Annual Report • Jul 31, 2025
Annual Report
Open in ViewerOpens in native device viewer

ANNUAL REPORT AND ACCOUNTS 2025


We are Great Place to Work-Certied™ Read more page 79

Chief Executive Ocer's Review pages 8 to 13

Corporate Governance pages 156 to 213

Financial Statements pages 214 to 274
The Watches of Switzerland Group provides clients with the nest selection of luxury timepieces from all the major groups and independent brands together with an impressive presentation of smaller independent brands. Our showrooms are in prominent, high-prole shopping areas within the UK and US.
Our Purpose is an inextricable part of how we do business. Environmental, social and governance factors are considered in our decision-making processes, at every level of our business.
Our Values shape our culture and behaviour, driving performance and purposeful action. They are the cornerstone of our Code of Ethics and truly represent who we are.


146 UK SHOWROOMS AT 27 APRIL 2025


3,000+ NUMBER OF COLLEAGUES AT 27 APRIL 2025
£1,652m CHANGE VS LY:
+7%
REVENUE RETURN ON CAPITAL EMPLOYED1

-50bps

£114m
CHANGE VS LY:
-5%


UK and Europe

PROFITABILITY
US

1 This is an Alternative Performance Measure. Refer to the Glossary on pages 270 to 273 for denition and reconciliation to statutory measures where relevant.
2 Please refer to the Glossary on pages 270 to 273 for a denition.
4
| 6 | Chair's Statement |
|---|---|
| 8 | Chief Executive Ofcer's Review |
| 14 | Market Review |
| 26 | Our Business Model |
| 28 | Our Brand Partnerships |
| 34 | Our Strategy |
| 38 | Our Strategy in Action |
| 54 | Key Performance Indicators |
| 59 | Financial Review |
| 65 | Non-Financial and Sustainability |
| Information Statement | |
| 66 | Section 172(1) Statement |
| 70 | Environmental, Social and Governance |
| 144 | Risk Management |
| 148 | Principal Risks and Uncertainties |
| 154 | Going Concern and Viability Statement |
| 8 | Chief Executive Ofcer's Review |
|---|---|
| 14 | Market Review |
| 26 | Our Business Model |
| 28 | Our Brand Partnerships |
| 34 | Our Strategy |
| 38 | Our Strategy in Action |
| 54 | Key Performance Indicators |
| 59 | Financial Review |
| 65 | Non-Financial and Sustainability |
| Information Statement | |
| 66 | Section 172(1) Statement |
| 70 | Environmental, Social and Governance |
| 144 | Risk Management |
| 148 | Principal Risks and Uncertainties |
5

We are condent in the strength of our business model, our strong pipeline of showroom openings and the resilience of the luxury watch and jewellery categories."
I am pleased to share this year's Chair's Statement, marking another successful chapter in our Group's journey. Despite an increasingly complex global environment – dened by political uncertainty, economic uctuations and rising operational costs – our business has not only demonstrated resilience but achieved meaningful strategic progress throughout FY25. Our UK business has performed well, returning to revenue growth, while the US business continued to outperform, boosted by the acquisitions of Roberto Coin Inc. and the Hodinkee business. The year 2025 also sees the start of our celebrations for the 250-year anniversary of the Mappin & Webb brand, a testament to our long-standing heritage and expertise within the luxury watch and jewellery market.
We continue to pursue our growth strategy through investment in our showrooms, selective acquisitions and retailing excellence whilst driving underlying protability. Our brand relationships are stronger than ever and our focus on providing the best client experience remains unchanged.
The recent opening of the new agship Rolex boutique on Old Bond Street, London, has been a real highlight. The boutique showcases our business at its very best, through showroom design, client experience and retailing excellence. We also believe it demonstrates the strong relationship we have with our key brand partners and the collaboration between us.
The acquisition of Roberto Coin Inc. has accelerated our growth in the luxury branded jewellery market. Roberto Coin is a globally renowned brand, with a particularly strong position in North America, and has high-quality, exquisite designs. We are excited about the potential of this brand within North America and we are working on a number of strategic growth initiatives. We will further be developing our luxury branded jewellery strategy through the opening of the Mappin & Webb Luxury Jewellery boutique, Manchester in FY26.
We are encouraged by the strong performance of the Rolex Certied Pre-Owned programme – now present in 46 showrooms across the UK and US – in addition to the sustained growth in our overall pre-owned business.
Additionally, FY25 saw the exciting acquisition of the Hodinkee business, a leading global digital platform for luxury watch enthusiasts, further strengthening our online sector leadership.
We continued to build a more sustainable business and are proud to become Great Place to Work-Certied™ which reects our deep investment in culture, talent and the wellbeing of every colleague.
Business growth and our commitment to improving the quality of our Greenhouse Gas (GHG) emissions data, contributed to an 11% increase in our total location-based emissions. However, we remain determined to reach net-zero by 2050 and are pleased to report a 86% reduction in our market-based operational emissions. We look forward to further reductions in FY26, following investment into a new energy management and decarbonisation system and the introduction of on-site energy generation at a key site.
Our support of a more circular economy continued with a 39% increase in sales of pre-owned watches, although with fewer clients seeking after-sales and servicing, we missed our overall circularity target in FY25, making the promotion of our repairs business a key focus for us in FY26.
We continue to work with supplier partners to help highlight more sustainable attributes of our products, and have strengthened our procurement function and introduced a new supply chain management system to ensure our watches and jewellery are responsibly and ethically sourced.
We continue to recognise the importance of good governance alongside diversity and inclusion both in the boardroom, with Senior Management and throughout the organisation. I am pleased to report that the Group remains compliant with the recommendations of the Parker Review and the FTSE Women Leaders Review, where we were ranked #7 of the FTSE 250, our highest score to date.
The business has been resilient and agile, and our strategy remains the right one for the long-term success of the business. As we look ahead, we are condent in the strength of our business model, our strong pipeline of showroom openings and the resilience of the luxury watch and jewellery categories.
On behalf of the Board, I extend my sincere gratitude to Brian Duffy, our executive team and colleagues throughout the organisation for their hard work and dedication, as well as to personally thank my fellow Board members for their active role in supporting the work of the team.
Finally, I would like to take this opportunity to thank our clients, brand partners, shareholders and other stakeholders for their continued support, trust and belief in our vision.
IAN CARTER CHAIR 2 July 2025

I am proud of the strong performance our team has delivered, underpinned by a signicant trading improvement in H2 FY25 with Group revenue +12% vs prior year. The US business has continued its strong momentum, surpassing \$1 billion revenue for the rst time, and the UK returned to growth. Our performance reects our scale and leadership in our chosen markets, supported by longstanding, collaborative partnerships with world-leading brands across luxury watches and luxury branded jewellery."
FY25 was a year of strong strategic and operational progress for the Group, which saw the US business continuing its strong momentum, and the UK returning to growth. Group revenue came in at £1,652 million, which is an increase of +8% on the prior year, with +16% in the US (including Roberto Coin Inc.) and +2% in the UK (all in constant currency). From a protability perspective, we saw full year Adjusted EBIT1 improvement to £150 million, which was +12% (constant currency) year-on-year.
In the US, we experienced good growth, delivering +19% revenue growth in H2 FY25 (constant currency) following a rst half that was impacted by the Q1 increase of showroom stock levels of key brands to enhance displays and client experience. The US now makes up 48% of Group revenue in FY25.
In the UK, we were pleased to see the external environment stabilise in line with our expectations, supporting revenue growth of +6% in H2 FY25. The UK performance continues to be driven by a domestic clientele with minimal return of tourist spending due to lack of VAT free shopping.
The luxury watch category is strong, resilient and offers long-term consistent growth. In recent years, the impact of the global pandemic has resulted in a period of unprecedented volatility. We believe the market has now normalised and secondary market prices have stabilised at above pandemic levels.
A highlight this year, was the opening of the agship Rolex boutique on Old Bond Street, London. Operating across four oors in circa 7,200 square feet, this boutique includes the rst dedicated Rolex Certied Pre-Owned oor, as well as three oors dedicated to sales and hospitality, and an after-sales lounge home to six watchmakers and technicians. The performance of the Rolex boutique has exceeded expectations.
On 8 May 2024, we announced that the Group had acquired the exclusive distribution rights for the Roberto Coin brand in the US, Canada, Central America and the Caribbean, through the acquisition of Roberto Coin's US associated company, Roberto Coin Inc.. The brand is well-recognised within the growing US luxury jewellery market. Integration is progressing to plan, and we see enormous potential growing this iconic brand with existing customers and using our retail expertise to elevate and expand store presence. We have received positive feedback from the network of retail partners and distribution remains intact from the acquisition. FY25 saw good revenue growth from the Roberto Coin brand within the Group's US showrooms, particularly following the installation of elevated displays. Looking ahead to FY26, we are working on a shop-in-shop concept with retail partners and are actively negotiating new mono-brand boutiques in the US, with three leases signed to date. The Roberto Coin US website upgrade is in progress. May 2025 saw the launch of a new marketing campaign with Dakota Johnson as the global brand ambassador.
We are encouraged by the performance of the Rolex Certied Pre-Owned programme, which launched last year and continues to trade strongly, and the sustained growth in our overall pre-owned business. Rolex Certied Pre-Owned is available in all 21 of our US Rolex showrooms and 25 of our UK showrooms. Window displays are now in place and productivity is expected to increase as a result.
The luxury branded jewellery market continues to grow, particularly in the US, and remains a key part of our long-term strategy for growth. FY25 saw exclusive luxury branded jewellery launches in the UK and there will be further brands to follow in FY26 with the opening of the Mappin & Webb Luxury Jewellery boutique, Manchester, which will include a De Beers boutique – the rst one outside of London.
On 3 October 2024, we acquired the editorial, insurance and limited-edition business from Hodinkee, the pre-eminent global digital editorial content provider and gateway for luxury watch enthusiasts, further strengthening our online sector leadership. Integration is progressing in line with our expectations, and it has been a pleasure working closely with Ben Clymer and his team. The upgrade for the new Watches of Switzerland US ecommerce website launched in May 2025, with Mayors, Betteridge and Roberto Coin sites to follow shortly.
Signicant progress has been made on key showroom projects:
In April 2025, the Group announced the closure of a number of low protability showrooms in the UK. The Group continually assesses its operations to remain as efcient and productive as possible.
The exit from Europe is now complete, which allows us to focus on higher returning markets. Three showrooms closed in the year and four sold to brand partners. The nal two boutiques were sold to brand partners in June 2025.
We have continued to progress against our strategic pillars of People, Planet and Product throughout FY25. Highlights during the year include:
Our recently acquired Roberto Coin business in North America has traded well since acquisition. We see great potential for this well-recognised brand in the fast-growing US branded jewellery market and are excited to have launched a marketing campaign featuring Dakota Johnson as a global brand ambassador."
BRIAN DUFFY CEO



As we look ahead, whilst we are of course remaining mindful of the broader macroeconomic and consumer environment, including potential US tariff changes, we remain condent in the strength of our business model, our strong pipeline of showroom openings and the resilience of the luxury watch category where demand for key brands continues to outstrip supply."
BRIAN DUFFY CEO
As we enter FY26, we are mindful of the uncertain macroeconomic backdrop, geopolitical developments, potential US tariff changes, and their potential impact on consumer condence. We remain condent in the strong fundamentals of the luxury watch category and our differentiated business model in the underdeveloped US market.
The US luxury jewellery market is the largest in the world and growing strongly. We will continue to build on the momentum we have seen in Roberto Coin Inc., with several exciting growth initiatives, including a major marketing campaign, secured locations for three mono-brand boutiques and our ecommerce website upgrade.
We are focused on the delivery of our strategy and are encouraged by our strong pipeline of high-quality projects opening in FY26, across both the UK and US, including:
Our Guidance for the 53 weeks of FY26 (pre-IFRS 16) is based on:
| Constant currency revenue growth | 6% - 10% | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Adjusted EBIT margin % | Flat to -100 bps vs prior year | |||
| Capital expenditure | £65 - £70 million | |||
The Group is exposed to movements in the £/\$ exchange rate when translating the results of its US operations into Sterling. The actual exchange rate for FY25 was \$1.28.
The outcome of US tariff developments remains uncertain. We are in regular dialogue with our brand partners, but it is too early to comment on the potential sector impact of further changes. We will provide a further update as to the potential impact on FY26 guidance once the situation becomes clearer.
Finally, the progress we have made over the year could not have been achieved without the continued hard work and dedication of our 3,000+ colleagues at the Watches of Switzerland Group. I would like to personally thank them for their contribution.
BRIAN DUFFY CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER 2 July 2025
14
Led by the most prestigious global brands focused on investment, product quality and innovation and brand marketing, achieving a higher average selling price than most luxury consumer goods categories
The overall market demand for Swiss watches exceeds production levels and supply for key brands. Clients required to 'register interest' for key products
All major brands generally require prior showroom approval as a pre-requisite for online selling; multi-channel is a preferred direction
Strong brand partnerships are based on many years of experience and category expertise
Brands actively manage distribution through Selective Distribution Agreements
High-quality mechanical luxury watches are often passed down for generations or resold. Most can be repaired indenitely and many of the materials they contain are recyclable
Limited threat from technology or geography
Rarity, heritage, craftsmanship and precious materials support brand image and value; some products considered investment asset class
Specialist for both the manufacturer and the retailer; consumers respond to expertise, authority and heritage

1 Market with attractive, long-term structural growth dynamics. Resilient demand exceeding supply for key brands.
2 Track record of strong revenue growth, ahead of underlying markets and further opportunities for growth.
3 Long-term margin progression.
4 Good cash conversion supporting ongoing balance sheet strength.
5 Disciplined capital allocation across organic and inorganic growth, with surplus capital returned to shareholders.
6 Long-term, compounding shareholder returns.
15
MARKET REVIEW CONTINUED
The luxury watch industry is well protected with high barriers to entry and a track record of consistent long-term growth, underpinned by sustained investment and elevated innovation.
The Group estimates global retail sales of luxury1 watches were approximately £48.0 billion in calendar year 2024. This is based on the estimated retail value of Swiss luxury watches (Swiss exports and the Swiss market), repairs and services, and the contribution from non-Swiss luxury watch brands.
Luxury watches have continued to be supported by long-term increases in prices, with the average selling price (ASP) of Swiss watch exports (wholesale) generating a 24-year CAGR of +5.2% (2024 vs 2000).
Watches at the luxury end of the market have outperformed lower priced segments and represent 95% of the value of global Swiss watch exports in calendar year 2024.
The US has seen signicant increases in Swiss watch exports in recent years, while the UK has remained in line with the global average, as can be seen in the graph (opposite). The EU market has beneted from the post-pandemic increase in tourist shopping. The UK market's removal of VAT-free shopping for tourists means that international sales have been minimal since Brexit.
The Global market experienced a period of signicant demand during the pandemic, which has since normalised in 2023/24.


RESILIENT LONG-TERM GROWTH IN SWISS WATCH EXPORTS (CALENDAR YEARS)
Luxury Non-luxury
Source: Company information, Swiss Watch Federation statistics
For the total luxury watch industry, demand has increased at a faster rate than production, in part reecting the labour-intensive nature of watchmaking and its dependence on highly skilled watchmakers in Switzerland. Long-term growth has been underpinned by increased Average Selling Prices (ASP), positive mix effects and limited volume increases.
Luxury watch brand owners are made up of major independents, large groups and smaller independents, as can be seen below. Our Group provides the largest selection of luxury watches covering a wide range of prices and consumer preferences, including the largest and best known brands alongside smaller independent brands.
We stock condently, which provides our clients with a greater range and availability. We have regular dialogue with our brand partners on current trends, often leading to the development of exclusive partnerships and/or rst to market timepieces. The table below shows the breakdown of the Group's brand partners.


Source: Morgan Stanley, Eighth Annual Swiss Watcher (13 February 2025)
Distribution of luxury watches takes place under Selective Distribution Agreements, strict legally binding contracts entered into with brands on a point of sale basis. These are ordinarily limited by geography and ensure retailers maintain strict presentation standards. Selective Distribution Agreements enable brands to manage the number of points of sale and qualitative criteria on retailer approval. Product presentation and client experience are closely monitored by the brand owners.
Globally, the retail market for luxury watches is fragmented, predominantly comprised of a large volume of small retailers. However, consolidation to fewer, better points of sale has been an ongoing trend, particularly in the US market. This provides an opportunity for our Group.
Luxury watches attract a set of shoppers, who can become repeat clients, spanning age, income groups and genders. Over the years, there has been an increasingly positive impact from digital and social media appealing to a younger market. The Group invests in digital marketing to attract clients and stimulate interest in the category.
Our showroom design, location, marketing and unique client service of the Group appeal to a broad demographic audience.
In FY25 the Group acquired the Hodinkee business, the pre-eminent global digital editorial content provider and gateway for luxury watch enthusiasts. Hodinkee has 48.0 million views per year and 1.5 million social media followers.

The Group operates in the UK and US markets, two of the major Swiss watch markets. The below chart shows the luxury watch retail sales per capita over the past four years.
On a per capita basis, the UK market has outperformed the US market and all major European markets since 2000. The UK market has the highest per capita retail spend by domestic clients on luxury watches; we believe the differential to other markets reects retail investment, not consumer behaviour, creating an opportunity to successfully replicate our model in other geographies and building on the success we have delivered in the US to date. The US market is underdeveloped providing signicant growth opportunities for the Group.

Source: Company estimates


The UK is the fth largest market globally for Swiss luxury watch exports. The Group estimates retail sales of luxury watches amounted to £3.4 billion in calendar year 2024.
The UK market has been strong, a testament to a well-invested, disciplined multi-channel market and highly engaged and sophisticated domestic clientele which has typically had a preference for the sports luxury watch category.
In the period 2000 to 2024, luxury Swiss watch exports to the UK increased by a CAGR of 7.4%, to CHF 1.6bn in 2024.
The UK market is made up of national groups, independent jewellers, luxury department stores and boutiques directly operated by the brands. It is led by Rolex, with strong market positions of Patek Philippe, OMEGA, Cartier, Breitling, TAG Heuer and TUDOR.

Source: GFK 1 Directly operated by the brands.
46%
5 RANKING IN GLOBAL MARKETS FOR SWISS WATCH EXPORTS CALENDAR YEAR 2024

Source: Swiss Watch Federation

US MARKET HIGHLIGHTS
1 RANKING IN GLOBAL MARKETS FOR SWISS WATCH EXPORTS CALENDAR YEAR 2024
ESTIMATED LUXURY WATCH RETAIL SALES CALENDAR YEAR 2024
After a period of underinvestment in the US leading up to 2018, the market has performed strongly and is today the largest global market for Swiss watch exports, overtaking China in 2021. The Group estimates retail sales of luxury watches reached \$8.8 billion in calendar year 2024.
The US market is led by Rolex with strong market positions of Cartier, Patek Philippe, Audemars Piguet, OMEGA, TUDOR, Breitling, Ofcine Panerai and TAG Heuer. Additionally, there are also relatively strong market positions for smaller independent brands such as MB&F, Bovet and H. Moser & Cie.
US retail distribution is in the process of consolidation towards larger showroom formats in major shopping centres, and retail investment from the Watches of Switzerland Group and others has increased. The US market is predominantly domestic, although domestic tourism (e.g. to Florida or Las Vegas) is signicant. In recent years Rolex, Patek Philippe and other brands have been rationalising distribution, reducing the number of agencies to a smaller number of higher quality retailers.
In the period 2000 to 2024, luxury Swiss watch exports to the US increased by a CAGR of 4.6%, with a CAGR of 12.7% in the period of 2017 to 2024 coinciding with the Watches of Switzerland Group entering the US market.

LUXURY SWISS WATCH EXPORTS TO THE US (CALENDAR YEARS)

Source: Swiss Watch Federation

We believe the pre-owned market is a positive development for the retail market. It provides liquidity and value preservation for luxury watches. This is a growing sector due to the supply of certain products being unable to meet demand in the rst hand market and for collectors given nearly 95%1 of watches are no longer in production.
Research analysts believe that the pre-owned watch market will be as big as the primary one within the next ten years2. The pre-owned product often sells at prices above retail due to unavailability and scarcity.
The market is made up of pre-owned (purchase or trade-in watches to sell on) and online marketplace players.
1 Source: BCG Luxury Preowned Watches, Your Time Has Come (March 2023).
2 Source: Deloitte Swiss Watch Industry Insights 2024 (December 2024).
In 2023, Rolex launched the Rolex Certied Pre-Owned programme offering the opportunity to purchase from ofcial authorised retailers, pre-owned watches that are certied as authentic and come with a Rolex backed two-year warranty. This has opened the pre-owned market up to clients who may have previously been nervous about purchasing pre-owned items. We see Rolex Certied Pre-Owned as a signicant opportunity for the Group and at the nancial year-end we showcased Rolex Certied Pre-Owned in 25 showrooms in the UK, including a dedicated oor at the recently opened agship Rolex boutique on Old Bond Street, London, and in all 21 of our Rolex agencies in the US, alongside our online offering.


Source: Deloitte Swiss Watch Industry Insights 2024 (December 2024).
The market is primarily supported by traditional multiple and independent retailers and brand in-house resources. After-sales and servicing represents 7%1 of the global luxury watch market and is very important in terms of providing a luxury client experience. The after-sales and servicing market has not kept pace with the growth of new watch sales.
The Group continues to invest in expanding its after-sales and servicing offering in both the UK and US, highlighted in FY25 by the new insurance offering launched in the US, and with the dedicated service centre oor at the recently opened agship Rolex boutique on Old Bond Street, London.
After-sales and servicing contributes to the circular economy; refer to page 111 to learn more.
1 Source: Veried Market Reports, Watch Service Market Insights (April 2025)

Our luxury watch business is complemented by a strong luxury jewellery offering.
The US and UK markets are growing strongly and are among the largest globally on a per capita basis for luxury jewellery as can be seen by the charts (below) (Source: World Gold Council).

Source: Metals Focus, Renitiv GFMS, ICE Benchmark Administration, World Gold Council
JEWELLERY DEMAND: CUMULATIVE YOY% (CALENDAR YEARS)

Source: Metals Focus, Renitiv GFMS, ICE Benchmark Administration, World Gold Council
The global luxury market has seen global trends towards the branded component of the market, as can be seen in the chart (opposite).
We see this as a signicant area of growth for the Group going forward, where we can apply our expertise gained in luxury watches to luxury jewellery. The Group partners with a number of luxury jewellery brands including Roberto Coin, Messika, BVLGARI and recently introduced David Yurman to the UK market. The Group's strategy is to increase the number of luxury jewellery brands offered within our portfolio, in many cases exclusively within a geographical area. In FY26 we will open the Mappin & Webb Luxury Jewellery boutique, Manchester, which will include a De Beers boutique.
On 8 May 2024, we announced that the Group had acquired the exclusive distribution rights for the Roberto Coin brand in the US, Canada, Central America and the Caribbean, through the acquisition of Roberto Coin's US associated company, Roberto Coin Inc.. For more details on our Roberto Coin Inc. acquisition please refer to pages 46 to 49.



Source: McKinsey, Euromonitor (2023)

Our strong and long-standing relationships with the most recognised and prestigious luxury watch and jewellery brands have been forged over many years and include new relationships with developing brands.
Please see pages 28 to 33 for more details on the prestigious brands we partner with.
The Watches of Switzerland Group is committed to building a great place to work by giving people every reason to join, grow and stay with our Group. We recognise the many benets a diverse and inclusive workforce can bring.
We offer an extensive choice of brands and products in the world of luxury watches and jewellery. We aim to make our clients feel welcome through unintimidating, inviting, browsable, modern and luxurious environments in our showrooms, along with a market-leading online offering.
Our clients purchase our products through our retail network of directly operated showrooms. These include multi-brand showrooms, a presence in travel retail, online and a portfolio of mono-brand boutiques in partnership with our brands.
Watches of Switzerland Group PLC is listed on the London Stock Exchange. Through focused investment we drive growth, generate shareholder value and ensure the long-term sustainable future of the Group.

We partner with the most prestigious luxury watch and jewellery brands to provide the highest level of client service by well-trained, expert colleagues in modern, luxurious and welcoming showroom environments and state-of-the-art online sites. This is all supported by our international scale, integrated technology and impactful marketing.
The Group operates in the UK and US.
We collaborate with our long-standing brand partners to elevate and expand their distribution and partner on demand forecasting, product launches, showroom projects, online, clienteling, marketing events and learning and development for all our colleagues.
Our showroom colleagues provide expertise and knowledge to ensure an exceptional client experience through extensive learning and development.
We have developed our industryleading Xenia Client Experience Programme.
Our well-invested showrooms are luxurious, open, welcoming, contemporary, spacious, nonintimidating and browsable. The design concept is regularly assessed in order to ensure we continue to appeal to a broad client demographic and drive high levels of productivity across our estate.
Our multi-channel model spans a well-invested showroom network, with agships, regional showrooms, travel retail and mono-brand boutiques complemented by market-leading ecommerce platforms. The Group has a truly multi-channel approach, which includes Click & Collect, an appointment system and the Luxury Watch and Jewellery Virtual Boutique.
We deliver impactful marketing focused on digital communications, Client Relationship Management, PR, client experiences and co-operative activity with brand partners. Our editorial content across watches and jewellery provides an authoritative voice within our market, while the acquisition of the Hodinkee business accelerates the Group's online leadership. Please see page 35 for more details.
High barriers to entry created through national coverage in the UK, with a portfolio of 146 showrooms, and a growing and signicant presence in the US, comprising 60 showrooms as at 27 April 2025.
Technology: Our retail integrated IT systems are based on a single SAP platform powering showroom point of sale, CRM, reporting solutions, live inventory availability and operations. This single platform enables rapid expansion capabilities in new markets or through acquisitions.
Merchandising: Dynamic inventory management optimises stock availability, enhances showroom productivity and in the UK, allows for nationwide coverage, giving us a key competitive advantage.
Retail operations: We aim to continually drive productivity and protability, with a high level of accountability and performance management.
Financial performance: We run all our showrooms to be protable, leveraging showroom and central overheads through top line growth with strict investment criteria on projects or investment opportunities. The closure of low protability showrooms in the UK is demonstration of this nancial discipline in action.
consistent generation of cash is fuelled by strict working capital management, with sufcient liquidity to fund growth and to provide for potential acquisition opportunities. We take a disciplined and data-led approach to return on investment, aiming to deliver long-term sustainable earnings growth whilst retaining nancial capability to invest in our business and to execute our strategic priorities, before returning to shareholders any surplus capital above and beyond those requirements, as appropriate. In FY25 the Group commenced a £25 million share buyback programme.
We develop our colleagues through signicant investment in training and development. This is supported by promoting an open and inclusive environment through listening to our colleagues. We are proud to have been Great Place to Work-Certied™ during the year in both the UK and US.
The Watches of Switzerland Group Foundation launched in 2021 and supports a number of causes, with an emphasis on helping poor and vulnerable people out of poverty. For more details refer to pages 92 to 99.
We are committed to always 'doing the right thing' to protect our planet and ensure our products are responsibly and sustainably sourced.
During the year, we transitioned to 100% renewable energy across our Group, backed by guarantees of origin, and successfully trialled a new energy management system to improve efciency and reduce costs in our most energy intensive sites.
We also strengthened our procurement function, introduced a new supply chain management system and ran our rst UK marketing campaign dedicated to promoting pre-owned watches in support of a more circular economy.
£1,652m FY25 REVENUE
£150m FY25 ADJUSTED EBIT1
19.0% FY25 RETURN ON CAPITAL EMPLOYED1
£214m FY25 CASH GENERATED FROM OPERATIONS
148 UK AND EUROPE SHOWROOMS
AT 27 APRIL 2025
60 US SHOWROOMS AT 27 APRIL 2025
208 TOTAL SHOWROOMS AT 27 APRIL 2025
3,000+
NUMBER OF COLLEAGUES
£8.3m
COMMITTED BY THE GROUP TO THE WATCHES OF SWITZERLAND GROUP FOUNDATION SINCE LAUNCH
1 This is an Alternative Performance Measure. Refer to the Glossary on pages 270 to 273 for denition and reconciliation to statutory measures where relevant.

Our long-standing association with the most recognised and prestigious luxury watch and jewellery brands is a key point of distinction and a cornerstone of our unique client experience.

We have developed strong, long-standing and collaborative partnerships with the most prestigious luxury watch brands over the years. We constantly strive to represent our brand partners in the best possible way to our clients. We work together to identify distribution opportunities, partner on demand forecasting and product development, and collaborate closely on all showroom projects, across our online platform, clienteling initiatives and marketing activities. We also collaborate with our brand partners on training our colleagues to ensure we have experts across all brands within our business.

Founded in 1905 in London by Hans Wilsdorf, Rolex watches are crafted from the nest raw materials and assembled with scrupulous attention to detail.

Utilising over 180 years of experience and perpetuating the tradition of Genevan watchmaking, Patek Philippe has always been at the forefront of the luxury watch industry.



Audemars Piguet is the oldest ne watchmaking manufacturer still in the hands of its founding families (Audemars and Piguet).


Space, James Bond and the Olympics – when it comes to co-associations, OMEGA certainly beats most watch brands in terms of cool, but above that is their absolute mastery of technology and ability to produce some of the nest movements available today.

Widely regarded as the inventor of the rst watch designed to be worn on the wrist, Cartier was established in Paris in 1847 and is arguably one of the most recognisable Maisons in the world.


Léon Breitling started his eponymous brand in 1884 and it has specialised in complicated timepieces and chronographs from the beginning, going on to pioneer the wrist-worn chronograph, which was hugely popular with pilots.

TAG Heuer creates watches that will take you anywhere – into the ocean's depths, up a mountain, behind the wheel of a car. TAG Heuer timepieces are reliable, innovative and versatile.


Since its founding in 1926, TUDOR has endeavoured to produce the best possible watches at the best possible price. This mission, bold then as it is now, is inspired by the vision of the brand's founder Hans Wilsdorf.

At the Watches of Switzerland Group, our brands Mappin & Webb, Goldsmiths, Mayors and Betteridge offer their very own collections of jewellery all steeped in a rich history and heritage, making our showrooms and websites the destination for ne luxury jewellery. We are also privileged to partner with the best luxury jewellery brands in the world, including Roberto Coin, David Yurman, BVLGARI, FOPE, Messika, Jenny Packham and Gucci.


Within the framework of our seven strategic priorities, we made progress during FY25 through elevated levels of investment and focus on further developing our client-centric business model.
To drive revenue growth across our markets of the UK and the US and deliver further operational leverage. Generate strong free cash ow conversion to support growth leading to enhanced Return on Capital Employed (ROCE). Delivered through consistent, sustained capital investment and selective acquisitions to support growth.
Read more on pages 148 to 153 Read more on pages 148 to 153 Read more on pages 148 to 153 Read more on pages 148 to 153
Our Xenia Client Experience Programme is an opportunity to create a unique differentiator to our competition. Everything we do is driven by our client experience and our colleagues, who are either serving a client or serving someone who is. Our three Xenia pillars of Know Me, WOW Me and Remember Me enable all colleagues to focus on how we make our clients
– We made our clients feel comfortable and at ease before their consultation commenced on 96% of visits with the conversation in 9 out of 10 occasions going beyond product and purchase to understand the client on a more
– Our colleagues' passion, expertise and condence shone through in 9 out of 10 occasions, with 90% of the shoppers agreeing they would be likely to purchase luxury watches or jewellery from the showroom in the future – Our online client experience remains strong with an average Trust Pilot rating
– In the UK, we hosted 225 events and entertained over 5,000 clients in both showrooms and key prestigious locations around the UK with our key brand partners across watches and jewellery along with Certied Pre-Owned events – In the US, we hosted over 360 events and entertained nearly 6,000 clients across showrooms and external venues with our key brand partners including
– Worked with The AHA Group to create an unrivalled client experience
– Continue to focus on the Xenia client experience across our showrooms
– Focus on clienteling the 'Collector' with relevant activations and enhanced
– Enriched retail training programmes to elevate the coaching and delivery of consistent exceptional service levels, supported by enhanced training
in Rolex Old Bond Street boutique (refer to page 41)
and embed throughout all our processes and support teams – Continue to elevate and widen our client event programme, with focus
feel throughout every interaction with our Group.
HOW WE PERFORMED IN FY25
of 4.5 across our US and UK websites
WHAT IT MEANS
personal level
launch events
OBJECTIVES FOR FY26
personalised VIP offerings
LINK TO KPIS 8 9
on strong commercial client events
resources and targeted training programmes
LINK TO PRINCIPAL RISKS AND UNCERTAINTIES
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 11
Creative, effective and relevant marketing content targeted towards a broad aspirational audience, to support our showrooms and showcase our breadth of range and expertise. We adopt a multi-channel marketing approach to maximise awareness, invest in performance marketing to drive sales both online and ofine, and work with brand partners on co-operative marketing
– Continued focus on performance marketing with market-leading digital campaigns across Google, optimised for multi-channel return – Our presence on social media continues to be an important channel to
– Investment in print media and outdoor advertising with our key brand partners, along with bursts of activity to support our Watches of Switzerland
rst series of dedicated Rolex Certied Pre-Owned events
– Investment in local activations, ensuring each new or refurbished showroom has a localised support plan to help drive awareness and footfall – Extensive PR activity in the US with activations such as the GPHG and the
– Delivered a comprehensive marketing plan to support the launch of Rolex Old Bond Street boutique with media, social media and events
– Maximise key brand partnerships with the delivery of full 360 marketing campaigns and event plans – focusing on new and exclusive products – Continue to drive awareness through a multi-channel strategy with bold,
– Ongoing investment in performance marketing to drive sales both online and ofine, continuing a strong digital presence to drive awareness and conversion – Deliver a strong event programme, with focus on commercial events, brand
– Focus on Certied Pre-Owned and the circular economy of selling and buying
– Focus on retail/commercial marketing to drive footfall and opportunities
– Strengthen our editorial voice, maximising the potential of Hodinkee – Grow the Roberto Coin brand by creating awareness through a high-prole campaign, with Dakota Johnson as Global Brand Ambassador, maximised
WHAT IT MEANS
campaigns, clienteling and events.
HOW WE PERFORMED IN FY25
Group exclusives and new agencies
OBJECTIVES FOR FY26
impactful content creation
in pre-owned watches
within showrooms
LINK TO KPIS
1 3 4 6 8 9
9
hospitality and selected brand experiences
across all marketing channels to drive conversion
LINK TO PRINCIPAL RISKS AND UNCERTAINTIES
inspire, engage and target a new, younger audience
Our strong and long-standing relationships with the most recognised and prestigious luxury watch and jewellery brands have remained a point of distinction. Many of these relationships have been forged over many years, but also include new relationships with some exciting brands. We have also developed exclusive partnerships and representations with some of our brand partners.
We work with a long-term view on elevating our brand partners' equity in the markets we serve and operate in full collaboration and transparency across all aspects of the product, marketing and distribution mix.
| 1 | Revenue | 7 | Cash generated from operations |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2 | Operating prot/EBIT | 8 | Average selling price |
| 3 | Adjusted EBIT | 9 | Number of showrooms |
| 4 | Basic EPS | 10 | Colleague Engagement Survey |
| 5 | Adjusted EPS | 11 | ESG – Carbon emissions |
| 6 | Return on Capital Employed | 12 | ESG – Circularity |
Our Xenia Client Experience Programme is an opportunity to create a unique differentiator to our competition. Everything we do is driven by our client experience and our colleagues, who are either serving a client or serving someone who is. Our three Xenia pillars of Know Me, WOW Me and Remember Me enable all colleagues to focus on how we make our clients
| 1 | Business strategy execution and development | 7 | Regulatory and compliance |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2 | Key suppliers and supply chain | 8 | Economic and political |
| 3 | Client experience and market risks | 9 | Brand and reputational damage |
| 4 | Colleague talent and capability | 10 | Financial and treasury |
| 5 | Data protection and cyber security | 11 | Climate change |
| 6 | Business interruption |

Creative, effective and relevant marketing content targeted towards a broad aspirational audience, to support our showrooms and showcase our breadth of range and expertise. We adopt a multi-channel marketing approach to maximise awareness, invest in performance marketing to drive sales both online and ofine, and work with brand partners on co-operative marketing campaigns, clienteling and events.
feel throughout every interaction with our Group.
WHAT IT MEANS
To drive revenue growth across our markets of the UK and the US and deliver further operational leverage. Generate strong free cash ow conversion to support growth leading to enhanced Return on Capital Employed (ROCE). Delivered through consistent, sustained capital investment and selective
– Group revenue +8% at constant currency and +7% at reported rates, Adjusted EBIT of £150 million (+12% at constant currency) and ROCE
– Acquired Roberto Coin Inc. and the Hodinkee business (refer to pages 42
– Relocated/expanded/refurbished 11 showrooms including the new agship Rolex boutique on Old Bond Street, London and introduction of Rolex agencies to Watches of Switzerland, Plano, Texas and Mayors, Jacksonville, Florida – Closed low protability showrooms in the UK, and progressed European exit – Continued the roll-out of Rolex Certied Pre-Owned and Certied
– Expansion of the luxury branded jewellery offering, including the exclusive
– New Audemars Piguet AP House, Manchester operating as a joint venture
– Expansion of luxury branded jewellery within our portfolio of showrooms and
– Launch of our Goldsmiths Signature diamond collection, exclusive cut in the
– Invest in Roberto Coin visibility and brand image, mono-brand boutique
– Invest in our showroom portfolio with an exciting pipeline including: – New Mappin & Webb Luxury Jewellery boutique, Manchester
– Continue to grow pre-owned and Rolex Certied Pre-Owned
UK market and fully traceable via TracR by De Beers
format, space expansion, merchandising and marketing – Launch the re-platformed US ecommerce sites
LINK TO PRINCIPAL RISKS AND UNCERTAINTIES
WHAT IT MEANS
of 19.0% (-50bps)
to 49)
online
LINK TO KPIS
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 12
1 2 3 4 6 8 9 10
acquisitions to support growth.
HOW WE PERFORMED IN FY25
– Opened four new showrooms
Pre-Owned within our portfolio – Commenced ecommerce re-platform in US
OBJECTIVES FOR FY26
launches of David Yurman and Repossi in the UK – Launched £25 million share buyback programme 2. ENHANCE STRONG BR AND PARTNERSHIPS
Our strong and long-standing relationships with the most recognised and prestigious luxury watch and jewellery brands have remained a point of distinction. Many of these relationships have been forged over many years, but also include new relationships with some exciting brands. We have also developed exclusive partnerships and representations with some of our brand partners.
aspects of the product, marketing and distribution mix.
HOW WE PERFORMED IN FY25
and Couture show in Las Vegas
We work with a long-term view on elevating our brand partners' equity in the markets we serve and operate in full collaboration and transparency across all
– Watches of Switzerland hosted the 2024 Grand Prix d'Horlogerie de Genève (GPHG) award-winning watches at our Watches of Switzerland showroom in
– Formulation of long-term development plans with our strategic brand partners – Opened the agship Rolex boutique on Old Bond Street, London (refer to
– Exclusive and rst-to-market watch product with a number of brands
– Continued acceleration of luxury branded jewellery with new brand partner introductions, including the UK exclusive launches for David Yurman
– Worked with brands on signicant training programmes for our colleagues including our Learning Management System to support e-learning
– Continue to grow our brand partners' equity, through network elevation
– Introduction of new jewellery brands to our portfolio, including De Beers in our new Mappin & Webb Luxury Jewellery boutique, Manchester – Continue celebrating our Mappin & Webb 250-year anniversary (refer to
– Develop strategic joint business plans focused on distribution, product
– Open the Audemars Piguet AP House, Manchester operating as a
– Strengthen partnerships with our brands on our ESG agenda
LINK TO PRINCIPAL RISKS AND UNCERTAINTIES
including Cartier, Breitling, TAG Heuer and BVLGARI
– Attended multiple watch and jewellery events, including Watches and Wonders Geneva, Geneva Watch Days, Vicenza Jewellery Show, and the JCK
WHAT IT MEANS
Soho, New York
pages 38 to 41
and Repossi
joint venture
pages 50 to 53
LINK TO KPIS 5 8 9 12
1 3 5 6 7 8 9
OBJECTIVES FOR FY26
and excellence in merchandising and retail
launches, training, marketing and online
LINK TO PRINCIPAL RISKS AND UNCERTAINTIES
Read more on pages 148 to 153 Read more on pages 148 to 153 Read more on pages 148 to 153 Read more on pages 148 to 153
9

Dynamic inventory management optimises stock availability, enhances showroom productivity and maximises stock turn. Focus on speed to market in both showrooms and online.
We aim to continually drive productivity and protability, with a high level of accountability and performance management.
Our integrated retail IT systems are based on a single SAP platform powering showroom point of sale, Client Relationship Management, reporting solutions, live inventory availability and operations. This single platform enables rapid expansion capabilities in new markets or through acquisitions.

We continue to make strong progress against Environmental, Social and Governance indicators, which serve as the foundation of our sustainability strategy and play a critical role in driving long-term value creation and enhancing
WHAT IT MEANS
People
Planet
Product
and due diligence
OBJECTIVES FOR FY26
LINK TO KPIS 10 11 12
1 2 6 9 10 11
and improve energy efciency – Evolve our climate transition planning
stakeholder trust and satisfaction.
HOW WE PERFORMED IN FY25
consumption and emissions
– Great Place to Work-Certied™ in both the UK and US – Further closure of the UK Gender Pay Gap by 4% to 16% – Ranked #7 of the FTSE 250 in the FTSE Women Leaders Review – Donated £986,646 to UK charities and \$591,500 to US charities through
86% reduction in our market-based operational emissions – Introduced a new energy management system to help reduce energy
– See page 58 for carbon emissions and circularity KPIs
Jeweller Awards for the second consecutive year
– Maintain our Great Place To Work® certication
LINK TO PRINCIPAL RISKS AND UNCERTAINTIES
– Strengthened our procurement function
– Transitioned to 100% renewable energy across our Group through the purchase of renewable energy certicates, backed by guarantees of origin – +11% in total location-based emissions, driven by growth in the business.
– Carried out a net-zero feasibility study and began to align our reporting with the recommendations of the UK Transition Plan Taskforce (TPT) – Grew sales of pre-owned watches by 39%, but missed our circularity target
– Implemented a bespoke AI platform to support data collection, transparency
– Ran our rst UK marketing campaign dedicated to promoting pre-owned watches – Mappin & Webb named CSR Jewellery Retailer of the Year by the Professional
– Set long-term, science-based targets to reach net-zero emissions by 2050
– Grow our range of products with positive environmental and social attributes – Further support circularity by promoting repairs, servicing and pre-owned – Continue our support for The Watches of Switzerland Group Foundation
The Watches of Switzerland Group Foundation
Our multi-channel business model is a key competitive advantage and underscores our ability to react with speed and agility to a rapidly evolving consumer environment whilst offering our clients an exceptional experience. We continue to invest in expanding and enhancing our platform, consisting of multi-brand showrooms, online, travel retail and mono-brand boutiques.
– Travel retail in the UK continues to improve as trafc continues to increase
– Acquisition and integration of Roberto Coin Inc. (refer to pages 46 to 49)
– Acquisition of the Hodinkee business (refer to pages 42 to 45)
9
Read more on pages 148 to 153 Read more on pages 148 to 153 Read more on pages 148 to 153

Dynamic inventory management optimises stock availability, enhances showroom productivity and maximises stock turn. Focus on speed to market
We aim to continually drive productivity and protability, with a high level
Our integrated retail IT systems are based on a single SAP platform powering showroom point of sale, Client Relationship Management, reporting solutions, live inventory availability and operations. This single platform enables rapid
– Improved inventory composition and turn to optimise open-to-buy, cost
– Extended the level of SKUs we have for key brands on our ecommerce platform to ensure we have the full range of products available by brand
– Opened the agship Rolex boutique on Old Bond Street, London with unparalleled client service protocols (refer to pages 38 to 41)
– Rened all retail procurement policies and processes, streamlining workload
– Commenced the UK retail transformation programme, driving efciency
– Continued to refresh and expand our in-store technology, ensuring showroom teams have the best technology to hand in support of every
– Optimise brand presentation in our showrooms with stock availability and depth and width of assortment, calibrating according to business needs and
– Focus on inventory composition to further improve ranging and inventory turns – Continue refurbishment and performance improvement of our showroom
– Focus on data analytics and AI to drive business insight and performance
– Range reviews by showroom and brand, alongside inventory and turn targets
WHAT IT MEANS Merchandising
Retail operations
IT systems
Merchandising
Retail operations
IT systems
client transaction
OBJECTIVES FOR FY26
space capacity
network
LINK TO KPIS
in both showrooms and online.
HOW WE PERFORMED IN FY25
set by brand and product groups
for retail colleagues and reducing costs
and protability through our showroom network – Opened our new US Support Centre in Sunrise, Florida
– Began re-platforming of our US ecommerce platforms – Enhanced the Group's cyber security protection framework
– Launch the re-platformed US ecommerce sites – Continue to enhance our cyber security infrastructure
LINK TO PRINCIPAL RISKS AND UNCERTAINTIES
2 3 4 56 7 8 9 12
1 2 3 4 6 7 8 10 11
of accountability and performance management.
to assort and bestseller and novelties coverage
expansion capabilities in new markets or through acquisitions.
Our multi-channel business model is a key competitive advantage and underscores our ability to react with speed and agility to a rapidly evolving consumer environment whilst offering our clients an exceptional experience. We continue to invest in expanding and enhancing our platform, consisting of multi-brand showrooms, online, travel retail and mono-brand boutiques.
– Completed the signicant refurbishments/expansions/relocations of ten multi-brand showrooms, including the opening of a new 2,000 sq. ft. Patek Philippe room in Betteridge, Greenwich, Connecticut
– Continued to leverage our market-leading position in the UK in digital
– Acquisition of the Hodinkee business to leverage online client base and trafc
– Opened the agship Rolex boutique on Old Bond Street, London (refer to
– Travel retail in the UK continues to improve as trafc continues to increase
– Acquisition and integration of Roberto Coin Inc. (refer to pages 46 to 49)
– Acquisition of the Hodinkee business (refer to pages 42 to 45)
– Ongoing investment in elevating and upgrading the existing network – Growing sector leadership online with a focus on luxury watches, jewellery and luxury branded jewellery with continual improvement of user experience – Launching the new US ecommerce platform, providing a more seamless
– Working closely with our brand partners to further develop our multi-channel
– Commencing strategic initiatives for Roberto Coin Inc., including space
expansion and opening mono-brand boutiques in the US
LINK TO PRINCIPAL RISKS AND UNCERTAINTIES
– Converted our Mayors, Lenox, Atlanta showroom to a Rolex boutique
WHAT IT MEANS
Online
HOW WE PERFORMED IN FY25 Multi-brand showrooms
– Opened two new multi-brand showrooms
marketing and multi-channel excellence – Commenced the US ecommerce re-platform
Mono-brand boutiques
Wholesale branded jewellery
OBJECTIVES FOR FY26
journey for Hodinkee trafc
partnerships
LINK TO KPIS
1 3 4 6 8 10
9
pages 38 to 41)
Travel retail
Media
We continue to make strong progress against Environmental, Social and Governance indicators, which serve as the foundation of our sustainability strategy and play a critical role in driving long-term value creation and enhancing stakeholder trust and satisfaction.
10 11 12
LINK TO PRINCIPAL RISKS AND UNCERTAINTIES 1 2 6 9 10 11
Read more on pages 148 to 153 Read more on pages 148 to 153 Read more on pages 148 to 153
Our strategy is underpinned by three pillars

Give our colleagues every reason to join, grow and stay Attract and retain talent Build an organisation t for the future Leverage our unique culture Support our local communities
Read more on page 78

PLANET
Achieve net-zero carbon by 2050 Build climate resilience Help preserve natural resources
Read more on page 100

Improve our traceability and sourcing standards Highlight industry progress Support circularity through repairs, servicing and our pre-owned business
Read more on page 132

We are delighted to support our longest-standing partner in the UK, the Watches of Switzerland Group, with the opening of the new boutique in Bond Street. The new store represents the latest elevation in customer service standards and Rolex representation.
The boutique is not only a place to purchase a timepiece but also a celebration of the brand's legacy, with The Rolex Watch Company having been founded in London in the early 1900s. It reects innovation and a commitment to delivering an unparalleled experience for every client."
RICHARD DE LEYSER MANAGING DIRECTOR, ROLEX UK

On 14 March 2025, we were proud to open our new agship Rolex boutique located on Old Bond Street in Mayfair, London. The opening represents an exciting new chapter in the partnership with Rolex, which began over 100 years ago in 1919 with our Northern Goldsmiths showroom in Newcastle. We were honoured to reveal this landmark showroom, having managed the former Rolex boutique on Old Bond Street for the last 50 years, marking a signicant milestone in the luxury horology retail landscape.
Nestled in one of the most prestigious global luxury retail destinations, the new boutique spans four elegantly designed oors, each dedicated to welcoming clients and showcasing the nest Rolex timepieces. Visitors are able to immerse themselves in the entire Rolex collection, with all iconic families such as GMT Master II, Cosmograph Daytona and Submariner showcased. Additionally, the boutique features a oor dedicated to Rolex Certied Pre-Owned and a Rolex exhibition which proudly displays the nest heritage pieces from the last 120 years. The boutique also includes a Rolex Authorised Service Centre for the maintenance and care of clients' timepieces.
The boutique's interior is a harmonious blend of contemporary elegance and timeless craftsmanship, featuring distinct areas that cater to every aspect of a client's journey. Upon entering the ground oor, visitors are met with an elegant marble mosaic-oored reception lobby adorned with a signature green marble wall and large concierge desk, where they are greeted by attentive hosts who guide them seamlessly through the boutique.
Directly adjacent to the reception, the main showroom area offers a thoughtfully arranged display space, allowing clients to explore and familiarise themselves with the Rolex collections. A captivating, suspended art installation featuring gold bezels and green glass, visible from each oor, adds a touch of creativity, taking advantage of the full height of the building. With carefully curated displays and an expert, passionate team on hand, visitors will receive a personalised service and guidance as they discover the history and innovation behind each timepiece.
As clients descend to the lower ground oor via the bespoke walnut staircase which runs throughout, they will enter a room divided into two complementary spaces: the Rolex exhibition area and the Rolex Certied Pre-Owned room. This elegant sanctuary resembles a private study, complete with relaxed seating areas and gallery walls showcasing iconic Rolex testimonies. Here, clients can immerse themselves in the rich history and technical excellence of the brand, making the experience not just a retail visit, but an insightful journey into the world of Rolex.
The rst oor is home to current Rolex collections, where the pinnacle of watchmaking is displayed. Designed with luxury in mind, two private consultation suites grant clients the opportunity to try on rare and exclusive timepieces. Further presentation areas are furnished with tan leather seating and are set around a magnicent green marble bar, inviting clients to experience the nest hospitality. In addition to the classic and world-renowned collections, the boutique features an exclusive selection of unique and rare gem-set Rolex timepieces.


The opening of one of the largest Rolex boutiques in Europe marks a monumental milestone for both the Watches of Switzerland Group and our enduring partnership with Rolex, which has ourished for over a century. At over 7,200 square feet, this boutique will not only showcase the widest array of timepieces, including rare gem-set models, but also redene the luxury retail experience. We have invested in this venture because we are committed to delivering a memorable brand experience with exceptional client experience. This will be a true destination for Rolex enthusiasts, where they can immerse themselves in the heritage and craftsmanship of the brand while enjoying the very best in the product offerings from current ranges, Rolex Certied
Pre-Owned and After-Sales services."
BRIAN DUFFY CEO OF THE WATCHES OF SWITZERLAND GROUP OUR STRATEGY IN ACTION CONTINUED
The agship experience culminates on the second oor, which houses the Rolex Authorised Service Centre, with ve fully trained watchmakers and two technicians ensuring clients can enjoy world-class technical service. This oor emphasises the brand's commitment to craftsmanship, a glass-walled Rolex timepiece workshop offering visitors a glimpse into the state-of-the-art specialist capabilities and technical know-how. With four after-sales desks and consultation areas at their disposal, clients can expect an all-encompassing service experience.
The Watches of Switzerland Group has a long-lasting partnership with Rolex and the Old Bond Street boutique is the jewel in the crown, offering an unmatched retail experience that establishes a new standard in luxury.
Client experience is at the heart of everything that the Watches of Switzerland Group do and working with The AHA Group, we created an unrivalled luxury experience to ensure that the Rolex Old Bond Street boutique is coveted as the destination for Rolex worldwide.
The AHA Group crafts unparalleled, scalable and innovative client experiences that not only drive nancial results but also enhance client loyalty and create passionately engaged clients.
The vision for the client experience in Rolex Old Bond Street was based on honouring Rolex's legacy and providing every guest with a personal experience and a lasting memory – while ensuring consistency, scalability and efciency. We wanted to create an unrivalled luxury experience coveted as the destination for Rolex worldwide. This mission has been the guiding light for the client experiences that we have designed – from the very rst moment coming through the doors through to the last fond farewell, each guest will be treated exceptionally. The client experiences at this boutique are guided by a 140-page Experience Playbook brought to life by the nest teams in luxury retail.
The partnership between Antonia Hock, Founder & President of The AHA Group, and the Watches of Switzerland Group was established in 2021, when the Group launched Xenia – our in-house elevated Client Experience Programme which is now used across the Group. The Rolex Old Bond Street boutique is the pinnacle of this luxury client experience, delivering an unmatched retail experience that establishes a new standard in luxury.
This boutique offers guests and clients an unparalleled experience that brings the world of Rolex to life. Each detail – from the design of the space to the carefully crafted luxury moments – underpins a commitment to delivering the highest standards in luxury retail. It was a pleasure to work alongside the best teams in the industry to bring these client experiences to life for Rolex acionados worldwide. When the doors open on Old Bond Street, delightful experiences await every guest!"
ANTONIA J.A. HOCK FOUNDER & PRESIDENT OF THE AHA GROUP


In October 2024, the Watches of Switzerland Group announced the acquisition of the editorial, limited edition product and insurance business of Hodinkee, uniting the leading watch retailer and the digital trailblazer with the goal of supporting Hodinkee's continued operation as a leader in the watch community. The acquisition created an alignment between the Watches of Switzerland Group and Hodinkee, two pioneering businesses jointly dedicated to the betterment of the watch industry.
With a history of stewarding brands, the Group is utilising its leadership role in the industry to further Hodinkee's mission in sharing the most engaging, educational and entertaining watch content. This acquisition signicantly impacts its leadership position by, among other things, providing unmatched insight to the world's leading watch editorial entity as well as access to one of the most developed watch enthusiast communities in the industry.
As part of the acquisition, Hodinkee founder, and former CEO, Ben Clymer returned to his leading position for the company, for the rst time since 2020. Hodinkee is run independently as a leading editorial media organisation under the Watches of Switzerland Group umbrella. In a decision based in protecting an integral component of the industry, both teams have a shared goal in growing the global watch community and continuing Hodinkee's journalism, ensuring the entire watch industry can continue its faith in Hodinkee's unique voice and lens through which they present unmatched editorial content.
The Group also acquired functions behind Hodinkee's insurance programme. In partnership with Chubb, the premier insurer of valuable collections, Hodinkee offers maximised protection for watches and jewellery.

Links to strategic pillars:


We align ourselves with brands who inspire us, and whose partnership offers a mutually benecial outcome. Hodinkee distinguishes itself in the world of horology, and while our goal is to provide Hodinkee with a home to continue to ourish, we are proud to gain valuable insights from their groundbreaking team and operation."
BRIAN DUFFY CEO OF THE WATCHES OF SWITZERLAND GROUP
Since its founding in 2008, Hodinkee has become the pre-eminent resource for modern and vintage wristwatch enthusiasts. Founder and CEO, Ben Clymer and his team of writers are known for their innate understanding of both historical references and the most cutting-edge haute horlogerie, and more importantly, can explain them in a way that is both entertaining and easy to understand. The Hodinkee team circles the globe looking for the most interesting stories about watches, watch collectors, watchmakers and more, and then tells those stories across a diverse group of multimedia channels. Hodinkee is the horological touchpoint for other news, business and lifestyle media, too.
Hodinkee also announced that award-winning journalist Andy Hoffman has joined the Hodinkee editorial team as Senior Business Editor. Based in Geneva, Switzerland, Andy brings exceptional depth of expertise through his career spanning Bloomberg News and The Globe and Mail.


Hodinkee is the leading global platform for watch collectors and luxury enthusiasts. The global audience is highly engaged and connected with the Hodinkee brand across all platforms. Hodinkee reaches passionate, knowledgeable and highly engaged communities across social media channels globally.
The acquisition of the Hodinkee business will help drive online leadership in the US, through leveraging the high-quality trafc and client base that Hodinkee holds. In May 2025 we re-platformed our Watches of Switzerland US ecommerce site to Shopify, which provides a seamless link between Hodinkee and the Watches of Switzerland platform.
Ben and his team have begun hosting exclusive events within our showrooms in both the US and UK. This will become a feature of how our two businesses can work together in partnership.
TOTAL ACTIVE USERS
SOCIAL MEDIA
1.5m SOCIAL MEDIA FOLLOWERS Q& A BEN CLYMER , HODINKEE
Why do you consider the acquisition of Hodinkee by the Watches of Switzerland Group positive for the future of the business?

Since Hodinkee's founding in 2008, we've always known we wanted to nd a home for it that would help expand our mission to share the love of watches with as many people as possible. With the Watches of Switzerland Group's role as one of the largest, strongest and oldest retailers in the English speaking world – not to mention one with a leadership team with whom we've been friends for approaching ten years now – it just made great sense to join forces. We really believe that together, we can serve the global watch community in a whole new way.
| What has been your rst impressions since joining the Group? |
There are two things I've really come to appreciate in these rst six months: 1) the operational efciency of such a large, global organisation – something I denitely want to learn from and apply to what we do at Hodinkee and 2) the strength of the team. These people really know their strengths and weaknesses and lead in a special way, while never being afraid to ask questions. It's been great so far, top to bottom. |
||
|---|---|---|---|
| Are you concerned Hodinkee will lose editorial impartiality by being part of the Group? |
Simply stated, not in the least. Every publication on earth is owned by someone – including those that cite their impartiality daily – and part of the excitement behind this partnership is that the Group works with almost every single brand on this earth as a retail partner, and on the pre-owned side, literally |
every brand. The Group, like Hodinkee, is just here for the greater good of watches – and the Hodinkee team remains completely removed from the goings on of the retail business. We are now, more than ever, encouraged to do things our way.
What are you most excited about for the future?
The most exciting part of the future, to me, will be taking the strengths of Hodinkee, and the strengths of the larger group, and trying some new ways to service our community. There isn't a combination like us out there anywhere else in the world – and in due time, we'll see more people realising that. We can't wait to show you what's next – sincerely.
46
On 8 May 2024, we announced that the Group had acquired the exclusive distribution rights for the Roberto Coin brand in the US, Canada, Central America and the Caribbean, through the acquisition of Roberto Coin's US associated company, Roberto Coin Inc., for a total consideration of £106 million.
The acquisition of Roberto Coin Inc. builds on the Group's proven capabilities in showcasing luxury brands and represents a signicant milestone in our stated strategy to accelerate jewellery growth in the luxury branded jewellery category in the US, the world's largest and fastest growing luxury jewellery market. The transaction marks a step change in the Roberto Coin Inc. retail and distribution strategy, underpinned by our retail and digital expertise and portfolio of showrooms across the US.
Luxury branded jewellery is a core pillar of the Group's growth strategy; the trend within the global luxury jewellery market is towards branded jewellery which made up 27% of the market in 2024, up from 17% in 2019.
The acquisition builds on the Group's proven capabilities in showcasing luxury brands across both watches and jewellery and will signicantly enhance our strategic positioning in the luxury branded jewellery category in the US, the world's largest luxury jewellery market on a per capita basis.
The Group leverages its operational and retailing expertise to drive incremental growth in Roberto Coin Inc., both across Roberto Coin Inc.'s wholesale distribution as well as Direct to Consumer (DTC) in the Group's retail boutiques and online.
Links to strategic pillars:


Roberto Coin is a brand of ne jewellery, whose operational and production headquarters are located in the heart of Vicenza, close to the city of Venice, otherwise known as the City of Gold because of the proliferation of goldsmiths. Roberto Coin jewellery champions the traditional values of Italian artisanship, with Coin's immense creativity and his love of fashion and the arts being channelled through every piece.
The brand has become famous throughout the world for its collections' design and technological innovation, which pay homage to, and revolutionise ancient Italian manufacturing techniques, as well as for its particular 'art of creating new authenticity'.
Roberto Coin, the brand's founder, designer and eclectic businessman, denes his desire to make collections that are always distinct and to guarantee that each piece of jewellery is perceived as unique. Far from standardised, the brand avoids aesthetic traits that would make it easily recognisable.
Roberto Coin prefers that the details of artisanship tell the story of his mission to create beauty – mixing the past with the present and the codes of elegance with the forms of art and architecture that inspire him, particularly as he's walking through the alleyways of Venice, the city where he was born.
Another fundamental element that ties the collections together and has made the brand an icon of renement throughout the world, is a small signature ruby found inside every piece. It's positioned so that it's in contact with the wearer's skin, respecting the ancient legend that rubies could confer a long and happy life. This precious signature has always been the message that the brand dedicates to each of its clients. Loved by movie and fashion stars, Roberto Coin's jewellery takes centre stage on international red carpets and countless editorial pages. In part, this is a result of the brand's tireless ethical commitment, a beacon that has illuminated Roberto Coin since its foundation; a commitment that includes the activities of the Kimberley Process, World Diamond Council, Dodd Frank Act, Responsible Jewellery Council, CIBJO and carbon offsetting.
Today Roberto Coin is universally recognised as a pioneering talent in conceiving new trends and as a man capable of balancing creativity and commerce in the name of a success that is as brilliant as it is responsible.
Roberto's creations have conquered more than 60 countries around the world, the US being the largest market, where the brand is a leader in the jewellery industry.

Christy Turlington, previous ambassador of Roberto Coin
The brand has become famous throughout the world for its collections' design and technological innovation, which pay homage to, and revolutionise ancient Italian manufacturing techniques, as well as for its particular 'art of creating new authenticity'."

The idea of the ruby as a symbolic signature comes from an ancient time and the pages of antique books. A passion for history and mythology led Roberto Coin to discover three very special stories. Three tales that mixed reality and imagination, as is the nature of every true legend, which led him to a fundamental choice for his future.
The legend belongs to the world of ancient Egypt. The pharaohs believed that the ruby was a sort of talisman capable of, if kept in contact with the skin, guaranteeing love, joy and everlasting health.
Roberto Coin found a passionate, meaningful symbol in the ruby and decided to identify the soul and the mission of his creative world with this little precious stone.
In 1996, the launch of the Appassionata collection marked not only the beginning of the brand's history, but also the rst time that the magical signature, a small ruby with an immense story, was set inside every piece of the collection.
The now famous hidden ruby conveys a message of goodwill from Roberto Coin, combining the ardour of courage, the passion of love and the vitality of hope.

After a rst successful career in the world of hospitality in Great Britain, at the age of 32, Roberto Coin decides to return to his home country, Italy and turn a new page in his life. Driven by his natural passion for style and exclusivity, he approaches the jewellery world accompanied by a great will to learn and to dialogue with the main international entrepreneurs and the Italian artisanal maestros who teach him all the secrets of the industry.
In 1996, the crucial decision: creating his own jewellery brand. At this point Roberto Coin's vision and creativity manifest themselves freely, creating collections that are as exclusive and multifaceted as the women who wear them. In a very short time the brand becomes recognised and esteemed worldwide.
Since the beginning, Roberto Coin has signed each one of his creations with a small ruby set inside; a secret message of good wishes dedicated to his clients that over the years has conferred him the nickname of 'The Collector of Rubies'.
Beyond the grand success of his creations, in 2009 and in 2013 Roberto Coin was invested by the Italian Republic with the titles of Grand Ofcer and Commander Order of Merit. He is also a member of the board of directors of the World Diamond Council, the organisation that collaborated with the UN to create the Kimberly Process.
In the last 20 years he has been awarded with many different prizes, relating to the beauty of his collections and also to his direct efforts in corporate social responsibility.
Today, Roberto Coin lives between Vicenza and Venice and continues his travels around the world where he takes inspiration for ve new collections every year.

Since it was founded in 1775, Mappin & Webb has harnessed a rich and storied history within the watch and jewellery industry. Now, as we celebrate 250 years, we continue to embrace tradition with contemporary design, cementing our position as a British treasure built upon the foundations of excellence, superior quality and exquisite craftsmanship.
Our brand story began in 1775, when Jonathan Mappin opened a workshop in Shefeld. His mission was to create the most beautifully crafted silverware for British society.
The years that followed saw the Company expand internationally, receiving Royal Warrants and commissions from Monarchs around the world, and becoming synonymous with excellence, craftsmanship and all things undeniably British.
The Company continued to trade throughout both World Wars and its acclaimed Campaign watch, supplied to the Admiralty in 1914, played an integral role in the brand's widespread popularisation during this time.
Mappin & Webb has been Warrant Holders to all the United Kingdom's sovereigns since 1897, having served ve monarchs over a continuous period of 128 years. Today we continue as Jewellers, Goldsmiths and Silversmiths to His Majesty King Charles III.

Mark Appleby LVO, Crown Jeweller
The Crown Jeweller, Mark Appleby LVO, is an integral part of our business as the Head of Jewellery Services for Mappin & Webb and oversees all the craftsmanship that is produced in our jewellery workshop and studios.
Mark Appleby was appointed to the position of Crown Jeweller in 2017, having also held the position of Personal Jeweller to the Sovereign since 2012. This further cemented the Company's long-standing royal connection, being the 10th person ever to be awarded this incredible honour.
The Crown Jeweller serves as the custodian of the Crown Jewels housed in the Tower of London. He is responsible for their annual maintenance and attends key ceremonial events, including the Royal Maundy Service, Royal Christenings, and Baptisms. He also participates in the State Opening of Parliament and, of course, in highly signicant occasions such as the State Funeral of a Monarch and the subsequent Royal Coronation – both of which Mark Appleby LVO has had the great honour of attending during his tenure as custodian of the Crown Jewels.
It is our great pleasure that in May 2024 we received the Royal Warrant to His Majesty The King as Jewellers, Goldsmiths and Silversmiths. As a grantee of a Royal Warrant, it signies and reinforces our exemplary service, quality and excellence of the highest calibre. The appointment is judged on the sustainability and environmental policies we have in place within the Group and to have been awarded this for ve years is testament to the hard work we have put in within our Company."
KARL BAILEY, SENIOR MANAGER MAPPIN & WEBB, REGENT STREET

Links to strategic pillars:

Mappin & Webb's London Jewellery Workshop services all our Mappin & Webb showrooms for their repairs and restoration needs and is known for its incredible one-off bespoke jewellery pieces.
Our Jewellery Workshop has a highly skilled and professional team of mounters, gemstone setters, renovators and restoration experts, CAD technicians, polishers and gemmologists who, together, channel their passion for jewellery into the most exquisite creations.
There have been several collections of jewellery within our Mappin & Webb showroom that have been overseen by the Crown Jeweller. Inspired by the depths of our archives, these jewellery pieces marry innovation with craftsmanship from design origin to completion, all of which meet the nal exacting standards of the Crown Jeweller.
Mappin & Webb is very proud to not only have its own state-of-the-art Jewellery Workshop, but also a Silver Workshop based in Greater London. Our experienced team consists of silversmiths, polishers, platers and engravers who have worked on some incredible pieces in recent years. From the restoration of mayoral regalia to the traditional professional cricket awards, and the very prestigious Ascot Trophies. Mappin & Webb had the honour of producing these trophies during the year that the late Queen Elizabeth II's horse 'Estimate' won The Queen's Vase and the famous Ascot Gold Cup the following year.
Our Jewellery Workshop has a highly skilled and professional team of mounters, gemstone setters, renovators and restoration experts, CAD technicians, polishers and gemmologists who, together, channel their passion for jewellery into the most exquisite creations."


