ALDORO RESOURCES LIMITED — Regulatory Filings 2021

Oct 26, 2021

27 October 2021

==> picture [113 x 66] intentionally omitted <==

Wyemandoo Pegmatite Loop Priority Target

• The Loop Pegmatite area located in the central Fairway Pegmatite corridor contains highly anomalous lithium and rubidium rock chip assays

• A total of 22 pegmatite rock chip samples taken around the loop pegmatite had an average of 1.06% Li2O and 0.94% Rb with samples reporting up to 2.6% Li2O and 1.7% Rb.

• Satellite imagery suggests a similar structure lies immediately to the south in a swarm of pegmatitic dykes

The Wyemandoo “ Loop Pegmatite ” structure located in the central corridor of the “ Fairway Pegmatite Field” contains lepidolite micas with anomalous lithium and rubidium assays that highlight the potential of the area for mineralisation. Pegmatites like the “ Loop Pegmatite ” structure are in the more distal areas from the parental granitic magma’s giving rise to fractionation and the potential for enriched Li, Rb and Cs metals. Sampling in and around the “Loop Pegmatite” and surrounds found over half the 22 samples analysed have >1% Li2O (up to 2.6% Li2O) and an average grade of 1.1% Li2O, which is within the range of typical lithium economic grades. Rubidium assays are above those typically found in LCT pegmatites with an average of 0.94% with values up to 1.7%. Caesium values average 262ppm with values up to 542ppm.

==> picture [459 x 319] intentionally omitted <==

Figure 1: Loop Pegmatite area showing the 22 rock chip sample sites and Li2O % in labels and Rb ppm thematically. Note the numerous pegmatite dykes in this section of the Fairway Corridor outlined in pink .

The Pegmatite corridor appears to be at least 10km long and up to 6km wide with lepodolite (Li) micas found in in several locations in the central fairway and a large section of the pegmatite bearing zone has the potential to be highly fractionated and enriched with the lithium suite of metals. Aldoro will

ALDORO RESOURCES LIMITED | ABN 31 622 990 809 | +61 2 7229 4628 SUITE 2, 1 ALTONA STREET WEST PERTH, WA 6005 http://www.aldororesources.com

==> picture [113 x 66] intentionally omitted <==

27 October 2021 be targeting this zone in the next phase of rock chip sampling across the “ Fairway Pegmatite Corridor” .

The Wyemandoo pegmatites generally trend NE and can strike over 1000m in length, vary from 1m to 20m in outcrop width with shallow to moderate dips, typically 30 to 60 degrees. While generally linear and sub parallel to the strike of host gabbro’s, the dykes show a range of morphologies including undulating, segmented en echelon style, pinch and swell as well as bifurcating. The Wyemandoo pegmatite swarm appears to cover a large area, a northeast corridor over 10km long and up to 4km wide where the full extent is masked by young alluvium and colluvium cover.

The Wyemandoo pegmatites represent a new Li-Rb bearing lepidolite pegmatite field, located over 25km north-northwest from the Youanmi Pegmatite Field. Anomalous Li- Rb bearing lepodolite rock chip samples have been taken over some 9km with planning underway to infill and extend sampling across the interpreted pegmatite corridor. The Wyemandoo Pegmatite Field will be a focus of investigation in the coming months.

END

Competent Persons Statement

The information in this announcement that relates to exploration data and results derived from open file reports and information supplied by the current licence holder has been prepared in accordance with the 2012 Edition of the Australian Code for reporting of Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves (JORC). The data was reviewed and compiled by Mr Mark Mitchell, a geological consultant to Aldoro Resources Ltd. Mr Mitchell is a Registered Professional Geoscientist (No.10049) with the Australian Institute of Geoscientists and has sufficient experience which is relevant to the style of mineralisation and type of deposit under consideration and to the activity which he is undertaking to qualify as a Competent Person as defined in the 2012 Edition of the Australasian Code for Reporting of Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves’. Mr Mitchell consents to the inclusion in the release of the statements based on his information in the form and context in which it appears.

