AI assistant
ALBION RESOURCES LIMITED — M&A Activity 2024
Nov 27, 2024
64359_rns_2024-11-27_4af26fb3-4178-45a1-bd90-899aea33bbb1.pdf
M&A Activity
Open in viewerOpens in your device viewer
28 November 2024
Acquisition of High-Grade Yandal West Gold Project
-
Albion has signed a binding tenement purchase agreement to acquire the Yandal West Gold Project (“Project”) from Great Western Exploration Limited (ASX: GTE)
-
The Project is located in the world class Yandal Greenstone Belt, ~55km north of the Bronzewing Gold Mine and ~60km south of the Jundee Gold Mine (both owned by Northern Star, ASX: NST) in Western Australia’s Northeastern Goldfields
-
The Project is adjacent to the recent Siona gold discovery made by Yandal Resources (ASX: YRL) which reported 107m @ 1.0g/t Au from 96m to end of hole (estimated true width of ~30m) (see ASX YRL announcement 15 November 2024)
-
Several shallow high-grade gold targets have been identified within the Project for priority testing, including the Barwidgee Fault, Ives Find and May Queen Targets
-
The Company plans to aggressively explore the Barwidgee Fault Target, which represents an exciting drill ready target (heritage clearance already completed) with the potential to host a large gold mineralised system over its ~3km strike (not including potential parallel shears). First-pass proof of concept drilling in 2023 returned significant gold results including 4m @ 9.0g/t from 39m and 7m @ 1.02g/t from 23m (23YWRC023, GTE).
-
The Ives Find Target represents possible analogies to YRL’s Siona discovery. Significant intersections from Ives Find include:
-
4m @ 8.5g/t Au from 38m (IFRC004)
-
3m @ 52.3g/t Au from 34m (IFRC005)
-
6m @ 4.7g/t Au from 54m including 2m @ 13.0g/t Au (IFRC017)
-
The May Queen target is west and parallel to the Barwidgee Fault and underscores the potential for parallel structures of this prospective fault trend. Significant results previously recorded at May Queen include:
-
4m @ 25.7g/t Au from 60m (HFRC022)
-
16m @ 1.64g/t Au from 13m (HFRC019)
-
Average drill hole depth of only 55 meters offers exploration potential at depth
-
Experienced mining executive Chris Tuckwell will join the Board as a NonExecutive Director on completion of the acquisition, with Julian Jarman to step down
-
Albion Directors, who hold a combined total of 18% of the ordinary shares on issue, have confirmed they will vote in favour of the Acquisition
-
Contemporaneous with the acquisition, Albion is conducting a capital raising (refer to today’s Trading Halt announcement)
Albion Resources Limited (“ Albion ” or the “ Company ”) is pleased to announce that it has entered into a binding tenement purchase agreement (the “ Agreement ”) to acquire the Yandal West Gold Project (“ Project ”) from Great Western Exploration Limited (ASX: GTE), located in the highly prospective Yandal Greenstone Belt in Western Australia’s Northeastern Goldfields. Completion of the Agreement is subject to conditions precedent, including Albion shareholder approval being obtained.
Albion’s Non-Executive Chairman, Steven Formica, commented:
“I am delighted to announce the proposed acquisition of the Yandal West Project to Albion shareholders. The Project is strategically located in a proven gold producing belt, positioned in-between the Bronzewing and Jundee gold mines operating by Northern Star and surrounded by critical infrastructure. The Yandal Belt continues to demonstrate its potential for major gold discoveries with the recent Siona gold discovery made by Yandal Resources (ASX: YRL) which reported 107m @ 1.0g/t from 96m to end of hole (estimated true width of ~30m).
The Acquisition will see Great Western Exploration (ASX: GTE) become a strategic substantial holder in the Company. We look forward to progressing the significant exploration potential across the gold targets we have inherited from GTE’s work as they now focus on their multiple high-impact drill programmes at their Sumo Niobium Target and Six Juggernaut VHMS Targets, to follow drilling at their Oval and Oval South Copper-Gold targets which is now underway.
With several shallow high-grade gold targets identified for priority testing, including the Barwidgee Fault which is drill ready with heritage clearance already completed, we intend to begin an aggressive exploration program on completion of the acquisition, which should provide a steady stream of exciting news flow for shareholders in 2025.”
Yandal West Gold Project
The Yandal West Gold Project encompasses three contiguous tenements, E53/1612, E53/1816 and E53/1369, covering a total area of 61km[2] . On completion of the acquisition and subject to conditions precedent being met (including shareholder approval), Albion will acquire an 80% ownership in E53/1612 and E53/1816 (20% Diversified Asset Holdings Pty Ltd) and 100% ownership in E53/1369.
The Project lies within the Northeastern Goldfields Province of the Yilgarn Craton, in the northern section of the Yandal Greenstone Belt (Figure 1). The Yandal Greenstone Belt is an elongate, fault-bounded, northnorthwest-trending belt of Archean mafic rocks and intercalated banded iron formations and felsic volcaniclastic rocks. The belt contains the multi-million-ounce Jundee and Bronzewing gold deposits owned and operated by Northern Star Resources (ASX: NST). The Mt McClure Fault and parallel structures that are spatially related to numerous gold occurrences in the wider area, pass through the Project area including the Project’s Bariwidgee Fault discovery where 4m @ 9.0g/t from 39m and 7m @ 1.02g/t from 23m was intersected in 23YWRC023 (See ASX GTE announcement 8 November 2023).
The Project is adjacent to the recent Siona gold discovery made by Yandal Resources (ASX: YRL) which reported:
-
107m @ 1.0g/t from 96m to end of hole (estimated true width of ~30m) (24IWBRC0039, YRL); and
-
40m along strike of 24IWBRC0039 returned an intercept of 80m @ 1.0g/t from 67m (estimated true width of ~28m) (241WBRC0047, YRL) (see ASX YRL announcement 25 November 2024).
The Siona discovery has been made on a 4.4 x 2km granitic intrusion within the greenstone. Similar geological settings occur at the Ives Find and potentially the May Queen Prospect areas where significant historical gold intersections have been returned related to similar granite intrusive within the greenstone.
2
==> picture [350 x 612] intentionally omitted <==
----- Start of picture text -----
Jundee Operations
(Northern Star)
Flushing
Meadows Siona Discovery
ASX/YRL
Yandal West
Project Tenement
Outline
Bronzewing Operations
(Northern Star)
Mt McLure
----- End of picture text -----
Figure 1: GSWA 1:2,500,000 bedrock geology map showing the location of the Yandal West Project on the Yandal Greenstone Belt and major gold mines and discoveries.
3
==> picture [390 x 440] intentionally omitted <==
----- Start of picture text -----
E53/1612
E53/1369
(Basalt)
(BIF)
(Granite)
(Granite) E53/1816
(Mafic Intrusive)
(Sedimentary)
(Felsic Volcanic)
----- End of picture text -----
Figure 2: GSWA 1:500,000 bedrock geology map and the location of the granite and porphyry intrusives (from GSWA 1:250,00 surface geology map) and location of main gold occurrences.
Key Target Areas at Yandal West:
Barwidgee Fault Target
The Barwidgee Fault is a discrete largely untested structure evident in both magnetic and radiometric data interpretation.
Four drill-holes completed by GTE in 2023 tested below and along strike from anomalous legacy Rotary Air Blast (RAB) drilling (GTE ASX Announcement 15 September 2022) and high-grade rock-chip results including 23.5g/t Au in the northern defined extremities of the Barwidgee Fault (GTE ASX Announcement 5 July 2017), Figure 3 and 4. This drill program resulted in significant assay results from drill-hole 23YWRC023 including 4m @ 9.0g/t Au from 39m and 7m @ 1.02g/t Au from 23m, and validated the prospectivity of the Barwidgee Fault.
The significant results were recorded from a logged basalt-chert sheared contact, interpreted to dip to the west. Based on this interpretation, the mineralisation recorded by 23YWRC023 was not intersected by hole 23YWRC022 (Figure 3), 23YWRC024 (located 50m south) and 23YWRC025 (positioned 600m to the north) and legacy RAB holes angled to the west potentially paralleled 23YWRC023.
4
==> picture [454 x 315] intentionally omitted <==
----- Start of picture text -----
7m @ 1.02g/t Au from 23m
4m @ 9.00g/t Au from 39m
----- End of picture text -----
Figure 3: Cross section at Barwidigee Fault Prospect drilling.
Harris Find is a shallow drill defined gold mineralisation system hosted in the southern defined extremities of the Barwidgee Fault (Figure 4). Significant intercepts in historical drilling at Harris Find include:
-
7m @ 4.3g/t Au from 27m (H11)
-
12m @ 2.1g/t Au from 35m (GYWRC009)
-
7m@ 1.13g/t Au from 44m (GYWRC017)
-
2m @ 6.55g/t Au from 26m (H5)
The Barwidgee Fault target represents an exciting drill ready target (heritage clearance already completed) with the potential to host a large gold mineralised system over its ~3km strike, not including any potential parallel shears. The Company plans to immediately follow up this drill target following acquisition completion which will comprise RC drilling as well as further geochemistry and geophysics along the highly prospective unexplored 2km strike to the south.
5
==> picture [393 x 559] intentionally omitted <==
----- Start of picture text -----
4m @ 9.00g/t Au from 39m and
7m @ 1.02g/t Au from 23m
H-5 GYWRC17
H-11 GYWRC09
----- End of picture text -----
Figure 4: Drill collar locations along the Barwidgee Fault structure as well as significant rock assay results overlaid on Geological Survey of Western Australia 1:500,000 Geological Map
Ives Find
The Ives Find Target covers the historic Ives Find gold mining centre where total historic production of 2,019t of ore for a total of 740 ounces of gold recovered (at an average grade of 11.4g/t Au) has been recorded.
Historical drilling at several prospects (Bell Miner, Duck, Duckling) across the Ives Find target intercepted the following shallow, high-grade drilling results (Figure 5):
6
-
CRC-12: 7m @ 7.4 g/t gold from 32m (incl 1m @ 23.0 g/t) - Bell Miner
-
CRC-14: 3m @ 11.2 g/t gold from 42m (incl 2m @ 16.0 g/t) - Bell Miner
-
IFRC003: 7m @ 2.52 g/t gold from 34m (incl 2m @ 4.8 g/t) - Bell Miner
-
IFRC004: 4m @ 8.52 g/t gold from 38m (incl 2m at 15.6 g/t Au) - Bell Miner
-
IFRC005: 3m @ 52.38 g/t gold from 34m - Bell Miner
-
IFRC017: 6m @ 4.72 g/t gold from 54m (incl 2m @ 13.02 g/t) – Bell Miner
-
IFRC087: 3m @ 15.02 g/t gold from 51m – Bell Miner
-
IFRC058: 6m @ 5.10g/t gold from 36m (incl 1m at 21.0 g/t Au) - Duckling
-
IFRC066: 4m @ 7.10g/t gold from 58m (incl 1m at 18.5 g/t Au) - Duck
-
IFRC069: 4m @ 6.16g/t gold from 32m (incl 1m at 22.2 g/t Au) - Duck
The significant intersections at the Bell Miner and other prospects in the Ives Find Prospect area are all hosted close to the western contact of a granite intrusive that extends for 4 km by 750m (Figure 2). The geological setting at the Ives Find intrusive is very similar style as the recent Siona gold discovery by Yandal Resources, which reported 107m @ 1.0g/t from 96m to end of hole (estimated true width of ~30m).
==> picture [413 x 473] intentionally omitted <==
Figure 5: Interpreted geology map of the Ives Find granite intrusive showing the distribution of RC and diamond drill holes and significant drilling intersections
7
The majority of drilling to date has focused on the central western portion of the Ives Find granite intrusive. The remaining areas of the intrusive remain underexplored (Figure 2). Interestingly, the Siona discovery occurs along the contact which has not been tested at Ives Find. It is encouraging to see several significant drilling intersections open at depth at Bell Miner within the granite (Figure 5) and these areas represent walk up drill targets in the area as well as the untested eastern shear contact.
The Company plans to compile and review all the historical drilling, soil and rock geochemistry to identify and define new target areas for further exploration work and drill testing.
May Queen
The May Queen Target area presents a geological setting of a greenstone belt that has been intruded by several granite intrusions of various sizes similar to Ives Find target and the Siona gold discovery by Yandal Resources. The mapped geology at May Queen Target is supported by magnetics data interpretation that suggests a consistent package of NW-trending greenstone rocks that has intruded by granitic intrusives.
Previously completed drilling at several prospects (May Queen, MQW1, MQW3, MQE1) across the May Queen Target has resulted in the following shallow, significant drilling results:
-
HFRC022: 4m @ 25.7g/t Au from 60m – May Queen
-
HFRC019: 16m @ 1.6g/t Au from 13m incl. 3m at 7.7 g/t Au & 17m at 0.8 g/t Au - MQW3
-
HFRC005: 2m @ 3.6g/t Au from 69m and 4m at 1.6 g/t Au from 53m – May Queen
-
HFRC070: 2m @ 6.6g/t Au from 44m incl. 1m at 12.6 g/t Au – MQE1
==> picture [281 x 394] intentionally omitted <==
----- Start of picture text -----
(HFRC05)
2m @ 3.6g/t Au
and 4m @ 1.6 g/t Au
(HFRC22)
4m @ 25.7g/t Au
Incl. 1m @ 98.7 g/t Au
(HFRC70)
2m @ 6.6g/t Au
Incl. 1m @ 12.6 g/t Au
(HFRC19)
16m @ 1.6g/t Au
Incl. 3m at 7.7 g/t Au
and 17m @ 0.8 g/t Au
----- End of picture text -----
Figure 6: GSWA 100K geology map of the May Queen area with several granite intrusives showing the distribution of RC and diamond drill holes and significant drilling intersections
8
The majority of legacy drilling intersections are primarily structurally hosted mineralisation within basalt for example at May Queen and MQE1 and most likely represent the southern extent of the highly prospective Barwidgee Fault (Figure 6). However, further to the south at MQW3 significant mineralisation has been intersected in what has been mapped as granite which is potentially a similar geological setting to the Siona discovery. The larger widths of mineralisation within the granite in HFRC19 support bulk tonnage potential similar to Siona. Given these encouraging developments, the Company plans to compile and review all the historical drilling, soil and rock geochemistry to identify and define new target areas for further exploration work and drill testing.
