Skip to main content

AI assistant

Sign in to chat with this filing

The assistant answers questions, extracts KPIs, and summarises risk factors directly from the filing text.

AD Plastik d.d. Audit Report / Information 2025

Apr 27, 2026

2080_10-k_2026-04-27_fe5c3358-22f7-4649-bb07-ac225ca664fa.pdf

Audit Report / Information

Open in viewer

Opens in your device viewer

KPMG

Independent Auditor's Report

To the shareholders of AD Plastik d.d.

Report on the Audit of the Separate Financial Statements

Opinion

We have audited the separate financial statements of AD Plastik d.d. ("the Company"), which comprise:

  • the separate statement of financial position as at 31 December 2025;

and, for the year from 1 January 2025 to 31 December 2025:

  • the separate statement of profit or loss and other comprehensive income;
  • the separate statement of changes in equity;
  • the separate statement of cash flows;

and

  • notes, comprising material accounting policies and other explanatory information ("the separate financial statements").

In our opinion, the accompanying separate financial statements give a true and fair view of the unconsolidated financial position of the Company as at 31 December 2025, and of its unconsolidated financial performance and its unconsolidated cash flows for the year then ended in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards as adopted by the European Union ("EU IFRS").

Basis for Opinion

We conducted our audit in accordance with International Standards on Auditing ("ISAs") and Regulation (EU) No. 537/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council. Our responsibilities under those standards are further described in the Auditor's Responsibilities for the Audit of the Separate Financial Statements section of our report.

We are independent of the Company in accordance with the ethical requirements that are relevant to audits of the separate financial statements of public interest entities in the Republic of Croatia, and we have fulfilled our other ethical responsibilities in accordance with these requirements. We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our opinion.


KPMG

Key Audit Matters

Key audit matters are those matters that, in our professional judgment, were of most significance in our audit of the separate financial statements of the current period. These matters were addressed in the context of our audit of the separate financial statements as a whole, and in forming our opinion thereon, and we do not provide a separate opinion on these matters.

REVENUE RECOGNITION

Revenue in 2025: EUR 121,189 thousand (2024: EUR 111,152 thousand). As at 31 December 2025, trade receivables: EUR 23,498 thousand; accrued revenue: EUR 579 thousand (31 December 2024, trade receivables: EUR 21,916 thousand; accrued revenue: EUR 325 thousand).

Please refer to the Note 2.3 Revenue recognition of Significant accounting policies and Note 4 Sales in the separate financial statements.

The key audit matter

Revenue is an important metric used to evaluate the financial performance of the Company. In the year ended 31 December 2025, its principal revenue streams included sales of car parts and of customized tools developed by the Company. As discussed in Note 2.3, revenue is recognized when control over the goods is transferred to the customer.

Application of the revenue recognition principles of the relevant financial reporting standard, IFRS 15 Revenue from Contracts with Customers ("the Standard"), is complex and requires making significant assumptions and judgment. In the Company's case, particular complexity is associated with the following aspects:

  • Determination of whether a customer contract exists requires the Company to assess whether one document or a combination of documents, including general terms of business, nomination letter, agreement with customer and purchase orders, create enforceable rights and obligations of the parties to the arrangement.
  • Goods with different revenue recognition patterns, such as spare parts and tooling, may be sold as part of one contract or several contracts accounted for as one arrangement. The Company applies significant judgment in identifying contracts which require to be combined and accounted for as one arrangement, and in identifying performance obligations therein.

How the matter was addressed in our audit

Our audit procedures in this area included, among others:

  • Assessing the accounting policy for recognition of revenue and its compliance with the requirements of the Standard;
  • Updating our understanding of the Company's revenue recognition process, and testing the design and implementation of selected related internal controls within;
  • For a sample of sales transactions in the current year, inspecting underlying contractual provisions and making inquiries of relevant sales and finance personnel, in order to challenge:
  • The existence of a customer contract, by reference to the relevant criteria of the Standard, including, among other things, those relating to the parties' commitment to their obligations and probability of collecting the consideration due;
  • Identification of the contracts which require to be accounted for on a combined basis and of performance obligations within those contracts, by among other things, assessment of whether the goods and services in the arrangements are distinct and also whether any subsequent changes to the contract price arising from the learning curve result in the reduced price representing the parts' stand-alone selling price;