Mappin & Webb's showrooms present our clients with an unparalleled selection of beautiful watch and jewellery pieces from our luxury brand partners as well as our own luxury jewellery collections, ranging from entry-level diamond pieces to high-end jewellery. In 2023 we unveiled a new contemporary design concept in our Mappin & Webb, York Showroom and we continue to roll out this concept.
We are proud to host luxury watch brands that include Rolex, Cartier, OMEGA, TUDOR and TAG Heuer, alongside our luxury jewellery brand partners. From the romanticism of Roberto Coin to the contemporary vision embraced by Messika, the Italian style and innovative air of FOPE, and the eclectic and emblematic designs from Gucci.
In July 2024, Mappin & Webb became the sole UK retailer of the luxury American jewellery brand, David Yurman in our agship Regent Street showroom. Pomellato, Pasquale Bruni, Fred, Marco Bicego, Repossi and Fabergé are also exciting recent additions to Mappin & Webb's luxury brand portfolio – each harnessing a unique style combined with a rich heritage and distinct craftsmanship.
Within Mappin & Webb we focus on sustainability – an example being the introduction of a contemporary 18ct Yellow Gold collection, designed and crafted by Precious Metal Designs by The Royal Mint, using their pioneering precious metal sourcing technology. The collection is made from a sustainable source of gold provided by The Royal Mint's Precious Metals Recovery factory in South Wales. Using world-rst patented chemistry from the Canadian clean tech company Excir, The Royal Mint has the capability to extract high-quality 999.9 purity gold from e-waste. This recovered high purity gold reduces the dependence on traditional mining and encourages more sustainable industry practices.
We were proud that Mappin & Webb was named CSR Jewellery Retailer of the Year at the Professional Jeweller Awards 2024 for the second year running.
Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) are designed to measure the development, performance and position of the business. Certain KPIs are Alternative Performance Measures (APMs). The Directors use these measures as they provide additional useful information and analyses on the underlying trends, performance and position of the Group. The APMs are not dened by IFRS and therefore may not be directly comparable with other companies' APMs. These measures are not intended to be a substitute for, or superior to, IFRS measures.

| 1 | Business strategy execution and development |
|---|---|
| 2 | Key suppliers and supply chain |
| 3 | Client experience and market risks |
| 4 | Colleague talent and capability |
| 5 | Data protection and cyber security |
| 8 | Economic and political |
|---|---|
| 9 | Brand and reputational damage |
| 10 | Financial and treasury |
| 11 | Climate change |
7 Regulatory and compliance

COMMENTARY
Basic EPS has reduced from 25.0p to 22.8p in the year, reecting the decreased protability in the year (inclusive of exceptional costs detailed in note 4 in the Consolidated Financial Statements). For further detail please refer to note 9 in the
Consolidated Financial Statements.
LINK TO KEY PRINCIPAL RISKS AND UNCERTAINTIES 1 2 3 4 8 9 10
FY25 Adjusted EPS has increased from 38.0p to 41.6p in the year, reecting the increased underlying protability in the year.
For further detail please refer to note 9 in the
LINK TO STRATEGY
PERFORMANCE (p)
PERFORMANCE (%)
19.0%
41.6
FY23 FY24
FY25
FY22 FY21
FY23 FY24
FY25
FY22 FY21
6 Business interruption
FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE

ADJUSTED EARNINGS PER SHARE
23.8
RETURN ON CAPITAL EMPLOYED
41.8
41.6
38.0
52.7
27.4% 27.9%
19.5%
19.0%
19.7%
Basic Earnings Per Share (EPS) is a statutory measure dened by IAS 33. EPS is a direct measure of protability per share held in the Group.
Growing Basic EPS is a key pillar of our business strategy.
DEFINITION AND PURPOSE Basic EPS adjusted for exceptional items as disclosed in note 4 to the Financial Statements. This measure is reconciled to statutory measures in note 9 to the Financial Statements.
This is a measure of prot per share held in the Group, excluding exceptional items and IFRS 16 adjustments. This presents the Group's underlying performance without distortion from one-off or non-trading events to provide comparability between years.
Growing Adjusted EPS is a key pillar of our business strategy. This measure is linked to the Executive performance target for the LTIP incentives.
Further detail can be found in the Remuneration Committee Report on page 193.
Return on Capital Employed (ROCE) is dened as Adjusted EBIT divided by average capital employed. Average capital employed is total assets less current liabilities on a pre-IFRS 16 basis. The calculation for ROCE is included in the Glossary on page 272.
ROCE demonstrates the efciency with which the Group utilises capital, and is a key pillar of our business strategy.
This measure is linked to the Executive performance target for the LTIP incentives. Further detail can be found in the Remuneration Committee Report on page 193.
LINK TO STRATEGY
COMMENTARY
LINK TO KEY PRINCIPAL RISKS AND UNCERTAINTIES 1 2 3 4 8 9 10
Consolidated Financial Statements.
ROCE has reduced by 50bps to 19.0% in the year. Whilst Adjusted EBIT has increased versus the prior year, the decrease is reective of the higher average capital employed to achieve this.
Further details on performance in the year can be found in the Financial Review section on pages 59 to 64.
LINK TO STRATEGY

LINK TO KEY PRINCIPAL RISKS AND UNCERTAINTIES 1 2 8 10
PERFORMANCE (£ MILLION)
£214.1


Luxury watches
US (\$)
Luxury jewellery
5,253 6,035
5,221
FY25 FY24 FY23 FY22 FY21
6,099 6,830
Cash generated from operations is dened under IAS 7 'Statement of Cash Flows'. This is a direct measure of cash generation from the operations of the business excluding nancing, investing, tax and dened benet pension contributions.
Cash generated from operations decreased by £11.4 million but remains strong at £214.1 million in the year.
Further details on cash ow performance in the year can be found in the Financial Review on pages 59 to 64.
LINK TO STRATEGY

LINK TO KEY PRINCIPAL RISKS AND UNCERTAINTIES 1 2 8 10
Average selling price (ASP) represents revenue generated (including sales-related taxes) in the period from sales of the category, divided by the total number of units of such products sold during the period. This metric is a measure of sales performance.
Luxury watches are dened as those that have a Recommended Retail Price greater than £1,000. Luxury jewellery shows retail sales only, and is dened as those that have a Recommended Retail Price greater than £500.
13,246 12,673
12,818
11,476 12,006
The data reects the ASP changes seen in the year as a result of the mix of products sold in each geography.
LINK TO STRATEGY
LINK TO KEY PRINCIPAL RISKS AND UNCERTAINTIES 1 2 8
| 1 | Business strategy execution and development |
|---|---|
| 2 | Key suppliers and supply chain |
| 3 | Client experience and market risks |
| 4 | Colleague talent and capability |
| 5 | Data protection and cyber security |
| 6 | Business interruption |


| 1 | Business strategy execution and development |
7 | Regulatory and compliance |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2 | Key suppliers and supply chain | 8 | Economic and political |
| 3 | Client experience and market risks | 9 | Brand and reputational damage |
| 4 | Colleague talent and capability | 10 | Financial and treasury |
| 5 | Data protection and cyber security | 11 | Climate change |
| 6 | Business interruption | ||


Expand our multi-channel leadership
Continue to advance across ESG indicators

| Income Statement – post-IFRS 16 and exceptional items (£million) |
52 weeks ended 27 April 2025 |
52 weeks ended 28 April 2024 |
YoY variance |
|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | 1,651.5 | 1,537.9 | 7% |
| Operating pro™t | 113.9 | 120.0 | (5)% |
| Net nance cost | (38.0) | (27.9) | (36)% |
| Pro™t before taxation | 75.9 | 92.1 | (18)% |
| Taxation | (22.1) | (33.0) | 33% |
| Pro™t for the ™nancial period | 53.8 | 59.1 | (9)% |
| Basic earnings per share | 22.8p | 25.0p | (9)% |
Management monitors and assesses the business performance on a pre-IFRS 16 and exceptional items basis, which is shown below. This aligns to the reporting used to inform business decisions, investment appraisals, incentive schemes and debt covenants. A full reconciliation between the pre- and post-IFRS 16 results is shown in the Glossary.
| Income Statement – pre-IFRS 16 and exceptional items (£million) |
52 weeks ended 27 April 2025 |
52 weeks ended 28 April 2024 |
YoY variance |
|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | 1,651.5 | 1,537.9 | 7% |
| Net margin1 | 598.6 | 562.2 | 6% |
| Showroom costs | (292.7) | (289.1) | (1)% |
| 4-Wall EBITDA1 | 305.9 | 273.1 | 12% |
| Overheads | (106.5) | (85.3) | (25)% |
| EBITDA1 | 199.4 | 187.8 | 6% |
| Showroom opening and closing costs | (6.9) | (8.9) | 22% |
| Share of loss of joint venture and associates | (0.2) | – | – |
| Adjusted EBITDA1 | 192.3 | 178.9 | 8% |
| Depreciation, amortisation and loss on disposal of xed assets |
(42.6) | (44.2) | 4% |
| Adjusted EBIT1 (Segment prot) |
149.7 | 134.7 | 11% |
| Net nance costs | (13.6) | (5.8) | (138)% |
| Adjusted pro™t before taxation1 | 136.1 | 128.9 | 6% |
| Adjusted earnings per share1 | 41.6p | 38.0p | 9% |
1 This is an Alternative Performance Measure and is shown on a pre-IFRS 16 basis. Refer to the Glossary on pages 270 to 273 for denition, purpose and reconciliation to statutory measures where relevant.
| Total revenue | 865.9 | 785.6 | 1,651.5 | 100% |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Services/other | 71.4 | 16.1 | 87.5 | 5% |
| Eliminations | – | (4.5) | (4.5) | – |
| Luxury jewellery wholesale | – | 110.8 | 110.8 | 7% |
| Luxury jewellery3 | 65.0 | 39.2 | 104.2 | 6% |
| Luxury watches2 | 729.5 | 624.0 | 1,353.5 | 82% |
| 52 weeks ended 27 April 2025 (£million) |
UK and Europe |
US | Total | Mix |
| Total revenue | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Services/other | 74.6 | 16.2 | 90.8 | 6% |
| Luxury jewellery | 62.1 | 40.3 | 102.4 | 7% |
| Luxury watches | 709.4 | 635.3 | 1,344.7 | 87% |
| 52 weeks ended 28 April 2024 (£million) |
UK and Europe |
US | Total | Mix |
Group revenue was up vs prior year at £1,651.5 million (+8% on a constant currency basis), with an improved second half performance at +12%.
Group revenue from luxury watches grew by +1% on the prior year. As anticipated, revenue was impacted by one-off increases in showroom inventory levels to enhance displays and client experience in Q1 FY25, particularly in the US, with stronger performance in the second half of the year. Demand for our key brands, particularly products on Registration of Interest lists, continues to be strong, with consistent additions and conversions.
We continue to be encouraged by the performance of our pre-owned business with Rolex Certied Pre-Owned now in 21 agencies in the US and 25 in the UK. Luxury Watches made up 82% of revenue versus 87% in the prior year, with the acquisition of Roberto Coin Inc. in the period contributing to a higher luxury jewellery mix.
Group luxury jewellery revenue, excluding wholesale, increased by 2% on the prior year, boosted by improved trends in the UK at +5%. US luxury jewellery sales continue to be impacted by market trends in the bridal category. The majority of luxury jewellery sold by the Group is retailed under our house brands of Goldsmiths, Mappin & Webb, Mayors and Betteridge. Our strategy is to grow our luxury branded jewellery offering, where we partner with other major luxury jewellery brands. Luxury branded jewellery sales continue to signicantly outperform non-branded jewellery.
On 8 May 2024, the Group signed and completed the acquisition of the entire share capital of Roberto Coin Inc., the exclusive distributor of Roberto Coin in the US, Canada, Central America and the Caribbean. Wholesale revenue in the period was £110.8 million, in line with expectations. The business continues to work positively with retail partners post-acquisition.
Services/other revenue, consisting of servicing, repairs, insurance services and the sale of fashion and classic watches and other non-luxury jewellery, declined by 4%.
Group ecommerce4 sales declined by 5% compared to the prior year, impacted by the mix of products sold through this channel and performance of the UK market. We continue to be the market leader in ecommerce for luxury watches and jewellery in the UK, and are growing our proposition in the US.
On 3 October 2024, the Group completed the acquisition of the editorial, insurance and limited-edition businesses of Hodinkee, the pre-eminent global digital editorial content provider, to support our objectives to leverage sector leadership online.
US revenue increased by 16% year-on-year in constant currency (14% reported) and the US business made up 48% of the Group's revenue in FY25 (FY24: 45%). Revenue and EBIT growth was driven by the Roberto Coin Inc. acquisition.
During the year, the US opened two showrooms, a Rolex boutique in Lenox, Atlanta and a Cartier anchored Watches of Switzerland showroom at Ross Park, Pittsburgh. A further ve showroom projects were completed in the year, including signicant projects with Rolex and Patek Philippe.
UK and Europe revenue increased by 2% during the year, showing sequential improvement to +6% in H2 FY25. Sales in the UK were driven by a domestic clientele. Tourist sales continue to remain low, particularly on account of the removal of VAT free shopping for tourists. We have seen a continued stabilisation of the UK market in both luxury watches and jewellery, following a period of volatile conditions in the prior nancial year.
During the year, we opened one mono-brand boutique in the UK, and a further multi-brand Mappin & Webb showroom in Edinburgh. 14 UK non-core showrooms were closed, allowing us to consolidate our portfolio and drive productivity across our estate. A further ten showrooms will close in Q1 FY26.
In March the new Rolex agship boutique on Old Bond Street opened and trading has exceeded expectations since opening. A further ve projects were completed enhancing our existing estate to further elevate the partner brands we display in those showrooms and advance our client experience. Signicant progress has been made on our exit from Europe. Three showrooms closed in the period and four sold to brand partners. The remaining two boutiques were sold to brand partners in early FY26.
ANNUAL REPORT AND ACCOUNTS 2025
2 Luxury watches are dened as those that have a Recommended Retail Price greater than £1,000.
3 Luxury jewellery is dened as those that have a Recommended Retail Price greater than £500.
4 Ecommerce sales are sales which are transacted online.
| Pro™tability as a % of revenue | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Income Statement – pre-IFRS 16 and exceptional items (£million) |
52 weeks ended 27 April 2025 |
52 weeks ended 28 April 2024 |
YoY variance |
| Net margin1 | 36.3% | 36.6% | (30)bps |
| Showroom costs | 17.7% | 18.8% | (110)bps |
| 4-Wall EBITDA1 | 18.5% | 17.8% | 70bps |
| Adjusted EBITDA1 | 11.6% | 11.6% | –bps |
| Adjusted EBIT1 | 9.1% | 8.8% | 30bps |
Net margin as a % of revenue was 36.3% in the year. This was 30bps lower than the prior year driven by product mix and higher promotional activity, partly offset by savings on the cost of Interest Free Credit from the reduction in average term time from removing the four-year offer.
Showroom costs increased by £3.6 million (1%) from the prior year, to £292.7 million. This reects the opening of new showrooms, and the annualisation of prior year openings, including acquisitions and annual pay rises to colleagues. This was partly offset by efciencies found within digital marketing investment which continues to maximise trafc and conversion versus cost.
Overheads increased by £21.2 million (25%) principally due to the acquisition of Roberto Coin Inc.. Remaining cost increases are due to IT investment to support future growth, annual pay rises to colleagues, along with the opening of our new US Support Centre in Florida. This was partly offset by strong cost control and efciencies within marketing.
Showroom opening and closing costs include the cost of rent (pre-IFRS 16), rates and payroll prior to the opening or closing of showrooms, or during closures when refurbishments are taking place. This cost will vary annually depending on the scale of expansion in the year.
Exceptional items are dened by the Group as those which are signicant in magnitude or are linked to events which are expected to be infrequent in nature. The majority of the items below do not have a cash impact.
| Exceptional items (£million) | 52 weeks ended 27 April 2025 |
52 weeks ended 28 April 2024 |
|---|---|---|
| Rolex Old Bond Street | 4.2 | 2.5 |
| Showroom impairment | 44.5 | 21.2 |
| Showroom closures | 6.2 | – |
| European showroom impairment | 0.7 | 8.6 |
| Business acquisitions | 2.1 | 3.3 |
| Reversal of inventory provision created on acquisition | – | (2.4) |
| Total exceptional items | 57.7 | 33.2 |
| Of which impacts: | ||
| Operating prot | 55.5 | 31.9 |
| Net nance costs | 2.2 | 1.3 |
A new 7,200 sq. ft showroom was built and opened during the year in partnership with Rolex. This new agship is our largest Rolex showroom and reects the importance of the London market and the special relevance of London to the history of Rolex. The cost shown here is the IFRS 16 depreciation and interest costs incurred whilst the showroom was being constructed. They are deemed to be exceptional in nature given that this unique proposition results in a project size and complexity signicantly outside of a standard build, coupled with documented project delays outside of the Group's control. Costs shown are prior to the showroom opening on 14 March 2025.
The current macroeconomic environment, high interest rates and inationary landscape gave rise to indicators of impairment in the current period. Consequently, discounted cash ows were performed on all Cash Generating Units (CGUs) with indicators of impairment. This resulted in a non-cash impairment charge of £43.6 million being recorded in the period. This is allocated over the right-of-use assets and the property, plant and equipment of those showrooms as required by IAS 36 'Impairment of Assets'. A further provision of £1.6 million relates to associated onerous contracts. A lease surrender gain of £0.7 million was also recognised in exceptionals, as the original write-off was presented in exceptionals in the prior year.
In April 2025 the closure of a number of UK showrooms was announced as the Group continually assesses its operations to remain as efcient and productive as possible. The exceptional costs are reective of asset write downs, other onerous costs and redundancy costs.
As announced during the prior year, the Group's intention has been to reallocate investment from Europe into the UK and US. During the year the Group has closed or transferred a further seven showrooms.
Professional and legal expenses on business combinations have been expensed to the Consolidated Income Statement as an exceptional cost as they are regarded as non-trading, non-underlying costs and are considered to be material by nature. Similarly, the costs associated with the integration of Roberto Coin Inc., and the Hodinkee business have also been expensed as exceptional items.
As a result of the items noted above, Adjusted EBIT was £149.7 million, an increase of £15.0 million, +11% on the prior year.
After accounting for exceptional costs of £55.5 million and IFRS 16 adjustments of £19.7 million, operating prot as presented on the face of the Consolidated Income Statement was £113.9 million, a decrease of 5% on the prior year.
| Net ™nance costs (£million) | 52 weeks ended 27 April 2025 |
52 weeks ended 28 April 2024 |
|---|---|---|
| Pre-IFRS 16 net ™nance costs, excluding exceptionals | 13.6 | 5.8 |
| IFRS 16 interest on lease liabilities | 22.2 | 20.8 |
| Total net ™nance costs, excluding exceptionals | 35.8 | 26.6 |
Interest payable on borrowings increased in the period, reecting the new facilities drawn down to fund the Roberto Coin Inc. acquisition, together with the annualisation of borrowing to fund the acquisition of 15 showrooms from Ernest Jones in the prior year. The impact was a net increase in the pre-IFRS 16 interest charge of £7.8 million to £13.6 million. The IFRS 16 interest on lease liabilities increased by £1.4 million due to recent additions to the lease portfolio as we continue to invest in showroom portfolio expansion.
Details of a further £2.2 million of exceptional nance costs are given in note 4 of the Consolidated Financial Statements.
The pre-IFRS 16 Effective Tax Rate (ETR) for the period before exceptional items was 27.8%. The statutory (post-IFRS 16 and including exceptionals) effective tax rate was 29.1%.
This is higher than the applicable UK corporation tax rate for the year of 25.0% as a result of higher chargeable taxes on US prots, the impact of expenses disallowed for corporation tax, and non-recognition of deferred taxes in Europe. The impact of the US rate differential is lower than the prior year impact due to the mix of revenue between states. The impact of the non-recognition of deferred taxes in Europe has also reduced year-on-year due to the lower activity in these countries following our announced exit from Europe.
Full detail can be found in note 8 within the Consolidated Financial Statements.
| Balance Sheet (£million) | 27 April 2025 |
28 April 2024 |
|---|---|---|
| Goodwill and intangibles | 304.1 | 215.7 |
| Investment in joint venture and associates | 0.5 | – |
| Property, plant and equipment | 192.4 | 191.4 |
| Right-of-use assets | 358.6 | 381.8 |
| Inventories | 447.4 | 393.3 |
| Trade and other receivables | 60.5 | 24.6 |
| Trade and other payables | (259.5) | (216.5) |
| Lease liabilities | (454.6) | (460.4) |
| Net (debt)/cash1 | (96.2) | 0.7 |
| Other | (13.6) | (7.6) |
| Net assets | 539.6 | 523.0 |
Goodwill and intangibles increased by £88.4 million as a result of the Roberto Coin Inc. and the Hodinkee business acquisitions in the year which gave rise to £98.1 million of goodwill and intangibles, offset by £1.1 million amortisation of brands and agency agreement, and a £9.8 million adverse exchange impact. The most signicant intangible asset recognised on acquisition is £57.2 million for the supply agreement licence with Roberto Coin S.p.A. which is non-amortising as it extends into perpetuity. A further £3.6 million of computer software additions were made in the year as part of ongoing IT developments, offset by amortisation of £2.2 million and disposals of £0.2 million.
Property, plant and equipment increased by £1.0 million in the year. Additions of £69.0 million were offset by depreciation of £40.8 million, impairments of £19.7 million, and loss on disposal and foreign exchange movements of £7.5 million.
Including software costs, which are disclosed as intangibles, capital additions (including accruals) were £71.6 million in the year, of which £68.8 million was expansionary. Expansionary capex relates to new showrooms, relocations or major refurbishments (dened as costing over £0.25 million). In the year, the Group opened four new showrooms and refurbished 11 showrooms. Investment in our portfolio is paramount to our strategy and the Group follows a disciplined payback policy when making capital investment decisions.
Right-of-use assets decreased by £23.2 million in the year, to £358.6 million. Additions to the lease portfolio along with lease renewals or other lease changes were £69.5 million. This has been offset by depreciation of £56.5 million and impairments of £26.8 million. The remaining movement is a £9.4 million adverse foreign exchange impact.
Lease liabilities decreased by £5.8 million in the year. The portfolio changes noted above increased the lease liability by £61.6 million. Interest charged on the lease liability was £24.4 million and there was a £11.2 million favourable foreign exchange impact. Lease payments were £80.6 million, giving a nal lease liability balance of £454.6 million.
Inventory levels increased by £54.1 million (14%) compared to the prior year. £53.9 million of inventory was acquired as part of the Roberto Coin Inc. acquisition, and the Group increased pre-owned watches and Rolex Certied Pre-Owned volume by £13.3 million. This has been offset through a reduction in underlying inventory to maintain stock turn at appropriate levels. The inventory obsolescence risk remains low for the Group.
Trade and other receivables increased by £35.9 million compared to FY24. Notable reasons for the increase being: £18.3 million of wholesale trade receivables under Roberto Coin Inc.; £8.8 million held in escrow in relation to business combinations (see note 25 of the Consolidated Financial Statements); investment into the joint venture; and invoices raised for Hodinkee advertising revenue at the period end. The balance also represents prepayments, rebate receivables, rent deposits and other ad hoc receivables such as property contributions.
Trade and other payables increased by £43.0 million. Notable reasons for the increase being: £10.9 million of trade payables and £18.2 million of other payables (including deposits taken and the sales return provision) under Roberto Coin Inc.; £8.8 million held in escrow; and £7.9 million of deferred consideration payable in relation to business combinations (see note 25 of the Consolidated Financial Statements).
Other includes taxation balances, dened benet pension and capitalised nance costs.
Net debt on 27 April 2025 was £96.2 million, an increase of £96.9 million since 28 April 2024. The strong free cash ow of £97.8 million being utilised for £72.6 million of expansionary capex, £106.9 million relating to the Roberto Coin Inc. and the Hodinkee business acquisitions and £11.3 million for the purchase of own shares as part of the share buyback programme.
Net debt post-IFRS 16 was £548.5 million. The value comprises the pre-IFRS 16 net debt of £96.2 million and the £454.6 million lease liability, offset by capitalised transaction costs of £2.3 million. The balance increased by £90.5 million (from £458.0 million) in the period, principally driven by the acquisition spend.
The Group's maximum amount available under its committed facility was £368.9 million at 27 April 2025.
| Facilities held | Expiring | Amount (million) |
|---|---|---|
| Multicurrency revolving loan facility – UK SONIA +1.50% to +2.55% |
May 2028 | £275.0 |
| Multicurrency term facility – UK SONIA +1.65% to +2.70% | May 2028 | \$125.0 |
On 13 December 2024, the Group renanced and repaid its \$115.0 million term loan facility which was originally taken out to nance the Roberto Coin Inc. acquisition with a new £150.0 million facility (comprising a £100.0 million term loan and an incremental £50.0 million revolving loan facility). The £100.0 million was drawn down on 13 December 2024 as \$125.0 million and no further drawdown on the £100.0 million is permitted. The new facilities run coterminously with the existing UK bank facility of £225.0 million.
£195.1 million of these facilities were drawn down at 27 April 2025. Liquidity headroom (dened as unrestricted cash plus undrawn available facilities) was £253.5 million. Further detail with regards to covenant tests and liquidity headroom can be found in borrowings note 19 within the Consolidated Financial Statements.
| Cash ¨ow (£million) | 52 weeks ended 27 April 2025 |
52 weeks ended 28 April 2024 |
|---|---|---|
| Adjusted EBITDA | 192.3 | 178.9 |
| Share-based payments | 1.8 | 2.1 |
| Share of loss of joint venture and associates | 0.2 | – |
| Working capital | (52.2) | (20.3) |
| Pension contributions | (0.7) | (0.7) |
| Tax | (29.7) | (33.5) |
| Cash generated from operating activities | 111.7 | 126.5 |
| Maintenance capex | (2.8) | (2.7) |
| Net interest | (11.1) | (6.2) |
| Free cash ¨ow1 | 97.8 | 117.6 |
| Free cash ¨ow conversion1 | 51% | 66% |
| Expansionary capex | (72.6) | (78.0) |
| Acquisitions | (106.9) | (44.2) |
| Investment in joint venture and associates | (0.7) | – |
| Purchase of own shares for employee incentive schemes | – | (7.2) |
| Share buyback | (11.3) | – |
| Renancing costs | (1.5) | (2.2) |
| Disposal of European property, plant and equipment | 2.7 | – |
| Exceptional items – cash | (8.6) | (2.5) |
| Cash ¨ow | (101.1) | (16.5) |
| Net proceeds/(repayment) of borrowings | 85.7 | (5.0) |
| Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents | (15.4) | (21.5) |
Free cash ow decreased by £19.8 million to £97.8 million in the year to 27 April 2025 and free cash ow conversion was 51% compared to 66% in the prior year, primarily as a result of a higher working capital outow in the period. This related to the timing of trade creditor payments and the change of payment terms from certain suppliers. Excluding the change in payment terms, free cash ow conversion would have been 71%.
Expansionary cash capex of £72.6 million was lower than the prior year due to a decrease in new showroom openings and refurbishments. In the year, the Group opened four new showrooms, and refurbished 11 showrooms.
£11.3 million of shares were purchased and paid for in the period as part of the share buyback programme. The balance of the £25 million buyback programme was completed in June 2025.
Exceptional cash items of £8.6 million, includes Rolex Old Bond Street preopening rent, business acquisition and integration costs, and showroom exit costs as detailed in note 4 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
| 52 weeks ended 27 April 2025 |
52 weeks ended 28 April 2024 |
||
|---|---|---|---|
| ROCE | 19.0% | 19.5% |
FY25 ROCE is 19.0%, a decrease of 50bps in comparison to the prior year. Adjusted EBIT increased by 11% to £149.7 million, however Average Capital Employed during this period increased by 14% leading to the reduction.
The Group has a clear framework of capital allocation and is focused on optimising capital deployment for the benet of all our stakeholders, with a focus on long-term sustainable growth in the business. It is also important for the Group to maintain nancial and operational exibility to be able to react tactically to opportunities, such as strategic acquisitions, at speed.
Our capital allocation framework is as follows:
As at 27 April 2025, the Group had 208 showrooms. The movement in showroom numbers is included below:
| UK multi-brand showrooms |
UK mono-brand boutiques |
Europe mono-brand boutiques |
Total UK and Europe |
US multi-brand showrooms |
US mono-brand boutiques |
Total US | Total Group | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 28 April 2024 | 99 | 59 | 9 | 167 | 25 | 31 | 56 | 223 |
| Openings | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 4 |
| Acquisitions | – | – | – | – | – | 4 | 4 | 4 |
| Closures | (11) | (3) | (7) | (21) | (1) | (1) | (2) | (23) |
| 27 April 2025 | 89 | 57 | 2 | 148 | 25 | 35 | 60 | 208 |
The following table sets out where stakeholders of Watches of Switzerland Group PLC can nd relevant non-nancial and sustainability information within this Annual Report and Accounts further to the Financial Reporting Directive requirements contained in Sections 414CA and 414CB of the Companies Act 2006.
This Non-Financial and Sustainability Information Statement highlights information necessary for an understanding of the Company's development, performance, position and impact of its activity, information relating to environmental, colleagues, social matters, respect for human rights, anti-bribery, corruption and fraud matters. The information listed below is incorporated by cross references to other areas of the Annual Report and Accounts and the Company website where further information can be found.
| Key matters | Relevant policies and procedures which govern our approach | Pages |
|---|---|---|
| Climate-related nancial disclosures | Task Force on Climate-Related Financial Disclosures report | 114 to 131 |
| Analysis of resilience | 123 to 126 | |
| Risk Management | 127 | |
| Companies Act 2006 | 142 to 143 | |
| Taking action on climate change | Our Supplier Sustainability Standards set out our net-zero GHG emissions goal and the actions we need to take within our value chain to achieve them |
102 to 109 |
| Reducing our impact | Our Environment Policy, Vendor Code of Conduct and Supplier Sustainability Standards promote | 102 to 105 |
| on the environment* | the efcient use of resources and energy in our supply chain and ensures a Group-wide commitment to continual improvement and compliance with environmental legislations and regulations |
134 to 136 |
| Providing sustainable solutions* | Our Modern Slavery Statement includes key performance indicators | 137 |
| COLLEAGUES | ||
| Key matters | Relevant policies and procedures | Pages |
| Encouraging colleagues to raise matters of concern* |
Where colleagues have concerns about suspected wrongdoing, misconduct or malpractice connected to the Group they can report such concerns on a condential and anonymous basis, and without fear of retaliation, using our Whistleblowing Policy and procedures |
142 |
| Investing in our people and a diverse workforce |
Our Diversity & Inclusion Policy ensures that colleagues are treated fairly and equally and that diversity and inclusion is embraced |
82 to 83 |
| Providing our colleagues with a safe working environment |
We are committed to maintaining safety standards that comply with legislation and enable colleagues to be condent that their workplace is safe |
84 |
| SOCIAL MATTERS | ||
| Key matters | Relevant policies and procedures | Pages |
| Developing responsible supply chains* | Our Vendor Code of Conduct and Supplier Sustainability Standards include measures taken to ensure that products are sourced responsibly and that adequate standards are maintained throughout our supply chain |
102 and 135 |
| Promoting a healthy corporate culture | Our Values underline the way we conduct business and recognise we will only continue to be successful if we grow protability and conduct our business in a way which impacts all of our stakeholders in a positive way |
74 |
| Business standards of behaviour* | Our Code of Ethics ensures that all business is conducted in a fair and ethical manner with the highest levels of integrity and professional standards globally |
142 |
| ANTI-BRIBERY, CORRUPTION AND FRAUD | ||
| Key matters | Relevant policies and procedures | Pages |
| Prevention of bribery, corruption | Our Anti-Bribery, Corruption & Fraud Policy outlines the behaviours and principles required of colleagues | 142 |
and fraud*
| Key matters | Relevant policies and procedures | Pages |
|---|---|---|
| Approach to human rights and modern slavery* |
Approved annually, by the Board, our Modern Slavery Statement sets out the steps that we take to ensure, as far as possible, that slavery and trafcking do not exist in our supply chain or in any part of our business |
137 |
| Human Rights Policy |
A description of our business model can be found on page 26.
Where principal risks have been identied in relation to any of the matters listed above, these can be found on page 148. Our non-nancial key performance indicators can be found on page 65.
to prevent any form of bribery, corruption or fraud
Promoting ethical supply chains* Our Vendor Code of Conduct denes the principles and standards we expect suppliers to understand
* Find out more about our policies in the Governance section on our corporate website thewosgroupplc.com
and adhere to
102
We believe that in order to maximise value and deliver long-term success, it is critical that we understand who our key stakeholders are. This will enable us to build relationships, engage in proactive and constructive dialogue, and to ensure we deliver on what is important to them. To that end, engagement with all of our stakeholders plays a vital role in delivering our Group strategy. The Board has carried out a stakeholder mapping exercise, which it reviews annually. The parties below have been identied as those most likely to be affected by its principal decisions.

Section 172(1) of the Companies Act 2006 requires that the directors of a company must act in the way they consider, in good faith, would be most likely to promote the success of the company for the benet of its members as a whole, having regard to each of its stakeholders and taking into account the factors listed in Section 172(1) (a) to (f). The Board therefore considers the views of each of its stakeholders as part of the decision-making process. Additional examples of governance in action can be found on pages 171 and 172.
Our Colleagues – see pages 78 to 91 and page 172. The strength of our business is built on the hard work and dedication of all our colleagues. We give colleagues every reason to join, grow and stay with our Group through attracting and retaining talent, building an organisation t for the future and leveraging our unique culture.
Clients – see pages 18 and 26. Our clients remain at the centre of everything we do. By purchasing our products, our clients ensure our viability as a business. We strive to meet and exceed our clients' expectations through our Xenia client service programme and providing them with highly creative products of exceptional quality.
Brand partners and other suppliers – see pages 28 to 33. Our brand partners are an integral part of our business to manufacture and allocate their product to us. Our other suppliers provide us with the products and services that are essential to operate our business
Investors – see pages 170 and 172. All investors are treated fairly and have equal access to both company information and our Board of Directors. We also engage with the investment community, advisers and potential shareholders.
Communities – see pages 92 to 99 and page 172. Communities and the wider public expect us to act as a responsible company and neighbour. We strive to drive positive change in our communities through our volunteering programme, supporting The Watches of Switzerland Group Foundation and acting as a responsible employer.
| Colleagues | S172(1) (b) The interests of the Company's employees |
|---|---|
| Clients | S172(1) (c) The need to foster the Company's business relationships with suppliers, customers and others |
| S172(1) (e) The desirability of the Company maintaining a reputation for high standards of business conduct |
|
| Brand partners and other |
S172(1) (c) The need to foster the company's business relationships with suppliers, customers and others |
| suppliers | S172(1) (e) The desirability of the company maintaining a reputation for high standards of business conduct |
| Investors | S172(1) (f) The need to act fairly between members of the Company |
| Communities | S172(1) (d) The impact of the Company's operations on the community and the environment |


Our approach to ESG is rooted in the belief that long-term commercial success goes hand in hand with environmental responsibility, social impact and strong governance.
Anchored in our ESG Strategy, we continue to embed ESG considerations across our Group in order to WOW our clients while caring for our colleagues, our communities and our planet.
In FY25, we continued to make progress in key areas, including becoming Great Place to Work-Certied™, improving energy efciency and strengthening our procurement and supply chain management functions. As expectations evolve, we remain focused on transparency, accountability and delivering meaningful progress aligned with the priorities and values of our stakeholders.
71
During the year, we carried out our rst structured mapping exercise aligned with the UK Transition Plan Taskforce (TPT) framework.
While we have already taken steps to address climate-related risks and opportunities through our broader ESG strategy, this marks our rst formal alignment with the TPT framework, helping to ensure our approach to climate mitigation and management is structured, decision-useful and in line with emerging best practice.
Our mapping assesses our existing information against the relevant disclosure elements of the TPT framework. Internally, we are continuing to develop our strategic actions and rene supporting KPIs. We intend to formally align our reporting with the TPT framework in subsequent reporting cycles.
We remain committed to achieving net-zero emissions by 2050 and have set near-term science-based targets (SBTs) as part of our decarbonisation pathway. However, we recognise that we did not meet our emissions reduction trajectory in FY25 for location-based emissions, largely due to our continued business growth and associated increases in emissions, which reinforces the need to strengthen our implementation plans as we scale.
In FY26, we intend to set long-term SBTs and apply for validation by the Science Based Targets initiative (SBTi) re-calibrating our alignment with a 1.5°C pathway.
Our approach considers the specic context of the retail and luxury goods sector, and is aligned with the evolving expectations of the Task Force on Climate-Related Financial Disclosures (TCFD) and International Sustainability Standards Board (ISSB) frameworks.
This work is a pivotal foundational step in building a resilient and future-ready business and supports the future development of a full transition plan and integration of climate considerations across our Group.
| Transition Plan Taskforce Mapping | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1. Foundation | Page(s) | |
| 1.1 Objectives | How the Group Creates Value: Planet and Product | 27 |
| and priorities | Continue to Advance Across ESG Indicators | 37 |
| Our Strategy in Action Certied Pre-Owned Programme & Repairs and Servicing |
34 | |
| Key Performance Indicators: ESG | 58 | |
| Environmental, Social and Governance: Key Targets and Highlights |
37 | |
| Caring For Our Planet: Climate Action | 103 | |
| TCFD: Goal and Strategies | 129 | |
| TCFD: Risk Management | 127 | |
| 1.2 Business model implications |
Market Review: Pre-owned watch market and Repairs & Servicing |
14 |
| 1.3 Key assumptions | TCFD: Emissions Methodology | 131 |
| and external factors | TCFD: Emissions Rebaselining Policy | 131 |
| TCFD: Qualitative Climate Scenario Analysis | 121 | |
| Transition Plan Taskforce Mapping | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2. Implementation strategy | Page(s) | |
| 2.1 Business planning | Planet: Transition Planning | 103 |
| and operations | Planet: Total Scope 1, 2 and 3 | 130 |
| Planet: Energy Management, Clean Energy | 105 and | |
| & Building Management | 106 | |
| Planet: Transportation & Logistics | 107 | |
| Planet: Risk Management | 127 | |
| 2.2 Products and services | Product: Our Approach | 135 |
| Planet: Supporting a Circular Economy | 113 | |
| Planet: Waste Management and WEEE | 107 | |
| Planet: Packaging | 108 | |
| Product: Product Innovation | 138 | |
| 2.3 Policies and | Planet: Environment Policy | 102 |
| conditions | Planet: Vendor Code of Conduct | 102 |
| Planet: Supplier Sustainability Standards | 105 | |
| Planet: Energy Management | 105 | |
| Code of Ethics | 142 | |
| 2.4 Financial planning | TCFD: Risk Management | 127 |
| 3. Engagement strategy | ||
| 3.1 Engagement | Planet: Supplier Engagement | 105 |
| with value chain | Planet: Building Management | 106 |
| Planet: Transport & Logistics | 107 | |
| Intro & Mapping: Enhancing our Reporting | 77 | |
| Planet: Biodiversity & Our Impact on Nature | 109 | |
| Product: Leveraging AI | 136 | |
| 3.2 Engagement | Intro & Mapping: Collaboration with partners | 77 |
| with industry | Planet: Supporting Growth | 111 |
| Supply Chain Engagement: Responsible Jewellery Council |
136 | |
| 3.3 Engagement with government, public sector and civil society |
Intro & Mapping: Collaboration with Partners | 77 |
| 4. Metrics and targets | ||
| 4.1 Governance, business | Planet: Climate Action | 103 |
| and operational metrics and targets |
TCFD: Risk Metrics Table | 128 |
| 4.2 Financial metrics and targets |
TCFD: Risk Metrics Table | 128 |
| 4.3 GHG emissions | Planet: Climate Action | 103 |
| metrics and targets | Planet: Energy Management | 105 |
| TCFD: Emissions Table | 130 | |
| 4.4 Carbon Credits | No information disclosed. Our offset strategy will be considered as part of longer-term commitments |
N/A |
| 5. Governance | ||
| 5.1 Board oversight | TCFD: Governance of Climate-Related | 119 |
| and reporting | Risks and Opportunities Principal Risk: Climate Change |
153 |
| 5.2 Roles, responsibilities | Intro & Mapping: ESG Governance | 76 |
| and accountability | ||
| 5.3 Culture | Leveraging Our Unique Culture | 80 |
| Planet: Rewarding Positive Behaviours | 104 | |
| 5.4 Incentives and remuneration |
Application of the Remuneration Policy in FY25 | 187 |
| 5.5 Skills, competencies | Planet: Affordable and Clean Energy | 106 |
| and training | Planet: Waste Management | 106 |
| Planet: Colleague Engagement | 104 |

Our Goldsmiths Signature Collection is our first-ever traceable diamond, offering clients total confidence in the journey of their ethically mined diamond. All Goldsmiths Signature diamonds are unearthed from four hand-picked countries, chosen for their outstanding ethical standards. Our clients have peace of mind it was sourced conflict-free and in a sustainable way.
73
Our Values shape our culture and behaviour, driving performance and purposeful action. They are the cornerstone of our Code of Ethics and truly represent who we are.
WE EARN TRUST & CONFIDENCE
By being true to ourselves and honest and transparent with our colleagues, our clients and our brand partners.

By working together to cultivate a secure and supportive workplace, with equal opportunities and respect.

By making the right decisions for the benet of our colleagues, stakeholders and wider society.

By actively engaging in our community and supporting those in need.

By working with our industry and other stakeholders to minimise our impact on the environment.

WE ADVOCATE FOR OUR INDUSTRY
By proactively promoting the interests and responsibilities of the luxury watch and jewellery sectors in our markets.

Our Purpose is an inextricable part of how we do business. Environmental, social and governance factors are considered in our decision-making processes at every level of our business.

OUR ESG PILLARS
while leveraging opportunities to secure a more sustainable future.
Our ESG pillars provide a strategic framework and guiding principles to help streamline our decision-making and ensure everyone across our Group works towards common goals.



We WOW clients with the nest selection of watches and jewellery, together with world-class service.
We provide colleagues with rewarding careers, support a thriving economy and care for our communities through rigorous ESG standards and via The Watches of Switzerland Group Foundation.

We track our progress holistically, across non-nancial and nancial performance.
Progress towards our ESG goals is considered as part of our colleague bonus scheme, reinforcing our commitment to a more sustainable future.
In addition, our existing loan facility is linked to the achievement of our near-term science-based emission reduction targets and circularity goals.

As of June 2025, the Group holds ISS Prime Rating and the top QualityScore of '1' for Environment and Social. As of June 2025, we also hold the top MSCI ESG Rating of AAA.
The MSCI index is widely recognised as the leader for global equity benchmarks. The use by Watches of Switzerland Group PLC of any MSCI ESG Research LLC or its afliates (MSCI) data, and the use of MSCI logos, trademarks, service marks or index names herein, do not constitute a sponsorship, endorsement, recommendation, or promotion of the Watches of Switzerland Group by MSCI. MSCI services and data are the property of MSCI or its information providers, and are provided 'as-is' and without 1 UN Sustainable Development Goals. warranty. MSCI names and logos are trademarks or service marks of MSCI.

This report covers the Watches of Switzerland Group PLC (the 'Group') for the reporting period from 29 April 2024 to 27 April 2025.
It incorporates activities and operations over which the Group has direct control or signicant inuence. This includes all owned and operated showrooms, and service centres in the UK and US, our ofces and regional headquarters and distribution and logistics centres under operational control of the Group.
Performance data and disclosures are reported for all consolidated subsidiaries within the Group's nancial reporting boundary. Environmental data includes Scope 1 and Scope 2 emissions across directly controlled locations, and Scope 3 data includes emissions from supply chain logistics and transportation. Social and governance data includes all directly employed colleagues across our Group operations.
During the reporting period, the Group acquired the exclusive distribution rights for the Roberto Coin brand in the US, Canada, Central America and the Caribbean, through the acquisition of Roberto Coin Inc., an associate company of Roberto Coin S.p.A., based in Italy. It also acquired the Hodinkee business, a global digital content provider and gateway for luxury watch enthusiasts. As a result, the scope of our reporting has grown to include the performance of these newly acquired businesses from the dates of acquisition onward. Historical data from prior periods does not include these businesses unless otherwise specied. Any minor updates or methodological adjustments are noted within the relevant sections of this report.
Guided by our purpose and values to 'do the right thing, always', we operate a responsible and ethical business by aspiring to best practice and understanding stakeholder expectations, then making sure this is reected in our business decisions.
The Board takes a structured and proactive approach to ESG governance, providing strategic direction, reviewing risks and performance and ensuring sustainability and responsible business practices are integrated throughout the organisation.
Our approach is built on three core ESG governance pillars: Board-level oversight supported by our ESG Committee, executive accountability through our ESG Steering Group, and operational integration through dedicated working groups aligned to our strategic pillars of People, Planet and Product.
Senior leaders across the business are responsible for driving ESG priorities and delivering progress against our targets. This is underpinned by cross-functional collaboration, data-led decision-making and regular stakeholder engagement.
Our ESG risk register ensures a systematic approach to ESG risk management, which allows us to formally monitor our risk prole and manage change at the appropriate levels, while mitigating or removing risks to our business operations before they materialise. Our risk management framework also allows us to identify and act on opportunities arising from a changing climate. More information on how we are identifying and managing climate-related risks and opportunities, can be found in our TCFD Statement on pages 114 to 131.
Through this framework, ESG is embedded into our long-term ESG Strategy and day-to-day operations, while meeting regulatory obligations and responding to stakeholder expectations.
The Group is committed to high standards of environmental and social governance and our Board governance structure can be found on page 165.
The Board has overall responsibility for oversight of ESG-related risks and opportunities and is supported by the dedicated ESG Committee, chaired by Baroness (Rosa) Monckton MBE, Non-Executive Director.
Our ESG Committee meets a minimum of three times a year, plus, where appropriate, additional meetings are held dedicated to training and awareness. The Committee plays an active role in the development and delivery of the Group's ESG Strategy by considering best practice, ratifying key decisions, and providing accountability against KPIs in relation to our three ESG Pillars of People, Planet and Product.
The ESG Committee is supported by an ESG Steering Group, which is comprised of members of Senior Management, each with formal operational responsibility for the management of environmental, social and governance issues. The ESG Steering Group is chaired by our CFO, Anders Romberg, and driven by our experienced Head of Sustainability and ESG, Kesah Trowell.
The ESG Steering Group aims to meet once a month and exists primarily to help mitigate risk, and to oversee the development of a progressive ESG Strategy and ensure its successful delivery across the Group.
(ESG Committee)
EXECUTIVE ACCOUNTABILITY (ESG Steering Group and Trading Board)

We conducted a comprehensive materiality assessment in FY24 to identify the ESG topics most relevant to our business and stakeholders, and prioritise our focus on the most signicant actual and potential impacts of our operation.
This process involved engagement with key stakeholder groups, including clients, colleagues, investors, and community representatives. We considered economic, environmental and social dimensions to identify the topics most relevant to our stakeholders and to our long-term value creation. The ndings from our FY24 assessment were published in our Annual Report and Accounts 2024 and continue to inform our strategy, risk management and sustainability reporting.
To ensure the continued relevance of these material topics, we carried out a targeted review in February 2025. This review was prompted by developments including the US elections, emerging legislation and evolving perspectives on natural capital. The review conrmed that the material topics identied in FY24 remain current and aligned with our impact areas and stakeholder concerns.
As no signicant changes in impact or stakeholder priorities were identied, we have maintained the same set of material topics for FY25. We will continue to monitor these areas and conduct a full reassessment if signicant new developments or changes in stakeholder sentiment arise. Our approach to determining the materiality will be reviewed on an annual basis.

| Key: | |
|---|---|
| 1 Packaging |
| 2 Biodiversity & Nature | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3 Social Impact | ||
| 4 | Transparency & Reporting | |
| 5 Traceability of Raw Materials | ||
| 6 Anti-Bribery, Corruption & Fraud | ||
| 7 Anti-Money Laundering | ||
| 8 Health, Safety and Wellbeing | ||
| 9 Achieving GHG Reduction Targets | ||
| 10 Climate Action | ||
| 11 Energy Management | ||
| 12 Sustainable Procurement | |
|---|---|
| 13 Diversity & Inclusion | |
| 14 Whistleblowing & Grievance | |
| Procedures | |
| 15 Colleague Engagement | |
| 16 Training & Education | |
| 17 Supply Chain Engagement | |
| 18 Brand & Reputation | |
| 19 Data Protection & Cyber Security | |
| 20 Circularity via Repairs | |
| & Pre-Owned | |
The Group's business strategy is aligned with the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (UN SDGs) and we support the principles of the UN Global Compact, which aims to prioritise and mobilise efforts to drive business action to achieve these goals by 2030.
We remain members of the UK Government's All-Party Corporate Responsibility Group and the British Retail Consortium, who provide regulatory guidance and represent our sector's interest in policy discussions, most recently the Corporate Net-Zero Standard Version 2.0 public consultation. We also partner with international social enterprise, Slave-Free Alliance, to support the development and delivery of our human rights and modern slavery roadmap.
We strongly encourage all supplier partners to align with relevant, well-recognised sustainability standards and certications, as well as adhere to external initiatives or sets of principles. More information can be found on page 136.
In FY25, we continued to partner with the Association of Creative Independent Watchmakers, to help provide talented watchmakers with a platform, guidance and support, as they hone their skills and shape their careers.
Through our business and The Watches of Switzerland Group Foundation, we enjoy long-standing partnerships with charities including local food banks in the UK and Habitat for Humanity in the US, as well as The King's Trust in both the UK and US. More information on how we care for our local communities through the Foundation can be found on pages 92 to 99.
During FY25, the Group participated in a digital transformation project, led by AI Agent Platform, Sevva AI and supported by Shefeld University, to explore how machine-learning technology can enhance ESG due diligence and reporting. The project was supported by Innovate UK, the UK innovation agency, as part of their work to understand how AI can help businesses in achieving sustainability goals.
The project was a success and resulted in the development of an AI Agent to efciently gather and analyse publicly available data and carry out real-time sustainability assessments, evidenced with direct links to ofcial information sources.
With an increasing number of 'off the shelf' solutions offering generic AI ESG risk assessments, our project evolved to focus on improving supply chain transparency and due diligence relevant to our business and industry needs. It included carrying out detailed supplier entity mapping and categorisation, as well as retrieving supplier information and data to support business decisions.
In April 2025, we agreed to progress with the AI Agent on a commercial basis and are actively using our new platform to monitor the level of supplier alignment with our Supplier Sustainability Standards. See pages 117, 136 and 137 for more information.
The use of AI across our business is underpinned by our new Group AI Policy which was approved by our AI Council in April 2025 and supports the Group's Code of Ethics. This Policy underlines our commitment to the ethical and responsible use of machine learning technologies and provides guidelines and protocols for their use within our organisation.
As part of our commitment to transparency and responsible business practices, we are proud to be reaccredited with the Fair Tax Mark, which demonstrates that we pay the right amount of tax in the right place, at the right time and that we openly communicate our tax affairs. See page 142 for more information.

At the Watches of Switzerland Group, we have created an inclusive culture which gives our colleagues every reason to join and develop long-term careers within our Group. We are delighted to be Great Place to Work-Certified™ in our first year of entry, which demonstrates our continued commitment to our people.

Being a great place to work is created through our relentless focus on our purpose and values. These shape our behaviour and result in high performance teams engaged in purposeful action. They are the cornerstone of our Code of Ethics and truly represent who we are.




Our Great Place to Work-Certied™ status was achieved in the rst year of partnering with the Great Place To Work® organisation. This accolade demonstrates our commitment to create a positive colleague experience and an enjoyable working environment.
Our view is that by living our Values and integrating them into our everyday actions, colleague engagement will remain strong, which in turn delivers strong client experience. We share below the results of the survey and examples of how we have earned trust and condence throughout the year.
| Taking everything into account, I would say this is a great place to work |
67% |
|---|---|
| I would strongly recommend my organisation to friends and family as a great place to work |
63% |
| People here are willing to give extra to get the job done |
65% |
| I feel I make a difference here | 74% |
| I want to work here for a long time | 67% |
| I'm proud to tell others I work here | 80% |
| When I look at what we accomplish, I feel a sense of pride |
77% |
| My work has special meaning: this is not 'just a job' |
65% |

77% INCLUSION SCORE*
Trust is the foundation of our high performance culture. We know that our roles are demanding and that our expectations are high. Our showroom colleagues deserve the best managers and our relentless focus on talent management has improved Group showroom manager capability. The majority of colleagues are proud to work for our Group and feel that they make a difference.
80% COLLEAGUES ARE PROUD TO WORK HERE*

COLLEAGUES FEEL LIKE THEY MAKE A DIFFERENCE*
My team in particular is why it is a great place to work; from the Showroom Manager, the Assistant Managers, Supervisors and the rest of the Sales Consultants."
EXTRACT FROM GREAT PLACE TO WORK® SURVEY

We continue to provide high levels of support and reward to our valued colleagues with a wide range of benets. These are reviewed each year against market trends and balanced with our nancial performance. Our reward strategy covers three elements: nancial, physical and mental wellbeing, and we adapt our tactics accordingly. This year, we increased our maternity pay benets in the US providing greater nancial support to parents. Our compensation plans in the US were thoughtfully reviewed and enhanced to drive greater engagement with our strategic brand partners. In the UK, we added a 'top seller' element to the commission scheme which has secured 100% retention of participants. In FY26, we will bring our progress to life through a new employer brand campaign highlighting our culture of collaboration, listening and support.

81

Our Employee Resource Groups have gone from strength to strength this year, supporting colleagues with interest and passion in the following areas:

Each group is sponsored by a member of the Senior Leadership Team and meets every quarter to discuss suggestions, ideas and progress. Our progress this year can be measured by:
Respect starts with understanding, and this year, we introduced a new virtual discussion format called 'In Conversation With' which is hosted by Senior Management periodically. This enables colleagues in both regions to discuss the 'real' topics in the business, such as hidden disability, cultural awareness and cyber crime. Topics are suggested by colleagues and attendance remains high.
COLLEAGUE GENDER STATISTICS AS AT 27 APRIL 2025

1 Executive Management is dened on page 173 of the Corporate Governance Statement.
Our Diversity & Inclusion Strategy is underpinned by four pillars. Having made great progress on care, respect and equip, we have been delighted with the outcome of harnessing the power of our brands and communities this year. This is something we feel our Group is uniquely able to drive because of our scale, brand relationships, committed colleagues and The Watches of Switzerland Group Foundation. Some examples of how we have brought this to life are below:


Our LGBTQ+ group made a suggestion this year to leverage Pride month with a focus on gender neutral jewellery. Listening to this suggestion, we worked with the LGBTQ+ Employee Resource Group and designed a campaign which was activated in June 2025 in selected showrooms. This will coincide with Pride month and the increased trend of gender neutral jewellery. Bringing together the power of our product, our community and our colleagues has been a great example of our positive culture and doing the right thing.

A great place to work is underpinned by great teams. We build great teams by combining the right structures with the right people. Each year, we review our organisation and where relevant, we adapt and evolve our structures. We relentlessly focus on retail, ensuring the teams are empowered through strong leadership and training. Our colleagues in our Support Centres focus on prioritising retail, and we have built further capability in the following areas: – Hiring strong leadership in Retail to support the UK retail transformation
In May 2024, the Group acquired Roberto Coin Inc. which strengthened our position in the luxury branded jewellery market, particularly in the US. Preserving the strong people-driven culture has been a priority to ensure success. This has been achieved through retention of key talent, and ongoing communication with the objective of maintaining the culture and heritage that has contributed to the success of the brand since 1996.
With the acquisition of the Hodinkee business in October 2024, we diversied our US talent pool further with experienced editors and journalists from around the world joining our Group. Retention following acquisition has been a priority. Measures such as compensation reviews, benets enhancements and crossfunctional collaboration with current Group resources continue to be a priority for the future.
These acquisitions mean that our skills base is broader than ever. Integrating new colleagues has been a priority to ensure we preserve positive culture whilst providing security and support of our scale and global business. Senior Leadership has spent signicant time with the Leadership in New York. Excitement about the acquisition has been built across the Group through a series of training events, town halls and immersion events, all of which have highlighted their talents, expertise and contributions supporting our position and future growth in the US luxury market.
The launch of CONNECT – our new intranet and social connection platform – has provided us with a strong tasking framework that helps us manage workows and operational processes."
This year, we have developed communication expertise to boost our internal and external communications strategy in order to share and celebrate the great work our colleagues deliver. This also ensures key messages penetrate through the business and drives engagement and high performance.
Our approach to two-way communication is set out below:
As we review our organisation for the long-term, we have had to make some difcult choices in closing a number of UK retail showrooms and making redundancies in our Support Centres in both regions. Where we entered into redundancy conversations, we have made every effort to retrain and redeploy colleagues, with 36% of our UK retail colleagues being retained post consultation.
We are committed to maintaining safety standards that comply with legislation and enable colleagues to be condent that their workplace is safe. Our Health & Safety Policy applies to all business activities and premises to ensure the health, safety and welfare of our colleagues, clients and visitors. A Health & Safety Committee comprising senior leaders from our UK and US operations meets regularly and a rolling review and audit programme is in place. A formal mechanism for reporting accidents is in place and we work closely with a third-party provider.

The Watches of Switzerland Group Foundation works with a number of charity partners in the US and UK. We have leveraged these connections and our colleagues have found a passion for volunteering, which has exceeded our expectations in the last 12 months. Most volunteering is at food banks where colleagues work together to prepare and hand out food parcels for those in need. In addition, our colleagues have also volunteered with The King's Trust and Crisis in the UK and in the US, The King's Trust and Habitat for Humanity where colleagues built homes to support affordable housing initiatives and make a meaningful impact in our local community. The volunteering teams are often cross-functional and the sessions can range from regular weekly support to a half or full day, depending on the charity's need. We have a Volunteering Policy which provides guidance for how the arrangements work. By living our Values, we have delivered 1,133 volunteering hours across the Group which is an increase of 37%.
We will continue to use Great Place To Work ® as our future benchmark for people, culture and engagement and have agreed four key areas of focus:

Our talent is diverse. We offer a wide range of careers spanning from retail showroom roles to technical roles in our workshops. Our skills are broader than ever following the acquisitions of Roberto Coin Inc. and the Hodinkee business, yet, wherever our colleagues are based, they are all passionate about the products and services we offer.

Building on the success of the UK training programmes in FY24, we have introduced a new talent selection and retention programme in the US which will be delivered through a series of in-person workshops available to all members of leadership. These workshops are designed to develop and challenge our colleagues by providing them with skills and tools to source, interview and on-board new talent. Additionally, strategies will be shared and implemented that will result in the retention of our colleagues through more effective communication, motivation and recognition of our teams.
In the UK, we have delivered the introduction of a new competency framework and related interview questions and toolkits for UK retail, which has supported our commitment recruiting the best talent in our showrooms.
| 38% | UK VACANCIES FILLED THROUGH INTERNAL TALENT |
|---|---|
| 56% | ROLEX OLD BOND STREET COLLEAGUES WERE INTERNAL HIRES WITH A COMBINED COMPANY TENURE OF 254 YEARS |
| 11,000 | GROUP HOURS OF BRAND AND PRODUCT TRAINING |
| 36% | IN THE UK INTERNAL MOVES AND PROMOTIONS IN RETAIL HAVE INCREASED BY 25% FROM 11% TO 36% |
| 2x | TALENT AND SUCCESSION REVIEWS TAKE PLACE TWICE ANNUALLY IN THE UK AND US |
| 77% | RETAIL PERSONAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN COMPLIANCE IN THE UK |
| 69 | GROUP WATCHMAKERS |
| 79 | COLLEAGUES ACQUIRED THROUGH US ACQUISITIONS |
Our focus in Retail has been making career paths clearer and more accessible for colleagues by harmonising job titles across our brands, creating visibility of 'larger' roles with more scope and underpinning this through transparent pay ranges.
We have created career pathways for both sales and management careers, encouraging cross-brand moves to promote more opportunities.
Following on from the success we have seen in our retail teams, we have introduced new competency-based interviews to our UK Support Centre to help build meaningful development plans for colleagues.
In order to bring our career work to life across the Group, we have created 'Brilliant Careers' which shares colleagues' career experiences, progression and their personal achievements. We deliberately highlight the diversity of opportunities, people and experiences to inspire as many people as possible to continue to develop their career with us.
We have refreshed our external careers website across the Group and our internal vacancies noticeboard, making opportunities more visible, offering hints, tips and support for internal applicants, including those who want to stay with the Group but are relocating to a new city.
Our leadership teams have been instrumental in actively managing talent, through talent forums and discussions and supporting people to apply for roles. In FY25, we lled 38% of vacancies through internal talent moves in the UK and 23% in the US.
Looking ahead, we are focused on building clear and inspiring career pathways. From our in-house leadership programmes at all levels to the roll-out of our successful internal leadership programmes to our support functions, we're investing in every stage of the journey. Our soon-to-launch new competency framework will bring greater clarity to performance conversations, setting a consistent foundation for progression and growth throughout the organisation.
From an early careers perspective, we're focused on intentionally investing in the next generation of talent and shaping the future of our business. This includes partnerships with the local universities and colleges. In the UK, we welcomed students in Buying and Merchandising and collaborated with the Goldsmiths' Centre by offering work placements at our jewellery workshop.
In September 2024, we recruited a UK Apprenticeship and Early Careers Specialist to drive a more strategic approach and align our initiatives with the long-term goals of the business. As a result, we expanded our UK apprenticeship programme from two participants last nancial year to 21 colleagues currently enrolled this year, underscoring our dedication to nurturing talent from within. We now run four distinct apprenticeship programmes in retail and four core support functions – Property, Finance, and Learning & Development – ensuring that we build capability across all business areas for the future. This leadership programme, delivered in partnership with the Fashion Retail Academy (FRA), is a blend of hands-on learning and formal training, designed to equip colleagues with the skills, knowledge and condence to thrive in their careers. This is a Level 4 apprenticeship standard, equivalent to a rst-year undergraduate degree, or a Higher National Certicate (HNC).
In the US, we continue to expand our team of highly skilled and accredited watchmakers; a rare and in-demand trade. We support this through our US Watchmaker Apprenticeship Programme. Three US students participated in this accelerated watchmaking training in partnership with the Lititz Watch Technicum under the Swiss American Watchmakers Training Alliance (SAWTA) certication programme, and six US colleagues are currently participating in the programme.
This year we have continued our focus on excellence in learning and development to ensure our managers and colleagues are provided with the technical and leadership skills and knowledge to provide the world-class experience our clients look for.
We have continued to build on our induction programmes introducing structured subject matter expert packs in both the UK and US. These practical training guides complement the digital learning and ensure consistency and expertise for all new colleagues joining our retail teams. For our colleagues in support we have introduced in-person induction days bringing to life the elements of our culture, high performance teams and Xenia. All new colleagues joining our corporate ofces are invited to attend.
We have maintained our engagement with our global learning system. Since the launch of the new platform in February 2024, global engagement has remained high with over 1,700 colleagues completing learning each month outside of peak trading.
To maintain our position of providing exceptional service, all of our retail colleagues attend a two-day Xenia training programme which we deliver in locations across the UK, exploring Xenia client experience and bringing to life the client journey in our showrooms. Over 400 colleagues attended in FY25, our total number of colleagues now trained is over 1,500.
In the US, we continue our commitment to leadership development by conducting a ve-day management induction programme, engaging 33 colleagues in comprehensive leadership, and organisational training.
This year, we conducted a skills gap analysis with our multi-brand showrooms to conrm levels of condence across key watch and jewellery brands including brand knowledge, product expertise and selling ability. This has enabled us to further focus on gaps in our teams' knowledge and highlights the levels of training by showroom.
Working with our brand partners we provided over 11,000 training hours across 30 brands.
To further elevate our product and brand partnership we have appointed a dedicated Brand & Product Training UK manager to strengthen the levels of expertise on our showrooms further.
Over the past year, the Watches of Switzerland Group has stepped into a new era of talent development, cultivating a leadership culture that reects both the prestige of our brand and the potential of our people. At the heart of this transformation are our Senior Leadership Programmes, which in the UK welcomed 24 delegates and achieved a 100% satisfaction score – a testament to the calibre of our content and the commitment of our people. Alongside it, our Core Leadership Programme empowered 29 rising leaders, providing them with the tools and insights to lead with clarity, empathy and commercial impact. Our commitment to inclusive leadership continues to strengthen, with dedicated investment in external programmes for Ethnic Future Leaders, Ethnic Senior Leaders and Women in Leadership. These initiatives are not only expanding representation, they are shaping future-ready leaders across our business.
Our everyday leadership training across the Group provides a clear and practical set of management principles designed to anchor management behaviours across our retail teams. It's a new standard for what practical leadership looks like every day: consistent, supportive and purpose-led. We continue to nurture leaders who represent both the heritage and the future of luxury retail.
In addition, this year marked the successful launch of our US Situational Leadership Programme, designed to equip leaders with the skills to adapt their management style to meet the evolving needs of their teams, enhance collaboration and drive performance in a dynamic work environment.


The Rolex Old Bond Street team on their induction day
Our focus on Xenia, our bespoke Client Experience Programme, reached a new level this year combined with our largest Rolex boutique. This launch was underpinned by an industry-leading training programme designed to deliver a world-class client experience that immerses clients in the world of Rolex. This ambitious foundation collaborated with the world-leading expertise of The AHA Group who we worked with in 2021 to design our bespoke Xenia programme. Developed in collaboration with Rolex and experts from across the Group, this comprehensive programme covered an exceptional breadth of topics – from luxury client behaviours and technical Rolex knowledge to advanced sales techniques, leadership, after-sales service and hosting with grace. Training took place across a variety of locations, starting in the Shard, London, stopping in Geneva, and then culminating in two days of intensive practice in the boutique itself. Across a total of 5,300 training hours, this programme created a highly knowledgeable, condent team who can deliver experiences that are as precise and exceptional as the watches themselves.
We are dedicated to client experience and create focus, reect on insights and take appropriate action to ensure we continue to deliver high standards across the Group. We hold regular Client Experience Insights Meetings which are designed to enhance the overall customer journey within our showrooms and boutiques. By facilitating the exchange of best practices among retail leadership, these meetings provide a platform for identifying innovative strategies, addressing challenges and celebrating outstanding achievements.
As part of our efforts to recognise excellence, the US introduced the '100 Club' initiative, which honours individuals and teams who consistently deliver exceptional client experiences, achieving our benchmark of 100% satisfaction. In FY25, 331 colleagues were celebrated through this recognition programme, highlighting their dedication and impact in elevating the client experience.
Developed in collaboration with Rolex and experts from across the Watches of Switzerland Group, the comprehensive programme covered an exceptional breadth of topics – from luxury client behaviours and technical Rolex knowledge to advanced sales techniques, leadership, after-sales service and hosting with grace."

This year, we have taken further steps to measure the effectiveness of our brand and product training. In the UK we conducted a skills gap analysis with our multi-brand showrooms to conrm levels of condence across key watch and jewellery brands including brand knowledge, product expertise and selling ability. This has enabled us to further focus on gaps in our teams' knowledge, highlight the levels of training required on a showroom-by-showroom basis, and target our actions more effectively.
We conducted a review of our in-house watchmaker training programme and have introduced a modular based training programme providing a structured learning programme with the exibility to be assessed and start at different joining points depending on prior experience.
We conducted a review of our in-house watchmaker training programme and have introduced a modular based training programme providing a structured learning programme."


In the US, Roberto Coin Inc. has given us the opportunity to strengthen our position in the luxury branded jewellery market. Colleagues working at Roberto Coin Inc. undertake a comprehensive induction, onboarding and education programme which delivers an overview of this prestigious brand. In addition, we have delivered 232 hours of Roberto Coin brand and product training to our retail colleagues across the US.
As part of our continued investment in colleague development and client experience, we introduced a new Jewellery Essentials training programme to the colleague journey. This specialised training was designed to deepen product knowledge, enhance presentation skills and empower teams to create memorable moments centred around jewellery.
In addition, we launched the Creating Moments with Jewellery programme focused on elevating the in-showroom experience through rened jewellery presentation techniques and the creation of impactful jewellery-focused events. By equipping colleagues with the skills to condently communicate the craftsmanship, design and storytelling behind each piece, we aim to strengthen client engagement and drive a deeper emotional connection with our collections.
In the UK, we have continued to focus on jewellery training in preparation for the opening of the Mappin & Webb Luxury Jewellery boutique in Manchester in FY26 and delivered 495 hours of brand and product training to showrooms. We continue to offer our colleagues the opportunity to elevate their gemological expertise through the GIA Applied Jewelry Professional (AJP) programme.
In FY25, a total of 782 training hours were dedicated to the GIA, reinforcing our commitment to excellence in service and expertise in ne jewellery. This globally recognised diploma supports our commitment to deepening product knowledge and building condence in delivering an exceptional client experience. In FY25, 15 colleagues proudly graduated from the programme, with an additional 60 currently enrolled, reecting strong engagement and enthusiasm for continued professional development within our teams.
92
Lorrie Nelson, Regional Director Watches of Switzerland Group volunteering at Habitat for Humanity

The Foundation brings most of the Group's charitable activities under one umbrella. So far, the Watches of Switzerland Group has committed a total of £8.3 million in donations to support three pillars: the prevention or relief of poverty; the advancement of education; and the relief of those in need by reason of youth, age, ill-health, disability, nancial hardship or other disadvantage.
The Foundation has donated a total of £5.5 million to charity partners to date, including a total of £986,646 UK and \$591,500 donated in FY25.
The UK Foundation has a board of Trustees who bring drive and stewardship, including model and fashion expert David Gandy, BAFTA-nominated actor John Hannah, radio presenter Johnathan Joseph (also known as DJ Spoony) and sports, brands and diversity expert Terence Parris. They are joined on the board of Trustees by our Group CEO, Brian Duffy who acts as the Chair and Ruth Benford, Executive Director, Marketing.
| FY25 | To date | |
|---|---|---|
| Amount committed from Group to Foundation | £0.8m | £8.3m |
| Donations from Foundation to charity | £1.3m | £5.5m |
| Number of people helped | 36,345 | 205,071 |
| Volunteering hours | 1,133 | 2,697 |
| Other Group donations (including payroll giving and employer matching) |
£18,987 | £374,418 |

The Trustees meet at least quarterly and have committed to an engagement calendar with our strategic partners for FY25 which has included inspirational sessions and judging panels.

Brian Duy Watches of Switzerland Group CEO, Chair of the Foundation

Ruth Benford Watches of Switzerland Group Executive Director of Marketing

David Gandy Model and fashion expert

John Hannah BAFTA-nominated actor

Terence Parris Sports, brands and diversity expert

Johnathan Joseph (also known as DJ Spoony) DJ and radio presenter

Donation: £310,000 donated UK \$315,000 donated US
Impact: 10,000 young people helped through combined programmes
The partnership between The King's Trust, the Watches of Switzerland Group and the Foundation reached a new level this year following a number of initiatives and events.
In August this year, the Foundation Trustees attended The King's Trust head ofce and led a session for young people to inspire them into work. This involved inspirational talks from Trustees and interactive sessions to build skills and condence in young people.
The Group hosted a world of work day in the London head ofce. This involved hosting and inspiring young people from The King's Trust who have an interest in retail, luxury and jewellery. The young people met functional experts, toured our showrooms and also spent time with Mark Appleby, Director of Jewellery Services for Mappin & Webb, who also holds the role of the Crown Jeweller.
Colleagues participated in Future Steps in February 2025 which committed those signing up to stepping 10,000 steps per day for the month of February. 405 colleagues signed up across the UK and the US and a total of £52,000 was raised. Our colleagues walked 40,659 miles which is approximately 1.6 times around the Earth. In addition, it was the rst time a partner working with The King's Trust had been able to participate globally.
The Watches of Switzerland Group is proud to be headline sponsors of this campaign, which raises vital funds to give young women a working future through training courses with potential employers, access to job opportunities and skills to start a business.
The campaign was supported by Group colleagues in the UK and the US and featured a series of Brilliant Breakfast events which provided us with an opportunity to talk about diversity and inclusion initiatives and in particular, how we support women who are often the most disenfranchised in society, The funds raised by The King's Trust are used to support programmes through which young women are supported into employment. With this group often having childcare or other caring responsibilities, the help can be covering the cost of childcare or covering transport costs before the women get their rst payslip.
On 6 March 2025, the Watches of Switzerland Group supported the campaign with nationwide Brilliant Breakfast fundraising events. The Group hosted bespoke events across our Goldsmiths, Mappin & Webb, Watches of Switzerland and Mayors showrooms to support the campaign, bringing together celebrity ambassadors, inuencers and clients to raise vital funds for The King's Trust.
In UK and US showrooms and Support Centres, these Brilliant Breakfasts created energy and fun across the organisation and focused our colleagues on how to create a sense of inclusion and belonging in teams.


Change A Girl's Life



Enterprise Challenge Finals
As part of the Change a Girl's Life campaign and also throughout the month of March, we partnered with two of our female-led jewellery brands – Pasquale Bruni and Kiki McDonough – who donated 5% of all sales in the UK to support the campaign. Goldsmiths and Mappin & Webb also donated 5% of their sales from our beautiful oral inspired jewellery collections during March 2025, meaning our clients helped to Change a Girl's Life.
The Foundation has sponsored the Enterprise Challenge initiatives for the third year in both the US and the UK. These education programmes are transformative, improve social mobility and create opportunities for young people to develop fundamental, foundational life skills and learn about the future world of work. The programmes are aimed at 11-16 year olds who might not thrive through the traditional curriculum. Enterprise challenge is an inter school competition designed to ignite the spirit of entrepreneurship, develop condence and build aspiration. The challenge broadens young people's horizons at a key moment in their lives and has a transformational impact on their long-term prospects.
The challenge provides the Group and the Foundation trustees with opportunities to judge and give inspirational talks at regional nals. This year, our Trustees also recorded impactful and educational video content for young people to learn from.
For the rst time in the Enterprise Challenge's history, we linked together the nalists from Leeds, UK and the Bronx, New York City for an interactive session in which they learned about each other, attended by Brian Duffy, CEO Watches of Switzerland Group and Chair of the Foundation.
Foundation Trustees participating in The King's Trust Time to Inspire Event
| Trussell Trust | Birmingham Central Food Bank |
|---|---|
| Leicester South Food Bank | Liverpool St Andrew's Community Network Food Bank |
| Glasgow SE Food Bank | Bristol InHope Food Bank |
| Euston Food Bank | Edinburgh North West Food Bank |
| Manchester Central Food Bank | Kingston Food Bank |
| Newcastle West End Food Bank | |
| Donation to | £328,000 | Impact: | 36,345 people |
|---|---|---|---|
| UK food banks |
£1.5m to date | 839 hours volunteered |
The Trussell Trust is the umbrella organisation for its food bank partners. The Foundation's donation of £58,000 to date enabled the Trussell Trust to fund their Hardship Helpline which provides support to people in nancial hardship. Over 1,316 calls were handled this year with 331 people supported realising over £230,000 in nancial gains.
The Foundation has partnered with the Leicester South Food Bank since 2021, continuing the relationship previously held with the Group, and has donated £210,000 to date. Historically, the Foundation has been a signicant partner enabling the food bank to open its regional distribution centre which provides food to a regional network of food banks. This year, we donated £30,000 to support the opening of the Leicester South Food Bank Community Hub based in Wigston, Leicester which is designed to be a vibrant community space to provide accessible local services and advice. Across all food banks, colleague volunteering has increased this year as our colleagues have packed food parcels and also provided practical skills and advice (such as IT and policy) through our newly formed functional support teams.
The Foundation donated an additional £50,000 this year to the Newcastle Food Bank bringing the total since FY22 to £300,000. This donation has enabled the food bank to replace the roof, doubling its warehouse capacity for storage.
Newcastle Food Bank wishes to thank The Watches of Switzerland Group Foundation for their wonderful donation and help. Please come visit us to see how the Foundation's support is beneting people and communities in Newcastle."
JOHN MCCORY, CEO NEWCASTLE FOOD BANK



| Donation: | £165,000 donated |
|---|---|
| £590,000 donated to date | |
| Impact: | Ten people directly supported in FY25 |
| and indirectly many more | |
| 274 supported to date | |
Crisis is a national UK charity for people experiencing homelessness. Our partnership with Crisis started in 2021 and we continue to focus on the recruitment of clinical psychologists with the aim of ending homelessness and increasing social mobility. The psychologists provide intensive one-to-one specialist support to members covering a range of mental health issues. In addition, over the past three years, we have supported Crisis at Christmas, providing homeless guests with somewhere safe to stay over the festive period.
David Gandy, Trustee of The Foundation, donated clothes to the pop-up shop on Saville Row in London again this year and the generous donations from our Group and others raised over £141,000 for the charity.

Donation: £50,000 donated in FY25 £550,000 to date
Impact: 884 people (512 adults, 372 children)
The Fuel Bank Foundation was created to help people in fuel crisis by providing people with nancial support and practical advice to get them back on their feet. The Foundation started its strategic partnership with the Fuel Bank Foundation in 2022 and this year, donated an additional £50,000 to alleviate the impact of the cost of heating.
The Foundation's total contribution to the Fuel Bank over the past ve years totals £550,000 and we have together helped over 27,000 people living in fuel crisis in England and Scotland. The support offered is emergency fuel top-ups and energy advice. In addition, this year our donation also provided 200 heated throws to people living in fuel poverty to keep warm during the colder months.
The Fuel Bank works with over 800 community-based organisations (including many of the food banks that The Watches of Switzerland Group Foundation partners with) who assess people's needs and refer them to the Fuel Bank if they face living in fuel crisis.
As a result of the support from the Foundation, these households have been provided with about ten days' energy, giving them security and time to address issues within their control that are propelling them into fuel crisis. The Fuel Bank then provides hands-on advice and support to implement practical solutions for each household.



Donation: \$176,500 in FY25 Impact: 323,500 meals provided
\$353,000 to date
30,000+ people helped to date
Feeding South Florida is a member of the Feeding America nationwide network of food banks. Feeding South Florida supports 25% of the food insecure population in South Florida and the Foundation has partnered with this charity since 2022.
The Foundation's donations since 2022 have created a huge impact in the local community by providing emergency food assistance and advice, training and support. More specically, over 310,000 meals have been provided to local people who are experiencing food insecurity as a result of the Foundation's donation. In addition, the School Pantry Program in North Dade High School has beneted 4,500 students and families by providing 13,500 meals through school pantry, ensuring children have access to after-school meals.
Feeding South Florida is committed to breaking the cycle of hunger and poverty by increasing household stability and economic self-sufciency through workforce training and job placement programmes. These programmes include culinary, driver and warehouse training which give hands-on practical experience over ve to 12-week programmes. The funding from the Foundation has supported 22 graduates through culinary training, 87% of whom are in full time employment with benets.
Our Foundation regularly brings UK and US food banks together to learn from each other and Feeding South Florida shares its innovative approach through its access to national food donor partnerships, landmark research and innovative technology and leading local food distribution and programmatic efforts.


We are deeply grateful to The Watches of Switzerland Group Foundation. This partnership is about more than generosity – it is about belief."
BARONESS (ROSA) MONCKTON MBE FOUNDER AND CHAIR TEAM DOMENICA

Donation: \$294,000 donated to date Impact: Hurricane recovery for
48 homes
Habitat for Humanity works together with families, local communities, volunteers and partners from around the world so that more people are able to live in affordable and safe homes. The Foundation's donations to date total \$294,000 and have supported new build projects for families across New York, Atlanta and Westchester. This charity partner provides Watches of Switzerland colleagues with enriching volunteering options as colleagues help to build homes for people in need.
Habitat for Humanity responded promptly to hurricanes Helene and Milton this year as out of their 150 afliate buildings, 48 suffered damage and needed recovery support. Following a request, the Foundation Trustees agreed to re-direct funds from the Foundation's previous donation to Habitat for Humanity to support repair and rebuild initiatives.

Donation: £50,000 donated in FY25 to support moving to a new facility

TEAM DOMENICA
This year, we started a new partnership with Team Domenica, a charity that exists to support disabled people into employment. The charity reports that just 4.7% of people with learning disabilities in England are in employment. In addition, people with learning disabilities are much more likely to suffer from isolation and mental health issues.
The Founder and Chair of the charity is Baroness (Rosa) Monckton MBE, a Non-Executive Director of the Company, who set up the charity having witnessed rst-hand the challenges her daughter Domenica has faced as a disabled person.

Donation: \$50,000
Impact: 21,000 cups of coffee 39,000 transactions
Cafe Joyeux opened its rst cafe in New York in 2024. The mission of Cafe Joyeux is to change the lives for people with intellectual and developmental disabilities through education, training and meaningful employment. Our donation of \$50,000 this year has supported a vocational training programme for new cafe employees, boosting their skills and condence through education and employment.
We proudly serve Cafe Joyeux coffee at our Sunrise Corporate ofce, supporting their mission and turning every cup into an opportunity to promote inclusion, dignity and meaningful employment for individuals with intellectual and developmental disabilities.


Above: Team Domenica Above left: Habitat for Humanity Left: Cafe Joyeux


We strive to operate to the highest levels of environmental stewardship, while safeguarding against climate-related risk and supporting a more circular economy, through our after-sales and servicing and pre-owned businesses.
In FY25, we set out to understand our decarbonisation levers with the aim of modelling a net-zero target that is grounded in science and embedded within our business strategy, ensuring accountability, transparency and measurable progress towards a more sustainable future.

The Group operates high levels of environmental stewardship, while safeguarding against climate-related risk and supporting a more circular economy through our repairs and pre-owned businesses.

We are taking ownership of our responsibility to minimise our environmental impact, build climate resilience and preserve natural resources. Through collaboration across our industry and with key stakeholders, we aim to promote sustainability at every stage of our operations and value chain.
There were no legal proceedings or nancial losses associated with environmental regulations in FY25.
Our business and supply chain have the potential to negatively impact our planet through the mining of metals and gemstones, the production and retailing of products, energy use, transportation, water and waste.
We strive to minimise these impacts and improve our overall environmental performance through ongoing stakeholder engagement, innovation and technological advancement, supported by initiatives to build climate change resilience and protect nature and biodiversity.
Our Environment Policy sets out our commitment to the continual improvement of the management and operation of our activities to minimise any adverse effects on the environment and public health.
This Policy applies to all Group operations worldwide and every colleague and contractor we employ. It refers to compliance with relevant environmental laws and regulations, ensuring environmental awareness and training, transparent dealings, the conservation of resources, sustainable procurement, and the mitigation and management of environmental and climate-related risks.
Our Vendor Code of Conduct includes our requirements in relation to environmental management and the prevention, mitigation and control of serious environmental and health impacts resulting from our supplier partners' operations, including, but not limited to, raw materials, energy and greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, water, waste, chemical and hazardous substance use, air quality, and nature and biodiversity.
It is supported by comprehensive Supplier Sustainability Standards, designed to engage brand partners and other suppliers with the achievement of environmental goals, including our requirement for sharing primary datasets.
The Group is committed to building climate resilience and achieving net-zero GHG emissions by 2050. We are taking prioritised action to reduce our emissions in line with what the latest climate science says is necessary to meet the goals of the Paris Agreement and pursue efforts to limit warming to 1.5°C. Our near-term emission targets have been veried by the Science Based Targets initiative (SBTi), which is a global body and collaboration between CDP, the UN Global Compact, World Resources Institute (WRI) and the Worldwide Fund for Nature (WWF).
In FY26, the Group will set long-term emission reduction targets and apply to the SBTi for verication. We will also resubmit near-term targets that are aligned with market factors.
| Public commitments | Near-term SBTs aligned to 1.5°C under Paris Climate Agreement |
|||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Scope 1 and 2 | 50% reduction in absolute emissions by 2030 from a FY20 base year |
2050 | ||||
| Scope 3 | 42% reduction in absolute emissions by 2030 from a FY20 base year |
2050 |
Overall, in FY25, our total gross location-based GHG emissions increased from 253,368 tCO2 e to 281,211 tCO2 e. While we are disappointed to see an 11% increase year-on-year, it is the result of our commitment to 'do the right thing' and improve the accuracy of our reporting.
To calculate parts of our Scope 3 emissions, we used a hybrid approach which involved using the most up-to-date spend-based emissions factors, combined with the most accurate and reliable primary data available, including veried Scope 1 and 2 data from our largest suppliers.
Although we are transitioning away from spend-based calculations, the use of spend-based data tends to overestimate emissions, as the emission factors related to spend are closely connected to the carbon impact of the overall economy.
Despite this increase, we remain committed to improving our reporting and reducing absolute emissions in line with expectations. At the time of this report, the Group is in the process of reapplying to the SBTi, proposing a new marketbased near-term target, along with a new long-term target to reduce absolute Scope 1, 2 and 3 emissions by 90% by 2050 from a FY20 baseline. The Group will aim to offset the residual 10% of emissions through permanent removal and storage of carbon to achieve net-zero emissions. Setting our net-zero target will realign our growing business with a 1.5°C trajectory and be supported by our climate transition plan.
We are pleased to report an 86% reduction in our total gross market-based Scope 1 and 2 emissions, following our transition to 100% renewable energy across our Group, backed by guarantees of origin. In FY26, we look forward to achieving more reductions following recent investment in a new energy management system, as well as other initiatives reported on pages 105 and 106.
The Group reports an 11% increase in Scope 3 emissions year-on-year from 249,054 tCO2 e to 276,850 tCO2 e.
A recent 19% increase in spend-based emission factors for watches has negatively impacted our Category 1 emissions, resulting in a small number of watch brands accounting for 62% of our total Scope 3 emissions. Some of our largest suppliers now report veried emissions data, and we have included this information in our calculations where available. As more key brands continue to evolve their emissions accounting and reporting, we look forward to reecting their progress in future.
Further engagement with suppliers through our procurement and supply chain management functions is a key focus for us in FY26, as well as advocating for the reporting of veried, Scope 1 and 2 emissions data through public platforms, such as CDP or company websites.
We were pleased to see an 87% drop in end-of-life treatment emissions following our efforts to reduce own brand packaging, as well as a reduction in business travel journeys, resulting in a 30% decrease in business travel emissions year-on-year.
The table on page 130 provides a detailed breakdown of our Scope 1, 2 and 3 greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions by activity, calculated with reference to the GHG Protocol.
As part of our commitment to responsible growth and climate resilience, during FY25, we undertook a focused stakeholder engagement exercise to inform our transition planning. It involved a series of meetings with key internal stakeholders and was facilitated by third-party experts, to understand colleague expectations around responsible sourcing, emissions reduction and future sustainability.
The resulting insights are shaping our approach to decarbonisation across our showroom operations and supply chain, and helping to ensure our strategy aligns with the evolving demands of a low-carbon, high-integrity luxury retail sector.
This consultation exercise underlined our need for a dened emissions reduction plan and highlighted the risks associated with our limited ability to fully inuence material changes in emissions reduction in relation to location-based energy sources and purchased goods and services.
Mitigations include switching to market-based emissions targets to achieve our 2030 target through renewable energy purchases, continuing to strengthen engagement with brand partners and other suppliers to improve our primary dataset, and further advocating for emissions reduction and reporting throughout our value chain.
We underlined our commitment to building climate resilience, improving climate literacy and embedding sustainability into core decision-making in August 2024, when senior leaders across strategy, operations, nance and governance took part in a Climate Fresk Workshop. The session, which aimed to help drive informed, sustainable decisionmaking at the highest level, was hosted by an expert external facilitator and attended by the Chair of our ESG Committee, Baroness (Rosa) Monckton MBE, who champions the Group's ESG strategy at Board level.

