Annual / Quarterly Financial Statement • Apr 17, 2020
Annual / Quarterly Financial Statement
Open in ViewerOpens in native device viewer

Standard Bank Group
Standard Bank Group
Standard Bank Group
ANNUAL FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 2019
ANNUAL FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 2019
The preparation of The Standard Bank Group Limited (SBGL) consolidated and separate annual financial statements was supervised by the group financial director, Arno Daehnke BSc, MSc, PhD, MBA, AMP.
A summary of these results was made publicly available on 5 March 2020.
| THIS REPORT | ||
|---|---|---|
| INTENDED READERS Our shareholders, debt providers and regulators |
ANNUAL FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Sets out the group's full audited annual financial statements, including the report of the group audit committee. |
AFS |
| Primarily investors but relevant to all our stakeholders |
ANNUAL INTEGRATED REPORT Provides a holistic assessment of our ability to create sustainable value in the short, medium and long term. |
AIR |
| Our shareholders, debt providers and regulators |
GOVERNANCE AND REMUNERATION REPORT Discusses the group's governance and remuneration priorities, as well as the group's remuneration policy and implementation report. The invitation to the annual general meeting (AGM) and notice of resolutions to be tabled is sent separately to shareholders and is available online. |
GOV REM |
| Our shareholders, debt providers and regulators |
RISK AND CAPITAL MANAGEMENT REPORT Sets out the group's approach to risk management, including our risk universe. |
RCM |
| Our clients, employees and society more broadly |
REPORTING TO SOCIETY SUITE The report to society (RTS) explains how we contribute to the group's ability to achieve its purpose through our SEE impact. Our environmental, social and governance (ESG) report provides an overview of the processes and governance structures the group has in place to support our commitment to do the right business, the right way. The reporting to society suite also includes our South African |
RTS |
transformation report.
Our subsidiary stakeholders
To account to their stakeholders, our subsidiaries produce their own annual reports and audited annual financial statements, which are available on their respective websites.
| AIR | GOV REM |
RCM | AFS | RTS | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Frameworks applied | |||||
| The International Integrated Reporting |
|||||
| Companies Act, No 71 of 2008, as amended (Companies Act) | |||||
| Johannesburg Stock Exchange (JSE) Listings Requirements | |||||
| King IV™ Report on Corporate Governance for South Africa 2016* | |||||
| International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) | |||||
| South African Banks Act 94 of 1990 (Banks Act) | |||||
| Basel Committee on Banking Supervision's public disclosure framework | |||||
| CDP (previously Carbon Disclosure Project) | |||||
| United Nations (UN) Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) | |||||
| Assurance | |||||
| Certain information extracted from audited reports | |||||
| Unmodified audit opinion expressed by KPMG Inc. and PricewaterhouseCoopers Inc. | |||||
| Selected information assured by PricewaterhouseCoopers Inc. |
* Also known as the King Code and King IVTM. Copyright and trademarks are owned by the Institute of Directors in Southern Africa NPC and all of its rights are reserved.

All our reports and latest financial results presentations, booklets and SENS announcements are available online, together with financial and other definitions, acronyms and abbreviations used. We urge our stakeholders to make use of our reporting site at https:// reporting.standardbank.com/
to assist in the reduction of our carbon footprint.
The following icons refer readers to information across our suite of reports:

Refers readers to information elsewhere in this report.
Refers readers to information in our other reports, which are available online.
At the time of writing this report, COVID-19 had begun spreading more rapidly across the world. Its impact on our communities and business activities is still being quantified. We intend to include these impacts into our strategy and short- and long-term budget plans.
In accordance with the Companies Act, the directors are responsible for the preparation of the annual financial statements. These annual financial statements conform to IFRS as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB), the South African Institute of Chartered Accountants' (SAICA) Financial Reporting Guides as issued by the Accounting Practices Committee, the JSE Listings Requirements, and fairly present the affairs of SBGL and Standard Bank Group (SBG) as at 31 December 2019, and the net income and cash flows for the year then ended.
The directors are ultimately responsible for the internal controls of the company and the group. Management enables the directors to meet these responsibilities. Standards and systems of internal controls are designed, implemented and monitored by management to provide reasonable assurance of the integrity and reliability of the financial statements and to adequately safeguard, verify and maintain accountability for shareholder investments and company and group assets. Systems and controls include the proper delegation of responsibilities within a clearly defined framework, effective accounting procedures and adequate segregation of duties. It is the responsibility of the independent auditors to report on the fair presentation of the financial statements.
Based on the information and explanations provided by management and the group's internal auditors, the directors are of the opinion that the internal financial controls are adequate and that the financial records may be relied upon for preparing the financial statements in accordance with IFRS and to maintain accountability for the company and the group's assets and liabilities. Nothing has come to the attention of the directors to indicate that a breakdown in the functioning of these controls, resulting in material loss to the company and the group, has occurred during the year and up to the date of this report.
The directors have a reasonable expectation that the company and the group will have adequate resources to continue in operational existence and as a going concern in the financial year ahead. The 2019 annual financial statements which appear on pages 20 to 230 were approved by the board on 4 March 2020 and signed on its behalf by:
4 March 2020 4 March 2020
In terms of the Companies Act and for the year ended 31 December 2019, I certify that Standard Bank Group Limited has filed all returns and notices required by the Companies Act with the Companies and Intellectual Property Commission and that all such returns and notices are true, correct and up to date.
Zola Stephen Group secretary 4 March 2020
This report is provided by the group audit committee, in respect of the 2019 financial year of Standard Bank Group Limited, in compliance with section 94 of the Companies Act, as amended from time to time, and in terms of the JSE Listings Requirements. The committee's operation is guided by a detailed mandate that is informed by the Companies Act, the Banks Act, the JSE Listings Requirements and the King IV Code on Corporate Governance and is approved by the board. Section 94(2) of the Companies Act determines that, at each annual general meeting, a public company must elect an audit committee comprising at least three members. In view of the exemption granted in section 94(1), this section does not apply to the group audit committee and, accordingly, the appointment of its members is approved annually by the board.
The committee comprises six independent non-executive directors. All members have the necessary financial literacy, skills and experience to execute their duties effectively. To ensure that risk-related matters of relevance to the audit committee are considered, the chairman is a member of and attended the group risk and capital management committee meetings held during the financial year. John Vice and Peter Sullivan, both independent non-executive directors and chairmen of the group technology and information committee and group remuneration committee respectively, are both members of the group audit committee, which further enhances collective and integrated oversight and ensures that key matters are considered in the respective committees' deliberations. All members were present for all meetings held during 2019.
The committee met eight times during 2019, including two meetings to consider quarterly financial results for publication on SENS and the annual meeting with the Prudential Authority of the SARB.

Information on the committee's role and responsibilities; its composition, including members' qualifications and experience; the date of members' appointment to the committee; the number of meetings held during the year and attendance at those meetings; as well as key areas of focus during the reporting period is provided in greater detail in the corporate governance statement which is included in the group's governance and remuneration report available at www.standardbank.com/reporting.
The audit committee has executed its duties and responsibilities during the financial year in accordance with its mandate as it relates to the group's accounting, internal and external auditing, compliance, internal control and financial reporting practices.
During the year under review, the committee, among other, considered the following:
As part of the group audit committee's responsibilities, notably its review of financial results, reports from internal and external audit, finance and internal financial control reports, the group's accounting policies, as well as the annual financial statements, the audit committee took cognisance of the key audit matters as reported in the independent auditors' report. In addition, the audit committee reviewed management's judgements on significant accounting and external reporting issues and confirmed external audit's agreement with the treatment thereof.
• reviewed management's process and progress with respect to new financial accounting and reporting developments.
The audit committee is satisfied that KPMG Inc. and PricewaterhouseCoopers Inc. are independent of the group and that KPMG Inc. and PricewaterhouseCoopers Inc. and the partners who are responsible for signing the group's financial statements have the requisite skills and expertise. This conclusion was arrived at, inter alia, after considering the following factors:
The audit committee noted the Independent Regulatory Board for Auditors' announcement of its Mandatory Audit Firm Rotation (MAFR) ruling on 2 June 2016 which determined that an audit firm may not be appointed auditor of a public interest entity for more than ten years. As a result, the group would, at a minimum, be required to rotate one of the audit firms for its 2024 financial year end, and the other for its 2026 financial year.
In conclusion, the audit committee is satisfied that it has fulfilled its responsibilities and complied with its legal, regulatory and governance responsibilities as set out in its mandate.
On behalf of the group audit committee:
Trix Kennealy Chairman 2 March 2020
for the year ended 31 December 2019
Standard Bank Group Limited is the holding company for the interests of the group, an African financial services organisation with South African roots. It is South Africa's largest banking group by assets and currently operates in 20 countries in sub-Saharan Africa. Our strategic position enables us to connect Africa to other selected emerging markets and pools of capital in developed markets.
Headquartered in Johannesburg, South Africa, the group's primary listing is on the JSE and its secondary listings on A2X Markets and the Namibian Stock Exchange (NSX). Subsidiary entities are listed on exchanges in Kenya, Malawi, Namibia, Nigeria and Uganda.
A simplified group organogram with principal subsidiaries is shown in annexure A.
Group headline earnings and headline earnings per share increased by 1% to R28 207 million (2018: R27 865) and 1% to 1 766.7 cents (2018: 1 748.4 cents) respectively. Net asset value per share increased to 10 742 cents (2018: 10 380 cents) and group return on equity decreased to 16.8% (2018: 18.0%). A final dividend of 540 cents per share has been declared bringing the total dividend declared for the year to 994 cents per share (2018: 970 cents per share).
During the year, 1 195 330 (2018: 1 729 572) ordinary shares were issued in terms of the group's equity compensation plans, notably the Equity Growth Scheme (EGS) and Group Share Incentive Scheme (GSIS). No surplus capital was used to purchase ordinary shares in 2019 (2018: 2 483 523) to counteract the dilutive impact of the shares issued under the equity compensation plans. Effective from 2017, the group no longer issues EGS and GSIS awards. Awards are now provided in terms of the group's other share schemes, notably the Deferred Bonus Scheme and the Share Appreciation Rights Plan, both of which are settled by the group to employees with shares that the group purchases from the open market participants, and the Cash Settled Deferred Bonus Scheme, which is settled in cash (refer to Annexure D: Group share incentive schemes for further information). At the end of the year, the group would need to issue 1 485 507 (2018: 2 847 244), SBG ordinary shares to settle the outstanding GSIS options and EGS rights that were awarded to participants in previous years. The shares issued since inception for the EGS and GSIS together with the expected number of shares to settle the outstanding options and rights as a percentage of the total number of shares in issue is 2.1% (2018: 2.1%).
The address of the registered office is, 9th Floor, Standard Bank Centre, 5 Simmonds Street, Johannesburg 2001.
The group protects itself against financial loss by maintaining bankers' comprehensive crime and professional indemnity cover. The insurance terms and conditions are reviewed by the group insurance committee annually to ensure they are 'fit-for-purpose' against the group's risk exposures.
Shareholders at the close of the financial year, holding beneficial interests in excess or equal to 5% of the company's issued share capital, determined from the share register and investigations conducted on the group's behalf, were as follows:
| % held | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | 2018 | ||
| Ordinary shares Industrial and Commercial Bank of China Limited |
|||
| (ICBC) | 20.1 | 20.1 | |
| Government Employees Pension Fund (PIC) |
13.3 | 12.4 | |
| 6.5% preference shares | |||
| L Lombard | 12.0 | 12.0 | |
| Old Sillery Proprietary | |||
| Limited | 9.1 | 9.1 | |
| DJ Saks | 7.5 | 7.5 | |
| MT Goulding | 12.9 | 8.6 | |
| AP Macdonald | 5.4 | 1.1 | |
| JIR Campbell | 5.3 | ||
| The Spiz Family Trust | 8.0 | ||
| Non-cumulative preference | |||
| shares Prescient Inc. Provider Fund |
8.2 | 7.4 | |
Other banking interest
In November 2012, the group completed the disposal of a controlling interest in each of Industrial and Commercial Bank of China (Argentina) S.A. (previously Standard Bank Argentina S.A.), ICBC Investments Argentina S.A. Sociedad Gerente de Fondos Comunes de Inversión (previously Standard Investments S.A. Sociedad Gerente de Fondos Comunes de Inversión) and Inversora Diagonal S.A. (collectively ICBCA) to ICBC.
The group retained a 20% shareholding in ICBCA, held by Standard Bank Group's wholly owned subsidiary, Standard Bank London Holdings Limited. This residual investment was classified as an investment in associate and accounted for using the equity accounting method in terms of IAS 28 Investments in Associates and Joint Ventures(IAS 28).
In the ICBCA shareholders' agreement, Industrial and Commercial Bank of China (ICBC) granted a put option to the group under which the group was given the right to sell its remaining shareholding in ICBCA to ICBC, by giving notice at any time between 1 December 2014 and 30 November 2019. The strike price of the put option is fixed at USD181 million. Having taken the independent advice required under the JSE Listings Requirements, on 8 August 2019, the group exercised the put option and gave the required notice to ICBC. The transaction is subject to conditions precedent customary to transactions of this nature, including regulatory approvals in China. The completion date in respect of the transaction is anticipated to be in the first half of 2020. The group would seek to reinvest net proceeds received at completion of the transaction to support its African strategy.
Based on the above, the requirements of IFRS 5 Non-current Assets Held for Sale and Discontinued Operations (IFRS 5), were met and equity accounting of this investment was ceased at the end of August 2019. Therefore, as at 31 December 2019, the investment in ICBCA has been disclosed as non-current assets held for sale and presented separately on the statement of financial position. The investment in ICBCA is measured at the lower of the carrying amount and fair value less costs to sell, being R1 196 million at 31 December 2019. The investment in ICBCA was not impaired at date of classification as held for sale, nor at year end.
ICBCS, in which the group is a 40% shareholder, incurred a loss of USD248 million for the 2019 financial year, which includes losses and provisions relating to a single client loss, refer below for detail, of USD198 million and restructuring costs of USD30 million following the closure of certain regional offices and management actions to reduce operational costs.
The single client loss arose as a result of an explosion at the client's oil refinery and its subsequent bankruptcy in July 2019. This single client loss includes estimates of the prices that will be achieved on disposal of remaining inventory owned by ICBCS and any other costs that ICBCS will incur in extracting its remaining inventory from the oil refinery site and in terminating the transaction. Given the nature of these estimates, there is potential variability in the actual sale prices that will be achieved and additional costs that will be incurred. ICBCS is pursuing recovery of its losses by exercise of security rights and claims against the client's bankruptcy estate, including any recoveries under insurance policies maintained by the client in respect of its business and operations. Various other parties, including the client's term lenders, are seeking to recover losses they have incurred as a result of this incident from the client's bankruptcy estate. As a result, the timing and extent of any recovery of losses incurred by ICBCS on its inventory intermediation activities in 2019 remain uncertain and consequently no significant amount has been recognised at 31 December 2019.
Following a review of ICBCS's business model, the ICBCS board has taken actions to reduce costs and simplify ICBCS's business model and will focus on driving efficiencies through working more closely with ICBC. As at 31 December 2019, having issued additional tier 1 (AT1) capital to ICBC, ICBCS was sufficiently capitalised to meet its regulatory requirements and to support the business levels indicated in its business plan.
Given the significant losses suffered by ICBCS and the deterioration of market conditions, the group reviewed the recoverable amount of the associate investment at 30 September 2019. At that time, the group took into consideration available information, applying a value in use (VIU) approach in determining carrying value. Following this review, the group's carrying value in ICBCS was impaired from USD383 million to USD220 million with an impairment of R2.4 billion recognised in earnings attributable to ordinary shareholders.
At 31 December 2019, after further losses recorded by ICBCS in the fourth quarter of 2019, including restructuring provisions, the group's 40% associate investment in ICBCS was carried at USD189 million (R2.6 billion).
The group has assessed the recoverable amount of its investment in ICBCS at 31 December 2019, consistent with the approach used at 30 September 2019, and the group adopted a VIU approach to determine the recoverable amount utilising the latest available information at year end. Cash flow projections were based on future cash flows the group could derive from the investment, taking into consideration various scenarios. In addition, an appropriate discount rate of 9.8%, which reflects current market assessments of the time value of money and risks specific to ICBCS, was applied. Key inputs to the VIU include ICBCS management's most recent business plan projections. The VIU reflects the present value of the expected future cash flows and is based on the weighted average of potential business outcomes.
Based on the outcome of this analysis and the value derived, we conclude that the recoverable amount approximates carrying value and therefore no further impairment was recognised by the group at 31 December 2019. The group will continue to engage and work with ICBC and ICBCS to enable the business to generate acceptable returns.
The only legal exchange mechanism that Stanbic Bank Zimbabwe (SBZ) had access to in the financial period since the change in functional currency from United States dollar (USD) to Zimbabwean dollar (ZWL), on 1 October 2018, was ZWL as the official exchange mechanism. This led to SBZ concluding that the appropriate exchange rate to use at the date of the change in functional currency and subsequent to the change in functional currency up until the end of the 2018 reporting period was the official rate of 1:1.
The Reserve Bank of Zimbabwe (RBZ) implemented certain key monetary policy measures during February 2019. The most significant change was the establishment of a new foreign exchange interbank market and this interbank market will complement the existing official foreign exchange mechanism with the RBZ. The establishment of this interbank market has created an additional legal exchange mechanism whereby the bank is able to trade real-time gross settlement (RTGS) dollars (official currency). The starting rate of trade in this interbank market was 2.5 RTGS:USD. As at 31 December 2019, the rate deteriorated to 16.54 RTGS:USD from 1 RTGS:USD as at 31 December 2018, which resulted in a foreign currency translation reserve (FCTR) loss of R2.5 billion for the group, after the hyperinflation adjustment translation adjustment per IAS 21 The Effects of Changes in Foreign Exchange Rates(IAS 21) .
During 2019, the Zimbabwe year-on-year monthly inflation rate increased from 42% at the end of December 2018 to 521% at the end of December 2019. Therefore, SBZ is considered to be hyperinflationary as at 31 December 2019 and the results for SBZ were adjusted in accordance with IAS 29 Financial Reporting in Hyperinflationary Economies. This resulted in the group's profit attributable to ordinary shareholders for the period ended 31 December 2019 decreasing by R82 million and an increase in retained earnings of R730 million.
In Namibia, the group successfully completed the listing of its Namibian bank holding company, SBN Holdings Limited (SBNH) on the Namibian Stock Exchange (NSX) on 15 November 2019. As part of the public offer, SBNH raised equity of R200 million through an issue of ordinary shares, while Standard Bank Group Limited (SBGL) sold a portion of its stake in SBNH for a sale consideration of R522 million.
SBGL's legal shareholding in SBNH prior to the listing was 90%, but due to the degree of control SBGL retained over the shares of the empowerment structure, SBNH was consolidated at 100%, with the group accounting for the total SBNH earnings up until the listing. Post the listing, SBGL's legal shareholding in SBNH reduced from 90% to 74.9% and the empowerment structure's legal shareholding was diluted from 10% to 9.6% by the issue of ordinary shares. From the date of listing to 31 December 2019, SBNH remains consolidated, but with 84.5% of SBNH earnings attributable to ordinary shareholders and the remaining 15.5% of SBNH earnings attributable to non-controlling shareholders. The group recognised an increase in NCI of R617 million and a decrease in retained earnings and equity attributable to ordinary shareholders of R105 million due to the changes in the group's ownership interest in SBNH.
With effect from 1 January 2020, the restrictions on the allocated shares held within the empowerment structure expired and SBGL no longer retains control over those shares. Accordingly, while SBGL continues to consolidate SBNH from 1 January 2020, 74.9% of SBNH earnings are attributable to SBGL as controlling shareholder and the remaining 25.1% of SBNH earnings are attributable to non-controlling shareholders.
| Ordinary shares | 6.5% cumulative preference shares (first preference shares) |
Non-redeemable, non-cumulative, non-participating preference shares (second preference shares) |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Interim | |||
| 2018 | |||
| Dividend per share (cents) | 430 | 3.25 | 386.43 |
| 2019 | |||
| Dividend number | 100 | 100 | 30 |
| Dividend per share (cents) | 454 | 3.25 | 391.38 |
| Friday, | Friday, | Friday, | |
| Record date in respect of the cash dividend | 13 September 2019 | 6 September 2019 | 6 September 2019 |
| Dividend cheques posted and CSDP1 /broker accounts credited/updated (payment date) |
Monday, 16 September 2019 |
Monday, 9 September 2019 |
Monday, 9 September 2019 |
| Final | |||
| 2018 | |||
| Dividend per share (cents) | 540 | 3.25 | 390.22 |
| 2019 | |||
| Dividend number | 101 | 101 | 31 |
| Dividend per share (cents) | 540 | 3.25 | 389.12 |
| Record date in respect of the cash dividend | Friday, 24 April 2020 | Friday, 17 April 2020 | Friday, 17 April 2020 |
| Dividend cheques posted and CSDP1 /broker |
|||
| accounts credited/updated (payment date) | Tuesday, 28 April 2020 | Monday, 20 April 2020 | Monday, 20 April 2020 |
1 Central Securities Depository Participant.
The following changes in directorate took place from 1 January 2019 up to 5 March 2020:
| Appointments | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MA Erasmus | As non-executive director | 12 July 2019 | ||
| BP Mabelane | As non-executive director | 1 January 2020 | ||
| NMC Nyembezi | As non-executive director 1 January 2020 |
|||
| Resignations | ||||
| Dr H Hu | As joint deputy chairman | 25 February 2020 |
for the year ended 31 December 2019
We have audited the consolidated (the "Group") and separate ("the Company") financial statements of Standard Bank Group Limited, set out on pages 20 to 223 which comprise:
In our opinion, the consolidated and separate financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated and separate financial position of Standard Bank Group Limited as at 31 December 2019, and its consolidated and separate financial performance and consolidated and separate cash flows for the year then ended in accordance with IFRS and the requirements of the Companies Act of South Africa.
We conducted our audit in accordance with International Standards on Auditing (ISAs). Our responsibilities under those standards are further described in the Auditors' responsibilities for the audit of the consolidated and separate financial statements section of our report. We are independent of the Group and Company in accordance with the sections 290 and 291 of the Independent Regulatory Board for Auditors' Code of Professional Conduct for Registered Auditors (Revised January 2018), parts 1 and 3 of the Independent Regulatory Board for Auditors' Code of Professional Conduct for Registered Auditors (Revised November 2018) (together the IRBA Codes) and other independence requirements applicable to performing audits of financial statements in South Africa. We have fulfilled our other ethical responsibilities, as applicable, in accordance with the IRBA Codes and in accordance with other ethical requirements applicable to performing audits in South Africa. The IRBA Codes are consistent with the corresponding sections of the International Ethics Standards Board for Accountants' Code of Ethics for Professional Accountants and the International Ethics Standards Board for Accountants' International Code of Ethics for Professional Accountants (including International Independence Standards) respectively. We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our opinion.
Key audit matters are those matters that, in our professional judgement, were of most significance in our audit of the consolidated and separate financial statements of the current period. These matters were addressed in the context of our audit of the consolidated and separate financial statements as a whole, and in forming our opinion thereon, and we do not provide a separate opinion on these matters.
| Level | Key audit matter | How our audit addressed the key audit matter | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Group – consolidated financial statements |
Expected credit losses on Corporate & Investment Banking (CIB) loans and advances Refer to the key management assumptions note, note 7 – Loans and advances, note 34 – Credit impairment charges and the credit risk section of Annexure C: Risk and capital management – IFRS disclosures in the annual financial statements. |
||
| The expected credit losses ("ECL") for CIB loans and advances ("exposures") are material to the consolidated financial statements in terms of their magnitude, the level of subjective judgement applied by management and the effect that the ECL has on the Group's credit risk management processes and operations. This has resulted in this matter being considered to be a matter of most significance in the audit of the consolidated financial statements. The ECL of CIB exposures are estimated on a counterparty basis. For CIB exposures, the key areas of significant management judgement within the ECL calculations include: • Evaluation of significant increase in credit risk ("SICR"); • Incorporation of macro-economic inputs and forward-looking information into the SICR assessment and ECL measurement; • Assessment of ECL raised for Stage 3 exposures; and • Input assumptions applied to estimate the probability of default ("PD"), exposure at default ("EAD") and loss given default ("LGD") within the ECL measurement. |
Our audit effort focussed on the ECL of CIB exposures as follows: Evaluation of SICR We selected a sample of counterparties and assessed their assigned credit rating by: • Testing the inputs into the credit rating systems against the financial information obtained from the counterparty and the Group's 25-point master rating scale; and • Assessing assumptions made by management during the credit risk rating process for reasonability, by obtaining an understanding of the counterparty and industry factors, performing an independent assessment of the counterparty and comparing the results to those used by management. We selected a sample of Stage 1 and Stage 2 exposures and assessed whether the stage classification of these exposures was appropriate in terms of the Group's accounting policy for SICR at reporting date since the origination date of these exposures. These procedures included the inspection of credit risk ratings at reporting date relative to origination date. We evaluated management's processes for identifying Stage 3 exposures by selecting a sample of exposures not classified at Stage 3 to assess whether the stage classification was in line with the Group's accounting policy for the definition of default for Stage 3 exposures. |
| Level | Key audit matter | How our audit addressed the key audit matter |
|---|---|---|
| Group – consolidated financial statements |
Expected credit losses on Corporate & Investment Banking (CIB) loans and advances charges annual financial statements. |
Refer to the key management assumptions note, note 7 – Loans and advances, note 34 – Credit impairment and the credit risk section of Annexure C: Risk and capital management – IFRS disclosures in the |
| Evaluation of SICR For CIB exposures, SICR is largely driven through the movement in credit ratings assigned to counterparties on origination and reporting date, based on the Group's 25-point master rating scale to quantify credit risk for each exposure. Incorporation of macro-economic inputs and forward-looking information into the SICR assessment and ECL measurement Macro-economic expectations are incorporated in CIB's counterparty ratings to reflect the Group expectation of future economic and business conditions. Assessment of ECL raised for Stage 3 exposures Management applies its internal credit risk management approach and definitions to determine the recoverable amounts (including collateral) and timing of the future cash flows for Stage 3 exposures at an individual counterparty level. Input assumptions applied to estimate the PD, EAD and LGD within the ECL measurement. Input assumptions applied to estimate the PD, EAD and LGD as inputs into the ECL measurement are subject to management judgement and is determined at an exposure level. |
We selected a sample of Stage 1 and Stage 2 counterparties and performed the following procedures to determine if the counterparties credit risk increased since origination date: • Compared the credit rating on inception of the facility to the credit rating as at the reporting date; • For any significant downgrades in credit rating as per the policy assessed whether the counterparty is correctly classified as Stage 2 for impairment purposes; and • For any deviations from the Group's credit policy, assessed the reasonability for these deviations. Incorporation of macro-economic inputs and forward looking information into the SICR assessment and ECL measurement We selected a sample of exposures and assessed the incorporation of forward-looking information into their assigned credit risk rating. We have done this by obtaining an understanding of the forward-looking information which was taken into account for the exposure and evaluated this for reasonability against management's expectation and other industry factors for the SICR assessment and ECL measurement. Assessment of ECL raised for Stage 3 exposures Where an ECL has been raised for Stage 3 exposures, we considered the impairment indicators, uncertainties and assumptions applied by management in their assessment of the recoverability of the exposure. For a sample of Stage 3 exposures, we independently recalculated the ECL based on our assessment of the expected cash flows and recoverability of collateral at an individual exposure level. For collateral held, we inspected legal agreements and other relevant documentation to confirm the existence and legal right to the collateral. The collateral valuation techniques applied by management were assessed against the Group's valuation guidelines. Input assumptions applied to estimate the PD, EAD and LGD within the ECL measurement Making use of our internal valuation experts, we assessed the input assumptions applied within the PD, EAD and LGD models (including forward looking information) against the requirements of IFRS 9 (IFRS 9). Financial Instruments In addition, our procedures included assessing the appropriateness of the models through reperformance and validation procedures. We obtained an understanding and tested the relevant controls relating to the approval of credit facilities, subsequent monitoring and remediation of exposures, key system reconciliations and collateral management. As a result of the deterioration of the South African sovereign outlook, we assessed, for a sample of exposures relating to public sector entities whether the ECL raised on these exposures are appropriate through the inspection of legal agreements, including any related government guarantees to confirm the existence and legal right to collateral. We assessed the adequacy of the disclosures in the financial statements in accordance with IFRS 9. |
| Level | Key audit matter | How our audit addressed the key audit matter |
|---|---|---|
| Group – consolidated financial statements |
ECL on Personal & Business Banking (PBB) loans and advances financial statements. |
Refer to the Key management assumptions note, note 7 – Loans and advances, note 34 – Credit impairment charges and the credit risk section of Annexure C, Risk and capital management – IFRS disclosures in the annual |
| The ECL for PBB loans and advances (exposures) is material to the consolidated financial statements in terms of their magnitude, the level of subjective judgement applied by management and the effect that the ECL has on the impairment of loans and advances and on the Group's credit risk management processes and operations. This has resulted in this matter being considered to be a matter of most significance in the audit of the consolidated financial statements. A significant portion of the PBB ECL is calculated on a portfolio basis. For exposures quantitatively above a pre-defined threshold in secured portfolios, management assesses the recoverability of those exposures individually. The ECL on exposures also includes out-of-model adjustments where certain aspects of the ECL are not fully reflected in the model. Out-of-model adjustments are calculated and assessed based on management's judgement. For PBB, the key areas of significant management judgement within the ECL calculation include: • Evaluation of SICR; • Incorporation of macro-economic inputs and forward-looking information into the SICR assessment and ECL measurement; • Application of out-of-model adjustments into the ECL measurement; • Assessment of the ECL raised for individual exposures; and • Input assumptions applied to estimate the PD, EAD and LGD within the ECL measurement. Evaluation of SICR The Group determines the SICR threshold by utilising an appropriate transfer rate of exposures that are less than 30 days past due (DPD) to Stage 2. This transfer rate is such that the proportion of the 0 – 29 DPD book transferred into Stage 2 is no less than the observed 12-month roll rate of 0 – 29 day accounts into 30 or more days in arrears. The SICR thresholds are reviewed regularly to ensure that they are appropriately calibrated to identify SICR by portfolio vintage and to consequently facilitate appropriate impairment coverage. Incorporation of macro-economic inputs and |
Our audit effort focussed on the ECL for PBB exposures as follows: Evaluation of SICR Management provided us with a quantitative assessment of the Group's calculation of the impact of SICR against the requirements of IFRS 9. We performed an independent recalculation of the resultant ECL for a sample of portfolios. We evaluated behavioural scores which are used to assess the significant increase in credit risk against the Group's accounting policies. We evaluated the reasonability of changes in credit risk of the portfolio against key performance indicators. We performed sensitivity analyses to determine the impact of change in credit risk on the ECL recognised. We tested the design and operating effectiveness of relevant controls that identify renegotiated and cured loans to assess whether the curing policies were appropriately applied. Incorporation of macro-economic inputs and forward looking information into the SICR assessment and ECL measurement We evaluated the appropriateness of forward-looking economic expectations included in the ECL by comparing to independent industry data. We evaluated management's forward-looking information models to assess whether the macro-economic inputs are appropriately incorporated into the ECL models. Where management applied out-of-model adjustments to the forward-looking information, we evaluated these for reasonableness and evaluated the methodology applied to incorporate these into the forecasts. Application of out-of-model adjustments into the ECL measurement We evaluated the reasonableness of a selection of out-of model adjustments by assessing key assumptions, inspecting the calculation methodology and tracing a sample of out-of-model adjustments back to source data. |
|
| forward-looking information into the SICR assessment and ECL measurement. Forward-looking economic expectations are included in the ECL based on the Group's macro-economic outlook, using models that correlate these parameters with macro-economic variables. Where modelled correlations are not viable or predictive, adjustments are based on judgement to predict the outcomes based on the |
Group's macro-economic outlook expectations.
| Level | Key audit matter | How our audit addressed the key audit matter |
|---|---|---|
| Group – consolidated financial statements |
ECL on Personal & Business Banking (PBB) loans and advances financial statements. |
Refer to the Key management assumptions note, note 7 – Loans and advances, note 34 – Credit impairment charges and the credit risk section of Annexure C, Risk and capital management – IFRS disclosures in the annual |
| continued | Application of out-of-model adjustments into the ECL measurement Management identified that due to modelling complexity, certain aspects of the ECL may not be fully reflected by the underlying model and an out-of-model adjustment is required for the forward-looking information impact for specific events and trends not captured in the model. |
Assessment of ECL raised for individual exposures Where ECL has been raised for individual exposures, we considered the impairment indicators, uncertainties and assumptions made by management in their assessment of the recoverability of the exposure. For a sample of Stage 3 exposures, we independently recalculated the impairment losses based on our assessment of the expected cash flows and recoverability of collateral at an individual exposure level. |
| Assessment of ECL raised for individual exposures Impairment is assessed on individual exposures above a quantitative threshold in Stage 3, and for accounts placed on the watchlist due to evidence of increased credit risk e.g. potential security shortfalls, deteriorating financial performance, etc. This assessment relates primarily to business lending accounts and incorporates judgement in determining the foreclosure value of the underlying collateral. Input assumptions applied to estimate the PD, EAD and LGD within the ECL measurement The ECL is calculated using statistical models which incorporate observable data, assumptions and estimates relating to historical default experience and the loss experience given default; and timing and amount of forecasted cash flows related to the exposures. |
For collateral held, we inspected legal agreements and other relevant documentation to confirm the existence and legal right to the collateral. The collateral valuation techniques applied by management were assessed against the Group's valuation guidelines. Input assumptions applied to estimate the PD, EAD and LGD within the ECL measurement Making use of our internal valuation experts, we assessed the assumptions relating to historical default experience, estimated timing and amount of forecasted cash flows and the value of collateral applied within the PD, EAD and LGD models for compliance with the requirements of IFRS 9. In addition, our procedures included assessing the appropriateness of the statistical models by reperformance and validation procedures. We assessed the adequacy of the disclosures in the financial statements in accordance with IFRS 9. |
|
| Group – consolidated financial statements |
Valuation of level 3 financial instruments note 5 and capital management – IFRS disclosures in the consolidated financial statements |
Refer to the Key management assumptions note, note 2 – Derivative instruments, note 3 – Trading assets, – Financial investments, note 17 – Trading liabilities, and the market risk section of Annexure C: Risk |
| The fair value of financial instruments significantly affects the measurement of profit or loss and disclosures of financial risks in the consolidated financial statements. Fair value calculations are dependent on various sources of external and internal data and on sophisticated modelling techniques used to value financial instruments. These models and techniques are constantly changing in line with developing market practices and trends. Level 3 financial instruments inherently contain elements of estimation uncertainty due to their illiquid and unobservable nature. These financial instruments include unlisted equity investments, loans and advances and various derivative financial instruments. Significant judgement is required to be exercised by management due to the absence of verifiable third-party information to determine key inputs in the valuation models. Some of these unobservable key inputs include: • credit spreads; and • discount rates denominated in illiquid foreign currencies. Given the combination of inherent subjectivity and judgement involved in estimating these fair values and the material nature of the balance, the valuation of level 3 financial instruments has been considered to be a matter of most significance to the current year audit of the consolidated financial statements. |
Our audit effort focussed on the valuation of level 3 financial instruments as follows: We tested the design and operating effectiveness of the relevant controls relating to the valuation of level 3 financial instruments to assess whether there is appropriate governance over the development of the valuation models and change control as well as the monthly independent price verification process. For a sample of financial instruments, using an independent model, we compared the fair value results to management's valuation to assess the reasonableness of management's model methodology and the output of model calculations. We assessed the appropriateness and sensitivity of unobservable market rates, projected cash flows and valuation adjustments with reference to the best available independent market information. We assessed the appropriateness and sensitivity of the credit spreads by evaluating the unobservable market rates, projected cash flows and valuation adjustments with reference to the best available independent market information. Where independent market information was not available, we generated theoretical inputs based on other sources, incorporating assumptions that include proxy pricing transactions in the market as well as historic data, macro economic information and correlations. |
| Level | Key audit matter | How our audit addressed the key audit matter |
|---|---|---|
| Group – consolidated financial |
Valuation of long-term policyholders' assets and liabilities under insurance contracts Refer to the Key management assumptions note and note 8 – Policyholders' contracts in the notes to the annual financial statements. |
|
| statements | As at 31 December 2019, the carrying amounts of the policyholders' assets and liabilities under insurance contracts were R7 billion and R206 billion respectively, which is measured in accordance with the Standard of Actuarial Practice 104 (SAP 104). Policyholders' assets and liabilities under insurance contracts include provisions for the net present value of expected future benefits and expected future costs, less expected future premiums and for claims incurred but not reported (IBNR). Complex and subjective judgements are required over a variety of uncertain future operating assumptions within the life insurance business. These assumptions include, amongst others, mortality and morbidity rates, withdrawals, investment return and discount rates, recurring expenses, taxation, and expense inflation. The assumptions applied by management, as disclosed in Note 8 to the consolidated financial statements, in determining the value of the policyholders' assets and liabilities and any changes to these assumptions, may result in a material adjustment to the value of policyholders' assets and liabilities and ultimately the results of the Group. We considered the valuation of the policyholders' assets and liabilities a matter of most significance to our current year audit due to: • the significant management judgement required in determining the value of the policyholders' assets and liabilities; and • the magnitude of the policyholders' assets and liabilities in relation to the total assets and liabilities of the Group. |
Our audit effort focussed on the valuation of the policyholders' assets and liabilities, which included making use of our actuarial expertise as follows: • Updated our understanding of the actuarial control environment and governance, including the functioning of the Actuarial Committee, which approves the methodology and assumption changes against industry practice and regulatory requirements; • We attended management meetings where valuation principles were discussed and approved. We performed tests and reasonability checks to corroborate that these principles as approved were applied in the valuation model; • Compared the changes in valuation methodology against the requirements of SAP 104 and industry practice; • Compared the assumptions applied by management against the latest experience, industry trends and economic market trends; and • Examined and corroborated management's Analysis of Surplus by analysing the sources of profit and how it relates to the change in the policyholders' assets and liabilities and the impact on the statement of comprehensive income. To test the inputs used in the valuation models we performed, on a sample basis, the following: • Assessed the reasonability of the classification of expenses between maintenance and acquisition and how they are capitalised in the valuation by considering the nature of the expenses and inspecting the source document relating to the expense; and • Traced the policyholders' valuation input data, such as premiums, claims and expense data used in the valuation model back to information contained in the administration and accounting systems. |
| Level | Key audit matter | How our audit addressed the key audit matter |
|---|---|---|
| Group – consolidated financial statements |
Valuation of investment property at year-end financial statements |
Refer to the Key management assumptions note and note 11 – Investment property in the notes to the annual |
| The majority of the Group's investment property comprises retail investment properties. As at 31 December 2019, the carrying value of the Group's total investment property portfolio was R34 billion, representing a R0.9 billion increase compared to the prior year. The Group's accounting policy is to measure investment property at fair value using the discounted cash flow model. The fair value is dependent on the inputs and assumptions into valuation techniques applied and the inputs into the valuation model. The inputs made by management in determining the fair value of the investment property are set out in the key management assumptions section of the consolidated financial statements and include amongst others the key assumptions relating to exit capitalisation rates and discount rates. The accounting policy requires all properties to be valued annually. Management engage external independent valuers (the external valuers) to carry out a valuation of all investment properties. We considered the year-end valuation of investment properties as a matter of most significance to our current year audit due to: • the significant judgements required in determining the exit capitalisation rates and discount rates; and • the magnitude of the investment properties at year-end. |
We obtained the latest independent property market reports to understand the prevailing market conditions in which the Group invests, and our audit effort focused on the following: • We updated our understanding of and tested the relevant controls related to: – Entering and amending of leases in support of contractual rental income; – Setting and approval of budgets by the Group; – Detailed analysis of forecasts and trends against actual results that inform management of the business; – Consideration of external valuation reports by an internally appointed appraiser; and – Board approval of the valuations obtained. In respect of the external valuers we: • Considered their objectivity, independence and expertise by inspecting the external valuers' valuation reports for a statement of independence and compliance with generally accepted valuation standards; and • Confirmed the external valuers' affiliation with the relevant professional body; On a risk-based sample basis, we assessed the calculation of the fair values in the external valuers' valuation reports by performing the following procedures: • Utilised our internal valuation expertise to assess the appropriateness of the valuation methodology; • Considered the applicability of minority discounts to fractional ownership; • Assessed the reasonableness of the cash flows, growth, exit capitalisation and discount rates against market related data for similar investment properties; • Recalculated acceptable ranges for the valuations of a sample of properties based on industry benchmarks; and • Inspected the final valuation reports and agreed the fair value to the Group's accounting records. |
| Group – Impairment of the Investment in ICBC Standard Bank Plc (ICBCS) consolidated Refer to Annexure B – Associates and joint ventures, Annexure F – Detailed accounting policies and Key financial management assumptions statements Standard Bank Group (SBG) holds a 40% investment in ICBCS through Standard Bank London Holdings (SBLH). ICBCS has incurred significant losses over the past year, comprising mainly of impairment losses, operational losses and restructuring costs arising from losses and provisions relating to a single client loss, as well as a revised business strategy. The Group considered this to be an |
Our audit effort focussed on management's impairment assessment and value-in-use calculation in respect of the investment in ICBCS and included: • An evaluation of management's assessment in considering the circumstances giving rise to the indicator of an impairment. We assessed this information against our knowledge of the underlying business; • Assessed the methodology applied by management to estimate the value-in-use. We assessed the key |
|---|---|
| indicator of impairment resulting in an impairment loss of R2.4bn (US\$163m) recognised during the year. As a result, the carrying value of the investment at year end has been reduced to R2.6bn (US\$189m). The impairment loss recognised in respect of the associate interest in ICBCS was considered to be a matter of most significance in the current year audit due to the inherent high degree of judgement and uncertainty involved in determining the recoverable amount of the investment in ICBCS for the purposes of preparing the consolidated financial statements of SBG. Management applied the assumptions as set out in the key management assumptions section of the consolidated financial statements to determine if there was an indicator of impairment and to calculate the recoverable amount of the investment at 30 September and 31 December 2019. These are as follows: • The Group applied a value-in-use approach to determine the recoverable amount of ICBCS utilising the latest available information at year end. • Cash flow projections were based on future cash flows the Group expects to derive from the investment taking into consideration the weighted average of various scenarios. These include key inputs based on ICBCS' most recent business plan. • A discount rate of 9.8% reflecting current market assessment of the time value of money and related risks. For purposes of preparing the consolidated financial statements, the impairment loss was determined in accordance with the detailed accounting policies as set out in Annexure F, |
assumptions supporting the value-in-use calculation, evaluating the accuracy and relevance of the input data to support the calculation, including approved budgets and considering the reasonableness of the budgets by comparing the budgets to historical results and market data as well as our knowledge of the business; • Engaged our internal valuation experts to assist in reviewing the methodology of the value-in-use calculations and discount rate applied; • Independently recalculated the value-in-use of the investment in ICBCS and performed appropriate sensitivity analyses in consideration of the potential impact of reasonably possible downside changes in key assumptions, such as the cost of equity and the future business plans surrounding the ongoing operations of ICBCS; and • We assessed the appropriateness of the disclosures made in accordance with the requirements of International Accounting Standards (IAS) 28 Investments in associates and IAS 36 and joint ventures Impairment of assets. |
| Level | Key audit matter | How our audit addressed the key audit matter | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Group – consolidated financial statements |
Hyperinflationary considerations relating to Stanbic Bank Zimbabwe Limited Refer to Annexure A – Subsidiaries, consolidated and unconsolidated structured entities and Annexure F – Detailed accounting policies |
|||
| Zimbabwe has experienced cumulative price increases which have accelerated to 521% as at 31 December 2019. As a result, management evaluated and determined the economy of Zimbabwe to be hyperinflationary. Stanbic Bank Zimbabwe applied the requirements of IAS 29 Financial reporting in Hyperinflationary (IAS 29). Economies These hyperinflationary adjustments were determined to be a matter of most significance in the current year audit due to the magnitude of the balances, transactions, and the complexity and subjectivity relating to the application of IAS 29. This resulted in the Group's profit attributable to ordinary shareholders for the year ended 31 December 2019 decreasing by R82 million and an increase in retained earnings of R730 million. |
Our audit effort in respect of the hyperinflationary considerations relating to Stanbic Bank Zimbabwe focussed on: • We obtained an understanding of the Group's process for identifying hyperinflationary economies and evaluated the Group's accounting policy in relation to hyperinflation; • We assessed whether the indicators of hyperinflation on the Zimbabwean economy have been met through consideration of industry reports and pronouncements issued by the Public Accountants and Auditors Board (PAAB) in Zimbabwe; • We tested the accuracy of the hyperinflation computations prepared by management with reference to the economic indicators included (such as the inflation rate, cumulative inflation rate and consumer price indices from various sources); • We assessed the reasonability of the assumptions used by comparing these to externally available industry, financial and economic data; and • We assessed whether disclosures in the financial statements appropriately reflected the effects of the application of IAS 29. |
|||
| Company – separate financial statements |
Impairment of interest in subsidiaries Refer to Annexure A – Subsidiaries, consolidated and unconsolidated structured entities, Annexure F – Detailed accounting policies, Key management assumptions and note 46 – interest in subsidiaries in the notes to the annual financial statements. |
|||
| The Company has material interests in subsidiaries. Interest in subsidiaries represents 83% of the total assets of the Company. Interests in subsidiaries are measured at cost and are reviewed annually for impairment with reference to impairment indicators described in Note 46 to the separate financial statements. The impairment of interest in subsidiaries was considered to be a matter of most significance to the current year audit due to the judgement applied in assessing the impairment indicators and the magnitude of the Company's interest in subsidiaries. |
Our audit effort in respect of impairment of interest in subsidiaries focussed on: • Evaluated management's policies for identifying impairment indicators relating to the Company's interest in subsidiaries against the requirements of IAS 36, ; and Impairment of Assets • Performed an independent impairment assessment by comparing the recoverable amount of the investment in subsidiary to the carrying value to determine if there is an impairment loss that needs to be recognised. |
The directors are responsible for the other information. The other information comprises the information included in the document titled "Standard Bank Group Annual financial statements 2019" which includes the Group secretary's certification, the Report of the group audit committee and the Directors' report as required by the Companies Act of South Africa, which we obtained prior to the date of this report, and the document titled, "Standard Bank Group Annual integrated report 2019" which is expected to be made available to us after that date. The other information does not include the consolidated or the separate financial statements and our auditors' report thereon.
Our opinion on the consolidated and separate financial statements does not cover the other information and we do not and will not express an audit opinion or any form of assurance conclusion thereon.
In connection with our audit of the consolidated and separate financial statements, our responsibility is to read the other information identified above and, in doing so, consider whether the other information is materially inconsistent with the consolidated and separate financial statements or our knowledge obtained in the audit, or otherwise appears to be materially misstated.
If, based on the work we have performed on the other information that we obtained prior to the date of this auditors' report, we conclude that there is a material misstatement of this other information, we are required to report that fact. We have nothing to report in this regard.
The directors are responsible for the preparation and fair presentation of the consolidated and separate financial statements in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards and the requirements of the Companies Act of South Africa, and for such internal control as the directors determine is necessary to enable the preparation of consolidated and separate financial statements that are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error.
In preparing the consolidated and separate financial statements, the directors are responsible for assessing the Group and the Company's ability to continue as a going concern, disclosing, as applicable, matters related to going concern and using the going concern basis of accounting unless the directors either intend to liquidate the Group and/or the Company or to cease operations, or have no realistic alternative but to do so.
Our objectives are to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated and separate financial statements as a whole are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error, and to issue an auditors' report that includes our opinion. Reasonable assurance is a high level of assurance, but is not a guarantee that an audit conducted in accordance with ISAs will always detect a material misstatement when it exists. Misstatements can arise from fraud or error and are considered material if, individually or in the aggregate, they could reasonably be expected to influence the economic decisions of users taken on the basis of these consolidated and separate financial statements.
As part of an audit in accordance with ISAs, we exercise professional judgement and maintain professional scepticism throughout the audit. We also:
exists, we are required to draw attention in our auditors' report to the related disclosures in the consolidated and separate financial statements or, if such disclosures are inadequate, to modify our opinion. Our conclusions are based on the audit evidence obtained up to the date of our auditors' report. However, future events or conditions may cause the Group and/or Company to cease to continue as a going concern.
We communicate with the directors regarding, among other matters, the planned scope and timing of the audit and significant audit findings, including any significant deficiencies in internal control that we identify during our audit.
We also provide the directors with a statement that we have complied with relevant ethical requirements regarding independence, and to communicate with them all relationships and other matters that may reasonably be thought to bear on our independence, and where applicable, related safeguards.
From the matters communicated with the directors, we determine those matters that were of most significance in the audit of the consolidated and separate financial statements of the current period and are therefore the key audit matters. We describe these matters in our auditors' report unless law or regulation precludes public disclosure about the matter or when, in extremely rare circumstances, we determine that a matter should not be communicated in our report because the adverse consequences of doing so would reasonably be expected to outweigh the public interest benefits of such communication.
In terms of the IRBA Rule published in Government Gazette Number 39475 dated 4 December 2015, we report that KPMG Inc. and PricewaterhouseCoopers Inc. have been the joint auditors of Standard Bank Group Limited for 57 years.
PricewaterhouseCoopers Inc. KPMG Inc.
Registered Auditor Registered Auditor Johannesburg Johannesburg 4 March 2020 4 March 2020
Director: John Bennett Director: Heather Berrange
as at 31 December 2019
| GROUP | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Note | 2019 Rm |
2018 Restated Rm |
1 January 2018 Restated Rm |
|
| Assets | ||||
| Cash and balances with central banks | 1 | 75 288 | 85 145 | 75 310 |
| Derivative assets | 2 | 71 407 | 51 678 | 75 610 |
| Trading assets | 3 | 222 802 | 181 112 | 160 894 |
| Pledged assets | 4 | 29 377 | 19 879 | 20 785 |
| Financial investments1 | 5 | 567 319 | 548 526 | 534 624 |
| Current tax assets | 567 | 601 | 612 | |
| Disposal group assets held for sale | 6 | 2 599 | 762 | |
| Loans and advances1 | 7 | 1 181 067 | 1 119 547 | 1 038 555 |
| Policyholders' assets | 8 | 7 017 | 6 708 | 7 484 |
| Other assets | 9 | 29 901 | 22 514 | 22 923 |
| Investment in associates and joint ventures | 10 | 5 423 | 10 376 | 9 609 |
| Investment property | 11 | 34 180 | 33 326 | 32 226 |
| Property, equipment and right of use assets2 | 12 | 22 018 | 19 194 | 16 179 |
| Goodwill and other intangible assets | 13 | 22 323 | 23 676 | 23 329 |
| Deferred tax assets | 14 | 4 301 | 3 918 | 3 898 |
| Total assets | 2 275 589 | 2 126 962 | 2 022 038 | |
| Equity and liabilities | ||||
| Equity | 209 484 | 199 063 | 183 380 | |
| Equity attributable to ordinary shareholders | 171 229 | 165 061 | 150 759 | |
| Ordinary share capital | 15 | 162 | 162 | 162 |
| Ordinary share premium | 15 | 17 822 | 17 698 | 17 901 |
| Reserves | 153 245 | 147 201 | 132 696 | |
| Equity attributable to other equity instrument holders | 15 | 10 989 | 9 047 | 9 047 |
| Preference share capital and premium | 15 | 5 503 | 5 503 | 5 503 |
| Additional tier 1 capital | 15 | 5 486 | 3 544 | 3 544 |
| Equity attributable to non-controlling interests | 27 266 | 24 955 | 23 574 | |
| Liabilities | 2 066 105 | 1 927 899 | 1 838 658 | |
| Derivative liabilities | 2 | 69 498 | 55 057 | 76 896 |
| Trading liabilities | 17 | 83 847 | 59 947 | 62 855 |
| Current tax liabilities | 5 407 | 5 188 | 5 107 | |
| Disposal group liabilities held for sale | 6 | 246 | 237 | |
| Deposits and debt funding | 18 | 1 426 193 | 1 357 537 | 1 243 911 |
| Policyholders' liabilities | 8 | 324 246 | 310 994 | 322 918 |
| Subordinated debt | 19 | 28 901 | 26 359 | 24 289 |
| Provisions and other liabilities2 | 109 753 | 99 175 | ||
| Deferred tax liabilities | ||||
| 20 14 |
124 101 3 666 |
2 827 | 3 507 |
1 Refer to page 31 for details on the restatement to financial investments and loans and advances.
2 The group has, as permitted by IFRS 16 Leases (IFRS 16), elected not to restate its comparative annual financial statements. Comparability will therefore not be achieved as the comparative annual financial information has been prepared on an IAS 17 Leases (IAS 17) basis. Refer to page 29 for more detail on the adoption of IFRS 16.
for the year ended 31 December 2019
| Note | GROUP | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 Rm |
2018 Restated Rm |
|||
| Income from banking activities | 110 461 | 105 331 | ||
| Net interest income | 62 919 | 59 505 | ||
| Interest income1 Interest expense1, 2 |
26 26 |
129 500 (66 581) |
128 066 (68 561) |
|
| Non-interest revenue | 47 542 | 45 826 | ||
| Net fee and commission revenue | 30 622 | 30 375 | ||
| Fee and commission revenue Fee and commission expense |
27 27 |
37 354 (6 732) |
36 592 (6 217) |
|
| Trading revenue1 Other revenue1 Other gains and losses on financial instruments1 |
28 29 30 |
12 075 4 089 756 |
10 799 3 863 789 |
|
| Income from investment management and life insurance activities | 23 573 | 21 722 | ||
| Insurance premiums received Revenue from contracts with customers Interest income Insurance benefits and claims paid Investment management and service fee income and gains Fair value adjustments to investment management liabilities and third-party fund interests |
31 32 32 31 32 33 |
39 801 4 076 1 920 (44 241) 3 245 18 772 |
38 521 4 073 1 516 (26 484) 3 533 563 |
|
| Total income Credit impairment charges |
34 | 134 034 (7 964) |
127 053 (6 489) |
|
| Net income before operating expenses Operating expenses in banking activities2 Operating expenses in investment management and life insurance activities2 |
35 35 |
126 070 (62 335) (16 486) |
120 564 (60 084) (16 404) |
|
| Net income before capital items and equity accounted earnings Non-trading and capital related items Share of post tax (loss)/profit from associates |
36 10 |
47 249 (2 890) (512) |
44 076 (641) 912 |
|
| Net income before indirect taxation Indirect taxation |
37 | 43 847 (2 592) |
44 347 (2 609) |
|
| Profit before direct taxation Direct taxation |
37 | 41 255 (10 559) |
41 738 (9 095) |
|
| Profit for the year | 30 696 | 32 643 | ||
| Attributable to ordinary shareholders Attributable to other equity instrument holders Attributable to non-controlling interests |
25 443 873 4 380 |
27 453 738 4 452 |
||
| Earnings per share Basic earnings per ordinary share (cents) Diluted earnings per ordinary share (cents) |
38 38 |
1 593.5 1 584.7 |
1 722.6 1 705.3 |
1 Restated. Refer to page 31 for further details on the restatements.
2 The group has, as permitted by IFRS 16, elected not to restate its comparative annual financial statements. Comparability will therefore not be achieved as the comparative annual financial information has been prepared on an IAS 17 basis. Refer to page 29 for more detail on the adoption of IFRS 16.
for the year ended 31 December 2019
| GROUP | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Note | 2019 Rm |
2018 Rm |
|
| Profit for the year Other comprehensive (loss)/income after taxation for the period1 |
30 696 (6 208) |
32 643 5 056 |
|
| Items that may be subsequently reclassified to profit or loss | (6 355) | 5 104 | |
| Exchange differences on translating foreign operations2 Movement in the cash flow hedging reserve |
2 | (6 661) 205 |
5 217 (108) |
| Net change in fair value of cash flow hedges Realised fair value adjustments transferred to profit or loss |
415 (210) |
(373) 265 |
|
| Net change in debt financial assets measured at fair value through other comprehensive income (FVOCI) |
22 | 101 | (5) |
| Net change in expected credit loss Net change in fair value Realised fair value adjustments transferred to profit or loss |
41 74 (14) |
19 22 (46) |
|
| Items that may not be subsequently reclassified to profit or loss | 147 | (48) | |
| Defined benefit fund remeasurement Change in own credit risk recognised on financial liabilities designated at fair value through profit or loss (FVTPL) Net change in fair value of equity financial assets measured at FVOCI Other gains |
22 | 101 (8) 45 9 |
12 55 (130) 15 |
| Total comprehensive income for the period | 24 488 | 37 699 | |
| Attributable to ordinary shareholders Attributable to other equity instrument holders Attributable to non-controlling interests |
20 000 873 3 615 |
31 877 738 5 084 |
1 Income tax relating to each component of other comprehensive income is disclosed in note 37.
2 For the year ended 31 December 2019, the most significant contributor of this change relates to the deterioration of the Zimbabwean functional currency, refer to annexure A for more detail.
for the year ended 31 December 2019
| Note | GROUP | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 Rm |
2018 Restated Rm |
||
| Net cash flows from operating activities | 23 346 | 34 647 | |
| Net income before capital items and equity accounted earnings | 47 249 | 44 076 | |
| Adjusted for non-cash items and other adjustments included in the income statement1 | 41 | (63 506) | (70 492) |
| Increase in income-earning assets | 41 | (169 094) | (85 337) |
| Increase in deposits, trading and other liabilities | 41 | 140 660 | 78 802 |
| Dividends received | 3 830 | 3 866 | |
| Interest paid | (67 153) | (69 021) | |
| Interest received1 | 130 275 | 128 403 | |
| Direct taxation paid | (9 907) | (10 256) | |
| Purchase of properties | (175) | (742) | |
| Proceeds on sales of properties | 0 | 45 | |
| Proceeds on financial instruments | 10 612 | 13 293 | |
| Proceeds on realisation of fair value gain | 468 | 912 | |
| Proceeds on collateral deposits payable | 88 | 1 098 | |
| Net cash flows used in investing activities | (5 105) | (8 728) | |
| Capital expenditure on property and equipment | (7 424) | (6 159) | |
| Proceeds from sale of property and equipment | 3 378 | 777 | |
| Capital expenditure on intangible assets | (1 489) | (3 267) | |
| Disposal of interest to non-controlling interests in Liberty Life Swaziland | 15 | ||
| Acquisition of non-controlling interests in Liberty Holdings Namibia | (8) | ||
| Sale/(acquisitions) of associates and joint ventures2 | 486 | (79) | |
| Net cash flows used in investing activities in disposal group | (63) | ||
| Net cash flows used in financing activities | (15 639) | (18 335) | |
| Issuance/(buy-back) of ordinary share capital | 124 | (203) | |
| Issuance of other equity instruments | 1 942 | ||
| Equity transactions with non-controlling interests3 | 391 | (1 843) | |
| Cash flows from black economic empowerment transactions | (132) | (138) | |
| Issuance of subordinated debt | 41 | 7 269 | 6 100 |
| Redemption of subordinated debt | 41 | (4 850) | (4 550) |
| Principal lease repayments4 | 20 | (1 734) | |
| Dividends paid5 | (18 649) | (17 701) | |
| Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents | (12 459) | 2 251 | |
| Net (decrease)/increase in cash and cash equivalents | (9 857) | 9 835 | |
| Cash and cash equivalents at the beginning of the year | 85 145 | 75 310 | |
| Cash and cash equivalents at the end of the year | 75 288 | 85 145 |
1 Restated. Refer to page 31 for further details on the restatement.
2 The cash outflows from associates and joint ventures amounted to R255 million and cash inflows amounted to R741 million.
3 Refer to annexure A for more detail on material transactions with non-controlling interests.
4 The group has, as permitted by IFRS 16, elected not to restate its comparative annual financial statements. Comparability will therefore not be achieved as the comparative annual financial information has been prepared on an IAS 17 basis. Refer to page 29 for more detail on the adoption of IFRS 16. 5 During 2019, coupons to the value of R636 million (2018: R447 million) was paid to additional tier 1 (AT1) capital bond holders. Current tax of R178 million
(2018: R125 million) relating to the AT1 capital bonds was recognised directly in equity resulting in an aggregate net equity impact of R458 million (2018: R322 million).
for the year ended 31 December 2019
1 The FVOCI reserve comprises of the FVOCI reserve for debt and equity financial investment. Refer to note 22 for more detail.
2 Other equity instrument holders are holders of preference share capital and AT1 capital. The dividend paid comprises of net equity impact of R458 million (2018: R322 million) on AT1 and preference dividend of R636 million (2018: R416 million). Refer to note 15 for more detail.
3 Refer to the accounting policy elections, transition and restatements on page 29 for more detail on the IFRS 16 transition.
4 Where the group owns a majority stake in certain property partnerships and controls the management of those properties, including the power over all significant decisions around the use and maintenance of those properties, they are classified as businesses and the group consolidates its interest in those property partnerships.
5 Includes hedges of the group's equity-settled share incentive schemes.
6 Refer to annexure A for more detail on material transactions with non-controlling interests.
7 Comprises of the hyperinflation adjustments from Zimbabwe (R730 million) and South Sudan (R17 million).
All balances are stated net of tax, where applicable.
AFS Refer to annexure F for the accounting policies relating to the reserves information.
| Total equity Rm |
Non con trolling interests Rm |
Other equity instru ment holders2 Rm |
Ordinary share holders' equity Rm |
Retained earnings Rm |
Other reserves Rm |
Share based payment reserve Rm |
Own credit risk reserve Rm |
Fair value through OCI reserve1 Rm |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 199 063 190 |
24 955 | 9 047 | 165 061 190 |
149 118 190 |
222 | (1 025) | 34 | 523 |
| 199 253 | 24 955 | 9 047 | 165 251 | 149 308 | 222 | (1 025) | 34 | 523 |
| 24 488 | 3 615 | 873 | 20 000 | 25 533 | (1) | (8) | 74 | |
| 30 696 | 4 380 | 873 | 25 443 | 25 443 | ||||
| (6 208) | (765) | (5 443) | 90 | (1) | (8) | 74 | ||
| (696) | ||||||||
| (293) | (293) | |||||||
| (13 964) | (1 011) | 1 069 | (14 022) | (15 082) | (1) | 1 309 | ||
| 1 190 | 50 | 1 140 | 159 | 981 | ||||
| (328) | 328 | |||||||
| 2 266 | 200 | 1 942 | 124 | |||||
| (30) | (30) | (30) | ||||||
| 291 | 221 | 70 | 89 | (1) | ||||
| (105) | 130 | (235) | 251 | |||||
| 132 754 |
7 | 132 747 |
747 | |||||
| 9 | 9 | 9 | ||||||
| (18 471) | (1 619) | (873) | (15 979) | (15 979) | ||||
| (18 680) | (1 715) | (873) | (16 092) | (16 092) | ||||
| 209 | 96 | 113 | 113 | |||||
| 209 484 | 27 266 | 10 989 | 171 229 | 159 063 | 220 | 284 | 26 | 597 |
5 Includes hedges of the group's equity-settled share incentive schemes.
AFS Refer to annexure F for the accounting policies relating to
All balances are stated net of tax, where applicable.
the reserves information.
