Regulatory Filings • Nov 26, 2023
Regulatory Filings
Open in ViewerOpens in native device viewer
Update
Support Drives Ratings: The Issuer Default Ratings (IDRs) of Israel Discount Bank Limited (IDB) reflect Fitch Ratings' view of a very high probability that Israel (A+/RWN/F1+/RWN) would provide support to IDB, if needed. Fitch assesses Israel's ability and propensity to support IDB as very high, particularly given the bank's systemic importance in the country, with about 15% of banking system assets.
Universal Banking Franchise: IDB's Viability Rating (VR) reflects a good domestic universal banking franchise, improved asset quality and profitability, and adequate capitalisation and funding. While IDB is now required to reduce its shareholdings in its credit card subsidiary, Israel Credit Cards Ltd. (Cal), to improve competition, this does not significantly alter our view of IDB's business profile.
High Loan Growth: The bank grew its mortgage book by 13% in 2022, taking market share from competitors, but we view this segment as lower-risk due to conservative underwriting standards as a result of prudent regulatory limits and close oversight. IDB has also grown construction and real estate lending, a higher-risk segment, by 7.2% over the same period, though demand is driven by high population growth in Israel, ultimately translating into housing credit demand, which mitigates risks.
Sound Asset Quality: Impaired loans were 0.8% of gross loans at end-1H23, which is low compared to both domestic and international peers, but we view this in the context of high loan growth, as many loans, in particular mortgage loans, have not seasoned. We expect the impaired loans ratio to be slightly higher than domestic peers through the cycle as long as IDB owns a credit card subsidiary, but to remain below 1.5% over the next two years.
Growth, Higher Rates Benefit Earnings: Strong 46% net interest income growth yoy in 1H23 was supported by interest-rate rises and higher loan volumes. Operating profitability, which has historically been lower than peers', is benefitting from improved cost efficiency, with a Fitch-calculated cost/income ratio of 47%, compared with an average of 73% over the past decade. We expect operating profit to continue to benefit from higher net interest income, due to higher interest rates, and improving cost controls.
Adequate Capital Buffers: Headroom in our assessment is limited, but capitalisation has remained adequate, with a 10.35% common equity Tier 1 (CET1) ratio at end-1H23 versus its 9.19% minimum regulatory requirement. We expect the bank to manage its capitalisation proactively, particularly during periods of high growth, and to maintain the current buffers over regulatory requirements.
Our capitalisation assessment also considers the bank's improved internal capital generation and its fairly high ratio of RWAs to total assets (end-1H23: 68%), as the bank uses the standardised approach to calculate credit-risk RWAs.
Sound Funding and Liquidity: IDB's 78% loans-to-deposits ratio is broadly in line with that of domestic and international peers. Funding benefits from the bank's stable and granular deposit base, split equally between retail and corporate deposits. Liquidity is sound, with a liquidity coverage ratio of 135% at end-1H23. In 2023, IDB accessed international wholesale funding markets by issuing USD800 million senior unsecured notes.
IDB's 'F1+' Short-Term IDR is the higher of two possible Short-Term IDRs that map to an 'A' Long-Term IDR. This is because we view the sovereign's propensity to support as more certain in the near term.
Banks Universal Commercial Banks Israel
| Foreign Currency | |
|---|---|
| Long-Term IDR | A |
| Short-Term IDR | F1+ |
| Long-Term IDR (xgs) | A-(xgs) |
| Short-Term IDR (xgs) | F2(xgs) |
| Viability Rating | a |
| Government Support Rating | a |
| Sovereign Risk (Israel) | |
| Long-Term Foreign-Currency IDR |
A+ |
| Long-Term Local-Currency IDR | A+ |
| Country Ceiling | AA |
| Watches | |
| Long-Term Foreign-Currency IDR |
Negative |
| Short-Term Foreign-Currency IDR |
Negative |
| Government Support Rating | Negative |
Sovereign Long-Term Foreign-Currency IDR Negative Sovereign Long-Term Local-Currency IDR Negative
Bank Rating Criteria (September 2023)
Fitch Places Four Israeli Banks on RWN after Sovereign Action (October 2023) Fitch Places Israel's 'A+' IDRs on Rating Watch Negative (October 2023) Global Economic Outlook (September 2023)
Michael Bojko, CFA +44 20 3530 2723 [email protected]
Rory Rushton +44 20 3530 1919 [email protected]
A downgrade of the sovereign rating is likely to result in a downgrade of IDB's GSR and IDRs.
