CONSULTING (AUSTRALASIA) PTY LTD ■ 27 MAY 2024 ■ SJ, CD, MD/JM
18
Independent Specialist Report on the Mineral Assets of Alice Queen Limited Project Setting - Queensland ■ Final
Figure 2.6: Leapfrog 3D cross section of the Mineral Resource estimate - Horn Island project
==> picture [420 x 556] intentionally omitted <==
----- Start of picture text -----
VN
SHEAR ZONE- controlingstructureformlnerallsation
RHY RHYOLITE - AND ANDESITE
EQG EQUIGRANULAR GRANITE
QFGP QUARTZ FELDSPAR GRANITE PORPHYRY
MFGP MEGACRYSTIC GRANITE PORPHYRY
----- End of picture text -----
Source: Alice Queen Limited, 2021
SRK CONSUL TING (AUSTRALASIA) PTY LTD ■ 27 MAY 2024 ■ SJ, CD, MD/JM
19
Independent Specialist Report on the Mineral Assets of Alice Queen Limited Project Setting - Queensland ■ Final
2. 7 Exploration targets and prospectivity
2.7.1 Horn Island project (EPM2552)
Within the Horn Island project, a number of targets remain to be adequately assessed. These are discussed in further detail below.:
Southern Silicified Ridge prospect: The Southern Silicified Ridge (Figure 2.7) target occurs ~approximately 2.5 km southwest of the existing resource at Horn Island. The target is defined by various geophysical signatures, including a chargeability high, airborne magnetics and hyperspectral anomalies. Rock Previous rock chip geochemical sampling and drilling of 14 drill holes (Alice Queen Limited, ASX announcement, 22 June 2022) has confirmed the presence of anomalous gold results over >5 km of strike (Alice Queen Limited, ASX announcement, 22 June 2022) (Figure 2.7). Copper mineralisation was also intercepted at depth in the Jedha 1 anomaly (Figure 2.7), returning a maximum intercept of 1 m averaging 3.0% Cu at a downhole depth of 173 m in hole 22NGD108 (Figure 2.7) (Alice Queen Limited, ASX announcement, 16 May 2022; and ASX announcement, 12 January 2023). This copper-rich vein represents a potential copper target within the project area.
SRK CONSULTING (AUSTRALASIA) PTY LTD ■ 27 MAY 2024 ■ SJ, CD, MD/JM
20
Independent Specialist Report on the Mineral Assets of Alice Queen Limited Project Setting - Queensland ■ Final
Figure 2.7: DDIP survey and location of Southern Silicified Ridge prospect and Jedha 1 anomaly
==> picture [383 x 571] intentionally omitted <==
----- Start of picture text -----
e to Naboo Pro
verlng a NW tre
anomalous gold
AQX Resource Outline
JV DDIP Survey Ana
DDIP Readings • Completed
JV Soll Sampling Area
Rock Chip Samples (git Au)
■ >1.00g/lAu
■ 0.51-1.00g/lAu
■ o.11-o.sogltAu
0.03 ° 0.I0g/lAu
8826ooomN
Sm CP O.Sg/l Au fr •6m 17NG00S0
1nd lm@> l.Og/tAu fr 117m
18NGD056
Um O 1.0a/1 Au fr 31m
Ind. [email protected],ltAufr3lm
and Jm l!> 0,81/tAu fr UMm
Ind, lm fil 1,41/t Au fr 106m
and lm@ l,81/t Au fr 121m
and lm CP 1.1,11 Au r, 191m
1BNGOOS7
nm 8 0.5&/t Au fr44m
Ind, Jm@ 2.61/t Au fr 54m
and 7m@ 0,51/t Au fr 70m
Intl. lm@ 1,la/l Au fr nm
and 2m@ 5,61/t Au fr 160m
and lm@ 1,21/t Au fr 161m
8824ooomN
1 KIiometre
- Projection: UOUont 5' (GDA941 - - /'• Current Drill Holes
,,,.,-0 Previous Drill Holes
640ooomE 642ooomE
----- End of picture text -----
Source: Alice Queen Limited, ASX announcements: 12 May 2022; 12 January, 2023
SRK CONSUL TING (AUSTRALASIA) PTY LTD ■ 27 MAY 2024 ■ SJ, CD, MD/JM
21
Independent Specialist Report on the Mineral Assets of Alice Queen Limited Project Setting - Queensland • Final
Figure 2.8: Mineralisation in veins of altered granite porphyry chalcopyrite, arsenopyrite, pyrite and galena in drill hole 22NGD108
==> picture [368 x 215] intentionally omitted <==
Source: Alice Queen Limited, ASX announcement, 16 May 2022
Figure 2.9: Tatooine prospect area near the Horn Island deposit, with relevant drill hole gold assay results
==> picture [364 x 323] intentionally omitted <==
----- Start of picture text -----
DDIP_CHGAre11
0 DrillHolu Cony,/eled
----- End of picture text -----
Source: Alice Queen Limited, ASX announcement, 30 June 2021
SRK CONSULTING (AUSTRALASIA) PTY LTD • 27 MAY 2024 • SJ, CD, MD/JM
22
Independent Specialist Report on the Mineral Assets of Alice Queen Limited Project Setting - Queensland ■ Final
Figure 2.1 O: Alluvial gold target areas in Horn Island
==> picture [421 x 248] intentionally omitted <==
----- Start of picture text -----
• • ,t-t)I
• tl-1 tm
. . , ..
1:28,000
----- End of picture text -----
Source: Alice Queen Limited, 2022
Legacy stockpiles: Several legacy stockpiles (Figure 2.11 ), including West Bund (48,875 m[3] ), ROM Area (1,011,392 m [3] ), North Bund (94,953 m [3] ), Low Grade Stockpile (499,790 m [3] ) and Waste Dump (2,505,900 m[3] ) near the Horn Island historical mine contain previously mined material with an estimated total volume >4 Mm [3] . Alice Queen's drilling in 2022 (51 holes for 1,038 m) tested the profiles of these legacy stockpiles (Alice Queen Limited, ASX announcement , 14 January 2022). The assay results show positive gold anomalies , with intercepts of >0.4 g/t Au .
The best intercepts recovered were:
-
4 mat 0.5 g/t Au from 3 m (21NGRC102)
-
2 mat 0.5 g/t Au from 6 m (21NGRC104)
-
1 m at 0.6 g/t Au from 15 m (21NGRC121)
-
3 mat 0.8 g/t Au from 6 m, including 1 m at 1.7 g/t Au from 6 m (21NGRC131)
-
2 mat 0.4 g/t Au from 9 m (21 NGRC114).
23
SRK CONSULTING (AUSTRALASIA) PTY LTD ■ 27 MAY 2024 ■ SJ, CD, MO/JM
Independent Specialist Report on the Mineral Assets of Alice Queen Limited Project Setting - Queensland ■ Final
Figure 2.11: Horn Island stockpiles and drill holes tested near the historical gold mine
==> picture [420 x 285] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [420 x 112] intentionally omitted <==
----- Start of picture text -----
Low Grade Stockpile
- Vol. 499,790m'
AQX Resource Outline
Legacy Mine Stockpiles
Completed Grade Control
Drill Holes
• Completed Legacy
Stockpile Drlllholes
----- End of picture text -----
Source: Alice Queen Limited, date
2.7.2 Kaiwalagal project (EPM25418)
Airborne magnetic and radiometric geophysical surveys (Figure 2.12) covering the Prince of Wales Island and adjacent islands within the Kaiwalagal project highlighted multiple intrusion-related gold and epithermal gold targets. These targets were interpreted as large-scale, multi-phase granite batholiths and a younger, overlying caldera structure (Alice Queen Limited, ASX announcement, 27 July 2021 ). Alice Queen reported several magnetic geophysical anomalies and a 218 km [2 ] hydrothermal alteration zoning, including argillic and sericite-carbonate alteration zones, was interpreted from hyperspectral VNIR/SWIR (visible near infrared/short wave infrared) image multi mineral analysis. These anomalies represent conceptual to early-stage targets and represent a high priority zone or warrant additional near-term exploration within the tenement area.
SRK CONSULTING (AUSTRALASIA) PTY LTD ■ 27 MAY 2024 ■ SJ, CD, MD/JM
24
Independent Specialist Report on the Mineral Assets of Alice Queen Limited Project Setting - Queensland ■ Final
Figure 2.12: Magnetic geophysical anomalies interpreted as targets within the Kaiwalagal project tenements
==> picture [421 x 287] intentionally omitted <==
----- Start of picture text -----
D Allct Out n T1nemtnt1
0 T11gt l
AQK Ruouru OuUlno
C) B11holllh
(__) [M19nollc Oom1ln1 ]
----- End of picture text -----
Source: Alice Queen Limited, ASX announcement, 27 July 2021
2.8 SRK's opinion
The Horn Island project is best evaluated as an advanced exploration project with an existing Mineral Resource and several well-defined targets supported by the existing exploration data. These targets provide potential for extensions to the existing mineralised zones and additional discoveries throughout the broader tenement package, particularly those at the Southern Silicified Ridge and the Kaiwalagal project.
As demonstrated by the 2021 scoping study, the Horn Island project offers a potential development option with further upside following additional exploration in the area. Additional exploration drill testing targeting the down dip extension to the currently defined Mineral Resources has the potential to add incrementally to the current defined resource base and improve the economics of the project.
SRK notes historical sampling and assay data over portions of the now-flooded open pit are of lower quality than current industry standards. To mitigate the risk associated with these areas, defined Mineral Resources in these areas have been downgraded to Inferred status.
SRK notes that these flooded portions of the pit are significantly under-sampled.
SRK notes the Mineral Resource used data derived from an average drill spacing of 50 m x 50 m.
SRK CONSULTING (AUSTRALASIA) PTY LTD ■ 27 MAY 2024 ■ SJ, CD, MD/JM
25
Independent Specialist Report on the Mineral Assets of Alice Queen Limited Project Setting - New South Wales • Final
3 Project Setting - New South Wales
Alice Queen's four gold projects in New South Wales, in which Alice Queen holds a 90.0% interest (EL8469 and EL8646) and 100.0% interest in EL9568 and EL9569, are located in the prospective Lachlan Orogen (Table 3.1 ). The projects historically lack concerted exploration due to the presence of widespread sedimentary cover which masks the underlying bedrock geology. Alice Queen has carried out extensive geophysical programs and interpretation for exploration targeting to support ongoing exploration efforts over its tenure portfolio.
Table 3.1: Status of Alice Queen's mineral tenures in New South Wales as at the Valuation Date
| Title | Project (region) | Status | Grant date | Expiry date | Area | Annual | Annual expenditure |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| **(km2) ** | rent | commitment | |||||
| (blocks) | (A$) | (A$) | |||||
| EL8469 | Lachlan Orogen, | Active | 30/09/2016 | 30/09/2026 | 291 | 5,260 | Already exceeded |
| New South Wales | (10) | ||||||
| EL8646 | Lachlan Orogen, | Active | 12/09/2017 | 12/09/2025 | 249 | 6,100 | Already exceeded |
| New South Wales | (10) | ||||||
| EL9568 | Lachlan Orogen, | Active | 19/05/2023 | 19/05/2025 | 1632 | 33,220 | 300,000 |
| New South Wales | (34) | ||||||
| EL9569 | Lachlan Orogen, | Active | 23/05/2023 | 23/05/2025 | 1440 | 29,260 | 250,000 |
| New South Wales | (28) |
Source: SRK
3.1 Location and infrastructure
The Mendooran (EL8469), Yarindury (EL8646), Byrock (EL9568), and Gongolgon (EL9569) projects are situated in the central west region of New South Wales. The tenements are situated approximately 560 km northwest of Sydney, within the Orana region (Figure 3.1). The Mendooran (EL8469) and Yarindury (EL8646) projects lie adjacent to each other, with access available via the Golden Highway from Dubbo. The Byrock (EL9568) and Gongolgon (EL9569) projects are located approximately 80 km southeast of Bourke.
The Orana region is equipped with infrastructure that supports mining activities, including the Main Western Railway Line for mineral transport and a network of highways for machinery and personnel movement. The Dubbo City Regional Airport provides a good transport service and enables project personnel travel to and from the various sites. Reliable utilities and telecommunications are available to meet the operational needs of the mining industry.
SRK CONSULTING (AUSTRALASIA) PTY LTD ■ 27 MAY 2024 • SJ, CD, MD/JM
26
Independent Specialist Report on the Mineral Assets of Alice Queen Limited Project Setting - New South Wales • Final
Figure 3.1: Location of Alice Queen's tenements in New South Wales
==> picture [420 x 411] intentionally omitted <==
----- Start of picture text -----
163000 0 1635000 164000 0 16450000 165000 16550000 16600 1665000
§
I �
l Co/8/'
,� � . . ·� AUSTRALIA 8 0
-:f'� Gongolgon / • SY,dne
,.. ·, ��rewarrpfoject I 0
aarw�" Ri��! 7 Esn, TomT�11>8,1/-1'8!A. 7
\ USGS
ll 'he,; RN er I "1
o
/
I i
I / :l)
\ [Coonamble ]
i'
I
1
I 1182 [)]
\
�,&
Mendooran
/
/ ' Project (EL8469) [1 ]
513m f' Yal'indury
Project
( . (EL8646)
NEW
18m WALES SOUTH � f. Es;I, Tomlom, Garm� AO, NOM, USGS, Esrl,/' '_ )fo-,. [Oubbo ] [1] CGfAR
163000 0 163 000 164000 164 00 165000 165 0000 16600 00 16650000
Source: SRK
,
� (F;L9s(i9)
----- End of picture text -----
3.1.1 Physiography and climate
The Byrock and Gongolgon areas are characterised by a flat, semi-arid landscape along the Darling River in the Murray-Darling Basin, while the Mendooran and Yarindury areas comprise a combination of flat plains and hills, intersected by the Macquarie River.
The region experiences a warm to hot semi-arid climate, including summers with temperatures often exceeding 35[°] C and mild to cool winters, with average temperatures near 17[°] C. Dubbo receives higher rainfall than Bourke, with an annual average of about 575 mm, and the rainfall is more evenly distributed throughout the year.
The Byrock and Gongolgon areas host vegetation adapted to an arid environment, including a variety of shrubs, grasses and trees. The vegetation in the Yarindury and Mendooran tenements is more diverse due to the higher rainfall, and includes grasslands, woodlands, and riverine
SRK CONSULTING (AUSTRALASIA) PTY LTD ■ 27 MAY 2024 ■ SJ, CD, MD/JM
27
Independent Specialist Report on the Mineral Assets of Alice Queen Limited Project Setting - New South Wales • Final
ecosystems. The central area of the Mendooran project extends to the eastern boundary of the Goonoo State Forest (CCA Zone 3 State Conservation Area).
3.2 Regional geology
The Lachlan Orogen of eastern Australia forms part of a Palaeozoic convergent plate margin that stretched around the supercontinent of Gondwana from South America to Australia (Foster and Gray, 2000). The orogen experienced multiple phases of felsic to mafic volcanism, with minor ultramafic intrusions, and is characterised by an assemblage of Lower Palaeozoic (545-365 Ma) deepwater turbidites rich in quartz, along with calc-alkaline volcanic rocks and granitic plutons (Raymond, 2018). The occurrence of underlying mafic units suggests an oceanic origin. Multiple stages of deformation and metamorphism starting in the Late Ordovician (~450 Ma) led to the contraction and amalgamation of the Lachlan Orogen, which evolved from an oceanic turbidite fan system into continental crustal until the early Carboniferous (~380 Ma) (Foster and Gray, 2000).
The structural corridor formed at the Lachlan Transverse Zone (Figure 3.2) played a crucial role in the emplacement of porphyry intrusive bodies with monzodioritic-dioritic to monzonite-granodiorite compositions into the volcaniclastic and volcanic sequences. The northwestern tenements are mainly covered by the Cenozoic Sedimentary Province consisting of mixed colluvial, alluvial and aeolian deposits, while Quaternary residual deposits and sandstones-siltstone sequences from the Great Australian Basin predominate in the southeastern tenements (Department of Regional New South Wales, 2008).
The Lachlan Orogen is also marked by a long history of mineral production, with gold and copper deposits mainly hosted in porphyries in the Macquarie Arc.
SRK CONSULTING (AUSTRALASIA) PTY LTD • 27 MAY 2024 • SJ, CD, MD/JM
28
Independent Specialist Report on the Mineral Assets of Alice Queen Limited Project Setting - New South Wales • Final
Figure 3.2: Macquarie Arc in the Eastern Lachlan Orogen and the Lachlan Transverse Zone location
==> picture [410 x 322] intentionally omitted <==
----- Start of picture text -----
151•oo·e 148<E * porphyry
o skarn
New South Wales e.. eplthermal o mosothormal
100km
Narromlne
Northparka■
.)
33•oo·s (
L rl - Lach Ian Tmnsverae Zone
35•oo·s
• Ouoonboyon
REFERENCE
Macquarie Arc oulcrop end Inferred subcfop � Porphyry deposits
0 50 100km
----- End of picture text -----
Sources: Lickfold et al., 2003; Glen et al., 2007.
3.3 Local geology
The underlying geology of the Mendooran (EL8469) and Yarindury (EL8646) areas is interpreted to form part of the Molong Volcanic Belt, an extension of the Lachlan Orogen to the east, including the Ordovician-Silurian Macquarie Arc (Figure 3.2). The arc is known for the Early Ordovician to Early Silurian (481-437 Ma) porphyries with shoshonitic composition, which are mineralisation hosts for several known copper-gold deposits in the surrounding area (Glen et al., 2007).
Previous drilling programs in Yarindury (EL8646) identified cobble conglomerates, intermediate intrusions (porphyritic andesite) and basement rocks, including coarse-grained diorite, monzodiorite and gabbro intruded by thin syenite dykes. Chlorite-haematite alteration is frequently observed in the core samples and the surface geology encompasses alluvial sediments, siltstones and sandstones (Alice Queen Limited, ASX announcement, 12 September 2020).
The basement geology to the Byrock (EL9568) and Gongolgon (EL9569) areas is also characterised by Lachlan Orogen sequences, including the Gongolgon, Mount Kelly and Compton Downs granitic intrusions, previously identified as strongly fractionated granites with potential to host gold, copper, lead, zinc and tin (Slevin, 2011 ).
SRK CONSUL TING (AUSTRALASIA) PTY LTD ■ 27 MAY 2024 ■ SJ, CD, MD/JM
29
Independent Specialist Report on the Mineral Assets of Alice Queen Limited Project Setting - New South Wales • Final
Figure 3.3: Geological context of Yarindury and Mendooran projects
==> picture [422 x 594] intentionally omitted <==
----- Start of picture text -----
725000
Legend
Currant_Mlneral_ Tltl111
EL8646 YARINDURY
c:J
CJEL8469
0 CJEL8563
0
0
0 CJeLasas
8
SI
Regional Geology
Scale: 500,000
Office: AOL
CoNd11i\la 5)-l tm ODA 1094 MGA Zone SS I rf [1 ] • ' •
----- End of picture text -----
Source: Alice Queen Limited, 2019
SRK CONSUL TING (AUSTRALASIA) PTY LTD ■ 27 MAY 2024 ■ SJ, CD, MD/JM
30
Independent Specialist Report on the Mineral Assets of Alice Queen Limited Project Setting - New South Wales • Final
3.4 Previous exploration
Previous exploration activities undertaken by third-party companies over the tenure areas are summarised in Table 3.2.
Table 3.2: Summary of previous exploration - New South Wales tenement areas
| Period | Tenement | Company | Commodities and/or | Main activities |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| number | style of | |||
| mineralisation | ||||
| Mendooran | Project | |||
| 1970 | EL8141 | Kerr McGee | Uranium | Reverse circulation drill holes |
| Exploration | (2) | |||
| 1980s | Southwest of | Denison Australia | Sodium bicarbonate | Drilling |
| EL8469 | waters | |||
| 1982-1983 | EL 1887 | Geopeko Ltd | Porphyry copper | Rock chip samples |
| 1990 | BHP | Heavy mineral sands | Aircore drill holes (12) | |
| 2008-2009 | EL7118 | Newmont | Porphyry gold-copper | Reprocessing of the regional |
| magnetics data | ||||
| 2008 | Mendooran | Clancy Exploration | Porphyry gold-copper | Drilling (1 hole) |
| project tenure | ||||
| 2014 | EL8317 | AngloGold Ashanti | Porphyr gold-copper | Ground-based gravity survey |
| over southern part of the area | ||||
| 2015 | EL8141 | Fifth Element | Porphyr gold-copper | |
| Resources Ltd | ||||
| 2016 | ELA5207 | Holliday Geoscience | Porphyry gold-copper | Preliminary exploration |
| program | ||||
| 2017 | Southern of | Newcrest | Porphyr gold-copper | Airborne magnetic and |
| EL8469 | radiometrics survey | |||
| Yarindury Project | ||||
| 1967-1968 | EL047 | Placer Prospecting | Copper | Surface soil and auger |
| Pty Ltd | sampling, geophysics and | |||
| drilling | ||||
| 1970-1974 | EL0317 | Amax Iron Ore | Base metals | Mapping, extensive soil |
| Corporation | sampling, regional | |||
| aeromagnetic/radiometrics | ||||
| and IP survey | ||||
| 1981-1982 | EL1535 | Shell Minerals | Molybdenum | Mapping, soil sampling and |
| Exploration | magnetics | |||
| Australia Pty Ltd | ||||
| 1981-1990 | EL1684 | Cluff Oil (Australia) | Gold, base metals | Mapping |
| Pty Ltd | ||||
| 1982-1983 | EL 1887, | Geopeko Ltd | Copper, silver, skarn | Regional mapping, gravity |
| EL 1886 | mineralisation | survey, contouring of | ||
| aeromagnetic data, | ||||
| geochemical sampling |
SRK CONSULTING (AUSTRALASIA) PTY LTD • 27 MAY 2024 • SJ, CD, MD/JM
31
Independent Specialist Report on the Mineral Assets of Alice Queen Limited Project Setting - New South Wales • Final
| Period | Tenement | Company | Commodities and/or | Main activities |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| number | style of | |||
| mineralisation | ||||
| 1983-1985 | EL2081 | Nubola Pty | Gold | Stream sediment and soil |
| Ltd/Nationwide | sampling, detailed mapping | |||
| Resources Pty Ltd, | ||||
| Range Resources | ||||
| Ltd, Nicro | ||||
| Resources Ltd, | ||||
| Petrocarb | ||||
| Exploration Ltd | ||||
| 1984-1985 | EL2307 | Homestake | Gold | Drilling and re-assay |
| Australia Ltd | ||||
| 1984-1985 | EL2241 | Mount Isa Mines Ltd | Copper-gold porphyry | Aeromagnetic/radiometric |
| survey, and stream sediment, | ||||
| hand auger and rock chip | ||||
| sampling programs | ||||
| 1986-1990 | EL2838 | Ajax Joinery Pty | Gold-copper | Surface sampling, drilling |
| Ltd/Compass | ||||
| Resources NL, | ||||
| Terrex Resources | ||||
| NL | ||||
| 1987-1989 | EL2941 | Denison Australia | Sodium-bicarbonate | Diamond drilling |
| Pty Ltd/New | waters | |||
| Industrial Resources | ||||
| 1987-1989 | EL2899 | Compass | Copper-gold porphyry | Soil survey, drilling |
| Resources NL | ||||
| 1987-1990 | EL2758 | International Mining | Gold, base metals | Mapping, BLEG (bulk leach |
| Corporation/ | extractable gold) and rock | |||
| CRA Exploration Pty | chipping over several | |||
| Ltd | prospects | |||
| 1991-1995 | EL4528, | CRA Exploration Pty | Copper-gold porphyry | Geological mapping, |
| EL4472, | Ltd | aeromagnetic/radiometrics, | ||
| EL4407, | ground-based magnetic | |||
| ELA4406, | survey, soil and rock chip | |||
| EL4408 | sampling | |||
| 1995-1997 | EL4827, | Newcrest Mining Ltd | Copper-gold porphyry | Mapping and magnetic data |
| EL5098 | interpretation | |||
| 1996-1998 | EL5175 | Lachlan Fold Belt | Not specified | No exploration activities |
| Resources NL | reported | |||
| 1997-2005 | EL5318/ | Millennium Minerals | Copper-gold | Drilling |
| EL5623 | (Operations) Pty Ltd | porphyry, gold | ||
| 2000-2002 | EL5758 | Mount Isa Mines Ltd | Copper-gold porphyry | Airborne |
| magnetics/radiometrics survey | ||||
| 2004-2005 | EL6183 | Banalona Pty Ltd | Copper-gold porphyr | Desktop review,.re-gridding, |
| interpretation of airborne | ||||
| magnetic data, field | ||||
| reconnaissance and limited | ||||
| surface sampling | ||||
| 2007-2011 | EL6700 | Alkane Resources | Volcanogenic | Rock chip sampling |
| Ltd | massive sulphide | |||
| (VMS) base metals |
SRK CONSUL TING (AUSTRALASIA) PTY LTD • 27 MAY 2024 • SJ, CD, MD/JM
Independent Specialist Report on the Mineral Assets of Alice Queen Limited Project Selling - New South Wales ■ Final
| Period | Tenement | Company | Commodities and/or | Main activities |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| number | style of | |||
| mineralisation | ||||
| 2007-2008 | EL6724 | Golden Cross | Copper-gold porphyr | Field mapping and modelling |
| Operations Pty Ltd | systems | of airborne magnetic data | ||
| 2007-2009 | EL6875 | Rimfire Australia Pty | Copper-gold porphyry | Mapping, stream, soil and |
| Ltd | systems | rock sampling | ||
| 2008-2014 | EL7786, | Newmont | Porphyry gold-copper | Detailed mapping, surface |
| EL7064 | Exploration Pty Ltd | system | sampling, airborne magnetic/radiometrics surey, |
|
| IP surveys (including 3D), | ||||
| aircore drill holes (23) and | ||||
| diamond drilling (6) | ||||
| 2020-2021 | EL8985 | Monzodiorite Pty Ltd | Gold | Desktop review |
| Overlap | EL4750/5031 | New Industrial | Sodium-bicarbonate | Ground-based magnetic |
| Resources Pty | waters, diamonds, | traverses, soil sampling | ||
| Ltd/Ashton Mining | platinum group metals | |||
| Ltd | (PGM) |
Source: SRK compilation of historical reports
3.5 Exploration activities
Historical exploration within the tenement areas conducted by Alice Queen is summarised in Table 3.3.
Table 3.3: Alice Queen's exploration activities by tenement - New South Wales
| Period | Project | Tenement | Activities completed |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2016-2022 | Mendooran | EL8469 | Airborne magnetics and radiometrics, ground-based gravity |
| surveys, water sampling, diamond drilling (3 holes - | |||
| MEMD0001-003), drill hole sampling for gold and multi- | |||
| elements. Diamond drilling (2 holes - 21 MEDH001 and | |||
| 21MEDH002), drill hole sampling for gold and multi-elements, | |||
| petrological analysis | |||
| 2017-2023 | Yarindury | EL8646 | 11 mud rotary-diamond holes (19YDDH001-6A and |
| 20YDDH007-10), 2 diamond drill holes in the Boda East area | |||
| (20BEDH001-2), drill hole sampling for gold, copper, multi- | |||
| elements, geophysical data reprocessing, geochemistry | |||
| studies, petrological analysis, 9 diamond drill holes | |||
| (20BEDH003-009 and 21BEDH010-011 ), drill hole sampling | |||
| 2023-2024 | Byrock | EL9568 | Geological mapping |
| 2023-2024 | Gongolgon | EL99569 | Geological mapping |
Source: SRK
3.6 Mineral Resources
No Mineral Resources are presently defined within Alice Queen's New South Wales tenements.
SRK CONSULTING (AUSTRALASIA) PTY LTD ■ 27 MAY 2024 ■ SJ, CD, MD/JM
33
Independent Specialist Report on the Mineral Assets of Alice Queen Limited Project Selling - New South Wales ■ Final
3. 7 Exploration targets and prospectivity
Alice Queen's ongoing exploration efforts in New South Wales are focused on targeting porphyry related mineralisation along the northern extension of the Molong Volcanic Belt, underlying a post mineral cover at Mendooran (EL8469) and Yarindury (EL8646).
Alice Queen's tenements also encompass outcropping areas of the Molong Volcanic Belt at the eastern limit of the recently discovered porphyry at Boda East (Figure 3.4). The porphyry prospectivity of this volcanic belt is supported by the occurrence of the Cadia and Copper Hill porphyry systems along strike to the south (Alice Queen Limited, ASX announcement, 9 January 2023).
SRK CONSUL TING (AUSTRALASIA) PTY LTD ■ 27 MAY 2024 ■ SJ, CD, MD/JM
34
Independent Specialist Report on the Mineral Assets of Alice Queen Limited Project Setting - New South Wales ■ Final
Figure 3.4: Molong Volcanic Belt trend extension through Alice Queen's tenements
==> picture [393 x 560] intentionally omitted <==
Source: Alice Queen Limited, 2023
Notes: Regional airborne magnetics (TMIRTP) in the background showing the Molong Volcanic Belt strong anomaly northwards under cover.
