Investor Presentation • Oct 16, 2025
Investor Presentation
Open in ViewerOpens in native device viewer







▪ In 2024 the HH/BB share was ~60% of total spot volume

Latest on USTR port fees shows a large increase in related fees with little to no implementation time. In relation to Chinese retaliation fees, increasing tarifftension and ongoing IMO NZF discussion, our industry has increasingly become a bargaining chip for overarching geopolitics between US, China and the EU.
HA has an ongoing dialogue with relevant stakeholders to provide timely and relevant information about the impact and discuss cost implications with customers with further market updates on our Q3 reporting (30. Oct 2025)

| Car carrier USTR fee development | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Timeline | Initial USTR draft (February 21st) |
USTR proposal (April 17th) |
USTR Annex III 1st revision (June 6th) |
USTR Annex III 2nd revision (October 10th) |
| Key cost drivers |
▪ Number of US port calls ▪ Operator, vessel and fleet Chinese affiliation or origin (cumulative impact) |
▪ Vessel CEU capacity ▪ Number of voyages with US port calls |
▪ Vessel Net tonnage ▪ Number of voyages with US port calls |
▪ Vessel Net tonnage ▪ Number of voyages with US port calls |
| Impacted vessels |
▪ Chinese built vessels ▪ Chinese operated vessels ▪ Vessel in fleet with Chinese vessels ▪ Vessel in fleet with Chinese orders |
All RoRo vessel except a) US built vessels (currently 1) b) Vessel with operators having similar size vessel built at US yard (currently none) |
All RoRo vessel except a) US built vessels (currently 1) b) Vessel with operators having similar size vessel built at US yard (currently none) c) MSP vessels (~20) d) US gov. vessels (0) e) US gov. cargo |
All RoRo vehicle carriers* except a) US built vessels (currently 1) b) Vessel with operators having similar size vessel built at US yard (currently none) c) U.Sowned or U.Sflagged vessels enrolled in the Maritime Security Program d) U.S. Government vessels e) U.Sflag vessels of up to 10,000 DWT |
| Implementation period |
Not stated | ~180 days with implementation October 14th |
Implementation October 14th (100 days lead-time) |
Implementation October 14th (4 days lead-time) |
| Illustrative financial impact per US port rotation |
\$1.0-3.5m per port call \$3m – 6m, dependent on number of ports and vessel Chinese affiliation |
\$150 per CEU capacity ~\$1m-1,4m, depending on vessel size |
\$14 per vessel net ton ~\$0,3m-0,5m, depending on vessel size |
\$46 per vessel net ton ~\$0,9m-1,5m, depending on vessel size (Charged up to five times per calendar year, per vessel) |
*ICST codes 325 (Vehicle Carrier), 332 (Ro-Ro Passenger), 333 (Other Ro-Ro Cargo), or 338 (Ro-Ro Container)


1) Units: Höegh Autoliners average fleet carbon intensity indicator (CII)



1) Per Q2 2025 (22. Aug. 2025)

Historically strong contract backlog providing earnings ✓ visibility

✓ No refinancing before 2030 and newbuilds fully financed

21 debt free vessels providing financial and operational ✓ flexibility

✓ Capacity cost reduced by ~40% compared to pre-covid levels

✓ Proven track record in returning value to shareholders



Have a question? We'll get back to you promptly.