Regulatory Filings • Aug 20, 2024
Regulatory Filings
Open in ViewerOpens in native device viewer
For the month of August 2024 Commission File Number: 001-37643
PURPLE BIOTECH LTD. (Translation of registrant's name into English)
4 Oppenheimer Street, Science Park, Rehovot 7670104, Israel (Address of principal executive offices)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant files or will file annual reports under cover Form 20-F or Form 40-F.
Form 20-F ☒ Form 40-F ☐
On August 19, 2024, Purple Biotech Ltd. (the "Company" or the "Registrant") is announcing that it has made available an updated Company Presentation on its website. A copy of the updated Company Presentation is attached hereto as Exhibit 99.1 and may be viewed at the Company's website at www.purple-biotech.com.
99.1 Purple Biotech Corporate Presentation August 2024
This Report on Form 6-K, including all exhibits attached hereto, is hereby incorporated by reference into each of the Registrant's Registration Statement on Form S-8 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 20, 2016 (Registration file number 333-211478), the Registrant's Registration Statement on Form S-8 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on June 6, 2017 (Registration file number 333-218538), the Registrant's Registration Statement on Form F-3, as amended, originally filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on July 16, 2018 (Registration file number 333-226195), the Registrant's Registration Statement on Form S-8 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 28, 2019 (Registration file number 333-230584), the Registrant's Registration Statement on Form F-3 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on September 16, 2019 (Registration file number 333-233795), the Registrant's Registration Statement on Form F-1 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on December 27, 2019 (Registration file number 333-235729), the Registrant's Registration Statement on Form F-3 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 13, 2020 (Registration file number 333-238229), the Registrant's Registration Statement on Form S-8 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 18, 2020 (Registration file number 333-238481), each of the Registrant's Registration Statements on Form F-3 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on July 10, 2020 (Registration file numbers 333-239807 and 333-233793), the Registrant's Registration Statement on Form S-8 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on April 4, 2022 (Registration file number 333-264107) and the Registrant's Registration Statement on Form F-3 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 23, 2023 (Registration file number 333-270769), the Registrant's Registration Statement on Form F-3, as amended, originally filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on December 8, 2022 (Registration file number 333-268710), the Registrant's Registration Statement on Form F-1, as amended, originally filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on October 30, 2023 (Registration file number 333-275216) and the Registrant's Registration Statement on Form F-1, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on July 22, 2024 (Registration file number 333-280947), to be a part thereof from the date on which this report is submitted, to the extent not superseded by documents or reports subsequently filed or furnished.
1
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
By: /s/ Lior Fhima
Lior Fhima Chief Financial Officer


Certain statenents in this presentation that are forward of listorical for are forward-looking statements whilin the neaming of the safe the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Such forward-looking by strements that are not satements of historial fine, and may be identified by wors such as "televe", "spec", "intend", "plan", "nay", "stould", "mill", "project", "trill", "project", "tonime" or "anticipat" or their negative or variations of these words of thes wor other conparable words or by the fact that there strictly to historial mates. You should not place under etiance on these forwardeding statements, witch are not guandees of fiture performance. Forwards relect our curent views, expectations, beliefs or intentions with respect to fitter evens, and are subject to a number of assuppions, involve laova ad unknown isks, many of vill as vell as vell as uncertaintes and other fields, performace or actual results, performace or achievements of e significally differan from any fitter reals, performants expressed or implied by the forward-looking statements. Inportant factors that could cause or contribut to such differences includ anong others, risks relating to the plans stransgement for fitter opentions; product development for NT219, CM24 and M1240; the process by which such sage therapentic candidates could potentials long and subject to lights significant risks, particularly with respect on joint development onlaboration, the fact that drug development and commercialization investion process with uncome; our alily to successfily develop and connective levelop and connectively poduct; the expense, length, pogress and reals, the inport of any changes in regulation and legislation that only the diffect the planneentical natusty the difficulty in receiting the regulatory appovals necessary in oder to commercialize of predicing actions of the U.S. Food and Drug Admisistation or any other applicable of plamaceutical products; the regilatory environment and regions in the counties in which we operate; the uncertainty survounding the actual narket resption o our phannacentical products one cleared for market the introduction of competing poducts; patents obtained by competitors; dependence on the effectivenes of on patent and other protections for ability to obtain nairing and defent issued patents, the commencement of any patent interfrence or inflingenen action against on patents, and ou ability to preval, obtain a favorale cannounces in any such actor, and the exposue to lingtion, and or regalatory actions; the inpact of the economic public heath, political and security sination in Minch we nay operate or obtain approvals for our products or our business, and obler factors that are discussed in our Amal Report on Form 202 December 3, 2023 and in our other filings with the U.S. Securities and Excluding on cantionary discussion of fisks Foros" in on Registation Statements and Annual Reports. These are factor that we believe could case our actual results to diffe naterially from expected realls. Other firsed could also adversely offect us. Any forward-ooking statenent in this press reless speaks only as of the drish i is made. We disclaim any intention or obligation or plaward-looking statement or other information contained herin, whether as a result of new information, fittre events or otherwise, except as required by applicable law. Your anditional discloses we make in our reports o the SEC, which are arailable on the SEC's website, https://www.sec.gov.

