Annual Report • Jun 27, 2025
Annual Report
Open in ViewerOpens in native device viewer

NewRiver REIT plc Annual Report and Accounts 2025
Annual Report & Accounts 2025
| NewRiver REIT plc Annual Report and Accounts 2025 | Strategic Report | Governance Report | Financial Statements | ESG Data Sets & Appendix |
Glossary & Company Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Significant earnings growth with increased scale, a strong financial position and continued operational performance
Our purpose is to own, manage and develop a portfolio of retail assets across the UK that provide essential goods and services to local people, help support thriving communities and deliver long-term premium returns for our shareholders.
| Significant growth – successful acquisition of Capital & Regional |
Strong financial position |
High-quality, affordable portfolio3 |
|||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Increase in NewRiver balance sheet assets |
Increase in UFFO | Underlying Funds From Operations (UFFO) |
UFFO per share |
Occupancy | Retention | ||
| +65% +25% |
£30.5m | 8.1p | 96.1%2 | 90% | |||
| Expanding Capital Partnerships | FY24: £24.4m FY23: £25.8m |
FY24: 7.8p FY23: 8.3p |
FY24: 98.0% FY23: 96.7% |
FY24: 94% FY23: 92% |
|||
| Capital Partnership assets under management |
Capital Partnership assets |
IFRS profit / (loss) | Dividend per share | Total Property Return |
In-store sales growth (Lloyds Bank data)5 |
||
| £1.5 billion | 39 | £23.7m | 6.5p | 7.8% | +4.9% | ||
| FY24: £0.8bn +88% vs FY24 |
FY24: 23 +70% vs FY24 |
FY24: £3.0m FY23: £(16.8)m |
FY24: 6.6p FY23: 6.7p |
FY24: +4.8% FY23: +2.3% |
year-on-year | ||
| Capital Partnership fee income |
Portfolio valuation performance |
EPRA4 NTA per share |
Average rent | Occupational Cost Ratio (OCR) |
|||
| £2.9 million | +0.6%6 | 102p1 | £12.93 | 8.3% | |||
| FY24: £2.5m +16% growth vs FY24 |
FY24: -2.3% FY23: -5.9% |
FY24: 115p FY23: 121p |
per sq ft FY24: £11.82 FY23: £11.98 |
FY24: 8.8% FY23: n/a |
|||
| Acquisition of Ellandi, expanding our Capital | Loan to Value | Total accounting return | Good leasing | ||||
| Partnership portfolio, together with appointment on three further asset management mandates |
42.3% | -5.9%1 | performance | ||||
| Delivering sustainable growth | FY24: 30.8% | FY24: +0.5% | Long-term | Long-term transactions | |||
| Net-zero pathway progress | FY23: 33.9% | FY23: -4.6% | transactions | ||||
| Reduction of 13% in Scope 1 & reduction of 12% in Scope 2 emissions in FY25 vs FY24 |
Capital & Regional and Ellandi | 1. Including impact of 19.9% equity placing and acquisition of 2. Group occupancy has reduced following the acquisition of Capital & Regional; NewRiver like-for-like occupancy is 97.5% |
+17.5% | +8.8% | |||
| GRESB score improved from 72 to 80 | 3. Refer to Notes in the Financial Statements for further | vs previous rent | vs ERV | ||||
| Gained additional green star | context in addition to standard GAAP measures | information; Non-GAAP measures have been used in the highlights to provide additional performance insight and |
FY24: +1.8% FY23: +9.7% |
FY24: +3.6% FY23: +1.1% |
|||
| Maintained our 'B' rating in the CDP | 4. The European Public Real Estate Association (EPRA) previously spent in store. 6. See Glossary, like-for-like valuation growth. |
5. Includes online spend contribution where a customer had |
Front cover: A shopper in Broadway Square, Bexleyheath
Contents
& Appendix
Strategic Report
Glossary & Company Information
| Highlights | 1 | |
|---|---|---|
| Our transformational growth | 3 | |
| Our business model | 4 | |
| Our investment case | 5 | |
| Our people | 6 | |
| Our portfolio | 7 | |
| Our partnerships | 8 | |
| Chair's statement | 9 | |
| Chief Executive's review | 11 | |
| Key performance indicators | 15 | |
| Case studies | 18 | |
| Portfolio review | 26 | |
| Market review | 37 | |
| Chief Financial Officer's review | 51 | |
| Stakeholder engagement | 58 | |
| ESG report | 68 | |
| Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures |
89 | |
| Principal risks and uncertainties | 98 | |
| Viability statement | 109 | |
| Non-financial and sustainability information statement |
111 | |
| Governance Report | 112 | |
| Financial Statements | 161 | |
| ESG Data Sets Appendix | 210 | |
| NewRiver team | Glossary and Company Information | 214 |
member using the Royal Mail locker at the Exchange, IIford
has created increased scale and delivered significant earnings growth
In December 2024 we completed a major corporate transaction to acquire listed retail real estate company Capital & Regional plc for £151 million, funded through a combination of cash and shares, following a successful and oversubscribed equity raise.
The acquisition increased the scale of our portfolio through the combination of six complementary shopping centres with a similarly low-risk tenant profile and strong income growth potential.
The Capital & Regional assets are performing well, with integration and synergies on track following the acquisition.
| NewRiver balance sheet | UFFO | Annualised |
|---|---|---|
| assets increased | increased | gross rent |
| +65% | 25% | +70% |
| vs FY24 | vs FY24 | vs FY24 |
| Cost | Robust capital | Expected |
| synergies | structure maintained | to deliver |
| £6.21 million expected to be fully unlocked on an annualised basis within 12 months of completion |
3.5% average cost of debt with improved maturity profile |
mid-to-high teens accretion to UFFO per share |
with greater share liquidity, a broader shareholder base and larger weightings in key indices
NewRiver REIT plc | Annual Report and Accounts 2025 Governance Report Financial Statements ESG Data Sets 4 & Appendix Glossary & Company Information Strategic Report
We assess the long-term resilience of our assets, with capital allocation decisions made by comparing risk adjusted returns on our assets to those available from other uses of capital. Capital allocation options include investing into our portfolio, acquiring assets in the direct real estate market and share buybacks. Assets can be acquired either on our balance sheet or in capital partnerships.
1 3 2
with a committed ESG strategy embedded across our business
Our operating platform is underpinned by a conservative, predominantly unsecured balance sheet. We are focused on maintaining our prudent covenant headroom position and have access to significant cash reserves which provide us with the flexibility to pursue opportunities which support our strategy for growth.
We leverage our market leading platform to enhance and protect income returns through active asset management across our assets and for assets we manage on behalf of our capital partnerships; the latter provides enhanced returns through asset management fee income and the opportunity to receive promote fees.
Our business model is underpinned by a high-quality portfolio, expert team, strong working relationships, data-driven insight, robust systems and a commitment to sustainability to support the delivery of positive performance for the long-term
How we've delivered on our business model this year
Acquisition of Capital & Regional for £151 million at a significant discount to NTA
+70% +65%
annualised gross rent increase in NewRiver balance sheet assets
Acquisition of Ellandi, expanding our Capital Partnership platform, together with expansion of existing Capital Partnerships and appointment on two new local authority mandates
Capital Partnerships assets under management Capital Partnerships fee income
Capital Partnerships assets increase in net fee income
39 +19%
(compound annual growth rate over 5 years)
This combined activity has further enhanced our expertise and scale; extended our capabilities to include destination assets; and increased our fee income
5.4x Net debt: EBITDA
Our team, portfolio and scale mean we have unrivalled expertise and knowledge of the consumer, retail and capital markets.

Company Information
NewRiver REIT plc | Annual Report and Accounts 2025 Governance Report Financial Statements ESG Data Sets 6 & Appendix Glossary & Company Information Strategic Report
Specialist, expert and motivated people drive performance
23% Ethnic diversity 50:50 Male:Female ratio



named one of the Sunday Times Best Places to Work for two consecutive years
scalable platform with expert retail real estate specialist team
Highly experienced
Board and Executive team
2,500 hours
professional training across the company
Low absentee rate of 0%

Our well-positioned portfolio is focused on providing essential goods, services and experiences to local communities. Our assets are hand-picked to provide space for successful and growing retail and leisure operators, including those with a growing omni-channel provision. We provide space at affordable average rents in locations across the UK; and we now have a greater exposure to London assets.

shopping centres
retail parks
annual rent
tenancies
sq foot total area
long-term leasing transactions
+17.5%
vs previous rent
We leverage our market leading platform to manage assets on behalf of multiple partners

Our Capital Partnership portfolio focuses on four core asset types that provide affordable and well-located space for occupiers:
39
Capital Partnership assets (FY24: 23)
18
retail parks
shopping centres
21

Delivered growth in our Capital Partnership portfolio through the acquisition of Ellandi in July 2024, expansion of existing Capital Partnerships and appointment on 2 new local authority mandates
+16% growth vs FY24 Capital Partnerships total fee income
+88% growth vs FY24 Capital Partnerships assets under management
+135% growth vs FY24 Capital Partnerships area
It has been a transformational year for NewRiver with the acquisition of Capital & Regional for £151 million which completed on the 10 December 2024. This has materially increased our scale, with our balance sheet portfolio value increasing by 65%, net assets by 35% and our Underlying Funds From Operations by 25% with further material earnings growth anticipated in the new financial year. We believe that the acquisition has a strong strategic, operational and financial rationale that will deliver significant benefits to all stakeholders.
Lynn Fordham Chair
Strategic Report
& Appendix
Glossary & Company Information
Chair's statement continued
To partly fund the acquisition, we undertook an equity placing and retail offer which was heavily oversubscribed and priced at a modest premium to the prevailing share price. We believe the success of our equity placing is reflective of increased investor confidence in NewRiver, the attractiveness of the Capital & Regional transaction and a recognition that our marketplace has been improving. The placing enabled us to enhance our equity market profile with an expanded and strengthened shareholder register as well as enhanced trading liquidity in our shares. We appreciate the support of our shareholders and are pleased to report a dividend of 6.5 pence per share this year, comfortably fully covered by Underlying Funds From Operations.
The last year has seen another strong operational performance from NewRiver, yet again in sharp contrast to sentiment towards real estate in the equity capital markets. The Chief Executive's Review covers this in detail, but the highlights include: another year of strong leasing performance, despite the challenging consumer market; continued progress on disposing or improving the workout assets leaving a strong core portfolio; progress on the key regeneration schemes; and good revenue growth in capital partnerships. This has all been achieved alongside further progress on our ESG journey with continued improvement in our GRESB score to 80 and for the fourth consecutive year we retained our Gold sBPR award from EPRA. We are also proud to be an Accredited Real Living Wage Employer and also to be recognised as one of the Sunday Times' "Best Places to Work".
In what has been a very busy year, none of this would have been possible without the hard work and support of the team and my colleagues on the Board. We have a fantastic team at NewRiver who are focused on delivering the best returns for shareholders and we are all grateful to our shareholders for your support throughout the year.
"We believe the success of our equity placing as reflective of increased investor confidence in NewRiver, the attractiveness of the Capital & Regional transaction and a recognition that our marketplace has been improving."
NewRiver REIT plc | Annual Report and Accounts 2025 Governance Report Financial Statements ESG Data Sets 11 Strategic Report
& Appendix
Glossary & Company Information
Chief Executive's review
Reiterating the Chair's statement, the acquisition of Capital & Regional has been transformational for the business and sets a strong platform for further growth. Price paid is critically important in determining future returns and, in that regard, we believe we acquired Capital & Regional at an attractive level. Capital & Regional's assets were valued in June 2024 at £350 million resulting in net assets of £175 million, which compares favourably to the price that we paid of £151 million, based on the middle-market closing price of NewRiver's shares on 10 December 2024, a discount of 14%.
The transaction affords us the opportunity to unlock significant cost synergies that will deliver material earnings accretion. In total we expect to unlock approximately £6.2 million of recurring annual cost synergies, the majority of which are expected to be effective in FY26. These cost savings will arise from the removal of duplicative functions and the rationalisation of listing and other administrative and operational expenses.
Allan Lockhart Chief Executive NewRiver REIT plc | Annual Report and Accounts 2025 Governance Report Financial Statements ESG Data Sets 12 Strategic Report
& Appendix
Glossary & Company Information
Our aim remains to preserve a robust and conservatively leveraged balance sheet in line with our financial policies and guidance. Following completion of the acquisition, we maintained a weighted average cost of 3.5% across drawn debt of £444 million with a diversified debt maturity profile and no maturity on drawn debt until January 2027. We will also benefit from the enhanced financial flexibility and expected cost of capital benefits resulting from increased scale. At the year end, our LTV was 42.3%, in-line with post Capital & Regional acquisition proforma but ahead of guidance of <40%. We were clear at the time of the acquisition that we intended to return LTV to within our guidance level through a modest and achievable level of disposals, and immediately post year end we completed the disposal of the Abbey Centre in Newtownabbey, which reduces our LTV to c.38% meaning we are within guidance with capacity to invest into accretive asset acquisitions.
Whilst our primary focus has been on M&A activity in the year, this did not detract from our operational performance, which has been excellent with another period of good leasing performance both in terms of volume and pricing. Consequently, occupancy and tenant retention rates remained high, demonstrating that we have the right assets in the right locations let to the right occupiers, as well as reflecting the quality of our asset management.
During the 12 months ended 31 March 2025, we delivered £30.5 million of UFFO, equating to 8.1 pence on a per share basis. As a result, we have declared a fully covered final dividend of 3.5 pence per share, and a total dividend for FY25 of 6.5 pence per share, representing a payout equivalent to 80% of UFFO which is in-line with our dividend policy. Our EPRA Net Tangible Assets Per Share at the full year was
102 pence, compared to 106 pence per share at the half year, in-line with the proforma guidance communicated in our half year results and pleasingly our portfolio valuation returned to growth at the full year.
The UK consumer remains strong, with elevated savings, stable house prices, low levels of unemployment and wages exceeding inflation since June 2023. This has supported retail and supermarket spending which, based on Lloyds Bank data, has delivered year-on-year sales growth of +1.5% for the 12 months to March 2025. This continued growth is a solid result given that retail accounts for 27% of Lloyds Bank's 26 million customers' annual spend and supermarkets account for a further 19% and is despite consumers having to increase their essential spending such as on mortgages +8% year-on-year and council tax +13%.
Whilst the retail, hospitality and leisure sectors have been undoubtedly impacted by the April 2025 increases in national insurance and the minimum wage, other costs for retailers have been reducing. This includes energy, shipping costs and factory gate prices. The benefit of an appreciating Pound versus the US Dollar is also supporting lower prices especially for non-food retailers buying products in Asia, with a potential increased price negotiating power for UK retailers with suppliers as result of the US imposed tariffs on China. For UK food retailers their supply chains are more orientated to European and UK markets and as such US tariffs are unlikely to have a material impact. That said, US tariffs have been impacting consumer confidence and in turn will potentially lead to a slowdown in economic growth. We will monitor our customer spending data carefully.
Our occupational market is in its strongest position for a decade having navigated significant challenges, with vacancy continuing to decline across the sector and rental growth starting to emerge for assets in the right locations. We believe this for three key reasons: firstly, much of the corporate restructuring has already taken place with the weaker retailers removed from the market; secondly, most national retailers have focused on operational efficiency and margin growth, leading to improved financial results; and lastly, pure online retail is going through its own period of disruption with the line between in-store and online sales increasingly blurred and omnichannel retailers gaining market share. This is positive for our sector as the physical store is at the centre of omnichannel retailing, arguably the genuine last mile fulfilment and a business-critical channel for retail today and into the future.
Investment volumes in 2024 rebounded versus 2023 for both shopping centres and retail parks. Shopping centre volumes were up 70% at £2.0 billion reflecting improving investment sentiment as the sector offers one of the highest day one yield spreads to the 10-year Gilt. The first quarter has been relatively muted due to limited supply rather than a lack of demand. Retail park volumes surged by 75% to total £3.3 billion. Investor demand remains broad based, underpinned by strong occupational demand dynamics, very low vacancy and constrained future development limiting new supply of space.
Investor demand for both shopping centres and retail parks is further supported by increasing competition from debt providers, which is resulting in lower margins and higher LTVs.
Total portfolio value increased by 65% to £897 million, principally as a result of the Capital & Regional acquisition, whose portfolio comprised of six community shopping centres predominantly located in London and South East England and principally let to low-risk, essential and value-oriented retailers that are highly complementary to NewRiver's existing portfolio. In addition, through this acquisition, we now own Snozone, the UK's largest indoor ski slope operator with profitable centres in Milton Keynes, Yorkshire and Madrid (Spain).
Our Core Shopping Centres and Retail Parks, which represent 94% of our total portfolio value, continue to perform well as evidenced by high occupancy, high tenant retention rate and another period of strong leasing and customer sales performance. The active demand for space across our Core Portfolio, which is broad based, is reflective of our portfolio positioning towards essential based retail and services, which is the right place to be in a higher interest and cost environment.
"The acquisition of Capital & Regional has been transformational for the business and sets a strong platform for further growth."
Strategic Report
& Appendix
Chief Executive's review continued
Over the past 12 months we have been working with Lloyds Bank, combining high-quality consumer spending data with our retail market expertise. NewRiver's analysis, informed by Lloyds Bank data, has provided greater insight into the profile of our shoppers and performance of our assets and to date, we have detailed customer spending insights on assets representing 85% of our portfolio by value. Our analysis shows that for the year ending 31 March 2025, in-store retail sales increased by +4.3% relative to the prior year, significantly outperforming the wider market, demonstrating that our portfolio is proving consistently popular with consumers. Based on the sales performance of our tenants within our portfolio over the reporting period, our current occupational cost ratio is 8.3% which is highly affordable, and which partly explains our excellent leasing performance.
The success that our assets have had over the year in attracting increased customer spend is clearly good for our tenants and this has translated into another year of strong leasing performance. Over the year within our Core Shopping Centres, we completed 571,600 sq ft of leasing transactions on average +5.4% above valuer's ERV, which was the 5th consecutive financial year of positive leasing spreads, and +17.2% above previous rent. We have also seen a steady improvement over the last three financial years of leasing transactions versus previous passing rent, and aggregating those total leasing transactions, the compound annual growth rate over the last three years is positive +0.7% on a 8.5 year previous lease length. Given the substantial disruption the market has seen, this is an excellent result. The stability that we have in our Core Shopping Centres is also reflected in the vacancy rate which is only 4% and where we have a retention rate of 89%.
Our Retail Parks are also delivering excellent operational performance with leasing transactions completed at +20.6% versus the valuer's ERV and +19.1% versus the previous passing rent. The depth of demand is demonstrated by the vacancy rate which sits at only 3%, a tenant retention rate at 100% and the average compound annual growth rate over the last three years versus previous passing rent of +0.9% on a 15.5 year previous lease length.
Our Regeneration and Work Out assets represent only 6% of our total portfolio by value reflecting the good progress made in reducing our exposure through disposals particularly in relation to Work Out. Over the year we have made good progress with the remaining few assets. In Burgess Hill, we are close to exchanging a conditional contract to form a joint venture with Mid Sussex Council to deliver our regeneration project. Importantly no further equity is required from NewRiver as the project is expected to benefit from grant funding and an attractive facility from Homes England. Terms on pre-lets have been agreed with a major food discounter and budget hotel operator and a sale of part to a residential developer. We are targeting to commence project works at the end of 2025.
In Cardiff, our remaining key Work Out asset, planning consent was received to repurpose this shopping centre into an 80,000 sq ft multi-entertainment centre that will include numerous social competitive offerings as well as a range of food and beverage provisions. We are now in the final stages of agreeing a long-term indexed lease to one of the UK's leading leisure operators for the entirety. Project works are due to commence imminently, and upon completion will deliver a significant net operating income increase.
Capital Partnerships are an important component of our strategy to deliver earnings growth in a capital light way and so we were delighted to acquire Ellandi in July 2024. The acquisition is aligned with NewRiver's strategy to expand our Capital Partnership business over the medium term, leveraging our position as one of the largest specialist retail real estate asset managers in the UK. Investment partners are increasingly recognising the importance of track record and specialism in this highly operational asset class.
Today our Capital Partnership business has genuine scale, with assets under management of £1.5 billion across a portfolio of 21 shopping centres and 18 retail parks, with 14 different partners. Our Partner mandates include private equity, banks, an institution and local authorities. Total annualised revenue net of costs is currently £3.8 million and the compound annual growth rate in our Capital Partnership net revenues over the last five years has been 19%. We see no reason why we cannot maintain that growth rate over the next five years.
"In-store retail sales increased by 4.3% relative to the prior year, significantly outperforming the wider market, demonstrating that our portfolio is proving consistently popular with consumers."
Strategic Report
& Appendix
Glossary & Company Information
Retail is a fast moving and dynamic market and as such has become highly operational for both owners and occupiers of retail real estate. For several years now, we have continued to invest in our people, data and systems which we believe allows us to make better decisions, improves our operational efficiency and delivers market leading performance.
We have a fantastic culture at NewRiver with a passionate team of people with considerable experience and expertise in real estate and finance. We do not take our carefully nurtured culture for granted as we continuously invest to ensure that we have the most talented, agile and happy team we possibly can.
We are strong believers that access to high quality data allows us to make better decisions whether that relates to capital deployment, leasing, tenant mix, marketing, car parking pricing or overall risk assessment of assets. We know that many of our occupiers are also using data to enhance their customer experience, and we believe that it is important that we also have a great insight into the millions of customers that visit our assets.
The most important data, in our opinion, is live consumer spending. This is why we have started working with Lloyds Bank to combine high-quality consumer spending data with our retail market expertise and now have access to spending data on 85% of our portfolio by value which is updated quarterly. This data provides us a detailed insight into the health and activity of our consumer base and performance of our retailers. It includes store-by-store sales turnover, the online contribution from that store, where customers are coming from, where else they are spending, frequency of visits, average transaction values, a customer demographic profile and interestingly,
where customers tend to make their first purchase, their second purchase and beyond. The application and analysis of this data touches almost every asset management decision that we make and therefore will significantly enhance our capabilities to make the right decisions in the future to further enhance our asset business plans.
Handling a greater volume of data to inform real-time decision-making processes requires highly organised and increasingly automated systems. Several years ago, we invested in a fully integrated property management and accounting system with highly user-friendly dashboards accessed via both laptop and mobile and we continue to invest in the phased enhancement of this whilst also ensuring that we maintain strong cyber security.
Five years on from our original net-zero target baseline year of FY20, we are 93% of the way to achieving our SBTi near-term target to reduce our absolute scope 1 & 2 emissions by 42% by 2030, having achieved a total reduction of 39% at the end of FY25. Throughout our journey so far, we've disclosed our energy and emissions performance on both an absolute and like-for-like basis, to ensure transparency as to emissions reductions that have been achieved through our proactivity in the pursuit of our objective to minimise our environmental impact, vs emissions reductions that have arisen from changes to our portfolio composition.
Between FY24 and FY25, across the existing NewRiver portfolio we saw a 13% reduction in absolute scope 1 emissions and a 12% reduction in absolute scope 2 emissions, whilst on a like-for-like basis, we reduced gas and electricity consumption within the landlordcontrolled areas of our portfolio by 10% and 2%
respectively, owing to energy conservation measures implemented at our assets. Alongside our portfolio emissions reductions, we've now reached the end date of our corporate net-zero target. We've abated our corporate scope 1&2 emissions through our move to a highefficiency, all-electric office, and procuring renewable electricity. We've measured our FY25 corporate scope 3 emissions at 560 tonnes, which we have offset via the Woodland Trust to bring them to a net-zero level.
This year, we improved our GRESB score from 72/100 to 80/100, earning us an additional "green star" representing our improved performance relative to our peer group. We retained our 'B' rating from the CDP and achieved our goal of improving performance within the "Emissions Reduction Initiatives and Low Carbon Products" aspect of the assessment, which was identified as a key improvement opportunity in our FY24 Annual Report and Accounts, and for which we achieved an 'A' rating this year. For a fourth consecutive year, we also retained our Gold sBPR award from EPRA in recognition of the high transparency and comparability of our ESG performance disclosures, which is a key indicator of upholding our core ESG objective of Leading in Governance and Disclosure. Strengthening our fulfilment of this objective, we became an Accredited Real Living Wage Employer and are proud to have retained our recognition as one of the Sunday Times' "Best Places to Work".
The benefits of the Capital & Regional transaction are starting to flow through, with further benefit to be realised in FY26 and FY27 as the cost synergies are fully unlocked.
Our aim is to deliver consistent market leading earnings growth beyond just the benefits of the Capital & Regional acquisition, even taking into account likely higher finance costs in a few years' time. Our key growth drivers are net rental income growth, the signs for which are positive and should lead to valuation growth allowing us to access some of our untapped liquidity for earnings accretive acquisitions, continuing revenue growth from Capital Partnerships, for which our five year track record of growth is supportive, and capital recycling, which offers us the opportunity to deliver further earnings growth.
Our long-held view of the importance of income returns today serves us well. Our portfolio is performing well, supported by a highly experienced and motivated team underpinned by a strong balance sheet, and whilst the macro environment has been volatile, we have a clear pathway to deliver attractive returns for our shareholders.
How our KPIs align with our business model, strategic objectives, ESG strategy and Executive remuneration

Underlying Funds From Operations1
Underlying Funds From Operations (UFFO) measures underlying operational profits and excludes one-off or non-cash adjustments. We consider this to be the most appropriate measure of the underlying performance of the business, as it reflects our generation of operating profits.

Environmental, Social and Governance
£30.5m
Total UFFO for the year was £30.5 million, increased from £24.4 million the previous year principally as result of the acquisition of Capital & Regional plc.

Loan to Value (LTV) is the proportion of our properties that are funded by borrowings. The measure is presented on a proportionally consolidated basis. Maintaining an LTV of less than 50% is one of our five key Financial Policies and in addition our medium-term guidance is to maintain an LTV of less than 40%.

17
25
The admin cost ratio is total administrative expenses as a proportion of gross revenue on a proportionally consolidated basis, including our share of administrative expenses and gross revenue from joint ventures and associates. It is a measure of our operational efficiency.

42.3%
LTV increased following the acquisition of Capital & Regional plc, however pro forma LTV reduced to c.3.8% following post balance sheet disposal of Abbey Centre, Newtownabbey, now within <40% guidance.

14.1%
In recent years our admin cost ratio increased as we waited to deploy the proceeds of the disposal activity completed between FY22 and FY24. In the second half of FY25 we completed the acquisition of Capital & Regional plc, which has reduced the admin cost ratio in FY25.
21 22 23 24 25
15 16
14

Glossary & Company Information
Key performance indicators continued
How our KPIs align with our business model, strategic objectives, ESG strategy and Executive remuneration
| F Financial |
|---|
| C Corporate |
| O Operational |
| Our Business Model |
| 1 Disciplined capital allocation |
| 2 Leveraging our platform |
| 3 Flexible Balance Sheet |
| £ Remuneration |
Environmental, Social and Governance
Total Property Return is a measure of the income and capital growth generated across our portfolio. It is calculated by MSCI Real Estate on our behalf, using independent valuers. We assess our performance against the market by comparing our returns to the MSCI All Retail benchmark.

Total Accounting Return (TAR) is the change in EPRA Net Tangible Assets (NTA) per share over the year, plus dividends paid, as a percentage of the EPRA NTA at the start of the year. TAR performance relative to UK-listed Real Estate Investment Trusts is a key metric used in setting the Long-Term Incentive Plan.

Interest cover is the ratio of our operating profit to our net financing costs, on a proportionally consolidated basis, including our share of operating profit and net financing costs from joint ventures and associates. Maintaining interest cover of more than 2.0x is one of our five key Financial Policies.

Our portfolio delivered a Total Return of +7.8%, an improvement on the FY24 Total Return of +4.8%. Our portfolio continues to outperform the MSCI Shopping Centre and Retail Warehouse benchmarks over the three and five year periods. Over a 12-month period, the portfolio's Income Return outperformed the market by +150bps.
Link to strategy, ESG and Remuneration Link to strategy, ESG and Remuneration Link to strategy, ESG and Remuneration

Our performance
+7.8%
-5.9%
Although the valuation of the property portfolio and UFFO per share both increased during FY25, Total Accounting Return was significantly impacted by equity issuance and transaction costs associated with the transformational acquisition of Capital & Regional plc.

6.0x
Interest cover maintained, significant headroom to our Financial Policy and in line with the prior year position at 6.0x.

Key performance indicators continued
Key
How our KPIs align with our business model, strategic objectives, ESG strategy and Executive remuneration


Occupancy
Retail occupancy is the estimated rental value of occupied retail units expressed as a percentage of the total estimated rental value of the retail portfolio, excluding development activities.

GRESB is the leading sustainability benchmark for the global real estate sector. Assessments are guided by factors that investors and the industry consider to be material in the sustainability performance of real estate asset investments, resulting in an overall score marked out of 100. Improvements in our GRESB score help measure the effectiveness of our ESG programme.
70
72 80

Environmental, Social and Governance
96.1%
We continue to maintain a high occupancy level with combined retail occupancy at 31 March 2025, including Capital & Regional plc, of 96.1%. Note that NewRiver's standalone occupancy at 31 March 2025 was 97.5%, in line with prior years.

80
60 68
We improved our GRESB score from 72 to 80, earning an additional 'green star' signifying improved performance relative to other GRESB participants, and again achieved a perfect score in the Management module (30/30) and retained full marks in Social (18/18) and Governance (20/20).
21 22 23 24 25

Our growing portfolio
Owned asset, retail park
Dumfries Cuckoo Bridge Retail Park
Acquired in June 2016, Cuckoo Bridge is a leading retail park in Dumfries, Scotland, with a retail catchment of c. 89,000 residents living within a 30-minute drive time.
Our occupiers are a mix of grocery, DIY, discount, homeware and a drive thru coffee pod, providing a well-located and accessible retail offer with a range of affordable goods.
NewRiver ownership 100% 91% occupancy; fully let on completion of new lettings
Occupational cost ratio 7.3%
In-store sales growth accounting for online spend contribution +5.6%
This year we secured a 15-year lease with Sainsbury's on improved rental terms, 60% above previous rent and valuer's ERV.
Sainsbury's will take a 48,100 sq ft supermarket, swiftly re-activating the former Homebase, creating the first Sainsbury's in the local area and new jobs.
Post year end, we secured planning consent for a new 7,500 sq ft Next store, demonstrating the strong demand for the asset and our retail park portfolio.
Since acquisition we have completed a lease extension with Dunelm, introduced a new Food Warehouse and Bensons for Beds, and created a Click & Collect pod for Next.
Strategic Report
Glossary &

Owned asset, core shopping centre Newton Mearns The Avenue Shopping Centre
Located in the heart of an affluent suburb of Glasgow, The Avenue is a popular community shopping centre providing a mix of both leading national brands and quality independent local retailers, anchored by ASDA and M&S.
The centre is an immaculate and bright retail destination and benefits from over 900 free car parking spaces, as well as being well-serviced by local bus routes.
Occupational cost ratio 10.9%
Occupancy 100%
In-store sales growth accounting for online spend contribution +2.2%
Strategic Report
Our retailers perform well here, and during the year lease renewals and new lettings collectively generated £909,000 in annualised income, a +2.7% increase above the valuer's ERV, and included Timpson, Boots, Yours Clothing and Santander.
Marks & Spencer's confirmed their longterm commitment to the centre through a major store re-fit and signing of a new 15-year lease.
Activating value on surplus land and helping create new homes for the area, we exchanged on an agreement for sale of land to a housing developer, providing a capital receipt and supporting future spend for the centre.

Owned asset, former Capital & Regional shopping centre Walthamstow 17&Central Shopping Centre
Gavin Cockayne, General Manager
I genuinely love retail. My first retail job was with Burtons in 1994, part time at university. I remember one early job was as a denim expert, training the team on how to fold and sell denim.
I took the fast-track course in management and spent 20 years working in the West End of London for various companies, including Topshop on Oxford Street. I learnt a lot about what good retail looks like.
I then went into department store management in Oxford Street Debenhams and in Westfield, White City. The natural progression was shopping centre management. I was curious, having been a tenant for all those years, what it would be like from the other side as a centre manager.
I've managed the centre for three years and have been a shopping centre manager for five years. Starting off on the tenant side helps so much because it gives me a better understanding of what our occupiers need to be successful, and I have first-hand experience with operations and deliveries so I can add more value to the tenants. I find the support side of my role rewarding – working with smaller independents as well as larger nationals and helping all of the managers and owners to be part of one successful destination. Everyone should be on the same team – we all want customers to flock to the centre and spend in the shops. We have The Mall app for our tenants and have quarterly tenant meetings to discuss updates on how the previous quarter has been and progress on the development – helping tenants stay enthused and feel included.
clear NewRiver operates similarly and wants the best for every centre. It's been the smoothest transition.
The communications from NewRiver during the whole process were good and I was able to share with the rest of the team, helping everyone to feel informed every step of the way.
Our USP is the bond between the centre and our local community. Over the years, we've built excellent relationships with the local charities, community groups, and the local council. Walthamstow has been through mass gentrification over the last 10/15 years, and it just continues and evolves.
How have you found working with NewRiver since the acquisition? Very positive. I remember meeting NewRiver's Head of Asset Management for the first time, around six months before the acquisition. My first impression was great, she was so personable, knowledgeable and was genuinely excited about the potential acquisition. Since then, every interaction with each member of the NewRiver team has been great. Like Capital & Regional before, it's
Strategic Report

& Appendix
Glossary & Company Information
17&Central Shopping Centre
Our local council are brilliant; we've done a lot of great work together. The collaboration between us sets us apart. The community has a significantly strong bond and really pulls together and stands as one.
The council are very forward-thinking and have done a lot of work in the town, for example with the Soho Theatre which they acquired, a Grade II listed landmark building, which hosted the Beatles and the Rolling Stones back in the 60s. We have great relationships with the operators in the town and around the centre, and these kinds of investment are beneficial for the whole town.
We have agreed to work with the council and other key stakeholders for a social investment fund which focuses on how we can make Walthamstow even stronger, and support those who have come out of prison, or need different skills, getting back into work, those who aren't in education, who haven't had any training. This is an exciting new project.
We are a local community shopping centre and have approximately 1,000 staff from across our tenants. A huge number of these are from the borough and were recruited locally.
Portsmouth University has come to Walthamstow and plans to have 3,000 students by 2030. Their campus is just up opposite the station.
We have completed Phase 1 of the centre's redevelopment – the building of the two residential tower blocks – 495 apartments.
Phase 2 is the station box, which is underway now and will create an additional 80,000 sq ft of retail and 43 residential units. TfL will then build the station, which will improve access and pedestrian flow, and we expect that to increase our footfall.
Phases 3 & 4 will extend the centre onto the square and around the side to Lidl, with some additional retail, some low rise residential and a new public square, to reflect how the centre has transformed over the years.
All of this will make 17&Central even more of a destination and we have various major national brands seeking to come to the centre. We're looking at the transformation being complete in the next five years.
Our market-leading partnerships
Capital Partnership asset, destination shopping centre Milton Keynes Midsummer Place
Best Asset Management Initiative
When our Capital Partnership team first took on Midsummer Place, it was battling high vacancy, a stalled development and unsustainable leases. The centre, once a hub for high-end fashion, was struggling to adapt to shifting consumer habits. Today the centre is a thriving retail destination offering retail, food & beverage and leisure – and is now a place shoppers want to come, and retailers want to be.
The asset management strategy is delivering – with a well curated and enhanced occupier mix leading to a high occupancy, including the reactivation of former vacant space; together with the successful redevelopment of The Boulevard into a vibrant F&B quarter and quality upgrades to the physical environment.
Strategic Report
Developing our people
Megan Ruffell, Junior Asset Manager, NewRiver's first apprentice in 2017
My journey at NewRiver began in 2017, joining as a school leaver as the business's first apprentice through WhiteHat, a programme run by Multiverse. I was really drawn to the idea of an apprenticeship, learning on the job while gaining hands on experience felt like a valuable and practical way to build skills. During my two years as Business Administration Apprentice, I was fortunate to gain a breadth of exposure into the real estate sector, working closely with the property and finance teams, and with the support of NewRiver, I embarked on my second apprenticeship specialising in the real estate sector, going on to gain my associate RICS qualification.
An apprenticeship provides a student with hands on experience allowing them to apply their learnings to everyday tasks and projects, its an intense but highly practical learning path. The team at NewRiver made a huge impact to this – taking time to explain and giving me autonomy to grow – and the culture is fun and collaborative too which makes a big difference.
The opportunities and support NewRiver have provided me with have helped me carve out a career path I didn't know existed at school, and the career progression within the business has been exceptional.
With the support of NewRiver, I am currently in my third year of a four-year BSc (Hons) Real Estate Management degree at the University of the Built Environment, which includes the opportunity to complete my APC. I aspire to build a career in commercial real estate asset management, a field I find particularly compelling due to its dynamic nature, the diversity of stakeholders involved, the evolving landscape of retail, and the strategic challenges presented by managing retail assets.
Strategic Report
The apprenticeship programmes I have completed have all been online which can feel isolating however we have a collegiate team, and I was also encouraged to engage with NewRiver's key stakeholders as there are a number of apprentices across the business's network, that has been beneficial.
Grab the opportunity with both hands!
• Level 3 Diploma in Business Administration
October 2017 – April 2019 (18 months) Completed foundational training in business operations and administration.
• Level 3 Commercial Property Surveying Technician Apprenticeship
September 2019 – September 2021 (2 years) Gained practical and technical knowledge of commercial property surveying, leading to eligibility for Associate RICS (AssocRICS) designation.
• BSc (Hons) Real Estate Management
Currently studying (4-year undergraduate programme) This accredited degree provides a pathway to completing the RICS Assessment of Professional Competence (APC), enabling progression toward full Chartered Surveyor (MRICS) status and a career in commercial real estate asset management.

Lawrence Fisher, Head of Strategy and Investment Analysis
NewRiver portfolio in store sales growth accounting for online spend continuation (y-o-y)
+4.3%
This was a significant outperformance relative to the UK average growth in retail and supermarket spend of
Accounting for online spend contribution where the customer had previously spent in store, the year-on-year growth figure rises to
+4.9%
Robust data from across our entire business underpins our strategic decision-making.
Strategic Report
The combination of our market-leading platform, extensive geographical retail footprint and investment into data, including our partnership with Lloyds Bank, provides us with an unparalleled insight into how the UK consumer spends across the country.
Access to high-quality data allows us to make better decisions, from capital deployment to leasing, tenant mix, marketing, car park pricing and an overall asset risk assessment.
We have access to multiple data streams including:

& Appendix
Glossary & Company Information
We continue to invest in our systems and team skill-sets to carefully manage the increasing data volume we have access to whilst ensuring that we maintain strong cyber security.
We receive quarterly spend data from Lloyds Bank across 85% of our portfolio by value. This data provides us with:
Strategic Report
• Which neighbouring stores are attracting spend from our customers
As well as receiving this data for our portfolio, we also use it to inform investment decisions for potential acquisitions.
We feed this data into granular bespoke models facilitating our understanding of current profitability and rental affordability as well as forecasting future leasing events, ensuring that any rental variance assumptions within our business plans are based on robust evidence.
The application and analysis of this data touches almost every asset management decision that we make and significantly can enhance our ability to make astute decisions in the future, to further enhance our asset business plans.
We combine detailed knowledge of current performance with contributing external elements to model future behaviour and performance. We assess factors including neighbouring developments, both commercial and residential, to model the predicted profile of new residents, to understand the quantum of potential future spend available to a location. This informs what the optimum mix of retail, F&B and leisure would be to meet the needs of both consumers and occupiers, to ensure we create space that will be relevant for the medium and long term.
This in-depth analysis also informs our risk analysis to determine whether an asset should be held as a long-term investment.
& Appendix
Glossary & Company Information

Our retail portfolio, primarily centred on essential goods and services, continues to demonstrate strong operational metrics, with sustained demand across the portfolio for both new lettings and renewals. This reinforces our belief that we possess the right assets in the right locations, catering to occupiers for whom a physical store is essential.
Occupancy: 96.1% (FY24: 98.0%)
Affordable average rent: £12.93 per sq ft (FY24: £11.82 per sq ft)
Gross to Net Rent Ratio: 85%
(FY24: 88%)
Rent collection:
Retention rate: 90% (FY24: 94%)
98% (FY24: 99%) Leasing volume: 939,700 sq ft (FY24: 785,100 sq ft)
Leasing activity vs valuer ERV: +8.8%
(FY24: +3.6%)
Leasing activity vs previous passing rent:
+17.5% (FY24: +1.8%)
Average WALE on long-term leasing transactions:
4.7 months
8.6 years (FY24: 7.5 years)
Average rent free tenant incentive:
(FY24: 2.1 months)
Portfolio NIY:
7.1% (FY24: 7.6%) Capital growth:
+0.6% (FY24: -2.3%)
% of total rent:
80% (FY24: 84%)
+4.9%
yoy in the 12 months to March 2025 (accounting for online spend contribution) Average CAGR FY23-FY25:
+0.7% on 9.7 year average previous lease period
National retailer as (FY24: -0.3% over 9.9 years)
Occupational Cost Ratio (OCR):
Sales growth: 8.3%
Strategic Report
During this period, our asset team has been proactive, completing a total of 939,700 sq ft in leasing transactions, which has secured £9.6 million in annualised income. Long-term leasing transactions, which represent 76% of the total rent secured, were finalised at rents +8.8% above the valuer's estimated rental value (ERV) and +17.5% higher than the previous passing rent. Occupancy has slightly decreased to 96.1% following the acquisition of Capital & Regional which on acquisition had a lower occupancy rate than the existing NewRiver portfolio. This is temporary with new lettings in advanced legals which will return our occupancy rate to March 2024 levels.
Long-term leasing continues to outperform ERVs across Core Shopping Centres and Retail Parks, which accounted for 99% of long-term rent secured, transacting at +5.4% and +20.6% above the valuer's ERVs respectively. Our long-term leasing transactions have achieved a weighted average lease expiry ("WALE") of 8.6 years, reflecting an improvement from FY24 7.5 years, and maintaining the positive momentum observed since FY22, which recorded a WALE of 6.4 years. In terms of tenant incentives, the competitive tension in the occupational market has resulted in an average rent free period of just 4.7 months for long-term leasing transactions. This average has increased from 2.1 months in FY24 due to the longer lease terms secured.
For total portfolio lease events in FY25, achieved rents showed a positive compound annual growth rate ("CAGR") compared to the previous passing rent of +1.3% over an average previous lease period of 9.6 years. Over the past three years, this reflects a modest increase of +0.7% based on an average previous lease period of 9.7 years, highlighting the sustainability of current rental levels. We anticipate continued rental growth from this highly affordable rental base.
The NewRiver portfolio is well-located across the UK, with a focus on essential goods and services, which comprises 82% of the portfolio by rent, and spaces compatible for omnichannel businesses. Prioritising convenience-led, community-focused retail, the portfolio supports local communities and society at large whilst benefiting from a depth of demand from Discount, Value Fashion and Grocery retailers to Home, Health & Beauty, Jewellery, and Food & Beverage offerings.

& Appendix
Glossary & Company Information
| As at 31 March 2025 | Occupancy | Retention Rate |
Affordable Average Rent | Gross to Net Rent Ratio |
Leasing Volume |
Leasing Activity | Average CAGR FY23-FY25 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (%) | (%) | (£ psf) | (Ave. pa) | (%) | (sq ft) | % vs valuer ERV |
% vs previous passing rent |
(%) | (Ave. Lease Length) |
|
| Retail Parks | 97.4% | 100% | £12.68 | £136,000 | 98% | 160,400 | +20.6% | +19.1% | +0.9% | 15.5 |
| Shopping Centres– Core | 95.9% | 89% | £13.74 | £53,000 | 82% | 571,600 | +5.4% | +17.2% | +0.7% | 8.5 |
| Shopping Centres – Regeneration | 99.0% | 72% | £5.61 | £16,000 | n/a | – | – | – | -0.9% | 5.4 |
| Shopping Centres – Work Out | 93.7% | 92% | £8.12 | £14,000 | n/a | 116,600 | -8.4% | +5.1% | -1.4% | 6.4 |
| Total1 | 96.1% | 90% | £12.93 | £55,000 | 85%2 939,700 | +8.8% | +17.5% | +0.7% | 9.7 |
Total includes Other representing <1% of total portfolio by value
Gross to net ratio includes Retail Parks and Shopping Centres - Core only
As at 31 March 2025, our Retail Parks, which are strategically located near major supermarkets, comprised 21% of the portfolio's overall value. They play a crucial role in the evolving landscape of omnichannel retail with features such as free, surface-level parking, large standardised units and convenient access on key arterial routes, making these assets ideal for local fulfilment centres including click and collect, catering to consumers' preference for flexibility and ease.


Portfolio weighting: 21%
No. assets: 13
Net initial yield: 6.1%
Capital growth: +3.5%
Average value: £17.9
million
Occupancy:
Retention rate: 100%
Affordable average rent: £12.68
per sq ft
97.4% £136,000 per annum
Gross to Net Rent Ratio: 98%
Leasing volume: 160,400 sq ft
Leasing activity: +20.6% ahead of valuer's ERV Leasing activity vs previous passing rent: +19.1%
Average rent free tenant incentive: 6.1 months
Average WALE on long-term leasing transactions:
11.1 years
Average CAGR FY23-FY25:
+0.9%
on 15.5 year average previous lease period
Sales growth: +7.4%
in store sales growth accounting for online spend contribution (y-o-y)

100% retention rate Retail Parks
98% gross to net rent ratio Retail Parks
As at 31 March 2025, our Core Shopping Centre portfolio accounted for 73% of the total portfolio value across 23 community shopping centres. These centres serve as pivotal hubs within their local communities, fostering social cohesion and driving economic prosperity by providing essential goods and services. Designed with accessibility in mind, they are easily reachable with short travel times, aligning with broader climate action and well-being objectives.


Portfolio weighting: 73%
No. assets:
23
7.8%
Capital growth: +0.2%
Average value: £30.4
Occupancy:
million
Retention rate: 89%
Affordable average rent: £13.74
per sq ft
95.9% £53,000 per annum
Gross to Net Rent Ratio: 82%
Leasing volume: 571,600 sq ft
Leasing activity: +5.4% ahead of valuer's ERV Leasing activity vs previous passing rent: +17.2%
Average rent free tenant incentive:
4.1 months
Net initial yield: contribution (y-o-y) Average WALE on long-term leasing transactions:
7.7 years
+0.7%
on 8.5 year average previous lease period
Sales growth:
+4.3%
in store sales growth accounting for online spend
Company Information
• Bexleyheath, Broadway Shopping Centre: this Greater London asset serves as a hub for commuters and local residents. Anchored by retailers such as Marks & Spencer and Boots, the centre continues to sustain robust occupational momentum supported by overall year on year sales growth of +6.3%. Key achievements this year include new leases to Move South, exceeding the valuer's ERV by +36.6%, and Auntie Anne's, which successfully revitalised a long-term vacant unit. Additionally, lease renewals with established tenants such as Steads, River Island, Krispy Kreme, and Deichmann Shoes reflected significant growth, averaging +26.8% above previous passing rent.
lettings and renewals with tenants such as Bodycare, Greggs, and Watch Lab have driven a +8.9% increase above valuer's ERV. The F&B offering has been improved post period end with the completion of a new letting to Nando's on a 15 year term at the valuer's ERV which will further enhance the dwell time at the centre.

activity has been strong, with agreements for Addax, Dmart, and Shah's Halal Food exceeding the valuer's ERV by +7.9%. We also finalised an open market rent review with Asda at +8.5% above the previous passing rent. The centre is set to benefit from an adjacent new residential development comprising 495 flats across two modern buildings due to complete imminently. Phase 2 of the development will further increase the centre's local dominance with an additional 80,000 sq ft of retail space and 43 residential units.
• Wood Green, The Mall: a dominant shopping destination in London's Wood Green area, spanning 656,000 sq ft and anchored by a top performing Primark, TK Maxx, Lidl, NHS Diagnostics Centre, a Travelodge hotel and a market hall. High demand at this this location is reflected by recent lettings to tenants such as Wendy's, Ebebek, and The Perfume Shop, which surpassed the valuer's ERV by +3.7%, with existing tenants continuing to experience strong sales performance with spend growth of +4.3% year-on-year.
89% retention rate Core Shopping Centres
82% gross to net rent ratio Core Shopping Centres
Company Information
Strategic Report

We have two regeneration assets, representing only 3% of the total portfolio value, where the strategy is to deliver capital growth through redeveloping surplus retail space predominantly for residential. Our objective is to crystallise the profit from these projects in the short to medium term via sales post the receipt of a planning permission or delivery within a joint venture.
3% portfolio weighting Regeneration

& Appendix
Glossary & Company Information
The Work Out portfolio, which we identified during a review of the portfolio in 2020, represents only 3% of the total portfolio. The portfolio saw two disposals in FY25 yielding £3.9 million in gross proceeds. With only one sale left in the pipeline, the remaining focus ison executing two turnaround strategies.
3% portfolio weighting Work Out
• Cardiff, Capitol Centre: which accounts for 69% of the Work Out portfolio is set to revitalise the area and become a key leisure and retail destination. It occupies a strategic location on Queen Street, in the heart of Cardiff's bustling shopping district, and serves as the gateway to Cardiff City Council's Canal Quarter redevelopment. Planning permission has been granted for an ambitious transformation project, which includes the creation of an 80,000 sq ft Family Entertainment Centre (FEC) and the development of a new prominent entrance for The Gym, an existing tenant. We are currently finalising legals with a national operator which is expected to significantly increase annualised net income by over £1 million per year.
14 Capital Partners
21 shopping centres
18 retail parks
10.8m sq ft Capital Partnerships portfolio area Following the acquisitions of Capital & Regional and Ellandi, NewRiver now manages £2.4 billion worth of assets, including 48 Shopping Centres and 30 Retail Parks. NewRiver collects over £225 million in annual rent from 3,500 tenants, overseeing properties both independently and for its Capital Partners using a leading asset management platform.
Capital Partnerships are a key driver of growth, providing income through asset management fees, rental shares, and potential financial incentives. The acquisition of Ellandi on 3 July 2024 supports NewRiver's strategy to expand this aspect of its business, further strengthening its role as a major retail real estate asset manager in the UK.
We continue to strengthen our Capital Partnerships across three key sectors, driving significant leasing activity and strategic developments.
NewRiver is positioned to continue growing its Capital Partnership initiatives by working with new and existing retail property owners. This includes destination shopping centres, convenience-led retail spaces, retail parks, and regeneration projects with local authorities. The increasing demand for expert retail asset management highlights the value of NewRiver's approach, combining a strong geographic presence with deep market insights to enhance performance and create lasting value.

| Institutions | Asset Management |
|---|---|
| Private Equity | + Development Management |
| Debt Funds | + Financial Management |
| Banks & Administrators | + Loan Servicing |
| Local Authorities | + Acquisition & Sale Fees |
Portfolio review continued
& Appendix

Across our seven council mandates, including Canterbury City Council, Blackpool Council, and Sefton Council, we have completed 50 long-term leasing events, covering 239,000 sq ft and securing £2.2 million in annualised rent.
Across our six mandates, including BRAVO where we operate a joint venture on one retail park in Lisburn and one shopping centre in Sheffield—we have completed 90 long-term leasing events, covering 431,400 sq ft and securing £6.5 million in annualised rent.
For M&G Real Estate, we currently manage 17 retail parks and two shopping centres. In FY25, 24 long-term leasing events were completed, covering 233,700 sq ft, securing £4.6 million in annualised rent. Furthermore, we expanded the mandate having been appointed to manage Plough Lane Retail Park in Wimbledon.
NewRiver REIT plc | Annual Report and Accounts 2025 Governance Report Financial Statements ESG Data Sets 35 Strategic Report
& Appendix
Glossary & Company Information
As at 31 March 2025, our portfolio was valued at £897.5 million (31 March 2024 £543.8 million). Movements from the previous year were the acquisition of Capital & Regional, the disposal of two Work Out assets; and like-for-like valuation movement of +0.6% for the 12 months to March 2025. This was driven by ERV growth of +1.1% and stability in yields.
Our portfolio has experienced greater stability in value over the longer term compared to the wider retail market and continues to outperform the MSCI All Retail, Shopping Centre and Retail Warehouse total return benchmarks over the 3-year and 5-year period. Over a 12 month period, the portfolio grew in value by +0.6% and Income Returns outperformed the wider market by +150bps. We consider income return to be the key driver of total returns over the long-term and outperformance in income return is therefore indicative of the health of the underlying portfolio.
Growth in valuations is indicative of the portfolio's attractive yield premium relative to the market. The portfolio Net Initial Yield stands at 7.1% and has a Net Equivalent Yield of 8.4%, providing an attractive risk premium compared to the wider real estate sector and the 10-year Government Gilt rate. The yield premium relative to the MSCI All Retail benchmark, at a 5.7% Net Initial Yield and 6.6% Equivalent Yield, represents significant headroom of +140bps and +180bps respectively.
The Core Shopping Centre portfolio, accounting for 73% of the portfolio, delivered capital growth of +0.6% in the 6 months to March 2025 and +0.2% in the 12 months to March 2025. This was largely driven by ERV growth of +0.8% in the 12 months to March 2025, with yields stable. The Core Shopping Centre Net Equivalent Yield now stands at 8.8% with the movement in the period due to the acquisition of Capital & Regional, predominantly situated in London and the South East.
The Retail Park Portfolio, which represents 21% of the portfolio saw capital growth of +1.7% in the 6 months to March 2025 and +3.5% in the 12 months to March 2025. This was largely driven by ERV growth in the 12 months of +3.2% and Net Equivalent Yield movement of -30bps reflecting continued investor confidence in the sector.
The Regeneration and Work Out Portfolios experienced decline over the full year, predominantly due to movements in the first half of the year, however they now account for only 6% of the total portfolio.
"Our portfolio has experienced greater stability in value over the longer term compared to the wider retail market and continues to outperform the MSCI indexes."
Team at COOK in Locks Heath, Fareham
Portfolio review continued
| Portfolio | Valuation | Valuation | Topped | LFL EY | LFL ERV Movement |
|||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (£m) | (%) | (%) | (%) | (%) | (%) | (%) | (%) | (%) |
| 656.8 | 73% | -0.6% | +0.6% | +0.2% | 7.8% | 8.8% | +0.1% | +0.8% |
| +3.2% | ||||||||
| +0.0% | ||||||||
| +1.4% | ||||||||
| -4.1% | ||||||||
| 897.5 | 100% | -0.4% | +0.6% | +0.6% | 7.1% | 8.4% | -0.1% | +1.1% |
| 185.9 24.7 867.4 30.1 |
Weighting 21% 3% 97% 3% |
Movement H1 +1.8% -1.7% +0.1% -8.4% |
Movement H2 +1.7% -1.8% +0.7% -2.9% |
Movement FY +3.5% -3.5% +0.8% -4.5% |
Valuation up NIY 6.1% 4.0% 7.4% 1.1% |
NEY 6.5% 11.5% 8.3% 10.4% |
Movement -0.3% +0.0% -0.1% -0.3% |
As set out in the table below, our portfolio continues to outperform the MSCI Shopping Centre and Retail Warehouse benchmarks over the 3 and 5-year periods. Over a 12 month period, the portfolio Income Return outperformed the market by +150bps.
| 12 months to 31 March 2025 | Total Return Capital Growth Income Return | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| NRR Portfolio | 7.8% | 0.3% | 7.4% |
| MSCI All Retail Benchmark | 9.4% | 3.3% | 6.0% |
| Relative performance | -160 bps | -290 bps | +150 bps |
| Shopping Centres | Retail Parks | |
|---|---|---|
| Total Return: 6 months to 31 March 2025 | ||
| NewRiver | 3.6% | 6.1% |
| MSCI Benchmark | 5.4% | 5.7% |
| Relative Performance | -170 bps | +40 bps |
| Total Return: 12 months to 31 March 2025 | ||
| NewRiver | 6.4% | 11.8% |
| MSCI Benchmark | 10.2% | 12.0% |
| Relative Performance | -380 bps | -20 bps |
| Total Return: Annualised 3 years to 31 March 2025 | ||
| NewRiver | 4.4% | 7.0% |
| MSCI Benchmark | 2.0% | 2.0% |
| Relative Performance | +240 bps | +50 bps |
| Total Return: Annualised 5 years to 31 March 2025 | ||
| NewRiver | 0.7% | 8.1% |
| MSCI Benchmark | -3.9% | 5.9% |
| Relative Performance | +460 bps | +220 bps |


| Consumer | Retailer | NewRiver | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Confidence | The UK continues to be more resilient than the financial market expects. |
The occupational market is in its strongest position in a decade. |
We have the right assets in the right locations that are let to the right occupiers to serve both the wants and needs of our local communities. |
| Locations are evolving |
The evolving population of the UK, including demographic shifts, an ageing population, urban migration and changing consumer preferences, is driving demand for a more diverse mix of retailers and services. |
Changing requirements of consumers requires retailers to be agile and responsive to maintain their market position. |
Our data driven approach and deep sector knowledge means we are ideally placed to understand the evolving needs of both shoppers and retailers. |
| The True Value of the Store |
The consumer does not differentiate between purchase channels, convenience is key no matter the route to purchase. |
Physical stores continue to be essential to facilitating sales from other channels. |
Our portfolio is made up of well-located and easily accessible locations which dominate their retail catchment and are occupied by successful operators who rely on a physical store network. |
| Influence of AI on markets |
Increasing use of AI and its rapidly advancing capabilities have huge implications for how people work and how they live their lives. |
Retailers continue to have a laser focus on profitability: AI will assist them in improving cost efficiencies. |
Consumers having more time for leisure activities, creating increased profitability can be beneficial to NewRiver's portfolio. In addition, use of AI will allow us to make better, faster decisions, and improve our operational efficiency and ability to deliver market leading performance. |
Investment market
Increased conviction in shopping centres due to the underlying strength of the occupational market.
Retail parks are increasingly recognised as being highly compatible with online fulfilment, in turn driving prospects of significant rental growth.
Within our Core Shopping Centres and Retail Parks portfolios, which combined account for 94% of our owned assets, the year ending March 2025 was the second consecutive year of positive revaluation growth.
Company Information
| NewRiver REIT plc Annual Report and Accounts 2025 | Strategic Report | Governance Report | Financial Statements | ESG Data Sets & Appendix |
Glossary & Company Information |
38 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market review continued | ||||||
The retail real estate market has continued to evolve, and notwithstanding shifting consumer behaviour, macroeconomic volatility and ongoing structural changes within the sector, our marketplace is in the best position it has been for over 5-10 years.
Our business is driven by data-led insight, providing expert perspectives across the consumer, occupier, technological and capital markets. This section provides an overview of the key market trends, economic indicators and evolving sector dynamics that shaped the operating environment during our reporting period, and outlines how these external factors have influenced demand for retail space, tenant performance, investment activity and capital markets relevant to our business.
The retail sector is supported by a strong consumer and occupational market
The UK consumer continues to be more resilient than the financial markets expect
The job market continues to be strong: unemployment remains stable at 4.5%; the Lloyds Bank business barometer reports that 55% of companies plan to increase their workforce in the next 12 months; and although job vacancies have declined in the last few months, 781,000 for January-March 2025 vs 806,000 for October-December 2024, they continue to be substantially higher than pre-pandemic levels.
Wages have continued to increase at a higher rate than inflation since June 2023 (+5.5% vs +2.8% as of February 2025), assisting in offsetting recent increases in household bills, albeit the total spent on utilities by Lloyds Bank customers between April 2024 and March 2025 declined by -7.7% vs the previous year. As a result, households have experienced an increase in disposable income, with the March 2025 Asda Income tracker reporting family spending power up by +10% vs the prior year.
The housing market had a strong start to 2025; although growth in house prices slowed in the run up to the end of the stamp duty holiday, the annual growth remained strong at +2.8%, based on the Halifax House Price Index. The growth in rent has slowed down to +7.7% in March 2025, vs +9.1% the previous year. Expected cuts in interest rates will give hope to the holders of the 1.8 million 2025 fixed rate mortgages (out of a total of 12.5 million active mortgages as of December 2024) that are due to end, because new mortgage deals are expected to be lower than they might have anticipated.

| NewRiver REIT plc Annual Report and Accounts 2025 | Strategic Report | Governance Report | Financial Statements | ESG Data Sets | Glossary & | 39 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ----------------------------------------------------- | ------------------ | ------------------- | ---------------------- | --------------- | ------------ | ---- |
Consumer Credit / Savings
Market review continued

Debt to Income ratio
Source: Bank of England, ONS March 2025 Source: Research carried out by GfK, March 2025
Although there are risks around personal debt, household debt has declined as a ratio of income, aided by increased wages, while the rate of growth of consumer credit has declined over the last 12 months. In addition, increased disposable income has contributed to an increase in the household savings rate, up from a low of 4.5% at the end of June 2022 to 12.0% of income at the end of 2024.