35
SRK CONSULTING (AUSTRALASIA) PTY LTD ■ 27 MAY 2024 ■ SJ, CD, MD/JM
Independent Specialist Report on the Mineral Assets of Alice Queen Limited Project Selling - New South Wales ■ Final
3.7.1 Yarindury project (EL8646)
Key targets in the Yarindury project are discussed below:
Boda East prospect: Exploration target adjacent to Alkane's Boda deposit (Figure 3.5) (Alkane Resources Limited, ASX announcement, 9 January 2023). Recent drilling by Alice Queen in 2022 intercepted porphyry-style mineralisation, alteration and veining ~700 m from the eastern boundary of the Boda porphyry system (Figure 3.6). The most relevant intersection zones for drill hole 22BEDH001 (Figure 3.7) (Alice Queen Limited, ASX announcement, 31 December 2022), including mineralisation and alteration, were:
-
26-49 m: Porphyritic dykes intruding basalt near surface, associated with quartz veins carrying minor coarse chalcopyrite and pyrite with pink alteration halos reflecting haematite dusting of feldspar; visible chalcopyrite up to 0.05% and pyrite up to 0.5%.
-
65-71 m: Coarse-grained chalcopyrite and minor coarse-grained bornite in moderately calc silicate altered basalt, including sulphides hosted in fractured basalt and epidote-carbonate potassium feldspar veins; visible chalcopyrite ± bornite of 0.2% and pyrite 1 %.
-
51-369 m: Moderate to strongly focused epidote alteration and vein-hosted calc-silicates, including garnet and actinolite.
-
736-745 m: Coarse-grained and disseminated chalcopyrite and pyrite within a strong biotite haematite-epidote alteration; visible chalcopyrite up to 0.35% and pyrite up to 1 %.
-
736-745 m: Strong to moderate biotite-haematite-epidote alteration, associated with the deeper mineralisation interval of 723-780 m.
While assays for the drill hole 22BEDH001 have been received (Alice Queen Limited, ASX announcement, 13 December 2023), the interpretation and compilation work are currently on hold due to the suspension of exploration activities on the project led by ongoing capital constraints The sulfide abundance, intersection of porphyry-style alteration and veining suggest that the system remains open along a north-south oriented mineralised corridor (Figure 3.6).
SRK CONSULTING (AUSTRALASIA) PTY LTD • 27 MAY 2024 ■ SJ, CD, MD/JM
36
Independent Specialist Report on the Mineral Assets of Alice Queen Limited Project Setting - New South Wales • Final
Figure 3.5: Lach Ian Orogen projects with location of Boda East shown
==> picture [419 x 547] intentionally omitted <==
----- Start of picture text -----
149 [°] 00'E 149 [°] 30'E
Tt!nem1ml flcmmfary
32•oo·s
MaJor f'roJect
P1ospoct
Drill Holo
Molone Volcanic Dell
Unrlerr.over Molnng
Volcanic Belt
(Marsins Interpreted)
Other parts of
Macqu;ulr. Arc
r
J2 [°] JO'S
J ; /7 TOMINGLEY
812kor Au m@ 0.25'1(. Cu 1nd 0ODA I KSDD007 .551/t Au
I PEAK Hill
108kor Au
'
NORTH PARKES
SOMt @l 1.1% Cu and O.Sg/t Au
n•oo·s
COPPER Hill
310kt Cu and 890kor Au
-
-�
'::re -'=
0 - 25km.
Projection: Lat/long (GDA94)
148 [°] 30'E
Source: Alice Queen Limited, ASX announcement, 9 January 2023
Notes: 22BEDH011 drill hole collar location shown.
----- End of picture text -----
SRK CONSULTING (AUSTRALASIA) PTY LTD ■ 27 MAY 2024 • SJ, CD, MD/JM
37
Independent Specialist Report on the Mineral Assets of Alice Queen Limited Project Setting - New South Wales • Final
Figure 3.6: Mineralisation corridor identified in Boda East
==> picture [416 x 497] intentionally omitted <==
----- Start of picture text -----
Z0BEDHOOB 5eled Intercepts:
Im O 0.J.41/1 Au. 0.ll1' Cu fr UOm
1m 00.01 II• Au.0.151'Cu r,u..,
7m fl 0.011/thi, 0.071' Cu fr"""
""'• Jm f1 0. [0] 1 1/I Au, O.UII Cu fr 67111
11m @I O.Ol'lHu fr 73Jm N
lnel. Im IIPOOI f/1Au,O.t5!'tulr 1llm
Ind lmO 0.011/t Au, 0.Jt1'Cll fr 7llm
nlld lmllP D Ll1'Cufr 'Blm
Z0BEDH00S Select Intercepts:
7m 11P o 01 g/1 Au, o.on; Cu fr mm
1n,1 35m • n,01-,11 All, 0.11 ru lr 11& � ..
• [mllPO.IJl/rAu,0][.][l][etl.CufrWm ]
ln(I. Jm IP O,JS 1/1 Au and 0.131' Cu fr SO&m
Im f!I 0.09 s/1 llu, 0,1"' Cu fr $tlm
Ind, lm � u.241/1 Au, 0AS'6 Cir fr S98rn
&m l!!I 0.01 1/1 Au, 0.07't, cu fr 617m
lmlPDC14g/tAu,a l'll'Culr&Um
amen, 6ou�dO')'
OX D1illhlll1! (with tr•c
nd lntersl!ct{onJ
5Jlur1n,, Volp;nfc.t
GranodlQrlte l'orphyry
Monronltc Por ot,yry
blorlte
Nun M.t&lll'tit Ordov1n..1n
lR!cn':!b� Ordovician
Volc.anlcs
lllnh- F,111lh
691soemE
----- End of picture text -----
Source: Alice Queen Limited, ASX announcement, 2 November 2022. Notes: Drill holes projected on the surface with geology in the background.
38
SRK CONSULTING (AUSTRALASIA) PTY LTD ■ 27 MAY 2024 ■ SJ, CD, MD/JM
Independent Specialist Report on the Mineral Assets of Alice Queen Limited Project Setting - New South Wales • Final
Figure 3.7: Alteration and veining in mineralised zone at Boda East drill hole 20BEDH011
==> picture [329 x 412] intentionally omitted <==
Source: Alice Queen Limited, ASX announcement, 2 November 2022 Notes: Pyrite-chalcopyrite in porphyry-style vein (on the top), coarse chalcopyrite-bornite-pyrite (middle), and coarse chalcopyrite (bottom).
3. 7 .2 Mendooran project (EL8469)
Exploration by Alice Queen at Mendooran (EL8469) has targeted airborne magnetic anomalies interpreted to be associated with gravity lows and reflecting igneous complexes (Figure 3.8) (Rama Geoscience, 2017). Alice Queen completed four holes testing the anomalies and intercepted andesitic rocks which are interpreted to form part of the Molong Volcanic Belt. These results confirm the northwards continuation of the prospective Ordovician host rocks. Two of the targets defined by this geophysical interpretation exercise remain untested.
==> picture [5 x 65] intentionally omitted <==
SRK CONSULTING (AUSTRALASIA) PTY LTD ■ 27 MAY 2024 ■ SJ, CD, MD/JM
39
Independent Specialist Report on the Mineral Assets of Alice Queen Limited Project Setting - New South Wales • Final
Figure 3.8: Mendooran unconstrained 3D magnetic inversion and targets
==> picture [416 x 336] intentionally omitted <==
----- Start of picture text -----
-6,455,000 nfl
,450,000 ,rN
,445,000 IT'N
,440,000 rrfi
-6,-t35,000 rrH
Source: Alice Queen, date
----- End of picture text -----
Notes: Refined 100 m cell model. Depth slices at 275 m (left) and 757 m (right) below surface. Potential target areas and outline of Mendooran airborne magnetics survey shown.
Alice Queen's regional data review indicates a northwest-trending cross-arc structure within the Goonoo State Conservation Area (Figure 3.9;Alice Queen Limited, ASX announcement, 31 December 2022). These cross-arc structures are noted as potential control on the location of porphyry deposits throughout the Macquarie Arc (Glen and Wyborn, 1997). Alice Queen designed two holes to test this cross-arc structure target, but these remained to be completed at the time of reporting.
SRK CONSULTING (AUSTRALASIA) PTY LTD ■ 27 MAY 2024 • SJ, CD, MD/JM
40
Independent Specialist Report on the Mineral Assets of Alice Queen Limited Project Setting - New South Wales • Final
Figure 3.9: Planned drill holes targeting residual total magnetic intensity with NW-NSE cross-arc structures
==> picture [326 x 455] intentionally omitted <==
----- Start of picture text -----
l�WfylJU'I
D s.H,and�a. J
D fol\ ��
,. .. i �lltffl(r.(�
·---, �
(!) �0,)1( !
0 [....,] [o., ]
• f•\fl!t Dr"hOlt
,
, =� .lftC
,, .. .,.. hW•.HOoUSllUCh,,.
� .. .) �u ,-• .. • .. 1 :: GooftNUi«�ICICNI ,. f
__ ....····-.... ,
, .. }© .... I , ,
'
(I)
.
. .
.. :, \ .. \
••.. , I ••. 0
i'
I .. �
I
1 ® '
···· ·
t
I -�-••,••
... .. .. J I . .... [.. ] , ,•· .•
·····i I .
•.. [... ] I ••• .
, ..
,,.-·,. . ... r
----- End of picture text -----
Source: Alice Queen Limited, ELB469 Annual Report, 2022
3.7.3 Byrock (EL9568) and Gongolgon (EL99569) projects
Alice Queen performed a preliminary reconnaissance across the area, including mapping and rock chip geochemical sampling. The assay results were pending (Alice Queen Limited, ASX announcement, 31 January 2024) at the time of SRK's review. Rare earth elements (REE) are the main local target commodity due to the proximity (~65 km) to the Sky Metals' Doradilla REE project and other outcropping granites (Figure 3.10 and Figure 3.11) (Alice Queen Limited, ASX announcement, 30 June 2023).
SRK CONSULTING (AUSTRALASIA) PTY LTD ■ 27 MAY 2024 ■ SJ, CD, MD/JM
41
Independent Specialist Report on the Mineral Assets of Alice Queen Limited Project Selling - New South Wales • Final
Figure 3.10: Byrock and Gongolgon projects and adjacent tenements including Sky Metals' Doradilla REE project
==> picture [341 x 270] intentionally omitted <==
----- Start of picture text -----
(Gr•nted)
OartMlnlr,gTenement
Sky Metals
Doradillil r10Ject
LetatyMlnerats
Olher Tenement
----- End of picture text -----
Source: Alice Queen Limited, ASX announcement, 31 January 2023
Figure 3.11: Granodiorite with local pegmatite in Alice Queen's tenement
==> picture [341 x 270] intentionally omitted <==
----- Start of picture text -----
425ooomE 450ooomE
6650ooomN
6625ooomN
Projo<lioo· Laliloog (GOA94)
450ooomE 475o<omE
----- End of picture text -----
Source: Alice Queen Limited, ASX announcement, 31 October 2023
42
SRK CONSULTING (AUSTRALASIA) PTY LTD • 27 MAY 2024 ■ SJ, CD, MD/JM
Independent Specialist Report on the Mineral Assets of Alice Queen Limited Project Setting - New South Wales • Final
3.8 SRK's opinion
Alice Queen's tenements in New South Wales are hosted by the Molong Volcanic Belt, a belt of magmatic rocks with demonstrated potential to host world-class porphyry copper-gold deposits. While the Company's projects are at an early stage, the extension of porphyry-style alteration veining onto the Boda East tenement and untested geophysical anomalies under post-mineral cover at Mendooran represent robust exploration targets that are worthy of additional exploration. It should be noted that persistent exploration in this fertile magmatic arc over the long term led to Alkane's discovery of the Boda porphyry. Alice Queen's tenements offer significant exploration upside and provide potential for the discovery of porphyry copper-gold deposits as seen elsewhere throughout the Macquarie Arc.
SRK notes that interpretation of 20BEDH011 is currently suspended due to operational requirements. Information from this drill hole may therefore be insufficient to allow additional drill targets to be developed at Boda East at the current time.
SRK notes that some of the Mendooran geophysical targets occur in an area impacted by environmental restrictions to exploration. Despite Alice Queen acquiring permits for drilling in the area, these environmental requirements may impact the timeframe required to follow up any potential intersections achieved in the area.
In its ASX announcement on 24 April 2023, Alice Queen refers to diversification into battery minerals in the Byrock and Gongolgon permits. SRK considered the associated mineral occurrences for REE and lithium associated with the granites as well as based being on adjacent property to that style of mineralisation. No assay data were made available to SRK for consideration.
SRK considers that copper-gold is still a strong indication of value in Alice Queen's tenements while there is a variety of different potential mineral styles evaluated by the Company.
SRK CONSUL TING (AUSTRALASIA) PTY LTD • 27 MAY 2024 ■ SJ, CD, MD/JM
43
Independent Specialist Report on the Mineral Assets of Alice Queen Limited Part B: International Mineral Assets • Final
Part B: International Mineral Assets
SRK CONSUL TING (AUSTRALASIA) PTY LTD • 27 MAY 2024 ■ SJ, CD, MD/JM
44
Independent Specialist Report on the Mineral Assets of Alice Queen Limited Project Setting - Fiji ■ Final
4 Project Setting - Fiji
Alice Queen holds a 100% interest in three tenements in Fiji (Table 4.1), known as the Nabila, Sabeto and Viani projects. Currently, only the Sabeto tenure is granted. The remaining tenures are under renewal.
Table 4.1: Status of Alice Queen's mineral tenures in Fiji as at the Valuation Date
| Title | Project | Status | Grant dateExpiry date | Area | Annual rent | Annual |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (region) | **(km2) ** | expenditure | ||||
| (blocks) | commitment | |||||
| SPL 1513 | Viani, | Renewal | 06/01/202106/01/2024 | ~27 | Under renewal | Proposed |
| Fiji | process | (1) | process | FJ$1.85M | ||
| over three | ||||||
| years | ||||||
| SPL 1514 | Nabila, | Renewal | 06/01/202106/01/2024 | ~208 | Under renewal | Proposed |
| Fiji | process | (1) | process | FJ$1.65M | ||
| over three | ||||||
| years | ||||||
| SPL 1518 | Sabeto, | Granted | 13/12/202212/12/2025 | ~14 | Total performance | FJ$600,000 |
| Fiji | (1) | bond and | over three | |||
| environmental bond | years, | |||||
| Year 1 - FJ$10,000 | expiring in | |||||
| Year 2 - FJ$20,000 | 12 Dec 2025 | |||||
| Year 3 - FJ$30,000 |
Source: SRK
4.1 Location and infrastructure
The Fiji archipelago lies in the South Pacific Ocean and comprises a set of two large, and >300 smaller islands. Of these, only ~110 are inhabited. Daily flights connect Fiji to Australia, New Zealand, Asia and America and enable access to the major islands of Viti Levu and Vanua Levu, where Alice Queen's tenements are located (Figure 4.1 ).
The Nabila project on Viti Levu is situated approximately 40 km southwest of Fiji's capital, Nadi, and is less than 5 km distance from the historical Mistry gold mine. To the northeast of Nadi, the Sabeto project is approximately 20 km away, within the Sabeto range, between the Vuda area (Ding Jing Pte Ltd) and Tuvatu underground gold mine (Lion One Metals).
As Viti Levu is the largest and most populated island in Fiji, it has well-developed infrastructure that includes a network of roads, two international airports, seaports, and urban utilities that facilitate both domestic and international connectivity. Both Alice Queen's projects lie in proximity to Nadi airport, with the Nabila project ~45 minutes' drive to the south and the Sabeto project less than 10 minutes' drive to the east. Ground access to the tenements is from the main Queens Road, which is one of the highways encircling the island and connecting major towns/cities. The Port of Lautoka, situated ~20 km north of Nadi's airport, is one of the island's seaports and is equipped to handle container ships and other large vessels. Viti Levu hosts well-developed infrastructure in the form of water supply, sewage systems, electricity, hospitals and telecommunications services, including internet and mobile phone services across most of the island.
SRK CONSUL TING (AUSTRALASIA) PTY LTD ■ 27 MAY 2024 ■ SJ, CD, MD/JM
45
Independent Specialist Report on the Mineral Assets of Alice Queen Limited Project Setting - Fiji ■ Final
The Viani project is situated on Fiji's second largest island, Vanua Levu, and lies approximately 35 km to the east of Savusavu (city) where the closest airport is located. The infrastructure on Vanua Levu is less developed than on Viti Levu, but includes roads, airports, ports, utilities and public services. A network of roads connects key towns such as Labasa and Savusavu, and several airstrips such as at Labasa and Savusavu offer domestic flights to and from Viti Levu and other islands. The Nabouwalu Port on the south coast connects Vanua Levu to Viti Levu by ferry services. Vanua Levu's infrastructure includes electricity, water supply and hospitals. The mobile and internet services are less reliable in more remote areas.
Figure 4.1: Location and access to Alice Queen's mineral projects in Fiji
==> picture [421 x 343] intentionally omitted <==
----- Start of picture text -----
Au1tr1II•
Allco Quoon Tonomont
Appl/cation
Major Project
Major Road
• Places
----- End of picture text -----
Source: Alice Queen Limited
4.1.1 Physiography and climate
Viti Levu features a central mountain range. The highest peak, Mount Tomanivi (1,324 m), divides the island climatically and geographically into a wetter southeastern side and a drier northwestern side. The coastal areas of the island are characterised by flat river plains, fringed by coral reefs, while the interior comprises rainforests.
The climate of Viti Levu is tropical, mostly warm and humid throughout the year, with the wet season occurring usually from November to April; tropical cyclones may occur.
SRK CONSUL TING (AUSTRALASIA) PTY LTD ■ 27 MAY 2024 ■ SJ, CD, MD/JM
46
Independent Specialist Report on the Mineral Assets of Alice Queen Limited Project Setting - Fiji ■ Final
The western and northern parts of the island where Alice Queen's Nabila and Sabeto projects are located are dryer, while the southeastern part receives more rainfall.
The topography of Vanua Levu is also marked by a central mountain range occurring from the southeast to the northwest, with peaks reaching over 1,000 m. The range divides the island into northern and southern coasts, with the former being rich in fertile plains, while the southern coast is steeper. The climate is also warm and humid year-round, with the wet season including very heavy rainfall from November to April, especially on the southeastern side, where the Viani project is located.
4.2 Regional geology
The Fiji Islands evolved over the Fiji Platform - a block of anomalously thick former arc lithosphere (Clarke et al., 2022) - in a complex boundary zone between the Inda-Australian and Pacific plates, where the Tonga and Vanuatu arcs represent two opposing subduction zones. Several active spreading ridges and transform-faulting zones flank the platform to the west (North Fiji Basin), south (South Fiji Basin) and east (Lau back-arc basin), as a reflex of the subduction divergence (e.g. Begg and Gray, 2002; Sun et al., 2017). The Fijian islands record the tectonic/volcanic stages related to the evolution of the Outer Melanesian Arc, including syn-subduction, transitional and post-subduction and later remnant-arc phases, over a ~40 Ma period (e.g. Begg and Gray, 2002). These convergent margin tectonics provide potential for mineral systems forming Au, Cu, Ag, Mn, Cu, Wand REE mineralisation styles related to subduction initiation, cessation, extension, rifting and basin formation, shortening and basin inversion (e.g. Clarke et al., 2022).
SRK CONSULTING (AUSTRALASIA) PTY LTD ■ 27 MAY 2024 ■ SJ, CD, MD/JM
47
Independent Specialist Report on the Mineral Assets of Alice Queen Limited Project Selling - Fiji ■ Final
Figure 4.2: Tectonic setting of the southwest Pacific and geological map of Fiji
==> picture [415 x 316] intentionally omitted <==
----- Start of picture text -----
u•t 171'E 171'& Ut•E 1H'E
LEGEND
-
Q\Mlrlll,Wf\'llk•nk IOfh
lhH•u111/c:,lu11k Grnupl
-
D ::i�:��:;::���l�' .. :t [1] �;:��(I\
- [:,���,��•�:�] 1�<•�:=i�•nl11och
11'1 D D �:�!��.1;:,:·:::�1:��n;: [:;��� ] ��� [.. ] [:�-uilko r111 ,101.n• ]
D ���� •rid �mol•••<J• Volc,nlf r.10t1Jl'IQn 1::,,n,,t'illnwnt,1y101li
Hllh l,trl,Uou11,,01,.,,k,fplulonl1I
10c I 1tMon)ry I ,er Vok•nk Ci1oup1 l.1lr,_liot"t'llt•l.11Jyrlloft11t'¥Ok1nh
OROUI' 1,1.- Mlounr• l.11ocl11twr .. ,Yok.1 �, rliocrnl" ,ok,11lc k G1oupl
Paddy' (Aul 'I1,1, Miocrnr-l.1•�1rtio1r11, ie ,11 , IIX I 1IUdt1 Vok .1 1( G11)up)
. . l.iltl,,fiQCt1u•,N.Jlmrnl11y10fh U,.1 1».1,U,dUl.l.anollu1o1G1oup)
1,1 .. Oli11ou·11r-Miit.ll.-J.tlounr
., volu11k-ttdlmrn1,ry101h
J)'"' (W,i11lm,l,G1011p)
l•ll'IOfl'1t �f•1tyOl'\l<lfnc
Yol,,nk•plulonk 10(lJfV•Yun,1 G1011p)
. . 20 SCALE 40 60 I0Km
(b)
111•e 111•1
----- End of picture text -----*
Source: Sun et al., 2017
Syn-subduction lithologies correlate to magmatic activity (> 10 Ma) along the former Vitiaz Arc. The oldest rocks in the region are the Yavuna Group (Late Eocene-Early Oligocene) (Sun et al., 2017) to the west of Viti Levu Island, with lavas and intrusive rocks of tholeiitic and boninitic composition representing proto-arc activity (Figure 4.2). Unconformably above the Yavuna Group, the Wainimala Group (32-13 Ma) (Hathway, 1993) represents a well-exposed syn-subduction unit on Viti Levu (Figure 4.2), with calc-alkaline arc volcanism. Collisional events during the transitional phase have initiated orogeny in Fiji, flipping the subduction processes to the east-dipping Vanuatu zone, while activating transform systems and developing sedimentary basins. The Fiji Platform was rotated counterclockwise between ~5 Ma and 4.6 Ma, followed by north-south compression, basin inversion and crustal thickening, and subsequent reduction of volcanic activity in Viti Levu (e.g. Begg and Gray, 2002; Chen et al., 2019; Clarke et al., 2022). Post-subduction shoshonitic lavas erupted through extensional basins from Late Miocene to Early Pliocene along the northeast trending Viti Levu lineament. Shoshonitic and high-K calc-alkaline volcanic centres such as the Tavua, Navilawa, Sabeto, Fadis and Raki-Raki constitute the Mineralised Gold Belt (Figure 4.3) that extends from Viti Levu to Vanua Levu, including several mi.neralised locations at Vatukoula/Emperor gold mine and the Tuvatu deposit (e.g. Begg and Gray, 2002; Clarke et al., 2022).
SRK CONSULTING (AUSTRALASIA) PTY LTD ■ 27 MAY 2024 ■ SJ, CD, MD/JM
48
Independent Specialist Report on the Mineral Assets of Alice Queen Limited Project Setting - Fiji ■ Final
Figure 4.3: Map showing major gold and copper-gold deposits and the Mineralised Gold Belt in Fiji
==> picture [421 x 330] intentionally omitted <==
----- Start of picture text -----
Viti Levu gravity A
contours (mgal)
�rth
0
1-20
20 I
•
I.T
,
Friert.:, RiVF�r 0 1200 klll
Wafi Golpu
\�--..Panguncv
i,
Fauro lsl. Vatukoula
n'..
Gold Ridge
'
....•· .. , . . Kotoula I ) ' ••
0 50km TUVATU
�-Lihir
----- End of picture text -----
==> picture [81 x 6] intentionally omitted <==
----- Start of picture text -----
Source: Clarke et al., 2022
----- End of picture text -----
Notes: Gravity contours in the background.
In Vanua Levu, the rocks also reflect the evolution of the Fiji Platform; however, most of the island is underlain by Late Miocene to Pliocene strata as basalt, andesite and dacite intercalated with sedimentary rocks. Units such as the Natewa Volcanic Group are cut by andesite plugs with associated breccia sheets and basaltic provinces such as the Dakuniba Peninsula (Woodrow, 1976). Additional high-niobium basalts in Vanua Levu represent a younger post-subduction (non shoshonitic) late-stage rifting (<3.5-3 Ma) (Whelan et al., 1985) that may be correlated with basaltic-andesite dykes at the Tuvatu area in Viti Levu (Clarke et al., 2022).
4.3 Local geology
4.3.1 Viti Levu
In the southeast of Viti Levu, the Nabila project comprising a single tenement (SPL 1514) is underlain by Late Oligocene to Middle Miocene tufts, lava flows and volcaniclastic sediments of the Wainimala Group (e.g. Davis, 1988). These rocks are in contact with the Yavuna Group to the northeast, outside of the project limits, and are intruded by the Middle to Late Miocene Colo Plutonics (11.6-5.3 Ma), including diorite and gabbro from the Uciwai Igneous Complex.
SRK CONSULTING (AUSTRALASIA) PTY LTD ■ 27 MAY 2024 ■ SJ, CD, MD/JM
49
Independent Specialist Report on the Mineral Assets of Alice Queen Limited Project Setting - Fiji ■ Final
The volcano-sedimentary rocks of the Wainimala Group typically host the known gold mineralisation in epithermal stockwork and vein systems (Geopacific Resources Limited, 2016). Gossan, veins, fractures and shears, strong phyllic alteration in microdiorite, and quartz-carbonate clay polymetallic breccia with hydrothermal textures, were recognised by previous explorers within the project area (e.g. Rose, 2001 ). A 2 km long corridor between the historical Faddy's prospect and Mistry mine, within the Nabila project, encompasses gold mineralisation within well-bedded volcaniclastic sediments and limestones, interbedded with vesicular trachytic-basaltic flows, agglomerates and flow breccias; rhyolite and dacite also occur. The mineralisation zones are correlated to breccias, veins and advanced argillic alteration in a northeast-trending shear zone dipping ~50[° ] to the northwest, near the contact between dolerites and underlying tuft. The ore consists of gold and pyrite, with minor chalcopyrite, sphalerite and galena (e.g. Millenium Mining, 1999; 2002; 2005; Pontifex & Associates, 2009).
Further to the northeast of Viti Levu, the Sabeto project (SPL 1518) lies in the Sabeto Valley, between the Vuda gold prospect (Ding Jing Pte Ltd) and the Tuvatu gold deposit (Lion One Metals Ltd). It forms the 'Vuda-Sabeto-Tuvatu' geological complex along the northeast-trending Viti Levu lineament. The underlying geology encompasses a series of alkalic (shoshonitic) magmas such as the Pliocene lavas of the Sabeto Volcanics (5.35 Ma; Hatcher, 1998), and monzonites, micro monzonites, feldspar porphyry syenites, and andesite dykes of the Nawainiu Intrusive Complex (~5.4-4.6 Ma), both part of the Korroimavua Group (Hathway, 1993). These rocks are in contact with older sedimentary rocks of the Nadi Group, which have been uncomfortably overlain by a polymictic clast-supported volcanic breccia.
Field observations from past explorers led to recognition of a hydrothermally altered diatreme angular breccia, intersected by thin narrow mineralised veins outcropping the Nawainiu Intrusive Complex, interpreted as the carapace above the porphyry system (Geopacific Resources Limited, ASX announcement, 27 June 2012). Recently, the Nawainiu monzonite was correlated to a porphyry gold-copper system, including sanidine feldspar porphyry dykes and the presence of phyllic alteration and venting features (Alice Queen Limited, ASX announcement, 26 February 2024). There is also indication of dissolution features (vugs) caused by the intense alteration, resulting in late-stage pyrite replacement. In the nearby Tuvatu gold deposit, the alkalic (shoshonitic) rocks from the Navilawa volcanic centre are interpreted as the source of metals precipitating in subvertical, narrow quartz veins and lodes, sporadically associated with carbonates, roscoelite and K-feldspar alteration. Gold-tellurides or pyrite also occur. The mineralised quartz veins in Tuvatu are correlated to the same type of monzonites as those in the Nawainiu Intrusive Complex (Alice Queen Limited, ASX announcement, 5 April 2023).
4.3.2 Vanua Levu
The Viani project area (SPL 1513) is largely dominated by basaltic lavas, breccias and volcanic tufts of the Dakuniba Volcanics, part of the Natewa Group (Early to Late Pliocene), and the Mbua basalts (olivine and augite) with interbedded sediments. The occurrence of basaltic and gabbroic dykes hosting mineralisation within the Dakuniba Basalts is interpreted as part of a syn-volcanic multi-stage low to intermediate sulphidation epithermal system. Supporting evidence includes the historical drilling intercepting vein structures and gold at shallow levels (<150 m) and field observations including gold mineralisation in quartz veins with disseminated pyrite, sulfides, other base metals and alteration, related to subvertical shear zones.
SRK CONSULTING (AUSTRALASIA) PTY LTD ■ 27 MAY 2024 ■ SJ, CD, MD/JM
50
Independent Specialist Report on the Mineral Assets of Alice Queen Limited Project Setting - Fiji ■ Final
4.4 Previous exploration
Previous exploration in the Nabila project tenement area (SPL 1514) was performed by several companies and focused mostly on gold, with minor assessment of other base metals (Table 4.2).
