Annual / Quarterly Financial Statement • Dec 31, 2013
Annual / Quarterly Financial Statement
Open in ViewerOpens in native device viewer
Non-Consolidated Financial Statements December 31, 2013 and 2012 and January 1, 2012
| Independent Auditor |
1 |
|---|---|
| Financial Statements | |
| Non-Consolidated Statements of Financial Posi | |
| Non | |
| Non-Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss | 4 |
| Non-Consolidated Statements of Changes in | 5 |
| Non-C | . 6 |
| Notes to Non- | -32 |
To the Management of Unilever United States, Inc.
We have audited the accompanying non-consolidated financial statements of Unilever United States, Inc., which comprise the non-consolidated statements of financial position as of December 31, 2013, December 31, 2012 and January 1, 2012, and the related non-consolidated statements of income (loss), of comprehensive income (loss), of changes in equity and of cash flows for the years ended December 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012.
Management is responsible for the preparation and fair presentation of the non-consolidated financial statements in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board; this includes the design, implementation, and maintenance of internal control relevant to the preparation and fair presentation of non-consolidated financial statements that are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error.
Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the non-consolidated financial statements based on our audit. We conducted our audit in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the non-consolidated financial statements are free from material misstatement.
An audit involves performing procedures to obtain audit evidence about the amounts and disclosures in the non-consolidated financial statements. The procedures selected depend on our judgment, including the assessment of the risks of material misstatement of the non-consolidated financial statements, whether due to fraud or error. In making those risk assessments, we consider internal control relevant to the Company's preparation and fair presentation of the non-consolidated financial statements in order to design audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company's internal control. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes evaluating the appropriateness of accounting policies used and the reasonableness of significant accounting estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the non-consolidated financial statements. We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our audit opinion.
In our opinion, the non-consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Unilever United States, Inc. at December 31, 2013, December 31, 2012 and January 1, 2012, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the years ended December 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012, in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board.
April 4, 2014
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, 400 Campus Drive, Florham Park, NJ 07932 T: (973) 236-4000, F: (973) 236-5000
| \$ thousands | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| December 31, | January 1, | |||
| 2013 | 2012 | 2012 | ||
| Assets | ||||
| Non-current assets: | ||||
| Prepaid expenses (12) | 1,701 | 3,581 | 7,252 | |
| Investments in subsidiaries (3) | 29,374,753 | 29,229,392 | 29,106,647 | |
| Funds in escrow (9,15) | - | 6,544 | 6,544 | |
| Deferred taxes (7) | 46,601 | 55,415 | 53,022 | |
| Total non-current assets | 29,423,055 | 29,294,932 | 29,173,465 | |
| Current assets: | ||||
| Cash and cash equivalents (9) | 130 | 221 | 344 | |
| Investment in equity shares of Ultimate Parent (9,10) | 1,675 | 272 | 937 | |
| Prepaid expenses (12) | 15,563 | 15,087 | 3,223 | |
| Net amounts due from Unilever Group affiliates (8) | 9,594 | 9,542 | 16,433 | |
| Other current assets | 29 | 881 | 219 | |
| Total current assets | 26,991 | 26,003 | 21,156 | |
| Total assets | 29,450,046 | 29,320,935 | 29,194,621 | |
| Liabilities and Equity | ||||
| Equity: (13) | ||||
| Called up share capital | 1 | 1 | 1 | |
| Share premium | 1,341,561 | 1,341,561 | 1,341,561 | |
| Retained earnings | 20,243,048 | 21,845,410 | 23,141,646 | |
| Total equity | 21,584,610 | 23,186,972 | 24,483,208 | |
| Non-current Liabilities: | ||||
| Liabilities to employee benefit plans (5) | 70,522 | 86,348 | 87,828 | |
| Liabilities for share-based compensation (6) | 38,583 | 44,825 | 29,340 | |
| Other | 6 | 1,367 | 1,366 | |
| Total non-current liabilities | 109,111 | 132,540 | 118,534 | |
| Current liabilities: | ||||
| Trade and other payables (14) | 45,308 | 46,823 | 17,591 | |
| Provisions (15) | 2,575 | 847 | 1,013 | |
| Liabilities to employee benefit plans (5) | 8,171 | 7,933 | 11,202 | |
| Other payables | 506 | 908 | 510 | |
| Liabilities for share-based compensation (6) | 17,586 | 20,758 | 28,649 | |
| Net amounts due to Unilever Group affiliates (8) | 5,629 | 3,401 | 3,743 | |
| Net amounts due to UNUS Group affiliates (8) | 7,676,550 | 5,920,753 | 4,530,171 | |
| Total current liabilities | 7,756,325 | 6,001,423 | 4,592,879 | |
| Total liabilities and equity | 29,450,046 | 29,320,935 | 29,194,621 |
| \$ thousands | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2013 | 2012 | |
| Management operations: | ||
| Income (expense), net of rebilling (8) | (9,164) | (10,288) |
| Finance income (expense): | ||
| Interest on intercompany debt (8) | (252,156) | (141,619) |
| Dividend income from affiliate (8) | - | 884,418 |
| Other investment income | 9 | 33 |
| Interest on benefit plans (5) | (3,628) | (3,339) |
| Other interest expense | (546) | - |
| (256,321) | 739,493 | |
| (Loss) income before taxes | (265,485) | 729,205 |
| Income tax expense (benefit) (7) | (99,995) | (57,659) |
| Net (loss) income | (165,490) | 786,864 |
| \$ thousands | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2013 | 2012 | |
| Net (loss) income | (165,490) | 786,864 |
| Items that will not be reclassified to income: Actuarial gains on benefit programs, net of tax of |
||
| \$5.1 million in 2013 and \$.79 million in 2012 | 8,828 | 1,318 |
| Comprehensive (loss) income | (156,662) | 788,182 |
| \$ thousands | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Share | Share | Retained | ||
| Total | Capital | Premium | Earnings | |
| Equity, January 1, 2012 | 24,483,208 | 1 | 1,341,561 | 23,141,646 |
| Comprehensive income | 788,182 | - | - | 788,182 |
| Dividends declared | (2,084,418) | - | - | (2,084,418) |
| Equity, December 31, 2012 | 23,186,972 | 1 | 1,341,561 | 21,845,410 |
| Comprehensive loss | (156,662) | - | - | (156,662) |
| Dividends declared | (1,445,700) | - | - | (1,445,700) |
| Equity, December 31, 2013 | 21,584,610 | 1 | 1,341,561 | 20,243,048 |
| \$ thousands | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2013 | 2012 | |
| Cash flows from operating activities: | ||
| Net (loss) income | (165,490) | 786,864 |
| Dividend income | - | (884,418) |
| Income tax (benefit) | (99,995) | (57,659) |
| Post employment benefits | 6,337 | 8,560 |
| Share-based payments | 10,700 | 24,300 |
| Interest expense | 256,330 | 144,958 |
| Interest paid | (546) | - |
| Changes in assets and liabilities: | ||
| Prepaid expenses | 1,404 | (8,193) |
| Net amounts due from Unilever Group affiliates | 2,176 | 6,549 |
| Other current assets | 852 | (661) |
| Accounts payable | (969) | 29,232 |
| Provisions | 1,728 | (166) |
| Liabilities for share-based compensation | (20,114) | (16,706) |
| Other payables | (1,761) | 399 |
| Liabilities to employee benefit plans | (7,932) | (11,203) |
| Cash (used) provided by operating activities | (17,280) | 21,856 |
| Cash flows from investing activities: | ||
| Investment in equity securities of Ultimate Parent | (42,946) | (67,603) |
| Funds in escrow | 6,544 | - |
| Dividend income | - | 884,418 |
| Cash (used) provided by investing activities | (36,402) | 816,815 |
| Cash flows from financing activities: | ||
| Dividend to Unilever Group | (1,445,700) | (2,084,418) |
| Net borrowings from UNUS Group affiliates | 1,499,291 | 1,245,624 |
| Cash provided (used) by financing activities | 53,591 | (838,794) |
| Net change in cash and cash equivalents | (91) | (123) |
| Cash and cash equivalents: | ||
| Beginning of year | 221 | 344 |
| End of year | 130 | 221 |
(non-consolidated) financial statements of the Company pursuant to the exemption afforded under paragraph 4a of International Financial Reporting Standard 10 Consolidated financial statements.
