Regulatory Filings • May 31, 2021
Regulatory Filings
Open in ViewerOpens in native device viewer
This English translation from the Hebrew version of the report (published on May 27th 2021) has been made for convenience and information purposes only. In case of any conflict or discrepancy between the terms of this English translation and the original version prepared in Hebrew, the Hebrew version shall prevail. The Company makes no representations as to the accuracy and reliability of the financial information in this English translation.

34 / 1

| Special Auditor's Report 3 |
|
|---|---|
| Overview and Disclosure Requirements |
5 |
| Definitions | 7 |
| Calculation Methodology 9 |
|
| Section 1 - Solvency Ratio and Minimum |
|
| Capital Requirement |
14 |
| Section 2 - Economic Balance Sheet |
16 |
| Section 2.A - Information about Economic Balance Sheet |
18 |
| Section 2.B - Composition of liabilities in respect to |
|
| insurance contracts and investment contracts |
24 |
| Section 3 - Own Funds in respect of SCR |
25 |
| Section 4 - Solvency Capital Requirement (SCR) |
27 |
| Section 5 - Minimum Capital Requirement (MCR) |
29 |
| Section 6 - Effect of Transitional Measures |
30 |
| Section 7 - Analysis of Sensitivity to Changes in Interest Rates |
31 |
| Section 8 - Dividend Distribution Restrictions |
32 |

Kost Forer Gabbay & Kasierer Tel. +972-3-6232525
Menachem Begin Road 144A, Tel Aviv 6492102
Fax +972-3-5622555
ey.com
To: The Board of Directors of The Phoenix Insurance Company Ltd.
We examined the capital required to maintain the solvency capital requirement (hereinafter - "SCR") and the economic capital of The Phoenix Insurance Company Ltd. of December 31 2020 (hereinafter – the "Information"), included in the Company's Solvency Report attached hereby and carries our office's seal for identification purposes (hereinafter - the "Report").
The Board of Directors and management bear the responsibility for the preparation and presentation of the Information drawn up in accordance with the directives of the Commissioner of the Capital Market, Insurance and Savings (hereinafter - the "Commissioner") regarding Solvency II-based Economic Solvency Requirement of an insurance company as included the Commissioner's circular No. 2020-1-15 of October 14 2020, and in accordance with the Commissioner's directives regarding principles for calculation of deduction during the transitional period in a Solvency IIbased Economic Solvency Regime of October 15 2020 (hereinafter - the "Directives").
The calculations, forecasts and assumptions on which the preparation of the Information was based fall under the responsibility of the Board of Directors and management.
We conducted our examination in accordance with International Standard on Assurance Engagements No. 3400 - The Examination of Prospective Financial Information, and in accordance with the Commissioner's Directives, as included in Appendix B of the Insurance Circular 2017-1- 20 of December 3 2017, which provides guidance as to audit of Economic Solvency Ratio Report.
We did not examine the appropriateness of the deduction during amount the transitional period as of December 31 2020 as presented in Section 2 to the Report, except for examination that the deduction amount does not exceed the expected discounted amount of the risk margin and the capital required for solvency in respect of life and health insurance risks arising from existing businesses during the transitional period in accordance with the pattern of future development of the required capital, which affects both the calculation of the expected capital release and the release of the expected risk margin as described in the provisions on calculation of risk margin.
Except for what is stated above in connection with the appropriateness of the deduction during the transitional period, based on the examination of the evidence supporting the calculations, the forecasts and the assumptions, as referred to below, which were used by the Company's Board of Directors and management in the preparation of the information nothing came to our attention which caused us to believe that the forecasts and assumptions, as a whole, do not constitute a reasonable basis for the information in accordance with the Directives. Furthermore, in our opinion, the information, including the method employed to determine the assumptions and forecasts, was prepared and presented in all material respects in accordance with the Directives.
Economic Solvency Ratio Report as of December 31, 2020
It should be emphasized that the projections and assumptions are based mainly on past experience, as arising from actuarial studies conducted from time to time. In view of the reforms in the capital market, insurance and savings, and the changes in the economic environment, past data do not necessarily reflect future results. The information is sometimes based on assumptions regarding future events, steps taken by management, and the pattern of the future development of the risk margin, that will not necessarily materialize or will materialize in a manner different than the assumptions used in the information. Furthermore, actual results may materially vary from the information, since the combined scenarios of events may materialize in a manner that is materially different than the assumptions made in the information.
We draw attention to what is stated in Section e - d comments and clarifications regarding the solvency ratio, the uncertainty derived from regulatory changes and exposure to contingent liabilities, the effect of which on the solvency ratio cannot be estimated.
Respectfully,
Tel Aviv, Kost Forer Gabbay & Kasierer May 26, 2021 Certified Public Accountants

The information provided below was calculated in accordance with the provisions of Circular 2020-1-15 of the Commissioner of the Capital Market, Insurance and Savings (hereinafter - the "Commissioner") - "Amendment to the Consolidated Circular concerning Implementation of a Solvency II-Based Economic Solvency Regime for Insurance Companies" (hereinafter - the "Economic Solvency Regime Directives"), was prepared and presented in accordance with Chapter 1, Part 4 Section 5 of the Consolidated Circular as recently revised in Circular 2020-1-17 (hereinafter - the "Disclosure Provisions").
The Economic Solvency Regime provisions set a standard model for calculating eligible capital and the regulatory solvency capital requirement, with the aim of bringing insurance companies to hold buffers to absorb losses arising from the materialization of unexpected risks to which they are exposed. The solvency ratio is the ratio between an insurance company's eligible capital to its regulatory solvency capital requirement.
The eligible capital is composed of Tier 1 Capital and Tier 2 Capital. Tier 1 Capital includes own funds calculated through assessing the value of an insurance company's assets and liabilities in accordance with the circular's provisions, and Additional Tier 1 Capital. Additional Tier 1 Capital and Tier 2 Capital include equity instruments with loss absorption mechanisms, including Subordinated Tier 2 Capital, Hybrid Tier 2 Capital and Tier 3 Capital, which were issued prior to the circular's effective date. The circular places restrictions on the composition of capital for SCR and MCR purposes (see below), such that the rate of components included in Tier 2 Capital shall not exceed 40% of the SCR without taking into account the transitional provisions and the equity scenario adjustment, and shall not exceed 50% of the SCR under the transitional provisions and taking into account the equity scenario adjustment.
The eligible capital is compared to the required capital and there are two levels of capital requirements:
The eligible capital and the required capital are calculated using data and models which are based, among other things, on forecasts and assumptions that rely mainly on past experience. These calculations are highly complex.
The Economic Solvency Regime Directives include, among other things, transitional provisions and adjustment for equity scenario, as follows:

The Company opted for the second alternative - of using the Deduction During the Transitional Period.
B. In addition to Section A above, the Economic Solvency Regime includes a reduced capital requirement, that will increase gradually until 2023, in respect of certain investment types.
The data included in this Economic Solvency Ratio Report, including the eligible and the required capital for solvency purposes are based, among other things, on forecasts, assessments, and estimates of future events, the materialization of which is uncertain and is not under the Company's control, and which should be considered as "forward-looking information" as the term is defined in Section 32A to the Securities Law, 1968. Actual results may differ from the results reflected in this Economic Solvency Ratio Report, if such forecasts, assessments and estimates, either in whole or in part, fail to materialize or materialize in a manner different than anticipated, including, among other things, with respect to actuarial assumptions (including mortality rates, morbidity rates, recovery rates, lapses, expenses, take up of pension benefits, rate of release of the risk margin and underwriting earnings rate), assumptions regarding future management actions, risk-free interest rates, capital market returns, future revenue, and damage in catastrophe scenarios.

| Company | - | The Phoenix Insurance Company Ltd. |
|---|---|---|
| The Economic Solvency | ||
| Regime Directives | - | The provisions of Circular 2020-1-15 of the Commissioner of the Capital Market, Insurance and Savings (hereinafter - the "Commissioner") - "Amendment to the Consolidated Circular concerning Implementation of a Solvency II-Based Economic Solvency Regime for Insurance Companies" (hereinafter - the "Solvency Circular"), including its explanations. |
| Best estimate | ||
| - | Expected future cash flow from insurance contracts and investment contracts throughout their term, without conservatism margins and discounted by an adjusted risk-free interest. |
|
| SLT health insurance | - | Health insurance that is conducted similarly to life insurance. |
| NSLT health insurance | - | Health insurance that is deemed to be written on a similar technical basis as property and casualty insurance (i.e. short term business) |
| Basic solvency capital | ||
| requirement (BSCR) | - | The capital required from an insurance company to maintain its solvency, calculated in accordance with the Economic Solvency Regime Directives, without taking into account the capital required due to operational risk, adjustment to loss absorption due to deferred tax and required capital due to management companies. |
| Solvency capital | ||
| requirement (SCR) | - | Total capital required from an insurance company to maintain its solvency, calculated in accordance with the Economic Solvency Regime Directives. |
| Recognized Own funds | ||
| - | Total Tier 1 Capital and Tier 2 Capital of an insurance company, after deductions and amortization in accordance with the provisions of Part B of the Appendix to the Solvency Circular. |
|
| Basic Tier 1 capital | - | Excess of assets over liabilities in the economic balance sheet, net of unrecognized assets and dividend declared subsequent to balance sheet date and until the report's initial publication date. |
| Additional Tier 1 capital | - | Perpetual capital note, non-cumulative preferred shares, Restricted Tier 1 capital instrument, Additional Tier 1 Capital instrument - valued in accordance with the provisions of Part A of the Appendix to the Solvency Circular. |
| Tier 2 capital | - | Tier 2 Capital instruments, Subordinated Tier 2 Capital, Additional Tier 1 Capital instrument that was not included in Tier 1 and Hybrid Tier 3 Capital - valued in accordance with the provisions of Part A of the Appendix to the Solvency Circular. |
| The Commissioner | - | Commissioner of the Capital Market, Insurance and Savings Authority. |
| Effect of diversification of risk components |
- | Effect of the partial correlation between different risks in the model on their amounts; the greater the diversification between operating segments in the portfolio and the |

diversification between risks, the greater is the effect of the correlation, which reduces the overall risk.
Solvency ratio - The ratio between the eligible equity of an insurance company and the solvency capital requirement.
Equity scenario
Deduction During the Transitional Period/ Transitional Measures on Technical Provisions/ TMTP - The amount deducted from insurance reserves during the Transitional Period, as described in Section 2a(2) above, and in accordance with the Economic Solvency Regime Directives.
Transitional Period - Under the transitional provisions for the implementation of an Economic Solvency Regime - a period running until December 31 2032.
Audited - The term refers to an audit held in accordance International Standard on Assurance Engagement (ISAE) 3400 – "The Examination of Prospective Financial Information." Investment Rules Regulations - Supervision of Financial Services Regulations (Provident Funds) (Investment Rules Applicable to Institutional Entities), 2012.

The Economic Solvency Ratio Report as of December 31 2020 and December 31 2019 was calculated and prepared in accordance with the Economic Solvency Regime Directives.
The economic balance sheet is calculated in accordance with the detailed rules and directives published by the Commissioner, which are based on the European Solvency II rules, with adjustments to reflect the characteristics of the economic environment and products in Israel. The purpose of the rules is to reflect the economic value of the balance sheet items in accordance with the Commissioner's approach. In accordance with the Directives, the insurance liabilities are calculated based on the best estimate of all expected future cash flows from existing businesses, without conservatism margins and plus a risk margin, which represents the addition to the insurance liabilities that is expected to be required from another insurance company to assume the insurance company's insurance liabilities. In accordance with the Directives, the risk margin is calculated using the cost of capital method, at a rate of 6% per year of the expected required capital in respect of insurance risks over the life of the existing businesses as described below. The economic balance sheet is prepared based on the Company's standalone financial statements plus investees, whose main occupation is holding rights in real estate. The economic balance sheet does not include the economic value of the provident funds and pension funds activities held by the insurance company and assumes zero value of intangible assets and deferred acquisition costs.
As aforesaid, the Company opted for the TMTP alternative provided by the transitional provisions, whereby the economic capital may be increased by gradually deducting from the insurance reserves until 2032. With regard to the Deduction During the Transitional Period, a letter was addressed to insurance companies managers titled "Principles for calculating Deduction During the Transitional Period in the Solvency II-based Economic Solvency Regime" (hereinafter - the "Letter of Principles"). Pursuant to the Letter of Principles, the Deduction During the Transitional Period shall be calculated by dividing insurance policies issued through December 31 2016 into homogeneous risk groups. The aforesaid deduction shall be calculated as the difference between insurance reserves (retention) as per the economic balance sheet including the risk margin attributed thereto (without adjusting the fair value of designated bonds) and the insurance reserves (retention) as per the Financial Statements. This difference shall be deducted on a linear basis until December 31 2032.
The Company should ensure that the deduction balance at each reporting date (hereinafter - the "Deduction Value During the Transitional Period") shall be proportionate to the expected increase in the solvency ratio calculated excluding the Transitional Measures.
The Deduction During the Transitional Period shall be recalculated in subsequent periods in the following instances:

In March 2020, the Commissioner published an amendment to the provisions of the Consolidated Circular regarding the Liability Adequacy Testing (hereinafter - the "LAT Circular"). The amendment included changes in the way insurance liabilities are calculated as part of the Liability Adequacy Test (LAT), and determined that these changes would apply from the financial statements as of March 31 2020 as a change in accounting policies by way of retrospective application. In accordance with the Commissioner's Directives, the said amendment is not reflected in the calculation of the Deduction During the Transitional Period as of December 31 2019 and is not reflected in the Balance sheet according to accounting standards shown in section 2 below.
In March 2021, the Commissioner published a clarification in connection with this issue, stipulating that the calculation of the LAT Circular's effect on the Deduction During the Transitional Period as of December 31 2020 shall be carried out retrospectively, as follows:
The Deduction During the Transitional Period will be calculated as of December 31 2019 using the same method as the one used to calculate the Solvency Report for that date; the accounting-based insurance liabilities include the effect of the LAT Circular, and the economic-based insurance liabilities (best estimate plus risk margin) and added fair value of the designated bonds include the effect derived therefrom. The Deduction During the Transitional Period as of December 31 2020 shall be based on the Deduction During the Transitional Period that was calculated retrospectively and will be deducted as described above. For further details as to the effect of this change, see Section 1a below.
The calculation of the solvency capital requirement is based on an assessment of the economic capital's exposure to the following risk components set in the Economic Solvency Regime: life insurance risks, health insurance risks, property and casualty insurance risks, market risks and counter-party default risks. These risk components include sub-risk components with respect to specific risks to which the insurance company is exposed. The exposure assessment of the economic equity to each sub-risk component is carried out based on a defined scenario set out in the guidance. The determination of the solvency capital requirement is based on the sum of the capital requirements in respect of the risk components and the sub-risk components, as stated above, net of the effect of the diversification between the risks in the Company in accordance with the correlations assigned to them under the Directives, and net of an adjustment for loss-absorption due to deferred tax, as set out below. Furthermore, the calculation of the solvency capital requirement includes components of capital required in respect of operational risk and in respect of management companies.
The capital requirement in respect of each of the risks is calculated in accordance with the Company's exposure to that risk, taking into account the parameters set in the Directives. In accordance with the Directives, the amount of the required capital represents the scope of capital that will allow the insurance company to absorb unexpected losses in the forthcoming year and meet its obligations to policyholders and beneficiaries on time, with a 99.5% certainty level.

In accordance with the Economic Solvency Regime Directives, an insurance company may recognize a loss absorption adjustment with respect to deferred tax assets up to the amount of the balance of the deferred tax reserve included in the economic balance sheet plus a tax asset against future profits up to 5% of the basic solvency capital requirement (BSCR), provided that the following conditions are met:

The economic solvency ratio report includes, among other things, forecasts based on assumptions and parameters based on past experience, as they arise from actuarial studies conducted from time to time, and on Company's assessments regarding the future, to the extent that it has relevant and concrete information which can be relied upon. The information and studies are similar to those used as the basis for the Company's annual 2020 report. Any information or studies obtained or completed after the Company's 2020 annual report publication date were not taken into account.
It should be emphasized that in view of the reforms in the capital, insurance and savings market and the changes in the economic environment, past data are not necessarily indicative of future results, and the Company is unable to reliably assess the effect of the reform and the changes. The calculation is sometimes based on assumptions regarding future events and steps taken by management, that will not necessarily materialize or will materialize in a manner different than the assumptions used in the calculation. Furthermore, actual results may materially vary from the calculation, since the combined scenarios of events may materialize in a manner that is materially different than the assumptions made in the calculation.
The model, in its present form, is highly sensitive to changes in market variable and other variables; therefore, the status of capital reflected therefrom may be very volatile.
a) The field of insurance has been subject to frequent changes in relevant legislation and regulatory directives. For further details, see Sections 2.1.2 and 2.3.1 in Part B and Section 4.1 in Part D of the Description of the Corporation Business chapter in the 2020 Periodic Report.
Legislation and regulatory measures impact the Company's profits and cash flows and consequently also its economic solvency ratio.
The calculation of the solvency ratio does not reflect all potential effects of the aforesaid legislation and regulatory measures and of other developments that are not yet reflected in practice in the data; this is since to date the Company is unable to assess their entire effect on its business results and solvency ratio.
b) In accordance with the Economic Solvency Regime Directives, the value of contingent liabilities in the economic balance sheet is determined based on their value in the accounting balance sheet in accordance with the provisions of IAS 37; this measurement does not reflect their economic value. It is not possible to assess the effect of the uncertainty arising from the exposure to contingent liabilities, including such exposure's effect on the Company's future profits and economic solvency ratio. For further information regarding the exposure to contingent liabilities, please see Note 39 to the financial statements as at December 31 2020. For an update as to developments in this exposure after reporting date, see Note 7 to the financial statements as of March 31 2021.

c) On May 13 2021, the Commissioner published a revised version of the Q&A file regarding the application and disclosure of Economic Solvency Regime of insurance companies (hereinafter - the "Q&A File"). The Q&A File provides a clarification as to the contract boundary in savings policies without a guaranteed conversion factor which were marketed after 2013. The clarification stipulates that the contract's boundary is the date on which the guaranteed conversion factor is secured; furthermore, it was noted that for the calculation as of December 31 2020 it is possible to continue using the contract's boundary that was used by the Company in its calculation for these policies as of December 31 2019. This clarification was not yet implemented in the current report and its implementationis expected to cause a non-material decrease the Company's economic solvency ratio.