KPMG

• Many contracts with customers entitle customers to price reductions after a certain period of purchase orders (as a result of expected reduction in the Company's costs along its learning curve). Judgement is required to determine whether such ‘efficiency savings’ provide customers with material rights to be accounted for as separate performance obligations. • Tooling arrangements are typically contracts or framework agreements between the Company and its customers for the sale of tools to be used in the production of customized parts for a given customer. Since such tooling arrangements may vary with respect to transfer of development activities and ownership, careful assessment to determine whether, among other things, an arrangement is a sale, a lease or development of its own equipment, whether it contains a lease and whether it is a separate performance obligation from the sale of car parts. In the wake of the above factors, we considered revenue recognition to be associated with a significant risk of material misstatement in the separate financial statements. Therefore, the area required our increased attention in the audit and as such was determined to be a key audit matter. • Inspecting underlying contracts with customers for tooling sales transactions to identify any lease component embedded within those contracts, mainly by evaluating ownership rights, the party directing the use of the tool and whether there is a separate performance obligation in relation to the sale of car parts. • For a sample of sales transactions selected as part of the preceding procedure, challenging the timing of the transfer of control, the resulting pattern of revenue recognition and revenue amounts, by reference to sales invoices, inventory and shipping documents, customer acceptance forms and other documents as appropriate; • For a sample of invoices, obtaining confirmations of the amounts receivable outstanding as at the reporting date, and evaluating any differences between the amounts confirmed and the Company's records, by inspecting the underlying documentation such as contracts, invoices, shipping documents, customer acceptance forms and payments made by customers; • Inspecting journal entries posted to revenue accounts focusing on unusual and irregular items; • Examining whether the Company's revenue recognition-related disclosures in the separate financial statements appropriately address the relevant quantitative and qualitative requirements of the applicable financial reporting framework.

Other Information

Management is responsible for the other information. The other information comprises the Management Report (together with Sustainability Statement) and the Corporate Governance Report included in the Annual Report of the Company but does not include the separate financial statements and our auditor's report thereon.

Our opinion on the separate financial statements does not cover the other information.

We have performed a limited assurance engagement on the Consolidated Sustainability Statement that forms part of the other information and provided a separate unmodified assurance practitioner's conclusion thereon that is included within the other information.

In connection with our audit of the separate financial statements, our responsibility is to read the other information and, in doing so, consider whether the other information is materially inconsistent with the separate financial statements or our knowledge obtained in the audit, or otherwise appears to be materially misstated.


KPMG

With regard to the Management Report and the Corporate Governance Report, we also performed procedures prescribed by applicable legal requirements and we report that:

  • the information given in the Management Report and the Corporate Governance Report for the financial year for which the separate financial statements are prepared, is consistent, in all material respects, with the separate financial statements;
  • the Management Report and the Corporate Governance Report have been prepared, in all material respects, in accordance with applicable legal requirements.

If, based on the work we have performed, we conclude that there is a material misstatement of this other information, we are required to report that fact. We have nothing to report in this regard.

Responsibilities of Management and Those Charged with Governance for the Separate Financial Statements

Management is responsible for the preparation of the separate financial statements that give a true and fair view in accordance with EU IFRS, and for such internal control as management determines is necessary to enable the preparation of separate financial statements that are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error.

In preparing the separate financial statements, management is responsible for assessing the Company's ability to continue as a going concern, disclosing, as applicable, matters related to going concern and using the going concern basis of accounting unless management either intends to liquidate the Company or to cease operations, or has no realistic alternative but to do so.

Those charged with governance are responsible for overseeing the Company's financial reporting process.

Auditor's Responsibilities for the Audit of the Separate Financial Statements

Our objectives are to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the separate financial statements as a whole are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error, and to issue an auditor's report that includes our opinion. Reasonable assurance is a high level of assurance, but is not a guarantee that an audit conducted in accordance with International Standards on Auditing will always detect a material misstatement when it exists. Misstatements can arise from fraud or error and are considered material if, individually or in the aggregate, they could reasonably be expected to influence the economic decisions of users taken on the basis of these separate financial statements.

As part of an audit in accordance with International Standards on Auditing, we exercise professional judgment and maintain professional skepticism throughout the audit. We also:

  • Identify and assess the risks of material misstatement of the separate financial statements, whether due to fraud or error, design and perform audit procedures responsive to those risks, and obtain audit evidence that is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our opinion. The risk of not detecting a material misstatement resulting from fraud is higher than for one resulting from error, as fraud may involve collusion, forgery, intentional omissions, misrepresentations or the override of internal control.
  • Obtain an understanding of internal control relevant to the audit in order to design audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company's internal control.
  • Evaluate the appropriateness of accounting policies used and the reasonableness of accounting estimates and related disclosures made by management.
  • Conclude on the appropriateness of management's use of the going concern basis of accounting and, based on the audit evidence obtained, whether a material uncertainty exists related to events or conditions that may cast significant doubt on the Company's ability to continue as a going concern. If we conclude that a material uncertainty exists, we are required to draw attention in our auditor's report to the related disclosures in the separate financial statements or, if such

KPMG

disclosures are inadequate, to modify our opinion. Our conclusions are based on the audit evidence obtained up to the date of our auditor's report. However, future events or conditions may cause the Company to cease to continue as a going concern.

  • Evaluate the overall presentation, structure and content of the separate financial statements, including the disclosures, and whether the separate financial statements represent the underlying transactions and events in a manner that achieves fair presentation.