The Company is a wholly owned subsidiary of UNUS Holding BV (incorporated in the Netherlands) which itself is an indirect, wholly-owned, joint subsidiary of Unilever N.V. (incorporated in the Netherlands) and Unilever PLC (incorporated in the United Kingdom) ) whose consolidated financial statements are prepared in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards and are available at Unilever N.V. Investor Relations Department, Weena 455, PO Box 760, 3000 DK Rotterdam, The Netherlands. The Company is incorporated and domiciled in the United States.
argest suppliers of fast moving consumer goods. It manufactures, markets and sells products in the food, personal care and household products industries throughout the world. The Unilever Group conducts its business in the United States primarily through Conopco, Inc. ( Conopco ), an entity wholly-owned by UNUS. Unilever Capital Corporation ( UCC ), another wholly owned subsidiary of the Company, provides financing for Unilever ted States operations.
As a holding company, UNUS provides management services to its operating subsidiaries and facilitates communications and the flow of information between those subsidiaries and other entities within the Unilever Group.
These separate financial statements have been prepared in accordance with IFRS 1 First-time Adoption of International Financial Reporting Standards (Note 2.)
The accompanying financial statements have been prepared in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board.
The functional and reporting currency is the United States dollar.
The separate financial statements have been prepared on the historical cost basis unless otherwise indicated.
income is dividends from Conopco. These are recognized in the statement of income (loss) when established, which is generally when the dividend has been declared. However, to the extent a reduced. There were no distributions in 2013 or 2012 that represent a return of capital.
s of an investment in shares of the Ultimate Parent. The Company acquires Unilever N.V. shares and Unilever PLC American Depository Receipts ADRs to satisfy obligations under share-based compensation programs in the near term. These equity securities are classified at fair value through profit and loss.
Cash and cash equivalents are financial assets and include deposits, investments in money market funds and highly liquid investments that have are the following characteristics:
The preparation of financial statements requires management to make judgments, estimates and assumptions in the application of accounting policies that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, income, and expenses and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. Actual results may differ from these estimates. Estimates and judgments are evaluated continuously and are based on historical experience and other factors, including expectations of future events that are believed to be reasonable. Revisions to accounting estimates are recognized in the period in which the estimate is revised and in applicable subsequent periods.
Significant estimates and judgments involved in the preparation of these financial statements include the following:
The Company purchases shares of its Ultimate Parent (Unilever N.V. shares and Unilever PLC ADRs) to settle share based compensation awards and therefore considers its award programs to be cash-settled plans in these separate financial statements. Accordingly, compensation expense determined under share-based compensation plans is adjusted at the end of each reporting period through profit and loss to reflect the fair value of the related liability.
The Company sponsors one funded defined benefit pension plan and several unfunded defined pension and welfare benefit plans for its employees and the employees of its subsidiaries. The most significant plans are open to substantially all employees and are subject to the provisions of the Employment and Retirement Services Act of 1974 ( ERISA ). ERISA sets general and specific standards regarding requirements including, but not limited to plan participation, minimum funding, and participant vesting. In addition, the significant plans are subject to provisions of the Internal Revenue Code governing deductibility of plan contributions and the exemption of plan trusts from income tax.
The operating and financing components related to defined benefit plans are recognized separately in the statement of income (loss). Operating costs (service costs) represent the cost of accruing benefits to employees during the year plus the cost of other events such as plan amendments involving enhanced benefits for prior service or termination and curtailments. The amount charged or credited to finance costs is a net interest expense calculated by applying the liability discount rate to the net defined benefit liability or asset. Differences between the interest on assets and return actually achieved and any changes in the liabilities over the year due to changes in assumptions or experience within the plans are recognized immediately in the statement of comprehensive income (loss).
The liabilities to employee benefit plans in the statement of financial position are comprised of the present value of the defined benefit plan obligation (determined using the projected unit credit method) allocable to UNUS. That liability is discounted using rates based on high quality corporate bonds less the fair value of plan assets allocable to UNUS. defined benefit plans are subject to annual independent actuarial valuations prepared as of the reporting date.
With respect to defined contribution plans, the Company records an expense in the statement of income (loss) defined contribution plans is limited to the amounts required to be contributed each year. The assets and liabilities of defined contribution plans are not reflected in these financial statements.
The Company files its tax returns on a consolidated basis with the UNUS Group for federal purposes. Income taxes reflected in these financial statements are determined using the separate return method. Under this method, the Company is assumed to file a separate return mount of tax payable or refundable based on its hypothetical, current-year separate return. The rules followed by the Company in computing its tax or refund are the same as those it would follow when filing a separate return with the taxing authorities.
Income taxes are comprised of current and deferred tax. Current taxes are based on the enacted and substantially enacted tax rates and are recognized in the statement of income (loss) except to the extent that they relate to items recognized directly in equity. Current tax benefit may also include adjustments to amounts recorded for tax assets and liabilities in prior years.