Watches of Switzerland Group colleagues participating in a Climate Fresk Workshop
Our GreenVibE incentive rewards positive behaviours in support of caring for our planet. It operates through our award-winning recognition platform, VibE, and is promoted Group-wide via our interactive colleague engagement platform, CONNECT.
Colleagues are encouraged to suggest ideas to help improve our environmental performance or share 'green deeds', performed by themselves or other team members. The best ideas and deeds are communicated to our wider business and the winning colleague or colleagues are rewarded with points that can be redeemed for retail or experience vouchers.
This initiative continues to be a successful way of engaging colleagues with complex climate goals and empowering them to help make a tangible difference, whatever their role and sphere of inuence.
How well we manage climate-related issues and perform against our environmental targets is considered by the Remuneration Committee when reviewing annual bonuses.

Above left: During the year, colleagues were rewarded for initiating a number of eco-friendly ideas, including a collaboration with a packaging partner to improve the recyclability of our own brand packaging. For more information, see page 108.
Above right: Local litter picking group, the Leicestershire Litter Wombles, were invited to our Leicester Support Centre to engage colleagues with the environmental consequences of littering. Their talk about how to care for communities by keeping them clean was followed by a litter pick.

Engagement with brand partners and other suppliers is key to achieving our environmental goals, as well as addressing areas of public concern, such as protecting nature and biodiversity and guaranteeing the provenance of raw materials.
Understanding the environmental impact of the products we sell and services we use is a growing area of focus, and this is reected in a FY25 update to our Vendor Code of Conduct requiring suppliers to communicate data on key environmental indicators.
All suppliers receive a link to our Supplier Sustainability Standards, which support our Vendor Code of Conduct and set out our environmental goals, along with the actions needed throughout our value chain to achieve them. These Standards support engagement across a number of priorities, including sustainable sourcing, energy efciency, transport and logistics, circularity, product information, biodiversity and nature, packaging, and marketing and events.
As part of our environmental assessment approach, we collect environmental data from key suppliers and actively seek opportunities for collaborative working to achieve shared goals. We are committed to continuous improvement in supply chain engagement and in FY26 will increase the number of suppliers subject to sustainability risk assessments and participate in industry working groups and multi-stakeholder initiatives to promote sector-wide responsible sourcing practices.
We strive to use energy in an efcient, cost effective and responsible way throughout our estate and comply with all relevant local and international environmental laws and regulations.
Shortly after the end of our nancial year, our ESG Committee approved a new Group Energy Policy to help formalise and align our efforts with ISO 50001 international energy management certication standards. This Policy outlines our guidelines and procedures for reducing energy consumption, improving efciency and minimising our environmental impact.
Our energy management system includes improving how we collect and use data, as well as implementing energy efcient technologies such as LED lighting and motion sensors to reduce energy waste. We invest in high-quality Heating, Ventilation and Air Conditioning (HVAC) systems, which are regularly serviced in line with manufacturers' guidelines. Temperatures are regulated and we use R32 refrigerant gas and R410 A, where there is no alternative.
Our Carlton Park Support Centre solar array will be completed in August 2025 and is set to prevent an estimated 288 tCO2 e from entering our atmosphere over the next ve years. This property already benets from heat pumps to provide hot water, and is one of 55 sites across our Group being tted with new EnOS™ technology to improve energy efciency.
When searching for new premises and negotiating leases, we prefer locations with green building certications such as BREEAM or LEED, which demonstrate a landlord's commitment to assessing and improving a building's environmental performance, including energy efciency, water use and the sustainability of raw materials. In FY25, 57% of landlords and construction companies with over £500,000 spend, reported being certied by BREEAM or LEED.
In July 2024, we achieved compliance with Phase 3 of the UK's Energy Savings Opportunity Scheme (ESOS), which involved an assessment of our largest UK sites and logistics operations. As a result, a number of energy efciency enhancements were recommended, including the installation of half hourly (HH) meters across our UK portfolio to gain real-time energy usage insights, improve billing accuracy and highlight cost saving opportunities. To date, over 40% properties record energy consumption on a half hour basis and we will continue the roll-out of HH smart meters in FY26.
In November 2024, we partnered with a global leader in AI powered energy management, to trial a new technology solution which uses intelligent data-driven insights to reduce energy consumption and related emissions. The trial was conducted across our ten most energy intensive UK sites and included a 24/7 energy consumption analysis at an asset level to support energy optimisation through actionable insights and/or automated savings.
The trial was a success, highlighting irregular energy consumption as well as operational inefciencies, resulting in identied savings of 9-20% per annum across the ten sites.
As a result, this technology will be rolled out in an additional 37 sites in the UK and 11 in the US, early in FY26. We anticipate achieving estimated energy savings of 12-20% over a three-year period across our portfolio.

Enhancing energy efciency: A team member installs new LED lighting as part of our commitment to rolling out this technology across our entire property portfolio.

Investing in long-term sustainability: Colleagues measure up for our rooftop solar array at our Carlton Park Support Centre in the UK, which will support our clean energy goals.
During the year, we were pleased to achieve our target of sourcing 100% renewable energy, backed by guarantees of origin.
We also gained approval for the installation of solar panels at our Carlton Park Support Centre in the UK which, on completion in August 2025, will generate over 367,500 kWh of renewable energy per year. This initiative will reduce grid-purchased energy by 30%, cut energy costs by over £15,000 and prevent approximately 57.59 tCO2 e of emissions from entering our atmosphere each year.
The Group's efforts to conserve energy and reduce GHG emissions are continually reviewed and supported by colleague awareness initiatives and training programmes. Our energy use and GHG emissions are reported on page 130.
| Properties we control and where installation is •nancially and practically viable |
FY23 | FY24 FY25 |
Target | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UK | US | Group | UK | US | Europe | Group | UK | US | Europe | Group | 2025 | |
| LED lighting | 90% | 51% | 70% | 85% | 67% | 100% | 84% | 100% | 85% | 100% | 96% | 100% |
| Renewable energy | 100% | 0% | 77% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 77% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% |
Maintaining strong relationships with our landlords is fundamental to the smooth running of our properties and achieving environmental goals.
Our in-house facilities management teams proactively engage landlords to ensure our properties are well maintained, are energy efcient and have the appropriate re, gas and electrical safety certications in place.
For an inclusive shopping environment, we meticulously plan our showroom layouts to ensure accessibility, including space for wheelchair manoeuvrability and unobstructed pathways. Where necessary, we also provide physical accommodations, supported by colleague training to assist clients with disabilities.
All sites are subject to regular, internal and independent audits to ensure conformance with all relevant national and international laws, as well as our own environmental standards.
As a retailer, our water usage is relatively low, however, we take steps to reduce our freshwater intensity wherever possible and promote water-saving measures. Water meter data is used to identify sites with excessive water use and resolve issues, however, we do not currently aggregate and report water use for all sites and are consulting experts with the aim of improving transparency and enhancing our performance in this area.
Water security poses a signicant risk in our supply chain, where polishing gemstones and rening metals consumes a signicant amount of water. Our Vendor Code of Conduct includes a requirement for suppliers to address the prevention, mitigation and control of serious environmental and health impacts resulting from their operations in relation to water use.
Through our Supplier Sustainability Standards, suppliers are asked to assess exposure to water risks, monitor water consumption, minimise water waste and conduct industrial wastewater quality testing and/or monitoring as required by local law. No incidents of non-compliance with water quality or quantity permits, standards or regulations were reported in FY25.
We recognise the benets of effective waste management systems to conserve natural resources, reduce costs and support a more circular economy, and are committed to achieving zero waste to landll across our Group, through avoidance, recycling and reuse.
Across our Group, we have waste management arrangements in place with landlords and certied waste management companies, to ensure the responsible collection, transportation, monitoring, disposal and recycling of waste and compliance with all law and legislation.
In FY25, we continued our efforts to streamline waste management processes and improve data collection, to more accurately quantify our waste volumes and gain a better understanding of the types of materials recycled and resources diverted from landll. Enhanced data has resulted in an increase in waste volumes during the period, highlighting areas for improvement.
Shared waste management facilities in some shopping centres make it difcult for us to accurately record and monitor waste streams and volumes, however, the majority of our shopping centre landlords report low or nil waste to landll volumes. In the UK, all showrooms have been issued with weighing scales and colleagues are asked to separate, weigh and record waste volumes. This is supported by waste management awareness training and colleagues report that they are now more conscious about what they dispose of, and how.
| FY25 | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Waste in tonnes | % to land•ll | Waste in tonnes | % to land•ll | Waste in tonnes | % to land•ll | |
| 889 | 1 | 301 | 1 | 803 | 1 | |
| 210 | 1 | 4 | 1 | 164 | 1 | |
| 53 | 1 | 61 | n/a | 3 | n/a | |
| 1,152 | 367 | 970 | ||||
| 0.0013 | 0.0005 | 0.0017 | ||||
| FY23 | FY24 |
We strive to deliver continuous improvements to our recycling and sustainability programme and comply with the Waste Electronic and Electrical Equipment (WEEE) Directive, which form part of our Group policies and procedures. We enable and encourage WEEE recycling and in the US, recycle all electronics to the standards of the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), and federal and state laws, and engage suppliers with Reece's Law. Due to the mechanical nature of the majority of our watches and the small size of watch batteries, the volume of WEEE we handle is very low.
We comply with all applicable national and international environmental laws and regulations, including the collection, treatment and disposal of hazardous waste, for which we partner with licensed contractors who operate an infrastructure of ISO 9001, ISO 14001 and OHSAS accredited hazardous waste treatment sites.
Our operations produce minimal direct hazardous emissions; however, we monitor and report relevant emissions such as refrigerant leaks (HFCs) and transportrelated air pollutants where applicable, in line with regulatory requirements.

environmental management policy*
* This also includes statements within its disclosures about its strategy, management or plans in this area.


Fine particles of silver generated by our Silver Workshop are ltered at source and collected for recycling by our precious metal supplier. Each year, we recover up to 10kg of silver using this method.
We are working to accurately measure and reduce carbon emissions as a result of downstream transportation, business travel and colleague commuting. These journeys can take place by road, rail, sea and air.
At the end of FY25, almost 97% of our UK vehicle eet was electric or hybrid. We do not operate company cars in the US, with the exception of one lease car within our Roberto Coin Inc. business.
To support the wider use of personal electric and hybrid vehicles, in FY25 we launched a salary sacrice car benet scheme in the UK, providing colleagues with the option of leasing a tax-efcient low emission vehicle.
We also provide 28 charging points across three key Support Centre sites, all of which are on a preferential tariff for colleagues.
Our Travel Policies require colleagues to apply sound judgement before arranging business travel and use public transport whenever practical. Air travel is limited to journeys necessary to progressing business objectives, and digital technologies are widely encouraged as an effective means of enabling collaborative working and maintaining engagement across our Group.
In September 2024, we partnered with Uber for Business to improve operational efciency and sustainability. Since launch, almost 2,500 journeys have been completed using Uber, reducing fares by up to 20% compared with traditional taxis and avoiding an estimated 0.83 tCO2 e as a result of colleagues choosing EV and hybrid options.
Colleagues are encouraged to cycle to work through our cycle to work scheme, which allows them the opportunity of purchasing a tax efcient bicycle and accessories. Support Centre sites are also equipped with showering facilities and cycle parking and our GreenVibE incentive has spurred local colleague car and taxi sharing initiatives.
Our Luxury Watch and Jewellery Virtual Boutique provides clients with an online concierge service, without the need for them to travel. To further support a cleaner, greener, online experience, we continue to increase the number of home deliveries made by EVs in the UK, avoiding almost 20 tCO2 e in FY25, and are working across our Group to offer more clients environmentally friendly delivery options.
Through our Supplier Sustainability Standards, we encourage supplier partners to continually improve the efciency of their transportation and logistics and participate in joint industry initiatives, such as EV100, the global initiative committed to accelerating the transition to electric vehicles by 2030. The Group's own vehicle eet is considered too small to join this initiative.
| FY23 | FY24 | 2030 | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UK | US | Group | UK | US | Europe | Group | UK | US | Europe | Group | Target | |
| Electric or hybrid company eet | 83% | n/a | 83% | 92% | n/a | n/a | 92% | 96.5% | 0.5% | n/a | 96.5% | 100% |
| Home deliveries by electric vehicles | 22% | 0% | 17% | 32% | 0% | n/a | 31% | 38% | 0% | 0% | 37% | 100% |
The Group is committed to reducing any excess own brand packaging and introducing more sustainable materials wherever possible to help reduce waste, conserve resources and minimise pollution.
Research and Development (R&D) projects with supplier partners have resulted in the creation of a range of high-quality, sustainable packaging solutions in the form of shopping bags, wholesale distribution packaging and presentation packaging for own brand jewellery.
In July 2024, Mappin & Webb's product range celebrating the spirit of the Olympics was packaged in the brand's most sustainable packaging to date. Constructed with cardboard frames and covered in 'Mappin Blue' paper, they were made with recycled paper from a mill, which is local to the UK based manufacturer to keep transport to a minimum.
Early in FY26, we began to roll out our rst fully recyclable own brand packaging solution across our UK Goldsmiths business, where all plastic inserts have been removed from branded jewellery presentation boxes and replaced with recycled paper or card alternatives. These bespoke boxes can be easily recycled in household waste streams and will reduce the total weight of this packaging by approximately 4.5 tonnes per year.
Instructions and reminders to recycle are printed on packaging and gift boxes, and where appropriate, clients are asked if they would like to reuse presentation boxes to minimise any negative 'end-of-life' environmental impact.
In line with our Supplier Sustainability Standards, our principal packaging suppliers operate to ISO 9001 and ISO 14001 quality standards, and we are fully compliant with The UK Producer Responsibility Obligations (Packaging Waste) Regulations 2007, through the registered compliance scheme.
Many branded watch boxes are considered part of the product and kept as storage, however, we continue to see developments in packaging design, production and materials, such as the inclusion of sustainable plywood and cardboard, and recycled or faux leather, as well as fully recyclable biodegradable, and compostable materials such as mycelium and soluble seaweed that can be reused as plant fertiliser.
In FY25, we updated our Sustainability Standards to ensure any green claims are veriable and that product information relating to packaging recyclability, or the presence of any potentially hazardous materials is clearly visible.
| FY23 | FY24 | FY25 | 2030 | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UK | US | Europe | Group | UK | US | Europe | Group | UK | US | Europe | Group | Target | |
| Recyclable packaging (own brand)* | 66% | 100% | n/a | 71% | 66% | 100% | n/a | 71% | 66% | 100% | n/a | 71% | 100% |
* Excludes small magnets and foam which must be separated before recycling.



We are committed to protecting nature and biodiversity, which form the foundation of the world's economy, and are essential to a stable climate, healthy ecosystem and the natural resources our business depends on.
We support the recommendations from the Taskforce on Nature-Related Financial Disclosures (TNFD) and continue to work to understand risks and opportunities in relation to nature-related issues within our value chain, to ensure they are incorporated into our strategic planning, risk management and asset allocation decisions.
During an initial LEAP (Locate, Evaluate, Assess and Prepare) exercise conducted through our Planet Working Group in FY25, we found that while our direct impact on nature is relatively low, we depend on procuring products from our supply chain, where there is a greater risk of negatively impacting natural capital. Identied impacts include the extraction of metals and gemstones, freshwater processing, leather for watch straps and deforestation in order to provide paper and wood for packaging and store xtures.
Our Vendor Code of Conduct requires brand partners and other suppliers to prevent, mitigate and control any adverse impacts from their operation, and this is supported by our Supplier Sustainability Standards, which set out our expectations in relation to the preservation of natural resources and rehabilitation of any impacted ecosystems.
As a Group, we consider biodiversity and the impact on nature as an important factor when procuring products and services, as well as in the design and modication of our showrooms, ofces, equipment and processes. We will not tolerate any harsh or inhumane treatment of animals, and all suppliers must conform to relevant international laws and have processes in place to protect endangered species and habitats.
Our Carlton Park Support Centre is set within 32 acres of maintained woodlands and green space, which are home to a variety of plant life and insects.
Clients can choose from a growing number of more sustainable product options, including watch straps and packaging made from a variety of waste materials, including recycled stainless steel, plastic, rubber and cloth, and we are starting to see more biodegradable elements in products and packaging.
Hard woods or hard wood veneers found within items such as branded jewellery boxes and watch cases, are sourced from reputable, sustainably managed sources and we only allow certied timber in new showrooms, workshops and ofce designs.
Plans to introduce bees and beehives to our Carlton Park Support Centre in FY25 were paused after concerns over possible allergies, however, we will continue to actively seek opportunities to support our local ecosystems and the biodiversity of plant and animal life.
25% Product suppliers* report using recyclable and/or biodegradable materials in their packaging
41% Suppliers* refer to the protection
of nature in their reporting
* Over £500,000 spend in FY25.

The Group recognises the importance of an economy where resources are used, reused and recycled to conserve resources and minimise waste and pollution.
We are committed to promoting innovation and advancement in circular design, while keeping more watches and jewellery in circulation through our repairs and pre-owned businesses.
We are proud to possess the largest watch repairs capacity out of all UK retailers, helping us to attract and train highly skilled watchmakers, accelerate repair and servicing turnaround times, and support the year-on-year growth of pre-owned watch sales.
Our UK repairs and servicing operation comprises two main repairs and servicing centres in Manchester and Leicester, as well as repairs benches within key showrooms. All facilities are meticulously designed and equipped to the highest Swiss standards, allowing our accredited watchmakers and technicians to support strategic brand partners, in addition to fullling our own in-house repairs.
In March 2025, we opened our new Authorised Service Centre at the agship Rolex boutique on Old Bond Street, London. Clients visiting the service lounge can look through the glazed partition to see our expert watchmakers, technicians and polisher at work. During the year, we also opened Rolex Authorised Service Centres in Birmingham and Newcastle in the UK.
After enjoying a post-pandemic boom in repairs volumes for three consecutive years, we saw a dip in client demand in FY25 as the service market stabilised. Additionally, our analysis indicated that an uncertain economy and higher living costs had led to some clients delaying routine services.
To reinvigorate demand and promote an understanding of the benets of regular servicing, we ran a series of advertorials in key UK titles, supported by a dedicated Client Relationship Management (CRM) programme reminding clients of the importance of professionally servicing luxury watches to ensure they remain at their optimum performance and highest value for as long as possible.
In the US, our Repairs and Servicing Group (RSG) comprises two strategically located service centres in Florida and Connecticut, as well as two watchmakers operating in the Rolex boutique.
After a 54% growth in US watch repair sales from FY22 to FY24, we saw a slight annual decrease of 2% in FY25, albeit remaining at encouraging levels.
Improvement areas to support further growth include investment into a new inventory management system to improve expense tracking and analyse productivity, and attracting more skilled watchmakers and technicians to support our circularity goals.
Watchmaking combines precision engineering with ne craftsmanship, and offers opportunities and a unique sense of accomplishment that few careers can match. We use a variety of channels to raise awareness of this specialised trade, including engagement with schools and colleges, along with other educational institutions, to actively recruit talented individuals to join our team.
We also have a presence at industry careers events and are a long-standing supporter of the British School of Watchmaking. In FY25, we recruited four colleagues from our UK retail and support teams to train as watchmakers, technicians and polishers, thereby enabling career aspirations. Positive colleague feedback has since featured in advertorials to highlight opportunities for women in watchmaking and help inspire future careers.
In FY25, sales of pre-owned watches grew 39% year-on-year, thereby reducing the demand for raw materials and resulting in less overall energy and waste.
Every pre-owned piece we sell requires an element of repair and/or servicing to ensure it is in the best possible condition, works perfectly and is veried as authentic by our experts.
The Group is proud to be part of the network of ofcial Rolex retailers, authorised to sell Rolex Certied Pre-Owned watches. This programme attracts clients who see brand-certied, fully warrantied and guaranteed pre-owned timepieces as a more sustainable and accessible alternative to new models. We also offer a curated collection of luxury pre-owned watches and vintage timepieces from brands including a number of luxury brands. Key pieces are available to purchase in showrooms, displayed under the banner of Watches of Switzerland Certied Pre-Owned and Rolex Certied Pre-Owned, plus an extended collection is available via our online channels.
In line with our goal to highlight the sustainable attributes of the products we sell and services we offer, in FY25 we delivered our rst UK marketing campaign targeted solely at promoting pre-owned sales. Our 'We Buy, We Sell, We Exchange' campaign went live across performance marketing, social media, email, CRM and in-store.
Our US-based business, Analog:Shift, specialises in pairing clients with unique pre-owned and vintage pieces that reect individual style and values. Clients can browse a curated collection of timeless pieces on our analogshift.com website, or view them in person within selected showrooms. The brand's 'Transmissions' newsletter also supports sustainable practices by encouraging the appreciation and reuse of heritage timepieces.
The Hodinkee business, which we acquired in October 2024, is a global digital editorial content provider for horology enthusiasts. This US based business presents opportunities to further engage audiences with the sustainability value of pre-owned watches.
In the spirit of Xenia, exclusive client events were also held in the US and UK throughout FY25 as a means to promote pre-owned watches as a considered, more sustainable purchase option.
| FY22 | FY23 | FY24 | FY25 | YoY | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Specialist roles | UK | US | Group | UK | US | Group | UK | US | Group | UK | US | Group | Increase | |
| Accredited watchmakers | 35 | 20 | 55 | 37 | 26 | 63 | 34 | 21 | 55 | 41 | 23 | 64 | +9 | |
| Technicians, administrators and polishing experts |
15 | 12 | 27 | 23 | 16 | 39 | 32 | 18 | 50 | 40 | 20 | 60 | +10 |

Since 1846, Ulysse Nardin's mission has been to advance watchmaking. Over the past 179 years of undisrupted manufacturing, the independent, Swiss Maison has taken signicant efforts across technical innovation resulting in the improved sustainability of its timepieces.
In April 2025, Ulysse Nardin launched the world's lightest mechanical dive watch: the Diver Air weighing in at 51.7 grams while exceeding the high standards for robustness required in a dive watch. The resulting pioneering, high horology sport watch is both high performance and high technology, thoughtfully crafted from materials sourced from a network of start-ups in Europe and their in-house micromechanical silicon lab, Sigatec.
Over ve years of R&D, Ulysse Nardin landed on four key materials to create the Diver Air: titanium, silicon, Nylo®-Foil and carbon-foil. Achieving a superior robustness-to-lightness ratio, the high-grade titanium used is 90% recycled and is harvested from biomedical labs in Switzerland.
The silicon, which was pioneered into watchmaking by Ulysse Nardin in 2001 with the introduction of the Freak, has itself been upcycled and used to create the escapement wheel and anchor of the Diver Air. Nylo®-Foil, a combination of 60% ocean netting (Nylo®) harvested from Les Sables d'Olonne, France and 40% upcycled carbon bre, has been used to achieve incredible lightness in the Diver Air. Finally, carbon-foil, a highly technical material, is upcycled carbon bre from IMOCA boats, the world's fastest sailboats used in the extreme world of ocean racing.
While Ulysse Nardin continues to be renowned for developing some of the most technically complex and high horology timepieces, the Diver Air is a compelling example of how the Manufacture sets the standard for innovation in mechanical watchmaking.
The Diver Air is available at our Watches of Switzerland showrooms.
Our Mappin & Webb business is proud to hold Royal Warrant status to His Majesty the King. The Group's commitment to sustainability and reducing our impact on the environment was a determining factor in our application process.
Mappin & Webb's skilled craftsmen and women can restore jewellery and silverware items of any age, make or design to their original glory, and we offer clients a range of repair, cleaning, restoration and renovation services, alongside the latest branded and ne jewellery collections. Items can be skilfully modernised and customised to complement individual tastes and lifestyles, while reducing the reliance on raw materials.
Our support of a more circular economy is further boosted by our Susan Caplan offering and Betteridge business in the US, which specialise in the restoration of vintage designer jewellery.
After entering a three-year partnership with the AHCI in FY25, we continued to work with this non-prot organisation to help preserve traditional watchmaking, support talented watchmakers and promote quality, innovation and creativity.
AHCI spotlights watchmaking's rising stars and provides support and guidance as they hone their craft and drive mechanical innovation and artistic breakthrough. As an ofcial partner, we are able to call on their network of well-established, prestigious watchmakers to help elevate the craftsmanship, precision and allure of luxury watches through events and other activities.
During the year, the renowned watchmaker and AHCI member, Vianney Halter, joined an exclusive event in London to meet with interested collectors.

We support the recommendations of the Financial Stability Board's Task Force on Climate-Related Financial Disclosures (TCFD) and continue to evolve our ESG Strategy to ensure climate-related risks and opportunities are identied and managed in a structured, transparent and measurable way.
During the year, we:
We are committed to reducing absolute Scope 1 and 2 GHG emissions by 50% by 2030 from a FY20 baseline. We also commit to reducing absolute Scope 3 GHG emissions by 42% within the same timeframe. These near-term targets are aligned to a 1.5°C trajectory and have been veried by the Science Based Targets initiative (SBTi).
The achievement of these targets is linked to our Sustainability Linked Loan, providing us with a clearly dened pathway to reduce GHG emissions in the near-term. More information on our progress towards meeting these targets can be found on page 103 of this report. In line with best practice, in FY26, we will reapply to the SBTi for their approval of an achievable and ambitious net-zero target to 2050, in order to help prevent the worst impacts of climate change and future-proof business growth.
Our newly acquired Roberto Coin Inc. business provides the Group with exclusive rights to import and distribute Roberto Coin jewellery in the US, Canada, Central America and the Caribbean. While we are condent of existing business continuity plans, we recognise these areas are particularly vulnerable to extreme weather conditions, and in FY26 we will conduct a new Climate Scenario Analysis (CSA) of our business operations, including Roberto Coin Inc..
In meeting the requirements of the Listing Rules UKLR 6.6.6R(8), we have concluded that we are fully aligned with the TCFD reporting recommendations for the accounting period ending 27 April 2025.
In the table below, we set out details of the TCFD reporting recommendations against the 11 disclosure requirements, along with the UK Government's Climate-Related Financial Disclosure (CFD) requirements. To do this, we referred to the documents in the Listing Rules guidance notes, taking into account the 2021 TCFD all sector guidance.
| TCFD disclosure | CFD requirements | Summary of disclosure | More information | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GOVERNANCE | ||||
| Describe the Board's oversight of climate-related risks and opportunities |
Describe the Company's governance arrangements in relation to assessing and managing climate-related risks and opportunities |
The Board, led by the Chair, Ian Carter, has overall responsibility for managing climate-related risks, as well as ensuring our strategy creates value and achieves our Purpose: to WOW our clients while caring for our colleagues, our communities and our planet. |
Climate Governance Framework on page 119 Principal Risks and Uncertainties on pages 145 to 153 |
|
| The Board considers climate-related issues when reviewing and guiding our strategy, setting business performance objectives and agreeing annual budgets, including major capital expenditures, such as the implementation of a new Energy Management System in our most energy intensive sites. |
||||
| The ESG Committee, chaired by Independent Non-Executive Director, Baroness (Rosa) Monckton MBE, meets three times a year, plus an additional session for targeted training, and addresses climate-related issues. The ESG Committee reports key matters it has considered along with decisions it has made, and makes recommendations, particularly on documents for approval to the Board, for example, changes to our ESG pillars, associated targets and supporting documents, such as our Environment Policy, Vendor Code of Conduct and Supplier Sustainability Standards. |
||||
| The ESG Committee monitors performance against climate-related goals and targets, using frameworks such as the CDP questionnaire on climate change, and challenges our ESG Steering Group on progress. The ESG Committee also ensures the Group has an effective risk management system in place, with key climate-related risks being principally governed between both our ESG Committee and Audit & Risk Committee, which meets on a quarterly basis. |
| TCFD disclosure | CFD requirements | Summary of disclosure | More information | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GOVERNANCE | ||||
| Describe management's role in assessing and managing climate related risks and opportunities |
Describe the Company's governance arrangements in relation to assessing and managing climate-related risks and opportunities |
As part of our ongoing improvement and in acknowledgement of the threats associated with a changing climate and extreme weather, we regularly review our approach and processes to ensure the effectiveness of our management of the climate-related risks and opportunities impacting on our value chain. The Board, led by Ian Carter, has overall responsibility for climate-related issues and stays informed on current best practice in climate governance by maintaining dialogue with peers, policy makers, investors and other key stakeholders and works to ensure material climate-related risks, opportunities and strategic decisions are transparently reported to stakeholders. |
ESG Governance on page 76 Climate Governance Framework on page 119 |
|
| Our CEO, Brian Duffy, has overall operational responsibility for our climate strategy, including the mitigation of climate-related risks and leveraging opportunities identied as a result of a changing climate. Climate-related risks and opportunities identied over the short-medium and long-term are presented to the Audit & Risk Committee and ESG Committee on an ongoing basis. |
||||
| This process ensures materiality is properly assessed at varying levels of our business and the appropriate action is taken. The below governance framework is in place to ensure climate-related risks and opportunities are understood, managed and regularly reported, and that they are integrated into the Group's core business strategy, risk management processes and investment decisions. |
||||
| STRATEGY | ||||
| Describe the climate-related risks and opportunities the organisation has identied over the short, medium, and long-term |
Description of 1) the principal climate-related risks and opportunities arising in connection with the Company's operations, and 2) the time periods by reference to which those risks and opportunities are assessed |
We consider climate-related risks and opportunities across the short (<5 years), medium (5-10 years) and long-term (>10 years) and these time horizons were considered according to our sector, the life span of our assets, the type of the climate-related risks and opportunities we face, and the geographies in which we operate. |
Assumptions can be found on page 121 Financial boundaries can be found on page 120 |
|
| The severity of the impacts we experience is determined by the extent to which the world warms. We therefore considered potential impacts for a range of possible scenarios: |
||||
| – 1.5°C above pre-industrial levels, in line with what the latest climate science says is necessary to avoid the worst physical impacts of climate change with increased transition risk |
||||
| – Below 2°C above pre-industrial levels, in line with gradually increasing stringency of climate policy to limit the physical impacts of climate change |
||||
| – 2-3°C disorderly transition above pre-industrial levels, where the transition to a low-carbon economy is delayed increasing the risk associated with the transition |
||||
| – 4°C above pre-industrial levels, which is our current warming pathway if the world does not take climate action, potentially exposing us to the most extreme physical impacts of climate change |
||||
| We consider risks in terms of both impact and probability. Impact refers to the severity of the consequences that may arise from a risk event, while probability refers to the likelihood or chance of the risk event occurring within the considered climate scenarios. Likelihood is dependent on the scenario considered and is determined through the outputs of the scenario modelling. |
| TCFD disclosure | CFD requirements | Summary of disclosure | More information |
|---|---|---|---|
| STRATEGY | |||
| Describe the impact of climate-related risks and opportunities on the organisation's businesses, strategy, and nancial planning |
Description of the actual and potential impacts of the principal climate related risks and opportunities on the Company's business model and strategy |
Following a strategic review, we assigned nancial impacts to identied climate-related risks and opportunities and have integrated them into our budget and long-range planning process. |
Pages 120 to 121 |
| Our strategic review process also focused on target setting and considerations such as energy efciency and supply chain transparency, which are incorporated into our long-term strategy and standard business processes. |
|||
| Strategic opportunities which progressed in FY25 include continuing the roll-out of LED lighting and successfully trialling new EnOS™ technology in the ten most energy intensive sites in the UK, strengthening our procurement function to identify and deliver efciencies, and improving supply chain engagement and transparency. |
|||
| We have assessed the potential impacts of identied climate-related risks on key suppliers and assigned nal risk scores based on: |
|||
| – Exposure to the hazard, derived through modelling the likelihood of the hazard in low and high-carbon scenarios |
|||
| – Vulnerability, assessing the potential nancial impact of the hazard and mitigation actions through interviews and discussions with internal stakeholders and key suppliers |
|||
| The table on pages 123 to 125 includes identied high-rated risks. All identied climate-related risks and opportunities were disclosed within our response to the 2024 CDP questionnaire on climate change. |
|||
| Our Roberto Coin Inc. business, acquired in May 2024, provides the Group with exclusive rights to import and distribute Roberto Coin jewellery in the US, Canada, Central America and the Caribbean. All these areas are vulnerable to extreme weather conditions, therefore, we will carry out a full climate risk assessment of this business and its value chain in FY26 in order to pinpoint potential risks and test the robustness of existing contingency plans. |
|||
| Describe the resilience of the organisation's strategy, taking into consideration different climate-related scenarios, including a 2°C or lower scenario |
An analysis of the resilience of the Company's business model and strategy, taking into consideration different climate-related scenarios |
The Group recognises the importance of taking steps to ensure our assets and business strategy are resilient to the inevitable effects of a changing climate. |
Page 122 |
| To test the robustness of our business strategy, we conducted a qualitative and quantitative climate scenario analysis of our business operation in FY22, and on our supply chain in FY23, considering a considering an orderly (1.5°C and 2°C), disorderly (2-3°C) and business-as-usual (4°C) scenario up to 2050. This analysis enabled us to identify key climate-related risks and opportunities faced by the Group and understand where in our operations we may be vulnerable. These risks are reviewed on an annual basis. |
|||
| As a result of our analysis, we enhanced our business processes, for example, we assess climate-related risks when negotiating leases, and during our procurement process we ask suppliers to set carbon reduction targets and encourage them to align with the objectives of the Paris Climate Agreement to limit global warming to 1.5°C. |
|||
| Local business continuity plans were activated in Florida due to Hurricane Milton in October 2024, and again in California during destructive wildres in Palisades in January 2025. Both severe weather events led to the temporary closure of showrooms and a potential loss of sales, although it is likely clients delayed their purchases, due to the wide-scale impact of the emergency on the wider community and nearby competitors. Just one showroom in Florida suffered damage in the form of a roof leak and no colleagues or clients were harmed. |
|||
| In January 2025, we ran a business continuity workshop with a third-party. The workshop was attended by members of Senior Management and aimed to bring awareness, test the Company's BCP and strengthen its robustness. This includes climate-related risks and events, such as severe weather creating problems, for |
example a power outage.
| TCFD disclosure | CFD requirements | Summary of disclosure | More information | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RISK MANAGEMENT | ||||
| Describe the organisation's processes for identifying and assessing climate related risks |
Description of how the Company identies, assesses, and manages climate-related risks and opportunities |
Our climate-related risks and opportunities sit within detailed risk classication frameworks. The Group denes risk as uncertainty around the organisation's ability to achieve its objectives and execute its strategy effectively. As a principal risk, climate-related risks are identied and assessed using the same established framework as other signicant risks impacting the business. |
Principal Risks and Uncertainties on pages 149 to 153 |
|
| In addition, stakeholder consultation and qualitative climate scenario analysis are used alongside an analysis of existing and emerging regulatory requirements, to understand key physical and transition climate-related risks and opportunities affecting our business operation. |
||||
| Within our supply chain we have conducted a mapping exercise, carried out a quantitative Climate Scenario Analysis (CSA) and engaged internal and external stakeholders in a series of workshops to identify, manage and mitigate climate-related supply chain risks. |
||||
| In FY25, the Group introduced AI Agent technology to help identify suppliers who actively assess, manage and report the impact of climate change and extreme weather conditions on their operation and supply chain. The resulting reports are used to help us understand each individual supplier's approach to climate risk and mitigation and thereby gauge the level of risk to the sustainability of our business. |
||||
| Identied risks are monitored on an ongoing basis, allowing us to identify any changes and make the necessary adaptations. |
||||
| Describe the organisation's processes for managing climate related risks |
Description of how the Company identies, assesses, and manages climate-related risks and opportunities |
We take the necessary mitigation or adaptation actions to prepare for identied climate-related risks, depending on the severity of the risk. Similarly, where opportunities associated with adaption to climate change are identied, we work to leverage them. |
Principal Risks and Uncertainties on pages 149 to 153 |
|
| The Group has embedded a robust risk management process across all principal risks. Identied risks are incorporated into our Group risk register and risks that are classied as major or severe are escalated to the Board, whereas minor and moderate risks are handled by the ESG Committee working alongside the Audit & Risk Committee or risk owners who are responsible for ongoing risk review. |
||||
| Describe how processes for |
Description of how processes for identifying, assessing, and managing climate-related risks are integrated into the Company's overall risk management process |
The Group classies, assesses and manages climate change as a principal risk through our overall risk management approach. |
Climate Risk Management Process |
|
| identifying, assessing, and managing climate-related risks are integrated into the organisation's overall risk management |
We consider climate-related risks and opportunities using the TCFD categories, which cover transition risks (political and legal, market, technology and reputation), and physical risks (acute and chronic), as well as opportunities posed by a transition to a low-carbon economy (resource efciency, energy source, products and services, market opportunity). |
on pages 145 to 148 | ||
| Identied risks are mitigated through our established risk management process. |
| TCFD disclosure | CFD requirements | Summary of disclosure | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| METRICS AND TARGETS | |||||
| Disclose the metrics used by the organisation to assess climate-related risks and opportunities in line with its strategy and risk management process |
KPIs used to assess progress of targets used to manage climate-related risks and realise climate-related opportunities and a description of the |
We have mapped both our operational and supply chain risks identied in our qualitative and quantitative CSA to metrics, which allow us to track our progress managing these risks. |
Metrics and Targets on page 127 |
||
| During a workshop with internal stakeholders, we reviewed and approved additional metrics to monitor our supply chain risks such as extreme weather events, extraction of raw materials, introduction of carbon prices and legislative requirements. |
|||||
| calculations on which those key performance indicators are based |
The Group has collected data against these metrics and assigned responsible data owners to monitor them in line with our strategy and risk management process. |
||||
| Disclose Scope 1, Scope 2, and, if appropriate, Scope 3 greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, and the related risks |
N/A | The Group reports Scope 1, 2 and 3 GHG emissions, which are calculated in line with the GHG Protocol methodology. Our gures are externally assured and reported over a three-year period within our Annual Report and Accounts. The methodologies used to calculate our metrics are also reported. As well as the absolute gure, we report our intensity ratios, which allow us to understand the impact of our growing business. |
GHG Emissions on page 130 |
||
| Describe the targets used by the organisation to manage climate related risks and opportunities and performance against targets |
Description targets used by the Company to manage climate-related risks and to realise climate-related opportunities and of performance against those targets |
Our near-term targets to achieve net-zero GHG emissions in line with a 1.5°C trajectory have been validated by the SBTi. The Group commits to reduce absolute Scope 1 and 2 GHG emissions 50% by 2030 from a FY20 baseline. The Group also commits to reduce absolute Scope 3 GHG emissions by 42% within the same timeframe. These targets are underpinned by a series of goals to help us manage risks and opportunities and these are reported on page 128. In FY26, we will submit new near and long-term targets to reach net-zero by 2050 to the SBTi for validation. |
Metrics and Targets on page 127 |
Brian Duffy, CEO, has overall operational responsibility for our climate strategy and the mitigation of related risks. Anders Romberg, CFO, has day-to-day operational responsibility for identifying and addressing climate-related risks and opportunities and chairs the monthly ESG Steering Group. This Steering Group reports up to the ESG Committee and is comprised of senior leaders who each have responsibility for assessing and managing climate-related risks and opportunities against KPIs aligned to our ESG pillars of People, Planet and Product.
The ESG Steering Group is advised by Kesah Trowell, Head of Sustainability and ESG, who has signicant experience in climate-related matters. It ensures all operational matters in respect to our ESG Strategy are fully embedded into our wider business strategy and operation, through weekly engagement with our Trading Board and ad hoc, as required. Our Finance team plays a key role in ensuring climate-related risks and opportunities are embedded into our core business strategy, by ensuring that they are considered within our budget planning and approval processes.
Climate-related issues are monitored by the Audit & Risk Committee as part of the review of principal and emerging risks. Each ESG pillar is supported by working groups, who also have a responsibility for identifying climate-related risks and opportunities. Our working groups include senior operational managers who are assisted by input from the Head of Sustainability and ESG, and external consultants. These working groups generally meet every four to six weeks and are chaired by departmental ESG Steering Group members.
Our Planet Working Group has responsibility for developing and implementing the Group's Climate Strategy, which includes reducing Scope 1 and 2 carbon emissions resulting from buildings and logistics, energy and waste management. Our Product Working Group is responsible for developing and executing our Supply Chain Engagement Strategy, including managing the environmental and ethical impacts of products within our value chain, such as the impact of raw material extraction, manufacturing, packaging and transportation.
All Working Groups have joint responsibility for reducing Scope 3 emissions. In FY25, the Group recruited a new Head of Procurement and introduced a new Procurement Policy and supporting processes to help gauge the level of new and existing supplier alignment with our environmental goals, including climate mitigation and adaptation.
– Chaired by Ian Carter
Chaired by Non-Executive Director, Robert Moorhead
Reviews internal controls and provides accountability
Chaired by CEO, Brian Duffy
Co-ordinated by Kesah Trowell, Head of Sustainability and ESG
Led by Philippa Jackson, Executive Director, Human Resources
Helps achieve goals and feed back areas for improvement
The Group considers climate change to be a principal risk and as such, our approach to mitigating and managing climate-related risks and leveraging opportunities is incorporated into our core business strategy and operation.
We use the following time horizons across the short, medium, and long-term, which are agreed by the Board and in line with time horizons used when considering wider strategic and business planning.
| Impact time horizon | Year from | Year to | Duration |
|---|---|---|---|
| Short-term | FY26 | FY30 | <5 years |
| Medium-term | FY31 | FY35 | 5-10 years |
| Long-term | FY36 | FY36+ | >10 years |
The timeframes were dened according to the retail sector and the nature of the climate-related risks we face, such as physical risks, ensuring business continuity, changing consumer preferences, regulatory changes and reputation. We also considered the long lifespan of our assets, our infrastructure and the geographies in which we operate.
Our risk classication scoring is as follows:
| Financial impact | EBIT impact | Probability | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Negligible | < 1% of EBIT | Rare |
| 2 | Minor | 1-5% of EBIT | Unlikely |
| 3 | Moderate | 5-10% of EBIT | Moderate |
| 4 | Major | 10-20% of EBIT | Likely |
| 5 | Severe | > 20% of EBIT | Almost certain |
The nancial impact of a risk includes any potential control and mitigation costs incurred to manage the risk and the cost of repair/replacement programmes or loss of revenue if the risk were to be realised.
| Risks | Opportunities | |
|---|---|---|
| Climate-related risks and opportunities assessed during a CSA of our business operations |
Extreme weather events disrupting key sites and IT systems |
Energy efciency initiatives across our property portfolio and introduction of Uninterruptable Power Supplies (UPS) |
| Increased energy requirements |
Procuring renewable energy and generating energy on-site |
|
| Changing consumer preferences |
Promoting the longevity of well-made watches and jewellery, along with our pre-owned and repairs offerings |
|
| Exposure to carbon pricing |
Proactive collaboration with suppliers to reduce energy |

Our Climate Scenario Analysis considered the following scenarios using data from publicly available third-party sources, Network for Greening the Financial System (NGFS) and IPCC Shared Socioeconomic Pathways:
| Scenario | Transition scenario |
Physical scenario |
|---|---|---|
| 1.5ºC – Rapid transition to a global low-carbon economy – Unied regulations and ambitious climate policies are implemented |
NGFS net-zero GHG emissions by 2050 |
Not considered* |
| immediately and smoothly Below 2ºC |
NGFS below 2 degrees |
IPCC SSP1 RCP2.6 |
| – Steady transition to a global low-carbon economy |
||
| – Required by the TCFD recommendations |
||
| – Aligns with the Group's net-zero GHG emissions target |
||
| 2-3ºC disorderly transition – Delayed and disorderly transition leading to notable transition and physical impacts |
NGFS delayed transition |
IPCC SSP2 RCP4.5 |
| 4ºC | NGFS current policies |
IPCC SSP5 RCP8.5 |
| – Business-as-usual emissions – Assumes climate inaction – No additional policies are implemented to address the climate agenda and temperatures rise to 4°C above pre-industrial levels |
* Below 2°C scenario has been used which is also a low-carbon scenario.
The above scenarios were chosen as these cover a broad range of possible climate outcomes. The 1.5°C highlights transition risks experienced through a shift to a low-carbon economy, whilst the 4°C scenario highlights the greater physical risks present under a business-as-usual outcome. This allowed the Group to assess the resilience of our business strategy across a range of potential outcomes.
Assumptions and estimates included within the qualitative and quantitative CSA are shown in the below tables:
| Physical risks | ||
|---|---|---|
| Flooding and wind | – Flood events are assumed to only impact the oor the Group occupies. Each oor is assumed to be three metres (10 ft) high |
|
| – For the UK, uvial/river ooding is the dominant form of ooding |
||
| – For Florida in the US, uvial ooding dominates in the lower return periods, whilst coastal ooding driven by hurricanes dominates in the higher return periods |
||
| – Stock, xtures and ttings and IT equipment values have been taken at their net book value |
||
| – Group sites and assets are assumed to be static to isolate the climate signal from extreme weather events |
||
| Heating and cooling (changing energy costs) |
– Proportion of energy used at all showrooms by heating and cooling is constant |
|
| – Energy consumption remains constant over time to isolate the climatic signal |
||
| Transition risks | ||
| Carbon pricing on Scope 1 |
– NGFS carbon price data taken to be applied to all Scope 1 and Scope 2 operational emissions |
|
| and Scope 2 emissions | – Carbon price is applied in replacement of the Climate Change Levy (CCL) from 2020 onwards, which could result in cost savings |
| Transition risks | |
|---|---|
| Carbon pricing exposure |
– 2°C scenario assumes that a carbon price is applied uniformly across all countries |
| – Stainless steel was selected as the material of focus since it is the largest single material in quantity in a wristwatch |
|
| – We estimated that the content of stainless steel per wristwatch is approximately 100g |
|
| – We calculated the carbon footprint of a watch based on the estimated emissions associated with the production of stainless steel |
|
| – We assumed that the stainless steel used in the production of the watches is imported into the European Union to be further transformed |
Following our qualitative CSA, in FY23 we conducted a quantitative CSA for our direct operations to quantify the potential nancial impact, as well as other business impacts, such as consumer sentiment and impacts to our value chain in relation to key risks.
Additionally, the assessment allowed the Group to identify risk hotspot locations to inform mitigation actions. The following physical risks were analysed in the quantitative CSA:
To assess the exposure of all sites to extreme weather events and increased energy requirements for heating and cooling, we considered the following indicators in FY22:
The key ndings have enabled the Group to identify climate-related risk areas within our operations and implement adaptive measures as described in the risk table on pages 123 to 125, allowing us to strengthen the resilience of our strategy to climate-related risks and opportunities.
The impact of carbon pricing on energy consumption and direct emissions was also considered. Although this risk was identied as a medium risk in the qualitative CSA, further assessment, which included a workshop with key decision makers and external consultants, to understand the impact, showed a low risk due to the low potential nancial impact on the Group, in terms of EBIT.
In FY25, we carried out an assessment to understand how our business activities align with requirements from the TPT. This involved a series of interviews with key stakeholders to review internal practices and processes and understand our level of preparedness when building a strategic transition action plan. During these interviews, stakeholders shared their views on the availability of necessary data, as well as data quality, suitability and management. Stakeholders were also asked to assess the Group's decarbonisation strategy, action plans and operational decision-making, and invited to voice any challenges delivering current commitments and overcoming barriers. We also gained stakeholder input into nancial planning processes and the Group's future strategy, as well as the effectiveness of internal and external sustainability/communication strategies, training and internal governance to strengthen climate resilience and full our commitment to net-zero by 2050. More information about this work can be found on page 103.
To discuss, determine and consider climate-related risks and opportunities that could have a material impact within our supply chain, in FY24 and FY25 we engaged with internal and external stakeholders through a series of workshops, which were hosted with the help of external consultants.
Key logistics routes, storage sites and warehouses were identied and the impacts of risks caused by the identied hazards were assessed in both a low-carbon and high-carbon scenario up to 2040.
| Risks | Opportunities | |
|---|---|---|
| Climate-related risks identied during a mapping exercise and |
Extreme weather events disrupting logistics, caused by hazards including: |
Improve business continuity and planning |
| CSA of our supply chain |
– Extreme precipitation at two logistics sites in the UK |
|
| – Extreme heat at one logistics site in the US |
||
| – Cyclones and hurricanes at one logistic site in the US |
||
| – Raw material extraction (minerals and agriculture) disrupted |
Build climate-related clauses into relevant contracts |
|
| – Extreme heat at a stainless steel mining location in China |
||
| Introduction of carbon pricing | Understand cost implications and factor into our decision making processes and budget forecasting |
|
The results of our supply chain quantitative CSA have highlighted the robustness and resilience of the Group's supply chain management when faced with value chain climate-related risk, in both a low and high-carbon scenario. We have found that, when considering existing mitigations in place to manage risks, the overall impact to the Group's operations is low for the risks analysed so far.
This CSA does not include our recent acquisition of Roberto Coin Inc., which needs reliable, efcient transport operators to full its business of distributing jewellery to the US, Canada, Central America and the Caribbean. We recognise that these geographies are all vulnerable to extreme weather conditions and will conduct a CSA of Roberto Coin Inc. in FY26.
In addition, the CSA does not include the Hodinkee business, which we acquired in October 2024. Hodinkee is a global digital editorial content provider and gateway for horology enthusiasts. Both Roberto Coin Inc. and Hodinkee are based in ofces with a small land footprint in New York City and are considered a low risk from the impact of severe weather. These businesses are covered by comprehensive insurance policies and will be fully assessed for climate-related risks and opportunities as part of our Group's climate strategy and reporting in FY26.
Unexpected global events have demonstrated the resilience of our logistics operations and ability to quickly adapt to change. The Group allows for the exibility to work with various logistics suppliers across all operational geographies to full door-to-door deliveries and web orders, should a supplier be impacted by potential climate risks.
From a nancial perspective, there would be little to no impact to our logistics operation in low-carbon or high-carbon scenarios, due to the ability to switch
suppliers, and this is built into our BCP. Cost implications have also been considered in budget timelines looking ahead over the short and long-term impact time horizons. In some instances, switching logistics partners might result in a cost saving, due to our new procurement capability and enhanced tendering process. Our analysis found that the Group's suppliers have well-established climate risk mitigation actions in place, and this is supported by ndings from our new supplier screening capability provided by AI Agent technology.
Engagement with a primary brand partner is in progress to assess their risk exposure against extreme heat in sourcing locations and the risk of carbon pricing on stainless steel. Finalising the assessment will allow the Group to understand the vulnerability scores to both climate hazards.
Reaching net-zero GHG emissions and managing emerging risks associated with a changing climate presents both physical and transitional risks. It also presents opportunities, to our business through adaption to a low-carbon economy.
Risks are prioritised using impact ratings of Low, Medium or High, and are determined by combining the likelihood of the risk arising, with the potential impact of the risk, should it happen. This impact scoring is in line with the Group's risk register where the materiality of each risk is considered.
We consider risks and opportunities using the TCFD categories covering transition risks (political and legal, market, technology and reputation) and physical risks (acute and chronic), as well as opportunities presented within the transition to a low-carbon economy (resource efciency, energy source, products and services and market opportunity).
All geographies are considered when assessing risks. We have a relatively small number of operational sites (ofces, showrooms and distribution centres) across the UK and US, however, risks are likely to vary across different regions and site types. The acquisition of Roberto Coin Inc. in May 2024 has widened the scope of our operation to include logistics hubs in Canada and the Caribbean. In general, these areas are vulnerable to the impacts of a changing climate, with Canada facing rising temperatures, more frequent extreme weather events and sea level rise, while the Caribbean is particularly vulnerable due to its geographic location and socioeconomic circumstances, making it susceptible to intense storms, droughts and sea-level rise.
The process for identifying and assessing climate-related risks and opportunities is set out in our Climate Governance framework on page 119. Identied risks are composed of a combination of interrelated elements that could impact the Group, for example, the demand for particular products, operational costs and regulatory requirements. They also present physical risks to our premises in addition to our supply chain and logistics.
The table on pages 123 to 125 includes all High rated risks identied pre-mitigation, which is where our climate initiatives focus. We do not report Medium or Low risks considered in this table, however, all climate-related risks we have identied to date are disclosed within our annual response to the CDP questionnaire on climate change. Climate-related risks and opportunities are reviewed annually as part of our risk management process and disclosed.
All risks featured in the table below are rated as High, however, we acknowledge that more signicant impacts will be experienced for climate-related physical risks under higher warming scenarios of 4°C, whereas the impacts of transition risks will be more signicant under lower warming scenarios.
To ensure active and holistic management of all climate-related risk components, our emissions reduction pathways take into account both the direct and supply chain impacts on biodiversity, as well as the effects of a changing climate on business initiatives.
| Risk | Time horizon | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Risk type | category | Scenario | Short | Medium | Long | ||
| ACUTE PHYSICAL Cyclone, hurricane, typhoon |
Physical | <2°C 4°C |
|||||
| DETAIL In the US (particularly Florida) hurricanes are an annual occurrence which could disrupt the ability to receive products and distribute them around the country. MITIGATION – We have insurance policies in place to cover nancial losses, either partially or fully and based on international spread and our showroom presence. Physical controls are also in place. Suppliers are able to send products directly to showrooms – Contingency plans are in place within all sites at risk |
Magnitude of impact post mitigation: Minor |
Likelihood of impact post mitigation: Likely |
Financial impact post mitigation: 1-5% of EBIT |
||||
| ACUTE PHYSICAL Flood (coastal, uvial, pluvial, groundwater) |
Physical | <2°C 4°C |
|||||
| DETAIL Increased extreme rainfall could lead to ash ooding and increased uvial ooding. Specic considerations made in relation to pluvial ooding at key distribution locations in both the UK and US MITIGATION – Showrooms are generally leased for <10 years, so this has not been identied as a material 'stranded assets' risk linked to gradual sea-level rise – As leases expire, we carry out case-by-case reviews and have the option of relocating showrooms to areas with less risk – Risk assessments carried out at key distribution locations indicated a low risk with supplier ability to send products directly to showrooms if required |
Magnitude of impact post mitigation: Minor |
Likelihood of impact post mitigation: Likely |
Financial impact post mitigation: 1-5% of EBIT |
||||
| CHRONIC PHYSICAL Changing temperature |
Physical | <2°C 4°C |
|||||
| DETAIL A changing climate and extreme weather events are likely to increase energy consumption associated with heating and cooling. There is also an increased risk of energy blackouts. MITIGATION – Continued engagement with landlords to ensure the most up to date and efcient energy processes are in place – The installation of new EnOS™ technology to regulate energy consumption in our most energy intensive UK and US sites – Investment in the most efcient and reliable HVAC systems which are regularly serviced and automatically switch off when colleagues leave the premises at night – On-site solar energy generation at our UK Carlton Park Support Centre for FY26 |
Magnitude of impact post mitigation: Negligible |
Likelihood of impact post mitigation: Moderate |
Financial impact post mitigation: <1% EBIT |
||||
| – Uninterruptable power supplies are in place in key sites to allow computers to |
keep running if energy ow is disrupted, along with battery storage solutions
| Risk | Time horizon | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Risk type | Scenario | Short | Medium | Long | |||
| LEGISLATIVE Cost of non-compliance with environmental legislation Adaptation and mitigation activities |
Transition | n/a | |||||
| DETAIL Under a transition to a low-carbon economy, we expect to see increased-level and stringency of environmental legislation across regions that the Group operate. Failure to properly comply with this legislation could lead to potential nes for the Group. |
Magnitude of impact post mitigation: Negligible |
Likelihood of impact post mitigation: Unlikely |
Financial impact post mitigation: <1% EBIT |
||||
| MITIGATION – An experienced Head of Sustainability and ESG is in place, supported by a strong governance structure, external consultants and digital platforms to understand and ensure compliance with environmental legislation |
|||||||
| – There would be signicant costs associated with non-compliance, however, identied regulatory requirements are closely monitored and supported by strong governance processes. External expertise and guidance is also used as required when opening showrooms in new jurisdictions |
|||||||
| – AI technology is also used to monitor environmental legislation and to highlight gaps in the Group's business strategy and reporting for timely consideration and action through our governance structure |
|||||||
| LEGISLATIVE Cost of compliance with environmental legislation |
Transition | n/a | |||||
| DETAIL Under a transition to a low-carbon economy, we expect to see increased-level and stringency of environmental legislation across regions that the Group operate. Ensuring the Group continues to meet requirements of environmental legislation could lead to additional costs associated with preparing information and reporting against requirements. |
Magnitude of impact post mitigation: Negligible |
Likelihood of impact post mitigation: Likely |
Financial impact post mitigation: <1% EBIT |
||||
| MITIGATION – Governance structures are in place to assess the cost of compliance with environmental legislation and ensure it is factored into the Group budgeting cycles where necessary |
|||||||
| – While the Group considers compliance with environmental legislation non-negotiable, in FY25 we strengthened our procurement function and invested in a new AI powered supply chain management system to ensure that we partner with suppliers that align with, and adhere to, our Supplier Sustainability Standards |
| Risk | Time horizon | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Risk type | category | Scenario | Short | Medium | Long | ||
| ACUTE PHYSICAL | Physical | <2°C | |||||
| Extreme heat | 4°C | ||||||
| Logistics Hub, Memphis, Tennessee (third-party) | |||||||
| DETAIL | Magnitude | Likelihood | Financial | ||||
| A changing climate and extreme weather events such as heatwaves have the potential to affect to logistics hubs. |
of impact post mitigation: |
of impact post mitigation: |
impact post mitigation: |
||||
| MITIGATION | Negligible | Likely | <1% EBIT | ||||
| – Flexibility and ability to switch logistics partners with ease where necessary is built into our BCP |
|||||||
| – Delays at third-party distribution centres would not have a signicant impact on our operations, due to the nature of the products we sell and strong client relationships and engagement strategies |
|||||||
| – This third-party site has implemented multiple mitigation actions to protect workers affected by extreme heat and limit disruption. This includes tower fans, water fountains, ice machines and the frequent distribution of water to keep workers cool and hydrated |
|||||||
| – Their facility has been constructed to withstand extreme heat and maintain a constant working temperature of 10-27°C. The hub also has the exibility to transfer items between buildings to ensure the continuity of deliveries |
|||||||
| REPUTATION Expectations for preparedness and responsible conduct from stakeholders, including investors, lenders and clients |
Transition | 1.5°C 4°C |
|||||
| DETAIL | Magnitude of | Likelihood | Financial | ||||
| Expectations for preparedness and responsible conduct from stakeholders, including investors, lenders and clients. |
impact post |
of impact post |
impact post |
||||
| MITIGATION | mitigation: Negligible |
mitigation: Likely |
mitigation: <1% EBIT |
||||
| – Supplier partners must agree with the terms of our Vendor Code of Conduct, or have a publicly available equivalent, which includes compliance with all law and legislation |
|||||||
| – In FY25 we updated our Supplier Sustainability Standards to support climate resilience and reporting. Suppliers are now expected to report emissions data and assess the impact, and potential impact, of extreme weather events on their ability to deliver on contractual obligations over the short, medium and long-term. This information is collated for review using AI |
|||||||
| – We conduct third-party on-site audits to help us to safeguard the integrity and reputation of our business operation and partnerships, and in FY25 we updated our Vendor Code of Conduct to require suppliers to carry out regular audits of third-party manufacturing sites |
|||||||
| – We aim to achieve full traceability and highlight the sustainable |
– We continue to invest in our repairs and pre-owned businesses to help keep more products in circulation and avoid negative impacts caused by mining and manufacturing processes
attributes of the products we sell and services we offer
While we recognise the importance of the above risks, the opportunities presented through adaption to a low-carbon economy are also signicant. Key opportunities identied during our qualitative CSA are detailed below:
| Time horizon | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Opportunity | Risk category | Type | Short | Medium | Long | ||||
| DOWNSTREAM Promoting the prolonged lifetime of watches and jewellery to encourage clients to retain and repair watches and jewellery instead of disposing of them |
High Transition |
Products and services |
|||||||
| DETAIL Marketing to retain and repair products instead of disposing of them. |
Financial planning considerations 10-20% of EBIT |
Strategy to realise opportunity – Delivered rst dedicated marketing campaign for pre-owned watches in the UK in FY25. The message 'We Buy, We Sell, We Exchange' was promoted across performance marketing, social media, via emails, CRM and in-store marketing |
|||||||
| – In the US we promote our pre-owned offering through Hodinkee and the brand Analog:Shift which has its own dedicated website, shop-in-shops and displays in showrooms. Awareness is created through all marketing channels – Showrooms have dedicated space and displays for pre-owned, as well as on all our websites – Regular pre-owned events are held with clients to educate them about our pre-owned service |
|||||||||
| – In FY25, we ran a series of editorial articles to promote awareness of our UK repairs and servicing |
|||||||||
| – A dedicated CRM programme reminds clients to service their watches at the recommended time |
|||||||||
| – We use a variety of channels, including educational institutions, to actively recruit talented individuals to join our team of highly skilled and accredited watchmakers to work in our repairs and servicing centres |
|||||||||
| – We continue to support new watchmakers through apprenticeships and sponsorships, including through our partnership with the AHCI |
|||||||||
| – We have invested in training and facilities to provide additional repairs and servicing support for strategic brand partners |
|||||||||
| DIRECT OPERATIONS Energy efciency in showrooms, ofces and distribution centres and use of renewable energy in showrooms and ofces |
High Transition |
Energy source and resource efciency |
|||||||
| DETAIL Use of lower-emission sources of energy. Reduction in energy use. |
Financial planning considerations <1% of EBIT |
Strategy to realise opportunity guarantees of origin |
– In line with our energy strategy, 100% of Properties are now powered by renewable electricity with renewable energy certicates, backed by |
||||||
| – 96% of properties across our Group use LED lighting and this is standard in all new properties |
|||||||||
| – A solar panel installation on our Carlton Park Support Centre is set to be completed in August 2025. It will generate renewable energy on-site and reduce energy costs by over £15,000 per annum |
|||||||||
| SUPPLY CHAIN Proactive collaboration with suppliers to reduce energy |
High Transition |
Resource efciency |
|||||||
| Financial planning Strategy to realise opportunity DETAIL Reduction in energy use. considerations – In FY25, we engaged with suppliers to identify the most energy intensive <1% of EBIT areas of our business and carried out a ten-site trial of a new energy management system. In FY26 we will roll out this EnOS™ technology in our most energy intensive sites which will reduce consumption by an estimated |
12-20% across our portfolio over a three-year period

The Group denes risk as uncertainty around the ability to achieve its objectives and execute its strategy effectively. We consider climate change as a principal risk to better manage associated risks and opportunities.
The Group has embedded a robust risk management process across all principal risks which is outlined on page 145. The risk management process is led by the Director of Audit & Risk, reporting key risks and mitigations to the Board's Audit & Risk Committee. Our risk management framework helps identify, assess, manage and monitor risks to within the risk appetite set by the Board, while taking advantage of opportunities as they are presented. Identied risks are incorporated into our Group risk register and risks that are classied as major or severe are escalated to the Board, whereas minor and moderate risks are handled by the appropriate Committee or risk owners. Management is responsible for minimising any adverse exposure to the Group and its stakeholders.
To identify and assess climate-related risks within our business operation, we conducted both qualitative and qualitative CSAs and the results are reported within the Strategy section of our TCFD disclosure. The classication of climate risks identied is outlined in the strategy section of our disclosure and is in line with the Group's risk register, with the materiality of each risk being considered. Our climate risks and opportunities sit within detailed risk classication frameworks with nancial boundaries. Further details can be found on page 153.
To help us identify, manage and mitigate climate-related supply chain risks, we used recognised reporting frameworks to carry out mapping exercises, followed by a CSA in key locations. This is supported by a series of workshops with internal and external stakeholders to explore our ndings and collaborate on any necessary mitigations. In FY26, we will conduct a CSA on our Roberto Coin Inc. business.
Climate risks are monitored on an ongoing basis, which allows us to capture any changes and adapt uidly. Risks identied through CSA are mapped to metrics, which allow us to track our progress managing these risks. Metrics are assigned responsible data owners to monitor them in line with our strategy and risk management process. Further information on risk-related metrics and targets can be found in the below Metrics and Targets section.
As a result of our analysis, we have enhanced our business processes, for example, we assess climate-related risks when negotiating leases, and during our procurement process we ask suppliers to set carbon reduction targets and encourage them to align with the objectives of the Paris Climate Agreement, to limit global warming to 1.5°C.
As a result of a CDP gap analysis, we worked with third-party consultants to explore carbon pricing, including setting an internal carbon price covering our operational activities. The exercise resulted in the decision to not introduce this mechanism.
The Group is committed to achieving net-zero GHG emissions by 2050 and our near-term emissions reduction target has been validated by the SBTi. The Scope 3 categories included in our science-based target are disclosed on page 130.
| Public commitments | Near-term SBTs aligned to 1.5°C under Paris Climate Agreement |
Net-zero |
|---|---|---|
| Scope 1 and 2 | 50% (location-based) reduction in absolute emissions by 2030 from a FY20 base year |
2050 |
| Scope 3 | 42% reduction in absolute emissions by 2030 from a FY20 base year |

We have implemented several emission reduction initiatives across our operations and value chain as part of our strategy to achieve net-zero GHG emissions by 2050, which are reported on pages 104 to 106 of this report.
Our existing loan facility is aligned with our near-term science-based emission reduction trajectory and circularity goals, which is supported by our Bonus Underpin and a colleague incentive. For more information about remuneration and our sustainability goals, please see page 187.
Due to business growth, during FY24 our emissions did not reduce in line with our Scope 1 and 2 reduction target trajectory. As well as implementing new emissions reduction initiatives in FY25, we carried out a feasibility study to understand whether switching from a location-based method to a market-based method in FY26 would better support our emissions reduction strategy.
This study showed that switching to a market-based method would necessitate a more ambitious near-term Scope 1 and 2 target of 71% by 2030 from a FY20 baseline, due to the SBTi applying forward looking ambition (FLA) adjustments to ensure new targets have not already been largely achieved. The near-term Scope 3 target would remain the same at 42%.
A SBTi re-submission process will be followed in FY26 proposing a new market-based near-term target as well as a new long-term target to reduce absolute Scope 1, 2 and 3 emissions by 90% by FY50 from a FY20 baseline. The Group will aim to offset the residual 10% of emissions through permanent removal and storage of carbon to achieve net-zero emissions.
The Group responded to the 2024 CDP questionnaire on climate change for the third consecutive year and we achieved our ambition to maintain our B 'Management' score. We continue to review our performance and build further areas of improvement into our ESG Strategy, which includes having a net-zero target approved by the SBTi and evidencing a strategic Climate Transition Plan which is aligned with the requirements of the TPT.
The below table summarises metrics used to monitor our operational risks going forward:
| Risk | Scope | Metrics to monitor risks | Targets to monitor risks | FY23 | FY24 | FY25 | YoY change |
YoY trend |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Extreme weather events disrupting ofces and distribution centres |
Group | Strategic sites reviewed and appropriate contingency plans in place until lease expiry |
All properties reviewed for exposure to extreme weather events |
43% | 38% | 50% | +12% | |
| Increased energy requirements |
Group | % of electricity from renewable sources |
Transition to 100% renewable energy wherever possible (including landlord energy supplies) by 2025 |
77% | 70% | 100% | +30% | |
| Group | Number of properties we control tted with LED lighting |
Transition to 100% LEDs in properties we control and where installation is nancially and practically viable by 2025 |
84% | 81% | 96% | +15% | ||
| Changing consumer preferences |
Group | Number of product repairs, servicing and sales of pre-owned watches as a percentage of the number of new watch sales |
Year-on-year increase in watches kept in circulation through repair, servicing and/or resale, measured by % of new watches sold |
44% | 46% | 45% | (1)%* | |
| Engagement with brand partners and other suppliers |
50% of product suppliers aligned with relevant, well-recognised sustainability standards or certications by 2025 |
35% | 44% | 46% | +2% | |||
| % of own brand packaging recyclable | Own brand packaging fully recyclable by 2030 |
71% | 71% | 71% | – | |||
| Extreme weather events disrupting ofces and distribution centres |
Group | Monitoring the cost of extreme weather damage across sites on an annual basis |
Annual assessment of costs associated with the reinsurance of ofces and distribution centres |
Complete | Complete | Complete | – | |
| Raw material extraction (minerals and agriculture) disrupted |
Group | Keeping watches in circulation through repairs, servicing and our pre-owned business as % of new watches sold |
Year-on-year increase in watches kept in circulation through repair, servicing and/or resale, measured by % of new watches sold |
44% | 46% | 45% | (1)% | |
| Carbon price introduced | Group | Annual reduction in Scope 1, 2 and 3 intensity metrics** |
50% reduction in Scope 1 and 2 emissions by 2030 from a FY20 baseline |
0.0025 | 0.0026 | 0.0026 | – | |
| 42% reduction in Scope 3 emissions by 2030 from a FY20 baseline |
0.1100 | 0.1479 | 0.1676 | +0.0195 |
Key Increase No change Missed target
* Sales of pre-owned watches increased 39% year-on-year. For more information see page 111.
** tCO2 e per £'000 revenue. For more information on our emissions see page 130.
The timeline below summarises progress and key steps taken by the Group to ensure potential climate-related risks and opportunities are identied and managed in a structured, transparent and measurable way:
| FY25 FY24** |
FY20 baseline** | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UK | Europe | US | Total | UK | Europe | US | Total | UK | US | Total |
| 193 | – | 59 | 252 | 162 | – | 85 | 247 | 264 | 78 | 342 |
| 2,293 | 19 | 1,796 | 4,108 | 2,194 | 29 | 1,844 | 4,067 | 2,344 | 1,529 | 3,873 |
| – | – | – | – | – | 33 | 1,574 | 1,607 | 3,181 | 1,666 | 4,847 |
| 2,486 | 19 | 1,855 | 4,360 | 2,356 | 29 | 1,929 | 4,314 | 2,608 | 1,607 | 4,215 |
| 193 | – | 59 | 252 | 162 | 34 | 1,659 | 1,855 | 3,445 | 1,743 | 5,188 |
| 11,489,198 | 16,936,256 | 11,144,098 | 264,590 | 5,285,657 | 16,694,345 | 10,281,037 | 4,233,339 | 14,514,376 | ||
| 124,406 | 626 | 120,219 | 245,251 | 106,933 | 1,086 | 109,233 | 217,252 | 63,373 | 39,639 | 103,012 |
| 8,709 | – | 13,376 | 22,085 | 15,214 | 587 | 6,920 | 22,721 | 6,552 | 4,594 | 11,146 |
| 684 | 8 | 433 | 1,125 | 744 | 16 | 435 | 1,195 | 606 | 411 | 1,017 |
| 786 | 6 | 1,778 | 2,570 | 781 | 10 | 1,622 | 2,413 | 704 | 1,650 | 2,354 |
| 12 | – | 2 | 14 | 8 | – | 2 | 10 | 7 | – | 7 |
| 1,700 | 2,433 | 1,265 | ||||||||
| 3,104 | 41 | 933 | 4,078 | 1,845 | 918 | 121 | 2,884 | 1,318 | 528 | 1,846 |
| 10 | 6 | 1 | ||||||||
| 14 | – | 4 | 18 | 107 | 32 | 1 | 140 | 70 | 6 | 76 |
| 276,851 | 249,054 | 120,724 | ||||||||
| 281,211 | 253,368 | 124,939 | ||||||||
| 277,103 | 250,909 | 125,913 | ||||||||
| Scope 1: Direct combustion from owned and controlled Scope 2: Indirect emissions from the generation of purchased Category 4 – Upstream transportation and distribution (4) Category 12 – End-of-life treatment of sold products (9) |
174,752 5,272,306 |
| FY25 | FY24** | FY20 baseline** | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Emission intensities | UK and Europe | US | Total | UK and Europe | US | Total | UK | US | Total |
| Revenue (£'000) | 865,874 | 785,627 | 1,651,501 | 846,043 | 838,360 | 1,684,403 | 585,473 | 292,346 | 877,819 |
| Scope 1 and 2 Intensity ratio (tCO2e per £'000 revenue) |
0.0029 | 0.0024 | 0.0026 | 0.0028 | 0.0023 | 0.0026 | 0.0045 | 0.0055 | 0.0048 |
| Scope 3 Intensity ratio (tCO2e per £'000 revenue)* |
0.1676 | 0.1479 | 0.1375 | ||||||
| Total Emissions Intensity ratio (tCO2e per £'000 revenue)* |
0.1703 | 0.1504 | 0.1423 | ||||||
* Calculated as Group gure.
** The FY24 and FY20 gures have been rebaselined as detailed on the next page.
The Group's approach to calculating and reporting its Greenhouse Gas (GHG) emissions follows the WRI.WBCSD GHG Protocol Corporate Accounting and Reporting Standards (Revised) on how to measure and monitor GHG emissions.
The Group uses six external data sources for emissions factors, being:
All Scope 3 emission calculations follow the guidelines and methodologies that are outlined in the Greenhouse Gas Protocol. The Greenhouse Gas Protocol is the most widely used greenhouse gas accounting standard. It provides a framework for businesses and governments to measure and report their greenhouse gas emissions.
For US operations, emission factors from the International Energy Agency have also been used for the estimation of emissions relating to T&D losses.
See below more information regarding the methodology and data sources that were used for the Scope 3 calculations:
The Scope 1, 2 and 3 emissions and energy consumption data for FY25, and the restated data for FY24 and FY20, have been independently assured through a limited assurance engagement, conducted in accordance with International Standard on Assurance Engagements (ISAE) 3410 'Assurance Engagements on Greenhouse Gas', by BDO LLP.
Our FY25 emissions have been restated in line with our Rebaselining Policy.
The baseline for our metrics is FY20. In line with the Greenhouse Gas Protocol, to ensure fair comparison over time, the Group will rebaseline previously reported gures in subsequent annual reporting, when a material change occurs due to:
The Group denes a material difference, which would trigger a rebaselining exercise, as one resulting in a variance of greater than or equal to 5%.
During FY25, our reported Scope 1 and 2, plus Scope 3 Categories 1, 2, 3, 4, 6 and 7 emissions for FY24 and FY20 were restated to reect the change to our inventory boundary. In an effort to use the most up to date emission factors, emissions calculated using a spend-based emission factor in were restated with the latest updates from CEDA (being version 7 for FY24 and version 6 for FY20.



We are committed to making sure our supply chain operates responsibly and that everyone we do business with respects and protects the lives of workers, their communities and the planet.
During the year, we continued to evolve our responsible sourcing standards and were delighted to see an increasing number of brand partners and other suppliers share sustainability strategies, including Rolex, who released their rst Sustainability Report.
We want to give our clients the peace of mind that everything they buy from us is responsibly and ethically sourced, while making it easier for them to choose more sustainable pieces that reect individual values and lifestyles.

WE ADVOCATE FOR OUR INDUSTRY By proactively promoting the interests and responsibilities of the luxury watch and jewellery sectors in our markets

WE EARN TRUST & CONFIDENCE
By being true to ourselves and honest and transparent with our colleagues, our clients and our brand partners
cultivate a secure and supportive workplace, with equal opportunities and respect

The Group is committed to conducting all business in a fair, transparent, socially responsible and environmentally sustainable way. We expect the same high standards from brand partners and other suppliers throughout our value chain.