Purple Biotech (NASDAQ/TASE: PPBT)



Lead indication: Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma (PDAC)
*Carcinoembryonic Antigen Cell Adhesion Molecule


Tumor immune evasion (1, 3)
Tumor progression (1, 2, 6)
Cancer-associated thrombosis (4)
IRPLE
cancers (pancreatic, breast, GI, etc.)

sion of Colon Carcinoma. J Immunol, 2020; ed from 'Chen, Q et al. Cancer 2021, 13, 2832'); Rayes RF, et al. Neutrophil Extractive CACAM. os Practive Therqueviti Targeverit Targe
| 8




I. http://we.net/mindi/co.net/st.in/
2. Nexus of online/color) 2023 72608; Crunernbyols artgen-relace tell of the blem mirely in person conce once once oncest. concer. Encer. incer, DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0113023 es in Medical Oncology. 2020;12. | 10 doi:10.1177/1758835920905408 e 3 study of liposomal into task pances in mal overal survival analysis and characterists of long term sunvors. Eur Cancer. 2019.00.00/pl.com. 2018.12.00 4. Wang-Gillam A, Hubner RA, Siveke JT, et al. NAPOLI-1 pha
A study of CM24 in combination with nivolumab plus chemotherapy in patients with PDAC in the 2nd line
The study is conducted in 18 centers in the US, Spain & Israel
OS
Secondary endpoints: OS rate @ 6 & 12 months, PFS, PFS rate @ 3 & 6 months, ORR
Additional Interim analysis: 2H24 Top line data: 2H24 Measurement of CEACAM1 and other bio-markers is ongoing

| Characteristic | Experimental (n=16) |
Control (n=15) |
|---|---|---|
| Age (median) | 66 | 68 |
| Age ≥65 (n, %) | 8 (50.0) | 11 (73.3) |
| Male (n, %) | 10 (62.5) | 8 (53.3) |
| Female (n, %) | 6 (37.5) | 7 (46.7) |
| Race/ white (n, %) | 15 (93.8) | 14 (93.3) |
| BMI | 23.4 | 23.1 |
| O ECOG (n, %) |
5 (31.3) | 3 (20.0) |
| 1 | 11 (68.8) | 12 (80.0) |
| Time from initial diagnosis (median, mo) |
18 | 18 |
| Time from most recent disease progression (median, mo) |
0.94 | 0.89 |
| CR/PR/SD to prior line (%) | 43.8 | 60.0 |
26% reduction in risk of death (HR=0.74) and 28% reduction in the risk of progression or death (HR=0.72)
Prolongation of 2.1 months in median overall survival and 1.9 months in median progression-free survival

| 13
Higher objective response rate (ORR) (25% vs 7%)
Higher disease control rate (DCR) (63% vs 40%)
Consistent and continuous decrease in CA19-9 was observed

| Parameter | Experimental (n=16) | Control (n=15) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| OS (mo, median; 95% CI) | 7.72 (4.00-8.11) | 5.62 (3.22 -7.89) | |
| OS HR (95% CI) | 0.74 (0.31-1.77) | ||
| 6 mo OS (%) | 52.7 | 38.9 | |
| PFS (mo, median; 95% CI) | 3.8 (1.8-5.0) | 1.9 (0.9-3.6) | |
| PFS HR (95% CI) | 0.72 (0.33-1.60) | ||
| 3 mo PFS (%) | 60.0 | 46.7 | |
| 6 mo PFS (%) | 19.0 | 10.0 | |
| ORR (%) | 25.0 | 6.7 | |
| DCR (%) | 62.5 | 40.0 |

