Regulatory Filings • Dec 22, 2022
Regulatory Filings
Open in ViewerOpens in native device viewer
22 DEC 2022
Fitch Ratings - London - 22 Dec 2022: Fitch Ratings has affirmed Bank Hapoalim B.M.'s Long-Term Issuer Default Rating (IDR) at 'A' with a Stable Outlook and Short-Term IDR at 'F1+'. The bank's Viability Rating (VR) has been affirmed at 'a-'.
Support Drives Ratings: Hapoalim's IDRs reflect Fitch's view of a very high probability that Israel (A+/Stable/F1+) would provide support to the bank, if needed. Fitch believes that Israel's ability and propensity to support Hapoalim is very high, particularly given the bank's systemic importance in the country, with about 30% of banking system assets.
Universal Banking Franchise: Hapoalim's VR reflects a strong franchise in retail and corporate banking in Israel, asset quality that we expect to remain resilient considering the bank's material exposure to the property sector, and adequate capitalisation. The VR also reflects the bank's sound funding, given its large deposit base, and strengthening profitability, which in 2022 benefited from significant demand for credit, particularly in the mortgage market, and from several interest rate increases during the year.
Close Regulatory Oversight: Hapoalim's underwriting standards are conservative, helped by tight regulatory limits and oversight. Like other Israeli banks, Hapoalim has material exposure to the construction and real estate sectors, which results in risk concentration and makes asset quality vulnerable to a sharp decline in real estate prices. However, the majority of exposure is to residential projects, which we expect to continue to perform adequately given high population growth and structural demand for housing in Israel.
Asset Quality Remains Sound: Hapoalim's impaired loans ratio decreased to 0.8% at end-September 2022, partly benefiting from high loan growth, particularly in mortgages. We expect to see higher loan impairment charges next year as the loans season. Asset quality will also be affected by higher interest rates and high inflation (albeit lower than many other countries), but due to sound underwriting and resilient operating environment we expect the impaired loans ratio to remain below 1.5% over the next two years.
Strong Earnings Recovery: Profitability benefited from strong loan growth (+8% in 9M22), which boosted net interest income, as well as wider net interest margins due to increasing interest rates. Cost efficiency continues to improve due to ongoing efficiency programmes. We expect positive profitability trends to remain, with the bank's operating profit/risk-weighted assets (RWAs) ratio expected to remain above 2% in 2023, despite slowing loan demand. This is due to weakened credit demand on higher mortgage rates and a decrease in housing transactions in Israel, already observable in 4Q22.
Capital Buffers Adequate: Headroom in our assessment is limited, but capitalisation has remained adequate, with a common equity Tier 1 (CET1) ratio of 11.10% at end-September 2022. Hapoalim calculates RWAs using the standardised approach, which results in fairly high RWAs density (RWAs/total assets) of 62%. We expect the bank to maintain a moderate buffer above the minimum regulatory requirement, which has reverted to 10.23% following a temporary reduction during the pandemic. Our capital assessment also considers the bank's improved internal capital generation.
Large, Stable Deposit Base: Hapoalim has a solid and stable funding basis that consists mostly of customer deposits, which exceed the size of the loan book. It also has proven access to domestic and international debt markets. Liquidity is strong, with a 126% liquidity coverage ratio at end-September 2022, which is adequately above the 100% minimum regulatory requirement.
Hapoalim's 'F1+' Short-Term IDR is the higher of two possible Short-Term IDRs that map to a 'A' Long-Term IDR. This is because we view the sovereign's propensity to support as more certain in the near term.
Sovereign Support: Hapoalim's IDRs are primarily sensitive to a weakening of Israel's ability or propensity to support the bank. A downgrade of Israel's Long-Term IDR would likely result in a downgrade of Hapoalim's Government Support Rating (GSR) and its IDRs. A reduced propensity of the Israeli authorities to support the country's largest banks, which could be signalled by the introduction of a deposit guarantee scheme to start and subsequently effective bank resolution legislation, would also result in a downgrade of the bank's IDRs and GSR.
Asset Quality and Capitalisation: A sharp deterioration of asset quality that results in an impaired loan ratio of above 2% for an extended period combined with the CET1 ratio declining below current levels and weakening internal capital generation could result in a VR downgrade. Given the bank's significant exposure to the real estate sector, a sharp decline in real estate prices would put pressure on asset quality and therefore on the VR.
Limited Upside: An upgrade of Israel's Long-Term IDR is unlikely to result in an upgrade of the bank's GSR and Long-Term IDR as we typically do not assign GSRs above 'a' for domestic systemically important banks in countries whose sovereigns are rated 'AA' or 'AA-' and where support propensity is high.
An upgrade of Hapoalim's VR is unlikely given the bank's geographical concentration and would require a material and structural improvement in profitability that allows the bank to generate stronger and more stable operating profit/RWAs while also maintaining materially higher capital ratios, which we do not expect.