& Appendix
XX
Glossary & Company Information
24 months to March 2025 Household savings ratio
Although consumer confidence dipped towards the end of 2024, reflecting the impact of the Autumn Budget, as of March 2025 it remains two points ahead of March 2024 and 17 points ahead of 2023, reflecting a cautious optimism among households despite economic pressures and the impact of US tariffs on confidence.
Headlines based on data from the BRC or the ONS about a slowdown in retail sales are potentially misleading. According to high quality transactional data provided by Lloyds Bank, both retail and supermarket spending delivered annual sales growth of +1.5% and +1.6% respectively. Across the same period, in store sales growth across the NewRiver portfolio was +4.3%, a significant outperformance relative to the overall UK performance.
The occupational market is in its strongest position in a decade
Although the retail sector is being impacted by increases in the National Minimum Wage (NMW) and National Insurance Contributions (NIC) following the Autumn Budget, the expected combined financial impact of an additional £5.56 billion (as predicted by Retail Economics) equates to just 1.2% of the total annual value of UK retail sales. The majority of this is expected to be either passed on to customers through price increases or absorbed by the retailers. The remainder of the increased costs will be addressed through strategies to improve efficiency and productivity, with labour optimisation one of the main areas of focus, including using technology to take over tasks such as electronic shelf price labels, returns machines and more self-service tills, reducing the requirement for staff interventions. Although portfolio rationalisation is a potential way of offsetting increased costs, the degree to which rents have already been rebased means that they account for a small proportion of overall retailer costs; as a result, Retail Economics view this as having a low impact with potential to offset the increased costs of NMW, NICs and increased business rates by just £84.4 million, 1.5% of the projected £5.56 billion impact, mitigating the risk to our income.
The biggest priority to assist in mitigating the remaining cost is supply chain optimisation, reflecting an ongoing focus on maximising profit margins across the sector, while improving resilience.
Countering increased employment costs, retailers are now benefiting from reduced freight and energy costs as well as the strength of Sterling vs US Dollars. In addition, UK retailers that source a high proportion of goods from China may be able to benefit from the excess capacity caused by the recent slowdown in trade between the USA and China.
Overall confidence (% net balance)
Business confidence

Mar-25
Source: Lloyds Bank Business Barometer, March 2025
Respectively, we see this reflected in increased confidence; the Lloyds Bank Business Barometer reports a double digit increase in overall confidence, with retail confidence reaching a post-pandemic high of +58.
| NewRiver REIT plc Annual Report and Accounts 2025 | Strategic Report | Governance Report | Financial Statements | ESG Data Sets & Appendix |
Glossary & Company Information |
41 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market review continued |


Where there have been retailer failures, this has created opportunities for rent increases, especially in the retail park sector. In addition, it creates opportunities for other occupiers to emerge and to expand. A diverse range of occupiers including Aldi, Iceland, B&M, The Range, Sketchers, Flannels, Pure Gym and Costa have all continued to expand their portfolios, whilst the competitive leisure sector continues to expand; for example Lane7 opened its first venue in 2013 and now has 17 venues across the UK (including two within our managed portfolio), with a further 3 due to be opening soon. Reflecting the growth in this sector, we have received planning permission to create an 80,000 sq ft Family Entertainment Centre at the Capitol Centre in Cardiff.
The greatest risk of retailer failure is for pureplay online retailers, which has created opportunities for physical retailers such as Frasers to improve their omnichannel offering through buying brands such as Missguided and increasing its stake in Asos.
Although there is a perception that retailers are continuing to fail; retailer failures remain below the long-term average and 2024 was the fourth quietest year for retailer distress since 2007 according to Knight Frank.
Vacancy within the sector continues to decline, aided by the expansion of a diverse range of occupiers across retail, F&B and leisure as well as continued efforts to re-purpose redundant space. Based on data from Green Street, 75% of former Debenhams have been re-purposed for new retailers or for alternative uses, including residential, workspaces and leisure uses. This includes the former Debenhams in Midsummer Place, Milton Keynes, one of our Capital Partnerships portfolio assets, which has been re-purposed to include new flagship stores for Sports Direct and Flannels, and for Lane7 in the basement. NewRiver has always deliberately avoided exposure to department stores, with no exposure to this sub-sector.
Vacancy across the NewRiver portfolio is far lower than the UK average, with a NewRiver occupancy of 96.1%. In addition retailers continue to focus on margins, however we are beginning to see evidence of rental growth for retailers with the right stores in the right locations.
Transactional data from Lloyds Bank Market Intelligence provides us with an unrivalled understanding of our shoppers.
The disparity between the relative values of each of these groups and their overall contribution to UK retail spend reflects both the nature and location of our centres, which are focused on essential goods services, together contributing 82% of retail rental income. This is reflected in the extent of our centres' catchments, with 55% of spend derived from those living within three miles of our centres, demonstrating the relevance of our centres to their local communities.
The strength of the occupational market is reflected in our leasing and occupancy statistics, with portfolio occupancy of 96.1% and 939,700 sq ft of leasing in FY25.
Our shoppers visit frequently, with an average transaction value of £16.5, reflecting our continued focus on essential retailers which serve the local community. This means our portfolio is more resilient to the potential impacts of supply chain disruption on occupier performance and consumer spend.
Considering the continued geo-political instability, it's too early to be able to understand the potential impact of the Trump tariffs on our shoppers and our occupiers, but our usage of mobility and live spending data across the portfolio means we are extremely well positioned to identify and to react to any changes in behaviour from our key shopper groups.
The implications of the Trump tariffs are still unclear, however, the consensus is that the grocery sector should be relatively unaffected. Countering the potential risk faced by non-food retailers with a bigger exposure to the USA, the slowdown in trade between the USA and China may have benefits to UK retailers which source heavily from China (such as B&M, Dunelm and Halfords), as manufacturers seek to sell excess stock at a discounted rate.
These shoppers are high earners, with a lower frequency of visit to our centres albeit with above average spend. This group commit their highest proportion of their spend to housing costs (23% vs UK average of 13%).
These are typically younger, budget conscious shoppers, with lower incomes. They visit often but have a below average spend per visit. Across the UK, a higher proportion of their spend is on retail and supermarket spend (32% and 25% respectively, vs UK average of 27% and 19%).

NewRiver portfolio
Source: Lloyds Bank Market Intelligence, March and April 2025
Middle income earners, with a large proportion of spend on essential purchases (58% vs UK average of 48%). This is reflected by this group providing the highest average visit frequency to our portfolio, with spend per visit just 4% below average.
Higher income consumers with a higher proportion of spend on non-essential purchases (69% vs UK average of 52%). Visit frequency to our centres is in line with average but above average spend per visit.
One supply chain, one platform, used by all participants in the retail journey to provide a seamless and effortless shopping experience across sales and media channels.
Strategic Report
The consumer does not differentiate between purchase channels, convenience is key no matter the route to purchase.
The line between in-store and online sales is increasingly blurred and the route to purchase can include multiple channels. Consumers do, however, expect the different channels to be well-executed with seamless integration with each channel. Consumers want the freedom and ability to browse online, visit local stores and place orders when and where they want.
Different generations have their own preferences for shopping channels, but there is a clear trend across all generations for the customer journey starting in-store. Despite being digital natives, research from Retail Economics cites that Gen Z (born between 1995 and 2009) value the instant gratification of in-store purchases as well as the opportunity for socialising with friends. Millennials (born between 1980 and 1994) are the most likely to favour 'online first' purchases due to the time constraints of busy lifestyles. In contrast, Baby Boomers (born between 1946 and 1964) are the most likely to shop in store, valuing both the touch and feel of products and the social aspect of shopping.
| Online First Store First | Net in-store | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Gen Z (1995-2009) | 36% | 63% | 27% |
| Millennials (1980-1994) | 45% | 55% | 10% |
| Gen X (1965-1979) | 39% | 62% | 23% |
| Baby Boomers (1946-1964) | 31% | 69% | 38% |
Source: Retail Economics 2023
A further attraction of physical stores is the perception of in-store purchases, the absence of delivery and return timeframes and the ability to use cash as a budgeting tool.
Physical stores continue to be essential to facilitating sales from other channels.
In-store accounts for 73% of retail sales, increasing to 91% of food store sales; however an omnichannel offer is key to retaining relevance to shoppers and physical stores are a key component of this: 13 of the UK's top 20 online retailers primarily have stores.
Click & Collect plays a prominent role within omnichannel for both retailers and consumers. Demonstrating the value of this, £733 million of additional online sales were made between April 2024 and March 2025 by shoppers who had also made a purchase in store across our portfolio, based on transactional data from Lloyds.
With a continuing focus on margins, reducing the cost of online deliveries and returns is key. Although in the future last mile deliveries will be made more efficient and cost effective through innovations such as fully autonomous drones (already being used by Walmart and DoorDash in the USA), stores continue to be essential to facilitating online store fulfilment; Marks & Spencer report that click and collect orders cost 20% less to serve than a home delivery, 45% of those collecting womenswear and menswear orders make another purchase on their trip. Meanwhile, charging for returns is encouraging shoppers to return directly to the store; this is not only cost effective but also encourages incremental purchases.
A key solution to lower costs includes leveraging pre-existing bricks and mortar: physical stores are therefore essential to facilitating sales from other channels; they have adequate stock to meet demand and replenish quickly, while stock available in locations as close as possible to customers' delivery addresses minimises the cost of logistics.
The increased cost of online marketing, with the cost per click rate on platforms such as Google and social media increasing by double digit percentages each year, also contributes to the role of stores. They provide a tangible experience that online shopping cannot replicate, while raising brand awareness: Marks and Spencer report that omnichannel sales increase by 22% in locations with a store nearby.
Glossary & Company Information
Changing requirements of consumers requires retailers to be agile and responsive to maintain their market position.
UK retailers demonstrate adaptability, a strong foundation for continued growth and innovation. Marks and Spencer, one of our top occupiers in terms of rental contribution, is an exemplary example of how adapting to changing requirements can drive performance. Several years ago, Marks and Spencer sales and profits were falling due to weak clothing sales. Between 2022 and 2024 it has increased its market share in grocery, clothing and home, and has reduced its average customer age by five years, through improving range, store format and adapting how it engages with shoppers. NewRiver has 13 Marks and Spencer stores across the portfolio, benefiting from and helping support the retailer's omni-channel strategy.
Food & Beverage continues to be a growth sector and a key driver of visits. However, the impact of inflation is changing consumer preferences, with an increased requirement for lower price options. Drive-thru units continue to be a focus for retailer expansion; the creation of three new drive-thru units at our asset, Sprucefield Retail Park, Lisburn in Northern Ireland is testament to this, with Nando's, Starbucks and Slim Chickens opening in the new purpose-built units built on surplus land adjacent to the retail parade. New entrants such as Wingstop continue to expand, and have opened at three of our assets – in The Mall in Wood Green, Midsummer Place in Milton Keynes and The Broadway in Bradford over the last few months. Greggs continues to perform well and is a key tenant with 29 stores across our portfolio, and its confidence in our locations is reflected in its decision to upsize in a number of locations, including The Moor in Sheffield.
The UK population is expected to increase by +7% by 2032, with the biggest increase being in the over 65's (+21%), driving demand for a broad mix of retailers and services. Our centres are easily accessible and are focused on the needs of the local community. Additional health facilities can help boost retail performance; the BBC has reported that users of an NHS town centre scanning centre spent an average of £17 in local businesses when they visit.
It's increasingly important that town and shopping centres provide more than purely shopping to maintain their relevance to all generations. One example of this is through the provision of health services; to date we have 82 health and dental services across the portfolio, including NHS centres in The Exchange, Ilford and The Mall, Wood Green, accounting for 705,000 sq ft of space, and we continue to assess opportunities for further provision.
Across all generations there is an increasing awareness of the need to reduce our carbon footprint. Our centres are ideally placed to support this, being easily accessible on foot and well connected by public transport, putting them firmly at the heart of their communities.

Our data driven approach and deep sector knowledge means we are ideally placed to understand the evolving needs of both shoppers and retailers.
Lloyds Bank transactional data not only helps us to understand the performance of occupiers within our centres, but also the contribution that different customer groups make and how this is evolving over time. We apply this data to the business plans of each assets to ensure that our tenant mix remains relevant, supporting the sustainability of our rental cashflows, as well as informing how our centres engage with their customers, through a better understanding of their profiles, their journey to our centres, the order in which they visit retailers, which other neighbouring stores they visit and which brands they engage with online.

A shopper in M&S in Broadway Shopping Centre, Bexleyheath

Our portfolio is made up of well-located and easily accessible locations which dominate their retail catchment and are occupied by successful operators who rely on a physical store network.
Offline / Online (%)

Online In-store
Source: CACI Brand Dimensions, April 2025
The Lloyds Bank transactional data allows us to have a detailed understanding of the role our portfolio plays in facilitating online sales.
For FY25 shoppers across the NewRiver portfolio generated an additional
of online sales for occupiers within their local centres.
Of our top 10 retailers, sales within physical stores account for more than
confirming their ongoing requirement for physical stores.
NewRiver REIT plc | Annual Report and Accounts 2025 Governance Report Financial Statements ESG Data Sets 46
Strategic Report
& Appendix
Glossary & Company Information
Market review continued
As usage and capabilities of AI increase, the impact on how we work and live will be profound, with significant opportunities and risks associated with this
Increasing use of AI and its rapidly advancing capabilities has huge implications for how people work and how they live their lives.
The evolution of the capabilities of AI is faster than anything we have seen before and is impacting all aspects of our lives.
One major element that consumers are already starting to benefit from is the additional time they have available through using AI to make daily routine tasks more efficient, giving more time for leisure activities.
CACI research shows that 48% of consumers are comfortable with AI supporting their day to day life while 42% feel optimistic about AI saving time and making things easy.
Increasing use of AI and its rapidly advancing capabilities has huge implications for how people work and how they live their lives. KPMG report that it is expected to significantly reshape the UK job market, potentially displacing jobs in certain sectors while creating new opportunities in AI-related fields, potentially leading to a net neutral or even positive impact on overall employment levels.
The British Medical Association believes that AI will also have a significant impact on healthcare and health outcomes. Enhanced diagnostic accuracy, through early detection and using predictive analytics to proactively manage potential health risks, alongside personalised treatment plans and accelerated research to develop new treatments will not only enhance quality of life but will also contribute to longer life expectancy and reduced healthcare costs. Our centres are ideally placed to assist in this through curating health focused businesses and collaborating with healthcare providers to offer wellness programmes, health screening and diagnostic centres, such as the NHS Diagnostic Centre at our centre, The Mall in Wood Green.
Retailers continue to have a laser focus on profitability: AI will assist them in improving cost efficiencies.
In 2023, Knight Frank noted that retail had lagged behind more 'AI mature' industries such as finance but it is now set to be amongst the top industry beneficiaries, and is forecasted to achieve above average increases to profitability.
More accurate AI based forecasting allows retailers to bridge gaps in supply chain. It is also possible to determine inventory for individual stores, better accommodating the wants and needs of shoppers and boosting sales, as well as scheduling staff to meet peak demands.
Use of AI and associated technology aids efficiencies in all areas of retail operations including fulfilment of deliveries, both to end customers and to stores – the introduction of Kiva Robots at an Amazon warehouse reduced the time required to fulfil items by 78%. Online customer support is largely provided through AI chatbots, reducing the need for human input.
As AI has evolved from Generative (creating content) to Agentic (able to think and reason like humans), its capabilities are increasing exponentially, accelerating the impact on bottom lines. For example, product development is easier and quicker, while marketing materials are quicker and cheaper to create. Through use of AI, retailers can provide better personalisation, using behaviour and purchase history.
The use of AI will allow us to make better, faster decisions and improve our operational efficiency and our ability to deliver market leading performance. The use of AI by our occupiers to improve profitability will also prove beneficial to NewRiver's portfolio. Our AI working group is focused on understanding existing and future AI uses across the business to shape recommendations on how AI can be used, with appropriate safeguards in place, to improve decision making and to drive efficiencies.
Retail is a fast moving and dynamic market and is more operational for both owners and occupiers of retail real estate. For several years we have invested in our systems, including Data Freedom, our interactive dashboard containing live comprehensive asset information, to carefully manage the increasing volume of data that we are accessing.
However the power and value of any data set comes from the interpretation and application of the findings. We use the insight derived from our data on the millions of customers who visit our assets to inform and improve our strategy across all aspects of the business, including capital deployment, leasing, tenant mix, marketing, car park pricing and the overall risk assessment of an asset.
Using AI will build on our existing strengths and expertise, and will help us make faster decisions based on the insight it generates.
The Gym at Broadway Square in Bexleyheath

Transaction volumes across the commercial real estate investment market rebounded in 2024, +21% versus 2023 as the prospect of rates reductions stimulated activity.
The MSCI March 2025 Quarterly Index reported growth across all sectors, with the All Property index at +1.4%, Industrial at +4.7%, Supermarkets at +1.9%, Retail Warehouses at +5.5% and Shopping Centres at +3.2%, save for Offices which reported negative capital growth of -2.5% over the period. The current volatile macro environment has impacted volumes in the first quarter of 2025, however, the consensus is that Retail's outperformance in 2024 was not a one off and is set to continue through 2025.
According to the IPF consensus forecast (Autumn 2024), Shopping Centres and Retail Warehouses are set to deliver a total return outperformance over the next five years versus the All-Property average of 7.7%. This is reflective of the attractive risk adjusted returns the sector offers, driven by the day 1 income return and prospects of future rental growth.




NewRiver REIT plc | Annual Report and Accounts 2025 Governance Report Financial Statements ESG Data Sets 49
Market review continued
Shopping Centre investment reached £2.0 billion in 2024, a +70% increase in volumes on the previous year and the highest annual total since 2016.
The Shopping Centre investment market has seen the return of the institutional investor for centres serving the destination shopping journey, predominately at a larger lot size. This is a result of the increased conviction in the subsector, due to the underlying strength of the occupational market and rebased, stable capital values, in addition to the high income return component.
The availability of credit has also returned due to these factors, with lenders also providing higher LTVs at lower margins, driving further liquidity in the market and broader depth of buyer.
Increased conviction in shopping centres due to the underlying strength of the occupational market.

There were £3.3 billion of total transactions recorded in 2024, a +75% increase relative to the previous year and aligned to 2021 which was the second highest year in the past decade.
& Appendix
Investors, especially UK funds, REITs and international investors who have been the key buyers, remain attracted by the favourable supply/demand imbalance and increasing recognition that retail parks are highly compatible with online fulfilment which is driving the prospects of significant rental growth. Recent retail failures impacting the sub-sector, including Carpetright, Homebase and Hobbycraft, have presented opportunities to realise rental growth on new lettings due to the limited available space nationally, according to MSCI this currently sits at only 3.1%.
Strategic Report
Retail parks are increasingly recognised as being highly compatible with online fulfilment, in turn driving prospects of significant rental growth.

Source: Savills until 2023 & Knight Frank there after Source: Savills until 2023 & Knight Frank there after
Glossary &
Market review continued
Within our Core Shopping Centres and Retail Parks portfolios, which combined accounts for 94% of our owned assets, the year ending March 2025 was the second consecutive year of positive revaluation growth.

Company Information
NewRiver REIT plc | Annual Report and Accounts 2025 Governance Report Financial Statements ESG Data Sets 51 Glossary & Strategic Report
& Appendix
Chief Financial Officer's review
It has been an active and transformational year for the business, during which we have completed two strategically important transactions, the most significant of which was the acquisition of Capital & Regional, which materially increased our scale and has already benefitted UFFO per share and our dividend, without sacrificing the strength of our financial position.
Will Hobman Chief Financial Officer
Company Information
Our property portfolio has increased in size from £543.8 million at 31 March 2024 to £897.5 million at 31 March 2025, due partly to a 0.6% increase in property valuation but principally due to the acquisition of Capital & Regional which completed on 10 December 2024. The acquisition also increased our EPRA Net Tangible Assets from £361.8 million at 31 March 2024 to £487.5 million at 31 March 2025. EPRA NTA per share reduced from 115 pence at 31 March 2024 to 106 pence at 30 September 2024, predominantly as a result of the dilution from the equity placing in September 2024 which was used to part fund the acquisition and was conducted at a discount to 31 March 2024 NTA per share but importantly at a slight premium to closing price prior to launch. NTA per share reduced to 102 pence at 31 March 2025, in-line with post transaction proforma guidance, due mainly to acquisition costs.
Maintaining the strength of the financial position of the enlarged business was a key priority when structuring the acquisition, and as a consequence we ended the year with significant cash reserves of £62 million and in compliance with our financial policies with LTV of 42.3%, net debt to EBITDA of 5.4x and an interest cover ratio of 6.0x. While LTV at the year end was comfortably within policy of <50% and in-line with post transaction proforma communicated in our half year results materials, it was marginally ahead of our guidance of <40%. At the time of the Capital & Regional acquisition we were clear we intended to reduce to within guidance through a modest and achievable level of disposals, and immediately post year end we completed the disposal of the Abbey Centre in Newtownabbey, which reduced our LTV to c.38% meaning we are within guidance with capacity to invest into accretive asset acquisitions.
UFFO for the year ended 31 March 2025 was £30.5 million, up from £24.4 million for the year ended 31 March 2024, reflecting the benefit of acquisition activity completed during the second half of the financial year in which UFFO of £19.0 million accelerated from £11.5 million for the six months ended 30 September 2024, including the seasonality in the Snozone business acquired as part of the Capital & Regional transaction. On a per share basis, UFFO increased from 3.7 pence for the six months ended 30 September 2024 to 4.4 pence in the second half, an increase of 19% as the earnings accretion from the Capital & Regional transaction, including the seasonality in the Snozone business, has taken effect. Our dividends are linked directly to UFFO per share, which means that as our UFFO per share has increased in the second half of the year, so too has our dividend. Having declared an interim dividend of 3.0 pence per share in December 2024, the Board is pleased to declare a final dividend relating to the second half of the financial year of 3.5 pence per share. This brings the total FY25 dividend declared to 6.5 pence per share, representing 80% of UFFO and in-line with our dividend policy. The dividend is payable on 8 August 2025 and goes ex-dividend on 19 June 2025.
"The acquisition of Capital & Regional materially increased our scale and has already benefitted UFFO per share and our dividend."
The Group financial statements are prepared under IFRS, where the Group's interests in joint ventures and associates are shown as a single line item on the income statement and balance sheet. Management reviews the performance of the business principally on a proportionally consolidated basis which includes the Group's share of joint ventures and associates on a line-by-line basis. The Group's financial key performance indicators are presented on this basis.
In addition to information contained in the Group financial statements, Alternative Performance Measures ('APMs'), being financial measures that are not specified under IFRS, are also used by management to assess the Group's performance. These include a number of the financial statistics included in this document being UFFO, LTV, occupancy, admin cost ratio, ICR, GRESB score, Total Property Return and Total Accounting Return. These APMs include a number of EPRA measures, prepared in accordance with the EPRA Best Practice Recommendations reporting framework, which are summarised in the 'Alternative Performance Measures' section at the end of this document. We report these measures because management considers them to improve the transparency and relevance of our published results as well as the comparability with other listed European real estate companies. Definitions for APMs are included in the Glossary and the most directly comparable IFRS measure is also identified. The measures used in the review below are all APMs presented on a proportionally consolidated basis unless otherwise stated.
The APM on which management places most focus, reflecting the Company's commitment to driving income returns, is UFFO. UFFO measures
the Company's operational profits, which includes other income and excludes one off or non-cash adjustments, such as portfolio valuation movements, profits or losses on the disposal of investment properties, fair value movements on derivatives and share-based payment expense. We consider this metric to be the most appropriate for measuring the underlying performance of the business as it is familiar to non-property investors, and better reflects the Company's generation of profits. It is for this reason that UFFO is used to measure dividend cover.
In our half year results, we presented LTV, Cash, ICR and net debt to EBITDA on a pro forma basis to give readers of the accounts more information on what the Group would look like on completion of the acquisition of Capital & Regional. This was especially important because as at 30 September 2024, NewRiver had raised net equity proceeds of £48.9 million to part fund the transaction, which was not deployed until the transaction completed on 10 December 2024, immediately prior to the publication of the half year results on 12 December 2024. For example, LTV was 21.6% at 30 September 2024, reflecting the beneficial impact of the undeployed net equity proceeds, but LTV was expected to be c.42% proforma for the transaction completion, which was disclosed within our half year results materials and is in-line with the LTV of 42.3% at 31 March 2025. Now that the transaction has completed, we have not produced proformas again in this set of results as there is no need to produce cash and LTV measures and we do not believe it is necessary to produce net debt to EBITDA or ICR.
The relevant sections of this Finance Review contain supporting information, including reconciliations to the financial statements and IFRS measures. The 'Alternative Performance Measures' section also provides references to where reconciliations can be found between APMs and IFRS measures.
| NewRiver REIT plc Annual Report and Accounts 2025 | Strategic Report | Governance Report | Financial Statements | ESG Data Sets & Appendix |
Glossary & Company Information |
53 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chief Financial Officer's review continued |
The following table reconciles IFRS profit after taxation to UFFO, which is the Company's measure of underlying operational profits.
| 31 March 2025 £m |
31 March 2024 £m |
|
|---|---|---|
| Profit for the year after taxation | 23.7 | 3.0 |
| Adjustments | ||
| Net property valuation movement | (2.1) | 13.9 |
| Net property valuation movement – joint ventures' and associates' | 0.1 | – |
| Loss on disposal of investment properties | 0.7 | 3.8 |
| Changes in fair value of financial instruments | – | (0.1) |
| Exceptional costs1 | 0.7 | – |
| Amortisation of intangibles2 | 0.3 | – |
| Write off of unamortised debt costs3 | 0.9 | – |
| Costs to unlock transaction synergies4 | 1.1 | – |
| Loss on disposal of joint venture | – | 2.3 |
| Deferred tax5 | 3.0 | – |
| EPRA Earnings | 28.4 | 22.9 |
| Forward looking element of IFRS 96 | 0.1 | – |
| Snozone depreciation, amortisation and lease liability interest7 | 0.5 | – |
| Share-based payments charge | 1.5 | 1.5 |
| Underlying Funds From Operations | 30.5 | 24.4 |
Exceptional costs comprise expenses relating to the acquisition of Ellandi
Amortisation of intangibles relates to the amortisation of the intangible asset recognised on the acquisition of Ellandi
Write off of unamortised costs following repayment of three Capital & Regional secured debt facilities totalling £59 million immediately post transaction completion
Costs to unlock comprise net costs in relation to unlocking expected net cost synergies following the acquisition of Capital & Regional e.g. redundancy and head office costs
Deferred tax adjustment acquired with the acquisition of Capital & Regional, since written off
Forward looking element of IFRS 9 relates to a provision against debtor balances in relation to invoices in advance for future rental income. These balances are not due in the current year and therefore no income has been recognised in relation to these debtors.
Adjustment to remove depreciation and the profiling impact of IFRS 16
Underlying Funds From Operations is presented on a proportionally consolidated basis in the following table.
| 31 March 2025 | 31 March 2024 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Group £m |
JVs & Associates £m |
Adjustments1 £m |
Proportionally consolidated £m |
Proportionally consolidated £m |
|
| Revenue | 90.5 | 0.8 | (11.7) | 79.6 | 66.5 |
| Property operating expenses | (34.3) | (0.2) | 5.3 | (29.2) | (20.9) |
| Net property income | 56.2 | 0.6 | (6.4) | 50.4 | 45.6 |
| Administrative expenses | (18.5) | – | 6.9 | (11.6) | (11.0) |
| Other income | – | – | 3.7 | 3.7 | 0.4 |
| Operating profit | 37.7 | 0.6 | 4.2 | 42.5 | 35.0 |
| Net finance costs | (12.3) | (0.5) | 0.9 | (11.9) | (10.6) |
| Taxation | – | (0.1) | – | (0.1) | – |
| Underlying Funds From Operations | 30.5 | 24.4 | |||
| UFFO per share (pence) | 8.1 | 7.8 | |||
| Ordinary dividend per share (pence) |
6.5 | 6.6 | |||
| Ordinary dividend cover | 125% | 118% | |||
| Admin cost ratio | 14.1% | 15.7% | |||
| Weighted average # shares (m) | 376.3 | 311.4 |
Company Information
| Analysis of net property income (£m) | |
|---|---|
| Net property income for the year ended 31 March 2024 | 45.6 |
| NPI Core | 6.8 |
| NPI Work Out and Other | (2.4) |
| Asset management fees | 0.4 |
| Net property income for the year ended 31 March 2025 | 50.4 |
On a proportionally consolidated basis, net property income was £50.4 million in FY25, compared to £45.6 million in FY24. This was predominantly due to the impact of the acquisition of Capital & Regional which completed on 10 December 2024, offset slightly by disposals completed, principally from the Work Out portfolio.
Through the Capital & Regional transaction in December 2024 we acquired six community shopping centres which are now included in our Core portfolio and have contributed to an increase in net property income of £6.8 million.
Net property income within Work Out and Other has decreased by £2.4 million, predominately due to the disposal of four Work Out assets during the second half of FY24 and during FY25. Following these disposals, Work Out only represents 3% of our total portfolio.
Asset management fees increased by £0.4 million, or 16%, to £2.9 million during the year, principally due to the acquisition of Ellandi, an established asset and development management business focused on UK retail and regeneration, in July 2024. We have now unlocked the operational cost synergies identified within Ellandi and expect that, having made a modest contribution to UFFO in the second half of FY25, the business will make an increased contribution in FY26 and beyond.
Administrative expenses have increased from £11.0 million in FY24 to £11.6 million in FY25, primarily due to inflationary pressures on pay rises, averaging 3% across our workforce, which constitute the majority of our overheads. We have mitigated the effects of the inflationary rises in payroll related costs by achieving targeted savings across the remainder of our administrative costs. The acquisition of Capital & Regional contributed a modest £0.2 million to the increase in administrative costs during FY25.
We have made good progress in unlocking the £6.2 million of annual net cost synergies identified as part of the Capital & Regional acquisition, which were based on administrative expenses net of property management income of £6.9 million reported by Capital & Regional in the year ended 30 December 2023 and which we expect to have fully unlocked within 12 months of completion on an annualised basis.
Details of any material related party transactions that occurred during the current year are provided in Note 27 of the Notes to the Interim Financial Statements.
Other income of £3.7 million recognised in FY25 relates to Snozone EBITDA. We acquired Snozone, the largest indoor ski slope operator in the UK, as part of the Capital & Regional transaction on 10 December 2024. This contribution exceeds Snozone's annual EBITDA, as our period of ownership since acquisition encompasses Snozone's peak trading season, without its period of controlled loss (i.e. May – September), such that we have benefitted from the seasonality of income within the Snozone business during FY25.
& Appendix
In the prior year, other income of £0.4 million related to a settlement of an income disruption insurance claim in relation to loss of earnings on our commercialisation and turnover rent income during the period impacted by Covid. All historical claims relating to Covid have now been settled and as such no other income has been recognised in FY25.
Net finance costs increased from £10.6 million in FY24 to £11.9 million in FY25. Through our acquisition of Capital & Regional, we acquired four secured debt facilities totalling £199 million of gross debt. We repaid three of these facilities immediately following transaction completion, totalling £59 million and with a blended coupon of 6.1%, and retained the £140 million Mall facility which has a coupon of 3.45%. This means that following the completion of the acquisition in December 2024, our gross debt increased to £444 million from £304 million at the start of FY25, increasing our net finance costs.
As a REIT, we are exempt from UK corporation tax in respect of our qualifying UK property rental income and gains arising from direct and indirect disposals of exempt property assets. The majority of the Group's income is therefore tax free as a result of its REIT status, albeit this exemption does not extend to other sources of income such as interest or asset management fees.
Company Information
Under our dividend policy, we declare dividends equivalent to 80% of UFFO twice annually at the Company's half and full year results, calculated with reference to the most recently completed six-month period.
The Company is a member of the REIT regime whereby profits from its UK property rental business are tax exempt. The REIT regime only applies to certain property-related profits and has several criteria which have to be met, including that at least 90% of our profit from the property rental business must be paid as dividends. We intend to continue as a REIT for the foreseeable future, and therefore our policy allows the final dividend to be "topped-up", including where required to ensure REIT compliance, such that the payout in any financial year may be higher than our base policy position of 80% of UFFO.
In-line with this policy, in December 2024 the Board declared an interim dividend of 3.0 pence per share in respect of the six months ended 30 September 2024, based on 80% of UFFO per share of 3.7 pence. The Board has today declared a final dividend of 3.5 pence per share in respect of the year ended 31 March 2025, taking the total FY25 dividend declared to 6.5 pence, equivalent to 80% of UFFO per share of 8.1 pence. The final dividend of 3.5 pence per share in respect of the year ended 31 March 2025 will, subject to shareholder approval at the 2025 AGM, be paid on 8 August 2025. The ex-dividend date will be 19 June 2025 with an associated record date of 20 June 2025. The dividend will be payable as a REIT Property Income Distribution (PID).
EPRA NTA includes a number of adjustments to the IFRS reported net assets and both measures are presented below on a proportionally consolidated basis.
& Appendix
| As at 31 March 2025 |
As at 31 March 2024 |
|||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Group £m |
JVs & Associates £m |
Proportionally consolidated £m |
Proportionally consolidated £m |
|
| Properties at valuation1 | 887.5 | 10.0 | 897.5 | 543.8 |
| Right of use asset | 69.6 | – | 69.6 | 75.6 |
| Investment in JVs & associates | 5.3 | (5.3) | – | – |
| Other non-current assets | 8.3 | – | 8.3 | 0.3 |
| Cash | 61.3 | 0.8 | 62.1 | 133.2 |
| Other current assets | 22.1 | 0.1 | 22.2 | 11.8 |
| Total assets | 1,054.1 | 5.6 | 1,059.7 | 764.7 |
| Other current liabilities | (53.4) | (0.4) | (53.8) | (26.7) |
| Lease liability | (73.6) | – | (73.6) | (75.6) |
| Borrowings2 | (437.0) | (4.3) | (441.3) | (300.5) |
| Other non-current liabilities | – | (0.9) | (0.9) | (0.8) |
| Total liabilities | (564.0) | (5.6) | (569.6) | (403.6) |
| IFRS net assets | 490.1 | – | 490.1 | 361.1 |
| EPRA adjustments: | ||||
| Goodwill3 | (3.6) | – | ||
| Intangible asset3 | (0.9) | – | ||
| Deferred tax | 0.9 | 0.8 | ||
| Fair value financial instruments | – | (0.1) | ||
| EPRA NTA | 486.5 | 361.8 | ||
| EPRA NTA per share4 | 102p | 115p | ||
| IFRS net assets per share5 | 103p | 116p | ||
| LTV | 42.3%6 | 30.8% |
See Note 14 for a reconciliation between Properties at valuation and categorisation per Consolidated balance sheet
Principal value of gross debt, less unamortised fees
Goodwill and intangible assets recognised on the acquisition of Ellandi are removed from the EPRA NTA calculation as per EPRA guidelines
Calculated with reference to 478.9 million shares (2024: 313.3 million shares), see Note 12
Calculated with reference to 475.5 million shares (2024: 310.4 million shares), see Note 12
Proforma for £59m post year end disposal of the Abbey Centre, Newtownabbey, in-line with March-2025 book value, LTV reduces to c.38%
| & Appendix | ||
|---|---|---|
As at 31 March 2025, IFRS net assets were £490.1 million, increasing from £361.1 million at 31 March 2024, primarily due to the acquisition of Capital & Regional, which was funded by a combination of cash and shares. EPRA NTA is calculated by adjusting net assets to reflect the potential impact of dilutive ordinary shares, and to remove the fair value of any derivatives, deferred tax, goodwill and intangible assets held on the balance sheet. These adjustments are made with the aim of improving comparability with other European real estate companies. EPRA NTA increased by 34.5%, from £361.8 million to £486.5 million, again due to the acquisition of Capital & Regional.
EPRA NTA per share reduced from 115 pence at 31 March 2024 to 106 pence at 30 September 2024, predominantly as a result of the dilution from the equity placing in September 2024, which was used to part fund the acquisition and was conducted at a discount to 31 March 2024 NTA per share but importantly at a slight premium to the closing price prior to launch, and also due to the acquisition of Ellandi which generated goodwill and an intangible asset of £4.8 million which is excluded from the EPRA NTA calculation. NTA per share reduced to 102 pence at 31 March 2025, in–line with post transaction proforma guidance, due mainly to acquisition costs.
Properties at valuation increased from £543.8 million as at 31 March 2024 to £897.5 million as at 31 March 2025, due partly to a 0.6% increase in property valuation but principally due to the Capital & Regional transaction through which we acquired six community shopping centres, predominantly located in London and the South East of England and now included within our Core Shopping Centre portfolio.
| Proportionally consolidated | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| 31 March 2025 30 September 2024 | 31 March 2024 | ||
| Weighted average cost of debt – drawn only1 | 3.5% | 3.5% | 3.5% |
| Weighted average debt maturity – drawn only1 | 2.6 yrs | 3.4 yrs | 3.9 yrs |
| Weighted average debt maturity – total2 | 2.4 yrs | 3.1 yrs | 3.6 yrs |
Weighted average cost of debt and weighted average debt maturity on drawn debt only
Average debt maturity excludes two one–year extension options on the RCF and a one–year extension option on The Mall facility. Assuming these options are exercised and lender approved, weighted average debt maturity on total debt at 31 March 2025 increases to 3.0 years
| Proportionally consolidated | 31 March 2025 £m |
30 September 2024 £m |
31 March 2024 £m |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cash | 62.1 | 184.8 | 133.2 |
| Principal value of gross debt | (444.3) | (304.3) | (304.0) |
| Net debt1 | (379.2) | (116.6) | (167.3) |
| Drawn RCF | – | – | – |
| Total liquidity2 | 162.1 | 284.8 | 233.2 |
| Gross debt (drawn/acquired) / repaid in the year / period |
(199.3) / 59.0 | (0.3) | 12.0 |
| Loan to Value | 42.3% | 21.6% | 30.8% |
Including unamortised arrangement fees
Cash and undrawn RCF
Proforma for £59m post year end disposal of the Abbey Centre, Newtownabbey, in-line with March-2025 book value, LTV reduces to c.38%
As at 31 March 2024, cost of debt and weighted average debt maturity were closely aligned to the profile of our unsecured corporate bond, because it accounted for £300 million of total gross debt of £304 million. Immediately following the completion of the acquisition of Capital & Regional we repaid the three more expensive of its four secured debt facilities, totalling £59 million with a blended coupon of 6.1%, and retained the Mall facility, which at £140 million with a coupon of 3.45% was the largest and cheapest of the Capital & Regional facilities. Gross debt increased to £444 million at 31 March 2025, due entirely to the Mall facility. Our weighted average cost remained unchanged during FY25, because the coupon on the Mall facility is aligned with that of our existing unsecured corporate bond, and our weighted average debt maturity reduced to 2.6 years from 3.9 years 31 March 2024 because the Mall facility matures in January 2027, compared to the existing unsecured corporate bond which matures in March 2028.
Our balance sheet remains 68% unsecured as at 31 March 2025, reduced from 100% at 31 March 2024 because the Mall facility is secured. Looking forward, and with our increased scale following the acquisition of Capital & Regional and investment grade credit ratings reaffirmed by Fitch Ratings in September 2024, we expect to be active in the debt markets over the next twelve months in order to manage our debt maturity profile.
Chief Financial Officer's review continued
We have five financial policies in total, including LTV and Interest cover which also appear as debt covenants on our unsecured RCF and our bond. These form a key component of our financial risk management strategy which remains as important as ever given the macro-economic climate.
We are in compliance with all financial policies as at 31 March 2025.
| Measure | Financial policy | Proportionally consolidated | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 31 March 2025 30 September 2024 | 31 March 2024 | |||
| Loan to Value | Guidance <40% | |||
| Policy <50% | 42.3%1 | 21.6% | 30.8% | |
| Group | ||||
| 31 March 2025 30 September 2024 | 31 March 2024 | |||
| Balance sheet gearing | <100% | 76.7% | 27.5% | 45.4% |
| Proportionally consolidated | ||||
| 31 March 2025 | HY25 | FY24 | ||
| Net debt: EBITDA2 | <10x | 5.4x / 8.9x | 4.7x / 3.5x | 4.8x / 4.8x |
| Interest cover3 | >2.0x | 6.0x | 7.4x | 6.5x |
| Ordinary dividend cover4 | >100% | 125% | 125% | 118% |
Proforma for £59m post year end disposal of the Abbey Centre, Newtownabbey, in-line with March-2025 book value, LTV reduces to c.38%
Net debt: EBITDA calculated using the average net debt over the last 12 months is 5.4x (HY25: 4.7x) (FY24: 4.8x). Net debt: EBITDA calculated using year end net debt at 31 March 2025 was 8.9x due to the completion of the acquisition of Capital & Regional on 10 December 2024 so only received 112 days of EBITDA in FY25. Net debt: EBITDA calculated using period end net debt at 30 September 2024 was 3.5x due to the completion of equity placing and retail offer in September
Interest cover calculated on a 12 month look-back basis, consistent with debt covenant
Ordinary dividend cover calculated with reference to UFFO
LTV reduced from 30.8% at 31 March 2024 to 21.6% at 30 September 2024, predominantly due to the successful equity placing and retail offer in September 2024 which raised net proceeds of £48.9 million to part fund the acquisition of Capital & Regional, before increasing to 42.3% at 31 March 2025 following the transaction, which remained comfortably within policy (<50%). At this level, LTV was in-line with the expected post transaction proforma position but slightly above our guidance of <40%. At the time of the Capital & Regional acquisition we were clear we intended to reduce LTV to within guidance through a modest and achievable level of disposals, and immediately post year end we completed the disposal of the Abbey Centre in Newtownabbey, which reduced our LTV to c.38% meaning we are within guidance with capacity to invest into accretive asset acquisitions. Considering LTV alongside our net debt to EBITDA (5.4x) and Interest Cover ratios (6.0x), our financial position remains strong and we are comfortably in compliance with all financial policies.
Alongside our financial policies we have a number of additional guidelines used by management to analyse operational and financial risk, which we disclose in the following table:
| Guideline | 31 March 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
| Single retailer concentration | <5% of gross income | 3.6% (Boots) |
| Development expenditure | <10% of GAV | <1% |
| >70% pre-let or pre-sold | ||
| Risk-controlled development | on committed | N/A, no developments on site |
We are pleased with continued operational performance of the underlying NewRiver business, the growth embedded within the business following our acquisition activity and the strength of our financial position.
Looking forward, we are focused on continuing to unlock the cost synergies identified as part of the Capital & Regional acquisition, delivering further UFFO per share accretion, and achieving our medium-term target of a consistent 10% total accounting return.
Will Hobman Chief Financial Officer
In what has been a transformational year for NewRiver, we have continuously focused on the impact and outcome for each of the various stakeholders across our business. We recognise that our long-term success is founded on strong and transparent two-way relationships with our stakeholders, and understanding the evolving needs and expectations of each.
Critical to effective Corporate Governance is how the Board aligns strategic decisions with the Company's purpose, values, strategy and stakeholders. The NewRiver Board has a clear stakeholder engagement plan, regularly consulting with the NewRiver Executive Directors and wider team, who in turn manage and foster the relationships with core stakeholders.

The Directors, both individually and collectively, believe that they have acted in good faith in a manner they consider most likely to promote the success of the Company for the benefit of its members as a whole (having regard to the stakeholders and matters set out in section 172(1)(a-f) of the Companies Act 2006) in the decisions taken during the year ended 31 March 2025.
Details of our key stakeholders and how the Board engages with them can be found here in our Stakeholder Engagement Report. Further details of the Board activities and principal decisions are set out on page 120 providing insight into how the Board makes decisions and their link to strategy. Other disclosures relating to our consideration of the matters set out in s172(1) (a-f) of Act can be found as follows:
| S172 factor | Our approach |
|---|---|
| the likely consequence of any decision in the long term |
As a Board of a REIT owning assets which also include a risk-controlled development pipeline, the Board is always conscious of the long term. Looking to the future the Board and Executive Committee regularly assess the overall corporate strategy and acquisition, asset management and disposal decisions in the context of current and future long-term trends and markets. We closely assess the latest trends reported by our research providers, to ensure we are aligned with evolving trends. These insights and the Board's own extensive experience steer the long-term strategic direction. |
| the interests of the company's employees |
Our small workforce facilitates close proximity between staff and the Board, making it easy for the Board to engage directly with employees, especially since the Directors regularly visit the London office and other sites. This year Directors have visited assets, spent time in the London office and attended an enhanced programme of social events with staff. |
| the need to foster the | The Board is committed to fostering the Company's business relationships with occupiers, local authorities and |
| company's business | other stakeholders. These stakeholders are key to our business model and therefore the Executive Directors (including |
| relationships with suppliers, | Board members) have direct responsibilities for managing and developing these relationships. Board site visits during |
| customers and others | the year have helped in developing these relationships and understanding the needs of these stakeholders. |
| the impact of the company's | The Board is committed to our communities and our assets are integral to the communities they serve. We aim |
| operations on the community | to enhance the lives of consumers and minimise our impact on the environment. These matters are therefore |
| and the environment | considered in all strategic decisions and embedded into the business model. |
| the desirability of the | Our values mirror our culture, and as a team, we aim to be trusted and respected. These values are embedded in the |
| company maintaining a | decisions made by the Board. Staff receive regular training on our anti-corruption policies to ensure that they are |
| reputation for high standards | entrenched in all staff decisions and conduct. Once again, the size and proximity of the workforce allows our values |
| of business conduct | to be communicated, embedded and monitored easily and less formally. |
| the need to act fairly as | The Board recognises the importance of treating all members fairly and monitors the views of the Company's |
| between members of | shareholders through reports on investor and analyst communications, ensuring their views and opinions can be |
| the company | considered when setting strategy. |
Company Information
The success of our Company comes from the people within our team. During a period of transformation and growth it has been critical to engage, listen to and empower our existing team as well as welcome and integrate our new colleagues to position our newly enlarged business for continued growth.
Our people are what make the success of NewRiver possible and we continue to invest in our team, systems, culture and working environment. We are proud of the excellent culture we have fostered, supported by a passionate team of people with considerable experience and expertise in real estate and finance. We are committed to developing talent from within the business and continuously invest to ensure that we have the most talented, agile and fulfilled team we possibly can. The result is a high retention of a committed and expert team who drive our performance and manage our relationships and partnerships.
We have a collegiate and well-balanced team, with a 50:50 gender split. Our team continue to focus on helping drive the business forward whilst also advancing their own career development. We foster strong working relationships with our wider stakeholders who collectively help us deliver on our strategy, business model and ongoing success. We recognise that our stakeholders have a range of priorities and concerns, and we endeavour to incorporate these into our strategic decision-making.
Communication, collaboration and respect continue to sit at the heart of our people strategy which harnesses the power of the team to drive our business forward.

Company Information
Stakeholder engagement continued

59%
of team have worked at NewRiver for +5 years
Low absentee rate of 0%
23% ethnic diversity
50:50
Company Male:Female ratio
Board Male:Female ratio
2,500 total hours of training this year
46 hours of training per
employee this year
of our team undertook professional training during the year
hours of volunteer support dedicated to Trussell
• Well balanced gender and ethnicity representation with a 50:50 male:female split and 23% ethnic representation
Company Information
• We have mental health ambassadors within the NewRiver team and an ongoing partnership with mental health charity, Chasing The Stigma.
Our comprehensive ESG Strategic Report provides a detailed review of our ongoing commitment and progress to this important stakeholder group.
Our shareholders, both institutional and retail, are the ultimate owners of our business. In order to deliver on all our ambitions for the communities we are invested in and grow the business, develop our team and deliver sector leading returns, it is essential that our shareholders understand and support the Company's strategy, business model, investment case and progress.
We have an active engagement strategy, supported by our three corporate brokers (Panmure Liberum, Jefferies and Shore Capital) to provide our shareholders with regular business updates, frequent meetings, both in person and online, and on-site asset tours. Where appropriate, our Board and members of the Executive Committee engaged with shareholders.
This year has been a transformational year for NewRiver following the acquisition of Capital & Regional for £151 million, funded through a combination of cash and shares. The cash proportion of the transaction was part funded through a significantly oversubscribed equity placing and retail offer, reflecting investor confidence in NewRiver and our compelling investment case, together with the attraction of the Capital & Regional transaction and our improving market place. The equity placing enabled us to enhance our equity market profile creating an expanded and strengthened shareholder register and greater trading liquidity of our shares.
Alongside the Capital & Regional acquisition, our regular programme of investor engagement continued including the AGM, regulatory announcements and non-regulatory news flow, conference calls and shareholder roadshows. With appropriate safeguards in place,
we engaged with financial analysts, as well as with financial media, investors, private client fund managers, retail investors and equity sales teams. Regular and targeted engagement ensures that our strategy, business model and investment case are well understood by shareholders and the wider market.

The acquisition of Capital & Regional plc included an equity raise requiring careful and regulated shareholder engagement.
The £151 million acquisition was completed through a combination of cash, part funded by an oversubscribed retail equity placing and retail offer, and shares.
The successful acquisition resulted in an enhanced equity profile with a larger and broader shareholder register which positions our business well for continued growth.
Stakeholder engagement continued
Capital Partnerships are an important part of our strategy and future growth, with the objective of delivering increased earnings in a capital light way through co-investment, asset management fees, a share of rent and the potential to receive financial promotes.

"Today our Capital Partnership business has genuine scale"
Today our Capital Partnership business has genuine scale, with assets under management of £1.5 billion across a portfolio of 21 shopping centres and 18 retail parks, with 14 different partners. Our partner mandates include private equity, banks, institutions and local authorities. Investment partners are increasingly recognising the importance of track record and specialism in this highly operational asset class.
We were pleased to grow our Capital Partnerships business through the acquisition of Ellandi in July 2024 for £5 million. The acquisition is aligned with NewRiver's strategy to expand our Capital Partnership business over the medium term, leveraging our position as one of the largest specialist retail real estate asset managers in the UK. At the time of acquisition, the Ellandi business brought with it a portfolio of 16 shopping centre asset management mandates, covering over 6.3 million sq ft, with 10 different partners.
In FY25 our asset management fees increased by £0.4 million, or 16%, to £2.9 million, principally due to the acquisition of Ellandi. We have now unlocked the operational cost synergies identified within Ellandi, and having made a modest contribution to UFFO in the second half of FY25, we expect that the business will make an increased contribution in FY26 and beyond. The compound annual growth rate in our Capital Partnership revenues over the last five years has been 19% and we expect to continue growing this over the next five years.

Glossary & Company Information
"We are delighted that our asset management strategy is delivering at Midsummer Place. The enhanced occupier mix and physical upgrades align with our vision of establishing a leading retail and leisure destination. The transformation of a derelict area into a thriving F&B and event space has been particularly successful. We are proud of what the team has delivered to date to transform Midsummer Place, and we have a few more exciting things to come next year; I'd like to thank the whole team for their part in this successful turnaround."
Simon Anderson, Asset Management Director
& Appendix
Our assets are located in the heart of communities throughout the UK and play an integral role in the lives of our local customers.
In many of our asset locations we are one of the largest real estate owners and we take this responsibility very seriously. Our asset team and Board Directors visit assets regularly to see the assets in action day to day and understand how our assets provide for the local community and wider town. We aim to strengthen the communities we operate in providing for the everyday needs of locals through our shops and services and supporting the causes that matter to them.

Since the inception of our partnership with Trussell in June 2019, we have raised almost £600,000 in support of their mission to stop UK hunger.
This year, non-monetary support included 2.13 tonnes of food donations; digital advertising; over 105 volunteering hours; and support for their Essentials Guarantee campaign.
Almost

NewRiver REIT plc | Annual Report and Accounts 2025 Governance Report Financial Statements ESG Data Sets 65 Strategic Report
& Appendix
Glossary & Company Information
Stakeholder engagement continued
When our occupiers succeed, we succeed too.
We continuously nurture our working relationships with our occupiers, so we can better understand their needs and potential challenges or opportunities. We have handpicked our portfolio to focus on occupiers that provide essential goods and services, supporting the development of vibrant communities across the UK. Following our acquisition of Ellandi and the expansion of our Capital Partnerships portfolio, we have also developed expertise in managing destination and leisure assets.
We are proud that our portfolio offers excellent affordability of rents with low occupational costs, demonstrated through our consistently strong retailer retention rate and an affordable average rent. Our on-site teams work hard to ensure that our assets are clean, safe and welcoming environments for all ages.
store, where customers are coming from, frequency of visits, average transaction values, a demographic profile of customers and which consecutive stores customers purchases from. The application and analysis of this data touches almost every asset management decision that we make and we believe will significantly enhance our capabilities to make better future decisions to further enhance our asset business plans
Sainsbury's team in the Broadway Shopping Centre, Bexleyheath
Our lenders play a critical role in supporting our operations and growth aspirations, and we are proactive in maintaining strong working relationships with our bank lenders, bondholders and rating agency who in turn help provide funding to facilitate our strategy.
In September 2024 Fitch Ratings affirmed our Long-Term Issuer Default Rating (IDR) at 'BBB' with a Stable Outlook, senior unsecured rating at 'BBB+' and Short-Term IDR at 'F2'. The senior unsecured rating applies to NewRiver's £300 million unsecured bond dated 2028.
"Following the announcement of the transformational acquisition of Capital & Regional, we were delighted to have our investment grade credit ratings affirmed by Fitch once again, endorsing NewRiver's newly expanded business and our differentiated position in the UK retail market.
Our focus on retail assets that provide essential goods and services to consumers on rental terms affordable to retailers, together with our marketleading operating platform, data-led decision making and the strength of our balance sheet means we feel well positioned to continue our growth trajectory."
Will Hobman Chief Financial Officer
& Appendix Glossary & Company Information
Following the expansion of our business, including the acquisition of Ellandi in July 2024 – which added 16 new mandates – and the acquisition of Capital & Regional's six shopping centres, we now work with a broad range of local authorities across the UK, at town, district and county level.
Our efforts focus on regenerating and protecting the towns in which we invest and operate in, creating long-term social and economic growth.
True public/private partnerships at its best – contributing toward the regeneration of Blackpool town centre, underpinned by data-driven decision-making, tailored to meet the needs of residents and visitors alike, to achieve genuine social and economic impact.
work in Blackpool
The quantifiable transformation of Blackpool town centre is a fantastic example of public/ private collaboration. The team drew upon best practice from private sector projects in one of the UK's most deprived towns.
The collaboration has delivered (and continues to deliver) new F&B, a cinema, a market, enhanced retail, as well as improvements to the public realm.
This social value focused partnership with Blackpool Council leveraged the transformation of the retail to help drive the wider regeneration of Blackpool town centre. The research-centric asset management ethos aligns with Blackpool Council's innovative approach which ensures that every step is grounded in evidence, and tailored to meet the evolving needs of its residents and visitors alike.