With sustainability becoming increasingly important to consumers, we want to make it easier for clients to choose products that reect individual values and lifestyles, by improving the traceability of raw materials, growing our range of lower carbon products with veriable social and environmental attributes, highlighting innovation in R&D, and promoting the longevity value of high-quality watches and jewellery.
In September 2024, we recruited a new Head of Procurement who is working closely with our internal teams and suppliers, to secure the best possible value in terms of cost and quality, while helping to minimise risk by validating that we are working with suppliers who share our social and environmental principles and adhere to our sustainability standards.
Building an ethical and responsible supply chain is the right thing to do for a better future. Aligning and ensuring higher social standards in particular, contributes to building trust, resilience and stability which drives innovation, performance and creativity."
ERIC MACAIRE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, GLOBAL BUYING AND MERCHANDISING

In FY25, we partnered with approximately 1,600 Tier 1 suppliers*, including approximately 115 watch and jewellery brands and suppliers worldwide.
We acknowledge a risk of human rights violations within our supply chain tiers, particularly in the lower tiers where raw materials are sourced and processed. There is also the potential for negative environmental impacts resulting from raw materials extraction and mining processes, as well as deforestation, water pollution and high energy use.
The Group operates in countries where high social standards apply and takes steps to ensure it partners with reputable suppliers. We exercise due diligence in all our interactions and strive to go beyond basic risk management and compliance to implement environmental, social and governance considerations into our decision-making processes at every level.
A review of our sourcing function in FY24 identied opportunities to achieve greater value for money, strengthen supply chain due diligence, encourage competition and innovation, and enhance collaborative working.
Since the appointment of our new Head of Procurement, we have implemented a number of improvements to help realise these opportunities, including a new Procurement Policy ('Policy'), which was approved by the ESG Committee in March 2025.
This Policy standardises our approach to ensuring that the products we sell and services we use support business objectives and meet our environmental and social standards and performance criteria. It is supported by procedures detailing the steps colleagues must take in order to establish relationships with suppliers who understand our business goals, offer quality and value, and who are willing to help achieve shared goals.
Other improvements to our onboarding process include enhanced data capture, supplier screening and tendering protocols. We are already beneting operationally and nancially from these enhancements and plan to further improve in FY26 with the implementation of a dedicated procurement platform and contract management system to improve efciency, secure data and support our transition towards a paperless workplace.
43% Product and packaging suppliers* report using recycled or reclaimed materials in their products or packaging
Our Vendor Code of Conduct sets out our minimum requirements across human rights, labour, environment, anti-corruption, integrity, business ethics, data security and social impact, which must be applied in addition to compliance with all relevant national and international laws and legislation.
All active suppliers must read, sign and adhere to our Vendor Code of Conduct or publish an equivalent commitment which embeds basic business ethics principles, including adherence to local and national laws and regulations, specically laws related to business ethics, responsible sourcing, human rights and environmental responsibilities.
Colleagues with a responsibility for sourcing, as well as other relevant colleagues, receive training to equip them with the knowledge and skills they need to uphold our requirements when engaging with suppliers and supplier screening.
We review our Vendor Code of Conduct on an annual basis to ensure it remains relevant to our business and continues to reect best industry practices. Following a review in March 2025, our ESG Committee approved additional requirements, including the visibility of key environmental data to support emissions reduction goals.
Compliance with our Vendor Code of Conduct is further supported by our third-party factory audit schedule. Anyone with genuine suspicions about the contravention of our terms is encouraged to report their concerns through our condential global whistleblowing process, which uses an independent reporting facility and is available in multiple languages.
Our Supplier Sustainability Standards supplement our Vendor Code of Conduct and provide comprehensive guidance in relation to the common practices we expect throughout our global supply chain and in all our dealings.
Early in 2025, we reviewed our ESG Partner Standards to ensure they continue to support business objectives, evolve with best industry practices and resonate with relevant stakeholders.
Key content updates include guidance on data protection and cyber security, modern slavery, laboratory grown diamonds, coloured gemstones and green claims, as well as alignment with updated Group policies and the inclusion of links to useful resources.
These Standards were approved by the ESG Committee in March 2025 and are publicly available on our corporate website at thewosgroupplc.com. They are regularly reviewed and issued to all existing and potential suppliers.
Earning stakeholder trust by 'doing the right thing, always' is key to building client loyalty, brand reputation and longterm success, and is the driving force behind our ESG strategy."
* Suppliers over £50,000 spend in FY25.
Compliance with our Supplier Sustainability Standards is supported by agentic AI, congured to assess a supplier's level of alignment with our requirements and expectations.
In March 2025, our project to leverage AI to enhance our ESG reporting and due diligence culminated in the delivery of an AI Agent with the ability to cross check our supplier database with publicly available information. This supplier screening allows us to get an instant understanding of a supplier's ESG maturity and provides direct links to primary information sources such as individual supplier websites, annual reports and polices.
As well as helping us to gain a more accurate understanding of our supply chain and identify areas for further engagement and improvement, this technology allows us to learn from supplier initiatives, for example, innovation in Research and Design, the promotion of human rights and preparedness for a changing climate.
Compliance with our Supplier Sustainability Standards is supported by AI Agent technology, congured to assess a supplier's level of alignment with our requirements and expectations."
Understanding the environmental and social impact of the products we sell and services we use is a growing area of focus for the Group.
Ongoing engagement with brand partners and other suppliers is key to achieving our sustainability goals and addressing areas of public concern, such as the providence of precious metals, diamonds and gemstones, and protecting nature and biodiversity.
As part of our sustainability assessment approach, we collect key data from suppliers and actively seek opportunities for collaborative working to improve performance. Our Supplier Sustainability Standards set out our goals and provide comprehensive information to help engage suppliers with the actions needed throughout our value chain to achieve them.
We are committed to continuous improvement in supply chain engagement and in FY26, we aim to; increase the number of suppliers who will be subject to sustainability risk assessments; participate in industry working groups; and multi-stakeholder initiatives to promote sector-wide responsible sourcing practices, and launch a revised Supplier Manual detailing operational processes and procedures.
We continue to strongly encourage brand partners and other suppliers to align with relevant, well-recognised sustainability standards and certications.
For watch and jewellery manufacturers, we promote membership of the Responsible Jewellery Council (RJC). In 2024, the RJC expanded its membership provisions to place an increased focus on human rights due diligence, grievance mechanisms, supply chain due diligence, claims and GHG emissions.
At the time of this report, 47% of our watch and jewellery suppliers are accredited members of the RJC and, as such, are subject to rigorous independent audits to ensure compliance with their standards.
These RJC audits are in addition to our own third-party audit schedules which we carry out as part of our supply chain due diligence.
46% All suppliers* publicly report holding at least one relevant sustainability certication

We remain committed to ensuring nobody involved in the production, distribution or sale of our products, or delivery of our services, is a victim of any form of modern slavery or any other form of human rights violation, and have measures in place to identify, assess and mitigate potential labour and human rights abuses across our value chain. This includes a commitment to protect women's rights across our operations and supply chain.
Our Human Rights Policy was reviewed and approved by the Board in October 2024, and applies to all global business activities and everyone who works for us, and everyone we do business with.
Our Vendor Code of Conduct includes specic requirements founded on the conventions of the ILO, which are guided by international human rights principles and encompassed by the Universal Declaration of Human Rights.
We continue to partner with Slave-Free Alliance (SFA), who provide expert support by reviewing and assisting in the development of our policies, processes and practices, which include forced labour risk assessments and specialist training.
In September 2024, we launched a new e-learning module, which is available to all colleagues through our Learning Hub and is mandatory for colleagues with a responsibility for sourcing. This training is designed to break down the common preconceptions and misconceptions of modern slavery, while equipping colleagues with the knowledge and skills they need to recognise any signs that might suggest exploitation is taking place and how to deal with concerns.
In addition, in March 2025, SFA delivered an in-depth face-to-face digital workshop for key colleagues working in our highest risk business areas, to further engage them with the steps we can take to cease, eliminate and mitigate human rights risks in our supply chains. Also in March, our Supplier Sustainability Standards were updated to include more information on our expectations in relation to modern slavery and human trafcking within our supply chain.
No violations in relation to human rights within our Group or extended value chains have been reported through our reporting processes and procedures in FY25, however, we remain vigilant and committed to seeking out any such disclosures, through awareness raising and facilitating condential reporting and whistleblowing mechanisms.
In FY26, we will work with SFA to review our framework for handling disclosures with the aim of strengthening our escalation process.
In line with the requirements of the UK Modern Slavery Act 2015, the Group is committed to continuous review of human rights and modern slavery mitigations within our business and supply chain and our mitigations are reported in our annual Modern Slavery Transparency Statement, available at thewosgroupplc.com.
We have a duty of care to ensure our supply chain operates responsibly and that everyone we do business with respects and protects the lives of workers, their communities and the environment.
To monitor our supply chain performance and manage compliance with our standards, colleagues with a responsibility for sourcing are trained to assess social and environmental risks and work collaboratively to address areas for improvement.
Throughout FY25, we continued to partner with EcoVadis to support supply chain transparency and due diligence. The EcoVadis IQ technology maps sustainability risks within supply chains using smart automation and analytics, with risks calculated using factors such as the type of goods or service supplied, geographic location, and criticality to our business and reputation.
For FY26, we are transitioning to a new supply chain management system, which deploys AI agents to retrieve and assimilate publicly available information and is customised to assess the level of supplier alignment with our Supplier Sustainability Standards. Scores relative to the level of performance against multiple indicators are automatically calculated and areas for further engagement and improvement are highlighted. Direct links to the supplier's own information sources allow for further analysis and support our audit process.
Our new system supports bespoke business needs and can save supplier time on questionnaire processes. To support this method of data collection and transparency, we ask suppliers to publicly report relevant information where possible. Other benets of this system include supplier entity mapping, fast access to entity information including websites and VAT numbers, and a supplier record depository.
We continue to encourage supplier partners to participate in an EcoVadis sustainability assessment, or an equivalent, in line with our goal to partner with suppliers who hold, or are aligned with, relevant, well-recognised sustainability standards and certications.
To monitor our supply chain performance and manage compliance with our standards, colleagues with a responsibility for sourcing are trained to assess social and environmental risks and work collaboratively to address areas for improvement."
We want to build strong, long-term relationships with all supplier partners, and will always collaborate to resolve issues wherever possible. However, if we nd evidence of a serious breach of our terms, we will not hesitate to terminate our contract and, if necessary, notify the relevant authorities.
Suppliers considered 'High Risk' in our screening will be asked to present evidence to support compliance with our terms. This can include a valid third-party audit report, supported by any completed corrective action plans.
If this evidence is unavailable or considered unsatisfactory, we will conduct our own on-site audit. On-site audits are carried out by specialist, independent, third-party auditors who hold an ISO 17020 certication for social audit services and have expert knowledge of local laws and practices.
As an added precaution, in March 2025, our ESG Committee approved an update to our Vendor Code of Conduct requiring suppliers to carry out regular audits of their third-party manufacturing sites.
Historically, jewellery suppliers present a higher risk prole, therefore, during the year, we audited 29% of our jewellery suppliers by turnover and implemented seven corrective action plans. A further jewellery supplier was delisted after our request for an audit was rejected.
| Facilities audited |
After corrective action |
|
|---|---|---|
| Total factories audited | 8 | – |
| Low risk | 2 | 4 |
| Intermediate risk | – | 1 |
| High risk | 1 | 1 |
| Critical risk | 6 | – |
| Corrective action plans completed | 7 | – |
| Delisted/not approved | 1 | 2 |
Our commitment to upholding high standards was demonstrated in November 2024 when we ceased trading with a signicant jewellery supplier after they failed to resolve critical risks within our 30-day corrective action period. On re-audit, we found a repeated failure to clarify the origin of precious metals used in the products they supplied to us, and irregularities in payment records. The supplier was promptly notied of our decision, and this was communicated to colleagues so they could take the appropriate action.

* Over £100,000 spend in FY25. ** Over £500,000 spend in FY25. Human Rights Policy
16% Product suppliers** report carrying out ethical or social audits of their suppliers
We encourage innovation in products and packaging, supported by training and resources to help drive client engagement with advancements in eco-design."
We continue to seek and strengthen relationships with suppliers who invest in R&D to introduce new materials, processes and practices with a lower environmental impact, and/or supply products and services that promote social and economic sustainability.
Our brand partners continue to pioneer sustainable techniques and materials, resulting in unique points of difference, such as Tissot's Lightmaster Solar Quartz movement, which can recharge using both natural and articial light, and Oris's Aquis date Calibre 400 Upcycle 43.50mm, featuring unique dials made from recycled PET plastic.
We encourage innovation in products and packaging, supported by training and resources to help drive client engagement with advancements in eco-design.
To mark Earth Day in April 2025, we promoted brands with sustainable attributes, along with a reminder of Certied Pre-Owned options as a lowercarbon option.
The Group is committed to ethical marketing and advertising practices, which includes a clear, accurate and honest representation of our products, respect for cultural sensitivity and diversity, and the responsible use of personal data.
We recognise product disclosure is an important aspect of consumer protection and fair business practice, as it demonstrates transparency and helps build trust.
Our Supplier Sustainability Standards detail our requirement for supplier partners to comply with internationally accepted standards and existing obligations under consumer protection law and safety legislation. In addition, in line with our goal to help clients make more informed purchasing decisions and protect them from any negative consequences or disappointment, supplier partners are asked to provide detailed, accurate information about a product's features, origins and materials, as well as any potential health and safety risks.
Claims about the environmental aspects or performance of products must be substantiated using robust and veriable methods and we take a zero-tolerance approach to misleading product representation.


886 from The Royal Mint is a contemporary collection of jewellery made from responsibly sourced precious metals, predominantly from recovered and recycled sources.
In July 2024, sourcing and sustainability colleagues visited The Royal Mint's pioneering new Precious Metals Recovery Plant, which is providing a more sustainable source of high purity gold and reducing reliance on traditional mining activity.
The Royal Mint has a history spanning over 1,100 years and it has recently mastered 'urban mining' and developed world-leading chemistry to extract tiny amounts of 24ct gold and other precious metals from e-waste, including old circuit boards, which are used to create the highest quality bracelets, earrings and necklaces.
To mark their 250th anniversary, our Mappin & Webb business has partnered with the Royal Mint to introduce a unisex 18ct yellow gold collection. The 15-piece collection is expertly crafted from reclaimed gold and supports our commitment to circularity and offering clients fully traceable ne jewellery.
The Royal Mint are combining gold recovered from discarded electronics, with centuries of craftsmanship to create the nest quality jewellery with a fascinating sustainability story.
Photo courtesy of Gemelds

In support of our goal to improve traceability and sourcing standards, in March 2025, we partnered with Gemelds to launch a new emerald capsule collection in our Goldsmiths business.
Gemelds is a world-leading responsible miner and marketer of coloured gemstones, and the majority-owner and operator of the Kagem emerald mine in Zambia, which is believed to be the world's single largest producing emerald mine. Gemelds champions industry-leading policies and practices across its operations and funds projects to improve health, education and livelihoods in the communities around its mines in Africa.
Knowing where our diamonds come from allows us to reassure clients that they are authentic and ethically sourced.
All suppliers of diamonds, or jewellery incorporating diamonds, must comply with the Kimberley Process Certication Scheme, as well as all laws in relation to this scheme and the World Diamond Council System of Warranties Assurance (WDC SoW).
Any diamonds supplied to us must be conict-free and accompanied by written guarantees in line with WDC SoW Assurance. We will not accept an invoice without this statement. Once a diamond is imported and ready for trade, we also require a WDC SoW Assurance statement on every invoice for rough diamonds, polished diamonds, or diamond jewellery, through to the nal invoice to clients.
Records of warranty invoices received, as well as invoices issued when buying or selling diamonds, are regularly audited and reconciled.
In FY26, we are launching the Goldsmiths Signature Diamond featuring DTC diamonds and TracrTM technology, as part of our new engagement and diamond jewellery collection.
TracrTM, developed by the De Beers Group, is the industry's rst scalable blockchain platform that provides a traceable and tamper-proof record of a diamond's provenance, from mine to nger. Each diamond is individually registered at the source and assigned a digital identity that captures key characteristics, including a 3D scan, carat weight, and origin. As the diamond moves from miner to manufacturer, these scans are compared to verify authenticity and enhance traceability, eliminating reliance on self-reported claims. Leveraging the 'Internet of Things' and AI, this data is securely recorded on the blockchain and meticulously tracked as each diamond progresses from rough to polished.
This advanced technology enhances transparency throughout the supply chain, offering our clients added condence that their diamond has been responsibly and ethically sourced.

TracrTM is a pioneering diamond traceability platform, underpinned by blockchain technology, that enables a diamond's journey to be recorded from source to showroom.
The Group complies with all relevant national and international law and legislation, which includes all UK Government sanctions and requirements, as well as those imposed by the US Department of the Treasury and its Ofce of Foreign Assets Control, and we require our suppliers to do the same.
We continue to cease trade in diamonds, coloured gemstones and precious metals such as gold, silver and platinum from sanctioned Russian sources.
In March 2025, we updated our Supplier Sustainability Standards to reinforce our requirement that any diamonds supplied to us must be accompanied by a self-certication statement declaring that they were not mined, extracted, produced or manufactured wholly or in part in the Russian Federation, notwithstanding whether such diamonds have been substantially transformed into other products outside of the Russian Federation.
We continue to see more watch and jewellery suppliers using recycled gold in their production processes. All precious metals supplied to us must demonstrate legal compliance according to all the provisions of the nancial market supervisory authority and be sourced from reneries on the London Bullion Market Association Good Delivery List or the UAE Gold Good Delivery Scheme.
We will not tolerate any harsh or inhumane treatment of animals and only buy watches through the most reputable manufacturers. All watch suppliers must provide written conrmation that any animal skins used to make straps are sourced from farmed and sustainably managed sources and conform to relevant international laws, including the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species (CITES).
We continue to grow our range of more socially and environmentally preferable product options, including watch straps made from vegan-friendly materials.
Through our Supplier Sustainability Standards, we ask supplier partners to follow the OECD Due Diligence Guidance and implement the OECD 5-Step guidance. This risk-based approach is designed to help organisations avoid contributing to conict, serious human rights impacts and nancial crime through their operations. The framework includes embedding strong management systems, identifying risks, independent third-party audits and transparency.
Our Vendor Code of Conduct and Supplier Sustainability Standards set out our expectations in relation to freedom of association and collective bargaining.
Suppliers are required to adopt an open attitude towards trade unions and their activities. It is the Group's policy that all workers, without distinction, should have the right to establish and join organisations of their own choosing and bargain collectively, without prior authorisation or interference from government or one another.
We are growing our range of more socially and environmentally preferable product options, including luxury watch straps made from vegan friendly materials."
As the laws and regulations governing businesses become ever more complex we need to ensure the judgements and decisions we make are taken with both the knowledge and application of the highest ethical principles.
The Corporate Governance Report that begins on page 156 sets out how the Board and its Committees operate and apply the provisions and principles of the Corporate Governance Code 2018 and other regulation and best practices. The Environmental, Social and Governance section which starts on page 76 provides information regarding the management of ESG issues specically and includes key performance data as well as our full TCFD disclosures.
The Watches of Switzerland Group has in place a number of policies and procedures to ensure risks from unethical conduct and illegal business practice are reduced and eliminated as far as possible. These underpin our Code of Ethics, which together with our Supplier Sustainability Standards, sets out the behaviours expected of our colleagues and third-parties we do business with.
Oversight of the operation of the Group's key policies in this area is the responsibility of the Board. Where requested by the Board, the Audit & Risk Committee or ESG Committee will review the adequacy and security of the arrangements in place.
Our governance framework is underpinned by our Code of Ethics which is comprised of a number of additional standalone policies covering bribery and corruption, fraud, competition law and data protection, information security and cyber security protection. Taken together these policies ensure that we operate in an open, fair and honest manner in all of our business dealings.
During the year, the Board reviewed and approved the Code of Ethics, which can be found on the corporate website thewosgroupplc.com. The Code of Ethics was further expanded to support changes made to the governance framework of the Company. This included clarication of the Company's processes and protocols when considering the use of evolving AI technology.
The Company maintains a zero-tolerance approach to all forms of corruption, including, but not limited to, bribery and fraud. Board has overall responsibility for the Anti-Bribery, Corruption & Fraud Policy, which is regularly reviewed by Senior Management and the Audit & Risk Committee. The Policy reinforces the Board's commitment to conducting the Group's business affairs to ensure that it does not engage in or facilitate any form of corruption. The aim of the Policy is to ensure compliance with applicable anti-bribery and corruption legislation and regulations and to ensure colleagues act responsibly and ethically at all times when conducting business. The Policy sets out the Group's protocols in relation to hospitality and gifts.
The Group's Company Secretary and General Counsel has day-to-day responsibility for the Policy and reports to the Chair of the Audit & Risk Committee and to the Board as required. Colleagues are required to complete mandatory e-learning covering anti-bribery, corruption and fraud risks annually. High risk locations undertake additional face-to-face training on an annual basis.
During the year, the Policy was reviewed and approved by the Board and amended to provide additional clarity and reinforcement of the Company's aversion to and strict protocols regarding fraud and the receiving and giving of gifts and hospitality.
During the year, the Audit & Risk Committee were updated on the new failure to prevent fraud legislation and the progress within the Company on preparation for the new legislation and its compliance.
The Company has rigorous processes and procedures which operate alongside an Anti-Money Laundering (AML) Policy which was reviewed by the Board during the year. The Policy enforces a strict regime in the prevention of money laundering. The Group Policy is supported by internal operational and local territory specic business policies.
We seek to build solid and constructive working relationships with all tax authorities. The Group has held the Fair Tax Mark since February 2022, and achieved reaccreditation from the Fair Tax® Foundation in March 2025. The Fair Tax Mark is the gold standard of responsible tax conduct and demonstrates that the Group pays the right amount of corporate income tax at the right time and in the right place. The Group pays corporation tax on all operations and does not operate in any tax havens or use any tax avoidance schemes.
The Board reviewed the Corporate Criminal Obligations (CCO) Policy which sets out the Group's zero-tolerance approach to tax evasion; no changes were necessary from the prior year when the Policy was introduced. The CCO Policy describes the legal framework, information and guidance on how to recognise and deal with tax evasion matters. Compliance with the Policy and disclosures arising from it are included in the annual review undertaken by the Senior Accounting Ofcer.
During the year, training was delivered to relevant colleagues, including those in support and retail, and the Directors were provided with awareness documentation, as it is recognised this is an important part of the legislation. Further information on our Tax Strategy and CCO Policy can be found at thewosgroupplc.com.
We understand the importance of maintaining good relationships with suppliers and have transparent payment terms and payment procedures to ensure prompt payment. It is Group policy to agree appropriate terms and conditions for transactions with suppliers (ranging from standard written terms to individually negotiated contracts) and for payments to be made in accordance with these terms, provided the vendor has complied with its obligations.
Our payment practices report is available at check-payment-practices. service.gov.uk/search, which showed the Group took on average 27 days to pay in the six-month period to the end of FY25.
The business operates a standard, client-facing Retail Returns Policy. The manufacturer's warranty for product varies by brand and style, however, most warranties are usually valid for two years from the date of purchase, with three years of extended warranty for certain watch brands. If a product malfunctions, or is not 't for purpose', we will, at our discretion, repair or replace as appropriate.
The Group has a responsibility to protect client and colleague personal data, and use it fairly and appropriately in line with the applicable law and regulation in each country in which we operate. We have a Group Data Protection Ofcer with responsibility for all data protection matters, and a Cyber Security Team responsible for security measures across our networks and systems. The two work closely together to ensure a joined-up, risk-based approach.
The Group's data protection framework continues to mature to meet the needs of a growing global business and evolving legal landscape. We have in place a broad range of measures designed to meet our data protection and security obligations, including policies and processes, governance and oversight measures, and mandatory annual training. Alongside this, we employ a suite of technical controls to detect and protect against known and emerging security threats. Further information on how we govern associated risks can be found on page 151. The Group has not experienced any reportable security breaches over the last three years and no nes or penalties have been incurred.
The Company is continually improving its cyber security and signicant improvements have been made during the year, including enhanced controls around passwords and access requests, increased penetration testing and social engineering simulations to minimise the risk of access exploitation.
The Company has a Group Health & Safety Policy and governance processes in place to ensure the Board is updated regularly on health and safety activities and on any accidents or incidents that occur.
Further information on the Company's health and safety activities can be found on page 84.
The Company complies with relevant legislation regarding product safety and legislation.
We continually review legislation and requirements and work with our brand partners to ensure early and ongoing compliance.
It is important for the business to have an open and transparent work culture. We aim to conduct our business with the highest standards of honesty and integrity every day. The Board has overall responsibility for this policy and the Director of Internal Audit & Risk has day-to-day operational responsibility. The Chair of the Audit & Risk Committee receives a summary of all protected whistleblowing reports for communication to the Board.
Under the Policy, whilst colleagues are encouraged to report any concerns or complaints, without fear of recrimination, the Board acknowledges there may be circumstances where internal reporting lines may not be suitable or may discourage colleagues from speaking out. We use a third-party to provide an independent reporting system. This is a global facility for colleagues to raise concerns condentially, with the option of maintaining anonymity. Colleagues are required to complete mandatory e-learning training on whistleblowing protocols annually.
The Company has a number of other Group policies, all of which can be found on its corporate website, thewosgroupplc.com.
Effective risk management is essential in supporting the delivery of the Group's strategic objectives, achieving stakeholder value and delivering long-term success."
Risks can be positive (opportunities) and negative (threats) and are a combination of the likelihood of an event and the impact of the consequence.
Risk is inherent in both the Group's operations and strategic decision-making. These risks and uncertainties could impact the delivery of strategic and operational objectives. Effective risk management helps support the successful delivery of the Group's objectives. The Board's role is central to understanding and providing oversight into how risks are being managed and addressed. The Board has established a framework of prudent and effective controls which enable risk to be assessed and managed. The Board takes responsibility for the management of risk and internal control systems throughout the business. This includes determining the nature and extent of the principal risks the Board is willing to take in achieving strategic objectives (the Board's risk appetite), and challenging management's implementation of effective systems of risk identication, assessment, prioritisation and management.
The Audit & Risk Committee, on behalf of the Board, has responsibility for maintaining oversight of the Group's framework for risk management. Whilst ultimate responsibility for the oversight of risk management rests with the Board, the effective day-to-day management of risk is embedded within the business through a layered assurance approach.
The Board recognises that risk management is an integral part of good corporate governance and management practice and to be effective, should be embedded within the organisation's culture. The Board is, therefore, committed to ensuring that risk management forms an integral part of its philosophy, practices and business plans rather than being viewed or practised as a separate programme and that responsibility for implementation is accepted at all levels of the organisation. During the year, the Board reviewed the effectiveness of the Group's risk management and internal controls systems. This review included the discussion and review of risk registers and the internal controls across all business functions, as part of an annual exercise facilitated by the Internal Audit team.

The Group's established framework for managing risks has continued to be in place across the business throughout this nancial year, with responsibility to implement the Board's policies on risk management and internal control sitting with management.

4
Summary of the key risks facing the Group, prepared through review of departmental risks identied through the bottom-up risk identication process, and the Group-level risks identied and owned by the Trading Board.
3
Manage
– Current risks: risks we are managing now that could stop us from achieving our strategic objectives.
– Emerging risks: risks with a future potential impact from external or internal opportunities or threats.
Risks are categorised into one of six categories:
Owned by individual departments and teams across the Group. These identify specic risks and mitigating controls arising from day-to-day operations.
Set out below are the key responsibilities and key activities of the various functions of the Group in relation to risk management:

– Embeds and manages internal controls and risk management processes as part of business-as-usual operations
– Provides an objective compliance and monitoring overview – Identies non-compliance with key business processes
| Provides assurance to the Audit & Risk Committee through independent reviews of agreed risk areas | ||
|---|---|---|
| --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | -- | -- |
– Ensures that principal risk topics are scheduled for regular review
Risk appetite is an expression of the amount and types of risk that the Group is willing to take to achieve its strategic and operational objectives. The Group accepts that it cannot achieve its long-term strategic objectives without being exposed to an element of risk. Understanding current and emerging risk is therefore integral to the Group's decision-making process.
The Board determines the amount of risk the Group is willing to accept in the pursuit of the Group's strategic objectives, dependent on the type of risk. In exploring risks and opportunities, we prioritise the interests and safety of our clients and colleagues and seek to protect the long-term value and reputation of the brand, while maximising commercial benets to support responsible and sustained growth.
The Group assesses the level of risk exposure against its associated risk appetite to ensure that we appropriately prioritise our resources to manage risks within our risk appetite. Where the residual risk remains outside the Board's risk tolerance, additional actions are identied to further mitigate the risk down to an acceptable target level.
The Group's risk appetite and tolerance levels were considered and approved by the Board and are reviewed annually. These are used to set tolerance limits and target risks for each of the principal risks and rene mitigation plans where appropriate.
In summary, the Board has a very low appetite for risks that could lead to breaches of legal and regulatory requirements. The Group has a low appetite for risks that could impact its reputation, for example in the areas of data management and cyber security. In contrast, the Group has a higher risk appetite in relation to business strategy, as evidenced through our growth in the UK and US markets.
This year the Group has supplemented its existing risk management processes in response to the upcoming changes in the UK Corporate Governance Code. In particular, the Group is identifying and assessing its material controls. The Group is making good progress here. The existing Code provisions remain applicable and state that the Board is responsible for determining the nature and extent of the principal risks it is willing to take in achieving its strategic objectives and that it should maintain sound risk management and internal control systems.
The Board has completed its assessment of the Group's risk landscape and has identied the most signicant risks and uncertainties that may impact the Group's ability to achieve its strategic and operational goals. As part of the new 2024 Code guidance, the Board has also begun to assess the material controls that operate over these risks. The Group recognises that the prole of risks constantly changes, and additional risks not presently known, or that may be currently deemed immaterial, may also impact the Group's business objectives (as detailed on pages 34 to 37) and performance. The risk management framework is therefore designed to manage rather than eliminate the risk of failure to achieve business objectives, and, as such, can only provide reasonable and not absolute assurance against these principal uncertainties impacting business performance.
The Board conrms that it has carried out a robust assessment of the principal risks facing the Group, including those that would threaten its business model, future success, solvency or liquidity.
As part of the ongoing risk management framework described above, the Group identies emerging risks and determines their potential impact on the business. The Group undertakes horizon scanning to monitor any potential risks that could change our industry and/or our business, looking at both the inherent risk and opportunity. Emerging risks are new and evolving, and thus their full potential impact is still uncertain.
The Group denes emerging risks as newly developing risks that are often difcult to quantify but may materially affect our business. Emerging risks are usually highly uncertain risks which are external to the Group, and we take a proactive approach to the emerging risk management processes, with the objective of enabling us to:
The Board's assessment of the principal risks and uncertainties facing the Group and the mitigations in place are set out opposite.

| 1 | Business strategy execution and development | 1 |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Key suppliers and supply chain | 2 |
| 3 | Client experience and market risks | 3 |
| 4 | Colleague talent and capability | 4 |
| 5 | Data protection and cyber security | 5 |
| 6 | Business interruption | 6 |
| 7 | Regulatory and compliance | 7 |
| 8 | Economic and political | 8 |
| 9 | Brand and reputational damage | 9 |
| 10 | Financial and treasury | 10 |
| 11 | Climate change | 11 |
Donates increasing risk
To support our assessment of risk, the heat map above shows the relative likelihood and impact of the Group's principal risks post-mitigation i.e. after the effects of our control activities. The graph also indicates those risks that have seen signicant movement during the year. A more detailed assessment of each principal risk is provided over the following pages.

Leverage best-in-class operations
Expand our multi-channel leadership

If the Board adopts the wrong strategy or does not implement its strategy effectively, the business may suffer.
The Group's growth strategy exposes it to risks and the Group may encounter setbacks in its ongoing expansion in the UK and US.
The Group's signicant investments in its showroom portfolio, IT systems, colleagues and marketing may be unsuccessful in growing the Group's business as planned.
As the Group continues to make acquisitions, these may prove unsuccessful or divert its resources. Further growth through acquisition is dependent upon the Group's ability to identify suitable targets, conduct effective due diligence, negotiate transactions on favourable terms, complete such transactions and successfully integrate the acquired businesses.
The Group may fail to respond to the pressures of an increasingly changing retail environment effectively and rapidly. The re-evaluation of priorities and their delivery, including the consideration of initiatives to respond to permanent changes in client behaviours or to change working practices, is paramount in the current environment.


The manufacture of key luxury watch brands is highly concentrated among a limited number of brand partners and the production of luxury watches is limited by the small number of master watchmakers and the availability of artisanal skills. Owners of luxury watch brands control distribution through strict, Selective Distribution Agreements. Consequently, the relationship with owners of luxury watch brands is crucial to the Group's success.
Some of the Group's distribution agreements with luxury watch brands provide owners of such brands with a right to terminate the agreement in the event of a change of control and/or management of the Group. The Group is subject to the risk that owners of luxury watch brands may decide to terminate these contracts or otherwise not to renew them upon expiry, or to reduce the number of agencies they grant to the Group.
The Group's distribution agreements with suppliers do not guarantee a steady supply of merchandise.
The Group's business model may also come under signicant pressure should the owners of luxury watch and jewellery brands choose to distribute their own watches, increasingly or entirely by-passing third-party retailers such as the Group.

An inability to maintain a consistent high-quality experience for the Group's clients across the sales channels, particularly within the showroom network, could adversely affect business.
The increased number of registration of interest (ROI) watches could adversely impact the perceived client experience.
The Group faces competition and any failure by the Group to compete effectively could result in a loss of market share or the ability to retain supplier agencies. Long-term consumer attitudes to diamonds, gold and other precious metals and gemstones could be affected by a variety of issues, including concern over the source of raw materials, the impact of mining and rening of minerals on the environment, labour conditions in the supply chain, and the availability and perception of substitute products, such as cubic zirconia and laboratorycreated diamonds. Equally, longer-term consumer attitudes to more technologically advanced watches, such as 'smart watches', could reduce consumer demand for luxury watches.
The Group depends on the services of key talent to manage its business, and the departure of such colleagues or the failure to recruit and retain suitable personnel could adversely affect the Group's business.
Client experience is an essential element in the success of the Group's business, where many clients prefer a more personal face-to-face experience and have established strong relationships with the Group's retail colleagues. An inability to
recruit and retain suitably qualied colleagues, especially with specialised knowledge of luxury watches and jewellery, would have a material impact on the Group.


Change in risk No change
Links to strategy


Leverage best-in-class operations
Expand our multi-channel leadership

Drive client awareness and brand image through multimedia with impactful marketing
Deliver an exceptional client service
The increasing sophistication and frequency of cyber-attacks, coupled with data protection laws, highlight the escalating information security risk facing all businesses.
As the Group operates in the UK and US markets, the regulatory environment surrounding these areas is considered more complex.
Security breaches and failures in the Group's IT infrastructure and networks, or those of third-parties, could compromise sensitive and condential information and affect the Group's reputation.
Theft or loss of Company or client data or potential damage to any systems from viruses, ransomware or other malware could result in nes and reputational damage to the business that could negatively impact on our sales.
Change in risk Cyber threats are increasing in volume and complexity, in part driven by AI. This creates a more hostile external environment with greater risk.

Change in risk No change
Links to strategy
Adverse weather conditions, pandemics, travel disruption, natural disasters, terrorism, acts of war or other external events could adversely affect consumer discretionary spending or cause a disruption to the Group's operations.
The inability of the Group to be able to operate showrooms or a signicant reduction in available colleagues to operate the business, such as during a material pandemic, would signicantly impact the operations of the business.
The Group offers exible delivery options (home delivery or Click & Collect in showroom) and its online operations rely on third-party carriers and transportation providers. The Group's shipments are subject to various risks, including labour strikes and adverse weather.
The Group may experience signicant theft of products from its showrooms, distribution centres or during the transportation of goods. Loss of high-value low-availability pieces could damage our reputation and our clients may become less inclined to visit our showrooms.
Disruptions to, or failures in, the Group's IT infrastructure and networks, or those of third-parties, could disrupt the Group's operations, especially during periods of increased reliance on these systems such as those experienced during the pandemic lockdowns.
The Group relies on IT networks and systems, some of which are managed by third-parties, to process, encrypt and transmit electronic information, and to manage or support a variety of business processes and activities, including sales, supply chain, merchandise distribution, client invoicing and collection of payments.
Ongoing legal, political and economic uncertainty in the UK, US and international markets could give rise to signicant currency uctuations, interest rate increases, adverse taxation arrangements or affect current trading and supply arrangements. single market
unpredictable impacts

Change in risk No change
Links to strategy
The Watches of Switzerland Group's trading brands and its corporate brand are an important asset, and failure to protect the Group's reputation and brand could lead to a loss of trust and condence. This could result in a decline in the client base, affect the ability to recruit and retain the best people, and damage our reputation with our suppliers or investors.
THE WATCHES OF SWITZERLAND GROUP PLC
ANNUAL REPORT AND ACCOUNTS 2025


Leverage best-in-class operations


Deliver an exceptional client service Drive client awareness and brand image through multimedia with impactful marketing
The Group's ability to meet its nancial obligations and to support the operations and expansion of the business is dependent on having sufcient funding over the short, medium and long-term. The Group is reliant on the availability of adequate nancing from banks and capital markets to meet its liquidity needs.
The Group's level of indebtedness could adversely affect its ability to react to changes in the business and may limit the commercial and nancial exibility to operate the business.
The Group is exposed to foreign exchange risk and prots may be adversely impacted by unforeseen movements in foreign exchange rates.
Signicantly reduced trading over an extended period could impact the business's ability to operate within committed credit facilities.

Change in risk No change
Links to strategy
The increased frequency of extreme weather events may lead to the signicant disruption of retail showrooms, ofces and distribution centres, through ooding and strong winds. The supply chain may also be impacted through transporting goods to showrooms and directly to our clients.
In a changing climate, there is the potential for higher insurance premiums across business operations, especially those taking place in geographies particularly impacted by extreme weather events.
The increasing cost of energy and potential regulatory mechanisms on direct carbon emissions, may impact business nancials and prot if the Group cannot transition to a low-carbon business model.
The Group's reliance on premium raw materials, which are a nite resource, increases its exposure to resource scarcity, and the potential increased cost of obtaining these resources in a challenging and competitive supply chain environment.
The Group may fail to implement its mitigation strategy to reduce its impact on the climate and manage the risk appropriately, leading to increased scrutiny from stakeholders and investors, resulting in reputational damage.
The Directors consider that the Group has, at the time of approving the Group Consolidated Financial Statements, adequate resources to remain in operation for the foreseeable future and have therefore continued to adopt the going concern basis in preparing the consolidated information.
On 13 December 2024, the Group renanced and repaid its \$115.0 million term loan facility which was originally taken out to nance the Roberto Coin Inc. acquisition with a new £150.0 million facility, being made up of a £100.0 million term loan and £50.0 million multicurrency revolving credit facility. The £100.0 million was drawn down on 13 December 2024 as \$125.0 million and no further drawdown on the £100.0 million is permitted. The new facilities run coterminously with the existing UK bank facility of £225.0 million. The going concern assessment has been carried out taking into account all facilities now in place.
The key covenant tests attached to all Group facilities are a measure of net debt to EBITDA, and the Fixed Charge Cover Ratio (FCCR) at each April and October. The facility covenants are on a pre-IFRS 16 basis and exclude share-based payment costs. Net debt to EBITDA is dened as the ratio of total net debt at the reporting date to the last 12-month Adjusted EBITDA. This ratio must not exceed 3. The FCCR is the ratio of Adjusted EBITDA plus rent to the total nance charge and rent for the 12 months to the reporting date. This ratio must exceed 1.6. At 27 April 2025 the Group comfortably satised the covenant tests with net debt to EBITDA being less than 3 and the FCCR exceeding 1.6.
At the balance sheet date, the Group had a total of £368.9 million in available committed facilities, of which £195.1 million was drawn down. Net debt at this date was £96.2 million. Liquidity headroom (dened as unrestricted cash plus undrawn available facilities) was £253.5 million. All bank facilities run coterminously and are due to expire in May 2028. Further detail with regards to covenant tests and liquidity headroom can be found in borrowings note 19 within the Consolidated Financial Statements.
In assessing whether the going concern basis of accounting is appropriate, the Directors have reviewed various trading scenarios for the period to 31 October 2026 from the date of this report. These included:
Under the base case forecast, the Group has signicant liquidity and complies with all covenant tests to 31 October 2026. The forecast reects current visibility of supply from key brands and conrmed showroom refurbishments, openings and closures, and excludes uncommitted capital projects and acquisitions which would only occur if expected to be incremental to the business.
Under these scenarios the net debt to EBITDA and the FCCR covenants would be complied with.
The Directors also considered whether there were any events or conditions occurring just outside the going concern period that should be considered in their assessment, including whether the going concern period needed to be extended.
As a result of the above analysis, including potential severe but plausible scenarios and the reverse stress test, the Board believes that the Group and Company is able to adequately manage its nancing and principal risks, and that the Group and Company will be able to operate within the level of its facilities and meet the required covenants for the period to 31 October 2026. For this reason, the Board considers it appropriate for the Group and Company to adopt the going concern basis in preparing the Consolidated Financial Statements.
In accordance with UK Corporate Governance Code (the Code), the Directors are required to issue a Viability Statement declaring whether the Directors believe the Group is able to continue to operate and meet its liabilities over a period greater than 12 months, taking into account its current position and principal risks.
The Directors have assessed the prospects of the Group by reference to its current nancial position, its recent and historical nancial performance, its forecasts for future performance, its business model (pages 26 and 27), strategy (pages 34 to 37) and its principal risks and mitigating factors (pages 148 to 153). In addition, the Board regularly reviews the nancial position of the Group, its liquidity and nancial forecasts.
The base case forecast for FY26 aligns to Guidance given on page 13, and other years have prudently assumed no further sales or prot uplift for the purposes of our viability assessment.
The Directors have assessed the prospects of the Group over a three-year period to April 2028. This period is considered an appropriate timeframe to assess the Group's prospects and is consistent with the Group's business model, strategic planning period, management incentive schemes and medium-term nancing considerations.
The strategic planning process reviewed by the Board is over a three-year period. In determining the appropriate assessment period, the Board considered the uncertainty regarding a number of global economic events, including the level of ination, the cost-of-living crisis, and the impact of US tariffs, together with a number of environmental matters.
On 13 December 2024, the Group renanced and repaid its \$115.0 million term loan facility which was originally taken out to nance the Roberto Coin Inc. acquisition with a new £150.0 million facility, being made up of a £100.0 million term loan and £50.0 million multicurrency revolving credit facility. The £100.0 million was drawn down on 13 December 2024 as \$125.0 million and no further drawdown on the £100.0 million is permitted. The new facilities run coterminously with the existing UK bank facility of £225.0 million. The going concern assessment has been carried out taking into account all facilities now in place. All bank facilities run coterminously and are due to expire in May 2028.
The key covenant tests attached to all Group facilities are a measure of net debt to EBITDA, and the Fixed Charge Cover Ratio (FCCR) at each April and October. The facility covenants are on a pre-IFRS 16 basis and exclude share-based payment costs. Net debt to EBITDA is dened as the ratio of total net debt at the reporting date to the last 12-month Adjusted EBITDA. This ratio must not exceed 3. The FCCR is the ratio of Adjusted EBITDA plus rent to the total nance charge and rent for the 12 months to the reporting date. This ratio must exceed 1.6. At 27 April 2025 the Group comfortably satised the covenant tests with net debt to EBITDA being less than 3 and the FCCR exceeding 1.6.
During the three-year viability period, the Group anticipates that it will comfortably comply with the net debt to EBITDA and FCCR covenants at each six-month interval from October 2025 to April 2028.
During the normal cycle of strategic planning, budgets and forecasts are approved by the Board at the start of each nancial year.
In making the Viability Statement, the Board carried out a robust assessment of the principal risks and uncertainties facing Group as described on pages 148 to 153. In addition to the uncertainties noted above, the key risks identied that would have a material impact on the long-term viability of the Group were the loss of a key supplier and the impact of a potential penalty for statutory breaches
The scenarios assessed in relation to viability were:
These scenarios would still result in the net debt to EBITDA and the FCCR covenants all being complied with.
Whilst global economic factors could impact the Group, the long-term strategy for value creation in the UK and US remains unchanged. The advantages of the Group's multi-channel operating model coupled with its scale and technological expertise should enable the business to outperform the market, take market share and capitalise on the material growth opportunities in the US.
The nancial impact of actions being taken by the Group to achieve its climate change commitment have been included in future cash ows and stress testing.
Based upon this assessment, the Directors conrm that they have a reasonable expectation that the Group will be able to continue in operation to meet its liabilities as they fall due over the three-year assessment period.
Approved by the Board and signed on its behalf:
BRIAN DUFFY CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER 2 July 2025





Board Skills
| Board | Audit & Risk | Remuneration | Nomination | ESG | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Director | Held | Attended | Held | Attended | Held | Attended | Held | Attended | Held | Attended |
| Ian Carter | 6 | 6 | n/a | n/a | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 |
| Brian Duffy | 6 | 6 | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | 3 | 3 |
| Anders Romberg | 6 | 6 | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a |
| Tea Colaianni | 6 | 6 | 4 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 |
| Baroness (Rosa) Monckton MBE | 6 | 6 | 4 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 |
| Robert Moorhead | 6 | 6 | 4 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 |
| Chabi Nouri | 6 | 6 | 4 | 4 | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | 3 | 3 |
Below is a summary of the key matters reserved for the Board. The full document can be viewed on the corporate website thewosgroupplc.com

The Company is committed to supporting work initiatives that promote a culture of diversity and inclusion throughout the organisation."
The Report that follows, in conjunction with the other Committee reports, provides a clear and transparent overview of the Board's oversight, providing details of our robust governance and risk management, our effective engagement with stakeholders and compliance with the principles and provisions of the Corporate Governance Code 2018.
As detailed in last year's Chair's letter, the Board has been briefed on the changes of the UK Corporate Governance Code 2024 which come into effect for FY26 and FY27. The Board considers that the Company is already prepared for the new requirements, which come into effect for FY26 and has included enhanced reporting and disclosures in the Annual Report and Accounts. The new substantive internal control changes will be effective for FY27, and the Company is making good progress to ensure the new requirements will be complied with by the deadline. The Board – alongside the Audit & Risk Committee – is being kept regularly updated on the plan and its progress.
Additionally, the Board has reviewed the requirements on the 'failure to prevent fraud' offence, which will become effective from September 2025. The Company will be building on its existing anti-fraud controls to enhance and build on existing procedures.
The Board believes that effective governance leads to better decision-making and that the robust framework should be embedded within every level of the organisation.
Throughout the nancial year, the Board and its Committees have been highly engaged and played a key role in overseeing and shaping the strategic direction of the Group and supporting management. The Board aims to ensure the business remains sustainable over the long-term and ready to respond to external factors which may affect it. With the continuing challenging macroeconomic environment, the Board has focused on supporting the business to mitigate the ongoing impact of the economic environment whilst delivering its strategy, and ensuring the Group is in a strong position to take advantage when the economic environment improves. The business has been resilient and agile and the Board believes that our strategy remains the right one for the long-term success of the business and that the right team is in place to deliver it. To achieve this, it is essential for the Board to ensure appropriate governance is in place to support the Executive Directors and Senior Management.
We conducted an externally facilitated Board Performance Review this year. I was pleased that the review showed that there is a high level of satisfaction with the effectiveness of the Board and its Committees, with no high priority or urgent matters identied as needing to be addressed. More details can be found on page 175.
The Board continues to recognise the importance of diversity, inclusion and opportunities for all, including the benets of recruiting leaders who reect the diverse communities which we serve, and society as a whole.
The Company is not only focused on diversity and inclusion at the top level of the organisation but is committed to supporting work initiatives that promote a culture of inclusion and diversity throughout the organisation.
In recognition of the continually changing environment, the Board amended its Board Diversity & Inclusion Policy in May 2025, to take account of new recommendations of the Parker Review; recognising the importance of reviewing and enhancing recruitment practices by eliminating bias; creating progression opportunities for underrepresented groups and sustaining strong leadership pipelines; and recognising the importance of sponsorship, mentorship and structured training in developing leadership.
Additional information on diversity and inclusion in the boardroom can be found in the Nomination Committee Report on page 176 and 177 and information on the wider organisation can be found in the People Strategy section on pages 78 to 99.
Our succession planning and future recruitment considers diversity as set out in our Board Diversity & Inclusion Policy, which can be found on our corporate website thewosgroupplc.com.
The Company's governance framework has been further enhanced this year, with the recruitment of a new Head of Procurement and the introduction of Supplier Sustainability Standards (previously known as ESG Partner Standards), which have been issued to all suppliers.
We take our responsibilities to stakeholders very seriously ensuring all stakeholder views, whether complementary or diverging, are understood and embedded into Board discussions and the decision-making process. We also consider the impact of the Group's activities on the communities within which it operates, the environment and the Group's reputation for high standards of business conduct.
The Board considers all relevant stakeholders during its decision-making processes and continues to strengthen its understanding of the different key stakeholder groups. Relationships with our brand partners and other key suppliers are reviewed at each Board meeting and updates provided of activities undertaken. At the beginning of FY25, the Board held one of its meetings in Geneva. This visit was the perfect opportunity to meet with our key brand partners.
Baroness (Rosa) Monckton MBE, continues as our Designated Non-Executive Director for Workforce Engagement, providing information to the Board on key areas of interest and concern from our colleagues. Rosa's attendance at the Listening Forums, both UK and US, as well as our Global Listening Forum ensures that the Board remains increasingly visible amongst our colleagues. After each forum, Rosa reports back to the Board on her ndings. During the year, the Workforce Engagement Programme was refreshed and from May 2025 Rosa will meet with a mixed group of junior team members (Head of Department level and below), known as skip-level meetings. Topics to be discussed over the next 12 months include business operation and culture. Equally, colleagues will get the opportunity to ask questions to Rosa from an outside-in-perspective, there will be no predetermined questions.
Rosa's feedback, along with the annual Colleague Engagement Survey, helps us to ensure that our colleagues' perspectives are considered by the Board and Committees during their decision-making processes.
More information on the Board's decision-making, engaging with stakeholders, as well as the interests of each of its stakeholders, can be found on pages 171 and 172.
There have been no changes to the membership of the Board or Committees during the year. The rst three-year tenure for Chabi Nouri came to an end on 1 May 2025 and the second three-year tenure came to an end for Tea Colaianni, Robert Moorhead and Rosa Monckton early in May 2025. All the Directors expressed their willingness to remain in ofce and their Letters of Appointments were extended for a further three years. Further details can be found on page 205.
We will be putting a new Remuneration Policy to our shareholders at the 2025 AGM. This follows engagement with our top shareholders. Full details regarding the new policy can be found in the Directors' Remuneration Report on page 200.
I look forward to engaging with you at the forthcoming AGM which is scheduled to take place on 3 September 2025, commencing at 2.30pm, and will be held at 36 North Row, London W1K 6DH. Full details including the resolutions to be proposed to our shareholders can be found in the Notice of AGM, which will be communicated to shareholders and made available on our corporate website thewosgroupplc.com.
I am pleased to provide you with a clear outline of the work the Board has undertaken during the year and how our governance and Board agendas are aligned with the Group's strategy.
CHAIR 2 July 2025

IAN CARTER Chair

BRIAN DUFFY Chief Executive Ofcer Executive Director
Brian has served on several boards across the fashion, retail and sports sectors and has been the CEO of the Group since 2014. Brian has previously served on the boards of several subsidiaries of Ralph Lauren, as well as the board of Celtic PLC. Brian is an ICAS Chartered Accountant and holds an Honorary Doctorate from Glasgow
Brian is the Chair of The Watches of Switzerland Group Foundation and was recently the Chair of The King's Trust Retail, Leisure and Hospitality Fundraising Leadership Group, stepping down in December 2024.
Caledonian University.

ANDERS ROMBERG Chief Financial Ofcer Executive Director
Anders was reappointed to the Board in 2023 as Chief Financial Ofcer. Anders was previously the CFO at the Watches of Switzerland Group from 2014 to 2022, transforming the business globally and taking the Company from private to public. Before this, Anders was with Ralph Lauren serving as Chief Financial Ofcer and Chief Operating Ofcer for Europe, Middle East and Africa, and Chief Operating Ofcer for Asia Pacic. Anders has previously held senior nance roles at Gillette and Duracell.
| Restaurant Group Inc., listed in the US. | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| INDEPENDENT | Yes | No | No | ||
| PRINCIPAL EXTERNAL APPOINTMENTS |
Servpro Industries, LLC Eataly USA LLC |
The Watches of Switzerland Group Foundation |
None | ||
| RELEVANT SKILLS AND EXPERIENCE |
Ian brings to the Board a wealth of international and retail experience and a deep understanding of the global luxury industry. Ian has considerable experience in the understanding of matters of a strategic nature. Ian also has signicant experience as a non-executive director. |
Brian brings to the Board signicant retail and international experience, nancial acumen and in-depth understanding of the global luxury watch and jewellery sector. Brian's corporate experience is relevant to the governance of a listed company and includes culture and stakeholder considerations. |
Anders brings to the Board extensive experience at Senior Management level of accounting and operational matters, including IT and cyber, and has extensive experience in the international luxury retail sector. |
||
| COMMITTEE MEMBERSHIP | – Nomination (Chair) | – ESG |
– ESG
Ian brings over 30 years of international and retail experience, having held a number of senior positions at consumer-facing and luxury companies. Ian currently serves as a non-executive director with Servpro Industries, LLC, owned by Blackstone, where he is the Chair of the Audit Committee. Ian is Chair of Eataly USA LLC. Ian joined Hilton International as CEO in London in 2005 becoming an integral part of the team that took Hilton Worldwide private and then public in 2013. Prior to joining Hilton, Ian served as an Ofcer and President of Black & Decker Corporation. Ian has signicant experience as a non-executive director having served on a number of boards in the UK and the US, including Burberry Group PLC and Chair of the Del Frisco
ANNUAL REPORT AND ACCOUNTS 2025
THE WATCHES OF SWITZERLAND GROUP PLC
APPOINTED

TEA COLAIANNI Senior Independent Director Non-Executive Director
Tea was appointed as a Non-Executive Director and Chair of the Remuneration Committee in December 2018 and Senior Independent Director of the Company in May 2019. Tea has more than 30 years' experience in international human resource positions, within consumer facing industries, and has served as a non-executive director on multiple boards including DWF Group Plc, Bounty Brands and Mothercare Plc, and also as the Chair of the Remuneration Committees. Tea is currently serving on the board of SD Worx NV as an Executive, and has held senior roles at Merlin Entertainments and Hilton

BARONESS (ROSA) MONCKTON MBE Independent Designated Non-Executive Director for Workforce Engagement
Rosa has over 20 years' experience in the luxury jewellery and watch sectors, and was appointed as a Non-Executive Director in 2014. Her experience includes setting up Tiffany & Co in the UK, and serving as Chief Executive Ofcer and then Chair of Asprey & Garrard. Rosa also has experience in the charity sector, and campaigns on behalf of disabled children and adults, through her role as Chair of Team Domenica.
Rosa is a member of the House of Lords having been granted peerage in January 2024 for her work as a charity founder and advocate for inclusion and equal opportunity for people with special

ROBERT MOORHEAD Independent Non-Executive Director
Robert has signicant experience in the retail sector and was appointed as a Non-Executive Director in 2018. Robert previously served as Chief Financial Ofcer and Chief Operating Ofcer of WH Smith PLC, and was Finance Director at Specsavers Optical Group and Finance and IT Director at World Duty Free Europe Limited. Robert is an ICAEW Chartered Accountant.

CHABI NOURI Independent Non-Executive Director
– ESG
Chabi has over 20 years' experience in the luxury jewellery and watch sectors and was appointed as a Non-Executive Director in 2022. Chabi has particular experience in the jewellery sector for marketing and merchandising, being responsible for Cartier's creative and ne jewellery collections and in watches serving as the Chief Marketing Ofcer of Piaget, before being appointed as Chief Executive Ofcer of the company in 2017. Chabi is currently, since August 2024, the Global CEO of Bonhams, a non-executive director of Lucid Group, Inc., an automotive and luxury consumer goods business listed on the US Stock
| Hotels Corporation. Tea is the Founder and Chair of WiHTL – Diversity in Hospitality, Travel and Leisure and Diversity in Retail (DiR). |
educational needs. | Exchange. Prior to her current role Chabi was a Private Equity Partner with Mirabaud Asset Management. |
||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tea is a qualied lawyer. | ||||
| Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | |
| SD Worx NV | Team Domenica | None | Bonhams Lucid Group, Inc. EveryWatch DMCC |
|
| Tea brings to the Board a wealth of experience in HR strategy governance and consumer facing industries as well as extensive DEI expertise. Tea's signicant experience as a non-executive director, including extensive and current experience of all remuneration matters, enables her to carry out her role as Chair of the Remuneration Committee. |
Rosa brings to the Board signicant experience of the luxury jewellery and watch industry. Rosa's environmental, social and governance (ESG) experience includes diversity and inclusion initiatives and a deep understanding of the charity sector, which enables her to carry out her role as Chair of the ESG Committee. |
Robert brings to the Board extensive experience in the retail sector as well as recent relevant and up to date nancial and information technology and cyber experience, which enables him to carry out his role as Chair of the Audit & Risk Committee. |
Chabi brings to the Board signicant international experience of the luxury watches and jewellery retail industry. Chabi has relevant experience and acumen in strategic matters. |
|
| – Audit & Risk | – Audit & Risk | – Audit & Risk (Chair) | – Audit & Risk |
– ESG (Chair)
– ESG
163
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE REPORT CONTINUED
This Corporate Governance Statement explains key features of the Group's governance structure and how the Group measures itself against the standards set out in the UK Corporate Governance Code 2018 (the 'Code'), as required by the Listing Rules of the Financial Conduct Authority, the accepted standard of good governance practice in the UK. A copy of the Code can be found on the Financial Reporting Council's website at frc.org.uk.
We believe that good governance provides the framework for stronger value creation and lower risk for shareholders. It is the Board's responsibility to instil and maintain a culture of openness, integrity and transparency throughout the business, through our actions and conduct, policies and communications.
We apply corporate governance guidelines in a way that is relevant and meaningful to our business and consistent with our culture and values. If we decide that the interests of the Company and its shareholders can be better served by doing things in a different way, we will explain the reasons why.
Disclosures required by the Disclosure Guidance and Transparency Rules DTR 7.2.6 with regard to share capital are presented in the Directors' Report on page 212. Disclosures required by DTR 7.2.8 relating to Diversity & Inclusion Policy are presented in the Nomination Committee Report on page 177. Information concerning diversity, including gender and ethnicity, as required under Listing Rule UKLR 6.6.6R(10) can be found on page 173 and in the Nomination Committee Report on page 177.
| Statutory information | Section of report | Page |
|---|---|---|
| Internal control and risk management | Risk Management | 174 |
| Securities carrying special rights with regard to the control of the Company |
Directors' Report | 212 |
| Restrictions on voting rights | Directors' Report | 212 |
| Appointment and replacement of Directors and amendments to the Company's Articles |
Directors' Report | 211 |
| Powers of the Company's Directors relating to transactions in own shares |
Directors' Report | 212 |
| Purpose, values and culture | Environmental, Social and Governance | 74 |
The Company's obligation is to state whether it has complied with the relevant provisions of the Code, or to explain why it has not done so (up to the date of this Annual Report and Accounts).
The Board conrms that, throughout the year, the Company has applied the principles, both in spirit and in form, and complied with the provisions set out in the issued by the Financial Reporting Council (FRC) in July 2018. The Company's governance arrangements have been considered alongside the Code. The information set out in the Corporate Governance Statement and the Directors' Report on pages 164 to 213, including the various Board Committee Reports (on pages 176 to 189), is intended to provide an explanation of how the Code's principles were applied practically throughout the year.
This Corporate Governance Statement is approved by the Board and signed on behalf of the Board by the Chair and by the Company Secretary.
2 July 2025 2 July 2025
IAN CARTER LAURA BATTLEY CHAIR COMPANY SECRETARY
DIVISION OF RESPONSIBILITIES
READ MORE: Page 166

READ MORE: Page 167

UK CORPORATE GOVERNANCE CODE 2018
COMPOSITION, SUCCESSION & EVALUATION
READ MORE: Page 172

AUDIT, RISK MANAGEMENT & INTERNAL CONTROL
READ MORE: Page 174

REMUNERATION
READ MORE: Page 174
The Board facilitates the operation of an open and straight-forward culture without complex hierarchy and over-delegation of responsibilities. The structure of the Board and its governance framework is set out below.

There are also a number of functional working groups which support the Steering Groups. For further information on the ESG Governance Framework see page 76
and 119.

There is a clear division of responsibilities between the Chair and the CEO, which is set out in writing and has been agreed by the Board. This can be found on our corporate website at thewosgroupplc.com.
The Board biographies are included on pages 162 and 163.
| Chair | – Responsible for the operation, leadership and governance of the Board |
|---|---|
| – Sets the Board agenda and ensures sufcient time is allocated to ensure effective debate to support sound decision-making | |
| – Ensures the Board is fully informed of all matters and receives precise, timely and clear information sufcient to make informed judgements |
|
| – Ensures each Non-Executive Director makes an effective contribution to the Board | |
| – Meets with the Non-Executive Directors independently of the Executive Directors | |
| Chief Executive Ofcer | – Management of the day-to-day operations of the Group |
| – Develops the Group's strategic objectives for consideration and approval by the Board | |
| – Implements the strategy approved by the Board | |
| – Leads the Trading Board and Senior Management | |
| – Manages the Company and the Group | |
| – Ensures effective and ongoing communication with investors | |
| Chief Financial Ofcer | – Manages all aspects of the Group's nancial affairs |
| – Works with the CEO to develop and implement the Group's strategic objectives | |
| – Delivers the nancial performance of the Group | |
| – Ensures the Group remains appropriately funded to pursue its strategic objectives | |
| – Ensures proper nancial controls and risk management of the Group and compliance with associated regulation | |
| – Ensures effective and ongoing communication with investors | |
| Senior Independent Director | – Acts as a 'sounding board' for the Chair and serves as an intermediary for the other Directors where necessary |
| – Leads the Non-Executive Directors in their annual assessment of the Chair's performance | |
| – Available to investors if they have concerns which the normal channels through the Chair, CEO or other Directors have failed to resolve |
|
| Non-Executive Directors | – Are all independent, experienced and inuential individuals from a diverse range of industries, backgrounds and countries |
| – Provide constructive contribution and challenge to the Executive Directors regarding the development of the strategy | |
| – Scrutinise the operational and nancial performance of Senior Management | |
| – Monitor the integrity of nancial information, nancial controls and systems of risk management | |
| – Devote such time as is necessary to the proper performance of their duties | |
| Designated Non-Executive | – Gauges the views of colleagues and identies any areas of concern |
| Director for Workforce Engagement |
– Ensures the views and concerns of the workforce are taken into account by the Board, particularly when they are making decisions that could affect colleagues |
| – Ensures the Board takes appropriate steps to evaluate the impact of proposals and developments on colleagues and considers what steps should be taken to mitigate any adverse impact |
|
| Company Secretary and General Counsel |
– Supports the Board and its Committees with their responsibilities and ensures information is made available to Board members in a timely fashion |
| – Supports the Chair in setting Board agendas, designing and delivering Board inductions and Board evaluations, and co ordinates post-evaluation action plans |
|
| – Advises on regulatory compliance and corporate governance matters | |
| – Ensures compliance with the Board's procedures and with applicable rules and regulations | |
| – Communicates with investors and organises the AGM |

The Board provides leadership to the Group and is collectively responsible for promoting its long-term success and for delivering sustainable value to all stakeholders.
The Board ensures there is a sound system of internal control and risk management in place (including nancial, operational and compliance controls) and ensures the overall effectiveness and maintenance of those systems.
The Board is supported by a number of Committees, to which it has delegated certain powers. The role of these Committees, their respective memberships, responsibilities and activities, during the year, are detailed on pages 176 to 199.
Some decisions are sufciently material or important to the Group's business that they can only be made by the Board as a whole. There is a Schedule of Matters Reserved for the Board ('Reserved Matters'), which contains items reserved for the Board to consider and approve, relating to strategy and management, material contracts, nancial reporting and controls, internal controls and risk management, Board membership and succession planning, corporate governance, structure and capital, and delegation of authority. In addition to the Reserved Matters, each Board Committee has written Terms of Reference dening its role and responsibilities. The Reserved Matters and the Terms of Reference of the Board Committees can be found on our corporate website, thewosgroupplc.com. Further details regarding the role and activities of the Board can be found on pages 165 and 168 to 169. The Reserved Matters and the various Committees' Terms of Reference are reviewed annually, updated as appropriate and approved by the Board.
To support with stakeholder considerations and engagement, the Board has received updates on its roles and responsibilities, including its duties under the Companies Act 2006 and, in particular, is equipped to consider S172(1) of the Companies Act 2006 when decision-making for the Group.
Group policies and processes have been drafted with these duties in mind and to ensure that there is a culture of stakeholder engagement within the Group. The Company's purpose and values can be found on page 1.
The Company Secretary and General Counsel ensures that as the Board makes decisions, the impact on any of the stakeholder groups is considered.
In addition to the six scheduled Board meetings, the Board held two additional meetings to review the Trading Updates released to the market during the nancial year and delegate to the Disclosure Committee for the nal approval. A number of ad hoc meetings were also held to cover approvals which arose outside of the scheduled meetings. Additionally, a full day Board strategy session was held, where the Board received a number of presentations from Senior Management representing various functions, within the Group, and outlining matters which are considered to be strategically important to the Group going forward.
Recognising the importance of its stakeholders, and as a mechanism to improve their understanding, the Board held one of its meetings in Geneva, the home of a number of the Company's key brand partners. Scheduled meetings were also held at the corporate Support Centre in Leicester and in a London showroom.
The table on page 159 indicates the number of scheduled Board and Committee meetings, and attendance, during the nancial year.
During the year, the Non-Executive Directors held three meetings without the Executive Directors present. The Chair also regularly maintains dialogue with each of the Non-Executive Directors outside of formal meetings.
It is essential to have an appropriate mix of skills, experience, diversity and independence on the Board. Such diverse attributes enable the Board, as a whole, to provide informed opinions and advice on strategy and relevant topics, thereby discharging its duty of oversight. Appointments to the Board are made following consideration of the experience and expertise of existing Directors, any required skill sets or competencies, and the strategic requirements of the Company.
The principles of the UK Corporate Governance Code 2018 (the 'Code') are embodied in both the Board and the Nomination Committee's approach to Board performance and succession planning. During the year, the Board refreshed its skills survey, the results of which were considered by the Nomination Committee during its continuous process of evaluating the skills and experience it believes are required on the Board. The results of the survey will be continually assessed and taken into consideration by the Chair, during discussions on succession planning.
The Board discharges its responsibilities through an annual programme of Board meetings. Papers and presentations are given to the Board (and its Committees) to focus its oversight on key areas of the business, including trading, cash ows, nancial and non nancial key performance indicators and nancing.
This information helps to facilitate effective decision-making and input, and aids the Board's oversight and awareness of business performance or routine good governance practices operated by the Company. A selection of principal decisions taken by the Board can be found on pages 171 and 172. The Board considers how the interests of relevant stakeholders are set out in summary on pages 66 to 69.
Alongside this reporting, there is regular daily market updates containing summary of the share price performance.
Full and timely access to all relevant information is given to the Board in advance of meetings. For Board meetings, this consists of a formal agenda, minutes of previous meetings, a matters arising schedule with details of progress made and a comprehensive set of papers including regular operational and nancial reports. Where ad hoc meetings are required, outside of the scheduled meetings, the Board is sent documents in advance, for consideration and approval.
All Directors have the right to have their opposition to, or concerns over, any Board decision noted in the minutes. Directors are entitled to take independent professional advice at the Company's expense in the furtherance of their duties, where considered necessary.
All Directors have access to the advice and services of the Company Secretary and General Counsel.
As set out in the Reserved Matters, the Board is responsible for establishing the Company's purpose and values and ensuring these and the Company's culture are aligned. The Board monitors culture and seeks to ensure that business practices, policies and behaviours are aligned and embedded within the Company's purpose, values and culture. During the year, the Executive Director HR updated the Board on the People Strategy, and how it was being embedded into the organisation. As part of the update, the Board considered culture, and the aim to further develop a high performing culture environment which would support the long-term success of the Company.
Following changes to the 2018 Code, in addition to setting the culture from top-down, boards are now also required to focus on the manifestation of culture within the organisation. Management have started to consider what processes (and metrics) are in place to provide the Board with assurance that the desired culture is effectively embedded.


BOARD MEETINGS THROUGHOUT THE YEAR
The Board recognises the importance of ensuring a positive and supportive culture throughout the Group which it believes can lead to organisational resilience and superior performance. Culture is monitored through direct and indirect colleague engagement activities and discussions with the Executive Directors, the Executive Director HR, the Designated Non-Executive Director for Workforce Engagement and other members of Senior Management. For further information see People Strategy on pages 78 to 99.
Through the following activities we ensure the Company's culture aligns with its purpose and values:
Up until now, we engaged with colleagues through our regional Listening Forums chaired by Senior Management and co-chaired by Baroness (Rosa) Monckton MBE, Designated Non-Executive Director for Workforce Engagement.
During FY25, Baroness (Rosa) Monckton MBE joined colleagues for a meet and greet Q&A session in the Summer, along with a Climate Fresk workshop. In addition, the Board met with graduates from our internal management and leadership development programme in the Summer and in February 2025, and were joined by Heads of Department.
In conjunction with our new Communication Strategy, Rosa will hold skip-level meetings, starting in FY26 in which she will meet colleagues to discuss their work experience, without Senior Management being present. Topics will include culture, leadership, onboarding and safety. Equally colleagues will get the opportunity to ask questions to Rosa from an outside-in perspective and there will be no predetermined questions.
The Board takes responsibility for all the Group policies which are applicable to our colleagues, and further information can be found on pages 144 to 145.
Our S172(1) Companies Act 2006 Statement includes details on how the Board has had regard to the need to foster the Company's business relationships and includes a Statement of Engagement with Colleagues. More information about the Board's engagement with its colleagues, clients, brand partners and other suppliers, communities and investors can be found on pages 66 to 69.
Understanding the views of the Company's stakeholders is a key priority for the Board and the business as a whole. As part of the Board Strategy Day in February 2025, the Board reviewed its key stakeholders, an update was included to ensure each stakeholder was considered as part of the strategy discussions.
This review helped to focus the Company's resources, engagement and reporting activities by addressing issues that matter most to the Group's businesses and to the Company's wider stakeholders. Fostering strong business relationships is an intrinsic part of the Company's long established and successful compounding strategy and a key consideration in all decision-making.
We understand that our business can only grow and prosper responsibly over the long-term if we understand and respect the views and needs of our stakeholders including colleagues, clients and the communities in which we operate, as well as our brand partners and other suppliers and investors, all of whom we are accountable to. Knowing who our stakeholders are and what interests them enables us to manage their expectations and deliver upon their requirements. We ensure effective communication with all stakeholder groups by identifying key personnel who manage the relationships with them.
Further details on the key stakeholders identied can be found on page 66.
We welcome the opportunity to engage with our investors. The Chair has overall responsibility for ensuring the Company has appropriate channels of communication with all of its investors and is supported in this by the Executive Directors, the Group Finance and Investor Relations Director, the Company Secretary and General Counsel and members of Senior Management.
We are in frequent contact with investors through a scheduled programme of communications and engagements.
The Board organises and directs the Group's affairs in a way that it believes will help the Group succeed for the benet of its members as a whole, whilst having regard to each of its stakeholders. The Board seeks to ensure that it acts fairly between all members and considers both institutional investors and private shareholders when making decisions that impact them.
The Group ensures that it communicates the information that investors require, using traditional methods such as the Annual Report and Accounts, Trading Updates, RNS newswires, corporate press releases and in-person meetings. Engagements include various investor meetings attended, as appropriate, by the Chair, CEO, CFO, and the Group Finance and Investor Relations Director. A summary of meetings and communications with investors is provided at each Board meeting.
During the year, the Company's corporate brokers provided regular feedback to the Board and attended two meetings. The CEO, CFO and the Group Finance and Investor Relations Director provide information to the Board, at each meeting, on topics such as share price performance and macroeconomic conditions.
Feedback is also provided to the Board on the views of investors following individual meetings, relating to the following:
The Watches of Switzerland Group has established strong and long-standing relationships with our brand partners. We retail the most prestigious and recognised luxury watch and jewellery brands.
Our brand partners are one of our key stakeholders and maintaining relationships is critical to the success of our Group. At each Board meeting, the Board receives updates on performance by brand, supply and allocation of product as well as brand partner relationships, any meetings that have taken place with the CEO or Senior Management, events held and exclusive partnerships on future product.
Board Performance Reviews have reinforced the need for Non-Executive Directors to continue enhancing and expanding their knowledge of these relationships. Subsequently, given the importance of the brand relationships, the Board took the opportunity to hold one of its meetings in Geneva – where there is a tradition of Genevan watchmaking – and meet two of its key brand partners.
During this visit, the Board met the respective CEOs, senior representatives and employees from different functions within the businesses and was able to discuss rst-hand, the existing relationships, brand strategy, future opportunities and product allocation. The Board toured both of the brand's watchmaker manufacteurs, where it learnt about the history of the respective brands and gained insight about the product and the manufacturing process.
At a museum visit with one of the brands, the Board viewed the evolution of pieces across the years, from pocket watches to modern day complications.
The visit has extended the Board's knowledge of the product offering of key brand partners and ensured the Non-Executive Directors are better equipped in subsequent meetings to make key decisions on brand partner long-term strategy.
One of the Watches of Switzerland's Group's strategic priorities is to grow revenue, prot and return on capital employed. We achieve this through disciplined investment in growth opportunities and achieving; improved operating margins; increased shareholder returns; and delivering protable sales growth.
During FY25, the Board considered and approved the acquisition of the business of Hodinkee, which included editorial, limited edition product and insurance. The business attracts more than four million people each month across its platforms, making it the go-to digital hub for watch culture with the unique ability to drive demand and engagement across a range of watch brands.
The Board received regular updates on the acquisition, from initial discussions through to signing and completion. The Board considered the new areas of business that the Group would enter into and how the Group would benet from potential growth opportunities, as well as discussing the benets, challenges and integration. The acquisition signicantly enhanced the Group's leadership position within the watch community, particularly driving the online leadership through the use of the Hodinkee platform.
The Board considered the impact on each of the Group's key stakeholders. Following the acquisition, the Board continues to receive updates, from management, on the integration of the business and colleagues into the Group. In FY26, the Board will also receive a full nancial review, integration and 'lessons learnt' update from Senior Management as part of the annual review of the acquisition.
In considering the transaction, the Board identied and assessed the impact on all of its key stakeholders as part of its decision-making process. These considerations included:
Further information of the acquisition of the Hodinkee business can be found on pages 43 to 45.
The Company is owned by its shareholders, ranging from large institutions to private individuals (including colleagues). In order to maximise value and deliver long-term success, it is critical that we understand who our investors are and, by being open and transparent about our business and strategy, enable them to make informed decisions.
All shareholders are treated fairly and have equal access to both company information and our Board of Directors. In order to maximise value and deliver long-term success, it is critical that we understand who our investors are and their preferences.
In addition, we continually engage with potential investors to broaden the investor base.
At each Board meeting, the Board receives feedback on specic investor interactions including acquisitions and capital expenditure projects. Additionally, the CFO provides details on investor relations highlighting key shareholder movements.
During FY25, the Board received two separate presentations from our brokers which, following discussions with key investors, focused on their current needs and concerns. One was specially dedicated to capital allocation.
These presentations provide Directors with detailed knowledge of the current shareholder base and how supportive they are of the Company's management and strategic direction of the business. It equips the Directors with views of the investors and supports the decision-making when considering long-term sustainable business decisions.
Further information on the share buyback program can be found on page 63.
Further information on board engagement with investors can be found on page 69.