The Company recognizes deferred taxes on its temporary differences and on any carryforwards that it could claim on its hypothetical return except to the extent benefits are not expected to be utilized by the consolidated UNUS Group. The Company also assesses the need for a valuation allowance on the basis of its projected separate return results. Deferred taxes are based on the expected manner of realization or settlement using tax rates enacted as of the fiscal year end. Deferred income tax assets and liabilities are offset when there is a legally enforceable right to offset current tax assets against current tax liabilities and when the deferred income tax is related to the same regulatory authority. Deferred taxes are not provided on temporary differences related to investments in subsidiaries to the extent that they will probably not reverse in the foreseeable future.
Provisions are recognized when the Company has a present obligation (legal or constructive) arising from a past event, it is probable that an outflow of resources embodying economic benefits will be required to settle the obligation, and a reliable estimate of the amount of the obligation is available. Provisions are discounted if the effect is material to the financial statements. No provisions were discounted in these financial statements.
IAS 19 Employee Benefits (revised) is effective January 1, 2013. This accounting pronouncement changes certain disclosure requirements for post-employment benefit plans and restricts the number of accounting options available to defined benefit pension plans. The return on pension plan assets and finance charge have been replaced by a net interest expense or income calculated by applying the liability discount rate to the net defined benefit liability. Administration costs by pension funds will now be recognized as an expense when the administrative services are performed. These changes haves been incorporated into the December 31, 2012 pension liability amounts and the pension expense for the year then ended.
IAS 1 Presentation of Financial Statements - was amended effective January 1, 2013 to require that items of other comprehensive income that will likely reverse in future periods be presented separately from those items that will not reverse in future periods. This change has been incorporated into the financial statements.
IFRS 12 - Disclosures of Interests in Other Entities, effective January 1, 2013, requires enhanced disclosures of the nature, risks and financial effects associated with interests in subsidiaries. IFRS cial statements.
IFRS 13 - Fair value measurement explains how to measure fair value and enhances fair value disclosures. The standard does not significantly change the measurement of fair value but codifies it in one place.
IFRS 10 - Consolidated financial statements replaces previous guidance on control and consolidation.
Amendments to IFRS 7 - Financial instruments: Disclosures introduces new disclosures of information about the significance of financial instruments to an entity.
Amendments to IAS 16 - Property, plant and equipment explains that servicing equipment is not classified as inventory when used for more than one year. IAS 16 is not applicable to the preparation of these financial statements.
IFRS 11 - Joint arrangements requires joint arrangements to be accounted for as a joint operation or as a joint venture. IFRS 11 is not applicable to these financial statements.
A number of new standards and amendments to standards and interpretations are effective for annual periods beginning after January 1, 2014 and have not been applied in preparing these separate financial statements. None of these are expected to have a significant effect on the separate financial statements of the Company.
These financial statements reflect the adoption and application of IFRS 1 First-time Adoption of International Financial Reporting Standards. Previously, the Company has not prepared separate financial statements for any period under any financial reporting framework. The 2013. All IFRS in effect on the reporting date have been utilized in the preparation of the financial statements for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012 and in the opening balance sheet as of January 1, 2012. The Company has utilized the following exemptions, available to it under IFRS 1, to apply certain requirements only with effect from the date of transition:
The Company has elected to use fair value as of the date of transition as deemed cost to account for its investment in Conopco.
-owned subsidiaries as of December 31, 2013 and 2012:
| Country | Principal | \$ thousands | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Of | Place of | December 31, | ||||
| Subsidiary | Incorporation | Business | 2013 | 2012 | 2012 | |
| Conopco, Inc. | U.S. | U.S. | 29,371,306 | 29,225,945 | 29,103,200 | |
| UCC | U.S. | U.S. | 3,447 | 3,447 | 3,447 | |
| 29,374,753 | 29,229,392 | 29,106,647 |
The carrying value of UCC is historical cost. UCC provides financing for all entities within the UNUS Group. It has no other independent operations.
on its fair value as of January 1, 2012 (date of transition to IFRS). Fair value was determined by management using an independent valuation specialist using both the discounted cash flow and comparable market company approaches with equal weighting given to each technique. The weighted average fair value of the Company so determined (\$22.6 billion) was reduced by the standing debt (\$12.9 billion) and increased by the fair value of its ") of Mixhold B.V., a subsidiary of the Ultimate Parent. During the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012 the Company acquired equity shares of its Ultimate Parent, which were then provided to employees of Conopco, of \$41.7 million and \$68.3 million, respectively. The contribution of such amounts is not recovered from Conopco, and as such is treated as increases to the Company's investment in Conopco. In addition, during the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012 the Company generated income tax receivables of \$103.6 million and \$54.5 million, respectively, which are used to offset income taxes payable by Conopco in the Company's consolidated income tax returns. Those income tax receivables are not recovered from Conopco, and as such are treated as increases to the Company's investment in Conopco.
l of the UNUS Group revenues are generated through it. Significant inputs used in the discounted cash flow and market approach to determine the deemed cost as of January 1, 2012 were as follows:
| Input | Factor |
|---|---|
| Discounted cash flows: | |
| Discount rate | 8.50% |
| Weighted average cost of capital | 8.50% |
| Long-term growth rate | 3.00% |
| Market approach: | |
| EBITDA multiple | 11.0-11.50 |
| Control premium | 20% |
The significant unobservable inputs in the fair value measurement of Conopco using the discounted cash flow method were the discount rate, the long-term growth rate and the estimated future cash flows. An increase (decrease) in the discount rate would result in a decrease (increase) in the estimate of value. An increase (decrease) in the growth rate and the estimated future cash flows would result in a directionally similar change in the estimate of value.
The significant unobservable inputs in the fair value measurement of Conopco using the market approach are the EBITDA multiple and the control premium. An increase (decrease) in both of these inputs would have a directionally similar change in the estimate of value.
was determined by applying specific discount rates to the future cash flows of each class of the preferred shares. Discount rates ranged from 3.77% to 4.23% and were determined based on the estimated yield of the preferred stock commensurate with the years to maturity.
During the year ended December 31, 2012 the Company received dividends totaling \$884 million from Conopco. No dividends were received in 2013.
Staff and management costs for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012 consist of the following:
| \$ thousands | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2013 | 2012 | |
| 28,900 | 32,637 | |
| 2,967 | 3,183 | |
| 3,267 | 2,489 | |
| 8,407 | 21,750 | |
| 43,541 | 60,059 | |
| 9,633 | 10,106 | |
| 199 | 231 | |
| 2,308 | 2,556 | |
| 12,140 | 12,893 | |
Key management includes members of the Executive leadership team and other (executive and non-executive) company officers. The above compensation is presented in the statement of income (loss) within income (expense), net of rebilling. All compensation, with the exception of share-based payments, is rebilled to affiliates.