Strategic Report

Progress towards our objectives is measured annually against our ESG targets and external benchmarks, and the outcomes are used to enhance our ESG activities for the following year. This approach generates a feedback loop whereby our ESG programme adapts to the findings and the evolution of best practice.
transformational year for our business, with our acquisitions of Ellandi and Capital & Regional expanding our platform and potential to make a positive impact in more communities through the pursuit of our ESG objectives. Aligned with our corporate strategy, our objectives are built around four focus areas which reflect the issues that are important to our stakeholders and our business: minimising our environmental impact; engaging our team and occupiers; supporting our communities; and leading in governance and disclosure.
Minimising our environmental impact requires action at the corporate, portfolio, and asset level. We have policies in place to guide corporate-level activity which engage our staff on principles of collective environmental responsibility that can be applied across our business. Our net-zero pathway and interim targets guide our initiatives, supported by our asset-level Environmental & Social Implementation Plans, which allow us to monitor our progress and accelerate action where required.
We are committed to ensuring that we are responsible partners in our communities, supporting and championing local causes and providing an affordable choice of goods and services to address the needs of local people, whilst minimising our impact on the environment.
3. Engaging our Team and Occupiers We are committed to engaging with
and listening to our team, occupiers and communities, working together to bring about positive progress for each and addressing the issues that are important to them.
Being a leader in governance and disclosure means surpassing industry minimum standards and demonstrating our commitment to providing transparent, informative and accurate accounts of our ESG performance and risk management processes. We use various disclosure frameworks to ensure we align our reports with the best available guidance on the ESG issues that our stakeholders value.
ESG report continued
In our FY24 report, we shared our ambition to re-model and re-baseline our Net-Zero targets using the SBTi's Buildings Criteria. Whilst we modelled new targets in FY25 (using FY24 data), our acquisition of Capital & Regional represents a material change to our business, portfolio and emissions profile. As a result, we are now reconsidering the most suitable baseline year from which to measure meaningful progress. As part of this process of evolving our strategy to the latest industry best practice, we will also transition back to financial year emissions reporting to align our ESG and financial disclosures as required by IFRS S1&S2, which we will begin reporting to in FY26.
With the addition of six new shopping centres and three Snozones to our portfolio, we are enthusiastic about the increased scale of the opportunity we have to make a difference in the communities in which we operate. We are grateful to our devoted centre teams and property managers for their commitment to delivering our vision for sustainable growth and thank them wholeheartedly for their continued support. We warmly welcome our new colleagues and embrace working together to generate tangible social impact in our communities.
Yours sincerely,
Head of Asset Management and ESG
16 June 2025
Strategic Report
We use industry-recognised indices to track our sustainability performance:
| Accreditation or commitment score or equivalent |
Observations | |
|---|---|---|
| Global Real Estate Sustainability Benchmark Score: 80/100 |
We have improved our score from 72/100 to 80/100, earning ourselves an additional "green star" signifying improved performance relative to other GRESB participants, and once again achieved a perfect score in the Management module (30/30). We also retained full marks in the Social (18/18) and Governance (20/20) aspects of the assessment. This means our score increase was driven by achieving our goal of enhancing our performance in the Environmental aspect of the assessment, which was a result of improved occupier data collection rates and gaining green building certifications across 10 of our core assets. |
|
| CDP (formerly Carbon Disclosure Project) Score: B |
We are pleased to have maintained our 'B' score in FY25, continuing to be recognised by the CDP for "taking coordinated action on climate issues". Although our overall rating remained the same, we achieved an 'A' rating for Emissions Reduction Initiatives and Low Carbon Products, which was a key improvement opportunity identified in our FY24 ESG report. |
|
| United Nations | The SDGs to which we are committed are: | |
| Sustainable Development Goals We are committed to 11 SDGs addressing issues we can meaningfully impact |
||
| Various case studies are provided throughout this report, demonstrating actions we have taken this year to deliver on these goals. |
||
| Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures 7th consecutive year reporting |
NewRiver publicly supports the TCFD Recommendations and is in its 7th consecutive year of reporting in alignment with them. Following our acquisition of Capital & Regional, we commissioned a new climate scenario analysis of our larger portfolio to provide an up-to-date assessment of the climate-related risks most relevant to our business. This will be the last reporting year that we leverage the TCFD framework, with this taskforce having been disbanded. From FY26, we will report to IFRS S1&S2. |
|
| European Real Estate Association (EPRA) sBPR |
Sustainability Best Practices Recommendations (sBPR) Awards are given to listed real estate companies in recognition of excellence in the transparency and comparability of their ESG disclosures and we are proud to have maintained the |
|
| Award: Gold | top award status. | |
| EPCs | The EPC profile of our portfolio continues to improve with re-assessment upon expiry of previous certificates, with 72% of registered ratings already consistent with the previously proposed 2027 MEES milestone in England & Wales. |
|
| 72% rated 'C' and above | This figure is for the full, post-Capital & Regional acquisition NewRiver operational control portfolio. | |
| WELL Health-Safety Rating |
The rating is designed to empower workplace leaders, owners and operators across large and small businesses alike to prioritise the health and safety of their employees, staff, visitors and other stakeholders. The WELL Health-Safety seal |
|
| 10 assets certified | is a visible mark of our organisation's commitment to ensuring health and safety best practice at our centres. | |
| Real Estate Social Value Index (RESVI) 3 assets certified |
We undertook RESVI assessments on two of our shopping centres and one of our retail parks, to understand and seek to quantify the positive impact our assets have on their local communities. Across the sample, we found that £6.25 per sqft was generated on average, suggesting over £41 million could have been generated across our entire portfolio (pre-Capital & Regional acquisition). |
Each year, our ESG reporting continues to evolve as our ESG programme matures. We stay abreast of emerging market and ESG disclosure trends and proactively manage our data collection processes to ensure our stakeholders are provided with valuable insight into our ESG performance. It is important to NewRiver that key ESG information on our business is accessible, and so whilst we adopt an integrated annual reporting approach, we also make the ESG content of this report and our TCFD disclosures available in standalone documents on our website to provide greater accessibility.
In order to facilitate the ISO 14064-3:2019 verification1 of our environmental data, we altered our ESG reporting period to the calendar year in FY23. We previously reported in direct alignment with our financial reporting year, however the resource requirements of the ISO 14064-3:2019 standard necessitated that we make this change in order to continue with our integrated reporting approach.
This report therefore relates to our ESG performance during the calendar year of 1 January 2024 – 31 December 2024 which includes Q4 FY24 and Q1, Q2 and Q3 in FY25. Throughout this report, this reporting period is referred to as FY25. The preceding calendar year is utilised for year-on-year performance comparisons, and is referred to throughout as FY24.
In disclosing our ESG performance, we adopt the Operational Control boundary, in recognition of this boundary being reflective of our ability to implement our operating policies and influence ESG performance. Our Operational Control boundary excludes JV assets in which we have a minority ownership stake, and assets where we act only in an advisory capacity.
On 10 December 2024, NewRiver acquired Capital & Regional, representing a significant change to our business. The acquisition added six new shopping centres to our portfolio, as well as Snozone – the UK's largest indoor real snow centres - creating a material shift in our emissions profile.
As our ESG reporting period is calendar year, as was Capital & Regional's, and the acquisition completed with only three weeks of the reporting period remaining, we have maintained separate full calendar year environmental disclosures for NewRiver and Capital & Regional, which are presented alongside one another in this report. We made this decision to ensure that year-on-year performance comparisons remain useful and directly comparable. However, in order to provide environmental insights which align with and fully reflect our financial performance, we have also provided an additional SECR disclosure for the FY25 period of 1 April 2024 – 31 March 2025. This disclosure is an estimate based on an extrapolation of the 2024 calendar year data for both businesses. It therefore represents 36
weeks of emissions data for NewRiver only, combined with 16 weeks of NewRiver and Capital & Regional emissions data, to represent a 12 month period in which the acquisition took place during week 37, consistent with our financial reporting. This is provided to ensure that meaningful insights can be generated as to the relationship between our financial and environmental performance.
Please note that all commentary in relation to performance against our ESG targets relates to the pre-acquisition NewRiver portfolio only, as we did not have sufficient time remaining in the reporting year to re-baseline any targets and/or incorporate new assets into the processes that enable us to make progress against these targets2. We look forward to establishing new targets that reflect the opportunities presented by our larger portfolio.
Our disclosures are structured to provide stakeholders with an overview of our ESG programme, our approach to realising our ESG objectives, and details of our activities within – and performance against – these objectives.
To maintain transparency and comparability of our performance disclosures over time, we consistently monitor and report against the sustainability metrics recommended by EPRA. As such, performance insights are provided on both a "like-for-like" and "absolute" basis. Like-for-like disclosures remove properties that were acquired or sold during the reporting year from the comparison, to evidence how our portfolio performed without increases or decreases in energy/water consumption and waste generation associated with owning more or fewer properties than in the previous year. Absolute disclosures disregard the impact of property sales and acquisitions, providing a complete picture of our overall impact as a business. We believe both metrics are important for transparently communicating our environmental impact and how we are progressing against our target to minimise it.
We assess the materiality of ESG issues relevant to our business by considering their potential impact on our portfolio, our stakeholders, and our communities. The UN Sustainable Development Goals to which we have committed support guided action on issues that we have the opportunity to meaningfully contribute to, by nature of our business model, purpose, and mission. Embedding the recommendations of the Task Force on Climate-Related Financial Disclosures allows us to identify risks and opportunities associated with external factors, and develop an informed and strategic approach to their management.
Our ESG reporting is guided by relevant global reporting frameworks including the EPRA Sustainability Best Practices Recommendations (sBPR), and the Recommendations of the Task Force for Climate-related Financial Disclosures (TCFD). Having integrated our ESG reporting into our Annual Report & Accounts, we also adopt the recommendations of the International Integrated Reporting Council (IIRC).
Following the disbandment of the TCFD and in anticipation of legislation to mandate listed companies to report sustainability and climate-related risks and opportunities in accordance with the International Sustainability Standards Board's (ISSB) Sustainability Disclosure Standards (SDS: IFRS S1&S2) as part of the UK Sustainability Reporting Standards (UK SRS), we are transitioning our ESG reporting year back to full alignment with our financial year. This poses some practical challenges for our GHG data verification processes, however we are trialling quarterly verification with our consultants to address this challenge. We therefore anticipate that our FY26 disclosure will relate to the period of 1 Apr 2025 – 31 Mar 2026, and that our sustainability and climate-related risk disclosures will be provided in accordance with IFRS S1&S2. As such, this will be the last report in which these disclosures are referred to as "TCFD Disclosures".
We assess the long-term resilience of our assets, with capital allocation decisions made by comparing risk adjusted returns on our assets to those available from other uses of capital. Capital allocation options include investing into our portfolio, acquiring assets in the direct real estate market and share buybacks. Assets can be acquired either on our balance sheet or in capital partnerships.
1 3 2
with a committed ESG strategy embedded across our business
Balance Sheet
Our operating platform is underpinned by a conservative, predominantly unsecured balance sheet. We are focused on maintaining our prudent covenant headroom position and have access to significant cash reserves which provide us with the flexibility to pursue opportunities which support our strategy for growth.
We leverage our market leading platform to enhance and protect income returns through active asset management across our assets and for assets we manage on behalf of our capital partnerships; the latter provides enhanced returns through asset management fee income and the opportunity to receive promote fees.
Our business model is underpinned by a high-quality portfolio, expert team, strong working relationships, data-driven insight, robust systems and a commitment to sustainability to support the delivery of positive performance for the long-term
Our net-zero strategy is embedded in every stage of our asset management approach and collaboration with our Capital Partners. We seek to provide future-proofed developments which minimise lifecycle carbon.
Our assets play a critical role in communities and our on-site teams support local charities and community groups. We work closely with councils and local stakeholders to ensure developments address community needs.
We raise awareness of evolving ESG issues and create opportunities for positive impact. We engage our existing occupiers in our sustainability strategy and work with new occupiers to deliver on mutual sustainability goals.
and Disclosure
We recognise our responsibility to ensure long-term resilience against societal, regulatory and climate change. We adopt industry-leading frameworks, performance benchmarks and certifications to align our governance and disclosure processes with best practice.
1 2 3
ESG report continued
& Appendix
N Publicly commit to net-zero and set FY20 carbon emissions baseline
All enclosed shopping centres to participate in our Quiet Hour initiative and have a community engagement in place. 50% of NewRiver staff to participate in our volunteering programme
N Achieve net-zero for all corporate-related carbon emissions (Scope 1-3)
85% recycling rate at our managed properties
E Electric vehicle charging points installed across all retail properties with a surface level car park
50% improvement (from 2020 baseline) in landlord on-site renewable energy generation
Building certifications targeted, and lifecycle carbon assessments undertaken, for
100% of our new construction and major renovation projects
S Achieve a 75% response rate to our occupier satisfaction survey. Biodiversity plans to be in place for at least 15% of our assets
N Achieve net-zero for all operational emissions from the directly managed areas of our portfolio (Scope 1-3)
| Target | year | % complete | FY25 Progress Report |
|---|---|---|---|
| Environmental | |||
| 100% of waste generated at our managed properties is diverted from landfill |
2022 | 100% | We are pleased to have achieved our target of zero waste to landfill in FY22 and maintained this policy throughout FY25. |
| 100% of landlord electricity is procured from renewable sources |
2022 | 100% | We transitioned all landlord electricity supplies across our portfolio to Renewable Energy Guarantees of Origin (REGO) backed tariffs in 2020. |
| 85% recycling rate at our managed properties | 2025 | 57% | Considering only non-organic waste, our FY25 recycling rate was 48%. Please see page 80 for a detailed explanation and our plans to address this going forward. |
| Electric vehicle charging points installed across all retail properties with a surface-level car park |
2025 | 80% | We currently have EV charging installations or contracts in motion to deliver installations at 12/15 of our surface-level car parks, bringing our progress rate to 80%. We previously reported a progress rate of 88%, however this has shifted due to feasibility challenges at two of our sites. Where feasibility challenges are commercial rather than technical, we will continue to explore alternative delivery routes. In addition to this target however, we also have EV chargers available at 60% of our multi-storey car parks. Together, this means that EV charging infrastructure is, or will shortly be, available at 72% of our sites. |
| 50% improvement (from a 2020 baseline) in landlord on-site renewable energy generation |
2025 | 0% | Whilst renewable energy generation at our sites increased 7% between 2023 and 2024, primarily due to maintenance works to our solar installations, overall renewable energy generation has decreased 32% between 2020 and 2024 (though two sites have seen increases of 30-32%). This is because existing installations are aging, and because we have not commissioned any new installations during the last few years. We have plans to replace inverters at our site in Hastings to boost generation there, and are exploring a large additional installation at one of our newly acquired sites, the Exchange in Ilford. We recognise that this target has not been achieved and that this year's significant growth of our portfolio requires it to be revisited. |
| Building certifications targeted, and lifecycle carbon assessments undertaken, for 100% of our new construction and major renovation projects |
2025 | N/A | There were no relevant projects in relation to this target during the 12-month period to 31 December 2024. |
Company Information
ESG report continued
| Target | year | % complete | FY24 Progress Report |
|---|---|---|---|
| Social | |||
| Support a minimum of 5 industry/ career engagement activities for young people per year |
Annual | 100% | • (1-3) Our Broadway Centre in Bexleyheath hosted three site visits in partnership with the Palace for Life Foundation (find out more on page 86) and Townley Grammar School, between February and December 2024. • (4) We supported an interview workshop with students of Gaynes School, Upminster, in June 2024. • (5-6) We supported two Palace for Life Foundation Career Fairs in March and April 2024. • (7) We supported a Harris Academy, Greenwich Career Fair in July 2024. • (8) We supported a year 12 interview workshop with Southfields Academy in November 2024. • (9) Through our relationship with the Academy of Real Assets, we continue to have representation on their youth board which meets regularly throughout the year. |
| Achieve a 90% response rate to our annual staff survey, with at least 80% confirming that they feel NewRiver cares about their wellbeing |
Annual | 100% | We received a 96% response rate to our most recent staff survey (March 24), with 88% of respondents confirming that they feel NewRiver cares about their wellbeing (up from 85% in the previous year). The survey is conducted as part of the Times Best Places to Work initiative, so is fully independent. We were rated "excellent" in all aspects assessed. |
| All enclosed shopping centres to participate in our Quiet Hour Initiative and have a community engagement plan in place |
Ongoing | 100% | The introduction of asset-level Environmental & Social Implementation Plans across our portfolio means that all centres have an action plan in place for ongoing community engagement activities, with the Quiet Hour initiative forming a key component of these plans. |
| 50% of NewRiver staff to participate in our volunteering programme |
Annual | 100% | In FY25, NewRiver staff provided 90 hours of volunteer support to Trussell, with volunteering sessions typically lasting around five hours each. Staff also provided a further 206 hours of volunteering time to their own chosen causes, including homelessness and health charities. This equates to a total of 59 volunteering sessions for 62 staff members (average headcount for the year), meaning we have more than fulfilled our target. |
| Achieve a 75% response rate to our occupier satisfaction survey |
2025 | 100% | We are pleased to have achieved this target with our most recent Occupier Satisfaction & Sustainability survey (FY24), which achieved a response rate of 78%. Our centre teams played a pivotal role in the achievement of this target, aided by our introduction of a £10 charity donation incentive for each response given. |
| Biodiversity plans to be in place for at least 15% of our assets |
2025 | 100% | This year, we commissioned a portfolio-wide biodiversity risk assessment to be undertaken, to evaluate the biodiversity-related impacts and dependencies relevant to our assets. The assessment looked at a variety of metrics such as water condition and scarcity, air condition, tree cover loss, pollution, invasives and ecosystem condition. The results of the assessment are now being leveraged to incorporate measures into our Environmental & Social Implementation plans, tailored to the specific biodiversity risks relevant to each centre's location. |
On Earth Day, 22nd April 2022, we became a signatory to the Better Buildings Partnership's Climate Commitment, joining other responsible organisations across the industry in pursuing a 1.5°C future for our planet. In becoming a signatory, we have committed to publishing our net-zero carbon pathway and delivery plan, disclosing the energy performance of our assets, and developing a comprehensive climate resilience strategy. The initiative has an overreaching objective of delivering net-zero buildings by 2050, incorporating both operational and embodied carbon. The scope of the commitment makes it one of the most ambitious commitments that property owners can adopt.
The key milestones on our journey to becoming a net-zero business are:
As of FY25, we have achieved a 39% reduction in total Scope 1 & 2 emissions from our baseline year of FY20, bringing us 93% of the way to our SBTi-approved 2030 target to reduce absolute emissions by 42%.
Considering our corporate emissions only, and our target to bring these to net-zero by 2025, we have achieved a 47% reduction in location-based Scope 1 & 2 emissions, and fully eliminated our market-based Scope 1 & 2 emissions. Whilst our expanded dataset and improved accounting methodologies between our baseline year and now have seen our calculated corporate Scope 3 emissions increase, we have offset our residual emissions of 560 tCO2e via a validated Woodland Carbon Code project at Loch Ness, to bring them to a net-zero level.
In-line with the Companies Act 2006 (Strategic & Directors' Reports) Regulations 2013, we disclose our annual global GHG emissions in terms of our total energy use, intensity ratio, and a narrative on the energy management and efficiency measures we implement. Tables presenting a breakdown of this information for the NewRiver business (Jan-Dec 2024), Capital & Regional business (Jan-Dec 2024), and combined business (Apr 2024 – Mar 2025) can be found on the following two pages.
Environmental & Social Implementation Plans are in place across NewRiver's managed shopping centres. The plans specify four mandatory energy management and efficiency measures which must be reviewed, on a quarterly basis, for implementation at all centres where relevant and feasible. These measures are: routine reviews of the installation of smart meters (AMR) for all relevant utility types; installation of LEDs in all landlordcontrolled areas; implementing a Building Management System optimisation programme; and reviewing plant equipment run times and controls at least quarterly and ensuring optimum settings are in place for day/night, seasons and occupancy levels.
A key driver of our reduced common area electricity consumption this year has been the implementation of the above initiatives, such as at our Hillstreet Centre in Middlesbrough which is now 100% LED throughout landlordcontrolled areas and adopts a phased lighting programme in the lead up to all store opening times. A key saving was the installation of motion sensor lights within the customer staircase to the malls. The number of old fluorescent tube lights was reduced from 28 lights at 158w each, to 7 LEDs. Similarly, at Three Horseshoes Walk in Warminster, lighting replacements and adjustments to lighting schedules contributed to a 44% saving in FY25. We have also invested in LED lighting replacement projects at our Horsefair Shopping Centre in Wisbech, Hildreds Shopping Centre in Skegness, and Cuckoo Bridge Retail Park in Dumfries. These are landlord-funded projects which will serve to generate energy and cost savings for our service charges.
| NewRiver REIT plc Annual Report and Accounts 2025 | |
|---|---|
NewRiver REIT plc | Annual Report and Accounts 2025 Governance Report Financial Statements ESG Data Sets 76 & Appendix Glossary & Company Information Strategic Report
ESG report continued
Tables below present total energy use (including electricity on both a location and market basis), carbon footprint across Scope 1, 2 and 3 emissions, as well as an appropriate carbon intensity metric. The performance data presented below relates to the 2024 calendar year, 1st January 2024 – 31st December 2024, but consistent with the rest of this report, is referred to as FY25. For the avoidance of doubt, FY24 figures relate to the calendar year of 2023.
| FY25 SECR Disclosure (NewRiver Jan-Dec 2024) | % Change | FY25 SECR Disclosure (Capital & Regional Jan-Dec 2024) | FY24 | FY25 | % Change | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FY24 | FY25 | % Change | Greenhouse Gas Emissions by Scope (tCO2e) | ||||
| Greenhouse Gas Emissions by Scope (tCO2e) | Scope 1 Emissions from combustion of gas & other fuels | 410 | 408 | 0% | |||
| Scope 2 Location-based emissions from electricity | |||||||
| Scope 1 Emissions from combustion of gas & other fuels | 495 | 431 | -13% | purchased for own use | 3,686 | 3,253 | -12% |
| Scope 2 Location-based emissions from electricity | Scope 2 Market-based emissions from electricity purchased | ||||||
| purchased for own use | 1,702 | 1,501 | -12% | for own use | 8 | 1 | -90% |
| Scope 2 Market-based emissions from electricity purchased | Scope 3 Emissions from fuel & energy-related activities, | ||||||
| for own use | – | – | – | waste (including water), and downstream leased assets | 6,499 | 8,326 | 28% |
| Scope 3 Emissions from purchased goods & services, capital | |||||||
| goods, fuel & energy-related activities, waste (including | |||||||
| water), business travel & employee commuting, and downstream leased assets |
22,060 | 13,170 | -40% | Total Scope 1, 2 & 3 location-based emissions | 10,595 | 11,988 | 13% |
| Total Scope 1, 2 & 3 location-based emissions | 24,256 | 15,102 | -38% | UK only Scope 1, 2 & 3 location-based emissions | 9,428 | 10,854 | 15% |
| Total Scope 1, 2 & 3 market-based emissions | 22,178 | 13,269 | -40% | Total Scope 1, 2 & 3 market-based emissions | 6,917 | 8,735 | 26% |
| Intensity Scope 1 & 2 (location-based) tCO2e/m2 | 0.013 | 0.014 | 3% | UK only Scope 1, 2 & 3 market-based emissions | 6,625 | 8,451 | 28% |
| Energy Consumption (kWh) | Total Intensity Scope 1 & 2 (location-based) tCO2e/m2 | 0.013 | 0.014 | 9% | |||
| Energy use from the combustion of gas and other fuels | 2,708,120 | 2,355,619 | -13% | UK only intensity Scope 1 &2 (location-based) tCO2e/m2 | 0.010 | 0.011 | 7% |
| Energy use from consumption of electricity purchased for | |||||||
| own use | 8,217,064 | 7,247,261 | -12% | Energy Consumption (kWh) | |||
| Energy use from business travel | 31,963 | 22,874 | -28% | Total energy use from the combustion of gas and other fuels | 2,240,988 | 2,232,847 | 0% |
| UK only energy use from the combustion of gas and other fuels | 2,240,988 | 2,232,847 | 0% | ||||
| Total energy use from consumption of electricity purchased | |||||||
| for own use | 17,799,048 | 15,713,094 | -12% | ||||
| UK only energy use from the consumption of electricity | |||||||
| purchased for own use | 13,571,733 | 11,609,569 | -14% |
In order to provide environmental insights which align with and fully reflect our financial performance, we have provided an additional SECR disclosure for the FY25 period of 1 April 2024 – 31 March 2025. This disclosure is an estimate based on an extrapolation of the 2024 calendar year data for both businesses presented above. It therefore represents 36 weeks of emissions data for NewRiver only, combined with 16 weeks of NewRiver and Capital & Regional emissions data, to represent a 12 month period in which NewRiver's acquisition of Capital & Regional took place during week 37, consistent with our financial reporting. The comparison data is drawn from NewRiver's FY24 SECR disclosure (calendar year 2023) data. This is provided to ensure that meaningful insights can be generated as to the relationship between our financial and environmental performance. The data below has not been seasonally-adjusted and therefore represents an equal division and multiplication of relevant weeks from the calendar year period by number only, i.e. the 16 weeks of combined data does not represent 16 weeks from the winter quarter, but 16 average weeks.
| 1 April 2024 – 31 March 2025 | FY24 | FY25 | % Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Greenhouse Gas Emissions by Scope (tCO2e) | |||
| Scope 1 emissions from combustion of gas & other fuels | 495 | 557 | 12% |
| UK only Scope 1 emissions from combustion of gas & other fuels | 495 | 557 | 12% |
| Scope 2 location-based emissions from electricity purchased for own use |
1,702 | 2,502 | 47% |
| UK only Scope 2 location-based emissions from electricity purchased for own use |
1,702 | 2,240 | 32% |
| Scope 2 market-based emissions from electricity purchased for own use |
0 | 0 | – |
| UK only Scope 2 market-based emissions from electricity purchased for own use |
0 | 0 | – |
| Scope 3 Emissions from & energy-related activities, waste (including water) and downstream leased assets |
21,035 | 15,174 | -28% |
| UK only Scope 3 Emissions from & energy-related activities, waste (including water) and downstream leased assets |
21,035 | 15,087 | -28% |
| Total Scope 1, 2 & 3 location-based emissions | 23,232 | 18,233 | -22% |
| UK only total Scope 1, 2 & 3 location-based emissions | 23,232 | 17,884 | -23% |
| Total Scope 1, 2 & 3 market-based emissions | 21,531 | 15,731 | -27% |
| UK only total Scope 1, 2 & 3 market-based emissions | 21,531 | 15,644 | -27% |
| Intensity Scope 1 & 2 (location-based) tCO2e/m2 | 0.013 | 0.013 | -2% |
| UK only intensity Scope 1 & 2 (location-based) tCO2e/m2 Energy Consumption (kWh) |
0.013 | 0.012 | -10% |
| Energy use from the combustion of gas and other fuels | 2,708,120 | 3,042,649 | 12% |
| UK only energy use from the combustion of gas and other fuels | 2,708,120 | 3,042,649 | 12% |
| Energy use from consumption of electricity purchased for own use | 8,217,604 | 12,082,059 | 47% |
| UK only energy use from consumption of electricity purchased for own use |
8,217,604 | 10,819,436 | 32% |
Reporting Period Our GHG emissions performance disclosures relate to the calendar year of 2024 (referred to as FY25). Emissions data from the calendar year of 2023 (referred to as FY24) has also been included. Boundary We have used the Operational Control method to outline our carbon footprint boundary. Emissions arising from occupiers' energy usage are not included in our Scope 1 and 2 reporting boundaries, but are reported in Scope 3 as downstream leased assets. Our Operational Control boundary excludes assets owned by JV
partnerships, as well as assets where we act only in an advisory capacity.
Strategic Report
| Reporting Method |
We have measured emissions based on the GHG Protocol Corporate Accounting Standard (revised edition) and guidance provided by the UK's Department for Energy Security and Net Zero (DESNZ) and the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (DEFRA) on Streamlined Energy and Carbon Reporting and greenhouse gas reporting. |
|---|---|
| Emissions Factor |
The emissions factors and conversions used for 2024 (FY25) reporting are from the DESNZ/DEFRA greenhouse gas reporting tool 2024 and the factors and conversions used for 2023 (FY24) reporting are from the 2023 reporting tool. |
| Scope 3 Emissions |
For the NewRiver only disclosure, we used the GHG Protocol Scope 3 Standard to collate and report on our Scope 3 emissions in the form of emissions from purchased goods and services, capital goods, fuel and energy-related activities, waste and water, business travel, employee commuting and downstream leased assets. Data relating to all of these categories were unavailable for the Capital & Regional business for the same period, so the Capital & Regional disclosure includes the categories of fuel and energy-related activities, waste and water, and downstream leased assets only. For consistency, the extrapolated disclosure for the combined business includes only those scope 3 emissions categories that are available for both businesses: fuel and energy-related activities, waste and water, and downstream leased assets. |
| Intensity Level |
For intensity level reporting, we have used the directly controlled area of our portfolio as the denominator. Vacant units have been excluded in the intensity measure due to the year-on-year variability. Note for NewRiver disclosure: Whilst this approach does not typically impact performance trends, in that emissions intensities usually increase or decrease in-line with absolute emissions, in the case of the FY25 reporting year, fluctuations in energy consumption arising from the vacant and rates mitigation units across our portfolio have led to an increase in emissions intensity, despite like-for-like common area energy consumption reducing. |
| Changes in Methodology |
As part of our ISO14064-3:2019 data verification process, we receive recommendations from our data verifiers to improve the accuracy of our disclosures on our environmental impact. This year, we received a recommendation to adopt alternative emissions factors in the quantification of our Purchased Goods & Services and Capital Goods emissions. We accepted this recommendation and considered whether its impact was significant enough to necessitate a restatement of the previous year's disclosures adopting the same methodology. This category of emissions represents less than 5% of our overall emissions, and if it were to be removed from the disclosure, scope 3 emissions would still be reported to have reduced by 40%. Hence, we have concluded that this change is immaterial and does not necessitate a restatement of FY24's disclosure. Also acting on the recommendations of our data verifiers, we excluded occupied units on 1,000 year leases from our downstream leased assets emissions calculations. This resulted in only a 3% reduction in like-for-like floor area and so has also been deemed an immaterial change in our accounting methodology. |
& Appendix
Company Information
10,000,000
Portfolio Scope 1&2 GHG Emissions (Absolute) tCO2e

Portfolio Electricity Consumption (Absolute) kWh

XX
XX

Like-for-like electricity consumption increased by 1% in FY25 due to fluctuations arising from vacant and rates mitigation units. In contrast, like-for-like common area consumption showed an alternative pattern, with electricity consumption reducing by 2%.
Lighting replacement projects including the installation of motion sensors, as well as manual adjustments to lighting schedules, achieved more impact at site level than is evident from the overall reduction in common area electricity consumption (2%). Unfortunately, three sites
experienced re-invoicing for previously under-estimated consumption by suppliers, which has diminished the net reduction in electricity consumption.
Overall, our absolute electricity consumption was down by 12%, driven by asset disposals which took place during the year. This was also a key driver of the overall reduction in Scope 3 emissions, alongside improved data collection via our partnership with Arbnco, as downstream leased assets make up the vast majority of this emissions category.
Like-for-like gas consumption reduced by 7%, largely driven by our Broadway shopping centre in Bexleyheath, which experienced a 27% reduction in gas usage, predominantly owing to the IBOS system we installed last year.
Some sites did however experience increases in gas consumption, arising from changes in heating requirements to maintain comfortable temperatures in mall spaces, ageing plant, and re-invoicing.
Plans to reduce gas consumption in the coming year include the replacement of the calorifier at our shopping centre in Hastings. We are also exploring the opportunity to replace the gas fired system in Newton Mearns with an electric alternative, which would represent the full decarbonisation of the centre.
Our remaining gas supplies are procured on a carbon offset tariff, to support with further reducing our environmental impact ahead of our target to bring these emissions to net-zero.
For the avoidance of doubt, these offsets are not reflected in our emissions disclosures.
Portfolio Scope 1&2 GHG Emissions (Absolute) tCO2e

Portfolio Electricity Consumption (Absolute) kWh
XX
XX


& Appendix
Company Information

Absolute electricity consumption decreased by 19% across Capital & Regional's shopping centre portfolio in 2024, as a result of the disposal of two centres during 2023. On a like-for-like basis, electricity consumption reduced by 3%. This reduction was achieved through the following energy efficiency measures:
The shopping centres' like-for-like gas consumption increased by 3% in 2024 is due to a new strategy agreed by the site team and tenants at Maidstone, where instead of gas distribution being controlled manually, the site now operates an automatic system with a set-point of 8°C so that the heating systems run automatically if outside temperatures drop below this. In winter months in Kent, there were lows of 2-7°C, meaning that the automatic set-point system activated more frequently in 2024.
The centre's water consumption decreased by 10% due to the availability of more accurate data in 2024, while waste generation increased by 4% on an absolute basis (3% like-for-like).
Since October 2008, an Energy Performance Certificate (EPC) has been legally required when a building is sold, rented, or constructed. A certificate is valid for a period of 10 years; on expiry there is no legal requirement to replace an EPC unless the property is to be sold or let. In England & Wales, the Minimum Energy Efficiency Standards (MEES) require that all properties, where valid EPCs exist, must have an asset rating of "E" or above to be lawfully let. Previously this requirement only applied to new tenancies, however it was extended to cover existing (non-domestic) tenancies on 1 April 2023.
The below chart shows NewRiver EPCs for the England & Wales retail portfolio (post-Capital & Regional acquisition) in comparison to the national EPC register, comparing against other non-domestic certificates. Our data shows that the NewRiver portfolio out-performs the EPC profile of the national database, having a higher proportion of certificates providing a minimum rating of "C", and no "F" or "G" ratings. Our programme of EPC assessments and Minimum Energy Efficiency Standards (MEES) risk reduction has helped to ensure we can continue to let properties lawfully. Through continued management of non-compliant and expiring EPCs in accordance with the MEES, the NewRiver portfolio is well defended against potential compliance-related risks to value.
Absolute water consumption reduced by 11% in FY25, driven by asset disposals. On a like-for-like basis, common area water consumption increased marginally, by 2%. The increase has arisen from two locations; one where we refurbished the onsite sprinkler storage tanks which required that we empty and refill two tanks amounting to 1 million litres of water usage. The same site also experienced increased occupancy as we welcomed new F&B retailers. The second site that experienced a significant increase in water usage is one where the supplier had been billing to estimated consumption levels as access to the meter requires a hydraulic lift. Access to the meter has since been enabled and so the increase is a result of correcting previously underestimated usage. As these are non-routine events, we have not identified any required remediation actions to address this increase. We continue to consider water reduction opportunities more generally as a standard part of our management approach.
Glossary &
Percentage of properties

* National database figures are correct as of December 2024
For a full breakdown of our portfolio EPC profile including Northern Ireland & Scotland, please see page 212 (Appendix).
Disposal Route

Waste to anaerobic digestion
Waste Type
Food waste

In FY251 , the total volume of waste generated across our portfolio reduced by 4%, however on a like-for-like basis increased by 3% (76 tonnes). Approximately a third of this increase was general waste generation, which is a lower proportion than the waste stream accounts for as a whole (65%). We saw notable increases in glass waste volume (73%), cans & plastics (156%), and wood (108%), which together represent 86% of the increase in waste volume and for which relevant waste segregation opportunities were available to ensure that these streams could be recycled. 8% of the increase was a result of non-routine waste generation of furniture, tube lights and hard plastics associated with a refurbishment, all of which was sent to a dedicated recycling facility.
Despite the improved waste segregation opportunities, our analysis shows a reduction in recycling rates. Although the overall proportion of general waste remained static at 65%, incineration rates are shown to have increased due to improved visibility of how the general waste generated at our centre in Newtownabbey is processed once it reaches the mixed recycling facility. Because this centre is one of our largest and therefore generates a significant proportion of our overall waste, this has had a considerable impact on our performance analysis. Whilst it is disappointing to learn that our recycling rates are not as high as we had previously thought, good quality data is essential to making and measuring progress. This does however mean that we have not achieved our target recycling rate of 85%, with 52% of total waste volume being recycled (including organic waste diverted from general waste).
We will continue to champion and enable retailers and customers to practice effective waste management by providing appropriate facilities, clear signposting, and educational materials as we remain in pursuit of our target 85% recycling rate. To ensure that we make progress over the coming year, we have initiated the following improvements:

Priory Meadow Shopping Centre hosted a variety of free events for kids, running every Saturday throughout July and August, at a giant sand beach at the shopping centre. Families were invited to take place in a Recycling Race – a fun, educational game in which children had one minute to race across the sand and sort the giant foam props into the correct recycling bins! Footfall to the event was 375. Feedback: "it's a great little event for the kids. Brilliant that it's free"; "Really important topic. It's great, keep it up!".


The Hildreds Centre has introduced a "magic bookcase", which makes free books accessible to local children. The aim is for children to choose a book to take home and enjoy, then, once they have read it, either keep it, pass it onto a friend, or return the book and select a new, starting the process again.
Listening is at the core of our approach to engaging our team. We strive to understand and respond to the diverse needs of our team at all levels, enabling us to develop our policies and process to better support needs and goals. We work hard to engender a positive culture which provides the support and flexibility to ensure staff wellbeing. Our retention record and our approval ratings in staff surveys is testament to the effectiveness of this approach.
Monitoring and needs assessment take place both through the employee appraisal process and anonymously via our annual staff survey. Our 2024 staff survey was independently managed and analysed by The Sunday Times, and as a result, we were recognised as one of the "Sunday Times Best Places to Work 2024".
The survey questions are designed to gain insights into staff opinion and identify beneficial actions in respect of NewRiver's policies, procedures and cultural norms in the areas of: reward & recognition, information sharing, empowerment, wellbeing, instilling pride, and job satisfaction. We were rated "excellent" in all six of the survey's focus areas.
We received a 96% response rate to the survey, with over 80% of staff identifying that they:
ESG training is delivered to our team on an annual basis. Training sessions cover a range of topics including industry initiatives and trends, updates on our performance, and support for implementing any newly introduced policies and processes. Annual training sessions extend to our on-site teams, who receive training specific to the nature of their roles.
We continue to include personal ESG targets in employee goal setting and performance appraisals. We encourage employees to include targets which support our corporate objectives, but also provide the flexibility to set personal targets that address issues which are important to them or their role. Achievement of the ESG targets feeds directly into the rewards process with all other employee objectives. Members of senior management have specific ESG performance goals connected to a pre-defined bonus potential.

In January 2025, we welcomed a new ESG Strategy Lead, who is working closely with our Head of Asset Management & ESG, Emma Mackenzie, as we continue to evolve and integrate our ESG strategy across our operations and portfolio. Having dedicated internal resource ensures visibility of our ESG priorities for our wider team, helping to keep them front and centre of our approach to our core business activities.
We have also established a Wellness & Representation Committee, chaired by our Customer Experience and Social Impact Manager, Erin Thorne. The committee is tasked with implementing initiatives that promote social engagement, awareness, and wellbeing amongst our team, incorporating their ideas and feedback. Initiatives include fitness classes, a book club, desk assessments and massages via Workplace Bliss, knowledge sharing sessions and fun activities to celebrate special interest days.

Occupier satisfaction is a core priority of our business; as such, we undertake routine surveys to gain insight into occupier opinions on material topics such as the service-mindedness of our centre management teams and our sustainability programme.
The opportunity to respond to our most recent survey (FY24) was offered to 100% of our occupiers, and we received a response rate of 78% exceeding our 75% target. Key insights from this survey were shared in our FY24 report, and we were delighted with the high levels of overall satisfaction. We also received some helpful, constructive feedback which we took the opportunity to respond to last year, and are pleased to provide an update on the actions we have taken in consideration of this feedback as follows:
| Feedback Item | FY25 Update |
|---|---|
| Over half of retailers would be interested to hear more from us on the overall sustainability performance of their individual centre |
We've partnered with Arbnco to collect energy performance data on our centres via the national database. Through the collection of this data, Arbnco will generate 120 "bite size reports" to provide actionable insights directly to our retailers. We have also generated engagement materials on effective waste management and introduced quarterly recycling rate reporting within the centre common parts. |
| Our retailers advised us that they would welcome additional waste segregation/ recycling opportunities |
New waste streams have been introduced at 7 of our centres so far. Centres have also improved engagement efforts, such as at our Hillstreet shopping centre where waste champions have been appointed to ensure that the waste management infrastructure provided is being used effectively. |
| A top suggestion for environmental/social initiatives to introduce was "more greenery/ plants" |
Live trees have been introduced alongside new seating installations at the Broadway shopping centre, Bexleyheath. We have also commissioned new planting schemes for the Piazza shopping centre, Paisley and Priory Meadow shopping centre, Hastings. We also intend to add new external planting at the Townley Road entrance to the Broadway shopping centre. |
Following the acquisition of Capital & Regional, we updated our review of our occupiers' sustainability commitments and emissions reduction ambitions, to understand the proportion of our new Scope 3 emissions profile captured by commitments consistent with our own.
As of February 2025, 66% of our occupied portfolio floor area is covered by emissions reduction commitments, with a further 5% occupied by retailers whose commitments are in development. Of this 66%, 60% is occupied by retailers who are signatories to the BRC's Climate Action Roadmap.
Focusing on our top 100 retailers (who occupy 51% of our portfolio floor area), 82% of the floor area they occupy is covered by emissions reduction commitments, with a further 4% occupied by retailers who have communicated they are developing their targets. We continue
to be encouraged by the ambition levels of our retailer base and reassured that we are on a collective pathway to achieving net-zero.
We incorporate green clauses into all our standard form leases, which engage our occupiers in key areas of our net-zero strategy, such as the procurement of renewable energy. Of the new leases (of >1 year) we agreed in FY25, 50% included at least one priority green clause.
Having partnered with Arbnco to collect our energy data, we've also received insight into the impact of our occupiers' energy purchasing decisions on our scope 3 emissions. Based on the emissions factors submitted to the national database by the relevant suppliers, our occupiers' purchasing decisions mean that market-based emissions associated with their electricity consumption are 52% lower than location-based (average national grid) emissions. Whilst we do not reflect this in our SECR disclosure due to the limited granularity of the data available to us, it is a positive indication of sustainable procurement decisions being made by our occupiers.


When we acquired Capital & Regional, we became owners of Snozone, the UK's largest indoor real snow centres. The business has a mature ESG programme and shares our ambitions to align our net-zero transition with a 1.5-degree future, with progress so far including:
& Appendix
• Following the success of voltage optimiser installations at our Yorkshire and Madrid venues, we installed a unit at our Milton Keynes venue in April 2024. The optimisers ensure that the plant and machinery is only supplied with the power they need, thus eliminating wastage.
• We improved the insulation of our ski slopes throughout 2024, using 3D scanners to pinpoint areas where heat could escape, and renewing or replacing insulating materials. The UK venues installed 4 sets of new airlock doors to the slopes which further insulates slope-side operations. We also installed a new AHU unit at Milton Keynes which is estimated to achieve a saving of 90,000 kWh per year.
Company Information
• All Snozone venues are fully fitted with LED lighting and in 2024, Madrid undertook a de-lamping project to remove unnecessary lighting. This completed the 2-year project for the group in further reducing consumption. Our UK venues are now rated EPC 'B', with Madrid having recently achieved an EPC 'A' rating.
Supporting impactful local causes through the position we hold in our communities has always been central to our culture and strategy of creating shared value for our stakeholders. As such, we provide NewRiver-funded time for our staff to support causes which matter most to them, and to share team bonding opportunities in doing so.
Staff are able to participate in monthly volunteering opportunities with our corporate charity partner, Trussell, or elect to utilise their gifted volunteering time to support any cause that's particularly close to their hearts. In FY25, our support for Trussell provided:
of food donations, equating to approximately 28,459 portions or £4,269 worth of pasta, enough dinners for
20 families of 4 for a whole year
£579,802 of cumulative direct monetary donations raised since the beginning of our partnership in 2019
£72,280 of direct monetary donations during the year
105 hours of volunteered support, with a total value of
£1,6891


Speaking with Niall Pickup, Chair of Trustees, about the ongoing project at Merlin's Walk in Carmarthen, he advised "the new kitchen (donated by NewRiver) is a great resource. It allows us to cater when agencies book the space for area conferences and we hope to use it to provide cooking lessons for clients, dependent in part on getting volunteers for this. If we see fuel crises again next winter, we may use the space to provide a warm space for students to do their homework and have plans to provide them with soup as they study and are looking at the practicalities of providing breakfasts, perhaps once a week".

Company Information

Following the riots in Middlesbrough, the Hill Street shopping centre team partnered with the local authority, Police and Crime Commissioners office, Safer Communities, and Say no to Racism, to hold a combined event within the shopping centre. During the event, all partners were able to engage with the community and provide information and advice. There was an opportunity to listen to the community in a space that feels familiar and safe. The event was busy, and all partners will be looking at other dates so that they can continue this important work.
At our centres
561 hours spent by on-site staff supporting community initiatives
£152,801
monetary donations raised by aggregate charity fundraising activities
361
social, community or charitable initiatives supported
ESG report continued


The Broadway Shopping Centre was delighted to support the Academy of Real Assets and the Palace for Life Foundation, in partnership with Derwent London and O'Shea construction, to host a week-long programme providing insight to young people looking to pursue a career in real estate. Participants were welcomed on a site tour of the centre, accessing all front and back of house areas to understand how we operate, including commercial considerations, security, and health & safety. The programme also included a CV and mock interview workshop hosted at Selhurst Park, which our centre manager Rai Holdstock supported.
The site teams across the Capital & Regional portfolio each developed a Community Wheel of Support which outlines the social-value generating actions, tasks, events, activities, and targets for the year ahead, identifying the key stakeholders to be involved with and benefit from the planned initiatives. Over the course of 2024, these action plans delivered:

772 hours spent by on-site staff in support of the BID
193 community groups supported
982 volunteering hours spent
881 hours spent interacting with community groups
256 community events hosted
£374,154 of community investment made
£363,403
of "Capital & Regional Cares" fundraising
£574,332 of support to community services
183 charities supported
As a company, we are committed to a culture of diversity and inclusion in which everyone is given equal opportunities to progress regardless of gender, race, ethnic origin, nationality, age, religion, sexual orientation or disability. We continue to strive to provide the most flexible employment policies to enable all of our employees to combine a fulfilling career with an active home life. Disclosures provided in this section of our ESG report relate to the calendar year, for NewRiver only.
51:49 Company Male:Female ratio
71:29 ExCo Male:Female ratio
71:29 Board Male:Female ratio
* ESG diversity statistics relate to the calendar year, for NewRiver only
We have recently updated our Equal Opportunities policy to provide a comprehensive standalone policy statement which clearly communicates:
All staff have received externally delivered training to ensure full understanding of this policy, including types of discrimination and unconscious biases, to support its effective implementation
As part of the policy review process which produced our updated Equal Opportunities Policy, we also developed a Board Diversity Policy, which includes the following objectives:
In FY22, we took the decision to begin publishing our gender pay gap information. As we have fewer than 250 employees, we are not obliged by The Equality Act 2010 (Gender Pay Gap Information Regulations 2017) to disclose our gender pay gap, however we are pleased to provide our disclosure below in support of our commitment to DEI.
34% Mean gender pay gap
31% Median gender pay gap
This represents a 5% decrease in our mean gender pay gap since FY24, and a 6% decrease in our median gender pay gap. These fluctuations are driven by differences in the roles and seniority levels of male and female leavers and joiners to NewRiver over this period, including those that joined us from Ellandi following our acquisition of the business in July 2024.
In interpreting this gender pay gap disclosure, it is important to note that this is not a calculation of equal pay for equal work. The gender pay gap is the difference between the average annual salaries of men and women across all levels of the company, excluding any bonuses or other benefits received. The comparison is drawn across all departments of the business, spanning all levels of seniority. We adopt a strict equal pay for equal work policy, ensuring that all remuneration is managed in compliance with equality legislation.
Our purpose is to buy, manage and develop retail assets across the UK which provide essential goods and services, supporting the development of thriving communities. Our Board recognises our responsibility to ensure our portfolio can weather the physical and transitional risks created by a changing climate to ensure the long-term resilience of our business and the returns we achieve for our investors, as well as the all-important communities we serve.
| EPRA Code | Performance Measure | Unit(s) of Measure | FY24 | FY25 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gov-Board Composition of the highest governance body |
Number of executive board members | 2 | 2 | ||
| Number of independent/non-executive board members |
4 | 4 | |||
| Average tenure on the governance body | 4.6 | 4.3 | |||
| Number of independent/ non-executive board members with competencies relating to environmental and social impacts |
3 | 3 | |||
| Gov-Selec | Process for nominating and selecting the highest governance body |
Narrative on process | code to have a Nomination Committee which is responsible for identifying and nominating candidates to the Board. Please refer to page 126 for the latest report from the NewRiver Nomination Committee. |
As a Stock-Exchange-Listed business, NewRiver is required under the UK Corporate Governance | |
| Gov-Col Process for managing conflicts of interest |
Narrative on process | As a Stock-Exchange-Listed business, NewRiver is required under the UK Corporate Governance Code to identify and manage conflicts of interest. Directors also have duties under the Companies Act 2006. To manage this process, the Company Secretary keeps a register of all Directors' interests. The register sets out details of situations in which each Director's interest may conflict with those of the Company (situational conflicts). The register is reviewed at each Board meeting so that the Board may consider and authorise any new situational conflicts identified. At the beginning of each Board meeting, the Chair reminds the Directors of their duties under sections 175, 177 and 182 of the Companies Act 2006, which relate to the disclosure of any conflicts of interest prior to any matter that may be discussed by the Board. |
|||
| six-monthly basis. | There is also a staff conflicts of interest policy in place which requires any potential conflicts to be kept on a register and regularly updated. This is reviewed by the Audit Committee on a |
||||
| – | Board oversight of code of conduct | Narrative on process | reviewed by the audit committee. There have been no instances of non-compliance. | The Company has a code of conduct that is included in the staff handbook. Non-compliance would be a staff disciplinary matter. The Board, through its Audit Committee, has oversight of non-compliance. The Company also has a whistleblowing policy and process which is regularly |
|
| – | Due diligence of partner organisations | Narrative on process | a supplier's code of conduct. The Company also has a Modern Slavery policy. Suppliers are required to confirm that they agree to this Modern Slavery policy amongst other policies as part of the on-boarding process. |
The Company has implemented and Enhanced Supplier vetting process for suppliers and has | |
| – | Anti-corruption measures | Narrative on process | The Company has an Anti-bribery and anti-corruption policy. As part of this policy, there is a gifts policy and process. More information is available on pages 6&7 and 11&2 of our Code of Conduct. |
and hospitality approval process and register. The Gifts and Hospitality register is reviewed by the Audit Committee on a regular basis. A conflicts of Interest policy is also in place, as well as a whistle-blowing |
|
| – | Fines and settlements in connection with non-compliance with environmental, anti-bribery/ corruption, or other ESG-related regulation |
Total GBP of fines in past three years, type of non-compliance |
£0, no incidences of non-compliance. |
NewRiver is committed to embedding the recommendations of the Financial Stability Board's Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures (TCFD) within our approach to climate-related risk management. This disclosure aims to present a transparent account of our processes designed to support our journey towards a low-carbon business model, structured around the TCFD's four recommendation pillars: Governance, Strategy, Risk Management, and Metrics and Targets.
Glossary & Company Information

Dr Karen Miller Independent Non-Executive Director
As part of our membership of the Better Buildings Partnership (BBP) Climate Commitment, we adopt the BBP's definition of a climate resilient business in formulating our strategy. This definition considers that a climate resilient business: has a plan to mitigate the worst impacts of climate change by reducing its carbon emissions impact to net-zero; can adapt to operating in a world in which climate-driven disruption is more frequent and severe; and provides climaterelated information to investors, regulators, and other stakeholders in a useful and timely way.
Our FY25 disclosures represent our seventh consecutive TCFD report. We consider that the following report is consistent with the TCFD's Recommendations and supporting disclosures; these being the four pillars referenced above, and the eleven disclosures within, which are signposted throughout this report. The TCFD's Guidance for All Sectors has been considered in order to achieve consistency with the recommendations.
Our Board takes ultimate responsibility for our business' resilience against climate issues and the transition of our portfolio and Snozones to a low-carbon operating model. Material climate issues are considered by the Board when reviewing NewRiver's strategic approach to managing associated impacts on the day-today operation of our assets, to preserve our ability to create value for our investors and communities. Allan Lockhart, our Chief Executive and senior Board Director, retains overall accountability for our ESG programme and approach to climate matters.
The Board's oversight is supported by the ESG Committee, led by our Head of Asset Management and ESG, Emma Mackenzie. The Committee meets quarterly to oversee NewRiver's approach, which is guided by our Pathway to Net-Zero, whilst reviewing and ensuring that appropriate resources are mobilised to enable proactivity; for example, each asset receives an annual ESG budget to implement selected items from the Environmental & Social Plans. The Committee provides quarterly briefings to the Board, updating its members on key milestones achieved by the ESG programme.
The Board and the Audit Committee adopts an integrated risk management approach, in which ESG and climate issues are embedded. The Committee regularly evaluates NewRiver's risk appetite, together with emerging and principal risks which are captured in the risk register maintained by the Company. The Committee considers a range of risks across six risk categories, linked to our business model, strategic priorities, and external environment. Climate-related risk represents one of the principal risk categories. The Committee regularly evaluates changes to identified risks and ensures that appropriate controls are applied in alignment with the Board's risk appetite.
NewRiver's Board benefits from the climaterelated expertise of Dr Karen Miller, appointed in Q1 FY23. Karen supports the Board's consideration of all climate-related issues escalated by the ESG Committee. The Board's training requirements in respect of climaterelated issues are reviewed annually. The most recent session delivered to the Board was on the findings of the net-zero audits we undertook across a sample of our assets, and how these findings relate to our broader strategy (FY24). Following the re-baselining of our net-zero targets, as discussed earlier in our ESG report, the Board will receive training on the SBTi's Building Sector Guidance and will be key to formulating our updated delivery plan.
Senior management is closely involved in our day-to-day approach to climate issues. Through her dual role as Head of Asset Management and ESG, Executive Committee member Emma Mackenzie regularly engages with asset and property management teams to ensure appropriate energy and carbon management processes and policies are integrated within all management activities and the operation of our Snozones. In addition, asset and property management teams interact with centre management to ensure that policies are implemented across the portfolio and that performance is tracked through our ESG programme.
Our internal teams and centre managers have all received ESG training during the year, delivered by our external consultants. We invest in these sessions to ensure that management personnel are kept abreast of the latest developments in sustainability best practice and evolving climate-related issues.
The Remuneration Committee includes ESG objectives as part of the bonus objectives for both the Board and Executive Management. This is a pre-defined percentage of bonus with a high degree of measurability, and forms part of the overall performance assessment.
NewRiver REIT plc | Annual Report and Accounts 2025 Governance Report Financial Statements ESG Data Sets 91 & Appendix Glossary & Company Information Strategic Report
TCFD report continued
TCFD strategy recommendations 'a' and 'c': describe the climate-related risks and opportunities the organisation has identified over the short, medium, and long term; and describe the resilience of the organisation's strategy, taking into consideration different climate-related scenarios, including a 2ºC or lower scenario

NewRiver considers climate-related risks, as well as opportunities, that may arise from both the physical impacts of climate change and the transition of our managed assets to a lowcarbon operating model.* We identify climaterelated issues across short (to 2030), medium (to 2040), and long-term (to 2050 and beyond) horizons, appropriately defined to inform our ESG and corporate strategies.
The Relevance Assessment that follows outlines the principal risks and opportunities we have identified and the ways in which they have the potential to impact our business, alongside definitions of low, medium, and high impacts in the context of each of the risks.
Our assessment considers transitional risks and opportunities associated with the international goal of keeping warming to within 1.5-degrees above pre-industrial levels - as our strategy is based on this objective – and therefore assumes that the end date for achieving net-zero is 2050. Our analysis of physical risk exposure, undertaken by an external consultant, was updated in March 2025 to incorporate our new assets following our acquisition of Capital & Regional, including the Snozone operations. The assessment modelled three climate scenarios: SSP1-2.6, SSP2-4.5, and SSP5-8.5.
SSP1-2.6 is a low carbon scenario in which global CO2e emissions are cut severely and societies prioritise more sustainable practices, with focus shifting from economic growth to overall wellbeing. As a result, warming stabilises at approximately 1.8°C by the end of the century. This scenario has been used as the "best case" scenario because climate modellers are no longer optimistic that limiting warming to 1.5-degrees above pre-industrial levels is feasible, and so we consider that SSP1-2.6 reasonably represents a scenario in which meaningful efforts are made to pursue this goal, despite temperatures eventually stabilising at a slightly higher level. SSP2-4.5 is a 'middle of the road' scenario in which global emissions remain at current levels before starting to fall midcentury, but do not reach net-zero by 2100. Socioeconomic factors follow their historic trends and progress towards sustainability is slow. In this scenario, temperatures rise by 2.7°C by the end of the century. SSP5-8.5 is a high carbon scenario in which current CO2e emissions double by 2050 due to the growth of the global economy being fuelled by fossil fuels and energy-intensive practices.
This scenario corresponds to approximately 4.4°C of warming by the end of the century.
The assessment considered eight key climate hazards including temperature-related, wind-related and water-related hazards. Through the analysis, three key hazards have been identified as relevant to our portfolio (see Relevance Assessment).
The Impact Assessment that follows provides our analysis of the relevant level of potential impact of each risk, their probability, and time horizon over which these impacts could manifest. Consistent with our transitional risk analysis, we have presented the baseline potential impacts using a low carbon scenario.
Our strategy is designed to enable us to build resilience considerations into the acquisition and operation of our assets as an integral part of our overall approach to asset management. As our portfolio consists of assets located in the UK only, there is little variation in exposure levels to both transitional and physical risks and opportunities across our assets. Our net-zero pathway and the interim targets we have set ourselves guide our approach to remaining resilient to principal transition risks. The findings of our physical risk assessment and sensitivity analysis using low and high carbon scenarios show that there is minimal change to the exposure of our portfolio to physical climate risks in the best- and worst-case scenarios.
We have mapped relevant risks and opportunities within our Impact Assessment based on a low carbon scenario, with the direction of the arrows indicating the potential change in our exposure to each risk and opportunity under a high carbon scenario.
In a high carbon scenario, exposure to regulatory and associated asset transition risks has the potential to reduce, as the scenario assumes that society will continue to rely heavily on fossil fuels and energy intensive activities to drive economic growth, and so regulatory and technological tools may not advance in the way they are assumed to in the low-carbon scenario. Despite economic acceptance of fossil fuel reliance in this scenario, we have assumed that reputational and market risk would increase, as demand for carbon offsets could increase further in an attempt to compensate for fossil fuel usage, while customer demand for action may also become further heightened as the effects of climate change become increasingly apparent. Exposure to certain physical risks may also increase, as the higher degree of warming contributes to more extreme weather events and patterns. Across the NewRiver portfolio specifically, this degree of change is modelled to be immaterial, however we recognise that there would be much more significant changes across the globe, including irreversible impacts on fragile ecosystems, that we should collectively strive to avoid.
As our strategy is aligned to the best available scientific recommendations from the SBTi (please see page 72 for details of our targets) and our approach to the sustainable management of our assets strives for continuous environmental performance improvements, whilst physical risk analysis showed no material movements in risk exposure under higher carbon scenarios, we do not envisage that we need to amend our risk management strategy based on different warming scenarios.

| NewRiver REIT plc Annual Report and Accounts 2025 | |
|---|---|
NewRiver REIT plc | Annual Report and Accounts 2025 Governance Report Financial Statements ESG Data Sets 92 & Appendix Glossary & Company Information Strategic Report
Climate change strategy (Risk 4a1): a failure to implement appropriate climate risk management measures, comply with evolving regulations and meet our ESG targets could impact the operation and value of our assets, leading to a risk of asset obsolescence, reputational damage, and erosion of investor value
| Category & Indicator |
Risk Type |
Risk Description |
Relevance to NewRiver |
Low Impact Definition |
Medium Impact Definition |
High Impact Definition |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Policy & Legal PL1 |
Energy efficiency and carbon regulations relating to managed assets |
Evolving policy designed to support the UK's 2050 net-zero commitment requires capital expenditure to achieve compliance but also highlights opportunities to reduce operational costs, support occupier demand, improve resilience, and implement measures that ultimately support our own net-zero ambitions. |
We have mitigated the short-term MEES risk associated with our portfolio, however there are proposals to increase the minimum thresholds in future. 72% of our EPCs are currently compliant with the previously proposed 2027 requirements (C+), and 41% already compliant with 2030 proposals (B+). Whilst there remains uncertainty around these proposals, we have assessed the probability of an increase to the MEES threshold to be high. We have undertaken a cost assessment of achieving compliance with the previously proposed 2030 minimum threshold, assuming that current feasibility tests will remain relevant. |
Costs of <£2million to improve asset performance in accordance with regulations |
Costs of £2-10million to improve asset performance in accordance with regulations |
Costs of >£10million to improve asset performance in accordance with regulations |
| Technology T1 |
Costs to transition managed assets to low-carbon model |
Opportunities exist to implement a range of technologies and system improvements designed to reduce environmental impact and transition our assets to a decarbonised operational model. These systems will come at a cost, and require lifecycle carbon considerations to be factored in. We will engage our occupiers to ensure our ambitions are aligned and make sensible system replacements at the time that current systems reach a point in their useful lives that the lifecycle carbon and operational cost implications are beneficial to our occupiers as well as our net-zero journey, which will support usual service charge processes. |
We are in the assessment phase of most solutions at this stage on our net-zero pathway, with implementation being focused on opportunities to reduce the energy demand of our assets ahead of decarbonisation. We are in the process of assessing the opportunity to remove gas supplies from The Avenue, Newton Mearns, ensuring that any electrification solution achieves our decarbonisation goal whilst delivering value to our retailers. We will continue to take this approach as and when key systems require replacement - an opportunity that has already been realised at two of the Capital & Regional centres. We also commissioned a portfolio-wide desktop review of solar PV opportunities, including the Capital & Regional sites. From this initial review, we instructed four detailed assessments and will be progressing with a minimum of one installation project during FY26. |
Costs of <£2million to improve asset performance in accordance with regulations |
Costs of £2-10million to improve asset performance in accordance with regulations |
Costs of >£10million to improve asset performance in accordance with regulations |
| Reputation R1 |
Reputational damage based on ineffective response to climate change |
Societal environmental consciousness is continually on the rise and there is a widespread consensus that we must strive to keep warming to within 1.5 degrees. Businesses that fail to keep pace with this moral shift risk reputational damage. We must continuously work towards, and monitor our progress against, our SBTi-approved emissions reduction targets. We must ensure that our initial targets are reviewed as and when new scientific recommendations or sector-specific methodologies emerge. |
We have committed to becoming a net-zero business and developed our pathway to achieving this commitment. We have committed to the SBTi's recommendations of reducing absolute emissions by 42% by 2030 and achieving net-zero by 2050 in pursuit of a 1.5-degree future. We are currently reviewing the SBTI's new Buildings Sector guidance and considering relevant revisions to our targets to align with this latest sector-specific best practice guidance, including re-baselining. |
Limited reputational impact if response to climate change is ineffective |
Temporary reputational impact if response to climate change is ineffective, with sufficient time to remedy |
Significant reputational impact if response to climate change is ineffective or not operational by required date |
| Market M1 |
Increased costs to offset unabated emissions as part of our net-zero strategy |
There has been a significant, recent, increase in corporate net-zero commitments which may drive demand for credible carbon offsets, resulting in cost increases. Potential future regulation may also contribute to this risk. |
We have committed to ensuring that any offsets purchased as part of our net-zero strategy are additional, not overestimated, lead to permanent removals, do not support double counting, and do not cause wider social or environmental harm. We have purchased offsets, validated by the Woodland Carbon Code, in connection with our corporate target. The scope of this purchasing requirement will increase in 2040 when we bring the landlord-controlled areas of our portfolio to net-zero, and then increase again in 2050 when we become fully net-zero. |
Minimal cost increase of no more than 25% |
Considerable cost increase of 50-100% |
Significant cost increase of over 100% |
| NewRiver REIT plc Annual Report and Accounts 2025 | Strategic Report | Governance Report | Financial Statements | ESG Data Sets | Glossary & | 93 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TCFD report continued
Climate change impacts on our assets (Risk 4b): changes in the way consumers live, work, shop and use technology could have an adverse impact on demand for our assets, whilst the physical impacts of a changing climate could cause damage or disruption to the operation of our assets
| Category & Indicator |
Risk Type |
Risk Description |
Relevance to NewRiver |
Low Impact Definition |
Medium Impact Definition |
High Impact Definition |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market M2 |
Changing customer behaviour | The nature of this risk is two-fold in that it has potential impacts from both an occupier and consumer perspective. Changes in consumer shopping preferences present an opportunity to leverage our ESG strategy to demonstrate the ways in which we actively cater to the evolving needs of our occupiers' customers, but also present a potential risk if the perception is that our ESG strategy does not fulfil their expectations. |
We must be able to demonstrate that our centres are environmentally and socially conscious places for retailers and end customers. Failure to do so could have a negative impact on demand for our assets. We are working on ways to better communicate directly with customers on the environmental action we take, for example, by introducing routine communication of recycling rates at our centres, and how we can improve them by working together. |
Changes in customer behaviour are well accounted for by our existing strategy & offering, with impact being only resource requirements to achieve this |
There is room for our strategy to improve its alignment with changing customer behaviour, leading to some reduction in demand |
Our strategy falls short of customer expectations and demand for our assets is hampered |
| Physical PH1 PH2 PH3 |
Acute Physical Hazards and Chronic Stressors caused by a Changing Climate |
As average global temperatures rise, so too does the exposure of real assets to acute climate hazards and chronic stressors. This risk category has been assessed under a high (SSP-8.5 representing ~4.4 degrees of warming) and low (SSP1-2.6 representing ~1.8 degrees of warming) carbon scenario up to the year 2100, considering eight key climate risks including temperature-related, wind-related and water-related hazards. Through this assessment, some risks were discounted as relevant to our portfolio, such as hail and wild fire. Our risk disclosure includes only those hazards identified as highly relevant. |
Three hazards have been identified to have the potential to pose a high risk to our portfolio: drought (PH1), flooding (PH2) and heat (PH3). Whilst NewRiver is not a water-intensive business, drought poses the highest risk to our portfolio as there are widespread areas of water stress across England. The data shows this to be the case under current climate conditions, and so the risk has been categorised as "short-term". Flood risk is relevant to four of our assets, whilst heat risk is relevant to our Snozone in Madrid, which is projected to experience ~44 days per year of temperatures exceeding 35-degrees by 2050 in a low emissions scenario. Impacts have been quantified in financial terms by costing measures to adapt our assets to the relevant risks, applying average costs by measure provided by Cushman & Wakefield. Measures include items such as flood pumps, rainwater harvesting, water saving devices (aerators and pressure-reducing valves), leak detection systems, and upgrading air conditioning systems to accommodate future heat patterns. Through our assessment of these risks under both a high and low emissions scenario, we were able to establish that there is no material variation in exposure levels under each scenario. |
Costs of <£2million to improve asset performance in accordance with regulations |
Costs of £2-10million to improve asset performance in accordance with regulations |
Costs of >£10million to improve asset performance in accordance with regulations |
Company Information
TCFD report continued
Impact

TCFD report continued
Strategic Report
The Board has a low risk tolerance for principal risks affecting our business, including climaterelated issues. Consistent with this appetite, our robust ESG programme guides our actions on our pathway to net-zero and supports our response to climate-related issues through the implementation of asset-level initiatives designed to improve efficiency, reduce environmental impact, and enhance resilience. We have embedded ESG and climate considerations throughout our business processes, departments, and functions. Environmental considerations are embedded into capital allocations and are considered for all future acquisitions. The following diagram depicts the actions and processes we have identified as part of our strategy to deliver on our climate ambitions in the context of our business model and financial planning.