Acquisition Terms
Subject to the Company obtaining shareholder approval for the issue of securities below ( Consideration Securities ) and GTE delivering relevant documents to enable the transfer of the Project (together, the Conditions ), the Company proposes to pay the following consideration to acquire the Project:
-
22,222,222 fully paid ordinary shares ( Consideration Shares ) (with a deemed issue price of $0.045 per Share representing consideration valued at $1,000,000); and
-
30,000,000 performance rights with the following milestones and expiry dates ( Performance Rights ):
| Tranche | Number | Milestone | Expiry Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | 15,000,000 | Company declaring under the JORC Code a minimum 250,000 ounce contained gold inferred, indicated and/or measured Mineral Resource with a grade of at least 0.75 g/t (and cut-off grade of at least 0.5 g/t) |
5 years from the date of issue |
| B | 15,000,000 | Company announcing a Decision to Mine* | 5 years from the date of issue |
- Decision to Mine means a decision made by the Company to commence commercial mining operations on one or more of the Project tenements.
If the Conditions are not met by 10 February 2025, then the Agreement may be terminated.
Tenement E53/1369 is the subject of a pending extension application, seeking to extend the life of E53/1369 until 24 September 2026. In the event the pending extension of E53/1369 is not obtained, GTE has agreed that 7,407,407 Consideration Shares will be bought back by the Company for total consideration of $1. These Consideration Shares will be subject to a holding lock for a period commencing on the completion date of the Agreement and ending on the earlier of the grant of the extension of E53/1369 or the date a buyback is approved by Albion's shareholders.
The Agreement is otherwise considered to contain standard terms for agreements of this nature.
As part of the proposed transaction, the Company proposes to appoint Chris Tuckwell (as an independent nominee of GTE) to the board of ALB as a non-executive director. Chris is currently a non-executive director of ASX listed Arrow Minerals Ltd and has previous experience as a director of ASX listed companies including having been the Managing Director of MACA Limited. Mr Tuckwell has over 40 years’ experience in mining, mining services and mine development.
Completion of the Acquisition is expected in mid-January 2025.
9
Trading Halt Pending Capital Raise
Contemporaneous with the Acquisition, Albion is conducting a capital raising (refer to today’s Trading Halt announcement).
This announcement has been approved for release by the Board.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION:
Steven Formica Non-Executive Chairman [email protected]
COMPETENT PERSONS STATEMENT
The information in this announcement that relates to Exploration Results is based on and fairly represents information and supporting documentation prepared by Mr Leo Horn. Mr Horn is an independent consultant and a member of the Australian Institute of Geoscientists. Mr Horn has sufficient experience relevant to the styles of mineralisation and types of deposits which are covered in this announcement and to the activity which they are undertaking to qualify as a Competent Person as defined in the 2012 edition of the ‘Australasian Code for Reporting of Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves’ (“JORC Code”). Mr Horn consents to the inclusion in this announcement of the matters based on his information in the form and context in which it appears.
Table 1: Significant drilling intersections on the Yandal West Project reported within this announcement at 0.2, 0.5, 1.0, 4.0 and 5.0 g/t Au cut-off
| Hole ID | From m | To m | Interval | **Goldg/t ** | Cutoffg/t Au | Prospect | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 23YWRC023 | 23 | 30 | 7 | 1.01 | 0.5 | Barwidgee Fault | |
| including | 26 | 27 | 1 | 2.08 | 1 | Barwidgee Fault | |
| also including | 29 | 30 | 1 | 3.5 | 1 | Barwidgee Fault | |
| and | 39 | 43 | 4 | 9 | 0.5 | Barwidgee Fault | |
| including | 41 | 42 | 1 | 34.5 | 5 | Barwidgee Fault | |
| 23YWRC022 | 94 | 100 | 6 | 0.36 | 0.1 | Barwidgee Fault | |
| including | 97 | 98 | 1 | 0.75 | 0.5 | Barwidgee Fault | |
| also including | 99 | 100 | 1 | 0.65 | 0.5 | Barwidgee Fault | |
| IFRC032 | 16 | 20 | 4 | 3.87 | 1 | Bell Miner North | |
| including | 18 | 19 | 1 | 6.27 | 5 | Bell Miner North | |
| IFRC029 | 6 | 9 | 3 | 2.38 | 0.5 | Bell Miner North | |
| including | 7 | 9 | 2 | 3.24 | 1 | Bell Miner North | |
| IFRC030 | 2 | 6 | 4 | 0.54 | 0.5 | Bell Miner North | |
| including | 5 | 6 | 1 | 1.08 | 1 | Bell Miner North | |
| CRC-12 | 32 | 39 | 7 | 7.4 | 0.5 | Bell Miner | |
| including | 32 | 35 | 3 | 5.68 | 5 | Bell Miner | |
| including | 37 | 38 | 1 | 23 | 5 | Bell Miner | |
| IFRC001 | 43 | 46 | 3 | 2 | 0.2 | Bell Miner | |
| including | 43 | 44 | 1 | 5.33 | 5 | Bell Miner | |
| IFRC003 | 34 | 41 | 7 | 2.52 | 1 | Bell Miner | |
| including | 35 | 37 | 2 | 4.77 | 4 | Bell Miner |
10
| Hole ID | From m | To m | Interval | Goldg/t | Cutoffg/t Au | Prospect | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IFRC015 | 44 | 48 | 4 | 6.12 | 1 | Bell Miner | Mineralised at end of hole |
| including | 47 | 48 | 1 | 18.9 | 5 | Bell Miner | Mineralised at end of hole |
| IFRC087 | 51 | 54 | 3 | 15.02 | 0.5 | Bell Miner | |
| including | 52 | 54 | 2 | 22.15 | 5 | Bell Miner | |
| CRC-13 | 30 | 35 | 5 | 4.63 | 1 | Bell Miner | |
| including | 30 | 31 | 1 | 6.45 | 1 | Bell Miner | |
| also including | 33 | 34 | 1 | 14.04 | 1 | Bell Miner | |
| IFRC017 | 54 | 60 | 6 | 4.72 | 0.5 | Bell Miner | |
| including | 55 | 57 | 2 | 13 | 1 | Bell Miner | |
| also including | 55 | 56 | 1 | 21.6 | 5 | Bell Miner | |
| IFRC088 | 74 | 76 | 2 | 4.86 | 0.5 | Bell Miner | |
| including | 74 | 75 | 1 | 9.15 | 5 | Bell Miner | |
| CRC-14 | 42 | 45 | 3 | 11.17 | 1 | Bell Miner | |
| including | 42 | 44 | 2 | 16.03 | 5 | Bell Miner | |
| IFRC004 | 38 | 42 | 4 | 8.52 | 0.5 | Bell Miner | |
| including | 38 | 40 | 2 | 15.65 | 5 | Bell Miner | |
| IFRC005 | 34 | 37 | 3 | 52.37 | 1 | Bell Miner | |
| including | 34 | 36 | 2 | 78 | 5 | Bell Miner | |
| IFRC058 | 36 | 42 | 6 | 5.09 | 1 | Duckling | |
| including | 38 | 39 | 1 | 21 | 5 | Duckling | |
| IFRC066 | 58 | 62 | 4 | 7.1 | 1 | Duck | |
| including | 60 | 61 | 1 | 18.5 | 5 | Duck | |
| IFRC069 | 32 | 36 | 4 | 6.16 | 0.5 | Duck | |
| including | 33 | 34 | 1 | 22.16 | 5 | Duck | |
| HFRC005 | 53 | 57 | 4 | 1.61 | 1 | May Queen | |
| and | 69 | 71 | 2 | 3.64 | 1 | May Queen | |
| HFRC022 | 60 | 64 | 4 | 25.74 | 1 | May Queen | |
| including | 62 | 63 | 1 | 98.7 | 5 | MayQueen | |
| HFRC070 | 44 | 46 | 2 | 6.61 | 0.5 | MQE1 | |
| including | 44 | 45 | 1 | 12.6 | 5 | MQE1 | |
| HFRC019 | 13 | 29 | 16 | 1.64 | 0.2 | MQW3 | |
| including | 13 | 16 | 3 | 7.72 | 4 | MQW3 | |
| and | 33 | 35 | 2 | 3.64 | 1 | MQW3 | |
| and | 60 | 77 | 17 | 0.84 | 0.2 | MQW3 | |
| including | 63 | 64 | 1 | 5.92 | 5 | MQW3 | |
| also including | 69 | 75 | 6 | 1.07 | 0.5 | MQW3 | |
| H-11 | 27 | 34 | 7 | 4.31 | 0.5 | Harris Find | |
| including | 29 | 31 | 2 | 11.99 | 5 | Harris Find | |
| H-5 | 26 | 28 | 2 | 6.55 | 0.5 | Harris Find | |
| including | 27 | 28 | 1 | 12.5 | 5 | Harris Find | |
| GYWRC009 | 37 | 49 | 12 | 2.09 | 0.5 | Harris Find | |
| including | 38 | 39 | 1 | 5.99 | 5 | Harris Find | |
| GYWRC017 | 44 | 51 | 7 | 1.13 | 0.5 | Harris Find |
11
Table 2: Collar Locations for all RC and Diamond drilling across the Yandal West Project
| Hole ID | Prospect | **Drill Type ** | East | North | Elevation | Coord. Syst. | Depth | Company |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 23YWRC020 | Jewel | RC | 281503.0 | 7018307.0 | 524.7 | GDA94_51S | 60 | GTE |
| 23YWRC021 | Golden Orb | RC | 282841.0 | 7016811.0 | 513.3 | GDA94_51S | 90 | GTE |
| 23YWRC022 | Barwidgee Fault | RC | 279967.4 | 7022126.6 | 553.9 | GDA94_51S | 106 | GTE |
| 23YWRC023 | Barwidgee Fault | RC | 279923.8 | 7022110.7 | 555.5 | GDA94_51S | 94 | GTE |
| 23YWRC024 | Barwidgee Fault | RC | 279992.0 | 7022093.0 | 552.8 | GDA94_51S | 100 | GTE |
| 23YWRC025 | Barwidgee Fault | RC | 279641.3 | 7022685.0 | 555.2 | GDA94_51S | 91 | GTE |
| CRC 1 | May Queen Reward | RC | 278732.0 | 7021248.0 | 539.7 | GDA94_51S | 40 | Sabre |
| CRC 10 | May Queen Reward | RC | 278364.0 | 7021912.0 | 543.2 | GDA94_51S | 42 | Sabre |
| CRC 11 | May Queen Reward | RC | 278404.0 | 7021810.0 | 542.5 | GDA94_51S | 42 | Sabre |
| CRC 12 | May Queen Reward | RC | 278403.7 | 7021800.8 | 538.6 | GDA94_51S | 42 | Sabre |
| CRC 13 | May Queen Reward | RC | 278390.0 | 7021756.0 | 541.1 | GDA94_51S | 40 | Sabre |
| CRC 14 | May Queen Reward | RC | 278387.0 | 7021739.0 | 540.4 | GDA94_51S | 52 | Sabre |
| CRC 15 | May Queen Reward | RC | 278370.0 | 7021755.0 | 541.1 | GDA94_51S | 38 | Sabre |
| CRC 16 | May Queen Reward | RC | 278370.1 | 7021747.8 | 537.2 | GDA94_51S | 42 | Sabre |
| CRC 17 | May Queen Reward | RC | 278362.0 | 7021749.0 | 540.3 | GDA94_51S | 29 | Sabre |
| CRC 18 | May Queen Reward | RC | 278387.0 | 7021763.0 | 541.1 | GDA94_51S | 40 | Sabre |
| CRC 19 | May Queen Reward | RC | 278379.0 | 7021750.0 | 540.5 | GDA94_51S | 40 | Sabre |
| CRC 2 | May Queen Reward | RC | 278745.0 | 7021258.0 | 539.7 | GDA94_51S | 40 | Sabre |
| CRC 3 | May Queen Reward | RC | 278760.0 | 7021267.0 | 540.1 | GDA94_51S | 40 | Sabre |
| CRC 4 | May Queen Reward | RC | 278693.0 | 7021472.0 | 540.7 | GDA94_51S | 40 | Sabre |
| CRC 5 | May Queen Reward | RC | 278375.0 | 7022454.0 | 542.5 | GDA94_51S | 40 | Sabre |
| CRC 6 | May Queen Reward | RC | 278389.0 | 7022459.0 | 542.5 | GDA94_51S | 40 | Sabre |
| CRC 7 | May Queen Reward | RC | 278426.0 | 7022015.0 | 545.4 | GDA94_51S | 40 | Sabre |
| CRC 8 | May Queen Reward | RC | 278427.0 | 7021958.0 | 545.1 | GDA94_51S | 30 | Sabre |
| CRC 9 | May Queen Reward | RC | 278437.0 | 7021941.0 | 544.8 | GDA94_51S | 42 | Sabre |
| GYWDD013 | Harris Find | DD | 280896.0 | 7020358.0 | 536.2 | GDA94_51S | 120.5 | GTE |
| GYWRC001 | Yandal EM | RC | 281027.7 | 7020034.5 | 524.3 | GDA94_51S | 130 | GTE |
| GYWRC002 | Yandal EM | RC | 281084.1 | 7020046.2 | 524.7 | GDA94_51S | 170 | GTE |
| GYWRC003 | Yandal EM | RC | 281055.1 | 7020080.4 | 525.5 | GDA94_51S | 170 | GTE |
| GYWRC004 | Yandal EM | RC | 281115.6 | 7020006.2 | 523.6 | GDA94_51S | 180 | GTE |
| GYWRC005 | Yandal EM | RC | 281178.3 | 7020575.1 | 531.4 | GDA94_51S | 50 | GTE |
| GYWRC006 | Yandal EM | RC | 281221.4 | 7020639.4 | 532.7 | GDA94_51S | 180 | GTE |
| GYWRC007 | Yandal EM | RC | 281018.4 | 7020960.9 | 543.6 | GDA94_51S | 80 | GTE |