A sharp deterioration of asset quality that results in an impaired loan ratio of above 2% for an extended period, combined with the CET1 declining below current levels and weakening internal capital generation, could result in a VR downgrade. Given the bank's significant exposure to the real estate sector, a sharp decline in real estate prices would put pressure on asset quality, and therefore on the VR.
IDB's IDRs are likely to be affirmed and removed from RWN if Israel's ratings are affirmed and removed from RWN. An upgrade of the IDRs is unlikely due to the RWN on the sovereign IDRs.
An upgrade of IDB's VR is unlikely given the bank's geographical concentration and would require a material and structural improvement in profitability that allows the bank to generate stronger and more stable operating profit/RWAs while also maintaining materially higher capital ratios, which we do not expect.
| Rating Level | Rating | Outlook |
|---|---|---|
| Senior unsecured: long term | A | Watch Negative |
| Source: Fitch Ratings |
The 'A' rating of IDB's USD800 million senior unsecured notes is in line with IDB's 'A' IDR and in line with the baseline approach for senior debt ratings under our criteria. This reflects our view that a default on senior unsecured debt equates to a default of the bank. It also reflects Fitch's expectation of average recovery prospects.
On 19 October 2023 we placed the support-driven 'A' Long-Term Issuer Default Ratings (IDRs) of four Israeli banks, including IDB, on RWN following similar action on the sovereign. The RWN reflects the heightened risk of a widening of Israel's current conflict.
The banks' 'F1+' Short-Term IDRs, their 'a' GSRs, and their 'A' senior debt ratings were also placed on RWN. While the ratings reflect our view of a very high probability that Israel would support the banks, if needed, the RWN reflects the heightened risk that the Israel-Gaza crisis widens.
| Israel Discount Bank Limited | ESG Relevance: | Banks Ratings Navigator |
|||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Financial Profile | |||||||||||
| Environment Operating |
Business Profile |
Profile Risk |
Quality Asset |
Profitability Earnings & |
Capitalisation & Leverage |
Funding & Liquidity |
Implied Viability Rating |
Rating Viability |
Government Support |
Default Rating Issuer |
|
| 20% | 10% | 20% | 15% | 25% | 10% | ||||||
| aaa | aaa | aaa | aaa | AAA | |||||||
| aa+ | aa+ | aa+ | aa+ | AA+ | |||||||
| aa | aa | aa | aa | AA | |||||||
| aa | aa- | aa- | aa- | AA- | |||||||
| a+ | a+ | a+ | a+ | A+ | |||||||
| a | a | a | a RWN | A RWN | |||||||
| a- | a- | a- | a- | A- | |||||||
| bbb+ | bbb+ | bbb+ | bbb+ | BBB+ | |||||||
| bbb | bbb | bbb | bbb | BBB | |||||||
| bbb- | bbb- | bbb- | bbb- | BBB- | |||||||
| bb+ | bb+ | pp+ | bb+ | BB+ | |||||||
| bb | bb | bb | bb | BB | |||||||
| bb- | bb- | bb- | bb- | BB- | |||||||
| b+ | b+ | b+ | b+ | B+ | |||||||
| b | b | b | b | B | |||||||
| b- | b- | b- | b- | B- | |||||||
| CCC+ | CCC+ | CCC+ | CCC+ | CCC+ | |||||||
| CCC | CCC | CCC | CCC | CCC | |||||||
| CCC- | CCC- | CCC- | CCC- | CCC- | |||||||
| CC | CC | CC | CC | CC | |||||||
| C | C | C | C | C | |||||||
| f | f | f | ns | Dor RD |
The Key Rating Driver (KRD) weightings used to determine the implied VR are shown as percentages at the top. In cases where the implied VR is adjusted upwards or downwards to arrive at the VR, the KRD associated with the adjustment reason is highlighted in red. The shaded areas indicate the benchmark-implied scores for each KRD.