The Company sponsors pension and welfare benefit plans for both its employees and the employees of its subsidiaries under six pension plans and two welfare benefit plans. The only funded postretirement benefit plan. It is the is to contribute the minimum required contribution and comply with applicable U.S. law. The Company may increase its contribution above the minimum if appropriate to its tax and cash position and the funded position of the plan. The Company has a stated policy of allocating net defined benefit cost among UNUS Group entities based on the ratio that the pensionable salaries of an individual employer bears to the pensionable salaries of all employers under the plan.
Benefits under pension plans are generally determined based on years of service and pensionable remuneration. Benefits under welfare benefit plans, including post-retirement healthcare plans, are defined in the plan documents.
results of operations to Unilever Group. For purposes of preparing these separate financial statements, subsidiaries based on the ratio of the benefit obligations related to employees (current and retired), to the total of all benefit obligations under the plan.
For the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012 the defined benefit cost related to these plans was based on the ratio of pensionable salaries in UNUS to the total of all pensionable salaries in the plans.
The Company follows Unilever Group policy guidelines with respect to the investment of pension assets. Those guidelines require the allocation of plan assets to various classes of investments with the goal of controlling risk and maintaining the right balance between risk and long-term returns in order to limit the cost of the plans to the Company. The diversification of plan assets is such that the failure of a single investment would not impact the overall level of plan assets. The plan continues to invest a significant proportion of assets in equities which offer the best returns over the long run commensurate with an acceptable level of risk. The plans expose the Company to investment risk, interest rate risk, and longevity risk. In order to mitigate such risks the plan also has significant investments in bonds and other alternative investments.
The following represent the significant assumptions in the determination of the benefit obligation -retirement plans as of December 31, 2013 and 2012:
| 2013 | 2012 | |
|---|---|---|
| Discount rate | 3.80% | 3.90% |
| Inflation | 2.30% | 2.30% |
| Rate of salary increase | 3.50% | 3.50% |
| Long-term medical care rate | 5.00% | 5.00% |
| Number of years a current pensioner is expected | ||
| to live past 65 | ||
| Men | 20.40 | 19.03 |
| Women | 22.68 | 20.93 |
| Number of years a future pensioner currently | ||
| aged 45 is expected to live past 65 | ||
| Men | 20.89 | 20.60 |
| Women | 23.22 | 22.48 |
Mortality assumptions are based on the table RP-2000.
Valuations of other post-employment benefit plans assume a higher initial level of medical cost inflation, which drops from 7 percent to the long-term rate of 5 percent within 5 years. Healthcare cost trend assumptions can have a significant impact on the amounts reported for healthcare plans. A one percentage point change in the assumed healthcare cost trend rates would have the following impact:
| \$ millions | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1% increase | 1% decrease | ||
| Effect on total of interest and | |||
| service cost components | 1 | (1) | |
| Effect on total benefit | |||
| obligation | 2 | (3) |
Changes in key assumptions used in the determination of pension liabilities can also significantly impact reported amounts for pension plans. Following is a summary of the effect on reported amounts of a change on key assumptions of a one-half percentage:
| Change in assumptions | Impact on liabilities | |
|---|---|---|
| Discount rate | Increase/decrease by .05% | Decrease/increase by 5% |
| Inflation rate | Increase/decrease by .05% | Increase/decrease by 2% |
Statement of income (loss)
Net defined benefit cost of the plans charged to the statement of income (loss) for the Company and for the plans as a whole for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012 are as follows:
| \$ thousands | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Company The Plans |
||||
| 2013 | 2012 | 2013 | 2012 | |
| Charged to operating profit: | ||||
| Current service cost | 4,109 | 5,221 | 51,854 | 59,707 |
| Special termination benefits | - | - | 3,237 | - |
| Past service cost | (1,400) | - | (31,139) | 2,599 |
| Settlements/curtailments | - | - | (16,890) | (2,478) |
| Total operating costs | 2,709 | 5,221 | 7,062 | 59,828 |
| Finance costs | 3,628 | 3,339 | 38,332 | 23,666 |
Net defined benefit cost of the plans charged to comprehensive income (loss) for the Company and for the plans as a whole for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012 are as follows:
| \$ thousands | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Company | The Plans | |||||
| 2013 | 2012 | 2013 | 2012 | |||
| Return on plan assets excluding amounts included in net finance |
||||||
| cost | 2,472 | 6,616 | 44,509 | 132,036 | ||
| Experience gains | 867 | 911 | 49,601 | 24,969 | ||
| Changes in assumptions | 10,654 | (5,421) | 233,054 | (148,644) | ||
| Net actuarial gain recognized in comprehensive income |
13,993 | 2,106 | 327,164 | 8,361 |
The assets, liabilities and deficit position of pension and other post-employment benefit plans at follows:
| \$ thousands | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2013 | 2012 | |||||
| Other Post- | Other Post | |||||
| employment | employment | |||||
| Pension | Benefit | Pension | Benefit | |||
| Plans | Plans | Plans | Plans | |||
| Principal plan assets: | ||||||
| Equities | 31,155 | - | 36,063 | - | ||
| Bonds | 39,221 | - | 27,766 | - | ||
| Other | 4,472 | - | 15,876 | - | ||
| 74,848 | - | 79,705 | - | |||
| Present value of liabilities: | ||||||
| Principal plans | 75,695 | 13,372 | 90,958 | 13,748 | ||
| Other plans | 64,474 | - | 69,280 | - | ||
| 140,169 | 13,372 | 160,238 | 13,748 | |||
| Pension liability net of assets | 65,321 | 13,372 | 80,533 | 13,748 | ||
| Funded plans in deficit | 847 | - | 11,253 | - | ||
| Unfunded Plans | 64,474 | 13,372 | 69,280 | 13,748 | ||
| 65,321 | 13,372 | 80,533 | 13,748 |
The assets, liabilities and deficit position of pension and other post-employment benefit plans at December 31, 2013 and 2012 related to the Plan as a whole are as follows:
| \$ thousands | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2013 | 2012 | ||||
| Other Post- | Other Post | ||||
| employment | employment | ||||
| Pension | Benefit | Pension | Benefit | ||
| Plans | Plans | Plans | Plans | ||
| Principal plan assets: | |||||
| Equities | 619,563 | - | 715,108 | - | |
| Bonds | 779,966 | - | 550,586 | - | |
| Other | 88,937 | - | 314,806 | - | |
| 1,488,466 | - | 1,580,500 | - | ||
| Present value of liabilities: | |||||
| Principal plans | 1,505,317 | 471,171 | 1,843,985 | 558,776 | |
| Other plans | 180,700 | 7,883 | 196,807 | 10,068 | |
| 1,686,017 | 479,054 | 2,040,792 | 568,844 | ||
| Pension liability net of assets | 197,551 | 479,054 | 460,292 | 568,844 | |
| Funded plans in deficit | 16,851 | - | 263,485 | - | |
| Unfunded Plans | 180,700 | 479,054 | 196,807 | 568,844 | |
| 197,551 | 479,054 | 460,292 | 568,844 |
| \$ thousands | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Company | The Plans | |||||
| Other Post- | Other Post | |||||
| employment | employment | |||||
| Pension | Benefit | Pension | Benefit | |||
| Plans | Plans | Plans | Plans | |||
| Principal plan assets: | ||||||
| Equities | 35,947 | - | 710,583 | - | ||
| Bonds | 42,103 | - | 832,268 | - | ||
| Other | 1,055 | - | 20,843 | - | ||
| 79,105 | - | 1,563,694 | - | |||
| Present value of liabilities: | ||||||
| Principal plans | 91,339 | 14,911 | 1,805,524 | 562,633 | ||
| Other plans | 71,885 | - | 210,002 | 9,856 | ||
| 163,224 | 14,911 | 2,015,526 | 572,489 | |||
| Pension liability net of assets | 84,119 | 14,911 | 451,832 | 572,489 | ||
| Funded plans in deficit | 12,234 | - | 241,830 | - | ||
| Unfunded Plans | 71,885 | 14,911 | 210,002 | 572,489 | ||
| 84,119 | 14,911 | 451,832 | 572,489 |
The assets, liabilities and deficit position of pension and other post-employment benefit plans at January 1, 2012 related to the Company and the Plan as a whole are as follows:
s of the Ultimate Parent totaled \$190 thousand. As of December 31, 2013 the share of the investment in equity shares of the Ultimate Parent totaled \$10 thousand. The Plan had no investment in financial instruments of the Ultimate Parent as of December 31, 2012 or January 1, 2012.