6 Refer to annexure A for more detail on material transactions with non-controlling interests.
7 Comprises of the hyperinflation adjustments from Zimbabwe (R730 million) and South Sudan (R17 million).
partnerships.
1 The FVOCI reserve comprises of the FVOCI reserve for debt and equity financial investment. Refer to note 22 for more detail.
(2018: R322 million) on AT1 and preference dividend of R636 million (2018: R416 million). Refer to note 15 for more detail. 3 Refer to the accounting policy elections, transition and restatements on page 29 for more detail on the IFRS 16 transition.
2 Other equity instrument holders are holders of preference share capital and AT1 capital. The dividend paid comprises of net equity impact of R458 million
4 Where the group owns a majority stake in certain property partnerships and controls the management of those properties, including the power over all significant decisions around the use and maintenance of those properties, they are classified as businesses and the group consolidates its interest in those property
for the year ended 31 December 2018
| GROUP | Ordinary share capital and premium Rm |
Empower ment reserve Rm |
Treasury shares Rm |
Foreign currency translation reserve Rm |
Foreign currency hedge of net investment reserve Rm |
Cash flow hedging reserve Rm |
Regulatory statutory credit risk reserve Rm |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Balance at 1 January 2018 Total comprehensive income/(loss) for the year |
18 063 | (339) | (1 034) | (6 116) 4 557 |
(983) | (94) (100) |
2 141 | |
| Profit for the year Other comprehensive income/(loss) for the year |
4 557 | (100) | ||||||
| Increase in statutory credit risk reserve Unincorporated property partnerships capital reductions and distributions3 Transactions with shareholders and non-controlling interests recorded directly in equity |
(203) | 138 | (1 123) | (241) | 1 296 227 |
|||
| Equity-settled share-based payment transactions4 Transfer of vested equity options Issue of share capital and share premium and capitalisation of reserves Share buy-back Deferred tax on share-based payment transactions Transactions with non-controlling interests5 Net increase in treasury shares Redemption of preference shares Hyperinflation adjustment Net dividends paid Dividends paid to equity holders |
320 (523) |
138 | (13) (1 110) |
(241) | 227 | |||
| Dividends received from Tutuwa initiative and policyholders' deemed treasury shares |
||||||||
| Balance at 31 December 2018 | 17 860 | (201) | (2 157) | (1 800) | (983) | (194) | 3 664 |
1 The FVOCI reserve comprises of the FVOCI reserve for debt and equity financial investment. Refer to note 22 for more detail.
2 Other equity holders are holders of preference share capital and AT1 capital. The dividend paid comprises of net equity impact of R322 million on AT1
and preference dividend of R416 million. Refer to note 15 for more detail. 3 Where the group owns a majority stake in certain property partnerships and controls the management of those properties, including the power over all significant decisions around the use and maintenance of those properties, they are classified as businesses and the group consolidates its interest in those property partnerships.
4 Includes hedges of the group's equity-settled share incentive schemes.
5 Refer to annexure A for more detail on material transactions with non-controlling interests.
All balances are stated net of tax, where applicable.
AFS Refer to annexure F for the accounting policies relating to the reserves.
| Foreign currency Ordinary Foreign hedge Regulatory Fair value share Empower currency of net Cash flow statutory through capital ment Treasury translation investment hedging credit risk and premium reserve shares reserve reserve reserve reserve Rm Rm Rm Rm Rm Rm Rm |
OCI Own credit reserve1 risk reserve Rm |
payment Rm |
Share based reserve Rm |
Other reserves Rm |
Retained earnings Rm |
Ordinary share holders' equity Rm |
Other equity instrument holders2 Rm |
Non controlling interests Rm |
Total equity Rm |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Balance at 1 January 2018 18 063 (339) (1 034) (6 116) (983) (94) 2 141 Total comprehensive |
582 | (906) | 208 | 139 237 | 150 759 | 9 047 | 23 574 | 183 380 | |
| income/(loss) for the year 4 557 (100) |
(71) | 34 | 14 | 27 443 | 31 877 | 738 | 5 084 | 37 699 | |
| Profit for the year Other comprehensive |
27 453 | 27 453 | 738 | 4 452 | 32 643 | ||||
| income/(loss) for the year 4 557 (100) |
(71) | 34 | 14 | (10) | 4 424 | 632 | 5 056 | ||
| Increase in statutory credit 1 296 Unincorporated property |
(1 296) | ||||||||
| partnerships capital reductions and distributions3 Transactions with shareholders and |
(222) | (222) | |||||||
| non-controlling interests recorded directly in equity (203) 138 (1 123) (241) 227 |
12 | (119) | (16 266) | (17 575) | (738) | (3 481) | (21 794) | ||
| Equity-settled share-based payment transactions4 Transfer of vested equity options Issue of share capital and share |
(1 078) 959 |
1 678 (959) |
600 | 26 | 626 | ||||
| premium and capitalisation of 320 (523) Deferred tax on share-based |
320 (523) |
320 (523) |
|||||||
| payment transactions Transactions with |
(128) | (128) | (128) | ||||||
| non-controlling interests5 (13) (241) 227 Net increase in treasury shares (1 110) Redemption of preference |
12 | (1 594) (185) |
(1 609) (1 295) |
(1 386) (412) |
(2 995) (1 707) |
||||
| 138 | 35 (15 113) |
138 35 (15 113) |
(738) | 16 (1 725) |
138 51 (17 576) |
||||
| Dividends paid to equity holders Dividends received from Tutuwa |
(15 221) | (15 221) | (738) | (1 822) | (17 781) | ||||
| 108 | 108 | 97 | 205 | ||||||
| Balance at 31 December 2018 17 860 (201) (2 157) (1 800) (983) (194) 3 664 |
523 | 34 | (1 025) | 222 | 149 118 | 165 061 | 9 047 | 24 955 | 199 063 |
partnerships.
to the reserves.
1 The FVOCI reserve comprises of the FVOCI reserve for debt and equity financial investment. Refer to note 22 for more detail.
and preference dividend of R416 million. Refer to note 15 for more detail.
5 Refer to annexure A for more detail on material transactions with non-controlling interests.
4 Includes hedges of the group's equity-settled share incentive schemes.
All balances are stated net of tax, where applicable.
AFS Refer to annexure F for the accounting policies relating
2 Other equity holders are holders of preference share capital and AT1 capital. The dividend paid comprises of net equity impact of R322 million on AT1
3 Where the group owns a majority stake in certain property partnerships and controls the management of those properties, including the power over all significant decisions around the use and maintenance of those properties, they are classified as businesses and the group consolidates its interest in those property
The principal accounting policies applied in the presentation of the group and company's annual financial statements are set out below.
The group's consolidated and company's separate annual financial statements (annual financial statements) are prepared in accordance with IFRS as issued by the IASB, its interpretations adopted by the IASB, the SAICA Financial Reporting Guides as issued by the Accounting Practices Committee, Financial Pronouncements as issued by the Financial Reporting Standards Council, the JSE Listings Requirements, and the South African Companies Act. The annual financial statements have been prepared on the historical cost basis except for the following material items in the statement of financial position:
• Financial assets classified at FVOCI, financial assets
The following principal accounting policy elections in terms of IFRS have been made, with reference to the detailed accounting policies shown in brackets:
The annual financial statements are presented in South African rand, which is the presentation currency of the group and the functional and presentation currency of the company. All amounts are stated in millions of rand (Rm), unless indicated otherwise.
The accounting policies are consistent with those reported in the previous year except as required in terms of the adoption of the following:
• IAS 1 Presentation of Financial Statements (IAS 1) and IAS 8 Accounting Policies, Changes in Accounting Estimates and Errors (IAS 8), the amendments clarify the definition of material and how it should be applied by including in the definition guidance that until now has featured elsewhere in IFRS Standards. In addition, the explanations accompanying the definition have been improved. The amendments ensure that the definition of material is consistent across all IFRS Standards. The amendments will be applied prospectively.
The adoption of the above mentioned new and amended standards on 1 January 2019 did not affect the group's previously reported financial results or disclosures and did not impact the group's results upon transition. Accounting policies have been amended as relevant. Refer to annexure F detailed accounting policies.
IFRS 16 with effect from 1 January 2019, replaced IAS 17 as well as the related interpretations. IFRS 16 introduces a single lease accounting model for lessees which impacted the group's results upon transition and materially impacted the group's accounting policies for lessees, refer to the IFRS 16 section below for more detail on the transition.
With effect from 1 January 2019, IFRS 16 replaced IAS 17 as well as the related interpretations. The core principle of this standard is that the lessee and lessor should recognise all rights and obligations arising from leasing arrangements on balance sheet. The most significant change pertaining to the accounting treatment for operating leases is from the lessees' perspective. IFRS 16 eliminates the classification of leases for lessees as either operating or finance leases, as was required by IAS 17, and introduces a single lessee accounting model, where a right of use (ROU) asset together with a lease liability for the future payments is recognised for all leases with a term of more than 12 months, unless the underlying asset is of low value. IFRS 16 did not introduce significant changes for lessors, as a result the accounting policies applicable to the group as a lessor are not different from those under IAS 1, except for modification of lease contracts.
The group retrospectively adopted IFRS 16 on 1 January 2019 with an adjustment to the group's opening 1 January 2019 reserves and, as permitted by IFRS 16, did not restate its comparative financial results. Accordingly, the group and company's previously reported financial results up to 31 December 2018 are presented in accordance with the requirements of IAS 17 and for 2019, and future reporting periods, are presented in terms of IFRS 16.
On adoption of IFRS 16, the group recognised lease liabilities in relation to leases which had previously been classified as 'operating leases' under the principles of IAS 17. These liabilities were measured at the present value of the remaining lease payments, discounted using the lessee's incremental borrowing rate as at 1 January 2019. This incremental borrowing rate was calculated for each legal entity in the group utilising the internal funding rate of each entity.
Right of use assets were measured at the amount equal to the lease liability, adjusted by the amount of any prepaid or accrued lease payments relating to that lease recognised in the statement of financial position as at 31 December 2018.
In applying IFRS 16 for the first time, the group used the following practical expedients permitted by IFRS 16:
The group has also elected not to reassess whether a contract is, or contains, a lease at the date of initial application. Instead, for contracts entered into before the transition date the group and company relied on its assessment made applying IAS 17 and IFRIC 4 Determining whether an arrangement contains a Lease.
The group leases various offices, branch space and ATM space. Rental contracts are typically made for fixed average periods of between three to ten years but may have extension options as described below. Lease terms are negotiated on an individual basis and contain a wide range of different terms and conditions.
Until the 2018 financial year, leases of property, plant and equipment were classified as either finance or operating leases. Payments made under operating leases (net of any incentives received from the lessor) were charged to profit or loss on a straight-line basis over the period of the lease.
From 1 January 2019, all existing operating leases, which were either not less than 12 months or not deemed a low value asset, were recognised as a right of use asset and a corresponding lease liability.
Extension and termination options are included in a number of building and branch space leases across the group. These terms are used to maximise operational flexibility in terms of managing contracts. In determining the lease term, management considers all facts and circumstances that create an economic incentive to exercise an extension option, or not exercise a termination option. Extension options (or periods after termination options) are considered in the lease term when there is reasonable certainty that those options will be exercised. The assessment of reasonable certainty is reviewed if a significant event or a significant change in circumstances occurs which affects this assessment and that is within the control of the lessee.
The single lessee accounting model which comprises IFRS 16's most material impact for the group results in an increase of R4 886 million in total assets, R4 696 million increase in total liabilities and an increase in reserves of R190 million due to the release of the IAS 17 straight-lined lease provision. The total undiscounted operating lease commitments as at 31 December 2018 amount to R7 271 million, the lease liability as at 1 January 2019 amounted to R4 954 million, this difference primarily relates to discounting the operating lease commitments balance at the group's weighted average incremental borrowing rate which ranges from 2% – 15%, due to the multiple jurisdictions the group operates within.
| 31 December 2018 Rm |
IFRS 16 transition adjustment at 1 January 2019 Rm |
1 January 2019 Rm |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Assets | |||
| Property, equipment and right of use asset Other financial and non-financial assets1 |
19 194 2 107 768 |
5 394 (508) |
24 588 2 107 260 |
| Total assets | 2 126 962 | 4 886 | 2 131 848 |
| Equity and liabilities Equity |
199 063 | 190 | 199 253 |
| Equity attributable to the ordinary shareholder Equity attributable to other equity holders Equity attributable to non-controlling interests |
165 061 9 047 24 955 |
190 | 165 251 9 047 24 955 |
| Liabilities2 | 1 927 899 | 4 696 | 1 932 595 |
| Total equity and liabilities | 2 126 962 | 4 886 | 2 131 848 |
1 Materially relates to the derecognition of the IAS 17 prepaid lease asset.
2 Materially relates to the recognition of lease liabilities of R4 954 million and the release of the IAS 17 straight-lined lease provision.
| 31 December 2018 Rm |
IFRS 16 transition adjustment at 1 January 2018 Rm |
1 January 2019 Rm |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Ordinary share capital and share premium | 17 860 | 190 | 17 860 |
| Retained earnings | 149 118 | 149 308 | |
| Other | (1 917) | (1 917) | |
| Total ordinary shareholders' equity | 165 061 | 190 | 165 251 |
| Other equity instruments | 9 047 | 9 047 | |
| Non-controlling interests | 24 955 | 24 955 | |
| Total equity | 199 063 | 190 | 199 253 |
In terms of the group's accounting policy, trading revenue comprises all gains and losses from changes in the fair value of trading assets and liabilities, together with related interest income, expense and dividends. The group determined that certain other gains/losses were erroneously presented within trading revenue. Therefore, during 2019, the group restated trading revenue to exclude these gains and losses as it does not comprise gains and losses (including related interest income, expense and dividends) from changes in the fair value of trading assets and liabilities. These gains and losses have been presented within Other revenue as it is more representative of the nature of the gains and losses and better aligns to the group's gains and losses presentation policy. This correction has no impact on the group's consolidated income statement, total income, profit for the year and earnings per share. The impact on the non-interest revenue disclosure is as follows:
| 2018 | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| As previously presented income/ (expense) Rm |
Restatement Rm |
Restated income/ (expense) Rm |
|||
| Trading revenue Other revenue |
11 129 3 533 |
(330) 330 |
10 799 3 863 |
During 2019, it was identified that upon transition to IFRS 9 certain investments in unit trusts and portfolio managed funds were incorrectly classified as loans and advances, instead of financial investments per the group IFRS 9 presentation guidance. As a result, these assets were incorrectly classified as amortised cost instruments, rather than fair value through profit or loss due to the IFRS 9 contractual cash flow test not being met. However, the carrying amount of these assets approximate their fair values and accordingly did not impact the group's total assets, profit for the year, credit impairment charges and earnings per share.
The correction of this error amount to a reclassification between statement of financial position, income statement and statement of cash flows line items as indicated below:
| 2018 | 1 January 20181 | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| As previously reported debit/(credit) Rm |
Restatement Rm |
Restated debit/(credit) Rm |
As previously reported debit/(credit) Rm |
Restatement Rm |
Restated debit/(credit) Rm |
|
| Statement of financial position Financial investments Loans and advances |
547 405 1 120 668 |
1 121 (1 121) |
548 526 1 119 547 |
533 074 1 040 105 |
1 550 (1 550) |
534 624 1 038 555 |
| Income statement Interest income Other gains and losses on financial instruments2 |
(128 183) (672) |
117 (117) |
(128 066) (789) |
|||
| Statement of cash flows Adjusted for non-cash items and other adjustments included in the income statement Interest received |
(70 609) 128 520 |
117 (117) |
(70 492) 128 403 |
1 Amounts consist of 2017 balances, as reported, after transition to IFRS 9. Refer to the group's transition report for further information relating to the transition to IFRS 9.
In preparing the financial statements, estimates and assumptions are made that could materially affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities within the next financial year. Estimates and judgements are continually evaluated and are based on factors such as historical experience and current best estimates of future events. Post the implementation of IFRS 9 on 1 January 2018, no material changes to assumptions have occurred during the current year. The following represents the most material key management assumptions applied in preparing these financial statements.
For the purpose of determining the ECL:
The ECL measurement period for stage 1 exposures is 12 months (or the remaining tenor of the financial asset for CIB, including certain PBB business banking exposures, if the remaining lifetime is less than 12 months).
All exposures are assessed to determine whether there has been SICR at the reporting date, in which case an impairment provision equivalent to the lifetime expected loss is recognised. SICR thresholds, which are behaviour score based, are derived for each portfolio vintage of exposures with similar credit risk and are calibrated over time to determine which exposures reflect deterioration relative to the originated population and consequently reflect an increase in credit risk. Behaviour scorecards are based on a combination of factors which include the information relating to customers, transactions and delinquency behaviour (including the backstop when contractual payments are more than 30 days past due) to provide a quantitative assessment (score), and more specifically, a ranking of customer creditworthiness. The creditworthiness of a customer is summarised by a score, with high scores
corresponding to low-risk customers, and conversely, low scores corresponding to high-risk customers. These scores are often taken into account in determining the probability of default (PD) including relative changes in PD and absolute PD backstop. Credit risk has increased significantly since initial recognition when these criterion are met.
The group determines the SICR threshold by utilising an appropriate transfer rate of exposures that are less than 30 days past due (DPD) to stage 2. This transfer rate is such that the proportion of the 0 – 29 DPD book transferred into stage 2 is no less than the observed 12-month roll rate of 0 – 29 day accounts into 30 or more days in arrears. The SICR thresholds are reviewed regularly to ensure that they are appropriately calibrated to identify SICR by portfolio vintage and to consequently facilitate appropriate impairment coverage.
Where behaviour scores are not available, historical levels of delinquency are applied in determining whether there has been SICR. For all exposures, the rebuttable presumption of 30 days past due as well as exposures classified as either debt review or as 'watch-list' are used to classify exposures within stage 2.
The group uses a 25-point master rating scale to quantify the credit risk for each exposure. On origination, each client is assigned a credit risk grade within the group's 25-point master rating scale. Ratings are mapped to PDs by means of calibration formulae that use historical default rates and other data for the applicable portfolio. These credit ratings are evaluated at least annually or more frequently as appropriate.
CIB exposures are evaluated for SICR by comparing the credit risk grade at the reporting date to the origination credit risk grade. Where the relative change in the credit risk grade exceeds certain pre-defined ratings' migration thresholds or, when a contractual payment becomes more than 30 days overdue (IFRS 9's rebuttable presumption), the exposure is classified within stage 2. These pre-defined ratings' migration thresholds have been determined based on historic default experience which indicate that higher rated risk exposures are more sensitive to SICR than lower risk exposures. Based on an analysis of historic default experience, exposures that are classified by the group's master rating scale as investment grade (within credit risk grade 1 – 12 of the group's 25-point master rating scale) are assessed for SICR at each reporting date but are considered to be of a low credit risk. To determine whether a client's credit risk has increased significantly since origination, the group would need to determine the extent of the change in credit risk using the table below:
| Group Master rating scale band |
SICR trigger (from origination) |
||
|---|---|---|---|
| SB 1 – 12 | Low credit risk | ||
| SB 13 – 20 | 3 rating or more | ||
| SB 21 – 25 | 1 rating or more |
The group determines the macroeconomic outlook, over a planning horizon of at least three years, for each country based on the group's global outlook and its global view of commodities.
For PBB these forward-looking economic expectations are included in the ECL where adjustments are made based on the group's macro-economic outlook, using models that correlate these parameters with macro-economic variables. Where modelled correlations are not viable or predictive, adjustments are based on expert judgement to predict the outcomes based on the group's macro-economic outlook expectations. In addition to forward-looking macroeconomic information, other types of FLI, such as specific event risk, have been taken into account in ECL estimates when required, through the application of out-of-model adjustments. These out-of-model adjustments are subject to group credit governance committee oversight.
The group's macroeconomic outlooks are incorporated in CIB's client rating and include specific forward-looking economic considerations for the individual client. The client rating thus reflects the expected client risk for the group's expectation of future economic and business conditions. Further adjustments, based on point-in-time market data, are made to the PDs assigned to each risk grade to produce PDs and ECL representative of existing market conditions.
The definition of default, which triggers the credit impaired classification (stage 3), is based on the group's internal credit risk management approach and definitions. Whilst the specific determination of default varies according to the nature of the product, it is compliant to the Basel definition of default, and generally determined as occurring at the earlier of:
The group has not rebutted the 90 days past due rebuttable presumption.
An impaired loan is written off once all reasonable attempts at collection have been made and there is no material economic benefit expected from attempting to recover the balance outstanding. The following criteria must be met before a financial asset can be written off:
As an exception to the above requirements, where the exposure is secured (or for collateralised structures), the impaired loan can only be written off once the collateral has been realised. Post-realisation of the collateral, the shortfall amount can be written off if it meets the second requirement listed above.
Continuous assessment is required to determine whether the conditions that led to a financial asset being considered to be credit impaired (i.e. stage 3) still exist. Distressed restructured financial assets that no longer qualify as credit impaired remain within stage 3 for a minimum period of six months (i.e. six full consecutive monthly payments per the terms and conditions). In the case of financial assets with quarterly or longer dated repayment terms, the classification of a financial asset out of stage 3 may be made subsequent to an evaluation by the group's CIB or PBB credit governance committee (as appropriate), such evaluation will take into account qualitative factors in addition to compliance with payment terms and conditions of the agreement. Qualitative factors include compliance with covenants and with existing financial asset terms and conditions.
Where it has been determined that a financial asset no longer meets the criteria for significant increase in credit risk, the financial asset will be moved from stage 2 (lifetime expected credit loss model) back to stage 1 (12-month expected credit loss model) prospectively.
A range of base, bullish and bearish forward-looking economic expectations were determined, as at 31 December 2019, for inclusion in the group's forward-looking process and ECL calculation:
The Africa Regions base case comprises of the following outlook and conditions:
The global base case comprises of the following outlook and conditions:
The following table shows the main macroeconomic factors used to estimate the forward-looking impact on the ECL provision on financial assets. For each scenario, namely the base case (55%), bullish (25%) and bearish (20%) scenario, the average values of the factors over the next 12 months, and over the remaining forecast period, are presented.
| Macroeconomic factors – 2019 | Base scenario | Bearish scenario | Bullish scenario | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Next 12 months |
Remaining forecast period1 |
Next 12 months |
Remaining forecast period1 |
Next 12 months |
Remaining forecast period1 |
|
| South Africa | ||||||
| Inflation (%) | 4.60 | 4.86 | 6.03 | 5.58 | 4.38 | 4.24 |
| Real GDP (%) | 1.33 | 2.17 | 0.18 | 0.38 | 1.96 | 3.19 |
| Employment rate growth (%) | 0.51 | 0.94 | (0.13) | 0.17 | 0.89 | 1.78 |
| Household credit (%) | 6.53 | 6.82 | 5.52 | 6.50 | 6.96 | 7.50 |
| Exchange rate USD/ZAR | 14.83 | 14.43 | 16.44 | 15.32 | 13.70 | 13.58 |
| Prime (%) | 9.75 | 10.03 | 10.69 | 10.63 | 9.50 | 9.66 |
| Africa Regions2 | ||||||
| Inflation (%) | 7.60 | 7.10 | 9.20 | 8.40 | 6.50 | 6.30 |
| Policy rate (%) | 9.40 | 8.80 | 10.10 | 10.10 | 9.00 | 8.10 |
| 3m Tbill rate (%) | 8.70 | 8.30 | 9.90 | 9.30 | 8.10 | 7.70 |
| 6m Tbill rate (%) | 9.40 | 8.90 | 10.30 | 9.50 | 9.10 | 8.40 |
| Real GDP (%) | 3.70 | 4.60 | 2.60 | 3.60 | 4.50 | 5.40 |
| Global2 | ||||||
| Inflation (%) | 1.70 | 2.30 | 2.80 | 1.70 | 1.70 | 1.90 |
| Policy rate (%) | 0.30 | 1.00 | 0.10 | 0.80 | 1.30 | 1.90 |
| Exchange rate GBP/USD | 1.28 | 1.50 | 1.18 | 1.40 | 1.41 | 1.40 |
| Real GDP (%) | 0.90 | 1.90 | (0.50) | 1.40 | 2.00 | 1.90 |
| Unemployment rate (%) | 4.50 | 4.50 | 5.50 | 5.00 | 3.80 | 4.40 |
1 The remaining forecast period is 2021 to 2024.
2 Where multiple jurisdictions are considered, weighted averages are used.
| Base scenario | Bearish scenario | Bullish scenario | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Macroeconomic factors – 2018 | Next 12 months |
Remaining forecast period2 |
Next 12 months |
Remaining forecast period1 |
Next 12 months |
Remaining forecast period2 |
|
| South Africa | |||||||
| Inflation (%) | 5.5 | 5.3 | 6.5 | 5.8 | 4.8 | 5.1 | |
| Real GDP (%) | 1.8 | 2.5 | 0.8 | 1.0 | 2.4 | 2.9 | |
| Employment rate growth (%) | 1.2 | 1.3 | 0.1 | 0.6 | 1.4 | 1.6 | |
| Household credit (%) | 6.1 | 7.2 | 1.8 | 6.0 | 6.8 | 7.7 | |
| Exchange rate USD/ZAR | 13.4 | 13.8 | 14.9 | 14.5 | 12.1 | 12.7 | |
| Prime (%) | 10.3 | 10.5 | 10.5 | 10.8 | 10.0 | 10.0 | |
| Africa Regions2 | |||||||
| Inflation (%) | 8.8 | 7.5 | 10.3 | 9.9 | 7.7 | 6.3 | |
| Policy rate (%) | 10.5 | 10.2 | 11.9 | 11.7 | 10.0 | 8.9 | |
| 3m Tbill rate (%) | 9.4 | 9.7 | 11.1 | 10.9 | 8.5 | 8.1 | |
| 6m Tbill rate (%) | 9.9 | 9.7 | 11.3 | 10.8 | 9.2 | 8.7 | |
| Real GDP (%) | 4.6 | 5.4 | 3.6 | 4.4 | 5.3 | 6.3 | |
| Global1 | |||||||
| Inflation (%) | 1.8 | 2.1 | 2.7 | 1.6 | 1.6 | 2.0 | |
| Policy rate (%) | 0.8 | 1.4 | 0.2 | 0.5 | 1.0 | 1.8 | |
| Exchange rate GBP/USD | 1.5 | 1.5 | 1.0 | 1.3 | 1.5 | 1.5 | |
| Real GDP (%) | 1.0 | 1.7 | (1.4) | 0.9 | 1.7 | 2.0 | |
| Unemployment rate (%) | 4.4 | 4.7 | 5.3 | 5.3 | 4.1 | 4.2 |
1 The remaining forecast period is 2020 to 2023.
2 Where multiple jurisdictions are considered, weighted averages are used.
Management assessed and considered the sensitivity of the provision against the forward-looking economic conditions at a client level. The reviews and ratings of each client are performed at least annually. This process entails credit analysts completing a credit scorecard and incorporating forward-looking information. The weighting is reflected in both the determination of significant increase in credit risk as well as the measurement of the resulting provision for the individual client. Therefore the impact of forward-looking economic conditions is embedded into the total provision for each CIB client and cannot be stressed or separated out of the overall CIB provision.
The following table shows a comparison of the forward-looking impact on the provision as at 31 December 2019 based on the probability weightings of the above three scenarios resulting from recalculating each of the scenarios using a 100% weighting of the above factors.
| 2019 | 2018 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rm | % change of total PBB provision |
Rm | % change of total PBB provision |
|
| Forward-looking impact on IFRS 9 provision | 1 681 | 1 741 | ||
| Scenarios Base |
1 466 | (1) | 1 488 | (1) |
| Bearish | 2 970 | 4 | 2 719 | 3 |
| Bullish | 983 | (2) | 1 154 | (2) |
AFS Refer to note 7 loans and advances, for the carrying amounts of loans and advances and to the credit risk section of the risk and capital management report in annexure C for the group's assessment of the risk of loss arising out of the failure of counterparties to meet their financial or contractual obligations when due.
The Financial Stability Board has initiated a fundamental review and reform of the major interest rate benchmarks used globally by financial market participants. This review seeks to replace existing interbank offered rates (IBORs) with alternative risk-free rates (ARRs) to improve market efficiency and mitigate systemic risk across financial markets. This reform is at various stages globally. Accordingly, there is uncertainty surrounding the timing and manner in which the transition would occur and how this would affect various financial instruments held by the group. The group's derivative instruments are governed by ISDA's 2006 definitions. ISDA is currently reviewing its definitions in light of IBOR reform and the group expects it to issue standardised amendments to all impacted derivative contracts at a future date. No derivative instruments have been modified as at the reporting date. Consequently, significant judgement is applied in determining whether certain interest rate risk hedge relationships will continue to qualify for hedge accounting. As at 31 December 2019, management's view is that existing hedge relationships referencing IBORs continue to qualify for hedge accounting given market reliance on existing IBORs and the current absence of term structures in ARRs for products that span longer time periods. Management is monitoring market and accounting developments in this regard.
The group is in the earlier stages of establishing a committee within Treasury and Capital Management to manage the transition to alternative rates. The objectives of the committee would include evaluating the extent to which loans advanced and liabilities that reference IBOR cash flows, require amendments as a result of IBOR reform and how to manage communication about IBOR reform with counterparties. The committee will work closely with business teams across the group to establish pricing for new lending products indexed to the ARR in impacted jurisdictions.
AFS Refer to note 2 for derivative instruments disclosures.
In terms of IFRS, the group is either required to or elects to measure a number of its financial assets and financial liabilities at fair value, being the price that would, respectively, be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction in the principal (or most advantageous) market between market participants at the measurement date. Regardless of the measurement basis, the fair value is required to be disclosed, with some exceptions, for all financial assets and financial liabilities.
Fair value is a market-based measurement and uses the assumptions that market participants would use when pricing an asset or liability under current market conditions.
When determining fair value it is presumed that the entity is a going concern and is not an amount that represents a forced transaction, involuntary liquidation or a distressed sale. Information obtained from the valuation of financial instruments is used to assess the performance of the group and, in particular, provides assurance that the risk and return measures that the group has taken are accurate and complete.
The group's valuation control framework governs internal control standards, methodologies, and procedures over its valuation processes, which include:
Prices quoted in an active market: The existence of quoted prices in an active market represents the best evidence of fair value. Where such prices exist, they are used in determining the fair value of financial assets and financial liabilities.
Valuation techniques: Where quoted market prices are unavailable, the group establishes fair value using valuation techniques that incorporate observable inputs, either directly, such as quoted prices, or indirectly, such as those derived from quoted prices, for such assets and liabilities. Parameter inputs are obtained directly from the market, consensus pricing services or recent transactions in active markets, whenever possible. Where such inputs are not available, the group makes use of theoretical inputs in establishing fair value (unobservable inputs). Such inputs are based on other relevant input sources of information and incorporate assumptions that include prices for similar transactions, historic data, economic fundamentals, and research information, with appropriate adjustment to reflect the terms of the actual instrument being valued and current market conditions. Changes in these assumptions would affect the reported fair values of these financial instruments. Valuation techniques used for financial instruments include the use of financial models that are populated using market parameters that are corroborated by reference to independent market data, where possible, or alternative sources, such as, third-party quotes, recent transaction prices or suitable proxies. The fair value of certain financial instruments is determined using industry standard models such as, discounted cash flow analysis and standard option pricing models. These models are generally used to estimate future cash flows and discount these back to the valuation date. For complex or unique instruments, more sophisticated modelling techniques may be required, which require assumptions or more complex parameters such as correlations, prepayment spreads, default rates and loss severity.
Valuation adjustments: Valuation adjustments are an integral part of the valuation process. Adjustments include, but are not limited to:
In making appropriate valuation adjustments, the group applies methodologies that consider factors such as bid-offer spreads, liquidity, counterparty and own credit risk. Exposure to such illiquid risk drivers is typically managed by:
Validation and control: All financial instruments carried at fair value, regardless of classification, and for which there are no quoted market prices for that instrument, are fair valued using models that conform to international best practice
and established financial theory. These models are validated independently by the group's model validation unit and formally reviewed and approved by the market risk methodologies committee. This control applies to both off-the-shelf models, as well as those developed internally by the group. Further, all inputs into the valuation models are subject to independent price validation procedures carried out by the group's market risk unit. Such price validation is performed on at least a monthly basis, but daily where possible given the availability of the underlying price inputs. Independent valuation comparisons are also performed and any significant variances noted are appropriately investigated. Less liquid risk drivers, which are typically used to mark level 3 assets and liabilities to model, are carefully validated and tabled at the monthly price validation forum to ensure that these are reasonable and used consistently across all entities in the group. Sensitivities arising from exposures to such drivers are similarly scrutinised, together with movements in level 3 fair values. They are also disclosed on a monthly basis at the market risk and asset and liability committees.
Portfolio exception: The group has, on meeting certain qualifying criteria, elected the portfolio exception to measure the fair value of certain groups of financial assets and financial liabilities on a net basis.
The total amount of the change in fair value estimated using valuation techniques not based on observable market data that was recognised in profit or loss for the year ended 31 December 2019 was a net gain of R677 million (2018: R1 896 million net gain). Other financial instruments, not at level 3, are utilised to mitigate the risk of these changes in fair value.
AFS Refer to note 22 for the fair value disclosures.
The full portfolio of the South African located properties were independently valued as at 31 December 2019 by registered professional valuers, namely Broll Valuation Advisory Services and Jones Lang LaSalle Proprietary Limited, both of which are registered valuers in terms of the Property Valuers Professional Act, No 47 of 2000 and are registered with the Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors. The Kenyan and Nigerian located properties were independently valued as at 31 December 2019 by various registered professional valuers in each territory.
The valuation of the South African properties is prepared in accordance with the guidelines of and in accordance with the appraisal and valuation manual of the Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors, adapted for South African law and conditions.
In the majority of cases, the properties have been valued using the discounted cash flow methodology whereby the forecasted net cash flow and residual value of the asset at the end of the forecasted cash flow period is discounted back to the valuation date, resulting in a present value of the asset.
The residual value is calculated by capitalising the net income forecasted for the 12-month period immediately following the final year of the cash flow at the exit capitalisation rate.
On the basis that turnover or profit rental income has a greater degree of uncertainty and risk than the contractual base rental, a risk premium of between 1% and 6% has been added to the discount rate and to the exit capitalisation rate, to reflect the greater investment risk associated with the variable rental element on a property by property basis.
Valuers may use any reasonable method for developing an appropriate discount rate with consideration being given to:
The discount rate and exit capitalisation rate are then tested for reasonableness and benchmarked against recent comparable sales and surveys prepared by the MSCI and South African Property Owners Association (SAPOA).
AFS Refer to note 11 for investment property disclosures.
The group controls and consolidates an entity where the group has power over the entity's relevant activities; is exposed to variable returns from its involvement with the investee; and has the ability to affect the returns through its power over the entity, including Structured Entities (SEs). Determining whether the group controls another entity requires judgement by identifying an entity's relevant activities, being those activities that significantly affect the investee's returns, and whether the group controls those relevant activities by considering the rights attached to both current and potential voting rights, de facto control and other contractual rights including whether such rights are substantive.
Interests in unconsolidated SEs that are not considered to be a typical customer-supplier relationship are required to be identified and disclosed. The group regards interest to be a typical customer-supplier relationship where the level of risk inherent in that interest in the SE exposes the group to a similar risk profile to that found in standard market-related transactions. The group sponsors an SE where it provides financial support to the SE when not contractually required to do so. Financial support may be provided by the group to an SE for events such as litigation, tax and operational difficulties.
AFS Refer to annexure A for detail on subsidiaries, consolidated and unconsolidated structured entities within the group.
The group accounts for its interests in investment funds as associates where the group is the fund manager, for which there is an irrevocable fund management agreement, and the group has a monetary interest in the particular fund. Such associates are equity accounted unless designated to be measured at fair value through profit or loss.
AFS Refer to annexure B for detail on associates and joint ventures.
The group reviews its assets under construction and assets brought into use for impairment at each reporting date and tests the carrying value for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount (or components of the carrying amount) may not be recoverable. These circumstances include, but are not limited to, new technological developments, obsolescence, changes in the manner in which the software is used or is expected to be used, changes in discount rates or changes in estimates of related future cash benefits. The impairment tests are performed by comparing an asset's recoverable amount to its carrying amount. The review and testing of assets for impairment inherently requires significant management judgement as it requires management to derive the estimates of the identified assets' future cash flows in order to derive the asset's recoverable amount.
The recoverable amount is determined as the higher of an asset's fair value less cost of disposal and its value in use. The value in use is calculated by estimating future cash benefits that will result from each asset and discounting those cash benefits at an appropriate discount rate.
During the 2019 financial year, certain of the group's computer software assets' recoverable values were determined to be lower than their carrying values and were impaired by an amount of R234 million (2018: R449 million). These impairments are excluded from the group's headline earnings.
AFS Refer to note 13 for intangible asset disclosure, as well as annexure F for more detail on the accounting policy relating to computer software, the capitalisation thereof, as well as amortisation and impairment policies.
In terms of IFRS, the group is required on an annual basis to test its recognised goodwill for impairment. The impairment tests are performed by comparing the cash-generating units' (CGUs') recoverable amounts to the carrying amounts in the functional currency of the CGU being assessed for impairment. The recoverable amount is defined as the higher of the entity's fair value less costs of disposal and its value in use. The review and testing of goodwill for impairment inherently requires significant management judgement as management needs to estimate the identified CGU's future cash flows. The principal assumptions considered in determining an entity's value in use include:
The following table summarises the impairment test methodology applied and the key inputs used in testing the group's goodwill relating to Stanbic IBTC Holdings PLC and Stanbic Holdings Plc (previously CFC Stanbic Holdings).
| Stanbic IBTC Holdings PLC Value in use |
Stanbic Holdings PLC (Kenya) Value in use |
|||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | 2018 | 2019 | 2018 | |
| Discounted cash flow | ||||
| Discount rate (nominal)(%) | 17.6 | 21.7 | 16.9 | 17.6 |
| Terminal growth rate (nominal)(%) | 7.0 | 10.0 | 9.1 | 7.3 |
| Forecast period (years)1 | 10 | 10 | 8 | 8 |
1 In the instance where the group values subsidiaries where the long-term strategy is to hold and grow the investment, the preferred approach is to value future cash flows over a longer period in order to avoid placing too much value on the terminal cash flow period.
AFS Note 13 summarises the group's impairment test results and the main components of goodwill.
The group is subject to direct and indirect taxation in a number of jurisdictions. There may be transactions and calculations for which the ultimate tax determination has an element of uncertainty in the ordinary course of business. Where the final tax determination is different from the amounts that were initially recorded, such differences will impact the income tax and deferred tax provisions, disclosed in note 14 and note 38, respectively, in the period in which such determination is made.
Uncertain tax positions are provided for in accordance with the criteria defined within IAS 12 Income Taxes and IFRIC 23. Deferred tax assets are reviewed at each reporting date and are reduced to the extent that it is no longer probable that the related tax benefit will be realised.
The most significant management assumption is the forecasts that are used to support the probability assessment that sufficient taxable profits will be generated by the entities in the group in order to utilise the deferred tax assets.
AFS Refer to note 14 and note 37.
The group's post-employment benefits consist of both postemployment retirement funds and healthcare benefits for South African operations which have been deemed to be most material. The measurement of the group's obligations to fund these benefits are derived from actuarial valuations performed by the appointed actuaries taking into account various assumptions. The funds are subject to a statutory financial review by the group's independent actuaries at intervals of not more than three years.
The principal assumptions used in the determination of the group's obligations include the following:
| Retirement fund | Post-employment medical aid fund | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | 2018 | 2019 | 2018 | |||
| Discount rate | Nominal government bond yield curve |
Nominal government bond yield curve |
Nominal government bond yield curve |
Nominal government bond yield curve |
||
| Return on investments (discount rate of term equal to discounted mean term of liabilities)1 |
9.28% to 11.37% | 9.64% to 10.88% | Unfunded liability and therefore there is no asset backing portfolio |
Unfunded liability and therefore there is no asset backing portfolio |
||
| Salary/benefit inflation | Future salary increases based on inflation curve plus 1% – 2% pa to each point on the curve |
Future salary increases based on inflation curve plus 1% – 2% pa to each point on the curve |
Not applicable to fund |
Not applicable to fund |
||
| Medical cost inflation (applicable to members who retired before 1 January 2013)2 |
Not applicable to fund |
Not applicable to fund |
Inflation curve adjusted by 1% |
Inflation curve adjusted by 1% |
||
| Medical cost inflation (applicable to all other members) |
Not applicable to fund |
Not applicable to fund |
Curve implied by the difference between a nominal government bond curve and an index-linked bond |
Curve implied by the difference between a nominal government bond curve and an index-linked bond |
||
| CPI inflation | Difference between nominal and index-linked bond yield curves |
Difference between nominal and index-linked bond yield curves |
Difference between nominal and index-linked bond yield curves |
Difference between nominal and index-linked bond yield curves |
||
| Pension increase in allowance | Inflation rate | Inflation rate | Not applicable to fund |
Not applicable to fund |
||
| Remaining service life of employees (years) |
8.37 | 9.33 | 4 years 11 months and 11 years 10 months |
5 years 6 months, and 12 years 4 months |
1 This relates to members of material retirement funds within the group.
2 This relates to members within the employment of Liberty.
AFS Refer to note 43 for further details regarding the group's post-employment benefits.
Policyholder liabilities under insurance contracts issued and reinsurance assets held are derived from actual claims submitted which are not settled at the reporting date, and estimates of the net present value of future claims and benefits under existing contracts, offset by probable future premiums to be received or paid (net of expected service costs). The key assumptions applied and analysis of their sensitivity have been detailed in the insurance risk and sensitivity analysis components of the risk and capital management report in annexure C.
AFS Refer to annexure C.
An appropriate base table of standard mortality or morbidity is chosen depending on the type of contract and class of business. Industry standard tables are used for smaller classes of business. Company-specific tables, based on graduated industry standard tables modified to reflect the company-specific experience, are used for larger classes. Investigations into mortality and morbidity experience are performed at least once a year for all classes of business. The period of investigation extends over at least the latest three full years. Assumptions are set as the best estimate taking into account all relevant information. The results of the investigation are an input used to set the valuation assumptions, which are applied as an adjustment to the respective base table. In setting the assumptions, provision is made for expected Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome (Aids)-related claims. For contracts insuring survivorship, an allowance is made for future mortality improvements based on expected future trends.
The withdrawal assumptions are based on the most recent withdrawal investigations taking into account past, as well as expected future trends. The withdrawal investigations are performed at least once a year for all classes of business. The period of investigation extends over at least the latest two full years. Assumptions are set as the best estimate taking into account all relevant information. The withdrawal rates are analysed by product type and policy duration as rates vary considerably by these two factors. Typically the assumptions are higher for risk type products than for investment type products and are higher at early durations. The surrender values assumed are as per the terms and conditions and any other regulatory restrictions in place at the financial position date.
Future investment returns are set for the main asset classes as follows:
The overall investment return for a block of business is based on the investment return assumptions allowing for the current mix of assets supporting the liabilities. The pre-taxation discount rate is set at the same rate. The rate averaged across these blocks of business is 10.4% per annum in 2019 (2018: 10.6% per annum). Where appropriate the investment return assumption is adjusted to make allowance for investment expenses and taxation.
An expense analysis is performed on the actual expenses incurred, split between acquisition and maintenance expenses, in the calendar year preceding the reporting date. This analysis is used to calculate the acquisition costs incurred. The budget in respect of the following year approved by the board is used to set the maintenance expense assumption.
The expense inflation assumption is set taking into consideration, market implied inflation, the expected future development of the number of in-force policies, as well as the expected future profile of maintenance expenses. The expense inflation assumption for pure risk, life annuity, disability in payment and guaranteed endowments business is consistent with market implied inflation rates. For other classes of business the inflation rate is set at the effective ten-year gilt yield curve rate (gilt rate) less 1.75% when the gilt rate is above 7.25%. The expense inflation rate is set at 72% of the gilt rate when this is below 5.25%. At gilt rates between 5.25% and 7.25% the inflation rate is interpolated to ensure a smooth transition between the two methodologies. This results in a best estimate inflation assumption of 7.42% at 31 December 2019 (2018: 7.67%).
Assumptions as to the amount and timing of future income tax and capital gains tax (CGT) payments are based upon the applicable tax law and rates effective as at the reporting date and as set out in the Income Tax Act. Allowance is also made for dividends withholding tax at the rate applicable at the reporting date. Deferred taxation liabilities, in particular a provision for future CGT in respect of unrealised capital gains/(losses), have been taken into account using the full face value.
No correlations between assumptions are allowed for.
In the valuation of the policyholder and reinsurance contracts, voluntary premium increases that give rise to expected profits within broad product groups are not allowed for. However, compulsory increases and increases that give rise to expected losses within broad product groups are allowed for. This is consistent with the requirements of the Standard Actuarial Practice (SAP) 104.
The assumptions used to value embedded derivatives in respect of policyholder contracts are set in accordance with Advisory Practice Notes (APN) 110. Account is taken of the yield curve at the valuation date. Both implied market volatility and historical volatility are taken into account when setting volatility assumptions. Correlations between asset classes are set based on historical data. Over sixteen thousand simulations are performed in calculating the liability.
Assumptions used in the valuation of policyholder and reinsurance contracts are set by references to local guidance, taxation legislation and where applicable to the Actuarial Society of South Africa guidance. Economic assumptions are set by reference to local economic conditions at the valuation date. Margins are allowed for as prescribed by local guidance and regulations.
Using the simulated investment returns the prices and implied volatilities of the following instruments are:
| Price | Volatility | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Instrument | 2019 % |
2018 % |
2019 % |
2018 % |
|
| A one-year at-the-money (spot) put on the FTSE1 /JSE |
|||||
| Top 40 index | 4.89 | 5.98 | 17.09 | 20.76 | |
| A one-year put on the FTSE/JSE Top 40 index, with a strike | |||||
| price equal to 80% of spot | 1.02 | 1.53 | 21.57 | 24.88 | |
| A one-year at-the-money (forward) put on the FTSE/JSE | |||||
| Top 40 index | 6.34 | 7.73 | 16.37 | 19.98 | |
| A five-year at-the-money (spot) put on the FTSE/JSE | |||||
| Top 40 index | 7.81 | 7.68 | 20.9 | 22.30 | |
| A five-year put on the FTSE/JSE Top 40 index, with a strike | |||||
| price equal to 1,045# of spot | 14.89 | 14.29 | 20.04 | 21.47 | |
| A five-year (forward) put on the FTSE/JSE Top 40 index | 15.37 | 16.34 | 20.00 | 21.29 | |
| A five-year put with a strike price equal to 1,045# of spot on | |||||
| an underlying index constructed as 60% FTSE/JSE Top 40 and 40% All Bond Index (ALBI), with rebalancing of |
|||||
| the underlying index back to these weights taking place annually | 6.86 | 6.14 | |||
| A 20-year at-the-money (spot) put on the FTSE/JSE Top 40 index | 3.37 | 3.04 | 26.97 | 27.22 | |
| A 20-year put on the FTSE/JSE Top 40 index, with a strike price | |||||
| equal to 1,0420# of spot | 15.67 | 14.34 | 28.15 | 28.44 | |
| A 20-year at-the-money (forward) put on the FTSE/JSE | |||||
| Top 40 index | 27.36 | 27.71 | 28.74 | 29.16 | |
| A 20-year put option based on an interest rate with a strike equal | |||||
| to the present 5-year forward rate as at maturity of the put | |||||
| option, which pays out if the 5-year interest rate at the time | |||||
| of maturity (in 20 years) is lower than the strike price | 0.57 | 0.52 |
1 Financial Times Stock Exchange.
AFS Refer to note 8 for disclosures on policyholders' contracts.
The principal assumptions taken into account in determining the value at which provisions are recorded at, include determining whether there is an obligation, as well as assumptions about the probability of the outflow of resources and the estimate of the amount and timing for the settlement of the obligation. For legal provisions, management assesses the probability of the outflow of resources by taking into account historical data and the status of the claim in consultation with the group's legal counsel. In determining the amount and timing of the obligation once it has been assessed to exist, management exercises its judgement by taking into account all available information, including that arising after the balance sheet date up to the date of the approval of the financial statements.
AFS Refer to note 24 for details regarding the group's legal proceedings defended.
ICBCS, in which the group is a 40% shareholder, incurred a loss of USD248 million for the 2019 financial year, which includes losses and provisions relating to a single client loss, refer below for detail, of USD198 million and restructuring costs of USD30 million following the closure of certain regional offices and management actions to reduce operational costs.
The single client loss arose as a result of an explosion at the Philadelphia Energy Solutions (PES) oil refinery complex on the East Coast of the United States. PES filed for bankruptcy protection in July 2019 and various associated actions are currently before the courts. ICBCS is a named beneficiary of certain policies covering Business Interruption in relation to the PES event. ICBCS has lodged a claim with the insurance company and is asserting the priority of its claim. As at 31 December 2019, in accordance with IAS 37 Provisions, Contingent Liabilities and Contingent Assets, ICBCS has not recognised any insurance recoveries as the significant uncertainty regarding the amount and timing of the insurance recoveries means that the recognition criteria for insurance recoveries are not yet satisfied. The bankruptcy process of PES and insurance claims process are ongoing.
Following a review of ICBCS's business model, the ICBCS board has taken actions to reduce costs and simplify ICBCS's business model and will focus on driving efficiencies through working more closely with the ICBC. As at 31 December 2019, having issued additional tier 1 (AT1) capital to ICBC, ICBCS was sufficiently capitalised to meet its regulatory requirements and to support the business levels indicated in its business plan.
Given the significant losses suffered by ICBCS and the deterioration of market conditions, the group reviewed the recoverable amount of the associate investment at 30 September 2019. At that time, the group took into consideration available information, applying a value in use (VIU) approach in determining the carrying value. Following this review, the value of the group's carrying value in ICBCS was impaired from USD383 million to USD220 million with an impairment of R2.4 billion recognised in earnings attributable to ordinary shareholders.
At 31 December 2019, after further losses recorded by ICBCS in the fourth quarter of 2019, including restructuring provisions, the group's 40% associate investment in ICBCS was carried at USD189 million (R2.6 billion).
The group has assessed the recoverable amount of its investment in ICBCS at 31 December 2019; consistent with the approach used at 30 September 2019, the group adopted a VIU approach to determine the recoverable amount utilising the latest available information at year end. Cash flow projections were based on future cash flows the group could derive from the investment, taking into consideration various scenarios. In addition, an appropriate discount rate of 9.8%, which reflects current market assessments of the time value of money and risks specific to ICBCS, was applied. Key inputs to the VIU include ICBCS management's most recent business plan projections. The VIU reflects the present value of the expected future cash flows and is based on the weighted average of potential business outcomes.
Based on the outcome of this analysis and the value derived, we conclude that the recoverable amount approximates carrying value and therefore no further impairment was recognised by the group at 31 December 2019. The group will continue to engage and work with ICBC and ICBCS to enable the business to generate acceptable returns.
| 2019 Rm |
2018 Rm |
|
|---|---|---|
| Coins and bank notes Balances with central banks1 |
16 700 58 588 |
20 681 64 464 |
| Total | 75 288 | 85 145 |
1 Included in this balance is R48 950 million (2018: R55 414 million) that primarily comprises of reserving requirements held with central banks within the countries of operation and are available for use by the group subject to certain restrictions and limitations levied by central banks within the respective countries. These balances are held at fair value through profit or loss.
All derivatives are classified either as held-for-trading or held-for-hedging. A summary of the total derivative assets and liabilities is shown in the table below.
| Fair value of assets | Fair value of liabilities | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | 2018 | 2019 | 2018 | ||
| Rm | Rm | Rm | Rm | ||
| Total derivative assets/(liabilities) held-for-trading | 67 777 | 49 009 | (65 677) | (53 194) | |
| Total derivative assets/(liabilities) held-for-hedging | 3 630 | 2 669 | (3 821) | (1 863) | |
| Total | 71 407 | 51 678 | (69 498) | (55 057) |
The risks associated with derivative instruments are monitored in the same manner as for the underlying instruments. Risks are also measured across the product range in order to take into account possible correlations. All derivatives are classified either as held-for-trading or held-for-hedging.
In the normal course of business, the group enters into a variety of foreign exchange, interest rate, commodity, credit and equity derivative transactions in accordance with the group's risk management policies and practices. Derivative instruments used by the group are held for both trading and hedging purposes and include swaps, options, forwards, futures and other similar types of instruments based on foreign exchange rates, interest rates, credit risk and the prices of commodities and equities.
A summary of the total derivative assets and liabilities are shown in the table below.
The group enters into derivative contracts to address client demand, both as a market maker in the wholesale markets and in structuring tailored derivatives for clients. The group also takes proprietary positions for its own account. Trading derivative products include the following:
| Fair value of assets | Fair value of liabilities | Contract/notional amount1 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 Rm |
2018 Rm |
2019 Rm |
2018 Rm |
2019 Rm |
2018 Rm |
|
| Foreign exchange derivatives | 31 397 | 22 255 | (25 759) | (20 503) | 1 556 250 | 1 367 876 |
| Interest rate derivatives | 29 496 | 22 678 | (31 678) | (26 886) | 5 359 314 | 5 128 918 |
| Commodity derivatives | 170 | 204 | (119) | (194) | 7 507 | 15 585 |
| Credit derivatives | 1 277 | 1 013 | (4 356) | (2 814) | 91 603 | 77 455 |
| Equity derivatives | 5 437 | 2 859 | (3 765) | (2 797) | 2 766 430 | 2 444 740 |
| Total | 67 777 | 49 009 | (65 677) | (53 194) | 9 781 104 | 9 034 574 |
1 The notional amount is the sum of the absolute value of all contracts for both derivative assets and liabilities. The amount cannot be used to assess the market risk associated with the positions held and should be used only as a means of assessing the group's participation in derivative contracts.
Where all relevant criteria are met, derivatives are classified as derivatives held-for-hedging and hedge accounting is applied to remove the accounting mismatch between the derivative (hedging instrument) and the underlying instruments (hedged item). All qualifying hedging relationships are designated as either fair value or cash flow for recognised assets or liabilities and highly probable forecast transactions. The group applies hedge accounting in respect of foreign currency risk, equity risk and interest rate risk. Refer to annexure F on page 195 for more information of these hedging strategies.
| Fair value | Maturity | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Assets Rm |
Liabilities Rm |
Net fair value Rm |
Less than one year Rm |
Between one to five years Rm |
Over five years Rm |
Contract/ notional amount1 Rm |
Fair value gain/(loss) Rm |
|
| 2019 Interest rate risk fair value hedging relationships |
3 171 | (1 725) | 1 446 | 852 | 1 024 | (430) | 194 840 | 650 |
| Interest rate swaps Cross-currency interest rate swaps |
3 171 | (1 709) (16) |
1 462 (16) |
852 | 1 040 (16) |
(430) | 194 188 652 |
610 40 |
| Total | 3 171 | (1 725) | 1 446 | 852 | 1 024 | (430) | 194 840 | 650 |
| 2018 Interest rate risk fair value hedging |
||||||||
| relationships | 523 | (1 190) | (667) | (20) | (158) | (489) | 105 003 | (26) |
| Interest rate swaps | 523 | (1 190) | (667) | (20) | (158) | (489) | 105 003 | (26) |
| Total | 523 | (1 190) | (667) | (20) | (158) | (489) | 105 003 | (26) |
1 The notional amount is the sum of the absolute value of all contracts for both derivative assets and liabilities. The amount cannot be used to assess the market risk associated with the positions held and should be used only as a means of assessing the group's participation in derivative contracts.
| Fair value | Fair value | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Assets Rm |
Liabilities Rm |
Accumulated fair value gain/(loss) at 31 December Rm |
(loss)/gain used to test hedge ineffective ness Rm |
Fair value hedge adjustments for the period Rm |
|
| 2019 | |||||
| Interest rate risk fair value hedging relationships |
|||||
| Financial investments | 1 908 | 390 | (90) | (90) | |
| Subordinated debt | (7 816) | 107 | (176) | (176) | |
| Loans and advances to customers | 39 492 | (869) | 606 | 606 | |
| Deposits and debt funding | (65 273) | 550 | (852) | (852) | |
| Total | 41 400 | (73 089) | 178 | (512) | (512) |
| 2018 | |||||
| Interest rate risk fair value hedging relationships |
|||||
| Financial investments | 328 | 34 | 34 | ||
| Subordinated debt | (2 033) | 19 | 15 | 15 | |
| Loans and advances to customers | 28 276 | 656 | (206) | (206) | |
| Deposits and debt funding | (60 460) | 114 | 192 | 192 | |
| Total | 28 604 | (62 493) | 789 | 35 | 35 |
2.3.3 Derivatives designated as hedging instruments in cash flow hedging relationships1
| Fair value | Maturity | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Assets Rm |
Liabilities Rm |
Net fair value Rm |
Less than one year Rm |
Between one to five years Rm |
Over five years Rm |
Contract/ notional amount Rm |
Fair value gain/(loss) Rm |
|
| 2019 Foreign currency risk cash flow hedging |
||||||||
| relationships | 262 | (413) | (151) | 83 | (234) | 80 905 | 662 | |
| Currency forwards Currency swaps |
259 3 |
(114) (299) |
145 (296) |
150 (67) |
(5) (229) |
76 120 4 785 |
339 323 |
|
| Equity price risk cash flow hedging relationships |
197 | (286) | (89) | (36) | (53) | 661 | (90) | |
| Equity forwards | 197 | (286) | (89) | (36) | (53) | 661 | (90) | |
| Interest rate risk cash flow relationships |
(1 397) | (1 397) | (480) | (671) | (246) | 2 950 | (6) | |
| Cross-currency interest rate swaps Currency swaps |
(11) (1 386) |
(11) (1 386) |
(480) | (11) (660) |
(246) | 653 2 297 |
11 (17) |
|
| Total | 459 | (2 096) | (1 637) | (433) | (958) | (246) | 84 516 | 566 |
| 2018 Foreign currency risk cash flow hedging relationships |
160 | (240) | (80) | (74) | (6) | 8 913 | (241) | |
| Currency forwards Currency swaps |
59 101 |
(96) (144) |
(37) (43) |
(31) (43) |
(6) | 4 932 3 981 |
(42) (199) |
|
| Equity price risk cash flow hedging relationships |
383 | (433) | (50) | (17) | (33) | 550 | (128) | |
| Equity forwards | 383 | (433) | (50) | (17) | (33) | 550 | (128) | |
| Interest rate risk cash flow |
||||||||
| relationships | 1 603 | 1 603 | 132 | 1 248 | 223 | 2 501 | (133) | |
| Currency swaps | 1 603 | 1 603 | 132 | 1 248 | 223 | 2 501 | (133) | |
| Total | 2 146 | (673) | 1 473 | 41 | 1 209 | 223 | 11 964 | (502) |
1 The note disclosure has been disaggregated to provide a better analysis of cash flow hedging relationships. This change had no impact on the SOFP.
| 2019 Rm |
2018 Rm |
|
|---|---|---|
| Fair value gain/(loss) used to test hedge ineffectiveness Financial investments |
53 | 125 |
| Interest rate risk cash flow hedging relationships | 53 | 125 |
| Loans and advances | (294) | 168 |
| Foreign currency risk cash flow hedging relationships | (294) | 168 |
| Share scheme liabilities (excludes equity DBS) | 53 | 109 |
| Equity price risk cash flow hedging relationships | 53 | 109 |
| Other operating expenses | (297) | 82 |
| Foreign currency risk cash flow hedging relationships | (297) | 82 |
| Total | (485) | 484 |
Hedge ineffectiveness in qualifying hedge relationships arises predominantly due to the presence of costs contained within hedging instruments. This ineffectiveness was recognised in profit or loss together with the gains and losses on the underlying hedged item according to the nature of the risk being hedged as follows:
| Other operating expenses loss Rm |
Trading revenue gain/(loss) Rm |
Net interest income loss Rm |
Total Rm |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | ||||
| Fair value hedges | 138 | 138 | ||
| Interest rate risk fair value hedging relationships | 138 | 138 | ||
| Cash flow hedges | (37) | 118 | 81 | |
| Foreign currency risk cash flow hedging relationships Equity price risk cash flow hedging relationships Interest rate risk cash flow hedging relationships |
(37) | 71 47 |
71 (37) 47 |
|
| Total | (37) | 118 | 138 | 219 |
| 2018 Fair value hedges |
9 | 9 | ||
| Interest rate risk fair value hedging relationships | 9 | 9 | ||
| Cash flow hedges | (19) | 1 | (18) | |
| Foreign currency risk cash flow hedging relationships Equity price risk cash flow hedging relationships Interest rate risk cash flow hedging relationships |
(19) | 10 (9) |
10 (19) (9) |
|
| Total | (19) | 1 | 9 | (9) |
1 The note disclosure has been disaggregated to provide a better analysis of cash flow hedging relationships. This change had no impact on the statement of financial position (SOFP).