Concordant and consistent improvement in the primary and all secondary endpoints
| 15
Enhanced levels were measured in >90% of the patients
NET-related mean MPO over 6-fold higher than healthy donors
Median OS improvement of 3.6 mo (8.1 mo vs. 4.5 mo), HR 0.34 (95% Cl: 0.099-1.149)
NET-related serum MPO may serve as a predictive biomarker

NT219: A Small Molecule Dual Inhibitor of IRS 1/2 and STAT3
Lead indication: Recurrent/Metastatic Head & Neck Cancer (SCCHN)
URPLE
| Innovative MOA |
· NT219 is a First-in-Class, small molecule dual inhibitor of IRS1/2 and STAT3 · Covalently binds to IRS1/2 and leads to their degradation · Affects both the tumor and the TME · Suppresses cancer stem cells |
|
|---|---|---|
| Robust preclinical package |
· Outstanding efficacy in various PDX models in monotherapy and in combination · Uniquely positioned to tackle resistance to cancer treatment such as EGFRi, MAPKi and ICI |
|
| Clinical Stage |
· No DLTs in monotherapy or in combination · Early clinical activity demonstrated · RP2D determined at 100 mg/kg, Phase 1 concluded. Phase 2 initiation 1H25 |
|
| Broad Market Potential |
· Opportunity to establish a Standard of Care in 2L r/m SCCHN patients · Multiple market upsides in combination with major cancer treatments · NT219 is the only IRS inhibitor available for clinical investigations |
|
| 18 |


eni et al. Cancer Res 2013;73:4383-4394; N 73,suppl 1 e566s; Naokazu Ibuk, Mazyar Ghaffari, Hadas Reuveni et al. Mol Cancer Ther. 2014; 13(12); 2827-2827-2
et al. Oncogene 2016;35(20):2634-44. Zhao C et al. Trends Pha -4394; Machado-Neto et al. Clini
ene 2016;35(20):2675-80; fSanch ogene 2016; 35(20):2562-4; Flashner-Abramson,
linical oncology 2018; 15(4): 234-248. Zi Ying et al. J Cell Hadas, Levitzki Alexander et al. Or
. 2018;119:94 19-9432
Exon 19 deletion EGFR and T790M, biopsy of bone marrow metastasis, patient previously progressed on afatinib and osimertinib
Recurrent/metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (R/M SCCHN) metastasis, patient progressed on chemoradiation, several chemotherapies and pembrolizumab

Osimertinib 5 mg/kg, NT219 65 mg/kg, mean tumor volume at the end point, 3 mice/group;

Treatments on days 0, 3 and 10, cetuximab - 1mg/mouse, 3 mice/group; PBMCs (1.4M cells/mouse) were injected on day 6 ** p<0.01, * p<0.02 based on one-way ANOVA with post hoc Tukey's HSD test

| 21 NT 219 re - sensitizes PD 1 - refractory model 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 0 500 1000 1500 2000 Control α-PD-1 NT219 NT219+α-PD-1 Days post tumor challenge T u m o r v o l u m e ( m m 3 ) Days following tumor challenge PD 1 - resistant melanoma cells (FACS analysis) PDL1 expression (MFI) NT219 ( M) treatment in culture 0 1 10 NT 219 + PD 1 reverse resistant tumors NT 219 induces PDL 1 expression (n= 10 ) (n=10) (n= 10 ) (n=10) * Collaboration with Prof. Bareli and Prof. Curran, M.D. Anderson cancer center ; presented at AACR 2023


| 22 NT 219 combination with α PD 1 achieves a profound reprograming of the TME NT 219 and PD 1 combination converted immuno - suppressive TME to immuno - reactive * Collaboration with Prof. Bareli and Prof. Curran, M.D. Anderson cancer center, presented at AACR 2023 Activated cytotoxic T cells (% CD8 + GZMB + ) Activated NK cells (% NK 1.1 + GZMB + ) NT219+ PD1 leads to a significant increase in cytotoxic effector cells (T & NK cells) NT219+ PD1 leads to a significant reduction in myeloid derived suppressor cells (MDSC) % Mo - MDSC (out of CD45 + ) % Gr - MDSC (out of CD 45 + )