plan are as follows:
| \$ thousands | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2013 | 2012 | ||||
| Assets | Liabilities | Assets | Liabilities | ||
| Balance, January 1 | 79,705 | 173,986 | 79,105 | 178,135 | |
| Current service cost | - | 4,109 | - | 5,221 | |
| Special termination benefits | - | - | - | - | |
| Past service costs | - | (1,400) | - | - | |
| Settlements/curtailments | - | - | - | - | |
| Interest income | 2,844 | - | 3,764 | - | |
| Interest costs | - | 6,472 | - | 7,102 | |
| Actuarial gain/(loss) | 2,472 | (11,521) | 6,616 | 4,510 | |
| Employer contributions | 7,932 | - | 11,202 | - | |
| Benefit payments | (18,105) | (18,105) | (20,982) | (20,982) | |
| Balance, December 31 | 74,848 | 153,541 | 79,705 | 173,986 |
Changes in the assets and liabilities of the Plan as a whole are as follows:
| \$ thousands | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2013 | 2012 | ||||
| Assets | Liabilities | Assets | Liabilities | ||
| Balance, January 1 | 1,580,500 | 2,609,636 | 1,563,694 | 2,588,015 | |
| Current service cost | - | 51,854 | - | 59,707 | |
| Special termination benefits | - | 3,237 | - | - | |
| Past service costs | - | (31,139) | - | 2,599 | |
| Settlements/curtailments | - | (16,890) | - | (2,478) | |
| Interest income | 56,197 | - | 73,809 | - | |
| Interest costs | - | 94,529 | - | 97,475 | |
| Plan mergers | - | - | - | 7,733 | |
| Actuarial gain/(loss) | 44,509 | (282,655) | 132,036 | 123,675 | |
| Employer contributions | 70,761 | - | 78,051 | - | |
| Benefit payments | (263,501) | (263,501) | (267,090) | (267,090) | |
| Balance, December 31 | 1,488,466 | 2,165,071 | 1,580,500 | 2,609,636 |
The C employment benefits includes contributions to its funded plan and benefits paid under unfunded plans. Amounts paid in 2013 and 2012 as well as an estimate for amounts to be paid in 2014 related to the participation in the plans are as follows:
| \$ thousands | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| (Estimate) | ||||
| 2014 | 2013 | 2012 | ||
| Company contributions to | ||||
| funded plans: | ||||
| Defined benefit | - | - | - | |
| Defined contribution | 2,310 | 2,337 | 1,948 | |
| Benefits paid under unfunded | ||||
| plans | 8,171 | 7,932 | 11,202 | |
| Cash flow | 10,481 | 10,269 | 13,150 |
Amounts paid in 2013 and 2012 as well as an estimate for amounts to be paid in 2014 related to the Plan as a whole are as follows:
| \$ thousands | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| (Estimate) | ||||
| 2014 | 2013 | 2012 | ||
| Company contributions to | ||||
| funded plans: | ||||
| Defined benefit | - | - | - | |
| Defined contribution | 50,100 | 50,100 | 49,522 | |
| Benefits paid under unfunded | ||||
| plans | 72,872 | 70,761 | 78,051 | |
| Cash flow | 122,972 | 120,861 | 127,573 |
closed to new participants in 2007. In 2012 the benefits of certain plan participants were frozen. The benefits of most of the remaining plan participants will be frozen in 2017.
to eligible employees of UNUS Group except employees located in Puerto Rico and employees covered by a collective bargaining agreement. The Plan is a qualified retirement plan under section 401(a) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 and is subject to the provisions of the Employee Retirement and Income Security Act of 1974.
Under the Plan the Company matches employee elective deferrals on a sliding scale based on plan. In addition, the Company makes a non-elective contribution equal to 4% of compensation for all eligible employees employed after January 1, 2007, whether or not they make elective -elective contributions for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012 were \$2.5 million and \$2.1 million, respectively and as of those dates amounts owed to the Plan, included in accounts payable and accrued expenses, totaled \$129 thousand and \$154 thousand, respectively. As of January 1, 2012 the amount owed to the Plan was \$166 thousand. basis.
The Company has several share-based programs and one share option program for UNUS Group employees which are covered by the Unilever North America 2002 Omnibus Equity Compensation Plan as amended in November 2012. The Omnibus Plan provides for the granting of options on up to 121.5 million Unilever N.V (New York Registry) shares, 117.9 million shares of Unilever PLC ADRs, 6 million ordinary shares of Unilever N.V and 1.3 million ordinary The Company purchases shares of Unilever N.V. and Unilever PLC ADRs to satisfy its share-based compensation program obligations and as of December 31, 2013 held 33.1 thousand Unilever N.V. shares (5.6 thousand shares at December 31, 2012 and 15.4 thousand shares at January 1, 2012) and 8.4 thousand Unilever PLC ADRs (1.5 thousand ADRs at December 31, 2012 and 12.4 thousand ADRs at January 1, 2012.) For the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012 sharebased compensation expense totaled \$10.7 million and \$24.3 million, respectively. As of December 31, 2013 and 2012 and January 1, 2012 liabilities related to share-based compensation plans totaled \$56.2 million, \$65.6 million and \$58 million, respectively.