2.3.6 Reconciliation of movements in the cash flow hedging reserve
| Foreign currency risk Rm |
Equity price risk Rm |
Total Rm |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Balance at 1 January 2018 | (128) | 34 | (94) |
| Amounts recognised directly in OCI before tax1 | (374) | (128) | (502) |
| Add amounts released to profit or loss before tax: | 338 | 46 | 384 |
| Interest income | 49 | 46 | 49 |
| Trading revenue | 301 | 301 | |
| Other operating expenses | (12) | 34 | |
| Deferred tax | 6 | 4 | 10 |
| Non-controlling Interest | 8 | 8 | |
| Balance at 31 December 2018 | (150) | (44) | (194) |
| Amounts recognised directly in OCI before tax1 | 644 | (78) | 566 |
| Add amounts released to profit or loss before tax: | (373) | 81 | (292) |
| Interest income | 176 | 81 | 176 |
| Trading revenue | (386) | (386) | |
| Other operating expenses | (163) | (82) | |
| Deferred tax | (69) | (69) | |
| Non-controlling Interest | (15) | (15) | |
| Balance at 31 December 2019 | 37 | (41) | (4) |
1 Includes dividends received on equity forwards during the period.
The forecasted timing of the release of net cash flows from the cash flow hedging reserve into profit or loss at 31 December is as follows:
| Three months or less Rm |
After three months but within one year Rm |
After one year but within five years Rm |
More than five years Rm |
Total Rm |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 Net cash (outflow)/inflow |
16 | 51 | (28) | (43) | (4) |
| 2018 Net cash outflows |
(13) | (37) | (88) | (56) | (194) |
The table below sets out the aggregate net day one profit or loss yet to be recognised in profit or loss at the beginning and end of the period with a reconciliation of changes in the balances during the period.
| 2019 Rm |
2018 Rm |
|
|---|---|---|
| Unrecognised net profit at the beginning of the year Additional net profit on new transactions Recognised in trading revenue during the year Exchange differences |
176 387 (315) (7) |
160 299 (307) 24 |
| Unrecognised net profit at the end of the year | 241 | 176 |
| 2019 Rm |
2018 Rm |
|
|---|---|---|
| Collateral and other1 | 6 386 | 6 753 |
| Corporate bonds and floating rate notes | 40 581 | 27 180 |
| Government, municipality and utility bonds | 80 377 | 51 151 |
| Listed equities | 51 547 | 40 549 |
| Reverse repurchase and other collateralised agreements | 27 992 | 41 334 |
| Unlisted debt securities | 15 919 | 14 145 |
| Total | 222 802 | 181 112 |
1 The disclosure has been aggregated as part of the adoption of the amendments to IAS 1 and IAS 8, the aggregation did not impact the statement of financial position (SOFP). The comparative amount of R552 million other instruments is now disclosed with collateral of R6 201 million.
The table below sets out the aggregate net day one profit or loss yet to be recognised in profit or loss at the beginning and end of the period with a reconciliation of changes in the balances during the period.
| 2019 Rm |
2018 Rm |
|
|---|---|---|
| Unrecognised net profit at the beginning of the year | 845 | 642 |
| Additional net profit on new transactions | 233 | 339 |
| Recognised in trading revenue during the year | (178) | (136) |
| Unrecognised net profit at the end of the year | 900 | 845 |
The following table presents details of financial assets which have been sold or otherwise transferred, but which have not been derecognised in their entirety, and their associated, liabilities including any contingent liabilities where applicable. This table does not disclose the total risk exposure in terms of these transactions, instead it provides disclosures as required by IFRS.
| Carrying amount of transferred assets Rm |
Carrying amount of associated liabilities Rm |
Fair value of transferred assets1 Rm |
Fair value of associated liabilities1 Rm |
Net fair value1 Rm |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | |||||
| Bonds | 23 624 | (17 796) | 23 625 | (17 796) | 5 829 |
| Listed equities | 5 753 | 5 753 | 5 753 | ||
| Pledged assets (as recognised in the statement of financial position) Financial investments2 |
29 377 12 805 |
(17 796) (12 738) |
29 378 12 805 |
(17 796) (12 735) |
11 582 70 |
| Total | 42 182 | (30 534) | 42 183 | (30 531) | 11 652 |
| 2018 | |||||
| Bonds | 12 964 | (6 412) | 12 948 | (6 412) | 6 536 |
| Listed equities | 6 915 | (288) | 6 915 | (288) | 6 627 |
| Pledged assets (as recognised | |||||
| in the statement of financial position) | 19 879 | (6 700) | 19 863 | (6 700) | 13 163 |
| Financial investments2 | 9 262 | (9 261) | 9 265 | (9 259) | 6 |
| Total | 29 141 | (15 961) | 29 128 | (15 959) | 13 169 |
1 Where the counterparty has recourse to the transferred asset.
2 For these financial investments the counterparty is not permitted to sell or repledge the assets in the absence of default; hence, they are not classified as pledged assets.
The assets pledged by the group are strictly for the purpose of providing collateral to the counterparty. To the extent that the counterparty is permitted to sell or repledge the assets in the absence of default, they are classified in the statement of financial position as pledged assets.
The majority of other financial investments that do not qualify for derecognition include debt securities held by counterparties as collateral under repurchase agreements, listed equities held as collateral under scrip lending transactions and financial assets leased out to third-parties. Risks to which the group remain exposed include credit and interest rate risk.
During the current year, there were no instances of financial assets that were sold or otherwise transferred, but which were partially derecognised. Further, there were no instances of financial assets transferred and derecognised for which the group had continuing involvement.
As part of the reverse repurchase and securities borrowing agreements, the group has received securities which are not recorded in the statement of financial position that it is allowed to sell or repledge. The fair value of the financial assets accepted as collateral that the group is permitted to sell or repledge in the absence of default is R94 429 million (2018: R100 791 million).
The fair value of financial assets accepted as collateral and commodities received through commodity leases that have been sold, repledged or leased in terms of repurchase agreements or leasing transactions is R14 215 million (2018: R11 709 million).
These transactions are conducted under terms that are usual and customary to reverse repurchase and securities borrowing activities.
The group enters into transactions in the normal course of business by which it transfers recognised financial assets directly to third-parties or structured entities. These transfers may give rise to full derecognition of the financial assets concerned.
Full derecognition occurs when the group transfers substantially all the risks and rewards of ownership and its contractual right to receive cash flows from the financial assets or retains the contractual rights to receive the cash flows of the financial assets but assumes a contractual obligation to pay the cash flows to one or more recipients in an arrangement that meets IFRS derecognition requirements. The risks include interest rate, currency, prepayment and other price risks. However, where the group has retained substantially all of the credit risk associated with the transferred assets, it continues to recognise these assets.
The following table analyses the cumulative carrying amount of securitised financial assets that did not qualify for derecognition and the associated liabilities.
| Carrying amount of transferred assets1 Rm |
Fair value of transferred assets Rm |
Net fair value Rm |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 Mortgage loans2 |
45 751 | 45 730 | 45 730 |
| 2018 Mortgage loans2 |
45 954 | 44 747 | 44 747 |
1 The associated liabilities relating to the transferred assets only include external funding for the assets. The transferred assets are also funded by intercompany funding, which has been eliminated at a group level.
2 The group invests in vehicles specifically introduced to provide mortgage lending collateral against the Committed Liquidity Facility (CLF). To access the CLF, the South African Reserve Bank (SARB) requires a portfolio of collateral, which is identified as a portfolio of mortgage loans. The SARB requires that these assets are ring-fenced in a separate legal entity, supported by a clearly defined note structure. At 31 December 2019, the mortgages within these vehicles, Blue Shield Investments 01 (RF) Limited and Blue Shield Investments 02 (RF) Limited, amounted to R46 billion (2018: R46 billion).
| Total | Banking activities | Investment management and life insurance activities |
|||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 Rm |
2018 Rm |
2019 Rm |
2018 Rm |
2019 Rm |
2018 Rm |
||
| Corporate | 73 381 | 64 011 | 27 494 | 23 297 | 45 887 | 40 714 | |
| Sovereign | 205 927 | 197 473 | 167 341 | 161 552 | 38 586 | 35 921 | |
| Banking | 53 364 | 71 210 | 1 766 | 13 978 | 51 598 | 57 232 | |
| Mutual funds and unit-linked | |||||||
| investments1 | 99 499 | 86 155 | 1 315 | 1 316 | 98 184 | 84 839 | |
| Listed equities | 100 367 | 96 395 | 145 | 103 | 100 222 | 96 292 | |
| Unlisted equities | 8 179 | 6 506 | 4 195 | 3 521 | 3 984 | 2 985 | |
| Interest in associates and joint ventures held |
|||||||
| at fair value (annexure B) | 16 168 | 13 848 | 16 168 | 13 848 | |||
| Other instruments | 10 434 | 12 928 | 2 447 | 2 734 | 7 987 | 10 194 | |
| Total financial investments | 567 319 | 548 526 | 204 703 | 206 501 | 362 616 | 342 025 | |
| Accounting classification Net financial investments measured at amortised |
|||||||
| cost | 153 760 | 144 145 | |||||
| Gross financial investments measured at amortised cost Less: expected credit loss for |
153 828 | 144 339 | |||||
| financial investments measured at amortised |
|||||||
| cost2 | (68) | (194) | |||||
| Financial investments measured at fair value |
413 559 | 404 381 | |||||
| Financial investments measured at FVTPL |
368 512 | 350 044 |
Debt financial investments measured at FVOCI3, 4 43 763 53 083 Equity financial investments measured at FVOCI4 1 284 1 254
1 Refer to page 31 for more details on the restatement to banking activities' mutual funds and unit-linked investments.
2 Refer to note 34 for the credit impairment charges for the current year credit impairment charge of R45 million (2018: R82 million) on financial investments measured at amortised cost.
3 Refer to note 34 for the credit impairment charges for the current year credit impairment charge of R41 million (2018: R19 million) debt financial investments measured at fair value through OCI.
4 Refer to note 22.5.1 for the reconciliation of FVOCI reserve for equity financial investments and note 22.5.2 for the reconciliation of FVOCI reserve for debt financial investments.
The disposal group held for sale includes non-current assets held for sale relating to the Samrand Data Centre.
| 2019 | 2018 | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Rm |
Impairment1 Rm |
Net disposal group Rm |
Gross Rm |
Impairment Rm |
Net disposal group Rm |
|
| Samrand Data Centre ICBCA Liberty |
819 1 196 891 |
(307) | 819 1 196 584 |
1 011 | (249) | 762 |
| Total assets classified as held for sale | 2 906 | (307) | 2 599 | 1 011 | (249) | 762 |
| Financial investments Other assets Property, equipment and right of use assets Goodwill and Intangibles Interest in associate and joint ventures (note 10) Deferred tax assets |
261 443 857 126 1 196 23 |
(136) (22) (126) (23) |
261 307 835 1 196 |
265 504 39 85 118 |
(28) (18) (85) (118) |
265 476 21 |
| Total liabilities classified as held for sale – Liberty |
(246) | (246) | (237) | (237) | ||
| Provisions and other liabilities Current tax liabilities |
17 (263) |
17 (263) |
(232) (5) |
(232) (5) |
||
| Total | 2 660 | (307) | 2 353 | 774 | (249) | 525 |
1 The impairment in the disposal group relates to the provision in the SOFP at 31 December 2019, the impairment of the disposal group included in the headline earnings reconciliation includes a R14 million that was written off during the year.
During December 2019, the group's board approved the disposal of the group's data warehouse. The sale agreement which is expected to conclude in 2020 includes the freehold property, as well as the electromechanical equipment. The requirements of IFRS 5 were met during December 2019 and based on these, the assets subject to the sale agreement have been separately disclosed as non-current assets held for sale on the statement of financial position. The assets are measured at the lower of the carrying amount and fair value less costs to sell. The fair value less costs to sell is based on an assessment of what management believes a purchaser would value the assets, considering the current business viability and operations. The property and equipment was not impaired at 31 December 2019 the net carrying value amounted to R819 million. This is included in the central and other segments.
In November 2012, the group completed the disposal of a controlling interest in ICBCA.
The group retained a 20% shareholding in ICBCA, held by Standard Bank Group's wholly owned subsidiary, Standard Bank London Holdings Limited. This residual investment was classified as an investment in associates and accounted for using the equity accounting method in terms of IAS 28.
In the ICBCA shareholders' agreement, ICBC granted a put option to the group under which the group was given the right to sell its remaining shareholding in ICBCA to ICBC, by giving notice at any time between 1 December 2014 and 30 November 2019. The strike price of the put option was fixed at USD180.751 million. Having taken the independent advice required under the JSE Listings Requirements, on 8 August 2019, the group exercised the put option and gave the required notice to ICBC.
The transaction is subject to conditions precedent customary to transactions of this nature, including regulatory approvals in China. The completion date in respect of the transaction is anticipated to be in the first half of 2020. The group would seek to reinvest net proceeds received at completion of the transaction to support its African strategy.
Based on the above, the requirements of IFRS 5 were met on 8 August 2019 and equity accounting of this investment was ceased. Therefore, as at 31 December 2019, the investment in ICBCA has been disclosed as non-current assets held for sale and presented separately on the statement of financial position. The investment in ICBCA is measured at the lower of the carrying amount and fair value less costs to sell, being R1 196 million at 31 December 2019. The investment in ICBCA was not impaired at date of classification as held for sale, nor at year end. This is included in the other banking interests segment.
As part of the strategy refresh exercise conducted during 2018, various cash-generating units were identified as either sub scale or no longer applicable to Liberty's revised strategy. Consequently, the board approved a process of disposals and strategic partnership negotiations which is highly probable to lead to loss of control of these cash-generating units during 2019.
The disposal of three operations, being the short-term insurance technology start-up, and the asset management operations in Ghana and Botswana were concluded in the period under review.
The cash-generating units remaining as held for sale are asset management operations in Uganda and Kenya, health risk solutions and short-term insurance in Malawi.
Based on the requirements of IFRS 5, the assets and liabilities have been disclosed as disposal groups, and are separately disclosed on the statement of financial position. The disposal groups are measured at the lower of carrying amount and fair value less costs to sell, which lead to various impairments, as set out in the table above.
The potential sales are not discontinued operations as defined under IFRS 5 as they are not disposals of separate major lines of business or geographical areas of operation. Profit or loss from cash-generating units within disposal groups have therefore not been separately identified in the income statement. This is included in the Liberty segment.
| 2019 Rm |
2018 Rm |
|
|---|---|---|
| Loans and advances measured at fair value through profit or loss Net loans and advances measured at amortised cost |
161 1 180 906 |
1 204 1 118 343 |
| Gross loans and advances measured at amortised cost | 1 216 185 | 1 155 028 |
| Mortgage loans Vehicle and asset finance (note 7.2) Card debtors Corporate and sovereign Banking Other loans and advances1 |
378 003 94 833 34 612 425 427 104 904 178 406 |
361 830 89 651 32 395 397 261 110 852 163 039 |
| Expected credit losses on loans and advances (note 7.3) | (35 279) | (36 685) |
| Total loans and advances | 1 181 067 | 1 119 547 |
1 Restated. Refer to page 31 for further information on the restatement.
The maturity analysis is based on the remaining periods to contractual maturity from year end.
| 2019 | 2018 | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross advances Rm |
Unearned finance charges Rm |
Net advances Rm |
Gross advances Rm |
Unearned finance charges Rm |
Net advances Rm |
|
| Receivable within one year |
33 525 | (6 968) | 26 557 | 32 500 | (7 751) | 24 749 |
| Receivable between one and five years Receivable after |
80 595 | (13 027) | 67 568 | 77 584 | (13 181) | 64 403 |
| five years | 775 | (67) | 708 | 545 | (46) | 499 |
| Total | 114 895 | (20 062) | 94 833 | 110 629 | (20 978) | 89 651 |
Leases entered into are at market-related terms. Under the terms of the lease agreements, no contingent rentals are payable. Moveable assets are leased or sold to customers under finance leases and instalment sale agreements for periods varying between 12 and 84 months. Depending on the terms of the agreement, the lessee may have the option to purchase the asset at the end of the lease term.
| 2019 | 2018 | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Stage 1 Rm |
Stage 2 Rm |
Stage 3 Rm |
Total Rm |
Stage 1 Rm |
Stage 2 Rm |
Stage 3 Rm |
Total Rm |
|||
| Opening ECL Transfers between stages1 Net impairments (released)/raised |
5 740 986 (1 357) |
7 144 (1 032) 1 779 |
23 801 46 8 897 |
36 685 9 319 |
5 789 984 (1 232) |
8 275 (2 088) 1 066 |
20 975 1 104 7 403 |
35 039 7 237 |
||
| ECL on new exposure raised Subsequent changes in ECL Change in ECL due to derecognition |
1 707 (2 793) (271) |
1 009 922 (152) |
936 8 108 (147) |
3 652 6 237 (570) |
1 727 (2 718) (241) |
1 717 (329) (322) |
355 7 441 (393) |
3 799 4 394 (956) |
||
| Impaired accounts written off2, 3 Exchange and other movements3, 4 |
(231) | (364) | (12 990) 2 860 |
(12 990) 2 265 |
199 | (109) | (9 313) 3 632 |
(9 313) 3 722 |
||
| Closing ECL | 5 138 | 7 527 | 22 614 | 35 279 | 5 740 | 7 144 | 23 801 | 36 685 |
1 The group's policy is to transfer opening balances based on the ECL stage at the end of the reporting period. Therefore, exposures can be transferred directly from stage 3 to stage 1 as the curing requirements would have been satisfied during the reporting period. Furthermore, the expected credit loss recognised on new exposures originated during the reporting period (which are not included in opening balances) are included within the column 'ECL on new exposure raised' based on the exposure's ECL stage as at the end of the reporting period. It is therefore possible to disclose new/ originated exposures in stage 2 and 3.
2 The contractual amount outstanding on loans and advances that were written off during the period that are still subject to enforcement activities
is R4.8 billion (2018: R5.9 billion). 3 At 31 December 2018, interest in suspense (IIS) on accounts written off of R1 134 million was previously classified as part of exchange and other movements when it should have been included in the impaired accounts written off line within the note. The comparative has been restated to reflect this change.
4 Exchange and other movements include the net IIS, the time value of money (TVM) unwind raised and released during the period.
7.3.1 Expected credit loss reconciliation of loans and advances – per product
| Transfers between stages | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Stage 1 Rm |
Stage 2 Rm |
Stage 3 Rm |
Total transfers Rm |
|||
| 2019 Mortgage loans |
10 130 | (500) | 306 | 194 | ||
| Stage 1 Stage 2 Stage 3 |
1 037 2 018 7 075 |
(367) (133) |
367 (61) |
133 61 |
500 (306) (194) |
|
| VAF | 3 402 | (92) | 193 | (101) | ||
| Stage 1 Stage 2 Stage 3 |
770 948 1 684 |
(74) (18) |
74 119 |
18 (119) |
92 (193) 101 |
|
| Card debtors | 3 067 | (216) | 242 | (26) | ||
| Stage 1 Stage 2 Stage 3 |
643 980 1 444 |
0 (192) (24) |
192 0 50 |
24 (50) |
216 (242) 26 |
|
| Corporate | 8 495 | (8) | (107) | 115 | ||
| Stage 1 Stage 2 Stage 3 |
950 1 041 6 504 |
(9) 1 |
9 (116) |
(1) 116 |
8 107 (115) |
|
| Sovereign | 80 | 2 | (2) | |||
| Stage 1 Stage 2 Stage 3 |
73 2 5 |
2 | (2) | (2) 2 |
||
| Bank | 63 | |||||
| Stage 1 Stage 2 |
60 3 |
|||||
| Other loans and advances | 11 448 | (172) | 400 | (228) | ||
| Stage 1 Stage 2 Stage 3 |
2 207 2 152 7 089 |
(207) 35 |
207 193 |
(35) (193) |
172 (400) 228 |
|
| Total | 36 685 | (986) | 1 032 | (46) | ||
| Stage 1 Stage 2 Stage 3 |
5 740 7 144 23 801 |
(847) (139) |
847 185 |
139 (185) |
986 (1 032) 46 |
|
| Closing ECL Rm |
Exchange and other movements Rm |
TVM unwind and IIS movements Rm |
Impaired accounts written off Rm |
Net impairments raised/ (released) Rm |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10 910 | (119) | 1 046 | (1 069) | 922 |
| 667 | (12) | (858) | ||
| 1 910 | (24) | 222 | ||
| 8 333 | (83) | 1 046 | (1 069) | 1 558 |
| 3 720 | (128) | 210 | (1 017) | 1 253 |
| 663 | (199) | |||
| 991 | (57) | 293 | ||
| 2 066 | (71) | 210 | (1 017) | 1 159 |
| 2 656 | (2) | 129 | (2 213) | 1 675 |
| 592 | 1 | (268) | ||
| 975 | (3) | 240 | ||
| 1 089 | 129 | (2 213) | 1 703 | |
| 5 599 | (268) | 628 | (4 974) | 1 718 |
| 1 151 | (53) | 246 | ||
| 1 137 | (143) | 132 | ||
| 3 311 | (72) | 628 | (4 974) | 1 340 |
| 93 | 13 | |||
| 71 | ||||
| 17 5 |
13 | |||
| 45 | (79) | 61 | ||
| 45 | (76) | 61 | ||
| (3) | ||||
| 12 256 | (333) | 1 181 | (3 717) | 3 677 |
| 1 949 | (91) | (339) | ||
| 2 497 | (134) | 879 | ||
| 7 810 | (108) | 1 181 | (3 717) | 3 137 |
| 35 279 | (929) | 3 194 | (12 990) | 9 319 |
| 5 138 | (231) | (1 357) | ||
| 7 527 | (364) | 1 779 | ||
| 22 614 | (334) | 3 194 | (12 990) | 8 897 |
7.3 Expected credit loss reconciliation of loans and advances at amortised cost continued
7.3.1 Expected credit loss reconciliation of loans and advances – per product
1 At 31 December 2018 IIS on accounts written off of R1 134 million was previously classified as part of exchange and other movements when it should have been included in the impaired accounts written off line within the note. The comparative has been restated to reflect this change.
2 The disclosure has been disaggregated as part of the amendments to IAS 1 and IAS 8, the disaggregation did not impact the SOFP. The comparative amount of R2 619 million TVM unwind and IIS is now shown separately.
The below is an explanation of significant changes in the gross carrying amount on financial instruments used to determine the above changes in ECL:
| Transfers between stages Net impairments |
Impaired | Exchange | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Opening Total raised/ |
accounts | TVM unwind | and other | Closing |
| ECL Stage 1 Stage 2 Stage 3 transfers (released) Rm Rm Rm Rm Rm Rm |
written off1 Rm |
and IIS2 Rm |
movement1, 2 Rm |
ECL Rm |
| 9 396 (382) 144 238 1 067 |
(1 351) | 991 | 27 | 10 130 |
| 1 126 267 115 382 (470) |
(1) | 1 037 | ||
| 2 014 (267) 123 (144) 131 |
17 | 2 018 | ||
| 6 256 (115) (123) (238) 1 406 |
(1 351) | 991 | 11 | 7 075 |
| 3 236 (226) 324 (98) 1 074 |
(1 100) | 142 | 50 | 3 402 |
| 766 238 (12) 226 (227) |
5 | 770 | ||
| 994 (238) (86) (324) 240 1 476 12 86 98 1 061 |
(1 100) | 142 | 38 7 |
948 1 684 |
| 3 179 (176) 109 67 1 187 |
(1 487) | 194 | (6) | 3 067 |
| 698 126 50 176 (231) |
643 | |||
| 821 (126) 17 (109) 266 |
2 | 980 | ||
| 1 660 (50) (17) (67) 1 152 |
(1 487) | 194 | (8) | 1 444 |
| 7 667 (150) 1 241 (1 091) 889 |
(1 275) | 456 | 758 | 8 495 |
| 781 163 (13) 150 (88) |
107 | 950 | ||
| 1 956 (162) (1 078) (1 240) (124) |
449 | 1 041 | ||
| 4 930 12 1 078 1 090 1 101 |
(1 275) | 456 | 202 | 6 504 |
| 125 (47) |
2 | 80 | ||
| 84 (13) |
2 | 73 | ||
| 36 (34) 5 |
2 5 |
|||
| 45 (18) |
36 | 63 | ||
| 45 (14) |
29 | 60 | ||
| (4) | 7 | 3 | ||
| 11 391 (50) 271 (221) 3 085 |
(4 100) | 836 | 236 | 11 448 |
| 2 289 162 (112) 50 (189) |
57 | 2 207 | ||
| 2 454 (162) (109) (271) (85) 6 648 112 109 221 3 359 |
(4 100) | 836 | 54 125 |
2 152 7 089 |
| 35 039 (984) 2 089 (1 105) 7 237 |
(9 313) | 2 619 | 1 103 | 36 685 |
| 5 789 956 28 984 (1 232) 8 275 |
199 | 5 740 | ||
| (955) (1 133) (2 088) 390 (29) 1 133 1 104 8 079 |
(9 313) | 2 619 | 567 337 |
7 144 23 801 |
| 20 975 |
7.3 Expected credit loss reconciliation of loans and advances at amortised cost continued
1 At 31 December 2018 IIS on accounts written off of R1 134 million was previously classified as part of exchange and other movements when it should
The below is an explanation of significant changes in the gross carrying amount on financial instruments used to determine
• The ECL on new exposures raised of R3.7 billion (2018: R3.8 billion) primarily relates to the net growth in the gross carrying
• The decrease in ECL due to impaired accounts written off of R13 billion (2018: R9 billion) resulted in an equal decrease to the gross carrying amount of loans and advances as exposures are 100% provided for before being written off. • The group policy is to transfer using opening ECL balances based on the exposures' ECL stage at the end of the reporting
have been included in the impaired accounts written off line within the note. The comparative has been restated to reflect this change. 2 The disclosure has been disaggregated as part of the amendments to IAS 1 and IAS 8, the disaggregation did not impact the SOFP. The comparative
amount of R2 619 million TVM unwind and IIS is now shown separately.
– Mortgage loans of R45 billion (2018: R44 billion)
– VAF of R37 billion (2018: R38 billion) – Corporate of R171 billion (2018: R12 billion).
the above changes in ECL:
amount of:
period.
Changes in gross exposures relating to changes in ECL
7.3.1 Expected credit loss reconciliation of loans and advances – per product continued
• The significant gross carrying amounts transferred between the stages are as follows for 2019:
| Stage 2 | Stage 3 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross amortised cost before modification Rm |
Net modification loss Rm |
Gross amortised cost before modification Rm |
Net modification loss Rm |
||
| 2019 | |||||
| Mortgage loans | 1 318 | 78 | |||
| Vehicle and asset finance | 81 | 7 | |||
| Card debtors | 247 | 64 | |||
| Other loans and advances | 766 | 122 | |||
| Total | 2 331 | 264 | 81 | 7 | |
| 2018 | |||||
| Mortgage loans | 928 | 58 | 92 | 2 | |
| Vehicle and asset finance | 27 | 4 | |||
| Card debtors | 141 | 40 | 11 | 2 | |
| Corporate | 107 | 6 | 504 | 3 | |
| Other loans and advances | 482 | 25 | 22 | 5 | |
| Total | 1 658 | 129 | 656 | 16 |
R16.2 billion (2018: R15.8 billion) is the gross carrying amount for modifications during the reporting period that resulted in no economic loss (i.e. no net modification gain or loss).
| 2019 | 2018 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Policyholders' assets Rm |
Policyholders' liabilities Rm |
Policyholders' assets Rm |
Policyholders' liabilities Rm |
||
| Policyholders' liabilities under insurance contracts | 7 017 | (216 355) | 6 708 | (211 181) | |
| Insurance contracts (note 8.1) Investment contracts with DPF1 (note 8.1) |
7 017 | (206 103) (10 252) |
6 708 | (200 744) (10 437) |
|
| Policyholders' liabilities under investment contracts (note 8.2) |
(107 891) | (99 813) | |||
| Total | 7 017 | (324 246) | 6 708 | (310 994) |
1 Discretionary participation feature.
| Insurance contracts | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Policyholders' assets Rm |
Policyholders' liabilities Rm |
Reinsurance assets and liabilities Rm |
Investment contracts with DPF1 Rm |
|
| 2019 Balance at the beginning of the year |
6 708 | (200 744) | 1 416 | (10 437) |
| Reinsurance assets Reinsurance liabilities |
1 699 (283) |
|||
| Inflows | (8 771) | (49 907) | 1 798 | (2 794) |
| Insurance premiums Investment returns Fee revenue |
(8 771) | (29 518) (20 370) (19) |
1 795 3 |
(1 756) (1 038) |
| Outflows | 8 590 | 43 354 | (1 760) | 2 979 |
| Claims and policyholders' benefits Acquisition costs associated with insurance contracts General marketing and administration expenses Profit share allocations Finance costs and fair value adjustments on financial |
4 969 1 315 1 846 104 |
32 778 1 723 4 376 1 313 |
(1 824) (3) (47) (5) |
2 757 85 142 |
| liabilities Taxation |
411 (55) |
860 2 304 |
119 | (5) |
| Net income from insurance operations | 490 | 1 169 | 292 | (14) |
| Changes in assumptions Discretionary and compulsory margins and other |
(52) | 99 | 68 | |
| variances New business |
891 (117) |
2 421 (296) |
326 20 |
(21) |
| Shareholder taxation on transfer of net income | (232) | (1 055) | (122) | 7 |
| Exchange differences | 25 | (1) | 14 | |
| Balance at the end of the year | 7 017 | (206 103) | 1 745 | (10 252) |
| Reinsurance assets (note 9) Reinsurance liabilities (note 20) |
1 991 (246) |
|||
| Liquidity profile Current Non-current |
2 357 4 660 |
(21 383) (184 720) |
419 1 326 |
(515) (9 737) |
| Balance at the end of the year | 7 017 | (206 103) | 1 745 | (10 252) |
Refer to footnotes on page 60.
| Insurance contracts | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Policyholders' assets Rm |
Policyholders' liabilities Rm |
Reinsurance assets and liabilities Rm |
Investment contracts with DPF1 Rm |
|
| 2018 Balance at the beginning of the year |
7 484 | (210 554) | 818 | (11 845) |
| Reinsurance assets Reinsurance liabilities |
1 481 (663) |
|||
| Inflows | (8 307) | (30 758) | 1 576 | (2 066) |
| Insurance premiums Investment returns Fee revenue |
(8 307) | (28 477) (2 258) (23) |
1 576 | (1 966) (100) |
| Outflows | 7 170 | 40 366 | (1 244) | 3 731 |
| Claims and policyholders' benefits Acquisition costs associated with insurance contracts General marketing and administration expenses Profit share allocations Finance costs and fair value adjustments on financial liabilities Taxation |
3 792 1 311 1 763 20 407 (123) |
30 995 1 891 4 434 1 185 973 888 |
(1 308) (1) (43) 108 |
3 511 87 144 (11) |
| Net income from insurance operations | 361 | 418 | 262 | (58) |
| Changes in assumptions Discretionary and compulsory margins and other variances New business Shareholder taxation on transfer of net income |
(605) 1 085 29 (148) |
(165) 1 804 (491) (730) |
383 (44) 25 (102) |
(82) 24 |
| Exchange differences | (216) | 4 | (199) | |
| Balance at the end of the year | 6 708 | (200 744) | 1 416 | (10 437) |
| Reinsurance assets (note 9) Reinsurance liabilities (note 20) |
1 699 (283) |
|||
| Liquidity profile Current Non-current |
2 332 4 376 |
(20 762) (179 982) |
353 1 063 |
(226) (10 211) |
| Balance at the end of the year | 6 708 | (200 744) | 1 416 | (10 437) |
1 The group cannot reliably measure the fair value of the investment contracts with DPF. The DPF is a contractual right that gives investors in these contracts the right to receive supplementary discretionary returns through participation in the surplus arising from the assets held in the investment DPF fund. These supplementary returns are subject to the discretion of the group.
| 2019 Rm |
2018 Rm |
|
|---|---|---|
| Balance at the beginning of the year Fund inflows from investment contracts (excluding switches) Net fair value adjustment Fund outflows from investment contracts (excluding switches) Service fee income Exchange differences |
(99 813) (17 969) (9 146) 17 681 1 330 26 |
(100 519) (17 901) 1 273 16 083 1 251 |
| Balance at the end of the year | (107 891) | (99 813) |
| Liquidity profile Current Non-current Balance at the end of the year |
(7 318) (100 573) (107 891) |
(5 262) (94 551) (99 813) |
| Net income from investment contracts1 | (26) | (38) |
| Service fee income Expenses |
(1 330) 1 304 |
(1 251) 1 213 |
| Property expenses applied to investment returns Shareholder taxation on transfer of net income Acquisition costs General marketing and administration expenses Finance costs |
(313) 9 547 1 041 20 |
(377) 14 543 1 014 19 |
1 Prior to deferred acquisition costs (DAC) and deferred revenue liability (DRL) adjustments.
| 2019 Rm |
2018 Rm |
|
|---|---|---|
| Financial assets1 | 19 198 | 12 034 |
| Operating leases – accrued income (note 11) | 875 | 990 |
| Other debtors2 | 768 | 606 |
| Trading settlement assets | 12 339 | 5 432 |
| Accounts receivable2 | 1 559 | 1 085 |
| Investment debtors2 | 158 | 804 |
| Reinsurance assets3 | 2 409 | 2 119 |
| Retirement funds (note 43) | 1 090 | 998 |
| Non-financial assets1 | 10 703 | 10 480 |
| Items in the course of collection | 1 771 | 1 257 |
| Prepayments | 2 985 | 3 434 |
| Properties in possession | 110 | 50 |
| Fleet rental stock | 541 | 9 |
| Deferred acquisition costs | 790 | 777 |
| Insurance prepayments | 4 506 | 4 953 |
| Total | 29 901 | 22 514 |
1 The note disclosure has been disaggregated to provide a better analysis of financial and non-financial other assets as part of the adoption of
the amendments to IAS 1 and IAS 8, this change had no impact on the SOFP.
2 Due to the short-term nature of these assets and historical experience, debtors are regarded as having a low probability of default; therefore ECL is insignificant on these debtors.
3 Reinsurance assets include short-term reinsurance assets of R418 million (2018: R420 million).
| 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|
| Rm | Rm | |
| Equity accounted associates and joint ventures | ||
| Carrying value at the beginning of the year | 10 376 | 9 609 |
| Share of profits | (512) | 912 |
| Impairments of associates and joint ventures | (2 418) | (5) |
| Acquisitions | 255 | 79 |
| Disposals | (1 271) | |
| Disposal group held for sale (note 6) | (1 196) | |
| Share of other comprehensive income movements | 400 | (54) |
| Foreign currency translation reserve | (63) | 94 |
| Other | 463 | (148) |
| Distribution of profit | (211) | (165) |
| Carrying value at the end of the year | 5 423 | 10 376 |
| Cost of investments | 5 937 | 8 149 |
| Share of reserves | 2 692 | 3 015 |
| Cumulative impairment | (3 206) | (788) |
There are no significant restrictions on the ability of associates and joint ventures to transfer funds to the group in the form of cash dividends or in the repayment of loans or advances.
AFS Refer to annexure B for further information.
| 2019 Rm |
2018 Rm |
|
|---|---|---|
| Fair value at the beginning of the year | 33 326 | 32 226 |
| Revaluations net of lease straight-lining | 287 | 493 |
| Additions – capitalised subsequent expenditure and acquisitions | 187 | 719 |
| Disposals | (45) | |
| Transfers from/(to) owner-occupied properties (note 12) | 383 | (70) |
| Exchange movements | (3) | 20 |
| Disposal group assets classified as held for sale | (17) | |
| Fair value at the end of the year | 34 180 | 33 326 |
| Investment property and related operating lease balances comprise the following: | ||
| Investment properties at fair value | 34 180 | 33 326 |
| Operating leases – accrued income (note 9) | 875 | 990 |
| Total investment property | 35 055 | 34 316 |
| Amount recognised in profit or loss | ||
| Rental income earned, excluding straight-lining operating leases | 3 128 | 3 160 |
| Direct operating expenses | 954 | 1 060 |
Most of the investment property comprises shopping malls located in South Africa.
The South African located investment properties were independently valued as at 31 December 2019 by registered professional valuers with the South African Council for the Property Valuers Profession, as well as members of the Institute of Valuers of South Africa. The method of valuation is consistent with that described in the key management assumptions section. The Kenyan and Nigerian located properties were independently valued as at 31 December 2019 by various registered professional valuers in each territory.
AFS Refer to the key management assumptions for details regarding the valuation of investment property.
| Property | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Freehold Rm |
Leasehold1 Rm |
||
| Net book value at 1 January 20181 | 6 956 | 825 | |
| Cost Accumulated depreciation |
8 096 (1 140) |
2 981 (2 156) |
|
| Movement | 904 | 525 | |
| Additions Disposals Depreciation Disposal group held for sale Exchange movements Transfer from investment property (note 11) |
1 193 (88) (159) (112) 70 |
545 (212) (308) 500 |
|
| Net book value at 31 December 2018 | 7 860 | 1 350 | |
| Cost Accumulated depreciation and impairment |
9 192 (1 332) |
3 827 (2 477) |
|
| IFRS 16 transition adjustment3 | |||
| Net book value at 1 January 2019 (restated) Movement |
7 860 (650) |
1 350 (678) |
|
| Additions and modifications4 Disposals and terminations Depreciation Disposal group held for sale (note 6) Exchange and other movements Transfer to investment property (note 11) |
2 819 (1 448) (167) (472) (999) (383) |
158 (30) (276) (530) |
|
| Net book value 31 December 2019 | 7 210 | 672 | |
| Cost Accumulated depreciation and impairment |
8 646 (1 436) |
3 725 (3 053) |
|
1 During the year, the group identified that certain items of office equipment were incorrectly allocated to leasehold improvements. Therefore, the comparative disclosures have been restated to correct the allocation between these classes of property and equipment. This correction has not changed the overall property and equipment balance as disclosed on the face of the statement of financial position. The net book value of leasehold property has been restated from R1 726 million at 31 December 2018 to R1 350 million (2017: from R1 232 million to R825 million), the net book value of office equipment has been restated from R608 million at 31 December 2018 to R984 million (2017: from R575 million to R982 million). and a depreciation charge of R31 million has been reallocated from leasehold property to office equipment for the year ended 31 December 2018.
2 This balance primarily relates to motor vehicles that are leased to third-parties under operating leases. The group is the lessor.
3 The group has, as permitted by IFRS 16, elected not to restate its comparative annual financial statements. Comparability will therefore not be achieved as the comparative annual financial information has been prepared on an IAS 17 basis. Refer to page 29 for more detail on the adoption of IFRS 16.
4 Modifications relate to IFRS 16 ROU assets only.
Property and equipment include work in progress of R1 665 million (2018: R1 897 million) for which depreciation has not yet commenced (refer to note 24.2 for details regarding capital commitments).
The fair value of completed freehold property, based on valuations undertaken for the period 2017 to 2019 was estimated at R9 122 million (2018: R10 786 million). Registers of freehold property are available for inspection by members, or their authorised agents, at the registered office of the company and its subsidiaries. Valuations were generally in terms of the investment method whereby net income is capitalised having regard to tenancy, location and the physical nature of the property.
| Right of use assets | Equipment | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ATM spacing Branches and other Rm Rm |
Buildings Rm |
Motor vehicles2 Rm |
Office equipment1 Rm |
Furniture and fittings Rm |
Computer equipment Rm |
| 16 179 | 247 | 982 | 3 273 | 3 896 | |
| 31 627 (15 448) |
568 (321) |
2 050 (1 068) |
7 013 (3 740) |
10 919 (7 023) |
|
| 3 015 | 1 507 | 2 | (45) | 122 | |
| 6 200 (2 858) |
1 639 (26) (107) (3) 4 |
157 (11) (176) (2) 34 |
790 (49) (639) (7) (140) |
1 876 (376) (1 469) (12) 103 |
|
| 19 194 | 1 754 | 984 | 3 228 | 4 018 | |
| 36 490 (17 296) |
2 129 (375) |
2 196 (1 212) |
7 473 (4 245) |
11 673 (7 655) |
|
| 3 064 329 5 394 |
2 001 | ||||
| 3 064 329 24 588 (730) (42) (2 570) |
2 001 (423) |
1 754 155 |
984 377 |
3 228 (157) |
4 018 (422) |
| 487 138 8 311 (148) (22) (3 686) (919) (151) (4 864) |
575 (126) (727) |
2 191 (1 689) (310) |
106 (65) (135) (347) |
615 (97) (673) |
1 222 (61) (1 506) |
| (150) (7) (1 130) |
(145) | (37) | 818 | (2) | (77) |
| 2 334 287 22 018 |
1 578 | 1 909 | 1 361 | 3 071 | 3 596 |
| 3 199 434 42 100 (865) (147) (20 082) |
2 261 (683) |
2 336 (427) |
2 027 (666) |
7 584 (4 513) |
11 888 (8 292) |
12. Property, equipment and right of use assets
1 During the year, the group identified that certain items of office equipment were incorrectly allocated to leasehold improvements. Therefore, the comparative disclosures have been restated to correct the allocation between these classes of property and equipment. This correction has not changed the overall property and equipment balance as disclosed on the face of the statement of financial position. The net book value of leasehold property has been restated from R1 726 million at 31 December 2018 to R1 350 million (2017: from R1 232 million to R825 million), the net book value of office equipment has been restated from R608 million at 31 December 2018 to R984 million (2017: from R575 million to R982 million). and a depreciation charge of R31 million has been reallocated from leasehold property to office equipment for the year ended 31 December 2018.
3 The group has, as permitted by IFRS 16, elected not to restate its comparative annual financial statements. Comparability will therefore not be achieved as the comparative annual financial information has been prepared on an IAS 17 basis. Refer to page 29 for more detail on the adoption
Property and equipment include work in progress of R1 665 million (2018: R1 897 million) for which depreciation has not yet
The fair value of completed freehold property, based on valuations undertaken for the period 2017 to 2019 was estimated at R9 122 million (2018: R10 786 million). Registers of freehold property are available for inspection by members, or their authorised agents, at the registered office of the company and its subsidiaries. Valuations were generally in terms of the investment method whereby net income is capitalised having regard to tenancy, location and the physical nature
2 This balance primarily relates to motor vehicles that are leased to third-parties under operating leases. The group is the lessor.
of IFRS 16.
of the property.
12.1 Valuation
4 Modifications relate to IFRS 16 ROU assets only.
commenced (refer to note 24.2 for details regarding capital commitments).
| Goodwill Rm |
Computer software Rm |
Present value of in-force life insurance (PVIF) Rm |
Other intangible assets Rm |
Total Rm |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net book value at 1 January 2018 | 1 999 | 21 244 | 31 | 55 | 23 329 |
| Cost Accumulated amortisation and impairment |
3 819 (1 820) |
33 303 (12 059) |
1 453 (1 422) |
877 (822) |
39 452 (16 123) |
| Movements: | 311 | 77 | (7) | (34) | 347 |
| Additions Disposals Amortisation Disposal group held for sale |
(16) | 2 848 (80) (2 486) (85) |
(10) | (8) | 2 848 (96) (2 504) (85) |
| Exchange movements Impairments |
327 | 329 (449) |
3 | (26) | 633 (449) |
| Net book value at 31 December 2018 | 2 310 | 21 321 | 24 | 21 | 23 676 |
| Cost Accumulated amortisation and impairment |
4 285 (1 975) |
36 543 (15 222) |
1 465 (1 441) |
720 (699) |
43 013 (19 337) |
| Movements | (27) | (1 309) | (12) | (5) | (1 353) |
| Additions Disposals Amortisation Disposal group held for sale Exchange movements Impairments |
43 (6) (53) (11) |
2 394 (181) (2 579) (709) (234) |
(12) | (5) | 2 437 (181) (2 596) (6) (762) (245) |
| Net book value at 31 December 2019 Cost Accumulated amortisation and impairment |
2 283 4 256 (1 973) |
20 012 37 607 (17 595) |
12 1 465 (1 453) |
16 720 (704) |
22 323 44 048 (21 725) |
R124 million (2018: R206 million) of borrowing costs was capitalised to computer software. Borrowing costs are capitalised using an average rate of 7.40% (2018: 7.72%).
Intangible assets include work in progress of R3 389 million (2018: R3 123 million) for which amortisation has not yet commenced.
| 2019 | 2018 | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross goodwill Rm |
Accumulated impairment Rm |
Net goodwill Rm |
Gross goodwill Rm |
Accumulated impairment Rm |
Net goodwill Rm |
|
| Stanbic IBTC Holdings PLC Stanbic Holdings PLC |
2 070 | (1 092) | 978 | 2 126 | (1 121) | 1 005 |
| (Kenya) | 1 025 | 1 025 | 1 047 | 1 047 | ||
| Other | 1 161 | (881) | 280 | 1 112 | (854) | 258 |
| Total | 4 256 | (1 973) | 2 283 | 4 285 | (1 975) | 2 310 |
Based on the impairment test performed, no impairment was recognised for 2019 or 2018.
Based on the impairment test performed, no impairment was recognised for 2019 or 2018.
The remaining aggregated carrying amount of the goodwill of R280 million (2018: R258 million) has been allocated to CGUs that are not considered to be individually significant. Based on the impairment testing performed, R11 million (2018: Rnil) impairment was recognised for 2019 on these CGUs.
| 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|
| Rm | Rm | |
| Accrued interest receivable | 54 | 37 |
| Assessed losses1 | (413) | (243) |
| Leased assets included in loans and advances | 84 | 121 |
| Capital gains tax | 990 | 352 |
| Credit impairment charges | (3 820) | (3 990) |
| Deferred acquisition costs | 1 | |
| Deferred revenue liability | (3) | |
| Property, equipment and right of use assets2 | 2 842 | 3 096 |
| Derivatives and financial instruments | (1) | 57 |
| Fair value adjustments on financial instruments | 372 | 196 |
| Intangible asset – PVIF | (6) | (4) |
| Policyholder change in valuation basis | 1 897 | 2 355 |
| Post-employment benefits | 105 | 55 |
| Share-based payments | (955) | (1 169) |
| Special transfer to life fund | (842) | (1 020) |
| Provisions and other items | (942) | (932) |
| Deferred tax closing balance | (635) | (1 091) |
| Deferred tax liabilities | 3 666 | 2 827 |
| Deferred tax assets | (4 301) | (3 918) |
1 The group has estimated tax losses of R1 381 million (2018: R799 million) which are available for set-off against future taxable income. These tax losses have arisen from the group entities incurring operational tax losses. This asset is anticipated to be recovered as financial projections indicate these entities are likely to produce sufficient taxable income in the near future. These deferred tax asset balances were offset against deferred tax liabilities, refer to annexure F detailed accounting policies.
2 The group has, as permitted by IFRS 16, elected not to restate its comparative annual financial statements. Comparability will therefore not be achieved as the comparative annual financial information has been prepared on an IAS 17 basis. Refer to page 29 for more detail on the adoption of IFRS 16.
| 2019 Rm |
2018 Rm |
|
|---|---|---|
| Deferred tax at the beginning of the year | (1 091) | 2 010 |
| IFRS 9 transition adjustment | (2 401) | |
| IFRS 16 transition adjustment1 | 72 | |
| Total temporary differences for the year | 384 | (700) |
| Accrued interest receivable | 17 | 1 |
| Assessed losses | (170) | (165) |
| Leased assets included in loans and advances | (37) | (59) |
| Capital gains tax | 638 | (782) |
| Credit impairment charges | 170 | (183) |
| Deferred acquisition costs | (1) | (204) |
| Deferred revenue liability | 3 | 77 |
| Property, equipment and right of use assets1 | (254) | 350 |
| Derivatives and financial instruments | (58) | (221) |
| Fair value adjustments on financial instruments | 176 | 328 |
| Intangible asset – PVIF | (2) | (14) |
| Policyholder change in valuation basis | (458) | (178) |
| Post-employment benefits | 50 | (13) |
| Share-based payments | 214 | 142 |
| Special transfer to life fund | 178 | (38) |
| Provisions and other items | (82) | 259 |
| Deferred tax at the end of the year | (635) | (1 091) |
| Recognised in OCI | 114 | (97) |
| Fair value adjustments on financial instruments | 68 | (69) |
| Defined benefit fund remeasurements | 52 | (30) |
| Other | (6) | 2 |
| Recognised in equity-deferred tax on share-based payments | 30 | 128 |
| Recognised in retained earnings – IFRS 9 transition adjustment | (2 401) | |
| Recognised in retained earnings – IFRS 16 transition adjustment | 72 | |
| Recognised in the income statement | 119 | (618) |
| Exchange differences | 121 | (113) |
| Recognised in OCI | (4) | 10 |
| Recognised in the income statement | 125 | (123) |
| Total temporary differences | 456 | (3 101) |
1 The group has, as permitted by IFRS 16, elected not to restate its comparative annual financial statements. Comparability will therefore not be achieved as the comparative annual financial information has been prepared on an IAS 17 basis. Refer to page 29 for more detail on the adoption of IFRS 16.
| 2019 Rm |
2018 Rm |
|
|---|---|---|
| 2 billion ordinary shares (2018: 2 billion)1 | 200 | 200 |
| 8 million first preference shares (2018: 8 million)2 | 8 | 8 |
| 1 billion second preference shares(2018: 1 billion)3 | 10 | 10 |
| Total | 218 | 218 |
1 Ordinary shares comprise shares of 10 cents each traded on the JSE under the symbol SBK.
2 First preference shares comprise 6.5% first cumulative preference shares of R1 each traded on the JSE under the symbol SBKP.
3 Second preference shares comprise non-redeemable, non-cumulative, non-participating preference shares of 1 cent each traded on the JSE under the symbol SBPP. The non-redeemable, non-cumulative, non-participating preference shares are entitled to an annual dividend, if declared, payable in two semi-annual instalments of not less than 77% of the prime interest rate multiplied by the subscription price of R100 per share.
| 2019 Rm |
2018 Rm |
|
|---|---|---|
| Ordinary shares | 17 984 | 17 860 |
| Ordinary share capital Ordinary share premium |
162 17 822 |
162 17 698 |
| Other equity instruments attributable to owners of parent | 10 989 | 9 047 |
| First preference share capital Second preference share capital Second preference share premium Additional tier 1 capital (note 15.8) |
8 1 5 494 5 486 |
8 1 5 494 3 544 |
| Total | 28 973 | 26 907 |
Holders of ordinary share capital hold one vote per ordinary share at the group's annual general meeting (AGM).
First preference shareholders and second preference shareholders are not entitled to voting rights unless:
In the event that a resolution is tabled at the AGM to authorise, if circumstances are correct, the repurchase of second preference shares, the shareholders will be permitted to vote on the resolution at the AGM. In terms of paragraph 8.3.9 of the memorandum of incorporation, at this meeting the preference shareholders will be entitled to the portion of the total votes which the aggregate amount of the nominal value of the shares held bears to the aggregate amount of the nominal value of all the shares held.
Additional tier 1 capital holders have no voting rights.
| Number of ordinary shares |
|
|---|---|
| Reconciliation of shares issued Shares in issue at 1 January 2018 Shares issued during 2018 in terms of the group's equity compensation plans Share buy-back |
1 619 268 169 1 729 572 (2 483 523) |
| Shares in issue at 31 December 2018 | 1 618 514 218 |
| Net shares held in terms of the group's Tutuwa initiative Treasury shares held by entities within the group Shares held by other shareholders |
2 985 513 25 310 447 1 590 218 258 |
| Shares issued during 2019 in terms of the group's equity compensation plans | 1 195 330 |
| Shares in issue at 31 December 2019 | 1 619 709 548 |
| Treasury shares held by entities within the group Shares held by other shareholders |
25 637 095 1 594 072 453 |
All issued shares are fully paid up. There has been no movement in the first and second preference shares during the year. The number of shares in issue for first and second preference shares are 8 000 000 and 52 982 248 respectively.
| 2019 Number of shares |
2018 Number of shares |
|
|---|---|---|
| Ordinary unissued shares Ordinary shares reserved to meet the requirements of EGS and GSIS1 |
257 354 962 122 935 490 |
257 354 962 124 130 820 |
| Ordinary shares reserved in terms of the rules of EGS and GSIS as approved by members' resolution dated 27 May 2010 Less: issued to date of the above resolution for the EGS and GSIS |
155 825 715 (32 890 225) |
155 825 715 (31 694 895) |
| Unissued ordinary shares | 380 290 452 | 381 485 782 |
| Unissued second preference shares | 947 017 752 | 947 017 752 |
1 During the year, 1 195 330 (2018: 1 729 572) ordinary shares were issued in terms of the group's equity compensation plans, notably the Equity Growth Scheme (EGS) and Group Share Incentive Scheme (GSIS). No surplus capital was used to purchase ordinary shares in 2019 (2018: 2 483 523) ordinary shares to counteract the dilutive impact of the shares issues under the equity compensation plans. Effective from 2017, the group no longer issues EGS and GSIS awards. The last awards in GSIS were issued in 2011 and for the EGS, the last award was made in 2016. Awards are now provided in terms of the group's other share schemes, notably the Deferred Bonus Scheme and the Share Appreciation Rights Plan, both of which are settled by the group to employees with shares that the group purchases from external market participants, and the Cash-Settled Deferred Bonus Scheme, which is settled in cash (refer to annexure D – Group share incentive schemes for further information). At the end of the year, the group would need to issue 1 485 507 (2018: 2 847 244), SBG ordinary shares to settle the outstanding GSIS options and EGS rights that were awarded to participants in previous years. The shares issued to date for the EGS and GSIS together with the expected number of shares to settle the outstanding options and rights as a percentage of the total number of shares in issue is 2.1% (2018: 2.1%).
| Direct beneficial1 | Indirect beneficial1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 Number of shares |
2018 Number of shares |
2019 Number of shares |
2018 Number of shares |
|
| Ordinary shares | 927 630 | 791 882 | 219 358 | 708 532 |
| A Daehnke | 133 291 | 83 098 | 104 683 | 58 407 |
| GJ Fraser-Moleketi TS Gcabashe2 |
1 890 40 000 |
1 890 | 14 675 | 14 675 50 000 |
| BJ Kruger3 | 312 040 | |||
| JH Maree KD Moroka2 |
163 109 67 151 |
97 847 515 |
66 636 | |
| ANA Peterside CON | 100 000 | 100 000 | ||
| MJD Ruck SK Tshabalala |
25 000 497 189 |
50 000 246 492 |
418 814 | |
| Second preference shares | 10 331 | 37 122 | 3 034 | 3 034 |
| BJ Kruger3 JH Maree4 |
10 331 | 26 791 10 331 |
3 034 | 3 034 |
1 As per JSE Listings Requirements.
2 Includes an allocation of 125 000 shares in terms of the Tutuwa management trust.
3 Retired as director on 31 December 2018, 2018 balances reflected are as at this date.
4 Shares held by directors under share incentive schemes 929 873 (2018: 1 838 963).
There have been no changes to directors' interests in the group's share capital between 1 January 2020 and 5 March 2020.
| 2019 Number of shares |
2018 Number of shares |
|
|---|---|---|
| Ordinary shares | 40 462 856 | 40 481 704 |
| Second preference shares | 947 017 752 | 947 017 752 |
1 The general authority expires at the annual general meeting on 28 May 2020.
| 2019 Number of shares |
2018 Number of shares |
|
|---|---|---|
| Purchased during the year1 Total treasury shares held at the end of year2 Ordinary shares delisted and reinstated to authorised3 |
35 372 939 25 637 095 |
51 954 293 25 310 447 2 483 523 |
1 Total number of ordinary shares purchased during the year by the group's banking activities to facilitate client trading activities and by the group's insurance activities for the benefit of policyholders, as well as share buy-backs to mitigate the dilutive impact as a result of the group's share incentive schemes.
2 Total number of ordinary shares held at the end of the period by the group's banking and insurance activities in terms of the transactions mentioned above.
3 Total number of ordinary shares purchased to mitigate the dilutive impact as a result of the group's share incentive schemes and reinstated to authorised share capital.
| 2019 | 2018 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Number of shares (million) |
% holding |
Number of shares (million) |
% holding |
|
| Public1, 4 Non-public1 |
1 061.9 557.8 |
65.6 34.4 |
1 072.9 545.6 |
66.3 33.7 |
| Directors and prescribed officers of Standard Bank Group, and its subsidiaries2 ICBC Government Employees Pension Fund (investment managed by PIC) |
1.2 325.0 215.0 |
0.1 20.0 13.3 |
1.2 325.0 199.7 |
0.1 20.1 12.4 |
| Standard Bank Group retirement funds Tutuwa participants3, 4 Associates of directors |
2.3 14.1 0.2 |
0.1 0.9 |
2.1 16.9 0.70 |
0.1 1.0 |
| Total | 1 619.7 | 100.0 | 1 618.5 | 100.0 |
| 2019 | 2018 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Number of shares (million) |
% holding |
Number of shares (million) |
% holding |
|
| Public1 | 8 000 000 | 100.0 | 8 000 000 | 100.0 |
| Spread of second preference shareholders | 52 982 248 | 52 982 248 | ||
| Public1 | 52 968 883 | 100.0 | 52 905 909 | 99.9 |
| Non-public1 | 13 365 | 76 339 | 0.1 | |
| Directors and prescribed officers of Standard Bank Group, and its subsidiaries2 |
13 365 | 76 339 | 0.1 | |
| Total | 52 982 248 | 100.0 | 52 982 248 | 100.0 |
1 As per the JSE Listings Requirements.
2 Excludes indirect holdings of strategic partners, which are included in Tutuwa participants.
3 Includes Tutuwa Strategic Holdings 1 and 2, Tutuwa Staff Holdings 1, 2 and 3, Tutuwa Community and General Staff Share Trust.
4 During 2018, there were 4.1 million shares related to Tutuwa participants included in public shareholders. The comparative has been restated for this change.
| Notional value |
Carrying value |
Carrying value |
|||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bond | Date issued | First callable date | 2019 Rm |
2019 Rm |
2018 Rm |
| SBT101 SBT102 SBT103 |
30 March 2017 21 September 2017 20 February 2019 |
31 March 2022 30 September 2022 31 March 2024 |
1 744 1 800 1 942 |
1 744 1 800 1 942 |
1 744 1 800 |
| Total | 5 486 | 5 486 | 3 544 |
During 2019, the group issued an additional Basel III compliant AT1 capital bond amounting to R1.9 billion (2018: Rnil). The capital notes are perpetual, non-cumulative with an issuer call option after a minimum period of five years and one day and on every coupon payment date thereafter.
Coupons to the value of R636 million (2018: R447 million) were paid to AT1 capital bond holders. Current tax of R178 million (2018: R125 million) relating to the AT1 capital bonds was recognised directly in equity resulting in an aggregate net equity impact of R458 million (2018: R322 million).
The terms of the Basel III compliant AT1 capital bonds include a regulatory requirement which provides for the write-off, in whole or in part, on the earlier of a decision by the SARB that a write-off without which the issuer would have become non-viable is necessary, or a decision to make a public sector injection of capital or equivalent support, without which the issuer would have become non-viable.
The AT1 capital bonds do not have a contractual obligation to pay cash; hence, they have been recognised within equity attributable to other equity instrument holders on the statement of financial position.
Holders of AT1 capital do not have voting rights at the group's annual general meeting.
SBG and Liberty entered into a series of transactions in 2004 whereby investments were made in cumulative redeemable preference shares issued by Black Economic Empowerment (BEE) entities which are Structured Entities (SEs). The initial investments made by SBG and Liberty totalled R4 017 million and R1 251 million respectively. The proceeds received were used by the BEE entities to purchase 99 190 197 ordinary shares of SBG. All participants were subject to a ten-year lock-in period which expired on 31 December 2014.
Since the end of the lock-in period, Tutuwa beneficiaries have been able to exit the scheme and this has seen a progressive reduction in the value of the group's investment in these preference shares. All remaining preference shares in the Tutuwa entities were redeemed prior to the final redemption date of 4 October 2019, thus leaving the only shares in the BEE entities within the Liberty group.
The preference shares owned by the group do not meet the definition of a financial asset in terms of IFRS and are therefore treated as a negative empowerment reserve within the statement of changes in equity. The empowerment reserve represents SBG and Liberty shares held by the SEs that are deemed to be treasury shares in terms of IFRS.
The investment in the cumulative redeemable preference shares of the BEE entities, accounted for by the group as a negative empowerment reserve, is set out below:
| 2019 Rm |
2018 Rm |
|
|---|---|---|
| Standard Bank Group1 Liberty (after non-controlling interest) |
69 | 148 53 |
| Outstanding shares issued | 69 | 201 |
| Number of SBG shares | 2 985 513 |
1 2018 comprises the Black Managers' Trust – Tutuwa Staff Holdings 1 – 3 Proprietary Limited and the Community Trust – Tutuwa Community Holdings Proprietary Limited.
For the purposes of the earnings per share calculation, the weighted average number of the company's shares in issue is reduced by the number of shares held by the BEE entities bought with the proceeds received from the preference shares (note 39).