Table 4.2: Summary of previous exploration - Nabila project (SPL 1514)
| Period | Tenement | Company | Commodities | Main activities |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| number | and/or style of | |||
| mineralisation | ||||
| 1935-1952 | PL241, | Historical | Gold, silver, lead | First gold occurrences, followed by the |
| SPL 1216 | records | beginning of a small-scale gold, silver and | ||
| lead mining in the Mistry mine in -1935. | ||||
| Reports of small tonnage of manganese | ||||
| deposits. | ||||
| 1975-1983 | SPL 1216 | Emperor Gold | Gold | Drilling at Mistry mine indicated occurrences |
| Mining | of mineralisation. | |||
| 1984-1987 | SPL 1216 | Hallcroft, | Gold | Literature review, geological mapping, soil |
| Climax Mining | sampling and percussion drilling with | |||
| Ltd | identification of gold mineralisation and the | |||
| Faddy's gold prospect. | ||||
| 1987-1999 | SPL 1216 | Climax Mining | Epithermal gold | Fieldwork with regional and detailed |
| Ltd | geological mapping (1 :1,000), Faddy's | |||
| prospect drilling (percussion, diamond, | ||||
| reverse circulation), trenching, geophysical | ||||
| (aeromagnetic VTEM and IP surveys), | ||||
| stream, soil and rock (outcrop) sampling | ||||
| campaigns, geochemistry assays, | ||||
| petrological studies. | ||||
| 1999-2008 | SPL 1216 | Millenium | Epithermal gold | Re-logging of drilling samples, geological |
| Mining | mapping focusing on structural analysis, soil | |||
| geochemistry campaigns and additional | ||||
| diamond drilling, statistical analysis. | ||||
| 2009-2016 | SPL 1216 | Geopacific | Epithermal gold | Several diamond drilling campaigns with |
| Resources Limited |
multi-element geochemistry analysis, soil geochemistr at the north of Mistry mine, |
|||
| DDIP survey, trenching over Faddy's | ||||
| prospect, metallurgical testing, drill hole | ||||
| reaching 850 m (NBD0001) targeted a magnetic anomaly searching fr porphyry |
||||
| systems, 3D airborne VTEM/ZTEM survey, | ||||
| surface magnetic survey, petrological | ||||
| studies, and resource estimation (pre-JORC | ||||
| Code 2012). |
Source: SRK compilation of historical reports
Exploration at Sabeto (SPL 1518) was mainly focused on copper-gold targets, while both areas are covered by regional geophysical surveys (ZTEM, VTEM, radiometrics and magnetics). The previous exploration is summarised in Table 4.3.
SRK CONSULTING (AUSTRALASIA) PTY LTD ■ 27 MAY 2024 ■ SJ, CD, MD/JM
51
Independent Specialist Report on the Mineral Assets of Alice Queen Limited Project Setting - Fiji ■ Final
Table 4.3: Summary of previous exploration - Sabeto project (SPL 1518)
| Period | Tenement | Company | Commodities | Main activities |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| number | and/or style of | |||
| mineralisation | ||||
| 1976-1979 | SPL 1116 | Aquitaine Fidji | Copper, lead | Stream sediment and soil sampling, |
| geological mapping, ground magnetics, IP | ||||
| survey and diamond drilling near Tarwaravi | ||||
| Creek. Copper anomalies were recognised | ||||
| in soil samples, but only weak base metal | ||||
| mineralisation was intersected in the drill | ||||
| cores (Colley and Flint, 1995). | ||||
| 1994-2010 | SPL 1361 | Emperor Gold | Porphyry copper- | Stream sediment, soil and rock sampling, |
| Mining | gold | trenching. | ||
| 2010-2016 | SPL 1368 | Geopacific | Porphyry copper- | Stream sediments, geological mapping, rock |
| Resources | gold | sampling and petrological analysis, | ||
| Limited | trenching, ZTEM and IP surveys, diamond | |||
| drilling peripheral to the diatreme target intercepted sanidine feldspar porphyr |
||||
| dykes anomalous in copper and gold | ||||
| (Geopacific Resources Limited, ASX | ||||
| announcement, 7 May 2012). Porphyry | ||||
| section interpretation. |
Source: SRK
The Viani project area (SPL 1513) includes a relatively significant amount of historical data from exploration work focused on gold and occasionally other secondary commodities. Regional-scale magnetic and radiometric geophysical data also cover the entire tenement area as shown in Table 4.4.
Table 4.4: Summary of previous exploration - Viani project (SPL 1513)
| Period | Tenement | Previous | Commodities | Main activities |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| number | explorers | and/or style of | ||
| mineralisation | ||||
| 1986-1992 | SPL 1246 | Pacific Island | Epithermal gold | Stream sediment, soil and rock chip |
| Gold NL | sampling campaigns, geological mapping, | |||
| airborne magnetic survey, petrographic | ||||
| studies, X-ray diffraction (XRD) analysis, | ||||
| detailed geological sampling, | ||||
| magnetotellurics survey, percussion drilling | ||||
| and trenching. Data review and assessment | ||||
| identified a 3 km long anomaly with assays | ||||
| resulting in gold >10 ppm (soil) and >1 g/t | ||||
| (rock). | ||||
| 1996-1998 | Metal Mining | Epithermal gold, | Geological mapping and sampling, relogging | |
| Agency of | silver, arsenic, | and resampling of the Pacific Island Gold's | ||
| Japan (JICA) | antimony and | trenches, diamond drill holes with X-ray | ||
| mercury | fluorescence (XRF) analysis, XRD analysis | |||
| and fluid homogenisation temperature. | ||||
| 2012-2014 | SPL 1493 | Geopacific | Epithermal gold | Regional ZTEM survey and stream sediment |
| Resources | sampling campaigns, with minor rock chip | |||
| Limited | sampling. |
Source: SRK compilation of historical reports
SRK CONSULTING (AUSTRALASIA) PTY LTD ■ 27 MAY 2024 ■ SJ, CD, MD/JM
52
Independent Specialist Report on the Mineral Assets of Alice Queen Limited Project Setting - Fiji ■ Final
4.5 Exploration activities
In 2021, the Nabila (SPL 1514) and Viani (SPL 1513) projects were granted to Viti Mining Pte Ltd (Viti Mining), which is a subsidiary of Alice Queen Limited.
In 2022, Sabeto (SPL 1518) was acquired by Viti Mining and currently remains the only granted exploration licence held by Alice Queen (SPL 1514 and SPL 1513 are both under renewal). Previous exploration activities completed by Alice Queen within the tenements are summarised in Table 4.5.
Table 4.5: Alice Queen's exploration activities by tenement - Fiji
| Year | Project (tenement) |
Tenement | Activities completed |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | Nabila, Viani | SPL 1514, | Desktop review including assessment of the historical data, due |
| SPL 1513 | diligence on existing reports and QA/QC on previous assay | ||
| results forming a more consistent internal database. | |||
| Nabila, Viani | SPL1514, | Desktop review interpretation of a large epithermal system based | |
| SPL 1513 | on assessment of previous geological mapping lithologies. Field | ||
| program at the Dakuniba prospect with samples dispatched for | |||
| 2022 | assay, reconnaissance and surface rock sampling program over the main gold-in-soil anomaly (64 rock samples - float, rock chips |
||
| and channel). | |||
| Geological features and historical grid check. 3D modelling for the | |||
| Faddy's prospect. | |||
| 2022 | Sabeto | SPL 1518 | Field mapping and sampling program, including sample dispatch |
| for assay analysis. | |||
| 2023 | Viani | SPL 1513 | Reconnaissance sampling program, intensive trenching and rock |
| sampling followed by drill testing planning. | |||
| 2023 | Sabeto | SPL 1518 | Assay results and data treatment, interpretation of a potential |
| porphyry system. | |||
| 2023 | Sabeto | SPL 1518 | Preliminary reconnaissance field program, mapping of |
| mineralised vein zones defined in the White Ridge and Gate | |||
| areas. | |||
| 2024 | Sabeto | SPL 1518 | Field observations and desktop review, interpretation of a |
| diatreme breccia outcropping over ~100 m. |
Source: SRK
4.6 Mineral Resources
There are no Mineral Resources currently reported for Alice Queen's Fiji tenements.
4. 7 Exploration targets and prospectivity
4.7.1 Nabila project (SPL 1514)
Previous exploration at the Nabila project has focused on a zone extending ~2-km to the northeast from the historical Mistry Mine (Figure 4.4), where historical records suggest small-scale mining efforts occurred from ~1935 producing ~1, 720 t, including 23.3 kg of Au, 6.4 kg of Ag and 20.3 t Pb (Allen and Horton, 1991 ).
SRK CONSULTING (AUSTRALASIA) PTY LTD ■ 27 MAY 2024 ■ SJ, CD, MD/JM
53
Independent Specialist Report on the Mineral Assets of Alice Queen Limited Project Setting - Fiji ■ Final
Figure 4.4: Historical Mistry Mine and Faddy's prospect - Nabila project area
==> picture [421 x 375] intentionally omitted <==
----- Start of picture text -----
VHI LEVU
0
0
0 0
0
0
0 0
8 0 VITI 0
0 LE-VU
8024ooomN MISTRY MINE �o
0
Hl1torlcal Producbao
1•ea.Au
0
c=:J Alica Oue9"1 Teneme-nl
/ MaJorRoad
O H,storlc Urll hotes
529ooo. ;S31oo mE
----- End of picture text -----
Source: Alice Queen Limited, ASX announcement dated 10 March 2021
SRK CONSULTING (AUSTRALASIA) PTY LTD • 27 MAY 2024 • SJ, CD, MD/JM
54
Independent Specialist Report on the Mineral Assets of Alice Queen Limited Project Setting - Fiji • Final
Figure 4.5: Detailed geological map of Faddy's prospect showing geochemically anomalous gold zones and drilling locations
==> picture [594 x 373] intentionally omitted <==
----- Start of picture text -----
ColdAIIClmalouilZo11ts
... >O.Sg/lAu
.. ... >O 1gll"Au >Q.05gltA.u
l"'-PrwtlveCeoiogy
o,
Ou:insniuy all1Mum
• A Trae!',)to ffl)?lr.a
" B ' _Q i'FRC69
• �hyt9,rt'ly.ili:IJDolerr,.
-�lefeoloabtlro
LICM'.c.J VOL�,uc, !NTRUSIVECOt-.:Pl.EX .�• + ++"t'-i . C 0ra."litef5)'ellrte
(LATE MIOCENE) • �rld en,ntl.:,1ee1'WClcanbane1 11f'OcLU,:i�
01 Ulldi!loo.nt:!I« trach�c Dnd lr.ldt,Q�C wlam1a,l'ld OYl"DC�� -�
•01' CoCtH an� coukSclr :raehplldcKl:ic apglomerat-11 �!
. "' °'' S..1:t::cot>blo1ndb0-,ldWl;1.Jbr'Mf10 Undi!l' l!nlialed b'Khp.ndlniLc ta bJIAlticwb�11nd � :.•MIJlciH:5Vll)'ln;tromD2.011,01b ++r++ [, ] I
WAINAMA!.AOROUP (?EOCENETO MIO lENl [CCEN!:;] J • """" Ul'ldi!lororiei:uo<: icbcll andv:IC31 Coonvod5ed!ment ® )-Z. � i f FROJ1 4-+ + . +, + ++ + ++ + I ,
� ""-' + + + + +
OOG1o:1nousZcno 0 i , '!i i- + ++ + +
/ � +-+ + +
lfR9!:lJ,> [--] T +
// / <ii�l1 +++
(!)fRC70 / / + [++][.] ++ [+ ]
,. + + +
/ ,,.1 ,, __ ,,,, ,, • '/ ,/' ✓ ++ +++ + ++++++++++ + + + ++++ [+] ++++++p•&�+-1+ +++ I
o, _ [+] + + + + + [�] +
,, ,, �;H<C10/ ++++�-+ +.+ ++ ++ +,+�� [+] ...?·+ [·]
'f 'f'
+:+ [+ ]
+ +
+ + +
... +
,- [±+] ± +I
Source: Levrel and Sims, 2021
.-+ + + + +
-+ + + + +
/ 0//
£++++!
----- End of picture text -----
SRK CONSUL TING (AUSTRALASIA) PTY LTD ■ 27 MAY 2024 ■ SJ, CD, MD/JM
55
Independent Specialist Report on the Mineral Assets of Alice Queen Limited Project Setting - Fiji • Final
Initial drilling at Mistry mine intersected short intervals of gold (Eskrom, 1975). A very small and circular radiometrics potassium-anomaly related to a subtle magnetic geophysical high (AusAid survey, 1997; 1998) was interpreted as a potential porphyry target related to the Mistry mine. Geochemical analysis indicates favourable anomalies following the regional northeast-southwest trend.
Faddy's prospect: Faddy's, previously referred to as the Kurokoula prospect, is an epithermal gold prospect located 2.5 km to the northeast of the Mistry mine (Alice Queen Limited, ASX announcement, 10 March 2021). Str.eam sediments and soil geochemical sampling results outline elevated concentrations of gold and base metals (silver, copper, lead and zinc) near the Faddy's prospect (Millenium Mining, 1999). Geochemical assays of trenches also define Faddy's as a zone of exploration interest. Most rock chip geochemical samples from outcrops along the Mistry Faddy's corridor returned values below <0.8 g/t Au (Figure 4.5).
Geopacific Resources Limited (Geopacific) reported that between Faddy's and the Mistry mine, several occurrences of pyrite, base metal sulfides and gold-bearing veins were recognised along breccia and shear zones dipping between 45[° ] and 70[° ] to the northwest (Millenium Mining, 1999; 2002). Additionally, drilling over the target outline has intercepted subvertical hydrothermal breccias and fracture stockworks near steeply dipping dykes. Alteration is intense and pervasive near the main breccia lode, and it's mainly composed of quartz-illite and sericite-chlorite +/- pyrite. Silicification occurs in breccia fragments and matrix (Price, 1999; Rose, 2001 ). Some of the most recent and relevant mineralisation intercepts obtained during drilling campaigns are:
-
Trenches: FT1 (54 m at 1.26 g/t Au, including 1 m at 66 g/t Au), FT2 (28 m at 9.71 g/t Au, including 1 m at 233 g/t Au (Geopacific Resources Limited, ASX announcement, 21 January 2009)
-
Road cuts: RCA (1 m at 19.4 g/t Au) and RCB (2 m at 37.5 g/t Au; (Geopacific Resources Limited, Annual Report, 2009)
-
Diamond drill holes: FAD001 (20.5 m at 4.27 g/t Au, from 73 m including 0.5 m at 73.2 g/t; FAD019 (2 m at 90 g/t Au, from 12 m including 0.5 m at 138 g/t) and FAD040 (11 m at 4.24 g/t Au, from 156 m including 1 m at 13.0 g/t Au; Geopacific Resources Limited, ASX announcement, 27 November 2008).
Figure 4.6: Petrographic analysis from samples obtained from trench FT2 (left) and drill hole FAD001 (right)
==> picture [173 x 131] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [175 x 132] intentionally omitted <==
Source: Pontifex & Associates, 2009
Notes: FT2: oxidised gold/silver/zinc gossan with interstitial network of gold within a vein-quartz-mosaic; FAD001: mineralised carbonate-quartz thrust zone beneath the gossan with pyrite, galena, sphalerite, and a grain composed of gold galena.
SRK CONSULTING (AUSTRALASIA) PTY LTD • 27 MAY 2024 ■ SJ, CD, MD/JM
56
Independent Specialist Report on the Mineral Assets of Alice Queen Limited Project Setting - Fiji ■ Final
4. 7 .2 Sabeto project (SPL 1518)
The Sabeto project, occurs between the neighbouring Vuda (Ding Jing Pte Ltd) and Tuvatu (Lion One Metals Ltd) projects. These projects are not currently held by Alice Queen but are interpreted as part of an interconnected epithermal-porphyry system related to shoshonitic rocks, with the highly altered epithermal level at Vuda and Tuvatu, and the copper-gold porphyry at Sabeto (Figure 4.7) (Geopacific Resources Limited, Annual Report, 2012). Several deep (up to 642 m) diamond drill holes in the Sabeto tenement intersected porphyry-style gold-copper mineralisation (SBD001, 32 m wide at 0.24 g/t Au and 0.12% Cu from 90 m) (Figure 4.8).
Figure 4.7: Schematic mineral systems interpretation - Sabeto project area
==> picture [416 x 273] intentionally omitted <==
----- Start of picture text -----
SABEtO INTERPRETED SECTION
Carbonate All & BaUMetal Increasing Alleration lnlensily Porphyry Related
Mlnerallsatlon
Area or get"><;liem)cal nnomallsm
In slrear s and soils.
r::, '\,
�Q ,-- -------,
�� Sporadic Catbonate
Au • Base Metal
1 [11]
Mineralisation
1 I
I
I I Mineralised Porphyry
I I I / I L.::. --, 32m Inc. 2m @ 0.24g/t Au @ 1.49gll Au & 0.5% Cu & 0.12% Cu
I I' J \ I
I / I \
I lg
PORPHYRY MODEL I I ["' ]
,: I
I
' I
l� � 1 I I I \ _ . _____ ..... LEGEND
',-I lj r,f [g][1 ] l I Pc,«. [11,tc ] #I I [I ] D D Nawalnlu Monzonlte Minorallslng Porphyry? Syenlte Porphyry
� 'i 11 Altafaflbn?\ D Sabeto Volcanics
Il,t t I I "' I Nadl Group Sediments
l_g I I \ 1, \ 100'melrea
---""'"""����-"""-.;,;,;a...---l►►Au-Cu Mln;rallsallon
----- End of picture text -----
Source: Geopacific
Based on the most recent assay results obtained for rock chip, float and channel geochemical samples, Alice Queen outlined three prospective zones ~300 m apart within the Sabeto project area (Figure 4.8), namely: a) White Ridge; b) Tawaravi and c) Gate (Alice Queen Limited, ASX announcement, 5 April 2023).
SRK CONSULTING (AUSTRALASIA) PTY LTD ■ 27 MAY 2024 ■ SJ, CD, MD/JM
57
Independent Specialist Report on the Mineral Assets of Alice Queen Limited Project Selling - Fiji ■ Final
Figure 4.8: Targets outlined by Alice Queen based on assay results from samples collected in the Sabeto project area
==> picture [411 x 233] intentionally omitted <==
----- Start of picture text -----
♦ Diamond Drill Hole
250m --I [Drill Trace ]
D Trench Collar
Projc lion: MGA Zono 60S (WGS84) . Diatreme Breccla Outcrop
--�· Sabeto Mini-Caldera
C:) Outline
/ [Major Drainage ]
Minor Drainage
Tracks
;; Rock Chip Samples (ppm Au)
A >SppmAu
• 1-SppmAu
0.5 - lppm Au
• 0.3 - 0.Sppm Au
• < 0.3ppm Au
8043ooom
----- End of picture text -----
| 554853 | 8042771 | 5.61 | 0.64 | 80.7 | 540 | 446 | 7.55 | 2.05 | 379 | 4.91 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 555322 | 8042606 | 4,61P | 4,0 | 4.40 | 640.0 | 1580 | 6,980 | '2.150 | 38,0 | 8.56 | |
| 555112 | 8043035 | 3.41 | 1.01 | 48.5 | 630 | 967 | 3.6 | 3.6 | 966 | 5.92 | |
| 555323 | 8042593 | 2.690 | 4.080 | 2.50 | 410.0 | 3550\• | 18.100 | �.oio | 45.0 | 7.47 | |
| --500094 | 55500 | 8042996 | 1.165 | 0.15 | 16 | 150 | 228 | 1.69 | 0.61 | 38 | 5.33 |
| --500269 | 554818 | 8042694 | 0.681 | 3 | 67.8 | 270 | 249 | 5.5 | 3:35 | 316 | 4.05 |
| 00193 | 554843 | 8042793 | 0.448 | 0.25 | 28.1 | 820 | 232 | 18.95 | 3. 16 | 211 | 7.05 |
| :r00313 | 555524 | 8042614 | 0.277 | 0.3 | 8.2 | 40 | 134.5 | 6.02 | 3:99 | 87 | 5.33 |
| 500220 | 555308 | 8042991 | 0.252 | 0.21 | 21.8 | 640 | 277 | 2.42 | 0.97 | 494 | 6.37 |
| Source: Alice | Queen Limited, | ASX announcement, 5 April 2023 |
SRK CONSUL TING (AUSTRALASIA) PTY LTD ■ 27 MAY 2024 ■ SJ, CD, MD/JM
58
Independent Specialist Report on the Mineral Assets of Alice Queen Limited Project Setting - Fiji ■ Final
White Ridge prospect: Alice Queen's surface rock chip geochemical sampling of narrow, steeply dipping mineralised quartz veins over 30 cm, proximal to the mapped diatreme breccia (Figure 4.9, Figure 4.10), returned the highest gold values in the Sabeto area, with 24.9 g/t Au in sample 500131. In sample 500132, located 13.5 m to the NW, the veins returned 3.41 g/t Au and 3.6 g/t Te (Alice Queen Limited, ASX announcement, 26 February 2024). These results are consistent with previous maximum values obtained for the Emperor Gold Mine's trench (5.11 g/t Au) and rock sample (60 g/t Au and 15 g/t Au), and Geopacific's diamond drill hole (SBDD0002). These results have previously been interpreted to be part of a porphyry system (Geopacific Resources Limited, Annual Report, 2012).
Tawaravi and Gate prospects: several sulfide/quartz veins and quartz stockwork have been mapped near both the Tawaravi and Gate prospects. Assay results for the Tawaravi target samples collected from a subvertical vein with malachite, chalcopyrite, bornite and covellite, returned 4.64 g/t Au and 1.58% Cu (500033) and 2.69 g/t Au and 3.55% Cu (500029). SBDD001 and SBDD003, also returned anomalous gold-copper results (Figure 4.8), related to highly evolved sanidine feldspar porphyry dykes (Geopacific Resources Limited, Annual Report, 2012 and 1 February 2013).
Figure 4.9: Breccia with disseminated sulfides, sanidine feldspar porphyry boulders and samples/outcrops with visible copper, malachite, covellite and chalcopyrite
==> picture [422 x 309] intentionally omitted <==
Source: Alice Queen Limited, date
SRK CONSULTING (AUSTRALASIA) PTY LTD ■ 27 MAY 2024 ■ SJ, CD, MD/JM
Independent Specialist Report on the Mineral Assets of Alice Queen Limited Project Setting - Fiji ■ Final
Figure 4.10: Polymictic diatreme breccia with angular clasts, matrix supported, with mineralised veining cutting
==> picture [421 x 319] intentionally omitted <==
Source: Alice Queen Limited, date
4.7.3 Viani project (SPL 1513)
Previous explorers proposed a low sulfidation epithermal system within the Viani project limits, at the Dakuniba prospect. This area is correlated with a discrete magnetic geophysical anomaly (Pathfinder Exploration Pty Ltd, 2010), extensive surface anomalies and mineralisation intersects in several shallow drill holes along 700 m strike. In the eastern part of the tenement, stream sediment geochemical anomalies (Au and minor Ag, Cu, Ba) define a ~1 km[2 ] zone called the Crossroad Prospect (Alice Queen Limited, ASX announcement, 17 November 2022).
Daku niba prospect: Surface rock and soil geochemical sampling (Figure 4.11) indicated a ~4 km gold anomaly at which correlates with epithermal veining (Alice Queen Limited, ASX announcement, 17 November 2022).
SRK CONSULTING (AUSTRALASIA) PTY LTD ■ 27 MAY 2024 ■ SJ, CD, MD/JM
60
Independent Specialist Report on the Mineral Assets of Alice Queen Limited Project Setting - Fiji ■ Final
Figure 4.11: JICA sampling, and gold and arsenic anomalies contoured in the Viani project area
==> picture [413 x 413] intentionally omitted <==
----- Start of picture text -----
SPL 1513
JICA/MMAJ Collars
Rock Chip > 1 gll Au
----- End of picture text -----
Source: Alice Queen Limited, date
Mineralisation is hosted by the Dakuniba basalt and tuffs and volcaniclastics of the Natewa Volcanic Group. Gold mineralisation is typically found in altered subvertical quartz veins. Epithermal boiling textures such as colloform and crustiform banding were recognised in outcrops and core sampling, supporting the interpretation of an epithermal mineral system. The most relevant exploration results reported by the Japan International Cooperation Agency (JICA) for this project area are: a) drill result including 2.2 m at 11.3 g/t Au from 121.45 m downhole depth, with 0.6 m at 27.6 g/t Au from 122.75 m (drill hole MJFV-5); b) trench samplings including 5 m at 4.27 g/t Au and 104.3 g/t Ag (Trench #29), 3.7 m at 4.9 g/t Au and 15.2 g/t Ag (Trench #32) and 8 m at 1.89 g/t Au and 6.25 g/t Ag (Trench #27) (Alice Queen Limited, ASX announcement, 6 March 2023). Alice Queen's fieldwork in 2022 identified outcropping hydrothermal alteration zones and epithermal veins with assay results of 4.6 g/t Au. In the Dakuniba prospect, 10% of samples returned positive gold (>1 ppm), while several samples returned mineralised gold assays >100 ppb and silver results >1 ppm (Levrel, 2021 ).
61
SRK CONSULTING (AUSTRALASIA) PTY LTD ■ 27 MAY 2024 ■ SJ, CD, MD/JM
Independent Specialist Report on the Mineral Assets of Alice Queen Limited Project Setting - Fiji ■ Final
Figure 4.12: Assay results for stream sediments in the Viani project targets
==> picture [412 x 291] intentionally omitted <==
----- Start of picture text -----
780000 785000 790000 795000 800000 805000 810000
§
Ii!
iil
Crossroads Pros
-Roads
• JICA Drill Collars
Gold (Au) In Stream Sediments
o 0·1 ppb
-! o 1·2.5 ppb
o 2,5·5 ppb
• 5·10 ppb 0 2500 50 m , rl!J. ALICE QUEEN
e 10·50 ppb -- = 1:120000 � LIMITED
e >50 ppb WGS8'1 UTM60S
780000 785000 790000 795000 800000 805000 810000
----- End of picture text -----
Source: Alice Queen Limited, 2021
Nakasaiki Creek area: To the west of and outside of the SPL 1513 tenement, Alice Queen recently recognised a quartz vein referred as Chris Reef (Figure 4.13) with sample 500125 returning 0. 707 g/t Au, 43 g/t Ag, 1,605 ppm As, 4,750 ppm Ba, 13 ppm Mo and 28.5 ppm Sb. Further to the east and within the current tenure, samples 500111 and 500112 returned gold values of 1.2-4.6 ppm (Figure 4.14), near the trenches containing gold-silver anomalies (Figure 4.14) in samples with quartz banding and vuggy silica overprint and abundant sulphides (Alice Queen Limited, ASX announcement, 6 March 2023). Previous JICA drilling performed in 1997 returned multiple epithermal gold intersections at shallow depths.
Figure 4.13: Sample 500125 from Chris Reef displaying vuggy silica texture
==> picture [208 x 142] intentionally omitted <==
Source: Alice Queen Limited, ASX announcement, 6 March 2023
SRK CONSULTING (AUSTRALASIA) PTY LTD ■ 27 MAY 2024 ■ SJ, CD, MD/JM
62
Independent Specialist Report on the Mineral Assets of Alice Queen Limited Project Setting - Fiji ■ Final
Figure 4.14: Sample location and best gold and silver assay values from rock chip sampling
==> picture [421 x 363] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [290 x 129] intentionally omitted <==
----- Start of picture text -----
Sample Auppm Agppm Type Easting Northing
500007 [1 ] 4,610 8.910 Float 802855,6 8147725.7
500021 4.130 Float 802724,4 8147916.1
500048 3.360 5.320 Float 802550.5 8148059.1
500036 1.900 22.900 Outcrop 803148,3 8147873.5
500049 1.485 3-470 Float 802465.3 8148137,5
500010 1.430 13,100 Float 802602.7 8148028
500112 1.260 6.520 Subcrop 802491.7 8148112
3,530
----- End of picture text -----
Source: Alice Queen Limited, ASX announcement, 6 March 2023
4.8 SRK's opinion
Exploration across the Nabila area is supported by a relatively large amount of historical data, including 3D modelling (Figure 4.15) and a provisional volume calculation that does not meet current JORC Code reporting requirements.
SRK CONSUL TING (AUSTRALASIA) PTY LTD ■ 27 MAY 2024 ■ SJ, CD, MD/JM
63
Independent Specialist Report on the Mineral Assets of Alice Queen Limited Project Setting - Fiji ■ Final
SRK notes that the exploration activities undertaken by Alice Queen were previously focused near the Faddy's prospect, with minor work towards the 2 km long corridor along the historical Mistry mine trend. Available records indicate these former mining operations ceased due to a landslide and loss of machinery. Ground stability remains a potential risk for the project.
While records exist for an interim Mineral Resource estimate, the required details have not been reviewed in sufficient detail by a Competent Person and have not been reported in accordance with the guidelines of the JORC Code 2012. Along with the associated metallurgical testwork on material from the Faddy's prospect, this volume therefore cannot be reported or referenced. SRK notes that there are possible issues related to the ore extraction in the Faddy's target area, due to the proximity of the mineralisation to the coastline, limitations in economic aspects related to deposit size, lack of exploration work near the Mistry mine and/or further south, and the expansion of local villages within tenement limits.
The Sabeto project is the Company's only granted tenement in Fiji and exploration activities are underway, albeit at an earlier exploration stage than the other areas. Data and information from prospects/deposits in adjacent tenures (e.g. Vuda prospect and Tuvatu gold deposit) provide a guide for ongoing exploration activities targeting epithermal and porphyry mineralisation styles. The interpretation of features correlated to a copper-gold porphyry system and the definition of three targets are supported by geological evidence obtained during the last exploration campaigns. SRK recommends further drilling, geochemical sampling and detailed geological/prospectivity analysis be undertaken in the Sabeto project area.
Previous exploration activities in the Viani project include geophysics, surface geophysical sampling, trenching, drilling and assay. Alice Queen has initiated new sampling and geological mapping campaigns, obtaining relevant evidence for the assessment of an epithermal mineral system such as the occurrence of vuggy silica and geochemistry (Au, Ag, As, Ba, Mo and Sn) anomalies, further supporting the exploration model in use for the project area.