About the Wyemandoo Pegmatite Field

The Wyemandoo Project, 80km southeast of Mount Magnet, covers 259.78km[2] on granted licences E57/1017 and E59/2431 and applications E58/571 and E58/555 forming a contiguous belt along the margin of the -Windimurra Igneous Complex. Aldoro have agreements over licence applications ELA58/571 and E58/555 which both lie within the pegmatite corridor. The project is a rare metal exploration project in an Archean layered mafic intrusion cut by numerous pegmatite dykes. There is also an extensive zone of high-grade hydrothermal tungsten (scheelite) veins. Several pegmatites have been mapped and sampled in granted licences.

This Announcement has been approved for release by the Board of Aldoro Resources Ltd

About Aldoro Resources

Aldoro Resources Ltd is an ASX-listed (ASX:ARN) mineral exploration and development company. Aldoro has a collection of Lithium / Rubidium focused exploration projects and nickel/copper/PGM exploration projects all located in Western Australia. Aldoro is currently exploring the Niobe and Wyemandoo rubidium/lithium/tantalum projects, the company is encouraged by the very high grades of rubidium and the at surface deposit which extends over multiple kilometers containing

ALDORO RESOURCES LIMITED | ABN 31 622 990 809 | +61 2 7229 4628 SUITE 2, 1 ALTONA STREET WEST PERTH, WA 6005 http://www.aldororesources.com

==> picture [113 x 66] intentionally omitted <==

27 October 2021

lithium, rubidium, tantalum and caesium. The Company is progressing it’s Narndee nickel/copper/PGM project, initial drilling of the first of over a dozen targets has successfully intersected nickel sulphides which is an encouraging start to the drilling campaign. The Company’s other projects include the Cathedrals Belt Nickel Project (Ni-Cu-PGM), with a significant tenement holding surrounding St George Mining’s (ASX:SGQ) Mt Alexander Project.

Disclaimer

Some of the statements appearing in this announcement may be in the nature of forward-looking statements. You should be aware that such statements are only predictions and are subject to inherent risks and uncertainties. Those risks and uncertainties include factors and risks specific to the industries in which Aldoro operates and proposes to operate as well as general economic conditions, prevailing exchange rates and interest rates and conditions in the financial markets, among other things. Actual events or results may differ materially from the events or results expressed or implied in any forward- looking statement. No forward-looking statement is a guarantee or representation as to future performance or any other future matters, which will be influenced by several factors and subject to various uncertainties and contingencies, many of which will be outside Aldoro’s control. Aldoro does not undertake any obligation to update publicly or release any revisions to these forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances after today's date or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events. No representation or warranty, express or implied, is made as to the fairness, accuracy, completeness or correctness of the information, opinions or conclusions contained in this announcement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, none of Aldoro, its directors, employees, advisors, or agents, nor any other person, accepts any liability for any loss arising from the use of the information contained in this announcement. You are cautioned not to place undue reliance on any forward-looking statement. The forward-looking statements in this announcement reflect views held only as at the date of this announcement.

securities by Aldoro. Nor does this announcement constitute investment or financial product advice (nor tax, accounting, or legal advice) and is not intended to be used for the basis of making an investment decision. Investors should obtain their own advice before making any investment decision.

