Annual Report • Mar 21, 2025
Annual Report
Open in ViewerOpens in native device viewer
Annual Report 2024
RWE's history dates back to 1898. Our journey has been characterised by rapid social and technological change. But one part of our story has always remained the same: our product, electricity. The only difference now is how we generate that power. We produced our very first megawatt hour from hard coal. Later, lignite and nuclear were our main energy sources. Today, they have been replaced with wind, sun, water and natural gas. Tomorrow, we will make a full transition to zero-carbon energy sources. Because our objective is to be carbon neutral. And we want to accomplish this by 2040.
Green energy is the lifeblood of a sustainable economy. And demand for it is not only rising in the energy sector, but also in industry, transport and buildings. We want to play our part in ensuring that electricity produced by techniques that are gentle on the climate becomes the main pillar of energy supply - on the back of investments that create both social and economic value. We are making good progress on this journey. In 2024, we made net investments of $€ 10$ billion, more than at any other time in the last 15 years.
However, the environment is challenging and requires a great deal of flexibility. Our current plan is to make net investments of about $€ 35$ billion in the period from 2025 to 2030 in new wind and solar farms, battery storage, flexible backup power stations and electrolysers for green hydrogen production. These investments will have to meet our strict return requirements. After all, we want our growth to pay off for our shareholders. Our aim is to raise adjusted earnings per share to about $€ 4$ by 2030 .
Our 20,000+ strong workforce is wholeheartedly dedicated to harnessing the benefits of a secure, affordable and increasingly climatefriendly electricity supply for businesses and society as a whole. This commitment is expressed in our purpose: Our energy for a sustainable life. It is what sets RWE apart. And we will remain true to this conviction as we continue our journey down this road. Just as we have done with our product, electricity.
| RWE Group - key figures ${ }^{1}$ | 2024 | 2023 | $+/-$ | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power generation | GWh | 117,801 | 129,701 | $-11,900$ | |
| External revenue (excl. notural gas tox/electricity tax) | € million | 24,224 | 28,521 | $-4,297$ | |
| Adjusted EBITDA | € million | 5,680 | 7,749 | $-2,069$ | |
| Adjusted EBIT | € million | 3,561 | 5,802 | $-2,241$ | |
| Income before tax | € million | 6,343 | 3,999 | 2,344 | |
| Net income/income attributable to RWE AG shareholders | € million | 5,135 | 1,515 | 3,620 | |
| Adjusted net income | € million | 2,322 | 4,098 | $-1,776$ | |
| Cash flows from operating activities | € million | 6,620 | 4,223 | 2,397 | |
| Capital expenditure | € million | 11,240 | 9,979 | 1,261 | |
| Property, plant and equipment and intangible assets | € million | 9,377 | 5,146 | 4,231 | |
| Acquisitions and financial assets | € million | 1,863 | 4,833 | $-2,970$ | |
| Proportion of taxonomy-aligned investments ${ }^{2}$ | \% | 94 | 89 | 5 | |
| Free cash flow | € million | $-4,106$ | $-4,594$ | 488 | |
| Number of shares outstanding (average) | thousands | 743,554 | 743,841 | $-287$ | |
| Earnings per share | € | 6.91 | 2.04 | 4.87 | |
| Adjusted net income per share | € | 3.12 | 5.51 | $-2.39$ | |
| Dividend per share ${ }^{3}$ | € | 1.10 | 1.00 | 0.10 | |
| 31 Dec 2024 | 31 Dec 2023 | ||||
| Net debt | € million | $-11,177$ | $-6,587$ | $-4,590$ | |
| Workforce ${ }^{4}$ | 20,985 | 20,135 | 850 |
1 Some prior-year figures restated; see commentary on page 40.
2 Taxonomy-alignment is when an activity meets the applicable requirements under the EU Taxonomy Regulation.
3 Dividend proposal for fiscal 2024, subject to the passing of a resolution by the 30 April 2025 Annual General Meeting.
4 Converted to full-time equivalents.
| 1 | To our investors | 05 | 3 | Consolidated financial statements | 187 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1.1 | Letter from the CEO | 06 | 3.1 | Income statement | 188 |
| 1.2 | Executive Board of RWE | 08 | 3.2 | Statement of comprehensive income | 189 |
| 1.3 | Supervisory Board report | 09 | 3.3 | Balance sheet | 190 |
| 1.4 | RWE on the capital market | 16 | 3.4 | Cash flow statement | 192 |
| 3.5 | Statement of changes in equity | 194 | |||
| 2 | Combined management report | 20 | 3.6 | Notes | 196 |
| 2.1 | Business model and strategy | 21 | 3.7 | List of shareholdings | |
| 2.2 | Innovation | 28 | (part of the Notes) | 287 | |
| 2.3 | Business environment | 31 | 3.8 | Boards (part of the Notes) | 346 |
| 2.4 | Major events | 36 | |||
| 2.5 | Business performance | 40 | 4 | Notes from the auditor | 352 |
| 2.6 | Financial position and net worth | 52 | 4.1 | Independent auditor's report | 353 |
| 2.7 | Notes to the financial statements of RWE AG (holding company) | 4.2 | Information on the auditor | 364 | |
| 57 | 4.3 | Assurance report in relation to the Group Sustainability Statement | |||
| 2.8 | Outlook | 59 | 365 | ||
| 2.9 | Development of risks and opportunities | 61 | |||
| 2.10 | Disclosure relating to German takeover law | 71 | 5 | Responsibility statement | 370 |
| 2.11 | Group Sustainability Statement | 74 | |||
| 6 | Further information | 372 | |||
| 6.1 | Five-year overview | 373 | |||
| 6.2 | Imprint | 374 | |||
| 6.3 | Financial calendar | 375 |
In accordance with Section 162 of the German Stock Corporation Act, we published the Remuneration Report for fiscal 2024 as a separate report. It has also been included in the invitation to the virtual Annual General Meeting, scheduled for 30 April 2025.
The publications are available at www.rwe.com/remuneration and www.rwe.com/agm.
1.1 Letter from the CEO ..... 06
1.2 Executive Board of RWE AG ..... 08
1.3 Supervisory Board report ..... 09
1.4 RWE on the capital market ..... 16

Dr. Markus Krebber,
Chief Executive Officer of RWE AG
Just over three years ago, we set our course with our Growing Green strategy. Since then, RWE has expanded its solar and wind portfolio by $90 \%$, advancing to become one of the world's leading providers of electricity from renewables. In 2024, renewable energy accounted for over $40 \%$ of our electricity generation - more than any other source of
energy. We also made good progress in terms of decarbonisation, the second pillar of our strategy: our carbon dioxide emissions from power production dropped by $13 \%$ last year. This brings the total reduction over the last three years to $35 \%$. The basis for this is the responsible phaseout of coal-fired generation. Whereas 18 RWE lignite units were still in operation at the end of 2021, this figure has fallen to just seven today. As planned, six units were decommissioned over the last year alone.
We can also look back on a positive result in economic terms. As in the preceding years, we exceeded our own earnings forecast. We posted adjusted EBITDA of $€ 5.7$ billion. This is half a billion euros more than we anticipated at the beginning of the year. A strong trading performance and significant income from the commercial optimisation of our power plant dispatch were the drivers. Year on year, we recorded a positive development in the renewables business, as a large number of new wind and solar farms as well as battery storage systems were commissioned in 2024, contributing their earnings to RWE's bottom line for the first time.
This demonstrates RWE's robust position. We benefit from a growing renewable energy business and profitable flexible power stations combined with decades of expertise in optimally marketing our electricity generation. In the financial year that just came to a close, #TeamRWE once again stepped up to the plate to drive forward our business with their know-how and tireless dedication. I would like to take this opportunity to express my heartfelt thanks to our over 20,000 employees worldwide for this.
We continue to chart this course with resolve. Some 150 projects in eleven countries are under construction. These include the Sofia wind farm on Dogger Bank off the UK coast, where we expect to commission the first turbines this summer. In addition, we are building onshore wind farms, solar farms, battery storage systems and electrolysers. About three quarters of the capacity under construction is scheduled to go online by the end of 2026.
The outlook generally remains positive: electrification and artificial intelligence are driving demand for electricity, especially in the USA. Thanks to our portfolio of generation assets and diversified development pipeline of new build projects, we are perfectly positioned to meet this rising demand.
However, we are also facing challenges in the investing environment, which are becoming increasingly demanding: persistent high inflation, rising interest rates, supply chain bottlenecks, geopolitical tension, and potential tariffs. What's more, these are compounded by new regulatory uncertainty around the future direction of energy policy, particularly in the USA. These were among the factors responsible for the hard time renewable energy companies recently experienced on the stock markets. Unfortunately, the ramifications were also felt by you, our shareholders. Despite RWE's positive earnings, our share lost a considerable amount of its value in 2024.
Although the long-term market outlook remains positive and there is no doubt that huge investments have to be made in electricity generation, we must react to the heightened risks to which investment decisions are exposed. The uncertain environment calls for even stricter risk management. With this in mind, we raised our return requirements for new investments. We believe that the outcome from this will be a deceleration of growth. We want to invest a total of about $€ 35$ billion in the period from 2025 to 2030. This is roughly $€ 10$ billion less than we had originally planned.
In November 2024, in reaction to the most recent political developments in the USA and delays in the European hydrogen business, we announced that we would postpone some of our planned investments. We will use the funds this has freed up to buy back $€ 1.5$ billion in shares by May 2026. Share buybacks will remain a fixture of our capital allocation decisions in the future.
Despite the reduced investment programme, we maintain our long-term earnings goals. We anticipate that adjusted net income will rise to about $€ 4$ per share by 2030 . We still have our sights set on a figure of around $€ 3$ per share for 2027. And you, our shareholders, will benefit from the positive earnings trend in the form of rising dividends: we are aiming for an annual increase of $5 \%$ to $10 \%$ through to 2030 . We will propose to the Annual General Meeting a dividend of $€ 1.10$ per share for fiscal 2024. This represents an increase of 10 euro cents compared to the previous year. We plan to implement a further 10 cent increase for the 2025 financial year, which would lift the dividend to $€ 1.20$ per share.
My dear shareholders, we have a resilient setup, which will enable us to benefit from the growing business in our core markets. This holds true even though the environment for future investments has become more challenging. We are reacting to this with even more stringent return on investment requirements and risk management standards. We always take a disciplined approach when managing our company's capital. In the current climate, this means reducing the pace of investment. Our financial targets remain unchanged - as does our promise to enable you to continue sharing in the company's success through increasing dividends.
We thank you for your trust in these challenging times and are confident that the positive long-term market environment will be reflected by our earnings growth and, in turn, the price of the RWE share.
With best wishes,

Dr. Markus Krebber has been a member of the RWE AG Executive Board since 2016, becoming Chief Executive Officer in May 2021. Upon joining the RWE Group in 2012, he initially sat on the Board of Directors of RWE Supply \& Trading GmbH. From 2015 to 2017, he then steered this company as CEO. Prior to moving to RWE, Markus Krebber held various management positions at Commerzbank. Between 2000 and 2005 he was a business consultant at McKinsey \& Company. Markus Krebber was born in 1973 in Kleve. He initially trained as a banker before studying economics. He completed his doctorate at the Humboldt University of Berlin in 2007.
Dr. Michael Müller has been a member of the RWE AG Executive Board since November 2020 and was named Chief Financial Officer in May 2021. He has worked for the Group since 2005 and has held various management positions including Head of Group Controlling at RWE Power AG, RWE Generation SE and RWE AG. In 2016, Michael Müller became a member of the Management Board and CFO of RWE Supply \& Trading GmbH. He worked in business consultancy for McKinsey \& Company for five years before joining the RWE Group. Michael Müller was born in 1971 in Cologne. He first studied business and mechanical engineering before graduating with a doctorate in mechanical engineering.
Katja van Doren has been a member of the RWE Executive Board since August 2023. Prior to being appointed as Chief Human Resources Officer and Labour Director, she held the position of Chief Financial Officer of RWE Generation SE from 2018. Katja van Doren started working for RWE in 1999 and has held management roles in the areas of finance, accounting and tax. In 2014, she took on the role of Group Division Manager Accounting \& Tax, working on the stock market flotation of RWE's former subsidiary innogy SE. Katja van Doren was born in Hilden in 1966. After graduating with a degree in business administration, she started her career in 1991 at KPMG, where she worked as an auditor and tax consultant.

Dr. Michael Müller, Dr. Markus Krebber and Katja van Doren

Dr. Werner Brandt,
Chairman of the Supervisory Board of RWE AG
Plenty of sun, but not without its share of shade - that would be one way to sum up fiscal 2024 from RWE's perspective. The fact that the positive outweighed the negative was in part attributable to the company's strong business performance. All key operational earnings indicators exceeded the expectations outlined in early 2024. The strides taken in expanding renewables are also no small achievement: wind and solar generation capacity has been upped by $10 \%$ and net investment hit a 15 -year high, coming in at around $€ 10$ billion. RWE has shifted into high gear to drive our Growing Green strategy forward.
However, we now recognise that this pace is not sustainable. Not least given the increasingly precarious nature of the investment environment for renewables, particularly in the USA - one of the more challenging developments of the past year. RWE's share performance was far from satisfactory. Electricity producers pursuing green growth felt the squeeze on the stock market. RWE AG's Executive and Supervisory Boards discussed these developments at length and scrutinised the Group's strategy. We are in agreement with the Executive Board that RWE remains on the right trajectory, but that the volatile environment necessitates a more measured pace of growth and a more flexible allocation of capital. This includes redirecting funds to the capital market if investments do not offer returns that reflect the risk involved. In late 2024, the Executive Board made use of this option, launching the share buyback programme. The Supervisory Board supported its decision, which was well received by the stock markets.
Allow me to now turn to the Supervisory Board activity in the past year in more detail. As you have come to expect from us, we conscientiously fulfilled our duties. The main function of the Supervisory Board is to advise the Executive Board on running the company and monitor its actions, which we have done with great care. We were involved in all fundamental decision-making. Management informed us verbally and in writing of all material developments pertaining to the Group's business performance, financial position, net worth and strategy, as well as the associated risks and how we manage them. These updates were regular, comprehensive and timely. We passed all the necessary resolutions as required by German law and the Articles of Incorporation. This was done based on detailed reports and draft resolutions provided by the Executive Board. Some decisions were taken by circular. The Executive Board kept us abreast of projects and processes of particular importance or urgency e.g. during our extraordinary meeting and in between sessions. I was constantly in touch with the Chief Executive Officer, allowing us to quickly resolve urgent matters without delay. The exchange maintained by the Chair of the Audit Committee, Monika Kircher, with the Chief Financial Officer was just as regular.
In my role as Chairman of the Supervisory Board, I discussed matters concerning the work of the Supervisory Board and its committees with investors and proxy advisors ahead of the Annual General Meeting. A major topic was the election of new Supervisory Board members at the Annual General Meeting on 3 May 2024. On this day, the terms of Ute Gerbaulet, Hans-Peter Keitel, Erhard Schipporeit and Ullrich Sierau expired. Of the aforementioned individuals, only Ute Gerbaulet was eligible for re-election. Hans-Peter Keitel and Erhard Schipporeit had exceeded the standard retirement age for Supervisory Board members of 72. Ullrich Sierau's tenure had reached twelve years, and we generally believe it is good governance not to extend it. Three positions on the Board therefore needed filling. I shared the criteria we applied when selecting successor candidates with the capital market representatives. I will speak more about the new appointments to the Board at the end of this report. Another major topic during my meetings with investors was the remuneration system of the Executive Board. We also discussed the lignite exit in the Rhenish region and the power plant strategy of the German government.
Main points of debate of the Supervisory Board meetings. Last year, the Supervisory Board convened for seven meetings, including one extraordinary session. It was standard practice to at times discuss matters without the Executive Board, particularly issues that directly concerned it. The shareholder and employee representatives met separately before the Supervisory Board sessions, in order to consult on matters in a smaller circle and establish joint positions where necessary. I will now elaborate on the main points of each meeting:
In addition, I briefed the Board on my conversations with investors and proxy advisors. The reasons for the disappointing performance of the RWE share and possible measures to strengthen the share price were further items on the agenda. We also concerned ourselves with the regular assessment of the extent to which the Executive Board members had met their targets in fiscal 2023, which affected their remuneration.
Committee. Following the advice of the Audit Committee, we decided to enlist the services of Deloitte for the audit of the Remuneration Report for fiscal 2024.
Work of the Supervisory Board committees. The Supervisory Board has six committees, the members of which are listed on page $\$ 46$ of this Annual Report. The committees are charged with preparing topics for discussion by the Supervisory Board in order to establish a basis for the corporate body to pass resolutions. In certain cases, they themselves exercise decision-making powers if such have been conferred on them by the Supervisory Board.
You can find more information on the work and composition of the committees in the Corporate Governance Declaration and the Rules of Procedure for the Supervisory Board. These documents are available at www.rwe.com/corporate-governance-declaration and www.rwe.com/en/investor-relations/corporate-governance/articles-of-association. The Supervisory Board is informed of the work of the committees by their chairs at every ordinary meeting. In the year under review, a total of eleven committee meetings were held, on which I would like to report in more detail.
Furthermore, the Audit Committee submitted a recommendation to the Supervisory Board regarding the selection of the independent auditors for fiscal 2024, prepared the grant of the audit award to the independent auditors including the fee agreement and set the priorities of the audit. It assessed the independence of the auditor and the quality of the audit. The Committee also concerned itself with the appointment of an auditor for the Remuneration Report and the Group Sustainability Statement for fiscal 2024. At its meetings, the Committee dealt with a number of other topics, such as RWE's risk exposure, liquidity management, the protection of IT systems against cyber attacks, the planning for the audits by the Internal Audit department, the findings from the audits, and legal and tax issues.
The Audit Committee also verified the efficacy of the accounting-related internal control system, the compliance management system, the risk management system and the internal audit system. Related party transactions were also on the agenda. They were analysed to assess whether they were carried out in the ordinary course of business and subject to normal market conditions, as required by the law for implementing the second German Shareholders' Rights Directive.
Attendance. The table on the following page shows the attendance at each Supervisory Board and committee meeting. As the Mediation Committee did not convene in 2024, it has not been listed in the summary. The two figures are to be interpreted as follows: if the table states ' $6 / 7$ ', then the individual in question attended six out of the seven sessions that were convened during their term in the respective corporate body. The numbers show that obsences were the absolute exception. The participation rate was $99 \%$.
Meeting formats. The table on page 14 shows the individual formats of each Supervisory Board and committee meeting. The six ordinary sessions of the Supervisory Board were attended in person, although at times some participants dialled into the session via a video feed. The extraordinary meeting, on the other hand, was conducted entirely online.
| Attendance at meetings in fiscal 2024 by Supervisory Board member | Supervisory Board |
Executive Committee | Audit Committee | Personnel Affairs Committee | Nomination Committee | Strategy and Sustainability Committee | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dr. Werner Brandt, Chairman | 7/7 | $1 / 1$ | $4 / 4^{1}$ | $4 / 4$ | $1 / 1$ | $1 / 1$ | |
| Ralf Sikorski, Deputy Chairman | 7/7 | $1 / 1$ | $4 / 4$ | $1 / 1$ | |||
| Dr. Frank Appel | $5 / 5$ | $1 / 1$ | $3 / 3^{1}$ | $3 / 3$ | $1 / 1$ | $1 / 1$ | |
| Michael Bochinsky | 7/7 | $4 / 4$ | $1 / 1$ | ||||
| Sandro Bossemeyer | 7/7 | $4 / 4$ | |||||
| Dr. Hans Friedrich Bürting | 7/7 | $3 / 3$ | $1 / 1$ | $1 / 1$ | |||
| Matthias Dürbaum | 7/7 | $4 / 4$ | |||||
| Ute Gerbaulet | 7/7 | $1 / 1$ | |||||
| Prof. Dr.-Ing. Dr.-Ing. h.c. Hans-Peter Keitel | 2/2 | $1 / 1$ | |||||
| Mag. Dr. h.c. Monika Kircher | 7/7 | $4 / 4$ | |||||
| Thomas Kufen | 7/7 | ||||||
| Reiner van Limbeck | 7/7 | $1 / 1$ | |||||
| Harald Louis | 7/7 | $4 / 4$ | $1 / 1$ | ||||
| Dagmar Paasch | 7/7 | $4 / 4$ | $1 / 1$ | ||||
| Prof. Jörg Rocholl | $5 / 5$ | ||||||
| Dr. Erhard Schipporeit | 2/2 | $1 / 1$ | |||||
| Dirk Schumacher | 7/7 | $1 / 1$ | |||||
| Ulrich Sierou | 2/2 | $1 / 1$ | |||||
| Hauke Stars | 7/7 | $4 / 4$ | $1 / 1$ | ||||
| Helle Valentin | 7/7 | $1 / 1$ | |||||
| Dr. Andreas Wagner | 7/7 | ||||||
| Marion Weckes | 6/7 | ||||||
| Thomas Westphal | $5 / 5$ | $2 / 3$ |
1 Werner Brandt and Frank Appel attended the meetings of the Audit Committee as guests.
| Meeting formats in fiscal 2024 | Supervisory Board |
Executive Committee |
Audit Committee |
Personnel Affairs Committee |
Noninati Committee |
Strategy and Sustainability Committee |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| On-site meeting | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | |||
| On-site meeting with video participation (hybrid) | 3 | 4 | |||||
| Virtual meeting | 1 | 3 | 1 |
Conflicts of interest. In accordance with the law and the German Corporate Governance Code, members of the Supervisory Board are required to disclose any conflicts of interest without delay. In the past fiscal year, no such conflicts were reported.
RWE AG and Group financial statements for 2024. The 2024 financial statements of RWE AG, the financial statements of the Group, as well as the combined management report for RWE AG and the Group have been audited and issued on unqualified auditor's opinion by Deloitte in consideration of the accounts. Martin Bornhofen and Benedikt Brüggemann were responsible for the audit. In addition, Deloitte subjected the Group Sustainability Statement to a limited assurance audit. Reasonable assurance checks were carried out on individual indicators, such as information pertaining to EU taxonomy. Deloitte found that the Executive Board had established an appropriate early risk detection system. The company had been selected as the independent auditor by the 2024 Annual General Meeting. Thereafter, the Supervisory Board had commissioned them to audit the aforementioned financial statements and reports.
The Executive Board commented on the documents supporting the RWE AG and Group financial statements, the Annual Report and the audit reports at the Supervisory Board's balance-sheet meeting on 18 March 2025. The documents were made available to the members of the Supervisory Board in good time. During the session, the independent auditors reported on the material findings of the audit and were available to furnish supplementary information. The Audit Committee had concerned itself in depth with the financial statements of RWE AG, the financial statements of the Group and the audit reports with the auditors present the day before. The Committee recommended that the Supervisory Board approve the financial statements and endorse the appropriation of distributable profit proposed by the Executive Board.
The financial statements of RWE AG, the Group financial statements, the combined management report, the Executive Board's proposal regarding the appropriation of distributable profit, and the Group Sustainability Statement were reviewed by the Supervisory Board. We did not raise any objections. As recommended by the Audit Committee, the Supervisory Board endorsed the findings of the audits of the financial statements of RWE AG and the consolidated financial statements and approved both financial statements. The financial statements for fiscal 2024 are therefore adopted. The Supervisory Board concurs with the Executive Board's proposal regarding the appropriation of profits, which envisages paying a dividend of $€ 1.10$ per share.
Training and onboarding for Supervisory Board members. One of our duties as members of the Supervisory Board is to take responsibility for the training and professional development necessary for our work. We do so, and are supported by RWE AG in these efforts, e. g. by organising information forums. Last year, two such forums took place, one in June and one in September. At the first session, we were briefed on the business activities of RWE Renewables Europe \& Australia and the second focused on those of US subsidiary RWE Clean Energy. These meetings gave us comprehensive insights into the value chains of both companies - starting with project conception and development through to construction, operation and maintenance of the generation assets. Furthermore, we were advised of the financial indicators and growth strategies of both companies, as well as the challenges the industry is currently facing. As previously mentioned, the event in June also gave us the opportunity to take a tour of renewable energy assets in the Rhenish region. RWE bears the cost of this training.
One of the good traditions at RWE is that new Supervisory Board members receive comprehensive support from the company during their orientation phase. As part of an established onboarding process, they learn about RWE's business model, Group structures and special topics. The Board Office, part of the Legal department, provides advisory and organisational support in this regard.
Self-assessment of the Supervisory Board. Continually reviewing and improving the quality of our work is one of the Supervisory Board's duties. As part of these ongoing efforts, we conduct regular self-assessments, the most recent of which took place in 2024. We were assisted by an external consultant who interviewed my colleagues and me about our activities both verbally and in writing. The Executive Board and the Board Office were also asked to provide feedback. The results showed that the Supervisory Board's work is considered to be responsible, purposeful and effective. The Board's members were very satisfied by the way in which the Executive Board keeps them informed and involved in decision-making. In some areas of our work, however, we saw room for improvement. For example, we aim to gain clearer insights into RWE's talent pool in order to facilitate future succession planning. The assessment demonstrated just how important it is to involve the Supervisory Board in the development of the Group's strategy and for the Board to have international experience.
Changes in personnel on the Executive and Supervisory Boards. In the past year, the Executive Board saw no changes in personnel, unlike the Supervisory Board. As previously mentioned, the terms of Ute Gerbaulet, Hans-Peter Keitel, Erhard Schipporeit and Ullrich Sierau expired on conclusion of the Annual General Meeting on 3 May 2024. In addition to Ute Gerbaulet, the only Board member to stand for re-election, the following individuals were newly elected to the Supervisory Board for three years as per our recommendations: Frank Appel, Chairman of the Supervisory Board of Deutsche Telekom AG, Jörg Rocholl, President of the European School of Management and Technology (ESMT Berlin) and Thomas Westphal, Mayor of the city of Dortmund, Germany. I would like to thank their predecessors, who were deeply committed to the Board's work for many years and offered me steadfast and professional support.
RWE - thanks to our employees. To the Executive Board and all employees, I extend my heartfelt thanks on behalf of my colleagues on the Supervisory Board. To navigate the many challenges that lie ahead, we need motivated, dependable people pulling in the same direction. RWE's employees demonstrated these qualities again in 2024.
As previously mentioned, I will be stepping down at the end of April 2025 after twelve years on the Supervisory Board of RWE AG. I do so with gratitude for the incredible support I have received from my colleagues on the Supervisory Board, the Executive Board and the entire RWE team. Parting is never easy, but I am convinced that RWE is in the best hands to navigate the many challenges that naturally come with ambitious plans.
Dr. Werner Brandt
Chairman of the Supervisory Board
Essen, 18 March 2025
Stock markets experienced a strong year in 2024. The DAX gained 19\%, buoyed by interest rate cuts and a dynamic US stock market. By contrast, RWE's share put in a disappointing performance. Despite this, its total return of $-28 \%$ slightly exceeded that of the MSCI Global Alternative Energy Index, which reflects the development in the value of renewable energy companies. A collapse in wholesale electricity prices triggered substantial markdowns right at the beginning of the year. Uncertainties surrounding the future regulatory framework for green investments also weighed on our share price. Investors increased their focus on these uncertainties especially due to the US presidential election.
Total return of the RWE share, the DAX, STOXX Europe 600 Utilities and MSCI Global Alternative Energy indices \% (average weekly figures)

Positive momentum on the stock markets: DAX up 19\%. Despite the tense geopolitical situation and weak economic data in Europe, markets stayed upbeat in 2024. The DAX climbed from one all-time high to the next, exceeding 20,000 points for the first time ever in early December. Germany's leading index closed the year at 19,909 points, with a total return of $19 \%$. The strong performance was largely driven by central banks easing monetary policies in response to falling inflation. The European Central Bank and the US Federal Reserve cut their main interest rates multiple times. The US stock market's positive development, fuelled by the favourable economic situation in North America and a surge in investor enthusiasm for artificial intelligence, proved to be another driver for the DAX.
RWE share records weak performance. RWE shareholders had a disappointing 2024. Our share closed the year at $€ 28.83$ - notably below its 2023 closing price ( $€ 41.18$ ). Including the dividend of $€ 1.00$ paid in May, the share recorded a total return of $-28 \%$. The weak performance was in part due to the considerable drop in wholesale electricity prices at the beginning of 2024. Although electricity quotations recovered thereafter, the RWE share was unable to make up for the decline. In addition, the 2024 bumper election year ushered in new regulatory uncertainties regarding renewable energy projects, above all in the USA. Moreover, some competitors' wind projects came under pressure from cost increases. The aforementioned factors were also mirrored by the development of the MSCI Global Alternative Energy Index, which reflects the performance of renewable energy company stocks and which lost a third of its value in 2024.
| RWE shore indicators ${ }^{1}$ | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings per shore | € | 6.91 | 2.04 | 3.93 | 1.07 | 1.65 | |
| Adjusted net income per shore | € | 3.12 | 5.51 | 4.71 | 2.30 | 1.97 | |
| Cash flows from operating activities per shore | € | 9.08 | 5.68 | 3.48 | 10.76 | 6.47 | |
| Dividend per shore | € | $1.10^{2}$ | 1.00 | 0.90 | 0.90 | 0.85 | |
| Shore price | |||||||
| End of fiscal year | € | 28.83 | 41.18 | 41.59 | 35.72 | 34.57 | |
| Highest closing price | € | 41.17 | 42.75 | 43.72 | 38.65 | 35.02 | |
| Lowest closing price | € | 28.25 | 32.73 | 34.34 | 28.64 | 21.00 | |
| Shore dividend yield ${ }^{3}$ | \% | 3.8 | 2.4 | 2.2 | 2.5 | 2.5 | |
| Number of shares outstanding (annual average) | thousands | 743,5544 | 743,841 | 691,247 | 676,220 | 637,286 | |
| Market capitalisation at the end of the year | € billion | 21.3 | 30.6 | 28.1 | 24.2 | 23.4 |
1 The comparability of some of the figures for various fiscal years is limited due to changes in reporting.
2 Dividend proposal for RWE AG's 2024 fiscal year, subject to the passing of a resolution by the 30 April 2025 Annual General Meeting.
3 Ratio of the dividend per share to the shore price at the end of the respective fiscal year.
4 The RWE shares repurchased under the current shore buyback programme have been prorated up to the date on which they were legally transferred to RWE.
Dividend proposal for past fiscal year: $€ 1.10$ per share. In view of the Group's persistently strong earnings, the Executive Board and the Supervisory Board of RWE AG will propose a dividend of $€ 1.10$ per share for fiscal 2024 to the Annual General Meeting on 30 April 2025. Thereafter, we will look to raise the dividend by $5 \%$ to $10 \%$ annually. The dividend envisaged for fiscal 2025 is $€ 1.20$, representing a rise of $9 \%$.
€1.5 billion share buyback programme launched. At the end of November 2024, RWE initiated a share buyback programme with a volume of up to $€ 1.5$ billion. The repurchased shares will be cancelled. We expect to complete the buyback process within 18 months. By 31 December 2024, we had already purchased 4,448,369 shares as part of the programme. You can find more information on the share buyback on page 39.

1 As at the end of 2024, percentages are based on RWE data and notifications from shareholders in accordance with the German Securities Trading Act.
Broad international shareholder base. Based on our latest shareholder structure analysis, an estimated $88 \%$ of the RWE shares outstanding were held by institutional investors at the end of 2024, with $12 \%$ being owned by individuals (including employee shareholders). Institutional investors from North America held $24 \%$ of our capital stock. This investor group accounted for $21 \%$ in Germany, a combined $15 \%$ in the United Kingdom and Ireland, $12 \%$ in Continental Europe excluding Germany, and another $12 \%$ in the Middle East. Our single-largest shareholder was Qatar Holding, with a stake of $9.1 \%$, followed by US asset management company BlackRock with $4.9 \%$.
Profit participation through employee shares. About $1 \%$ of our stock is owned by our current and former staff members. In Germany and the UK, we offer our employees the opportunity to take shares in RWE on preferential terms. Last year, 8,626 people, representing $46 \%$ of all qualifying personnel, made use of these offers and bought a total of 637,243 shares. The preferential terms and the administration of the employee share schemes led to an expense of $€ 4.6$ million.
| Ticker symbols and identification numbers of the RWE share | |
|---|---|
| Reuters: Xetra | RWEG:DE |
| Bloomberg: Xetra | RWE GY |
| German Securities Identification Number | 703712 |
| International Securities Identification Number (ISIN) | DE0007037129 |
| ADR CUSIP Number | 74975 E 303 |
RWE represented on numerous stock markets. RWE shares are traded on the Frankfurt Stock Exchange and other German exchanges, as well as via electronic platforms such as Xetra. They are also available on stock markets in the rest of Europe. In the USA, RWE is represented via a Level 1 ADR programme, under which American Depositary Receipts (ADRs) are traded in place of our shares. ADRs are share certificates issued by US depositary banks, representing a certain number of a foreign company's deposited shares. Under RWE's programme, one ADR represents one share.
RWE bond volume rises to $€ 9.1$ billion. At the end of 2024, RWE bonds with a nominal value of around $€ 9.1$ billion were outstanding. This is $€ 2.4$ billion more than at the end of 2023. To finance our growth investments, we issued three new bonds last year. First, we placed a $€ 500$ million green bond on the market. The paper issued in January had a tenor of 8 years and a coupon of $3.625 \%$. Our first two green US dollar bonds followed in April. The issuances had a volume of US $\$ 1$ billion each, tenors of 10 years and 30 years, and coupons of $5.875 \%$ and $6.250 \%$, respectively. We have included a summary of our bonds outstanding on page 53.
Solid investment grade credit rating. The level of our borrowing costs largely hinges on how rating agencies assess our creditworthiness. Moody's and Fitch make such evaluations at our request. Both agencies have assigned us an investment grade credit rating. Moody's gives our long-term creditworthiness a rating of 'Baa2'. According to the rating scale applied at Fitch, we are graded a notch higher at 'BBB+'. The outlook on our rating is 'stable' for both agencies. Moody's and Fitch confirmed their credit ratings in October and November 2024, respectively. In doing so, they recognise RWE's sizeable, diversified electricity generation portfolio, our progress in advancing renewables, the exit from coal-fired power generation, our balanced financing strategy and our solid operating earnings.
| Credit rating of RWE AG (as of February 2025) | Moody's | Fitch |
|---|---|---|
| Long-term debt | ||
| Senior debt | Baa2 | BBB+ |
| Hybrid bonds outstanding | Ba1 | BBB- |
| Short-term debt | $\mathrm{P}-2$ | F1 |
| Outlook | Stable | Stable |
2.1 Business model and strategy ..... 21
2.2 Innovation ..... 28
2.3 Business environment ..... 31
2.4 Major events ..... 36
2.5 Business performance ..... 40
2.6 Financial position and net worth ..... 52
2.7 Notes to the financial statements of RWE AG (holding company) ..... 57
2.8 Outlook ..... 59
2.9 Development of risks and opportunities ..... 61
2.10 Disclosure relating to German takeover law ..... 71
2.11 Group Sustainability Statement ..... 74
Since its foundation in 1898, RWE has consistently risen to overcome every obstacle. The challenge we are now facing is one of the biggest in our history. First and foremost, we want to play our part in making energy supply increasingly climatefriendly, whilst ensuring it remains reliable and affordable. To make this happen, we are investing billions in wind power, photovoltaics, battery storage, climate-friendly gas-fired power plants and electrolysis facilities. The pace we set mainly depends on the framework conditions in our core markets. We plan to make net investments of $€ 35$ billion from 2025 to 2030, which is less than previously envisaged. Despite this, we still expect to increase adjusted net income per share to about $€ 4$ by 2030. The key to this is flexible, return-oriented capital allocation.
Who we are and what we do. RWE is a leading international energy company headquartered in Essen, Germany, with a focus on electricity generation. Energy sources such as wind and solar as well as climate-friendly power stations are an increasingly important part of our business. Our core activities also include gas and electricity storage, energy trading, the hydrogen business, and innovative energy solutions for industrial customers. We generated revenues of $€ 24.2$ billion in fiscal 2024. Our key markets are Europe - led by Germany and the United Kingdom - and the USA. In the field of renewables, our geographic focus extends as far as Australia, Japan and South Korea. Our energy trading operations are also spread around the globe: in addition to trading floors in Essen, London and Swindon, we also operate branch offices in New York, Singapore, Shanghai, Jakarta and Tokyo.
Group structure with five segments. When reporting on the RWE Group's operational business, we distinguish between five segments: (1) Offshore Wind, (2) Onshore Wind/Solar, (3) Flexible Generation, (4) Supply \& Trading and (5) Phaseout Technologies. Segments (1) through (4) represent our core business. This is where we plan to grow. Under (5), we report our lignite business in the Rhenish coal-mining region and our German nuclear activities, which now only comprise the safe dismantling of decommissioned facilities.
Turning to the individual segments:
Flexible Generation: This segment, which was named 'Hydro / Biomass / Gas' until 2023, encompasses our run-of-river, pumped storage, biomass and gas power stations. It also comprises our Dutch power plant Eemshaven, which is fired with hard coal and biomass, battery storage systems as well as the project management and engineering consulting company RWE Technology International. Our stake in Austrian energy utility KELAG (37.9\%) is also part of this segment, along with our holding in Dutch power generator EPZ (30\%), which has been included since 2024. All of these activities are overseen by the management company RWE Generation, which is also responsible for designing and implementing our hydrogen strategy.
Supply \& Trading: Trading of electricity, pipeline gas, LNG and other energy-related commodities is allocated to this segment. It is managed by RWE Supply \& Trading. The company oversees a broad range of activities, which we set out in greater detail on page 25 .
Companies with cross-segment tasks such as the holding company RWE AG and balancesheet effects from the consolidation of Group activities are reported as part of the core business under 'other, consolidation'. This line item also includes our stake in German transmission system operator Amprion (25.1\%) and our shareholding in E.ON (15\%). However, the dividends we receive from E.ON are recognised in the financial result. In addition, this line item includes our $50 \%$ interest in URANIT, which holds a $33 \%$ stake in uranium enrichment specialist Urenco. Until 2023, this stake and our EPZ shareholding were subsumed under the 'Coal / Nuclear' segment.
Expectations of energy supply: environmentally friendly, reliable and affordable.
The energy industry is facing growing demands, particularly in relation to environmental concerns. Most of the countries in which we do business want to significantly reduce their greenhouse gas emissions from fossil fuel usage. However, they must also ensure that their energy supply remains both reliable and affordable. RWE wants to be a major player in the push to make this possible. We believe we have a part to play in the following areas:
Providing storage and climate-friendly backup plants. As energy supplies rely increasingly on wind and solar farms, energy storage systems and flexible backup capacity, which can reliably produce electricity when there is no wind and no sunshine (dark doldrums), are becoming ever more important. Batteries can play an important role in securing the power supply during short-term shortages. Modern gas-fired power stations are essential to bridging protracted dark doldrums. However, they must be operated in a climate-friendly way - either by capturing and storing carbon dioxide $\left(\mathrm{CO}{2}\right)$ emissions or by utilising climate-neutral fuels. Hydrogen $\left(\mathrm{H}{2}\right)$ has great potential in this regard as it can be produced without emitting $\mathrm{CO}_{2}$, e.g. if it is produced by electrolysis using renewable energy (green hydrogen).
Meeting the rising demand for electricity. Action also needs to be taken in the manufacturing, heating and transportation sectors. In 2023, oil, coal and gas covered over two-thirds of energy demand in the EU. Switching from fossil fuels to electricity produced using carbon-neutral methods would enable $\mathrm{CO}_{2}$ emissions to be reduced across all sectors. Electrifying the economy will cause power demand to rise significantly. New technology use cases, particularly in the area of AI, will also drive up energy consumption, necessitating the rapid expansion of green generation capacities.
The driving force behind the energy transition. RWE is actively engaged in all areas of activity mentioned. We are investing billions of euros in wind power, photovoltaics, battery storage and the hydrogen economy. We are taking steps to phase out coal-based generation, building climate-friendly capacities and helping companies to optimise their energy use. We aim to be carbon neutral by 2040 at the latest, ten years earlier than the EU. Not only does this apply to our own greenhouse gas emissions (Scope 1), but it also covers the upstream and downstream value chain (Scope 2 and 3). By 2030, we want to have reduced our Scope 1 and 2 emissions by around $68 \%$ and our Scope 3 emissions by $42 \%$ compared to 2022. At the UN Climate Change Conference held in Paris in 2015, the international community set its sights on limiting the increase in average global temperatures to ideally no more than 1.5 degrees Celsius compared to pre-industrial levels. Our strategy is in line with this commitment, as confirmed by the independent Science Based Targets initiative at the end of 2024.
Sustainability - at the heart of our corporate culture. Our mission statement 'Our energy for a sustainable life' expresses our purpose as a company and reaffirms our commitment to sustainability as a guiding principle of our actions. But although cutting greenhouse gas emissions is important to us, it is by no means our only priority. Sustainability has many dimensions. The expression is generally used within the context of environmental, social and governance (ESG) matters. Once a year, we subject the areas where we face our greatest challenges to a materiality assessment. It was conducted in accordance with the Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD) for the first time in 2024. As part of the process, we identify the areas we deem most critical. You can find more information on the materiality assessment, our ESG goals, and to what extent we have met these targets on pages 84 et seqq. of this report.
Growing Green - our strategic roadmap to 2030. We presented our Growing Green strategy at the Capital Markets Day in November 2023. In this context, we announced that we would make net investments (after deducting divestments) of about $€ 55$ billion in the expansion of our electricity generation, storage and electrolysis capacities during the seven-year period from 2024 to 2030. We have made good progress in rolling out Growing Green. Last year, our net capital expenditure totalled $€ 10$ billion - the highest level in 15 years. However, we also witnessed the framework conditions in the energy sector becoming less certain. For instance, it is unclear what course the US administration will chart for the expansion of wind energy. As a rule, we only invest under favourable economic and regulatory conditions. Otherwise, we spend funds in areas with a better risk-return ratio. One example of this is our share buyback programme, which we launched in November 2024 (see page 39). We now plan to make total net investments amounting to $€ 35$ billion in the six years from 2025 to 2030. This is about a quarter less than the sum we had originally envisaged for this period. Despite the lower capital expenditure, we still expect to be able to achieve an adjusted net income per share of about $€ 3$ in 2027. The target for 2030 remains in the order of $€ 4$ per share.
Turning to the individual components of our growth strategy:
Hydrogen. The hydrogen economy is a crucial part of the energy transition and a perfect complement to our business model. We want to be active along the entire value chain, from green electricity generation to electrolysis-based hydrogen production, hydrogen trading and hydrogen storage right through to the conclusion of individual supply agreements with major industrial customers. Our regional focus for these activities is on Germany, the Netherlands and the UK. We have already forged numerous partnerships with businesses and research institutes to drive the hydrogen economy. One example is the German GET H2 initiative, as part of which we will deliver 300 MW of electrolysis capacity at our Lingen site by 2027. Following extensive preparatory work, we started construction in 2024.
Energy trading and customer solutions. We rank among the world's leading energy traders and constantly seek to expand our expertise and reach. These activities are managed by RWE Supply \& Trading. The company's operations extend for beyond proprietary trading. For example, it sells power generated by the Group and procures the fuel and emission allowances required to produce this electricity. The objective here first and foremost is to limit price risks. On top of that, RWE Supply \& Trading is in charge of the commercial optimisation of our power plant dispatch, with associated earnings going to the individual operating companies. RWE's customers can also benefit from the expertise of our trading subsidiary through a wide range of products and services, ranging from traditional energy supply contracts and energy management solutions to sophisticated risk management concepts.
RWE Supply \& Trading also oversees our pipeline gas and LNG business. The company enters into long-term supply agreements with producers, organises gas transportation by booking pipelines, LNG tankers and regasification terminals, and optimises the timing of deliveries by using storage facilities. The principle applied here is, the greater the size and diversification of the purchasing and supply portfolios, the better the chances to commercially optimise them. The gas business also opens up opportunities for hydrogen activities. For example, in Brunsbüttel (near Hamburg), where we are already involved in constructing an LNG landing terminal, we are now looking to build a second terminal for importing green ammonia, which could then be converted into hydrogen.
Socially acceptable phaseout of coal-fired generation. Our growth programme is flanked by an accelerated coal exit. Eemshaven in the Netherlands is now the only RWE power station that uses hard coal as a fuel. It is co-fired with biomass. By law, we are required to either retrofit the plant to only run on biomass by the end of 2029 or shut it down. In Amer, our second biomass / hard coal power plant in the Netherlands, coal-fired generation was only permissible until the end of 2024. Since then, we have used 100\% biomass. Conversely, the phaseout of lignite, which we produce and use to generate electricity in the Rhenish mining region to the west of Cologne, is significantly more complex. We agreed with the German government and the state of North Rhine-Westphalia to stop producing electricity from lignite by 2030. We will do our utmost to protect our employees from any resulting social hardship. Comprehensive compensatory measures will be taken for the affected individuals, such as a statutory adjustment allowance. We are also helping to ensure that the Rhenish region remains structurally resilient and part of the energy sector. For example, in 2022 we set our sights on building 500 MW of wind and solar capacity in the area by the end of this decade as part of the 'Gigawattpakt NRW' initiative. We also want to repurpose our power station sites. The local infrastructure harbours significant potential for operating gas-fired power plants or battery storage systems such as the one in Neurath, which has a capacity of 84 MWh and went online in early 2025.
Nuclear power - our focus is on safe and efficient dismantling. Germany's last three nuclear power plants were shut down on 15 April 2023, including RWE's Emsland reactor in Lingen. Aside from our 30\% stake in the Dutch nuclear power station Borssele, this also marked the end of RWE's involvement in nuclear generation. We are now focused on ensuring that all assets that have been shut down are safely and efficiently dismantled and the waste is properly disposed of. Launching new energy-related activities on the former nuclear power sites is also a priority. One example of this is our gas-fired power plant in Biblis, which was completed in early 2023 and is used by transmission system operator Amprion to stabilise grid frequency.
RWE AG's management system. Our management system is geared towards sustainable, value-creating growth. It is based on RWE's strategic guidelines, which we develop by analysing the market environment and competitiveness of our business areas, identifying growth potential, and weighing up the opportunities and risks involved. Which projects are ultimately realised is at the discretion of the management of the operating company concerned. Major investments are approved by the Executive Board of RWE AG, which also determines the allocation of capital, long-term portfolio development and the type of financing.
To operationally manage the Group's activities, RWE deploys a groupwide planning and controlling system, which allows for timely, detailed insights into the current and prospective development of the company's financial position, assets and earnings. Based on the targets set by the Executive Board and management's expectations regarding the development of the business, once a year we deliver our medium-term and long-term plans, in which we forecast the development of key financial indicators. The medium-term plan contains the budget figures for the following fiscal year and planned figures for the two years thereafter. The Executive Board submits the plan to the Supervisory Board, which reviews and approves it.
We compile an internal forecast for each fiscal year, which is updated every quarter. Members of the Executive Board of RWE AG and the management boards of our main operating units meet regularly to assess the company's net worth, financial position and earnings, and revise the forecast. In the event that the forecast figures deviate significantly from the budget figures during a fiscal year, we analyse the underlying reasons and take necessary countermeasures. We also immediately notify the capital market if published forecasts need to be modified.
Key earnings indicators. We manage our core business focusing primarily on the following key financials: EBITDA, EBIT and net income, which we adjust by removing special items. EBITDA is defined as earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortisation. In order to improve its informational value in relation to the ordinary course of business, we make modifications: non-operating and non-recurring effects are removed and presented in the non-operating result. This applies to capital gains and losses, temporary effects from the fair valuation of derivatives, goodwill impairments, other relevant special items and as of 2024 - total earnings from our phaseout technologies coal and nuclear. Subtracting operating depreciation and amortisation from adjusted EBITDA yields adjusted EBIT. Adjusted net income is another key operating indicator for us. We determine it by eliminating the non-operating result from the reconciliation of net income. We also substitute the actual tax rate, which contains one-off effects, with a budgeted rate of $20 \%$, which we have derived in consideration of the (expected) taxable earnings in our core markets and local tax rates. Adjusted net income per share is another important management parameter for us. Depending on the development of framework conditions, we can achieve the targets we establish for this KPI by investing in our core business or adjusting our stock portfolio.
The main management parameter we have used for phaseout technologies since 2024 is adjusted cash flow. This figure is calculated by deducting net capital expenditure from operating cash flows. Furthermore, we eliminate effects relating to other periods from the (cash) utilisation of provisions and add (non-cash) effects of the formation or reversal of provisions relating to the period. For example, payments for $\mathrm{CO}_{2}$ emission certificates related to power produced in the previous year are deducted, whereas additions to provisions for future purchases of emission certificates allocable to current electricity generation are included.
Expected minimum return on investments. We primarily use the internal rate of return (IRR) to evaluate the attractiveness of investment projects and only pursue projects if - at the time of the investment decision - the IRR after taxes stays above a defined floor. We determine this key figure using the weighted average cost of capital (WACC). The required minimum returns are the sum of the WACC and project-specific risk premiums, which usually range from 150 to 350 basis points, depending on the technology or region in question. This range has been increased by 50 basis points compared to the presentation in the 2023 Annual Report.
Safeguarding our financial strength and creditworthiness. The RWE Group's financial position is analysed using cash flows from operating activities, amongst other things. We also attach special importance to the development of free cash flow, which is derived by deducting capital expenditure from cash flows from operating activities and adding proceeds from divestments and asset disposals. As mentioned earlier, we use adjusted cash flow as a key performance indicator for phaseout technologies. Net debt is another indicator of RWE's financial strength. It is calculated by deducting provisions for pensions and similar obligations, for the dismantling of renewable assets and for nuclear waste management from RWE's net financial position. Conversely, mining provisions and financial assets that we assign to these obligations are disregarded. The latter comprise our $15 \%$ stake in E.ON and our claim for compensation for the German lignite phaseout minus the payments already made by the federal government.
In managing our indebtedness, we orientate ourselves towards the leverage factor, which represents the ratio of net debt to adjusted EBITDA. As of 31 December 2024, it was 2.0. In future, we expect net debt to increase, as we will partially finance our growth investments by raising debt capital. To secure our solid investment grade rating, we have established a leverage factor cap, which is currently set at 3.0. As of 2026, the maximum this indicator should be is between 3.0 to 3.5 .
The energy transition presents power generators such as RWE with a range of challenges, not least from a technical perspective. Our ability to innovate and think outside the box is pivotal to our success. Last year, we launched and advanced over 200 innovation projects together with academic and industry partners. Some of the benefits of these initiatives are the ability to use renewable energy more efficiently, store more power, ramp up the hydrogen economy and reduce greenhouse gas emissions through innovative strategies such as carbon dioxide recycling.
Solutions for a sustainable energy system. Our contribution to the energy transition is not simply defined by the volume of our investments, but also by how innovative we are. RWE is constantly seeking new ways to make the energy transition more efficient and costeffective. We initiate research projects, provide the necessary funding, infrastructure and expertise, and are at times the first to put new methods into practice. Our activities in this area focus on developing solutions that help us increase the utilisation of renewable energy, expand energy storage, and drive the ramp-up of large-scale hydrogen $\left(\mathrm{H}_{2}\right)$ production. Our 1,248 patents and patent filings based on 224 inventions (as at the end of 2024) demonstrate how active we are when it comes to research and development (R\&D). Last year, we drove forward around 200 R\&D projects, with around 370 employees working full or part time on these endeavours. In so doing, we often work with other companies or research institutions, allowing us to benefit from their valuable insights. Another advantage is that the costs are then shouldered by many stakeholders. In 2024, our R\&D spending therefore amounted to a moderate $€ 18$ million (previous year: $€ 17$ million).
On the following pages, we present a small selection of our current innovation projects. They illustrate the breadth and depth of the challenges we face in light of the energy transition and demonstrate the creativity with which we are tackling them.
Blockage and wake effects: a key challenge in wind farm planning. Whenever we plan new wind farms, we calculate a whole host of parameters that affect both power and yield. One of these factors is the impact the turbines themselves can have on wind speeds. There are two main considerations in this regard: the first is that the presence of a wind turbine slightly slows down the airflow approaching it. In scientific circles, this is referred to as the blockage effect. The second is that the turbine extracts energy from the airflow, causing wind speed to reduce downstream of the turbine. This is known as the wake effect and can result in turbines 'stealing' each other's wind when positioned unfavourably or when the wind is blowing from the 'wrong' direction.
To understand these effects better, we initiated a number of R\&D projects. One such undertaking, referred to as 'Global Blockage Effect in Offshore Wind' (OWA-GloBE), was launched in 2020 and has since been completed. The project was carried out in collaboration with industry partners and research institutes and focused on taking measurements at our German offshore wind farms Nordsee Ost and Amrumbank West. It was the first time we were able to comprehensively assess the full impact of the blockage effect. By employing cutting-edge measurement methods such as the Dual Doppler LiDAR, a technique comparable to radar for optically determining wind speeds, we generated a wealth of data, setting a new industry standard for quantifying the impact of the blockage effect on offshore wind farms.
In our ongoing 'Controlled Cluster Wakes' (C²-Wakes) R\&D project, we are measuring wake effects and exploring strategies to minimise them, for example by optimal turbine positioning. The publicly funded undertaking is particularly relevant for the German wind industry. Given ambitious governmental targets, the German Bight and southern Baltic Sea are expected to see a significant increase in wind farm density. The interaction between new and neighbouring wind farms must therefore be considered when choosing a location and operating the turbines. $\mathrm{C}^{2}$-Wakes is being realised in collaboration with
partners and involves extensive wind measurements to validate models for calculating the wake effect. This data can also be used to gain insights into how to optimise wind form layouts. According to current plans, we expect to complete the assessments and bring $\mathrm{C}^{2}$-Wakes to a close in 2026.
Drones - speedy support for material deliveries and repairs at sea. The day-to-day operation of offshore wind forms presents optimisation opportunities, which we aim to innovatively harness through our R\&D efforts. Rough seas can be challenging when it comes to inspections, maintenance and repairs. To improve these daily workflows, we are testing unmanned logistics. The following example shows just how useful they could be: if offshore maintenance work reveals that replacement parts are needed, then the vessel is generally forced to return to the port to fetch the missing components. At times, the ship may even need to wait until the following day to make this return trip, by which time it may be needed elsewhere. The research initiative 'Cargo Drones' is looking into this conundrum. As part of our research, we tested an unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) capable of carrying loads of up to 4 kilograms completely autonomously across a 125 -kilometre stretch between the port and the helideck at the offshore substation. The drone is controlled by satellite and can travel at speeds of up to 100 kilometres an hour. UAVs are also able to carry materials from the ship up to the roof of the turbine nacelles, so as to avoid the need to laboriously hoist these materials by crane. We are also going to test this application, albeit with heavy lift drones designed for short-range operations. Furthermore, we are exploring the deployment of aerial vehicles to repair rotor blades. Depending on the scenario, our technicians may no longer be required to climb to the damaged area, making their work more efficient.
Batteries as power stations: new strategies for stabilising the grid in seconds. The more energy sources such as solar and wind contribute to power supply, the more challenging it is to ensure grid stability. Instantaneous reserves are key in this regard, i.e. fast-responding capacities that can be called upon within seconds of a frequency deviation. Conventional power plants generally provide this service by harnessing the kinetic energy of their turbines
and generators. However, if the energy landscape of tomorrow is to become increasingly less reliant on traditional power generation technologies, then we will need other reliably available power supply systems to act as a dependable reserve. For example, at our Moerdijk power plant in the Netherlands, one of our innovation projects is looking into advanced batteries. The initiative involves building a 7.5 MW storage system comprising lithium iron phosphate batteries, which is then connected to the high-frequency grid. The unit uses highly reactive measurement technology and specially programmed inverters to deliver output at a moment's notice. It is one of a range of system integration solutions we are working on as part of our OranjeWind offshore wind power project. The battery storage unit will commence a two-year pilot phase in the spring of 2025. During this time, together with transmission system operator TenneT, we will establish the technical requirements for optimally integrating batteries into network operations. Expanding on this, in 2024 we launched our 'SysStab2030' research project, which is being funded by the German Federal Ministry for Economic Affairs and Climate Action. One of the aims of this initiative is to determine the conditions large batteries must meet to sustain electricity grid stability even if there is a full shift to renewable energy. As part of our role as an associated partner, we are providing a battery storage unit for real-life testing.
RWE explores large-scale hydrogen production and storage. Carbon-free hydrogen can make a significant contribution to decarbonising the energy, industry and transport sectors. It is therefore a core component of the green transition in our markets. RWE is currently working on around 30 hydrogen projects centred on Germany, the Netherlands and the UK. The objective is to produce hydrogen on a large scale and build an expansive hydrogen network. One of our most important German hydrogen projects, which we are collaborating on with numerous companies and research institutes, is 'GET H2'. This project was launched in 2019 and covers the entire hydrogen value chain, from production and transport to usage. As part of the initiative, in 2020 RWE Generation joined forces with partners to launch the 'GET H2 Nukleus' project at the site of our Lingen power station. By 2027, we plan to have built three electrolysers on the site, each with a capacity of 100 MW. The German government has dedicated $€ 492$ million in funding to the project,
which will cover approximately half of our capital expenditure. The first two electrolysers have been ordered from Linde Engineering and the third will be supplied by Sunfire and Bilfinger. We expect to commence large-scale hydrogen production in 2025.
Another deliverable of the GET H2 initiative is Germany's first commercial hydrogen cavern storage facility, which is being built in Gronau-Epe by RWE Gas Storage West. We have received a funding commitment from the German government, this time in the amount of $€ 127$ million. We will be contributing around $€ 150$ million and want to utilise the facility to supply hydrogen to industrial customers. The facility comprises two coverns, one of which is currently being used for natural gas storage. From 2026, Gronau-Epe will start storing hydrogen, paving the way for commercial utilisation in 2027.
RWE and Westfalen AG launch hydrogen filling station joint venture. Hydrogen also has the potential to reduce greenhouse gas emissions on the roads. Although batteries are proving to be the most cost-effective option when it comes to cars, hydrogen fuel cells offer significant potential for long-haul transportation. For this to be a viable option, however, an expansive network of hydrogen filling stations is needed. To drive the construction of such a network, we joined forces with Westfalen AG, launching the 'two4H2' joint venture in 2024. Our partner will contribute the necessary know-how in terms of hydrogen transport and filling station operations and we will provide the hydrogen made by electrolysis. For now, two4H2 is focused on North Rhine-Westphalia and Lower Saxony. The first filling stations are being built near logistics centres, although locations on motorways could also be feasible.
$\mathrm{ECO}{2}$ Fuel: recycling $\mathrm{CO}{2}$ during synthetic fuel production. Hydrogen produced by electrolysis and batteries are the classic green energy carriers - but they aren't the only options. Synthetic fuels, produced from carbon dioxide and hydrogen, can also help bridge supply shortages on the electricity market. Exhaust fumes produced during efuel electrification are typically released into the atmosphere, meaning the combustion emits the same amount of carbon dioxide as previously stored in the fuel. Here at RWE, we are developing solutions for recycling this carbon dioxide. Our R\&D efforts in this area are part of the European $\mathrm{ECO}{2}$ Fuel research project, involving 15 other partners from six countries. At the Niederaussem Innovation Centre, we have taken our first step towards realising a closed carbon cycle for efuel. This involved feeding the exhaust gas of a 200 kW motor-powered electricity generator into a pilot $\mathrm{CO}{2}$ scrubbing facility. The carbon dioxide is therefore not released into the atmosphere, but is extracted from the exhaust gas and recycled to produce more efuel. With a recovery rate of over $95 \%$, this process can be repeated dozens of times. If the efuel was generated using biogenic carbon dioxide, for example by burning sewage sludge, and the recycling process used renewably generated hydrogen, then recycling a metric ton of carbon dioxide would prevent more than 60 metric tons of carbon dioxide from entering the atmosphere. The first successful trial runs managed to recover almost all carbon dioxide from the exhaust gas, achieving recovery rates of up to $99 \%$. By using the $\mathrm{CO}_{2}$ scrubbing facility, we have collected significant volumes of data on waste heat, which could be put to good use. The combination of heat and electricity makes recyclable efuels a promising proposition for industrial sites where both heat and power are needed.
The 2024 bumper election year brought a shift in power in two of our core markets, the UK and the USA, with direct implications for energy policy. In the UK, the newly elected Labour government is setting the stage for an accelerated expansion of climate-friendly generation technologies. Meanwhile, in the US, President Trump has introduced tariffs and called wind energy expansion plans into question. Across Europe, market conditions have stabilised following the turbulence caused by the war in Ukraine. Wholesale electricity and fuel prices trended significantly lower than in the two previous years. Our margins on the electricity we generate and sell on the wholesale market also mainly declined.
New US administration reevaluates wind projects. Upon taking office in January 2025, US President Donald Trump set a new course for the country's energy and climate policy by signing several executive orders. Among other things, he announced that the USA would withdraw from the Paris Climate Agreement and declared a national energy emergency in order to facilitate the development of new oil and gas fields as well as the construction of new power plants. Furthermore, President Trump suspended the issuance of any federal permits for offshore wind projects and ordered a comprehensive review of federal approval processes for proposed new wind farms. Initiatives on federally owned sites that have already been approved will also be subjected to an extensive review.
It is impossible to predict the consequences of the change of course in US energy policy for the expansion of renewable energy in the USA at this time. We currently assume that support for onshore wind projects in the construction phase is secure. However, we believe that the situation regarding our current offshore wind projects is more critical. Immediately after the presidential elections in November 2024, we decided to reduce our expenditure on these projects to a minimum for now. RWE holds the right to develop wind projects at three US coastal sites. The Community Offshore Wind project in the New York Bight has progressed the furthest, but has not yet reached the construction phase. We had already secured a preliminary offtake agreement for part of the electricity with the State of New York. However, it was not finalised as the turbine manufacturer rescinded its supply commitment and the contract did not cover the resulting added cost. We intend to continue all three offshore projects as soon as the framework conditions allow. As a result of the delays, our capital expenditure in 2025 and 2026 will be lower than budgeted. The savings will be transferred to a share buyback programme, on which we report on page 39.
USA: new tariffs - allegations of price dumping against solar module manufacturers from Southeast Asia. In February 2025, the US government decided to introduce a $25 \%$ tax on steel and aluminium imports. In addition, duties were imposed on goods from Canada, Mexico and China. Imports that are already subject to tariffs are also affected. The surcharge for products from China has been set at $10 \%$. Goods from Mexico and Canada are subject to a $25 \%$ tariff, although an exception has been made for Canadian fuel, which is taxed at $10 \%$. However, the tariffs for Canada and Mexico were suspended after the countries committed to strengthen controls along their borders to the United States.
Countries in Southeast Asia, where we source components for solar modules, are also affected by new tariffs. In late 2024, following an extensive probe, the US Department of Commerce declared that many solar module manufacturers in Cambodia, Malaysia, Thailand and Vietnam received subsidies, enabling them to sell their products at unfair prices in the USA, a practice known as dumping. The probe's findings are pending official confirmation, which is expected to be received in the second quarter of 2025. Despite this, provisional tariffs have already been imposed on the imports of most of the affected companies. These duties range between $21 \%$ and $271 \%$.
To limit risks in the supply chain arising from duties and other measures to curb imports in the USA, we sourced and stockpiled components for our ongoing projects early on. Moreover, we are diversifying our procurement sources and are stepping up our efforts to increase purchases from domestic manufacturers.
Following the federal elections on 23 February 2025, it remains unclear what direction the new government will take on energy policy. Based on the parties' statements in the lead-up to the election, it is likely that there will be no fundamental changes to German energy policy. Creating incentives for building new power plants is among the most pressing tasks. Due to the legally mandated coal phaseout, additional flexible generation assets are needed to ensure reliable power supply even during periods of low wind and solar availability. Following the collapse of the coalition, the minority government formed by the Social Democratic and Green parties put forward a draft bill for a Power Plant Security Act. It was announced following a six-week consultation process involving expert groups, businesses and interest groups. The bill stipulates that the first stage will be a tender which includes 12.5 GW of generation capacity and 500 MW in long-term storage solutions, with a comprehensive technology-agnostic capacity mechanism to follow in the next phase.
The 12.5 GW includes 10 GW of new gas-fired power stations, with 5 GW required to transition to hydrogen-based electricity generation from no later than the eighth year after commissioning. Existing plants retrofitted to run on hydrogen will contribute 2 GW , with 0.5 GW coming from power stations that will run on hydrogen from the outset ('hydrogen sprinters'). The legislative process for the German Power Plant Security Act could not be concluded ahead of the federal elections. At the editorial deadline for this report, it was not yet clear whether the new German government would consider the draft and, if so, whether any changes would be made. When the first auctions will take place was not apparent either. We intend to take part, provided the conditions are agreeable.
New UK government increasingly focuses on renewables. In the UK, the Labour government, elected in July 2024, injected fresh momentum into the country's energy and climate policy. In December 2024, Labour presented its 'Clean Power 2030 Action Plan', comprising a raft of investments aimed at modernising energy infrastructure. By the end of the decade, the country wants to make its energy supply almost entirely climate-neutral. The government plans to achieve this by accelerating the expansion of renewables, among other things. It is envisaged that onshore wind capacity could rise to between 27 GW and 29 GW by 2030, and offshore wind power could be boosted to between 43 GW and 50 GW. As of late 2024, Great Britain's capacity for the two technologies stood at 16 GW and 15 GW, respectively. Photovoltaic capacity, which amounted to 18 GW in late 2024, could rise to between 45 GW to 47 GW. Periods with limited wind and solar power could be bridged using batteries, nuclear power plants and gas-fired power stations. The latter will either need to be hydrogen capable, or use CCS technology to capture any carbon dioxide emitted during combustion and store it underground. It is envisaged that by 2030, only approximately $5 \%$ of electricity will be generated using conventional natural gas-fired power stations without CCS. To achieve these goals, the UK government anticipates the need for a capacity reserve of 35 GW . Moreover, it is planning to accelerate grid expansion, grid connectivity and approval processes, which it has identified as bottlenecks.
EU passes electricity market reform. In mid-2024, a reform of the European electricity market came into effect following final approval by both the European Parliament and the Council of Ministers. The reform was triggered by Russia's invasion of Ukraine and the resulting disruptions in the energy sector. By introducing the measures, the EU wants to reduce the electricity market's dependence on fuel imports and optimise it for the expansion of renewable electricity. There was no shift away from the supply-and-demand pricing model. The EU is also aiming to rely more on contracts for difference (CfDs) to give companies greater planning security for investments in zero-carbon generation assets. Capacity payments could also play an increasingly important role. The electricity market reform was finalised in 2023. More information is available on page 30 of the 2023 Annual Report.
Weak economy in European core markets. Based on current data, global economic output in 2024 increased by around 3\%. Our European markets could not keep up with this pace. The UK achieved modest growth of around 1\%, whereas the German economy contracted slightly. Relatively high interest rates and inflation figures as well as geopolitical uncertainties had a dampening effect. In Germany, energy costs also played a role. The USA's economy was more dynamic, staying roughly in line with the global average of 3\%.
Power consumption up on 2023. Electricity consumption rebounded after the previous year's downturn. According to initial estimates of the German Association of Energy and Water Industries (BDEW), German electricity consumption has risen by approximately 1.7\%, despite the economy's stagnation. Lower power prices contributed to this development. In the UK, experts estimate a rise of around 1\%. The USA is believed to have consumed $2 \%$ more electricity, which was driven largely by strong economic output. The ongoing expansion of energy-intensive IT infrastructure also had a noticeable impact.
Wind volumes in Europe slightly down year on year - modest increase in the USA. Utilisation and profitability of renewables assets are largely weather-dependent. Wind velocities are particularly important to our business. They fell slightly short of the longterm average and below the previous year's level at most RWE sites in Europe. Northern Scandinavia and parts of the North Sea were among the regions that bucked the trend. In the USA, wind conditions were on average better than in 2023, although some areas logged behind the long-term average. The utilisation of our run-of-river power plants can fluctuate significantly from year to year, as it depends on precipitation and meltwater volumes. In Germany, our main hydropower region, these volumes were notably higher than the long-term average and the previous year's elevated level.
| Average RWE wind form utilisation | Onshore | Offshore | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| $\%$ | 2024 | 2023 | 2024 | 2023 |
| Germany | 20 | 21 | $26^{1}$ | $24^{1}$ |
| United Kingdom | 28 | 26 | 39 | 40 |
| Netherlands | 27 | 30 | - | - |
| Poland | 28 | 28 | - | - |
| France | 24 | 29 | - | - |
| Spain | 22 | 22 | - | - |
| Italy | 22 | 24 | - | - |
| Sweden | 27 | 28 | 46 | 47 |
| USA | 31 | 29 | - | - |
1 Volume losses due to curtailments by the grid operator.
Wholesale gas prices down. The utilisation and earnings of our conventional power plants are dependent on the development of electricity, fuel and emission allowance prices. Last year, they fell short of the level witnessed in 2023.
Natural gas, our most important fuel, became significantly cheaper. Averaged for the year, spot prices at the Dutch Title Transfer Facility (TTF) amounted to $€ 34 /$ MWh in 2024, compared to $€ 41 /$ MWh in the year prior. This was due to the easing of the gas supply situation despite the continued war in Ukraine. The mild winter of 2023/2024 and the weak economy also played a part. This development was also reflected in gas forward trading prices. The TTF forward for 2025 averaged $€ 37 /$ MWh last year. By way of comparison, in 2023, the 2024 TTF forward traded at $€ 52 /$ MWh.
Gas also became cheaper in the USA. At Henry Hub, the country's most important trading point, where gas prices are quoted in US dollars per million British thermal units (MMBtu), spot deliveries were priced at an average of US $\$ 2.20 / \mathrm{MMBtu}$ in 2024, compared to US $\$ 2.54 / \mathrm{MMBtu}$ in the previous year. At the end of the unusually mild 2023/2024 winter, North American gas storage facilities were fuller than usual, reducing the need for replenishment over the summer. This, in turn, dampened prices. The drop in demand was offset to some extent by additional LNG exports. On the forward market, the calendar year-ahead price averaged US $\$ 3.37 / \mathrm{MMBtu}$ in 2024, having been US $\$ 3.48 / \mathrm{MMBtu}$ in 2023.
$\mathrm{CO}{2}$ emission allowances cheaper than in 2023. The cost of procuring $\mathrm{CO}{2}$ emission allowances is an important factor for fossil fuel-fired power stations. A European Union Allowance (EUA), entitling the holder to emit one metric ton of carbon dioxide, traded at an average of $€ 69$ in 2024 compared to $€ 89$ the year prior. This figure relates to forward contracts that mature in December of the following year. After reaching record highs of over $€ 100$ in February 2023, quotations in emissions trading experienced a downward trend that persisted until early 2024. Prices then stagnated at around the $€ 70$ mark, where they remained until the end of the year. Price-dampening factors included weak demand for EUAs from industry, driven by economic conditions, and low utilisation of comparatively emission-intensive coal-fired power plants. In addition, since mid-2023 the EU has been putting additional EUAs into circulation to raise funds to finance the REPowerEU Plan.
In the UK, where a national emissions trading system was established after Brexit, the cost of emitting carbon dioxide also decreased. One UK Allowance (UKA), which like one EUA, entitles the holder to emit one metric ton of carbon dioxide, averaged $€ 41$ in 2024 compared to $€ 59$ the year prior. Factors similar to those in the EU came to bear here, such as weak industrial production and declining emissions from power generation in particular.
Electricity prices fall as fuel markets relax. Wholesale electricity prices dropped, mirroring developments on the fuel and emission allowances markets. In the fiscal year that just ended, base-load power traded for an average of $€ 80 / \mathrm{MWh}$ on the German spot market, compared to $€ 95 / \mathrm{MWh}$ in 2023. Spot prices in the United Kingdom declined from $€ 94 / \mathrm{MWh}$ to $€ 72 / \mathrm{MWh}$. Electricity forward trading pointed the following picture: in Germany, the 2025 base-load forward cost an average of $€ 89 / \mathrm{MWh}$ last year, whereas the same contract for 2024 was quoted at $€ 137 / \mathrm{MWh}$ in 2023. In the United Kingdom, the price of the one-year forward declined from $€ 125 / \mathrm{MWh}$ to $€ 80 / \mathrm{MWh}$.
The North American electricity market is subdivided into different regions, which are managed by independent grid companies. Currently, the most important market for us is Texas, where the grid is operated by the Electric Reliability Council of Texas (ERCOT). Many of our US wind and solar farms are connected to this grid and a significant part of their generation is sold at market conditions. The ERCOT electricity spot price averaged US $\$ 26 / \mathrm{MWh}$ in 2024, which is US $\$ 29 / \mathrm{MWh}$ less than in the year prior. Declining gas prices, more renewable electricity feed-ins and depressed electricity demand as a result of reduced air conditioning use due to the weather all contributed to this development. Conversely, the one-year forward rose by US $\$ 3 / \mathrm{MWh}$ to US $\$ 49 / \mathrm{MWh}$, in part due to the markets expecting electricity demand to increase.
Declining margins on electricity forward sales. To mitigate market risks in electricity generation, we seek state-guaranteed feed-in tariffs or long-term fixed-price contracts with retail key accounts. This mainly relates to electricity from renewables. The majority of our generation is hedged through transactions on the electricity forward market. This also applies to the procurement of fuel and emission allowances. We conduct these hedging activities with a lead time of up to three years. The generation margins we realised with these transactions in 2024 were below the average achieved in 2023. Only the margins of our German lignite and gas-fired power stations rose. Thanks to the persistently high volatility of spot prices, we were once again able to achieve strong earnings from the commercial optimisation of our power plant dispatch, albeit not to the same extent as in the previous year.
In 2024, we made good progress in advancing our growth strategy. In our offshore wind business, we secured six new projects, identified partners for ongoing endeavours and made the final investment decisions for three wind farms in the North Sea. We continued our onshore wind and photovoltaic expansion into 2024, particularly in the USA. At the same time, we shut down multiple German lignite units and converted Amer power station in the Netherlands to run exclusively on biomass as part of our efforts to continue reducing our carbon footprint. In this chapter, we present the major events that occurred in the period between January 2024 and February 2025, focusing on developments which have not been discussed in more detail elsewhere in the combined management report.
RWE awarded rights to two new wind power sites in German North Sea. In August 2024, we successfully participated in an auction for the rights to use German sites for offshore wind. The Federal Network Agency announced that we had been awarded two tendered areas in the German North Sea: N-9.1 and N-9.2. These sites are located over 100 kilometres northwest of the island of Borkum. Each has the potential to be home to 2 GW of generation capacity. Both projects will be developed in partnership with TotalEnergies. The French group, with whom we are also collaborating on the Dutch offshore wind farm project OranjeWind (see next page), took a 50\% equity stake in October. Together, RWE and TotalEnergies will pay $€ 250$ million for both sites, with $10 \%$ falling due when the project starts and $90 \%$ spread over the first 20 years of the wind farms' operation. The investment decisions are expected to be made no later than 2027 (N-9.1) and 2028 (N-9.2). The wind farms could then take all turbines online by 2031 and 2032, respectively. We have not been granted a government-backed guaranteed price for the electricity generated.
Go-ohead given for construction of two offshore wind farms to the north of Juist. In May 2024, we made the investment decision for Nordseecluster A and B, two German offshore wind farms located around 50 kilometres to the north of Juist island. The sites have a capacity of 660 MW and 900 MW and are expected to be completed in early 2027 and early 2029. We plan to market the electricity from the wind farms mainly through long-term contractual agreements with industrial and municipal customers to support their decarbonisation journeys.
RWE takes on three major UK offshore wind power projects from Vattenfall. In March 2024, we acquired three offshore wind projects off the coast of Norfolk in the east of England from Swedish energy company Vattenfall. The agreed purchase price corresponds to a portfolio value of $£ 963$ million. Each of the three projects - Norfolk Vanguard West, Norfolk Vanguard East and Norfolk Boreas - has a potential generation capacity of up to 1.4 GW. The first two have made the most progress. Based on current planning, they could be completed as early as the end of this decade.
RWE and Masdar to co-develop wind power venture on Dogger Bank. We have formed a partnership with Abu Dhabi-based clean energy firm Masdar to realise two offshore wind projects, which are planned for the southern section of Dogger Bank in the British North Sea. The joint venture agreement became effective at the end of February 2024. Masdar now holds a $49 \%$ stake in both Dogger Bank South projects and has reimbursed RWE the corresponding project costs incurred to date. RWE owns $51 \%$ and is responsible for constructing and operating the assets. The two wind farms could each have an installed capacity of up to 1.5 GW and be completed by late 2031.
TotalEnergies and RWE join forces to deliver OranjeWind offshore wind farm. A joint venture between RWE and TotalEnergies will deliver the Dutch offshore wind project OranjeWind. In late July 2024, the French energy group acquired a 50\% stake in the project. At the same time, the final investment decision for the 795 MW wind farm was taken. OranjeWind, which will be built 53 kilometres from the city of IJmuiden in the Dutch province of North Holland, is the Netherlands' first system integration project: RWE and TotalEnergies have committed to implementing measures that enable fluctuating wind power generation to be utilised when needed. In doing so, we will rely on electrolysers for producing green hydrogen, EV charging stations, battery storage systems, and electric boilers. RWE is responsible for developing, building and ultimately operating the wind farm. All turbines are expected to go online in 2028.
Seabed rights for first offshore wind project in Australia secured. The Australian government has granted us the licence to develop an offshore wind project in the southeastern state of Victoria. The site we have been awarded could potentially accommodate up to 2 GW of generation capacity. It is located 67 kilometres off the coast of Gippsland and has an average water depth of 59 metres. We hold the exclusive rights to develop the project for the next seven years and the right to apply for a licence to build and operate the wind farm. Based on current plans, the project could be operational in the early 2030s.
British CfD auctions: RWE secures strike prices for five new build projects. At a recent auction in the UK, we were awarded Contracts for Difference (CfD) for two onshore wind and three photovoltaic projects, which together could account for 218 MW of generation capacity. The outcome of the tender process was announced in early September. The strike price set at the auction was $£ 50.90 / \mathrm{MWh}$ for electricity from onshore wind farms and $£ 50.07 / \mathrm{MWh}$ for solar power. As these figures are based on 2012 prices and are inflation-indexed, actual guaranteed prices will be significantly higher. The UK supports
renewable energy via the Contracts for Difference mechanism. Under this system, if plant operators realise a wholesale price for the electricity below the strike price set at auction, they receive a payment to cover the difference. If it is above the strike price, they must pay back the difference.
Major wind and solar farms in the USA up and running. Over the past fiscal year, we have taken steps to considerably expand our wind and solar portfolio. Most of the additional assets are located in the USA, where we completed the Willowbrook (150 MW), Bright Arrow (300 MW) and Peregrine (300 MW) solar farms. Willowbrook is situated in the state of Ohio and commenced commercial operation in January 2024. Bright Arrow and Peregrine followed suit in May and December, respectively, and are both located in Texas. The Bright Arrow site is also home to a battery with an output of 100 MW and a storage capacity of 200 MWh , designed to optimise the timing of solar power feed-ins into the local grid. We also took significant strides in expanding our onshore wind power capacity. The largest individual project completed in 2024 was Montgomery Ranch in Texas (203 MW). The wind farm's 45 turbines have been operating commercially since June.
Long-term power purchase agreements with Microsoft, Meta and Rivian. Last year, we concluded a number of long-term power purchase agreements with US businesses, including Microsoft, Meta and Rivian. As announced in May 2024, Microsoft will be procuring the power from Peyton Creek II (243 MW) and Lane City (203 MW), two wind farms under construction in Texas. In August, we agreed to supply Meta with the power from our County Run Solar (274 MW) and Lafitte Solar (100 MW) solar farms, which are currently being built in the US states of Illinois and Louisiana. In October, we concluded a 15-year offtake agreement with Rivian. The American EV manufacturer will receive electricity from our 127 MW onshore wind farm Champion Wind in Texas, which is being repowered. All three contractual partners have set themselves ambitious emissions reduction targets when it comes to their energy supply. Rivian, for example, is looking to power its fast-charging network with $100 \%$ renewable energy.
RWE to collaborate with Peabody on green power projects on reclaimed mining land. In November, we agreed to work with US coal producer Peabody to advance renewable energy development. The collaboration will fall under the remit of R3 Renewables, a company founded by Peabody, Summit Partners Credit Advisors and Riverstone Credit Partners. Peabody's two co-shareholders transferred their stakes to us in November. We now hold a $75 \%$ interest in R3 Renewables and Peabody holds the remaining $25 \%$. The collaboration allows us to use Peabody's reclaimed mining sites, which are largely located in the US Midwest. Developing solar and battery storage projects on an industrial scale is at the core of the collaboration. R3 Renewables has already pre-developed ten ventures in the states of Indiana and Illinois, which could deliver 5.5 GW of generation capacity.
Germany approves funding for three RWE hydrogen projects. In July 2024, we were awarded federal funding for three German hydrogen projects. Funds totalling $€ 619$ million were allocated to two endeavours, which we are developing independently: the construction of a 300 MW electrolyser in Lingen (Lower Saxony) belonging to the GET $\mathrm{H}_{2}$ Nukleus project, and of a hydrogen storage facility in Gronau-Epe (North Rhine-Westphalia). We report on both projects in more detail on pages 29 et seq. A third funding commitment for $€ 199$ million went to a consortium, of which RWE is a member, with plans to build a 100 MW electrolyser as part of the HyTechHafen Rostock project (Mecklenburg-Western Pomerania). The government is providing $70 \%$ of the funds for all three ventures, with 30\% being contributed by the federal states where the projects are located. In February, the EU confirmed that the projects were of mutual European interest, thus paving the way for funding at national level.
Success at British capacity market auction. In February 2024, a British capacity market auction was held for the period from 1 October 2027 to 30 September 2028. We were awarded capacity payments for all participating RWE power plants. These stations, which are almost exclusively gas-fired, have a combined secured capacity of 6,353 MW. The auction cleared at $£ 65$ per kilowatt plus inflation adjustment. We will receive the payments for making our assets available during the above period and thus contributing to security of supply.
Gersteinwerk once again selected for German capacity reserve. Our natural gas combined-cycle units F, G and K1 at the Gersteinwerk site in Werne (Westphalia) have been included in the German capacity reserve for the period from 1 October 2024 to 30 September 2026. The decision was taken in February 2024 as part of a tender process organised by the German transmission system operators. Altogether, the plants will provide a total of 820 MW of capacity which can be used to ensure security of supply. We will receive a capacity payment of $€ 99.99$ per kilowatt and year. Units $F$ and $G$ had already submitted winning bids in the first two tender rounds of this kind. As reserve power stations, they have not operated on the regular electricity market since 1 October 2020 and can only be fired up when required to do so by the transmission system operator. By contrast, unit K1 participated in the capacity reserve tender procedure for the first time.
Dutch power station Amer retrofitted to run on 100\% biomass. Since January 2025, we have been exclusively firing our Dutch power station Amer with biomass. This is because, by law, we were only allowed to co-fire coal at the plant until the end of 2024. Amer was originally a purely hard coal-fired power station. We began co-firing it with biomass back in 2000, gradually increasing the share of this fuel in the blend over the following years. Our biomass meets the strictest sustainability criteria. We only source it from certified suppliers.
Lignite phaseout: RWE shuts down six power plant units. In late March 2024, we decommissioned five lignite-fired power plant units in the Rhenish coal mining region. The units in question were Niederaussem E (295 MW) and F (299 MW), as well as Neurath C (292 MW), D (607 MW) and E (604 MW). On 1 January 2025, Unit F (321 MW) at our Weisweiler lignite-fired power station followed suit. The blocks have a combined capacity of 2.4 GW and were shut down as part of Germany's coal phaseout. Our carbon dioxide emissions will decrease significantly as a result. Since 2020, we have shut down 14 of 21 lignite-fired units, reducing our capacity from this technology to 5.8 GW. We have also stopped producing briquettes and plan to discontinue all lignite operations by the end of March 2030.
Structural change in the Rhenish region: RWE sells site to Microsoft. In April 2024, we sold land in the Rhenish lignite mining region to Microsoft. The site is located at Bergheim in the Rhine-Erft district. The software developer has announced plans to build a large data centre on it. A second plot of land in the vicinity, which Microsoft purchased from the City of Bedburg, is envisaged to serve the same purpose. In addition to developing data infrastructure to harness artificial intelligence and cloud technologies, the company also plans to launch a regional initiative focusing on training young adults for careers in IT.
RWE launches $€ 1.5$ billion share buyback programme. In November 2024, the Executive Board of RWE AG decided on a share buyback with a volume of up to $€ 1.5$ billion. The decision was taken on the back of delays in investments related to US offshore wind power and the European hydrogen business, which freed up funds. The repurchased shares will be cancelled. We will implement the buyback programme in three tranches of $€ 500$ million each. The buyback of the first tranche began on 28 November 2024 and is slated to be completed by no later than 28 May 2025. The buyback of all three tranches is expected to take up to 18 months. The process is being carried out on the basis of and in accordance with the authorisation granted by the Annual General Meeting of RWE AG on 4 May 2023, permitting the buyback of shares representing up to $10 \%$ of the company's capital stock. However, the authorisation will expire on 3 May 2025. We will therefore propose that the Annual General Meeting on 30 April 2025 reauthorise the Executive Board to buy back RWE shares. The transactions are being conducted via the electronic trading system of the Frankfurt Stack Exchange (Xetra) and selected multilateral trading systems within the European Union. In fiscal 2024, 4,448,369 shares were already purchased as part of the programme.
RWE can look back on a successful 2024 fiscal year. We posted adjusted EBITDA of $€ 5.7$ billion. This is more than what we forecast at the beginning of the year. Our adjusted EBIT and adjusted net income also came in above plan. This was partially thanks to a strong performance in the Supply \& Trading and Flexible Generation segments. However, as expected, they were unable to match the unusually strong earnings registered in the previous year. The continued expansion of renewable energy also had a positive impact. We increased our wind and solar capacity by $10 \%$ last year. Gross capital expenditure totalled $€ 11.2$ billion, the highest level recorded in 15 years.
Group structure features five segments. In our financial reporting, we divide the RWE Group into the five following segments, the first four of which form our core business: (1) Offshore Wind, (2) Onshore Wind / Solar, (3) Flexible Generation, (4) Supply \& Trading, and (5) Phaseout Technologies. More detailed information on the segments can be found on pages 21 et seq. We made several adjustments to our reporting, which became effective as of 1 January 2024. Segments (3) and (5) were renamed (from Hydro / Biomass / Gas and Coal / Nuclear). The assignment of our shareholdings in Dutch nuclear power plant operator EPZ (30\%) and Germany-based URANIT (50\%) also changed. They were previously allocated to Phaseout Technologies and are now included in the Flexible Generation segment (EPZ) and the 'other, consolidation' line item (URANIT). We have restated the figures for 2023 to ensure they are comparable.
New methodology for reporting earnings from Phaseout Technologies. In fiscal 2024, we stopped reporting adjusted EBITDA / EBIT for our German lignite and nuclear activities. We now recognise their operating gains and losses as part of the non-operating result. We adjusted the previous year's figures accordingly. The change in reporting reflects the way we manage Phaseout Technologies, where we focus on adjusted cash flow. We have explained how we calculate this indicator on page 55. The commercial development of Phaseout Technologies is now portrayed using adjusted cash flow.
Modified recognition of variation margins. Credit rating agencies place great importance on funds from operations. To make this indicator more conclusive, they remove temporary effects from sureties for futures transactions (variation margins). Against this backdrop, we stopped recognising variation margins in funds from operations. Instead, we recognise them entirely in the cash flow statement under the 'changes in working capital' line item, which had already included some variation margins in the past. The previous year's figures have been restated to reflect the new allocation.
New accounting treatment for capacity reserve at Gersteinwerk site. Our F, G and K1 combined-cycle natural gas units at the Gersteinwerk location in Werne (Westphalia) became part of the German capacity reserve as of 1 October 2020 (F/G) and 1 October 2024 (K1). Transmission system operator Amprion is now responsible for deploying these assets. We initially accounted for the provision of this reserve capacity as a pending transaction. Since the beginning of 2024, we have been recognising this as a finance lease pursuant to IFRS 16. This was taken into account retroactively for the 2023 figures. On the balance sheet, we no longer report on the power stations (property, plant and equipment) and instead recognise receivables from finance leasing in the amount of the discounted future cash flows. This change in accounting treatment also has an effect on both the income statement and the cash flow statement, but not on adjusted EBITDA.
| Power generation ${ }^{1}$ | Renewables | Pumped storage, batteries | Gas | Lignite | Other $^{2}$ | Total | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 2023 | 2024 | 2023 | 2024 | 2023 | 2024 | 2023 | 2024 | 2023 | 2024 | 2023 | |
| Offshore Wind | 10,996 | 10,963 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 10,996 | 10,963 |
| Orshore Wind/Solar | 32,387 | 28,460 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 32,387 | 28,460 |
| Flexible Generation | 5,413 | 5,818 | 158 | 158 | 32,170 | 42,061 | - | - | 4,860 | 5,513 | 42,601 | 53,550 |
| of which: | ||||||||||||
| Germany | 2,055 | 1,719 | 158 | 158 | 4,540 | 5,340 | - | - | 146 | 198 | 6,899 | 7,415 |
| United Kingdom | 524 | 582 | - | - | 18,662 | 27,829 | - | - | - | - | 19,186 | 28,411 |
| Netherlands | 2,834 | 3,517 | - | - | 5,807 | 6,033 | - | - | 4,714 | 5,315 | 13,355 | 14,865 |
| Türkiye | - | - | - | - | 3,161 | 2,859 | - | - | - | - | 3,161 | 2,859 |
| Phaseout Technologies | - | - | - | - | 149 | 99 | 31,457 | 34,285 | 211 | 2,344 | 31,817 | 36,728 |
| RWE Group | 48,796 | 45,241 | 158 | 158 | 32,319 | 42,160 | 31,457 | 34,285 | 5,071 | 7,857 | 117,801 | 129,701 |
1 Figures reported in accordance with IFRS accounting, i.e. generation of fully consolidated companies is recognised in full, whereas activities in which we own minority shoreholdings are generally not recognised. Changes in reporting triggered adjustments to prior-year figures; see commentary on page 40.
2 Including generation volumes attributable to hard coal firing at the Dutch Amer and Eernshoven power stations as well as electricity volumes produced by the German Emsland nuclear power station in 2023 until it was decommissioned on 15 April.
Electricity production down - renewables post strong gain. Last year, RWE generated 117,801 GWh of electricity. Of this, $41 \%$ was from renewables, clearly exceeding the shore accounted for by coal ( $30 \%$ ). Our power production declined by $9 \%$ compared to 2023. This was primarily because our gas-fired power stations in the UK were deployed less than in the previous year: in addition to maintenance outages, less favourable market conditions came to bear. Market factors were also a major reason why we produced less electricity from hard coal in the Netherlands. In our German lignite-fired generation
business, plant closures due to Germany's legally mandated coal phaseout led to a decline in generation. As set out on page 39, we shut down the Niederaussem E and F units as well as the Neurath C, D and E units in the Rhenish mining region at the end of March 2024, reducing total capacity by 2.1 GW . Further volume shortfalls were registered because the Emsland nuclear power station in Lingen was decommissioned on 15 April 2023: we stopped producing nuclear power in Germany on that date.
| Power generation from renewables ${ }^{1}$ | Offshore Wind | Onshore Wind | Solar | Hydro | Biomass | Total | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GWh | 2024 | 2023 | 2024 | 2023 | 2024 | 2023 | 2024 | 2023 | 2024 | 2023 | 2024 | 2023 |
| Germany | 2,152 | 1,968 | 1,314 | 1,316 | 93 | 49 | 2,055 | 1,719 | - | - | 5,614 | 5,052 |
| United Kingdom | 8,648 | 8,799 | 1,939 | 1,799 | - | - | 172 | 185 | 352 | 398 | 11,111 | 11,181 |
| Netherlands | - | - | 897 | 990 | 22 | 26 | 29 | 20 | 2,777 | 3,467 | 3,725 | 4,503 |
| Poland | - | - | 1,361 | 1,255 | 59 | 29 | - | - | - | - | 1,420 | 1,284 |
| France | - | - | 314 | 321 | - | - | - | - | - | - | 314 | 321 |
| Spain | - | - | 946 | 963 | 444 | 254 | - | - | - | - | 1,390 | 1,217 |
| Italy | - | - | 937 | 1,022 | - | - | - | - | - | - | 937 | 1,022 |
| Sweden | 196 | 196 | 298 | 290 | - | - | - | - | - | - | 494 | 486 |
| USA | - | - | 12,803 | 11,423 | 10,241 | 8,118 | - | - | - | - | 23,044 | 19,541 |
| Australia | - | - | - | - | 500 | 476 | - | - | - | - | 500 | 476 |
| Rest of the world | - | - | 21 | 28 | 226 | 130 | - | - | - | - | 247 | 158 |
| RWE Group | 10,996 | 10,963 | 20,830 | 19,407 | 11,585 | 9,082 | 2,256 | 1,924 | 3,129 | 3,865 | 48,796 | 45,241 |
1 Figures reported in accordance with IFRS accounting, i.e. generation of fully consolidated companies is recognised in full, whereas activities in which we own minority shareholdings are generally not recognised.
Our electricity production from renewables was up 8\%. It increased above all in our photovoltaics business, where we posted a gain of $28 \%$. This was because we recently expanded our solar capacity substantially, above all in the USA. The acquisition of US energy firm Con Edison Clean Energy Businesses as of 1 March 2023 was a major step forward (see page 35 of the 2023 Annual Report). As part of the transaction, we received an extensive solar portfolio, which contributed to the Group's power production for the entire reporting period for the first time in 2024. Furthermore, we have commissioned several large-scale solar farms since the acquisition. Our electricity generation from wind rose by $5 \%$. The main driver was the expansion of our onshore wind capacity.
In addition to our in-house generation, we procure electricity from suppliers outside of the Group, particularly in our key account supply business. In the period under review, these purchases totalled 49,467 GWh (previous year: 36,499 GWh).
| Installed capacity ${ }^{1}$ | Renewables | Pumped storage, batteries | Gas | Lignite | Other $^{2}$ | Total | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| As of 31 December 2024, MW | 2024 | 2023 | 2024 | 2023 | 2024 | 2023 | 2024 | 2023 | 2024 | 2023 | 2024 | 2023 |
| Offshore Wind | 3,515 | 3,515 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 3,515 | 3,515 |
| Onshore Wind/Solar | 14,364 | 12,645 | 814 | 580 | - | - | - | - | - | - | 15,179 | 13,225 |
| Flexible Generation | 1,281 | 1,281 | 431 | 291 | 15,592 | 15,572 | - | - | 1,794 | 1,920 | 19,098 | 19,064 |
| of which: | ||||||||||||
| Germany | 377 | 377 | 431 | 291 | 4,127 | 4,127 | - | - | 53 | 53 | 4,988 | 4,848 |
| United Kingdom | 133 | 133 | - | - | 6,969 | 6,949 | - | - | 253 | 253 | 7,355 | 7,335 |
| Netherlands | 771 | 771 | - | - | 3,709 | 3,709 | - | - | 1,489 | 1,615 | 5,968 | 6,094 |
| Türkiye | - | - | - | - | 787 | 787 | - | - | - | - | 787 | 787 |
| Phaseout Technologies | - | - | - | - | 400 | 400 | $5,832^{3}$ | 8,250 | 27 | 27 | $6,259^{3}$ | 8,677 |
| RWE Group ${ }^{4}$ | 19,160 | 17,441 | 1,252 | 878 | 15,992 | 15,975 | 5,832 | 8,250 | 1,821 | 1,947 | 44,057 | 44,491 |
1 Figures reported in accordance with IFRS accounting, i.e. generation capacities of fully consolidated companies are recognised in full, whereas activities in which we own minority shareholdings are generally not recognised. On a pro-rotto basis, RWE's generation capacity at the end of 2024 amounted to 46.1 GW , of which 37.6 GW was attributable to renewable energy assets and flexible generation capacities (excluding cool-fired power plants). Changes in reporting (see page 40) and the method used to recognise capacity triggered adjustments to some prior-year figures.
2 Including the share of production capacity of the Dutch Amer (only 2023) and Earnohaven power stations which is attributable to hard cool firing.
3 Figure no longer includes the Weisweiler F límite unit. It was officially decommissioned os of 1 Jonuary 2025, but stopped producing electricity ot the end of 2024.
4 Including insignificant capacity in the Supply \& Trading segment.
RWE's generation capacity: share of renewables up to $43 \%$. As of 31 December 2024, we had an installed power production capacity of 44.1 GW . Despite the closure of lignitefired units totalling 2.4 GW , the figure only changed marginally compared to 2023 (44.5 GW). This was because we commissioned new wind farms, solar farms and battery storage systems with a combined capacity of 2.1 GW. Amounting to 1.6 GW , the lion's shore was added in the USA, where we completed the Bright Arrow and Peregrine solar farms ( 300 MW each) as well as the Montgomery Ranch onshore windfarm (203 MW) in the year under review (see page 37).
At 19.2 GW, renewable energy accounted for the single-largest portion ( $43 \%$ ) of our generation capacity by the end of 2024. Second place was taken by natural gas with 16.0 GW ( $36 \%$ ). Our biggest source of renewable energy is wind ( 12.2 GW ), followed by solar ( 5.7 GW ), biomass ( 0.8 GW ), and hydro ( 0.5 GW ).
The geographic focus of our generation business is Germany, where 30\% of our installed capacity is located. The United Kingdom and the USA each account for $24 \%$. Based solely on renewable energy, the United States takes the lead, with a share of $50 \%$.
| Installed capacity based on renewables ${ }^{1}$ | Offshore Wind | Onshore Wind | Solar | Hydro | Biomass | Total | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| As of 31 December 2024, MW | 2024 | 2023 | 2024 | 2023 | 2024 | 2023 | 2024 | 2023 | 2024 | 2023 | 2024 | 2023 |
| Germany | 940 | 940 | 803 | 750 | 90 | 44 | 376 | 376 | 1 | 1 | 2,209 | 2,110 |
| United Kingdom | 2,527 | 2,527 | 800 | 802 | - | - | 78 | 78 | 55 | 55 | 3,460 | 3,462 |
| Netherlands | - | - | 381 | 383 | 27 | 27 | 11 | 11 | 742 | 742 | 1,160 | 1,163 |
| Poland | - | - | 557 | 557 | 83 | 34 | - | - | - | - | 639 | 591 |
| France | - | - | 164 | 150 | - | - | - | - | - | - | 164 | 150 |
| Spain | - | - | 493 | 493 | 242 | 152 | - | - | - | - | 736 | 645 |
| Italy | - | - | 527 | 473 | 9 | - | - | - | - | - | 536 | 473 |
| Sweden | 48 | 48 | 124 | 124 | - | - | - | - | - | - | 172 | 172 |
| USA | - | - | 4,815 | 4,667 | 4,811 | 3,550 | - | - | - | - | 9,625 | 8,217 |
| Australia | - | - | - | - | 314 | 314 | - | - | - | - | 314 | 314 |
| Rest of the world | - | - | 10 | 10 | 135 | 135 | - | - | - | - | 145 | 145 |
| RWE Group | 3,515 | 3,515 | 8,673 | 8,408 | 5,709 | 4,255 | 465 | 465 | 798 | 798 | 19,160 | 17,441 |
1 Figures reported in accordance with IFRS accounting, i.e. fully consolidated activities are recognised in full, whereas activities in which we own minority shareholdings are generally not recognised. Commercial rounding can result in inaccurate sum totals. Changes in the method used to recognise capacity triggered adjustments to some prior-year figures.
Carbon dioxide emissions down 13\%. Our carbon dioxide emissions from electricity generation declined by $13 \%$ to 52.6 million metric tons compared to 2023. The reason for this was the drop in utilisation of the fossil fuels coal and gas. Specific emissions, i.e. the amount of carbon dioxide emitted per megawatt hour of power produced, totalled 0.447 metric tons, slightly down compared to the previous year. In addition to lower generation volumes from coal, the increased deployment of climate-friendly production technologies, i.e. wind and solar, came to bear here. In contrast, the closure of the Emsland nuclear power station eliminated some of our zero-carbon generation.
| $\mathrm{CO}_{2}$ emissions of our power stations Million metric tons |
2023 | 2023 | $+/-$ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Flexible Generation | 14.7 | 18.9 | $-4.2$ |
| of which: | |||
| Germany | 1.9 | 2.2 | $-0.3$ |
| United Kingdom | 6.8 | 10.2 | $-3.4$ |
| Netherlands | 4.9 | 5.5 | $-0.6$ |
| Türkiye | 1.1 | 1.0 | 0.1 |
| Phaseout Technologies | 37.9 | 41.7 | $-3.8$ |
| RWE Group | 52.6 | 60.6 | $-8.0$ |
Further drop in lignite production volume. We procure most of the fuel we need to generate electricity on international trading markets. However, lignite is sourced from proprietary opencast mines in the Rhenish mining area, where we produced an equivalent of 13.0 million metric tons of hard coal units (HCU). This was 1.3 million metric tons of HCU less than in 2023, owing to the decline in electricity generated by our lignite-fired power plants. We used the lion's share of the mined lignite in these stations. The remainder went towards manufacturing refined products and, to a limited extent, to generating process steam and district heat.
Electricity sales slightly down, gas sales unchanged. In fiscal 2024, we sold 155,903 GWh of electricity and 42,316 GWh of gas. These volumes are largely attributable to RWE Supply \& Trading, which markets most of our electricity generation and is responsible for the gas business. Whereas gas sales were unchanged from 2023, electricity deliveries were down $2 \%$. The decline in our generation volumes came to bear here. As a result, we sold less electricity produced in-house on the wholesale market. This was partially offset by increased sales in the supply business with industrial customers, whom we also supply with purchased electricity.
Significant decline in electricity revenue. Our external revenue (excluding natural gas tax/electricity tax) amounted to $€ 24,224$ million, compared to $€ 28,521$ million the year prior. Electricity revenue dropped by $16 \%$ to $€ 21,047$ million - largely due to a decrease in prices. Conversely, gas revenue recorded a slight uptick, advancing to $€ 1,805$ million. Price effects also came to bear here. When calculating revenue in gross terms, i.e. including income from the commercial optimisation of our generation assets, the figure would be $€ 55,959$ million.
At $15 \%$, the share of our coal-related revenues remained largely unchanged compared to the previous year, although we produced much less electricity from coal. This was because we realised higher prices from forward sales of electricity generated by our lignite-fired power stations, which offset the volume effect. We determine the share of coal based on gross revenue, which amounted to $€ 55,959$ million ( $€ 8,119$ million of which from coal). When the share of coal is calculated based on our external revenue of $€ 24,224$ million ( $€ 5,156$ million of which from coal) the figure is $21 \%$.
| External revenue ${ }^{1}$ $€$ million |
2024 | 2023 | $+/-$ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offshore Wind | 1,071 | 1,202 | $-131$ |
| Onshore Wind/Solar | 2,394 | 2,295 | 99 |
| Flexible Generation | 1,092 | 1,235 | $-143$ |
| Supply \& Trading | 18,865 | 22,989 | $-4,124$ |
| Other, consolidation | 2 | - | 2 |
| Core business | 23,424 | 27,721 | $-4,297$ |
| Phaseout Technologies | 800 | 800 | - |
| RWE Group | 24,224 | 28,521 | $-4,297$ |
| of which: | |||
| Electricity revenue | 21,047 | 25,038 | $-3,991$ |
| Gas revenue | 1,805 | 1,750 | 55 |
1 Some prior-year figures restated; see page 40.
At $€ 5.7$ billion, adjusted EBITDA within top half of guided range. Our adjusted earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortisation (adjusted EBITDA) totalled $€ 5,680$ million. This confirmed the forecast we published at our Capital Markets Day on 28 November 2023, which envisaged a range of $€ 5,200$ million to $€ 5,800$ million. In our 2023 Annual Report, which was published on 14 March 2024, we updated the earnings outlook taking particular account of the substantial drop in wholesale prices witnessed in the interim. We expected that adjusted EBITDA would come in at the lower end of the aforementioned range. In fact, we achieved a figure in the upper half of the range, which is in part attributable to our trading performance exceeding expectations.
| Adjusted EBITDA ${ }^{1}$ € million |
2023 | 2023 | $+/-$ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offshore Wind | 1,559 | 1,664 | -105 |
| Onshore Wind/Solar | 1,502 | 1,248 | 254 |
| Flexible Generation | 1,949 | 3,217 | $-1,268$ |
| Supply \& Trading | 679 | 1,578 | -899 |
| Other, consolidation | -9 | 42 | -51 |
| Core business | 5,680 | 7,749 | $-2,069$ |
1 Some prior-year figures restated; see page 40.
Despite the positive business performance, adjusted EBITDA fell for short of the exceptionally high year-earlier figure ( $€ 7,749$ million). This was largely attributable to the fact that earnings contributed by the Flexible Generation and Supply \& Trading segments could not match the unusually high levels seen in 2023, which was to be expected. This was contrasted by a significant improvement in earnings in the Onshore Wind/Solar segment, which was primarily driven by the commissioning of new generation capacity.
We had issued earnings forecasts for the Group's business segments in November 2023 and curbed these expectations in early 2024. The developments unfolded as follows:

Adjusted EBIT declines to €3.6 billion. The RWE Group's adjusted EBIT came to $€ 3,561$ million (previous year: $€ 5,802$ million). In our 2023 Annual Report, we had forecast a figure at the lower end of the range of $€ 3,200$ million to $€ 3,800$ million. Our outperformance here was due to the same factors that benefited adjusted EBITDA. The difference between these two key figures is that operating depreciation and amortisation, which totalled $€ 2,119$ million in 2024 (previous year: $€ 1,947$ million), is included in adjusted EBIT, but not in adjusted EBITDA.
Reconciliation to net income ${ }^{1}$
€ million
Adjusted EBIT
Adjusted financial result
Non-operating result
Income before tax
Taxes on income
Income
of which:
Non-controlling interests
Net income/income attributable to RWE AG shareholders
| 2023 | 2023 | $+/-$ |
|---|---|---|
| 3,561 | 5,802 | $-2,241$ |
| -466 | -495 | 29 |
| 3,248 | $-1,308$ | 4,556 |
| 6,343 | 3,999 | 2,344 |
| -1,054 | $-2,337$ | 1,283 |
| 5,289 | 1,662 | 3,627 |
| 154 | 147 | 7 |
| 5,135 | 1,515 | 3,620 |
1 Some prior-year figures restated; see page 40.
Reconciliation to net income dominated by positive exceptional effects. The reconciliation from adjusted EBIT to net income was characterised by special items not relating to operations, which had a strong positive impact in net terms. The most significant of these related to the non-operating result. We present the development of the reconciliation items hereinafter.
| Adjusted financial result | 3024 | 2023 | $+/-$ |
|---|---|---|---|
| € million | 683 | 695 | $-12$ |
| Adjusted interest income | $-847$ | $-998$ | 151 |
| Adjusted interest expenses | $-164$ | $-303$ | 139 |
| Adjusted net interest | $-424$ | $-465$ | 41 |
| Adjusted interest accretion to non-current provisions | 122 | 273 | $-151$ |
| Adjusted other financial result | $-466$ | $-495$ | 29 |
The adjusted financial result improved by $€ 29$ million to -€466 million. The following items experienced noteworthy changes:
| Non-operating result ${ }^{1}$ € million |
2024 | 2023 | $+/-$ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Adjustments to EBIT | 2,768 | $-1,360$ | 4,128 |
| of which: | |||
| Disposal result | $-3$ | 121 | $-124$ |
| Effects on income from the valuation of derivatives | 2,070 | 1,395 | 675 |
| EBIT from Phaseout Technologies | 1,595 | $-2,422$ | 4,017 |
| Other | $-894$ | $-454$ | $-440$ |
| Adjustments to the financial result | 480 | 52 | 428 |
| Non-operating result | 3,248 | $-1,308$ | 4,556 |
1 Some prior-year figures restated; see page 40.
The non-operating result, in which we recognise material items which are not related to operations or the period being reviewed, amounted to $€ 3,248$ million (previous year: -€1,308 million). Its main components developed as follows:
Adjustments made to EBIT contributed $€ 2,768$ million in earnings (previous year: -€1,360 million). Temporary effects of the valuation of derivatives were the single-largest item, totalling $€ 2,070$ million (previous year: $€ 1,395$ million). Phaseout Technologies posted EBIT amounting to $€ 1,595$ million, which was significantly higher than in 2023 (-€2,422 million). In 2024, the reversal of provisions for impending losses from long-term power purchase agreements played a part, whereas the preceding year was impacted by impairments recognised for lignite-fired power stations and opencast lignite mines. Furthermore, operational earnings in this segment improved. Income reported in the 'other' line item dropped to -€894 million (previous year: -€454 million). One reason for this was that we recognised an impairment for our Dutch power plants due to a more conservative margin projection.
Adjustments to the financial result came to $€ 480$ million (previous year: $€ 52$ million). The fact that the discount rates used to calculate our non-current provisions rose had a positive impact: the resulting reduction in the net present value of the obligations was recognised as a profit.
Income before tax amounted to $€ 6,343$ million (previous year: $€ 3,999$ million). Taxes on income totalled $€ 1,054$ million, which resulted in an effective tax rate of $17 \%$. This figure fell slightly short of the average of $20 \%$, which we established for the medium term taking account of projected income in our markets, local tax rates, and the use of loss carryforwards. The deviation is partially due to IFRS earnings contributions that are not tax-relevant.
Non-controlling interests totalled $€ 154$ million, barely exceeding the year-earlier level ( $€ 147$ million).
Our net income, which reflects income attributable to RWE shareholders, amounted to $€ 5,135$ million. The previous year's figure was $€ 1,515$ million.
| Reconciliation to adjusted net income ${ }^{1}$ $€$ million |
2023 | 2023 | $+/-$ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Income before financial result and taxes | 6,329 | 4,442 | 1,887 |
| Adjustments to EBIT | -2,768 | 1,360 | -4,128 |
| Adjusted EBIT | $\mathbf{3 , 5 6 1}$ | $\mathbf{5 , 8 0 2}$ | $\mathbf{- 2 , 2 4 1}$ |
| Financial result | 14 | -443 | 457 |
| Adjustments to the financial result | -480 | -52 | -428 |
| Taxes on income | -1,054 | -2,337 | 1,283 |
| Adjustments to taxes on income to a tax rate of 20\% | 435 | 1,275 | -840 |
| Non-controlling interests | -154 | -147 | -7 |
| Adjusted net income | $\mathbf{2 , 3 2 2}$ | $\mathbf{4 , 0 9 8}$ | $\mathbf{- 1 , 7 7 6}$ |
1 Some prior-year figures restated; see page 40.
Adjusted net income of $€ 2.3$ billion higher than expected. Coming in at $€ 2,322$ million, adjusted net income was much lower than the unusually high figure recorded in the preceding year ( $€ 4,098$ million). To calculate this key figure, we deducted the non-operating result in the reconciliation and amended the tax rate, in order to align it with the aforementioned budgeted rate of $20 \%$. In our 2023 Annual Report, we had forecast a figure for adjusted net income at the lower end of the range of $€ 1,900$ million to $€ 2,400$ million. We clearly exceeded this guidance, above all thanks to the good operating business performance. In addition, the adjusted financial result was slightly better than expected.
Adjusted net income per share totalled $€ 3.12$, based on 743.6 million shares. The shares purchased up to the balance-sheet date as part of the current share buyback programme were included in this key figure only on a pro-rata basis.
| Capital expenditure on property, plant and equipment and on intangible assets ${ }^{1}$ € million |
2023 | 2023 | $+/-$ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offshore Wind | 3,685 | 1,349 | 2,336 |
| Onshore Wind/Solar | 4,838 | 2,709 | 2,129 |
| Flexible Generation | 515 | 617 | -102 |
| Supply \& Trading | 70 | 151 | -81 |
| Other, consolidation | - | - | - |
| Core business | $\mathbf{9 , 1 0 8}$ | $\mathbf{4 , 8 2 6}$ | $\mathbf{4 , 2 8 2}$ |
| Phaseout Technologies | 269 | 320 | -51 |
| RWE Group | $\mathbf{9 , 3 7 7}$ | $\mathbf{5 , 1 4 6}$ | $\mathbf{4 , 2 3 1}$ |
1 Some prior-year figures restated; see page 40.
| Capital expenditure on financial assets and acquisitions € million |
2023 | 2023 | $+/-$ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offshore Wind | 1,400 | 133 | 1,267 |
| Onshore Wind/Solar | 144 | 4,173 | $-4,029$ |
| Flexible Generation | 6 | 431 | -425 |
| Supply \& Trading | 85 | 95 | -10 |
| Other, consolidation | 228 | - | 228 |
| Core business | $\mathbf{1 , 8 6 3}$ | $\mathbf{4 , 8 3 2}$ | $\mathbf{- 2 , 9 6 9}$ |
| Phaseout Technologies | - | 1 | -1 |
| RWE Group | $\mathbf{1 , 8 6 3}$ | $\mathbf{4 , 8 3 3}$ | $\mathbf{- 2 , 9 7 0}$ |
Investments focus on renewable energy expansion. In the financial year that just ended, capital expenditure amounted to $€ 11,240$ million (previous year: $€ 9,979$ million). This figure only includes cash transactions. The lion's share of the funds was dedicated to the Offshore Wind ( $45 \%$ ) and Onshore Wind/Solar ( $44 \%$ ) segments.
We spent $€ 9,377$ million on property, plant and equipment and intangible assets. As expected, this was much more than in the previous year ( $€ 5,146$ million). A focal point of our investing activity was the construction of new solar and wind farms in the US. Our largest expenditure items in Europe included wind projects in the North Sea, notably the construction of the Sofia (UK, 1,400 MW) and Thor (Denmark, 1,080 MW) wind farms.
At $€ 1,863$ million, our spending on acquisitions and financial assets was significantly lower than the prior year's corresponding figure ( $€ 4,833$ million), which was unusually high due to the takeover of Con Edison Clean Energy Businesses. In the year under review, the majority of the funds was used to acquire three UK offshore wind projects from Swedish energy group Vattenfall.
In the 2024 fiscal year, $94 \%$ of our capital expenditure was taxonomy-aligned (previous year: $89 \%$ ), meaning that it was allocated to projects classified as sustainable according to the EU Taxonomy Regulation. This percentage is based on total investments of $€ 12,017$ million. The deviation from the aforementioned figure ( $€ 11,240$ million) is due to the fact that non-cash transactions are also taxonomy-relevant and additions to assets resulting from associated acquisitions are considered rather than acquisition expenditure.
| Workforce $^{1}$ | 31 Dec 2024 | 31 Dec 2023 | $+/-$ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offshore Wind | 2,733 | 2,388 | 345 |
| Onshore Wind/Solar | 3,806 | 3,392 | 414 |
| Flexible Generation | 3,437 | 3,196 | 241 |
| Supply\& Trading | 2,239 | 1,971 | 268 |
| Other ${ }^{2}$ | 594 | 544 | 50 |
| Core business | 12,809 | 11,491 | 1,318 |
| Phaseout Technologies | 8,176 | 8,644 | $-468$ |
| RWE Group | 20,985 | 20,135 | 850 |
1 Full-time equivalents.
2 This item only comprises employees of the holding company RWE AG.
Headcount up thanks to renewable energy expansion. As of 31 December 2024, the RWE Group had 20,985 people on its payroll, of which 13,505 were based in Germany and 7,480 worked abroad. These figures are full-time equivalents (FTE), meaning that part-time positions are considered on a pro-rata basis. The RWE Group's labour force grew compared to the end of 2023, rising by 850 FTE at the Group level. In the core business, we gained 1,318 FTE, mainly driven by growth in the renewables business. This was contrasted by a decline of 468 FTE in the Phaseout Technologies segment, which was attributable to the fact that some employees accepted partial and early retirement offers made, inter alia, within the context of the German coal and nuclear phaseouts.
These figures do not include apprentices or trainees. At the end of 2024, a total of 707 young people were learning a profession at RWE, just as many as in the previous year.
Companies with ambitious growth targets require a solid financial position. RWE meets this standard. Our financial needs are largely covered by cash flows from operating activities, which totalled $€ 6.6$ billion in 2024. Operational cash inflows ensured that debt was moderate, despite significant investments. Our leverage factor, i.e. the ratio of net debt to adjusted EBITDA, reached 2.0 in the year under review. This is well below the upper threshold of 3.0 we have established for this key figure.
How we procure funds. To implement our growth strategy, we require significant financial resources to be available long term. However at times, we also need liquidity at short notice, for example as collateral for commodity futures. RWE's most important source of financing is our cash flows from operating activities. We are also financed by debt capital and rely on the following tools to this end:
We also issue bonds outside our DIP, such as the two US $\$ 1$ billion bonds we issued in April 2024, which were the first green bonds we placed on the US market. The two subordinated debts (hybrid bonds) in the amount of $€ 282$ million and US $\$ 317$ million, which were placed on the market in 2015, are not covered by the DIP either. A summary with more detailed information on RWE bonds outstanding can be found on the next page.
| Type of bond | Volume / Currency | Issue date | Maturity date | Coupon | German Securities Code |
ISIN Code |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Conventional bond | 1,250 million $€$ | 24 Aug 2022 | 24 Aug 2025 | 2.500\% | A30VMU | X52523390271 |
| Green bond | 1,000 million $€$ | 24 May 2022 | 24 May 2026 | 2.125\% | A30VJE | X52482936247 |
| Green bond | 750 million $€$ | 26 Nov 2021 | 26 Nov 2028 | 0.500\% | A3MP70 | X52412044567 |
| Green bond | 500 million $€$ | 13 Feb 2023 | 13 Feb 2029 | 3.625\% | A30V83 | X52584685031 |
| Green bond | 1,000 million $€$ | 24 May 2022 | 24 May 2030 | 2.750\% | A30VJF | X52482887879 |
| Green bond | 500 million $€$ | 11 Jun 2021 | 11 Jun 2031 | 0.625\% | A3ESVA | X52351092478 |
| Green bond | 500 million $€$ | 10 Jan 2024 | 10 Jan 2032 | 3.625\% | A3826L | X52743711298 |
| Green bond | 600 million $€$ | 26 Nov 2021 | 26 Nov 2033 | 1.000\% | A3MP71 | X52412044641 |
| Green bond | 1,000 million US\$ | 16 Apr 2024 | 16 Apr 2034 | 5.875\% | - | U5749983AA01 |
| Green bond | 500 million $€$ | 13 Feb 2023 | 13 Feb 2035 | 4.125\% | A30V84 | X52584685387 |
| Conventional bond | 12 million $€$ | 26 Oct 2012 | 26 Oct 2037 | 3.500\% | A1PGV8 | X50826313990 |
| Green bond | 1,000 million US\$ | 16 Apr 2024 | 16 Apr 2054 | 6.250\% | - | U5749983A883 |
| Hybrid bond | 282 million $€$ | 21 Apr 2015 | 21 Apr 2075² | 3.500\% | A14KA8 | X51219499032 |
| Hybrid bond | 317 million US\$ | 30 Jul 2015 | 30 Jul 2075² | 6.625\% | A13SHX | X51254119750 |
1 RWE has announced that it will redeem the bond at the first coll date on 21 April 2025.
2 First potential coll date for RWE: 30 March 2026.
| Cash flow statement ${ }^{1}$ € million |
3024 | 2023 | $+/-$ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Funds from operations | 3,209 | 7,891 | $-4,682$ |
| Changes in working capital | 3,411 | $-3,668$ | 7,079 |
| Cash flows from operating activities | 6,620 | 4,223 | 2,397 |
| Cash flows from investing activities | $-9,712$ | $-2,798$ | $-6,914$ |
| Cash flows from financing activities | 1,116 | $-1,557$ | 2,673 |
| Effects of changes in foreign exchange rates and other changes in value on cash and cash equivalents | 149 | 61 | 88 |
| Total net changes in cash and cash equivalents | $-1,827$ | $-71$ | $-1,756$ |
| Cash flows from operating activities | 6,620 | 4,223 | 2,397 |
| Minus capital expenditure | $-11,240$ | $-9,979$ | $-1,261$ |
| Plus proceeds from divestitures and asset disposals | 514 | 1,162 | $-648$ |
| Free cash flow | $-4,106$ | $-4,594$ | 488 |
[^0]On balance, investing activities resulted in cash outflows of €9,712 million, marking a significant rise compared to 2023 (€2,798 million). The jump was driven by a marked increase in capital expenditure on property, plant and equipment and intangible assets. Furthermore, the previous year's figure had benefited from substantially higher inflows from the sale of marketable securities, but was burdened by the acquisition of US company Con Edison Clean Energy Businesses.
Cash flows from financing activities amounted to €1,116 million. Bond issuances between January and April 2024 played an important role in this regard. Additional funds were secured when Abu Dhabi-based energy firm Masdar acquired a $49 \%$ shareholding in our two wind power projects which we plan to deliver on the southern Dogger Bank in the British North Sea. This was counteracted by dividend payments to RWE shareholders and minority shareholders totalling $€ 1,006$ million. In the previous year, financing activities had resulted in cash outflows of $€ 1,557$ million, which were largely attributable to our decision to settle bank debt and commercial paper.
On balance, the aforementioned cash flows from operating, investing and financing activities decreased our cash and cash equivalents by $€ 1,827$ million.
Cash flows from operating activities, minus capital expenditure, plus proceeds from divestments and asset disposals, results in free cash flow. This indicator amounted to -€4,106 million in the year under review (previous year: -€4,594 million).
[^0]: 1 Some prior-year figures restated; see page 40.
| Reconciliation to adjusted cash flow from Phaseout Technologies | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|
| $\epsilon$ million | ||
| Cash flows from operating activities | 6,620 | 4,223 |
| Cash flows from operating activities of the core business | $-5,824$ | $-3,381$ |
| Cash flows from operating activities of Phaseout Technologies | 796 | 842 |
| Net investments of Phaseout Technologies | $-171$ | $-287$ |
| Use of provisions | 3,328 | 3,074 |
| Additions to/reversals of provisions | $-2,385$ | $-2,251$ |
| Other | $-984$ | $-1,261$ |
| Adjusted cash flow from Phaseout Technologies | 584 | 117 |
Phaseout Technologies: adjusted cash flow much higher year on year. Our most important performance indicator for Phaseout Technologies is adjusted cash flow, which is calculated by subtracting net investments from cash flows from operating activities. In addition, we deduct non-recurrent effects from the (cash) utilisation of provisions and add (non-cash) effects from additions to or the release of provisions.
In 2024, the Phaseout Technologies segment posted adjusted cash flow of $€ 584$ million. This figure is at the upper end of the forecast range of $€ 0.3$ billion to $€ 0.6$ billion and significantly higher than the level posted in 2023 ( $€ 117$ million). In the year under review, we achieved unusually high margins on electricity forward sales and the commercial optimisation of power plant dispatch. Proceeds from the sale of properties also had a positive impact. The decommissioning of our last German nuclear power station, Emsland, in April 2023 had a counteractive effect as it stopped contributing to power generation.
Net debt increases to $€ 11.2$ billion. As at 31 December 2024, the RWE Group's net debt totalled $€ 11,177$ million. This was significantly more than the previous year's figure ( $€ 6,587$ million). The main reason for this development was the substantial investments we made. Operating cash flow and proceeds from the sale of a $49 \%$ stake in the Dogger Bank South wind power project both had a debt-reducing effect.
| Net debt $^{1}$ $€$ million |
31 Dec 2024 | 31 Dec 2023 | $+/-$ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cash and cash equivalents | 5,090 | 6,917 | $-1,827$ |
| Marketable securities | 7,241 | 8,114 | $-873$ |
| Other financial assets | 1,903 | 2,529 | $-626$ |
| Financial assets | 14,234 | 17,560 | $-3,326$ |
| Bonds, other notes payable, bank debt, commercial paper | $-13,559$ | $-11,749$ | $-1,810$ |
| Hedging of bond currency risk | 16 | $-2$ | 18 |
| Other financial liabilities | $-5,110$ | $-5,278$ | 168 |
| Minus 50\% of the hybrid capital stated as debt | 304 | 294 | 10 |
| Financial liabilities | $-18,349$ | $-16,735$ | $-1,614$ |
| Net financial debt / net financial assets (incl. correction of hybrid capital) | $-4,115$ | 825 | $-4,940$ |
| Provisions from pensions and similar obligations | $-1,328$ | $-1,324$ | $-4$ |
| Surplus of plan assets over benefit obligations | 613 | 509 | 104 |
| Provisions for nuclear waste management | $-4,981$ | $-5,384$ | 403 |
| Provisions for dismantling wind and solar forms | $-1,366$ | $-1,213$ | $-153$ |
| Net debt | $-11,177$ | $-6,587$ | $-4,590$ |
1 Mining provisions are not included in net debt. The same holds true for the assets which we attribute to them. At present, this includes our $15 \%$ stake in $£ 0 N$ and the outstanding portion of our claim for state compensation for the German lignite phaseout.
Leverage factor of 2.0 well below the cap we set ourselves. One of our key management parameters is the ratio of net debt to adjusted EBITDA (leverage factor). To secure our solid investment-grade rating, we defined an upper limit for this key figure, which currently stands at 3.0. Despite considerable investment activity, this indicator remained well below the ceiling in 2024, reaching 2.0 (previous year: 0.9).
| Group balance sheet (abridged) ${ }^{1}$ | 31 Dec 2024 | 31 Dec 2023 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| € million | \% | € million | \% | |
| Assets | ||||
| Non-current assets | 63,418 | 64.4 | 55,881 | 52.5 |
| of which: | ||||
| Intangible assets | 10,250 | 10.4 | 9,787 | 9.2 |
| Property, plant and equipment | 38,458 | 39.1 | 28,808 | 27.0 |
| Current assets | 35,022 | 35.6 | 50,631 | 47.5 |
| of which: | ||||
| Derivatives, other receivables and other assets | 20,521 | 20.8 | 33,720 | 31.7 |
| Marketable securities | 6,851 | 7.0 | 7,724 | 7.3 |
| Cash equivalents | 5,090 | 5.2 | 6,917 | 6.5 |
| Total | 98,440 | 100.0 | 106,512 | 100.0 |
| Equity and liabilities | ||||
| Equity | 33,623 | 34.2 | 33,604 | 31.5 |
| Non-current liabilities | 37,242 | 37.8 | 39,815 | 37.4 |
| of which: | ||||
| Provisions | 15,690 | 15.9 | 17,431 | 16.4 |
| Financial liabilities | 14,772 | 15.0 | 14,064 | 13.2 |
| Current liabilities | 27,575 | 28.0 | 33,093 | 31.1 |
| of which: | ||||
| Provisions | 6,047 | 6.1 | 6,815 | 6.4 |
| Derivatives and other liabilities | 21,528 | 21.9 | 26,278 | 24.7 |
| Total | 98,440 | 100.0 | 106,512 | 100.0 |
Significantly higher off-balance-sheet obligations from investment orders. Net debt does not include our off-balance-sheet obligations, which largely stem from long-term purchase agreements for commodities. As of the balance-sheet date, our payment obligations from major fuel procurement contracts amounted to $€ 4,198$ million (previous year: $€ 3,913$ million). In relation to electricity procurement, they totalled $€ 5,698$ million (previous year: $€ 5,561$ million). The figures are based on assumptions regarding the prospective development of commodity prices. Our contractual commitments for approved investment orders amounted to $€ 12,150$ million compared to $€ 8,063$ million in the preceding year. Further off-balance-sheet obligations result, inter alia, from liabilities for pension commitments that employees of our former subsidiary innogy had earned at RWE up to innogy's IPO in 2016.
Equity ratio improves to $34 \%$. In the 2024 consolidated financial statements, our balance-sheet total was $€ 98,440$ million compared to $€ 106,512$ million at the close of 2023. This change was largely driven by a decline in commodity derivatives of $€ 13,900$ million on the assets side and $€ 8,151$ million on the equity and liabilities side of the balance sheet. In addition, our marketable securities portfolio decreased, shrinking by $€ 1,217$ million. Conversely, intangible assets and property, plant and equipment grew by $€ 9,650$ million, largely driven by our growth investments in renewable energy. Equity remained essentially unchanged, coming in at $€ 33,623$ million. Its share in the balance sheet total (equity ratio) increased by 2.7 percentage points to $34.2 \%$.
At $€ 1.9$ billion, RWE AG's net profit for the past year rose significantly compared to 2023, having benefitted from notably higher earnings from our subsidiaries RWE Power and RWE Generation. Distributable profit amounted to $€ 929$ million, paving the way for the intended distribution among our shareholders: we plan to propose a dividend of $€ 1.10$ per share for fiscal 2024 to the Annual General Meeting that will take place in April 2025.
| Balance sheet of RWE AG (abridged) $€$ million | 31 Dec 2024 | 31 Dec 2023 | $+/-$ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Assets | |||
| Financial assets | 19,448 | 19,239 | 209 |
| Accounts receivable from affiliated companies | 37,475 | 32,143 | 5,332 |
| Other accounts receivable and other assets | 416 | 526 | $-110$ |
| Marketable securities and cash and cash equivalents | 8,945 | 11,918 | $-2,973$ |
| Total assets | 66,284 | 63,826 | 2,458 |
| Equity and liabilities | |||
| Equity | 13,106 | 12,133 | 973 |
| Provisions | 2,754 | 2,608 | 146 |
| Accounts payable to affiliated companies | 41,620 | 40,589 | 1,031 |
| Other liabilities | 8,804 | 8,496 | 308 |
| Total equity and liabilities | 66,284 | 63,826 | 2,458 |
| Income statement of RWE AG (abridged) $€$ million | 2024 | 2023 | $+/-$ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Income from financial assets | 2,378 | 1,392 | 986 |
| Net interest | $-95$ | $-356$ | 261 |
| Other income and expenses | $-126$ | $-3$ | $-123$ |
| Taxes on income | $-300$ | 252 | $-552$ |
| Net profit | 1,857 | 1,285 | 572 |
| Transfer to other retained earnings | $-928$ | $-541$ | $-387$ |
| Distributable profit | 929 | 744 | 185 |
Financial statements in accordance with German commercial law. RWE AG prepares its financial statements in compliance with the rules set out in the German Commercial Code and the German Stock Corporation Act. The financial statements are submitted to Bundesanzeiger Verlag GmbH, located in Cologne, Germany, which publishes them in the Commercial Register. They can also be downloaded from www.rwe.com/financial-reports. RWE AG's economic situation is largely shaped by its subordinate Group companies. As a result, the presentation of developments within the Group including risks and opportunities is also pertinent to the financial statements for the year under review.
Net worth. As at 31 December 2024, RWE AG recorded $€ 66,284$ million in total assets. This is $€ 2,458$ million higher than the previous year's figure. The increase is largely attributable to the rise in accounts receivable from affiliated companies resulting from an internal Group-wide liquidity balancing. A drop in marketable securities and cash and cash equivalents only partially counteracted this development. On the equity and liabilities side of the balance sheet, we recorded a modest increase in both accounts payable and equity. The latter amounted to $€ 13,106$ million, registering a rise of $€ 973$ million over the previous year's figure. The equity ratio rose by 0.8 percent to $19.8 \%$.
Financial position. RWE AG has a solid economic position with high levels of cash and cash equivalents and a number of financing tools at its disposal that it can use flexibly. Our long-term credit ratings from Moody's (Boa2) and Fitch (BBB+) are classified as investment grade. Last year, both these rating agencies reaffirmed their positive assessments. Detailed information on RWE's financial situation is available on pages 52 et seqq.
Earnings position. RWE AG's earnings position improved compared to 2023. The line items on the income statement developed as follows:
Outlook for 2025. Our current assessment indicates that distributable profit in 2025 will provide the necessary headroom for further dividend growth. However, the number of dividend-bearing shares will decrease due to the ongoing share buyback programme. We intend to propose a dividend payment of $€ 1.20$ per share to our shareholders at next year's Annual General Meeting.
Corporate governance declaration in accordance with Sections 289f and 315d of the German Commercial Code. On 14 February 2025, the Executive Board and the Supervisory Board of RWE AG issued its Corporate Governance Declaration in accordance with Sections 289f and 315d of the German Commercial Code. The declaration has been published at www.rwe.com/corporate-governance-declaration and contains the Corporate Governance Report.
For the current fiscal year, we forecast adjusted EBITDA of $€ 4,550$ million to $€ 5,150$ million and adjusted net income of $€ 1,300$ million to $€ 1,800$ million. Both performance indicators are therefore projected to be lower than last year. We expect to see a decline in margins on electricity forward sales and income from the commercial optimisation of our power plant dispatch. These projections are based on normalised earnings. The commissioning of new wind forms, solar forms and battery storage facilities will have a positive impact. Our net investments remain high, but are not expected to reach the figure seen in 2024.
Measured economic prospects in RWE's core European markets. Global gross domestic product (GDP) is projected to continue growing significantly this year. In its 2024/2025 annual review, the German Council of Economic Experts forecast a 2.6\% boost. The expanding services sector is expected to play an important part, although geopolitical risks and new tariffs could have a negative impact. Growth rates in our core markets are anticipated to average below the global mean. In Germany, GDP might rise by just 0.4\% according to the Council of Economic Experts. Economic and structural pressures, such as energy costs, bureaucracy and infrastructure quality, will come to bear. In the UK, the experts forecast a GDP rise of $1.5 \%$. Growth in the USA is projected to reach $2.1 \%$.
Electricity demand forecast to rise. Our expectations regarding this year's electricity consumption are based on the economic outlook set out above, among other things. Demand for electricity in our core markets is projected to increase on the back of the anticipated economic growth. In some countries, e.g. Germany, the boost may be more moderate, whereas other countries, such as the USA, may see a more dynamic development.
| Forecast $€$ million |
2024 actual | Outlook for 2024 |
|---|---|---|
| Adjusted EBITDA | 5,680 | $4,550-5,150$ |
| of which: | ||
| Offshore Wind | 1,559 | $1,300-1,700$ |
| Onshore Wind/Solar | 1,502 | $1,650-2,150$ |
| Flexible Generation | 1,949 | $1,000-1,400$ |
| Supply \& Trading | 679 | $100-500$ |
| Adjusted EBIT | 3,561 | $2,350-2,950$ |
| Adjusted net income | 2,322 | $1,300-1,800$ |
Outlook for 2025: operating result expected to fall below last year's level. Our central operational earnings indicators for 2025 are projected to be lower than those achieved in 2024. We forecast adjusted EBITDA for the Group to total between $€ 4,550$ million and $€ 5,150$ million (2024: $€ 5,680$ million). Adjusted EBIT should register within a range of $€ 2,350$ million to $€ 2,950$ million (2024: $€ 3,561$ million) with operating depreciation and amortisation at approximately $€ 2,200$ million. We expect adjusted net income of between $€ 1,300$ million and $€ 1,800$ million (2024: $€ 2,322$ million). This corresponds to about $€ 2.10$ per share, provided we reach the midpoint of the guidance and the share buyback programme progresses as planned. These forecasts are based on a normal trading performance. Margins on electricity sales and income from the commercial optimisation of our power plant dispatch should be lower than in 2024. However, the commissioning of new wind forms, solar forms and battery storage facilities is anticipated to have a positive impact. Our estimations are based on the assumption that wind speeds will be at normal levels for the remainder of the year. At our onshore sites, they would therefore be slightly higher than in 2024.
Our outlook broken down by segment is as follows:
Phaseout Technologies: margins on forward sales markedly down. Adjusted cash flow from phaseout technologies, calculated as outlined on page 55, is expected to decline to between -€650 million and - €350 million (2024: €584 million). Although margins on electricity forward sales and income from the commercial optimisation of our power plant dispatch will fall significantly short of the high level posted last year, we expect electricity generation to contribute positively. However, adjusted cash flow is burdened by significant costs from opencast mining.
Net investments likely to be down on 2024. Over the current fiscal year, we will continue to invest heavily in growth projects. However, on a net basis, i.e. less divestments, this capital expenditure is expected to fall short of the level reported in 2024 ( $€ 10$ billion). Our spending will mainly centre on wind, solar and battery projects in Europe and the USA.
Leverage factor probably below the 3.0 cap. Due to our growth investments, our leverage factor, i.e. the ratio of net debt to adjusted EBITDA, is likely to continue to increase. We anticipate that the factor will rise significantly compared to 2024, when it was 2.0. However, we still expect to remain below the 3.0 cap we set ourselves for this indicator.
Dividend for fiscal 2025. The Executive Board of RWE AG envisages a dividend of $€ 1.20$ per share for the 2025 fiscal year. This represents an increase of $€ 0.10$ compared to the dividend proposal for 2024.
Investments in wind and solar farms, energy storage units and power plants are commitments made for decades. Companies like RWE are therefore particularly reliant on stable regulatory conditions. Forecasting how regulatory frameworks, interest rates and energy prices will develop over time is challenging. This is just one of the many uncertainties that shape our business. It requires us to take an anticipatory approach, recognise opportunities, but also counteract risks as they arise. We do so with the help of a professional control and risk management system, on which we will elaborate in this chapter.
RWE's control and risk management system. Our internal control and risk management system provides a solid methodological basis for the early detection, assessment and management of business-related risks. It also helps us identify and leverage opportunities. Our analyses and actions primarily relate to events that impact the success of our business, while also taking sustainability matters of relevance to us into consideration. To ensure our financial reporting is accurate and reliable, we use an accounting-related internal control system (ICS). We also rely on a compliance management system (CMS), designed to ensure adherence to the statutory regulations applicable to RWE and the standards we set for ourselves. More detailed information on the ICS and CMS is presented on pages 69 et seq.
Internal Audit regularly verifies the quality and functionality of our control and risk management system. Such assessments were again carried out in 2024 and gave no reason to doubt the appropriateness and effectiveness of our control and risk management system. The Executive Board of RWE AG confirmed the Group's risk bearing capacity by way of a resolution dated 27 November 2024.1
Distribution of risk management tasks. Responsibility for risk and opportunity management within the Group lies with the parent company RWE AG. Its Executive Board monitors and manages the Group's overall risk. In addition, it determines the general risk appetite of RWE and defines upper limits for single risk positions. At the level below the Executive Board, the Controlling \& Risk Management department is in charge of implementing and constantly refining the risk management system. It derives detailed limits for the individual business fields and operating units from the risk thresholds set by the Executive Board. Its tasks also include checking that the risks have been identified in full and are plausible before aggregating them. In so doing, it receives support from the Risk Management Committee, which is composed of the heads of the five following RWE AG departments: (1) Controlling \& Risk Management (Chair), (2) Finance \& Credit Risk, (3) Accounting, (4) Legal, Compliance \& Insurance, and (5) Strategy \& Sustainability. The Controlling \& Risk Management department provides the Executive Board and the Supervisory Board of RWE AG with regular reports on the company's risk exposure.
A number of additional organisational units have been entrusted with risk management tasks:
Accounting ensures that financial reporting is free of material misstatements. It uses the aforementioned ICS for this purpose. A panel consisting of officers from Accounting and other departments relevant to accounting (ICS Committee) assists in ensuring the quality of our financial reporting.
To prevent violations of laws and other norms, we have established a compliance management system, overseen by the Chief Compliance Officer. We also employ Group compliance officers, who dedicate their time to ensuring Group-wide rules and regulations are implemented uniformly.
Under the expert management of the aforementioned organisational units, RWE AG and its subsidiaries are responsible for identifying risks early, assessing them correctly, and managing them in accordance with corporate standards.
Risk identification and assessment. Risks and opportunities are defined as negative or positive deviations from expected figures. Their management is an integral and continuous part of our operating processes. We assess risks every six months, using a bottom-up analysis. We also monitor risk exposure between the regular survey dates. The Executive Board of RWE AG and the Audit Committee of the Supervisory Board are updated on the Group's risks once a quarter. RWE AG's Chief Financial Officer is immediately notified of any material changes.
Our risk analysis normally covers the three-year horizon of our medium-term plan, but can extend beyond that in individual cases. We measure the potential damage based on the possible effects on net income, liquidity, net debt and equity. The key indicator which is most impacted determines the risk classification, taking hedges into account.
The material risks are presented in a matrix (see next page). They are categorised by potential damage and probability of occurrence. Where possible, we aggregate risks that share the same cause to one single risk. To clearly assign them to the matrix fields, we have established damage potential thresholds, which are oriented towards the RWE Group's ability to bear risks. They are presented in the table below the matrix. Depending on their position in the matrix, we distinguish between low, medium and high risks. Through this systematic risk identification, we determine whether there is a need for action and - if so initiate measures to mitigate the risks.

RWE risk matrix

| Potential damage ${ }^{1}$ | Earnings risks $X=$ potential impact on net income |
Indebtedness/ equity risks $Y=$ potential impact on liquidity, net debt and/or equity |
|---|---|---|
| Category V | $8,000 \times X$ | $8,000 \times Y$ |
| Category IV | $1,500 \times X \times 8,000$ | $4,000 \times Y \times 8,000$ |
| Category III | $600 \times X \times 1,500$ | $2,000 \times Y \times 4,000$ |
| Category II | $300 \times X \times 600$ | $1,000 \times Y \times 2,000$ |
| Category I | $150 \times X \times 300$ | $150 \times Y \times 1,000$ |
[^0]Note from the auditor
| Risk classes | Classification of the highest single risk | |
|---|---|---|
| February 2025 | February 2024 | |
| Market risks | High | High |
| Regulatory and political risks | High | High |
| Legal risks | Low | Low |
| Operational risks | Medium | Medium |
| Financial risks | Medium | Medium |
| Creditworthiness of business partners | Medium | Medium |
| Other risks | Low | Low |
Main risks for RWE. Depending on their causes, our risks can be divided into seven classes, which are shown in the table above. The highest individual risk determines the classification of the risk of the entire risk class. Our classification reflects the situation in February 2025. It is unchanged since last year (see pages 62 et seqq. of the 2023 Annual Report).
We have classified market risks along with regulatory and political risks as 'high', while the other risk classes have been categorised as 'medium' or 'low'. We currently find ourselves exposed to regulatory uncertainties above all in the USA, where the framework for renewable energy may deteriorate (see page 31). Market risks are mainly fuelled by uncertainty over future wholesale electricity, fuel and emission allowance prices. For a large portion of our generation portfolio, realisable margins depend on the level of these quotations.
[^0]: 1 Aggregated over the planning horizon.
In this section, we provide commentary on the main risks and opportunities we have identified for the current fiscal year and the following two years. We will also explain the measures we take to counter the threat of negative developments.
We assess the price risks to which we are exposed on the markets taking account of current forward prices and expected volatility. For our power plants and parts of our renewable energy portfolio, we limit the earnings risks by hedging their output. We also secure the prices of fuel and $\mathrm{CO}_{2}$ emission allowances needed to produce power. In the consolidated financial statements, we present necessary financial instruments, such as those that monitor interest and currency risks, inter alia, through the statement of on-balance-sheet hedges (see pages 206 et seq. and 262 et seqq. in the Notes). However, by selling electricity forward, we run the risk of having to make expensive purchases on the market to fulfil supply commitments in the event of production outages or non-delivery of fuel. In addition, collateralising forward contracts can lead to significant temporary cash outflows. We address these risks when deciding how much power to hedge.
RWE Supply \& Trading plays a central role when it comes to managing commodity price risks. It functions as the Group's interface to the global wholesale markets for energy commodities. On behalf of our generation companies, RWE Supply \& Trading markets large portions of our electricity output and purchases the necessary fuels and $\mathrm{CO}_{2}$ certificates. To a limited extent, in compliance with risk thresholds, the company also takes commodity positions to achieve a trading profit.
Our risk management system for energy trading is aligned with the best practice standards as applied to the trading businesses of banks. Accordingly, we only conclude transactions if the associated risks are within approved limits. Our commodity positions are constantly monitored. Risks from trades conducted by RWE Supply \& Trading for its own account are monitored daily.
The Value at Risk (VaR) is of central importance for risk measurement in trading. It specifies the potential loss from a risk position not exceeded with a given probability over a certain planning horizon. In energy trading, we generally base our VaR figures on a confidence interval of $95 \%$ - with a holding period of one day. This means that, with a probability of $95 \%$, the daily loss will not exceed the VaR. The VaR for the price risks of commodity positions in proprietary trading must adhere to a $€ 60$ million ceiling. In the year under review, the actual daily figures were usually significantly lower. They averaged $€ 13$ million. The daily VaR cap for the management of our gas portfolio and LNG business, which are pooled in a dedicated organisational unit at RWE Supply \& Trading, is set at $€ 40$ million. The actual VaRs for 2024 averaged $€ 6$ million. In addition, limits derived from the VaR thresholds have been set for each individual trading desk. Furthermore, we develop extreme scenarios and factor them into stress tests, determine their consequences for earnings, and take countermeasures if we deem the risks to be too high.
The political framework in the energy sector has become less certain, especially in the USA. The new President, Donald Trump, mandated a comprehensive review of the approval processes for wind power projects, imposed a temporary ban on leasing sites for new offshore projects and introduced additional import duties (see pages 31 et seq.). We foresee a risk that additional measures may follow, preventing us from continuing our renewables expansion as planned. It is conceivable that federal approvals for new build projects could be denied or that tax incentives could deteriorate. Furthermore, additional duties could make importing components more expensive or impossible. In light of these developments, we have opted to significantly curtail expenditure on our offshore projects in the USA for the time being. If it became clear that delivering these projects was no longer feasible, we would have to recognise impairment losses on the capitalised development and investment costs. To limit our exposure to risks arising from tariffs and other trade barriers, we carefully evaluate the countries from which we procure supplies, while increasingly seeking local sources.
In Germany, it remains to be seen what policy decisions the new government will reach in the energy sector. As the election of the Lower House of Parliament was held just before this report was completed, we cannot make a reliable assessment of the situation at this time. We believe it is unlikely that Germany will steer its energy policy in an entirely new direction. We see an urgent need for action regarding the regulatory framework for investments in new gas-fired power plants. These are required to maintain security of supply in view of the planned coal phaseout. New support mechanisms may have a significant impact on our investing activity.
A change in government can create new opportunities, as seen in the UK for example. The new Labour administration has set ambitious goals to expand renewables, upped the budgets for CfD auctions, and lifted the de facto ban on new onshore wind farms. With this and further measures, the government seeks to make UK power supply essentially carbon neutral as early as 2030. For RWE, these changes open up new avenues of investment.
Our agreement with the federal government and the state of North Rhine-Westphalia to bring forward our exit from lignite has provided a stable regulatory framework. At the end of 2023, the European Commission approved $€ 2.6$ billion in compensation, to which we are legally and contractually entitled for the lignite phaseout. Since then we have already received payments totalling $€ 1.0$ billion. An action has been brought against the EU's decision, though we believe it has little chance of succeeding.
In a suit filed in the Netherlands, the Dutch government has resolved to pay us compensation. The total has been set at $€ 332$ million and will be recognised for a statutory limitation on electricity generation from hard coal in the first half of 2022, which was abolished early due to the Ukraine crisis. Brussels is yet to grant approval. The entitlement to compensation was recognised as a contingent receivable in the Group's 2023 financial statements and therefore has not yet had an impact on earnings.
The possible introduction of a general tariff on electricity feed-ins into the public grid is another risk we are exposed to in the Netherlands. The consumer and market supervisory authority ACM is considering this move. It states the reason as being increased grid costs due to the expansion of renewables, which should also be borne by the generation companies. If the plans are put into action, this would result in an additional financial burden.
In the UK, there is a possibility that the renewables support scheme based on green electricity certificates could be adjusted. These Renewables Obligation Certificates (ROCs) are awarded to operators free of charge. The operators then sell them on to electricity suppliers, who have a legal requirement to present a certain number of ROCs to the market authority depending on their supply volumes. The British government is considering changing the ROC price formation mechanism, which could lead to earnings losses for us. However, operators of new plants have been supported by CFDs rather than ROCs since 2017, meaning that any potential changes would only impact older generation assets.
In energy trading, we see a risk of stricter regulatory hurdles that limit the scope for transactions or give rise to additional costs. If economic sanctions are introduced, it may become impossible to continue fulfilling existing contracts. This can curtail earnings considerably, while increasing the risk of litigation.
Stricter legal or regulatory requirements regarding the dismantling of decommissioned nuclear power stations and recultivation of opencast mines can lead to higher expenditure. To a limited extent, there is also potential to make better progress than expected and to achieve cost savings as a result of new regulations.
There are risks within the present regulatory framework, for instance in relation to approvals for constructing and operating production facilities. The danger here is that approvals are granted late or not at all and that granted approvals are withdrawn temporarily or permanently. Furthermore, delays in the transfer of land that has been assigned to us for lignite mining are also possible.
Utilisation of our wind and solar farms depends on weather conditions. Longer periods of low wind, cloud cover or darkness can cause generation volumes and revenue in individual years to remain below estimates. We minimise the impact of weather conditions on Group earnings through the geographical diversification of our green assets. This increases the chance of less favourable developments at one location partially being offset by more favourable meteorological conditions at another. We also benefit from operating our flexible power plants, as market conditions for these assets tend to improve during periods when wind and solar power feed-ins are low.
When making investment decisions, we take care to ensure that our return requirements are satisfied. However, there is a chance that actual project earnings deviate from our forecasts, for instance if component prices and interest rates rise. Additional costs can also result from withdrawals of project partners and delays, for example due to lengthy approval procedures, logistical bottlenecks, delayed or inadequate supplier performance, and supply chain interruptions caused by international trade conflicts. On the revenue side, there is a risk that actual electricity market prices or state-guaranteed payments may fall short of expectations. We prepare our investment decisions diligently. We lean on comprehensive analyses to portray the financial impact of these projects as realistically as possible, whilst also taking alternative scenarios and their consequences into account. RWE has differentiated responsibility regulations and approval channels, which must be observed when preparing and actioning investment decisions. Furthermore, when implementing projects, we see to it that envisaged timelines and budgets are adhered to.
Our business processes are supported by secure data processing systems. However, cyber attacks are always possible. If these attacks prove successful, they can curtail the functioning of our systems and jeopardise confidentiality, integrity and availability of data. We limit this risk with high security standards and obligatory Group-wide cyber security training programmes. In addition, we regularly invest in hardware and software upgrades as well as the optimisation of our processes.
Changes in interest rates give rise to risks and opportunities in several respects. Market interest rates, for example, can impact our provisions, as they are the point of reference for the discount rates used for determining the net present values of obligations. This means that, all other things being equal, provisions decrease when market interest rates rise and increase when market interest rates fall. On pages 246 et seqq. of the Notes, we present the effects of changes in interest rates on the net present values of our pension obligations and on nuclear and mining provisions.
Financing costs rise and fall in line with interest rates. We measure the possible impact using the Cash Flow at Risk (CFaR), applying a confidence level of $95 \%$ and a holding period of one year. Our average CFaR in 2024 was $€ 32$ million.
Rises in market interest rates can lead to reductions in the prices of the securities we hold and vice versa. This primarily relates to fixed-interest bonds. We measure this interdependency using sensitivity analyses. As of the balance-sheet date, an increase in market interest rates of 100 basis points would have lowered the value of the bonds on our books by $€ 20$ million.
Price fluctuations in share portfolios also present both risks and opportunities. This largely relates to our $15 \%$ stake in E.ON, which had a fair value of $€ 4.5$ billion at the end of 2024 .
Security price fluctuations not only have an impact on RWE's financial assets, but also on our pension funds. In the event of unfavourable capital market developments, we might have to increase our pension provisions in order to compensate for our fund assets losing value. Conversely, favourable developments would allow us to reduce these provisions.
We control risks and opportunities from changes in the price of securities with a professional fund management system. When concluding financial transactions, range of action, responsibilities and controls are set out in internal guidelines which the Group companies are obliged to adhere to. All financial transactions are recorded using special software and are monitored by RWE AG.
Foreign exchange risks are also centrally managed by RWE AG. We aggregate foreign currency payments made and received across all Group companies to net financial positions for each currency and hedge the latter largely using derivatives.
General price fluctuations also pose risks. Operating costs can rise unexpectedly during times of high inflation and rapidly increasing salaries. We would then have to consider an upward adjustment to provisions for pensions, recultivating opencast mines, dismantling generation assets, or other commitments. We are also exposed to inflationary risks due to our investment activities. If project costs increase without a corresponding rise in revenue, a loss of margins can occur. Conversely, there is a chance that investments could become more attractive if inflation falls.
Sureties pledged for forward transactions also harbour a risk. Their value depends on the extent to which the contractually agreed prices deviate from market quotations as of the respective cut-off date. Substantial differences in collateral may weigh heavily on our liquidity. Thanks to our robust financial position and use of financing instruments at our disposal, we have always been able to provide the required funds so far.
Failure to implement or delays in planned divestments, along with sales proceeds falling short of expectations, represent an additional financial risk. Our growth strategy envisages that we partially finance investments through proceeds from divestments. Without sufficient funds, we may be forced to abandon promising projects due to financial constraints.
The conditions at which we finance our debt capital are in part reliant on the credit ratings we receive from independent rating agencies. Moody's and Fitch classify our creditworthiness in the investment grade category. If our rating deteriorates, raising debt capital could become more expensive. The liquidity requirement when pledging collateral for forward transactions would also increase.
Rating agencies, banks and capital investors base their assessment of our creditworthiness on the ratio of net debt to adjusted EBITDA (leverage factor), among other things. We capped the leverage factor at 3.0 and are optimistic that we will be able to adhere to this limit. However, we cannot rule out the possibility that we may temporarily exceed it, for example if significant collateral is needed for derivative contracts.
In the trading and financing business, credit risks and limit utilisation are measured daily. Most of our over-the-counter trading transactions are subject to industry-standard framework agreements, with sureties specified as an appendix to the contract.
RWE's risks and opportunities - general assessment by management. We consider changes to the regulatory context and market conditions to harbour our greatest risks and opportunities. As previously explained, individual core markets could see changes to energy and climate policy, which could positively or negatively impact our investment activities. In the USA, there is an imminent risk that the regulatory environment for wind power may worsen. Continued weak economic growth in Europe, a drop in fuel prices and a corresponding decline in wholesale electricity prices continue to be RWE's greatest market risk. This would weigh on the margins of a portion of our generation portfolio. However, the economy could also recover and drive up wholesale electricity prices.
By continuing to expand renewables, we aim to make our business more sustainable and robust. However, our growth investments are by nature associated with risks and opportunities. Project costs could rise or revenue could fall short of expectations at the time the investment decision is made. Positive deviations from forecasts are also possible. A key condition for the expansion of renewables is functional international supply chains. If cross-border trade is limited, it may prove impossible to deliver certain projects. There is also a risk that divestments, which are intended to help finance our growth, may not materialise or may fail to generate the anticipated funds. As a result, we may be forced to delay or cancel lucrative projects.
Despite the risks highlighted in the present report, there are no identifiable developments that jeopardise the continued operation of RWE AG or the RWE Group. Thanks to the measures we take to safeguard our financial and earning power over the long term and our comprehensive controlling and risk management system, we are confident that we can manage all emerging risks. At the same time, we are establishing the prerequisites for ensuring this remains the case in the future.
Accounting-related internal control system - statements in accordance with Sec. 289, Para. 4, and Sec. 315, Para. 4 of the German Commercial Code. Financial reporting is exposed to the risk of misrepresentations that could have a significant influence on the decisions made by their addressees. This may cause capital investors to invest in a company based on incorrect assumptions. Capital market regulations and RWE's Code of Conduct require that we inform the public of our business performance and important company-specific events completely, objectively, accurately, clearly and in a timely manner. We use a series of tools to meet this ambition. Examples of this are our IFRS accounting policies and the high minimum standards for the IT systems used to record and process accounting-related data. Furthermore, we use an accounting-related internal control system (ICS) for quality assurance purposes. The ICS aims to prevent potential errors and misrepresentations that result from non-compliance with accounting standards.
The Accounting department of RWE AG is responsible for designing the ICS and reviewing its effectiveness. In doing so, it applies Group-wide rules. In addition, it receives assistance from the ICS Committee, which ensures that the internal control system is applied throughout the Group following uniform principles and meets high ambitions in terms of correctness and transparency. The Committee consists of representatives from the Accounting, Controlling\&Risk Management and Internal Audit\&Security departments, along with officers from functions which are closely related to accounting: human resources, procurement, trading, finance, tax and IT.
We subject the ICS to a comprehensive review every year. First, we examine whether the risk situation is presented appropriately and whether suitable controls are in place for the identified risks. Then, we test the effectiveness of the controls. ICS reviews that pertain to accounting-related processes, for example to the preparation of financial statements or to consolidation matters, are conducted by the Accounting department. When it comes to processes handled by service centres on our behalf, for example invoice processing, an auditor certifies the appropriateness and effectiveness of the controls. The representatives of the finance, human resources, procurement, trading and IT functions document whether the agreed ICS quality standards are adhered to by their respective areas. Our Internal Audit\&Security department provides assistance for the ICS reviews. The results of the reviews are documented in a report to the Executive Board of RWE AG. The most recent review was conducted in 2024 and found no issues that would lead us to question the efficacy of the ICS. ${ }^{1}$
Within the scope of external reporting, the members of the Executive Board of RWE AG take an oath for the first-half-year and full-year balance-sheet, confirming that the prescribed accounting standards have been adhered to and that the financial statements give a true and fair view of the net worth, financial position and earnings. When in session, the Supervisory Board's Audit Committee regularly concerns itself with the effectiveness of the ICS. Once a year, the Executive Board of RWE AG submits a report on this to the Committee.
Notes on the compliance management system. The RWE Group operates a compliance management system (CMS), which is designed to ensure observance of legal provisions and compliance with company-specific guidelines and requirements. The purpose of the CMS is to enshrine compliance as a core value, ingraining it in the mindset and actions of our staff and thereby avoiding potential misconduct. We pay particular attention to identifying and avoiding the risk of corruption. Our catalogue of measures comprises consultations on individual cases and training courses. We regularly carry out compliancerelated risk analyses. Our employees can also use a whistleblower system - where they can choose to remain anonymous - to notify compliance officers if they witness violations or activity that could damage the business. More information on the CMS is available on page 155 .
The following disclosures are in accordance with sections $315 a$ and $289 a$ of the German Commercial Code as well as with Section 176, Paragraph 1, Sentence 1 of the German Stock Corporation Act. They relate to company-specific regulations, for example regarding adjustments to the capital structure by the Executive Board or a change of control of the company. At RWE, these provisions are in line with the standards of German listed companies.
Subscribed capital. On 31 December 2024, RWE AG's capital stock amounted to $€ 1,904,233,515.52$, divided among $743,841,217$ no-par-value bearer shares.
Limitation of voting rights and of share transfers by executives and employees. One share grants one vote at the Annual General Meeting and determines the proportion of the company's profit to which the shareholder is entitled. This does not apply to RWE AG's treasury stock, which does not confer any rights to the company. Voting rights are excluded by law in cases where Section 136 of the German Stock Corporation Act applies.
Shares that the company issues within the scope of an employee share plan are generally subject to a restriction on disposal. Usually, the shares may only be sold after a set period. RWE shares that are acquired by Executive Board members as part of their contractual investment obligation are also subject to minimum holding periods.
Shares in capital accounting for more than $10 \%$ of voting rights and special rights with control powers. As of 31 December 2024, no holding in RWE AG exceeded 10\% of the voting rights. There are no RWE shares with special rights that confer control powers.
Appointment and dismissal of Executive Board members / amendments to the Articles of Incorporation. Members of the Executive Board are appointed and dismissed in accordance with Sections 84 et seq. of the German Stock Corporation Act in conjunction with Section 31 of the German Co-Determination Act. Amendments to the Articles of Incorporation are made pursuant to Sections 179 et seqq. of the German Stock Corporation Act in conjunction with Article 16, Paragraph 5 of the Articles of Incorporation of RWE AG. According to the aforementioned provision in the Articles of Incorporation, unless otherwise required by law or the Articles of Incorporation, the Annual General Meeting shall adopt all resolutions by a simple majority of the votes cast or - if a capital majority is required - by the simple majority of the capital stock represented when the resolution is passed. Pursuant to Article 10, Paragraph 9 of the Articles of Incorporation, the Supervisory Board is authorised to pass resolutions in favour of amendments to the Articles of Incorporation that only concern formal matters, without having a material impact on the content.
Executive Board authorisation to implement issuances and buybacks of RWE shares. The Annual General Meeting on 4 May 2023 authorised the Executive Board until 3 May 2028, subject to Supervisory Board approval, to issue bearer or registered convertible and / or option bonds in a total nominal amount of up to $€ 5.5$ billion with or without a limited tenor and to grant the creditors or holders of such bonds convertible or option rights to shares in the company. The Annual General Meeting conditionally increased the capital stock by up to $€ 190,423,349.76$ (conditional capital), divided into up to $74,384,121$ bearer shares, in order for the holders of convertible or option rights to be issued shares in the company.
The Executive Board was also authorised by the Annual General Meeting of 4 May 2023 to increase the company's capital stock, subject to the approval of the Supervisory Board, by up to $€ 380,846,702.08$ through the issuance of up to 148,768,243 shares (authorised capital). The authorisation is effective until 3 May 2028.
New shares from authorised capital and the aforementioned bonds may be issued in exchange for contributions in cash or in kind. These shares or bonds must generally be tendered to the shareholders for subscription. However, the Executive Board is authorised, subject to Supervisory Board approval, to waive subscription rights in the following cases:
In sum, shares issued with a waiver of subscription rights from authorised capital or in connection with convertible or option bonds may not exceed $10 \%$ of the capital stock. The aforementioned upper limit is defined by the amount of capital stock at the time the resolution providing the authorisation was adopted or when the authorisation is exercised, if the capital stock is lower at that time. Other measures taken waiving subscription rights count towards the upper limit.
The Annual General Meeting of 4 May 2023 also authorised the Executive Board of RWE AG, subject to Supervisory Board approval, to purchase shares in the company accounting for up to $10 \%$ of the capital stock when the resolution was passed or when the authorisation is exercised, if the latter is lower. At the Executive Board's discretion, the
purchase can be made on the stock exchange or via a public offer. Shares acquired in this manner may be used for all purposes described in the authorisation. Shareholder subscription rights may be waived depending on the purpose for which the shares are used. The authorisation expires on 3 May 2025.
Effects of a change of control on financing instruments. Our debt financing instruments often contain clauses that take effect in the event of a change of control. Such provisions are in place, for example for our $€ 10$ billion in syndicated credit lines, requiring drawings to be suspended until further notice in the event of a change of control or majority shareholding in RWE AG. The lenders shall enter into negotiations with us on a continuation of the respective credit line. The time limit for doing this is 30 days from the notification of the change of control. On expiry of the time limit, lenders who are not satisfied with the outcome of the negotiations may revoke their loan commitment or cancel the loan if it has already been paid out, and request immediate repayment.
The RWE bonds that we have placed publicly since 2021 are also subject to change-ofcontrol clauses. In the event that a change of control is announced or implemented, investors may request that their bonds be redeemed by a certain deadline, if RWE's long-term credit rating falls below investment grade due to the change of control or if the rating agencies stop issuing us a credit rating. A similar rule applies to a senior bond which matures in 2037: it could not be fully transferred to our subsidiary innogy in 2016, and this company was subsequently acquired by E.ON. A small portion of the bond therefore remains on our books.
In the event of a change of control, we can redeem our two subordinated hybrid bonds with volumes of $€ 282$ million and US $\$ 317$ million within the determined change-ofcontrol period. If they are not redeemed and our long-term credit rating falls below investment grade or credit ratings are no longer issued, their annual yield rises by 500 basis points.
Compensation agreement with the Executive Board and employees in the event of a takeover offer. The current version of the German Corporate Governance Code dated 28 April 2022 recommends that no commitments to additional benefits be made in the event that Executive Board members terminate their employment contract early due to a change of control. We fully adhere to this principle, meaning that we have not included clauses envisaging a special right of termination or rights to severance subject to a change of control in any of the current employment contracts of the members of the Executive Board of RWE AG.
Share-based compensation for Executive Board members and executives according to the company's Long Term Incentive Plan is subject to the following provisions: in the event of a change of control, RWE will pay out all the performance shares that have been finally granted, but have not been paid out yet on expiry of the holding period. Performance shares that have been granted on a preliminary basis at the time of a change of control are valued based on the degree to which the targets have been achieved up to that point in time. Performance shares granted on a preliminary basis in the year of the change of control lapse. They are replaced by a new plan of equal value for the Executive Board members and executives for the fiscal year in which the change of control occurs and the following years.
As evidenced by our contribution to the energy transition and our pursuit of carbonneutral power production, sustainability is a key element of our strategy. True to our purpose 'Our energy for a sustainable life', we seek to create added value for society, municipalities, employees, shareholders and other stakeholders.
This combined non-financial statement for the RWE Group and RWE AG is prepared in accordance with Section 315c in conjunction with Sections 289c to 289e of the German Commercial Code (HGB) and the European Sustainability Reporting Standards (ESRS) issued by the European Commission to implement the Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (EU) 2022/2464 (CSRD) and is referred to hereinafter as the Group Sustainability Statement.
The Group Sustainability Statement was prepared under full application of ESRS. It includes the required disclosures pursuant to Sections 289b to 289e of the German Commercial Code (HGB) for RWE AG as the parent company. This Group Sustainability Statement contains mandatory disclosures and information classified as material based on the results of the double materiality assessment (DMA).
The concepts and approaches considered in this Group Sustainability Statement apply equally to RWE AG, which is obligated to prepare a separate report.
Aspects required by currently applicable statutory regulations are listed in the following table.
For improved legibility, mandatory tables that are not conducive to reading flow and are not helpful when it comes to putting the information into context can be found at the end of the Group Sustainability Statement. When describing our business model and the value chain with regard to sustainability, we do not consider energy trading as a separate segment, as is the case elsewhere in the Annual Report. Instead, we assess it within the context of the upstream and downstream value chain. This applies for each of our operating business activities in the Offshore and Onshore Wind/Solar (jointly referred to as Renewables), Flexible Generation and Phaseout Technologies segments.
All our operating and affiliated companies comply with the legal systems in which they are active, applicable laws, regulations and mandatory industry standards.
This Sustainability Statement for the fiscal year from 1 January 2024 to 31 December 2024 is the first sustainability statement published by RWE that has been prepared in accordance with ESRS. To ease the first-time application of ESRS, RWE has used the transitional provision option under Section 7.1 'Presenting comparative information' in the first year of preparation of the statement in compliance with ESRS and presents comparative information in this first year only where required.
This Sustainability Statement has been prepared on a consolidated basis and includes all consolidated companies of the RWE Group in line with the scope of the consolidated financial statements. Unless otherwise indicated, quantitative disclosures pertain to this basis of consolidation.
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | RWE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| To our investors | Combined management report Group Sustainability Statement | Consolidated financial statements | Notes from the auditor | Responsibility statement | Further information | Annual Report 2024 |
For certain environmental matters (E1 Climate change, E4 Biodiversity and ecosystems), ESRS refer to the concept of 'operational control'. Accordingly, locations, plants or units outside of the financial control scope are also included. In these cases, according to the impacts, risks and opportunities (IRO), RWE must consider the entire activity as an 'own activity' and account for the associated emissions under E1 or sites under E4.
RWE has screened all non-consolidated subsidiaries, joint ventures, joint operations, associates and contractual instruments such as leasing contracts and power purchase agreements with regard to operational control by RWE. If relevant, we considered nonconsolidated subsidiaries as well as sites and assets from contractual arrangements under the operational control of RWE in the two covered topics and in particular in the corresponding key figures (see E1 Climate change - greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and E4 Biodiversity and ecosystems).
Upstream and downstream aspects of the value chain are primarily included in E1 Climate change, E4 Biodiversity and ecosystems, E5 Resource use and circular economy, and S2 Workers in the value chain, and are mainly considered in these sections.
| Required aspects under Sections 289 and 315 of the German Commercial Code | Assignment to ESRS topics |
|---|---|
| Environmental matters | E1 Climate change, E4 Biodiversity, E5 Circular economy |
| Employee matters | S1 Own workforce |
| Social matters | See 'Social matters', not identified as a material topic, concept in place |
| Respect for human rights | S1 Own workforce and S2 Workers in the value chain |
| Combatting corruption and bribery | See 'Combating corruption and bribery'; due to implemented management systems not identified as a material topic, concept in place |
Social matters were not identified as a material topic in our double materiality assessment. Nevertheless, RWE is dedicated to the local communities in which we operate. RWE has published a policy statement on community engagement. We place great importance on open dialogue and thus interact with numerous stakeholders on a daily basis. We consider their interests to ensure that their views can be factored into our goals and plans - from project planning and execution through to operation. Operating companies manage their own contacts with local municipalities and communities, paying due regard to national regulations and local requirements. This allows us to cater to local needs and expectations.
There is no general indicator that makes it possible to measure progress in local engagement. We also ensure that we involve local residents early on and, if possible, we enable them to participate in the value created by our assets in a range of ways, for example by providing funding to support local projects in the respective communities.
Compliance and ethics are core principles that guide our business activities. They help us prevent corruption and bribery and serve as the foundation for our collaborations with suppliers and partners.
All of our business activities and decisions meet pre-established compliance requirements. We do not tolerate compliance infractions of any kind. To avoid bribery and corruption, we established a Compliance Management System (CMS) for the RWE Group.
The main objective of the CMS is to permanently ingrain compliant behaviour in the mindset and actions of all staff members and to consistently strengthen compliance culture within the Group. In our Code of Conduct, which is binding for all employees, we have also listed overarching targets and principles on integrity and observing the law.
The reporting period extends from 1 January 2024 to 31 December 2024, in line with the financial reporting period. Some indicators (e.g. headcount) relate to a specific day and thus refer to 31 December 2024. In certain cases (e.g. employee fluctuation), the average of the figures for each quarterly cut-off date is used.
The following definitions of time horizons were used when preparing the Sustainability Statement:
These time horizons for sustainability reporting intentionally deviate from ESRS 1.80 for the purpose of alignment with the definitions in RWE's financial reporting and planning processes for the short-, medium-, and long-term.
RWE uses estimates, assumptions and judgements for the reporting of certain data points where, despite reasonable efforts, reliable data cannot be obtained or cannot be obtained with reasonable effort or in a timely manner. RWE regularly reassesses the estimates used.
RWE uses specific factors derived from exemplary primary data relating mainly to largescale renewable energy assets for Scope 3.1 and 3.2 emissions arising from purchased goods and services as well as capital goods. For general procured goods and services, RWE still uses average factors as specific consumption-based or supplier specific data is not available and there are no applicable statutory regulations or standards for the supply chain. Due to the use of primary data on the one hand and average data on the other, we classify the total degree of uncertainty as 'medium'.
For Scope 3.7 - Employee commuting, RWE uses statistical averages per country and an average remote working rate due to the unreasonable effort involved in collecting actual data and the lack of materiality for this category compared to total greenhouse gas emissions. We classify the overall uncertainty level for this category as 'low'.
Due to the unavailability of specific consumption and supplier data regarding purchased goods, our metrics for material resource inflows (E5 - Circular economy) are also subject to measurement uncertainty. To estimate material resource inflows, i.e. for components of assets in the Renewables and Flexible Generation business areas, we use exemplary primary data. For all other material resource inflows, we base our estimates on averages. Accordingly, we classify the total degree of uncertainty as 'medium'. Transnational statistical averages for the three to four relevant materials were used to estimate recycling ratios. Accordingly, we classify the overall measurement uncertainty as 'high'.
We have not identified any categories with a high measurement uncertainty - and thus earnings uncertainty - for our own operations.
RWE is a driver of the energy transition and has aligned its business model accordingly. With our Growing Green growth and investment strategy, we are investing in renewable energy, storage solutions, hydrogen technology and flexible generation. RWE's purpose 'Our energy for a sustainable life' underlines our commitment to sustainability as a guiding principle of our actions.
The energy transition is paving the way to a climate-friendly, reliable and affordable energy supply. RWE is making an important contribution to this cause (see pages 21 et seqq.). In the coming years, RWE plans to invest billions in wind energy, photovoltaics, battery storage, hydrogen-capable gas power stations and electrolysis facilities. Concurrently, RWE intends to phase out coal-fired power production in a socially acceptable manner by 2030. The lion's share of the capital expenditure is earmarked for sustainable measures. RWE has committed to bringing $95 \%$ of its capital expenditure in line with the Taxonomy Regulation (EU) 2020 / 852 and to making a major contribution to achieving the climate goals by 2030 (see page 101).
We are advancing the energy transition. At the same time, we want to keep making progress and improvements on sustainability topics such as biodiversity, the circular economy, and occupational health and safety. This applies equally to the employees of partner companies at our locations.
These measures make an important contribution to achieving our net-zero goal by no later than 2040. To supplement them, we are stepping up our efforts to research and measure biodiversity and want our new assets to have a positive net effect on biodiversity from 2030 onwards. We will continue to leverage our substantial expertise and excellent best practices in the field of recultivation. Resource and material availability is a fundamental prerequisite for our ongoing business and the implementation of our strategy. This is why the circular economy is of strategic importance to us.
Our employees are essential to our entrepreneurial success. Our principle 'Every accident is one too many' reflects the priority we give occupational health and safety in general and accident prevention in particular in this context - for the benefit of our own workforce and the employees of our partner companies.
RWE's main product is electricity. We generate electricity from various energy sources. Our activities primarily encompass the generation and storage of electricity and the operation of associated assets. We distinguish between the business areas Renewables, Flexible Generation and Phaseout Technologies. Together with the associated upstream and downstream areas, they form our major value chains, which are described in the following.
RWE's activities in all three areas principally consist of producing electricity as well as developing, building, operating and maintaining the required assets and facilities. Its own operations also include extracting lignite and refining lignite (to marketable products such as briquettes and lignite dust).
RWE's core competency in energy trading is the proprietary trading of electricity, fuel and other energy-related commodities. Above and beyond this, it also covers marketing the Group's electricity generation and procuring the fuel and $\mathrm{CO}_{2}$ certificates required to do so on wholesale energy markets. In addition, RWE operates an active risk management system for commodity price risks within its asset and investment portfolio on global commodity markets. In addition, RWE supplies electricity, gas and other energy services to a limited number of key accounts in industry while doubling as a provider of system services such as balancing and reactive power for transmission system operators. When describing our business model and the value chain in relation to sustainability, we do not consider energy trading as an isolated segment as we do in the other parts of the Annual Report, but instead as an element of the upstream and downstream value chain for each of our operating business activities in the Offshore Wind and Onshore Wind / Solar segments (jointly referred to as Renewables) and the Flexible Generation and Phaseout Technologies segments.
We develop and build offshore and onshore wind farms as well as solar farms to generate electricity from renewable energy. Added to these are battery storage systems. We operate these assets, which also involves maintenance and repair work. Our key markets are in Europe - primarily Germany and the United Kingdom - as well as the USA. Our focus in the Asia-Pacific region rests on Australia, Japan and South Korea. On reaching the end of their service life, the assets are dismantled and their surroundings are restored.
A large number of components and a substantial amount of material is required to construct assets to generate electricity from renewable energy. Therefore, our upstream value chain encompasses the mining, extraction and processing of commodities as well as the manufacture of components such as wind turbines, solar modules and battery storage units. This is handled by partner companies and suppliers. Above and beyond this, our renewable energy value chain also includes services related to planning, building and repowering assets. Partner companies are involved in dismantling assets and restoring used land.
More information on securing the renewable energy supply chain can be found on page 161.
The object of RWE's flexible electricity generation is to supplement power production from renewable energy with flexible generation and secured capacity. The key markets are Europe - primarily Germany, the United Kingdom and the Netherlands. The activities in this area encompass electricity generation from renewables such as hydro and biomass, energy storage in battery storage systems and pumped-storage power stations as well as hydrogen production in the first electrolysers - mainly in Germany and the Netherlands. Power production from gas and biomass and, to a smaller and declining extent, from hard coal in the Netherlands is also part of our scope of activity in this area. In the long run, RWE plans to gradually replace gas and coal-fired stations or retrofit them to run based on low-emissions technologies, for example by replacing gas with hydrogen or through carbon capture and storage.
In addition to operation and maintenance, we develop and build power plants, electrolysers and battery storage systems.
On reaching the end of their service life, assets are dismantled and landscapes are restored.
In the upstream value chain, suppliers must gain access to the necessary commodities. These efforts encompass the exploration and production, for example of gas, biomass and hard coal. Manufacturing components for the maintenance and construction of hydrogen facilities, power stations and storage units also require commodities. Partner companies and suppliers manufacture components, for example for new electrolysers and battery storage systems, and support RWE during the construction and conversion of power plants. Contractors - mainly from Germany, the United Kingdom, the Netherlands and other EU member states - provide construction, operation and maintenance services. Other partner companies are involved in dismantling assets and restoring reclaimed land.
RWE pools electricity generation from lignite and the dismantling of nuclear power stations in Germany in its phaseout technologies business.
Here, our own operations include the operation of opencast mines for extracting lignite, the transportation of lignite to power plants and refining facilities, the operation of power stations to generate electricity, and the refinement of lignite. Maintenance activities in power plants, opencast mines and assets required to perform this work are also subsumed under this business area. Upon conclusion of operations, the power plants, factories and opencast mines are decommissioned, and the utilised land is restored and recultivated.
Suppliers must gain access to the necessary commodities in the upstream value chain. Partner companies and suppliers deliver components for power stations and opencast mines or provide assistance in the dismantling of nuclear power plants. Contractors provide services and assist RWE with operations and maintenance during the use of the assets. This is followed by the decommissioning of sites and recultivation of former opencast mine premises.
Revenue from activities involving fossil fuel includes electricity production from lignite and hard coal and lignite refining in the amount of $€ 5.156$ billion and electricity generation from and trading in gas in the amount of $€ 8.538$ billion. For 2024, the total amount is $€ 13.694$ billion (see page 106). RWE did not recognise any taxonomy-aligned revenue from activities in connection with fossil gas for 2024.
Our partner companies and indirect suppliers are an important component of our business model. We work closely together with our suppliers and have introduced standards that also relate to sustainability. Good collaboration and supplier input are factors that are decisive for our business activities and achieving our sustainability goals. Besides quality and price, additional criteria are becoming increasingly important as regards procuring goods and services. Therefore, RWE continuously reviews its processes particularly in relation to purchasing - with a view to satisfying the various requirements.
In its relentless pursuit of improvement, RWE ensures compliance with its sustainability standards by adapting relevant processes both in-house and in the supply chain. RWE expects its business partners to adhere to the principles of the RWE Code of Conduct. A dedicated process helps us meet our due diligence obligation. We employ this procedure to check whether our business partners and suppliers comply with supply chain standards by performing regular risk assessments, among other things. We collaborate closely with select partner companies and develop joint topic-centric approaches with them, e.g. for the innovative continued development of components for our assets.
RWE interacts with a wide range of stakeholders on a regular basis: investors, suppliers, local communities, shareholders, creditors and RWE's own workforce, the last of which is often represented by trade unions or other bodies. The list is supplemented by political decision-makers and non-governmental organisations. Suitable dialogue formats are Iso available for partner companies and major industrial customers.
RWE uses the feedback of these stakeholders and insights from interacting with them to review its strategic priorities and planning, as well as to hone its expertise in topics and issues that are important to the company. For instance, RWE organises an employee survey once a year for its own workforce. Regular dialogue with the workforce often takes place via the employee representatives and our networks. RWE's own workforce and workers in our direct value chain can also make use of grievance mechanisms provided by the proactive approaches of the human rights management system.
Maintaining regular dialogue with various stakeholders is a factor that is key to the success of our long-term business and an indispensable element of the RWE organisation in various functions, at various levels, and across all business areas and countries.
Findings from these continuous dialogues are also factored into our due diligence processes and the double materiality assessment.