The geological context and mineral system related to the Viani project area might be less complex than for projects on Viti Levu (Nabila and Sabeto), but the nature of the historical datasets (i.e. positioning issues, limited assay elements) and scarcity of drill hole data requires more geological work to be undertaken.
SRK CONSUL TING (AUSTRALASIA) PTY LTD ■ 27 MAY 2024 ■ SJ, CD, MD/JM
64
Independent Specialist Report on the Mineral Assets of Alice Queen Limited Project Setting - Fiji ■ Final
Figure 4.15: 3D modelling and JORC Code 2012 compliant Mineral Resource estimate for the Faddy's prospect, including: a) diamond drilling dataset and assay results; and b) mineralisation domain block model with blocks >0.5 g/t Au shown
==> picture [422 x 415] intentionally omitted <==
----- Start of picture text -----
Auppm
'
,.,
o.s .I
1
... ,
Pluog� -01
Azimuth 157
-Nort� section +8024952 I .22--- -- -- ---1--- 50 100 150
Au_OK
2
1.5
0.5
I
i
I I Plunge +01
-I -------I -- - - --•--- -- Azimuth 142 0 25 50 75
----- End of picture text -----
Source: Alice Queen, date Notes: View for both sections is southeast.
65
SRK CONSULTING (AUSTRALASIA) PTY LTD ■ 27 MAY 2024 ■ SJ, CD, MD/JM
Independent Specialist Report on the Mineral Assets of Alice Queen Limited Part C: Valuation ■ Final
Part C: Valuation
SRK CONSULTING (AUSTRALASIA) PTY LTD ■ 27 MAY 2024 ■ SJ, CD, MD/JM
66
Independent Specialist Report on the Mineral Assets of Alice Queen Limited Other Considerations • Final
5 Other Considerations
5.1 Gold price
In support of this valuation exercise, SRK has carried out a limited analysis of the recent gold market. This analysis reflects the prevailing conditions as at April 2024 and is considered reasonable to support the opinions and conclusions presented in this Report.
Unlike other commodities whose fundamentals are driven by demand, gold is not used up or consumed like other industrial metals and thus most of the gold produced historically remains available for use. It can be argued that gold is produced regardless of demand, as it is regarded by many as a store of wealth. Because of this, the supply and demand argument that can be made for other metal commodities in general, does not hold well for gold.
The gold available 'above ground' remains liquid. While total annual demand for gold is around 4,000-4,500 t, approximately two-thirds of annual gold demand is destined for the jewellery market. In many countries, jewellery represents liquid wealth. Gold used for personal adornment often makes its way back into circulation after several years or a few generations. A small amount of gold (approximately 330 t) each year is destined for medical and industrial applications and the remainder held in investments and exchange-traded funds (ETFs).
A recent study by the World Gold Council of the short-term drivers of the gold price noted that these can be broadly grouped into the following four categories:
-
Economic expansion
-
Risk and uncertainty
-
Opportunity cost
-
Momentum of return of gold, ETF flows and COM EX futures positioning.
In 2022, the gold price increased following Russia's invasion of Ukraine. In December 2023, gold rose further to above US$2,000/oz following the onset of conflict in the Middle East with risk and uncertainty remaining a key driver of the gold price (Figure 5.1).
The Australian Government's Department of Industry, Science, Energy and Resources (DISER) most recent Quarterly report (December 2023) noted that price support for gold has come from ongoing strength in central bank purchasing, economic uncertainty and geopolitical risk.
67
SRK CONSULTING (AUSTRALASIA) PTY LTD • 27 MAY 2024 • SJ, CD, MD/JM
Independent Specialist Report on the Mineral Assets of Alice Queen Limited Other Considerations ■ Final
Figure 5.1: Gold price
==> picture [411 x 224] intentionally omitted <==
----- Start of picture text -----
3,500
3,000
2,500
2,000
1.5D0
1,000
500
..c g� � I() C, i!: -� j; ·.� � r� � 'i' i:: ,'l!_ ..c 9 CD � C, Q'.l en � C, i!: .'I!. � .D B � M � r1 i!: if � .t> � c'5 t. C'l .-, � [i!:] � � .D [�\ ] � Ill � .-, i!: (9 if .-, .t> � 0 t. r--.-, � i!: � of! .D � g en .-, � i!: .D � .'I!. � � � rl � �I lL .0 UJ �f � t1 <� � � �\ ,f
-Price USSJoz. - Price ASloz
----- End of picture text -----
Source: World Bank, Gold (UK), 99.5% fine, London afternoon fixing, average of daily rates
DISER notes that the gold prices have continued to hold up well despite downward pressure from various sources such as high real yields, a strong US dollar and continued ETF outflows. Official sector buying is expected to continue at strong levels over 2024 and some degree of geopolitical risk premium is expected to persist. Thereafter, the gold price is then expected to fall, due to pressure from high real interest rates (as global inflation eases) and a gradual easing of safe-haven demand.
For the purpose of its valuation, SRK has elected to adopt the average Australian dollar gold price of A$3,291/oz for March 2024 to inform its market analysis as presented in the valuation section of the Report.
5.2 Copper price
In addition, SRK has also carried out a limited analysis of the copper market for valuation purposes. This analysis reflects the prevailing conditions as at April 2024 and is considered reasonable to support the opinions and conclusions presented in this Report.
SRK's high-level analysis is summarised as follows:
-
Despite significant growth in copper consumption in China, copper prices trended down throughout 2023 and into early 2024 before recovering in March 2024 to a current high not seen since May 2022.
-
The general fall in copper prices (2023-2024) was driven by weakness in construction and manufacturing in advanced economies including US, EU and Japan.
-
The benchmark London Metals Exchange (LME) copper price is estimated to average US$8,340/t in 2024 but is expected to rally and reach US$9,200/t by 2029 (real terms).
SRK CONSULTING (AUSTRALASIA) PTY LTD ■ 27 MAY 2024 ■ SJ, CD, MD/JM
68
Independent Specialist Report on the Mineral Assets of Alice Queen Limited Other Considerations • Final
-
Global mined and refined copper production are expected to grow by 2.4% and 2.0% in 2024, respectively. This growth is expected to be driven by a combination of new greenfield projects, a rise in production capacity, and increasing automation of certain production processes.
-
Australian copper export earnings are forecast to reach A$12.1 billion in 2023-2024. Higher export volumes and rising prices are expected to see real export earnings reach A$16.8 billion in 2028-2029.
Figure 5.2: Copper price
==> picture [351 x 251] intentionally omitted <==
----- Start of picture text -----
16,0 .00
14,0 .00
12,0 .00
10,0 .00
QJ
C:
BC: s,000.00
6,000.00
4,000.00
2,000.00
0.00
.,., '7 � C: .,., '7 � C: .,., '7 z > 0 u:, 1 (1) "' 1 0 u 0'1 ... ::E � 0'1 ... 0 8 (1) Cl' ('() 0 ti 1 ,q ::E
-Copper (A$/ t) --Copper (US$/t)
----- End of picture text -----
Source: World Bank, commodity price
For the purpose of its valuation, SRK has elected to adopt the average Australian dollar copper price of A$13,253/t for March 2024 to inform its market analysis as presented in the valuation section of the Report.
5.3 Previous transactions
5.3.1 Acquisition of Viti Mining Limited Pte (10 March 2021)
In March 2021, Alice Queen entered an agreement to acquire a 100% interest in the Fiji domiciled exploration company, Viti Pte Mining Limited (Viti Mining) for the equivalent of A$10,000 in Alice Queen shares. At the time of this transaction, Viti Mining's assets comprised two mineral tenures: SPL 1514 (Nabila) and SPL 1513 (Viani).
Based on a combined area of 235 km [2 ] for both tenures, this corporate-level transaction (excluding any cash or cash equivalent assets) implies an area-based multiple of A$42.55/km [2 ] on a raw basis and A$53.44/km [2 ] on a normalised basis.
SRK CONSULTING (AUSTRALASIA) PTY LTD ■ 27 MAY 2024 ■ SJ, CD, MD/JM
69
Independent Specialist Report on the Mineral Assets of Alice Queen Limited Other Considerations • Final
5.3.2 Acquisition of Sabeto by Viti Mining Limited Pte (2022)
In 2022, Viti Mining acquired Sabeto (SPL 1518). However, the terms of this transaction have not been publicly disclosed and SRK is therefore unable to determine a deal multiple.
5.3.3 Proposed farm-in by Newcrest on Mendooran (30 September 2017)
In September 2017, Newcrest Operations Limited and Alice Queen entered into an heads-of agreement (HOA) on the Alice Queen's Mendooran project. Under the terms of the subsequent option and farm-in agreement, Newcrest had the right to earn up to an 80% interest in the Mendooran project by incurring exploration expenditure of not less than A$10 million, with a minimum expenditure requirement of A$1 million.
In November 2018 and having met the minimum expenditure requirement under the option and farm-in agreement, Newcrest elected not to proceed with the farm-in and joint venture at the Mendooran project.
As a failed transaction, SRK does not consider this to be a valid indication of market value of the Mendooran project.
5.3.4 Commercial in Confidence Offers for Alice Queen Assets
SRK has been notified of a number of commercial in confidence offers in which approaches have been made to Alice Queen directors for the potential acquisition of certain assets. None of these offers were binding, have subsequently been terminated and were not sufficiently advanced to be publicly disclosed.
SRK has reviewed the terms of these offers and considered them where appropriate in its valuation of Alice Queen.
5.4 Previous valuations
Having asked the relevant questions of Alice Queen and conducted a review of public documents, SRK is not aware of any previous Mineral Asset valuations undertaken on or for the projects held by Alice Queen.
70
SRK CONSULTING (AUSTRALASIA) PTY LTD • 27 MAY 2024 • SJ, CD, MD/JM
Independent Specialist Report on the Mineral Assets of Alice Queen Limited Valuation ■ Final
6 Valuation
The objective of this section is to provide PKF and the shareholders of Alice Queen with SRK's opinion regarding the valuation of the Mineral Assets of Alice Queen. SRK has not valued Alice Queen, this being the corporate entity that is the beneficial owner of the respective Mineral Assets.
SRK has relied on information provided by Alice Queen, as well as information sourced from the public domain, SRK's internal databases and SRK's subscription databases.
The VALMIN Code (2015) outlines three generally accepted valuation approaches:
-
1 . Market Approach
-
Income Approach
-
Cost Approach.
The Market Approach is based primarily on the principle of substitution and is also called the Sales Comparison Approach. The Mineral Asset being valued is compared with the transaction value of similar Mineral Assets under similar time and circumstance on an open market (VALMIN Code [2015]). Methods include comparable transactions, metal transaction ratio (MTR) and option or farm-in agreement terms analysis.
The Income Approach is based on the principle of anticipation of economic benefits and includes all methods that are based on the anticipated benefits of the potential income or cashflow generation of the Mineral Asset (VALMIN Code (2015)). Valuation methods that follow this approach include discounted cashflow (DCF) modelling, capitalised margin, option pricing and probabilistic methods.
The Cost Approach is based on the principle of cost contribution to value, with the costs incurred providing the basis of analysis (VALMIN Code (2015)). Methods include the appraised value method and multiples of exploration expenditure (MEE), where expenditures are analysed for their contribution to the exploration potential of the Mineral Asset.
The applicability of the various valuation approaches and methods varies depending on the stage of exploration or development of the Mineral Asset and hence the amount and quality of the information available on the mineral potential of the assets.
Table 6.1 presents the valuation approaches for the valuation of mineral properties at the various stages of exploration and development.
Table 6.1: Suggested valuation approaches according to development status
| Valuation | Exploration | Pre-Development | Development | Production |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Approach | Projects | Projects | Projects | Projects |
| Market | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Income | No | In some cases | Yes | Yes |
| Cost | Yes | In some cases | No | No |
Source: VALMIN Code (2015)
The market approach to valuation is able to be used for the valuation of Mineral Assets regardless of development status but is typically applied as a primary approach for Exploration to Development stage projects.
SRK CONSUL TING (AUSTRALASIA) PTY LTD ■ 27 MAY 2024 ■ SJ, CD, MD/JM
71
Independent Specialist Report on the Mineral Assets of Alice Queen Limited Valuation ■ Final
An income-based method, such as a DCF model is commonly adopted for assessing the value of a tenure containing a deposit where an Ore Reserve has been produced following appropriate level of technical studies and to accepted technical guidelines such as the JORC Code (2012). However, an income-based method is generally not considered appropriate for deposits that are less advanced or where technical risk is not quantified (i.e. no declared Ore Reserve and/or supporting mining and related technical studies).
The use of cost-based methods, such as considering suitable MEE is best suited to exploration projects, where Mineral Resources remain to be reliably estimated.
In general, these methods are accepted analytical valuation approaches that are in common use for determining the value of Mineral Assets. Given its direct reference to values paid in the market and ability to be actively observed, the market approach provides a direct link to Market Value. In contrast both income-based and cost-based methods derive a Technical Value (as defined below) which typically require the application of various adjustments to account for market considerations in order to convert these values to a Market Value.
The Market Value is defined in the VALMIN Code (2015) as, in respect of a Mineral Asset, the amount of money (or the cash equivalent of some other consideration) for which the Mineral Asset should change hands on the Valuation date between a willing buyer and a willing seller in an arm's length transaction after appropriate marketing wherein the parties each acted knowledgeably, prudently and without compulsion. The term Market Value has the same intended meaning and context as the International Valuation Standards Committee (IVSC) term of the same name. This has the same meaning as Fair Value in RG111. In the 2005 edition of the VALMIN Code, this was known as Fair Market Value.
The Technical Value is defined in the VALMIN Code (2015) as an assessment of a Mineral Asset's future net economic benefit at the Valuation Date under a set of assumptions deemed most appropriate by a Practitioner, excluding any premium or discount to account for market considerations. The term Technical Value has an intended meaning that is similar to the IVSC term Investment Value.
Under prevailing industry norms, regulatory guidance and as required by the VALMIN Code (2015), Practitioners are required to estimate Market Value. There is no requirement to report Technical Value, which is only generally estimated as a step to report Market Value.
Valuation methods are, in general, subsets of valuation approaches and for example the Income Approach comprises several methods. Furthermore, some methods can be considered to be primary methods for valuation while others are secondary methods or rules of thumb considered suitable only to benchmark valuations completed using primary methods.
Methods traditionally used to value exploration and development projects include:
-
MEE method (expenditure-based)
-
JV terms method (expenditure-based)
-
Geoscientific rating methods (e.g. Kilburn - area-based)
-
Comparable transactions method (market based)
-
MTR analysis (ratio of the transaction value to the gross dollar metal content, expressed as a percentage - market based)
SRK CONSUL TING (AUSTRALASIA) PTY LTD ■ 27 MAY 2024 ■ SJ, CD, MD/JM
72
Independent Specialist Report on the Mineral Assets of Alice Queen Limited Valuation • Final
-
Yardstick/rule-of-thumb method (e.g. cosUresource or production unit, percentage of an in situ value)
-
Geological risk method.
In summary, however, the various recognised valuation methods are designed to provide an estimate of the Mineral Asset or project value in each of the various categories of development. In some instances, a particular Mineral Asset or project may comprise assets which logically fall under more than one of the previously discussed development categories.
6.1 Valuation basis
SRK has considered the defined Ore Reserves, Mineral Resources, Exploration Targets as well as the areal extent and exploration potential of the granted tenure held by Alice Queen (Table 6.2).
Table 6.2: SRK's adopted valuation basis
| Project | Development Stage | Description | Valuation basis |
|---|---|---|---|
| Horn Island | Advanced | Mineral Resources | Market: Comparable transactions |
| Exploration/Scoping | Market: Yardstick factors | ||
| Queensland - | Early to Advanced | Exploration Potential | Market: Comparable transactions |
| Exploration Tenure | Exploration | Cost: Geoscientific rating | |
| New South Wales - | Early to Advanced | Exploration Potential | Market: Comparable transactions |
| Exploration Tenure | Exploration | Cost: Geoscientific rating | |
| Fiji - Exploration | Early to Advanced | Exploration Potential | Market: Comparable transactions |
| Tenure | Exploration | Cost: Geoscientific rating |
Source: SRK analysis
SRK notes that the VALMIN Code (2015) cautions in ascribing value to tenures under application. In considering these, SRK in its professional judgement has elected to apply a 20% discount to reflect uncertainty in the timing and likely conditions associated with grant.
6.2 SRK's valuation technique
In estimating the value of the projects as at the Valuation Date, SRK has considered various valuation methods within the context of the VALMIN Code (2015).
For valuation of defined Mineral Resources, SRK has elected to adopt a comparable transactions method as its primary valuation approach. The derived values determined using this method were then cross-checked against values determined using the industry yardstick method.
For the valuation of the exploration potential outside of the defined resource areas and the broader exploration tenure, SRK elected to adopt values implied by an area based (i.e. A$/km[2] ) comparable transactions method which have been cross-checked by values developed using a geoscientific rating approach.
SRK CONSULTING (AUSTRALASIA) PTY LTD ■ 27 MAY 2024 ■ SJ, CD, MD/JM
73
Independent Specialist Report on the Mineral Assets of Alice Queen Limited Valuation ■ Final
6.3 Valuation of Resources
6.3.1 Comparable transactions - resource multiples
For its evaluation of the gold ounces in the defined Mineral Resources as outlined in Section 2.6, SRK compiled gold resource transactions using its internal databases, as well as the S&P Capital IQ Pro subscription database. The raw data used for the Mineral Resource valuation are presented in Appendix A (Comparable transactions).
After compiling the relevant data, SRK reviewed transactions involving gold projects in Australia (at various development stages) that occurred between 2020 and 2024. SRK identified 42 transactions that it considered relevant and for which sufficient information was available to calculate a resource multiple.
The implied transaction multiple for resources was then expressed in A$/oz terms. This implied multiple was calculated using the transaction value (at the implied 100% acquisition cost) and the total contained Mineral Resources supporting the transaction. Given the gold price volatility and future price uncertainty, SRK elected to use the March 2024 average Australian dollar gold price of A$3,291/oz to normalise the implied multiples to the valuation date and inform its market analysis. SRK has used the A$/oz gold price as the proposed transaction involves Australian companies and projects. Therefore, it is considered most relevant in determining the price that potential acquirers would be willing to pay for the Mineral Assets held by Alice Queen.
Importantly, while transaction multiples are widely used in valuation, they rely on the assumption that the reported Mineral Resources have been appropriately reported and can be taken at face value. The method assumes that differences in reporting regimes, between different Competent Persons, Mineral Resource classification, metal recovery and adopted cut-off grades (which may change between assets and/or companies) do not materially influence the implied multiple. The method implicitly assumes total recoverability of all metal tonnes/ounces, as reliable and accurate data are generally not disclosed or available around the time of most transactions, or for all companies. Importantly, SRK's implied value calculations are for the purposes of its valuation and do not attempt to estimate or reflect the metal likely to be recovered as required under the JORC Code (2012).
SRK notes that there is a clear relationship between the development stage of the assets (Figure 6.2 and Figure 6.3) that host the defined Mineral Resources and their implied multiples with the average, median and weighted average values generally decreasing in line with earlier development stages. When considering the weighted average normalised multiples for projects in Australia only, SRK notes its analysis implies the following normalised transaction multiples (based on weighted averages as set out in Table 6.3):
-
projects in operation or construction -A$217.589/oz
-
projects in care and maintenance - A$65 .14/oz
-
projects at pre-development* stage -A$8.93/oz
-
projects at feasibility* stage -A$98.65/oz
-
projects at scoping and pre-feasibility stage -A$62.37/oz
-
projects at advanced exploration stage - A$36.23/oz.
-
*only 2 transactions at that development stage.
SRK CONSULTING (AUSTRALASIA) PTY LTD ■ 27 MAY 2024 ■ SJ, CD, MD/JM
74
Independent Specialist Report on the Mineral Assets of Alice Queen Limited Valuation ■ Final
The value price curve identified by this metric is in alignment with prevailing theory on value through a mining[p] ro[j] ect's life c[y] cle[(] Figure 6.1 ).
Figure 6.1: Project value curve
==> picture [421 x 212] intentionally omitted <==
----- Start of picture text -----
Exploration
Euphoria
Technical Studies
and Pcrmlttln11
EMplorallon Ideas Flnandns,
und Generation Construction
TIME
•
----- End of picture text -----
Source: SRK
Table 6.3: Resource-based transaction multiple analysis - Australia
| Resource multiple - Raw | Resource multiple - Normalised | |
|---|---|---|
| (A$/oz) | (A$/oz) | |
| All projects | ||
| Count | 65 | 65 |
| Minimum | 1.30 | 1.64 |
| Median | 42.12 | 52.97 |
| Average | 68.82 | 88.79 |
| Maximum | 393.82 | 566.93 |
| Weighted average | 109.16 | 149.98 |
| Projects in operation or under construction | ||
| Count | 12 | 12 |
| Minimum | 23.18 | 31.77 |
| Median | 90.54 | 117.87 |
| Average | 127.80 | 170.54 |
| Maximum | 393.82 | 566.93 |
| Weighted average | 156.58 | 217.58 |
| Projects in care and maintenance | ||
| Count | 5 | 5 |
| Minimum | 15.01 | 19.74 |
| Median | 54.72 | 75.53 |
| Average | 62.34 | 79.64 |
| Maximum | 137.70 | 173.40 |
| Weighted average | 47.86 | 65.14 |
SRK CONSULTING (AUSTRALASIA) PTY LTD ■ 27 MAY 2024 ■ SJ, CD, MD/JM
75
Independent Specialist Report on the Mineral Assets of Alice Queen Limited Valuation ■ Final
| Resource multiple - Raw | Resource multiple - Normalised | |
|---|---|---|
| (A$/oz) | (A$/oz) | |
| Projects at pre-development stage | ||
| Count | 2 | 2 |
| Minimum | 6.03 | 7.45 |
| Median | 14.63 | 17.71 |
| Average | 14.63 | 17.71 |
| Maximum | 23.23 | 27.97 |
| Weighted average | 7.27 | 8.93 |
| Projects at feasibility stage | ||
| Count | 2 | 2 |
| Minimum | 76.27 | 91.84 |
| Median | 76.98 | 98.65 |
| Average | 76.98 | 98.65 |
| Maximum | 77.68 | 105.47 |
| Weighted average | 77.47 | 103.43 |
| Project at scoping/pre-feasibility stage | ||
| Count | 9 | 9 |
| Minimum | 4.34 | 5.37 |
| Median | 42.12 | 52.97 |
| Average | 63.70 | 77.06 |
| Maximum | 224.28 | 270.05 |
| Weighted average | 53.51 | 62.37 |
| Project at advanced exploration stage | ||
| Count | 35 | 35 |
| Minimum | 1.30 | 1.64 |
| Median | 29.01 | 35.26 |
| Average | 53.47 | 68.59 |
| Maximum | 312.76 | 429.55 |
| Weighted average | 29.04 | 36.23 |
Source: SRK analysis
Note: The weighted average is determined based on the contained gold ounces in the defined Mineral Resource, which SRK considers to be an appropriate metric in the evaluation of large dataset.
SRK CONSULTING (AUSTRALASIA) PTY LTD ■ 27 MAY 2024 ■ SJ, CD, MD/JM
76
Independent Specialist Report on the Mineral Assets of Alice Queen Limited Valuation • Final
Figure 6.2: Resource-based gold multiples - Australia
==> picture [387 x 225] intentionally omitted <==
----- Start of picture text -----
$700
$600
$500
0 -$400
<( $300
.!!?
z
...
$
-5.00 10.00 15.00 20.00
Grade Au (g/t)
•Operating/Construction •Feasibility Pre-Development Pre-Feas /Scoping Advanced Exploration i.>C&M
----- End of picture text -----
==> picture [68 x 7] intentionally omitted <==
----- Start of picture text -----
Source: SRK analysis
----- End of picture text -----
Note: Bubble size denotes total contained metal (gold ounces).
Figure 6.3: Resource-based gold multiples (focused on lower value multiples) - Australia
==> picture [384 x 254] intentionally omitted <==
----- Start of picture text -----
$150
$130
$110
<IJ u
C :::l
0
"O w-
.!!?
E
5
z
-2.00 $(10) 4.00 6.00 8.00 10.00
Grade Au (g/t)
•Operating/ Construction • Feasibility Pre-Development Pre-Fe as/ Scoping Advanced Exploration .., C&M
$(30)
----- End of picture text -----
==> picture [67 x 7] intentionally omitted <==
----- Start of picture text -----
Source: SRK analysis
----- End of picture text -----
Notes: Bubble size denotes total contained metal (gold ounces). Graph axis maximum values changed to show detail at low value lower grade (e.g. high values excluded).
SRK CONSULTING (AUSTRALASIA) PTY LTD ■ 27 MAY 2024 ■ SJ, CD, MD/JM
77
Independent Specialist Report on the Mineral Assets of Alice Queen Limited Valuation ■ Final
Based on its comparable transactions analysis, SRK considers the implied value of the Horn Island Mineral Resources lies in the range A$8.2 million to A$16.3 million, with a preferred valuation of A$12.3 million (Table 6.4). SRK's value multiples have been selected in consideration of the stranded nature of the asset, the lack of recent concerted exploration and likely limited pool of potential buyers for this type of asset.
Table 6.4: Comparable transactions valuation of Alice Queen's Mineral Resources
| Deposit/Project | Total | Value | Value | Value | Value | Value | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (oz) | multiple | multiple | multiple | Low | High | Preferred | |
| Low | High | Preferred | (A$ M) | (A$ M) | (A$ M) | ||
| (A$/oz) | (A$/oz) | (A$/oz) | |||||
| Horn Island | 524,000 | 10 | 20 | 15 | 8.2 | 16.3 | 12.3 |
| Total, 100% attributable | 524,000 | 10 | 20 | 15 | 8.2 | 16.3 | 12.3 |
| basis |
Source: SRK analysis
6.3.2 Industry yardstick cross-check
As a cross-check to the values implied by market multiples, SRK has also considered standard industry yardsticks. Under the yardstick method of valuation, specified percentages of the spot price are used to assess the likely value. Commonly used industry yardstick factors range between 0.5% and 5.0% of the prevailing spot price as set out below:
-
Measured Mineral Resources: 2.0% to 5.0% of the spot price
-
■ Indicated Mineral Resources: 1.0% to 2.0% of the spot price ■ Inferred Mineral Resources: 0.5% to 1.0% of the spot price ■ Exploration Target: 0.1% to 0.5% of the spot price.
To determine the relevant industry yardstick factors for use, SRK adopted the gold price of A$3,373.764/oz. On this basis, the implied value range multiples using the industry yardstick factors are summarised in Table 6.5.
Table 6.5: Industry yardstick factors value range
| Resource | Percentage of the | Value | Range |
|---|---|---|---|
| spot price | ----- Low |
High | |
| (A$/oz) | (A$/oz) | ||
| Measured | 2.0% to 5.0% | 67.48 | 168.69 |
| Indicated | 1.0% to 2.0% | 33.74 | 67.48 |
| Inferred | 0.5% to 1.0% | 16.87 | 33.74 |
| Target | 0.1% to 0.5% | 3.37 | 16.87 |
Source: SRK analysis
Mineral Resources - industry yardstick only
Table 6.6 summarises the industry yardstick values of the Mineral Resources of Horn Island on a 100% basis. Based on its derived industry yardstick factors, SRK considers the implied value of Mineral Resources of Alice Queen's Horn Island project lies in the range A$13.5 million to
SRK CONSULTING (AUSTRALASIA) PTY LTD ■ 27 MAY 2024 ■ SJ, CD, MD/JM
78
Independent Specialist Report on the Mineral Assets of Alice Queen Limited Valuation ■ Final
A$27.0 million, with a preferred valuation of A$20.3 million.
Table 6.6: Industry yardstick valuation of Alice Queen's Mineral Resources
| Deposit/Project | Total | Value Low | Value High | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| (oz) | (A$ M) | (A$ M) | Preferred | |
| (A$ M) | ||||
| Horn Island | 524,000 | 13.5 | 27.0 | 20.3 |
| Total Horn Island 100% basis | 524,000 | 13.5 | 27.0 | 20.3 |
Source: SRK analysis
6.3.3 Summary of Mineral Resources valuation
In estimating the value of the defined Mineral Resource areas, SRK has considered the values implied by comparable transactions analysis and industry yardstick methods.
In considering the overall value of the Mineral Assets, SRK has selected the comparative transactions as its preferred method noting the unique location of Horn Island is unlikely to be captured by industry yardstick metrics.
Selected values
Based on its analysis, SRK considers the implied value of the Horn Island Mineral Resources lies in the range A$8.2 million to A$16.3 million, with a preferred valuation of A$12.3 million on an 100% attributable basis (Table 6.7).
Table 6.7: SRK valuation summary - Resources
| Method | Low | High | Preferred |
|---|---|---|---|
| (A$ M) | (A$ M) | (A$ M) | |
| Comparable transactions | 8.17 | 16.34 | 12.26 |
| Yardstick | 13.51 | 27.02 | 20.27 |
| Selected* | 8.2 | 16.3 | 12.3 |
*rounded
6.4 Valuation of exploration potential
6.4.1 Comparable market transactions - area multiples
In addition to its assessment of the Mineral Resources on Horn Island, SRK has also considered the value associated with the mineral tenure surrounding the currently defined Mineral Resources at Horn Island, and Alice Queen's broader tenure package in Australia and Fiji.
