AI assistant
ABX GROUP LIMITED — Capital/Financing Update 2022
Mar 15, 2022
64283_rns_2022-03-15_421c359f-d2da-4367-ab3e-79f281a2253e.pdf
Capital/Financing Update
Open in viewerOpens in your device viewer
ASX Announcement
16 March 2022
==> picture [169 x 74] intentionally omitted <==
ASX: ABX
Fourth discovery confirms Rare Earths province ABx tenement coverage increased
Discovery of high grade REE at Rubble Mound 6 km southeast of Deep Leads
New rare earth element (REE) prospect discovered at Rubble Mound located 6 km east of ABx’s Deep Leads REE project in northern Tasmania
Rubble Mound results include hole RM161 grading 1,620 ppm total rare earth oxides (TREO)
Rubble Mound discovery and the new tenement EL10/2021 confirm that ABx now controls an REE province that is at least 52 kms wide. Several other targets are still to be tested
ABx Group Limited (ABX) is pleased to announce the discovery of a new rare earth element (REE) prospect at Rubble Mound in northern Tasmania (see Figure 1).
==> picture [436 x 277] intentionally omitted <==
----- Start of picture text -----
Wind Break
REE
Deep 52km
Leads REE Targets
Portrush
REE Rubble Mound
REE discovery Launceston REE
----- End of picture text -----
Figure 1: ABx leases in the 52km wide REE province. Deep Leads REE trends towards Rubble Mound (yellow dashes)
Rubble Mound REE discovery lies 6km southeast of Deep Leads. The line of lode from Deep Leads trends through the newly granted EL10/2021 to Rubble Mound in hardwood plantations. ABx’s REE discoveries at Portrush and Wind Break are 52km and 16km from Deep Leads respectively.[ 1]
ABx CEO, Mark Cooksey commented; “Our new EL10/2021 secures the gap between Deep Leads and Rubble Mound which significantly increases the potential size of REE resources. Deep Leads REE mineralisation could connect to Rubble Mound.
"Our exploration manager, Paul Glover and national operations manager, Nathan Towns are also assembling a bulk sample for metallurgical testwork to learn more about our potential to produce a saleable REE concentrate using simple leaching processes”; he said.
1 see ASX releases 10th & 14th February 2022 Level 5 52 Phillip Street Sydney NSW 2000 P: +61 2 9251 7177 F: +61 2 9251 7500
ABx Group Limited ABN 14 139 494 885
==> picture [596 x 74] intentionally omitted <==
----- Start of picture text -----
ASX release 16 March 2022
page 2
----- End of picture text -----
ABx REE discoveries across northern Tasmania
ABx is an emerging hi-technology and explorer-developer company that is the first company to discover clay-hosted REE in northern Tasmania, initially at Deep Leads. ABx’s latest discovery at Rubble Mound confirms that ABx has at least four REE discoveries, as shown in Figure 1:
-
Deep Leads project (see ASX releases 10[th] & 14[th] February 2022)
-
Rubble Mound located 6 km southeast of Deep Leads (new discovery reported here)
-
Wind Break project 16 km northeast of Deep Leads (ASX releases 10[th] & 14[th] February 2022)
-
Portrush project located 52 km east of Deep Leads (ASX releases 10[th] & 14[th] February 2022)
New REE discovery at Rubble Mound
These initial drilling results from Rubble Mound have identified similar REE mineralisation to that of the main REE discovery at Deep Leads and suggest that there is a 6 km long line of lode targets between Deep Leads and the new Rubble Mound discovery.
The newly granted exploration licence EL10/2021 secured this potential connection between Deep Leads and Rubble Mound, which is a series of ridges in hardwood plantation land. Like the Deep Leads REE, the Rubble Mound REE mineralisation is mainly in clays at the gradational boundary between a thick clay horizon and the weathered bedrock.