We subjected the material impacts, risks and opportunities of our business activities to an extensive evaluation in preparing our sustainability reporting. This involved identifying the material impacts on people and the environment (impact materiality) as well as assessing the risks and opportunities that materially effect RWE's financial situation and development (financial materiality). Furthermore, we described the effects of our material impacts, risks and opportunities (IROs) on our strategy and business model. In the reporting year, neither the identified impacts, risks and opportunities, nor the measures taken or planned resulted in a change to the strategy or the business model. Furthermore, in the year under review, material risks and opportunities did not have a significant financial effect on our financial or earnings position or on our cash flows.
Based on RWE's double materiality assessment (DMA) we identified the following topics as material:
The energy transition, and in turn the transition to carbon-neutral electricity generation, are making a significant contribution to mitigating climate change. We developed our Growing Green business strategy to identify and seize associated opportunities (see pages 22 et seqq.).
RWE is exposed to climate-induced transition risks due to its business model and strategy, which are caused by the transition to a low-carbon economy. This depends to a great extent on the establishment and continued development of suitable framework conditions in politics, legislation, markets and technologies. In addition, our increasing orientation towards renewable energy and the substantial investments this requires exposes us to new transition risks, which were caused in particular by political and market risks and identified as Group risks (see pages 61 et seqq.).
RWE's risk management includes systematic scenario analyses for specific risks for the medium to long-term time horizon (>1 to 10 years). Our business model and technologies are continuously subjected to impact analyses based on various parameters, which form an integral part of our strategic work. When planning major investments, acquisitions and other relevant transactions, we carefully assess all risks arising from climate-related factors. We improve our approach to performing systematic scenario analyses on an ongoing basis.
So far, our analysis of various climate change scenarios has not revealed any material foreseeable impacts on our assets which could significantly curtail our business activities through to 2039. The systematic integration of these analyses in our plant engineering processes enables us to constantly monitor the foreseeable risks to which our assets are exposed due to climate change. This approach informs RWE's strategic orientation and investment decisions while ensuring the resilience and sustainability of our business.
The comprehensive double materiality assessment (DMA) for the identification and assessment of impacts, risks and opportunities (IROs) and for the identification of material non-financial topics continues to form the analytical foundation for determining the scope of RWE's sustainability reporting. Besides statutory requirements and disclosure obligations, the material disclosure duties specified by ESRS were taken into account in particular for the aforementioned material topics and represent the contents of our sustainability reporting.
The DMA is reviewed and updated once a year. It may also be re-evaluated if occasioned by external events, such as changes in legal frameworks or standards, shifts in business activities or the expansion into new business areas.
All identified material impacts, risks and opportunities are covered by ESRS disclosure requirements. Further details from the resulting material topics (see pages 83 et seqq.), as well as RWE's material IROs are disclosed in the table below.
| Material IRO | Type | Time horizon | IRO description |
|---|---|---|---|
| E1.1 Climate change mitigation | |||
| Power generation from Phaseout Technologies | Actual negative impact - own operations |
Short-term | The extraction and burning of lignite results in greenhouse gas emissions, which are gradually being reduced due to the lignite phaseout. |
| Power generation from flexible technologies - gas and hard coal | Actual negative impact own operations and upstream processes | Short-term | Electricity generation from gas and hard coal results in greenhouse gas emissions. Gas exploration in the upstream value chain produces emissions indirectly. |
| Energy production from renewable sources and use of new technologies | Actual positive impact own operations | Long-term | The expansion and transition to renewable energy production (e.g. offshore/anshore wind and solar energy) contributes to reducing greenhouse gas emissions. |
| E1.2 Climate change adaptation | |||
| Policy and legal implications of phaseouts | Transition risk own operations | Medium-term | Potential insufficient regulatory and political support for hard coal and lignite phaseout |
| Market developments around renewables | Transition risk own operations | Medium-term | Market uncertainty regarding developments in the price of electricity from renewables or in relation to remuneration, costs and apportionments |
| Adverse regulatory changes in the USA | Transition risk own operations | Long-term | Potential adverse regulatory changes in approval procedures and subsidy mechanisms for renewable energy, e.g. in the USA |
| E1.3 Energy | |||
| Energy consumption and mix | Actual negative impact own operations | Short-term | Conventional power generation requires fossil fuels. |
| Material IRO | Type | Time horizon | IRO description |
|---|---|---|---|
| E4 Biodiversity and ecosystems | |||
| Temporary local habitat loss due to land-use change Phaseout Technologies | Potential negative impact own operations | Medium-term | Lignite mining leads to land-use change, which in turn leads to intermittent habitat losses in certain areas, which are offset. |
| Temporary freshwater-use change Phaseout Technologies | Potential negative impact own operations | Medium-term | The necessity to keep lignite mines dry requires groundwater extraction in the Rhenish lignite area. An undisturbed water balance should be restored in the long run. |
| Temporary habitat disruption and displacement of species Renewables | Actual negative impact own operations | Medium-term | Constructing onshore wind and solar forms and in particular offshore wind forms can lead to habitat disruptions and displacement of species. |
| Natural resource use and land-use change Renewables | Actual negative impact value chain | Medium-term | Building out renewable energy and storage assets requires raw materials such as steel, copper, lithium, nickel and cobalt. RWE needs such commodities for components and therefore has an indirect impact on local ecosystems in mining regions. |
| Material IRO | Type | Time horizon | IRO description |
|---|---|---|---|
| ES Resource use and circular economy | |||
| Resource use for the construction of assets | Actual negative impact own operations and value chain | Medium-term | Resource demand for the construction of offshore wind, onshore wind, solar and battery storage assets in RWE's Renewables business and of electrolysers and (hydrogen-copable) gas-fired power stations in the Flexible Generation segment |
| Waste management mainly in combustion power plants Phaseout Technologies and Flexible Generation - lignite, hard coal and gas | Actual negative impact own operations and value chain | Short-term | Waste outflows during the operation and dismantling of lignite and hard coal assets in RWE's phaseout business and of gas assets in RWE's flexible generation business |
| Material IRO | Type | Time horizon | IRO description |
|---|---|---|---|
| S1 Own workforce - working conditions | |||
| Secure employment - renewables | Actual positive impact own operations | Short-term | RWE develops and expands power generation assets, creating new job opportunities and possibilities for current and future RWE employees. Job security can lead to increased employee satisfaction. |
| Working time | Actual positive impact own operations | Short-term | RWE offers flexible working hours and has overtime regulations in place. |
| Adequate wages | Actual positive impact own operations | Short-term | Wages at RWE are often above market. |
| Social dialogue | Actual positive impact own operations | Short-term | RWE offords employees the possibility to voice their concerns and provide feedback to management. Open communication and collaboration can increase employee satisfaction and improve problem-solving. |
| Freedom of association, the existence of works councils and the information, consultation and participation rights of employees | Actual positive impact own operations | Short-term | RWE recognizes the right to freedom of association. At RWE, employees are represented by very well organised works councils. |
| Collective bargaining, including share of workers covered by collective agreements | Actual positive impact own operations | Short-term | RWE recognises the right to collective bargaining. |
| Work-life balance | Actual positive impact own operations | Short-term | RWE is committed to enhancing the work-life balance of its workforce through social policies. The company recognises the importance of family-related leave, ensuring that employees can take necessary time off for family matters without compromising their career progression. |
| S1.14 Own workforce - health and safety | |||
| Physical work in the field of wind and solar farms, power plants and opencast mining | Potential negative impact own operations | Short-term | Physical work in the field of wind and solar farms, power plants and opencast mining: RWE employees working in wind and solar farms, power plants and opencast mines are exposed to the risk of accidents and health hazards. Despite comprehensive and constantly improving occupational safety measures, for example in relation to work done high off the ground, involving heavy loads and moving asset and component parts, residual risks of accidents happening cannot be ruled out entirely. |
| Material IRO | Type | Time horizon | IRO description |
|---|---|---|---|
| S2 Workers in the value chain | |||
| Working conditions - health and safety | Potential negative impact value chain | Short-term | Employees of partner companies undertaking physical work in and around power plants can be exposed to the risk of accidents and health hazards especially when it comes to construction, repowering or demolition activities. Certain risks of accidents and health hazards also exist outside of RWE sites during mining, refining and processing of fuels as well as manufacturing, transportation and the end-of-life treatment of asset components. |
| Forced labour and modern slavery | Actual negative impact value chain | Short-term | Workers, especially those employed by indirect suppliers, often work in production or construction. They can be exposed to risks while mining, transporting and processing fuels for the conventional business. This also applies to the manufacture, transportation and disposal of asset components. |
RWE has developed its methodology to perform the DMA in line with ESRS. The materiality assessment is aligned with the overarching process for determining material impacts, risks, and opportunities (IRO). The following five steps were taken from the start of the DMA process to the sign-off of material topics:
The first step entailed gaining a contextual overview of RWE's activities, business relationships, key affected stakeholders, value chain (upstream and downstream) and the time horizon (short-, medium-, and long-term) in which IROs are expected to materialise. The relevance of the aspects mentioned for the IROs determined the next steps, e.g. determining the time horizons that could have a material impact on each of the activities.
RWE's own operations comprise all fully consolidated subsidiaries pursuant to ESRS 1.62 as well as all countries and regions (mainly Europe, the Americas, and the Asia-Pacific region) in which RWE is active. These include RWE's Renewables, Flexible Generation, Supply \& Trading and Phaseout Technologies businesses. Non-consolidated subsidiaries, joint operations, joint ventures, associated companies and contractual arrangements were reviewed and considered. This involved assessing the value of some small companies and contractual arrangements managed under RWE's operating control. Since the type of business is in line with RWE's own operations, no specific additional IROs were identified in this context.
Stakeholder groups affected by RWE's operations or interested in using RWE's external reporting were identified and prioritised. We selected suitable proxies who regularly interact with these stakeholder groups. The proxies thus represent stakeholder perspectives on relevant ESG topics. The primary purpose of our stakeholder engagement is to understand stakeholder perspectives and thus identify further impacts, risks and opportunities. These perspectives also validate the impact evaluation of the DMA.
RWE has based the process of identifying actual and potential impacts, risks and opportunities related to sustainability matters on a 'top-down' approach, using the list of topics in ESRS 1, AR 16. This list was complemented by a sector assessment, an earlier materiality assessment performed by RWE, and a review of existing processes including strategy planning and employee surveys as well as various due diligence mechanisms such as risk management, grievance mechanisms, incident management, supplier audits, as well as financial and non-financial reporting.
In addition, discussions and validations took place with relevant experts in the Group, management and works councils. When compiling the list of IROs, a distinction was made whether the impacts, risks, or opportunities apply to Phaseout Technologies (coal and nuclear), Flexible Generation (e.g. gas and biomass) or to the Renewables business (see Table 1, List of material topics).
Identified impacts, risks and opportunities were assessed by experts and validated by several internal stakeholders with quantitative and qualitative assessment criteria.
A series of criteria were applied to assess the materiality of actual and potential as well as positive and negative impacts based on severity and likelihood. Severity was further broken down into scale, scope and remediability (only for negative impacts). Probability of occurrence was only considered for potential impacts. Actual negative environmental impacts stemming directly or indirectly from RWE's business activity include measures that have already been implemented, but do not include planned future action to remediate or offset the impact. Unlike for financial materiality, we lack a reference parameter for assessing impact materiality, rendering a Group-wide comparison impossible.
Quantitative assessment criteria were applied to assess the materiality of anticipated financial effects in terms of business performance, financial situation and cash flows as well as access to finance or cost of capital over short, medium or long term. For consistency, the criteria and thresholds are aligned with the existing methodology and approach of RWE's risk management process. Risks and opportunities were rated based on the magnitude of actual and anticipated financial effects as well as the likelihood of occurrence as per the assessment from risk management. Environmental risks arising from RWE's own business activities and along its value chain were assessed in consideration of already implemented measures but before planned future action to mitigate the risk, especially transition risks. Dependencies on natural and social resources were considered as a source of financial risk or opportunity. For most impacts, the corresponding risks or opportunities were assessed and evaluated. However, the scoring was generally below the lowest score, since they represent risks below the Group threshold.
So far, physical risk assessments have not revealed that RWE assets and technologies are exposed to any significant physical risks or, in turn, any significant physical risks when adapting to climate change. RWE will constantly monitor its assets' exposure to climate risks in order to underpin its strategy and business model as well as individual financial investment decisions. For a consistent reflection of impacts in the risk management process, RWE will continue to ensure the comprehensive, systematic consideration of impacts in the operational risk assessment processes in its business areas as the basis and source for the Group risk management process. Additional details are provided in the section headed 'Risk management and internal controls in sustainability reporting'.
On completion of the IRO assessment, a previously identified quantitative threshold was applied to identify material reportable sustainability matters. An impact, risk or opportunity classified as 'significant' or 'critical' is defined as material. Impacts, risks and opportunities classified as material based on the double materiality assessment are also considered in RWE's strategic evaluations and discussions. The identified sustainability risks are identical to the ESG-relevant risks identified at Group level (see pages 61 et seqq.).
The material sustainable topics applied for RWE's sustainability reporting for 2024 were approved by the Executive Board of RWE AG in July 2024 and were shared with the Audit Committee of the Supervisory Board in August 2024.
Material impacts, risks and opportunities are reviewed at least once a year for periodic reporting or as needed, e.g. when situations change due to outcomes of risks or events.
As part of the DMA process, we subjected the impacts, risks and opportunities of all relevant matters to a systematic evaluation. It is decisive that certain requirements be satisfied when it comes to sustainability matters, in particular climate-related risks and opportunities. The approaches and requirements pertaining to physical and transition risks are presented in the following.
In 2022, RWE started systematically assessing climate-related physical risks in consideration of the Shared Socioeconomic Pathway (SSPs) scenarios as defined in the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Sixth Assessment Report. It does so by focusing on the assessment of the climate projection scenario "SSP2-4.5" and the high emission scenario "SSP3-7.0". For assets in development, we consider the scenarios in the 2040 to 2059 timeframe, while for all other assets we mainly assessed the scenarios in the 2020 to 2039 timeframe. Our analysis is based on experience gained in almost all technologies. Uncertainties arise with emerging technologies owing to our limited experience, e.g. for impacts of droughts on hydrogen production. To perform the analysis, we used site-specific coordinates and broke project data down by technical area, assigning these areas to the corresponding regions and sites.
A full list of chronic and acute physical risks considered in RWE's climate risk assessment is provided in the table below. Hazards, for which the IPCC scenarios contain no or insufficient information and their projections are marked as not available ( $n / a$ ).
The risk assessments conducted did not reveal that RWE's assets or technologies were exposed to any significant physical risks.
| Significant physical risks | Chronic | Included in risk assessment | Acute | Included in risk assessment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Temperaturerelated | Changing temperature (air, freshwater, marine water) | Yes | Heat wave | Yes |
| Heat stress | Yes | Cold wave/ frost | No | |
| Temperature variability | Yes | Wildfire | Yes | |
| Permofrost thawing | n/a | |||
| Water-related | Changing precipitation patterns and types (rain, hail, snow/ice) | Yes | Drought | Yes |
| Precipitation or hydrological variability | No | Heavy precipitation (rain, hail, snow/ice) | No | |
| Ocean acidification | No | Flood (coastal, fluviat, pluvial, groundwater) | Yes | |
| Saline intrusion | n/a | Glacial lake outburst | n/a | |
| Sea level rise | Yes | |||
| Water stress | Yes | |||
| Wind-related | Changing wind patterns | Yes | Cyclone, hurricane, typhoon | Yes |
| Storm (including blizzards, dust and sandstorms) | Yes | |||
| Tornado | Yes | |||
| Solid moss-related |
Coastal erosion | n/a | Avalanche | n/a |
| Soil degradation | n/a | Landslide | n/a | |
| Soil erosion | n/a | Subsidence | n/a | |
| Solifluction | n/a |
RWE concentrates on two of the global climate pathways developed by the IPCC, which are in line with the Sixth IPCC Assessment Report.
(3) SSP2 - 4.5: compatible with an intermediate scenario ('Middle of the Road') that calls for an average temperature increase of about 1.8 to $3.0^{\circ} \mathrm{C}$ by 2100 from pre-industrial levels. We consider this scenario as the one that is most representative of the world's current climate and regulatory environment.
(4) SSP3 - 7.0: corresponds to a scenario where measures to combat climate change are weak and implemented with little coordination. Consequently, this pathway is characterised by higher emissions that lead to a temperature increase of about 3.0 to $4.6^{\circ} \mathrm{C}$ from pre-industrial levels by 2100 .
The resilience analysis for these physical scenarios considers both chronic and acute phenomena. In assessing our sites, we differentiate between specific technological risks and generic infrastructure-related risks. Together with technology experts within RWE, we developed thresholds for specific climate risks in relation to our technologies to consider the specific vulnerability of each technology that we deploy. Technology-related risks were mainly identified for wind assets due to changing wind patterns. Other technological risks such as temperature rises for solar panels or increasing airflow for water cooling or hydroelectric power plants proved to be negligible or sufficiently mitigated.
In our view, the analysis of relevant risks with significant damage potential for infrastructure is relevant for all assets, with the focus resting on assets with a remaining service life of at least 15 years. This infrastructure-based site analysis has become a standard tool in the early exploration and development of new sites. So far, we have assessed over 350 sites based on modelled probabilities of extreme weather events (precipitation/ floods, wind speeds/storms, temperatures/heat stress and forest fires). This primarily related to sites being developed or operated for offshore wind, onshore wind and solar forms as well as hydroelectric, hydrogen and gas power plants.
Based on the ongoing analysis, to date, we have not identified any significant foreseeable risks in terms of likelihood, scope, or duration caused by physical climate-related hazards, which could have material impacts on our operations through to 2039.
Climate-related transition risks and opportunities are an integral aspect of our strategic analysis and of the Group's risks (see pages 61 et seqq.). Therefore, we constantly monitor political, technological, market and reputational developments in the countries in which RWE is active.
RWE's existing risk management system covers all types of risks with financial impacts and thus transition risks as well. Based on the classification system of the Task Force on Climate-Related Disclosures (TCFD), currently identified transition risks are mainly risks associated with energy policy. A broad range of transition risks are already being considered due to the relevance and exposure of RWE's business model. Moreover, we are in the process of considering relevant aspects of various transition scenarios more systematically. RWE has started to use the SSP1-1.9 and SSP1-2.6 transition scenarios of the IPCC CMIP 6 Shared Socioeconomic Pathway (SSP) which include a more ambitious climate policy and, in turn, a stronger reduction effort. These scenarios are referenced in the SBTi guidance for the energy sector and the integrated assessment models. Other sources of countryspecific information on these aspects are being evaluated and will gradually be included in a more systematic analysis. We have begun to use available information on transition risks in the aforementioned SSP scenarios for the assumptions made in our annual financial statements. So far, this general information has only had a few effects on the assumptions made in the annual financial statements. Country-specific (usually policy-related) transition risks identified by our own sources remain the predominant information reflected in these assumptions.
The transition risks identified by Group Risk are stated as financial risks in accordance with the TCFD categories in the double materiality assessment and in the following table:
| Transition risks (according to TCFD classification) | |
|---|---|
| Policy and legal | We are potentially exposed to regulatory risks despite the growing share of our generation portfolio accounted for by zero- and low-emissions technologies. Changes in legal requirements can have an effect, for example, on the profitability of existing or planned assets. Approvals could be issued late or not at all, granted approvals could be withdrawn temporarily or permanently, and stricter statutory or official requirements could result in additional costs. Committed compensatory payments could be challenged. The risk of non-existent or unfavourable regulatory frameworks and interventions in renewable energy subsidy mechanisms has risen recently. For instance, the regulatory environment for renewable energy in the US could change, potentially curtailing planned income in the long run. In Germany, it is currently impossible to predict to what extent the expansion of renewable energy will be spurred under the new government. The legal framework for investments in German (hydrogen-capable) gas-fired power stations is also uncertain. The British government is considering adjusting renewable energy subsidies via green electricity certificates in the UK from 2027 onwards, which might lead to earnings shortfalls. |
| Market | In most of the countries in which RWE is active, the energy sector is characterised by the free formation of prices. Declines in quotations on wholesale electricity markets can cause power generation assets to become less profitable. This also applies to renewable energy assets that do not receive fixed feed-in payments via secured contracts. Negative developments in prices or even remuneration, costs and apportionments can cause RWE to recognise impairments. |
Transitional matters are usually taken into account when performing strategic market analyses and in the development of Group-wide planning assumptions, e.g. also when performing goodwill impairment tests. This also includes an analysis of climate-driven effects on energy prices in various countries. The process envisages a regular review. However, no significant impacts on the most important planning data (medium- to longterm) have been identified to date.
RWE has sites located in proximity to biodiversity-sensitive areas, which can have a high density of species as well as unique species or ecosystems. Business activities conducted at these sites may affect these natural habitats. To mitigate its impacts, RWE has measures in place which are described in more detail under 'E4-4 Actions' in the chapter on biodiversity and ecosystems.
RWE identified and assessed its impacts on biodiversity and ecosystems in its own operations and upstream value chain with regard to terrestrial ecosystems, freshwater use, and marine ecosystems following the SBTN (Science Based Targets for Nature) guidance and the LEAP (Locate, Evaluate, Assess, Prepare) approach. Similarly, to identify and assess risks, dependencies and opportunities, RWE followed the LEAP approach and considered four risk classes: operational risks, financial risks, regulatory and political risks, and other risks. We used tools suggested by the TNFD (Taskforce on Nature-related Financial Disclosures) guidance, e.g. quantitative tools such as the World Wide Fund for Nature's Biodiversity Risk Filter and qualitative inputs such as expert opinions and desk research. Based on this analysis, RWE created a long list of potential physical (acute and chronic), transitional (policy and law, technology, market, reputation), and systemic risks and opportunities in relation to biodiversity. These were then assessed based on their financial scale and probability of occurrence. In addition, RWE identified and assessed key dependencies on ecosystem services, namely disruption protection (for example, climate regulation as well as flood and storm protection), physical inputs (e.g. surface and ground
water) and production enablers (e.g., water flow maintenance). Potential negative impacts on communities were also considered in regard to risks to which new asset construction and habitats are potentially exposed due to pollutants, which can curtail biodiversity. Direct stakeholder consultations were not conducted as part of this assessment due to the processes and findings of the previous year. The results of the analysis indicate that the financial materiality of the risks and opportunities and of the dependency of RWE's business model on biodiversity and ecosystem services does not extend beyond the provisions that have already been accrued. This assessment is regularly reviewed and updated.
The general double materiality assessment process combined with the assessment of the most recent project pertaining to the circular strategy resulted in the identification of sustainability matters that correspond to resource inflows and waste outflows and relate to the segments and underlying technologies.
RWE's transformation and above all the construction of new assets require large amounts of materials and components that can have an effect on the environment in the supply chain, depending on their origin and manufacturing process. As we are a responsible company, it is paramount to us that we understand these effects and manage these actively in order to mitigate and, ideally, avoid adverse consequences. Within the scope of our procurement activities, we have started to focus on more environmentally compatible materials and increasingly refurbish and reuse components. In many cases, being more circular translates to lower emissions.
Most of the waste is produced in large-scale power plants that are still being operated or are being dismantled and are assigned to the Phaseout Technologies and Flexible Generation segments.
The result of the assessment indicates that, for the foreseeable future, there are no further risks or opportunities or dependencies arising from RWE's strategy and business model with a material financial significance going above and beyond what we have recognised on the balance sheet. This assessment is regularly updated and adapted to changes in the external framework.
Additional information on the circular economy can be found in the chapter 'E5 Resource use and circular economy'.
To assess the IROs relating to pollution (E2) as well as water and marine resources (E3), we reviewed our activities across all technologies and business areas - primarily electricity generation from fossil fuel and biomass. RWE complies with strict environmental standards imposed by law and with legally mandated pollutant limits.
RWE pumps large amounts of water - particularly as part of its opencast lignite mining operations - to the surface, but feeds the vast majority of this back into surface waters. Water used, for example to cool power stations, accounts for a fairly small share of the total volume of water withdrawn and thus only has insignificant effects. Therefore, we do not classify this as a material topic. This also applies to the use of hydrogen capacity and the associated need for water. Most of RWE's power plants and activities are monitored by the authorities using online monitoring systems, which have not identifed any material limit transgressions. By consequence, RWE's impact in this regard is classified as not material.
Sector-specific aspects, applicable regulations, business unit activities and reported compliance incidents were considered with respect to governance (G 1). RWE has extensive management systems in place, e.g. for compliance, corruption and bribery, taxes, human rights and the environment. These management systems meet the respective standards and are largely audited by third parties. Due to the advanced degree of implementation and maturity, we have not identified any material impacts or risks in relation to these matters. Governance was thus not classified as a material topic.
RWE performed the double materiality assessment with the assistance of experts who are regularly in contact with all of the stakeholders. Press and media coverage on the one hand as well as the operating business units on the other served to represent society's perspective in general and the perspectives of affected communities in particular.
This finding was confirmed in talks with the most important stakeholder groups at RWE.
RWE has set up departments dedicated to sustainability matters at Group level and the level of its major operating companies. The Group-level sustainability department assists the Executive Board in ensuring compliance with regulatory requirements and progress in material topics. RWE's strategy relating to environmental, social and governance (ESG) matters is established by the Executive Board of RWE AG, which is responsible for determining and achieving the Group's goals. The Supervisory Board is accountable for reviewing the Sustainability Statement and directly involved in the design of the corporate and sustainability strategy, for example, via the Strategy and Sustainability Committee or for reporting duties - via the Audit Committee. RWE distributes responsibility for its prioritised sustainability topics among the members of the Executive Board of RWE AG. The CEO is in charge of sustainability and environmental protection, while the CHO oversees social matters and the workforce. The CFO is entrusted with all reporting.
RWE AG's Strategy \& Sustainability department is responsible for the Group-wide development and management of major sustainability topics. It works closely with the Group's specialist departments to align ambitions, targets and actions. It regularly reports to the Executive Board on progress made in achieving prioritised sustainability objectives and provides updates on important matters. In turn, the Executive Board keeps the Supervisory Board informed. The Head of the Strategy \& Sustainability department reports directly to the CEO of RWE AG. The coordination of targets and actions regarding sustainability matters between RWE AG and the operating companies is mainly handled by the sustainability offices and management boards.
RWE's sustainability organisation is anchored in RWE AG and coordinates the provision of information of relevance to sustainability by other specialist functions such as human resources, accounting, controlling, occupational safety, etc. at Group level. Communication and reporting with regard to sustainability matters also follow the cascaded approach into the operating companies, either via the corporate sustainability team directly and / or via the specialist functions.
The Supervisory Board adopted a skills matrix for the members of the Executive Board, which identifies key suitability criteria. The criteria include the specialist qualifications for the vacant board office, leadership skills, track record and sector knowledge. Thanks to their experience and expertise, RWE Executive Board members Markus Krebber, Michael Müller and Katja van Doren possess outstanding insights, enabling them to assess the influence of sustainability matters and take well-founded decisions for RWE.
Information on the composition of RWE's Executive Board and Supervisory Board, which monitors topics of relevance to sustainability is presented in the following table. In accordance with the German Co-determination Act, the Supervisory Board of RWE AG is equally staffed by shareholder and employee representatives and consists of 20 members. The independence of the Supervisory Board members is assessed based on the criteria established in the German Corporate Governance Code.
The Supervisory Board is composed such that its members collectively possess the knowledge, skills and professional experience required to properly perform their duties in relation to material sustainability matters and to satisfy the requirements set forth in the skills matrix for the Supervisory Board.
| Composition and diversity of administrative, management and supervisory bodies |
Unit | 2024 |
|---|---|---|
| Executive Board members | number | 3 |
| Non-executive Supervisory Board members | number | 20 |
| Women on Supervisory Board of RWE AG | number | 7 |
| Women on Supervisory Board of RWE AG | $\%$ | 35.0 |
| Women on Executive Board of RWE AG | number | 1 |
| Women on Executive Board of RWE AG | $\%$ | 33.3 |
| Women on Executive Boards of our operating companies | $\%$ | 19.0 |
| Women in management positions, one level below the Executive Boards, Group |
$\%$ | 19.7 |
| Women in management positions, two levels below the Executive Boards, Group |
$\%$ | 19.6 |
| Women in management positions, core business | $\%$ | 24.9 |
| Independent Supervisory Board members | $\%$ | 100 |
1 RWE considers all Supervisory Board members to be non-executive.
2 The Supervisory Board assesses independence based on the criteria established by the German Corporate Governance Code (GCOC). According to the GCOC, these criteria may only be applied to shareholder representatives.
The Executive Board of RWE AG was informed of the current quantitative and qualitative sustainability developments in March and September of 2024. In addition, it regularly discusses specific sustainability topics and makes all the information available to the Supervisory Board's committees.
The Strategy and Sustainability Committee of the Supervisory Board convenes once a year. The Committee is comprised of eight Supervisory Board members. The Executive Board informs the Committee as to the degree of implementation of RWE's sustainability strategy along with various other topics and provides an outlook on the biodiversity strategy including a rollout plan.
Updates on sustainability reporting were provided to the Supervisory Board's Audit Committee in July and November and to the Strategy and Sustainability Committee in December.
RWE's remuneration system for Executive Board members consists of a fixed remuneration component and a variable remuneration component. The Executive Board remuneration system is aligned with our purpose 'Our energy for a sustainable life' and the strategy of the RWE Group. The Supervisory Board determines the structure and level of Executive Board remuneration and reviews it for appropriateness and market conformity both regularly and when occasioned in accordance with the German Stock Corporation Act. ESG factors affect the level of the Executive Board's short-term incentive (STI, short-term variable remuneration) and of the long-term incentive (LTI, long-term variable remuneration).
ESG factors affect the level of the Executive Board's short-term variable remuneration (STI, short-term incentive). The Supervisory Board gave the achievement of ESG / CSR and employee motivation targets a weighting of $35 \%$ for fiscal 2024. ESG factors thus affect $35 \%$ of the individual performance factor in the STI. The long-term incentive (LTI, longterm variable remuneration) also contains an ESG component, namely carbon intensity. This has a weighting of $33 \%$ and thus affects the target achievement of the respective tranche to this extent.
It is measured as the average carbon intensity of the Group's power stations over the last three years in metric tons of carbon dioxide per megawatt of installed capacity per full-load hour (metric ton / MW / full-load hour). This key figure enables carbon dioxide emissions to be measured independent of weather- and market-induced load fluctuations. To improve the informational value of carbon intensity in respect of the ordinary course of business, the Supervisory Board can make limited adjustments and establish an adjusted actual figure for average carbon intensity if exceptional cases have not been sufficiently considered in the established goals. For instance, this allows for the consideration of effects of acquisitions and sales of generation assets that deviate from forecasts, changes in investment plans as well as regulatory and political changes leading to deviations from the planned renewable energy expansion roadmap and from the coal phaseout roadmap. A carbon intensity of 0.332 metric tons of carbon dioxide per installed megawatt was established as a target for 2024 in the three-year tranche.
RWE aims to avoid all environmental incidents - particularly serious environmental incidents with substantial and supraregional effects that compromise the ecosystem for months, clearly violate environmental standards and are of significant supraregional interest.
RWE intends to be a good employer and measures the commitment of its employees annually with this in mind. The engagement index calculated in this manner measures the degree of engagement of the RWE workforce by indicating the percentage of employees responding to questions about their motivation with "I fully agree" and "I agree". Our objective for 2024 was to achieve a rate of at least $80 \%$ (see page 151). In addition, we want to prevent RWE employees and partner company personnel from having work-related accidents and fatal work-related accidents. The number of work-related accidents is calculated based on the Lost Time Injury Frequency (LTIF) indicator. It reflects the frequency of work-related accidents leading to days of absence. Our LTIF target for 2024 was 1.8. We are committed to ensuring zeo fatalities. For both targets, see page 151.
Moreover, RWE ensures that contracts with suppliers contain the RWE Code of Conduct as well as human rights clauses. Vendors supplying RWE power plants with fuel must obtain the required qualification by going through an ESG process. We strive for 100\% coverage for both these goals, see page 162.
The response rate of the management survey on compliance is an indicator of how well the compliance basics are communicated to the employees. Here, too, we aim for a response rate of $100 \%$; see page 152 .
The following sustainability KPIs are factored into the Executive Board's remuneration alongside other financial KPIs.
| Executive Board remuneration KPIs | Unit | 2024 | Long-term variable incentive or Short-term variable incentive | Reference to chapter |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Average carbon intensity of the Group's power plant portfolio | metric tons $\mathrm{CO}_{2} / \mathrm{MW}$ per full-load hour | 0.334 | Long-term variable incentive | E1 - Climate change |
| Serious environmental incidents | number | 0 | Short-term variable incentive | E4 - Biodiversity and ecosystems |
| Engagement index | \% | 87 | Short-term variable incentive | 51 - Own workforce |
| Lost Time Injury Frequency (LTIF) - RWE Group including workers from partner companies working on our sites ${ }^{1,2}$ | Short-term variable incentive | 51 - Own workforce, S2 - Workers in the value chain | ||
| number | 1.6 | |||
| Fatal work-related accidents - RWE Group including workers from partner companies working on our sites ${ }^{1,2}$ | Short-term variable incentive | 51 - Own workforce, S2 - Workers in the value chain | ||
| number | 0 | |||
| Contracts with suppliers which include the Code of Conduct and human rights clauses | \% | 100 | Short-term variable incentive | S2 - Workers in the value chain |
| ESG assessment of business partners involved in fuel procurement for electricity generation at RWE power plants | \% | 100 | Short-term variable incentive | S2 - Workers in the value chain |
| Feedback rate of the executives' compliance survey ${ }^{3}$ | \% | 100 | Short-term variable incentive | S2 - Workers in the value chain |
[^0]
[^0]: 1 RWE employees are individuals with RWE Group employment contracts. This definition is in line with national legislation (German Commercial Code) and the definition used throughout the Annual Report, in accordance with ESRS Annex 2.
2 Includes workers from partner companies, contractors and subcontractors working on RWE sites.
3 The executive survey includes all employees classified as executives as of 31 October 2024. The survey was completed as of 7 January 2025 for the fiscal year that had just ended.
The following table shows the core elements of due diligence included in the sections of the Group Sustainability Statement.
| Core elements of due diligence | Paragraphs in the Group Sustainability Statement |
|---|---|
| a) Embedding due diligence in governance, strategy and business model | GOV-1, GOV-2, GOV-3 |
| b) Involving affected stakeholder groups in all key steps of the due diligence process | SBM-2, IRO-1 |
| c) Identifying and assessing negative impacts | IRO-1, SBM-3 |
| d) Taking action to remediate these adverse impacts | $\begin{aligned} & \text { S1-4, S2-4, } \ & \text { E1-3, E4-3, E5-2 } \end{aligned}$ |
| e) Tracking the effectiveness of these efforts and communicating the results | $\begin{gathered} \text { S1-5, S2-5, } \ \text { E1-4, E4-4, E5-3 } \end{gathered}$ |
RWE has established an Internal Control System (ICS) for sustainability in order to ensure accurate sustainability reporting. The main risks identified in connection with the processes of sustainability reporting relate to the completeness and integrity of the quantitative data points and in turn the accuracy of estimation and approximations results, the availability of upstream and / or downstream value chain data, the timing of the availability of the information, the person- or system-based interfaces, and the calculation of the data flows.
RWE's sustainability control system was set up in 2024 taking account of all best practices and platforms of existing, refined internal control systems. It thus provides a robust methodological basis for assessing and avoiding risks pertaining to sustainability-related data.
The Sustainability Department is responsible for the design of the Sustainability ICS and for reviewing its effectiveness. It applies Group-wide rules in doing so. The Accounting Department provides the coordination expertise in order to ensure that all internal controlling systems apply the same principles. We plan to subject the Sustainability ICS to an extensive review every year. This will involve RWE regularly reviewing the risk exposure of the sustainability reporting process, in order to determine whether suitable controls are in place for the identified risks. The effectiveness of the controls must be tested annually.
The first comprehensive review of the Sustainability ICS is planned for the 2025 fiscal year. The results of this annual review will be documented in a report to the Executive Board of RWE AG.
The European Union has set itself the goal of making its economy sustainable. This calls for investment in sustainable technologies. Taxonomy is a classification system in the European Union used to identify current and future sustainable economic activities. In the following, RWE reports on its activities in accordance with the EU taxonomy.
The EU taxonomy is a classification system that establishes clear definitions of what constitutes an environmentally sustainable economic activity. The European Commission is currently reviewing how the taxonomy can be simplified. On the basis of the currently valid taxonomy, economic activities are analysed in terms of their contribution to six defined environmental objectives. These objectives are climate change mitigation (CCM), climate change adaptation (CCA), sustainable use and protection of water and marine resources (WTR), transition to a circular economy (CE), pollution prevention and control (PPC) and protection and restoration of biodiversity and ecosystems (BIO). All of RWE's activities contribute exclusively to the first environmental objective, namely 'climate change mitigation'. As an energy company, our main economic activities continue to be electricity production from renewable energy and energy storage. As we are gradually phasing out electricity generation from fossil fuels, we are also reducing our $\mathrm{CO}_{2}$ emissions. This is how RWE is making a substantial contribution to the environmental objective of climate change mitigation. RWE has also set a target to achieve $95 \%$ taxonomy-aligned CapEx by 2030.
We apply the requirements of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2022/1214 of the European Parliament and of the Council dated 9 March 2022 to economic activities in certain energy sectors. Additionally, we comply with Delegated Regulation (EU) 2021/2178, which stipulates special disclosure duties for these economic activities. This is an amendment to the EU Taxonomy Climate Act to include activities relating to nuclear energy and natural gas.
We have introduced evaluation procedures and reviewed whether our activities are fundamentally covered by the EU taxonomy (taxonomy eligibility) and whether they comply with the criteria set out under the EU taxonomy (taxonomy alignment). The requirements for taxonomy alignment are met if all of the following criteria are fulfilled:
a) the economic activity makes a substantial contribution to at least one environmental objective;
b) it does not significantly harm (DNSH) any of the other environmental objectives;
c) it complies with minimum safeguards.
Our main taxonomy-aligned economic activities are electricity generation from wind, photovoltaics and hydropower. We also report electricity storage, hydrogen production and storage among our taxonomy-aligned activities.
Our natural gas-fired power generation activities do not yet comply with the criteria set out under the EU taxonomy, although we are actively investigating ways to achieve alignment. We therefore report these activities as taxonomy-eligible (CCM 4.29 and CCM 4.30), but not as taxonomy-aligned. The majority of our bioenergy activities do not yet comply with all criteria and are thus not reported as taxonomy-aligned, either (CCM 4.20 and CCM 4.8). At present, individual offshore wind farms are not yet taxonomy-aligned due to pending evidence or due to supplementary measures that are still being clarified in relation to existing authorisations. The farms are, however, reported as taxonomy-eligible (CCM 4.3).
Group economic activities that are not taxonomy-eligible include electricity generation from coal and electricity generation from nuclear energy. We continue to report the latter as not taxonomy-eligible, as we are no longer investing in the expansion of this technology. Consequently, we do not fully meet the requirements of activity 4.28 under the Complementary Delegated Act for gas and nuclear energy.
Taxonomy alignment was assessed in a multi-stage process. First, we divided our asset portfolio by economic activity in accordance with the EU taxonomy and by region, for example the USA, the European Union and the UK. Differentiating by region allows screening criteria to be considered appropriately through similarities in regional legislation. Next, we assessed the substantial contribution of the economic activity to climate change mitigation, as this is the EU taxonomy objective that all of our taxonomy-eligible activities contribute to. For most of our activities, no additional technical screening criteria have been defined to prove that they make a significant contribution to climate change mitigation. Hydrogen production, electricity generation from hydropower, gaseous fossil fuels and bioenergy are the only activities for which the delegated legal acts define specific screening criteria with definitive thresholds. With the exception of our natural gas activities and the majority of our power generation from bioenergy, we comply with these technical screening criteria. The aforementioned activities do not meet the criteria for alignment. After considering the technical screening criteria for determining whether an economic activity contributes substantially to climate change mitigation (1), we analysed whether any of the other five environmental objectives were significantly harmed and whether the minimum safeguards were complied with.
In 2022, we developed a systematic approach at Group level for the criteria under objective 2, 'climate change adaptation,' which apply to all of our activities. We also conducted a cross-portfolio climate risk analysis for our taxonomy-aligned economic activities, taking further steps to integrate the aforementioned criteria into our operational processes.
The climate risk analysis considers both climate projection scenarios that best align with the lifetimes of our newest assets, as well as long-term outlooks. All established and evoluable climate risks referenced in the delegated legal act were also referenced. The climate projection models do not include forecasting data relating to climate risks due to solid matter or certain serious events such as hailstorms. Projected changes to climate variables were identified based on a group of global climate models.
Although we take a range of measure to mitigate different sources of uncertainty, for example through the inclusion of different driver scenarios, the analysis continues to be most relevant to planned assets, assets under construction and recently commissioned assets. This is because projections often forecast that climate change will intensify over the longer term. Past analyses had already considered material environmental risks based on historical data. Changes, some of which are comprehensive, were implemented to address the findings. Noteworthy examples include flood protection for run-of-river power stations and retaining basins for plants with water-based cooling systems. The first step in these vulnerability assessments revealed, among other things, changes in wind, sunshine, precipitation and drought duration as being technology-specific climate risks. We are currently considering specific supplementary data such as the age and service life of individual assets to ascertain vulnerability. To date, we have not uncovered any significant foreseeable risks which could have a material impact on our portfolio.
Annex 1 to the first Delegated Legal Act specifies that construction and operational activities that impact existing bodies of water must meet certain criteria in order to contribute to objective 3, 'sustainable use and protection of water and marine resources'. These criteria apply to our offshore wind, hydropower and hydrogen production activities. The criteria that must be met are evidenced at project and asset level by means of permit applications, environmental impact assessments, surveys and permit requirements in relation to bodies of water, in coordination with the relevant authorities.
Objective 4 'transition to a circular economy' is pursued systematically in that RWE views progress towards a circular economy as an integral part of its sustainability strategy and has identified the objective as a material topic in its materiality assessment (see E5). Associated processes are implemented Group-wide, e.g. in waste concepts. We demonstrate compliance with the requirements using specific circular economy measures at both project and plant levels.
The only requirements defined for objective 5, 'pollution prevention and control' apply to the activity 'hydrogen production', and essentially relate to the use of chemicals. Due to the technology used, we can demonstrate that emissions fall within the referenced ranges based on the expert opinions and surveys compiled for permitting processes.
The delegated legal act defines criteria for objective 6, 'protection and restoration of biodiversity and ecosystems' that relate to all of our activities. Here, taxonomy alignment is achieved through compliance with requirements under approval procedures and is proven at plant level, for example by providing evidence of environmental impact assessments and studies.
As regards compliance with 'minimum safeguards', we draw on the Platform on Sustainable Finance reporting for minimum safeguards as well as the FAQ document on minimum safeguards published by the EU Commission in 2023 (2023 / C 211/01). Our compliance review and supporting evidence focus on key topics where meeting minimum guarantees at company level is deemed relevant under EU and international standards. These topics are human rights, corruption and bribery, taxes, competition and anti-competition law and data privacy. Overall, we comply with all requirements defined as minimum safeguards and see this as the minimum socially responsible corporate action. With regard to human rights, we have established a human rights management system for our own activities and supply chain.
Corresponding principles are set out in a policy statement, the RWE Code of Conduct, which is based on the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and the International Labour Organization's main labour standards. All employees are bound by this Code of Conduct, which also constitutes an integral part of all contractual purchasing relationships.
In the context of corruption and bribery, RWE's compliance management system, formalised through several Group regulations, is designed to prevent and detect corrupt practices. The management system is regularly reviewed for effectiveness by an external auditing firm. Our staff members can submit reports of suspected or confirmed violations using an online whistleblower system and also have access to external liaisons (see page 70).
RWE implemented a tax compliance management system based on German audit standards in 2019. Its suitability and effectiveness are monitored internally. We track the compliance risks of major foreign companies of the RWE Group through the international management system by reviewing tax declarations, tax payments and tax risks on a quarterly basis. Similar measures have been taken in the remaining compliance areas with a view to ensuring minimum safeguards at all times.
Our reporting on the three key performance indicators (KPIs) - revenue, capital expenditure (CapEx) and operating expenditure (OpEx) - complies with the EU taxonomy. These metrics are calculated using the EU taxonomy definitions: revenue is defined as the portion of revenue from products and services related to taxonomy-aligned economic activities (numerator), divided by total Group revenue (denominator). CapEx is defined as the proportion of additions to property, plant and equipment and intangible assets during the fiscal year before depreciation, amortisation and re-evaluations related to taxonomyaligned economic activities (numerator), divided by total CapEx (denominator). More information can be found on page 109.
OpEx represents the proportion of direct, non-capitalised expenditure for research and development, building refurbishment, short-term leasing, maintenance and repairs, and other direct expenditure arising from the ongoing upkeep of assets recorded under property, plant and equipment associated with taxonomy-aligned economic activities (numerator) divided by total OpEx (denominator).
Expenditure associated with the daily upkeep of our property, plant and equipment primarily relates to maintenance of wind and solar farms as well as our conventional power plants. This takes account of outsourced and in-house repair measures. Directly attributable material costs, personnel costs and other operating expenses are included in addition to the cost of the service.
When determining the KPIs, we first analysed our economic activities. This involved directly assigning individual business units and associated revenues, CapEx and OpEx to an economic activity under climate and environmental legislation. This was followed by a review of each economic activity to establish its taxonomy alignment. If direct assignment to an economic activity was not possible, we allocated the KPIs to an activity using suitable allocation procedures. To calculate revenue, the allocation to our economic activities was essentially based on internal revenue from the Supply \& Trading segment. The reason for this is that power generation is carried out at the level of the individual economic activities, whereas the sale of electricity generally takes place via the Supply \& Trading segment. Each individual revenue, CapEx, and OpEx is assigned to a single business activity, ensuring that there is no double counting. Furthermore, we verify these figures by comparing the revenue, CapEx, and OpEx of individual business activities against the overall totals.
We calculated the following data for the RWE Group's taxonomy-aligned activities for the year under review.

[^0]
[^0]: Y - Yes, a taxonomy-aligned activity.
N - No, taxonomy-eligible, but not a taxonomy-aligned activity.
N /EL - Not eligible'; not a taxonomy-eligible activity.

| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | RWE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| To our investors | Combined management report Group Sustainability Statement | Consolidated financial statements | Notes from the auditor | Responsibility statement | Further information | Annual Report 2024 |
| Proportion of revenue / total revenue | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| in \% | Taxonomyaligned per objective | Taxonomyeligible per objective | |||
| CCM | 21 | 51 | |||
| CCA | - | - | |||
| WTR | - | - | |||
| CE | - | - | |||
| PPC | - | - | |||
| BIO | - | - |
Taxonomy-aligned revenue represents $21 \%$ of total revenue (previous year: $17 \%$ ) and was largely attributable to renewable energy production, mainly wind power production. The increase over the past year was driven by elevated power generation from wind and photovoltaics, with wind increasing by $3 \%$ and photovoltaics by $1 \%$ compared to the previous year. We expect to be able to further increase the share of taxonomy-aligned revenue through the strategic expansion of electricity production from these sources. More detailed information on the Group's total revenue can be found on page 45 of this Annual Report.


| Proportion of CapEx/total CapEx | Taxonomy- aligned per objective |
Taxonomy- eligible per objective |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| in\% | 94 | 96 | |
| CCM | - | 96 | |
| CLA | - | - | |
| WTR | - | - | |
| CE | - | - | |
| PPC | - | - | |
| BIO | - | - |
Our taxonomy-aligned CapEx increased to 94\% (previous year: 89\%), largely driven by investments in wind power. We aim to expand our green generation portfolio and to make the Group net zero by 2040 at the latest. Aligned with these ambitions, our Group-wide investments target is to achieve $95 \%$ taxonomy-aligned CapEx by 2030. Total CapEx includes, among other things, of additions to the schedule of fixed assets plus additions to property, plant and equipment and intangible assets from changes of control (see page 50). We also invested in renewable energy projects, predominantly wind and solar farms, which will be commissioned in the coming years. All assets under construction or in operation met the criteria for taxonomy alignment at the time the properties and land are secured.
Therefore, we state these activities as CapEx in accordance with item 1.2.2.2. a) of the Taxonomy Regulation. We invested $€ 854$ million (CapEx B) in wind and solar power generation, hydrogen production and hydrogen as well as energy storage projects in the year under review. The projects reported last year for CapEx B (investments of $€ 502$ million in 2023) were largely continued. Some onshore wind and solar projects were not pursued further. In the medium term, i. e. over the next three years, we plan to invest up to $€ 2.7$ billion in wind (CCM 4.3), up to $€ 411$ million in solar (CCM 4.1), up to $€ 35$ million in hydrogen production (CCM 3.10), up to $€ 1.5$ million in hydrogen storage (CCM 4.12) and $€ 64$ million in electricity storage (CCM 4.10) projects. We thus state these activities as CapEx pursuant to item 1.1.2.2 b) of the Taxonomy Regulation. The following summary shows taxonomyaligned CapEx broken down by the individual component according to the CapEx definition. Additions essentially relate to additions to property, plant and equipment in the Renewables business.
| Composition of taxonomy-aligned CapEx $€$ million |
2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|
| Additions to intangible assets | 13 | 12 |
| Additions to property, plant and equipment | 9,827 | 4,543 |
| Additions to property, plant and equipment and intangible assets from business combinations |
1,338 | 5,863 |
| Additions to property, plant and equipment and intangible assets from initial consolidations (no business combinations) |
60 | 235 |
| Total taxonomy-aligned CapEx | $\mathbf{1 1 , 2 3 8}$ | $\mathbf{1 0 , 6 5 3}$ |

[^0]
[^0]: Y - Yes, a taxonomy-aligned activity.
N - No, taxonomy-eligible, but not a taxonomy-aligned activity.
N /EL - Not eligible, not a taxonomy-eligible activity.

| Proportion of OpEx/total OpEx | 4 | 5 | RWE | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| in \% | 28 | 43 | ||||
| CCM | - | 43 | ||||
| CC | - | - | ||||
| WTR | - | - | ||||
| CE | - | - | ||||
| PPC | - | - | ||||
| BIO | - | - |
The proportion of taxonomy-aligned OpEx is $28 \%$ (previous year: $24 \%$ ). This increase mainly stems from operating expenditure in wind power. Renewable generation technologies have lower operating expenditures compared to non-taxonomy-eligible activities, particularly the lignite business. The following summary shows taxonomy-aligned OpEx broken down by cost category according to the OpEx definition. Maintenance costs were our greatest relevant expense.
| Composition of taxonomy-aligned OpEx € million |
2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|
| Research and development costs | 8 | 1 |
| Short-term leasing | 1 | 1 |
| Maintenance costs | 554 | 478 |
| Total taxonomy-aligned OpEx | $\mathbf{5 6 4}$ | $\mathbf{4 8 0}$ |
Furthermore, we issued green bonds with a total volume of $€ 0.5$ billion and US $\$ 2$ billion in the year under review. In the previous year, we issued green bonds with a total volume of $€ 1$ billion. Proceeds from the green bonds are being used to expand our Renewables business as part of our Growing Green strategy. The bonds were met with keen interest from investors and were therefore placed at attractive conditions.
Adjusted CapEx is included in our reporting solely to satisfy disclosure requirements of financial enterprises, such as asset management firms, banks, securities companies and insurance companies, to prevent the double counting of revenue and CapEx from green bonds within these institutions. Adjusted CapEx differs from normal CapEx in that the numerator is reduced by the amount of investments financed with proceeds from green bonds during the reporting period. This figure totalled $€ 2.3$ billion in fiscal 2024. These adjustments explicitly do not represent modifications from a management perspective. Adjusted CapEx calculated for financial enterprises in the fiscal year amounted to $€ 8.9$ billion.
More detailed information on the taxonomy eligibility of our natural gas and nuclear activities can be found on the next page.
| Row | Nuclear energy-related activities | |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | The undertaking carries out, funds or has exposure to research, development, demonstration and deployment of innovative electricity generation facilities that produce energy from nuclear processes with minimal waste from the fuel cycle. | No |
| 2 | The undertaking carries out, funds or has exposure to construction and safe operation of new nuclear installations to produce electricity or process heat, including for the purposes of district heating or industrial processes such as hydrogen production, as well as their safety upgrades, using best available technologies. | No |
| 3 | The undertaking carries out, funds or has exposure to safe operation of existing nuclear installations that produce electricity or process heat, including for the purposes of district heating or industrial processes such as hydrogen production from nuclear energy, as well as their safety upgrades. | Yes |
| Fossil gas-related activities | ||
| 4 | The undertaking carries out, funds or has exposures to construction or operation of electricity generation facilities that produce electricity using fossil gaseous fuels. | Yes |
| 5 | The undertaking carries out, funds or has exposures to construction, refurbishment and operation of combined heat/coal and power generation facilities using fossil gaseous fuels. | Yes |
| 6 | The undertaking carries out, funds or has exposures to construction, refurbishment and operation of heat generation facilities that produce heat/ coal using fossil gaseous fuels. | No |
As previously explained, we do not meet the criteria for taxonomy alignment for the activities listed above that are relevant to our business. Therefore, none of these activities may be stated as being taxonomy aligned.
Climate change is RWE's most relevant sustainability related topic. Efforts to limit global warming are a key driver of our transformation and strategy. With 2024 marking the warmest year on record, the global implications of this trend are escalating. Concurrently, the deployment of renewables has reached unprecedented levels, highlighting their pivotal role in the global fight against climate change. RWE is committed to advancing the energy transition with ambitious emissions reduction targets that align with the Paris Agreement's $1.5^{\circ} \mathrm{C}$ trajectory, certified by the Science Based Targets initiative (SBTi). Our Growing Green strategy outlines our journey towards a net-zero energy system by 2040 with a focus on significant investments in renewable energy assets and decarbonised flexible generation. The following section presents our transition plan for climate protection. It covers RWE's strategy, business model and operations, outlining the targets, main decarbonisation levers and actions aimed at achieving net-zero emissions. We also address the risks and challenges associated with the transition to a low-carbon economy.
The most recent double materiality assessment confirmed the importance of the overarching topic of climate change and identified three material sustainability matters: climate change mitigation (E1.1), climate change adaptation (E1.2) and energy (E1.3). Please see pages 90 et seqq. for additional information on the procedures used to identify and assess material climate-related impacts, risks and opportunities.
Climate change mitigation refers to efforts taken to limit the rise in global temperatures. Our approach and actions in this domain underscore our commitment to environmental stewardship and serve to align our operational goals with global climate objectives such as the Paris Climate Agreement.
Climate change adaptation involves preparing for anticipated climate shifts, particularly addressing climate-related transition risks arising from the complex and multifaceted process of achieving a net-zero future. We have made this forward-thinking approach an integral part of our strategy, enabling RWE to effectively mitigate potential climate changerelated risks to our business and assets while capitalising on opportunities presented by climate-related changes, in order to maintain our resilience and competitiveness in a dynamic environment.
The ESRS topic 'energy' is also deemed to be material. It provides additional quantitative insights into RWE's energy consumption and mix, complementing the greenhouse gas emission metrics. This helps to clarify the extent to which RWE utilises various energy sources and fuels.
The table below provides an overview of RWE's material positive and negative climaterelated impacts on people and the environment stemming from our operations, as well as the transition risks with a potential material influence on RWE's financial position.
Power generation from lignite - Phaseout Technologies (actual negative impact, own operations)
Power generation from flexible technologies - gas and hard coal (actual negative impact, own operations and upstream value chain)
Renewable energy production and use of new technologies (actual positive impact, own operations)
Policy and legal implications of phaseouts (transition risk, own operations)
Market developments in renewable energy (transition risk, own operations)
Unfavourable regulatory developments (transition risk, own operations)
Energy consumption and mix (actual negative impact, own operations)
Please see pages 83 et seqq. for more information on how material climate-related impacts, risk and opportunities interact with RWE's strategy and business model.
RWE has set near-term and long-term emissions reduction targets for Scope 1, Scope 2, and Scope 3 emissions that conform with the Science Based Targets initiative (SBTi) criteria and recommendations. These science-based targets were validated by the SBTi in December 2024 and are in line with a $1.5^{\circ} \mathrm{C}$ global trajectory. Our near-term and longterm intensity targets align with the SBTi Sectoral Decorbonization Approach (SDA) for the power sector. All absolute near-term and long-term targets were modelled according to the SBTi Absolute Contraction Approach.
In the near term, specifically by 2030, RWE aims to reduce its Scope 1 and 2 GHG emissions from power generation by $71.1 \%$ per MWh, relative to the 2022 baseline. RWE AG also commits to reducing Scope 1 and Scope 3 GHG emissions from all electricity sales by $71.1 \%$ per MWh within the same time frame. Additionally, RWE commits to reducing all remaining absolute Scope 3 GHG emissions by $42 \%$ by 2030.
In the long term, specifically by 2040, RWE aims to reduce its Scope 1 and 2 GHG emissions from power generation by $98.3 \%$ per MWh, relative to the 2022 baseline. RWE AG also commits to reducing Scope 1 and Scope 3 GHG emissions from all electricity sales by $98.3 \%$ per MWh within the same timeframe. RWE AG further commits to reducing all remaining absolute scope 3 GHG emissions by $90 \%$. RWE will procure carbon credits for remaining residual emissions, in order to become net zero across the entire value chain by 2040.
RWE's path to net zero by 2040 is illustrated below.

| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
The table below shows the GHG emissions achieved and expected in relation to our decarbonisation targets:
| Absolute GHG emissions | Unit | Baseline value (2022) | Long-term target (2040) | Neor-term target (2030) | Expected GHG reduction (2040) | Expected GHG reduction (2030) | Absolute GHG emissions per fiscal year | Achieved GHG reduction per fiscal year | Achieved GHG reduction (cumulative in comparison to baseline) in \% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Target 1 (Scope 3) ${ }^{1}$ | million metric tons $\mathrm{CO}_{2} \mathrm{e}$ | 22.2 | 2.2 | 12.8 | $-90.0$ | $-42.0$ | 21.8 | 8.1 | $-1.7$ |
| Intensity value | Unit | Baseline value (2022) | Long-term target (2040) | Neor-term target (2030) | Expected GHG reduction (2040) | Expected GHG reduction (2030) | Intensity volume fiscal year | Achieved GHG reduction in fiscal year | Achieved GHG reduction (cumulative in comparison to baseline) in \% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Target 1 (Scope 1 and 2) ${ }^{2}$ | metric tons $\mathrm{CO}_{2} \mathrm{e} / \mathrm{MWh}$ | 0.55 | 0.01 | 0.16 | $-98.3$ | $-71.1$ | 0.46 | $-5.0$ | $-16.9$ |
| Target 2 (Scope 1 and 3.3d) ${ }^{3}$ | metric tons $\mathrm{CO}_{2} \mathrm{e} / \mathrm{MWh}$ | 0.55 | 0.01 | 0.16 | $-98.3$ | $-71.1$ | 0.45 | $-5.3$ | $-17.3$ |
1 Contains total Scope 3 emissions excluding Scope 3.3d emissions from the generation of purchased electricity sold to end customers.
2 Scope 2 emission targets are location-based
3 In accordance with the ESRS approach for operational control, the share of Scope 3.3d (emissions from the generation of purchased electricity sold to end customers) was completely reduced (methoblogical change). In line with the ESRS, emissions from non-consolidated companies and contractual agreements over which RWE has operational control are assigned to Scope 1 and 2 as a separate business activity.
If the reporting company has set GHG intensity targets, ESRS require disclosure of the associated absolute emission values. Our intensity targets are based on the total absolute Scope 1 and Scope 2 emissions and the corresponding amount of electricity produced per fiscal year. With absolute Scope 1 and Scope 2 emissions of 85.9 million metric tons of $\mathrm{CO}{2}$ e in the base year, and constant electricity production until 2030 and 2040, this equates to an estimated absolute Scope 1 and Scope 2 emissions reduction of approximately 61 million metric tons of $\mathrm{CO}{2}$ e by 2030 and around 84 million metric tons of $\mathrm{CO}_{2}$ e by 2040. These reductions are calculated relative to the base year and the reference values for our intensity targets.
RWE's decarbonisation roadmap considers both technological and regulatory factors. Achievement of the science-based targets is contingent on ongoing technological progress and government support, particularly for emerging technologies not yet available at competitive prices, such as carbon capture and storage (CCS), green hydrogen combustion and electrolysers for the production of green hydrogen. When setting climate targets, RWE also considered future growth in operations, the planned portfolio shift from conventional to renewable energy generation, the adoption of new technologies (e.g. hydrogen) and regulatory requirements, such as coal phaseout agreements in certain countries, as well as planned new investments.
To monitor progress towards these targets, RWE regularly reviews actual GHG emissions against target trajectories. The Executive Board of RWE AG receives reports on this data, which is collected by the Sustainability department. The department also regularly evaluates the effectiveness and feasibility of the climate targets and actions, ensuring they remain achievable. Furthermore, the baseline and targets are periodically reviewed in light of changes within the Group (e.g. acquisitions or divestments).
Climate change mitigation is an essential part of RWE's business strategy. The use of fossil fuels is a considerable source of emissions. At the same time, the emissions trading scheme that has been in place since 2005 provides economic incentives to reduce emissions. Technological advancements have opened up new opportunities and made electricity from renewable sources one of the main solutions for reducing the global carbon footprint. Through its strategy, RWE strives to be a part of these solutions and leverage the opportunities of an energy system with the least possible negative impact on the climate.
The Executive Board of RWE AG is responsible for our strategy and our approach to climate matters. RWE AG's strategy and business development are regularly reviewed by the Executive Board with vital support from the Strategy \& Sustainability team, which operates under the CEO's oversight. These reviews draw on internal and external scenarios related to energy market performance, reference detailed analyses from expert teams across the organisation and consider the financial situation of the company in order to evaluate the strategic direction and future capital expenditures. In this context, RWE assesses potential developments of carbon prices within relevant compliance systems as part of broader energy market modelling, primarily within the EU ETS and UK ETS. RWE does not use an overarching systematic carbon pricing scheme. Price assumptions are applied across the company to support decision-making e.g. when compiling valuations for future projects, particularly for business activities that require the purchase of certificates. Our processes ensure that changes in our portfolio due to capital allocation measures or potential acquisitions are assessed to ascertain the impact on our climate targets.
In addition to reducing our generation-related emissions by decommissioning and retrofitting existing assets as well as expanding renewables as outlined in our strategy, our targets foresee a reduction of indirect value chain emissions (Scope 3). Group Strategy \& Sustainability steers the calculation of our emissions, ensuring a high degree of transparency on current and future emissions. In alignment with the Executive Board, this department coordinates initiatives related to these emissions sources. Within the Group, the operating companies are responsible for progressing activities and processes that contribute to achieving our overarching climate targets. This encompasses the expansion of renewable generation and the reduction of both direct and indirect emissions.
The Supervisory Board regularly updates the Executive Board and is closely involved in the development of our corporate and sustainability strategy. The Supervisory Board is also responsible for determining the remuneration of the Executive Board, which is in part linked to climate considerations and the success of our strategy. Please see pages 97 et seqq, for more information.
As part its strategy, RWE actively engages with stakeholders. We champion ambitious climate targets and market mechanisms that support a reliable, efficient deployment of renewable energy. When engaging with associations, we have expectations on climaterelated topics that we see as material, e.g. support for the targets of the Paris Climate Agreement and for advancing renewable energy deployment. We regularly report on the alignment of our industry associations.
The EU has regulations in place that aim to help identify sustainable business practices. The minimum standards for EU benchmarks set by ESMA (European Securities and Markets Authority), which are in line with the objectives of the Paris Agreement, are designed to help investors support the transition to a low-carbon economy and define certain exclusion criteria for sustainable financing as outlined in Articles 12.1 (d) to (g) and 12.2 of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/1818 (Climate Benchmark Standards Regulation). RWE meets all requirements for non-exclusion except for criterion (d), which mandates the exclusion of companies which derive $1 \%$ or more of their revenues from exploration, mining, extraction, distribution or refining of hard coal and lignite. We deviate slightly from criterion (d) as a portion of our earnings is still derived from activities related to refining hard coal and lignite. Based on our revenues, this share amounts to $1.86 \%$. The corresponding share based on gross revenues is $0.80 \%$, which is below $1 \%$.
Our Growing Green strategy, first introduced in 2021 and updated in 2023 to support RWE's decarbonisation goals, includes planned net investments of billion euros between 2024 and 2030. These investments focus on wind power, photovoltaics, battery storage, hydrogen-capable gas-fired power plants and electrolysers. We are currently planning to make net investments of $€ 35$ billion between 2025 to 2030 to expand the company's generation portfolio.
One important sustainable finance instrument used to fund investments are green bonds. In 2024, RWE raised $€ 0.5$ billion and US $\$ 2$ billion in green bonds which are aligned with the UN Sustainable Development Goal 7 (Affordable and Clean Energy).
RWE continually aims to expand its asset base and thus contribute to the climate change mitigation objectives of the EU taxonomy. In fiscal 2024, 94\% of RWE's CapEx was taxonomy-aligned for the following economic activities: electricity generation from renewable sources such as PV, wind, hydropower and bioenergy, as well as electricity storage, and hydrogen production / storage (see page 108).
CapEx in the reporting year related to electricity production and refining from lignite and hard coal amounted to $€ 303$ million; for electricity production from gas, CapEx came to $€ 208$ million. Together, these expenditures account for $4.3 \%$ of RWE's total CapEx. No significant CapEx expenditures were related to oil during the reporting period.
Compared to the previous year, taxonomy-aligned revenue increased from $17 \%$ to $21 \%$ (see page 105). Taxonomy-aligned OpEx rose to 28\% (previous year: 24\%).
RWE's climate objectives are based on the methodologies established by the Science Based Targets Initiative (SBTi), employing various climate scenarios to ascertain sectorspecific emissions reduction targets. Our decarbonisation levers are aligned with the material sources of our emissions. In our evaluation and prioritisation of related measures, we considered regulatory frameworks such as the coal phaseout, and forecasts as to the accessibility and cost-effectiveness of climate-friendly technologies and products. In some cases, these parameters are linked to climate scenarios. Developments in the electricity market and the RWE Group's growth were also taken into account to model future emissions and demonstrate the impact of these levers.
The main climate protection measures and decarbonisation levers used to realise RWE's strategic and GHG reduction targets are the ongoing transition to a sustainable business model by gradually phasing out fossil fuels and the simultaneous expansion of renewable energy sources.
Please see pages 21 et seqq. for an overview of the advancements made and initiatives undertaken for renewables in the year under review. This summary encompasses detailed insights into our activities for offshore and onshore wind, solar, and battery storage, including the installed capacity at year end and capacity currently under construction.
Decarbonisation levers related to our near-term Scope 1 and 2 targets primarily include the phaseout of lignite in Germany by 2030 and the transition to biomass at our last remaining Dutch hard coal facilities in Amer and Eemshaven. In 2024, we took further steps to phase out coal by permanently shutting down six power plant units in the Rhenish mining area. The affected units were at the Neurath, Niederaussem and Weisweiler sites and had a total generation capacity of 2.4 GW. Another significant milestone was reached when Amer power plant completed its transition to 100\% biomass as of 31 December 2024. We have already decommissioned our hard coal assets in Germany and the United Kingdom. The planned phaseout of lignite-fired energy generation related and the transition from hard coal to biomass by 2030 correspond to an estimated absolute Scope 1 emissions reduction of 64.8 million metric tons of $\mathrm{CO}_{2}$ e relative to the 2022 base year.
To achieve our long-term decarbonisation targets for our own operations by 2040 and address residual Scope 1 emissions, core initiatives and levers include retrofitting our flexible power generation technologies with carbon capture and storage (CCS) and hydrogen combustion solutions. RWE is planning to deploy new gas-fired power plants to facilitate a 2030 exit from lignite and hard coal and to ensure security of supply during periods of low wind and solar generation. These gas-fired power stations will be designed to be either hydrogen-ready or to use carbon capture and storage. RWE currently has no plans to develop new gas-fired power plants without incorporating these decarbonisation measures. However, RWE's decision to invest in new gas-fired power plants depends on suitable technical conditions on the German government providing economic incentives. For existing operational assets, potential options include replacement, back-up or closure strategies, depending on regulatory and economic frameworks.
Implementing the aforementioned initiatives and levers is expected to contribute to an overall quantitative reduction in emissions of 0.39 metric tons of $\mathrm{CO}{2} \mathrm{e} / \mathrm{MWh}$ by 2030 and 0.54 metric tons of $\mathrm{CO}{2} \mathrm{e} / \mathrm{MWh}$ by 2040 respectively, compared to an intensity value of 0.55 metric tons of $\mathrm{CO}_{2} \mathrm{e} / \mathrm{MWh}$ in the 2022 base year.
In addressing value chain emissions, we encounter challenges related to the calculation of greenhouse gas emissions, such as data quality issues, dependence on value chain partners and third-party information. These challenges also impact our ability to identify and implement effective levers for decarbonising Scope 3 emissions.
Scope 3 emissions originate from our upstream and downstream value chain and require measures beyond our direct control. In setting our current targets, we have prioritised measures for the coming years that focus on decarbonising major sources of emissions. As disclosed in the Metrics - GHG emissions section, GHG emissions stemming from Scope 3 'Category 11: Use of sold products' is the biggest contributor to our total Scope 3 emissions. For the years until 2030, RWE is assessing potential measures for reducing and phasing out the sale of GHG intensive products. This lever will result in an estimated absolute Scope 3 Category 11 emissions reduction of 9.3 million metric tons of $\mathrm{CO}{2} \mathrm{e}$ relative to the 2022 base year. However, this depends on economic conditions as well as evolving market demands. Looking beyond 2030, the decarbonisation of our upstream value chain also becomes increasingly important. We have taken initial steps here by looking at the market conditions for and availability of more environmentally friendly steel, concrete and low-carbon polysilicon and glass, as these materials are crucial to the envisioned expansion of our portfolio. As a first pilot project, RWE will utilise Siemens Gameso's GreenerTowers for 36 wind turbines at its Thor offshore wind farm. Manufacturing the steel for these towers emits on average $63 \%$ less $\mathrm{CO}{2}$ compared to conventional steel.
The total estimated impact of all Scope 3 measures to achieve our Scope 3 targets by 2030 is expected to result in an absolute reduction of 9.3 million metric tons of $\mathrm{CO}{2}$ e by 2030, and 19.9 million metric tons of $\mathrm{CO}{2}$ e by 2040 relative to the base year value of 22.2 million metric tons of $\mathrm{CO}_{2} \mathrm{e}$.
The preconditions for the implementation of the aforementioned actions to reduce RWE's Scope 1 and 2 emissions are:
The preconditions for the implementation of the aforementioned measures to reduce Scope 3 emissions are:
We see potential transition risks, such as the lack of or delayed implementation of government incentives or market mechanisms, for example in relation to carbon capture and storage or the conversion of gas-fired power plants to hydrogen. This may lead to the prolonged use of emission-intensive plants and products associated with phaseout technologies. As a result, there is a risk that we will not achieve our GHG reduction targets.
| Scope 1, 2 and 3 emissions ${ }^{1}$ | Retrospective | Milestones and targets years | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| metric tons $\mathrm{CO}_{2} \mathrm{e}$ | Base year (2022) ${ }^{2}$ | 2024 | 2025 | $2030^{3}$ | $2040^{3}$ | Annual \% target / base year | |
| Scope 1 GHG emissions | |||||||
| Gross Scope 1 GHG emissions | 85,736,423 | 53,242,042 | n.a. | n.a. | n.a. | n.a. | |
| Percentage of Scope 1 GHG emissions from regulated emission trading schemes | 97.2 | 97.1 | n.a. | n.a. | n.a. | n.a. | |
| Scope 2 GHG emissions | |||||||
| Gross location-based Scope2 GHG emissions | 195,727 | 392,956 | n.a. | n.a. | n.a. | n.a. | |
| Gross market-based Scope2 GHG emissions | 195,727 | 392,956 | n.a. | n.a. | n.a. | n.a. | |
| Significant Scope 3 GHG emissions | |||||||
| Total gross indirect (Scope 3) GHG emissions | 22,151,605 | 21,766,996 | n.a. | 12,848,724 | 2,215,297 | $5.3 \%$ | |
| of which: Category 1 - Purchased goods and services | 1,215,132 | 1,283,837 | n.a. | n.a. | n.a. | n.a. | |
| of which: Category 2 - Capital goods | 1,013,348 | 3,657,603 | n.a. | n.a. | n.a. | n.a. | |
| of which: Category 3 - Fuel and energy-related activities | 3,965,967 | 2,293,661 | n.a. | n.a. | n.a. | n.a. | |
| of which: Category 4 - Upstream transportation and distribution | 40,552 | 31,689 | n.a. | n.a. | n.a. | n.a. | |
| of which: Category 5 - Waste generated in operations | 218,265 | 189,037 | n.a. | n.a. | n.a. | n.a. | |
| of which: Category 6 - Business travel | 7,438 | 17,989 | n.a. | n.a. | n.a. | n.a. | |
| of which: Category 7 - Employee commuting | 24,120 | 28,609 | n.a. | n.a. | n.a. | n.a. | |
| of which: Category 8 - Upstream leased assets | n.a. | n.a. | n.a. | n.a. | n.a. | n.a. | |
| of which: Category 9 - Downstream transportation and distribution | 12,553 | 6,500 | n.a. | n.a. | n.a. | n.a. | |
| of which: Category 10 - Processing of sold products | 102,027 | 70,829 | n.a. | n.a. | n.a. | n.a. | |
| of which: Category 11 - Use of sold products | 12,122,724 | 11,928,717 | n.a. | n.a. | n.a. | n.a. | |
| of which: Category 12 - End-of-life treatment of sold products | n.a. | n.a. | n.a. | n.a. | n.a. | n.a. | |
| of which: Category 13 - Downstream leased assets | 27,375 | 70,522 | n.a. | n.a. | n.a. | n.a. | |
| of which: Category 14 - Franchises | n.a. | n.a. | n.a. | n.a. | n.a. | n.a. | |
| of which: Category 15 - Investments | 3,402,104 | 2,188,004 | n.a. | n.a. | n.a. | n.a. | |
| Total GHG emissions | |||||||
| Total GHG emissions (location-based) | 108,083,755 | 75,401,993 | n.a. | n.a. | n.a. | n.a. | n.a. |
| Total GHG emissions (market-based) | 108,083,755 | 75,401,993 | n.a. | n.a. | n.a. | n.a. |
1 The section 'Specific reporting methodology - GHG' contains all relevant methodological information for all scopes.
2 The base year was restated due to methodological changes in the reporting framework.
3 In accordance with the SEFI Guidance for the power sector, RWE has officially set Scope 1 and Scope 2 intensity targets rather than absolute targets. Due to the inclusion of small units for which RWE provides O\&M services, the base year of these reference values differs slightly from the base year in the 'Base year (2022)' column. The reference values for the years 2030 and 2040 for 'Total gross indirect (Scope 3) GHG emissions' exclude Scope 3.3d emissions from the generation of purchased electricity sold to end customers.
RWE has chosen 2022 as a representative base year for its SBTi-approved climate targets.
Total Scope 1 emissions broken down into operating segments are as follows:
| Scope 1 GHG emissions | Unit | 2024 |
|---|---|---|
| (1) Renewables - Offshore Wind | million metric tons $\mathrm{CO}_{2} \mathrm{e}$ | 0.0 |
| (2) Renewables - Onshore Wind/Solar | million metric tons $\mathrm{CO}_{2} \mathrm{e}$ | 0.0 |
| (3) Flexible Generation | million metric tons $\mathrm{CO}_{2} \mathrm{e}$ | 15.1 |
| (4) Supply \& Trading | million metric tons $\mathrm{CO}_{2} \mathrm{e}$ | 0.0 |
| Other | million metric tons $\mathrm{CO}_{2} \mathrm{e}$ | 0.0 |
| Core business - total Scope 1 GHG emissions | million metric tons $\mathrm{CO}_{2} \mathrm{e}$ | 15.1 |
| (5) Phaseout Technologies | million metric tons $\mathrm{CO}_{2} \mathrm{e}$ | 38.1 |
| Total RWE Group Scope 1 emissions | million metric tons $\mathrm{CO}_{2} \mathrm{e}$ | 53.2 |
Scope 1 emissions attributable to the consolidated accounting group (the parent and subsidiaries) amounted to 53,242,042 metric tons of $\mathrm{CO}_{2}$ e in 2024.
Scope 1 emissions attributable to investees such as associates, joint ventures or unconsolidated subsidiaries that are not fully consolidated in the financial statements of the consolidated accounting group, as well as contractual arrangements that are joint arrangements not structured through an entity (i.e. jointly controlled operations and assets) under RWE's operational control amounted to 3,251 metric tons of $\mathrm{CO}_{2}$ e in 2024.
Scope 2 emissions attributable to the consolidated accounting group (the parent and subsidiaries) amounted to 392,956 metric tons of $\mathrm{CO}_{2}$ e in 2024.
Scope 2 emissions attributable to investees such as associates, joint ventures or unconsolidated subsidiaries that are not fully consolidated in the financial statements of the consolidated accounting group, as well as contractual arrangements that are joint arrangements not structured through an entity (i.e. jointly controlled operations and assets) under RWE's operational control amounted to 1,435 metric tons of $\mathrm{CO}_{2}$ e in 2024.
Biogenic emissions result mainly from the combustion of biogenic fuels and only apply to Scope 1, i.e. burning biomass or biogenic fuels in RWE's own operations.
| Biogenic $\mathrm{CO}_{2}$ emissions | Unit | 2024 |
|---|---|---|
| Scope 1 | metric tons $\mathrm{CO}_{2} \mathrm{e}$ | $3,472,461$ |
| GHG intensity per net revenue | Unit | Target (2040) | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
| GHG intensity (location-based) per net revenue | million metric tons $\mathrm{CO}_{2} \mathrm{e}$ per $€$ million | $\begin{gathered} \text { n/a } \ \hline \end{gathered}$ | 0.003 |
| GHG intensity (market-based) per net revenue | million metric tons $\mathrm{CO}_{2} \mathrm{e}$ per $€$ million | n/a | 0.003 |
| Carbon intensity Scope 1+2 (location-based) | metric tons $\mathrm{CO}_{2} \mathrm{e}$ per MWh | 0.01 | 0.46 |
| Carbon intensity Scope 1+2 (market-based) | metric tons $\mathrm{CO}_{2} \mathrm{e}$ per MWh | $\begin{gathered} \hline \text { n/a } \ \hline \end{gathered}$ | 0.46 |
RWE's GHG intensity is calculated by dividing the total GHG emissions by the revenue of the respective reporting period. The revenue used for calculating GHG emission intensity is reconciled with the financial statements. In addition to this, RWE calculates carbon intensity based on generated power and sets its targets accordingly.
RWE operates in high climate impact sectors as classified under NACE Sections A to H and Section L in accordance with Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2022/1288. These sectors are defined by their substantial potential impact on the climate, typically due to significant energy consumption or intensive resource use. High climate impact sectors are critical in the context of climate policies due to their substantial contributions to greenhouse gas emissions, thereby necessitating rigorous regulatory oversight and innovative mitigation strategies to align with global climate goals. This section provides an understanding of RWE's metrics for total energy consumption, energy production and energy intensity, broken down by energy source.
| Energy consumption and mix | Unit | 2024 |
|---|---|---|
| (1) Fuel consumption from coal and coal products | MWh | 108,673,566 |
| (2) Fuel consumption from crude oil and petroleum products | MWh | 346,640 |
| (3) Fuel consumption from natural gas | MWh | $63,070,788$ |
| (4) Fuel consumption from other fossil sources | MWh | 2,928,226 |
| (5) Consumption of purchased or acquired electricity, heat, steam, and cooling from fossil sources | MWh | 1,017,201 |
| (6) Total fossil energy consumption (calculated as the sum of lines 1 to 5) ${ }^{1}$ | MWh | 176,036,422 |
| Share of fossil sources in total energy consumption | $\%$ | 95.9 |
| (7) Fuel consumption from renewable sources, including biomass (also comprising industrial and municipal waste of biologic origin, biogas, renewable hydrogen, etc.) | MWh | 7,467,807 |
| (8) Consumption of purchased or acquired electricity, heat, steam, and cooling from renewable sources | MWh | 17,408 |
| (9) Consumption of self-generated non-fuel renewable energy | MWh | 6,994 |
| (10) Total renewable energy consumption (calculated as the sum of lines 7 to 9) | MWh | 7,485,214 |
| Share of renewable sources in total energy consumption | $\%$ | 4.1 |
| Total energy consumption (calculated as the sum of lines 6 and 10) ${ }^{2}$ | MWh | 183,521,636 |
1 Consumption of self-generated non-renewable energy is included under relevant fuel consumption type as well as total fuel consumption.
2 In 2024, energy consumption from nuclear sources associated with our EPZ investment was immaterial.
| Energy production | Unit | 2024 |
|---|---|---|
| RWE renewable energy production | MWh | 48,796,356 |
| RWE non-renewable energy production ${ }^{1}$ | MWh | 69,004,779 |
1 Includes energy production from the technologies lignite and hard coal, gas, nuclear and other (mainly waste).
| Energy intensity | Unit | 2024 |
|---|---|---|
| Total energy consumption from activities in high climate impact sectors ${ }^{1}$ | MWh | 175,315,966 |
| Energy intensity - total energy consumption from activities in high climate impact sectors | $\begin{gathered} \text { MWh } / \ € \text { million } \end{gathered}$ | 14,895 |
1 Total energy consumption consists of the fuels lignite, hard coal, gas and other (mainly waste).
Connectivity of energy intensity with
financial reporting information
Revenue from activities in high climate impact sectors used to calculate energy intensity
Revenue (from activities in non-high climate impact sectors)
Total revenue (in consolidated financial statements)
| Unit | 2024 |
|---|---|
| € million | 11,769.98 |
| € million | 12,454.37 |
| € million | 24,224.35 |
RWE reports its greenhouse gas emissions in accordance with the principles, requirements and guidance of the Greenhouse Gas Protocol Standard, using its publicly available Greenhouse Gas Emission Inventory\&Calculation Methodology. This encompasses all direct greenhouse gas emissions, namely carbon dioxide, methane, nitrous oxide, hydrofluorocarbons, perfluorinated compounds, nitrogen trifluoride and sulphur hexafluoride, which are all expressed as $\mathrm{CO}{2}$ equivalents $\left(\mathrm{CO}{2} \mathrm{e}\right)$.
For $\mathrm{CO}_{2}$ emissions from the combustion of fossil fuels in its power stations, RWE utilises the official data collected as part of the EU Emissions Trading Scheme (EU ETS) and UK Emissions Trading Scheme (UK ETS). Additional emissions from assets outside the EU ETS are calculated separately and added to the total figure.
For emissions resulting from fuel combustion in company-owned or controlled vehicles, RWE reports on crew and maintenance ships for its wind farms, ocean freighters operated on RWE's behalf, cars that are owned or leased by RWE and other vehicles.
As RWE operates lignite mines, it also accounts for very small amounts of outgassed methane.
RWE's Scope 2 emissions mainly stem from purchased electricity and heat for own usage. Purchased electricity includes electricity consumed by power plants when no own power is generated, and an external supply is needed. It also includes electricity consumed by company-owned and leased administrative buildings, offices and electric cars. Purchased heat includes the heat RWE purchases for administrative buildings.
Where no reliable data is available, RWE utilises assumptions from comparable sites and extrapolates the available data for all sites.
Owing to the relatively minor contribution of Scope 2 emissions to its total greenhouse gas emissions, RWE rarely enters into contractual power purchase agreements that stipulate supplier- or utility-specific emission rates. Such agreements are often standard practice for energy producers. As the majority of operating sites mainly use self-produced electricity or RWE-owned electricity from another site, the proportion of contractual agreements with third parties is generally low. In addition, as an energy generating company, RWE purchases electricity from the grid without additional contractual information as to the origin. Therefore, the currently available information on the proportion and types of contractual instruments used for the sale and purchase of energy - whether combined with attributes about related to energy generation or not - is not representative for RWE. As outlined in the GHG Protocol Scope 2 Guidance, RWE's data quality does not fully align with the Scope 2 quality criteria concerning contractual instruments. Consequently, RWE exclusively relies on the emission factors of the location-based method (national or gridaverage emission factors) to calculate market-related Scope 2 emissions.
According to the Greenhouse Gas Protocol Standard, Scope 3 emissions are divided into 15 categories, of which the following are applicable for RWE:
Category 1: Purchased goods and services
Emissions associated with the majority of products and materials sourced from third parties are calculated on the basis of annual procurement spend data combined with suitable emission factors.
Category 2: Capital goods
Similar to Category 1, spending data is utilised to calculate emissions.
Category 3: Fuel and energy-related activities
All positions encompass the corresponding indirect upstream emissions of the positions in Scope 1 and 2. RWE does not account for upstream emissions for lignite, as it is fully encompassed within our own operational activities.
Category 4: Upstream transportation and distribution
Emissions are calculated from transport where RWE is responsible for delivery and payment by calculating the distances in kilometres per means of transport, e.g. by train, and multiplied by the respective mode-specific emission factor.
Category 5: Waste generated in operations
Suitable emission factors are applied for the different disposal routes, accounting for all waste quantities disposed or recovered in the downstream value chain.
Category 6: Business travel
RWE uses internal data on the activities and various emission factors. Certain assumptions are made, e.g. on distance categories for flights (continental vs. intercontinental). RWE includes all travel data available through the booking systems used.
Category 7: Employee commuting
To assess emissions, RWE uses global employee figures and average emission factors per country taking into account general distances and modes of transportation per country.
Category 9: Downstream transportation and distribution
Data is sourced from internal systems.
Category 10: Processing of sold products
RWE supplies customers with various mineral products that can be used for different purposes. RWE records these emissions generated in further processing, through the quantity of products delivered to end customers.
Category 11: Use of sold products
RWE markets lignite refinement products directly to end consumers. These emissions are generated by the end consumers. In addition to lignite products, RWE also includes the emissions from gas sold to end customers and used for energy generation.
Category 13: Downstream leased assets
From the reporting year 2024 onwards, RWE includes the emissions for own assets leased to third parties under financial lease agreements, where the asset is no longer recorded on RWE's balance sheet. These are reserve capacities or plants for grid stabilisation that RWE leases to a transmission grid operator.
Category 15: Investments
According to the investment-specific method, emissions are sourced from the public reports of affiliated companies and weighted based on RWE's equity share. Prior-year data serves as the basis for estimating the current year's GHG emissions of RWE's financial participations where actual data is not yet available due to differing reporting periods.
Since RWE reports GHG by operational control, all leased offices are included in Scope 1 and 2. Therefore, RWE does not report Category 8 'Upstream leased assets'. Categories 12 and 14 have both been identified as not material to the Scope 3 inventory. Related emissions are therefore not calculated or reported. This assessment is reviewed periodically.
Scope 3 emissions are measured using inputs from activities within our upstream and downstream value chain, using either primary data obtained from value chain partners or indirect data and estimations. As at 31 December 2024, 77\% of Scope 3 emissions are calculated using primary data obtained from suppliers or other partners in the value chain.
In addition to the concept of financial control, the ESRS also incorporate the concept of operational control. This is relevant when an undertaking holds the licence or permit, or has a contractual right or practical ability to operate the relevant asset. Operational control also covers the ability to decide on the operation (dispatch) of assets arising from associates, joint ventures, unconsolidated subsidiaries (investment entities) and contractual arrangements. These arrangements can include the use of rights through leasing contracts or power purchase agreements.
Under the operational control approach, a company accounts for 100\% of the emissions over which it has operational control. For its associates, joint ventures, unconsolidated subsidiaries and contractual arrangements, RWE includes the GHG emissions only if it has operational control or reports its relevant share.
For associates where RWE has financial participation, but lacks operational control, assets or stakes are generally allocated to Scope 3, Category 15 (Investments). Here, RWE is currently focusing on financially material investments that cause significant emissions, particularly from high-emission activities.
Data for emissions accounting is gathered biannually for Scope 1 and Scope 2 GHG emissions and annually for Scope 3 GHG emissions and used mainly for external as well as internal reporting purposes. Data collection within the value chain (e.g. Category 3.15) may vary from RWE's reporting year for entities with different reporting periods. In these cases, prior-year data is used as the basis for estimating the current-year GHG emissions within the value chain. This applies to approximately 5\% of GHG emissions in Scope 3. Furthermore, in Category 3.7 'Employee commuting', we estimate and calculate data based on publicly available statistics by country, which amounts to $0.13 \%$ of Scope 3 GHG emissions.
All of the metrics in the E1 chapter collected by RWE are not additionally validated by a separate external body.
There were no significant organisational changes in the year under review.
RWE uses an ESG platform from UL Solutions for all GHG emission calculations. Emission factors are obtained from various public and non-public sources, with a preference for contracted databases that receive regular automated updates; we hold paid licences to access some of these databases. Some emissions data is obtained directly from thirdparty suppliers who use their own calculations for customers or partners. In these instances, RWE generally refrains from conducting its own calculations.
Human activities, including changes in land use and climate change, have a significant impact on biodiversity. With regard to RWE's business activities, lignite mining leads to land-use change, which might temporarily result in habitat loss in certain areas, but this can be offset. The construction and operation of our plants also has an impact on ecosystems. RWE has recognised this and made biodiversity a focal point of its sustainability strategy.
RWE's operations are guided by comprehensive environmental regulations and permitting conditions. RWE complies with all relevant regulations and permit requirements that address potential biodiversity and ecosystem impacts. In order to avoid or reduce impacts on biodiversity, we are committed to the mitigation hierarchy, a set of principles that is anchored in various standards such as the Global Biodiversity Framework (CBD) or the EU Biodiversity Strategy 2030. These principles form the foundation of our business activities. This involves first avoiding, then minimising, restoring and, as a last resort, offsetting any negative impacts on biodiversity and ecosystems caused by its business activities and its value chain, wherever feasible.
The transition to renewable electricity generation and storage, along with the planned phaseout of lignite, is vital for reducing the biodiversity impacts of climate change. RWE is actively recultivating areas of opencast lignite mines that are no longer in use and is legally obliged to convert the majority into agricultural land, forest areas or other biotopes. These restoration and renaturation efforts create diverse, ecologically valuable areas, providing habitats for numerous species and enhancing local species diversity. In order to reduce or, if possible, to avoid biodiversity impacts, RWE considers these factors throughout the entire lifecycle of its assets.
We are aware that the mining of raw materials needed for our business operations presents potential risks to biodiversity and ecosystems. Therefore, RWE strives to minimise and, if possible, to avoid the indirect impact on local biodiversity by sourcing raw materials with a low environmental impact within our value chain.
Biodiversity and ecosystems - we have identified biodiversity loss as a material sustainability aspect in our double materiality assessment (see pages 84 et seqq.).
RWE has taken comprehensive measures to mitigate direct impact drivers, in order to halt and reverse the potential effects of biodiversity loss, in accordance with the objectives set by the Kunming-Montreal agreement (Global Biodiversity Framework). Our approach and actions in this domain underscore our commitment to environmental stewardship and align our operative targets with maintaining biodiversity and nature conservation.
As we continue to deliver our Growing Green strategy, we are working to ensure that the expansion and transformation of our portfolio makes as little impact on wildlife and ecosystems as possible. Not only do we comply with all regulatory requirements, we want to go further, striving to achieve a net-positive biodiversity impact in new projects from 2030 onwards.
In 2023, RWE conducted a Nature Impact Assessment of our activities, following the latest Taskforce on Nature-related Financial Disclosures (TNFD) guidance on its LEAP approach (Locate, Evaluate, Assess, Prepare). This assessment aimed to identify and understand RWE's impacts, risks, opportunities and dependencies on biodiversity and ecosystems. We have also incorporated the results of the impact assessment into the double materiality assessment (see pages 184 et seqq.). As part of the assessment, the proximity of RWE's sites to officially recognised protected areas, the Natura2000 network of protected areas, and Key Biodiversity Areas was identified through the Integrated Biodiversity Assessment Tool (IBAT), a tool recommended by TNFD guidelines. Key Biodiversity Areas are sites that contribute significantly to the global persistence of biodiversity in terrestrial, freshwater and marine ecosystems. An overview of RWE's sites and key biodiversity areas can be found on pages 138 et seqq.
RWE has identified four impacts related to biodiversity and ecosystems: local temporary habitat loss due to land-use change, temporary change in freshwater-use, habitat disruption and displacement of species, and natural resource use and land-use change. Lignite mining (a phaseout technology) leads to land-use changes due to the remodelling of the landscape, which can be accompanied by temporary habitat losses in certain areas, but which are compensated for elsewhere. In order to keep the opencast mines dry, groundwater must be pumped out temporarily, most of which is returned to surface water elsewhere. However, there are extensive obligations to make the affected areas fully usable again and to renaturalise them. These are long-term obligations, but they are already reflected in the existing regulatory framework and are the subject of ongoing approvals.
The construction of renewable energy assets can have an impact on surrounding biodiversity and ecosystems. Building onshore wind, offshore wind and solar projects can contribute to habitat disruption and displacement of species. Constructing these assets, as well as building storage assets, requires large amounts of critical raw materials such as copper, lithium, nickel and cobalt. These may be sourced from biodiversity-rich areas upstream in our supply chains. RWE usually procures such commodities in the form of components which contain these materials. As a result, there are impacts on ecosystems in the mining regions. The material impacts of RWE summarised in the table below were evaluated as part of RWE's double materiality assessment (see pages 83 et seqq.).
As risks related to biodiversity could exceed defined thresholds, they are also considered in our Group risk management system (see pages 61 et seqq.). Specifically, RWE acknowledges the general risk of nature-related regulations and potential reputational risks as well as nature-related dependencies such as the water supply. Provisions in our balance sheet which may cover biodiversity aspects include, for example, provisions for the recultivation of lignite mining areas or dismantling wind and solar farms (see page 55). No material risks were identified beyond the provisions already recognised on the balance sheet.
Local temporary habitat loss due to land-use change - Phaseout Technologies (potential negative impact, own operations)
Temporary change in freshwater-use - Phaseout Technologies (potential negative impact, own operations)
Temporary habitat disruption and displacement of species - Renewables (actual negative impact, own operations)
Natural resource use and land-use change - Renewables (actual negative impact, value chain)
By incorporating the principles of biodiversity, we want to reduce the impact of our business activities on habitats and species. We intend for new facilities to have a net positive impact on biodiversity from 2030 onwards, with the goal of measuring biodiversity impact for all facilities by 2028.
The United Kingdom, one of our core markets, is one of the first countries where regulatory requirements for biodiversity protection are in line with global frameworks such as the Global Biodiversity Framework (GBF). Since 2024, a 10\% net gain in biodiversity is mandatory for terrestrial infrastructure projects, including the construction of renewables assets. At our UK solar farms, we aim to deliver on average five times the national requirement for biodiversity net gain (i. e. $50 \%$ ), thus supporting the UK government's nature recovery targets as well as climate neutrality efforts.
RWE is also working towards establishing targets for biodiversity and ecosystem protection. Approaches for impact measurement and nature-target setting are still a challenge for businesses. The evolving nature of governmental and regulatory frameworks further adds to the complexity. We are committed to supporting initiatives such as the Science Based Targets for Nature (SBTN) and will assess the possibility of aligning our future targets with SBTN guidelines as soon as they become available specifically for the energy sector.
We have specified initial key performance indicators to measure our impact on biodiversity. These key figures will also help us to measure our progress in the future (see pages 138 et seqq.).
In order to achieve our sustainability ambitions, we have developed a biodiversity strategy that integrates the protection and promotion of biodiversity into RWE's business activities. Our business activities along the entire value chain can have temporary impacts on nature. Our current efforts are primarily focused on our own activities. RWE deploys resources effectively where there is the greatest potential to achieve positive results. To reduce natural resource consumption and the change in land use from the extraction of critical raw materials with a high environmental impact in the RWE value chain, RWE also works to reduce the use of resources through the circular economy (see pages 142 et seqq.) and is committed to environmental protection with its suppliers. In addition, RWE fulfils its renaturation obligations.
An effective biodiversity strategy for RWE needs to respect the different regulatory guidelines in each of our markets as well as the importance of the topic globally and for RWE. First, we set out our ambitions: to reach a net-positive impact on biodiversity for new assets. This serves as a guiding principle for all of our efforts. The focus of RWE's netpositive approach includes enhancing both the extent and condition of habitats, aiming to improve species population size and the variability of species as well as to reduce extinction risks. Our strategy contains roadmaps that we use to work towards and ultimately achieve our ambitions. In doing so, we are guided by international and European standards such as the EU Biodiversity Strategy 2030 and the Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework.

We defined a four-step approach. Phaseout Technologies, the Flexible Generation segment and the growing Renewables business are all at different stages, as a result of the different business needs, applicable regulations and regional requirements as well as the level of scientific understanding about biodiversity.
RWE operates in a highly regulated sector and due to the nature of our business we are required to undertake comprehensive Environmental Impact Assessments (EIAs). These are mandatory for most of assets, and form of the permitting process. Potential impacts are therefore assessed and mitigation measures are implemented, whether as part of the EIAs or the resulting permits. As part of our social commitment, we also take social impacts into account when planning new facilities. We did not identify any material negative impacts on communities in the course of our double materiality assessment.
In cases where the required measures do not achieve a net-positive impact on biodiversity, RWE's efforts often go beyond the regulatory requirements. We aim to have a positive impact based on the following principles, which are set out in our Group-wide biodiversity policy, in addition to the hierarchy of remedial measures:
In the lignite sector, RWE goes beyond the legal requirements in the recultivation of opencast mines and takes additional voluntary measures to promote biodiversity in order to effectively minimise and compensate for the effects of local temporary habitat loss as a result of land-use changes (see page 135). RWE also regularly monitors the effectiveness of measures to restore areas and the development of target species. For example, the 'Sophienhöhe', created as a result of recultivation activities in relation to opencast lignite mining in Hambach, has the status of a restored forest and open landscape in which rare animal and plant species thrive. At the same time, this area offers more than 100 kilometres of hiking trails for local recreation.
RWE considers biodiversity aspects throughout all stages of project development, starting from project planning through to decommissioning or repowering of renewable energy assets.
In parallel with the legally mandated Environmental Impact Assessments, we take the natural environment into account in our decisions, in order to avoid and minimise impacts to biodiversity and ecosystems. During construction and operation, we implement comprehensive measures to further mitigate potential impacts. If necessary, or in accordance with legal requirements, we take compensatory measures. Additionally, we seek opportunities to design our assets in a nature-inclusive way, enhancing biodiversity where possible.
Generally, the Head of Strategy \& Sustainability at RWE is responsible for the development and implementation of RWE's Biodiversity Strategy and its Governance Framework across our business. We continue to evolve our biodiversity policy to encompass all relevant developments in our business as well as new scientific insights. To monitor progress on current actions, targets, milestones and initiatives, the Group Sustainability department provides biannual updates to the CEO of RWE AG and discusses progress with the respective biodiversity experts from the relevant operational companies on a bimonthly basis.
RWE encourages the contractors in its value chain to adopt more environmentally responsible practices. This includes taking a proactive approach and developing technologies that are more environmentally friendly. In addition, potential suppliers must undergo a qualification process that includes an ESG screening covering several sustainability topics. Suppliers must also comply with RWE's Code of Conduct, which requires them to use responsible environmental practices.
Our activities help to reduce biodiversity loss. In the period under review, RWE invested more than $€ 11$ billion in economic activities that are taxonomy-aligned and therefore do not have a significant impact on biodiversity and ecosystems. In addition, RWE used funds amounting to $€ 16$ million for agricultural and forestry recultivation measures. RWE's operating units plan targeted biodiversity initiatives wherever they are suitable for minimising impacts at the operational level. The funds for the measures are not coordinated centrally, but are provided from the respective operating budgets of the Group companies.
Taking the necessary precautions to protect biodiversity when possible and suitable is an integral part of the way we work, starting from early project development through to the construction, operation and decommissioning phases. This approach results in different actions depending on the business activity of each operating company.
Our activities to enhance biodiversity and effectively mitigate local temporary habitat loss due to land-use change in our lignite business include current measures in recultivation areas at the Inden, Hambach and Garzweiler opencast mines in the Rhenish lignite region. RWE develops and pursues strategies to promote biodiversity in these restored areas. RWE is actively restoring former mining sites for agricultural purposes, as forests, meadows, water bodies, or special sites for rare animals and plant species.
Lignite mining requires temporary water extraction to keep the opencast mines dry. This generally does not affect the surrounding flora. The plants are provided with moisture from fertile topsoil, which remains unaffected by groundwater extraction. To reduce possible impacts, RWE has installed an extensive underground pipeline network. During the reporting year, these measures were continued. Furthermore, RWE operates a large number of fountain facilities to secure the public drinking water supply and also constantly monitors the water supply to ensure the stability and safety of regional water resources, to prevent any adverse impacts. The impacts of installing the pipeline network are mitigated through offsetting measures and restoration after decommissioning of the mining sites.
RWE's work with other associations, such as the Erftverband, on the renaturation of the rivers Erft and Inde is also yielding good results. One river section in Neuss-Gnadenthal is now ranked as an excellent project in the context of the 'UN Decade on Ecosystem Restoration'. In 2024, RWE once again invited more than 130 guests to the conference on water management and mining damage to discuss and share experience on the topic.
In 2024, the Recultivation Research Center continued the biomonitoring of the newly established shallow water zone at the Inden opencast mine and documented promising results.
Working together with volunteer conservationists, teams from the Research Center are recording bird populations in the shallow water zone. The number of bird species identified there has risen to 60 , with 21 of these species listed on the Red List. Two-thirds of these species are migratory birds that use the area as a stopover, for example, when travelling from the Mediterranean to the North Sea.
The lake's shore area has minimal vegetation, making this open terrain particularly favourable for wading and water birds, as it allows them to better protect themselves from predators like foxes and birds of prey. Until its integration into the future opencast lake, the shallow water zone is an independent body of water covering an area of approximately six hectares that serves as a breeding ground and resting place for waterfowl.
In its rapidly growing renewable energy business, RWE has defined two-year biodiversity roadmaps for the most important operating companies (RWE Offshore and RWE Renewables Europe \& Australia) as part of its strategy. Due to a lack of current standardisation, pilot projects are specifically designed to yield information on measuring the impact on biodiversity as well as identify biodiversity enhancement potential around RWE sites. Project outcomes will also help us to accurately estimate the costs of measures to enhance biodiversity across our project portfolio.
Key actions include:
Early stage and development: RWE prioritises the selection of locations where we expect less impact on biodiversity. As part of ongoing Environmental Impact Assessments (EIA) and permitting procedures for new assets, we conduct detailed environmental studies and engage in stakeholder dialogue as well as fielding investigations to ensure that stakeholder views and concerns are taken into account. Moreover, RWE undertakes not to become active in voluntary exclusion zones around UNESCO World Heritage Sites and other sensitive areas such as strict nature conservation and wilderness areas in accordance with the classification of the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN).
Construction: RWE continues to test innovative measures to reduce the impact of new construction. One example is the three-year "SeaMe" research project which commenced in 2024 in collaboration with German research partners at RWE's operational offshore wind farm Kaskasi. The project aims to enhance the understanding of interactions between offshore wind farms and marine ecosystems using advanced monitoring technologies such as environmental DNA sampling, drones and autonomous underwater vehicles equipped with AI-based cameras. Integrating these innovative techniques allows for a more holistic approach to data collection, which goes beyond monitoring of individual groups of organisms and makes monitoring less invasive compared to traditional means of sampling fish using nets. If successful, these innovative monitoring methods can be used at any time during the asset life cycle including construction. During the construction phase of projects, RWE also continues to engage with stakeholders to consider their perspectives related to impacts on habitats and species, and to provide information on suitable measures.
RWE is carrying out a biodiversity restoration programme to enhance the wellbeing of pollinators at four onshore wind farms in the UK and Ireland. The project is a collaboration with the UK Bumblebee Conservation Trust. It seeks to enhance local ecosystems and support declining pollinator populations. In 2024, a team of volunteers planted a variety of wildflowers and shrubs at the Brechfa Forest Wind Farm in Wales. At all sites, our efforts have a positive impact on the local environment and help bees and other pollinators to thrive.
RWE is pursuing another effective approach to limiting land consumption: dual utilisation. For example, PV projects have been developed for agriculture, i.e. solar panels are installed on land that is still used for growing crops. These dual-use projects offer a good opportunity to tackle two of the most pressing environmental problems: the loss of biodiversity through land use and climate change.
Relevant potential impacts on biodiversity are concentrated at lignite mining sites and renewable assets under construction. The construction phase for renewables was found to have the largest potential biodiversity impact. Taking into account the significant impacts identified in lignite mining and the construction of new renewable assets, 109 locations were considered. The results show that 102 of these sites are close to protected areas or to Key Biodiversity Areas. A distance of 50 kilometres was used as the basis for the analysis for all opencast lignite mines, while a distance of 20 kilometres was taken into account for solar plants, storage facilities, onshore and offshore wind farms and battery storage assets under construction. We have made conservative assumptions with regard to these buffer zones.
This helps us to understand the interactions between project construction and important biodiversity areas. At the same time, we are working on defining metrics to assess the impact of our business activities on biodiversity.
The table on the next page provides an overview of the total number of RWE mining sites as well as the sites where we are constructing renewable energy assets and the number of those that are located in proximity to protected or Key Biodiversity Areas. However, this exposure does not automatically imply a negative impact on biodiversity. As an energy company, RWE operates in a highly regulated sector and is required to obtain permits, which are mandatory for the operation of all assets and which include Environmental Impact Assessments (EIAs) as part of the process. Potential impacts are therefore assessed, and mitigation measures implemented, as part of the EIAs. Above and beyond the EIA criteria, further analyses are required to assess the specific effects of RWE's business activities on the flora and fauna within Key Biodiversity Areas and protected areas at each individual site, and we aim to make progress with such analyses in the years ahead.
Additionally, the table shows the corresponding area of sites in hectares of land used or sea-areas used, and the responsible authorities. The figures are reported on a gross basis, accounting for $100 \%$ of areas regardless of RWE's ownership share in line with the operational control principle. Sites are aggregated and clustered based on technology, geographical region and terrestrial or marine location. We consider the land use or areas as a relevant indicator and suitable basis to better analyse our material impacts in lignite mining and the construction of renewable energy facilities.
The methodology we chose to delineate areas of activity in the vicinity of Key Biodiversity Areas and protected areas was based on the following criteria:
| Material sites | Key Biodiversity Areas |
Protected areas | Area of sites (in hectares) |
Business activity | Potential impact | Responsible authority |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lignite (Phaseout Technologies) - Germany | 10,430 | |||||
| Garzweiler, Hombach, Inden | 3 | 3 | 10,430 | Lignite mining | Temporary land-use change; temporary fresh water use change; land degradation |
Office of Mining NRW Arnsberg; Federal or national ministry or agency |
| Renewables - offshore wind (under construction) | 59,321 | |||||
| UK | 0 | 1 | 59,321 | Wind power generation - offshore | Marine use change; habitat loss, species loss or change in ecosystem services | Secretary of State, Marine Management Organisation (MMO) |
| Renewables - onshore wind (under construction) | 14 | |||||
| Germany | 0 | 1 | 1 | Wind power generation - onshore | Land-use change; habitat loss, species loss or change in ecosystem services | State Office for the Environment, North Rhine-Westphalia State Office for the Environment, Lower Saxony National Planning Inspectorate, Scottish Government's Energy Consents Unit, East Ayrshire Council US Fish and Wildlife Services (USFWS), US Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA) |
| UK | 1 | 3 | 5 | |||
| US | 0 | 1 | 3 | |||
| Other | 1 | 8 | 5 | |||
| Renewables - onshore solar (under construction) | 9,617 | |||||
| UK | 2 | 7 | 275 | Solar power generation | Land-use change; habitat loss, species loss or change in ecosystem services | City Planning Office, Berlin Building Inspectorate, Hamburg National Planning Inspectorate, Stratford on Avon District Council, Warwick District Council USFWS, US EPA, USACE Department of Environmental Protection/ Conservation, Department of Transportation, Public Service Commission County planning and zoning commissions, county building departments |
| US | 3 | 15 | 8,871 | |||
| Other | 42 | 63 | 471 |
To monitor our potential impacts on temporary land-use change from lignite mining, we disclose the area of land currently used by RWE for its business operations in the Rhenish lignite area. It should be noted that the legal framework establishes an obligation to restore the land used in its entirety after completion of the mining activities. The opencast mining pits remaining after recultivation will be transformed into lakes, in accordance with the decision of the state government.
| Land-use change metrics in RWE's phaseout technology lignite mining |
Unit | 2024 |
|---|---|---|
| Land used $^{1}$ | hectares | 10,430 |
In relation to potential impacts on temporary freshwater-use change due to groundwater extraction and diversion for lignite mining, we disclose the amount of water extracted and the amount of water discharged into water bodies. In the lignite mining area, we mainly extract groundwater from the mining areas, where operations require a lower water table and discharge almost all of this water back into nearby rivers or lakes. The water consumption (the difference between input and output) amounts to only $2 \%$ of the water extracted, mainly since we use a small portion of the groundwater as cooling water for our power stations, which evaporates into the air.
| Freshwater-use change metrics in the opencast lignite mines |
Unit | Input (2024) |
Output (2024) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Groundwater | million $\mathrm{m}^{3}$ | 452.5 | n.a. |
| Surface water | million $\mathrm{m}^{3}$ | 23.9 | 443.1 |
| Water from third parties/ water discharged to third parties |
million $\mathrm{m}^{3}$ | 0.2 | 24.3 |
| Total | million $\mathrm{m}^{3}$ | $\mathbf{4 7 6 . 6}$ | $\mathbf{4 6 7 . 3}$ |
To determine the area of land used and recultivated, RWE utilises image measurement flights and photogrammetric evaluations. The data only include the actual areas used, with no extrapolation or forecasts. RWE considers an area to be recultivated, for example, when it has been replanted (forestry recultivation) or when the area can be planted after the loess layer has been applied. Land used is defined as the area utilised for lignite mining. The reported data is verified by a local supervisory authority.
The amount of water extracted and water discharged is measured for each opencast mine, mainly by individual metering. The sum of the individual amounts is then checked for plausibility and entered into RWE's internal data collection tool as a consolidated metric. The opencast mines included in the data are Garzweiler, Hambach and Inden. The reported data is verified externally by the LANUV, the district governments of Cologne, Arnsberg and Düsseldorf, the Erftverband and / or the local water authority of the city of Düren, depending on jurisdiction and approval notice.
The global economy has traditionally relied on a system that constantly requires new natural resources. This model and the growing population are putting a strain on the availability of these resources. By taking measures to reuse and recycle materials, we can significantly reduce our dependence on new raw materials, thereby reducing the impact on the environment and counteracting the scarcity of resources in the long term.
In response to the growing challenge of limited natural resources, the circular economy is also becoming an increasingly important strategic sustainability issue for RWE due to our ongoing need for resources.
By incorporating the principles of the circular economy, we intend to reduce resource depletion and waste generation, while also leveraging a mechanism that simultaneously helps us to lower Scope 3 emissions related to the procurement of goods (see page 122). In addition, circular economy measures, particularly in our upstream value chain, help to stem the loss of biodiversity (see pages 135 et seqq.).
As RWE presses forward with its Growing Green strategy, it needs substantial quantities of materials, mainly concrete, steel, glass, polysilicon, copper, aluminium and critical raw materials for the construction, repowering or conversion of assets such as offshore wind, onshore wind and solar forms, battery storage facilities, electrolysers and gas-fired power plants. Thus, resource use for the construction of assets is a material value chain aspect in RWE's Renewables and Flexible Generation businesses. As there is no significant construction activity in the Phaseout Technologies segment, resource use is not a material aspect in this business segment. 'E1 Climate change - energy consumption' includes a comprehensive presentation of the fuels we use; thus, we do not further consider such as inflow materials.
The operation of large power stations, in particular combustion plants which use solid fuels, generates waste. Large quantities of waste can also be generated in our Renewables business, especially during the construction phase, as well as when dismantling older wind forms. Consequently, waste management is a material aspect that is mainly driven by large power plant assets in RWE's Phaseout Technologies segment (lignite) and the Flexible Generation business (hard coal, biomass and gas). However, waste management also has increasing relevance in the field of renewables.
RWE's material impacts, as summarised in the table below, were assessed as part of RWE's double materiality assessment (see pages 84 et seqq.). No material risks and opportunities were identified beyond the provisions for decommissioning wind and solar assets already accounted for on the balance sheet. Nevertheless, RWE recognises general risks including price volatility, possible supply chain disruptions and potential fines due to evolving legislation.
E5 Resource use and circular economy
Resource use for the construction of assets
(actual negative impact, own operations and value chain)
Waste management
(actual negative impact, own operations and value chain)
RWE recognises the importance of transitioning to a circular economy. We have set a goal to increase the recovery rate in our core business to over $90 \%$ by 2030 (see page 149). This target is monitored by the Strategy \& Sustainability department and progress is regularly reported to the Executive Board.
We have also investigated other inflow-related targets in some business segments. Due to our supply chain dependency and the still-limited availability of recycled or recyclable materials on a larger scale as well as the profitability of these actions, we expect to develop suitable inflow targets in the coming years.
| Business segment | Target | Baseline year 2023 | Layer of waste hierarchy |
|---|---|---|---|
| RWE core business | Increase recovery rate' to over $90 \%$ by 2030 | Recovery rate of $83 \%$ | Preparing for re-use; recycling; other recovery |
1 See page 149.
RWE has put a policy in place for the circular economy and aims to reach circularity by 2050. At the core of this policy is RWE's circularity framework, which highlights three core circular principles:
To bring these three circular principles to life, we have identified three circularity enablers, as further parts of the framework, namely
The implementation of RWE's circular economy policy is overseen by the Head of Strategy \& Sustainability. Every Group company with considerable waste streams in RWE's core business is expected to produce a goal-orientated roadmap for circularity which contains specific actions and measurements to increase the recovery rate between now and 2030.
We generally follow the waste hierarchy for our waste, i.e. ideally we avoid waste, reuse it or recycle it. Only when this is not possible are the remaining options of incineration or landfill considered.
Our policy and approach connects the understanding and measures regarding inflows and outflows to reduce resource use, minimise waste and foster circularity of materials. This starts with the design of assets in collaboration with partners to ensure that materials can be recycled more easily (see page 144).
Some identified measures regarding inflows also simultaneously function as levers to reduce our emissions in the upstream supply chain and thus contribute to our climate goals (see pages 122 et seqq.).
Roles and responsibilities in relation to waste are clearly allocated in our operational companies as an integral part of the environmental management system and organisation. Specifically for large power plants, there are legally required designated waste officers in several business areas. In all other business areas, waste management roles are clearly allocated at each site, often in combination with HSE advisors (Health, Safety \& Environment). Depending on the business area, the environmental organisation ensures that measures are formulated and implemented and that monitoring and internal reporting is carried out via the Sustainability department.
To monitor the effectiveness of its policies, RWE collects mainly waste data as well as inflow- and market-related data in specific initiatives in order to better understand the feasibility of potential action fields and measures. By doing so, we aim to gradually increase the quality of our data on the subject of circularity.
RWE's assets are designed for longevity, typically targeting a service life of at least 30 years for wind and solar assets, with recent industry trends extending this to beyond 35 years. Good maintenance also helps to extend the service life of our assets. For example, some of our hydro assets have been in operation for 70 years or more.
To further operationalise its three core circularity principles outlined earlier, RWE has launched a series of actions and pilot projects, in addition to successfully implementing measures. These pilot projects aim to test the feasibility and scalability of various circularity measures. In the year under review, the initiatives primarily focused on reducing inflows of raw materials by increasing the refurbishment and repair of components. Some measures are also intended to improve the recovery or recycling of components and materials, in order to reduce disposal or incineration. These actions are generally undertaken without a dedicated budget specifically for circularity, but are instead considered within the allocated project budget.
To address resource use for the construction and operation of assets, particularly the use of raw materials, we seek to avoid inflows by reusing components or using refurbished components. We also explore options to gradually increase the share of circular materials in our inflows with recycled materials. For all approaches and initiatives, feasibility, scalability and alignment with economic efficiency are prerequisites.
To this end, we form and maintain partnerships with relevant suppliers to jointly work on circularity levers and, depending on the component, we actively look for suppliers with dedicated circular business models. Circularity is also anchored in our supplier prequalification criteria and is part of our general process for supplier selection and management (see page 144).
Our US renewables business initiated a pilot project in 2024 to test the performance characteristics of a high-efficiency metal-hydrogen battery. The company EnerVenue is pioneering the commercial deployment of high-efficiency metal-hydrogen batteries designed to exceed a 30,000-cycle life and with better recyclability than lithium-ion. The project will be continued in 2025 to investigate the possible use of the technology.
In 2024, we completed a project in the USA to optimise foundations for onshore wind forms. RWE has designed and tested optimised foundations that require less concrete and steel compared to conventional foundations. In the next step, we plan to use the optimised foundations for all of our newly constructed wind farms in the USA.
In its operations and maintenance processes for onshore wind and solar assets, RWE was able to use refurbished components for more than $50 \%$ of the components requiring replacement in 2024. This included components such as blades, transformers, wind sensors, yaw gears, motors, brake calipers, inverters, circuit boards and circuit breakers.
If lifetime extension is not possible and an asset or component must be disposed of, RWE strives to minimise the end-of-life treatment of waste materials, aiming to gradually further reduce the incineration of waste or disposal in landfills.
In general, wind assets achieve a high recovery rate, mainly in relation to steel and concrete. Only rotor blades still present a challenge due to the composite material. For its existing fleet, RWE is testing out various options. To date, very few environmentally friendly, industrywide scalable technologies are available on the market for the repurposing or recovery of wind turbine blades made of conventional composites. Innovative solutions are required to reduce future landfill and ultimately achieve our circular economy targets. Along with other initiatives for the recycling of conventional blades, for example in the production of gypsum or road construction, RWE has joined the BladeReUse project led by the Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT), which aims to develop a method to repurpose rotor blade parts in the construction industry to lower $\mathrm{CO}_{2}$ emissions and resource use. The project started in October 2023 and is expected to deliver the first noise barriers made from blades by the end of 2026.
To foster further development in recycling wind turbines, in 2021 RWE began piloting the use of recyclable blades developed by Siemens Gamesa. These blades utilise a new type of resin that allows for efficient separation and reuse in various applications, such as in the automotive industry or consumer goods. Following successful testing on three turbines at the Kaskasi offshore wind farm in 2022, RWE installed recyclable blades on 44 of the 100 turbines at its Sofia offshore wind project in 2023. If the tests are successful, RWE plans to use recyclable rotor blades in new construction projects. At the Thor offshore wind farm (Denmark), which is currently being constructed, we will use recyclable rotor blades and, in addition, half of the turbines are to be built with towers made of more environmentally friendly steel.
RWE is working on better recycling processes for solar modules in the USA. In collaboration with the technology-based solar module recycling company Solarcycle, we are testing new processes to extract and reuse the majority of materials in a solar module, including aluminium, silver, silicon and glass. The company feeds this material back into the supply chain to promote domestic solar production and drive the circular economy worldwide. In 2024, Solarcycle and RWE entered into a partnership for the recycling of solar modules for the Alamo 7 project, and we plan to continue this partnership in 2025.
In the Phaseout Technologies business, the dismantling of plants continued during the year. Activities in the reporting period took place at several locations in Germany. Almost all of the buildings at the former power plant site in Voerde are currently being demolished, while a recently acquired site in Lingen is being prepared for further use by dismantling former production facilities. Additional dismantling activities are taking place at the Gerstein plant and at our power plant in Dortmund. Dismantling is progressing steadily at all RWE nuclear energy sites, including at Emsland, which was closed in 2023 and was our last nuclear power plant in operation. For example, the cooling towers of the former nuclear power plant in Biblis were demolished in the reporting year.
In Gundremmingen, we have begun dismantling cooling towers B and C of the former nuclear power plant. All of the projects are achieving recycling rates of more than $90 \%$. Additional dismantling projects are planned and RWE is exploring other sustainability options, in order to further increase the proportion of reused or recycled material.
In the past and whenever profitable, we have tried to resell components and materials, such as steel, on secondary markets or in some cases even entire machines or parts of power plants. Resold materials and components for external recovery as well as reused components are considered in the recovery rate for the core business (see page 149).
We use initial metrics that represent standard indicators of the circular economy. These are especially useful for understanding the status quo and tracking our progress over the years. They are also particularly helpful for identifying potential for improvement and retrospectively quantifying the improvements that have been achieved.
In accordance with the identified impacts, risks and opportunities (IROs), we estimate the total weight of relevant materials associated with our new-build facilities. As the proportion of biological materials is minimal, we consider all of them to be technical materials. The main input materials associated with investments in RWE's Renewables business are steel and concrete, for wind turbines, and glass for PV panels. In our flexible generation business, the main material inflows in 2024 were concrete for construction work, steel for equipment such as electrolysers and for large spare parts (e.g. turbine components), as well as a significant share of battery chemicals and non-ferrous metals (e.g. aluminium and copper) for large battery storage systems.
| Metrics resource inflows | Unit | 2024 |
|---|---|---|
| Total weight of products | metric tons | 1,295,769 |
| - of which: concrete | metric tons | 781,525 |
| - of which: ferrous metal (mainly steel) | metric tons | 377,512 |
| - of which: glass | metric tons | 80,194 |
| - of which: non-ferrous metal (mainly aluminium, copper) | metric tons | 25,424 |
Based mainly on general statistics and partly on data from suppliers and lifecycle analyses, we derived estimates for the share of recycled materials in our key inflow materials categorised into the three groups ferrous metals (steel, etc.), non-ferrous metals (copper, aluminium, etc.) and concrete.
For ferrous metals, particularly steel, we assume a $29 \%$ recycled content, based on lifecycle assessments and existing supplier data. For non-ferrous metals, including copper and aluminium, recycled and virgin materials are processed separately; however, based on global averages, we adopt a $20 \%$ recycled feedstock share, including metals used in battery components. For glass, we estimate a $20 \%$ recycled share, supported by emissions data and the energy-saving benefits of incorporating recycled cullet in production.
| Metrics of secondary materials used | Unit | 2024 |
|---|---|---|
| Absolute weight of secondary materials used | metric tons | 130,602 |
| Percentage of secondary materials used | $\%$ | 10 |
RWE records the volume of all waste, broken down by type of recycling and type of disposal, as shown in the table on the following page. The waste figures cover the same scope as the financial report and include all consolidated units with significant waste streams.
With regard to ash from lignite-fired power generation, which accounts for $61 \%$ of total waste volumes, RWE is obliged to utilise these volumes internally as part of its land recultivation at former opencast lignite mines. In 2024, the waste generated mainly consisted of slag, fly ash and filter dust from combustion as well as soil and stone from demolition. The Flexible Generation segment mainly produced slag, fly ash and calcium chloride from regular operations.
In the Renewables business, the most important waste materials were: soil, stones and concrete (both for new construction and for repowering and dismantling), municipal waste from the construction of solar plants and recyclable metals from the construction of wind farms.