COMPOSITION, SUCCESSION AND EVALUATION
Communities have been identied as being one of the key stakeholders of the Company. Their interests are considered by the Board as part of the principal decision making process.
In 2021, we established The Watches of Switzerland Group Foundation as a means of establishing strategic long-term partners with a number of charities, within a number of our communities, that support our values.
The Foundation has introduced avenues for our colleagues to engage with these charity partners and to volunteer within the organisations and we have seen an increased interest in this over the past few years.
Additionally, the Group continues to sponsor and build a relationship with The King's Trust on major events.
The Board receives regular updates on the Foundation and its sponsorship arrangements, which includes impact assessments and details of events held which are often attended by both Trustees of the Foundation and members of Senior Management.
The Board also receives regular updates on the success of our colleague volunteering programme through People Strategy presentations.
This ensures the Non-Executive Directors have detailed knowledge and understanding of our community activities when making key decisions on supporting our community stakeholders.
Further information on our community activities can be found on pages 92 to 99.
We are committed to giving our colleagues every reason to join, grow and stay with our Group. To full this we work within our purpose and values. Engaging with our colleagues and understanding their views is therefore of paramount importance to the Board.
We achieved Great Place to Work-Certied™ status for the rst time this year. This accolade demonstrates our commitment to create a positive colleague experience and an enjoyable working environment.
Given the importance of our colleagues, the key themes from the colleague engagement survey, as well as Great Place To Work® were presented to the Board and areas that require focus are discussed within presentations of the People Strategy.
Additionally, feedback is received from the Designated Non-Executive Director for Workforce Engagement (DNED) and from Senior Management after each colleague engagement forum. A number of initiatives have been put in place following feedback and further discussions. As evidence of the importance of continually ensuring colleague engagement remains 't for purpose' and relevant, a number of proposed changes to the programme were discussed with the DNED and communicated during FY25, these are to be put in place shortly after the end of the nancial year.
We believe we have created an inclusive culture which gives our colleagues every reason to join and develop long-term careers within our Group.
Further information on our People Strategy can be found on pages 78 to 99.
Further information on our purpose and values can be found on page 1.
The Code recommends that at least half of the Board, excluding the Chair, should comprise Non-Executive Directors determined by the Board to be independent. At the end of the year, excluding the Chair, the Board consists of six members, of which four members are determined by the Board to be independent Non-Executive Directors and is supported by the Company Secretary and General Counsel.
The composition of the Audit & Risk Committee, Nomination Committee and Remuneration Committee comply in all respects with the independence provisions of the Code.
Biographical details of the Directors of the Company are set out on pages 162 and 163.
The Company is committed to having a Board comprising Directors from different backgrounds, with diverse and relevant experience, perspectives, skills and knowledge. We believe that the Board can only adequately represent all of its stakeholder groups if collectively, it has the skills, experience and background to reect them. We believe diversity contributes towards a high performing and effective Board, and this is considered in all recruitment and succession planning discussions. We fully support the aims, objectives and recommendations outlined by the FTSE Women Leaders Review (WLR) and the Parker Review.
The Company is pleased to report that as at 27 April 2025, the Board met the targets set out in the FTSE WLR and the Parker Review, and has also met the targets set out in the UK Listing Rules 9.8.6.
We are fully committed to providing opportunities for all to promoting an inclusive culture and diverse workforce.
Further information on the Company's targets can be found in the Nomination Committee Report on page 177.
All Board appointments are based on merit, and candidates are considered against objective criteria and with due regard for the benets of diversity on the Board. As well as experience and track record, appointments will be made taking due account of other criteria, such as curiosity, insights, engagement, cultural contribution, personal identity and the differentiation that they could bring to the collective make-up of the Board.
In May 2025, the Nomination Committee reviewed the Board Diversity & Inclusion Policy which was updated, to include further recommendations of the Parker Review. The amended Policy was approved by the Board in May 2025 and can be found on our corporate website, thewosgroupplc.com.
We are fully committed to building an inclusive culture and workforce, and our Diversity and Inclusion Strategy continues to support this aim. We believe that by treating our colleagues with respect and trust, supported by our Company purpose and values, we will build a more diverse, fair, inclusive Group, which will underpin our strategy and management decisions, actions and behaviours. It is essential that the Company continues to hold itself accountable and that we have set ourselves clear goals to help us realise our ambitions.
The Company collects both gender and ethnicity data direct from the Board members and executive management annually on a self-identifying basis in a questionnaire. The data is used for statistical reporting purposes and is provided with consent. Board members and executive management are asked to identify their gender and ethnicity as set out in the table opposite.
The Nomination Committee continues to review succession plans for both Board and Senior Management each year. During the year, the Nomination Committee focused specically on the succession planning for Executive Directors, Non-Executive Directors and Senior Management. Further information on our approach to succession planning and Board appointments can be found in the Nomination Committee Report on pages 176 to 177.
The Board annually reviews the bench strength and skill set of Senior Management, taking into consideration the growth strategy of the business and the need to ensure we maintain the right levels of talent to support the future growth of the business. Succession planning for Executive Directors and Non-Executive Directors is considered on an ongoing basis throughout the year.
It is the Board's policy to conduct a Board Performance Review exercise on an annual basis. In line with the Code, the Board's policy is to conduct an externally facilitated review, at least, once every three years. During FY25, an externally facilitated board performance review was conducted by Independent Audit Limited.
The purpose of the Board Performance Review is to conduct a comprehensive review of how the Board operates, as measured against current best practice and in accordance with the UK Corporate Governance Code and associated guidance.
Further information on the Board effectiveness and Performance Review can be found on page 175.
In accordance with the Code, the Board has determined all Directors will stand for election or re-election at each AGM. The Chair of the Board has conrmed the Directors standing for re-election at this year's AGM continue to perform effectively and they demonstrate commitment to their roles. This can be seen by the attendance record set out on page 159. The reasons why the Board considers each Director's contribution is, and continues to be, important to the Company's long-term sustainable success are set out in the Directors' biographies on pages 162 and 163.
During the year, Chabi Nouri completed her rst three-year term with the Company, while Tea Colaianni, Robert Moorhead and Rosa Monckton completed their second three-year terms. All of the Non-Executive Directors expressed a willingness to remain in ofce and the Board approved that terms be extended for a period of up to three years.
Assisted by the Audit & Risk Committee, the Board has carried out a review of the Annual Report and Accounts and considers that, in its opinion, the report is fair, balanced and understandable and provides the information necessary for shareholders to assess the Group and Company's position and performance, business model and strategy. Further information on this process can be found in the Audit & Risk Committee Report on page 179.
See pages 26 and 27 in the Strategic Report for the description of our Business Model and page 154 and 155 for the Going Concern and Viability Statement.
Each of the Directors has a statutory duty under the Companies Act 2006 to avoid conicts of interest with the Company and to disclose the nature and extent of any such interest to the Board. Under the Articles, the Board may authorise any matter which would otherwise involve a Director breaching this duty to avoid conicts of interest and may attach to any such authorisation such conditions and/or restrictions on participation at relevant Board meetings. The Chair, acting reasonably, has the power to determine whether a matter was a conict matter.
Directors are required to give notice of any potential situational and/or transactional conicts, which are then considered by the Board and, if deemed appropriate, authorised accordingly. A Director is not however, permitted to participate in such considerations or to vote in relation to their own conicts.
Following the last review, the Board concluded that any potential conicts have been appropriately authorised, that no circumstances existed which would necessitate that any prior authorisation be revoked or amended and that the authorisation process continued to operate effectively.
The following tables set out the information required under the UK Listing Rule 9.8.6R(10) as at 27 April 2025. The information included supports the statements made in the Nomination Committee Report which can be found on page 177.
For the purposes of the below table, Executive Management is dened in the UK Listing Rules. In the absence of an executive committee, the Watches of Switzerland Group has dened Executive Management as the CEO and his direct reports, as per the UK Listing Rules denition and guidance.
| Gender on a self-identifying basis | Number of Board members |
Percentage of the Board |
Number of senior positions on the Board (CEO, CFO, SID and Chair) |
Number of members of Executive Management |
Percentage of Executive Management |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Men | 4 | 57.1% | 3 | 5 | 62.5% |
| Women | 3 | 42.9% | 1 | 3 | 37.5% |
| Not specied/prefer not to say | – | – | – | – | – |
| Ethnicity on a self-identifying basis | Number of Board members |
Percentage of the Board |
Number of senior positions on the Board (CEO, CFO, SID and Chair) |
Number of members of Executive Management |
Percentage of Executive Management |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| White British or other White (including minority-white groups) 6 | 85.7% | 4 | 7 | 87.5% | |
| Mixed/Multiple Ethnic Groups | 1 | 14.3% | – | 1 | 12.5% |
| Asian/Asian British | – | – | – | – | – |
| Black/African/Caribbean/Black British | – | – | – | – | – |
| Other ethnic group | – | – | – | – | – |
| Not specied/prefer not to say | – | – | – | – | – |
Any external appointments or other signicant time commitments of the Directors require the prior approval of the Board.
The Board is comfortable that external appointments of the Chair and the Directors do not impact on the time that any Director devotes to the Company and there are no overboarding concerns for any of the Directors.
The Directors are provided with annual refresher training on their duties and responsibilities as directors of a publicly listed company and governance and regulatory trends or updates. Any new director receives a comprehensive induction which includes a separate session on governance and directors' duties.
During the year, the Board Performance Review questionnaire focused on the needs of the Directors with regard to training, no new training requirements were identied. The Company Secretary and General Counsel continue to monitor the training requirements of each Director, and technical briengs are provided in response to any training requirements.
Training topics for FY25 included: effective governance; key relevant recent legal rulings; shareholder activism – recent themes; directors' duties and inside information; AI (specically on ESG matters); corporate governance; and changes to the fraud legislation.
Additionally, a Board trip to Geneva, enabled the Non-Executive Directors to extend their knowledge of two key brand partners. Further information can found on page 171.
The Board is committed to the training and development of Directors to improve their knowledge of the business and the regulatory environment in which it operates. The Company Secretary and General Counsel is responsible for helping the Chair identify and organise training for the Directors which is tailored to individual needs.
The Board acknowledges its responsibility for establishing and maintaining the Group's system of risk management and internal controls, and it receives regular reports from management identifying, evaluating and managing the risks within the business. The system of internal controls is designed to manage, rather than eliminate, the risk of failure to achieve business objectives and can provide only reasonable, and not absolute, assurance against material misstatement or loss.

Refer to page 179 for detail on the work of the Audit & Risk Committee.
The Board is collectively responsible for determining the nature and extent of the principal risks it is willing to take in achieving its strategic objectives. The processes in place for assessment, management and monitoring of risks are described in the Risk Management section on pages 144 to 147.
The Board acknowledges its responsibility for establishing and maintaining the Group's system of risk management and internal controls, and receives regular reports from management identifying, evaluating and managing the risks within the business. The system of internal controls is designed to manage, rather than eliminate, the risk of failure to achieve business objectives and can provide only reasonable, and not absolute, assurance against material misstatement or loss.
The Board, assisted by the Audit & Risk Committee, has carried out a review of the effectiveness of the system of risk management and internal controls during FY25 and for the period up to the date of approval of the Consolidated Financial Statements contained in the Annual Report and Accounts.
All relevant members of Senior Management completed an annual 'control certicate', to conrm the effectiveness of internal control within their respective area. The 'control certicate' asked for the disclosure of any known control failures, instances of non-compliance with legislation or regulatory requirements, instances of identied fraud or serious control breakdown, or any other relevant matters they are aware of, that may need to be considered by the Board.
To gain assurance over the design and operation effectiveness of controls, and to conrm that accurate statements had been provided, sample tests were conducted, by Internal Audit, to determine whether controls are effective in mitigating risks.
In conclusion, based on the work performed, the Board is satised with the adequacy of the Group control framework and the Board conrms that no signicant weaknesses or failings were identied as a result of the review of effectiveness.

The Remuneration Committee is chaired by Tea Colaianni and is made up of Independent Non-Executive Directors and the Chair. Prior to her appointment as Chair of the Committee, Tea had served on a Remuneration Committee for a signicant period of time, longer than the required 12 months.
The Committee has dened Terms of Reference which include assisting the Board in discharging its responsibilities with respect to:
Refer to page 187 for further details on the work of the Remuneration Committee.
The Audit & Risk Committee is chaired by Robert Moorhead and is comprised entirely of Independent Non-Executive Directors. Robert was until recently the Chief Financial Ofcer of WH Smith PLC and continues to have recent, relevant and up to date nancial experience. The Committee has dened Terms of Reference which include assisting the Board in discharging its responsibilities with respect to:
During FY24, the Board conducted an internal Board Evaluation. The Chair and the Company Secretary and General Counsel worked together on producing a questionnaire which reected the workings of our Board. The purpose of the exercise was to conduct a comprehensive evaluation of how the Board and its Committees operate, as measured against current best practice corporate governance principles and in accordance with the provisions of the Code and associated guidance.
The review concluded that the Board operated effectively, and the Group's governance framework had continued to develop. The Board has a range of strengths, with relevant, complementary skills and experience that help to provide scrutiny, oversight, input and value. The Directors intend to build on these strengths and develop the Board further with some key areas of focus. These strengths form a solid foundation.
Whilst the evaluation concluded that the Board and its Committees were effective and operated efciently, and with good engagement, some areas still required development. A number of recommendations were agreed and, under the supervision of the Nomination Committee, an action plan was put in place covering the following priorities:
| Key priorities identi£ed from FY24 evaluation |
Progress made against the FY24 evaluation | |
|---|---|---|
| Further work is required to ensure there is effective succession planning process for all Board members and also for Senior Management |
Additional sessions were held during the course of the year at the Nomination Committee |
|
| Executive Director HR presented an updated plan and progress which focused on succession |
||
| The Board met with the next level of 'top talent' Senior Management, informally |
||
| A detailed review of Board composition, skills, diversity and tenure to aid succession planning of Non-Executive Directors |
||
| Strategic initiatives (and less operational matters) to be given greater discussion and less presentation |
The Chair reallocated time on agendas to ensure certain items were given additional time for debate. This allows key strategic items to be prioritised |
|
| Reviewed rolling agenda items to ensure there were increased presentations from Senior Management across the business |
||
| Further enhanced training and awareness in key relevant areas e.g. around different product categories and brands |
Board meeting held in Geneva allowing Non-Executive Directors to expand their knowledge and understanding on two key brands |
|
| Received updates on Jewellery Strategy and products, particularly, new brands recently introduced to the Group |
Following the recommendations made by the 2024 Corporate Governance Code, the Company will refer to the annual evaluation as a 'Board Performance Review'. This is in line with the current process where the annual board evaluation considers Boards succession, skills and composition.
Towards the end of FY25, the Chair of the Board, alongside the Company Secretary and General Counsel, agreed the proposed approach for an external Board Performance Review with the Nomination Committee. Three expert external facilitators provided proposals for review and meetings were held with the Chair. The Company engaged Independent Audit Limited (IAL), who had carried out the previous external review in FY22. IAL is independent and does not provide any other services to the Group, and there are no connections between IAL and individual Directors to be disclosed.
A performance review questionnaire was completed to gain an insight into how well the Board is performing prior to carrying out one to one interviews with all Board members and the Company Secretary and General Counsel. The review also included the President of UK and Europe and the President of North America and Deputy CEO. IAL reviewed papers prepared for the Board's consideration.
IAL sought views on a range of topics including the effectiveness of Board composition and culture, the relationships between the Board and executive team, implementation and oversight of the strategic objectives and progress against the agreed areas of focus following the FY24 review.
The review concluded the Board has a number of strengths, including; being led by a strong Chair with immense industry knowledge; a long-standing CEO who holds the condence of the Board; a Board which is made up of strong Non-Executive Directors, who bring relevant experience; high quality company secretarial support; and Committees which are functioning well and led by strong Chairs. The Board is therefore satised that it is operating effectively.
The following areas were identied for further development:
Additionally, the Senior Independent Director conducted an independent assessment of the Chair of the Board and provided feedback to the Board.

| Ian Carter (Chair) |
|---|
| Tea Colaianni |
| Baroness (Rosa) Monckton MBE |
| Robert Moorhead |
I am pleased to report the Nomination Committee (the 'Committee') remains compliant with the Corporate Governance Code 2018 (the 'Code'). The Code recommends that the Committee be comprised of a majority of independent Non-Executive Directors which it does, as Tea Colaianni, Robert Moorhead and Baroness (Rosa) Monckton MBE are all independent.
The Company Secretary and General Counsel acts as Secretary to the Nomination Committee and, by invitation, the CEO, other Board members, the Executive Director HR, as well as other Senior Management and/or external advisers may attend as appropriate for all, or part of any meeting.
The Committee is a Board committee whose role is to keep the composition and structure of the Board and its Committees under review and has responsibility for nominating candidates for appointment as Directors to the Board having regard to the Board's structure, size and composition (including the skills, knowledge, experience, diversity and independence of its members) ensuring that the Board and its other Committees are effective in discharging their responsibilities. The Committee is tasked with ensuring that succession plans are in place for the Board and Senior Management, taking into consideration the current Board composition, the leadership requirements of the Group and the wider commercial and market environment within which the Group operates.
During the year, there were no disagreements between the Committee and the Board.
The responsibilities of the Committee are set out in its Terms of Reference which reect the current regulatory requirements and best practice appropriate to the Group's size, nature and stage of development. The Terms of Reference were reviewed during the year and minor stylistic changes were made, which included a clarication of the denition of the Group's Senior Management to ensure consistency with the Board Diversity & Inclusion Policy and the new diversity reporting requirements.
The Terms of Reference can be found in full at thewosgroupplc.com.
The Committee's Terms of Reference require that it meets at least twice a year. During the year, the Committee met three times.
The Committee plays a vital role in promoting effective Board and leadership succession, making sure it is fully aligned to the Group's strategy.
Succession planning is the process of identifying the critical positions within our organisation and developing action plans and pipelines to ll them, thereby minimising the risk to the business of key roles being vacant. The Committee continues to ensure that succession planning for business-critical roles is proactively reviewed and the diverse pipeline continues to develop.
As part of our succession planning, the Committee held a comprehensive review of talent and considered succession for Executive Directors and Senior Management. The review assessed the performance and potential of Senior Management and closely monitored successor development plans when taking into consideration the future growth strategy of the business. The Committee considered the current skills, experience and tenure of the Directors, and assessed future needs against the Group's strategic objectives. In addition to Senior Management, the Committee considered succession planning at the next level down and met key colleagues from that level, informally.
In order to conclude the Board's composition and succession planning discussions, an information memorandum was discussed which detailed current Board composition, Non-Executive Director tenure and future considerations and Board diversity.
At the same time the collation of 'skills data' was requested, which is converted into a skills matrix to help identify the Board's requirements, and as part of general Board planning, gender and ethnicity data for Board members was captured, the details of which can be found on page 158.
The Company is fully committed to providing opportunities for all to promote an inclusive culture and diverse workforce. We believe that our culture should promote integrity and openness, value diversity and be responsive to the views of all our stakeholders. Ensuring a culture of fairness and equity underpins all management decisions, actions and behaviours.
The Committee recognises the importance of diversity and inclusion both in the Boardroom and throughout the organisation, and understands that a diverse Board will offer wider perspectives which lead to better decision-making, enabling the Board to meet its responsibilities.
The Committee, on behalf of the Board, is responsible for the development of a diverse pipeline for succession to the Board and will ensure proper assessment as to the values and behaviours expected on the Board as part of the recruitment process. In being responsible for the Board's composition, the Committee will consider the benets of all aspects of diversity in order to maintain an appropriate range and balance of skills, experience and background on the Board. Whilst the Committee will take into account a variety of factors before recommending any new appointment to the Board, including relevant skills to perform the role, experience, knowledge, ethnicity and gender, the most important priority of the Committee, however, is ensuring that the best candidate is selected to join the Board.
The Committee takes into consideration all regulations and best practice, including the FTSE Women Leaders Review (FTSE WLR) as well as the Parker Review, and is pleased to report it remains compliant with the recommendations of both these initiatives. With regard to the FTSE WLR, the Company was ranked #7 of the FTSE 250 (2024: #10), its highest score to date.
The Committee annually reviews the Board Diversity & Inclusion Policy as well as measurable objectives for achieving diversity on the Board. In May 2025, the Committee reviewed the Board Diversity & Inclusion Policy and made recommendations to the Board for amendments in line with the new Corporate Governance Code.
Reporting under the Listing Rule 9.8.6 can be found within the Corporate Governance Report on page 173. The Board has chosen to align its diversity reporting reference date with the Company's nancial year-end and proposes to maintain this alignment for future reporting periods. As required under LR 9.8.6 R(10), further details in respect of the three targets as at 27 April 2025 are disclosed in the tables on page 173.
Information on Board appointments and the criteria considered can be found within the Board Diversity & Inclusion Policy on the corporate website thewosgroupplc.com.
When considering succession planning, the Nomination Committee is advised by the CEO as to the internal pipeline of Board capable candidates. The pipeline aims to appropriately reect the importance of diversity to the organisation.
The Board recognises and considers the importance of diversity, and opportunities for all, not just at Board level but throughout the organisation, and we have a number of programmes and initiatives in place within the organisation to help develop a diverse talent pipeline, including diversity induction training, learning and development, mentoring and sponsorship. Further information on our workforce initiatives on diversity and inclusion can be found on pages 82 and 83.
The FY25 Board Performance Review was conducted by way of an external facilitator, Independent Audit Limited. Directors were asked to complete a questionnaire prepared by Independent Audit, which was followed up by one-to-one interviews with the Directors and the President of UK & Europe, and the President of North America and Deputy CEO. Independent Audit also reviewed a number of Board packs.
Further details of key observations and also progress from the FY24 Board Evaluation and the process for FY25 can be found on page 175. The performance of this Committee was evaluated as part of the Board Performance Review process.
The Committee will be responsible for overseeing an action plan to be put in place following recommendations from Independent Audit, following the FY25 Board Performance Review.
As part of the annual review of the effectiveness of the Board, and its Committees, diversity and composition is considered, to ensure it is appropriate to discharge its duty effectively and to manage succession issues. The Committee keeps the composition of the Board and its Committees under continual review, to ensure that they have a suitable balance of skills and experience to oversee and challenge the delivery of the Group's strategy, and to discharge the Committee's responsibilities effectively.
The effectiveness and commitment of each of the Non-Executive Directors is reviewed by the Committee annually. During FY25 the tenure of the Non-Executive Directors was considered. Chabi Nouri's rst three-year term ended on 1 May 2025, Tea Colaianni's, and Rosa Monckton's second three-year terms ended on 7 May 2025, and Robert Moorhead's second three-year tenure ended on 10 May 2025. All of the appointments were renewed for a further three-year term following conrmation from each of an expression to continue in ofce. The Committee has satised itself as to the individual skills, relevant experience, contributions and time commitment of all the Non-Executive Directors, taking into account their other ofces and interests held. As detailed on page 211, the Board is recommending the election or re-election to ofce of all Directors at our 2025 AGM.
I will be available at the AGM to answer any questions on the work of the Committee.
CHAIR OF THE NOMINATION COMMITTEE 2 July 2025

| Robert Moorhead (Chair) |
|---|
| Tea Colaianni |
| Baroness (Rosa) Monckton MBE |
| Chabi Nouri |
– Engaging with shareholders on the scope of the external audit, where appropriate
I am pleased to introduce the Audit & Risk Committee Report for the nancial year ended 27 April 2025. The Committee plays a key role in developing the Group's governance framework and its activities included reviewing and monitoring the integrity of nancial information, the Group's system of internal controls and risk management, Internal and External Audit processes and the process for compliance with laws, regulations and ethical codes of practice. In addition, we work with other Committees and the Board to ensure that stakeholder interests are protected and support the delivery of the Group's strategy. The Committee also worked alongside the ESG Committee having regard to ESG risk management and TCFD reporting.
All members of the Audit & Risk Committee are deemed Independent Non-Executive Directors. The Board considers that I have recent and relevant nancial experience as required by the Corporate Governance Code 2018 (the Code) and the Committee has competence relevant to the sector in which the Group operates. Details of the Audit & Risk Committee members' experience can be found on pages 162 to 163. The Committee's wide range of nancial and commercial skills and experience serves to provide the necessary knowledge and ability to work as an effective committee and to robustly challenge the Executive Directors and Senior Management as and when appropriate.
At the invitation of the Committee, the Chair of the Board, the CEO, the CFO, the Director of Internal Audit, Senior Management and the External Auditor attend meetings. The Committee has regular private meetings with the External and Internal Auditors during the year.
The Company Secretary and General Counsel acts as Secretary to the Committee.
The Terms of Reference of the Committee reect the current statutory requirements and best practice appropriate to the Group's size, nature and stage of development. The Committee met its requirement to meet at least four times a year. Details of meeting attendance can be found on page 159. The Committee reviews its Terms of Reference annually, recommending any suggested changes through to the Board. Changes were made this year in anticipation of the Corporate Governance Code 2024 coming into effect on 1 January 2025, but remain aligned to the current Code guidance.
178
During FY25, an externally facilitated Board Performance Review of the Board and its Committees was undertaken. The Report concluded that the Committees were thought to be functioning well, with effective Chairs in place. Details of how the Board Performance Review was conducted can be found on page 175.
STRATEGIC REPORT | GOVERNANCE REPORT | FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
– Reported to the Board on how the Committee has discharged its responsibilities with respect to external audit
The Committee reviewed the process and assessment of the Group's prospects made by management, including:
The Committee reviewed management's analysis supporting the going concern basis of preparation, including reviewing the Group's nancial performance, FY26 forecasts and cash ow projections. The going concern and viability reviews by the Committee included the review of the results of the reverse-stress tests performed by management, available nancing in place and any further mitigating actions that management could take. In making its assessment, the Committee took into consideration the trading results of the Group, liquidity and covenant compliance.
As a result of the assessment, the Committee reported to the Board that the going concern basis of preparation remained appropriate and that there is a reasonable expectation that the Group will be able to continue in operation to meet its liabilities as they fall due over the three-year viability assessment period.
The Going Concern and Viability Statement is set out in the Strategic Report on pages 154 and 155.
In preparing the Financial Statements, there are several areas requiring the exercise of judgement by management. The Committee's role is to assess whether the judgements and estimates made by management are reasonable and appropriate. To assist in this evaluation, the CFO provided an accounting paper to the Committee, setting out all the nancial reporting judgements and estimates which were considered material to the Financial Statements.
The main areas of judgements and estimates that have been considered by the Committee in the preparation of the Financial Statements are as follows:
The Committee received and considered a paper from management covering the judgements made in respect of the impairment testing of the Group's property, plant and equipment, and right-of-use assets. The Committee noted that management had considered the trading results of each showroom and noted where a showroom has low protability which is not expected to improve in the near future. The Committee also reviewed management's assessment of whether any prior impairments should be reversed.
Given management has continued to report on the performance of the business on a pre-IFRS 16 (IAS 17) basis within its APMs alongside statutory measures derived under IFRS 16, the paper and discussions considered impairment assessment of these assets on both bases.
As part of their review of impairment, the Committee challenged the assumptions used in the cash ow forecasts for impairment testing, along with the disclosures made in the Financial Statements. The Committee also received and discussed a paper from the External Auditor on its work in this area, which specically considered and reported on its challenge and assessment of the key assumptions and methodology used.
The Committee was satised that the approach adopted by management was sufciently robust to identify when an impairment charge or reversal for showroom assets needs to be recognised and how it should be assessed and reported.
The Committee received a paper from management on accounting for and valuation of inventory, including pre-owned inventory. It discussed the judgements made by management, with specic consideration to discontinued product and slow-moving stock. The Committee also considered the policy for, and calculation of, rebates recognised and absorbed into inventory.
The Committee received a paper from the External Auditor regarding the audit work it performed over the valuation of inventory. The Committee is satised that the process and judgement adopted by management for the valuation of inventory is sufciently robust to establish the value of inventory held and is satised as to the appropriateness of the Group's provisioning policy.
The Committee received papers from management covering the control environment relating to sales cut-off and accounting judgements in relation to the accounting for gift cards, client returns and client deposits.
The Committee also received a paper from the External Auditor regarding the audit work they performed over revenue recognition, which included the use of data analytic tools. The Committee determined that the majority of the Group's revenue transactions are non-complex, with minimal judgement applied over the amount recorded.
The Committee is satised that the approach taken by management is sufciently robust in relation to the recognition of revenue.
During the year, the Committee reviewed the key judgements and assumptions applied to the calculations and disclosures provided within the Financial Statements. These included the determination of the term of the leases and the discount rates used. The Committee also considered and challenged the use of pre-IFRS 16 APMs within the Annual Report and Accounts and concluded that these APMs align with the management reporting used to inform business decisions, investment appraisals, incentive schemes and banking covenants.
The Committee assessed the accounting treatment adopted by management and the application of IAS 19 'Employee Benets' in relation to the Aurum Retirement Benets Scheme. The Committee reviewed the judgements made in respect of the assumptions used in the valuation of the Group's obligations under the scheme and the associated disclosures made in the Financial Statements.
The Committee considered the presentation of the Financial Statements and in particular the use of APMs and the presentation of exceptional items in line with the Group accounting policy. This policy states that adjustments are only made to reported prot when not considered part of the normal operating costs of the business and considered exceptional due their size, nature or incidence.
Each of the above areas of judgement has been identied as an area of focus and therefore the Committee has also reviewed reporting from the External Auditor on the relevant areas.
At the request of the Board, the Committee has considered whether, in its opinion, the Annual Report and Accounts 2025, taken as a whole, are fair, balanced and understandable, and that they provide the information necessary for shareholders to assess the Group's position and performance, business model and strategy. The Group has established internal controls in relation to the process for preparing the Annual Report and Accounts. These include the following:
Following its review, the Committee advised the Board that the Annual Report and Accounts, taken as a whole, were considered to be fair, balanced and understandable and that they provided the information necessary for shareholders to assess the Group's position and performance, business model and strategy. The Committee was also satised that suitable accounting policies have been adopted and appropriate disclosures have been made in the Financial Statements.
The Board has ultimate responsibility for effective management of risk for the Group including determining its risk appetite, identifying key strategic and emerging risks, and reviewing the risk management and internal control framework. The Committee, in supporting the Board to assess the effectiveness of risk management and internal control processes, relies on several different sources to carry out its work including Internal Audit assurance reports, the assurance provided by the External Auditor and other third-parties in specic risk areas.
The Committee monitors and reviews the effectiveness of the Group's risk management processes and internal nancial and non-nancial controls. The key features of the risk management process that were in place during the year are as follows:
The Director of Internal Audit & Risk, who reports directly to the Committee Chair, provides assurance to the Committee through independent reviews of agreed risk areas. The Committee is responsible for overseeing the work of the Internal Audit function. It reviews and approves the scope of the Internal Audit plan and assesses the quality of Internal Audit reports, along with management's actions relating to ndings and the closure of recommended actions.
Each year, a carefully targeted Internal Audit plan is agreed to provide appropriate assurance to the Committee over the effectiveness of risk management and internal control processes across the Group. The Internal Audit plan is risk-based and takes an independent view of what Internal Audit considers to be the highest known and emerging risks and strategic priorities facing the business. The Committee is satised that the Internal Audit plan provides appropriate assurance on the controls in place to manage the principal risks facing the Group. Internal Audit resources continue to be reviewed, with an agreement that external partners would be utilised where subject matter expertise would be most appropriate.
The assessment of the Internal Audit team covered the Internal Audit ndings and reporting, Internal Audit delivery including the Internal Audit plan and whether Internal Audit has sufcient, appropriate resources. In reviewing the effectiveness of Internal Audit, the Audit & Risk Committee considered:
Following assessment by the Committee during the year, the Audit & Risk Committee is satised that the Internal Audit team has the quality, experience and expertise appropriate for the business.
The Group also has an operational audit, loss prevention and security team that reviews compliance with certain key internal procedures in showrooms and at other locations.
One of the Committee's roles is to oversee the relationship with the External Auditor, Ernst & Young LLP (EY), and to evaluate the effectiveness of the service provided and their ongoing independence.
The External Auditor has attended all this year's Committee meetings and at two of those had time with the Committee without management present. The Chair of the Audit & Risk Committee has also met with the external audit partner to review the audit scope and audit ndings.
The Committee had regular open communication with the External Auditor as well as the Group's management.
During the year, the External Auditor reported to the Committee on its independence from the Group.
The Company's independence and objectivity are safeguarded by:
The Committee and the Board are satised that EY has adequate policies and safeguards in place to ensure that the External Auditor objectivity and independence are maintained.
When assessing the independence of the External Auditor, the Committee considers, amongst other things, the length of tenure of the audit rm and the audit partner, the value of non-audit fees provided by the External Auditor and the relationship with the External Auditor as a whole. As part of the assessment of the External Auditor, the Committee considered whether the External Auditor had exercised professional scepticism and an appropriate degree of challenge to management.
The Committee has adopted a formal policy in respect of non-audit services provided by the External Auditor to ensure that Auditor objectivity and independence are maintained, in accordance with the EU Audit Reform.
| Non-audit service | Policy | |
|---|---|---|
| Audit-related services Audit-related services are services, generally of an assurance nature, provided by the Auditor as a result of its expert knowledge and experience of the Group. Audit-related services include: – Reviews of interim nancial statements |
The Auditor is eligible for selection to provide non-audit services to the extent that its skills and experience make it a competitive and most appropriate supplier of these services. |
|
| – Reporting required by law or regulation to be provided by the Auditor – Reports to regulators |
Each new non-audit service must be approved by the Committee in advance of the services being commenced. |
|
| Permissible non-audit services Including, but not limited to: – Work related to mergers, acquisitions, disposals or circulars – Benchmarking services – Corporate governance advice |
Non-audit fees are capped to a maximum aggregate in any nancial year of 70% of the average of the statutory audit fees charged in the previous three consecutive nancial years. In the case of this cap, audit-related services concerning work required by national legislation are excluded. |
|
| Prohibited services In line with the FRC's ethical standards, services where the Auditor's objectivity and independence may be compromised by the threat of self-interest, self-review, management, advocacy, familiarity or intimidation are prohibited. Prohibited services include: |
The Auditor is prohibited from performing these services for the Company or any subsidiary within the Group. |
|
| – Tax services | ||
| – Services that involve playing any part in the management decision-making process | ||
| – Bookkeeping and preparing accounting records and nancial statements | ||
| – Payroll services | ||
| – Designing or implementing internal controls | ||
| – Valuation services (except such services that have no direct effect or are immaterial to the nancial statements) |
||
| – Legal, internal or human resources services | ||
| – Services linked to nancing, capital structure and allocation and investment strategy except providing assurance services in relation to the Financial Statements, such as the issuing of comfort letters in connection with prospectuses issued by the audited entity |
||
| – Promoting, dealing in or underwriting shares in the Company |
Non-audit services provided by EY during the nancial year ending 27 April 2025 were limited to the Half Year Review. Fees in relation to these services were £73,100 (FY24: £66,520).
EY was rst appointed in 2019 following a competitive tender process. This means that FY25 represents EY's sixth year as the Company's External Auditor. Under UK law, as set out in the Companies Act 2006, the Company may retain its External Auditor for up to 20 years with a public tender process every ten years.
The Group conrms that it was in compliance with the provisions of the Statutory Audit Services for Large Companies Market Investigation (Mandatory Use of Competitive Tender Processes and Audit Committee Responsibilities) Order 2014 during the nancial year ended 27 April 2025.
It is the Committee's responsibility to assess the effectiveness of the external audit, including audit quality. The Committee assessed the External Auditor's effectiveness in September 2024 and kept this under review throughout the year taking into account the External Auditor's mindset and culture; skills, character and knowledge; quality control and judgement. The assessment included:
The Committee discussed EY's risk assessment and detailed audit plan in response to those risks. The proposed approach and planned scope of the audit were also reviewed including the proposed materiality. The Committee was satised that the audit plan was robust and covered the nancial reporting risks. The Committee also considered the balance of work completed between the UK, US and European components along with recent acquisitions.
The Committee reviewed and approved the proposed audit fees, which included a detailed breakdown of those fees. This review also considered the level of resources, senior leadership involvement and the use of specialist teams where appropriate. The Committee satised itself that the agreed amount represented fair value in order to deliver the quality and scale of audit sought.
The Committee reviewed the FRC's Audit Quality Inspection and Supervision Report for Ernst & Young LLP and also compared the results of the Auditor to other audit rms. EY presented to the Audit & Risk Committee its feedback on the ndings and planned actions to respond to each of those ndings. The Committee was satised with the outcome of this review.
The Committee also considered how the Auditor had responded to its previous assessments of audit quality.
The Committee considers it important to gather feedback from management, particularly those who are in direct contact with the audit team. Management and Audit & Risk Committee members completed a questionnaire and the results were reviewed by the Committee. The questions covered the following areas:
The feedback received was positive in all areas. Each year the External Auditor meets with management to review the audit process, obtain feedback and make recommendations for improvement in the following year's audit.
Throughout the year, the Committee worked closely with EY and was able to gather a good insight into the overall quality of the audit process and the performance of key individuals within the audit team. This interaction included private sessions with the External Auditor without management present and regular meetings between the Audit & Risk Committee Chair and the Audit Partner. The Committee also considered the quality of the reporting provided by the External Auditor throughout the audit process. This included the robustness and perceptiveness of the Auditor in handling key judgements, responding to questions from the Committee and in its commentary where appropriate on the systems of internal control.
The Committee considered the External Auditor's use of professional scepticism throughout the audit by examining areas in which the External Auditor had challenged Senior Management's assumptions. This was particularly in relation to the key areas of judgement around the signicant nancial reporting areas, noted above, and the number and nature of accounting and control observations raised.
Based on these reviews, the Committee concluded that EY had applied appropriately robust challenge and scepticism throughout the audit, that it possessed the skills and experience required to full its duties effectively and efciently, and that the audit was effective.
The Committee is responsible for considering whether there should be a rotation of the External Auditor in order to ensure continuing auditor quality and independence, including consideration of the advisability and potential impact of conducting a tender process for the appointment of a different External Auditor. The Committee is also responsible for recommending to the Board whether it should ask the shareholders to appoint, reappoint or remove the External Auditor at the AGM.
In its oversight of the external audit, the Committee considered whether it would be appropriate to conduct an audit tender at this time. The Committee took into account:
The Committee also considered EY's leadership and activities in the area of climate change. After due consideration the Committee determined it would not be appropriate to re-tender for the external audit at this time.
EY has expressed willingness to continue in its capacity as independent Auditor of the Company. The Committee has recommended to the Board the reappointment of the External Auditor for the 2026 nancial year and the Directors will be proposing the reappointment of EY at the forthcoming AGM.
The External Auditor is required to rotate the audit engagement partner every ve years. Towards the end of FY24, EY engagement partner, Julie Carlyle, who began her appointment at the commencement of FY20, was replaced by the new engagement partner, Helen McLeod-Jones, who has been appointed with effect from FY25.
CHAIR OF THE AUDIT & RISK COMMITTEE 2 July 2025

| Baroness (Rosa) Monckton MBE (Chair) |
|---|
| Tea Colaianni |
| Ian Carter |
| Brian Duffy |
| Robert Moorhead |
| Chabi Nouri |
The ESG Committee continues to support the Group in making progress across environmental, social and governance strategic initiatives; strengthening compliance and mitigating against risk. These incremental improvements are reected in our rating agency scores.
A personal highlight of mine was joining colleague representatives in an interactive and collaborative Climate Fresk workshop, in my capacity as the Chair of the ESG Committee and also as the designated Non-Executive Director for Workforce Engagement. The workshop, which was delivered by a third-party climate expert, proved to be a fun and powerful way of understanding the scientic ndings of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), while providing an opportunity for quality engagement with colleagues within the organisation.
Guided by the results of our FY24 materiality assessment, we continued to advance the Company's ESG Strategy to ensure the business priorities identied in our assessment remain material. In FY25 the Committee considered a number of new and emerging issues impacting on our business, including the political and legislative landscape. A subsequent review of these issues by key business stakeholders conrmed that the priorities identied in FY24 remained mostly relevant and it was agreed that the Group would continue to manage and monitor all previously identied issues through our ESG Risk Register.
To drive continual improvement, the Committee stays up-to-date with best practice and, during each meeting, the Company's performance is benchmarked against retail peers and leaders in luxury discretionary goods. We remain cognisant of the continually evolving ESG landscape, particularly in light of the macroeconomic backdrop, and that the corporate ESG agenda is becoming increasingly under scrutiny. We monitor this alongside the increasing burden of climate reporting regulation.
I am joined on the ESG Committee by Ian Carter, Chair of the Board, and a majority of independent Non-Executive Directors, comprising Tea Colaianni, Robert Moorhead and Chabi Nouri. Brian Duffy, the Company's CEO, is also a member of the Committee and plays an instrumental role in integrating ESG matters into the Company's business strategy and planning, demonstrating top level commitment from Senior Management in progressing the ESG Strategy.
Biographies of Committee members, including details of their skills and experience, can be found on pages 162 and 163.
The Company Secretary and General Counsel acts as Secretary to the ESG Committee and other Senior Management and/or external advisers may attend by invitation, as appropriate, for all or part of meetings. This includes the CFO, the Head of Sustainability and ESG, the Executive Director, Global Buying and Merchandising and the Executive Director HR.
The role of the Committee is to oversee, on behalf of the Board, the governance of our ESG Strategy. Our ESG Strategy is aligned with best practice and the expectations of our stakeholders and aims to be both inspiring and achievable. Our ESG Strategy is organised into three strategic pillars: (i) People; (ii) Planet; and (iii) Product, to support engagement, and to align with the Group's purpose and values, as well as wider business strategies.
The Committee closely monitors progress against our metrics and targets for all areas of the ESG Strategy including the key performance indicators, set annually in the Modern Slavery Statement. Alongside the Remuneration Committee, the Committee also considers the key areas of strategy which link to the ESG
STRATEGIC REPORT | GOVERNANCE REPORT | FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
underpin, for determining bonus outcomes. Further details on the ESG underpin and its performance can be found in the Directors' Remuneration Report on page 187.
The Committee supports the Audit & Risk Committee and the Remuneration Committee, in respect of ESG-related matters reserved for their remit. The Committee also plays a crucial role in monitoring environmental goals and ensuring actions are taken to mitigate and manage climate-related risks and opportunities by making sure they are embedded in the Company's risk management processes, nancial decision-making and core business strategy.
The ESG Committee is supported by an ESG Steering Group, which is chaired by the CFO. The ESG Steering Group is made up of key members of Senior Management, who each have formal operational responsibility for the management of relevant ESG issues. The ESG Steering Group acts under a separate Terms of Reference and reports progress towards the development, implementation and delivery of the Company's ESG Strategy into the ESG Committee. The ESG Steering Group is supported by a number of working groups which sit under the People, Planet and Product pillars. There is also a governance working group.
In FY25, the Committee continued to oversee the development and delivery of the ESG Strategy, including challenging and collaborating with the Executive Directors and Senior Management, to ensure ESG best practice is integrated into the Company's day-to-day business operations as well as the long-term strategy.
During the year, the Committee was pleased to note the appointment of a new Head of Procurement which is enabling the Company to drive improvements within its Supply Chain Management System. The Committee approved our new Procurement Policy which helps to deliver key ESG goals, and operates alongside revised Supplier Sustainability Standards (the 'Standards') (formerly known as the 'ESG Partner Standards').
The Procurement Policy, Standards and the Vendor Code of Conduct operate simultaneously to support the factory audit programme, which independently audits suppliers on a rotational basis. The Committee receives updates on the audit programme at each meeting. On-site factory audits help safeguard the integrity and reputation of our business operations and partnerships. Specialist independent auditors assess facilities against over 200 indicators consistent with our Vendor Code of Conduct and produce a report with a Low to Critical Risk classication. Following an audit a corrective action is drafted and sent to the supplier for review and comment. After a specied time period, a new audit will take place and if the designated action plan has not been completed, the supplier will be exited from the business. Stricter criteria has been applied this year, including a number of environmental matters, and during the year a number of high-risk suppliers have been audited, the results of which have led to us ceasing our relationships with three suppliers.
The Group participated in the CDP questionnaire on climate change for the third consecutive year and we were pleased to maintain our B Score, demonstrating signicant good environmental management practices, including the management of climate-related risks and opportunities, which is detailed in our TCFD report on page 123 to 126.
While the Committee is disappointed to have missed our annual emission reduction targets, we have achieved our 100% renewable energy target across our Group through the purchase of renewable energy certicates, backed by guarantees of origin. We look forward to realising the benets of a number of new energy management initiatives which were approved in FY25 and will be rolled out in FY26.
Further details on our approach to managing our environmental performance can be found on pages 76 and 77.
As previously reported in last year's Committee Report, the Company participated in its grant-funded programme to explore the use of articial intelligence (AI) technology to supply chain support due diligence and ESG reporting. To advance the Committee's understanding of machine learning technology, a dedicated training session was held with external experts, who explained some of the many business benets including strategic efciency, regulatory agility and reporting automation. The Company recommended to the Committee that the Company entered into a commercial agreement at the close of the project and this was agreed. Further details on our AI project can be found on page 136.
The Committee welcomes feedback from all our stakeholders to ensure their interests are represented in the ongoing development of the Company's ESG Strategy and approach to ESG matters.
Colleagues can share their thoughts through a variety of channels, including Colleague Listening Forums, which I attend, the annual Colleague Engagement Pulse/Surveys, or directly via email or CONNECT – the interactive digital Group engagement platform, which is used to promote and communicate the colleague incentive, GreenVibE, which encourages and rewards positive environmental behaviours.
The Company responds to sustainability rating agency questionnaires received on behalf of investors and facilitates meetings and roadshows to enable investors to ask questions.
The Head of Sustainability and ESG regularly updates the Committee with key external drivers and stakeholder sentiment, and it is also kept up to date with supplier engagement activities to support the promotion of shared sustainability goals and ensure due diligence.
A Materiality Assessment was undertaken towards the end of FY24; the results and action plans were carried out during FY25. A Materiality Assessment is an important way of engaging with all stakeholder groups to identify issues impacting on our business. Issues identied as 'material' through this process were assessed to help the Committee. The results and next steps resulting from this assessment can be found on page 77.
We will continue to monitor the Company's performance and review our approach to ESG matters in FY26 to further enhance the Company's brands, create new business opportunities, help reduce costs, engage stakeholders and ultimately build a successful business that is sustainable over the long-term. This monitoring will take place alongside external factors assessing the future of the ESG agenda as we continue to embed 'doing the right thing, always' into our business as usual practices and processes under the banner of delivering on our Purpose.
Further information on the work of the Committee and the progress being made by the Group can be found on pages 76 and 77.
CHAIR OF THE ESG COMMITTEE 2 July 2025

| Members | Independent | No. of meetings attended |
|---|---|---|
| Tea Colaianni (Chair) | 3/3 | |
| Ian Carter | 3/3 | |
| Baroness (Rosa) Monckton MBE | 3/3 | |
| Robert Moorhead | 3/3 | |
| Section | Page | |
| Chair's statement | 187 | |
| Wider workforce considerations | 190 | |
| At a glance | 192 | |
| Annual Report on Remuneration | 194 | |
| 2025 Directors' Remuneration Policy | 200 |
The Remuneration Committee's Terms of Reference at: thewosgroupplc.com

On behalf of the Remuneration Committee, I am pleased to present the Group's Remuneration Committee Report for the nancial year ended 27 April 2025.
FY25 was: a year of strong strategic and operational progress for the Group, which saw the US business continuing its strong momentum, and the UK returning to growth.
We remain condent that our strategy, exceptional client experience and strong brand relationships will enable us to continue to drive growth. I would like to thank all colleagues for their continued work and dedication during the year.
The annual salary review process took place in November 2024, in line with our normal review timing. The UK salary review saw an increase of 3% for our colleagues below Senior Management level. The salary review in the US saw an increase of 3% for both Support Centre and retail colleagues.
In the UK, following our accreditation with the Living Wage Foundation, we invested £0.7 million in salary increases for over 680 colleagues across retail and support functions, to bring them in line with the 2024-2025 Real Living Wage rates.
The CEO and CFO elected once again, not to receive an increase in base salary.
The Chair and Non-Executive Director fees were reviewed in December 2024, and it was once again agreed that there would be no increase in their fees.
The executive performance target for the FY25 annual bonus was based on Adjusted EBIT, with an ESG underpin. Adjusted EBIT for FY25 was £149.7 million, this falls between the threshold and target performance levels and there will be a bonus at 24.2% of maximum paid in respect of FY25.
The Remuneration Committee assessed progress against our ESG Strategy using the ESG underpin agreed at the start of the nancial year. The key highlights included:
Overall, the Committee considered that the progress against our ESG strategy in FY25 was positive. The Committee therefore determined that the ESG underpin has been met and there would be no downwards adjustment to the formulaic bonus outcome.
Full details on the performance outturn against the targets are shown in the 'At a glance' section on pages 192 and 193.
1 This is an Alternative Performance Measure. Refer to Glossary on pages 270 to 273 for denitions and reconciliation to statutory measures.
The LTIP grants awarded in July 2022 were based 80% on three-year cumulative Adjusted EPS1 and 20% on three-year average ROCE performance.
The performance targets were set taking into account internal and external expectations of performance at the time. The macroeconomic backdrop over the performance period has resulted in tough trading conditions in the UK this year, resulting in cumulative Adjusted EPS of 132.3p and three-year average ROCE of 22.1%. As such, 0% of the LTIP award is due to vest in July 2025.
Our Remuneration Policy was last approved by shareholders at the 2022 AGM where it received strong support (98.15%). In line with the normal three-year cycle, we are submitting a new Remuneration Policy for shareholder approval this AGM. Following a comprehensive review the Committee has concluded that for now the current Policy remains t-for-purpose and continues to support the execution of our long-term strategy and the continued generation of sustainable shareholder value. Key features remain as follows:
We are proposing an amendment to our approach to annual bonus deferral to reect developing market practice in this area. The Committee proposes that where Executive Directors have met their shareholding requirements in full, annual bonus awards will typically be made fully in cash rather than part being deferred into shares. Where an Executive Director has not met their shareholding guidelines, they would still be required to defer one-third of their annual bonus into shares to support building their shareholding and to increase alignment with shareholder interests.
This change will simplify the annual bonus structure and better align us with international market practice, whilst still ensuring strong shareholder alignment through existing shareholding guidelines. The Committee's view is that both deferral and shareholding guidelines ensure strong alignment to shareholders and it is not necessary to have further deferral of annual bonus awards where Executives already hold substantial holdings in the Company. Both Executive Directors currently have signicant shareholdings, very considerably above the listed market average and in excess of our Executive Director shareholding guidelines (200%). Our Remuneration Policy continues to include other best practice features that further reinforce stewardship and creates shareholder alignment including a two-year holding period on the LTIP, post-employment shareholding requirements and recovery provisions to avoid payments for failure. While only a minor change is proposed to the Policy at this stage, the Committee is conscious that we are operating in a rapidly changing macroeconomic context for both the luxury sector and UK pay governance. The Group is also continuing to evolve with US revenue increasing to 48% of total Group revenue. The Committee therefore intends to keep the Policy under careful review and it may be necessary to make further changes to the Policy within the three-year life of the Policy. Should the need to make further changes arise we will consult with our shareholders at that time. We maintain an ongoing dialogue with shareholders to understand their views and sought feedback from our major shareholders as we developed this Remuneration Policy.
Salary reviews for all colleagues in the UK and US Support Centres took place in November 2024 and the next support and retail colleague review will be in November 2025.
The annual bonus will be determined in line with the normal cycle. For FY26, the annual bonus will continue to be based on Adjusted EBIT and the ESG underpin will continue to apply for FY26. The underpin will focus on key metrics under our three main ESG pillars:
This ESG underpin will inform the Committee's decision of whether or not to apply a downwards adjustment of up to 10% to the formulaic FY26 annual bonus outcome in order to take into account the wider ESG performance of the Group. Key factors considered by the Committee will be disclosed retrospectively in next year's Annual Report and Accounts, in line with best practice.
Due to the ongoing market volatility the Committee has not yet nalised the LTIP targets for FY26 awards. These targets will be set prior to grant and will be disclosed, at the latest, in the RNS at the time of the award. No changes are proposed to the LTIP award levels and these will continue to be 200% of base salary for the CEO and 175% of base salary for the CFO. In line with last year's grant, the LTIP measures will be based on a three-year cumulative Adjusted EPS and three-year average ROCE with weightings of 80% and 20% of maximum respectively. ROCE is a Key Performance Indicator (KPI) and measures the efciency with which the Group is able to utilise its capital. Strong average ROCE performance combined with continued growth in earnings is critical in ensuring the successful execution of our long-term strategy and growth ambitions.
1 This is an Alternative Performance Measure. Refer to Glossary on pages 270 to 273 for denitions and reconciliation to statutory measures.
The Watches of Switzerland Group always strives to be an organisation that is inclusive, rewarding and fair to all colleagues. It is the unwavering commitment from our colleagues that has been critical to the Group as we navigated the trading conditions across luxury retail. During this time, the Committee has been acutely aware of the challenges our colleagues have been facing because of the macroeconomic environment.
The Watches of Switzerland Group continues to be an organisation that values all colleagues across the business and is particularly mindful of the circumstances of those on the lowest salaries. We were proud to retain our Living Wage Foundation accreditation in FY25, making a commitment to paying all our UK colleagues the minimum real living wage to ensure that they receive sufcient income to meet their basic needs. In the US, we pay above state minimum to all our colleagues.
We launched a new communication strategy in FY25 which creates a further opportunity for two-way communication across the Group. Town halls have been attended by Baroness (Rosa) Monckton MBE in her capacity as the Designated Non-Executive Director for Workforce Engagement, which included question and answer sessions and review of colleague feedback.
In the US, we were pleased to conrm 100% participation in the new benets platform enrolment and we have increased maternity leave to provide greater nancial support to parents.
In the UK, we continue to provide the Watches of Switzerland Group Support Fund, which offers nancial support by way of a loan for those most impacted by the cost-of-living crisis.
We will continue to monitor this area and make adjustments as necessary to support ongoing retention and motivation in a challenging macroeconomic and talent environment.
2 July 2025 As a Remuneration Committee, it is our responsibility to make decisions which support the Group's long-term business strategy, and which align with the Group's culture and values. We must balance this with our desire to reect best practice remuneration and high standards of corporate governance. In addition to its usual activities, key areas of focus for the Committee in FY25 have been:
I would like to take this opportunity to thank our shareholders for their support of our Directors' Remuneration Report at our 2024 AGM which received 94% of votes cast in favour. We recognise that executive remuneration is an area of public interest and we have worked hard to ensure that full transparency has been provided in this year's Directors' Remuneration Report on the Group's remuneration practices and our new Remuneration Policy.
In addition to the policy, the remainder of the Remuneration Report is split into three parts:
This section contains discussions on the Company's initiatives in colleague and stakeholder engagement. In addition, we have included a report on specic areas in relation to wider workforce remuneration which the Committee reviewed during the course of the year.
The 'At a glance' section provides a summary of the payments made to the Executive Directors during FY25.
This section summarises remuneration decisions during the past year. This includes details of annual bonus and long-term incentive awards granted and vesting during the year.
I hope that you will nd this year's report clear, transparent and informative. If you wish to discuss any aspect of this Remuneration Report, I would be happy to hear from you. You can contact me through our Company Secretary and General Counsel, Laura Battley. I will also be available at the Company's AGM at 2.30pm on Wednesday 3 September 2025 to answer any questions.
On behalf of the Remuneration Committee and the Board.
TEA COLAIANNI CHAIR OF THE REMUNERATION COMMITTEE
As part of our commitment to fairness, openness and inclusivity, as in previous years, we have included this dedicated section to provide more information on our communication with colleagues, our remuneration principles and wider workforce pay conditions.
We have a number of channels where colleagues' views on remuneration can be captured. For example, colleagues are able to express their views through the Company's Colleague Engagement Surveys and through two-way communication channels in the UK and the US. We are committed to giving our colleagues a voice and they have always had the opportunity to interact with our Directors. We have a dedicated Designated Non-Executive Director for Workforce Engagement, Baroness (Rosa) Monckton MBE, responsible for gathering our colleagues' views and presenting these to the Board.
Our Listening Forums have been replaced by skip-level meetings chaired by Baroness (Rosa) Monckton in the UK and the US which involves open two-way conversation without senior levels of management. This gives Rosa an opportunity to ask questions in an informal setting about culture and organisation and any other issues.
A process was introduced in 2020, which enables the Remuneration Committee to carry out its oversight and review of wider workforce pay and policies, and to ensure that they are designed to support the Company's desired culture and values. When conducting its annual review, the Remuneration Committee is paying particular attention to:
Once the Remuneration Committee has conducted its review of the wider workforce remuneration and incentives, it will consider the approach applied to the remuneration of the Executive Directors and Senior Management. In particular, the Remuneration Committee is focused on whether the approach to the remuneration of the Executive Directors and Senior Management is consistent with that applied to the wider workforce.
The Remuneration Committee remains satised that the approach to remuneration across the Group is consistent with the Company's principles of remuneration. Furthermore, in the Remuneration Committee's opinion, the approach to executive remuneration aligns with the wider Company pay policy and there are no anomalies specic to the Executive Directors excluding the fact that, since the IPO in 2019, the Executive Directors have elected not to receive salary increases or pension.
UK legislation requires employers with more than 250 employees to disclose information on their gender pay gap on an annual basis. We have published our seventh disclosure of the pay gap based on amounts paid in the April 2024 payroll. The bonus gap was based on incentives paid in the year to 31 March 2024.
The mean gender pay gap at the Group is 16%, compared to 20% last year. The median bonus gap at the Group is 25%, compared to 42% last year. Whilst there is still a way to go, we are encouraged by the result. The full report, including details on the initiatives we have underway to help close our gender pay gap, is available on our website thewosgroupplc.com
The following table sets out a summary of the information received by the Remuneration Committee on the Group's remuneration structure:
| Element of remuneration |
Overview of practice at the Watches of Switzerland Group PLC |
|---|---|
| Alignment with remuneration principles |
The Group's remuneration principles are designed to enable fair and exible reward structures to be developed and implemented across the entire organisation. We continue to review and redesign our policies in line with this principle. |
| Salary | Salaries are set to reect the market value of the role, and to aid recruitment and retention. Remuneration for all UK colleagues is above the Real Living Wage. We also closely monitor the rates of pay of people who are training with us to make sure they remain fair and competitive. |
| Salary increases are normally awarded annually following the Company's main pay review and are typically between 2% and 3%. This year, our UK Support Centre pay review delivered an increase of 3% for all colleagues below Senior Management level. We also implemented adjustments in support and retail salaries to comply with our commitment to the Real Living Wage. Typically, the Executive Directors will receive no more than the same percentage increase as the wider workforce. The US awarded pay increases of 3% to support and retail colleagues. |
|
| From time to time, ad hoc pay reviews are conducted in order to make market or inationary adjustments and ensure the Company's targeted living wage differential is maintained. |
| Element of remuneration |
Overview of practice at the Watches of Switzerland Group PLC | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Annual variable pay |
All Watches of Switzerland Group colleagues are entitled to earn variable pay linked to stretching performance targets: |
|||
| Annual bonus plan Subject to service and eligibility, our colleagues in support functions participate in the Company's annual bonus plan and are rewarded based on nancial performance measured using Adjusted EBIT. As outlined in last year's Directors' Remuneration Report, a robust ESG underpin applies to annual bonus awards. |
||||
| Bonuses typically operate in one of three formats depending on the level of seniority and line-of-sight to performance: |
||||
| – For roles with a global remit, bonuses are based 100% on Group performance |
||||
| – For roles that wholly or mainly concentrate on either our UK or US operations, bonuses are based 100% on the performance of the business in the relevant country |
||||
| In line with market practice, the bonus quantum and the question of whether it is paid solely in cash or in a mixture of cash and deferred shares depends on the level of seniority of the colleague. |
||||
| Bonuses to eligible colleagues are normally paid in July, when performance conditions have been met. |
||||
| Sales commission plans A range of plans exist for our retail team members which reect the size and complexity of the showrooms. Targets can be based on individual objectives for larger showrooms or team-based objectives for smaller showrooms. The majority of these plans are paid monthly and biannually. |
||||
| We review these schemes periodically to ensure they adhere to our reward principles and support good client outcomes. |
||||
| LTIP | The LTIP is currently available to Executive Directors and Senior Management. LTIP awards are normally granted annually. Malus and clawback provisions are in place. |
|||
| The vesting period is three years and all LTIP participants are subject to an additional two-year holding period. Eligible colleagues and details of the award opportunity are set out below. |
||||
| Level | No. of eligible colleagues |
Targeted ranges (% of salary) |
||
| Group CEO | 1 | 200% | ||
| Group CFO | 1 | 175% | ||
| Senior Management | 18 | 20–80% | ||
| Pension | The Company operates a UK dened contribution pension arrangement, which all UK employees are entitled to participate in. |
|||
| The Executive Directors are entitled to receive an employer pension contribution of 3% of salary, which is aligned with the level available to the majority of the wider workforce in the UK. The CEO and the CFO waive their employer pension contributions. |
||||
| Arrangements for US employees vary depending on territory. In some locations, the Company offers a 3% 401k employer match and in other locations a 2% match is offered. |
| Element of remuneration |
Overview of practice at the Watches of Switzerland Group PLC |
|---|---|
| Benets | We offer a suite of benets across the Group, which are designed to be appropriate for different roles and functions and countries. These include health insurance (for all US colleagues and some UK colleagues), and in the UK, season ticket loans, a cycle to work scheme, a Health Cash Plan and UK and US enhanced maternity leave. Life cover is offered to varying degrees depending on grade and region. |
| We operate an Employee Assistance Programme (EAP) in the UK and US. This is intended to help employees deal with any personal problems that may adversely impact their work performance, health and/or wellbeing and nancial support. All of our colleagues are entitled to staff discounts, subject to the rules of the relevant schemes. |
|
| All-employee share schemes |
Our colleagues are able to participate in our employee sharesave schemes in the UK and US. |
A summary of the Company's general policies is as follows:
| Policy | Description |
|---|---|
| Reward | We have an ethical pay policy, whereby we ensure that our pay rates are ahead of the Real Living Wage in the UK and we periodically benchmark salaries against market data. We have implemented interim reviews for relevant groups of colleagues when deemed necessary to guarantee compliance with the legislation, and to ensure that our pay rates remain competitive with those of our main competitors. |
| Recognition and celebration |
Our UK recognition programme, VibE, provides all colleagues with the ability to recognise and celebrate achievements across the colleague population instantly via a digital platform. CONNECT, our internal community based social platform, provides Company news, and enables our colleagues to recognise and celebrate achievements across the Group. |
| Development opportunities |
We are proud of our wide range of training and development programmes in the UK and US and we work closely with our brand partners to ensure that our colleagues are true experts in our category. Our e-learning modules make learning and personal development accessible to all. |
| Equal opportunities and diversity initiatives |
The Company is committed to an active Diversity & Inclusion Policy from recruitment and selection to training and development, performance reviews and promotion. All decisions relating to employment practices are objective, free from bias and based solely upon work criteria and individual merit. The Company is responsive to the needs of its colleagues, clients and the community. We are an organisation that seeks to make use of everyone's talents and abilities, and where diversity is valued. The Company ensures that its promotion and recruitment practices are fair and objective and encourages the continuous development and training, as well as the provision of equal opportunities for the training and career development, of all colleagues. Further details of this are shown on pages 176 and 177. |
191
AT A GLANCE
Our reward strategy is designed to support and reinforce our purpose and values, and to reward all of our colleagues for delivering against our strategic objectives. The remuneration principles that we have developed across the Group are cascaded throughout the organisation.
| Current Directors' Remuneration Policy | ||
|---|---|---|
| Fixed | Salary Reects the value of the individual, their role, skills, experience and contribution to the business |
|
| Benets | ||
| Aligned with all other colleague arrangements | ||
| Pension | ||
| Alignment of employer pension contributions with the wider workforce at 3%. The CEO and CFO waive their employer pension contribution | ||
| Variable | Annual bonus plan | |
| Incentivises achievement of annual objectives and aligns Director and shareholder interests by ensuring share ownership for Executive Directors | ||
| LTIP | ||
| Provides alignment with shareholders and motivates key individuals to achieve long-term targets and deliver sustainable performance |
The following diagram shows the link between our Remuneration Policy and our strategy through looking at our KPIs, which measure the successful implementation of that strategy and the performance conditions we use for our incentive plans. Our FY25 performance against our KPIs is also shown below:

Reects the successful delivery of our Adjusted EBIT KPI subject to an ESG underpin, which can reduce the bonus up to 10% taking into account progress against our ESG strategy
Reects the successful delivery of a number of KPIs over the long-term: Adjusted EPS and ROCE
| Total compensation | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Brian Duffy (CEO) | Anders Romberg (CFO) | ||||
| Salary: | £500,000 | Salary: | £380,000 | ||
| Taxable benets:1 | £28,771 | Taxable benets:1 | £6,177 | ||
| Annual bonus:2 | £181,500 | Annual bonus:2 | £114,950 | ||
| LTIP:3 | – | LTIP:3 | – | ||
| Pension: | – | Pension: | – | ||
| Total: | £710,271 | Total: | £501,127 |
1 Taxable benets include one or more of private healthcare, accommodation when attending different ofces, company car (including private fuel) or a car allowance.
2 A bonus payment is to be awarded for FY25, based on 24.2% of maximum potential with two-thirds payable in cash and one-third deferred shares.
3 The FY23 LTIP awards have not met the performance conditions and 0% will vest.
For further detail refer to page 195.
| Threshold | Target | Maximum | Percentage of | Bonus value achieved | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | performance required (20% of |
performance required (50% of |
performance required (100% of |
Actual | maximum performance |
|||
| condition | Weighting | max bonus) | max bonus) | max bonus) | performance | achieved | Brian Duœy | Anders Romberg |
| Adjusted EBIT | 100% | £148.6m | £156.4m | £164.2m | £149.7m | 24.2% | £181,500 | £114,950 |
For further detail refer to page 195.
The LTIP awards granted in July 2022 were based 80% on three-year cumulative Adjusted EPS and 20% on three-year average ROCE performance.
As a result of Adjusted EPS and ROCE performance over the three-year performance period, 0% of the LTIP award is due to vest in July 2025.
| Threshold performance | Target performance | Maximum | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| required (20% of max | required (60% of max | performance required | Actual | |||
| Performance condition | Weighting | LTIP) | LTIP) | (100% of max LTIP) | performance | Vesting level |
| Cumulative Adjusted Earnings Per Share | 80% | 166.2p | 175.0p | 183.7p | 132.3p | 0% |
| Average ROCE | 20% | 26.4% | 27.8% | 29.2% | 22.1% | 0% |
For further detail of the performance outcomes refer to page 195.
No malus nor clawback provisions in relation to any element of Directors' remuneration were used during the year under review.
The table below sets out the single total gure of remuneration and breakdown for each Director in respect of FY25. Figures provided have been calculated in accordance with the UK disclosure requirements: The Large and Medium-Sized Companies and Groups (Accounts and Reports) (Amendment) Regulations 2019 (Schedule 8 to the Regulations).
| Name | Period | Salary/fees £ |
Taxable bene¡ts1 £ |
Bonus2 £ |
LTIP3 £ |
Pension4 £ |
Other £ |
Total £ |
Total ¡xed remuneration £ |
Total variable remuneration £ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Executive Directors | ||||||||||
| Brian Duffy | FY25 | 500,000 | 28,771 | 181,500 | – | – | – | 710,271 | 528,771 | 181,500 |
| FY24 | 500,000 | 25,190 | – | 347,770 | – | – | 872,960 | 525,190 | 347,770 | |
| Anders Romberg5 | FY25 | 380,000 | 6,177 | 114,950 | – | – | – | 501,127 | 386,177 | 114,950 |
| FY24 | 377,082 | 8,523 | – | 41,415 | – | – | 427,020 | 385,605 | 41,415 | |
| Non-Executive Directors6 | ||||||||||
| Ian Carter | FY25 | 190,000 | 8,577 | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | 198,577 | 198,577 | n/a |
| FY24 | 190,000 | 19,820 | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | 209,820 | 209,820 | n/a | |
| Tea Colaianni | FY25 | 82,500 | – | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | 82,500 | 82,500 | n/a |
| FY24 | 82,500 | 230 | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | 82,730 | 82,730 | n/a | |
| Robert Moorhead | FY25 | 72,500 | 155 | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | 72,655 | 72,655 | n/a |
| FY24 | 72,500 | – | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | 72,500 | 72,500 | n/a | |
| Baroness (Rosa) | FY25 | 72,500 | 283 | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | 72,783 | 72,783 | n/a |
| Monckton MBE | FY24 | 72,500 | – | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | 72,500 | 72,500 | n/a |
| Chabi Nouri | FY25 | 60,000 | 1,301 | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | 61,301 | 61,301 | n/a |
| FY24 | 60,000 | 3,848 | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | 63,848 | 63,848 | n/a |
1 Taxable benets for Executive Directors includes one or more of: private healthcare; accommodation when attending different ofces; company car (including private fuel); or a car allowance.
Healthcare provision for Executive Directors was enhanced effective 23 December 2024. Taxable benets for Non-Executive Directors includes reimbursement for travel and accommodation costs. 2 The annual bonus is paid two-thirds in cash and one-third in shares, with the portion deferred into shares subject to continued employment for three years but with no further performance conditions attached.
3 The FY23 LTIP award will vest at 0% of maximum due to the performance conditions not being met. The value of the FY22 LTIP award which vested in FY24 has been updated to reect the share price on the exercise date of 7 April 2025, being £3.276.
4 The CEO and CFO waive their employer pension contributions.
5 Anders Romberg retired as CFO and as an Executive Director of the Board with effect from 1 January 2022. On 12 May 2023 he rejoined the Board and replaced Bill Floydd as CFO. The increased salary in comparison to FY24 is as a result of the annualisation of his remuneration. The FY24 LTIP value shown reects the proportion of the LTIP award he retained (12,642) shares of the original 65,021 shares granted.
6 Non-Executive Director fees include fees in respect of committee meetings. There has been no increase in respect of any of the individual fee components.
The maximum bonus opportunity for the CEO and CFO for FY25 was 150% and 125% of salary respectively. Two-thirds of the bonus award is paid out in cash with the remaining one-third deferred into shares and subject to a three-year vesting period.
Details of the targets used to determine bonuses in respect of FY25 and the extent to which they were satised are shown in the table below:
| Threshold | Target | Maximum | Percentage of | Bonus value achieved | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| performance | performance | performance | maximum | |||||
| Performance | required (20% of | required (50% of | required (100% of | Actual | performance | |||
| condition | Weighting | max bonus) | max bonus) | max bonus) | performance | achieved | Brian Duœy | Anders Romberg |
| Adjusted EBIT | 100% | £148.6m | £156.4m | £164.2m | £149.7m | 24.2% | £181,500 | £114,950 |
Included in our bonus pay-out, in line with best practice and as disclosed in last year's report, the Remuneration Committee assessed progress against our ESG Strategy using the ESG underpin developed at the start of the year. The key highlights included:
– Caring for our Planet – We have reduced our Scope 1 and 2 market-based emissions year-on-year and implemented a new energy management system
Overall, the Committee considered that the progress against our ESG Strategy in FY25 was positive and we have delivered continuous improvements across our environmental and social activities in FY25. The Committee therefore determined that the ESG underpin has been met and it has not resulted in any downwards adjustment to the formulaic bonus outcome.
LTIP awards granted in July 2022 were subject to performance to the end of FY25. Details of the three-year cumulative Adjusted EPS and three-year average ROCE targets attached to these awards and the extent to which they were satised are shown in the table below. EPS and ROCE performance was below the stretching thresholds and therefore no portion of this award will vest. A two-year holding period applies to long-term incentive awards following vesting.
| Threshold | Target | Maximum | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Performance condition | Weighting | performance required (20% of max LTIP) |
performance required (60% of max LTIP) |
performance required (100% of max LTIP) |
Actual performance |
Vesting level |
| Cumulative Adjusted EPS | 80% | 166.2p | 175.0p | 183.7p | 132.3p | 0% |
| Average ROCE | 20% | 26.4% | 27.8% | 29.2% | 22.1% | 0% |
The table below sets out the details of the long-term incentive awards granted in FY25, where vesting will be determined according to the achievement of performance conditions that will be tested based on three-year performance to the end of FY27.
| Name | Award type |
Basis on which award made |
Shares awarded |
Percentage of award vesting at threshold performance (%) |
Maximum percentage of face value that could vest (%) |
Performance conditions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Brian Duffy | Nil-cost options | 200% of annual salary | 241,429 | 20% | 100% | EPS (80%) ROCE (20%) |
| Anders Romberg | Nil-cost options | 175% annual of salary | 160,550 | 20% | 100% | EPS (80%) ROCE (20%) |
The awards were granted on 8 July 2024; the face value is calculated with reference to a share price of £4.14, being the closing share price on 5 July 2024.
Awards are based 80% on three-year cumulative Adjusted EPS and 20% on three-year average ROCE over the period FY25 to FY27. Targets are as follows:
– Cumulative Adjusted EPS: 178.2p (Threshold); 187.6p (Target); 196.9p (Maximum)
– Average ROCE: 22.7% (Threshold); 23.9% (Target); 25.1% (Maximum)
| Shares held directly | Deferred | Shareholding requirement | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Name | Current shareholding |
Bene¡cially owned |
shares not subject to performance conditions |
LTIP vested but not yet exercised |
LTIP interests subject to performance conditions |
LTIP interests not subject to performance conditions |
% Salary | Shareholding requirement met? |
|
| Executive Directors | |||||||||
| Brian Duffy | 8,511,459 | 8,511,459 | 58,112 | – | 524,038 | – | 200% | Yes | |
| Anders Romberg | 1,494,236 | 1,494,236 | 12,853 | – | 259,877 | – | 175% | Yes | |
| Non-Executive Directors | |||||||||
| Ian Carter | 182,200 | 182,200 | – | – | – | – | n/a | n/a | |
| Tea Colaianni | 32,947 | 32,947 | – | – | – | – | n/a | n/a | |
| Robert Moorhead | 30,620 | 30,620 | – | – | – | – | n/a | n/a | |
| Baroness (Rosa) Monckton MBE | 8,904 | 8,904 | – | – | – | – | n/a | n/a | |
| Chabi Nouri | – | – | – | – | – | – | n/a | n/a |
There have been no changes to shareholdings between 27 April 2025 and the date of this Report.
The market price of shares at 25 April 2025 was £3.59 and the range during FY25 was £3.25 to £5.92.
No payments were made to past Directors or for loss of ofce in FY25.
Our CEO to employee pay ratios for FY20 to FY25 are set out in the table below:
| Financial year | Method used | 25th percentile pay ratio |
50th percentile pay ratio |
75th percentile pay ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FY25 (reported) | Option A | 27:1 | 24:1 | 19:1 |
| FY24 (reported) | Option A | 37:1 | 32:1 | 25:1 |
| FY23 (reported) | Option A | 144:1 | 124:1 | 92:1 |
| FY22 (reported) | Option A | 206:1 | 174:1 | 128:1 |
| FY21 (reported) | Option A | 61:1 | 51:1 | 37:1 |
| FY20 (reported) | Option A | 317:1 | 262:1 | 179:1 |
Details of salary and total pay and benets as required under the regulations are set out below: CEO base salary: £500,000
CEO total pay and benets: £710,271
| Total pay and | ||
|---|---|---|
| Employee ¡gures (£'000) | Salary | bene¡ts |
| 25th percentile employee | 36.8 | 37.9 |
| 50th percentile employee | 29.0 | 29.5 |
| 75th percentile employee | 24.8 | 26.2 |
The Company has used Option A to calculate the CEO pay ratio. The Company feels that using comparable single gure data ensures the most like for like comparison of CEO pay against the pay levels of employees at the 25th, 50th and 75th percentiles. We have determined the individuals at the 25th, 50th and 75th percentiles as at 27 April 2025, the last day of the nancial year.
The CEO pay ratio gap has decreased during the year, and while this is inuenced by a number of factors, a key inuence is the fact that there is no LTIP vesting this year compared to a full vesting of the award which vested last year.
The value of the LTIP vesting in respect of FY25 is £nil due to the performance conditions not being met.
In addition, we expect the ratios could be fairly volatile for the following reasons:
– The CEO's pay is made up of a greater proportion of incentive pay than for employees generally, and this leads to a higher degree of variability in his overall pay each year
– LTIPs are provided in shares, and therefore a change in share price over the three years changes the value of a long-term incentive award vesting in any given year
We recognise that the ratio is driven by the different structure of the pay of our CEO versus that of our colleagues generally, as well as the make-up of our workforce. What is important from our perspective is that this ratio is inuenced only by the differences in structure, and not by divergence in xed pay between the CEO and wider workforce. The Remuneration Committee reviews information about colleague pay, reward and progression policies of the Company and is comfortable that the median pay ratio is consistent with these policies.
In determining the quartile gures, the hourly rates were annualised using the same number of contractual hours as the CEO. Actual pay and benets were calculated for all UK colleagues at the snapshot date and subsequently ranked in order to identify the relevant person at each quartile. For the purpose of the calculations the following elements of pay were included (if applicable) for all colleagues:
The table below shows how the percentage change in each Director's salary/fees, taxable benets and annual bonus from FY20 to FY25 compares with the average percentage change in each of those components of pay for the UK-based employees of the Group as a whole.
The reporting regulations prescribe that all employees of the listed company, excluding Directors, should be included in the average employee calculation. However, as the Watches of Switzerland Group PLC does not have any colleagues other than the two Executive Directors, no statutory disclosure can be provided in respect of colleagues. Therefore, the Company has chosen to voluntarily disclose the information in the table below using UK full time colleagues as the comparator group; this group was chosen on the basis that the majority of our workforce is UK-based.
Year-on-year changes in pay for Directors compared to the average UK colleague increase:
| FY20 to FY21 | FY21 to FY22 | FY22 to FY23 | FY23 to FY24 | FY24 to FY25 | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Name | Salary/ fees |
Taxable benets |
Annual bonus |
Salary/ fees |
Taxable benets |
Annual bonus |
Salary/ fees |
Taxable benets |
Annual bonus |
Salary/ fees |
Taxable benets |
Annual bonus |
Salary/ fees |
Taxable benets |
Annual bonus |
| Executive Directors | |||||||||||||||
| Brian Duffy | 0% | 2.7% | n/a | 4.3% | (0.6)% | 4.3% | 0% | 6.9% | (25.0)% | 0% | 1.2% (100.0)% | 0% | 14.2% | 100% | |
| Anders Romberg1 | 0% | (43.0)% | n/a | (30.4)% | (27.7)% | (30.4)% | n/a | n/a | n/a | 100.0% | 100.0% | n/a | 0.8%1 | (27.5)% | 100% |
| Non-Executive Directors | |||||||||||||||
| Ian Carter | n/a | n/a | n/a | 0% | 0% | n/a | 0% | 28.7% | n/a | 0% | 128.2% | n/a | 0% | (56.7)% | n/a |
| Tea Colaianni | 0% | n/a | n/a | 10.0%2 | 0% | n/a | 1.0%2 100.0% | n/a | 0% | (83.0)% | n/a | 0% (100.0)% | n/a | ||
| Robert Moorhead | 0% | n/a | n/a | 10.8%2 | 0% | n/a | 1.2%2 | 0% | n/a | 0% | 0% | n/a | 0% | 100.0% | n/a |
| Baroness (Rosa) Monckton MBE | 0% | n/a | n/a | 18.3%2 | 0% | n/a | 2.4%2 | 0% | n/a | 0% | 0% | n/a | 0% | 100.0% | n/a |
| Chabi Nouri | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | 100.0% | 100.0% | n/a | 1.4%3 (18.0)% | n/a | 0% | (66.2)% | n/a | |
| Average percentage increase for UK employees |
5.0% | 4.0% | n/a | 9% | (15.5)% | 35% | 9.1% | (14.4)% | (48.3)% | 12.5% | 15.9% (100.0)% | 5.0% | (10.0)%4 | 100% |
1 Anders Romberg retired as CFO and as an Executive Director of the Board with effect from 1 January 2022. On 12 May 2023 he rejoined the Board and replaced Bill Floydd as CFO. The increased salary in comparison to FY24 is as a result of the annualisation of his remuneration.
2 Changes in pay for the Non-Executive Directors related to the introduction of the ESG Committee part way through FY22. There have been no increases in Non-Executive Director fees over the year.
3 Chabi Nouri was appointed as an independent Non-Executive Director with effect from 1 May 2022. The increase in FY24 was as a result of the annualisation of her remuneration.
4 The reduction in taxable benets is due to a move to more efcient eet cars.
The graph shows the Group's TSR performance (share price plus dividends paid) compared with the performance of the FTSE 250 (excluding Investment Trusts) Index and the FTSE 350 General Retailers, since the Company's IPO in June 2019. These indices have been selected because the Company believes that the constituent companies are the most appropriate for this comparison for the Group. This chart will be built out in future reports until it provides a picture of performance over ten years.