Post-treatment
60
50
40 30
20
10 o
-10
-20 -30
-40
-50 -60
-70
6 24 12 24 50 100 24 12 100 12 (P) (N) (N) (P) (P) (P) (N) (P) (P) (N) (N)
Numbers under horizontal line designate NT219 dose in mg/kg; P = HPV positive; N = HPV negative
Best % change from baseline
· 20 evaluable patients (all doses): 2 PR (confirmed-GEJ, unconfirmed-PDAC), 5 SD

In preparation of a phase 2 study of NT219 in combination with cetuximab w/wo chemotherapy in 2L R/M SCCHN
| 25
Biomarker analysis at the 50mg/kg dose of NT219 with cetuximab:
· Significant differences in the activated pIGF1R and pSTAT3 were revealed in the 2 responders (PR) compared to the 2 non-responders (PD)



CAPTN-3: Conditionally-Activated Tri-Specific Antibody Platform
Lead candidate: IM1240 (CD3x5T4xNIKG2A)

| 28

| 29

| 30 NK cells CD 4 + / CD 8 + T cells CD 8 + NKG 2 A + T cells NK cell activation by inhibition of HLAE - NKG2A/CD94 binding CD 4 + / CD 8 + T cells activation through CD 3 binding CD8 + NKG2A + T cells double activation through CD3 binding and NKG2A - HLA - E axis blocking Unleashing both innate and adaptive immune systems


Synergistic effect of the a.CD3 and aNKG2A arms in suppressing 5T4*NCSLC Patient-Derived Explant (PDE)* at 10nM concentration

* E strictived throm only (realiner higher in the nite artited and minne eller promonomal be simp, mar her her represed on the site stores, market die sere one mana meller d representing no viable cancer cells. The analysis included (celt ) score of response (Response) using proprietary artificial intelligence (AJ algorithm (Qresponse),


* Study conditions: dose regimen-0.2mg/kg capped, equimolar 0.1mg/kg non capped, daily IP administration

Purple Biotech (NASDAQ/TASE: PPBT)



URE
Oncogene nature "CEACAM1 creates a pro-angiogenic "Immune-checkpoint molecules on "CEACAM1 regulates tumor microenvironment that regulatory T-cells as a potential TIM-3-mediated tolerance and therapeutic target in head and neck supports tumor vessel maturation" exhaustion" squamous cell cancers" Ferri, 2020 Shively, 2013 Tsang, 2020 @ "Journal"
Immunology Cancer Blotherapsed Cell Research "Neutrophil extracellular trap-"[Blockade] enhances natural "CEACAM1 regulates Fas-mediated associated CEACAM1 as a putative killer cell cytotoxicity against apoptosis in Jurkat T-cells via its therapeutic target to prevent tumor cells through blockade of the interaction with в-catenin" metastatic progression of colon inhibitory CEACAM1 / CEACAM5 carcinoma" immune checkpoint pathway"
| 37


| Grade | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AE Term | Total | 1 | 2 | 3 4/5 | ||
| Diarrhea | 5 | 4 | 1 | |||
| Abdominal pain | 4 | 1 | 3 | |||
| Fever | 4 | 2 | 2 | |||
| Headache | 4 | 3 | 1 | |||
| Fatigue | এ | 4 | ||||
| Nausea | 3 | 1 | 2 | |||
| Creatinine increased | 3 | 2 | 1 | |||
| Hypokalemia | 2 | 2 | ||||
| Dyspnea | 2 | 1 | 1 | |||
| Constipation | 2 | 2 | ||||
| Cough | 2 | 2 | ||||
| Abdominal pain aggravated | 1 | 1 | ||||
| Alkaline phosphatase increase | 1 | 1 | ||||
| Atrial flutter | 1 | 1 | ||||
| C-Diff Colitis | 1 | 1 | ||||
| GI bleed | 1 | 1 | ||||
| Leukocytosis | 1 | 1 | ||||
| Small bowel obstruction | 1 | 1 |
In the Phase 1 part, patients with indicated refractory cancers were administered CM24 at 10, 15, and 20mg/kg q2w and nivolumab 480mg q4w.
As of March 8th, 2022, a total of 13 patients were enrolled and 11 patients were evaluable for dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) determination (8 PDAC, 2 CRC and 1 PTC)
. 9 patients had received 2 prior regimens for metastatic disease and 2 patients had one previous line.