To advance circularity and reduce waste, RWE started to monitor its progress in material recovery by introducing a recovery rate indicator. The current target is to achieve a $90 \%$ recovery rate in RWE's core business by 2030. In 2024, a recovery rate of $88.3 \%$ was achieved.
| Recovery rate | Unit | Target (2030) | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Recovery rate of core business | $\%$ | 90.0 | 88.3 |
The resource inflow data was estimated based on an existing categorisation of material and product groups. The estimation was conducted for large components for new builds and overhauls in RWE's Renewables and Flexible Generation businesses covering at least $80 \%$ of relevant material and product groups. The data estimation is not separately validated by an external organisation.
Waste data is collected based on weighted volumes by all of RWE's companies and then aggregated at the Group level. In cases where data is not available or insufficient, particularly due to data availability constraints from contractors, RWE uses the best available as-is data for the reporting year due to the difficulty of making accurate estimations for waste data.
The category 'other recovery operations' represents the largest share of waste diverted from disposal. This category includes all recovery operations that are not explicitly preparation for reuse or recycling. The category 'other disposal operations' also contains the largest share of waste directed to disposal. RWE is working with its waste experts in the various business units to gradually improve the allocation to the sub-categories and increase the granularity of the data reported. For this report, waste data is reported to the relevant authorities in accordance with legal requirements and aggregated at the Group level.
The recovery rate applies to our core business and does not include Phaseout Technologies. The share of materials in percent is calculated from the overall volume of outflows in our core business which is not disposed of. The total amount of outflows includes all types of waste as included in the table above. Additionally, it includes scrap, by-products, as well as materials and components for reuse.
Waste data is reported to local authorities if required, but are not separately validated by an external body.
At RWE, our people are at the heart of everything we do. Ensuring the best possible working conditions for our employees is therefore our utmost priority and an integral part of our business model. This is also reflected in RWE's internal standards, which are based on fundamental international standards and human rights principles. As a company, we strive to position RWE as an employer of choice for those who want to help shape the energy transition.
Health and safety (H\&S) is of crucial importance for RWE's business in order to create a safe, supportive working environment at all locations. The well-being of employees and contractors is paramount in this regard. Furthermore, RWE is committed to fair and appropriate remuneration, which is often above the market rate. RWE also aims to promote new ways of working, for example by offering flexible hours and remote work options, particularly for employees in administrative roles. The company promotes social dialogue through open communication with employee representatives and groups, in line with RWE's overarching sustainability goals.
RWE operates globally, with most of the workforce employed in Germany, the Netherlands and the United Kingdom, as well as in the United States.
Good working conditions coupled with a diverse range of attractive benefits ensure that RWE achieves its goal of being an attractive employer.
RWE's material impacts, as summarised in the table below, were assessed as part of RWE's double materiality assessment (see pages 84 et seqq.). In accordance with this assessment, RWE has identified working conditions for our own workforce with all related sub-topics as material sustainability matters with mostly positive impacts.
| Material IROs S1 - Own workforce |
|
|---|---|
| Health and safety | |
| Physical work (potential negative impact, own operations) | |
| Secure employment | |
| Creation of secure jobs in the renewable energy sector (actual positive impact, own operations) | |
| Working time | |
| Flexible working hours (actual positive impact, own operations) | |
| Adequate wages | |
| Positive level of wages paid (actual positive impact, own operations) | |
| Social dialogue | |
| Employee feedback mechanisms (actual positive impact, own operations) | |
| Freedom of association, the existence of works councils and the information, consultation and participation rights of workers | |
| Strong works council representation (actual positive impact, own operations) | |
| Collective bargaining, including rate of workers covered by collective agreements | |
| Collective bargaining agreements (actual positive impact, own operations) | |
| Work-life balance | |
| Flexible working time and family-related leave (actual positive impact, own operations) |
Our employees perform activities during the construction, operation and dismantling of our plants that may be associated with health risks. Working at height, handling heavy loads, movable parts on systems or components and high-voltage connections are examples of the potential hazards to which RWE employees may be exposed during their working hours. If handled improperly, these risks can lead to serious, sometimes long-term injuries or even death. We endeavour to avoid this through our occupational health and safety management system (see page 152).
RWE is well known and appreciated for its favourable working conditions. This is reflected in high standards for fair wages, working hours, social dialogue, collective bargaining arrangements, freedom of association and work-life balance.
The expansion and development of generation technologies from renewable sources creates new, secure jobs and thus opportunities that open up positive further development options for current and future RWE employees.
Beyond extensive construction and expansion in renewables, our phaseout and decommissioning efforts in conventional energy generation also play a crucial part within the context of the energy transition. Assets that in many instances have been operated for decades have already been or will have to be closed down, which in turn affects our workforce. RWE wants to ensure this transition is socially acceptable and considers the perspectives of the affected stakeholders.
RWE maintains a zero-tolerance policy toward forced labour and child labour in its own operations. This corresponds with RWE's values, commitment and self-understanding, but also with the robust regulatory frameworks in the countries in which we operate.
In business and industry, employee satisfaction and commitment are often expressed using the engagement index, which serves as an indicator of working conditions. Among other things, it offers valuable insights into how committed employees are to the company and serves as a basis for developing initiatives. RWE has set itself a Group-wide target of $80 \%$ for the engagement index. This indicator is part of the sustainability-linked Executive Board remuneration (see pages 97 et seqq.) and includes an annual survey, in which employees can express their level of satisfaction. The engagement index is calculated as the percentage of all employee responses that answer the commitment-related questions with 'strongly agree' and 'agree'. RWE achieved an engagement index of $87 \%$ in 2024, surpassing the already very ambitious target of $80 \%$. We aim to continue to exceed this already high benchmark in the future. The Executive Board of RWE AG is notified of the annual results. Following the employee survey, targeted improvement initiatives are derived for individual team where necessary, based on the results. The Supervisory Board assesses target achievement, reviews the targets annually and determines the goals for the following year.
RWE upholds the principle that 'All accidents are preventable' and is committed to safeguarding and promoting the health of its employees. Occupational safety measures are continuously developed and improved to this end. This process is managed with the help of key figures, in particular the LTIF (Lost Time Injury Frequency). The LTIF is an internationally recognised and industry-wide indicator that measures the frequency of accidents, i.e. the number of accidents in relation to the number of hours worked. For fiscal 2024, RWE aims to prevent fatal accidents and achieve an LTIF of 1.8 accidents per million hours worked for our own employees and for employees of partner companies at our sites. Both targets form part of the Executive Board remuneration (see pages 97 et seqq.). This is linked to target values for the individual RWE Group companies, which are agreed between the Executive Board of RWE AG and the Executive Boards of the Group companies and then confirmed with the Supervisory Board for the following year.
In feedback meetings ('Partner Company Days'), our partners are informed about occupational health and safety performance in comparison with the targets, findings or improvements and planned programmes or initiatives relating to occupational health and safety. Workers in the value chain (or their representatives) are not directly involved in setting and pursuing the targets.
One indicator to indirectly assess whether employees have a solid understanding of RWE's principles is the proportion of managers who take part in the survey on compliance violations. RWE has set its annual Group-wide target for the 'response rate of the management survey' at $100 \%$. The survey is sent to all employees classified as managers on 31 October. The survey was conducted on 7 January for the previous fiscal year. This KPI is embedded in the sustainability-linked Board remuneration (see pages 97 et seqq.) as the 'response rate of the management survey on compliance', which successfully achieved the targeted $100 \%$ response rate for 2024. This target implies that full participation is maintained at the highest level. The Executive Board of RWE AG is informed of the results every year. The Supervisory Board assesses target achievement, reviews the targets annually and determines the goals for the following year.
All targets in this context are set for one year. Most targets are plateau targets to maintain the achieved good or very good levels. Unless otherwise indicated, the targets were established independently of specific methodologies or assumptions. For own employees, regular exchanges with works councils assure the involvement of this stakeholder group and its perspectives.
RWE is committed to ensuring an optimal and safe working environment for our workforce. This chapter provides an overview of the policies and approaches that sustain our commitment to being a responsible employer and thus continue to drive positive outcomes for our workforce and the organisation. The core of our approach is the RWE Code of Conduct, which lays the foundation for responsible operations based on principles such as honesty, respect and accountability. No employee or job applicant should be discriminated against based on gender, marital status, ethnic background, nationality, age, etc. We are committed to equal opportunities and diversity. There are no mandatory policies with regard to inclusion or support measures in favour of underrepresented groups in the company's own workforce. Procedures that help to prevent discrimination include established complaints processes, awareness-raising measures and actively addressing applicants in job advertisements.
The Code of Conduct has been managed by our Compliance department since 2005 and ensures that both RWE and its employees operate in accordance with legal and ethical standards. The Code is enforced throughout our operations based on a systematic approach that emphasises personal responsibility and compliance with legal standards; it is also supported by the Policy Statement on Human Rights.
With regard to working conditions, RWE is committed to creating a workplace that supports professional development and personal well-being. This is mirrored in the corresponding statutory regulations and a wide range of agreements (collective labour agreements, works agreements, employment contracts, etc.), which cover a diverse array of essential elements
of working conditions, including, for example, secure employment, remuneration, working hours, social dialogue, work-life balance, etc. Relevant principles are defined in the RWE Social Charter, which was developed in cooperation with the European Works Council and is valid for the employees in Europe.
With the support of the individual HR departments, RWE's Chief Human Resources Officer (CHO) and the corresponding Executive Board members of the Group companies ensure that these commitments are met through a collaborative process with employee representatives. The Social Charter supports social dialogue and transparency in employee relations, and articulates the rights and responsibilities of employees and management. Furthermore, possible working arrangements include mechanisms that foster a good work-life balance and accommodate employees' diverse needs, including flexible working time and enabling family-oriented leave.
RWE offers a large number of permanent employment contracts that are protected by statutory, collectively agreed or contractual employment protection regulations. RWE endeavours to provide employees from discontinued business units with new qualifications that allow them to move to other business units and access new opportunities.
RWE recognises the importance of structured working hours in fostering employee health, productivity and personal well-being. Employees' working hours are governed by laws, collective agreements and other labour law principles. Our shift models and shift schedules are designed to minimise disruption for employee. Flexible work arrangements may be offered to accommodate personal and family needs, which are crucial in supporting employee satisfaction and engagement.
Ensuring fair remuneration for all employees is a cornerstone of RWE's HR policy. We are committed to paying fair wages in accordance with collective labour agreements and statutory standards. In many cases, employees receive higher wages than the minimum wages defined by the EU or national legislation. RWE also offers employees numerous other additional benefits.
RWE actively supports collective bargaining and facilitates social dialogue through institutional frameworks such as works councils and union representation, which are institutionalised particularly in Germany, the UK, the Netherlands and other European countries. Our policies promote the creation of environments conducive to dialogue between management and employees, ensuring that workers' representatives are involved in discussions on employment-related issues before decisions are finalised. This approach not only solidifies trust but also enhances workplace transparency, leading to the more effective management of employee relations (see also next section on engagement with own workforce).
RWE upholds the right to freedom of association and collective bargaining, and ensures no interference in union formation or functioning. Our policies guarantee that employees can freely associate, establish unions and collectively engage in bargaining without fear of disadvantages. We provide facilities and protections for workers' representatives, reinforcing our commitment to fair representation and good social dialogue. Employees can openly and regularly exchange views on working conditions with management or in the long-standing workers' representative bodies and unions. RWE finds local solutions that take into account the relevant national legislation and specific guidelines and situations. RWE works together with employees and trade unions and has created dedicated roles in the organisation for this purpose.
Our commitment to respecting human rights is set out in our Code of Conduct, in our Policy Statement on Human Rights and in a comprehensive Human Rights Risk Management System for Human Rights (HRRMS), which is based on national laws and international standards.
With regard to RWE's supply chain, respecting and safeguarding human rights is important. A comprehensive description of our human rights strategy and our approach, which also applies to RWE's own workforce, can be found in the chapter 'Workers in the value chain'.
Health and safety (H\&S), as a core component of working conditions, is a top priority for RWE. We attach great importance to health and safety in the workplace. The Chief Human Resources Officer (CHRO), who also acts as the Labour Director on the Executive Board of RWE AG, is responsible for the Group-wide coordination and assessment of health and safety. The Executive Board members and managing directors of the Group companies ensure the implementation of and compliance with legal regulations in health and safety as well as alignment with the Group's H\&S targets ('operational responsibility'). Each Group company designates an Executive Board member or a managing director to oversee H\&S. This does not affect the overall responsibility of all Executive Board members or managing directors.
The 'Health and Safety' Group Directive serves to organise and safeguard standards within the RWE Group companies. It outlines core criteria for the health and safety policy, the organisational framework and procedural structure in health and safety, and H\&S targets. In addition, it establishes Group initiatives, programmes and standards, as well as uniform, Group-wide terminology and overarching regulations for health and safety and for the health and safety management system. Each Group company has established a health and safety management system that is used for systematic monitoring and continuous improvement in accordance with the Plan-Do-Check-Act cycle. Certifications such as
ISO 45001 are recommended to the Group companies in order to further strengthen the integrity of the health and safety management systems.
The RWE Group uses IT systems to report, analyse and manage safety-related observations, incidents and accidents. These systems are designed to ensure that appropriate preventive measures are taken immediately in response to risk-based observations, incidents and accidents at work. In addition, RWE's International Health Standard (IHS) defines a baseline of health-related products and services that must be made available to every RWE employee worldwide. Where necessary, the Group companies may offer their employees additional health-related services over and above those specified in the IHS. RWE promotes preventative healthcare for all employees with comprehensive programmes addressing physical, mental and social well-being of employees in conjunction with evolving, tailormade initiatives.
In Germany, the Works Constitution Act (Betriebsverfassungsgesetz, BetrVG) regulates the comprehensive information, consultation and co-determination rights of the Works Council, providing a foundation for a trusting relationship between executive management and the Works Council. In addition to the Group Works Council and the European Works Council, the company supports various forms of employee representation at both corporate and operational levels. These include spokesperson committees, representative bodies for employees with disabilities, and youth and apprentice representation. In the event of changes within the company, RWE meets all its obligations to inform and involve employee representatives early on. The Director of Human Resources is responsible for maintaining dialogue with employee representatives. This takes place several times a year in the form of consultations with the elected members of the Works Council. Agreements are usually concluded and documented via collective labour agreements or works agreements. The regulations are published on the intranet and can be viewed at any time. They are also communicated to employees at works meetings, for example.
Once a year, RWE gauges employee satisfaction through a Group-wide survey, the results of which are documented and analysed.
At RWE, several underrepresented employee groups are organised in networks that are generally open to all our employees. These networks include the women's network, networks for people with disabilities and young employees. RWE relies on these networks to gain insights into its workforce's perspectives, particularly to better understand the needs of those who may face potential disadvantages. Our Human Rights Risk Management System (HRRMS) helps us with implementation and provides support through relevant HR guidelines, principles and trainings.
As part of the transition to a more environmentally friendly, climate-neutral business, measures have been taken to mitigate negative impact on employees. While new employees are being recruited for growth areas, the necessary decommissioning measures in connection with the phaseout of nuclear and coal-fired generation have led to a reduction in jobs and staff. RWE strives to manage this transition in a socially responsible manner by committing in a collective labour agreement to transfer employees from good jobs to good jobs and to qualify them for this transition in advance where necessary. For older employees, offers are available such as the adjustment allowance scheme and the partial retirement scheme, allowing early retirement and thus an early pension.
Employees have the opportunity to report legal violations through our whistleblowing system. Confidentiality ensures the anonymity of whistleblowers. In the event of suspected or actual legal breaches, employees can notify compliance officers via a web-based whistleblowing system. This system has proven effective as evidenced by the growing confidence of employees in using it to report grievances.
RWE ensures the prompt and appropriate follow-up of all complaints with standardised checks to confirm whether these are verified cases of potential compliance violations.
RWE maintains the highest level of confidentiality in processing complaints, protecting the identity of whistleblowers and considering the interests of those affected by a report. Actions or omissions related to professional activities that result from a report or disclosure and may unjustly harm the whistleblower are not tolerated. A web-based system and alternative options, as well as orientation information on the intranet, ensure that reports can be made and further information provided. The information received is reviewed by the relevant departments within the Group. Reported cases are then investigated as part of a systematic follow-up process and remedial action is taken where appropriate. The process is subject to stringent confidentiality standards and personal data protection considerations, ensuring whistleblowers are systematically protected. Based on the rising number of reports received in recent years, we can conclude that the employees are aware of this procedure and utilise it.
To uphold compliance, the Compliance department conducts regular audits and systematically follows up on reports of violations. If legal breaches are confirmed, appropriate legal action may be taken as necessary. RWE AG's Internal Audit department regularly includes different sections of the Code of Conduct in its risk-oriented audit planning. If indications of violations are found at Group companies, remedial measures are agreed and monitored as part of a standardised process.
In 2024, RWE made moves to further optimise working conditions by pressing forward with a comprehensive and structured set of initiatives throughout the Group.
We want to achieve employee satisfaction through a variety of measures. Promoting a healthy balance between work and personal life is a fundamental aspect of RWE's approach to ensuring employee well-being. To this end, RWE offers flexible working hours and familyrelated leave. We support families and offer childcare facilities. In doing so, we foster a working environment where personal commitments and wishes are taken into account.
In relation to working time, RWE takes comprehensive preventative measures to ensure that appropriate rest periods, breaks and paid holidays are granted in accordance with the applicable laws and international standards. This helps us to promote a healthy worklife balance. In terms of compensation, in the period under review RWE continued to ensure that employees received adequate wages, aligned with statutory regulations and reflective of economic conditions and company performance. The high level of social dialogue was maintained through ongoing cooperation with staff and union representatives, integrating views from underrepresented groups to promote inclusive decision-making. RWE conducts an annual engagement survey to allow employees to give feedback on working conditions, with the results analysed to implement team-specific improvement actions. Alternatively, a short survey (pulse check) can be conducted, as in 2024.
In the year under review, RWE took numerous important measures to further improve health and safety throughout the company and ensure alignment with our strategic safety goals. Based on thorough risk assessments, incident analyses, audit results and overarching safety targets, each RWE Group company has adopted additional effective preventative measures, which are fundamentally geared towards ensuring sustainable, long-term health and safety.
In November 2024, for example, RWE organised its second annual Renewables Emergency Response Challenge (RESQ+) involving offshore rescue teams from a number of different countries. The main aim of the event was to further improve the first aid and rescue skills of the participants through realistic emergency scenarios. In addition, this initiative aimed to strengthen team collaboration, encourage the sharing of best practices, and provide a platform for better emergency preparedness across the organisation. All participating teams were given tasks that improved their technical skills and promoted cooperative learning within the Group. Another example of this approach is the Last Minute Risk Assessment (LMRA) in the Flexible Generation and Phaseout Technologies segments: aligned with industry best practices, it promotes collaboration between RWE and contractors to proactively identify and mitigate task-related risks before work begins.
Other measures include, in particular, the continued implementation of comprehensive prevention and relief initiatives, such as an employee support programme for emergency assistance and access to medical services. To promote a proactive approach to health and safety management, in addition to further developing self-learning tools for preventive measures and sharing monthly tips and ideas, we conduct return-to-work interviews following periods of incapacity, perform regular workplace inspections, assess fitness for work based on specific risk evaluations and provide targeted employee guidance from
health and safety experts. Another example is Flexible Generation: workplace stress factors were identified through the implementation of a newly harmonised assessment process. Following a comprehensive survey phase, managers discussed the results with their teams and derived specific improvement measures to reduce work-related risk factors in the long term. These efforts were complemented by launching the 'Calm Your Mind' programme. This focuses on stress management as a significant risk factor, emphasising the importance of employees' awareness of their mental health and encouraging open dialogue.
In order to strengthen the safety skills of managers, RWE continues to operate long-term prevention programmes specifically for managers: these ensure that important safety knowledge and skills are imparted throughout the company in order to strengthen the safety culture at all levels.
| Headcount of employees ${ }^{1}$ | Unit | 2024 |
|---|---|---|
| Total employees | number | 22,098 |
| of which: male | number | 17,498 |
| of which: female | number | 4,599 |
| of which: not specified | number | 1 |
| of which: not reported | number | 0 |
1 Gender as specified by the employee. In some countries, gender selection was only carried out by selecting male/female.
The number of employees is reported as at the end of the period under review and includes full-time and part-time employees including apprentices, but excluding Board members, managing directors, dormant employment relationships, working students and interns. For further information, please also see the FTE overview on page 51.
| Headcount by significant country | Unit | 2024 |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | number | $\mathbf{2 2 , 0 9 8}$ |
| of which: Germany | number | 14,470 |
| of which: United Kingdom | number | 3,197 |
| of which: other | number | 4,431 |
| Headcount by type of contract 2024 | Unit | Mole | Female | Not specified ${ }^{1}$ | Not reported | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total employees | number | 17,498 | 4,599 | 1 | 0 | 22,098 | |
| Permanent employees | 15,961 | 4,250 | 0 | 0 | 20,211 | ||
| Temporary employees ${ }^{2}$ | 1,537 | 349 | 1 | 0 | 1,887 |
1 In some countries, gender selection was only carried out by selecting mole/female.
2 The number of employees includes apprentices.
A threshold of $10 \%$ of RWE's total workforce, equating to 2,210 employees, served as a basis for assessing the relevant countries.
Permanent employees have an employment contract for an indefinite period. Temporary employees have an employment contract for a fixed term.
| Employee turnover ${ }^{1}$ | Unit | 2024 |
|---|---|---|
| Total number of employees who left the company | number | 965.3 |
| Employee turnover ${ }^{2}$ | $\%$ | 4.9 |
| Number of employees who voluntarily left the company | number | 419.5 |
| Voluntary employee turnover | $\%$ | 2.1 |
1 Based on FTE.
2 Turnover rate: total deportures (retirement, termination by employer, termination by employee, mutual termination of contract and other deportures, but excluding the end of fixed-term employment contracts and moves within the RWE Group in FTE).
Employee turnover is calculated as the number of permanent employees who have left the Group in relation to permanent employees. It represents the average of the last four quarterly end-of-period figures. The underlying FTE calculation for this KPI is defined by the number of full-time, part-time and temporary employees less the part-time reduction. Role transitions within the Group have not been considered. Also, dormant employment relationships and fluctuations such as exemptions are not included because the employee usually remains with the company and is released for various reasons. The Boards, managing directors, apprentices, working students/interns, and pre-pension part-time employees in the release phase are not considered.
The voluntary employee turnover of the RWE Group includes employees choosing to leave RWE of their own volition. This voluntary employee turnover rate stands at $2.1 \%$.
RWE discloses the coverage of collective agreements in the European Economic Area (EEA) if at least one collective agreement is applicable. RWE has established a European Works Council to cover the representation of workforce interests and has recorded this in an agreement.
The share of employees covered by collective bargaining agreements in EEA countries was $65 \%$ as of 31 December 2024.
Collective bargaining and social dialogue coverage by significant countries in the EEA for 2024
| Collective bargaining coverage | Social dialogue | |
|---|---|---|
| Coverage rate | Employees - EEA | Workplace representation (EEA) |
| $0-19 \%$ | - | - |
| $20-39 \%$ | - | - |
| $40-59 \%$ | - | - |
| $60-79 \%$ | Germany | Germany |
| $80-100 \%$ | - | - |
All RWE employees receive remuneration that at least corresponds to the statutory regulations in the respective countries. In many cases, however, remuneration is above these benchmarks and is regulated in collective agreements or other labour law principles. As at 31 December 2024, there were no employees who were not appropriately remunerated.
The following table shows metrics and indicators that relate either to RWE employees or to the employees of contractors. The only figures that include both RWE employees and employees of contractors working at the company's sites are the lost time injury frequency (LTIF) rate, which is also part of the sustainability-linked compensation for the Executive Board (see pages 97 et seqq.).
| Health and safety metrics | Unit | 2024 |
|---|---|---|
| Own workforce covered by health and safety management system | $\%$ | 100 |
| Fatal work-related accidents, employees ${ }^{1}$ | number | 0 |
| Recordable work-related accidents (TRI), employees | number | 153 |
| Recordable work-related accident rate, employees | $\%$ | 4.1 |
| Fatal work-related accidents - workers from contractors working on our sites | number | 0 |
| Lost Time Injury Frequency (LTIF) - RWE Group including workers from partner companies working on our sites | number | 1.6 |
In addition to the Lost Time Injury Frequency indicator, work-related fatalities also influence RWE's sustainability-linked Executive Board remuneration (see pages 97 et seqq.).
In addition to own employees, Lost Time Injury Frequency also contains employees from contractors on our sites.
With 0 fatal accidents involving either our own employees or contractor employees at our sites, RWE successfully achieved its target of 0 workplace fatalities. The LTIF result of 1.6 for 2024 is better than the target of 1.8. The Executive Board of RWE AG is informed of the annual results. The Supervisory Board assesses the achievement of objectives, reviews the targets annually and decides on the targets for the following year.
RWE has not identified any cases of severe human rights issues or incidents connected to its own workforce.
In 2024, RWE received 8 complaints from employees regarding work-related discrimination. As the complaints process is still being implemented and has not yet achieved full Groupwide coverage, it cannot be guaranteed that all discrimination complaints and incidents of discrimination were recorded.
The following table provides an overview of the cases of discrimination in the year under review.
| Reporting on discrimination and harassment | Unit | 2024 |
|---|---|---|
| Incidents of discrimination including harassment, reported in the reporting period | number | 7 |
| Complaints filed through channels for people in own workforce to raise concerns ${ }^{1}$ | number | 8 |
| Fines, penalties and compensation for damages as result of incidents of discrimination, including harassment and complaints filed | € | 0 |
[^0]
[^0]: 1 Complaints related to discrimination, harassment and other working conditions received via the web-based whistleblowing system, excluding already confirmed incidents of discrimination.
RWE's strategy and business model integrate human rights considerations with a focus on the upstream supply chain. Our operations rely on close collaboration with suppliers throughout every phase of the asset life cycle, making workers in the value chain essential to our business. Contractors and suppliers in the indirect supply chain not only enable our business operations but also serve as a key lever in implementing our Growing Green strategy. RWE's ambition is to uphold and respect international human rights and labour rights across all its operations, with a strong focus on creating a value chain free of human rights violations. In line with the policy statement on RWE's human rights strategy, we are committed to preventing and mitigating adverse human rights impacts to the greatest extent possible throughout our global business activities. This commitment extends beyond our organisational boundaries and also applies to business partners and specifically to direct suppliers.
In particular, with regard to labour-related rights such as forced labour, child labour, illegal employment and other forms of modern slavery, RWE's risk analysis highlights the upstream supply chain as a critical area for potential human rights violations. This analysis is a central component of the Human Rights Risk Management System (HRRMS). The gradual implementation of risk-based assessments and resulting initiatives allows RWE to proactively address risks, particularly those relating to direct suppliers, to ensure compliance with human rights obligations. Given the impact of modern slavery and human trafficking, RWE enforces a zero-tolerance policy and implements training programmes to raise awareness and drive action on these issues.
As already described under 'Own workforce', health and safety as part of working conditions is pivotal for RWE's business. The wellbeing of both our employees and workers of contractors or subcontractors working on our sites is of crucial importance to the Group. This is encapsulated in the principle 'All accidents are avoidable'. Furthermore, the 'Health and Safety' Group Directive serves to organise and safeguard health and safety standards, both in relation to our own employees and in relation to partner companies whose employees work at RWE sites. RWE's overarching goal to prevent occupational accidents and health hazards is supported, e.g. by selection criteria for contractors, comprehensive training, as well as regular monitoring and feedback.
As presented in the double materiality assessment (see pages 84 et seqq.), the prevention of forced labour and all forms of modern slavery as well as ensuring occupational health and safety for workers in the value chain are key sustainability considerations for RWE. The following table outlines the type of impacts on the labour force within the value chain resulting from RWE's activities.
Forced labour and all forms of modern slavery
(potential negative impact - upstream value chain)
Health and safety
(actual negative impact - upstream value chain)
In its indirect upstream value chain, RWE has identified potential negative impacts on other labour-related rights, such as forced labour and other forms of modern slavery. Despite contractual clauses with its direct suppliers, RWE acknowledges that there are risks of human rights violations, particularly for workers in the extended value chain. Indirect suppliers that provide components, raw materials or fuels from countries with less developed human rights standards, such as China, Thailand, Vietnam and Malaysia, often rely on low-skilled labour and have a higher risk profile for human rights violations.
We have identified significant potential impacts on the health of workers in the value chain, particularly at direct and indirect partner companies that work at RWE sites. The sites in question are either still in operation - some of which are undergoing extensive redevelopment - or are RWE plants currently under construction or being dismantled. In general, despite the existing health and safety measures and their ongoing optimisation, there are risks associated with working at height and with electric machines, systems or equipment, handling heavy loads and working with movable parts on systems and components. Failure to comply with health and safety instructions can result in serious injuries. Accidents can occur that can lead to long-term injuries or even death, both for our own employees and for employees in the value chain.
As part of its Human Rights Risk Management System, RWE implements measures that reduce or, where possible, avoid impacts on human rights, emphasising the importance of ethical business practices and zero tolerance for human rights violations. The strategic emphasis is on high-risk areas identified via a comprehensive risk analysis. Our target is to achieve a $100 \%$ adoption rate of 'Contracts with suppliers which include the Code of Conduct and human rights clauses', which is also embedded in the Executive Board's remuneration. In 2024, RWE reached the targeted adoption rate of $100 \%$.
One other sustainability-related Board remuneration KPI (see page 97) is also related to human rights and workers in the value chain, namely 'ESG assessment of business partners involved in fuel procurement for electricity generation at RWE power plants', which also reached the targeted rate of $100 \%$ in 2024. As part of this commitment, suppliers providing fuel to RWE power plants must undergo an ESG evaluation process. The targets will be maintained to help ensure all partners are covered. The Executive Board of RWE AG is informed of the annual results. The Supervisory Board assesses target achievement, reviews the targets annually and determines the goals for the following year.
In the context of health and safety in the workplace, RWE has set itself two targets concerning both its own employees and the employees of contractors who work at RWE sites. These two KPIs are also embedded in the sustainability-linked Executive Board remuneration. See Chapter S1 'Own workforce - Targets - Health and safety'.
No specific methods or assumptions were used to set the targets. RWE has not set a specific target for material negative impacts on employees in the extended value chain. Moreover, the targets set for our own employees also apply to partner companies with employees at our sites.
As an international energy company, RWE has a direct and indirect impact on people's living conditions in many countries. RWE's commitment to upholding high human rights standards is reflected in several key documents, such as the RWE Policy Statement on Human Rights (own business and supply chain), the Human Rights Supplier Contract Appendix (upstream), the Human Rights Rules of Procedure (entire value chain), as well as the Code of Conduct (entire value chain). All of the above documents have been adopted by the Executive Board of RWE AG and emphasise the importance of human rights and fair working conditions within the RWE Group and across its suppliers and business partners.
As a signatory to the United Nations Global Compact, RWE respects and supports the United Nations Universal Declaration of Human Rights, and leverage our influence to prevent, mitigate and, as far as possible, eliminate adverse human rights impacts within RWE's global operations. The Group is also committed to other international standards pertaining to our own employees and workers in the value chain through RWE's Policy Statement. These international standards include the International Labour Organisation's (ILO) Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work, the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, the International Convention on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, the Minamata Convention, the Stockholm Convention, the Basel Convention, the UN Guiding Principles for Business and Human Rights and the OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises. As part of our Human Rights Strategy Policy, RWE strictly opposes forced or compulsory labour (ILO 105) and child labour (ILO 138), including all forms of slavery and human trafficking.
With regard to the upstream supply chain, RWE uses the Human Rights Supplier Contract Appendix to require suppliers to uphold and protect internationally proclaimed human rights, including labour rights.
The Chief Human Rights Officer (CHRO), who is also the Head of Strategy \& Sustainability, is responsible for monitoring the implementation of the Human Rights Risk Management System (HRRMS) at Group level and ensuring compliance with the Policy Statement on Human Rights, under the guidance of the Executive Board of RWE AG. The Executive Board is regularly informed about the fulfilment of RWE's human rights due diligence obligations, such as the results of the risk analysis and any incidents identified.
For the coordination of our HRRMS, the Chief Human Rights Officer is supported by a team of human rights experts, who are specially trained to implement and observe measures across operational areas. This team works in conjunction with employees in various roles. For our own workforce this includes HR and legal representatives and for workers in the value chain, it involves procurement and operational staff. This cross-functional setup ensures a holistic approach to human rights due diligence. Each operating company has a Human Rights Officer responsible for handling complaints and incidents. They are supported by supply chain experts within the respective company, the central team of human rights experts and other relevant functions.
Risk analysis is a key element of the HRRMS. It is crucial for identifying and managing risks related to the protection of human rights in RWE's business units and supply chain. This analysis focuses primarily on identifying human rights and environmental risks within our own business activities, but above all in our direct upstream supply chain.
At present, RWE has not yet established a general process to enable a direct and regular exchange with workers in the supply chain. Regular feedback meetings are held with contractual partner companies whose employees work at RWE sites as part of occupational health and safety or at events such as the Supplier / Partner Company Days.
As part of the HRRMS, we have also introduced a comprehensive complaints procedure. It covers the processing of all human rights complaints in connection with the company, covering both its own activities and the upstream and downstream parts of the value chain. The complaints procedure is described in detail in the RWE Human Rights Code of Procedure.
Employees in the value chain can contact RWE directly by e-mail, via a contact form on the RWE website or via an external law firm (third party) to submit a complaint. Information about these channels is available on the RWE website. Suppliers are informed about the existence of these channels to ensure that their employees are aware of the complaints procedure.
If a complaint is received via a designated channel, it is examined by the team of human rights experts. If there is sufficient suspicion of possible human rights violations, an in-depth investigation is initiated.
In doing so, whistleblowers are protected as set out in the policy statement on RWE's human rights strategy. The disclosure of personal data is prohibited. Retaliation against complainants is not tolerated.
As described in the chapter on our own workforce, health and safety and the well-being of employees from partner companies working at our sites is particularly important in our plant-oriented business. The RWE Group Directive sets out principles and standards that apply throughout the Group and also include the employees in the value chain who work at our sites. We follow the same approaches and measures in this regard, as the principles, rules and the targets that apply to our own employees also apply to partner companies with employees at our sites (see page 154).
Health and safety criteria are integral to supplier identification, supplier evaluation and the contract awarding process. They also impact the instruction of employees of partner companies at RWE sites and the final evaluation of work performed from an occupational safety perspective.
In 2024, RWE continued its systematic risk analysis to assess and evaluate human rights risks throughout the Group and its supply chain.
Through its Human Rights Programme, RWE has implemented an approach developed in consultation with external stakeholders and experts. These efforts include a qualification process for potential suppliers.
Suppliers undergo screenings focused on ESG topics, such as environmental protection, human rights, health and safety, labour rights and responsible supply chain practices. Initially, the procurement departments carry out basic checks, involving media screening. Issues that are identified can trigger an expanded check using predefined questionnaires for self-disclosure evaluated by the procurement departments. The procurement departments decide whether an in-depth check is necessary based on risk analyses and complaints received concerning suppliers. RWE assesses suppliers based on various criteria such as the nature and extent of their business activity, RWE's ability to influence the directly responsible entity, the severity and reversibility of potential violations, and the likelihood of such violations occurring. Remedial and preventive measures are derived and implemented according to the resulting risk category. If infringements are identified, RWE may implement a Human Rights Action Plan and conduct audits to address substantial deviations. If remedial measures are not effective, this can lead to the termination of contracts for continued non-compliance.
Particular attention is given to high-risk suppliers, typically companies operating in countries with weaker labour protections and overall human rights safeguards. This allows RWE to identify workers who may be at higher risks in order to support informed decision-making and the implementation of appropriate measures.
The complaints procedure is a key component of the HRRMS. Employees in the value chain can use it to report human rights issues via various channels. The procedure forms the basis for RWE's human rights strategy and ensures an effective and timely response to all identified human rights issues. During the reporting year, no serious human rights violations or incidents in the value chain were reported through the complaints procedure.
RWE is actively involved in the 'Energy Industry Dialogue' and works with various organisations to protect human rights in global supply chains. We are committed to upholding internationally recognised standards, such as the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights.
To increase our leverage, RWE continues to engage in multi-stakeholder platforms. Together with other utility companies, we aim to increase global standards in energy commodity supply chains via the Responsible Commodity Sourcing Initiative (RECOSI). In 2024, the existing Bettercoal initiative was continued under the umbrella of RECOSI. In addition, a Gas Task Force was set up to improve procurement standards for global gas sales.
The systematic recording and analysis of incidents was continued during the year under review to support the evaluation and ongoing improvement of RWE's health and safety management system.
The annual RWE Partner Company Day took place in 2024 with a focus on the transformation in the federal state of North Rhine-Westphalia ('Rhenish mining region'). The event serve as a platform for RWE and contractor representatives to exchange ideas, aiming to systematically improve occupational safety processes and sustainably enhance safety standards. Contractors use the event to share their experiences in occupational health and safety and present newly implemented measures.
| Taxonomy-aligned economic activities (denominator): Revenue |
Amount and proportion (information in monetary amounts and as percentages) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CCM + CCA | Climate change mitigation (CCM) | Climate change adoptatlon (CCA) | ||||
| Row | Economic activities | € million | \% | € million | \% | € million |
| 1 | Amount and proportion of taxonomy-aligned economic activity referred to in Section 4.26 of Annexes I and II to Delegated Regulation 2021/2159 in the denominator of the revenue KPI | - | - | - | - | - |
| 2 | Amount and proportion of taxonomy-aligned economic activity referred to in Section 4.27 of Annexes I and II to Delegated Regulation 2021/2159 in the denominator of the revenue KPI | - | - | - | - | - |
| 3 | Amount and proportion of taxonomy-aligned economic activity referred to in Section 4.28 of Annexes I and II to Delegated Regulation 2021/2159 in the denominator of the revenue KPI | - | - | - | - | - |
| 4 | Amount and proportion of taxonomy-aligned economic activity referred to in Section 4.29 of Annexes I and II to Delegated Regulation 2021/2159 in the denominator of the revenue KPI | - | - | - | - | - |
| 5 | Amount and proportion of taxonomy-aligned economic activity referred to in Section 4.30 of Annexes I and II to Delegated Regulation 2021/2159 in the denominator of the revenue KPI | - | - | - | - | - |
| 6 | Amount and proportion of taxonomy-aligned economic activity referred to in Section 4.31 of Annexes I and II to Delegated Regulation 2021/2159 in the denominator of the revenue KPI | - | - | - | - | - |
| 7 | Amount and proportion of other taxonomy-aligned economic activities not referred to in rows 1 to 6 above in the denominator of the revenue KPI | 5,167 | 21 | 5,167 | 21 | - |
| 8 | Total revenue KPI | 24,224 | 100 |
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | RWE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| To our investors | Combined management report Group Sustainability Statement |
Consolidated financial statements | Notes from the auditor | Responsibility statement | Further information | Annual Report 2024 |
| Taxonomy-aligned economic activities (denominator): CapEx |
Amount and proportion (information in monetary amounts and as percentages) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CCM $\cdot$ CCA | Climate change mitigation (CCM) | Climate change adaptation (CCA) | ||||
| Row | Economic activities | € million | \% | € million | \% | € million |
| 1 | Amount and proportion of taxonomy-aligned economic activity referred to in Section 4.26 of Annexes I and II to Delegated Regulation 2021/2159 in the denominator of the CapEx KPI | - | - | - | - | - |
| 2 | Amount and proportion of taxonomy-aligned economic activity referred to in Section 4.27 of Annexes I and II to Delegated Regulation 2021/2159 in the denominator of the CapEx KPI | - | - | - | - | - |
| 3 | Amount and proportion of taxonomy-aligned economic activity referred to in Section 4.28 of Annexes I and II to Delegated Regulation 2021/2159 in the denominator of the CapEx KPI | - | - | - | - | - |
| 4 | Amount and proportion of taxonomy-aligned economic activity referred to in Section 4.29 of Annexes I and II to Delegated Regulation 2021/2159 in the denominator of the CapEx KPI | - | - | - | - | - |
| 5 | Amount and proportion of taxonomy-aligned economic activity referred to in Section 4.30 of Annexes I and II to Delegated Regulation 2021/2159 in the denominator of the CapEx KPI | - | - | - | - | - |
| 6 | Amount and proportion of taxonomy-aligned economic activity referred to in Section 4.31 of Annexes I and II to Delegated Regulation 2021/2159 in the denominator of the CapEx KPI | - | - | - | - | - |
| 7 | Amount and proportion of other taxonomy-aligned economic activities not referred to in rows 1 to 6 above in the denominator of the CapEx KPI | 11,238 | 94 | 11,238 | 94 | - |
| 8 | Total CapEx KPI | 12,017 | 100 |
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | RWE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| To our investors | Combined management report Group Sustainability Statement |
Consolidated financial statements | Notes from the auditor | Responsibility statement | Further information | Annual Report 2024 |
| Taxonomy-aligned economic activities (denominator): OpEx |
Amount and proportion (information in monetary amounts and as percentages) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CCM $\cdot$ CCA | Climate change mitigation (CCM) | Climate change adaptation (CCA) | ||||
| Row | Economic activities | € million | \% | € million | \% | € million |
| 1 | Amount and proportion of taxonomy-aligned economic activity referred to in Section 4.26 of Annexes I and II to Delegated Regulation 2021/2159 in the denominator of the OpEx KPI | - | - | - | - | - |
| 2 | Amount and proportion of taxonomy-aligned economic activity referred to in Section 4.27 of Annexes I and II to Delegated Regulation 2021/2159 in the denominator of the OpEx KPI | - | - | - | - | - |
| 3 | Amount and proportion of taxonomy-aligned economic activity referred to in Section 4.28 of Annexes I and II to Delegated Regulation 2021/2159 in the denominator of the OpEx KPI | - | - | - | - | - |
| 4 | Amount and proportion of taxonomy-aligned economic activity referred to in Section 4.29 of Annexes I and II to Delegated Regulation 2021/2159 in the denominator of the OpEx KPI | - | - | - | - | - |
| 5 | Amount and proportion of taxonomy-aligned economic activity referred to in Section 4.30 of Annexes I and II to Delegated Regulation 2021/2159 in the denominator of the OpEx KPI | - | - | - | - | - |
| 6 | Amount and proportion of taxonomy-aligned economic activity referred to in Section 4.31 of Annexes I and II to Delegated Regulation 2021/2159 in the denominator of the OpEx KPI | - | - | - | - | - |
| 7 | Amount and proportion of other taxonomy-aligned economic activities not referred to in rows 1 to 6 above in the denominator of the OpEx KPI | 564 | 28 | 564 | 28 | - |
| 8 | Total OpEx KPI | 2,026 | 100 |
| Taxonomy-aligned economic activities (numerator): Revenue | Amount and proportion (information in monetary amounts and as percentages) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CCM $\cdot$ CCA | Climate change mitigation (CCM) | Climate change adaptation (CCA) | ||||
| Row | Economic activities | € million | \% | € million | \% | € million |
| 1 | Amount and proportion of taxonomy-aligned economic activity referred to in Section 4.26 of Annexes I and II to Delegated Regulation 2021/2159 in the numerator of the revenue KPI | - | - | - | - | - |
| 2 | Amount and proportion of taxonomy-aligned economic activity referred to in Section 4.27 of Annexes I and II to Delegated Regulation 2021/2159 in the numerator of the revenue KPI | - | - | - | - | - |
| 3 | Amount and proportion of taxonomy-aligned economic activity referred to in Section 4.28 of Annexes I and II to Delegated Regulation 2021/2159 in the numerator of the revenue KPI | - | - | - | - | - |
| 4 | Amount and proportion of taxonomy-aligned economic activity referred to in Section 4.29 of Annexes I and II to Delegated Regulation 2021/2159 in the numerator of the revenue KPI | - | - | - | - | - |
| 5 | Amount and proportion of taxonomy-aligned economic activity referred to in Section 4.30 of Annexes I and II to Delegated Regulation 2021/2159 in the numerator of the revenue KPI | - | - | - | - | - |
| 6 | Amount and proportion of taxonomy-aligned economic activity referred to in Section 4.31 of Annexes I and II to Delegated Regulation 2021/2159 in the numerator of the revenue KPI | - | - | - | - | - |
| 7 | Amount and proportion of other taxonomy-eligible but not taxonomy aligned economic activities not referred to in rows 1 to 6 above in the numerator of the revenue KPI | 5,167 | 100 | 5,167 | 100 | - |
| 8 | Total amount and proportion of other taxonomy-eligible but not taxonomy aligned economic activities in the numerator of the revenue KPI | 5,167 | 100 |
| Taxonomy-aligned economic activities (numerator): | Amount and proportion (information in monetary amounts and as percentages) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CCM $\cdot$ CCA | Climate change mitigation (CCM) | Climate change adaptation (CCA) | ||||
| Row | Economic activities | € million | \% | € million | \% | € million |
| 1 | Amount and proportion of taxonomy-aligned economic activity referred to in Section 4.26 of Annexes I and II to Delegated Regulation 2021/2159 in the numerator of the CapEx KPI | - | - | - | - | - |
| 2 | Amount and proportion of taxonomy-aligned economic activity referred to in Section 4.27 of Annexes I and II to Delegated Regulation 2021/2159 in the numerator of the CapEx KPI | - | - | - | - | - |
| 3 | Amount and proportion of taxonomy-aligned economic activity referred to in Section 4.28 of Annexes I and II to Delegated Regulation 2021/2159 in the numerator of the CapEx KPI | - | - | - | - | - |
| 4 | Amount and proportion of taxonomy-aligned economic activity referred to in Section 4.29 of Annexes I and II to Delegated Regulation 2021/2159 in the numerator of the CapEx KPI | - | - | - | - | - |
| 5 | Amount and proportion of taxonomy-aligned economic activity referred to in Section 4.30 of Annexes I and II to Delegated Regulation 2021/2159 in the numerator of the CapEx KPI | - | - | - | - | - |
| 6 | Amount and proportion of taxonomy-aligned economic activity referred to in Section 4.31 of Annexes I and II to Delegated Regulation 2021/2159 in the numerator of the CapEx KPI | - | - | - | - | - |
| 7 | Amount and proportion of other taxonomy-aligned economic activities not referred to in rows 1 to 6 above in the numerator of the CapEx KPI | 11,238 | 100 | 11,238 | 100 | - |
| 8 | Total amount and proportion of taxonomy-aligned economic activities in the numerator of the CapEx KPI | 11,238 | 100 |
| Taxonomy-aligned economic activities (numerator): OpEx |
Amount and proportion (information in monetary amounts and as percentages) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CCM $\cdot$ CCA | Climate change mitigation (CCM) | Climate change adaptation (CCA) | ||||
| Row | Economic activities | € million | \% | € million | \% | € million |
| 1 | Amount and proportion of taxonomy-aligned economic activity referred to in Section 4.26 of Annexes I and II to Delegated Regulation 2021/2159 in the numerator of the OpEx KPI | - | - | - | - | - |
| 2 | Amount and proportion of taxonomy-aligned economic activity referred to in Section 4.27 of Annexes I and II to Delegated Regulation 2021/2159 in the numerator of the OpEx KPI | - | - | - | - | - |
| 3 | Amount and proportion of taxonomy-aligned economic activity referred to in Section 4.28 of Annexes I and II to Delegated Regulation 2021/2159 in the numerator of the OpEx KPI | - | - | - | - | - |
| 4 | Amount and proportion of taxonomy-aligned economic activity referred to in Section 4.29 of Annexes I and II to Delegated Regulation 2021/2159 in the numerator of the OpEx KPI | - | - | - | - | - |
| 5 | Amount and proportion of taxonomy-aligned economic activity referred to in Section 4.30 of Annexes I and II to Delegated Regulation 2021/2159 in the numerator of the OpEx KPI | - | - | - | - | - |
| 6 | Amount and proportion of taxonomy-aligned economic activity referred to in Section 4.31 of Annexes I and II to Delegated Regulation 2021/2159 in the numerator of the OpEx KPI | - | - | - | - | - |
| 7 | Amount and proportion of other taxonomy-aligned economic activities not referred to in rows 1 to 6 above in the numerator of the OpEx KPI | 564 | 100 | 564 | 100 | - |
| 8 | Total amount and proportion of taxonomy-aligned economic activities in the numerator of the OpEx KPI | 564 | 100 |
We state our activities in the natural gas business as being taxonomy-eligible, but not taxonomy-aligned. They essentially consist of electricity generation from natural gas.
| Taxonomy-eligible, but not taxonomy-aligned economic activities: Revenue |
Amount and proportion (information in monetary amounts and as percentages) |
||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CCM $\cdot$ ECA | Climate change mitigation (CCM) | Climate change adaptation (CCA) | |||||
| Row | Economic activities | € million | \% | € million | \% | € million | \% |
| 1 | Amount and proportion of taxonomy-eligible, but not taxonomy-aligned economic activity referred to in Section 4.26 of Annexes I and II to Delegated Regulation 2021/2139 in the denominator of the revenue KPI | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 2 | Amount and proportion of taxonomy-eligible, but not taxonomy-aligned economic activity referred to in Section 4.27 of Annexes I and II to Delegated Regulation 2021/2139 in the denominator of the revenue KPI | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 3 | Amount and proportion of taxonomy-eligible, but not taxonomy-aligned economic activity referred to in Section 4.28 of Annexes I and II to Delegated Regulation 2021/2139 in the denominator of the revenue KPI | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 4 | Amount and proportion of taxonomy-eligible, but not taxonomy-aligned economic activity referred to in Section 4.29 of Annexes I and II to Delegated Regulation 2021/2139 in the denominator of the revenue KPI | 6,919 | 29 | 6,919 | 29 | 0 | 0 |
| 5 | Amount and proportion of taxonomy-eligible, but not taxonomy-aligned economic activity referred to in Section 4.30 of Annexes I and II to Delegated Regulation 2021/2139 in the denominator of the revenue KPI | 145 | 1 | 145 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| 6 | Amount and proportion of taxonomy-eligible, but not taxonomy-aligned economic activity referred to in Section 4.31 of Annexes I and II to Delegated Regulation 2021/2139 in the denominator of the revenue KPI | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 7 | Amount and proportion of other taxonomy-eligible, but not taxonomy-aligned economic activities not referred to in rows 1 to 6 above in the denominator of the revenue KPI | 121 | 0 | 121 | 0 | - | - |
| 8 | Total amount and proportion of taxonomy-eligible, but not taxonomy-aligned economic activities in the denominator of the revenue KPI | 7,185 | 30 |
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | RWE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| To our investors | Combined management report Group Sustainability Statement |
Consolidated financial statements | Notes from the auditor | Responsibility statement | Further information | Annual Report 2024 |
Taxonomy-eligible, but not taxonomy-aligned economic activities:
CapEx
| Row | Economic activities | Amount and proportion (information in monetary amounts and as percentages) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CCM $\cdot$ CCA | Climate change mitigation (CCM) | Climate change adaptation (CCA) | ||||
| 1 | Amount and proportion of taxonomy-eligible, but not taxonomy-aligned economic activity referred to in Section 4.26 of Annexes I and Il to Delegated Regulation 2021/2139 in the denominator of the CapEx KPI | $€$ million | \% | € million | \% | € million |
| 2 | Amount and proportion of taxonomy-eligible, but not taxonomy-aligned economic activity referred to in Section 4.27 of Annexes I and II to Delegated Regulation 2021/2139 in the denominator of the CapEx KPI | - | - | - | - | - |
| 3 | Amount and proportion of taxonomy-eligible, but not taxonomy-aligned economic activity referred to in Section 4.28 of Annexes I and II to Delegated Regulation 2021/2139 in the denominator of the CapEx KPI | - | - | - | - | - |
| 4 | Amount and proportion of taxonomy-eligible, but not taxonomy-aligned economic activity referred to in Section 4.29 of Annexes I and II to Delegated Regulation 2021/2139 in the denominator of the CapEx KPI | 180 | 1 | 180 | 1 | - |
| 5 | Amount and proportion of taxonomy-eligible, but not taxonomy-aligned economic activity referred to in Section 4.30 of Annexes I and II to Delegated Regulation 2021/2139 in the denominator of the CapEx KPI | 28 | 0 | 28 | 0 | - |
| 6 | Amount and proportion of taxonomy-eligible, but not taxonomy-aligned economic activity referred to in Section 4.31 of Annexes I and II to Delegated Regulation 2021/2139 in the denominator of the CapEx KPI | - | - | - | - | - |
| 7 | Amount and proportion of other taxonomy-eligible, but not taxonomy-aligned economic activities not referred to in rows 1 to 6 above in the denominator of the CapEx KPI | 66 | 1 | 66 | 1 | - |
| 8 | Total amount and proportion of taxonomy-eligible, but not taxonomy-aligned economic activities in the denominator of the CapEx KPI | 274 | 2 |
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | RWE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| To our investors | Combined management report Group Sustainability Statement |
Consolidated financial statements | Notes from the auditor | Responsibility statement | Further information | Annual Report 2024 |
Taxonomy-eligible, but not taxonomy-aligned economic activities:
OpEx
| Row | Economic activities | Amount and proportion (information in monetary amounts and as percentages) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CCM $\cdot$ CCA | Climate change mitigation (CCM) | Climate change adaptation (CCA) | ||||
| 1 | Amount and proportion of taxonomy-eligible, but not taxonomy-aligned economic activity referred to in Section 4.26 of Annexes I and II to Delegated Regulation 2021/2139 in the denominator of the OpEx KPI | $€$ million | \% | € million | \% | € million |
| 2 | Amount and proportion of taxonomy-eligible, but not taxonomy-aligned economic activity referred to in Section 4.27 of Annexes I and II to Delegated Regulation 2021/2139 in the denominator of the OpEx KPI | - | - | - | - | - |
| 3 | Amount and proportion of taxonomy-eligible, but not taxonomy-aligned economic activity referred to in Section 4.28 of Annexes I and II to Delegated Regulation 2021/2139 in the denominator of the OpEx KPI | - | - | - | - | - |
| 4 | Amount and proportion of taxonomy-eligible, but not taxonomy-aligned economic activity referred to in Section 4.29 of Annexes I and II to Delegated Regulation 2021/2139 in the denominator of the OpEx KPI | 197 | 10 | 197 | 10 | - |
| 5 | Amount and proportion of taxonomy-eligible, but not taxonomy-aligned economic activity referred to in Section 4.30 of Annexes I and II to Delegated Regulation 2021/2139 in the denominator of the OpEx KPI | 23 | 1 | 23 | 1 | - |
| 6 | Amount and proportion of taxonomy-eligible, but not taxonomy-aligned economic activity referred to in Section 4.31 of Annexes I and II to Delegated Regulation 2021/2139 in the denominator of the OpEx KPI | - | - | - | - | - |
| 7 | Amount and proportion of other taxonomy-eligible, but not taxonomy-aligned economic activities not referred to in rows 1 to 6 above in the denominator of the OpEx KPI | 95 | 5 | 95 | 5 | - |
| 8 | Total amount and proportion of taxonomy-eligible, but not taxonomy-aligned economic activities in the denominator of the OpEx KPI | 315 | 16 |
As set out earlier, we state our nuclear activities as being not taxonomy-eligible.
| Economic activities not eligible for taxonomy | Revenue | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Row | Economic activities | € million | \% |
| 1 | Amount and proportion of not taxonomy-eligible economic activity referred to in Section 4.26 of Annexes I and II to Delegated Regulation 2021/2139 in the denominator of the revenue KPI | - | - |
| 2 | Amount and proportion of not taxonomy-eligible economic activity referred to in Section 4.27 of Annexes I and II to Delegated Regulation 2021/2139 in the denominator of the revenue KPI | - | - |
| 3 | Amount and proportion of not taxonomy-eligible economic activity referred to in Section 4.28 of Annexes I and II to Delegated Regulation 2021/2139 in the denominator of the revenue KPI | - | - |
| 4 | Amount and proportion of not taxonomy-eligible economic activity referred to in Section 4.29 of Annexes I and II to Delegated Regulation 2021/2139 in the denominator of the revenue KPI | - | - |
| 5 | Amount and proportion of not taxonomy-eligible economic activity referred to in Section 4.30 of Annexes I and II to Delegated Regulation 2021/2139 in the denominator of the revenue KPI | - | - |
| 6 | Amount and proportion of not taxonomy-eligible economic activity referred to in Section 4.31 of Annexes I and II to Delegated Regulation 2021/2139 in the denominator of the revenue KPI | 11,871 | 49 |
| 7 | Amount and proportion of other not taxonomy-eligible economic activities not referred to in rows 1 to 6 above in the denominator of the revenue KPI | 11,871 | 49 |
| 8 | Total amount and proportion of not taxonomy-eligible economic activities in the denominator of the revenue KPI | 11,871 | 49 |
| Economic activities not eligible for taxonomy | CopEx | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Row | Economic activities | € million | \% |
| 1 | Amount and proportion of not taxonomy-eligible economic activity referred to in Section 4.26 of Annexes I and II to Delegated Regulation 2021/2139 in the denominator of the CapEx KPI | - | - |
| 2 | Amount and proportion of not taxonomy-eligible economic activity referred to in Section 4.27 of Annexes I and II to Delegated Regulation 2021/2139 in the denominator of the CapEx KPI | - | - |
| 3 | Amount and proportion of not taxonomy-eligible economic activity referred to in Section 4.28 of Annexes I and II to Delegated Regulation 2021/2139 in the denominator of the CapEx KPI | 60 | 1 |
| 4 | Amount and proportion of not taxonomy-eligible economic activity referred to in Section 4.29 of Annexes I and II to Delegated Regulation 2021/2139 in the denominator of the CapEx KPI | - | - |
| 5 | Amount and proportion of not taxonomy-eligible economic activity referred to in Section 4.30 of Annexes I and II to Delegated Regulation 2021/2139 in the denominator of the CapEx KPI | - | - |
| 6 | Amount and proportion of not taxonomy-eligible economic activity referred to in Section 4.31 of Annexes I and II to Delegated Regulation 2021/2139 in the denominator of the CapEx KPI | - | - |
| 7 | Amount and proportion of other not taxonomy-eligible economic activities not referred to in rows 1 to 6 above in the denominator of the CapEx KPI | 445 | 4 |
| 8 | Total amount and proportion of not taxonomy-eligible economic activities in the denominator of the CapEx KPI | 505 | 4 |
| Economic activities not eligible for taxonomy | OpEx | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Row | Economic activities | € million | \% | ||
| 1 | Amount and proportion of not taxonomy-eligible economic activity referred to in Section 4.26 of Annexes I and II to Delegated Regulation 2021/2139 in the denominator of the OpEx KPI | - | |||
| 2 | Amount and proportion of not taxonomy-eligible economic activity referred to in Section 4.27 of Annexes I and II to Delegated Regulation 2021/2139 in the denominator of the OpEx KPI | - | |||
| 3 | Amount and proportion of not taxonomy-eligible economic activity referred to in Section 4.28 of Annexes I and II to Delegated Regulation 2021/2139 in the denominator of the OpEx KPI | 26 | 1 | ||
| 4 | Amount and proportion of not taxonomy-eligible economic activity referred to in Section 4.29 of Annexes I and II to Delegated Regulation 2021/2139 in the denominator of the OpEx KPI | - | |||
| 5 | Amount and proportion of not taxonomy-eligible economic activity referred to in Section 4.30 of Annexes I and II to Delegated Regulation 2021/2139 in the denominator of the OpEx KPI | - | |||
| 6 | Amount and proportion of not taxonomy-eligible economic activity referred to in Section 4.31 of Annexes I and II to Delegated Regulation 2021/2139 in the denominator of the OpEx KPI | - | |||
| 7 | Amount and proportion of other not taxonomy-eligible economic activities not referred to in rows 1 to 6 above in the denominator of the OpEx KPI | 1,121 | 55 | ||
| 8 | Total amount and proportion of not taxonomy-eligible economic activities in the denominator of the OpEx KPI | 1,147 | 57 |
| 1 To our investors |
2 Combined management report Group Sustainability Statement |
3 Consolidated financial statements |
4 Notes from the auditor |
5 Responsibility statement |
6 Further information |
RWE Annual Report 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Content index of ESRS disclosure requirements: Cross-cutting standard general disclosures
ESRS 2 IRO 2-56 and BP-2.16
| Disclosure requirements | Section/ Report |
Poge | Additional information | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ESRS 2 | General disclosures | |||
| BP-1 | General basis for preparation of the sustainability statement | SUS | 74 | |
| BP-2 | Disclosures in relation to specific circumstances | SUS | 76 | Estimations: E1, E4, E5 |
| Data points that derive from other EU legislation | SUS | 184 | ||
| GOV-1 | The role of the administrative, management and supervisory bodies | SUS | 95 | |
| GOV-2 | Information provided to and sustainability matters addressed by the undertaking's administrative, management and supervisory bodies | SUS | 96 | |
| GOV-3 | Integration of sustainability-related performance in incentive schemes | SUS | 97 | |
| GOV-4 | Statement on sustainability due diligence | SUS | 100 | |
| GOV-5 | Risk management and internal controls over sustainability reporting MR 59 Internal controls environment | SUS AR |
$\begin{aligned} & 100 \ & 61 \end{aligned}$ | Section 2.9 Development of risks and opportunities |
| SBM-1 | Strategy, business model and value chain (products, markets, customers) | $\begin{aligned} & \text { SUS } \ & \text { AR } \end{aligned}$ | $\begin{aligned} & 77 \ & 21,28 \end{aligned}$ | |
| Strategy, business model and value chain (headcount by country) | SUS | 157 | Disclosed in Chapter S1 | |
| Strategy, business model and value chain (breakdown of revenue) | SUS | 81 | Revenues from coal and gas | |
| SBM-2 | Interests and views of stakeholders | SUS | 82 | |
| SBM-3 | Material impacts, risks and opportunities and their interaction with strategy and business model | $\begin{aligned} & \text { SUS } \ & \text { AR } \end{aligned}$ | $\begin{aligned} & 83 \ & 209 \end{aligned}$ | Goodwill impairment test assumption |
| IRO-1 | Description of the process to identify and assess material impacts, risks and opportunities | SUS | 88 | GOV-5 - Risk management and internal control over sustainability reporting |
| IRO-2 | Disclosure requirements in ESRS covered by the undertaking's sustainability statement | SUS | 184 |
SUS - Sustainability Statement; AR - Annual Report.
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | RWE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| To our investors | Combined management report Group Sustainability Statement | Consolidated financial statements | Notes from the auditor | Responsibility statement | Further information | Annual Report 2024 |
Content index of ESRS disclosure requirements: Environmental standard - Climate change
ESRS 2 IRO 1-56
| Disclosure requirements | Section/ Report |
Page | Additional information | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ESRS E1 | Climate change | |||
| $\begin{aligned} & \text { ESRS 2, } \ & \text { GOV-3 } \end{aligned}$ | Integration of sustainability-related performance in incentive schemes | SUS | 97 | |
| E1-1 | Transition plan for climate change mitigation | SUS | 116 | |
| $\begin{aligned} & \text { ESRS 2, } \ & \text { SBM-3 } \end{aligned}$ | Material impacts, risks and opportunities, and their interaction with strategy and business model | SUS | 83,115 | |
| $\begin{aligned} & \text { ESRS 2, } \ & \text { IRO-1 } \end{aligned}$ | Description of the processes to identify and assess material climate-related impacts, risks and opportunities | SUS | 88 | |
| E1-2 | Policies related to climate change mitigation and adaptation | SUS | 119 | |
| E1-3 | Actions and resources in relation to climate change policies | SUS | 120 | |
| E1-4 | Targets related to climate change mitigation and adaptation | SUS | 116 | |
| E1-5 | Energy consumption and mix | SUS | 126 | |
| E1-6 | Gross Scopes 1, 2, 3 and total GHG emissions | SUS | 124 | |
| E1-7 | GHG removals and GHG mitigation projects financed through carbon credits | SUS | 117 | |
| E1-8 | Internal carbon pricing | SUS | 119 | |
| E1-9 | Anticipated financial effects from material physical and transition risks and potential climate-related opportunities | SUS | 83 |
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | RWE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| To our investors | Combined management report Group Sustainability Statement | Consolidated financial statements | Notes from the auditor | Responsibility statement | Further information | Annual Report 2024 |
Content index of ESRS disclosure requirements: Environmental standard - Biodiversity and ecosystems ESRS 2 IRO 2-56
| Disclosure requirements | Section/ Report |
Page | Additional information | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ESRS E4 | Biodiversity and ecosystems | |||
| E4-1 | Transition plan and consideration of biodiversity and ecosystems in strategy and business model | SUS | 133 | |
| $\begin{aligned} & \text { ESRS 2, } \ & \text { SBM-3 } \end{aligned}$ | Material impacts, risks and opportunities and their interaction with strategy and business model | SUS | 83,131 | |
| $\begin{aligned} & \text { ESRS 2, } \ & \text { IRO-1 } \end{aligned}$ | Description of processes to identify and assess material biodiversity and ecosystem-related impacts, risks and opportunities | SUS | 93,131 | |
| E4-2 | Policies related to biodiversity and ecosystems | SUS | 133 | |
| E4-3 | Actions and resources related to biodiversity and ecosystems | SUS | 135 | |
| E4-4 | Targets related to biodiversity and ecosystems | SUS | 133 | |
| E4-5 | Impact metrics related to biodiversity and ecosystems change | SUS | 138 | |
| E4-6 | Anticipated financial effects from biodiversity and ecosystems-related risks and opportunities | - | - |
SUS - Sustainability Statement; AR - Annual Report
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | RWE | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| To our investors | Combined management report Group Sustainability Statement | Consolidated financial statements | Notes from the auditor | Responsibility statement | Further information | Annual Report 2024 | 181 |
Content index of ESRS disclosure requirements: Environmental standard - Resource use and circular economy ESRS 2 IRO 2-56
| Disclosure requirements | Section/ Report |
Page | Additional information | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ESRS E5 | Circular economy and resource use | |||
| ESRS 2, IRO-1 |
Description of the processes to identify and assess material resource use and circular economy-related impacts, risks and opportunities | SUS | 94,142 | |
| E5-1 | Policies related to resource use and circular economy | SUS | 143 | |
| E5-2 | Actions and resources related to resource use and circular economy | SUS | 144 | |
| E5-3 | Targets related to resource use and circular economy | SUS | 143 | |
| E5-4 | Resource inflows | SUS | 144 | |
| E5-5 | Resource outflows | SUS | 145 | |
| E5-6 | Anticipated financial effects from material resource use and circular economy-related risks and opportunities | - | - |
SUS - Sustainability Statement; AR - Annual Report.
| 1 To our investors |
2 Combined management report Group Sustainability Statement |
3 Consolidated financial statements |
4 Notes from the auditor |
5 Responsibility statement |
6 Further information |
RWE Annual Report 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Content index of ESRS disclosure requirements: Social standard - Own workforce
ESRS 2 IRO 2-56
| Disclosure requirements | Section/ Report |
Page | Additional information | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ESRS S1 | Own workforce | |||
| SBM-2 | Interests and views of stakeholders | SUS | 81 | |
| SBM-3 | Material impacts, risks and opportunities and their interaction with strategy and business model | SUS | 83,150 | |
| S1-1 | Policies related to own workforce | SUS | 152 | |
| S1-2 | Process for engaging with own workers and workers' representatives about impacts | SUS | 154 | |
| S1-3 | Process to remediate negative impacts and channels for own workers to raise concerns | SUS | 155 | |
| S1-4 | Taking action on material impacts on own workforce | SUS | 156 | |
| S1-5 | Targets related to managing negative impacts, advancing positive impacts, and managing material risks and opportunities | SUS | 151 | |
| S1-6 | Characteristics of the undertaking's employees | SUS | 157 | |
| S1-7 | Characteristics of non-employee workers in the undertaking's own workforce | - | - | |
| S1-8 | Collective bargaining coverage and social dialogue | SUS | 159 | |
| S1-9 | Diversity metrics | - | - | |
| S1-10 | Adequote wages | SUS | 159 | |
| S1-11 | Social protection | - | - | |
| S1-12 | Persons with disabilities | - | - | |
| S1-13 | Training and skills development metrics | - | - | |
| S1-14 | Health and safety metrics | SUS | 159 | |
| S1-15 | Work-life balance metrics | - | - | |
| S1-16 | Compensation metrics (pay gap and total compensation) | - | - | |
| S1-17 | Incidents, complaints and severe human rights impacts | SUS | 160 |
SUS - Sustainability Statement; AR - Annual Report
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | RWE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| To our investors | Combined management report Group Sustainability Statement | Consolidated financial statements | Notes from the auditor | Responsibility statement | Further information | Annual Report 2024 |
Content index of ESRS disclosure requirements: Social standard - Workers in the value chain
ESRS 2 IRO 1-56
| Disclosure requirements | Section/ Report |
Page | Additional information | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ESRS S2 | Workers in the value chain | |||
| SBM-2 | Interests and views of stakeholders | SUS | 81 | |
| SBM-3 | Material impacts, risks and opportunities and their interaction with strategy and business model | SUS | 83,162 | |
| S2-1 | Policies related to value chain workers | SUS | 163 | |
| S2-2 | Processes for engaging with value chain workers about impacts | SUS | 164 | |
| S2-3 | Processes to remediate negative impacts and channels for value chain workers to raise concerns | SUS | 164 | |
| S2-4 | Taking action on material impacts on value chain workers, and approaches to managing material risks and pursuing material opportunities related to value chain workers, and effectiveness of those actions | SUS | 165 | |
| S2-5 | Targets related to managing material negative impacts, advancing positive impacts, and managing material risks and opportunities | SUS | 162 |
SUS - Sustainability Statement; AR - Annual Report
Appendix B: List of data points in cross-cutting and topical standards that derive from other EU legislation
ESRS 2 BP-2.15 and IRO 2-56
| Disclosure requirements | Data Point | Description | SFDR reference | Pillar 3 reference | Benchmark regulation reference | EU climate law reference | Section | Page | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Appendix B | |||||||||
| ESRS 2 GOV-1 | 21 d | Board's gender diversity | $\checkmark$ | $\checkmark$ | SUS | 96 | |||
| ESRS 2 GOV-1 | 21 e | Percentage of board members who are independent | $\checkmark$ | SUS | 96 | ||||
| ESRS 2 GOV-4 | 30 | Statement on due diligence | $\checkmark$ | SUS | 100 | ||||
| ESRS 2 SBM-1 | 40 d (i) | Involvement in activities related to fossil fuel activities | $\checkmark$ | $\checkmark$ | $\checkmark$ | SUS | 81 | ||
| ESRS 2 SBM-1 | 40 d (ii) | Involvement in activities related to chemical production | $\checkmark$ | $\checkmark$ | N/M | ||||
| ESRS 2 SBM-1 | 40 d (iii) | Involvement in activities related to controversial weapons | $\checkmark$ | $\checkmark$ | N/M | ||||
| ESRS 2 SBM-1 | 40 d (iv) | Involvement in activities related to cultivation and production of tobacco | $\checkmark$ | N/M | |||||
| ESRS E1-1 | 14 | Transition plan to reach climate neutrality by 2050 | $\checkmark$ | SUS | 116 | ||||
| ESRS E-1 | 16 g | Undertakings excluded from Paris-aligned benchmarks | $\checkmark$ | $\checkmark$ | SUS | 120 | |||
| ESRS E1-4 | 34 | GHG emission reduction targets | $\checkmark$ | $\checkmark$ | $\checkmark$ | SUS | 118 | ||
| ESRS E1-5 | 38 | Energy consumption from fossil sources disaggregated by sources (only high climate impact sectors) | $\checkmark$ | SUS | 127 | ||||
| ESRS E1-5 | 37 | Energy consumption and mix | $\checkmark$ | SUS | 127 | ||||
| ESRS E1-5 | 40-43 | Energy intensity associated with activities in high climate impact sectors | $\checkmark$ | SUS | 127 | ||||
| ESRS E1-6 | 44 | Gross Scope 1, 2, 3 and total GHG emissions | $\checkmark$ | $\checkmark$ | $\checkmark$ | SUS | 124 | ||
| ESRS E1-6 | 53-55 | Gross GHG emissions intensity | $\checkmark$ | $\checkmark$ | $\checkmark$ | SUS | 126 | ||
| ESRS E1-7 | 56 | GHG removals and carbon credits | $\checkmark$ | SUS | 117 | ||||
| ESRS E1-9 | 66 | Exposure of the benchmark portfolio to climate-related physical risks | $\checkmark$ | Phase-in | |||||
| ESRS E1-9 | 66 (a) | Disaggregation of monetary amounts by acute and chronic physical risks | $\checkmark$ | Phase-in | |||||
| ESRS E1-9 | 66 (c) | Location of significant assets at material physical risk | $\checkmark$ | Phase-in | |||||
| ESRS E1-9 | 67 (c) | Breakdown of the carrying value of real estate assets | $\checkmark$ | Phase-in | |||||
| ESRS E1-9 | 69 | Degree of exposure of the portfolio to climate-related opportunities | $\checkmark$ | Phase-in | |||||
| ESRS E2-4 | 28 | Amount of each pollutant listed in Annex II of the E-PRTR Regulation (European Pollutant Release and Transfer Register) emitted to air, water and soil | $\checkmark$ | N/M |
Appendix B: List of data points in cross-cutting and topical standards that derive from other EU legislation
ESRS 2 BP-2.15 and IRO 2-56
| Disclosure requirements | Data Point | Description | SFDR reference | Pillar 3 reference | Benchmark regulation reference | EU climate law reference | Section | Page |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Appendix B | ||||||||
| ESRS E3-1 | 9 | Water and marine resources | $\checkmark$ | N/M | ||||
| ESRS E3-1 | 13 | Dedicated policy | $\checkmark$ | N/M | ||||
| ESRS E3-1 | 14 | Sustainable oceans and seas | $\checkmark$ | N/M | ||||
| ESRS E3-1 | 28 c | Total water recycled and reused | $\checkmark$ | N/M | ||||
| ESRS E3-1 | 29 | Total water consumption in $\mathrm{m}^{3}$ per net revenue on own operations | $\checkmark$ | N/M | ||||
| ESRS 2 - SBM 3 - E4 | 16 a (i) | $\checkmark$ | SUS | 141 | ||||
| ESRS 2 - SBM 3 - E4 | 16 b | $\checkmark$ | SUS | 141 | ||||
| ESRS 2 - SBM 3 - E4 | 16 c | $\checkmark$ | SUS | 140 | ||||
| ESRS E4-2 | 24 b | Sustainable land/agriculture practices or policies | $\checkmark$ | N/M | ||||
| ESRS E4-2 | 24 c | Sustainable ocean/seas practices or policies | $\checkmark$ | N/M | ||||
| ESRS E4-2 | 24 d | Policies to address deforestation | $\checkmark$ | SUS | 135 | |||
| ESRS E5-5 | 37 d | Non-recycled waste | $\checkmark$ | SUS | 137 | |||
| ESRS E5-5 | 39 | Hazardous waste and radioactive waste | $\checkmark$ | N/M | ||||
| ESRS 2 - SBM 3 - S1 | 14 f | Risk of incidents of forced labour | $\checkmark$ | SUS | 148 | |||
| ESRS 2 - SBM 3 - S1 | 14 g | Risk of incidents of child labour | $\checkmark$ | SUS | 148 | |||
| ESRS S1-1 | 20 | Human rights policy commitments | $\checkmark$ | SUS | 151 | |||
| ESRS S1-1 | 21 | Due diligence policies on issues addressed by the fundamental International Labour Organization Conventions 1 to 8 | $\checkmark$ | SUS | 151 | |||
| ESRS S1-1 | 22 | Processes and measures for preventing human trafficking | $\checkmark$ | SUS | 163 | |||
| ESRS S1-1 | 23 | Workplace accident prevention policy or management system | $\checkmark$ | SUS | 163 | |||
| ESRS S1-3 | 32 c | Grievance/complaints handling mechanisms | $\checkmark$ | N/M | ||||
| ESRS S1-14 | 88 b, c | Number of fatalities and number and rate of work-related accidents | $\checkmark$ | $\checkmark$ | SUS | 159 | ||
| ESRS S1-14 | 88 e | Number of days lost to injuries, accidents, fatalities, or illness | $\checkmark$ | SUS | 159 |
SUS - Sustainability Statement; AR - Annual report; N/A - Data point is not applicable; N/M - Data point is not material
Appendix B: List of data points in cross-cutting and topical standards that derive from other EU legislation
ESRS 2 BP-2.15 and IRO 2-56
| Disclosure requirements | Data Point | Description | SFDR reference | Pillar 3 reference | Benchmark regulation reference | EU climate law reference | Section | Page |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Appendix B | ||||||||
| ESRS S1-16 | 97 a | Unadjusted gender pay gap | $\checkmark$ | $\checkmark$ | N/M | |||
| ESRS S1-16 | 97 b | Excessive CEO pay ratio | $\checkmark$ | N/M | ||||
| ESRS S1-17 | 103 a | Incidents of discrimination | $\checkmark$ | SUS | 160 | |||
| ESRS S1-17 | 104 a | Non-respect of UNGPs on Business and Human Rights and OECD guidelines | $\checkmark$ | $\checkmark$ | SUS | 160 | ||
| ESRS 2 - SBM 3 - S2 | 11 b | Significant risk of child labour or forced labour in the value chain | $\checkmark$ | SUS | 162 | |||
| ESRS S2-1 | 17 | Human rights policy commitments | $\checkmark$ | SUS | 163 | |||
| ESRS S2-1 | 18 | Policies related to value chain workers | $\checkmark$ | SUS | 163 | |||
| ESRS S2-1 | 19 | Non-respect of UNGPs on Business and Human Rights principles and OECD guidelines | $\checkmark$ | $\checkmark$ | SUS | 163 | ||
| ESRS S2-1 | 19 | Due diligence policies on issues addressed by the fundamental International Labour Organization Conventions 1 to 8 | $\checkmark$ | SUS | 163 | |||
| ESRS S2-4 | 36 | Human rights issues and incidents connected to the upstream and downstream value chain | $\checkmark$ | SUS | 166 | |||
| ESRS S3-1 | 16 | Human rights policy commitments | $\checkmark$ | N/M | ||||
| ESRS S3-1 | 17 | Non-respect of UNGPs on Business and Human Rights, ILO principles and OECD guidelines | $\checkmark$ | $\checkmark$ | N/M | |||
| ESRS S3-4 | 36 | Human rights issues and incidents | $\checkmark$ | N/M | ||||
| ESRS S4-1 | 16 | Policies related to consumers and end-users | $\checkmark$ | N/M | ||||
| ESRS S4-1 | 17 | Non-respect of UNGPs on Business and Human Rights and OECD guidelines | $\checkmark$ | $\checkmark$ | N/M | |||
| ESRS S4-4 | 35 | Human rights issues and incidents | $\checkmark$ | N/M | ||||
| ESRS G1-1 | 10 b | United Nations Convention against Corruption | $\checkmark$ | N/M | ||||
| ESRS G1-1 | 10 d | Protection of whistleblowers | $\checkmark$ | N/M | ||||
| ESRS G1-4 | 24 a | Fines for violation of anti-corruption and anti-bribery laws | $\checkmark$ | $\checkmark$ | N/M | |||
| ESRS G1-4 | 24 b | Standards of anti-corruption and anti-bribery (applied concept) | $\checkmark$ | N/M |
3.1 Income statement ..... 188
3.2 Statement of comprehensive income ..... 189
3.3 Balance sheet ..... 190
3.4 Cash flow statement ..... 192
3.5 Statement of changes in equity ..... 194
3.6 Notes ..... 196
3.7 List of shareholdings (part of the Notes) ..... 287
3.8 Boards (part of the Notes) ..... 346
| € million | Note | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue (including natural gas tax/electricity tax) ${ }^{1}$ | (1) | 24,439 | 28,689 |
| Natural gas tax/electricity tax | (1) | 215 | 168 |
| Revenue ${ }^{1}$ | (1) | 24,224 | 28,521 |
| Other operating income ${ }^{1}$ | (2) | 5,554 | 3,129 |
| Cost of materials ${ }^{1}$ | (3) | 15,408 | 17,159 |
| Stoff costs | (4) | 2,961 | 2,916 |
| Depreciation, amortisation and impairment losses ${ }^{1}$ | $(5),(10)$ | 3,234 | 3,824 |
| Other operating expenses | (6) | 2,207 | 3,878 |
| Income from investments accounted for using the equity method ${ }^{1}$ | $(7),(12)$ | 406 | 565 |
| Other income from investments | (7) | $-45$ | 4 |
| Income before financial result and tax ${ }^{1}$ | 6,329 | 4,442 | |
| Financial income ${ }^{1}$ | (8) | 2,494 | 2,474 |
| Finance costs | (8) | 2,480 | 2,917 |
| Income before tax ${ }^{1}$ | 6,343 | 3,999 | |
| Taxes on income ${ }^{1}$ | (9) | $-1,054$ | $-2,337$ |
| Income ${ }^{1}$ | 5,289 | 1,662 | |
| of which: non-controlling interests | 154 | 147 | |
| of which: net income/income attributable to RWE AG shareholders ${ }^{1}$ | 5,135 | 1,515 | |
| Basic and diluted earnings per share in $€^{1}$ | (26) | 6.91 | 2.04 |
| Amounts after tax $€$ million |
Note | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Income ${ }^{1}$ | 5,289 | 1,662 | |
| Actuarial gains and losses of defined benefit pension plans and similar obligations | 161 | $-806$ | |
| Income and expenses of investments accounted for using the equity method (pro-rata) | (12) | $-22$ | 25 |
| Fair valuation of equity instruments | $-363$ | 1,121 | |
| Income and expenses recognised in equity, not to be reclassified through profit or loss | $-224$ | 340 | |
| Currency translation adjustment ${ }^{1}$ | (20) | 127 | 10 |
| Fair valuation of debt instruments | 7 | 11 | |
| Fair valuation of financial instruments used for hedging purposes | (27) | $-4,626$ | 4,926 |
| Income and expenses of investments accounted for using the equity method (pro-rata) | (12), (20) | $-24$ | $-44$ |
| Income and expenses recognised in equity, to be reclassified through profit or loss in the future | $-4,516$ | 4,903 | |
| Other comprehensive income | $-4,740$ | 5,243 | |
| Total comprehensive income ${ }^{1}$ | 549 | 6,905 | |
| of which: attributable to RWE AG shareholders ${ }^{1}$ | 307 | 6,756 | |
| of which: attributable to non-controlling interests | 242 | 149 |
1 Prior-year figures restated; see pages 211 et seq.
| Assets $€$ million |
Note | 51 Dec 2024 | 51 Dec 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Non-current assets | ||||
| Intangible assets | (10) | 10,250 | 9,787 | |
| Property, plant and equipment¹ | (11) | 38,458 | 28,808 | |
| Investments accounted for using the equity method ${ }^{1}$ | (12) | 4,577 | 4,062 | |
| Other non-current financial assets | (13) | 5,244 | 5,573 | |
| Financial receivables | (14) | 500 | 439 | |
| Derivatives and other assets ${ }^{1}$ | (15) | 4,181 | 6,570 | |
| Deferred taxes | (16) | 208 | 642 | |
| 63,418 | 55,881 | |||
| Current assets | ||||
| Inventories | (17) | 2,560 | 2,270 | |
| Financial receivables ${ }^{1}$ | (14) | 1,971 | 2,605 | |
| Trade accounts receivable | 6,908 | 7,607 | ||
| Derivatives and other assets ${ }^{1}$ | (15) | 11,060 | 23,068 | |
| Income tax assets | 582 | 440 | ||
| Marketable securities | (18) | 6,851 | 7,724 | |
| Cash and cash equivalents | (19) | 5,090 | 6,917 | |
| 35,022 | 50,631 | |||
| 98,440 | 106,512 |
1 Prior-year figures restated; see pages 211 et seq.
| Equity and liabilities $€$ million |
Note | 31 Dec 2024 | 31 Dec 2023 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equity | (20) | ||||
| RWE AG shareholders' interest ${ }^{1}$ | 31,549 | 32,033 | |||
| Non-controlling interests | 2,074 | 1,571 | |||
| 33,623 | 33,604 | ||||
| Non-current liabilities | |||||
| Provisions | (22) | 15,690 | 17,431 | ||
| Financial liabilities | (23) | 14,772 | 14,064 | ||
| Income tax liabilities | (24) | 571 | 447 | ||
| Derivatives and other liabilities ${ }^{1}$ | (25) | 3,256 | 2,929 | ||
| Deferred taxes ${ }^{1}$ | (16) | 2,953 | 4,944 | ||
| 37,242 | 39,815 | ||||
| Current liabilities | |||||
| Provisions | (22) | 6,047 | 6,815 | ||
| Financial liabilities | (23) | 3,898 | 2,964 | ||
| Trade accounts payable | 5,479 | 5,114 | |||
| Income tax liabilities | (24) | 380 | 444 | ||
| Derivatives and other liabilities ${ }^{1}$ | (25) | 11,771 | 17,756 | ||
| 27,575 | 33,093 | ||||
| 98,440 | 106,512 |
1 Prior-year figures restated; see pages 211 et seq.
| € million² | Note (30) | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Income | 5,289 | 1,662 | |
| Depreciation, amortisation, impairment losses / write-backs | 3,195 | 3,821 | |
| Changes in provisions | $-2,382$ | 1,602 | |
| Changes in deferred taxes | 340 | 1,889 | |
| Income from disposal of non-current assets and marketable securities | $-371$ | $-273$ | |
| Other non-cash income / expenses and cash issues | $-2,862$ | $-810$ | |
| Changes in working capital | 3,411 | $-3,668$ | |
| Cash flows from operating activities | 6,620 | 4,223 | |
| Intangible assets / property, plant and equipment | |||
| Capital expenditure | $-9,377$ | $-5,146$ | |
| Proceeds from disposal of assets | 199 | 793 | |
| Acquisitions, investments | |||
| Capital expenditure | $-1,863$ | $-4,833$ | |
| Proceeds from disposal of assets/divestitures | 315 | 369 | |
| Cash-out for marketable securities and cash investments ${ }^{2}$ | $-3,197$ | $-6,413$ | |
| Proceeds from marketable securities and cash investments ${ }^{3}$ | 4,211 | 12,432 | |
| Cash flows from investing activities | $-9,712$ | $-2,798$ |
[^0]
[^0]: 1 Some prior-year figures restated; see pages 211 et seq.
2 Including net expenses for marketable securities in the segment Supply \& Trading of € 559 million during the reporting period.
3 Including net income from marketable securities in the segment Supply \& Trading of $€ 1,844$ million during the reporting period.
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | RWE | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| To our investors | Combined management report | Consolidated financial statements Cash flow statement | Notes from the auditor | Responsibility statement | Further information | Annual Report 2024 | 193 |
| € million ${ }^{1}$ | Note (30) | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Capital paid-in (incl. non-controlling interests) | 598 | 1 | |
| Capital repayments (incl. non-controlling interests) | -8 | -39 | |
| Share buyback | -138 | - | |
| Dividends paid to RWE AG shareholders and non-controlling interests | $-1,006$ | $-943$ | |
| Issuance of financial debt | 3,947 | 7,547 | |
| Repayment of financial debt | $-2,277$ | $-8,123$ | |
| Cash flows from financing activities | 1,116 | $-1,557$ | |
| Net cash change in cash and cash equivalents | $-1,976$ | $-132$ | |
| Effects of changes in foreign exchange rates and other changes in value on cash and cash equivalents | 149 | 61 | |
| Net change in cash and cash equivalents | $-1,827$ | $-71$ | |
| Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of the reporting period | 6,917 | 6,988 | |
| Cash and cash equivalents at end of the reporting period | 5,090 | 6,917 |
1 Some prior-year figures restated; see pages 211 et seq.