AFS Refer to annexure F for further details relating to
the accounting policies applied.
| 2019 Rm |
2018 Rm |
|
|---|---|---|
| Collateral | 2 472 | 730 |
| Credit-linked notes | 13 073 | 10 090 |
| Government, municipality and utility bonds | 10 775 | 19 520 |
| Listed equities | 33 215 | 23 334 |
| Repurchase and other collateralised agreements | 11 735 | 1 190 |
| Other instruments | 12 577 | 5 083 |
| Total | 83 847 | 59 947 |
| 2019 Rm |
2018 Rm |
|
|---|---|---|
| Deposits and debt funding from banks Deposits and debt funding from customers |
121 119 1 305 074 |
116 727 1 240 810 |
| Current accounts | 240 246 | 248 841 |
| Cash management deposits | 175 847 | 171 408 |
| Call deposits | 355 172 | 359 305 |
| Savings accounts | 29 913 | 28 750 |
| Term deposits | 287 536 | 251 709 |
| Negotiable certificates of deposit | 148 997 | 125 428 |
| Foreign currency funding | 57 279 | 47 165 |
| Other funding | 10 084 | 8 204 |
| Total | 1 426 193 | 1 357 537 |
| Notional value1 |
Carrying value1 |
Carrying value |
|||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redeemable/ | 2019 | 2018 | |||
| repayable date | First callable date | Million | Rm | Rm | |
| Subordinated bonds | |||||
| Standard Bank Group Limited | 11 843 | 5 057 | |||
| SBT201 | 13 February 2028 | 13 February 2023 | ZAR3 000 | 3 040 | 3 041 |
| SBT202 | 3 December 2028 | 3 December 2023 | ZAR1 516 | 1 527 | 1 528 |
| SBT203 | 3 December 2028 | 3 December 2023 | ZAR484 | 506 | 488 |
| SBT204 | 16 April 2029 | 16 April 2024 | ZAR1 000 | 1 019 | |
| SBT205 | 31 May 2029 | 31 May 2024 | USD400 | 5 751 | |
| The Standard Bank of South Africa | 8 975 | 13 793 | |||
| SBK17 | 30 July 2024 | 30 July 2019 | ZAR2 000 | 2 032 | |
| SBK19 | 24 October 2024 | 24 October 2019 | ZAR500 | 509 | |
| SBK202 | 2 December 2024 | 2 December 2019 | ZAR2 250 | 2 269 | |
| SBK212 | 28 January 2025 | 28 January 2020 | ZAR750 | 763 | 764 |
| SBK222 SBK242 |
28 May 2025 | 28 May 2020 | ZAR1 000 | 1 010 | 1 010 |
| SBK18 | 19 October 2025 24 October 2025 |
19 October 2020 24 October 2020 |
ZAR880 ZAR3 500 |
886 3 560 |
899 3 563 |
| SBK262 | 25 April 2026 | 25 April 2021 | ZAR500 | 521 | 511 |
| SBK252 | 25 April 2026 | 25 April 2021 | ZAR1 200 | 1 218 | 1 225 |
| SBK232 | 28 May 2027 | 28 May 2022 | ZAR1 000 | 1 017 | 1 011 |
| Subordinated bonds issued to group companies | (86) | (122) | |||
| Total bonds qualifying as SARB regulatory banking capital Africa Regions' bonds not qualifying as SARB regulatory |
20 732 | 18 728 | |||
| banking capital | 2 501 | 1 969 | |||
| Stanbic Bank Kenya | 8 December 2021 | 1 June 2020 | KES4 000 | 557 | 564 |
| Stanbic Bank Kenya Stanbic IBTC Bank |
1 January 2029 | 1 January 2024 | USD20 | 282 | |
| (Nigeria) | 30 September 2024 | 30 March 2020 | NGN15 440 | 618 | 633 |
| Standard Bank | September 2025 – | August 2020 – | |||
| Mozambique | October 2025 | October 2020 | MZN1 001 | 237 | 250 |
| Other Africa Regions' | October 2024 – | April 2020 – | |||
| bonds | October 2027 | October 2024 | Various | 807 | 522 |
| Total subordinated bonds – banking activities | 23 233 | 20 697 | |||
| Liberty Qualifying as regulatory insurance capital |
5 668 | 5 662 | |||
| LGL 04 | 14 August 2020 | ZAR1 000 | 1 046 | 1 063 | |
| LGL 05 | 12 December 2021 | ZAR500 | 513 | 508 | |
| LGL 06 | 4 October 2022 | ZAR400 | 423 | 414 | |
| LGL 07 | 4 October 2022 | ZAR600 | 612 | 605 | |
| LGL 08 | 28 February 2023 | ZAR900 | 931 | 929 | |
| LGL 09 | 28 February 2024 | ZAR1 100 | 1 143 | 1 143 | |
| LGL 10 | 8 October 2025 | ZAR1 000 | 1 000 | 1 000 | |
| Total | 28 901 | 26 359 | |||
1 The difference between the carrying and notional value represents foreign exchange movements, transaction costs included in the initial carrying
amounts, accrued interest and the unamortised fair value adjustments relating to bonds, where applicable, hedged for interest rate risk. 2 The terms of the issued bonds include a regulatory requirement which provides for the write-off in whole or in part on the earlier of a decision
by the relevant regulator (SARB) that a write-off, or a public sector injection of capital or equivalent support is necessary, without which the issuer would have become non-viable.
| 2019 Rm |
2018 Rm |
|
|---|---|---|
| Financial liabilities1 | 94 477 | 79 724 |
| Cash-settled share-based payment liability (annexure D) | 452 | 748 |
| Expected credit loss for off-balance sheet exposure (note 20.4) | 360 | 588 |
| Collateral and other insurance risk management liabilities | 12 474 | 11 747 |
| Deferred revenue liability | 330 | 314 |
| Third-party liabilities arising on consolidation of mutual funds (note 20.2) | 56 758 | 48 186 |
| Reinsurance liabilities (note 8.1) | 246 | 283 |
| Insurance payables | 10 591 | 9 407 |
| Lease liability2 (note 20.3) | 4 055 | |
| Short-term insurance liability | 991 | 984 |
| Trading settlement liabilities | 8 220 | 7 467 |
| Non-financial liabilities1 | 29 624 | 30 029 |
| Items in the course of transmission | 4 784 | 4 385 |
| Post-employment benefits (note 43) | 1 113 | 1 228 |
| Staff-related accruals | 11 963 | 11 135 |
| Other non-financial liabilities | 11 764 | 13 281 |
| Total | 124 101 | 109 753 |
1 The note disclosure has been disaggregated to show a better analysis of financial and non-financial provisions and other liabilities as part of the adoption of the amendments to IAS 1 and IAS 8, this change had no impact on the SOFP.
2 The group has, as permitted by IFRS 16, elected not to restate its comparative annual financial statements. Comparability will therefore not be achieved as the comparative annual financial information has been prepared on an IAS 17 basis. Refer to page 29 for more detail on the adoption of IFRS 16.
| 2019 Rm |
2018 Rm |
|
|---|---|---|
| Balance at the beginning of the year | 48 186 | 49 713 |
| Additional mutual funds classified as subsidiaries | 5 741 | 5 853 |
| Distributions | (1 712) | (1 189) |
| Fair value adjustments | 6 327 | 2 407 |
| Mutual funds no longer classified as subsidiaries | (513) | (4 236) |
| Net capital repayment or change in effective ownership | (1 271) | (4 362) |
| Balance at the end of the year | 56 758 | 48 186 |
The group has classified certain mutual funds as investments in subsidiaries. Consequently, fund interest not held by the group are classified by the group as third-party liabilities as they represent demand deposit liabilities measured at fair value.
| Balance at 1 January 2019 Rm |
Additions/ modification Rm |
Term inations and/or cancellations Rm |
Interest expense1 Rm |
Payments2 Rm |
Exchange and other movements Rm |
Balance at 31 December 2019 Rm |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Buildings Branches ATM spacing |
1 887 2 745 |
437 412 |
(44) (152) |
130 207 |
(667) (1 288) |
(101) 207 |
1 642 2 131 |
| and other | 322 | 107 | (21) | 24 | (140) | (10) | 282 |
| Total | 4 954 | 956 | (217) | 361 | (2 095) | 96 | 4 055 |
1 As at 31 December 2019, R339 million of this interest expense was included in income from banking activities and R22 million was included
in operating expenses in investment management and life insurance activities.
2 These amounts include the principal lease payments as disclosed in the statements of cash flows of R1734 million. The remainder represents interest expense paid during the year.
| Opening balance Rm |
Net ECL raised/ (released) Rm |
Exchange and other movements Rm |
Closing balance Rm |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Letters of credit, bank acceptances and guarantees 2019 |
||||
| Stage 1 | 158 | 25 | (14) | 169 |
| Stage 2 | 58 | 11 | 0 | 69 |
| Stage 3 | 372 | (234) | (16) | 122 |
| Total | 588 | (198) | (30) | 360 |
| 2018 | ||||
| Stage 1 | 154 | 15 | (11) | 158 |
| Stage 2 | 71 | (11) | (2) | 58 |
| Stage 3 | 198 | 173 | 1 | 372 |
| Total | 423 | 177 | (12) | 588 |
All financial assets and liabilities have been classified according to their measurement category with disclosure of the fair value being provided for those items.
| Fair value through profit or loss | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Held-for trading Rm |
Designated Rm |
Default Rm |
||
| 2019 | ||||
| Assets | ||||
| Cash and balances with central banks | 65 650 | |||
| Derivative assets | 71 407 | |||
| Trading assets | 222 802 | |||
| Pledged assets | 11 629 | 11 577 | ||
| Financial investments | 24 028 | 344 484 | ||
| Loans and advances | 161 | |||
| Policyholders' assets | ||||
| Interest in associates and joint ventures | ||||
| Investment property | ||||
| Disposal group assets held for sale | 261 | |||
| Other financial assets3 | ||||
| Other non-financial assets | ||||
| Total assets | 305 838 | 24 028 | 422 133 | |
| Liabilities | ||||
| Derivative liabilities | 69 498 | |||
| Trading liabilities | 83 847 | |||
| Deposits and debt funding | 5 646 | |||
| Policyholders' liabilities4 | 107 891 | |||
| Subordinated debt | 5 668 | |||
| Disposal group liabilities held for sale | ||||
| Other financial liabilities3 | 74 985 | |||
| Other non-financial liabilities | ||||
| Total liabilities | 153 345 | 194 190 |
Fair value2 Rm
1 Includes financial assets and financial liabilities for which the carrying value has been adjusted for changes in fair value due to designated hedged risks.
2 Carrying value has been used where it closely approximates fair values, excluding non-financial assets and liabilities.
3 The fair value of other financial assets and liabilities measured at amortised cost approximates the carrying value due to their short-term nature. 4 The fair value has been provided for financial liabilities under investment contracts which have been designated at fair value. The remaining liabilities for which fair value disclosure has not been provided relate to insurance contracts and investment contracts with discretionary participation features that are not financial instruments as defined.
| Other non |
Fair value through other comprehensive income |
|||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fair value2 Rm |
Total carrying amount Rm |
financial assets/ liabilities Rm |
Amortised cost1 Rm |
Total fair value Rm |
Equity instruments Rm |
Debt instruments Rm |
| 75 289 | 75 288 | 9 638 | 65 650 | |||
| 71 407 | 71 407 | 71 407 | ||||
| 222 802 | 222 802 | 222 802 | ||||
| 29 378 | 29 377 | 662 | 28 715 | 5 509 | ||
| 567 355 1 182 663 |
567 319 1 181 067 |
153 760 1 180 906 |
413 559 161 |
1 284 | 43 763 | |
| 7 017 | 7 017 | |||||
| 5 423 | 5 423 | |||||
| 34 180 | 34 180 | 34 180 | ||||
| 261 | 2 599 | 2 338 | 261 | |||
| 19 198 | 19 198 | |||||
| 59 912 | 59 912 | |||||
| 2 275 589 | 108 870 | 1 364 164 | 802 555 | 1 284 | 49 272 | |
| 69 498 | 69 498 | 69 498 | ||||
| 83 847 | 83 847 | 83 847 | ||||
| 1 426 651 | 1 426 193 | 1 420 547 | 5 646 | |||
| 107 891 | 324 246 | 216 355 | 107 891 | |||
| 29 263 | 28 901 | 23 233 | 5 668 | |||
| 246 | 246 | |||||
| 94 477 38 697 |
38 697 | 19 492 | 74 985 | |||
| 2 066 105 | 255 298 | 1 463 272 | 347 535 |
20. Provisions and other liabilities continued
Letters of credit, bank acceptances and guarantees
21. Classification of assets and liabilities
being provided for those items.
2019
2018
that are not financial instruments as defined.
20.4 Reconciliation of expected credit losses for off-balance sheet exposures
Accounting classifications and fair values of assets and liabilities
Opening balance Rm
Stage 1 158 25 (14) 169 Stage 2 58 11 0 69 Stage 3 372 (234) (16) 122 Total 588 (198) (30) 360
Stage 1 154 15 (11) 158 Stage 2 71 (11) (2) 58 Stage 3 198 173 1 372 Total 423 177 (12) 588
All financial assets and liabilities have been classified according to their measurement category with disclosure of the fair value
1 Includes financial assets and financial liabilities for which the carrying value has been adjusted for changes in fair value due to designated hedged risks.
3 The fair value of other financial assets and liabilities measured at amortised cost approximates the carrying value due to their short-term nature. 4 The fair value has been provided for financial liabilities under investment contracts which have been designated at fair value. The remaining liabilities for which fair value disclosure has not been provided relate to insurance contracts and investment contracts with discretionary participation features
2 Carrying value has been used where it closely approximates fair values, excluding non-financial assets and liabilities.
Net ECL raised/ (released) Rm
Exchange and other movements Rm
Closing balance Rm
All financial assets and liabilities have been classified according to their measurement category with disclosure of the fair value being provided for those items.
| Fair value through profit or loss | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Held for-trading Rm |
Designated Rm |
Fair value through profit or loss – default Rm |
||
| 2018 | ||||
| Assets | ||||
| Cash and balances with central banks | 76 095 | |||
| Derivative assets | 51 678 | |||
| Trading assets | 181 112 | |||
| Pledged assets | 6 266 | 12 661 | ||
| Financial investments5 | 19 740 | 330 304 | ||
| Loans and advances5 | 1 204 | |||
| Policyholders' assets | ||||
| Interest in associates and joint ventures | ||||
| Investment property | ||||
| Disposal group assets held for sale | 265 | |||
| Other financial assets3 | ||||
| Other non-financial assets | ||||
| Total assets | 239 056 | 19 740 | 420 529 | |
| Liabilities | ||||
| Derivative liabilities | 55 057 | |||
| Trading liabilities | 59 947 | |||
| Deposits and debt funding | 6 439 | |||
| Policyholders' liabilities4 | 99 813 | |||
| Subordinated debt | 5 540 | |||
| Disposal group liabilities held for sale | ||||
| Other financial liabilities3 | 67 822 | |||
| Other non-financial liabilities | ||||
| Total liabilities | 115 004 | 179 614 |
Fair value2 Rm
1 Includes financial assets and financial liabilities for which the carrying value has been adjusted for changes in fair value due to designated hedged risks.
2 Carrying value has been used where it closely approximates fair values, excluding non-financial assets and liabilities. 3 The fair value of the other financial assets and liabilities approximates the carrying value due to their short-term nature. Other financial liabilities of R8 628 million and other financial assets of R1 590 million were erroneously classified as other liabilities and other assets respectively, rather
than at designated at fair value and prior year disclosure has been updated. This has no impact on the group's statement of financial position. 4 The fair value has been provided for financial liabilities under investment contracts which have been designated at fair value. The remaining liabilities for which fair value disclosure has not been provided relate to insurance contracts and investment contracts with discretionary participation features
that are not financial instruments as defined. 5 Restated. Refer to page 31 for further details on the restatements.
| Other | Fair value through other comprehensive income |
|||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fair value2 Rm |
Total carrying amount Rm |
non financial assets/ liabilities Rm |
Amortised cost1 Rm |
Total fair value Rm |
Equity instruments Rm |
Debt instruments Rm |
| 85 145 51 678 181 112 19 863 548 578 1 123 115 33 326 265 |
85 145 51 678 181 112 19 879 548 526 1 119 547 6 708 10 376 33 326 762 12 034 |
6 708 10 376 33 326 497 |
9 050 689 144 145 1 118 343 12 034 |
76 095 51 678 181 112 19 190 404 381 1 204 265 |
1 254 | 263 53 083 |
| 57 869 | 57 869 | |||||
| 2 126 962 | 108 776 | 1 284 261 | 733 925 | 1 254 | 53 346 | |
| 55 057 59 947 1 358 058 99 813 25 431 |
55 057 59 947 1 357 537 310 994 26 359 237 79 724 38 044 |
211 181 237 38 044 |
1 351 098 20 819 11 902 |
55 057 59 947 6 439 99 813 5 540 67 822 |
||
| 1 927 899 | 249 462 | 1 383 819 | 294 618 |
21. Classification of assets and liabilities continued
being provided for those items.
that are not financial instruments as defined.
5 Restated. Refer to page 31 for further details on the restatements.
Accounting classifications and fair values of assets and liabilities continued
All financial assets and liabilities have been classified according to their measurement category with disclosure of the fair value
1 Includes financial assets and financial liabilities for which the carrying value has been adjusted for changes in fair value due to designated hedged risks.
3 The fair value of the other financial assets and liabilities approximates the carrying value due to their short-term nature. Other financial liabilities of R8 628 million and other financial assets of R1 590 million were erroneously classified as other liabilities and other assets respectively, rather than at designated at fair value and prior year disclosure has been updated. This has no impact on the group's statement of financial position. 4 The fair value has been provided for financial liabilities under investment contracts which have been designated at fair value. The remaining liabilities for which fair value disclosure has not been provided relate to insurance contracts and investment contracts with discretionary participation features
2 Carrying value has been used where it closely approximates fair values, excluding non-financial assets and liabilities.
| 2019 | 2018 | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Level 1 Rm |
Level 2 Rm |
Level 3 Rm |
Total Rm |
Level 1 Rm |
Level 2 Rm |
Level 3 Rm |
Total Rm |
|
| Assets | ||||||||
| Cash and balances with central bank Derivative assets Trading assets Pledged assets |
60 079 143 134 506 28 612 |
5 571 68 653 85 674 103 |
2 611 2 622 |
65 650 71 407 222 802 28 715 |
64 680 42 97 350 18 272 |
11 415 48 227 81 395 918 |
3 409 2 367 |
76 095 51 678 181 112 19 190 |
| Financial investments3 Loans and advances2 Investment property Disposal group assets classified as held for sale2 |
216 360 261 |
186 535 | 10 664 161 34 180 |
413 559 161 34 180 261 |
203 695 265 |
189 780 1 204 |
10 906 33 326 |
404 381 1 204 33 326 265 |
| Total assets at fair value |
439 961 | 346 536 | 50 238 | 836 735 | 384 304 | 332 939 | 50 008 | 767 251 |
| Liabilities Derivative liabilities Trading liabilities Deposits and debt funding Policyholders' liabilities Other financial liabilities Subordinated debt |
42 45 016 |
63 854 35 632 5 646 107 891 67 692 5 668 |
5 602 3 199 7 293 |
69 498 83 847 5 646 107 891 74 985 5 668 |
52 41 753 |
48 854 15 437 6 439 99 813 61 636 5 540 |
6 151 2 757 6 186 |
55 057 59 947 6 439 99 813 67 822 5 540 |
| Total liabilities at fair value |
45 058 | 286 383 | 16 094 | 347 535 | 41 805 | 237 719 | 15 094 | 294 618 |
1 Recurring fair value measurements of assets or liabilities are those assets and liabilities that IFRS require or permit to be carried at fair value
in the statement of financial position at the end of each reporting period.
2 The disposal group is measured on a non-recurring basis. 3 Restated. Refer to page 31 for further details on the restatement.
During the year, no significant assets or liabilities were transferred between level 1 and level 2 (2018: Rnil).
The following table provides a reconciliation of the opening to closing balance for all assets that are measured at fair value and incorporates inputs that are not based on observable market data (level 3).
| Derivative assets Rm |
Trading assets Rm |
Financial investments Rm |
Investment property Rm |
Loans and advances Rm |
Total Rm |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Balance at 1 January 2018 Total (losses)/gains included in profit or loss |
4 049 (453) |
5 084 154 |
8 770 1 329 |
32 226 493 |
50 129 1 523 |
|
| Trading revenue | (453) | 154 | (299) | |||
| Other revenue | 506 | 506 | ||||
| Investment gains | 823 | 493 | 1 316 | |||
| Total gains included in OCI | (19) | (19) | ||||
| Issuances and purchases | 800 | 504 | 448 | 719 | 2 471 | |
| Sales and settlements | (1 465) | (3 375) | (276) | (62) | (5 178) | |
| Transfers into level 31 | 418 | 5 | 423 | |||
| Transfers out of level 32 | (83) | (312) | (70) | (465) | ||
| Reclassifications | 831 | 831 | ||||
| Exchange movement losses | 143 | 130 | 20 | 293 | ||
| Balance at 31 December 2018 Total gains/(losses) included |
3 409 | 2 367 | 10 906 | 33 326 | 50 008 | |
| in profit or loss | 261 | 401 | (643) | 650 | (19) | 650 |
| Trading revenue | 261 | 401 | 662 | |||
| Other revenue | (97) | (19) | (116) | |||
| Investment (losses)/gains | (546) | 650 | 104 | |||
| Total losses included in OCI | 86 | 86 | ||||
| Issuances and purchases | 1 921 | 969 | 2 182 | 197 | 330 | 5 599 |
| Sales and settlements | (2 705) | (1 115) | (2 089) | (150) | (6 059) | |
| Transfers into level 31 | 56 | 10 | 66 | |||
| Transfers out of level 32 | (304) | (304) | ||||
| Exchange movement gains | (27) | 222 | (3) | 192 | ||
| Balance at 31 December 2019 | 2 611 | 2 622 | 10 664 | 34 180 | 161 | 50 238 |
1 Transfers of financial assets between levels of the fair value hierarchy are deemed to have occurred at the end of the reporting period. During the year, the valuation inputs of certain financial assets became unobservable. The fair value of these assets was transferred into level 3.
2 During the year, the valuation inputs of certain level 3 financial assets became observable. The fair value of these financial assets was transferred into level 2.
| Derivative assets Rm |
Trading assets Rm |
Financial investments Rm |
Investment property Rm |
Loans and advances Rm |
Total Rm |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | ||||||
| Trading revenue | 802 | 364 | 1 166 | |||
| Other revenue | (15) | (19) | (34) | |||
| Investment management and service fee income and gains |
(504) | 503 | (1) | |||
| Total | 802 | 364 | (519) | 503 | (19) | 1 131 |
| 2018 | ||||||
| Trading revenue | (456) | 159 | (297) | |||
| Other revenue1 | 34 | 34 | ||||
| Investment management and service fee income and gains1 |
370 | 717 | 1 087 | |||
| Total | (456) | 159 | 404 | 717 | 824 |
1 Amount for investment management and service fee income and gains was erroneously included in other revenue, this change did not have an impact on the income statement.
The following table provides a reconciliation of the opening to closing balance for all liabilities that are measured at fair value and incorporates inputs that are not based on observable market data (level 3).
| Derivative liabilities Rm |
Trading liabilities Rm |
Other financial liabilities Rm |
Total Rm |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Balance at 1 January 2018 | 5 406 | 3 039 | 1 229 | 9 674 |
| Total losses included in profit or loss | 1 465 | 102 | 329 | 1 896 |
| Issuances and purchases | 738 | 4 628 | 5 366 | |
| Sales and settlements | (789) | (195) | (984) | |
| Transfers out of level 31 | (34) | (1 112) | (1 146) | |
| Transfers into level 32 | 103 | 185 | 288 | |
| Balance at 31 December 2018 | 6 151 | 2 757 | 6 186 | 15 094 |
| Total losses/(gains) included in profit or loss | 256 | (265) | (18) | (27) |
| Issuances and purchases | 347 | 1 050 | 1 125 | 2 522 |
| Sales and settlements | (959) | (458) | (1 417) | |
| Transfers out of level 31 | (212) | (212) | ||
| Transfers into level 32 | 19 | 115 | 134 | |
| Balance at 31 December 2019 | 5 602 | 3 199 | 7 293 | 16 094 |
1 Transfers of financial liabilities between the levels of the fair value hierarchy are deemed to have occurred at the end of the reporting period. During
2018, the valuation inputs of certain financial liabilities became observable, the fair value of these liabilities were transferred out of level 3. 2 During the year, the valuation inputs of certain financial assets became unobservable. The fair value of these financial assets was transferred into level 3.
Unrealised losses/(gains) for the period included in profit or loss for level 3 liabilities held at the end of the reporting period
| Derivative liabilities Rm |
Trading liabilities Rm |
Other financial liabilities Rm |
Total Rm |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | ||||
| Trading revenue | 253 | (264) | (18) | (29) |
| 2018 | ||||
| Trading revenue | 1 568 | 101 | 329 | 1 998 |
The behaviour of the unobservable parameters used to determine fair value level 3 assets and liabilities is not necessarily independent, and may often hold a relationship with other observable and unobservable market parameters. Where material and possible, such relationships are captured in the valuation by way of correlation factors, though these factors are, themselves, frequently unobservable. In such instances, the range of possible and reasonable fair value estimates are taken into account when determining appropriate model adjustments.
The table that follows indicates the sensitivity of valuation techniques used in the determination of the fair value of level 3 assets and liabilities measured and disclosed at fair value. The table further indicates the effect that a significant change in one or more of the inputs to a reasonably possible alternative assumption, would have on profit or loss at the reporting date (where the change in the unobservable input would change the fair value of the asset or liability significantly). The interrelationship between these significant unobservable inputs (which mainly include discount rates, spot prices of the underlying, correlation factors, volatilities, dividend yields, earning yields and valuation multiplies) and the fair value measurement could be favourable/(unfavourable), if these inputs were higher (lower). The changes in the inputs that have been used in the analysis have been determined taking into account several considerations such as the nature of the asset or liability and the market within which the asset or liability is transacted.
| Change in | Effect on profit or loss | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| significant unobservable input |
Favourable Rm |
Unfavourable Rm |
||
| 2019 | ||||
| Derivative instruments | From (1%) to 1% | 295 | (295) | |
| Financial investments | From (1%) to 1% | 445 | (378) | |
| Trading assets | From (1%) to 1% | 65 | (65) | |
| Trading liabilities | From (1%) to 1% | 29 | (29) | |
| Investment property | From (1%) to 1% | 3 979 | (3 251) | |
| Total | 4 813 | (4 018) | ||
| 2018 | ||||
| Derivative instruments | From (1%) to 1% | 309 | (315) | |
| Financial investments | From (1%) to 1% | 59 | (58) | |
| Trading assets | From (1%) to 1% | 94 | (94) | |
| Trading liabilities | From (1%) to 1% | 68 | (68) | |
| Investment property | From (1%) to 1% | 5 628 | (4 611) | |
| Total | 6 158 | (5 146) |
In 2019, a 1% change (both favourable and unfavourable) of the significant unobservable inputs relating to the measurement of a financial investment classified as fair value through OCI resulted in a R129 million favourable and R127 million unfavourable, respectively, effect recognised in OCI (2018: R145 million favourable and unfavourable).
The other financial liabilities categorised as level 3 relate to third-party financial liabilities arising from the consolidation of mutual funds. A sensitivity analysis is therefore not provided since a similar sensitivity would arise on the assets that relate to these liabilities.
AFS Refer to key management assumptions and detailed accounting policies in annexure F for more information about valuation techniques used.
| 2019 | 2018 | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Level 1 Rm |
Level 2 Rm |
Level 3 Rm |
Total Rm |
Level 1 Rm |
Level 2 Rm |
Level 3 Rm |
Total Rm |
|
| Assets | ||||||||
| Cash and balances with central banks Pledged assets1 Financial investments1 Loans and advances |
9 639 122 895 11 056 |
605 30 038 193 644 |
58 863 977 802 |
9 639 663 153 796 1 182 502 |
7 374 114 072 12 560 |
1 676 673 25 332 161 474 |
5 914 947 877 |
9 050 673 145 318 1 121 911 |
| Total assets | 143 590 | 224 287 | 978 723 | 1 346 600 | 134 006 | 189 155 | 953 791 | 1 276 952 |
| Liabilities Deposits and debt funding Subordinated debt |
734 447 | 656 213 11 891 |
30 345 11 704 |
1 421 005 23 595 |
616 809 | 701 181 19 891 |
33 628 | 1 351 618 19 891 |
| Total liabilities | 734 447 | 668 104 | 42 049 | 1 444 600 | 616 809 | 721 072 | 33 628 | 1 371 509 |
1 The pledged assets and financial investments include a bond position which was disclosed as level 2 as at 31 December 2018; however due to deterioration of trading liquidity the bond position has been disclosed as level 3 as at 31 December 2019.
There were no significant liabilities measured at fair value that existed during the year which had been issued with inseparable third-party credit enhancements.
| Financial assets | Maximum exposure to credit risk Rm |
Exposure mitigated Rm |
Current year (loss)/ gain on changes in fair value attributable to changes in credit risk Rm |
Cumulative (loss)/gain on changes in fair value attributable to changes in credit risk Rm |
Current year changes in fair value attributable to related credit derivatives Rm |
Cumulative changes in fair value attributable to changes in credit derivatives Rm |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | ||||||
| Financial investments | 4 359 | (27) | (4) | |||
| 2018 | ||||||
| Financial investments | 16 646 | 37 | 23 |
1 The maximum exposure to credit risk for sovereign exposures is deemed to be insignificant, thus this balance primarily relates to corporate and bank exposures.
| Financial liabilities | Current year loss on changes in fair value attributable to changes in credit risk Rm |
Cumulative loss on changes in fair value attributable to changes in credit risk1 Rm |
Contractual payment required at maturity Rm |
Carrying amount Rm |
Difference between carrying amount and contractual payment Rm |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| With credit risk recognised in OCI | |||||
| 2019 Deposit and debt funding |
4 | 13 | 5 274 | 5 646 | 372 |
| Policyholders' liabilities | 107 891 | 107 891 | |||
| Subordinated debt Other financial liabilities |
(16) | 24 | 5 500 74 985 |
5 668 74 985 |
168 |
| Total | (12) | 37 | 193 650 | 194 190 | 540 |
| 2018 | |||||
| Deposit and debt funding | 9 | 9 | 6 234 | 6 439 | 205 |
| Policyholders' liabilities | 99 813 | 99 813 | |||
| Subordinated debt | 67 | 40 | 5 380 | 5 540 | 160 |
| Other financial liabilities | 67 822 | 67 822 | |||
| Total | 76 | 49 | 179 249 | 179 614 | 365 |
The changes in the fair value of the designated financial liabilities attributable to changes in credit risk are calculated by reference to the change in credit risk implicit in the market value of the group's senior notes.
| Revaluation | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Balance at beginning of the year Rm |
Gains/ (losses) Rm |
Balance at end of year Rm |
|
| 2019 | |||
| Visa shares | 64 | 77 | 141 |
| STRATE Limited | 118 | 31 | 149 |
| Other | 95 | (63) | 32 |
| Total | 277 | 45 | 322 |
| 2018 | |||
| Visa shares | 73 | (9) | 64 |
| STRATE Limited | 205 | (87) | 118 |
| Other | 129 | (34) | 95 |
| Total | 407 | (130) | 277 |
Strategic equity investments are designated at fair value through OCI on initial recognition. No gains and losses were transferred to retained earnings during the year. No dividends were received during the year. Amounts are net of taxation.
| Balance at beginning of the year Rm |
Net change in fair value Rm |
Realised fair value adjustments and reversal to profit or loss Rm |
Net expected credit loss raised/ (released) during the period Rm |
NCI and other movements Rm |
Balance at end of the year Rm |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | ||||||
| Sovereign | 246 | 74 | (14) | 41 | (72) | 275 |
| Total | 246 | 74 | (14) | 41 | (72) | 275 |
| 2018 | ||||||
| Sovereign | 175 | 22 | (46) | 19 | 76 | 246 |
| Total | 175 | 22 | (46) | 19 | 76 | 246 |
| Balance at the beginning of the year Rm |
Net change in fair value Rm |
Balance at the end of the year Rm |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | |||
| Total | 523 | 74 | 597 |
| 2018 | |||
| Total | 582 | (59) | 523 |
IFRS requires a financial asset and a financial liability to be offset and the net amount presented in the statement of financial position when, and only when, the group has a current legally enforceable right to set off recognised amounts, as well as the intention to settle on a net basis or to realise the asset and settle the liability simultaneously. There are no other instances apart from the cash management accounts, where the group has a current legally enforceable right to offset, as well as the intention to settle on a net basis or to realise the asset and settle the liability simultaneously.
The following table sets out the impact of offset, as well as the required disclosures for financial assets and financial liabilities that are subject to enforceable master netting arrangements or similar agreements, irrespective of whether they have been offset in accordance with IFRS. It should be noted that the information below is not intended to represent the group and company's actual credit exposure, nor will it agree to that presented in the statement of financial position.
| Gross amount of recognised financial assets1 Rm |
Financial liabilities set off in the statement of financial position2 Rm |
Net amount of financial assets subject to netting agreements3 Rm |
Collateral received4 Rm |
Net amount Rm |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Assets | |||||
| 2019 | |||||
| Derivative assets | 64 347 | 64 347 | (57 027) | 7 320 | |
| Trading assets | 25 278 | 25 278 | (18 327) | 6 951 | |
| Loans and advances5 | 100 096 | (35 348) | 64 748 | (62 426) | 2 322 |
| Total | 189 721 | (35 348) | 154 373 | (137 780) | 16 593 |
| 2018 | |||||
| Derivative assets | 45 401 | 45 401 | (41 628) | 3 773 | |
| Trading assets | 35 998 | 35 998 | (33 806) | 2 192 | |
| Loans and advances5 | 66 943 | (32 722) | 34 221 | (31 417) | 2 804 |
| Total | 148 342 | (32 722) | 115 620 | (106 851) | 8 769 |
| Gross amount of recognised financial liabilities1 Rm |
Financial assets set off in the statement of financial position2 Rm |
Net amount of financial liabilities subject to netting agreements3 Rm |
Collateral pledged6 Rm |
Net amount Rm |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Liabilities | |||||
| 2019 | |||||
| Derivative liabilities | 64 742 | 64 742 | (56 717) | 8 025 | |
| Trading liabilities | 23 291 | 23 291 | (23 291) | ||
| Deposits and debt funding5 | 40 475 | (35 348) | 5 127 | 5 127 | |
| Total | 128 508 | (35 348) | 93 160 | (80 008) | 13 152 |
| 2018 | |||||
| Derivative liabilities | 47 365 | 47 365 | (40 821) | 6 544 | |
| Trading liabilities | 876 | 876 | (876) | ||
| Deposits and debt funding5 | 38 848 | (32 722) | 6 126 | (12) | 6 114 |
| Total | 87 089 | (32 722) | 54 367 | (41 709) | 12 658 |
1 Gross amounts are disclosed for recognised financial assets and financial liabilities that are either offset in the statement of financial position or are subject to a master netting arrangement or a similar agreement, irrespective of whether the offsetting criteria is met.
2 Gross amounts of recognised financial assets or financial liabilities that qualify for offset in accordance with the criteria per IFRS.
3 Related amounts not offset in the statement of financial position that are subject to a master netting arrangement or similar agreement.
4 This could include financial collateral (whether recognised or unrecognised), cash collateral, as well as exposures that are available to the group and company to be offset in the event of default. In most cases the group and company is allowed to sell or repledge collateral received.
5 The most material amounts offset in the statement of financial position pertain to cash management accounts. The cash management accounts allow holding companies (or central treasury functions) to manage the cash flows of a group by linking the current accounts of multiple legal entities within a group. It allows for cash balances of the different legal entities to be offset against each other to arrive at a net balance for the whole group. In addition, all repurchase agreements (for financial liabilities) and reverse repurchase agreements (for financial assets), subject to master netting arrangement (or similar agreement), have been included.
6 In most instances, the counterparty may not sell or repledge collateral pledged by the group.
The table below sets out the nature of agreements and the types of rights relating to items which do not qualify for offset but that are subject to a master netting arrangement or similar agreement.
| Nature of agreement | Related rights | |
|---|---|---|
| Derivative assets and liabilities | International swaps and derivatives association agreements |
The agreement allows for offset in the event of default |
| Trading assets and liabilities | Global master repurchase agreements | The agreement allows for offset in the event of default |
| Loans and advances | Customer agreement and Banks Act | In the event of liquidation or bankruptcy, offset shall be enforceable subject to all applicable laws and regulations |
| Deposits and debt funding | Customer agreement and Banks Act | In the event of liquidation or bankruptcy, offset shall be enforceable subject to all applicable laws and regulations |
| 2019 Rm |
2018 Rm |
|
|---|---|---|
| Letters of credit and bankers' acceptances Guarantees |
15 104 79 202 |
17 802 85 576 |
| Total | 94 306 | 103 378 |
Loan commitments of R73 940 million (2018: R77 253 million) that are irrevocable over the life of the facility or revocable only in response to material adverse changes are included in annexure C.
| 2019 Rm |
2018 Rm |
|
|---|---|---|
| Investment property | 601 | 748 |
| Property and equipment | 284 | 620 |
| Other intangible assets | 191 | 270 |
| Total | 1 076 | 1 638 |
The expenditure will be funded from the group's internal resources.
| 2018 Rm |
|
|---|---|
| Property and equipment | |
| Within one year | 1 756 |
| After one year but within five years | 4 691 |
| After five years | 823 |
| Total | 7 270 |
The group has, as permitted by IFRS 16, elected not to restate its comparative annual financial statements. Comparability will therefore not be achieved as the comparative annual financial information has been prepared on an IAS 17 basis. Refer to page 29 for more detail on the adoption of IFRS 16. Low-value assets comprise IT equipment and small items of office furniture.
The future minimum lease payments under non-cancellable operating leases for 2019 comprise of low-value assets and shortterm leases of R25 million within one year and for low-value assets R3 million are due within one and five years.
In the ordinary course of business, the group is involved as a defendant in litigation, lawsuits and other proceedings. Management recognises the inherent difficulty of predicting the outcome of defended legal proceedings. Nevertheless, based on management's knowledge from investigation, analysis and after consulting with legal counsel, management believes that there are no individual legal proceedings that are currently assessed as being 'likely to succeed and material' or 'unlikely to succeed but material should they succeed'. The group is also the defendant in some legal cases for which the group is fully indemnified by external third-parties, none of which are individually material. Management is accordingly satisfied that the legal proceedings currently pending against the group should not have a material adverse effect on the group's consolidated financial position and the directors are satisfied that the group has adequate insurance programmes and, where required in terms of IFRS for claims that are probable, provisions in place to meet claims that may succeed.
On 15 February 2017, South Africa's Competition Commission lodged five complaints with the Competition Tribunal against 18 institutions, including one against The Standard Bank of South Africa Limited (SBSA) and two against a former subsidiary of the group, Standard New York Securities Inc (SNYS), in which it alleges unlawful collusion between those institutions in the trading of USD/ZAR. The group has, with the help of external counsel, conducted its own internal investigations and found no evidence that supports the complaints. Both SBSA and SNYS, together with 12 of the other respondents, applied for dismissal of the complaint referral on various legal grounds. These applications were heard in July 2018. The complaint against SNYS was dismissed on the grounds that South Africa's competition regulators lack jurisdiction over it. In the case of SBSA the Competition Commission was directed to file an amended complaint containing sufficient facts to evidence the collusion alleged within 40 business days of the ruling or risk dismissal of the complaint. The allegations against SBSA are confined to USD/ZAR trading activities within SBSA and do not relate to the conduct of the group more broadly. A number of respondents have filed an appeal to the ruling raising various grounds, which will impact on the 40 business day deadline imposed on the Competition Commission for the filing of the amended complaint against SBSA. The Competition Tribunal (CT) issued a directive on 24 July 2019 to all parties. Pursuant to two appeals filed by the Competition Commission against judgements handed down by the Competition Appeal Court in favour of The Standard Bank of South Africa Limited (SBSA), on 20 February 2020, the Constitutional Court, by a majority of five to four judges, ordered that (a) the Competition Commission need not disclose its record of investigation into alleged collusion in foreign exchange markets until after both SBSA has filed its written defence to the complaint against it and the Competition Tribunal has directed that all parties make discovery of relevant documents, and (b) the Competition Appeal Court erred in not deciding if it had the requisite jurisdiction before ordering the Competition Commission to lodge its record of decision in SBSA's application to have the Competition Commission's decision to initiate a complaint of collusion against SBSA reviewed and set aside, and remitted that issue of jurisdiction back to the Competition Appeal Court for determination.
Under the terms of the disposal of Standard Bank Plc on 1 February 2015, the group provided ICBC with certain indemnities to be paid in cash to ICBC or, at ICBC's direction, to any Standard Bank Plc (now ICBCS) group company, a sum equal to the amount of losses suffered or incurred by ICBC arising from certain circumstances. Where an indemnity payment is required to be made by the group to the ICBCS group, such payment would be grossed up from ICBC's shareholding at the time in ICBCS to 100%. These payments may, inter alia, arise as a result of an enforcement action, the cause of which occurred prior to the date of disposal. Enforcement actions include actions taken by regulatory or governmental authorities to enforce the relevant laws in any jurisdiction. While there have been no material claims relating to these indemnification provisions during 2019, the indemnities provided are uncapped and of unlimited duration as they reflect that the precompletion regulatory risks attaching to the disposed-of business remain with the group post completion.
The group assesses the maturity of its assets and liabilities at 31 December each year. This gives an indication of the remaining life of these assets at that point in time. The following table illustrates the maturities based on a contractual discounted basis. For the maturity analysis of financial liabilities on a contractual undiscounted basis, refer to the funding and liquidity risk section within annexure C.
| Redeem | Within | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| able on demand |
Within one year |
one to five years |
After five years |
Undated1 | Total | ||
| Note | Rm | Rm | Rm | Rm | Rm | Rm | |
| 2019 | |||||||
| Cash and balances with | |||||||
| central banks2 | 1 | 16 700 | 58 588 | 75 288 | |||
| Trading assets | 3 | 4 084 | 93 827 | 33 355 | 74 587 | 16 949 | 222 802 |
| Pledged assets | 4 | 21 220 | 1 239 | 6 900 | 18 | 29 377 | |
| Financial investments | 5 | 4 859 | 147 123 | 38 679 | 7 687 | 368 971 | 567 319 |
| Gross loans and advances3 | 7 | 125 454 | 249 510 | 443 128 | 360 833 | 37 421 | 1 216 346 |
| Other financial assets | 9 | 17 767 | 420 | 1 011 | 19 198 | ||
| Net derivative asset | 2 | 597 | 4 550 | (1 175) | (2 063) | 1 909 | |
| Trading liabilities | 17 | (3 345) | (25 396) | (10 632) | (11 825) | (32 649) | (83 847) |
| Deposits and debt funding | 18 | (856 174) | (360 600) | (143 127) | (46 437) | (19 855) | (1 426 193) |
| Subordinated debt4 | 19 | (8 629) | (20 272) | (28 901) | |||
| Provisions and liabilities5 | 20 | (65) | (22 905) | (2 029) | (69 478) | (94 477) | |
| 2018 | |||||||
| Cash and balances with | |||||||
| central banks2 | 1 | 20 681 | 64 464 | 85 145 | |||
| Trading assets | 3 | 6 631 | 44 563 | 28 032 | 58 810 | 43 076 | 181 112 |
| Pledged assets | 4 | 18 058 | 800 | 671 | 350 | 19 879 | |
| Financial investments6 | 5 | 15 066 | 191 031 | 71 185 | 59 889 | 211 549 | 548 720 |
| Gross loans and advances3, 6 | 7 | 123 469 | 256 087 | 408 594 | 338 461 | 29 621 | 1 156 232 |
| Other financial assets7 | 9 | 2 565 | 8 778 | 299 | 392 | 12 034 | |
| Net derivative liability | 2 | 2 109 | (2 949) | (2 539) | (3 379) | ||
| Trading liabilities | 17 | (1 430) | (12 695) | (13 463) | (11 031) | (21 328) | (59 947) |
| Deposits and debt funding | 18 | (906 421) | (286 877) | (125 040) | (39 199) | (1 357 537) | |
| Subordinated debt4 | 19 | (5 965) | (17 072) | (3 322) | (26 359) | ||
| Provisions and liabilities7 | 20 | (44) | (17 919) | (1 545) | (60 216) | (79 724) |
1 Undated maturity category comprises of non-contractual or indeterminate maturity, including any item or position in respect of which no right or obligation in respect of maturity exists. The will include deferred tax and provisions for non-performing assets.
2 On demand cash and balances with central banks include notes and coins.
3 Includes loans and advances measured at fair value through profit or loss.
4 The maturity analysis for subordinated debt has been determined as the earlier of the contractual repayment date or the option by the issuer to redeem the debt.
5 The group and company have, as permitted by IFRS 16, elected not to restate its comparative annual financial statements. Comparability will therefore not be achieved as the comparative annual financial information has been prepared on an IAS 17 basis. Refer to page 29 for more detail on the adoption of IFRS 16. As a result, included in other financial liabilities are the lease liabilities. 6 Restated. Refer to page 31 on further details on the restatements.
7 The note disclosure has been disaggregated to show a better analysis of financial and non-financial assets and provisions and other liabilities as part of the adoption of the amendments to IAS 1 and IAS 8, this change had no impact on the SOFP.
| Less than 12 months after |
More than 12 months after |
|||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Note | reporting period Rm |
reporting period Rm |
Total Rm |
|
| 2019 | ||||
| Non-current assets held for sale | 6 | 2 599 | 2 599 | |
| Other assets | 9 | 10 593 | 110 | 10 703 |
| Interest in associates and joint ventures | 10 | 5 423 | 5 423 | |
| Investment property | 11 | 34 180 | 34 180 | |
| Property and equipment | 12 | 898 | 21 120 | 22 018 |
| Goodwill and other intangible assets | 13 | 797 | 21 526 | 22 323 |
| Provisions and other liabilities | 20 | (18 257) | (11 367) | (29 624) |
| Current and deferred tax asset | 14 | * | * | 4 868 |
| Current and deferred tax liability | 14 | * | * | (9 073) |
| 2018 | ||||
| Non-current assets held for sale | 762 | 762 | ||
| Other assets1 | 9 | 9 655 | 825 | 10 480 |
| Interest in associates and joint ventures | 10 | 10 376 | 10 376 | |
| Investment property | 11 | 33 326 | 33 326 | |
| Property and equipment | 12 | 894 | 18 300 | 19 194 |
| Goodwill and other intangible assets | 13 | 293 | 23 383 | 23 676 |
| Provisions and other liabilities1 | 20 | (19 169) | (10 860) | (30 029) |
| Current and deferred tax asset | 14 | * | * | 4 519 |
| Current and deferred tax liability | 14 | * | * | (8 015) |
1 The note disclosure has been disaggregated to show a better analysis of financial and non-financial assets and provisions and other liabilities as part of the adoption of the amendments to IAS 1 and IAS 8, this change had no impact on the SOFP.
* Undated.
| 2019 Rm |
2018 Rm |
|
|---|---|---|
| Effective interest rate interest income on: | ||
| Loans and advances | 113 724 | 106 583 |
| Financial investments1 | 14 694 | 20 561 |
| Interest income on credit-impaired financial assets | 1 082 | 922 |
| Total | 129 500 | 128 066 |
| Interest income on items measured at amortised cost | 126 861 | 122 444 |
| Interest income on debt instruments measured at FVOCI | 2 639 | 5 622 |
1 Restated. Refer to page 31 for more details on the restatement.
| 2019 Rm |
2018 Rm |
|
|---|---|---|
| Interest on deposits and debt funding Interest on lease liabilities1 (note 20.4) |
63 149 339 |
65 862 |
| Interest on subordinated debt | 3 093 | 2 699 |
| Total | 66 581 | 68 561 |
| Interest expense on items measured at amortised cost Interest expense on lease liabilities1 |
66 242 339 |
68 561 |
1 The group has, as permitted by IFRS 16, elected not to restate its comparative annual financial statements. Comparability will therefore not be achieved as the comparative annual financial information has been prepared on an IAS 17 basis. Refer to page 29 for more detail on the adoption of IFRS 16.
| 2019 Rm |
2018 Rm |
|
|---|---|---|
| Account transaction fees | 11 272 | 11 669 |
| Card-based commission | 7 041 | 6 760 |
| Documentation and administration fees | 2 281 | 2 273 |
| Electronic banking fees | 4 546 | 3 829 |
| Foreign currency service fees | 2 253 | 2 244 |
| Insurance – fees and commission | 1 857 | 1 904 |
| Knowledge-based fees and commission | 2 304 | 2 350 |
| Other | 5 800 | 5 563 |
| Total | 37 354 | 36 592 |
All fee and commission revenue reported above relates to financial assets or liabilities not carried at fair value through profit or loss.
| 2019 Rm |
2018 Rm |
|
|---|---|---|
| Account transaction fees | 1 460 | 1 368 |
| Card-based commission | 2 563 | 2 378 |
| Documentation and administration fees | 296 | 222 |
| Electronic banking fees | 736 | 687 |
| Insurance fees and commission | 497 | 546 |
| Customer loyalty expense | 664 | 624 |
| Other | 516 | 392 |
| Total | 6 732 | 6 217 |
All fee and commission expense reported above relates to financial assets or liabilities not carried at fair value through profit and loss.
| 2019 Rm |
20181 Rm |
|
|---|---|---|
| Commodities | 32 | 47 |
| Equities | 2 591 | 2 171 |
| Fixed income and currencies | 9 452 | 8 581 |
| Total | 12 075 | 10 799 |
1 Restated. Refer to page 31 for more detail.
| 2019 Rm |
20181 Rm |
|
|---|---|---|
| Banking and other revenue | 1 300 | 1 360 |
| Insurance – bancassurance profit | 2 493 | 2 096 |
| Property-related revenue | 296 | 407 |
| Total | 4 089 | 3 863 |
1 Restated. Refer to page 31 for more detail.
| 2019 Rm |
2018 Rm |
|
|---|---|---|
| Derecognition gains/(losses) on financial assets measured at amortised cost Fair value gains on debt financial assets measured at fair value through profit or loss – |
10 | (8) |
| default | 82 | 256 |
| Gains on debt realisation of financial assets measured at fair value through OCI1 | 149 | 174 |
| Fair value gains on financial instruments designated at fair value through profit or loss | 515 | 367 |
| Total | 756 | 789 |
1 Restated. Refer to page 31 for further details on the restatement.
| 2019 Rm |
2018 Rm |
|
|---|---|---|
| Insurance premiums | 42 182 | 40 611 |
| Reinsurance premiums | (2 381) | (2 090) |
| Total | 39 801 | 38 521 |
| 2019 Rm |
2018 Rm |
|
|---|---|---|
| Claims and policyholders' benefits under insurance contracts | 41 730 | 39 504 |
| Insurance claims recovered from reinsurers | (2 079) | (1 571) |
| Net insurance claims and policyholders' benefits | 39 651 | 37 933 |
| Change in policyholder liabilities under insurance contracts | 4 590 | (11 449) |
| Insurance contracts | 5 400 | (10 024) |
| Policyholder assets related to insurance contracts | (309) | 776 |
| Investment contracts with DPF | (171) | (1 607) |
| Reinsurance assets | (330) | (594) |
| Total | 44 241 | 26 484 |
| 2019 Rm |
2018 Rm |
|
|---|---|---|
| Investment income | 3 245 | 3 533 |
| Scrip lending fees Rental income from investment property Sundry income Adjustment to surplus recognised on defined benefit pension fund Other |
87 3 059 85 14 |
103 2 905 74 18 433 |
| Total | 3 245 | 3 533 |
| 32.1 | Revenue from contracts with customers | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ------ | -- | -- | -- | -- | --------------------------------------- |
| 2019 Rm |
2018 Rm |
|
|---|---|---|
| Fee income and reinsurance commission | ||
| Service fee income from long-term policyholder investment contracts | 1 312 | 1 232 |
| Service fee income from investment contracts | 1 330 | 1 251 |
| Deferred revenue released to profit or loss | 38 | 35 |
| Deferred income relating to new business | (56) | (54) |
| Fee revenue | 2 182 | 2 177 |
| Management fees on assets under management | 1 971 | 1 973 |
| Performance fees | 56 | 21 |
| Health administration fees | 98 | 53 |
| Other fee revenue | 57 | 130 |
| Reinsurance commission earned on short-term insurance business | 116 | 99 |
| Total fee income and reinsurance commission | 3 610 | 3 508 |
| Hotel sales operations | ||
| Hotel sales operations | 466 | 565 |
| Total | 4 076 | 4 073 |
| 2019 Rm |
2018 Rm |
|
|---|---|---|
| Financial assets classified at FVOCI | ||
| Service fee income from long-term policyholder investment contracts | ||
| Term deposits | 1 462 | 1 230 |
| At amortised cost | ||
| Policy loans receivable – interest income | 19 | 18 |
| Interest income on cash and cash equivalents | 439 | 268 |
| Total interest income on financial assets using the effective interest rate method | 1 920 | 1 516 |
| 2019 Rm |
2018 Rm |
|
|---|---|---|
| Fair value adjustments to long-term policyholder liabilities under investment contracts | (9 146) | 1 273 |
| Fair value adjustments to third-party mutual fund interests | (6 523) | (2 407) |
| Investment properties | 287 | 493 |
| Financial assets at fair value through profit or loss (default) | 35 375 | (209) |
| Financial instruments at fair value through profit or loss | 34 741 | 2 725 |
| Financial instruments held for hedging and for trading | 634 | (2 934) |
| Financial assets designated at fair value through profit or loss | 5 | 2 738 |
| Fair value of financial liabilities | (1 206) | (1 381) |
| Other | (20) | 56 |
| Total | 18 772 | 563 |
| 2019 Rm |
2018 Rm |
|
|---|---|---|
| Net expected credit loss raised/(released) | 9 207 | 7 515 |
| Financial investments (note 5) Loans and advances (note 7) Letters of credit and guarantees (note 20) |
86 9 319 (198) |
101 7 237 177 |
| Recoveries on loans and advances previously written off Modification loss on distressed financial asset |
(1 514) 271 |
(1 171) 145 |
| Total | 7 964 | 6 489 |
| 2019 Rm |
2018 Rm |
|
|---|---|---|
| Banking activities | 62 335 | 60 084 |
| Communication | 1 114 | 1 117 |
| Information technology | 7 487 | 6 379 |
| Marketing and advertising | 1 889 | 1 954 |
| Premises1 | 2 263 | 4 052 |
| Staff costs | 34 554 | 33 776 |
| Other | 15 028 | 12 806 |
| Investment management and life insurance activities1 | 16 486 | 16 404 |
| Acquisition costs | 4 241 | 4 413 |
| Office costs | 3 531 | 3 729 |
| Staff costs | 4 302 | 4 133 |
| Other | 4 412 | 4 129 |
| Total | 78 821 | 76 488 |
| The following disclosable items are included in other operating expenses: | ||
| Auditors' remuneration | 423 | 383 |
| Audit fees – current year | 410 | 360 |
| Fees for other services2 | 13 | 23 |
| Amortisation – intangible assets (note 13) | 2 596 | 2 504 |
| Depreciation (note 12) | 4 864 | 2 858 |
| Operating lease charges1 | 505 | 2 286 |
| Premises – other expenses | 2 263 | 1 772 |
| Professional fees | 1 828 | 1 712 |
1 The group has, as permitted by IFRS 16, elected not to restate its comparative annual financial statements. Comparability will therefore not be achieved as the comparative annual financial information has been prepared on an IAS 17 basis. Refer to page 29 for more detail on the adoption of IFRS 16.
2 All fees for services paid to the group's auditors were considered and approved by the group's audit committee in terms of its non-audit services policy. Refer to the report of the group audit committee chairman for further information.
| 2019 Rm |
2018 Rm |
|
|---|---|---|
| Profit on disposal of business | 47 | |
| Impairment of associates | (2 418) | (5) |
| Impairment of intangible assets | (234) | (449) |
| Impairment of non-current assets held for sale | (321) | (249) |
| Impairment of goodwill | (11) | |
| (Loss)/profit on sale of property and equipment | (94) | 15 |
| Fair value gain on investment property | 188 | |
| Total | (2 890) | (641) |
| 2019 Rm |
2018 Rm |
|
|---|---|---|
| Value added tax (VAT)1 Other indirect taxes and levies |
1 669 923 |
1 722 887 |
| Total | 2 592 | 2 609 |
1 The group earns certain amounts of VAT exempt income which result in these amounts of VAT input that the group is unable to claim from the revenue authorities.
| 2019 Rm |
2018 Rm |
|
|---|---|---|
| South African normal taxation | 9 149 | 9 672 |
| Current Prior year |
9 387 (238) |
9 911 (239) |
| Deferred taxation | 456 | (3 101) |
| Current Prior year |
397 59 |
(3 113) 12 |
| CGT, foreign normal and withholding tax – current year | 1 162 | 164 |
| Direct taxation before tax recognised in OCI and equity Income tax recognised in OCI Deferred tax recognised directly in equity Deferred tax recognised directly in retained earnings – IFRS 9 Deferred tax recognised directly in retained earnings – IFRS 16 |
10 767 (106) (30) (72) |
6 735 87 (128) 2 401 |
| Direct taxation per the income statement | 10 559 | 9 095 |
The table below sets out the amount of income tax relating to each component within OCI:
| 2019 Rm |
2018 Rm |
|
|---|---|---|
| Items that may be subsequently reclassified to profit or loss | ||
| Movements in the cash flow hedging reserve | (69) | 10 |
| Net change in fair value of cash flow hedges | (151) | 129 |
| Realised fair value adjustments of cash flow hedges transferred to profit or loss | 82 | (119) |
| Net change in investments measured at fair value through other comprehensive | ||
| income (OCI) | 5 | (5) |
| Net change in expected credit loss | 1 | |
| Net change in fair value | 4 | 6 |
| Realised fair value adjustments transferred to profit or loss | (11) | |
| Items that may not be subsequently reclassified to profit or loss | ||
| Defined benefit fund adjustments | (52) | 30 |
| Change in own credit risk recognised on financial liabilities designated at fair value through | ||
| profit or loss | 4 | 21 |
| Net change in fair value of equity financial investments measured at fair value through OCI | 32 | |
| Other | 6 | (1) |
| Total | (106) | 87 |
| 2019 % |
2018 % |
|
|---|---|---|
| Direct taxation – statutory rate | 28.0 | 28.0 |
| Prior period tax | (0.4) | (0.5) |
| Direct taxation – current year | 27.6 | 27.5 |
| Capital gains tax | 1.5 | (1.0) |
| Foreign tax and withholding tax | 3.4 | 2.7 |
| Direct taxation – current year – normal | 32.5 | 29.2 |
| Permanent differences | (6.9) | (7.4) |
| Dividends received | (4.8) | (3.6) |
| Other non-taxable income – interest1 | (5.5) | (6.6) |
| Assessed loss not subject to deferred tax2 | 0.7 | 0.6 |
| Non-deductible expenses | 3.6 | 2.9 |
| Effects of profits taxed in different jurisdictions | (0.9) | (0.7) |
| Direct effective tax rate3 | 25.6 | 21.8 |
1 Relates to interest income earned from certain governments in Africa Regions which is exempt from tax.
2 The group's assessed losses result in an unrecognised deferred tax asset of R269 million (2018: R224 million).
3 Expressed as a percentage of profit before direct taxation.
The calculations of basic earnings per ordinary share and diluted earnings per ordinary share are as follows:
| 2019 Number of units ('000) |
2018 Number of units ('000) |
|
|---|---|---|
| Earnings attributable to ordinary shareholders (Rm) | 25 443 | 27 453 |
| Weighted average number of ordinary shares in issue (number of shares) Weighted average number of ordinary shares in issue before adjustments Adjusted for shares held pursuant to Tutuwa initiative1 Adjusted for deemed treasury shares held by entities within the group2 |
1 619 124 (2 050) (20 450) |
1 618 700 (4 178) (20 803) |
| Weighted average number of ordinary shares in issue | 1 596 624 | 1 593 719 |
| Basic earnings per ordinary share (cents) | 1 593.5 | 1 722.6 |
| Diluted earnings per ordinary share Weighted average number of ordinary shares in issue Adjusted for the following potential dilution: Share incentive schemes |
1 596 624 8 887 |
1 593 719 16 126 |
| Standard Bank GSIS3 Standard Bank EGS4 Deferred Bonus Scheme Performance Reward Plan Share Appreciation Rights Scheme Tutuwa initiative5 |
188 1 322 5 426 1 927 24 |
318 2 302 6 716 3 680 34 3 076 |
| Diluted weighted average number of ordinary shares in issue | 1 605 511 | 1 609 845 |
| Diluted earnings per ordinary share (cents) | 1 584.7 | 1 705.3 |
1 The number of shares held by the Tutuwa participants are deducted as they are deemed not to be issued in terms of IFRS.
2 The number of shares held by entities within the group are deemed to be treasury shares for IFRS purposes.
3 275 121 (2018: 696 115) share options were outstanding at the end of the year in terms of the GSIS.
4 4 941 267 (2018: 7 364 238) rights were outstanding at the end of the year in terms of the Standard Bank EGS. These units are convertible into
1 379 838 (2018: 2 557 500) ordinary shares at year end. 5 Dilutive effect of shares held pursuant to Tutuwa initiative.
6 979 195 (2018: 5 834 741) units were issued during the year to employees domiciled in South Africa. The dilutive impact of these units are included in the calculation of diluted earnings per ordinary share.
At the end of the reporting period, the group had 9 741 287 (2018: 10 640 573) units hedged, which results in 127 410 (2018: 224 887) dilutive shares being issued by the group and is included in the above dilutive earnings per ordinary share.
2 626 716 (2018: 1 947 028) units were issued during the year to employees domiciled in South Africa. The dilutive impact of these units are included in the calculation of diluted earnings per ordinary share.
At the end of the reporting period, 2 501 149 (2018: 5 151 149) units were hedged. which results in 257 464 (2018: 253 762) dilutive shares being issued by the group and is included in the above dilutive earnings per ordinary share.
1 215 820 (2018: 675 339) rights were issued during the year in terms of the Standard Bank SARP to employees domiciled in South Africa. The outstanding SARP units are convertible into 42 131 (2018: 80 197) ordinary shares. The dilutive impact of these units are included in the calculation of diluted earnings per ordinary share.