SRK also reviewed transactions involving early to advanced stage gold and copper exploration projects in Australia and the Asia Pacific region (i.e. those without defined gold or copper Mineral Resources). For Australia, SRK has identified and compiled data and statistics for 112 transactions occurring between 2021 and 2024 (Table 6.8) for which sufficient information was available to calculate an area-based multiple (i.e. A$/km [2 ] or A$/ha). SRK's analysis of the implied multiples was based on the reported areal extent of mineral tenure.
SRK CONSULTING (AUSTRALASIA) PTY LTD ■ 27 MAY 2024 ■ SJ, CD, MD/JM
79
Independent Specialist Report on the Mineral Assets of Alice Queen Limited Valuation ■ Final
The raw data relied on for the valuation of the exploration potential are presented in Appendix A.
Given the gold price volatility and future price uncertainty, SRK elected to use the average Australian dollar gold price of A$3,291/oz, being the average spot gold price for March 2024, to normalise the implied multiples and inform its market analysis. SRK has used the Australian dollar gold price as the proposed transaction involves mostly Australian companies and projects. The Fijian assets are the only international assets. For consistency, SRK converted the implied multiples into Australian dollars.
SRK notes there is a clear relationship between the size of tenure acquired and the implied value (in A$/km [2 ] terms). In Western Australia, being the location of most of the transactions in SRK's dataset, this is reflected more clearly with mining leases (Mls) (and prospecting licences or Pls) which are generally smaller than exploration licences (Els) and are also generally more advanced in terms of the exploration completed. Consequently, Mls generally attract higher transaction prices and thus implied multiples. The relationship also holds true when these datasets are reviewed exclusively from each other (Figure 6.4 and Figure 6.5). SRK considers this to be reasonable and in line with industry practice because, as exploration on a tenure progresses, explorers will, in accordance with regulatory requirements, intermittently relinquish those areas of lower perceived potential and retain only those areas considered to be the most prospective.
For the Asia Pacific copper-gold and Australian copper datasets, SRK has also considered the tenure in terms of area (Figure 6.7) but notes that there are insufficient transactions involving Mls to provide meaningful analysis.
It should be noted that the inclusion of a net smelter return (NSR) royalty as part of a transaction's deal terms was particularly evident in those transactions in which mineralisation has been identified. As the value of an NSR is not reflected in SRK's treatment of the deal terms and therefore the transaction multiples, these transactions often have a lower multiple than might be expected.
Figure 6.4: Area-based gold multiples for ML and PL tenure types -Australia
==> picture [359 x 230] intentionally omitted <==
----- Start of picture text -----
10,000,000
1,000,000 - - -
100,000
10,000
"' 1,000
100
10
1
0.01 0.10 1.00 10.00 100.00 1,000.00 10,000.00
Area (km [2] )
• PL ML [-][ Log. (PL) ] - Log. (ML)
----- End of picture text -----
Source: SRK analysis
SRK CONSULTING (AUSTRALASIA) PTY LTD • 27 MAY 2024 • SJ, CD, MD/JM
80
Independent Specialist Report on the Mineral Assets of Alice Queen Limited Valuation ■ Final
Note: Bubble size denotes total area.
Figure 6.5: Area-based multiples for EL and mixed tenure types - Australia
==> picture [388 x 296] intentionally omitted <==
----- Start of picture text -----
10,000,000
1,000,000
100,000 • •
.
•
10,000
•
ro 1,000
100
10 - - ------
1
1.00 10.00 100.00 1,000.00 10,000.00
Area {km [2] )
EL • Mixed --Log. {EL) --Log. {Mixed)
Source: SRK analysis
Note: Bubble size denotes total area.
----- End of picture text -----
Figure 6.6: Area-based copper multiples -Australia
==> picture [418 x 256] intentionally omitted <==
----- Start of picture text -----
40,000.00
NE
30,000.00
E 25,000.00
20,000.00
15,000.00
10,000.00
5,000.00
-2,000.00 -1,000.00 4,000.00 5,000.00 8,000.00
-5,000.00
-10,000.00 Area (km [2] )
•All data New South Wales
Source: SRK analysis
Note: Bubble size denotes total area.
----- End of picture text -----
SRK CONSULTING (AUSTRALASIA) PTY LTD ■ 27 MAY 2024 ■ SJ, CD, MD/JM
81
Independent Specialist Report on the Mineral Assets of Alice Queen Limited Valuation ■ Final
Figure 6.7: Area-based copper multiples -Asia Pacific
==> picture [386 x 263] intentionally omitted <==
----- Start of picture text -----
1,200,000.00-
1,000,000.00
800,000.00
600,000.00
gAsla-Pacific
400,000 00--- --
-200.00 600.00
-200,000.00
Area (km [1] )
Source: SRK analysis
Note: Bubble size denotes total area.
----- End of picture text -----
Table 6.8: Area-based transaction multiple analysis for gold projects -Australia
| **Area multiple (A$/km2) ** | **Normalised area multiple (A$/km2) ** | |
|---|---|---|
| All tenure | ||
| Count | 157 | 157 |
| Minimum | 16.1 | 19.9 |
| Median | 6,818.2 | 8,061.5 |
| Average | 134,308.6 | 164,950.1 |
| Maximum | 6,009,615.4 | 6,822,383.8 |
| Weighted average | 6,767.0 | 8,316.5 |
| Exploration tenure in Queensland | ||
| Count | 14 | 14 |
| Minimum | 134.3 | 189.6 |
| Median | 3,470.8 | 4,569.1 |
| Average | 15,838.4 | 19,282.8 |
| Maximum | 95,663.3 | 119,284.9 |
| Weighted average | 4,916.0 | 6,015.2 |
| Exploration tenure in New South Wales | ||
| Count | 10 | 10 |
| Minimum | 159.2 | 218.3 |
| Median | 5,963.0 | 7,438.4 |
| Average | 9,517.5 | 11,665.3 |
| Maximum | 29,708.9 | 34,107.4 |
| Weighted average | 10,153.0 | 12,344.4 |
Source: SRK analysis
SRK CONSULTING (AUSTRALASIA) PTY LTD ■ 27 MAY 2024 ■ SJ, CD, MD/JM
82
Independent Specialist Report on the Mineral Assets of Alice Queen Limited Valuation • Final
Table 6.9: Area-based transaction multiple analysis for copper projects - Australia
| Table 6.9: Area |
-based transaction multiple an | alysis for copper projects - Australia |
|---|---|---|
| **Area multiple (A$/km2) ** | **Normalised area multiple (A$/km2) ** | |
| All projects | ||
| Count | 50 | 50 |
| Minimum | 9.6 | 12.0 |
| Median | 3,748.2 | 4,651.0 |
| Average | 49,765.2 | 53,027.5 |
| Maximum | 1,897,533.2 | 1,897,533.2 |
| Weighted average | 4,457.8 | 5,485.3 |
| **Projects with only ** | exploration licences in New South | Wales |
| Count | 7 | 7 |
| Minimum | 9.6 | 12.0 |
| Median | 544.5 | 593.4 |
| Average | 10,527.0 | 11,565.1 |
| Maximum | 36,134.5 | 38,843.1 |
| Weighted average | 2,601.8 | 2,968.3 |
Source: SRK analysis
Table 6.1 O: Area-based transaction multiple analysis copper projects - Asia Pacific
| Area multiple(A$/km2) | Normalised area multiple(A$/km2) | |
|---|---|---|
| All transactions | ||
| Count | 14 | 14 |
| Minimum | 599.82 | 1,021.74 |
| Median | 21,841.88 | 38,109.21 |
| Average | 54,571.69 | 93,629.43 |
| Maximum | 240,035.66 | 418,298.03 |
| Weighted average | 41,897.83 | 69,725.37 |
| Multiples excluding Newcrest earn-in transactions | ||
| Count | 12 | 12 |
| Minimum | 599.82 | 1,021.74 |
| Median | 18,571.39 | 31,695.83 |
| Average | 27,752.54 | 46,648.07 |
| Maximum | 126,796.52 | 243,274.78 |
| Weighted average | 17,839.02 | 27,343.61 |
| Transactions occurring since 2020 | ||
| Count | 3 | 3 |
| Minimum | 1,988.22 | 2,145.55 |
| Median | 5,345.83 | 6,288.32 |
| Average | 19,352.58 | 19,719.18 |
| Maximum | 50,723.68 | 50,723.68 |
| Weighted average | 14,930.99 | 15,102.75 |
Source: SRK analysis
Based on its review of the available technical information, SRK has assessed the value of the
regional exploration holdings of Alice Queen. All values were estimated on a 100% attributable basis.
83
SRK CONSUL TING (AUSTRALASIA) PTY LTD • 27 MAY 2024 ■ SJ, CD, MD/JM
Independent Specialist Report on the Mineral Assets of Alice Queen Limited Valuation • Final
SRK has selected its valuation range for the exploration-stage tenures based on the size of the tenure and selected its preferred value based on the perceived prospectivity of each tenement.
Summary of comparable transactions method - Exploration Potential
Using the comparable transactions method (Table 6.11 ), SRK considers a 100% interest in the exploration potential of the Mineral Assets of Alice Queen resides between A$2.7 million and A$5.3 million, with a preferred value of A$4.0 million.
Table 6.11: Summary of exploration potential value using transactions analysis - 100% attributable basis
| Project | Area **(km2) ** |
Average1 multiples by area (A$/km2) Low High Preferred |
Average1 multiples by area (A$/km2) Low High Preferred |
Average1 multiples by area (A$/km2) Low High Preferred |
Market value (A$ M) Low High Preferred |
Market value (A$ M) Low High Preferred |
Market value (A$ M) Low High Preferred |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Horn Island (EPM25520) |
64 | 10,000 | 20,000 | 15,000 | 0.64 | 1.28 | 0.96 |
| Kaiwalagal (EPM25418) |
252 | 500 1,000 |
750 | 0.13 | 0.25 | 0.19 | |
| Yarindur (EL8646) | 249.0079 | 2,500 5,000 |
3,750 | 0.62 | 1.25 0.93 |
||
| Mendooran(EL8469) | 291.19678 | 250 500 |
375 | 0.07 | 0.15 | 0.11 | |
| Byrock(EL9568) | 1,630.8613 | 100 200 |
150 | 0.16 | 0.33 | 0.24 | |
| Gongolgon(EL9569) | 1,438.5778 | 100 200 |
150 | 0.14 | 0.29 | 0.22 | |
| Viani(SPL 1513) | 27 | 1,500 | 3,000 | 2,250 | 0.04 | 0.08 | 0.06 |
| Nabila(SPL 1514)-5662 | 208 | 4,000 | 8,000 | 6,000 | 0.83 | 1.66 | 1.25 |
| Sabeto (SPL 1518)- 5662 |
14 | 1,500 | 3,000 | 2,250 | 0.02 | 0.04 | 0.03 |
| Alice Queen assets on an 100% attributable basis | 2.7 | 5.3 | 4.0 |
Source: SRK analysis (Total is rounded)
6.4.2 Geoscientific rating method
As a cross-check to the values implied by market multiples, SRK has also considered the geoscientific rating method, a cost-based method. The geoscientific rating or modified Kilburn method of valuation attempts to quantify the relevant technical aspects of a property through appropriate multipliers (factors) applied to an appropriate base (or intrinsic) value and is considered to be a cost-based method of valuation. The intrinsic value is referred to as the base acquisition cost (BAC), which represents the 'average cost to identify, apply for and retain a base unit of area of title' for one year.
Multipliers are considered for 1) off-property aspects, 2) on-property aspects, 3) anomaly aspects, and 4) geology aspects. These multipliers are applied sequentially to the BAC to estimate the Technical Value for each tenement. A further market factor is then considered to derive a Market Value.
A BAC has been assumed in this valuation, which incorporates annual rental, administration and application fees in addition to nominal indicative minimum expenditure on acquisition and costs of identification (Table 6.12, Table 6.13 and Table 6.14.) to be the following:
-
A$475/km [2 ] for an EL in Queensland
-
A$500/km [2 ] for an EL in New South Wales
-
A$120/km [2 ] for an SPL in Fiji.
SRK CONSULTING (AUSTRALASIA) PTY LTD • 27 MAY 2024 • SJ, CD, MD/JM
84
Independent Specialist Report on the Mineral Assets of Alice Queen Limited Valuation ■ Final
Table 6.12: Underlying assumption for base acquisition cost - Exploration Licence in Queensland
| Attribute | Rate/unit |
|---|---|
| Average licence size (km2) | 205 |
| Application fee (A$) | 1042.43 |
| Annual rent based on average size*(A$) | |
| Expenditure commitments based on average size/sub-blocks (A$) | 85,417 |
| Costs of identification, legal costs and negotiations and compensation agreements (A$) | 10,000 |
| Community and cultural consultation and engagement (A$) | 1,000.0 |
| Total cost- BAC (A$) | 97,459 |
| BAC (A$) | 475 |
*Rent waived until 2028 to encourage sector growth.
Table 6.13: Underlying assumptions for base acquisition cost- Exploration Licence in New South Wales
| Attribute | Rate/unit |
|---|---|
| Average licence size (km2) | 134 |
| Average licence age (years) | 6 |
| Application fee (A$) | 2,679 |
| Annual rent average (A$) | 20 |
| Minimum annual expenditure (A$) | 50,000 |
| Costs of identification, legal costs and negotiations and compensation agreements (A$) | 10,000 |
| Annual rates (A$) | 1,000 |
| Total cost- BAC (A$) | 66,366 |
| BAC (A$) | 500 |
Table 6.14: Underlying assumptions for base acquisition cost - Special Prospecting Licence in Fiji
| Attribute | Rate/unit |
|---|---|
| Area (km2) | 12 |
| Period (years) | 5 |
| Application fee (F$) | |
| Preparation of a prospecting licence (F$) | 20 |
| Annual fee first 200 ha | 40 |
| 150 | |
| Annual fee after 200 ha | 375 |
| Exploration (F$/km2) | 128 |
| **BAC of average licence (F$/km2) ** | 177 |
| BAC of average licence (A$/km2) | 120** |
*Average of Industry exploration expenditure in Fiji
**rounded
Source for exchange rate: https://www.oanda.com/- 23/04/2024
SRK CONSULTING (AUSTRALASIA) PTY LTD ■ 27 MAY 2024 ■ SJ, CD, MD/JM
85
Independent Specialist Report on the Mineral Assets of Alice Queen Limited Valuation ■ Final
In converting its implied technical values to a market value, SRK considers that market participants would apply a premium to the technical value given the prevailing market sentiment towards gold pro[j] ects in Australia and recent gold price performance. SRK has therefore applied a 10% premium to Alice Queen's gold assets in Queensland. Despite an overall downward trend over the last 1-2 years, the recent spike in the copper price may indicate a stabilisation of copper market, and SRK has therefore elected not to apply either a premium or a discount to Alice Queen's copper assets in New South Wales and copper-gold assets in Fi[j] i.
Furthermore, SRK considers that any tenures which remain in application are likely to attract a 20% discount to reflect the uncertainty associated with the likely timing of their grant, as well as approval conditions associated with their grant.
The geoscientific rating criteria are presented in Table 6.15.
SRK CONSULTING (AUSTRALASIA) PTY LTD ■ 27 MAY 2024 ■ SJ, CD, MD/JM
86
Independent Specialist Report on the Mineral Assets of Alice Queen Limited Valuation ■ Final
Table 6.15: Modified property rating criteria
| Rating | Off-property factor | On-property factor | Geological factor | Anomaly factor |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.1 | Unfavourable geological setting | No mineralisation identified - area sterilised | ||
| 0.5 | Unfavourable district/basin | Unfavourable area | Poor geological setting | Extensive previous exploration provided poor results |
| 0.9 | Generally favourable geological setting, under cover or complexly deformed or metamorphosed |
Poor results to date | ||
| 1.0 | No known mineralisation in district |
No known mineralisation on lease |
Generally favourable geological setting | No targets outlined |
| 1.5 | Minor workings | Minor workings or mineralised zones exposed |
Target identifed; initial indications positive | |
| 2.0 | Several old workings in district | Several old workings or exploration targets identified |
Multiple exploration models being applied simultaneously Well-defined exploration model applied to new areas |
Significant grade intercepts evident but not linked on cross or long sections Several economic grade intercepts on adjacent sections |
| 2.5 | ||||
| 3.0 3.5 4.0 |
Mine or abundant workings with significant previous production Along strike from a major deposit |
Mine or abundant workings with significant previous production Major mine with significant historical production |
Significant mineralised zones exposed in prospective host rock Well-understood exploration model, with valid targets in structurally complex area, or under cover |
|
| 5.0 | Along strike for a world class deposit |
Well-understood exploration model, with valid targets in well understood stratigraphy |
||
| 6.0 | Advanced exploration model constrained by known and well-understood mineralisation |
|||
| 10.0 | World-class mine |
Source: Modified after Xstract, 2009 and Agricola Mining Consultants, 2011.
SRK CONSUL TING (AUSTRALASIA) PTY LTD • 27 MAY 2024 ■ SJ, CD, MD/JM
87
Independent Specialist Report on the Mineral Assets of Alice Queen Limited Valuation ■ Final
Table 6.16: Geoscientific rating valuation of Alice Queen's tenure
| Permit | *Area (km2) ** | BAC | Equity Interest | Of-property | Of-property | On-property | On-property | Geology | Geology | Anomaly | Anomaly | Market | Application | Valuation | Valuation | (A$ M) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (A$) | (%) | Low | High | Low | High | Low | High | Low | High | Factor | Factor | Low | High | Preferred | ||
| Queensland | ||||||||||||||||
| Horn Island (EPM25520) | 64 | 30,400.00 | 100 | 2 | 2.5 | 3.5 | 0 | 2.5 | 3 | 3 | 3.5 | 1.1 | 1 | 1.51 | 3.07 | 2.29 |
| Kaiwalagal (EPM25418) | 252 | 119,700.00 | 100 | 2 | 2.5 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1.5 | 1 | 1 | 1.1 | 1 | 0.26 | 0.49 | 0.38 |
| New South Wales | ||||||||||||||||
| Yarindury (EL8646) | 249.0079 | 124,503.95 | 100 | 2.5 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0.9 | 1.5 | 1 | 1.5 | 1 | 1 | 0.28 | 0.84 | 0.56 |
| Mendooran (EL8469) | 291.19678 | 145,598.39 | 100 | 2 | 2.5 | 1 | 0 | 0.9 | 1.5 | 0.9 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0.24 | 0.55 | 0.39 |
| Byrock (EL9568) | 1,630.8613 | 815,430.69 | 100 | 2 | 2.5 | 1 | 0 | 0.9 | 1.5 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1.47 | 3.06 | 2.26 |
| Gongolgon (EL9569) | 1,438.5778 | 719,288.88 | 100 | 2 | 2.5 | 1 | 0 | 0.9 | 1.5 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1.30 | 2.70 | 2.00 |
| Fiji | ||||||||||||||||
| Viani (SPL 1513) | 27 | 3,240.00 | 100 | 1.5 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1.5 | 2 | 1.5 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0.01 | 0.03 | 0.02 |
| Nabila (SPL 1514)-5662 | 208 | 24,960.00 | 100 | 1.5 | 2 | 2.5 | 0 | 2.5 | 3 | 3 | 3.5 | 1 | 1 | 0.56 | 1.31 | 0.94 |
| Sabeto (SPL 1518)-5662 | 14 | 1,680.00 | 100 | 1.5 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1.5 | 2 | 1.5 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.01 |
SRK CONSUL TING (AUSTRALASIA) PTY LTD ■ 27 MAY 2024 ■ SJ, CO, MO/JM
88
Independent Specialist Report on the Mineral Assets of Alice Queen Limited Valuation • Final
Summary of geoscientific rating method
Using the geoscientific rating method (calculations presented in Table 6.16), SRK considers a 100% interest in the exploration potential of the Mineral Assets of Alice Queen resides between A$5.6 million and A$12.1 million, with a preferred value of A$8.8 million.
Table 6.17: Summary of exploration potential value using the geoscientific rating (Kilburn) method -Alice Queen 100% attributable basis
| Project | Area | Market Value (A$ M) | Market Value (A$ M) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| **(km2) ** | Low | High |
Preferred | |
| Queensland | 316.0 | 1.8 | 3.6 | 2.7 |
| New South Wales | 3,609.6 | 3.3 | 7.1 | 5.2 |
| Fiji | 249.0 | 0.6 | 1.3 | 1.0 |
| Alice Queen assets 100% attributable basis | 5.6 | 12.1 | 8.8 |
Source: SRK analysis (Total is rounded)
6.4.3 Summary of exploration potential valuation
In estimating the value of the exploration potential outside of the defined Mineral Resource areas, SRK has considered the values implied by comparable transactions and geoscientific rating methods.
In considering the overall value of the Mineral Assets, SRK has given equal weighting to both valuation methods, as it has no strong inclination to the values implied by one method over another for all assets except the Byrock and Gongolgon Els. For these very large tenures, SRK has elected to select the comparable transactions values in preference to those implied by other methods due to the tendency of the geoscientific rating method to over value very large tenures. For all other tenures, SRK has adopted the mid-point or average as its preferred value.
Selected values
SRK considers the Market Value of the exploration potential of Alice Queen's Mineral Assets resides between A$2.9 million and A$6.1 million, with a preferred value of A$4.5 million (Table 6.18). SRK's preferred value represents the mid-point of the adopted range, as SRK has no strong inclination towards either end of the range.
SRK CONSULTING (AUSTRALASIA) PTY LTD • 27 MAY 2024 ■ SJ, CD, MD/JM
89
Independent Specialist Report on the Mineral Assets of Alice Queen Limited Valuation ■ Final
Table 6.18: SRK valuation summary - exploration potential for Alice Queen
| Project | Method | Low | High | Preferred |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| (A$ M) | (A$ M) | (A$ M) | ||
| Horn Island (EPM25520) | Comparable transactions | 0.64 | 1.28 | 0.96 |
| Geoscientific rating | 1.51 | 3.07 | 2.29 | |
| Selected | 1.07 | 2.18 | 1.62 | |
| Kaiwalagal (EPM25418) | Comparable transactions | 0.13 | 0.25 | 0.19 |
| Geoscientific rating | 0.26 | 0.49 | 0.38 | |
| Selected | 0.19 | 0.37 | 0.28 | |
| Yarindury (EL8646) | Comparable transactions | 0.62 | 1.25 | 0.93 |
| Geoscientific rating | 0.28 | 0.84 | 0.56 | |
| Selected | 0.45 | 1.04 | 0.75 | |
| Mendooran (EL8469) | Comparable transactions | 0.07 | 0.16 | 0.11 |
| Geoscientific rating | 0.25 | 0.55 | 0.39 | |
| Selected | 0.16 | 0.35 | 0.25 | |
| Byrock (EL9568) | Comparable transactions | 0.16 | 0.33 | 0.24 |
| Geoscientific rating | 1.47 | 3.06 | 2.26 | |
| Selected | 0.16 | 0.33 | 0.25 | |
| Gongolgon (EL9569) | Comparable transactions | 0.14 | 0.29 | 0.22 |
| Geoscientific rating | 1.30 | 2.70 | 2.00 | |
| Selected | 0.14 | 0.29 | 0.22 | |
| Viani (SPL 1513) | Comparable transactions | 0.04 | 0.08 | 0.06 |
| Geoscientific rating | 0.01 | 0.03 | 0.02 | |
| Selected | 0.03 | 0.05 | 0.04 | |
| Nabila (SPL 1514)-5662 | Comparable transactions | 0.83 | 1.66 | 1.25 |
| Geoscientific rating | 0.56 | 1.31 | 0.94 | |
| Selected | 0.70 | 1.49 | 1.09 | |
| Sabeto (SPL 1518)-5662 | Comparable transactions | 0.02 | 0.04 | 0.03 |
| Geoscientific rating | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.01 | |
| Selected | 0.01 | 0.03 | 0.02 | |
| All | Selected Total | 2.92 | 6.12 | 4.52 |
Source: SRK analysis (Total is rounded)
6.5 Valuation summary
Based on its technical assessment presented in the earlier sections of this Report, SRK has completed a valuation of the Mineral Assets of Alice Queen in accordance with its mandate.
In considering the overall value of the Mineral Assets, SRK has selected the values implied by the comparable transactions method as its preferred value, noting the unique location of the Horn Island project is unlikely to be captured by the industry yardstick metrics (Table 6.19).
SRK CONSULTING (AUSTRALASIA) PTY LTD ■ 27 MAY 2024 ■ SJ, CD, MD/JM
90
Independent Specialist Report on the Mineral Assets of Alice Queen Limited Valuation ■ Final
In estimating the value of the exploration potential at Alice Queen's mineral tenures outside the Mineral Resource, SRK has considered the values implied by comparable transactions and geoscientific rating methods.
In considering the overall value of the Mineral Assets, SRK has given equal weighting to both valuation methods, as it has no strong inclination to the values implied by one method over another for all assets except the Byrock and Gongolgon Els. For these very large tenures, SRK has elected to select the comparable transactions method as the preferred due to the tendency of the geoscientific rating method to over-value very large tenures. For all tenure, SRK has adopted the mid-point or average as its preferred value.
SRK has considered actual transactions relating to the assets which occurred recently. SRK notes certain of the assets have transacted but due to the exploration undertaken since these transactions took place the implied values are not considered to provide a meaningful guide towards Market Value as at the Valuation Date.
There are numerous stockpiles (at Horn Island) reported. For the avoidance of doubt, SRK has not valued these stockpiles on a standalone basis as there is insufficient information to estimate a tonnage and grade. SRK notes that the value of these stockpiles has been captured in SRK's analysis of the remaining exploration potential.
SRK has been notified of a number of commercial in confidence offers in which approaches have been made to Alice Queen directors for the potential acquisition of certain assets. None of these offers were binding, have subsequently been terminated and were not sufficiently advanced to be publicly disclosed. SRK has reviewed the terms of these offers and considered where appropriate in its valuation of Alice Queen.
Valuation summary
Based on its analysis, SRK considers the Market Value of the Mineral Assets of Alice Queen resides between A$11.1 million and A$22.5 million, with a preferred valuation of A$16.8 million (Table 6.19), which represents the mid-point of the adopted range.
SRK CONSULTING (AUSTRALASIA) PTY LTD ■ 27 MAY 2024 ■ SJ, CD, MD/JM
91
Independent Specialist Report on the Mineral Assets of Alice Queen Limited Valuation ■ Final
Table 6.19: Summary of the Market Value of the Mineral Assets of Alice Queen
| Project | Asset Type | Selected method or | Low | High | Preferred |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| combination | (A$ M) | (A$ M) | (A$ M) | ||
| Horn Island (EPM25520) | Area | Average | 1.07 | 2.18 | 1.63 |
| Resource | Comparable transactions | 8.17 | 16.34 | 12.26 | |
| Subtotal | 9.24 | 18.52 | 13.88 | ||
| Kaiwalagal (EPM25418) | Area | Average | 0.19 | 0.37 | 0.28 |
| Resource | |||||
| Subtotal | 0.19 | 0.37 | 0.28 | ||
| Yarindur (EL8646) | Area | Average | 0.45 | 1.04 | 0.75 |
| Resource | |||||
| Subtotal | 0.45 | 1.04 | 0.75 | ||
| Mendooran (EL8469) | Area | Average | 0.16 | 0.35 | 0.25 |
| Resource | |||||
| Subtotal | 0.16 | 0.35 | 0.25 | ||
| Byrock (EL9568) | Area | Comparable transactions | 0.16 | 0.33 | 0.25 |
| Resource | |||||
| Subtotal | 0.16 | 0.33 | 0.25 | ||
| Gongolgon (EL9569) | Area | Comparable transactions | 0.14 | 0.29 | 0.22 |
| Resource | |||||
| Subtotal | 0.14 | 0.29 | 0.22 | ||
| Viani (SPL1513) | Area | Average | 0.03 | 0.05 | 0.04 |
| Resource | |||||
| Subtotal | 0.03 | 0.05 | 0.04 | ||
| Nabila (SPL 1514) | Area | Average | 0.70 | 1.49 | 1.09 |
| Resource | |||||
| Subtotal | 0.70 | 1.49 | 1.09 | ||
| Sabeto (SPL 1518) | Area | Average | 0.01 | 0.03 | 0.02 |
| Resource | |||||
| Subtotal | 0.01 | 0.03 | 0.02 | ||
| All | Area | 2.9 | 6.1 | 4.5 | |
| Resource | 8.2 | 16.3 | 12.3 | ||
| Total | 11.1 | 22.5 | 16.8 |
Note: Any discrepancies between values in the tables are due to rounding.
In defining its valuation ranges, SRK notes that there are always inherent risks involved when deriving any arm's length valuation. These factors can ultimately result in significant differences in valuations over time. By applying narrower confidence ranges, a greater degree of certainty regarding these assets is being implied than may be the case. Where possible, SRK has endeavoured to narrow its valuation range.
SRK CONSULTING (AUSTRALASIA) PTY LTD ■ 27 MAY 2024 ■ SJ, CD, MD/JM
92
Independent Specialist Report on the Mineral Assets of Alice Queen Limited Valuation • Final
Closure
This Report, Independent Specialist Report on the Mineral Assets of Alice Queen Limited, was prepared by
==> picture [165 x 82] intentionally omitted <==
Stephen Johnson Senior Consultant
and
==> picture [88 x 26] intentionally omitted <==
Mathew Davies Senior Consultant
and reviewed by
srk consulting =w=
This sign ure has.,.b�JHJ,,jtanned. The author 1s ft,��e for this do ment. The original signature is hel n file
Jeames McKibben
Principal Consultant
All data used as source material plus the text, tables, figures, and attachments of this document have been reviewed and prepared in accordance with generally accepted professional engineering and environmental practices.