The operating environment score has been assigned below the implied score due to the following adjustment reasons: sovereign rating (negative), size and structure of economy (negative)
The business profile score has been assigned above the implied score due to the following adjustment reason: market position (positive)
The capitalisation & leverage score has been assigned above the implied score due to the following adjustment reason: leverage and risk-weight calculation (positive).
| 30 Jun 23 | 31 Dec 22 Year end (ILSm) |
31 Dec 21 Year end (ILSm) |
31 Dec 20 Year end (ILSm) |
31 Dec 19 Year end (ILSm) |
||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6 months - interim 6 months - interim | ||||||
| (USDm) | (ILSm) | |||||
| Reviewed - | Reviewed - | Audited - | Audited - | Audited - | Audited - | |
| unqualified | unqualified | unqualified | unqualified | unqualified | unqualified | |
| Summary income statement | ||||||
| Net interest and dividend income | 1,535 | 5,678 | 8,707 | 6,540 | 5,907 | 5,905 |
| Net fees and commissions | 475 | 1,756 | 3,404 | 3,125 | 2,826 | 2,972 |
| Other operating income | 173 | 641 | 499 | 858 | 1,178 | 792 |
| Total operating income | 2,182 | 8,075 | 12,610 | 10,523 | 9,911 | 9,669 |
| Operating costs | 1,054 | 3,901 | 7,217 | 6,858 | 6,681 | 6,299 |
| Pre-impairment operating profit | 1,128 | 4,174 | 5,393 | 3,665 | 3,230 | 3,370 |
| Loan and other impairment charges | 149 | 550 | 467 | -591 | 1,747 | 721 |
| Operating profit | 979 | 3,624 | 4,926 | 4,256 | 1,483 | 2,649 |
| Other non-operating items (net) | 80 | 297 | 421 | 90 | 73 | 42 |
| Tax | 375 | 1,389 | 1,806 | 1,516 | 549 | 932 |
| Net income | 684 | 2,532 | 3,541 | 2,830 | 1,007 | 1,759 |
| Other comprehensive income | 72 | 266 | -734 | -374 | -418 | 76 |
| Fitch comprehensive income | 756 | 2,798 | 2,807 | 2,456 | 589 | 1,835 |
| Summary balance sheet | ||||||
| Assets | ||||||
| Gross loans | 70,217 | 259,804 | 246,887 | 218,860 | 195,952 | 186,506 |
| - Of which impaired | 579 | 2,143 | 1,520 | 1,797 | 2,207 | 1,814 |
| Loan loss allowances | 965 | 3,571 | 3,209 | 3,040 | 3,761 | 2,524 |
| Net loans | 69,252 | 256,233 | 243,678 | 215,820 | 192,191 | 183,982 |
| Derivatives | 3,351 | 12,400 | 11,420 | 5,522 | 6,400 | 4,545 |
| Other securities and earning assets | 15,147 | 56,044 | 47,003 | 46,285 | 44,832 | 39,116 |
| Total earning assets | 87,751 | 324,677 | 302,101 | 267,627 | 243,423 | 227,643 |
| Cash and due from banks | 15,323 | 56,696 | 65,713 | 59,638 | 42,936 | 26,044 |
| Other assets | 2,822 | 10,442 | 8,940 | 7,823 | 7,610 | 6,136 |
| Total assets | 105,896 | 391,815 | 376,754 | 335,088 | 293,969 | 259,823 |
| Liabilities | ||||||
| Customer deposits | 79,133 | 292,792 | 292,410 | 261,253 | 226,462 | 201,631 |
| Interbank and other short-term funding | 6,739 | 24,936 | 19,115 | 12,534 | 13,268 | 6,765 |
| Other long-term funding | 4,454 | 16,479 | 12,308 | 13,219 | 8,392 | 11,309 |
| Trading liabilities and derivatives | 2,736 | 10,124 | 9,348 | 6,323 | 7,365 | 4,839 |
| Total funding and derivatives | 93,062 | 344,331 | 333,181 | 293,329 | 255,487 | 224,544 |
| Other liabilities | 5,352 | 19,802 | 18,095 | 17,759 | 16,946 | 14,266 |
| Preference shares and hybrid capital | n.a. | n.a. | n.a. | 1,852 | 1,809 | 1,820 |
| Total equity | 7,482 | 27,682 | 25,478 | 22,148 | 19,727 | 19,193 |
| Total liabilities and equity | 105,896 | 391,815 | 376,754 | 335,088 | 293,969 | 259,823 |
| Exchange rate | USD1 = ILS3.7 |
USD1 = ILS3.519 |
USD1 = ILS3.15 |
USD1 = ILS3.222 |
USD1 = ILS3.463 |
|
Source: Fitch Ratings, Fitch Solutions, Israel Discount Bank Limited
| 30 Jun 23 | 31 Dec 22 | 31 Dec 21 | 31 Dec 20 | 31 Dec 19 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ratios (%; annualised as appropriate) | |||||
| Profitability | |||||
| Operating profit/risk-weighted assets | 2.8 | 2.0 | 2.0 | 0.8 | 1.4 |
| Net interest income/average earning assets | 3.6 | 3.1 | 2.6 | 2.5 | 2.7 |
| Non-interest expense/gross revenue | 48.3 | 57.4 | 65.4 | 67.8 | 65.3 |
| Net income/average equity | 19.2 | 14.7 | 13.4 | 5.2 | 9.5 |
| Asset quality | |||||
| Impaired loans ratio | 0.8 | 0.6 | 0.8 | 1.1 | 1.0 |
| Growth in gross loans | 5.2 | 12.8 | 11.7 | 5.1 | 9.4 |