Subordinated Debt: Subordinated debt is notched down from the bank's VR, in accordance with Fitch's assessment of each instrument's respective non-performance and relative loss severity risk profiles.
Hapoalim's USD1 billion Tier 2 notes are rated two notches below the bank's VR, reflecting poor recovery prospects in the event of a failure of the bank, in line with Fitch's base-case notching for Tier 2 debt.
Subordinated Debt: The ratings of Hapoalim's Tier 2 notes are sensitive to changes in the bank's VR.
The operating environment score has been assigned below the implied score due to the following adjustment reasons: sovereign rating (negative), size and structure of economy (negative)
The business profile score has been assigned above the implied score due to the following adjustment reason: market position (positive)
The capitalisation & leverage score has been assigned above the implied score due to the following adjustment reason: leverage and risk-weight calculation (positive).
International scale credit ratings of Financial Institutions and Covered Bond issuers have a best-case rating upgrade scenario (defined as the 99th percentile of rating transitions, measured in a positive direction) of three notches over a three-year rating horizon; and a worst-case rating downgrade scenario (defined as the 99th percentile of rating transitions, measured in a negative direction) of four notches over three years. The complete span of best- and worst-case scenario credit ratings for all rating categories ranges from 'AAA' to 'D'. Best- and worst-case scenario credit ratings are based on historical performance. For more information about the methodology used to determine sectorspecific best- and worst-case scenario credit ratings, visit https://www.fitchratings.com/site/re/ 10111579
The principal sources of information used in the analysis are described in the Applicable Criteria.
Hapoalim's IDRs and GSR reflect Fitch's expectation of a very high probability of state support from Israel.
Unless otherwise disclosed in this section, the highest level of ESG credit relevance is a score of '3'. This means ESG issues are credit-neutral or have only a minimal credit impact on the entity, either due to their nature or the way in which they are being managed by the entity. For more information on Fitch's ESG Relevance Scores, visit https://www.fitchratings.com/esg
Director Primary Rating Analyst +44 20 3530 2723 Fitch Ratings Ltd 30 North Colonnade, Canary Wharf London E14 5GN
Analyst Secondary Rating Analyst +44 20 3530 1919
Senior Director Committee Chairperson +34 93 323 8405
London +44 20 3530 1103 [email protected]
| ENTITY/DEBT | RATING | RECOVERY | PRIOR | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bank Hapoalim B.M. |
LT IDR | A | Affirmed | A | |
| ST IDR | F1+ | Affirmed | F1+ | ||
| Viability | a- | Affirmed | a | ||
| Government | a | Affirmed | a |
| ENTITY/DEBT | RATING | RECOVERY | PRIOR | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Support | ||||||||
| • subordinated LT |
BBB | Affirmed | BBB | |||||
| RATINGS KEY OUTLOOK WATCH |
||||||||
| POSITIVE | ||||||||
| NEGATIVE | ||||||||
| EVOLVING | ||||||||
| STABLE |
Bank Rating Criteria (pub.07 Sep 2022) (including rating assumption sensitivity)
Bank Hapoalim B.M. UK Issued, EU Endorsed
All Fitch Ratings (Fitch) credit ratings are subject to certain limitations and disclaimers. Please read these limitations and disclaimers by following this link: https://www.fitchratings.com/ understandingcreditratings. In addition, the following https://www.fitchratings.com/rating-definitionsdocument details Fitch's rating definitions for each rating scale and rating categories, including definitions relating to default. ESMA and the FCA are required to publish historical default rates in a central repository in accordance with Articles 11(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1060/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 September 2009 and The Credit Rating Agencies (Amendment etc.) (EU Exit) Regulations 2019 respectively.
Published ratings, criteria, and methodologies are available from this site at all times. Fitch's code of conduct, confidentiality, conflicts of interest, affiliate firewall, compliance, and other relevant policies and procedures are also available from the Code of Conduct section of this site. Directors and shareholders' relevant interests are available at https://www.fitchratings.com/site/regulatory. Fitch may have provided another permissible or ancillary service to the rated entity or its related third parties. Details of permissible or ancillary service(s) for which the lead analyst is based in an ESMA- or FCA-registered Fitch Ratings company (or branch of such a company) can be found on the entity summary page for this issuer on the Fitch Ratings website.