| As of December 31 | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 | 2019 | ||
| Audited | |||
| In NIS thousand | |||
| Own Funds in respect of SCR - please see Section 3 Solvency capital requirement (SCR) - please see Section 4 |
12,770,842 6,661,640 |
12,086,505 7,455,885 |
|
| Surplus | 6,109,203 | 4,630,620 | |
| Economic solvency ratio (in %) | 192% | 162% |
| Economic solvency ratio (in %) | 192% | 165% |
|---|---|---|
| Surplus | 6,109,203 | 4,850,620 |
| Total Own Funds in respect of SCR | 12,770,842 | 12,306,505 |
| Raising of own funds | - | 220,000 |
* The term refers to an audit held in accordance International Standard on Assurance Engagement (ISAE) 3400 – "The Examination of Prospective Financial Information."

| As of December 31 | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 | 2019 | ||
| Audited | |||
| In NIS thousand | |||
| Minimum capital requirement (MCR) - see Section 5.A | 1,665,410 | 1,863,971 | |
| Own Funds for MCR - please see Section 5.B | 9,773,104 | 8,919,336 |

| As of December 31 | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Information about economic balance sheet |
2020 | 2019 | ||||
| Balance sheet according to accounting standards |
Economic balance sheet |
Balance sheet according to accounting standards |
Economic balance sheet |
|||
| Audited | ||||||
| In NIS thousand | ||||||
| Assets | ||||||
| Intangible assets | 3 | 718,735 | - | 692,345 | - | |
| Deferred acquisition costs | 4 | 1,431,579 | - | 1,486,891 | - | |
| Property, plant & equipment | 720,269 | 720,269 | 624,348 | 624,348 | ||
| Investments in investees that are not insurance companies |
||||||
| Management companies | 5 | 642,402 | 229,233 | 625,797 | 247,135 | |
| Other investees | 5 | 503,127 | 481,831 | 484,843 | 466,288 | |
| Total investments in investees that are not insurance companies |
1,145,529 | 711,064 | 1,110,640 | 713,423 | ||
| Investment property in respect of yield-dependent contracts |
1,839,576 | 1,839,576 | 1,554,065 | 1,554,065 | ||
| Investment property - other | 2,728,710 | 2,728,710 | 2,547,356 | 2,547,356 | ||
| Reinsurance assets | 1 | 2,531,660 | 2,113,529 | 2,347,721 | 2,170,939 | |
| Receivables and debit balances | 10 | 1,055,024 | 949,619 | 1,010,520 | 1,010,520 | |
| Financial investments in respect of yield-dependent contracts |
65,570,447 | 65,570,447 | 64,304,915 | 64,304,915 | ||
| Other financial investments | ||||||
| Marketable debt assets | 7,993,914 | 7,993,914 | 7,742,370 | 7,742,370 | ||
| Non-marketable debt assets, excluding designated bonds. |
6 | 4,979,180 | 5,294,740 | 4,583,938 | 4,982,991 | |
| Designated bonds | 7 | 7,369,589 | 10,250,891 | 7,246,299 | 10,235,938 | |
| Shares | 1,851,347 | 1,851,347 | 1,520,099 | 1,520,099 | ||
| Other | 3,166,061 | 3,166,061 | 2,131,610 | 2,131,610 | ||
| Total other financial investments |
25,360,091 | 28,556,953 | 23,224,316 | 26,613,008 | ||
| Cash and cash equivalents in respect of yield-dependent contracts |
10,464,216 | 10,464,216 | 5,612,435 | 5,612,435 | ||
| Other cash and cash equivalents | 943,183 | 943,183 | 1,357,883 | 1,357,883 | ||
| Other assets | 196 | 196 | 335,058 | 335,058 | ||
| Total assets | 114,509,215 | 114,597,762 | 106,208,493 | 106,843,950 | ||
| Total assets in respect of yield dependent contracts |
78,034,084 | 78,148,171 | 71,662,076 | 71,765,970 | ||
| EQUITY | ||||||
| Basic Tier 1 capital | 6,191,958 | 8,754,738 | 4,877,009 | 7,855,814 | ||
| Total equity | 6,191,958 | 8,754,738 | 4,877,009 | 7,855,814 |

| As of December 31 | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 | 2019 | |||||
| Information about economic balance sheet |
Balance sheet according to accounting standards |
Economic balance sheet |
Balance sheet according to accounting standards |
Economic balance sheet |
||
| Audited | ||||||
| In NIS thousand | ||||||
| Liabilities | ||||||
| Liabilities in respect of insurance contracts and non-yield-dependent investment contracts - see Section 2B |
1, 8 | 22,619,606 | 17,486,165 | 22,710,165 | 17,309,370 | |
| Liabilities in respect of insurance contracts and yield-dependent investment contracts - see Section 2.B |
1, 8 | 76,912,239 | 74,813,744 | 71,132,337 | 68,836,613 | |
| Risk margin (RM) | 1 | - | 7,516,682 | - | 7,918,800 | |
| Deduction During the Transitional Period |
2 | - | (4,455,219) | - | (4,444,588) | |
| Liabilities in respect of deferred taxes, net |
9 | 783,599 | 2,344,248 | 623,967 | 2,381,244 | |
| Payables and credit balances | 4,10 | 2,255,326 | 2,131,341 | 1,930,402 | 1,809,740 | |
| Financial liabilities | 11 | 5,746,487 | 6,006,064 | 4,934,613 | 5,176,957 | |
| Total liabilities | 108,317,257 | 105,843,024 | 101,331,484 | 98,988,136 | ||
| Total equity and liabilities | 114,509,215 | 114,597,762 | 106,208,493 | 106,843,950 |
For further changes in Tier 1 Capital see section 3 below. For further details about changes in the Deduction During the Transitional Period and about other significant effects on the economic solvency ratio's components, see Section 1 above.