The GPSP, together with its predecessor plan, the North American Performance Share Program, provides for the granting of Share awards to qualified employees within certain manager classes which vest over a three year performance period at levels ranging from 0 percent to 200 percent of a target award depending upon the achievement of specific performance conditions. The North American Performance Share Program terminated in 2013.
Generally awards are made annually covering the year of the grant and the subsequent two years. Shares are issued at the end of each three-year performance period based on actual performance versus the pre-established criteria. Individuals receive the shares issued only if they remain eligible at the end of the three year performance period. Performance metrics of the GPSP relate to sales growth, operating cash flow and core operating margin improvement. Certain employees may elect to defer the payment of vested shares until retirement. Awards are settled in Unilever NV shares and Unilever PLC ADRs in the year following the year in which the awards vest. However, the Company may elect to settle awards under the GPSP in cash.
The GSIP, which operates in a manner very similar to the GPSP, is limited to certain executives. Share awards vest over a three year period at levels ranging from 0% to 200% of a target award depending on the achievement of specific performance conditions. Performance metrics for the GSIP program include those of the GPSP program as well as one additional metric total shareholder return. Under the GSIP employees have more flexibility with respect to selecting the type of Shares to be received. Awards are settled in Unilever NV shares and Unilever PLC ADRs in the year following the year in which the awards vest. However, the Company reserves the right to settle the Shares in cash.
The MCIP, together with its predecessor allows certain employees who are eligible to participate in the GPSP and GSIP to invest up to 60 percent immediately vested. Under the MCIP the Company matches each Investment Share with up to subject to a three year vesting period and the achievement of specific performance conditions. The number of match Shares awarded can range from 0 percent to 200 percent of the target award.
MCIP participants who either are, or eligible to be, participants of the GPSP are subject to the GPSP performance conditions. MCIP participants who either are or are eligible to be participants of the GSIP are subject to the GSIP performance conditions. Match Shares are distributed at the end of the vesting period based on actual performance versus the preestablished criteria.
The ESBP operates in a manner similar to the MCIP with certain differences. Under the ESBP the Company matches purchased Shares on a one-tothe matching Shares is subject only to a three or five year vesting period without regards to performance criteria.
Compensation expense under the GPSP, GSIP and MCIP, which is charged over the performance period, is initially determined on the date of the award based on the fair value of the target shares awarded and the number of Shares expected to vest; the expense is updated annually for changes in the actual number of Shares expected to vest, changes in the fair value of the underlying Shares and the fair value of the liability to be settled.
Compensation expense under the ESBP is initially determined at the grant date based on the fair value of the matching Shares and adjusted annually over the vesting period based on changes in the current price of the Shares and the value of the liability at each reporting date.
Dividends related to the target award under the GPSP, GSIP and MCIP are credited to each employee and converted into additional target shares which are subject to the same vesting criteria as the original target shares. Dividends on ESBP matching Shares are credited to the employee and converted into additional matching Shares at settlement.
A summary of the status of performance share programs as of December 31, 2013 and 2012 and the changes therein during the years then ended are as follows:
| Number of Shares | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2013 | 2012 | |||
| Outstanding, January 1 | 1,480,088 | 1,104,255 | ||
| Awarded | 673,357 | 681,732 | ||
| Distributed | (843,782) | (305,782) | ||
| Forfeited | (4,817) | (117) | ||
| Outstanding, December 31, | 1,304,846 | 1,480,088 | ||
| Fair value per share award during the year |
\$ | 40.28 | \$ | 35.89 |
Under the ESOP certain executives were granted options to acquire Shares at an option price that equals the market value on the date the options are granted. The options became exercisable over a three year period from the date of the grant with a maximum term of 10 years. No options have been awarded under the ESOP since 2005 and all outstanding, unexercised options will expire in 2015.
Compensation expense related to option plans is initially measured on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option pricing model and current market assumptions. Option pricing models require the use of highly subjective assumptions, including expected stock price volatility, which when changed, can materially affect fair value estimates.
Options are revalued at each reporting period through profit and loss. Following is a summary of the weighted-average inputs to the Black-Scholes option pricing model used to estimate the fair value of options outstanding as of the reporting periods:
| 2013 | 2012 | 2011 | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unilever N.V. shares | |||||||
| Share price | \$ | 40.23 | \$ | 38.30 | \$ | 34.37 | |
| Exercise price | \$ | 21.97 | \$ | 21.10 | \$ | 20.51 | |
| Expected volatility | 16.00% | 19.00% | 26.84% | ||||
| Expected option term (years) | 0.3 | 0.93 | 1.45 | ||||
| Expected dividend yield | 3.47% | 3.20% | 3.61% | ||||
| Risk-free interest rate | 0.08% | 0.13% | 0.16% | ||||
| Unilever PLC ADRs | |||||||
| Share price | \$ | 41.20 | \$ | 38.72 | \$ | 33.52 | |
| Exercise price | \$ | 21.39 | \$ | 21.01 | \$ | 20.38 | |
| Expected volatility | 15.00% | 18.00% | 25.71% | ||||
| Expected option term (years) | 0.3 | 0.93 | 1.45 | ||||
| Expected dividend yield | 3.39% | 3.17% | 3.70% | ||||
| Risk-free interest rate | 0.08% | 0.13% | 0.16% |
Stock price volatility is based on the historical volatility of
For the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012 compensation expense under the ESOP (included in total share-based payment compensation above) amounted to \$627 thousand and \$2.6 million, respectively. As of December 31, 2013 and 2012 and January 1, 2012, liabilities related to the ESOP (included in total share-based payment liabilities above) amounted to \$3.6 million, \$8.9 million and \$20.1 million, respectively.