| GYWRC008 | Yandal EM | RC | 282336.2 | 7021857.7 | 553.1 | GDA94_51S | 100 | GTE |
| GYWRC009 | Harris Find | RC | 280876.7 | 7020358.2 | 530.8 | GDA94_51S | 90 | GTE |
| GYWRC010 | Harris Find | RC | 280895.4 | 7020366.4 | 532.7 | GDA94_51S | 82 | GTE |
| GYWRC011 | Harris Find | RC | 280941.9 | 7020380.3 | 538.3 | GDA94_51S | 198 | GTE |
| GYWRC012 | Harris Find | RC | 281000.4 | 7020159.4 | 528.0 | GDA94_51S | 180 | GTE |
| GYWRC014 | Harris Find | RC | 280919.0 | 7020330.0 | 536.5 | GDA94_51S | 72 | GTE |
| GYWRC015 | Harris Find | RC | 280903.0 | 7020344.0 | 535.7 | GDA94_51S | 84 | GTE |
| GYWRC016 | Harris Find | RC | 280888.0 | 7020381.0 | 535.8 | GDA94_51S | 102 | GTE |
| GYWRC017 | Harris Find | RC | 280888.0 | 7020381.0 | 535.8 | GDA94_51S | 90 | GTE |
| GYWRC018 | Harris Find | RC | 280893.0 | 7020401.0 | 536.7 | GDA94_51S | 84 | GTE |
| GYWRC019 | Harris Find | RC | 280898.0 | 7020375.0 | 536.2 | GDA94_51S | 156 | GTE |
12
| Hole ID | Prospect | Drill Type | East | North | Elevation | Coord. Syst. | Depth | Company |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| H-1 | Harris Find - Ives | RC | 280825.6 | 7020393.2 | 534.1 | GDA94_51S | 33 | Galtrad |
| H-11 | Harris Find - Ives | RC | 280876.6 | 7020360.2 | 535.4 | GDA94_51S | 40 | Galtrad |
| H-2 | Harris Find - Ives | RC | 280845.6 | 7020397.2 | 535.0 | GDA94_51S | 35 | Galtrad |
| H-3 | Harris Find - Ives | RC | 280856.6 | 7020401.2 | 535.0 | GDA94_51S | 35 | Galtrad |
| H-4 | Harris Find - Ives | RC | 280859.6 | 7020384.2 | 535.0 | GDA94_51S | 27 | Galtrad |
| H-5 | Harris Find - Ives | RC | 280867.6 | 7020384.2 | 535.8 | GDA94_51S | 35 | Galtrad |
| H-6 | Harris Find - Ives | RC | 280872.6 | 7020346.2 | 534.8 | GDA94_51S | 29 | Galtrad |
| H-7 | Unassigned | RC | 280890.2 | 7020320.7 | 535.0 | GDA94_51S | 23 | AUSUG |
| H-8 | Harris Find - Ives | RC | 280951.6 | 7020231.2 | 533.9 | GDA94_51S | 29 | Galtrad |
| H-9 | Unassigned | RC | 280825.1 | 7020465.8 | 535.1 | GDA94_51S | 27 | AUSUG |
| HFDH001_01 | Harris Find | DD | 281633.0 | 7017630.0 | 524.7 | GDA94_51S | 20 | GTE |
| HFDH001_02 | Harris Find | DD | 281633.0 | 7017630.0 | 524.7 | GDA94_51S | 28 | GTE |
| HFDH002 | Harris Find | DD | 281780.0 | 7017718.0 | 529.2 | GDA94_51S | 180 | GTE |
| HFRC001 | Harris Find | RC | 282501.6 | 7018885.2 | 541.8 | GDA94_51S | 136 | GTE |
| HFRC002 | May Queen | RC | 281302.4 | 7017900.9 | 521.2 | GDA94_51S | 96 | GTE |
| HFRC003 | May Queen | RC | 281268.4 | 7017881.5 | 520.6 | GDA94_51S | 84 | GTE |
| HFRC004 | May Queen | RC | 281337.4 | 7017921.0 | 521.9 | GDA94_51S | 144 | GTE |
| HFRC005 | May Queen | RC | 281744.6 | 7017696.0 | 524.1 | GDA94_51S | 84 | GTE |
| HFRC006 | May Queen | RC | 281709.4 | 7017676.2 | 522.7 | GDA94_51S | 104 | GTE |
| HFRC007 | May Queen | RC | 281674.5 | 7017656.1 | 520.6 | GDA94_51S | 132 | GTE |
| HFRC008 | May Queen | RC | 281639.9 | 7017636.4 | 520.1 | GDA94_51S | 84 | GTE |
| HFRC009 | May Queen | RC | 281605.2 | 7017616.7 | 519.3 | GDA94_51S | 84 | GTE |
| HFRC010 | May Queen | RC | 281569.5 | 7017596.8 | 519.2 | GDA94_51S | 88 | GTE |
| HFRC011 | May Queen | RC | 281535.4 | 7017577.1 | 519.1 | GDA94_51S | 120 | GTE |
| HFRC012 | May Queen | RC | 281500.6 | 7017557.3 | 518.9 | GDA94_51S | 92 | GTE |
| HFRC013 | May Queen | RC | 281465.9 | 7017537.3 | 518.3 | GDA94_51S | 88 | GTE |
| HFRC014 | May Queen | RC | 281779.7 | 7017715.4 | 525.6 | GDA94_51S | 84 | GTE |
| HFRC015 | May Queen | RC | 282062.1 | 7017878.0 | 533.5 | GDA94_51S | 88 | GTE |
| HFRC016 | May Queen | RC | 282096.5 | 7017898.2 | 534.4 | GDA94_51S | 96 | GTE |
| HFRC017 | May Queen | RC | 282027.4 | 7017858.2 | 533.2 | GDA94_51S | 84 | GTE |
| HFRC018 | May Queen | RC | 282511.9 | 7016197.4 | 507.9 | GDA94_51S | 69 | GTE |
| HFRC019 | May Queen | RC | 282546.3 | 7016216.9 | 508.3 | GDA94_51S | 96 | GTE |
| HFRC020 | May Queen | RC | 282580.6 | 7016237.6 | 510.1 | GDA94_51S | 100 | GTE |
| HFRC021 | May Queen | RC | 282486.0 | 7016182.4 | 508.0 | GDA94_51S | 88 | GTE |
| HFRC022 | May Queen | RC | 281259.0 | 7017878.6 | 520.4 | GDA94_51S | 108 | GTE |
| HFRC023 | May Queen | RC | 281701.9 | 7017669.7 | 522.2 | GDA94_51S | 84 | GTE |
| HFRC024 | May Queen | RC | 281686.5 | 7017746.8 | 525.4 | GDA94_51S | 88 | GTE |
| HFRC025 | May Queen | RC | 281652.0 | 7017727.2 | 525.2 | GDA94_51S | 120 | GTE |
| HFRC026 | May Queen | RC | 281617.4 | 7017706.5 | 524.9 | GDA94_51S | 84 | GTE |
| HFRC027 | May Queen | RC | 281758.3 | 7017567.9 | 519.5 | GDA94_51S | 88 | GTE |
| HFRC028 | May Queen | RC | 281827.4 | 7017609.4 | 521.2 | GDA94_51S | 96 | GTE |
| HFRC029 | May Queen | RC | 281860.9 | 7017630.1 | 523.3 | GDA94_51S | 84 | GTE |
| HFRC030 | May Queen | RC | 281792.6 | 7017588.4 | 520.1 | GDA94_51S | 84 | GTE |
| HFRC031 | May Queen | RC | 281839.3 | 7017139.4 | 514.2 | GDA94_51S | 84 | GTE |
| HFRC032 | May Queen | RC | 281805.8 | 7017119.2 | 513.5 | GDA94_51S | 84 | GTE |
13
| Hole ID | Prospect | Drill Type | East | North | Elevation | Coord. Syst. | Depth | Company |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HFRC033 | May Queen | RC | 281771.0 | 7017098.6 | 513.2 | GDA94_51S | 84 | GTE |
| HFRC034 | May Queen | RC | 281702.7 | 7017058.4 | 512.3 | GDA94_51S | 84 | GTE |
| HFRC035 | May Queen | RC | 281873.3 | 7017158.6 | 515.3 | GDA94_51S | 100 | GTE |
| HFRC036 | May Queen | RC | 281633.6 | 7017017.9 | 511.7 | GDA94_51S | 88 | GTE |
| HFRC037 | May Queen | RC | 281597.0 | 7016997.0 | 511.5 | GDA94_51S | 84 | GTE |
| HFRC038 | May Queen | RC | 281667.9 | 7017037.7 | 512.0 | GDA94_51S | 84 | GTE |
| HFRC039 | May Queen | RC | 281736.8 | 7017078.0 | 512.8 | GDA94_51S | 84 | GTE |
| HFRC040 | May Queen | RC | 282596.0 | 7016153.7 | 507.7 | GDA94_51S | 88 | GTE |
| HFRC041 | May Queen | RC | 282562.6 | 7016133.9 | 506.6 | GDA94_51S | 100 | GTE |
| HFRC042 | May Queen | RC | 282631.5 | 7016175.1 | 508.8 | GDA94_51S | 88 | GTE |
| HFRC043 | May Queen | RC | 282665.7 | 7016194.5 | 509.4 | GDA94_51S | 120 | GTE |
| HFRC044 | May Queen | RC | 282528.2 | 7016113.8 | 505.5 | GDA94_51S | 36 | GTE |
| HFRC045 | May Queen | RC | 281741.6 | 7017734.9 | 525.5 | GDA94_51S | 84 | GTE |
| HFRC046 | May Queen | RC | 281706.6 | 7017718.2 | 524.1 | GDA94_51S | 152 | GTE |
| HFRC047 | May Queen | RC | 281654.8 | 7017687.7 | 522.7 | GDA94_51S | 88 | GTE |
| HFRC048 | May Queen | RC | 282540.7 | 7016262.9 | 509.1 | GDA94_51S | 88 | GTE |
| HFRC049 | May Queen | RC | 282506.2 | 7016242.6 | 508.1 | GDA94_51S | 84 | GTE |
| HFRC050 | May Queen | RC | 282472.4 | 7016220.9 | 509.2 | GDA94_51S | 79 | GTE |
| HFRC051 | May Queen | RC | 282575.3 | 7016282.9 | 510.9 | GDA94_51S | 84 | GTE |
| HFRC052 | May Queen | RC | 282530.7 | 7016116.2 | 506.1 | GDA94_51S | 84 | GTE |
| HFRC053 | May Queen | RC | 282494.4 | 7016092.3 | 505.9 | GDA94_51S | 84 | GTE |
| HFRC054 | May Queen | RC | 282699.8 | 7016216.7 | 510.7 | GDA94_51S | 88 | GTE |
| HFRC055 | May Queen | RC | 283072.3 | 7015614.3 | 506.8 | GDA94_51S | 84 | GTE |
| HFRC056 | May Queen | RC | 283042.0 | 7015592.9 | 505.9 | GDA94_51S | 88 | GTE |
| HFRC057 | May Queen | RC | 282998.8 | 7015571.6 | 505.3 | GDA94_51S | 92 | GTE |
| HFRC058 | May Queen | RC | 281895.2 | 7017649.8 | 524.8 | GDA94_51S | 96 | GTE |
| HFRC059 | May Queen | RC | 281234.2 | 7017861.2 | 520.3 | GDA94_51S | 84 | GTE |
| HFRC060 | May Queen | RC | 281199.2 | 7017841.2 | 519.9 | GDA94_51S | 120 | GTE |
| HFRC061 | May Queen | RC | 281252.5 | 7017779.6 | 520.8 | GDA94_51S | 84 | GTE |
| HFRC062 | May Queen | RC | 281258.0 | 7017747.3 | 520.9 | GDA94_51S | 84 | GTE |
| HFRC063 | May Queen | RC | 282095.4 | 7017687.6 | 530.0 | GDA94_51S | 96 | GTE |
| HFRC064 | May Queen | RC | 282130.4 | 7017707.3 | 528.5 | GDA94_51S | 96 | GTE |
| HFRC065 | May Queen | RC | 282165.8 | 7017725.3 | 527.0 | GDA94_51S | 84 | GTE |
| HFRC066 | May Queen | RC | 282201.7 | 7017743.7 | 525.4 | GDA94_51S | 120 | GTE |
| HFRC067 | May Queen | RC | 282236.2 | 7017761.7 | 523.9 | GDA94_51S | 116 | GTE |
| HFRC068 | May Queen | RC | 282170.3 | 7017366.8 | 529.0 | GDA94_51S | 84 | GTE |
| HFRC069 | May Queen | RC | 282203.3 | 7017385.9 | 528.7 | GDA94_51S | 84 | GTE |
| HFRC070 | May Queen | RC | 282239.0 | 7017407.2 | 528.6 | GDA94_51S | 84 | GTE |
| HFRC071 | May Queen | RC | 282272.9 | 7017427.2 | 528.9 | GDA94_51S | 84 | GTE |
| HFRC072 | May Queen | RC | 282307.9 | 7017447.6 | 527.6 | GDA94_51S | 84 | GTE |
| HFRC073 | May Queen | RC | 282342.1 | 7017467.6 | 525.8 | GDA94_51S | 36 | GTE |
| HFRC074 | May Queen | RC | 282343.9 | 7017468.6 | 525.8 | GDA94_51S | 84 | GTE |
| HFRC075 | May Queen | RC | 282891.8 | 7015932.9 | 506.6 | GDA94_51S | 88 | GTE |
| HFRC076 | May Queen | RC | 282925.8 | 7015953.1 | 507.2 | GDA94_51S | 84 | GTE |
| HFRC077 | May Queen | RC | 282959.6 | 7015974.2 | 507.0 | GDA94_51S | 84 | GTE |
14
| Hole ID | Prospect | Drill Type | East | North | Elevation | Coord. Syst. | Depth | Company |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HFRC078 | May Queen | RC | 282993.8 | 7015994.2 | 506.1 | GDA94_51S | 84 | GTE |
| HFRC079 | May Queen | RC | 282323.3 | 7016880.2 | 513.3 | GDA94_51S | 84 | GTE |
| HFRC080 | May Queen | RC | 282358.3 | 7016900.7 | 514.7 | GDA94_51S | 84 | GTE |
| HFRC081 | May Queen | RC | 282394.1 | 7016918.8 | 516.0 | GDA94_51S | 92 | GTE |
| HFRC082 | May Queen | RC | 282427.6 | 7016941.5 | 517.7 | GDA94_51S | 84 | GTE |
| HFRC083 | May Queen | RC | 282462.2 | 7016962.1 | 518.1 | GDA94_51S | 84 | GTE |
| HFRC084 | May Queen | RC | 281562.0 | 7017771.4 | 528.9 | GDA94_51S | 108 | GTE |
| HFRC085 | May Queen | RC | 281592.5 | 7017789.8 | 528.7 | GDA94_51S | 100 | GTE |
| HFRC086 | May Queen | RC | 281516.7 | 7017742.6 | 526.8 | GDA94_51S | 96 | GTE |
| HFRC087 | May Queen | RC | 281266.9 | 7017973.6 | 521.3 | GDA94_51S | 84 | GTE |
| HFRC088 | May Queen | RC | 281231.8 | 7017952.6 | 520.7 | GDA94_51S | 108 | GTE |
| HFRC089 | May Queen North | RC | 281242.1 | 7018087.8 | 522.8 | GDA94_51S | 27 | GTE |
| HFRC090 | May Queen | RC | 281242.1 | 7018087.8 | 522.8 | GDA94_51S | 88 | GTE |
| HFRC091 | May Queen | RC | 280977.0 | 7017852.7 | 519.3 | GDA94_51S | 72 | GTE |
| HFRC092 | May Queen | RC | 281626.9 | 7017809.4 | 529.3 | GDA94_51S | 92 | GTE |
| HFRC093 | Low Strain Deformation |
RC | 280767.5 | 7019784.3 | 528.4 | GDA94_51S | 84 | GTE |
| HFRC094 | Low Strain Deformation |
RC | 280801.9 | 7019805.9 | 527.7 | GDA94_51S | 84 | GTE |
| HFRC095 | May Queen | RC | 282185.1 | 7017423.2 | 528.5 | GDA94_51S | 84 | GTE |
| HFRC096 | May Queen | RC | 282220.3 | 7017442.5 | 529.0 | GDA94_51S | 92 | GTE |
| HFRC097 | May Queen | RC | 282254.2 | 7017462.9 | 530.0 | GDA94_51S | 84 | GTE |