& Appendix
Glossary & Company Information
Climate-related risks are identified through NewRiver's integrated risk management framework. Our risk management framework considers both emerging and principal risks with the potential to impact our business. We maintain a risk register that considers a range of categories, including environmental and climate change risks. The risk register assesses the impact and likelihood of each identified risk, which is translated into a risk heat map. Where the residual risk does not align with the Board's risk appetite, management actions are recommended with a view to mitigating the relevant risk.
Strategic Report
Accountability for mitigating actions is assigned to an Asset Management Director and property manager. This approach allows NewRiver to ensure there is a top-down understanding of principal risks across the business, backed by bottom-up mechanisms to support monitoring by management and their ability to address principal risks in a timely manner. With the support of our centre managers, we implement a host of initiatives designed to manage environmental impact and promote the efficient and resilient operation of our assets. This also includes, for example, building safety assessments which review the risk of loose roof/ facade features, which support mitigation of physical risks such as wind and storm damage.
Climate-related risk represents one of the six principal risk categories evaluated by the Board and Audit Committee as part of the business' overall risk management process. This category encompasses the individual risks identified within this TCFD disclosure, grouping them into two categories based on the nature of their potential impact. Risk 4a: "failure to implement appropriate climate risk management measures, comply with evolving regulations and meet our ESG targets could impact the operation and value of our assets, leading to a risk of asset obsolescence, reputational damage, and erosion of investor value" and risk 4b: "changes in the way consumers live, work, shop and use technology could have an adverse impact on demand for our assets, whilst the physical impacts of a changing climate could cause damage or disruption to the operation of our assets".
Please see pages 98-110 for a detailed presentation of how the identification, assessment, and management of climaterelated risks are integrated into NewRiver's overall risk management processes.
Annually, we disclose a suite of climate-related metrics which track our performance towards realising our core objective of minimising our environmental impact. These metrics are aligned with EPRA's best practice recommendations for transparently disclosing sustainability performance. The EPRA performance tables on pages 210-212 present our FY25 performance across these metrics, alongside historical performance.
We also monitor the following metrics associated with each of the principal climate-related risks identified:
| Risk Type | Risk Description | Metrics | Monitoring Frequency |
|---|---|---|---|
| Policy & Legal | Energy/ carbon regulations |
Portfolio EPC profile page 212 |
Continuous |
| Technology | Costs to transition/ decarbonise assets |
Energy usage intensity page 211 |
Monthly by centre teams via our energy broker's management platform |
| Reputation | Reputational damage based on ineffective response to climate change |
Scope 1, 2 & 3 GHG emissions pages 76-77 |
Annual quantification with monthly monitoring through energy management |
| Market | Increasing costs of carbon offset credits |
Cost projections from market sources |
Annually |
| Changing customer behaviour |
Customer engagement via asset management and centre management teams, alongside wider consumer / market research |
Continuous | |
| Physical Risk Exposure |
Drought, flooding and heat |
Estimated cost of implementing adaptation measures across "at risk" properties |
The assessment was updated in March 2025 and will be reviewed as necessitated by changes to our portfolio |
In accordance with our reporting obligations under the UK's Streamlined Energy and Carbon Reporting regulations, we disclose our annual carbon emissions performance. Please refer to pages 76-77, where we provide further information on our FY25 emissions performance, together with a comparison against our historical performance and the methodologies used to prepare these disclosures.
Following the release of the Science Based Targets initiative's (SBTi) Corporate Net-Zero Standard in October 2021 – the world's first framework for corporate net-zero targets consistent with a 1.5°C future – we published our Pathway to Net-Zero and received validation from the SBTi for our Scope 1 and 2 emissions reduction targets. Science-based targets (SBTs) provide companies with a clearly defined pathway to future-proof growth by specifying how much and how quickly they need to reduce their GHG emissions to achieve a net-zero world by no later than 2050. Pragmatic net-zero strategies place the corporate SBT methodology at their heart, prioritising decarbonisation before the use of carbon offsets. This is the approach that we will take in pursuing the following targets from an FY20 baseline:
| Target | Performance |
|---|---|
| Our corporate emissions will be brought to net-zero by 2025 |
We have fully mitigated our market-based Scope 1 & 2 emissions (47% location-based) and offset our unabated Sc3 emissions (560 tonnes CO2e) |
| We will achieve a 42% reduction in total absolute emissions by 2030 |
We have reduced absolute emissions (Scopes 1-3) by 39% as of FY25 |
| Our landlord-controlled portfolio emissions will be brought to net-zero by 2040 |
We have reduced absolute landlord-controlled portfolio emissions (scopes 1-3) by 37% as of FY25 |
| Our tenant-controlled portfolio emissions, and emissions associated with our development activities, will be brought to net-zero by 2050 |
We have committed to measuring the lifecycle carbon impact of major redevelopment projects, established a process for monitoring retailers' climate-related commitments, and improved our scope 3 collection |
Glossary & Company Information
Strategic Report
Risk is inherent in all businesses and effective risk management enables us to manage both the threats and the opportunities associated with our strategy and the operation of our business model.
Our relatively small workforce encourages flexibility and collaboration across the business in all areas including risk management. The accessibility and flexibility of the Board and senior staff are particularly pertinent when adapting to evolving risks, emerging risks and external risks such as economic or geopolitical instability. This flexibility enables the business to adjust and respond to fast-changing situations and prove its resilience and adaptability.
The Board has ultimate responsibility for the risk management and internal controls framework of the Group and regularly evaluates appetite for risk, ensuring our exposure to risk is managed effectively. The Audit Committee monitors the adequacy and effectiveness of the Group's risk management and internal controls and supports the Board in assessing the risk mitigation processes and procedures. The Executive Committee is closely involved with day-to-day risk management, ensuring that it is embedded within the Group's culture and values and that there is a delegation of accountability for each risk to senior management.
The identification of risks and their management is a continual and evolving process. This has been underscored more so over recent years in which global macroeconomic and geopolitical events have created uncertainty across all sectors, both economically and socially. Geopolitical events have also impacted supply chains and sentiment.
The Group maintains a risk register in which a range of categories are considered. These risks are linked to the business model and strategic priorities of the Group. The risk register assesses the impact and probability of each identified risk. By identifying all risks on a register and continuously updating this register, principal risks can be identified as those that might threaten the Group's business model, future performance, solvency or liquidity and reputation. Their potential impact and probability will also be a factor in whether they are classed as principal. The risk register also records actions that can be taken to further mitigate the risk and each action is assigned to an individual or group. Mitigation factors and actions are assigned to all risks whether they are principal, non-principal or emerging.
The continuous updating of this risk register allows us to assess how risks are evolving, assists in identifying emerging risks as they develop and ensures that the impact of each identified risk is continually monitored as it emerges and progresses.
Emerging risks by their very nature may 'emerge' and eventually become principal risks or they may reduce as circumstances and strategy changes. During FY23, for instance, we identified an emerging depositor risk as our cash holdings continued to build up. This risk was not a principal risk but by identifying the emerging risk as it has developed, we were able to update our treasury policies to ensure that they were fit for purpose and that cash was spread across various banking institutions. We continued to monitor this in FY24 and FY25 and a Board-approved counterparty list was continuously monitored using S&P and Fitch credit ratings. The treasury policy dictated the maximum exposure to a counterparty based on their rating. The operation of the treasury policy was reported to the Board on a quarterly basis. The emerging risk also created an opportunity as the Group was able to take advantage of favourable deposit opportunities. Since the acquisition of Capital & Regional these deposits have reduced and therefore there is no longer an emerging risk in this area and the risk register has been updated accordingly. Whilst we have not identified any specific emerging risks during FY25, we do continue to monitor AI and its potential impact on technology and consumer habits, regulation and our stakeholders. Like many emerging factors, AI can pose both a risk and an opportunity. To explore the potential opportunities AI has to offer the business, we have set up a working group of representatives from IT, Finance, Asset Management, Regeneration and Research.
The Board has a low-risk appetite for compliance (legal and regulation) related risk. The Board however recognises that the external environment in which it operates is inherently risky. Mitigating actions are therefore agreed for all risks that exceed the Group's risk appetite. Our experienced leadership team continuously works to mitigate the risks arising from the external environment in the following ways:
Principal risks and uncertainties continued
Collectively responsible for managing risk, overseeing the internal controls framework and determining risk appetite
Regularly reviews the entire risk register - members are responsible for managing risk within their area of accountability
Members are responsible for managing risk within their assets and highlighting risks as they emerge
Conducts individual risk reviews with ExCo members and individual business areas. Maintains the risk register and presents an update to the ExCo, the Audit Committee and the Board at least twice a year. Has responsibility for training staff on policies and regulations.
NewRiver REIT plc | Annual Report and Accounts 2025 Governance Report Financial Statements ESG Data Sets 100 & Appendix Glossary & Company Information Strategic Report
Principal risks and uncertainties continued

Key
Strategic pillars
operations of our occupiers or the spending
Responsibility Board & ExCo
Strategic alignment 1 2 3
habits of the UK population.
Impact
Probability
Movement
| Risk and impact | Monitoring and management | Change in risk assessment during the period |
|---|---|---|
| 1. Macroeconomic | ||
| Economic conditions in the UK and changes to fiscal and monetary policy may impact market |
• The Board regularly assesses the Group's strategy in the context of the wider |
• Macroeconomic risk has remained the same during the year and is considered a medium to |
| activity, demand for investment assets, the | macroeconomic environment. This continued | high impact risk with a high probability. |
confidence indices.
sufficiently resilient.
cash flow.
• Sentiment has been impacted by interest rates, geopolitical issues and inflation.
2. Political and regulatory Changes in UK Government policy and its
adverse effects on strategy and/or our tenants or the impact of political uncertainty on consumers' retail and leisure spend.
| Responsibility | Board & ExCo |
|---|---|
| Strategic alignment | 1 2 3 |
| Impact | |
| Probability | |
| Movement |
• The Board regularly considers political and regulatory developments and the impact they could have on the Group's strategy and operating environment.
• Closely monitoring rent collection and
• Our portfolio is focused on resilient market sub-sectors such as essential retailers. • Through regular stress testing of our portfolio we ensure our financial position is
review of strategy focuses on positioning our portfolio for the evolving economic situation. • The Board and management team consider updates from external advisers, reviewing key indicators such as forecast GDP growth, employment rates, interest rates and Bank of England guidance and consumer
| Risk and impact | Monitoring and management | Change in risk assessment during the period |
|---|---|---|
| ----------------- | --------------------------- | --------------------------------------------- |
An external event such as civil unrest or a civil emergency including a large-scale terrorist attack or pandemic, could severely disrupt global markets and cause damage and disruption to our assets.
| Responsibility | Board & ExCo | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Strategic alignment | 1 2 3 |
||
| Impact | |||
| Probability | |||
| Movement |
| Key | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Strategic pillars Disciplined capital allocation |
|||
| 2 | Leveraging our platform | |||
| 3 | Flexible balance sheet | |||
| Environmental, Social and Governance | ||||
| Impact and probability | ||||
| Low | ||||
| Medium | ||||
| High | ||||
| Risk change during FY25 | ||||
| Increased | ||||
| Decreased | ||||
| No change | ||||
A failure to implement appropriate climate risk management measures, comply with evolving regulations or meet our ESG targets could impact the operation and value of our assets, leading to a risk of asset obsolescence, reputational damage and erosion of investor value.
| Board & ExCo | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 2 3 |
||
| Risk and impact | Monitoring and management | Change in risk assessment during the period | Key | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4b. Climate change impacts on our assets | Strategic pillars | ||||
| Adverse impacts from environmental incidents such as extreme weather or flooding could impact the operation of our assets. A failure to implement appropriate climate risk management measures at our assets could lead to erosion of investor value and increases in insurance premiums. |
• We regularly assess assets for environmental risk and ensure sufficient insurance is in place to minimise the impact of environmental incidents. • In conjunction with insurers, flood risk assessments have been carried out at all of our assets and the risk is considered low. |
• Climate change impacts on our assets risk has remained the same during the period and is considered a medium to high impact risk with a medium probability. The probability of this risk is set at medium as governments globally, including the UK Government, continue to take insufficient action and temperatures continue to rise. |
1 | Disciplined capital allocation | |
| 2 | Leveraging our platform | ||||
| 3 | Flexible balance sheet | ||||
| Environmental, Social and Governance | |||||
| Responsibility | Board & ExCo | • Although exposure to extreme weather events is a |
|||
| near-term risk, other chronic climate stressors | Impact and probability | ||||
| Strategic alignment | 1 2 3 |
such as heat and sea level rises are medium-term or long-term time horizons. Whilst their impact on |
Low | ||
| Impact | affected assets has the potential to be high, their probability is medium in the short to medium term. |
Medium |
• Climate impacts are embedded into capital allocation decisions and considered for all future acquisitions of both equipment installed at our assets and for the assets themselves.

| shop and use technology could have an | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| adverse impact on demand for our assets. | |||
| Responsibility | Board & ExCo | ||
| Strategic alignment | 1 2 3 |
||
| Impact |
Changes in the way consumers live, work,
5. Changes in technology and consumer habits and demographics
Probability
Movement
Probability
Movement
| Risk and impact | |
|---|---|
| ----------------- | -- |
A cyber attack could result in the Group being unable to use its IT systems and/or losing data. This could delay reporting and divert management time. This risk could be increased due to employees continuing to work from home following the pandemic and due to geopolitical events.
| Responsibility | Board & ExCo |
|---|---|
| Strategic alignment | 1 2 3 |
| Impact | |
| Probability | |
| Movement |
| Strategic pillars | |
|---|---|
| 1 | Disciplined capital allocation |
| 2 | Leveraging our platform |
| 3 | Flexible balance sheet |
| Environmental, Social and Governance | |
| Impact and probability | |
| Low | |
| Medium | |
| High | |
| Risk change during FY25 | |
| Increased |
Decreased No change
| Risk and impact | Monitoring and management | Change in risk assessment during the period | Key | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7. People | Strategic pillars | ||||
| The inability to attract, retain and develop | • Attracting, retaining and developing talent |
• The probability of the People risk has increased |
1 | Disciplined capital allocation | |
| our people and ensure we have the right skills in place could prevent us from implementing |
is core to our HR strategy, which is regularly reviewed by the Board and Executive |
during the year. It is considered a medium to high impact risk with a medium to high |
2 | Leveraging our platform | |
| our strategy. | Committee. | probability. | 3 | Flexible balance sheet | |
| Responsibility | • We undertake an extensive Employee |
• The integration of another business and perceived change may cause staff concerns. |
|||
| Board & ExCo | Engagement Survey once a year to gauge | Environmental, Social and Governance | |||
| Strategic alignment | 1 2 3 |
employee views on leadership, company culture, health and wellbeing, personal |
• Although inflation puts pressure on salary costs and demands, this impact is mitigated by an |
||
| growth and benefits and recognition. This | active employee engagement programme and | Impact and probability | |||
| Impact | informs any changes to HR policy. | the alignment of reward with both individual and | |||
| Probability | • We regularly benchmark our pay and benefits against those of peers and the |
Group-level performance. The vesting of the LTIP awards in both August 2023 and September |
Low | ||
| wider market. | 2024 has improved staff perceptions of these | Medium | |||
| Movement | • We regularly review the Group's resourcing |
long-term awards and improved their | |||
| requirements, performance management, | motivational impact. | High | |||
| talent and succession planning. | • We continue to focus on staff wellbeing and |
||||
| • Longer notice periods are in place for key employees. |
actively seek regular feedback from staff. The Sunday Times Best Places to Work 2024 survey was strongly positive with NewRiver scoring |
Risk change during FY25 | |||
| • Our recruitment policies consider the needs |
Increased |
"excellent' in all criteria.
• We also offer many forms of flexible working including job share, annualised hours, variation of hours and working from home. Since the pandemic we have implemented a policy of enabling staff to work from home a number of days a week should they choose to do so.
Decreased
No change
of the business today and our aspirations for the future, whilst ensuring our unique corporate culture is maintained.
Decreased
No change
| Risk and impact | Monitoring and management | Change in risk assessment during the period | Key |
|---|---|---|---|
| 8. Financing | Strategic pillars | ||
| If gearing levels become higher than our risk | • The Board regularly assesses Group financial |
• Financing risk remained the same during the year |
1 Disciplined capital allocation |
| appetite or lead to breaches in bank covenants, this would impact our ability to |
performance and scenario testing, covering levels of gearing and headroom to financial |
and is considered a low to medium impact risk with a medium probability. |
2 Leveraging our platform |
| implement our strategy. The business could also struggle to obtain funding or face |
covenants and assessments by external rating agencies. |
• Macroeconomic developments, particularly the increase in inflation, have impacted financial |
3 Flexible balance sheet |
| increased interest rates as a result of macroeconomic factors. |
• The Group has a programme of active engagement with key lenders and |
markets. The strength of the Group's predominantly unsecured balance sheet means |
Environmental, Social and Governance |
| Responsibility Board & ExCo |
shareholders. • The Group has a predominantly unsecured |
we have significantly mitigated the risk of not being able to secure sufficient financing. |
|
| balance sheet, which mitigates the risk of a | • The Group extended the maturity on its undrawn |
Impact and probability | |
| 1 2 3 Strategic alignment |
covenant breach caused by fluctuations in | Revolving Credit Facility to November 2026 | Low |
| Impact | individual property valuations. • The Group has long-dated maturity on its |
during the prior year. | Medium |
| Probability | debt, providing sufficient flexibility for refinancing. |
High | |
| Movement | • Working capital and cashflow analysis and detailed forward assessments of cashflows |
||
| are regularly reviewed by the Executive | Risk change during FY25 | ||
| Committee. • Our credit rating is independently assessed |
Increased | ||
| by Fitch Ratings at least annually. |
| Risk and impact | Monitoring and management | Change in risk assessment during the period | Key |
|---|---|---|---|
| 9. Asset management | Strategic pillars | ||
| The performance of our assets may not meet with the expectations outlined in their business plans, impacting financial |
• Asset-level business plans are regularly reviewed by the asset management team and the Executive Committee and detailed |
• Asset management risk has remained the same during the year and is considered a medium to high impact risk with a medium probability. |
1 Disciplined capital allocation 2 Leveraging our platform |
| performance and the ability to implement our strategies. |
forecasts are updated frequently. • The Executive Committee reviews whole |
• Our diverse tenant portfolio focuses on essential retail which reduces the impact of individual |
3 Flexible balance sheet |
| Responsibility Board & ExCo |
portfolio performance on a quarterly basis to identify any trends that require action. |
tenant defaults. • Although we have a low probability of default, |
Environmental, Social and Governance |
| 1 2 3 Strategic alignment |
• Our asset managers are in contact with centre managers and occupiers on a daily |
the continued cost-of-living crisis may impact the financial health of our occupiers. |
Impact and probability |
| Impact | basis to identify potential risks and improvement areas. |
• Our operational performance continues to prove the resilience of our assets. |
Low |
| Probability | • Revenue collection is reviewed regularly by the Executive Committee. |
• New assets from the Capital & Regional acquisition have diversified the portfolio further. |
Medium |
| Movement | • Retailer concentration risk is monitored, with a guideline that no retailer will account for more than 5% of gross income (currently |
High | |
| our largest retailer is Boots accounting for 3.6% of gross income). |
Risk change during FY25 | ||
| 10. Development | Increased | ||
| Delays, increased costs and other challenges could impact our ability to pursue our |
• We apply a risk-controlled development strategy through negotiating long-dated |
• Development risk probability decreased during the period as the business currently has fewer |
Decreased |
| development pipeline and therefore our ability to profitably recycle development sites and achieve returns on development. |
pre-lets for the majority of assets. • All development is risk-controlled and forms only a small element of the portfolio by value. |
development projects. It is considered a medium impact risk with a low to medium probability. • Supply issues and increases in the cost of |
No change |
| building supplies will impact developments, |
| Responsibility | Board & ExCo |
|---|---|
| Strategic alignment | 1 2 3 |
| Impact | |
| Probability | |
| Movement |
| Risk and impact | Monitoring and management | Change in risk assessment during the period | Key Strategic pillars |
|---|---|---|---|
| 11. Acquisitions | |||
| The performance of asset and corporate acquisitions might not meet with our expectations and assumptions, impacting our |
• We carry out thorough due diligence on all new acquisitions, using data from external advisers and our own rigorous in-house |
• Acquisition risk has remained the same through the year and is considered a medium impact risk with a medium probability. |
1 Disciplined capital allocation 2 Leveraging our platform |
| revenue and profitability. | modelling before committing to any transaction. Probability-weighted analysis takes account of acquisition risks. |
• The lack of supply and relative price of some assets may reduce opportunities for acquisition. • We will deploy capital in line with our returns |
3 Flexible balance sheet |
| Responsibility Board & ExCo |
Environmental, Social and Governance | ||
| 1 2 3 Strategic alignment |
• Acquisitions are subject to approval by the Board and Executive Committee, who are |
focused approach to capital allocation and subject to our LTV guidance. |
|
| Impact | highly experienced in the retail sector. • We have the ability to acquire in joint |
Impact and probability | |
| Probability | ventures, thereby sharing risk. | Low | |
| Medium | |||
| Movement | High | ||
| 12. Disposals | |||
| We may face difficulty in disposing of assets | • Our portfolio is focused on high-quality |
• Disposal risk has remained the same during the |
Risk change during FY25 |
| or realising their fair value, thereby impacting profitability and our ability to reduce debt |
assets with low lot sizes, making them attractive to a wide pool of buyers. |
year and is considered a medium impact risk with a medium to high probability. |
Increased |
| levels or make further acquisitions. | • Assets are valued every six months by external valuers, enabling informed disposal |
• National and geopolitical uncertainty, interest rates, inflation and the cost-of-living crisis mean |
Decreased |
| Responsibility Board & ExCo |
pricing decisions. | that markets remain uncertain and are causing some purchasers to reconsider or delay acquisition decisions. • We have an active and successful disposal programme. The average lot size however is lower than most in the market so our assets tend to be more liquid. |
No change |
| 1 2 3 Strategic alignment |
• Disposals are subject to approval by the Board and Executive Committee, who are |
||
| Impact | highly experienced in the retail sector. • Our portfolio is large and our average asset |
||
| Probability | lot size is small, meaning that each asset represents only a small proportion of |
||
| Movement | revenues and profits, thereby mitigating the impact of a sale not proceeding. |
The UK Corporate Governance Code requires the Directors to appraise the viability of the Group over what they consider to be an appropriate period of assessment taking into account the Group's current position, its business model (page 4), strategy (page 5) and principal risks and uncertainties (pages 98 to 108).
In making this assessment, the Directors view the Group's focus on its resilient sub-sector of convenience retail, expertise in asset management and risk-controlled development, disposal track record and the strength of the Group's balance sheet as the key aspects supporting the long-term sustainability of the business.
The Directors consider the appropriate period of assessment to be three years from the current financial year end to 31 March 2028. This period of assessment is aligned to performance measurement and management remuneration, and in the opinion of the Directors, this period of assessment strikes the optimal balance of allowing the impact of strategic decisions to be modelled while maintaining the accuracy of underlying forecast inputs.
In making their viability assessment, the Directors assessed the potential impacts, in reasonable worst case scenarios, of the principal risks as set out on pages 98 to 108, together with the likely degree of effectiveness of mitigating actions reasonably expected to be available to the Group. The most relevant of these risks to viability, with the highest potential impact, were considered to be:
The Board is encouraged by the consistently strong operational performance of the Group's portfolio in recent years, during a sustained period of macroeconomic instability. While uncertainty around the prospects for the UK economy remains, some of the factors prevalent in the recent past, such as elevated inflation and interest rates have reduced over the last twelve months and importantly the Group retains the features which have allowed it to navigate past uncertainty such as its superior property yields, balance sheet strength, and low and fixed cost of debt.
The Group's annual budget, forecast and business planning process takes place in the final quarter of the financial year, with the final budget signed off by the Board early in the new financial year.
The exercise is completed at a granular level, on a lease-by-lease basis and considers the Group's profitability, capital values, loan to value, cash flows and other key financial metrics over the forecast period.
Following the Group divesting itself of its community pub business in FY22, the Group's clear strategic aim has been to reduce its non-core exposure, including Work Out assets, to ensure that the assets in its portfolio display only the characteristics of resilient retail. The Group considers that such retail assets are located in catchments with long-term growth potential and the right balance between the supply of physical retail space and demand for that space, with an offering that meets the everyday needs of customers while playing a distinct role within their communities.
During FY25, the Group continued to reduce its exposure to Work Out assets, selling a further two non-core assets, and has redeployed the significant firepower accumulated over recent years into the acquisition of Capital & Regional plc for £151 million which was funded through a combination of cash and shares. The acquisition increased the size of NewRiver's portfolio by 65% through the combination of high-quality, complementary assets with similarly low-risk tenant profile, which are now included in NewRiver's Core Shopping Centre portfolio.
The Group has maintained its balance sheet strength following the acquisition of Capital & Regional which is measured by considering Interest Cover Ratio, Net debt: EBITDA and LTV. Although LTV has increased to 42.3% following the transaction, above the Group's guidance for LTV to be below 40%, immediately post year end we completed the disposal of the Abbey Centre in Newtownabbey, which reduces our LTV to c.38% meaning we are within guidance with capacity to invest into accretive asset acquisitions. Interest Cover and Net Debt: EBITDA have maintained significant headroom to Policy following the acquisition.
The Directors believe that, following the reduction in the size of the Work Out portfolio in recent years, to just 3% of the portfolio by valuation, and the acquisition of Capital & Regional, the Group is well positioned to deliver attractive returns to shareholders.
The forecast scenario selected by the Directors to assess the Group's viability is based on the delivery of the individual asset business plans, including planned capital expenditure and planned disposals, and its ability to continue its access to borrowing facilities and operate the Group's debt structure within its financial covenants.
The principal debt currently drawn by the Group is the £300 million unsecured corporate bond which matures in March 2028, at the very end of the Viability Statement period of assessment. We have maintained our investment grade credit rating since the bond was launched in 2018 (most recently affirmed in September 2024 and re-affirmed in February 2025 following the Capital & Regional transaction) and, with the increased scale we now have and the strength of our financial position throughout the period of assessment, we are confident in our ability to refinance the bond when required.
The only other debt currently drawn by the Group is the single facility that we retained following the acquisition of Capital & Regional, the £140 million "Mall" facility secured against three of the assets acquired as part of the Capital & Regional transaction which matures in January 2027. Available cash and liquidity both
& Appendix
NewRiver REIT plc | Annual Report and Accounts 2025 Governance Report Financial Statements ESG Data Sets 110 Strategic Report
& Appendix
Glossary & Company Information
Viability statement continued
currently and throughout the assessment period is such that this secured loan can either be repaid in full and/or any requisite cure funded at any point. Under this scenario, the Group is forecast to maintain sufficient cash and liquidity resources and remain compliant with its financial covenants with significant headroom.
Further sensitivity analysis was performed on this scenario to align it with the assumptions used in the reasonable worst-case scenario for the going concern review (see the Going Concern section of note 1 to the financial statements). This includes removing all uncommitted acquisitions and disposals, assuming further valuation decline and a lower income collection rate. Even applying this sensitivity, the Group maintains sufficient cash and liquidity reserves to continue in operation throughout the assessment period and the drawn debt covenants could absorb a further valuation decline of 26% and a further 48% reduction in annual net rental income before breaching applicable covenant levels.
On the basis of this and other matters considered by the Board during the year, the Board has a reasonable expectation that the Group will be able to continue in operation and meet its liabilities as they fall due over the three-year period of their detailed assessment.
The Directors of NewRiver REIT plc have reviewed the current and projected financial position of the Group making reasonable assumptions about future trading and performance. Reasonable worst-case scenarios were applied to the assumptions and the Directors are satisfied that the going concern basis of presentation of the financial statements is appropriate.
Company Information
As NewRiver has fewer than 500 employees, it is not required to comply with the Non-Financial Reporting requirements contained within the Companies Act 2006. However, due to our commitment to promoting transparency in reporting and business practices, further information is provided on this page on a voluntary basis, to help stakeholders understand our position on key non-financial and sustainability matters.
| Topics | Key policies and standards1,2 | Additional information |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental matters | • Environmental Social Governance Policy • Net-Zero and Climate Resilience Policy • Social Value Policy • Green Procurement Policy • Biodiversity Position Statement • Sustainability Brief for Development |
For more on sustainability and environmental matters see pages 89 to 97 and the Sustainability section of our website: www.nrr.co.uk |
| Climate-related financial disclosures |
• Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures ("TCFD") |
For more on action on climate change see pages 89 and 97 and the Sustainability section of our website: www.nrr.co.uk |
| Our people | • Code of Conduct covering: |
For more on people and culture see pages 6, 20, 23, 59 and 60 to 61 |
| • Workplace behaviour • Equal opportunities • Working with NewRiver • Speaking up • Health and Safety • Wellbeing • Electronic communications |
For more on diversity and inclusion see pages 61 and 128 to 130 and the People & Culture section of our website: www.nrr.co.uk |
|
| Human rights | • Code of Conduct • Modern Slavery and Human Trafficking Statement |
For more on modern slavery see the Modern Slavery Statement on our website: www.nrr.co.uk |
| Social matters | • Social Value Policy |
For more on our stakeholder engagement see pages 58 to 67 |
| • Charity partnership with Trussell |
For more on the local community see page 64 and the Sustainability section of our website: www.nrr.co.uk |
|
| Anti-bribery and | • Whistleblowing Policy |
For our Audit Committee report see pages 131 to 135 |
| corruption | • Code of Conduct |
People & Culture section of our website: www.nrr.co.uk |
| • Gifts and Hospitality Policy • Anti-money Laundering Policy • Supply Chain Policy and Supplier Code of Conduct • Share Dealing Policy |
Modern Slavery Statement on our website: www.nrr.co.uk | |
| Business model | For more on our strategy and business model see pages 2 and 111 | |
| Principal risks | For more on our principal risks and uncertainties see pages 98 to 108 | |
| and uncertainties | For our viability statement see page 109 | |
| Non-financial key performance indicators |
For more on non-financial key performance indicators see pages 15 to 17 |
The Strategic Report was approved by the Board 16 June 2025
By order of the Board
Allan Lockhart Chief Executive Officer 1. Policies and further information can be found on the website: www.nrr.co.uk.
Company Information
Governance Report
| Governance Report | ||
|---|---|---|
| Chair's letter on governance | 114 | |
| Our leadership team | 115 | |
| Board leadership and Company purpose | 118 | |
| Nomination Committee Report | 126 | |
| Audit Committee Report | 131 | |
| Remuneration Committee Report Directors' Report |
136 157 |
The Governance section provides details of the Board's corporate governance structures and work for the financial year to 31 March 2025. Together with the Directors' Remuneration Report on pages 136 to 156, it includes information about how the Company has applied the principles and complied with the provisions of the 2018 UK Corporate Governance Code. The Governance section has been organised to follow the structure and principles (A to R) of the 2018 Code.
As a Company with an equity shares (commercial companies) listing on the London Stock Exchange, NewRiver is required under the Financial Reporting Council (FRC) Listing Rules to comply with the Code Provisions of the 2018 UK Corporate Governance Code issued in July 2018 (the '2018 Code') which is available on the FRC website (www.frc.org.uk). The Company confirms that for the year ended 31 March 2025, the Company applied the principles and complied with all Provisions of the Code.
The ways in which the Code's principles were applied during FY25 are evidenced in this Governance Report and throughout the Annual Report.
The index on this page sets out a list of page references against the Code principles (A to R).
The Board has reviewed and prepared for the 2024 iteration of the Code (the 'new Code') and notes that it applies to the Company with effect from FY26 that commenced on 1 April 2025. The Company will report against the new Code in its Annual Report for FY26.
| Board leadership and Company purpose | Found on page |
|---|---|
| A. An effective Board | 115 |
| B. Purpose, values and culture | 118 |
| C. Governance framework and Board resources | 121 |
| D. Stakeholder engagement | 58 |
| E. Workforce policies and practices | 111 |
| F. Board roles | 122 |
|---|---|
| G. Independence | 123 |
| H. External appointments and conflicts of interest | 123 |
| I. Key activities of the Board in FY25 | 119 |
| J. Appointments to the Board | 126 |
|---|---|
| K. Board skills, experience and knowledge | 128 |
| L. Annual Board and Committee evaluation | 125 |
| M. Financial reporting, external auditor and internal audit | 132 |
|---|---|
| N. Fair, balanced and understandable | 135 |
| O. Internal financial controls and risk management | 134 |
| P. Linking remuneration with purpose, values and strategy | 136 |
|---|---|
| Q. Remuneration Policy development | 136 |
| R. Performance outcomes in FY25 and strategic targets | 148 |
Glossary & Company Information

I have pleasure in introducing NewRiver's Governance Report for the year ended 31 March 2025. In my Chair's statement earlier in this Annual Report I talked about our transformational year. This Governance Report provides detail on how we manage ourselves to support our transformational growth, culture and strategy. The Board has overall responsibility for the leadership of the Company, setting the Company's values and standards and monitoring culture.
Part of the Board's oversight responsibility is to ensure that there is sound management and internal controls. This report outlines our governance structure and processes and the work of the Board and its Committees to ensure the Board responsibilities are fulfilled.
Margaret Ford stepped down as Chair on 30 May 2024 following a two-month handover process following my appointment on 20 March 2024 as Chair Designate. The search for a new Chair in FY24 was led by our Senior Independent Non-Executive Director, Alastair Miller. Alastair is now our longest serving Non-Executive Director and will reach nine years of service in June 2025. We have therefore commenced the process to find another Non-Executive Director. We expect however that Alastair will remain with us into 2026 so that we can continue to have access to his extensive experience and guidance as we continue to integrate Ellandi and Capital & Regional during FY26.
FY25 was a strategically busy year with the acquisitions of Ellandi and Capital & Regional plc. The Board has provided strategic counselling and guidance to the executive management before, during and after both transactions. To plan for FY26 and the continued growth plans, both the Board and ExCo spent time together off site in February 2025 for a strategy day and evening to plan for the future of the business. This extremely useful strategy session created action plans and workstreams to progress over FY26. A followup session is already planned in FY26 to work through these actions and workstreams.
Our stakeholders remain a key focus as we recognise our long-term successes rely on our relationships with our stakeholders and their evolving needs. All our stakeholder relationships have expanded and evolved this year with the acquisition of Ellandi and Capital & Regional. We have detailed how we engage with these stakeholders in our Stakeholder engagement section on pages 58 to 67. The Board receives regular updates on these relationships and also the Board, including the Non-Executive Directors, makes every effort to connect with stakeholders via asset visits and attending specific meetings. This year we have been particularly active in our engagement with shareholders and potential new investors with a placing of shares, which was over subscribed and a consultation with shareholders regarding the application of our Remuneration Policy. We look forward to welcoming and engaging with all shareholders again at our AGM in July.
Yours sincerely
16 June 2025

Lynn Fordham Non-Executive Chair | Appointed March 2024
Lynn joined the Board in March 2024 and is an experienced non-executive director. She was most recently Managing Partner of private investment firm Larchpoint Capital LLP, a position she held from 2017 to 2021. Prior to joining Larchpoint, Lynn was CEO of SVG Capital for eight years having previously served as CFO. Before that she held senior roles at Barratt Developments, BAA, Boots, ED&F Man, BAT and Mobil Oil. She also served as a non-executive director on the board of Fuller, Smith & Turner for seven years until 2018, chairing its Audit Committee. Lynn brings to the Board wide-ranging listed company, private equity and finance and transaction experience across a range of sectors.
Listed Companies: NCC Group plc (Non-Executive Director and Audit Committee Chair); Caledonia Investments plc (Non-Executive Director and Audit Committee Chair); Domino's Pizza Group plc (Senior Independent Director and Audit Committee Chair)
Other: Chair of RMA – The Royal Marines Charity; Enfinium Group Ltd (Non-Executive Director)

Allan Lockhart Chief Executive Officer | Appointed June 2016
Allan has over 30 years' experience in the UK retail real estate market. He started his career with Strutt & Parker in 1988 advising major property companies and institutions on retail leasing, investment and development. In 2002, Allan was appointed as Retail Director to Halladale Plc with a remit to acquire value add opportunities in the UK retail real estate market and ensure the successful implementation of asset management strategies. Following the successful sale of Halladale Plc in early 2007, Allan co-founded NewRiver and served as Property Director since its IPO until being appointed Chief Executive Officer in May 2018.
External Appointments None

Will Hobman Chief Financial Officer | Appointed August 2021
Will is a Chartered Accountant with over a decade of real estate experience, having qualified at BDO LLP working in its Audit and Corporate Finance departments. Before joining NewRiver in June 2016, Will worked at British Land for five years in a variety of finance roles, latterly in Investor Relations, and formerly within the Financial Reporting and Financial Planning & Analysis teams. Will obtained a BArch (Hons) in Architecture from Nottingham University before obtaining his ACA qualification, becoming an FCA in March 2020.
British Property Federation Finance Committee Member

Alastair Miller Senior Independent Director | Appointed January 2016
Alastair is a Chartered Accountant and has significant, recent and relevant financial experience. Throughout his career Alastair has developed skills in risk management, property, systems, company secretariat and investor relations. Having worked for New Look Group for 14 years, Alastair has an in-depth understanding of retailers and the factors that impact their trading and profitability. Alastair was formerly Audit Committee Chair and non-executive Director of Superdry, Chief Financial Officer of New Look Group, Group Finance Director of the RAC and Finance Director of a company within the BTR Group. In addition to being the Senior Independent Director, Alastair has responsibility for ensuring that the Board successfully engages with our workforce.
RNLI (Risk and Audit Committee Member and Council Member)

N

Dr Karen Miller Independent Non-Executive Director | Appointed May 2022
Dr Karen Miller is Co-Founder of the Cambridge Net Positive Lab. Karen is a sustainability expert with a proven track record of leading transformation through a collaborative applied approach in large national and international companies. Karen has over 25 years' experience of growing businesses in the retail sector through innovation.
Buckingham Palace Reservicing Programme Challenge Board; Director of Cambridge Net Positive Lab Ltd; Director of Lidwells Ltd


Charlie Parker Independent Non-Executive Director | Appointed September 2020
Charlie was previously Chief Executive and Head of the Public Service for the Government of Jersey from January 2018 until his retirement in March 2021. Prior to working in Jersey, Charlie was Chief Executive of Westminster City Council from December 2013 to December 2017 and Chief Executive of Oldham Metropolitan Borough Council from October 2008 to December 2013. During his various roles as a Chief Executive, Charlie oversaw the significant transformation and modernisation of a large number of public services often resulting in reduced costs and improved performance. He was also responsible for a range of large-scale capital infrastructure and regeneration projects in Jersey, Westminster and Oldham. Prior to 2008 he held a number of investment, development and regeneration roles across national and local government bodies for over 20 years.
Buckingham Palace Reservicing Programme Challenge Board; Griffin Investors Ltd; Financial Reporting Council


Colin Rutherford Independent Non-Executive Director | Appointed February 2019
Colin is an experienced public and private company chairman and independent director, with relevant sector experience including asset management, leisure and real estate. Colin is a member of the Institute of Chartered Accountants of Scotland.
Listed Companies: Evofem Biosciences Inc (Independent Director and Audit Committee Chairman)
Other: Allstones Sand Gravels Aggregates Trading Co. Ltd (Chairman); Brookgate Limited (Chairman); Donaldson Group Limited (Independent Director and Audit Committee Chairman); Rothley Group Limited (Chairman)
A N R

Kerin Williams Company Secretary | Appointed October 2020
Kerin is a Chartered Secretary with over 30 years' experience. Kerin has worked in-house in senior positions within company secretarial departments for a number of FTSE 100 and FTSE 250 companies in real estate, chemicals, banking and printing. Kerin has also worked in professional services as a company secretarial consultant; her most recent role was as Managing Director of Prism Cosec. Kerin graduated in Law, qualified as a Chartered Secretary in 1997 and is a Fellow of the Chartered Governance Institute.
| Committee membership | |
|---|---|
| Committee Chair | |
| A | Audit Committee |
| N | Nomination Committee |
| R | Remuneration Committee |

Edith Monfries Chief Operating and People Officer
She has over 30 years' experience in the retail and leisure property sector, combining Finance, Operational and HR roles, specialising in advising on strategic and operational matters.
Edith was appointed Head of HR at NewRiver in October 2018 and in her role as COO brings her expertise in talent development within the sector to the business including overseeing the transition and intergration of Ellandi and Capital & Regional.
Edith served as COO of NewRiver's pub business Hawthorn prior to its sale.
Edith sits on the Board of The Academy of Real Assets, a charitable partner of NewRiver's, and is a Trustee of Sinfonia Smith Square, serving as Chair of Audit & Risk.

Emma Mackenzie Head of Asset Management and ESG
Emma has overarching responsibility for the financial and operational performance of the retail portfolio incorporating the delivery of asset management plans and oversight of the property management function, including the asset integration of the Company's acquisition of Capital and Regional and Ellandi. Emma also leads the Company's Environmental, Social and Governance programme ensuring it is embedded in asset management strategies and the wider business.
Emma is a qualified chartered surveyor with over 25 years' experience in the retail property market having previously worked in private practice.
Emma chairs the Commercial Committee of the British Property Federation and was a Board member of the High St Task Force for five years.

Charles Spooner Head of Capital Markets
Charles is responsible for Capital Markets and Retail Parks throughout the UK and has 25 years' experience in the real estate investment and asset management sector.
Charles has benefitted from the broad experience as an asset manager at F&C REIT and RREEF, in an advisory capacity at Cushman Wakefield and as a retailer advising Specsavers on its agency and development activity. Charles is responsible for acquisitions, disposals, development and implementation of asset management strategies, with particular focus on the retail warehouse sector.

Morgan Garfield Head of Capital Partnership
Morgan is responsible for Capital Partnerships. Morgan joined the company in July 2024 following NewRiver's acquisition of Ellandi, the asset management company he co-founded in 2008.
Having spent 25 years working in real estate and real estate finance, Morgan has significant experience of structuring JV's with third party equity partners to invest in retail property and non-performing loans, including originating c. £1 billion of investments through JV structures for Ellandi.
Prior to founding Ellandi, Morgan was a Managing Director at Deutsche Bank where he led the UK real estate finance business. He built teams that originated more than £3 billion of loans and a servicing platform that managed a loan portfolio of more than €16 billion. Morgan began his banking career at Rothschild having graduated with an MA in Geography from the University of Cambridge.
Morgan chairs the British Property Federation Retail Board.

Mark Robinson Head of Regeneration
Mark is responsible for Regeneration projects across the portfolio. Mark joined the company in July 2024 following NewRiver's acquisition of Ellandi, the asset management company he co-founded in 2008.
Mark has over three decades of experience in retail property and placemaking, acting as an adviser, investor, developer and occupier. Mark formerly held the role of Revo President in 2019 and led the government's High Street Task Force in July 2020.
Chief Executive Officer | Appointed June 2016 See page 115 for key skills & experience.
Will Hobman Chief Financial Officer | Appointed August 2021 See page 115 for key skills & experience.
Strategic Report
& Appendix
Glossary & Company Information
Corporate governance continued
Our purpose is to own, manage and develop a portfolio of retail assets across the UK that provide essential goods and services to local people, help support thriving communities and deliver long-term premium returns for our shareholders.
The Board's role is to lead the Group and ensure that it delivers sustainable and growing returns for our shareholders over the longer term. NewRiver's business model and strategy are set out on pages 4 and 5 of the Strategic Report and describes the basis upon which the Group generates and preserves value over the long term.

2 Leveraging our platform
3 Flexible balance sheet
Underpinned by a committed ESG strategy
Read more about our business model on page 4
NewRiver's collaborative and supportive culture underpins our purpose and drives business practices. Although our workforce has increased during the year with the acquisitions of Ellandi and Capital & Regional, the workforce of around 80 employees is still relatively small so our culture continues to be able to provide people who work for us with a sense of purpose and an opportunity to thrive and develop as individuals. The proximity between Board and employees makes it easier for the Board to engage with employees and the Directors can monitor the culture in a way not possible for larger companies. The small size of our team also allows for flexibility and adaptability so that we can respond to fast-changing situations.
The Board oversees the Group's active approach to asset management and the strategy of developing and recycling convenience-led, community focused retail assets throughout the UK and this in turn contributes to the local communities and wider society.
The Board has overall authority for the management and conduct of the Group's business, strategy and development and is responsible for ensuring that this aligns with the Group's culture.
The Board, supported by the Company Secretary, ensures the maintenance of a system of internal controls and risk management (including financial, operational and compliance controls) and reviews the overall effectiveness of the systems in place. The Board delegates the day-to-day management of the business to the Executive Committee ("ExCo"). There is a Schedule of Matters reserved for the Board's decision which forms part of a delegated authority framework to ensure that unusual or material transactions are brought to the Board for approval. This Schedule of Matters is reviewed regularly to ensure that it is kept up to date with any regulatory changes and is fit for purpose. The last review was undertaken in May 2025. The Executive Committee also has its own Terms of Reference that fit within the governance framework and are approved by the Board.

Alastair Miller, our Senior Independent Director, has responsibility for ensuring that the Board successfully engages with our workforce. As Chair of the Remuneration Committee Alastair, has direct engagement with shareholders on Remuneration Policy and is therefore best placed to answer questions from the workforce on Director remuneration and its alignment to Group-wide remuneration and strategy.
We continue to have a relatively small workforce which allows a natural proximity between the Board and the workforce, making it easy for the Board to engage with staff directly, especially as the Directors regularly visit the London office and also the assets. This remains the case with the addition of Ellandi and Capital & Regional. Staff are invited on a regular basis to attend a group meeting with Alastair in the London office, or online if preferred. This year in March, we had to hold two sessions across the day to fit in all staff. Questions are invited ahead of the meeting as well as taken live on the day. The majority of staff attended this meeting either in person or online. Alastair took the opportunity to explain the role of the Board and its Committees and what it meant to be a public company, the role of governance in a public company and who the stakeholders of the Company were. He also discussed the benefits of the recent acquisitions to the business and the strategy ahead. Alastair then took questions from staff on this. Discussing his time on the Board, Alastair was quizzed on his biggest challenges during his tenure and the changes over the years. Staff discussed flexible working, the office arrangements with the integration of Ellandi and Capital & Regional into the head office and the geopolitical environment that the world and the business now faces.
(Led by Alastair Miller, our Senior Independent Non-Executive Director and Non-Executive Director, responsible for workforce engagement)
• Fundraising events with staff
| NewRiver REIT plc Annual Report and Accounts 2025 | Strategic Report | Governance Report | Financial Statements | ESG Data Sets & Appendix |
Glossary & Company Information |
120 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Board activities continued |
| Board activity during the year | Link to strategy | |
|---|---|---|
| Strategy | • The Board discusses progress against strategy at most meetings and receives updates on strategy in the CEO's report • Additional strategic papers have been considered by the Board at Board meetings during the year • Papers and presentations including those from advisers were considered by the Board relating to the acquisitions of Ellandi and Capital & Regional plc • Additional ad hoc Board meetings were held during the negotiations relating to the Ellandi and Capital & Regional acquisitions • An additional strategic session was held off site and included all ExCo members as well as the Board |
1 3 2 |
| Finance and financing |
• The Chief Financial Officer has presented a financial report at each Board meeting • Approval of the Annual Report and interim report and associated financial statements • Presentation and discussion on the draft budget and business plan • Approval of the annual budget • The CFO provided quarterly reporting against the treasury policy |
1 3 2 |
| Audit and risk | • The Chair of the Audit Committee reported to the Board on the proceedings of each Audit Committee meeting and meetings with valuers • The Board considers the risk register and internal controls at least twice a year • Update to the Board on the whistleblowing procedures • Recommendation to the Board on the re-appointment of the External Auditor |
1 3 2 |
| Operational and investor relations |
• The CEO presented a report at each Board meeting which also included updates on investor relations • Members of the ExCo were regularly invited to attend the Board meetings to present on various projects • The Board received IR strategy and quarterly corporate communication progress reports • Members of the senior leadership team were invited to Board meetings to report on specific assets |
1 3 2 |
| Stakeholders | • Stakeholders including our team, communities, shareholders, capital partners, occupiers, lenders, environment and local authorities are regularly considered as part of the CEO report to the Board • The Non-Executive Directors visited a number of the Group's assets during FY24 and FY25 and were provided with guided tours from the asset management teams responsible for the assets • HR reports are either tabled separately or included the CEO's report • The Board received updates from Alastair Miller's attendance at staff sessions |
1 3 2 |
| Environmental and governance |
• The Board received regular updates on ESG progress in the CEO's report and a quarterly ESG update from the Head of Asset Management and ESG • The Committee Chairs reported on key matters discussed at the Board Committees • The Company Secretary reported on key governance developments and on work carried out to update and review the Group's governance policies and procedures • The Board updated the Board's Schedule of Matters and reviewed and updated the Terms of Reference of the Board Committees in preparation for the new Corporate Governance Code |
1 3 2 |
Key

Responsible for leading the Group, establishing the Company purpose and values and setting the strategy and monitoring its progress. It also sets policies and monitors performance.
Reviews and monitors the Group's risk management processes.
Monitors the integrity of the half-year and annual financial statements before submission to the Board.
Monitors the effectiveness of the audit process.
Implements the Remuneration Policy of the Group, which is to ensure that Directors and senior management are rewarded in a way that attracts, retains and motivates them and aligns the interests of both shareholders and management.
Reviews the succession planning requirements of the Group and operates a formal, rigorous and transparent procedure for the appointment of new Directors to the Board.
Assists the Chief Executive with the development and implementation of the Group strategy, the management of the business and the discharge of its responsibilities delegated by the Board.
Senior members of the business below ExCo level tasked with assisting ExCo with the progress of the Group strategy.
Led by Emma Mackenzie, Head of Asset Management and ESG, the ESG Committee ensures the appropriate resources are mobilised so the key ESG programme milestones are achieved.
Originally set up during lockdown restrictions to focus on staff wellbeing, the Committee has evolved its brief to provide a collective employee voice and to focus on diversity and inclusion.
| NewRiver REIT plc Annual Report and Accounts 2025 | Strategic Report | Governance Report | Financial Statements | ESG Data Sets & Appendix |
Glossary & Company Information |
122 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
There is a clear division of responsibilities between the Chair, CEO and other members of the Board, as follows:
Division of responsibilities continued
| Role | Responsibilities | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chair | Lynn's role is to lead the Board and ensure that it operates effectively. | |||
| Lynn Fordham | Her responsibilities include: | |||
| • chairing the Board and general meetings of the Company and the Nomination Committee; • setting clear expectations concerning the Company's culture, values and behaviour; • ensuring effective engagement with shareholders, the workforce, customers and other key stakeholders and ensuring that the Board listens to their views; • setting the agenda, style and tone of Board meetings to ensure that all matters are given due consideration; • maintaining a culture of mutual respect, openness, debate and constructive challenge in the Board room; • ensuring the Board's effectiveness and that it receives timely, accurate and clear information; • ensuring each new Director receives a full, formal and tailored induction on joining the Board; • reviewing and agreeing training and development for the Board; and • ensuring that the performances of the Board, its Committees and individual Directors are evaluated once a year and acting on the results of the evaluation. |
||||
| Chief Executive Officer | Allan's responsibilities include: | |||
| Allan Lockhart | • managing the business of the Group; • recommending the Group's strategy to the Board; • ESG strategy; • implementing the strategy agreed by the Board; and • management of the Group's property portfolio, including developments. |
|||
| Chief Financial Officer | Will's responsibilities include: | |||
| Will Hobman | • implementing the Group's financial strategy, including balance sheet capitalisation; • overseeing financial reporting and internal controls; and • supporting the CEO in the delivery of the Group's strategy and financial performance. |
|||
| Senior Independent Non-Executive | Alastair's responsibilities include: | |||
| Director and Non-Executive Director Responsible for Workforce Engagement Alastair Miller |
• acting as a sounding board for the Chair; • evaluating the Chair's performance as part of the Board's evaluation process; • serving as an intermediary for the other Directors when necessary; • being available to shareholders should an occasion occur when there was a need to convey concern to the Board other than through the Chair or the Chief Executive; and • ensuring that the Board successfully engages with our workforce. |
|||
| Independent Non-Executive Directors |
Non-Executive Directors Alastair Miller, Charlie Parker, Colin Rutherford and Karen Miller bring independent judgement, knowledge and varied commercial experience to the meetings and in their oversight of the Group's strategy. Alastair and Colin chair the Remuneration and Audit Committees respectively. |
Strategic Report
& Appendix
Glossary & Company Information
Division of responsibilities continued
The Company Secretary keeps a register of all Directors' interests. The register sets out details of situations where each Director's interest may conflict with those of the Company (situational conflicts). The register is considered and reviewed at each Board meeting so that the Board may consider and authorise any new situational conflicts identified. At the beginning of each Board meeting, the Chair reminds the Directors of their duties under sections 175, 177 and 182 of the Companies Act 2006 which relate to the disclosure of any conflicts of interest prior to any matter that may be discussed by the Board.
Directors have the right to raise concerns at Board meetings and can ask for those concerns to be recorded in the Board minutes. The Group has also established a procedure which enables Directors, in relevant circumstances, to obtain independent professional advice at the Company's expense.
All Directors pre-clear any proposed appointments to listed company boards with the Board prior to committing to them.
The Non-Executive Directors are required, by their letters of appointment, to devote as much of their time, attention, ability and skills as are reasonably required for the performance of their duties. This is anticipated as a minimum of one day a month, and for the Chair, a minimum of two to three days. The Nomination Committee annually reviews the time commitments to ensure that all Board members continue to be able to devote sufficient time and attention to the Company's business.
Whilst a number of the Board have other non-executive directorships and commitments, the Nomination Committee remains satisfied that all of the Directors spend considerably more than this amount of time on Board and Committee activity. This has been especially evident during a year in which there have been two acquisitions necessitating additional Board meetings and calls.
The other listed company directorships of the NewRiver REIT plc Directors are set out on pages 115 to 116. The Board and Committee attendance record of each of the Directors during FY25 is set out on page 124 of this report.
The Board comprises four Independent Non-Executive Directors (excluding the Chair) and two Executive Directors. The Nomination Committee is of the opinion that the Non-Executive Directors remain independent, in line with the definition set out in the Code and are free from any relationship or circumstances that could affect, or appear to affect, their independent judgement. The Chair was independent on appointment and the Board still considers her to be independent. All Directors are subject to re-election at the AGM each year.
All Directors have access to the advice and services of the Company Secretary. The appointment of the Company Secretary is a matter for the Board.
The purpose of ExCo is to assist the CEO in the performance of his duties within the bands of the Committee's authority, including:

Composition, succession and evaluation
The Chair, Company Secretary and Chief Operating and People Officer manage an induction process to ensure that new Directors are fully briefed about the Company and its operations. The process usually includes asset visits and meetings with members of the senior management team and other staff, as well as specific briefings with regard to their legal and regulatory obligations as a Director.
The AGM is the annual opportunity for all shareholders to meet with the Directors and to discuss with them the Company's business and strategy. Shareholders are therefore welcome to attend in person at the 2025 AGM and we provide a facility for shareholders to submit questions ahead of the AGM via email. The 2025 AGM is planned to be held on 31 July 2025.
The notice of AGM is posted to all shareholders at least 20 working days before the meeting. Separate resolutions are proposed on all substantive issues and voting is conducted by a poll. The Board believes this method of voting is more democratic than voting via a show of hands since all shares voted at the meeting, including proxy votes submitted in advance of the meeting, are counted. In line with our sustainability commitment, we do not issue hard copy forms of proxy in the post. Instead, we ask shareholders to appoint a proxy online via the Registrar's portal.
For each resolution, shareholders will have the opportunity to vote for or against or to withhold their vote. Following the meeting, the results of votes lodged are announced to the London Stock Exchange and displayed on the Company's website.
We are committed to the highest legal and ethical standards in every aspect of our business. It is our policy to conduct business in a fair, honest and open way, without the use of bribery or corrupt practices to obtain an unfair advantage. We provide clear guidance for suppliers and employees, including policies on anti-corruption and anti-bribery, anti-fraud and a Code of Conduct. All employees have received updates and training on these issues during the year.
Being mindful of human rights, the Company has a Modern Slavery Policy to ensure that all of its suppliers are acting responsibly and are aware of the risks of slavery, human trafficking and child labour within their own organisation and supply chain. The Modern Slavery Statement is updated and published each year. All suppliers are required to agree to our Modern Slavery Policy requirements before being accepted as suppliers to the business.
Strategic Report
Each of the Directors has committed to attend all scheduled Board and relevant Committee meetings and has also committed to make every effort to attend ad hoc meetings, either in person or by telephone/video call. During the Capital & Regional transaction there were a significant number of ad-hoc Board meetings and calls. All members of the Board made themselves available, often at short notice and out of hours. Board papers are circulated to Directors in advance of the scheduled meetings via an electronic board portal. This allows for an efficient and secure circulation of Board papers; if a Director cannot attend a meeting, he or she is able to consider the papers in advance of the meeting as usual and will have the opportunity to discuss them with the Chair or Chief Executive and to provide comments. The Non-Executive Directors meet without the Executive Directors and the Chair present at least once a year.
& Appendix
Glossary & Company Information
Attendance at regular scheduled Board meetings and the Board Committees is shown below:
| Board members | Board attendance |
Audit Committee attendance |
Remuneration Committee attendance |
Nomination Committee attendance |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lynn Fordham: Chair | 9/9 | – | – | 3/3 |
| Margaret Ford1 : Chair |
1/1 | – | 0/1 | 1/1 |
| Executive Directors | ||||
| Allan Lockhart | 9/9 | – | – | – |
| Will Hobman | 9/9 | – | – | – |
| Non-Executive Directors |
||||
| Alastair Miller | 9/9 | 4/5 | 4/4 | 4/4 |
| Charlie Parker | 9/9 | 4/5 | 4/4 | 3/4 |
| Colin Rutherford | 9/9 | 5/5 | 4/4 | 4/4 |
| Dr Karen Miller | 9/9 | 5/5 | 4/4 | 4/4 |
| NewRiver REIT plc Annual Report and Accounts 2025 | Strategic Report | Governance Report | Financial Statements | ESG Data Sets | Glossary & | 125 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
In order to evaluate its own effectiveness, the Board undertakes annual effectiveness reviews using a combination of externally facilitated and internally run evaluations usually over a three-year cycle.
Although the Company is not part of the FTSE 350 and therefore not required to carry out external evaluations every three years, the Company generally does use an external evaluator at least once every three years. In FY24, however, due to the search for a new Chair, it was agreed that internal questionnaires would be used again with a view to carrying out a full external Board effectiveness assessment in FY25 when the new Chair was onboarded and had been in post for a number of months.
Accordingly, during FY24 internally facilitated questionnaires were distributed and completed by the Directors on an anonymous basis. All Directors completed the questionnaires and there were high levels of satisfaction in most of the key areas of Board activity.
The following recommendations were made:
| Recommendations | Progress | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| • • • |
There was scope for engaging further with the senior management and inviting them to some further Board meetings There was scope for improving the Board's understanding of the succession plans for the senior management team and the talent pipeline below senior management The Board and senior management succession planning remains |
• The Board has initiated a practice whereby each ExCo member attends the Board meetings to report on their area of responsibility rather than the CEO • The strategy session spent time looking at succession planning with the wider NewRiver team especially in light of the Capital & Regional integration |
|||
| • | a key focus and a potential opportunity to address diversity There was scope for further Board engagement with the wider NewRiver team |
• The Board and Nomination Committee have focused on succession planning this year with the changes due for the SID • Additional social events have been held and are being planned for the wider NewRiver team to aid the integration of Ellandi and Capital & Regional |
During FY25, an externally facilitated Board review was conducted by No 4, an independent Board Review advisory business. This involved interviewing all the Directors on a confidential basis. There were high levels of satisfaction and confidence in most of the key areas of Board activity. The following observations and recommendations were made:
Company Information

I am pleased to present the Nomination Committee Report for 2025. Monitoring the balance of skills on the Board to match our strategy and succession planning continued to be the key focus for the Committee this year.
During FY26 Alastair Miller will reach his nine-year term so much of the focus for the Committee for FY25 has been planning the search for a new Non-Executive Director and assessing what skills and experience our strategic plans and the Board balance needs. We intend for Alastair to stay on the Board beyond his nine-year term to ensure an orderly handover of his roles as he is the Senior Independent Non-Executive Director, Remuneration Committee Chair and the Director responsible for employee engagement. We therefore intend to appoint a new Non-Executive Director prior to Alastair leaving. During this year we have focussed on the Board skills matrix and we have appointed SA Associates, an independent boutique search agency, to assist in our search for a Non-Executive Director.
The Committee's focus for FY26 will be this succession planning and our diversity priorities.
Lynn Fordham Chair
16 June 2025
The role of the Committee is to lead the process for appointments, to ensure plans are in place for orderly succession to both the Board and senior management positions and to review the annual Board Evaluation process.
Our Committee consists of four Independent Non-Executive Directors and the Chair of the Board.
Biographies are available on pages 115 and 116.
Strategic Report
The attendance at meetings by the members of the Committee are set out in the table on page 124.
& Appendix
Nomination Committee Report continued
The Committee considers succession planning a key element of its remit. It recognises the importance of creating robust succession plans for both the Board and executive management so that they can fulfil the Company's long-term strategy.
The Committee acknowledges that succession plans should be regularly reviewed to enable employees and Board members to maintain the skills and experience necessary to ensure the continuing success and good governance of the Company.
Having appointed a new Chair at the end of FY24 the need to focus on succession planning continued in FY25 with the requirement to embark on plans to replace a long-standing Non-Executive Director who is not only the Remuneration Committee Chair but also the Senior Independent Non-Executive Director and the Non-Executive Director responsible for staff engagement. To commence the process, the skills matrix has been reviewed so that we could understand the skills any replacement Non-Executive Director needs to possess. This skills matrix was then assessed against our future strategy and a role description was formulated. The next stage was to appoint a suitable executive search consultant to ensure the identification of suitable and exceptional candidates. SA Associates, an independent boutique search agency, has been appointed to assist with the search for a new Non-Executive Director.

