AI Terminal

MODULE: AI_ANALYST
Interactive Q&A, Risk Assessment, Summarization
MODULE: DATA_EXTRACT
Excel Export, XBRL Parsing, Table Digitization
MODULE: PEER_COMP
Sector Benchmarking, Sentiment Analysis
SYSTEM ACCESS LOCKED
Authenticate / Register Log In

Workspace Group PLC

Investor Presentation Sep 30, 2013

5282_ip_2013-09-30_fe53bbfe-bf20-4b52-b9ca-797bd62562d4.pdf

Investor Presentation

Open in Viewer

Opens in native device viewer

INVESTOR AND ANALYST PRESENTATION 12 NOVEMBER 2013

WORKSPACE INTERIM RESULTS MOMENTUM MAINTAINED

WORKSPACE

Jamie Hopkins Chief Executive Officer

PERFORMANCE

Graham Clemett Chief Financial Officer

DIRECTION

Jamie Hopkins Chief Executive Officer

QUESTIONS

Sept 2013 March 2013 Change
£45.9m £44.2m +4%
£14.37 £14.00 +3%
90.9% 89.9% Up 1.0%
£921m £830m +12%*
£4.04 £3.48 +16%
Sept 2013 Sept 2012 Change
£9.7m £8.8m +10%
3.54p 3.22p +10%

Note

* Underlying increase

** Excluding exceptional interest costs and other income/(expenses)

Income Statement Sept 2013 Sept 2012 Change
Total Profit before Tax £100.8m £24.6m x4
Net Rental income £24.4m £23.2m +5%
Trading Profit After Interest** £9.7m £8.8m +10%
Adjusted EPRA Earnings Per Share** 6.6p 5.9p +12%
Interim Dividend (per share) 3.54p 3.22p +10%
Balance Sheet Sept 2013 March 2013 Change
Portfolio Valuation £921m £830m +12%*
EPRA NAV (per share) £4.04 £3.48 +16%
Loan to Value 35% 40% Down 5%
Debt Maturity Profile 7.3 years 2.9 years Up 4.4 yrs

* Underlying increase

** Excluding exceptional interest costs and other income/(expenses)

PERFORMANCE TRADING PROFIT AFTER INTEREST

PERFORMANCE RENT ROLL GROWTH

REFURBISHMENTS

REDEVELOPMENTS

PERFORMANCE REFURBISHMENT PROJECTS

Projects Current
Rent Roll
Future
Capex
Upgraded
Space
New Space Potential
Future Rent
Completed 6 £2.8m* £0m 91,000 69,000 £4.0m
Construction 2 £0.9m £11m 82,000 62,000 £3.7m
Design Stage 6 £1.5m** £54m 30,000 180,000 £6.0m

+£8.5m

Note

  • * Excludes £2.3m of rent not impacted by refurbishment
  • ** Currently reported in like-for-like category

Additional detail set out in Appendix I

PERFORMANCE COMPLETED REFURBISHMENTS

PERFORMANCE REDEVELOPMENT PROJECTS

Schemes Current
Value
Current
Rent Roll
Residential
Units
Business
Space
Potential
Future
Rent
Other
Underway 5 £122m £1.4m 1,493 231,000 £4.6m £73m cash
+ overage
With Planning 3 830 163,000
Planning
Stage
4 702 90,000

PERFORMANCE REFURBISHMENT & REDEVELOPMENT RENT ROLL ESTIMATES

REFURBISHMENTS REDEVELOPMENTS UNDERWAY

PERFORMANCE CASH FLOW

£m
Trading
Net cash from operations 11
Dividends paid (10) 1
Investment
Capital Expenditure (14)
Disposals/Capital Receipts 21 7
Financing
Cancellation of hedging contracts (9)
Release of secured bank facility funds 7 (5)
Refinancing costs (3)
Net movement in six months 3
Net Debt at March 2013 (327)
Net Debt at September 2013 (324)

PERFORMANCE BALANCE SHEET

Sept 2013 March 2013
£921m £830m
£22m £21m
(£324m) (£327m)
(£7m) £0m
(£23m) (£24m)
£589m £500m
£4.04 £3.48
35% 40%
£86m £55m

PERFORMANCE DEBT ANALYSIS

Sept 2013 March 2013
Net Debt £324m £327m
Total Facilities £410m £383m
Secured Facilities 0% 85%
Average Borrowing Cost 5.3% 5.0%

FACILITIES BY TYPE MATURITY PROFILE

PERFORMANCE GLEBE PROCEEDS SHARE

  • Portfolio acquired in December 2009 for £15m cash (plus £68m of stapled debt)
  • Portfolio now valued at £199m, plus £12m cash received from disposals
  • Workspace retains all rental income (currently £7m pa)
  • Proceeds share in place with former lenders, no time limits
  • Net cash proceeds from any disposals to be allocated as follows:
Net Proceeds Workspace Former lenders
Up to £92m 100% (£92m) 0% (£0m)
£92m to £170m 50% (£39m) 50% (£39m)
£170m to £200m 70% (£21m) 30% (£9m)
Over £200m 100% 0%

• Maximum proceeds share to former lenders £48m (£39m + £9m)

PERFORMANCE GLEBE PROCEEDS SHARE

£m Sept 2013 March 2013
Glebe Portfolio Value (including disposal proceeds) £211m £164m
Comprising:
Investment Properties, no plans to sell £99m £81m
Properties with residential sales potential/sold £112m £83m
Net proceeds after estimated sales costs £106m £79m
Proceeds Share:
Workspace £99m £79m
Former lenders £7m £0m