In issuing and maintaining its ratings and in making other reports (including forecast information), Fitch relies on factual information it receives from issuers and underwriters and from other sources Fitch believes to be credible. Fitch conducts a reasonable investigation of the factual information relied upon by it in accordance with its ratings methodology, and obtains reasonable verification of that information from independent sources, to the extent such sources are available for a given security or in a given jurisdiction. The manner of Fitch's factual investigation and the scope of the third-party verification it obtains will vary depending on the nature of the rated security and its issuer, the requirements and practices in the jurisdiction in which the rated security is offered and sold and/or the issuer is located, the availability and nature of relevant public information, access to the management of the issuer and its advisers, the availability of pre-existing third-party verifications such as audit reports, agreed-upon procedures letters, appraisals, actuarial reports, engineering reports, legal opinions and other reports provided by third parties, the availability of independent and competent third- party verification sources with respect to the particular security or in the particular jurisdiction of the issuer, and a variety of other factors. Users of Fitch's ratings and reports should understand that neither an enhanced factual investigation nor any third-party verification can ensure that all of the information Fitch relies on in connection with a rating or a report will be accurate and complete. Ultimately, the issuer and its advisers are responsible for the accuracy of the information they provide to Fitch and to the market in offering documents and other reports. In issuing its ratings and its reports, Fitch must rely on the work of experts, including independent auditors with respect to financial statements and attorneys with respect to legal and tax matters. Further, ratings and forecasts of financial and other information are inherently forward-looking and embody assumptions and predictions about future events that by their nature cannot be verified as facts. As a result, despite any verification of current facts, ratings and forecasts can be affected by future events or conditions that were not anticipated at the time a rating or forecast was issued or affirmed.
The information in this report is provided "as is" without any representation or warranty of any kind, and Fitch does not represent or warrant that the report or any of its contents will meet any of the requirements of a recipient of the report. A Fitch rating is an opinion as to the creditworthiness of a security. This opinion and reports made by Fitch are based on established criteria and methodologies that Fitch is continuously evaluating and updating. Therefore, ratings and reports are the collective work product of Fitch and no individual, or group of individuals, is solely responsible for a rating or a report. The rating does not address the risk of loss due to risks other than credit risk, unless such risk is specifically mentioned. Fitch is not engaged in the offer or sale of any security. All Fitch reports have shared authorship. Individuals identified in a Fitch report were involved in, but are not solely
responsible for, the opinions stated therein. The individuals are named for contact purposes only. A report providing a Fitch rating is neither a prospectus nor a substitute for the information assembled, verified and presented to investors by the issuer and its agents in connection with the sale of the securities. Ratings may be changed or withdrawn at any time for any reason in the sole discretion of Fitch. Fitch does not provide investment advice of any sort. Ratings are not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. Ratings do not comment on the adequacy of market price, the suitability of any security for a particular investor, or the tax-exempt nature or taxability of payments made in respect to any security. Fitch receives fees from issuers, insurers, guarantors, other obligors, and underwriters for rating securities. Such fees generally vary from US\$1,000 to US\$750,000 (or the applicable currency equivalent) per issue. In certain cases, Fitch will rate all or a number of issues issued by a particular issuer, or insured or guaranteed by a particular insurer or guarantor, for a single annual fee. Such fees are expected to vary from US\$10,000 to US\$1,500,000 (or the applicable currency equivalent). The assignment, publication, or dissemination of a rating by Fitch shall not constitute a consent by Fitch to use its name as an expert in connection with any registration statement filed under the United States securities laws, the Financial Services and Markets Act of 2000 of the United Kingdom, or the securities laws of any particular jurisdiction. Due to the relative efficiency of electronic publishing and distribution, Fitch research may be available to electronic subscribers up to three days earlier than to print subscribers.
For Australia, New Zealand, Taiwan and South Korea only: Fitch Australia Pty Ltd holds an Australian financial services license (AFS license no. 337123) which authorizes it to provide credit ratings to wholesale clients only. Credit ratings information published by Fitch is not intended to be used by persons who are retail clients within the meaning of the Corporations Act 2001. Fitch Ratings, Inc. is registered with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission as a Nationally Recognized Statistical Rating Organization (the "NRSRO"). While certain of the NRSRO's credit rating subsidiaries are listed on Item 3 of Form NRSRO and as such are authorized to issue credit ratings on behalf of the NRSRO (see https://www.fitchratings.com/site/regulatory), other credit rating subsidiaries are not listed on Form NRSRO (the "non-NRSROs") and therefore credit ratings issued by those subsidiaries are not issued on behalf of the NRSRO. However, non-NRSRO personnel may participate in determining credit ratings issued by or on behalf of the NRSRO.
Copyright © 2022 by Fitch Ratings, Inc., Fitch Ratings Ltd. and its subsidiaries. 33 Whitehall Street, NY, NY 10004. Telephone: 1-800-753-4824, (212) 908-0500. Fax: (212) 480-4435. Reproduction or retransmission in whole or in part is prohibited except by permission. All rights reserved.
Fitch's international credit ratings produced outside the EU or the UK, as the case may be, are endorsed for use by regulated entities within the EU or the UK, respectively, for regulatory purposes, pursuant to the terms of the EU CRA Regulation or the UK Credit Rating Agencies (Amendment etc.) (EU Exit) Regulations 2019, as the case may be. Fitch's approach to endorsement in the EU and the UK can be found on Fitch's Regulatory Affairs page on Fitch's website. The endorsement status of international
credit ratings is provided within the entity summary page for each rated entity and in the transaction detail pages for structured finance transactions on the Fitch website. These disclosures are updated on a daily basis.
Building tools?
Free accounts include 100 API calls/year for testing.
Have a question? We'll get back to you promptly.