==> picture [468 x 254] intentionally omitted <==
----- Start of picture text -----
RM158
RM161
RM125
RM051
----- End of picture text -----
Figure 2 : Initial assay results from the Rubble Mound REE discovery shown as total rare earth oxide (TREO). The geology of the line of lode is prospective for REE mineralisation over a distance of 6km to Deep Leads
Table 1 : REE results of the 4 holes that reached the mineralised horizon at Rubble Mound[ 2]
| Hole From To m m |
Nd2O3 ppm |
Pr2O3 ppm |
Dy2O3 ppm |
Tb2O3 ppm |
Sm2O3 ppm |
Other REE ppm |
TREO ppm |
| RM051 6 7 |
314 | 94 | 37 | 7 | 66 | 622 | 1,141 |
| RM125 12 13 |
255 | 65 | 56 | 8 | 50 | 899 | 1,334 |
| RM158 13 14 |
267 | 63 | 83 | 12 | 65 | 973 | 1,463 |
| RM161 6 7 |
17 | 4 | 4 | 1 | 4 | 1,591 | 1,620 |
2 See JORC Appendix 1 and Table 2: results & locations.
Note: the sample from the bottom of hole RM161 is rich in cerium (Ce) which usually occurs above the main REE zone in this REE province
==> picture [596 x 74] intentionally omitted <==
----- Start of picture text -----
ASX release 16 March 2022
page 3
----- End of picture text -----
Deep Leads project and south-eastern trending line of lode
Deep Leads REE mineralisation extends over a 3.5km strike length and has a southeast trending line of lode heading towards Rubble Mound as shown in Figure 1 and 3.
The line of lode between Deep Leads and Rubble Mound has similar geology to Deep Leads and the newly granted tenement EL10/2021 allows ABx to explore the line of lode which occurs in recently harvested hardwood plantations.
==> picture [526 x 511] intentionally omitted <==
Figure 3 : Deep Leads drillholes with REE grades shown as total rare earth oxide (TREO). The geology of the line of lode is prospective for REE mineralisation over a distance of at least 6km from Deep Leads to Rubble Mound. This prospective ground is now secured by the recently granted tenement EL10/2021 (see Figure 1).
==> picture [596 x 74] intentionally omitted <==
----- Start of picture text -----
ASX release 16 March 2022
page 4
----- End of picture text -----
Rare Earth Element market continues to exceed expectations
Prices of the super-magnet rare earth elements are rising strongly due to a significant shortage of supply and aggressive buying by the major consumers and governments. China currently controls 86% of global REE supply but is not expanding production at the same rate that demand for the critical REEs has risen.
==> picture [502 x 273] intentionally omitted <==
Figure 4 : Market prices are rising strongly for the super-magnet suite of rare earth elements (REE) neodymium (Nd), praseodymium (Pr), dysprosium (Dy) and terbium (Tb)
The super-magnet suite of REE comprise neodymium (Nd), praseodymium (Pr), dysprosium (Dy), terbium (Tb) and samarium (Sm). They are in short supply and are needed for use in electric vehicles, wind turbines, mobile phones, computers and military applications. ABx’s REE mineralisation is enriched in this super-magnet suite of REE, especially Nd and Pr.
ABx is exploring where welcomed and in land that may be amenable to early development.
ABx is increasing its ability to identify REE prospects in this province which has been subjected to a range of intense geological events. ABx has discovered a province that contains several prospects with strongly enriched clay-hosted REE mineralisation.
This announcement is approved for release by the board of directors.
For further information please contact:
Dr Mark Cooksey CEO ABx Group Mobile : +61 447 201 536 Email: [email protected]
Website: abxgroup.com.au
==> picture [596 x 74] intentionally omitted <==
----- Start of picture text -----
ASX release 16 March 2022
page 5
----- End of picture text -----
Qualifying statements
General : The information in this report that relate to Exploration Information and Mineral Resources are based on information compiled by Jacob Rebek and Ian Levy who are members of The Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy and the Australian Institute of Geoscientists. Mr Rebek and Mr Levy are qualified geologists and Mr Levy is a director of ABx Group Limited.