SRK CONSULTING (AUSTRALASIA) PTY LTD • 27 MAY 2024 ■ SJ, CD, MD/JM
93
Independent Specialist Report on the Mineral Assets of Alice Queen Limited References ■ Final
References
Alice Queen Limited, 2018. ASX announcement, 2 August 2018. Horn Island resource upgrade.
Alice Queen Limited, 2020. Report for the period ending 12 September 2020. EL8646 Yarindury Project NSW, Community Consultation.
Alice Queen Limited, 2021. ASX announcement, 10 March 2021. Nabila Project Update.
Alice Queen Limited, 2021. ASX announcement, 30 June 2021. Drilling confirms new broad gold zone at Horn Island.
Alice Queen Limited, 2021. ASX announcement, 10 March 2021. Multiple gold targets identified at Kaiwalagal.
Alice Queen Limited, 2021. ASX announcement, 10 November 2021. Horn Island Scoping Study Outcomes and Mineral Resource Estimate.
Alice Queen Limited, 2022. ASX announcement, 2 January 2022. Positive gold results from stockpile drilling at Horn Island.
Alice Queen Limited, 2022. ASX announcement, 16 May 2022. Horn Island drilling reveals sulphides, mineralisation and visible gold.
Alice Queen Limited, 2022. ASX announcement, 2 June 2022. Drilling extends gold zone and high-grade copper hit.
Alice Queen Limited, 2022. ASX announcement, 2 November 2022. Boda East drilling confirms continuity of mineralisation.
Alice Queen Limited, 2022. ASX announcement, 17 November 2022. Viani Project Update.
Alice Queen Limited, 2022. ASX announcement, 31 December 2022. Quarterly Activities Report.
Alice Queen Limited, 2023. ASX announcement, 9 January 2023. Projects Update.
Alice Queen Limited, 2023. ASX announcement, 12 January 2023. Horn Island critical minerals grant application.
Alice Queen Limited, 2023. ASX announcement, 6 March 2023. Viani Project Update.
Alice Queen Limited, 2023. ASX announcement, 5 April 2023. Tuvatu Project Update.
Alice Queen Limited, 2022. ASX announcement, 5 April 2023. Sabeto Project Update.
Alice Queen Limited, 2022. ASX announcement, 30 June 2023. Annual Report.
Alice Queen Limited 2023. ASX announcement, 31 October 2023. Quarterly Activities Report.
Alice Queen Limited, 2023. ASX announcement, 13 December 2023. Boda East Drill Results and Project Update.
Alice Queen Limited, 2024. ASX announcement, 31 January 2024. Quarterly Activities Report.
Alice Queen Limited, 2024. ASX announcement, 26 February 2024. Porphyry target emerging at Sabeto.
Alice Queen Limited, 2024. ASX announcement, 5 April 2024. Quarterly Activities Report.
Allen and Horton, 1991. Mistry Prospect SPL 1216, Fiji. Exploration Report.
SRK CONSUL TING (AUSTRALASIA) PTY LTD ■ 27 MAY 2024 ■ SJ, CD, MD/JM
94
Independent Specialist Report on the Mineral Assets of Alice Queen Limited References • Final
AusAid Survey, 1997. Regional Airborne Magnetic and Radiometric Data.
AusAid Survey, 1998. Regional Airborne Magnetic and Radiometric Data.
-
Begg, G and Gray, D R, 2002. Arc dynamics and tectonic history of Fiji based on stress and kinematic analysis of dikes and faults of the Tavua Volcano, Viti Levu Island, Fiji. Tectonics, 21(4), 5-1.
-
Slevin, P, 2011. Petrological, Chemical, and Metallogenic Notes on the Granites of the Bourke 250k Sheet, NSW. Petrochem Consultants Pty Ltd.
-
Burlet, 2015. Independent Expert Report on Horn Island and Looking Glass Projects (EMP25520 and EL8225).
-
Champion, D C and Bultitude, R J, 2013. The geochemical and SrNd isotopic characteristics of Paleozoic fractionated S-types granites of north Queensland: Implications for S-type granite petrogenesis. Lithos, 162: 37-56.
-
Clarke, R, Smith, D and Naden, J, 2022. Source controls on mineralisation: Regional geology and magmatic evolution of Fiji. Lithos, 432: 106897.
-
Cross, A, Dhnaram, C R, Lisitsin, V, Bultitude, R J, Brown, D, Purdy, DJ and van Gnielinski, F E, 2019: Summary of results. Joint GSQ-GA geochronology project: Cairns, Cape York and Georgetown regions, 2015-2016. Queensland Geological Record, 2019/01.
Davis, R J, 1988. Report on a geological investigation of the Faddy's Prospect, SPL 1216, Viti Levu, Fiji.
- Department of Regional New South Wales, 2008. NSW Seamless Geology. Department of Regional New South Wales [online). Available from: https://datasets.seed.nsw.gov.au/dataseU5d6e177a-9a78490c-a570-47c38bbb4399/metaexport/html Accessed 19 March 2024.
Eskrom, J R, 1975. Geological Report of Mistry Mine area, Special Prospecting Licence 1104.
-
Foster, D A and Gray, D R, 2000. Evolution and structure of the Lachlan Fold Belt (Orogen) of eastern Australia. Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences, 28(1): 47-80.
-
Geopacific Resources Limited, 2008. ASX announcement, 27 November 2008. Bonanza gold grades intersected at the Faddy's Gold Deposit, Fiji.
-
Geopacific Resources Limited, 2009. ASX announcement, 21 January 2009. Bonanza gold grades intersected in surface trench samples at the NE Gossan Zone, Faddy's Gold Deposit, Fiji.
Geopacific Resources Limited, 2009. ASX announcement, 31 December 2009, Annual Report.
Geopacific Resources Limited, 2012. ASX announcement, 7 May 2012. Annual Report.
Geopacific Resources Limited, 2012. ASX announcement, 27 June 2012. Quarterly Report.
-
Geopacific Resources Limited, 2013. ASX announcement, 1 February 2013. Bonanza gold grades intersected at the Faddy's Gold Deposit, Fiji.
-
Geopacific Resources Limited, 2016. Information Memorandum, Technical Review of Geopacific Resources Limited (GPR) Fiji Properties.
-
Glen, R A, Crawford, A J and Cooke, D R, 2007. Tectonic setting of porphyry Cu-Au mineralisation in the Ordovician-Early Silurian Macquarie Arc, Eastern Lachlan Orogen, New South Wales. Australian 54: 465-479.
-
Journal of Earth Sciences,
Glen, R A and Wyborn, D, 1997. Inferred thrust imbrication, deformation gradients and the Lachlan
95
SRK CONSULTING (AUSTRALASIA) PTY LTD • 27 MAY 2024 ■ SJ, CD, MD/JM
Independent Specialist Report on the Mineral Assets of Alice Queen Limited References • Final
Transverse Zone in the eastern belt of the Lachlan Orogen, New South Wales. Australian Journal of Earth Sciences, 44: 49-68.
Hatcher, R, 1998. Relation of structures, alteration and mineralisation at the Tuvatu gold prospect, Viti Levu, Fiji Islands, unpublished Bachelor of Applied Science thesis, Brisbane, Queensland Institute of Technology, 151 p. Hathway, 1993
-
Kositcin, N, Lisitsin, V, Bultitude, R J, Purdy, DJ, Brown, D D, Von Gnielinski, F E and Dhnaram, C, 2016. Summary of results-Joint GSQ-GA geochronology project: Thomson Orogen, Mossman Orogen and Cape York, 2015-2016. Queensland Geological Record 2016/09.
-
Kositcin, N, Champion, D and Huston, D, 2009. Geodynamic Synthesis of the North Queensland Region and Implications for Metallogeny. Geoscience Australia. Record 2009/30. Geocat# 69159.
-
Levy, I W and Storey, N J M, 1990. Horn Island gold deposit, in F E Hughes (Editor): Geology of the Mineral Deposits of Australia and Papua New Guinea. The Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy, Melbourne, 1451-1454.
Levrel, M, 2021. Report on reconnaissance exploration, Viani Prospect with ALS results, SPL 1513.
-
Lickfold, V, Cooke, D, Smith, S G and Ullrich, T D, 2003. Endeavour copper-gold porphyry deposits, North Parkes, New South Wales: intrusive history and fluid evolution. University of Tasmania. Journal contribution.
-
Millenium Mining, 1999. Internal report on exploration of the Mistry gold project - SPL 1216, Viti Levu, Fiji Islands.
-
Millenium Mining, 2002. Annual technical report on exploration of the Nabila Gold Project - SPL 1216 Viti Levu, Fiji Islands.
-
Millenium Mining, 2005. Nabila and Kavukavu tenements (SPL 1216 and SPL 1415), Viti Levu, Fiji Islands: preliminary report on April 2005 site visits with focus on current exploration at Kuro ni Kuola gold deposit.
Monzonite Metals Pty Ltd, 2022. EL8469 Mendooran Project Annual Exploration Report 2022 (Part A).
Monzonite Metals Pty Ltd, 2022. EL8646 Yarindury Project Annual Exploration Report 2022 (Part A).
- Newcrest Mining Limited, 2017. EL8469 Mendooran Project Annual Mineral Exploration Report for twelve months to 29 September 2017.
Pathfinder Exploration Pty Ltd, 2010. Internal Memorandum.
- Peel, MC, Finlayson, B L and McMahon, T A, 2007. Updated world map of the Koppen-Geiger climate classification, Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 11 (5), 1633-1644. doi:10.5194/hess-111633-2007.
Pontifex & Associates, 2009. Mineralogical report No. 9505.
Price, D W, 1999. Internal report on exploration of the Mistry gold project - SPL 1216 Viti Levu, Fiji islands.
Rama Geoscience, 2017. Mendooran 3D Magnetic Inversion Modelling Memo Report.
Raymond, 0 L, 2018. Australian Geological Provinces 2018.01 edition. Geoscience Australia, Canberra. https://dx.doi.org/10.26186/116823.
Rose, J, 2001. Report on geology field mapping, February - May 2001 for Millennium Mining (Fiji) Limited -
SRK CONSUL TING (AUSTRALASIA) PTY LTD ■ 27 MAY 2024 ■ SJ, CD, MD/JM
96
Independent Specialist Report on the Mineral Assets of Alice Queen Limited References ■ Final
Nabila project, Fiji.
Levrel, M and Sims, D 2021. Desktop review of historical exploration data, Nabila Project, SPL 1514.
- Sun, G Z, Xu, W L, Wang, Z W, Guo, P, Liu, SW, 2018. Petrogenesis of Cenozoic shoshonitic rocks in Fiji: Constraints from mineral and whole-rock geochemistry. Geological Journal, 53(6), 2759-2778.
VALMIN Code, 2015. Australasian Code for Public Reporting of Technical Assessments and Valuations of Mineral Assets, prepared by the VALMIN Committee, a joint committee of the Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy and the Australian Institute of Geoscientists.
von Gnielinski, FE, Denaro, T J, Wellman, P and Pain, CF, 1997. Torres Strait Region. In J H C Bain and J J Draper, North Queensland Geology. AGSO Bulletin 240/Queensland Geology 9, pp. 159-164.
- Whelan, P M, Gill, J 8, Kollman, E, Duncan, R A, Drake, R E, 1985. Radiometric dating of magmatic stages in Fiji.
Willmott, W F, Whitaker, W G, Palfreyman, W D, Trail, D S, 1973. Igneous and metamorphic rocks of Cape York Peninsula and Torres Strait. Bureau of Mineral Resources, Geology and Geophysics, Australia, Bulletin 135.
Willmott, W F, and Powell, B S, 1977a. Torres Strait-Boigu-Daru, Qld. Bureau of Mineral Resources, Geology and Geophysics, Australia, 1 :250 000 Geological series -Explanatory Notes, Sheet SCl54-12.
Withnall, I W and Cranfield, L C, 2013. Geological Framework. Queensland Minerals.
Woodrow, P J, 1976. Geology of Southeastern Vanua Levu Maps. Mineral Resources Division, Fiji.
==> picture [5 x 75] intentionally omitted <==
SRK CONSULTING (AUSTRALASIA) PTY LTD ■ 27 MAY 2024 ■ SJ, CD, MD/JM
97
Appendix A Comparable transactions data
Resource multiples - comparable transactions -Australian gold projects
| Project | Dat | Purchaser | Vendor | Region | Development Stge |
Considerton (100% basis) |
Equity acquired |
Resource (Mt) |
Resource grde |
Resource only |
Resource trnsacton |
Resource trnsaction |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (A$M) | (%) | (git Au) | (koz) | multiple (rw) |
multiple (noralised) |
|||||||
| (A$oz) | (A$oz) | |||||||||||
| Mt Olympus project | Jun-20 | Kalamazoo Resources Limited | Norher Str Resources Limited | Wester Australia | Advanced Exploration | 5.00 | 100% | 20.79 | 2.47 | 1,68,429 | 3.03 | 3.97 |
| Ashburon project | Feb24 | De Grey Mining Limited | Kalamazoo Resources Limited | Wester Australia | Advanced Exploration/ | 31.00 | 100% | 16.19 | 2.74 | 1.426,031 | 21.74 | 23.07 |
| Scoping? | ||||||||||||
| Mt Clement project | Jul-20 | Norher Star Resources Limited | Aremis Resources Limited | Wester Australia | Advanced Explorton | 0.43 | 80% | 2.44 | 1.01 | 79,413 | 5.41 | 6.78 |
| City of Melboure mine | Dec-20 | Firefy Resources Limited | Undisclosed seller | Wester Australia | Advanced Exploraton | 2.91 | 100% | 2.75 | 1.57 | 138,811 | 20.96 | 27.99 |
| Abur Heath project | Apr-20 | Westgold Resources Limited | Cerantes Cororaton Limited | Wester Australia | Advanced Exploraton | 1.30 | 100% | 0.39 | 2.17 | 27,200 | 47.79 | 58.98 |
| Lindsays project | Dec-20 | Nu-Forune Gold Ltd | KalNorh Gold Mines Limited | Wester Australia | Care and Maintenance | 5.00 | 100% | 3.97 | 1.69 | 216,087 | 23.14 | 30.89 |
| Tumblegum South deposit | Mar-21 | Star Minerals Limited | Brah Resources Limited | Wester Australia | Advanced Exploration | 2.30 | 100% | 0.60 | 2.20 | 42.439 | 54.20 | 80.03 |
| Lighthouse gold project | Jan-23 | Sunshine Gold Limited | Rockre Resources pie | Queensland | Advanced Exploraton | 1.50 | 40% | 0.96 | 1.66 | 51,289 | 29.25 | 35.26 |
| Malmsbur gold project | Sep-20 | GBM Resources Limited | Novo Resources Corporation | Victora | Advanced Exploration | 7.00 | 50% | 0.82 | 4.00 | 105.454 | 66.38 | 82.14 |
| Grade Gnows Nest project | Sep-20 | Emu NL | Undisclosed seller | Wester Australia | Advanced Exploration | 1.84 | 100% | 0.11 | 3.78 | 13,781 | 133.51 | 165.22 |
| Malmsbur project | Mar-23 | Novo Resources Corp | GBM Resources Limited | Vicora | Advanced Exploration | 4.90 | 50% | 0.82 | 4.00 | 105.454 | 46.47 | 53.37 |
| Barrabool and Wildwood | Jul-20 | Norh Stawell Minerals | Leviathan Resources and SGM MLIA |
Vicora | Advanced Exploration | 9.80 | 51% | 0.88 | 2.00 | 56,26 | 174.25 | 218.17 |
| Jumbuck project | Jun-20 | Syngas Limited | Tyranna Resources Limited | South Australia | Advanced Explortion | 2.25 | 100% | 8.70 | 1.14 | 319,989 | 7.03 | 9.21 |
| Big Rush gold projec | Oct-22 | Great Easter Gold Ltd | Great Norher Minerals Limited | Queensland | Advanced Exploraton | 0.25 | 100% | 3.44 | 1.73 | 191,830 | 1.30 | 1.64 |
| Big Rush gold project | Oct-22 | Great Easter Gold Ltd | Great Norher Minerals Limited | Queensland | Advanced Exploration | 0.25 | 100% | 2.13 | 1.73 | 118,961 | 2.10 | 2.64 |
| Millrose projec | Jun-23 | Norher Str Resources Limited | Strickland Metals Limited | Wester Australia | Advanced Exploraton | 59.45 | 100% | 6.00 | 1.79 | 3 ,656 | 172.49 | 196.39 |
| Lighthouse Gold project | Jan-23 | Sunshine Gold Limited | Rockfre Resources pie | Queensland | Advanced Exploration | 1.50 | 40% | 0.96 | 1.66 | 51,28 | 29.25 | 35.27 |
| Camel Creek and Golden Cup projecs |
Nov-23 | Great Easter Gold Ltd | Great Norher Minerals Limited | Queensland | Advanced Exploration /Scoping? |
3.69 | 90% | 2.69 | 2.66 | 230,347 | 16.04 | 17.29 |
| Mount Coolon Project tenements | Oct-22 | Newcrest Operations Ltd | GBM Resources Limited | Queensland | Advanced Exploration/ | 13.73 | 51% | 6.62 | 1.53 | 326,622 | 42.02 | 52.8 |
| Scoping | ||||||||||||
| Mt Porer ML3839 | Sep-22 | PNX Metls Limited | Ausgold Trding P1y Ltd | Norther Territor | Advanced Explortion | 1.05 | 100% | 0.68 | 2.20 | 48,220 | 21.78 | 28.53 |
| Five tenements | Jul-22 | Tombola Gold Ltd | True North Copper P1y Ltd | Queensland | Advanced Exploration | 6.00 | 100% | 0.90 | 2.49 | 71,641 | 83.75 | 109.13 |
| 103 km2 area | May-20 | Golden Plain Resources Ply Ltd | Rimfre Pacific Mining NL | New South Wales | Advanced Exploration | 8.82 | 51% | 1.52 | 1.52 | 74,232 | 118.86 | 148.71 |
| Beaconsfeld mine | Feb-20 | NQ Minerals Pie | Undisclosed seller | Tasmania | Advanced Exploraton | 2.00 | 100% | 1.01 | 10.35 | 336,087 | 5.95 | 8.17 |
| Wlki project | Feb20 | Newcrest Mining Limited | Antipa Minerals Limited | Wester Australia | Ear to Advanced | 31.37 | 51% | 2.40 | 1.30 | 100,310 | 312.76 | 429.55 |
| Exploration | ||||||||||||
| Leonora project tenements | Aug-20 | Specrez Py Ltd | Kngwest Resources Limited | Wester Australia | Advanced Exploration | 0.19 | 100% | 3.34 | 0.96 | 103,088 | 1.84 | 2.22 |
| Pans project | Jul-20 | Torque Metals Limited | Austral Pacifc P1y Ltd | Wester Australia | Advanced Exploration | 1.85 | 100% | 0.31 | 3.23 | 32,608 | 56.73 | 71.03 |
| Malcolm project | Jul-20 | GoldLake Two Ply Ltd | Anova Metls Limited | Wester Australia | Early to advanced | 0.10 | 100% | 0.14 | 8.30 | 37,946 | 2.64 | 3.30 |
| Mining tenements, associated infomation, and infrastrucure & improvement |
Jul-21 | Metrovex P1y Ltd | Exension Hill P1y Ltd | Wester Australia | Advanced Exploraton | 39.60 | 100% | 79.70 | 0.80 | 2,049,930 | 19.32 | 26.11 |
| Project | Date | Purchaser | Vendor | Region | Development Stge |
Considertion (100% basis) (A$M) |
Equit acquired (%) |
Resource (Mt) |
Resource grde (g/tAu) |
Resource only (koz) |
Resource tnsacton multple (rw) (A$/oz) |
Resource trnsaction multple (nonalised) (AS/oz) |
| Horse Well project | May-21 | Strickand Metls limited | Silver Lake Resources limited | Wester Australia | Advanced Exploration | 4.73 | 37% | 5.70 | 1.40 | 256,563 | 18.43 | 25.45 |
| Millrose projec | Jun-21 | Strickland Metls limited | Investor group | Wester Ausralia | Advanced Exploration | 10.00 | 100% | 6.00 | 1.79 | 344,656 | 29.01 | 39.76 |
| Bulong South, Glandore and | May-21 | Horizon Minerals Limited | Aurenne Group Holdings Pty Ltd | Wester Australia | Feasibility Stared, | 5.00 | 100% | 0.14 | 5.16 | 23,598 | 211.88 | 292.45 |
| Cowama projects | Target Outline | |||||||||||
| Monument project | Aug-20 | Six Sigma Metals Limited | DiscvE Resources Limited | Wester Australia | Advanced Explortion | 0.55 | 100% | 0.86 | 1.80 | 49,480 | 11.12 | 13.38 |
| Kookynie project | Jun-20 | Genesis Minerls Limited | Investor group | Wester Australia | Advanced Exploraton | 13.50 | 100% | 8.53 | 1.48 | 405,485 | 33.29 | 43.61 |
| Fingals and Rowe's Find project | May-20 | Black Cat Syndicte Limited | Silver Lake Resources limited | Wester Australia | Advanced Exploraton | 5.44 | 100% | 5.20 | 2.50 | 417,959 | 13.01 | 16.28 |
| Nine Mining Tenement (Ben | Aug-20 | Regis Resources Limited | Stone Reources Australia | Wester Australia | Advanced Eploraton | 10.00 | 100% | 5.80 | 1.5 | 287,427 | 3.79 | 41.89 |
| Hur) | Limited | |||||||||||
| Blue Spee project | Sep-20 | Calidus Resourcs Limited | Novo Resources Corportion | Wester Australia | PFS/Scoping | 19.50 | 100% | 0.42 | 16.33 | 217,933 | 89.48 | 110.72 |
| Trojan, Slate Dam and Clinker Hill | Oct-20 | Black Cat Syndicte limited | Aruma Resources Limited | Wester Australia | Advanced Exploration/ | 0.50 | 100% | 2.12 | 1.69 | 115,125 | 4.34 | 5.37 |
| projects | PFS? | |||||||||||
| Bruno Lewis and Raeside | Dec-23 | Genesis Minerals Limited | Kin Mining NL | Wester Australia | ScopingSdy | 53.50 | 100% | 15.62 | 1.24 | 620,332 | 86.24 | 93.89 |
| Mining tenements at Forrestania gold project |
Oct-23 | Classic Minerals Limited | Hannans limited | Wester Australia | Scoping Study/ Construction Strted |
4.05 | 20% | 8.41 | 1.45 | 392,639 | 10.32 | 11.25 |
| Mount Coolon projec tenements | Oct-22 | Newcrest Operations Ltd | GBM Resources Limited | Queensland | PFS/Scoping | 13.73 | 51% | 6.62 | 1.53 | 325,855 | 42.12 | 52.97 |
| Ml Carrngton project | Feb-21 | Thomson Resources Ltd | Wite Rock Minerals Ltd | New South Wales | PFS/Scoping | 3.50 | 30% | 14.28 | 0.29 | 131,979 | 26.52 | 37.43 |
| Tick Hill stockpiles (dam and | Aug-20 | BIM Metals Pty Ltd | Camaby Resources Limited | Queensland | PFS/Scoping | 4.00 | 100% | 0.41 | 1.35 | 17,83 | 224.28 | 270.05 |
| ROM pad) | ||||||||||||
| Great Wester (M37/54) | Apr-20 | Darlot Mining Company Pty | Terrain Minerals Limited | Wester Australia | PFS/Scoping | 2.50 | 100% | 0.71 | 2.74 | 62,512 | 39.99 | 49.35 |
| Limited | ||||||||||||
| Spargos Reward project | May-20 | Karora Resources Inc | Corona Resources limited | Wester Australia | PFS/Scoping | 6.53 | 100% | 0.94 | 4.34 | 130,581 | 49.97 | 62.52 |
| Goongarrie Lady (M29/420) | Aug-20 | Resource Mining Pty Ltd | Kngwest Resources Limited | Wester Australia | Feasibility Complete | 1.90 | 100% | 0.27 | 2.87 | 24,910 | 76.27 | 91.8 |
| Mount Ida project | Sep-21 | Red Dir Metals Limited | Ora Banda Mining Limited | Wester Australia | Feasibility | 11.00 | 100% | 0.32 | 13.85 | 141,598 | 77.68 | 105.47 |
| Yandan project | Oct-20 | GBM Resources limited | Aeris Resources limited | Queensland | Pre-development | 3.33 | 100% | 21.50 | 0.80 | 552,992 | 6.03 | 7.45 |
| Eureka project | Aug-20 | Warriedar Mining Pty Ltd | Tyranna Resources Limited | Wester Australia | Pre-Production | 1.00 | 100% | 0.76 | 1.76 | 43,043 | 23.23 | 27.97 |
| Sandstone project | Dec-21 | Aurmin Limited | Middle Island Resourcs Limited | Wester Australia | Care and Maintenance | 12.00 | 100% | 22.14 | 1.12 | 799,387 | 15.01 | 19.74 |
| Lorena mine | Jun-22 | Tombola Gold Ltd | Investor group | Queensland | Care and Maintenance | 8.00 | 100% | 0.40 | 4.47 | 58,096 | 137.70 | 173.40 |
| Central Tanami projec | May-21 | Norher Star Resources Ltd | Tanami Gold NL | Norher Terrtor | Care and Maintenance Advanced Exploraton |
150.00 | 10% | 30.84 | 2.76 | 2,741,005 | 5.72 | 75.53 |
| Penny's Find project | Dec-21 | Horzon Minerals Limited | Labyrnth Resourcs Limited | Wester Australia | Care and Maintenace? | 1.50 | 50% | 0.25 | 5.22 | 41,968 | 35.74 | 47.01 |
| linden project | Aug-20 | Linden Gold Alliance Pty Ltd | Anova Metls Limited | Wester Australia | Care and Maintenance | 9.00 | 100% | 0.65 | 6.32 | 131,341 | 68.52 | 82.51 |
| Penny's Find project | Nov-20 | Black Mountin Gold Ltd | Orinex Limited | Wester Australia | Constction? | 5.00 | 50% | 0.25 | 7.04 | 56,133 | 89.07 | 114.32 |
| Coogee project | Jul-20 | Victor Mines Limited | Investor group | Wester Australia | Residual Production | 2.75 | 40% | 0.10 | 3.40 | 10,49 | 262.05 | 328.11 |
| Coogee project | Nov-20 | Victor Mines Limited | Ramelius Resources Limited | Wester Australia | Residual Production | 1.11 | 90% | 0.10 | 3.40 | 10,49 | 105.88 | 135.89 |
| Wile Dam project | Jun-21 | GBM Resources Ld | Washington H Soul Pattinson | South Australia | Residual Production | 2.40 | 100% | 4.60 | 0.70 | 103,525 | 23.18 | 31.77 |
| Mount Carlton gold mine | Oc-21 | Navarre Minerals Ltd | Evolu1ion Mining Ltd | Queensland | Operating (Expansion) | 40.00 | 100% | 9.52 | 1.26 | 387,094 | 103.33 | 141.71 |
| Project | Date | Purchaser | Vendor | Region | Development Stage |
Consideration (100% basis) |
Equity acquired |
Resource (Mt) |
Resource grde |
Resource only |
Resource transacton |
Resource trnsaction |
| **(A$M) ** | (%) | (git Au) | (koz) | multiple (raw) (A$/oz) |
multiple (noralised) (A$/oz) |
|||||||
| Minerl Hill mine | Nov-21 | Kingston Reources Ltd | Quintana MH Holding Co LLC | New South Wales | Operating | 20.00 | 100% | 5.91 | 1.21 | 229,771 | 87.04 | 114.75 |
| Ravenswood mine | Jan-20 | Investor group | Resolute Mining Limited | Queensland | Operating | 300.00 | 100% | 261.50 | 0.70 | 5,885,186 | 50.98 | 73.82 |
| Leonor assets | Apr-23 | Genesis Minerls Limited | St Barbara Limited | Wester Australia | Expansion | 50.00 | 100% | 124.31 | 2.64 | 10,56,032 | 51.12 | 56.22 |
| Cracow mine | Jun-20 | Aers Resources Limited | Evolution Mining Limited | Queensland | Operting | 75.00 | 100% | 2.55 | 4.21 | 345,154 | 217.29 | 284.65 |
| Henl project | Dec-20 | Catalyst Metals Limited | Pybar Mining Serices Pty Ltd | Tasmania | Operating | 19.20 | 100% | 2.40 | 4.30 | 331,795 | 57.87 | 77.26 |
| Red October and Devon project | Dec-21 | Linden Gold Allianc P Ltd | Matsa Resoures Limited | Wester Australia | Operating, | 17.50 | 100% | 1.76 | 3.37 | 190,226 | 92.00 | 120.99 |
| PFS/Scoping | ||||||||||||
| Tropicana mine | Apr-21 | Regis Resources Limited | IGO Limited | Wester Australia | Operating | 3,010.00 | 30% | 145.06 | 1.64 | 7,643,081 | 393.82 | 566.93 |
| Nulla9ine gold project | Dec-23 | Calidus Resources Limited | Novo Resoures Cor | Wester Australia | Care and Maintenance | 45.25 | 100% | 26.73 | 1.66 | 1,423,922 | 31.78 | 3.60 |
Area-based - comparable transactions -Australian gold projects
| Project | Dat | Purchaser | Vendor | Region | Development stge | Tenure tpe |
Considertion (100% basis) (A$M) |
Equit acquired (%) |
Area (km') |
Area multiple (rw) |
Area multiple (noralised) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (A$/km') | (A$/km') | ||||||||||
| Kng prospect | Mar-21 | Image Resourcs NL | Undisclosed seller | Wester Australia | Advanced Eploraton | Pl | 0.83 | 40% | 3.70 | 222,972.97 | 329,263 |
| P25/2597, P25/2688 & P26/470 | Nov-22 | Orange Minerls NL | Rocky Reef Mining Ply Ltd | Wester Australia | Early Eploration | Pl | 0.05 | 100% | 3.22 | 15,527.95 | 19,607 |