AFS Refer to annexure D for further details on the group's share incentive schemes.
| Gross Rm |
Direct tax Rm |
Non controlling interests Rm |
Profit attributable to ordinary shareholders Rm |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 Profit for the year |
41 255 | (10 559) | (5 253) | 25 443 |
| Headline adjustable items added IAS 16 – Profit on sale of property and equipment IAS 28/IAS 36 – Impairment of associate IAS 36 – Impairment of intangible assets IFRS 5 – Impairment of non-current assets held for sale IAS 40 – Fair value gain on investment property |
2 890 94 2 418 234 321 (188) |
15 (29) (65) 109 |
(141) 1 (142) |
2 764 66 2 418 169 179 (79) |
| IAS 36 – Goodwill impairment Standard Bank Group headline earnings |
11 44 145 |
(10 544) | (5 394) | 11 28 207 |
| 2018 Profit for the year Headline adjustable items added |
41 738 641 |
(9 095) (122) |
(5 190) (107) |
27 453 412 |
| IAS 16 – Profit on sale of property and equipment IAS 27/IAS 28 – Gain on disposal of business IAS 28/IAS 36 – Impairment of associate IAS 36 – Impairment of intangible assets IFRS 5 – Impairment of non-current assets held for sale |
(15) (47) 5 449 249 |
2 (1) (123) |
3 (110) |
(10) (47) 4 326 139 |
| Standard Bank Group headline earnings | 42 379 | (9 217) | (5 297) | 27 865 |
| 2019 Rm |
2018 Rm |
|||
| Headline earnings per ordinary share (cents) Diluted headline earnings per ordinary share (cents) |
1 766.7 1 756.9 |
1 748.4 1 730.9 |
Headline earnings is calculated in accordance with the circular titled Headline Earnings issued by SAICA, as amended from time-to-time.
| 2019 Rm |
2018 Rm |
|
|---|---|---|
| Ordinary shares | 16 092 | 15 221 |
| Final 540 cents per share declared on 6 March 2019 (2018: 510 cents per share declared on 8 March 2018) |
8 740 | 8 263 |
| Interim 454 cents per share declared on 7 August 2019 (2018: 430 cents per share declared on 17 August 2018) |
7 352 | 6 958 |
| Second preference shares | 415 | 416 |
| Final 390.22 cents per share declared on 6 March 2019 (2018: 398.92 cents per share declared on 8 March 2018) |
207 | 211 |
| Interim 391.38 cents per share declared on 7 August 2019 (2018: 386.43 cents per share declared on 17 August 2018) |
208 | 205 |
| AT1 capital | 458 | 322 |
| 31 December SBT 101 SBT 102 SBT 103 30 September |
40 40 40 |
41 42 |
| SBT 101 SBT 102 SBT 103 |
40 40 40 |
40 40 |
| 30 June SBT 101 SBT 102 SBT 103 |
40 40 40 |
39 40 |
| 30 March SBT 101 SBT 102 SBT 103 |
40 40 18 |
40 40 |
| Total dividends | 16 965 | 15 959 |
A final dividend No. 101 of 540 cents per ordinary share was declared on 4 March 2020, payable on 28 April 2020 to all shareholders registered on 24 April 2020, bringing the total dividends declared in respect of 2019 to 994 cents per share (2018: 970 cents per share).
6.5% first cumulative preference shares dividend No. 101 of 3.25 cents per share (2018: 3.25 cents) was declared on 4 March 2020, payable on 20 April 2020 to all shareholders registered on 17 April 2020.
Non-redeemable, non-cumulative, non-participating preference shares dividend No. 31 of 389.12 cents per share (2018: 390.22 cents), was declared on 4 March 2020, payable on 20 April 2020 to all shareholders registered on 17 April 2020.
The AT1 capital bonds have coupon rates of three month plus 565 basis points (SBT 101), JIBAR plus 545 basis points (SBT 102) and JIBAR plus 440 basis points (SBT 103) interest is payable quarterly. For more information on AT1 capital, refer to note 15.8.
| 2019 Rm |
2018 Rm |
|
|---|---|---|
| Depreciation and amortisation (note 35) | 7 460 | 5 362 |
| Credit impairment losses (note 34) | 7 964 | 6 489 |
| Investment gains and policyholders' transfers | 13 966 | (12 306) |
| Net inflows/(outflows) from third-party financial liabilities arising on consolidation of | ||
| mutual funds | 2 245 | (3 934) |
| Interest expense1 | 66 824 | 68 365 |
| Interest income1, 2 | (165 660) | (131 314) |
| Other | 3 695 | (3 154) |
| Total | (63 506) | (70 492) |
1 Included are non-cash flow items disclosed in income/expenses from investment management and life insurance activities.
2 Restated. Refer to page 31 for further details on the restatement.
| 2019 Rm |
2018 Rm |
|
|---|---|---|
| Net derivative assets | (3 121) | 85 |
| Trading assets | (43 306) | (17 062) |
| Pledged assets | (10 747) | 2 023 |
| Financial investments | (13 772) | (26 799) |
| Loans and advances | (89 119) | (47 224) |
| Other assets | (9 029) | 3 640 |
| Total | (169 094) | (85 337) |
| 2019 Rm |
2018 Rm |
|
|---|---|---|
| Deposit and debt funding | 116 387 | 72 445 |
| Trading liabilities | 23 027 | (2 704) |
| Provisions and other liabilities | 1 246 | 9 061 |
| Total | 140 660 | 78 802 |
| 2019 Rm |
2018 Rm |
|
|---|---|---|
| Balance at the beginning of the year | 26 359 | 24 397 |
| Subordinated debt issued | 7 269 | 6 100 |
| Subordinated debt redeemed | (4 850) | (4 550) |
| Exchange movements | (36) | 232 |
| Decrease in subordinated bonds issued to group companies | 131 | |
| Other movements | 159 | 49 |
| Balance at the end of the year | 28 901 | 26 359 |
AFS Refer to note 19 for details on subordinated debt.
Key management personnel include: the members of the SBG board of directors and prescribed officers active for 2019 and 2018. Non-executive directors are included in the definition of key management personnel as required by IFRS. Prescribed officers are defined by the Companies Act. The definition of key management includes the close family members of key management personnel and any entity over which key management exercises control or joint control. Close family members are those family members who may be expected to influence, or be influenced by, that person in their dealings with SBG. They may include the person's domestic partner and children, the children of the person's domestic partner, and dependants of the person or the person's domestic partner.
| 2019 Rm |
2018 Rm |
|
|---|---|---|
| Key management compensation | ||
| Salaries and other short-term benefits paid | 80 | 101 |
| Post-employment benefits Value of share options, rights and units expensed |
4 93 |
5 134 |
| Total key management compensation | 177 | 240 |
| Loans and advances1 | ||
| Loans outstanding at the beginning of the year | 22 | 12 |
| Change in key management structures | (2) | 2 |
| Net change in loans during the year | 8 | |
| Loans outstanding at the end of the year | 20 | 22 |
| Interest income | 1 | 1 |
| Deposit and debt funding2 | ||
| Deposits outstanding at the beginning of the year | 141 | 80 |
| Change in key management structures | (4) | 57 |
| Net change in deposits during the year | 10 | 4 |
| Deposits outstanding at the end of the year | 147 | 141 |
| Net interest expense | (6) | (5) |
| Investment products | ||
| Balance at the beginning of the year | 435 | 431 |
| Change in key management structures | 2 | |
| Net change in investments during the year | 105 | 2 |
| Balance at the end of the year | 540 | 435 |
| Third-party funds under management | ||
| Fund value at the beginning of the year | 222 | 224 |
| Change in key management structures | (130) | |
| Net change in deposits during the year | 10 | (2) |
| Fund value at the end of the year | 102 | 222 |
| Net investment return | 5 | (16) |
| Shares and share options held3 | ||
| Shares beneficially owned (number) | 1 667 867 | 1 738 101 |
| Share options held (number) | 2 315 897 | 3 569 592 |
1 Loans include mortgage loans, vehicle and asset finance and credit cards. No specific credit impairments have been recognised in respect of loans granted to key management in the current or prior year. The mortgage loans and vehicle and asset finance are secured by the underlying assets. All other loans are unsecured.
2 Deposits and debt funding include cheque, current and savings accounts.
3 Aggregate details of SBG shares and share options held by key management personnel.
Transactions with ICBCS are made in the ordinary course of business and on substantially the same terms, including interest rates and collateral, as those prevailing at the time for comparable transactions with other third-parties. These transactions also did not involve more than the normal risk of collectability or present other unfavourable features. There were no significant credit impairments related to balances and transactions with ICBCS. The following significant balances and transactions were entered into between the group and ICBCS, an associate of the group:
| Amounts included in the group's statement of financial position | 2019 Rm |
2018 Rm |
|---|---|---|
| Derivative assets | 4 227 | 905 |
| Trading assets | 10 | 9 |
| Loans and advances | 11 394 | 28 726 |
| Other assets | 392 | 245 |
| Derivative liabilities | (2 573) | (3 260) |
| Trading liabilities | (2 933) | |
| Deposits and debt funding | (2 184) | (282) |
| Other liabilities | (1 595) | (437) |
The group entered into certain transitional services level arrangements with ICBCS in order to manage the orderly separation of ICBCS from the group post the sale of 60% of SB Plc. In terms of these arrangements, services are delivered and received from ICBCS for the account of each respective party. As at 31 December 2019, the expense recognised in respect of these arrangements amounted to R496 million (2018: R229 million).
The group has several business relationships with ICBC, a 20.1% shareholder of the group. Transactions with ICBC are made in the ordinary course of business and on substantially the same terms, including interest rates and collateral, as those prevailing at the time for comparable transactions with other third-parties. These transactions also did not involve more than the normal risk of collectability or present other unfavourable features. There were no significant credit impairments that related to balances and transactions with ICBC. The following significant balances and transactions were entered into between the group and ICBC, excluding those with ICBCS.
| Amounts included in the group's statement of financial position | 2019 Rm |
2018 Rm |
|---|---|---|
| Loans and advances | 14 569 | 15 539 |
| Other assets1 | 433 | 345 |
| Deposits and debt funding | (789) | (3 724) |
1 The group recognised losses in respect of certain commodity reverse repurchase agreements with third-parties prior to the date of conclusion of the sale and purchase agreement, relating to SB Plc (now ICBCS) with ICBC. As a consequence of the sale and purchase agreement, the group holds the right to 60% of insurance and other recoveries, net of costs, relating to claims for those recognised losses prior to the date of conclusion of the transaction. Settlement of these amounts will occur based on audited information on pre-agreed anniversaries of the completion of the transaction and the full and final settlement of all claims in respect of losses incurred. As at 31 December 2019, a balance of USD26.7 million (R374 million) is receivable from ICBC in respect of this arrangement (2018: USD24.0 million; R345 million).
The group has off-balance sheet letters of credit exposure issued to ICBC as at 31 December 2019 of R3 573 million (2018: R1 952 million). The group received R91 million in fee and commission income relating to these transactions (2018: R63 million).
The group invests in various mutual funds that are managed by Liberty. Where the group has assessed that it has control (as defined by IFRS) over these mutual funds, it accounts for these mutual funds as subsidiaries. Where the group has assessed that it does not have control over these mutual funds, but has significant influence, it accounts for them as associates. The following significant balances and transactions were entered into between the group and the mutual funds which the group does not control:
| 2019 Rm |
2018 Rm |
|
|---|---|---|
| Trading liabilities | (86) | (592) |
| Deposits and debt funding | (22 519) | (24 896) |
| Trading (losses)/gains Interest expense |
(17) (1 270) |
(26) (2 689) |
Details of balances with SBG and transactions between SBG and the group's post-employment benefit plans are listed below:
| Amounts included in the group's statement of financial position and income statement | 2019 Rm |
2018 Rm |
|---|---|---|
| Fee and commission revenue | 11 | 22 |
| Deposits and debt funding | (361) | (981) |
| Interest expense | (36) | (50) |
| Financial investments held in bonds and money market | 833 | 778 |
In addition to the above:
AFS Refer to annexure A for more details on subsidiaries and annexure B for more details on associates.
| 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|
| Rm | Rm | |
| Amount recognised as assets in the statement of financial position (note 9) | ||
| Standard Bank banking activities | ||
| Retirement funds (note 43.1) | 945 | 765 |
| Other retirement funds (note 43.1) | 28 | 30 |
| Liberty | ||
| Retirement funds (note 43.1) | 117 | 203 |
| Total | 1 090 | 998 |
| Amounts recognised as liabilities in the statement of financial position (note 20) | ||
| Standard Bank banking activities | ||
| Post-employment healthcare benefits – other funds (note 43.2) | 745 | 766 |
| Liberty | ||
| Post-employment healthcare benefits (note 43.2) | 459 | 471 |
| Total | 1 204 | 1 237 |
The total amount recognised as an expense for the defined contribution plans operated by the group amounted to R597 million (2018: R593 million).
Membership of the principal fund, the Standard Bank Group Retirement Fund (SBGRF), comprises in excess of 95% of SBSA's permanent staff. The fund, one of the ten largest in South Africa, is governed by the Pension Funds Act 24 of 1956 (Pension Funds Act). Member-elected trustees represent 50% of the trustee board. The assets of the fund are held independently.
SBGRF is regulated by the Pension Funds Act, as well as the Financial Services Board.
The fund is subject to a statutory financial review by actuaries at an interval of not more than three years. A full actuarial valuation was performed during the 2018 financial year and, in the opinion of the actuary, the fund was considered to be financially sound. The next actuarial valuation is to be performed on 31 December 2020.
From 1 January 1995, new employees became entitled to defined contribution benefits only. Employees who were members of the fund on 31 December 1994, were entitled to guaranteed benefits under the old rules of the defined benefit fund. Given the defined benefit nature of the guaranteed benefits, the entire plan is classified as a defined benefit plan and accounted for as such. A specific liability was recognised within the fund to provide for the guaranteed defined benefits.
On 1 November 2009, the fund introduced individual member investment choice for defined contribution members and the pre-1995 members could choose to give up their guaranteed defined benefits and instead accept an offer of a 10% enhancement to their actuarial reserve values. Over 90% of the pre-1995 defined benefit members accepted the offer and converted to defined contribution plans. The assets and liabilities of the Provider Fund were transferred by way of a Section 14 transfer in terms of the Pension Funds Act, 1956 as amended into the SBGRF.
The majority of employees in South Africa who are not members of the SBGRF are members of two other funds designed for their occupational groups. Employees in territories beyond South African jurisdiction are members of either defined contribution or defined benefit plans governed by legislation in their respective countries.
The Liberty defined benefit pension scheme closed to new employees from 1 March 2001 and with effect from this date, the majority of employees accepted an offer to convert their retirement plans from defined benefit to defined contribution plans. Employees joining after 1 March 2001 automatically become members of the defined contribution schemes. The Automatic Contribution Arrangement (ACA) and Rentmeester defined benefit pension funds are all fully funded. All funds are governed by the Pension Funds Act.
Post-retirement obligation risk is the risk to the group's comprehensive income that arises from the requirement to contribute as an employer to an under-funded defined benefit plan. The group operates both defined contribution plans and defined benefit plans, with the majority of its employees participating in defined contribution plans. The defined benefit pension and healthcare schemes for past and certain current employees, create post-retirement obligations. The group mitigates these risks through independent asset managers and independent asset and liability management advisors for material funds. Potential residual risks which may impact the group are managed within the group asset and liability management process.
43.1 Retirement funds continued
| 2019 Rm |
2018 Rm |
|
|---|---|---|
| The amounts recognised in the statement of financial position in respect of the retirement funds are determined as follows: |
||
| Present value of funded obligations Fair value of plan assets |
(36 716) 37 944 |
(34 206) 35 235 |
| Surplus Asset ceiling |
1 228 (138) |
1 029 (31) |
| Included in the statement of financial position | 1 090 | 998 |
| SBGRF | 945 | 765 |
| Liberty retirement funds | 117 | 203 |
| Other retirement funds | 28 | 30 |
| Included in the following notes to the annual financial statements | 1 090 | 998 |
| Other assets (note 9) | 1 090 | 998 |
| Other liabilities (note 20) | ||
| Movement in the present value of funded obligations | ||
| Balance at the beginning of the year | 34 206 | 35 438 |
| Current service cost | 1 287 | 1 060 |
| Interest cost | 3 267 | 3 174 |
| Employee contributions Actuarial loss/(gain) |
918 (124) |
841 (3 765) |
| Exchange (gain)/loss | (3) | 69 |
| Benefits paid | (2 835) | (2 611) |
| Balance at the end of the year | 36 716 | 34 206 |
| Movement in the fair value of plan assets | ||
| Balance at the beginning of the year | 35 235 | 36 553 |
| Interest income | 3 367 | 3 259 |
| Contributions received Net return on assets |
2 194 (7) |
1 733 (3 763) |
| Exchange (loss)/gain | (10) | 64 |
| Benefits paid | (2 835) | (2 611) |
| Reduction in employer surplus account | ||
| Balance at the end of the year | 37 944 | 35 235 |
| Cash | 1 220 | 711 |
| Equities | 14 923 | 14 796 |
| Bonds | 10 669 | 10 407 |
| Property and other | 11 132 | 9 321 |
Plan assets do not include property occupied by the group.
The group expects to pay R1 250 million in contributions to the Standard Bank retirement funds in 2020 (2019: R1 294 million).
| 2019 Rm |
2018 Rm |
|
|---|---|---|
| The amounts recognised in profit or loss are determined as follows: Current service cost Net interest costs |
1 276 | 1 060 (85) |
| Included in staff costs | 1 276 | 975 |
| The expected long-term rate of return is based on the expected long-term returns on equities, cash and bonds. The split between the individual asset categories is considered in setting these assumptions. Adjustments were made to reflect the effect of expenses. Components of statement of other OCI Actuarial (loss) under asset management |
(7) | (3 763) |
| Actuarial gain | 124 | 3 765 |
| Gain from changes in demographic assumptions (Loss)/gain from changes in financial assumptions Gain from changes in experience adjustments |
6 (55) 173 |
2 805 960 |
| Asset ceiling | (107) | 33 |
| Remeasurements recognised in OCI | 10 | 35 |
| Reconciliation of net defined benefit asset Net defined benefit asset at the beginning of the year Net expense recognised Amounts recognised in OCI Company contributions Exchange loss |
998 (1 188) 10 1 276 (6) |
1 051 (975) 35 892 (5) |
| Net defined benefit asset at the end of the year | 1 090 | 998 |
The group provides the following post-employment healthcare benefits to its employees:
The largest portion of this liability represents a South African post-employment healthcare benefit scheme that covers all employees who went on retirement before 1 March 2000. The liability is unfunded and is valued every year using the projected unit credit method. The latest full actuarial valuation was performed at 31 December 2019. The next actuarial valuation is to be performed on 31 December 2020.
Liberty operates an unfunded post-employment medical aid benefit for employees who joined before 1 July 1998. For past service of employees, Liberty recognises and provides for the actuarially determined present value of post-employment medical aid employer contributions on an accrual basis using the projected unit credit method.
| 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|
| Rm | Rm | |
| The amounts recognised in the statement of financial position in respect of post employment healthcare benefits are determined as follows: |
||
| Present value of unfunded defined benefit obligations | 1 204 | 1 237 |
| Included in the statement of financial position | 1 204 | 1 237 |
| Standard Bank | 745 | 766 |
| Liberty | 459 | 471 |
| Movement in the present value of defined benefit obligations | ||
| Balance at beginning of the year | 1 237 | 1 232 |
| Net expense recognised | 118 | 126 |
| Benefits paid | (89) | (91) |
| Amounts recognised in OCI | (61) | (33) |
| Foreign exchange movements | (1) | 3 |
| Balance at end of the year | 1 204 | 1 237 |
| 2019 | 2018 | |
| Rm | Rm | |
| The amounts recognised in profit or loss are determined as follows: | ||
| Current service cost | 10 | 57 |
| Net interest cost | 108 | 69 |
| Included in staff costs | 118 | 126 |
| Components of statement of other comprehensive income | ||
| Actuarial losses arising from changes in financial assumptions | (30) | (78) |
| Actuarial (losses)/gains arising from experience adjustments | (31) | 45 |
| Remeasurements recognised in OCI | (61) | (33) |
Assumed medical inflation rates have a significant effect on the amounts recognised in profit or loss. A one percentage point change in the medical inflation rate would have the following effects on the amounts recognised:
| 2019 | 2018 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1% increase Rm |
1% decrease Rm |
1% increase Rm |
1% decrease Rm |
|
| Effect on the aggregate of the current service cost and interest cost Effect on the defined benefit obligation |
6 24 |
(5) (17) |
7 61 |
(5) (53) |

Banking and other financial services to individual customers, small to medium-sized enterprises and commercial banking customers in South Africa, Africa Regions and Wealth International. We enable customers to take control of all their financial aspects such as transacting, saving, borrowing or planning by making use of the following product sets either through face-to-face interaction or digitally according to their preference
Comprehensive suite of transactional, saving, investment, trade, foreign exchange, payment and liquidity management solutions made accessible through a range of physical and digital channels
Residential accommodation loans mainly to personal market customers
Services to customers, including governments, parastatals, larger corporates, financial institutions and multinational corporates
Provide in-depth sector expertise to develop relevant customer solutions and foster customer relationships
Trading and risk management solutions across financial markets, including foreign exchange, money markets, interest rates, equities, credit and commodities
Comprehensive suite of cash management, international trade finance, working capital and investor service solutions
Full suite of advisory and financing solutions, from term lending to structured and specialised products across the equity and debt capital markets

| Personal & Business Banking |
Corporate & Investment Banking |
|||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 Rm |
20181 Rm |
2019 Rm |
20181 Rm |
|
| Income from banking activities | 73 100 | 69 427 | 39 065 | 37 353 |
| Net interest income | 44 116 | 41 650 | 20 329 | 19 191 |
| Interest income Interest expense |
82 372 (38 256) |
77 588 (35 938) |
69 424 (49 095) |
69 374 (50 183) |
| Net fee and commission revenue | 24 985 | 24 739 | 6 002 | 5 950 |
| Fee and commission revenue | 30 944 | 30 284 | 6 609 | 6 477 |
| Fee and commission expense | (5 959) | (5 545) | (607) | (527) |
| Trading revenue | 425 | 174 | 11 670 | 10 543 |
| Other revenue | 3 553 | 2 872 | 335 | 903 |
| Other gains and losses on financial instruments | 21 | (8) | 729 | 766 |
| Income from investment management and life insurance activities |
||||
| Insurance premiums received | ||||
| Insurance benefits and claims paid | ||||
| Investment management and service fee income and gains | ||||
| Fair value adjustments to investments management liabilities and third-party fund interests |
||||
| Total income | 73 100 | 69 427 | 39 065 | 37 353 |
| Credit impairment charges | (6 360) | (5 440) | (1 590) | (1 049) |
| Net income before operating expenses | 66 740 | 63 987 | 37 475 | 36 304 |
| Operating expenses in banking operations2 Operating expenses in life insurance operations |
(43 243) | (41 906) | (20 985) | (20 315) |
| Net income before capital items and equity accounted earnings Non-trading and capital related items |
23 497 (69) |
22 081 (22) |
16 490 (189) |
15 989 (385) |
| Share of post tax profit/(loss) from associates | 325 | 325 | 2 | 102 |
| Net income before indirect taxation | 23 753 | 22 384 | 16 303 | 15 706 |
| Indirect taxation | (606) | (641) | (318) | (284) |
| Profit before direct taxation | 23 147 | 21 743 | 15 985 | 15 422 |
| Direct taxation | (5 802) | (5 530) | (2 285) | (2 249) |
| Profit for the year | 17 345 | 16 213 | 13 700 | 13 173 |
| Attributable to non-controlling interests | 610 | 542 | 1 858 | 2 104 |
| Attributable to other equity instrument holders | 160 | 141 | 229 | 144 |
| Attributable to ordinary shareholders | 16 575 | 15 530 | 11 613 | 10 925 |
| Headline earnings Return on equity (ROE) (%) |
16 510 22.4 |
15 539 21.9 |
11 795 18.1 |
11 202 19.3 |
| Net interest margin (bps) | 601 | 598 | 263 | 272 |
| Credit loss ratio (bps) | 89 | 81 | 32 | 16 |
| Cost-to-income ratio (%) | 59.2 | 60.4 | 53.7 | 54.4 |
| Number of employees | 26 040 | 27 499 | 3 555 | 3 751 |
1 Where reporting responsibility for individual cost centres and divisions within business units changes, the segmental analysis' comparative figures are
reclassified accordingly. Refer to page 31 for details on restatements, other than cost centre movements.
2 The group has, as permitted by IFRS 16, elected not to restate its comparative financial statements. Comparability will therefore not be achieved as the comparative financial information has been prepared on an IAS 17 basis. Refer to page 29 for more detail on the adoption of IFRS 16.
| Central and other | Banking activities | Other banking interests | Liberty | Standard Bank Group | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | 20181 | 2019 | 20181 | 2019 | 20181 | 2019 | 20181 | 2019 | 20181 |
| Rm | Rm | Rm | Rm | Rm | Rm | Rm | Rm | Rm | Rm |
| (1 704) | (1 449) | 110 461 | 105 331 | 110 461 | 105 331 | ||||
| (1 526) | (1 336) | 62 919 | 59 505 | 62 919 | 59 505 | ||||
| (22 296) 20 770 |
(18 896) 17 560 |
129 500 (66 581) |
128 066 (68 561) |
129 500 (66 581) |
128 066 (68 561) |
||||
| (365) | (314) | 30 622 | 30 375 | 30 622 | 30 375 | ||||
| (199) | (169) | 37 354 | 36 592 | 37 354 | 36 592 | ||||
| (166) | (145) | (6 732) | (6 217) | (6 732) | (6 217) | ||||
| (20) 201 |
82 88 |
12 075 4 089 |
10 799 3 863 |
12 075 4 089 |
10 799 3 863 |
||||
| 6 | 31 | 756 | 789 | 756 | 789 | ||||
| 23 573 | 21 722 | 23 573 | 21 722 | ||||||
| 39 801 | 38 521 | 39 801 | 38 521 | ||||||
| (44 241) | (26 484) | (44 241) | (26 484) | ||||||
| 9 241 | 9 122 | 9 241 | 9 122 | ||||||
| 18 772 | 563 | 18 772 | 563 | ||||||
| (1 704) | (1 449) | 110 461 | 105 331 | 23 573 | 21 722 | 134 034 | 127 053 | ||
| (14) | (7 964) | (6 489) | (7 964) | (6 489) | |||||
| (1 718) | (1 449) | 102 497 | 98 842 | 23 573 | 21 722 | 126 070 | 120 564 | ||
| 1 893 | 2 137 | (62 335) | (60 084) | (16 486) | (16 404) | (62 335) (16 486) |
(60 084) (16 404) |
||
| 175 | 688 | 40 162 | 38 758 | 7 087 | 5 318 | 47 249 | 44 076 | ||
| 107 | 15 | (151) | (392) | (2 418) | (321) | (249) | (2 890) | (641) | |
| 6 | 4 | 333 | 431 | (864) | 418 | 19 | 63 | (512) | 912 |
| 288 | 707 | 40 344 | 38 797 | (3 282) | 418 | 6 785 | 5 132 | 43 847 | 44 347 |
| (1 082) | (1 098) | (2 006) | (2 023) | (585) | (586) | (2 591) | (2 609) | ||
| (794) 199 |
(391) (44) |
38 338 (7 888) |
36 774 (7 823) |
(3 282) | 418 | 6 200 (2 672) |
4 546 (1 272) |
41 256 (10 560) |
41 738 (9 095) |
| (595) | (435) | 30 450 | 28 951 | (3 282) | 418 | 3 528 | 3 274 | 30 696 | 32 643 |
| 60 | (7) | 2 528 | 2 639 | 1 852 | 1 813 | 4 380 | 4 452 | ||
| 484 | 453 | 873 | 738 | 873 | 738 | ||||
| (1 139) | (881) | 27 049 | 25 574 | (3 282) | 418 | 1 676 | 1 461 | 25 443 | 27 453 |
| (1 089) | (894) | 27 216 | 25 847 | (864) | 418 | 1 855 | 1 600 | 28 207 | 27 865 |
| 18.1 | (13.1) | 5.6 | 16.5 | 15.2 | 16.8 | 18.0 | |||
| 431 68 |
438 56 |
||||||||
| 56.4 | 57.0 | ||||||||
| 15 401 | 16 169 | 44 996 | 47 419 | 5 695 | 5 759 | 50 691 | 53 178 |
44. Segment reporting continued 44.1 Segmental Income statement
Personal & Business Banking
1 Where reporting responsibility for individual cost centres and divisions within business units changes, the segmental analysis' comparative figures are
comparative financial information has been prepared on an IAS 17 basis. Refer to page 29 for more detail on the adoption of IFRS 16.
2 The group has, as permitted by IFRS 16, elected not to restate its comparative financial statements. Comparability will therefore not be achieved as the
reclassified accordingly. Refer to page 31 for details on restatements, other than cost centre movements.
Corporate & Investment
| South Africa Rm |
Africa Regions Rm |
International Rm |
Eliminations1 Rm |
Standard Bank Group Rm |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 Total income2 |
89 776 | 41 551 | 3 694 | (987) | 134 034 |
| Banking activities Liberty |
70 052 19 724 |
37 702 3 849 |
3 694 | (987) | 110 461 23 573 |
| Total headline earnings | 20 581 | 7 527 | 520 | (421) | 28 207 |
| Banking activities Other banking interests Liberty |
18 314 2 267 |
7 939 (412) |
1 384 (864) |
(421) | 27 216 (864) 1 855 |
| Total assets | 1 833 665 | 422 860 | 111 391 | (92 327) | 2 275 589 |
| Banking activities Other banking interests Liberty |
1 406 815 426 850 |
414 614 8 246 |
107 550 3 841 |
(92 327) | 1 836 652 3 841 435 096 |
| Non-current assets3 | 65 772 | 13 662 | 194 | (77) | 79 551 |
| Banking activities Liberty |
29 078 36 694 |
12 944 718 |
194 | (77) | 42 139 37 412 |
| 20184 Total income2 |
87 099 | 37 599 | 3 578 | (1 223) | 127 053 |
| Banking activities Liberty |
68 737 18 362 |
34 239 3 360 |
3 578 | (1 223) | 105 331 21 722 |
| Total headline earnings | 19 788 | 6 932 | 1 712 | (567) | 27 865 |
| Banking activities Other banking interests Liberty |
17 832 1 956 |
7 288 (356) |
1 294 418 |
(567) | 25 847 418 1 600 |
| Total assets | 1 702 184 | 414 046 | 112 545 | (101 813) | 2 126 962 |
| Banking activities Other banking interests Liberty |
1 295 036 407 148 |
406 419 7 627 |
104 693 7 852 |
(101 813) | 1 704 335 7 852 414 775 |
| Non-current assets3 | 62 920 | 13 276 | 78 | (78) | 76 196 |
| Banking activities Liberty |
26 997 35 923 |
12 518 758 |
78 | (78) | 39 515 36 681 |
1 Eliminations include intersegmental transactions and balances as well as central funding and other.
2 Total income is attributable based on where the operations are located.
3 Non-current assets are assets that are expected to be recovered more than 12 months after the reporting period.
4 Where reporting responsibility for individual cost centres and divisions within business units changes, the segmental analysis' comparative figures are reclassified accordingly.
as at 31 December 2019
| COMPANY | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Note | 2019 Rm |
2018 Rm |
|
| Assets | |||
| Financial investments 45 |
81 | 84 | |
| Other assets | 173 | 170 | |
| Interest in subsidiaries 46 |
90 190 | 80 941 | |
| Interest in associates 47 |
1 233 | 1 065 | |
| Current tax asset | 8 | 12 | |
| Total assets | 91 685 | 82 272 | |
| Equity and liabilities | |||
| Equity | 79 310 | 76 537 | |
| Ordinary share capital and premium 15 |
17 984 | 17 860 | |
| Equity attributable to other equity instrument holders 15 |
10 989 | 9 047 | |
| Reserves | 50 337 | 49 630 | |
| Liabilities | 12 375 | 5 735 | |
| Deferred tax liabilities 48 |
1 | 2 | |
| Subordinated debt 49 |
11 704 | 5 057 | |
| Indebtedness by the company to group subsidiaries 46 |
637 | 619 | |
| Other liabilities | 33 | 57 | |
| Total equity and liabilities | 91 685 | 82 272 |
for the year ended 31 December 2019
| COMPANY | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Note | 2019 Rm |
2018 Rm |
|||
| Interest income | 805 | 350 | |||
| Interest expense | (771) | (286) | |||
| Other income | 50 | 475 | 20 | ||
| Dividends from subsidiaries | 16 999 | 17 751 | |||
| Total income | 17 508 | 17 835 | |||
| Operating expenses | (45) | (33) | |||
| Net income before impairments of investment | 17 463 | 17 802 | |||
| Impairment of investment in subsidiaries | 46 | (2) | (24) | ||
| Net income before equity accounted earnings | 17 461 | 17 778 | |||
| Share of profits from associates and joint ventures | 288 | 289 | |||
| Profit before direct taxation | 17 749 | 18 067 | |||
| Direct taxation | 51 | (236) | (210) | ||
| Profit for the year | 17 513 | 17 857 | |||
| Other comprehensive loss after tax for the year | (6) | (32) | |||
| Net change in fair value of equity financial assets measured at fair value Deferred tax on net fair value adjustment on equity financial assets measured |
45 | (8) | (41) | ||
| at fair value through OCI | 48 | 2 | 9 | ||
| Total comprehensive income | 17 507 | 17 825 | |||
| Attributable to the ordinary shareholder | 16 634 | 17 087 | |||
| Attributable to other equity instrument holders | 873 | 738 |
for the year ended 31 December 2019
| COMPANY | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Note | 2019 Rm |
2018 Rm |
|||
| Net cash flows from operating activities | 17 462 | 17 780 | |||
| Profit before direct taxation Adjusted for non -cash items and other adjustments included in the income statement Decrease in income-earning assets (Decrease)/increase in deposits, trading and other liabilities Interest received Interest paid Dividends received Proceeds on sale of shares in subsidiary |
52 | 17 749 (17 794) (22) 805 (771) 16 999 522 |
18 067 (18 099) 14 3 350 (286) 17 751 |
||
| Taxation received/(paid) | (26) | (20) | |||
| Net cash flows used in from investing activities | (9 209) | (6 675) | |||
| Increase in investment in subsidiaries | 52 | (9 209) | (6 675) | ||
| Net cash flows used in financing activities | (8 253) | (11 105) | |||
| Proceeds from issue of share capital Share buy-backs Issuance of other equity instruments Issuance of subordinated debt Net dividends paid |
52 | 124 1 942 6 647 (16 966) |
320 (523) 5 057 (15 959) |
||
| Net increase in cash and cash equivalents Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of the year |
|||||
| Cash and cash equivalents at end of the year |
for the year ended 31 December 2019
| Note | Share capital and premium Rm |
Share-based payment reserve Rm |
||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Balance at 1 January 2018 Issue of share capital and share premium Repurchase of share capital and share premium Equity-settled share-based payment transactions Vested units transfer to retained earnings Total comprehensive income |
15 15 |
18 063 320 (523) |
4 (4) |
|
| Other comprehensive income Profit for the year |
||||
| Dividends paid Preference share redemption |
||||
| Balance at 31 December 2018 | 17 860 | |||
| Balance at 1 January 20191 Issue of share capital and share premium Repurchase of share capital and share premium Vested units transfer to retained earnings Direct equity movement Total comprehensive income |
15 15 |
17 860 124 |
||
| Total comprehensive income Profit for the year |
||||
| Dividends paid Preference share redemption |
||||
| Balance at 31 December 2019 | 17 984 |
1 The transition to IFRS 16 had no impact on the SBGL equity balances as at 31 December 2018 or 1 January 2019.
| Other equity instrument holders Total Rm Rm |
Ordinary share holders' equity Rm |
Retained earnings Rm |
Fair value through OCI reserve |
Empower ment reserve Rm |
Cash flow hedging reserve Rm |
Revaluation reserve Rm |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 9 047 74 748 320 (523) |
65 701 320 (523) |
43 848 | (9) | (274) | 969 | 3 100 |
| 738 17 825 |
17 087 | 4 17 119 |
(32) | |||
| (32) 738 17 857 |
(32) 17 119 |
17 119 | (32) | |||
| (738) (15 951) 118 |
(15 213) 118 |
(15 221) | 8 118 |
|||
| 9 047 76 537 |
67 490 | 45 750 | (41) | (148) | 969 | 3 100 |
| 9 047 76 537 124 1 942 1 942 |
67 490 124 |
45 750 | (41) | (148) | 969 | 3 100 |
| 18 873 17 507 |
18 16 634 |
18 16 640 |
(6) | |||
| (6) 873 17 513 |
(6) 16 640 |
16 640 | (6) | |||
| (873) (16 966) 148 |
(16 093) 148 |
(16 093) | 148 | |||
| 10 989 79 310 |
68 321 | 46 315 | (47) | 969 | 3 100 |
1 The transition to IFRS 16 had no impact on the SBGL equity balances as at 31 December 2018 or 1 January 2019.
| 2019 Rm |
2018 Rm |
|
|---|---|---|
| Financial investments held in banking activities – unlisted equities | 81 | 84 |
| 2019 Rm |
2018 Rm |
|
|---|---|---|
| Financial investment measured at fair value through OCI Opening balance Fair value adjustments Impairment |
57 (8) |
98 (41) |
| Closing balance | 49 | 57 |
| Financial investment measured at fair value through profit or loss Opening balance Fair value adjustments |
27 5 |
27 |
| Closing balance | 32 | 27 |
| Total | 81 | 84 |
Financial investments comprise of unlisted equities in Unlu Yatarim A.S (4.41%) measured at FVOCI and Business Partners Limited (3.24%) measured at FVTPL. Both investments are classified as level 3 in the fair value hierarchy.
| 2019 Rm |
2018 Rm |
|
|---|---|---|
| Shares at cost | 76 380 | 73 150 |
| Indebtedness to the company (annexure A) | 12 894 | 6 875 |
| Investment through equity-settled share incentives | 916 | 916 |
| Total before indebtedness by the company | 90 190 | 80 941 |
| Indebtedness by the company (annexure A) | (637) | (619) |
| Total | 89 553 | 80 322 |
AFS Principal subsidiaries and investments and related loans are listed in annexure A. For more detail regarding related party transactions, refer to note 42.
Indebtedness to the company are all current assets and have been classified as loans and advances which are measured on an amortised cost basis. These lending exposures are to entities that form part of the group's risk management framework. This is on the basis that the group has governance and oversight of the risk inherent in these entities and ensures that entities operate within the group's risk appetite as approved by the group risk and capital management committee (GRCMC). The ECL has been assessed to be insignificant.
The carrying value approximates fair value and is classified as level 3 in the fair value hierarchy. Changes in the indebtedness during the year include repayments, new loans, interest accruals and exchange rate differences.
Indebtedness by the company are all liabilities repayable on demand and are measured at amortised cost. The carrying value approximates fair value and is classified as level 3 in the fair value hierarchy. Changes in the indebtedness during the year include repayments, new loans, interest accruals and exchange rate differences.
The company's investments in subsidiaries (measured at cost) are reviewed annually for impairment with reference to impairment indicators that include the following:
When impairment indicators exist the recoverable amount of the company's investment in the subsidiary is determined (as the higher of the value in use and fair value less cost to sell). An impairment loss is recognised in profit or loss if the carrying value exceeds the recoverable amount.
During 2019, R2 million (2018: R24 million) impairment losses were recognised on the company's investment in SML Limited. The events and circumstances that led to the recognition of the impairment was that the recoverable amount (being the value in use) of the entity was less than the carrying value.
| 2019 Rm |
2018 Rm |
|
|---|---|---|
| Carrying value at beginning of the year | 1 065 | 913 |
| Direct equity movement | 18 | |
| Share of profit | 288 | 289 |
| Dividend received | (138) | (113) |
| IFRS 9 transition adjustment | (24) | |
| Carrying value at end of the year | 1 233 | 1 065 |
The company's investments in associates include South African Home Loans Proprietary Limited.
Refer to annexure B for details on associates.
| 2019 Rm |
2018 Rm |
|
|---|---|---|
| Deferred tax reconciliation Deferred tax liability at the beginning of the year Adding/(reversing) temporary difference for the year |
(2) 1 |
(5) 3 |
| Deferred tax on equity financial asset reserve recognised in OCI Fair value adjustment – recognised in profit or loss |
2 (1) |
9 (6) |
| Deferred tax liability at end of the year | (1) | (2) |
| Redeemable/payable date | First callable date | Nominal value1 Million |
Carrying value1 2019 Rm |
Carrying value 2018 Rm |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SBT201 | 13 February 2028 | 13 February 2023 | ZAR3 000 | 3 040 | 3 041 |
| SBT202 | 3 December 2028 | 3 December 2023 | ZAR1 516 | 1 527 | 1 528 |
| SBT203 | 3 December 2028 | 3 December 2023 | ZAR484 | 488 | 488 |
| SBT204 | 16 April 2029 | 16 April 2024 | ZAR1 000 | 1 020 | |
| SBT205 | 31 May 2029 | 31 May 2024 | USD400 | 5 629 | |
| Total | 11 704 | 5 057 |
1 The difference between the carrying amount and nominal value represents accrued interest.
For SBG group, these subordinated bonds are hedged items classified as fair value hedges, interest rate swaps are the derivatives designated as the hedging instruments for these hedge relationships. However, for SBG company (the company), these bonds do not qualify for hedge accounting as the company does not hold derivative instruments.
Subordinated debt is measured on an amortised cost basis and is classified as level 2 in the fair value hierarchy, with a fair value of R11.8 billion (2018: R5.5 billion).
| Within one to five years2 |
||
|---|---|---|
| 2019 Rm |
2018 Rm |
|
| Subordinated debt – discounted Subordinated debt – undiscounted |
11 704 14 468 |
5 057 5 965 |
2 The maturity analysis for subordinated debt has been determined as the earlier of the contractual repayment date or the option by the issuer to redeem the debt.
| 2019 Rm |
2018 Rm |
|
|---|---|---|
| Foreign exchange gains and other | (7) | |
| Unrealised gains on financial instruments | 5 | 27 |
| Profit on the sale of shares | 470 | |
| Total | 475 | 20 |
| 2019 Rm |
2018 Rm |
|
|---|---|---|
| Current year | ||
| South African normal tax | 209 | 147 |
| Deferred tax charge | (1) | 6 |
| Foreign and withholding taxes | 28 | 55 |
| Prior years | ||
| South African normal tax prior year under provision | 2 | |
| Total direct taxation recognised in statement of comprehensive income | 236 | 210 |
| South African tax rate reconciliation (%) | ||
| Direct tax – statutory rate | 28.0 | 28.0 |
| Direct tax – current year | 28 | 28.0 |
| Withholding tax | 0.2 | 0.3 |
| Direct tax – current year – normal | 28.2 | 28.3 |
| Permanent differences | (27.1) | (27.1) |
| Dividends received | (26.0) | (26.8) |
| Other non-taxable income | (0.6) | 0.1 |
| Equity accounted earnings | (0.5) | (0.4) |
| Direct effective tax rate1 | 1.1 | 1.2 |
1 Expressed as a percentage of profit before direct tax.
| 2019 Rm |
2018 Rm |
|
|---|---|---|
| Dividends received | (16 999) | (17 751) |
| Interest income | (805) | (350) |
| Interest expense | 771 | 286 |
| Share of profits from associates and joint ventures | (288) | (289) |
| Profit on sale of shares in subsidiary | (470) | |
| Impairment of investment in subsidiary | 2 | 24 |
| Unrealised gains on financial instruments | (5) | (27) |
| Foreign exchange gains and losses | 8 | |
| Total | (17 794) | (18 099) |
| 2019 Rm |
2018 Rm |
|
|---|---|---|
| Increase in investment in subsidiaries Movement in indebtness |
(3 208) (6 001) |
(1 712) (4 963) |
| Total | (9 209) | (6 675) |
| 2019 Rm |
2018 Rm |
|
|---|---|---|
| Balance at the beginning of the year Subordinated debt issue |
5 057 6 647 |
5 057 |
| Balance at the end of the year | 11 704 | 5 057 |
Other assets and liabilities consist mainly of non-financial assets and liabilities which are not subject to liquidity, credit and market risk.
The diagram depicts principal subsidiaries only. A full list of the group's subsidiaries and consolidated structured entities is available at the company's registered office. The holding in subsidiaries is 100% unless otherwise indicated.




The diagram above depicts principal subsidiaries only. A full list of the group's subsidiaries and consolidated structured entities is available at the company's registered office. The holding in subsidiaries is 100% unless otherwise indicated. The holding in subsidiaries is 100% unless otherwise indicated.
| Nominal share | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Nature of operation | capital issued Rm |
||
| Standard Bank Group Limited will ensure that the capital adequacy of its subsidiaries denoted by # will meet the requirements of home and host regulators, as required by section 70(A) of the South African Banks Act. |
|||
| Banking subsidiaries | |||
| Stanbic Bank Botswana Limited (Botswana)1# | Commercial bank | 423 | |
| Stanbic Bank Ghana Limited (Ghana)1# | Commercial bank | 630 | |
| Stanbic Bank Kenya Limited (Kenya)1# | Commercial bank | 423 | |
| Stanbic Bank S.A. (Côte d'Ivoire)1# | Commercial bank | 974 | |
| Stanbic Bank Tanzania Limited (Tanzania)1, 3# | Commercial bank | 50 | |
| Stanbic Bank Zambia Limited (Zambia)1, 3# | Commercial bank | 660 | |
| Stanbic Bank Zimbabwe Limited (Zimbabwe)#* | Commercial bank | 2 | |
| Stanbic Bank Uganda Limited (Uganda)1# | Commercial bank | 227 | |
| Stanbic IBTC Bank PLC (Nigeria)1# | Commercial bank | 111 | |
| Standard Bank de Angola S.A. (Angola)# | Commercial bank | 768 | |
| Standard Bank Isle of Man Limited (Isle of Man)1# | Merchant bank | 25 | |
| Standard Bank Jersey Limited (Jersey)1# | Merchant bank | 454 | |
| Standard Bank PLC (Malawi)1, 4# | Commercial bank | 23 | |
| Standard Bank (Mauritius) Limited (Mauritius)1# | Commercial bank | 342 | |
| Standard Bank Namibia Limited (Namibia)1, 5# | Commercial bank | 2 | |
| Standard Bank RDC (S.A.) (DRC)1, 3# | Commercial bank | 944 | |
| Standard Bank S.A. (Mozambique)1# | Commercial bank | 309 | |
| Standard Bank Eswatini Limited (Eswatini)# | Commercial bank | 15 | |
| Standard Lesotho Bank Limited (Lesotho)# | Commercial bank | 21 | |
| The Standard Bank of South Africa Limited# | Commercial bank | 60 |
2018 Rm
Refer to footnotes on the following page.
The only legal exchange mechanism that SBZ had access to in the financial period since the change in functional currency from USD to ZWL, on 1 October 2018, ZWL was the official exchange mechanism. This led to SBZ concluding that the appropriate exchange rate to use at the date of the change in functional currency and subsequent to the change in functional currency up until the end of the 2018 reporting period was the official rate of 1:1.
RBZ implemented certain key monetary policy measures during February 2019. The most significant change was the establishment of a new foreign exchange interbank market and this interbank market will complement the existing official foreign exchange mechanism with the RBZ. The establishment of this interbank market has created an additional legal exchange mechanism whereby the bank is able to trade RTGS dollars (official currency). The starting rate of trade in this interbank market was 2.5 RTGS:USD. As at 31 December 2019, the rate deteriorated to 16.54 RTGS:USD from 1 RTGS:USD as at 31 December 2018, which resulted in a FCTR loss of R2.5 billion for the group, after the hyperinflation adjustment translation adjustment per IAS 21 .
During 2019, the Zimbabwe year-on-year monthly inflation rate increased from 42% at the end of December 2018 to 521% at the end of December 2019. Therefore, SBZ is considered to be hyperinflationary and the results for SBZ were adjusted in accordance with IAS 29. This resulted in the group's profit attributable to ordinary shareholders for the period ended 31 December 2019 decreasing by R82 million and an increase in retained earnings of R730 million. The consumer price index at the beginning of the reporting period was 98%, and closed at 552%.
| Non-controlling | |
|---|---|
| Effective holding2 interest Book value of shares |
Net indebtedness |
| 2019 2018 2019 2018 2019 2018 |
2019 2018 |
| % % % % Rm Rm |
Rm Rm |
| 100 100 |
|
| 99 99 1 1 |
|
| 69 69 31 31 |
|
| 100 100 |
|
| 100 100 |
|
| 100 100 |
|
| 100 100 136 136 |
|
| 80 80 20 20 |
|
| 66 65 34 35 |
|
| 51 51 49 49 359 359 |
139 130 |
| 100 100 |
|
| 100 100 |
|
| 60 60 40 40 |
|
| 100 100 |
|
| 84 100 16 100 100 |
|
| 98 98 2 2 |
|
| 72 72 28 28 94 94 |
|
| 80 80 20 20 13 13 |
|
| 100 100 50 541 47 799 |
12 070 6 158 |
| 51 143 48 401 |
12 209 6 288 |
The only legal exchange mechanism that SBZ had access to in the financial period since the change in functional currency from USD to ZWL, on 1 October 2018, ZWL was the official exchange mechanism. This led to SBZ concluding that the appropriate exchange rate to use at the date of the change in functional currency and subsequent to the change in functional currency up until the end of the 2018
RBZ implemented certain key monetary policy measures during February 2019. The most significant change was the establishment of a new foreign exchange interbank market and this interbank market will complement the existing official foreign exchange mechanism with the RBZ. The establishment of this interbank market has created an additional legal exchange mechanism whereby the bank is able to trade RTGS dollars (official currency). The starting rate of trade in this interbank market was 2.5 RTGS:USD. As at 31 December 2019, the rate deteriorated to 16.54 RTGS:USD from 1 RTGS:USD as at 31 December 2018, which resulted in a FCTR loss of R2.5 billion for
During 2019, the Zimbabwe year-on-year monthly inflation rate increased from 42% at the end of December 2018 to 521% at the end of December 2019. Therefore, SBZ is considered to be hyperinflationary and the results for SBZ were adjusted in accordance with IAS 29.
by R82 million and an increase in retained earnings of R730 million. The consumer price index at the beginning of the reporting period
This resulted in the group's profit attributable to ordinary shareholders for the period ended 31 December 2019 decreasing
.
Refer to footnotes on the following page.
reporting period was the official rate of 1:1.
was 98%, and closed at 552%.
* Stanbic Bank Zimbabwe functional currency
the group, after the hyperinflation adjustment translation adjustment per IAS 21
| Nominal share |
|||
|---|---|---|---|
| Nature of operation | capital issued | ||
| Non-banking subsidiaries | |||
| Development and marketing | |||
| transactions – switching software | |||
| Ecentric Payment Systems Proprietary Limited1 | and services | ||
| Liberty Group Limited1 | Insurance company | 29 | |
| Liberty Holdings Limited4 | Insurance holding company | 26 | |
| Liberty Two Degrees Limited1, 6 | Real Estate Investment trust | ||
| Melville Douglas Investment Management Proprietary Limited# | Asset and portfolio management | ||
| SBG Securities Proprietary Limited# | Stockbrokers | ||
| SBN Holdings Limited (Namibia)4, 5 | Bank holding company | 1 | |
| Stanbic Africa Holdings Limited (UK) | Investment holding company | 1 494 | |
| Stanbic Holdings Ghana Limited7 | Holding company | 30 | |
| Stanbic Holdings PLC (Kenya)1, 4 | Bank holding company | 232 | |
| Stanbic IBTC Holdings PLC (Nigeria)1, 4 | Bank holding company | 284 | |
| Stanbic Uganda Holdings Limited (Uganda)4 | Bank holding company | 227 | |
| Standard Advisory (China) Limited (China) | Trading company | 8 | |
| Standard Advisory London Limited (UK) | Arranging and advisory company | 1 | |
| Standard Bank Group International Limited (Isle of Man) | Investment holding company | ||
| Standard Bank International Investments Limited (Jersey)1# | Investment service provider | ||
| Standard Bank London Holdings Limited (UK) | Investment holding company | 6 337 | |
| Standard Bank Offshore Group Limited (Jersey) | Investment holding company | 17 | |
| Standard Bank Offshore Trust Company Jersey Limited (Jersey)1# | Trust company | 6 | |
| Standard Bank Trust Company (Mauritius) Limited (Mauritius)1# | Trust company | ||
| Standard Finance Limited (Isle of Man)1# | Finance company | ||
| Standard Insurance Limited | Short-term insurance | 15 | |
| Standard New York, Inc (US) | Securities broker/dealer | 55 | |
| Standard Trust Limited2# | Trust company | ||
| STANLIB Limited1 | Wealth and asset management | ||
| Miscellaneous | Finance companies | ||
| Total non-banking subsidiaries |
Effective holding
Non-controlling
interest Book value of shares Net indebtedness
1 Held indirectly, no book value in Standard Bank Group Limited.
2 Effective holding company comprises direct and indirect holdings.
3 Minorities or nominee shareholders hold 0.5% or less.
4 Listed on a stock exchange.
5 Following the listing of SBN Holdings Limited on the Namibian Stock Exchange in November 2019, Standard Bank Group Limited legally owns 74.9% (2018: 90%) but consolidates 84.47% (2018: 100%) of SBN Holdings Limited's attributable earnings due to the degree of control over the empowerment structure. Refer to page 135 for further detail on the change in holding post 31 December 2019.
6 Effective shareholding represents Liberty Group's direct shareholding.
7 Established in 2019.
The nominal share capital issued of foreign subsidiaries has been stated in the above table at their rand equivalents at the rates of exchange ruling on the dates of the provision of capital. The country of incorporation is South Africa unless otherwise indicated.
While a full list of the group's subsidiaries and consolidated structured entities is available at the company's registered office, the above disclosures include subsidiaries for which either of the following is present:
No significant restrictions exist on the transfer of funds and capital within the group, subject to compliance with the corporate laws of relevant jurisdictions and appropriate motivation to, and approval by, exchange control authorities.
| Non-controlling | |
|---|---|
| Effective holding interest Book value of shares |
Net indebtedness |
| 2019 2018 2019 2018 2019 2018 |
2019 2018 |
| Rm Rm Rm Rm Rm Rm |
Rm Rm |
| 54 100 46 |
|
| 54 54 46 46 |
|
| 54 54 46 46 7 668 7 668 |
|
| 58 59 41 |
|
| 100 100 53 53 |
|
| 100 100 320 320 |
|
| 84 100 16 348 400 |
84 |
| 100 100 8 064 7 416 |
119 |
| 100 | |
| 69 69 31 31 |
|
| 66 65 35 |
|
| 80 20 |
|
| 100 100 10 10 |
|
| 100 100 557 557 |
|
| 100 100 308 425 |
|
| 100 100 |
|
| 100 100 7 658 7 658 |
|
| 100 100 49 49 100 100 |
|
| 100 100 |
|
| 100 100 |
|
| 100 100 30 30 |
|
| 100 100 55 55 |
|
| 100 100 |
|
| 54 54 46 46 |
|
| 135 108 |
(71) (116) |
| 25 255 24 749 |
48 (32) |
| 76 398 73 150 |
12 257 6 256 |
5 Following the listing of SBN Holdings Limited on the Namibian Stock Exchange in November 2019, Standard Bank Group Limited legally owns 74.9% (2018: 90%) but consolidates 84.47% (2018: 100%) of SBN Holdings Limited's attributable earnings due to the degree of control over the empowerment structure. Refer
While a full list of the group's subsidiaries and consolidated structured entities is available at the company's registered office, the above
No significant restrictions exist on the transfer of funds and capital within the group, subject to compliance with the corporate laws
The nominal share capital issued of foreign subsidiaries has been stated in the above table at their rand equivalents at the rates of exchange ruling on the dates of the provision of capital. The country of incorporation is South Africa unless otherwise indicated.
1 Held indirectly, no book value in Standard Bank Group Limited. 2 Effective holding company comprises direct and indirect holdings. 3 Minorities or nominee shareholders hold 0.5% or less.
6 Effective shareholding represents Liberty Group's direct shareholding.
to page 135 for further detail on the change in holding post 31 December 2019.
disclosures include subsidiaries for which either of the following is present:
• there is net indebtedness to/from Standard Bank Group Limited.
• Standard Bank Group Limited has provided a capital adequacy statement (denoted by #)
• there is a net book value as recorded in Standard Bank Group Limited's financial statements
of relevant jurisdictions and appropriate motivation to, and approval by, exchange control authorities.
4 Listed on a stock exchange.
• there is a non-controlling interest
7 Established in 2019.
| Nature of the operations | Amount of support provided as at1, 2, 3 |
Type of support4 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Name of the entity |
2019 Rm |
2018 Rm |
2019 Rm |
2018 Rm |
||
| Blue Granite Investments No. 2 (RF) Proprietary Limited (BG2) |
Facilitates mortgage-backed securitisations. The group is the primary liquidity facility provider to BG2. |
26 | 28 | Subordinated loan |
Subordinated loan |
|
| Blue Granite Investments No. 3 (RF) Proprietary Limited (BG3) |
Facilitates mortgage-backed securitisations. The group is the primary liquidity facility provider to BG3. |
59 | 59 | Subordinated loan |
Subordinated loan |
|
| Blue Granite Investments No. 4 (RF) Proprietary Limited (BG4) |
Facilitates mortgage-backed securitisations. The group is the primary liquidity facility provider to BG4. |
18 | 18 | Subordinated loan |
Subordinated loan |
|
| Siyakha Fund (RF) Limited (Siyakha) |
Facilitates mortgage-backed securitisations. The group is the primary liquidity facility provider to Siyakha. |
501 | 501 | Subordinated loan |
Subordinated loan |
|
| Blue Shield Investments 01 (RF) Limited |
Facilitates mortgage-backed securitisations. The group is the primary liquidity facility provider to Blue Shield 01. |
504 | 504 | Subordinated loan |
Subordinated loan |
|
| (Blue Shield 01) | 16 158 | 16 162 | Mortgage- backed notes |
Mortgage backed notes |
Terms of contractual arrangements that require the group to provide financial support to the SE
and expenses.
and expenses.
and expenses.
income and expenses.
is 21 November 2024.
The loan does not have a fixed term or repayment date. Payment of interest will be determined on interest payment date at the lower of cash available or an amount calculated such that the rate will be equal to prime plus 5% or an amount equal to the notional net income as reflected in the management accounts, after taking into account all income
The loan does not have a fixed term or repayment date. Payment of interest will be determined on interest payment date at the lower of cash available or an amount calculated such that the rate will be equal to prime plus 5% or an amount equal to the notional net income as reflected in the management accounts, after taking into account all income
The loan does not have a fixed term or repayment date. Payment of interest will be determined on interest payment date at the lower of cash available or an amount calculated such that the rate will be equal to prime plus 5% or an amount equal to the notional net income as reflected in the management accounts, after taking into account all income
The loan does not have a fixed term or repayment date. Payment of interest will be determined on interest payment date at the lower of cash available or an amount calculated such that the rate will be equal to prime plus 5% or an amount equal to the notional net income reflected in the management accounts, after taking into account all
The subordinated loan is provided by the group. Interest is charged at the lower of prime plus 10% or net profit after
The group holds class A1, A2, A3 and C notes. Interest for the different classes of notes accrues at the three-month JIBAR rate plus a margin ranging between 1.55% and 4.00%. Interest is payable quarterly. The notes' maturity date
tax or cash balance available in Blue Shield 01.
Events/circumstances that could expose the group to a loss as a result of the contractual arrangement
be classified as non-performing.
be classified as non-performing.
be classified as non-performing.
Should BG 2's customers be unable to meet their contractual obligations under the mortgage loan agreement and the loans
Should BG 3's customers be unable to meet their contractual obligations under the mortgage loan agreement and the loans
Should BG 4's customers be unable to meet their contractual obligations under the mortgage loan agreement and the loans
Should Siyakha's customers be unable to meet their contractual obligations under the mortgage loan agreement
Should Blue Shield 01's customers be unable to meet their contractual obligations under the mortgage loan agreement
and the loans be classified as non-performing.
and the loans be classified as non-performing.
Refer to footnotes on the following page.
| Terms of contractual arrangements that require the group to provide financial support to the SE |
Events/circumstances that could expose the group to a loss as a result of the contractual arrangement |
|---|---|
| The loan does not have a fixed term or repayment date. Payment of interest will be determined on interest payment date at the lower of cash available or an amount calculated such that the rate will be equal to prime plus 5% or an amount equal to the notional net income as reflected in the management accounts, after taking into account all income and expenses. |
Should BG 2's customers be unable to meet their contractual obligations under the mortgage loan agreement and the loans be classified as non-performing. |
| The loan does not have a fixed term or repayment date. Payment of interest will be determined on interest payment date at the lower of cash available or an amount calculated such that the rate will be equal to prime plus 5% or an amount equal to the notional net income as reflected in the management accounts, after taking into account all income and expenses. |
Should BG 3's customers be unable to meet their contractual obligations under the mortgage loan agreement and the loans be classified as non-performing. |
| The loan does not have a fixed term or repayment date. Payment of interest will be determined on interest payment date at the lower of cash available or an amount calculated such that the rate will be equal to prime plus 5% or an amount equal to the notional net income as reflected in the management accounts, after taking into account all income and expenses. |
Should BG 4's customers be unable to meet their contractual obligations under the mortgage loan agreement and the loans be classified as non-performing. |
| The loan does not have a fixed term or repayment date. Payment of interest will be determined on interest payment date at the lower of cash available or an amount calculated such that the rate will be equal to prime plus 5% or an amount equal to the notional net income reflected in the management accounts, after taking into account all income and expenses. |
Should Siyakha's customers be unable to meet their contractual obligations under the mortgage loan agreement and the loans be classified as non-performing. |
| The subordinated loan is provided by the group. Interest is charged at the lower of prime plus 10% or net profit after tax or cash balance available in Blue Shield 01. |
Should Blue Shield 01's customers be unable to meet their contractual obligations under the mortgage loan agreement and the loans be classified as non-performing. |
| The group holds class A1, A2, A3 and C notes. Interest for the different classes of notes accrues at the three-month JIBAR rate plus a margin ranging between 1.55% and 4.00%. Interest is payable quarterly. The notes' maturity date is 21 November 2024. |
Consolidated structured entities
Amount of support provided
2019 Rm
as at1, 2, 3 Type of support4
2019 Rm
loan
loan
loan
loan
loan
backed notes
2018 Rm
Subordinated loan
Subordinated loan
Subordinated loan
Subordinated loan
Subordinated loan
Mortgagebacked notes
2018 Rm
26 28 Subordinated
59 59 Subordinated
18 18 Subordinated
501 501 Subordinated
504 504 Subordinated
16 158 16 162 Mortgage-
the entity Nature of the operations
Facilitates mortgage-backed
Facilitates mortgage-backed
Facilitates mortgage-backed
Facilitates mortgage-backed
Facilitates mortgage-backed
securitisations. The group is the primary liquidity facility provider to BG2.
securitisations. The group is the primary liquidity facility provider to BG3.
securitisations. The group is the primary liquidity facility provider to BG4.
securitisations. The group is the primary liquidity facility provider to Siyakha.
securitisations. The group is the primary liquidity facility provider to Blue Shield 01.
