Skip to main content

AI assistant

Sign in to chat with this filing

The assistant answers questions, extracts KPIs, and summarises risk factors directly from the filing text.

AES CORP Proxy Solicitation & Information Statement 2018

Mar 13, 2018

30641_rns_2018-03-13_a6b855f9-95d6-466e-8297-3788c26d41e8.zip

Proxy Solicitation & Information Statement

Open in viewer

Opens in your device viewer

PX14A6G 1 d313184px14a6g.htm Licensed to: Securex Filings LLC Document created using EDGARfilings PROfile 4.3.3.1 Copyright 1995 - 2018 Summit Financial Printing, LLC. All rights reserved.

Shareholder Memo

There are at least 2 reasons to vote against item 4:

  1. To ratify the Special Meeting Provisions in the Company’s By-Laws.

In other words to ratify the status quo for 25% of shares to have the right to call a special meeting.

AES management belatedly cooked up this ratification proposal after the shareholder proposal was submitted. Item 4 was designed to prevent shareholders from voting on a 2018 shareholder proposal asking that 10% of shares have the right to call a special meeting.

This is the AES Corporation no action request to eliminate the shareholder proposal from the 2018 proxy:

The AES Corporation (December 19, 2017)

https://www.sec.gov/divisions/corpfin/cf-noaction/14a-8/2017/johncheveddenaes121917-14a8.pdf

It is an advantage for shareholders to have an ownership threshold of 10%. AES previously adopted an ownership threshold of 25% – which can mean that more than 50% of shareholders must be contacted during a short window of time to simply call a special meeting. Plus many shareholders, in favor of a special meeting, can make a small technical error that will disqualify them from being counted to make up the 10% threshold.

Thus the first reason to vote against item 4 is to express preference to lower the ownership threshold to less than the unrealistically high 25%.

The second reason is to send a message to management that a one-sided management ratification proposal to simply ratify the status quo is no substitute for a shareholder proposal to give shareholders a choice on another option.

If the shareholder proposal had been published in the 2018 proxy AES management could oppose the shareholder proposal with 3 or more times the number of words in the shareholder proposal.

With the ratification proposal replacing the shareholder proposal shareholders can only read the one-sided proxy text that is 100% in support of the management status quo position.

It is an advantage for shareholders to have a choice.

Vote against item 4.

John Chevedden

AES shareholder since 2013