Provision of £7m for Glebe Proceeds Share at 30 September 2013

At 30 September 2013 Core Refurbishment Redevelopment Other Total
Number of properties 48 8 9 18 83
Valuation £557m £125m £188m £51m £921m
Revaluation surplus in
six months
£38m £4m £52m £2m £96m
Net Initial Yield 7.1%
Rent per sq. ft. £14.86
Capital Value per sq. ft. £182

Disposals in Period

Number of properties 1 3 4
Proceeds £12m £8m £20m

VERULAM HOUSE, GRAYS INN ROAD, WC1

VERULAM HOUSE, GRAYS INN ROAD, WC1

RATIONALE

  • Core midtown location: Crossrail
  • Good strategic fit: cluster efficiencies
  • Strong customer demand: in-house data
  • Optimal floor configuration: unit sizing
  • Operational benefits: Hatton de-cant
  • Large surface car park: future opportunities
  • Under-managed and under-rented

FINANCIALS

  • £18.1m
  • £433 per sq. ft. capital value
  • Minimal day one expenditure
  • Fully occupied by 7 customers
  • Average rent currently £26 per sq. ft.

SCAN THE CODE BELOW TO WATCH OUR INVESTOR AND ANALYST PRESENTATION VIDEO:

OR VISIT: INVESTORS.WORKSPACE.CO.UK/ABOUT-US/MEDIA-CENTRE/ANALYST-PRESENTATIONS/

APPENDIX I

REFURBISHMENT PROJECTS

Project Stage September
2013
Valuation
Expected
Cost
Cost to
Complete
Completion Upgraded
area
(Expected)
New
space
(Expected)
Project
ERV
(Average)
Updated
ERV
(Average)
Expected
rent at 90%
occupancy
Completed/Letting
Canalot
Studios
Sept 2012 32,702 16,268 £24 £27 £1.2m
Whitechapel Oct 2012 - 6,532 £21 £22 £0.1m
Chester House (phase 2) March 2013 - 8,903 £30 £34 £0.3m
Leyton l (phase
1)
April 2013 - 26,600 £12 £12 £0.3m
Westminster (phase 1) August 2013 5,599 4,464 £28 £28 £0.3m
Exmouth House August 2013 52,896 5,936 £28 £34 £1.8m
Space not impacted by
refurbishment
- - - - - £2.3m
£87m 91,197 68,703 £6.3m
Construction
Metal Box Factory £15m £9m H1 2014 82,000 20,000 £28 £30 £2.8m
The Pill Box £9m £2m H1 2014 - 42,000 £22 £24 £0.9m
£38m £24m £11m 82,000 62,000 £3.7m
Design (with planning)
Bounds Green £1m 2014 - 14,000 £11 £0.2m
Leyton (phase 2) £2m 2014 - 21,000 £12 £0.2m
Baldwins Gardens £21m 2015 - 64,000 £40 £2.3m
Barley Mow Centre £7m 2015 - 20,000 £30 £0.5m
Linton House £7m 2015 30,000 16,000 £37 £1.6m
Westminster (phase 2) £16m 2015 - 45,000 £30 £1.2m
£54m 30,000 180,000 £6.0m

APPENDIX II

REDEVELOPMENT PROJECTS

Project Stage Development
partner
September
Expected
2013 Valuation
completion
Residential
units
Commercial space Other proceeds
No. Area Rent* Cash Overage
Underway
The Filaments (phase 1) Mount Anvil H2 2014 209 53,000 £1.0m n/a
Screenworks Taylor
Wimpey
H1 2014 72 61,000 £1.4m £4.8m
Grand Union Taylor
Wimpey
H2 2015 145 60,000 £1.2m £5.9m
Bow (phase 1) Peabody H2 2015 267 10,000 £0.2m £11.5m
The Biscuit Factory Grosvenor 2017 800 47,000 £0.8m £51.0m
£122m 1,493 231,000 £4.6m £73.2m
With Planning
Faircharm 2015-2016 148 52,000
Bow (phase 2) 2016 290 41,000
Poplar 2017 392 70,000
830 163,000
At Planning Stage (Indicative scaling)
Marshgate 300 8,000
The Filaments (phase 2) 72 15,000
Rainbow 200 34,000
Highway 130 33,000
702 90,000

* Expected Rent at 90% occupancy

APPENDIX III UNDERSTANDING CUSTOMERS

APPENDIX IV UNDERSTANDING CUSTOMERS

APPENDIX V UNDERSTANDING OUR CUSTOMERS

MARKETING STRATEGIES

BILLBOARDS & SIGNAGE 10,000 SQ. FT. ACROSS LONDON

LOCAL MAIL & E-SHOTS RETAIL & LEISURE LINKS TRANSPORT HUBS

WEBSITE

467,000 VISITS HEAT MAPPING SEARCH ENGINE OPTIMISATION PPC (PAY PER CLICK) EFFICIENCY TRACKING AND FOLLOW UP SOCIAL MEDIA STRATEGY

TELEPHONE 14,000 CALLS

EVENTS 75 CUSTOMER EVENTS 3,000 ATTENDEES

REFERRALS & RECOMMENDATIONS 82% CUSTOMER SATISFACTION

PR AND MEDIA COVERAGE

RESULT

INCREASED INCOME

DATA AND KNOWLEDGE

INTIMATE UNDERSTANDING

This presentation contains forward looking statements. Although the Group believes that the estimates and assumptions on which such statements are based are reasonable, they are inherently uncertain and involve a number of risks and uncertainties that are beyond the Group's control. The Group does not make any representation or warranty that the results anticipated by such forward looking statements will be achieved and this presentation should not be relied upon as a guide to future performance.

Talk to a Data Expert

Have a question? We'll get back to you promptly.