A summary of the changes in the status of options awarded and outstanding for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012 follows:
| 2013 | 2012 | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Weighted | Weighted | |||||
| Average | Average | |||||
| Number | Exercise | Number | Exercise | |||
| of Options | Price | of Options | Price | |||
| Unilever N.V. shares | ||||||
| Outstanding, January 1 | 274,712 | \$ | 21.10 | 805,852 | \$ | 20.51 |
| Exercised | (165,017) | 20.67 | (500,232) | 20.22 | ||
| Forfeited | (9,996) | 19.56 | (30,908) | 19.88 | ||
| Outstanding, December 31 | 99,699 | \$ | 21.94 | 274,712 | \$ | 21.10 |
| Exercisable at December 31: | ||||||
| Shares | 99,699 | 274,712 | ||||
| Range of exercise prices | \$20.46-\$22.27 | \$19.45-\$22.27 | ||||
| Weighted average life | .3 year | 1 year | ||||
| Unilever PLC ADRs | ||||||
| Outstanding, January 1 | 265,803 | \$ | 21.01 | 817,149 | \$ | 20.38 |
| Exercised | (161,129) | 20.84 | (521,307) | 20.13 | ||
| Forfeited | (11,829) | 20.34 | (30,039) | 19.16 | ||
| Outstanding, December 31 | 92,845 | \$ | 21.39 | 265,803 | \$ | 21.01 |
| Exercisable at December 31: | ||||||
| Shares | 92,845 | 265,803 | ||||
| Range of exercise prices | \$19.72-\$21.89 | \$19.47-\$21.89 | ||||
| Weighted average life | .3 year | 1 year |
The Company files taxes in the United States at the Federal level as part of a consolidated group and is able to utilize any losses. The tax expense (benefit) recognized in 2013 and 2012 are as follows:
| \$ thousands | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2013 | 2012 | |
| (103,644) | (54,477) | |
| 3,649 | (3,182) | |
| (99,995) | (57,659) | |
The reconciliation between the statutory tax rates and the effective tax rate charged is as follows:
| % | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| 2013 | 2012 | ||
| Federal tax rate | 35.0 | 35.0 | |
| Differences due to: | |||
| Non-deductible expenses | (0.1) | 0.1 | |
| State taxes | 2.8 | (0.5) | |
| Non-taxable dividends | - | (42.4) | |
| Effective tax rate | 37.7 | (7.8) |
Deferred tax movements in 2013 are as follows:
| \$ thousands | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| January 1, | Profit | December 31, | |||
| 2013 | and Loss | OCI | 2013 | ||
| Pension and similar obligations | 30,608 | (648) | (5,165) | 24,795 | |
| Share based compensation | 25,477 | (3,144) | - | 22,333 | |
| Other | (670) | 143 | - | (527) | |
| 55,415 | (3,649) | (5,165) | 46,601 |
Deferred tax to be settled after 12 months at December 31, 2013 and 2012 is \$46,106 thousand and \$55,150 thousand, respectively.
Deferred tax movements in 2012 are as follows:
| \$ thousands | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| January 1, 2012 |
Profit and Loss |
OCI | December 31, 2012 |
|||
| Pension and similar obligations Share based compensation Other |
31,822 21,700 (500) |
(425) 3,777 (170) |
(789) - - |
30,608 25,477 (670) |
||
| 53,022 | 3,182 | (789) | 55,415 |
In accordance with IAS 12- Income taxes, deferred tax liabilities are not recorded with respect to the outside basis differences for investments in subsidiaries, where the Company is in a position to control the timing of the reversal of the temporary difference and it is probable that such difference will not reverse in the foreseeable future. The Company has determined that it is impractical to determine the amount of taxes that would be payable if the temporary differences were to reverse. Based on the assumption of nominal tax bases in the investments in subsidiaries the deferred tax liabilities related to the outside basis difference would be approximately \$11 billion as of December 31, 2013 and 2012.
At December 31, 2013 UNUS had unused state tax losses of \$15.9 million. Deferred tax assets have not been recognized on these losses as it is not probable that there will be future taxable profit against which the losses can be utilized. These losses begin to expire in 2033.
Related parties include people and entities that have or are subject to the influence or control of the UNUS Group or the Unilever Group.
The Company provides administrative services to entities in the UNUS Group and receives administrative and other services from the Unilever Group. All balances with Unilever Group and UNUS Group entities are uncollateralized and interest bearing. It is to charge interest on all intercompany debt. During each of the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012 interest on intercompany debt ranged from 1.6 percent to 3.5 percent.
The Company has provided Conopco with two unsecured, non-interest bearing lines of credit totaling \$9.5 million to fund the environmental remediation of two sites in New Jersey. The letters of credit automatically renew on an annual basis and can only be terminated by the Company with the permission of the New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection. There were no amounts outstanding under either line of credit as of December 31, 2013 and 2012 and January 1, 2012 or during the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012.
All balances due to and from affiliates within the UNUS Group are presented as a single net amount in the statements of financial position as the Company has both the legal right and the intent to offset amounts due to and from these affiliates.
Amounts owed to and from different affiliates within the Unilever Group are presented separately in the statement of financial position as these amounts are settled on a current basis. Where the Company has the legal right of offset, amounts due to and from the same affiliate within the Unilever Group but outside the UNUS Group have been presented on a net basis.
Net amounts owed to UNUS Group affiliates at December 31, 2013 and 2012 and January 1, 2012 total \$7.7 billion, \$5.9 billion and \$4.5 billion, respectively. Net amounts owed from Unilever Group affiliates at December 31, 2013 and 2012 and January 1, 2012 total \$4.0 million, \$6.1 million and \$12.7 million, respectively. Net interest expense on affiliate debt totaled \$252 million and \$142 million for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively.
A summary of amounts comprising the income (expense) net of rebilling for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012 follows:
| \$ thousands | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| 2013 | 2012 | ||
| Compensation (Note 4) | 55,681 | 72,952 | |
| Non personnel costs | 25,417 | 26,035 | |
| 81,098 | 98,987 | ||
| Amounts rebilled to affiliates | (71,934) | (88,699) | |
| Expense, net of rebilling | 9,164 | 10,288 |
Dividends paid to Unilever Group totaled \$1.4 billion and \$2.1 billion for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively.
The Company is the guarantor of debt issued by Unilever N.V, and Unilever PLC. In addition, the Company guarantees certain debt of its subsidiaries. The guarantees generally require performance in the event of a default under the terms of the debt agreements. The Company considers the possibility of default remote and therefore has not reflected any liabilities associated with these guarantees in the financial statements. The outstanding amounts of these guarantees as of December 31, 2013 and 2012 and January 1, 2012 are summarized following:
| \$ thousands | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| December 31, | January 1. | ||
| 2013 | 2012 | 2012 | |
| Debt of subsidiaries | 14,262,000 | 15,283,000 | 15,370,000 |
| Debt of Ultimate Parent | 6,088,000 | 4,349,000 | 6,763,000 |
| Total guarantees | 20,350,000 | 19,632,000 | 22,133,000 |
Financial assets at December 31, 2013 and 2012 and January 1, 2012 are comprised of the following:
| \$ thousands | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| December 31, | January 1, | |||||
| 2013 | 2012 | 2012 | ||||
| Non | Non | Non | ||||
| Current | current | Current | current | Current | current | |
| Cash in bank | 130 | 221 | 344 | |||
| Funds in escrow | - | - | - | 6,544 | - | 6,544 |
| Equity shares of | ||||||
| Ultimate Parent | 1,675 | - | 272 | - | 937 | - |
| 1,805 | - | 493 | 6,544 | 1,281 | 6,544 |
Cash and cash equivalents at December 31, 2013 and 2012 and January 1, 2012 are all considered current assets and consist of cash in bank.
ies consist of trade payables and amounts due to affiliated entities discussed in Notes 14 and 8, respectively.
of shares of the Ultimate Parent (Unilever N.V and Unilever PLC). The value of such shares as of December 31, 2013 and 2012 and January 1, 2012 totals \$1,675 thousand, \$272 thousand and \$937 thousand, respectively. These assets are classified in the Level 1 fair value hierarchy quoted prices for identical instruments.