Glossary &


Key
During the year, the Committee reviewed the balance of skills on the Board to ensure that they match the Company's strategy and to understand what additional skills may be required.
| Board skills matrix | Executive Directors |
Chair | Non-Executive Directors | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Allan Lockhart |
Will Hobman |
Lynn Fordham |
Alastair Miller |
Dr Karen Miller |
Charlie Parker |
Colin Rutherford |
|
| Property asset management | • | • | • | • | |||
| Regeneration and development | • | • | • | • | • | ||
| Financial and banking | • | • | • | • | • | ||
| Capital markets | • | • | • | • | • | ||
| Environmental | • | • | • | • | |||
| Social and Governance | • | • | • | • | • | • | • |
| Capital allocation and cost efficiency | • | • | • | • | • | • | |
| Capital partnerships | • | • | • | • | |||
| Commercial leadership | • | • | • | • | • | • | |
| Mergers and acquisitions | • | • | • | • | |||
| Public sector partnerships | • | • | • | ||||
| Workforce well-being | • | • | • | • | • | • |
The Nomination Committee is of the opinion that the Non-Executive Directors remain independent, in line with the definition set out in the 2018 Code and are free from any relationship or circumstances that could affect, or appear to affect, their independent judgement. The Chair was independent on appointment. The balance of Directors (excluding the Chair) is two Executive Directors and four independent Non-Executive Directors. The Committee regularly reviews the time commitments of the Non-Executive Directors and none are considered by the Committee to be overboarded.
As a Company, we are committed to a culture of diversity and inclusion in which everyone is given equal opportunities to progress regardless of gender, race, ethnic origin, nationality, age, religion, sexual orientation or disability. When recruiting, the Company has always considered all aspects of diversity. The Company is very mindful of the need to strive to create as diverse a Company as possible, and to create as many opportunities as possible for nurturing emerging female talent.
The Company always ensures there is a selection of candidates who have a good balance of skills, knowledge and experience. The Committee places particular value on experience of operating in a listed company, experience of the real estate and retail sectors, and financial or real estate training. The Company aims to recruit the best candidates on the basis of their merit and ability.
The Board Diversity Policy is set out below and sets out the approach to diversity on the Board. Its purpose is to ensure an inclusive and diverse membership of the Board and its Committees, resulting in optimal decision-making and assisting in the development of a strategy which promotes the success of the Company for the benefit of its members as a whole, having regard to the interests of other stakeholders. The Policy applies to the Board and Board Committees, but sits alongside the Group's Equal Opportunities Policy, and other associated Group policies that set out our broader commitment to diversity and inclusion.
The Board acknowledges the benefits of greater diversity, including gender diversity and remains committed to ensuring that the Company's Directors bring a wide range of skills, knowledge, experience, backgrounds and perspectives. The Board supports the recommendations of the Davies Review (Women on Boards), the Hampton-Alexander Review and the Parker Review and continues to consider the recommendations when contemplating future appointments to the Board.
The Board aspires to maintain a balance such that:
Diversity (including gender and ethnicity) will be taken into consideration when evaluating the skills, knowledge and experience desirable to strengthen the Board and when making appointments. The Board supports and monitors management's actions to increase the proportion of senior leadership roles held by women, people from ethnic minority backgrounds and other under-represented groups across the Company in support of the Hampton-Alexander Review and Parker Review recommendations.
Nomination Committee Report continued

Board

Female Male Direct Reports of Executive Committee Executive Committee

Male
Executive Committee

Female Group
Male
Female
Male
Key

| Female | Male | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Board | 2 | 29% | 5 | 71% |
| Executive Committee | 2 | 29% | 5 | 71% |
| Direct Reports of Executive Committee | 20 | 54% | 17 | 46% |
| Group | 41 | 50% | 41 | 50% |

| NewRiver REIT plc Annual Report and Accounts 2025 |
|---|
| NewRiver REIT plc Annual Report and Accounts 2025 | Strategic Report | Governance Report | Financial Statements | ESG Data Sets & Appendix |
Glossary & Company Information |
130 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Number of Board
Percentage of
Number of senior positions on the Board (CEO, CFO, SID,
Number in executive Percentage of executive
Nomination Committee Report continued
| Board Diversity Data | ||
|---|---|---|
| -- | ---------------------- | -- |
As at 31 March 2025 the Company had not met all of the targets of the Listing Rules diversity and inclusion guidelines as follows:
| inclusion guidelines as follows: | members | the Board | Chair) | management | management | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Listing rule requirement | Detail | Men | 5 | 71% | 3 | 5 | 71% | ||
| Women | 2 | 29% | 1 | 2 | 29% | ||||
| At least 40% of the board are women | The Board comprises two female Directors and five male Directors, equivalent to 29% female representation. The Board's policy is to ensure |
Not specified/prefer not to say |
– | – | – | – | – | ||
| that at least two members of the Board are female and that the Board has a long-term aspiration to achieve no less than 40% female representation |
Number of Board members |
Percentage of the Board |
Number of senior positions on the Board (CEO, CFO, SID, Chair) |
Number in executive management |
Percentage of executive management |
||||
| on the Board. As the Board has only seven Directors, Board vacancies are not frequent. The most recent Board appointment, made in March 2024, was female but this has not increased the |
White British or other White (including minority/ white groups) |
7 | 100% | 4 | 7 | 100% | |||
| female representation as the incoming female replaced an exiting female. |
Mixed/Multiple ethnic groups Asian/Asian British |
– | – | – | – | – | |||
| At least one of the senior board positions (Chair, Chief Executive Officer (CEO), Senior Independent Director (SID) or Chief Financial Officer (CFO)) is a woman. |
The Chair of the Board is female. | Black/African/Caribbean/ Black British |
– | – | – | – | |||
| Other ethnic group, including Arab |
|||||||||
| At least one member of the board is from a minority ethnic background (which is |
There are currently no Board members that are from a non-white ethnic background. As is the |
Not specified/prefer not to say |
– | – | – | – | – | ||
| defined by reference to categories recommended by the Office for National Statistics (ONS)) excluding those listed, by the ONS, as coming from a white ethnic background. |
case with female representation, with a small Board with a low turnover of Directors, the targets set by the Listing Rules will take time to achieve. The Board aspires that in longer term, at least one Director will be from a non-white ethnic minority background. |
The information in this table was sourced directly from the individuals concerned. Members of the Board were provided with the prescribed disclosure categories and asked to complete them based on their self-identification. |
– |

I am pleased to present the Audit Committee Report for 2025. The Report provides an outline of the activities carried out by the Committee in accordance with its Terms of Reference as it supports the Board and the Company's governance structure and activities.
In addition to the Committee's regular programme of work, an area of focus of the Committee for the year was monitoring the transition of Forvis Mazars as the group's new external auditor. With the FRC Corporate Governance Code updated in 2024 and due to apply to the Company in FY26, the Committee reviewed its terms of reference during the year to ensure that they aligned with the new Code and applied best practice in governance. A copy of these terms of reference is available on our website at www.nrr.co. uk The Committee has received an update on the new requirements under the Code and will now focus on how it can implement these changes over the coming year.
Our regular programme of meetings and discussions, supported by our interactions with the Company's management, external auditors and property valuers and the quality of the reports and information provided to us, enable the Committee members to effectively discharge our duties and responsibilities.
Colin Rutherford Audit Committee Chair
16 June 2025
The role of the Committee is to assist the Board in fulfilling its oversight responsibilities by reviewing the integrity of financial and narrative statements and other financial information provided to shareholders. By also monitoring the company's risk management and internal control framework and its processes for compliance with laws, regulations, ethical codes of practice, the UK Corporate Governance Code, FRC guidance and the FRC Audit Committees and the External Audit Minimum Standard.
Our Committee consists of four Independent Non-Executive Directors.
Biographies are available on pages 115 and 116
The attendance at meetings by the members of the Committee is set out in the table on page 124.
• Discussing any issues arising from the half-year review and year-end audit of the Group
Glossary & Company Information
& Appendix
Strategic Report
Audit Committee Report continued
& Appendix
• Meeting with the Property Valuers
• Meeting with the Property Valuers
The Committee has primary responsibility for managing the relationship with the external auditors, including assessing their performance, effectiveness and independence annually and recommending to the Board their reappointment or removal.
Forvis Mazars LLP (Forvis Mazars) were appointed as the Group's external auditors in 2024. The Committee keeps under review the need for future tenders in accordance with current regulations and subject to the annual assessment of the auditor's effectiveness and independence. Nargis Yunis has been the Forvis Mazars lead audit partner since their appointment in August 2024.
During the year, the members of the Committee have met twice with representatives from Forvis Mazars without management present, to ensure that there are no issues in the relationship between management and the external auditors which it should address. There were none.
The Committee considers the nature, scope and results of the external auditors' work and reviews, develops and implements a policy on the supply of any non-audit services that are to be provided by the external auditors. It receives and reviews reports from the Group's external auditors relating to the Group's Annual Report and Accounts and the external audit process.
In respect of the audit for the financial year ended 31 March 2025, Forvis Mazars presented their Audit plan (prepared in consultation with management) to the Committee. The Audit plan included an assessment of audit risks, audit scope, independence, the terms of engagement, fees and robust testing
procedures. The Committee approved the implementation of the plan following discussions with both Forvis Mazars and management.
Audit fees for the financial year ended 31 March 2025 were £1.0m. These fees include £0.5m paid by Capital & Regional plc pre-acquisition. The Company has a non-audit services policy in place which limits Forvis Mazars to working on the audit or such other matters where their expertise as the Company's auditor makes them the logical choice for the work. This is to preserve their independence and objectivity. The Company paid £0.1m in non-audit fees to Forvis Mazars for the financial year ended 31 March 2025. The non-audit fees relate solely to Forvis Mazars' review of the interim results for the six months to 30 September 2024.
The Chair of the Committee speaks regularly to the external audit partner to ascertain if there are any concerns, to discuss the audit reports and to ensure that the external auditors have received the support and information requested from management.
In accordance with the guidance set out in the Financial Reporting Council's 'Practice aid for audit committees', the assessment of the external audit has not been a separate compliance exercise, or an annual one-off exercise, but rather it has formed an integral part of the Committee's activities. This has allowed the Audit Committee to form its own view on audit quality and on the effectiveness of the external audit process, based on the evidence it has obtained throughout the year.
Audit Committee Report continued
| By referring to the FRC's Practice aid on audit quality |
The Committee has looked to this practice aid for guidance and has ensured that assessment of the external audit is a continuing and integral part of the Committee's activities. |
|---|---|
| Observations of, and interactions with, the external auditors |
The Committee has met with the external audit partner without management at least twice during the year and has noted that Forvis Mazars were performing well and the working relationship was good. |
| The audit plan, the audit findings and the external auditors' report |
The Committee scrutinises these documents and reviews them carefully at meetings and by doing so has been able to assess the external auditors' ability to explain in clear terms what work they performed in key areas and also assess whether the description used is consistent with what they communicated to the Committee at the audit planning stage. The Committee has also regularly challenged these reports in the meetings. |
| Input from those subject to the external audit. |
The Committee has requested the insights from the Chief Financial Officer and the Finance team during the external audit process. |
Having regard to these matters the Committee has considered the effectiveness of the external audit process and feels that the external auditors demonstrated professional scepticism and challenged management's assumptions where necessary.
The Committee reviewed the external reporting of the Group including the interim review, and the Annual Report. In assessing the Annual Report, the Committee considered the key judgements and estimates. The significant issues considered by the Committee in respect of the year ended 31 March 2025, which contained a significant degree of estimation uncertainty, is set out in the following table.
Strategic Report
Changes in key estimates can have a significant impact on the valuation of properties. The Group has a property portfolio recognised on its Consolidated Balance Sheet valued by external valuers at £887.5 million at 31 March 2025 (excluding RoU assets).
Acquisition of Capital and
On 10 December 2024, the Group acquired the entire issued ordinary share capital of Capital & Regional plc. Where there were judgemental areas, such as in relation to the accounting for Capital & Regional plc acquisition, the Committee specifically reviewed the proposed treatments and ensured that the Annual report and accounts provided appropriate disclosures.
Regional plc
The Committee and management met with Colliers, Knight Frank and Kroll (the Group's external valuers) on several occasions to discuss the valuation of the assets and understand the process that was followed, the key estimates used and to ensure a robust and independent valuation had taken place.
The meetings were productive and management and the Committee have confirmed that they continue to adopt the valuations as being the fair valuation of the properties as at the reporting date.
In addition, the external auditors performed additional audit procedures over the valuer judgements and estimates, and presented challenges to the valuers, which were reported to and discussed with the Committee.
The Audit Committee has reviewed the assumptions underlying the accounting for the transaction, discussed these with Management and concluded that the treatment as an asset acquisition during the year is appropriate.
In addition, the external auditors have performed audit procedures over the treatment of the Capital & Regional acquisition which were reported to and discussed with the Committee.
Further details on the Capital & Regional acquisition are disclosed in Note 17 of the Group financial statements.
Audit Committee Report continued
The Board oversees the Group's risk management and internal controls and determines the Group's risk appetite. The Board has, however, delegated responsibility for review of the risk management methodology and the effectiveness of internal controls to the Audit Committee.
The Group's system of internal controls includes financial, operational and compliance controls and risk management. Policies and procedures, including clearly defined levels of delegated authority, have been communicated throughout the Group. Internal controls have been implemented in respect of the key operational and financial processes of the business. These policies are designed to ensure the accuracy and reliability of financial reporting and govern the preparation of the Financial Statements. During the year, as part of the C&R acquisition, there has been a review of the Group's internal controls to create the Financial Position and Prospects Procedure (FPPP) required for this size of transaction. This process has provided the Committee with additional comfort that the Group's system of internal controls remains fit for purpose and robust.
The Board is ultimately responsible for the Group's system of internal controls and risk management and discharges its duties in this area by:
The process by which the Audit Committee has monitored and reviewed the effectiveness of the system of internal controls and risk management during the year has included:
The effectiveness of the Company's risk management and internal control systems is reviewed annually and was last reviewed by the Committee in May 2025. The review concluded that:
The Committee is satisfied that the risk management framework is effective and did not identify any failing in the control systems.
Further details of the Company's risk management process, together with the principal risks, can be found in the Principal Risks and Uncertainties section.
The Group does not have an internal audit team. The need for this is reviewed annually by the Committee. Due to the relative lack of complexity and the outsourcing of the majority of the day-to-day operational functions, the Committee continues to be satisfied that there is no requirement for such an in-house team but will continue to keep this under review. The Committee does however look to third parties to provide an internal audit review function and commissions internal audit reviews on specific matters each year. During FY25 as part of the Capital & Regional acquisition, there has been a review of the Company's internal controls and structure to create the FPPP required for this class of transaction. The external consultant who assisted in pulling together the FPPP is assisting with the Capital & Regional integration project, which will include integrating NewRiver internal controls into the Capital & Regional processes.
The Committee conducts an annual review of the Group's Whistleblowing Policy to ensure it remains up to date and relevant and reports its findings to the Board. Training on whistleblowing is provided to staff annually to capture new staff and to remind existing staff of the procedures. The Committee provides feedback to the Board on the Whistleblowing Policy and procedures and effectiveness of the policy at least every six months. There have never been any concerns raised through the whistleblowing process or through any other process to the Committee.
The Committee receives a copy and reviews in detail the Gifts and Hospitality register on a regular basis.
Company Information
Audit Committee Report continued
The Company is not a constituent of the FTSE 350, however the Company confirms on a voluntary basis that it has complied with terms of The Statutory Audit Services for Large Companies Market Investigation (Mandatory User of Competitive Tender Processes and Audit Committee Responsibilities) Order 2014 (the "Order") throughout the year. In addition to requiring mandatory audit re-tendering at least every 10 years for FTSE 350 companies, the Order provides that only the Audit Committee, acting collectively or through its Chair, and for and on behalf of the Board, is permitted:
The Committee has reviewed the basis for the Company's viability statement that is drafted with reference to the financial forecasts for the next three years. This period of assessment is aligned to performance measurement and management remuneration and, in the opinion of the Committee, this period of assessment strikes the optimal balance between allowing the impact of strategic decisions to be
modelled while maintaining the accuracy of underlying forecast inputs. The Committee places additional scrutiny on the assumptions used in the forecasts to ensure they are appropriate. The Committee provides advice to the Board on the viability statement.
The Committee ensured sufficient review was undertaken of the adequacy of the financial arrangements, cash flow forecasts and lender covenant compliance. The Committee further tested the Group's performance against its stated strategy and its future plans. Accordingly, the Committee recommended to the Board that the statement be approved.
The Committee further focused on the appropriateness of adopting the going concern basis in preparing the Group's financial statements for the year ended 31 March 2025 and satisfied itself that the going concern basis of presentation of the financial statements and the related disclosure is appropriate. The viability statement is set out on pages 109 to 110.
The Directors are required to confirm that they consider, taken as a whole, that the Annual Report is fair, balanced and understandable and that it provides the information necessary for shareholders to assess the Group's position and performance, business model and strategy.
To ensure this is the case the following process is in place:
A core experienced team is responsible for the co-ordination of Annual Report submissions, verification, review and consistency. The narrative sections are drafted by the members of the team with specific responsibility for each area, such as the Chair, the CEO, the CFO, ESG Strategy Lead, Director of Communications and the Company Secretary.
& Appendix
As narrative sections are prepared, they are circulated to Board and ExCo members to review and comment.
The draft Annual Report is given to other staff members not involved in the drafting process to read and provide feedback on its fairness, balance and understandability.
The Committee reviews the Annual Report on behalf of the Board, taking into account the comments made by the Board, reports from management and reports issued by the external auditor and makes recommendations to the Board.
The Committee satisfies itself that the controls over the accuracy and consistency of information presented in the Annual Report are robust and that the information is presented fairly (including the calculations and use of alternative performance measures). The Committee confirms to the Board that the processes and controls around the preparation of the Annual Report are appropriate, allowing the Board to make the "fair, balanced and understandable" statement in the Directors' Responsibilities Statement.

On behalf of the Board, I am pleased to present the Remuneration Committee Report for the financial year ended 31 March 2025. In this statement I have summarised the link between remuneration and performance and our decisions on remuneration for FY25.
FY25 has been a successful year for NewRiver. During FY25 we have re-shaped the business with the transformational acquisition of Capital & Regional, which has increased the portfolio size by 65% to £0.9bn through the combination of highquality, complementary assets with a similarly low-risk tenant profile and attractive income characteristics. We also acquired Ellandi, an asset and development management business focused on UK retail and regeneration, which provides our existing Capital Partnership business with additional scale, diversification, and skills, consistent with our strategy to deliver earnings growth in a capital-light way.
The benefits of the corporate transactions that we completed in the year, especially the Capital & Regional acquisition, are starting to flow through. Our portfolio has been performing well for some time, which is a reflection of the underlying strength of our retail occupiers, and, together with the benefits of our corporate activity means we are firmly on track to deliver sector leading earnings growth.
Our Remuneration Policy was approved by shareholders in July 2023 and implementation of this Policy during FY25 was as follows:
Base salaries for both of the Executive Directors were increased by 3% for FY25 in line with the increase for the wider workforce.
As noted in the 2024 Remuneration Report, the performance measures and targets for the FY25 annual bonus were not finalised at the time of publication due to uncertainty surrounding corporate activity during the year.
Following a review by the Committee, and in light of the M&A activity, the Committee concluded that it was appropriate to introduce additional metrics to support a smooth and efficient acquisition process, while continuing to prioritise financial performance. Accordingly, the weightings of the bonus metrics were rebalanced to reflect these changes.
As a result, the FY25 annual bonus was based on the Total Return vs IPD All Retail (25%), UFFO (25%), LTV (10%), Synergy Savings (15%), Value Add Capital Deployment (5%), Cost Effective Capital Raise (7.5%), Capital Partnerships (5%) and ESG measures (7.5%). Based on the strong corporate, financial and strategic performance over the period, the bonus out-turn was 82.90% of maximum. The Committee is comfortable that the formulaic bonus outcome appropriately reflects the wider business performance of the Company. 30% of the bonus will be deferred in shares for two years.
The FY23 LTIP Award will vest in July 2025 with performance assessed against relative TAR (50%) and relative Total Shareholder Return ('TSR') (50%) based on performance from 1 April 2022 to 31 March 2025. The TSR performance condition was achieved in full and, accordingly, the 50% element based on TSR will vest in full. Notwithstanding the strong performance over the period, the relative TAR element did not meet the minimum hurdle and therefore lapsed. As a result, the total vesting overall for this award is 50% of maximum. The Committee considered wider business performance over the three-year performance period and is comfortable that the formulaic vesting outcome is appropriate.
The Committee was comfortable that actions taken on pay during the year across the Company were appropriate and balanced the interests of all stakeholders, and that the Remuneration Policy operated as intended.
During FY25, we undertook a significant transformation of the business through the strategic acquisitions of Capital & Regional and Ellandi. In response to this reshaping of our operations and priorities, the Remuneration Committee has reviewed the Executive Remuneration framework for FY26 to ensure it remains closely aligned with our long-term business strategy and continues to drive sustained performance.
Following a consultation with shareholders and, with the goal of ensuring that our executive remuneration remains incentivising, motivational and competitive, we are proposing two changes:
Both changes are consistent with the parameters of our existing Remuneration Policy, and shareholders expressed their support for these proposals which serve as a retention mechanism for our Executives. Further details regarding the changes are set out below.
The current policy (and plan rules) permit us to grant an award worth up to 200% of an Executive Director's salary per annum. Since 2016 we have operated the policy at a lower level, of 100% of salary, and as part of the policy approval at the 2023 AGM we stated that we would engage with our shareholders if the grant level was increased above 100% of salary.
For FY26, we are increasing the grant level to 150% of salary for both Executive Directors, for the following reasons:
Other than the changes noted above, the implementation of the Remuneration Policy will remain consistent with FY25, and the performance conditions for the incentives will also align with those set for FY25. As part of the policy review to be conducted in FY26, the Committee will evaluate the performance conditions for FY27 incentives to ensure they remain aligned with the evolving strategy, particularly in light of recent M&A activity.
During the year the Committee has reviewed the salary increases for the wider workforce and the Executive Directors. As a result, both the wider workforce and the Executive Directors received a 3% increase in base salary.
Alignment of pension contributions with the wider workforce.
During the year, the Committee oversaw the reward and compensation packages across the Company. As part of this work, we reviewed workforce pension contributions and, as a result, increased the contribution rate for the wider workforce from 4% to 5% for FY26. This 1% increase will also apply to the Executive Directors' pension contribution, in line with the Remuneration Policy.
Executive Directors will have the opportunity to earn a bonus up to a normal maximum of 125% of salary. In line with the FY25 annual bonus, the bonus will be based on financial and corporate measures and personal strategic performance. 30% of any bonus paid will be deferred into shares for two years.
The Executive Directors will receive an LTIP grant of 150% of salary. In line with the FY25 LTIP grants, performance will be assessed against relative TSR (60%) and relative TAR (40%). We will review the performance measures for the LTIP as part of the policy review and ahead of grants in FY27. Awards must be held by Executive Directors for a further two years after vesting.
Our existing Performance Share Plan (PSP) and Deferred Bonus Plan rules have a 10-year life and will expire soon. Accordingly, we will be seeking shareholder approval at the 2025 AGM for a new LTIP which will be used to grant deferred share bonus awards as well as performance shares. The LTIP will be very similar to the existing PSP, with the following key changes:
Ahead of the AGM, we have engaged with 12 of our largest investors as well as Institutional Shareholder Services (ISS), the Investment Association (IA) and Glass Lewis, to understand their views on our proposed changes to the implementation of the Policy in FY26 and the new LTIP plan rules. Both our investors and the proxy agencies were supportive of the changes.
I am the designated Non-Executive Director who has the responsibility of ensuring that the Board successfully engages with the workforce. As a result of being a small team there is naturally proximity between the Board and the workforce which makes it easier for the Board to engage with staff directly. I attend staff forums to ensure that there is an opportunity for staff to raise questions or concerns directly with myself. An element of staff targets mirrors Executive Director targets. We also use our appraisal process to explain and discuss with employees how the policy for Executive Directors aligns with the pay and conditions of the workforce. The operation of the Remuneration Policy was not raised as a material issue during the year. Therefore, no amendments were required to proposed implementation as a result of this engagement.
We believe that the operation of our Remuneration Policy recognises the experience of shareholders, employees and other stakeholders.
We welcome feedback and if shareholders have any questions about remuneration generally, or the contents of the report, I can be contacted through our investor relations email at [email protected].
My fellow Directors and I intend to attend the AGM and we would be pleased to answer any questions you may have about the Committee's work.
Alastair Miller Committee Chair
16 June 2025
| NewRiver REIT plc Annual Report and Accounts 2025 | Strategic Report | Governance Report | Financial Statements | ESG Data Sets & Appendix |
Glossary & Company Information |
138 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|

| Implementation of Policy in FY26 | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Base Salaries | Allan Lockhart: £513,582 | ||||
| Will Hobman: £355,136 | |||||
| Benefits | No change | ||||
| Pension | Allan Lockhart: 5% of salary | ||||
| Will Hobman: 5% of salary | |||||
| Annual Bonus | Maximum opportunity is 125% of salary | ||||
| Performance conditions: | |||||
| Corporate and financial measures and strategic measures | |||||
| 30% deferred into shares for two years | |||||
| Long-Term | Grant levels at 150% of salary | ||||
| Incentive Plan | Performance conditions: | ||||
| Relative TSR (60%) Relative TAR (40%) | |||||
| Two-year post-vesting holding period applies | |||||
| Shareholding requirements |
200% of salary |


XX

| NewRiver REIT plc Annual Report and Accounts 2025 | Strategic Report | Governance Report | Financial Statements | ESG Data Sets & Appendix |
Glossary & Company Information |
139 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
The Remuneration Policy was approved by shareholders at the 2023 Annual General Meeting on 26 July 2023. The full Remuneration Policy can be found in the 2023 Annual Report which is available at www.nrr.co.uk.
| Element | Purpose and Link to Strategy | Operation | Maximum | Performance Target |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fixed | |||||
| Salary | Market competitive remuneration base reflecting role, responsibilities, skills and experience. |
Normally reviewed annually, effective 1 April, although salaries may be reviewed more frequently or at different times of the year if the Committee determines this is appropriate. Salaries are set taking into account the performance of the individual, the responsibilities and size of the role, salary increases across the Group and market data for peer companies. |
There is no prescribed maximum. Increases will typically be dependent on the results of an annual review in the context of the average increase for the wider work force, inflation and market data. |
Not applicable. | |
| Paid in cash monthly. | Increases will not normally be above the level implemented across the wider workforce. Increases may be above this level, for example if there is an increase in the scale, scope or responsibility of the role. |
||||
| Pension | To provide competitive post retirement benefits. To assist with recruitment and |
The Executive Directors may participate in the Company's defined contribution plan or receive a cash supplement in lieu of pension contributions. |
A pension contribution is payable in line with the pension available to the workforce, currently 5% of salary. |
Not applicable. | |
| retention. | |||||
| Benefits | To provide a competitive and cost-effective benefits package. |
The Company provides a range of non-pensionable benefits to Executive Directors which may include medical insurance, life |
Benefits are set at a level which the Committee considers appropriate when |
Not applicable. | |
| To assist with recruitment and retention. |
assurance, permanent health insurance, holiday and sick pay. Other benefits such as relocation allowances may be offered if |
compared to the Company's listed real estate investment trusts peers. |
|||
| considered appropriate and reasonable by the Committee. | There is no prescribed maximum. | ||||
| Variable | |||||
| Bonus | To incentivise performance in the reporting year. Targets are consistent with the Group's long-term strategy. The deferral of a proportion of the bonus in shares aligns Directors' |
All measures and targets will be reviewed and set annually by the Committee at the beginning of the financial year and levels of award are determined by the Committee after the year end based on achievement of performance against the stipulated measures and targets. |
The maximum bonus is 125% of salary. On-target performance would result in a bonus payment of 50% of maximum bonus. Threshold performance would result in bonus payment of up to 25% of |
All measures and targets normally relate to a financial year of the Company and are reviewed on an annual basis. |
|
| interests with those of shareholders and to discourage short-term decision making. |
The Committee retains an overriding discretion to adjust pay-outs from formulaic performance condition outcomes to ensure that |
maximum bonus. | |||
| overall bonus payments reflect its view of corporate performance during the year and are fair to both shareholders and participants. |
At least 50% of the bonus will be subject |
||||
| 30% of the bonus must be deferred into shares for two years. Vesting of the deferred shares will be subject to continued employment. |
to financial performance conditions. |
||||
| The value of the bonus does not contribute to the pensionable salary. Clawback and malus provisions apply. |
| NewRiver REIT plc Annual Report and Accounts 2025 | Strategic Report | Governance Report | Financial Statements | ESG Data Sets & Appendix |
Glossary & Company Information |
140 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
at cessation for two years. The Committee
requirement in exceptional circumstances (e.g. serious ill-health). Shares that have been purchased voluntarily may be excluded from the post-cessation shareholding requirement.
has the discretion to relax this
| Element | Purpose and Link to Strategy | Operation | Maximum | Performance Target |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Variable | ||||
| Performance Share Plan |
To incentivise and reward the delivery of returns to shareholders and sustained long-term performance. Aligns the Executive Directors' interests with those of shareholders. Rewards and helps retain/recruit executives. |
Discretionary grant of nil-cost options or conditional awards of shares. Awards normally vest three years from the date of award. Vesting of awards is subject to satisfaction of performance targets normally measured over a three-year period. The Committee retains an overriding discretion to adjust the vesting level from formulaic performance condition outcomes to ensure that the overall level of vesting reflects its view of corporate performance over the performance period and is fair to both shareholders and participants. A holding period of two years will apply following vesting before participants are entitled to sell their shares. Clawback and malus provisions apply as described in the notes to this table. |
The maximum award level permitted under the 2016 PSP plan rules and this Policy is 200% of salary. As summarised in the Chair's statement on page 136, following a review of quantum by the Committee and in consultation with our investors, the Executive will be granted an LTIP award of 150% of salary for FY26. 25% of the award is payable at threshold performance. |
Performance targets will apply over the performance period. The Committee will determine the applicable performance targets and their weightings to ensure they are appropriate. Performance conditions may be based on financial and/or non-financial measures (including strategic and ESG measures). A majority of the award will be based on financial measures. |
| Shareholding Requirement |
To encourage long-term share ownership and support alignment of interests with shareholders. |
At least half of the net shares vested under the deferred annual bonus and the LTIP must be retained until the shareholding requirement is met. |
During employment, Executive Directors must build up a shareholding worth 200% of salary. After employment, Executive Directors will be required to retain the lower of the shareholding requirement during employment or actual shareholding |
Not applicable. |
| NewRiver REIT plc Annual Report and Accounts 2025 | |
|---|---|
| -- | ----------------------------------------------------- |
| NewRiver REIT plc Annual Report and Accounts 2025 | Strategic Report | Governance Report | Financial Statements | ESG Data Sets & Appendix |
Glossary & Company Information |
141 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Element | Purpose and Link to Strategy | Operation | Maximum | Performance Target |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fixed | ||||
| Fees | To provide market- competitive Director fees. |
Annual fee for the Chair. Annual base fee for the Non-Executive Directors. |
Fee increases are applied in line with the outcome of the review. |
Not applicable. |
| Additional fees are paid to Non-Executive Directors for additional responsibilities such as being the Senior Independent Non-Executive Director or chairing a Board Committee. |
||||
| Fees are reviewed from time to time taking into account time commitment, responsibilities and fees paid by companies of a similar size and complexity. |
||||
| Payable in cash. | ||||
| Expenses incurred by Non-Executive Directors in connection with the fulfilment of their roles are reimbursed (including any personal tax due on such expenses). |
| NewRiver REIT plc Annual Report and Accounts 2025 | Strategic Report | Governance Report | Financial Statements | ESG Data Sets & Appendix |
Glossary & Company Information |
142 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Remuneration Committee Report continued |
When reviewing the Remuneration Policy, the Committee considered a wide range of factors, including:
The Committee also addressed the following factors when determining the Remuneration Policy and practices, as recommended by the 2018 UK Corporate Governance Code:
| Principle | Committee approach | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Clarity Remuneration arrangements should be transparent and promote effective engagement with shareholders and the workforce. |
As noted above there is a consistent approach taken, where possible, in relation to the application of the Remuneration Policy throughout the Company. For instance, all employees participate in an annual bonus plan and the PSP. |
||
| We consult with employees to explain how the Policy for Executive Directors aligns with the pay and conditions of the workforce other than, for instance, where there are more stringent requirements in the Executive Directors' Policy for corporate governance reasons. |
|||
| Simplicity | The components of our Remuneration Policy are consistent throughout the Company so they are simple to operate and | ||
| Remuneration structures should avoid complexity and their rationale and operation should be easy to understand. |
communicate. | ||
| Risk | We look carefully at the range of likely performance outcomes when setting performance target ranges and use discretion | ||
| Remuneration arrangements should ensure reputational and other risks from excessive rewards and behavioural risks that can arise from target-based incentive plans are identified and mitigated. |
where this leads to an inappropriate pay outcome. | ||
| Bonus deferral, holding periods on LTIP awards, shareholding requirement and clawback and malus provisions all help to mitigate risk. |
|||
| Predictability | Incentive plans are determined based on a proportion of base salary so there is a sensible balance between fixed pay and performance-linked elements. |
||
| The range of possible values of rewards to individual directors and any other limits or discretions should be identified and explained at the time of approving the policy. |
There are provisions to override the formula driven outcome of incentive plans and deferral and clawbacks to minimise the likelihood of a poor link between reward and performance. |
||
| Proportionality | Incentive plans are determined based on a proportion of base salary so there is a sensible balance between fixed pay and | ||
| The link between individual awards, the delivery of strategy and the long-term performance of the company should be clear. Outcomes should not reward poor performance. |
performance-linked elements. | ||
| There are provisions to override the formula driven outcome of incentive plans and deferral and clawbacks to ensure that poor performance is not rewarded. |
|||
| Alignment to culture | All staff are eligible for bonus plans which are approved by the Committee to ensure consistency with Company purpose, | ||
| Incentive schemes should drive behaviours consistent with company purpose, values and strategy. |
values and the performance measures are linked to the business strategy. |
Executive Directors' service contracts are terminable by either party giving the other 12 months' written notice. If notice is served by either party, the Executive Director may continue to receive base salary, benefits and pension for the duration of their notice period during which time the Company may require the individual to fulfil their current role or may place the individual on garden leave. The Committee will seek to minimise the level of payments to a departing Director, having regard to all circumstances, including the Company's contractual obligations to the Director, the reason for departure, and the Company's policy on mitigation.
The Company may elect to make a monthly payment of base salary, plus an amount in lieu of benefits/pension contribution/equivalent or just base salary, in lieu of notice. Any payments in lieu of notice would be phased monthly and subject to offset against earnings elsewhere. Reasonable outplacement and legal costs may be payable.
Where a Director may be entitled to pursue a claim against the Company in respect of his/her statutory employment rights or any other claim arising from the employment or its termination, the Committee will be entitled to negotiate settlement terms with the Director that the Committee considers to be reasonable in the circumstances and is in the best interests of the Company, and to enter into a settlement agreement with the Director.
In addition to the contractual provisions regarding payment on termination set out above, the Group's incentive plans and share plans contain provisions relating to termination of employment. Good leaver provisions relate
to termination of office or employment by reason of death, ill-health, injury, incapacity or disability of the award holder, redundancy or sale or transfer out of the Group or the Company or undertaking employing that employee, or any other circumstances stipulated by the Committee at the date of award.
For any good leaver the approach in relation to the incentive plans will be as follows:
Annual bonus: bonus may be payable at the normal time pro-rata for the portion of the year worked. Outstanding deferred bonus awards would be retained and would vest at the usual time.
PSP awards: awards would vest at the usual time subject to the achievement of the performance conditions and would normally be scaled back pro-rata for the extent of the vesting period completed at cessation of employment (unless in exceptional circumstances the Committee determines that the award should not be scaled back). The two-year post-vesting holding period would usually continue to apply.
If an Executive Director is not deemed to be a good leaver, all bonus entitlements and LTIP awards would normally lapse.
Non-Executive Directors' letters of appointment incorporate a notice period of three months.
No payment for compensation for loss of office will be made to the Chair or any Non-Executive Director other than where the Company determines that fees for the notice period should be paid. The details of the service contracts for Executive Directors and Letters of Appointment for the Non-Executive Directors are summarised as follows:
| Director | Date of Appointment | Expiry date of service agreement of letter of appointment |
|---|---|---|
| Allan Lockhart | 18 August 2016 | 12-month rolling contracts |
| Will Hobman | 20 August 2021 | |
| Lynn Fordham | 21 March 2024 | 3-month rolling contracts |
| Colin Rutherford | 5 February 2019 | |
| Dr Karen Miller | 30 May 2022 | |
| Charlie Parker | 10 September 2020 | |
| Alastair Miller | 18 August 2016 |
& Appendix
The service agreements are available for shareholders to view at the Company's Registered Office on request from the Company Secretary and at the Annual General Meeting.
Executive Directors may take up one external directorship, subject to the prior approval of the Board. In considering the appointment, the Board will consider whether the appointment will have an adverse impact on the Director's role within the Company and whether it will be a conflict of interest. Fees earned may be retained by the Director. At present, no Executive Director has an external directorship.
Executive Directors are encouraged to join, when invited, advisory committees of industries and professional bodies directly related to the Company's business. This helps to keep the Company informed of any future regulations or trends which may affect it in the future, as well as providing the opportunity to influence future decision making.
Company Information
The Committee will apply the same Remuneration Policy and principles when setting the remuneration package for a new Executive Director. The Committee will take into consideration all relevant factors to ensure that pay arrangements are in the best interests of the Company and its shareholders.
Ongoing benefits, pension provisions, annual bonus participation and awards under both the DBP and the PSP will be in line with those stated in the Policy. In exceptional circumstances, the maximum level of variable pay which may be awarded to a new Executive Director in the first year of appointment under the Policy will be 325% of salary (i.e. 125% annual bonus plus 200% PSP award).
Different performance measures may be set for any initial awards under the DBP and PSP after considering the responsibilities of the individual, the point in the year that they joined and the rules of the applicable plan. The rationale will be clearly explained in the Annual Report following such recruitment. The level of bonus which may be paid will be pro-rated to reflect the time in the year when the Executive Director joins.
The Committee will have discretion to make payments or awards to buy out incentive arrangements forfeited on leaving a previous employer, i.e. over and above the approach outlined in the table above and may exercise the discretion available under Listing Rule 9.3.2R if necessary to do so. In doing so, the Committee will match the fair value of the awards forfeited, taking account of the form, any applicable performance conditions and the likelihood of those conditions being met and the proportion of the applicable vesting period remaining.
Where an Executive Director appointment is an internal candidate, the Committee will honour any pre-existing remuneration obligations or outstanding variable pay arrangements that relate to the individual's previous role. Non-Executive Directors will be recruited on the basis of a Letter of Appointment with a three-month notice period.

| Minimum performance: | • comprising the minimum remuneration receivable (being base salary, pension and benefits received in FY25); |
|---|---|
| On target performance: | • comprising fixed pay, annual bonus payment at 50% of the maximum opportunity and long-term incentive awards vesting at 25% of maximum opportunity; |
| Maximum performance: | • comprising fixed pay, 100% of annual bonus and 100% vesting of long-term incentive awards; |
| Maximum performance with share price increase: |
• comprising fixed pay, 100% of annual bonus and 100% vesting of long-term incentive awards with the value increased for share price appreciation of 50%. |
This section sets out how the Directors' Remuneration Policy was implemented during the financial year ended 31 March 2025. Where stated, disclosures regarding Director's remuneration have been audited by the Company's external auditors, Forvis Mazars. This section, together with the Chair's Statement, is subject to an advisory vote at the 2025 AGM.
The Remuneration Committee comprises all of the Non-Executive Directors. The Remuneration Committee meets regularly throughout the year. It met four times during the year. A Board and Committee attendance chart is contained in the Governance Report on page 124.
• FY25 targets and objectives
The role of the Remuneration Committee is to establish a formal and transparent procedure for developing and implementing the Remuneration Policy. The Policy should have regard to the risk appetite of the Company and Executive remuneration should be aligned to the Company's purpose and values and be clearly linked to the successful delivery of the Company's long-term strategy. The Committee also reviews the remuneration of the Chair and senior executives below Board level. Terms of reference for the Remuneration Committee can be found on the Company's website.
Other main responsibilities of the Committee are to:
• review and have regard to workforce remuneration and related policies and the alignment of incentives and rewards with culture, taking these into account when setting remuneration policy for Directors and especially when determining annual salary increases;
Glossary &
Any potential conflicts of interest are managed carefully. No Director is present when their own remuneration is being discussed and Committee papers are redacted where appropriate to avoid individuals seeing proposals before they are discussed by the Committee. Each meeting minutes whether there are any potential conflicts for any members or attendees.
The Chief Executive Officer and Chief Operating and People Officer were invited to attend all or part of the meetings as and when relevant. These individuals were not present when their own remuneration was discussed. The Company Secretary acts as secretary to the Committee.
| NewRiver REIT plc Annual Report and Accounts 2025 | Strategic Report | Governance Report | Financial Statements | ESG Data Sets & Appendix |
Glossary & Company Information |
146 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
The following table summarises the details of votes cast for and against the Directors' Remuneration Policy at the 2023 AGM and the Directors' Remuneration Report at the 2024 AGM, along with the number of votes withheld.
| Votes for | % | Votes against | % | Total shares | for and against Votes withheld | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| That the Directors' Remuneration Report be received and approved (2024 AGM) |
181,087,011 | 98.71 | 2,360,864 | 1.24 | 183,447,875 | 89,223 |
| That the Directors' Remuneration | ||||||
| Policy be received and approved (2023 AGM) |
165,701,655 | 99.11 | 1,481,211 | 0.89 | 167,182,866 | 56,899 |
The Company is committed to ongoing shareholder dialogue and takes an active interest in voting outcomes. If there are substantial votes against resolutions in relation to Directors' Remuneration, the Company will seek the reasons for any such vote and will detail any resulting actions in the next Directors' Remuneration Report.
The Committee keeps itself fully informed on developments and best practice in the field of remuneration and it seeks advice from external advisers when appropriate. The Committee appoints its own independent remuneration advisers and appointed Korn Ferry in 2018 following a competitive process. During the year the Committee continued to retain the services of Korn Ferry. Korn Ferry is a member of the Remuneration Consultants Group and signatory to its Code of Conduct which can be found at www.remunerationconsultantsgroup.com. Korn Ferry provided advice on market practice updates and benchmarking and supported management with undertakings such as producing the Directors' remuneration report to the extent this did not impact the independence of its advice. During FY25 Korn Ferry did not provide any other services to the Company. Fees charged by Korn Ferry were on a time and materials basis and totalled £49,826 in the year ended 31 March 2025. The Committee reviews the performance and independence of its advisers on an annual basis and is satisfied that the advice provided is objective and independent.
| NewRiver REIT plc Annual Report and Accounts 2025 | Strategic Report | Governance Report | Financial Statements | ESG Data Sets & Appendix |
Glossary & Company Information |
147 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Remuneration Committee Report continued |
The following tables show a single figure total of remuneration for the year ended 31 March 2025 for each of the Directors and compares this figure to the prior year.
| Financial Year | Salary £ |
Benefits1 £ |
Pension2 £ |
Subtotal for fixed pay £ |
Cash bonus £ |
Value of bonus deferred into shares £ |
Long-Term Incentive Plans £ |
Subtotal for variable pay £ |
Total £ |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Allan Lockhart | 2025 | 498,623 | 5,905 | 19,945 | 524,473 | 361,601 | 154,972 | 252,231 | 768,804 | 1,293,277 |
| 2024 | 484,100 | 5,660 | 41,552 | 531,312 | 288,040 | 123,445 | 319,962 | 731,447 | 1,262,759 | |
| Will Hobman | 2025 | 344,793 | 2,660 | 13,792 | 361,245 | 250,044 | 107,161 | 174,415 | 531,620 | 892,865 |
| 2024 | 334,750 | 2,551 | 13,390 | 350,691 | 199,176 | 85,361 | 133,945 | 418,482 | 769,173 |
Benefits are the Directors' private medical cover.
Allan Lockhart received a pension contribution of 15% of salary until July 2023 after which his pension contribution reduced to 4%. Will Hobman received a pension contribution of 4% of salary throughout 2024 and 2025 in line with the contribution for the wider workforce during the period.
| Financial Year Base fee £ Audit Committee Chairman £ Remuneration Committee Chairman £ |
Senior Independent Non-Executive Director £ | Total £ | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lynn Fordham1 | 2025 | 164,800 | – | – | – | 164,800 |
| 2024 | 4,437 | – | – | – | 4,437 | |
| Alastair Miller | 2025 | 53,045 | – | 7,957 | 7,957 | 68,959 |
| 2024 | 51,500 | – | 7,725 | 7,725 | 66,950 | |
| Charlie Parker | 2025 | 53,045 | – | – | – | 53,045 |
| 2024 | 51,500 | – | – | – | 51,500 | |
| Colin Rutherford | 2025 | 53,045 | 7,957 | – | – | 61,002 |
| 2024 | 51,500 | 7,725 | – | – | 59,225 | |
| Dr Karen Miller | 2025 | 53,045 | – | – | – | 53,045 |
| 2024 | 51,500 | – | – | – | 51,500 | |
| Margaret Ford2 | 2025 | 27,467 | – | – | – | 27,467 |
| 2024 | 164,800 | – | – | – | 164,800 |
Lynn Fordham was appointed to the Board on 21 March 2024 as Chair Designate. Lynn received a pro-rata fee based on the annualised rate of £164,800 in 2024.
Margaret Ford resigned on 30 May 2024.
| NewRiver REIT plc Annual Report and Accounts 2025 | Strategic Report | Governance Report | Financial Statements | ESG Data Sets & Appendix |
Glossary & Company Information |
148 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Remuneration Committee Report continued |
Executive Directors had the opportunity to earn up to a maximum of 125% of salary on the basis of the achievement of the following measures. The performance against measures to 31 March 2025 is set out in the table below.
| Weighting | Threshold | Target | Stretch | Actual result | Achievement % of maximum available under that element |
Pay-out as a percentage of total bonus |
|||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Measure | 25% of maximum 50% of maximum 100% of maximum | Allan Lockhart | Will Hobman Allan Lockhart | Will Hobman | |||||
| Corporate | |||||||||
| Total Return vs IPD All Retail | 25% | At index | 10% ahead | 20% ahead | over 20% ahead | 50% | 50% | 12.5% | 12.5% |
| Earnings (UFFO) | 25% | £27m | £29m | £31m | £30.5m | 87.6% | 87.6% | 21.9% | 21.9% |
| Financial | |||||||||
| LTV | 10% | <44% | <43% | <42% | 42.30% | 85% | 85% | 8.5% | 8.5% |
| Strategic | |||||||||
| Strategic objectives | 40% | See below | 100% | 100% | 40% | 40% |
A summary of the strategic objectives are shown below:
| Strategic objectives | Weighting | Assessment of performance by the Committee | Achievement | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Allan Lockhart |
Will Hobman |
|||
| £6.7m synergies unlocked in terms of | ||||
| Unlocking synergy savings | 15% | two acquisitions | 15% | 15% |
| On track to deliver mid-to high-teens | ||||
| Value add capital deployment | 5% | UFFO per share accretion | 5% | 5% |
| Significantly oversubscribed equity | ||||
| Cost effective capital raise and resultant expansion of equity base | 7.5% | raise at 0.5p premium | 7.5% | 7.5% |
| Revenues have increased by 16% at | ||||
| Capital partnerships | 5% | net level | 5% | 5% |
| ESG Measures as per the below: | 7.5% | 7.5% | 7.5% | |
| Fully eliminated Market Based Scope | ||||
| Achieve Net Zero for Corporate related Emissions (Scope 1-2) | 1&2 emissions | |||
| Electric Vehicle charging points across the majority of assets with surface level | 72% of all car parks and 80% of | |||
| car parks | surface car parks | |||
| Improvement (from 2020 baseline) in landlord on site renewable energy | Following viability assessments a 7% | |||
| generation | improvement between 2023/24 | |||
| 75% response rate to our occupier satisfaction survey | 78% response rate | |||
| Total | 40% | 40% | 40% |
| NewRiver REIT plc Annual Report and Accounts 2025 | Strategic Report | Governance Report | Financial Statements | ESG Data Sets | Glossary & | 149 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Based on performance to 31 March 2025, the annual bonus outcome for the Executive Directors during the year is shown below. The Committee is satisfied that no adjustments to the pay-outs is required, and the outcome is reflective of underlying performance.
| Executive | Assessment of performance by the Committee | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| % of maximum | % of salary | Bonus outcome | ||
| Allan Lockhart | 82.9% | 103.6% | £516,573 | |
| Will Hobman | 82.9% | 103.6% | £357,205 |
30% of the bonus will be deferred into shares for two years. Deferred shares are subject to continued employment.
The FY23 LTIP Awards were granted to Allan Lockhart and Will Hobman on 6 July 2022. These awards are due to vest on 6 July 2025.
The performance targets for these awards are shown below:
| Weighting | Threshold | Target | Stretch | Actual result | Actual result |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Measure | 25% of | maximum 75% of maximum 100% of maximum | ||||
| Total Shareholder Return vs UK REITs1 |
50% | Median | 62.5 percentile |
Upper quartile | Above upper quartile |
100% |
| Total Accounting Return vs UK REITs1 |
50% | Median | 62.5 percentile |
Upper quartile | Below median |
0% |
| Total | 50% |
The Committee is comfortable that the formulaic outcome of the LTIP reflects wider business performance and so no discretion has been applied. The vesting levels for the FY23 LTIP awards are shown below:
& Appendix
| Executive | Grant date | Vest date | Number of shares granted |
Number of shares vesting |
Value of shares to vest |
Dividend equivalents in shares |
Total value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Allan Lockhart | 6 Jul 22 | 6 Jul 25 | 532,880 | 266,440 | £189,945 | 87,370 | £252,231 |
| Will Hobman | 6 Jul 22 | 6 Jul 25 | 368,481 | 184,240 | £131,345 | 60,415 | £174,415 |
• Both Allan Lockhart's and Will Hobman's FY23 awards remain subject to a two-year post-vesting holding period.
Company Information
The following Performance Share Plan awards were granted to Executive Directors as nil cost options on 25 September 2024:
| Executive | Value of awards at grant date1 (% salary) |
Number of shares comprising award |
% of award vesting at threshold |
Vesting Period End Date |
Holding Period End Date |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Allan Lockhart | £484,100 (100%) | 587,144 | 25% | 25 Sept 2027 | 25 Sept 2029 |
| Will Hobman | £334,750 (100%) | 406,004 | 25% | 25 Sept 2027 | 25 Sept 2029 |
Performance will be assessed from 1 April 2024 to 31 March 2027. The targets for both performance conditions are as follows:
| TSR ranking vs. UK REITs (60% of award) |
Total Accounting Return ranking vs. UK REITs (40% of award) |
Vesting (% of award) |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Below threshold | Less than Median (50th percentile) Less than Median (50th percentile) 0% | ||
| Threshold | Equal to Median (50th percentile) | Equal to Median (50th percentile) | 25% |
| Equal to 62.5th percentile | Equal to 62.5th percentile | 75% | |
| Equal to Upper Quartile | Equal to Upper Quartile (75th | ||
| Maximum | (75th percentile) and above | percentile) and above | 100% |
• 60% of each award may vest based on the Company's TSR compared to a group of UK REITs.
The TSR and TAR comparator group was composed of the companies set out in the list below.
| • | Segro | • | Great Portland | • | Shaftesbury | • | Londonmetric Property |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| • | Land Securities | Estates | Capital | • | Safestore Holdings | ||
| Group | • | Workspace Group | • | Unite Group | • | Primary Health | |
| • | British Land | • | Big Yellow Group | • | Tritax Big Box Reit | Properties | |
| • | Derwent London | • | Assura | • | Grainger | ||
| • | Hammerson | • | CLS Holdings |
Awards of Deferred Bonus Shares over the Company's shares were granted to Executive Directors as nil cost options in FY25 as shown below. The deferred share awards are based on 30% of the bonus awarded for the year to 31 March 2024. Vesting of the awards is normally subject to continued employment at the date of vesting in two years' time.
| Face value of the award at grant | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Executive | Number of shares granted1,2 | date | Grant date | Vest date3 |
| Allan Lockhart | 150,930 | £123,461 | 25 Sept 2024 | 25 Sept 2026 |
| Will Hobman | 104,366 | £85,371 | 25 Sept 2024 | 25 Sept 2026 |
The 5-day average close price on the day before the grant date has been used to determine the number of shares comprising the award. This was 81.8p.
Awards are not subject to performance conditions.
Vesting of awards is normally subject to continued employment unless an employee leaver is deemed a 'Good Leaver'.
| NewRiver REIT plc Annual Report and Accounts 2025 | Strategic Report | Governance Report | Financial Statements | ESG Data Sets & Appendix |
Glossary & Company Information |
151 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Remuneration Committee Report continued |
The beneficial interests of the Executive Directors in share awards and share options as at 31 March 2025 are shown in the following tables.
| Allan Lockhart | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grant Date | Plan | Vesting by1 | Share price at date of award £ |
Exercise price £ |
At 31 March 2024 | Granted | Dividend equivalent shares added2 |
Lapsed | Exercised4 | At 31 March 2025 |
| Aug 2020 | PSP | Aug 2023 | 0.63 | nil | 314,962 | – | 26,106 | – | – | 341,068 |
| Sept 2021 | PSP | Sept 2024 | 0.78 | nil | 729,680 | – | 44,464 | (379,130) | – | 395,014(3) |
| July 2022 | DBP | July 2024 | 0.88 | nil | 174,611 | – | 6,839 | – | (181,450) | – |
| July 2022 | PSP | July 2025 | 0.88 | nil | 624,649 | – | 51,663 | – | – | 676,312 |
| June 2023 | DBP | June 2025 | 0.89 | nil | 178,912 | - | 14,796 | – | – | 193,708 |
| June 2023 | PSP | June 2026 | 0.89 | nil | 568,655 | - | 47,031 | – | – | 615,686 |
| Sept 2024 | DBP | Sept 2026 | 0.82 | nil | – | 150,930 | 6,323 | – | – | 157,253 |
| Sept 2024 | PSP | Sept 2027 | 0.82 | nil | – | 587,144 | 24,601 | – | – | 611,745 |
| Total | 2,591,469 | 738,074 | 221,823 | (379,130) | (181,450) | 2,990,786 |
| Will Hobman | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grant Date | Plan | Vesting by1 | Share price at date of award £ |
Exercise price £ |
At 31 March 2024 | Granted | Dividend equivalent shares added2 |
Lapsed | Exercised5 | At 31 March 2025 |
| Sept 2021 | PSP | Sept 2024 | 0.78 | nil | 318,263 | – | 19,393 | (165,364) | – | 172,292(3) |
| July 2022 | DBP | July 2024 | 0.88 | nil | 128,069 | – | 5,016 | – | (133,085) | – |
| July 2022 | PSP | July 2025 | 0.88 | nil | 431,938 | – | 35,724 | – | – | 467,662 |
| June 2023 | DBP | June 2025 | 0.89 | nil | 123,715 | – | 10,231 | – | – | 133,946 |
| June 2023 | PSP | June 2026 | 0.89 | nil | 393,218 | – | 32,521 | – | – | 425,739 |
| Sept 2024 | DBP | Sept 2026 | 0.82 | nil | – | 104,366 | 4,372 | – | – | 108,738 |
| Sept 2024 | PSP | Sept 2027 | 0.82 | nil | – | 406,004 | 17,011 | – | – | 423,015 |
| Total | 1,395,203 | 510,370 | 124,268 | (165,364) | (133,085) | 1,731,392 |
A holding period of two years is applied following vesting for the PSP awards.
The right to dividends is accrued and is only payable if and to the extent that the awards vest. Once vested the dividends will continue to accrue on the vested awards during the holding period. The FY25 final dividend declared is not included in this figure.
Dividends continue to accrue on the vested awards during the holding period. For the FY25 interim dividend payment in January 2025 dividends of 15,885 accrued to Allan's vested awards and 6,928 accrued to Will's vested awards.
Allan Lockhart's awards were exercised on 17 December 2024. Some of the shares were sold to cover tax at a share price of 79.16p. The aggregate gain from exercising the awards was £143,636.
Will Hobman's awards were exercised on 17 December 2024. Some of the shares were sold to cover tax at a share price of 79.16p. The aggregate gain from exercising these awards was £105,350.
DBP = Deferred Bonus Plan PSP = Performance Share Plan
| NewRiver REIT plc Annual Report and Accounts 2025 | Strategic Report | Governance Report | Financial Statements | ESG Data Sets & Appendix |
Glossary & Company Information |
152 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Remuneration Committee Report continued | ||||||
It is the Board's policy that Executive Directors build up and retain a minimum shareholding of 200% of base salary. Beneficially owned shares, vested and unvested DBP awards plus vested but unexercised PSP awards may be counted towards the value of the executives' shareholdings for the purposes of the 200% holding guideline.
The beneficial interests of Directors who served during the year, in the shares of the Company are as follows:
| Beneficially owned shares held at 31 March 2025 |
Value of beneficially owned shares as % of salary1 |
Vested but unexercised DBP awards held at 31 March 2025 |
Vested but unexercised PSP awards held at 31 March 2025 |
Unvested DBP awards held at 31 March 2025 |
Value of holdings including vested PSP and unvested DBP2 |
Unvested PSP awards held at 31 March 2025 |
Total held as at 31 March 2025 |
Shareholding % of salary |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Allan Lockhart | 726,280 | 101% | - | 736,083 | 350,961 | 252% | 1,903,743 | 3,717,067 | 252% |
| Will Hobman | 495,771 | 100% | – | 172,292 | 242,684 | 183% | 1,316,416 | 2,227,163 | 183% |
| Lynn Fordham | 187,500 | – | – | – | – | – | – | 187,500 | N/A |
| Alastair Miller | 147,462 | – | – | – | – | – | – | 147,462 | N/A |
| Colin Rutherford | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | N/A |
| Charlie Parker | 21,454 | – | – | – | – | – | – | 21,454 | N/A |
| Dr Karen Miller | 18,750 | – | – | – | – | – | – | 18,750 | N/A |
| Margaret Ford6 | 106,440 | – | – | – | – | – | – | 106,440 | N/A |
Based on the closing share price of 69.40p as at 31 March 2025 and salary for FY25.
Includes dividend equivalent shares added to that date. Although vested these awards have not yet been exercised.
All awards are nil cost awards.
Vested but unexercised PSPs are not subject to performance conditions. Unvested PSPs are subject to performance conditions. Outstanding DBP awards are not subject to performance conditions. The details of outstanding scheme interests are included in the table on page 151.
At least half of the net shares vested under the deferred annual bonus and the PSP must be retained until the shareholding requirement is met.
Margaret Ford resigned on 30 May 2024. As such her shareholding is reported as at the date of her resignation.
DBP = Deferred Bonus Plan PSP = Performance Share Plan
There have been no changes in the number of shares held from 31 March 2025 to 5 June 2025, being the latest practicable date before the publication of this Annual Report.
No payments have been made to past Directors or for loss of office.
| NewRiver REIT plc Annual Report and Accounts 2025 |
|---|

The following information allows comparison of the Company's TSR (based on share price growth and dividends reinvested) with the remuneration of the CEO over the last ten years, together with bonus and LTIP pay-outs (as a percentage of the maximum).
The chart shows the Company's TSR and that of the FTSE 250 and the FTSE 350 REIT Indices based on an initial investment of £100 on 1 April 2015 and values at intervening financial year ends over a ten-year period to 31 March 2025. These are considered to be appropriate benchmarks for the graph as the Company was a constituent of these indices during the financial years shown and is in line with the approach used historically.
| Total remuneration (£) | Annual bonus (% of max) Total LTIP vesting (% of max) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 | David Lockhart | 1,792,205 | 100 | 50 |
| 2017 | David Lockhart | 1,341,958 | 66.7 | 76.3 |
| 2018 | David Lockhart | 1,012,946 | 77.3 | 13.1 |
| 2019 | Allan Lockhart | 911,972 | 64 | – |
| 20201 | Allan Lockhart | 543,239 | – | – |
| 2021 | Allan Lockhart | 637,339 | 20 | – |
| 2022 | Allan Lockhart | 984,462 | 75 | – |
| 2023 | Allan Lockhart | 1,276,384 | 82.5 | 50 |
| 2024 | Allan Lockhart | 1,262,759 | 68 | 50 |
| 2025 | Allan Lockhart | 1,293,277 | 82.9 | 50 |

| NewRiver REIT plc Annual Report and Accounts 2025 | Strategic Report | Governance Report | Financial Statements | ESG Data Sets & Appendix |
Glossary & Company Information |
154 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Remuneration Committee Report continued |
The ratio of the CEO's pay to the 25th, 50th and 75th percentile is shown, along with the total pay for the employees at the three quartiles. Prior to FY25 the Group had fewer than 250 employees and so the CEO pay ratio was disclosed on a voluntary basis.
We have based the calculation on the methodology outlined in Option A under the regulations, although, we have chosen not to disclose the three salary levels for the relevant employees to allow a simpler comparison with the total pay of the CEO. This method is, in the Committee's view, the most comprehensive and accurate reflection of the remuneration picture across our employee population.
The ratio calculated by reference to actual pay rates on 31 March 2025 and based on the CEO's full salary.
The CEO ratio has been calculated for all permanent Group employees. Following the acquisition of Capital & Regional, which includes the Snozone business, there are now a significant number of hourly-paid staff which impacts the outcome of the CEO ratio. The Committee has used the ratio as part of the overall review of the implementation of the Remuneration Policy. In addition, the Committee is comfortable that the pay ratio is a fair and accurate reflection of the differences to the level of pay of the CEO compared with the workforce more generally as well as the pay, reward and progression policies.
| Year | Method | 25th percentile pay ratio | Median pay ratio | 75th percentile pay ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FY25 | Option A | 17.3.1 | 46.4.1 | 47.4.1 |
| FY24 | Option A | 7.6:1 | 13.2:1 | 17.7:1 |
| FY23 | Option A | 6.6:1 | 12.6:1 | 19.2:1 |
| FY22 | Option A | 7:1 | 12.7:1 | 17.2:1 |
| FY21 | Option A | 7:1 | 9:1 | 19:1 |
| FY20 | Option A | 8:1 | 17:1 | 34:1 |
The total pay for the individuals identified at the Lower quartile, Median and Upper quartile positions are set out below:
| FY25 | FY25 |
|---|---|
| Salaries | Total Pay |
| 73,987 | |
| 27,648 | |
| 27,040 | 27,040 |
| 67,500 27,070 |
| NewRiver REIT plc Annual Report and Accounts 2025 | Strategic Report | Governance Report | Financial Statements | ESG Data Sets & Appendix |
Glossary & Company Information |
155 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
The table below sets out the percentage change in base salary, value of taxable benefits and bonus for all the Directors compared with the average percentage change for employees.
| FY24/FY25 | FY23/FY24 | FY22/FY23 | FY21/FY22 | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Directors | Salary/fee | Benefits | Annual Bonus |
Salary/fee | Benefits | Annual Bonus |
Salary/fee | Benefits | Annual Bonus |
Salary/fee | Benefits | Annual Bonus |
| Executive Directors | ||||||||||||
| Allan Lockhart | 3% | 4% | 26% | 3% | 13% | -15% | 0% | 50% | 10% | 0% | 18% | 369% |
| Will Hobman1 | 3% | 4% | 26% | 3% | 18% | -15% | 0% | 33% | 9% | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| Non-Executive Directors | ||||||||||||
| Lynn Fordham2 | 0% | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| Alastair Miller | 3% | N/A | N/A | 3% | N/A | N/A | 0% | N/A | N/A | 0% | N/A | N/A |
| Charlie Parker | 3% | N/A | N/A | 3% | N/A | N/A | 0% | N/A | N/A | 0% | N/A | N/A |
| Colin Rutherford | 3% | N/A | N/A | 3% | N/A | N/A | 6% | N/A | N/A | 60% | N/A | N/A |
| Dr Karen Miller3 | 3% | N/A | N/A | 3% | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| Margaret Ford5 | N/A | N/A | N/A | 3% | N/A | N/A | 0% | N/A | N/A | 0% | N/A | N/A |
| All Employees4 | 7.22% | 15.35% | 14.22% | 6% | 12% | -8% | 5% | 20% | 96% | 5% | 20% | 96% |
Will Hobman was appointed to the Board on 20 August 2021. For ease of comparison, we have compared his pay on a pro-rated basis.
Lynn Fordham was appointed to the Board on 21 March 2024. For ease of comparison, we have compared her pay on a pro-rated basis
Dr Karen Miller was appointed to the Board on 30 May 2022. For ease of comparison, we have compared her pay on a pro-rated basis
All employees are used as there are no employees of the listed parent company.
Margaret Ford stepped down from the Board on 30 May 2024. For ease of comparison, we have compared her pay on a pro-rated basis
Remuneration Committee Report continued
The table below shows employee pay and distributions to shareholders for FY25 and FY24.
| FY25 £'000 | FY24 £'000 | % difference from prior year | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total spend on employee pay1 | 10,429 | 6,645 | 36.3% |
| Total distributions to shareholders | 24,108 | 20,272 | 15.9% |
| Share Buybacks | – | – | 0% |
| NewRiver REIT plc Annual Report and Accounts 2025 | Strategic Report | Governance Report | Financial Statements | ESG Data Sets & Appendix |
Glossary & Company Information |
156 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
The section below sets out the implementation of the Remuneration Policy in FY26. A summary of changes to the implementation of the policy are set out in the Chair's statement on page 136.
The base salaries for FY25 are set out below:
| Executive | Salary for FY24 Salary for FY25 | % increase | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Allan Lockhart – Chief Executive Officer | £498,628 | £513,582 | 3% |
| Will Hobman – Chief Financial Officer | £344,793 | £355,136 | 3% |
The Committee also reviewed the Chair fees and the Board (minus the Non-Executive Directors) reviewed the Non-Executive Director fees. As a result of these reviews, the Chair fee, NED base fee, and senior Independent Director fee were increased by 3%, while the Committee Chair fees were increased by 26%. The fees for the Chair and Non-Executive Directors in FY25 and FY26 are set out below:
| Director | Fees for FY25 | Fees for FY26 | % increase |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chair | £164,800 | £169,744 | 3% |
| Basic fee for a Non-Executive Director | £53,045 | £54,600 | 3% |
| Additional fee for serving as Chair of the Audit and Remuneration Committees |
£7,957 | £10,000 | 26% |
| Additional fee for serving as the Senior Independent | |||
| Non-Executive Director | £7,957 | £8,195 | 3% |
The annual bonus will operate as laid out in the Remuneration Policy. Executive Directors will have the opportunity to earn a bonus up to a normal maximum of 125% of salary.
In line with FY25, the bonus will be based on financial and corporate measures as well as personal strategic objectives.
The Committee intends to grant LTIP awards to Executive Directors of 150% of salary. The extent to which the LTIP awards will vest will be determined by the performance measures listed below.
| Threshold | Target | Stretch | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Measure | Weighting | 25% of maximum | 75% of maximum | 100% of maximum |
| Relative TSR vs UK REIT peer group | 60% | Median | 62.5 percentile | Upper Quartile |
| Relative TAR vs UK REIT peer group | 40% | Median | 62.5 percentile | Upper Quartile |
Awards must be held by Executive Directors for a further two years after vesting.
Signed on behalf of the Board
Committee Chair
16 June 2025