| HFRC098 | Yandal | RC | 282266.2 | 7017367.9 | 525.6 | GDA94_51S | 84 | GTE |
| HFRC099 | Yandal | RC | 282149.2 | 7017507.3 | 528.7 | GDA94_51S | 84 | GTE |
| HFRC100 | Yandal | RC | 282183.7 | 7017526.7 | 529.2 | GDA94_51S | 84 | GTE |
| HFRC101 | Yandal | RC | 280839.2 | 7020343.9 | 529.3 | GDA94_51S | 60 | GTE |
| HFRC102 | Yandal | RC | 280886.1 | 7020334.1 | 531.0 | GDA94_51S | 56 | GTE |
| HFRC103 | Yandal | RC | 280927.4 | 7020268.3 | 531.5 | GDA94_51S | 52 | GTE |
| IFDH001 | Ives Find | DD | 278786.0 | 7021294.0 | 540.3 | GDA94_51S | 120.3 | GTE |
| IFDH002 | Ives Find | DD | 278786.0 | 7021285.0 | 540.1 | GDA94_51S | 82.45 | GTE |
| IFRC001 | Ives Find | RC | 278411.6 | 7021801.4 | 539.6 | GDA94_51S | 60 | Vanguard |
| IFRC002 | Ives Find | RC | 278404.1 | 7021787.5 | 538.3 | GDA94_51S | 44 | Vanguard |
| IFRC003 | Ives Find | RC | 278393.6 | 7021774.2 | 537.9 | GDA94_51S | 54 | Vanguard |
| IFRC004 | Ives Find | RC | 278388.8 | 7021748.7 | 537.4 | GDA94_51S | 48 | Vanguard |
| IFRC005 | Ives Find | RC | 278375.2 | 7021742.4 | 537.1 | GDA94_51S | 58 | Vanguard |
| IFRC006 | Ives Find | RC | 278769.5 | 7021146.7 | 536.1 | GDA94_51S | 112 | GTE |
| IFRC007 | Ives Find | RC | 278165.9 | 7021861.2 | 536.1 | GDA94_51S | 48 | Vanguard |
| IFRC008 | Ives Find | RC | 278382.0 | 7021723.8 | 536.9 | GDA94_51S | 112 | GTE |
| IFRC011 | Ives Find | RC | 278824.7 | 7021050.8 | 534.5 | GDA94_51S | 64 | Vanguard |
| IFRC012 | Ives Find | RC | 278773.6 | 7021052.7 | 535.0 | GDA94_51S | 48 | Vanguard |
| IFRC014 | Ives Find | RC | 278417.7 | 7021783.9 | 538.2 | GDA94_51S | 60 | Vanguard |
| IFRC015 | Ives Find | RC | 278412.9 | 7021773.7 | 537.9 | GDA94_51S | 48 | Vanguard |
| IFRC016 | Ives Find | RC | 278363.9 | 7021733.5 | 536.8 | GDA94_51S | 52 | Vanguard |
| IFRC017 | Ives Find | RC | 278389.8 | 7021722.5 | 537.3 | GDA94_51S | 68 | Vanguard |
| IFRC020 | Unassigned | RC | 278405.8 | 7022045.0 | 544.5 | GDA94_51S | 31 | Vanguard |
| IFRC021 | Unassigned | RC | 278420.3 | 7022002.3 | 544.7 | GDA94_51S | 50 | Vanguard |
| IFRC022 | Unassigned | RC | 278427.6 | 7021982.0 | 544.5 | GDA94_51S | 34 | Vanguard |
15
| Hole ID | Prospect | Drill Type | East | North | Elevation | Coord. Syst. | Depth | Company |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IFRC023 | Unassigned | RC | 278415.8 | 7021942.5 | 543.4 | GDA94_51S | 50 | Vanguard |
| IFRC024 | Unassigned | RC | 278426.1 | 7021942.3 | 543.3 | GDA94_51S | 37 | Vanguard |
| IFRC025 | Unassigned | RC | 278398.3 | 7021920.5 | 543.0 | GDA94_51S | 64 | Vanguard |
| IFRC026 | Unassigned | RC | 278382.3 | 7021901.2 | 542.3 | GDA94_51S | 30 | Vanguard |
| IFRC027 | Unassigned | RC | 278375.8 | 7021880.4 | 541.1 | GDA94_51S | 40 | Vanguard |
| IFRC028 | Unassigned | RC | 278361.7 | 7021860.0 | 540.9 | GDA94_51S | 30 | Vanguard |
| IFRC029 | Unassigned | RC | 278375.3 | 7021840.6 | 540.0 | GDA94_51S | 36 | Vanguard |
| IFRC030 | Unassigned | RC | 278376.2 | 7021820.9 | 539.4 | GDA94_51S | 34 | Vanguard |
| IFRC031 | Unassigned | RC | 278375.1 | 7021802.3 | 538.9 | GDA94_51S | 40 | Vanguard |
| IFRC032 | Unassigned | RC | 278381.6 | 7021862.2 | 540.8 | GDA94_51S | 58 | Vanguard |
| IFRC033 | Unassigned | RC | 278400.9 | 7021861.3 | 540.6 | GDA94_51S | 58 | Vanguard |
| IFRC034 | Unassigned | RC | 278747.3 | 7021395.1 | 539.2 | GDA94_51S | 40 | Vanguard |
| IFRC035 | Unassigned | RC | 278734.4 | 7021352.4 | 538.9 | GDA94_51S | 48 | Vanguard |
| IFRC036 | Unassigned | RC | 278678.3 | 7021468.0 | 539.5 | GDA94_51S | 40 | Vanguard |
| IFRC037 | Unassigned | RC | 278665.7 | 7021483.6 | 539.3 | GDA94_51S | 34 | Vanguard |
| IFRC038 | Unassigned | RC | 278649.7 | 7021495.0 | 539.0 | GDA94_51S | 30 | Vanguard |
| IFRC039 | Unassigned | RC | 278628.3 | 7021502.0 | 539.3 | GDA94_51S | 22 | Vanguard |
| IFRC040 | Unassigned | RC | 278613.6 | 7021515.6 | 538.3 | GDA94_51S | 32 | Vanguard |
| IFRC041 | Unassigned | RC | 278599.9 | 7021530.6 | 537.9 | GDA94_51S | 40 | Vanguard |
| IFRC042 | Unassigned | RC | 278623.9 | 7021526.9 | 538.6 | GDA94_51S | 64 | Vanguard |
| IFRC043 | Unassigned | RC | 278722.5 | 7021427.6 | 539.4 | GDA94_51S | 40 | Vanguard |
| IFRC044 | Unassigned | RC | 278742.3 | 7021286.0 | 538.2 | GDA94_51S | 28 | Vanguard |
| IFRC045 | Unassigned | RC | 278735.6 | 7021265.1 | 537.7 | GDA94_51S | 40 | Vanguard |
| IFRC046 | Unassigned | RC | 278774.5 | 7021056.5 | 535.0 | GDA94_51S | 40 | Vanguard |
| IFRC047 | Unassigned | RC | 278780.5 | 7021015.4 | 534.5 | GDA94_51S | 46 | Vanguard |
| IFRC048 | Unassigned | RC | 278987.7 | 7021043.7 | 534.1 | GDA94_51S | 47 | Vanguard |
| IFRC049 | Unassigned | RC | 279001.8 | 7021057.9 | 534.2 | GDA94_51S | 58 | Vanguard |
| IFRC050 | Unassigned | RC | 278962.2 | 7021059.9 | 534.3 | GDA94_51S | 52 | Vanguard |
| IFRC051 | Unassigned | RC | 278446.1 | 7021984.4 | 544.6 | GDA94_51S | 64 | Vanguard |
| IFRC052 | Unassigned | RC | 278454.8 | 7021942.7 | 543.6 | GDA94_51S | 52 | Vanguard |
| IFRC053 | Ives Find | RC | 278719.5 | 7021014.8 | 535.1 | GDA94_51S | 40 | GTE |
| IFRC054 | Ives Find | RC | 278739.3 | 7021015.1 | 534.9 | GDA94_51S | 40 | GTE |
| IFRC055 | Ives Find | RC | 278759.8 | 7021015.6 | 534.7 | GDA94_51S | 40 | GTE |
| IFRC056 | Ives Find | RC | 278820.3 | 7021016.2 | 534.1 | GDA94_51S | 52 | GTE |
| IFRC057 | Ives Find | RC | 278799.7 | 7021056.2 | 534.7 | GDA94_51S | 76 | GTE |
| IFRC058 | Ives Find | RC | 278801.1 | 7020995.9 | 534.0 | GDA94_51S | 48 | GTE |
| IFRC059 | Ives Find | RC | 278820.8 | 7020995.4 | 533.9 | GDA94_51S | 70 | GTE |
| IFRC060 | Ives Find | RC | 278402.8 | 7021685.7 | 536.7 | GDA94_51S | 114 | Vanguard |
| IFRC061 | Ives Find | RC | 278417.0 | 7021648.0 | 536.6 | GDA94_51S | 136 | Vanguard |
| IFRC062 | Ives Find | RC | 278821.2 | 7020976.2 | 533.6 | GDA94_51S | 70 | GTE |
| IFRC063 | Ives Find | RC | 278749.1 | 7021364.0 | 538.9 | GDA94_51S | 48 | GTE |
| IFRC064 | Ives Find | RC | 278769.8 | 7021314.8 | 538.8 | GDA94_51S | 44 | GTE |
| IFRC065 | Ives Find | RC | 278418.1 | 7021784.9 | 538.8 | GDA94_51S | 42 | Vanguard |
| IFRC066 | Ives Find | RC | 278784.9 | 7021243.4 | 537.5 | GDA94_51S | 109 | GTE |
| IFRC067 | Ives Find | RC | 278769.5 | 7021146.7 | 536.1 | GDA94_51S | 70 | GTE |
16
| Hole ID | Prospect | Drill Type | East | North | Elevation | Coord. Syst. | Depth | Company |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IFRC069 | Ives Find | RC | 278770.4 | 7021257.7 | 537.5 | GDA94_51S | 50 | Vanguard |
| IFRC070 | Ives Find | RC | 278358.6 | 7021691.4 | 536.6 | GDA94_51S | 92 | Vanguard |
| IFRC071 | Ives Find | RC | 278704.9 | 7021160.4 | 535.6 | GDA94_51S | 50 | Vanguard |
| IFRC072 | Ives Find | RC | 278800.7 | 7021015.7 | 534.2 | GDA94_51S | 64 | Vanguard |
| IFRC073 | Ives Find - Duck | RC | 278783.7 | 7021285.8 | 540.3 | GDA94_51S | 72 | GTE |
| IFRC074 | Ives Find | RC | 278620.8 | 7021509.0 | 541.2 | GDA94_51S | 44 | GTE |
| IFRC075 | Ives Find - Duckling | RC | 278801.8 | 7020935.8 | 536.6 | GDA94_51S | 48 | GTE |
| IFRC076 | Ives Find | RC | 279144.9 | 7020634.8 | 531.3 | GDA94_51S | 120 | GTE |
| IFRC077 | Ives Find | RC | 278801.9 | 7020819.4 | 535.2 | GDA94_51S | 200 | GTE |
| IFRC078 | Ives Find | RC | 278465.3 | 7021028.5 | 534.4 | GDA94_51S | 90 | GTE |
| IFRC079 | Ives Find | RC | 278804.4 | 7020956.9 | 536.8 | GDA94_51S | 76 | GTE |
| IFRC080 | Ives Find | RC | 278841.5 | 7020996.4 | 537.0 | GDA94_51S | 180 | GTE |
| IFRC081 | Ives Find | RC | 278812.8 | 7021214.2 | 539.4 | GDA94_51S | 200 | GTE |
| IFRC082 | Ives Find | RC | 278793.0 | 7021323.6 | 540.6 | GDA94_51S | 164 | GTE |
| IFRC083 | Ives Find | RC | 278450.5 | 7021702.2 | 540.9 | GDA94_51S | 252 | GTE |
| IFRC084 | Ives Find | RC | 278282.3 | 7021770.2 | 539.2 | GDA94_51S | 72 | GTE |
| IFRC085 | Duck | RC | 278797.4 | 7021301.5 | 540.3 | GDA94_51S | 112 | GTE |
| IFRC086 | Duck | RC | 278858.4 | 7021279.3 | 539.7 | GDA94_51S | 80 | GTE |
| IFRC087 | Bell Miner | RC | 278415.5 | 7021770.3 | 541.4 | GDA94_51S | 132 | GTE |
| IFRC088 | Bell Miner | RC | 278399.7 | 7021704.6 | 540.3 | GDA94_51S | 152 | GTE |
| IFRC089 | Bell Miner | RC | 278465.7 | 7021797.8 | 542.8 | GDA94_51S | 120 | GTE |
17
Table 3: Maximum Gold Assay Results >0.05 g/t Au from May Queen Drilling in Figure 6
| Hole ID | Prospect | **Drill Type ** | Depth | East | North | Elevation | Coord. Syst. | **Au_ppm ** |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HFRC022 | May Queen |
RC | 108 | 281259.0 | 7017878.6 | 520.4 | GDA94_51S | 98.7 |
| HFRC019 | May Queen |
RC | 96 | 282546.3 | 7016216.9 | 508.3 | GDA94_51S | 13.1 |
| HFRC070 | May Queen |
RC | 84 | 282239.0 | 7017407.2 | 528.6 | GDA94_51S | 12.6 |
| HFRC040 | May Queen |
RC | 88 | 282596.0 | 7016153.7 | 507.7 | GDA94_51S | 7.79 |
| HFRC085 | May Queen |
RC | 100 | 281592.5 | 7017789.8 | 528.7 | GDA94_51S | 7.54 |
| HFRC099 | Yandal | RC | 84 | 282149.2 | 7017507.3 | 528.7 | GDA94_51S | 7.3 |
| HFRC025 | May Queen |
RC | 120 | 281652.0 | 7017727.2 | 525.2 | GDA94_51S | 4.72 |
| HFRC015 | May Queen |
RC | 88 | 282062.1 | 7017878.0 | 533.5 | GDA94_51S | 4.24 |
| HFRC005 | May Queen |
RC | 84 | 281744.6 | 7017696.0 | 524.1 | GDA94_51S | 4.21 |
| HFRC084 | May Queen |
RC | 108 | 281562.0 | 7017771.4 | 528.9 | GDA94_51S | 3.78 |
| HFRC064 | May Queen |
RC | 96 | 282130.4 | 7017707.3 | 528.5 | GDA94_51S | 3.69 |
| HFRC003 | May Queen |
RC | 84 | 281268.4 | 7017881.5 | 520.6 | GDA94_51S | 3.35 |
| 10MWR67 | Unassigned | RAB | 38 | 282496.0 | 7016207.0 | 511.3 | GDA94_51S | 3.19 |
| HFRC041 | May Queen |
RC | 100 | 282562.6 | 7016133.9 | 506.6 | GDA94_51S | 3.08 |
| HFRC023 | May Queen |
RC | 84 | 281701.9 | 7017669.7 | 522.2 | GDA94_51S | 2.89 |
| HFRC087 | May Queen |
RC | 84 | 281266.9 | 7017973.6 | 521.3 | GDA94_51S | 2.77 |
| HFRC092 | May Queen |
RC | 92 | 281626.9 | 7017809.4 | 529.3 | GDA94_51S | 2.55 |
| HFRC004 | May Queen |
RC | 144 | 281337.4 | 7017921.0 | 521.9 | GDA94_51S | 1.44 |
| HFRC069 | May Queen |
RC | 84 | 282203.3 | 7017385.9 | 528.7 | GDA94_51S | 1.31 |
| HFRC044 | May Queen |
RC | 36 | 282528.2 | 7016113.8 | 505.5 | GDA94_51S | 1.26 |
| HFRC007 | May Queen |
RC | 132 | 281674.5 | 7017656.1 | 520.6 | GDA94_51S | 1.25 |
| HFRC063 | May Queen |
RC | 96 | 282095.4 | 7017687.6 | 530.0 | GDA94_51S | 1.22 |
| HFRC096 | May Queen |
RC | 92 | 282220.3 | 7017442.5 | 529.0 | GDA94_51S | 1.13 |
| HFRC002 | May Queen |
RC | 96 | 281302.4 | 7017900.9 | 521.2 | GDA94_51S | 1.1 |
| HFRC048 | May Queen |
RC | 88 | 282540.7 | 7016262.9 | 509.1 | GDA94_51S | 1.01 |
| HFRC065 | May Queen |
RC | 84 | 282165.8 | 7017725.3 | 527.0 | GDA94_51S | 0.976 |
| HFRC049 | May Queen |
RC | 84 | 282506.2 | 7016242.6 | 508.1 | GDA94_51S | 0.959 |