ALDORO RESOURCES LIMITED | ABN 31 622 990 809 | +61 2 7229 4628 SUITE 2, 1 ALTONA STREET WEST PERTH, WA 6005

http://www.aldororesources.com

27 October 2021

==> picture [113 x 66] intentionally omitted <==

Sample	Easting	Northing	Datum	Rb_ppm	Li_ppm	Cs_ppm	Ta_ppm	Nb_ppm	Sn_ppm	W ppm
WYR021	655365	6848775	GDA94	4708	964	72.6	85.5	44	65	237
WYR022	655365	6848775	GDA94	1598	47	20.8	22.1	14	29	284
WYR023	655197	6848638	GDA94	3193	13	22.3	89.3	49	27	130
WYR024	655218	6848790	GDA94	4926	702	140.6	133.5	52	44	3296
WYR025	655200	6848900	GDA94	2712	31	33.3	139.1	44	70	60
WYR026	655700	6848750	GDA94	12	2.5	0.3	188.5	66	22	111
WYR031	655940	6848255	GDA94	4333	1543	195.4	48.4	39	17	2
WYR032	655763	6848218	GDA94	2244	26	26.0	83.1	36	106	2
WYR033	655690	6848220	GDA94	14433	9578	538.2	159.9	83	100	6
WYR034	655705	6848262	GDA94	12901	6967	379.2	96.5	62	157	6
WYR035	655750	6848300	GDA94	7863	1604	234.4	108.5	72	135	4
WYR036	655580	6848270	GDA94	11231	5387	304.9	77.8	59	120	5
WYR037	655610	6848250	GDA94	7751	470	150.4	38.2	18	82	2
WYR038	655475	6848145	GDA94	17123	12063	542.2	218.2	89	90	7
WYR045	655218	6848790	GDA94	4822	669	131.7	112.7	52	44	3092
WYR046	655925	6851736	GDA94	1996	10	23.5	159.8	64	71	0.5
WYR047	655873	6851750	GDA94	1736	29	25.2	173.1	47	122	0.5
WYR048	655536	6851708	GDA94	28	2.5	0.8	129.2	51	2	0.5
WYR049	655500	6851890	GDA94	1721	17	17.3	169.0	63	32	1
WYR050	655520	6851890	GDA94	10523	5000	401.2	275.9	92	89	3
WYR051	655540	6851895	GDA94	2663	351	38.8	170.4	61	55	1
WYR052	655100	6848723	GDA94	2893	55	35.4	149.0	59	59	0.5
WYR053	655350	6849775	GDA94	1704	12	18.2	140.7	44	31	2
WYR054	655461	6848830	GDA94	2625	44	39.0	133.9	54	32	0.5
WYR055	655690	6848360	GDA94	10404	6871	208.5	70.6	77	151	4
WYR056	655674	6848345	GDA94	11426	3494	233.8	98.7	54	136	5
WYR057	655650	6848266	GDA94	12721	8959	375.9	172.2	71	109	4
WYR058	655730	6848285	GDA94	6985	2843	121.0	129.4	59	85	3
WYR059	655765	6848313	GDA94	5046	1635	210.5	91.3	54	78	2
WYR060	655765	6848290	GDA94	3285	957	102.3	222.7	56	93	2
WYR061	655666	6848235	GDA94	12780	9840	321.2	258.2	72	77	3
WYR062	655634	6848268	GDA94	4422	1695	64.2	97.1	49	78	0.5
WYR063	655590	6848255	GDA94	8990	3569	380.0	130.8	64	114	3
WYR064	655630	6848290	GDA94	9145	4876	235.5	100.1	55	109	3
WYR065	655693	6848370	GDA94	9306	6020	169.3	52.2	53	116	4
WYR066	655655	6848255	GDA94	12749	9246	416.5	172.8	63	103	5
WYR067	655650	6848305	GDA94	10270	6555	250.0	86	55	123	3
WYR068	655645	6848265	GDA94	11090	7907	319.8	57.6	48	133	5
WYR073	657631	6849253	GDA94	1932	22	81.1	141.7	52	12	169
NRK00007	652722	6843917	GDA94	1594	80.9	18.7	54.2	30	15	0.8
NRK00008	652717	6843915	GDA94	7995	8104	218.7	87.3	37	38	1.8
NRK00009	652689	6843894	GDA94	595	129.7	8.4	75.0	35	10	0.7
NRK00010	652946	6844180	GDA94	3641	379.7	53.7	104.6	44	25	0.4
NRK00011	652886	6844149	GDA94	731	55.7	9.1	86.9	34	16	0.5
NRK00012	652885	6844080	GDA94	1706	388.1	24.5	67.9	33	20	0.6
NRK00013	652819	6844051	GDA94	4200	467	71.1	72.0	29	18	0.7
NRK00014	652784	6844008	GDA94	4886	688	69.2	77.4	45	19	0.6
NRK00015	652754	6843975	GDA94	989	29.6	13.3	167.9	46	20	0.5
NRK00016	652727	6843953	GDA94	1651	60.8	22.5	111.1	47	33	0.8
NRK00017	652984	6844218	GDA94	20	22.3	2.1	81.3	21	1	0.3
NRK00018	653038	6844247	GDA94	140	105.7	2.1	219.9	97	2	0.9
NRK00019	653068	6844271	GDA94	1202	36.7	20.5	232.5	73	22	0.6