The Directors present their report together with the audited consolidated financial statements and the report of the auditor for the year ended 31 March 2025.
Kerin Williams Company Secretary
16 June 2025
NewRiver REIT plc (the 'Company') is an equity shares (commercial companies) listed REIT on the London Stock Exchange. The Company is a specialist real estate investor, asset manager and developer focused solely on the UK retail sector. Details of the Group's principal subsidiary undertakings are set out on pages 200 to 203.
The Financial Reporting Council published a revised UK Corporate Governance Code in July 2018 (the 'Code'). Further information on the Code can be found on the Financial Reporting Council's website at: www.frc.org.uk. The Company's Statement on Governance can be found on page 113.
The Directors have proposed a final dividend of 3.5 pence per share. Together with the interim dividend of 3.0 pence, the total dividend for FY25 is 6.5 pence. The final dividend is payable on 8 August 2025 to shareholders on the register as at 20 June 2025. 3.5 pence will be paid as a PID net of withholding tax where appropriate. The Company will be offering a scrip dividend alternative. A dividend of 6.7 pence per share was paid in FY24.
Strategic Report Governance Report
The Directors, who served throughout the year unless stated otherwise, are detailed below:
| Service in the year to 31 March 2025 | |
|---|---|
| Margaret Ford | Resigned 30 May 2024 |
| Lynn Fordham | Served throughout the year |
| Allan Lockhart | Served throughout the year |
| Will Hobman | Served throughout the year |
| Alastair Miller | Served throughout the year |
| Karen Miller | Served throughout the year |
| Charlie Parker | Served throughout the year |
| Colin Rutherford |
Served throughout the year |
Margaret Ford stepped down from the Board on 30 May 2024. Unless stated otherwise the rest of the Directors were in office during the year and up to the date of signing the financial statements. The roles and biographies of the Directors in office as at the date of this report are set out on pages 115 to 116.
& Appendix
Directors' Report continued
The Strategic Report is set out on pages 2 to 111 and is incorporated into the Directors' Report by reference. Additional information, which is incorporated by reference into this Directors' Report, including information required in accordance with the Companies Act 2006 and the UK Listing Rules of the Financial Conduct Authority, can be located as follows:
| Found on page | |
|---|---|
| s.172 statement | Page 59 |
| Staff, culture and employee involvement |
Staff - pages 6, 20, 23, 59 and 60 to 61 |
| Directors' interests | Pages 149 to 152 of the Directors' Remuneration Report |
| Stakeholder engagement | Strategic Report - pages 2 to 111 |
| Statement on business relationships | Strategic Report - pages 2 to 111 |
| Environmental policy | ESG Report - pages 68 to 97 |
| Greenhouse gas emissions | ESG Report - pages 68 to 97 |
| Future business developments | Strategic Report - pages 2 to 111 |
| Financial risk management objectives and policies |
Pages 98 to 108 and pages 193 to 195 |
| Going concern | Page 110 and 173 |
| Viability statement | Page 109 |
| Governance report | Pages 112 to 160 |
| Diversity | Pages 61 and 128 to 130 |
Subject to the Company's Articles of Association, UK legislation and any directions given by special resolution, the business of the Company is managed by the Board, which may exercise all the powers of the Company.
The Board's role is to provide entrepreneurial leadership of the Company within a framework of prudent and effective controls which enables risk to be assessed and managed. It also sets the Group's strategic aims, ensuring that the necessary financial and human resources are in place for the Group to meet its objectives and review management performance.
M&G Plc 16,139,931 3.38% Powers of Directors The Board also sets the Group's values, standards and culture. Further details on the Board's role can be found in the Corporate Governance Report on pages 114 to 122.
Details of the Directors' share interests can be found in the Directors' Remuneration Report on pages 149 to 152. All related party transactions are disclosed in note 27 to the financial statements.
The Company's Articles of Association provide for the Directors and officers of the Company to be appropriately indemnified, subject to the provisions of the Companies Act 2006. Qualifying third-party indemnity provisions (as defined by section 234 of the Companies Act 2006) were in force during the year ended 31 March 2025 and remain in force at the date of signing this report. The Company purchases and maintains insurance for the Directors and officers of the Company in performing their duties, as permitted by section 233 Companies Act 2006. This insurance has been in place during the year and remains in place at the date of signing this report.
The Company's latest Articles of Association were adopted at the 2021 AGM. The rules governing the appointment and replacement of Directors are contained in the Company's Articles of Association. Changes to the Articles of Association must be approved by shareholders in accordance with legislation in force from time to time. A copy of the Company's Articles of Association can be found on the Company's website, www.nrr.co.uk.
The tables below show the interests in shares notified to the Company in accordance with Chapter 5 of the Disclosure Guidance and Transparency Rules of the Financial Conduct Authority as at 31 March 2025 and as at 5 June 2025 (being a date not more than one month prior to the date of the Notice of AGM):
| Shareholder | Number of shares |
% of issued share capital |
|---|---|---|
| Growthpoint | ||
| Properties | ||
| (Johannesburg) | 67,385,444 | 14.12% |
| FIL Limited | 52,984,623 | 11.17% |
| Premier Miton | 24,067,235 | 5.04% |
| M&G Plc | 16,245,439 | 3.41% |
| Shareholder | Number of shares |
% of issued Share Capital |
|---|---|---|
| Growthpoint | ||
| Properties | ||
| Johannesburg | 67,385,444 | 14.12% |
| FIL Limited | 52,984,623 | 11.17% |
| Premier Miton | 20,657,616 | 4.33% |
Strategic Report Governance Report
& Appendix
Directors' Report continued
Taking into account the principal risks, emerging risks and the ongoing work of the Audit Committee in monitoring the risk management and internal control systems on behalf of the Board, the Directors:
The Company has no branches outside the UK.
The Group's exposure to, and management of, capital risk, market risk and liquidity risk is set out in note 25 to the Group's financial statements.
As at 31 March 2025, the Company's issued share capital consisted of 477,084,008 ordinary shares of one pence each. No shares are held in treasury. During the year 62,737,200 new ordinary shares of one pence each in the Company were issued on 23 September 2024 in respect of a Placing and REX Retail Offer. 98,321,755 ordinary shares were issued on 10 December 2024 in accordance with the recommended cash and share offer by the Company for Capital and Regional plc. As at 31 March 2025 the EBT held 1,624,929 ordinary shares. Therefore, the total number of voting rights in the Company is 475,459,079. Further details of the share capital, including changes throughout the year are summarised in note 23 of the financial statements.
Ordinary shareholders are entitled to receive notice of, and to attend and speak at, any general meeting of the Company. On a show of hands, every shareholder present in person or by proxy (or being a corporation represented by a duly authorised representative) shall have one vote, and on a poll every shareholder who is present in person or by proxy shall have one vote for every share of which he or she is the holder. The Notice of Annual General Meeting specifies deadlines for exercising voting rights and appointing a proxy or proxies.
There are no restrictions on the transfer of shares except the UK Real Estate Investment Trust restrictions. The Directors are not aware of any agreements between holders of the Company's shares that may result in the restriction of the transfer of securities or of voting rights.
Subject to authorisation by shareholder resolution, the Company may purchase its own shares in accordance with the Companies Act 2006. Any shares which have been bought back may be held as treasury shares or cancelled immediately upon completion of the purchase. At the Annual General Meeting held in 2024, shareholders authorised the Company to make purchases (within the meaning of section 693 of the Companies Act 2006) of the Company's ordinary shares, up to a maximum of 10% of the issued share capital at that time, as well as the allotment of new shares within certain limits approved by shareholders. The Company has not repurchased any of its ordinary shares under this authority, which is due to expire at the AGM in 2025 and appropriate renewals will be sought. There are no securities of the Company carrying special rights with regards to the control of the Company in issue.
The Company was not party to any significant contracts that are subject to change of control permissions in the event of a change of control, but other agreements may alter or terminate upon such an event.
The Company does not have any agreements with any Executive Director or employee that would provide compensation for loss of office or employment resulting from a takeover except that the Group's incentive plans and share plans contain provisions relating to termination of employment. Further information is provided in the Summary of the Directors' Remuneration Policy set out on pages 139 to 142.
Forvis Mazars LLP were appointed auditors at the last AGM held in 2024 to replace PriceWaterhouseCoopers LLP and have indicated their willingness to continue in office and a resolution seeking to re-appoint Forvis Mazars LLP will be proposed at the forthcoming AGM.
The Annual General Meeting will be held on 31 July 2025. At the meeting, resolutions will be proposed to receive the Annual Report and financial statements, approve the Directors' Remuneration Report, re-elect Directors and appoint an auditor and authorise the Audit Committee to determine the remuneration of the auditor. In addition, it will be proposed that expiring authorities to allot shares and to repurchase shares are extended. An explanation of the resolutions to be put to the shareholders at the 2025 AGM and the recommendations in relation to them will be set out in the 2025 AGM Notice.
No political donations were made by the Company or its subsidiaries during the year (2024: Nil).
The Directors' Report was approved by the Board of Directors on 16 June 2025.
By Order of the Board
Kerin Williams Company Secretary
16 June 2025
Strategic Report Governance Report
& Appendix
Glossary & Company Information
The Directors are responsible for preparing the Annual Report and Accounts and the financial statements in accordance with applicable law and regulation.
Company law requires the Directors to prepare financial statements for each financial year. Under that law the Directors have prepared the Group financial statements in accordance with UK-adopted international accounting standards and the Company financial statements in accordance with United Kingdom Generally Accepted Accounting Practice (United Kingdom Accounting Standards, comprising FRS 101 'Reduced Disclosure Framework', and applicable law).
Under company law, Directors must not approve the financial statements unless they are satisfied that they give a true and fair view of the state of affairs of the Group and Company and of the profit or loss of the Group for that period. In preparing the financial statements, the Directors are required to:
The Directors are responsible for safeguarding the assets of the Group and Company and hence for taking reasonable steps for the prevention and detection of fraud and other irregularities.
The Directors are also responsible for keeping adequate accounting records that are sufficient to show and explain the Group's and Company's transactions and disclose with reasonable accuracy at any time the financial position of the Group and Company and enable them to ensure that the financial statements and the Directors' Remuneration Report comply with the Companies Act 2006.
The Directors are responsible for the maintenance and integrity of the Company's website. Legislation in the United Kingdom governing the preparation and dissemination of financial statements may differ from legislation in other jurisdictions.
Each of the Directors, whose names and functions are listed in the Governance Report confirm that, to the best of their knowledge:
In the case of each Director in office at the date the Directors' report is approved:
The confirmation is given and should be interpreted in accordance with the provisions of section 418 of the Companies Act 2006.
By Order of the Board
Lynn Fordham Non-Executive Chair
16 June 2025
We have audited the financial statements of NewRiver REIT plc (the 'Parent Company') and its subsidiaries (the 'Group') for the year ended 31 March 2025 which comprise the Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Income, the Consolidated Balance Sheet, the Consolidated Cash Flow Statement, the Consolidated Statement of Changes in Equity, the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements, including material accounting policy information, the Company Balance Sheet, the Company Statement of Changes in Equity and the Notes to the Company Financial Statements, including material accounting policy information.
The financial reporting framework that has been applied in the preparation of the Group financial statements is applicable law and UK-adopted international accounting standards. The financial reporting framework that has been applied in the preparation of the Parent Company financial statements is applicable law and UK Accounting Standards, including FRS 101 "Reduced Disclosure Framework" (UK Generally Accepted Accounting Practice) and as applied in accordance with the provisions of the Companies Act 2006.
In our opinion, the financial statements:
We conducted our audit in accordance with International Standards on Auditing (UK) (ISAs (UK)) and applicable law. Our responsibilities under those standards are further described in the "Auditor's responsibilities for the audit of the financial statements" section of our report. We are independent of the Group and the Parent Company in accordance with the ethical requirements that are relevant to our audit of the financial statements in the UK, including the FRC's Ethical Standard as applied to listed entities and public interest entities, and we have fulfilled our other ethical responsibilities in accordance with these requirements. We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our opinion.
In auditing the financial statements, we have concluded that the Directors' use of the going concern basis of accounting in the preparation of the financial statements is appropriate.
Our audit procedures to evaluate the Directors' assessment of the Group's and the Parent company's ability to continue to adopt the going concern basis of accounting included but were not limited to:
Based on the work we have performed, we have not identified any material uncertainties relating to events or conditions that, individually or collectively, may cast significant doubt on the Group's and the Parent Company's ability to continue as a going concern for a period of at least twelve months from when the financial statements are authorised for issue.
Our responsibilities and the responsibilities of the Directors with respect to going concern are described in the relevant sections of this report.
In relation to NewRiver REIT plc's reporting on how it has applied the UK Corporate Governance Code, we have nothing material to add or draw attention to in relation to the directors' statement in the financial statements about whether the Director's considered it appropriate to adopt the going concern basis of accounting.
Key audit matters are those matters that, in our professional judgment, were of most significance in our audit of the financial statements of the current period and include the most significant assessed risks of material misstatement (whether or not due to fraud) we identified, including those which had the greatest effect on: the overall audit strategy; the allocation of resources in the audit; and directing the efforts of the engagement team. These matters were addressed in the context of our audit of the financial statements as a whole, and in forming our opinion thereon, and we do not provide a separate opinion on these matters.
We summarise below the key audit matters in forming our opinion above, together with an overview of the principal audit procedures performed to address each matter and our key observations arising from those procedures.
These matters, together with our findings, were communicated to those charged with governance through our Audit Completion Report.
Refer to the Audit Committee's discussion of this Key Audit Matter on page 133, Note 1 Accounting policies 'Investment properties', Note 2 Critical accounting judgements and estimates 'Investment property' and Note 14 Investment Properties.
Investment properties, excluding the right of use asset on investment property of £51.8 million (31 March 2024: £74.9 million), have a carrying value of £887.5 million at 31 March 2025 (31 March 2024: £533.8 million), comprising 84% (31 March 2024: 70%) of the Group's Total Assets.
Our audit procedures included, but were not limited to:
& Appendix
| Key Audit Matter | How our scope addressed this matter | |
|---|---|---|
| ------------------ | -- | ------------------------------------- |
Based on the work performed and evidence obtained, we consider the methodology and assumptions used to value the investment properties to be appropriate.
continued
Strategic Report
In determining the value of investment properties, the external valuers consider property specific information such as current tenancy agreements and rental income. The external valuers then apply judgmental assumptions to the investment properties such as, but not limited to, estimated rental value ('ERV') and yield, which are influenced by prevailing market conditions and, where appropriate, comparable market transactions to arrive at the final valuation.
As a result of the above factors, the valuation of investment properties is considered to be a Key Audit Matter.
Key Audit Matter How our scope addressed this matter
& Appendix
Glossary & Company Information
The value of investment properties is the key driver of the Group's underlying performance and involves a significant level of judgment in ascertaining the fair value under IFRS 13. The valuation of the investment properties is inherently subjective due to, among other factors, the individual nature of each property, its location and the expected future rentals. The wider challenges currently facing the real estate sector, because of regional and macroeconomic factors, further contributed to the subjectivity in establishing valuations for the year ended 31 March 2025.
The valuations are carried out by external valuers, Colliers, Knight Frank and Kroll. The external valuers are engaged by the Directors and performed their work in accordance with the Royal Institute of Chartered Surveyors ("RICS") Valuation – Professional Standards, the requirements of IAS 40 'Investment property' and IFRS 13 'Fair value measurement'.
| Key Audit Matter | How our scope addressed this matter |
|---|---|
| ------------------ | ------------------------------------- |
Our audit procedures included, but were not limited to:
Based on the work performed and evidence obtained, we concluded the risk of material misstatement of the occurrence and accuracy of rental income was reduced to an acceptable level.
Strategic Report
Acquisition of Capital & Regional plc (C&R) (Group)
Refer to Note 1 in relation to significant estimates and accounting policies.
Refer to Note 17 in relation to the acquisition of C&R.
During the year, the Parent Company acquired the entire issued ordinary share capital of C&R. The consideration for the acquisition was based on a combination of a pre-agreed cash-for-share ratio and share-for-share ratio.
The accounting entries and judgment regarding the accounting treatment for the acquisition, together with the related disclosures is considered a key audit matter given the significant and subjective judgments made by the Directors as to whether the acquisition is accounted for as a business combination or an asset acquisition.
An incorrect judgment with regards to the accounting treatment or incorrect allocation of the discount on acquisition and transaction costs to the identifiable acquired assets could result in a material misstatement of the financial statements.
Our audit procedures included, but were not limited to:
• Obtaining Management's formal assessment of the accounting for the acquisition which included the basis for treating the acquisition as an asset acquisition;
Glossary &
Based on the work performed we consider Management's accounting and disclosures in this area to be appropriate.
Refer to Note 1 Accounting policies 'Revenue recognition – Property, rental and related income' and Note 4 Revenue 'Rental related income'.
Rental-related income, excluding car park income of £7 million (31 March 2024: £5.4 million), has a carrying value of £53 million at 31 March 2025 (31 March 2024: £46 million), comprising 67% (31 March 2024: 71%) of the Group's Total Revenue.
Rental income is a key driver of the Group's underlying European Public Real Estate Association ('EPRA') performance (refer to Note 12 of the financial statements which includes a reconciliation between IFRS and EPRA earnings). There is a risk that revenue in relation to the rental income may not be accurately recognised as well as the potential to record fictitious revenues.
As a result of the above factors, the occurrence and accuracy of rental-related income is considered to be a Key Audit Matter.
| Our application of materiality and an overview |
|---|
| of the scope of our audit |
The scope of our audit was influenced by our application of materiality. We set certain quantitative thresholds for materiality. These, together with qualitative considerations, helped us to determine the scope of our audit and the nature, timing and extent of our audit procedures on the individual financial statement line items and disclosures and in evaluating the effect of misstatements, both individually and on the financial statements as a whole. Based on our professional judgement, we determined materiality for the financial statements as a whole as follows:
| Group materiality | |
|---|---|
| Overall materiality |
£10.5m |
| How we determined it |
1% of Group total assets |
| Rationale for benchmark applied |
We determined materiality based on total assets given the valuation of investment properties is the key determinant of the Group's value. |
| Performance materiality, specific materiality and specific performance materiality |
Performance materiality is set to reduce to an appropriately low level the probability that the aggregate of uncorrected and undetected misstatements in the financial statements exceeds materiality for the financial statements as a whole. |
| Based on this being our first-year audit of the Group, together with our risk assessments and our assessment of the Group's overall control environment we set performance materiality at £5.3m, which represents 50% of overall materiality. |
|
| We have applied a lower specific materiality threshold of £1.4 million, which represents 5% of the Group's 2025 EPRA earnings, for testing all balances impacting EPRA earnings. We set specific performance materiality at £0.7m, which represents 50% of the specific materiality. |
|
| In arriving at this materiality, we have regard to the fact that EPRA earnings are a secondary financial indicator of the Group (refer to Note 12 of the financial statements which includes a reconciliation between IFRS and EPRA earnings). This materiality was used in the audit of operating activities. |
|
| Reporting threshold |
We agreed with the Audit Committee that we would report to them misstatements identified during our audit above £0.3m as well as misstatements below that amount that, in our view, warranted reporting for qualitative reasons. |
| Parent company materiality | |
|---|---|
| Overall materiality | £9.3m |
| How we determined it |
1% of Parent Company total assets |
| Rationale for benchmark applied |
We determined materiality based on total assets given that NewRiver REIT plc is a holding company in the Group and the investment in subsidiaries is the key determinant of the Parent Company's value. |
| Performance materiality |
Performance materiality is set to reduce to an appropriately low level the probability that the aggregate of uncorrected and undetected misstatements in the financial statements exceeds materiality for the financial statements as a whole. |
| Based on this being our first-year audit of the Parent Company, together with our risk assessments and our assessment of the Parent Company's overall control environment we set performance materiality at £4.6m, which represents 50% of overall materiality. |
|
| Reporting threshold | We agreed with the directors that we would report to them misstatements identified during our audit above £0.3m as well as misstatements below that amount that, in our view, warranted reporting for qualitative reasons. |
As part of designing our audit, we assessed the risk of material misstatement in the financial statements, whether due to fraud or error, and then designed and performed audit procedures responsive to those risks. In particular, we looked at where the Directors made subjective judgments, such as assumptions on significant accounting estimated.
We tailored the scope of our audit to ensure that we performed sufficient work to be able to give an opinion on the financial statements as a whole. We used the outputs of our risk assessment, our understanding of the Group and the Parent Company, their environment, controls, and critical business processes, to consider qualitative factors to ensure that we obtained sufficient coverage across all financial statement line items.
Our Group audit scope included an audit of the Group and the Parent Company financial statements. Based on our risk assessment, the components that are subjected to a full-scope audit account for 99% of the Group's consolidated total assets, 92% of the Group's consolidated revenue and 99% of the Group's consolidated expenses. These components, including the Parent Company, were audited by the Group audit team. For the residual components, we performed specific procedures, including analytical review, testing of consolidation journals and intercompany eliminations, to respond to any potential risks of material misstatement of the Group financial statements.
At the Parent Company level, the Group audit team also tested the consolidation process and carried out analytical procedures to confirm our conclusion that there were no significant risks of material misstatement of the aggregated financial information.
Strategic Report
& Appendix
The other information comprises the information included in the Annual Report and Accounts other than the financial statements and our auditor's report thereon. The directors are responsible for the other information. Our opinion on the financial statements does not cover the other information and, except to the extent otherwise explicitly stated in our report, we do not express any form of assurance conclusion thereon.
Our responsibility is to read the other information and, in doing so, consider whether the other information is materially inconsistent with the financial statements or our knowledge obtained in the course of audit or otherwise appears to be materially misstated. If we identify such material inconsistencies or apparent material misstatements, we are required to determine whether this gives rise to a material misstatement in the financial statements themselves. If, based on the work we have performed, we conclude that there is a material misstatement of this other information, we are required to report that fact.
We have nothing to report in this regard.
In our opinion, the part of the Directors' remuneration report to be audited has been properly prepared in accordance with the Companies Act 2006.
In our opinion, based on the work undertaken in the course of the audit:
In light of the knowledge and understanding of the Group and the Parent Company and their environment obtained in the course of the audit, we have not identified material misstatements in the:
& Appendix
We have nothing to report in respect of the following matters in relation to which the Companies Act 2006 requires us to report to you if, in our opinion:
The Listing Rules require us to review the Directors' statement in relation to going concern, longer-term viability and that part of the Corporate Governance Statement relating to NewRiver REIT plc's compliance with the provisions of the UK Corporate Governance Statement specified for our review.
Based on the work undertaken as part of our audit, we have concluded that each of the following elements of the Corporate Governance Statement is materially consistent with the financial statements or our knowledge obtained during the audit:
As explained more fully in the Directors' responsibilities statement set out on page 160, the Directors are responsible for the preparation of the financial statements and for being satisfied that they give a true and fair view, and for such internal control as the Directors determine is necessary to enable the preparation of financial statements that are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error.
In preparing the financial statements, the Directors are responsible for assessing the Group's and the Parent Company's ability to continue as a going concern, disclosing, as applicable, matters related to going concern and using the going concern basis of accounting unless the Directors either intend to liquidate the Group or the Parent Company or to cease operations, or have no realistic alternative but to do so.
Our objectives are to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements as a whole are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error, and to issue an auditor's report that includes our opinion. Reasonable assurance is a high level of assurance but is not a guarantee that an audit conducted in accordance with ISAs (UK) will always detect a material misstatement when it exists. Misstatements can arise from fraud or error and are considered material if, individually or in the aggregate, they could reasonably be expected to influence the economic decisions of users taken on the basis of these financial statements.
The extent to which our procedures are capable of detecting irregularities, including fraud is detailed below.
Irregularities, including fraud, are instances of non-compliance with laws and regulations. We design procedures in line with our responsibilities, outlined above, to detect material misstatements in respect of irregularities, including fraud.
Based on our understanding of the Group and the Parent Company and their industry, we considered that non-compliance with the following laws and regulations might have a material effect on the financial statements including compliance with Real Estate Investment Trust (REIT) requirements, RICS Valuation – Professional Standards, employment regulation and anti-money laundering regulation.
To help us identify instances of non-compliance with these laws and regulations, and in identifying and assessing the risks of material misstatement in respect to non-compliance, our procedures included, but were not limited to:
& Appendix
We also considered those laws and regulations that have a direct effect on the preparation of the financial statements, such as the Listing Rules, UK Corporate Governance Code, Disclosure Guidance and Transparency Rules, UK Tax legislation, pension legislation and the Companies Act 2006.
In addition, we evaluated the Directors' and Management's incentives and opportunities for fraudulent manipulation of the financial statements, including the risk of management override of controls, and determined that the principal risks related to posting manual journal entries to manipulate financial performance, management bias through judgments and assumptions in significant accounting estimates, in particular in relation to valuation of investment properties, acquisition of C&R, impairment of investment in subsidiaries, revenue recognition (which we pinpointed to the accuracy and occurrence assertions), and significant one-off or unusual transactions.
Our procedures in relation to fraud included but were not limited to:
Company Information
NewRiver REIT plc | Annual Report and Accounts 2025 2025 Governance Report Financial Statements ESG Data Sets 168 Glossary & Strategic Report
& Appendix
Auditor's report continued
The primary responsibility for the prevention and detection of irregularities, including fraud, rests with both those charged with governance and management. As with any audit, there remained a risk of non-detection of irregularities, as these may involve collusion, forgery, intentional omissions, misrepresentations or the override of internal controls.
The risks of material misstatement that had the greatest effect on our audit are discussed in the "Key audit matters" section of this report.
A further description of our responsibilities is available on the Financial Reporting Council's website at www.frc.org.uk/auditorsresponsibilities. This description forms part of our auditor's report.
Following the recommendation of the Audit Committee, we were appointed by the shareholders on 5 August 2024 to audit the financial statements for the year ending 31 March 2025 and subsequent financial periods. The total uninterrupted engagement period is one year, covering the year ending 31 March 2025.
The non-audit services prohibited by the FRC's Ethical Standard were not provided to the Group or the Parent Company and we remain independent of the Group and the Parent Company in conducting our audit.
Our audit opinion is consistent with our additional report to the Audit Committee.
This report is made solely to the Company's members as a body in accordance with Chapter 3 of Part 16 of the Companies Act 2006. Our audit work has been undertaken so that we might state to the Company's members those matters we are required to state to them in an auditor's report and for no other purpose. To the fullest extent permitted by law, we do not accept or assume responsibility to anyone other than the Company and the Company's members as a body for our audit work, for this report, or for the opinions we have formed.
As required by the Financial Conduct Authority Disclosure Guidance and Transparency Rules, these financial statements will form part of the electronic reporting format prepared annual financial report filed on the National Storage Mechanism of the Financial Conduct Authority. This auditor's report provides no assurance over whether the annual financial report has been prepared using the correct electronic reporting format.
for and on behalf of Forvis Mazars LLP Chartered Accountants and Statutory Auditor
30 Old Bailey London EC4M 7AU
Date: 16 June 2025
Company Information
| Year ended 31 March 2025 | Year ended 31 March 2024 | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Notes | Operating and financing 2025 £m |
Fair value adjustments 2025 £m |
Total 2025 £m |
Operating and financing 2024 £m |
Fair value adjustments 2024 £m |
Total 2024 £m |
|
| Revenue | 4 | 90.5 | – | 90.5 | 65.0 | – | 65.0 |
| Property operating expenses* | 5 | (34.3) | – | (34.3) | (20.9) | – | (20.9) |
| Net property income | 56.2 | – | 56.2 | 44.1 | – | 44.1 | |
| Administrative expenses | 6 | (18.5) | – | (18.5) | (12.4) | – | (12.4) |
| Other income | 7 | – | – | – | 0.4 | – | 0.4 |
| Share of profit from joint ventures | 15 | – | – | – | 0.5 | – | 0.5 |
| Share of profit from associates | 16 | 0.2 | (0.1) | 0.1 | 0.3 | – | 0.3 |
| Net property valuation movement | 14 | – | 2.1 | 2.1 | – | (13.9) | (13.9) |
| Loss on disposal of joint venture | 8 | – | – | – | (2.3) | – | (2.3) |
| Loss on disposal of investment properties | 9 | (0.9) | – | (0.9) | (3.8) | – | (3.8) |
| Operating profit | 37.0 | 2.0 | 39.0 | 26.8 | (13.9) | 12.9 | |
| Finance income | 10 | 5.3 | – | 5.3 | 5.4 | – | 5.4 |
| Finance costs | 10 | (17.6) | – | (17.6) | (15.3) | – | (15.3) |
| Profit for the year before taxation | 24.7 | 2.0 | 26.7 | 16.9 | (13.9) | 3.0 | |
| Taxation | 11 | – | (3.0) | (3.0) | – | – | – |
| Profit for the year | 24.7 | (1.0) | 23.7 | 16.9 | (13.9) | 3.0 | |
| Total comprehensive profit for the year | 23.7 | 3.0 | |||||
| There are no items of other comprehensive income for the current or prior | |||||||
| year | |||||||
| Earnings per share | |||||||
| Basic (pence) | 12 | 6.3 | 1.0 | ||||
| Diluted (pence) | 12 | 6.3 | 1.0 |
* Included in property operating expenses is an expected credit loss reversal of £0.3 million (2024: £nil) relating to trade receivables.
The notes on pages 173 to 196 form an integral part of these financial statements.
| Notes | 2025 £m |
2024 £m |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Non-current assets | |||
| Investment properties | 14 | 939.0 | 608.7 |
| Right of use asset | 22 | 18.1 | 0.7 |
| Investments in joint ventures | 15 | – | 0.1 |
| Investments in associates | 16 | 5.3 | 5.6 |
| Property, plant and equipment | 3.8 | 0.3 | |
| Goodwill | 17 | 3.6 | – |
| Intangible asset | 17 | 0.9 | – |
| Total non-current assets | 970.7 | 615.4 | |
| Current assets | |||
| Trade and other receivables | 18 | 22.1 | 11.4 |
| Cash and cash equivalents | 19 | 61.3 | 132.8 |
| Total current assets | 83.4 | 144.2 | |
| Total assets | 1,054.1 | 759.6 | |
| Equity and liabilities | |||
| Current liabilities | |||
| Trade and other payables | 20 | 53.4 | 26.3 |
| Lease liability | 22 | 1.8 | 0.4 |
| Total current liabilities | 55.2 | 26.7 | |
| Non-current liabilities | |||
| Lease liability | 22 | 71.8 | 75.2 |
| Borrowings | 21 | 437.0 | 296.6 |
| Total non-current liabilities | 508.8 | 371.8 | |
| Net assets | 490.1 | 361.1 |
| 2025 | 2024 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Notes | £m | £m | |
| Equity | |||
| Share capital | 23 | 4.7 | 3.1 |
| Share premium | 23 | 53.9 | 4.0 |
| Merger reserve | 23 | 74.3 | (2.3) |
| Investment in own shares | 23 | (1.4) | (3.0) |
| Retained earnings | 23 | 358.6 | 359.3 |
| Total equity | 490.1 | 361.1 | |
| Net Asset Value (NAV) per share (pence) | |||
| Basic | 12 | 103p | 116p |
| Diluted | 12 | 102p | 115p |
| EPRA NTA | 12 | 102p | 115p |
& Appendix
The notes on pages 173 to 196 form an integral part of these financial statements.
The financial statements on pages 169 to 172 were approved by the Board of Directors on 16 June 2025 and were signed on its behalf by:
Chief Executive Officer
Registered number: 10221027
Chief Financial Officer
Company Information
NewRiver REIT plc | Annual Report and Accounts 2025 2025 Governance Report Financial Statements ESG Data Sets 171 Glossary & Strategic Report
& Appendix
| Notes | 2025 £m |
2024 £m |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Cash flows from operating activities | |||
| Profit for the year before taxation | 26.7 | 3.0 | |
| Adjustments for: | |||
| Loss on disposal of investment property | 9 | 0.9 | 3.8 |
| Net valuation movement | 14 | (2.1) | 13.9 |
| Net valuation movement in associates | 16 | 0.1 | – |
| Share of profit from joint ventures | – | (0.5) | |
| Share of profit from associates | 16 | (0.2) | (0.3) |
| Loss on disposal of joint venture | – | 2.3 | |
| Net interest expense | 10 | 12.3 | 9.9 |
| Rent free lease incentives | (0.6) | 0.1 | |
| Movement in expected credit loss | 5 | (0.3) | – |
| Capitalisation of legal and letting fees | (0.3) | (0.3) | |
| Amortisation of intangible assets | 0.3 | – | |
| Depreciation on property plant and equipment | 1.1 | 0.3 | |
| Share-based payment expense | 1.2 | 1.5 | |
| Cash generated from operations before changes in working capital | 39.1 | 33.7 |
| Notes | 2025 £m |
2024 £m |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Changes in working capital | |||
| Decrease in trade and other receivables | 1.6 | 1.1 | |
| Decrease in payables and other financial liabilities | (1.0) | (3.1) | |
| Cash generated from operations | 39.7 | 31.7 | |
| Interest paid | (17.5) | (15.1) | |
| Interest income | 5.8 | 5.0 | |
| Dividends received from joint ventures | – | 0.9 | |
| Dividends received from associates | 16 | 0.4 | 0.2 |
| Net cash generated from operating activities | 28.4 | 22.7 | |
| Cash flows from investing activities | |||
| Return of investment from associate | (0.1) | – | |
| Disposal proceeds from joint venture | 0.1 | 21.0 | |
| Disposal of investment properties | 3.0 | 8.7 | |
| Capital expenditure | 14 | (9.7) | (6.1) |
| Cash paid for Capital & Regional acquisition, including | |||
| transaction costs | 17 | (81.8) | – |
| Cash acquired Capital & Regional acquisition | 17 | 25.8 | – |
| Acquisition of subsidiaries, net of cash acquired | (5.1) | – | |
| Net cash (used in) / generated from investing activities | (67.8) | 23.6 | |
| Cash flows from financing activities | |||
| Repayment of principal portion of lease liability | (1.0) | (0.4) | |
| Purchase of own shares | – | (3.0) | |
| Loan repayment | 25 | (58.0) | – |
| Equity placing and retail offer, net of issue costs | 23 | 48.7 | – |
| Dividends paid – ordinary | (21.8) | (18.7) | |
| Net cash used in financing activities | (32.1) | (22.1) | |
| Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of the year | 132.8 | 108.6 | |
| Net (decrease) / increase in cash and cash equivalents | (71.5) | 24.2 | |
| Cash and cash equivalents at 31 March | 61.3 | 132.8 |
The notes on pages 173 to 196 form an integral part of these financial statements.
Company Information
Company Information
| Investment in | Retained | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Share capital | Share premium | Merger reserve | own shares | earnings | Total | ||
| Notes | £m | £m | £m | £m | £m | £m | |
| As at 1 April 2023 | 3.1 | 2.4 | (2.3) | – | 375.4 | 378.6 | |
| Profit for the year after taxation | – | – | – | – | 3.0 | 3.0 | |
| Total comprehensive profit for the year after taxation | – | – | – | – | 3.0 | 3.0 | |
| Transactions with equity holders | |||||||
| Issue of new shares | – | 1.6 | – | – | – | 1.6 | |
| Purchase of own shares | 23 | – | – | – | (3.0) | – | (3.0) |
| Share-based payments | 24 | – | – | – | – | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Dividends paid | 13 | – | – | – | – | (20.3) | (20.3) |
| As at 31 March 2024 | 3.1 | 4.0 | (2.3) | (3.0) | 359.3 | 361.1 | |
| Profit for the year after taxation | – | – | – | – | 23.7 | 23.7 | |
| Total comprehensive profit for the year after taxation | – | – | – | – | 23.7 | 23.7 | |
| Transactions with equity holders | |||||||
| Issue of new shares | – | 1.8 | – | – | – | 1.8 | |
| Equity placing and retail offer | 23 | 0.6 | 48.1 | – | – | – | 48.7 |
| Share-based payments | 24 | – | – | – | 1.6 | (0.4) | 1.2 |
| Consideration shares | 23 | 1.0 | – | 76.6 | – | – | 77.6 |
| Dividends paid | 13 | – | – | – | – | (24.0) | (24.0) |
| As at 31 March 2025 | 4.7 | 53.9 | 74.3 | (1.4) | 358.6 | 490.1 |
The notes on pages 173 to 196 form an integral part of these financial statements.
Strategic Report
NewRiver REIT plc (the 'Company') and its subsidiaries (together the 'Group') is a property investment group specialising in commercial real estate in the UK. The Company is registered and domiciled in the UK and the registered office of the Company is 89 Whitfield Street, London, W1T 4DE.
The principal accounting policies applied in the preparation of these consolidated financial statements are set out below. These policies have been consistently applied to all years presented.
These consolidated financial statements have been prepared on the going concern basis, in accordance with the Disclosure and Transparency Rules of the Financial Conduct Authority, in accordance with UK-adopted International Accounting Standards and within the requirements of the Companies Act 2006.
The Group's going concern assessment considers the Group's principal risks, budgets and forecasts and is dependent on a number of factors, including cashflow and liquidity, continued access to borrowing facilities and the ability to continue to operate the Group's debt structure within its financial covenants. Further details are provided in the Viability Statement on page 109. The Group's balance sheet is predominantly unsecured, which means that the majority of its debt is not secured against any of its property assets – a structure that affords significant operational flexibility.
The principal debt currently drawn by the Group is the £300 million unsecured corporate bond which matures in March 2028. This bond has financial covenants that the Group is required to comply with including an LTV covenant of less than 65% and a 12 month historical interest cover ratio of more than 1.5x.
The only other debt currently drawn by the Group is the single facility that we retained following the acquisition of Capital & Regional in December 2024, the £140 million "Mall" facility secured against three of the assets acquired as part of the Capital & Regional transaction with a coupon of 3.45% and which matures in January 2027. As available cash and liquidity both currently and throughout the assessment period (see below) is such that this secured loan can either be repaid in full and/or any requisite cure funded at any point, our Going Concern assessment focuses on the covenants attached to the unsecured corporate bond outlined above.
The going concern assessment is based on an at least 12 month outlook from the date of the approval of these financial statements, using the Group's Board approved budget for FY26, flexed to create a reasonable worst case scenario, which includes the key assumptions listed below.
• Capital values to decrease a further 5% during FY26 and remain flat throughout the remainder of the forecast horizon, in contrast to the modest growth of +0.6% across the portfolio in FY25, but importantly including +0.6% growth in our Core Shopping Centres and +1.7% in our Retail Parks in the six months to 31 March 2025, which represent 94% of our Portfolio looking forwards;
& Appendix
Glossary & Company Information
Under this scenario, the Group is forecast to maintain sufficient cash and liquidity resources and remain compliant with its financial covenants over the going concern period. Further stress testing was performed on this scenario which demonstrated that the Group could absorb a further valuation decline of 27% or a further 54% reduction in annual net rental income before breaching applicable debt covenant levels referenced above. The Group maintains sufficient cash and liquidity reserves to continue in operation and pay its liabilities as they fall due throughout the going concern assessment period and as such the Directors conclude a going concern basis of preparation is appropriate.
The Group has reported the cash flows from operating activities using the indirect method. The acquisition of properties are presented within investing cash flows and interest paid and interest received is presented within operating cash flows because this most appropriately reflects the Group's business activities.
The consolidated financial statements incorporate the financial statements of the Company and its subsidiaries controlled by the Company, made up to 31 March each year. Control is achieved when the Company is exposed, or has rights, to variable returns from its involvement with the entity and has the ability to affect those returns through its power over the investee.
The consolidated financial statements account for interest in joint ventures and associates using the equity method of accounting per IFRS 11 and IAS 28 respectively. The financial statements for the year ended 31 March 2025 have been prepared on the historical cost basis, except for the revaluation of investment properties.

The Group applies the acquisition method to account for business combinations. The cost of the acquisition is measured at the aggregate of the fair values, at the date of completion, of assets given, liabilities incurred or assumed, and equity instruments issued by the Group in exchange for control of the acquired. The acquiree's identifiable assets, liabilities and contingent liabilities that meet the conditions for recognition under IFRS are recognised at their fair value at the acquisition.
Any excess of the purchase price of business combinations over the fair value of the assets, liabilities and contingent liabilities acquired is recognised as goodwill. This is recognised as an asset and is reviewed for impairment at least annually. Any impairment is recognised immediately in the statement of comprehensive income. Where the fair value of the consideration is less than the fair value of the identifiable assets and liabilities then the difference is recognised as a bargain purchase in the statement of comprehensive income.
Under the acquisition accounting method, the identifiable assets, liabilities and contingent liabilities acquired are measured at fair value at the acquisition date. The consideration transferred is measured at fair value and includes the fair value of any contingent consideration. Where properties are acquired through corporate acquisitions, each transaction is considered by management in light of the substance of the acquisition to determine whether the acquisition is a business combination or an asset acquisition.
Management consider whether each acquisition constitutes a business combination or an asset acquisition and have chosen to apply the optional concentration test that, if met, eliminates the need for further assessment. Management have chosen to take the optional concentration test which considers whether substantially all of the fair value of the gross assets acquired is concentrated in a single asset group. The acquired assets and assumed liabilities have been recognised in accordance with the relevant accounting requirements. The costs of the acquisition are allocated to identifiable assets and liabilities based on their relative fair values at the purchase date. Directly attributable acquisition related costs are capitalised as part of the cost of the assets acquired. These costs are presented as part of financing cash flows in the cast flow statement.
The Group has adopted the following amendments for the first time in the year ended 31 March 2025:
Adopting these amendments has not impacted amounts recognised in prior periods or are expected to have a material impact on the current period or future periods based on the Group's current strategy. The accounting policies used are otherwise consistent with those contained in the Group's previous Annual Report and Accounts for the year ended 31 March 2024, unless otherwise stated.
A number of new amendments have been issued but are not yet effective for the current accounting period.
Effective after 1 April 2025;
No material impact is expected upon the adoption of these standards.
Property, rental and related income from fixed and minimum guaranteed rent reviews is recognised on a straight-line basis over the entire lease term. Where such rental income is recognised ahead of the related cash flow, an adjustment is made to ensure the carrying value of the related property including the accrued rent does not exceed the external valuation. Initial direct costs incurred in negotiating and arranging a new lease are amortised on a straight-line basis over the period from the date of lease commencement to the expiry date of the lease.
Where a rent-free period is included in a lease, this is recognised over the lease term, on a straightline basis, as a reduction of rental income.
Where a lease incentive payment or surrender premiums are paid to enhance the value of a property, these are amortised on a straight-line basis over the period from the date of lease commencement to the expiry date of the lease as a reduction of rental income. It is management's policy to recognise all material lease incentives and lease incentives greater than six months. Upon receipt of a surrender premium for the early determination of a lease, the profit, net of dilapidations and non-recoverable outgoings relating to the lease concerned, is accounted for from the effective date of the modification, being the date at which both parties agree to the modification, considering any prepaid or accrued lease payments relating to the original lease as part of the lease payments for the new lease.

Service charge income is recognised in accordance with IFRS 15. This income stream is recognised in the period which it is earnt and when performance obligations are satisfied e.g. when the service charges are incurred.
IFRS 15 is based on the principle that revenue is recognised when control passes to a customer. The majority of the Group's income is from tenant leases and is therefore outside of the scope of IFRS 15. However, the standard applies to service charge income. Under IFRS 15, the Group needs to consider the agent versus principal guidance. The Group is principal in the transaction if they control the specified goods or services before they are transferred to the customer. In the provision of service charge, the Group has deemed itself to be principal and therefore the consolidated statement of comprehensive income and the consolidated balance sheet reflect service charge income, expenses, trade and other receivables and trade and other payables.
Management fees are recognised in the consolidated statement of comprehensive income as the services are delivered and performance obligations met. The Group assesses whether the individual elements of service in the agreement are separate performance obligations. Asset management fees are recognised over the period the respective services are provided.
Snozone income is recognised in accordance with IFRS 15. Snozone income is recognised at the point in time when the customer has completed the use of the skiing services provided.
Car park income is recognised in accordance with IFRS 15. Car park income is recognised at the point in time when the customer has completed use of their car parking space.
The Group is contractually entitled to receive a promote payment should the returns from a joint venture or associate to the joint venture or associate partner exceed a certain internal rate of return. This payment is only receivable by the Group on disposal of underlying properties held by the joint venture or associate or other termination events. Any entitlements under these arrangements are only accrued for in the financial statements once the Group believes the above performance conditions have been met and there is no risk of the revenue reversing.
All revenue streams under IFRS 15 allocate transaction price against performance obligations as they are satisfied. With the exception of asset management fees, IFRS 15 revenue streams do not carry variable consideration. There are no significant judgements in applying IFRS 15. There are no significant payment terms on any of the IFRS 15 revenue streams.
Service charge expenses are recognised in the period in which they are incurred.
Finance income and costs excluding fair value derivative movements, are recognised using the effective interest rate method. The effective interest rate method is a method of calculating the amortised cost of a financial asset or financial liability and of allocating the interest income or interest expense over the relevant period. The effective interest rate is the rate that discounts estimated future cash payments or receipts throughout the expected life of the financial instrument, or a shorter period where appropriate, to the net carrying amount of the financial asset or financial liability.
The current income tax charge is calculated on the basis of the tax laws enacted or substantively enacted at the date of the balance sheet. Tax is recognised in the consolidated statement of comprehensive income.
Any deferred tax provided is based on the expected manner of realisation or settlement of the carrying amount of assets and liabilities, using tax rates that are expected to apply in the period when the liability is settled or the asset is realised. A deferred tax asset is recognised only to the extent that it is probable that future taxable profits will be available against which the asset can be utilised.
These properties include completed properties that are generating rent or are available for rent. Investment properties comprise freehold and leasehold properties and are first measured at cost (including transaction costs), then revalued to market value at each reporting date by independent professional valuers. Leasehold properties are accounted for as right-of-use assets within investment property under IFRS 16, see Leases accounting policy. Valuation gains and losses in a period are taken to the consolidated statement of comprehensive income. As the Group uses the fair value model, as per IAS 40 Investment Properties, no depreciation is provided. An asset will be classified as held for sale within investment properties, in line with IFRS 5 Non-Current Assets Held for Sale and Discontinued Operations, where the asset is available for immediate sale in its present condition and the sale is highly probable.
Fixtures and equipment are stated at cost less accumulated depreciation and any recognised impairment loss. Depreciation is recognised over the useful lives of the equipment, using the straight-line method at a rate of between 10% to 25% depending on the useful life.
Depreciation is recognised so as to write off the cost or valuation of assets less their residual values over their useful lives on the following bases:
PPE is stated at cost net of depreciation and any provision for impairment. Cost includes the original purchase price of the asset and the costs attributable to bringing the asset to its working condition for its intended use. Depreciation is provided so as to write off the cost of the assets, less their estimated residual values, on a straight-line basis over their expected useful lives, which are given below as a general rule, however as part of the day to day running of the business there may be some assets which fall outside of this, these assets are treated the same and are always depreciated on a straight-line basis over their expected useful lives.
The expected useful lives and depreciation methods are reviewed annually at each reporting date. Subsequent costs incurred after the initial recognition of PPE are capitalised if they meet the recognition criteria. Such costs include expenditures that increase the future economic benefits expected to be obtained from the use of the asset beyond its originally assessed standard of performance. Upon disposal of PPE, any resulting gain or loss is calculated as the difference between the net disposal proceeds and the carrying amount of the asset in the financial statements at the date of disposal. Gains or losses on disposals are recognised in profit or loss in the period in which the disposal occurs.
Interests in joint ventures are accounted for using the equity method of accounting. The Group's joint ventures are entities over which the Group has joint control with a partner. Investments in joint ventures are carried in the consolidated balance sheet at cost as adjusted by post-acquisition changes in the Group's share of the net assets of the joint venture, less any impairment or share of income adjusted for dividends. In assessing whether a particular entity is controlled, the Group considers all of the contractual terms of the arrangement, whether it has the power to govern the financial and operating policies of the joint venture so as to obtain benefits from its activities, and the existence of any legal disputes or challenges to this joint control in order to conclude whether the Group jointly controls the joint venture.
Interests in associates are accounted for using the equity method of accounting. The Group's associates are entities over which the Group has significant influence with a partner. Investments in associates are carried in the consolidated balance sheet at cost as adjusted by post-acquisition changes in the Group's share of the net assets of the associates, less any impairment or share of income adjusted for dividends. In assessing whether a particular entity is controlled or has significant influence, the Group considers all of the contractual terms of the arrangement, whether it has the power to govern the financial and operating policies of the associate so as to obtain benefits from its activities.
At inception, the Group assesses whether a contract is or contains a lease. This assessment involves the exercise of judgement about whether the Group obtains substantially all the economic benefits from the use of that asset, and whether the Group has the right to direct the use of the asset.
The Group recognises a right-of-use ("ROU") asset and the lease liability at the commencement date of the lease. The ROU asset is initially measured based on the present value of lease payments, plus initial direct costs and the cost of obligations to restore the asset, less any incentives received.
Lease payments generally include fixed payments and variable payments that depend on an index (such as an inflation index).
Each lease payment is allocated between the liability and finance cost. The lease payments are discounted using the interest rate implicit in the lease if that rate can be readily determined or if not, the incremental borrowing rate is used. The finance cost is charged to profit or loss over the lease period so as to produce a constant rate of interest on the remaining balance of the liability for each period.
The ROU asset is depreciated over the shorter of the lease term or the useful life of the underlying asset. The ROU asset is subject to testing for impairment if there is an indicator of impairment. ROU assets that are not classified as investment properties are disclosed on the face of the consolidated balance sheet on their own line, and the lease liability included in the headings current and non-current liabilities on the consolidated balance sheet.
The Group remeasures the lease liability (and makes a corresponding adjustment to the related right-of-use asset) whenever:

Where the ROU asset relates to leases of land or property that meets the definition of investment property under IAS 40 it has been disclosed within the investment property balance. After initial recognition, IAS 40 requires the amount of the recognised lease liability, calculated in accordance with IFRS 16, to be added back to the amount determined under the net valuation model, to arrive at the carrying amount of the investment property under the fair value model. Differences between the ROU asset and associated lease liability are taken to the consolidated statement of comprehensive income.
The Group has elected not to recognise ROU assets and liabilities for leases where the total lease term is less than or equal to 12 months, or for low value leases of less than £3,000. The payments for such leases are recognised in the consolidated statement of comprehensive income on a straight-line basis over the lease term.
The Group accounts for all leases as operating leases, please see revenue recognition for further details.
The Group classifies its financial assets as fair value through profit or loss or amortised cost, depending on the purpose for which the asset was acquired and based on the business model test. Financial assets carried at amortised cost include tenant receivables which arise from the provision of goods and services to customers. These are initially recognised at fair value plus transaction costs that are directly attributable to their acquisition or issue and are subsequently carried at amortised cost, less provision for impairment. Impairment provisions for receivables are recognised based on the simplified approach within IFRS 9 using a provision matrix in the determination of the lifetime expected credit losses. The probability of tenant default and subsequent non-payment of the receivable is assessed. If it is determined that the receivable will not be collectable, the gross carrying value of the asset is written off against the associated provision. If in a subsequent year the amount of the impairment loss decreased and the decrease can be related objectively to an event occurring after the impairment was recognised, the previously recognised impairment loss is reversed to the extent that the carrying value of the asset does not exceed its amortised costs at the reversal date. The Group's financial assets measured at amortised cost comprise trade and other receivables and cash and cash equivalents.
Financial assets are derecognised only when the contractual rights to the cash flows from the financial asset expire or the Group transfers substantially all risks and rewards of ownership.
Cash and cash equivalents include cash on hand, cash in transit, deposits held on call with financial institutions, other short-term, highly liquid investments with original maturities of three months or less that are readily convertible into known amounts of cash and which are subject to an insignificant risk of change in value.
The Group classifies its financial liabilities at amortised cost. A financial liability is derecognised when the obligation under the liability is discharged or cancelled or expires.
All loans and borrowings are classified as other liabilities. Initial recognition is at fair value less directly attributable transaction costs. After initial recognition, interest bearing loans and borrowings are subsequently measured at amortised costs using the effective interest method.
Financial liabilities included in trade and other payables are recognised initially at fair value and subsequently at amortised cost.
The financial instruments classified as financial liabilities at fair value through profit or loss include interest rate swap and cap arrangements. Recognition of the derivative financial instruments takes place when the contracts are entered into. They are recognised at fair value and transaction costs are included directly in finance costs.
The fair value of a non-interest bearing liability is its discounted repayment amount. If the due date of the liability is less than one year, discounting is omitted.
Revenues, expenses and assets are recognised net of the amount of value added tax except:
Where the value added tax incurred on a purchase of assets or services is not recoverable from the taxation authority, in which case the value added tax is recognised as part of the cost of acquisition of the asset or as part of the expense item as applicable; and receivables and payables that are stated with the amount of value added tax included. The net amount of value added tax recoverable from, or payable to, the taxation authority is included as part of receivables or payables in the consolidated balance sheet.
Shares are classified as equity when there is no obligation to transfer cash or other assets. The cost of issuing share capital is recognised directly in equity against the proceeds from issuing the shares.
The cost of equity settled transactions is measured with reference to the fair value at the date at which they were granted. Where vesting performance conditions are non-market based, the fair value excludes the effect of these vesting conditions and an estimate is made at each year end date of the number of instruments expected to vest. The fair value is recognised over the vesting period in the consolidated statement of comprehensive income, with a corresponding increase in equity. Any change to the number of instruments with non-market vesting conditions expected to vest is recognised in the consolidated statement of comprehensive income for that period.
The Group operates an Employee Benefit Trust for the exclusive benefit of the Group's employees. The investment in the Company's shares held by the trust is recognised at cost and deducted from equity. No gain or loss is recognised in the consolidated statement of comprehensive income on the purchase, sale, issue or cancellation of the shares held by the trust.
Dividends to the Company's shareholders are recognised when they become legally payable. In the case of interim dividends, this is when paid. In the case of final dividends, this is when approved by equity holders.