| P47/1812 | Dec-22 | Cyclone Metals limited | Stonefeld Developments Ply Ltd | Wester Australia | Early Exploration | Pl | 0.12 | 100% | 0.19 | 631,578.95 | 780,307 |
| Nine prospecing licnces | Aug-23 | Great Boulder Resourcs Limited | Wanbanna Ply Ltd | Wester Australia | Early Eploration | Pl | 0.15 | 80% | 22.00 | 6,818 | 7,581 |
| P15/6314 | Feb-23 | Greenstone Resources limited | British Hill Ply Ltd | Wester Australia | Early Exploraton | PL | 0.04 | 100% | 0.10 | 448,448.45 | 57,974 |
| Central Menzies project | May-21 | Empire Metals Limited | Philips Exploration Ply Ltd | Wester Australia | Early Eploration | PL | 5.13 | 75% | 6.17 | 831,982.71 | 1,148,360 |
| 62 tenements | Oct-23 | Norher Str Resources limited | Horizon Minerals Limited | Wester Australia | Early Eploration | PL | 3.10 | 100% | 101.70 | 30,482 | 33,218 |
| Additional tenure | Sep-22 | IRIS Metls limited | Private Investor-Craig Dixon | Wester Australia | Advanced Exploration | PL, PL | 0.06 | 100% | 3.99 | 15,038 | 19,703 |
| P25/597, P25/2688 & P26/4470 | Nov-22 | Orange Minerals NL | Rocky Reef Mining Ply Ltd | Wester Australia | Early Eploraton | PL | 0.05 | 100% | 3.22 | 15,528 | 19,607 |
| Leeds project | Jan-21 | Ragnar Metals limited | Loki Exploration | Wester Australia | Advanced Exploraton | Pl only | 0.11 | 80% | 3.97 | 28,337.53 | 38,5 |
| Harrier tenement | Mar-21 | Hammer Metals limited | Undisclosed seller | Wester Australia | Early Eploration | El | 0.02 | 100% | 15.41 | 1,297.86 | 1,917 |
| Albion project | Nov-21 | Mt Monger Resources Ltd | Glen Tyrrell Bulldozing Ply Ltd | Wester Australia | Early Exploration | El | 0.09 | 100% | 11.58 | 7,772.02 | 10,246 |
| Golden Star deposit (surrounding | Feb21 | Great Souther Mining limited | GC Eplore Ply Ltd | Wester Australia | Early Exploration | EL | 0.08 | 100% | 412.00 | 182.04 | 257 |
| tenure) | |||||||||||
| Yanda! projec | Jun-21 | Strckland Metals limited | Renegade Exploration Limited | Wester Australia | Early Exploration | EL? | 2.67 | 75% | 320.00 | 8,333.33 | 11,420 |
| E39/2073 | Oc-21 | Wester Mines Group Ltd | Private Investors -Thomas Wlliams and Neelesh Bhasin |
Wester Australia | Early Exploration | EL | 0.12 | 100% | 38.75 | 3,187.10 | 4,371 |
| Oldham Range property | Apr-21 | Merllion Resources Corp. | Undisclosed seller | Wester Australia | Early Eploration | EL | 0.52 | 100% | 147.00 | 3,556.17 | 5,119 |
| E31/1186 | Jul-21 | Ozurum Resources Limited | Revolution Mining Ply Ltd | Wester Australia | Early Exploraton | EL | 0.08 | 100% | 17.83 | 4,206.39 | 5,686 |
| Pinnacle Well projec | Nov-21 | Oz Resourcs limited | Private Investor-Allan Pellegrni | Wester Australia | Early Eploraton | EL | 1.23 | 75% | 95.00 | 12,947.37 | 17,069 |
| Rocky Dam project | Jun-21 | Lycon Resources Ltd | Dreadnought Resources limited | Wester Australia | Advanced Exploraton | EL and EL | 0.10 | 100% | 190.00 | 526.32 | 721 |
| Two tenements | Dec-22 | Equinox Resources Limited | Acme Resources Ply Ltd | Wester Australia | Early Eploration | El | 0.02 | 100% | 220.00 | 74.20 | 92 |
| Karramindie project | Aug-23 | Lithium Resources Investments | Aurumin limied | Wester Australia | Early Exploration | El | 0.50 | 100% | 16.38 | 30,525 | 33,939 |
| Ply Ltd | |||||||||||
| Canegrass tenement | Oc-22 | Zuleika Gold Limited | Olympic Metals Limited | Wester Australia | Early Eploration | EL | 0.50 | 80% | 72.00 | 6,944.44 | 8,732 |
| Kenya project | Jan-21 | Ragnar Metals limited | Jindalee Resources Limited | Wester Australia | Advanced Eploraton | EL | 0.09 | 100% | 7.50 | 12,000.00 | 16,322 |
| Tenements of Krgella and Pinjin Souh |
May-23 | Kalgoorie Gold Mining limited | Undisclosed seller | Wester Australia | EL | 4.07 | 75% | 48.90 | 83,162.92 | 91,249 | |
| Jubilee Well project | Apr-21 | Lodestar Minerls limited | Undisclosed seller | Wester Australia | Early Exploration? | EL | 0.05 | 100% | 20.64 | 2,422.48 | 3,487 |
| Laveron gold projec | Jan-23 | Rincon Resources Limited | Investor Group | Wester Australia | Early Exploration | El | 0.15 | 100% | 32.00 | 4,687.50 | 5,652 |
| Fair Well tenement | Oc-22 | Westar Resourcs limited | Vendors Mining Equites Ply Ltd | Wester Australia | Early Exploraton | El | 0.03 | 100% | 6.00 | 5,208.33 | 6,59 |
| E38/3279 (Ophir Bore) | Apr-21 | Brightstar Resources limited | Private investor- Peter Gianni | Wester Australia | Early Exploration? | EL | 0.05 | 100% | 2.90 | 17,241.38 | 24,820 |
| E38/3438 | Feb21 | Brightstar Resources Limited | Mining Equities Ply Ltd | Wester Australia | Early Eploration | El | 0.20 | 100% | 16.00 | 12,500.00 | 17,63 |
| E39/2040 | Dec-21 | Legacy Iron Ore limited | Investor group | Wester Australia | Early Eploration | EL | 0.10 | 100% | 12.00 | 8,333.33 | 10,960 |
| Comet Well project | Oct-21 | Brightstar Resources limited | Milford Resources Ply Limited | Wester Australia | Early Eploration | EL | 0.76 | 100% | 120.00 | 6,291.67 | 8,629 |
| Project | Date | Purchaser | Vendor | Region | Development stge | Tenure type |
Consideration (100% basis) (A$M) |
Equity acquird (%) |
Area (km') |
Area multiple (raw) (A$/k') |
Area multiple (nonalised) (A$/km') |
| Ninghan projec | Jul-21 | Power Metals Pty Ltd | Legend Resources Pty Ltd | Wester Australia | Early Exploraton | EL | 0.06 | 100% | 29.83 | 2,145.49 | 2,900 |
| Elephant projec | Aug-23 | Tempest Minerals Limited | Mac3 Pty Ltd | Wester Australia | Early Eploration | EL | 0.75 | 80% | 194.00 | 3,866 | 4,298 |
| Murchison projec | Aug-23 | Ora Gold Limited | Sipa Resources Limited | Wester Australia | Early Eploration | EL, EL | 1.40 | 100% | 460.00 | 3,043 | 3,384 |
| Two exploration tenements | Sep-21 | Odyssey Gold Limited | Private investor - Tomas Peter Sander |
Wester Australia | Early Exploraton | EL | 0.06 | 100% | 5.88 | 10,03.01 | 13,623 |
| Garden Gully project | Feb21 | Sipa Resources Limited | Mirmar Resources Limited | Wester Australia | Early Eploraton | EL only | 0.15 | 100% | 207.00 | 724.64 | 1,023 |
| E51/1995 mine | Dec-22 | Great Boulder Resources Limited | Empire Resources Limited | Wester Australia | Early Exploration | EL | 0.01 | 100% | 61.00 | 164 | 203 |
| E59/2584 | Feb-23 | Cooper Metals Limited | DiscovEx Resources Limited | Wester Australia | Early Exploration | EL | 0.05 | 100% | 24.05 | 2,079.00 | 2,540 |
| Ninghan project | Jan-23 | Everest Metals Corporation Ltd | Investor group | Wester Australia | Early Exploration | EL | 0.23 | 100% | 228.00 | 986.84 | 1,190 |
| Gold and Mineral Rights | Sep-22 | E79 Gold Mines Limited | Gascoyne Resources Limited | Wester Australia | Early Eploration | EL | 0.17 | 100% | 122.3 | 1,393 | 1,825 |
| E51/1681 | |||||||||||
| Fairy Well tenement | Oct-22 | Westar Resources Limited | Vendors Mining Equites Pty Ltd | Wester Australia | Early to Advancd Explortion |
EL | 0.03 | 100% | 6.11 | 5,319 | 6,689 |
| E57/1108 | Feb-21 | Alto Metals Limited | Gateway Mining Limited | Wester Australia | Early Exploration | EL | 0.05 | 100% | 115.00 | 434.78 | 614 |
| E57/1140 | Jun-22 | Aurumin Limited | Mining Equities Pty Ltd | Wester Australia | Early Eploration | EL | 0.08 | 100% | 13.84 | 5,419.08 | 6,824 |
| Stnley project | Apr-22 | Ausgold Limited | Cygnus Gold Ltd | Wester Australia | Advanced Eploration | EL | 0.98 | 51% | 161.00 | 6,089.39 | 7,614 |
| Bullabulling project | Jan-22 | Belararox Limited | Investor group | Wester Australia | Early Exploraton | EL | 0.45 | 100% | 48.84 | 9,213.76 | 11,982 |
| Padbur Gold and Ivan Well | Jul-22 | Black Dragon Gold Corp | Undisclosed Seller | Wester Australia | Early Exploration | EL | 0.15 | 100% | 481.00 | 311.85 | 406 |
| projects | |||||||||||
| E28/3135 and E28/3136 | May-23 | Kalgoorie Gold Mining Limited | Private Investor-Mr A Lynch | Wester Australia | Early Eploration | EL | 0.10 | 100% | 9.91 | 10,090.82 | 11,072 |
| E51/1995 mine | Dec-22 | Great Boulder Resources Limited | Empire Resources Limited | Wester Australia | EL | 0.01 | 100% | 621.00 | 16.10 | 20 | |
| E38/3434 | Mar-22 | Brightstar Resources Limited | Regis Resources Ltd | Wester Australia | Early Eploration | EL | 0.01 | 100% | 11.44 | 874.13 | 1,090 |
| M27/158 | Feb-22 | Empire Metls Limited | Maher Mining Contractors Pty Ltd | Wester Australia | Early Eploraton | ML | 0.50 | 100% | 6.43 | 77,760.50 | 98,782 |
| ETT/2637 | Feb-22 | Forrestnia Resources Limited | Undisclosed seller | Wester Australia | Early Exploration | EL | 0.10 | 100% | 11.57 | 8,643.04 | 10,980 |
| Halls Creek project | Feb22 | Hexagon Energy Materials Limied |
Undisclosed Sellers | Wester Australia | Early Exploration | EL | 0.05 | 100% | 12.57 | 3,977.72 | 5,053 |
| Five tenements | Oct-23 | Trek Metls Limited | Undisclosed Seller | Wester Australia | Early Exploration? | El, EL | 1.25 | 100% | 1,183.00 | 1,057 | 1,151 |
| E29/1095 | Feb-22 | Javelin Minerals Limited | Fleet Street Holdings Pty Ltd | Wester Australia | Early Exploraton | EL | 0.05 | 100% | 72.06 | 624.48 | 793 |
| Ironstone Wei, Monarch and Normandy tenements |
Jan-22 | Kin Mining NL | Golden Mile Resources Ltd | Wester Australia | Advanced Exploration, Target Outline |
0 | 1.25 | 60% | 120.00 | 10,416.67 | 13,57 |
| Mt Magnet South project | Mar-22 | Musgrave Minerls Limited | Easter Goldfelds Eploration | Wester Australia | Early Exploration | 0 | 0.50 | 100% | 294.00 | 1,700.68 | 2,121 |
| Albany Fraser project | Feb-22 | Omnia Metals Group Ltd | GT Metals Group Pty Ltd | Wester Australia | Early Exploration | EL | 1.37 | 100% | 222.90 | 6,123.82 | 7,779 |
| E37/1287 & E37/1355 | Jan-22 | Oz Resourcs Limited | Anglo Australian Resources NL | Wester Australia | Early Exploraton | EL | 0.16 | 100% | 63.00 | 2,460.32 | 3,200 |
| Wyloo Dome Gold project | Mar-22 | Woomera Mining limited | Nanjilgardy Resources Pty Ltd | Wester Australia | Early Eploration | 0 | 6.82 | 60% | 378.98 | 17,986.88 | 22,428 |
| E45/6471 | Oct-23 | Infnity Mining Limited | Hawker Geologicl Serices Pty | Wester Australia | Early Exploration | EL | 0.03 | 100% | 15.93 | 1,569 | 1,710 |
| Ltd | |||||||||||
| Three exploration licences | Sep-21 | Brah Resources Limited | Rilukin Holdings Pty Ltd | Wester Australia | Early Exploration | EL | 0.22 | 100% | 50.00 | 4,480.00 | 6,082 |
| Pasclle and Taunton tenements | Sep21 | Greatland Gold pie | Province Resources Ltd | Wester Australia | Early Eploraton | EL | 0.05 | 100% | 75.14 | 665.42 | 903 |
| Project | Dat | Purchaser | Vendor | Region | Development stge | Tenure | Considertion | Equity | Area | Area | Area |
| type | (100% basis) (A$M) |
acquired (%) |
(km') | multiple (raw) (A$/km') |
multiple (noralised) (A$/km') |
||||||
| Mumbakine Well projec | May-22 | Capricr Metals Ltd | Gascoyne Resources Ltd | Wester Australia | Advanced Exploration | EL | 1.25 | 100% | 361.00 | 3,462.60 | 4,346 |
| 7 exploration tenements | Dec-23 | Peregrne Gold Limned | F orescue Ltd | Wester Australia | Earty Exploration | EL | 0.10 | 100% | 99.79 | 1,002 | 1,091 |
| E45/5484 | Jan-21 | Trek Metls Limned | Redstone Metls Pty Ltd (50%) &Wester Australia Territor Prospecting Pty Ltd |
Early Eploration | EL | 0.10 | 100% | 106.47 | 962.71 | 1,309 | |
| (50%) | |||||||||||
| E47/3373 | Apr-21 | Undisclosed buyer | Aemis Resources Limited | Wester Australia | Early Eploration? | EL | 0.50 | 100% | 63.26 | 7,903.89 | 11,378 |
| Mt Ceclia project | Dec-21 | Rio Tinto Group | West Wt Mining Limned | Wester Australia | Early Exploraton | EL | 8.14 | 51% | 225.00 | 36,165.58 | 47,56 |
| P30/1126 | Jan-21 | Vking Mines Limned | Australia Menzies Emerald Pty | Wester Australia | Early Eploraton | PL | 0.02 | 100% | 1.80 | 11,111.11 | 15,113 |
| Lid | |||||||||||
| P59/088 and P59/2089 | Mar-21 | Firefly Resources Limited | Private investor - Jason Gill | Wester Australia | Early Eploration | PL | 0.05 | 100% | 2.12 | 23,584.91 | 34,828 |
| Julimar Norh projec | Jun-21 | Tambourah Metals Limned | Baracus Pty Ltd | Wester Australia | Early Eploration | EL&EL | 1.16 | 80% | 508.28 | 2,280.36 | 3,125 |
| ETT/691 | Aug-23 | Golden Hore Minerals Limited | Prvate Investors -Veron & | Wester Australia | EL | 3.00 | 10% | 116.00 | 25,862.07 | 28,755 | |
| McClaren | |||||||||||
| Polelle and Wanganui project | Nov-23 | Great Boulder Resources Limited | Castle Minerals Limited | Wester Australia | Early Exploration | EL | 0.53 | 75% | 162.90 | 3,274 | 3,530 |
| Ennuin West E77/2652 | Mar-22 | Enterprise Metals Limited | NXT1 Pty Ltd | Wester Australia | Early Exploration | EL | 0.13 | 100% | 103.00 | 1,213.59 | 1,513 |
| Bullfinch projec | Jun-23 | Altan Rio Minerals Limied | Torque Metals Limited | Wester Australia | Early Eploration | EL, EL | 0.75 | 100% | 556.00 | 1,348.92 | 1,536 |
| Souher Cross Norh projec | Dec-22 | An Rio Minerals Limned | Surveyor Resources Pty Lid | Wester Australia | Early Eploration | EL | 5.44 | 20% | 270.00 | 20,153.78 | 24,900 |
| 3 tenements and 1 gold right | Aug-22 | Australian Silic Quar Group | Netley Minerals Pty Ltd | Wester Australia | Early Eploraton | El, EL | 0.35 | 100% | 378.00 | 925.93 | 1,201 |
| Ltd | |||||||||||
| Becher projec | Jun-23 | De Grey Mining Limned | Novo Resources Corp | Wester Australia | Early Eploraton | EL's? | 50.00 | 50% | 1,034.00 | 48,355.90 | 55,055 |
| Little Gap Well and Mt Opal projecs |
May-23 | Deser Metls Limited | Diversifed Asset Holdings Pty LtdWester Australia | Early Exploraton | EL | 0.42 | 60% | 180.3 | 2,310 | 2,535 | |
| E51/1766 | Jan-23 | Everest Metals Corporation Ltd | MSCS Infastructure Pty Ltd | Wester Australia | Early Eploraton | EL | 3.14 | 51% | 36.99 | 84,813.60 | 102,263 |
| E51/170 | Jan-23 | Everest Metals Corporation Lid | MSCS Infrastructure Pty Lid | Wester Australia | Early Eploraton | EL | 0.61 | 51% | 8.77 | 69,309.37 | 83,569 |
| Bald Hill/Foghor | Nov-22 | Black Cat Syndicate Limned | Duketon Mining Limned | Wester Australia | Early Exploration | EL | 0.48 | 100% | 203.00 | 2,365 | 2,986 |
| Mount Lucky project | Jul-22 | Mindax Limited | Undisclosed Seller | Wester Australia | Early Exploration | EL | 0.08 | 100% | 19.74 | 4,053 | 5,281 |
| Louise project and three exploration licnce applictons |
Aug-22 | Victor Goldfelds Limited | Mining Equities Pty Ltd | Wester Australia | Early Exploration | EL | 0.31 | 100% | 75.85 | 4,113 | 5,337 |
| Anketell project | Aug-22 | Wishbone Gold Pie | Undisclosed Seller | Wester Australia | Early Exploraton | EL | 0.67 | 100% | 10.00 | 67,49 | 87,521 |
| Canegrass tenement | Oct-22 | Zuleika Gold Limited | Olympia Metals Limited | Wester Australia | Exploraton | EL | 0.50 | 80% | 72.00 | 6,944 | 8,732 |
| Laveron gold projec | Jan-23 | Rincon Resources Limited | Investor Group | Wester Australia | Exploration | EL | 0.15 | 100% | 32.00 | 4,688 | 5,652 |
| Smokebush gold project | Dec-22 | Terrain Minerals Limited | Wester Australia | Early Exploration | EL | 0.10 | 20% | 2.99 | 33,445 | 41,321 | |
| Tenure South of Batler gold mine and Blackboume mine |
Aug-23 | Golden Hore Minerals Limited | Private Investors - Veron Strange and Kym McClaren |
Wester Australia | EL, PL | 0.09 | 100% | 4.40 | 20,45.55 | 22,742 | |
| 5 tenements | Feb23 | Tempest Minerals Limited | Private Investor- Darren Mculay |
Wester Australia | Early Eploration | EL, PL, EL | 0.05 | 100% | 20.82 | 2,160.89 | 2,640 |
| Smokebush gold project | Dec-22 | Terrain Minerals Limited | Private Investor-Wat-Buter | Wester Australia | Early Exploration | EL, PL | 0.35 | 20% | 17.32 | 20,207.85 | 24,967 |
| Kanowna East, Emu Lake and Fraser South project |
May-23 | Metal Hawk Limned | 'IGO Limited | Wester Australia | Early to Advanced Explortion |
EL, PL | 0.51 | 51% | 377.3 | 1,351.05 | 1,482 |
| Smokebush gold projec | Dec-22 | Terrain Minerals Limned | Private Investor - Wats-Butler | Wester Australia | Early Exploraton | EL, PL | 0.35 | 20% | 12.53 | 27,933 | 34,511 |
| Project | Date | Purchaser | Vendor | Region | Development stge | Tenure tpe |
Considertion (100% basis) (A$M) |
Equity acquired (%) |
Area (km') |
Area multiple (raw) |
Ara multiple (noralised) |
| (A$1km') | (A$/km') | ||||||||||
| Xanadu | Jun-21 | Platina Resources Limited | Investor group | Wester Australia | Early to advanced Explortion |
El and PL | 1.02 | 100% | 498.00 | 2,045.92 | 2,804 |
| Four tenement and cmp | Mar-22 | Oz Resourcs Limited | United Mines Pty Ltd | Wester Australia | Early to Advanced | EL, PL | 0.19 | 100% | 7.62 | 24,713.91 | 30,816 |
| infrastructure | Exploration | ||||||||||
| E37/1234, E37/1235 and 37/8573 | Sep23 | United Mines Pty Ltd | Oz Resources Limited | Wester Australia | Early to Advanced | EL, PL | 0.16 | 100% | 7.62 | 20,682 | 22,832 |
| Exploration | |||||||||||
| Niagara project | Fel-22 | RegenerS Resources NL | GTI Resources Ltd | Wester Australia | Early to Advanced | EL, PL | 1.15 | 100% | 33.31 | 34,527.28 | 43,861 |
| Exploration | |||||||||||
| Cuddingwarr and Big Bell South projecs |
Jul-21 | Capric Resourcs Limited | Golden Stte Mining Limited | Wester Australia | Early Exploration | EL and PL? | 0.94 | 80% | 133.00 | 7,048.87 | 9,527 |
| Austin project | Apr-21 | Silver City Minerals Limited | Gardner Mining Pty Ltd | western Austalia | Early Exploration | ML, PL and | 5.63 | 80% | 175.00 | 32,142.86 | 46,271 |
| EL | |||||||||||
| Yandicoogina projec | May-23 | L W Resources Pty Ltd | Raiden Resources Limited | Wester Australia | Early Exploration | EL, ML | 0.18 | 90% | 88.81 | 2,001.79 | 2,196 |
| Birthday mine/Ennuin tenemenVNeweld East projec |
Aug-23 | Golden Hore Minerals Limited | Private Investors - Veron Stange and Kym McClaren |
Wester Australia | ML, PL, EL | 0.43 | 100% | 96.40 | 4,408.71 | 4,902 | |
| 6 Pls and 2 Mls | May-23 | Nelson Resourcs Limited | Rock Mining Australia Pty Ltd | Wester Australia | Early Exploraton | PL, ML | 0.39 | 100% | 8.41 | 45,778.83 | 50,230 |
| Phoenix and Kangaroo Hill projects |
Aug-22 | Greenstone Resources Limited | Horizon Minerals Limited | Wester Australia | Advanced Exploration | ML, PL | 0.30 | 100% | 3.53 | 84,986 | 110,276 |
| Mangaroon (E09/2290, M091146, | Sep22 | Dreadnought Resources Limited | Undisclosed seller | Wester Australia | Earty Exploration | EL, ML | 2.70 | 100% | 76.80 | 35,157 | 46,066 |
| M09/147 and M09/175) | |||||||||||
| Warriedar gold project | Aug-22 | Anova Metals Limited | Red Dir Metals Limited | Wester Australia | Early to Advanced Explortion |
EL, PL, ML | 1.20 | 100% | 68.00 | 17,647 | 22,899 |
| Mt Dimer mining tenement | Oct-23 | Beacon Minerals Limited | Aurumin Limited | Wester Australia | Reseres | ML, PL | 3.50 | 100% | 20.80 | 168,284 | 183,389 |
| Development | |||||||||||
| Geko tenements | Oct-22 | Beacon Minerals Limited | Geko Pit Pty Ltd | Wester Australia | Operating? Care and | ML | 10.75 | 100% | 9.97 | 1,355,826 | |
| Maintenance? | 1,078,234.70 | ||||||||||
| Mangaroon (M09/174) | Sep22 | Dreadnought Resources Limited | Undisclosed seller | Wester Australia | Early Exploration | ML | 0.20 | 100% | 0.20 | 965,825 | 1,265,499 |
| Non-Core Lady Ida tenements | Mar-23 | Investor group | Ora Banda Mining Limited | Wester Australia | Advanced | MLs | 10.00 | 100% | 29.71 | 336,587.01 | 386,601 |
| Exploration? | |||||||||||
| M57/352 | Nov-22 | Aurumin Limited | Westr Resources Limited | Wester Australia | Target Outline | ML | 0.17 | 100% | 1.14 | 147,368 | 186,085 |
| M571352 | Nov-22 | Aurumin Limited | Westr Resourcs Limited | Wester Australia | Early Eploration | ML | 0.17 | 100% | 1.14 | 147,368.42 | 186,085 |
| Geko tenement | Oc-22 | Beacon Minerls Limited | Geko Pit Pty Ltd | Wester Australia | Care and | ML | 7.75 | 100% | 9.97 | 777,332.00 | 977,456 |
| Maintenance | |||||||||||
| M29/417 and M29/418 | Nov-21 | Zuleika Gold Limited | Wngstr Investment Pty Ltd | Wester Australia | Early Exploraton? | ML | 0.01 | 100% | 16.52 | 605.33 | 798 |
| Mount Hope ML90240 | Apr-22 | Camaby Resources Limited | Integrated Global Resourcs | Queensland | Early Exploration | ML | 2.00 | 100% | 0.50 | 4,000,000 | 5,001,316 |
| ML5571 & ML5572 of Gunpowder Creek proect |
Nov-22 | Coolabah Metals Limited | Investor Group | Queensland | Early to Advanced? | ML | 0.04 | 100% | 0.08 | 500,000 | 631,358 |
| ML5571 & ML5572 of Gunpowder | Nov-22 | Coolabah Metals Limited | Investor Group | Queensland | Earty Exploration | ML | 0.10 | 100% | 0.04 | 2,425,000 | 3,062,088 |
| Creek project | |||||||||||
| 263 hectres | Apr-21 | Investor group | Undisclosed sellers | Victora | Advanced Exploration | RL, EL | 0.78 | 100% | 2.63 | 294,677 | 424,204 |
| Laura projec (PL615) | Jul-23 | Souther Cross Gold Ltd | Investor Group | Victoria | Early Exploration | PL | 0.30 | 100% | 0.05 | 6,009,615 | 6,822,38 |
| Three tenements | Mar-21 | Ballymore Resources Ltd | Undisclosed seller | Queensland | Care and | EPM, ML | 0.49 | 100% | 6.42 | 76,324 | 112,707 |
| Maintenance, Explortion |
|||||||||||
| Moline project | Mar-22 | Sovereign Metalluricl Ply Ltd | PNX Metals Ltd | Norher Territor | Advanced Eploration | EL, ML | 2.25 | 100% | 298.0 | 7,549 | 9,414 |
| Project | Date | Purchaser | Vendor | Region | Development stge | Tenure | Consideration | Equity | Area | Area | Area |
| type | (100% basis) (A$M) |
acquired (%) |
(km') | multiple (raw) (A$/km') |
multiple (noralised) (A$/km') |
||||||
| Feni tenement | Sep-22 | DeSoto Resources Limited | Bacchus Resources Pl Ltd | Norhen Territor | Early Exploration | EL | 0.80 | 100% | 3 .60 | 2,322 | 3,02 |
| Fenix tenement | Sep22 | DeSoto Resources Limited | Bacchus Resources Pl Ltd | Norher Territor | Earty Exploraton | EL, EL | 0.80 | 100% | 1,887.00 | 424 | 555 |
| Monza project | Nov-21 | Newmont Corp | Prodigy Gold NL | Norher Territor | Advanced Eploration | EL | 11.76 | 51% | 3,000.00 | 3,922 | 5,170 |
| EL23888 & EL8083 in Reynolds | Feb-24 | iT ech Energy Ply Ltd | Prodigy Gold NL | Norher Territory | Earty Exploraton | EL | 0.06 | 100% | 257.61 | 233 | 247 |
| Range project | |||||||||||
| EL23655 | Feb-24 | iT ech Energy Ply Ltd | Prodigy Gold NL | Norher Teritor | Earty Exploraton | EL | 0.05 | 80% | 117.8 | 424 | 450 |
| Georgina IOCG projec | Jun-22 | Astro Resources NL | Greenvale Mining Ltd | Norther Territory | Explorton | EL | 5.75 | 80% | 4,522.80 | 1,271 | 1,601 |
| Box Hole, Edwards Creek and | Jan-22 | MetalsGrove Mining Limited | Shree Minerals Ltd | Norher Territor | Earty to Advanced | EL | 2.00 | 50% | 380.00 | 5,263 | 6,845 |
| Bruce projects | Exploration | ||||||||||
| Wld Horse project | Jun-21 | Newmont Corp | Terramin Australia Ltd | South Australia | Early Exploration | EL | 5.88 | 51% | 462.00 | 12,732 | 17,48 |
| EL531 | Mar-22 | Tolu Minerals Limited | Lanthanein Resources Limited | South Austalia | Earty Eploration? | EL | 2.00 | 100% | 223.00 | 8,969 | 11,183 |
| Panama Hat and Crow Mountin projecs |
Nov-21 | EQ Resources Ld | Sozo Resources Ply Ltd | New South Wales | Exploration | EL | 1.73 | 49% | 67.05 | 25,872 | 34,107 |
| Avondale project | Jun-21 | Golden Plains Rsrc Ply Ltd | Rimfre Pacific Mining NL | New South Wales | Advanced Exploration | EL | 6.25 | 40% | 546.00 | 11,447 | 15,686 |
| Trilby and Lome properties | Jun-21 | JNC Resources Inc | Aussie Precious Metls Corp | New South Wales | Earty Exploration | EL | 0.56 | 100% | 317.50 | 1,769 | 2,424 |
| EL8807 and EL6378 | Aug-22 | Cosmos Exploration Limited | Investor group | New South Wles | Earty Exploration | EL | 0.14 | 80% | 74.50 | 1,913 | 2,482 |
| Barellan tenement | Jan-21 | Thomson Resourcs Limited | Investor group | New South Wales | Earty Eplorton | 0 | 0.39 | 100% | 70.00 | 5,571 | 7,578 |
| Two tenements | Mar-23 | Alkane Resources Limited | Sandfre Resources Limited | New South Wales | Earty Explorton | EL | 1.90 | 100% | 299.00 | 6,355 | 7,299 |
| Bauloora project | Apr-23 | Newmont Eploration Ply Ltd | Legacy Minerals Holdin9s Limited | New South Wales | Early Eploration | EL | 9.80 | 51% | 330.00 | 29,709 | 32,677 |
| Spur project | Oct-23 | Bater Minerals Limited | Yanbulla Mining Ply Ltd | New South Wales | Early Eploration | EL | 0.38 | 100% | 45.64 | 8,217 | 8,955 |