[^0]
[^0]: 1 Prior-year figures restated; see pages 211 et seq.
2 Transaction costs offset directly against equity from conversion of the mandatory convertible bond into RWE AG shares on 15 March 2023 (see page 166 of the 2023 RWE Annual Report).
3 Effects from conversion of the mandatory convertible bond into RWE AG shares on 15 March 2023 (see page 166 of the 2023 RWE Annual Report).
| Statement of changes in equity $€$ million | Subcribed capital of RWE AG | Additional paid-in capital of RWE AG |
Retained earnings and distributable profit | Own shares | Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income | RWE AG shareholders' interest | Non-controlling interests | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fair value measurement of financial instruments | ||||||||||
| Currency translation adjustments | Debt instruments measured at fair value through other comprehensive income | Used for hedging purposes | ||||||||
| Note (20) | ||||||||||
| Balance at 1 Jan 2024 | 1,904 | 6,489 | 14,892 | - | 615 | 31 | 8,102 | 32,033 | 1,571 | 33,604 |
| Capital paid in | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 97 | 97 |
| Share buyback | - | - | - | $-138$ | - | - | - | $-138$ | - | $-138$ |
| Dividends paid | - | - | $-744$ | - | - | - | - | $-744$ | $-262$ | $-1,006$ |
| Income | - | - | 5,135 | - | - | - | - | 5,135 | 154 | 5,289 |
| Other comprehensive income | - | - | $-224$ | - | 49 | 7 | $-4,660$ | $-4,828$ | 88 | $-4,740$ |
| Total comprehensive income | - | - | 4,911 | - | 49 | 7 | $-4,660$ | 307 | 242 | 549 |
| Other changes | - | - | $-250$ | - | - | - | 341 | 91 | 426 | 517 |
| Balance at 31 Dec 2024 | 1,904 | 6,489 | 18,809 | $-138$ | 664 | 38 | 3,783 | 31,549 | 2,074 | 33,623 |
RWE AG, recorded in Commercial Register B of the Essen District Court under HRB 14525 and headquartered at RWE Platz 1 in 45141 Essen, Germany, is the parent company of the RWE Group ('RWE' or 'Group'). RWE generates electricity from renewable and conventional sources, primarily in Europe and the USA. RWE also trades primarily in gas and electricity.
The consolidated financial statements for the period ended 31 December 2024 were approved for publication on 27 February 2025 by the Executive Board of RWE AG. The statements were prepared in accordance with the International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS Accounting Standards) applicable in the European Union (EU), as well as in accordance with the supplementary accounting regulations applicable pursuant to Sec. 315e, Para. 1 of the German Commercial Code (HGB). The previous year's figures were calculated according to the same principles.
A statement of changes in equity has been disclosed in addition to the income statement, the statement of comprehensive income, the balance sheet and the cash flow statement. The Notes also include segment reporting.
Several balance sheet and income statement items have been combined in the interests of clarity. These items are stated and explained separately in the Notes to the financial statements. The income statement is structured according to the nature of expense method.
The consolidated financial statements have been prepared in euros. Unless specified otherwise, all amounts are stated in millions of euros (€ million). Due to calculation procedures, rounding differences may occur.
These consolidated financial statements were prepared for the fiscal year from 1 January to 31 December 2024.
The Executive Board of RWE AG is responsible for the preparation, completeness and accuracy of the consolidated financial statements and the Group management report, which is combined with the management report of RWE AG.
We employ internal control systems, uniform groupwide directives and programmes for basic and advanced staff training to ensure that the consolidated financial statements and Group management report are adequately prepared. Compliance with legal regulations and the internal guidelines as well as the reliability and viability of the control systems are continuously monitored throughout the Group.
In line with the requirements of the German Corporate Control and Transparency Act (KonTraG), the Group's risk management system enables the Executive Board to identify risks at an early stage and take countermeasures, if necessary.
The consolidated financial statements, the combined management report and the related independent auditors' report are discussed in detail by the Audit Committee and at the Supervisory Board's meeting on financial statements with the auditors present.
In addition to RWE AG, the consolidated financial statements contain all material German and foreign companies which RWE AG controls directly or indirectly. In determining whether there is control, in addition to voting rights, other rights in company, inter-company and consortial contracts, and potential voting rights are also taken into consideration.
Material associates are accounted for using the equity method. Depending on their classification, principal joint arrangements are accounted for using the equity method or included on a pro-rata basis (as joint operations).
Associates are companies on which RWE AG exercises a significant influence on the basis of voting rights of $20 \%$ up to and including $50 \%$ or on the basis of contractual agreements. In classifying joint arrangements which are structured as independent vehicles, other facts and circumstances - in particular delivery relationships between the independent vehicle and the parties participating in such - are taken into consideration, in addition to the legal form and contractual agreements.
Investments in subsidiaries, joint ventures, joint operations or associates which are of secondary importance from a Group perspective are accounted for in accordance with IFRS 9 .
The list of Group shareholdings pursuant to Sec. 313, Para. 2 of the German Commercial Code (HGB) is presented on pages 287 et seqq.
The following summaries show the changes in the number of fully-consolidated companies as well as associates and joint ventures accounted for using the equity method:
| Number of fully consolidated companies | Germany | Abroad | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 Jan 2024 | 51 | 755 | 806 |
| First-time consolidation | 2 | 59 | 61 |
| Deconsolidation | -2 | -15 | -17 |
| Mergers | -1 | -61 | -62 |
| 31 Dec 2024 | 50 | 738 | 788 |
| Number of companies accounted for using the equity method |
Germany | Abroad | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 Jan 2024 | 10 | 19 | 29 |
| Acquisitions | - | 1 | 1 |
| Other changes | - | 1 | 1 |
| 31 Dec 2024 | 10 | 21 | 31 |
As in the previous year, two companies are presented as joint operations. Of these, Greater Gabbard Offshore Winds Limited, Reading, UK, is a material joint operation of the RWE Group. Greater Gabbard holds a 500 MW offshore wind farm, which RWE operates together with Scottish and Southern Energy (SSE) Renewables Holdings. RWE owns 50\% of the shares and receives $50 \%$ of the power generated (including green power certificates). The wind farm is part of the Offshore Wind segment.
First-time consolidation and deconsolidation generally take place when control is obtained or lost.
Sales of shares which led to a change of control resulted in sales proceeds from disposals amounting to $€ 246$ million, which were reported in other operating income (previous year: $€ 147$ million).
Acquisition of three offshore wind projects from Vattenfall. At end-March 2024, the acquisition of $100 \%$ of the shares in the three development projects Norfolk Vanguard West, Norfolk Vanguard East and Norfolk Boreas in the UK was completed. This acquisition was agreed with the Swedish group Vattenfall AB, Stockholm, Sweden, at the end of December 2023. The three offshore wind projects each have a planned capacity of 1.4 GW and are located off the coast of East Anglia. The three development projects have already secured seabed rights, grid connections, Development Consent Orders and all other key permits. Along with the projects, RWE also took on a team of 46 employees.
Due to the complex structure of the transaction, the initial accounting of the business combination has not been finalised, especially in relation to the valuation of non-current assets.
The assets and liabilities acquired within the scope of the transactions are presented in the following table:
| Balance-sheet items | IFRS carrying amounts (fair value) os initial consolidation | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Non-current assets | 1,337 | |||
| Current assets | 63 | |||
| Non-current liabilities | 121 | |||
| Current liabilities | 943 | |||
| Net assets | 336 | |||
| Purchase price | 344 | |||
| Provisional difference | 8 |
The fair value of the receivables included in non-current and current assets amounted to $€ 6$ million and corresponded to the gross amount of the receivables that are fully recoverable.
Since first-time consolidation as of 27 March 2024, the companies have contributed $€ 0$ million to the Group's revenue and - $€ 42$ million to the Group's earnings.
The purchase price was paid exclusively in cash and cash equivalents. Cash and cash equivalents in the amount of $€ 57$ million were acquired as part of the transaction.
The provisional difference is primarily based on expected future use effects, such as the project development competencies of the development team.
If all of the business combinations in the reporting period had occurred on 1 January 2024, Group income and Group revenue would have amounted to $€ 5,256$ million and $€ 24,224$ million, respectively.
Acquisition of the Dutch gas-fired power station Magnum. On 31 January 2023, RWE purchased 100\% of the shares in the company Eemshaven Magnum B.V., Amsterdam, Netherlands. With this acquisition, RWE took over the gas-fired power plant Magnum with a net capacity of around 1.4 GW , together with about 70 employees and related solar activities of approximately 6 MW .
Purchase of Con Edison's renewable energy business. The purchase of $100 \%$ of the shares of Con Edison Clean Energy Businesses, Inc. (CEB), Valhalla, USA, was completed on 1 March 2023. This acquisition was agreed with the US group Con Edison, Inc., New York, USA, in October 2022. As a leading renewables company in the United States, at the time of acquisition CEB had 3.1 GW of power generation capacity, around $90 \%$ of which comes from solar systems. This portfolio is complemented by a development pipeline of more than 7 GW. CEB has now been completely integrated into the US company RWE Clean Energy, LLC.
Acquisition of the British developer JBM Solar. On 1 March 2023, RWE acquired 100\% of the shares in the British photovoltaic and battery storage developer JBM Solar Ltd, Cardiff, United Kingdom. Along with a PV project pipeline with a total capacity of around 3.8 GW and 2.3 GW of battery storage, RWE has also taken on a team of around 30 employees.
Sale of the grid connection for the Triton Knoll offshore wind farm in the previous year. As a result of regulatory requirements, RWE was required to sell the grid connection for the Triton Knoll offshore wind farm in the United Kingdom. The sale of the grid connection, which was assigned to the Offshore Wind segment, was completed in December 2023. The gain on the disposal amounted to $€ 27$ million and was recognised in the 'other operating income' line item in the income statement in the previous year.
Sale of the Czech gas storage business in the previous year. The agreement concluded with the Czech state-owned transmission system operator ČEPS at the end of August 2023 on the sale of the Group company RWE Gas Storage CZ, s.r.o., Prague, Czechia, which was responsible for RWE's Czech gas storage operations, was completed on 18 September 2023. RWE Gas Storage CZ was part of the Supply \& Trading segment. The gain on deconsolidation amounted to $€ 128$ million and was recognised in the line item 'other operating income' in the income statement in the previous year.
The financial statements of German and foreign companies included in the scope of the Group's financial statements are prepared using uniform accounting policies.
Business combinations are reported according to the acquisition method. This means that capital consolidation takes place by offsetting the purchase price, including the amount of the non-controlling interests, against the acquired subsidiary's revalued net assets at the time of acquisition. In doing so, the non-controlling interests can either be measured at the prorated value of the subsidiary's identifiable net assets or at fair value. The subsidiary's identifiable assets, liabilities and contingent liabilities are measured at full fair value, regardless of the amount of the non-controlling interests. Intangible assets are reported separately from goodwill if they are separable from the company or if they stem from a contractual or other right. In accordance with IFRS 3, no new restructuring provisions are recognised within the scope of the purchase price allocation. If the purchase price exceeds the revalued prorated net assets of the acquired subsidiary, the difference is capitalised as goodwill. If the purchase price is lower, the difference is included in income.
In the event of deconsolidation, the related pro-rota goodwill is derecognised with an effect on income. Changes in the ownership share which do not alter the ability to control the subsidiary are recognised without an effect on income. By contrast, if there is a loss of control, the remaining shares are remeasured at fair value with an effect on income.
Expenses and income as well as receivables and payables between consolidated companies are eliminated; intra-group profits and losses are eliminated.
For investments accounted for using the equity method, goodwill is not reported separately, but rather included in the value recognised for the investment. In other respects, the consolidation principles described above apply analogously. If impairment losses on the equity value become necessary, we report such under income from investments accounted for using the equity method.
In their individual financial statements, the companies measure non-monetary foreign currency items at the balance-sheet date using the exchange rate in effect on the date they were initially recognised. Monetary items are converted using the exchange rate valid on the balance-sheet date. Exchange rate gains and losses from the measurement of monetary balance-sheet items in foreign currency occurring up to the balance-sheet date are recognised on the income statement.
Functional foreign currency translation is applied when converting the financial statements of companies outside of the Eurozone. As the principal foreign enterprises included in the consolidated financial statements conduct their business activities independently in their national currencies, their balance-sheet items are translated into euros in the consolidated financial statements using the average exchange rate prevailing on the balance-sheet date. This also applies for goodwill, which is viewed as an asset of the economically autonomous foreign entity. Expense and income items are translated using annual average exchange rates. Foreign currency translation differences from converting the financial statements of companies outside the euro area are reported in other comprehensive income without an effect on income. When translating the adjusted equity of foreign companies accounted for using the equity method, we follow the same procedure.
The following exchange rates (among others) were used as a basis for foreign currency translations:
| Exchange rates | Average | Year-end | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| in $€$ | 2028 | 2023 | 31 Dec 2024 | 31 Dec 2023 | |
| 1 US dollar | 0.93 | 0.92 | 0.96 | 0.90 | |
| 1 British pound | 1.18 | 1.15 | 1.21 | 1.15 | |
| 100 Czech korunas | 3.98 | 4.17 | 3.97 | 4.05 | |
| 1 Polish zloty | 0.23 | 0.22 | 0.23 | 0.23 | |
| 1 Danish crown | 0.13 | 0.13 | 0.13 | 0.13 | |
| 1 Swedish crown | 0.09 | 0.09 | 0.09 | 0.09 | |
| 1 Norwegian crown | 0.09 | 0.09 | 0.08 | 0.09 |
Since 30 June 2022, Türkiye has been classified as a hyperinflationary economy according to IAS 29. In these financial statements as at 31 December 2024, RWE thus applies IAS 29 in respect of the financial statements of one fully consolidated Turkish subsidiary.
Intangible assets are accounted for at amortised cost. With the exception of goodwill, all intangible assets have finite useful lives and are amortised using the straight-line method. Useful lives and methods of amortisation are reviewed on an annual basis.
Software for commercial and technical applications is amortised over three to five years and is reported under concessions and patent rights. 'Operating rights' refer to the entirety of the permits and approvals required for the operation of a power plant. Such rights are generally amortised over the economic life of the power plant, using the straight-line method. Capitalised customer relations are amortised over a maximum period of up to 35 years.
Goodwill is not amortised; instead it is subjected to an impairment test once every year, or more frequently if there are triggers for an impairment.
Development costs are capitalised if a newly developed product or process can be clearly defined, is technically feasible, and it is the company's intention to either use the product or process itself or market it. Furthermore, asset recognition requires that there be a sufficient level of certainty that the development costs lead to future cash inflows. Capitalised development costs are amortised over the period during which the products are expected to be sold. Research expenditures are recognised as expenses in the period in which they are incurred.
An impairment loss is recognised for an intangible asset if the recoverable amount of the asset is less than its carrying amount. A special regulation applies for cases when the asset is part of a cash-generating unit. Such units are defined as the smallest identifiable group of assets which generates cash inflows; these inflows must be largely independent of cash inflows from other assets or groups of asset. If the intangible asset is a part of a cashgenerating unit, the impairment loss is calculated based on the recoverable amount of this unit. If goodwill was allocated to a cash-generating unit and the carrying amount of the unit exceeds the recoverable amount, the allocated goodwill is initially written down by the difference. Impairment losses which must be recognised in addition to this are taken into account by reducing the carrying amount of the other assets of the cash-generating unit on a prorated basis. If the reason for an impairment loss recognised in prior periods has ceased to exist, a write-back to intangible assets is performed. The increased carrying amount resulting from the write-back may not, however, exceed the amortised cost. Impairment losses on goodwill are not reversed.
Property, plant and equipment is stated at depreciated cost. Borrowing costs are capitalised as part of the asset's cost, if they are incurred directly in connection with the acquisition or production of a 'qualified asset'. What characterises a qualified asset is that a considerable period of time is required to prepare it for use or sale. If necessary, the cost of property, plant and equipment may contain the estimated expenses for the decommissioning of plants or site restoration. Maintenance and repair costs are recognised as expenses.
With the exception of land and leasehold rights, as a rule, property, plant and equipment is depreciated using the straight-line method, unless in exceptional cases another depreciation method is better suited to the usage pattern. The depreciation methods are reviewed annually. We calculate the depreciation of RWE's typical property, plant and equipment according to the following useful lives, which apply throughout the Group and are also reviewed annually:
| Useful life in years | |
|---|---|
| Buildings | $3-50$ |
| Technical plants | |
| Thermal power plants | $6-40$ |
| Wind assets | up to 30 |
| Solar assets | $25-35$ |
| Battery storage facilities | $10-15$ |
| Gas storage facilities | $10-50$ |
| Mining facilities | $3-25$ |
| Other renewable generation facilities | $3-50$ |
During the review of useful lives, the useful life span of wind assets was adjusted to a period of up to 30 years (previously: up to 25 years) in the reporting year. This adjustment was carried out in a prospective manner. As a result of this, the scheduled depreciation of wind assets declined by $€ 99$ million in 2024. An effect of a similar magnitude is expected in the coming years.
Repowering renewable energy assets involves the partial or complete demolition of existing wind or solar farms and their replacement at the same location with assets that are more modern or offer better performance. Starting from the time when the decision is made to repower a renewable generation asset, the estimated residual lifespan of the
assets and components affected by repowering is prospectively reduced to the period of time until the repowering is performed. As a result of this, the scheduled depreciation of the renewable assets affected by repowering measures increased by $€ 8$ million in 2024.
In relation to lignite mining and generation, the decommissioning data from the Act on Coal Phaseout are taken into consideration in determining the useful life spans.
Property, plant and equipment also include right-of-use assets resulting from leases of which RWE is the lessee. These right-of-use assets are measured at cost. The cost results from the present value of the lease instalments, adjusted to take into account advance payments, initial direct costs and potential dismantling obligations and corrected for received lease incentives. Right-of-use assets are depreciated using the straight-line method over the lease term..
For short-term leases and leases for low-value assets, lease instalments are recognised as an expense over the lease term. For operating leases of which RWE is the lessor, the minimum lease instalments are recognised as income over the lease term.
Impairment losses and write-backs on property, plant and equipment are recognised according to the principles described for intangible assets.
Investments accounted for using the equity method are initially accounted for at cost and thereafter based on the carrying amount of their prorated net assets. The carrying amounts are increased or reduced annually by prorated profits or losses, dividends and all other changes in equity. Goodwill is not reported separately, but rather included in the recognised value of the investment. As a result of this, goodwill is not subject to amortisation or a separate impairment test. An impairment loss is recognised for investments accounted for using the equity method, if the recoverable amount is less than the carrying amount.
The initial measurement of other financial assets occurs at the settlement date. Shares in non-consolidated subsidiaries and in associates or joint ventures are recognised at fair value through profit or loss. Other investments are also recognised at fair value. The option to state changes in fair value in other comprehensive income is exercised for some of these equity instruments. Non-current securities are also accounted for at fair value and changes in value are recognised through profit or loss or other comprehensive income depending on their classification. Gains and losses on sales of equity instruments, for which the option to state changes in fair value in other comprehensive income is exercised, remain in equity and are not reclassified to the income statement. An impairment in the amount of the expected credit losses is recognised through profit or loss for debt instruments that are recognised at fair value through other comprehensive income. The changes reported in other comprehensive income are recognised with an effect on earnings upon the sale of these instruments.
Receivables are comprised of financial receivables, trade accounts receivable and other receivables. Aside from financial derivatives, receivables and other assets are stated at amortised cost minus a credit risk provision in the amount of the expected credit losses.
Loans reported under financial receivables are stated at amortised cost minus a risk provision in the amount of the expected losses. Loans with interest rates common in the market are recognised at the transaction price less any ancillary costs; non-interest or low-interest loans are, as a rule, disclosed at their present value discounted using an interest rate commensurate with the risks involved.
Lease receivables from finance leases, in which RWE is the lessor, are reported under financial receivables. In finance lease arrangements, the substantial risks and rewards associated with ownership of the underlying asset are transferred to the lessee. Accordingly, upon the commencement of a lease, for finance leases the lessor must derecognise the carrying value of the underlying asset and record a receivable in the amount of the net investment in the lease. The payments received from the lessee are divided into payments of principal and payments of interest, with the payments of interests determined over the lifetime of the lease on the basis of the effective interest rate method.
$\mathrm{CO}{2}$ emission allowances and certificates for renewable energies are accounted for as intangible assets and reported under other assets; both are stated at cost and are not amortised. Upon submission to the relevant authorities, $\mathrm{CO}{2}$ emission allowances and certificates for renewable energies are offset against the use of the provisions recognised for obligations to deliver such emission allowances and certificates.
Deferred taxes result from temporary differences in the carrying amount in the separate IFRS financial statements and tax bases, and from consolidation procedures. Deferred tax assets also include tax reduction claims resulting from the expected utilisation of existing loss carryforwards in subsequent years. Deferred taxes are capitalised if it is sufficiently certain that the related economic advantages can be used. Their amount is assessed with regard to the tax rates applicable or expected to be applicable in the specific country at the time of realisation. The tax regulations valid or adopted as of the balance-sheet date are key considerations in this regard. Deferred tax assets and deferred tax liabilities are netted out for each company and / or tax group. In many countries in which RWE operates, legal regulations on minimum taxation have been introduced in accordance with the OECD guidelines for the new global minimum tax framework (BEPS Pillar 2). In line with IAS 12 as amended in 2023, the potential impacts on deferred taxes from this are not taken into consideration.
Inventories are assets which are held for sale in the ordinary course of business (finished goods and goods for resale), which are in the process of production (work in progress goods and services) or which are consumed in the production process or in the rendering of services (raw materials including nuclear fuel assemblies).
Insofar as inventories are not acquired primarily for the purpose of realising a profit on a short-term resale transaction, they are carried at the lower of cost or net realisable value. Production costs reflect the full costs directly related to production; they are determined based on normal capacity utilisation and, in addition to directly allocable costs, they also include adequate portions of required materials and production overheads. They also include production-related depreciation. Borrowing costs, however, are not capitalised as part of the cost. The determination of cost is generally based on average values.
If the net realisable value of inventories written down in earlier periods has increased, the reversal of the write-down is recognised as a reduction of the cost of materials.
Nuclear fuel assemblies are stated at amortised cost. Depreciation is determined by operation and capacity, based on consumption and the reactor's useful life.
Inventories which are acquired primarily for the purpose of realising a profit on a shortterm resale transaction are recognised at fair value less costs to sell. Changes in value are recognised with an effect on income. The fair value of gas inventories purchased for resale is determined every month on the basis of the current price curves of the relevant indices for gas (e.g. TTF). The valuations are based on prices which can be observed directly or indirectly (Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy). Differences between the fair value and the carrying value of inventories acquired for resale purposes are recognised on the income statement at the end of the month.
Securities classified as current marketable securities essentially consist of fixed-interest securities which have a maturity of more than three months and less than one year from the date of acquisition. Securities are measured in part at fair value through profit or loss or at fair value through other comprehensive income. The transaction costs directly associated with the acquisition of these securities are included in the initial measurement, which occurs on their settlement date. Unrealised gains and losses are recognised through profit or loss or other comprehensive income, with due consideration of any deferred taxes depending on the underlying measurement category. In part, current marketable securities are also measured at amortised cost. An impairment in the amount of the expected credit losses is recognised through profit or loss for debt instruments that are stated at fair value through other comprehensive income. Changes included in other comprehensive income are recognised through profit or loss on disposal of such instruments.
Cash and cash equivalents consist of cash on hand, demand deposits and current fixedinterest securities with a maturity of three months or less from the date of acquisition.
The stock option plans granted by RWE to executives and members of corporate bodies are accounted for as cash-settled share-based payment. At the balance-sheet date, a provision is recognised in the amount of the prorated fair value of the payment obligation. Changes in the fair value are recognised with an effect on income. The fair value of options is determined using generally accepted valuation methodologies.
Provisions are recognised for all legal or constructive obligations to third parties which exist on the balance-sheet date and stem from past events which will probably lead to an outflow of resources, and the amount of which can be reliably estimated. Provisions are carried at their prospective settlement amount and are not offset against reimbursement claims. If a provision involves a large number of items, the obligation is estimated by weighting all possible outcomes by their probability of occurrence (expected value method).
All non-current provisions are recognised at their prospective settlement amount, which is discounted as of the balance-sheet date. In the determination of the settlement amount, any cost increases likely to occur up until the time of settlement are taken into account.
If necessary, the cost of property, plant and equipment may contain the estimated expenses for the decommissioning of plants or site restoration. Decommissioning, restoration and similar provisions are recognised for these expenses. If changes in the discount rate or changes in the estimated timing or amount of the payments result in changes in the provisions, the carrying amount of the respective asset is increased or decreased by the corresponding amount. If the decrease in the provision exceeds the carrying amount, the excess is recognised immediately through profit or loss.
As a rule, releases of provisions are credited to the expense account on which the provision was originally recognised.
Provisions for pensions and similar obligations are recognised for defined benefit plans. These are obligations of the company to pay future and ongoing post-employment benefits to entitled current and former employees and their surviving dependents. In particular, the obligations refer to retirement pensions. Individual commitments are generally oriented to the employees' length of service and compensation.
Provisions for defined benefit plans are based on the actuarial present value of the respective obligation. This is measured using the projected unit credit method. This method not only takes into account the pension benefits and benefit entitlements known as of the balance-sheet date, but also anticipated future increases in salaries and pension benefits. The calculation is based on actuarial reports, taking into account appropriate biometric parameters (for Germany, the 'Richttafeln 2018 G' by Klaus Heubeck, and the Standard SAPS Table S3PA of the respective year for the United Kingdom, taking into
consideration future changes in mortality rates). The provision derives from the balance of the actuarial present value of the obligations and the fair value of the plan assets. The service cost is disclosed in staff costs. Net interest is included in the financial result.
Gains and losses on the revaluation of net defined benefit liability or asset are fully recognised in the fiscal year in which they occur. They are reported outside of profit or loss, as a component of other comprehensive income in the statement of comprehensive income, and are immediately assigned to retained earnings. They remain outside profit or loss in subsequent periods as well.
In the case of defined contribution plans, the enterprise's obligation is limited to the amount it contributes to the plan. Contributions to the plan are reported under staff costs.
Waste management provisions in the nuclear energy sector are based on obligations under public law, in particular the German Atomic Energy Act, and on restrictions from operating licenses. These provisions are measured using estimates, which are based on contracts as well as information from internal and external specialists.
Provisions for mining damage are recognised for obligations existing as of the balancesheet date and identifiable when the balance sheet is being prepared to cover land recultivation, resettlement and relocation and remediation of mining damage that has already occurred or been caused. The provisions must be recognised due to obligations under public law, such as the German Federal Mining Act, and formulated, above all, in operating schedules and water law permits. Such provisions are measured at full expected cost or according to estimated compensation payments, which are based on detailed contracts as well as information from internal and external specialists.
A provision is recognised to cover the obligation to submit $\mathrm{CO}{2}$ emission allowances and certificates for renewable energies to the respective authorities; this provision is primarily measured at the secured forward price of the $\mathrm{CO}{2}$ allowances or certificates for renewable
energies. If a portion of the obligation is not covered with allowances that are available or have been purchased forward, the provision for this portion is measured using the market price of the emission allowances or certificates for renewable energies on the reporting date.
Liabilities consist of financial liabilities, trade accounts payable, income tax liabilities and derivatives and other liabilities. With the exception of income tax liabilities and contractual liabilities, upon initial recognition, these are generally stated at fair value including transaction costs and are carried at amortised cost in the periods thereafter (except for derivative financial instruments). Lease liabilities are measured at the present value of the future lease payments. For subsequent measurements, the lease payments are divided into the financing costs and repayment portion of the outstanding debt. Financing costs are distributed over the lease term in such a manner that a steady interest rate is created for the outstanding debt.
If uncertain income tax items are recognised in income tax liabilities because they are probable, the former are generally measured at the most likely amount. Measurement at expected value is only considered in exceptional cases.
Moreover, other liabilities also include contract liabilities. A contract liability is the obligation of the Group to transfer goods or services to a customer, for which we have already received consideration or for which the consideration is already due.
Government grants provided in relation to the acquisition of an asset are not deducted from the cost of the subsidised asset; they are reported as deferrals under other liabilities. These deferrals are reversed with an effect on income over the economic life of the subsidised asset. Government grants related to income are offset against the corresponding expenses.
Derivative financial instruments are recognised as assets or liabilities and measured at fair value, regardless of their purpose. Changes in this value are recognised with an effect on income, unless the instruments are used for hedge accounting purposes. In such cases, recognition of changes in the fair value depends on the type of hedging transaction.
Fair value hedges are used to hedge assets or liabilities carried on the balance sheet against the risk of a change in their fair value. The following applies: changes in the fair value of the hedging instrument and the fair value of the respective underlying transactions are recognised in the same line item on the income statement. Hedges of unrecognised firm commitments are also recognised as fair value hedges. Changes in the fair value of the firm commitments with regard to the hedged risk result in the recognition of an asset or liability with an effect on income.
Cash flow hedges are used to hedge the risk of variability in future cash flows related to an asset or liability carried on the balance sheet or related to a highly probable forecast transaction. If a cash flow hedge exists, unrealised gains and losses from the hedging instrument are initially stated as other comprehensive income. Such gains or losses are only included on the income statement when the hedged underlying transaction has an effect on income. If forecast transactions are hedged and such transactions lead to the recognition of a financial asset or financial liability in subsequent periods, the amounts that were recognised in equity until this point in time are recognised on the income statement in the period during which the asset or liability affects the income statement. If the transactions result in the recognition of non-financial assets or liabilities, for example the acquisition of property, plant and equipment, the amounts recognised in equity without an effect on income are included in the initial cost of the asset or liability.
The purpose of hedges of a net investment in foreign operations (net investment hedges) is to hedge the currency risk from investments with foreign functional currencies. With the exception of hedging costs, unrealised gains and losses from such hedges are recognised in other comprehensive income until disposal of the foreign operation.
Hedging relationships must be documented in detail and meet the following effectiveness requirements:
Only the effective portion of a hedge is recognised in accordance with the preceding rules. The ineffective portion is recognised immediately on the income statement with an effect on income.
If they are concluded for trading or optimisation purposes, contracts for the receipt or delivery of non-financial items are accounted for as derivative financial instruments and reported at fair value in accordance with IFRS 9. By contrast, if these contracts are concluded for the company's expected purchase, sale or usage requirements (own-use contracts), they are not accounted for as derivative financial instruments, but rather as executory contracts. If the contracts contain embedded derivatives, the derivatives are accounted separately from the host contract, insofar as the economic characteristics and risks of the embedded derivatives are not closely related to the economic characteristics and risks of the host contract. Written options to buy or sell a non-financial item which can be settled in cash are not own-use contracts. For physically settled contracts to purchase or sell non-financial items, income is realised and the cost of materials is recognised upon
settlement at the prevailing market price, insofar as these contracts do not fall under the scope of IFRS 9 (so-called 'failed own-use contracts').
Derivative financial instruments are divided into current and non-current assets and liabilities. Derivatives concluded for proprietary trading purposes are classified as current assets or liabilities, whereas derivatives related to hedging transactions are classified on the basis of their maturity. Due to the necessary collaterals, exchange-traded derivative financial instruments are classified as current.
As a rule, non-derivative and derivative financial instrument are offset on the balance sheet, insofar as there is an unrestricted right, as well as the intention, to settle the corresponding items at the same time or on a net basis.
Contingent liabilities are possible obligations to third parties or existing obligations which will probably not lead to an outflow of economic benefits or the amount of which cannot be measured reliably. Contingent liabilities are only recognised on the balance sheet if they were assumed within the framework of a business combination. The amounts disclosed in the Notes correspond to the best possible estimate of the settlement amount at the balance-sheet date.
Contingent receivables are possible assets resulting from past events, the existence of which must be confirmed by future events that are not under the full control of RWE. Contingent receivables are not stated in the balance sheet. The amounts disclosed in the Notes correspond to the best possible estimate of the financial effects at the balancesheet date.
Renewable energy projects in the USA are primarily subsidised via tax credits and tax benefits (hereinafter referred to jointly as tax items). Within the framework of so-called tax equity financing, tax equity investors participate directly in financing the generation
facilities of individual project companies. Due to its financing character, the capital contributed by the tax equity investor is reported under financial liabilities, in the amount of the outstanding repayment.
Repayment of interest and capital for the tax equity liability occurs primarily without cash outflows via the direct allocation of the tax items generated by the project to the tax equity investor, which can then apply the items in relation to its own tax accounting. In addition to this, repayment of interest and capital also occurs in cash.
The tax equity arrangement and the related obligation to maintain proper operations is treated similar to a contract for services. The income resulting from the tax items is recorded under other operating income, with this income realised using the straight-line method over the anticipated duration of the tax equity contracts. In this regard, linear realisation of the income is capped at the amount of income that will most likely be generated during the contract, and any amounts above and beyond this are only recognised up to the amount of income that is actually generated.
Management judgements in the application of accounting policies. Management judgements are required in the application of accounting policies. In particular, this pertains to the following aspects:
Management estimates and judgements. Preparation of consolidated financial statements pursuant to IFRS requires assumptions and accounting estimates to be made. In the event of uncertainties in relation to the measurement of items in the financial statements, it can be necessary to make accounting estimates. The estimates can have an impact on the recognised value of the assets and liabilities carried on the balance sheet, on income and expenses and on the disclosure of contingent receivables and liabilities.
Amongst other things, these assumptions and estimates relate to the accounting and measurement of provisions. With regard to non-current provisions, the discount factor and price increases to be applied are important estimates, in addition to the amount and timing of future cash flows. The discount factor for pension obligations is determined on the basis of yields on high-quality, fixed-rate corporate bonds on the financial markets as of the balance-sheet date, in accordance with the maturities and due dates. For additional information on assumptions and estimates in relation to non-current provisions and pension obligations, see (22) Provisions.
Measuring the fair value of commodity derivatives involves the use of market-based assumptions to determine the relevant input factors for suitable accounting methods. These assumptions are constantly reviewed. In particular, assumptions related to price curves, anticipated volumes and other risk-relevant input factors are frequently reviewed in order to determine a meaningful fair value (see (27) Reporting on financial instruments).
The rules governing valuation allowances for financial assets under IFRS 9 stipulate that the expected credit losses must be determined. The valuation allowance is based on information from within and outside the Group. For additional information on assumptions and estimates in relation to determining the expected credit losses for financial assets, see (27) Reporting on financial instruments.
The impairment test for goodwill, property, plant and equipment, intangible assets and investments accounted for using the equity method is based on certain assumptions pertaining to the future, which are regularly adjusted. Property, plant and equipment, intangible assets and investments accounted for using the equity method are tested for indications of impairment on each cut-off date. As part of this impairment test, the recoverable amount of the asset must be determined; this occurs on the basis of valuation models and input factors. For additional information on assumptions and estimates in relation to determining the recoverable amount, see (5) Depreciation, amortisation and impairment losses and (10) Intangible assets.
Power plants and in some cases opencast mines are grouped together as a cashgenerating unit if their production capacity and fuel needs are centrally managed as part of a portfolio, and it is not possible to ascribe individual contracts and cash flows to the specific power plants.
The depreciation periods for our property, plant and equipment are based on the underlying useful life spans of such. Useful life span is an estimation and is influenced by factors such as technological progress and regulatory conditions, among other things. In relation to lignite mining and generation, the decommissioning data from the Act on Coal Phaseout are taken into consideration in determining the useful life spans.
Upon first-time consolidation of an acquired company, the identifiable assets, liabilities and contingent liabilities are recognised at fair value. Determination of the fair value is based on valuation procedures which require a projection of anticipated future cash flows.
Deferred tax assets are recognised if the realisation of future tax benefits is probable. However, the actual future realisability of tax benefits and thus the recoverability of deferred tax assets may deviate from the estimation made when the deferred taxes are capitalised. For additional information on assumptions and estimates in relation to the recognition of deferred tax assets, see (16) Deferred taxes.
Estimations in relation to the tax situation must also be made for the measurement of uncertain income tax items, in particular the amount of taxable income and the use of tax loss carryforwards (see (24) Income tax liabilities).
Additional information on the assumptions and estimates upon which these consolidated financial statements are based can be found in the explanations of the individual items.
All assumptions and estimates are based on valuation methods and input factors. These include climate-related assumptions on the development of prices for $\mathrm{CO}_{2}$ allowances, the
useful life spans of conventional power stations or for the expansion of the hydrogen economy. These, in turn, are based on the circumstances and forecasts prevailing on the balance-sheet date. Furthermore, as of the balance-sheet date, realistic assessments of overall economic conditions in the sectors and regions in which RWE conducts operations are taken into consideration with regard to the prospective development of business. Actual amounts may deviate from the estimated amounts if the estimated parameters develop differently than expected. In such cases, the assumptions, and, if necessary, the carrying amounts of the affected assets and liabilities are adjusted.
The changes to the framework for renewable energy facilities that occurred in January 2025 (see (34) Events after the balance-sheet date) result in elevated uncertainty with regard to the assumptions used in the standard impairment test for the goodwill of the cashgenerating unit RWE Clean Energy (see (10) Intangible assets). In connection with this, there is also elevated uncertainty about the US joint venture Community Offshore Wind, LLC, Wilmington, USA, which is an investment accounted for using the equity method (see (12) Investments accounted for using the equity method).
Furthermore, as of the date of preparation of the consolidated financial statements, it is not presumed that there will be any material changes compared to the assumptions and accounting estimates.
Capital management. The focus of RWE's financing policy is on ensuring uninterrupted access to the capital market. The goal is to be in a position to refinance maturing debts and finance the operating activities at all times. Maintaining a solid rating and a positive operating cash flow from continuing activities serve this purpose.
The management of RWE's capital structure is oriented towards a leverage factor of three or less. This indicator is calculated by adding material non-current provisions, with the exception of mining provisions, to net financial debt and comparing the resulting figure to
the adjusted EBITDA of the core business. RWE's liabilities of relevance to net debt primarily consist of (hybrid) bonds, commercial paper, tax equity liabilities, short-term borrowing and provisions for pensions, nuclear waste management and wind and solar farms.
In the reporting period, it was primarily cash flows from continuing operations that had a positive effect on the RWE Group's net debt, while high capital expenditure on property, plant and equipment, especially in the segments Offshore Wind and Onshore Wind / Solar, resulted in a significant increase in net debt during the period. As of 31 December 2024, net financial debt amounted to $€ 4.1$ billion and was thus higher than at the end of 2023 (net financial assets of $€ 0.8$ billion). Furthermore, net debt provisions declined by $€ 0.4$ billion to $€ 7.1$ billion (previous year: $€ 7.4$ billion). On average, provisions have a very long duration; their level is primarily determined by external factors such as the general level of interest rates. A precise calculation of net debt/net cash and net financial debt/assets is presented on page 55 of the management report. In total, as of 31 December 2024, RWE's net debt amounted to $€ 11.2$ billion (previous year: $€ 6.6$ billion). As of 31 December 2023, the leverage factor was 2.0 (previous year: 0.9) and was thus well below the planned ceiling.
RWE's credit rating is influenced by a number of qualitative and quantitative factors. These include aspects such as the amount of cash flows and debt as well as market conditions, competition and the political and regulatory framework. Our hybrid bonds also have a positive effect on our rating. The rating agency Moody's classifies part of hybrid capital as equity.
In October and November 2024, the rating agencies Moody's and Fitch both confirmed their credit ratings for RWE. RWE's long-term creditworthiness is now classified as Baa2 (Moody's) and BBB+ (Fitch), with a stable outlook. RWE's short-term credit ratings are unchanged versus the previous year at P-2 (Moody's) and F1 (Fitch).
The International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) has approved several amendments to existing IFRSs, which are effective for the RWE Group as of fiscal 2024 due to EU endorsement:
These new regulations do not have any material effects on the RWE Group's consolidated financial statements.
Correction in the reporting of realised hedges from emission allowances in accordance with IAS 8.42. The change in the reporting of realised hedges from emission allowances resulted in a reduction of $€ 2,995$ million in the cost of materials and other operating result; there is no effect on earnings.
Additionally, the following changes pursuant to IAS 8 occurred during the reporting period.
Change in the measurement of tax loss carryforwards in the USA. Starting from this reporting year, in the US tax group, surplus deferred tax liabilities are taken into consideration when reviewing the value of deferred tax assets, whereas in the past only the future taxable income was taken into account. Retroactive adjustment of the prior-year figures results in the following changes:
| Items $€$ million |
Adjustment prior year |
|---|---|
| Taxes on income | -72 |
| Deferred taxes (income statement) | -72 |
| Income | 72 |
| Net income/income attributable to RWE AG shareholders | 72 |
| Basic and diluted earnings per share in $€$ | 0.10 |
| Other comprehensive income from currency translation | -15 |
| Gross amount of deferred tax assets | 446 |
| Netting amount of deferred tax assets and liabilities | 446 |
| Deferred tax liabilities (balance sheet) as of 1 Jan 2023 | -389 |
| Deferred tax liabilities (balance sheet) as of 31 Dec 2023 | -446 |
| Equity as of 1 Jan 2023 | 389 |
| Equity as of 31 Dec 2023 | 446 |
Change in the accounting treatment of the German capacity reserve. In the past, the provision of reserve capacity from RWE power plants within the framework of the German capacity reserve system was accounted for as an executory contract. As these power stations no longer participate in the regular electricity market and are only used when necessary at the request of the transmission system operator to ensure grid stability, they are to be accounted for as a finance lease pursuant to IFRS 16, with RWE in the role of the lessor. Adjustment of the prior-year figures has the following effects:
| Items € million |
Adjustment prior year |
|---|---|
| Revenue (including natural gas tax/electricity tax) | -45 |
| Revenue | -45 |
| Depreciation, amortisation and impairment losses | -1 |
| Income from investments accounted for using the equity method | 4 |
| Income before financial result and tax | -40 |
| Financial income | 33 |
| Income before tax | -7 |
| Income | -7 |
| Basic and diluted earnings per shore in € | -0.01 |
| Cash flows from operating activities | -12 |
| Cash flows from investing activities | 12 |
| Property, plant and equipment | -1 |
| Carrying amount of investments accounted for using the equity method | -4 |
| Financial receivables (current) | 23 |
| Equity as of 1 Jan 2023 | 25 |
| Equity as of 31 Dec 2023 | 18 |
Changes in presentation of the cash flow statement. In addition to the change in the accounting treatment of the German capacity reserve, the following changes were made in the presentation of the cash flow statement, leading to an economically more accurate and relevant presentation of certain items:
Adjustment of the prior-year figures has the following effects on items in the cash flow statement:
| Items | Prior-year figure before restatement | Change in the accounting treatment of the German capacity reserve | Change in impairment assessment of US loss carryforwards | Changes in presentation | Adjusted prior-year figure |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| € million | |||||
| Income | 1,597 | $-7$ | 72 | - | 1,662 |
| Changes in deferred taxes | 1,961 | - | $-72$ | - | 1,889 |
| Other non-cash income / expenses and cash issues | $-4,451$ | $-5$ | - | 3,646 | $-810$ |
| Changes in working capital | $-22$ | - | - | $-3,646$ | $-3,668$ |
| Cash flows from operating activities | 4,235 | $-12$ | - | - | 4,223 |
| Changes in marketable securities and cash investments | 6,007 | 12 | - | $-6,019$ | - |
| Cash-out for marketable securities and cash investments | - | - | - | $-6,413$ | $-6,413$ |
| Proceeds from marketable securities and cash investments | - | - | - | 12,432 | 12,432 |
| Cash flows from investing activities | $-2,810$ | 12 | - | - | $-2,798$ |
| Capital changes (incl. non-controlling interests) | $-38$ | - | - | 38 | - |
| Capital increases (incl. non-controlling interests) | - | - | - | 1 | 1 |
| Capital decreases (incl. non-controlling interests) | - | - | - | $-39$ | $-39$ |
| Issuance of financial debt | 36,909 | - | - | $-29,362$ | 7,547 |
| Repayment of financial debt | $-37,485$ | - | - | 29,362 | $-8,123$ |
Change in the reporting of commodity derivative maturities. Starting from this reporting year, the only commodity derivatives reported as current in the balance sheet are ones which are concluded as exchange transactions or for own-use purposes. For all other commodity derivatives, maturity is reported in accordance with the term of the respective transaction. This change in reporting leads to an economically more accurate and relevant presentation of the transactions involved. Retroactive adjustment of the prior-year figures for 31 December 2023 resulted in an increase in non-current derivatives/decrease in current derivatives in the amount of $€ 3,383$ million under assets, and an increase in noncurrent derivatives/decrease in current derivatives in the amount of $€ 1,176$ million under equity and liabilities.
The IASB issued further standards and amendments to standards, which were not yet mandatory in the EU in fiscal 2024. With the exception of IFRS 18 and Amendments to IFRS 9 and IFRS 7 Contracts Referencing Nature-dependent Electricity, the following amendments to standards are not expected to have any material effects on RWE's consolidated financial statements:
In April 2024, the IASB published IFRS 18 (Presentation and Disclosure in Financial Statements), which - pending EU endorsement - is applicable for fiscal years starting from 1 January 2027 and will replace IAS 1 (Presentation of Financial Statements). In general, the new regulations in IFRS 18 result in changes in the disclosure of the main components of the financial statements as well as additional disclosures in the notes in relation to certain performance indicators which are published in the financial statements. The specific impacts of IFRS 18 on the RWE Group's consolidated financial statements are currently being reviewed.
In December 2024, the IASB published amendments to IFRS 9 and IFRS 7 in relation to the accounting treatment of electricity purchase contracts related to nature-dependent electricity (Amendments to IFRS 9 and IFRS 7 Contracts Referencing Nature-dependent Electricity). The new regulations contain clarifications on the application of the own-use exemption and provisions permitting the use of such contracts as a hedging instrument under certain conditions. The amendments become effective for fiscal years starting on or after 1 January 2026. Possible impacts on the RWE Group's consolidated financial statements are currently being reviewed.
Revenue is recorded when the customer has obtained control over goods or services.
We recognise income from the sale of the electricity generated by all of RWE Group's generation technologies and the consumer business in revenue. Revenue from the commercial optimisation of generation dispatch and business with end customers in Supply \& Trading is based, when possible, on the net sale price, after deduction of the relevant material costs. By contrast, all other revenue from generation activities and the end-customer business outside of the Supply \& Trading segment is reported on a gross basis.
In the year under review, RWE generated reportable external revenue of $€ 3,344$ million with one large customer in the Supply \& Trading segment (previous year: $€ 6,258$ million).
A breakdown of revenue by division, geographical region and product is contained in the segment reporting on pages 276 et seqq.
The line item 'natural gas tax/electricity tax' comprises the taxes paid directly by Group companies.
Certain performance obligations of the RWE Group were not yet or not yet fully met by the end of the fiscal year. The $€ 1,483$ million in revenue due from these performance obligations (previous year: $€ 1,437$ million) is expected to be received over the following three years. The receipt of this revenue will depend on when these performance obligations to the customer are met. It does not include future revenue from contracts with an original contractual term of twelve months or less.
Of the contract liabilities included in the opening balance, $€ 43$ million (previous year: $€ 135$ million) was recognised as revenue.
| Other operating income $€$ million |
2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|
| Income from own work capitalised | 382 | 169 |
| Income from release of provisions | 1,086 | 60 |
| Cost allocations/refunds | 139 | 101 |
| Income from disposal and write-back of non-current assets | ||
| including income from deconsolidation | 463 | 330 |
| Income from derivative financial instruments | 2,120 | 1,280 |
| Compensation and insurance benefits | 17 | 27 |
| Gains on disposals from finance leases | 58 | 120 |
| Income from tax equity contracts | 512 | 423 |
| Currency gains | 51 | - |
| Income from contracts for differences | 184 | 67 |
| Miscellaneous | 542 | 552 |
| $\mathbf{5 , 5 5 4}$ | $\mathbf{3 , 1 2 9}$ |
To improve the presentation of the development of business, unrealised and realised gains from contracts measured at fair value in the Supply \& Trading segment are stated as a net amount in income from derivative financial instruments. In the year under review, net income totalled $€ 2,081$ million (previous year: $€ 694$ million).
The amount of income from derivative financial instrument was mainly influenced by the volatility of commodity market prices.
Income from the disposal of non-current financial assets and loans is disclosed under income from investments if it relates to investments (see Note (7) Income from investments); otherwise it is recorded as part of the financial result as is the income from the disposal of current marketable securities (see Note (8) Financial result).
| Cost of materials $€$ million | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost of raw materials and of goods for resale | 13,840 | 15,348 |
| Cost of purchased services | 1,563 | 1,797 |
| Expenses from contracts for differences | 5 | 14 |
| 15,408 | 17,159 |
The cost of materials primarily includes expenses for the input materials of conventional power plants.
| Staff costs $€$ million |
2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|
| Wages and salaries | 2,487 | 2,486 |
| Social security payments | 320 | 288 |
| Support benefits | 31 | 28 |
| Cost of pensions | 123 | 114 |
| $\mathbf{2 , 9 6 1}$ | $\mathbf{2 , 9 1 6}$ |
Social security payments primarily include contributions to state plans in the sense of IAS 19.
| Number of employees (annual average) |
2024 | 2023 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Number of employees |
In full-time equivalents |
Number of employees |
In full-time equivalents |
|
| Employees covered by collective agreements and other employees |
11,361 | 11,135 | 11,400 | 11,179 |
| Employees not covered by collective agreements |
9,910 | 9,733 | 8,724 | 8,570 |
| $\mathbf{2 1 , 2 7 1}$ | $\mathbf{2 0 , 8 6 8}$ | $\mathbf{2 0 , 1 2 4}$ | $\mathbf{1 9 , 7 4 9}$ |
The headcount figures do not include trainees. On average, 624 trainees were employed (previous year: 639). This corresponds to the figure calculated in full-time equivalents. As in the previous years, executive personnel are included in the number of employees who are not covered by collective agreements.
(5) Depreciation, amortisation and impairment losses
| Depreciation, amortisation and impairment losses € million |
2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|
| Intangible assets | 538 | 327 |
| Property, plant and equipment | 2,696 | 3,497 |
| $\mathbf{3 , 2 3 4}$ | $\mathbf{3 , 8 2 4}$ |
The following impairments were included in depreciation, amortisation and impairment losses:
| Impairments € million |
2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|
| Intangible assets | 197 | 20 |
| Property, plant and equipment | 1,162 | 1,903 |
| $\mathbf{1 , 3 5 9}$ | $\mathbf{1 , 9 2 3}$ |
During the period under review, the impairment test for the cash-generating unit (CGU) Dutch Power Plant Portfolio resulted in a write-down of $€ 654$ million on property, plant and equipment and $€ 10$ million on intangible assets (recoverable amount: $€ 0.2$ billion). In the previous year, a write-down of $€ 632$ million was recognised on property, plant and equipment (recoverable amount: $€ 0.7$ billion). As in the previous year, the reason for this was the deterioration in market conditions in the Netherlands. The CGU Dutch Power Plant Portfolio includes the gas-fired and biomass/ coal-fired power plants in the Netherlands. The newly acquired gas-fired plant Magnum has also been part of this CGU since the previous year.
Due to a reduction in future feed-in payments, a write-down of $€ 247$ million was recognised on property, plant and equipment for offshore wind farms in Germany (Offshore Wind
segment) during the reporting period (recoverable amount: $€ 0.7$ billion). For the same reasons, impairments of $€ 111$ million were recognised in the previous year on property, plant and equipment for offshore wind farms in Germany (Offshore Wind segment) due to reduced future feed-in tariffs (recoverable amount: $€ 0.9$ billion). In addition to this, during the reporting period an impairment of $€ 85$ million on property, plant and equipment was recorded in Offshore Wind, as a result of development projects that were terminated, mainly in Sweden, France, South Korea, Japan, Norway and the Netherlands. In the previous year, an impairment of $€ 52$ million on property, plant and equipment had been recorded in this segment, as a result of terminated development projects in Taiwan and Poland.
In the previous year, the required impairment test in the Phaseout Technologies segment (previously Coal/Nuclear) resulted in impairments amounting to $€ 917$ million on property, plant and equipment and $€ 5$ million on intangible assets for the CGU Nord-Süd-Bahn (recoverable amount: - €0.6 billion) and amounting to $€ 132$ million on property, plant and equipment for the CGU Inden (recoverable amount: $€ 0.0$ billion). The CGU Nord-Süd-Bahn includes the Niederaußem and Neurath power stations, the Hambach and Garzweiler opencast mines and the refining operations. The CGU Inden includes the Weisweiler power station and the Inden opencast mine. The impairment was mainly justified by last year's much lower market prices for electricity and the associated sharp decline in clean lignite spreads compared to the extremely high prices seen in the year before last.
Other impairments on intangible assets and property, plant and equipment were recognised primarily on the basis of cost increases, changes in price expectations and cancelled development projects.
Recoverable amounts are generally determined on the basis of fair values less costs to sell; in the segments Onshore Wind/Solar and Offshore Wind, they are also determined on the basis of values in use. Fair values are determined using valuation models based on planned cash flows. During the reporting period, the valuation models were based on (after-tax) discount rates that ranged from $4.75 \%$ to $5.75 \%$ (previous year: $5.00 \%$ to $6.00 \%)$. Our key planning assumptions relate to the development of wholesale prices of
electricity, natural gas, coal and $\mathrm{CO}_{2}$ emission allowances, as well as regulatory framework conditions. Based on the use of internal planning assumptions, the determined fair values are assigned to Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy.
(6) Other operating expenses
| Other operating expenses $€$ million |
2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|
| Expenses from changes in product inventories | 20 | - |
| Maintenance and renewal obligations | 528 | 494 |
| Additions to provisions/reversals | - | 1,595 |
| Legal and other consulting and data processing services | 470 | 577 |
| Insurance, commissions, freight and similar distribution costs | 114 | 110 |
| General administration | 134 | 138 |
| Expenses from derivative financial instruments | 371 | 359 |
| Exchange rate losses | - | 109 |
| Other taxes/levies | 167 | 150 |
| Miscellaneous | 403 | 346 |
| 2,207 | 3,878 |
The amount of expenses from derivative financial instruments was mainly influenced by the volatility of commodity market prices.
Income from investments includes all income and expenses which have arisen in relation to operating investments. It is comprised of income from investments accounted for using the equity method and other income from investments.
| Income from investments $€$ million |
2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|
| Income from investments accounted for using the equity method | 406 | 565 |
| Income from non-consolidated subsidiaries | $-30$ | 7 |
| Income from other investments | 7 | $-23$ |
| Income from the disposal of investments | $-24$ | 1 |
| Income from loans to investments | 2 | 19 |
| Other income from investments | $-45$ | 4 |
| 361 | 569 |
| Financial result $€$ million |
2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|
| Interest and similar income ${ }^{1}$ | 781 | 866 |
| Other financial income | 1,713 | 1,608 |
| Financial income | 2,494 | 2,474 |
| Interest and similar expenses | 847 | 1,011 |
| Interest accretion to | ||
| Provisions for pensions and similar obligations (including capitalised surplus of plan assets) | 22 | 3 |
| Provisions for nuclear waste management as well as to mining provisions | 131 | 395 |
| Other provisions | 104 | 212 |
| Other finance costs | 1,376 | 1,296 |
| Finance costs | 2,480 | 2,917 |
| 14 | $-443$ |
1 Prior-year figure restated due to the change in the accounting treatment of the German capacity reserve; see pages 211 et seq.
Interest accretion to provisions contains the annual amounts of accrued interest and the effects of changes in real interest rates. In the case of provisions for pensions, it is reduced by the imputed interest income on plan assets for the coverage of pension obligations.
Interest expenses incurred for lease liabilities amounted to $€ 87$ million in the year under review (previous year: $€ 65$ million).
Net interest essentially includes interest income from interest-bearing securities and loans, income and expenses relating to securities, and interest expenses.
Interest income includes dividend income of $€ 210$ million from the $15 \%$ stake in E.ON (previous year: $€ 202$ million).
In the year under review, $€ 217$ million in borrowing costs were capitalised as costs in connection with the acquisition, construction or production of qualifying assets (previous year: $€ 56$ million). The underlying capitalisation rate ranged from $3.9 \%$ to $4.3 \%$ (previous year: from $2.4 \%$ to $3.5 \%$ ).
| Net interest | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|
| $€$ million | 781 | 866 |
| Interest and similar income ${ }^{1}$ | 847 | 1,011 |
| Interest and similar expenses | -66 | -145 |
1 Prior-year figure restated due to the change in the accounting treatment of the German capacity reserve; see pages 211 et seq.
Net interest stems from financial assets and liabilities, which were allocated to the following measurement categories pursuant to IFRS 9:
| Interest result by category $€$ million |
2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|
| Debt instruments measured at amortised cost ${ }^{1}$ | 412 | 658 |
| Financial instruments measured at fair value through profit or loss |
154 | 3 |
| Debt instruments measured at fair value through other comprehensive income |
5 | 3 |
| Equity instruments measured at fair value through other comprehensive income |
210 | 202 |
| Financial liabilities measured at amortised cost | -847 | -1,011 |
| -66 | -145 |
Other financial income and finance costs mainly involve fair value changes and the realisation of derivatives as well as non-derivative financial instruments.
As the reporting of the unrealised and realised fair value changes of derivatives follows the reporting of the underlying transactions hedged using the derivatives, effects from financial derivatives related to financing, such as currency swaps or interest rate swaps, are stated in the financial result.
(9) Taxes on income
| Taxes on income € million |
2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|
| Current taxes on income | 714 | 447 |
| Deferred taxes¹ | 340 | 1,890 |
| from temporary differences | 507 | 1,487 |
| from tax loss carryforwards¹ | -167 | 403 |
| $\mathbf{1 , 0 5 4}$ | $\mathbf{2 , 3 3 7}$ |
1 Prior-year figure restated; see page 211.
In the year under review, changes in valuation allowances for deferred tax assets stemming from temporary differences were recognised in the amount of -€350 million (previous year: €946 million) and in the amount of -€367 million (previous year: €543 million) from loss carryforwards.
Current taxes on income contain €31 million in net tax expenses (previous year: income of €59 million) relating to prior periods.
Due to the utilisation of tax loss carryforwards unrecognised in prior years, current taxes on income were reduced by €275 million (previous year: €5 million).
Expenses from deferred taxes declined by €20 million (previous year: €1 million) due to reassessments of and previously unrecognised tax loss carryforwards.
| Income taxes recognised in other comprehensive income ${ }^{1}$ € million |
2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|
| Fair valuation of equity instruments | -14 | - |
| Fair valuation of financial instruments used for hedging purposes |
2,101 | $-2,237$ |
| Actuarial gains and losses of defined benefit pension plans and similar obligations |
102 | -163 |
| $\mathbf{2 , 1 8 9}$ | $\mathbf{- 2 , 4 0 0}$ |
1 Including valuation allowances.
Taxes in the amount of - €91 million (previous year: €985 million) were offset directly against equity.
| Tax reconciliation € million | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|
| Income before tax ${ }^{1}$ | 6,343 | 3,999 |
| Theoretical tax expense ${ }^{1}$ | 2,070 | 1,305 |
| Differences to foreign tax rates | $-169$ | $-221$ |
| Tax effects on | ||
| Tax-free dividends | $-196$ | $-153$ |
| Other tax-free income | $-106$ | $-97$ |
| Expenses not deductible for tax purposes | 214 | 142 |
| Accounting for associates using the equity method (including impairment losses on associates' goodwill) | $-65$ | $-91$ |
| Unutilisable loss carryforwards, utilisation of unrecognised loss carryforwards, write-downs/write-backs of loss carryforwards ${ }^{1}$ | $-205$ | 660 |
| Income on the disposal of investments | $-1$ | $-10$ |
| Changes in tax rates | - | $-4$ |
| Change in allowances for deferred taxes from temporary differences | $-350$ | 932 |
| Other ${ }^{1}$ | $-138$ | $-126$ |
| Effective tax expense ${ }^{1}$ | 1,054 | 2,337 |
| Effective tax rate in \% ${ }^{1}$ | 16.6 | 58.4 |
The theoretical tax expense is calculated using the tax rate for the RWE Group of 32.6\% (previous year: $32.6 \%$ ). This is derived from the prevailing $15 \%$ corporate tax rate, the solidarity surcharge of $5.5 \%$, and the Group's average local trade tax rate.
The RWE Group falls in the scope of the OECD model rules (BEPS Pillar 2) and is applying the exemption for the recognition and disclosure of information on deferred tax assets and liabilities in relation to income taxes in the second pillar. As of 31 December 2024, the Group reports a top-up tax of $€ 0$ million.
| Intangible assets $€$ million |
Development costs | Concessions, potent rights, licences and similar rights | Customer relationships and similar assets | Goodwill | Advances paid | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cost | ||||||
| Balance at 1 Jan 2024 | 27 | 5,501 | 2,577 | 4,447 | 24 | 12,576 |
| Additions/disposals due to changes in the scope of consolidation | - | 612 | - | 8 | - | 620 |
| Additions | 12 | 6 | - | - | 3 | 21 |
| Transfers | - | 13 | $-53$ | - | $-14$ | $-54$ |
| Currency translation adjustments | - | 162 | 156 | 141 | - | 459 |
| Disposals | - | 14 | - | - | 1 | 15 |
| Balance at 31 Dec 2024 | 39 | 6,080 | 2,680 | 4,596 | 12 | 13,407 |
| Accumulated amortisation/impairment losses | ||||||
| Balance at 1 Jan 2024 | 26 | 2,417 | 145 | - | 1 | 2,589 |
| Amortisation/impairment losses in the reporting period | 2 | 255 | 280 | - | 1 | 538 |
| Transfers | - | $-6$ | $-5$ | - | - | $-11$ |
| Currency translation adjustments | 1 | 32 | 20 | - | $-2$ | 51 |
| Disposals | - | 10 | - | - | - | 10 |
| Balance at 31 Dec 2024 | 29 | 2,688 | 440 | - | - | 3,157 |
| Carrying amounts | ||||||
| Balance at 31 Dec 2024 | 10 | 3,392 | 2,240 | 4,596 | 12 | 10,250 |
| Intangible assets | Development costs | Concessions, potent rights, licences and similar rights |
Customer relationships and similar assets |
Goodwill | Advances paid | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| € million | ||||||
| Cost | ||||||
| Balance at 1 Jan 2023 | 26 | 4,943 | 155 | 2,800 | 17 | 7,941 |
| Additions/disposals due to changes in the scope of consolidation | - | 277 | 2,523 | 1,678 | $-1$ | 4,477 |
| Additions | - | 18 | - | - | 16 | 34 |
| Transfers | - | 5 | - | - | $-8$ | $-3$ |
| Currency translation adjustments | 1 | 61 | $-101$ | $-31$ | - | $-70$ |
| Disposals | - | 3 | - | - | - | 3 |
| Balance at 31 Dec 2023 | 27 | 5,301 | 2,577 | 4,447 | 24 | 12,376 |
| Accumulated amortisation/impairment losses | ||||||
| Balance at 1 Jan 2023 | 25 | 2,220 | 28 | - | - | 2,273 |
| Additions/disposals due to changes in the scope of consolidation | - | $-16$ | - | - | - | $-16$ |
| Amortisation/impairment losses in the reporting period | 1 | 205 | 121 | - | - | 327 |
| Currency translation adjustments | - | 10 | $-4$ | - | 1 | 7 |
| Disposals | - | 2 | - | - | - | 2 |
| Balance at 31 Dec 2023 | 26 | 2,417 | 145 | - | 1 | 2,589 |
| Carrying amounts | ||||||
| Balance at 31 Dec 2023 | 1 | 2,884 | 2,432 | 4,447 | 23 | 9,787 |
In the reporting period, the RWE Group's total expenditures on research and development amounted to $€ 18$ million (previous year: $€ 17$ million).
Goodwill breaks down as follows:
| Goodwill € million |
31 Dec 2024 | 31 Dec 2023 |
|---|---|---|
| Offshore Wind | 1,462 | 1,415 |
| RWE Clean Energy | 1,528 | 1,436 |
| Onshore Wind/Solar Europe\&Australia | 495 | 485 |
| Flexible Generation (previously Hydro/Biomass/Gas) | 105 | 105 |
| Supply\& Trading | 1,006 | 1,006 |
| 4,596 | 4,447 |
In the reporting period, the first-time consolidation of the three development projects Norfolk Vanguard West, Norfolk Vanguard East and Norfolk Boreas resulted in the creation of a preliminary difference of $€ 8$ million, which was assigned to the cash-generating unit (CGU) Offshore Wind. The intra-year changes in the CGU result from currency translation differences.
In the previous year, goodwill of $€ 1,495$ million was created from the first-time consolidation of Con Edison Clean Energy Businesses and of $€ 183$ million from the first-time consolidation of the UK developer JBM Solar. Last year, these goodwill amounts were assigned to the CGUs RWE Clean Energy and Onshore Wind/Solar Europe\&Australia, respectively. The goodwill previously assigned to the operating segment Onshore Wind/Solar was allocated in full to the CGU Onshore Wind/Solar Europe\&Australia in the previous year.
A regular impairment test is performed in the fourth quarter of each fiscal year, to determine if there is any need to write down goodwill. As part of this, goodwill is allocated to the CGUs.
The recoverable amount of the CGU is determined, which is defined as the higher of fair value less costs to sell or value in use. Fair value is the best estimate of the price that an independent third party would pay to purchase the CGU as of the balance-sheet date. Value in use reflects the present value of the future cash flows which are expected to be generated with the CGU.
Fair value less costs to sell is assessed from an external perspective and value in use from a company-internal perspective. Values are determined using a business valuation model, based on planned future cash flows. These cash flows, in turn, are based on the mediumand long-term business plans, as approved by the Executive Board and valid at the time of the impairment test. They pertain to a detailed planning period of three to ten years, the latter specifically for the segments Offshore Wind, RWE Clean Energy and Onshore Wind / Solar Europe \& Australia, due to the growth business. The cash flow plans are based on experience as well as on expected market trends in the future. If available, market transactions in the same sector or third-party valuations are taken as a basis for determining fair value. Based on the use of internal planning assumptions, the determined fair values less costs to sell are assigned to Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy.
The key planning assumptions in the medium- and long-term business plans mainly relate to the development of prices for electricity, $\mathrm{CO}_{2}$ emission allowances, natural gas and coal. Additionally, assumptions regarding the development of key economic indicators such as exchange rates, gross domestic product and inflation are also incorporated. Market data is used as much as possible for the medium-term planning, while fundamental models are deployed for long-term planning. The results of macro-economic and financial studies and forecasts are also used as benchmarks. The key planning assumptions determined in this way are updated to reflect current market conditions every six months.
For the segments Offshore Wind, RWE Clean Energy and Onshore Wind / Solar Europe \& Australia, the valuation is based on a normal wind year, which is calculated as the average of the last 20 years.
The after-tax discount rates used for business valuations are determined on the basis of market data. During the period under review, they were $6.75 \%$ for the CGU Supply \& Trading (previous year: $6.75 \%$ ), $6.50 \%$ for Offshore Wind (previous year: $6.25 \%$ ), $5.25 \%$ for RWE Clean Energy (previous year: $5.25 \%$ ), $5.75 \%$ for Onshore Wind / Solar Europe \& Australia (previous year: $6.25 \%$ ) and $6.00 \%$ for Flexible Generation (previous year: $6.25 \%$ ).
For the segments Offshore Wind, RWE Clean Energy and Onshore Wind / Solar Europe \& Australia, we used a growth rate of $1.50 \%$ (previous year: $1.25 \%$ ) as a basis for extrapolating future cash flows going beyond the detailed planning period. For the CGU Supply \& Trading, we used a growth rate of $0.00 \%$ (previous year: $0.50 \%$ ). We did not use a growth rate as a basis for the CGU Flexible Generation. The growth rate for each segment is generally derived from experience and expectations of the future and does not exceed the longterm average growth rates of the respective markets in which the Group companies are active. The annual cash flows assumed for the years after the detailed planning period include as a deduction capital expenditure in the amount necessary to maintain the scope of business.
The value in use was taken as the basis for the recoverable amount of the CGU Supply \& Trading. The pre-tax discount rate was $8.77 \%$ (previous year: $8.77 \%$ ). The recoverable amounts of the other CGUs were determined as the fair value less costs to sell. As of the balance-sheet date, all of the recoverable amounts were higher than the carrying amounts. The surpluses react especially sensitively to changes in the discount rate and the growth rate, insofar as such are used in the model.
The recoverable amount of the CGU Clean Energy was $€ 4.1$ billion higher than the carrying amount. This surplus would have been exhausted if the calculations had used a discount rate of $5.88 \%$ or a growth rate of $0.69 \%$.
(11) Property, plant and equipment
| Property, plant and equipment | Land, land rights and buildings on third-party land | Technical plant and machinery | Other equipment, factory and office equipment | Advances paid | Plants under construction | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| € million | ||||||
| Cost | ||||||
| Balance at 1 Jan 2024 | 6,922 | 55,294 | 976 | 836 | 6,872 | 70,900 |
| Additions/disposals due to changes in the scope of consolidation | 6 | $-10$ | - | - | 643 | 639 |
| Additions | 435 | 1,291 | 72 | 545 | 8,256 | 10,599 |
| Transfers | 62 | 2,546 | 10 | - | $-2,471$ | 147 |
| Currency translation adjustments | 101 | 1,089 | 6 | - | 412 | 1,608 |
| Disposals | 334 | 3,749 | 42 | 40 | 821 | 4,986 |
| IAS 29 adjustments | 1 | 162 | 1 | - | - | 164 |
| Balance at 31 Dec 2024 | 7,193 | 56,623 | 1,023 | 1,341 | 12,891 | 79,071 |
| Accumulated depreciation/impairment losses | ||||||
| Balance at 1 Jan 2024 | 4,028 | 36,185 | 882 | 330 | 667 | 42,092 |
| Additions/disposals due to changes in the scope of consolidation | 4 | $-11$ | - | - | 7 | - |
| Amortisation/impairment losses in the reporting period ${ }^{1}$ | 252 | 2,289 | 67 | - | 262 | 2,870 |
| Transfers | 5 | 38 | 3 | - | $-33$ | 13 |
| Currency translation adjustments | 20 | 255 | 4 | - | 2 | 281 |
| Disposals | 287 | 3,596 | 41 | - | 770 | 4,694 |
| Write-backs | 24 | 33 | - | - | 2 | 59 |
| IAS 29 adjustments | - | 110 | - | - | - | 110 |
| Balance at 31 Dec 2024 | 3,998 | 35,237 | 915 | 330 | 133 | 40,613 |
| Carrying amounts | ||||||
| Balance at 31 Dec 2024 | 3,195 | 21,386 | 108 | 1,011 | 12,758 | 38,458 |
1 In part from the use of provisions for onerous contracts for purchase commitments.
| Property, plant and equipment | Land, land rights and buildings on third-party land | Technical plant and machinery ${ }^{2}$ | Other equipment, factory and office equipment | Advances paid | Plants under construction | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| € million | |||||||
| Cost | |||||||
| Balance at 1 Jan 2023 | 6,307 | 57,148 | 1,057 | 463 | 4,432 | 69,407 | |
| Additions/disposals due to changes in the scope of consolidation | 363 | 2,202 | $-98$ | 6 | 586 | 3,059 | |
| Additions | 341 | 1,479 | 68 | 88 | 3,504 | 5,480 | |
| Transfers | 68 | 1,251 | $-10$ | 278 | $-1,584$ | 3 | |
| Currency translation adjustments | $-5$ | $-123$ | $-1$ | 1 | $-53$ | $-181$ | |
| Disposals | 153 | 6,821 | 41 | - | 12 | 7,027 | |
| IAS 29 adjustments | 1 | 158 | 1 | - | $-1$ | 159 | |
| Balance at 31 Dec 2023 | 6,922 | 55,294 | 976 | 836 | 6,872 | 70,900 | |
| Accumulated depreciation/impairment losses | |||||||
| Balance at 1 Jan 2023 | 3,696 | 40,252 | 861 | 330 | 521 | 45,660 | |
| Additions/disposals due to changes in the scope of consolidation | $-45$ | $-305$ | $-78$ | - | $-1$ | $-429$ | |
| Amortisation/impairment losses in the reporting period ${ }^{1}$ | 492 | 2,837 | 144 | - | 172 | 3,645 | |
| Transfers | 1 | 23 | $-6$ | - | $-18$ | - | |
| Currency translation adjustments | 5 | $-24$ | 1 | - | $-1$ | $-19$ | |
| Disposals | 112 | 6,702 | 40 | - | 6 | 6,860 | |
| Write-backs | 9 | 14 | - | - | - | 23 | |
| IAS 29 adjustments | - | 118 | - | - | - | 118 | |
| Balance at 31 Dec 2023 | 4,028 | 36,185 | 882 | 330 | 667 | 42,092 | |
| Carrying amounts | |||||||
| Balance at 31 Dec 2023 | 2,894 | 19,109 | 94 | 506 | 6,205 | 28,808 |
1 In part from the use of provisions for onerous contracts for purchase commitments.
2 Some prior-year figures restated due to the change in the accounting treatment of the German capacity reserve; see pages 211 et seq.
Property, plant and equipment in the amount of $€ 1,332$ million (previous year: $€ 1,348$ million) was subject to restrictions from land charges, chattel mortgages or other restrictions. Disposals of property, plant and equipment resulted from sale or decommissioning.
Property, plant and equipment includes legally owned assets as well as right-of-use assets from leases of which RWE is the lessee.
These leases primarily comprise long-term rights of use to leased office buildings and land (e.g. leaseholds, properties for green electricity production) and rights of use to leased assets relating to vehicle fleets and power plants.
The following table shows the development of right-of-use assets recognised in property, plant and equipment:
| Right-of-use assets Development in 2024 € million |
Balance at 1 Jan 2024 |
Additions | Depreciation, amortisation and impairments | Disposals | Other changes ${ }^{1}$ | Balance at 31 Dec 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cost | ||||||
| Buildings | 299 | 33 | 35 | 2 | 5 | 300 |
| Land | 1,174 | 287 | 119 | 7 | 59 | 1,394 |
| Technical plant and machinery | 2 | 3 | 3 | - | - | 2 |
| Pumped storage power stations | 245 | 6 | 14 | - | $-1$ | 236 |
| Vehicle fleet | 6 | 14 | 13 | - | - | 7 |
| Ships | 34 | 45 | 29 | - | 2 | 52 |
| Other plant, factory and office equipment | 3 | 11 | 12 | - | - | 2 |
| 1,763 | 399 | 225 | 9 | 65 | 1,993 |
1 Other changes comprise transfers, write-backs, currency translation adjustments as well as additions and disposals in the scope of consolidation.
| Right-of-use assets Development in 2023 € million |
Balance at 1 Jan 2023 | Additions | Depreciation, amortisation and impairments | Disposals | Other changes ${ }^{1}$ | Balance at 31 Dec 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cost | ||||||
| Buildings | 261 | 81 | 37 | 5 | $-1$ | 299 |
| Land | 916 | 149 | 69 | 9 | 187 | 1,174 |
| Technical plant and machinery | 23 | 1 | 21 | - | $-1$ | 2 |
| Pumped storage power stations | 254 | 4 | 14 | - | 1 | 245 |
| Vehicle fleet | 21 | 8 | 17 | - | $-6$ | 6 |
| Ships | - | 43 | 15 | - | 6 | 34 |
| Other plant, factory and office equipment | 8 | 17 | 21 | 1 | - | 3 |
| 1,483 | 303 | 194 | 15 | 186 | 1,763 |
1 Other changes comprise transfers, write-backs, currency translation adjustments as well as additions and disposals in the scope of consolidation.
Disclosure on the corresponding lease liabilities and interest expenses can be found in Notes (8) Financial result, (23) Financial liabilities and (27) Reporting on financial instruments.
In addition, leases had the following effect on the RWE Group's income and cash flows in the year under review:
| Effects of leases on income and cash flows € million |
2023 | |
|---|---|---|
| RWE as lesse | ||
| Expenses from short-term leases | 156 | 198 |
| Expenses from leases for low-value assets | 2 | 2 |
| Expenses from variable lease payments not considered in the measurement of lease liabilities |
37 | 36 |
| Income from subleases | 16 | 6 |
| Total cash outflows from leases | 418 | 421 |
| RWE as lesse | ||
| Income from operating leases | 7 | 7 |
Leases that have been contractually agreed, but not begun yet, primarily in relation to wind and solar farms and ships for the construction of offshore wind farms, lead to future lease payments of $€ 1,232$ million (previous year: $€ 1,244$ million). Moreover, potential lease payments predominantly relating to leases of wind farm sites were disregarded when valuing lease liabilities. This relates to $€ 630$ million (previous year: $€ 706$ million) in variable payments which may come due depending on generation volumes and $€ 488$ million (previous year: $€ 332$ million) in potential payments associated with extension and termination options.
As part of project development, RWE contractually secures future use rights for potential wind and solar farms; these contract can generally be terminated in the event that the projects are not realised.
In addition to right-of-use assets, property, plant and equipment also include land and buildings leased as operating leases by RWE as lessor. As of 31 December 2024, the carrying amount of these assets totalled $€ 44$ million (previous year: $€ 170$ million).
The following payment claims resulted from these operating leases:
| Nominal lease payments from operating leases $€$ million |
31 Dec 2024 | 31 Dec 2023 |
|---|---|---|
| Due in up to 1 year | 9 | 6 |
| Due in > 1 to 2 years | 7 | 5 |
| Due in > 2 to 3 years | 7 | 4 |
| Due in > 3 to 4 years | 7 | 4 |
| Due in > 4 to 5 years | 4 | 4 |
| Due after 5 years | 13 | 13 |
(12) Investments accounted for using the equity method
Information on material and non-material investments in associates and joint ventures accounted for using the equity method is presented in the following summaries:
| Material investments accounted for using the equity method |
Amprion GmbH, Dortmund |
KELAG-Kärntner Elektrizitäts- AG / Kärntner Energieholding Beteiligungs GmbH (KEH), Klogenfurt (Austria) |
||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| € million | 31 Dec 2024 | 31 Dec 2023 | 31 Dec 2024 | 31 Dec 2023 |
| Balance sheet ${ }^{1}$ | ||||
| Non-current assets | 15,037 | 11,220 | 2,461 | 2,324 |
| Current assets | 2,548 | 2,010 | 1,120 | 911 |
| Non-current liabilities | 9,348 | 7,022 | 1,124 | 1,206 |
| Current liabilities | 2,827 | 2,176 | 801 | 871 |
| Shore of equity ${ }^{2}$ | 1,358 | $1,009^{3}$ | 565 | 470 |
| Goodwill | - | - | 198 | 198 |
| Carrying amounts | 1,326 | $973^{3}$ | 763 | 668 |
| Statement of comprehensive income ${ }^{1}$ | ||||
| Revenue | 13,740 | 16,386 | 2,219 | 3,103 |
| Income after taxes | 685 | 938 | 463 | 215 |
| Other comprehensive income | 12 | $-40$ | - | $-3$ |
| Total comprehensive income | 697 | 898 | 463 | 212 |
| Dividends (pro-rata) | 43 | 33 | 87 | 37 |
| RWE shareholding | $25 \%$ | $25 \%$ | $49 \%$ | $49 \%$ |
1 Figures based on KEH's lost available consolidated financial statements; KELAG is fully consolidated in these figures.
2 Figures based on proportional shore of equity in KEH and KELAG.
3 Prior-year figure restated due to the change in the accounting treatment of the German capacity reserve; see pages 211 et seq.
Amprion GmbH, headquartered in Dortmund, Germany, is a transmission system operator for the electricity sector, pursuant to the German Energy Act. Amprion's main shareholder is a consortium of financial investors.
KELAG-Kärntner Elektrizitäts-AG, headquartered in Klagenfurt, Austria, is a leading Austrian energy supplier in the fields of electricity, district heating and natural gas. RWE has an interest of $49 \%$ in Kärntner Energieholding Beteiligungs GmbH (KEH), KELAG's largest shareholder and also holds 12.85\% of KELAG directly (imputed RWE shareholding of $37.9 \%$ ).
In addition, RWE holds 73\% in the US joint venture Community Offshore Wind, LLC, Wilmington, USA, which is developing an offshore wind project off the coast of New York and has not yet generated any revenue. As of 31 December 2024, the carrying amount was $€ 983$ million (previous year: $€ 801$ million), which is included in the table below. Community Offshore Wind has non-current assets with a carrying amount of $€ 1,310$ million (previous year: $€ 1,093$ million), which primarily stem from seabed leases for offshore wind sites in the in the New York Bight.
| Other investments accounted for using the equity method |
Associates | Joint ventures |
|---|---|---|
| € million | 31 Dec 2024 | 31 Dec 2023 |
| Income (pro-rota) | -1 | 11 |
| Other comprehensive income | -32 | 64 |
| Total comprehensive income | -33 | 75 |
| Carrying amounts | 436 | 454 |
Joint ventures
The RWE Group holds shares with a book value of $€ 3$ million (previous year: $€ 3$ million) in associates and joint ventures, which are subject to temporary restrictions or conditions in relation to their distributions of profits, due to conditions in loan agreements.
Other non-current financial assets encompass non-consolidated subsidiaries, other investments and non-current securities. This item also includes the shares in E.ON with a carrying amount of $€ 4,437$ million (previous year: $€ 4,782$ million).
Non-current securities amounting to $€ 66$ million and $€ 3$ million (previous year: $€ 94$ million and $€ 3$ million) were deposited in trust for RWE AG and its subsidiaries, in order to cover credit balances stemming from the block model for pre-retirement part-time work, pursuant to Sec. 8a of the Pre-Retirement Part-Time Work Act and from the management of longterm working hours accounts pursuant to Sec. 7e of the German Code of Social Law IV, respectively. This coverage applies to the employees of RWE AG as well as to the employees of Group companies.
| Financial receivables | 31 Dec 2024 | 31 Dec 2023 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| € million | Non-current | Current | Non-current | Current |
| Loans to non-consolidated subsidiaries and investments | 133 | 40 | 115 | 8 |
| Collaterals for trading activities | 2 | 1,550 | 1 | 2,156 |
| Other financial receivables | ||||
| Accrued interest | - | 94 | - | 72 |
| Miscellaneous other financial receivables ${ }^{1}$ | 365 | 287 | 323 | 369 |
| 500 | 1,971 | 439 | 2,605 |
1 Prior-year figures restated due to the change in the accounting treatment of the German capacity reserve; see pages 211 et seq.
Companies of the RWE Group deposited collateral for the trading activities stated above for exchange-based and over-the-counter transactions. These are to guarantee that the obligations from the transactions are discharged even if the development of prices is not favourable for RWE. Regular replacement of the deposited collateral depends on the contractually agreed thresholds, above which collateral must be provided for the market value of the trading activities.
RWE is the lessor in finance lease arrangements pursuant to IFRS 16. The resulting lease receivables are reported in the miscellaneous other financial receivables. These essentially consist of the amounts for the 300 MW grid stability reserve plant ('special grid operating asset') in Biblis, which has been used exclusively at the request of the transmission system operator to help stabilise grid frequency and thus ensure security of supply. The provision of reserve capacity from RWE power plants within the framework of the German capacity reserve system is also included.
Finance leases had the following effect on the RWE Group's income in the year under review:
| Effects of finance leases on income and cash flows $€$ million |
2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|
| Selling profit or loss | 58 | 120 |
| Finance income on the net investment ${ }^{1}$ | 58 | 63 |
1 Prior-year figure restated due to the change in the accounting treatment of the German capacity reserve; see pages 211 et seq.
The following payment claims resulted from finance leases:
| Nominal lease payments from finance leases $€$ million |
2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|
| Due in up to 1 year ${ }^{1}$ | 121 | 84 |
| Due in > 1 to 2 years | 106 | 62 |
| Due in > 2 to 3 years | 62 | 62 |
| Due in > 3 to 4 years | 62 | 62 |
| Due in > 4 to 5 years | 62 | 62 |
| Due after 5 years | 252 | 315 |
| Discounted unguaranteed residual value | 5 | 2 |
| Unearned finance income | 265 | 257 |
| Present value of outstanding lease receivables | $\mathbf{4 0 5}$ | $\mathbf{3 9 2}$ |
1 Prior-year figure restated due to the change in the accounting treatment of the German capacity reserve; see pages 211 et seq.
(15) Derivatives and other assets
| Derivatives and other assets | 31 Dec 2024 | 31 Dec 2023 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| € million | Non-current | Current | Non-current | Current |
| Derivatives ${ }^{1}$ | 2,195 | 8,487 | 4,344 | 20,204 |
| Capitalised surplus of plan assets over benefit obligations | 613 | - | 509 | - |
| Prepayments for items other than inventories | - | 333 | - | 264 |
| $\mathrm{CO}_{2}$ emission allowances | - | 301 | - | 1,273 |
| Miscellaneous other assets | 1,373 | 1,939 | 1,717 | 1,327 |
| 4,181 | 11,060 | 6,570 | 23,068 | |
| of which: financial assets ${ }^{1}$ | 4,030 | 8,944 | 6,329 | 20,634 |
| of which: non-financial assets | 151 | 2,116 | 241 | 2,434 |
1 Prior-year figures adjusted; see page 214.
The financial instruments reported under miscellaneous other assets are measured at amortised cost. Derivative financial instruments are stated at fair value. The carrying values of exchange-traded derivatives with netting agreements are offset (see also (27) Reporting on financial instruments).
Miscellaneous other assets include compensatory payments for our early exit from the límite business awarded by the German government in the amount of $€ 1,497$ million (previous year: $€ 1,779$ million). The review by the EU Commission for compliance with state aid law reached a positive conclusion in December 2023.
Deferred tax assets and liabilities principally stem from the fact that measurements in the IFRS statements differ from those in the tax bases. As of 31 December 2024, no deferred tax liabilities were recognised for the difference between net assets and the carrying value of the subsidiaries and associates for tax purposes (known as 'outside basis differences') in the amount of $€ 1,146$ million (previous year: $€ 1,442$ million), as it is neither probable that there will be any distributions in the foreseeable future, nor will the temporary differences reduce in the foreseeable future. $€ 9,985$ million and $€ 11,546$ million of the total amount of deferred tax assets and liabilities, respectively, will be realised within twelve months (previous year: $€ 13,691$ million and $€ 15,961$ million).
The following is a breakdown of deferred tax assets and liabilities by item:
| Deferred taxes | 31 Dec 2024 | 31 Dec 2023 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| € million | Non-current | Current | Non-current | Current |
| Non-current assets | 777 | 3,729 | 842 | 2,861 |
| Current assets | 2,166 | 9,201 | 4,754 | 11,903 |
| Exceptional tax items | - | 94 | - | 100 |
| Non-current liabilities | ||||
| Provisions for pensions | 4 | 51 | 3 | 60 |
| Other non-current liabilities | 1,850 | 880 | 390 | 962 |
| Current liabilities | 7,819 | 2,345 | 8,937 | 4,058 |
| 12,616 | 16,300 | 14,926 | 19,944 | |
| Tax loss carryforwards | ||||
| Corporate income tax (or comparable foreign local income tax) ${ }^{1}$ | 844 | - | 620 | - |
| Trade tax (or comparable foreign local income tax) ${ }^{1}$ | 95 | - | 96 | - |
| Gross total ${ }^{1}$ | 13,555 | 16,300 | 15,642 | 19,944 |
| Netting ${ }^{1}$ | $-13,347$ | $-13,347$ | $-15,000$ | $-15,000$ |
| Net total ${ }^{1}$ | 208 | 2,953 | 642 | 4,944 |
1 Prior-year figures adjusted; see page 211.
As of 31 December 2024, RWE reported deferred tax claims which exceeded the deferred tax liabilities by $€ 15$ million (previous year: $€ 25$ million), in relation to companies at which losses occurred in the current or previous period. The basis for the recognition of these deferred tax assets is the judgement of the management that it is likely that the companies in question will generate taxable earnings, against which unutilised tax losses and deductible temporary differences can be applied.
The capitalised tax reduction claims from loss carryforwards result from the deferred tax liabilities of equivalent value and from the expected utilisation of previously unused tax loss carryforwards in subsequent years. It is sufficiently certain that these tax carryforwards will be realised.
At the end of the reporting period, corporate income tax loss carryforwards and trade tax loss carryforwards (or such related to comparable foreign income tax) for which no deferred tax reduction claims were recognised amounted to $€ 1,196$ million and $€ 738$ million, respectively (previous year: $€ 2,502$ million and $€ 1,798$ million). Of this, corporate tax loss carryforwards amounting to $€ 470$ million and loss carryforwards in relation to foreign local income taxes amounting to $€ 655$ million will lapse within the following 12 and 20 years, respectively.
The remaining tax loss carryforwards can essentially be utilised without any time limits.
As of 31 December 2024, temporary differences for which no deferred tax assets were recognised amounted to $€ 10,214$ million (previous year: $€ 11,202$ million).
In the year under review, deferred tax expenses of $€ 73$ million arising from the currency translation of foreign financial statements was offset against equity (previous year: $€ 3$ million).
| Inventories | 31 Dec 2024 | 31 Dec 2023 |
|---|---|---|
| € million | 709 | 706 |
| Raw materials, including nuclear fuel assemblies and earth | 227 | 224 |
| excavated for lignite mining | 1,614 | 1,333 |
| Work in progress - goods / services | 10 | 7 |
| Finished goods and goods for resale | 2,560 | 2,270 |
| Advances paid and received |
The carrying amount of inventories measured at fair value less costs to sell was $€ 1,588$ million (previous year: $€ 1,310$ million). As in the previous year, this entire amount related to gas inventories in the reporting period.
Current marketable securities include fixed-interest marketable securities totalling $€ 6,814$ million (previous year: $€ 7,691$ million) which predominantly have a maturity of more than three months from the date of acquisition. Stocks and profit-participation certificates accounted for $€ 37$ million (previous year: $€ 33$ million). Marketable securities are stated in part at fair value and in part at amortised cost.
| Cash and cash equivalents $€$ million |
31 Dec 2024 | 31 Dec 2023 |
|---|---|---|
| Bank deposits | 4,877 | 6,663 |
| Marketable securities and other cash investments (maturity less than 3 months from the date of acquisition) |
213 | 254 |
| $\mathbf{5 , 0 9 0}$ | $\mathbf{6 , 9 1 7}$ |
RWE keeps demand deposits exclusively for short-term cash positions. For cash investments, banks are selected on the basis of various creditworthiness criteria, including their rating from one of the three renowned rating agencies - Moody's, S\&P and Fitch - as well as their equity capital and prices for credit default swaps. As in the previous year, interest rates on cash and cash equivalents were at market levels in 2024.
A breakdown of fully paid-up equity is shown on pages 194 et seq. The subscribed capital of RWE AG consists exclusively of common no-par-value bearer shares (including treasury shares).
| Subcribed capital | 31 Dec 2024 Number of shares |
31 Dec 2023 Number of shares |
31 Dec 2024 Carrying amount |
31 Dec 2023 Carrying amount |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| in '000 | in '000 | € million | € million | |
| Shares | 743,841 | 743,841 | 1,904 | 1,904 |
Pursuant to a resolution passed by the Annual General Meeting on 4 May 2023, the capital stock was conditionally increased by up to $€ 190,423,349.76$, divided into up to 74,384,121 bearer shares. This conditional capital increase serves the purpose of granting shares to the holders or creditors of convertible and / or option bonds which are issued on the basis of the resolution passed by the Annual General Meeting on 4 May 2023. Based on this resolution, in the period up to 3 May 2028, convertible and / or option bonds with a total nominal value of up to $€ 5,500,000,000$ can be issued by the Company or a Group company. The Executive Board is authorised, subject to Supervisory Board approval, to determine further details of implementing conditional capital increases.
Pursuant to a resolution passed by the Annual General Meeting on 4 May 2023 and subject to Supervisory Board approval, the Executive Board is also authorised to increase the Company's capital stock by up to $€ 380,846,702.08$ until 3 May 2028 through the issuance of up to 148,768,243 bearer shares in return for contributions in cash and / or in kind (authorised capital). In certain cases, with the approval of the Supervisory Board, the subscription rights of shareholders can be excluded.
Pursuant to a resolution passed by the Annual General Meeting on 4 May 2023, the company was further authorised until 3 May 2025 to acquire shares of the company up to a volume of $10 \%$ of the capital stock when the resolution on this authorisation was passed, or if the following is lower, when this authorisation is exercised. Based on the authorisation, the Executive Board is also authorised to cancel treasury shares without a further resolution by the Annual General Meeting. Moreover, the Executive Board is authorised to transfer or sell such shares to third parties under certain conditions and excluding shareholders' subscription rights. Furthermore, treasury shares may be issued to holders of option or convertible bonds under certain conditions. The Executive Board is also authorised to use the treasury shares to discharge obligations from future employee share schemes; in this regard, shareholders' subscription rights shall be excluded.
As of 31 December 2024, 4,448,369 treasury shares (previous year: 0) were held. These shares were acquired as part of RWE AG's ongoing share buyback programme in the period from 28 November 2024 to 31 December 2024. They account for a pro-rata amount of the share capital of $€ 11,387,824.64$, which corresponds to $0.60 \%$. The average purchase price was $€ 31.11$. Additionally, another 75,000 shares were acquired on 30 December 2024, which were only received in 2025. The resulting payment obligation of $€ 2$ million was recorded as a financial liability against retained earnings. The buyback is based on the aforementioned authorisation of the Annual General Meeting of 4 May 2023. The purpose of the share buyback programme is to lower the Company's capital stock. Consequently, the acquired shares are to be cancelled.
The first tranche of the share buyback programme with a volume of up to $€ 500$ million started on 28 November 2024 and will be performed by an independent financial service provider until 28 May 2025. The entire amount of the resulting obligation as of the time of concluding the contract was offset against retained earnings as a financial liability, reduced by the share buybacks executed up until 31 December 2024. The obligation related to the remaining share buybacks after 31 December 2024 are recognised in the amount of $€ 359$ million.
In addition, 531,236 shares (previous year: 421,816 shares) were purchased by RWE AG on the capital market at a purchase price of $€ 16,510,768.66$ (previous year: $€ 16,137,338.58$ ) as part of an employee share ownership plan in fiscal 2024. The amount of the share capital attributable to them is $€ 1,359,964.16$ ( $0.07 \%$ of the subscribed capital) (previous year: $€ 1,079,848.96 ; 0.06 \%$ of the subscribed capital). As in the previous year, all of the shares were transferred to employees of RWE AG and subsidiaries participating in the employee share programme. This resulted in total proceeds of $€ 16,348,187.25$ (previous year: $€ 15,946,015.68$ ). The difference compared to the purchase price was offset against available retained earnings.
As a result of equity capital transactions with subsidiary companies which did not lead to a change of control, the share of equity attributable to RWE AG's shareholders changed by a total of $€ 86$ million (previous year: - $€ 31$ million) and the share of equity attributable to other shareholders changed by a total of $€ 391$ million (previous year: - $€ 4$ million).
Additional paid-in capital essentially includes the amounts received in the course of issuing RWE AG shares that exceed the calculated value of the shares.
Retained earnings contain the Group's income from past years, insofar as such has not been distributed. This item also includes the revaluation component of pensions and similar obligations, as well as changes in the fair value of equity instruments measured at fair value through other comprehensive income.
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (OCI) reflects changes in the fair values of debt instruments measured at fair value through other comprehensive income, cash flow hedges and hedges of the net investment in foreign operations, as well as changes stemming from foreign currency translation adjustments from foreign financial statements.
As of 31 December 2024, the share of accumulated other comprehensive income attributable to investments accounted for using the equity method amounted to -€103 million (previous year: -€79 million).
During the reporting year, $€ 237$ million in differences from currency translation which had originally been recognised without an effect on income were realised as income (previous year: $€ 19$ million).
We propose to the Annual General Meeting that RWE AG's distributable profit for fiscal 2024 be appropriated as follows:
Distribution of a dividend of $€ 1.10$ per share.
| Dividend | $€ 813,332,132.80$ |
|---|---|
| Profit carryforward | $€ 115,279,942.49$ |
| Distributable profit | $€ 928,612,075.29$ |
The dividend proposal is based on the number of dividend-bearing shares as of 31 December 2024. By the time a resolution on the appropriation of distributable profit is adopted, this number will have declined due to the share buyback programme which was commenced in November 2024. Consequently, a dividend proposal which has been adjusted accordingly and foresees an unchanged dividend of $€ 1.10$ per dividend-bearing share shall be submitted to the Annual General Meeting.
Based on a resolution of RWE AG's Annual General Meeting on 3 May 2024, the dividend for fiscal 2023 amounted to $€ 1.00$ per dividend-bearing share. The dividend payment to shareholders of RWE AG amounted to $€ 744$ million (previous year: $€ 669$ million).
The share ownership of third parties in Group entities is presented in this item.
The income and expenses recognised directly in equity ( OCl ) include the following non-controlling interests:
| Non-controllinginterests in OCI $€$ million | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|
| Currency translation adjustment | 78 | 17 |
| Fair valuation of financial instruments used for hedging purposes | 10 | $-17$ |
| Income and expenses recognised directly in equity, to be reclassified through profit or loss in the future | 88 | - |
| Actuarial gains and losses of defined benefit pension plans and similar obligations | - | 2 |
| Income and expenses recognised in equity, not to be reclassified through profit or loss | - | 2 |
| 88 | 2 |
Material non-controlling interests are attributable to the subsidiary Rampion Offshore Wind Limited, headquartered in Swindon, United Kingdom.
| Subsidiaries with material non-controlling interests | Rampion Offshore Wind Limited, United Kingdom | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| € million | 31 Dec 2024 | 31 Dec 2023 | ||
| Balance sheet | ||||
| Non-current assets | 1,630 | 1,663 | ||
| Current assets | 123 | 127 | ||
| Non-current liabilities | 229 | 233 | ||
| Statement of comprehensive income | ||||
| Revenue | 349 | 375 | ||
| Income | 105 | 114 | ||
| Total comprehensive income | 176 | 147 | ||
| Cash flows from operating activities | 226 | 243 | ||
| Non-controlling interests | ||||
| Dividends paid to non-controlling interests | 105 | 126 | ||
| Income of non-controlling interests | 52 | 57 | ||
| Share of non-controlling interests in equity | 49.90\% | 49.90\% | ||
| Share of non-controlling interests in voting rights | 49.90\% | 49.90\% |
For executives of RWE AG as well as of affiliated companies, Long Term Incentive Plans (LTIPs) are in place as share-based payment systems known as Strategic Performance Plans (SPPs). The expenses associated with these are borne by the Group companies which employ the persons holding notional stocks.
The LTIP SPP 2016-2020 was introduced in 2016. It uses an internal performance target (net income of relevance to remuneration) derived from the mid-term planning and takes into account the development of RWE AG's share price. Executives receive conditionally granted virtual shares (performance shares). The final number of virtual shares in a tranche is determined based on the achievement of the adjusted net income target. Each of the issued LTIP SPP tranches has a term of four years before payment is possible.
The plan conditions of the LTIP SPP were adjusted and extended for grants starting from fiscal 2021. In the future, along with the development of adjusted net income of relevance to remuneration, the share-based payment scheme LTIP SPP 2021 will orientate to two additional success factors: the $\mathrm{CO}_{2}$ intensity of our generation portfolio and the relative total shareholder return, which puts the total return of the RWE share in relation to that of other European utility stocks. These three success factors determine how many of the conditionally granted performance shares are finally granted at the end of the performance period. The performance period was extended from the previous one year to three years. Once it ends, all three success factors will be given equal weight in calculating the final grant. Thereafter, the performance shares must be held for a further year. Therefore, the vesting period will still be four years.
| LTIP SPP 2016-2020 | 2020 tranche |
|---|---|
| Start of term | 1 Jan 2020 |
| Number of conditionally granted performance shares | 935,331 |
| Term (vesting period) | 4 years |
| Performance target | Adjusted net income |
| Cap / number of performance shares | $150 \%$ |
| Cap / payment amount | $200 \%$ |
| Determination of payment | The payment amount is calculated on the basis of the determined number of performance shares multiplied by the sum of a) the mathematical average of the closing share price of the RWE share (ISIN DE 0007037129), with all available decimal places, in Xetra trading of Deutsche Börse AG (or a successor trading system which subsequently takes the place of the Xetra system) for the last 30 trading days prior to the end of the vesting period rounded according to standard commercial practice to two decimal places, and b) the dividends paid per share for the fiscal years between the determination of the final number of performance shares and the end of the vesting period. Dividends do not bear interest and are not reinvested. If a dividend payment occurs during the 30-day period for calculating the share price in accordance with item a), the share prices of the trading days leading up to the payment (CUM share prices) are adjusted by the dividend, as the dividend would otherwise be considered twice. Payment amount = (number of finally granted performance shares) x (mathematical average of the share price + dividends paid). The payment amount calculated in this manner is limited to no more than $200 \%$ of the grant amount. |
| Change in corporate control / merger | A change in corporate control ('change of control') shall occur if a) a shareholder gains control in accordance with Sec. 29 of the German Securities Acquisition and Takeover Act by holding at least 30\% of the voting rights including thirdparty voting rights attributable to it in accordance with Sec. 30 of the German Securities Acquisition and Takeover Act, or b) a control agreement in accordance with Sec. 291 of the German Stock Corporation Act is concluded with RWE AG as the dependent company, or c) RWE AG is merged with another legal entity that does not belong to the Group in accordance with Sec. 2 of the German Company Transformation Act, unless the value of the other legal entity is less than $50 \%$ of the value of RWE AG based on the agreed conversion rate; in such a case, item a) shall not apply. In the event of a change of control, all of the performance shares which have been fully granted and have not been paid out shall be paid out early. The payment amount is determined according to the exercise conditions, with the deviation that the last 30 trading days prior to the announcement of the change in control is to be used; plus the dividends paid per share in the fiscal years between the determination of the final number of performance shares and the time of the change in control. The payment amount calculated in this manner shall be paid to the plan participant together with his or her next salary payment. All conditionally granted performance shares as of the effective date of the change of control shall lapse without consideration. |
| Form of settlement | Cash settlement |
| Payment date | 2024 |
| LTIP SPP 2021 | Tronche 2021 | 2022 tronche | 2023 tronche | 2024 tronche |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Start of term | 1 Jan 2021 | 1 Jan 2022 | 1 Jan 2023 | 1 Jan 2024 |
| Number of conditionally granted performance shares | 823,566 | 855,532 | 743,079 | 822,920 |
| Term (vesting period) | 4 years | 4 years | 4 years | 4 years |
| Performance targets | 1. Adjusted net income; 2. $\mathrm{CO}_{2}$ intensity; 3. Relative total shareholder return |
1. Adjusted net income; 2. $\mathrm{CO}_{2}$ intensity; 3. Relative total shareholder return |
1. Adjusted net income; 2. $\mathrm{CO}_{2}$ intensity; 3. Relative total shareholder return |
1. Adjusted net income; 2. $\mathrm{CO}_{2}$ intensity; 3. Relative total shareholder return |
| Weighting of performance targets | Average achievement of performance targets, each weighted $1 / 3$ | Average achievement of performance targets, each weighted $1 / 3$ | Average achievement of performance targets, each weighted $1 / 3$ | Average achievement of performance targets, each weighted $1 / 3$ |
| Performance period | 3 years | 3 years | 3 years | 3 years |
| Cop / number of performance shares | $150 \%$ | $150 \%$ | $150 \%$ | $150 \%$ |
| Cop / payment amount | $200 \%$ | $200 \%$ | $200 \%$ | $200 \%$ |