Pegmatite summary sample assays table (previously reported by Aldoro on the 25/10/2021)

ALDORO RESOURCES LIMITED | ABN 31 622 990 809 | +61 2 7229 4628 SUITE 2, 1 ALTONA STREET WEST PERTH, WA 6005 http://www.aldororesources.com

JORC Code, 2012 Edition – Table 1 report template

Section 1 Sampling Techniques and Data

(Criteria in this section apply to all succeeding sections.)

Criteria	JORC Code explanation	Commentary	Commentary
Sampling	• Nature and quality of sampling (eg cut channels, random chips, or	Wyemandoo sampling
techniques	specific specialised industry standard measurement tools appropriate	•	Meridan120 & Aldoro rock chip sampling was undertaken while
	to the minerals under investigation, such as down hole gamma sondes, or handheld XRF instruments, etc). These examples should not be taken as limiting the broad meaning of sampling. • Include reference to measures taken to ensure sample representivity and the appropriate calibration of any measurement tools or systems used. • Aspects of the determination of mineralisation that are Material to the Public Report.	• • •	investigating and mapping local pegmatite relationships. It consisted of hammer prospecting over selected sites targeting local mineralisation and mineralisation styles. The reported samples were grab based on the presence of lepidolite micas and are not considered representative of the pegmatites due to low number of samples and non-systematic method of sample selection Sampling was biased towards collecting lepidolite samples No industry standard was applied during the sampling process
	• In cases where ‘industry standard’ work has been done this would be
	relatively simple (eg ‘reverse circulation drilling was used to obtain 1
	m samples from which 3 kg was pulverised to produce a 30 g charge
	for fire assay’). In other cases more explanation may be required,
	such as where there is coarse gold that has inherent sampling
	problems. Unusual commodities or mineralisation types (eg
	submarine nodules) may warrant disclosure of detailed information.
Drilling	• Drill type (eg core, reverse circulation, open-hole hammer, rotary air	Wyemandoo
techniques	blast, auger, Bangka, sonic, etc) and details (eg core diameter, triple		• No reported drilling in the licence.
	or standard tube, depth of diamond tails, face-sampling bit or other
	_type, whether core is oriented and if so, by what method, etc). _
Drill sample	• Method of recording and assessing core and chip sample recoveries		No reported drilling in the licence
recovery	and results assessed.
	• Measures taken to maximise sample recovery and ensure
	representative nature of the samples.
	• Whether a relationship exists between sample recovery and grade
	and whether sample bias may have occurred due to preferential
	loss/gain of fine/coarse material.
Logging	• Whether core and chip samples have been geologically and		No reported drilling in the licence
	geotechnically logged to a level of detail to support appropriate
	Mineral Resource estimation, mining studies and metallurgical
	studies.