| Jackadger projec | May-22 | T echGen Metals Ltd | Investor group | New South Wales | Early Exploration | EL | 0.13 | 100% | 32.00 | 4,164 | 5,227 |
| EL9214 and EL9076 | Oct-21 | Orange Minerals NL | Bullseye Gold Ply Ltd | New South Wales | Early Exploration | EL | 0.05 | 100% | 320.35 | 159 | 218 |
| Queens Project | Mar-23 | Novo Resources Corp | Kalamazoo Resources Limited | Victora | Early Exploration | EL | 3.00 | 50% | 15.60 | 192,308 | 220,883 |
| Berringa project | Jul-22 | Red Rock Resources pie | Shen Yao Holdings Ltd | Victora | Early Eploration | EL | 0.15 | 100% | 2.88 | 52,083 | 67,86 |
| Mt Piper gold project | Jul-22 | Kalamazoo Resources Limited | Coda Minerals Ltd | Victora | Early Exploration | EL,EL | 0.57 | 100% | 1,609.00 | 352 | 459 |
| Blackwood project | Sep23 | Currawong Resources Ply Ltd | Cauldron Energy Limited | Victora | Early to Advanced | EL, PL | 0.59 | 51% | 23.47 | 25,063 | 27,668 |
| Exploration | |||||||||||
| Georgetown, Perpendicular Peak & Fier Creek |
Sep22 | Emu NL | Rugby Resources Ltd | Queensland | Early Exploraton | EL | 1.50 | 50% | 850.00 | 1,765 | 2,312 |
| Hill 212 project | Mar-22 | Far East Gold Limited | Ellenkay Gold Ply Ltd | Queensland | Advanced Exploration | EPM | 1.84 | 49% | 19.20 | 95,663 | 119,285 |
| Mt Clermont projec | Mar-21 | Australasian Metls Ltd | Impact Minerals Ltd | Queensland | Advanced Eploration | EPM | 0.11 | 100% | 69.60 | 1,580 | 2,334 |
| EPM26912 | Feb-21 | Ballymore Resources Ltd | Undisclosed seller | Queensland | Early Exploration | EPM | 0.03 | 100% | 186.15 | 134 | 190 |
| Ravenswood project | Nov-21 | Ballymore Resources Ltd | ActvEXLtd | Queensland | Early Eploration | EPM | 0.88 | 49% | 309.57 | 2,835 | 3,737 |
| Two projects | Apr-22 | Merllion Resources Corp | Essex Minerls Inc | Queensland | Early to Advanced | EL | 3.28 | 25% | 104.00 | 31,548 | 39,45 |
| Exploration | |||||||||||
| Pyrmid project | Mar-21 | Minotaur Exploration Ld | Avira Resources Ltd | Queensland | Advanced Exploration | EPM | 0.30 | 100% | 150.00 | 2,000 | 2,953 |
| EPM17850 | Jun-21 | GBM Resources Ltd | Native Mineral Rsr Hldgs Ltd | Queensland | Early Exploration | EPM | 0.24 | 100% | 41.60 | 5,649 | 7,741 |
| Project | Dat | Purchaser | Vendor | Region | Development stge | Tenure type |
Consideration (100% basis) (ASM) |
Equity acquired (%) |
Ara (km') |
Area multlple (raw) |
Ara multlple (nonalised) |
| (AS/km') | (AS/km') | ||||||||||
| Etheridge projec | Dec-21 | Rubix Resources Ltd | Undisclosed seller | Queensland | Early to Advanced Explorton |
EPM | 0.20 | 100% | 48.70 | 4,107 | 5,401 |
| Titan project | Jan-22 | Queensland Gold Hills Corp | Prvate Investor- Warick | Queensland | Early Exploration | EL | 0.12 | 100% | 90.00 | 1,303 | 1,695 |
| Anderson | |||||||||||
| Blue Grass Creek project | Mar-22 | Far East Gold Limited | Ellenkay Gold Pty Ltd | Queensland | Early Eploration | EPM | 0.38 | 49% | 22.40 | 17,128 | 21,358 |
| Four new licences | Nov-23 | Trigg Minerals Limited | Boadica Resources Ld | Queensland | Early Eploration | EPM | 0.36 | 90% | 351.70 | 1,011 | 1,090 |
| Specimen Hill projec | Feb24 | Amerod Resourcs Pty Lim�ed | Tectonic Gold Pie | Queensland | Early Eploration | EL, MDL | 1.96 | 51% | 258.13 | 7,596 | 8,062 |
| Blue Mountain projec | Apr-23 | Lux Exploration Pty Lim�ed | Panther Metls PLC | Queensland | Early Eploration | EL | 1.24 | 30% | 25.00 | 49,418 | 54,356 |
Area-based - comparable transactions -Australian copper projects
| Project | Date | Purchaser | Vendor | Region | Tenure tpe |
Considerton (100% basis) {A$M) |
Equity acquired (%) |
Area {k') |
Area multple (raw) (A$/km') |
Area multple (noralised) (A$/k') |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Three sub-blocks at Mt Hope | Apr-24 | Camaby Resources Limited | Hammer Metls Limited | Queensland | EPM | 17.65 | 51.00% | 9.3 | 1,897,533.2 | 1,897,533.2 |
| South tenement | ||||||||||
| Mt Clar West project | Mar-22 | Far East Gold Limited | Ellenkay Gold Pty Limited | Queensland | EPM | 1.04 | 49.00% | 19.1 | 54,436.0 | 67,877.6 |
| Top Camp project | Mar-21 | Mayfir Cororations Group Pty | Orion Metals Limited | Queensland | ML | 0.50 | 100.00% | 4.1 | 123,243.8 | 181,993.5 |
| Ltd | ||||||||||
| 104 sub-blocks | Jun-22 | Glencore pie | Austral Resourcs Australia Ltd | Queensland | EPM | 10.43 | 35.00% | 330.0 | 31,601.7 | 39,793.9 |
| Porolio of project | May-21 | Comet Resources Limited | Bath Resources Pty Ltd | Norher Territor | EL | 0.75 | 100.00% | 258.0 | 2,898.4 | 4,000.6 |
| Bethanga projec | Dec-21 | Nexus Minerals Limited | Undisclosed seller | Vctoria | EL | 0.85 | 100.00% | 194.0 | 4,355.7 | 5,728.4 |
| Russell project | Jun-21 | Bater Minerals Limited | iCopper Pty Ltd | Wester Australia | EL | 2.60 | 100.00% | 258.0 | 10,077.5 | 13,809.9 |
| Oldham Range propery | Jul-21 | Merllion Resources Corp | Undisclosed seller | Wester Australia | EL | 0.24 | 100.00% | 147.0 | 1,602.5 | 2,165.9 |
| Five tenements | Dec-23 | Black Cat Syndicte Limited | Kingfsher Mining Limited | Wester Australia | EL | 0.56 | 100.00% | 700.0 | 800.0 | 870.9 |
| E?0/542 | Mar-23 | Caravel Minerals Limited | Enegex Limited | Wester Austrlia | EL | 0.33 | 100.00% | 82.4 | 3,944.2 | 4,530.2 |
| Mogul copper-zinc VMS project | Sep-22 | Kogi Iron Limited | Mining Equities Pty Ltd | Wester Australia | EL | 0.01 | 100.00% | 44.5 | 194.1 | 254.3 |
| Two exploration licences | Apr-23 | Lodestar Minerals Limited | Tripod Resources Pty Ltd | Wester Australia | EL | 0.26 | 100.00% | 268.0 | 987.6 | 1,086.3 |
| Harbut Range project | Sep-22 | Rio Tinto Exploration Pty Limited | TechGen Metals Ltd | Wester Australia | EL | 3.75 | 80.00% | 376.0 | 9,973.4 | 13,067.9 |
| E51/2069 | Jul-23 | Star Minerals Limited | Drillabit Proprietar Limited | Wester Australia | EL | 0.11 | 100.00% | 97.5 | 1,08.9 | 1,231.6 |
| E523635 | Jul-23 | Star Minerals Limited | Pinny Pty Ltd | Wester Australia | EL | 0.22 | 100.00% | 216.0 | 1,027.8 | 1,166.8 |
| Koojan propery | Jan-21 | Liontown Resources Limited | Lachlan Star Limited | Wester Austalia | EL | 3.33 | 30.00% | 601.0 | 5,56.3 | 7,5.0 |
| Ravenswood West project | Mar-21 | X Gold Pty Limited | Stavely Minerals Limited | Queensland | EL | 0.41 | 100.00% | 366.0 | 1,132.5 | 1,672.4 |
| Neutral Junction Project (Donkey | Mar-22 | Easter Metls Limited | Bowgan Minerals Ltd | Norther Territor | EL | 0.15 | 100.00% | 503.8 | 305.6 | 381.0 |
| Creek, Home of Bullion, Neutral | ||||||||||
| Junction, Adnera, Ooralingie, | ||||||||||
| Buggy Camp) | ||||||||||
| Carrara project | Jun-22 | South32 Limited | Encounter Resources Limited | Norther Territor | EL | 16.67 | 60.00% | 2,435.4 | 6,843.4 | 8,617.4 |
| Jessica project | Jun-22 | South32 Limited | Encounter Resources Limited | Norther Territor | EL | 25.00 | 60.00% | 6,300.0 | 3,968.3 | 4,997.0 |
| EPM26435 | Jun-22 | Austral Resources Australia Ltd | Glencore pie | Queensland | EPM | 3.08 | 65.00% | 116.0 | 26,525.2 | 33,401.4 |
| Mayfeld project | Jun-22 | C29 Metals Limited | GBM Resources Limited | Queensland | EPM | 0.50 | 100.00% | 91.0 | 5,494.5 | 6,918.9 |
| EPM27537 | Mar-22 | Cooper Metls Limited | Nuclear Energy Pty Ltd | Queensland | EPM | 0.05 | 100.00% | 275.0 | 181.8 | 226.7 |
| Beefood project | Aug-21 | R3D Resourcs Limited | Investor group | Queensland | EPM | 0.72 | 100.00% | 65.3 | 11,060.5 | 14,890.8 |
| Templeton & Mingera EPMS | Feb21 | South32 Limited | Pegmont Mines Limited | Queensland | EL | 1.00 | 100.00% | 139.0 | 7,194.2 | 10,154.3 |
| Piteld project, Stavely project, Walton projec |
Apr-22 | Empire Metals Limited | Centur Minerals Pty Ltd | Wester Australia; Victoria |
EL | 0.93 | 70.00% | 1,718.5 | 541.9 | 677.5 |
| Black Range project | Feb-21 | Resource Base Limited | Navarre Minerals Limited | Vctoria | EL | 1.20 | 100.00% | 124.0 | 9,677.4 | 13,659.1 |
| Non-old mineral right on | Mar-22 | Rio Tinto Group | Twenty Seven C. Limited | Wester Australia | EL | 6.28 | 80.00% | 221.0 | 28,421.9 | 35,440.0 |
| E57/1134 | ||||||||||
| Clermont project | Aug-21 | Metallica Minerals Limited | Diatreme Resources Limited | Queensland | EPM | 1.20 | 25.00% | 240.0 | 5,000.0 | 6,731.5 |
| 4 subblocks | Dec-22 | Revolver Resources Holdings Ltd | Colt Resources Pty Ld | Queensland | EPM | 0.08 | 50.00% | 13.0 | 6,153.8 | 7,603.0 |
| Project | Date | Purchaser | Vendor | Region | Tenure | Consideraton | Equit | Area | Area | Area |
| tpe | (100% basis) (A$M) |
acquired (%) |
(km') | multiple (rw) (A$/km') |
multiple (noralised) (A$/k') |
|||||
| EPM28005 and EPM28063 | Jun-23 | Bindi Metls Limited | Undisclosed seller | Queensland | EPM | 0.02 | 100.00% | 393.7 | 58.9 | 67.1 |
| Palmer River projec | Oct-22 | Revolver Resources Holdings Ltd | Great Souther Mining Limited | Queensland | EPM | 1.00 | 100.00% | 411.8 | 2,428.3 | 3,053.5 |
| Three sub-blocks at Mt Hope | Apr-24 | Camaby Resources Limited | Hammer Metls Limited | Queensland | EPM | 17.65 | 51.00% | 9.3 | 1,897,533.2 | 1,897,533.2 |
| South tenement | ||||||||||
| EPM19125 | Aug-22 | Cooper Metals Limited | Ardmore Resources Limited | Queensland | EPM | 0.25 | 100.00% | 68.0 | 3,677.4 | 4,771.7 |
| EPM19686 | Sep-23 | Cooper Metls Limited | Spinifx Rural Management Pty | Queensland | EPM | 0.08 | 100.00% | 35.4 | 2,287.5 | 2,525.2 |
| Ltd | ||||||||||
| Horseshoe tenements | Jan-21 | Kopore Metls Limited | Horseshoe Metls Limited | Wester Australia | El, PL, ML | 2.84 | 51.00% | 32.4 | 87,751.1 | 119,357.2 |
| Base and precious metal right | Feb22 | Firt Quantum Minerls Ltd | Boss Energy Limited | South Austalia | EL&ML | 12.21 | 51.00% | 2,595.0 | 4,703.6 | 5,975.2 |
| within the Honeymoon project | ||||||||||
| Millers Creek projec | Jul-23 | Bluetop Enterprises Pty Ltd | NT Minerals Limited | South Austalia | EL | 1.25 | 80.00% | 1,110.0 | 1,126.1 | 1,278.4 |
| Mabel Creek IOCG project | Jan-23 | Talisman Mining Limited | First Au Limited | South Australia | EL | 0.30 | 100.00% | 1,048.0 | 286.3 | 345.2 |
| Peake and Denison project | Dec-21 | OZ Minerals Limited | Minotaur Exploration Limited | South Australia | El | 9.55 | 51.00% | 2,500.0 | 3,819.1 | 5,022.7 |
| Ashburon project | Dec-23 | Austin Metals Limited | Gardner Mining Pty Ltd | Wester Australia | EL | 0.20 | 100.00% | 510.0 | 392.2 | 426.9 |
| East Tennant project | May-23 | Middle Island Resources Limited | Strategic Energy Resources | Norher Terrtor | EL | 0.64 | 100.00% | 1,319.0 | 484.0 | 531.1 |
| Limited | ||||||||||
| Wongan Hills South project | Nov-21 | Tambourah Metals Limited | Baracus Pty Ltd | Wester Australia | EL | 0.25 | 80.00% | 381.5 | 655.3 | 863.9 |
| Wester Wood projec | Oct-23 | Aranjin Resources Ltd | Wester Wood Capital Pty Ltd | New South Wales | EL | 0.28 | 80.00% | 516.5 | 544.5 | 593.4 |
| EL8907 | Apr-22 | Talisman Mining Limited | Rio Tinto Group | New South Wales | EL | 0.01 | 100.00% | 1,043.0 | 9.6 | 12.0 |
| Koonenberr projec | Feb21 | Odin Metals Limited | Peel Mining Limited | New South Wales | EL | 1.00 | 100.00% | 2,600.0 | 384.6 | 542.9 |
| Six exploration licnces | Jul-23 | Kincora Copper Limited | RareX Limited | New South Wales | EL | 7.77 | 35.00% | 47.9 | 17,352.0 | 19,698.8 |
| Porers Mount project | Sep-23 | Rimfre Pacifc Mining Limited | Plutonic Limited | New South Wales | EL | 0.03 | 100.00% | 72.0 | 347.2 | 383.3 |
| Glenlogan project | Jan-24 | S2 Resources Ltd | Legacy Minerals Holdings Limited | New South Wales | EL | 3.07 | 70.00% | 85.0 | 36,13.5 | 38,843.1 |
| Iron Duke project | Sep-23 | Sky Metals Limited | Metarock Group Limited | New South Wales | EL | 0.27 | 100.00% | 14.5 | 18,916.4 | 20,882.3 |
Area-based - comparable transactions - Fijian copper-gold projects
| Project | Date | Purchaser | Vendor | Region | Consideration (100% basis) (A$M) |
Equity acquired (%) |
Area (km') |
Area multiple (raw) |
Area multiple (nonalised) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (A$/km') | (A$/km') | ||||||||
| Oyadao South licnce | 42535 | JOGMEC | Angkor Gold Cororation | R0tn0kiri | 7.96 | 51.00% | 235.0 | 33,859.3 | 57,246.0 |
| Oyadao Norh concession | 42381 | Mesco Gold Ltd | Angkor Gold Cororation | R0tn0kiri | 2.09 | 85.00% | 222.0 | 9,421.6 | 18,518.8 |
| EL 2306 (Abundance Valley) | 42934 | Gold Mountin Limited | Kher Eng Hock & Sons (PNG) | Enga Province | 7.54 | 70.00% | 328.0 | 23,001.1 | 40,131.8 |
| Limited | |||||||||
| Kean Nheak property | 42928 | Emerld Resources NL | Angkor Gold Cororation | M0nd6I Kiri | 5.53 | 51.00% | 189.0 | 29,261.3 | 51,05.5 |
| E2527 | 44362 | Kainantu Resourcs Ltd | Niuminco Group Limited | EastSepik | 0.50 | 100.00% | 94.0 | 5,35.8 | 6,288.3 |
| Tinga Valley propery | 45397 | Great Pacifc Gold Corp. | Tinga Valley Copper & Gold | 17.60 | 100.00% | 347.0 | 50,723.7 | 50,723.7 | |
| Corp. | |||||||||
| May River project | 45019 | Kainantu Resourcs Ltd | Undisclosed Sellers | Sandaun (West | 1.77 | 90.00% | 890.0 | 1,988.2 | 2,145.6 |
| Sepik) | |||||||||
| Andewa EL2461 | 42853 | Frontier Resourcs Limited | WB Resources Limited | West New Britain | 0.09 | 90.00% | 147.0 | 599.8 | 1,021.7 |
| Kuta Ridge project | 43528 | Orefnder Resources Inc. | Shareholder of Kuta Ridge Explortion Inc. |
1.46 | 40.00% | 89.0 | 16,460.2 | 27,305.1 | |
| EL2306 (Abundance Valley) | 42934 | Gold Mountin Limited | Kher Eng Hock & Sons (PNG) | Enga | 6.78 | 70.00% | 328.0 | 20,682.6 | 36,086.6 |
| Limited | |||||||||
| El Paso Exploration Penmit 009 | 42249 | J IWON Resource Corp. | Red Mountain Mining Limited | 2.78 | 51.00% | 21.9 | 126,796.5 | 243,274.8 | |
| Four licences | 42929 | Emerald Resourcs NL | Mekong Minerals Limited | Kr.cheh, M0nd6I Kri |
12.82 | 20.00% | 861.0 | 14,890.2 | 25,980.0 |
ANNEXURE B – SUMMARY OF SUBSCRIPTION AGREEMENT
-
Gage has committed, subject to the satisfaction of the conditions precedent described below, to subscribe for 455,900,000 Shares at an issue price of $0.008 per Share (total subscription amount of $3,647,200) pursuant to the Gage Subscription. The Shares the subject of the Gage Subscription may be subscribed for by Gage and/or a nominee of Gage.
-
The Subscription is subject to the satisfaction of the following conditions:
-
Shareholder approval to issue the Shares forming the Gage Subscription to Gage being obtained, including for the purposes of item 7 of section 611 of the Corporations Act. This Shareholder approval is being sought at the Meeting;
-
an independent expert’s report being obtained by the Company, and such independent expert determining that the Gage Subscription is either:
-
fair and reasonable; or
-
not fair but reasonable,
-
to the non-associated shareholders of the Company. As set out in the Independent Expert’s Report in Annexure A, PKF Corporate has determined that the issue of Shares to Gage (and/or the Nominee) pursuant to the Gage Subscription and the acquisition by Gage (and, as applicable, the Nominee) of a relevant interest of, and the increase in the voting power of Gage (and, as applicable, the Nominee) from 18.67% to, 51% if Resolution 1 is approved is not fair but reasonable to non-associated Shareholders of the Company.
-
the Company obtaining any other required approvals, consents, authorisations and/or waivers; and
-
the Company issuing a prospectus for the purposes of section 708A(11) of the Corporations Act to facilitate the secondary trading of the Shares constituting the Gage Subscription.
-
The Subscription Agreement may be terminated if the conditions are not satisfied or waived by 30 June 2024 (or as otherwise agreed between the Company and Gage in writing) or the conditions become incapable of satisfaction or the parties agree that any condition cannot be satisfied, or either party suffers an insolvency event.
-
Following completion of Gage’s subscription, Gage will be entitled to appoint an additional director to the board of the Company.
-
From completion of the Gage Subscription, Gage will be entitled to participate in any equity offers conducted by the Company on terms no more favourable than those being offered to other offerees in that equity offer and up to the number of securities determined by the Company. The Company has agreed to not undertake any such equity offer prior to completion of the Gage Subscription without Gage’s prior written consent.
-
Gage has agreed to pay the Company’s costs (up to a maximum amount of A$130,000) in implementing the Gage Subscription.
-
The Subscription Agreement contains warranties from both Gage and the Company which are typical to subscription arrangements of this nature.
182
==> picture [136 x 63] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [11 x 13] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [11 x 13] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [14 x 13] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [14 x 13] intentionally omitted <==
Need assistance?
Phone:
1300 850 505 (within Australia) +61 3 9415 4000 (outside Australia)
Online:
www.investorcentre.com/contact
AQX
MR SAM SAMPLE FLAT 123 123 SAMPLE STREET THE SAMPLE HILL SAMPLE ESTATE SAMPLEVILLE VIC 3030 Alice Queen Limited Extraordinary General Meeting The Alice Queen Limited Extraordinary General Meeting will be held on Friday, 28 June 2024 at 1:00pm (AEST). You are encouraged to participate in the meeting using the following options: MAKE YOUR VOTE COUNT To lodge a proxy, access the Notice of Meeting and other meeting documentation visit www.investorvote.com.au and use the below information: Control Number: 999999 SRN/HIN: I9999999999 PIN: 99999 For Intermediary Online subscribers (custodians) go to www.intermediaryonline.com For your proxy appointment to be effective it must be received by 1:00pm (AEST) on Wednesday, 26 June 2024. ATTENDING THE MEETING IN PERSON The meeting will be held at: 454 Collins Street, Melbourne, VIC 3000
You may elect to receive meeting-related documents, or request a particular one, in electronic or physical form and may elect not to receive annual reports. To do so, contact Computershare.
Samples/000001/000001
==> picture [136 x 63] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [11 x 13] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [11 x 13] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [14 x 13] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [14 x 13] intentionally omitted <==
Need assistance?
Phone:
1300 850 505 (within Australia) +61 3 9415 4000 (outside Australia)
Online:
www.investorcentre.com/contact
AQX
MR SAM SAMPLE FLAT 123 123 SAMPLE STREET THE SAMPLE HILL SAMPLE ESTATE SAMPLEVILLE VIC 3030
YOUR VOTE IS IMPORTANT
For your proxy appointment to be effective it must be received by 1:00pm (AEST) on
Wednesday, 26 June 2024. Proxy Form XX How to Vote on Items of Business Lodge your Proxy Form: All your securities will be voted in accordance with your directions. Online: APPOINTMENT OF PROXY Voting 100% of your holding: Direct your proxy how to vote by marking one of the boxes Lodge your vote online at opposite each item of business. If you do not mark a box your proxy may vote or abstain as www.investorvote.com.au using your they choose (to the extent permitted by law). If you mark more than one box on an item your secure access information or use your vote will be invalid on that item. mobile device to scan the personalised QR code. Voting a portion of your holding: Indicate a portion of your voting rights by inserting the Your secure access information is percentage or number of securities you wish to vote in the For, Against or Abstain box or boxes. The sum of the votes cast must not exceed your voting entitlement or 100%. Control Number: 999999 SRN/HIN: I9999999999 Appointing a second proxy: You are entitled to appoint up to two proxies to attend the meeting and vote on a poll. If you appoint two proxies you must specify the percentage of PIN: 99999 votes or number of securities for each proxy, otherwise each proxy may exercise half of the votes. When appointing a second proxy write both names and the percentage of votes or For Intermediary Online number of securities for each in Step 1 overleaf. subscribers (custodians) go to www.intermediaryonline.com A proxy need not be a securityholder of the Company. SIGNING INSTRUCTIONS FOR POSTAL FORMS By Mail: Individual: Where the holding is in one name, the securityholder must sign. Joint Holding: Where the holding is in more than one name, all of the securityholders should Computershare Investor Services Pty Limited sign. GPO Box 242 Melbourne VIC 3001 Power of Attorney: If you have not already lodged the Power of Attorney with the registry, Australia please attach a certified photocopy of the Power of Attorney to this form when you return it.
Companies: Where the company has a Sole Director who is also the Sole Company Secretary, this form must be signed by that person. If the company (pursuant to section 204A of the Corporations Act 2001) does not have a Company Secretary, a Sole Director can also sign alone. Otherwise this form must be signed by a Director jointly with either another Director or a Company Secretary. Please sign in the appropriate place to indicate the office held. Delete titles as applicable.
By Fax:
1800 783 447 within Australia or +61 3 9473 2555 outside Australia
PARTICIPATING IN THE MEETING
Corporate Representative
If a representative of a corporate securityholder or proxy is to participate in the meeting you will need to provide the appropriate “Appointment of Corporate Representative”. A form may be obtained from Computershare or online at www.investorcentre.com/au and select "Printable Forms".
PLEASE NOTE: For security reasons it is important that you keep your SRN/HIN confidential.
You may elect to receive meeting-related documents, or request a particular one, in electronic or physical form and may elect not to receive annual reports. To do so, contact Computershare.
Samples/000001/000002/i12
MR SAM SAMPLE FLAT 123 123 SAMPLE STREET THE SAMPLE HILL SAMPLE ESTATE SAMPLEVILLE VIC 3030
Change of address. If incorrect, mark this box and make the correction in the space to the left. Securityholders sponsored by a broker (reference number commences with ‘ X ’) should advise your broker of any changes.
I 9999999999
I ND
Proxy Form
Step 1
Appoint a Proxy to Vote on Your Behalf
Please mark
to indicate your directions
XX
I/We being a member/s of Alice Queen Limited hereby appoint
the Chairman PLEASE NOTE: Leave this box blank if OR you have selected the Chairman of the of the Meeting Meeting. Do not insert your own name(s). or failing the individual or body corporate named, or if no individual or body corporate is named, the Chairman of the Meeting, as my/our proxy to act generally at the meeting on my/our behalf and to vote in accordance with the following directions (or if no directions have been given, and to the extent permitted by law, as the proxy sees fit) at the Extraordinary General Meeting of Alice Queen Limited to be held at 454 Collins Street, Melbourne, VIC 3000 on Friday, 28 June 2024 at 1:00pm (AEST) and at any adjournment or postponement of that meeting. Step 2 Item of Business PLEASE NOTE: If you mark the Abstain box for an item, you are directing your proxy not to vote on your behalf on a show of hands or a poll and your votes will not be counted in computing the required majority. For Against Abstain Resolution 1 Approval of Acquisition of a Relevant Interest The Chairman of the Meeting intends to vote undirected proxies in favour of each item of business. In exceptional circumstances, the Chairman of the Meeting may change his/her voting intention on any resolution, in which case an ASX announcement will be made. Step 3 Signature of Securityholder(s) This section must be completed.
==> picture [514 x 69] intentionally omitted <==
----- Start of picture text -----
Individual or Securityholder 1 Securityholder 2 Securityholder 3
/ /
Sole Director & Sole Company Secretary Director Director/Company Secretary Date
Update your communication details (Optional) By providing your email address, you consent to receive future Notice
Mobile Number Email Address of Meeting & Proxy communications electronically
----- End of picture text -----
A Q X
3 0 9 0 9 1 A