| Determination of payment | The payment amount is calculated on the basis of the determined number of performance shares multiplied by the sum of a) the mathematical average of the closing share price of the RWE shore (ISIN DE 0007037129), with oil available decimal places, in Xetro trading of Deutsche Börse AG (or a successor trading system which subsequently takes the place of the Xetra system) for the last 30 trading days prior to the end of the vesting period rounded according to standard commercial practice to two decimal places, and b) the dividends paid per share for the fiscal years during the vesting periods. Dividends do not bear interest and ore not reinvested. If a dividend payment occurs during the 30 -day period for calculating the share price in accordance with item a), the share prices of the trading days leading up to the payment (CUM share prices) are adjusted by the dividend, as the dividend would otherwise be considered twice. Payment amount = (number of finally granted performance shares) x (mathematical average of the shore price + dividends paid). The payment amount calculated in this manner is limited to no more than $200 \%$ of the grant amount. |
|||
| Change in corporate control/ merger | A change in corporate control ('change of control') shall occur if a) a shareholder gains control in accordance with Sec. 29 of the German Securities Acquisition and Takeover Act by holding at least 30\% of the voting rights including thirdparty voting rights attributable to it in accordance with Sec. 30 of the German Securities Acquisition and Takeover Act, or b) a control agreement in accordance with Sec. 291 of the German Stock Corporation Act is concluded with RWE AG as the dependent company, or c) RWE AG is merged with another legal entity that does not belong to the Group in accordance with Sec. 2 of the German Company Transformation Act, unless the value of the other legal entity is less than $50 \%$ of the value of RWE AG based on the agreed conversion rate; in such a case, item a) shall not apply. In the event of a change of control, oil of the performance shares which have been fully granted and have not been paid out shall be paid out without change on expiry of the holding period. The payment amount is determined according to the exercise conditions, with the deviation that the takeover price per share is to be used, plus the dividends paid per share in the fiscal years between the start of the vesting period and the time of the change in control. The value of oil performance shares granted conditionally at the time of the change of control shall be determined with appropriate application of the exercise conditions based on the full-year results for the targets that are available up to the fiscal year in which the change of control occurs, even if in this case the performance period only lasts one or two years. The payment amount is determined according to the exercise conditions, with the deviation that the takeover price per share is to be used, plus the dividends paid per shore in the fiscal years between the start of the vesting period and the time of the change in control. All granted performance shares for the calendar year of the change of control shall lapse without consideration. |
|||
| Form of settlement | Cash settlement | Cash settlement | Cash settlement | Cash settlement |
| Payment date | 2025 | 2026 | 2027 | 2028 |
The fair value of the performance shares conditionally granted under SPP included the following sums on the grant date:
| Performance Shares from the RWE AG SPP € |
2020 tranche |
2021 tranche |
2022 tranche |
2023 tranche |
2024 tranche |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fair value per share | 26.41 | 34.07 | 34.51 | 41.83 | 39.89 |
The fair values of the tranches of the RWE AG SPP 2016-2020 are based on RWE AG's current share price plus the dividends per share which have already been paid to the shareholders during the term of the corresponding tranche. The limited payment per SPP was implemented via a sold call option. The option value calculated using the Black Scholes Model was deducted. The maximum payments per conditionally granted SPP ( $\times$ option strike) established in the plan conditions, the discount rates relative to the remaining term as well as the volatilities and expected dividends of RWE AG were considered in determining the option price.
Multivariate Monte Carlo simulations were used for the valuation of RWE AG's SPP 2021 tranches. In this context, the success factors not dependent on the capital market were taken as the best estimators without variability. In the valuation model, due consideration was given to the maximum payment amounts stipulated in the programme's conditions for each conditionally granted SPP ( $\times$ option strike), the success factors not dependent on the capital market, the current level of the RWE AG share and the index, the volatilities and correlations, the discount rates for the remaining term and the expected dividends of RWE AG.
The performance shares displayed the following development in the fiscal year that just came to a close:
| Performance Shares from the RWE AG SPP Share |
2020 tranche |
2021 tranche |
2022 tranche |
2023 tranche |
2024 tranche |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Outstanding at the start of the fiscal year |
966,848 | 803,686 | 845,298 | 743,079 | - |
| Granted | - | - | - | - | 822,920 |
| Change ${ }^{1}$ | - | 108,596 | -25,347 | 2,647 | - |
| Paid out | 966,848 | - | - | - | - |
| Outstanding at the end of the fiscal year |
- | 912,282 | 819,951 | 745,726 | 822,920 |
| Payable at the end of the fiscal year |
- | 912,282 | - | - | - |
1 'Change' pertains to the final grant based on target achievement or the subsequent grant or lapse of performance shares.
For the SPP options exercised in the period under review, the average weighted daily share price on the day of exercise was $€ 30.37$. For the 2021 tranche, $€ 31$ million is payable.
During the period under review, expenses for the share-based payment system totalled €2 million (previous year: €46 million). As of the balance-sheet date, provisions for cash-settled share-based payment programmes amounted to €65 million (previous year: $€ 102$ million).
(22) Provisions
| Provisions | 31 Dec 2024 | 31 Dec 2023 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| € million | Non-current | Current | Total | Non-current | Current | Total |
| Provisions for pensions and similar obligations | 1,328 | - | 1,328 | 1,324 | - | 1,324 |
| Provisions for nuclear waste management | 4,403 | 578 | 4,981 | 4,814 | 570 | 5,384 |
| Provisions for mining damage | 6,028 | 251 | 6,279 | 6,741 | 208 | 6,949 |
| 11,759 | 829 | 12,588 | 12,879 | 778 | 13,657 | |
| Other provisions | ||||||
| Staff-related obligations (excluding restructuring) | 212 | 778 | 990 | 249 | 1,090 | 1,339 |
| Restructuring obligations | 728 | 22 | 750 | 718 | 16 | 734 |
| Purchase and sales obligations | 783 | 353 | 1,136 | 1,533 | 374 | 1,907 |
| Provisions for dismantling wind and solar forms | 1,343 | 23 | 1,366 | 1,197 | 16 | 1,213 |
| Other dismantling and retrofitting obligations | 505 | 98 | 603 | 457 | 86 | 543 |
| Environmental protection obligations | 34 | - | 34 | 33 | 1 | 34 |
| Interest payment obligations | 42 | - | 42 | 81 | - | 81 |
| Obligations to deliver $\mathrm{CO}_{2}$ emission allowances / certificates for renewable energies | - | 3,608 | 3,608 | - | 3,959 | 3,959 |
| Miscellaneous other provisions | 284 | 336 | 620 | 284 | 495 | 779 |
| 3,931 | 5,218 | 9,149 | 4,552 | 6,037 | 10,589 | |
| 15,690 | 6,047 | 21,737 | 17,431 | 6,815 | 24,246 |
Provisions for pensions and similar obligations. The company pension plan consists of defined contribution and defined benefit plans. The defined benefit commitments mainly relate to pension benefits based on final salary. These are exposed to the typical risks of longevity, inflation and salary increases.
In the reporting period, $€ 55$ million (previous year: $€ 49$ million) was paid into defined contribution plans. This includes payments made by RWE for a benefit plan in the Netherlands which covers the commitments of various employers. This fund does not provide the participating companies with information allowing for the pro-rata allocation of defined benefit obligations, plan assets and service cost. In the consolidated financial statements, the contributions are thus recognised analogously to a defined contribution plan, although this is a defined benefit plan. The pension plan for employees in the
Netherlands is administered by Stichting Pensioenfonds ABP (see www.abp.nl). Contributions to the pension plan are calculated as a percentage rate of employees' salaries and are paid by the employees and employers. The rate of the contributions is determined by ABP. There are no minimum funding obligations. Approximately $€ 14$ million in employer contributions are expected to be paid to the ABP pension fund in fiscal 2025 (prior-year figure for fiscal 2024: €13 million). The contributions are used for all of the beneficiaries. If ABP's funds are insufficient, it can either curtail pension benefits and future postemployment benefits, or increase the contributions of the employer and employees. In the event that RWE terminates the ABP pension plan, ABP will charge a termination fee. Amongst other things, its level depends on the number of participants in the plan, the amount of salary and the age structure of the participants. As of 31 December 2024, we had around 750 active participants in the plan (previous year: approximately 690).
RWE transferred assets to RWE Pensionstreuhand e.V. within the framework of a contractual trust arrangement (CTA) in order to finance the pension commitments of German Group companies. There is no obligation to provide further funds. From the assets held in trust, funds were transferred to RWE Pensionsfonds AG to cover pension commitments to most of the employees who have already retired. RWE Pensionsfonds AG falls under the scope of the Act on the Supervision of Insurance Undertakings and oversight by the Federal Financial Supervisory Agency (BaFin). Insofar as a regulatory deficit occurs in the pension fund, supplementary payment shall be requested from the employer. Independently of the aforementioned rules, the liability of the employer shall remain in place. The boards of RWE Pensionstreuhand e. V. and RWE Pensionsfonds AG are responsible for ensuring that the funds under management are used in compliance with the contract and thus fulfil the requirements for recognition as plan assets.
In the United Kingdom, it is legally mandated that defined benefit plans be provided with adequate and suitable assets to cover pension obligations. The corporate pension system is managed by the sector-wide Electricity Supply Pension Scheme (ESPS). There are two dedicated, independent sections: the RWE Section and the Innogy Section. The sections
are managed by trustees which are elected by members of the pension plans or appointed by the sponsoring employers. The trustees are responsible for managing the pension plans. This includes investments, pension payments and financing plans. The pension plans comprise the benefit obligations and plan assets for the subsidiaries of the RWE Group. It is required by law to assess the required financing of the pension plans once every three years in compliance yg valuation). This involves measuring pension obligations on the basis of conservative assumptions, whicyh deviate from the requirements imposed by IFRS. The underlying actuarial assumptions primarily include the projected life expectancies of the members of the pension plans as well as assumptions relating to inflation, imputed interest rates and the market returns on the plan assets.
The last funding valuation for the RWE Section on 31 March 2022 did not find a financing deficit. The next funding valuation must occur by 31 March 2025. For the Innogy Section, the last funding valuation occurred as at 31 March 2024; as of the balance-sheet date, this valuation had not yet been completed. We do not believe that the valuation will find a financing deficit.
The payments to settle a financing deficit that is identified are charged to the participating companies on the basis of a contractual agreement. Above and beyond this, payments are regularly made to finance the newly arising benefit obligations of active employees which increase the pension claims.
Provisions for defined benefit plans are determined using actuarial methods. We apply the following assumptions:
| Calculation assumptions | 31 Dec 2024 | 31 Dec 2023 | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| in\% | Germany | Foreign ${ }^{1}$ | Germany | Foreign ${ }^{1}$ | ||||
| Discount rate | 3.60 | 5.40 | 3.50 | 4.60 | ||||
| Wage and salary growth rate | 2.75 | 3.20 | 2.75 | 3.10 | ||||
| Pension increase rate | 1.00, 2.00 | 1.00, 2.00 | ||||||
| and 2.15 | 2.00 and 3.00 | and 2.15 | 2.00 and 2.90 |
1 Persons to benefit commitments to employees of the RWE Group in the UK.
| Composition of plan assets (fair value) | 31 Dec 2024 | 31 Dec 2023 | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Germany ${ }^{2}$ | Of which: Level 1 pursuant to IFRS 13 |
Foreign ${ }^{3}$ | Of which: Level 1 pursuant to IFRS 13 |
Germany ${ }^{1}$ | Of which: Level 1 pursuant to IFRS 13 |
Foreign ${ }^{2}$ | Of which: Level 1 pursuant to IFRS 13 |
|
| Equity instruments, exchange-traded funds | 1,050 | 1,029 | 376 | - | 1,188 | 1,172 | 411 | - |
| Interest-bearing instruments | 5,026 | - | 2,909 | 175 | 5,017 | 5 | 3,145 | 328 |
| Mixed funds ${ }^{3}$ | 47 | - | - | - | 46 | - | - | - |
| Alternative investments | 74 | 69 | 1,131 | 20 | 91 | 71 | 1,088 | 121 |
| Other ${ }^{4}$ | 200 | 72 | 207 | 8 | 58 | 58 | 140 | 44 |
| 6,397 | 1,170 | 4,623 | 203 | 6,400 | 1,306 | 4,784 | 493 |
[^0]
[^0]: 1 Plan assets in Germany primarily pertain to assets of RWE AG and other Group companies which are managed by RWE Pensionstreuhand e.V. as a trust, as well as to assets of RWE Pensionsfonds AG.
2 Foreign plan assets pertain to the assets of the RWE Group within the British ESPS to cover benefit commitments to employees of the RWE Group in the UK.
3 Includes equity and interest-bearing instruments.
4 Includes reinsurance claims against insurance companies and other fund assets.
Our investment policy in Germany is based on a detailed analysis of the plan assets and the pension commitments and the relation of these two items to each other in order to determine the best possible investment strategy (Asset Liability Management Study). Using an optimisation process, portfolios are identified which can earn the best targeted results at a defined level of risk. One of these efficient portfolios is selected and the strategic asset allocation is determined; furthermore, the related risks are analysed in detail.
The focus of RWE's strategic investment policy is on bonds. In addition to domestic and foreign government and corporate bonds, high-yield bonds are also used to increase the average yield. Furthermore, there is also a small amount of investment in equities from various regions. The investment position in equities is intended to earn a risk premium over bond investments over the long term. Furthermore, in order to achieve consistently high returns, there is also investment in products which are more likely to offer relatively regular positive returns over time. This involves products with returns which fluctuate like those of bond investments, but which achieve an additional return over the medium term, such as so-called absolute return products.
In the United Kingdom, our capital investment takes account of the structure of the pension obligations as well as liquidity and risk matters. The goal of the investment strategy in this context is to maintain the level of pension plan funding and ensure the full financing of the pension plans over time. To reduce financing costs and earn surplus returns, we also include higher-risk investments in our portfolio. The capital investment focusses on government and corporate bonds.
Pension provisions for pension commitments changed as follows:
| Changes in pension provisions | Present value of pension commit- ments |
Fair value of plan assets |
Capitalised surplus of plan assets |
Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| € million | 11,999 | 11,184 | 509 | 1,324 |
| Bolance at 1 Jan 2024 | 91 | - | - | 91 |
| Current service cost | 458 | 436 | - | 22 |
| Interest cost/income | - | -219 | - | 219 |
| Return on fund assets less interest components |
-8 | - | - | -8 |
| Gain / loss on change in demographic assumptions |
-490 | - | - | -490 |
| Gain / loss on change in financial assumptions |
220 | - | - | 220 |
| Experience-based gains/losses | 200 | 223 | 24 | 1 |
| Currency translation adjustments | 9 | 9 | - | - |
| Employer contributions ${ }^{1}$ | - | 94 | - | -94 |
| Benefits paid ${ }^{2}$ | -748 | -701 | - | -47 |
| Changes in the scope of consolidation/ transfers |
4 | - | - | 4 |
| General administration expenses | - | -6 | - | 6 |
| Change in capitalised surplus of plan assets |
- | - | 80 | 80 |
| Balance at 31 Dec 2024 | 11,735 | 11,020 | 613 | 1,328 |
| of which: domestic | 7,658 | 6,397 | 50 | 1,311 |
| of which: foreign | 4,077 | 4,623 | 563 | 17 |
1 Of which: €94 million in cash flows from operating activities.
2 Contained in cash flows from operating activities.
| Changes in pension provisions | Present value of pension commitments | Fair value of plan assets | Capitalised surplus of plan assets | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| € million | ||||
| Balance at 1 Jan 2023 | 11,239 | 11,019 | 680 | 900 |
| Current service cost | 75 | - | - | 75 |
| Interest cost/income | 490 | 487 | - | 3 |
| Return on fund assets less interest components | - | 182 | - | $-182$ |
| Gain/loss on change in demographic assumptions | $-63$ | - | - | $-63$ |
| Gain/loss on change in financial assumptions | 727 | - | - | 727 |
| Experience-based gains/losses | 161 | - | - | 161 |
| Currency translation adjustments | 87 | 98 | 11 | - |
| Employee contributions | 9 | 9 | - | - |
| Employer contributions ${ }^{1}$ | - | 73 | - | $-73$ |
| Benefits paid ${ }^{2}$ | $-744$ | $-695$ | - | $-49$ |
| Changes in the scope of consolidation/ transfers | 17 | 15 | - | 2 |
| Past service cost | 1 | - | - | 1 |
| General administration expenses | - | $-4$ | - | 4 |
| Change in capitalised surplus of plan assets | - | - | $-182$ | $-182$ |
| Balance at 31 Dec 2023 | 11,999 | 11,184 | 509 | 1,324 |
| of which: domestic | 7,664 | 6,400 | 45 | 1,309 |
| of which: foreign | 4,335 | 4,784 | 464 | 15 |
1 Of which: $€ 73$ million in cash flows from operating activities.
2 Contained in cash flows from operating activities.
Changes in the actuarial assumptions would lead to the following changes in the present value of the defined benefit obligations:
| Sensitivity analysis of pension provisions | Changes in the present value of defined benefit obligations | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| € million | 31 Dec 2024 | 31 Dec 2023 | ||
| Change in the discount rate by $+50 /-50$ basis points | ||||
| Domestic | $-433$ | 482 | $-444$ | 494 |
| Foreign | $-199$ | 218 | $-229$ | 253 |
| Change in the wage and salary growth rate by $-50 /+50$ basis points | ||||
| Domestic | $-17$ | 17 | $-20$ | 20 |
| Foreign | $-13$ | 16 | $-15$ | 16 |
| Change in the pension increase rate by $-50 /+50$ basis points | ||||
| Domestic | $-302$ | 327 | $-313$ | 340 |
| Foreign | $-135$ | 106 | $-138$ | 139 |
| Increase of one year in life expectancy | ||||
| Domestic | - | 315 | - | 321 |
| Foreign | - | 112 | - | 104 |
The sensitivity analyses are based on the change of one assumption each, with all other assumptions remaining unchanged. Actual developments will probably be different than this. The methods of calculating the aforementioned sensitivities and for calculating the pension provisions are in agreement. The dependence of pension provisions on market interest rates is limited by an opposite effect. The background of this is that the commitments stemming from company pension plans are primarily covered by funds, and mostly plan assets exhibit negative correlation with the market yields of fixed-interest securities.
Consequently, declines in market interest rates are typically reflected in an increase in plan assets, whereas rising market interest rates are typically reflected in a reduction in plan assets.
The present value of pension obligations, less the fair value of the plan assets, equals the net amount of funded and unfunded pension obligations.
As of the balance-sheet date, the recognised amount of pension provisions totalled $€ 786$ million for funded pension plans (previous year: $€ 880$ million) and $€ 542$ million for unfunded pension plans (previous year: $€ 444$ million).
Domestic company pensions are subject to an obligation to review for adjustment every three years pursuant to the Act on the Improvement of Company Pensions (Sec. 16 of the German Company Pension Act (BetrAVG)). Additionally, some commitments grant annual adjustments of pensions, which may exceed the adjustments in compliance with the legally mandated adjustment obligation. Due to the currently high level of inflation, future pension
adjustments in Germany are projected to be higher than the long-term trend assumed in the calculations. The surplus inflation that is expected and accumulates until the next mandatory date for the legal adjustment will thus be captured as a lump-sum premium, which will be derived from the consideration of past adjustments and the regular adjustment practices and will be applied to the claims in question.
Some domestic pension plans guarantee a certain pension level, taking into account the statutory pension (total retirement earnings schemes). As a result, future reductions in the statutory pension can result in higher pension payments by RWE.
The weighted average duration of the pension obligations was 12 years in Germany (previous year: 13 years) and 11 years outside of Germany (previous year: 11 years).
In fiscal 2025, RWE expects to make $€ 135$ million in payments for defined benefit plans (previous-year target: $€ 140$ million), as direct benefits and contributions to plan assets.
| Provisions for nuclear energy and mining $€$ million |
Balance at 1 Jan 2024 |
Additions | Unused amounts released |
Interest accretion | Amounts used | Balance at 31 Dec 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Provisions for nuclear waste management | 5,384 | 94 | - | 52 | -549 | 4,981 |
| Provisions for mining damage | 6,949 | 5 | -580 | 91 | -186 | 6,279 |
| $\mathbf{1 2 , 3 3 3}$ | $\mathbf{9 9}$ | $\mathbf{- 5 8 0}$ | $\mathbf{1 4 3}$ | $\mathbf{- 7 3 5}$ | $\mathbf{1 1 , 2 6 0}$ |
Provisions for nuclear waste management are recognised for the nuclear power plants Biblis $A$ and $B$, Emsland and Gundremmingen $A, B$ and $C$, as well as Lingen and MülheimKärlich; for the Dutch nuclear power plant Borssele, such provisions are included at a rate of $30 \%$ in line with RWE's stake.
Provisions for nuclear waste disposal are almost exclusively reported as non-current provisions, and their settlement amount is discounted to the balance-sheet date. Based on the current state of planning, these provisions will essentially be used by the beginning of the 2040s. As of the balance-sheet date, the average discount rate calculated on the basis of the market interest rate level for no-risk cash investments was $2.3 \%$ (previous year: $2.0 \%$ ), and the average escalation rate based on market inflation expectations was $1.9 \%$ (previous year: $2.0 \%$ ). As a result, the real average discount rate used for nuclear waste management purposes, which is the difference between the average discount rate and the average escalation rate, amounted to $0.4 \%$ (previous year: $0.0 \%$ ). An increase (decrease) in this rate by 0.1 percentage point would reduce (increase) the present value of the provision by roughly $€ 25$ million.
The additions to provisions for nuclear waste management in the amount of $€ 94$ million are mainly based on updates of the cost estimates. In the reporting period, we also used provisions of $€ 500$ million for the decommissioning of nuclear power plants. Decommissioning and dismantling costs had originally been capitalised in a corresponding amount and reported under the cost of the respective nuclear power plants. Interest accretion increased the provisions for nuclear waste management by $€ 52$ million, of which $€ 12$ million was offset against the corresponding acquisition costs for the Borssele nuclear power plant.
The provisions of the law on the reassignment of responsibility for nuclear waste disposal stipulate that accountability for the shutdown and dismantling of the assets in Germany as well as for packaging radioactive waste remains with the companies. The shutdown and dismantling process encompasses all activities following the final termination of production by the nuclear power plant until the plant site is removed from the regulatory
scope of the Nuclear Energy Act. A request to decommission and dismantle the nuclear power plant was filed with the nuclear licensing authority during its operating period so that the decommissioning and dismantling work can be performed in time after the expiry of the operating permit. Dismantling operations essentially consist of dismantling and removal of the radioactive contamination from the facilities and structures, radiation protection and regulatory monitoring of the dismantling measures and residual operations.
We thus subdivide our provisions for nuclear waste management into the residual operation of nuclear power plants, the dismantling of nuclear power station facilities as well as the cost of residual material processing and radioactive waste treatment facilities.
| Provisions for nuclear waste management $€$ million |
31 Dec 2024 | 31 Dec 2023 |
|---|---|---|
| Residual operation | 1,541 | 1,798 |
| Dismantling | 1,862 | 1,855 |
| Processing of residual material and waste management | 1,578 | 1,731 |
| $\mathbf{4 , 9 8 1}$ | $\mathbf{5 , 3 8 4}$ |
Provisions for the residual operation of nuclear power facilities also include the costs for the post-operational phase, i.e. the period following the termination of production until receipt of the permit for decommissioning and dismantling. Residual operation covers all steps which must be taken largely independent of dismantling and disposal but are necessary to ensure that the assets are safe and in compliance with permits or which are required by the authorities. In addition to works monitoring and facility protection, these mainly include service, recurrent audits, maintenance, radiation and fire protection as well as infrastructural adjustments.
Provisions for the dismantling of nuclear power plant facilities include all work done to dismantle plants, parts of plants, systems and components as well as on buildings that
must be dismantled to comply with the Nuclear Energy Act. They also consider the conventional dismantling of nuclear power plant facilities to fulfil legal or other obligations.
Provisions for residual material processing and waste management include the costs of processing radioactive residual material for non-hazardous recycling and the costs of treating radioactive waste produced during the plant's service life and dismantling operations. This includes the various processes for conditioning, proper packaging of the low-level and intermediate-level radioactive waste in suitable containers, and the transportation of such waste to BGZ Gesellschaft für Zwischenlagerung mbH (BGZ), which has been commissioned by the Federal government for intermediate storage. This item also contains the cost of transporting the waste produced by recycling and of the proper packaging of spent nuclear fuel elements, i.e. the cost of procuring and loading freight and interim storage containers.
Commissioned by the plant operator, the international company Siempelkamp NIS Ingenieurgesellschaft mbH , Alzenau, annually assesses the prospective costs of residual operation, the dismantling of the nuclear power plants and the cost of conditioning and packaging low-level and intermediate-level radioactive waste and the transportation of such to BGZ's interim storage facilities. The costs are determined specifically for each facility and take into consideration the current state of the art, regulatory requirements and previous practical experience from ongoing and completed dismantling projects. Further cost estimates for the disposal of radioactive waste are based on contracts with foreign reprocessing companies and other disposal companies. Furthermore, the cost estimates are based on plans by internal and external experts.
In terms of their contractual definition, provisions for nuclear waste management break down as follows:
| Provisions for nuclear waste management $€$ million |
31 Dec 2024 | 31 Dec 2023 |
|---|---|---|
| Provisions for nuclear obligations, not yet contractually defined | 3,410 | 3,634 |
| Provisions for nuclear obligations, contractually defined | 1,571 | 1,750 |
| $\mathbf{4 , 9 8 1}$ | $\mathbf{5 , 3 8 4}$ |
The provision for obligations which are not yet contractually defined covers the costs of the remaining operational phase, the costs of dismantling as well as the residual material processing and waste treatment costs subject to future contractual agreement.
Provisions for contractually defined nuclear obligations relate to all obligations the value of which is specified in contracts under civil law. The obligations include the anticipated residual costs of reprocessing and returning the resulting radioactive waste. These costs stem from existing contracts with foreign reprocessing companies and with the company Gesellschaft für Nuklear-Service mbH (GNS). Moreover, these provisions also include the costs for transport and intermediate storage containers for and the loading of spent fuel assemblies. Furthermore, this item also includes the volumes of the orders for the professional packaging of low-level and medium-level waste as well as the in-house personnel costs incurred for the decommissioning of plants.
Provisions for mining damage consist almost entirely of non-current provisions. They are reported at their settlement amount discounted to the balance-sheet date. The cost estimates are based on contracts as well as information from internal and external expert specialists.
In discounting the amounts used in the coming 30 years, we have oriented ourselves towards the market interest rates for no-risk cash investments as of the balance-sheet date. Since no market interest rates are available for later periods, a sustainable, longterm interest rate is used to discount the amounts used after the next 30 years. The average discount rate was 3.0\% (previous year: 3.0\%). The majority of the provisions pertains to claims that are expected to materialise over the next 30 years. The average escalation rate based on market inflation expectations as of the balance-sheet date was $1.9 \%$ (previous year: $2.0 \%$ ). As a result, the real average discount rate applied for mining purposes, which is the difference between the average discount rate and the average escalation rate, amounted to $1.1 \%$ (previous year: $1.0 \%$ ).
A decline of 0.1 percentage point in the real discount rate would increase the present value of the provision by around $€ 100$ million, while an increase of 0.1 percentage point would reduce the present value by around $€ 90$ million.
In light of additional details in relation to permits for decommissioning lignite mining operations as part of the coal phaseout, planning and operational frameworks have been elaborated, along with the related expenditures for site resoration. In the reporting period, provisions for mining damage in the amount of $€ 580$ million were released. This was mainly based on updates of cost estimates and lower long-term electricity prices. Of the additions of $€ 5$ million, $€ 1$ million was capitalised in the line item 'property, plant and equipment'. Interest accretion increased provisions for mining damage by $€ 91$ million.
| Other provisions | Balance of 1 Jan 2024 | Additions | Unused amounts released | Interest accretion | Changes in the scope of consolidation, currency adjustments, transfers | Amounts used | Balance at 31 Dec 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| € million | |||||||
| Stoff-related obligations (excluding restructuring) | 1,339 | 524 | $-18$ | 11 | 30 | $-896$ | 990 |
| Restructuring obligations | 734 | 76 | $-29$ | 14 | $-38$ | $-7$ | 750 |
| Purchase and sales obligations | 1,907 | 422 | $-814$ | 25 | 1 | $-405$ | 1,136 |
| Provisions for dismantling wind and solar forms | 1,213 | 203 | $-25$ | $-71$ | 48 | $-2$ | 1,366 |
| Other dismantling and retrofitting obligations | 543 | 74 | $-11$ | 24 | 4 | $-31$ | 603 |
| Environmental protection obligations | 34 | - | - | 1 | $-1$ | - | 34 |
| Interest payment obligations | 81 | - | $-39$ | - | - | - | 42 |
| Obligations to deliver $\mathrm{CO}_{2}$ emission allowances/ certificates for renewable energies | 3,959 | 3,607 | $-213$ | - | 33 | $-3,778$ | 3,608 |
| Miscellaneous other provisions | 779 | 219 | $-71$ | $-9$ | $-107$ | $-191$ | 620 |
| 10,589 | 5,125 | $-1,220$ | $-5$ | $-30$ | $-5,310$ | 9,149 |
Provisions for staff-related obligations mainly consist of provisions for pre-retirement part-time work arrangements, severance, outstanding vacation and service jubilees, and performance-based pay components. Based on current estimates, we expect most of these to be used by 2025.
Provisions for restructuring obligations pertain mainly to measures for socially acceptable payroll downsizing. We currently expect the majority of these to be used from 2025 to 2034. In so doing, sums ear-marked for personnel measures are reclassified from provisions for restructuring obligations to provisions for staff-related obligations as soon as the underlying restructuring measure has been specified. This is the case if individual contracts governing socially acceptable payroll downsizing are signed by affected employees.
Provisions for purchase and sales obligations primarily relate to onerous contracts.
From the current perspective, we expect that the majority of the provisions for the dismantling of wind and solar farms will be used from 2025 to 2059, and the provisions for other dismantling and retrofitting obligations will be used from 2025 to 2060 .
(23) Financial liabilities
| Financial liabilities | 31 Dec 2024 | 31 Dec 2023 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| $€$ million | Non-current | Current | Non-current | Current |
| Bonds ${ }^{1}$ and other notes payable | 7,591 | 1,537 | 6,691 | 13 |
| Commercial paper | - | 50 | - | 209 |
| Bank debt | 3,725 | 656 | 4,077 | 759 |
| Other financial liabilities | ||||
| Collateral for trading activities | - | 699 | - | 1,418 |
| Lease liabilities | 2,092 | 139 | 1,824 | 89 |
| Miscellaneous other financial liabilities | 1,364 | 817 | 1,472 | 476 |
| 14,772 | 3,898 | 14,064 | 2,964 |
1 Including hybrid bonds classified as debt as per IFRS.
The following overview shows the key data on the bonds of the RWE Group as of 31 December 2024 and 31 December 2023:
| Bonds payable Issuer | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
In accordance with IFRS, the hybrid bonds are classified as debt, as they have a fixed, finite maturity and there is no option to suspend interest payments for a longer period of time.
In January 2024, RWE issued another green bond with a volume of $€ 500$ million. The bond matures in 2032 and has a yield-to-maturity of $3.7 \%$, based on a coupon of $3.625 \%$ p.a. and an issue price of $99.489 \%$. In accordance with RWE's guidelines for green bonds, the RWE Green Bond Framework, the proceeds from the issue may only be used for the financing or refinancing of wind and solar projects, as well as energy storage, and hydrogen production and storage facilities.
In April 2024, RWE issued its first green USD bond with a total volume of US $\$ 2$ billion. The bond consisted of two tranches, one with a volume of US $\$ 1$ billion and a maturity of ten years and one with a volume of US $\$ 1$ billion and a maturity of thirty years. Based on a coupon of $5.875 \%$ and an issue price of $99.619 \%$, the yield-to-maturity amounted to $5.926 \%$ for the first tranche. The yield-to-maturity was $6.261 \%$ for the second tranche, with a coupon of $6.250 \%$ and an issue price of $99.852 \%$.
In April 2024, RWE AG's Debt Issuance Programme (DIP) was increased from $€ 10$ billion to $€ 15$ billion. The green bond issued in the USA and the two outstanding hybrid bonds are not part of the DIP.
In February 2023, RWE issued two green bonds, each with a volume of $€ 500$ million (total volume: $€ 1$ billion). For the first bond with maturity in 2029, the yield-to-maturity amounted to $3.680 \%$, based on a coupon of $3.625 \%$ p.a. and an issue price of $99.709 \%$. For the second bond with maturity in 2035, the yield-to-maturity was $4.148 \%$, based on a coupon of $4.125 \%$ p.a. and an issue price of $99.786 \%$.
Income tax liabilities contain uncertain income tax items in the amount of $€ 682$ million (previous year: $€ 552$ million). This item primarily includes income taxes for periods for which the tax authorities have not yet finalised a tax assessment, including the current year.
(25) Derivatives and other liabilities
| Derivatives and other liabilities | 31 Dec 2024 | 31 Dec 2023 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| € million | Non-current | Current | Non-current | Current |
| Derivatives ${ }^{1}$ | 1,455 | 8,794 | 1,609 | 16,239 |
| Tax liabilities | - | 129 | - | 107 |
| Social security liabilities | - | 33 | 1 | 35 |
| Liabilities from restructuring | - | 1 | - | - |
| Miscellaneous other liabilities | 1,801 | 2,814 | 1,319 | 1,375 |
| 3,256 | 11,771 | 2,929 | 17,756 | |
| of which: financial debt ${ }^{1}$ | 1,559 | 9,661 | 1,688 | 17,185 |
| of which: non-financial debt | 1,697 | 2,110 | 1,241 | 571 |
The principal component of social security liabilities are the amounts payable to social security institutions.
Miscellaneous other liabilities contain $€ 1,397$ million in contract liabilities (previous year: $€ 129$ million). The increase in contract liabilities stems from portfolio optimisation activities.
Moreover, $€ 191$ million (previous year: $€ 62$ million) in miscellaneous other liabilities were allocable to investment-related government grants primarily granted in connection with the construction of electrolysers and wind farms.
Basic and diluted earnings per share are calculated by dividing the portion of net income attributable to RWE shareholders by the average number of shares outstanding; treasury shares are not taken into account in this calculation. The RWE shares acquired within the framework of the share buyback programme are included in the number of outstanding shares on a pro-rata basis until their legal transfer to RWE. The number of shares resulting from the conversion on 15 March 2023 of the mandatory convertible bond issued on 10 October 2022 are taken into account in the determination of basic and diluted earnings per share starting from the time at which the mandatory convertible bond was issued, using the weighted average number of shares in circulation.
| Earnings per share | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Net income for RWE AG shareholders | € million | 5,135 | 1,515 |
| Number of shares outstanding (weighted average) | thousand | 743,554 | 743,841 |
| Basic and diluted earnings per share | € | 6.91 | 2.04 |
| Dividend per share | € | $1.10^{1}$ | 1.00 |
1 Dividend proposal for fiscal 2024, subject to the resolution of the Annual General Meeting on 30 April 2025.
Financial instruments are divided into non-derivative and derivative. Non-derivative financial assets essentially include other non-current financial assets, accounts receivable, marketable securities and cash and cash equivalents. Financial instruments are recognised either at amortised cost or at fair value, depending on their classification. Non-derivative financial instruments are recognised in the following categories:
On the liabilities side, non-derivative financial instruments principally include liabilities measured at amortised cost.
Financial instruments recognised at fair value are measured based on the published exchange price, insofar as the financial instruments are traded on an active market. The fair value of non-quoted debt and equity instruments is generally determined on the basis of expected payment flows discounted using current market interest rates corresponding to the remaining maturity, taking into consideration macro-economic developments and corporate business plan data. In part, they are also measured using external valuations, for example by banks. Depending on the availability of market parameters, the fair values of financial instruments are assigned to the three levels of the fair value hierarchy pursuant to IFRS 13.
Derivative financial instruments are recognised at their fair values as of the balance-sheet date, insofar as they fall under the scope of IFRS 9. Exchange-traded products are measured using the published closing prices of the relevant exchange. Non-exchange traded products are measured on the basis of publicly available, market standard broker quotations or, if such quotations are not available, on generally accepted valuation methods. In doing so, we draw on prices on active markets as much as possible. If such prices are not available, company-specific planning estimates are used in the measurement process. These estimates encompass all of the market factors which other market participants would take into account in the course of price determination, such as CVA/DVA. Assumptions pertaining to the energy sector and economy are made within the scope of a comprehensive process with the involvement of both in-house and external experts.
Derivative financial instruments recorded within the framework of trading activities in the Supply \& Trading segment pertain to physical and financial contracts to buy and sell electricity, natural gas, LPG and other energy trading-related contracts. All unrealised positions for these physical and financial transactions are marked to market. For both exchange-traded and over-the-counter transactions, the corresponding fair value is measured on a daily basis with the extensive use of observable and external data. The measurement of complex or long-term transactions can also include market-conform adjustments within generally recognised valuation models. Changes in fair value are
reported in the income statement under the line item 'other operating income' and 'other operating expenses'.
Measurement of the fair value of a group of financial assets and financial liabilities is conducted on the basis of the net risk exposure per business partner.
The following overview presents the classifications of financial instruments measured at fair value in the fair value hierarchy prescribed by IFRS 13. The individual levels of the fair value hierarchy are defined as follows:
Measurement using (unadjusted) prices of identical financial instruments formed on active markets,
Measurement on the basis of input parameters which are not the prices from Level 1, but which can be observed for the financial instrument either directly (i.e. as price) or indirectly (i.e. derived from prices),
Measurement using factors which cannot be observed on the basis of market data.
| Fair value hierarchy € million |
Total 31 Dec 2023 |
Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Total 31 Dec 2023 | Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other financial assets | 5,244 | 4,642 | 183 | 419 | 5,573 | 5,059 | 126 | 388 |
| Derivatives (assets) | 10,682 | 563 | 8,497 | 1,622 | 24,548 | 293 | 22,130 | 2,125 |
| of which: used for hedging purposes | 1,902 | - | 1,871 | 31 | 7,016 | 1 | 7,015 | - |
| Securities | 5,275 | 5,275 | - | - | 6,771 | 6,771 | - | - |
| Derivatives (liabilities) | 10,249 | 546 | 9,204 | 499 | 17,848 | 247 | 16,589 | 1,012 |
| of which: used for hedging purposes | 1,237 | - | 1,182 | 55 | 3,092 | 2 | 3,090 | - |
| Conditional purchase price obligations | - | - | - | - | 29 | - | 23 | 6 |
Due to the higher number of price quotations on active markets, financial assets with a fair value of $€ 9$ million (previous year: $€ 0$ million) were reclassified from Level 2 to Level 1. Conversely, due to a drop in the number of price quotations, financial assets with a fair value of $€ 1$ million (previous year: $€ 0$ million) were reclassified from Level 1 to Level 2.
The development of the fair values of Level 3 financial instruments is presented in the following table:
| Level 3 financial instruments: Development in 2024 |
Balance at 1 Jan 2023 | Changes in the scope of consolidation, currency adjustments and other | Changes | Balance at 31 Dec 2024 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Recognised in profit or loss | Recognised in OCI | With a cash effect ${ }^{1}$ | ||||
| Other financial assets | 588 | $-7$ | -19 | $-5$ | 62 | 419 |
| Derivatives (assets) | 2,125 | $-41$ | $-11$ | 31 | $-482$ | 1,622 |
| of which: used for hedging purposes | - | - | - | 31 | - | 31 |
| Derivatives (liabilities) | 1,012 | $-131$ | $-188$ | 55 | $-249$ | 499 |
| of which: used for hedging purposes | - | - | - | 55 | - | 55 |
| Conditional purchase price obligations | 6 | - | - | - | $-6$ | - |
1 This item includes purchases, sales, issues and settlements.
| Level 3 financial instruments: Development in 2023 |
Balance at 1 Jan 2023 | Changes in the scope of consolidation, currency adjustments and other | Changes | Balance at 31 Dec 2023 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Recognised in profit or loss | Recognised in OCI | With a cash effect ${ }^{1}$ | ||||
| Other financial assets | 466 | $-136$ | 3 | 6 | 49 | 388 |
| Derivatives (assets) | 4,360 | - | $-253$ | - | $-1,982$ | 2,125 |
| Derivatives (liabilities) | 1,963 | $-9$ | $-167$ | - | $-775$ | 1,012 |
| Conditional purchase price obligations | - | 6 | - | - | - | 6 |
[^0]
[^0]: 1 This item includes purchases, sales, issues and settlements.
Amounts recognised in profit or loss generated through Level 3 financial instruments relate to the following line items on the income statement:
| Level 3 financial instruments: | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amounts recognised in profit or loss | ||||
| € million | 31 Dec 2024 | Of which: attributable to financial instruments held at the balance-sheet date | Total 31 Dec 2023 | Of which: attributable to financial instruments held at the balance-sheet date |
| Other operating income / expenses | 177 | 177 | $-74$ | $-74$ |
| Income from investments | $-19$ | $-17$ | $-9$ | $-7$ |
| 158 | 160 | $-83$ | $-81$ |
Level 3 derivative financial instruments essentially consist of energy purchase and commodity agreements, as well as other energy trading-related contracts, which relate to trading periods for which there are no active markets yet. The valuation of such depends on the development of electricity, oil and gas prices in particular. All other things being equal, rising market prices cause the fair values to decline, whereas declining market prices cause them to increase. A change in pricing by $+/-10 \%$ would cause the market value to fall by $€ 41$ million (previous year: $€ 196$ million) or rise by $€ 82$ million (previous year: $€ 196$ million).
Financial assets and liabilities can be broken down into the measurement categories with the following carrying amounts according to IFRS 9 in the year under review:
| Carrying amount by category € million |
31 Dec 2024 | 31 Dec 2023 |
|---|---|---|
| Financial assets measured at fair value through profit or loss | 14,542 | 24,776 |
| of which: obligatorily measured at fair value | 14,542 | 24,776 |
| Debt instruments measured at amortised cost | 17,327 | 20,034 |
| Debt instruments measured at fair value through other comprehensive income | 289 | 283 |
| Equity instruments measured at fair value through other comprehensive income | 4,468 | 4,818 |
| Financial liabilities measured at fair value through profit or loss | 9,012 | 14,785 |
| of which: obligatorily measured at fair value | 9,012 | 14,785 |
| Financial liabilities measured at amortised cost | 22,680 | 21,051 |
The carrying amounts of financial assets and liabilities within the scope of IFRS 7 basically correspond to their fair values. The only deviations are for other assets, financial receivables and financial liabilities. The carrying amount of the other assets is $€ 10,458$ million (previous year: $€ 19,438$ million) and the fair value amounts to $€ 10,450$ million (previous year: $€ 19,438$ million). Of this, $€ 563$ million (previous year: $€ 292$ million) is related to Level 1, $€ 8,296$ million (previous year: $€ 17,021$ million) to Level 2 and $€ 1,591$ million (previous year: $€ 2,125$ million) to Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy. The carrying amount of the financial receivables is $€ 2,075$ million (previous year: $€ 2,652$ million) and the fair value amounts to $€ 2,072$ million (previous year: $€ 2,652$ million). Of this, $€ 0$ million (previous year: $€ 0$ million) is related to Level 1 and $€ 2,072$ million (previous year: $€ 2,652$ million) to Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy. The carrying amount of the financial liabilities is $€ 16,439$ million (previous year: $€ 15,115$ million) and the fair value amounts to $€ 16,360$ million (previous year: $€ 14,902$ million). Of this, $€ 6,958$ million (previous year: $€ 6,357$ million) is related to Level 1 and $€ 9,402$ million (previous year: $€ 8,545$ million) to Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy.
The following net results from financial instruments as per IFRS 7 were recognised on the income statement, depending on the category:
| Net gain/loss by category | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|
| $€$ million | ||
| Financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value through profit or loss ${ }^{1}$ | 1,637 | 1,380 |
| of which: obligatorily measured at fair value | 1,637 | 1,380 |
| Debt instruments measured at amortised cost ${ }^{1}$ | 1,011 | 684 |
| Debt instruments measured at fair value through other comprehensive income | 5 | 3 |
| Equity instruments measured at fair value through other comprehensive income | 210 | 202 |
| Financial liabilities measured at amortised cost | $-926$ | $-1,344$ |
The net result as per IFRS 7 essentially includes interest, dividends and results from the measurement of financial instruments at fair value.
The option to recognise changes in fair value in other comprehensive income is exercised for a portion of the investments in equity instruments. These are strategic investments and other long-term investments.
In fiscal 2024, €210 million (previous year: €202 million) in income from dividends from these financial instruments was recognised.
| Fair value of equity instruments measured at fair value through other comprehensive income $€$ million |
31 Dec 2024 | 31 Dec 2023 |
|---|---|---|
| Nordsee One GmbH | 31 | 36 |
| E.ON SE | 4,437 | 4,782 |
The following is an overview of the financial assets and financial liabilities which are netted out in accordance with IAS 32 or are subject to enforceable master netting agreements or similar agreements. The netted financial assets and liabilities essentially consist of collateral for stock market transactions due on a daily basis.
| Netting of financial assets and financial liabilities as of 31 Dec 2024 | Gross amounts recognised | Netting | Net amounts recognised | Related amounts not set off | Net amount | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Financial instruments | Cash collateral received / pledged | |||||
| Derivatives (assets) | 13,653 | $-12,387$ | 1,266 | - | $-530$ | 736 |
| Derivatives (liabilities) | 12,587 | $-11,342$ | 1,245 | $-546$ | $-690$ | 9 |
| Netting of financial assets and financial liabilities as of 31 Dec 2023 | Gross amounts recognised | Netting | Net amounts recognised | Related amounts not set off | Net amount | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Financial instruments | Cash collateral received / pledged | |||||
| Derivatives (assets) | 26,939 | $-25,284$ | 1,655 | - | $-1,405$ | 250 |
| Derivatives (liabilities) | 25,097 | $-24,262$ | 835 | $-93$ | $-742$ | - |
The related amounts not set off include cash collateral received and pledged for over-the-counter transactions as well as collateral pledged in advance for stock market transactions.
As an energy producer with international operations, the RWE Group is exposed to market, credit and liquidity risks in its ordinary business activity. We limit these risks via systematic, groupwide risk management. The range of action, responsibilities and controls are defined in binding internal directives.
Market risks stem from changes in exchange rates and share prices as well as interest rates and commodity prices, which can have an influence on business results.
Due to the RWE Group's international profile, currency management is a key issue. Fuels are traded in British pounds and US dollars as well as in other currencies. In addition, RWE does business in a number of currency areas. The companies of the RWE Group are required to hedge their foreign currency risks via RWE AG. Foreign currency risks arising from the involvement in and the financing of the renewable energy business are hedged by RWE Renewables International Participations B.V.
Interest rate risks stem primarily from financial debt and the Group's interest-bearing investments. We hedge against negative changes in value caused by unexpected interestrate movements using non-derivative and derivative financial instruments.
Opportunities and risks from changes in the values of non-current securities are centrally controlled by a professional fund management system operated by RWE AG.
The Group's other financial transactions are recorded using centralised risk management software and monitored by RWE AG.
For commodity operations, risk management directives have been established by RWE AG's Controlling\&Risk Management Department. These regulations stipulate that derivatives may be used to hedge price risks. Furthermore, commodity derivatives may be traded, subject to limits. Compliance with limits is monitored daily.
Risks stemming from fluctuations in commodity prices and financial market risks (foreign currency risks, interest rate risks, securities risks) are monitored and managed by RWE using indicators such as the Value at Risk (VaR) and sensitivities, amongst other things. In addition, for the management of interest rate risk, a Cash Flow at Risk (CFaR) is determined.
Using the VaR method, RWE determines and monitors the maximum expected loss arising from changes in market prices with a specific level of probability during specific periods. Historical price volatility is taken as a basis in the calculations. With the exception of the CFaR data, all VaR figures are based on a confidence interval of $95 \%$ and a holding period of one day. For the CFaR, a confidence interval of $95 \%$ and a holding period of one year is taken as a basis.
In respect of interest rate risks, RWE distinguishes between two risk categories: on the one hand, increases in interest rates can result in declines in the prices of securities from the holdings of RWE. This pertains primarily to fixed-rate instruments. Price risk is measured using sensitivity analysis in relation to an interest rate change of 100 basis points (with an effect on equity and earnings). As of the balance-sheet date, it amounted to $€ 19.5$ million (previous year: $€ 22.3$ million). On the other hand, financing costs also increase along with the level of interest rates. The sensitivity of interest expenses to increases in market interest rates is measured with the CFaR (with an effect on equity and earnings). As of 31 December 2024 this amounted to $€ 21.1$ million (previous year: $€ 43.6$ million). RWE calculates the CFaR based on the assumption of the refinancing of maturing debt.
Risks related to financial positions in foreign currency are also measured using sensitivity analysis, which shows the impact on the value of the position stemming from a 10\% change in the exchange rate (with an effect on equity and earnings). As of 31 December 2024, this sensitivity was $€ 0.1$ million (previous year: $€ 0.4$ million).
The price risk of equities in RWE's portfolio is also measured using sensitivity analysis. As of the balance-sheet date, this analysis yielded the following results (before taxes): In the event of a $10 \%$ rise in the relevant share prices, equity would increase by $€ 450$ million (previous year: $€ 480$ million) and income by $€ 0$ million (previous year: $€ 2$ million). In the event of a $10 \%$ fall in the relevant share prices, equity would decrease by $€ 450$ million (previous year: $€ 480$ million) and income by $€ 0$ million (previous year: $€ 2$ million).
The key internal control parameters for commodity positions in the Supply \& Trading segment are the VaR for the trading business and the VaR for the pipeline and liquefied natural gas (LNG) business. Here, the maximum VaR is $€ 60$ million and $€ 40$ million, respectively. As of 31 December 2024, the VaR was $€ 10.7$ million in the trading business (previous year: $€ 7.2$ million) and $€ 9.8$ million for the pooled gas and LNG business (previous year: $€ 7.5$ million).
Additionally, stress tests are carried out on a monthly basis in relation to the trading and pooled LNG and gas business in the Supply \& Trading segment to model the impact of commodity price changes on the earnings conditions and take risk-mitigating measures if necessary. In these stress tests, market price curves are modified, and the commodity position is revalued on this basis. Historical scenarios of extreme prices and realistic, fictitious price scenarios are modelled. In the event that the stress tests exceed internal thresholds, these scenarios are then analysed in detail in relation to their impact and probability, and - if necessary - risk-mitigating measures are considered.
Commodity risks of the Group's power generation companies are managed by the Commodity Management Committee (CMC) and hedged by RWE Supply \& Trading on the basis of available market liquidity in accordance with the guidelines from the Commodity Strategy Group. In accordance with the approach for long-term investments for example, it is not possible to manage commodity risks from long-term positions or positions which cannot be hedged due to their size and the prevailing market liquidity using the VaR concept. As a result, these positions are not included in the VaR figures. Above and beyond open production positions which have not yet been transferred, Group companies are not allowed to maintain significant risk positions, according to a Group guideline. Furthermore, commodity price risks may exist in the gas storage business. The subsidiaries that own the gas storage facilities manage their positions independently, in compliance with unbundling regulations.
One of our most important instruments to limit market risk is the conclusion of hedging transactions. The instruments most commonly used are forwards and options with foreign currency, interest rate swaps, interest rate currency swaps, equity derivatives and forwards, options, futures and swaps with commodities.
Maturities of derivatives related to interest rates, currencies, equity, indices and commodities for the purpose of hedging are based on the maturities of the underlying transactions and are thus primarily short term and medium term in nature. Hedges of the foreign currency risks of foreign investments have maturities of up to seven years.
All derivative financial instruments within the scope of IFRS 9 are recognised as assets or liabilities and are measured at fair value. When interpreting their positive and negative fair values, it should be taken into account that, with the exception of trading in commodities, these financial instruments are generally matched with underlying transactions that carry offsetting risks.
Hedge accounting pursuant to IFRS 9 is used primarily for mitigating currency risks from net investments in foreign functional currencies, commodity market price risks, interest risks from non-current liabilities, and currency and price risks from sales and purchase transactions.
Cash flow hedges are primarily used to hedge against interest risks from non-current liabilities as well as currency and price risks from sales and purchase transactions. Hedging instruments consist of forwards, swaps and options with foreign currency and interest rates, and forwards, futures and swaps with commodities. Changes in the fair value of the hedging instruments - insofar as they affect the effective portion - are recorded in other comprehensive income until the underlying transaction is realised. The ineffective portion of changes in value is recognised in profit or loss. When hedging commodities, underlying and hedging transactions are based on the same price index. This generally does not result in ineffectiveness; however, ineffectiveness can result from the difference in timing between the origination of the hedged item and the hedging instrument. When
hedging foreign currency risks, ineffectiveness can also result from the difference in timing between the origination of the hedged item and the hedging instrument. Ineffectiveness can likewise stem from hedges containing material foreign currency basis spreads. Upon realisation of the underlying transaction, the hedge's contribution to income from accumulated other comprehensive income is recognised on the income statement or is offset against the initial value recognition of an asset or a liability.
RWE held the following instruments to hedge future cash flows relating to foreign currency risks:
| Hedging instruments in cash flow hedges as of 31 Dec 2024 | Maturity | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1-6 months | $7-12$ months | > 12 months | |
| Currency forwards - purchases | |||
| Nominal volume (€ million) | 307 | 245 | 54 |
| Avg. EUR/USD exchange rate | 1.09 | 1.14 | 1.12 |
| Avg. EUR/GBP exchange rate | 0.85 | 0.90 | 0.91 |
| Avg. EUR/CAD exchange rate | 1.51 | 1.49 | 1.46 |
| Avg. EUR/DKK exchange rate | 7.45 | 7.44 | 7.44 |
| Avg. EUR/SGD exchange rate | 1.42 | 1.52 | - |
| Currency forwards - soles | |||
| Nominal volume (€ million) | $-723$ | $-670$ | $-205$ |
| Avg. EUR/USD exchange rate | 1.07 | 1.09 | 1.10 |
| Avg. EUR/GBP exchange rate | 0.86 | 0.90 | 0.89 |
| Avg. EUR/CAD exchange rate | - | - | - |
| Avg. EUR/DKK exchange rate | 7.45 | 7.44 | 7.45 |
| Avg. EUR/SGD exchange rate | 1.41 | - | - |
| Hedging instruments in cash flow hedges as of 31 Dec 2023 | Maturity | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1-6 months | 7-12 months | > 12 months | |
| Currency forwards - purchases | |||
| Nominal volume (€ million) | 631 | 842 | 2,152 |
| Avg. EUR/USD exchange rate | 1.13 | 1.13 | 1.21 |
| Avg. EUR/GBP exchange rate | 0.89 | 0.89 | 0.91 |
| Avg. EUR/DKK exchange rate | 7.13 | 7.14 | 7.05 |
| Avg. EUR/SGD exchange rate | 1.47 | 1.62 | 1.61 |
| Currency forwards - soles | |||
| Nominal volume (€ million) | $-197$ | $-415$ | $-1,336$ |
| Avg. EUR/GBP exchange rate | 0.87 | 0.88 | 0.91 |
| Avg. EUR/DKK exchange rate | 7.38 | 7.36 | 7.20 |
RWE held the following instruments to hedge future cash flows relating to interest risks:
| Hedging instruments in cash flow hedges as of 31 Dec 2024 | Maturity | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1-6 months | $7-12$ months | > 12 months | |
| Interest swaps | |||
| Nominal volume (€ million) | - | - | 1,158 |
| Secured average interest rate (\%) | - | - | 1.82 |
| Hedging instruments in cash flow hedges as of 31 Dec 2023 | Maturity | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1-6 months | 7-12 months | > 12 months | |
| Interest swaps | |||
| Nominal volume ( $€$ million) | - | - | 1,332 |
| Secured average interest rate (\%) | - | - | 1.85 |
The commercial optimisation of the power plant portfolio is based on a dynamic hedging strategy. Hedged items and hedging instruments are constantly adjusted based on changes in market prices, market liquidity and the sales business with consumers. Commodity prices are hedged if this leads to a positive margin. Proprietary commodities trading is strictly separated from this when managing risks.
Hedges of net investment in a foreign operation are used to hedge the foreign currency risks of net investment in foreign entities whose functional currency is not the euro. We use interest rate currency swaps and other currency derivatives as hedging instruments. If there are changes in the fair value of interest rate currency swaps, the amount of the effective portion is recorded under foreign currency translation adjustments in other comprehensive income.
The forward and spot elements of the hedging instruments used in net investment hedges are sometimes treated separately and only the value of the spot element is designated. In these cases, the fair value change of the forward element (hedging costs) is recognised in other comprehensive income to the extent that the fair value change relates to the hedged net investment. Moreover, the fair value of the forward element as of the time of designation is amortised over the duration of the hedging instrument using the straightline method. The amortisation is recognised in the items 'financial income' and 'financial expenses' on the income statement.
RWE held the following instruments to hedge net investments in foreign operations:
| Hedging instruments in net investment hedges as of 31 Dec 2024 | Maturity | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1-6 months | 7-12 months | > 12 months | |
| Currency forwards - sales | |||
| Nominal volume ( $€$ million) | - | - | $-10,112$ |
| Avg. EUR / GBP exchange rate | - | - | 0.89 |
| Avg. EUR/USD exchange rate | - | - | 1.13 |
| Hedging instruments in net investment hedges as of 31 Dec 2023 | Maturity | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1-6 months | 7-12 months | > 12 months | |
| Currency forwards - sales | |||
| Nominal volume ( $€$ million) | $-3,281$ | $-3,316$ | $-2,395$ |
| Avg. EUR/GBP exchange rate | 0.87 | 0.86 | 0.86 |
| Avg. EUR/USD exchange rate | 1.08 | - | 1.10 |
The hedging instruments designated in hedging relationships had the following effects on the company's net asset, financial and earnings position:
| Hedging instruments - effects on the net asset, financial and earnings position as of 31 Dec 2024 |
|||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| € million | Carrying value | Fair value changes in the current period | Recognised ineffectiveness | ||
| Cash flow hedges | |||||
| Interest risks | 1,158 | 175 | - | 224 | - |
| Foreign currency risks | 991 | 6 | 4 | $-3$ | - |
| Commodity price risks | 545 | 1,304 | 751 | $-2,913$ | - |
| Net investment hedges | |||||
| Foreign currency risks | 10,156 | 417 | 482 | $-185$ | $-33$ |
1 The net nominal amount stated is made up of purchases in the amount of €6,422 million and sales in the amount of €6,967 million.
| Hedging instruments - effects on the net asset, financial and earnings position as of 31 Dec 2023 |
|||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| € million | Assets | Liabilities | Fair value changes in the current period | Recognised ineffectiveness | |
| Cash flow hedges | |||||
| Interest risks | 1,332 | 139 | - | $-49$ | - |
| Foreign currency risks | 2,224 | 20 | 15 | $-1$ | - |
| Commodity price risks | $3,600^{1}$ | $6,386^{2}$ | 2,921 | 3,044 | - |
| Net investment hedges | |||||
| Foreign currency risks | 9,623 | 471 | 157 | $-115$ | $-12$ |
[^0]
[^0]: 1 The net nominal amount stated is made up of purchases in the amount of $€ 12,030$ million and sales in the amount of $€ 15,630$ million.
2 Figure restated.
The carrying amounts of the hedging instruments are recognised in the balance-sheet items 'derivatives and other assets' and 'derivatives and other liabilities'.
The hedged items designated in hedging relationships had the following effects on the company's net asset, financial and earnings position:
| Cash flow hedges and net investment hedges as of 31 Dec 2024 | Changes in fair value during the current period | Reserve for current hedges | Reserve for terminated hedges |
|---|---|---|---|
| € million | |||
| Cash flow hedges | |||
| Interest risks | 25 | 139 | $-35$ |
| Foreign currency risks | $-24$ | $-47$ | 2 |
| Commodity price risks | $-6,150$ | 5,483 | - |
| Net investment hedges | |||
| Foreign currency risks | $-295$ | 750 | 350 |
| Cash flow hedges and net investment hedges as of 31 Dec 2023 | Changes in fair value during the current period | Reserve for current hedges | Reserve for terminated hedges |
|---|---|---|---|
| € million | |||
| Cash flow hedges | |||
| Interest risks | 17 | 46 | $-39$ |
| Foreign currency risks | $-62$ | 50 | 1 |
| Commodity price risks | 4,225 | 11,629 | - |
| Net investment hedges | |||
| Foreign currency risks | 14 | 1,045 | 350 |
Amounts realised from other comprehensive income and any ineffectiveness are recognised in the items on the income statement in which the underlying transactions are also recognised with an effect on income. The amounts realised from other comprehensive income are recognised in the items 'revenue' and 'cost of materials', whereas any ineffectiveness is recognised in the items 'other operating income' and 'other operating expenses'. Amounts recognised and any ineffectiveness of hedging interest risks are recognised in 'financial income' and 'finance costs' on the income statement.
The reconciliation of the changes in the hedge reserve in relation to the various risk categories of hedge accounting follows below:
| Hedge reserve $€$ million | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|
| Bolance ot 1 Jon | 8,227 | 5,333 |
| Cash flow hedges | ||
| Effective portion of changes in market value | $-1,839$ | 717 |
| Interest risks | 81 | $-9^{1}$ |
| Foreign currency risks | $-81$ | $-60$ |
| Commodity price risks | $-1,839$ | 786 |
| Gain or loss reclassified from OCI to the income statement - realisation of underlying transactions | $-4,982$ | 6,421 |
| Interest risks | $-48$ | $-41^{1}$ |
| Commodity price risks | $-4,934$ | 6,462 |
| Gain or loss recognised as a basis adjustment | 432 | $-3,017$ |
| Foreign currency risks | 49 | 1 |
| Commodity price risks | 383 | $-3,018$ |
| Tax effect of the change in the hedge reserve | 2,010 | $-1,252$ |
| Net investment hedges | ||
| Effective portion of changes in market value | 424 | 23 |
| Foreign currency risks | 424 | 23 |
| Offsetting against currency adjustments | $-424$ | $-23$ |
| Fair value changes of hedging costs | 136 | $-17$ |
| Amortisation of hedging costs | $-41$ | 42 |
| Bolance ot 31 Dec | 3,943 | 8,227 |
1 Prior-year figure restated.
Credit risks. In the fields of finance and commodities, RWE primarily has credit relationships with banks that have good creditworthiness and other trading partners with predominantly good creditworthiness. At the same time, due to its growth strategy of developing renewables, RWE has credit relationships with suppliers which have widely varying levels of creditworthiness. RWE mitigates the related risks by establishing limits which are adjusted during the business relationships if the creditworthiness of the business partners changes. Counterparty risks are monitored constantly so that countermeasures can be initiated early on. Furthermore, RWE is exposed to credit risks due to the possibility of customers, including one large customer group which accounts for more than $10 \%$ of RWE's consolidated revenue, failing to fulfil their payment or peformance obligations as agreed, resulting in additional costs. We identify these risks by conducting regular analyses of the creditworthiness of our customers and initiate countermeasures if necessary. The aforementioned large customers are subject to a separate review.
Persistently high energy prices, inflation, elevated interest rate levels and the current economic slowdown continue to weigh on the economic situation of many companies, and RWE's business partners, competitors and customers may be impacted by the consequences of these developments. RWE is thus carefully monitoring critical branches of the economy and exercising greater caution when conducting new transactions or extending existing ones. If necessary, previously approved limits are being lowered.
Amongst other things, RWE demands guarantees, cash collateral and other forms of security in order to mitigate credit risks. To a more limited degree, RWE also concludes credit insurance policies to protect against defaults. Bank guarantees received as collateral are from financial institutions with the required good ratings. Collateral for credit insurance is pledged by insurers with an investment-grade rating.
The maximum balance-sheet default risk is derived from the carrying amounts of the financial assets stated on the balance sheet. The default risks for derivatives correspond to their positive fair values. Risks can also stem from financial guarantees and loan commitments which we have to fulfil vis-à-vis external creditors in the event of a default of a certain debtor. As of 31 December 2024, these obligations amounted to $€ 3,370$ million (previous year: $€ 1,123$ million). As of 31 December 2024, default risks were balanced against credit collateral, financial guarantees, bank guarantees and other collaterals amounting to $€ 3.0$ billion (previous year: $€ 9.3$ billion). Of this, $€ 0.9$ billion relates to trade receivables (previous year: $€ 1.4$ billion), $€ 0.3$ billion to derivatives used for hedging purposes (previous year: $€ 1.2$ billion) and $€ 1.8$ billion to other derivatives (previous year: $€ 6.7$ billion). The fair value of the collaterals which can be pledged onward amounted to $€ 0.2$ billion (previous year: $€ 0.0$ billion). There were no material defaults in fiscal 2024 or the previous year.
In the RWE Group, the risk provision for financial assets is determined on the basis of expected credit losses. These are determined on the basis of the probability of default, loss given default and the exposure at default. We determine the probability of default and loss given default using historical data and forward-looking information. The exposure at default date for financial assets is the gross carrying amount on the balance-sheet date. The expected credit loss for financial assets determined on this basis corresponds to the difference between the contractually agreed payments and the payments expected by RWE, discounted by the original effective interest rate. The assignment to one of the levels described below influences the level of the expected losses and the effective interest income recognised.
At initial recognition, financial assets are generally assigned to this stage - with the exception of those that have been purchased or originated credit impaired, which are thus considered separately. The level of impairment results from the cash flows expected for the entire term of the financial instrument, multiplied by the probability of a default within 12 months from the reporting date. The effective interest rate used for measurement is determined on the basis of the carrying amount before impairment (gross).
If the credit risk has risen significantly between initial recognition and the reporting date, the financial instrument is assigned to this stage. Unlike Stage 1, default events expected beyond the 12-month period from the reporting date are also considered in calculating the impairment. The effective interest rate used for measurement is still determined on the basis of the carrying amount before impairment (gross).
If in addition to the criteria for Stage 2 there is an objective indication of an impairment, the financial asset is assigned to Stage 3. The impairment is calculated analogously to Stage 2. In this case, however, the effective interest rate used for measurement is applied to the carrying amount after impairment (net).
In the RWE Group, risk provisions are formed for financial instruments in the following categories:
For debt instruments for which there has been no significant rise in credit risk since initial recognition, a risk provision is recognised in the amount of the expected 12-month credit losses (Stage 1). In addition, a financial instrument is assigned to Stage 1 of the impairment model if the absolute credit risk is low on the balance-sheet date.
The credit risk is classified as low if the debtor's internal or external rating is investmentgrade. For trade accounts receivable, the risk provision corresponds to the lifetime expected credit losses (Stage 2).
To determine whether a financial instrument is assigned to Stage 2 of the impairment model, it must be determined whether the credit risk has increased significantly since initial recognition. To make this assessment, we consider quantitative and qualitative information supported by our experience and assumptions regarding future developments. In so doing, special importance is accorded to the sector in which the RWE Group's debtors are active. Our experience is based on studies and data from financial analysts and government authorities, amongst others. Special attention is paid to the following developments:
Independent thereof, a significant rise in credit risk and thus an assignment of the financial instrument to Stage 2 are assumed if the contractually agreed payments are more than 30 days overdue and there is no information that contradicts the assumption of a payment default.
We draw conclusions about the potential default of a counterparty from information from internal credit risk management. If internal or external information indicates that the counterparty cannot fulfil its obligations, the associated receivables are classified as unrecoverable and assigned to Stage 3 of the impairment model.
Examples of such information are:
A payment default and an associated assignment of the financial asset to Stage 3 is also assumed if the contractually agreed payments are more than 90 days overdue and there is no information disproving the assumption of a payment default. Based on our experience, we generally assume that this assumption does not apply to trade accounts receivable.
A financial asset is impaired if there are indications that the counterparty is in serious financial difficulty and the situation is unlikely to improve. We may also take legal recourse and other measures in order to enforce the contractually agreed payments in the event of an impairment.
The following impairments were recognised for financial assets stated under the following balance-sheet items within the scope of IFRS 7:
| Impairment of financial assets | Stage 1- 12-month expected credit losses |
Stage 2- lifetime expected credit losses |
Stage 3- lifetime expected credit losses |
Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Financial receivables | ||||
| Balance at 1 Jan 2024 | 5 | - | - | 5 |
| Remeasurement due to new measurement parameters | - | 5 | - | 5 |
| Reclassifications | $-1$ | - | - | $-1$ |
| Currency adjustments | $-1$ | 1 | - | - |
| Balance at 31 Dec 2024 | 3 | 6 | - | 9 |
| Impairment of financial assets | Stage 1- 12-month expected credit losses |
Stage 2- lifetime expected credit losses |
Stage 3- lifetime expected credit losses |
Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Financial receivables | ||||
| Balance at 1 Jan 2023 | 4 | - | 11 | 15 |
| Remeasurement due to new measurement parameters |
1 | - | -11 | -10 |
| Balance at 31 Dec 2023 | 5 | - | - | 5 |
For trade accounts receivable, the expected credit loss is determined by applying the simplified approach taking account of the entire lifetime of the financial instruments.
In part, a risk provision for trade accounts receivable was not recognised due to the collateral on the books.
The following tables show the development of the risk provisions for trade accounts receivable:
| Risk provisions for trade accounts receivable $€$ million | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Balance at 1 Jan | 35 | 32 | |
| Addition | 2 | 2 | |
| Newly acquired/issued | 1 | - | |
| Change in scope of consolidation | - | 1 | |
| Balance at 31 Dec | 38 | 35 |
The following table presents the gross carrying amounts of the financial instruments under the scope of the impairment model:
| Gross carrying amounts of financial assets as of 31 Dec 2024 | Equivalent to S\&P scale | Stage 1 - 12-month expected credit losses |
Stage 2 lifetime expected credit losses | Stage 3 lifetime expected credit losses | Trade accounts receivables | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| € million | |||||||
| Class 1-5: low risk | AAA to BBB- | 10,333 | 17 | - | 6,901 | 17,251 | |
| Class 6-9: medium risk | BB+ to BB- | 113 | - | - | 401 | 514 | |
| Class 10: high risk | B+ to B- | 55 | 31 | - | 180 | 266 | |
| Class 11: doubtful | CCC to C | 20 | - | - | 21 | 41 | |
| Class 12: loss | D | - | - | 1 | 9 | 10 | |
| 10,521 | 48 | 1 | 7,512 | 18,082 |
| Gross carrying amounts of financial assets as of 31 Dec 2023 | Equivalent to S\&P scale | Stage 1 - 12-month expected credit losses |
Stage 2 lifetime expected credit losses | Stage 3 lifetime expected credit losses | Trade accounts receivables | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| € million | |||||||
| Class 1-5: low risk | AAA to BBB- | $12,331^{1}$ | 19 | - | 7,608 | 19,958 ${ }^{1}$ | |
| Class 6-9: medium risk | BB+ to BB- | 208 | 1 | - | 225 | 434 | |
| Class 10: high risk | B+ to B- | 105 | - | - | 158 | 263 | |
| Class 11: doubtful | CCC to C | 30 | - | - | 79 | 109 | |
| Class 12: loss | D | - | - | 1 | 8 | 9 | |
| $12,674^{1}$ | 20 | 1 | 8,078 | 20,773 ${ }^{1}$ |
1 Prior-year figure restated.
Liquidity risks. As a rule, RWE Group companies refinance with RWE AG. In this regard, there is a risk that liquidity reserves will prove to be insufficient to meet financial obligations in a timely manner. In 2025, liabilities owed to banks of $€ 0.4$ billion (previous year: $€ 2.2$ billion) and bonds in the amount of $€ 1.5$ billion (previous year: $€ 0.0$ billion) are due. Above and beyond this, commercial paper in the amount of $€ 0.1$ billion matures in 2025 (previous year: $€ 0.2$ billion).
As of 31 December 2024, holdings of cash and cash equivalents and current marketable securities amounted to $€ 11,941$ million (previous year: $€ 14,641$ million).
The volume of RWE AG's credit line amounts to $€ 10$ billion. It consists of three tranches: $A$ and $B$, which run until April 2026 (with volumes of $€ 3$ billion and $€ 2$ billion, respectively) and $C$, which runs until June 2027 at the latest (with a volume of $€ 5$ billion). RWE AG has two commercial paper programmes for short-term refinancing. The European commercial paper programme allows for issuance up to a maximum amount of $€ 5$ billion (previous year: $€ 5$ billion), while the US commercial paper programme allows for issuance up to a maximum amount of US $\$ 3$ billion (previous year: US $\$ 3$ billion). As of the balance-sheet date, $€ 0.1$ billion of the European programme was used (previous year: $€ 0.2$ billion); the US commercial paper programme was not used. Above and beyond this, RWE AG can finance itself using a $€ 15$ billion debt issuance programme; as of the balance-sheet date, outstanding bonds from this programme amounted to $€ 6.6$ billion (previous year: $€ 6.1$ billion) at RWE AG. Accordingly, the RWE Group's medium-term liquidity risk can be classified as low.
Financial liabilities falling under the scope of IFRS 7 are expected to result in the following (undiscounted) payments in the coming years:
| Redemption and interest payments on financial liabilities | Redemption payments | Interest payments | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Carrying amounts 31 Dec 2023 | 2025 | 2026 to 2029 | From 2030 | 2025 | 2026 to 2029 | From 2030 | |
| Bonds payable ${ }^{1}$ | 9,128 | 1,539 | 2,583 | 5,023 | 299 | 900 | 1,968 |
| Commercial paper | 50 | 50 | - | - | - | - | - |
| Bank debt ${ }^{2}$ | 4,054 | 441 | 2,054 | 1,559 | 170 | 434 | 349 |
| Lease liabilities | 2,231 | 143 | 382 | 1,711 | 72 | 280 | 891 |
| Other financial liabilities | 2,181 | 829 | 658 | 744 | 111 | 236 | 460 |
| Derivative financial liabilities | 10,249 | 8,805 | 1,391 | 53 | $-2$ | 26 | 29 |
| Collateral for trading activities | 699 | 699 | - | - | - | - | - |
| Purchase liabilities from put options | 31 | - | 31 | - | - | - | - |
| Miscellaneous other financial liabilities | 6,242 | 6,174 | 71 | 1 | - | - | - |
1 Including hybrid bonds classified as debt as per IFRS, taking into account the earliest possible coll dote.
2 Excluding deferred interest.
| Redemption and interest payments on financial liabilities | Redemption payments | Interest payments | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Carrying amounts 31 Dec 2023 | 2024 | 2025 to 2028 | From 2029 | 2024 | 2025 to 2028 | From 2029 | |
| Bonds payable ${ }^{1}$ | 6,704 | 9 | 3,604 | 3,091 | 163 | 510 | 262 |
| Commercial paper | 209 | 209 | - | - | - | - | - |
| Bank debt ${ }^{2}$ | 4,544 | 2,244 | 1,177 | 1,123 | 84 | 254 | 123 |
| Lease liabilities | 1,913 | 115 | 357 | 1,448 | 54 | 212 | 600 |
| Other financial liabilities | 1,948 | 726 | 657 | 610 | 99 | 251 | 508 |
| Derivative financial liabilities | 17,848 | $16,039^{3}$ | $937^{3}$ | 874 | 44 | 41 | 48 |
| Collateral for trading activities | 1,418 | 1,418 | - | - | - | - | - |
| Miscellaneous other financial liabilities | 5,965 | 5,929 | 78 | 2 | - | - | - |
[^0]
[^0]: 1 Including hybrid bonds classified as debt as per IFRS, taking into account the earliest possible coll dote.
2 Excluding deferred interest.
3 Restated figure.
Above and beyond this, as of 31 December 2024, there were financial guarantees for external creditors in the amount of $€ 3,323$ million (previous year: $€ 1,056$ million), which are to be allocated to the first year of repayment. Additionally, Group companies have provided loan commitments to third-party companies amounting to $€ 47$ million (previous year: $€ 67$ million), which are callable in 2025.
Detailed information on the risks of the RWE Group and on the objectives and procedures of the risk management is presented on pages 61 et seqq, in the management report.
As of 31 December 2024, the amount of contractual commitments totalled $€ 12,150$ million (previous year: $€ 8,063$ million). This mainly consisted of investment in property, plant and equipment.
We have made long-term contractual purchase commitments for supplies of fuels, including natural gas in particular. Payment obligations stemming from major long-term purchase contracts with terms of more than 5 years amounted to $€ 4.2$ billion as of 31 December 2024 (previous year: $€ 3.9$ billion), of which $€ 0.1$ billion is due within one year (previous year: $€ 0.1$ billion).
Gas purchases by the RWE Group are partially based on long-term take-or-pay contracts. The conditions in these contracts, which have terms up to 2043 in some cases, are renegotiated by the contractual partners at certain intervals, which may result in changes in the reported payment obligations. Calculation of the payment obligations resulting from the purchase contracts is based on parameters from the internal planning.
Furthermore, RWE has long-term financial commitments for purchases of electricity. As of 31 December 2024, the minimum payment obligations stemming from major purchase contracts with terms of more than 5 years totalled $€ 5.7$ billion (previous year: $€ 5.6$ billion), of which $€ 0.3$ billion is due within one year (previous year: $€ 0.3$ billion). Above and beyond this, there are also purchase and service contracts for uranium, conversion, enrichment and fabrication.
We bear legal and contractual liability from our membership in various associations which exist in connection with power plant projects, profit- and loss-transfer agreements, and for the provision of liability cover for nuclear risks, amongst others.
On the basis of a mutual benefit agreement, RWE AG and other parent companies of German nuclear power plant operators undertook to provide approximately $€ 2,244$ million in funding to liable nuclear power plant operators to ensure that they are able to meet their payment obligations in the event of nuclear damages. RWE AG has a 36.927\% contractual share in the liability, plus $5 \%$ for damage settlement costs.
As part of the Group restructuring that occurred in fiscal 2016, a large portion of the pension commitments which up to then had been reported at the holding level were transferred to former Group companies (former subsidiaries innogy SE, Essen, and affiliated companies) by cancelling the performance obligation existing on an intra-group basis. The guarantees remaining vis-à-vis external parties were cancelled. The Group is liable for the accrued claims of the active and former employees of these companies in the amount of $€ 4,244$ million (previous year: $€ 4,392$ million).
RWE AG and its subsidiaries are involved in official, regulatory and antitrust proceedings, litigation and arbitration proceedings related to their operations and are affected by the results of such. In some cases, out-of-court claims are also filed. However, RWE does not expect any material negative repercussions from these proceedings on the RWE Group's economic or financial position.
In mid-September 2023, the Dutch government resolved to pay RWE $€ 332$ million in compensation for restricting coal-fired generation in the first half of 2022. The cap was imposed as part of a 2022 amendment to the coal phaseout legislation from 2019, which stipulated that between 2022 and 2024, annual $\mathrm{CO}_{2}$ emissions from coal-fired power generation should not exceed $35 \%$ of the individual power plant's theoretical capacity.
Motivated by the war in Ukraine and the strained energy supply situation, the Dutch government lifted the $35 \% \mathrm{CO}_{2}$ limit in June 2022, meaning the cap on coal-fired generation was only effective for almost six months. The agreed compensation in September 2023 is subject to approval by the EU Commission under state aid law.
RWE is divided into five segments, which are separated from each other based on functional criteria.
In the segment Offshore Wind, we report on our business in offshore wind, which is overseen by RWE Offshore Wind. The main production sites are located in the United Kingdom and Germany. In addition to electricity generation, activities in this field also include the development and realisation of projects to expand capacity, in particular in the United Kingdom, Germany, Denmark, the USA and the Netherlands.
The operating segment RWE Clean Energy is active on the American continent, while the operating segment Onshore Wind / Solar Europe \& Australia is active in Europe (mainly in the United Kingdom, Germany, Italy, Spain, Poland and the Netherlands) as well as in Australia. Both of these segments are responsible for business activities in onshore wind, photovoltaics and some aspects of battery storage in their respective regions. In addition to electricity generation, the focus of these segments is on expanding capacities. They have comparable processes in terms of the planning, development, operation and maintenance of wind and solar farms. With regard to product and customer groups, there is also cross-segment comparability, as electricity from renewables is sold mainly in wholesale business to commercial customers. The regulatory conditions in these two segments are also comparable, as they are designed to provide economic incentives for the expansion of renewables. The main value drivers are identical and financial performance is influenced by the same factors. Bearing this in mind, these operating segments have comparable economic features and are merged together into the reporting segment Onshore Wind / Solar.
Activities with run-of-river, pumped storage, biomass and gas-fired power plants are bundled in the segment Flexible Generation (previously: Hydro / Biomass / Gas). It also contains the Dutch power stations Amer and Eemshaven, which use hard coal and biomass, certain battery storage units and the company RWE Technology International, which specialises in project management and engineering services. This segment is the responsibility of RWE Generation, which is also responsible for formulating and implementing RWE's hydrogen strategy. The $37.9 \%$ stake in the Austrian energy utility KELAG and the pro-rata activities of the Dutch power plant operator EPZ (30\%) are also reported in Flexible Generation.
The segment Supply \& Trading handles trading in electricity, pipeline gas, LNG and other energy commodities. This segment is the responsibility of RWE Supply \& Trading, which also oversees key account sales, the gas storage business and development of LNG infrastructure. It also supports the Group's generation companies, for example by marketing their output to third parties and optimising power plant dispatch in the short term; income from these activities is assigned to the respective generation companies. RWE Supply \& Trading is also responsible for the acquisition of fuels and emissions allowances, which we require for electricity generation.
The segment Phaseout Technologies (formerly Coal / Nuclear), which represents our non-core business, includes our lignite mining, generation and refining operations in the Rhenish region as well as decommissioning our now-closed nuclear power plants. RWE Power is responsible for these operations.
'Other, consolidation' covers the corporate headquarters RWE AG, consolidation effects and the activities of other business areas which are not presented separately. These activities primarily include the shareholdings in the German transmission system operator Amprion (25.1\%), in Uranit (50\%), which holds a $33 \%$ stake in uranium enrichment specialist Urenco, and in E.ON ( $15 \%$ ); the E.ON dividend is reported in the financial result.
In the previous year, the pro-rata activities of the Dutch nuclear power plant operator EPZ and the investment in Uranit were assigned to the Phaseout Technologies segment. The prior-year figures were adjusted in accordance with the new segment classification.
| Segment reporting Divisions 2024 € million |
Offshore Wind | Onshore Wind/Solar | Flexible Generation | Supply \& Trading | Other, consolidation | Core business | Phaseout Technologies | Consolidation | RWE Group |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| External revenue (incl. natural gas tax/electricity tax) | 1,071 | 2,394 | 1,090 | 19,071 | 2 | 23,628 | 811 | - | 24,439 |
| Intra-group revenue | 1,316 | 1,111 | 8,277 | 8,051 | $-16,800$ | 1,955 | 4,525 | $-6,480$ | - |
| Total revenue | 2,387 | 3,505 | 9,367 | 27,122 | $-16,798$ | 25,583 | 5,336 | $-6,480$ | 24,439 |
| External revenue (excl. natural gas tax/electricity tax) | 1,071 | 2,394 | 1,092 | 18,865 | 2 | 23,424 | 800 | - | 24,224 |
| Cost of materials | 654 | 1,697 | 7,326 | 25,565 | $-16,828$ | 18,414 | 3,409 | $-6,415$ | 15,408 |
| Adjusted EBIT | 895 | 559 | 1,464 | 653 | $-10$ | 3,561 | - | - | 3,561 |
| Operating income from investments | 100 | 2 | 194 | $-32$ | 221 | 485 | - | - | 485 |
| Operating income from investments accounted for using the equity method | 99 | 1 | 195 | 9 | 220 | 524 | - | - | 524 |
| Operating depreciation, amortisation and impairment losses | 664 | 943 | 485 | 26 | 1 | 2,119 | - | - | 2,119 |
| Impairment losses | 334 | 343 | 668 | 3 | - | 1,348 | 40 | $-1$ | 1,387 |
| Write-backs | - | - | 33 | 7 | - | 40 | 19 | - | 59 |
| Adjusted EBITDA | 1,559 | 1,502 | 1,949 | 679 | $-9$ | 5,680 | - | - | 5,680 |
| Adjusted cash flow Phaseout Technologies | - | - | - | - | - | - | 584 | - | - |
| Capital expenditure on intangible assets, property, plant and equipment | 3,685 | 4,838 | 515 | 70 | - | 9,108 | 269 | - | 9,377 |
| Regions 2024 € million |
Germany | UK | Rest of Europe | North America | Other | RWE Group |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| External revenue ${ }^{1,2}$ | 11,217 | 5,315 | 5,784 | 1,567 | 341 | 24,224 |
| Intangible assets and property, plant and equipment | 7,040 | 17,613 | 4,670 | 18,946 | 439 | 48,708 |
[^0]
[^0]: 1 Excluding natural gas tax/electricity tax.
2 Broken down by the region in which the service was provided.
| Segment reporting Divisions 2023 € million |
Offshore Wind | Onshore Wind/Solar | Flexible Generation ${ }^{1}$ | Supply \& Trading | Other, consolidation ${ }^{2}$ | Core business ${ }^{3}$ | Phaseout Technologies ${ }^{4}$ | Consolidation | RWE Group ${ }^{5}$ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| External revenue (incl. natural gas tax/electricity tax) | 1,202 | 2,295 | 1,235 | 23,147 | - | 27,879 | 810 | - | 28,689 |
| Intra-group revenue | 1,201 | 984 | 10,423 | 8,532 | $-18,938$ | 2,202 | 4,464 | $-6,666$ | - |
| Total revenue | 2,403 | 3,279 | 11,658 | 31,679 | $-18,938$ | 30,081 | 5,274 | $-6,666$ | 28,689 |
| External revenue (excl. natural gas tax/electricity tax) | 1,202 | 2,295 | 1,235 | 22,989 | - | 27,721 | 800 | - | 28,521 |
| Cost of materials | 609 | 1,694 | 8,011 | 28,520 | $-18,904$ | 19,930 | 3,837 | $-6,608$ | 17,159 |
| Adjusted EBIT | 1,010 | 535 | 2,695 | 1,520 | 42 | 5,802 | - | - | 5,802 |
| Operating income from investments | 104 | 13 | 160 | $-14$ | 286 | 549 | - | - | 549 |
| Operating income from investments accounted for using the equity method | 99 | 9 | 154 | - | 286 | 548 | - | - | 548 |
| Operating depreciation, amortisation and impairment losses | 654 | 713 | 522 | 58 | - | 1,947 | - | - | 1,947 |
| Impairment losses | 169 | 27 | 647 | 19 | $-1$ | 861 | 1,086 | - | 1,947 |
| Write-backs | - | 7 | 7 | - | - | 14 | 9 | - | 23 |
| Adjusted EBITDA | 1,664 | 1,248 | 3,217 | 1,578 | 42 | 7,749 | - | - | 7,749 |
| Adjusted cash flow Phaseout Technologies | - | - | - | - | - | - | 117 | - | - |
| Capital expenditure on intangible assets, property, plant and equipment | 1,349 | 2,709 | 617 | 151 | - | 4,826 | 320 | - | 5,146 |
1 Some prior-year figures restated due to the change in the accounting treatment of the German capacity reserve (see pages 211 et seq.) and the change in the segment classification of the pro-rotta activities of the Dutch nuclear power plant operator EPZ (see pages 275 et seq.)
2 Some prior-year figures restated due to the change in the segment classification of the investment in Urant (see pages 275 et seq.)
3 Some prior-year figures restated due to the change in the accounting treatment of the German capacity reserve (see pages 211 et seq.) and the change in the segment classification of the pro-rotta activities of the Dutch nuclear power plant operator EPZ and the investment in Urant (see pages 275 et seq.).
4 Some prior-year figures restated due to the change in the reporting of the result from Phaseout Technologies in the non-operating result (see page 279) and the change in the segment classification of the pro-rotta activities of the Dutch nuclear power plant operator EPZ and the investment in Urant (see pages 275 et seq.).
5 Some prior-year figures restated due to the change in the accounting treatment of the German capacity reserve (see pages 211 et seq.) and the change in the reporting of the result from Phaseout Technologies in the non-operating result (see page 279).
| Regions 2023 € million |
Germany | UK | Rest of Europe | North America | Other | RWE Group |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| External revenue ${ }^{1,2,3}$ | 13,708 | 7,647 | 5,576 | 1,209 | 381 | 28,521 |
| Intangible assets and property, plant and equipment | 6,185 | 13,269 | 4,484 | 14,284 | 373 | 38,595 |
[^0]
[^0]: 1 Excluding natural gas tax/electricity tax.
2 Broken down by the region in which the service was provided.
3 Prior-year figures restated due to the change in the accounting treatment of the German capacity reserve; see pages 211 et seq.
| External revenue by product | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|
| € million | ||
| External revenue ${ }^{1}$ | 24,224 | 28,521 |
| of which: electricity ${ }^{2}$ | 21,047 | 25,038 |
| of which: gas | 1,805 | 1,750 |
| of which: other revenue | 1,372 | 1,733 |
1 Excluding natural gas tox/electricity tox.
2 Prior-year figure restated due to the change in the accounting treatment of the German capacity reserve; see pages 211 et seq.
Notes on segment data. We report revenue between the segments as RWE intro-group revenue. Internal supply of goods and services is settled at arm's length conditions.
Adjusted EBITDA is used for the internal management of the segments comprising the core business. This indicator is defined as earnings, depreciation and amortisation, the financial result and taxes, adjusted to exclude aperiodic or non-operating effects. The following table presents the reconciliation of adjusted EBITDA to adjusted EBIT and income before tax:
| Reconciliation of income 2024 | Adjusted | Adjustments | Figures before adjustments |
|---|---|---|---|
| € million | |||
| Adjusted EBITDA / Income before depreciation, amortisation, impairment losses, financial result and tax |
5,680 | 3,883 | 9,563 |
| (Operating) Depreciation, amortisation and impairment losses |
$-2,119$ | $-1,115$ | $-3,234$ |
| Adjusted EBIT / Income before financial result and tax |
3,561 | 2,768 | 6,329 |
| (Adjusted) Financial result | $-466$ | 480 | 14 |
| (Adjusted) Income before tax | 3,095 | 3,248 | 6,343 |
| (Operating) Taxes on income | $-619$ | $-435$ | $-1,054$ |
| (Adjusted) Income | 2,476 | 2,813 | 5,289 |
| Non-controlling interests | $-154$ | - | $-154$ |
| (Adjusted) Net income | 2,322 | 2,813 | 5,135 |
| Reconciliationof income 2023 | Adjusted | Adjustments | Figures before |
|---|---|---|---|
| € million | figures | adjustments | |
| Adjusted EBITDA / Income before depreciation, amortisation, impairment losses, financial result and tax |
7,749 | 517 | 8,266 |
| (Operating) Depreciation, amortisation and impairment losses |
$-1,947$ | $-1,877$ | $-3,824$ |
| Adjusted EBIT / Income before financial result and tax |
5,802 | $-1,360$ | 4,442 |
| (Adjusted) Financial result | $-495$ | 52 | $-443$ |
| (Adjusted) Income before tax | 5,307 | $-1,308$ | 3,999 |
| (Operating) Taxes on income | $-1,062$ | $-1,275$ | $-2,337$ |
| (Adjusted) Income | 4,245 | $-2,583$ | 1,662 |
| Non-controlling interests | $-147$ | - | $-147$ |
| (Adjusted) Net income | 4,098 | $-2,583$ | 1,515 |
Income and expenses that are unusual from an economic perspective, or stem from exceptional events, prejudice the assessment of operating activities. They are reclassified to the non-operating result. In addition to proceeds from the disposal of shareholdings or non-current assets not necessary for operations, this item mainly covers effects from the valuation of certain derivatives. These involve valuation effects which are only temporary and mainly arise because financial instruments to hedge price risks are reported at their fair value on the respective reporting date, while the hedged underlying transactions may only be recorded with an effect on income upon the realisation of such. One-off effects such as the adjustment of discount rates, which we use to determine nuclear power or mining provisions and temporary gains or losses stemming from the measurement of currency derivatives used for hedging purposes are not included in the financial result. Since 2024 the entire earnings contribution of the Phaseout Technologies segment (formerly Coal / Nuclear) is reported in the non-operating result. In order to ensure the comparability of the current figures with those from the previous year, the latter have been adjusted retroactively. The non-operating result corresponds to the adjustments to income before tax.
The adjustments to EBIT amounted to $€ 2,768$ million (previous year: -€1,360 million). The largest individual items were temporary effects from the valuation of derivatives of $€ 2,070$ million (previous year: $€ 1,395$ million). At $€ 1,595$ million, EBIT for Phaseout Technologies was significantly higher than in 2023 (previous year: -€2,422 million). One factor here was that we were able to release provisions for impending losses for long-term power purchase agreements, while the previous year was negatively impacted by impairments on lignite-fired power plants and mining operations. Additionally, this segment's operating earnings also improved. The result for the line item 'other' fell to -€894 million (previous year: -€454 million), in part because we recognised impairment on our Dutch power plant portfolio, due to more conservative margin expectations.
Adjustments to the financial result yielded a contributiuon of $€ 480$ million (previous year: $€ 52$ million). One positive factor was the rise in discount rates for the calculation of our non-current provisions and recognition of the ensuing reduction in the present value of the obligations with an effect on profit or loss.
| Non-operating result ${ }^{1}$ $€$ million |
2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|
| Adjustments to EBIT | 2,768 | $-1,360$ |
| Of which: | ||
| Disposal result | $-3$ | 121 |
| Effects on income from the valuation of derivatives | 2,070 | 1,395 |
| EBIT from Phaseout Technologies | 1,595 | $-2,422$ |
| Other | $-894$ | $-454$ |
| Adjustments to the financial result | 480 | 52 |
| Non-operating result | 3,248 | $-1,308$ |
1 Some prior-year figures restated due to the change in the reporting of the result from the Phaseout Technologies segment in the non-operating result; see page 279.
The Phaseout Technologies segment is managed using an adjusted cash flow figure, which is determined by deducting net investments from the cash flows of operating activities. In addition, non-periodic effects from the use of provisions (with a cash effect) are eliminated and periodic (non-cash) effects from additions/reversals of provisions are included.
Phaseout Technologies generated an adjusted cash flow of $€ 584$ million in 2024, up $€ 467$ million on the previous year. During the reporting period, we recorded exceptionally high margins on electricity forward sales and the commercial optimisation of power plant dispatch. Proceeds from the sale of land also had a positive effect. One offsetting factor was that the Emsland nuclear power station, which was decommissioned in April 2023, no longer contributed to power generation.
| Reconciliation to adjusted cash flow from Phaseout Technologies | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|
| € million | 6,620 | $\mathbf{4 , 2 2 3}$ |
| Cash flows from operating activities | -5,824 | -3,381 |
| Cash flows from operating activities of the core business | $\mathbf{7 9 6}$ | $\mathbf{8 4 2}$ |
| Cash flows from operating activities of Phaseout Technologies | -171 | -287 |
| Net investments of Phaseout Technologies | 3,328 | 3,074 |
| Use of provisions | -2,385 | -2,251 |
| Additions to/reversals of provisions | -984 | -1,261 |
| Other | $\mathbf{5 8 4}$ | $\mathbf{1 1 7}$ |
| Adjusted cash flow from Phaseout Technologies |
In addition to changes in the working capital of the phaseout technologies, the line item 'other' mainly includes interest received from other business areas of the RWE Group and the annual payment received for claims to compensatory payments for the German límite phaseout.
The cash flow statement classifies cash flows according to operating, investing and financing activities. Cash and cash equivalents in the cash flow statement correspond to the amount stated on the balance sheet. Cash and cash equivalents consist of cash on hand, demand deposits and fixed-interest marketable securities with a maturity of three months or less from the date of acquisition.
Among other things, cash flows from operating activities include:
Cash flows from the acquisition and sale of consolidated subsidiaries and other business units are included in cash flows from investing activities, while effects stemming from exchange rate developments and other changes in value are shown separately. During the fiscal year, reduced by the amount of cash and cash equivalents disposed of, sales prices in the amount of €94 million (previous year: €351 million) were recognised for disposals resulting in a change of control. During the fiscal year, increased by the amount of cash and cash equivalents acquired, purchase prices amounting to $€ 1,220$ million (previous year: $€ 4,575$ million) were recognised for acquisitions which also resulted in a change of control. As in the previous year, the purchase prices paid and sales prices received were effected exclusively in cash. In relation to this, cash and cash equivalents (disregarding assets held for sale) were acquired in the amount of $€ 57$ million (previous year: $€ 78$ million) and were sold in the amount of $€ 1$ million (previous year: $€ 30$ million).
With regard to subsidiaries or other business units of which control was gained or lost, the amounts of assets and liabilities (with the exception of cash and cash equivalents) are presented in the following, broken down by main groups:
| Balance-sheet items | Additions | Disposals | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| € million | 2024 | 2023 | 2024 | 2023 |
| Non-current assets | 1,474 | 8,467 | $-184$ | $-317$ |
| Intangible assets | 573 | 4,459 | - | $-5$ |
| Property, plant and equipment | 806 | 3,686 | $-184$ | $-310$ |
| Other non-current assets | 95 | 322 | - | $-2$ |
| Current assets | 77 | 1,054 | $-2$ | $-62$ |
| Non-current liabilities | 121 | 3,481 | - | $-64$ |
| Provisions | - | 98 | - | $-15$ |
| Financial liabilities | - | 2,317 | - | $-7$ |
| Other non-current liabilities | 121 | 1,066 | - | $-42$ |
| Current liabilities | 94 | 1,401 | $-97$ | $-79$ |
Cash flows from financing activities include €744 million (previous year: €669 million) which was distributed to RWE shareholders, and €262 million (previous year: €274 million) which was distributed to non-controlling shareholders. Furthermore, cash flows from financing activities include purchases and sales amounting to $€ 0$ million and $€ 494$ million (previous year: $€ 34$ million and $€ 0$ million), respectively, of shares in subsidiaries and other business units which did not lead to a change of control.
Changes in liabilities from financing activities are presented in the following table:
| Development of financial liabilities | 1 Jan 2024 | Increase/ repayment | Changes in the scope of consolidation | Currency effects | Other changes | 31 Dec 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| € million | ||||||
| Current financial liabilities | 2,964 | $-2,172$ | 224 | $-51$ | 2,933 | 3,898 |
| Non-current financial liabilities | 14,064 | 3,211 | $-1$ | 385 | $-2,887$ | 14,772 |
| Other items | 631 |
| Development of financial liabilities | 1 Jan 2023 | Increase/ repayment | Changes in the scope of consolidation | Currency effects | Other changes | 31 Dec 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| € million | ||||||
| Current financial liabilities | 11,214 | $-8,176$ | 526 | $-34$ | $-566$ | 2,964 |
| Non-current financial liabilities | 9,789 | 1,459 | 2,292 | $-110$ | 634 | 14,064 |
| Other items | 6,141 |
The amount stated in the 'other items' line item contains cash-effective changes resulting from derivative financial instruments and margin payments, which are recognised in cash flows from financing activities in the cash flow statement and in financial receivables in the balance sheet.
In addition to interest expenses, which are reported in cash flows from operating activities, the line item 'other changes' also includes the recognition of lease liabilities amounting to $€ 390$ million (previous year: $€ 294$ million).
Restrictions on the disposal of cash and cash equivalents amounted to $€ 5$ million (previous year: $€ 2$ million).
Within the framework of their ordinary business activities, RWE AG and its subsidiaries have business relationships with numerous companies. These include associated companies and joint ventures, which are classified as related parties. In particular, this category includes material investments of the RWE Group, which are accounted for using the equity method.
Business transactions were concluded with major associates and joint ventures, resulting in the following items in RWE's consolidated financial statements:
| Key items from transactions with associates and joint ventures € million |
Associated companies | Joint ventures | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| $\mathbf{2 0 2 3}$ | $\mathbf{2 0 2 3}$ | $\mathbf{2 0 2 4}$ | $\mathbf{2 0 2 3}$ | |
| Income | 835 | 1,036 | 156 | 152 |
| Expenses | 344 | 464 | 49 | 46 |
| Receivables | 578 | 677 | 96 | 41 |
| Liabilities | 192 | 194 | 61 | 100 |
The key items from transactions with associates and joint ventures mainly stem from supply and service transactions. In addition to supply and service transactions, there are also financial links with joint ventures. During the reporting period, income of $€ 10$ million (previous year: $€ 0$ million) was recorded from interest-bearing loans to joint ventures. As of the balance-sheet date, financial receivables accounted for $€ 71$ million of the receivables from joint ventures (previous year: $€ 32$ million). All transactions were completed at arm's length conditions, i.e. on principle the conditions of these transactions did not differ from those with other enterprises. $€ 591$ million of the receivables (previous year: $€ 679$ million) and $€ 55$ million of the liabilities (previous year: $€ 243$ million) fall due within one year. Other obligations from executory contracts amounted to $€ 159$ million (previous year: $€ 166$ million). In addition, there were obligations from executory power supply contracts in the amount of $€ 17$ million (previous year: $€ 0$ million).
Above and beyond this, the RWE Group did not execute any material transactions with related companies or persons.
The members of the Executive Board and Supervisory Board of RWE AG are deemed to be key management personnel for the RWE Group, in respect of whom the following information on total compensation is to be reported pursuant to IAS 24.
For fiscal 2024, key management personnel (Executive and Supervisory Board members) received total compensation in the amount of $€ 11,675,000$ (previous year: $€ 19,412,000$ ), which was comprised of $€ 10,903,000$ in short-term compensation components (previous year: $€ 12,209,000$ ) and share-based payments within the framework of LTIP SPP (see (21) Share-based payment) amounting to $€ 772,000$ (previous year: $€ 7,203,000$ ). Share-based payment was measured according to IFRS 2. Provisions totalling $€ 12,050,000$ (previous year: $€ 22,138,000$ ) were formed for obligations vis-à-vis key management personnel.
The following information pertains to total remuneration pursuant to the guidelines of German commercial law.
In total, the remuneration of the Executive Board amounted to $€ 11,756,000$ (previous year: $€ 14,176,000$ ). This contains share-based payments amounting to $€ 4,604,000$ (115,418 RWE performance shares) granted within the framework of the LTIP SPP. In the previous year, share-based payments amounting to $€ 4,684,000$ (111,961 RWE performance shares) were granted.
Including remuneration from subsidiaries for the exercise of mandates, the Supervisory Board received total remuneration of $€ 3,600,000$ (previous year: $€ 3,603,000$ ) in fiscal 2024. The employee representatives on the Supervisory Board have labour contracts with the respective Group companies. Remuneration occurs in accordance with the relevant contractual conditions.
During the period under review, no loans or advances were granted to members of the Executive Board. Two employee representatives on the Supervisory Board had employee loans totalling $€ 9,000$.
Former members of the Executive Board and their surviving dependants received $€ 13,199,000$ (previous year: $€ 13,304,000$ ), of which $€ 698,000$ came from subsidiaries (previous year: $€ 698,000$ ). As of the balance-sheet date, $€ 112,979,000$ (previous year: $€ 115,711,000$ ) were accrued for defined benefit obligations to former members of the Executive Board and their surviving dependants. Of this, $€ 4,766,000$ was set aside at subsidiaries (previous year: $€ 5,120,000$ ).
Information on the members of the Executive and Supervisory Boards is presented on pages 346 et seqq. of the Notes.
The fees for audit services primarily contain the fees for the audit of the consolidated financial statements and for the audit of the financial statements of RWE AG and its subsidiaries, along with the review of the interim statements. Other assurance services mainly include fees for reviews related to statutory or court-ordered requirements.
RWE recognised the following fees as expenses for the services rendered by the auditors of the consolidated financial statements, Deloitte GmbH Wirtschaftsprüfungsgesellschaft (Deloitte) (previous year: PricewaterhouseCoopers GmbH Wirtschaftsprüfungsgesellschaft [PwC]) and companies belonging to Deloitte's international network (previous year: PwC's international network):
| Deloitte network fees (Previous year: PwC network fees) |
2024 | 2023 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| $€$ million | Total | Of which: Germany |
Total | Of which: Germany |
| Audit services | 18.2 | 9.1 | 17.0 | 8.6 |
| Other assurance services | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.7 | 0.5 |
| 18.7 | 9.6 | 17.7 | 9.1 |
In fiscal 2024, the following German subsidiaries made partial use of the exemption clause pursuant to Sec. 264, Para. 3 and Sec. 264b of the German Commercial Code (HGB):
In the period from 1 January 2025 until the completion of the consolidated financial statements on 27 February 2025, the following significant events occurred:
New US administration evaluates wind projects. Upon taking office in January 2025, US President Donald Trump set a new course for the country's energy and climate policy by signing several executive orders. Among other things, he announced that the USA would withdraw from the Paris Climate Agreement and declared a national energy emergency in order to facilitate the development of new oil and gas fields as well as the construction of new power plants. Furthermore, President Trump suspended the issuance of any federal permits for offshore wind projects and ordered a comprehensive review of federal approval processes for wind projects. Initiatives on federally-owned sites that have already been approved will also be subjected to an extensive review.
It is impossible to predict the consequences of the change of course in US energy policy for the expansion of renewable energy in the USA at this time. We assume that support for onshore wind projects in the construction phase is secure. However, we believe that the situation regarding our current offshore wind projects is less certain. After the presidential elections in November 2024, we decided to reduce our expenditure on these projects to a minimum for now. RWE holds the right to develop wind projects at three US coastal sites. The Community Offshore Wind project in the New York Bight has progressed the furthest, but has not yet reached the construction phase. We had already secured a preliminary offtake agreement for a portion of the electricity with the State of New York. However, it was not finalised as the turbine manufacturer rescinded its supply commitment and the contract did not cover the resulting added cost. We intend to continue all three offshore projects if possible under the framework conditions. As a result of the delays, our capital expenditure in 2025 and 2026 will be lower than budgeted. The savings will be transferred to a share buyback programme, on which we report on page 39.
New tariffs in the USA - allegations of price dumping against solar module manufacturers in Southeast Asia. In February 2025, the US government decided to introduce a $25 \%$ tax on steel and aluminium imports. In addition, duties were imposed on goods from Canada, Mexico and China. Imports that are already subject to tariffs are also affected. The surcharge for products from China has been set at $10 \%$. Goods from Mexico and Canada are subject to a $25 \%$ tariff, although an exception has been made for Canadian fuel, which is taxed at $10 \%$. The tariffs for Canada and Mexico were suspended, however, after the countries committed to strengthen controls along their borders to the United States. The new tariffs also affect countries in Southeast Asia, where we source components for solar modules. In late 2024, following an extensive probe, the US Department of Commerce declared that many solar module manufacturers in Cambodia, Malaysia, Thailand and Vietnam received subsidies, enabling them to sell their products at giveaway prices in the USA. The probe's findings are pending official confirmation, which is expected to be received in the second quarter of 2025. Despite this, provisional tariffs have already been imposed on the imports of most of the affected companies. These duties range between $21 \%$ and $271 \%$.
Lower net investment until 2030. Over the 6-year period from 2025 to 2030, RWE is planning net investments totalling $€ 35$ billion. This figure is one-fourth lower than previously scheduled for this period. The reduction reflects the changes in overall conditions in the energy sector. Moreover, we increased the yield expectations for projects. The planned reduction in net investment does not result in the recoverable amounts of goodwill for the cash-generating units falling below the respective carrying amounts of the units.
The declaration on the German Corporate Governance Code prescribed by Sec. 161 of the German Stock Corporation Act (AktG) has been submitted for RWE AG and has been made permanently and publicly available to shareholders on the Internet pages of RWE AG. ${ }^{1}$
Essen, 27 February 2025
The Executive Board