| Loan loss allowances/impaired loans | 166.6 | 211.1 | 169.2 | 170.4 | 139.1 |
| Loan impairment charges/average gross loans | 0.4 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 0.9 | 0.4 |
| Capitalisation | |||||
| Common equity Tier 1 ratio | 10.4 | 10.3 | 10.1 | 10.2 | 10.3 |
| Fully loaded common equity Tier 1 ratio | n.a. | 10.1 | 10.0 | 10.0 | n.a. |
| Tangible common equity/tangible assets | 7.0 | 5.9 | 5.7 | 6.3 | 7.0 |
| Basel leverage ratio | 6.4 | 6.2 | 6.0 | 6.3 | 6.9 |
| Net impaired loans/common equity Tier 1 | -5.2 | -6.7 | -5.7 | -7.9 | -3.7 |
| Funding and liquidity | |||||
| Gross loans/customer deposits | 88.7 | 84.4 | 83.8 | 86.5 | 92.5 |
| Liquidity coverage ratio | 134.5 | 130.5 | 123.1 | 147.5 | 121.2 |
| Customer deposits/total non-equity funding | 87.6 | 90.3 | 90.4 | 90.6 | 91.0 |
| Net stable funding ratio | 122.7 | 124.8 | 126.7 | n.a. | n.a. |
Source: Fitch Ratings, Fitch Solutions, Israel Discount Bank Limited
| The colours indicate the weighting of each KRD in the assessment. | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Higher influence Moderate influence Lower influence
IDB's IDRs are driven by its GSR, which is in line with the domestic systemically important bank (D-SIB) GSR for Israel and reflects Fitch's view of a very high probability that Israel would provide support to IDB, if needed. In Fitch's view, Israel has a strong ability to support its banking sector, and its propensity to support IDB is high, particularly given IDB's systemic importance in the country with a market share of about 15% of banking-sector assets.
| Israel Discount Bank Limited has 5 ESG potential rating drivers Israel Discount Bark Limited has exposure to compliance issues mis-selling, repossessionforedas re proteces, consumer data |
key driver | 0 | 155 Uns | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| protection (clata security) but this has very low impact on the rating. Govemance is minimally relesant to the rating and is not currently a driver. |
0 | 155 Unis | |||
| potential driver | 5 | 195 UES | |||
| not a rating driver | বা | 155 Uns | 2 | ||
| 5 | 155 Uns |
| STORICI I POLIC O | 100000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 | 000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 | 1000 - 1100 - 1100 - 110 - 110 - 11 | Car 100 Market Company of Children | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GHG Emissions & Air Quality | n.a. | 0.3. | 5 | How to Read This Pag ESG relevance scores n gradation. Red (5) is mo (1) is least relevant. |
||
| Energy Management | n.a. | 0.3. | 4 | The Environmental ( tables break out the ES issues that are most re scores are assigned to |
||
| Water & Wastewater Management | n.a | n.a. | 3 | credit-relewance of the overall credit rating. The factor(s) within which the in Fitch's credit analysis |
||
| Waste & Hazardous Materials Management; Ecological Impacts |
n.a. | n.a. | 2 | of the frequency of relevance scomes. They relevance scores or aggr The Credit-Relevant E |
||
| Exposure to Environmental Impacts | Impact of extreme weather events on assets and or 2 operations and corresponding risk appelite & management; catastrophe risk; credit concentrations |
Business Profile (incl. Management & governance); Risk Profile; Asset Quality |
a visualization of the free relevance scores across The three columns to th summarize rating relev |
| General Issues | \$ \$core | Sector-\$pecific lasues | Reference | S Relevance | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Human Rights, Community Relations, Access & Afordability |
2 | Senices for underbanked and underserved communities: SME and community development programs; financial literacy programs |
Business Profile (incl. Management & governance); Risk Profile | 5 | |
| Customer Welfare - Fair Messaging, Privacy & Data Security |
3 | Compliance risks including fair lending practices, mis- selling, repossession/foreclosure practices, consumer data protection (data security) |
Operating Environment; Business Profile (incl. Management & govemance); Risk Profile |
4 | |
| Labor Relations & Practices | 2 | Impact of labor negotiations, including board/employee compensation and composition |
Business Profile (incl. Management & governance) | 3 | |