| HFRC083 | May Queen |
RC | 84 | 282462.2 | 7016962.1 | 518.1 | GDA94_51S | 0.94 |
| HFRC054 | May Queen |
RC | 88 | 282699.8 | 7016216.7 | 510.7 | GDA94_51S | 0.887 |
| HFRC095 | May Queen |
RC | 84 | 282185.1 | 7017423.2 | 528.5 | GDA94_51S | 0.858 |
| 10MWR41 | Unassigned | RAB | 11 | 283051.0 | 7015589.0 | 506.8 | GDA94_51S | 0.826 |
| HFRC028 | May Queen |
RC | 96 | 281827.4 | 7017609.4 | 521.2 | GDA94_51S | 0.814 |
| HFRC026 | May Queen |
RC | 84 | 281617.4 | 7017706.5 | 524.9 | GDA94_51S | 0.806 |
18
| HFRC046 | May Queen |
RC | 152 | 281706.6 | 7017718.2 | 524.1 | GDA94_51S | 0.8 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10MWR33 | Unassigned | RAB | 9 | 282898.0 | 7015601.0 | 506.9 | GDA94_51S | 0.8 |
| HFRC017 | May Queen |
RC | 84 | 282027.4 | 7017858.2 | 533.2 | GDA94_51S | 0.787 |
| HFRC047 | May Queen |
RC | 88 | 281654.8 | 7017687.7 | 522.7 | GDA94_51S | 0.744 |
| HFRC068 | May Queen |
RC | 84 | 282170.3 | 7017366.8 | 529.0 | GDA94_51S | 0.671 |
| HFRC086 | May Queen |
RC | 96 | 281516.7 | 7017742.6 | 526.8 | GDA94_51S | 0.65 |
| HFRC027 | May Queen |
RC | 88 | 281758.3 | 7017567.9 | 519.5 | GDA94_51S | 0.646 |
| HFRC071 | May Queen |
RC | 84 | 282272.9 | 7017427.2 | 528.9 | GDA94_51S | 0.583 |
| HFRC055 | May Queen |
RC | 84 | 283072.3 | 7015614.3 | 506.8 | GDA94_51S | 0.572 |
| HFRC043 | May Queen |
RC | 120 | 282665.7 | 7016194.5 | 509.4 | GDA94_51S | 0.557 |
| HFRC051 | May Queen |
RC | 84 | 282575.3 | 7016282.9 | 510.9 | GDA94_51S | 0.533 |
| Hole ID | Prospect | Drill Type | Depth | East | North | Elevation | Coord. Syst. | Au_ppm |
| HFRC006 | May Queen |
RC | 104 | 281709.4 | 7017676.2 | 522.7 | GDA94_51S | 0.522 |
| HFRC077 | May Queen |
RC | 84 | 282959.6 | 7015974.2 | 507.0 | GDA94_51S | 0.498 |
| HFRC072 | May Queen |
RC | 84 | 282307.9 | 7017447.6 | 527.6 | GDA94_51S | 0.498 |
| 23YWRC020 | Jewel | RC | 60 | 281503.0 | 7018307.0 | 524.7 | GDA94_51S | 0.443 |
| HFRC024 | May Queen |
RC | 88 | 281686.5 | 7017746.8 | 525.4 | GDA94_51S | 0.421 |
| HFRC020 | May Queen |
RC | 100 | 282580.6 | 7016237.6 | 510.1 | GDA94_51S | 0.4 |
| HFRC058 | May Queen |
RC | 96 | 281895.2 | 7017649.8 | 524.8 | GDA94_51S | 0.395 |
| HFRC016 | May Queen |
RC | 96 | 282096.5 | 7017898.2 | 534.4 | GDA94_51S | 0.33 |
| HFRC080 | May Queen |
RC | 84 | 282358.3 | 7016900.7 | 514.7 | GDA94_51S | 0.33 |
| HFRC076 | May Queen |
RC | 84 | 282925.8 | 7015953.1 | 507.2 | GDA94_51S | 0.32 |
| HFRC082 | May Queen |
RC | 84 | 282427.6 | 7016941.5 | 517.7 | GDA94_51S | 0.294 |
| HFRC042 | May Queen |
RC | 88 | 282631.5 | 7016175.1 | 508.8 | GDA94_51S | 0.294 |
| HFRC052 | May Queen |
RC | 84 | 282530.7 | 7016116.2 | 506.1 | GDA94_51S | 0.291 |
| HFRC030 | May Queen |
RC | 84 | 281792.6 | 7017588.4 | 520.1 | GDA94_51S | 0.265 |
| HFRC018 | May Queen |
RC | 69 | 282511.9 | 7016197.4 | 507.9 | GDA94_51S | 0.228 |
| HFRC008 | May Queen |
RC | 84 | 281639.9 | 7017636.4 | 520.1 | GDA94_51S | 0.22 |
| HFRC081 | May Queen |
RC | 92 | 282394.1 | 7016918.8 | 516.0 | GDA94_51S | 0.219 |
| 10MWR10 | Unassigned | RAB | 27 | 282547.0 | 7016200.0 | 511.6 | GDA94_51S | 0.209 |
| HFRC090 | May Queen |
RC | 88 | 281242.1 | 7018087.8 | 522.8 | GDA94_51S | 0.209 |
| HFRC074 | May Queen |
RC | 84 | 282343.9 | 7017468.6 | 525.8 | GDA94_51S | 0.205 |
| HFRC014 | May Queen |
RC | 84 | 281779.7 | 7017715.4 | 525.6 | GDA94_51S | 0.193 |
| HFRC056 | May Queen |
RC | 88 | 283042.0 | 7015592.9 | 505.9 | GDA94_51S | 0.184 |
| HFRC088 | May Queen |
RC | 108 | 281231.8 | 7017952.6 | 520.7 | GDA94_51S | 0.177 |
19
| HFRC097 | May Queen |
RC | 84 | 282254.2 | 7017462.9 | 530.0 | GDA94_51S | 0.161 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10MWR66 | Unassigned | RAB | 2 | 282315.0 | 7015980.0 | 506.8 | GDA94_51S | 0.16 |
| 10MWR7 | Unassigned | RAB | 5 | 282842.0 | 7016195.0 | 510.8 | GDA94_51S | 0.157 |
| HFRC031 | May Queen |
RC | 84 | 281839.3 | 7017139.4 | 514.2 | GDA94_51S | 0.139 |
| HFRC045 | May Queen |
RC | 84 | 281741.6 | 7017734.9 | 525.5 | GDA94_51S | 0.11 |
| HFRC100 | Yandal | RC | 84 | 282183.7 | 7017526.7 | 529.2 | GDA94_51S | 0.096 |
| HFRC078 | May Queen |
RC | 84 | 282993.8 | 7015994.2 | 506.1 | GDA94_51S | 0.085 |
| 10MWR14 | Unassigned | RAB | 38 | 282543.0 | 7016001.0 | 508.5 | GDA94_51S | 0.077 |
| HFRC098 | Yandal | RC | 84 | 282266.2 | 7017367.9 | 525.6 | GDA94_51S | 0.074 |
| HFRC066 | May Queen |
RC | 120 | 282201.7 | 7017743.7 | 525.4 | GDA94_51S | 0.072 |
| HFRC075 | May Queen |
RC | 88 | 282891.8 | 7015932.9 | 506.6 | GDA94_51S | 0.072 |
| 10MWR27 | Unassigned | RAB | 2 | 283097.0 | 7015796.0 | 507.1 | GDA94_51S | 0.057 |
| 10MWR68 | Unassigned | RAB | 6 | 282701.0 | 7016199.0 | 511.9 | GDA94_51S | 0.051 |
20
28 November 2024
Appendix A
JORC Code, 2012 Edition (Table 1) – Yandal West
Section 1 Sampling Techniques and Data
(Criteria in this section apply to all succeeding sections.)
| Criteria JORC Code explanation Commentary |
Criteria JORC Code explanation Commentary |
Criteria JORC Code explanation Commentary |
|---|---|---|
| Sampling techniques • Nature and quality of sampling (eg cut channels, random chips, or specific specialised industry standard measurement tools appropriate to the minerals under investigation, such as down hole gamma sondes, or handheld XRF instruments, etc). These examples should not be taken as limiting the broad meaning of sampling. • Include reference to measures taken to ensure sample representivity and the appropriate calibration of any measurement tools or systems used. • Aspects of the determination of mineralisation that are Material to the Public Report. In cases where ‘industry standard’ work has been done this would be relatively simple (eg ‘reverse circulation drilling was used to obtain 1 m samples from which 3 kg was pulverised to produce a 30 g charge for fire assay’). In other cases more explanation may be required, such as where there is coarse gold that has inherent sampling problems. Unusual commodities or mineralisation types (eg submarine nodules) may warrant disclosure of detailed information. Barwidgee Fault RC Drilling • Drill samples were obtained from reverse circulation (RC) holes. • RC samples were collected from the cyclone at 1m intervals in buckets and laid upon the ground in lines of 20-25. A corresponding 2-3kg sub-sample was collected each metre from the cone splitter for laboratory analysis. • Collar locations were recorded with a handheld GPS (+/- 5m accuracy) by the site geologist. Downhole surveys were conducted using a north-seeking Axis gyroscope, which is unaffected by country rock magnetics. Downhole surveys were taken every 10-15m. Harris Find RC and Diamond Drilling • Drill samples were obtained from reverse circulation (RC) and diamond drill (DD) holes. • RC samples were collected from the cyclone at 1m intervals in buckets and laid upon the ground in lines of 20-25. A corresponding2-3kg |
||
-
Criteria JORC Code explanation Commentary sub-sample was collected each metre from the cone splitter for laboratory analysis.
-
• DD was conducted utilising HQ / NQ2 sized core. Core was collected in core trays where it was marked up and logged. Core was cut length ways and half-core sampled.
-
• Collar locations were recorded with a handheld GPS (+/- 5m accuracy) by the site geologist. Downhole surveys were conducted using a north-seeking Axis gyroscope, which is unaffected by country rock magnetics. Downhole surveys were taken every 10-30m.
-
Ives Find RC Drilling • RC drilling was used to obtain pulverised rock sample at 1m intervals of which an approximate 2.5kg sample was taken for 40g fire assay.
-
• Rock chips are collected from outcrop using hammer and the location recorded using GPS. Approximately 1kg of sample was placed in a calico bag and submitted for assay.
-
May Queen RC Drilling • RC drilling was used to obtain 1 m intervals of drill spoil that is placed on the ground.
-
• Two samples of approximately 2.5 kg of drill spoil were collected from a cone splitter attached to the cyclone in 1 metre intervals as the hole is drilled. The samples are put in calico bags and placed with the remaining drill spoil for the relevant meter it was collected.
-
Drilling techniques • Drill type (eg core, reverse circulation, open-hole Barwidgee Fault RC Drilling hammer, rotary air blast, auger, Bangka, sonic, etc) and details (eg core diameter, triple or standard tube, depth • Strike Drilling completed the RC drill
| Criteria | JORC Code explanation | JORC Code explanation | Commentary | Commentary |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| of diamond tails, face-sampling bit or other type, | programme utilising a Schramm T450 Reverse | |||
| whether core is oriented and if so, by what method, | Circulation (RC) Drill Rig. | |||
| etc). | • | RC drill holes were completed using an 143mm | ||
| (5 5/8”) face sampling bit. | ||||
| Harris Find RC and Diamond Drilling | ||||
| • | DDH1 Ltd completed both the DD and RC drill | |||
| programme utilising a Sandvik DE840 |
||||
| Multipurpose Drill Rig. | ||||
| • | RC drilled holes were completed at a standard | |||
| RC drilling diameter of 5.5” using a face | ||||
| sampling bit. | ||||
| • | The DD hole was drilled using a HQ and NQ2 | |||
| diameter drill bit. DD core was orientated | ||||
| utilising a Reflex Act 3 Orientation Tool. | ||||
| Ives Find RC Drilling | ||||
| • | Reverse Circulation (RC) drilling was used to | |||
| collect 1m pulverized rock samples using a face | ||||
| sampling hammer. | ||||
| May Queen RC Drilling | ||||
| • | Reverse Circulation (RC) drilling was used to | |||
| collect 1m pulverized rock samples using a face | ||||
| sampling hammer. | ||||
| Drill sample recovery | • | Method of recording and assessing core and chip | Barwidgee Fault RC Drilling | |
| • | sample recoveries and results assessed. Measures taken to maximise sample recovery and |
• | RC sample recovery, moisture and |
|
| ensure representative nature of the samples. | contamination was visually assessed on a per | |||
| • | Whether a relationship exists between sample recovery | metre basis and recorded by the appointed site | ||
| and grade and whether sample bias may have occurred | geologist. RC recovery was assessed as high. | |||
| due to preferential loss/gain of fine/coarse material. | • | No relationship between sample recovery, | ||
| grade, and sample bias was identified. |
-
Criteria JORC Code explanation Commentary Harris Find RC and Diamond Drilling • RC sample recovery, moisture and contamination was visually assessed on a per metre basis and recorded by the appointed site geologist. RC recovery was assessed as high.