5

Criteria	JORC Code explanation	Commentary	Commentary
	• Whether logging is qualitative or quantitative in nature. Core (or
	costean, channel, etc) photography.
	• The total length andpercentage of the relevant intersections logged.
Sub-	• If core, whether cut or sawn and whether quarter, half or all core	•	No reported drilling in the licence
sampling	taken.	•	No sub-sampling techniques used
techniques	• If non-core, whether riffled, tube sampled, rotary split, etc and	•	Not considered representative samples
and sample	whether sampled wet or dry.
preparation	• For all sample types, the nature, quality and appropriateness of the
	sample preparation technique.
	• Quality control procedures adopted for all sub-sampling stages to
	maximise representivity of samples.
	• Measures taken to ensure that the sampling is representative of the in
	situ material collected, including for instance results for field
	duplicate/second-half sampling.
	• Whether sample sizes are appropriate to the grain size of the material
	being sampled.
Quality of assay data	• The nature, quality and appropriateness of the assaying and laboratory procedures used and whether the technique is considered	Aldoro (NKR) & Meridian’s (WY) rock chip samples were tested at Intertek- Genalysis Laboratories in Maddington WA
and laboratory tests	partial or total. • For geophysical tools, spectrometers, handheld XRF instruments, etc, the parameters used in determining the analysis including instrument	• •	Samples were crushed and screened to 75μm WY series samples Nb, Sn, Ta & W and all NKR samples were analysed by 4A/MS a multi-element digest in 4 acids with an ICP-MS
	make and model, reading times, calibrations factors applied and their		finish
	derivation, etc.	•	WY series Cs, Li, Nb, Rb, Sn, Ta, W were analysed by FP6/MS which is
	• Nature of quality control procedures adopted (eg standards, blanks, duplicates, external laboratory checks) and whether acceptable levels of accuracy (ie lack of bias) and precision have been established.	•	a sodium peroxide fusion in Nickel crucibles and HCL to dissolve the melt with an ICP-MS finish. QAQC samples were not inserted in the sample consignment, The certified Laboratoryused it own blanks and standards forqualitycontrol.
Verification	• The verification of significant intersections by either independent or	•	Data collected in Li-ppm were converted by a factor of 2.153/10000 to
of sampling	alternative company personnel.		calculate a % Li2O figure
and	• The use of twinned holes.
assaying	• Documentation of primary data, data entry procedures, data
	verification, data storage (physical and electronic) protocols.
	• _Discuss any adjustment to assay data. _
Location of	• Accuracy and quality of surveys used to locate drill holes (collar and	•	Meridian and Aldoro used handheld Garmin GPS to record weigh points
data points	down-hole surveys), trenches, mine workings and other locations		in GDA94/zone 50. Samples not considered representative for Mineral
	used in Mineral Resource estimation.		Resource estimation
	• Specification of the grid system used.	•	Australian GDA94 datum used, no local grids
	• Quality and adequacy of topographic control.	•	No topographic control was applied or recorded

6

Criteria	JORC Code explanation	Commentary	Commentary
Data spacing	• Data spacing for reporting of Exploration Results.	•	No regular sample spacing applied, locations governed by available
and	• Whether the data spacing and distribution is sufficient to establish the		outcrop and at least one sample per interpreted individual pegmatite.
distribution	degree of geological and grade continuity appropriate for the Mineral	•	Sample collection method is not considered appropriate for mineral
	Resource and Ore Reserve estimation procedure(s) and		resource estimation.
	classifications applied.
	• Whether sample compositing has been applied.
Orientation	• Whether the orientation of sampling achieves unbiased sampling of	•	No orientation of rock chip samples other than collection of samples
of data in	possible structures and the extent to which this is known, considering		containing lepidolite micas
relation to	the deposit type.	•	No drilling conducted
geological	• If the relationship between the drilling orientation and the orientation
structure	of key mineralised structures is considered to have introduced a
	sampling bias, this should be assessed and reported if material.
Sample	• The measures taken to ensure sample security.	•	No security applied for the grab samples as they will not be used in
security			resource modelling

Section 2 Reporting of Exploration Results

(Criteria listed in the preceding section also apply to this section.)