Transactions in foreign currencies are translated into sterling at exchange rates approximating to the exchange rate ruling at the date of the transaction. Monetary assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies at the balance sheet date are translated to sterling at the exchange rate ruling at that date and differences arising on translation are recognised in the income statement.
The assets and liabilities of foreign operations, including goodwill and fair value adjustments arising on consolidation, are translated into sterling at the exchange rates ruling at the balance sheet date. The operating income and expenses of foreign operations are translated into sterling at the average exchange rates for the year. Significant transactions, such as property sales, are translated at the foreign exchange rate ruling at the date of each transaction. The principal exchange rate used to translate foreign currency denominated amounts in the balance sheet is the rate at the end of the year: £1 = €1.1951 (2024: No foreign exchange transactions). The principal exchange rate used for the income statement is the average rate since the acquisition of Capital & Regional on 10 December 2024: £1 = €1.1988 (2024: No foreign exchange transactions). Foreign exchange gains and losses from monetary assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies are recognised in profit or loss at each reporting date. Non-monetary items are translated at the exchange rate prevailing at the transaction date, with subsequent changes in exchange rates not affecting gains or losses
The preparation of financial statements requires management to make estimates and judgements affecting the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, of revenues and expenses, and of gains and losses. The key assumptions concerning the future, and other key sources of estimation uncertainty at the end of the reporting period, that have a significant risk of causing a material adjustment to the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities within the next financial year, are discussed below. Estimates and judgements are continually evaluated and are based on historical experience as adjusted for current market conditions and other factors.
NewRiver is a Real Estate Investment Trust (REIT) and does not pay tax on its property income or gains on property sales, provided that at least 90% of the Group's property income is distributed as a dividend to shareholders, which becomes taxable in their hands. In addition, the Group has to meet certain conditions such as ensuring the property rental business represents more than 75% of total profits and assets. Any potential or proposed changes to the REIT legislation are monitored and discussed with HMRC. It is the Directors judgement that the Group has met the REIT conditions in the year.
Management consider whether each acquisition constitutes a business combination or an asset acquisition in relation to the acquisition of Capital & Regional in December 2024. Management have chosen to take the optional concentration test to assess whether substantially all of the fair value of the gross assets acquired is concentrated in a single asset group and have determined that the test is met. Therefore the acquired assets and assumed liabilities have been recognised in accordance with the relevant accounting requirements rather than IFRS 3 Business Combinations. The costs of the acquisition are allocated to identifiable assets and liabilities based on their relative fair values at the purchase date. Directly attributable acquisition related costs are capitalised as part of the cost of the assets acquired. These costs are presented as part of financing cash flows in the cast flow statement.
The Group's investment properties are stated at fair value. The assumptions and estimates used to value the properties are detailed in note 14. Small changes in the key estimates, such as yield and the estimated rental value, can have a significant impact on the valuation of the investment properties, and therefore a significant impact on the consolidated balance sheet and key performance measures such as Net Tangible Assets per share.
Rents and ERVs have a direct relationship to valuation, while yield has an inverse relationship. There are interrelationships between all these unobservable inputs as they are determined by market conditions. The existence of an increase in more than one unobservable input could be to magnify the impact on the valuation, see note 14 for sensitivity analysis.
The estimated fair value may differ from the price at which the Group's assets could be sold. Actual realisation of net assets could differ from the valuation used in these financial statements, and the difference could be significant.
Management must assess whether the acquisition of property through the purchase of a corporate vehicle should be accounted for as an asset purchase or a business combination under IFRS 3. There is a risk that an inappropriate approach could lead to a misstatement in the financial statements. Management applied judgement to two corporate acquisitions made during the year to 31 March 2025 and determined the following:
• Ellandi
On 3 July 2024, the Group acquired Ellandi Management Limited ('Ellandi'), an asset and development management business focused on UK retail and regeneration (see note 17). It was determined that a business had been acquired and as such the transaction would be accounted for as a business combination under IFRS 3. Business combinations are accounted for using the acquisition method and any excess of the purchase consideration over the fair value of the net assets acquired is recognised as goodwill and if the fair value of the net asset assets is deemed to be higher than the purchase consideration then this is recognised as a bargain purchase.
• Capital & Regional
On 10 December 2024, the Group acquired Capital & Regional plc. it was determined by management that this was an asset acquisition rather than a business combination, see note 17.
In the prior year (year ended 31 March 2024) the Group had one identifiable segment, owned retail. The Group acquired Ellandi in July 2024 in order to enhance the capital partnerships division of the business. The acquisition added 16 asset management mandates taking the Group's total to 39 asset management mandates. Following on from the acquisition, the Group identified two operating segments, being Owned Retail and Capital Partnerships. The Board reviews the results of these two segments separately and the prior period comparative has been provided under the new basis below. The Owned Retail investments comprise shopping centres, retail parks and high street stores and Capital Partnerships comprise of income earnt through asset management mandates. The Group acquired Capital & Regional plc in December 2024 and identified a new operating segment, Snozone. Although Snozone has one site in Spain, the majority of the Group's operations are in the UK and therefore no geographical segments have been identified.
The relevant revenue and expenses used by the Board are set out below. The results include the Group's share of assets and results from properties held in associates.
The comparative information for the year ended 31 March 2024 have been restated to align with the basis of presentation for the year ended 31 March 2025.
| Year ended 31 March 2025 | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Segment result | Owned Retail £m |
Capital Partnerships £m |
Snozone £m |
Group £m |
Adjustments £m |
IFRS (Operating and financing) £m |
| Revenue | 76.7 | 2.9 | – | 79.6 | 10.9 | 90.5 |
| Property operating costs | (29.2) | – | – | (29.2) | (5.1) | (34.3) |
| Net property income | 47.5 | 2.9 | – | 50.4 | 5.8 | 56.2 |
| Administrative expenses | (11.6) | – | – | (11.6) | (6.9) | (18.5) |
| Other income | – | – | 3.7 | 3.7 | (3.7) | – |
| Operating profit | 35.9 | 2.9 | 3.7 | 42.5 | (4.8) | 37.7 |
| Net finance costs | (11.9) | – | – | (11.9) | (0.4) | (12.3) |
| Taxation | (0.1) | – | – | (0.1) | 0.1 | – |
| Segment result (Underlying Funds From Operations) |
23.9 | 2.9 | 3.7 | 30.5 |
For an explanation of the nature of the adjustments in 2025 please refer to page 53.
| Year ended 31 March 2024 | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Segment result | Owned Retail £m |
Capital Partnerships £m |
Snozone £m |
Group £m |
Adjustments £m |
IFRS (Operating and financing) £m |
||
| Revenue | 64.0 | 2.5 | – | 66.5 | (1.5) | 65.0 | ||
| Property operating costs | (20.9) | – | – | (20.9) | – | (20.9) | ||
| Net property income | 43.1 | 2.5 | – | 45.6 | (1.5) | 44.1 | ||
| Administrative expenses | (11.0) | – | – | (11.0) | (1.4) | (12.4) | ||
| Other income | 0.4 | – | – | 0.4 | – | 0.4 | ||
| Operating profit | 32.5 | 2.5 | – | 35.0 | (2.9) | 32.1 | ||
| Net finance costs | (10.6) | – | – | (10.6) | 0.7 | (9.9) | ||
| Segment result | ||||||||
| (Underlying Funds | ||||||||
| From Operations) | 21.9 | 2.5 | – | 24.4 |
* Adjustments to remove JV & Associates figures and non-cash and non-recurring items, principally sharebased payment charge £(1.5) million and revaluation of derivatives £0.1 million.
| 2025 £m |
2024 £m |
|
|---|---|---|
| UK | 88.1 | 65.0 |
| Spain | 2.4 | – |
| Revenue | 90.5 | 65.0 |
| 2025 £m |
2024 £m |
|
|---|---|---|
| UK | 968.2 | 615.4 |
| Spain | 1.5 | – |
| Non-current assets | 969.7 | 615.4 |

| 2025 £m |
2024 £m |
|
|---|---|---|
| Property rental and related income1 | 59.2 | 50.7 |
| Surrender premiums and commissions | 0.6 | 0.7 |
| Rental related income | 59.8 | 51.4 |
| Asset management fees2 | 6.2 | 2.5 |
| Service charge income | 16.1 | 11.1 |
| Snozone income | 8.4 | – |
| Revenue | 90.5 | 65.0 |
Included within property rental and related income is car park income of £7.0 million (2024: £5.4 million) which falls under the scope of IFRS 15. The remainder of the income is recognised by IFRS 16
Asset management fees include £0.2 million non-recurring fee income included in costs to unlock in relation to unlocking expected net cost synergies following the acquisition of Capital & Regional e.g. redundancy and head office costs
Asset management fees and service charge income which represents the flow through costs of the day-to-day maintenance of shopping centres fall under the scope of IFRS 15.
| 2025 £m |
2024 £m |
|---|---|
| 21.7 | 15.1 |
| 1.8 | 1.7 |
| (0.3) | – |
| 5.9 | 4.1 |
| 5.2 | – |
| 34.3 | 20.9 |
| 2025 £m |
2024 £m |
|
|---|---|---|
| Wages and salaries | 8.9 | 5.6 |
| Social security costs | 1.2 | 0.9 |
| Other pension costs | 0.3 | 0.1 |
| Staff costs | 10.4 | 6.6 |
| Depreciation1 | 0.5 | 0.3 |
| Share-based payments | 1.5 | 1.5 |
| Exceptional costs2 | 0.7 | – |
| Amortisation of intangibles3 | 0.3 | – |
| Costs to unlock4 | 1.3 | – |
| Other administrative expenses | 3.8 | 4.0 |
| Administrative expenses | 18.5 | 12.4 |
Depreciation is inclusive of £0.2 million (2024: £0.2 million) of right of use asset depreciation
Exceptional costs comprise expenses relating to the acquisition of Ellandi
Amortisation of intangibles relates to the amortisation of the intangible asset recognised on the acquisition of Ellandi
Costs to unlock comprise net costs in relation to unlocking expected net cost synergies following the acquisition of Capital & Regional

| 2025 £m |
2024 £m |
|
|---|---|---|
| Administrative expenses | 18.5 | 12.4 |
| Adjust for: | ||
| Asset management fees | (6.2) | (2.5) |
| Share of joint ventures' and associates administrative expenses | – | 0.1 |
| Share based payments | (1.5) | (1.5) |
| Exceptional costs1 | (0.7) | – |
| Amortisation of intangibles2 | (0.3) | – |
| Costs to unlock3 | (1.1) | – |
| Group's share of net administrative expenses | 8.7 | 8.5 |
| Property rental and related income4 | 61.1 | 52.3 |
| Other income | – | 0.4 |
| Share of joint ventures' and associates' property income | 0.6 | 1.5 |
| Property rental, other income and related income | 61.7 | 54.2 |
| Net administrative expenses as a % of property income (including share of | ||
| joint ventures and associates) | 14.1% | 15.7% |
Exceptional costs comprise expenses relating to the acquisition of Ellandi
Amortisation of intangibles relates to the amortisation of the intangible asset recognised on the acquisition of Ellandi
Costs to unlock comprise net costs in relation to unlocking expected net cost synergies following the acquisition of Capital & Regional e.g. redundancy and head office costs
This balance excludes the amortisation of tenant incentives and letting costs of £1.5 million (2024: £1.5 million) and includes an expected credit loss reversal of £0.4 million (2024: £nil), which excludes the £0.1 million expected credit loss (2024: £nil) forward looking element of the calculation.
| 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|
| Directors | 7 | 7 |
| Operations and asset managers | 39 | 18 |
| Support functions | 40 | 27 |
| Snozone* | 213 | – |
| Total | 299 | 52 |
* Adjusted for full time equivalents.
| 2025 £m |
2024 £m |
|
|---|---|---|
| Audit of the Company and consolidated financial statements | 0.8 | 0.3 |
| Audit of subsidiaries, pursuant to legislation | 0.2 | 0.2 |
| 1.0 | 0.5 | |
| Non-audit fees – interim review | 0.1 | 0.1 |
| Total fees | 1.1 | 0.6 |
Total fees include £0.5 million payable by Capital & Regional pre-acquisition.
In addition to this the joint ventures and associates paid £0.1 million (2024: £0.1 million) in audit fees.
| 2025 £m |
2024 £m |
|
|---|---|---|
| Insurance proceeds | – | 0.4 |
| Other income | – | 0.4 |
The prior year balance of £0.4 million relates to Covid-19 income disruption following agreement with the insurer.
There were no disposals of joint ventures in the year ended 31 March 2025
On 27 June 2023, the Group disposed its 50% share in the 'Napier' joint venture which owned Kittybrewster Retail Park in Aberdeen and Glendoe and Telford Retail Parks in Inverness.
Included in the carrying value on disposal were investment properties of £32.2 million, cash of £1.3 million and third party debt of £(12.0) million.
| £m | |
|---|---|
| Carrying value at 31 March 2023 | 23.6 |
| Movement in the period 31 March 2023 to 27 June 2023 | (0.3) |
| Carrying value at 27 June 2023 | 23.3 |
| Net cash proceeds | 21.0 |
| Loss on disposal of a joint venture | (2.3) |
The total cash consideration for the sale was £64.0 million which included £62.6 million (NewRiver share: £31.3 million) consideration for the value of the JV properties.
The total cash consideration was distributed as follows:
After the deduction of the above amounts and the settlement of various costs associated with the disposal, £18.0 million was received by NewRiver. Net proceeds of £21.0 million recognised by NewRiver include the £3.0 million repayment of the shareholder loan.

| 2025 £m |
2024 £m |
|
|---|---|---|
| Gross disposal proceeds | 3.8 | 6.8 |
| Carrying value | (3.9) | (10.2) |
| Cost of disposal | (0.8) | (0.4) |
| Loss on disposal of investment properties | (0.9) | (3.8) |
| 2025 £m |
2024 £m |
|
|---|---|---|
| Income from loans with joint ventures and associates | 0.2 | 0.2 |
| Income from treasury deposits | 5.1 | 5.2 |
| Finance income | 5.3 | 5.4 |
| Interest on borrowings | (14.1) | (12.7) |
| Finance cost on lease liabilities | (2.6) | (2.6) |
| Write off of unamortised debt costs | (0.9) | – |
| Finance costs | (17.6) | (15.3) |
| 2025 £m |
2024 £m |
|
|---|---|---|
| Deferred taxation charge | 3.0 | – |
| Profit before tax | 26.7 | 3.0 |
| Tax at the current rate of 25% (2024: 25%) | 6.7 | 0.8 |
| Revaluation of property | (0.5) | 3.5 |
| Movement in unrecognised deferred tax | (1.3) | 1.1 |
| Non-taxable profit due to REIT regime | (2.9) | (5.4) |
| Non-taxable income | 1.0 | – |
| Taxation charge | 3.0 | – |
The Group is a member of the REIT regime whereby profits from its UK property rental business are tax exempt. The REIT regime only applies to certain property-related profits and has several criteria which have to be met. The main criteria are:
The Group continues to meet these conditions, and management intends that the Group should continue as a REIT for the foreseeable future. The Group has not recognised a deferred tax liability or deferred tax asset. The deferred tax relates to the de-recognition of a deferred tax asset which was acquired during the year. As at 31 March 2025 the Group had unrecognised tax losses of £9.2 million (2024: £9.4 million). The losses have not been recognised as an asset due to uncertainty over the availability of taxable income to utilise the losses. The losses do not expire but are reliant on continuity of ownership and source of trade.

A reconciliation of the performance measures to the nearest IFRS measure is below:
| 2025 £m |
2024 £m |
|
|---|---|---|
| Profit for the year after taxation | 23.7 | 3.0 |
| Adjustments | ||
| Net valuation movement | (2.1) | 13.9 |
| Loss on disposal of investment properties | 0.9 | 3.8 |
| Loss on disposal of joint venture | – | 2.3 |
| Write off of unamortised debt costs | 0.9 | – |
| Deferred tax | 3.0 | – |
| Exceptional costs1 | 0.7 | – |
| Amortisation of intangibles2 | 0.3 | – |
| Costs to unlock3 | 1.1 | – |
| Group's share of joint ventures' and associates' adjustments | ||
| Revaluation of investment properties | 0.1 | – |
| Revaluation of derivatives | – | (0.1) |
| Profit on disposal of investment properties | (0.2) | – |
| EPRA earnings | 28.4 | 22.9 |
| Share-based payment charge | 1.5 | 1.5 |
| Forward looking element of IFRS 94 | 0.1 | – |
| Snozone depreciation and amortisation | 0.7 | – |
| Snozone lease liability interest | (0.2) | – |
| Underlying Funds From Operations (UFFO) | 30.5 | 24.4 |
Exceptional costs comprise expenses relating to the acquisition of Ellandi
Amortisation of intangibles relates to the amortisation of the intangible asset recognised on the acquisition of Ellandi
Costs to unlock comprise net costs in relation to unlocking expected net cost synergies following the acquisition of Capital & Regional e.g. redundancy and head office costs
Forward looking element of IFRS 9 relates to a provision against debtor balances in relation to invoices in advance for future rental income. These balances are not due in the current year and therefore no income has been recognised in relation to these debtors.
| 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|
| Number of shares | No. m | No. m |
| Weighted average number of ordinary shares for the purposes of Basic EPS, UFFO and EPRA |
311.4 | |
| 376.3 | ||
| Effect of dilutive potential ordinary shares: | ||
| Performance share plan | 1.5 | 1.6 |
| Deferred bonus shares | 0.8 | 0.9 |
| Weighted average number of ordinary shares for the purposes of Diluted EPS | 378.6 | 313.9 |
| 2025 | 2024 | |
| IFRS Basic EPS | 6.3 | 1.0 |
| IFRS Diluted EPS | 6.3 | 1.0 |
| EPRA EPS | 7.5 | 7.4 |
| UFFO EPS | 8.1 | 7.8 |
The below table reconciles the differences between the calculation of basic and EPRA NTA, a non-GAAP measure.
EPRA NTA per share and basic NTA per share:
| 2025 | 2024 | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| £m | Shares m |
Pence per share |
£m | Shares m |
Pence per share |
|
| Net assets | 490.1 | 475.5* | 103p | 361.1 | 310.4* | 116p |
| Employee awards | ||||||
| vested not yet exercised | – | 1.2 | – | 0.4 | ||
| Unexercised | ||||||
| employee awards | – | 2.2 | – | 2.5 | ||
| Diluted net assets | 490.1 | 478.9 | 102p | 361.1 | 313.3 | 115p |
| Group's share of associates | ||||||
| deferred tax liability | 0.9 | – | 0.8 | – | ||
| Goodwill | (3.6) | – | – | – | ||
| Intangible asset | (0.9) | – | – | – | ||
| Group's share of joint | ||||||
| venture / associates fair | ||||||
| value derivatives | – | – | (0.1) | – | ||
| EPRA Net Tangible Assets | 486.5 | 478.9 | 102p | 361.8 | 313.3 | 115p |
* See note 23

The dividends paid in the year are set out below:
| Pence per | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Payment date | PID | Non-PID | share | £m |
| Year to March 2024 | ||||
| Ordinary dividends | ||||
| 4 August 2023 | 3.2 | – | 3.2 | 9.8 |
| 16 January 2024 | 3.4 | – | 3.4 | 10.5 |
| 20.3 | ||||
| Year to March 2025 | ||||
| Ordinary dividends | ||||
| 16 August 2024 | 3.2 | – | 3.2 | 9.8 |
| 28 January 2025 | 3.0 | – | 3.0 | 14.2 |
| 24.0 |
The final dividend of 3.5 pence per share in respect of the year ended 31 March 2025, subject to shareholder approval at the 2025 AGM, will be paid on 8 August 2025 to shareholders on the register as at 20 June 2025. The dividend will be payable as a REIT Property Income Distribution (PID).
| 2025 £m |
2024 £m |
|
|---|---|---|
| Dividends paid | (24.0) | (20.3) |
| Scrip dividend | 1.8 | 1.6 |
| Movement in withholding tax | 0.4 | – |
| Dividends paid in the consolidated cash flow statement | (21.8) | (18.7) |
Profits distributed out of tax-exempt profits are PID dividends. PID dividends are paid after deduction of withholding tax (currently at 20%), which NewRiver pays directly to HMRC on behalf of the shareholder.
Any non-PID element of dividends will be treated in exactly the same way as dividends from other UK, non-REIT companies.
| 2025 £m |
2024 £m |
|
|---|---|---|
| Fair value brought forward | 533.8 | 551.5 |
| Acquisitions* | 344.7 | – |
| Capital expenditure | 9.7 | 5.3 |
| Lease incentives, letting and legal costs | 1.0 | 0.9 |
| Disposals | (3.9) | (10.2) |
| Net valuation movement | 2.2 | (13.7) |
| Fair value carried forward | 887.5 | 533.8 |
| Right of use asset (investment property) see note 22 | 51.5 | 74.9 |
| Fair value carried forward | 939.0 | 608.7 |
* Acquisitions of £344.7 million comprise six investment properties acquired through the Capital & Regional transaction, see note 17.
The Group's investment properties have been valued at fair value on 31 March 2025 by independent valuers, Colliers International Valuation UK LLP and Knight Frank LLP, on the basis of fair value in accordance with the Current Practice Statements contained in The Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors Valuation – Professional Standards, (the 'Red Book'). The valuations are performed by appropriately qualified valuers who have relevant and recent experience in the sector.
The Group is exposed to changes in the residual value of properties at the end of current lease agreements. The residual value risk born by the Group is mitigated by active management of its property portfolio with the objective of optimising tenant mix in order to:
The Group also grants lease incentives to encourage high quality tenants to remain in properties for longer lease terms. In the case of anchor tenants, this also attracts other tenants to the property thereby contributing to overall occupancy levels.
The fair value at 31 March represents the highest and best use.
The properties are categorised as Level 3 in the IFRS 13 fair value hierarchy. There were no transfers of property between Levels 1, 2 and 3. Level 1 inputs are quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that the entity can access at the measurement date. Level 2 inputs are inputs other than quoted prices included within Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly. Level 3 inputs are unobservable inputs for the asset or liability.

| Property ERV | Property rent | Property equivalent |
||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fair value £m |
Min £ per sq ft |
Max £ per sq ft |
Average £ per sq ft |
Min £ per sq ft |
Max £ per sq ft |
Average £ per sq ft |
yield Average % |
|
| Retail parks | 180.6 | 9.8 | 21.0 | 13.5 | 6.6 | 19.0 | 12.0 | 6.5 |
| Shopping Centres – Core |
652.0 | 4.3 | 32.3 | 14.5 | 1.9 | 32.4 | 10.9 | 8.8 |
| Shopping Centres – Regeneration |
24.7 | 5.1 | 10.4 | 10.0 | 2.9 | 5.1 | 3.1 | 11.5 |
| Shopping Centres – Work Out |
28.0 | 9.3 | 16.7 | 14.5 | 1.0 | 3.8 | 2.0 | 10.4 |
| High street and other | 2.2 | 3.9 | 5.6 | 5.0 | 1.4 | 6.2 | 3.6 | 11.4 |
| 887.5 |
| Property ERV | Property rent | Property equivalent |
||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fair value £m |
Min £ per sq ft |
Max £ per sq ft |
Average £ per sq ft |
Min £ per sq ft |
Max £ per sq ft |
Average £ per sq ft |
yield Average % |
|
| Retail parks | 132.8 | 10.6 | 14.2 | 11.8 | 8.3 | 14.7 | 10.8 | 7.0 |
| Shopping Centres – Core |
234.5 | 4.2 | 32.0 | 12.4 | 4.1 | 32.3 | 10.5 | 9.6 |
| Shopping Centres – Regeneration |
128.9 | 5.0 | 18.6 | 16.0 | 3.0 | 13.7 | 10.5 | 7.4 |
| Shopping Centres – Work Out |
34.4 | 5.9 | 17.5 | 6.3 | 1.3 | 3.3 | 1.5 | 12.0 |
| High street and other | 3.2 | 4.0 | 6.2 | 5.7 | 3.9 | 6.2 | 4.9 | 9.2 |
| 533.8 |
As set out within significant accounting estimates and judgements in note 2, the Group's property portfolio valuation is open to judgements and is inherently subjective by nature. As a result, the sensitivity analysis below illustrates the impact of changes in key unobservable inputs on the fair value of the Group's properties.
We consider +/-10% for ERV and +/-100bps for NEY to capture the uncertainty in these key valuation assumptions and deem it to be a reasonably possible scenario.
The investments are a portfolio of retail assets in the UK. The valuation was determined using an income capitalisation method, which involves applying a yield to rental income streams. Inputs include yield, current rent and ERV.
The inputs to the valuation include:
There were no changes to valuation techniques during the year. Valuation reports are based on both information provided by the Group, for example, current rents and lease terms which is derived from the Group's financial and property management systems and is subject to the Group's overall control environment, and assumptions applied by the valuers, e.g. ERVs and yields. These assumptions are based on market observation and the valuers' professional judgement, which includes a consideration of climate change and a range of other external factors.
| Impact on valuations of a 10% change in ERV |
Impact on valuations of 100 bps change in yield |
||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Asset Type | Retail asset valuation £m |
Increase 10% £m |
Decrease 10% £m |
Increase 1.0% £m |
Decrease 1.0% £m |
| Retail parks | 180.6 | 15.6 | (15.5) | (23.0) | 31.8 |
| Shopping Centres – Core | 652.0 | 59.6 | (56.7) | (75.9) | 97.8 |
| Shopping Centres – Regeneration | 24.7 | 1.6 | (1.6) | (0.7) | 0.9 |
| Shopping Centres – Work Out | 28.0 | 2.3 | (2.3) | (4.0) | 4.9 |
| High street and other | 2.2 | 0.4 | (0.4) | (0.2) | 0.3 |
| 887.5 | 79.5 | (76.5) | (103.8) | 135.7 |
| Impact on valuations of a 10% change in ERV |
Impact on valuations of 100 bps change in yield |
||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Asset Type | Retail asset valuation £m |
Increase 10% £m |
Decrease 10% £m |
Increase 1.0% £m |
Decrease 1.0% £m |
| Retail parks | 132.8 | 10.2 | (10.1) | (14.6) | 19.5 |
| Shopping Centres – Core | 234.5 | 17.7 | (16.2) | (20.7) | 26.2 |
| Shopping Centres – Regeneration | 128.9 | 12.6 | (12.3) | (15.9) | 21.0 |
| Shopping Centres – Work Out | 34.4 | 4.3 | (4.3) | (4.4) | 5.4 |
| High street and other | 3.2 | 0.5 | (0.5) | (0.4) | 0.5 |
| 533.8 | 45.3 | (43.4) | (56.0) | 72.6 |

| Net valuation movement in investment properties | 2025 £m |
2024 £m |
|---|---|---|
| Net valuation movement in investment properties | 2.2 | (13.7) |
| Net valuation movement in right of use asset | (0.1) | (0.2) |
| Net valuation movement in consolidated statement of comprehensive income | 2.1 | (13.9) |
Reconciliation to properties at valuation in the portfolio
| Note | 2025 £m |
2024 £m |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Investment property | 14 | 887.5 | 533.8 |
| Properties held in associates | 16 | 10.0 | 10.0 |
| Properties at valuation | 897.5 | 543.8 |
As at 31 March 2025 the Group has no joint ventures (31 March 2024: one joint venture).
| 2025 £m |
2024 £m |
|
|---|---|---|
| Opening balance | 0.1 | 23.8 |
| Disposals | – | (23.3) |
| Group's share of profit after taxation excluding valuation movement | – | 0.5 |
| Net valuation movement | – | – |
| Dividends | (0.1) | (0.9) |
| Investment in joint venture | – | 0.1 |
| Name | Country of incorporation | 2025 % Holding |
2024 % Holding |
|---|---|---|---|
| NewRiver Retail Investments LP (NRI LP) | Guernsey | – | 50 |
| NewRiver Retail (Napier) Limited (Napier) | UK | – | – |
The Group is the appointed asset manager on behalf of these joint ventures and receives asset management fees, development management fees and performance-related bonuses.
NewRiver Retail Investments LP has a 31 December year end and was wound up in the year ended 31 March 2025. The aggregate amounts recognised in the consolidated balance sheet and consolidated statement of comprehensive income at 31 March are as follows:
| 2025 | 2024 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Consolidated balance sheet | Total £m |
Group's share £m |
Total £m |
Group's share £m |
|
| Non-current assets | – | – | – | – | |
| Current assets | – | – | 0.3 | 0.1 | |
| Current liabilities | – | – | – | – | |
| Liabilities due in more than one year | – | – | – | – | |
| Net assets | – | – | 0.3 | 0.1 | |
| Loan to joint venture | – | – | – | – | |
| Net assets adjusted for loan to joint venture | – | – | 0.3 | 0.1 |
The table above provides summarised financial information for the joint ventures. The information disclosed reflects the amounts presented in the financial statements of the joint ventures. To arrive at the Group's share of these amounts under equity accounting, certain minor adjustments are required to be made.
The Group's share of contingent liabilities in the joint venture is £nil (31 March 2024: £nil).
| 2025 | 2024 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Consolidated statement of comprehensive income | Total £m |
Group's share £m |
Total £m |
Group's share £m |
|
| Revenue | – | – | 1.4 | 0.7 | |
| Property operating expenses | – | – | – | – | |
| Net property income | – | – | 1.4 | 0.7 | |
| Administration expenses | – | – | (0.1) | (0.1) | |
| Net finance costs | – | – | (0.1) | (0.1) | |
| Group's share of joint ventures' profit before valuation movements |
– | – | 1.2 | 0.5 | |
| Net valuation movement | – | – | – | – | |
| Profit on disposal of investment property | – | – | – | – | |
| Profit after taxation | – | – | 1.2 | 0.5 | |
| Add back net valuation movement | – | – | – | – | |
| Group's share of joint ventures' profit before valuation movements |
– | – | 1.2 | 0.5 |
| NewRiver REIT plc Annual Report and Accounts 2025 2025 |
Strategic Report | Governance Report | Financial Statements | ESG Data Sets & Appendix |
Glossary & Company Information |
187 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
The Group has one direct investment in an associate entity in which it has a 10% stake, Sealand S.à.r.l, which owns 100% of NewRiver Retail (Hamilton) Limited and NewRiver (Sprucefield) Limited at 31 March 2025.
| 2025 £m |
2024 £m |
||
|---|---|---|---|
| Opening balance | 5.6 | 5.5 | |
| Dividends | (0.4) | (0.2) | |
| Group's share of profit after taxation excluding valuation movement | 0.2 | 0.3 | |
| Net valuation movement | (0.1) | – | |
| Investment in associates | 5.3 | 5.6 | |
| Name | Country of incorporation | 2025 % Holding |
2024 % Holding |
| NewRiver Retail (Hamilton) Limited (Hamilton) | UK | 10 | 10 |
| NewRiver (Sprucefield) Limited (Sprucefield) | UK | 10 | 10 |
The Group is the appointed asset manager on behalf of Sealand S.à.r.l and receives asset management fees, development management fees and performance-related bonuses.
The aggregate amounts recognised in the consolidated balance sheet and consolidated statement of comprehensive income are as follows:
| 31 March 2025 | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Total £m |
Group's share £m |
Total £m |
Group's share £m |
| 100.3 | 10.0 | 100.0 | 10.0 |
| 8.7 | 0.8 | 6.6 | 0.7 |
| (39.2) | (3.9) | (36.1) | (3.6) |
| (47.4) | (4.7) | ||
| 2.4 | |||
| 3.2 | |||
| 21.6 | 5.3 | 23.1 | 5.6 |
| (48.2) 21.6 – |
(4.8) 2.1 3.2 |
31 March 2024 23.1 – |
The Group's share of contingent liabilities in the associates is £nil (31 March 2024: £nil).
| Consolidated statement of comprehensive income | 2025 Total £m |
2025 Group's share £m |
2024 Total £m |
2024 Group's share £m |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | 8.4 | 0.8 | 8.4 | 0.8 |
| Property operating expenses | (2.1) | (0.2) | (0.4) | – |
| Net property income | 6.3 | 0.6 | 8.0 | 0.8 |
| Administration expenses | (0.2) | – | (0.1) | – |
| Net finance costs | (5.1) | (0.5) | (4.9) | (0.5) |
| 1.0 | 0.1 | 3.0 | 0.3 | |
| Net valuation movement | (0.5) | (0.1) | (0.4) | – |
| Profit on disposal of investment property | 2.0 | 0.2 | – | – |
| Taxation | (1.4) | (0.1) | (0.4) | – |
| Profit after taxation | 1.1 | 0.1 | 2.2 | 0.3 |
| Add back net valuation movement | 0.5 | 0.1 | 0.4 | – |
| Group's share of associates' profit before | ||||
| valuation movements | 1.6 | 0.2 | 2.6 | 0.3 |
On 10 December 2024 the Company acquired 100% of the share capital of Capital & Regional plc and subsidiaries for total consideration of £150.9 million. The value of net assets acquired was £164.6 million. The acquisition has been accounted for as an asset acquisition and the difference between the consideration paid and the net assets acquired, representing a price discount of £13.7 million, has reduced the cost of investment property acquired.
| £m | |
|---|---|
| Cash | 73.3 |
| Shares | 77.6 |
| Total consideration | 150.9 |
| £m | |
|---|---|
| Transaction costs | 8.5 |
| Total consideration including transaction costs | 159.4 |
| £m | |
|---|---|
| Investment property | 344.7 |
| Cash and cash equivalents | 25.8 |
| Bank loans | (199.0) |
| Other net assets and liabilities | (12.1) |
| Total net assets | 159.4 |
On 3 July 2024 the Company acquired 100% of the share capital of Ellandi Management Limited (Ellandi) and subsidiaries, an asset and development management business focused on UK retail and regeneration.
As a result of the acquisition, the Group is expected to grow its third party asset management, capital partnership and regeneration business.
The Group also expects to reduce costs through combining the operations of the Group and Ellandi.
The Goodwill of £3.6 million arising from the acquisition consists largely of synergies from integrating the Ellandi asset management platform with the existing NewRiver asset management platform to enhance the knowledge base, data analytical capacity and third party support networks through the combined platform. An intangible asset of £1.2 million in respect of customer relationships was recognised on acquisition. Intangible assets arising on business combinations are initially recognised at fair value. Goodwill is not amortised but is tested at least annually for impairment. Intangible assets arising on business combinations are amortised on a straight line basis to the income statement over their expected useful lives, management consider this to be a three year period. In the year ended 31 March 2025 the Group recognised an amortisation charge to intangible assets of £0.3 million (2024: £nil).
The following table summarises the consideration paid, and the fair value of the assets acquired, and liabilities assumed at acquisition date.
| £m | |
|---|---|
| Cash and cash equivalents | 1.1 |
| Current assets | 2.0 |
| Current liabilities | (0.9) |
| Intangible asset | 1.2 |
| Fair value of acquired interest in net assets in subsidiaries | 3.4 |
| Total consideration | 7.0 |
| Goodwill | 3.6 |
| £m | |
| Intangible asset on acquisition | 1.2 |
| Less: amortisation | (0.3) |
| Intangible asset as at 31 March 2025 | 0.9 |
| 2025 £m |
2024 £m |
|
|---|---|---|
| Trade receivables | 5.0 | 1.4 |
| Restricted monetary assets | 5.0 | 4.6 |
| Service charge receivables* | 2.6 | 0.7 |
| Other receivables | 0.8 | 1.0 |
| Prepayments | 5.1 | 1.2 |
| Accrued income | 3.6 | 2.5 |
| 22.1 | 11.4 |
* Included in service charge receivables is £3.2 million of service charge debtors (2024: £1.5 million) and £0.6 million of bad debt provision (2024: £0.8 million).
Trade receivables are shown net of a loss allowance of £2.4 million (2024: £1.9 million). Other receivables are shown net of a loss allowance of £nil (2024: £0.1 million). The provision for doubtful debts is calculated as an expected credit loss on trade receivables in accordance with IFRS 9. The release to the consolidated statement of comprehensive income in relation to doubtful debts made against tenant debtors was £0.2 million (2024: £0.1 million charge). The Group has calculated the expected credit loss by applying a forward-looking outlook to historical default rates.
The Group monitors rent collection and the ability of tenants to pay rent receivables in order to anticipate synergies from integrating the Ellandi asset management platform with the existing NRR asset management platform to enhance the knowledge base, data analytical capacity and third party support networks through the combined platforms minimise the impact of default by tenants. All outstanding rent receivables are regularly monitored. In order to measure the expected credit losses, trade receivables from tenants have been grouped on a basis of shared credit risk characteristics and an assumption around the tenants' ability to pay their receivable, based on conversations held and our knowledge of their credit history. The expected credit loss rates are based on historical payment profiles of tenant debtors and corresponding historical credit losses.
| NewRiver REIT plc Annual Report and Accounts 2025 2025 |
Strategic Report | Governance Report | Financial Statements | ESG Data Sets & Appendix |
Glossary & Company Information |
189 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|
| £m | £m | |
| Opening loss allowance at 1 April | 1.9 | 3.0 |
| (Decrease) / increase in loss allowance recognised in the consolidated statement | ||
| of comprehensive income during the year in relation to tenant debtors | (0.2) | 0.1 |
| Loss allowance utilisation | 0.7 | (1.2) |
| Closing loss allowance at 31 March | 2.4 | 1.9 |
The restricted monetary assets relates to cash balances which the Group cannot readily access. They do not meet the definition of cash and cash equivalents and consequently are presented separately from cash in the consolidated balance sheet.
As at 31 March 2025 and 31 March 2024 cash and cash equivalents comprised of cash held in bank accounts and treasury deposits. There were no restrictions on cash in either the current or prior year.
| 2025 £m |
2024 £m |
|
|---|---|---|
| Trade payables | 1.6 | 1.3 |
| Service charge liabilities* | 15.8 | 7.2 |
| Other payables | 7.9 | 3.1 |
| Accruals | 18.1 | 9.5 |
| Value Added Taxation | 1.8 | 0.3 |
| Rent received in advance | 8.2 | 4.9 |
| 53.4 | 26.3 |
* Service charge liabilities include accruals of £1.1 million (2024: £0.6 million), service charge creditors and other creditors of £12.2 million (2024 £3.8 million), Value added taxation of £0.3 million (2024: £0.9 million) and deferred income of £2.2 million (2024: £1.9 million).
| Maturity of drawn borrowings: | 2025 £m |
2024 £m |
|---|---|---|
| Between one and two years | 140.0 | – |
| Between two and three years | 300.0 | – |
| Between three and four years | – | 300.0 |
| Between four and five years | – | – |
| Less unamortised fees / discount | (3.0) | (3.4) |
| 437.0 | 296.6 |
The fair value of the Group's corporate bond has been estimated on the basis of quoted market prices, representing Level 1 fair value measurement as defined by IFRS 13 Fair Value Measurement. At 31 March 2025 the fair value was £283.2 million (31 March 2024: £275.5 million).
As at 31 March 2025, the fair value of The Mall facility was £133.2 million.
| Secured borrowings: | Maturity date | Facility £m |
Facility drawn £m |
Unamortised facility fees / discount £m |
£m |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Mall | January 2027 | 140.0 | 140.0 | (0.6) | 139.4 |
| 140.0 | 140.0 | (0.6) | 139.4 | ||
| Unsecured borrowings: | Maturity date | Facility £m |
Facility drawn £m |
Unamortised facility fees / discount £m |
£m |
| Revolving credit facility | November 2026 | 100.0 | – | (0.8) | (0.8) |
| Corporate bond | March 2028 | 300.0 | 300.0 | (1.6) | 298.4 |
| 400.0 | 300.0 | (2.4) | 297.6 | ||
| Total borrowings | 540.0 | 440.0 | (3.0) | 437.0 |
The Group earns rental income by leasing its investment properties to tenants under noncancellable lease commitments.
The Group holds three types of leases.
The lease liability and associated ROU asset recognised in the consolidated balance sheet are set out below.
| 2025 £m |
2024 £m |
|
|---|---|---|
| Right of use asset (Investment property) | 51.5 | 74.9 |
| Right of use asset (Property, plant and equipment) | 18.1 | 0.7 |
| Current lease liability | 1.8 | 0.4 |
| Non-current lease liability | 71.8 | 75.2 |
| NewRiver REIT plc Annual Report and Accounts 2025 2025 |
Strategic Report | Governance Report | Financial Statements | ESG Data Sets & Appendix |
Glossary & Company Information |
190 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Right of use assets (Property, plant and equipment) | 2025 £m |
2024 £m |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | ||
| Brought forward | 1.1 | 1.1 |
| Additions | 18.2 | – |
| Carried forward | 19.3 | 1.1 |
| Accumulated depreciation | ||
| Brought forward | (0.4) | (0.2) |
| Charge for the year | (0.8) | (0.2) |
| At 31 March 2025/2024 | (1.2) | (0.4) |
| Carrying value | ||
| Carried forward | 18.1 | 0.7 |
| Right of use asset (Investment property) | 2025 £m |
2024 £m |
| Fair value brought forward | 74.9 | 75.8 |
| Acquisitions | 5.3 | – |
| Disposals | (3.7) | – |
| Revaluation | (0.1) | (0.9) |
| Lease modification | (24.9) | – |
| Fair value carried forward | 51.5 | 74.9 |
The expense relating to low value assets which have not been recognised under IFRS 16 was £nil (March 2024: £nil) and the expense relating to variable lease payments not included in the measurement of lease liabilities was £nil (March 2024: £nil). The total cash outflow in relation to lease commitments for the year was £3.6 million (March 2024: £2.4 million), £1.0 million (2024: £0.4 million) relates to the repayment of principle lease liabilities and £2.6 million (2024: £2.0 million) relates to the repayment of interest on lease liabilities. Depreciation recognised on ROU assets during the year was £0.8 million (2024: £0.2 million)
| 2025 £m |
2024 £m |
|
|---|---|---|
| Within one year | 1.8 | 0.4 |
| Between one and two years | 2.0 | 0.8 |
| In the second to fifth year inclusive | 1.8 | 0.6 |
| After five years | 68.0 | 73.8 |
| 73.6 | 75.6 |
Lease commitments payable by the Group are as follows:
| 2025 £m |
2024 £m |
|
|---|---|---|
| Within one year | 5.3 | 2.9 |
| One to two years | 4.6 | 2.9 |
| Two to five years | 13.3 | 8.8 |
| After five years | 1,285.6 | 247.8 |
| 1,308.8 | 262.4 | |
| Effect of discounting | (1,235.2) | (186.8) |
| Lease liability | 73.6 | 75.6 |
At the balance sheet date the Group had contracted with tenants for the following future minimum lease payments on its investment properties:
| 2025 £m |
2024 £m |
|
|---|---|---|
| Within one year | 65.3 | 47.3 |
| Between one and two years | 54.8 | 41.2 |
| In the second to fifth year inclusive | 100.4 | 88.3 |
| After five years | 214.5 | 147.3 |
| 435.0 | 324.1 |
The Group's weighted average lease length of lease commitments at 31 March 2025 was 5.8 years (March 2024: 5.2 years).
Operating lease obligations exist over the Group's offices, head leases on the Group's retail portfolio and ground rent leases. Investment properties are leased to tenants under operating leases with rentals payable monthly and quarterly. Where considered necessary to reduce credit risk, the Group may obtain bank guarantees for the term of the lease.
| Ordinary shares | Number of shares issued m's |
Price per share pence |
Total No of shares (m) |
Held by EBT No of shares (m) |
Shares in issue No of shares (m) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 April 2023 | 311.9 | 1.4 | 310.5 | ||
| Scrip dividends issued | 1.0 | 0.89 | 312.9 | 1.4 | 311.5 |
| Shares issued under employee share | |||||
| schemes | 1.2 | – | 312.9 | 0.2 | 312.7 |
| Purchase of own shares | (3.4) | – | 312.9 | 3.6 | 309.3 |
| Shares issued under employee share | |||||
| schemes | 0.3 | – | 312.9 | 3.3 | 309.6 |
| Scrip dividends issued | 0.8 | 0.82 | 313.7 | 3.3 | 310.4 |
| 31 March 2024 | 313.7 | 3.3 | 310.4 | ||
| Scrip dividends issued | 1.8 | 0.77 | 315.5 | 3.3 | 312.2 |
| Shares issued under employee share | |||||
| schemes | 0.2 | – | 315.5 | 3.1 | 312.4 |
| Equity placing and retail offer* | 62.7 | 0.80 | 378.2 | 3.1 | 375.1 |
| Shares issued under employee share | |||||
| schemes | 0.7 | – | 378.2 | 2.4 | 375.8 |
| Allotment of consideration shares** | 98.3 | 0.79 | 476.5 | 2.4 | 474.1 |
| Shares issued under employee share | |||||
| schemes | 0.8 | – | 476.5 | 1.6 | 474.9 |
| Scrip dividends issued | 0.6 | 0.73 | 477.1 | 1.6 | 475.5 |
| 31 March 2025 | 477.1 | 1.6 | 475.5 |
* In September 2024, the Group raised £48.9 million of net proceeds for the issue of 62.7 million shares. The share premium, representing the amount received over the nominal value of shares, was £48.1 million. These newly issued shares carry the same rights as the existing share capital.
** The Company issued 98.3 million ordinary shares as consideration for the acquisition of Capital & Regional on 10 December 2024. The share premium, representing the amount received over the nominal value of shares, was £76.6 million. These newly issued shares carry the same rights as the existing share capital.
All shares issued and authorised are fully paid up.
The merger reserve arose as a result of a group reorganisation in 2016 and represents the nominal amount of share capital that was issued to shareholders of NewRiver Retail Limited.
In December 2024 the Company acquired Capital & Regional. Some of the consideration was paid in equity shares of the Company. The difference between the nominal value of the shares issued and the cost of the net asset acquired was recorded in the merger reserve.
Share premium represents amounts subscribed for a share in excess of nominal value less directly attributable issue costs.
Retained earnings consist of the accumulated net comprehensive profit of the Group, less dividends paid from distributable reserves, and transfers from equity issues where those equity issues generated distributable reserves.
Shares issued in respect of elections to participate in the Scrip Dividend scheme in respect of dividends declared in the year, the value of these was £1.8 million (2024: £1.6 million). The Scrip Dividend Scheme was re-approved on 26 July 2023. The scheme provides shareholders of NewRiver Ordinary shares with the opportunity, at the shareholders election and where offered by the Company, to elect to receive dividends as New Ordinary shares in the Company instead of their cash dividend, with no dealing charges or stamp duty incurred.
As part of the group reorganisation in 2016, the Company established an EBT which is registered in Jersey. The EBT, at its discretion, may transfer shares held by it to directors and employees of the Company and its subsidiaries. The maximum number of ordinary shares that may be held by the EBT may not exceed 5% of the Company's issued share capital. It is intended that the EBT will not hold more ordinary shares than are required in order to satisfy share options granted under employee share incentive plans.
As at 31 March 2025 there are 1,624,929 ordinary shares held by EBT (2024: 3,317,218).

The Group has two share schemes for employees:
Zero priced share options have been issued to senior management and executive directors under the Performance Share Scheme since 2013. The options vest to the extent that performance conditions are met over a three or five-year period. At the end of the period there may be a further vesting condition that the employee or director remains an employee of the Group. Further details on the scheme and the performance conditions are provided in the Remuneration Report. The charge for the year recognised in the consolidated statement of comprehensive income was £0.8 million (March 2024: £0.7 million). The average share price on the date the awards were exercised in the year was 80.3 pence per share.
| Financial year issued |
Fair value at date of grant |
Outstanding at start of year millions |
Granted millions |
Number Exercised millions |
Lapsed/ Cancelled millions |
Outstanding at end of year millions |
Number exercisable millions |
Average remaining life (years) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 0.37 | 0.4 | – | (0.1) | – | 0.3 | – | – |
| 2022 | 0.19 | 3.2 | 0.2 | (1.0) | (1.6) | 0.8 | – | – |
| 2023 | 0.64 | 2.9 | 0.3 | – | – | 3.2 | – | 0.4 |
| 2024 | 0.66 | 2.8 | 0.2 | – | – | 3.0 | – | 1.3 |
| 2025 | 0.40 | – | 3.2 | – | – | 3.2 | – | 2.2 |
| 9.3 | 3.9 | (1.1) | (1.6) | 10.5 | – | – |
Zero priced share options have been issued to senior management and executive directors under the Deferred Bonus Scheme since 2016. The options vest based on the employee or director remaining in the employment of the Group for a defined period (usually two years). The charge for the year recognised in the consolidated statement of comprehensive income for this scheme was £0.7 million (March 2024: £0.5 million).
| Financial year issued |
Share price at date of grant |
Outstanding at start of year millions |
Granted millions |
Number Exercised millions |
Lapsed/ Cancelled millions |
Outstanding at end of year millions |
Number exercisable millions |
Average remaining life (years) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2018 | 1.77 | 0.1 | – | – | – | 0.1 | – | – |
| 2019 | 1.78 | 0.1 | – | – | – | 0.1 | – | – |
| 2020 | 0.63 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – |
| 2021 | 0.78 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – |
| 2022 | 0.73 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – |
| 2023 | 0.85 | 0.7 | – | – | – | 0.7 | – | – |
| 2024 | 0.89 | 0.7 | 0.1 | – | – | 0.8 | – | 0.3 |
| 2025 | 0.89 | – | 0.6 | – | – | 0.6 | – | 1.2 |
| 1.6 | 0.7 | – | – | 2.3 | – | – |
The fair value of the share options has been calculated based on a Monte Carlo Pricing Model which simulates the below market related conditions and compares them against those of the Comparator Group:
| 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|
| Share price | 0.82 | 0.89 |
| Exercise price | Nil | Nil |
| Expected volatility | 26.4% | 34% |
| Risk free rate | 4.900% | 4.980% |
| Expected dividends* | 0% | 0% |
* based on quoted property sector average.
Expected volatility is determined by calculating the two year volatility of the Group and the Total Shareholder Return Comparator Group. The risk free interest rate is the implied yield on zero coupon government bonds with a remaining term equal to the expected term of the Awards from the Grant Date.

The Group's activities expose it to a variety of financial risks in relation to the financial instruments it uses: market risk including cash flow interest rate risk, credit risk and liquidity risk. The financial risks relate to the following financial instruments: trade receivables, cash and cash equivalents, trade and other payables, borrowings and derivative financial instruments.
Risk management parameters are established by the Board on a project-by-project basis. Reports are provided to the Board quarterly and also when authorised changes are required.
| 2025 £m |
2024 £m |
|
|---|---|---|
| Financial assets | ||
| Financial assets at amortised cost | ||
| Trade and other receivables | 14.1 | 7.7 |
| Cash and cash equivalents | 61.3 | 132.8 |
| Total financial assets and maximum exposure to credit risk | 75.4 | 140.5 |
| Financial liabilities | ||
| At amortised cost | ||
| Borrowings | (437.0) | (296.6) |
| Lease liabilities | (73.6) | (75.6) |
| Payables and accruals | (40.9) | (18.1) |
| (551.5) | (390.3) | |
| (476.1) | (249.8) |
The fair value of the financial assets and liabilities at amortised cost are considered to be the same as their carrying value, with the exception of certain fixed rate borrowings, see note 21 for further details. None of the financial instruments above are held at fair value
The Group is not subject to material foreign currency risk as nearly all transactions are in Pounds Sterling, other than a small operation in Spain which operates in Euros.
At 31 March 2025 the Group has no interest rate risk as it has no drawn debt that is subject to variable interest rates and no open derivatives in controlled entities.
There would be no impact on finance costs to the Group, in the year or in the prior year, if interest rates increase or decrease as the Group has no drawn variable rate debt.
Strategic Report
The Group's principal financial assets are cash, trade receivables and other receivables.
Credit risk, being the risk that a counterparty will default on its contractual obligations resulting in financial loss to the Group, is primarily attributable to loans and trade and other receivables, which are principally amounts due from tenants. The Group manages its credit risk through policies to ensure that rental contracts are made with tenants meeting appropriate balance sheet covenants, supplemented by rental deposits or bank guarantees from international banks. The Group may suffer a void period where no rents are received. The quality of the tenant is assessed based on an extensive tenant covenant review scorecard prior to acquisition of the property. The assessment of the tenant credit worthiness is also monitored on an ongoing basis. Credit risk is assisted by the vast majority of occupational leases requiring that tenants pay rentals in advance. The Group monitors rent collection in order to anticipate and minimise the impact of default by tenants. All outstanding rent receivables are regularly monitored. In order to measure the expected credit losses, trade receivables from tenants have been grouped by shared credit risk characteristics and an assumption around the tenants' ability to pay their receivable, based on conversations held and our knowledge of their credit history. The expected loss rates are based on historical payment profiles of tenant debtors and corresponding historical credit losses. These historical loss rates are then adjusted to reflect the likelihood that tenants will pay. The Group's policy is to write off tenant debtors when the tenant is in administration or has vacated the unit.
& Appendix
Ageing of past due gross trade receivables and the carrying amount net of loss allowances is set out below:
| 2025 Gross amount £m |
2025 Loss allowance £m |
2025 % applied |
2025 Carrying amount £m |
2024 Gross amount £m |
2024 Loss allowance £m |
2024 % applied |
2024 Carrying amount £m |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0-30 days | 1.4 | 0.5 | 36% | 0.9 | 1.2 | 0.4 | 36% | 0.8 |
| 30-60 days | 0.2 | 0.1 | 50% | 0.1 | 0.3 | 0.1 | 33% | 0.2 |
| 60-90 days | 0.2 | 0.1 | 50% | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 100% | – |
| 90-120 days | 0.1 | 0.1 | 100% | – | 0.3 | 0.1 | 33% | 0.2 |
| Over 120 days | 0.8 | 0.7 | 88% | 0.1 | 1.4 | 1.2 | 86% | 0.2 |
| 2.7 | 1.5 | 1.2 | 3.3 | 1.9 | 1.4 |
The Group's total expected credit loss in relation to trade receivables, other receivables and accrued income is £2.4 million (2024: £2.3 million). The Group recognises an expected credit loss allowance on trade receivables of £1.5 million (2024: £1.9 million) as noted in the above table.
| NewRiver REIT plc Annual Report and Accounts 2025 2025 |
Strategic Report | Governance Report | Financial Statements | ESG Data Sets & Appendix |
Glossary & Company Information |
194 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 £m |
2024 £m |
|
|---|---|---|
| Risk level | ||
| Very high | 0.8 | 1.4 |
| High | 0.1 | 0.3 |
| Medium | 0.4 | 0.4 |
| Low | 1.4 | 1.2 |
| Gross carrying amount before loss allowance | 2.7 | 3.3 |
| Loss allowance | (1.5) | (1.9) |
| Carrying amount | 1.2 | 1.4 |
The Group monitors its counterparty exposures on cash and short-term deposits weekly. The Group monitors the counterparty credit rating of the institutions that hold its cash and deposits and spread the exposure across several banks.
The Group manages its liquidity risk by maintaining sufficient cash balances and committed credit facilities. The Board reviews the credit facilities in place on a regular basis. Cash flow reports are issued weekly to management and are reviewed quarterly by the Board. A summary table with maturity of financial liabilities is presented below:
| 2025 £m | Less than one year |
One to two years |
Two to five years |
More than five years |
Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Borrowings | – | (140.0) | (300.0) | – | (440.0) |
| Interest on borrowings | (15.4) | (14.2) | (9.7) | – | (39.3) |
| Lease liabilities | (5.3) | (4.6) | (13.3) | (1,285.6) | (1,308.8) |
| Payables and accruals | (40.9) | – | – | – | (40.9) |
| (61.6) | (158.8) | (323.0) | (1,285.6) | (1,829.0) | |
| 2024 £m | |||||
| Borrowings | – | – | (300.0) | – | (300.0) |
| Interest on borrowings | (10.5) | (10.5) | (20.2) | – | (41.2) |
| Lease liabilities | (2.9) | (2.9) | (8.8) | (247.8) | (262.4) |
| Payables and accruals | (18.1) | – | – | – | (18.1) |
| (31.5) | (13.4) | (329.0) | (247.8) | (621.7) |
| Reconciliation of movement in the Group's share of net debt in the year | 2025 £m |
2024 £m |
|---|---|---|
| Group's share of net debt at the beginning of year | 167.3 | 201.3 |
| Cash flow Net decrease / (increase) in cash and cash equivalents |
71.5 | (24.2) |
| New bank loans acquired (non-cash movement) | 199.0 | – |
| Bank loans repaid – principal | (59.0) | – |
| Bank loans repaid – settlement of associated derivatives | 1.0 | – |
| Bank loans repaid – write off of unamortised fees (non cash movement) | (0.9) | – |
| Change in bank loan fees to be amortised (non-cash movement) | 0.4 | (0.1) |
| Group's share of joint ventures' and associates' cash flow | ||
| Net (increase) / decrease in cash and cash equivalents | (0.4) | 2.2 |
| Bank loans repaid | – | (11.9) |
| New bank loans | 0.3 | – |
| Group's share of net debt | 379.2 | 167.3 |
| Being: | ||
| Group borrowings | 437.0 | 296.6 |
| Group's share of joint ventures' and associates' borrowings | 3.9 | |
| 4.3 | ||
| Group cash Group's share of joint venture and associate cash |
(61.3) (0.8) |
(132.8) (0.4) |
| Group's share of net debt | 379.2 | 167.3 |
| Changes in liabilities arising from financing activities | 2025 £m |
2024 £m |
| Liabilities arising from financing activities at the beginning of the year | 239.4 | 264.8 |
| Cash flow | ||
| Net decrease / (increase) in cash and cash equivalents | 71.5 | (24.2) |
| New bank loans acquired (non-cash movement) | 199.0 | – |
| Bank loans repaid | (59.0) | – |
| Bank loans repaid – settlement of associated derivatives | 1.0 | – |
| Bank loans repaid – write off of unamortised fees (non cash movement) | (0.9) | – |
| Repayment of principal portion of lease liability | (1.0) | (0.4) |
| Disposal (non-cash movement) | (3.7) | (0.7) |
| Lease modifications (non-cash movement) | (24.9) | – |
| Leases acquired on acquisition of Capital & Regional (non-cash movement) | 27.5 | – |
| Change in bank loan fees to be amortised (non-cash movement) | 0.4 | (0.1) |
| Liabilitites arising from financing activities | 449.3 | 239.4 |
| Being: | ||
| Borrowings | 437.0 | 296.6 |
| Cash | (61.3) | (132.8) |
| Lease liabilities | 73.6 | 75.6 |
| Liabilities arising from financing activities | 449.3 | 239.4 |

The Group's objectives when managing capital are to safeguard the Group's ability to continue as a going concern, to provide returns to shareholders and to maintain an optimal capital structure to reduce the cost of capital. The Group is not subject to any external capital requirements. As detailed in note 11, the Group is a REIT and to qualify as a REIT the Group must distribute 90% of its taxable income from its property business.
To maintain or adjust the capital structure, the Group may adjust the amount of dividends paid to shareholders, return capital to shareholders, issue new shares or sell assets. Consistent with others in the industry, the Group monitors capital on the basis of its gearing ratio. This ratio is calculated as net debt divided by equity. Net debt is calculated as total borrowings, less cash and cash equivalents on a proportionately consolidated basis.
Between 31 March 2024 and 31 March 2025, the Group's proportionally consolidated LTV increased from 30.8% to 42.3% and the gearing ratio from 45.4% to 76.7% mainly as a result of the Capital & Regional acquisition. The Group continually monitors LTV and will continue to monitor LTV closely, factoring in disposal activity and possible further valuation declines as disclosed in Note 1. The Group has remained compliant with all of its banking covenants during the year as discussed in Note 1.
| Net debt to equity ratio | 2025 £m |
2024 £m |
|---|---|---|
| Borrowings | 437.0 | 296.6 |
| Cash and cash equivalents | (61.3) | (132.8) |
| Net debt | 375.7 | 163.8 |
| Equity attributable to equity holders of the parent | 490.1 | 361.1 |
| Net debt to equity ratio ('Balance sheet gearing') | 76.7% | 45.4% |
| Share of joint ventures' and associates' borrowings | 4.3 | 3.9 |
| Share of joint ventures' and associates' cash and cash equivalents | (0.8) | (0.4) |
| Group's share of net debt | 379.2 | 167.3 |
| Carrying value of investment property | 887.5 | 533.8 |
| Share of joint ventures' and associates carrying value of investment properties | 10.0 | 10.0 |
| Group's share of carrying value of investment properties | 897.5 | 543.8 |
| Net debt to property value ratio ('Loan to value') | 42.3% | 30.8% |
| Reconciliation of financial liabilities | Lease liabilities £m |
Borrowings £m |
Total £m |
|---|---|---|---|
| As at 1 April 2024 | 75.6 | 296.6 | 372.2 |
| Decrease through financing cash flows | |||
| New borrowings | – | 140.0 | 140.0 |
| Repayment of principal portion of lease liability | (1.0) | – | (1.0) |
| Lease modifications | (24.9) | – | (24.9) |
| Leases acquired on acquisition of Capital & Regional | 27.6 | – | 27.6 |
| Disposal | (3.7) | – | (3.7) |
| Loan amortisation | – | 0.4 | 0.4 |
| As at 31 March 2025 | 73.6 | 437.0 | 510.6 |
| Lease liabilities |
Borrowings | Total | |
| Reconciliation of financial liabilities | £m | £m | £m |
| As at 1 April 2023 | 76.7 | 296.7 | 373.4 |
| Decrease through financing cash flows | |||
| Repayment of principal portion of lease liability | (0.4) | – | (0.4) |
| Disposal | (0.7) | – | (0.7) |
| Loan amortisation | – | (0.1) | (0.1) |
| As at 31 March 2024 | 75.6 | 296.6 | 372.2 |
The Group has no material contingent liabilities (31 March 2024: None). The Group was contractually committed to £2.8 million of capital expenditure to construct or develop investment property as at 31 March 2025 (2024: £0.7 million).