We communicate with those charged with governance regarding, among other matters, the planned scope and timing of the audit and significant audit findings, including any significant deficiencies in internal control that we identify during our audit.

We also provide those charged with governance with a statement that we have complied with relevant ethical requirements regarding independence, and communicate with them all relationships and other matters that may reasonably be thought to bear on our independence and where applicable, actions taken to eliminate threats or safeguards applied.

From the matters communicated with those charged with governance, we determine those matters that were of most significance in the audit of the separate financial statements of the current period and are therefore the key audit matters. We describe these matters in our auditor's report unless law or regulation precludes public disclosure about the matter or when, in extremely rare circumstances, we determine that a matter should not be communicated in our report because the adverse consequences of doing so would reasonably be expected to outweigh the public interest benefits of such communication.

Report on Other Legal and Regulatory Requirements

Information Required by Regulation (EU) No. 537/2014 of the European Parliament and the Council

Appointment of Auditor and Period of Engagement

We have been appointed to audit the annual separate financial statements of the Company by resolution of those charged with governance dated 17 July 2025. Our period of total uninterrupted engagement is 6 years, covering the periods ended 31 December 2020 to 31 December 2025.

Consistency with Additional Report to Audit Committee

We confirm that our audit opinion is consistent with the additional report to the Audit Committee.

Non-audit Services

We declare that no prohibited non-audit services referred to in Article 5 (1) of Regulation (EU) No. 537/2014 of the European Parliament of the Council and Article 44 of the Audit Act were provided and that we remained independent in conducting the audit.


KPMG

Report on Compliance with the ESEF Regulation

In accordance with the requirements of Article 462 paragraph 5 of Capital Market Act, we are required to express an opinion on whether the separate financial statements of the Company as at and for the year ended 31 December 2025, as included in the attached electronic file adplastik-drustvo-2025-12-31-1-en.zip, have been prepared, in all material respects, in accordance with the requirements of the Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2019/815 of 17 December 2018 supplementing Directive 2004/109/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council with regard to regulatory technical standards on the specification of a single electronic reporting format ("the RTS on ESEF").

Responsibilities of Management and Those Charged with Governance

Management is responsible for the preparation of the separate financial statements in a digital format that complies with the RTS on ESEF. This responsibility includes:

  • the preparation of the separate financial statements in the applicable XHTML format and their publication;
  • the selection and application of appropriate iXBRL tags, using judgment where necessary;
  • creating and properly anchoring extension elements where no suitable element exists;
  • performing block-tagging where required;
  • ensuring consistency between digitised information and the separate financial statements presented in human-readable format; and
  • the design, implementation and maintenance of internal control relevant to the application of the RTS on ESEF.

Those charged with governance are responsible for overseeing the Company's ESEF reporting, as a part of the financial reporting process.

Auditor's Responsibilities

Our responsibility is to express an opinion on whether the separate financial statements have been prepared, in all material respects, in accordance with the RTS on ESEF, based on the evidence we have obtained. We conducted our reasonable assurance engagement in accordance with International Standard on Assurance Engagements 3000 (Revised), Assurance Engagements Other than Audits or Reviews of Historical Financial Information (ISAE 3000) issued by the International Auditing and Assurance Standards Board.

A reasonable assurance engagement in accordance with ISAE 3000 involves performing procedures to obtain evidence about whether the separate financial statements have been prepared, in all material respects, in accordance with the RTS on ESEF. The nature, timing and extent of procedures selected depend on the auditor's judgment, including the assessment of the risks of material departures from the requirements of set out in the RTS on ESEF, whether due to fraud or error. Reasonable assurance is a high degree of assurance. However, it does not guarantee that the scope of procedures will identify all significant (material) non-compliance with the RTS on ESEF.


KPMG

Our procedure included, among others:

  • obtaining an understanding of the Company's ESEF preparation process;
  • evaluating the design and implementation of relevant controls over the iXBRL tagging process;
  • assessing the XHTML structure and the completeness of tagging;
  • evaluating the appropriate application of core taxonomy elements, the creation and anchoring of extension elements, and the application of block-tagging where required; and, where relevant,
  • assessing consistency between machine-readable and human-readable versions and the signed audited separate financial statements.

We believe that the evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our opinion.

Opinion

In our opinion, based on the procedures performed and evidence obtained, the separate financial statements of the Company as at and for the year ended 31 December 2025 presented in ESEF format and contained in the aforementioned attached electronic file, have been prepared, in all material respects, in accordance with the requirements of the RTS on ESEF.

KPMG Croatia d.o.o. za reviziju
24 April 2026

Croatian Certified Auditors
Eurotower, 17th floor
Ivana Lučića 2a
10000 Zagreb
Croatia

Domagoj Hrkać
Member of the Management Board, Croatian Certified Auditor