Criteria	JORC Code explanation	Commentary	Commentary
Mineral	• Type, reference name/number, location and ownership including	Wyemandoo
tenement and land tenure status	agreements or material issues with third parties such as joint ventures, partnerships, overriding royalties, native title interests, historical sites, wilderness or national park and environmental settings.	•	The project consists of E57/1017 and E59/2431 held by Aldoro and E58/571 and E58/555 are under agreement with Aldoro but are still in application phase and held by Mining Equities Pty Ltd and Trafalgar Resources Pty Ltd. Sampling in E58/578 was done by Meridian 120 before a 50% reduction in E57/1017.
	• The security of the tenure held at the time of reporting along with any known impediments to obtaining a licence to operate in the area.	•	No known impediments to exploring on either of the Wyemandoo granted licences, however the licence applications have no secure
			title.
Exploration	• Acknowledgment and appraisal of exploration by other parties.	Limited historical exploration at Wyemandoo includes:
done by		•	Geological mapping by Australian Geophysical Pty Ltd in 1969
other parties			(Wamex report A141). This shows one lepidolite-bearing pegmatite
			at Wyemandoo.
		•	Geological mapping by I D Martin for Alcoa in 1983 (Wamex report
			A13164). This shows dozens of pegmatite dykes at Wyemandoo.
		•	Geological mapping by Pancontinental in 1988. This shows a
			number of pegmatites and annotates them as Na, K or Li type (see
			Wamex report 24289).

7

Criteria	JORC Code explanation	Commentary	Commentary
			• A small number of geochemical samples, including stream
			sediments, rocks and possibly soils, have been collected within the
			current licence area but were not analysed for any elements
			relevant to our current work.
			• As far as we are aware, no exploration drilling on pegmatites has
			ever been carried out within the current licence area
		Recent	exploration by Meridian120 focused on mainly tungsten but also lithium
		and includes
			• Detailed (1:1000 scale) geological mapping of three areas within
			the tungsten zone
			• Reconnaissance mapping (10,000 scale) west of the known
			tungsten zone
			• Broad scale mapping of pegmatites by GPS tracing
			• UV lamp prospecting
			• Epidote vein prospecting
			• Stream sediment sampling
			• Rock sampling of epidote and epidote-scheelite rocks
			• Soil sampling (loaming) with panning of heavy mineral concentrates
			and scheelite grain counting under UV light
			• GPS surveying of creeks and pegmatite dykes
Geology	• Deposit type, geological setting and style of mineralisation.	Wyemandoo
		•	The licence area is underlain by gabbroic rocks of the Wyemandoo
			layered mafic intrusion. The Wyemandoo mafics are separated from the
			main Windimurra mass by a major fault zone and a sliver of felsic and
			sedimentary schists. The layering trend at Wyemandoo is very different
			from that of the main Windimurra mass. It generally strikes east-north-
			easterly, and dips to the north. Metamorphic grade at Wyemandoo is
			possibly higher than at Windimurra
		•	There are numerous pegmatite dykes at Wyemandoo. Some contain
			lithium mica. Composite rock samples from the pegmatites have given
			assays up to 2.6% lithium oxide, 276 ppm tantalum, and 3296 ppm
			tungsten (0.42% WO3)
		•	The nearby granite pluton, immediately east of the licence area, is
			probably the parent source of the pegmatites this granite is named as
			part of the Wogala Suite. It is described as a metamorphosed
			monzogranite containing muscovite and biotite and local accessory
			fluorite
		•	In a geochronology report (Wingate 2015) the same granite is said to be
			part of the Tuckanarra Suite and a sample of it from near the north-
			eastern corner of the current licence area is described as biotite