Name of
Blue Granite Investments No. 2 (RF) Proprietary Limited (BG2)
Blue Granite Investments No. 3 (RF) Proprietary Limited (BG3)
Blue Granite Investments No. 4 (RF) Proprietary Limited (BG4)
Siyakha Fund (RF) Limited (Siyakha)
Blue Shield Investments 01 (RF) Limited (Blue Shield 01)
Refer to footnotes on the following page.
| Name of the entity |
Amount of support provided as at1, 2, 3 |
Type of support4 | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nature of the operations | 2019 Rm |
2018 Rm |
2019 Rm |
2018 Rm |
|||
| Blue Shield Investments 02 (RF) Limited (Blue Shield 02) |
Facilitates mortgage-backed securitisations. The group is the primary liquidity facility provider to Blue Shield 02. |
1 816 | 1 350 | Subordinated loan |
Subordinated loan |
||
| 30 709 | 30 708 | Mortgage- backed notes |
Mortgage backed notes |
||||
| Blue Banner Securitisation Vehicle RC1 Proprietary Limited (Blue Banner) |
Originates mortgage loans on behalf of group. The group is required to provide the funding for these mortgage loans. |
7 | 88 | Bridging finance |
Bridging finance |
||
| Rapvest Investment Proprietary Limited |
Facilitates finance deals for other group companies and third-parties through preference share investments and loans to clients. |
6 902 | 9 790 | Loan | Loan | ||
| DAF Financial Services (RF) Proprietary Limited |
The structure is an asset-backed funding solution. The financial assets, the truck finance receivables, are transferred to DFS and funding is provided by Standard Bank on a limited-recourse basis secured by the receivables. |
234 | 301 | Loan | Loan | ||
| Main Street 367 (RF) Proprietary Limited |
Facilitates funding to BG1, BG2, BG3, BG4 and Siyakha. SB Debtors (a subsidiary of Standard Bank Group) provides the funding to Mainstreet to originate the loans. |
222 | 210 | Subordinated loan |
Subordinated loan |
||
| Blue Diamond Investments No. 3 (RF) Limited (BD)3 |
The group issues notes to Blue Diamond Investments No. 3 (BD), then BD obtains credit protection from third-party investors by issuing notes to third-party investors on single or multiple corporate names. The notes issued by BD are held by Liberty. |
203 | 206 | Credit-linked notes |
Credit-linked notes |
The group holds the notes issued by (BD)3. The group settles BD's operating expenses as and when necessary, typically in the event that BD has liquidity constraints. Any payment for such amounts is to be refunded by BD to the group.
Events/circumstances that could expose the group to a loss as a result of the contractual arrangement
Should Blue Shield 02's customers be unable to meet their contractual obligations under the mortgage loan agreement
Should Blue Banner's customers be unable to meet their contractual obligations under the mortgage loan agreement
In the event that the underlying assets are classified as
SBSA is exposed to the first-loss risk in the structure, as well as potential losses that may be incurred on the receivables as a result of residual asset value risk. The residual asset value risk is, however, limited due to a put option that is in place.
In the event that customers of BG1, BG2, BG3, BG4 and Siyakha are unable to meet their contractual obligations under the mortgage loan agreement and their loans are classified as
In the event of a credit event, the group will suffer a loss. The group is also exposed to the risk of loss should it be unable to recover any unexpected operating expenses from (BD)3.
and the loans be classified as non-performing.
and the loans are classified as non-performing.
non-performing loans.
non-performing.
1 The amount of support provided includes loans and advances and drawn down credit facilities provided to SEs by the group.
2 During the reporting period, the group did not provide any financial or other support to any subsidiary without having a contractual obligation to do so.
3 This is the amount as reported on the balance sheet as at 31 December 2019 and 2018, respectively.
4 In addition to the financial support provided to the SEs, the group enters into other transactions with SEs in the ordinary course of business. These transactions include loans and advances, deposits and current accounts and derivatives.
| Terms of contractual arrangements that require the group to provide financial support to the SE |
Events/circumstances that could expose the group to a loss as a result of the contractual arrangement |
||
|---|---|---|---|
| The subordinated loan is provided by the group. Interest is charged at 11%. |
Should Blue Shield 02's customers be unable to meet their contractual obligations under the mortgage loan agreement and the loans be classified as non-performing. |
||
| The group holds class A1, A2, B and C notes. Interest for the different classes of notes accrues at prime rate less a margin ranging between 1% and 1.9%. Interest is payable quarterly. The notes' maturity date is 1 December 2055. |
|||
| The loan does not have a fixed term or repayment date. Any profits in Blue Banner are paid out as interest to the group. |
Should Blue Banner's customers be unable to meet their contractual obligations under the mortgage loan agreement and the loans are classified as non-performing. |
||
| The loan is payable on demand. No interest is charged on the loan. |
In the event that the underlying assets are classified as non-performing loans. |
||
| The loan bears interest at a rate of prime plus 1%. The maturity date of the loan is 30 September 2023. |
SBSA is exposed to the first-loss risk in the structure, as well as potential losses that may be incurred on the receivables as a result of residual asset value risk. The residual asset value risk is, however, limited due to a put option that is in place. |
||
| The loan is only repayable to the extent that Mainstreet receives payment from BG1, BG2, BG3, BG4 and Siyakha. The interest is charged at the higher of JIBAR plus 10% and the cash available in terms of Mainstreet's priority of payments less R15 000. |
In the event that customers of BG1, BG2, BG3, BG4 and Siyakha are unable to meet their contractual obligations under the mortgage loan agreement and their loans are classified as non-performing. |
||
| The group holds the notes issued by (BD)3. The group settles BD's operating expenses as and when necessary, typically in the event that BD has liquidity constraints. Any payment for such amounts is to be refunded by BD to the group. |
In the event of a credit event, the group will suffer a loss. The group is also exposed to the risk of loss should it be unable to recover any unexpected operating expenses from (BD)3. |
Name of
Blue Shield Investments 02 (RF) Limited (Blue Shield 02)
Blue Banner Securitisation Vehicle RC1 Proprietary Limited (Blue Banner)
Rapvest Investment Proprietary Limited
DAF Financial Services (RF) Proprietary Limited
Main Street 367 (RF) Proprietary Limited
Blue Diamond Investments No. 3 (RF) Limited (BD)3
the entity Nature of the operations
02.
to clients.
the loans.
by Liberty.
include loans and advances, deposits and current accounts and derivatives.
by the receivables.
Facilitates mortgage-backed
securitisations. The group is the primary liquidity facility provider to Blue Shield
Originates mortgage loans on behalf of group. The group is required to provide the funding for these mortgage loans.
Facilitates finance deals for other group companies and third-parties through preference share investments and loans
The structure is an asset-backed funding solution. The financial assets, the truck finance receivables, are transferred to DFS and funding is provided by Standard Bank on a limited-recourse basis secured
Facilitates funding to BG1, BG2, BG3, BG4 and Siyakha. SB Debtors (a subsidiary of Standard Bank Group) provides the funding to Mainstreet to originate
The group issues notes to Blue Diamond Investments No. 3 (BD), then BD obtains credit protection from third-party investors by issuing notes to third-party investors on single or multiple corporate names. The notes issued by BD are held
3 This is the amount as reported on the balance sheet as at 31 December 2019 and 2018, respectively.
1 The amount of support provided includes loans and advances and drawn down credit facilities provided to SEs by the group.
2 During the reporting period, the group did not provide any financial or other support to any subsidiary without having a contractual obligation to do so.
4 In addition to the financial support provided to the SEs, the group enters into other transactions with SEs in the ordinary course of business. These transactions
Amount of support provided
as at1, 2, 3 Type of support4
The group has an interest in the following unconsolidated structured entities:
| Name of the entity | Nature and purpose of entity | Principal nature of funding |
Principal nature of assets |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blue Diamond Investments No. 1 (RF) Limited (BD)1 Blue Diamond Investments No. 2 (RF) Limited (BD)2 |
These structures have been designed to provide third-party investors indirect exposure to corporate names. The group obtains credit protection from Blue Diamond Investments No. 1 and No. 2 (RF) Limited (BD) in the form of issuing credit-linked notes on single or multiple corporate names. BD then obtains credit protection from third-party investors by issuing notes to third-party investors on single or multiple corporate names. |
Credit-linked notes issued to third-party investors |
Credit-linked notes issued by the group |
|
| Blue Diamonds X (RF) Limited |
Loans purchased from SBSA and the issuance of notes to third-party investors. |
Commercial paper issued to third-party investors |
Loans and advances to various counterparties |
|
| Africa ETF Issuer Limited offering the following: • AfricaPalladium ETF (JSE code: ETFPLD) • AfricaPlatinum ETF (JSE code: ETFPLT) • AfricaGold ETF (JSE code: ETFGLD) • AfricaRhodium ETF (JSE code: ETFRHO) |
The palladium, platinum, gold and rhodium exchange traded funds (ETFs) have been established for investors to participate in changes in the spot price of underlying commodities. The ETFs issue debentures to investors with each debenture backed by the respective physical commodity. On issuance each debenture is based on 1/100th of a troy ounce of the respective commodity. The physical commodities are stored at recognised custodian storage vaults in London. The ETFs are denominated in rands and are classified as domestic assets. The ETFs are regulated by the Financial Markets Act and the JSE's Listings Requirements. |
The unconsolidated structured entity is funded by the issue of non-interest bearing debentures that are 100% backed by the underlying physical commodity |
Physical commodities (palladium, platinum, gold and Rhodium) |
|
| Calibre Mortgage Fund (Pty) Ltd |
Special Purpose Entity (SPV) set up by South African Home Loans (Pty) Ltd (SAHL) into which it originates home loans. The SPV is funded by debt provided by Liberty and equity provided by SAHL. |
Debt funders in the securitisation market |
Senior secured loan | |
| Greenhouse Funding 3 (Pty) Ltd |
A structured entity set up by Nedbank Limited. It is a securitisation vehicle into which it originates home loans, and into which Liberty can lend on a secured basis. Equity is provided by Nedbank Limited. |
Debt funders in the securitisation market |
Residential mortgage backed securitisation |
|
| SA Taxi Finance Solutions (Pty) Ltd |
SPV set up by SA Taxi to raise debt funding which it in turn uses to originate taxi loans. |
Debt funders in the securitisation market |
Senior, unrated debentures secured by underlying assets |
|
| Universal Credit S.A. | Investment fund | Debt funders in the securitisation market |
Segregated investment fund |
Events/circumstances that could expose the group to a loss
In the event of a credit event, the thirdparty investors will suffer a loss. The group is only exposed to the risk of loss should it be unable to recover any unexpected operating expenses from BD.
The maximum exposure to loss is limited to the on-balance sheet position held by the group through acting as a committed market maker for the ETFs. This exposes the group to the commodity price risk associated with the underlying
in accordance with the group's market
commodity and is managed
To the extent that asset quality
To the extent that asset quality in the vehicle deteriorates to a level where losses exceed subordinated debt in the capital structure, the group may
be exposed to a credit loss.
be exposed to a credit loss.
exposed to a credit loss.
pool of credit assets, the group may be
To the extent that asset quality in the vehicle deteriorates to a level where losses exceed subordinated debt in the capital structure, the group may
exposed to a credit loss.
in the vehicle deteriorates to a level where losses exceed subordinated debt in the capital structure, the group may be
risk management policy.
None
Undated The group established these structured
expenses as and when necessary, typically in the event that BD has liquidity constraints. Any payment for such amounts is to be refunded by BD
and identifies and invests in suitable financial assets and facilitates the execution and settlement of trades.
The loan tenor is five years In the event of defaults in the underlying
entities to accommodate client requirements to hold investments in specific commodity assets. The group manages the ETFs and also provides liquidity to the ETFs by acting as a committed market maker.
| Terms of contractual arrangements | Events/circumstances that could expose the group to a loss |
|||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 12 years | The group settles BD's operating expenses as and when necessary, typically in the event that BD has liquidity constraints. Any payment for such amounts is to be refunded by BD to the group. |
In the event of a credit event, the third party investors will suffer a loss. The group is only exposed to the risk of loss should it be unable to recover any unexpected operating expenses from BD. |
||
| 15 years | SBSA acts as the administrator and identifies and invests in suitable financial assets and facilitates the execution and settlement of trades. |
None | ||
| Undated | The group established these structured entities to accommodate client requirements to hold investments in specific commodity assets. The group manages the ETFs and also provides liquidity to the ETFs by acting as a committed market maker. |
The maximum exposure to loss is limited to the on-balance sheet position held by the group through acting as a committed market maker for the ETFs. This exposes the group to the commodity price risk associated with the underlying commodity and is managed in accordance with the group's market risk management policy. |
||
| The loan tenor is 20 years and bears interest at an average rate of three month JIBAR + 2.30% The loan tenor is five years and bears interest at an average rate of three month JIBAR + 1.69% The loan tenor is five years and bears interest at an average rate of three month JIBAR + 3.43% The loan tenor is five years |
To the extent that asset quality in the vehicle deteriorates to a level where losses exceed subordinated debt in the capital structure, the group may be exposed to a credit loss. |
|||
| To the extent that asset quality in the vehicle deteriorates to a level where losses exceed subordinated debt in the capital structure, the group may be exposed to a credit loss. |
||||
| To the extent that asset quality in the vehicle deteriorates to a level where losses exceed subordinated debt in the capital structure, the group may be exposed to a credit loss. |
||||
| In the event of defaults in the underlying pool of credit assets, the group may be exposed to a credit loss. |
Unconsolidated structured entities
Blue Diamond Investments No. 1 (RF) Limited (BD)1 Blue Diamond Investments No. 2 (RF) Limited (BD)2
Blue Diamonds X (RF)
Africa ETF Issuer Limited offering the following: • AfricaPalladium ETF (JSE code: ETFPLD) • AfricaPlatinum ETF (JSE code: ETFPLT) • AfricaGold ETF (JSE code: ETFGLD) • AfricaRhodium ETF (JSE code: ETFRHO)
Calibre Mortgage Fund
Greenhouse Funding 3
SA Taxi Finance Solutions
(Pty) Ltd
(Pty) Ltd
(Pty) Ltd
Limited
Name of the entity Nature and purpose of entity
The group has an interest in the following unconsolidated structured entities:
These structures have been designed to provide third-party investors indirect exposure to corporate names. The group obtains credit protection from Blue Diamond Investments No. 1 and No. 2 (RF) Limited (BD) in the form of issuing credit-linked notes on single or multiple corporate names. BD then obtains credit protection from third-party investors by issuing notes to third-party investors
Loans purchased from SBSA and the issuance of
The palladium, platinum, gold and rhodium exchange traded funds (ETFs) have been established for investors to participate in changes in the spot price of underlying commodities. The ETFs issue debentures to investors with each debenture backed by the respective physical commodity. On issuance each debenture is based on 1/100th of a troy ounce of the respective commodity. The physical commodities are stored at recognised custodian storage vaults in London. The ETFs are denominated in rands and are classified as domestic assets. The ETFs are regulated by the Financial Markets Act and the JSE's Listings Requirements.
Special Purpose Entity (SPV) set up by South African Home Loans (Pty) Ltd (SAHL) into which it originates home loans. The SPV is funded by debt provided by Liberty and equity provided by SAHL.
A structured entity set up by Nedbank Limited. It is a securitisation vehicle into which it originates home loans, and into which Liberty can lend on a secured basis. Equity is provided by Nedbank
SPV set up by SA Taxi to raise debt funding which it
in turn uses to originate taxi loans.
Universal Credit S.A. Investment fund Debt funders
Limited.
on single or multiple corporate names.
notes to third-party investors.
Principal nature of funding
Credit-linked notes issued to third-party
Commercial paper issued to third-party
The unconsolidated structured entity is funded by the issue of non-interestbearing debentures that are 100% backed by the underlying physical commodity
Debt funders in the securitisation
Debt funders in the securitisation
Debt funders in the securitisation
in the securitisation
market
market
market
market
investors
investors
The following represents the group's interests in these entities:
| 2019 Rm |
2018 Rm |
|
|---|---|---|
| Balance sheet | ||
| Unconsolidated structured entities: | ||
| Financial investments | 248 | 340 |
| Deposits and debt funding accounts from customers | (1 668) | (2 118) |
| Trading assets | 42 | 31 |
| Total | (1 378) | (1 747) |
For both 2018 and 2019, Blue Diamond No. 1 and No. 2 earned income via a once-off fee and commission income earned for structuring the SE.
| Liberty Group Limited | Africa Regions1 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 Rm |
2018 Rm |
2019 Rm |
2018 Rm |
||
| Non-controlling's interests (%) | 46 | 46 | * | * | |
| Summarised financial information on an IFRS basis before intercompany eliminations |
|||||
| Total assets | 461 674 | 437 274 | 233 813 | 214 883 | |
| Total liabilities | 429 285 | 405 881 | 195 862 | 181 335 | |
| Total income | 84 447 | 50 504 | 19 460 | 23 061 | |
| Profit for the year | 3 635 | 3 042 | 9 043 | 8 511 | |
| Change in cash balances | 403 | 1 805 | 33 911 | 8 087 | |
| Profit attributable to non-controlling interests after inter | |||||
| company eliminations | 1 416 | 1 169 | 2 515 | 2 640 | |
| Non-controlling interest within statement of financial position | 17 398 | 16 933 | 9 502 | 8 333 | |
| Dividends paid to non-controlling interests | 1 005 | 1 215 | 710 | 662 |
1 All balances except total assets and total liabilities (translated using the closing exchange rate) have been translated using cumulative exchange rates.
* Please refer to pages 124 to 127.
In Namibia, the group successfully completed the listing of its Namibian bank holding company, SBN Holdings Limited (SBNH) on the Namibian Stock Exchange (NSX) on 15 November 2019. As part of the public offer, SBNH raised equity of R200 million through an issue of ordinary shares, while Standard Bank Group Limited (SBGL) sold a portion of its stake in SBNH for a sale consideration of R522 million.
SBGL's legal shareholding in SBNH prior to the listing was 90%, but due to the degree of control SBGL retained over the shares of the empowerment structure, SBNH was consolidated at 100%, with the group accounting for the total SBNH earnings up until the listing. Post the listing, SBGL's legal shareholding in SBNH reduced from 90% to 74.9% and the empowerment structure's legal shareholding was diluted from 10% to 9.6% by the issue of ordinary shares. From the date of listing to 31 December 2019, SBNH remains consolidated, but with 84.5% of SBNH earnings attributable to ordinary shareholders and the remaining 15.5% of SBNH earnings attributable to non-controlling shareholders. The group recognised an increase in NCI of R617 million and a decrease in retained earnings and equity attributable to ordinary shareholders of R105 million due to the changes in the group's ownership interest in SBNH.
With effect from 1 January 2020, the restrictions on the allocated shares held within the empowerment structure expired and SBGL no longer retains control over those shares. Accordingly, while SBGL continues to consolidate SBNH from 1 January 2020, 74.9% of SBNH earnings are attributable to SBGL as controlling shareholder and the remaining 25.1% of SBNH earnings are attributable to non-controlling shareholders.
During the period, Stanbic Africa Holdings Limited (SAHL), a wholly owned subsidiary of Standard Bank Group (SBG), increased its shareholdings in its listed Nigerian and Kenyan subsidiaries through acquisitions of additional shares from non-controlling interests (NCI). Increases in the group's interest in a subsidiary, when the group already has control, are accounted for as transactions with equity holders of the group. The difference between the purchase consideration and the group's proportionate share of the subsidiary's additional net asset value acquired is accounted for directly in equity.
In Nigeria, SAHL's shareholding in Stanbic IBTC Holdings PLC (SIBTC) increased by 12% from 53% to 65% through an announced off-market trade on the Nigerian Stock Exchange and further on-market share purchases for a total cash consideration of R2 567 million.
The group recognised a net decrease in NCI of R950 million and a decrease in retained earnings and equity attributable to owners of the group of R1 617 million because of changes in the group's ownership interest in SIBTC.
In Kenya, SAHL's shareholding in Stanbic Holdings Plc (SH Plc) increased by 9% from 60% to 69% following a two-stage tender offer and further on-market share purchases for a total cash consideration of R485 million.
The group recognised a decrease in NCI of R514 million and an increase in retained earnings and equity attributable to owners of the group of R29 million because of changes in the group's ownership interest in SH Plc.
During the period, Liberty Group Limited's (Liberty) shareholding in Liberty Two Degrees (L2D) decreased by 4% from 63% to 59% for a total consideration of R301 million. Liberty recognised an increase in NCI of R249 million and an increase in retained earnings and equity attributable to ordinary shareholders of R52 million because of changes in Liberty's ownership interest in L2D.
| Safika holdings Proprietary Limited1 |
Industrial and Commercial Bank of China (Argentina) S.A. # |
South African Home Loans Proprietary Limited (SAHL)3 |
|||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ownership structure | Associate | Associate | Associate Finance |
||||
| Nature of business | Investment holding company | Banking | |||||
| Principal place of business and country of incorporation |
South Africa Argentina |
South Africa | |||||
| Year end | February | December | February | ||||
| Accounting treatment | Equity accounted | Equity accounted | Equity accounted | ||||
| Date to which equity accounted | 31 December 2019 | 31 December 2019 | 31 December 2019 | ||||
| 2019 | 2018 | 2019 | 2018 | 2019 | 2018 | ||
| Rm | Rm | Rm | Rm | Rm | Rm | ||
| Effective holding (%) | 20.00 | 26.67 | 20 | 20 | 50 | 50 | |
| Income statement Total comprehensive income/(loss) |
11 | 465 | 2 915 | 2 460 | 575 | 578 | |
| Total comprehensive income/(loss) | |||||||
| attributed to equity holders of | |||||||
| the associate and joint ventures2 Dividend received from associates/ |
2 | 124 | 583 | 492 | 288 | 289 | |
| joint ventures | 70 | 27 | 33 | 138 | 113 | ||
| Statement of financial position3 | |||||||
| Non-current assets | 2 881 | 3 005 | 1 360 | 32 596 | 32 965 | ||
| Current assets | 75 | 207 | 69 053 | 5 260 | 5 135 | ||
| Non-current liabilities Current liabilities |
(200) | (117) | (331) (63 849) |
(34 496) (771) |
(35 239) (605) |
||
| Net asset value attributed to | |||||||
| equity holders of the associate | |||||||
| and joint ventures | 2 756 | 3 095 | 6 233 | 2 589 | 2 256 | ||
| Proportion of net asset value based on effective holding |
551 | 825 | 1 247 | 1 294 | 1 128 | ||
| Goodwill | 136 | ||||||
| Other | 6 | (61) | (63) | ||||
| Carrying amount | 1 196 | ||||||
| Disposal group | (1 196) | ||||||
| Carrying value | 551 | 825 | 1 389 | 1 233 | 1 065 | ||
| Share of profits/(losses) from associate and joint ventures |
2 | 124 | 583 | 492 | 288 | 289 |
1 The investment was made by the group's private equity operations and have been ring-fenced for headline earnings purposes. On the disposal of these associates and joint ventures held by the group's private equity division the gain or loss on the disposal will be included in headline earnings in terms of Headline Earnings Circular 1/2019 as issued by the South African Institute of Chartered Accountants, as amended from time-to-time.
2 Includes FCTR as reported by the associates and joint ventures. Excludes FCTR that originates at a group level as a result of inclusions of the associates and joint ventures in the group's results.
3 Summarised financial information is provided based on the latest available management accounts received.
* Refer to key management assumptions.
In November 2012, the group completed the disposal of a controlling interest in each of Industrial and Commercial Bank of China (Argentina) S.A. (previously Standard Bank Argentina S.A.), ICBC Investments Argentina S.A. Sociedad Gerente de Fondos Comunes de Inversión (previously Standard Investments S.A. Sociedad Gerente de Fondos Comunes de Inversión) and Inversora Diagonal S.A. (collectively ICBCA) to ICBC.
The group retained a 20% shareholding in ICBCA, held by Standard Bank Group's wholly owned subsidiary, Standard Bank London Holdings Limited. This residual investment was classified as an investment in associate and accounted for using the equity accounting method in terms of IAS 28.
| Joint ventures Associates Associates and joint ventures Various Various Various |
|||
|---|---|---|---|
| Associate | |||
| Banking | |||
| Various Various Various Various Various Various |
London, UK December |
||
| Equity accounted Equity accounted Equity accounted |
Equity accounted | ||
| 31 December 2019 31 December 2019 31 December 2019 |
31 December 2019 | ||
| 2019 2018 2019 2018 2019 2018 Rm Rm Rm Rm Rm Rm |
2018 | 2019 Rm |
|
| 40 Various Various Various |
40 | ||
| (185) | (3 502) | ||
| (74) | (1 401) | ||
| 3 25 |
|||
| 291 353 045 |
186 868 155 131 |
||
| (335 251) | (325 567) | ||
| 18 085 | 16 432 | ||
| 7 234 (769) |
|||
| 2 677 | |||
| 62 57 900 575 5 423 10 376 |
6 465 | 2 677 | |
| 5 46 57 35 (512) |
(74) | (1 447) |
Circular 1/2019 as issued by the South African Institute of Chartered Accountants, as amended from time-to-time.
3 Summarised financial information is provided based on the latest available management accounts received.
# Industrial and Commercial Bank of China (Argentina) S.A. (ICBCA)
1 The investment was made by the group's private equity operations and have been ring-fenced for headline earnings purposes. On the disposal of these associates and joint ventures held by the group's private equity division the gain or loss on the disposal will be included in headline earnings in terms of Headline Earnings
2 Includes FCTR as reported by the associates and joint ventures. Excludes FCTR that originates at a group level as a result of inclusions of the associates and joint
In November 2012, the group completed the disposal of a controlling interest in each of Industrial and Commercial Bank of China (Argentina) S.A. (previously Standard Bank Argentina S.A.), ICBC Investments Argentina S.A. Sociedad Gerente de Fondos Comunes de Inversión (previously Standard Investments S.A. Sociedad Gerente de Fondos Comunes de Inversión) and Inversora Diagonal S.A.
The group retained a 20% shareholding in ICBCA, held by Standard Bank Group's wholly owned subsidiary, Standard Bank London Holdings Limited. This residual investment was classified as an investment in associate and accounted for using the equity accounting
ventures in the group's results.
(collectively ICBCA) to ICBC.
method in terms of IAS 28.
* Refer to key management assumptions.
In the ICBCA shareholders' agreement, Industrial and Commercial Bank of China (ICBC) granted a put option to the group under which the group was given the right to sell its remaining shareholding in ICBCA to ICBC, by giving notice at any time between 1 December 2014 and 30 November 2019. The strike price of the put option is fixed at USD181 million. Having taken the independent advice required under the JSE Listings Requirements, on 8 August 2019, the group exercised the put option and gave the required notice to ICBC. The transaction is subject to conditions precedent customary to transactions of this nature, including regulatory approvals in China. The completion date in respect of the transaction is anticipated to be in the first half of 2020. The group would seek to reinvest net proceeds received at completion of the transaction to support its African strategy.
Based on the above, the requirements of IFRS 5 were met and equity accounting of this investment was ceased at the end of August 2019. Therefore, as at 31 December 2019, the investment in ICBCA has been disclosed as non-current assets held for sale and presented separately on the statement of financial position. The investment in ICBCA is measured at the lower of the carrying amount and fair value less costs to sell, being R1 196 million at 31 December 2019. The investment in ICBCA was not impaired at date of classification as held for sale, nor at year end.
| STANLIB Income Fund | STANLIB Balanced Cautious Fund |
STANLIB Money Market Fund2 |
STANLIB Corporate Money Market Fund |
||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ownership structure | Associate | Associate | Associate | Associate | |||||
| Nature of business | Fund | Fund | Fund | Fund | |||||
| Principal place of business |
South Africa | South Africa | South Africa | South Africa | |||||
| Year end | December | December | December | December | |||||
| Accounting treatment | Fair value accounted | Fair value accounted | Fair value accounted | Fair value accounted | |||||
| 2019 | 2018 | 2019 | 2018 | 2019 | 2018 | 2019 | 2018 | ||
| Rm | Rm | Rm | Rm | Rm | Rm | Rm | Rm | ||
| Effective holding (%) | 14 | 9 | 24 | 23 | 4 | 3 | 5 | 5 | |
| Fair value | 6 773 | 3 196 | 1 555 | 1 679 | 980 | 875 | 2 056 | 2 014 | |
| Income statement | |||||||||
| Revenue | 3 522 | 2 832 | 390 | 450 | 1 983 | 1 930 | 3 737 | 3 207 | |
| Total profit for the year | 3 280 | 2 661 | 286 | 322 | 1 837 | 1 787 | 3 643 | 3 120 | |
| Total comprehensive | |||||||||
| income | 3 280 | 2 661 | 286 | 322 | 1 837 | 1 787 | 3 643 | 3 120 | |
| Dividend received from associates |
340 | 249 | 58 | 67 | 54 | 134 | 139 | ||
| Statement of financial | |||||||||
| position1 | |||||||||
| Non-current assets | 46 058 | 34 823 | 6 480 | 7 128 | 24 630 | 23 406 | 36 527 | 37 194 | |
| Current assets | 105 | 475 | 83 | 252 | 432 | 1 614 | 1 511 | 1 932 | |
| Current liabilities | (32) | (22) | (8) | (102) | (13) | (12) | (8) | (8) | |
| Net asset value | 46 131 | 35 276 | 6 555 | 7 278 | 25 049 | 25 008 | 38 030 | 39 118 | |
| Total carrying value, including loans |
|||||||||
| measured at fair value | 6 773 | 3 196 | 1 555 | 1 679 | 980 | 875 | 2 056 | 2 014 |
2018 Rm
1 Summarised financial information of the associates and joint ventures is provided based on the latest available management accounts received.
2 These funds were not included in the SBG 2018 financial statements due to the materiality of the carrying values. As a result, the carrying value relating to other associates has been restated for 2018.
| 2019 Rm |
2018 Rm |
|
|---|---|---|
| Cost Carrying value |
48 551 |
48 619 |
| Statement of financial position2 Non-current assets Current assets Current liabilities |
75 (200) |
3 005 207 |
| Income statement Attributable income before impairment |
2 | 93 |
| Fair value | 551 | 619 |
1 Included in note 10 associates and joint ventures.
2 Summarised financial information of the associates and joint ventures is provided based on the latest available management accounts received.
| STANLIB Money Market STANLIB Corporate Fund2 Money Market Fund |
STANLIB Global Equity Feeder Fund2 |
STANLIB Equity Fund2 | STANLIB Flexible Income Fund2 |
Other associates and joint ventures – fair value accounted |
Total associates and joint ventures – fair value accounted |
|||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Associate Associate |
Associate | Associate | Associate | Associate | Associates and joint ventures |
|||||
| Fund Fund |
Fund | Fund | Fund | Various | Various | |||||
| South Africa | South Africa | South Africa | South Africa | Various | Various | |||||
| December | December | December | December | Various | Various | |||||
| Fair value accounted | Fair value accounted | Fair value accounted | Fair value accounted | Fair value accounted | Fair value accounted | |||||
| 2018 Rm |
2019 Rm |
2018 Rm |
2019 Rm |
2018 Rm |
2019 Rm |
2018 Rm |
2019 Rm |
2018 Rm |
2019 Rm |
2018 Rm |
| 5 | 31 | 27 | 15 | 16 | 25 | 17 | Various | Various | Various | Various |
| 2 014 | 1 124 | 708 | 593 | 614 | 602 | 189 | 2 485 | 4 549 | 16 168 | 13 824 |
| 3 207 3 120 |
6 (16) |
5 9 |
89 40 |
93 (1) |
170 147 |
209 132 |
||||
| (16) | 9 | 40 | (1) | 147 | 132 | |||||
| 16 | 3 | |||||||||
| 3 583 50 (3) |
2 598 36 (2) |
3 948 60 (4) |
3 800 101 (18) |
2 368 3 (2) |
4 355 156 (42) |
|||||
| 3 630 | 2 632 | 4 004 | 3 883 | 2 369 | 4 469 | |||||
| 1 124 | 708 | 593 | 614 | 602 | 189 | 2 485 | 4 549 | 16 168 | 13 824 |
associates has been restated for 2018.
Statement of financial position2
1 Included in note 10 associates and joint ventures.
Income statement
1 Summarised financial information of the associates and joint ventures is provided based on the latest available management accounts received.
Current liabilities (200)
2 Summarised financial information of the associates and joint ventures is provided based on the latest available management accounts received.
Private equity/venture capital associates and joint ventures1
2 These funds were not included in the SBG 2018 financial statements due to the materiality of the carrying values. As a result, the carrying value relating to other
Cost 48 48 Carrying value 551 619
Non-current assets 75 3 005 Current assets 207
Attributable income before impairment 2 93 Fair value 551 619
2019 Rm
2018 Rm
The group's capital management function is designed to ensure that regulatory requirements are met at all times and that the group and its principal subsidiaries are capitalised in line with the group's risk appetite and target ranges, both of which are approved by the board.
It facilitates the allocation and use of capital, to generate a return that appropriately compensates shareholders for the risks incurred. Capital adequacy is actively managed and forms a key component of the budget and forecasting process. The capital plan is tested under a range of stress scenarios as part of the group's annual ICAAP and recovery plan.
The capital management function is governed primarily by management level subcommittees that oversee the risks associated with capital management, namely the group asset and liability committee (ALCO) and one of its subcommittees, the group capital management committee. The principal governance documents are the capital management governance framework and the model risk governance framework.
The group's activities give rise to various financial, non-financial and strategic financial risks which are categorised into credit, funding and liquidity and market risk.
The group's approach to managing risk and capital is set out in the group's enterprise risk governance framework approved by the group risk and capital management committee (GRCMC).
The risk management disclosure that follows separately discloses the group's banking operations, and investment management and life insurance activities. The group's investment management and life insurance risk is primarily managed within the Liberty group of companies which houses the group's material life insurance operations. The group has a 56.0% interest in Liberty and therefore shares 56.0% of the risk exposure.
The group manages its capital levels to support business growth, maintain depositor and creditors' confidence, create value for its shareholders and ensure regulatory compliance.
The main regulatory requirements to be complied with, are those specified in the Banks Act and related regulations, which are aligned with Basel III.
Regulatory capital adequacy is measured through the following three risk-based ratios:
| 2019 Rm |
2018 Rm |
|
|---|---|---|
| IFRS ordinary shareholders' equity# Qualifying non-controlling interest# Less: regulatory adjustments |
171 229 5 611 (22 459) |
165 061 5 451 (24 628) |
| Goodwill Other intangible assets Investments in financial entities Other adjustments including IFRS 9 phase-in |
(2 186) (16 518) (5 833) 2 078 |
(2 208) (17 703) (8 616) 3 899 |
| Unappropriated profit | (14 159) | (11 643) |
| CET I capital Qualifying other equity instruments# Qualifying non-controlling interests |
140 222 7 123 636 |
134 241 5 702 385 |
| Tier I capital | 147 981 | 140 328 |
| Qualifying tier II subordinated debt# General allowance for credit impairments |
19 317 2 685 |
17 545 2 776 |
| Tier II capital | 22 002 | 20 321 |
| Total regulatory capital | 169 983 | 160 649 |
| Total capital requirement | 126 807 | 120 395 |
| Total RWA | 1 099 528 | 1 079 546 |
The numbers above are not audited unless it is denoted with #.
Credit risk is the risk of loss arising out of the failure of obligors to meet their financial or contractual obligations when due. It is composed of obligor risk, concentration risk and country risk, and represents the largest source of risk to which banking entities in the group are exposed.
The group's credit risk is a function of its business model and arises from wholesale and retail loans and advances, underwriting and guarantee commitments, as well as from the counterparty credit risk (CCR) arising from derivative and securities financing contracts entered into with our customers and trading counterparties. To the extent equity risk is held on the banking book, it is also managed under the credit risk governance framework's requirements and standards, except in so far as approval authority rests with group equity risk committee (ERC).
Credit risk is managed through:
A group credit limit and concentration guideline is embedded within the group's enterprise-wide risk management process. Within the group's overall risk appetite disciplines, the credit metrics and concentrations framework includes key credit ratios and counterparty, sector and country concentration guidelines. These in turn are cascaded to business unit and legal entity level where they are monitored against approved appetite thresholds.
A credit portfolio limit framework has been defined to monitor and control the credit risk profile within our approved risk appetite. All primary lending credit limits are set and exposures measured on the basis of risk weighting in order to best estimate exposure at default (EAD).
Pre-settlement CCR inherent in trading book exposures is measured on a potential future exposure (PFE) basis, modelled at a defined level of confidence using approved methodologies and models, and controlled within explicit approved limits for the counterparties concerned.
Wherever warranted, we attempt to mitigate credit risk, including CCR, to any counterparty, transaction, sector, or geographic region, so as to achieve the optimal balance between risk, cost, capital utilisation and reward. Risk mitigation may include the use of collateral, the imposition of financial or behavioural covenants, the acceptance of guarantees from parents or third-parties, the recognition of parental support, and the distribution of risk.
Collateral, parental guarantees, credit derivatives and on- and offbalance sheet netting are widely used to mitigate credit risk. CRM policies and procedures ensure that risk mitigation techniques are acceptable, used consistently, valued appropriately and regularly, and meet the risk requirements of operational management for legal, practical and timely enforcement. Detailed processes and procedures are in place to guide each type of mitigation used.
In the case of collateral where we have an unassailable legal title, our policy requires collateral to meet certain criteria for recognition in LGD modelling, including:
The main types of collateral obtained for our banking book exposures include:
Reverse repurchase agreements and commodity leases to customers are collateralised by the underlying assets.
Guarantees and related legal contracts are often required, particularly in support of credit extension to groups of companies and weaker obligors. Guarantors include banks, parent companies, shareholders and associated obligors. Creditworthiness is established for the guarantor as for other obligor credit approvals.
For trading and derivatives transactions where collateral support is considered necessary, the group typically uses recognised and enforceable international swaps and derivatives association agreements (ISDA), with a credit support annexure.
Netting agreements, such as collateral under the credit support annexure of an ISDA agreement, are obtained only where the group firstly has a legally enforceable right to offset credit risk by way of such an agreement, and secondly where the group has the intention of utilising such agreement to settle on a net basis.
Other credit protection terms may be stipulated, such as limitations on the amount of unsecured credit exposure acceptable, collateralisation if the mark-to-market credit exposure exceeds acceptable limits, and termination of the contract if certain credit events occur, for example, downgrade of the counterparty's public credit rating.
Wrong-way risk arises in transactions where the likelihood of default (the PD) by a counterparty and the size of credit exposure (as measured by EAD) to that counterparty tend to increase at the same time. This risk is managed both at an individual counterparty level and at an aggregate portfolio level by limiting exposure to such transactions, taking adverse correlation into account in the measurement and mitigation of credit exposure and increasing oversight and approval levels. We have no appetite for wrong-way risk arising where the correlation between EAD and PD is due to a legal, economic, strategic or similar relationship (specific wrong-way risk). General wrong-way risk, which arises when the EAD and PD for the counterparty is correlated due to macro factors, is closely managed within existing risk frameworks.
To manage actual or potential portfolio risk concentrations in areas of higher credit risk and credit portfolio growth, we implement hedging and other strategies from time-to-time. This is done at individual counterparty, sub-portfolio and portfolio levels through the use of syndication, distribution and sale of assets, asset and portfolio limit management, credit derivatives and credit protection.
Our credit risk rating systems and processes differentiate and quantify credit risk across counterparties and asset classes. Internal risk parameters are used extensively in risk management and business processes, including:
Corporate entities include large companies, as well as small and medium entities (SMEs) that are managed on a relationship basis or have a combined exposure to the group of more than R12 million. Corporate exposures also include specialised lending (project, object and commodity finance, as well as income-producing real estate (IPRE) and public sector entities.
Sovereign and bank borrowers include sovereign government entities, central banks, local and provincial government entities, bank and non-bank financial institutions.
The creditworthiness of corporate (excluding specialised lending), sovereign and bank exposures is assessed based on a detailed individual assessment of the financial strength of the borrower. This quantitative analysis, together with expert judgement and external rating agency ratings, leads to an assignment of an internal rating to the entity.
Specialised lending's creditworthiness is assessed on a transactional level, rather than on the financial strength of the borrower, in so far as the group relies only on repayment from the cash flows generated by the underlying assets financed.
Concentration risk management is performed to ensure that credit exposure concentrations in respect of obligors, countries, sectors and other risk areas are effectively managed. This includes concentrations arising from credit exposure to different entities within an obligor economic group, such as exposure to public sector and other government entities that are related to the same sovereign.
Debt financial assets at amortised cost and FVOCI, as well as off-balance sheet exposure subject to an ECL are analysed and categorised based on credit quality using the group's master rating scale. Exposures within stage 1 and stage 2 are rated between 1 to 25 in terms of the group's master rating scale. The 25-point master rating scale quantifies using the credit risk for each borrower (corporate asset classes) or facility (specialised lending and retail asset classes), as illustrated in the following table. These ratings are mapped to PDs by means of calibration formulae that use historical default rates and other data from the applicable PBB portfolios. The group distinguishes between through-the-cycle PDs and point-in-time PDs, and utilises both measures in decision-making, managing credit risk exposures and measuring impairments against credit exposures. Exposures which are in default are not considered in the 1 to 25-point master rating scale.
The group's definition of default has been aligned to its internal credit risk management definitions and approaches. While the specific determination of default varies according to the nature of the product, it is generally determined (aligned to the Basel definition) as occurring at the earlier of:
The group will not rebut IFRS 9's 90 days past due rebuttable presumption.
A financial asset is considered to be in default when there is objective evidence of impairment. The following criteria are used in determining whether there is objective evidence of impairment for financial assets or groups of financial assets:
Exposures which are overdue for more than 90 days are also considered to be in default.
| SB 1 – 12 | SB 13 – 20 | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Exposure | Stage 1 | Stage 2 | Stage 1 | Stage 2 | ||
| 2019 | Rm | Rm | Rm | Rm | Rm | |
| Loans and advances at amortised cost | ||||||
| Personal & Business Banking | 737 494 | 264 388 | 475 | 355 060 | 16 932 | |
| Mortgage loans | 378 003 | 168 629 | 17 | 146 081 | 10 231 | |
| Vehicle and asset finance | 94 833 | 10 467 | 164 | 68 906 | 2 238 | |
| Card debtors Other loans and advances |
34 612 230 046 |
1 245 84 047 |
11 283 |
27 480 112 593 |
646 3 817 |
|
| Personal unsecured lending | 66 463 | 3 065 | 32 | 46 597 | 715 | |
| Business lending and other | 163 583 | 80 982 | 251 | 65 996 | 3 102 | |
| Corporate & Investment Banking | 533 348 | 314 850 | 2 731 | 176 738 | 20 537 | |
| Corporate | 406 285 | 212 144 | 2 585 | 156 792 | 20 162 | |
| Sovereign | 19 142 | 7 472 | 146 | 11 325 | 96 | |
| Banking | 107 921 | 95 234 | 8 621 | 279 | ||
| Other service | (54 657) | (54 657) | ||||
| Gross carrying amount of loans and advances | ||||||
| at amortised cost | 1 216 185 | 524 581 | 3 206 | 531 798 | 37 469 | |
| Less: total expected credit loss for loans and advances |
(35 279) | |||||
| Net carrying amount of loans and advances | ||||||
| at amortised cost | 1 180 906 | |||||
| Financial investments at amortised cost | ||||||
| Corporate | 21 323 | 20 999 | 324 | |||
| Sovereign Banking |
124 469 991 |
120 592 872 |
3 598 47 |
72 | ||
| Other instruments | 841 | 841 | ||||
| Gross carrying amount of financial investments | 147 624 | |||||
| Less: total expected credit loss for financial | ||||||
| investments | (68) | |||||
| Net carrying amount of financial investments | 147 556 | |||||
| Financial investments at fair value through OCI | ||||||
| Corporate | 2 843 | 2 843 | ||||
| Sovereign | 23 062 | 15 700 | 33 | 160 | 7 169 | |
| Gross carrying value of financial investments | 25 905 | |||||
| Add: fair value reserve relating to fair value adjustments (before the ECL balance) |
20 | |||||
| Total financial investment at fair value | ||||||
| through OCI | 25 925 | |||||
| Off-balance sheet exposure | ||||||
| Letters of credit and bankers' acceptances | 15 104 | 12 443 | 15 | 2 307 | 285 | |
| Guarantees Unutilised facilities3 |
79 202 163 437 |
62 594 142 823 |
13 1 218 |
12 108 16 298 |
3 593 2 851 |
|
| Total exposure to off-balance sheet credit risk | 257 743 | 217 860 | 1 246 | 30 713 | 6 729 | |
| Expected credit loss for off-balance sheet | ||||||
| exposures | (198) | |||||
| Net carrying amount of off-balance sheet | 257 545 | |||||
| Total exposure to credit risk on financial assets | ||||||
| subject to an expected credit loss | 1 611 932 | |||||
| Exposures not subject to ECL | 431 370 | |||||
| Other loans and advances at FVTPL Cash and balances with central banks1 |
161 75 288 |
|||||
| Derivative assets | 66 825 | |||||
| Other financial investments | 31 242 | |||||
| Trading assets | 220 409 | |||||
| Pledged assets Interest associates and joint ventures |
17 800 5 147 |
|||||
| Other financial assets2 | 14 498 | |||||
| Total exposure to credit risk | 2 043 302 |
Nonperforming exposures %
1 Balances with central banks comprise of FVTPL of R65 650 million that are not subject to ECL considerations and amortised cost of R9 368 million, which has a low probability of default, therefore ECL is insignificant. These balances are subject to the rigorous regulatory requirements of these transactions and its link to the underlying entities' ability to operate as a bank. Amount represents deposits placed in currencies as issued by the central banks with which they are stored. 2 Due to the short term nature of these financial assets and historical experience, other financial assets are regarded as having a low probability of default.
3 The ECL on unutilised facilities is included in the total ECL for loans and advances.
| Default | SB 21 – 25 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| expected and expected credit loss recoveries and interest Gross on default in suspense default exposures on stage 3 coverage Rm Rm % |
Securities | Total gross carrying amount of default exposures Rm |
Stage 3 Rm |
Stage 2 Rm |
Stage 1 Rm |
| 19 365 19 298 50 |
38 663 | 38 663 | 45 900 | 16 076 | |
| 13 337 8 333 38 |
21 670 | 21 670 | 24 329 | 7 046 | |
| 2 234 2 066 48 |
4 300 | 4 300 | 6 352 | 2 406 | |
| 412 1 089 73 |
1 501 | 1 501 | 2 871 | 858 | |
| 3 382 7 810 70 |
11 192 | 11 192 | 12 348 | 5 766 | |
| 923 4 412 83 |
5 335 | 5 335 | 5 935 | 4 784 | |
| 2 459 3 398 58 |
5 857 | 5 857 | 6 413 | 982 | |
| 4 949 3 316 40 |
8 265 | 8 265 | 2 704 | 7 523 | |
| 4 949 | 8 265 | 8 265 | 2 405 | 3 932 | |
| 3 316 | 103 | ||||
| 299 | 3 488 | ||||
| 24 314 22 614 48 |
46 928 | 46 928 | 48 604 | 23 599 |
Sovereign 124 469 120 592 3 598 174 105
IFRS: MAXIMUM EXPOSURE TO CREDIT RISK BY CREDIT QUALITY
Other instruments 841 841
Corporate 2 843 2 843
and advances (35 279)
at amortised cost 1 180 906
Gross carrying amount of financial investments 147 624
investments (68) Net carrying amount of financial investments 147 556
Gross carrying value of financial investments 25 905
adjustments (before the ECL balance) 20
through OCI 25 925
exposures (198) Net carrying amount of off-balance sheet 257 545
subject to an expected credit loss 1 611 932 Exposures not subject to ECL 431 370 Other loans and advances at FVTPL 161 Cash and balances with central banks1 75 288 Derivative assets 66 825 Other financial investments 31 242 Trading assets 220 409 Pledged assets 17 800 Interest associates and joint ventures 5 147 Other financial assets2 14 498 Total exposure to credit risk 2 043 302
3 The ECL on unutilised facilities is included in the total ECL for loans and advances.
Corporate 21 323 20 999 324
Banking 991 872 47 72
1 Balances with central banks comprise of FVTPL of R65 650 million that are not subject to ECL considerations and amortised cost of R9 368 million, which has a low probability of default, therefore ECL is insignificant. These balances are subject to the rigorous regulatory requirements of these transactions and its link to the underlying entities' ability to operate as a bank. Amount represents deposits placed in currencies as issued by the central banks with which they are stored. 2 Due to the short term nature of these financial assets and historical experience, other financial assets are regarded as having a low probability of default.
Sovereign 23 062 15 700 33 160 7 169
Net carrying amount of loans and advances
Financial investments at amortised cost
Less: total expected credit loss for financial
Add: fair value reserve relating to fair value
Total financial investment at fair value
Expected credit loss for off-balance sheet
Total exposure to credit risk on financial assets
Off-balance sheet exposure
Financial investments at fair value through OCI
Less: total expected credit loss for loans
| 15 2 307 285 |
19 | 11 | 24 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 13 12 108 3 593 |
5 | 207 | 682 | |
| 1 218 16 298 2 851 |
4 | 114 | 129 | |
| 1 246 30 713 6 729 |
28 | 332 | 835 |
| SB 1 – 12 | SB 13 – 20 | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Exposure | Stage 1 | Stage 2 | Stage 1 | Stage 2 | ||
| 20184 | Rm | Rm | Rm | Rm | Rm | |
| Loans and advances at amortised cost Personal & Business Banking |
701 197 | 191 076 | 1 815 | 407 955 | 7 083 | |
| Mortgage loans | 362 006 | 108 575 | 1 786 | 196 795 | 4 332 | |
| Vehicle and asset finance | 89 410 | 1 250 | 11 | 75 939 | 1 214 | |
| Card debtors | 33 216 | 1 604 | 8 | 25 382 | 174 | |
| Personal unsecured lending | 59 459 | 961 | 46 457 | 8 | ||
| Business lending and other | 157 106 | 78 686 | 10 | 63 382 | 1 355 | |
| Corporate & Investment Banking | 509 519 | 291 913 | 4 912 | 178 768 | 17 965 | |
| Corporate | 390 403 | 184 008 | 4 801 | 170 726 | 17 598 | |
| Sovereign | 8 288 | 4 533 | 109 | 3 319 | 129 | |
| Banking | 110 828 | 103 372 | 2 | 4 723 | 238 | |
| Other service | (55 688) | (55 688) | ||||
| Gross carrying amount of loans and advances at amortised cost |
1 155 028 | 427 301 | 6 727 | 586 723 | 25 048 | |
| Less: total expected credit loss for loans | ||||||
| and advances | (36 685) | |||||
| Net carrying amount of loans and advances at amortised cost |
1 118 343 | |||||
| Financial investments at amortised cost | ||||||
| Corporate | 15 433 | 14 084 | 1 349 | |||
| Sovereign | 126 184 | 113 771 | 9 531 | |||
| Banking | 1 974 | 1 974 | ||||
| Other instruments | 742 | 742 | ||||
| Gross carrying amount of financial investments |
144 333 | |||||
| Less: total expected credit loss for financial | ||||||
| investments | (194) | |||||
| Net carrying amount of financial investments | 144 139 | |||||
| Financial investments at fair value through OCI | ||||||
| Corporate | 1 756 | 1 325 | 409 | |||
| Sovereign | 34 488 | 10 181 | 16 997 | |||
| Gross carrying value of financial investments Add: fair value reserve relating to fair value |
53 047 | |||||
| adjustments (before the ECL balance) | 36 | |||||
| Total financial investment at fair value | ||||||
| through OCI | 53 083 | |||||
| Off-balance sheet exposure | ||||||
| Letters of credit and bankers' acceptances Guarantees |
8 206 57 070 |
5 206 42 311 |
82 1 053 |
2 563 11 263 |
321 1 830 |
|
| Unutilised facilities3 | 178 959 | 153 924 | 1 811 | 20 307 | 2 872 | |
| Total exposure to off-balance sheet credit risk | 244 235 | 201 441 | 2 946 | 34 133 | 5 023 | |
| Expected credit loss for off-balance sheet | ||||||
| exposures | (588) | |||||
| Net carrying amount of off-balance sheet | 243 647 | |||||
| Total exposure to credit risk on financial | ||||||
| assets subject to an expected credit loss | 1 561 537 | |||||
| Exposures not subject to ECL | 329 906 | |||||
| Other loans and advances at fair value Cash and balances with central banks1 |
1 204 85 145 |
|||||
| Derivative assets | 48 429 | |||||
| Other financial investments | ||||||
| Trading assets Pledged assets |
178 327 7 218 |
|||||
| Other financial assets2 | 9 583 | |||||
| Total exposure to credit risk | 1 891 443 |
Nonperforming exposures %
1 Balances with central banks comprise of FVTPL of R76 085 million that are not subject to ECL considerations and amortised cost of R9 050 million, which has a low probability of default therefore ECL is insignificant. These balances are subject to the rigorous regulatory requirements of these transactions and its link to the underlying entities' ability to operate as a bank. Amount represents deposits placed in currencies as issued by the central banks with which they are stored.
2 Due to the short term nature of these financial assets and historical experience, other financial assets are regarded as having a low probability of default.
3 The ECL on unutilised facilities is included in the total ECL for loans and advances.
4 Restated. Refer to page 31 for further details on the restatement.
| SB 21 – 25 Stage 1 |
Stage 2 | Default Stage 3 |
Total gross carrying amount of default exposures |
Securities and expected recoveries on default exposures |
Balance sheet expected credit loss and interest in suspense on stage 3 |
Gross default coverage |
Non performing exposures |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rm | Rm | Rm | Rm | Rm | Rm | % | % |
| 8 220 | 50 589 | 34 459 | 34 459 | 17 167 | 17 292 | 50 | 4.9 |
| 4 261 | 27 840 | 18 417 | 18 417 | 11 342 | 7 075 | 38 | 5.1 |
| 347 | 7 138 | 3 511 | 3 511 | 1 827 | 1 684 | 48 | 3.9 |
| 317 | 3 882 | 1 849 | 1 849 | 405 | 1 444 | 78 | 5.6 |
| 1 556 | 5 625 | 4 852 | 4 852 | 900 | 3 952 | 81 | 8.2 |
| 1 739 | 6 104 | 5 830 | 5 830 | 2 693 | 3 137 | 54 | 3.7 |
| 3 833 | 2 394 | 9 734 | 9 734 | 3 225 | 6 509 | 67 | 1.9 |
| 1 142 | 2 394 | 9 734 | 9 734 | 3 225 | 6 509 | 67 | 2.5 |
| 198 2 493 |
|||||||
| 12 053 | 52 983 | 44 193 | 44 193 | 20 392 | 23 801 | 54 | 3.8 |
Sovereign 126 184 113 771 9 531 2 882
IFRS: MAXIMUM EXPOSURE TO CREDIT RISK BY CREDIT QUALITY CONTINUED
Banking 1 974 1 974 Other instruments 742 742
and advances (36 685)
at amortised cost 1 118 343
exposures (588) Net carrying amount of off-balance sheet 243 647
assets subject to an expected credit loss 1 561 537 Exposures not subject to ECL 329 906 Other loans and advances at fair value 1 204 Cash and balances with central banks1 85 145 Derivative assets 48 429
Trading assets 178 327 Pledged assets 7 218 Other financial assets2 9 583 Total exposure to credit risk 1 891 443
3 The ECL on unutilised facilities is included in the total ECL for loans and advances.
4 Restated. Refer to page 31 for further details on the restatement.
Corporate 15 433 14 084 1 349
1 Balances with central banks comprise of FVTPL of R76 085 million that are not subject to ECL considerations and amortised cost of R9 050 million, which has a low probability of default therefore ECL is insignificant. These balances are subject to the rigorous regulatory requirements of these transactions and its link to the underlying entities' ability to operate as a bank. Amount represents deposits placed in currencies as issued by the central banks with which they are stored. 2 Due to the short term nature of these financial assets and historical experience, other financial assets are regarded as having a low probability of default.
Net carrying amount of loans and advances
Financial investments at amortised cost
Expected credit loss for off-balance sheet
Total exposure to credit risk on financial
Other financial investments
Less: total expected credit loss for loans
| Other instruments 742 742 |
|||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross carrying amount of financial investments 144 333 |
|||||
| Less: total expected credit loss for financial investments (194) |
|||||
| Net carrying amount of financial investments 144 139 |
|||||
| Financial investments at fair value through OCI Corporate 1 756 1 325 409 |
22 | ||||
| Sovereign 34 488 10 181 16 997 Gross carrying value of financial investments 53 047 |
7 310 | ||||
| Add: fair value reserve relating to fair value | |||||
| adjustments (before the ECL balance) 36 Total financial investment at fair value |
|||||
| through OCI 53 083 |
|||||
| Off-balance sheet exposure Letters of credit and bankers' acceptances 8 206 5 206 82 2 563 321 |
24 | 8 | 2 | ||
| Guarantees 57 070 42 311 1 053 11 263 1 830 Unutilised facilities3 178 959 153 924 1 811 20 307 2 872 |
2 11 |
101 34 |
510 | ||
| Total exposure to off-balance sheet credit risk 244 235 201 441 2 946 34 133 5 023 |
37 | 143 | 512 |
Concentration risk is the risk of loss arising from an excessive concentration of exposure to a single counterparty, an industry, a product, a geography, maturity, or collateral. The group's credit risk portfolio is well-diversified. The group's management approach relies on the reporting of concentration risk along key dimensions, the setting of portfolio limits and stress testing.
| 2019 Rm |
20181 Rm |
|
|---|---|---|
| Agriculture | 37 496 | 35 252 |
| Construction | 16 986 | 16 218 |
| Electricity | 25 794 | 18 781 |
| Finance, real estate and other business services | 329 628 | 348 904 |
| Individuals | 528 993 | 465 020 |
| Manufacturing | 74 503 | 78 820 |
| Mining | 40 319 | 33 423 |
| Transport | 44 439 | 37 016 |
| Wholesale | 71 000 | 60 078 |
| Other services | 47 188 | 62 720 |
| Gross loans and advances | 1 216 346 | 1 156 232 |
1 Restated. Refer to page 31 for further details on the restatement.
| 2019 | 20181 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| % | Rm | % | Rm | ||
| South Africa | 72 | 879 654 | 70 | 808 658 | |
| Africa Regions | 19 | 228 183 | 20 | 229 047 | |
| International | 9 | 108 509 | 10 | 119 647 | |
| Gross loans and advances | 100 | 1 216 346 | 100 | 1 157 332 |
1 Restated. Refer to page 31 for further details on the restatement.
| 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|
| Rm | Rm | |
| Agriculture | 1 840 | 1 776 |
| Construction | 1 076 | 842 |
| Electricity | 72 | 491 |
| Finance, real estate and other business services | 1 473 | 1 580 |
| Individuals | 14 302 | 13 743 |
| Manufacturing | 1 402 | 1 315 |
| Mining | 234 | 244 |
| Transport | 351 | 318 |
| Wholesale | 670 | 577 |
| Other services | 1 194 | 2 915 |
| Credit impairment of non-performing loans | 22 614 | 23 801 |
| 2019 | 2018 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| % | Rm | % | Rm | ||
| South Africa | 77 | 17 346 | 70 | 16 630 | |
| Africa Regions | 22 | 5 053 | 20 | 4 710 | |
| International | 1 | 215 | 10 | 2 461 | |
| Credit impairment of non-performing loans | 100 | 22 614 | 100 | 23 801 |
The table below shows the financial effect that collateral has on the group's maximum exposure to credit risk. The table is presented according to Basel asset categories and includes collateral that may not be eligible for recognition under Basel but that management takes into consideration in the management of the group's exposures to credit risk. All on- and off-balance sheet exposures that are exposed to credit risk, including NPL, have been included.
Collateral includes:
Netting agreements, which do not qualify for offset under IFRS but which are nevertheless enforceable, are included as part of the group's collateral for risk management purposes. All exposures are presented before the effect of any impairment provisions. In the retail portfolio, 55% (2018: 56%) is fully collateralised. The R5.3 billion (2018: R4.5 billion) of retail accounts that lie within the 0% to 50% range of collateral coverage mainly comprise accounts which are either in default or legal. The total average collateral coverage for all retail mortgage exposures in the 50% to 100% collateral coverage category is 77% (2018: 79%).
Of the group's total exposure, 52% (2018: 57%) is unsecured and mainly reflects exposures to well-rated corporate counterparties, bank counterparties and sovereign entities.
The group does not currently trade commodities that could give rise to physical commodity inventory or collateral exposure with the exception of precious metals. In the normal course of its precious metal trading operations, the group does not hold allocated physical metal; however, this may occur from time-to-time. Where this does occur, appropriate risk and business approval is required to ensure that the minimum requirements are satisfied, including but not limited to approval of risk limits and insurance cover.
| Unsecured (a) Rm |
Secured (b) Rm |
Netting agree ments (c) Rm |
Secured exposure after netting (b-c) Rm |
Collateral coverage – Total collateral |
||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | Total exposure (a+b) Rm |
1 to 50% Rm |
50 to 100% Rm |
Greater than 100% Rm |
||||
| Corporate Sovereign Bank Retail |
614 201 316 427 217 370 638 865 |
422 098 301 410 80 482 129 574 |
192 103 15 017 136 888 509 291 |
11 106 3 351 61 306 439 |
180 997 11 666 75 582 508 852 |
19 995 1 49 852 5 254 |
123 086 11 619 21 411 151 509 |
37 917 46 4 319 352 088 |
| Retail mortgage Other retail |
390 991 247 874 |
33 129 541 |
390 958 118 333 |
439 | 390 958 117 894 |
2 430 2 824 |
47 627 103 882 |
340 901 11 187 |
| Total | 1 786 863 | 933 564 | 853 299 | 76 202 | 777 097 | 75 102 | 307 625 | 394 370 |
| Add: financial assets not exposed to credit risk Less: impairments for loans and advances Less: unrecognised off balance sheet items |
197 252 (35 279) (168 246) |
|||||||
| Total exposure | 1 780 590 | |||||||
| Cash and balances with central banks Derivative assets Trading assets Pledged assets Financial investments Loans and advances Other financial assets |
75 288 66 825 220 409 17 800 204 703 1 181 067 14 498 |
|||||||
| Total | 1 780 590 |
| 2018 | Secured exposure after netting (b-c) Rm |
Collateral coverage – Total collateral |
||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total exposure (a+b) Rm |
Unsecured (a) Rm |
Secured (b) |
Netting agreements (c) Rm |
1 to 50% Rm |
50 to 100% Rm |
Greater than 100% Rm |
||
| Corporate Sovereign Bank1, 2 Retail |
612 478 259 994 359 873 604 711 |
439 420 249 101 232 815 120 343 |
173 058 10 893 127 058 484 368 |
10 540 2 265 45 732 473 |
162 518 8 628 81 326 483 895 |
13 855 771 44 668 4 536 |
116 605 7 150 31 161 139 280 |
32 058 706 5 497 340 079 |
| Retail mortgage Other retail |
372 152 232 559 |
68 120 275 |
372 084 112 284 |
473 | 372 084 111 811 |
1 217 3 319 |
42 134 97 146 |
328 734 11 345 |
| Total | 1 837 056 | 1 041 679 | 795 377 | 59 010 | 736 367 | 63 830 | 294 196 | 378 340 |
| Add: financial assets not exposed to credit risk Less: impairments for loans and advances Less: unrecognised off |
33 888 (36 685) |
|||||||
| balance sheet items1 Total exposure |
(180 630) 1 653 629 |
|||||||
| Cash and balances with central banks Derivative assets Trading assets Pledged assets Financial investments |
85 145 48 429 178 327 7 218 205 380 |
|||||||
| Loans and advances1 | 1 119 547 |
1 Restated. Refer to page 31 for further details on the restatement.
2 Security firms in the prior year have been treated as corporates whereas in the current year and in future year, they will be treated as banks.