Krebber

Müller

van Doren
List of shareholders as per Sec. 285 No. 11 and No. 11a and Sec. 313 Para. 2 (in relation to Sec. 315e Para. 1) of HGB as of 31 December 2024
| I. Affiliated companies which are included in the consolidated financial statements | Shareholding in \% | Equity | Net income / loss | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Direct | Total | $€^{\prime} 000$ | $€^{\prime} 000$ | |
| 1525 White Marsh, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | - | - | |
| 360 Solar Center, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | - | - | |
| 5045 Wind Partners, LLC, Des Moines/USA | 100 | $-2,939$ | 231 | |
| 924 Hosier, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | - | - | |
| 951 Hosier, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | - | - | |
| Adams Wind Form, LLC, Roseville/USA | 100 | - | - | |
| Aktivabedríf Wind Nederland B.V., Geertruidenberg/Netherlands | 100 | $42,325$ | 12,465 | |
| Alpough 50, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | $-41,125$ | $-1,074$ | |
| Alpough BESS, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | $-645$ | $-620$ | |
| Alpough North, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | $-20,209$ | $-1,458$ | |
| Alpha Solar sp. z o.o., Warsaw/Poland | 100 | $-2,230$ | $-2,513$ | |
| Altamont NY 1, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | - | - | |
| Altamont NY 2, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | - | - | |
| Altamont NY 3, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | - | - | |
| Alte Hoase Bergwerks-Verwaltungs-Gesellschaft mbH, Dortmund | 100 | $-68,046$ | 1,118 | |
| Amherst Solar, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | - | - | |
| Amrum-Offshore West GmbH, Essen | 100 | 2,632 | $-1$ | |
| Anacacho Holdco, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | 58,268 | $-16$ | |
| Anacacho Wind Farm, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | 65,462 | $-2,870$ | |
| Andromeda Wind s.r.l., Bolzano/Italy | 100 | 12,301 | 1,904 | |
| An Suidhe Wind Farm Limited, Swindon/United Kingdom | 100 | 17,278 | 2,258 |
[^0]
[^0]: 1 Profit and loss-pooling agreement.
2 Figures from the Group's consolidated financial statements.
3 Newly founded, Financial statements not yet available.
4 Control by virtue of company contract.
5 No control by virtue of company contract.
6 Significant influence via indirect investments.
7 Significant influence by virtue of company contract.
8 No significant influence by virtue of company contract.
| I. Affiliated companies which are included in the consolidated financial statements | Shareholding in \% | Equity | Net income / loss | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Direct | Total | $€^{\prime} 000$ | $€^{\prime} 000$ | ||
| Arizona Georgia Equity Holdings, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | - | - | ||
| Arizona Georgia Portfolio Holdings, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | 78,958 | $-2,080$ | ||
| Arizona MS5 Equity Holdings, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | - | - | ||
| Arizona MS5 Portfolio Holdings, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | 169,301 | 1,161 | ||
| Arlington Valley Solar Energy III, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | - | - | ||
| Arlington Valley Solar Energy, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | 5,440 | 5,230 | ||
| Ashwood Solar I, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | 88 | $-14,177$ | ||
| Avolta Storage Limited, Kilkenny/Ireland | 100 | 2,790 | 2,247 | ||
| Baron Winds II LLC, Chicago/USA | 100 | $-3,544$ | $-3,407$ | ||
| Baron Winds LLC, Chicago/USA | 100 | 236,943 | 12,332 | ||
| Battle Mountain Solar 2, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | - | - | ||
| Battle Mountain SP, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | $-315,757$ | $-4,365$ | ||
| BGE Betelligungs-Gesellschaft für Energieunternehmen mbH, Essen | 100 | 100 | 201 | -1 | |
| Big Star Class B, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | 230,649 | $-195$ | ||
| Big Star Holdco, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | 227,407 | $-1,460$ | ||
| Big Star Solar, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | 104,503 | 12,456 | ||
| Big Timber Wind LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | $-60,158$ | $-964$ | ||
| Bilbster Wind Farm Limited, Swindon/United Kingdom | 100 | 6,967 | 861 | ||
| Blackjack Creek Wind Farm, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | 311,381 | 9,601 | ||
| Blackstone MA 1, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | - | - | ||
| Blue Rock Solar, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | $-2,370$ | $-2,278$ | ||
| Bobilli BS5, LLC, Roseville/USA | 100 | - | - | ||
| Boiling Springs Holdco, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | 155,198 | $-150$ | ||
| Boiling Springs Wind Farm, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | 102,564 | $-41,474$ | ||
| Bray Offshore Wind Limited, Kilkenny/Ireland | $50^{4}$ | $-303$ | $-117$ | ||
| Bridgeville DEA, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | - | - |
[^0]
[^0]: 1 Profit and loss-pooling agreement.
2 Figures from the Group's consolidated financial statements.
3 Newly founded, Financial statements not yet available.
4 Control by virtue of company contract.
5 No control by virtue of company contract.
6 Significant influence via indirect investments.
7 Significant influence by virtue of company contract.
8 No significant influence by virtue of company contract.
| I. Affiliated companies which are included in the consolidated financial statements | Shareholding in \% | Equity | Net income / loss | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Direct | Total | $€^{\prime} 000$ | $€^{\prime} 000$ | ||
| Bright Arrow Solar, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | 662,846 | 27,496 | ||
| Bruenning's Breeze Holdco, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | 205,043 | $-100$ | ||
| Bruenning's Breeze Wind Farm, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | 146,128 | 41,910 | ||
| Buffalo Solar Farm, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | $-2,416$ | $-2,323$ | ||
| Bursjölden Vind AB, Malmö/Sweden | 100 | 424 | $-73$ | ||
| Campbell County Wind Farm 2, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | - | - | ||
| Campbell County Wind Farm, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | $-182,920$ | $-2,602$ | ||
| Comp Creek Wind, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | $-5,181$ | $-4,980$ | ||
| Comp Solar LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | - | - | ||
| Canopy Offshore Wind, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | $-17$ | $-16$ | ||
| Carl Scholl GmbH, Cologne | 100 | 968 | 76 | ||
| Carmagnola Sp. z o.o., Warsaw/Poland | 100 | 23 | $-5,344$ | ||
| Cornedd Wen Wind Farm Limited, Swindon/United Kingdom | 100 | $-5,834$ | $-299$ | ||
| Cortwheel BESS, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | $-2,204$ | $-2,105$ | ||
| Carver MA 3, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | - | - | ||
| Casey Fork Solar, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | $-2,804$ | $-2,695$ | ||
| Cassadaga Class B Holdings LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | 184,817 | $-218$ | ||
| Cassadaga Wind Holdings LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | 180,581 | $-482$ | ||
| Cassadaga Wind LLC, Chicago/USA | 100 | 230,027 | $-74,814$ | ||
| CED Alamo 3, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | $-7,434$ | $-202$ | ||
| CED Alamo 5, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | 5,171 | 682 | ||
| CED Alamo 7, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | 60,560 | $-3,208$ | ||
| CED Amherst Solar, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | - | - | ||
| CED Atwell Island West, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | $-69,684$ | $-987$ | ||
| CED Aurora County Wind, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | $-44,934$ | $-456$ | ||
| CED Avenal Solar, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | $-77,025$ | $-527$ |
[^0]
[^0]: 1 Profit and loss-pooling agreement.
2 Figures from the Group's consolidated financial statements.
3 Newly founded, financial statements not yet available.
4 Control by virtue of company contract.
5 No control by virtue of company contract.
6 Significant influence via indirect investments.
7 Significant influence by virtue of company contract.
8 No significant influence by virtue of company contract.
| I. Affiliated companies which are included in the consolidated financial statements | Shareholding in \% | Equity | Net income / loss | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Direct | Total | $€^{\prime} 000$ | $€^{\prime} 000$ | ||
| CED Basin Street Solar, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | - | - | ||
| CED Beadle County Wind, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | - | - | ||
| CED Brule County Wind, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | $-42,792$ | $-1,407$ | ||
| CED BTM Development Solar, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | $-106$ | $-4,957$ | ||
| CED Burt County Wind, LLC, Lincoln/USA | 100 | - | - | ||
| CED Cal Flots EPC, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | - | - | ||
| CED California Assets Holdings 1, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | - | - | ||
| CED California Battery Storage, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | - | - | ||
| CED California Holdings 2, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | 270,210 | 4,425 | ||
| CED California Holdings 3, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | 304,817 | 4,258 | ||
| CED California Holdings 4, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | 1,329,886 | 13,382 | ||
| CED California Holdings Financing III, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | - | - | ||
| CED California Holdings Financing II, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | - | - | ||
| CED California Holdings Financing I, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | - | - | ||
| CED California Holdings Financing IV, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | - | - | ||
| CED California Holdings, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | $-199,364$ | 10,747 | ||
| CED California Texas Assets Holdings, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | - | - | ||
| CED California Texas Financing Holdings, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | 410,503 | 4,532 | ||
| CED Centerville Wind, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | $-26,786$ | $-804$ | ||
| CED Champaign Solar, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | $-2,290$ | $-131$ | ||
| CED Chicopee Solar, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | 725 | $-358$ | ||
| CED Copper Mountain Solar 1 Holdings, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | - | - | ||
| CED Copper Mountain Solar 2 Holdings, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | - | - | ||
| CED Copper Mountain Solar 3 Holdings, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | - | - | ||
| CED Corcoran Solar 2, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | $-65,609$ | $-1,064$ | ||
| CED Corcoran Solar 3, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | $-69,462$ | $-494$ |
[^0]
[^0]: 1 Profit and loss-pooling agreement.
2 Figures from the Group's consolidated financial statements.
3 Newly founded, Financial statements not yet available.
4 Control by virtue of company contract.
5 No control by virtue of company contract.
6 Significant influence via indirect investments.
7 Significant influence by virtue of company contract.
8 No significant influence by virtue of company contract.
| I. Affiliated companies which are included in the consolidated financial statements | Shareholding in \% | Equity | Net income / loss | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Direct | Total | $€^{\prime} 000$ | $€^{\prime} 000$ | ||
| CED Corcoran Solar, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | $-1,652$ | $-1,458$ | ||
| CED Crane Solar 2, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | - | - | ||
| CED Davison County Wind, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | - | - | ||
| CED Denmark Solar, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | - | - | ||
| CED Development, Inc., Albany/USA | 100 | - | - | ||
| CED Dona Ana County, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | - | - | ||
| CED Donaldson Wind, LLC, Roseville/USA | 100 | - | - | ||
| CED Ducor Solar 1, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | $-66,682$ | $-717$ | ||
| CED Ducor Solar 2, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | $-77,028$ | $-710$ | ||
| CED Ducor Solar 3, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | $-52,990$ | $-534$ | ||
| CED Ducor Solar 4, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | $-69,405$ | $-729$ | ||
| CED Foster Solar, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | $-3,016$ | $-269$ | ||
| CED II California Solar Holdings, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | - | - | ||
| CED Lost Hills OpCo, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | - | - | ||
| CED Lost Hills Solar, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | $-66,136$ | $-1,596$ | ||
| CED Manchester Wind, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | $-26,497$ | $-925$ | ||
| CED Mason City Wind, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | $-21,957$ | $-414$ | ||
| CED McCook County Wind, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | - | - | ||
| CED Mesquite Solar 1 Holdings, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | - | - | ||
| CED Nevada Virginia Asset Holdings, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | - | - | ||
| CED Nevada Virginia Construction Borrower, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | - | - | ||
| CED Nevada Virginia Equity Holdings, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | - | - | ||
| CED Nevada Virginia Financing Holdings, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | 374,219 | 15,254 | ||
| CED Nevada Virginia Pledgor, Inc.,Albany/USA | 100 | - | - | ||
| CED Nevada Virginia Portfolio Holdings, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | 69,902 | $-35,629$ | ||
| CED Northampton Solar, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | $-25,131$ | $-579$ |
[^0]
[^0]: 1 Profit and loss-pooling agreement.
2 Figures from the Group's consolidated financial statements.
3 Newly founded, financial statements not yet available.
4 Control by virtue of company contract.
5 No control by virtue of company contract.
6 Significant influence via indirect investments.
7 Significant influence by virtue of company contract.
8 No significant influence by virtue of company contract.


| I. Affiliated companies which are included in the consolidated financial statements | Shareholding in \% | Equity | Net income / loss | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Direct | Total | $€^{\prime} 000$ | $€^{\prime} 000$ | ||
| CES Hawthorne Solar, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | - | - | ||
| CES Hogonsburg Solar, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | $-2,870$ | $-60$ | ||
| CES Kerman Solar, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | $-2,346$ | $-31$ | ||
| CES Morbletown Solar, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | $-6,566$ | $-792$ | ||
| CES Massachusetts Solar, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | 1,744 | $-35$ | ||
| CES Montville Solar, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | $-2,097$ | $-74$ | ||
| CES Moore Solar, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | $-230$ | 3 | ||
| CES Mount Pleasant Solar, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | $-7,135$ | $-64$ | ||
| CES NBHS Solar, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | 1,411 | $-92$ | ||
| CES Newark Solar, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | 5 | $-47$ | ||
| CES NYC Solar, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | 3 | $-243$ | ||
| CES Philly TA Solar, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | $-5,201$ | $-62$ | ||
| CES Rocklin Solar, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | 336 | $-115$ | ||
| CES Sol Fund 1, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | $-21,179$ | $-621$ | ||
| CES Spackenkill Solar, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | $-991$ | 14 | ||
| CES Stepinac Solar, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | $-541$ | $-12$ | ||
| CES Tihonet Solar, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | 4,304 | $-232$ | ||
| CES VMT Solar, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | $-1,667$ | $-102$ | ||
| Champion WF Holdco, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | 49,791 | - | ||
| Champion Wind Farm, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | 10,329 | $-17,158$ | ||
| Charleston NY 1, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | - | - | ||
| Cheshire MA 2, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | - | - | ||
| Churchill Storage Solutions, LLC, Richmond/USA | 100 | - | - | ||
| Cloghaneleskirt Energy Supply Limited, Kilkenny/Ireland | 100 | 5,058 | 496 | ||
| Clymer Solar LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | - | - | ||
| CMMS Equity Holdings, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | 112,318 | $-1,628$ |
[^0]
[^0]: 1 Profit and loss-pooling agreement.
2 Figures from the Group's consolidated financial statements.
3 Newly founded, Financial statements not yet available.
4 Control by virtue of company contract.
5 No control by virtue of company contract.
6 Significant influence via indirect investments.
7 Significant influence by virtue of company contract.
8 No significant influence by virtue of company contract.
| I. Affiliated companies which are included in the consolidated financial statements | Shareholding in \% | Equity | Net income / loss | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Direct | Total | $€^{\prime} 000$ | $€^{\prime} 000$ | ||
| CMMS Solar Portfolio Holdings, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | 25,331 | 5,634 | ||
| Colbeck's Corner Holdco, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | 82,127 | $-70$ | ||
| Colbeck's Corner, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | 74,660 | $-26,227$ | ||
| Competitive Shared Services, Inc., Albany/USA | 100 | - | - | ||
| Conrad Solar Inc., Vancouver/Canada | 100 | 4,238 | $-19,513$ | ||
| Copper Mountain Solar 1, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | $-98,887$ | $-2,764$ | ||
| Copper Mountain Solar 2 Holdings, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | - | - | ||
| Copper Mountain Solar 2, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | $-431,773$ | $-19,629$ | ||
| Copper Mountain Solar 3 Holdings, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | - | - | ||
| Copper Mountain Solar 3, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | $-327,409$ | $-14,361$ | ||
| Copper Mountain Solar 4, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | $-341,620$ | $-6,771$ | ||
| Copper Mountain Solar 5, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | $-592,953$ | $-4,025$ | ||
| Cormano Sp. z o.o., Warsaw/Poland | 100 | $-5,538$ | $-11,150$ | ||
| County Run, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | $-7,764$ | $-7,464$ | ||
| Crowned Heron 2, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | $-2,127$ | $-2,044$ | ||
| Crowned Heron, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | $-1,991$ | 102 | ||
| Curns Energy Limited, Kilkenny/Ireland | 70 | $-1,360$ | $-17$ | ||
| Custom Energy Services, LLC, Topeka/USA | 100 | - | - | ||
| Danta de Energías, S.A., Soria/Spoin | 99 | 25,935 | 8,641 | ||
| Dartmouth Business Park Solar, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | 1,204 | $-200$ | ||
| Dartmouth II Solar, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | 5,938 | $-376$ | ||
| Delmar DEB, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | - | - | ||
| Delmar DEC, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | - | - | ||
| Delmar DED, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | - | - | ||
| DOTTO MORCONE S.r.l., Rome/Italy | 100 | 27,406 | 14,231 | ||
| Douglas Solar, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | 8,822 | $-109$ |
[^0]
[^0]: 1 Profit and loss-pooling agreement.
2 Figures from the Group's consolidated financial statements.
3 Newly founded, Financial statements not yet available.
4 Control by virtue of company contract.
5 No control by virtue of company contract.
6 Significant influence vio indirect investments.
7 Significant influence by virtue of company contract.
8 No significant influence by virtue of company contract.
| I. Affiliated companies which are included in the consolidated financial statements | Shareholding in \% | Equity | Net income / loss | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Direct | Total | $€^{\prime} 000$ | $€^{\prime} 000$ | ||
| Dromadda Beg Wind Farm Limited, Kilkenny/Ireland | 100 | 4,005 | 452 | ||
| Edgware Energy Limited, Swindon/United Kingdom | 100 | 754 | 36 | ||
| EJ Terry Solar 1, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | $-1,323$ | $-204$ | ||
| Eko-En 1 Sp. z o.o., Warsaw/Poland | 100 | 1,752 | $-448$ | ||
| Eko-En 2 Sp. z o.o., Warsaw/Poland | 100 | 393 | $-9$ | ||
| Eko-En 3 Sp. z o.o., Warsaw/Poland | 100 | 85 | 122 | ||
| Eko-En 4 Sp. z o.o., Warsaw/Poland | 100 | 102 | $-103$ | ||
| El Algodon Alto Wind Farm, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | 333,826 | 12,466 | ||
| Elevate Holdco Funding, Wilmington/USA | 100 | 106,357 | $-4,061$ | ||
| Elevate Wind Holdco, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | 110,922 | 110 | ||
| Elm Spring Solar 1, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | - | - | ||
| Energy Resources Holding B.V., Geertruidenberg/Netherlands | 100 | 123,996 | 56,191 | ||
| Energy Resources Ventures B.V., Geertruidenberg/Netherlands | 100 | 4,951 | $-1,256$ | ||
| Eoliennes de la Grande Bleue SAS, Clichy/France | 100 | 36 | $-1$ | ||
| Etna ME 1, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | - | - | ||
| Etna ME 2, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | - | - | ||
| Explotaciones Eólicas de Aldehuelas, S.L., Soria/Spain | 95 | 13,143 | 3,673 | ||
| Extension Du Porc Eolien Des Nouvions SAS, Clichy/France | 100 | $-15$ | $-36$ | ||
| Extension Du Porc Eolien Du Douiche SAS, Clichy/France | 100 | $-333$ | $-280$ | ||
| Fairhaven MA 2, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | $-11,573$ | $-165$ | ||
| Fairhaven MA 4, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | - | - | ||
| Farma Wiatrowa Borzowice Sp. z o.o., Warsaw/Poland | 100 | 29,046 | 516 | ||
| Farma Wiatrowa Rozdrazew sp. z o.o., Warsaw/Poland | 100 | 232 | 640 | ||
| Fifth Standard Solar PV, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | 380,113 | 26,091 | ||
| Fishersville VAA, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | - | - | ||
| Flemington Solar, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | 10,823 | $-1,480$ |
[^0]
[^0]: 1 Profit and loss-pooling agreement.
2 Figures from the Group's consolidated financial statements.
3 Newly founded, Financial statements not yet available.
4 Control by virtue of company contract.
5 No control by virtue of company contract.
6 Significant influence via indirect investments.
7 Significant influence by virtue of company contract.
8 No significant influence by virtue of company contract.
| I. Affiliated companies which are included in the consolidated financial statements | Shareholding in \% | Equity | Net income / loss | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Direct | Total | $€^{\prime} 000$ | $€^{\prime} 000$ | ||
| Forest Creek Investco, Inc., Wilmington/USA | 100 | 119 | $-4$ | ||
| Forest Creek WF Holdco, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | $-1,257$ | - | ||
| Forest Creek Wind Farm, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | 7,898 | $-3,233$ | ||
| Frankford DEB, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | - | - | ||
| Freetown MA 2, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | - | - | ||
| Frenchtown III Solar, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | 5,143 | $-1,958$ | ||
| Frenchtown II Solar, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | 2,606 | $-573$ | ||
| Frenchtown I Solar, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | 3,015 | $-636$ | ||
| Future Generation Wind, LLC, Boston/USA | 100 | $-25,488$ | $-375$ | ||
| Garwind, LLC, Roseville/USA | 100 | - | - | ||
| Gazules I Fotovoltaica, S.L., Barcelona/Spain | 100 | 356 | $-962$ | ||
| Gazules II Solar, S.L., Barcelona/Spain | 100 | $-14$ | $-817$ | ||
| GBV ZweiunddreiBigste Gesellschaft für Beteiligungsverwaltung mbH, Essen | 100 | 100 | 17,585,771 | -1 | |
| Generación Fotovoltaica Castellana Manchega, S.L., Murcia/Spain | 100 | 5,413 | 5,329 | ||
| Generación Fotovoltaica De Alarcos, S.L.U., Barcelona/Spain | 100 | 1,101 | 890 | ||
| Generación Fotovoltaica Puerta del Sol, S.L.U., Murcia/Spain | 100 | 978 | 239 | ||
| GfV Gesellschaft für Vermögensverwaltung mbH, Dortmund | 100 | 100 | 119,008 | 5,506 | |
| GLC-(MA) Assumption College, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | 2,891 | 126 | ||
| GLC-(MA) Taunton, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | 4,658 | $-116$ | ||
| Goose Farm, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | - | - | ||
| Grondview Holdco, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | 93,314 | $-570$ | ||
| Great Valley Equity Holdings, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | 58,817 | $-7,776$ | ||
| Great Valley Solar 1, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | $-242,382$ | $-5,205$ | ||
| Great Valley Solar 2, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | $-156,037$ | $-3,333$ | ||
| Great Valley Solar 3, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | $-75,421$ | $-1,650$ | ||
| Great Valley Solar 4, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | $-78,089$ | $-1,530$ |
[^0]
[^0]: 1 Profit and loss-pooling agreement.
2 Figures from the Group's consolidated financial statements.
3 Newly founded, Financial statements not yet available.
4 Control by virtue of company contract.
5 No control by virtue of company contract.
6 Significant influence via indirect investments.
7 Significant influence by virtue of company contract.
8 No significant influence by virtue of company contract.
| I. Affiliated companies which are included in the consolidated financial statements | Shareholding in \% | Equity | Net income / loss | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Direct | Total | $€^{\prime} 000$ | $€^{\prime} 000$ | ||
| Great Valley Solar Portfolio Holdings, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | $-65,659$ | 10,478 | ||
| Green Gecco GmbH \& Co. KG, Essen | 51 | 58,799 | 7,074 | ||
| Grid-Way 1 SAS, Clichy/France | 100 | $-18$ | $-17$ | ||
| Grovelond Solor, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | 8,054 | $-169$ | ||
| Groves Solor, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | - | - | ||
| Hollowell A, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | - | - | ||
| Hampden MA 1, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | - | - | ||
| Hardin Class B Holdings LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | 155,290 | $-548$ | ||
| Hardin Wind Holdings LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | 137,445 | $-738$ | ||
| Hardin Wind LLC, Chicago/USA | 100 | 239,764 | $-3,745$ | ||
| Harrisonburg Solor, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | - | - | ||
| Harwich MA 1, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | - | - | ||
| Hickory Park Class B, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | 203,465 | $-295$ | ||
| Hickory Park Holdco, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | 202,356 | 709 | ||
| Hickory Park Solor, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | 241,104 | 25,677 | ||
| Honey Mesquite Wind Farm, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | $-3,851$ | $-3,702$ | ||
| Inadole Wind Farm, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | 40,509 | $-2,053$ | ||
| JBM Solor Projects 10 Ltd., Swindon/United Kingdom | 100 | $-43$ | $-9$ | ||
| JBM Solor Projects 11 Ltd., Swindon/United Kingdom | 100 | $-37$ | $-11$ | ||
| JBM Solor Projects 12 Ltd., Swindon/United Kingdom | 100 | $-33$ | $-9$ | ||
| JBM Solor Projects 13 Ltd., Swindon/United Kingdom | 100 | $-31$ | $-6$ | ||
| JBM Solor Projects 14 Ltd., Swindon/United Kingdom | 100 | $-33$ | $-7$ | ||
| JBM Solor Projects 15 Ltd., Swindon/United Kingdom | 100 | $-28$ | $-6$ | ||
| JBM Solor Projects 17 Ltd., Swindon/United Kingdom | 100 | $-59$ | $-35$ | ||
| JBM Solor Projects 19 Ltd., Swindon/United Kingdom | 100 | $-31$ | $-7$ | ||
| JBM Solor Projects 20 Ltd., Swindon/United Kingdom | 100 | $-49$ | $-14$ |
[^0]
[^0]: 1 Profit and loss-pooling agreement.
2 Figures from the Group's consolidated financial statements.
3 Newly founded, financial statements not yet available.
4 Control by virtue of company contract.
5 No control by virtue of company contract.
6 Significant influence vio indirect investments.
7 Significant influence by virtue of company contract.
8 No significant influence by virtue of company contract.
| I. Affiliated companies which are included in the consolidated financial statements | Shareholding in \% | Equity | Net income / loss | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Direct | Total | $€^{\prime} 000$ | $€^{\prime} 000$ | ||
| JBM Solor Projects 21 Ltd., Swindon/United Kingdom | 100 | $-37$ | $-11$ | ||
| JBM Solor Projects 22 Ltd., Swindon/United Kingdom | 100 | $-26$ | $-6$ | ||
| JBM Solor Projects 24 Ltd., Swindon/United Kingdom | 100 | $-71$ | $-46$ | ||
| JBM Solor Projects 25 Ltd., Swindon/United Kingdom | 100 | $-80$ | $-52$ | ||
| JBM Solor Projects 26 Ltd., Swindon/United Kingdom | 100 | $-58$ | $-22$ | ||
| JBM Solor Projects 27 Ltd., Swindon/United Kingdom | 100 | $-31$ | $-7$ | ||
| JBM Solor Projects 28 Ltd., Swindon/United Kingdom | 100 | $-21$ | $-6$ | ||
| JBM Solor Projects 29 Ltd., Swindon/United Kingdom | 100 | $-52$ | $-30$ | ||
| JBM Solor Projects 2 Ltd., Swindon/United Kingdom | 100 | $-117$ | $-86$ | ||
| JBM Solor Projects 30 Ltd., Swindon/United Kingdom | 100 | $-40$ | $-23$ | ||
| JBM Solor Projects 31 Ltd., Swindon/United Kingdom | 100 | $-24$ | $-9$ | ||
| JBM Solor Projects 32 Ltd., Swindon/United Kingdom | 100 | $-35$ | $-19$ | ||
| JBM Solor Projects 33 Ltd., Swindon/United Kingdom | 100 | $-25$ | $-9$ | ||
| JBM Solor Projects 34 Ltd., Swindon/United Kingdom | 100 | $-23$ | $-9$ | ||
| JBM Solor Projects 35 Ltd., Swindon/United Kingdom | 100 | $-13$ | $-5$ | ||
| JBM Solor Projects 36 Ltd., Swindon/United Kingdom | 100 | $-13$ | $-6$ | ||
| JBM Solor Projects 37 Ltd., Swindon/United Kingdom | 100 | $-21$ | $-13$ | ||
| JBM Solor Projects 39 Ltd., Swindon/United Kingdom | 100 | $-12$ | $-6$ | ||
| JBM Solor Projects 3 Ltd., Swindon/United Kingdom | 100 | $-57$ | $-27$ | ||
| JBM Solor Projects 40 Ltd., Swindon/United Kingdom | 100 | $-11$ | $-5$ | ||
| JBM Solor Projects 41 Ltd., Swindon/United Kingdom | 100 | $-10$ | $-5$ | ||
| JBM Solor Projects 5 Ltd., Swindon/United Kingdom | 100 | $-38$ | $-8$ | ||
| JBM Solor Projects 6 Ltd., Swindon/United Kingdom | 100 | $-124$ | $-94$ | ||
| JBM Solor Projects 7 Ltd., Swindon/United Kingdom | 100 | $-55$ | $-23$ | ||
| JBM Solor Projects 8 Ltd., Swindon/United Kingdom | 100 | $-40$ | $-11$ | ||
| Juhl Energy Services, Inc., Roseville/USA | 100 | 1,810 | $-192$ |
[^0]
[^0]: 1 Profit and loss-pooling agreement
2 Figures from the Group's consolidated financial statements.
3 Newly founded, financial statements not yet available.
4 Control by virtue of company contract.
5 No control by virtue of company contract.
6 Significant influence vio indirect investments.
7 Significant influence by virtue of company contract.
8 No significant influence by virtue of company contract.
| I. Affiliated companies which are included in the consolidated financial statements | Shareholding in \% | Equity | Net income / loss | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Direct | Total | $€^{\prime} 000$ | $€^{\prime} 000$ | ||
| Kenbridge VAB, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | - | - | ||
| Kent Offshore Wind Holding Pty. Ltd., Melbourne/Australia | 100 | - | - | ||
| Kent Offshore Wind Pty. Ltd., Melbourne/Australia | 100 | - | - | ||
| Kish Offshore Wind Limited, Kilkenny/Ireland | $50^{2}$ | $-298$ | $-113$ | ||
| K \& K Wind Enterprises, LLC, Roseville/USA | 100 | - | - | ||
| KMO Kernbrennstoff-Management Gesellschaft mit beschränkter Hoftung, Essen | 100 | 696,225 | -1 | ||
| Knabs Ridge Wind Farm Limited, Swindon/United Kingdom | 100 | 24,467 | 5,196 | ||
| KW Solar IV Sp. z o.o., Warsaw/Poland | 100 | $-89$ | $-78$ | ||
| L100 Sp. z o.o., Warsaw/Poland | 100 | $-35$ | $-22$ | ||
| L120 Sp. z o.o., Warsaw/Poland | 100 | $-4$ | $-2$ | ||
| L130 Sp. z o.o., Warsaw/Poland | 100 | $-4$ | $-2$ | ||
| L140 Sp. z o.o., Warsaw/Poland | 100 | $-5$ | $-2$ | ||
| L30 Sp. z o.o., Warsaw/Poland | 100 | $-79$ | $-57$ | ||
| L40 Sp. z o.o., Warsaw/Poland | 100 | $-6$ | $-3$ | ||
| L70 Sp. z o.o., Warsaw/Poland | 100 | $-26$ | $-22$ | ||
| L80 Sp. z o.o., Warsaw/Poland | 100 | $-18$ | $-15$ | ||
| L90 Sp. z o.o., Warsaw/Poland | 100 | $-4$ | $-2$ | ||
| Lofitte Solar, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | $-6,739$ | $-6,478$ | ||
| Lakehurst Solar, L.L.C., Wilmington/USA | 100 | $-24,556$ | $-2,915$ | ||
| Lane City Wind LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | $-15,619$ | $-15,013$ | ||
| Los Vaguadas I Fotovoltaica S.L., Barcelona/Spain | 100 | $-1,790$ | $-174$ | ||
| Lebanon Solar, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | 2,016 | $-455$ | ||
| Limondale Battery Holding Pty. Ltd., Melbourne/Australia | 100 | $-18$ | $-19$ | ||
| Limondale Battery Pty. Ltd., Melbourne/Australia | 100 | $-4$ | $-4$ | ||
| Limondale Sun Farm Pty. Ltd., Melbourne/Australia | 100 | 148,194 | 11,547 | ||
| Little Cheyne Court Wind Farm Limited, Swindon/United Kingdom | 59 | 20,145 | 12,558 |
[^0]
[^0]: 1 Profit and loss-pooling agreement.
2 Figures from the Group's consolidated financial statements.
3 Newly founded, Financial statements not yet available.
4 Control by virtue of company contract.
5 No control by virtue of company contract.
6 Significant influence via indirect investments.
7 Significant influence by virtue of company contract.
8 No significant influence by virtue of company contract.
| I. Affiliated companies which are included in the consolidated financial statements | Shareholding in \% | Equity | Net income / loss | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Direct | Total | $€^{\prime} 000$ | $€^{\prime} 000$ | ||
| Lordsburg NMA, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | - | - | ||
| Loving NMA, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | - | - | ||
| Loving NMB, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | - | - | ||
| Matooca VAA, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | - | - | ||
| Matooca VAC, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | - | - | ||
| Merrimoc Solar, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | 2,688 | $-243$ | ||
| Mesquite Solar 1 Holdings, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | - | - | ||
| Mesquite Solar 1, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | $-559,191$ | $-20,697$ | ||
| Mesquite Solar 2, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | $-297,637$ | $-4,846$ | ||
| Mesquite Solar 3, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | $-443,819$ | $-9,410$ | ||
| Mesquite Solar 4, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | $-86,147$ | $-2,769$ | ||
| Mesquite Solar 5, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | $-203,127$ | $-13,517$ | ||
| Mifflin Solar LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | - | - | ||
| ML Wind LLP, Swindon/United Kingdom | 51 | 52,214 | 12,599 | ||
| Montgomery Ranch Wind Farm, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | 200,504 | $-63,711$ | ||
| Munnsville Investco, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | 20,171 | $-265$ | ||
| Munnsville WF Holdco, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | 14,551 | - | ||
| Munnsville Wind Farm, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | 19,494 | $-200$ | ||
| Murray Hill Solar, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | 4,424 | $-345$ | ||
| NB HoldCo Limited, Swindon/United Kingdom | 100 | 32,527 | $-13$ | ||
| NB TopCo Limited, Swindon/United Kingdom | 100 | 32,527 | $-53$ | ||
| Neulsaem Ui Offshore Wind Power Co., Ltd., Aphae-eup/South Korea | 90 | 17,904 | $-462$ | ||
| Nordseocluster A GmbH, Hamburg | 100 | 8,906 | $-1,233$ | ||
| Nordseocluster B GmbH, Hamburg | 100 | 25,975 | $-3,325$ | ||
| Nordsee Windpark Beteiligungs GmbH, Essen | 100 | 15,318 | $-1$ | ||
| Norfolk Boreas Limited, Swindon/United Kingdom | 100 | $-142,344$ | $-162,557$ |
[^0]
[^0]: 1 Profit and loss-pooling agreement.
2 Figures from the Group's consolidated financial statements.
3 Newly founded, Financial statements not yet available.
4 Control by virtue of company contract.
5 No control by virtue of company contract.
6 Significant influence via indirect investments.
7 Significant influence by virtue of company contract.
8 No significant influence by virtue of company contract.
| I. Affiliated companies which are included in the consolidated financial statements | Shareholding in \% | Equity | Net income / loss | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Direct | Total | $€^{\prime} 000$ | $€^{\prime} 000$ | ||
| Norfolk Vanguard East Limited, Swindon/United Kingdom | 100 | 56,689 | 44 | ||
| Norfolk Vanguard West Limited, Swindon/United Kingdom | 100 | 8,476 | $-2,503$ | ||
| Northbridge Solor, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | 5,737 | $-159$ | ||
| Northern Orchard Solar PV, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | $-93,960$ | $-80,331$ | ||
| NVE HoldCo Limited, Swindon/United Kingdom | 100 | 56,649 | $-15$ | ||
| NVE TopCo Limited, Swindon/United Kingdom | 100 | 56,627 | $-17$ | ||
| NVW HoldCo Limited, Swindon/United Kingdom | 100 | 48,808 | $-15$ | ||
| NVW TopCo Limited, Swindon/United Kingdom | 100 | 48,808 | $-15$ | ||
| Oak Tree Energy LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | $-22,897$ | $-1,142$ | ||
| OCI Alamo 4, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | $-19,929$ | $-278$ | ||
| OCI Solor San Antonio 4, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | - | - | ||
| Orange CEC MA 1, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | - | - | ||
| Orange VAA, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | - | - | ||
| Orcoien Energy Orcoien, S.L.U., Barcelona/Spain | 100 | $-180$ | $-216$ | ||
| Ponoche Valley Solor, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | $-933,111$ | $-11,320$ | ||
| Panther Creek Holdco, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | 217,260 | - | ||
| Panther Creek Three Class B, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | 233,808 | - | ||
| Panther Creek Three Holdco, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | 233,808 | - | ||
| Panther Creek Wind Farm I\&II, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | 114,243 | 7,994 | ||
| Panther Creek Wind Farm Three, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | 99,197 | 4,611 | ||
| Popolote Creek II WF, Wilmington/USA | 100 | 13,037 | $-11,012$ | ||
| Popolote CreekI WF, Wilmington/USA | 100 | 56,714 | $-4,583$ | ||
| Parc Eolien De Beg Ar C'hra SAS, Clichy/France | 100 | $-138$ | $-158$ | ||
| Parc Eolien De Catillon-Fumechon SAS, Clichy/France | 100 | $-379$ | $-336$ | ||
| Parc Eolien De La Brie Nangissienne SAS, Clichy/France | 100 | $-185$ | $-201$ | ||
| Parc Eolien de la Loutre Noire SAS, Clichy/France | 100 | $-59$ | $-70$ |
[^0]
[^0]: 1 Profit and loss-pooling agreement.
2 Figures from the Group's consolidated financial statements.
3 Newly founded, financial statements not yet available.
4 Control by virtue of company contract.
5 No control by virtue of company contract.
6 Significant influence via indirect investments.
7 Significant influence by virtue of company contract.
8 No significant influence by virtue of company contract.
| I. Affiliated companies which are included in the consolidated financial statements | Shareholding in \% | Equity | Net income / loss | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Direct | Total | $€^{\prime} 000$ | $€^{\prime} 000$ | ||
| Parc Eolien De La Ploine De Beaulieu SAS, Clichy/France | 100 | $-3$ | $-33$ | ||
| Parc Eolien De La Voie Corette SAS, Clichy/France | 100 | $-257$ | $-108$ | ||
| Parc Eolien De Luçay-Le-Libre Et De Giroux SAS, Clichy/France | 100 | $-76$ | $-86$ | ||
| Parc Eolien De Mirebalois SAS, Clichy/France | 100 | $-573$ | $-499$ | ||
| Parc Eolien Des Grands Lazards SAS, Clichy/France | 100 | $-157$ | $-177$ | ||
| Parc Eolien D'Ormesnil SAS, Clichy/France | 100 | $-31$ | $-59$ | ||
| Parc Eolien Du Balinot SAS, Clichy/France | 100 | $-240$ | $-209$ | ||
| Parc Eolien Du Bon Saint-Jean SAS, Clichy/France | 100 | - | $-18$ | ||
| Parc Eolien Du Catesis SAS, Clichy/France | 100 | $-605$ | $-459$ | ||
| Parc Eolien Du Chemin De Châlons SAS, Clichy/France | 100 | $-844$ | $-827$ | ||
| Parc Eolien Du Chemin De Saint-Gilles SAS, Clichy/France | 100 | $-262$ | $-202$ | ||
| Parc Eolien Du Moulin Du Bocage SAS, Clichy/France | 100 | $-25$ | $-35$ | ||
| Parc Eolien Les Pierrots SAS, Clichy/France | 60 | 4,809 | 1,219 | ||
| Parc Solaire des Pierrières SAS, Clichy/France | 100 | 26 | $-6$ | ||
| Park Wiotrowy Dolice Sp. z o.o., Warsaw/Poland | 100 | 1,447 | $-6$ | ||
| Park Wiotrowy Gaworzyce Sp. z o.o., Warsaw/Poland | 100 | 3,976 | 821 | ||
| PA Solor Park II, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | $-21,382$ | 19 | ||
| PA Solor Park, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | $-22,706$ | 356 | ||
| Peyton Creek Holdco, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | $-9,267$ | 4,250 | ||
| Peyton Creek Wind Farm II, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | $-16,263$ | $-9,790$ | ||
| Peyton Creek Wind Farm, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | 50,982 | $-597$ | ||
| Plecki Sp. z o.o., Warsaw/Poland | 51 | 20,072 | 2,276 | ||
| Pilesgrove Solor, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | 6,185 | $-4,532$ | ||
| Pioneer Trail Wind Farm, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 95 | 74,191 | 5,516 | ||
| Pittstown NY 1, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | - | - | ||
| Pleasant Hill BESS, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | - | - |
[^0]
[^0]: 1 Profit and loss-pooling agreement.
2 Figures from the Group's consolidated financial statements.
3 Newly founded, Financial statements not yet available.
4 Control by virtue of company contract.
5 No control by virtue of company contract.
6 Significant influence via indirect investments.
7 Significant influence by virtue of company contract.
8 No significant influence by virtue of company contract.
| I. Affiliated companies which are included in the consolidated financial statements | Shareholding in \% | Equity | Net income / loss | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Direct | Total | $€^{\prime} 000$ | $€^{\prime} 000$ | ||
| Pleasant Hill Solar, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | $-39,402$ | $-160$ | ||
| Prairie Creek Wind, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | $-1$ | $-1$ | ||
| Primus Projekt GmbH \& Co. KG, Hanover | 100 | - | $-251$ | ||
| Project Greenwich NY 1, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | - | - | ||
| PV 1000 Sp. z o.o., Warsaw/Poland | 100 | $-17$ | $-12$ | ||
| PV 1010 Sp. z o.o., Warsaw/Poland | 100 | $-20$ | $-6$ | ||
| PV 1020 Sp. z o.o., Warsaw/Poland | 100 | $-8$ | $-3$ | ||
| PV 1040 Sp. z o.o., Warsaw/Poland | 100 | $-10$ | $-3$ | ||
| PV 1050 Sp. z o.o., Warsaw/Poland | 100 | $-27$ | $-6$ | ||
| PV 1060 Sp. z o.o., Warsaw/Poland | 100 | $-11$ | $-4$ | ||
| PV 1070 Sp. z o.o., Warsaw/Poland | 100 | $-19$ | $-11$ | ||
| PV 1090 Sp. z o.o., Warsaw/Poland | 100 | $-7$ | $-3$ | ||
| PV 1160 Sp. z o.o., Warsaw/Poland | 100 | $-22$ | $-12$ | ||
| PV 1170 Sp. z o.o., Warsaw/Poland | 100 | $-61$ | $-51$ | ||
| PV 1180 Sp. z o.o., Warsaw/Poland | 100 | $-5$ | $-3$ | ||
| PV 1190 Sp. z o.o., Warsaw/Poland | 100 | $-44$ | $-9$ | ||
| PV 1200 Sp. z o.o., Warsaw/Poland | 100 | $-20$ | $-15$ | ||
| PV 1220 Sp. z o.o., Warsaw/Poland | 100 | $-28$ | $-19$ | ||
| PV 1240 Sp. z o.o., Warsaw/Poland | 100 | $-30$ | $-25$ | ||
| PV 1250 Sp. z o.o., Warsaw/Poland | 100 | $-12$ | $-8$ | ||
| PV 1260 Sp. z o.o., Warsaw/Poland | 100 | $-20$ | $-5$ | ||
| PV 1280 Sp. z o.o., Warsaw/Poland | 100 | $-44$ | $-38$ | ||
| PV 1290 Sp. z o.o., Warsaw/Poland | 100 | $-29$ | $-20$ | ||
| PV 1300 Sp. z o.o., Warsaw/Poland | 100 | $-4$ | $-2$ | ||
| PV 1320 Sp. z o.o., Warsaw/Poland | 100 | $-36$ | $-9$ | ||
| PV 1340 Sp. z o.o., Warsaw/Poland | 100 | $-17$ | $-4$ |
[^0]
[^0]: 1 Profit and loss-pooling agreement.
2 Figures from the Group's consolidated financial statements.
3 Newly founded, Financial statements not yet available.
4 Control by virtue of company contract.
5 No control by virtue of company contract.
6 Significant influence vio indirect investments.
7 Significant influence by virtue of company contract.
8 No significant influence by virtue of company contract.
| I. Affiliated companies which are included in the consolidated financial statements | Shareholding in \% | Equity | Net income / loss | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Direct | Total | $€^{\prime} 000$ | $€^{\prime} 000$ | ||
| PV 1360 Sp. z o.o., Warsaw/Poland | 100 | $-94$ | $-84$ | ||
| PV 1380 Sp. z o.o., Warsaw/Poland | 100 | $-21$ | $-4$ | ||
| PV 1390 Sp. z o.o., Warsaw/Poland | 100 | $-36$ | $-29$ | ||
| PV 1400 Sp. z o.o., Warsaw/Poland | 100 | $-5$ | $-2$ | ||
| PV 1420 Sp. z o.o., Warsaw/Poland | 100 | $-28$ | $-5$ | ||
| PV 1430 Sp. z o.o., Warsaw/Poland | 100 | $-16$ | $-4$ | ||
| PV 1440 Sp. z o.o., Warsaw/Poland | 100 | $-138$ | $-108$ | ||
| PV 1450 Sp. z o.o., Warsaw/Poland | 100 | $-5$ | $-2$ | ||
| PV 1470 Sp. z o.o., Warsaw/Poland | 100 | $-13$ | $-6$ | ||
| PV 1480 Sp. z o.o., Warsaw/Poland | 100 | $-5$ | $-2$ | ||
| PV 1490 Sp. z o.o., Warsaw/Poland | 100 | $-17$ | $-14$ | ||
| PV 1530 Sp. z o.o., Warsaw/Poland | 100 | $-15$ | $-12$ | ||
| PV 1540 Sp. z o.o., Warsaw/Poland | 100 | $-16$ | $-10$ | ||
| PV 1550 Sp. z o.o., Warsaw/Poland | 100 | $-28$ | $-4$ | ||
| PV 1570 Sp. z o.o., Warsaw/Poland | 100 | $-28$ | $-12$ | ||
| PV 1590 Sp. z o.o., Warsaw/Poland | 100 | $-7$ | $-4$ | ||
| PV 1600 Sp. z o.o., Warsaw/Poland | 100 | $-8$ | $-3$ | ||
| PV 1620 Sp. z o.o., Warsaw/Poland | 100 | $-11$ | $-3$ | ||
| PV 1640 Sp. z o.o., Warsaw/Poland | 100 | $-13$ | $-9$ | ||
| PV 1650 Sp. z o.o., Warsaw/Poland | 100 | $-14$ | $-3$ | ||
| PV 1660 Sp. z o.o., Warsaw/Poland | 100 | $-14$ | $-4$ | ||
| PV 1670 Sp. z o.o., Warsaw/Poland | 100 | $-21$ | $-16$ | ||
| PV 1680 Sp. z o.o., Warsaw/Poland | 100 | $-7$ | $-3$ | ||
| PV 1690 Sp. z o.o., Warsaw/Poland | 100 | $-37$ | $-23$ | ||
| PV 1700 Sp. z o.o., Warsaw/Poland | 100 | $-10$ | $-4$ | ||
| PV 1710 Sp. z o.o., Warsaw/Poland | 100 | $-14$ | $-10$ |
[^0]
[^0]: 1 Profit and loss-pooling agreement.
2 Figures from the Group's consolidated financial statements.
3 Newly founded, Financial statements not yet available.
4 Control by virtue of company contract.
5 No control by virtue of company contract.
6 Significant influence vio indirect investments.
7 Significant influence by virtue of company contract.
8 No significant influence by virtue of company contract.
| I. Affiliated companies which are included in the consolidated financial statements | Shareholding in \% | Equity | Net income / loss | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Direct | Total | $€^{\prime} 000$ | $€^{\prime} 000$ | ||
| PV 1730 Sp. z o.o., Warsaw/Poland | 100 | $-9$ | $-3$ | ||
| PV 1740 Sp. z o.o., Warsaw/Poland | 100 | $-59$ | $-48$ | ||
| PV 1750 Sp. z o.o., Warsaw/Poland | 100 | $-31$ | $-23$ | ||
| PV 1780 Sp. z o.o., Warsaw/Poland | 100 | $-7$ | $-4$ | ||
| PV 1790 Sp. z o.o., Warsaw/Poland | 100 | $-3$ | $-2$ | ||
| PV 1910 Sp. z o.o., Warsaw/Poland | 100 | $-6$ | $-3$ | ||
| PV 1920 Sp. z o.o., Warsaw/Poland | 100 | $-3$ | $-2$ | ||
| PV 1930 Sp. z o.o., Warsaw/Poland | 100 | $-7$ | $-4$ | ||
| PV 2010 Sp. z o.o., Warsaw/Poland | 100 | $-3$ | $-2$ | ||
| PV 2030 Sp. z o.o., Warsaw/Poland | 100 | $-5$ | $-3$ | ||
| PV 2050 Sp. z o.o., Warsaw/Poland | 100 | $-4$ | $-3$ | ||
| PV 2070 Sp. z o.o., Warsaw/Poland | 100 | $-4$ | $-3$ | ||
| PV 2080 Sp. z o.o., Warsaw/Poland | 100 | $-14$ | $-4$ | ||
| PV 2090 Sp. z o.o., Warsaw/Poland | 100 | $-4$ | $-2$ | ||
| PV 2100 Sp. z o.o., Warsaw/Poland | 100 | $-6$ | $-3$ | ||
| PV 2120 Sp. z o.o., Warsaw/Poland | 100 | $-5$ | $-4$ | ||
| PV 2130 Sp. z o.o., Warsaw/Poland | 100 | $-4$ | $-2$ | ||
| PV 2140 Sp. z o.o., Warsaw/Poland | 100 | $-4$ | $-2$ | ||
| PV 2150 Sp. z o.o., Warsaw/Poland | 100 | $-12$ | $-4$ | ||
| PV 2170 Sp. z o.o., Warsaw/Poland | 100 | $-3$ | $-2$ | ||
| PV 270 Sp. z o.o., Warsaw/Poland | 100 | $-50$ | $-38$ | ||
| PV 290 Sp. z o.o., Warsaw/Poland | 100 | $-13$ | $-6$ | ||
| PV 300 Sp. z o.o., Warsaw/Poland | 100 | $-37$ | $-30$ | ||
| PV 320 Sp. z o.o., Warsaw/Poland | 100 | $-50$ | $-44$ | ||
| PV 330 Sp. z o.o., Warsaw/Poland | 100 | $-15$ | $-9$ | ||
| PV 340 Sp. z o.o., Warsaw/Poland | 100 | $-13$ | $-13$ |
[^0]
[^0]: 1 Profit and loss-pooling agreement.
2 Figures from the Group's consolidated financial statements.
3 Newly founded, Financial statements not yet available.
4 Control by virtue of company contract.
5 No control by virtue of company contract.
6 Significant influence vio indirect investments.
7 Significant influence by virtue of company contract.
8 No significant influence by virtue of company contract.
| I. Affiliated companies which are included in the consolidated financial statements | Shareholding in \% | Equity | Net income / loss | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Direct | Total | $€^{\prime} 000$ | $€^{\prime} 000$ | ||
| PV 360 Sp. z o.o., Warsaw/Poland | 100 | $-10$ | $-3$ | ||
| PV 370 Sp. z o.o., Warsaw/Poland | 100 | $-15$ | $-10$ | ||
| PV 380 Sp. z o.o., Warsaw/Poland | 100 | $-47$ | $-40$ | ||
| PV 400 Sp. z o.o., Warsaw/Poland | 100 | $-28$ | $-21$ | ||
| PV 410 Sp. z o.o., Warsaw/Poland | 100 | $-17$ | $-13$ | ||
| PV 420 Sp. z o.o., Warsaw/Poland | 100 | $-14$ | $-7$ | ||
| PV 430 Sp. z o.o., Warsaw/Poland | 100 | $-93$ | $-26$ | ||
| PV 470 Sp. z o.o., Warsaw/Poland | 100 | $-4$ | - | ||
| PV 500 Sp. z o.o., Warsaw/Poland | 100 | $-8$ | $-3$ | ||
| PV 630 Sp. z o.o., Warsaw/Poland | 100 | $-46$ | $-37$ | ||
| PV 640 Sp. z o.o., Warsaw/Poland | 100 | $-24$ | $-17$ | ||
| PV 660 Sp. z o.o., Warsaw/Poland | 100 | $-14$ | $-11$ | ||
| PV 670 Sp. z o.o., Warsaw/Poland | 100 | $-67$ | $-52$ | ||
| PV 680 Sp. z o.o., Warsaw/Poland | 100 | $-8$ | $-3$ | ||
| PV 700 Sp. z o.o., Warsaw/Poland | 100 | $-36$ | $-28$ | ||
| PV 710 Sp. z o.o., Warsaw/Poland | 100 | $-26$ | $-18$ | ||
| PV 720 Sp. z o.o., Warsaw/Poland | 100 | $-17$ | $-12$ | ||
| PV 730 Sp. z o.o., Warsaw/Poland | 100 | $-12$ | $-5$ | ||
| PV 740 Sp. z o.o., Warsaw/Poland | 100 | $-11$ | $-3$ | ||
| Pyron Wind Farm, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | 280,629 | $-15,430$ | ||
| Quartz Solor, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | 684 | 3,174 | ||
| R3 Renewables II, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 75 | 22,041 | - | ||
| Radford's Run Holdco, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | 58,813 | $-118$ | ||
| Radford's Run Wind Farm, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | 155,706 | 39,512 | ||
| Rampion Offshore Wind Limited, Greenwood/United Kingdom | 50 | 726,435 | 165,124 | ||
| Renewables Solar Holding GmbH, Essen | 100 | 4,993 | $-1,826$ |
[^0]
[^0]: 1 Profit and loss-pooling agreement.
2 Figures from the Group's consolidated financial statements.
3 Newly founded, Financial statements not yet available.
4 Control by virtue of company contract.
5 No control by virtue of company contract.
6 Significant influence vio indirect investments.
7 Significant influence by virtue of company contract.
8 No significant influence by virtue of company contract.
| I. Affiliated companies which are included in the consolidated financial statements | Shareholding in \% | Equity | Net income / loss | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Direct | Total | $€^{\prime} 000$ | $€^{\prime} 000$ | ||
| Rheinbroun Brennstoff GmbH, Frechen | 100 | 82,619 | $-1$ | ||
| Rheinische Baustoffwerke GmbH, Bergheim | 100 | 9,236 | $-1$ | ||
| Rheinkroftwerk Albbruck-Dogern Aktiengesellschaft, Waldshut-Tiengen | 77 | 32,366 | 1,757 | ||
| Rhenas Insurance Limited, St. Julions/Molita | 100 | 100 | 60,888 | 1,813 | |
| Rhyl Flats Wind Farm Limited, Swindon/United Kingdom | 50 | 85,563 | 21,512 | ||
| R Morris Solar LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | - | - | ||
| Roeder Family Wind Farm, LLC, Des Moines/USA | 100 | - | - | ||
| Roscoe WF Holdco, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | 61,971 | - | ||
| Roscoe Wind Farm, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | 31,574 | $-2,847$ | ||
| Rose Creek Wind, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | - | - | ||
| Rose Wind Holdings, LLC, Roseville/USA | 100 | $-6,190$ | $-54$ | ||
| RP Wind, LLC, Upper Arlington/USA | 100 | $-3,648$ | $-203$ | ||
| RV Rheinbroun Handel und Dienstleistungen GmbH, Frechen | 100 | 36,694 | $-1$ | ||
| RWE Aktiengesellschaft, Essen | 13,105,733 | 1,857,176 | |||
| RWE Bottery Solutions GmbH, Essen | 100 | 1,180 | $-1$ | ||
| RWE Canada Ltd., Saint John/Canada | 100 | 11,130 | 2,728 | ||
| RWECE Clean Energy, Inc., Albany/USA | 100 | $-1,549,484$ | 1,013 | ||
| RWE Clean Energy Asset Holdings, Inc., Albany/USA | 100 | 981,652 | 30,073 | ||
| RWE Clean Energy Asset Management, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | 136,154 | 10,935 | ||
| RWE Clean Energy Bottery Storage, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | $-71,452$ | 735 | ||
| RWE Clean Energy DCE Development, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | - | - | ||
| RWE Clean Energy DCE Holdco, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | - | - | ||
| RWE Clean Energy DCE Operations, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | - | - | ||
| RWE Clean Energy Development, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | 1,515,306 | $-3,211$ | ||
| RWE Clean Energy, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | 10,816,977 | - | ||
| RWE Clean Energy O&M, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | 32,030 | $-7,728$ |
[^0]
[^0]: 1 Profit and loss-pooling agreement.
2 Figures from the Group's consolidated financial statements.
3 Newly founded, Financial statements not yet available.
4 Control by virtue of company contract.
5 No control by virtue of company contract.
6 Significant influence vio indirect investments.
7 Significant influence by virtue of company contract.
8 No significant influence by virtue of company contract.
| I. Affiliated companies which are included in the consolidated financial statements | Shareholding in \% | Equity | Net income / loss | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Direct | Total | $€^{\prime} 000$ | $€^{\prime} 000$ | ||
| RWE Clean Energy QSE, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | 225,912 | 1,293 | ||
| RWE Clean Energy Services, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | $-3,752$ | $-232,241$ | ||
| RWE Clean Energy Solutions, Inc., Albany/USA | 100 | 399,941 | $-9,848$ | ||
| RWE Clean Energy Solutions Residential Soler, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | $-11,811$ | $-1,075$ | ||
| RWE Clean Energy Wholesale Services, Inc., Albany/USA | 100 | 151,481 | $-20,346$ | ||
| RWE Eemshaven Holding II B.V., Geertruidenberg/Netherlands | 100 | 599,214 | 803,263 | ||
| RWE Eemshaven Magnum B.V., Eemshaven/Netherlands | 100 | 306,692 | $-118,696$ | ||
| RWE Eemshydrogen B.V., Geertruidenberg/Netherlands | 100 | $-4,730$ | $-1,192$ | ||
| RWE Energie Odnawialne Sp. z o.o., Szczecin/Poland | 100 | 156,618 | 9,853 | ||
| RWE Energy Marketing III, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | $-63$ | 3,648 | ||
| RWE Energy Services, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | 899 | $-14$ | ||
| RWE Eolien en Mer France SAS, Clichy/France | 100 | 6,625 | $-7,903$ | ||
| RWE Evendorf Windparkbetriebsgesellschaft mbH , Hanover | 100 | 25 | $-1$ | ||
| RWE Finance US, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | 2,883 | $-4$ | ||
| RWE Foundation gGmbH, Essen | 100 | 100 | 125,297 | $-1,227$ | |
| RWE Gas Storage West GmbH, Essen | 100 | 350,087 | $-1$ | ||
| RWE Generation Belgium N.V., Hosselt/Belgium | 100 | $-2,517$ | - | ||
| RWE Generation Holding B.V., Geertruidenberg/Netherlands | 100 | $-3,900$ | 4,700 | ||
| RWE Generation Hydro GmbH, Essen | 100 | 25 | $-1$ | ||
| RWE Generation NL B.V., Geertruidenberg/Netherlands | 100 | 604,314 | 748,135 | ||
| RWE Generation NL Personeel B.V., Geertruidenberg/Netherlands | 100 | 5,316 | $-51$ | ||
| RWE Generation SE, Essen | 100 | 100 | 281,269 | $-1$ | |
| RWE Generation UK Holdings Limited, Swindon/United Kingdom | 100 | 4,324,752 | 1,001,182 | ||
| RWE Generation UK plc, Swindon/United Kingdom | 100 | 3,183,540 | 1,051,218 | ||
| RWE Green Gecco Windparks GmbH , Hanover | 100 | 181 | $-1$ | ||
| RWE Hydrogen US, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | $-442$ | $-425$ |
[^0]
[^0]: 1 Profit and loss-pooling agreement.
2 Figures from the Group's consolidated financial statements.
3 Newly founded, Financial statements not yet available.
4 Control by virtue of company contract.
5 No control by virtue of company contract.
6 Significant influence via indirect investments.
7 Significant influence by virtue of company contract.
8 No significant influence by virtue of company contract.
| I. Affiliated companies which are included in the consolidated financial statements | Shareholding in \% | Equity | Net income / loss | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Direct | Total | $€^{\prime} 000$ | $€^{\prime} 000$ | |
| RWE indeland Windpark Eschweiler GmbH \& Co. KG, Eschweiler | 51 | 36,522 | 4,332 | |
| RWE Investco EPC Mgmt.2, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | - | - | - |
| RWE Investco EPC Mgmt, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | 1,063,042 | 168 | |
| RWE Investco Mgmt II, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | 1,385,331 | 106,048 | |
| RWE Investco Mgmt, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | 2,960,345 | 6,268 | |
| RWE Kaskasi GmbH, Hamburg | 100 | 302,099 | $-1$ | |
| RWE Lengerich Windparkbetriebsgesellschaft mbH, Gersten | 100 | 25 | $-1$ | |
| RWE Limondale Sun Farm Holding Pty. Ltd., Melbourne/Australia | 100 | 151,560 | 6,468 | |
| RWE Magicat Holdco, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | 51,063 | 6,034 | |
| RWE Markinch Limited, Swindon/United Kingdom | 100 | 75,413 | 90,634 | |
| RWE Metzler SPF H2O, Frankfurt am Main | 100 | 130,869 | 2,291 | |
| RWE Neuland Erneuerbare Energien GmbH \& Co. KG, Essen | 51 | 34,941 | 133 | |
| RWE Nuclear GmbH, Essen | 100 | 100 | 100,000 | $-1$ |
| RWE Nukleus Green H2 GmbH, Lingen (Ems) | 100 | 201,500 | $-1$ | |
| RWE Offshore Celtic Sea Limited, Swindon/United Kingdom | 100 | - | - | - |
| RWE Offshore Development, LLC, Boston/USA | 100 | $-25,403$ | $-3,793$ | |
| RWE Offshore Neptuni AB, Malmo̊/Sweden | 100 | 71 | $-1$ | |
| RWE Offshore Sódra Victoria AB, Malmo̊/Sweden | 100 | 28 | $-44$ | |
| RWE Offshore Wind GmbH, Essen | 100 | 25 | $-1$ | |
| RWE Offshore Wind Holdings, LLC, Dover/USA | 100 | 986,312 | $-14$ | |
| RWE Offshore Wind Japan Murakami-Tainai K.K., Tokyo/Japan | 100 | 122 | $-46$ | |
| RWE Offshore Wind Netherlands B.V., Geertruidenberg/Netherlands | 100 | $-10,882$ | $-7,997$ | |
| RWE Offshore Wind Netherlands Participations VII B.V., Geertruidenberg/Netherlands | 100 | 105 | 105 | |
| RWE Offshore Wind Netherlands Participations VIII B.V., Geertruidenberg/Netherlands | 100 | 105 | 105 | |
| RWE Offshore Wind Norway 1 AS, Oslo/Norway | 100 | 12 | 8 | |
| RWE Offshore Wind Poland Sp. z o.o., Slupsk/Poland | 100 | 65,221 | $-722$ |
[^0]
[^0]: 1 Profit and loss-pooling agreement.
2 Figures from the Group's consolidated financial statements.
3 Newly founded, financial statements not yet available.
4 Control by virtue of company contract.
5 No control by virtue of company contract.
6 Significant influence via indirect investments.
7 Significant influence by virtue of company contract.
8 No significant influence by virtue of company contract.
| I. Affiliated companies which are included in the consolidated financial statements | Shareholding in \% | Equity | Net income / loss | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Direct | Total | $€^{\prime} 000$ | $€^{\prime} 000$ | ||
| RWE Offshore Wind Services, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | $-17,291$ | $-16,604$ | ||
| RWE Operations France SAS, Clichy/France | 100 | $-1,095$ | $-1,414$ | ||
| RWE Personeel B.V., Geertruidenberg/Netherlands | 100 | 679 | $-6$ | ||
| RWE Power Aktiengesellschaft, Essen | 100 | 100 | 1,988,572 | $-1$ | |
| RWE Renewables Australia Pty. Ltd., Melbourne/Australia | 100 | $-6,511$ | $-11,167$ | ||
| RWE Renewables Benelux B.V., Geertruidenberg/Netherlands | 100 | $-14,404$ | 4,545 | ||
| RWE Renewables Beteiligungs GmbH, Dortmund | 100 | 358,950 | $-1$ | ||
| RWE Renewables Canada Holdings Inc., Vancouver/Canada | 100 | 34,441 | $-861$ | ||
| RWE Renewables Denmark A/S, Copenhagen/Denmark | 100 | 1,629 | $-3,578$ | ||
| RWE Renewables Deutschland GmbH, Berlin | 100 | 25 | $-1$ | ||
| RWE Renewables Distribution Poland Sp. z o.o., Warsaw/Poland | 100 | $-13$ | $-12$ | ||
| RWE Renewables Energy Marketing Australia Pty. Ltd., Melbourne/Australia | 100 | $-7$ | $-18$ | ||
| RWE Renewables Europe \& Australia GmbH, Essen | 100 | 454 | $-1$ | ||
| RWE Renewables GYM 2 Limited, Swindon/United Kingdom | 100 | 36,245 | 9,671 | ||
| RWE Renewables GYM 3 Limited, Swindon/United Kingdom | 100 | 36,243 | 9,681 | ||
| RWE Renewables GYM 4 Limited, Swindon/United Kingdom | 100 | 105,625 | 30,546 | ||
| RWE Renewables Hellas Single Member S.A., Maroussi/Greece | 100 | 617 | $-2,552$ | ||
| RWE Renewables Iberia, S.A.U., Barcelona/Spain | 100 | 150,930 | 38,108 | ||
| RWE Renewables International Participations B.V., Geertruidenberg/Netherlands | 100 | 7,585,800 | 264,900 | ||
| RWE Renewables Ireland East Celtic Limited, Kilkenny/Ireland | 100 | $-69$ | $-35$ | ||
| RWE Renewables Ireland Limited, Kilkenny/Ireland | 100 | $-24,768$ | $-8,635$ | ||
| RWE Renewables Italia S.r.l., Rome/Italy | 100 | 334,776 | 136,314 | ||
| RWE Renewables Japan G.K., Tokyo/Japan | 100 | $-2,405$ | $-16,656$ | ||
| RWE Renewables Korea LLC, Seoul/South Korea | 100 | 9,933 | $-5,768$ | ||
| RWE Renewables Management UK Limited, Swindon/United Kingdom | 100 | 254,464 | 22,331 | ||
| RWE Renewables Norway AS, Oslo/Norway | 100 | 12,352 | $-10,620$ |
[^0]
[^0]: 1 Profit and loss-pooling agreement.
2 Figures from the Group's consolidated financial statements.
3 Newly founded, Financial statements not yet available.
4 Control by virtue of company contract.
5 No control by virtue of company contract.
6 Significant influence via indirect investments.
7 Significant influence by virtue of company contract.
8 No significant influence by virtue of company contract.
| I. Affiliated companies which are included in the consolidated financial statements | Shareholding in \% | Equity | Net income / loss | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Direct | Total | €'000 | €'000 | ||
| RWE Renewables Offshore HoldCo One GmbH, Essen | 100 | 25 | $-1$ | ||
| RWE Renewables Offshore HoldCo Three GmbH, Essen | 100 | 28,490 | $-1$ | ||
| RWE Renewables Operations Australia Pty Ltd, Melbourne/Australia | 100 | 1,708 | 176 | ||
| RWE Renewables Poland Sp. z o.o., Warsaw/Poland | 100 | 720,762 | 67,239 | ||
| RWE Renewables PV Schönau GmbH, Essen | 100 | 173 | $-1$ | ||
| RWE Renewables Sweden AB, Malmo/Sweden | 100 | 135,374 | 68,890 | ||
| RWE Renewables Toiwan Ltd., Taipeh/Toiwan | 100 | 7,031 | $-36,919$ | ||
| RWE Renewables Trident Offshore GmbH, Essen | 100 | 25 | $-1$ | ||
| RWE Renewables UK Blyth Limited, Swindon/United Kingdom | 100 | 164 | $-84$ | ||
| RWE Renewables UK Dogger Bank South (East) Limited, Swindon/United Kingdom | 51 | $-1,024$ | $-26$ | ||
| RWE Renewables UK Dogger Bank South (West) Limited, Swindon/United Kingdom | 51 | $-1,024$ | $-26$ | ||
| RWE Renewables UK Holdings Limited, Swindon/United Kingdom | 100 | 1,845,316 | 154,760 | ||
| RWE Renewables UK Humber Wind Limited, Swindon/United Kingdom | 51 | 501,729 | 82,724 | ||
| RWE Renewables UK Limited, Swindon/United Kingdom | 100 | 1,052,502 | 394,359 | ||
| RWE Renewables UK London Array Limited, Swindon/United Kingdom | 100 | 249,885 | 73,282 | ||
| RWE Renewables UK Onshore Wind Limited, Swindon/United Kingdom | 100 | 138,557 | 24,643 | ||
| RWE Renewables UK Operations Limited, Swindon/United Kingdom | 100 | 27,426 | 4,331 | ||
| RWE Renewables UK Robin Rigg East Limited, Swindon/United Kingdom | 100 | 40,934 | 25,684 | ||
| RWE Renewables UK Robin Rigg West Limited, Swindon/United Kingdom | 100 | 25,127 | 22,105 | ||
| RWE Renewables UK Scroby Sands Limited, Swindon/United Kingdom | 100 | 2,632 | $-3,137$ | ||
| RWE Renewables UK Solar and Storage Limited, Swindon/United Kingdom | 100 | $-3,428$ | $-3,368$ | ||
| RWE Renewables UK Solar Holdings Limited, Swindon/United Kingdom | 100 | $-14,413$ | $-14,143$ | ||
| RWE Renewables UK Swindon Limited, Swindon/United Kingdom | 100 | 2,270,638 | 183,429 | ||
| RWE Renewables UK Wind Services Limited, Swindon/United Kingdom | 100 | 62,509 | 12,155 | ||
| RWE Renouvelables France SAS, Clichy/France | 100 | 46,779 | $-21,384$ | ||
| RWE SERVICE IBERIA, S.L.U., Barcelona/Spain | 100 | 108 | $-1$ | ||
| 1 Profit and loss-pooling agreement. 2 Figures from the Group's consolidated financial statements. 3 Newly founded, Financial statements not yet available. 4 Control by virtue of company contract. |
5 No control by virtue of company contract. 6 Significant influence vio indirect investments. 7 Significant influence by virtue of company contract. 8 No significant influence by virtue of company contract. |
| I. Affiliated companies which are included in the consolidated financial statements | Shareholding in \% | Equity | Net income / loss | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Direct | Total | $€^{\prime} 000$ | $€^{\prime} 000$ | |
| RWE Solar Development, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | 617,879 | $-16,282$ | |
| RWE Solar NC Lessee LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | 6,534 | 1,068 | |
| RWE Solar NC Pledgor LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | 2,743 | - | |
| RWE Solar Netherlands B.V., Geertruidenberg/Netherlands | 100 | 1,141 | $-4$ | |
| RWE Solar Poland Sp. z o.o., Warsaw/Poland | 100 | $-826$ | 84 | |
| RWE Solar PV, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | 85,541 | $-960$ | |
| RWE Sommerland Windparkbetriebsgesellschaft mbH , Sommerland | 100 | 26 | $-1$ | |
| RWEST Middle East Holdings B.V., v-Hertogenbosch/Netherlands | 100 | 6,629 | 743 | |
| RWE Supply and Trading (Shanghai) Co. Ltd, Shanghai/China | 100 | 10,289 | $-1,099$ | |
| RWE Supply \& Trading Americas Holdings, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | 949,362 | - | |
| RWE Supply \& Trading Americas, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | 95,795 | $-9,408$ | |
| RWE Supply \& Trading Asia-Pacific PTE, LTD., Singapore/Singapore | 100 | 149,466 | 62,974 | |
| RWE Supply \& Trading GmbH, Essen | 100 | 100 | 446,778 | $-1$ |
| RWE Supply \& Trading Japan KK, Tokyo/Japan | 100 | 33,498 | 17,204 | |
| RWE Supply \& Trading Participations Limited, London/United Kingdom | 100 | 10,851 | 89,739 | |
| RWE Technology International GmbH, Essen | 100 | 12,463 | $-1$ | |
| RWE Technology NL B.V., Geertruidenberg/Netherlands | 100 | - | - | |
| RWE Technology UK Limited, Swindon/United Kingdom | 100 | 4,948 | 1,052 | |
| RWE THOR 1 B.V., Geertruidenberg/Netherlands | 100 | 44,715 | 122 | |
| RWE THOR 2 B.V., Geertruidenberg/Netherlands | 100 | 21,042 | 57 | |
| RWE THOR 3 B.V., Geertruidenberg/Netherlands | 100 | 10,959 | 30 | |
| RWE THOR 4 B.V., Geertruidenberg/Netherlands | 100 | 10,959 | 30 | |
| RWE Trading Americas Inc., New York City/USA | 100 | 2,984 | $-210$ | |
| RWE Trading Services GmbH, Essen | 100 | 45,735 | $-1$ | |
| RWE \& Turcos Güney Elektrik Üretim A.S., Ankara/Türkiye | 70 | 275,222 | 6,907 | |
| RWE US Holdings, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | 9,551,783 | 219,271 |
[^0]
[^0]: 1 Profit and loss-pooling agreement.
2 Figures from the Group's consolidated financial statements.
3 Newly founded, Financial statements not yet available.
4 Control by virtue of company contract.
5 No control by virtue of company contract.
6 Significant influence via indirect investments.
7 Significant influence by virtue of company contract.
8 No significant influence by virtue of company contract.
| I. Affiliated companies which are included in the consolidated financial statements | Shareholding in \% | Equity | Net income / loss | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Direct | Total | €'000 | €'000 | ||
| RWE Wind Korehamn AB, Malmå/Sweden | 100 | 22,073 | 21,125 | ||
| RWE Wind Onshore \& PV Deutschland GmbH, Hanover | 100 | 84,326 | $-1$ | ||
| RWE Windpark Bedburg A44n GmbH \& Co. KG, Bedburg | 51 | 24,500 | 3,770 | ||
| RWE Windpark Bedburg GmbH \& Co. KG, Bedburg | 51 | 43,213 | 7,997 | ||
| RWE Windpark Garzweiler GmbH \& Co. KG, Essen | 51 | 38,982 | 3,875 | ||
| RWE Windpower Netherlands B.V., Geertruidenberg/Netherlands | 100 | 73,235 | 34,937 | ||
| RWE Wind Services Denmark A/S, Redby/Denmark | 100 | 20,688 | 10,406 | ||
| Sand Bluff WF Holdco, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | $-3,440$ | - | ||
| Sand Bluff Wind Farm, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | 140,260 | 10,375 | ||
| Sanford A, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | - | - | ||
| Sciato Ridge Solar LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | $-1,536$ | $-1,476$ | ||
| Seohoe Offshore Wind Power Co., Ltd., Taean-eup/South Korea | 100 | 9,015 | $-277$ | ||
| SEP II, LLC, Sacramento/USA | 100 | $-175,537$ | $-5,190$ | ||
| Settlers Trail Wind Farm, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | 46,605 | $-780$ | ||
| Seward NY 1, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | - | - | ||
| 5F Wind Enterprises, LLC, Roseville/USA | 100 | - | - | ||
| Shervalee Solar, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | - | - | ||
| Shrewsbury Solar, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | 5,221 | $-129$ | ||
| Sofia Offshore Wind Farm Holdings Limited, Swindon/United Kingdom | 100 | - | - | ||
| Sofia Offshore Wind Farm Limited, Swindon/United Kingdom | 100 | $-45,550$ | $-12,070$ | ||
| SOLARENGO Energia, Unipessoal, Lda., Coscois/Portugal | 100 | 3,381 | $-1,432$ | ||
| Solarengo Portugal, SGPS, Unipessoal Lda., Coscois/Portugal | 100 | 9,653 | $-10$ | ||
| South Boston VAA, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | - | - | ||
| Stillwater Energy Storage, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | 192 | 233 | ||
| Stoneridge Solar, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | $-16,900$ | $-11,581$ | ||
| Stony Creek Holdco, Wilmington/USA | 100 | 37,686 | - |
[^0]
[^0]: 1 Profit and loss-pooling agreement.
2 Figures from the Group's consolidated financial statements.
3 Newly founded, Financial statements not yet available.
4 Control by virtue of company contract.
5 No control by virtue of company contract.
6 Significant influence via indirect investments.
7 Significant influence by virtue of company contract.
8 No significant influence by virtue of company contract.
| I. Affiliated companies which are included in the consolidated financial statements | Shareholding in \% | Equity | Net income / loss | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Direct | Total | $€^{\prime} 000$ | $€^{\prime} 000$ | ||
| Stony Creek Wind Farm, Wilmington/USA | 100 | 34,416 | 1,977 | ||
| Stormvinden DA, Oslo/Norway | 89 | $-378$ | $-382$ | ||
| Sunflower Holdco I, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | 41,576 | - | ||
| Swansea MA 1, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | - | - | ||
| Switchgrass BESS, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | - | - | ||
| Switchgrass Solar I, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | $-12,626$ | 26 | ||
| Tober Solar 1 Inc., Vancouver/Canada | 100 | 9,836 | $-827$ | ||
| Tober Solar 2 Inc., Vancouver/Canada | 100 | 11,969 | 3,648 | ||
| Tamworth Holdings, LLC, Raleigh/USA | 100 | 9,088 | 77 | ||
| Tanager Holdings, LLC, Raleigh/USA | 100 | 8,154 | $-8$ | ||
| Tech Pork Solar, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | 14,931 | 602 | ||
| TEP EAA BJC Class B, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | 222,671 | $-476$ | ||
| TEP Financing Four, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | 343,117 | $-11,547$ | ||
| TEP Financing Seven Class B, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | - | - | ||
| TEP Financing Seven, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | - | - | ||
| TEP Financing Six Class B, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | 168,800 | $-32$ | ||
| TEP Financing Six, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | 168,970 | 131 | ||
| TEP Orchard Arrow Class B, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | 530,614 | $-16$ | ||
| TE Portfolio Financing One, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | 120,212 | $-5,814$ | ||
| TE Portfolio Financing Two, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | 240,672 | $-3,640$ | ||
| TEP Portfolio Financing Five, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | 510,251 | 3,789 | ||
| TEP Portfolio Financing Three, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | 220,728 | $-4,396$ | ||
| TEP Pyron Willowbrook Class B, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | 355,698 | $-68$ | ||
| TEP Sand Baron Class B, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | 251,404 | $-467$ | ||
| TEP Standard Class B, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | 227,049 | $-496$ | ||
| Texas Waves, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | 15,670 | $-593$ |
[^0]
[^0]: 1 Profit and loss-pooling agreement.
2 Figures from the Group's consolidated financial statements.
3 Newly founded, Financial statements not yet available.
4 Control by virtue of company contract.
5 No control by virtue of company contract.
6 Significant influence via indirect investments.
7 Significant influence by virtue of company contract.
8 No significant influence by virtue of company contract.