The fair value of assets and liabilities in the economic balance sheet was calculated in accordance with the provisions included in the chapter dealing with measurement of assets and liabilities for financial statements purposes in the Consolidated Circular (Regulation Codex), except for items for which other provisions apply as per the Solvency Circular, as follows:
Liabilities in respect of insurance contracts and investment contracts are calculated in accordance with Part A Chapter 4 of the Solvency Circular based on a best estimate (hereafter - "BE" or "Best Estimate") on the basis of assumptions that are mainly a result of projecting to the future existing experience relating to past events, within the environment in which the Company operates, and without conservatism factors. As a rule, with respect to life and Health SLT liabilities, the Company applied the embedded value (EV) calculation methodology in Israel, and with respect to property and casualty insurance - on the basis of the section in the Commissioner Position entitled "Best Practice for Calculation of Insurance Reserves in Property and Casualty Insurance for Financial Reporting Purposes."
The calculation of the liabilities in respect of life insurance contracts and long term health insurance (SLT) contracts was carried out by discounting the Company's projected cash flows using a model applied to information available in the Company's operational systems as to insurance coverages, and to many demographic, economic and behavioral assumptions. The projected cash flows include, for example, projected premiums in view of the expected lapse rates, net of the expenses that the Company will incur in respect of the coverages, including fees and commissions to agents, expected claims, etc.
This cash flow is discounted based on an interest-rate curve set by the Commissioner which is based on the yield to maturity of bonds of the Government of Israel ("risk-free interest"), with convergence in the long-term to a fixed rate of 2.6% (UFR) plus a margin (VA) that was set by the Commissioner.
The calculation of the liabilities does not include cash flows in respect of future sales; however, it does include an assumption that the Company will continue receiving premiums from existing businesses (excluding in respect of policies without an insurance risk, including investment contracts). Furthermore, the calculation assumes that the Company shall continue as a going concern, i.e., that the Company's activity will not change, and therefore, some of the fixed expenses in the future shall not be allocated to the current portfolio, but rather to a new business which is expected to be sold in the future.
It is likely that the actual cash flows will vary to some degree from the estimates made on a best estimate basis, even if the underlying parameters of the calculation will not change in any way. See also Section d1 above comments and clarifications.
As stated above, the measurement of the insurance liabilities in the economic balance sheet is carried out by discounting the projected cash flows, including future profit, by a risk-free interest plus VA and taking the UFR into consideration, on the basis of a best estimate that does not include conservatism margins, where the risk is reflected in the RM component, which is a separate liability. This measurement differs from the measurement applied in the financial statements, where insurance liabilities are estimated with conservatism margins using the discounting methods and rates described in Note 37 to the 2020 financial statements.

Risk margin - In addition to the insurance liabilities based on an optimal assessment, a component of the risk margin is calculated which reflects the total cost of capital that another insurance company would be expected to require in order to receive the insurance company's total insurance liabilities, calculated on the basis of an optimal assessment. The risk margin is calculated in accordance with the Commissioner's Directives, based on a capital cost rate of 6%, and is discounted at an adjusted risk-free interest rate, but excluding the VA component and based on current and future capital requirements. The future capital requirement is calculated in accordance with the "risk factor method", by changing the capital requirement components calculated as of the reporting date in accordance with the projected development of the risk factors attributed thereto. These factors are designed to reflect the development of the standard model risks over time. The calculation does not take into account the capital requirement in respect of market risks.
The risk margin is calculated using the cost of capital method, at a rate of 6% per year of the expected required capital in respect of insurance risks over the life of the existing businesses. This calculation method was defined by the Commissioner and does not necessarily reflect the overall cost of capital that is expected to be required from another insurance company or reinsurer in order to assume the Company's insurance liabilities.
In that context, it should be emphasized that the stress scenario calculated as part of the Economic Solvency Regime (capital requirements) are based on a set of scenarios and assumptions defined by the Commissioner, and which do not reflect any actual experience of the Company

The calculation's underlying assumptions were set in accordance with the Company's best estimates of relevant demographic and operational factors, and reflect the Company's expectations as to the future in respect of these factors. The demographic assumptions included in the calculation were taken from Company's internal studies, if any, and are based on relevant experience and/or the integration of information received from external sources, such as information from reinsurers and mortality and morbidity tables published by the Commissioner.
The operational assumptions (general and administrative expenses) were calculated in accordance with the results of the Company's internal pricing model applied to expenses relating to the relevant insurance liabilities, including: allocation of expenses to the different segments and activities (issuance, current management, investments, claims management, etc.) and assumptions regarding their future development (in accordance with the CPI, scope of premiums and assets, etc.).
General and administrative expenses - the Company analyzed the expenses allocated in the financial statements to the relevant insurance segments, and allocated them to various products and coverage types and to various activities such as current operating of the coverages, investment management, handling claims, payment of pensions and more. The expenses study is revised periodically and the different types of expenses are carried to the future cash flow in relation to the relevant factors, such as the number of coverages, premiums, reserves or claims. The determination of the future expense and their allocation to future cash flows include many assessments and judgments by the Company, which affect the amount of the liabilities.

The estimate of the insurance liabilities in the different subsegments in respect of earned premium is based on the provision for the December 2020 balance sheet. The estimate includes Unallocated Loss Adjustment Expenses (ULAE) and does not include RM and other non-specific margins that were taken into account for reserve adequacy testing for the said balance sheet.
In respect of the unearned portion, the cost is based on the balance sheet calculation, taking into account the unearned portion of the contingent claims; (these are also deducted from risk margins and other nonspecific margins).
The Deduction During the Transitional Period (hereinafter - the "Deduction") was calculated in accordance with the provisions included in the Economic Solvency Regime and in the letter to insurance companies managers: "Principles for Calculating Deduction During the Transitional Period in the Solvency II-based Economic Solvency Regime" of October 15 2020 (hereinafter - the "Letter of Principles").
The Deduction, which amounted to NIS 4,445 million as of December 31 2019 and to NIS 4,455 million as of December 31 2020 after an amortization of one year plus the effect of the implementation of the LAT Circular (as described in Section 1a above) was calculated as the amount of the positive differences between insurance reserves (retention) as per the economic balance sheet including the risk margin including the RM (net of fair value adjustment of the designated bonds) and the insurance reserves (retention) as per the financial statements as of December 31 2019. These differences were calculated at product group level in accordance with the provisions included in the Letter of Principles.
In accordance with the Letter of Principles, the Company assessed the need to reduce the Deduction Value during the Transitional Period to reflect the expected increase in the solvency ratio, calculated without the Deduction During the Transitional Period and the equity scenario adjustment. The Company carried out an assessment in accordance with the transitional provision included in the Letter of Principles, whereby an insurance company may consider reducing the Deduction Value during the Transitional Period based on the expected release of the discounted risk margin and capital required for solvency in respect of life insurance and SLT health insurance risks in respect of existing businesses during the Transitional Period (hereinafter - the "Release"), provided that the Company meets certain conditions as set out in the Letter of Principles. Furthermore, the Company assessed the need to reduce the Deduction Value during the Transitional Period based on a model for forecasting the economic solvency ratio, as developed in the Company in accordance with generally accepted practices.
Accordingly, the Company concluded that there is no need to reduce the Deduction Value during the Transitional Period as of December 31 2020.
It should be noted that the Company is required to recalculate the Deduction During the Transitional Period in the following cases:

Following such recalculation, the amount of the Deduction During the Transitional Period may be reduced.
The Company obtained the Commissioner's approval to include the full amount of the Deduction During the Transitional Period in its calculation of the solvency ratio as of December 31 2019. The amount of Deduction During the Transitional Period in the future is subject to changes in the above assumptions, business developments and obtaining a periodic approval from the Commissioner.
The economic value of the investees does not include the profits implicit in those companies.
In the management company, 35% of the balance of the original difference relating to this company is added to the economic value.