Credit risk is the risk of financial loss if a counter-party fails to meet its contractual obligation. Credit risk related to cash and cash equivalents and funds in escrow is limited since the Company places its deposits in high-quality financial institutions and monitors those institutions on a regular basis. The Company does not require collateral from its financial institutions and has not suffered any losses.
As indicated in Note 1 the Company is a holding entity that provides management services to its subsidiaries. idends from these subsidiaries, the timing of which is initiated by management of companies in the UNUS Group. The Company has no line of credit. As such, the Company is dependent upon its subsidiaries to provide it with financing, in the form of inter-company loans, to enable it to satisfy its obligations to unrelated parties as they come due. While amounts due to affiliated entities are considered demand debt, the timing of the settlement of any significant balance would need to be agreed with management of companies in the UNUS Group or the Unilever Group. Substantially all of it is not expected to be settled in the near term. Furthermore, the Company has an unrestricted ability to withdraw funds from its subsidiaries.
Due to the nature UN The Company is exposed to limited currency risk related to obligations to foreign, third party vendors. The Company has interest rate risk due to the amount of inter-company debt on its balance sheet. A 50 basis point increase (decrease) in interest rates would result in an increase (decrease) in finance charges on amounts due to affiliated entities by approximately \$34 million (\$34 million) based on the average amounts outstanding for the year ended December 31, 2013.
The Company does not have any derivative financial instruments.
Prepaid expenses are recorded at amortized cost and consist of the following:
| \$ thousands | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| December 31, | |||
| 2013 | 2012 | 2012 | |
| Non-current: | |||
| Software costs | 973 | 2,637 | 4,306 |
| Other | 728 | 944 | 2,946 |
| 1,701 | 3,581 | 7,252 | |
| Current: | |||
| Insurance | 3,970 | 2,636 | 2,352 |
| Duty and taxes | 8,996 | 12,387 | - |
| Other | 2,597 | 64 | 871 |
| 15,563 | 15,087 | 3,223 | |
| 17,264 | 18,668 | 10,475 |
In 2012 the Company changed its policy for settling payroll tax and other withholdings within the UNUS Group.
The Company considers total equity (share capital, share premium and retained earnings) to be part of managed capital. The primary goal of capital management is to achieve the Ultimate entity continues as a going concern and optimizing returns to the Ultimate amounts of capital as of December 31, 2013 and 2012 and January 1, 2012 is as follows:
| \$ thousands | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Authorized | Issued | ||
| Preferred \$73.50 par | 7,350 | - | |
| Common \$.333 par | 3 | 1 | |
| 7,353 | 1 |
As of December 31, 2013, and 2012 and January 1, 2012 the entity had authorized Preferred and Common shares of 100,000 and 10,000, respectively. At December 31, 2013 and 2012 and January 1, 2012 the Company had 3,155 Common shares outstanding; no preferred shares have been issued.
The following summarizes current trade and other payables which are initially recorded at fair value and subsequently carried at amortized cost:
| \$ thousands | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| December 31, | ||||
| 2013 | 2012 | January 1, 2012 |
||
| Employee benefits and | ||||
| withholding taxes | 32,962 | 32,242 | 10,118 | |
| Trade payables | 5,728 | 7,127 | 4,984 | |
| Other | 6,618 | 7,454 | 2,489 | |
| 45,308 | 46,823 | 17,591 |
The fair value of trade payables approximates carrying value. The increase in employee benefits and withholding taxes from 2011 to 2012 is due to a change in Company policy for settling payroll tax and other withholdings within the UNUS Group (Note 12.)
A 1997 stock sale of certain Company subsidiaries triggered the New Jersey Industrial Site Recovery Act ( ISRA ). Pursuant to ISRA and its implementing regulations, the Company was obligated to establish a financial assurance in connection with its ISRA obligations to investigate and, if necessary, remediate the industrial establishments that were sold. As such, the Company established a \$7 million At December 31, 2013 and 2012 and January 1, 2012 amounts in the trust fund totaled \$0, \$6.5 million and \$6.5 million, respectively.
The New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection ( NJDEP ) is the beneficiary of the Trust and, all earnings of the fund are added to the corpus and are not available to the Company except as determined by the NJDEP and the applicable regulatory provisions.
In light of changes to the regulatory provisions governing financial assurance obligations and, recognizing the degree of remedial work that had been completed at the involved sites, in 2013, the NJDEP authorized the Company to terminate the original Trust Agreement and create two separate Trust Agreements for the two remaining sites requiring remediation. As such, the original Trust was terminated and the funds were returned to the Company. Thereafter, (in e created; one funded at \$2.275 million and, the second funded at \$302 thousand.
The Company reflected a \$2.6 million, \$.85 million and \$1.0 million provision related to these environmental issues as of December 31, 2013 and 2012 and January 1, 2012, respectively included in other non-current liabilities in the statement of financial position. Amounts charged to profit and loss in 2013 and 2012 related to site remediation totaled \$2.4 million and \$0, respectively. Changes in provisions as of and for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012 follow:
| \$ thousands | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2013 | 2012 | |||
| Balance, January 1 | 847 | 1,013 | ||
| Current year expense | 2,401 | - | ||
| Payments | (673) | (166) | ||
| Balance, December 31 | 2,575 | 847 |
The Company is indirectly involved in legal proceedings that have arisen through the normal course of business in its operating subsidiaries. The majority of these matters relate to consumer product liability, allegedly deceptive advertising and environmental remediation liability issues . In many of these matters the Company is named as a defendant. While the Company is named as a defendant in such matters, the Company does not believe it is probable that the settlement or other resolution of legal obligations related to such matters will result in an outflow of economic benefits from the Company. Provisions for liabilities related to these matters, if any, are recorded in the financial statements of the individual operating subsidiaries and are not considered material to those entities operations.
Subsequent to December 31, 2013 the Company deposited \$2.577 million into two escrow accounts for the purpose of remediating an environmental issue (Note 15). No other events have occurred after the reporting period which requires disclosure in or adjustment to the financial statements.
The financial statements were approved by management and authorized for release on April 4, 2014.
Building tools?
Free accounts include 100 API calls/year for testing.
Have a question? We'll get back to you promptly.