-
• DD core was physically measured and recorded on a metre basis, generally averaging 99%.
-
• No relationship between sample recovery, grade, and sample bias was identified.
Ives Find RC
-
Visual estimates of recovery were made and only recorded where there were significant differences in volumes of chip sample.
-
• Overall sample recovery was considered reasonable to good, and in line with normal expectations for this type of drilling.
-
May Queen RC Drilling
-
Visual estimates of recovery were made and only recorded where there were significant differences in volumes of chip sample.
-
• Overall sample recovery is considered reasonable to good, and in line with normal expectations for this type of drilling.
-
Logging • Whether core and chip samples have been geologically Barwidgee Fault RC Drilling and geotechnically logged to a level of detail to support appropriate Mineral Resource estimation, mining • Each RC sample was sieved (wet and dry), studies and metallurgical studies. logged on a 1 metre scale with regolith,
-
• Whether logging is qualitative or quantitative in nature. lithology, veining, alteration, and mineralisation Core (or costean, channel, etc) photography. recorded.
-
• The total length and percentage of the relevant • Drillhole logging data was recorded within a intersections logged. database. • Logging was qualitative. Chip-trays have been
-
Criteria JORC Code explanation Commentary stored and photos taken for future reference.
-
• All drillholes (100%) were geologically logged on site by a qualified geologist.
Harris Find RC and Diamond Drilling
-
Each RC sample was sieved (wet and dry), logged on a 1 metre scale with regolith, lithology, veining, alteration, and mineralisation recorded.
-
Drill core was logged on a 10cm scale with regolith, lithology, structure, veining, alteration, and mineralisation recorded.
-
Drillhole logging data was recorded within a database.
-
Logging was qualitative. Chip-trays and core trays containing half-core have been stored and photos taken for future reference.
-
All drillholes (100%) were geologically logged on site by a qualified geologist.
Ives Find RC
-
RC drill chips were geologically logged to a level that is considered relevant to the style of mineralization under investigation
-
Paper drill logs were used to record: lithology, mineralogy, mineralization, weathering, colour and other appropriate features.
-
All logging was quantitative.
-
Selected chip samples from each hole were sieved, washed and placed into plastic chip trays for future reference.
May Queen RC Drilling
- RC drill chips have been geologically logged to a
| Criteria | JORC Code explanation | Commentary | |||
| level that is considered relevant to the style of | |||||
| mineralization under investigation | |||||
| • | Paper drill logs were used to record: lithology, | ||||
| mineralogy, mineralization, weathering, colour | |||||
| and other appropriate features. | |||||
| • | All logging was quantitative. | ||||
| • | Selected chip samples from each hole were | ||||
| sieved, washed and placed into plastic chip trays | |||||
| for future reference. | |||||
| Sub-sampling techniques and sample preparation | • | If core, whether cut or sawn and whether quarter, half | Barwidgee Fault RC Drilling | ||
| or all core taken. | |||||
| • | If non-core, whether riffled, tube sampled, rotary split, | • | Representative RC sub-samples were produced | ||
| etc and whether sampled wet or dry. | using a rig mounted cyclone and cone splitter. | ||||
| • | For all sample types, the nature, quality and | Samples were mostly dry. | |||
| appropriateness of the sample preparation technique. | • | RC sampling was deemed an appropriate | |||
| • | Quality control procedures adopted for all sub-sampling | method for gold and base metal exploration. | |||
| stages to maximise representativity of samples. | • | Before each drillhole the cyclone and cone | |||
| • • |
Measures taken to ensure that the sampling is representative of the in situ material collected, including for instance results for field duplicate/second- half sampling. Whether sample sizes are appropriate to the grain size |
• | splitter was inspected for damage, cleanliness, and correct set-up. The cyclone was cleaned with compressed air between (6m) drill runs. RC duplicate samples were collected every 20 |
||
| of the material being sampled. | metres from a second chute on the cone splitter | ||||
| and were assayed to assess sample |
|||||
| representativity. | |||||
| • | Target sub-sample weight for RC samples was | ||||
| 2.5kg. This sample size was considered | |||||
| appropriate for the Archaean gold and base | |||||
| metal mineralisation. | |||||
| Harris Find RC and Diamond Drilling | |||||
| • | DD core was cut in half lengthways using an | ||||
| Almonte core-saw. Half core was taken for assay | |||||
| analysis and half core retained. Core was cut off- | |||||
| site byDynamics G-Ex PtyLtd. | |||||
| 26 |
-
Criteria JORC Code explanation Commentary • Representative RC sub-samples were produced using a rig mounted cyclone and cone splitter. Samples were mostly dry.
-
• Both DD and RC sampling is an appropriate method for gold and base metal exploration.
-
• Before each drillhole the cyclone and cone splitter has been inspected for damage, cleanliness, and correct set-up. The cyclone was cleaned with compressed air between (6m) drill runs.
-
• RC duplicate samples were collected every 20 metres from a second chute on the cone splitter and will be assayed to determine sample representativity. No DD core duplicates were taken in the field.
-
• Target sub-sample weight for RC samples was 2.5kg. DD core sampling intervals are >0.4m and <1.5m to ensure sample weights of 1.4-4kg. This sample size was considered appropriate for the Archaean gold and base metal mineralisation.
Ives Find RC
- The sample material is collected by passing the drill spoil through a riffle splitter integrated into the drill rig cyclone at 1m intervals to collect an approximate 2.5kg sample in a calico bag.
May Queen RC Drilling
- The holes were sampled by collecting approximately 500 g from each 1 m interval of drill spoil using a PVC “spear” then combined into 4m intervals to produce an interval sample of approximately 2 to 3 kg to be submitted to the laboratory for assay which is appropriate for
| Criteria | JORC Code explanation | Commentary | |||
| gold analysis. | |||||
| • | The Wet samples were left to dry before taking | ||||
| interval samples. | |||||
| • | The Company utilizes interval sampling for first | ||||
| pass assessment of drill holes to control costs. | |||||
| This type of sampling should be considered | |||||
| indicative only and not suitable for resource | |||||
| calculations when used for gold. | |||||
| • | The Company submits the 1m riffle split | ||||
| samples where 4 interval samples are 100 ppb | |||||
| gold or higher. The 1m samples are considered | |||||
| by the Company as definitive. | |||||
| Quality of assay data and laboratory tests | • | The nature, quality and appropriateness of the assaying | Barwidgee Fault RC Drilling |
||
| and laboratory procedures used and whether the technique is considered partial or total. |
• | Samples were assessed by ALS Perth (WA) using | |||
| • | For geophysical tools, spectrometers, handheld XRF | the following analysis techniques: | |||
| instruments, etc, the parameters used in determining | • | Au-ICP21 (gold analysis): A 30g nominal sample | |||
| the analysis including instrument make and model, | weight is taken and analysed via fire assay | ||||
| reading times, calibrations factors applied and their | fusion with ICP-AES (inductively couple plasma | ||||
| derivation, etc. | – atomic emission spectrometry) analytical | ||||
| • | Nature of quality control procedures adopted (eg standards, blanks, duplicates, external laboratory checks) and whether acceptable levels of accuracy (i.e. lack of bias) and precision have been established. |
• | method. This is an industry standard technique for assessing Au mineralisation. ME-ICP61 (multi-element analysis): 0.25g sub- |
||
| sample prepared via Four-Acid digestion with | |||||
| ICP-AES (inductively coupled plasma – atomic | |||||
| emission spectrometry) analysis. Four-Acid | |||||
| Digestion is an industry standard technique and | |||||
| considered to be a near-total digestion. | |||||
| • | Al, Ca, Fe, K, Mg, Na, S & Ti were reported in | ||||
| percent (%) all other analytes reported in parts | |||||
| per million (ppm). The elements assayed were: | |||||
| Au, Ag, Al, As, B, Ba, Be, Bi, Ca, Cd, Co, Cr, Cu, Fe, | |||||
| Ga, K, La, Li, Mg, Mn, Mo, Na, Ni, P, Pb, Pd, Pt, S, | |||||
| Sb,Sc,Sr,Th,Ti,Tl,U,V,W & Zn. | |||||
| 28 |
- Criteria JORC Code explanation Commentary • No geophysical tools were used. • Field introduced standards have been inserted at an average rate of 1:20. These are either CRMs or blanks. Acceptable levels of accuracy and precision have been demonstrated and no bias noted. Internal laboratory QAQC protocols were also been relied upon to assess the quality of the data and deemed acceptable.
Harris Find RC and Diamond Drilling
-
Samples were assessed by ALS Perth (WA) using the following analysis techniques:
-
• ME-ICP61 multielement analysis: 0.25g subsample prepared via Four-Acid digestion with ICP-AES (inductively coupled plasma – atomic emission spectrometry) analysis. Four-Acid Digestion is an industry standard technique and considered to be a near-total digestion.
-
Au-AA25/26 for Au: 30g/50g sample taken and analysed via fire assay with AAS (atomic absorption spectrometry) finish. This is an industry standard technique when assessing ore-grade Au mineralisation.
-
Al, Ca, Fe, K, Mg, Na, S & Ti were reported in percent (%) all other analytes reported in parts per million (ppm). The elements assayed were: Au, Ag, Al, As, B, Ba, Be, Bi, Ca, Cd, Co, Cr, Cu, Fe, Ga, K, La, Li, Mg, Mn, Mo, Na, Ni, P, Pb, Pd, Pt, S, Sb, Sc, Sr, Th, Ti, Tl, U, V, W & Zn.
-
No geophysical tools were used.
-
Field introduced standards have been inserted at an average rate of 1:20. These are either CRMs or blanks. Acceptable levels of accuracy and precision have been demonstrated and no
| Criteria | JORC Code explanation | Commentary | Commentary |
|---|---|---|---|
| bias noted. Internal laboratory QAQC protocols | |||
| have also been relied upon to assess the quality | |||
| of the data. This has also been reviewed by GTE | |||
| and deemed acceptable. | |||
| Ives | Find RC Assays | ||
| • | Bureau Veritas Minerals (“BVM”), Canning Vale | ||
| WA was contracted to carry out the sample prep | |||
| and analysis, an accredited laboratory | |||
| • | Samples analysed using 40g fire assay for total | ||
| separation of Gold, Platinum and Palladium. | |||
| • | Submission of 1 duplicate and 1 standard or | ||
| blank was inserted into the sample submission | |||
| stream for every 20 samples for QAQC | |||
| purposes. | |||
| • | No umpire or third-party assay checks were | ||
| completed. | |||
| May | Queen RC Drilling | ||
| • | Bureau Veritas Minerals (“BVM”), Canning Vale | ||
| WA was contracted to carry out the sample prep | |||
| and analysis., an accredited laboratory | |||
| • | 4m interval samples were assayed using 40 g | ||
| Aqua Regia with ICP-MS for Au (1 ppb), Sn (0.2 | |||
| ppm), W (0.1 ppm) with additional elements | |||
| using ICP-OES (Ag, As, Co, Cu, Li, Mo, Ni, Pb , | |||
| Zn,). | |||
| • | As the Aqua Regia is not a total digest, many | ||
| elements will be only partially extracted. | |||
| • | The 1m interval samples have been analysed by | ||
| Firing a 40 gm (approx.) portion of the sample. | |||
| Lower sample weights may be employed for | |||
| samples with very high sulphide and metal | |||
| contents. This is the classical fire assay process |
| Criteria | JORC Code explanation | Commentary | |||
| and will give total separation of Gold, Platinum | |||||
| and Palladium in the sample | |||||
| • | Submission of 1 duplicate and 1 blank was | ||||
| inserted into the sample submission stream for | |||||
| every 20 samples which the company considers | |||||
| adequate QAQC for non-resource samples. | |||||
| • | Standard samples were not submitted, and | ||||
| relied on the laboratory supplied standards for | |||||
| QAQC purposes. | |||||
| • | No umpire or third-party assay checks were | ||||
| completed. | |||||
| Verification of sampling and assaying | • | The verification of significant intersections by either | Barwidgee Fault RC Drilling | ||
| • | independent or alternative company personnel. The use of twinned holes. |
• | Significant intersections are tabulated in the | ||
| • | Documentation of primary data, data entry procedures, | body of the announcement, and Table 1. These | |||
| data verification, data storage (physical and electronic) | composite intersections were recalculated by | ||||
| protocols. | an independent consultant and competent | ||||
| • | Discuss any adjustment to assay data. | person for Albion Resources which verify | |||
| composites reported previously by Great | |||||
| Western Exploration | |||||
| • | No twinned holes were completed. | ||||
| • | Field data was recoded electronically and | ||||
| backed up in off-site secure servers. Field data | |||||
| is then loaded to an SQL database, operated, | |||||
| and maintained by Geobase Australia. All | |||||
| database processes are logged and time | |||||
| stamped. | |||||
| • | No adjustments were made to assay data. | ||||
| Harris | Find RC and Diamond Drilling | ||||
| • | Significant intersections are tabulated in the | ||||
| body of the announcement, and Table 1. These | |||||
| composite intersections were recalculated by | |||||
| an independent consultant and competent | |||||
| 31 |
-
Criteria JORC Code explanation Commentary person for Albion Resources which verify composites reported previously by Great Western Exploration.
-
• No twinned holes were completed. • Field data was recoded electronically and backed up in off-site secure servers. Field data is then loaded to an SQL database, operated and maintained by Geobase Australia. All database processes are logged and time stamped.
-
No adjustments were made to assay data.
Ives Find RC
-
Significant assays are checked in the field by the the appointed competent person for Great Western Explloration.
-
Primary data is collected in the field on paper logs then entered into the database later. The data is verified by the geologist by cross checking the electronic data against the paper copies.
-
Assay data is received by email in electronic text file format with the lab retaining an original back up if required.
-
• No adjustments were made to the assay data reported.
-
Significant intersections are tabulated in the body of the announcement, and Table 1. These composite intersections were recalculated by an independent consultant and competent person for Albion Resources which verify composites reported previously by Great Western Exploration.
-
• Validation of both the field and laboratory data
-
Criteria JORC Code explanation Commentary is undertaken prior to reporting of the data.