Other financial assets 9 583 Total 1 653 629
Liquidity risk is the risk that an entity, although solvent, cannot maintain or generate sufficient cash resources to meet its payment obligations in full as they fall due, or can only do so at materially disadvantageous terms.
The nature of the group's banking and trading activities gives rise to continuous exposure to liquidity risk. Liquidity risk may arise where counterparties, who provide the group with short-term funding, withdraw or do not roll over that funding, or normally liquid assets become illiquid as a result of a generalised disruption in asset markets.
The group manages liquidity in accordance with applicable regulations and within the group's risk appetite framework. The group's liquidity risk management governance framework supports the measurement and management of liquidity across both the corporate and retail sectors to ensure that payment obligations can be met by the group's legal entities, under both normal and stressed conditions. Liquidity risk management ensures that the group has the appropriate amount, diversification and tenor of funding and liquidity to support its asset base at all times. The group manages liquidity risk as three interrelated pillars, which are aligned to the Basel III liquidity requirements.
The following table analyses cash flows on a contractual, undiscounted basis based on the earliest date on which the group can be required to pay (except for trading liabilities and derivative liabilities, which are presented as redeemable on demand) and will therefore not agree directly to the balances disclosed in the consolidated statement of financial position (SOFP).
Derivative liabilities are included in the maturity analysis on a contractual, undiscounted basis when contractual maturities are essential for an understanding of the derivatives' future cash flows. Management considers only contractual maturities to be essential for understanding the future cash flows of derivative liabilities that are designated as hedging instruments in effective hedge accounting relationships. All other derivative liabilities, together with trading liabilities, are treated as trading and are included at fair value in the redeemable on demand bucket since these positions are typically held for short periods of time.
The table also includes contractual cash flows with respect to off-balance sheet items. Where cash flows are exchanged simultaneously, the net amounts have been reflected.
| Redeemable on demand Rm |
Maturing within 1 month Rm |
Maturing between 1 – 6 months Rm |
Maturing between 6 – 12 months Rm |
Maturing after 12 months Rm |
Total Rm |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 Financial liabilities |
||||||
| Derivative financial instruments | 64 724 | 6 | 612 | 254 | 2 500 | 68 096 |
| Instruments settled on a net basis Instruments settled on a gross basis |
40 298 24 426 |
6 | 500 112 |
197 57 |
2 454 46 |
43 455 24 641 |
| Trading liabilities Deposits and debt funding Subordinated debt Other1 |
83 718 856 174 |
315 553 795 19 492 |
34 564 2 958 |
23 398 5 538 6 146 |
236 545 18 528 16 878 |
83 718 1 466 234 27 819 42 516 |
| Total | 1 004 616 | 335 846 | 38 134 | 35 336 | 274 451 | 1 688 383 |
| Unrecognised financial liabilities Letters of credit and bankers' acceptances Guarantees Irrevocable unutilised facilities |
15 104 79 202 73 940 |
15 104 79 202 73 940 |
||||
| Total | 168 246 | 168 246 | ||||
| 2018 Financial liabilities Derivative financial instruments |
49 586 | 1 | 198 | 152 | 232 | 50 169 |
| Instruments settled on a net basis Instruments settled on a gross basis |
31 016 18 570 |
1 | 111 87 |
53 99 |
146 86 |
31 327 18 842 |
| Trading liabilities Deposits and debt funding Subordinated debt Other1 |
61 267 912 296 |
63 412 58 18 196 |
154 403 411 |
80 128 6 594 |
195 352 15 901 |
61 267 1 405 591 22 964 18 196 |
| Total | 1 023 149 | 81 667 | 155 012 | 86 874 | 211 485 | 1 558 187 |
| Unrecognised financial liabilities Letters of credit and bankers' |
||||||
| acceptances Guarantees Irrevocable unutilised facilities |
17 802 85 576 77 253 |
17 802 85 576 77 253 |
||||
| Total | 180 631 | 180 631 |
1 The group has, as permitted by IFRS 16, elected not to restate its comparative annual financial statements. Comparability will therefore not be achieved as the comparative annual financial information has been prepared on an IAS 17 basis. Refer to page 29 for more detail on the adoption of IFRS 16.
Market risk is the risk of a change in the market value, actual or effective earnings, or future cash flows of a portfolio of financial instruments, including commodities, caused by adverse movements in market variables such as equity, bond and commodity prices, currency exchange and interest rates, credit spreads, recovery rates, correlations and implied volatilities in all of these variables.
The group's key market risks are:
Trading book market risk is represented by financial instruments, including commodities, held in the trading book, arising out of normal global markets' trading activity.
The group's policy is that all trading activities are undertaken within the group's global markets' operations.
The market risk functions are independent of the group's trading operations and are accountable to the relevant legal entity ALCOs. ALCOs have a reporting line into group ALCO, a subcommittee of GROC.
All VaR and SVaR limits require prior approval from the respective entity ALCOs. The market risk functions have the authority to set these limits at a lower level.
Market risk teams are responsible for identifying, measuring, managing, monitoring and reporting market risk as outlined in the market risk governance standard.
Exposures and excesses are monitored and reported daily. Where breaches in limits and triggers occur, actions are taken by market risk functions to bring exposures back in line with approved market risk appetite, with such breaches being reported to management and entity ALCOs.
The group uses the historical VaR and SVaR approach to quantify market risk under normal and stressed conditions.
For risk management purposes VaR is based on 251 days of unweighted recent historical data updated at least monthly, a holding period of one day and a confidence level of 95%. The historical VaR results are calculated in four steps:
Daily losses exceeding the VaR are likely to occur, on average, 13 times in every 250 days.
SVaR uses a similar methodology to VaR, but is based on a 251-day period of financial stress which is reviewed quarterly and assumes a ten-day holding period and a worst case loss.
The ten-day period is based on the average expected time to reduce positions. The period of stress for SBSA is currently the 2008/2009 financial crisis while, for other markets, more recent stress periods are used where the group has received internal model approval, the market risk regulatory capital requirements is based on VaR and SVaR, both of which use a confidence level of 99% and a ten-day holding period.
Limitations of historical VaR are acknowledged globally and include:
VaR is calculated on the basis of exposures outstanding at the close of business and, therefore, does not necessarily reflect intra-day exposures. VaR is unlikely to reflect loss potential on exposures that only arise under significant market movements.
Trading book market risk exposures arise mainly from residual exposures from client transactions and limited trading for the group's own account. In general, the group's trading desks have run increased levels of market risk throughout the year for all asset classes when compared to 2018 aggregate normal VaR, and aggregate SVaR.
| Normal VaR | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Maximum1 Rm |
Minimum1 Rm |
Average Rm |
Closing Rm |
||||
| 2019 | |||||||
| Commodities risk | 3 | 1 | 1 | ||||
| Foreign exchange risk | 26 | 9 | 14 | 15 | |||
| Equity position risk | 18 | 4 | 8 | 11 | |||
| Debt securities | 28 | 15 | 21 | 23 | |||
| Diversification benefits2 | (10) | (21) | |||||
| Aggregate | 53 | 22 | 34 | 29 | |||
| 2018 | |||||||
| Commodities risk | 3 | 1 | 2 | ||||
| Foreign exchange risk | 20 | 8 | 12 | 12 | |||
| Equity position risk | 12 | 2 | 6 | 8 | |||
| Debt securities | 33 | 12 | 17 | 20 | |||
| Diversification benefits2 | (10) | (16) | |||||
| Aggregate | 37 | 17 | 25 | 25 |
1 The maximum and minimum VaR figures reported for each market variable do not necessarily occur on the same day. As a result, the aggregate VaR will not equal the sum of the individual market VaR values, and it is inappropriate to ascribe a diversification effect to VaR when these values may occur on different days.
2 Diversification benefit is the benefit of measuring the VaR of the trading portfolio as a whole, that is, the difference between the sum of the individual VaRs and the VaR of the whole trading portfolio.
| SVaR | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Maximum1 Rm |
Minimum1 Rm |
Average Rm |
Closing Rm |
||||
| 2019 | |||||||
| Commodities risk | 70 | 17 | 39 | 21 | |||
| Foreign exchange risk | 371 | 134 | 210 | 308 | |||
| Equity position risk | 272 | 48 | 135 | 254 | |||
| Debt securities | 367 | 202 | 280 | 303 | |||
| Diversification benefits1 | (262) | (488) | |||||
| Aggregate | 741 | 221 | 403 | 398 | |||
| 2018 | |||||||
| Commodities risk | 80 | 5 | 18 | 51 | |||
| Foreign exchange risk | 339 | 111 | 172 | 200 | |||
| Equity position risk | 310 | 39 | 108 | 121 | |||
| Debt securities | 398 | 170 | 274 | 247 | |||
| Diversification benefits2 | (268) | (250) | |||||
| Aggregate | 457 | 191 | 304 | 369 |
1 Diversification benefit is the benefit of measuring the SVaR of the trading portfolio as a whole, that is, the difference between the sum of the individual regions' SVaRs and the SVaR of the whole trading portfolio.
2 Diversification benefit is the benefit of measuring the SVaR of the trading portfolio as a whole, that is, the difference between the sum of the individual SVaRs and the SVaR of the whole trading portfolio.
3 The 2018 table has been restated to include a breakdown by asset class and to align to the normal VaR disclosure format. The aggregate figures remain unchanged however, the diversification benefit is restated to include asset class diversification as opposed to regional diversification.
Banking book-related market risk exposure principally involves managing the potential adverse effect of interest rate movements on banking book earnings (net interest income and banking book mark-to-market profit or loss) and the economic value of equity.
The group's approach to managing IRRBB is governed by applicable regulations and is influenced by the competitive environment in which the group operates. The group's treasury and capital management team monitors banking book interest rate risk on a monthly basis operating under the oversight of group ALCO.
154
The analytical techniques used to quantify IRRBB include both earnings and valuation-based measures. The analysis takes into account embedded optionality such as loan prepayments and accounts where the account behaviour differs from the contractual position.
The results obtained from forward-looking dynamic scenario analyses, as well as Monte Carlo simulations, assist in developing optimal hedging strategies on a risk-adjusted return basis.
| ZAR | USD | GBP | Euro | Other | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | |||||||
| Increase in basis points | 200 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | ||
| Sensitivity of annual net interest income | Rm | 2 471 | 444 | 246 | 39 | 674 | 3 874 |
| Decrease in basis points | 200 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | ||
| Sensitivity of annual net interest income | Rm | (2 541) | (563) | (224) | (672) | (4 000) | |
| 20182 | |||||||
| Increase in basis points | 200 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | ||
| Sensitivity of annual net interest income | Rm | 2 227 | 623 | 189 | 52 | 529 | 3 620 |
| Decrease in basis points | 200 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | ||
| Sensitivity of annual net interest income | Rm | (2 269) | (752) | (207) | (499) | (3 727) |
1 Before tax.
2 The NII sensitivity was restated to include the impact of endowment funding in Wealth International, resulting in an increase of R541 million under the upward rate scenario and a further R589 million decrease under the downward rate scenario.
Equity risk is the risk of loss arising from a decline in the value of an equity or equity-type instrument held on the banking book, whether caused by deterioration in the underlying operating asset performance, net asset value (NAV), enterprise value of the issuing entity, or by a decline in the market price of the equity or instrument itself.
Though issuer risk in respect of tradable equity instruments constitutes equity risk, such traded issuer risk is managed under the trading book market risk framework.
Equity risk relates to all transactions and investments subject to approval by the group ERC, in terms of that committee's mandate, and includes debt, quasi-debt and other instruments that are considered to be of an equity nature.
For the avoidance of doubt, equity risk in the banking book excludes strategic investments in the group's subsidiaries, associates and joint ventures deployed in delivering the group's business and service offerings unless the group financial director and group CRO deem such investments to be subject to the consideration and approval by the group ERC.
| 10% reduction in fair value Rm |
Fair value Rm |
10% increase in fair value Rm |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 Equity securities listed and unlisted |
3 906 | 4 340 | 4 774 |
| Listed Unlisted |
145 4 195 |
||
| Impact on profit and loss Impact on OCI |
(429) (5) |
429 5 |
|
| 2018 Equity securities listed and unlisted |
3 262 | 3 624 | 3 986 |
| Listed Unlisted |
103 3 521 |
||
| Impact on profit and loss Impact on OCI |
(356) (7) |
356 7 |
The group's primary non-trading related exposures to foreign currency risk arise as a result of the translation effect of the group's net assets in foreign operations and foreign-denominated financial assets and liabilities.
The group foreign currency management committee, a subcommittee of the group capital management committee, manages the risk according to existing legislation, South African exchange control regulations and accounting parameters. It takes into account naturally offsetting risk positions and manages the group's residual risk by means of forward exchange contracts, currency swaps and option contracts.
Hedging is undertaken in such a way that it does not constrain normal operating activities. In particular, for banking entities outside of the South African common monetary area, the need for capital to fluctuate with risk-weighted assets is taken into account.
The repositioning of the group's NAV by currency, which is managed at a group level, is a controlled process based on underlying economic views and forecasts of the relative strength of currencies, other than foreign operations.
Gains or losses on derivatives that have been designated as either net investment or cash flow hedging relationships in terms of IFRS are reported directly in OCI, with all other gains and losses on derivatives being reported in profit or loss.
The table that follows reflects the expected financial impact, in rand equivalent, resulting from a 10% shock to foreign currency risk exposures, against ZAR. The sensitivity analysis is based on net open foreign currency exposures arising from foreign-denominated financial assets and liabilities inclusive of derivative financial instruments, cash balances, and accruals, but excluding net assets in foreign operations. The sensitivity analysis reflects the sensitivity of profit or loss on the group's foreign-denominated exposures other than those trading positions for which sensitivity has been included in the trading book VaR analysis.
| USD | Euro | GBP | Naira | Other | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | |||||||
| Total net long/(short) position | Rm | 298 | 90 | 25 | 1 | 49 | 463 |
| Sensitivity (ZAR depreciation)2 | % | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | |
| Impact on profit or loss | Rm | 30 | 9 | 3 | 0 | 4 | 46 |
| 20181 | |||||||
| Total net long/(short) position | Rm | 613 | 225 | 89 | 9 | 13 | 949 |
| Sensitivity (ZAR depreciation)2 | % | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | |
| Impact on profit or loss1 | Rm | 61 | 22 | 9 | 1 | 1 | 94 |
1 SBG expanded the disclosure of its non-trading foreign currency sensitivity to include foreign operations. This resulted in a restatement of expected profit of R82 million and an increase in net long foreign exchange positions by R852 million in 2018.
2 A 10% appreciation in ZAR will have an equal and opposite impact on profit or loss to the amounts disclosed above.
The group has exposure to changes in its share price arising from its equity-linked remuneration contractual commitments.
Depending on the nature of the group's equity-linked share schemes, the group is exposed to either income statement risk or NAV risk through equity due to changes in its own share price as follows:
The following table summarises the group's most material share schemes together with an explanation of which risk (where applicable) the share scheme exposes the group to, and why, and an indication as to whether the share schemes are hedged.
| Share scheme | Risk to the group | Explanation | Hedged1 | Hedged risk |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equity Growth Scheme (EGS) |
N/A | The EGS is an equity-settled share scheme that is settled through the issuance of new shares. Accordingly, the group does not incur any cash flow in settling the share schemes and, hence, is not exposed to any risk as a result of changes in its own share price. Since the EGS results in the issuance of new shares and in order to mitigate the dilutionary impact on existing shareholders, the group re-purchases shares from the open market. |
No. as there is no cash flow risk. |
N/A |
| Quanto Stock Unit Scheme (Quanto) |
Income statement risk |
The Quanto is a cash-settled share scheme. Increases in the group's share price results in losses being recognised in the income statement. |
Yes | SBK share price risk |
| Equity-settled Deferred Bonus scheme (DBS) and Performance Reward Plan (PRP) |
NAV risk | The DBS and PRP awards that are equity settled, are settled through the purchase of shares from the open market. Accordingly, for these equity-settled share schemes, increases in the group's share price above the grant price will result in losses being recognised in the group's equity. |
Yes | SBK share price risk |
| Cash-settled DBS and PRP |
Income statement risk |
The DBS and PRP awards that are cash settled result in losses being recognised in the income statement as a result of increases in the group's share price. |
Yes | SBK share price risk |
| Share Appreciation Rights Scheme (SARP) – equity settled |
NAV risk | SARP awards that are issued to individuals in the employment of a group entity domiciled in South Africa are classified as equity-settled and are settled through the purchase of shares from the open market. Accordingly, changes in the group's share price above the grant price will result in gains and/or losses being recognised directly in the group's equity. |
No, given the current number of awards that have been issued to date. The number of awards, are however, monitored to evaluate for future hedging considerations. |
N/A |
| SARP – cash settled |
Income statement risk |
Awards made to individuals of a group entity outside of South Africa are settled in cash. Increases in the group's share price will result in losses being recognised in the income statement. |
No, given the current number of awards that have been issued to date. The number of awards, are however, monitored to evaluate for future hedging considerations. |
N/A |
1 The group partially hedges these exposures.
The following table provides information regarding the aggregated credit risk exposure of Liberty to debt instruments categorised by credit ratings, if available, as at 31 December:
| A- and above Rm |
BBB+ Rm |
BBB Rm |
BBB Rm |
BB+ Rm |
BB Rm |
BB- and below Rm |
Not rated Rm |
Pooled funds Rm |
Total Rm |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | ||||||||||
| Debt instruments | 13 569 | 5 035 | 25 461 | 30 460 | 52 658 | 13 392 | 4 454 | 4 599 | 149 628 | |
| Investment policies | 2 330 | 913 | 3 243 | |||||||
| Prepayments, insurance | ||||||||||
| and other receivables Mutual funds – interest |
816 | 3 863 | 4 679 | |||||||
| bearing instruments | 22 392 | 22 392 | ||||||||
| Reinsurance assets | 1 953 | 456 | 2 409 | |||||||
| Derivatives and collateral | ||||||||||
| deposits | 2 857 | 453 | 1 664 | 2 072 | 505 | 2 307 | 145 | 10 003 | ||
| Cash and cash equivalents | 5 066 | 84 | 1 030 | 8 198 | 306 | 1 901 | 792 | 17 377 | ||
| Total assets bearing | ||||||||||
| credit risk | 24 261 | 5 572 | 28 155 | 43 060 | 53 469 | 17 600 | 4 454 | 10 768 | 22 392 | 209 731 |
| 2018 | ||||||||||
| Debt instruments | 15 514 | 4 248 | 31 637 | 29 429 | 36 088 | 11 121 | 5 523 | 4 944 | 138 504 | |
| Investment policies | 8 208 | 1 254 | 9 462 | |||||||
| Prepayments, insurance | ||||||||||
| and other receivables | 514 | 82 | 29 | 395 | 3 933 | 4 953 | ||||
| Mutual funds – interest bearing instruments |
17 338 | 17 338 | ||||||||
| Reinsurance assets | 1 654 | 35 | 430 | 2 119 | ||||||
| Derivatives and collateral | ||||||||||
| deposits | 2 508 | 284 | 2 551 | 1 398 | 3 572 | 27 | 10 340 | |||
| Cash and cash equivalents | 3 782 | 452 | 4 155 | 5 712 | 14 | 2 316 | 384 | 159 | 16 974 | |
| Total assets bearing | ||||||||||
| credit risk | 23 972 | 5 066 | 38 407 | 45 142 | 36 102 | 17 009 | 5 907 | 10 747 | 17 338 | 199 690 |
1 As reported by Liberty, Refer to Liberty's annual financial statements.
The table below breaks down Liberty's assets according to time to liquidate. It is worth noting that, in a stressed environment, the market value of these assets is likely to be negatively affected.
| 2019 | 2018 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| % | Rm | % | Rm | ||
| Liquid2 | 75 | 343 091 | 74 | 321 472 | |
| Medium3 | 15 | 69 302 | 16 | 67 279 | |
| Illiquid4 | 10 | 45 720 | 10 | 44 788 | |
| Total | 100 | 458 113 | 100 | 433 539 |
1 As reported by Liberty. Refer to Liberty's annual financial statements.
2 Liquid assets are those that are considered to be realisable within one month (for example, cash, listed equities and term deposits).
3 Medium assets are those that are considered to be realisable within six months (for example, unlisted equities and certain unlisted term deposits).
4 Illiquid assets are those that are considered to be realisable in excess of six months (for example, investment properties and policyholder assets).
The table below summarises the maturity profile of Liberty's financial instrument liabilities based on the remaining undiscounted contractual obligations. These figures will be higher than amounts disclosed in the statement of financial position (where the effect of discounting is taken into account) except for short duration liabilities. Policyholder liabilities under investment contracts, investment contracts with DPF and insurance contracts are shown in a separate table.
| Zero to three months2 Rm |
Three to 12 months Rm |
One to five years Rm |
Five to ten years Rm |
Variable Rm |
Total Rm |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | ||||||
| Subordinated notes | 140 | 1 363 | 4 676 | 1 087 | 7 266 | |
| Redeemable preference shares3 | 5 | 5 | ||||
| Loan facilities | 195 | 2 567 | 2 762 | |||
| Third-party financial liabilities arising | ||||||
| on consolidation of mutual funds | 56 758 | 56 758 | ||||
| Repurchase agreements | 5 002 | 927 | 5 929 | |||
| Collateral deposits payable | 6 545 | 6 545 | ||||
| Insurance and other payables | 12 804 | 311 | 13 115 | |||
| Total | 81 249 | 2 796 | 7 243 | 1 087 | 5 | 92 380 |
| 2018 | ||||||
| Subordinated notes | 173 | 378 | 4 972 | 2 398 | 7 921 | |
| Commercial paper | 811 | 811 | ||||
| Redeemable preference shares3 | 5 | 5 | ||||
| Loan facilities | 745 | 1 573 | 2 318 | |||
| Third-party financial liabilities arising | ||||||
| on consolidation of mutual funds | 48 186 | 48 186 | ||||
| Repurchase agreements | 5 135 | 649 | 5 784 | |||
| Collateral deposits payable | 5 976 | 5 976 | ||||
| Insurance and other payables | 11 568 | 347 | 54 | 2 | 11 971 | |
| Total | 71 849 | 2 119 | 6 599 | 2 400 | 5 | 82 972 |
1 As reported by Liberty. Refer to Liberty's annual financial statements.
2 Zero to three months are either due within the time-frame or are payable on demand.
3 No fixed maturity date; however, redeemable with a two-year notice period at the instance of Liberty or the holder.
The tables that follow provide an indication of liquidity needs in respect of cash flows required to meet obligations arising under long-term insurance business.
Undiscounted cash flows are shown and the effect of discounting is taken into account to reconcile to total policyholder contract values.
| Insurance contracts | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Policyholder liabilities Rm |
Policyholder assets Rm |
Reinsurance assets and liabilities Rm |
Investment contracts with DPF2 Rm |
Investment contracts Rm |
|
| 2019 | |||||
| Investment-linked liabilities | |||||
| Within 1 year | 16 755 | 515 | 6 759 | ||
| 1 – 5 years | 58 865 | (137) | 12 168 | ||
| 5 – 10 years | 16 766 | 980 | 11 936 | ||
| 10 – 20 years | 33 439 | 2 781 | 25 117 | ||
| Over 20 years | 32 871 | 6 113 | 49 058 | ||
| Total investment-linked liabilities | 158 696 | 10 252 | 105 038 | ||
| Non-investment-linked liabilities/(assets) | |||||
| Within 1 year | 4 629 | (2 357) | (419) | 559 | |
| 1 – 5 years | 25 971 | (6 704) | (882) | 1 101 | |
| 5 – 10 years | 15 321 | (3 700) | (777) | 2 034 | |
| 10 – 20 years | 27 620 | 3 431 | (730) | 21 | |
| Over 20 years | 65 742 | 67 759 | 1 605 | 26 | |
| Effect of discounting cash flows | (91 876) | (65 446) | (542) | (888) | |
| Total non-investment-linked liabilities/(assets) | 47 407 | (7 017) | (1 745) | 2 853 | |
| Total long-term insurance business liabilities/ (assets) |
206 103 | (7 017) | (1 745) | 10 252 | 107 891 |
| Total surrender value of long-term insurance policyholder liabilities |
170 208 | 9 999 | 107 585 | ||
| 2018 | |||||
| Investment-linked liabilities | |||||
| Within 1 year | 15 569 | 226 | 4 679 | ||
| 1 – 5 years | 57 136 | (314) | 8 251 | ||
| 5 – 10 years | 14 770 | 1 004 | 8 057 | ||
| 10 – 20 years | 32 979 | 1 785 | 20 633 | ||
| Over 20 years | 35 851 | 7 736 | 55 346 | ||
| Total investment-linked liabilities | 156 305 | 10 437 | 96 966 | ||
| Non-investment-linked liabilities/(assets) | |||||
| Within 1 year | 5 187 | (2 332) | (349) | 584 | |
| 1 – 5 years | 22 887 | (6 416) | (701) | 1 266 | |
| 5 – 10 years | 14 470 | (3 548) | (633) | 2 054 | |
| 10 – 20 years | 25 814 | 3 063 | (586) | 30 | |
| Over 20 years | 61 980 | 62 905 | 969 | 36 | |
| Effect of discounting cash flows | (85 899) | (60 380) | (116) | (1 123) | |
| Total non-investment-linked liabilities/(assets) | 44 439 | (6 708) | (1 416) | 2 847 | |
| Total long-term insurance business liabilities/ (assets) |
200 744 | (6 708) | (1 416) | 10 437 | 99 813 |
| Total surrender value of long-term insurance policyholder liabilities |
166 589 | 10 405 | 99 545 |
1 As reported by Liberty. Refer to Liberty's annual financial statements.
2 DPF refers to discretionary participation features.
The table below summarises Liberty's exposure to financial, property and insurance assets. This exposure has been split into the relevant market risk categories and then attributed to the effective holders of the risk.
| Attributable to | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total assets Rm |
Long-term policyholder investment linked (including DPF) liabilities Rm |
Other policyholder liabilities5 Rm |
Third-party financial liabilities arising on con solidation of mutual funds Rm |
Non controlling interests Rm |
Residual liabilities and share holders' interest Rm |
||
| 2019 | |||||||
| Assets subject to market risk only | 241 365 | 194 554 | (5 743) | 31 885 | 7 817 | 12 852 | |
| Equity price Property price2 Mixed portfolios excluding |
130 831 39 179 |
108 065 25 074 |
(4 040) (248) |
20 810 5 636 |
7 817 | 5 996 900 |
|
| investment policies3 | 71 355 | 61 415 | (1 455) | 5 439 | 5 956 | ||
| Assets subject to market and credit risk |
209 731 | 93 361 | 42 320 | 24 873 | 504 | 48 673 | |
| Interest rate Investment policies in mixed portfolios Reinsurance assets4 Equity derivatives |
203 103 3 243 2 409 976 |
89 142 3 243 976 |
40 329 1 991 |
24 873 | 504 | 48 255 418 |
|
| Long-term policyholder assets Other assets |
7 017 3 561 |
7 017 3 561 |
|||||
| Total | 461 674 | 287 915 | 36 577 | 56 758 | 8 321 | 72 103 | |
| Percentage (%) | 62.4 | 7.9 | 12.3 | 1.8 | 15.6 | ||
| 2018 | |||||||
| Assets subject to market risk only | 227 141 | 190 541 | (7 136) | 24 103 | 7 883 | 11 750 | |
| Equity price Property price2 Mixed portfolios excluding |
123 673 39 139 |
108 886 23 856 |
(4 038) (287) |
13 498 6 657 |
7 883 | 5 327 1 030 |
|
| investment policies3 | 64 329 | 57 799 | (2 811) | 3 948 | 5 393 | ||
| Assets subject to market and credit risk |
199 690 | 84 156 | 43 716 | 24 083 | 507 | 47 228 | |
| Interest rate Investment policies in mixed portfolios |
187 316 9 462 |
73 901 9 462 |
42 017 | 24 083 | 507 | 46 808 | |
| Reinsurance assets4 Equity derivatives |
2 119 793 |
793 | 1 699 | 420 | |||
| Long-term policyholder assets Other assets |
6 708 3 735 |
6 708 3 735 |
|||||
| Total | 437 274 | 274 697 | 36 580 | 48 186 | 8 390 | 69 421 | |
| Percentage (%) | 62.8 | 8.4 | 11.0 | 1.9 | 15.9 |
1 As reported by Liberty. Refer to Liberty's annual financial statements.
2 Equity price risk is included in property price risk where the invested entity only has exposure to investment properties. Property company debt of R5 327 million (2018: R5 300 million) is included in the interest rate risk line.
3 Mixed portfolios are subject to a combination of equity price, interest rate and property price risks depending on each portfolio's construction. A substantial portion of the mixed portfolios will be subject to equity price and interest rate risk. The exact proportion is practically difficult to accurately calculate given the number of mutual funds and hedge funds contained in the group portfolios.
4 Reinsurance assets are claims against reinsurers outstanding at the reporting date. They are not subject to market risk other than time value of money (interest rate) for the periods to settlement.
5 Negative exposure to the various risk categories can occur in other policyholder liabilities since the present value of future charges can exceed the present value of future benefits and expenses resulting in a negative liability. The group offsets these negative liabilities against policyholders' market-related liabilities. The policyholders' market risk exposure, however, remains unchanged. Hence, shareholders bear all the risks of shorting assets backing the policyholder investment-linked liabilities by the amount of these negative liabilities.
The table below provides additional detail on financial instrument assets and liabilities and their specific interest rate exposure. Due to practical considerations, interest rate risk details contained in investments in non-subsidiary mutual funds and investment policies are not provided. Accounts receivable and accounts payable, where settlement is expected within 90 days, are not included in the analysis. The effect of interest rate risk on these balances is not considered significant given the short-term duration of the underlying cash flows.
| Carrying value | 2019 Rm |
2018 Rm |
|---|---|---|
| Financial instruments liabilities | 20 261 | 19 846 |
| Exposed to cash flow interest rate risk Exposed to fair value interest rate risk |
18 284 1 977 |
18 369 1 477 |
| Financial instruments assets | 169 269 | 159 583 |
| Exposed to cash flow interest rate risk Exposed to fair value interest rate risk |
103 109 66 160 |
91 242 68 341 |
1 As reported by Liberty. Refer to Liberty's annual financial statements.
Liberty's direct exposure to property market risk is shown below:
| 2019 Rm |
2018 Rm |
|
|---|---|---|
| Investment properties Owner-occupied properties |
34 682 1 612 |
34 316 1 645 |
| Gross direct exposure Attributable to non-controlling interests |
36 294 (8 313) |
35 961 (7 884) |
| Net exposure | 27 981 | 28 077 |
| Concentration use risk within directly held properties is summarised below: Shopping malls Office buildings Other property (shares in Melrose Arch precinct, Sandton Sun and Towers, Garden Court Sandton City, and the Sandton Convention Centre) |
29 664 2 493 4 137 |
29 520 2 439 4 002 |
| Total | 36 294 | 35 961 |
1 As reported by Liberty. Refer to Liberty's annual financial statements.
The table below provides a description of the sensitivities that are provided on market risk assumptions:
| Market risk variable | Description of sensitivity |
|---|---|
| Interest yield curve | A parallel shift in the interest rate yield curve |
| Implied option volatilities | A change in the implied short-term equity, property and interest rate option volatility assumptions |
| Equity prices | A change in the local and foreign equity prices |
| Rand exchange rates | A change in the ZAR exchange rate to all applicable currencies |
The equity price and rand currency sensitivities are applied as an instantaneous event at the financial position date with no change to long-term market assumptions used in the measurement of policyholder contract values. In other words, the assets are instantaneously impacted by the sensitivity on the financial position date. The new asset levels are applied to the measurement of policyholder contract values, where applicable, but no changes are made to the prospective assumptions used in the measurement of policyholder contract values.
The interest rate yield curve and implied option volatility sensitivities are applied similarly but the assumptions used in the measurement of policyholder contract values that are dependent on interest rate yield curves and implied option volatilities are updated.
The market sensitivities are applied to all assets held by Liberty (and not just assets backing the policyholder contract values). Each sensitivity is applied in isolation with all other assumptions left unchanged.
The table below summarises the impact of the change in the aforementioned risk variables on policyholders' contract values and on ordinary shareholders' equity and attributable profit after taxation. The market risk sensitivities are net of risk mitigation activities. Consequently the comparability to the previous year is impacted by the level of risk mitigation at the respective financial position dates.
| 2019 | 2018 | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Change in variable % |
Gross of reinsurance impact on policy holders' contract values Rm |
Net of reinsurance impact on policy holders' contract values Rm |
Impact on equity and attri butable profit after taxation Rm |
Change in variable % |
Gross of reinsurance impact on policy holders' contract values Rm |
Net of reinsurance impact on policy holders' contract values Rm |
Impact on equity and attri butable profit after taxation Rm |
||||
| Market assumptions Interest rate yield curve |
12 | (6 438) | (6 494) | (362) | 12 | (6 119) | (6 162) | (357) | |||
| (12) | 7 849 | 7 891 | 264 | (12) | 7 540 | 7 573 | 239 | ||||
| Option price volatilities |
20 (20) |
49 (26) |
49 (26) |
(9) (4) |
20 (20) |
61 (45) |
61 (45) |
(21) 11 |
|||
| Equity prices | 15 (15) |
21 869 (22 145) |
21 868 (22 145) |
1 364 (1 249) |
15 (15) |
21 810 (21 853) |
21 810 (21 853) |
1 528 (1 481) |
|||
| Rand exchange rates Rand exchange rates |
122 (12)3 |
(6 476) 6 490 |
(6 476) 6 490 |
(641) 681 |
122 (12)3 |
(5 924) 5 940 |
(5 924) 5 940 |
(563) 681 |
1 As reported by Liberty. Refer to Liberty's annual financial statements.
2 Strengthening of the rand.
3 Weakening of the rand.
The table below provides a description of the sensitivities that are provided on insurance risk assumptions:
| Insurance risk variable | Description of sensitivity |
|---|---|
| Assurance mortality | A level percentage change in the expected future mortality rates on assurance contracts |
| Annuitant longevity | A level percentage change in the expected future mortality rates on annuity contracts |
| Morbidity | A level percentage change in the expected future morbidity rates |
| Withdrawal | A level percentage change in the expected future withdrawal rates |
| Expense per policy | A level percentage change in the expected maintenance expenses |
The table below summarises the impact of the change in the insurance risk variables on policyholders' contract values and on ordinary shareholders' equity and attributable profit after taxation:
| 2019 | 2018 | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Change in variable |
Gross of reinsurance impact on policy holders' contract values |
Net of reinsurance impact on policy holders' contract values |
Impact on equity and attri butable profit after taxation |
Change in variable |
Gross of reinsurance impact on policy holders' contract values |
Net of reinsurance impact on policy holders' contract values |
Impact on equity and attri butable profit after taxation |
|
| % | Rm | Rm | Rm | % | Rm | Rm | Rm | |
| Insurance assumptions |
||||||||
| Mortality | ||||||||
| Assured lives | 2 | 497 | 403 | (290) | 2 | 464 | 379 | (273) |
| (2) | (499) | (404) | 291 | (2) | (466) | (380) | 274 | |
| Annuitant longevity | 42 | 396 | 396 | (285) | 42 | 392 | 392 | (282) |
| (4)3 | (386) | (386) | 278 | (4)3 | (375) | (375) | 270 | |
| Morbidity | 5 | 803 | 658 | (474) | 5 | 764 | 628 | (452) |
| (5) | (798) | (655) | 472 | (5) | (759) | (625) | 450 | |
| Withdrawals | 8 | 492 | 503 | (361) | 8 | 502 | 509 | (366) |
| (8) | (530) | (542) | 389 | (8) | (543) | (552) | 396 | |
| Expense per policy | 5 | 445 | 445 | (322) | 5 | 420 | 420 | (305) |
| (5) | (445) | (444) | 322 | (5) | (420) | (420) | 305 |
1 As reported by Liberty. Refer to Liberty's annual financial statements.
2 Annuitant life expectancy increases, i.e. annuitant mortality reduces.
3 Annuitant life expectancy reduces, i.e. annuitant mortality increases.
The group's share incentive schemes enable key management personnel and senior employees to benefit from the performance of the group and group companies' share price. For further detail regarding the share schemes refer to the group's governance and remuneration report.
| 2019 Rm |
2018 Rm |
|
|---|---|---|
| Expenses recognised in staff cost | ||
| Equity Growth Scheme | 8 | 21 |
| Share Appreciation Rights Scheme | 36 | 20 |
| Quanto Stock Scheme | 15 | |
| Deferred Bonus Scheme | 1 280 | 1 257 |
| Performance Reward Plan | 245 | 427 |
| Cash-Settled Deferred Bonus Scheme | 385 | 371 |
| Liberty Share Incentive Scheme | 135 | 94 |
| Total | 2 089 | 2 205 |
| Summary of liabilities recognised in other liabilities | ||
| Share Appriciation Rights Scheme | 3 | 2 |
| Deferred Bonus Scheme | 16 | 157 |
| Performance Reward Plan | 58 | 216 |
| Cash-Settled Deferred Bonus Scheme | 375 | 373 |
| Total | 452 | 748 |
The EGS is an equity-settled scheme and represents appreciation rights allocated to employees. The converted value of the rights is effectively settled by issue of shares equivalent to the value of the rights. The scheme has five different subtypes of vesting categories as illustrated by the table below:
| Year | % vesting | Expiry | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vesting categories | |||
| Type A | 3, 4, 5 | 50, 75, 100 | 10 years |
| Type B | 5, 6, 7 | 50, 75, 100 | 10 years |
| Type C | 2, 3, 4 | 50, 75, 100 | 10 years |
| Type D | 2, 3, 4 | 33, 67, 100 | 10 years |
| Type E | 3, 4, 5 | 33, 67, 100 | 10 years |
A reconciliation of the movement of share options is detailed below:
| Number of rights | Average price range (R) |
||
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | 2018 | 2019 | |
| Movement summary | |||
| Rights outstanding at beginning of the year | 7 364 238 | 10 772 081 | |
| Exercised | (2 382 033) | (3 390 508) | 62.39 – 156.96 |
| Lapsed/forfeited | (40 938) | (17 335) | 62.39 – 114.69 |
| Rights outstanding at the end of the year | 4 941 267 | 7 364 238 |
During 2019, 801 345 (2018: 1 417 128) SBG shares were issued to settle the appreciated rights value. At the end of the year, the group would need to issue 1 379 838 (2018: 2 557 500) SBG shares to settle the outstanding appreciated rights value. The EGS rights are only awarded to individuals in the employment of a group entity domiciled in South Africa.
The group is required to ensure that employees' tax arising from benefits due in terms of the scheme is paid in accordance with the Fourth Schedule of the Income Tax Act of South Africa. Where employees have elected not to fund the tax from their own resources the tax due is treated as a diminution of the gross benefits due under the scheme. No (2018: nil) SBG shares were issued and sold to settle the employees' tax due during the year. This reduces the liability to the employee in respect of the outstanding appreciated rights value. Share options were exercised regularly throughout the year. The weighted average share price for the year was R183.51 (2018: R195.35).
The following rights granted to employees, including executive directors, had not been exercised at year end:
| 2019 | 2018 | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Option expiry period | Number of ordinary shares |
Option price range (rand) |
Weighted average price (rand) |
Number of ordinary shares |
Option price range (rand) |
Weighted average price (rand) |
|
| Year to 31 December 2019 | 219 475 | 62.39 – 95.50 | 64.58 | ||||
| Year to 31 December 2020 | 866 419 | 62.39 – 114.69 | 107.14 | 2 002 713 | 102.39 – 114.69 | 111.83 | |
| Year to 31 December 2021 | 1 158 593 | 96.68 – 103.03 | 98.94 | 1 821 026 | 96.68 – 103.03 | 98.93 | |
| Year to 31 December 2022 | 192 825 | 98.75 – 108.90 | 107.16 | 225 962 | 98.75 – 108.90 | 107.42 | |
| Year to 31 December 2023 | 245 761 | 115.51 | 115.51 | 250 761 | 115.51 | 115.51 | |
| Year to 31 December 2024 | 472 533 | 126.87 | 126.87 | 517 886 | 126.87 | 126.87 | |
| Year to 31 December 2025 | 1 001 291 | 156.96 | 156.96 | 1 095 029 | 156.96 | 156.96 | |
| Year to 31 December 2026 | 1 003 845 | 122.24 | 122.24 | 1 231 386 | 122.24 | 122.24 | |
| Total | 4 941 267 | 7 364 238 |
The SARP is a long term scheme and represents appreciation rights awarded to employees and is based on the SBG's share price. Awards that are issued to individuals in the employment of a group entity domiciled in South Africa are classified as equity-settled and awards made to individuals of a group entity outside of South Africa are classified as cash-settled. Vesting and expiry of the rights are as follows:
| Year | % vesting | Expiry | |
|---|---|---|---|
| SARP | 2, 3, 4 | 33, 67, 100 | 4, 5, 6 |
The converted value of the rights is settled either by purchasing shares for equity-settled awards on an external market and in cash for cash-settled awards equal to the value of the converted rights.
A reconciliation of the movement of share options is detailed below:
| 2019 | 2018 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Average price range (rand) |
Number of rights |
Average price range (rand) |
Number of rights |
||
| SARP | |||||
| Rights outstanding at the end of the year | 1 433 856 | 671 923 | |||
| Granted1 | 182.43 | 1 332 940 | 220.97 | 761 933 | |
| Exercised | (73 332) | ||||
| Lapsed/forfeited | (6 550) | ||||
| Rights outstanding at the end of the year Comprising: |
2 686 914 | 1 433 856 | |||
| Outstanding equity-settled units | 2 487 823 | 1 302 257 | |||
| Outstanding cash-settled units | 199 091 | 131 599 |
1 Includes 1 215 820 (2018: 675 339) units that are equity-settled, the balance will be cashed-settled.
During the year, 7 761 (2018: nil) SBG shares were purchased from the market to settle the appreciation rights value.
At the end of the year, the group would need to purchase 44 052 (2018: 85 958) SBG shares to settle the outstanding appreciated rights value.
The following rights granted to employees, including executive directors, had not been exercised as at 31 December 2019:
| 2019 | 2018 | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Option expiry period | Number of rights |
Option price range (rand) |
Weighted average price (rand) |
Number of rights |
Option price range (rand) |
Weighted average price (rand) |
|
| Year to 31 December 2021 | 150 635 | 155.95 | 155.95 | 223 967 | 155.95 | 155.95 | |
| Year to 31 December 2022 | 475 737 | 155.95 – 220.97 | 190.36 | 477 920 | 155.95 – 220.97 | 190.50 | |
| Year to 31 December 2023 | 920 046 | 155.95 – 220.97 | 186.53 | 477 942 | 155.95 – 220.97 | 190.50 | |
| Year to 31 December 2024 | 696 130 | 182.43 – 220.97 | 196.37 | 254 027 | 220.97 | 220.97 | |
| Year to 31 December 2025 | 444 366 | 182.43 | 182.43 | ||||
| Total | 2 686 914 | 1 433 856 |
The share appreciation rights granted during the year were valued using a Black-Scholes option pricing model. Each grant was valued separately. The weighted fair value of the options granted per vesting and the assumptions utilised are illustrated below:
| 2019 | 2018 | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tranche 1 | Tranche 2 | Tranche 3 | Tranche 1 | Tranche 2 | Tranche 3 | |
| Number of appreciation rights granted | 444 287 | 444 287 | 444 366 | 253 953 | 253 953 | 254 027 |
| Weighted average fair value at grant date (rands) | 27.24 | 33.43 | 38.52 | 52.90 | 58.66 | 63.13 |
| The principal inputs are as follows: | ||||||
| Weighted average share price (rand) | 182.43 | 182.43 | 182.43 | 220.97 | 220.97 | 220.97 |
| Weighted average exercise price (rand) | 182.43 | 182.43 | 182.43 | 220.97 | 220.97 | 220.97 |
| Expected life (years) | 4.00 | 5.00 | 6.00 | 4.00 | 5.00 | 6.00 |
| Expected volatility (%) | 30.77 | 30.77 | 30.77 | 29.19 | 29.19 | 29.19 |
| Risk-free interest rate (%) | 6.79 | 7.0 | 7.13 | 8.21 | 8.40 | 8.55 |
| Dividend yield (%) | 4.76 | 4.59 | 4.49 | 4.60 | 4.48 | 4.42 |
All employees granted an annual performance award over a threshold have part of their award deferred. The awards are indexed to the group's share price and accrue notional dividends during the vesting period, which are payable on vesting. Awards vest in three equal amounts at 18 months, 30 months and 42 months from the date of award. The final payout is determined with reference to the group's share price on vesting date. These awards have been partially hedged through the use of equity forwards.
Awards that are issued to individuals in employment of a group entity domiciled in South Africa are classified as equity-settled and awards that are made to individuals of a group entity outside of South Africa are classified as cash-settled.
| Units | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | 2018 | ||
| Movement summary | |||
| Units outstanding at beginning of the year | 13 319 512 | 14 353 804 | |
| Units granted during the year1 | 7 069 071 | 5 912 386 | |
| Exercised | (6 936 960) | (6 337 114) | |
| Lapsed/forfeited | (511 040) | (609 564) | |
| Units outstanding at end of the year | 12 940 583 | 13 319 512 | |
| Outstanding equity-settled units | 12 725 473 | 12 757 885 | |
| Outstanding cash-settled units | 215 110 | 561 627 | |
| Weighted average fair value at grant date (R) | 182.54 | 218.68 | |
| Expected life (years) | 2.51 | 2.51 |
1 Includes 6 979 195 (2018: 5 834 741) units that are equity-settled, the balance relates to cash-settled rewards.
The PRP is a performance-driven share plan which rewards value delivered against specific targets. The PRP incentivises a group of senior executives to meet the strategic long-term objectives that deliver value to shareholders, to align the interests of those executives with those of shareholders and to act as an attraction and retention mechanism in a highly competitive marketplace for skills. The PRP operates alongside the existing conditional, equity-settled long-term plans, namely the EGS, DBS, and other share incentive schemes.
The awards that are indexed to the group's share price and accrue notional dividends during the vesting period, are payable on vesting. Shares that vest (if any), and that are delivered to the employee, are conditional on the pre-specified performance metrics. These awards have been partially hedged through the use of equity forwards.
Awards that are issued to individuals in employment of a group entity domiciled in South Africa are classified as equity-settled and awards made to individuals of a group entity outside of South Africa are classified as cash-settled.
| Units | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | 2018 | ||
| Movement summary | |||
| Units outstanding at beginning of the year | 7 626 856 | 7 517 975 | |
| Units granted during the year1 | 2 908 816 | 2 210 428 | |
| Exercised | (3 165 142) | (2 456 539) | |
| Performance condition uplift for awards vested during the year | 302 966 | 360 294 | |
| Lapsed/forfeited | (137 071) | (5 302) | |
| Units outstanding at the end of the year | 7 536 425 | 7 626 856 | |
| Outstanding equity-settled units | 6 748 300 | 6 500 064 | |
| Outstanding cash-settled units | 788 125 | 1 126 792 | |
| Weighted average fair value at grant date (R) | 182.43 | 220.97 | |
| Expected life (years) | 3.07 | 3.07 |
1 Includes 2 626 716 (2018: 1 947 028) units that are equity-settled, the balance relates to cash-settled rewards.
Effective for awards made in 2017, employees granted an annual performance award over a threshold and who are in employment of the group and meet other specific criteria have part of their award deferred.
Awards in rand are indexed to SBG's share price and accrues notional dividends during the vesting period, which are payable on vesting. Awards vest in three equal amounts at 18, 30 and 42 months from the date of the award. The maturity value is determined with reference to the SBG share price on the vesting date. These awards are classified as cash-settled from a group perspective. Awards in currencies other than rand (being the employee's host country) are denominated in that currency with the same terms as rand-denominated awards with the value of the awards, in foreign currency, moving in parallel with changes in the SBG share price. These awards have been partially hedged through the use of equity forwards.
| 2019 | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Currency | Weighted average fair value at grant date |
Expected life at grant date (years) |
Opening balance |
Granted | Exercised | Lapsed | Outstanding |
| AOA | 182.43 | 2.51 | 317 955 | 491 380 | (61 860) | (226 438) | 521 037 |
| BWP | 182.43 | 2.51 | 29 867 | 22 519 | (12 033) | 40 353 | |
| CNY | 182.43 | 2.51 | 50 568 | 35 787 | (24 937) | 61 418 | |
| EUR | 182.43 | 2.51 | 46 | 47 | (93) | ||
| GBP | 182.43 | 2.51 | 71 459 | 41 097 | (35 408) | (3 619) | 73 529 |
| GHS | 182.43 | 2.51 | 11 045 | 10 981 | (4 552) | 17 474 | |
| HKD | 182.43 | 2.51 | 48 970 | 18 784 | (32 058) | 35 696 | |
| KES | 182.43 | 2.51 | 764 139 | 475 785 | (305 594) | 934 330 | |
| LSL | 182.43 | 2.51 | 12 665 | 4 496 | (5 024) | (5 456) | 6 681 |
| MUR | 182.43 | 2.51 | 81 919 | 67 671 | (32 494) | 117 096 | |
| MWK | 182.43 | 2.51 | 1 159 039 | 698 544 | (389 174) | (201 659) | 1 266 750 |
| MZN | 182.43 | 2.51 | 151 942 | 118 612 | (57 224) | (6 534) | 206 796 |
| NAD | 182.43 | 2.51 | 42 481 | 24 446 | (15 928) | (4 913) | 46 086 |
| NGN | 182.43 | 2.51 | 7 963 322 | 5 210 031 | (3 233 749) | (307 890) | 9 631 714 |
| SGD | 182.43 | 2.51 | 2 036 | 8 536 | (678) | 9 894 | |
| SZL | 182.43 | 2.51 | 12 289 | 9 765 | (4 743) | 17 311 | |
| TZS | 182.43 | 2.51 | 208 177 | 235 708 | (69 391) | 374 494 | |
| UGX | 182.43 | 2.51 | 15 401 002 | 11 957 204 | (6 293 547) | (82 224) | 20 982 435 |
| USD | 182.43 | 2.51 | 37 586 | 21 227 | (19 206) | (411) | 39 196 |
| XOF | 182.43 | 2.51 | 292 392 | 124 454 | (138 808) | 278 038 | |
| ZAR | 182.43 | 2.51 | 1 381 670 | 565 604 | (550 034) | (20 771) | 1 376 469 |
| ZMW | 182.43 | 2.51 | 21 930 | 15 383 | (8 702) | (428) | 28 183 |
| Scheme | Description | Classification | Stock symbol | 2019 Outstanding units |
2018 Outstanding units |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Liberty Holdings Group Restricted Share Plan |
During 2012, Liberty introduced the Liberty Holding Group Restricted Share Plan which has two methods of participation: 1) Long-term plan awards granted prior to 28 February 2013 vest 33 1/3% at the end of year two, three and four respectively while awards granted subsequently vest 33 1/3% at the end of year three, four and five respectively. 2) Deferred-plan – Awards vest 33 1/3% at the end of 18 months, 30 months and 42 months respectively. |
Equity-settled scheme |
LBH | 4 223 461 | 4 341 587 |
| Nigeria Share Schemes |
On 1 March 2010 and 1 March 2011, share appreciation rights were issued to key management personnel. The scheme has various vesting periods, and expires ten years after grant date. |
Cash-settled scheme |
IBTCCB: NL | 14 510 640 | 24 253 104 |
| Group Share Incentive Scheme (GSIS) |
GSIS confers rights to employees to acquire shares at the value of the SBG share price at the date the option was granted. The scheme has various vesting periods, and expires ten years after grant date. During the year, 393 985 (2018: 312 444) SBG shares were issued to settle the GSIS awards. |
Equity-settled scheme |
SBK | 275 121 | 696 115 |
| 2018 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Opening | ||||
| Outstanding | Lapsed | Exercised | Granted | balance |
| 317 955 | (42 106) | 233 735 | 126 326 | |
| 29 867 | (972) | (6 466) | 17 896 | 19 409 |
| 50 568 | (16 541) | 25 188 | 41 921 | |
| 46 | 46 | |||
| 71 459 | (3 003) | (25 573) | 33 804 | 66 231 |
| 11 045 | (65) | (2 657) | 5 713 | 8 054 |
| 48 970 | (20 313) | 17 009 | 52 274 | |
| 764 139 | (36 741) | (177 790) | 421 129 | 557 541 |
| 12 665 | (2 414) | 7 831 | 7 248 | |
| 81 919 | (15 580) | 50 754 | 46 745 | |
| 1 159 039 | (265 737) | 627 553 | 797 223 | |
| 151 942 | (25 705) | 100 510 | 77 137 | |
| 42 481 | (11 103) | 20 267 | 33 317 | |
| 7 963 322 | (135 203) | (1 359 793) | 4 664 095 | 4 794 223 |
| 2 036 | 2 036 | |||
| 12 289 | (2 603) | (1 954) | 9 053 | 7 793 |
| 208 177 | 208 177 | |||
| 15 401 002 | (1 342 759) | (3 479 691) | 8 758 390 | 11 465 062 |
| 37 586 | (343) | (13 568) | 17 187 | 34 310 |
| 292 392 | (80 029) | 195 506 | 176 915 | |
| 1 381 670 | (5 904) | (304 437) | 773 271 | 918 740 |
| 21 930 | (4 851) | 12 216 | 14 565 |
Cash-Settled Deferred Bonus Scheme (CSDBS)
the group and meet other specific criteria have part of their award deferred.
Scheme Description Classification Stock symbol
Equity-settled scheme
Cash-settled scheme
Equity-settled scheme
During 2012, Liberty introduced the Liberty Holding Group Restricted Share Plan which has two methods of participation: 1) Long-term plan awards granted prior to 28 February 2013 vest 33 1/3% at the end of year two, three and four respectively while awards granted subsequently vest 33 1/3% at the end of year three, four and five respectively. 2) Deferred-plan – Awards vest 33 1/3% at the end of 18 months, 30 months
On 1 March 2010 and 1 March 2011, share appreciation rights were issued to key management personnel. The scheme has various vesting periods, and expires ten
GSIS confers rights to employees to acquire shares at the value of the SBG share price at the date the option was granted. The scheme has various vesting periods, and expires ten years after grant date. During the year, 393 985 (2018: 312 444) SBG shares were issued to settle
and 42 months respectively.
years after grant date.
the GSIS awards.
partially hedged through the use of equity forwards.
Other share schemes
Liberty Holdings Group Restricted Share Plan
Nigeria Share Schemes
Group Share Incentive Scheme (GSIS)
Effective for awards made in 2017, employees granted an annual performance award over a threshold and who are in employment of
2019 Outstanding units
LBH 4 223 461 4 341 587
IBTCCB: NL 14 510 640 24 253 104
SBK 275 121 696 115
2018 Outstanding units
Awards in rand are indexed to SBG's share price and accrues notional dividends during the vesting period, which are payable on vesting. Awards vest in three equal amounts at 18, 30 and 42 months from the date of the award. The maturity value is determined with reference to the SBG share price on the vesting date. These awards are classified as cash-settled from a group perspective. Awards in currencies other than rand (being the employee's host country) are denominated in that currency with the same terms as rand-denominated awards with the value of the awards, in foreign currency, moving in parallel with changes in the SBG share price. These awards have been
| SK Tshabalala | A Daehnke | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 R'000 |
2018 R'000 |
2019 R'000 |
2018 R'000 |
|
| Cost-to-Company package2 | 10 222 | 9 987 | 6 409 | 6 294 |
| Cash package paid during the year Retirement contributions paid during the year Other allowances |
8 781 1 235 206 |
8 636 1 222 129 |
5 648 702 59 |
5 570 704 20 |
| Once-off allowances/payments3 | 632 | 111 | ||
| Short-term incentive | 23 250 | 25 400 | 18 000 | 16 750 |
| Short-term incentive (cash)4 Short-term incentive (share-linked deferral)5 |
10 525 12 725 |
11 350 14 050 |
8 150 9 850 |
8 025 8 725 |
| Total reward (excluding conditional long-term incentive awards) PRP awards vesting6 PRP notional dividend7 |
33 472 13 499 2 225 |
36 019 20 228 2 818 |
24 409 7 558 1 246 |
23 155 11 330 1 578 |
| Total reward (including conditional long-term incentive awards) | 49 196 | 59 065 | 33 213 | 36 063 |
Refer to footnotes below.
| BJ Kruger8 | PL Schlebusch9 |
|
|---|---|---|
| 2018 R'000 |
2018 R'000 |
|
| Cost-to-company package2 | 9 906 | 1 786 |
| Cash package paid during the year Retirement contributions paid during the year Other allowances |
8 480 1 159 267 |
1 602 136 48 |
| Once-off allowances/payments3 | 3 022 | |
| Short-term incentive | 24 950 | 6 750 |
| Short-term incentive (cash)4 Short-term incentive (share-linked deferral)5 |
11 125 13 825 |
2 175 4 575 |
| Total reward (excluding conditional long-term incentive awards) | 37 878 | 8 536 |
| EGS conditional reflecting PRP reflecting6 PRP notional dividend reflecting7 |
20 228 2 818 |
19 781 1 403 |
| Total reward (including conditional long-term incentive awards) | 60 924 | 29 720 |
1 ZN Manyathi was appointed as a prescribed officer on 1 April 2018. His fixed remuneration is shown from that date. The short-term incentive is for the full performance year 2018.
2 No Cost to Company (CTC) increases were granted to executive directors and prescribed officers in March 2019. However the introduction of a permanent health insurance plan and the impact of reporting on CTC from January to December has resulted in small uplifts in CTC from 2018 to 2019.
3 Includes a once-off payment made in respect of Death in Service and Permanent Health Insurance benefits.
4 These are performance related short-term incentive payments in respect of the financial year under review.
5 These are deferred bonus scheme awards issued in March every year for the prior year performance period which are subject to choice. Participants can elect to have the value of the deferred awards, or part thereof, invested in the SARP rather than the default DBS. To the extent that the SARP is selected, a 10% premium of the value of the award is added. Deferred bonus amounts not invested in SARP will be unitised with respect to the group's closing share price the day results are announced. The award will be updated in the group's annual financial statements the following year to reflect the choices made and units/rights awarded.
6 PRP units vesting were awarded in March 2016 (disclosed for the performance year 2018) and in March 2017 (disclosed for the performance year 2019). The PRP value delivered is calculated based on the group's closing share price of R168.32 as at 31 December 2019 (R178.81 for 2018) after calculating the delivery percentage based on the 3 year performance conditions (100.0% delivery on the 2017 awards and 110.58% delivery on the 2016 awards). The amount included in the single figure will not be updated in the 2019 remuneration report but rather included at payment value in the settlement schedule.
7 PRP notional dividend is calculated by multiplying the vesting PRP units by the cumulative notional dividend incurred between the grant date and vesting date. The amount included in the single figure will not be updated in the 2019 remuneration report but rather included at payment value in the settlement schedule. 8 BJ Kruger retired from the group on 31 December 2018.
9 PL Schlebusch stepped down as a prescribed officer on 1 April 2018. His fixed remuneration and short-term incentive award disclosed is for the performance period 1 January to 31 March 2018.
| A Fihla | M Nienaber | Z N Manyathi1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 R'000 |
2018 R'000 |
2019 R'000 |
2018 R'000 |
2019 R'000 |
2018 R'000 |
| 7 734 | 7 588 | 6 431 | 6 257 | 7 520 | 5 634 |
| 6 628 855 251 |
6 506 853 229 |
5 571 640 220 |
5 497 589 171 |
6 735 600 185 |
5 039 467 128 |
| 710 | 78 | ||||
| 21 750 | 19 000 | 17 500 | 15 125 | 21 500 | 21 500 |
| 10 025 11 725 |
8 650 10 350 |
7 900 9 600 |
7 212 7 913 |
9 900 11 600 |
9 900 11 600 |
| 29 484 6 480 1 068 |
27 298 9 709 1 353 |
23 931 10 789 1 778 |
21 460 5 655 788 |
29 020 7 019 1 157 |
27 134 9 709 1 353 |
| 37 032 | 38 360 | 36 498 | 27 903 | 37 196 | 38 196 |
Executive directors' and prescribed officers' emoluments
Refer to footnotes below.
EGS conditional reflecting
performance year 2018.
8 BJ Kruger retired from the group on 31 December 2018.
period 1 January to 31 March 2018.