The Remuneration Committee does not believe that the remuneration paid whilst the Company was private is relevant to the remuneration following IPO. As such, this table shows remuneration from FY20, the rst nancial year when the Company was listed. We will add to this table each year until a full ten-year history is shown
| Financial year | Single ¡gure of remuneration |
% of max annual bonus earned |
% of max LTIP awards vesting |
|---|---|---|---|
| FY25 – Brian Duffy | £710,271 | 24% | 0% |
| FY24 – Brian Duffy | £872,960 | 0% | 100% |
| FY23 – Brian Duffy | £3,329,581 | 75% | 100% |
| FY22 – Brian Duffy | £4,547,352 | 100% | 100% |
| FY21 – Brian Duffy | £1,221,337 | 100% | n/a |
| FY20 – Brian Duffy excluding one-off IPO award |
£6,512,387 (£512,388) |
0% | n/a |
The table below shows the percentage change in total colleague pay expenditure and shareholder distribution (i.e. dividends and share buybacks) from 28 April 2024 to 27 April 2025.
| Relative importance of the spend on pay | FY25 £m |
FY24 £m |
% change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Colleague remuneration | £170.1 | £149.4 | 13.9% |
| Distribution to shareholders (share buyback) | £11.3 | – | 100.0% |
The Company commenced a share buyback programme on 10 March 2025 which was completed on 18 June 2025 (refer to note 21 of the Consolidated Financial Statements for further detail).
The FY25 Directors' Remuneration Report will be subject to a shareholder vote at the 2025 AGM. The table below sets out the actual voting in respect of resolutions regarding remuneration at previous Annual General Meetings.
| Votes for | % for | Votes against | % against | Total votes Votes withheld | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Approve the 2024 Directors' Remuneration Report (2024 AGM) | 175,413,162 | 93.71% | 11,776,624 | 6.29% | 187,189,786 | 21,340 |
| Approve the 2022 Directors' Remuneration Policy (2023 AGM) | 189,914,532 | 98.15% | 3,583,126 | 1.85% | 193,685,453 | 187,795 |
The Committee complies with the UK Corporate Governance Code 2018 in terms of composition and Terms of Reference. The Committee's Terms of Reference, which are reviewed annually, are available on the Group's website at thewosgroupplc.com.
The Committee's responsibilities are to:
None of the Committee members have any personal nancial interest (other than as a shareholder) in the decisions made by the Committee, any conict of interest arising from cross-directorships, or day-to-day involvement in running the business.
Internal support is provided by the Company Secretary and General Counsel and the Executive Director HR, whose attendance at Committee meetings is by invitation from the Remuneration Committee Chair, to advise on specic questions raised by the Remuneration Committee and on matters relating to the performance and remuneration of the Senior Management team. No Director was present for any discussions that related directly to their own remuneration.
The Committee appointed Deloitte LLP as independent adviser to the Committee following an independent selection process. Fees paid to Deloitte LLP in relation to remuneration services provided to the Committee for FY25 were £59,950, which were charged on a time and materials basis. Deloitte LLP is a member of the Remuneration Consultants' Group, and as such chooses to operate pursuant to a code of conduct that requires remuneration advice to be given objectively and independently. Deloitte did not provide any other services to the Group during the year under review, and there are no connections between Deloitte LLP and individual Directors to be disclosed. The Committee is satised that the advice provided by Deloitte LLP in relation to remuneration matters is objective and independent.
TEA COLAIANNI CHAIR OF THE REMUNERATION COMMITTEE 2 July 2025
This section contains Watches of Switzerland Group PLC's proposed Directors' Remuneration Policy (the 'Remuneration Policy') that will govern and guide the Company's future remuneration payments to Directors. The Remuneration Policy described in this section will be subject to approval by shareholders at the Company's AGM on 3 September 2025, and will apply from this date. The Remuneration Policy may be in force for three years until the AGM in 2028 ('Policy Period'). However, the Committee intends to keep the operation of the Remuneration Policy under review during this time and the Policy may be returned to shareholders in advance of the AGM in 2028, if appropriate.
The Remuneration Committee has established the Remuneration Policy for the remuneration of the Chair and Executive Directors, and the Board (without the Non-Executive Directors present) has established the Remuneration Policy for the remuneration of the Non-Executive Directors.
In order to determine the Remuneration Policy, the Remuneration Committee:
During its deliberations on the Remuneration Policy, the Remuneration Committee was mindful of the potential for conicts of interest and sought to minimise these through an open and transparent process, both internally and externally, by seeking independent advice and through communication with shareholders on the Remuneration Policy.
The Company's Remuneration Policy is designed to provide a framework to:
In determining the Remuneration Policy the Remuneration Committee considered Provision 40 of the UK Corporate Governance Code 2018 (the 'Code'). The following table summarises the Committee's views of how the Remuneration Policy continues to align with these principles:
– The incentive plans are in line with standard UK market practice and therefore should be familiar to all stakeholders
These features outlined above mitigate against the inherent risk of incentives creating the wrong behaviours by:
– The Remuneration Policy clearly sets out the potential rewards available to the Executive Directors depending on the performance achieved
– A key tenet of the Group culture is a focus on ensuring long-term sustainable performance. This is reected in the type of performance conditions used in the incentive plans
– The focus on share ownership as a support to delivering long-term sustainable performance is also a key part of the Company's culture
The Remuneration Policy aims to align the interests of the Executive Directors, Senior Management and employees to the long-term interests of shareholders and aims to support a high performance, collegiate and inclusive culture with appropriate reward for superior Group, business unit and individual performance without creating incentives that will encourage excessive risk taking or unsustainable Company performance. Overall remuneration levels have been set at a level that are considered by the Remuneration Committee to be appropriate for the size and nature of the business, having taken specialist, independent advice where necessary. There has been no increase to any element of the CEO's remuneration package since our admission to the London Stock Exchange in June 2019 despite the increase in the size, complexity and geographical spread of the business since this time.
The Remuneration Committee considers that it is appropriate to have a dened policy position for new members of the Board to take into account that the Company continues to mature and the size and complexity of its global operations continue to increase. The CEO has been with the business since 2014 and has elected not to take an annual pay rise at any time during his tenure. He retains a substantial equity holding in the business and his remuneration, in particular the level of his base salary, is at the lower end of market compared to other companies of a similar size and complexity.
In the event that we were to appoint a new Executive Director, the desired policy position for remuneration (compared to the FTSE 250, excluding nancial services) is as follows:
The Remuneration Committee feels that this approach is aligned with the performance-based culture of the Group with market level of rewards only being earned if performance is delivered with the opportunity to earn more than median for exceptional performance, while ensuring that the overall remuneration arrangements are sufciently complex to enable us to recruit talent at the right level to run the business.
Following the Remuneration Committee's detailed review of the current Remuneration Policy, the Remuneration Committee concluded that the current Remuneration Policy remains broadly t-for-purpose and continues to support the execution of our long-term strategy. As such, no major changes are proposed at this time.
The Committee has determined that where Executive Directors have met their shareholding requirement in full, awards made under the Annual Bonus Plan will typically be made in cash rather than a portion being deferred into shares. The Committee's view is that both of these features ensure strong alignment to shareholders, and it is not necessary to have further deferral of annual bonus awards where Executives already meet the Company's shareholding guidelines.
Other minor changes have been made to the wording of the Remuneration Policy to aid operation, increase exibility in certain areas in-line with standard market practice and to increase clarity.
The Committee will keep the operation of the Policy under review during the Policy Period to ensure that it remains appropriate, and it enables us to recruit and retain the talent that we need to run the business successfully.
The following table sets out the key components of Executive Director remuneration:
Provides a base level of remuneration to support recruitment and retention of Executive Directors with the necessary experience and expertise to deliver the Group's strategy.
An Executive Director's basic salary is set on appointment and normally reviewed annually or when there is a change in position or responsibility. When determining an appropriate level of salary or salary increases, the Remuneration Committee considers factors such as:
As set out above our desired xed pay positioning for Executive Directors is around market median.
Whilst there is no maximum salary, increases will normally be in line with the typical increases awarded to other colleagues in the Group.
However, the Remuneration Committee may determine larger increases in circumstances such as, but not limited to, if there is a material change in the size and responsibilities of the role (including as a result of a signicant change in Group size and/or complexity of operations), where there has been a signicant change in the market, where the overall remuneration opportunity has been set lower than the market and where larger increases are justied based on skills/performance in role or in any other circumstances which the Committee considers to be exceptional.
Performance conditions and recovery provisions
A broad assessment of individual and business performance is used as part of the salary review.
No recovery provisions apply.
Provides an appropriate level of benets taking into account the responsibilities of the role, market practice and our overall remuneration philosophy.
The Group may provide a pension contribution or allowance (or a combination of the two) in line with corporate governance best practice aligned with the rate of pension contribution available to the majority of the wider workforce. This contribution or allowance will be a non-consolidated allowance and will not impact any incentive calculations.
The maximum value of the pension contribution allowance is in line with the rate of pension contribution available to the majority of the wider workforce (currently this is 3.0% of salary).
Performance conditions and recovery provisions No performance or recovery provisions applicable.
Provides an appropriate level of benets taking into account the responsibilities of the role, market practice and our overall remuneration philosophy.
Benets may include (but are not limited to) provision of a car and coverage of its cost (including business fuel costs), car allowance, membership of any private health insurance or medical scheme operated by the Group (including eligibility for spouse/ civil partner and dependent children), death in service life assurance, subsistence expenses, mobile telephone expenses, a retirement gift and staff discounts.
Executive Directors may participate in any all-employee plans on the same basis as other colleagues up to the same limits as for other employees.
The Committee may introduce other benets if it is considered appropriate to do so.
Executive Directors shall be reimbursed for all reasonable expenses and the Company may settle any tax incurred.
Where an Executive Director is required to relocate to perform their role, appropriate one-off or ongoing benets may be provided (e.g. housing, schooling etc.)
The maximum value is the cost of providing the relevant benets.
Performance conditions and recovery provisions No performance or recovery provisions applicable.
The Annual Bonus Plan provides an incentive to the Executive Directors linked to achievement in delivering goals that are closely aligned with the Company's strategy and the creation of value for shareholders.
The performance period is normally one nancial year with pay-out determined by the Remuneration Committee following the year-end, normally based on the achievement against a performance target or targets.
Where an Executive Director has not met their shareholding guideline (as determined by the Committee), two-thirds of the bonus award will normally be paid out in cash with the further one-third normally deferred into shares subject to a three-year vesting period. Deferred shares will be in the form of conditional awards or nil-cost options. There are no further performance targets on the deferred amount.
Where an Executive Director has met their shareholding guideline (as determined by the Committee), the annual bonus will normally be paid out in cash.
Participants may be entitled to dividends or dividend equivalents (where applicable) on deferred share awards to the extent they vest representing the dividends paid during the deferral period (as determined by the Committee).
The maximum annual award in the Annual Bonus Plan in respect of a nancial year is 150% of salary.
Up to 20% of the bonus will be paid for delivering a threshold level of performance and up to 50% of the bonus will be paid for delivering a target level of performance and 100% for maximum performance. The Committee retains discretion to vary these percentage if considered appropriate in the circumstances.
The specic performance measures, underpins, targets and weightings may vary from year-to-year in order to align with the Group's strategy over each year. The measures may include nancial and non-nancial measures. However, at least 50% of the awards will be linked to nancial measures.
Discretion may be exercised in cases where the Remuneration Committee believes that the bonus does not reect the underlying nancial or non-nancial performance of the participant or the Group over the relevant period, or that such payout level is not appropriate in the context of circumstances that were unexpected or unforeseen when the targets were set. When making this judgement the Committee may take into account such factors as the Committee considers relevant. The exercise of this discretion may result in a downward or upward movement in the amount of bonus earned resulting from the application of the performance measures and underpins.
The actual performance targets set will not normally be disclosed at the start of the nancial year, as they are considered to be commercially sensitive. These will be reported and disclosed retrospectively at the end of the year in order for shareholders to assess the basis for any bonus outcomes.
The Annual Bonus Plan contains malus and clawback provisions (further details are provided on page 206).
Awards are designed to incentivise the Executive Directors over the longer-term to successfully implement the Group's strategy and to support retention.
Under the LTIP, the Remuneration Committee may award annual grants of performance share awards in the form of conditional awards or nil-cost options.
LTIP awards will normally vest three years from the date of grant subject to the achievement of the performance measures.
A two-year holding period will normally apply following the three-year vesting period for LTIP awards granted to the Executive Directors. Upon vesting, sufcient shares can be sold to pay tax.
Participants may be entitled to dividends or dividend equivalents (where applicable) on the LTIP shares representing the dividends paid during the vesting and holding period (as determined by the Committee).
The maximum award that may be granted under the LTIP in respect of a nancial year is 200% of salary. The maximum LTIP award in exceptional circumstances is 250% of salary.
20% of the award will normally vest for threshold performance and 100% of the award will vest for maximum performance. The Remuneration Committee retains discretion to vary these percentages if considered appropriate in the circumstances.
Awards vest based on performance against targets, normally measured over a three-year performance period. The Remuneration Committee will review and set weightings and targets for each grant to ensure they remain appropriate. The Remuneration Committee may change the balance of the measures, or use different measures for subsequent awards, as appropriate.
Discretion may also be exercised in cases where the Remuneration Committee believes that the vesting outcome does not reect the underlying nancial or non-nancial performance of the participant or the Group over the relevant period, or that such payout level is not appropriate in the context of circumstances that were unexpected or unforeseen when the targets were set. When making this judgement the Remuneration Committee may take into account such factors as the Remuneration Committee considers relevant. The exercise of this discretion may result in a downward or upward movement in the amount of the LTIP vesting resulting from the application of the performance measures.
Details of the performance conditions for awards made in the year will normally be set out in the Annual Report on Remuneration and for future grants in the section headed Implementation of Remuneration Policy.
The LTIP contains clawback and malus provisions.
The performance measures selected for the annual bonus and LTIP awards are set on an annual basis by the Committee, to ensure that they remain appropriate to reect the priorities for the Company in the year ahead. For FY26, the annual bonus is based on Adjusted EBIT1, subject to an ESG underpin to reect our commitment to delivering our strategy in this area. The performance measures for the FY26 LTIP award will be based on Adjusted Earnings Per Share (EPS)1 and Return on Capital Employed (ROCE)1, which are selected by the Remuneration Committee to reect the successful delivery of revenue, sales growth, capital efciency and prot. The targets for the performance measures are set taking into account a number of factors, including the Company's annual operating plan, strategic priorities, the economic environment and market conditions and expectations.
The Remuneration Committee has discretion in several areas of the Remuneration Policy as set out in this document. The Remuneration Committee may also exercise operational and administrative discretions under relevant plan rules as set out in those rules (see 'Operation of incentive plans' below). In addition, the Remuneration Committee has the discretion to amend the Remuneration Policy with regard to minor or administrative matters where it would be, in the opinion of the Remuneration Committee, disproportionate to seek or await shareholder approval.
The Remuneration Committee will operate all incentive plans according to the rules of each respective plan and the discretions contained therein. The discretions cover aspects such as the timing of grant and vesting of awards, determining the size of the award (subject to the Remuneration Policy limits), the treatment of leavers, retrospective adjustment of awards (e.g. for a rights issue, a corporate restructuring or for special dividends) and, in exceptional circumstances, the discretion to adjust previously set targets for an incentive award if events happen which cause the Remuneration Committee to determine that it would be appropriate to do so. In exercising such discretions, the Remuneration Committee will take into account generally accepted market practice, best practice guidelines, the provisions of the UK Listing Rules and the Company's approved Remuneration Policy.
In exceptional circumstances the Remuneration Committee retains the discretion to change the performance measures and targets and the weighting attached to the performance measures and targets part-way through a performance period if there is a signicant and material event which causes the Remuneration Committee to believe the original measures, weightings and targets are no longer appropriate.
1 This is an Alternative Performance Measure. Refer to Glossary on pages 270 to 273 for denitions and reconciliation to statutory measures.
The Remuneration Committee reserves the right to make any remuneration payments and/or payments for loss of ofce (including exercising any discretions available to it in connection with such payments) notwithstanding that they are not in line with the Remuneration Policy, where the terms of the payment were agreed (i) before the Remuneration Policy set out came into effect, provided that the terms of the payment were consistent with any shareholder-approved Directors' Remuneration Policy in force at the time they were agreed; or (ii) at a time when the relevant individual was not a Director of the Company (or other persons to whom the Remuneration Policy set out above applies) and, in the opinion of the Remuneration Committee, the payment was not in consideration for the individual becoming a Director of the Company or such other person. For these purposes, 'payments' includes the Remuneration Committee satisfying awards of variable remuneration and, in relation to an award over shares, the terms of the payment are 'agreed' no later than at the time the award is granted.
This Policy applies equally to any individual who is required to be treated as a Director under the applicable regulations.
The Remuneration Committee has adopted shareholding guidelines that will encourage the Executive Directors to build up their shareholding over a ve-year period, from date of appointment, and then subsequently hold a shareholding equivalent to a percentage of salary. This policy ensures that the interests of Executive Directors and those of shareholders are closely aligned. The minimum expected shareholding guideline for Executive Directors is 200% of salary. The Remuneration Committee retains the discretion to increase the shareholding requirements.
In addition, a post-cessation minimum shareholding guideline will apply to Executive Directors who step down from the Board. Leavers will have a requirement to hold 100% of their pre-cessation shareholding guideline for 24 months from the date they step down from the Board. In the event that a leaver has not met the relevant shareholding requirement at the point of stepping down from the Board then they would be required to retain their full pre-cessation shareholding for the 24-month period. The Committee retains discretion to waive this guideline if is not considered to be appropriate in the specic circumstance.
The Group's approach is that the remuneration of any new recruit will be assessed in line with the same principles as for the current Executive Directors. The Remuneration Committee is mindful that it wishes to avoid paying more than it considers necessary to secure a preferred candidate with the appropriate calibre and experience needed for the role. In setting the remuneration for new recruits, the Remuneration Committee will have regard to our desired Remuneration Policy position outlined above as well as to guidelines and shareholder sentiment.
The Group's detailed policy when setting remuneration for the appointment of new Executive Directors is summarised below:
These will normally be set in line with the Remuneration Policy table.
The Executive Director may be eligible to participate in the Annual Bonus Plan as set out in the Remuneration Policy table.
The Executive Director may be eligible to participate in the LTIP as set out in the Remuneration Policy table.
The maximum level of variable remuneration which may be offered in the year of recruitment is 400% of salary.
The Remuneration Committee does not provide replacement awards as a matter of course. However, should the Remuneration Committee determine that the individual circumstances of recruitment justied the provision of compensatory payments or awards then, where an individual forfeits outstanding variable pay opportunities or contractual rights at a previous employer as a result of appointment, the Remuneration Committee may offer compensatory payments or awards, in such form as the Remuneration Committee considers appropriate, taking into account all relevant factors including the form of awards, expected value and vesting timeframe of forfeited opportunities.
When determining any such 'buyout', the guiding principle would be that awards would generally be on a 'like for like' basis unless this is considered by the Remuneration Committee not to be practical or appropriate.
In instances where a new Executive Director is required to relocate or spend signicant time away from their normal residence, the Company may provide assistance with relocation (either via one-off or ongoing payments or benets). The level of the relocation package will be assessed on a case-by-case basis but will take into consideration any cost-of-living differences/housing allowance and schooling.
Where an existing colleague is promoted to the Board, the Remuneration Policy would apply from the date of their appointment to the Board as an Executive Director and there would be no retrospective application of the Remuneration Policy in relation to subsisting incentive awards or remuneration arrangements. Accordingly, prevailing elements of the remuneration package for an existing employee would be honoured and form part of the ongoing remuneration of the person concerned. Where required, these would be disclosed to shareholders in the Remuneration Report for the relevant nancial year.
When setting fees for the appointment of new Non-Executive Directors the same arrangement applies as to the current Non-Executive Directors.
The Remuneration Committee's policy for setting notice periods is that a six-month period will normally apply for Executive Directors unless the Remuneration Committee determines that a longer period of up to 12 months would be more appropriate in the circumstances. The Remuneration Committee may in exceptional circumstances, arising on recruitment, allow a longer period, which would in any event reduce to either six or 12 months following the rst year of employment. The Non-Executive Directors of the Company do not have service contracts.
The Non-Executive Directors are appointed by letters of appointment. Each Non-Executive Director's term of ofce runs for a three-year period.
The Company follows the Code's recommendation that all directors of FTSE 350 companies be subject to annual reappointment by shareholders.
The table below summarises the service contracts for Executive Directors.
| Director | Date of contract Notice period | |
|---|---|---|
| Brian Duffy (CEO) | 7 May 2019 | 6 months |
| Anders Romberg (CFO) | 12 May 2023 | 6 months |
The Non-Executive Directors do not have service contracts but do have letters of appointment which reect their responsibilities and commitments.
| Name | Date of letter of appointment |
Date of letter of appointment renewal |
Notice period |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ian Carter (Chair) 1 November 2020 | 1 November 2023 | 3 months | |
| Tea Colaianni | 7 May 2019 | 7 May 2025 | 3 months |
| Robert Moorhead 7 May 2019 | 7 May 2025 | 3 months | |
| Rosa Monckton | 7 May 2019 | 7 May 2025 | 3 months |
| Chabi Nouri | 3 May 2022 | 3 May 2025 | 3 months |
Contracts and letters of appointments will be available for inspection at the Company's ofce.
When determining any loss of ofce payment for a departing Executive Director, the Remuneration Committee will always seek to minimise the cost to the Group while complying with contractual terms and seeking to reect the circumstances in place at the time.
The Remuneration Committee will honour Executive Directors' contractual entitlements. Service contracts do not contain liquidated damages clauses. If a contract is to be terminated, the Remuneration Committee will determine such mitigation as it considers fair and reasonable in each case. There are no contractual arrangements that would guarantee a pension with limited or no abatement on severance or early retirement. There is no agreement between the Company and its Directors or colleagues providing for compensation for loss of ofce or employment that occurs because of a takeover bid.
The Remuneration Committee reserves the right to make additional payments where such payments are made in good faith in discharge of an existing legal obligation (or by way of damages for breach of such an obligation); or by way of settlement or compromise of any claim arising regarding the termination of an Executive Director's ofce or employment.
The Remuneration Committee may agree that the Group will pay for the provision of outplacement support and the reasonable fees for a departing Director to obtain independent legal advice in relation to their termination arrangements and reasonable consideration for any agreement to introduce contractual terms protecting the Company's rights following termination.
These will be paid over the notice period. The Company has discretion to make a lump sum payment in lieu of any remaining notice.
Performance conditions will normally be measured at the bonus measurement date. Bonus will normally be pro-rated for the period worked during the nancial year.
No bonus will be payable for year of cessation.
The Remuneration Committee has the following elements of discretion:
All subsisting deferred share awards will vest.
Lapse of any unvested deferred share awards.
The Remuneration Committee has the following elements of discretion:
Pro-rated for time and performance in respect of each subsisting LTIP award.
Lapse of any unvested LTIP awards.
The following treatment will apply on a change of control of the Company as dened in the relevant plan rules.
Pro-rated for time and performance to the date of the change of control.
The Remuneration Committee has discretion regarding whether to pro-rate the bonus for time or not. The Remuneration Committee retains the discretion to determine the extent to which the performance targets have been met.
Element: Annual bonus – deferred share awards
Subsisting deferred share awards will vest on a change of control.
The number of shares subject to subsisting LTIP awards will vest on a change of control, pro-rated to time and performance.
The Remuneration Committee has discretion regarding whether to pro-rate the LTIP awards for time or not. The Remuneration Committee retains the discretion to determine the extent to which the performance targets have been met.
Cessation of employment in circumstances other than those set out above is cessation for other reasons.
Malus will apply up to the date of the bonus payment and clawback will apply for a period of two years following the bonus payment.
Element: Annual bonus – deferred share awards
Malus will apply during any share deferral period.
Malus will apply during the vesting period and clawback will apply for a period of two years post-vesting.
The Remuneration Committee determined the most appropriate timeframe for provisions to apply in consideration of a number of factors including the timing of the underlying award as well as the nature of our business. The circumstances in which malus and clawback could apply are as follows:
The charts below seek to demonstrate how pay varies with performance for the Executive Directors based on the stated Remuneration Policy. The charts show an estimate of the remuneration that could be received by Executive Directors under the Remuneration Policy set out in this document. Each of the bars is broken down to show how the total under each scenario is made up of xed elements of remuneration, the annual bonus and the LTIP. The charts indicate that a signicant proportion of both target and maximum pay is performance related.

| Element: Annual bonus |
|---|
| Minimum None |
| On-target 50% of maximum award |
| Maximum 100% of maximum award |
| Element: LTIP |
| Minimum None |
| On-target 60% of maximum award |
| Maximum 100% of maximum award |
Executive Directors are permitted to accept external, non-executive appointments with the prior approval of the Board where such appointments are not considered to have an adverse impact on their role within the Group. The Executive Directors may retain fees paid for these services, which will be subject to approval by the Board. Neither Brian Duffy nor Anders Romberg currently have any external appointments.