-
May Queen RC Drilling • Significant intersections of 4m composites were re-sampled in 1m intervals and compared to the geology in the field by the appointed project geologist for Great Western Exploration
-
• Significant assays are checked in the field by the appointed competent person for Great Western Exploration.
-
• Two holes were scissor hole HFRC022 and HFRC023.
-
• Primary data is collected in the field on paper logs then entered into the database at a later date. The data is verified by the geologist by cross checking the electronic data against the paper copies.
-
• Assay data is received by email in electronic text file format with the lab retaining an original back up if required.
-
• No adjustments were made to the assay data reported.
-
• Validation of both the field and laboratory data is undertaken prior to reporting of the data.
-
• Significant intersections are tabulated in the body of the announcement, and Table 1. These composite intersections were recalculated by an independent consultant and competent person for Albion Resources which verify composites reported previously by Great Western Exploration.
-
•
-
Location of data points • Accuracy and quality of surveys used to locate drill Barwidgee Fault RC Drilling holes (collar and down-hole surveys), trenches, mine
| Criteria | JORC Code explanation | JORC Code explanation | Commentary | Commentary |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| workings and other locations used in Mineral Resource | • | Drill hole collars were located using a handheld | ||
| estimation. | GPS with +/- 5m accuracy in plan. This accuracy | |||
| • | Specification of the grid system used. | is acceptable for exploration drilling. Downhole | ||
| • | Quality and adequacy of topographic control. | surveys have been conducted using an Axis | ||
| gyroscope. | ||||
| • | Grid: MGA, Datum: GDA94, Zone: 51 | |||
| • | Drill hole collar elevations have been assigned | |||
| using the Company’s digital elevation model | ||||
| derived from helicopter-borne radar altimeter | ||||
| (RA) (accuracy +/- 0.5m). | ||||
| Harris Find RC and Diamond Drilling | ||||
| • | Drill hole collars were located using a handheld | |||
| GPS with +/- 5m accuracy in plan. This accuracy | ||||
| is acceptable for exploration drilling. Downhole | ||||
| surveys have been conducted using an Axis | ||||
| gyroscope. | ||||
| Ives Find RC | ||||
| • | Drill hole collars were determined using a | |||
| hand-held GPS (+/- 6 m accuracy in all | ||||
| directions). | ||||
| • | Elevation is measured from topographic maps | |||
| • | The grid system used is MGA 94 (Zone 51). | |||
| • | Various topographic data was noted for | |||
| mapping purposes. | ||||
| May Queen RC Drilling | ||||
| • | Drill hole collars were determined using a | |||
| handheld GPS (+/- 6 m accuracy in all | ||||
| directions). | ||||
| • | Elevation is measured from topographic maps | |||
| • | The grid system used is MGA 94 (Zone 51). | |||
| • | Various topographic data was noted for |
| Criteria | JORC Code explanation | JORC Code explanation | Commentary | Commentary |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| mapping purposes. | ||||
| Data spacing and distribution | • | Data spacing for reporting of Exploration Results. | Barwidgee Fault RC Drilling | |
| • | Whether the data spacing and distribution is sufficient to establish the degree of geological and grade |
• | For the Barwidgee Fault drilling on section | |
| continuity appropriate for the Mineral Resource and | spacing is 50m, and between-section spacing is | |||
| Ore Reserve estimation procedure(s) and classifications | 40m-6000m. Exploration drill hole collar | |||
| applied. | locations are shown in Figure 4. | |||
| • | Whether sample compositing has been applied. | • | Drill spacing was for exploration purposes and | |
| not at a sufficient density for Resource | ||||
| Estimation or Ore Reserves Estimation. | ||||
| • | No sample compositing was applied. | |||
| Harris Find RC and Diamond Drilling | ||||
| • | On section spacing was 15m, and between- | |||
| section spacing is 15m-20m. Exploration drill | ||||
| hole collar locations are shown in Figure 4. | ||||
| • | Drill spacing is for exploration purposes and | |||
| not at a sufficient density for Resource | ||||
| Estimation or Ore Reserves Estimation. | ||||
| • | No sample compositing has been applied. | |||
| Ives Find RC | ||||
| • | See Figure 5 in the main body of the | |||
| announcement. | ||||
| • | The data spacing, and distribution is not | |||
| enough to determine any grade or geological | ||||
| continuity and therefore resource estimates | ||||
| cannot be calculated at this stage. | ||||
| May Queen RC Drilling | ||||
| • | The RC drilling has been designed to test | |||
| exploration targets and have not yet reached | ||||
| the stage of set pattern drilling required for | ||||
| resource calculations. |
| Criteria | JORC Code explanation | JORC Code explanation | Commentary | Commentary |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| • | The company carried out single lines of holes | |||
| with holes spaced nominally 40m apart drilled | ||||
| to 80m depth so that the geological sequence | ||||
| is full covered (angle overlap). | ||||
| • | Sample compositing has been applied initially. | |||
| 4m composite samples > 0.1 g/t Au were re- | ||||
| sampled at 1 m intervals. See sampling | ||||
| techniques for details. | ||||
| • | The 4m interval samples are not suitable for | |||
| determining gold resources. | ||||
| • | The sampling method was considered to be | |||
| unbiased. | ||||
| • | The relationship to geological structures and | |||
| orientation is unknown apart from local | ||||
| geological information that was recorded at | ||||
| the sample point. | ||||
| • | The company is not planning to calculate | |||
| resources until more drilling is completed and | ||||
| significant intersections sampled at 1m | ||||
| intervals or less. | ||||
| • | Great Western Exploration has not undertaken | |||
| appropriate measures that would enable a | ||||
| Mineral Resource and Ore Reserve estimation | ||||
| procedure(s) and classification to be applied. | ||||
| • | See Figure 6 in the main body of the | |||
| announcement. | ||||
| Orientation of data in relation to geological | • | Whether the orientation of sampling achieves unbiased | Barwidgee Fault RC Drilling | |
| structure | sampling of possible structures and the extent to which this is known, considering the deposit type. |
• | Drilling was designed perpendicular to the | |
| • | If the relationship between the drilling orientation and | modelled mineralised structures to achieve | ||
| the orientation of key mineralised structures is | unbiased sampling. | |||
| considered to have introduced a sampling bias, this | • | No orientation sampling bias was introduced. | ||
| should be assessed and reported if material. | ||||
| Harris | Find RC and Diamond Drilling |
| Criteria | JORC Code explanation | JORC Code explanation | Commentary | Commentary |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| • | The company carried out single lines of holes | |||
| with holes spaced nominally 40m apart drilled | ||||
| to 80m depth so that the geological sequence | ||||
| is full covered (angle overlap). | ||||
| • | Sample compositing has been applied initially. | |||
| 4m composite samples > 0.1 g/t Au were re- | ||||
| sampled at 1 m intervals. See sampling | ||||
| techniques for details. | ||||
| • | The 4m interval samples are not suitable for | |||
| determining gold resources. | ||||
| • | The sampling method was considered to be | |||
| unbiased. | ||||
| • | The relationship to geological structures and | |||
| orientation is unknown apart from local | ||||
| geological information that was recorded at | ||||
| the sample point. | ||||
| • | The company is not planning to calculate | |||
| resources until more drilling is completed and | ||||
| significant intersections sampled at 1m | ||||
| intervals or less. | ||||
| • | Great Western Exploration has not undertaken | |||
| appropriate measures that would enable a | ||||
| Mineral Resource and Ore Reserve estimation | ||||
| procedure(s) and classification to be applied. | ||||
| • | See Figure 6 in the main body of the | |||
| announcement. | ||||
| Orientation of data in relation to geological | • | Whether the orientation of sampling achieves unbiased | Barwidgee Fault RC Drilling | |
| structure | sampling of possible structures and the extent to which this is known, considering the deposit type. |
• | Drilling was designed perpendicular to the | |
| • | If the relationship between the drilling orientation and | modelled mineralised structures to achieve | ||
| the orientation of key mineralised structures is | unbiased sampling. | |||
| considered to have introduced a sampling bias, this | • | No orientation sampling bias was introduced. | ||
| should be assessed and reported if material. | ||||
| Harris | Find RC and Diamond Drilling |
| Criteria | JORC Code explanation | Commentary | |||
| • | Drilling was designed perpendicular to the | ||||
| modelled mineralised structures to achieve | |||||
| unbiased sampling. | |||||
| • | Not applicable – mineralised structures yet to | ||||
| be modelled as assay results not received. | |||||
| Ives Find RC | |||||
| • | The drilling is early stage and not adequately | ||||
| spaced therefore the identification of the key | |||||
| geological features have not yet been | |||||
| determined with any confidence. | |||||
| May Queen RC Drilling | |||||
| • | The Competent Person appointed by Great | ||||
| Western Exploration who completed the | |||||
| drilling, using their experience and | |||||
| interpretation, considers the orientation of key | |||||
| structures and any relationship to | |||||
| mineralisation at May Queen as preliminary | |||||
| and inferred. | |||||
| • | No sampling bias resulting from a structural | ||||
| orientation is known to occur at this stage. | |||||
| • | The majority of the drilling is early stage and | ||||
| not adequately spaced therefore the | |||||
| identification of the key geological features | |||||
| have not yet been determined with any | |||||
| confidence. | |||||
| Sample security | • | The measures taken to ensure sample security. | Barwidgee Fault RC Drilling | ||
| • | RC samples were securely packed on site and | ||||
| either delivered to the laboratory (ALS Perth, | |||||
| WA) by a commercial freight carrier, or by field | |||||
| staff. | |||||
| Harris Find RC and Diamond Drilling | |||||
| 37 |
-
Criteria JORC Code explanation Commentary • RC samples were securely packed on site and either delivered to the laboratory (ALS Perth, WA) by a commercial freight carrier, or field crews supervision the programme.
-
• DD core was transported to Dynamics G-Ex Pty Ltd (Kalgoorlie) for cutting before being transported by a commercial freight carried to ALS Perth.
-
Ives Find RC • The chain of custody was managed by Great Western Exploration
-
• The samples were collected into polywoven bags that were secured with cable ties then taken to Wiluna to be dispatched directly to the lab in Perth by courier. The samples are left unattended in the locked yard at the Courier depot prior to dispatch.
-
May Queen RC Drilling • The chain of custody was managed by Great Western Exploration.
-
• The samples were collected into polywoven bags that were secured with cable ties then taken to Wiluna to be dispatched directly to the lab in Perth by courier. The samples are left unattended in the locked yard at the Courier depot prior to dispatch.
-
Audits or reviews • The results of any audits or reviews of sampling Barwidgee Fault RC Drilling techniques and data.
-
The chain of custody was managed by Great Western Exploration
-
• The samples were collected into polywoven bags that were secured with cable ties then taken to Wiluna to be dispatched directly to the lab in Perth by courier. The samples are left unattended in the locked yard at the Courier depot prior to dispatch.
-
The samples were collected into polywoven bags that were secured with cable ties then taken to Wiluna to be dispatched directly to the lab in Perth by courier. The samples are left unattended in the locked yard at the Courier depot prior to dispatch.
-
No specific external audits or reviews were undertaken on the drill data.
-
The drill data has been reviewed internally by the Senior Exploration Geologist.
| Criteria | JORC Code explanation | Commentary | Commentary |
|---|---|---|---|
| Harris Find RC and Diamond Drilling | |||
| • | No specific external audits or reviews have | ||
| been undertaken on the drill data. | |||
| • | The drill data has been reviewed internally by | ||
| the Senior Exploration Geologist for Great | |||
| Western Exploration. | |||
| Ives Find RC | |||
| • | No audits or reviews have been undertaken at | ||
| this early stage. | |||
| May Queen RC Drilling | |||
| • | No audits or reviews were undertaken due to | ||
| the early stage of exploration. |
Section 2 Reporting of Exploration Results
(Criteria listed in the preceding section also apply to this section.)