| Median age, years (range) | 65 (49-76) Prior Lines of Therapy, n (%) | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Sex, n (%) | 1 | 2 (18%) | |
| Male | 5 (45%) | 2 | 9 (82%) |
| Female | 6 (55%) | Diagnosis , n (%) | |
| Ethnicity, n (%) | Pancreatic cancer | 8 (73%) | |
| Not Hispanic or Latino | 10 (91%) | Papillary Thyroid cancer | 1 (9%) |
| Hispanic or Latino | 1 (9%) | Colorectal cancer | 2 (18%) |
| Race, n (%) | Median Time from Initial Diagnosis months (range) |
23 (11-73) | |
| White | 10 (91%) | ECOG, n (%) | |
| Black or African American | 1 (9%) | 0 | 7 (64%) |
| 1 | 4 (36%) |


SCREENING FIRST VISIT - PREDOSE 2 MONTH VISIT
PREDOSE

14 patients were evaluable for efficacy:





| 45 0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 0 5 10 15 20 Tumor volume (mm 3 ) Days following treatment initiation Control (n=3) NT219 (n=3) Keytruda (n=3) Keytruda + NT219 (n=3) Autologous PBMCs ( 2.1 M/mouse) NT 219 Re - sensitizes Tumors Refractory to α - PD 1 PDX Model Humanized PDX of GastroEsophageal Junction (GEJ) Cancer (refractory to pembrolizumab) Drug Pembrolizumab (Keytruda®) * Double autologous model - Tumors & PBMCs are from the same patient (#RA 236 ) | Keytruda - 6 mg/kg IP, NT 219 - 60 mg/kg IV
NT219 demonstrates a durable and dose-dependent suppression of STAT3 tyrosine phosphorylation, affecting both the tumor cells and the tumor microenvironment.


Zou, S., Tong, Q., Liu, B. et al. Targeting STAT3 in Cancer Immunotherapy. Mol Cancer 19, 145 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1186/



Colon cancer LS-513 cells overexpressing IRS2 demonstrate enhanced ß-catenin activity. Targeted inhibition of IRS2 by NT219 or IRS2-SH RNA, suppresses the increased f-catenin activity and inhibit LS-513 cell viability. Combination of 5-FU and NT219 significantly inhibited the growth of CRC tumors in brain, using intracranial model and exurvival.

AACR Annual Meeting, April 2021, AACR Virtual Special Conference on Epigenetics and Metabolism, Oct 2020, Ido Wolf, MD, Head of Oncology Division, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center


| 51 PDX model Pancreatic Cancer Drug Gemcitabine ( Gemzar ®) RNA Sequencing | Analysis of Tumors Following Treatment Reduced expression of IRS 1 , Ki 67 , FOXM 1 & TGFb is exhibited by pancreatic cancer treated with NT 219 alone and in combination with gemcitabine


Higher sensitivity of mKRAS(G22) in resisted on the MRTX133. a MRTX133-resistant PAC clone ws developed. Inhibition of mRAS C2DE.
sensive (APC-1) and residant (APCL-MTX1133-R monotherapy and in combination with MRTX1133 in colory formation assay of sensitive and resistant PDAC cell ines (B). Synergistic effect (CrC) of NT219 and MRTX133 wa demonstrated in 2D growth (C) and in spheroid 3D growth (D) of HPAC PDAC cells.
Collaborationn with Dr. Azmi, Karmanos. Presented at AACR Annual Meeting 2024
JRPLE
| 53
Building tools?
Free accounts include 100 API calls/year for testing.
Have a question? We'll get back to you promptly.