Non-Executive Directors are paid fees at a level sufcient to attract individuals of the calibre and qualications required to manage the business of the Group effectively. Fees are set at levels appropriate to the size and complexity of the organisation, the time commitment required, and the qualications and experience of the individual appointed.
Core element of remuneration set at a level sufcient to attract and retain individuals with appropriate knowledge and experience in organisations of broadly similar size and complexity.
The Board is responsible for setting the remuneration of the Non-Executive Directors.
The Remuneration Committee is responsible for setting the Chair of the Board's fees.
Non-Executive Directors are paid an annual fee and additional fees for chairship of committees, the role of Senior Independent Director (SID) and membership of committees.
The Chair of the Board receives a fee but does not receive any additional fees for membership of committees.
Fees are reviewed annually with reference to the market as well as to the time commitment of the role and the evolving size and complexity of the business. Changes to fees are normally effective from the beginning of the relevant nancial year.
Non-Executive Directors and the Chair of the Board do not participate in any variable remuneration or benets arrangements with the exception of the staff discount offered to colleagues.
Additional fees may be paid to reect additional Board or Committee responsibilities or time commitment (such as travel) as appropriate.
Reasonable costs in relation to travel and accommodation for business purposes are reimbursed to the Chair of the Board and Non-Executive Directors.
The Company may meet any tax liabilities that may arise on such expenses.
Additional benets may be introduced if considered appropriate.
There is no maximum fee or fee increase for the Non-Executive Directors and the Chair of the Board.
In general the level of fee increase for the Non-Executive Directors and the Chair of the Board will be set taking account of any change in responsibility and will take into account the general rise in salaries across the UK workforce. However, the Board/Remuneration Committee may determine larger increases in circumstances such as but not limited to if there is a material change in the size and responsibilities of the role or the time commitment of the role (including as a result of a signicant change in Group size and/or complexity of operations) or where there has been a change in market practice.
The Group will pay reasonable expenses incurred by the Non-Executive Directors and settle any tax incurred in relation to these.
When setting the Remuneration Policy for Executive Directors, the Remuneration Committee takes into account the pay and employment conditions elsewhere within the Group. The Remuneration Committee considers factors such as Group colleagues' base salary increases (the base salary increases for Executive Directors takes into consideration base salary increases for colleagues and relevant market conditions), Group colleagues' pension plans design and contribution levels (the pension contribution for Executive Directors will not exceed the maximum contribution that can be made to the majority of the wider workforce), and the Group's remuneration principles which apply to all colleagues in the Group.
Remuneration arrangements and practices throughout the Group are determined taking into account the Group's purpose and values, to support delivery of our strategy and promote long-term sustainable success. The Group also seeks to remunerate in line with market salaries and benets. Bonus arrangements are cascaded down the organisation to incentivise the achievement of Group and personal objectives. Participation in the LTIP is extended to members of the Senior Executive Team and others on a discretionary basis. The Remuneration Committee believes the Group's approach to cascading its variable incentive arrangements down the organisation is fair.
Given the geographical spread of the Group's operations, the Remuneration Committee does not consider it appropriate to consult colleagues on the Remuneration Policy in operation for Executive Directors. Although we do not specically consult colleagues on executive remuneration, we have in place a variety of colleague engagement channels which provide colleagues with an opportunity to provide feedback on any topics that interest or concern them.
The Remuneration Committee carefully considered the views of our shareholders and shareholder bodies when developing the Remuneration Policy. The Company welcomes continued dialogue with its shareholders and the Remuneration Committee will consult with key shareholders prior to any signicant changes to its Remuneration Policy in future.
| Element | Implementation for FY26 |
|---|---|
| Salary | The Executive Directors elected not to receive a salary increase with the salary budget focused on providing increases to lower paid workers. |
| Base salary levels for FY26 therefore remain at: – CEO: £500,000 – CFO: £380,000 |
|
| – Salary reviews for all colleagues take place in November | |
| Pension | The CEO and CFO have chosen to waive their employer pension contributions. |
| Bene¡ts | Market standard benets. |
| The CFO has chosen to waive his car allowance. |
| Element | Implementation for FY26 | Implementation for FY26 for Non-Executive Directors | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Annual bonus | No changes to opportunity levels: | Element | Implementation for FY26 |
| – CEO: 150% of salary | Chair and Non-Executive Director fees |
Fees remain as follows: | |
| – CFO: 125% of salary | – Chair £190,000 (no change) | ||
| For FY26, the annual bonus will continue to be based on Adjusted EBIT and the ESG underpin will continue to apply. |
– NED base fee £50,000 (no change) | ||
| – Senior Independent Director fee £10,000 (no change) | |||
| The ESG underpin will inform the Committee's decision of whether or not to apply a downwards adjustment of up to 10% to the formulaic FY26 annual bonus outcome in order to take into account the wider ESG performance of the Group. |
– Committee Chair fee £10,000 (no change) | ||
| – Audit & Risk Committee, Remuneration Committee, ESG Committee membership fee £5,000 (no change) |
|||
| – Nomination Committee membership fee £2,500 (no change) |
|||
| Two-thirds will be paid out in cash and one-third deferred into shares for any Executive Director whose shareholding guidelines have not been met. Where an Executive Director has met their shareholding guideline, the annual bonus will be |
No increase to Non-Executive Director or Chair fees has been determined at this time but fees will continue to be kept under review. |
||
| paid fully in cash. | |||
| LTIP | No changes proposed to opportunity levels: | ||
| – CEO: 200% of salary | |||
| – CFO: 175% of salary | |||
| LTIP awards will continue to be based 80% on a three-year cumulative Adjusted EPS and 20% on three-year average ROCE. |
|||
| LTIP awards will be granted later in the year. The payouts under the LTIP for levels of performance are as follows: |
|||
| – Threshold: 20% of max | |||
| – Target: 60% of max | |||
| – Max: 100% of max | |||
| With straight-line vesting between these points. Due to the ongoing market volatility, the Committee has not yet nalised the LTIP targets for FY26 awards. These targets will be set prior to grant, and will be disclosed, at the latest, in the RNS at the time of the award. |
|||
| Shareholding guidelines |
The minimum shareholding requirement for Executive Directors is 200% of salary, which can be built up within ve years of appointment. |
Registered oce address: Aurum House, 2 Elland Road, Braunstone, Leicester, LE3 1TT
Country of incorporation: England and Wales
Type: Public Limited Company
Principal activities: The principal activity of the Group is the retailing of luxury watches and jewellery.
The Directors present their report, together with the audited Consolidated Financial Statements of the Group and of the Company, for the nancial year ended 27 April 2025. The Company has chosen in accordance with Section 414C (11) of the Companies Act 2006 to provide disclosures and information in relation to a number of matters which are covered elsewhere in this Annual Report and Accounts. These matters, together with those required under the 2013 Large and Medium-sized Companies and Groups (Accounts and Reports) Regulations 2008, are crossreferenced in the accompanying tables and together form the Directors' Report.
| Topic | Section of the report | Page |
|---|---|---|
| Important events impacting the business | Strategic Report | 8 to 13 |
| Financial instruments | Note 23 of the Consolidated Financial Statements |
258 |
| Colleague disabilities | Environment, Social and Governance 211 | |
| Modern Slavery Statement | Environment, Social and Governance 137 | |
| Greenhouse gas emissions, energy consumption and energy-efcient action |
Environment, Social and Governance 130 | |
| Carbon reporting | Environment, Social and Governance 130 | |
| Risk Management | Risk Management | 144 to 147 |
| S172(1) Companies Act 2006 | Strategic Report | 66 |
| Topic | Section of the report | Page |
|---|---|---|
| Diversity and Ethnicity | Corporate Governance Report Nomination Committee Report |
173 and 177 |
| Topic | Section of the report | Page |
|---|---|---|
| Directors' interests in shares | Remuneration Committee Report | 196 |
| Directors' long-term incentive share awards Remuneration Committee Report | 196 | |
| Going concern | Going Concern and Viability Statement |
154 155 |
| Topic | Section of the report | Page |
|---|---|---|
| Corporate Governance Statement 2025 | Corporate Governance Report | 164 |
| Topic | Section of the report | Page |
|---|---|---|
| Likely future developments | Strategic Report | 8 to 13 |
| Research and Development | Strategic Report | 108 |
| Branches – A list of our subsidiaries, associates and joint ventures |
Financial Statements | 267 |
The Group has chosen to provide information in relation to the Statement of Engagement with colleagues elsewhere in this report. This is cross referenced in the table below:
| Information | Section of the report | Page |
|---|---|---|
| How the Directors engage with colleagues |
Section 172(1) Statement Board activity |
67 |
| How the Group provides colleagues with information on matters of concern to them as colleagues |
Environment, Social and Governance 143 | |
| How the Group consults with and considers colleague feedback |
Environment, Social and Governance 80 to 82 | |
| Non-Financial Information and Sustainability Information Statement |
Non-Financial and Sustainability Information Statement |
65 |
| Information | Section of the report | Page |
|---|---|---|
| Foster the Company's business relationships |
Section 172(1) Statement | 66 |
| Principal decisions affecting suppliers, clients and others taken by the Company during the nancial year |
Section 172(1) Statement Board activity |
66 to 69 |
The Strategic Report and the Directors' Report (or parts thereof), together with sections of this Annual Report and Accounts incorporated by reference, are the Management Report for the purposes of DTR 4.1.8.
In accordance with the Companies Act 2006, the Articles of Association (the 'Articles') may only be amended by a special resolution of the Company's shareholders at a general meeting.
The 2025 AGM of the Company will be held at 2.30pm on 3 September 2025, at our ofces at 36 North Row, London W1K 6DH. The Notice of AGM is given, together with explanatory notes, in the booklet which accompanies this Annual Report and Accounts.
| Ian Carter | |
|---|---|
| Brian Duffy | |
| Anders Romberg | |
| Tea Colaianni | |
| Robert Moorhead | |
| Baroness (Rosa) Monckton MBE | |
| Chabi Nouri |
All Directors have served throughout the year. Full biographies of the current Directors can be found on pages 162 and 163.
STRATEGIC REPORT | GOVERNANCE REPORT | FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
The appointment, reappointment and replacement of Directors is governed by the Articles, the UK Corporate Governance Code 2018 (the 'Code'), the Companies Act 2006 and related legislation. The Code recommends that all directors of publicly listed companies stand for election every year. At the 2024 AGM, all members of the Board stood for election or re-election and were duly elected. At the 2025 AGM all Directors will be offering themselves for re-election. The Board is satised that each Non-Executive Director, offering themselves for re-election, is independent in both character and judgement, and that their experience, knowledge and other business interests enable them to contribute signicantly to the work and balance of the Board.
A Director may be appointed to the Board by:
In addition, the Directors may appoint a Director to ll a vacancy or as an additional Director, provided that the individual retires at the next AGM; if they are to continue, they must offer themselves for election. A Director must vacate ofce in certain circumstances as set out in the Company's Articles and may be removed by ordinary resolution provided special notice of that resolution has been given.
Subject to the Articles, the Companies Act 2006 and any directions given by the Company by special resolution and any relevant statutes and regulations, the business of the Company will be managed by the Board which may exercise all the powers of the Company. Specic powers relating to the allotment and issuance of ordinary shares and the ability of the Company to purchase its own securities are also included within the Articles, and such authorities may be submitted for approval by the shareholders at the AGM each year.
The Directors' interests in, and options over, ordinary shares in the Company are shown in the Directors' Remuneration Report on Remuneration on page 196. In line with the requirements of the Companies Act 2006,
Directors have a statutory duty to avoid situations in which they have, or may have, interests that conict with those of the Company unless that conict is rst authorised by the Board. The Company has procedures in place for managing conicts of interest. The Company's Articles contain provisions to allow the Directors to authorise potential conicts of interest, so that if approved, a Director will not be in breach of his/her duty under company law. In line with the requirements of the Companies Act 2006, each Director has notied the Company of any situation in which they have, or could have, a direct or indirect interest that conicts, or possibly may conict, with the interests of the Company (a situational conict). Directors have a continuing duty to update any changes to their conicts of interest and a note is then made of that update.
During the year, the conict of interests' procedures operated effectively.
Directors' and Ofcers' insurance has been established for all Directors and Ofcers to provide cover against their reasonable actions on behalf of the Company. The Company also indemnies the Directors under a qualifying indemnity for the purposes of Section 236 of the Companies Act 2006. This indemnity contains provisions that are permitted by the director liability provisions of the Companies Act 2006 and the Company's Articles.
The Group has policies on equal opportunities and the employment of persons with disabilities which, through the application of fair employment practices, are intended to ensure that individuals are treated equitably and consistently regardless of age, race, creed, colour, gender, marital or parental status, sexual orientation, religious beliefs and nationality. Applications for employment by persons with disabilities are always fully considered, bearing in mind the respective aptitudes and abilities of the applicant concerned. In the event of colleagues becoming disabled, every effort is made to ensure their employment with the Group is continued and that the appropriate training is arranged. It is the policy of the Group that the training, career development and promotion of a persons with disabilities should, as far as possible, be identical to that of a person who does not have a disability.
The Directors are responsible for preparing the Annual Report and Accounts in accordance with applicable law and regulations.
Company law requires the Directors to prepare Financial Statements for each nancial year that give a true and fair view of the state of affairs of the Group and the Company as at the end of the nancial year, and of the prot or loss of the Group for the nancial year. Under that law the Directors have prepared the Group Financial Statements in accordance with UK adopted international accounting standards and have elected to prepare the Company's Financial Statements in accordance with United Kingdom Generally Accepted Accounting Practice, including FRS 102 (The Financial Reporting Standard applicable in the United Kingdom and the Republic of Ireland) and the Companies Act 2006.
Under company law, the Directors must not approve the Financial Statements unless they are satised that they give a true and fair view of the state of affairs of the Group and the Company and of the prot or loss of the Group for that period.
In preparing the Annual Report and Accounts, the Directors are required to:
The Directors are responsible for keeping adequate accounting records that are sufcient to show and explain the Group's and the Company's transactions and disclose with reasonable accuracy at any time the nancial position of the Company and the Group and enable them to ensure that the Financial Statements comply with the Companies Act 2006. They are also responsible for safeguarding the assets of the Company and the Group and hence for taking reasonable steps for the prevention and detection of fraud and other irregularities.
Under applicable law and regulations, the Directors are also responsible for preparing a Strategic Report, Directors' Report, Directors' Remuneration Report and Corporate Governance Statement that comply with that law and those regulations. The Directors are responsible for the maintenance and integrity of the corporate and nancial information included on the Company's website.
Each of the Directors, whose names and functions are listed on pages 162 and 163 conrms that, to the best of their knowledge:
Laura Battley is the Company Secretary of the Watches of Switzerland Group PLC and its trading UK Group subsidiaries who can be contacted via the Company's Registered Ofce.
Having been appointed as the External Auditor in 2019, Ernst & Young LLP has expressed its willingness to continue in its capacity as independent External Auditor of the Company. The Directors are recommending a resolution in favour of this reappointment and a resolution for authorisation of Auditor remuneration at the forthcoming AGM.
In accordance with Section 418(2) of the Companies Act 2006, each Director in ofce at the date the Directors' Report is approved, conrms that:
The Directors do not recommend the payment of a dividend.
The Group made no political donations and incurred no political expenditure during the year.
| Number of shares |
Nominal value | |
|---|---|---|
| Allotted, called up and fully paid ordinary shares of £0.0125 each |
236,767,569 | £2,959,595 |
All shareholders are entitled to attend and speak at the general meetings of the Company, appoint proxies, receive any dividends, exercise voting rights and transfer shares without restriction. On a show of hands at a general meeting, every member present in-person shall have one vote, and on a poll, every member present in-person or by proxy shall have one vote for every ordinary share held. There are no known arrangements that may restrict the transfer of shares or voting rights.
Under the Company's Share Incentive Plan, Trustees hold shares on behalf of colleague participants. The Trustees will only vote on those shares, and receive dividends on those shares, should the Company pay dividends in the future, that a participant benecially owns, in accordance with the participant's wishes.
An Employee Benet Trust also operates which has discretion to vote on any shares it holds as it sees t, except any shares participants own benecially, in which case the Trustee will only vote on such shares as per a participant's instructions. The Trustee of the Employee Benet Trust has waived its right to dividends on all shares within the Trust.
The Company is not aware of any other dividend waivers or voting restrictions in place.
The Articles do not contain any restrictions on the transfer of ordinary shares in the Company other than the usual restrictions applicable where any amount is unpaid on a share. However, restrictions are imposed by laws and regulations such as the prohibition on insider trading and the requirements of the Listing Rules whereby PDMR's dealings need to be approved. The Company has adopted a Share Dealing Code to regulate PDMR dealings and has extended the scope of that Code to include certain other colleagues.
Under the Companies Act 2006, the Directors may only allot shares if authorised to do so by the shareholders in a general meeting.
At the Company's 2024 AGM the Company's shareholders passed a shareholder resolution granting the Company authority to purchase its own shares pursuant to Sections 693 and 701 of the Companies Act 2006.
The authority is limited to an aggregate maximum number of 23,957,029 ordinary shares, representing 10% of the Company's issued share capital, excluding treasury shares. The maximum price which may be paid for an ordinary share will be an amount which is not more than the higher of (i) 5% above the average of the middle market quotation for an ordinary share as derived from the London Stock Exchange Plc's Daily Ofcial List for the ve business days immediately preceding the day on which the ordinary share is contracted to be purchased; and (ii) the higher of the price of the last independent trade and the highest current independent bid on the trading venue where the purchase is carried out (in each case, exclusive of expenses).
The authority shall, unless varied, revoked or renewed, expire at the end of the Company's 2025 AGM or, if earlier, at close of business on 3 December 2026, when a resolution to renew the authority to purchase Company shares will be submitted to shareholders.
During the nancial year, 3,302,454 ordinary shares of GBP 0.025 each (representing 1.3% of the ordinary shares in issue at 27 April 2025) were purchased by the Company for a total consideration of £12,115,883, including expenses, and subsequently cancelled.
A further 3,465,947 shares were purchased between 28 April 2025 and the date of this Report and subsequently cancelled.
There are currently no shares held in Treasury.
The purpose of the share buyback programme was to reduce the capital of the Company.
Information regarding the Company's use of nancial instruments, nancial risk management objectives and policies can be found in the Risk Management section of the Strategic Report on pages 144 to 147 and note 23 of the Consolidated Financial Statements.
There are no agreements between the Company and its Directors or colleagues providing for compensation for loss of ofce or employment (whether through resignation, purported redundancy or otherwise) by reason of a takeover bid.
Details concerning the impact on the annual bonus (cash and deferred share awards) and LTIPs held by Directors and Senior Management in the event of a change of control are set out in the Remuneration Policy which was approved by shareholders at the AGM in 2022; a revised Remuneration Policy will be proposed to shareholders for approval at the 2025 AGM. Further details on the 2025 Remuneration Policy can be found on pages 200 to 209.
Various agreements that the Group has entered into with third-parties, including key distribution agreements with luxury watch and jewellery brands, lease agreements, as well as contracts with third-party service providers, provide such parties with a right to terminate the agreement in the event of a change of control.
The £225.0 million multicurrency revolving loan facility entered into on 9 May 2023, includes certain customary mandatory prepayment and cancellation events, including mandatory prepayments on a change of control of either Watches of Switzerland Group PLC or Jewel UK Midco Limited if a lender so requests after a period of negotiations.
Additionally, a £150.0 million multicurrency term and revolving facilities agreement was entered into on 13 December 2024, which includes certain customary mandatory prepayment and cancellation events, including mandatory prepayments on a change of control of either Watches of Switzerland Group PLC or Jewel UK Midco Limited if a lender so requests after a period of negotiations.
The table below, shows the notiable interests in the Company's ordinary issued share capital, as at the date of this report, as notied in accordance with the provisions of DTR 5.1.2R representing 3% or more of the Company's issued ordinary share capital.
These holdings may have changed since the Company was notied. However, notication of any change is not required until the next notiable threshold is crossed.
| Noti—able interest | Voting rights |
% of capital disclosed |
Nature of holding as per disclosure |
|---|---|---|---|
| The Capital Group Companies, Inc. 12,052,654 | 5.03 – Indirect interest 5.03% | ||
| Pelham Capital Ltd.1 | 11,948,369 | 4.99 – Direct interest 4.99% | |
| Norges Bank | 10,284,447 | 4.41 – Indirect interest 4.41% | |
| Brian Duffy | 7,696,999 | 3.21 – Direct interest 3.21% | |
| Alberta Investment Management Corporation |
7,075,000 | 3.00 – Direct interest 3.00% |
1 These holdings reect the latest notication received by the Company. However, the Company is of the view that this holding may no longer be accurate and is seeking conrmation from the relevant investor.
Refer to note 24 on page 261 of the Consolidated Financial Statements for details of related party transactions in the year.
Following the year-end, the £25.0 million share buyback programme was completed with the payment and cancellation of 3,465,947 shares for a cash consideration of £13.7 million. Following the cancellation, there are 233,301,622 ordinary shares in issue.
The Strategic Report on pages 2 to 155, the Directors' Report on pages 201 to 213 and the Corporate Governance Report were approved by the Board on 2 July 2025.
Approved by the Board and signed on its behalf.
LAURA BATTLEY COMPANY SECRETARY 2 July 2025
| 216 | Independent Auditor's Report |
|---|---|
| 222 | Consolidated Income Statement |
| 223 | Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Income |
| 224 | Consolidated Balance Sheet |
| 225 | Consolidated Statement of Changes in Equity |
| 226 | Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows |
| 227 | Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements |
| 264 | Company Balance Sheet |
| 265 | Company Statement of Changes in Equity |
| 266 | Notes to the Company Financial Statements |
| 270 | Glossary |
| 274 | Shareholder Information |
In our opinion:
We have audited the Financial Statements of Watches of Switzerland Group PLC (the 'Parent Company') and its subsidiaries (the 'Group') for the 52-week period ended 27 April 2025 which comprise:
| Group | Parent Company |
|---|---|
| Consolidated Income Statement for the 52-weeks ended 27 April 2025 |
Company Balance Sheet as at 27 April 2025 |
| Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Income for the 52-weeks ended 27 April 2025 |
Company Statement of Changes in Equity as at 27 April 2025 |
| Consolidated Balance Sheet as at 27 April 2025 |
Related notes C1 to C10 to the Financial Statements including a summary of signicant accounting policies |
| Consolidated Statement of Changes in Equity as at 27 April 2025 |
|
| Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows for the 52-weeks ended 27 April 2025 |
|
| Related notes 1 to 27 to the Financial Statements, including material accounting policy information |
The nancial reporting framework that has been applied in the preparation of the Group Financial Statements is applicable law and UK adopted international accounting standards. The nancial reporting framework that has been applied in the preparation of the Parent Company Financial Statements is applicable law and United Kingdom Accounting Standards, including FRS 102 'The Financial Reporting Standard applicable in the UK and Republic of Ireland' (United Kingdom Generally Accepted Accounting Practice).
We conducted our audit in accordance with International Standards on Auditing (UK) (ISAs (UK)) and applicable law. Our responsibilities under those standards are further described in the Auditor's responsibilities for the audit of the Financial Statements section of our report. We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufcient and appropriate to provide a basis for our opinion.
We are independent of the Group and Parent in accordance with the ethical requirements that are relevant to our audit of the Financial Statements in the UK, including the FRC's Ethical Standard as applied to listed public interest entities, and we have fullled our other ethical responsibilities in accordance with these requirements.
The non-audit services prohibited by the FRC's Ethical Standard were not provided to the Group or the Parent Company and we remain independent of the Group and the Parent Company in conducting the audit.
In auditing the Financial Statements, we have concluded that the directors' use of the going concern basis of accounting in the preparation of the Financial Statements is appropriate. Our evaluation of the directors' assessment of the Group and Parent Company's ability to continue to adopt the going concern basis of accounting included:
Our key observations are that the director's assessment forecasts that the Group will maintain sufcient liquidity and comply with all covenants throughout the going concern assessment period in both the base case and plausible downside scenarios. The directors consider that the possibility of the reverse stress scenario occurring to be remote taking into account liquidity and covenant headroom, as well as mitigating actions within the Group's control and the fact that this would represent a signicant reduction in sales and margin from prior nancial years.
Based on the work we have performed, we have not identied any material uncertainties relating to events or conditions that, individually or collectively, may cast signicant doubt on the Group and Parent Company's ability to continue as a going concern for a period to 31 October 2026.
In relation to the Group and Parent Company's reporting on how they have applied the UK Corporate Governance Code, we have nothing material to add or draw attention to in relation to the directors' statement in the Financial Statements about whether the directors considered it appropriate to adopt the going concern basis of accounting.
Our responsibilities and the responsibilities of the directors with respect to going concern are described in the relevant sections of this report. However, because not all future events or conditions can be predicted, this statement is not a guarantee as to the Group's ability to continue as a going concern.
| Audit scope | – We performed an audit of the complete nancial information of three components and audit procedures on specic balances for a further one component. We also performed specied audit procedures on certain accounts on one additional component. Central procedures were performed on cash, loans and borrowings, taxation, exceptional items and equity. |
|---|---|
| Key audit matters | – Showroom asset impairment – Inventory provision valuation – Revenue recognition including the risk of management override |
| Materiality | – Overall Group materiality of £6.7m which represents 5% of prot before tax and exceptional items. |
In the current year our audit scoping has been updated to reect the new requirements of ISA (UK) 600 (Revised). We have followed a risk-based approach when developing our audit approach to obtain sufcient appropriate audit evidence on which to base our audit opinion.
We performed risk assessment procedures, with input from our component auditors, to identify and assess risks of material misstatement of the Group Financial Statements and identied signicant accounts and disclosures. When identifying components at which audit work needed to be performed to respond to the identied risks of material misstatement of the Group Financial Statements, we considered our understanding of the Group and its business environment, the potential impact of climate change, the applicable nancial framework, the Group's system of internal control at the entity level, the existence of centralised processes, applications and any relevant internal audit results.
We determined that centralised audit procedures can be performed on 14 components in the following audit areas: cash, loans and borrowings, taxation, exceptional items and equity.
We then identied four components as individually relevant to the Group due to signicant risks or an area of higher assessed risk of material misstatement of the Group Financial Statements being associated with the components.
For the above individually relevant components, we identied the signicant accounts where audit work needed to be performed at these components by applying professional judgement, having considered the Group signicant accounts on which centralised procedures will be performed, the reasons for identifying the nancial reporting component as an individually relevant component and the size of the component's account balance relative to the Group signicant nancial statement account balance.
We then considered whether the remaining Group signicant account balances not yet subject to audit procedures, in aggregate, could give rise to a risk of material misstatement of the Group Financial Statements. We selected one component of the Group to include in our audit scope to address these risks.
Having identied the components for which work will be performed, we determined the scope to assign to each component.
Of the ve components selected, we designed and performed audit procedures on the entire nancial information of three components ('full scope components'). For one component, we designed and performed audit procedures on specic signicant nancial statement account balances or disclosures of the nancial information of the component ('specic scope components'). For one component, we performed specied audit procedures to obtain evidence for one or more relevant assertions.
Our scoping to address the risk of material misstatement for each key audit matter is set out in the Key audit matters section of our report.
In establishing our overall approach to the Group audit, we determined the type of work that needed to be undertaken at each of the components by us, as the Group audit engagement team, or by component auditors operating under our instruction.
Of the ve components selected, audit procedures were performed on four of these directly by the Group audit team. For the component not audited by the Group team, we determined the appropriate level of involvement to enable us to determine that sufcient audit evidence had been obtained as a basis for our opinion on the Group as a whole.
During the current year's audit cycle, the Group audit team visited the component team in the US. This involved meeting with our local component team to discuss the audit approach, understanding the signicant audit ndings, reviewing relevant working papers in risk areas, and meeting with local management.
The Group team interacted regularly with the component team where appropriate during various stages of the audit, reviewed relevant working papers and were responsible for the scope and direction of the audit process. Where relevant, the section on key audit matters details the level of involvement we had with component auditors to enable us to determine that sufcient audit evidence had been obtained as a basis for our opinion on the Group as a whole. This, together with the additional procedures performed at Group level, gave us appropriate evidence for our opinion on the Group Financial Statements.
Stakeholders are increasingly interested in how climate change will impact Watches of Switzerland Group PLC. The Group has determined that the most signicant future impacts from climate change on its operations will be from extreme weather events disrupting ofces and distribution centres as well as the supply chain, increased ofce and showroom energy requirements for heating and cooling, the costs of complying with environmental legislation and from changing expectations from stakeholders. These are explained on pages 114 to 131 in the required Task Force On Climate-Related Financial Disclosures and on pages 150 to 153 in the principal risks and uncertainties. They have also explained their climate commitments on pages 148 to 153. All of these disclosures form part of the 'Other information', rather than the audited Financial Statements.
Our procedures on these unaudited disclosures therefore consisted solely of considering whether they are materially inconsistent with the Financial Statements or our knowledge obtained in the course of the audit or otherwise appear to be materially misstated, in line with our responsibilities on 'Other information'.
In planning and performing our audit we assessed the potential impacts of climate change on the Group's business and any consequential material impact on its Financial Statements.
The Group has explained in note 1 how they have reected the impact of climate change in their Financial Statements including how this aligns with their commitment to the aspirations of the Paris Agreement to achieve net zero emissions by 2050. Signicant judgements and estimates relating to climate change have been factored into the Directors' showroom asset impairment assessment. These considerations did not have a material impact on the Financial Statements.
Our audit effort in considering the impact of climate change on the Financial Statements was focused on evaluating management's assessment of the impact of climate risk, physical and transition, their climate commitments, the effects of material climate risks disclosed on pages 123 to 125 and the signicant judgements and estimates disclosed in note 1 and whether these have been appropriately reected in asset values where these are impacted by future cash ows and associated sensitivity disclosures, being the showroom asset impairment testing (see notes 12 and 13), following the requirements of UK adopted international accounting standards. As part of this evaluation, we
performed our own risk assessment, supported by our climate change internal specialists, to determine the risks of material misstatement in the Financial Statements from climate change which needed to be considered in our audit.
We also challenged the directors' considerations of climate change risks in their assessment of going concern and viability and associated disclosures. Where considerations of climate change were relevant to our assessment of going concern, these are described above.
Based on our work, whilst we have not identied the impact of climate change on the Financial Statements to be a standalone key audit matter, we have considered the impact on the showroom impairment key audit matter. Details of the impact, our procedures and ndings are included in our explanation of key audit matter below.
Key audit matters are those matters that, in our professional judgement, were of most signicance in our audit of the Financial Statements of the current period and include the most signicant assessed risks of material misstatement (whether or not due to fraud) that we identied. These matters included those which had the greatest effect on the overall audit strategy, the allocation of resources in the audit; and directing the efforts of the engagement team. These matters were addressed in the context of our audit of the Financial Statements as a whole, and in our opinion thereon, and we do not provide a separate opinion on these matters.
Refer to the Audit and Risk Committee Report (page 178); Accounting policies (page 227); and Note 4 and 12 of the Consolidated Financial Statements (page 246)
Cash generating units ('CGU') should be reviewed for indicators of impairment at each reporting period end. Forecasts and discount rates used in assessing showroom impairment are judgemental and involve
estimates of future trading which involves uncertainty. In particular, there is a risk of impairment as a result of the current consumer landscape which adds greater uncertainty on future showroom performance particularly in respect of non-supply constrained brands.
Based on our procedures over showroom asset impairment no material misstatements were identied.
We consider the showroom asset impairment recognised to be materially stated and appropriately disclosed in exceptional items.
Management has appropriately included sensitivity analysis disclosures in note 12 to the Financial Statements to reect the level of estimation uncertainty.
| Risk | Our response to the risk | Key observations communicated to the Audit and Risk Committee |
||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Inventory valuation – £447.4m of inventory, (FY24 £393.3m) |
– We understood and assessed the design effectiveness and implementation of management's controls over the inventory valuation and provision calculation process. |
Based on our procedures we consider the valuation of inventory to be materiality appropriate. |
||
| Refer to the Audit and Risk Committee Report (page 178); Accounting policies (page 227); and Note 15 of the Consolidated Financial Statements (page 249) |
– We enquired of key members of nance and the merchandising team to understand inventory levels, ageing and plans for discontinuation. |
|||
| The Group sells luxury goods, which have a high carrying value and are subject to changing consumer trends. |
– We assessed management's judgements and assumptions used in determining the inventory provision to challenge if they were appropriate and supportable and recalculated the provision. We understood the |
|||
| Management applies judgement to anticipate the saleability of on-hand inventory and to evaluate the liquidation of slow moving and discontinued inventory |
sensitivity of these assumptions to change. – We assessed the level of provisioning by specic brand and compared this |
|||
| when calculating the inventory provision. There is greater risk on the inventory provision for products where margins tend to be lower, more |
to performance in the year and stock turn. We directed greater attention to the products likely to be impacted by cost of living challenges as well as pre-owned inventory. |
|||
| variable and impacted by changes in the consumer landscape such as jewellery and non-super high demand products. |
– We inspected the value of inventory sold at less than cost during the period and challenged management on whether a provision was required for any such products that remain on hand at year-end. |
|||
| There is also a heightened risk on the valuation of second-hand watch inventory, including Rolex Certied Pre-Owned, given the recoverable amount |
– In assessing the reasonableness of management's methodology, we have considered the historical level of provisioning and subsequent utilisation and releases to determine the accuracy of prior provisions. |
|||
| is subject to uctuations in second hand market prices. | Audit work performed to address this risk was undertaken by the Group audit team and the component audit team. For details of our involvement with the component team refer to the section above on Involvement with component team. |
|||
| Revenue recognition including the risk of management override – £1,651.5m Revenue (FY24 £1,537.9m) |
– We understood and assessed the design effectiveness and implementation of management's controls over the revenue recognition process. |
We did not identify any evidence of management override through the use of manual journal entries. |
||
| Refer to the Audit and risk Committee Report (page 178); Accounting policies (page 227); and note 2 and 3 of the Consolidated Financial Statements (pages 234 to 236) |
– We performed analytical review procedures to understand the revenue trends compared to the prior period, budget and post year-end to identify areas that warrant further investigation. |
Based on our procedures in respect of deposits no material misstatements were identied. |
||
| Our assessment is that the majority of the Group's revenue transactions are non-complex, with no judgement applied over the amount recorded. |
– For the full scope components and specic scope component (totalling 99.4% of Group revenue), we utilised data analytic procedures to test the entire population of postings from Revenue to Cash, correlating the cash |
|||
| Revenue recognition is a signicant risk by presumption due to the risk of material misstatements as a result of |
conversion of sales. For a sample of these items, we then veried the revenue to the receipt and bank statement. |
|||
| fraudulent or erroneous nancial reporting. We consider the revenue recognition signicant risk to be in the following areas: |
– Using data analytic tools, we identied material manual adjustments to revenue that do not follow the core processes such as postings for deferred revenue on deposits for further investigation and corroboration |
|||
| – Manual adjustments to revenue; and | to other audit procedures. | |||
| – Completeness of deferred customer deposits (occurrence of revenue) |
– We tested the completeness of deposits through the use of data analytics procedures on showroom margins and by testing a sample of deposit releases to revenue in the period conrming the goods were collected before the period end date by inspecting receipts. |
|||
| – We tested material consolidation adjustments to revenue and assessed whether they are appropriate. |
||||
| – We assessed the year-end consignment revenue accrual estimate through analysing historical trends and current performance. |
||||
| Audit work performed to address this risk was undertaken by the Group audit team and the component audit team. For details of our involvement with the component team refer to the section above on Involvement with component team. |
The following changes have been made to our key audit matters in the current year:
– The revenue recognition key audit matter, previously included a risk on sales returns. This is no longer considered to be a signicant risk following our risk assessment procedures and lack of historical audit differences.
We apply the concept of materiality in planning and performing the audit, in evaluating the effect of identied misstatements on the audit and in forming our audit opinion.
The magnitude of an omission or misstatement that, individually or in the aggregate, could reasonably be expected to inuence the economic decisions of the users of the Financial Statements. Materiality provides a basis for determining the nature and extent of our audit procedures.
We determined materiality for the Group to be £6.7 million (2024: £6.2 million), which is 5% (2024: 5%) of prot before tax and exceptional items. We believe that prot before tax and exceptional items provides us with an appropriate basis for setting materiality as it is not distorted by exceptional items which are both material and occur infrequently and which may uctuate from period to period. This measure represents Adjusted PBT adding back the impact of IFRS 16 since this reoccurs each year.
We determined materiality for the Parent Company to be £9.2 million (2024: £9.4 million), which is 2% (2024: 2%) of equity due to the main purpose of the entity being an investment holding company which does not trade. When auditing balances included within to the Group Financial Statements we reduced this down to the Group materiality.
During the course of our audit, we reassessed initial materiality and trued this up to nal results to reect the full year actual prot before tax and exceptional items.
| STARTING BASIS |
Prot before tax – £75.9m |
|---|---|
| ADJUSTMENTS | – Exceptional items – £57.7m |
| MATERIALITY | – Totals £133.6m – Materiality of £6.7m (5% of materiality basis) |
The application of materiality at the individual account or balance level. It is set at an amount to reduce to an appropriately low level the probability that the aggregate of uncorrected and undetected misstatements exceeds materiality.
On the basis of our risk assessments, together with our assessment of the Group's overall control environment, our judgement was that performance materiality was 75% (2024: 75%) of our planning materiality, namely £5.0 million (2024: £4.6 million). We have set performance materiality at this percentage as we did not anticipate a signicant level of audit differences following our 2024 audit.
Audit work was undertaken at component locations for the purpose of responding to the assessed risks of material misstatement of the Group Financial Statements. The performance materiality set for each component is based on the relative scale and risk of the component to the Group as a whole and our assessment of the risk of misstatement at that component. In the current year, the range of performance materiality allocated to components was £1.0 million to £4.9 million (2024: £0.9 million to £4.6 million).
We agreed with the Audit and Risk Committee that we would report to them all uncorrected audit differences in excess of £0.33 million (2024: £0.31 million), which is set at 5% of planning materiality, as well as differences below that threshold that, in our view, warranted reporting on qualitative grounds.
We evaluate any uncorrected misstatements against both the quantitative measures of materiality discussed above and in light of other relevant qualitative considerations in forming our opinion.
The other information comprises the information included in the Annual Report and Accounts set out on pages 1 to 213, other than the Financial Statements and our auditor's report thereon. The directors are responsible for the other information contained within the Annual Report and Accounts.
Our opinion on the Financial Statements does not cover the other information and, except to the extent otherwise explicitly stated in this report, we do not express any form of assurance conclusion thereon.
Our responsibility is to read the other information and, in doing so, consider whether the other information is materially inconsistent with the Financial Statements or our knowledge obtained in the course of the audit or otherwise appears to be materially misstated. If we identify such material inconsistencies or apparent material misstatements, we are required to determine whether this gives rise to a material misstatement in the Financial Statements themselves. If, based on the work we have performed, we conclude that there is a material misstatement of the other information, we are required to report that fact.
We have nothing to report in this regard.
In our opinion, the part of the directors' remuneration report to be audited has been properly prepared in accordance with the Companies Act 2006.
In the light of the knowledge and understanding of the Group and the Parent Company and its environment obtained in the course of the audit, we have not identied material misstatements in the strategic report or the directors' report.
We have nothing to report in respect of the following matters in relation to which the Companies Act 2006 requires us to report to you if, in our opinion:
We have reviewed the directors' statement in relation to going concern, longer-term viability and that part of the Corporate Governance Statement relating to the Group and company's compliance with the provisions of the UK Corporate Governance Code specied for our review by the UK Listing Rules.
Based on the work undertaken as part of our audit, we have concluded that each of the following elements of the Corporate Governance Statement is materially consistent with the Financial Statements or our knowledge obtained during the audit:
As explained more fully in the directors' responsibilities statement set out on page 211, the directors are responsible for the preparation of the Financial Statements and for being satised that they give a true and fair view, and for such internal control as the directors determine is necessary to enable the preparation of Financial Statements that are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error.
In preparing the Financial Statements, the directors are responsible for assessing the Group and Parent Company's ability to continue as a going concern, disclosing, as applicable, matters related to going concern and using the going concern basis of accounting unless the directors either intend to liquidate the Group or the Parent Company or to cease operations, or have no realistic alternative but to do so.
Our objectives are to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the Financial Statements as a whole are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error, and to issue an auditor's report that includes our opinion. Reasonable assurance is a high level of assurance, but is not a guarantee that an audit conducted in accordance with ISAs (UK) will always detect a material misstatement when it exists. Misstatements can arise from fraud or error and are considered material if, individually or in the aggregate, they could reasonably be expected to inuence the economic decisions of users taken on the basis of these Financial Statements.
Irregularities, including fraud, are instances of non-compliance with laws and regulations. We design procedures in line with our responsibilities, outlined above, to detect irregularities, including fraud. The risk of not detecting a material misstatement due to fraud is higher than the risk of not detecting one resulting from error, as fraud may involve deliberate concealment by, for example, forgery or intentional misrepresentations, or through collusion. The extent to which our procedures are capable of detecting irregularities, including fraud is detailed below.
However, the primary responsibility for the prevention and detection of fraud rests with both those charged with governance of the company and management.
We obtained an understanding of the legal and regulatory frameworks that are applicable to the Group and determined that the most signicant are frameworks which are directly relevant to specic assertions in the Financial Statements are those that relate to the reporting framework (UK adopted international accounting standards, FRS 102, the Companies Act 2006 and UK Corporate Governance Code). In addition, we concluded that there are certain signicant laws and regulations which may have an effect on the determination of the amounts and disclosures in the Financial Statements being the Listing Rules of the UK Listing Authority, and those laws and regulations relating to General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), health and safety and employee matters.
We understood how Watches of Switzerland Group PLC is complying with those frameworks by making enquiries of management, Internal Audit, those responsible for legal and compliance matters and the Company Secretary and General Counsel. We conrmed our enquiries through our review of Board minutes, papers provided to the Audit & Risk Committee and correspondence received from regulatory bodies.
We assessed the susceptibility of the Group's Financial Statements to material misstatement, including how fraud might occur by meeting with management and Internal Audit to understand where they considered there was susceptibility to fraud. We also considered performance targets and the potential incentives or opportunities to manage earnings or inuence the perceptions of analysts. We considered the programmes and controls that the Group has established to address risks identied, or that otherwise prevent, deter and detect fraud; and how Senior Management monitors those programmes and controls. Where the risk was considered to be higher, we performed audit procedures to address each identied fraud risk as discussed in the key audit matters section above. These procedures included testing manual journals and were designed to provide reasonable assurance that the Financial Statements were free from material fraud.
Based on this understanding we designed our audit procedures to identify non-compliance with such laws and regulations. Our procedures involved understanding management's internal controls over compliance with laws and regulations; reviewing internal audit reports and whistleblowing investigation reports provided to the Audit and Risk Committee; making enquiries of legal counsel, Group management, Internal Audit; involving the use of management and EY specialists; and journal entry testing, with a focus on manual consolidation journals and journals indicating large or unusual transactions based on our understanding of the business.
Specic enquiries were made with the component team to conrm any non-compliance with laws and regulations and this was reported through their audit deliverables. Further, the Group team would communicate any instances of non-compliance with laws and regulations to the component team through our regular interactions.
A further description of our responsibilities for the audit of the Financial Statements is located on the Financial Reporting Council's website at https://www.frc.org.uk/auditorsresponsibilities. This description forms part of our auditor's report.
This report is made solely to the company's members, as a body, in accordance with Chapter 3 of Part 16 of the Companies Act 2006. Our audit work has been undertaken so that we might state to the company's members those matters we are required to state to them in an auditor's report and for no other purpose. To the fullest extent permitted by law, we do not accept or assume responsibility to anyone other than the company and the company's members as a body, for our audit work, for this report, or for the opinions we have formed.
2 July 2025
| Note | 52 week period ended 27 April 2025 £m |
52 week period ended 28 April 2024 £m |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | 2, 3 | 1,651.5 | 1,537.9 |
| Cost of sales | (1,438.3) | (1,348.5) | |
| Exceptional cost of sales | 4 | (2.0) | 0.5 |
| GROSS PROFIT | 211.2 | 189.9 | |
| Administrative expenses | (43.6) | (37.5) | |
| Exceptional impairment of assets | 4 | (46.5) | (26.2) |
| Exceptional other administrative expenses | 4 | (7.0) | (6.2) |
| Share of loss of joint venture and associates | 11 | (0.2) | – |
| OPERATING PROFIT | 113.9 | 120.0 | |
| Finance costs | 7 | (38.1) | (29.5) |
| Finance income | 7 | 2.3 | 2.9 |
| Exceptional nance costs | 4, 7 | (2.2) | (1.3) |
| NET FINANCE COST | (38.0) | (27.9) | |
| Pro t before taxation |
75.9 | 92.1 | |
| Taxation | 8 | (22.1) | (33.0) |
| Pro t for the nancial period |
53.8 | 59.1 | |
| EARNINGS PER SHARE | |||
| Basic | 9 | 22.8p | 25.0p |
| Diluted | 9 | 22.7p | 24.8p |
The notes on pages 227 to 263 are an integral part of these Consolidated Financial Statements.
| 52 week period ended 27 April 2025 |
52 week period ended 28 April 2024 |
||
|---|---|---|---|
| Note | £m | £m | |
| Pro t for the nancial period |
53.8 | 59.1 | |
| Other comprehensive (expense)/income: | |||
| ITEMS THAT MAY BE RECLASSIFIED TO PROFIT OR LOSS | |||
| Foreign exchange (loss)/gain on translation of foreign operations | (15.2) | 1.7 | |
| Related current tax movements | 8 | 1.1 | (0.1) |
| (14.1) | 1.6 | ||
| ITEMS THAT WILL NOT BE RECLASSIFIED TO PROFIT OR LOSS | |||
| Actuarial movements on dened benet pension scheme | 20 | 0.1 | (0.9) |
| Related deferred tax movements | 8 | – | 0.2 |
| 0.1 | (0.7) | ||
| Other comprehensive (expense)/income for the period | (14.0) | 0.9 | |
| Total comprehensive income for the period | 39.8 | 60.0 |
The notes on pages 227 to 263 are an integral part of these Consolidated Financial Statements.
| Note | 27 April 2025 £m |
28 April 2024 £m |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| ASSETS | |||
| NON-CURRENT ASSETS | |||
| Goodwill | 10 | 231.2 | 199.3 |
| Intangible assets | 10 | 72.9 | 16.4 |
| Property, plant and equipment | 12 | 192.4 | 191.4 |
| Right-of-use assets | 13 | 358.6 | 381.8 |
| Investment in joint venture and associates | 11 | 0.5 | – |
| Deferred tax assets | 8 | 4.1 | 0.4 |
| Post-employment benet asset | 20 | 0.5 | – |
| Trade and other receivables | 14 | 4.5 | 2.1 |
| 864.7 | 791.4 | ||
| CURRENT ASSETS | |||
| Inventories | 15 | 447.4 | 393.3 |
| Current tax asset | 8.6 | 4.5 | |
| Trade and other receivables | 14 | 56.0 | 22.5 |
| Cash and cash equivalents | 16 | 98.9 | 115.7 |
| 610.9 | 536.0 | ||
| Total assets | 1,475.6 | 1,327.4 | |
| LIABILITIES | |||
| CURRENT LIABILITIES | |||
| Trade and other payables | 17 | (254.9) | (215.4) |
| Current tax liability | (0.5) | – | |
| Lease liabilities | 13 | (56.0) | (57.0) |
| Provisions | 18 | (2.4) | (1.9) |
| (313.8) | (274.3) | ||
| NON-CURRENT LIABILITIES | |||
| Trade and other payables | 17 | (4.6) | (1.1) |
| Deferred tax liabilities | 8 | (15.9) | (3.4) |
| Lease liabilities | 13 | (398.6) | (403.4) |
| Borrowings | 19 | (192.8) | (113.3) |
| Post-employment benet obligations | 20 | – | (0.2) |
| Provisions | 18 | (10.3) | (8.7) |
| (622.2) | (530.1) | ||
| Total liabilities | (936.0) | (804.4) | |
| Net assets | 539.6 | 523.0 | |
| EQUITY | |||
| Share capital | 21 | 3.0 | 3.0 |
| Share premium | 21 | 147.1 | 147.1 |
| Merger reserve | 21 | (2.2) | (2.2) |
| Other reserves | 21 | (13.3) | (23.4) |
| Retained earnings | 21 | 414.7 | 394.1 |
| Foreign exchange reserve | 21 | (9.7) | 4.4 |
| Total equity | 539.6 | 523.0 |
The notes on pages 227 to 263 are an integral part of these Consolidated Financial Statements.
The Consolidated Financial Statements were approved and authorised for issue by the Board and were signed on its behalf by:
L A ROMBERG CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER Date: 2 July 2025
| Share capital £m |
Share premium £m |
Merger reserve £m |
Other reserves £m |
Retained earnings £m |
Foreign exchange reserve £m |
Total equity attributable to owners £m |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Balance at 30 April 2023 | 3.0 | 147.1 | (2.2) | (18.4) | 337.0 | 2.8 | 469.3 |
| Prot for the nancial period | – | – | – | – | 59.1 | – | 59.1 |
| Other comprehensive income, net of tax | – | – | – | – | (0.7) | 1.6 | 0.9 |
| Total comprehensive income | – | – | – | – | 58.4 | 1.6 | 60.0 |
| Purchase of own shares for share schemes | – | – | – | (7.2) | – | – | (7.2) |
| Share-based payment charge (note 22) | – | – | – | – | 2.1 | – | 2.1 |
| Share-based payments exercised | – | – | – | 2.2 | (2.2) | – | – |
| Tax on items credited to equity | – | – | – | – | (1.1) | – | (1.1) |
| Tax on vested shares moved to current tax | – | – | – | – | (0.1) | – | (0.1) |
| Total other transactions | – | – | – | (5.0) | (1.3) | – | (6.3) |
| Balance at 28 April 2024 | 3.0 | 147.1 | (2.2) | (23.4) | 394.1 | 4.4 | 523.0 |
| Prot for the nancial period | – | – | – | – | 53.8 | – | 53.8 |
| Other comprehensive income, net of tax | – | – | – | – | 0.1 | (14.1) | (14.0) |
| Total comprehensive income | – | – | – | – | 53.9 | (14.1) | 39.8 |
| Purchase of own shares for cancellation (note 21) | – | – | – | (12.1) | – | – | (12.1) |
| Own shares cancelled (note 21) | – | – | – | 11.3 | (11.3) | – | – |
| Committed share buyback | – | – | – | – | (12.9) | – | (12.9) |
| Share-based payment charge (note 22) | – | – | – | – | 1.8 | – | 1.8 |
| Share-based payments exercised | – | – | – | 10.9 | (10.9) | – | – |
| Tax on items credited to equity | – | – | – | – | 0.4 | – | 0.4 |
| Tax on vested shares moved to current tax | – | – | – | – | (0.4) | – | (0.4) |
| Total other transactions | – | – | – | 10.1 | (33.3) | – | (23.2) |
| Balance at 27 April 2025 | 3.0 | 147.1 | (2.2) | (13.3) | 414.7 | (9.7) | 539.6 |
| 52 week period | 52 week period | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Note | ended 27 April 2025 £m |
ended 28 April 2024 £m |
||
| CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES | ||||
| Pro t for the period |
53.8 | 59.1 | ||
| Adjustments for: | ||||
| Depreciation of property, plant and equipment | 12 | 40.8 | 39.7 | |
| Depreciation of right-of-use assets | 13 | 54.5 | 54.8 | |
| Depreciation of right-of-use assets – exceptional items (note 4) | 13 | 2.0 | 1.2 | |
| Amortisation of intangible assets | 10 | 3.3 | 3.6 | |
| Impairment of right-of-use assets – exceptional items (note 4) | 13 | 26.8 | 16.4 | |
| Impairment of property, plant and equipment – exceptional items (note 4) | 12 | 19.7 | 9.8 | |
| Loss on disposal of property, plant and equipment | 12 | 0.2 | 1.1 | |
| Loss on disposal of property, plant and equipment – exceptional items (note 4) | 12 | 0.6 | – | |
| Loss on disposal of intangibles | 10 | 0.2 | – | |
| Gain on lease modications and disposals | 13 | (5.5) | (0.8) | |
| Share-based payment charge | 22 | 1.8 | 2.1 | |
| Share of loss of joint venture and associates | 11 | 0.2 | – | |
| Finance income | 7 | (2.3) | (2.9) | |
| Finance costs | 7 | 38.1 | 29.5 | |
| Finance costs – exceptional items (note 4) | 7 | 2.2 | 1.3 | |
| Taxation | 8 | 22.1 | 33.0 | |
| Increase in inventory | (13.3) | (11.3) | ||
| Increase in debtors | (18.2) | (4.4) | ||
| Decrease in creditors, provisions and pensions | (12.9) | (6.7) | ||
| Cash generated from operations | 214.1 | 225.5 | ||
| Pension scheme contributions | 20 | (0.7) | (0.7) | |
| Tax paid | (29.7) | (33.5) | ||
| Total net cash generated from operating activities | 183.7 | 191.3 | ||
| CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES | ||||
| Purchase of non-current assets: | ||||
| Property, plant and equipment additions | 12 | (68.0) | (81.6) | |
| Intangible asset additions | 10 | (3.6) | (2.4) | |
| Movement on capital expenditure accrual | (3.8) | 4.1 | ||
| Cash outšow from purchase of non-current assets | (75.4) | (79.9) | ||
| Interest received | 2.3 | 3.0 | ||
| Investment in joint venture and associates | (0.7) | – | ||
| Disposal of European property, plant and equipment | 13 12 |
2.7 | – | |
| Acquisition of subsidiaries net of cash acquired | 25 | (106.9) | (44.2) | |
| Total net cash outšow from investing activities | (178.0) | (121.1) | ||
| CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES | ||||
| Purchase of own shares for share schemes | – | (7.2) | ||
| Purchase of own shares for cancellation | 21 | (11.3) | – | |
| Proceeds/(repayment) of term loan | 19 | 99.5 | (120.0) | |
| Net movement on multicurrency revolving loan facility | 19 | (13.8) | 115.0 | |
| Costs directly attributable to raising new loan facility | 19 | (1.5) | (2.2) | |
| Payment of capital element of leases | 13 | (56.2) | (46.0) | |
| Payment of interest element of leases | 13 13 |
(24.4) | (22.1) | |
| Interest paid | (13.4) | (9.2) | ||
| Net cash outšow from nancing activities |
(21.1) | (91.7) | ||
| Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents | (15.4) | (21.5) | ||
| Cash and cash equivalents at the beginning of the period | 115.7 | 136.4 | ||
| Exchange (losses)/gains on cash and cash equivalents | (1.4) | 0.8 | ||
| Cash and cash equivalents at the end of period | 98.9 | 115.7 | ||
| Comprised of: | ||||
| Cash at bank and in hand | 16 | 80.4 | 93.8 | |
| Cash in transit | 16 | 18.5 | 21.9 | |
| Cash and cash equivalents at end of period | 98.9 | 115.7 | ||
Watches of Switzerland Group PLC (the 'Company') is a public limited company, limited by shares, which is listed on the London Stock Exchange and incorporated and domiciled in England and Wales. The address of the registered ofce is Aurum House, 2 Elland Road, Braunstone, Leicester, LE3 1TT. The Company and its subsidiaries together form the Group.
The principal activity of the Group is the selling of luxury watches and jewellery, in showrooms, online and via wholesale. At the balance sheet date, the Group was trading from 148 UK and Europe based showrooms, and 60 US based showrooms. The Group mainly trades under seven prestigious brands: Watches of Switzerland (UK and US), Mappin & Webb (UK), Goldsmiths (UK), Mayors (US), Betteridge (US), Analog:Shift (US) and Hodinkee (US), with a complementary jewellery offering. Since 8 May 2024, the Group has also owned the exclusive distribution rights for Roberto Coin in the US, Canada, Central America and the Caribbean.
The Consolidated Financial Statements are presented in Pounds Sterling (£), which is the Group's presentational currency, and are shown in £millions to one decimal place.
The Consolidated Financial Statements include the nancial statements of the Company and its subsidiary undertakings made up to 27 April 2025. A subsidiary is an entity that is controlled by the parent. The nancial year represents the 52 weeks to 27 April 2025 (prior nancial year 52 weeks to 28 April 2024). The nancial year-end date is determined to be the Sunday closest to 30 April each year.
The Consolidated Financial Statements are prepared in accordance with UK adopted international accounting standards. The Consolidated Financial Statements have been prepared under the historical cost convention except for pension assets which are measured at fair value.
The Directors consider that the Group has, at the time of approving the Group Consolidated Financial Statements, adequate resources to remain in operation for the foreseeable future and have therefore continued to adopt the going concern basis in preparing the consolidated information.
On 13 December 2024, the Group renanced and repaid its \$115.0 million term loan facility which was originally taken out to nance the Roberto Coin Inc. acquisition with a new £150.0 million facility, being made up of a £100.0 million Term Loan and £50.0 million multicurrency revolving credit facility. The £100.0 million was drawn down on 13 December 2024 as USD \$125.0 million and no further drawdown on the £100.0 million is permitted. The new facilities run coterminously with the existing UK bank facility of £225.0 million. The going concern assessment has been carried out taking into account all facilities now in place.
The key covenant tests attached to all Group facilities are a measure of net debt to EBITDA, and the Fixed Charge Cover Ratio (FCCR) at each April and October. The facility covenants are on a pre-IFRS 16 basis and exclude share-based payment costs. Net debt to EBITDA is dened as the ratio of total net debt at the reporting date to the last 12 month Adjusted EBITDA. This ratio must not exceed 3. The FCCR is the ratio of Adjusted EBITDA plus rent to the total nance charge and rent for the 12 months to the reporting date. This ratio must exceed 1.6. At 27 April 2025 the Group comfortably satised the covenant tests with net debt to EBITDA being less than 3 and the FCCR exceeding 1.6.
At the balance sheet date, the Group had a total of £368.9 million in available committed facilities, of which £195.1 million was drawn down. Net debt at this date was £96.2 million. Liquidity headroom (dened as unrestricted cash plus undrawn available facilities) was £253.5 million. All bank facilities run coterminously and are due to expire in May 2028. Further detail can be found in borrowings note 19 within the Consolidated Financial Statements.
In assessing whether the going concern basis of accounting is appropriate, the Directors have reviewed various trading scenarios for the period to 31 October 2026 from the date of this report. These included:
Under the base case forecast, the Group has signicant liquidity and complies with all covenant tests to 31 October 2026. The forecast reects current visibility of supply from key brands and conrmed showroom refurbishments, openings and closures, and excludes uncommitted capital projects and acquisitions which would only occur if expected to be incremental to the business.
– Severe but plausible scenarios of:
Under these scenarios the net debt to EBITDA and the FCCR covenants would be complied with.
The Directors also considered whether there were any events or conditions occurring just outside the going concern period that should be considered in their assessment, including whether the going concern period needed to be extended.
As a result of the above analysis, including potential severe but plausible scenarios and the reverse stress test, the Board believes that the Group and Company is able to adequately manage its nancing and principal risks, and that the Group and Company will be able to operate within the level of its facilities and meet the required covenants for the period to 31 October 2026. For this reason, the Board considers it appropriate for the Group and Company to adopt the going concern basis in preparing the Consolidated Financial Statements.
In preparing the Consolidated Financial Statements management has considered the impact of climate change, particularly in the context of the disclosures included in the Strategic Report. These considerations did not have a material impact on the Consolidated Financial Statements, including the Group's going concern assessment to 31 October 2026 and the viability of the Group over the next three years (refer to the Viability Statement on page 155).
The Group presents as exceptional items on the face of the Consolidated Income Statement those items of income and expense which, because of their size, nature or the expected infrequency of the events giving rise to them, merit separate presentation to provide a better understanding of the elements of nancial performance in the nancial period, so as to assess trends in nancial performance. Further details on exceptional items are given within note 4.
The Group has identied certain measures that it believes will assist the understanding of the performance of the business. These APMs are not dened or specied under the requirements of IFRS.
The Group believes that these APMs, which are not considered to be a substitute for, or superior to, IFRS measures, provide stakeholders with additional useful information on the underlying trends, performance and position of the Group and are consistent with how business performance is measured internally. The APMs are not dened by IFRS and therefore may not be directly comparable with other companies' APMs.
The key APMs that the Group uses include: Net Margin, Adjusted EBITDA, Adjusted EBIT and Adjusted Earnings Per Share. These APMs are set out in the Glossary on pages 270 to 273, including explanations of how they are calculated and how they are reconciled to a statutory measure where relevant.
The Group makes certain adjustments to the statutory prot measures in order to derive many of these APMs. The Group's policy is to exclude items that are considered non-underlying and exceptional due to their size, nature or incidence, and are not considered to be part of the normal operating costs of the Group. Treatment as an adjusting item provides stakeholders with additional useful information to assess the year-on-year trading performance of the Group but should not be considered in isolation of statutory measures.
The Consolidated Financial Statements are presented in Pounds Sterling (£), which is the Group's presentational currency, and are shown in £millions to one decimal place. The Group includes foreign entities whose functional currencies are not Pounds Sterling (£). On consolidation, the assets and liabilities of those entities are translated at the exchange rates at the balance sheet date and income and expenses are translated at average rates during the period. Translation differences are recognised in other comprehensive income.
Transactions in currencies other than an entity's functional currency are recorded at the exchange rate on the transaction date, whilst assets and liabilities are translated at exchange rates at the balance sheet date. Exchange differences are recognised in the Consolidated Income Statement.
Operating segments are reported in a manner consistent with the internal reporting provided to the Chief Operating Decision-Makers (CODMs). The CODMs, who are responsible for allocating resources and assessing performance of the operating segments, have been identied as the Chief Executive Ofcer and Chief Financial Ofcer of the Group. The CODMs review the key prot measures Adjusted Earnings Before Interest, Tax, Depreciation and Amortisation (EBITDA) and Adjusted Earnings Before Interest and Tax (EBIT), both shown pre-exceptional items and IFRS 16.
The Group is in the business of selling luxury watches and jewellery and providing ongoing services to our customers, such as repairs and servicing. Revenue from contracts with customers is recognised when control of the goods or services is transferred to the customer at an amount that reects the consideration to which the Group expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. The Group has concluded that it is the principal in its revenue arrangements because it controls the goods or services before transferring them to the customer.
In determining the transaction price for the sale of goods, the Group considers the existence of signicant nancing components.
Revenue from sale of goods is recognised at the point in time when control of the asset is transferred to the customer, generally on delivery of the goods.
Sales of goods are recognised when a Group entity sells a product to the customer and control of the goods is transferred to the customer. Retail sales are usually settled in cash or by credit card. It is the Group's policy to sell its products to the retail customer with a right to return within 14 days for a cash refund and 30 days for a product exchange. The Group does not operate any loyalty programmes.
Where sales are made on credit provided by a third-party, revenue is recognised immediately on sale of the product and control has been passed to the customer. The Group offers Interest Free Credit on certain goods and the cost of this product is netted against revenue.
Sales of goods are recognised when a Group entity sells a product to a customer and control of the goods is transferred to the customer. This is either upon delivery to customers, or for consigned inventory, the date of sell through by the customer, provided the sales price is xed, title has transferred, and collectability of the resulting receivable is reasonably assured.
Revenue from the sale of goods on the internet is recognised at the point that control has passed to the customer, which is the point of delivery. Transactions are settled by credit or payment card. Where sales are made on credit provided by a third-party, revenue is recognised when control has been passed to the customer, on delivery.
Revenue from a contract to provide services, such as product repairs and servicing, is recognised in the period in which the services are provided. Revenue is recognised when the following conditions are satised:
When a contract provides a customer with a right of return, under IFRS 15, the consideration is variable because the contract allows the customer to return the product. The Group uses the expected value method to estimate the goods that will be returned and recognise a refund liability and an asset for the goods to be recovered. Provisions for returned goods are calculated based on future expected levels of returns for each channel, assessed across a variety of factors such as historical trends, economic factors and other measures.
Under IFRS 15, rebates give rise to variable consideration. To estimate this the Group applies the most likely amount method.
A customer deposit or gift card liability is the obligation to transfer goods or services to a customer for which the Group has received consideration. If consideration is received before the Group transfers goods or services to the customer, revenue is deferred and a customer deposit or gift card liability is recognised. Customer deposits and gift cards are recognised as revenue when the customer is passed control of the goods.
Gift card redemptions are estimated on the basis of historical redemptions and are reviewed regularly and updated to reect management's best estimate of patterns of redemption. The estimated non-redemption is recognised in revenue based on historical redemptions.
Included within cost of sales are any items which are directly attributable to the sale of goods and services. This includes the cost of bringing inventory into a condition to sell, wages and salaries, depreciation on land and buildings and ttings and equipment, and other costs directly attributable to the cost of selling goods and services.
Commission income is earned by the Group in showrooms and online through the sale of insurance policies. In addition, the Group issues contracts that transfer insurance risk which are classied as insurance contracts. This activity is completed through the Aurum Insurance (Guernsey) Limited subsidiary which is fully consolidated. The Group manages its risk via its underwriting strategy within its overall risk management framework. Premiums are earned from the date of the attachment of risk, over the indemnity period, based on the pattern of risks underwritten. The earned portion of premiums written is recognised as revenue. Unearned premium represents the proportion of premiums written which is estimated to be earned in future nancial years, calculated separately for each insurance contract using the daily pro-rata method. Claims and claims handling expenses are recognised as incurred based on the estimated cost of settling all liabilities arising on events occurring up to the balance sheet date.
Some employees (including senior executives) of the Group receive remuneration in the form of share-based payments, whereby employees render services as consideration for equity instruments (equity-settled transactions). The fair value of the equity-settled awards is calculated at grant date using a Black-Scholes model. The resulting cost is charged in the Consolidated Income Statement over the vesting period of the option or award and is regularly reviewed and adjusted for the expected and actual number of options or awards vesting. This applies to LTIP Awards, Deferred Share Bonus Schemes, Save as You Earn and Employee Stock Purchase Plan Awards, and Free Share Awards.
Service and non-service performance conditions are not taken into account when determining the grant date fair value of awards, but the likelihood of the conditions being met is assessed as part of the Group's best estimate of the number of equity instruments that will ultimately vest. No expense is recognised for awards that do not ultimately vest because of non-market performance and/ or service conditions that have not been met.
The social security contributions payable in connection with the award of the share options is determined at each balance sheet date as a liability with the total cost recognised in the Consolidated Income Statement over the vesting period.
Own shares represent the shares of Watches of Switzerland Group PLC that are held in an Employee Benet Trust which has been set up for this purpose. The Company adopts a 'look-through' approach which, in substance, accounts for the trust as an extension of the Company. Own shares are recorded at cost and are deducted from equity.
Taxation, comprised of current and deferred tax, is charged or credited to the Consolidated Income Statement unless it relates to items recognised in other comprehensive income or directly in equity. In such cases, the related tax is also recognised in other comprehensive income or directly in equity.
Current tax liabilities are measured at the amount expected to be paid, based on tax rates and laws that are enacted or substantively enacted at the balance sheet date.
Deferred tax is accounted for using the balance sheet liability method and is calculated using rates of taxation enacted or substantively enacted at the balance sheet date which are expected to apply when the asset or liability is settled.
Deferred tax liabilities are generally recognised for all taxable temporary differences. Deferred tax assets are only recognised to the extent that it is probable that taxable prots will be available against which deductible temporary differences can be utilised. Deferred tax is not recognised in respect of investments in subsidiaries where the reversal of any taxable temporary differences can be controlled and are unlikely to reverse in the foreseeable future. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are offset when there is a legally enforceable right to offset and there is an intention to settle the balances on a net basis.
On 23 May 2023, IASB issued 'International Tax Reform-Pillar Two Model Rules – Amendments to IAS 12' in response to the OECD's BEPS Pillar Two model rules. The amendments introduced an immediate, mandatory temporary exception (IAS 12 Para 4A) from the requirement for companies to recognise and disclose deferred tax assets and liabilities related to Pillar Two income taxes. The Group has applied the mandatory temporary exception at 27 April 2025.
Business combinations are accounted for using the acquisition method. The cost of an acquisition is measured as the aggregate of the consideration transferred, which is measured at acquisition date fair value, and the amount of any noncontrolling interests in the acquiree. Acquisition-related costs are expensed as incurred and included in administrative expenses.
The Group determines that it has acquired a business when the acquired set of activities and assets include an input and a substantive process that together signicantly contribute to the ability to create outputs. The acquired process is considered substantive if it is critical to the ability to continue producing outputs, and the inputs acquired include an organised workforce with the necessary skills, knowledge or experience to perform that process or it signicantly contributes to the ability to continue producing outputs and is considered unique or scarce or cannot be replaced without signicant cost, effort or delay in the ability to continue producing outputs.
When the Group acquires a business, it assesses the nancial assets and liabilities assumed for appropriate classication and designation in accordance with the contractual terms, economic circumstances and pertinent conditions as at the acquisition date.
Any contingent consideration to be transferred by the acquirer will be recognised at fair value at the acquisition date. Contingent consideration classied as an asset or liability that is a nancial instrument and within the scope of IFRS 9 'Financial Instruments', is measured at fair value with the changes in fair value recognised in the statement of prot or loss in accordance with IFRS 9.
Goodwill is initially measured at cost (being the excess of the aggregate of the consideration transferred and the amount recognised for non-controlling interests and any previous interest held over the net identiable assets acquired and liabilities assumed). If the fair value of the net assets acquired is in excess of the aggregate consideration transferred, the Group reassesses whether it has correctly identied all of the assets acquired and all of the liabilities assumed and reviews the procedures used to measure the amount to be recognised at the acquisition date. If the reassessment still results in an excess of the fair value of net assets acquired over the aggregate consideration transferred, then the gain is recognised in prot or loss.
After initial recognition, goodwill is measured at cost less any accumulated impairment losses.
The Group presents its share of prot or loss of joint venture and associates using the equity method under IAS 28 'Investments in Associates and Joint Ventures'. IAS 1.82(c) requires share of the prot or loss of joint venture and associates accounted for using the equity method to be presented in a separate line item on the face of the Consolidated Income Statement. In complying with this requirement, the Group combines the share of prot or loss in one line item.
After application of the equity method, the Group determines whether it is necessary to recognise an impairment loss on its investment. At each reporting date, the Group determines whether there is objective evidence that the investment is impaired. If there is such evidence, the Group calculates the amount of impairment as the difference between the recoverable amount and its carrying value and then recognises the loss within 'Share of prot or loss of joint venture and associates' in the Consolidated Income Statement.
Expenditure on internally generated goodwill and brands is recognised in the Consolidated Income Statement as an expense as incurred.
Other intangible assets that are acquired by the Group are stated at cost less accumulated amortisation and accumulated impairment losses.
The cost of intangible assets acquired in a business combination is capitalised separately from goodwill if the fair value can be measured reliably at the acquisition date.
Intangible assets with indenite useful lives are not amortised, but are tested for impairment annually, either individually or at the cash-generating unit (CGU) level. The assessment of indenite life is reviewed annually to determine whether the indenite life continues to be supportable. If not, the change in useful life from indenite to nite is made on a prospective basis.
Acquired computer software licences are capitalised based on the costs incurred to acquire and bring to use the specic software. Software is measured initially at acquisition cost or costs incurred to develop the asset. Following initial recognition, software is carried at cost less accumulated amortisation. Assets are amortised on a straight-line basis over their estimated useful lives of three to ve years.
Licence agreements to use cloud software are treated as service contracts and expensed in the Consolidated Income Statement, unless the Group has both a contractual right to take possession of the software at any time without signicant penalty, and the ability to run the software independently of the host vendor. In such cases the licence agreement is capitalised as software within intangible assets. Costs to congure or customise a cloud software licence are expensed alongside the related service contract in the Consolidated Income Statement, unless they create a separately identiable resource controlled by the Group, in which case they are capitalised.
Amortisation is charged to the Consolidated Income Statement on a straightline basis over the estimated useful lives of intangible assets. Amortisation is recognised wholly within cost of sales. Intangible assets are amortised from the date they are available for use. The estimated useful lives are as follows:
| Computer software | 3 to 5 years |
|---|---|
| Brands | 5 to 30 years |
| Agency agreements | 10 years |
The bases for choosing these useful lives are:
– Brand longevity considering brand history and market awareness
– Agency agreements considering the longevity of the agreements in place with a major supplier
The Group reviews the amortisation period and method when events and circumstances indicate that the useful life may have changed since the last reporting date.
Management accounts for property, plant and equipment under the cost basis of IAS 16 'Property, plant and equipment', rather than applying the alternative (revaluation) treatment. The cost of property, plant and equipment includes directly attributable costs.
Depreciation is provided on the cost of all other assets (except assets in the course of construction), so as to write off the cost, less residual value, on a straight-line basis over the expected useful economic life of the assets concerned, as follows:
| Land and buildings | Lease period |
|---|---|
| Fittings and equipment | 3 to 10 years |
Useful lives and residual values are reviewed at each balance sheet date and revised where expectations are signicantly different from previous estimates. In such cases, the depreciation charge for current and future periods is adjusted accordingly. The impact of climate change on asset lives has also been considered in the period. Asset lives are not affected by climate actions taking place.
The carrying values of non-nancial assets are reviewed at each balance sheet date to determine whether there is any indication of impairment. If any impairment loss arises, the asset is adjusted to its estimated recoverable amount and the difference is recognised in the Income Statement.
Property, plant and equipment and other non-current assets are reviewed for impairment if events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset or a CGU is not recoverable. A CGU is the smallest identiable group of assets that generate independent cash ows which are monitored by management and the CODMs. The Group considers this to be showroom locations or ofces. CGUs are grouped for the purposes of allocating goodwill where the CGU group is expected to benet from synergies, such as sharing of centralised functions and management. Goodwill allocated to groups of CGUs is tested annually for impairment and whenever there is an indication that the goodwill may be impaired.
Impairment testing is performed at several levels and applied in the order set out by IAS 36 'Impairment of assets'. Impairment testing is rst applied to the assets within a CGU where the value of assets held by the CGU are compared to the recoverable value. Impairment testing is then performed at a higher level which compares the value of goodwill to the recoverable value of the associated group of CGUs.
Trade receivables represent outstanding customer balances less an allowance for Expected Credit Losses (ECLs). Trade receivables are recognised when the Group becomes party to the contract which happens when the goods are received and controlled by the end user. They are derecognised when the rights to receive the cash ows have expired e.g. due to the settlement of the outstanding amount or where the Group has transferred substantially all the risks and rewards associated with that contract. Other receivables are stated at invoice value less an allowance for ECLs. Trade and other receivables are subsequently measured at amortised cost as the business model is to collect contractual cash ows and the debt meets the Solely Payment of Principal and Interest (SPPI) criterion.
The Group recognises an allowance for ECLs for customer and other receivables. IFRS 9 'Financial instruments' requires a provision to be recognised on origination of a customer advance, based on its ECL.
The Directors have taken the simplication available under IFRS 9 5.5.15 which allows the loss amount in relation to a trade receivable to be measured at initial recognition and throughout its life at an amount equal to lifetime ECL. This simplication is permitted where there is either no signicant nancing component (such as customer receivables where the customer is expected to repay the balance in full prior to interest accruing) or where there is a signicant nancing component (such as where the customer expects to repay only the minimum amount each month), but the Directors make an accounting policy
STRATEGIC REPORT
| GOVERNANCE REPORT |
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
choice to adopt the simplication. Adoption of this approach means that Signicant Increase in Credit Risk (SICR) and Date of Initial Recognition (DOIR) concepts are not applicable to the Group's ECL calculations.
Lifetime ECLs are the ECLs that result from all possible default events over the expected life of a nancial instrument. Trade and other receivables are only written off when the Group has exhausted all options to recover the amounts due and provided for in full when there is no reasonable expectation of recovery, which is the Group's denition of default.
The assessment of credit risk and the estimation of ECL are required to be unbiased, probability-weighted and should incorporate all available information relevant to the assessment, including information about past events, current conditions and reasonable and supportable forecasts of economic conditions at the reporting date. The forward-looking aspect of IFRS 9 requires considerable judgement as to how changes in economic factors affect ECLs.
ECL charges in respect of customer receivables are recognised in the Consolidated Income Statement within cost of sales.
Inventories are stated at the lower of cost and net realisable value. Cost includes all costs incurred in bringing each product to its present location and condition. Raw materials, consumables and goods for resale are recognised on an average cost basis. Net realisable value is the estimated selling price in the ordinary course of business, less applicable variable selling expenses.
In the Consolidated Balance Sheet, cash and cash equivalents includes cash in hand, cash in transit, deposits held at call with banks and other short-term highly liquid investments with original maturities of three months or less. Cash in transit largely comprises amounts receivable on credit cards where the transaction has been authorised but the funds have yet to clear the bank. These balances are considered to be highly liquid, with minimal risk of default, and are typically received in less than three days.
Provisions are recognised when:
Provisions are not recognised for future operating losses.
Where there are a number of similar obligations, the likelihood that an outow will be required in settlement is determined by considering the class of obligations as a whole. A provision is recognised even if the likelihood of an outow with respect to any one item included in the same class of obligations may be small.
Provisions are measured at the present value of the expenditures expected to be required to settle the obligation using a pre-tax rate that reects current market assessments of the time value of money and the risks specic to the obligation. The increase in the provision due to passage of time is recognised as an interest expense.
The Group operates various post-employment schemes, including both dened benet schemes and dened contribution pension plans. Typically, dened benet schemes dene an amount of pension benet that an employee will receive on retirement, usually dependent on one or more factors such as age, years of service and compensation.
The amount recognised in the Consolidated Balance Sheet in respect of the dened benet pension scheme is the present value of the dened benet obligation at the end of the reporting period less the fair value of scheme assets. The dened benet obligation is calculated by a full yield-curve independent actuarial valuation. The present value of the dened benet amount is determined by discounting the estimated future cash outows using interest rates of high-quality corporate bonds that are denominated in the currency in which the benets will be paid, and that have terms to maturity approximating to the terms of the related pension obligation.
The current service cost of the dened benet scheme, recognised in the Consolidated Income Statement in employee benet expense, reects the increase in the dened benet obligation resulting from employee service in the current period, benet changes, curtailments and settlements. Past-service costs are recognised immediately in the Consolidated Income Statement.
The net interest cost is calculated by applying the discount rate to the net balance of the dened benet obligation and the fair value of scheme assets. This cost is included in employee benet expense in the Consolidated Income Statement.
Actuarial gains and losses arising from experience adjustments and changes in actuarial assumptions are charged or credited in other comprehensive income in the period in which they arise. Where the Group has an unconditional right to a refund, it recognises an asset measured as the amount of the surplus at the balance sheet date that is has a right to receive as a refund.
For dened contribution plans, the Group pays contributions to publicly or privately administered pension insurance plans on a mandatory, contractual or voluntary basis. The Group has no further payment obligations once the contributions have been paid. The contributions are recognised as an employee benet expense when they are due.
A nancial instrument is any contract that gives rise to a nancial asset in one entity and a nancial liability or equity instrument in another entity.
The Group does not hold any derivative instruments in either the current or prior period.
Financial assets are classied at initial recognition, and subsequently measured at amortised cost, Fair Value through Other Comprehensive Income (FVOCI) or Fair Value through Prot or Loss (FVPL). The classication is based on two criteria:
A summary of the Group's nancial assets is as follows:
| Financial assets | Classification under IFRS 9 |
|---|---|
| Trade and other receivables (excluding prepayments) |
Amortised cost – held to collect as business model and SPPI met |
| Cash and short-term deposits | Amortised cost |
Under IFRS 9 the Group initially measures a nancial asset at its fair value plus directly attributable transaction costs, unless the asset is classied as FVPL. Transactional costs of nancial assets carried at FVPL are expensed in the Consolidated Income Statement.
Financial assets at amortised cost are subsequently measured at amortised cost using the effective interest rate (EIR) method. The amortised cost is reduced by impairment losses. Interest income, impairment or gain or loss on derecognition are recognised in prot or loss.
A nancial asset is derecognised primarily when:
The Group recognises an allowance for ECLs for all debt instruments not held at FVPL. The most signicant nancial assets of the Group are its trade receivables. ECLs are calculated in accordance with the accounting policies set out above.
The Group has classied its nancial liabilities as follows:
| Financial liabilities | Classification under IFRS 9 |
|---|---|
| Interest-bearing loans and borrowings |
Amortised cost |
| Trade and other payables (excluding accrued income) |
Amortised cost |
All nancial liabilities are recognised initially at fair value and, in the case of loans and borrowings and payables, net of directly attributable transaction costs.
A summary of the subsequent measurement of nancial liabilities is set out below:
| Financial liabilities at FVPL | Subsequently measured at fair value. Gains and losses are recognised in the Consolidated Income Statement |
|---|---|
| Interest-bearing loans and borrowings |
Subsequently measured at amortised cost using the EIR method. The EIR amortisation is included in nance costs in the Income Statement |
| Trade and other payables (excluding accrued income) |
Subsequently measured at amortised cost |
A nancial liability is derecognised when the obligation under the liability is discharged, cancelled or expires. When an existing nancial liability is replaced by another from the same lender on substantially different terms, or the terms of an existing liability are substantially modied, such an exchange or modication is treated as the derecognition of the original liability and the recognition of a new liability. The difference in the respective carrying amounts is recognised in the Consolidated Income Statement.
Financial assets and nancial liabilities are offset and the net amount is reported in the Balance Sheet if there is a currently enforceable legal right to offset the recognised amounts and there is an intention and ability to settle on a net basis, to realise the assets and settle the liabilities simultaneously.
The Group's lease portfolio is principally comprised of property leases in relation to Watches of Switzerland, Mappin & Webb, Goldsmiths, Mayors and Betteridge showrooms, mono-brand boutiques and Support Centres. The leases typically run for terms between ve and 20 years and may include break clauses or options to renew beyond the non-cancellable periods. The majority of the Group's lease payments are subject to market review, usually every ve years, with a number of leases having annual increases dependent on economic indices. Some lease agreements include rental payments which are contingent on the turnover of the property to which they relate. These payments are excluded from the calculation of the lease liabilities under IFRS 16 'Leases'.
The Group assesses whether a contract is or contains a lease based on the denition of a lease under IFRS 16. A contract is, or contains, a lease if the contract conveys a right to control the use of an identied asset for a period of time in exchange for consideration.
At inception or on reassessment of a contract that contains a lease component, the Group allocates the consideration in the contract to each lease and nonlease component on the basis of their relative standalone prices.
The Group recognises right-of-use assets and lease liabilities at the lease commencement date. The lease liabilities are initially measured at the present value of the lease payments that are not yet paid at the commencement date, less any incentives receivable, discounted using the determined incremental borrowing rate applicable to the lease.
Lease payments in the measurement of the lease liability comprise:
The Group discounts lease payments to their present value, using its Incremental Borrowing Rate (IBR) at the lease commencement date. IBR applied to each lease is determined by taking into account:
Lease liabilities are subsequently measured at amortised cost and are increased to reect interest on the lease liability (using the effective interest method) and decreased by the lease payments made.
Lease liabilities are remeasured when there is a change in future lease payments arising from a change in an index or market rental review, a change in the estimate of the amount expected to be payable under a residual value guarantee, or as appropriate, changes in the assessment of whether a renewal option is reasonably certain to be exercised or a break clause is reasonably certain to be exercised.
When the lease liability is remeasured, an equivalent adjustment is made to the right-of-use asset, unless its carrying amount is reduced to £nil, in which case any remaining amount is recognised in prot or loss.
The Group has applied judgement to determine the lease term for those lease contracts that include a renewal or break option. The assessment of whether the Group is reasonably certain to exercise a renewal option or reasonably certain not to exercise a break option signicantly impacts the value of lease liabilities and right-of-use assets recognised on the Balance Sheet and the Consolidated Income Statement.
Right-of-use assets are initially measured at cost, which is an amount equal to the corresponding lease liabilities adjusted for any lease payments made at or before the commencement date, dilapidation provisions required, less any lease incentives received. The Group has elected to apply the exemption for short- term leases (leases with a term of less than one year) and low-value assets under IFRS 16, as such not recognising a right-of-use asset and lease liability on the Balance Sheet, but recognising lease payments associated with those leases as an expense on a straight-line basis over the lease term.
Where the Group has an obligation for costs to restore the underlying asset to the condition required by the terms and conditions of the lease, a provision is recognised and measured under IAS 37 'Provisions, contingent liabilities and contingent assets'. The estimated costs are included in the related right-of-use asset. Initial direct costs (lease acquisition costs), incurred subsequently to the initial date of application, have been included within the right-of-use asset.
Right-of-use assets are subsequently measured at cost less any accumulated depreciation and impairment losses, adjusted for certain remeasurements of the lease liabilities. Depreciation is calculated on a straight-line basis over the expected useful economic life of a lease which is taken as the lease term.
The following amendment was adopted early by the Group in the prior year:
– Classication of Liabilities as Current or Non-current and Non-current Liabilities with Covenants – Amendments to IAS 1
This had no material impact on the Group.
The preparation of consolidated nancial information requires the Group to make estimates and assumptions that affect the application of policies and reported amounts. Estimates and judgements are continually evaluated and are based on historical experience and other factors, including expectations of future events that are reasonable under the circumstances. Actual results may differ from these estimates.
Estimates and underlying assumptions are reviewed by management on an ongoing basis, with revisions recognised in the period in which the estimates are revised and in any future period affected.
The areas involving signicant risk resulting in a material adjustment to the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities within the next nancial period are as follows:
Inventories are stated at the lower of cost and net realisable value, on a weighted average cost basis. Provisions are recognised where the net realisable value is assessed to be lower than cost. The calculation of this provision requires estimation of the eventual sales price and sell-through of goods to customers in the future. The inventory provision held at the year-end was £5.8 million (2024: £6.4 million). A 20% reduction in the sell-through of slow moving stock would impact the net realisable value by c.£ 4.0 million.
Property, plant and equipment and right-of-use assets are reviewed for impairment if events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount may not be recoverable. For the impairment test, the value-in-use method requires the Group to determine appropriate assumptions (which are sources of estimation uncertainty) in relation to the cash ow projections over the strategic plan period, the long-term growth rate to be applied beyond this period and the risk-adjusted pre-tax discount rate used to discount those cash ows. The key assumptions relate to sales growth rates and discount rates used to discount the cash ows. Climate risk and near-term environmental actions that the Group is taking have been considered in future cash ows used in the impairment review. This includes unavoidable future costs such as price increases, together with the cost of mitigating climate risks, and consideration of quantied climate-related risks on future cash ows. Showroom related property, plant and equipment and right-of-use assets are tested for impairment at a showroom by showroom level, including an allocation of overheads related to showroom operations. Sensitivity of the key assumptions in relation to impairment is included in note 12.
The following are the critical judgements, apart from those involving estimations, that the Directors have made in the process of applying the Group's accounting policies and that have the most signicant effect on the amounts recognised in the Consolidated Financial Statements:
The Directors exercise their judgement in the classication of certain items as exceptional and outside the Group's underlying results. The determination of whether an item should be separately disclosed as an exceptional item, non-underlying or non-trading requires judgement on its size, nature or expected infrequency, as well as whether it provides clarity on the Group's underlying trading performance. In exercising this judgement, the Directors take appropriate regard of IAS 1 'Presentation of nancial statements' as well as guidance from the Financial Reporting Council and the European Securities Market Authority on the reporting of exceptional items and APMs. The overall goal of the Directors is to present the Group's underlying performance without distortion from one-off or non-trading events regardless of whether they are favourable or unfavourable to the underlying result. Further details on exceptional items are provided in note 4.
IFRS 16 denes the lease term as the non-cancellable period of a lease together with the options to extend or terminate a lease, if the lessee were reasonably certain to exercise that option.
Where a lease includes the option for the Group to terminate the lease before the term end, the Group makes a judgement as to whether it is reasonably certain that the option will or will not be taken.
On entering into a lease, the Group assesses how reasonably certain it is to exercise these options. The default position is that the Group will determine that the lease term is to the end of the lease (i.e. will not include break-clauses or options to extend) unless there is clear evidence to the contrary.
The lease term of each lease is reassessed if there is specic evidence of a change in circumstance such as:
The discount rate used to calculate the lease liability is the rate implicit in the lease, if it can be readily determined, or the lessee's incremental borrowing rate if not. Management uses the rate implicit in the lease in relation to the Group's 'Other' leases and the lessee's incremental borrowing rate for all property leases.
Incremental borrowing rates are determined on entering a lease and depend on the term, country, currency and start date of the lease. The incremental borrowing rate used is calculated based on a series of inputs including:
As a result, reecting the breadth of the Group's lease portfolio, judgements on the lease terms and the international spread of the portfolio, there are a large number of discount rates applied to the leases within the range of 2.1% to 7.7%.
The key Group performance measures are Adjusted Earnings Before Interest, Tax, Depreciation and Amortisation (Adjusted EBITDA) and Adjusted Earnings Before Interest and Tax (Adjusted EBIT), both shown pre-exceptional items, as detailed below. The segment prot/loss is disclosed on a pre-IFRS 16 basis reecting how results are reported to the Chief Operating Decision Makers (CODMs) and how they are measured for the purposes of covenant testing. Both Adjusted EBITDA and Adjusted EBIT are APMs and these measures provide stakeholders with additional useful information to assess the year-on-year trading performance of the Group but should not be considered in isolation of statutory measures.
Adjusted EBITDA represents prot for the period before nance costs, nance income, taxation, depreciation, amortisation, and exceptional items presented in the Group's Consolidated Income Statement (consisting of exceptional cost of sales, exceptional administrative expenses and exceptional nance costs) on a pre-IFRS 16 basis. UK and Europe operating segments are aggregated into one reporting segment, which is reective of the management structure in place and meets the aggregation criteria of IFRS 8.
Wholesale revenue is reported separately to the CODM and the results are aggregated into the US reporting segment. This is reective of the management structure in place. As such, following the acquisition of Roberto Coin Inc. in the period, wholesale revenue has been reported separately. Roberto Coin Inc. forms part of the US segment below and further detail of revenue, prot before tax and assets held has been disclosed in note 25 to these accounts.
| 52 week period ended 27 April 2025 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| UK and Europe £m |
US £m |
Corporate £m |
Total £m |
|
| Retail revenue | 865.9 | 679.3 | – | 1,545.2 |
| Wholesale revenue | – | 110.8 | – | 110.8 |
| Eliminations | – | (4.5) | – | (4.5) |
| Revenue from external customers | 865.9 | 785.6 | – | 1,651.5 |
| Cost of sales | (553.9) | (499.0) | – | (1,052.9) |
| Net margin | 312.0 | 286.6 | – | 598.6 |
| Less: | ||||
| Showroom costs | (170.3) | (122.4) | – | (292.7) |
| Overheads | (44.0) | (58.6) | (3.9) | (106.5) |
| Showroom opening and closing costs | (1.6) | (5.3) | – | (6.9) |
| Share of loss of joint venture and associates | (0.2) | – | – | (0.2) |
| Adjusted EBITDA | 95.9 | 100.3 | (3.9) | 192.3 |
| Depreciation, amortisation, impairment and loss on disposal of assets | (25.9) | (15.2) | (1.5) | (42.6) |
| Segment pro t/(loss)* |
70.0 | 85.1 | (5.4) | 149.7 |
| Impact of IFRS 16 (excluding interest on leases) | 19.7 | |||
| Net nance costs | (35.8) | |||
| Exceptional cost of sales (note 4) | (2.0) | |||
| Exceptional impairment of assets (note 4) | (46.5) | |||
| Exceptional other administrative expenses (note 4) | (7.0) | |||
| Exceptional nance costs (note 4) | (2.2) | |||
| Pro t before taxation for the nancial period |
75.9 | |||
* Segment prot/(loss) is dened as being Earnings Before Interest, Tax, exceptional items and IFRS 16 adjustments (Adjusted EBIT).
| 52 week period ended 28 April 2024 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| UK and Europe £m |
US £m |
Corporate £m |
Total £m |
|
| Revenue from external customers | 846.1 | 691.8 | – | 1,537.9 |
| Cost of sales | (538.8) | (436.9) | – | (975.7) |
| Net margin | 307.3 | 254.9 | – | 562.2 |
| Less: | ||||
| Showroom costs | (162.6) | (126.5) | – | (289.1) |
| Overheads | (50.2) | (32.8) | (2.3) | (85.3) |
| Showroom opening and closing costs | (5.6) | (3.3) | – | (8.9) |
| Adjusted EBITDA | 88.9 | 92.3 | (2.3) | 178.9 |
| Depreciation, amortisation, impairment and loss on disposal of assets | (27.6) | (15.2) | (1.4) | (44.2) |
| Segment pro t/(loss)* |
61.3 | 77.1 | (3.7) | 134.7 |
| Impact of IFRS 16 (excluding interest on leases) | 17.2 | |||
| Net nance costs | (26.6) | |||