| I. Affiliated companies which are included in the consolidated financial statements | Shareholding in \% | Equity | Net income / loss | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Direct | Total | $€^{\prime} 000$ | $€^{\prime} 000$ | ||
| West of the Pecos Solar, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | 64,532 | $-3,765$ | ||
| Westside Canal 2A, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | - | 1,521 | ||
| Willowbrook Solar I, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | 214,566 | 13,951 | ||
| Windpark Eekerpolder B.V., Geertruidenberg/Netherlands | 100 | 31,990 | 6,730 | ||
| Windpark Kattenberg B.V., Geertruidenberg/Netherlands | 100 | 3,566 | 940 | ||
| Windpark Nordsee Ost GmbH, Heiligoland | 100 | 256 | -1 | ||
| Windpark Oostpolderdijk B.V., Geertruidenberg/Netherlands | 100 | 2,035 | 353 | ||
| Windwalkers, LLC, Des Moines/USA | 100 | - | - | ||
| Woodstock Hills LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | $-20,894$ | $-1,035$ | ||
| WR Groceland Solar, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | $-2,943$ | $-239$ | ||
| Wythe County Solar Project, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | $-28,363$ | $-4,656$ | ||
| Yellow Cat Wind LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | - | - | ||
| Zielone Glówczyce Sp. z o.o. w likwidacji, Słupsk/Poland | 100 | 1,501 | $-8,800$ |
[^0]
[^0]: 1 Profit and loss-pooling agreement.
2 Figures from the Group's consolidated financial statements.
3 Newly founded, financial statements not yet available.
4 Control by virtue of company contract.
5 No control by virtue of company contract.
6 Significant influence via indirect investments.
7 Significant influence by virtue of company contract.
8 No significant influence by virtue of company contract.
| II. Affiliated companies which are not included in the consolidated financial statements due to secondary importance for the assets, liabilities, financial position and profit or loss of the Group | Shareholding in \% | Equity | Net income / loss | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Direct | Total | $€^{\prime} 000$ | $€^{\prime} 000$ | |
| 45th Parallel Solar, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | - | $-^{3}$ | |
| Acocil Recursos Ambientales, S. de R.L. de C.V., Mexico City/Mexico | 100 | - | - | |
| Adams MIA, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | - | $-^{3}$ | |
| Agenzia Carboni S.r.l., Genoa/Italy | 100 | 410 | 47 | |
| Ajolote Recursos Ambientales, S. de R.L. de C.V., Mexico City/Mexico | 100 | - | - | |
| Amole Recursos Ambientales, S. de R.L. de C.V., Mexico City/Mexico | 100 | - | - | |
| Anemos Ala Segarra, S.L., Barcelona/Spain | 100 | $-10$ | $-13$ | |
| Antlers Road Solar, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | - | - | |
| Auzoberri Desarrollo, S.L.U., Barcelona/Spain | 100 | 114 | $-10$ | |
| Azagra Energy Quel, S.L.U., Barcelona/Spain | 100 | 363 | $-9$ | |
| Bayou Macon Solar, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | - | - | |
| Bazingo Offshore Wind Holding Pty. Ltd., Melbourne/Australia | 100 | - | - | |
| Bazingo Offshore Wind Pty. Ltd., Melbourne/Australia | 100 | - | - | |
| Beargrass Solar Inc., Vancouver/Canada | 100 | - | - | |
| Big Pine Solar, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | - | $-^{3}$ | |
| Biznaga Recursos Ambientales, S. de R.L. de C.V., Mexico City/Mexico | 100 | - | - | |
| Blackbeard Solar, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | - | - | |
| Blueberry Hills LLC, Chicago/USA | 100 | - | - | |
| Bluestem Solar Form, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | - | $-^{3}$ | |
| BO Baltic Offshore GmbH, Hamburg | 98 | 2 | - | |
| Bowler Flats Energy Hub LLC, Chicago/USA | 100 | - | - | |
| Bristol CTA, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | - | $-^{3}$ | |
| Buckeye Wind LLC, Chicago/USA | 100 | - | - | |
| Burgor Hill Wind Form Limited, Swindon/United Kingdom | 100 | - | - | |
| Comaiore Sp. z o.o. w likwidacji, Warsaw/Poland | 100 | 264 | $-208$ | |
| Camellia Solar LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | - | - |
[^0]
[^0]: 1 Profit and loss-pooling agreement.
2 Figures from the Group's consolidated financial statements.
3 Newly founded, financial statements not yet available.
4 Control by virtue of company contract.
5 No control by virtue of company contract.
6 Significant influence via indirect investments.
7 Significant influence by virtue of company contract.
8 No significant influence by virtue of company contract.
| II. Affiliated companies which are not included in the consolidated financial statements due to secondary importance for the assets, liabilities, financial position and profit or loss of the Group | Shareholding in \% | Equity | Net income / loss | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Direct | Total | $€^{\prime} 000$ | $€^{\prime} 000$ | |
| Comellia Solar Member LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | - | - | |
| Camster II Wind Farm Limited, Swindon/United Kingdom | 100 | - | - | |
| Canal Crossing Solar, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | - | - | |
| Cardinal Wind Farm, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | - | - | |
| Casarano Sp. z o.o. w likwidacji, Warsaw/Poland | 100 | 323 | $-526$ | |
| Cassius Blue Solar LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | - | $-^{3}$ | |
| Cottleman Wind Farm II, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | - | - | |
| Cottleman Wind Farm, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | - | - | |
| Cecina Sp. z o.o. w likwidacji, Warsaw/Poland | 100 | 247 | $-224$ | |
| Cedor Ridge PV I, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | - | $-^{3}$ | |
| Cempasúchil Recursos Ambientales, S. de R.L. de C.V., Mexico City/Mexico | 100 | - | - | |
| Cercola Sp. z o.o. w likwidacji, Warsaw/Poland | 100 | 978 | $-181$ | |
| Cerignola Sp. z o.o. w likwidacji, Warsaw/Poland | 100 | 971 | $-181$ | |
| Champaign Wind LLC, Chicago/USA | 100 | - | - | |
| Champloin PV I, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | - | $-^{3}$ | |
| Choptank Solar \& Storage, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | - | $-^{3}$ | |
| Clinton Wind, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | - | - | |
| Colibri Recursos Ambientales, S. de R.L. de C.V., Mexico City/Mexico | 100 | - | - | |
| Cordeneos Sp. z o.o. w likwidacji, Warsaw/Poland | 100 | 1,123 | $-166$ | |
| Cordova Wind Farm, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | - | - | |
| Corning Solar, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | - | - | |
| Covina Reliability Project LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | - | $-^{3}$ | |
| Coyote Road Solar, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | - | $-^{3}$ | |
| Cremona Sp. z o.o. w likwidacji, Warsaw/Poland | 100 | 222 | $-249$ | |
| Crooked Creek Solar, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | - | $-^{3}$ | |
| Decodia GmbH, Essen | 100 | 100 | 3,865 | 1,317 |
[^0]
[^0]: 1 Profit and loss-pooling agreement.
2 Figures from the Group's consolidated financial statements.
3 Newly founded, Financial statements not yet available.
4 Control by virtue of company contract.
5 No control by virtue of company contract.
6 Significant influence via indirect investments.
7 Significant influence by virtue of company contract.
8 No significant influence by virtue of company contract.
| II. Affiliated companies which are not included in the consolidated financial statements due to secondary importance for the assets, liabilities, financial position and profit or loss of the Group | Shareholding in \% | Equity | Net income / loss | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Direct | Total | $€^{\prime} 000$ | $€^{\prime} 000$ | |
| Dohema Offshore sp. z o.o. w likwidacji, Slupsk/Poland | 100 | 145 | $-1$ | |
| Duck Lake Power, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | - | $-^{3}$ | |
| Eko-En 5 Sp. z o.o., Warsaw/Poland | 100 | $-133$ | $-27$ | |
| Eko-En 6 Sp. z o.o., Warsaw/Poland | 100 | $-25$ | $-25$ | |
| Elbehofen LNG GmbH, Essen | 100 | 13,141 | - | |
| Elliott Solar, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | - | - | |
| Elm Springs VAB, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | - | $-^{3}$ | |
| Enfield CTA, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | - | $-^{3}$ | |
| Edilica Alto Anoia, S.L., Barcelona/Spain | 100 | $-4$ | $-7$ | |
| Edilica La Conca 2, S.L., Barcelona/Spain | 100 | 3 | - | |
| Edilica La Conca 3, S.L., Barcelona/Spain | 100 | 3 | - | |
| Edilica La Conca, S.L., Barcelona/Spain | 100 | 3 | - | |
| ETI Green Gas Limited, London/United Kingdom | 100 | - | $-^{3}$ | |
| ETI NA Investments GmbH, Essen | 100 | 5,330 | $-1,073$ | |
| ETI UK Holding Limited, London/United Kingdom | 100 | - | $-^{3}$ | |
| ETI Wind Holdings Limited, London/United Kingdom | 100 | 9,059 | $-241$ | |
| EverPower Maine LLC, Chicago/USA | 100 | - | - | |
| EverPower Ohio LLC, Chicago/USA | 100 | - | - | |
| EverPower Solar LLC, Chicago/USA | 100 | - | - | |
| EverPower Wind Development, LLC, Chicago/USA | 100 | - | - | |
| E \& Z Industrie-Lösungen GmbH, Essen | 100 | 4,397 | 220 | |
| Farmington CTA, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | - | $-^{3}$ | |
| Flatlands Wind Farm, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | - | - | |
| Flexilis Power Limited, Kilkenny/Ireland | 100 | 94 | $-1$ | |
| Florida Solar and Power Group LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | - | - | |
| Fotovoltaico Delibes, S.A. de C.V., Mexico City/Mexico | 100 | - | - |
[^0]
[^0]: 1 Profit and loss-pooling agreement.
2 Figures from the Group's consolidated financial statements.
3 Newly founded, Financial statements not yet available.
4 Control by virtue of company contract.
5 No control by virtue of company contract.
6 Significant influence via indirect investments.
7 Significant influence by virtue of company contract.
8 No significant influence by virtue of company contract.
| II. Affiliated companies which are not included in the consolidated financial statements due to secondary importance for the assets, liabilities, financial position and profit or loss of the Group | Shareholding in \% | Equity | Net income / loss | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Direct | Total | $€^{\prime} 000$ | $€^{\prime} 000$ | |
| Fourth Quarter BESS, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | - | - | |
| Frankford DEA, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | - | - $^{\text {a }}$ | |
| Frazier Solar, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | - | - | |
| Gas Link Lubmin GmbH, Essen | 100 | 1,302 | - | |
| GBV AchtunddreiBigste Gesellschaft für Beteiligungsverwaltung mbH, Essen | 100 | 25 | - $^{\text {b }}$ | |
| GBV DreiunddreiBigste Gesellschaft für Beteiligungsverwaltung mbH, Essen | 100 | 100 | 25 | - $^{\text {b }}$ |
| GBV Dreiundvierzigste Gesellschaft für Beteiligungsverwaltung mbH, Essen | 100 | 100 | 23 | -1 |
| GBV EinunddreiBigste Gesellschaft für Beteiligungsverwaltung mbH, Essen | 100 | 100 | 30 | - $^{\text {b }}$ |
| GBV Siebte Gesellschaft für Beteiligungsverwaltung mbH, Essen | 100 | 100 | - $^{\text {b }}$ | |
| GBV Zweiundvierzigste Gesellschaft für Beteiligungsverwaltung mbH, Essen | 100 | 100 | 23 | - |
| Gesellschaft für Beteiligungs- und Pensionsverwaltung 41 mbH , Essen | 100 | 7,808 | $-487$ | |
| Geun Heung Offshore Wind Power Co., Ltd., Seoul/South Korea | 100 | 6 | - | |
| Grand Junction MIA, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | - | - $^{\text {c }}$ | |
| Grondview Wind Farm III, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | - | - | |
| Grondview Wind Farm IV, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | - | - | |
| Grondview Wind Farm V, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | - | - | |
| Greene Solar, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | - | - | |
| Green Gecco Verwaltungs GmbH, Essen | 51 | 41 | - | |
| Greensburg Solar, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | - | - | |
| Greenswitch Wind, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | - | - | |
| Green Twelve S.r.I., Verona/Italy | 100 | $-74$ | $-32$ | |
| Greenwood Power, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | - | - $^{\text {d }}$ | |
| Groene Wind Power B.V., Geertruidenberg/Netherlands | 100 | - | - $^{\text {d }}$ | |
| Groene Wind Power C.V., Geertruidenberg/Netherlands | 100 | - | - $^{\text {d }}$ | |
| Grottoes VAA, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | - | - |
[^0]
[^0]: 1 Profit and loss-pooling agreement.
2 Figures from the Group's consolidated financial statements.
3 Newly founded, financial statements not yet available.
4 Control by virtue of company contract.
5 No control by virtue of company contract.
6 Significant influence via indirect investments.
7 Significant influence by virtue of company contract.
8 No significant influence by virtue of company contract.
| II. Affiliated companies which are not included in the consolidated financial statements due to secondary importance for the assets, liabilities, financial position and profit or loss of the Group | Shareholding in \% | Equity | Net income /loss | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Direct | Total | $€^{\prime} 000$ | $€^{\prime} 000$ | |
| Harryburn Wind Farm Limited, Swindon/United Kingdom | 100 | - | 4 | |
| Haube Wind Sp. z o.o., Slupsk/Poland | 100 | 106 | $-1$ | |
| Highland III LLC, Chicago/USA | 100 | - | - | |
| Hillclimber Solar, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | - | $-^{1}$ | |
| Horse Thief Wind Project LLC, Chicago/USA | 100 | - | - | |
| INDI Energie B.V., 's-Hertogenbosch/Netherlands | 100 | 351 | 32 | |
| INDI Solar-Projects 1 B.V., 's-Hertogenbosch/Netherlands | 100 | 305 | 22 | |
| Infraestructuros de Aldehuelas, S.A., Barcelona/Spain | 100 | 428 | - | |
| Infrastrukturgesellschaft Netz Lübz mit beschränkter Haftung, Hanover | 100 | 38 | $-36$ | |
| Iron Horse Battery Storage, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | $-8,928$ | $-457$ | |
| Janus Solar PV, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | - | - | |
| JBM Solar Projects 38 Ltd., Swindon/United Kingdom | 100 | $-13$ | $-8$ | |
| Jimble Offshore Wind Holding Pty. Ltd., Melbourne/Australia | 100 | - | - | |
| Jimble Offshore Wind Pty. Ltd., Melbourne/Australia | 100 | - | - | |
| Jugendco Desarrollo, S.L.U., Barcelona/Spain | 100 | 901 | $-34$ | |
| Kestrel Energy Storage, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | - | - | |
| Key Solar, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | - | - | |
| Kyan Solar, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | - | - | |
| Loke Fork Wind Farm, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | - | - | |
| Lampasas Wind LLC, Chicago/USA | 100 | - | - | |
| Lasso Wind, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | - | - | |
| Los Vaguados II Solar S.L., Barcelona/Spain | 100 | $-21$ | $-13$ | |
| Lincoln Solar Farm, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | - | - | |
| Littlefield Tox Partners, LLC, New York City/USA | 70 | 2,835 | - | |
| Mohanoy Mountain, LLC, Chicago/USA | 100 | - | - |
[^0]
[^0]: 1 Profit and loss-pooling agreement.
2 Figures from the Group's consolidated financial statements.
3 Newly founded, Financial statements not yet available.
4 Control by virtue of company contract.
5 No control by virtue of company contract.
6 Significant influence vio indirect investments.
7 Significant influence by virtue of company contract.
8 No significant influence by virtue of company contract.
| II. Affiliated companies which are not included in the consolidated financial statements due to secondary importance for the assets, liabilities, financial position and profit or loss of the Group | Shareholding in \% | Equity | Net income /loss | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Direct | Total | $€^{\prime} 000$ | $€^{\prime} 000$ | |
| Major Wind Farm, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | - | - | |
| March Road Solar, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | - | - | |
| Maricopa East Solar PV 2, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | - | - | |
| Maricopa East Solar PV, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | - | - | |
| Maricopa Land Holding, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | - | - | |
| Maricopa West Solar PV 2, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | - | - | |
| Maryland Sunlight 1 LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | - | - | |
| Midway Solar 1, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | - | $-^{3}$ | |
| Midway Solar, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | - | $-^{3}$ | |
| Moasi Solar 1, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | - | - | |
| Moasi Solar 2, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | - | - | |
| Monroe CTA, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | - | $-^{3}$ | |
| Morska Forma Wiatrowa Antares Sp. z o.o. w likwidacji, Warsaw/Poland | 100 | 422 | $-593$ | |
| Mud Springs Wind Project LLC, Chicago/USA | 100 | - | - | |
| Mufiegre Desarrollo, S.L.U., Barcelona/Spain | 100 | 172 | $-19$ | |
| Mur Power, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | - | $-^{3}$ | |
| Nathalie VAC, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | - | - | |
| Nathalie VAL, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | - | - | |
| Newington CTA, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | - | $-^{3}$ | |
| Newtown CTA, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | - | $-^{3}$ | |
| Northern Orchard Solar PV 2, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | - | - | |
| Nouvions Poste de Raccordement SAS, Clichy/France | 100 | $-8$ | $-1$ | |
| NY Queens C, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | - | $-^{3}$ | |
| Offshore Wind Three GmbH, Essen | 100 | - | $-^{3}$ | |
| OHD Offshore Hydrogen Development Administration Two GmbH, Berlin | 100 | 39 | 8 |
[^0]
[^0]: 1 Profit and loss-pooling agreement.
2 Figures from the Group's consolidated financial statements.
3 Newly founded, Financial statements not yet available.
4 Control by virtue of company contract.
5 No control by virtue of company contract.
6 Significant influence via indirect investments.
7 Significant influence by virtue of company contract.
8 No significant influence by virtue of company contract.
| II. Affiliated companies which are not included in the consolidated financial statements due to secondary importance for the assets, liabilities, financial position and profit or loss of the Group | Shareholding in \% | Equity | Net income / loss | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Direct | Total | $€^{\prime} 000$ | $€^{\prime} 000$ | |
| OHD Offshore Hydrogen Development One GmbH, Essen | 100 | 23 | - | |
| OHD Offshore Hydrogen Development Two GmbH \& Co. KG, Essen | 100 | 35 | $-10$ | |
| Ohio Sunlight 1 LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | - | - | |
| Olmunite Investments sp. z o.o. w likwidacji, Slupsk/Poland | 100 | - | $-6$ | |
| Oranje Wind Power B.V., Geertruidenberg/Netherlands | 100 | - | - | |
| Oranje Wind Power C.V., Geertruidenberg/Netherlands | 100 | 100 | - | |
| Ostsee LNG Holding GmbH, Essen | 100 | 4,322 | - | |
| Ostsee LNG Terminal GmbH, Essen | 100 | 24 | - | |
| Owen Prairie Wind Farm, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | - | - | |
| Oyamel Recursos Ambientales, S. de R.L. de C.V., Mexico City/Mexico | 100 | - | - | |
| Palo Verde Wind, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | - | - | |
| Panther Creek Solar, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | - | - | |
| Parc Agricolataique de Boeuf SAS, Clichy/France | 100 | - | $-^{3}$ | |
| Parc Agricolataique de Brécy et Villabon SAS, Clichy/France | 100 | 37 | - | |
| Parc Agricolataique de Dinay SAS, Clichy/France | 100 | 37 | - | |
| Parc Agricolataique de la Plaigne SAS, Clichy/France | 100 | 36 | $-1$ | |
| Parc Agricolataique de Rougeot SAS, Clichy/France | 100 | - | $-^{3}$ | |
| Parc Agricolataique des Autriots SAS, Clichy/France | 100 | 37 | - | |
| Parc Agricolataique du Défens SAS, Clichy/France | 100 | - | $-^{3}$ | |
| Parc de Stockage d'Electricité de Vesigneul SAS, Clichy/France | 100 | 35 | - | |
| Parc Eolien 113 SAS, Clichy/France | 100 | 36 | $-1$ | |
| Parc Eolien 121 SAS, Clichy/France | 100 | - | $-^{3}$ | |
| Parc Eolien 122 SAS, Clichy/France | 100 | - | $-^{3}$ | |
| Parc Eolien 124 SAS, Clichy/France | 100 | - | $-^{3}$ | |
| Parc Eolien 125 SAS, Clichy/France | 100 | - | $-^{3}$ |
[^0]
[^0]: 1 Profit and loss-pooling agreement.
2 Figures from the Group's consolidated financial statements.
3 Newly founded, Financial statements not yet available.
4 Control by virtue of company contract.
5 No control by virtue of company contract.
6 Significant influence vio indirect investments.
7 Significant influence by virtue of company contract.
8 No significant influence by virtue of company contract.
| II. Affiliated companies which are not included in the consolidated financial statements due to secondary importance for the assets, liabilities, financial position and profit or loss of the Group | Shareholding in \% | Equity | Net income / loss | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Direct | Total | $€^{\prime} 000$ | $€^{\prime} 000$ | ||
| Parc Eolien d'Auppegard SAS, Clichy/France | 100 | 37 | - | ||
| Parc Eolien de Autmont SAS, Clichy/France | 100 | - | $-^{3}$ | ||
| Parc Eolien De Conny SAS, Clichy/France | 100 | 29 | $-2$ | ||
| Parc Eolien de Chazelles SAS, Clichy/France | 100 | - | $-^{3}$ | ||
| Parc Eolien de Ciré d'Aunis et d'Ardillières SAS, Clichy/France | 100 | $-2$ | $-22$ | ||
| Parc Eolien De Foissy-Sur-Vanne SAS, Clichy/France | 100 | 28 | $-2$ | ||
| Parc Eolien de Fouchères aux Bois SAS, Clichy/France | 100 | 29 | $-1$ | ||
| Parc Eolien De Ganochaud SAS, Clichy/France | 100 | 13 | $-4$ | ||
| Parc Eolien De La Cabane Blanche SAS, Clichy/France | 100 | $-761$ | $-781$ | ||
| Parc Eolien De La Croix Blanche SAS, Clichy/France | 100 | 24 | $-1$ | ||
| Parc Eolien de la Maison des Champs SAS, Clichy/France | 100 | 37 | - | ||
| Parc Eolien de Longonnet SAS, Clichy/France | 100 | 38 | 1 | ||
| Parc Eolien de la Petite Woèvre SAS, Clichy/France | 100 | - | $-^{3}$ | ||
| Parc Eolien de la Plaine des Voulois SAS, Clichy/France | 100 | 36 | $-1$ | ||
| Parc Eolien de la Souche SAS, Clichy/France | 100 | 36 | - | ||
| Parc Eolien de la Vallée de l'Eouine SAS, Clichy/France | 100 | 23 | $-4$ | ||
| Parc Eolien De Mesbrecourt-Richecourt SAS, Clichy/France | 100 | - | $-20$ | ||
| Parc Eolien de Morgot SAS, Clichy/France | 100 | 30 | $-2$ | ||
| Parc Eolien De Nuisement Et Cheniers SAS, Clichy/France | 100 | 28 | $-2$ | ||
| Parc Eolien de Pys et le Sors SAS, Clichy/France | 100 | - | $-^{3}$ | ||
| Parc Eolien de Ragny SAS, Clichy/France | 100 | - | $-^{3}$ | ||
| Parc Eolien des Ailes du Gotinois SAS, Clichy/France | 100 | $-9$ | $-40$ | ||
| Parc Eolien de Saint-Vaast-D'Equiqueville SAS, Clichy/France | 100 | 36 | $-1$ | ||
| Parc Eolien des Baumes SAS, Clichy/France | 100 | 31 | $-1$ | ||
| Parc Eolien des Cinq Poiriers SAS, Clichy/France | 100 | 31 | $-1$ |
[^0]
[^0]: 1 Profit and loss-pooling agreement.
2 Figures from the Group's consolidated financial statements.
3 Newly founded, Financial statements not yet available.
4 Control by virtue of company contract.
5 No control by virtue of company contract.
6 Significant influence via indirect investments.
7 Significant influence by virtue of company contract.
8 No significant influence by virtue of company contract.
| II. Affiliated companies which are not included in the consolidated financial statements due to secondary importance for the assets, liabilities, financial position and profit or loss of the Group | Shareholding in \% | Equity | Net income / loss | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Direct | Total | $€^{\prime} 000$ | $€^{\prime} 000$ | ||
| Parc Eolien de Senan SAS, Clichy/France | 100 | 37 | - | ||
| Parc Eolien des Marchellions SAS, Clichy/France | 100 | 37 | - | ||
| Parc Eolien des Milles Vents SAS, Clichy/France | 100 | 29 | $-3$ | ||
| Parc Eolien De Soudron SAS, Clichy/France | 100 | 28 | $-1$ | ||
| Parc Eolien des Portes de Bourgogne SAS, Clichy/France | 100 | 35 | $-2$ | ||
| Parc Eolien des Pressoirs SAS, Clichy/France | 100 | 31 | $-1$ | ||
| Parc Eolien Des Roisinières SAS, Clichy/France | 100 | $-31$ | $-60$ | ||
| Parc Eolien des Retavernes SAS, Clichy/France | 100 | - | $-^{3}$ | ||
| Parc Eolien de Valian SAS, Clichy/France | 100 | - | $-^{3}$ | ||
| Parc Eolien Du Bocage SAS, Clichy/France | 100 | $-148$ | $-44$ | ||
| Parc Eolien du Buis SAS, Clichy/France | 100 | - | $-^{3}$ | ||
| Parc Eolien Du Champ Madame SAS, Clichy/France | 100 | 13 | $-17$ | ||
| Parc Eolien du Chemin de Châlons 2 SAS, Clichy/France | 100 | 36 | $-1$ | ||
| Parc Eolien Du Chemin Vert SAS, Clichy/France | 100 | 12 | $-17$ | ||
| Parc Eolien du Fossé Chatillon SAS, Clichy/France | 100 | 36 | $-1$ | ||
| Parc Eolien Du Mont Hellet SAS, Clichy/France | 100 | 29 | $-1$ | ||
| Parc Eolien Du Mont Herbé SAS, Clichy/France | 100 | 9 | $-11$ | ||
| Parc Eolien du Plateau de la Chapelle-sur-Chèzy SAS, Clichy/France | 100 | 28 | $-2$ | ||
| Parc Eolien Du Ru Garnier SAS, Clichy/France | 100 | 2 | $-17$ | ||
| Parc Eolien entre Pierre et Morains SAS, Clichy/France | 100 | 21 | $-2$ | ||
| Parc Eolien Les Beaux Piliers SAS, Clichy/France | 100 | - | $-^{3}$ | ||
| Parc Eolien les Cœurs de Bœuf SAS, Clichy/France | 100 | 37 | - | ||
| Parc Solaire 10 SAS, Clichy/France | 100 | - | $-^{3}$ | ||
| Parc Solaire 1 SAS, Clichy/France | 100 | - | $-^{3}$ | ||
| Parc Solaire de Cléré les Pins SAS, Clichy/France | 100 | 37 | - |
[^0]
[^0]: 1 Profit and loss-pooling agreement.
2 Figures from the Group's consolidated financial statements.
3 Newly founded, Financial statements not yet available.
4 Control by virtue of company contract.
5 No control by virtue of company contract.
6 Significant influence vio indirect investments.
7 Significant influence by virtue of company contract.
8 No significant influence by virtue of company contract.
| II. Affiliated companies which are not included in the consolidated financial statements due to secondary importance for the assets, liabilities, financial position and profit or loss of the Group | Shareholding in \% | Equity | Net income /loss | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Direct | Total | $€^{\prime} 000$ | $€^{\prime} 000$ | |
| Parc Solaire de Courgeon SAS, Clichy/France | 100 | - | $-^{3}$ | |
| Parc Solaire de Cressia SAS, Clichy/France | 100 | 37 | - | |
| Parc Solaire de Gonnat SAS, Clichy/France | 100 | 37 | - | |
| Parc Solaire de la Boisselière SAS, Clichy/France | 100 | 36 | $-1$ | |
| Parc Solaire de l'Echineou SAS, Clichy/France | 100 | 31 | $-2$ | |
| Parc Solaire de Pimorin SAS, Clichy/France | 100 | 31 | $-2$ | |
| Parc Solaire des Hermittes SAS, Clichy/France | 100 | 36 | $-1$ | |
| Parc Solaire des Landes Borrades SAS, Clichy/France | 100 | 37 | - | |
| Parc Solaire de Vergy SAS, Clichy/France | 100 | 37 | - | |
| Parc Solaire du Piolay SAS, Clichy/France | 100 | - | $-^{4}$ | |
| Parc Ynni Cymunedol Alwen Cyfyngedig, Swindon/United Kingdom | 100 | - | - | |
| Parque Eólico El Ópolo, S. de R.L. de C.V., Mexico City/Mexico | 100 | - | - | |
| Pawnee Spirit Wind Farm, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | - | - | |
| Paz'Eole SAS, Clichy/France | 100 | $-10$ | $-32$ | |
| Peaceful Hollow BESS, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | - | $-^{3}$ | |
| Pearl Moon Solar, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | - | $-^{3}$ | |
| Pe Elí North LLC, Chicago/USA | 100 | - | - | |
| PI E\&P US Holding LLC, New York City/USA | 100 | 64,581 | 5,841 | |
| Pinckard Solar LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | - | - | |
| Pinckard Solar Member LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | - | - | |
| Pinto Pass, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | - | - | |
| Pipkin Ranch Wind Farm, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | - | - | |
| Pleasant Valley Solar Farm, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | - | - | |
| Poste HTB Centre 1 SAS, Clichy/France | 100 | - | $-^{3}$ | |
| Poste HTB Grand Est 1 SAS, Clichy/France | 100 | 22 | $-8$ |
[^0]
[^0]: 1 Profit and loss-pooling agreement.
2 Figures from the Group's consolidated financial statements.
3 Newly founded, Financial statements not yet available.
4 Control by virtue of company contract.
5 No control by virtue of company contract.
6 Significant influence vio indirect investments.
7 Significant influence by virtue of company contract.
8 No significant influence by virtue of company contract.
| II. Affiliated companies which are not included in the consolidated financial statements due to secondary importance for the assets, liabilities, financial position and profit or loss of the Group | Shareholding in \% | Equity | Net income / loss | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Direct | Total | $€^{\prime} 000$ | $€^{\prime} 000$ | |
| Poste HTB Houts de France 1 SAS, Clichy/France | 100 | 36 | $-1$ | |
| Poste HTB Houts de France 2 SAS, Clichy/France | 100 | 16 | $-3$ | |
| Poste HTB Normandie 1 SAS, Clichy/France | 100 | 31 | $-2$ | |
| Projet Agrivoltaique de la Charité SAS, Clichy/France | 100 | - | $-^{3}$ | |
| Projet Agrivoltaique de la Frenière d'en Hout SAS, Clichy/France | 100 | - | $-^{3}$ | |
| Projet Agrivoltaique de Montréal-du-Gers SAS, Clichy/France | 100 | - | $-^{3}$ | |
| Projet Agrivoltaique de Sallèles-d'Aude SAS, Clichy/France | 100 | - | $-^{3}$ | |
| Proyectos Solares Iberia III, S.L., Barcelona/Spain | 100 | $-289$ | $-216$ | |
| Proyectos Solares Iberia II, S.L., Barcelona/Spain | 100 | $-15$ | $-20$ | |
| Proyectos Solares Iberia I, S.L., Barcelona/Spain | 100 | 5 | $-7$ | |
| Proyectos Solares Iberia V, S.L., Barcelona/Spain | 100 | 4 | $-7$ | |
| Pryor Coves Wind Project LLC, Chicago/USA | 100 | - | - | |
| PT Rheincoal Supply \& Trading Indonesia, PT, Jakarta/Indonesia | 100 | 4,265 | $-636$ | |
| OC15 Transfer, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | - | $-^{3}$ | |
| Queens NYB, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | - | $-^{3}$ | |
| Queens NYD, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | - | $-^{3}$ | |
| Quintana Fotovoltaica S.L.U., Barcelona/Spain | 100 | $-22$ | $-15$ | |
| R3 Antioch, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | - | - | |
| R3 Bear Run, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | - | - | |
| R3 Benton, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | - | - | |
| R3 Billings, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | - | - | |
| R3 Charger, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | - | - | |
| R3 Chinook, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | - | - | |
| R3 Francisco, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | - | - | |
| R3 Friendsville, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | - | - |
[^0]
[^0]: 1 Profit and loss-pooling agreement.
2 Figures from the Group's consolidated financial statements.
3 Newly founded, Financial statements not yet available.
4 Control by virtue of company contract.
5 No control by virtue of company contract.
6 Significant influence via indirect investments.
7 Significant influence by virtue of company contract.
8 No significant influence by virtue of company contract.
| II. Affiliated companies which are not included in the consolidated financial statements due to secondary importance for the assets, liabilities, financial position and profit or loss of the Group | Shareholding in \% | Equity | Net income / loss | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Direct | Total | $€^{\prime} 000$ | $€^{\prime} 000$ | |
| R3 Gateway, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | - | - | |
| R3 Old Ben, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | - | - | |
| R3 Renewables Land Holdings, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | - | - | |
| R3 Shornrock, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | - | - | |
| R3 Wild Boar, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | - | - | |
| Robbit's Foot Solor, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | - | $-^{3}$ | |
| RD Hanau GmbH, Hanau | 100 | 2,050 | $-^{1}$ | |
| Remington BESS, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | - | $-^{3}$ | |
| Renewables JV GmbH, Essen | 100 | 224 | $-1$ | |
| R-Gen Renewables Limited, Altrinchom/United Kingdom | 100 | 746 | $-350$ | |
| Riboforado Energy Riboforada, S.L.U., Borcelona/Spain | 100 | 190 | $-9$ | |
| Rose Rock Wind Farm, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | - | - | |
| Rouget Road Solar Farm, LLC, Lake Mary/USA | 100 | - | - | |
| R.O.W.P., Unipessoal Lda, Lisbon/Portugal | 100 | - | $-^{3}$ | |
| RWE Carbon Sourcing North America, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | - | - | |
| RWE Cottle Creek Onshore Wind Holding Pty. Ltd., Melbourne/Australia | 100 | - | $-^{1}$ | |
| RWE Cottle Creek Onshore Wind Pty. Ltd., Melbourne/Australia | 100 | - | $-^{1}$ | |
| RWE CC, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | - | - | |
| RWE Clean Energy Land, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | - | - | |
| RWE Development Germany Four GmbH, Essen | 100 | 25 | $-^{1}$ | |
| RWE Development Germany One GmbH, Essen | 100 | 25 | $-^{1}$ | |
| RWE Development Germany Three GmbH, Essen | 100 | 25 | $-^{1}$ | |
| RWE Development Germany Two GmbH, Essen | 100 | 25 | $-^{1}$ | |
| RWE Dhabi Union Energy LLC, Abu Dhabi/United Arab Emirates | 49 | 39 | - | |
| RWE Finance Europe B.V., Geertruidenberg/Netherlands | 100 | 100 | 9,996 | $-4$ |
[^0]
[^0]: 1 Profit and loss-pooling agreement.
2 Figures from the Group's consolidated financial statements.
3 Newly founded, Financial statements not yet available.
4 Control by virtue of company contract.
5 No control by virtue of company contract.
6 Significant influence vio indirect investments.
7 Significant influence by virtue of company contract.
8 No significant influence by virtue of company contract.
| II. Affiliated companies which are not included in the consolidated financial statements due to secondary importance for the assets, liabilities, financial position and profit or loss of the Group | Shareholding in \% | Equity | Net income /loss | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Direct | Total | €'000 | €'000 | |
| RWE Gas Storage Beteiligungsverwaltungs GmbH, Essen | 100 | 11,257 | 246 | |
| RWE Generation Service GmbH, Essen | 100 | 25 | $-1$ | |
| RWE H2 DK A/S, Copenhagen/Denmark | 100 | 632 | 15 | |
| RWE Hydrogen Lingen Management GmbH, Lingen (Ems) | 100 | 27 | - | |
| RWE indeland Windpark Eschweiler Verwaltungs GmbH, Eschweiler | 100 | 76 | 5 | |
| RWE Ingenlus Limited, Swindon/United Kingdom | 100 | 5,941 | 2,872 | |
| RWE KL Limited, Swindon/United Kingdom | 100 | - | - | |
| RWE Neuland Erneuerbare Energien Verwaltungs GmbH, Niederzier | 100 | 32 | 7 | |
| RWE Offshore Belgium N.V., Brussels/Belgium | 100 | - | $-3$ | |
| RWE Offshore US Gulf, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | - | - | |
| RWE Offshore Wind Netherlands Participations I B.V., Geertruidenberg/Netherlands | 100 | - | - | |
| RWE Offshore Wind Netherlands Participations II B.V., Geertruidenberg/Netherlands | 100 | - | - | |
| RWE Offshore Wind Netherlands Participations III B.V., Geertruidenberg/Netherlands | 100 | - | - | |
| RWE Offshore Wind Netherlands Participations IV B.V., Geertruidenberg/Netherlands | 100 | - | - | |
| RWE Offshore Wind Netherlands Participations IX B.V., Geertruidenberg/Netherlands | 100 | - | $-3$ | |
| RWE Offshore Wind Netherlands Participations X B.V., Geertruidenberg/Netherlands | 100 | - | $-3$ | |
| RWE Offshore Wind Netherlands Participations XI B.V., Geertruidenberg/Netherlands | 100 | - | $-3$ | |
| RWE Offshore Wind Netherlands Participations XII B.V., Geertruidenberg/Netherlands | 100 | - | $-3$ | |
| RWE Offshore Wind Narway 2 AS, Oslo/Norway | 100 | - | $-10$ | |
| RWE OWEL, Beheer B.V., Geertruidenberg/Netherlands | 100 | - | - | |
| RWE OWEL C.V., Geertruidenberg/Netherlands | 100 | 100 | - | |
| RWE OWEL Participations I B.V., Geertruidenberg/Netherlands | 100 | - | - | |
| RWE OWEL Participations II B.V., Geertruidenberg/Netherlands | 100 | - | - | |
| RWE OWEL Participations III B.V., Geertruidenberg/Netherlands | 100 | - | - | |
| RWE OWEL Participations IV B.V., Geertruidenberg/Netherlands | 100 | - | - |
[^0]
[^0]: 1 Profit and loss-pooling agreement.
2 Figures from the Group's consolidated financial statements.
3 Newly founded, Financial statements not yet available.
4 Control by virtue of company contract.
5 No control by virtue of company contract.
6 Significant influence vio indirect investments.
7 Significant influence by virtue of company contract.
8 No significant influence by virtue of company contract.
| II. Affiliated companies which are not included in the consolidated financial statements due to secondary importance for the assets, liabilities, financial position and profit or loss of the Group | Shareholding in \% | Equity | Net income / loss | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Direct | Total | $€^{\prime} 000$ | $€^{\prime} 000$ | |
| RWE Pensionsfonds AG, Essen | 100 | 100 | 3,933 | 121 |
| RWE Principal Investments UK Limited,Swindon/United Kingdom | 100 | 1,035 | $-1,123$ | |
| RWE Principal Investments USA, LLC, New York City/USA | 100 | 55,448 | $-207$ | |
| RWE Renewables Chile SpA, Santiago/Chile | 100 | - | - | |
| RWE Renewables Erste Beteiligungs GmbH, Essen | 100 | - | $-^{3}$ | |
| RWE Renewables Estonia 10 OÜ, Tallinn/Estonia | 100 | 32 | - | |
| RWE Renewables Estonia 2 OÜ, Tallinn/Estonia | 100 | 32 | - | |
| RWE Renewables Estonia 3 OÜ, Tallinn/Estonia | 100 | 32 | - | |
| RWE Renewables Estonia 4 OÜ, Tallinn/Estonia | 100 | 32 | - | |
| RWE Renewables Estonia 5 OÜ, Tallinn/Estonia | 100 | 32 | - | |
| RWE Renewables Estonia 6 OÜ, Tallinn/Estonia | 100 | 32 | - | |
| RWE Renewables Estonia 7 OÜ, Tallinn/Estonia | 100 | 32 | - | |
| RWE Renewables Estonia 8 OÜ, Tallinn/Estonia | 100 | 32 | - | |
| RWE Renewables Estonia 9 OÜ, Tallinn/Estonia | 100 | 32 | - | |
| RWE Renewables Estonia OÜ, Tallinn/Estonia | 100 | 4 | $-24$ | |
| RWE Renewables Finland Oy AB, Helsinki/Finland | 100 | 85 | $-115$ | |
| RWE Renewables India Private Limited, Mumbai/India | 100 | 64 | $-456$ | |
| RWE Renewables Inversiones Latinoamericana S.L., Barcelona/Spain | 100 | 96 | $-10$ | |
| RWE Renewables InvestCo B.V., Geertruidenberg/Netherlands | 100 | $-1$ | - | |
| RWE Renewables Mexico, S. de R.L. de C.V., Mexico City/Mexico | 100 | - | - | |
| RWE Renewables Offshore Development One GmbH, Essen | 100 | 25 | $-1$ | |
| RWE Renewables Offshore HoldCo Four GmbH, Essen | 100 | 25 | $-1$ | |
| RWE RENEWABLES PROYECTO RENOVABLE 1, S.L.U., Barcelona/Spain | 100 | 199 | $-7$ | |
| RWE RENEWABLES PROYECTO RENOVABLE 2, S.L.U., Barcelona/Spain | 100 | 342 | $-7$ | |
| RWE Renewables Services GmbH, Essen | 100 | 25 | $-1$ |
[^0]
[^0]: 1 Profit and loss-pooling agreement.
2 Figures from the Group's consolidated financial statements.
3 Newly founded, Financial statements not yet available.
4 Control by virtue of company contract.
5 No control by virtue of company contract.
6 Significant influence via indirect investments.
7 Significant influence by virtue of company contract.
8 No significant influence by virtue of company contract.
| II. Affiliated companies which are not included in the consolidated financial statements due to secondary importance for the assets, liabilities, financial position and profit or loss of the Group | Shareholding in \% | Equity | Net income / loss | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Direct | Total | $€^{\prime} 000$ | $€^{\prime} 000$ | |
| RWE Renewables Services Mexico, S. de R.L. de C.V., Mexico City/Mexico | 100 | - | - | |
| RWE Renewables Sweden Development AB, Malmo//Sweden | 100 | - | $-^{3}$ | |
| RWE Renewables Sweden Operation AB, Malmo//Sweden | 100 | - | $-^{3}$ | |
| RWE Renewables Sweden Services AB, Malmo//Sweden | 100 | - | $-^{3}$ | |
| RWE Renewables UK Sporeco Limited, Swindon/United Kingdom | 100 | - | - | |
| RWE Renewables UK Zone Six Limited, Swindon/United Kingdom | 100 | - | - | |
| RWE Renewables Wind Project Offshore AB, Malmo//Sweden | 100 | 2 | - | |
| RWE Renewables Zweite Beteiligungs GmbH, Essen | 100 | - | $-^{3}$ | |
| RWEST PI FRE Holding LLC, New York City/USA | 100 | 3 | $-15$ | |
| RWE Supply \& Trading Australia Pty Ltd, Melbourne/Australia | 100 | - | $-^{3}$ | |
| RWE Supply \& Trading CZ, o.s., Prague/Czechia | 100 | 268,673 | 8,104 | |
| RWE Supply \& Trading (India) Private Limited, Mumbai/India | 100 | 953 | 127 | |
| RWE Supply \& Trading Services CZ s.r.o., Prague/Czechia | 100 | 1,632 | 139 | |
| RWE SUPPLY TRADING TURKEY ENERJI ANONIM SIRKETI, Istanbul/Turkiye | 100 | 320 | 28 | |
| RWE Supply \& Trading US, LLC, Chicago/USA | 100 | - | - | |
| RWE TECNOLOGIA LTDA, Rio de Janeiro/Brazil | 100 | 70 | $-12$ | |
| RWE Trading Services Australia Pty Ltd, Melbourne/Australia | 100 | 1,111 | $-83$ | |
| RWE Trading Services Limited, Swindon/United Kingdom | 100 | 884 | 11 | |
| RWE \& Turcos Dogolgaz Itholot ve Ihracot A.S., Istanbul/Turkiye | 100 | 481 | 61 | |
| RWE Utsira Wind Services AS, Oslo/Norway | 100 | 1 | $-8$ | |
| RWE Wind Holding A/S, Copenhagen/Denmark | 100 | 657 | 17 | |
| RWE Windpark Bedburg A44n Verwaltungs GmbH, Bedburg | 100 | 49 | 7 | |
| RWE Windpark Bedburg Verwaltungs GmbH, Bedburg | 51 | 51 | 1 | |
| RWE Windpark Garzweiler Verwaltungs GmbH, Essen | 100 | 16 | $-4$ | |
| RWE Windpark Popenhagen GmbH \& Co. KG, Hanover | 100 | 507 | $-31$ |
[^0]
[^0]: 1 Profit and loss-pooling agreement.
2 Figures from the Group's consolidated financial statements.
3 Newly founded, financial statements not yet available.
4 Control by virtue of company contract.
5 No control by virtue of company contract.
6 Significant influence via indirect investments.
7 Significant influence by virtue of company contract.
8 No significant influence by virtue of company contract.
| II. Affiliated companies which are not included in the consolidated financial statements due to secondary importance for the assets, liabilities, financial position and profit or loss of the Group | Shareholding in \% | Equity | Net income / loss | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Direct | Total | $€^{\prime} 000$ | $€^{\prime} 000$ | |
| RWE Windpark Popenhagen Verwaltungs GmbH, Hanover | 100 | 62 | 8 | |
| RWE Wind Service Italia S.r.l., Rome/Italy | 100 | 448 | 87 | |
| RWE Wind Services Estonia OU, Tallinn/Estonia | 100 | $-445$ | $-945$ | |
| RWE Wind Services Norway AS, Oslo/Norway | 100 | $-1,444$ | $-198$ | |
| RWE Wind Transmission AB, Malmö/Sweden | 100 | 16 | - | |
| Sand Dune BESS, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | - | $-^{3}$ | |
| Sculpin Solar LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | - | $-^{3}$ | |
| Sergenite Investments Sp. z o.o. w likwidacji, Slupsk/Poland | 100 | $-1$ | $-6$ | |
| Sharco Wind sp. z o.o. w likwidacji, Slupsk/Poland | 100 | $-2$ | $-6$ | |
| Shay Solar, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | - | - | |
| Sisal Recursos Ambientales, S. de R.L. de C.V., Mexico City/Mexico | 100 | - | - | |
| Snow Shoe Wind Farm, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | - | - | |
| Solar PV Construction Poland sp. z o.o., Warsaw/Poland | 100 | $-315$ | $-56$ | |
| Southington CTA, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | - | $-^{3}$ | |
| South Pork Battery Storage, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | - | $-^{3}$ | |
| Sparta North, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | - | - | |
| Sparta South, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | - | - | |
| SRS EcoTherm GmbH, Solzbergen | 90 | 28,247 | 3,259 | |
| Stodola BESS, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | - | - | |
| Stoneridge Class B, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | - | $-^{3}$ | |
| Stoneridge Holdco, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | - | $-^{3}$ | |
| Storage Facility 1 Ltd., Swindon/United Kingdom | 100 | $-2$ | - | |
| Sugar Maple Wind, LLC, Chicago/USA | 100 | - | - | |
| Sunflower Holdco II, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | - | $-^{3}$ | |
| Sunrise Wind Holdings, LLC, Chicago/USA | 100 | - | - |
[^0]
[^0]: 1 Profit and loss-pooling agreement.
2 Figures from the Group's consolidated financial statements.
3 Newly founded, financial statements not yet available.
4 Control by virtue of company contract.
5 No control by virtue of company contract.
6 Significant influence via indirect investments.
7 Significant influence by virtue of company contract.
8 No significant influence by virtue of company contract.
| II. Affiliated companies which are not included in the consolidated financial statements due to secondary importance for the assets, liabilities, financial position and profit or loss of the Group | Shareholding in \% | Equity | Net income / loss | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Direct | Total | $€^{\prime} 000$ | $€^{\prime} 000$ | |
| Tecolote Recursos Ambientales, S. de R.L. de C.V., Mexico City/Mexico | 100 | - | - | |
| TEP Financing Eight Class B, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | - | $-^{3}$ | |
| TEP Financing Eight, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | - | $-^{3}$ | |
| Teporingo Recursos Ambientales, S. de R.L. de C.V., Mexico City/Mexico | 100 | - | - | |
| Tepazan Recursos Ambientales, S. de R.L. de C.V., Mexico City/Mexico | 100 | - | - | |
| Terrapin Hills LLC, Chicago/USA | 100 | - | - | |
| Theodore Energy Development Pty. Ltd., Melbourne/Australia | 100 | - | $-^{3}$ | |
| Theodore Energy Holding Pty. Ltd., Melbourne/Australia | 100 | - | $-^{3}$ | |
| Three Rocks Solar, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | - | - | |
| Tierra Blanca Wind Farm, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | - | - | |
| Tika Solar, S. de R.L. de C.V., Mexico City/Mexico | 100 | - | - | |
| Tipton Wind, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | - | - | |
| Todd Solar Farm, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | - | - | |
| Torrontes Sp. z o.o. w likwidacji, Warsaw/Poland | 100 | 24 | $-10$ | |
| Trink Security Assets, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | - | $-^{3}$ | |
| Valverde Wind Farm, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | - | - | |
| VDE Komplementär GmbH, Hanover | 100 | 13 | $-2$ | |
| Venado Wind Farm, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | - | - | |
| Ventus Victoria Offshore Wind Holding Pty. Ltd, Melbourne/Australia | 100 | - | - | |
| Ventus Victoria Offshore Wind Pty. Ltd, Melbourne/Australia | 100 | - | - | |
| Versorium Energy (GP) Ltd., Calgary/Canada | 95 | $-1$ | - | |
| Versorium Energy LP, Calgary/Canada | 93 | 24,809 | $-1,334$ | |
| Vici Wind Farm III, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | - | - | |
| Vici Wind Farm II, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | - | - | |
| Vici Wind Farm, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | - | - |
[^0]
[^0]: 1 Profit and loss-pooling agreement.
2 Figures from the Group's consolidated financial statements.
3 Newly founded, financial statements not yet available.
4 Control by virtue of company contract.
5 No control by virtue of company contract.
6 Significant influence via indirect investments.
7 Significant influence by virtue of company contract.
8 No significant influence by virtue of company contract.
| II. Affiliated companies which are not included in the consolidated financial statements due to secondary importance for the assets, liabilities, financial position and profit or loss of the Group | Shareholding in \% | Equity | Net income / loss | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Direct | Total | $€^{\prime} 000$ | $€^{\prime} 000$ | |
| Villarrobledo Desarrollo 2, S.L.U., Barcelona/Spain | 100 | 998 | $-15$ | |
| Vindkraftpark Aurvandil AB, Malmo̊/Sweden | 100 | 655 | $-1$ | |
| Vortex Energy Deutschland GmbH i.L., Kassel | 100 | 3,510 | $-10$ | |
| Walker Road Solar Farm, LLC, Lake Mary/USA | 100 | - | - | |
| Waynesboro VAB, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | - | - | |
| West Fork Solar, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | - | - | |
| Weyers Cave VAA, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | - | - | |
| Wildcat Wind Farm III, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | - | - | |
| Wildcat Wind Farm II, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | - | - | |
| WIT Ranch Wind Farm, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | - | - | |
| Wythe BESS, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | - | - ${ }^{4}$ | |
| Xolo Recursos Ambientales, S. de R.L. de C.V., Mexico City/Mexico | 100 | - | - | |
| Yellow Bell Solar, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | - | - |
[^0]
[^0]: 1 Profit and loss-pooling agreement.
2 Figures from the Group's consolidated financial statements.
3 Newly founded, Financial statements not yet available.
4 Control by virtue of company contract.
5 No control by virtue of company contract.
6 Significant influence via indirect investments.
7 Significant influence by virtue of company contract.
8 No significant influence by virtue of company contract.
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | RWE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| To our investors | Combined management report | Consolidated financial statements List of Shareholdings (part of the Notes) | Notes from the auditor | Responsibility statement | Further information | Annual Report 2024 |
| III. Joint operations | Shareholding in \% | Equity | Net income / loss | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Direct | Total | $€^{\prime} 000$ | $€^{\prime} 000$ | |
| Greater Gabbard Offshore Winds Limited, Reading/United Kingdom | 50 | 809,233 | 172,307 | |
| N.V. Elektriciteits Produktiemaatschappij Zuid-Nederland EPZ, Borssele/Netherlands | 30 | 100,792 | 6,609 |
| IV. Affiliated companies of joint operations | Shareholding in \% | Equity | Net income / loss | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Direct | Total | $€^{\prime} 000$ | $€^{\prime} 000$ | |
| Enzee B.V., Borssele/Netherlands | 100 | 892 | 133 |
[^0]
[^0]: 1 Profit and loss-pooling agreement.
2 Figures from the Group's consolidated financial statements.
3 Newly founded, financial statements not yet available.
4 Control by virtue of company contract.
5 No control by virtue of company contract.
6 Significant influence via indirect investments.
7 Significant influence by virtue of company contract.
8 No significant influence by virtue of company contract.
| V. Joint ventures accounted for using the equity method | Shareholding in \% | Equity | Net income /loss | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Direct | Total | $€^{\prime} 000$ | $€^{\prime} 000$ | ||
| AS 3 Beteiligungs GmbH, Essen | $51^{5}$ | 21,913 | 1,895 | ||
| AWE-Arkona-Windpark Entwicklungs-GmbH, Hamburg | 50 | 861,315 | 144,904 | ||
| Awel y Mör Offshore Wind Farm Limited, Swindon/United Kingdom | $60^{5}$ | 68,394 | $-41$ | ||
| Community Offshore Wind, LLC, Wilmington/USA | $73^{5}$ | - | - | ||
| C-Power N.V., Oostende/Belgium | 27 | 290,674 | 32,690 | ||
| Galloper Wind Farm Holding Company Limited, Swindon/United Kingdom | 25 | 100,186 | 134,124 | ||
| Grøndview Wind Farm, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 50 | - | - | ||
| Gwynt y Mör Offshore Wind Farm Limited, Swindon/United Kingdom | 50 | $-3,729$ | - | ||
| Meton Energy S.A., Maroussi/Greece | $51^{5}$ | 154,461 | 1,147 | ||
| Murakami Tainai Offshore Wind Co., Ltd., Tokyo/Japan | 40 | - | $-^{3}$ | ||
| Oranje Wind Power II C.V., Geertruidenberg/Netherlands | 50 | $-3,155$ | $-3,255$ | ||
| Parc Ealien Du Coupru SAS, Béziers/France | 50 | 940 | 899 | ||
| Parc Ealien Du Vilpion SAS, Béziers/France | 50 | $-15$ | 84 | ||
| Rampion Extension Development Limited, Swindon/United Kingdom | 50 | 39,228 | 36 | ||
| RWE Venture Capital GmbH, Essen | $75^{5}$ | 329 | $-65$ | ||
| Société Electrique de l'Our S.A., Luxembourg/Luxembourg | 40 | 40,504 | 2,044 | ||
| TCP Petcoke Corporation, Dover/USA | 50 | 35,902 | $-376^{2}$ | ||
| URANIT GmbH, Jülich | 50 | 72,312 | 98,279 |
[^0]
[^0]: 1 Profit and loss-pooling agreement.
2 Figures from the Group's consolidated financial statements.
3 Newly founded, Financial statements not yet available.
4 Control by virtue of company contract.
5 No control by virtue of company contract.
6 Significant influence vio indirect investments.
7 Significant influence by virtue of company contract.
8 No significant influence by virtue of company contract.
| VI. Associates accounted for using the equity method | Shareholding in \% | Equity | Net income / loss | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Direct | Total | $€^{\prime} 000$ | $€^{\prime} 000$ | ||
| Amprion GmbH, Dortmund | 25 | 25 | 2,785,300 | 293,200 | |
| DOTI Deutsche Offshore-Testfeld- und Infrastruktur-GmbH \& Co. KG, Oldenburg | 26 | 21,565 | $-38,578$ | ||
| GNS Gesellschaft für Nuklear-Service mbH, Essen | 28 | 39,242 | 6,904 | ||
| Grosskraftwerk Mannheim Aktiengesellschaft, Mannheim | 40 | 160,669 | 6,647 | ||
| Kärntner Energieholding Beteiligungs GmbH, Klagenfurt/Austria | 49 | 1,659,328 | 463,202 | ||
| KELAG-Kärntner Elektrizitäts-AG, Klagenfurt/Austria | $13^{5}$ | 1,656,369 | 462,826 | ||
| Magicat Holdco, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 20 | 267,866 | $-2,307$ | ||
| Mingos-Power GmbH, Essen | 40 | 5,297 | 4,628 | ||
| Nysöter Wind AB, Malmö/Sweden | 20 | 12,243 | $-16,054$ | ||
| PEARL PETROLEUM COMPANY LIMITED, Road Town/British Virgin Islands | $10^{7}$ | 2,517,932 | 409,288 | ||
| Rodsand 2 Offshore Wind Form AB, Malmo//Sweden | 20 | 169,213 | 42,682 | ||
| Schluchseewerk Aktiengesellschaft, Loufenburg Baden | 50 | 73,384 | 2,809 | ||
| Vela Wind Holdco, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 25 | 848,377 | 120 |
[^0]
[^0]: 1 Profit and loss-pooling agreement.
2 Figures from the Group's consolidated financial statements.
3 Newly founded, Financial statements not yet available.
4 Control by virtue of company contract.
5 No control by virtue of company contract.
6 Significant influence via indirect investments.
7 Significant influence by virtue of company contract.
8 No significant influence by virtue of company contract.


| 1 To our investors |
Combined management report | Consolidated financial statements List of Shareholdings (part of the Notes) | Notes from the auditor | Responsibility statement | Further information | RWE Annual Report 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VIII. Other investments | Shareholding in \% | Equity | Net income / loss | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Direct | Total | $€^{\prime} 000$ | $€^{\prime} 000$ | |
| APEP Dochfonds GmbH \& Co. KG i.L., Munich | 36 | 36 | $-798,062$ | $-1,780$ |
| BitOoda Holdings, Inc., Greenwich/USA | 5 | 7,446 | $-2,578$ | |
| Chrysalix Energy III U.S. Limited Partnership, Vancouver/Canada | 5 | 78,033 | $-4,079$ | |
| Chrysalix Energy II U.S. Limited Partnership, Vancouver/Canada | 6 | 13,961 | $-20,877$ | |
| Elexon Limited, London/United Kingdom | 8 | - | - | |
| Energias Renovables de Ávila, S.A., Madrid/Spain | 17 | - | - | |
| E.ON SE, Essen | 15 | 12,359,100 | 1,952,600 | |
| German LNG Terminal GmbH, Brunsbüttel | 10 | 152,505 | $-4,127$ | |
| Heliotek GmbH, Dresden | 1 | 49,103 | $-44,898$ | |
| High-Tech Gründerfonds II GmbH \& Co. KG, Bonn | 1 | 82,048 | $-120$ | |
| HOCHTEMPERATUR-KERNKRAFTWERK Gesellschaft mit beschränkter Haftung (HKG) | ||||
| Gemeinsames Europäisches Unternehmen, Hamm | $31^{a}$ | $-894,275$ | $-4,077$ | |
| Nordsee One GmbH, Oststeinbek | 15 | 179,302 | 52,047 | |
| Parque Eólico Cassiopea, S.L., Oviedo/Spain | 10 | 45 | $-14$ | |
| Parque Eólico Escorpio, S.A., Oviedo/Spain | 10 | 2,346 | $-27$ | |
| Parque Eólico Leo, S.L., Oviedo/Spain | 10 | 268 | $-10$ | |
| PEAG Holding GmbH, Dortmund | 12 | 12 | 17,954 | $-266$ |
| Promocion y Gestion Cáncer, S.L., Oviedo/Spain | 10 | 69 | $-9$ | |
| Q-Portal GmbH, Grevenbroich | 10 | 1,570 | $-643$ | |
| Renercycle S.L., Pamplona/Spain | 16 | 2,152 | $-208$ | |
| Ryse Energy Holdings Limited, Abu Dhabi/United Arab Emirates | 14 | 6,514 | $-957$ | |
| SET Fund II C.V., Amsterdam/Netherlands | 6 | 6,585 | $-4,631$ | |
| Sustainable Energy Technology Fund C.V., Amsterdam/Netherlands | $44^{a}$ | 13,616 | $-10,274$ |
[^0]
[^0]: 1 Profit and loss-pooling agreement.
2 Figures from the Group's consolidated financial statements.
3 Newly founded, Financial statements not yet available.
4 Control by virtue of company contract.
5 No control by virtue of company contract.
6 Significant influence vio indirect investments.
7 Significant influence by virtue of company contract.
8 No significant influence by virtue of company contract.

| Changes in shoreholding with change of control | Shoreholding in \% 31 Dec 2024 | Shoreholding in \% 31 Dec 2023 | Change | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Additions to affiliated companies included in the consolidated financial statements | |||||
| Blue Rock Solar, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | - | 100 | ||
| Crowned Heron 2, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | - | 100 | ||
| Honey Mesquite Wind Farm, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | - | 100 | ||
| NB HoldCo Limited, Swindon/United Kingdom | 100 | - | 100 | ||
| NB TopCo Limited, Swindon/United Kingdom | 100 | - | 100 | ||
| Norfolk Boreas Limited, Swindon/United Kingdom | 100 | - | 100 | ||
| Norfolk Vanguard East Limited, Swindon/United Kingdom | 100 | - | 100 | ||
| Norfolk Vanguard West Limited, Swindon/United Kingdom | 100 | - | 100 | ||
| NVE HoldCo Limited, Swindon/United Kingdom | 100 | - | 100 | ||
| NVE TopCo Limited, Swindon/United Kingdom | 100 | - | 100 | ||
| NVW HoldCo Limited, Swindon/United Kingdom | 100 | - | 100 | ||
| NVW TopCo Limited, Swindon/United Kingdom | 100 | - | 100 | ||
| R3 Renewables II, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 75 | - | 75 | ||
| RWE Cleon Energy DCE Development, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | - | 100 | ||
| RWE Cleon Energy DCE Holdco, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | - | 100 | ||
| RWE Cleon Energy DCE Operations, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | - | 100 | ||
| RWE Cleon Energy, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | - | 100 | ||
| RWE Investco EPC Mgmt 2, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | - | 100 | ||
| RWE Supply \& Trading Americas Holdings, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | - | 100 | ||
| Sunflower Holdco I, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | - | 100 | ||
| TEP Financing Seven Class B, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | - | 100 | ||
| TEP Financing Seven, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | - | 100 | ||
| TEP Financing Six Class B, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | - | 100 | ||
| TEP Financing Six, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | - | 100 | ||
| Union Ridge Solar, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | - | 100 |
| Changes in shoreholding with change of control | Shareholding in \% 31 Dec 2024 | Shareholding in \% 31 Dec 2023 | Change | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Additions to affiliated companies included in the consolidated financial statements | ||||
| Westminster Reliability Project LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | - | 100 | |
| Westside Canal 2A, LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | - | 100 | |
| Yellow Cat Wind LLC, Wilmington/USA | 100 | - | 100 |
| Changes in shoreholding with change of control | Shareholding in \% 31 Dec 2024 |
Shareholding in \% 31 Dec 2023 |
Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Additions to joint ventures accounted for using the equity method | |||
| Murakami Tainai Offshore Wind Co., Ltd., Tokyo/Jiapan | 40 | - | 40 |
| Changes in shoreholding with change of control | Shareholding in \% 31 Dec 2024 |
Shareholding in \% 31 Dec 2023 |
Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Disposal of affiliated companies included in the consolidated financial statements | |||
| JBM Solar Projects 16 Ltd., London/United Kingdom | - | 100 | -100 |
| JBM Solar Projects 42 Ltd., London/United Kingdom | - | 100 | -100 |
| JBM Solar Projects 43 Ltd., London/United Kingdom | - | 100 | -100 |
| JBM Solar Projects 44 Ltd., London/United Kingdom | - | 100 | -100 |
| JBM Solar Projects 45 Ltd., London/United Kingdom | - | 100 | -100 |
| Rampion Renewables Limited, Swindon/United Kingdom | - | 100 | -100 |
| RWE Offshore Wind Netherlands Participations V B.V., Geertruidenberg/Netherlands | - | 100 | -100 |
| RWE Offshore Wind Netherlands Participations VI B.V., Geertruidenberg/Netherlands | - | 100 | -100 |
| South Boston VAB, LLC, Wilmington/USA | - | 100 | -100 |
| Changes in shareholding with change of control | Shareholding in \% 31 Dec 2024 |
Shareholding in \% 31 Dec 2023 |
Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Change from affiliated companies which are included in the consolidated financial statements to joint ventures accounted for using the equity method | |||
| Oranje Wind Power II C.V., Geertruidenberg/Netherlands | 50 | 100 | -50 |
| Changes in shareholding with change of control | Shareholding in \% 31 Dec 2024 |
Shareholding in \% 31 Dec 2023 |
Change |
| Change from affiliated companies which are included in the consolidated financial statements to companies which are not accounted for using the equity method due to secondary importance for the assets, liabilities, financial position and profit or loss of the Group | |||
| Oranje Wind Power II B.V., Geertruidenberg/Netherlands | 50 | 100 | -50 |
| Changes in shareholding without change of control | Shareholding in \% 31 Dec 2024 |
Shareholding in \% 31 Dec 2023 |
Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Affiliated companies which are included in the consolidated financial statements | |||
| RWE \& Turcos Güney Elektrik Üretim A.S., Ankara/Türkiye | 70 | 70 | - |
| RWE Neuland Erneuerbare Energien GmbH \& Co. KG, Essen | 51 | 100 | -49 |
| RWE Renewables UK Dogger Bank South (East) Limited, Swindon/United Kingdom | 51 | 100 | -49 |
| RWE Renewables UK Dogger Bank South (West) Limited, Swindon/United Kingdom | 51 | 100 | -49 |
As of 27 February 2025
Dr. Werner Brandt
Bad Homburg
Chairman
Member of the Supervisory Board of Siemens AG
Year of birth: 1954
Member since 18 April 2013
End of term: 2025
Other appointments:
Hanover
Deputy Chairman
Former Deputy Chairman of IGBCE
Year of birth: 1961
Member since 1 July 2014
End of term: 2026
Other appointments:
Königswinter
Chairman of the Supervisory Board of
Deutsche Telekom AG
Year of birth: 1961
Member since 3 May 2024
End of term: 2027
Other appointments:
Michael Bochinsky ${ }^{2}$
Grevenbroich
Deputy Chairman of the General Works
Council of RWE Power AG
Year of birth: 1967
Member since 1 August 2018
End of term: 2026
Other appointments:
Duisburg
Chairwoman of the Works Council of RWE AG,
Representative of the disabled
Year of birth: 1965
Member since 20 April 2016
End of term: 2026
Mülheim an der Ruhr
Independent Corporate Consultant
Year of birth: 1964
Member since 28 April 2021
End of term: 2025
Heimbach
Chairman of the Works Council of the Hambach
Opencast Mine, RWE Power AG
Year of birth: 1987
Member since 30 September 2019
End of term: 2026
Bielefeld
General Partner at Dr. August Oetker KG
Year of birth: 1968
Member since 27 April 2017
End of term: 2027
Other appointments:
Prof. Dr.-Ing. Dr.-Ing. E.h. Hans-Peter Keitel Essen
Former Chairman of the Executive Board of HOCHTIEF AG
Independent Corporate Consultant
Year of birth: 1947
Member from 18 April 2013 to 3 May 2024
Krumpendorf, Austria
Independent Corporate Consultant
Year of birth: 1957
Member since 15 October 2016
End of term: 2025
Other appointments:
Thomas Kufen
Essen
Mayor of the City of Essen
Year of birth: 1973
Member since 18 October 2021
End of term: 2025
Other appointments:
[^0]
[^0]: 1 Listed company.
2 Employee representative.
3 Office within the Group.
Reiner van Limbeck ${ }^{2}$
Dinslaken
Chairman of the Works Council of the Essen Headquarters, RWE Generation SE and RWE Technology International GmbH
Year of birth: 1965
Member since 15 September 2021
End of term: 2026
Other appointments:
Harald Louis ${ }^{2}$
Jülich
Chairman of the General Works Council of RWE Power AG
Year of birth: 1967
Member since 20 April 2016
End of term: 2026
Other appointments:
Dagmar Paasch ${ }^{2}$
Solingen
Regional Head of the Financial Services, Communication, Technology, Culture, Supply and Waste Management Division at ver.di NRW
Year of birth: 1974
Member since 15 September 2021
End of term: 2026
Other appointments:
Prof. Jörg Rocholl, PhD
Berlin
President of the European School of Management and Technology (ESMT Berlin)
Year of birth: 1973
Member since 3 May 2024
End of term: 2027
Dr. Erhard Schipporeit
Hamburg
Independent Corporate Consultant
Year of birth: 1949
Member from 20 April 2016 to 3 May 2024
Other appointments:
Dirk Schumacher ${ }^{2}$
Rommerskirchen
Chairman of the HW Grefrath / Workshops Works Council, RWE Power AG
Year of birth: 1970
Member since 15 September 2021
End of term: 2026
Dortmund
Independent Consultant for Companies, Administrations, Political Parties and Civil Society Initiatives
Year of birth: 1956
Member from 20 April 2011 to 3 May 2024
[^0]
[^0]: 1 Listed company.
2 Employee representative.
3 Office within the Group.
Königstein
Member of the Executive Board of Volkswagen AG
Year of birth: 1967
Member since 28 April 2021
End of term: 2025
Other appointments:
Birkerœd, Denmark
Managing Partner, IBM Consulting EMEA,
IBM Corporation
Year of birth: 1967
Member since 28 April 2021
End of term: 2025
Other appointments:
Grevenbroich
Head of Drilling and Water Management, RWE Power AG
Year of birth: 1967
Member since 15 September 2021
End of term: 2026
Dormagen
Assistant to the Senior Vice President Corporate
Legal of GEA Group AG
Year of birth: 1975
Member since 20 April 2016
End of term: 2026
Dortmund
Mayor of the City of Dortmund
Year of birth: 1967
Member since 3 May 2024
End of term: 2027
Other appointments:
[^0]
[^0]: 1 Listed company.
2 Employee representative.
3 Office within the Group.
Executive Committee of the Supervisory Board
Dr. Werner Brandt (Chairman)
Dr. Frank Appel
Ute Gerbaulet
Reiner van Limbeck
Dirk Schumacher
Ralf Sikorski
Paragraph 3 of the German Co-Determination Act
Dr. Werner Brandt (Chairman)
Thomas Kufen
Ralf Sikorski
Marion Weckes
Dr. Werner Brandt (Chairman)
Dr. Frank Appel
Sandra Bossemeyer
Harald Louis
Ralf Sikorski
Hauke Stars
Mag. Dr. h.c. Monika Kircher (Chairwoman)
Michael Bochinsky
Dr. Hans Friedrich Bünting
Matthias Dürbaum
Dagmar Paasch
Thomas Westphal
Dr. Frank Appel (Chairman since 3 May 2024)
Dr. Werner Brandt (Chairman until 3 May 2024)
Thomas Kufen
Hauke Stars
Strategy and Sustainability Committee
Dr. Werner Brandt (Chairman)
Dr. Frank Appel
Michael Bochinsky
Dr. Hans Friedrich Bünting
Harald Louis
Dagmar Paasch
Ralf Sikorski
Helle Valentin
Chief Executive Officer since 1 May 2021
Member of the Executive Board of RWE AG since 1 October 2016, appointed until 30 June 2026
Group departments:
Other appointments:
Non-Executive Member of the Board of Directors² (Chairman)
Chief Financial Officer since 1 May 2021
Member of the Executive Board of RWE AG since 1 November 2020, appointed until 31 October 2028
Group departments:
Other appointments:
Non-Executive Member of the Board of Directors²
1 Listed company.
2 Office within the Group.
Chief Human Resources Officer and Labour Director since 1 August 2023
Member of the Executive Board of RWE AG since 1 August 2023, appointed until 31 July 2026
Group departments:
Other appointments:
Non-Executive Member of the Board of Directors²
4.1 Independent auditor's report ..... 353
4.2 Information on the auditor ..... 364
4.3 Assurance report in relation to the Group Sustainability Statement ..... 365
We have audited the consolidated financial statements of RWE Aktiengesellschaft, Essen / Germany, and its subsidiaries (the Group), which comprise the consolidated balance sheet as at 31 December 2024, the consolidated income statement, the consolidated statement of comprehensive income, the consolidated statement of changes in equity and the consolidated cash flow statement for the financial year from 1 January to 31 December 2024, and the notes to the consolidated financial statements, including material accounting policy information. In addition, we have audited the combined management report for the Parent and the Group of RWE Aktiengesellschaft, Essen / Germany, for the financial year from 1 January to 31 December 2024. In accordance with the German legal requirements, we have not audited the content of the group sustainability report included in the combined management report, as well as the corporate governance statement pursuant to Section 289f and 315d German Commercial Code (HGB), which is referenced in the "Notes to the financial statements of RWE AG (holding company)" section of the combined management report. In addition, we have not audited the content of the passages extraneous to combined management reports and disclosures of the combined management report that are marked as unaudited.
In our opinion, on the basis of the knowledge obtained in the audit,
Pursuant to Section 322 (3) sentence 1 HGB, we declare that our audit has not led to any reservations relating to the legal compliance of the consolidated financial statements and of the combined management report.
We conducted our audit of the consolidated financial statements and of the combined management report in accordance with Section 317 HGB and the EU Audit Regulation (No. 537/2014; referred to subsequently as "EU Audit Regulation") and in compliance with German Generally Accepted Standards for Financial Statement Audits promulgated by the Institut der Wirtschaftsprüfer (IDW). We performed the audit of the consolidated financial statements in supplementary compliance with the International Standards on Auditing (ISA). Our responsibilities under those requirements, principles and standards are further described in the "Auditor's Responsibilities for the Audit of the Consolidated Financial Statements and of the Combined Management Report" section of our auditor's report. We are independent of the group entities in accordance with the requirements of European law and German commercial and professional law, and we have fulfilled our other German professional responsibilities in accordance with these requirements. In addition, in accordance with Article 10 (2) point (f) of the EU Audit Regulation, we declare that we have not provided non-audit services prohibited under Article 5 (1) of the EU Audit Regulation. We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our audit opinions on the consolidated financial statements and on the combined management report.
Key audit matters are those matters that, in our professional judgement, were of most significance in our audit of the consolidated financial statements for the financial year from 1 January to 31 December 2024. These matters were addressed in the context of our audit of the consolidated financial statements as a whole and in forming our audit opinion thereon; we do not provide a separate audit opinion on these matters.
In the following, we present the key audit matters we have determined in the course of our audit:
Our presentation of these key audit matters has been structured as follows:
description
(including reference to corresponding information in the consolidated financial statements)
auditor's response
In the consolidated financial statements of RWE Aktiengesellschaft as at 31 December 2024, the "Intangible assets" balance sheet item includes goodwill of mEUR 4,596, which represents about $4.7 \%$ of total assets and $13.7 \%$ of the Group's balance sheet equity.
Goodwill is tested for impairment at least once a year as at 31 December or when there are indications that goodwill may be impaired. The impairment tests involve comparing the carrying amounts of the cash-generating units or groups of cashgenerating units (CGUs), including the goodwill allocated to them, with the recoverable amounts, i.e. the higher of fair value less costs of disposal or value in use. The recoverable amount as at the reporting date is calculated by discounting the projected cash flows using a calculation model (discounted cash flow method). The cash flow projections are based on the corporate planning for the CGUs, which in turn is the basis for the group planning for the next three years (medium-term planning) prepared by the executive directors, approved by the supervisory board and valid at the time of
the impairment test, as well as an extrapolation based on assumptions regarding long-term growth rates. Discounting is based on the CGUs' weighted average cost of capital. To determine the discount rates, the executive directors used, among other things, the work of an external expert they engaged. In the financial year 2024, no need for impairment was identified.
The result of this valuation is highly dependent on the assumptions made by the executive directors when determining future cash flows and the parameters for the discount rates used, and is therefore subject to considerable uncertainty. Against this background and due to the complexity of the valuation method applied, as well as the material significance of goodwill, this matter was particularly relevant in the context of our audit.
In the notes to the consolidated financial statements, the executive directors' disclosures on goodwill are included in note "(10) Intangible assets" of the "Notes to the Balance Sheet" section.
As part of our audit, we first gained an understanding of the process for performing the impairment tests of goodwill, as well as the accounting-related controls implemented in this process. In doing so, we verified the methodology used to perform the impairment tests, including the calculation of the weighted average cost of capital. We assessed the design of identified controls that were relevant to our audit and determined whether they had been properly implemented.
In the case of estimates made by the executive directors, we assessed the reasonableness of the methods applied, the assumptions made and the data used. In particular, we satisfied ourselves that the future cash flows used in the calculation models were appropriate. To do this, we verified, among other things, that these values were consistent with the values used in the medium-term planning prepared by the executive directors and approved by the supervisory board, and that the planning was consistent with general and industry-specific market expectations. We examined the parameters used to determine the discount rates applied and checked the calculation models used for factual and mathematical accuracy. We reviewed and used the work of the external expert engaged by the executive directors, taking into account our evaluation of this expert's competence, capabilities and objectivity. We also reviewed the sensitivity analyses performed by the executive directors. During our audit procedures, we received support from our internal valuation experts.
Finally, we verified that the disclosures relevant to the notes to the consolidated financial statements were complete and appropriate.
In the consolidated financial statements of RWE Aktiengesellschaft as at 31 December 2024, property, plant and equipment in the total amount of mEUR 38,458 is recognised, which represents about $39.1 \%$ of total assets and $114.4 \%$ of the Group's balance sheet equity.
The executive directors assess whether there are any indications of impairment of property, plant and equipment as at the reporting date using internal and external criteria. Such indications were identified in particular in the Onshore Wind/Solar and Offshore Wind segments for individual development projects in early stages of development. Due to the discontinuation of development work on these projects, the capitalised development costs were written off in full. In addition, indications of potential impairment were identified particularly in the Flexible Generation segment due to changes in the economic environment in the Netherlands and in the Offshore Wind segment due to declining feed-in tariffs in Germany, resulting in impairment tests being performed in the financial year. For this purpose, the recoverable amounts
of the property, plant and equipment concerned were determined on the basis of discounted cash flow models. The future cash flows used in the calculation models were based on the respective corporate planning, which in turn formed the basis for the group planning for the next three years (medium-term planning) prepared by the executive directors, approved by the supervisory board and valid at the time of the impairment tests. They were extrapolated on the basis of long-term assumptions regarding the price of electricity, natural gas and $\mathrm{CO}_{2}$ certificates. In the Flexible Generation segment, long-term assumptions regarding the planned service lives of the power plants were also taken into account. Discounting was based on the weighted average cost of capital. To determine the discount rates, the executive directors used, among other things, the work of an external expert they engaged.
The impairment test for property, plant and equipment revealed a need for impairment totalling mEUR 1,162, which was recognised under depreciation, amortization and impairment losses and was mostly attributable to the Flexible Generation segment in the Netherlands (mEUR 654), as well as Offshore Wind (mEUR 332).
The identification of indications of a possible impairment by the executive directors requires judgement. The result of impairment tests performed is highly dependent on the assumptions made by the executive directors when determining future cash flows and the parameters for the discount rates used, and is therefore subject to considerable uncertainty. Against this background and due to the complexity of the valuation method applied, as well as the material significance of property, plant and equipment, this matter was particularly relevant in the context of our audit.
In the notes to the consolidated financial statements, the executive directors' disclosures on property, plant and equipment and its measurement are included in note "(11) Property, plant and equipment" of the "Notes to the Balance Sheet" section and note "(5) Depreciation, amortisation and impairment losses" of the "Notes to the Income Statement" section.
As part of our audit of the recoverability of property, plant and equipment, we first verified the criteria used by the executive directors to identify indications of possible impairment and assessed whether these criteria were suitable for ensuring that all possible indications of impairments are identified. With regard to the planning process, we referred to our findings from the audit of the recoverability of goodwill. We examined whether the cash flows from the medium-term planning and the underlying corporate planning used to calculate the recoverable amounts were derived appropriately. In the case of estimates made by the executive directors, we assessed the reasonableness of the methods applied, the assumptions made and the data used. We also verified the appropriateness of the future cash flows used in the calculations by comparing them with general and industry-specific market expectations and, in the Flexible Generation segment, with the planned service lives of the power plants. We examined the parameters used to determine the discount rates applied and checked the calculation models used for factual and mathematical accuracy. We reviewed and used the work of the external expert engaged by the executive directors, taking into account our evaluation of this expert's competence, capabilities and objectivity. During our audit procedures, we received support from our internal valuation experts.
Finally, we verified that the disclosures relevant to the notes to the consolidated financial statements were complete and appropriate.
In the consolidated financial statements of RWE Aktiengesellschaft as at 31 December 2024, provisions for mining damage and provisions for nuclear waste management in the combined amount of mEUR 11,260 are recognised in the "Provisions" balance sheet item, representing about $11.4 \%$ of total assets.
The provisions are measured at the settlement amount. They are determined by first calculating the expected future payments at reporting date prices and escalating them using expected price increase rates. They are then discounted to the reporting date. The expected future payments are based, among other things, on the recultivation plans for opencast mines and cost estimates made by the executive directors for the residual operation and dismantling of nuclear power plant facilities as well as waste treatment. As part of their calculations, the executive directors used, among other things, the work of external experts they engaged.
The result of the valuation of the provisions is highly dependent on the planning assumptions and estimates made by the executive directors regarding the amount and timing of the expected future payments, as well as the escalation and discount rates used in the calculation models, and is therefore subject to significant uncertainty. Against this background and due to the complexity of the valuation method applied, as well as the material significance of the provisions for mining damage and nuclear waste management, this matter was particularly relevant in the context of our audit.
In the notes to the consolidated financial statements, the executive directors' disclosures on provisions are included in note "(22) Provisions" of the "Notes to the Balance Sheet" section.
As part of our audit, we first gained an understanding of the process for measuring the provisions and the accounting-related controls implemented in this process. In doing so, we verified the methodology used to perform the valuations in the calculation models applied, including the assumptions made and the data used, and assessed them in terms of their reasonableness. We assessed the design of identified controls that were relevant to our audit and determined whether they had been properly implemented. We compared the future payments used in the calculations with the projections and recultivation plans prepared by the executive directors and assessed their plausibility. For this purpose, we reviewed, and used within the scope of our audit, any relevant work of the external experts engaged by the executive directors that was used in the projections, taking into account our evaluation of these experts' competence, capabilities and objectivity. We assessed the discount rates used as well as the escalation rates applied in the inflation of the expected future payments by, among other things, comparing them with general and industry-specific market expectations, and also checked the calculation models used for factual and mathematical accuracy. During our audit procedures, we received support from our internal valuation experts.
Finally, we verified that the disclosures in the notes to the consolidated financial statements were complete and accurate.
The executive directors and / or the supervisory board are responsible for the other information. The other information comprises:
The supervisory board is responsible for the report of the supervisory board. The executive directors and the supervisory board are responsible for the statement according to Section 161 German Stock Corporation Act (AktG) concerning the German Corporate Governance Code, which is part of the corporate governance statement. Otherwise the executive directors are responsible for the other information.
Our audit opinions on the consolidated financial statements and on the combined management report do not cover the other information, and consequently we do not express an audit opinion or any other form of assurance conclusion thereon.
In connection with our audit, our responsibility is to read the other information identified above and, in doing so, to consider whether the other information
If, based on the work we have performed, we conclude that there is a material misstatement of this other information, we are required to report that fact. We have nothing to report in this regard.
The executive directors are responsible for the preparation of the consolidated financial statements that comply, in all material respects, with IFRS Accounting Standards as adopted by the EU and the additional requirements of German commercial law pursuant to Section 315e (1) HGB, and that the consolidated financial statements, in compliance with these requirements, give a true and fair view of the assets, liabilities, financial position and financial performance of the Group. In addition, the executive directors are responsible for such internal control as they have determined necessary to enable the preparation of consolidated financial statements that are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud (i.e. fraudulent financial reporting and misappropriation of assets) or error.
In preparing the consolidated financial statements, the executive directors are responsible for assessing the Group's ability to continue as a going concern. They also have the responsibility for disclosing, as applicable, matters related to going concern. In addition, they are responsible for financial reporting based on the going concern basis of accounting unless there is an intention to liquidate the Group or to cease operations, or there is no realistic alternative but to do so.
Furthermore, the executive directors are responsible for the preparation of the combined management report that as a whole provides an appropriate view of the Group's position and is, in all material respects, consistent with the consolidated financial statements, complies with German legal requirements, and appropriately presents the opportunities and risks of future development. In addition, the executive directors are responsible for such arrangements and measures (systems) as they have considered necessary to enable the preparation of a combined management report that is in accordance with the applicable German legal requirements, and to be able to provide sufficient appropriate evidence for the assertions in the combined management report.
The supervisory board is responsible for overseeing the Group's financial reporting process for the preparation of the consolidated financial statements and of the combined management report.
Our objectives are to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements as a whole are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error, and whether the combined management report as a whole provides an appropriate view of the Group's position and, in all material respects, is consistent with the consolidated financial statements and the knowledge obtained in the audit, complies with the German legal requirements and appropriately presents the opportunities and risks of
future development, as well as to issue an auditor's report that includes our audit opinions on the consolidated financial statements and on the combined management report.
Reasonable assurance is a high level of assurance, but is not a guarantee that an audit conducted in accordance with Section 317 HGB and the EU Audit Regulation and in compliance with German Generally Accepted Standards for Financial Statement Audits promulgated by the Institut der Wirtschaftsprüfer (IDW) and in supplementary compliance with the ISA will always detect a material misstatement. Misstatements can arise from fraud or error and are considered material if, individually or in the aggregate, they could reasonably be expected to influence the economic decisions of users taken on the basis of these consolidated financial statements and this combined management report.
We exercise professional judgement and maintain professional scepticism throughout the audit. We also
obtain an understanding of internal control relevant to the audit of the consolidated financial statements and of arrangements and measures relevant to the audit of the combined management report in order to design audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an audit opinion on the effectiveness of internal control or these arrangements and measures of the Group.
evaluate the appropriateness of accounting policies used by the executive directors and the reasonableness of estimates made by the executive directors and related disclosures.
We communicate with those charged with governance regarding, among other matters, the planned scope and timing of the audit and significant audit findings, including any significant deficiencies in internal control that we identify during our audit.
We provide those charged with governance with a statement that we have complied with the relevant independence requirements, and communicate with them all relationships and other matters that may reasonably be thought to bear on our independence, and where applicable, the actions taken or safeguards applied to eliminate independence threats.
From the matters communicated with those charged with governance, we determine those matters that were of most significance in the audit of the consolidated financial statements for the current period and are therefore the key audit matters. We describe these matters in the auditor's report unless law or regulation precludes public disclosure about the matter.
We have performed an audit in accordance with Section 317 (3a) HGB to obtain reasonable assurance whether the electronic reproductions of the consolidated financial statements and of the combined management report (hereinafter referred to as "ESEF documents") prepared for publication, contained in the file, which has the SHA-256 value 03060b03c76421c0f1f31a1ea8acfa298794346628c19c77202d710aaac367ba, meet, in all material respects, the requirements for the electronic reporting format pursuant to Section 328 (1) HGB ("ESEF format"). In accordance with the German legal requirements, this audit only covers the conversion of the information contained in the consolidated financial statements and the combined management report into the ESEF format, and therefore covers neither the information contained in these electronic reproductions nor any other information contained in the file identified above.
In our opinion, the electronic reproductions of the consolidated financial statements and of the combined management report prepared for publication contained in the file identified above meet, in all material respects, the requirements for the electronic reporting format pursuant to Section 328 (1) HGB. Beyond this audit opinion and our audit opinions on the accompanying consolidated financial statements and on the accompanying combined management report for the financial year from 1 January to 31 December 2024 contained in the "Report on the Audit of the Consolidated Financial Statements and of the Combined Management Report" above, we do not express any assurance opinion on the information contained within these electronic reproductions or on any other information contained in the file identified above.
We conducted our audit of the electronic reproductions of the consolidated financial statements and of the combined management report contained in the file identified above in accordance with Section 317 (3a) HGB and on the basis of the IDW Auditing Standard: Audit of the Electronic Reproductions of Financial Statements and Management Reports Prepared for Publication Purposes Pursuant to Section 317 (3a) HGB (IDW AuS 410 (06.2022)). Our responsibilities in this context are further described in the "Group Auditor's Responsibilities for the Audit of the ESEF Documents" section. Our audit firm has applied the requirements of the IDW Quality Management Standards.
The executive directors of the Parent are responsible for the preparation of the ESEF documents based on the electronic files of the consolidated financial statements and of the combined management report according to Section 328 (1) sentence 4 no. 1 HGB and for the tagging of the consolidated financial statements according to Section 328 (1) sentence 4 no. 2 HGB.
In addition, the executive directors of the Company are responsible for such internal control that they have considered necessary to enable the preparation of ESEF documents that are free from material intentional or unintentional non-compliance with the requirements for the electronic reporting format pursuant to Section 328 (1) HGB.
The supervisory board is responsible for overseeing the process for preparing the ESEF documents as part of the financial reporting process.
Group Auditor's Responsibilities for the Audit of the ESEF Documents
Our objective is to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the ESEF documents are free from material intentional or unintentional non-compliance with the requirements of Section 328 (1) HGB. We exercise professional judgement and maintain professional scepticism throughout the audit. We also
We were elected as group auditor by the general meeting on 3 May 2024. We were engaged by the supervisory board on 3 May 2024. We have been the group auditor of RWE Aktiengesellschaft, Essen / Germany, since the financial year 2024.
We declare that the audit opinions expressed in this auditor's report are consistent with the additional report to the audit committee pursuant to Article 11 of the EU Audit Regulation (long-form audit report).
In addition to the financial statement audit, we have provided to the audited Company or its controlled entities the following services that are not disclosed in the consolidated financial statements or in the combined management report: the audit of the group sustainability report and the audit of the remuneration report of RWE Aktiengesellschaft, Essen / Germany.
Our auditor's report must always be read together with the audited consolidated financial statements and the audited combined management report as well as with the audited ESEF documents. The consolidated financial statements and the combined management report converted into the ESEF format - including the versions to be submitted for inclusion in the Company Register - are merely electronic reproductions of the audited consolidated financial statements and the audited combined management report and do not take their place. In particular, the ESEF report and our audit opinion contained therein are to be used solely together with the audited ESEF documents made available in electronic form.
The German Public Auditor responsible for the engagement is Dr Benedikt Brüggemann.
Düsseldorf / Germany, 28 February 2025
Wirtschaftsprüfungsgesellschaft
Signed:| | |
| :-- | :-- |
| Martin C. Bornhofen | Dr Benedikt Brüggemann |
| Wirtschaftsprüfer | Wirtschaftsprüfer |
| (German Public Auditor) | (German Public Auditor) |
RWE AG's group financial statements for fiscal 2024 - consisting of the Group balance sheet, Group income statement, Group statement of comprehensive income, Group statement of changes in equity, Group cash flow statement and the Notes to the Group financial statements - were audited by Deloitte GmbH Wirtschaftsprüfungsgesellschaft.
Dr Benedikt Brüggemann was the responsible auditor for RWE's group financial statements. Dr Brüggemann took on this role for the first time.
ASSURANCE REPORT OF THE INDEPENDENT GERMAN PUBLIC AUDITOR ON AN ASSURANCE ENGAGEMENT TO OBTAIN LIMITED AND REASONABLE ASSURANCE IN RELATION TO THE COMBINED SUSTAINABILITY STATEMENT
We have conducted a limited assurance engagement on the sustainability statement of RWE Aktiengesellschaft, Essen / Germany, combining the consolidated sustainability statement and the non-financial statement of the parent, included in section "Group Sustainability statement" of the combined management report for the parent and the group, ("the Combined Sustainability Statement") for the financial year from 1 January to 31 December 2024. In addition, we have performed a reasonable assurance engagement on the disclosures on the "proportion of capital expenditure to assets or processes associated with economic activities that qualify as environmentally sustainable under Article 3 and Article 9 of Regulation (EU) 2020/852" (Article 8 (2) b) of Regulation (EU) 2020/852 (EU Taxonomy) included in the Combined Sustainability Statement. The Combined Sustainability Statement was prepared to fulfil the requirements of Directive (EU) 2022/2464 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 14 December 2022 (Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive, CSRD) and Article 8 of Regulation (EU) 2020/852 and Sections 289b to 289e, 315b and 315c German Commercial Code (HGB) for a combined non-financial statement.
Based on the procedures performed and the evidence obtained, nothing has come to our attention that causes us to believe that the Combined Sustainability Statement is not prepared, in all material respects, in accordance with the requirements of the CSRD and
Article 8 of Regulation (EU) 2020/852, Sections 289b to 289e, 315b and 315c HGB for a combined non-financial statement, and the specifying criteria presented by the executive directors of the Company. This assurance conclusion includes that nothing has come to our attention that causes us to believe
In addition, based on the procedures performed and the evidence obtained, the disclosures subject to a reasonable assurance engagement comply, in all respects material to the Combined Sustainability Statement, with the related requirements of
Article 8 of Regulation (EU) 2020/852 and Sections 315b and 315c HGB for a consolidated non-financial statement, and the specifying criteria presented by the executive directors of the Company.
We do not express an assurance conclusion or assurance opinion on individual disclosures.
We conducted our assurance engagement in accordance with the International Standard on Assurance Engagements (ISAE) 3000 (Revised): "Assurance Engagements Other Than Audits or Reviews of Historical Financial Information", issued by the International Auditing and Assurance Standards Board (IAASB).
The procedures performed in a limited assurance engagement vary in nature and timing from, and are less in extent than for, a reasonable assurance engagement. Consequently, the level of assurance obtained is substantially lower than the assurance that would have been obtained had a reasonable assurance engagement been performed.
Our responsibilities under ISAE 3000 (Revised) are further described in section "German Public Auditor's Responsibilities for the Assurance Engagement on the Combined Sustainability Statement".
We are independent of the entity in accordance with the requirements of European law and German commercial and professional law, and we have fulfilled our other German professional responsibilities in accordance with these requirements. Our audit firm has applied the requirements of the IDW Quality Management Standards. We believe that the evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our assurance conclusion and opinion.
The executive directors are responsible for the preparation of the Combined Sustainability Statement in accordance with the requirements of the CSRD and the applicable German legal and other European requirements as well as with the specifying criteria presented by the executive directors of the Company and for designing, implementing and maintaining such internal control as they have considered necessary to enable the preparation of a combined sustainability statement in accordance with these requirements that is free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud (i. e. fraudulent reporting in the Combined Sustainability Statement) or error.
This responsibility of the executive directors includes establishing and maintaining the materiality assessment process, selecting and applying appropriate reporting policies for preparing the Combined Sustainability Statement as well as making assumptions and estimates and ascertaining forward-looking information for individual sustainabilityrelated disclosures.
The supervisory board is responsible for overseeing the process for the preparation of the Combined Sustainability Statement.
The CSRD and the applicable German legal and other European requirements contain wording and terms that are subject to considerable interpretation uncertainties and for which no authoritative comprehensive interpretations have yet been published. The executive directors have made interpretations of such wording and terms in the Combined Sustainability Statement. The executive directors are responsible for the reasonableness of these interpretations. As such wording and terms may be interpreted differently by
regulators or courts, the legality of measurements or evaluations of the sustainability matters based on these interpretations is uncertain. The quantification of non-financial performance indicators disclosed in the Combined Sustainability Statement is also subject to inherent uncertainties.
These inherent limitations also affect the assurance engagement on the Combined Sustainability Statement.
Our objective is to express a limited assurance conclusion based on the assurance engagement we have conducted, on whether any matters have come to our attention that cause us to believe that the Combined Sustainability Statement has not been prepared, in all material respects, in accordance with the CSRD, the applicable German legal and other European requirements and the specifying criteria presented by the executive directors of the Company.
In addition, our objective is to express a reasonable assurance opinion based on the assurance engagement we have conducted, on whether the concerned disclosures of the Combined Sustainability Statement are prepared, in all material respects, in accordance with Article 8 (2) b) of Regulation (EU) 2020 / 852 and the applicable German legal and other European requirements and the specifying criteria presented by the executive directors of the Company.
Furthermore, our objective is to issue an assurance report that includes our assurance conclusion and opinion on the Combined Sustainability Statement.
As part of a limited and reasonable assurance engagement in accordance with ISAE 3000 (Revised), we exercise professional judgement and maintain professional scepticism. We also
- obtain an understanding of the process used to prepare the Combined Sustainability Statement, including the materiality assessment process carried out by the entity to identify the disclosures to be reported in the Combined Sustainability Statement. In respect of the disclosures subject to a reasonable assurance engagement, we also obtain an understanding of the controls that are relevant for preparing these disclosures.
- identify disclosures where a material misstatement due to fraud or error is likely to arise, design and perform procedures to address these disclosures and obtain limited assurance to support the assurance conclusion. In respect of the disclosures subject to a reasonable assurance engagement, we identify and assess the risks of material misstatement due to fraud or error, and design and perform procedures to address these risks and obtain reasonable assurance for our assurance opinion. The risk of not detecting a material misstatement resulting from fraud is higher than the risk of not detecting a material misstatement resulting from error, as fraud may involve collusion, forgery, intentional omissions, misrepresentations or the override of internal control. In addition, the risk of not detecting a material misstatement in information obtained from sources not within the entity's control (value chain information) is ordinarily higher than the risk of not detecting a material misstatement in information obtained from sources within the entity's control, as both the entity's executive directors and we as practitioners are ordinarily subject to restrictions on direct access to the sources of the value chain information.
A limited and reasonable assurance engagement involves the performance of procedures to obtain evidence about the sustainability information. The nature, timing and extent of the selected procedures are subject to our professional judgement.
In performing our limited assurance engagement, we
In performing our reasonable assurance engagement in relation to the disclosures on the "proportion of capital expenditure to assets or processes associated with economic activities that qualify as environmentally sustainable under Article 3 and Article 9 of Regulation (EU) 2020/852", we also
We issue this report as stipulated in the engagement letter agreed with the Company (including the "General Engagement Terms for Wirtschaftsprüferinnen, Wirtschaftsprüfer and Wirtschaftsprüfungsgesellschaften (German Public Auditors and Public Audit Firms)" dated 1 January 2024 of the Institut der Wirtschaftsprüfer (IDW)). We draw attention to the fact that the assurance engagement was conducted for the Company's purposes and that the report is intended solely to inform the Company about the result of the assurance engagement. Consequently, it may not be suitable for any other than the aforementioned purpose. Accordingly, the report is not intended to be used by third parties as a basis for making (financial) decisions based on it.
Our responsibility is to the Company alone. We do not accept any responsibility to third parties. Our assurance conclusion and opinion are not modified in this respect.
Düsseldorf / Germany, 28 February 2025
Wirtschaftsprüfungsgesellschaft
Signed:
Martin C. Bornhofen
Wirtschaftsprüfer
(German Public Auditor)
Signed:
Dr Benedikt Brüggemann
Wirtschaftsprüfer
(German Public Auditor)
Responsibility statement
To the best of our knowledge, and in accordance with the applicable reporting principles, the consolidated financial statements give a true and fair view of the assets, liabilities, financial position and profit or loss of the Group, and the combined management report includes a fair review of the development and performance of the business and the position of the Group, together with a description of the principal opportunities and risks associated with the expected development of the Group.
Essen, 27 February 2025
The Executive Board

Krebber

Müller

van Doren
6.1 Five-year overview ..... 373
6.2 Imprint ..... 374
6.3 Financial calendar 2025/2026 ..... 375
| Five-year overview of the RWE Group ${ }^{1}$ | 3024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| External revenue (excluding natural gas tax/electricity tax) | € million | 24,224 | 28,521 | 38,415 | 24,571 | 13,688 | |
| Adjusted EBITDA | € million | 5,680 | 7,749 | 6,310 | 3,650 | 3,286 | |
| Adjusted EBIT | € million | 3,561 | 5,802 | 4,568 | 2,185 | 1,823 | |
| Income before tax | € million | 6,343 | 3,999 | 715 | 1,522 | 1,265 | |
| Net income / RWE AG shareholders' share in income | € million | 5,135 | 1,515 | 2,717 | 721 | 1,051 | |
| Adjusted net income | € million | 2,322 | 4,098 | 3,253 | 1,554 | 1,257 | |
| Earnings per share | € | 6.91 | 2.04 | 3.93 | 1.07 | 1.65 | |
| Adjusted net income per share | € | 3.12 | 6.10 | 4.71 | 2.30 | 1.97 | |
| Cash flows from operating activities | € million | 6,620 | 4,223 | 2,406 | 7,274 | 4,125 | |
| Free cash flow | € million | $-4,106$ | $-4,594$ | $-1,968$ | 4,562 | 1,132 | |
| Non-current assets | € million | 63,418 | 55,881 | 42,299 | 38,863 | 34,418 | |
| Current assets | € million | 35,022 | 50,631 | 96,274 | 103,446 | 27,224 | |
| Balance sheet equity | € million | 33,623 | 33,604 | 29,304 | 16,996 | 17,706 | |
| Non-current liabilities | € million | 37,242 | 39,815 | 29,584 | 28,306 | 27,435 | |
| Current liabilities | € million | 27,575 | 33,093 | 79,685 | 97,007 | 16,501 | |
| Balance sheet total | € million | 98,440 | 106,512 | 138,573 | 142,309 | 61,642 | |
| Equity ratio | \% | 34.2 | 31.5 | 21.1 | 11.9 | 28.7 | |
| Net debt (-1/net cash (+) | € million | $-11,177$ | $-6,587$ | 1,630 | 360 | $-4,432$ | |
| Workforce at the end of the year ${ }^{2}$ | 20,985 | 20,135 | 18,310 | 18,246 | 19,498 | ||
| $\mathrm{CO}_{2}$ emissions of our power stations | million metric tons | 52.6 | 60.6 | 83.0 | 80.9 | 67.0 |
1 The comparability of some of the figures for various fiscal years is limited due to changes in reporting.
2 Converted to full-time equivalent.
RWE Platz 1
45141 Essen
Germany
Phone +49 2015179-0
Fax +49 2015179-5299
E-mail [email protected]
Phone +49 2015179-3557
Internet www.rwe.com/en/ir
E-mail [email protected]
Phone +49 2015179-5008
E-mail [email protected]
For annual reports, interim reports, interim statements and further information on RWE, please visit us online at www.rwe.com/en.
RWE is a member of DIRK - the German Investor Relations Association.
wagneralliance Kommunikation GmbH, Offenbach am Main, Germany
Olu Taylor, Geretsried, Germany
André Laaks, Essen, Germany
RWE media library
This document was published on 20 March 2025. It is a translation of the German annual report. The consolidated financial statements and the management report are also published in the Commercial Register. These are the definitive versions.
Forward-looking statements. This Annual Report contains statements regarding the future development of the RWE Group and its companies as well as economic and political developments. These statements are assessments that we have made based on information available to us at the time this document was prepared. Despite this, actual developments can deviate from our expectations, for instance, if underlying assumptions do not materialise or unforeseen risks arise. Therefore, we cannot assume responsibility for the correctness of forward-looking statements.
| 30 April 2025 | Annual General Meeting |
|---|---|
| 02 May 2025 | Ex-dividend date |
| 06 May 2025 | Dividend payment |
| 15 May 2025 | Interim statement on the first quarter of 2025 |
| 14 August 2025 | Interim report on the first half of 2025 |
| 12 November 2025 | Interim statement on the first three quarters of 2025 |
| 12 March 2026 | Annual report for fiscal 2025 |
| 30 April 2026 | Annual General Meeting |
| 04 May 2026 | Ex-dividend date |
| 06 May 2026 | Dividend payment |
| 13 May 2026 | Interim statement on the first quarter of 2026 |
| 13 August 2026 | Interim report on the first half of 2026 |
| 11 November 2026 | Interim statement on the first three quarters of 2026 |
The Annual General Meeting and all events concerning the publication of our financial reports are broadcast live online and recorded. We will keep recordings on our website for at least twelve months.
Building tools?
Free accounts include 100 API calls/year for testing.
Have a question? We'll get back to you promptly.