Tasmania : The information relating to Exploration Information and Mineral Resources in Tasmania has been prepared or updated under the JORC Code 2012. Mr Rebek and Mr Levy have sufficient experience, which is relevant to the style of mineralisation and type of deposit under consideration and to the activity, which they are undertaking to qualify as a Competent Person as defined in the 2012 Edition of the Australasian Code for Reporting of Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves. Mr Rebek and Mr Levy have consented in writing to the inclusion in this report of the Exploration Information in the form and context in which it appears.
Table 2: drilling results & location data
| Hole From To m m |
Nd2O3 ppm |
Pr2O3 ppm |
Dy2O3 ppm |
Tb2O3 ppm |
Sm2O3 ppm |
Other REE ppm |
TREO ppm |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RM009 11 12 |
5 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 31 | 41 |
| RM009 12 13 |
17 | 5 | 4 | 1 | 4 | 279 | 310 |
| RM015 13 14 |
13 | 3 | 4 | 1 | 4 | 102 | 127 |
| RM018 7 8 |
4 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 47 | 54 |
| RM019 4 5 |
5 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 37 | 48 |
| RM019 7 8 |
7 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 352 | 365 |
| RM022 8 9 |
6 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 30 | 40 |
| RM022 18 19 |
6 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 54 | 65 |
| RM022 19 20 |
16 | 4 | 6 | 1 | 4 | 92 | 123 |
| RM023 9 10 |
29 | 8 | 6 | 1 | 7 | 463 | 514 |
| RM024 6 7 |
15 | 4 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 697 | 723 |
| RM025 7 8 |
17 | 5 | 4 | 1 | 4 | 200 | 231 |
| RM025 9 10 |
122 | 30 | 23 | 4 | 29 | 589 | 798 |
| RM051 6 7 |
314 | 94 | 37 | 7 | 66 | 622 | 1,141 |
| RM052 3 4 |
9 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 27 | 42 |
| RM052 9 10 |
24 | 6 | 6 | 1 | 6 | 268 | 312 |
| RM053 3 4 |
5 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 50 | 59 |
| RM053 4 5 |
9 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 126 | 142 |
| RM058 8 9 |
8 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 191 | 205 |
| RM058 10 11 |
10 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 155 | 171 |
| RM059 9 10 |
9 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 148 | 164 |
| RM061 9 10 |
7 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 37 | 49 |
| RM061 10 11 |
8 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 136 | 151 |
| RM062 3 4 |
15 | 4 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 152 | 178 |
| RM064 5 6 |
5 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 25 | 34 |
| RM065 5 6 |
6 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 51 | 63 |
| RM065 6 7 |
10 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 67 | 85 |
| RM066 6 7 |
9 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 145 | 160 |
| RM066 8 9 |
11 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 233 | 252 |
| RM067 8 9 |
22 | 6 | 5 | 1 | 5 | 195 | 233 |
| RM067 10 11 |
42 | 11 | 10 | 2 | 10 | 232 | 306 |
| RM119 5 6 |
6 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 50 | 61 |
| RM120 5 6 |
11 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 134 | 152 |
| RM122 9 10 |
24 | 6 | 7 | 1 | 6 | 121 | 167 |
| RM125 7 8 |
21 | 6 | 6 | 1 | 6 | 115 | 155 |
| RM125 12 13 |
255 | 65 | 56 | 8 | 50 | 899 | 1,334 |
| RM129 7 8 |
20 | 5 | 4 | 1 | 5 | 406 | 441 |
| RM129 14 15 |
38 | 9 | 11 | 2 | 10 | 153 | 223 |
| RM130 13 14 |
13 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 4 | 141 | 164 |
| RM132 8 9 |
3 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 24 | 30 |
| RM132 10 11 |
6 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 190 | 199 |
| RM133 4 5 |
2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 14 | 18 |
| RM133 6 7 |
2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 29 | 34 |
| RM156 4 5 |
4 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 22 | 29 |
| RM156 6 7 |
9 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 39 | 54 |
| RM158 10 11 |
21 | 5 | 7 | 1 | 6 | 119 | 158 |
| RM158 13 14 |
267 | 63 | 83 | 12 | 65 | 973 | 1,463 |
| RM160 4 5 |