| Employee Wellbeing | 1 | n.a. | n.3. | 2 | |
| Exposure to Social Implacis | Shift in social or consumer preferences as a result of an 2 institution's social positions, or social and/or political disapproval of core banking practicles |
Business Profile (incl. Management & governance); Financial Profile |
| Genera Issues | G Score | Sector-Specific Issues | Reference | G Relevance | How relevantare E. S and G Issues to the overall credit rating? |
|||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Management Strategy | ന | Operational implementation of strategy | Business Profile (incl. Management & governance) | 5 | 5 | Highly relevant, a key rating driver that has a significant impact on the rating on an individual basis . Equivalent to "higher" relative importance within Navigator. |
||||
| Governance Structure | Board independence and effectiveness; ownership /compliance risks; business continuity; key person risk; related party transactions |
concentration; protection of creditoristation rights; logal Business Profile (incl. Management & government), Easings . Profitability; Capitalisation & Leverage |
Relevant to rating, not a key rating driver but has an impact on the rating in combination with other factors. Equivalent to "moderate" relative importance within Navigator. |
|||||||
| Group Structure | Organizational structure; appropriateness relative to business model; opacity; intra-group dynamics; ownership |
Business Profile (incl. Management & governance) | 3 | 3 | Minimally relevant to rating, either very low impactor actively managed in a way that results in no impact on the entity rating. Equivalent to "lower" relative importance within Navigator. |
|||||
| Financial Transparency | Quality and frequency of financial reporting and auditing process se s |
Business Profile (incl. Management & governance) | 2 | 2 | Imele want to the entity rating but relevant to the sector. |
|||||
| Imelevant to the entity rating and irrelevant to the sector |
The highest level of ESG credit relevance is a score of '3', unless otherwise disclosed in this section. A score of '3' means ESG issues are credit neutral or have only a minimal credit impact on the entity, either due to their nature or the way in which they are being managed by the entity. Fitch's ESG Relevance Scores are not inputs in the rating process; they are an observation on the relevance and materiality of ESG factors in the rating decision. For more information on Fitch's ESG Relevance Scores, visit https://www.fitchratings.com/topics/esg/products#esg-relevance-scores.
For information on the solicitation status of the ratings included within this report, please refer to the solicitation status shown in the relevant entity's summary page of the Fitch Ratings website.
For information on the participation status in the rating process of an issuer listed in this report, please refer to the most recent rating action commentary for the relevant issuer, available on the Fitch Ratings website.
zxcvbnm729mnbvcxz481
All Fitch Ratings (Fitch) credit ratings are subject to certain limitations and disclaimers. Please read these limitations and disclaimers by following this link: https://www.fitchratings.com/understandingcreditratings. In addition, the following https://www.fitchratings.com/rating-definitions-document details Fitch's rating definitions for each rating scale and rating categories, including definitions relating to default. Published ratings, criteria, and methodologies are available from this site at all times. Fitch's code of conduct, confidentiality, conflicts of interest, affiliate firewall, compliance, and other relevant policies and procedures are also available from the Code of Conduct section of this site. Directors and shareholders' relevant interests are available at https://www.fitchratings.com/site/regulatory. Fitch may have provided another permissible or ancillary service to the rated entity or its related third parties. Details of permissible or ancillary service(s) for which the lead analyst is based in an ESMAor FCA-registered Fitch Ratings company (or branch of such a company) can be found on the entity summary page for this issuer on the Fitch Ratings website.