8

Criteria	JORC Code explanation	Commentary	Commentary
			monzogranite with quartz, K-feldspar, plagioclase, biotite and muscovite
			plus accessory minerals. Its magmatic crystallisation age was
			determined by the zircon uranium-lead method as 2,678 million years
			(plus or minus 8 million years)
		•	Topaz, fluorite, beryl, lepidolite and trace tantalite have been recorded
			at Mount Wyemandoo not far from the project area (suggesting strong
			fractionation of a granite/pegmatite magma capable of depositing rare
			metals)
		•	Meridian have found an extensive zone of hydrothermal epidote-garnet-
			quartz-scheelite veins in the licence area. The veins are high-grade with
			rock assays up to 16.5% W03and occur along a linear structure
			hundreds of metres long.
Drill hole	• A summary of all information material to the understanding of the		No historical or current drilling on the licences for pegmatites
Information	exploration results including a tabulation of the following information
	for all Material drill holes:
	o easting and northing of the drill hole collar
	o elevation or RL (Reduced Level – elevation above sea level in
	metres) of the drill hole collar
	o dip and azimuth of the hole
	o down hole length and interception depth
	o hole length.
	• If the exclusion of this information is justified on the basis that the
	information is not Material and this exclusion does not detract from
	the understanding of the report, the Competent Person should clearly
	explain why this is the case.
Data	• In reporting Exploration Results, weighting averaging techniques,	•	Not applicable
aggregation	maximum and/or minimum grade truncations (eg cutting of high
methods	grades) and cut-off grades are usually Material and should be stated.
	• Where aggregate intercepts incorporate short lengths of high grade
	results and longer lengths of low grade results, the procedure used
	for such aggregation should be stated and some typical examples of
	such aggregations should be shown in detail.
	• The assumptions used for any reporting of metal equivalent values
	should be clearly stated.
Relationship	• These relationships are particularly important in the reporting of	•	No Drilling Reported in the reported areas sampled
between	Exploration Results.		.
mineralisatio	• If the geometry of the mineralisation with respect to the drill hole
n widths and	angle is known, its nature should be reported.
	• If it is not known and only the down hole lengths are reported, there

9

Criteria	JORC Code explanation	Commentary	Commentary
intercept	should be a clear statement to this effect (eg ‘down hole length, true
lengths	width not known’).
Diagrams	• Appropriate maps and sections (with scales) and tabulations of	•	No drilling results reported
	intercepts should be included for any significant discovery being
	reported These should include, but not be limited to a plan view of
	drill hole collar locations and appropriate sectional views.
Balanced	• Where comprehensive reporting of all Exploration Results is not	•	Full analytical results are provided for the lepidolite samples, while other
reporting	practicable, representative reporting of both low and high grades and/or widths should be practiced to avoid misleading reporting of Exploration Results.		rock chip results are available these are focused on scheelite mineralisation, not the commodity reported in the release or targeted for investigation at this stage.
Other	• Other exploration data, if meaningful and material, should be reported	•	Only the reported preliminary grab sample rock chips are material to the
substantive	including (but not limited to): geological observations; geophysical		Rb/Li/Cs investigation
exploration	survey results; geochemical survey results; bulk samples – size and
data	method of treatment; metallurgical test results; bulk density,
	groundwater, geotechnical and rock characteristics; potential
	deleterious or contaminating substances.
Further work	• The nature and scale of planned further work (eg tests for lateral	•	Future work will consist of detailed geological mapping supplemented
	extensions or depth extensions or large-scale step-out drilling). • Diagrams clearly highlighting the areas of possible extensions, including the main geological interpretations and future drilling areas, provided this information is not commercially sensitive.	•	by spectral surveying, surface geochemical sampling and pattern drill testing to assess the 3D potential of the host rocks to contain significant volumes of mineralisation High resolution satellite and drone imagery has been used to discriminate dyke-like features which may or may not be related to
			pegmatites. The proposed sampling programme will confirm if these
			features are pegmatitic through geological inspection and analysis using
			a pXRF analyser.

10