| Exceptional cost of sales (note 4) | 0.5 | |||
| Exceptional impairment of assets (note 4) | (26.2) | |||
| Exceptional other administrative expenses (note 4) | (6.2) | |||
| Exceptional nance costs (note 4) | (1.3) | |||
| Pro t before taxation for the nancial period |
92.1 |
| 52 week period ended |
52 week period ended |
|
|---|---|---|
| 27 April 2025 | 28 April 2024 | |
| £m | £m | |
| UK AND EUROPE | ||
| Luxury watches | 729.5 | 709.4 |
| Luxury jewellery | 65.0 | 62.1 |
| Services/other | 71.4 | 74.6 |
| Total | 865.9 | 846.1 |
| US | ||
| Luxury watches | 624.0 | 635.3 |
| Luxury jewellery | 39.2 | 40.3 |
| Luxury jewellery wholesale | 110.8 | – |
| Eliminations | (4.5) | – |
| Services/other | 16.1 | 16.2 |
| Total | 785.6 | 691.8 |
| GROUP |
| Total | 1,651.5 | 1,537.9 |
|---|---|---|
| Services/other | 87.5 | 90.8 |
| Eliminations | (4.5) | – |
| Luxury jewellery wholesale | 110.8 | – |
| Luxury jewellery | 104.2 | 102.4 |
| Luxury watches | 1,353.5 | 1,344.7 |
'Services/other' consists of the sale of fashion and classic watches and jewellery, the sale of gifts, servicing, repairs and product insurance. Information regarding geographical areas, including revenue from external customers, is disclosed above.
No single customer accounted for more than 10% of revenue in any of the nancial periods noted above.
| 27 April 2025 £m |
28 April 2024 £m |
|
|---|---|---|
| UK AND EUROPE | ||
| Goodwill | 137.6 | 137.6 |
| Intangible assets | 5.5 | 5.1 |
| Property, plant and equipment | 100.7 | 115.7 |
| Right-of-use assets | 202.4 | 252.3 |
| Investment in joint venture and associates | 0.5 | – |
| Total | 446.7 | 510.7 |
| US | ||
| Goodwill | 93.6 | 61.7 |
| Intangible assets | 67.4 | 11.3 |
| Property, plant and equipment | 81.9 | 65.2 |
| Right-of-use assets | 151.2 | 124.3 |
| Total | 394.1 | 262.5 |
| CORPORATE | ||
| Property, plant and equipment | 9.8 | 10.5 |
| Right-of-use assets | 5.0 | 5.2 |
| Total | 14.8 | 15.7 |
| GROUP | ||
| Goodwill | 231.2 | 199.3 |
| Intangible assets | 72.9 | 16.4 |
| Property, plant and equipment | 192.4 | 191.4 |
| Right-of-use assets | 358.6 | 381.8 |
| Investment in joint venture and associates | 0.5 | – |
| Total | 855.6 | 788.9 |
The Group's disaggregated revenue recognised under contracts with customers relates to the following categories and operating segments:
| 52 week period ended 27 April 2025 | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sale of goods – retail and online £m |
Sale of goods – wholesale £m |
Eliminations £m |
Rendering of services* £m |
Total £m |
|
| UK and Europe | 839.4 | – | – | 26.5 | 865.9 |
| US | 666.3 | 110.8 | (4.5) | 13.0 | 785.6 |
| Total | 1,505.7 | 110.8 | (4.5) | 39.5 | 1,651.5 |
| 52 week period ended 28 April 2024 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sale of goods £m |
Rendering of services £m |
Total £m |
||
| UK and Europe | 810.6 | 35.5 | 846.1 | |
| US | 678.8 | 13.0 | 691.8 | |
| Total | 1,489.4 | 48.5 | 1,537.9 |
* The decrease in UK and Europe rendering of service revenue was due to the prior period including the gross amounts collected from the sale of insurance policies, compared to the disclosure for the 52-week period ended 27 April 2025 showing the net commission earned. The total revenue reported in the prior period was correct, and as the disclosure change is not material the prior year balances have not been restated.
Exceptional items are those that in the judgement of the Directors need to be separately disclosed by virtue of their size, nature or incidence, in order to draw the attention of the reader and to show the underlying business performance of the Group. Such items are included within the Income Statement caption to which they relate and are separately disclosed on the face of the Consolidated Income Statement.
| 52 week period ended 27 April 2025 £m |
52 week period ended 28 April 2024 £m |
|
|---|---|---|
| EXCEPTIONAL COST OF SALES | ||
| Acquisition costs | – | (0.7) |
| Rolex Old Bond Street (IFRS 16 depreciation)(i) (note 13) | (2.0) | (1.2) |
| Reversal of inventory provision created on acquisition | – | 2.4 |
| Total exceptional cost of sales | (2.0) | 0.5 |
| EXCEPTIONAL ADMINISTRATIVE COSTS | ||
| Showroom impairment(ii) | ||
| Impairment of right-of-use assets (note 13) | (24.6) | (13.0) |
| Impairment of property, plant and equipment (note 12) | (19.0) | (7.2) |
| Total exceptional items | (57.7) | (33.2) |
|---|---|---|
| Total exceptional nance costs |
(2.2) | (1.3) |
| Rolex Old Bond Street (IFRS 16 interest)(i) (note 13) | (2.2) | (1.3) |
| EXCEPTIONAL FINANCE COSTS | ||
| Total exceptional administrative costs | (53.5) | (32.4) |
| Integration costs of business acquisitions | (1.2) | – |
| Professional and legal expenses on actual and prospective business acquisitions | (0.9) | (2.6) |
| Business acquisitions(v) | ||
| Other costs | – | (2.6) |
| Impairment of property, plant and equipment (note 12) | (0.7) | (2.6) |
| Impairment of right-of-use assets (note 13) | – | (3.4) |
| European showroom impairment(iv) | ||
| Redundancy costs | (1.6) | – |
| Other onerous provisions | (1.8) | – |
| Disposal of property, plant and equipment (note 12) | (0.6) | – |
| Impairment of right-of-use assets (note 13) | (2.2) | – |
| Showroom closures(iii) | ||
| Lease surrender gain | 0.7 | – |
| Other onerous contracts | (1.6) | (1.0) |
A new 7,200 sq ft showroom was built and opened during the year in partnership with Rolex. This new agship is our largest Rolex showroom and reects the importance of the London market and the special relevance of London to the history of Rolex. The cost shown here is the IFRS 16 depreciation and interest costs incurred whilst the showroom was being constructed. They are deemed to be exceptional in nature given that this unique proposition results in a project size and complexity signicantly outside of a standard build, coupled with documented project delays outside of the Group's control. Costs shown are prior to the showroom opening on 14 March 2025.
The current macroeconomic environment, high interest rates and inationary landscape gave rise to indicators of impairment in the current period. Consequently, discounted cash ows were performed on all Cash Generating Units (CGUs) with indicators of impairment. This resulted in a non-cash impairment charge of £43.6 million being recorded in the period. This is allocated over the right-of-use assets and the property, plant and equipment of those showrooms as required by IAS 36 'Impairment of Assets'. A further provision of £1.6 million relates to associated onerous contracts. A lease surrender gain of £0.7 million was also recognised in exceptionals, as the original impairment was presented in exceptionals in the prior year.
In April 2025 the closure of a number of showrooms was announced as the Group continually assesses its operations to remain as efcient and productive as possible. The exceptional costs are reective of asset write downs, other onerous provisions and redundancy costs.
As announced during the prior year, the Group's intention has been to reallocate investment from Europe into the UK and US. During the year the Group has closed or transferred a further seven showrooms.
Professional and legal expenses on business combinations have been expensed to the Consolidated Income Statement as an exceptional cost as they are regarded as non-trading, non-underlying costs and are considered to be material by nature. Similarly, the costs associated with the integration of Roberto Coin Inc., and the Hodinkee business, have also been expensed as exceptional items.
The total cash outow in FY25 as a result of the above was £8.6 million, being (i) £3.3 million + (ii) £1.6 million + (iii) £1.2 million + (iv) £0.8 million + (v) £1.7 million.
All of these items are considered exceptional as they are linked to unique non-recurring events and do not form part of the underlying trading of the Group.
Group operating prot for continuing operations is stated after charging the below items:
| 52 week period ended |
52 week period ended |
|
|---|---|---|
| 27 April 2025 £m |
28 April 2024 £m |
|
| Depreciation of property, plant and equipment (note 12) | (40.8) | (39.7) |
| Amortisation of intangible assets (note 10) | (3.3) | (3.6) |
| Depreciation of right-of-use assets (note 13) | (54.5) | (54.8) |
| Depreciation of right-of-use assets – exceptional items (note 13) | (2.0) | (1.2) |
| Impairment of property, plant and equipment – exceptional items (note 12) | (19.7) | (9.8) |
| Impairment of right-of-use assets – exceptional items (note 13) | (26.8) | (16.4) |
| Inventory recognised as an expense | (1,064.4) | (981.6) |
| Write down of inventories to net realisable value | (1.6) | (2.4) |
| FEES PAYABLE TO THE GROUP'S EXTERNAL AUDITOR AND ITS ASSOCIATES IN RESPECT OF: | ||
| Audit of these Financial Statements | (0.8) | (0.6) |
| Audit of Financial Statements of subsidiaries | (0.1) | (0.1) |
| Audit related assurance services | (0.1) | (0.1) |
| (1.0) | (0.8) |
Staff costs for continuing operations recognised in operating prot for the Group during the period:
| 52 week period ended 27 April 2025 £m |
52 week period ended 28 April 2024 £m |
|
|---|---|---|
| Wages and salaries | 151.5 | 132.0 |
| Social security costs | 12.9 | 11.3 |
| Share-based payments (note 22) | 1.8 | 2.1 |
| Share-based payments social security costs | 0.2 | 0.3 |
| Pensions costs – dened contribution schemes (note 20) | 3.5 | 3.6 |
| Pensions costs – dened benet scheme (note 20) | 0.2 | 0.1 |
| Total | 170.1 | 149.4 |
Average number of people (including Executive Directors) employed:
| Total | 3,091 | 2,951 |
|---|---|---|
| Administrative | 693 | 667 |
| Editorial | 13 | – |
| Wholesale | 46 | – |
| Services | 146 | 149 |
| Retail | 2,193 | 2,135 |
| 52 week period ended 27 April 2025 |
52 week period ended 28 April 2024 |
|
Average Full Time Equivalents (FTE) (including Executive Directors) employed:
| 52 week period ended 27 April 2025 |
52 week period ended 28 April 2024 |
|
|---|---|---|
| Retail | 2,041 | 1,982 |
| Services | 140 | 142 |
| Wholesale | 45 | – |
| Editorial | 13 | – |
| Administrative | 668 | 645 |
| Total | 2,907 | 2,769 |
Further disclosure of the amounts paid to key management personnel is included within note 24.
| 52 week period ended 27 April 2025 £m |
52 week period ended 28 April 2024 £m |
|
|---|---|---|
| FINANCE COSTS | ||
| Interest payable on long-term borrowings | (14.9) | (7.9) |
| Amortisation of capitalised transaction costs | (0.9) | (0.5) |
| Interest on lease liabilities (note 13) | (22.2) | (20.8) |
| Net foreign exchange expense on nancing activities | (0.1) | (0.3) |
| Total nance costs |
(38.1) | (29.5) |
| FINANCE INCOME | ||
| Bank interest receivable | 2.2 | 2.9 |
| Other interest income | 0.1 | – |
| Total nance income |
2.3 | 2.9 |
| Total net nance costs excluding exceptional items |
(35.8) | (26.6) |
| Exceptional nance costs (note 4) | (2.2) | (1.3) |
| Total net nance costs |
(38.0) | (27.9) |
Further detail of borrowing facilities in place is given in note 19 to these Consolidated Financial Statements.
The tax charge for the period is shown below. Tax is made up of current and deferred tax. Current tax is the amount payable on the taxable income in the period and any adjustments to tax payable in previous periods.
| 52 week period ended 27 April 2025 £m |
52 week period ended 28 April 2024 £m |
|
|---|---|---|
| CURRENT TAX: | ||
| Current UK tax on prots for the period | 9.5 | 8.7 |
| Current US tax on prots for the period | 16.5 | 16.9 |
| Adjustments in respect of prior periods | 1.0 | 1.2 |
| Total current tax | 27.0 | 26.8 |
| DEFERRED TAX: | ||
| Origination and reversal of temporary differences | (3.8) | 5.2 |
| Impact of change in tax rate | – | 0.1 |
| Adjustments in respect of prior periods | (1.1) | 0.9 |
| Total deferred tax | (4.9) | 6.2 |
| Tax expense reported in the Consolidated Income Statement | 22.1 | 33.0 |
The tax rate for the current period was higher than the standard rate of corporation tax in the UK due to the following factors:
| 52 week period ended 27 April 2025 £m |
52 week period ended 28 April 2024 £m |
|
|---|---|---|
| Prot before taxation | 75.9 | 92.1 |
| Notional taxation at standard UK corporation tax rate of 25.0% (2024: 25.0%) | 19.0 | 23.0 |
| Non-deductible expenses – recurring | 2.0 | 2.5 |
| Non-deductible expenses – exceptional items | 0.2 | 1.9 |
| Overseas tax differentials | 0.8 | 1.9 |
| Deferred tax not recognised – European subsidiaries | 0.2 | 1.5 |
| Adjustments in respect of prior periods | (0.1) | 2.1 |
| Adjustments due to deferred tax rate change | – | 0.1 |
| Tax expense reported in the Consolidated Income Statement | 22.1 | 33.0 |
In addition to the amount charged to the Consolidated Income Statement, tax movements recognised in other comprehensive income were as follows:
| 52 week period ended 27 April 2025 £m |
52 week period ended 28 April 2024 £m |
|
|---|---|---|
| CURRENT TAX: | ||
| Foreign exchange difference on translation of foreign operations | 1.1 | (0.1) |
| DEFERRED TAX: | ||
| Pension benet obligation | – | 0.2 |
| Tax charge in other comprehensive income | 1.1 | 0.1 |
Deferred tax is the tax expected to be payable or recoverable in the future arising from temporary differences that arise when the carrying value of assets and liabilities differs between accounting and tax treatments. Deferred tax assets represent the amounts of income taxes recoverable in the future in respect of those differences, while deferred tax liabilities represent the amounts of income taxes payable in the future in respect of those differences.
The deferred tax is made up of:
| 27 April 2025 £m |
28 April 2024 £m |
|
|---|---|---|
| Deferred tax assets | 4.1 | 0.4 |
| Deferred tax liabilities | (15.9) | (3.4) |
| Total | (11.8) | (3.0) |
For full breakdown see note below:
| 27 April 2025 £m |
28 April 2024 £m |
||
|---|---|---|---|
| Accelerated capital allowances | (i) | (12.3) | (15.4) |
| Non-trade tax losses | (ii) | 0.8 | 1.2 |
| Trade tax losses | (iii) | 1.7 | 2.0 |
| Deferred tax on leases (IFRS 16) | (iv) | 8.2 | 7.0 |
| Share-based payments | (v) | 0.2 | 1.5 |
| Intangible xed assets | (vi) | (4.8) | (4.1) |
| Other temporary differences | (vii) | 8.3 | 3.7 |
| Deferred tax on business combinations | (viii) | (13.9) | 1.1 |
| Total | (11.8) | (3.0) |
The material amounts are explained below:
The net deferred tax asset in the UK of £4.1 million is disclosed separately on the balance sheet from the net deferred tax liability in the US of £15.9 million. The UK net deferred tax asset largely relates to a £6.6 million deferred tax asset on leases, a £0.8 million deferred tax asset on tax losses and a £0.4 million deferred tax asset on share-based payments, net of deferred tax liabilities on xed asset differences (£3.7 million).
The deferred tax movement in the period is as follows:
| 52 week period | 52 week period | |
|---|---|---|
| ended 27 April 2025 |
ended 28 April 2024 |
|
| £m | £m | |
| Balance at 29 April 2024 | (3.0) | 3.2 |
| RECOGNISED IN THE INCOME STATEMENT: | ||
| Accelerated capital allowances | 2.0 | (5.6) |
| Pension benet obligations | (0.2) | (0.2) |
| Movement on unused tax losses | (0.7) | (0.7) |
| Deferred tax on leases (IFRS 16) | 1.2 | 1.5 |
| Share-based payments | (1.3) | (1.3) |
| Intangible xed assets | (0.7) | (1.6) |
| Other temporary differences | 4.6 | 1.7 |
| RECOGNISED IN OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME: | ||
| Pension benet obligations | – | 0.2 |
| Foreign exchange movements | 0.2 | (0.1) |
| RECOGNISED DIRECTLY WITHIN EQUITY: | ||
| Share-based payments | 0.4 | (1.1) |
| Vested share-based payments | (0.4) | (0.1) |
| RECOGNISED DIRECTLY WITHIN GOODWILL: | ||
| Deferred tax on business combination | (13.9) | 1.1 |
| Balance at 27 April 2025 | (11.8) | (3.0) |
Non-trade losses available in future years have no expiry date and have been fully recognised. They will be fully utilised against future non-trade prots as and when they arise. In addition to the deferred tax items above, the Group has additional unrecognised gross non-trading tax losses of £4.2 million (2024: £4.2 million). These are unrecognised as it is uncertain as to whether the losses will be capable of utilisation. There is no expiry date applicable to the use of these losses. No deferred tax asset has been recognised in respect of trading losses in the European countries on the basis that they are unlikely to be utilised.
Pillar Two legislation has been enacted or substantively enacted in certain jurisdictions in which the Group operates. This legislation is effective for the period ended 27 April 2025, and subsequent periods. The Group has performed an assessment of the Group's potential exposure to Pillar Two income taxes based on the nancial performance of the constituent entities in the Group. Based on the assessment performed, the Pillar Two effective tax rates in all jurisdictions in which the Group operates are above 15%, or the results fall under a Pillar Two Safe Harbour. Management is not currently aware of any circumstances under which this might change for future periods and therefore the Group does not expect a potential exposure to Pillar Two top up taxes.
| 52 week period ended 27 April 2025 |
52 week period ended 28 April 2024 |
|
|---|---|---|
| BASIC | ||
| EPS | 22.8p | 25.0p |
| EPS adjusted for exceptional items | 40.8p | 36.8p |
| EPS adjusted for exceptional items and pre-IFRS 16 | 41.6p | 38.0p |
| DILUTED | ||
| EPS | 22.7p | 24.8p |
| EPS adjusted for exceptional items | 40.8p | 36.6p |
| EPS adjusted for exceptional items and pre-IFRS 16 | 41.5p | 37.7p |
Basic EPS is based on the prot for the year attributable to the equity holders of the Parent Company divided by the weighted average number of shares.
Diluted EPS is calculated by adjusting the weighted average number of shares used for the calculation of basic EPS as increased by the dilutive effect of potential ordinary shares.
The following table reects the prot and share data used in the basic and diluted EPS calculations:
| 52 week period ended 27 April 2025 £m |
52 week period ended 28 April 2024 £m |
|
|---|---|---|
| Prot after tax attributable to equity holders of the Parent Company | 53.8 | 59.1 |
| ADJUST FOR EXCEPTIONAL ITEMS: | ||
| Exceptional items (note 4) | 57.7 | 33.2 |
| Tax on exceptional items | (15.0) | (5.2) |
| Pro t adjusted for exceptional items |
96.5 | 87.1 |
| Pre-exceptional IFRS 16 adjustments, net of tax | 1.8 | 2.8 |
| Pro t adjusted for exceptional items and IFRS 16 |
98.3 | 89.9 |
The following table reects the share data used in the basic and diluted EPS calculations:
| WEIGHTED AVERAGE NUMBER OF SHARES: | 52 week period ended 27 April 2025 '000 |
52 week period ended 28 April 2024 '000 |
|---|---|---|
| Weighted average number of ordinary shares in issue | 236,518 | 236,753 |
| Weighted average shares for basic EPS | 236,518 | 236,753 |
| Weighted average dilutive potential shares | 224 | 1,446 |
| Weighted average shares for diluted EPS | 236,742 | 238,199 |
The weighted average number of shares takes into account the weighted average effect of changes in own shares during the period. Following the year-end, the £25.0 million share buyback programme was completed with the payment and cancellation of 3,465,947 shares for a cash consideration of £13.7 million. Following the cancellation there are 233,301,622 ordinary shares in issue.
| 27 April 2025 | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Goodwill £m |
Brands £m |
Agency agreement £m |
Licences with indenite useful life £m |
Computer software £m |
Total £m |
|
| COST | ||||||
| At 29 April 2024 | 199.3 | 14.1 | 2.8 | – | 15.6 | 231.8 |
| Acquired on business acquisition (note 25) | 37.5 | 3.4 | – | 57.2 | – | 98.1 |
| Additions | – | – | – | – | 3.6 | 3.6 |
| Disposals | – | – | – | – | (2.6) | (2.6) |
| Foreign exchange differences | (5.6) | (0.9) | (0.2) | (3.5) | (0.1) | (10.3) |
| At 27 April 2025 | 231.2 | 16.6 | 2.6 | 53.7 | 16.5 | 320.6 |
| ACCUMULATED AMORTISATION AND IMPAIRMENT | ||||||
| At 29 April 2024 | – | 4.1 | 1.8 | – | 10.2 | 16.1 |
| Charge for the period | – | 0.8 | 0.3 | – | 2.2 | 3.3 |
| Disposals | – | – | – | – | (2.4) | (2.4) |
| Foreign exchange differences | – | (0.3) | (0.1) | – | (0.1) | (0.5) |
| At 27 April 2025 | – | 4.6 | 2.0 | – | 9.9 | 16.5 |
| NET BOOK VALUE | ||||||
| At 27 April 2025 | 231.2 | 12.0 | 0.6 | 53.7 | 6.6 | 304.1 |
| At 28 April 2024 | 199.3 | 10.0 | 1.0 | – | 5.4 | 215.7 |
| 28 April 2024 | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Goodwill £m |
Brands £m |
Agency agreement £m |
Computer software £m |
Total £m |
|
| COST | |||||
| At 1 May 2023 | 182.8 | 14.0 | 2.8 | 13.2 | 212.8 |
| Acquired on business acquisition (note 25) | 16.0 | – | – | – | 16.0 |
| Additions | – | – | – | 2.4 | 2.4 |
| Foreign exchange differences | 0.5 | 0.1 | – | – | 0.6 |
| At 28 April 2024 | 199.3 | 14.1 | 2.8 | 15.6 | 231.8 |
| ACCUMULATED AMORTISATION AND IMPAIRMENT | |||||
| At 1 May 2023 | – | 3.5 | 1.6 | 7.3 | 12.4 |
| Charge for the period | – | 0.6 | 0.2 | 2.8 | 3.6 |
| Foreign exchange differences | – | – | – | 0.1 | 0.1 |
| At 28 April 2024 | – | 4.1 | 1.8 | 10.2 | 16.1 |
| NET BOOK VALUE | |||||
| At 28 April 2024 | 199.3 | 10.0 | 1.0 | 5.4 | 215.7 |
| At 30 April 2023 | 182.8 | 10.5 | 1.2 | 5.9 | 200.4 |
The Brands category is formed of intangible assets recognised on the business combinations of Mayors Jewelers, Analog:Shift, Betteridge, CENTO (acquired as part of the Roberto Coin Inc. business combination), and Hodinkee.
As at 27 April 2025, the Mayors Jewelers' brand had a remaining useful economic life of 23 (2024: 24) years, the Analog:Shift brand had a remaining useful economic life of nil (2024: one) year(s), the Betteridge brand had a remaining useful life of seven (2024: eight) years, the CENTO brand had a remaining useful economic life of four years, and the Hodinkee brand had a remaining useful economic life of nine years.
The Agency agreement category is solely formed of the intangible assets recognised on the business combination in relation to the showrooms within the Wynn Resort, Las Vegas, acquired in December 2017. As at 27 April 2025, the Agency agreements had a remaining useful economic life of 3 (2024: 4) years.
As noted within the accounting policies (note 1), goodwill is allocated between groups of CGUs for the purposes of impairment testing. CGUs are grouped due to sharing centralised functions and management, and this represents the smallest identiable group of assets that generate independent cash ows that are monitored by management and the CODMs.
Goodwill is monitored by management based on the categories set out below. Goodwill relating to the Heritage CGU consists of the Goldsmiths, Mappin & Webb and Watches of Switzerland businesses (included in the UK segment) which were purchased as part of the acquisition of Watches of Switzerland Group Limited (formerly Aurum Holdings Limited) in the period to 4 May 2014. Goodwill relating to the Watches of Switzerland (US) CGU consists of a number of US acquisitions which trade as Watches of Switzerland. The goodwill acquired as part of the Hodinkee business combination has been included in the Watches of Switzerland (US) goodwill number, as a large proportion of incremental revenue will be generated through the existing showroom network.
A summary of the groups of CGUs and allocation of goodwill held by the Group is presented below:
| 27 April 2025 £m |
28 April 2024 £m |
|
|---|---|---|
| Heritage (UK) | 137.6 | 137.6 |
| Watches of Switzerland (US) | 31.4 | 24.2 |
| Betteridge (US) | 20.9 | 22.1 |
| Mayors Jewelers (US) | 11.5 | 12.2 |
| The Wynn Resort, Las Vegas (US) | 2.9 | 3.0 |
| Analog:Shift (US) | 0.2 | 0.2 |
| Roberto Coin Inc. (US) | 26.7 | – |
| Total | 231.2 | 199.3 |
As at each period end, the recoverable amount of all groups of CGUs, owned for greater than 12 months, has been determined based on value-in-use calculations. Value-in-use calculations are underpinned by the Group's forecasts and strategic plans covering a three-year period, which have regard to historical performance and knowledge of the current market, together with management's view on the future achievable growth and committed initiatives. The cash ows which derive from the forecasts and strategic plans are pre-tax and include ongoing maintenance capital expenditure. Cash ows beyond the three-year period are extrapolated using the estimated long-term growth rates. Other than detailed strategic plans, the key assumptions for the value-in-use calculations are the long-term growth rates and the pre-tax discount rate, which takes into account the impact of IFRS 16 lease liabilities. The UK used a long-term growth rate of 2.0% (2024: 2.0%) and a pre-tax discount rate of 13.3% (2024: 13.0%), and the US used a long-term growth rate of 2.0% (2024: 2.0%) and a pre-tax discount rate of 13.1% (2024: 13.3%). Using these assumptions, no sales growth was required to support the asset values.
Whilst management believes the assumptions are realistic, it is possible that an impairment would be identied if any of the above key assumptions were changed signicantly. A sensitivity analysis has been performed on each of these key assumptions with other variables held constant. Given ongoing uncertainties in the global economy, management continues to use increased sensitivities. Despite this, management has concluded that there are no reasonably possible changes in any key assumptions that would cause the carrying amount of goodwill to exceed the value-in-use.
From November 2024, the Group held a 40% interest in Audemars Piguet (Manchester) Limited. The Group's interest in Audemars Piguet (Manchester) Limited is accounted for using the equity method in the Consolidated Financial Statements. Summarised nancial information, based on its nancial statements prepared in accordance with IFRS accounting standards, and reconciliation with the carrying amount of the investment in the Consolidated Financial Statements are set out below.
The showroom opened after the year-end in May 2025, and the results below reect pre-opening costs incurred.
| 27 April 2025 | 28 April 2024 | |
|---|---|---|
| £m | £m | |
| Current assets | 2.9 | – |
| Non-current assets | 5.3 | – |
| Current liabilities | (1.0) | – |
| Non-current liabilities | (6.0) | – |
| Equity | 1.2 | – |
| Group's share in equity – 40.0% | 0.5 | – |
| Group's carrying amount of the investment | 0.5 | – |
Summarised income statement of Audemars Piguet (Manchester) Limited
| 52 week period ended |
52 week period ended |
|
|---|---|---|
| 27 April 2025 £m |
28 April 2024 £m |
|
| Administrative expenses | (0.5) | – |
| Finance costs | (0.1) | – |
| Loss before taxation | (0.6) | – |
| Taxation | – | – |
| Loss for the nancial period |
(0.6) | – |
| Group's share of loss for the nancial period |
(0.2) | – |
| 27 April 2025 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Land and buildings £m |
Fittings and equipment £m |
Total £m |
||
| COST | ||||
| At 29 April 2024 | 2.2 | 342.4 | 344.6 | |
| Additions | – | 68.0 | 68.0 | |
| Acquired on business acquisition (note 25) | – | 1.0 | 1.0 | |
| Disposals | – | (18.2) | (18.2) | |
| Disposals – exceptional items (note 4) | – | (3.8) | (3.8) | |
| Foreign exchange differences | – | (7.3) | (7.3) | |
| At 27 April 2025 | 2.2 | 382.1 | 384.3 | |
| ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION | ||||
| At 29 April 2024 | 1.6 | 151.6 | 153.2 |
| At 27 April 2025 | 1.7 | 190.2 | 191.9 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Foreign exchange differences | – | (3.3) | (3.3) |
| Disposals – exceptional items (note 4) | – | (3.2) | (3.2) |
| Disposals | – | (15.3) | (15.3) |
| Impairment – exceptional items (note 4) | – | 19.7 | 19.7 |
| Charge for the period | 0.1 | 40.7 | 40.8 |
| NET BOOK VALUE | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| At 27 April 2025 | 0.5 | 191.9 | 192.4 |
| At 28 April 2024 | 0.6 | 190.8 | 191.4 |
| 28 April 2024 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Land and buildings £m |
Fittings and equipment £m |
Total £m |
||
| COST | ||||
| At 1 May 2023 | 2.5 | 264.4 | 266.9 | |
| Additions | 0.1 | 81.5 | 81.6 | |
| Acquired on business acquisition (note 25) | – | 5.8 | 5.8 | |
| Disposals | (0.4) | (9.7) | (10.1) | |
| Foreign exchange differences | – | 0.4 | 0.4 | |
| At 28 April 2024 | 2.2 | 342.4 | 344.6 |
| At 28 April 2024 | 1.6 | 151.6 | 153.2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Foreign exchange differences | – | 0.2 | 0.2 |
| Disposals | (0.3) | (8.7) | (9.0) |
| Impairment – exceptional items (note 4) | – | 9.8 | 9.8 |
| Charge for the period | 0.2 | 39.5 | 39.7 |
| At 1 May 2023 | 1.7 | 110.8 | 112.5 |
| ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION |
| NET BOOK VALUE | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| At 28 April 2024 | 0.6 | 190.8 | 191.4 |
| At 30 April 2023 | 0.8 | 153.6 | 154.4 |
Expenditure on assets in the course of construction at 27 April 2025 was £13.1 million (2024: £26.0 million). The cost of assets which continue to be used that have a £nil net book value (excluding impaired assets) total £48.8 million (2024: £41.2 million).
For impairment testing purposes, a CGU is dened as the smallest identiable group of assets that generate independent cash ows which are monitored by management and the CODMs. The Group considers this to be showroom locations or ofces. Each CGU is tested for impairment at the balance sheet date if any indicators of impairment have been identied.
The value-in-use of each CGU is calculated based on the Group's latest forecast cash ows, covering a three-year period, which have regard to historic performance and knowledge of the current market, together with the Group's views on the future achievable growth. Cash ows beyond this three-year period are extrapolated using a long-term growth rate based on management's future expectations, with reference to forecast GDP growth. These growth rates do not exceed the long-term growth rate for the Group's operations in the relevant territory. The recoverable amount of the two remaining European mono-brand boutiques is based on fair value less costs to sell. Revenues used for showroom impairment include revenues generated by those showrooms only, and no overlay is made for ecommerce sales.
The key assumptions in the value-in-use calculations are the growth rates of sales and gross prot margins, long-term growth rates and the risk-adjusted pre-tax discount rates. Pre-tax discount rates are derived from the Group's weighted average cost of capital, which has been calculated using the capital asset pricing model, the inputs of which include a country risk-free rate, equity risk premium and a risk adjustment (beta). The pre-tax discount rates are 13.3% in the UK and 13.1% in the US. Pre-tax discount rates are used to discount pre-tax cash ows. The post-tax discount rates, calculated in the same manner as the pre-tax discount rates, are 10.5% in the UK and 10.4% in the US.
During the period, the Group recognised an exceptional impairment charge of £26.8 million relating to right-of-use assets, and £19.7 million relating to property, plant and equipment. The Group reviewed the protability of its showroom network, taking into account the potential future impact on customer demand and increased costs. At 27 April 2025, following the impairment having been booked, all showroom asset values are supported by their value-in-use recoverable amount.
As disclosed in the accounting policies (note 1), the cash ows used within the impairment model are based on assumptions which are sources of estimation uncertainty and movements in these assumptions could lead to further impairments. Management has performed sensitivity analysis on the key assumptions in the impairment model using reasonably possible changes in these key assumptions across the showroom portfolio.
Reducing the expected FY26 sales by 5.0% and modelling this lower performance through the outer periods, would result in an increased impairment charge of £5.4 million. A 2.0% increase in the discount rate would increase the impairment charge by £1.5 million. In combination, a 5.0% sales reduction and a 2.0% increase in discount rate would increase the impairment charge by £6.5 million. This analysis does not assume any improvement in macroeconomic conditions or interest rates. Reasonably possible changes of the other assumptions would have no further signicant impact on the impairment charge.
Right-of-use assets have been grouped into two groups being Properties and Other. Properties are dened as land and buildings leased for our showrooms and ofces which are generally leased for between ve and ten years with some ofce buildings leased for longer. Other leases are mainly motor vehicles which are in general leased for four years. There are several lease contracts that include extension and termination options and variable lease payments. Management assesses the lease term at inception based on facts and circumstances applicable to each property including the period over which the investment appraisal was initially considered.
Management reviews the retail lease portfolio on an ongoing basis, taking into account retail performance and future trading expectations. In certain instances, management may exercise break options, negotiate lease reductions or decide not to negotiate a lease extension at the end of the lease term. The most signicant factor impacting future lease payments is the changes management chooses to make to the showroom portfolio.
A number of the retail property leases incur payments based on a percentage of revenue achieved at the location. Changes in future variable lease payments will typically reect changes in the Group's retail revenues. In line with IFRS 16, variable lease payments which are not linked to an index are not included in the lease liability.
The Group also has certain leases with lease terms of 12 months or less and leases of ofce equipment with low-value. The Group applies the 'short-term lease' and 'lease of low-value assets' recognition exemptions for these leases.
Set out below are the carrying amounts of right-of-use assets recognised and the movements during the period:
| Properties | Other | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|
| £m | £m | £m | |
| At 29 April 2024 | 380.6 | 1.2 | 381.8 |
| Additions | 75.4 | 0.1 | 75.5 |
| Acquired on business acquisition (note 25) | 1.9 | – | 1.9 |
| Lease surrenders and breaks | (15.4) | – | (15.4) |
| Impairment – exceptional items (note 4) | (26.8) | – | (26.8) |
| Depreciation | (54.0) | (0.5) | (54.5) |
| Depreciation – exceptional items (note 4) | (2.0) | – | (2.0) |
| Leases renewed during the period | 6.4 | – | 6.4 |
| Lease modications and expansions | 1.1 | – | 1.1 |
| Foreign exchange differences | (9.4) | – | (9.4) |
| At 27 April 2025 | 357.8 | 0.8 | 358.6 |
| Properties | Other | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|
| £m | £m | £m | |
| At 1 May 2023 | 358.0 | 1.1 | 359.1 |
| Additions | 88.3 | 0.6 | 88.9 |
| Acquired on business acquisition (note 25) | 14.5 | – | 14.5 |
| Lease surrenders and breaks | (15.4) | – | (15.4) |
| Impairment – exceptional items (note 4) | (16.4) | – | (16.4) |
| Depreciation | (54.3) | (0.5) | (54.8) |
| Depreciation – exceptional items (note 4) | (1.2) | – | (1.2) |
| Leases renewed during the period | 6.0 | – | 6.0 |
| Lease modications and expansions | 0.5 | – | 0.5 |
| Foreign exchange differences | 0.6 | – | 0.6 |
| At 28 April 2024 | 380.6 | 1.2 | 381.8 |
Set out below are the carrying amounts of lease liabilities and the movements during the period:
| Properties £m |
Other £m |
Total £m |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| At 29 April 2024 | (459.3) | (1.1) | (460.4) |
| Additions | (73.0) | (0.1) | (73.1) |
| Acquired on business acquisition (note 25) | (1.9) | – | (1.9) |
| Lease surrenders and breaks | 20.5 | – | 20.5 |
| Interest (note 7) | (22.2) | – | (22.2) |
| Interest – exceptional items (note 4) | (2.2) | – | (2.2) |
| Leases renewed during the period | (6.0) | – | (6.0) |
| Lease modications and expansions | (1.2) | 0.1 | (1.1) |
| Payments | 80.0 | 0.6 | 80.6 |
| Foreign exchange differences | 11.2 | – | 11.2 |
| At 27 April 2025 | (454.1) | (0.5) | (454.6) |
| Properties £m |
Other £m |
Total £m |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| At 1 May 2023 | (409.4) | (1.0) | (410.4) |
| Additions | (86.4) | (0.6) | (87.0) |
| Acquired on business acquisition (note 25) | (18.5) | – | (18.5) |
| Lease surrenders and breaks | 16.1 | – | 16.1 |
| Interest (note 7) | (20.8) | – | (20.8) |
| Interest – exceptional items (note 4) | (1.3) | – | (1.3) |
| Leases renewed during the period | (5.7) | – | (5.7) |
| Lease modications and expansions | (0.4) | – | (0.4) |
| Payments | 67.6 | 0.5 | 68.1 |
| Foreign exchange differences | (0.5) | – | (0.5) |
| At 28 April 2024 | (459.3) | (1.1) | (460.4) |
The following are the amounts recognised in the Consolidated Income Statement:
| 52 week period ended 27 April 2025 £m |
52 week period ended 28 April 2024 £m |
|
|---|---|---|
| Depreciation expense of right-of-use assets | (54.5) | (54.8) |
| Depreciation expense of right-of-use assets – exceptional items (note 4) | (2.0) | (1.2) |
| Interest expense on lease liabilities | (22.2) | (20.8) |
| Interest expense on lease liabilities – exceptional items (note 4) | (2.2) | (1.3) |
| Impairment of right-of-use assets – exceptional items (note 4) | (26.8) | (16.4) |
| Gain on lease modications and disposals | 5.5 | 0.8 |
| Expense relating to short-term leases (included within cost of sales) | (1.1) | (1.4) |
| Variable lease payments (included within cost of sales) | (5.0) | (6.8) |
| Total amount recognised in the Consolidated Income Statement | (108.3) | (101.9) |
Rental expense for contracts not in the scope of IFRS 16 totalled £3.7 million (2024: £3.6 million). Contracts not in the scope of IFRS 16 are contracts that were considered to be leases under IAS 17 which do not meet the denition under IFRS 16, principally because the supplier is considered to have substantive substitution rights over the associated assets.
Total cash ows in relation to leases, as dened in IFRS 16, in the 52-week period ended 27 April 2025 are £87.5 million (2024: £75.9 million). This relates to payments of £56.2 million (2024: £46.0 million) of lease principal, £24.4 million (2024: £22.1 million) of lease interest, £5.8 million (2024: £6.4 million) of variable lease payments and £1.1 million (2024: £1.4 million) of other lease payments principally relating to short-term leases and leases in which tenancy has continued after the lease term has ended.
The below table gives the undiscounted cash ows which relate to the leases recognised in line with IFRS 16. For leases which contain a break clause, the full liability to the end of the lease term is shown, unless highlighted in the narrative below.
| 27 April 2025 £m |
28 April 2024 £m |
|
|---|---|---|
| Within 1 year | 78.0 | 78.7 |
| Between 1 and 2 years | 76.5 | 77.9 |
| Between 2 and 3 years | 73.4 | 74.7 |
| Between 3 and 4 years | 70.9 | 70.2 |
| Between 4 and 5 years | 65.7 | 64.4 |
| Total for the periods thereafter | 211.5 | 214.4 |
| Total | 576.0 | 580.3 |
As at 27 April 2025, 12 (2024: 13) leases have cash ows that exceed ten years. The value of undiscounted cash ows greater than ten years totals £28.0 million (2024: £22.3 million).
Some leases contain break clauses to provide operational exibility. In some instances, the Group has identied certain leases where it is reasonably likely that a break will be served and as such has reected this in the term of the lease. Potential future undiscounted lease payments not included in the reasonably certain lease term and hence not included in lease liabilities total £9.9 million (2024: £10.8 million).
Future increases or decreases in rentals linked to an index or rate, which is applicable to two properties, are not included in the lease liability until the change in cash ows take effect. Approximately 48.6% of leases (2024: 50.2%) will be subject to rent reviews in future periods with rental changes linked to rent reviews which typically occur on a ve-yearly basis. The Group is committed to payments totalling £31.0 million (2024: £33.1 million) in relation to leases that have been agreed but have not yet commenced and as such, do not form part of the lease liability balance and are not included within the maturity analysis above.
The Group has incurred an exceptional impairment charge of £26.8 million in the year in relation to right-of-use assets. Refer to note 12 for further disclosure relating to impairment of non-current assets including right-of-use assets.
| 27 April 2025 | 28 April 2024 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current £m |
Non-current £m |
Current £m |
Non-current £m |
||
| Trade receivables | 32.4 | – | 10.1 | – | |
| Other receivables | 15.4 | 4.5 | 5.7 | 2.1 | |
| Allowance for expected credit losses | (0.9) | – | (0.5) | – | |
| 46.9 | 4.5 | 15.3 | 2.1 | ||
| Prepayments | 9.1 | – | 7.2 | – | |
| Total | 56.0 | 4.5 | 22.5 | 2.1 |
Included within trade receivables are amounts receivable from third-parties which provide credit arrangements with our customers. The increased trade receivables in the year is as a result of the inclusion of Roberto Coin Inc. balances. Other receivables includes supplier incentives, and in the current year also includes £8.8 million held in escrow in relation to business combinations (note 25). Prepayments relate mainly to prepaid property rates and service charges, and insurance and software prepayments. There are no material differences between the fair values and book values stated above.
Movements on the allowance for expected credit losses (ECLs) for impairment of trade and other receivables are as follows:
| 27 April 2025 £m |
28 April 2024 £m |
|
|---|---|---|
| Opening balance | 0.5 | 0.3 |
| (Decrease)/increase in allowance – cost of sales | (0.1) | 0.2 |
| Receivables written off during the period as uncollectable | (0.1) | – |
| Acquired on business combination | 0.6 | – |
| Balance at period end | 0.9 | 0.5 |
| 27 April 2025 £m |
28 April 2024 £m |
|
|---|---|---|
| Finished goods | 439.0 | 389.2 |
| Work in progress | 8.4 | 4.1 |
| Inventories | 447.4 | 393.3 |
| 27 April 2025 £m |
28 April 2024 £m |
|
|---|---|---|
| Cash at bank and in hand | 80.4 | 93.8 |
| Cash in transit | 18.5 | 21.9 |
| Cash and cash equivalents | 98.9 | 115.7 |
Included in cash and cash equivalents is restricted cash of £19.2 million (2024: £16.4 million). Restricted cash is dened as cash controlled by the Group but which is not freely useable by the Group in day-to-day operations.
| 27 April 2025 | 28 April 2024 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current £m |
Non-current £m |
Current £m |
Non-current £m |
||
| Trade payables | (114.1) | – | (123.7) | – | |
| Other taxation and social security | (19.5) | – | (16.1) | – | |
| Accruals and deferred income | (121.3) | (4.6) | (75.6) | (1.1) | |
| Total | (254.9) | (4.6) | (215.4) | (1.1) |
Trade payables do not bear interest and are generally settled within 30 to 60 days. Accruals and deferred income do not bear interest.
The increase in accruals and deferred income in the year is as a result of the inclusion of Roberto Coin Inc. balances, including £7.9 million of contingent consideration and £8.8 million held in escrow (see note 25 for further detail).
| 27 April 2025 | 28 April 2024 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current £m |
Non-current £m |
Current £m |
Non-current £m |
|
| Dilapidations | (1.9) | (8.3) | (1.4) | (8.1) |
| Onerous | (0.5) | (2.0) | (0.5) | (0.6) |
| Total | (2.4) | (10.3) | (1.9) | (8.7) |
| Utilised | 1.2 | 0.6 |
|---|---|---|
| Increase in provision | (1.9) | (2.3) |
| Opening balance | (9.5) | (7.8) |
| £m | £m | |
| ended 27 April 2025 |
ended 28 April 2024 |
|
| 52 week period | 52 week period |
The dilapidations provision comprises obligations for showroom or ofce remediation costs to be incurred in compliance with applicable legal and environmental regulations together with constructive obligations stemming from established practice once the property leases have expired. The key estimates associated with calculating the provision relate to the cost of repair or replacement to perform the necessary remediation work as at the reporting date together with determining the year of retirement. Estimates are updated annually based on the total estimated remaining life of leases.
| 52 week period ended 27 April 2025 |
52 week period ended 28 April 2024 |
|
|---|---|---|
| £m | £m | |
| Opening balance | (1.1) | – |
| Charged to Income Statement | (1.6) | (1.3) |
| Utilised | 0.2 | 0.2 |
| Balance at period end | (2.5) | (1.1) |
A provision is recognised for certain contracts with suppliers for which the unavoidable costs of meeting the obligations exceed the economic benets expected to be received.
| 27 April 2025 £m |
28 April 2024 £m |
|
|---|---|---|
| NON-CURRENT | ||
| Term loan | (93.9) | – |
| Multicurrency revolving loan facility | (101.2) | (115.0) |
| Associated capitalised transaction costs | 2.3 | 1.7 |
| Total borrowings | (192.8) | (113.3) |
| 29 April 2024 | Cash ow | Non-cash changes1 | Foreign exchange | 27 April 2025 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| £m | £m | £m | £m | £m | |
| Cash and cash equivalents | 115.7 | (15.4) | – | (1.4) | 98.9 |
| Term loan | – | (99.5) | – | 5.6 | (93.9) |
| Multicurrency revolving loan facility | (115.0) | 13.8 | – | – | (101.2) |
| Net cash/(debt) excluding capitalised transaction costs (pre-IFRS 16) | 0.7 | (101.1) | – | 4.2 | (96.2) |
| Capitalised transaction costs | 1.7 | 1.5 | (0.9) | – | 2.3 |
| Net cash/(debt) (pre-IFRS 16) | 2.4 | (99.6) | (0.9) | 4.2 | (93.9) |
| Lease liabilities | (460.4) | 80.6 | (86.0) | 11.2 | (454.6) |
| Total net debt | (458.0) | (19.0) | (86.9) | 15.4 | (548.5) |
1 Non-cash charges are principally a release of capitalised nance costs and lease liability interest charges, additions and revisions.
On 13 December 2024, the Group renanced and repaid its \$115.0 million term loan facility which was originally taken out to nance the Roberto Coin Inc. acquisition with a new £150.0 million facility, being made up of a £100.0 million term loan and £50.0 million multicurrency revolving credit facility. The £100.0 million was drawn down on 13 December 2024 as USD \$125.0 million and no further drawdown on the £100.0 million is permitted. The new facilities run coterminously with the existing UK bank facility of £225.0 million.
The key covenant tests attached to all Group facilities are a measure of net debt to EBITDA, and the Fixed Charge Cover Ratio (FCCR) at each April and October. The facility covenants are on a pre-IFRS 16 basis and exclude share-based payment costs. Net debt to EBITDA is dened as the ratio of total net debt at the reporting date to the last 12 month Adjusted EBITDA. This ratio must not exceed 3. The FCCR is the ratio of Adjusted EBITDA plus rent to the total nance charge and rent for the 12 months to the reporting date. The covenant tests at October 2024 and April 2025 were comfortably met.
The Group operates two (2024: two) separate UK dened contribution pension schemes. A dened contribution scheme called the Watches of Switzerland Company Limited Pension Scheme which is a Group Personal Pension (GPP) scheme, and a second scheme also called the Watches of Switzerland Company Limited Pension Scheme which is a dened contribution multi-employer occupational pension scheme. The Group operates one (2024: two) US dened contribution pension scheme, called The Mayors Jewelers Inc. Scheme.
During the period to 27 April 2025, the pension charge for the period represents contributions payable by the Group to these schemes and amounted to £3.5 million (2024: £3.6 million). The Group has no legal or constructive obligation to pay further contributions to the fund once the contributions have been paid. Members' benets are determined by the amount of contributions paid by the Group and the member, together with investment returns earned on the contributions arising from the performance of each individual's chosen investments and the type of pension the member chooses to buy at retirement. As a result, actuarial risk (that benets will be lower than expected) and investment risk (that assets invested in will not perform in line with expectations) fall on the employee. The assets of the schemes are held separately from the assets of the Group in trustee administered funds.
The Group operates a dened benet scheme, the Aurum Retirement Benets Scheme. The pension scheme operates under the regulatory framework of The Occupational Pension Schemes Regulations 1996. This is an approved funded pension scheme. Dened benet arrangements entitle employees to retirement benets based on their nal salary and length of service at the time of leaving the scheme, payable on attainment of retirement ages (or earlier death). The assets of the scheme are held separately from the assets of the Group in trustee administered funds. Contributions to the scheme are assessed in accordance with the advice of a qualied independent actuary. As a result of the valuation at 5 April 2023, contributions of £0.7 million per annum are being paid to the scheme until 5 April 2029, however, this will be reassessed upon the next triennial valuation in 2026. The Group is expecting to make total contributions of approximately £0.7 million in the 53-week period ended 3 May 2026.
By operating its dened benet pension scheme, the Group is exposed to the risk that the cost of meeting its obligations is higher than anticipated. This could occur for several reasons, for example:
The scheme liabilities are calculated using a discount rate set with reference to corporate bond yields. If scheme assets underperform this yield, this will create a decit. The Group believes that due to the long-term nature of the scheme liabilities, a level of continuing equity investment is an appropriate element of the Group's long-term strategy to manage the scheme efciently.
A decrease in corporate bond yields will increase scheme liabilities, although that will be partially offset by an increase in the value of the scheme's bond holdings.
This scheme was closed on 28 February 2002 to new employees. There are nil (2024: nil) active employees within the scheme. The latest full actuarial valuation was carried out at 5 April 2023 and was updated for IAS 19 'Employee benets' purposes to 27 April 2025 by a qualied independent actuary.
The components of the net dened benet expense recognised in the Consolidated Income Statement are as follows:
| 52 week period ended |
52 week period ended |
|
|---|---|---|
| 27 April 2025 | 28 April 2024 | |
| £m | £m | |
| Administrative expenses | (0.2) | (0.1) |
| Charge within labour costs and operating pro t |
(0.2) | (0.1) |
| De ned bene t charge to the Consolidated Income Statement |
(0.2) | (0.1) |
| Dened contribution schemes | (3.5) | (3.6) |
| Total charge to the Consolidated Income Statement | (3.7) | (3.7) |
The components of the net dened benet expense recognised in other comprehensive income are as follows:
| 52 week period | 52 week period | |
|---|---|---|
| ended 27 April 2025 £m |
ended 28 April 2024 £m |
|
| Actuarial gains due to liability nancial assumption changes | 1.0 | 0.4 |
| Experience adjustment | – | (0.5) |
| Loss on scheme assets greater than discount rate | (0.7) | (1.0) |
| Actuarial (losses)/gains due to demographic changes | (0.2) | 0.2 |
| Actuarial gain/(loss) recognised in other comprehensive income | 0.1 | (0.9) |
The net dened benet pension amount recognised in the Consolidated Balance Sheet is analysed as follows:
| 27 April 2025 | 28 April 2024 | |
|---|---|---|
| £m | £m | |
| Diversied growth funds | – | 9.6 |
| Bonds | 13.1 | – |
| Liability Driven Investment (LDI) | – | 3.4 |
| Cash | – | 0.2 |
| Fair value of scheme assets | 13.1 | 13.2 |
| Present value of benet obligations | (12.6) | (13.4) |
| Net pension asset/(liability) | 0.5 | (0.2) |
Changes in the present value of dened benet pension obligations are analysed as follows:
| 52 week period ended 27 April 2025 |
52 week period ended 28 April 2024 |
|
|---|---|---|
| £m | £m | |
| Opening dened benet obligation | (13.4) | (13.7) |
| Interest cost | (0.6) | (0.6) |
| Actuarial gains on dened benet obligation | 0.8 | 0.1 |
| Benets paid | 0.6 | 0.8 |
| Closing de ned bene t obligation |
(12.6) | (13.4) |
Changes in the fair value of scheme assets were as follows:
| 52 week period ended 27 April 2025 £m |
52 week period ended 28 April 2024 £m |
|
|---|---|---|
| Opening scheme assets | 13.2 | 13.8 |
| Expected return on scheme assets | 0.7 | 0.6 |
| Actuarial losses on pension scheme assets | (0.7) | (1.0) |
| Employer contributions | 0.7 | 0.7 |
| Benets paid | (0.6) | (0.8) |
| Administrative expenses | (0.2) | (0.1) |
| Closing scheme assets | 13.1 | 13.2 |
None of the pension arrangements directly invest in any of the Group's own nancial instruments nor any property occupied by, or other assets used by, the Group. During the period, Schroders remain appointed as the Scheme investment manager with a mandate to invest 30% of the Scheme's assets in Liability Driven Investment (LDI) and 70% invested in a diversied growth fund. The LDI allocation is around three times leveraged and therefore targets around 100% interest rate and ination hedging of the Scheme's liabilities.
During the year the Trustees and the Company agreed to implement a new bond-based investment strategy that consists of high-quality credit assets and removes the exposure to leveraged LDI. The trade was completed on 20 May 2024 and Schroders remain appointed as the Scheme investment manager but with a revised mandate to invest 60% in gilts, 25% in buy and maintain credit and 15% in secured nance. The investment strategy continues to hedge the Scheme's funded interest rates and ination risks associated with the liabilities measured on a gilt ats basis.
The IAS 19 (accounting) valuation of the dened benet obligation was undertaken by an external qualied actuary as at 27 April 2025 using the projected unit credit method. The principal actuarial assumptions used in the valuation were as follows:
| 27 April 2025 | 28 April 2024 | |
|---|---|---|
| Discount rate | 5.55% | 5.10% |
| Rate of future ination – RPI | 3.15% | 3.45% |
| Rate of future ination – CPI | 2.55% | 2.85% |
| Rate of increase in pensions in payment | 2.95% | 3.20% |
| Proportion of employees opting for a cash commutation | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| 27 April 2025 | 28 April 2024 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pensioner aged 65 | Non-pensioner aged 45 |
Pensioner aged 65 | Non-pensioner aged 45 |
|
| Life expectancy at age 65 (years): | ||||
| Male | 21 | 22 | 21 | 22 |
| Female | 24 | 25 | 24 | 25 |
The post-retirement mortality assumptions allow for expected increases to life expectancy. The life expectancies quoted for members currently aged 45 assume that they retire at age 65 (i.e. 20 years after the balance sheet date). The base mortality assumptions are in line with the standard S3PA year of birth tables. Future improvement trends have been allowed for in line with the CMI 2023 (2024: CMI 2023) series with a long-term trend towards 1.0% (2024: 1.0%) per annum.
The discount rate in the current and prior year has been derived using a full yield curve approach. The yield curve is based on iBoxx AA rated GBP Corporate Bond index and considers expected scheme cash ows at each duration. The expected average duration of the scheme's liabilities is 12 years.
The rate of retail price ination (RPI) has been derived in a consistent way to the discount rate, so that it is appropriate to the term of the liabilities. The RPI assumption for the scheme allows for the ination risk premium of 0.2% per annum (2024: 0.2% per annum).
The rate of consumer price ination (CPI) is set at 0.6% lower (2024: 0.6% lower) than the assumption for retail price ination, reecting the long-term expected gap between the two indices.
The impact on the dened benet obligation to changes in the nancial and demographic assumptions is shown below:
| 27 April 2025 £m |
28 April 2024 £m |
|
|---|---|---|
| 0.25% increase in discount rate | 0.3 | 0.4 |
| 0.25% decrease in discount rate | (0.3) | (0.4) |
| 0.25% increase in pension growth rate | (0.3) | (0.2) |
| 0.25% decrease in pension growth rate | 0.3 | 0.2 |
| 1 year increase in life expectancy | (0.4) | (0.4) |
| 1 year decrease in life expectancy | 0.4 | 0.4 |
On 16 June 2023, the High Court issued a ruling in respect of Virgin Media v NTL Pension Trustees II Limited (and others) calling into question the validity of rule amendments made between 6 April 1997 and 5 April 2016 to dened benet pension schemes contracted-out on a salary-related basis. Relevant amendments to benets within these pension schemes over this time required written conrmation from the Scheme Actuary that the 'Reference Scheme Test' would continue to be met. In the absence of such a conrmation, the Rule amendment would be void.
This decision was conrmed by the Court of Appeal in 2024, however the Government announced on 5 June 2025 that legislation would be introduced to give affected pension schemes the ability to retrospectively obtain written actuarial conrmation that historic benet changes met the necessary standards. This effectively means that provided schemes did in fact continue to meet the 'Reference Scheme Test' following any rule amendments, obtaining a retrospective actuarial conrmation where necessary will resolve this issue entirely.
The Aurum Retirement Benets Scheme includes benets arising from having been contracted-out on a salary-related basis and we have identied ve relevant amendments over the time period in question. The Company has not yet reviewed these with its legal adviser, however in the majority of the important cases it is clear that the relevant documentation is in order as the S37 certication is present. Furthermore, given that retrospective actuarial conrmation would now be permitted if necessary, there is no cause to believe that the legal ruling will have any impact on the Scheme, and by extension on the pensions disclosures required for accounting purposes.
| Nominal value £ |
Shares No. |
Share capital £m |
Share premium £m |
Merger reserve £m |
Other reserves £m |
Retained earnings £m |
Foreign exchange reserve £m |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.0125 | 239,570,297 | 3.0 | 147.1 | (2.2) | (23.4) | 394.1 | 4.4 |
| – | – | – | – | – | – | 53.9 | (14.1) |
| – | – | – | – | – | (12.1) | – | – |
| – | (2,802,728) | – | – | – | 11.3 | (11.3) | – |
| – | – | – | – | – | – | (12.9) | – |
| – | – | – | – | – | – | 1.8 | – |
| – | – | – | – | – | 10.9 | (10.9) | – |
| – | – | – | – | – | – | 0.4 | – |
| – | – | – | – | – | – | (0.4) | – |
| 0.0125 | 236,767,569 | 3.0 | 147.1 | (2.2) | (13.3) | 414.7 | (9.7) |
236,767,569 ordinary shares of £0.0125 nominal value. At the year-end date, 229,726 shares had been purchased by the Group as part of the share buyback programme, which were subsequently cancelled after the year-end date to give a holding of 236,537,843 ordinary shares in issue.
This reserve represents the amount of proceeds received for shares in excess of their nominal value of £0.0125 per share.
This reserve arose as a consequence of a Group reorganisation which inserted the Company as the Parent Company of the Group.
The capital redemption reserve relates to the repurchase and cancellation of shares of the Company. During the year, the aggregate nominal value of shares cancelled and transferred to the capital redemption reserve was £35,034 (2024: £nil).
Other reserves represent own shares purchased by the Group. During the period, the Group purchased £12.1 million of own shares for cancellation as part of the announced £25.0 million share buyback programme. At the year-end date, £11.3 million of these shares had been paid, cancelled and transferred to retained earnings, with the remaining £0.8 million being paid and cancelled on 28 and 29 April 2025.
In the prior period the Group purchased £7.2 million of shares to satisfy employee share incentive schemes. Shares are held by an Employee Benet Trust. The Group adopts a 'look-through' approach which, in substance, accounts for the Trust as an extension of the Group. Own shares are recorded at cost. At the year-end the Group held 1,889,509 (2024: 3,119,758) own shares.
This reserve represents the cumulative effect of foreign exchange differences in relation to the retranslation of the Group's subsidiaries which are denominated in a currency other than the Group's reporting currency of Pounds Sterling (£).
During the period to 27 April 2025, the Group operated four (2024: ve) separate share-based payment schemes. The Group has granted a number of different equity-based awards to employees which it has determined to be share-based payments as detailed below.
The LTIP is a discretionary executive share plan under which the Board may grant options over shares in Watches of Switzerland Group PLC, subject to Adjusted EPS and Return on Capital Employed (ROCE) performance conditions. The Group grants awards with one to three-year performance periods. Grants vest and become exercisable after the performance period and are awarded as nil-cost options. There are no cash settlement alternatives.
Details of the share options outstanding are as follows:
| Outstanding at 27 April 2025 | 1,703,490 | 2,093,838 |
|---|---|---|
| Forfeited/lapsed | (463,532) | (39,440) |
| Exercised | (1,198,711) | (284,703) |
| Granted | 1,271,895 | 551,319 |
| Outstanding at 29 April 2024 | 2,093,838 | 1,866,662 |
| 27 April 2025 | 28 April 2024 |
| Exercisable price | £nil | £nil |
|---|---|---|
| Exercisable at period end | 28,819 | 988,471 |
| Average fair value at grant | £4.87 | £5.08 |
The DBP is a discretionary bonus plan under which the Board may issue one-third of a bonus in the form of conditional share awards in Watches of Switzerland Group PLC. The annual bonus is linked to annual earnings targets. Two-thirds of the bonus is settled in cash. The remaining third of the bonus is deferred as share options and accounted for as an equity-settled share-based payment. These deferred shares are subject to a three-year vesting period with no additional performance conditions except for continued employment. Deferred shares are awarded as nil-cost options. Refer to the Remuneration Committee Report on pages 187 to 199 for further details of the scheme and changes made in the year.
Details of the share options outstanding are as follows:
| 27 April 2025 | 28 April 2024 | |
|---|---|---|
| Outstanding at 29 April 2024 | 372,886 | 378,607 |
| Granted* | 27,541 | – |
| Change in FY23 number of shares granted* | – | 9,440 |
| Exercised | (251,975) | (7,552) |
| Forfeited/lapsed | (1,894) | (7,609) |
| Outstanding at 27 April 2025 | 146,558 | 372,886 |
| Exercisable price | £nil | £nil |
| Exercisable at period end | 40,203 | 15,485 |
| Average fair value at grant | £6.92 | £8.02 |
|---|---|---|
| * The share price at which the number of shares granted under the DBP scheme is calculated is not conrmed until after the date of the approval of the Annual Report and Accounts. The maximum |
number of DBP shares granted during the period is therefore estimated using the year-end closing share price and trued up at the date of grant.
The Company operated two (2024: one) SAYE schemes for UK employees and one (2024: one) ESPP scheme for US employees in the year.
Options are granted at the prevailing market rate less a discount of 15%, being exercisable after three years (UK employees) and two years (US employees) from the date of grant. The scheme permits a maximum saving of £500 (or US equivalent at the time of invitation) per month out of taxed income. SAYE/ESPP options are accounted for as an equity-settled award under IFRS 2.
Details of the share options outstanding are as follows:
| 27 April 2025 | 28 April 2024 | |
|---|---|---|
| Outstanding at 29 April 2024 | 202,549 | 367,259 |
| Granted | 764,610 | – |
| Forfeited | (212,704) | (133,013) |
| Expired | – | (31,697) |
| Outstanding at 27 April 2025 | 754,455 | 202,549 |
| Exercisable price | £nil | £nil |
| Exercisable price | £nil | £nil |
|---|---|---|
| Exercisable at period end | nil | nil |
| Average fair value at grant | £3.99 | £10.80 |
During FY22 the Group issued 50 free shares to all colleagues who were employed by the Group on 15 December 2021. Employees were required to remain employed for a period of three years to earn the shares. The UK shares are administered through a Share Incentive Plan. The US shares are issued under the LTIP and subject to the Employee Benet Trust. The Trust results are consolidated by the Group. During the year, the required three-year employment period ended, giving employees the option to exercise shares earned.
Details of the share options outstanding are as follows:
| 27 April 2025 | 28 April 2024 | |
|---|---|---|
| Outstanding at 29 April 2024 | 73,450 | 92,700 |
| Exercised | (16,700) | – |
| Forfeited | (8,150) | (19,250) |
| Outstanding at 27 April 2025 | 48,600 | 73,450 |
| Exercisable price | £nil | £nil |
| Exercisable at period end | 48,600 | nil |
| Average fair value at grant | £12.66 | £12.66 |
Two buy-out share options were granted to the former CFO when joining the Group to replace those in place at his previous employment. The awards were translated into Group shares at the share price on the date of joining. These options were exercised and nalised in the prior year.
Details of the share option movements are as follows:
| 27 April 2025 | 28 April 2024 | |
|---|---|---|
| Outstanding at 29 April 2024 | – | 1,722 |
| Exercised | – | (1,722) |
| Lapsed | – | – |
| Outstanding at 27 April 2025 | – | – |
| Exercisable price | – | £nil |
| Exercisable at period end | – | nil |
| Average fair value at grant | – | £14.20 |
The amounts recognised in the Consolidated Income Statement within administrative expenses (excluding employer's national insurance) in relation to these schemes were as follows:
| 52 week period ended 27 April 2025 £m |
52 week period ended 28 April 2024 £m |
|
|---|---|---|
| LTIP | 0.4 | 0.5 |
| DBP | 0.7 | 0.8 |
| SAYE/ESPP | 0.5 | 0.6 |
| Free shares | 0.2 | 0.2 |
| 1.8 | 2.1 |
The fair value of equity-settled share options and share awards granted is estimated at the date of grant using share option valuation models. The schemes are valued using the Black-Scholes model.
The following tables list the inputs to the models for options and share-based payment costs during the year:
| LTIP | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 27 April 2025 | 28 Apr 2024 | 30 Apr 2023 | 1 May 2022 | 2 May 2021 | |
| Share price (£) | £4.14/£4.56 | £4.89/£6.70 | £7.51 | £9.42 | £3.20 |
| Exercise price (£) | nil | nil | nil | nil | nil |
| Dividend yield (%) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Risk-free interest rate (%) | 3.83% | 4.39% | 3.72% | 0.61% | 0.57% |
| Expected life of share option | 1-3 yrs | 3 yrs | 3 yrs | 3 yrs | 3 yrs |
| DBP | SAYE/ESPP | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 27 April 2025 | 30 Apr 2023 | 1 May 2022 | 2 May 2021 | 27 April 2025 | 1 May 2022 | |
| Share price (£) | £3.59 | £7.56 | £7.51 | £9.42 | £3.49 | £10.80 |
| Exercise price (£) | nil | nil | nil | nil | nil | nil |
| Dividend yield (%) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Risk-free interest rate (%) | 3.83% | 3.71% | 0.66% | 0.57% | 3.83% | 0.05% |
| Expected life of share option | 4 yrs | 4 yrs | 4 yrs | 4 yrs | UK 3 yrs US 2 yrs |
UK 3 yrs US 2 yrs |
The Group did not enter into any share-based payment transactions with parties other than employees during the current period.
| 27 April 2025 £m |
28 April 2024 £m |
|
|---|---|---|
| FINANCIAL ASSETS – HELD AT AMORTISED COST | ||
| Trade and other receivables* | 51.4 | 17.4 |
| Cash and cash equivalents | 98.9 | 115.7 |
| Total nancial assets |
150.3 | 133.1 |
| FINANCIAL LIABILITIES – HELD AT AMORTISED COST | ||
| Interest-bearing loans and borrowings: | ||
| Term loan (net of capitalised transaction costs) | (93.2) | – |
| Multicurrency revolving loan facility (net of capitalised transaction costs) | (99.6) | (113.3) |
| Multicurrency revolving loan facility interest payable | – | (1.4) |
| Trade and other payables** | (235.6) | (188.4) |
| (428.4) | (303.1) | |
| Lease liability (IFRS 16) | (454.6) | (460.4) |
| Total nancial liabilities |
(883.0) | (763.5) |
* Excludes prepayments of £9.1 million (2024: £7.2 million) that do not meet the denition of a nancial instrument.
** Trade payables exclude customer deposits of £4.3 million (2024: £6.0 million) and deferred income of £19.6 million (2024: £20.7 million) that do not meet the denition of a nancial instrument.
At 27 April 2025, the fair values of each category of the Group's nancial instruments are materially the same as their carrying values in the Group's Balance Sheet based on either their short maturity or, in respect of long-term borrowings, interest being incurred at a oating rate.
The Board of Directors has overall responsibility for the establishment and oversight of the Group's risk and capital management framework and for establishing the Group's risk management policies.
The Group has exposure to the following risks arising from nancial instruments:
No signicant changes were made in the objectives, policies and processes for managing capital during the years ended 27 April 2025 and 28 April 2024.
The Group has generated sufcient cash from operations to meet its working capital requirements. Cash ow forecasting is performed in the operating entities of the Group. The Group monitors rolling forecasts of the Group's liquidity requirements to ensure it has sufcient cash to meet operational needs while maintaining sufcient headroom on its undrawn committed borrowing facilities at all times so that the Group does not breach borrowing limits on any of its borrowing facilities.
The table below shows the maturity analysis of the undiscounted remaining contractual cash ows, including interest, of the Group's nancial liabilities:
| 27 April 2025 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Less than one year £m |
Between one and ve years £m |
Greater than ve years £m |
Total £m |
|
| Term loan | – | (93.2) | – | (93.2) |
| Multicurrency revolving loan facility | – | (99.6) | – | (99.6) |
| Trade and other payables | (231.0) | (4.6) | – | (235.6) |
| Lease liabilities (IFRS 16) | (78.0) | (286.5) | (211.5) | (576.0) |
| Total | (309.0) | (483.9) | (211.5) | (1,004.4) |
| 28 April 2024 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Less than one year £m |
Between one and ve years £m |
Greater than ve years £m |
Total £m |
|
| Multicurrency revolving loan facility | (1.4) | (113.3) | – | (114.7) |
| Trade and other payables | (188.4) | – | – | (188.4) |
| Lease liabilities (IFRS 16) | (78.7) | (287.2) | (214.4) | (580.3) |
| Total | (268.5) | (400.5) | (214.4) | (883.4) |
As at 27 April 2025, 12 (2024: 13) leases have cash ows that exceed ten years. The value of undiscounted cash ows greater than ten years totals £28.0 million (2024: £22.3 million).
Interest rate risk is the risk that the fair value or future cash ows of a nancial instrument will uctuate because of changes in market interest rates. The Group's exposure to the risk of changes in market interest rates relates primarily to the Group's debt obligations with oating interest rates.
The Group's policy is to maintain low levels of variable debt by managing the cash position of the business closely and ensuring that the debt position is minimised. The Group regularly renances in order to obtain better rates for both long-term debt and short-term debt obligations. The Group uses strong cash positions to pay down long-term and short-term debt when possible in order to reduce the overall debt position.
The following table demonstrates the sensitivity to a reasonably possible change in interest rates on that portion of loans and borrowings affected.
The analysis has been prepared using the assumptions that:
– For oating rate assets and liabilities, the amount of the asset or liability outstanding at the balance sheet date is assumed to have been outstanding for the whole period
– Fixed rate nancial instruments that are carried at amortised cost are not subject to interest rate risk for the purpose of this analysis. With all other variables held constant, the Group's prot before tax is affected through the impact on oating rate borrowings, as follows:
| 52 week period ended 27 April 2025 £m |
52 week period ended 28 April 2024 £m |
|
|---|---|---|
| Interest rate increase of 0.5% | (1.0) | (0.6) |
| Interest rate decrease of 0.5% | 1.0 | 0.6 |
Credit risk arises from cash and cash equivalents, credit sales and deposits with banks. Credit risk related to the use of treasury instruments is managed on a Group basis. This risk arises from transactions with banks, such as those involving cash and cash equivalents and deposits. To reduce the credit risk, the Group has concentrated its main activities with a group of banks that have secure credit ratings. For each bank, individual risk limits are set based on its nancial position, credit ratings, past experience and other factors. The utilisation of credit limits is regularly monitored.
Management continually review specic balances for potential indicators of impairment. In the instance where an indicator is identied, management will determine overall recovery from a legal perspective and provide for any irrecoverable amounts.
Credit risk also arises from the recoverability of the Group's trade and other receivables. Trade and other receivables are only written off when the Group has exhausted all options to recover the amounts due and provided for in full when there is no reasonable expectation of recovery, which is the Group's denition of default. Indicators that there is no reasonable expectation of recovery include, amongst others, the failure of the debtor to engage in a repayment plan with the Group and a failure to make contractual payments. An ECL provision is then calculated on the remaining trade and other receivables.
The ageing analysis of the trade receivables is as follows:
| 27 April 2025 £m |
28 April 2024 £m |
|
|---|---|---|
| Not past due | 22.8 | 9.3 |
| Less than one month past due | 3.9 | 0.2 |
| One to two months past due | 2.0 | 0.1 |
| More than two months past due | 3.7 | 0.5 |
| Total | 32.4 | 10.1 |
The maximum exposure to credit risk at the reporting date is the carrying value of each class of asset.
The exposure to currency risk is considered below:
| 27 April 2025 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sterling £m |
US Dollar £m |
Other £m |
Total £m |
|
| FINANCIAL ASSETS | ||||
| Trade and other receivables | 18.5 | 32.9 | – | 51.4 |
| Cash and cash equivalents | 61.1 | 37.4 | 0.4 | 98.9 |
| Total nancial assets |
79.6 | 70.3 | 0.4 | 150.3 |
| FINANCIAL LIABILITIES | ||||
| Term loan | 0.7 | (93.9) | – | (93.2) |
| Multicurrency revolving loan facility | (88.4) | (11.2) | – | (99.6) |
| Trade and other payables | (123.3) | (107.7) | (4.6) | (235.6) |
| Lease liabilities | (265.5) | (186.5) | (2.6) | (454.6) |
| Total nancial liabilities |
(476.5) | (399.3) | (7.2) | (883.0) |
| 28 April 2024 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sterling £m |
US Dollar £m |
Other £m |
Total £m |
|
| FINANCIAL ASSETS | ||||
| Trade and other receivables | 10.6 | 6.8 | – | 17.4 |
| Cash and cash equivalents | 77.3 | 37.4 | 1.0 | 115.7 |
| Total nancial assets |
87.9 | 44.2 | 1.0 | 133.1 |
| Total nancial liabilities |
(526.9) | (225.7) | (10.9) | (763.5) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lease liabilities | (299.7) | (152.9) | (7.8) | (460.4) |
| Trade and other payables | (113.9) | (72.8) | (3.1) | (189.8) |
| Multicurrency revolving loan facility | (113.3) | – | – | (113.3) |
The following table demonstrates the sensitivity to a change in the US Dollar exchange rate, with all other variables held constant, and the impact upon the Group's prot after tax assuming that none of the US Dollar exposures are used as hedging instruments. Sensitivities have not been performed for any other currencies as the Group has no signicant exposure in any other currency.
| Effect on prot | Effect on prot | |
|---|---|---|
| (Increase)/ | after tax 52 week | after tax 52 week |
| decrease | period ended | period ended |
| in rate | 27 April 2025 | 28 April 2024 |
| £m | £m | £m |
| US Dollar (5%) |
(1.9) | (2.3) |
| US Dollar 5% |
2.1 | 2.5 |
The capital structure of the Group consists of debt, as analysed in note 19, and equity attributable to the equity holders of the Parent Company, comprising issued capital reserves and retained earnings as shown in the Consolidated Statement of Changes in Equity. The Group manages its capital with the objective that all entities within the Group continue as going concerns while maintaining an efcient structure to minimise the cost of capital.
The Directors carefully monitor the Group's long-term borrowings including the ability to service debt and long-term forecast covenant compliance.
The Group takes a disciplined approach to capital allocation with the objective to deliver long-term sustainable earnings growth whilst retaining nancial capability to invest in developing our business and to execute our strategic priorities. The Group is well positioned to continue investing in elevating and expanding its existing showroom portfolio and to make complementary acquisitions which meet strict investment criteria and advance the Group's strategic objectives.
Total compensation of four (2024: two) key management personnel in the period to 27 April 2025 amounted to £2.1 million (2024: £1.5 million). Compensation includes salaries and other short-term employee benets, post-employment benets and other long-term benets. Key management are eligible to receive discounts on goods purchased from the Group's trading companies. Such discounts are in line with discounts offered to all staff employed by Group companies. In addition to their salaries, the Group also contributes to post-employment dened contribution plans unless individuals choose to waive these employer contributions.
Key management are those individuals who have authority and responsibility for planning, directing and controlling the activities of the Group. Figures reported for the 52 week period ended 27 April 2025 now also include President North America & Deputy CEO, and President UK & Europe to align with the latest Group operational structure in place.
| 52 week period | 52 week period | |
|---|---|---|
| ended | ended | |
| 27 April 2025 | 28 April 2024 | |
| £m | £m | |
| Short-term employment benets | 1.8 | 0.9 |
| Share-based payments | 0.3 | 0.6 |
| Total | 2.1 | 1.5 |
Transactions between the Company and its subsidiaries, which are related parties, have been eliminated on consolidation and are not disclosed in this note.
In November 2024, a loan of £2.4 million has been made to Audemars Piguet (Manchester) Limited in which the Group holds a 40% interest.
In April 2025, the Executive Directors exercised vested share-based payment awards. The grossed up taxable value of the shares was processed through the Group's payroll. Amounts owed to HMRC of £1.7 million were owing by Directors at 27 April 2025, and were settled in May 2025 as per the terms of the exercise agreement.
On 8 May 2024, the Group signed and completed the acquisition of the entire share capital of Roberto Coin Inc., an associate company of Roberto Coin S.p.A. from Roberto Coin S.p.A., Peter Webster, Co-Founder and President of Roberto Coin Inc., and Pilar Coin. The acquisition completed for a total cash consideration of £106.2 million, of which £7.9 million was deferred for one year and contingent on the future protability of the acquired business. This has been paid in full after the year-end. A nal net working capital true up payment of £2.1 million was paid after the 27 April 2025 year-end date.
Luxury branded jewellery is a core pillar of the Group's growth strategy and the acquisition will signicantly enhance our strategic positioning in the luxury branded jewellery market on a per capital basis. The business contributed revenue of £111.9 million and prot before tax of £23.5 million from the 8 May 2024 acquisition date to 27 April 2025.
The following table summarises the consideration paid for the acquisition net of £4.0 million of cash acquired, and the fair value of assets acquired at the acquisition date:
| £m | |
|---|---|
| Total cash consideration net of cash acquired | 106.2 |
| Assessment of values on acquisition | |
| Inventories | 53.9 |
| Trade and other receivables | 13.2 |
| Intangibles – licences with indenite useful life | 57.2 |
| Intangibles – brand | 0.5 |
| Property, plant and equipment | 1.0 |
| Trade and other payables | (32.3) |
| Provisions | (0.4) |
| Right-of-use asset | 1.9 |
| Lease liabilities | (1.9) |
| Deferred tax liability | (15.5) |
| Total identi able net assets |
77.6 |
| Goodwill | 28.6 |
| Total assets acquired | 106.2 |
At 27 April 2025 an amount of £8.2 million, from the initial consideration paid, was held with a third-party on retention and reported within debtors in these accounts. The full amount was paid in June 2025 after the year-end date.
The goodwill recognised is attributable to the protability of the acquired business and is deductible for tax purposes. Intangible assets have been recognised in relation to the licence with an indenite useful life and the brand name CENTO was acquired. The licence is non-amortising as the supply agreement with Roberto Coin S.p.A. extends into perpetuity. The CENTO brand has been assigned a ve-year life.
Wholesale non-current assets are contained within the US operating segment. At the year-end the values remain materially in line with the acquisition balances.
The Group measured the acquired lease liabilities using the present value of the remaining lease payments at the date of acquisition. The right-of-use assets were measured at an amount equal to the lease liabilities.
Given the proximity of the acquisition to the beginning of FY25, the Group's revenue and prot before tax had the acquisition been made on the rst day of the year would not be materially different to the result reported and therefore has not been disclosed separately.
Acquisition-related costs have been charged to exceptional items in the Consolidated Income Statement, as disclosed in note 4 to these Consolidated Financial Statements.
On 3 October 2024, the Group signed and completed the acquisition of the trade and assets of Hodinkee, Inc., a digital editorial content provider for luxury watch enthusiasts. As part of the transaction, the entire share capital of Hodinkee Insurance Holdings Inc. was acquired to retain the licence to sell insurance. The acquisition completed for a total cash consideration of £10.7 million. The acquisition allows the Group to leverage existing growth opportunities by growing sector leadership online, and also further enhances the Group's ability to capture market share, particularly in the fast growing US market.
The acquisition contributed revenue of £3.1 million from the 3 October 2024 acquisition date to 27 April 2025. The prot before tax contribution was not material to the Group result.
The following table summarises the consideration paid for the acquisition, and the provisional fair value of assets acquired at the acquisition date:
| £m |
|---|
| 10.7 |
| 0.2 |
| 0.1 |
| 2.9 |
| (1.4) |
| 1.8 |
| 8.9 |
| 10.7 |
An amount of £0.6 million, from the initial consideration paid, is held with a third-party on retention and is reported within debtors in these accounts. This will be paid by the Group within 12 months of the acquisition date.
The goodwill recognised is attributable to the protability of the acquired business and is deductible for tax purposes.
An intangible asset has been recognised in relation to the Hodinkee brand which has been assigned a ten-year life.
If the business combination had taken place at the beginning of FY25, the contribution to revenue would have been £6.1 million. The prot before tax is not material to the results of the Group and therefore has not been disclosed separately.
Acquisition-related costs have been charged to exceptional items in the Consolidated Income Statement, as disclosed in note 4 to these Consolidated Financial Statements.
On 17 November 2023, the Group acquired the trade and assets of 15 showrooms from retailers Ernest Jones Limited and Signet Trading Limited for a cash consideration of £44.2 million. The acquisition further advanced the Group's expansion strategy.
The following table summarises the consideration paid for the acquisition, and the fair value of assets acquired at the acquisition date:
| £m |
|---|
| 44.2 |
| 25.3 |
| 5.8 |
| 14.5 |
| (18.5) |
| 1.1 |
| 28.2 |
| Goodwill | 16.0 |
|---|---|
| Total assets acquired | 44.2 |
The goodwill recognised was attributable to the protability of the acquired showrooms and is deductible for tax purposes.
The Group measured the acquired lease liabilities using the present value of the remaining lease payments at the date of acquisition. The right-of-use assets were measured at an amount equal to the lease liabilities, with an adjustment required to reect the terms of the lease relative to market terms.
There are a number of contingent liabilities that arise in the normal course of business, which if realised, are not expected to result in a material liability to the Group.
Following the year-end, the £25.0 million share buyback programme was completed with the payment and cancellation of 3,465,947 shares for a cash consideration of £13.7 million. Following the cancellation there are 233,301,622 ordinary shares in issue.
No further post-balance sheet events have been identied.
| Note | 27 April 2025 £m |
28 April 2024 £m |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| FIXED ASSETS | |||
| Investments | C2 | 471.9 | 471.9 |
| CURRENT ASSETS | |||
| Debtors: amounts receivable within one year | C3 | 0.2 | 0.3 |
| CURRENT LIABILITIES | |||
| Creditors: amounts falling due within one year | C4 | (13.7) | – |
| Net current liabilities | (13.5) | 0.3 | |
| Net assets | 458.4 | 472.2 | |
| EQUITY | |||
| Share capital | C6 | 3.0 | 3.0 |
| Share premium | C6 | 147.1 | 147.1 |
| Other reserves | C6 | (13.3) | (23.4) |
| Retained earnings | 321.6 | 345.5 | |
| Total equity | 458.4 | 472.2 |
The Company's prot after tax was £9.4 million (2024: £4.4 million). The prot in year is a result of a dividend received which allowed repayment of management recharges from subsidiary entities, and enabled the purchase of shares.
The Financial Statements were approved and authorised for issue by the Board and were signed on its behalf by:
CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER Date: 2 July 2025
The notes on pages 264 to 269 form part of these Financial Statements.
Company number: 11838443
| Share capital £m |
Share premium £m |
Other reserves £m |
Retained earnings £m |
Total equity attributable to owners £m |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Balance at 30 April 2023 | 3.0 | 147.1 | (18.4) | 341.2 | 472.9 |
| Prot for the nancial period | – | – | – | 4.4 | 4.4 |
| Purchase of own shares | – | – | (7.2) | – | (7.2) |
| Share-based payments charge | – | – | – | 2.1 | 2.1 |
| Share-based payments exercised | – | – | 2.2 | (2.2) | – |
| Balance at 28 April 2024 | 3.0 | 147.1 | (23.4) | 345.5 | 472.2 |
| Prot for the nancial period | – | – | – | 9.4 | 9.4 |
| Purchase of own shares for cancellation | – | – | (12.1) | – | (12.1) |
| Own shares cancelled | – | – | 11.3 | (11.3) | – |
| Committed share buyback | – | – | – | (12.9) | (12.9) |
| Share-based payments charge | – | – | – | 1.8 | 1.8 |
| Share-based payments exercised | – | – | 10.9 | (10.9) | – |
| Balance at 27 April 2025 | 3.0 | 147.1 | (13.3) | 321.6 | 458.4 |
Watches of Switzerland Group PLC (the 'Company') is a public limited company, limited by shares, which is listed on the London Stock Exchange and incorporated and domiciled in England and Wales. The registered number is 11838443 and the address of the registered ofce is Aurum House, 2 Elland Road, Braunstone, Leicester, LE3 1TT.
These Financial Statements present information about the Company as an individual undertaking and not about its Group. The Financial Statements of Watches of Switzerland Group PLC have been prepared in compliance with United Kingdom Accounting Standards, including Financial Reporting Standard 102, 'The Financial Reporting Standard applicable in the United Kingdom and the Republic of Ireland' (FRS 102) and the Companies Act 2006. The Financial Statements are presented in Pounds Sterling (£), which is the Group's presentational currency, and are shown in £millions to one decimal place.
The accounting policies set out in the notes below have been applied in preparing the Financial Statements for the 52 week period ended 27 April 2025 and the comparative information presented in these Financial Statements for the 52 week period ended 28 April 2024.
The Company is included within the Consolidated Financial Statements of Watches of Switzerland Group PLC. The Consolidated Financial Statements of Watches of Switzerland Group PLC are prepared in accordance with IFRS and are publicly available. In these Financial Statements, the Company is considered to be a qualifying entity (for the purposes of this FRS) and has applied the exemptions available under FRS 102 in respect of the following disclosures:
As permitted by Section 408 of the Companies Act 2006, the Income Statement of the Company is not presented as part of the Financial Statements. The Company's accounting policies are the same as those set out in note 1 of the Consolidated Financial Statements, unless noted below.
Investments in subsidiaries are measured at cost less accumulated impairment. Where merger relief is applicable, the cost of the investment in a subsidiary undertaking is measured at the nominal value of the shares issued together with the fair value of any additional consideration paid.
The carrying values of non-nancial assets are reviewed at each balance sheet date to determine whether there is any indication of impairment. If any impairment loss arises, the asset is adjusted to its estimated recoverable amount and the difference is recognised in the Income Statement.
Trade and other debtors are recognised initially at transaction price plus attributable transaction costs. Trade and other creditors are recognised initially at transaction price less attributable transaction costs. Subsequent to initial recognition, they are measured at amortised cost using the effective interest method, less any impairment losses in the case of trade debtors. If the arrangement constitutes a nancing transaction, for example if payment is deferred beyond normal business terms, then it is measured at the present value of future payments discounted at a market rate of interest for a similar debt instrument.
Some employees (including senior executives) of the Group receive remuneration in the form of share-based payments, whereby employees render services as consideration for equity instruments (equity-settled transactions). The fair value of the equity-settled awards is calculated at grant date using a Black-Scholes model. The resulting cost is charged in the Income Statement over the vesting period of the option or award and is regularly reviewed and adjusted for the expected and actual number of options or awards vesting. This applies to LTIP Awards, Deferred Share Bonus Schemes, Save as You Earn and Employee Stock Purchase Plan Awards, and Free Share Awards.
Service and non-service performance conditions are not taken into account when determining the grant date fair value of awards, but the likelihood of the conditions being met is assessed as part of the Group's best estimate of the number of equity instruments that will ultimately vest. No expense is recognised for awards that do not ultimately vest because of non-market performance and/or service conditions that have not been met.
The social security contributions payable in connection with the grant of the share options is determined at each balance sheet date as a liability with the total cost recognised in the Income Statement over the vesting period.
Own shares represent the shares of Watches of Switzerland Group PLC that are held in an Employee Benet Trust which has been set up for this purpose. The Company adopts a 'look-through' approach which, in substance, accounts for the Trust as an extension of the Company. Own shares are recorded at cost and are deducted from equity.
The Company's nancial risk is managed as part of the Group's strategy and policies as discussed in note 23 of the Consolidated Financial Statements.
In accordance with the exemption allowed by Section 408(3) of the Companies Act 2006, the Company has not presented its own Income Statement or Statement of Comprehensive Income.
The Company has no employees other than the Directors, who did not receive any remuneration for their services directly from the Company in either the current or preceding period. Refer to note 24 in the Group Financial Statements for Key Management Personnel compensation.
The remuneration paid to the External Auditor in relation to the audit of the Company is disclosed in note 5 of the Consolidated Financial Statements. The fees for the audit of the Company's Financial Statements are borne by a subsidiary of the Company and are not recharged.
Our activities and interests are operated through subsidiaries, joint ventures and associates which are subject to the laws and regulations of many different jurisdictions. As at 27 April 2025:
| Entity | Principal activity | Country of | incorporation Registered office | Type of share held by the Group |
Proportion of ordinary shares held by Group companies |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jewel UK Midco Limited* | Intermediate holding company |
England and Wales |
Aurum House, 2 Elland Road, Braunstone, Leicester LE3 1TT |
Ordinary | 100% |
| Jewel UK Bidco Limited | Intermediate holding company |
England and Wales |
Aurum House, 2 Elland Road, Braunstone, Leicester LE3 1TT |
Ordinary | 100% |
| Watches of Switzerland Operations Limited |
Intermediate holding company |
England and Wales |
Aurum House, 2 Elland Road, Braunstone, Leicester LE3 1TT |
Ordinary | 100% |
| Aurum Acquisitions Limited | Intermediate holding company |
England and Wales |
Aurum House, 2 Elland Road, Braunstone, Leicester LE3 1TT |
Ordinary | 100% |
| Watches of Switzerland Company Limited |
Retailer | England and Wales |
Aurum House, 2 Elland Road, Braunstone, Leicester LE3 1TT |
Ordinary | 100% |
| Mappin & Webb Limited | Trading | England and Wales |
Aurum House, 2 Elland Road, Braunstone, Leicester LE3 1TT |
Ordinary | 100% |
| Goldsmiths Limited | Dormant | England and Wales |
Aurum House, 2 Elland Road, Braunstone, Leicester LE3 1TT |
Ordinary | 100% |
| WoS Dormant 1 Limited | Dormant | England and Wales |
Aurum House, 2 Elland Road, Braunstone, Leicester LE3 1TT |
Ordinary | 100% |
| WoS Dormant 2 Limited | Dormant | England and Wales |
Aurum House, 2 Elland Road, Braunstone, Leicester LE3 1TT |
Ordinary | 100% |
| Aurum Insurance (Guernsey) Limited** |
Captive insurance company |
Guernsey | Heritage Hall, Le Marchant Street, St Peter Port, Guernsey GY1 4JH |
Ordinary | 100% |
| Watches of Switzerland Limited | Dormant | England and Wales |
Aurum House, 2 Elland Road, Braunstone, Leicester LE3 1TT |
Ordinary & redeemable preference |
100% |
| Aurum Pension Trustees Limited | Pension trustee company |
England and Wales |
Aurum House, 2 Elland Road, Braunstone, Leicester LE3 1TT |
Ordinary | 100% |
| Audemars Piguet (Manchester) Limited |
Non-trading | England and Wales |
Audemars Piguet (Uk) Limited 82-84 Grosvenor Street, 1st Floor, London W1K 3JZ |
Ordinary | 40% |
| Watches of Switzerland Group USA Inc |
Holding company | USA | 3340 NW 53rd Street, Suite 402, Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33309 |
Ordinary | 100% |
| Watches of Switzerland (Nevada) LLC |
Retailer | USA | 3340 NW 53rd Street, Suite 402, Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33309 |
Ordinary | 100% |
| Watches of Switzerland (A/S) LLC | Retailer | USA | 3340 NW 53rd Street, Suite 402, Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33309 |
Ordinary | 100% |
| Watches of Switzerland LLC | Retailer | USA | 3340 NW 53rd Street, Suite 402, Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33309 |
Ordinary | 100% |
| Mayors Jewellers LLC | Retailer | USA | 3340 NW 53rd Street, Suite 402, Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33309 |
Ordinary | 100% |
| Roberto Coin Inc. | Wholesaler and Retailer |
USA | 579 5th Avenue, 17th Floor, New York 10017 | Ordinary | 100% |
| Hodinkee LLC | Holding | USA | 13450 W. Sunrise Blvd. Suite 500, Sunrise FL 33323 | Ordinary | 100% |
| RC Employee Services LLC | Non-trading | USA | 579 5th Avenue, 17th Floor, New York 10017 | Ordinary | 100% |
| RBC 100 LLC | Non-trading | USA | 579 5th Avenue, 17th Floor, New York 10017 |
Ordinary | 100% |
| Hodinkee Insurance Holding Inc. | Holding | USA | 255 Centre Street, 4th Floor, New York 10013 | Ordinary | 100% |
| Hodinkee Insurance Agency Inc. | Trading | USA | 255 Centre Street, 4th Floor, New York 10013 | Ordinary | 100% |
| Mayors Jewellers Florida LLC | Retailer | USA | 3340 NW 53rd Street, Suite 402, Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33309 |
Ordinary | 100% |
| WOSG (Ireland) Limited | Non-trading | Ireland | Suite 3, One Earlsfort Centre, Lower Ordinary Hatch Street, Dublin 2, D02 X288, Ireland |
100% | |
| Watches of Switzerland Group (Denmark) Aps |
Retailer | Denmark | Store Kongensgade 68, 1264 København K, Denmark |
Ordinary | 100% |
| Watches of Switzerland Group (Sweden) AB |
Non-trading | Sweden | AB Birger Jarlsgatan 14, Stockholm, 114 34, Sweden |
Ordinary | 100% |
| W123 BV | Non-trading | Netherlands | Herikerbergweg 88, 1101CM, Amsterdam, Netherlands Ordinary | 100% | |
| WOSG (Germany) GmbH | Non-trading | Germany | Maximiliansplatz 17, 80333, Munchen, Germany | Ordinary | 100% |
* Investment in Jewel UK Midco is directly held. All other investments are indirectly held.
** Results of this company are fully taxable in the UK as a controlled foreign company.
All subsidiary undertakings are included in the Consolidated Financial Statements. The proportion of the voting rights in the subsidiary undertakings held directly by the Company do not differ from the proportion of ordinary shares held.
Investment in subsidiaries at the period end was as follows:
| 27 April 2025 | 28 April 2024 | |
|---|---|---|
| £m | £m | |
| Investment in subsidiaries | 471.9 | 471.9 |
Investments in Company undertakings are recorded at cost, which is the fair value of the consideration paid.
| 27 April 2025 £m |
28 April 2024 £m |
|
|---|---|---|
| Amounts owed by Group undertakings | 0.2 | 0.3 |
Amounts owed by Group undertakings are unsecured and repayable on demand.
| 27 April 2025 £m |
28 April 2024 £m |
|
|---|---|---|
| Other creditors | (13.7) | – |
Other creditors represent £0.8 million of shares purchased as part of the share buyback programme which had not been settled at the year-end date, in addition to a further £12.9 million commitment to purchase shares after the balance sheet date.
| 27 April 2025 £m |
28 April 2024 £m |
|
|---|---|---|
| FINANCIAL ASSETS – HELD AT AMORTISED COST | ||
| Amounts owed by Group undertakings | 0.2 | 0.3 |
| FINANCIAL LIABILITIES – HELD AT AMORTISED COST | ||
| Other creditors | (13.7) | – |
| Nominal value £ |
Shares No. |
Share capital £m |
Share premium £m |
Other reserves £m |
Retained earnings £m |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| As at 29 April 2024 | 0.0125 | 239,570,297 | 3.0 | 147.1 | (23.4) | 345.5 |
| Prot for the nancial period | – | – | – | – | – | 9.4 |
| Purchase of own shares for cancellation | – | – | – | – | (12.1) | – |
| Own shares cancelled | – | (2,802,728) | – | – | 11.3 | (11.3) |
| Committed share buyback | – | – | – | – | – | (12.9) |
| Share-based payments charge | – | – | – | – | – | 1.8 |
| Share-based payments exercised | – | – | – | – | 10.9 | (10.9) |
| As at 27 April 2025 | 0.0125 | 236,767,569 | 3.0 | 147.1 | (13.3) | 321.6 |
236,767,569 ordinary shares of £0.0125 nominal value. At the year-end date, 229,726 shares had been purchased by the Group as part of the share buyback programme, which were subsequently cancelled after the year-end date to give a holding of 236,537,843 ordinary shares in issue.
This reserve represents the amount of proceeds received for shares in excess of their nominal value of £0.0125 per share.
The capital redemption reserve relates to the repurchase and cancellation of shares of the Company. During the nancial year, the aggregate nominal value of shares cancelled and transferred to the capital redemption reserve was £35,034 (2024: £nil).
Other reserves represent own shares purchased by the Company. During the period, the Company purchased £12.1 million of own shares for cancellation as part of the announced £25.0 million share buyback programme. At the year-end date, £11.3 million of these shares had been paid, cancelled and transferred to retained earnings, with the remaining £0.8 million being paid and cancelled on 28 and 29 April 2025.
In the prior period the Company purchased £7.2 million of shares to satisfy employee share incentive schemes. Shares are held by an Employee Benet Trust. The Group adopts a 'look-through' approach which, in substance, accounts for the Trust as an extension of the Company. Own shares are recorded at cost. At the year-end the Company held 1,889,509 (2024: 3,119,758) own shares.
The Company has taken advantage of the exemptions under FRS 102.33 'Related Party Transactions' for wholly owned subsidiaries not to disclose intragroup transactions.
Details of the Company's share-based payments are disclosed within note 22 in the Consolidated Financial Statements.
At the date of signing the accounts, the Company has provided cross guarantee arrangements to Barclays Bank PLC, BNP Paribas London Branch, Citibank N.A. London Branch, Fifth Third Bank National Association, HSBC UK Bank PLC, Lloyds Bank PLC, National Westminster Bank PLC, Northern Bank Limited Trading as Danske Bank and Crédit Industriel et Commercial London Branch in respect of the obligations of certain fellow subsidiary undertakings in relation to the Group's lending facilities.
Following the year-end, the £25.0 million share buyback programme was completed with the payment and cancellation of 3,465,947 shares for a cash consideration of £13.7 million. Following the cancellation there are 233,301,622 ordinary shares in issue.
No further post-balance sheet events have been identied.
The Directors use Alternative Performance Measures (APMs) as they believe these measures provide additional useful information on the underlying trends, performance and position of the Group. These measures are used for performance analysis. The APMs are not dened by IFRS and therefore may not be directly comparable with other companies' APMs. These measures are not intended to be a substitute for, or superior to, IFRS measures.
The majority of the Group's APMs are on a pre-IFRS 16 basis. This aligns with the management reporting used to inform business decisions, investment appraisals, incentive schemes and banking covenants.
Net margin less showroom costs.
4-Wall EBITDA is a direct measure of protability of the showroom operations.
| £million | FY25 | FY24 |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | 1,651.5 | 1,537.9 |
| Inventory recognised as an expense | (1,064.4) | (981.6) |
| Other inc. supplier incentives | 11.5 | 5.9 |
| Net margin | 598.6 | 562.2 |
| Showroom costs | (292.7) | (289.1) |
| 4-Wall EBITDA | 305.9 | 273.1 |
Showroom costs include rental costs on a pre-IFRS 16 basis (i.e. under IAS 17). Refer to the IFRS 16 reconciliations on page 273 for further details.
For each of these areas as dened above, the Group shows the measures as a percentage of Group revenue.
Protability as a percentage of Group revenue is shown to understand how effectively the Group is managing its cost base.
| £million | FY25 | FY24 |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | 1,651.5 | 1,537.9 |
| Net margin | 598.6 | 562.2 |
| 36.3% | 36.6% | |
| 4-Wall EBITDA | 305.9 | 273.1 |
| 18.5% | 17.8% | |
| EBITDA (Unadjusted) | 199.4 | 187.8 |
| 12.1% | 12.2% | |
| Adjusted EBITDA | 192.3 | 178.9 |
| 11.6% | 11.6% | |
| Adjusted EBIT (segmental prot) | 149.7 | 134.7 |
| 9.1% | 8.8% |
Measure of protability that excludes one-off exceptional costs and IFRS 16 adjustments to allow for comparability between years.
This measure was linked to management incentives in the nancial year.
Reconciled in note 2 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
EBITDA before exceptional items presented in the Group's Consolidated Income Statement. Shown on a continuing basis and before the impact of IFRS 16.
Measure of protability that excludes one-off exceptional items and IFRS 16 adjustments to provide comparability between years. This measure was linked to management incentives in the nancial year.
Reconciled within note 2 of the Consolidated Financial Statements.
Basic Earnings Per Share before exceptional items and IFRS 16 impact.
Measure of protability that excludes one-off exceptional items and IFRS 16 adjustments to provide comparability between years. This measure was linked to management incentives in the nancial year.
Reconciled within note 9 of the Consolidated Financial Statements.
Prot before tax before exceptional items and IFRS 16 impact.
Measure of protability that excludes one-off exceptional items and IFRS 16 adjustments to provide comparability between years.
| £million | FY25 | FY24 |
|---|---|---|
| Segment prot (as reconciled in note 2 of the Financial Statements) |
149.7 | 134.7 |
| Net nance costs excluding exceptional items (note 7) | (35.8) | (26.6) |
| IFRS 16 lease interest (note 13) | 22.2 | 20.8 |
| Adjusted pro–t before tax | 136.1 | 128.9 |
Revenue (including sales related taxes) generated in a period from sales of a product category divided by the total number of units of such products sold in such period.
Measure of sales performance.
Not applicable.
Results for the period had the exchange rates remained constant from the comparative period.
Measure of revenue growth that excludes the impact of foreign exchange.
| (£/US\$ million) | |
|---|---|
| FY25 Group revenue (£) | 1,651.5 |
| FY25 US revenue (\$) | 1,006.2 |
| FY25 US revenue (£) @ FY25 exchange rate | 785.6 |
| FY25 US revenue (£) @ FY24 exchange rate | 799.8 |
| FY25 Group revenue (£) at constant currency | 1,665.7 |
|---|---|
| FY25 exchange rate | £1: \$1.281 |
| FY24 exchange rate | £1: \$1.258 |
EBITDA before exceptional items presented in the Group's Consolidated Income Statement. Shown on a continuing basis before the impact of IFRS 16 and showroom opening and closing costs. These costs include rent (pre-IFRS 16), rates, payroll and other costs associated with the opening or closing of showrooms, or during closures when refurbishments are taking place.
Measure of protability that excludes one-off exceptional and non-underlying items, IFRS 16 adjustments and showroom opening and closing costs to allow for comparability between years.
| £million | FY25 | FY24 |
|---|---|---|
| Adjusted EBITDA | 192.3 | 178.9 |
| Showroom opening and closing costs | 6.9 | 8.9 |
| Share of loss of joint venture and associates | 0.2 | – |
| EBITDA | 199.4 | 187.8 |
Items that in the judgement of the Directors need to be disclosed by virtue of their size, nature or incidence, in order to draw the attention of the reader and to show the underlying business performance of the Group.
Draws the attention of the reader and to show the items that are signicant by virtue of their size, nature or incidence.
Disclosed in note 4 of the Group's Consolidated Financial Statements.
Cash ow shown on a pre-IFRS 16 basis excluding expansionary capex, acquisitions of subsidiaries, exceptional items, nancing activities and the purchase of own shares.
Represents the cash generated from operations including maintenance of capital assets. Demonstrates the amount of available cash ow for discretionary activities such as expansionary capex, dividends or acquisitions.
| £million | FY25 | FY24 |
|---|---|---|
| Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents | (15.4) | (21.5) |
| Net nancing cash ow | 21.1 | 91.7 |
| Interest paid | (13.4) | (9.2) |
| Lease payments | (80.6) | (68.1) |
| Acquisitions | 106.9 | 44.2 |
| Investment in joint venture and associates | 0.7 | – |
| Exceptional items – cash (note 4) | 8.6 | 2.5 |
| Expansionary capex | 72.6 | 78.0 |
| Disposal of European property, plant and equipment | (2.7) | – |
| Free cash žow | 97.8 | 117.6 |
Free cash ow divided by Adjusted EBITDA.
Measurement of the Group's ability to convert prot into free cash ow.
Free cash ow of £97.8 million divided by Adjusted EBITDA of £192.3 million shown as a percentage.
Liquidity headroom is unrestricted cash plus undrawn available facilities.
Liquidity headroom shows the amount of unrestricted funds available to the Group.
| £million | FY25 | FY24 |
|---|---|---|
| Multicurrency revolving credit facility | 275.0 | 225.0 |
| Term loan (\$125.0 million USD at 27 April 2025) | 93.9 | – |
| Total facility | 368.9 | 225.0 |
| Facility drawn | (195.1) | (115.0) |
| Unrestricted cash (note 16) | 79.7 | 99.3 |
| Total headroom | 253.5 | 209.3 |
Total borrowings (excluding capitalised transaction costs) less cash and cash equivalents and excludes IFRS 16 lease liabilities.
Measures the Group's indebtedness.
Reconciled in note 19 of the Consolidated Financial Statements.
Revenue less inventory recognised as an expense, commissions paid to the providers of interest-free credit and inventory provision movements.
Measures the prot made from the sale of inventory before showroom or overhead costs.
Refer to 4-Wall EBITDA.
Return on Capital Employed (ROCE) is dened as Adjusted EBIT divided by average capital employed, calculated on a Last Twelve Months (LTM) basis. Average capital employed is total assets less current liabilities excluding IFRS 16 lease liabilities.
ROCE demonstrates the efciency with which the Group utilises capital. This measure was linked to management incentives in the nancial year.
Adjusted EBIT of £149.7 million divided by the average capital employed, which is calculated as follows:
| £million Pre-IFRS 16 total assets |
FY25 1,123.0 |
FY24 958.9 |
|---|---|---|
| Pre-IFRS 16 current liabilities | (275.0) | (229.7) |
| Capital employed | 848.0 | 729.2 |
| Average capital employed | 788.6 | 690.1 |
Expansionary capital expenditure relates to new showrooms or ofces, relocations or refurbishments greater than £250,000.
LUXURY WATCHES
Watches that have a Recommended Retail Price greater than £1,000.
Jewellery that has a Recommended Retail Price greater than £500.
SHOWROOM MAINTENANCE CAPITAL EXPENDITURE/CAPEX Capital expenditure which is not considered expansionary.
The following tables reconcile from pre-IFRS 16 balances to statutory post- IFRS 16 balances.
| Pre-IFRS 16 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| and exceptional |
IFRS 16 | Exceptional | ||
| £million | items | adjustments | items | Statutory |
| Revenue | 1,651.5 | – | – | 1,651.5 |
| Net margin | 598.6 | – | (2.0) | 596.6 |
| Showroom costs | (292.7) | 65.9 | – | (226.8) |
| 4-Wall EBITDA | 305.9 | 65.9 | (2.0) | 369.8 |
| Overheads | (106.5) | – | (7.0) | (113.5) |
| EBITDA | 199.4 | 65.9 | (9.0) | 256.3 |
| Showroom opening and closing costs |
(6.9) | 4.7 | – | (2.2) |
| Share of loss of joint venture and associates |
(0.2) | – | – | (0.2) |
| Adjusted EBITDA | 192.3 | 70.6 | (9.0) | 253.9 |
| Depreciation, amortisation, loss on disposal, impairment of xed assets and lease modications |
(42.6) | (50.9) | (46.5) | (140.0) |
| Adjusted EBIT (Segment pro–t) | 149.7 | 19.7 | (55.5) | 113.9 |
Net nance costs (13.6) (22.2) (2.2) (38.0) Adjusted prot before tax 136.1 (2.5) (57.7) 75.9 Adjusted Basic EPS 41.6p (0.8)p (18.0)p 22.8p
| and | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| exceptional | IFRS 16 | Exceptional | |
| items | adjustments | items | Statutory |
| 1,537.9 | – | – | 1,537.9 |
| 562.2 | – | 1.7 | 563.9 |
| (289.1) | 64.9 | – | (224.2) |
| 273.1 | 64.9 | 1.7 | 339.7 |
| (85.3) | – | (6.2) | (91.5) |
| 187.8 | 64.9 | (4.5) | 248.2 |
| (8.9) | 5.3 | – | (3.6) |
| 244.6 | |||
| (44.2) | (53.0) | (27.4) | (124.6) |
| 134.7 | 17.2 | (31.9) | 120.0 |
| (5.8) | (20.8) | (1.3) | (27.9) |
| 128.9 | (3.6) | (33.2) | 92.1 |
| 38.0p | (1.2)p | (11.8)p | 25.0p |
| Pre-IFRS 16 178.9 |
70.2 | (4.5) |
| IFRS 16 | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| £million | Pre-IFRS 16 | adjustments Post-IFRS 16 | |
| Goodwill and intangibles | 304.1 | – | 304.1 |
| Property, plant and equipment | 191.9 | 0.5 | 192.4 |
| IFRS 16 right-of-use assets | – | 358.6 | 358.6 |
| Investment in joint venture and associates | 0.5 | – | 0.5 |
| Inventories | 447.4 | – | 447.4 |
| Trade and other receivables | 71.1 | (10.6) | 60.5 |
| Trade and other payables | (305.5) | 46.0 | (259.5) |
| IFRS 16 lease liabilities | – | (454.6) | (454.6) |
| Net debt | (96.2) | – | (96.2) |
| Other | (47.0) | 33.4 | (13.6) |
| Net assets | 566.3 | (26.7) | 539.6 |
| IFRS 16 | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| £million | Pre-IFRS 16 | adjustments Post-IFRS 16 | |
| Goodwill and intangibles | 215.7 | – | 215.7 |
| Property, plant and equipment | 193.1 | (1.7) | 191.4 |
| IFRS 16 right-of-use assets | – | 381.8 | 381.8 |
| Inventories | 393.3 | – | 393.3 |
| Trade and other receivables | 36.2 | (11.6) | 24.6 |
| Trade and other payables | (263.3) | 46.8 | (216.5) |
| IFRS 16 lease liabilities | – | (460.4) | (460.4) |
| Net cash | 0.7 | – | 0.7 |
| Other | (29.2) | 21.6 | (7.6) |
| Net assets | 546.5 | (23.5) | 523.0 |
Watches of Switzerland Group PLC
Aurum House, 2 Elland Road, Braunstone, Leicester LE3 1TT Registered in England and Wales
Company Number: 11838443 VAT number: 834 8634 04
Independent Auditor Ernst & Young LLP, 1 More London Place, London, SE1 2AF
Slaughter and May, One Bunhill Row, London, EC1Y 8YY
Equiniti, Aspect House, Spencer Road, Lancing, West Sussex, BN99 6DA
Barclays Bank plc, 5 The North Colonnade, Canary Wharf, London, E14 4BB
Jefferies International Limited, 100 Bishopsgate, London, EC2N 4JL
Headland PR Consultancy LLP, Cannon Green, 27 Bush Lane, London, EC4R 0AA
| Trading Update: | 3 September 2025 |
|---|---|
| AGM: | 3 September 2025 |
| H1 FY26 results: | December 2025 |
| Trading Update: | February 2026 |
| Financial year-end: | April 2026 |
The AGM will be held at 2.30pm on Wednesday, 3 September 2025 at our ofces at 36 North Row, London, W1K 6DH. The Notice of Meeting which accompanies this report and accounts sets out the business to be transacted.
Please contact our Registrar Equiniti directly for all enquiries about your shareholding. Visit their website shareview.co.uk for online information about your shareholding. You will need your shareholder reference number which can be found on your share certicate or telephone the Registrar direct on +44 (0)371 384 2577. The overseas shareholder helpline number is +44 (0)371 384 2577. Lines are open 8.30am to 5.30pm Monday to Friday.
For more information see thewosgroupplc.com/investors/shareholder-contacts.
Cautionary statement: The Annual Report and Accounts contain certain forward looking statements with respect to the operations, performance and nancial conditions of the Group. By their nature, these statements involve uncertainty since future events and circumstances can cause results and developments to differ materially from those anticipated. The forward looking statements reect knowledge and information available at the date of preparation of this Annual Report and Accounts and the Company undertakes no obligation to update these forward looking statements. Nothing in this Annual Report and Accounts should be construed as a prot forecast. Certain regulatory performance data contained in this Annual Report and Accounts is subject to regulatory audit.
The term 'Group' means Watches of Switzerland Group PLC (Company registration number 11838443) and its subsidiaries, associates and joint ventures.
Our Annual Report and Accounts is available online. View or download the full Annual Report and Accounts from: thewosgroupplc.com/investors/results-centre.
Please be very wary of any unsolicited contact about your investments or offers of free company reports. It may be from an overseas 'broker' who could sell you worthless or high risk shares. If you deal with an unauthorised rm, you will not be eligible to receive payment under the Financial Services Compensation Scheme. Further information and a list of unauthorised rms that have targeted UK investors is available from the Financial Conduct Authority at: fca.org.uk.

Printed by Principal Colour on FSC® certied paper.
Principal Colour works to the EMAS standard and its Environmental Management System is certied to ISO 14001
This report is printed on Splendorgel EW digital uncoated paper which is derived from sustainable sources. Manufactured at a paper mill registered to the Environmental Management System ISO 14001 and Forest Stewardship Council® chain of custody certied.
Designed and produced by SampsonMay Telephone: 020 7403 4099 www.sampsonmay.com
AURUM HOUSE 2 ELLAND ROAD LEICESTER LE3 1TT
THEWOSGROUPPLC.COM
Have a question? We'll get back to you promptly.