4 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 302 | 310 |
| RM161 6 7 |
17 | 4 | 4 | 1 | 4 | 1,591 | 1,620 |
| RM162 3 4 |
9 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 55 | 71 |
| RM163 5 6 |
15 | 4 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 89 | 114 |
| RM166 19 20 |
54 | 13 | 13 | 2 | 12 | 177 | 271 |
| RM166 21 22 |
33 | 8 | 10 | 2 | 8 | 146 | 207 |
==> picture [183 x 495] intentionally omitted <==
----- Start of picture text -----
Hole Northing Easting
Coordinates GDA94
RM009 5407681 482573
RM015 5407967 482619
RM018 5408117 482646
RM019 5408204 482650
RM022 5407701 482612
RM023 5407747 482633
RM024 5407797 482643
RM025 5407853 482654
RM051 5407589 482661
RM052 5407573 482730
RM053 5407628 482737
RM058 5407514 482770
RM059 5407465 482826
RM061 5407429 482754
RM062 5407446 482704
RM064 5407358 482813
RM065 5407366 482763
RM066 5407373 482716
RM067 5407364 482664
RM119 5408057 482581
RM120 5407590 482782
RM122 5407685 482801
RM125 5407594 482831
RM129 5407569 482952
RM130 5407525 482957
RM132 5407455 482880
RM133 5407412 482914
RM156 5407316 482791
RM158 5408311 480877
RM160 5408191 481208
RM161 5408222 481301
RM162 5408165 481053
RM163 5408265 481368
RM166 5405869 480830
----- End of picture text -----
APPENDIX 1
==> picture [169 x 74] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [247 x 67] intentionally omitted <==
----- Start of picture text -----
ASX release 16 March 2022
page 6
----- End of picture text -----
JORC Code, 2012 Edition – Table 1 report
Section 1 Sampling Techniques and Data (Criteria in this section apply to all succeeding sections.)
| Criteria | JORC Code explanation | Commentary |
|---|---|---|
| Sampling | • Nature and quality of sampling (eg cut channels, random chips, or specific specialised industry | • Drill holes samples to 25 metres maximum depth but |
| techniques | standard measurement tools appropriate to the minerals under investigation, such as down hole | typically to 12 metres depth |
| gamma sondes, or handheld XRF instruments, etc). These examples should not be taken as limiting | ||
| the broad meaning of sampling. | ||
| • Include reference to measures taken to ensure sample representivity and the appropriate calibration of any measurement tools or systems used. | ||
| • Aspects of the determination of mineralisation that are Material to the Public Report. | ||
| • In cases where ‘industry standard’ work has been done this would be relatively simple (eg ‘reverse circulation drilling was used to obtain 1 m samples from which 3 kg was | ||
| pulverised to produce a 30 g charge for fire assay’). In other cases more explanation may be required, such as where there is coarse gold that has inherent sampling problems. | ||
| Unusual commodities or mineralisation types(eg submarine nodules) may warrant disclosure of detailed information. | ||
| Drilling | • Drill type (eg core, reverse circulation, open-hole hammer, rotary air blast, auger, Bangka, sonic, | • Reverse circulation rotary percussion |
| techniques | etc) and details (eg core diameter, triple or standard tube, depth of diamond tails, face-sampling | |
| _bit or other type, whether core is oriented and if so, by what method, etc). _ | ||
| Drill sample | • Method of recording & assessing core and chip sample recoveries and results assessed. | • Weight tests indicated reliable sample recovery |
| recovery | • Measures taken to maximise sample recovery & ensure representative nature of the samples. | |
| • Whether a relationship exists between sample recovery and grade and whether sample bias may | ||
| have occurred due topreferential loss/gain of fine/coarse material. | ||
| Logging | • Whether core and chip samples have been geologically and geotechnically logged to a level of detail to support | • Geologically logged in detail by senior |
| appropriate Mineral Resource estimation, mining studies and metallurgical studies. | professional geologists. Every sample photographed, | |
| • Whether logging is qualitative or quantitative. Core (or costean, channel, etc) photography. | with photos and logs and assays entered into ABx’s | |