IAS 12. Deferred taxes may be recognized only if the Company shall meet the criteria included in the Economic Solvency Regime, in addition to the criteria included in the above-mentioned accounting standard.

| As of December 31 2020 Best estimate (BE) of liabilities |
|||
|---|---|---|---|
| Gross | Reinsurance | Retention | |
| Audited | |||
| In NIS thousand | |||
| Liabilities in respect of insurance contracts and non yield-dependent investment contracts |
|||
| Life insurance contracts and long term health insurance (SLT) | 12,252,737 | 362,877 | 11,889,859 |
| Property & casualty and NSLT health insurance contracts | 5,233,428 | 1,514,126 | 3,719,302 |
| Total liabilities for insurance contracts and non-yield dependent investment contracts |
17,486,165 | 1,877,004 | 15,609,161 |
| Liabilities in respect of insurance contracts and yield-dependent investment contracts - life insurance contracts and long term health insurance (SLT) |
74,813,744 | 236,525 | 74,577,219 |
| Total liabilities in respect of insurance contracts and investment contracts |
92,299,909 | 2,113,529 | 90,186,380 |
| As of December 31 2019 Best estimate (BE) of liabilities |
|||
|---|---|---|---|
| Gross | Reinsurance | Retention | |
| Audited | |||
| In NIS thousand | |||
| Liabilities in respect of insurance contracts and non yield-dependent investment contracts |
|||
| Life insurance contracts and long term health insurance (SLT) | 11,962,693 | 443,200 | 11,519,493 |
| Property & casualty and NSLT health insurance contracts | 5,346,677 | 1,513,771 | 3,832,906 |
| Total liabilities for insurance contracts and non-yield dependent investment contracts |
17,309,370 | 1,956,971 | 15,352,399 |
| Liabilities in respect of insurance contracts and yield-dependent investment contracts - life insurance contracts and long term health insurance (SLT) |
68,836,613 | 213,967 | 68,622,646 |
| Total liabilities in respect of insurance contracts and investment contracts |
86,145,983 | 2,170,938 | 83,975,045 |
Most of the increase in the total of liabilities in respect of insurance and investment contracts during 2020 stems from positive yields and current contributions into planholders' portfolios in respect of yield-dependent insurance and investment contracts.

| As of December 31 2020 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tier 1 capital | ||||
| Basic | Additional | Tier 2 capital | Total | |
| Audited | ||||
| In NIS thousand | ||||
| Equity capital | 8,754,738 | 905,714 | 3,582,290 | 13,242,742 |
| Deductions from Tier 1 capital (a) | (220,430) | - | - | (220,430) |
| Deductions (b) | - | - | - | - |
| Deviation from quantitative limitations (c) | - | - | (251,470) | (251,470) |
| Own Funds in respect of SCR (d) | 8,534,308 | 905,714 | 3,330,820 | 12,770,842 |
| Out of which - expected profit amount in respect of future premiums Post-tax EPIFP |
5,918,943 | 5,918,943 |
| As of December 31 2019 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tier 1 capital | ||||
| Basic | Additional | Tier 2 capital | Total | |
| Audited | ||||
| In NIS thousand | ||||
| Equity capital | 7,855,814 | 709,692 | 3,539,963 | 12,105,469 |
| Deductions from Tier 1 capital (a) | (18,964) | - | - | (18,964) |
| Deductions (b) | - | - | - | - |
| Deviation from quantitative limitations (c) | - | - | - | - |
| Own Funds in respect of SCR (d) | 7,836,850 | 709,692 | 3,539,963 | 12,086,505 |
| Out of which - expected profit amount in respect of future premiums |
||||
| Post-tax EPIFP | 5,936,821 | 5,936,821 |
The Tier 1 Capital was positively affected by positive yields that were higher than the discount rate in the planholders' portfolios and nostro portfolio during the reporting year, sales of a new business, expiry of underwriting capital requirements for an existing business (which reduces the RM component), studies and updating of parameters in the actuarial model and expense model. These effects were partially offset by the adverse effect of a decrease in the risk-free interest rate curve (in the medium to long term) as well as deviations from operating and demographic assumptions. The aggregate amount of those changes caused an approximately NIS 1 billion increase in the Company's Tier 1 Capital. According to the Economic Solvency Regime Directives, as of December 31 2020, a NIS 200 dividend - which was declared and distributed subsequent to the report date - was deducted from the Tier 1 capital.

| As of December 31 | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 | 2019 | ||
| Audited | |||
| In NIS thousand | |||
| Tier 1 capital | |||
| Basic Tier 1 capital | 8,534,308 | 7,836,850 | |
| Additional Tier 1 capital | |||
| Additional Tier 1 capital instruments | 905,714 | 709,692 | |
| Restricted Tier 1 capital instruments | - | - | |
| Less deduction due to deviation from quantitative limit | - | - | |
| Additional Tier 1 capital | 905,714 | 709,692 | |
| Total Tier 1 capital | 9,440,022 | 8,546,542 | |
| Tier 2 capital | |||
| Tier 2 capital instruments | 1,466,420 | 1,430,875 | |
| Restricted Tier 2 capital instruments | 1,687,761 | 1,679,901 | |
| Restricted Tier 3 capital instruments | 428,109 | 429,187 | |
| Less deduction due to deviation from quantitative limit | (251,470) | - | |
| Total Tier 2 capital | 3,330,820 | 3,539,963 | |
| Total own funds in respect of SCR | 12,770,842 | 12,086,505 |