In issuing and maintaining its ratings and in making other reports (including forecast information), Fitch relies on factual information it receives from issuers and underwriters and from other sources Fitch believes to be credible. Fitch conducts a reasonable investigation of the factual information relied upon by it in accordance with its ratings methodology, and obtains reasonable verification of that information from independent sources, to the extent such sources are available for a given security or in a given jurisdiction. The manner of Fitch's factual investigation and the scope of the third-party verification it obtains will vary depending on the nature of the rated security and its issuer, the requirements and practices in the jurisdiction in which the rated security is offered and sold and/or the issuer is located, the availability and nature of relevant public information, access to the management of the issuer and its advisers, the availability of pre-existing third-party verifications such as audit reports, agreed-upon procedures letters, appraisals, actuarial reports, engineering reports, legal opinions and other reports provided by third parties, the availability of independent and competent third- party verification sources with respect to the particular security or in the particular jurisdiction of the issuer, and a variety of other factors. Users of Fitch's ratings and reports should understand that neither an enhanced factual investigation nor any third-party verification can ensure that all of the information Fitch relies on in connection with a rating or a report will be accurate and complete. Ultimately, the issuer and its advisers are responsible for the accuracy of the information they provide to Fitch and to the market in offering documents and other reports. In issuing its ratings and its reports, Fitch must rely on the work of experts, including independent auditors with respect to financial statements and attorneys with respect to legal and tax matters. Further, ratings and forecasts of financial and other information are inherently forward-looking and embody assumptions and predictions about future events that by their nature cannot be verified as facts. As a result, despite any verification of current facts, ratings and forecasts can be affected by future events or conditions that were not anticipated at the time a rating or forecast was issued or affirmed.
The information in this report is provided "as is" without any representation or warranty of any kind, and Fitch does not represent or warrant that the report or any of its contents will meet any of the requirements of a recipient of the report. A Fitch rating is an opinion as to the creditworthiness of a security. This opinion and reports made by Fitch are based on established criteria and methodologies that Fitch is continuously evaluating and updating. Therefore, ratings and reports are the collective work product of Fitch and no individual, or group of individuals, is solely responsible for a rating or a report. The rating does not address the risk of loss due to risks other than credit risk, unless such risk is specifically mentioned. Fitch is not engaged in the offer or sale of any security. All Fitch reports have shared authorship. Individuals identified in a Fitch report were involved in, but are not solely responsible for, the opinions stated therein. The individuals are named for contact purposes only. A report providing a Fitch rating is neither a prospectus nor a substitute for the information assembled, verified and presented to investors by the issuer and its agents in connection with the sale of the securities. Ratings may be changed or withdrawn at any time for any reason in the sole discretion of Fitch. Fitch does not provide investment advice of any sort. Ratings are not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. Ratings do not comment on the adequacy of market price, the suitability of any security for a particular investor, or the tax-exempt nature or taxability of payments made in respect to any security. Fitch receives fees from issuers, insurers, guarantors, other obligors, and underwriters for rating securities. Such fees generally vary from US\$1,000 to US\$750,000 (or the applicable currency equivalent) per issue. In certain cases, Fitch will rate all or a number of issues issued by a particular issuer, or insured or guaranteed by a particular insurer or guarantor, for a single annual fee. Such fees are expected to vary from US\$10,000 to US\$1,500,000 (or the applicable currency equivalent). The assignment, publication, or dissemination of a rating by Fitch shall not constitute a consent by Fitch to use its name as an expert in connection with any registration statement filed under the United States securities laws, the Financial Services and Markets Act of 2000 of the United Kingdom, or the securities laws of any particular jurisdiction. Due to the relative efficiency of electronic publishing and distribution, Fitch research may be available to electronic subscribers up to three days earlier than to print subscribers.
For Australia, New Zealand, Taiwan and South Korea only: Fitch Australia Pty Ltd holds an Australian financial services license (AFS license no. 337123) which authorizes it to provide credit ratings to wholesale clients only. Credit ratings information published by Fitch is not intended to be used by persons who are retail clients within the meaning of the Corporations Act 2001.
Fitch Ratings, Inc. is registered with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission as a Nationally Recognized Statistical Rating Organization (the "NRSRO"). While certain of the NRSRO's credit rating subsidiaries are listed on Item 3 of Form NRSRO and as such are authorized to issue credit ratings on behalf of the NRSRO (see https://www.fitchratings.com/site/regulatory), other credit rating subsidiaries are not listed on Form NRSRO (the "non-NRSROs") and therefore credit ratings issued by those subsidiaries are not issued on behalf of the NRSRO. However, non-NRSRO personnel may participate in determining credit ratings issued by or on behalf of the NRSRO.
Copyright © 2023 by Fitch Ratings, Inc., Fitch Ratings Ltd. and its subsidiaries. 33 Whitehall Street, NY, NY 10004. Telephone: 1-800-753-4824, (212) 908-0500. Fax: (212) 480- 4435. Reproduction or retransmission in whole or in part is prohibited except by permission. All rights reserved. z
Building tools?
Free accounts include 100 API calls/year for testing.
Have a question? We'll get back to you promptly.