| • The total length andpercentage of the relevant intersections logged. | proprietaryABacus database. | |
| Sub-sampling | • If core, whether cut or sawn and whether quarter, half or all core taken. | • Chips are subsampled using bauxite shovel method in |
| techniques | • If non-core, whether riffled, tube sampled, rotary split, etc and whether sampled wet or dry. | accordance with ISO standards |
| and sample | • For all sample types, the nature, quality and appropriateness of the sample preparation technique. | |
| preparation | • Quality control procedures adopted for all sub-sampling stages to maximise representivity of samples. | |
| • Measures taken to ensure that the sampling is representative of the in situ material collected, including for | instance results for field duplicate/second-half sampling. | |
| • Whether sample sizes are appropriate to thegrain size of the material being sampled. | ||
| Quality of | • The nature, quality and appropriateness of the assaying and laboratory procedures used and | • All assaying done at NATA-registered commercial |
| assay data | whether the technique is considered partial or total. | laboratories of ALS Brisbane Australia and Labwest |
| and | • For geophysical tools, spectrometers, handheld XRF instruments, etc, the parameters used in | Minerals Analysis Pty Ltd in Western Australia. |
| laboratory tests |
determining the analysis including instrument make and model, reading times, calibrations factors applied and their derivation, etc. |
Duplicate interlab assays done. • Round robin assays with 4 other major laboratories |
| • Nature of quality control procedures adopted (eg standards, blanks, duplicates, external lab checks) & whether | confirmed accuracy and precision meets industry |
|
| acceptable levels of accuracy (ie lack of bias) &precision have been established. | standards. |
ASX release 16 March 2022 page 7 |
|
|---|---|
| Criteria JORC Code explanation Commentary |
|
| Verification of sampling and assaying • The verification of significant intersections by either independent or alternative company personnel. • The use of twinned holes. • Documentation of primary data, data entry procedures, data verification, data storage (physical and electronic) protocols. • Discuss any adjustment to assay data. • All assaying done at NATA-registered commercial laboratories of ALS Brisbane Australia and Labwest Minerals Analysis Pty Ltd in Western Australia. Duplicate interlab assays showed excellent correspondence. |
|
| Location of data points • Accuracy and quality of surveys used to locate drill holes (collar and down-hole surveys), trenches, mine workings and other locations used in Mineral Resource estimation. • Specification of the grid system used. • Quality and adequacy of topographic control. • GPS hole locations have been tested for accuracy on many prospects, all satisfactorily – within 1m. |
|
| Data spacing and distribution • Data spacing for reporting of Exploration Results. • Whether the data spacing and distribution is sufficient to establish the degree of geological and grade continuity appropriate for the Mineral Resource and Ore Reserve estimation procedure(s) and classifications applied. • Whether sample compositing has been applied. • Drilling typically at 50 to 75 metre spacing on mineralised prospects |
|
| Orientation of data in relation to geological structure • Whether the orientation of sampling achieves unbiased sampling of possible structures and the extent to which this is known, considering the deposit type. • If the relationship between the drilling orientation and the orientation of key mineralised structures is considered to have introduced a sampling bias, this should be assessed and reported if material. • Vertical holes through flat-dipping bauxite is as good as it gets |
|
| Sample security • The measures taken to ensure sample security. • Samples collected and assembled onto pallets every day |
|
| Audits or reviews • The results of any audits or reviews of sampling techniques and data. • Several audits confirmed reliability |
Section 2 Reporting of Exploration Results (Criteria listed in the preceding section also apply to this section.)