| As of December 31 | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2020 | 2019 | |
| Capital requirements Audited |
||
| In NIS thousand | ||
| Basic solvency capital requirement (BSCR) | ||
| Capital required in respect of market risk component* | 3,674,610 | 3,479,504 |
| Capital required in respect of counterparty risk component | 401,319 | 368,366 |
| Capital required in respect of underwriting risk component in life insurance | 2,985,997 | 3,456,963 |
| Required capital in respect of underwriting risk component in health insurance (SLT+NSLT) |
5,370,929 | 5,627,919 |
| Capital required in respect of underwriting risk component in P&C insurance | 1,089,137 | 1,105,217 |
| Effect of diversification of risk components | (4,530,968) | (4,696,538) |
| Total basic solvency capital requirement (BSCR) | 8,991,024 | 9,341,432 |
| Capital required in respect of operational risk | 350,192 | 392,692 |
| Loss absorption adjustment due to deferred tax asset | (2,793,799) | (2,376,483) |
| Capital required in respect of management companies: | ||
| Phoenix Excellence Pension and Provident Funds Ltd. | 114,222 | 98,244 |
| Total capital required in respect of management companies: | 114,222 | 98,244 |
| Total solvency capital requirement (SCR) | 6,661,640 | 7,455,885 |
* equity scenario adjustment.
For information about capital requirements without Transitional measures, see Section 6 "Effect of application of Directives for the Transitional Period", below

all material considerations that will affect the company's tax credit or debit should be taken into account - including the relevant tax base, the corporate structure and the timing on which losses or gains arose, against which the recorded loss can be offset for tax purposes. Among other things, the following should be taken into account: the rules for offsetting payroll tax, the probability that the losses included in the scenario will be reflected in the tax return and expected tax rates for losses that will be recognized for tax purposes only on disposal of assets. To the extent that there is no reason to assume that the tax rate in calculating the loss absorption adjustment due to deferred tax asset is substantially different from the tax rate for calculating the net tax reserve in an economic balance sheet, it can be assumed - for the sake of practicality - that the rates are identical. The Company considered the implications of the clarification. The increase in the loss absorption adjustment due to deferred tax asset stemmed mainly from Company's estimate as to the amount of deferred tax asset that may be utilized, which caused a decrease is the SCR.

| As of December 31 | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2020 | 2019 | |
| Audited In NIS thousand |
||
| Minimum capital requirement according to MCR formula | 1,578,250 | (*) 1,540,972 |
| Lower boundary (25% of solvency capital requirement in the Transitional Period) |
1,665,410 | 1,863,971 |
| Upper boundary (45% of solvency capital requirement in the Transitional Period) |
2,997,738 | 3,355,148 |
| Minimum capital requirement (MCR) | 1,665,410 | 1,863,971 |
(*) Represented
| As of December 31 2020 | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Tier 1 capital | Tier 2 capital | Total | |
| Audited | |||
| In NIS thousand | |||
| Own funds in respect of SCR according to Section 3 | 9,440,022 | 3,330,820 | 12,770,842 |
| Deviation from quantitative limitations due to minimum capital requirement* |
- | (2,997,738) | (2,997,738) |
| Own funds for MCR | 9,440,022 | 333,082 | 9,773,104 |
| As of December 31 2019 | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Tier 1 capital | Tier 2 capital | Total | |
| Audited | |||
| In NIS thousand | |||
| Own funds in respect of SCR according to Section 3 | 8,546,542 | 3,539,963 | 12,086,505 |
| Deviation from quantitative limitations due to minimum capital requirement* |
- | (3,167,169) | (3,167,169) |
| Own funds for MCR | 8,546,542 | 372,794 | 8,919,336 |
(*) In accordance with the provisions of Chapter 3 in Part B to the Economic Solvency Regime Appendix, Tier 2 Capital shall not exceed 20% of MCR.

| As of December 31 2020 | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Including applying the TMTP and adjustment of the equity scenario |
Effect of TMTP | Effect of equity scenario adjustment Audited |
Effect of a 50% rate Tier 2 capital during the Transitional Period |
Total excluding applying the TMTP and adjustment of the equity scenario |
|
| In NIS thousand | |||||
| Total insurance liabilities, including risk margin (RM) |
95,361,372 | (4,455,219) | - | - | 99,816,591 |
| Basic Tier 1 capital | 8,534,308 | 2,931,980 | - | - | 5,602,328 |
| Own funds in respect of SCR |
12,770,842 | 2,680,509 | - | 159,326 | 9,931,007 |
| Solvency capital requirement (SCR) |
6,661,640 | (1,523,239) | (372,526) | - | 8,557,405 |
See description of the transitional provisions applicable to the Company during the Transitional Period in Section 2a information about economic balance sheet, Subsection 2- the value of the Deduction During the Transitional Period as of December 31 2020.
| As of December 31 2019 | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Including applying the TMTP and adjustment to the equity scenario |
Effect of Deduction During the Transitional Period |
Effect of equity scenario adjustment Audited |
Effect of a 50% rate Tier 2 capital during the Transitional Period |
Total excluding applying the TMTP and adjustment to the equity scenario |
|
| In NIS thousand | |||||
| Total insurance liabilities, including risk margin (RM) |
89,620,195 | (4,444,588) | - | - | 94,064,783 |
| Basic Tier 1 capital | 7,836,850 | 2,924,983 | - | - | 4,911,867 |
| Own funds in respect of SCR Solvency capital |
12,086,505 | 2,924,983 | - | - | 9,161,522 |
| requirement (SCR) | 7,455,885 | (1,027,001) | (413,669) | - | 8,896,554 |
For an explanation on key changes compared to last year, including a reference to the effect of the implementation of the LAT Circular on the Deduction amount, see Section 1a above.

Set forth below is a sensitivity analysis of the economic solvency ratio to changes in interest as of the report date (under the transitional provisions and a equity scenario adjustment). This analysis reflects the effects of the changes on own funds, including the quantitative restrictions that apply to own funds, and on the capital required for solvency purposes. The sensitivity test only reflects direct effects, holding all other risk factors constant, and do not include secondary effects or derived changes on other risk factors.
It should be noted that the sensitivities are not necessarily linear; i.e., sensitivity at other rates is not necessarily a simple extrapolation of the sensitivity test presented.
| As of December 31 2020 | |
|---|---|
| Effect on the economic solvency ratio (in %) |
|
| A 50-base-point decrease in risk-free interest | (13%) |
As part of the sensitivity calculation, a new risk-free interest curve was created representing a 50-base-points decrease up to the Last Liquid Point, beyond which the Smith-Wilson extrapolation was implemented with the UFR remaining constant in accordance with the Economic Solvency Regime methodology.
A recalculation of an economic balance sheet was carried out which took into account the effect of the new interest rate curve on all assets and liabilities affected by changes in interest (both yield-dependent ones and non-yield dependent ones). Furthermore, the Company took into account the effect of changes in interest on capital requirements in assets and liabilities and on the risk margin. It should be noted that the sensitivity didn't take into account changes in the amount of the Deduction During the Transitional Period.