| Criteria JORC Code explanation Commentary |
Criteria JORC Code explanation Commentary |
Criteria JORC Code explanation Commentary |
Criteria JORC Code explanation Commentary |
Criteria JORC Code explanation Commentary |
Criteria JORC Code explanation Commentary |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mineral tenement and land tenure status • Type, reference name/number, location and ownership including agreements or material issues with third parties such as joint ventures, partnerships, overriding royalties, native title interests, historical sites, wilderness or national park and environmental settings. • The security of the tenure held at the time of reporting along with any known impediments to obtaining a licence to operate in the area. • The Yandal West Project is located 70km south-east of Wiluna, WA. The tenements within the project are listed below. Extension of Term submitted (19/09/2024) • GTE has 80% ownership tenements E 53/1612 and E 53/1816 (20%Diversified Asset Holdings Pty Ltd). The listed holder of E 53/1369, Vanguard Exploration Ltd, is a 100% owned subsidiary of GTE and the transfer of title is currently in progress to Great Western Exploration as part of an internal restructure. • The tenement is within the Determined Kultju (Aboriginal Corporation) Native Title Claim with whom GTE have an executed Regional Land Access Agreement. • Land access agreement with Barwidgee Pastoral Lease. • No other encumbrances are known. The tenements are in good standing. Tenement Holder Expires GTE Ownership Area (Ha) E 53/1369 Vanguard Exploration Ltd 24/9/2024 100% 2446 E 53/1612 Great Western Exploration Ltd 17/10/2025 80% 2446 E53/1816 Great Western Exploration Ltd 3/02/2025 80% 1222 |
• The Yandal West Project is located 70km south-east of Wiluna, WA. The tenements within the project are listed below. |
||||
| Tenement | Holder | Expires | GTE **Ownership ** |
Area (Ha) | |
| E 53/1369 | Vanguard Exploration Ltd |
24/9/2024* | 100% | 2446 | |
| E 53/1612 | Great Western Exploration Ltd |
17/10/2025 | 80% | 2446 | |
| E53/1816 | Great Western Exploration Ltd |
3/02/2025 | 80% | 1222 |
| Criteria | JORC Code explanation | Commentary | ||||
| Exploration done by other parties | • | Acknowledgment and appraisal of exploration by other | • | All exploration work at the Yandal West Project | ||
| parties. | area reported in this announcement was | |||||
| completed by the current tenement holders | ||||||
| Great Western Exploration and subsidiary | ||||||
| Vanguard Resources as well as previous | ||||||
| explorers Great Central Mines. For clarity, no | ||||||
| work has been completed on the project to | ||||||
| data by Albion Resources | ||||||
| Geology | • | Deposit type, geological setting and style of | Barwidee Fault, Harris Find, and May Queen | |||
| mineralisation. | • | The Project is located along the western | ||||
| margin of the Archaean Yandal Greenstone | ||||||
| Belt. The regional-scale Moiler’s Fault crosscuts | ||||||
| the province in a south-easterly direction; with | ||||||
| a dominantly mafic sequence to west of the | ||||||
| fault, and a felsic volcanic-sedimentary | ||||||
| sequence interlayered with mafic volcanic | ||||||
| rocks, to the east of the fault. | ||||||
| Ives Find | ||||||
| • | Mineralisation is located within sheared lodes | |||||
| within a granitic host, along a contact with | ||||||
| Archean Greenstone. | ||||||
| Drill hole Information | • | A summary of all information material to the | Barwidgee Fault RC Drilling | |||
| understanding of the exploration results including a tabulation of the following information for all Material |
• | All drillhole details are tabulated within Table | ||||
| drill holes: | 2. | |||||
o |
easting and northing of the drill hole collar | • | All material information has been disclosed. | |||
o |
elevation or RL (Reduced Level – elevation above sea level in metres) of the drill hole collar |
Harris Find RC and Diamond Drilling | ||||
o |
dip and azimuth of the hole | • | All drillhole details are tabulated within Table | |||
o |
down hole length and interception depth | 2. | ||||
o |
hole length. | • | All material information has been disclosed. | |||
| • | If the exclusion of this information is justified on the basis that the information is not Material and this |
Ives Find | ||||
| exclusion does not detractfrom the understanding of | ||||||
| 41 |
| Criteria | JORC Code explanation | Commentary | Commentary |
|---|---|---|---|
| the report, the Competent Person should clearly explain | • |
Table 2 is the summary of the drill hole collar | |
| why this is the case. | data | ||
| • | Easting and northing coordinates were | ||
| obtained using a hand-held GPS (+/- 6 m | |||
| accuracy in all directions). | |||
| • | Elevation is obtained from topographic maps | ||
| and Google Earth | |||
| • | Down hole surveys were completed at intervals | ||
| roughly every 50m and EOH using a Reflex Ez- | |||
| Trak multi shot down-hole camera. | |||
| • | The drill collar azimuth is established using a | ||
| compass and the dip using a clinometer. | |||
| • | Drill holes were orientated to intersect the | ||
| main geological trend. However, some | |||
| geological structures are not fully understood | |||
| to date. Factors including dip, direction etc. still | |||
| requires further evaluation, therefore all | |||
| reported intercepts are based on down hole | |||
| lengths. | |||
| May | Queen RC Drilling | ||
| • | Table 2 is the summary of the drill hole collar | ||
| data | |||
| • | Easting and northing coordinates were | ||
| obtained using a hand held GPS (+/- 6 m | |||
| accuracy in all directions). | |||
| • | Elevation is obtained from topographic maps | ||
| and Google Earth | |||
| • | Down hole surveys were completed at intervals | ||
| roughly every 50m and EOH using a Reflex Ez- | |||
| Trak multi shot down-hole camera. | |||
| • | The drill collar azimuth is established using a | ||
| compass and the dip using a clinometer. | |||
| • | Drilling, for the most part, was orientated to | ||
| investigate true width intersections. However, |
| Criteria | JORC Code explanation | JORC Code explanation | Commentary | Commentary |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| some geological structures are not fully | ||||
| understood to date. Factors including dip, | ||||
| direction etc. still requires further evaluation, | ||||
| therefore all reported intercepts are based on | ||||
| down hole lengths. | ||||
| Data aggregation methods | • | In reporting Exploration Results, weighting averaging | Barwidgee Fault RC Drilling | |
| techniques, maximum and/or minimum grade truncations (eg cutting of high grades) and cut-off |
• | Material/anomalous results defined at 0.5, 1.0 | ||
| grades are usually Material and should be stated. | and 5.0 g/t Au cut-off listed in Table 1. | |||
| • | Where aggregate intercepts incorporate short lengths | • | Reported results were weighted averaged, with | |
| of high grade results and longer lengths of low grade | up to 2m of internal dilution incorporated into | |||
| results, the procedure used for such aggregation should | reported result. | |||
| • | be stated and some typical examples of such aggregations should be shown in detail. The assumptions used for any reporting of metal equivalent values should be clearly stated. |
• • |
Reported intercepts do not incorporate shorter intercepts. Metal equivalents were not reported. |
|
| Harris Find RC and Diamond Drilling | ||||
| • | Drill hole intersections have been calculated | |||
| using a 0.5 and 5.0 g/t Au cut-off grade using a | ||||
| maximum of 1m of internal dilution and | ||||
| reported in Table 1 | ||||
| • | Reported results were weighted averaged, with | |||
| up to 2m of internal dilution incorporated into | ||||
| reported result. | ||||
| • | Reported intercepts do not incorporate shorter | |||
| intercepts. | ||||
| • | Metal equivalents were not reported. | |||
| Ives Find RC | ||||
| • | Gold intersections are reported as down hole | |||
| length weighted averages using the max assay | ||||
| value. | ||||
| • | No top cuts were applied. | |||
| • | Drill hole intersections have been calculated | |||
| usinga 0.2,0.5,1.0,4.0 and 5.0g/t Au cut-off |
| Criteria | JORC Code explanation | JORC Code explanation | Commentary | Commentary |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| grade using a maximum of 1m of internal | ||||
| dilution and reported in Table 1 | ||||
| • | No metal equivalents were stated | |||
| • | Assay results are reported in summary form | |||
| only, which is considered appropriate for this | ||||
| early stage of exploration. | ||||
| May Queen RC Drilling | ||||
| • | Individual gold and silver grades are reported | |||
| as down hole length weighted averages using | ||||
| the max assay value. | ||||
| • | No top cuts were applied. | |||
| • | Drill hole intersections have been calculated | |||
| using a 0.2, 0.5, 1.0, 4.0 and 5.0 g/t Au cut-off | ||||
| grade using a maximum of 2m of internal | ||||
| dilution and reported in Table 1 | ||||
| • | No metal equivalents were stated. | |||
| • | Assay results are reported in summary form | |||
| only, which is considered appropriate for this | ||||
| early stage of exploration. | ||||
| Relationship between mineralisation widths and | • | These relationships are particularly important in the | Barwidgee Fault RC Drilling | |
| intercept lengths | • | reporting of Exploration Results. If the geometry of the mineralisation with respect to |
• | Down-hole lengths are reported as the |
| the drill hole angle is known, its nature should be | mineralised structures are not well enough | |||
| reported. | understood to determine true widths. | |||
| • | If it is not known and only the down hole lengths are | • | The Barwidgee Fault Structure is interpreted to | |
| reported, there should be a clear statement to this | dip steeply to the west. The angle of reported | |||
| effect (eg ‘down hole length, true width not known’). | drill-intercepts is unlikely to differ materially | |||
| from down-hole lengths. | ||||
| Harris Find RC and Diamond Drilling | ||||
| • | Down-hole lengths were reported as the | |||
| mineralised structure is not well enough | ||||
| understood to determine true widths. |
| Criteria | JORC Code explanation | JORC Code explanation | Commentary | Commentary |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| • | Harris’ Find Structure interpreted as being sub- | |||
| vertical; angle of reported drill-intercepts | ||||
| unlikely to differ materially from down-hole | ||||
| lengths. | ||||
| Ives Find RC | ||||
| • | All reported intercepts are based on down hole | |||
| lengths. The detailed geometry of the | ||||
| mineralized zones is not fully understood at | ||||
| this stage. | ||||
| • | Accordingly, the reported intercept lengths may | |||
| not reflect true mineralization widths. | ||||
| May Queen RC Drilling | ||||
| • | All reported intercepts are based on down hole | |||
| lengths. The detailed geometry of the | ||||
| mineralized zones is not fully understood at | ||||
| this stage. | ||||
| • | Accordingly, the reported intercept lengths | |||
| may not reflect true mineralization widths. | ||||
| Diagrams | • | Appropriate maps and sections (with scales) and | Barwidgee Fault RC Drilling | |
| tabulations of intercepts should be included for any significant discovery being reported These should |
• | Locations of the RAB drilling is shown in Figure | ||
| include, but not be limited to a plan view of drill hole | 4 of the main body of the announcement and | |||
| collar locations and appropriate sectional views. | Table 2. | |||
| Barwidgee Fault Rock-Chips | ||||
| • | Locations of the rock-chips is shown in Figure 4 | |||
| of the main body of the announcement and | ||||
| Table 2. | ||||
| Harris Find RC and Diamond Drilling | ||||
| • | Drilling locations are found in Figure 4 of the | |||
| main body of the announcement and Table 2. |
| Criteria | JORC Code explanation | Commentary | |||
| Ives Find RC | |||||
| • | Maps and sections can be found in Figure 5 | ||||
| and Table 2. | |||||
| May | Queen RC Drilling | ||||
| • | Maps and sections can be found in Figure 6 | ||||
| and Table 2. | |||||
| Balanced reporting | • | Where comprehensive reporting of all Exploration | Barwidgee Fault RC Drilling | ||
| Results is not practicable, representative reporting of both low and high grades and/or widths should be |
• | All completed drillholes shown in Table 2 and | |||
| practiced to avoid misleading reporting of Exploration | significant assay results appear in Table 1. | ||||
| Results. | |||||
| Harris Find RC and Diamond Drilling | |||||
| • | All completed drillholes shown in Table 2 and | ||||
| significant assay results appear in Table 1. | |||||
| Ives Find RC | |||||
| • | All completed drillholes shown in Table 2 and | ||||
| significant assay results appear in Table 1. | |||||
| May | Queen RC Drilling | ||||
| • | All completed drillholes shown in Table 2 and | ||||
| significant assay results appear in Table 1. | |||||
| • | Maximum gold assay result illustrated in Figure | ||||
| 6 appear in Table 3. | |||||
| Other substantive exploration data | • | Other exploration data, if meaningful and material, | Comprehensive descriptions of previous exploration | ||
| should be reported including (but not limited to): | work can be found in the following Great Western | ||||
| geological observations; geophysical survey results; | Exploration (ASX:GTE) ASX Announcements: | ||||
| geochemical survey results; bulk samples – size and method of treatment; metallurgical test results; bulk density, groundwater, geotechnical and rock characteristics; potential deleterious or contaminating |
• • • |
26/04/2016 – Potential Gold Acquisition 16/01/2017 - Ives Drilling Update 15/02/2017 - Positive Results from Drilling at |
|||
| substances. | Ives Find | ||||
| 46 |
| Criteria | JORC Code explanation | Commentary | ||
| • | 29/03/2017 - High Grade Gold at Ives Find | |||
| • | 10/04/2017 - 6 km Gold Trend Identified at | |||
| Yandal West | ||||
| • | 17/05/2017 - Soil Sampling Commenced at | |||
| Yandal West | ||||
| • | 5/07/2017 - Soil Sampling Identifies a 9 km Gold | |||
| Trend at Yandal West | ||||
| • | 1/08/2017 - Aeromag Highlights Exciting Gold | |||
| Areas at Yandal West | ||||
| • | 4/09/2017 - Further Strong Gold Results from | |||
| Infill Soils at Yandal West | ||||
| • | 19/10/2017 - Drilling to Commence at Yandal | |||
| West Gold Project | ||||
| • | 29/11/2017 - Greenfields Gold Discovery at | |||
| Yandal West Project | ||||
| • | 30/01/2018 - Further Strong Results and High- | |||
| Grade Gold at Yandal West | ||||
| • | 14/05/2018 - Further High-Grade Gold & | |||
| Recommencement of Drilling at Yandal West | ||||
| • | 13/02/2019 - High-Grade Gold Continues at | |||
| Yandal West Gold Project | ||||
| • | 8/04/2019 - High Impact Drilling to test Jundee | |||
| Gold Analogue set to commence | ||||
| • | 16/07/2019 - Initial Results from latest RC | |||
| Drilling at Yandal West | ||||
| • | 23/09/2019 - Re-Release: Multiple Gold Bearing | |||
| Shear Zones at Yandal West | ||||
| • | 31/10/2019 - High-Grade Gold Outcropping at | |||
| Yandal West and Drilling to Recommence | ||||
| • | 11/11/2019 - Harris Find High Grade Gold | |||
| Target and Drilling completed at Yandal West | ||||
| • | 27/11/2019 - Further Gold Intersected at Yandal | |||
| West and VMS Potential Identified | ||||
| • | 20/12/2019 - Further samplingconfirms High | |||
| 47 |
| Criteria | JORC Code explanation | Commentary | |||
| Grade Gold at Yandal West | |||||
| • | 6/10/2021 - EM Survey Defines Discrete, | ||||
| Conspicuous and Shallow VMS Targets at Yandal | |||||
| West | |||||
| • | 25/10/2021 - Two Additional Priority One VMS | ||||
| Targets, Daddy Long Legs and Redback, | |||||
| Defined at Yandal West | |||||
| • | 21/6/2022 - Commencement of Drilling - | ||||
| Yandal West | |||||
| • | 21/7/2022 - Multiple Sulphide Drill | ||||
| Intersections at Yandal West | |||||
| • | 31/8/2022 - Significant Gold Intercepts From | ||||
| Harris’ Find Drilling | |||||
| • | 15/9/2022 - Interpreted Extension of Highly | ||||
| Prospective Barwidgee Structure | |||||
| • | 8/12/2022 - Phase 2 Extension Drilling | ||||
| Commences at Harris’ Find | |||||
| • | 31/1/2023 - Completion of Drilling at Harris’ | ||||
| Find | |||||
| • | 3/3/2023 - Harris’ Find RC Assays Received | ||||
| • | 8/11/2023 - Proof of Concept Drilling Returns | ||||
| High-Grade Gold Results | |||||
| Further work | • | The nature and scale of planned further work (eg tests | Barwidgee Fault | ||
| for lateral extensions or depth extensions or large-scale step-out drilling). |
• | Further work at Harris Find may include RC | |||
| • | Diagrams clearly highlighting the areas of possible | Drilling and/or Diamond Drilling. | |||
| extensions, including the main geological | • | See diagrams within main body of | |||
| interpretations and future drilling areas, provided this | announcement. | ||||
| information is not commercially sensitive. | |||||
| Harris Find | |||||
| • | Further work at Harris Find may include RC | ||||
| Drilling and/or Diamond Drilling. | |||||
| • | See diagrams within main body of | ||||
| announcement. | |||||
| 48 |
| Criteria | JORC Code explanation | Commentary | Commentary |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ives | Find | ||
| • | Further work at Harris Find may include RC | ||
| Drilling and/or Diamond Drilling. | |||
| • | See diagrams within main body of | ||
| announcement. | |||
| May | Queen | ||
| • | Further work at May Queen may include RC | ||
| Drilling and/or Diamond Drilling. | |||
| • | See diagrams within main body of | ||
| announcement. |
| Criteria | JORC Code explanation | Commentary | Commentary |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ives | Find | ||
| • | Further work at Harris Find may include RC | ||
| Drilling and/or Diamond Drilling. | |||
| • | See diagrams within main body of | ||
| announcement. | |||
| May | Queen | ||
| • | Further work at May Queen may include RC | ||
| Drilling and/or Diamond Drilling. | |||
| • | See diagrams within main body of | ||
| announcement. |