| Criteria | JORC Code explanation | Commentary |
|---|---|---|
| Mineral | • Type, reference name/number, location and ownership including agreements or material issues with | • Satisfactory to excellent. All tenements are |
| tenement and land tenure |
third parties such as joint ventures, partnerships, overriding royalties, native title interests, historical sites, wilderness or national park and environmental settings. • The security of the tenure held at the time of reporting along with any known impediments to |
unencumbered.… |
| status | obtaining a licence to operate in the area. | |
| Exploration done by other parties |
• Acknowledgment and appraisal of exploration by other parties. |
• 3 industry majors and two customers have approved exploration methods and data collection, interpretation and reporting |
| Geology | • Deposit type, geological setting and style of mineralisation. | • Bauxite deposit formed on Lower Tertiarybasalts |
ASX release 16 March 2022 page 8 |
|
|---|---|
| Criteria JORC Code explanation Commentary |
|
| Drill hole Information • A summary of all information material to the understanding of the exploration results including a tabulation of the following information for all Material drill holes: o easting and northing of the drill hole collaro elevation or RL (Reduced Level – elevation above sea level in metres) of the drill hole collaro dip and azimuth of the holeo down hole length and interception deptho hole length.• If the exclusion of this information is justified on the basis that the information is not Material and this exclusion does not detract from the understanding of the report, the Competent Person should clearly explain why this is the case. • GPS location. • Airborne Radar RL topography • All holes are short straight vertical holes |
|
| Data aggregation methods • In reporting Exploration Results, weighting averaging techniques, maximum and/or minimum grade truncations (eg cutting of high grades) and cut-off grades are usually Material and should be stated. • Where aggregate intercepts incorporate short lengths of high grade results and longer lengths of low grade results, the procedure used for such aggregation should be stated and some typical examples of such aggregations should be shown in detail. • The assumptions usedfor any reporting of metal equivalent values should be clearly stated. • All data are presented. |
|
| Relationship between mineralisation widths & intercept lengths • These relationships are particularly important in the reporting of Exploration Results. • If the geometry of the mineralisation with respect to the drill hole angle is known, its nature should be reported. • If it is not known and only the down hole lengths are reported, there should be a clear statement to this effect(eg ‘down hole length, true width not known’). • Mineralisation typically 3 to 6 metres thick and Drillholes are sampled at 1 metre intervals |
|
| Diagrams • Appropriate maps and sections (with scales) and tabulations of intercepts should be included for any significant discovery being reported These should include, but not be limited to a plan view of drill hole collar locations and appropriate sectional views. • N.A. |
|
| Balanced reporting • Where comprehensive reporting of all Exploration Results is not practicable, representative reporting of both low and high grades and/or widths should be practiced to avoid misleading reporting of Exploration Results. • All new results are reported in this report |
|
| Other substantive exploration data • Other exploration data, if meaningful and material, should be reported including (but not limited to): geological observations; geophysical survey results; geochemical survey results; bulk samples – size and method of treatment; metallurgical test results; bulk density, groundwater, geotechnical and rock characteristics; potential deleterious or contaminating substances. • N.A. APPENDIX 1 |
|
| Further work • The nature and scale of planned further work (eg tests for lateral extensions or depth extensions or large-scale step-out drilling). • Diagrams clearly highlighting the areas of possible extensions, including the main geological interpretations andfuture drilling areas, provided this information is not commercially sensitive. • Step-out drilling over a wider area has been planned, work plans submitted and new drill rig has been mobilised. |
END