The Company's policy is to have a solid capital base to ensure its solvency and ability to meet its liabilities to policyholders, to preserve the Company's ability to continue its business activity such that it is able to provide returns to its shareholders. The Company is subject to capital requirements set by the Commissioner.
On October 27 2020, the Company's Board of Directors set a minimum economic solvency ratio target and target range based on Solvency II. The minimum economic solvency ratio target, taking into account the transitional provisions, is set at 135% while the minimum solvency ratio target without taking into account the provisions during the Transitional Period is set at 105%1 set to reach 135% at the end of the Transitional Period according to the Company's capital plan.
Furthermore, The Company's Board of Directors approved an economic solvency ratio target range of 150%-170%, within which the Company aspires to be during and at the end of the Transitional Period, taking into account the Deduction During the Transitional Period and its gradual reduction.
As of December 31 2020, the date of the last calculation, the Company meets the set targets. It is hereby clarified that the aforesaid does not guarantee that the Company will meet the set targets at all times.
According to the letter published by the Commissioner, in October 2017, (hereinafter - the "Letter") an insurance company shall be entitled to distribute a dividend only if, following the distribution, the company has a solvency ratio according to the Economic Solvency Regime - of at least 100%, calculated without taking into account the transitional provisions and subject to the solvency ratio target set by the Company's Board of Directors. The aforesaid ratio shall be calculated without the relief granted in respect of the original difference attributed to the acquisition of the provident funds and management companies. In addition, the letter set out provisions for reporting to the Commissioner.
During the first quarter of 2021, The Phoenix Insurance distributed a dividend in the amount of NIS 200 million, in accordance with the audited results as of December 31 2019, and in accordance with the results of an estimate to calculate the Solvency II-based economic solvency ratio as of December 31 2020 (hereinafter - the "Estimate"); for further details on the Estimate, see immediate report of March 25 2021.
According to the audited results as of December 31 2020, following the dividend distribution, as stated above, the economic solvency ratio of The Phoenix Insurance is 192%, and the economic solvency ratio net of the transitional provisions for the Transitional Period and without adjusting the equity scenario is 116%. These results meet the capital target set by the Board of Directors, which is 105% and meet the 150%-170% target range, in which the company seeks to be during and after the Transitional Period, given the Deduction During the Transitional Period and its gradual reduction; thus, the Company meets the requirements of the letter published by the Commissioner in October 2017 regarding restrictions on dividend distribution, as stated above.
1 On December 30 2019, the Company's Board of Directors approved the transfer of Excellence Pension and Provident Funds Ltd. to The Phoenix Holdings Ltd. as distribution of a dividend in kind to the Company. The transfer was approved by the Commissioner; however, the Israel Tax Authority's approval for the execution of the transfer has not yet been received, and therefore the transfer has not yet been made. In view of the above, on October 27 2020, the Company's Board of Directors passed a resolution whereby the target is inapplicable to the transfer. Upon receipt of the Israel Tax Authority's approval, the execution of the abovementioned transfer shall be assessed subject to the provisions of the Solvency Circular and letter. For further details, see Section 1.3.10 in the Report of the Board of Directors as of March 31 2021. It should also be noted that this transfer is expected to reduce The Phoenix Insurance's capital surplus by approximately NIS 160 million (an effect of approximately 2% on the solvency ratio), based on a calculation carried out in respect of December 31 2020, without taking into account the provisions in the Transitional Period.

The following are data on the Company's economic solvency ratio, calculated without taking into account the transitional provisions and the solvency ratio target set by the Company's Board of Directors with respect to the solvency ratio calculated without taking into account the provisions during the Transitional Period and adjusting the equity scenario, as required by the letter. The ratio is higher than the solvency ratio required by the letter.
| As of December 31 | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2020 | 2019 | |
| Audited | ||
| In NIS thousand | ||
| Own funds in respect of SCR - please see Section 6 | 9,931,007 | 9,161,522 |
| Solvency capital requirement (SCR) - please see Section 6 | 8,557,405 | 8,896,554 |
| Economic solvency ratio (in %) | 116% | 103% |
| Effect of material capital-related measures taken in the period between the calculation date and the publication date of the solvency ratio report: |
||
| Raising of equity instruments | - | 220,000 |
| Total own funds in respect of SCR | 9,931,007 | 9,381,522 |
| Surplus | 1,373,602 | 484,967 |
| Economic solvency ratio (in %) | 116% | 105% |
| Capital surplus after capital-related actions in relation to the Board of Directors' target: |
||
| Minimum solvency ratio target without applying the transitional provisions | 105% | 105%2 |
| Capital surplus over target* | 945,731 | 40,140 |
* The capital surplus includes 35% of the original difference attributed to the purchase of the activity of provident funds and management companies amounting to approximately NIS 15 million as of December 31 2020 and 2019. The difference is not recognized for dividend distribution purposes, as aforesaid.
For an explanation about key changes compared with last year see Section 1a above.
| Benjamin Gabbay Chairman of the Board of Directors |
Eyal Ben Simon President and CEO |
Eli Schwartz Deputy CEO, Chief Financial Officer |
Amit Netanel VP Chief Risk Officer |
|---|---|---|---|
2 On December 30 2019, the Company's Board of Directors approved the transfer of Excellence Pension and Provident Funds Ltd. to The Phoenix Holdings Ltd. as distribution of a dividend in kind to the Company. The transfer was approved by the Commissioner; however, the Israel Tax Authority's approval for the execution of the transfer has not yet been received, and therefore the transfer has not yet been made. In view of the above, on October 27 2020, the Company's Board of Directors passed a resolution whereby the target is inapplicable to the transfer. Upon receipt of the Israel Tax Authority's approval, the execution of the abovementioned transfer shall be assessed subject to the provisions of the Solvency Circular and letter. For further details, see Section 1.3.10 in the Report of the Board of Directors as of March 31 2021. It should also be noted that this transfer is expected to reduce The Phoenix Insurance's capital surplus by approximately NIS 160 million (an effect of approximately 2% on the solvency ratio), based on a calculation carried out in respect of December 31 2020, without taking into account the provisions in the Transitional Period.

Building tools?
Free accounts include 100 API calls/year for testing.
Have a question? We'll get back to you promptly.