Transactions between the Company and its subsidiaries have been eliminated on consolidation and are not disclosed in this note.
During the year the Company paid £1.5 million (2024: £0.8 million) in professional legal fees to CMS Cameron McKenna Nabarro Olswang LLP for property services at commercial market rates. Allan Lockhart, CEO of NewRiver, has a personal relationship with one of the Partners at CMS who along with other Partners provides these legal services. There was £0.2 million outstanding at 31 March 2025 (2024: £nil).
The Group has loans with associates of £3.2 million (31 March 2024: £3.2 million).
Management fees are charged to joint ventures and associates for asset management, investment advisory, project management and accounting services.
Total fees charged were:
| 2025 £m |
2024 £m |
|
|---|---|---|
| NewRiver Retail (Hamilton) Limited | 0.2 | 0.2 |
| NewRiver (Sprucefield) Limited | 0.2 | 0.2 |
As at 31 March 2025, an amount of £0.6 million (2024: £0.3 million) was due to the Group relating to management fees.
During the year, the Group recognised £0.2 million of interest from joint ventures and associates (2024: £0.2 million) and as at 31 March 2025 the amount owing to the Group was £nil (2024: £0.2 million).
The remuneration of key management personnel (comprising of the Executive Directors, Non-Executive Directors and Executive Committee) of the Group is set out below in aggregate for each of the categories specified in IAS 24 'Related Party Disclosures.'
| 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|
| £m | £m | |
| Short-term employee benefits | 3.7 | 2.9 |
| Share-based payments | 0.9 | 0.9 |
| Other – including post-employment benefits | 0.1 | 0.1 |
| 4.7 | 3.9 |
All transfer of resources, services or obligations between the Company and these parties have been disclosed, regardless of whether a price is charged. We are unaware of any other related party transactions between related parties.
Related party relationships and transactions have been accounted for and disclosed in accordance with the requirements of IFRSs or other requirements, for example, the Companies Act 2006.
On May 22 2025, the Group completed the disposal of Jersey Property Unit Trust, New River Retail Property Unit Trust No. 6, which owns the Abbey Centre, Newtownabbey. The gross proceeds of £58.8 million were in line with the net book value of the property.
There were no other significant events occurring after the reporting period, but before the financial statements were authorised for issue.
| 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|
| Notes | £m | £m (restated) |
| Non-current assets | ||
| Investment in subsidiaries B |
487.1 | 311.2 |
| Amounts owed from subsidiary undertakings D |
219.4 | 211.9 |
| Total non-current assets | 706.5 | 523.1 |
| Current assets | ||
| Amounts owed from subsidiary undertakings D |
195.9 | 171.0 |
| Other receivables | 1.6 | 1.4 |
| Cash and cash equivalents | 32.8 | 115.9 |
| Total current assets | 230.3 | 288.3 |
| Total assets | 936.8 | 811.4 |
| Equity and liabilities | ||
| Current liabilities | ||
| Trade creditors | – | 0.1 |
| Accruals | 2.7 | 2.1 |
| Amounts owed to subsidiary undertakings | 165.5 | 159.1 |
| Total current liabilities E |
168.2 | 161.3 |
| Non-current liabilities | ||
| Borrowings F |
297.2 | 296.6 |
| Total non-current liabilities | 297.2 | 296.6 |
| Net assets | 471.4 | 353.5 |
| Equity | ||
| Share capital | 4.7 | 3.1 |
| Share premium | 53.9 | 4.0 |
| Merger reserve | 112.2 | 35.6 |
| Investment in own shares | (1.4) | (3.0) |
| Retained earnings | 302.0 | 313.8 |
| Total equity | 471.4 | 353.5 |
The notes on pages 199 to 203 form an integral part of the Company financial statements. The Company has applied the exemption in s408 of the Companies Act for omitting the income statement of the parent company. The profit for the year after taxation was £13.8 million (31 March 2024: £20.3 million).
The financial statements were approved by the Board of Directors on 16 June 2025 and were signed on its behalf by:
Allan Lockhart Chief Executive Officer Will Hobman Chief Financial Officer
Registered number: 10221027
| Notes | Share capital £m |
Share premium £m |
Merger reserve £m |
Purchase of own shares £m |
Retained earnings £m |
Total £m |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| As at 1 April 2023 (as previously stated) | 3.1 | 2.4 | 27.6 | – | 332.5 | 365.6 |
| Restated | – | – | – | – | (10.7) | (10.7) |
| As at 1 April 2023 (restated) | 3.1 | 2.4 | 27.6 | – | 321.8 | 354.9 |
| Profit after taxation | – | – | – | – | 20.3 | 20.3 |
| Transfer to merger reserve | – | – | 8.0 | – | (8.0) | – |
| Equity issue | – | 1.6 | – | – | – | 1.6 |
| Purchase of own shares | – | – | – | (3.0) | – | (3.0) |
| Dividends paid | – | – | – | – | (20.3) | (20.3) |
| As at 31 March 2024 (restated) | 3.1 | 4.0 | 35.6 | (3.0) | 313.8 | 353.5 |
| Profit after taxation | – | – | – | – | 13.8 | 13.8 |
| Consideration shares | 1.0 | – | 76.6 | – | – | 77.6 |
| Share based payments | – | – | – | 1.6 | (1.6) | – |
| Equity placing and retail offer | 0.6 | 48.1 | – | – | – | 48.7 |
| Issue of new shares | – | 1.8 | – | – | – | 1.8 |
| Dividends paid | – | – | – | – | (24.0) | (24.0) |
| As at 31 March 2025 | 4.7 | 53.9 | 112.2 | (1.4) | 302.0 | 471.4 |
The notes on pages 199 to 203 form an integral part of these financial statements. There was no other income in the year therefore the profit after taxation is the Company's total comprehensive profit for the year.
The Company's separate financial statements for the year ended 31 March 2025 are prepared in accordance with Financial Reporting Standard 101 (FRS 101) "Reduced Disclosure Framework" as issued by the Financial Reporting Council and within the requirements of the Companies Act 2006. The financial statements are presented in pounds Sterling. These financial statements have been prepared under the historical cost convention.
For the Company's going concern assessment, refer to note 1 of the consolidated financial statements.
The Company has adopted the new accounting standards as set out in the accounting policies section of the Group financial statements. Adopting these new standards and amendments has not had a material impact on the Company in the current or prior years. Refer to note 1.
The Company has taken advantage of all disclosure exemptions allowed by FRS 101. These financial statements do not include:
The above disclosure exemptions have been adopted because equivalent disclosures are included in the consolidated Group accounts into which the Company is consolidated.
Investments in subsidiary undertakings are stated at cost less provision for cumulative impairments. Where an impairment has been recognised in previous periods, and the conditions that caused the impairment are no longer present, the impairment charge previously recognised will be reversed, up to the cost of the original investment value.
The Company classifies its financial assets on the basis of their contractual cash flow characteristics and the results of the business model assessment under IFRS 9. Financial assets carried amortised cost are initially recognised at fair value plus transaction costs that are directly attributable to their acquisition or issue and are subsequently carried at amortised cost, less provision for impairment. Impairment provisions for receivables are recognised based on IFRS 9 in the determination of the expected credit losses. If it is determined that a receivable will not be collectable, the gross carrying value of the asset is written off against the associated provision. If in a subsequent year the amount of the impairment loss decreased and the decrease can be related objectively to an event occurring after the impairment was recognised, the previously recognised impairment loss is reversed to the extent that the carrying value of the asset does not exceed its amortised costs at the reversal date. Financial assets at amortised cost consist of loans and receivables. The Company determines the classification of its financial assets at initial recognition. The Company's financial assets consist of cash, and loans and receivables.
Financial assets are derecognised only when the contractual rights to the cash flows from the financial asset expire or the Group transfers substantially all risks and rewards of ownership.
Financial liabilities are classified as other liabilities. A financial liability is derecognised when the obligation under the liability is discharged or cancelled or expires.
All loans and borrowings are classified as other liabilities. Initial recognition is at fair value less directly attributable transaction costs. After initial recognition, interest bearing loans and borrowings are subsequently measured at amortised cost using the effective interest method.
Financial liabilities included in trade and other payables are recognised initially at fair value and subsequently at amortised cost.
The financial instruments classified as financial liabilities at fair value through profit or loss include interest rate swap and cap arrangements. Recognition of the derivative financial instruments takes place when the contracts are entered into. They are recognised at fair value and transaction costs are included directly in finance costs.
The fair values of derivative financial liabilities are determined as follows:
Interest rate swaps and caps are measured using the midpoint of the yield curve prevailing on the reporting date. The valuations do not include accrued interest from the previous settlement date to the reporting date. The fair value represents the net present value of the difference between the contracted rate and the valuation rate when applied to the projected balances for the period from the reporting date to the contracted expiry dates.
The fair value of a non-interest bearing liability is its discounted repayment amount. If the due date of the liability is less than one year, discounting is omitted.
Shares are classified as equity when there is no obligation to transfer cash or other assets.
Dividends to the Company's shareholders are recognised when they become legally payable. In the case of interim dividends, this is when paid. In the case of final dividends, this is when approved by equity holders at a general meeting. Dividend information is provided in note 13 to the consolidated financial statements.
The merger reserve resulted from the acquisition of NewRiver Retail Limited and represents the difference between the value of the net assets acquired of £524 million and the nominal value of the shares issued, adjusted for subsequent impairments and impairment reversals in NewRiver Retail Limited following the creation of the merger reserve in 2016.
In December 2024 the Company acquired Capital and Regional. Some of the consideration was paid in equity shares of the Company. The difference between the nominal value of the shares issued and the cost of the investment was recorded in the merger reserve.
The employee benefit trust is included in the parent company financial statements.
The preparation of financial statements requires the use of certain critical accounting estimates. It also requires the Directors to exercise judgement in the process of applying the Company's accounting policies. Changes in assumptions may have a significant impact on the financial statements in the period the assumptions changed. The Directors believe that the underlying assumptions are appropriate. The only critical estimates, assumptions and judgements relate to the determination of the carrying value of the investment in the Company's subsidiary undertakings. The nature, facts and circumstance of the investment are taken into account on assessing whether there are any indications of impairment.
The carrying value of the Company's investment in subsidiaries is disclosed in note B. The Company assesses annually whether there is an indication of impairment of the investments in subsidiaries. An impairment is recognised when the recoverable amount of the investments is below their carrying amount. The recoverable amount is the higher of the value of use of investments and their fair value less costs of disposal. The fair value is generally estimated based on the current valuation of investment properties held by subsidiaries. If valuations of investment properties, excluding the newly acquired Capital & Regional investment properties, declined by 10%, the impairment in investment in subsidiaries would be £51.9 million (2024: £52.9 million).
In prior years the Company did not include the cost of disposal in the assessment of the recoverable amount. Therefore there is a prior year adjustment of £10.7 million to the opening balance of investment in subsidiaries on 1 April 2023 date to appropriately reflect the application of IAS36, thereby meaning there was a reduction of retained earnings for the same amount.
All subsidiaries are held indirectly except the companies marked* in the below listing.
| Name | Country of incorporation |
Activity | Proportion of ownership interest Class of share |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| C-store REIT Limited | UK | Dormant company | 100% | Ordinary Shares |
| Capital & Regional | ||||
| (Europe Holding 5) Limited1 | Jersey | Holding company | 100% | Ordinary Shares |
| Capital & Regional (Jersey) | ||||
| Limited1 | Jersey | Dormant company | 100% | Ordinary Shares |
| Capital & Regional (Mall GP) | ||||
| Limited | UK | Holding company | 100% | Ordinary Shares |
| Capital & Regional (Projects) | ||||
| Limited | UK | Dormant company | 100% | Ordinary Shares |
| Capital & Regional | ||||
| (Shopping Centres) Limited1 | Jersey | Holding company | 100% | Ordinary Shares |
| Capital & Regional | ||||
| Earnings Limited | UK | Holding company | 100% | Ordinary Shares |
| Capital & Regional | ||||
| Holdings Limited | UK | Holding company | 100% | Ordinary Shares |
| Capital & Regional plc* | UK | Holding company | 100% | Ordinary Shares |
| Capital & Regional Ilford Limited1 Jersey | Holding company | 100% | Ordinary Shares | |
| Real estate | ||||
| C&R Ilford Limited Partnership | UK | investments | 100% | Ordinary Shares |
| C&R Ilford Nominee 1 Limited | UK | Dormant | 100% | Ordinary Shares |
| C&R Ilford Nominee 2 Limited | UK | Dormant | 100% | Ordinary Shares |
| C&R Ilford (General Partner) | Real estate | |||
| Limited | UK | investments | 100% | Ordinary Shares |
| Capital & Regional Property | Property | |||
| Management Limited | UK | management | 100% | Ordinary Shares |
| Real estate | ||||
| C&R Retail 1 Limited | UK | investments | 100% | Ordinary Shares |
| Capital & Regional (UK Retail) | ||||
| Limited | UK | Holding company | 100% | Ordinary Shares |
| Real estate | ||||
| Ellandi LLP | UK | investments | 100% | Ordinary Shares |
| Real estate | ||||
| EML Sub No 2 Limited | UK | investments | 100% | Ordinary Shares |
| Convenience Store REIT Limited | UK | Dormant company | 100% | Ordinary Shares |
| Green-Sinfield Limited | UK | Dormant | 100% | Ordinary Shares |
| NewRiver REIT plc Annual Report and Accounts 2025 2025 |
Strategic Report | Governance Report | Financial Statements | ESG Data Sets | Glossary & | 201 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Name | Country of incorporation |
Activity | Proportion of ownership interest Class of share |
Name | Country of incorporation |
Activity | Proportion of ownership interest Class of share |
||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lancaster Court (Hove) Limited | UK | Dormant | 100% | Ordinary Shares | NewRiver Retail | Real estate | |||
| Lower Grosvenor Place London | (Darlington) Limited | UK | investments | 100% | Ordinary Shares | ||||
| One Limited | UK | Dormant | 100% | Ordinary Shares | Real estate | ||||
| Mall Nominee One Limited | UK | Dormant | 100% | Ordinary Shares | NewRiver Grays S.a.r.l* | Luxembourg | investments | 100% | Ordinary Shares |
| Mall Nominee Two Limited | UK | Dormant | 100% | Ordinary Shares | NewRiver (Grays) UK Limited* | UK | Dormant | 100% | Ordinary Shares |
| Property | NewRiver Retail (GP3) Limited | UK | General partner | 100% | Ordinary Shares | ||||
| Mall People Limited | UK | management | 100% | Ordinary Shares | NewRiver Retail (Leylands Road) | ||||
| Mall Ventures Limited | UK | Dormant | 100% | Ordinary Shares | Limited | UK | Dormant | 100% | Ordinary Shares |
| Real estate | NewRiver Retail (Market | Real estate | |||||||
| Marlowes Hemel Limited1 | Jersey | investments | 100% | Ordinary Shares | Deeping No. 1) Limited | Guernsey | investments | 100% | Ordinary Shares |
| MB Roding (Guernsey) Ltd) | Guernsey | Dormant | 100% | Ordinary Shares | NewRiver Retail | Real estate | |||
| Real estate | (Morecambe) Limited | UK | investments | 100% | Ordinary Shares | ||||
| NewRiver Capital Limited* | UK | investments | 100% | Ordinary Shares | NewRiver Retail (Nominee No.3) | ||||
| Real estate | Limited | UK | Dormant company | 100% | Ordinary Shares | ||||
| NewRiver Capital Partnerships | UK | investments | 100% | Ordinary Shares | Real estate | ||||
| NewRiver Retail (Burgess Hill) | NewRiver Retail (Paisley) Limited | UK | investments | 100% | Ordinary Shares | ||||
| Limited | UK | Dormant company | 100% | Ordinary Shares | Real estate | ||||
| Real estate | NewRiver Retail (Penge) Limited | UK | investments | 100% | Ordinary Shares | ||||
| NewRiver (Darnall) Limited | UK | investments | 100% | Ordinary Shares | NewRiver Retail (Portfolio No. 1) | Real estate | |||
| NewRiver Finance Company | Real estate | Limited | Guernsey | investments | 100% | Ordinary Shares | |||
| Limited | UK | investments | 100% | Ordinary Shares | NewRiver Retail (Portfolio No. 2) | Real estate | |||
| NewRiver REIT (UK) Limited | UK | Asset management | 100% | Ordinary Shares | Limited | Guernsey | investments | 100% | Ordinary Shares |
| NewRiver Retail (Bexleyheath) | Group holding | NewRiver Retail (Portfolio No. 3) Limited |
UK | Holding company | 100% | Ordinary Shares | |||
| Holdings Limited | UK | company | 100% | Ordinary Shares | |||||
| NewRiver Retail (Bexleyheath) | Real estate | NewRiver Retail (Portfolio No. 3) Limited Partnership |
UK | Real estate investments |
100% | Partnership | |||
| Limited | Jersey | investments | 100% | Ordinary Shares | NewRiver Retail (Portfolio No. 4) | Real estate | |||
| NewRiver Retail | Limited | UK | investments | 100% | Ordinary Shares | ||||
| (Broadway Square) UK Limited | UK | Dormant | 100% | Ordinary Shares | NewRiver Retail (Portfolio No. 5) | Real estate | |||
| NewRiver Retail (Bexleyheath) | Limited | UK | investments | 100% | Ordinary Shares | ||||
| UK Limited | UK | Dormant | 100% | Ordinary Shares | NewRiver Retail (Portfolio No. 6) | Real estate | |||
| NewRiver Retail (Boscombe No. 1) Limited |
UK | Real estate investments |
100% | Ordinary Shares | Limited | UK | investments | 100% | Ordinary Shares |
| NewRiver Retail | Real estate | NewRiver Retail (Portfolio No. 8) | Real estate | ||||||
| (Broadway Square) Limited | Jersey | investments | 100% | Ordinary Shares | Limited | UK | investments | 100% | Ordinary Shares |
| Real estate | NewRiver Retail (Ramsay | Real estate | |||||||
| NewRiver Retail (Cardiff) Limited | UK | investments | 100% | Ordinary Shares | Development) Limited | UK | investments | 100% | Ordinary Shares |
| NewRiver Retail | Real estate | NewRiver Retail (Ramsay | Real estate | ||||||
| (Carmarthen) Limited | UK | investments | 100% | Ordinary Shares | Investment) Limited | UK | investments | 100% | Ordinary Shares |
Company Information
| NewRiver REIT plc Annual Report and Accounts 2025 2025 |
Strategic Report | Governance Report | Financial Statements | ESG Data Sets & Appendix |
Glossary & Company Information |
202 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Name | Country of incorporation |
Activity | Proportion of ownership interest Class of share |
Name | Country of incorporation |
Activity | Proportion of ownership interest Class of share |
||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NewRiver Retail (Skegness) | Real estate | NewRiver Retail Property Unit | Real estate | ||||||
| Limited | UK | investments | 100% | Ordinary Shares | Trust No. 6 | Jersey | investments | 100% | Ordinary units |
| NewRiver Retail (Wakefield) | Real estate | NewRiver Retail Property Unit | Real estate | ||||||
| Limited | UK | investments | 100% | Ordinary Shares | Trust No. 7 | Jersey | investments | 100% | Ordinary units |
| NewRiver Retail | Real estate | Selborne One Limited | UK | Dormant | 100% | Ordinary Shares | |||
| (Warminster) Limited | UK | investments | 100% | Ordinary Shares | Selborne Two Limited | UK | Dormant | 100% | Ordinary Shares |
| NewRiver Retail (Wisbech) | Real estate | Selborne Walthamstow Limited1 Jersey | Dormant | 100% | Ordinary Shares | ||||
| Limited | UK | investments | 100% | Ordinary Shares | Seventeen Social Space Limited | UK | Operation of food hall100% | Ordinary Shares | |
| NewRiver Retail | Real estate | Shopping Centre REIT Limited | UK | Dormant company | 100% | Ordinary Shares | |||
| (Witham) Limited | UK | investments | 100% | Ordinary Shares | |||||
| NewRiver Retail | Real estate | Snozone Holdings Limited | UK | Holding company | 100% | Ordinary Shares | |||
| (Wrexham No.1) Limited | Guernsey | investments | 100% | Ordinary Shares | Operator of indoor ski | ||||
| NewRiver Retail (Portfolio No. 10) | Real estate | Snowzone S.L.U3 | Spain | slopes | 100% | Ordinary Shares | |||
| Limited | UK | investments | 100% | Ordinary Shares | Operator of indoor ski | ||||
| NewRiver Retail | Group holding | Ocio y Nieve S.L.U | Spain | slopes | 100% | Ordinary Shares | |||
| Holdings Limited | Guernsey | company | 100% | Ordinary Shares | Operator of indoor ski | ||||
| NewRiver Retail Holdings No. 1 | Group holding | Snozone Leisure Limited | UK | slopes | 100% | Ordinary Shares | |||
| Limited | Guernsey | company | 100% | Ordinary Shares | |||||
| NewRiver Retail Holdings No. 2 | Group holding | Snozone Limited | UK | Holding company | 100% | Ordinary Shares | |||
| Limited | Guernsey | company | 100% | Ordinary Shares | The Mall (General Partner) | ||||
| NewRiver Retail Holdings No. 3 | Group holding | Limited | UK | Property investment | 100% | Ordinary Shares | |||
| Limited | Guernsey | company | 100% | Ordinary Shares | The Mall Limited Partnership | UK | Property investment | 100% | Ordinary Shares |
| NewRiver Retail Holdings No. 5 | Group holding | The Mall REIT Limited | UK | Dormant | 100% | Ordinary Shares | |||
| Limited | Guernsey | company | 100% | Ordinary Shares | The Mall Shopping Centres | ||||
| NewRiver Retail Holdings No. 6 | Group holding | Limited | UK | Dormant | 100% | Ordinary Shares | |||
| Limited | Guernsey | company | 100% | Ordinary Shares | The Mall Walthamstow One | ||||
| NewRiver Retail Limited* | Guernsey | Group holding company |
100% | Ordinary Shares | Limited | UK | Dormant | 100% | Ordinary Shares |
| Real estate | The Mall Walthamstow | ||||||||
| NewRiver Retail Limited | UK | investments | 100% | Ordinary units | Two Limited | UK | Dormant | 100% | Ordinary Shares |
| NewRiver Retail Property Unit | Real estate | Wood Green London Limited1 | Jersey | Dormant | 100% | Ordinary Shares | |||
| Trust | Jersey | investments | 100% | Ordinary units | Wood Green One Limited | UK | Dormant | 100% | Ordinary Shares |
| NewRiver Retail Property Unit | Real estate | Wood Green Two Limited | UK | Dormant | 100% | Ordinary Shares | |||
| Trust No. 2 | Jersey | investments | 100% | Ordinary units | Principal associate entities | ||||
| NewRiver Retail Property Unit | Real estate | Euro B-Note Holding Limited1 | Jersey | Finance | 39.90 | Ordinary Shares | |||
| Trust No. 3 | Jersey | investments | 100% | Ordinary units | 1. Registered office at 47 The Esplanade, St Helier, Jersey JE1 0BD. | ||||
| NewRiver Retail Property Unit | Real estate | 2. Registered office at PO Box 186, Royal Chambers, St Julian's Avenue, St Peter Port, Guernsey GY1 4HP. | |||||||
| Trust No. 5 | Jersey | investments | 100% | Ordinary units | 3. Registered office at Pista de Nieve en el Centro Comercial Madrid Xanadü,, Ctra. A5. Salidas 22 y 25, km 23, |

Unless stated otherwise, all UK incorporated companies have their registered offices at 89 Whitfield Street, London, W1T 4DE. Unless stated otherwise, all Jersey incorporated companies have their registered offices at 13 Castle Street, St Helier, Jersey, Channel Islands, JE4 5UT. Unless stated otherwise, all Guernsey incorporated companies have their registered offices at Floor 2 Trafalgar Court, Les Banques, St Peter Port, GY1 4LY. All Luxembourg incorporated companies have their registered offices at 5, Heienhaff L-1736 Senningerberg.
The Company's investments in joint ventures and associates are detailed in notes 15/16. The registered offices of the companies are:
Guernsey – NewRiver Retail (GP1) Ltd, Floor 2 Trafalgar Court, Les Banques, St Peter Port, GY1 4LY
UK – NewRiver Retail (Sprucefield) Limited, 89 Whitfield Street, London, W1T 4DE
UK – NewRiver Retail (Hamilton) Limited, 89 Whitfield Street, London, W1T 4DE
Reconciliation of the movement in investment in subsidiaries:
| 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|
| £m | £m | |
| Opening balance (as previously stated) | 311.2 | 323.9 |
| Restated | – | (10.7) |
| Opening balance (restated) | – | 313.2 |
| Capital & Regional investment1 | 159.4 | – |
| Reversal / (impairment) in subsidiaries | 16.5 | (2.0) |
| Investment in subsidiaries | 487.1 | 311.2 |
The Company has recognised a net reversal of impairment of £16.5 million which relates to an impairment of £0.2 million in relation to the Group's joint ventures, offset by a reversal in the impairment of other investments of £16.7 million (2024: £2.0 million impairment) to reflect the increase in the recoverable amount of the Company's investment.
The Company's distributable reserves as at 31 March 2025 were £181.6 million (31 March 2024: £209.9 million).
The auditors' remuneration in respect of the Company is disclosed in note 6 of the consolidated financial statements.
| 2025 £m |
2024 £m |
|
|---|---|---|
| Non-current – Amounts owed from subsidiary undertakings * | 219.4 | 211.9 |
| Current – Amounts owed from subsidiary undertakings | 171.0 | |
| 195.9 415.3 |
382.9 |
* Includes an expected credit loss impairment provision of £0.2 million (2024: £0.3 million)
Non-current amounts owed by subsidiary undertakings have repayment dates beyond 12 months, are unsecured and bear interest that reflects market rates.
Current amounts owed by subsidiaries undertakings are unsecured, interest free and repayable on demand.
| 2025 £m |
2024 £m |
|
|---|---|---|
| Trade creditors | – | 0.1 |
| Accruals | 2.7 | 2.1 |
| Amounts owed to subsidiary undertakings | 165.5 | 159.1 |
| 168.2 | 161.3 |
Amounts owed to subsidiary undertakings are unsecured, interest free and repayable on demand.
All borrowings issued by the Group at 31 March 2025 were issued by the Company. See note 21 of the consolidated financial statements for details.
Glossary & Company Information
In addition to information contained in the Group financial statements, Alternative Performance Measures ('APMs'), being financial measures which are not specified under IFRS, are also used by management to assess the Group's performance. These APMs include a number of European Public Real Estate Association ('EPRA') measures, prepared in accordance with the EPRA Best Practice Recommendations reporting framework. We report these because management considers them to improve the transparency and relevance of our published results as well as the comparability with other listed European real estate companies.
The table below identifies the APMs used in this statement and provides the nearest IFRS measure where applicable, and where in this statement an explanation and reconciliation can be found.
| APM | Nearest IFRS measure | Explanation and reconciliation |
|---|---|---|
| Profit / (Loss) for the | ||
| Underlying Funds From Operations ('UFFO') and UFFO per share | period after taxation | Note 12 of the Financial Statements |
| EPRA Net Tangible Assets ('NTA') and EPRA NTA per share | Net Assets | Note 12 of the Financial Statements |
| Dividend cover | N/A | 'Financial Policies' section of the 'Finance Review' |
| Admin cost ratio | N/A | Note 6 of the Financial Statements |
| Interest cover | N/A | Glossary |
| Net debt: EBITDA ratio | N/A | Glossary |
| EPRA EPS | IFRS Basic EPS | Note 12 of the Financial Statements |
| EPRA NIY | N/A | 'EPRA performance measures' section of this document |
| EPRA 'topped-up' NIY | N/A | 'EPRA performance measures' section of this document |
| EPRA Vacancy Rate | N/A | 'EPRA performance measures' section of this document |
| Total Accounting Return | N/A | Glossary |
| Total Property Return | N/A | Glossary |
| Weighted average cost of debt | N/A | 'Financial Policies' section of the 'Finance review' |
| Weighted average debt maturity | N/A | 'Financial Policies' section of the 'Finance review' |
| Loan to Value | N/A | 'Financial Policies' section of the 'Finance review' |

The information in this section is unaudited and does not form part of the consolidated primary statements of the company or the notes thereto.
Below we disclose financial performance measures in accordance with the European Public Real Estate Association ('EPRA') Best Practice Recommendations which are aimed at improving the transparency, consistency and relevance of reporting across European Real Estate companies.
This section sets out the rationale for each performance measure as well as how it is measured. A summary of the performance measures is included in the following tables
| FY25 | FY24 | |
|---|---|---|
| EPRA Earnings Per Share (EPS) | 7.5p | 7.4p |
| EPRA Cost Ratio (including direct vacancy costs) | 41.7% | 36.9% |
| EPRA Cost Ratio (excluding direct vacancy costs) | 38.9% | 33.8% |
| March 2025 | March 2024 | |
|---|---|---|
| EPRA NRV per share | 115p | 127p |
| EPRA NTA per share | 102p | 115p |
| EPRA NDV per share | 107p | 123p |
| EPRA LTV | 46.1% | 34.1% |
| EPRA NIY | 6.8% | 7.1% |
| EPRA 'topped-up' NIY | 7.1% | 7.5% |
| EPRA Vacancy Rate | 3.9% | 2.1% |
Earnings from operational activities
A key measure of a company's underlying operating results and an indication of the extent to which current dividend payments are supported by earnings
& Appendix
Company Information
| FY25 £m |
FY24 £m |
|
|---|---|---|
| Earnings per IFRS income statement | 23.7 | 3.0 |
| Adjustments to calculate EPRA Earnings, exclude: | ||
| Changes in value of investment properties, development properties held for | ||
| investment and other investment interests | (2.1) | 13.9 |
| Deferred tax | 3.0 | – |
| Profits or losses on disposal of investment properties, development | ||
| properties held for investment and other investment interests | 0.9 | 6.1 |
| Adjustments related to non-operating and exceptional items* | 3.0 | – |
| Adjustments to above in respect of joint ventures (unless already included | ||
| under proportional consolidation) | (0.1) | (0.1) |
| EPRA Earnings | 28.4 | 22.9 |
| Basic number of shares | 376.3m | 311.4m |
| EPRA Earnings per Share (EPS) | 7.5p | 7.4p |
* Adjustments related to non-operating and exceptional items include £0.7 million expenses relating to the acquisition of Ellandi, £0.3 million amortisation of the intangible asset recognised on the acquisition of Ellandi, £0.9 million write off of unamortised costs following repayment of three Capital & Regional secured debt facilities totalling £59 million immediately post transaction completion and £1.1 million net costs in relation to unlocking expected net cost synergies following the acquisition of Capital & Regional
| NewRiver REIT plc Annual Report and Accounts 2025 2025 |
Strategic Report | Governance Report | Financial Statements | ESG Data Sets & Appendix |
Glossary & Company Information |
206 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FY25 £m |
FY24 £m |
|
|---|---|---|
| EPRA Earnings | 28.4 | 22.9 |
| Share-based payment charge | 1.5 | 1.5 |
| Forward-looking element of IFRS 9 | 0.1 | – |
| Snozone amortisation and depreciation | 0.7 | – |
| Snozone lease liability interest | (0.2) | – |
| Underlying Funds From Operations (UFFO) | 30.5 | 24.4 |
| Basic number of shares | 376.3m | 311.4m |
| UFFO per share | 8.1p | 7.8p |
EPRA NRV per share: 115p; EPRA NTA per share: 102p; EPRA NDV per share: 107p
Net Asset Value adjusted to include properties and other investment interests at fair value and to exclude certain items not expected to crystallise in a long-term investment property business model.
Makes adjustments to IFRS NAV to provide stakeholders with the most relevant information on the fair value of the assets and liabilities within a true real estate investment company with a long-term investment strategy.
| 31 March 2025 | EPRA NRV £m |
EPRA NTA £m |
EPRA NDV £m |
|---|---|---|---|
| IFRS Equity attributable to shareholders | 490.1 | 490.1 | 490.1 |
| Fair value of financial instruments | – | – | – |
| Deferred tax in relation to fair value gains of Investment Property | 0.9 | 0.9 | – |
| Fair value of debt | – | – | 23.6 |
| Goodwill | – | (3.6) | – |
| Intangible asset | – | (0.9) | – |
| Purchasers' costs | 60.1 | – | – |
| EPRA NRV / NTA / NDV | 551.1 | 486.5 | 513.7 |
| Fully diluted number of shares | 478.9 | 478.9 | 478.9 |
| EPRA NRV / NTA / NDV per share | 115p | 102p | 107p |
| 31 March 2024 | EPRA NRV £m |
EPRA NTA £m |
EPRA NDV £m |
|---|---|---|---|
| IFRS Equity attributable to shareholders | 361.1 | 361.1 | 361.1 |
| Fair value of financial instruments | (0.1) | (0.1) | – |
| Deferred tax in relation to fair value gains of Investment Property | 0.8 | 0.8 | – |
| Fair value of debt | – | – | 24.5 |
| Purchasers' costs | 36.8 | – | – |
| EPRA NRV / NTA / NDV | 398.6 | 361.8 | 385.6 |
| Fully diluted number of shares | 313.3m | 313.3m | 313.3m |
| EPRA NRV / NTA / NDV per share | 127p | 115p | 123p |

EPRA LTV is the ratio of gross debt, net payables less cash and cash equivalents to the aggregate value of properties. LTV is expressed on a proportionally consolidated basis.
EPRA LTV introduces a consistent and comparable metric for the real estate sector, with the aim to assess the gearing of the shareholder equity within a real estate investment company.
| 31 March 2025 | Group £m |
Share of Joint Ventures £m |
Share of Associates £m |
Total £m |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Borrowings from financial institutions | – | – | (4.3) | (4.3) |
| Corporate bond | (300.0) | – | – | (300.0) |
| Mall facility | (140.0) | – | – | (140.0) |
| Net (payables) / receivables | (31.3) | – | (0.3) | (31.6) |
| Cash and cash equivalents | 61.3 | – | 0.8 | 62.1 |
| Net Debt (A) | (410.0) | – | (3.8) | (413.8) |
| Investment property at fair value | 887.5 | – | 10.0 | 897.5 |
| Total Property Value (B) | 887.5 | – | 10.0 | 897.5 |
| EPRA LTV (A/B)* | 46.2% | 46.1%* |
* EPRA LTV reduced to c.42.5% proforma for the £59 million post balance sheet disposal of the Abbey Centre, Newtownabbey
| 31 March 2024 | Group £m |
Share of Joint Ventures £m |
Share of Associates £m |
Total £m |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Borrowings from financial institutions | – | – | (4.0) | (4.0) |
| Corporate bond | (300.0) | – | – | (300.0) |
| Net (payables) / receivables | (14.9) | 0.1 | (0.1) | (14.9) |
| Cash and cash equivalents | 132.8 | – | 0.4 | 133.2 |
| Net Debt (A) | (182.1) | 0.1 | (3.7) | (185.7) |
| Investment property at fair value | 533.8 | – | 10.0 | 543.8 |
| Total Property Value (B) | 533.8 | – | 10.0 | 543.8 |
| EPRA LTV (A/B) | 34.1% | 34.1% |
The basic EPRA NIY calculates the annualised rental income based on the cash rents passing at the balance sheet date, less non-recoverable property operating expenses, divided by the market value of the property, increased with (estimated) purchasers' costs.
In respect of the 'topped-up' NIY, an adjustment to the EPRA NIY in respect of the expiration of rent-free periods (or other unexpired lease incentives such as discounted rent periods and step rents).
A comparable measure for portfolio valuations to assist investors in comparing portfolios.
| March 2025 £m |
March 2024 £m |
||
|---|---|---|---|
| Properties at valuation – wholly owned | 887.5 | 533.8 | |
| Properties at valuation – share of Joint Ventures & Associates | 10.0 | 10.0 | |
| Trading property (including share of Joint Ventures & Associates) | – | – | |
| Less: Developments | (10.0) | (10.0) | |
| Completed property portfolio | 887.5 | 533.8 | |
| Allowance for estimated purchasers' costs and capital expenditure | 90.8 | 40.5 | |
| Grossed up completed property portfolio valuation | B | 978.3 | 574.3 |
| Annualised cash passing rental income | 85.0 | 50.9 | |
| Property outgoings | (18.5) | (10.0) | |
| Annualised net rents | A | 66.5 | 40.9 |
| Add: Notional rent expiration of rent free periods or other lease incentives | 2.7 | 2.4 | |
| Topped-up net annualised rent | C | 69.2 | 43.3 |
| EPRA NIY | A/B | 6.8% | 7.1% |
| EPRA 'topped-up' NIY | C/B | 7.1% | 7.5% |

Estimated Market Rental Value (ERV) of vacant space divided by ERV of the whole portfolio, excluding development assets.
A 'pure' (%) measure of investment property space that is vacant, based on ERV.
| March 2025 £m |
March 2024 £m |
||
|---|---|---|---|
| Estimated Rental Value of vacant retail space | A | 2.9 | 1.0 |
| Estimated Rental Value of total portfolio retail space | B | 74.4 | 47.8 |
| EPRA Vacancy Rate | A/B | 3.9% | 2.1% |
The EPRA vacancy rate is based on the ratio of the aggregated estimated market rent for vacant retail units versus aggregated estimated market rent for all retail units in the portfolio, excluding properties under development and any units that are not classified as retail units (e.g. commercialisation activations and car parks). There are no significant distorting factors influencing the EPRA vacancy rate.
Administrative & operating costs (including & excluding costs of direct vacancy) divided by gross rental income.
A key measure to enable meaningful measurement of the changes in a company's operating costs.
| FY25 £m |
FY24 £m |
||
|---|---|---|---|
| Administrative/operating expenses per IFRS | 25.9 | 18.2 | |
| Net service charge costs/fees | 5.6 | 4.0 | |
| Management fees less actual/estimated profit element | (6.2) | (2.5) | |
| Share of Joint Ventures and associates expenses (net of other income) Exclude (if part of the above): |
0.2 | 0.1 | |
| Ground rent costs | 0.7 | 0.4 | |
| EPRA Costs (including direct vacancy costs)* | A | 26.2* | 20.2 |
| Direct vacancy costs | (1.8) | (1.7) | |
| EPRA Costs (excluding direct vacancy costs)* | B | 24.4* | 18.5 |
| Gross Rental Income less ground rents – per IFRS | 62.0 | 53.3 | |
| Add: share of Joint Ventures and associates (Gross Rental Income | |||
| less ground rents) | 0.8 | 1.5 | |
| EPRA Gross Rental Income | C | 62.8 | 54.8 |
| EPRA Cost Ratio (including direct vacancy costs)* | A/C | 41.7%* | 36.9% |
| EPRA Cost Ratio (excluding direct vacancy costs)* | B/C | 38.9%* | 33.8% |
* EPRA definition of costs includes £0.7 million exceptional expenses relating to the acquisition of Ellandi, £0.3 million amortisation of the intangible asset recognised on the acquisition of Ellandi and £1.1 million net costs in relation to unlocking expected net cost synergies following the acquisition of Capital & Regional. Excluding these items EPRA Cost Ratio (including direct vacancy costs) and EPRA Cost Ratio (excluding direct vacancy costs) would be 38.4% and 35.5% respectively.
In the current and prior year, employee costs in relation to staff time on development projects have been capitalised into the base cost of relevant development assets.

| FY25 £m |
FY24 £m |
||
|---|---|---|---|
| EPRA Costs (including direct vacancy costs) | A | 26.2 | 20.2 |
| Exclude: | |||
| Ground rent costs | (0.7) | (0.4) | |
| Exceptional costs1 | (0.7) | – | |
| Amortisation of intangibles2 | (0.3) | – | |
| Costs to unlock3 | (1.1) | – | |
| Share of Joint Ventures and associates property expenses (net of other income) |
(0.2) | – | |
| Other operating income/recharges intended to cover overhead expenses less any related profits |
– | – | |
| Net service charge costs | (5.6) | (4.0) | |
| Operating expenses (excluding service charge cost) | (7.4) | (5.8) | |
| Tenant incentives (included within income) | (0.2) | (0.2) | |
| Letting & legal costs (included within income) | (1.3) | (1.3) | |
| Group's share of net administrative expenses as per IFRS | D | 8.7 | 8.5 |
| EPRA Gross Rental Income | C | 62.6 | 54.8 |
| Ground rent costs | (0.7) | (0.4) | |
| Expected credit reversal | 0.4 | 0.1 | |
| Surrender premiums and commissions | (0.6) | (0.7) | |
| Other income | – | 0.4 | |
| Property rental, other income and related income as per IFRS | E | 61.7 | 54.2 |
| Administrative cost ratio as per IFRS | D/E | 14.1% | 15.7% |
Exceptional costs comprise acquisition costs relating to the acquisition of Ellandi
Amortisation of intangibles relates to the amortisation of the intangible asset recognised on the acquisition of Ellandi
Costs to unlock comprise net costs in relation to unlocking expected net cost synergies following the acquisition of Capital & Regional e.g. redundancy and head office costs
| Year ended 31 March 2025 | Year ended 31 March 2024 | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Group £m |
JVs & Associates £m |
Total Group £m |
Group £m |
JVs & Associates £m |
Total Group £m |
||
| Acquisitions through the | |||||||
| Capital & Regional transaction1 | 344.7 | – | 344.7 | – | – | – | |
| Development | 0.2 | – | 0.2 | 0.2 | – | 0.2 | |
| Investment properties | |||||||
| Incremental lettable space | 2.2 | 0.2 | 2.4 | 2.8 | – | 2.8 | |
| Non incremental lettable space | 0.5 | – | 0.5 | 1.9 | – | 1.9 | |
| Capital contributions and tenant incentives2 |
1.9 | – | 1.9 | 1.0 | – | 1.0 | |
| Other material non-allocated | |||||||
| types of expenditure3 | 5.0 | – | 5.0 | – | – | – | |
| Capitalised interest | – | – | – | – | – | – | |
| Total property related capital expenditure and tenant incentives |
354.5 | 0.2 | 354.7 | 5.9 | – | 5.9 | |
| Non-cash components of the | |||||||
| Capital & Regional transaction1 | (288.7) | – | (288.7) | ||||
| Conversion from accrual to cash basis | (0.1) | – | (0.1) | 0.2 | – | 0.2 | |
| Total property related capital expenditure and tenant incentives on |
|||||||
| cash basis | 65.7 | 0.2 | 65.9 | 6.1 | – | 6.1 |
Acquisitions of £344.7 million (FY24: £nil) in the year comprise six investment properties acquired through the Capital & Regional transaction, funded by £81.8 million cash paid for the acquisition (including transaction costs) net of £(25.8) million cash acquired from the acquisition, with Non cash components of the transaction comprising £(77.6) million Share consideration, £(199.0) million Bank loans and £(12.1) million Other net assets and liabilities – see note 17 for further details
Capital contributions and tenant incentives above includes Tenant incentives of £0.3 million (2024: £0.8 million) paid during the year net of associated amortisation of £(0.2) million (2024: £(0.2) million) recognised in the consolidated statement of comprehensive income
Other material non-allocated types of expenditure of £5.0 million (2024: £nil) above relates to two new 999-year headleases acquired at Bexleyheath providing far great flexibility for re-development
Refurbishment expenditure in respect of major works is capitalised whilst renovation and refurbishment expenditure of a revenue nature is expensed as incurred. Our business model for major works and developments is to use a combination of in-house staff and external advisers. The cost of external advisers is capitalised to the cost of major works and developments and employee costs in relation to in-house staff time on major works and developments are capitalised into the base cost of relevant assets subject to meeting certain criteria related to the degree of time spent on and the nature of specific projects. Staff costs amounting to £0.3 million (2024: £0.5 million) have been capitalised as such during the year.
ESG Appendix continued
Calendar year 2024
Corporate Environmental Performance Measures provide insight on the environmental impact of our occupation of our office space.
Corporate emissions arising from our offices increased by 15% in FY25, reflective of the increase in our head count following our acquisition of Ellandi in July 2024. The growth of our team was also reflected in our water consumption and waste generation figures, which increased 20% and 30% respectively. Despite this increase in overall waste generation, we were pleased to achieve a 19% increase in our recycling rate, helping to mitigate the impact of our increased waste volume.
Strategic Report
The most significant change was in employee commuting (not included in below figures but captured in our SECR disclosure), whereby the average emissions per head increased 36%, driven by a 22% increase in distance travelled. NewRiver employees continue to make sustainable travel choices with over 81% of commute miles being via rail services.
All data presented in this disclosure has been verified under ISO 14064-3:2019 by Consult Sustainability.
| Absolute Performance (Abs) | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EPRA Code | Performance Measure | Unit(s) of measure | % of data estimation | FY24 | FY25 | % Change | |
| Elec-Abs | Electricity consumption | Annual kWh | 0% | 29,446 | 33,892 | 15% | |
| DH&C-Abs | District heating & cooling | Annual kWh | Our corporate offices are not connected to district heating & cooling | ||||
| Fuels-Abs | Fuel consumption | Annual kWh | 0% 0 |
0 | 0% | ||
| Energy-Int | Energy intensity | kWhelec/m2/yr | 0% | 77 | 89 | 15% | |
| GHG-Dir-Abs | Scope 1 emissions | Kg CO2e | 0% | 0 | 0 | 0% | |
| Scope 2 emissions (location-based) | Kg CO2e | 0% | 6,097 | 7,017 | 15% | ||
| GHG-Indir-Abs | Scope 2 emissions (market-based) | Kg CO2e | 0% | 0 | 0 | 0% | |
| Scope 3 emissions1 | Tonnes CO2e | 0% | 1,540 | 1,732 | 12% | ||
| GHG-Int | Scope 1 and 2 emissions | Kg CO2e/ m2/ year | 0% | 16 | 18 | 15% | |
| Water-Abs | Water consumption | Annual m3 | 0% | 38 | 45 | 20% | |
| Water-Int | Water intensity | M3 consumption/ m2 | 0% | 0.10 | 0.12 | 20% | |
| Waste | Kg total waste | Kg | 0% | 2,964 | 3,867 | 30% | |
| % total waste | |||||||
| Recycling rate2 | recycled | 0% | 60% | 71% | 19% |
Scope 3 emissions as presented above include the emissions associated with our occupation of our corporate offices, and so include water consumption, waste generation, and indirect emissions from our consumption of energy.
Consistent with the approach of our waste contractor, recycling rate calculations include the segregation and separate treatment of food waste and coffee grounds within recycled waste.
& Appendix
Glossary & Company Information
| NewRiver REIT plc Annual Report and Accounts 2025 | Strategic Report | Governance Report | Financial Statements | ESG Data Sets & Appendix |
Glossary & Company Information |
211 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ESG Appendix continued | ||||||
Portfolio Environmental Performance Measures provide insight on the environmental impact of NewRiver's property portfolio over which we have operational control. Please see pages 75, 78 and 80-81 of this report for detailed commentary on the performance trends observed within this dataset. All data presented in this disclosure has been verified under ISO 14064-3:2019 by Consult Sustainability.
| EPRA Code | Performance Measure | Unit(s) of measure | % of data estimation | Absolute Performance (Abs) | Like-for-like Performance (LfL) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FY24 | FY25 | FY24 | FY25 | % Change | |||||
| Elec-Abs, Elec-LfL | Electricity consumption | Annual MWh | 1.4% | 8,188 | 7,213 | 6,372 | 6,415 | 1% | |
| DH&C-Abs & LfL | District heating & cooling | Annual MWh | None of our properties were connected to or benefitted from district heating & cooling | ||||||
| Fuels-Abs,Fuels-LfL | Fuel consumption | Annual MWh | 4.0% | 2,708 | 2,356 | 2,387 | 2,224 | -7% | |
| Energy-Int | Energy intensity | kWhelec-eq/m2/yr | – | 62 | 64 | 62 | 64 | 3% | |
| GHG-Dir-Abs | Scope 1 emissions | Tonnes CO2e | 495 | 431 | 437 | 407 | -7% | ||
| GHG-Indir-Abs | Scope 2 emissions (location-based) | Tonnes CO2e | Emissions are calculated based on the | 1,695 | 1,494 | 1,319 | 1,328 | 1% | |
| Scope 2 emissions (market-based) | Tonnes CO2e | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0% | |||
| Scope 3 emissions | Tonnes CO2e | conversion of all other data points in this disclosure table8 |
574 | 469 | 463 | 424 | -8% | ||
| Tonnes CO2e/ m2/ | |||||||||
| GHG-Int | Scope 1 and 2 emissions | year | 0.013 | 0.014 | 0.011 | 0.012 | 16% | ||
| Water-Abs, Water-LfL | Water consumption | Annual m3 | 1.1% | 65,602 | 58,363 | 53,435 | 57,443 | 8% | |
| Water-Int | Water intensity | m3 consumption / m2 | – | 0.40 | 0.42 | 0.32 | 0.41 | 27% | |
| Tonnes total waste | Tonnes | 1.2% | 2,887 | 2,761 | 2,615 | 2,691 | 3% | ||
| Waste-Abs, | Tonnes diverted from landfill | Tonnes | 1.2% | 2,887 | 2,761 | 2,615 | 2,691 | 3% | |
| Waste-LfL | Tonnes waste to energy | Tonnes | 0.7% | 1,173 | 1,321 | 1,121 | 1,300 | 16% | |
| Tonnes recycling | Tonnes | 1.9% | 1,505 | 1,224 | 1,458 | 1,174 | -19% | ||
| Cert-ToT | Type and number of sustainably certified assets |
Total number by certification/ rating/ labelling scheme |
We certified 10 no. assets to the WELL Health-Safety Rating standard, with 9 no. remaining in our portfolio by the end of the reporting period. This standard does not have levelled ratings within it. Please also see page 212 for a detailed breakdown of energy performance certificate ratings. |
Data coverage and comparability: the figures reported against each performance measure represent 100% of the assets within our Operational Control reporting boundary. Like-for-like figures include only those properties that remained in our portfolio for the full 12 months of both of the above reporting periods. Whilst they are like-for-like in that they relate to the same assets over comparable full 12-month periods, they include consumption from both landlord common areas and vacant & rates mitigation spaces, which vary year-on-year. Because of this high degree of variation, the floor areas for these spaces are not utilised in the intensity metric calculations. The like-for-like increases disclosed above are due to fluctuations arising from these spaces. Like-for-like common area electricity consumption reduced by 2%, while gas consumption remained stable.
Normalisation: Intensity indicators for energy, water and waste are based on relevant floor area (landlord-controlled common parts). Elec-eq is calculated using the latest REEB conversion factor.
Scope 3 emissions relate to the emissions included in our 2040 net-zero target, which are those arising from the directly controlled areas of our assets (i.e., waste, water, and upstream emissions and transmission & distribution losses from energy consumption). We have chosen to include these categories only to provide a clear performance comparison, as all other Scope 3 categories are otherwise difficult to distinguish when collated with "downstream leased assets". FY24 absolute scope 3 emissions were erroneously reported as 581 tonnes in our FY24 report due to a formula error; this has been corrected and re-stated above as 574 tonnes.
Absolute and like-for-like asset-level performance measures include only landlord-procured energy/water. This does not include sub-metered energy procured on behalf of occupiers on inclusive leases, which amounted to 17,965 kWh in 2024 (electricity only), and which is accounted for in the Scope 3 emissions category of "downstream leased assets" reported within our SECR disclosure on page 76.
"Estimation" refers to filling invoice gaps, not to whether invoices are based on "estimated" or "actual" readings. Although a vast majority of the data presented is based on actual consumption, in the instances where there were gaps in energy and water consumption, the average of the months where we had data was applied to the missing months. The same approach was applied to waste generation data, in some cases drawing on the previous year's data where required. % estimations disclosed relate to the current reporting year figures only.
Segmental analysis: As our portfolio is comprised of entirely retail properties within the UK only, we have not undertaken segmental analysis.
Verification: Our environmental performance data has been verified by Consult Sustainability as part of our GHG inventory.
Applies to EPRA Codes GHG-Dir-Abs, GHG-Indir-Abs, GHG-Int.
NewRiver REIT plc | Annual Report and Accounts 2025 Governance Report Financial Statements ESG Data Sets 212 & Appendix Glossary & Company Information Strategic Report
ESG Appendix continued
In the below table, the number of certificates across our portfolio is presented by asset rating, A+ through to G, including the Capital & Regional assets. We have provided England & Wales separately to Scotland & Northern Ireland, as MEES is in effect in England & Wales. We have also disclosed the number of units with no/expired EPCs to provide clarity on certification coverage across the portfolio. EPC coverage is currently 72%, down slightly from 77% last year. This is because of the incorporation of our new assets (Capital & Regional portfolio) into our calculations. This also excludes recently sold assets for which we acquired new EPCs for the purposes of sale.
| Region | A+ | A | B | C | D | E | F | G No/ Expired EPC | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| England & Wales | 0 | 14 | 354 | 282 | 192 | 58 | 0 | 0 | 280 |
| Scotland & Northern Ireland | 0 | 8 | 12 | 30 | 18 | 26 | 19 | 24 | 116 |
| Total | 0 | 22 | 366 | 312 | 210 | 84 | 19 | 24 | 396 |
| EPRA Code | Performance Measure | Unit(s) of Measure | Boundary | FY24 | FY25 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| H&S-Asset | Asset health and safety assessments | Percentage of assets | Managed Assets |
100% | 100% |
| Asset health and safety compliance | Number of incidents in reporting year |
Managed Assets |
0 | 0 | |
| H&S-Comp | Development and major refurbishment project health and safety compliance |
Number of incidents over past 3 years |
Managed Assets |
0 | – |
| Comty-Eng | Community engagement, impact assessments and development programmes |
Percentage of assets | Managed Assets |
100% | 100% |
| NewRiver REIT plc Annual Report and Accounts 2025 | |
|---|---|
| NewRiver REIT plc Annual Report and Accounts 2025 | Strategic Report | Governance Report | Financial Statements | ESG Data Sets & Appendix |
Glossary & Company Information |
213 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ESG Appendix continued
| EPRA Code | Performance Measure | Unit(s) of Measure | Boundary | FY24 | FY25 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Diversity-Emp | Employee gender diversity | Percentage of employees, Board diversity | NewRiver Board | 29% female/71% male | 29% female/71% Male |
| Percentage of employees, All employee gender diversity | 50% female/50% male | 49% female/ 51% male | |||
| 77% White/ 13% | 79% White/ | ||||
| – | Employee racial diversity | Percentage of employees, All employee racial diversity | Asian/4% Caribbean/ | 11% Asian/4% | |
| 4% Mixed/ 2% Moth | Caribbean/6% Mixed | ||||
| Diversity-Pay1 | Gender pay ratio | Ratio of gender pay, mean/median | 39% Mean, 37% Median | 34% Mean, 31% Median | |
| Employee training and development | Average hours/employee | 46 | 51 | ||
| Emp-Training | Employee training, subscriptions, surveys, and online platforms |
Total £s invested | £179,096 | £208,322 | |
| Employee health & safety training | Average hours/ employee | 7 | 7 | ||
| Emp-Dev | Employee performance appraisals | Percentage of employees | 100% | 100% | |
| Total number of new hires2 | Total number | NewRiver direct |
8 | 30 | |
| Total number of leavers | Total number | employees3 | 5 | 2 | |
| Emp-Turnover | Rate of new hires2 | Percentage | 17% | 38% | |
| Rate of employee turnover | Percentage | 11% | 4% | ||
| – | Temporary staff | Percentage of employees who are contractors or temporary staff |
0% | 0% | |
| Injury rate | Per 100,000 hours worked | 0 | 0 | ||
| H&S-Emp | Lost day rate | Per 100,000 hours worked | 0 | 0 | |
| Absentee rate | Days per employee | 0 | 0.5 | ||
| Fatalities | Total number | 0 | 0 | ||
| – | Instances of non-compliance with labour standards | Total number | 0 | 0 | |
As we have fewer than 250 employees, we are not obliged by The Equality Act 2010 (Gender Pay Gap Information Regulations 2017) to disclose our gender pay information. We calculate gender pay gap based on the difference between the average annual salaries of men and women, excluding bonuses and other benefits.
Includes NewRiver's acquisition of Ellandi as "new hires".
Applies to all EPRA Codes excluding Diversity-Emp.
Admin cost ratio: Is the Group's share of net administrative expenses (including its share of JV administrative expenses) divided by the Group's share of property income (including its share of JV property income).
Associate: Is an entity in which the Group holds an interest and is significantly influenced by the Group.
Average debt maturity: Is measured in years when each tranche of gross debt is multiplied by the remaining period to its maturity and the result is divided by total gross debt in issue at the period end. Average debt maturity is expressed on a proportionally consolidated basis.
Balance sheet gearing: Is the balance sheet net debt divided by IFRS net assets.
BRAVO: Is BRAVO Strategies III LLC, with which NewRiver formed a capital partnership in May 2019 to acquire and manage a portfolio of retail assets in the UK.
Book value: Is the amount at which assets and liabilities are reported in the financial statements.
Cost of debt: Is the loan interest and derivative costs at the period end, divided by total debt in issue at the period end. Cost of debt is expressed on a proportionally consolidated basis.
CVA: Is a Company Voluntary Arrangement, a legally binding agreement that allows a company to settle debts by paying only a proportion of the amount that it owes to creditors (such as contracted rent) or to come to some other arrangement with its creditors over the payment of its debts.
Dividend cover: Is Underlying Funds From Operations per share divided by dividend per share declared in the period.
EBITDA: Earnings Before Interest, Tax, Depreciation and Amortisation
EPRA: Is the European Public Real Estate Association.
EPRA earnings: Is the IFRS profit after taxation excluding investment property revaluations, fair value adjustments on derivatives, gains/losses on disposals, deferred tax and adjustments relating to non-operating and exceptional items.
EPRA earnings per share: Is EPRA earnings divided by the weighted average basic number of shares in issue during the period.
EPRA Net Tangible Assets (EPRA NTA): Are the balance sheet net assets excluding the mark to market on effective cash flow hedges and related debt adjustments, deferred taxation on revaluations, goodwill, and diluting for the effect of those shares potentially issuable under employee share schemes.
EPRA NTA per share: Is EPRA NTA divided by the diluted number of shares at the period end.
EPRA LTV: Is the ratio of gross debt, net payables less cash and cash equivalents to the aggregate value of properties. LTV is expressed on a proportionally consolidated basis.
ERV growth: Is the change in ERV over a period on our investment portfolio expressed as a percentage of the ERV at the start of the period. ERV growth is calculated monthly and compounded for the period subject to measurement, as calculated by MSCI Real Estate.
Estimated Rental Value (ERV): Is the external valuers' opinion as to the open market rent which, on the date of valuation, could reasonably be expected to be obtained on a new letting or rent review of a property.
Footfall: Is the annualised number of visitors entering our shopping centre assets.
Gross Asset Value (GAV): Is the total value of all real estate investments owned by the Company.
Group: Is NewRiver REIT plc, the Company and its subsidiaries and its share of joint ventures (accounted for on an equity basis).
Head lease: Is a lease under which the Group holds an investment property.
IFRS: UK-adopted International Accounting Standards.
Income return: Is the income derived from a property as a percentage of the property value.
Interest Cover Ratio: Interest cover is tested at corporate level and is calculated by comparing actual net rental income received versus net cash interest payable on a 12 month look-back basis.
Joint venture: Is an entity in which the Group holds an interest on a long-term basis and is jointly controlled by the Group and one or more ventures under a contractual arrangement whereby decisions on financial and operating policies essential to the operation, performance and financial position of the venture require each joint venture partner's consent.
Leasing events: Are long-term and temporary new lettings, lease renewals and lease variations within investment and joint venture properties.
Like-for-like ERV growth: Is the change in ERV over a period on the standing investment properties expressed as a percentage of the ERV at the start of the period.
Like-for-like footfall: Is the movement in footfall against the same period in the prior period, on properties owned throughout both comparable periods, aggregated at 100% share.
Like-for-like net income: Is the change in net income on properties owned throughout the current and previous periods under review. This growth rate includes revenue recognition and lease accounting adjustments but excludes properties held for development in either period, properties with guaranteed rent reviews and asset management determinations.
Like-for-like valuation growth: Is the percentage change in investment properties (excluding right of use asset), reconciled as below:
| Investment properties | £m | |
|---|---|---|
| Investment properties brought forward (excluding right of use asset) (note 14) | 533.8 | |
| Investment properties held in associates (note 16) | ||
| Acquisitions (note 17) | 344.7 | |
| Capital expenditure | 10.0 | |
| Disposals (including joint ventures and associates) | (6.5) | |
| Total A |
892.0 | |
| Investment property as at 31 March 2025 B |
897.5 | |
| Like-for-like valuation growth B/A-1 |
0.6% |
Glossary continued
Long-term leasing deals: Are leasing deals with a fixed term certain of at least one year.
Loan to Value (LTV): Is the ratio of gross debt less cash, short-term deposits, liquid investments and unamortised fees to the aggregate value of properties and investments. LTV is expressed on a proportionally consolidated basis.
Mark to market: Is the difference between the book value of an asset or liability and its market value.
MSCI: MSCI Inc produces independent benchmarks of property returns and NewRiver portfolio returns.
Net debt: Net debt is the principal value of gross debt less unamortised fees, net of cash, shortterm deposits and liquid investments.
Net debt: EBITDA Ratio: Net debt: EBITDA is tested at corporate level and is calculated by comparing actual EBITDA received versus the average net debt on a 12 month look-back basis and is expressed on a proportionally consolidated basis.
Net Equivalent Yield (NEY): Is the net weighted average income return a property will produce based upon the timing of the income received. In accordance with usual practice, the equivalent yields (as determined by the external valuers) assume rent received annually in arrears and on values before deducting prospective purchaser's costs.
Net Initial Yield (NIY): Is the current annualised rent, net of costs, expressed as a percentage of capital value, after adding notional purchaser's costs.
Net rental income: Is the rental income receivable in the period after payment of property outgoings. Net rental income will differ from annualised net rents and passing rent due to the effects of income from rent reviews, property outgoings and accounting adjustments for fixed and minimum contracted rent reviews and lease incentives.
NewRiver share: Represents the Group's ownership on a proportionally consolidated basis.
Occupational Cost Ratio (OCR): The OCR is calculated by comparing the Occupational Costs associated with each unit, comprising the Rent payable, Business Rates, Service Charges and Insurance premiums, with the Turnover generated by the store on an annualised basis.
Passing rent: Is the gross rent payable under leases terms.
Portfolio valuation performance: Refers to the measurement of changes in the value of a portfolio of investments over a specified period, based on periodic revaluation of the underlying assets. It captures both realised and unrealised gains or losses, reflecting market movements, valuation adjustments and other factors affecting the fair value of the portfolio.
Pre-let: A lease signed with an occupier prior to the completion of a development.
Pre-sale: A sale exchanged with a purchaser prior to completion of a development.
Property Income Distribution (PID): As a REIT the Group is obliged to distribute 90% of the tax-exempt profits. These dividends, which are referred to as PIDs, are subject to withholding tax at the basic rate of income tax. Certain classes of shareholders may qualify to receive the dividend gross. See our website (www.nrr.co.uk) for details. The Group can also make other normal (non-PID) dividend payments which are taxed in the usual way.
Proportionally consolidated: The aggregation of the financial results of the Reported Group and the Group's share of net assets and net profits within its joint ventures and associates.
Real Estate Investment Trust (REIT): Is a listed property company which qualifies for and has elected into a tax regime, which exempts qualifying UK property rental income and gains on investment property disposals from corporation tax.
Rental value growth: Is the increase in the current rental value, as determined by the Company's valuers, over the 12-month period on a like-for-like basis.
Retail occupancy rate: Is the estimated rental value of let units expressed as a percentage of the total estimated rental value of the portfolio, excluding development units.
Risk-controlled development pipeline: Is the combination of all development projects that the Company is currently pursuing or assessing for feasibility. Our risk-controlled approach means that we will not commit to a new development unless we have pre-let or pre-sold at least 70% by area.
Tenant (or lease) incentives: Are any incentives offered to occupiers to enter into a lease. Typically the incentive will be an initial rent-free period, or a cash contribution to fit-out or similar costs. Under accounting rules, the value of lease incentives given to tenants is amortised through the Income Statement on a straight-line basis to the lease expiry.
Total Accounting Return (TAR): Is the increase or decrease in EPRA NTA per share plus dividends paid in the period, expressed as a percentage of EPRA NTA per share at the beginning of the period.
Total Property Return (TPR): Is calculated as the change in capital value, less any capital expenditure incurred, plus net income, expressed as a percentage of capital employed over the period, as calculated by MSCI Real Estate (formerly IPD). Total property returns are calculated monthly and indexed to provide a return over the relevant period.
Topped-Up Net Initial Yield: Net initial yield adjusted to include notional rent in respect of let properties which are subject to a rent free period at the valuation date.
Underlying Funds From Operations (UFFO): is a measure of the Company's operational profits, which includes other income and excludes one off or non-cash adjustments, such as portfolio valuation movements, profits or losses on the disposal of investment properties, fair value movements on derivatives, Snozone depreciation, amortisation and lease liability interest on PPE, exceptional costs and share-based payment expense.
Weighted average lease expiry (WALE): Is the average lease term remaining to first tenant break, or expiry, across the portfolio weighted by rental income. This is also disclosed assuming all tenant break clauses are exercised at the earliest date, as stated. Excludes short-term licences and residential leases.
Yield on cost: Passing rents expressed as a percentage of the total development cost of a property.
Yield Shift: Is a movement (usually expressed in basis points) in the equivalent yield of a property asset.
Lynn Fordham (Non-Executive Chair)
Allan Lockhart (Chief Executive Officer)
Will Hobman (Chief Financial Officer)
Alastair Miller (Non-Executive Director)
Dr Karen Miller (Non-Executive Director)
Charlie Parker (Non-Executive Director)
Colin Rutherford (Non-Executive Director)
Kerin Williams (Company Secretary)
89 Whitfield Street London W1T 4DE
10221027
Panmure Liberum Limited Ropemaker Place, Level 12 25 Ropemaker Street London EC2Y 9LY
Jefferies International Limited 100 Bishopsgate London EC2N 4JL
Shore Capital Limited Cassini House 57 St James's Street London SW1A 1LD

This report is printed on paper certified in accordance with the FSC® (Forest Stewardship Council®) and is recyclable and acid-free.
Pureprint Ltd is FSC certified and ISO 14001 certified showing that it is committed to all round excellence and improving environmental performance is an important part of this strategy.
Pureprint Ltd aims to reduce at source the effect its operations have on the environment and is committed to continual improvement, prevention of pollution and compliance with any legislation or industry standards.
Pureprint Ltd is a Carbon/Neutral® Printing Company.
Designed and produced by Black Sun Global www.blacksun-global.com
NewRiver REIT plc 89 Whitfield Street London W1T 4DE Tel: +44(0) 20 3328 5800

NewRiver REIT plc Annual Report and Accounts 2025
Building tools?
Free accounts include 100 API calls/year for testing.
Have a question? We'll get back to you promptly.