Executive directors' and prescribed officers' emoluments – former prescribed officers
Cost-to-company package2 9 906 1 786 Cash package paid during the year 8 480 1 602 Retirement contributions paid during the year 1 159 136 Other allowances 267 48
Short-term incentive 24 950 6 750 Short-term incentive (cash)4 11 125 2 175 Short-term incentive (share-linked deferral)5 13 825 4 575 Total reward (excluding conditional long-term incentive awards) 37 878 8 536
PRP reflecting6 20 228 19 781 PRP notional dividend reflecting7 2 818 1 403 Total reward (including conditional long-term incentive awards) 60 924 29 720 1 ZN Manyathi was appointed as a prescribed officer on 1 April 2018. His fixed remuneration is shown from that date. The short-term incentive is for the full
2 No Cost to Company (CTC) increases were granted to executive directors and prescribed officers in March 2019. However the introduction of a permanent health
5 These are deferred bonus scheme awards issued in March every year for the prior year performance period which are subject to choice. Participants can elect to have the value of the deferred awards, or part thereof, invested in the SARP rather than the default DBS. To the extent that the SARP is selected, a 10% premium of the value of the award is added. Deferred bonus amounts not invested in SARP will be unitised with respect to the group's closing share price the day results are announced. The award will be updated in the group's annual financial statements the following year to reflect the choices made and units/rights awarded. 6 PRP units vesting were awarded in March 2016 (disclosed for the performance year 2018) and in March 2017 (disclosed for the performance year 2019). The PRP value delivered is calculated based on the group's closing share price of R168.32 as at 31 December 2019 (R178.81 for 2018) after calculating the delivery percentage based on the 3 year performance conditions (100.0% delivery on the 2017 awards and 110.58% delivery on the 2016 awards). The amount
included in the single figure will not be updated in the 2019 remuneration report but rather included at payment value in the settlement schedule. 7 PRP notional dividend is calculated by multiplying the vesting PRP units by the cumulative notional dividend incurred between the grant date and vesting date. The amount included in the single figure will not be updated in the 2019 remuneration report but rather included at payment value in the settlement schedule.
9 PL Schlebusch stepped down as a prescribed officer on 1 April 2018. His fixed remuneration and short-term incentive award disclosed is for the performance
Once-off allowances/payments3 3 022
insurance plan and the impact of reporting on CTC from January to December has resulted in small uplifts in CTC from 2018 to 2019.
3 Includes a once-off payment made in respect of Death in Service and Permanent Health Insurance benefits. 4 These are performance related short-term incentive payments in respect of the financial year under review.
BJ Kruger8
2018 R'000
PL Schlebusch9
2018 R'000
| Fixed remuneration | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Services as directors of Standard Bank Group R'000 |
Standard Bank Group committee fees R'000 |
Services as directors of group subsidiaries R'000 |
Other benefits R'000 |
Total compensation for the year R'000 |
||
| TS Gcabashe1 | 2019 | 6 622 | 503 | 7 125 | ||
| 2018 | 6 622 | 503 | 7 125 | |||
| MA Erasmus2 | 2019 | 457 | 457 | 914 | ||
| 2018 | ||||||
| GJ Fraser-Moleketi | 2019 | 277 | 825 | 277 | 1 379 | |
| 2018 | 277 | 714 | 277 | 1 268 | ||
| H Hu | 2019 | 963 | 469 | 963 | 2 395 | |
| 2018 | 919 | 625 | 919 | 2 463 | ||
| GMB Kennealy | 2019 | 277 | 1 344 | 277 | 1 898 | |
| 2018 | 277 | 1 195 | 277 | 1 749 | ||
| JH Maree3 | 2019 | 277 | 1 200 | 3 170 | 4 647 | |
| 2018 | 277 | 1 255 | 3 170 | 4 702 | ||
| NNA Matyumza | 2019 | 277 | 823 | 277 | 1 377 | |
| 2018 | 277 | 718 | 277 | 1 272 | ||
| Adv KD Moroka | 2019 | 277 | 857 | 277 | 1 411 | |
| 2018 | 277 | 857 | 277 | 1 411 | ||
| Dr ML Oduor-Otieno | 2019 | 963 | 450 | 963 | 2 376 | |
| 2018 | 919 | 492 | 919 | 2 330 | ||
| AC Parker | 2019 | 277 | 698 | 277 | 1 252 | |
| 2018 | 277 | 670 | 277 | 1 224 | ||
| ANA Peterside CON | 2019 | 963 | 676 | 963 | 2 602 | |
| 2018 | 919 | 676 | 919 | 2 514 | ||
| MJD Ruck4 | 2019 | 277 | 1 441 | 1 472 | 3 190 | |
| 2018 | 277 | 1 886 | 1 733 | 3 896 | ||
| PD Sullivan | 2019 | 963 | 1 436 | 963 | 3 362 | |
| 2018 | 919 | 1 492 | 919 | 3 330 | ||
| JM Vice | 2019 | 277 | 1 233 | 277 | 1 787 | |
| 2018 | 277 | 1 233 | 277 | 1 787 | ||
| L Wang | 2019 | 277 | 351 | 277 | 905 | |
| 2018 | 277 | 334 | 277 | 888 | ||
| RMW Dunne5 | 2019 | |||||
| 2018 | 110 | 535 | 110 | 755 | ||
| Total | 2019 | 13 424 | 11 803 | 10 890 | 503 | 36 620 |
| Total | 2018 | 12 901 | 12 682 | 10 628 | 503 | 36 714 |
1 TS Gcabashe other benefits relate to use of motor vehicle.
2 MA Erasmus was appointed to the board on 12 July 2020.
3 JH Maree's fees for services as a director of group subsidiaries include fees paid by Liberty Holdings Limited.
4 MJD Ruck's fees for services as a director of group subsidiaries include fees paid by Industrial and Commercial Bank of China (Argentina) S.A.
5 RMW Dunne retired on 24 May 2018.
Fees are excluding VAT.
The EGS represents participation rights in the future growth of Standard Bank Group's share price. The eventual value of the right is settled by the receipt of Standard Bank Group shares equivalent to the full value of the participation rights. Certain EGS awards issued prior to March 2014 included performance conditions.
Employees are awarded a deferred bonus, as a mandatory deferral of their short-term incentive or as discretionary award, into the Deferred Bonus Scheme. The deferred bonus is unitised into a number of units with respect to the group's share price on the date of award. The shares are delivered to the employee on the vesting date for equity-settled share incentives. The cash-settled Deferred Bonus Scheme awards are settled in cash on the vesting date. Notional dividends on the units are paid to the employees on the vesting date.
The group's PRP, effective from March 2014, is an equity-settled share scheme with a three-year vesting period and is designed to incentivise the group's senior executives whose roles enable them to contribute to and influence the group's long-term decision-making and performance results. The PRP seeks to promote the achievement of the group's strategic long-term objectives and to align the interests of those executives with overall group performance in both earnings growth and ROE. These are the most important financial metrics to create shareholder value and, therefore aligns the interests of management and shareholders. The awards are subject to the achievement of performance conditions set at award date and that determine the number of shares that ultimately vest. The awards will only vest in future in terms of the rules of the PRP. The shares, subject to meeting the pre-specified conditions, are delivered to the employee on vesting date. Notional dividends accrue during the vesting period and will be payable on vesting date.
Selected employees are awarded an incentive award into the Wealth and investment medium-term Investment scheme. The incentive awards are unitised into a number of units with respect to the selected Melville Douglas funds. The incentive awards are settled in cash or units at the election of the employee.
| Performance year | Issue date | Award price | Value at grant date (R'000) |
Vesting date/vesting category |
Expiry date/final vesting date |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Deferred bonus schemes | |||||
| 2015 | 2016/03/03 | 122.24 | 3 950 | 2019/09/30 | |
| 2016 | 2017/03/02 | 155.95 | 1 667 | 2019/09/30 | |
| 2016 | 2017/03/02 | 155.95 | 1 667 | 2020/09/30 | |
| 2016* | 2017/03/02 | 155.95 | 2 597 | 2019/09/30 | |
| 2016* | 2017/03/02 | 155.95 | 2 597 | 2020/09/30 | |
| 2017 | 2018/03/08 | 220.97 | 1 667 | 2019/09/30 | |
| 2017 | 2018/03/08 | 220.97 | 1 667 | 2020/09/30 | |
| 2017 | 2018/03/08 | 220.97 | 1 667 | 2021/09/30 | |
| 2017* | 2018/03/08 | 220.97 | 3 017 | 2019/09/30 | |
| 2017* | 2018/03/08 | 220.97 | 3 017 | 2020/09/30 | |
| 2017* | 2018/03/08 | 220.97 | 3 017 | 2021/09/30 | |
| 2018 | 2019/03/07 | 182.43 | 1 666 | 2020/09/30 | |
| 2018 | 2019/03/07 | 182.43 | 1 666 | 2021/09/30 | |
| 2018 | 2019/03/07 | 182.43 | 1 667 | 2022/09/30 | |
| 2018* | 2019/03/07 | 182.43 | 3 017 | 2020/09/30 | |
| 2018* | 2019/03/07 | 182.43 | 3 017 | 2021/09/30 | |
| 2018* | 2019/03/07 | 182.43 | 3 017 | 2022/09/30 | |
| Performance Reward Plan | |||||
| 2015 | 2016/03/03 | 122.24 | 12 500 | 2019/03/31 | |
| 2016 | 2017/03/02 | 155.95 | 12 500 | 2020/03/31 | |
| 2017 | 2018/03/08 | 220.97 | 14 009 | 2021/03/31 | |
| 2018 | 2019/03/07 | 182.43 | 14 011 | 2022/03/31 | |
| Totals for 2019 | 93 600 |
Exercise date share price
Balance of awards 31 December 2019
Awards made during the year
Number of awards exercised during the year
Number of awards forfeited during the year Value on settlement Fair value at year end
Notional dividend (R'000)5
Refer to footnotes on page 184.
| Units | Value on settlement | Fair value at year end | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Opening balance |
Awards made during the year |
Number of awards exercised during the year |
Number of awards forfeited during the year |
Balance of awards 31 December 2019 |
Exercise date share price |
Award (R'000)2 |
Notional dividend (R'000)3 |
Award (R'000)4 |
Notional dividend (R'000)5 |
| 32 315 10 687 |
32 315 10 687 |
178 178 |
5 746 1 900 |
1 126 296 |
|||||
| 10 688 | 10 688 | 1 799 | 296 | ||||||
| 16 650 | 16 650 | 178 | 2 960 | 462 | |||||
| 16 652 | 16 652 | 2 803 | 462 | ||||||
| 7 542 | 7 542 | 178 | 1 341 | 146 | |||||
| 7 542 | 7 542 | 1 269 | 146 | ||||||
| 7 544 | 7 544 | 1 270 | 146 | ||||||
| 13 652 | 13 652 | 178 | 2 427 | 264 | |||||
| 13 652 13 652 |
13 652 13 652 |
2 298 2 298 |
264 264 |
||||||
| 9 135 | 9 135 | 1 538 | 91 | ||||||
| 9 135 | 9 135 | 1 538 | 91 | ||||||
| 9 138 16 536 |
9 138 16 536 |
1 538 2 783 |
91 164 |
||||||
| 16 536 | 16 536 | 2 783 | 164 | ||||||
| 16 537 | 16 537 | 2 784 | 164 | ||||||
| 113 128 | 113 128 | 185 | 20 955 | 2 818 | |||||
| 80 200 | 80 200 | 13 499 | 2 225 | ||||||
| 63 400 | 63 400 | 10 671 | 1 226 | ||||||
| 76 800 | 76 800 | 12 927 | 763 | ||||||
| 35 329 | 5 112 | 61 798 | 6 557 |
Refer to footnotes on page 184.
| Value at grant date |
Vesting date/vesting |
Expiry date/final |
|||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Performance year | Issue date | Award price | (R'000) | category | vesting date |
| Deferred bonus schemes | |||||
| 2015 | 2016/03/03 | 122.24 | 2 073 | 2019/09/30 | |
| 2016 | 2017/03/02 | 155.95 | 1 000 | 2019/09/30 | |
| 2016 | 2017/03/02 | 155.95 | 1 000 | 2020/09/30 | |
| 2016* | 2017/03/02 | 155.95 | 1 700 | 2019/09/30 | |
| 2016* | 2017/03/02 | 155.95 | 1 700 | 2020/09/30 | |
| 2017 | 2018/03/08 | 220.97 | 1 000 | 2019/09/30 | |
| 2017 | 2018/03/08 | 220.97 | 1 000 | 2020/09/30 | |
| 2017 | 2018/03/08 | 220.97 | 1 000 | 2021/09/30 | |
| 2017* | 2018/03/08 | 220.97 | 1 908 | 2019/09/30 | |
| 2017* | 2018/03/08 | 220.97 | 1 908 | 2020/09/30 | |
| 2017* | 2018/03/08 | 220.97 | 1 909 | 2021/09/30 | |
| 2018 | 2019/03/07 | 182.43 | 1 000 | 2020/09/30 | |
| 2018 | 2019/03/07 | 182.43 | 1 000 | 2021/09/30 | |
| 2018 | 2019/03/07 | 182.43 | 1 000 | 2022/09/30 | |
| 2018* | 2019/03/07 | 182.43 | 1 908 | 2020/09/30 | |
| 2018* | 2019/03/07 | 182.43 | 1 908 | 2021/09/30 | |
| 2018* | 2019/03/07 | 182.43 | 1 909 | 2022/09/30 | |
| Performance Reward Plan | |||||
| 2015 | 2016/03/03 | 122.24 | 7 004 | 2019/03/31 | |
| 2016 | 2017/03/02 | 155.95 | 7 002 | 2020/03/31 | |
| 2017 | 2018/03/08 | 220.97 | 10 010 | 2021/03/31 | |
| 2018 | 2019/03/07 | 182.43 | 12 004 | 2022/03/31 | |
| Equity Growth Scheme vested | |||||
| 2009 | 2010/03/05 | 111.94 | A | 2020/03/05 | |
| 2009 | 2010/03/05 | 111.94 | B | 2020/03/05 | |
| 2010 | 2011/03/04 | 98.80 | A | 2021/03/04 | |
| 2010 | 2011/03/04 | 98.80 | B | 2021/03/04 | |
| 2010 2013 |
2011/03/04 2014/03/06 |
98.80 126.87 |
B D |
2021/03/04 2024/03/06 |
|
| 2013 | 2014/03/06 | 126.87 | D | 2024/03/06 | |
| Totals for 2019 | 60 943 | ||||
Exercise date share price
Balance of awards 31 December 2019
Awards made during the year
Number of awards exercised during the year
Number of awards forfeited during the year Value on settlement Fair value at year end
Notional dividend (R'000)5
Refer to footnotes on page 184.
| Units | Value on settlement | Fair value at year end | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Number of awards exercised during the year |
Awards made during the year |
Number of awards forfeited during the year |
Balance of awards 31 December 2019 |
Exercise date share price |
Award (R'000)2 |
Notional dividend (R'000)3 |
Award (R'000)4 |
Notional dividend (R'000)5 |
|
| 16 956 6 412 |
178 178 |
3 015 1 140 |
591 178 |
||||||
| 10 901 | 6 413 10 901 |
178 | 1 938 | 302 | 1 079 1 835 |
178 302 |
|||
| 4 525 | 4 525 4 527 |
178 | 805 | 88 | 762 762 |
88 88 |
|||
| 8 636 | 8 636 8 637 |
178 | 1 535 | 167 | 1 454 1 454 |
167 167 |
|||
| 5 481 5 481 |
5 481 5 481 |
923 923 |
54 54 |
||||||
| 5 483 10 460 |
5 483 10 460 |
923 1 761 |
55 104 |
||||||
| 10 460 10 462 |
10 460 10 462 |
1 761 1 761 |
104 104 |
||||||
| 63 365 | 44 900 45 300 |
185 | 11 737 | 1 578 | 7 558 7 625 |
1 246 876 |
|||
| 65 800 | 65 800 | 11 075 | 654 | ||||||
| 12 500 12 500 12 500 9 375 3 125 |
|||||||||
| 45 832 22 918 |
20 170 | 2 904 | 41 656 | 4 241 |
Refer to footnotes on page 184.
| Performance year | Issue date | Award price | Value at grant date (R'000) |
Vesting date/vesting category |
Expiry date/final vesting date |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Deferred bonus schemes | |||||
| 2015 | 2016/03/03 | 122.24 | 2 450 | 2019/09/30 | |
| 2016 | 2017/03/02 | 155.95 | 833 | 2019/09/30 | |
| 2016 | 2017/03/02 | 155.95 | 834 | 2020/09/30 | |
| 2016* | 2017/03/02 | 155.95 | 2 033 | 2019/09/30 | |
| 2016* | 2017/03/02 | 155.95 | 2 034 | 2020/09/30 | |
| 2017 | 2018/03/08 | 220.97 | 1 333 | 2019/09/30 | |
| 2017 | 2018/03/08 | 220.97 | 1 333 | 2020/09/30 | |
| 2017 | 2018/03/08 | 220.97 | 1 334 | 2021/09/30 | |
| 2017* | 2018/03/08 | 220.97 | 2 283 | 2019/09/30 | |
| 2017* | 2018/03/08 | 220.97 | 2 283 | 2020/09/30 | |
| 2017* | 2018/03/08 | 220.97 | 2 284 | 2021/09/30 | |
| 2018 | 2019/03/07 | 182.43 | 1 333 | 2020/09/30 | |
| 2018 | 2019/03/07 | 182.43 | 1 333 | 2021/09/30 | |
| 2018 | 2019/03/07 | 182.43 | 1 334 | 2022/09/30 | |
| 2018* | 2019/03/07 | 182.43 | 2 117 | 2020/09/30 | |
| 2018* | 2019/03/07 | 182.43 | 2 117 | 2021/09/30 | |
| 2018* | 2019/03/07 | 182.43 | 2 117 | 2022/09/30 | |
| Performance Reward Plan | |||||
| 2015 | 2016/03/03 | 122.24 | 6 002 | 2019/03/31 | |
| 2016 | 2017/03/02 | 155.95 | 6 004 | 2020/03/31 | |
| 2017 | 2018/03/08 | 220.97 | 10 010 | 2021/03/31 | |
| 2018 | 2019/03/07 | 182.43 | 12 004 | 2022/03/31 | |
| Equity Growth Scheme vested | |||||
| 2009 | 2010/03/05 | 111.94 | A | 2020/03/05 | |
| 2009 | 2010/03/05 | 111.94 | B | 2020/03/05 | |
| 2010 | 2011/03/04 | 98.80 | A | 2021/03/04 | |
| 2010 | 2011/03/04 | 98.80 | B | 2021/03/04 | |
| 2010 | 2011/03/04 | 98.80 | B | 2021/03/04 | |
| Totals for 2019 | 63 405 |
Exercise date share price
Balance of awards 31 December 2019
Awards made during the year
Number of awards exercised during the year
Number of awards forfeited during the year Value on settlement Fair value at year end
Notional dividend (R'000)5
Refer to footnotes on page 184.
| Units | Value on settlement | Fair value at year end | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Opening balance |
Awards made during the year |
Number of awards exercised during the year |
Number of awards forfeited during the year |
Balance of awards 31 December 2019 |
Exercise date share price |
Award (R'000)2 |
Notional dividend (R'000)3 |
Award (R'000)4 |
Notional dividend (R'000)5 |
| 20 044 | 20 044 | 178 | 3 564 | 699 | |||||
| 5 343 | 5 343 | 178 | 950 | 148 | |||||
| 5 345 | 5 345 | 900 | 148 | ||||||
| 13 038 | 13 038 | 178 | 2 318 | 362 | |||||
| 13 040 | 13 040 | 2 195 | 362 | ||||||
| 6 034 | 6 034 | 178 | 1 073 | 117 | |||||
| 6 034 | 6 034 | 1 016 | 117 | ||||||
| 6 035 10 333 |
10 333 | 6 035 | 178 | 1 837 | 200 | 1 016 | 117 | ||
| 10 333 | 10 333 | 1 739 | 200 | ||||||
| 10 334 | 10 334 | 1 739 | 200 | ||||||
| 7 308 | 7 308 | 1 230 | 73 | ||||||
| 7 308 | 7 308 | 1 230 | 73 | ||||||
| 7 311 | 7 311 | 1 231 | 73 | ||||||
| 11 602 | 11 602 | 1 953 | 115 | ||||||
| 11 602 | 11 602 | 1 953 | 115 | ||||||
| 11 604 | 11 604 | 1 953 | 115 | ||||||
| 54 297 | 54 297 | 185 | 10 057 | 1 353 | |||||
| 38 500 | 38 500 | 6 480 | 1 068 | ||||||
| 45 300 | 45 300 | 7 625 | 876 | ||||||
| 65 800 | 65 800 | 11 075 | 654 | ||||||
| 12 500 | 12 500 | ||||||||
| 12 500 | 12 500 | ||||||||
| 13 750 | 13 750 | ||||||||
| 10 312 | 10 312 | ||||||||
| 3 438 | 3 438 | ||||||||
| 19 799 | 2 879 | 43 335 | 4 306 |
Refer to footnotes on page 184.
| Deferred bonus schemes 2016/03/03 122.24 1 267 2019/09/30 10 363 2017/03/02 155.95 1 000 2019/09/30 6 412 2017/03/02 155.95 1 000 2020/09/30 6 413 2017/03/02 155.95 1 283 2019/09/30 8 229 2017/03/02 155.95 1 283 2020/09/30 8 230 2018/03/08 220.97 1 000 2019/09/30 4 525 2018/03/08 220.97 1 000 2020/09/30 4 525 2018/03/08 220.97 1 000 2021/09/30 4 527 2018/03/08 220.97 1 450 2019/09/30 6 562 2018/03/08 220.97 1 450 2020/09/30 6 562 2018/03/08 220.97 1 450 2021/09/30 6 562 2019/03/07 182.43 1 000 2020/09/30 2019/03/07 182.43 1 000 2021/09/30 2019/03/07 182.43 1 000 2022/09/30 2019/03/07 182.43 1 637 2020/09/30 2019/03/07 182.43 1 637 2021/09/30 2019/03/07 182.43 1 638 2022/09/30 2016/03/03 122.24 3 496 2019/03/31 31 628 2017/03/02 155.95 9 996 2020/03/31 64 100 2018/03/08 220.97 10 010 2021/03/31 45 300 2019/03/07 182.43 10 015 2022/03/31 54 612 |
Performance year | Issue date | Award price | Value at grant date (R'000) |
Vesting date/vesting category |
Expiry date/final vesting date |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2015 | ||||||
| 2016 | ||||||
| 2016 | ||||||
| 2016* | ||||||
| 2016* | ||||||
| 5 481 5 481 5 483 8 976 8 976 8 977 54 900 |
2017 | |||||
| 2017 | ||||||
| 2017 | ||||||
| 20177 | ||||||
| 2017* | ||||||
| 2017* | ||||||
| 2018 | ||||||
| 2018 | ||||||
| 2018 | ||||||
| 2018* | ||||||
| 2018* | ||||||
| 2018* | ||||||
| Performance Reward Plan | ||||||
| 2015 | ||||||
| 2016 | ||||||
| 2017 | ||||||
| 2018 | ||||||
| Totals for 2019 |
Exercise date share price
Balance of awards 31 December 2019
Awards made during the year
Number of awards exercised during the year
Number of awards forfeited during the year Value on settlement Fair value at year end
Notional dividend (R'000)5
Refer to footnotes on page 184.
| Units | Value on settlement | Fair value at year end | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Opening balance |
Awards made during the year |
Number of awards exercised during the year |
Number of awards forfeited during the year |
Balance of awards 31 December 2019 |
Exercise date share price |
Award (R'000)2 |
Notional dividend (R'000)3 |
Award (R'000)4 |
Notional dividend (R'000)5 |
| 10 363 | 10 363 | 178 | 1 843 | 361 | |||||
| 6 412 | 6 412 | 178 | 1 140 | 178 | |||||
| 6 413 | 6 413 | 1 079 | 178 | ||||||
| 8 229 | 8 229 | 178 | 1 463 | 228 | |||||
| 8 230 | 8 230 | 1 385 | 228 | ||||||
| 4 525 | 4 525 | 178 | 805 | 88 | |||||
| 4 525 4 527 |
4 525 4 527 |
762 762 |
88 88 |
||||||
| 6 562 | 6 562 | 178 | 1 167 | 127 | |||||
| 6 562 | 6 562 | 1 105 | 127 | ||||||
| 6 562 | 6 562 | 1 105 | 127 | ||||||
| 5 481 | 5 481 | 923 | 54 | ||||||
| 5 481 | 5 481 | 923 | 54 | ||||||
| 5 483 | 5 483 | 923 | 55 | ||||||
| 8 976 | 8 976 | 1 511 | 89 | ||||||
| 8 976 | 8 976 | 1 511 | 89 | ||||||
| 8 977 | 8 977 | 1 511 | 89 | ||||||
| 31 628 | 31 628 | 185 | 5 858 | 788 | |||||
| 64 100 45 300 |
64 100 45 300 |
10 789 7 625 |
1 778 876 |
||||||
| 54 900 | 54 900 | 9 241 | 546 | ||||||
| 12 276 | 1 770 | 41 155 | 4 466 |
Refer to footnotes on page 184.
| Performance year | Issue date | Award price | Value at grant date (R'000) |
Vesting date/vesting category |
Expiry date/final vesting date |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Deferred bonus schemes | |||||
| 2015 | 2016/03/03 | 122.24 | 2 650 | 2019/09/30 | |
| 2016 | 2017/03/02 | 155.95 | 1 250 | 2019/09/30 | |
| 2016 | 2017/03/02 | 155.95 | 1 250 | 2020/09/30 | |
| 2016* | 2017/03/02 | 155.95 | 1 617 | 2019/09/30 | |
| 2016* | 2017/03/02 | 155.95 | 1 617 | 2020/09/30 | |
| 2017 | 2018/03/08 | 220.97 | 1 333 | 2019/09/30 | |
| 2017 | 2018/03/08 | 220.97 | 1 333 | 2020/09/30 | |
| 2017 | 2018/03/08 | 220.97 | 1 334 | 2021/09/30 | |
| 2017* | 2018/03/08 | 220.97 | 1 617 | 2019/09/30 | |
| 2017* | 2018/03/08 | 220.97 | 1 617 | 2020/09/30 | |
| 2017* | 2018/03/08 | 220.97 | 1 617 | 2021/09/30 | |
| 2018 | 2019/03/07 | 182.43 | 1 333 | 2020/09/30 | |
| 2018 | 2019/03/07 | 182.43 | 1 333 | 2021/09/30 | |
| 2018 | 2019/03/07 | 182.43 | 1 334 | 2022/09/30 | |
| 2018* | 2019/03/07 | 182.43 | 1 267 | 2020/09/30 | |
| 2018* | 2019/03/07 | 182.43 | 1 267 | 2021/09/30 | |
| 2018* | 2019/03/07 | 182.43 | 1 267 | 2022/09/30 | |
| Performance Reward Plan | |||||
| 2015 | 2016/03/03 | 122.24 | 6 002 | 2019/03/31 | |
| 2016 | 2017/03/02 | 155.95 | 6 503 | 2020/03/31 | |
| 2017 | 2018/03/08 | 220.97 | 10 010 | 2021/03/31 | |
| 2018 | 2019/03/07 | 182.43 | 10 015 | 2022/03/31 | |
| Share Appreciation Rights Plan | |||||
| 2018 | 2019/03/07 | 182.43 | 2021/03/07 | ||
| 2018 | 2019/03/07 | 182.43 | 2022/03/07 | ||
| 2018 | 2019/03/07 | 182.43 | 2023/03/07 | ||
| Equity Growth Scheme | |||||
| vested | |||||
| 2013 | 2014/03/06 | 126.87 | D | ||
| 2013 | 2014/03/06 | 126.87 | D | ||
| 2013 | 2014/03/06 | 126.87 | D | ||
| 2014 | 2015/03/05 | 156.96 | D | ||
| 2014 | 2015/03/05 | 156.96 | D | ||
| 20148 | 2015/03/05 | 156.96 | D | ||
| Totals for 2019 | 57 566 |
Exercise date share price
Balance of awards 31 December 2019
Awards made during the year
Number of awards exercised during the year
Number of awards forfeited during the year Value on settlement Fair value at year end
Notional dividend (R'000)5
Refer to footnotes on page 184.
| Units | Value on settlement | Fair value at year end | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Opening balance |
Awards made during the year |
Number of awards exercised during the year |
Number of awards forfeited during the year |
Balance of awards 31 December 2019 |
Exercise date share price |
Award (R'000)2 |
Notional dividend (R'000)3 |
Award (R'000)4 |
Notional dividend (R'000)5 |
| 21 680 8 015 8 017 10 366 10 368 6 034 6 034 6 035 |
21 680 8 015 10 366 6 034 |
8 017 10 368 6 034 6 035 |
178 178 178 178 |
3 855 1 425 1 843 1 073 |
756 222 288 117 |
1 349 1 745 1 016 1 016 |
222 288 117 117 |
||
| 7 316 7 316 7 317 |
7 316 | 7 316 7 317 |
178 | 1 301 | 141 | 1 231 1 232 |
141 142 |
||
| 7 308 7 308 7 311 6 943 6 943 6 944 |
7 308 7 308 7 311 6 943 6 943 6 944 |
1 230 1 230 1 231 1 169 1 169 1 169 |
73 73 73 69 69 69 |
||||||
| 54 297 41 700 45 300 |
54 297 | 41 700 45 300 |
185 | 10 057 | 1 353 | 7 019 7 625 |
1 157 876 |
||
| 54 900 | 54 900 | 9 241 | 546 | ||||||
| 29 823 29 823 29 824 |
29 823 29 823 29 824 |
||||||||
| 43 696 43 696 43 697 56 725 56 725 56 725 |
43 696 43 696 43 697 56 725 56 725 56 725 |
||||||||
| 19 554 | 2 876 | 38 672 | 4 032 |
Refer to footnotes on page 184.
| Performance year | Issue date | Award price | Value at grant date (R'000) |
Vesting date/vesting category |
Expiry date/final vesting date |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equity Growth Scheme vested |
||||||
| 2009 | 2010/03/05 | 111.94 | A | 2020/03/05 | ||
| 2011 | 2012/03/08 | 108.90 | A | 2022/03/08 | ||
| 2012 | 2013/03/07 | 115.51 | A | 2023/03/07 | ||
| 2014 | 2015/03/05 | 156.96 | D | 2025/03/05 | ||
| 2012 | 2013/03/07 | 115.51 | A | 2023/03/07 | ||
| 2014 | 2015/03/05 | 156.96 | D | 2025/03/05 | ||
| 2014 | 2015/03/05 | 156.96 | D | 2025/03/05 | ||
| Totals for 2019 |
Exercise date share price
Award (R'000)2
Balance of awards 31 December 2019
Awards made during the year
Number of awards exercised during the year
Number of awards forfeited during the year Value on settlement Fair value at year end
Award (R'000)4 Notional dividend (R'000)5
Notional dividend (R'000)3
1 As at 31 December 2019, SK Tshabalala has a right to Nil (2018: 418 814) shares as a beneficiary of Tutuwa Managers' Trust. At 31 December 2019, the debt per share was R0 (2018: R53.49).
2 Value on settlement is calculated by multiplying the vesting share/settlement price by the total units vesting and applying performance conditions (where applicable). Performance conditions applied to the 2016 PRP award that vested in 2019 was 110.58%, against the performance conditions as explained in the remuneration structure section of the group's remuneration report within the governance and remuneration report.
3 Value is calculated by multiplying the notional dividend per unit with the total vesting units and applying performance conditions (where applicable).
4 Value is calculated by multiplying the year end SBK share price of R168.32 by the total outstanding units and applying performance conditions (where applicable). 5 Value is calculated by multiplying the notional dividend (accumulated from grant date to year end) with the total outstanding units and applying performance
conditions (where applicable). 6 As at 31 December 2019, AKL Fihla has a right to Nil (2018: 134 232) shares as a beneficiary of Tutuwa Managers' Trust. At 31 December 2019, the debt per share was R0 (2018: R53.49).
7 This award was settled with equity as opposed to cash in September 2019. This was done in order for the director to meet minimum shareholding requirements.
8 In March 2015, Deferred Bonus Scheme awards were converted into Equity Growth Scheme (EGS) awards (without conditions) and have vested in March 2019.
| Units | Value on settlement | Fair value at year end | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Opening balance |
Awards made during the year |
Number of awards exercised during the year |
Number of awards forfeited during the year |
Balance of awards 31 December 2019 |
Exercise date share price |
Award (R'000)2 |
Notional dividend (R'000)3 |
Award (R'000)4 |
Notional dividend (R'000)5 |
| 500 000 | 500 000 | 165 | 26 605 | ||||||
| 61 471 | 61 471 | ||||||||
| 37 729 | 37 729 | ||||||||
| 26 148 | 26 148 | ||||||||
| 18 865 | 18 865 | ||||||||
| 26 148 | 26 148 | ||||||||
| 26 149 | 26 149 | ||||||||
| 26 605 |
per share was R0 (2018: R53.49).
share was R0 (2018: R53.49).
1 As at 31 December 2019, SK Tshabalala has a right to Nil (2018: 418 814) shares as a beneficiary of Tutuwa Managers' Trust. At 31 December 2019, the debt
4 Value is calculated by multiplying the year end SBK share price of R168.32 by the total outstanding units and applying performance conditions (where applicable). 5 Value is calculated by multiplying the notional dividend (accumulated from grant date to year end) with the total outstanding units and applying performance conditions (where applicable). 6 As at 31 December 2019, AKL Fihla has a right to Nil (2018: 134 232) shares as a beneficiary of Tutuwa Managers' Trust. At 31 December 2019, the debt per
7 This award was settled with equity as opposed to cash in September 2019. This was done in order for the director to meet minimum shareholding requirements. 8 In March 2015, Deferred Bonus Scheme awards were converted into Equity Growth Scheme (EGS) awards (without conditions) and have vested in March 2019.
2 Value on settlement is calculated by multiplying the vesting share/settlement price by the total units vesting and applying performance conditions (where applicable). Performance conditions applied to the 2016 PRP award that vested in 2019 was 110.58%, against the performance conditions as explained
3 Value is calculated by multiplying the notional dividend per unit with the total vesting units and applying performance conditions (where applicable).
in the remuneration structure section of the group's remuneration report within the governance and remuneration report.
The following accounting policies were applied in the preparation of the group and company financial statements, a copy of the full set of accounting policies is available at the company's registered office.

Investments in subsidiaries are accounted for at cost less accumulated impairment losses (where applicable) in the separate financial statements. The carrying amounts of these investments are reviewed annually for impairment indicators and, where an indicator of impairment exists, are impaired to the higher of the investment's fair value less costs to sell or value in use.
The accounting policies of subsidiaries that are consolidated by the group conform to the group's accounting policies. Intragroup transactions, balances and unrealised gains (losses) are eliminated on consolidation. Unrealised losses are eliminated in the same manner as unrealised gains, but only to the extent that there is no evidence of impairment. The proportion of comprehensive income and changes in equity allocated to the group and non-controlling interest are determined on the basis of the group's present ownership interest in the subsidiary.
Subsidiaries are consolidated from the date on which the group acquires control up to the date that control is lost. Control is assessed on a continuous basis. For mutual funds the group further assesses its control by considering the existence of either voting rights or significant economic power.
Common control transactions, in which the company is the ultimate parent entity both before and after the transaction, are accounted for at book value.
The results and financial position of foreign operations that have a functional currency that is different from the group's presentation currency are translated into the group's presentation currency as follows:
Foreign currency transactions are translated into the respective group entities' functional currencies at exchange rates prevailing at the date of the transactions (in certain instances a rate that approximates the actual rate at the date of the transaction is utilised, for example, an average rate for a month). Foreign exchange gains and losses resulting from the settlement of such transaction and from the translation of monetary assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies at year end exchange rates, are recognised in profit or loss (except when recognised in OCI as part of qualifying cash flow hedges and net investment hedges).
Non-monetary assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies that are measured at historical cost are translated using the exchange rate at the transaction date, and those measured at fair value are translated at the exchange rate at the date that the fair value was determined. Exchange rate differences on non-monetary items are accounted for based on the classification of the underlying items.
Foreign exchange gains and losses on equities (debt) classified as fair value through OCI are recognised in the fair value through OCI reserve in OCI (trading revenue) whereas the exchange differences on equities (debt) that are classified as held at fair value through profit or loss are reported as part of the other revenue (trading revenue) in profit or loss.
Foreign currency gains and losses on intragroup loans are recognised in profit or loss except where the settlement of the loan is neither planned nor likely to occur in the foreseeable future. In these cases the foreign currency gains and losses are recognised in the group's FCTR.
The results, cash flows and financial position of group entities which are accounted for as entities operating in hyperinflationary economies and that have functional currencies different from the presentation currency of the group are translated into the presentation currency of its parent at the exchange rate at the reporting date. As the presentation currency of the group and that of the company is that of a non-hyperinflationary economy, comparative amounts are not adjusted for the changes in the index or exchange rates in the current year.
The financial results of the group entities whose functional currencies are the currencies of hyperinflationary economies are adjusted in terms of the measuring unit current at the end of the reporting period following the historic cost approach.
However, as the presentation currency of the group is that of a non-hyperinflationary economy, comparative amounts are not adjusted for changes in the index in the current year. Differences between these comparative amounts and current year hyperinflation adjusted are recognised directly in equity.
The carrying amounts of non-monetary assets and liabilities are adjusted to reflect the change in the general price index from the date of acquisition to the end of the reporting period. On initial application of hyperinflation, prior period gains and losses are recognised directly in equity. Gains or losses on the net monetary position are recognised in profit or loss. All items recognised in the income statement are restated by applying the change in the general price index from the dates when the items of income and expenses were initially earned or incurred.
At the beginning of the first period of application, the components of equity, except retained earnings, are restated by applying a general price index from the dates the components were contributed or otherwise arose. These restatements are recognised directly in equity as an adjustment to opening retained earnings. Restated retained earnings are derived from all other amounts in the restated statement of financial position. At the end of the first period and in subsequent periods, all components of equity are restated by applying a general price index from the beginning of the period or the date of contribution, if later. All items in the statement of cash flows are expressed in terms of the general price index at the end of the reporting period.
The South Sudan and Zimbabwe economies have been classified as hyperinflationary. Accordingly, the results, cash flows and financial position of these group subsidiaries have been expressed in terms of the measuring unit current at the reporting date. For further details, refer to Annexure A.

Associates and joint ventures are initially measured at cost and subsequently accounted for using the equity method at an amount that reflects the group's share of the net assets of the associate or joint venture (including goodwill).
Equity accounting is applied from the date on which the entity becomes an associate or joint venture up to the date on which the group ceases to have significant influence or joint control.
Equity accounting of losses is restricted to the interests in these entities, including unsecured receivables or other commitments, unless the group has an obligation or has made payments on behalf of the associate or joint ventures.
Where there is an indicator of impairment the carrying amount of the investment is tested for impairment by comparing its recoverable amount with its carrying amount.
Impairment losses are recognised through non-trading and capital related items. Impairment losses recognised in prior periods are assessed at each reporting date for any indications that the loss has decreased or no longer exists. An impairment loss is reversed if there has been a change in the estimates used to determine the recoverable amount, but only to the extent that the investment's carrying amount does not exceed the carrying amount that would have been determined, net of equity accounted losses, if no impairment loss had been recognised.
For a disposal of an associate or joint venture, being where the group loses significant influence over an associate or loses joint control over a joint venture, the difference between the sales proceeds and any retained interest and the carrying value of the equity accounted investment is recognised as a gain or loss in non-trading and capital related items. Any gains or losses in OCI reserves that relate to the associate or joint venture are reclassified to non-trading and capital related items in profit or loss at the time of the disposal.
The accounting policies of associates and joint ventures have been changed where necessary to ensure consistency with the policies of the group.
Private equity and venture capital investments, including mutual funds held by investment-linked insurance funds that are associates are either designated on initial recognition at fair value through profit or loss, or are equity accounted.
188
modification
All financial instruments are measured initially at fair value plus directly attributable transaction costs and fees, except for those financial instruments that are subsequently measured at fair value through profit or loss where such transaction costs and fees are immediately recognised in profit or loss. Financial instruments are recognised (derecognised) on the date the group commits to purchase (sell) the instruments (trade date accounting).

190
| Amortised cost | A debt instrument that meets both of the following conditions (other than those designated at fair value through profit or loss): • Held within a business model whose objective is to hold the debt instrument (financial asset) in order to collect contractual cash flows; and • The contractual terms of the financial asset give rise on specified dates to cash flows that are solely payments of principal and interest on the principal amount outstanding. This assessment includes determining the objective of holding the asset and whether the contractual cash flows are consistent with a basic lending arrangement. Where the contractual terms introduce exposure to risk or volatility that are not considered de minimis and are inconsistent with a basic lending arrangement, the financial asset is classified as fair value through profit or loss – default. |
|---|---|
| Fair value through OCI | Includes: • A debt instrument that meets both of the following conditions (other than those designated at fair value through profit or loss): – Held within a business model in which the debt instrument (financial asset) is managed to both collect contractual cash flows and sell financial assets; and – The contractual terms of the financial asset give rise on specified dates to cash flows that are solely payments of principal and interest on the principal amount outstanding. • This assessment includes determining the objective of holding the asset and whether the contractual cash flows are consistent with a basic lending arrangement. Where the contractual terms introduce exposure to risk or volatility that are not considered de minimis and are inconsistent with a basic lending arrangement, the financial asset is classified as fair value through profit or loss – default. • Equity financial assets which are not held-for-trading and are irrevocably elected (on an instrument-by-instrument basis) to be presented at fair value through OCI. |
| Held-for-trading | Those financial assets acquired principally for the purpose of selling in the near term (including all derivative financial assets) and those that form part of a portfolio of identified financial instruments that are managed together and for which there is evidence of a recent actual pattern of short-term profit taking. Included are commodities that are acquired principally for the purpose of selling in the near future or generating a profit from fluctuations in price or broker-trader margin. |
| Designated at fair value through profit or loss |
Financial assets are designated to be measured at fair value through profit or loss to eliminate or significantly reduce an accounting mismatch that would otherwise arise. |
| Fair value through profit or loss – default |
Financial assets that are not classified into one of the above mentioned financial asset categories. |
Subsequent to initial measurement, financial assets are classified in their respective categories and measured at either amortised cost or fair value as follows:
| Amortised cost | Amortised cost using the effective interest method with interest recognised in interest income, less any expected credit impairment losses which are recognised as part of credit impairment charges. |
|---|---|
| Directly attributable transaction costs and fees received are capitalised and amortised through interest income as part of the effective interest rate. |
|
| Fair value through OCI | Debt instrument: Fair value, with gains and losses recognised directly in the fair value through OCI reserve. When a debt financial asset is disposed of, the cumulative fair value adjustments, previously recognised in OCI, are reclassified to the other gains and losses on financial instruments within non-interest revenue. Expected credit impairment losses are recognised as part of credit impairment charges. However, for these FVOCI debt instruments the expected credit loss is recognised in OCI and does not reduce the carrying amount of the financial asset in the statement of financial position. Interest income on a debt financial asset is recognised in interest income in terms of the effective interest rate method. |
| Dividends received are recognised in interest income within profit or loss. | |
| Equity instrument: Fair value, with gains and losses recognised directly in the fair value through OCI reserve. When equity financial assets are disposed of, the cumulative fair value adjustments in OCI are reclassified within reserves to retained income. |
|
| Dividends received on equity instruments are recognised in other revenue within non interest revenue. |
|
| Held for trading | Fair value, with gains and losses arising from changes in fair value (including interest and dividends) recognised in trading revenue. |
| Designated at fair value through profit or loss |
Fair value gains and losses (including interest and dividends) on the financial asset are recognised in the income statement as part of other gains and losses on financial instruments within non-interest revenue. |
| Fair value through profit or loss – default |
Debt instruments: Fair value gains and losses (including interest and dividends) on the financial asset recognised in the income statement as part of other gains and losses on financial instruments within non-interest revenue. Equity instruments: Fair value gains and losses on the financial asset recognised in the income statement as part of other gains and losses on financial instruments. Dividends received on equity instruments are recognised in other revenue within non interest revenue. |
ECL is recognised on debt financial assets classified as either amortised cost or fair value through OCI, financial guarantee contracts that are not designated at fair value through profit or loss, as well as loan commitments that are neither measured at fair value through profit or loss nor are used to provide a loan at a below market interest rate.
The measurement basis of the ECL of a financial asset includes assessing whether there has been a SICR at the reporting date which includes forward-looking information that is available without undue cost or effort at the reporting date about past events, current conditions and forecasts of future economic conditions. The measurement basis of the ECL, which is set out in the table that follows, is measured as the unbiased and probability-weighted amount that is determined by evaluating a range of possible outcomes, the time value of money and forward-looking information.
| Stage 1 | A 12-month ECL is calculated for financial assets which are neither credit-impaired on origination nor for which there has been a SICR. |
|---|---|
| Stage 2 | A lifetime ECL allowance is calculated for financial assets that are assessed to have displayed a SICR since origination and are not considered low credit risk. |
| Stage 3 (credit impaired assets) |
A lifetime ECL is calculated for financial assets that are assessed to be credit impaired. The following criteria are used in determining whether the financial asset is impaired: • default • significant financial difficulty of borrower and/or modification • probability of bankruptcy or financial reorganisation • disappearance of an active market due to financial difficulties. |
| Significant increase in credit risk (SICR) |
At each reporting date the group assesses whether the credit risk of its exposures has increased significantly since initial recognition by considering the change in the risk of default occurring over the expected life of the financial asset. Credit risk of exposures which are overdue for more than 30 days are also considered to have increased significantly. |
|---|---|
| Low credit risk | Exposures are generally considered to have a low credit risk where there is a low risk of default, the exposure has a strong capacity to meet its contractual cash flow obligations and adverse changes in economic and business conditions may not necessarily reduce the exposure's ability to fulfil its contractual obligations. |
| Default | The group's definition of default has been aligned to its internal credit risk management definitions and approaches. A financial asset is considered to be in default when there is objective evidence of impairment. The following criteria are used in determining whether there is objective evidence of impairment for financial assets or groups of financial assets: • significant financial difficulty of borrower and/or modification (i.e. known cash flow difficulties experienced by the borrower) • a breach of contract, such as default or delinquency in interest and/or principal payments • disappearance of active market due to financial difficulties • it becomes probable that the borrower will enter bankruptcy or other financial reorganisation • where the group, for economic or legal reasons relating to the borrower's financial difficulty, grants the borrower a concession that the group would not otherwise consider. • Exposures which are overdue for more than 90 days are also considered to be in default. |
| Forward-looking information |
Forward-looking information is incorporated into the group's impairment methodology calculations and in the group's assessment of SICR. The group includes all forward-looking information which is reasonable and available without undue cost or effort. The information will typically include expected macroeconomic conditions and factors that are expected to impact portfolios or individual counterparty exposures. |
| Write-off | Financial assets are written off when there is no reasonable expectation of recovery. Financial assets which are written off may still be subject to enforcement activities. |
| Financial assets measured at amortised cost (including loan commitments) |
Recognised as a deduction from the gross carrying amount of the asset (group of assets). Where the impairment allowance exceeds the gross carrying amount of the asset (group of assets), the excess is recognised as a provision within other liabilities. |
|---|---|
| Off-balance sheet exposures (excluding loan commitments) |
Recognised as a provision within other liabilities. |
| Financial assets measured at fair value through OCI |
Recognised in the fair value reserve within equity. The carrying value of the financial asset is recognised in the statement of financial position at fair value. |
| Held-for-trading | Those financial liabilities incurred principally for the purpose of repurchasing in the near term (including all derivative financial liabilities) and those that form part of a portfolio of identified financial instruments that are managed together and for which there is evidence of a recent actual pattern of short-term profit taking. |
|---|---|
| Designated at fair value through profit or loss |
Financial liabilities are designated to be measured at fair value in the following instances: • To eliminate or significantly reduce an accounting mismatch that would otherwise arise where the financial liabilities are managed and their performance evaluated and reported on a fair value basis • Where the financial liability contains one or more embedded derivatives that significantly modify the financial liabilty's cash flows. |
| Amortised cost | All other financial liabilities not included in the above categories. |
Subsequent to initial measurement, financial liabilities are classified in their respective categories and measured at either amortised cost or fair value as follows:
| Held-for-trading | Fair value, with gains and losses arising from changes in fair value (including interest and dividends) recognised in trading revenue. |
|---|---|
| Designated at fair value through profit or loss |
Fair value, with gains and losses arising from changes in fair value (including interest and dividends but excluding fair value gains and losses attributable to own credit risk) are recognised in the other gains and losses on financial instruments as part of non-interest revenue. Fair value gains and losses attributable to changes in own credit risk are recognised within OCI. |
| Amortised cost | Amortised cost using the effective interest method recognised in interest expense. |
Derecognition and modification of financial assets and liabilities
Financial assets and liabilities are derecognised in the following instances:
| Derecognition | Modification | |
|---|---|---|
| Financial assets | Financial assets are derecognised when the contractual rights to receive cash flows from the financial assets have expired, or where the group has transferred its contractual rights to receive cash flows on the financial asset such that it has transferred substantially all the risks and rewards of ownership of the financial asset. Any interest in the transferred financial assets that is created or retained by the group is recognised as a separate asset or liability. The group enters into transactions whereby it transfers assets recognised in its statement of financial position, but retains either all or a portion of the risks or rewards of the transferred assets. If all or substantially all risks and rewards are retained, then the transferred assets are not derecognised. Transfers of assets with the retention of all or substantially all risks and rewards include securities lending and repurchase agreements. When assets are sold to a third-party with a concurrent total rate of return swap on the transferred assets, the transaction is accounted for as a secured financing transaction, similar to repurchase transactions. In transactions where the group neither retains nor transfers substantially all the risks and rewards of ownership of a financial asset, the asset is derecognised if control over the asset is lost. The rights and obligations retained in the transfer are recognised separately as assets and liabilities as appropriate. In transfers where control over the asset is retained, the group continues to recognise the asset to the extent of its continuing involvement, determined by the extent to which it is exposed to changes in the value of the transferred asset. |
Where an existing financial asset or liability is replaced by another with the same counterparty on substantially different terms, or the terms of an existing financial asset or liability are substantially modified, such an exchange or modification is treated as a derecognition of the original asset or liability and the recognition of a new asset or liability at fair value, including calculating a new effective interest rate, with the difference in the respective carrying amounts being recognised in other gains and losses on financial instruments within non-interest revenue. The date of recognition of a new asset is consequently considered to be the date of initial recognition for impairment calculation purposes. If the terms are not substantially different for financial assets or financial liabilities, the group recalculates the new gross carrying amount by discounting the modified cash flows of the financial asset or financial liability using the original effective interest rate. The difference between the new gross carrying amount and the original gross carrying amount is recognised as a modification gain or loss within credit impairments (for distressed financial asset modifications) or in other gains and losses on financial instruments within non interest revenue (for all other modifications). |
| Financial liabilities | Financial liabilities are derecognised when the financial liabilities' obligation is extinguished, that is, when the obligation is discharged, cancelled or expires. |
A financial guarantee contract is a contract that requires the group (issuer) to make specified payments to reimburse the holder for a loss it incurs because a specified debtor fails to make payment when due in accordance with the original or modified terms of a debt instrument.
Financial guarantee contracts are initially recognised at fair value, which is generally equal to the premium received, and then amortised over the life of the financial guarantee. Financial guarantee contracts (that are not designated at fair value through profit or loss) are subsequently measured at the higher of the:
In the normal course of business, the group enters into a variety of derivative transactions for both trading and hedging purposes. Derivative financial instruments are entered into for trading purposes and for hedging foreign exchange, interest rate, inflation, credit, commodity and equity exposures. Derivative instruments used by the group in both trading and hedging activities include swaps, options, forwards, futures and other similar types of instruments based on foreign exchange rates, credit risk, inflation risk, interest rates and the prices of commodities and equities.
Derivatives are initially recognised at fair value. Derivatives that are not designated in a qualifying hedge accounting relationship are classified as held-for-trading with all changes in fair value being recognised within trading revenue. This includes forward contracts to purchase or sell commodities, where net settlement occurs or where physical delivery occurs and the commodities are held to settle another derivative contract. All derivative instruments are carried as financial assets when the fair value is positive and as financial liabilities when the fair value is negative.
In terms on IFRS 9, embedded derivatives included in hybrid instruments, where the host is a financial asset, is assessed in terms of the accounting policy on financial assets. In all other instances (being non-financial host contracts and financial liabilities), the embedded derivatives are treated and disclosed as separate derivatives when their economic characteristics and risks are not closely related to those of the host contract, the terms of the embedded derivative are the same as those of a stand-alone derivative and the combined contract is not measured at fair value through profit or loss. The host contract is accounted for and measured applying the relevant group accounting policy.
The method of recognising fair value gains and losses on derivatives designated as a hedging instrument depends on the nature of the hedge relationship.
Derivatives are designated by the group into the following relationships:
| Type of hedge | Nature | Treatment |
|---|---|---|
| Fair value hedges | Hedges of the fair value of recognised financial assets, liabilities or firm commitments. |
Where a hedging relationship is designated as a fair value hedge, the hedged item is adjusted for the change in fair value in respect of the risk being hedged. Gains or losses on the remeasurement of both the derivative and the hedged item are recognised in profit or loss. Fair value adjustments relating to the hedging instrument are allocated to the same line item in profit or loss as the related hedged item. Any hedge ineffectiveness is recognised in profit or loss. If the derivative expires, is sold, terminated, exercised, no longer meets the criteria for fair value hedge accounting, or the designation is revoked, then hedge accounting is discontinued. The adjustment to the carrying amount of a hedged item measured at amortised cost, for which the effective interest method is used, is amortised to profit or loss as part of the hedged item's recalculated effective interest rate over the period to maturity. |
| Cash flow hedges | Hedges of highly probable future cash flows attributable to a recognised asset or liability, a forecasted transaction, or a highly probable forecast intragroup transaction. |
The effective portion of changes in the fair value of derivatives that are designated and qualify as cash flow hedges is recognised in the cash flow hedging reserve. The ineffective part of any changes in fair value is recognised in profit or loss. Amounts recognised in OCI are transferred to profit or loss in the periods in which the hedged forecast cash flows affect profit or loss. However, when the forecast transaction that is hedged results in the recognition of a non-financial asset or a non-financial liability, the cumulative gains or losses recognised previously in OCI are transferred and included in the initial measurement of the cost of the asset or liability. If the derivative expires, is sold, terminated, exercised, no longer meets the criteria for cash flow hedge accounting, or the designation is revoked, then hedge accounting is discontinued. The cumulative gains or losses recognised in OCI remain in OCI until the forecast transaction is recognised in the case of a non-financial asset or a non-financial liability, or until the forecast transaction affects profit or loss in the case of a financial asset or a financial liability. If the forecast transaction is no longer expected to occur, the cumulative gains and losses recognised in OCI are immediately reclassified to profit or loss. |
| Net investment hedges |
Hedges of net investments in a foreign operation. |
The designated component of the hedging instrument that relates to the effective portion of the hedge, is recognised directly in the foreign currency hedge of net investment reserve. The ineffective part of any changes in fair value is recognised in profit or loss. The cumulative gains and losses in OCI are accounted for similarly to cash flow hedges. |
Where all relevant criteria are met, derivatives are classified as derivatives held-for-hedging and hedge accounting is applied to remove the accounting mismatch between the derivative (hedging instrument) and the underlying instruments (hedged item). All qualifying hedging relationships are designated as either fair value, cash flow, or net investment hedges for recognised financial assets or liabilities, and highly probable forecast transactions. The group and company apply hedge accounting in respect of the following risk categories.
The group and company operate internationally and are exposed to foreign exchange risk and translation risk.
Foreign exchange risk arises from recognised assets and liabilities and future highly probable forecast commercial transactions denominated in a currency that is not the functional currency of the group and company. The risk is evaluated by measuring and monitoring the net foreign monetary asset value and the forecast highly probable foreign currency income and expenditures of the relevant group entity for each respective currency. Foreign currency risk is hedged with the objective of minimising the earnings volatility associated with assets, liabilities, income and expenditure denominated in a foreign currency.
Translation risk arises on consolidation from recognised assets and liabilities denominated in a currency that is not the reporting currency of the group and company. The risk is evaluated by measuring and monitoring the net foreign nonmonetary asset value of the relevant group entity for each respective currency.
The group and company use a combination of currency forwards, swaps and foreign denominated cash balances to mitigate against the risk of changes in the future cash flows and functional currency value on its foreign-denominated exposures. Under the group's policy, the critical terms of these instruments must align with the foreign currency risk of the hedged item and is hedged on a 1:1 hedge ratio or where currency is managed on a portfolio basis the weighted expected foreign cash flows are aligned.
The group and company elect for each foreign currency hedging relationship, using either foreign currency forwards and swaps, to either include or exclude the currency forward points (basis) contained in the derivative instrument from the hedging relationship. This election is based on the currency pair involved, the shape of the yield-curve and the direction of the foreign currency hedged risk. Basis is determined using the differential between the contracted forward rate and the spot market exchange rate and is discounted, where material. Where the basis is excluded from the hedging relationship this is deferred in other comprehensive income and recognised in profit or loss as appropriate during the hedging relationship.
Hedge effectiveness between the hedging instrument and the hedged item is determined at the inception of the hedge relationship and through periodic effectiveness assessments to ensure that an economic relationship exists. For hedges of foreign currency risk, the group and company enter hedge relationships where the critical terms of the hedging instrument match exactly with the terms of the hedged item. If changes in circumstances affect the terms of the hedged item such that the critical terms no longer match exactly with the critical terms of the hedging instrument, the group and company use the hypothetical derivative method to assess effectiveness. In hedges of foreign currency risk of highly probable forecast commercial transactions, ineffectiveness may arise if the amount of the forecast transaction changes from what was originally estimated. Ineffectiveness relating to highly probable forecast transactions no longer expected to occur during both 2018 and 2019 amounted to Rnil. Refer to note 2.
The group and company operate share incentive schemes that enable key management personnel and senior employees to benefit from the performance of SBG's share price. For further detail regarding the share schemes, refer to annexure D – equity-linked transactions and the group's governance and remuneration report. These share incentive schemes expose the group and company to equity price risk due to volatility in the share price of SBG (SBK:SJ). The group and company have in place appropriate risk management strategies and reporting processes in respect of this risk.
The group and company use a combination of equity forwards and options to mitigate against the risk of changes in the future cash flows associated with certain cash-settled schemes on a post attrition and vesting assumption basis. The following scheme exposures are subject to cash flow hedge accounting at a group level: Deferred Bonus Scheme (DBS) and Cash-Settled Deferred Bonus Scheme (CSDBS). Cash flow hedge accounting is applied to align the timing mismatch of the derivative hedging instruments to the vesting period of the underlying awards (hedged items) over the applicable vesting period.
Under the group's policy the critical terms of these instruments must align with equity price risk of the hedged item and is hedged on a 1:1 hedge ratio. The group and company elect for each hedging relationship, using either equity forwards and/or options, to either include or exclude the forward points (basis) contained in the derivative instrument from the hedging relationship. Basis is determined using the differential between the contracted forward rate and the spot market exchange rate and is discounted, where material. Where the basis is excluded from the hedging relationship this is deferred in other comprehensive income and recognised in profit or loss as appropriate during the hedging relationship.
Hedge effectiveness between the hedging instrument and the hedged item is determined at the inception of the hedge relationship and through periodic effectiveness assessments to ensure that an economic relationship exists. For hedges of equity price risk, the group and company enter hedge relationships where the critical terms of the hedging instrument match exactly with the terms of the hedged item. If changes in circumstances affect the terms of the hedged item such that the critical terms no longer match exactly with the critical terms of the hedging instrument, the group and company use the hypothetical derivative method to assess effectiveness. Refer to note 2.
Banking book-related market risk exposure principally involves managing the potential adverse effect of interest rate movements on banking book earnings (IRRBB) (net interest income and banking book mark-to-market profit or loss) and the economic value of equity. The group and company's approach to managing IRRBB is governed by applicable regulations and is influenced by the competitive environment in which the group and company operate.
The group's treasury and capital management team monitors banking book interest rate risk on a monthly basis operating under the oversight of group ALCO. The group and company's interest rate risk management is predominantly controlled by a central treasury department (group treasury) under approved policies. Group treasury identifies, evaluates and hedges financial risks in close cooperation with the group's operating units. The board provides written principles for overall risk management, as well as policies covering specific areas, such as foreign exchange risk, interest rate risk, credit risk, use of derivative financial instruments and non-derivative financial instruments, and investment of excess liquidity.
In adherence to policies regarding interest rate risk management the group applies fair value hedge accounting in respect of the interest rate risk element only, present within the following exposures:
The group and company observe interest rate risk in respect of these exposures using an unfunded cash collateralised interest rate derivatives discount curve. Hedge effectiveness between the hedging instrument and the hedged item is determined at the inception of the hedge relationship and through periodic effectiveness assessments to ensure that an economic relationship exists using regression analysis between the hedged items and the hedging instruments for sensitivity of changes to changes in interest rate risk only.
The group and company use a combination of interest rate swaps and interest rate basis swaps to mitigate against the risk of changes in market value of hedged items for changes in interest rates. The group elects for each fair value interest rate risk hedging relationship, using swaps, to include forward points (basis) contained in the derivative instrument in the hedging relationship. Where the basis is included in the hedging relationship this exposes the hedge relationship to hedge ineffectiveness. The extent of hedge ineffectiveness as a result of fair value interest rate risk hedges is disclosed in note 2.3.5.
Securities sold subject to linked repurchase agreements (repurchase agreements) are reclassified in the statement of financial position as pledged assets when the transferee has the right by contract or custom to sell or repledge the collateral. The liability to the counterparty is included under deposits and current accounts or trading liabilities, as appropriate.
Securities purchased under agreements to resell (reverse repurchase agreements), at either a fixed price or the purchase price plus a lender's rate of return, are recorded as loans and included under trading assets or loans and advances, as appropriate. For repurchase and reverse repurchase agreements measured at amortised cost, the difference between the purchase and sales price is treated as interest and amortised over the expected life using the effective interest method.
Securities lent to counterparties are retained in the annual financial statements. Securities borrowed are not recognised in the annual financial statements unless sold to third-parties. In these cases, the obligation to return the securities borrowed is recorded at fair value as a trading liability. Income and expenses arising from the securities borrowing and lending business are recognised over the period of the transactions.
Financial assets and liabilities are offset and the net amount reported in the statement of financial position when there is a legally enforceable right to set off the recognised amounts and there is an intention to settle the asset and the liability on a net basis, or to realise the asset and settle the liability simultaneously. The legally enforceable right must not be contingent on future events and must be enforceable in the normal course of business and in the event of default, insolvency or bankruptcy of the counterparties to the transaction.

In terms of IFRS, the group is either required to or elects to measure a number of its financial assets and financial liabilities at fair value. Regardless of the measurement basis, the fair value is required to be disclosed, with some exceptions, for all financial assets and financial liabilities.
Fair value is the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction in the principal (or most advantageous) market between market participants at the measurement date under current market conditions. Fair value is a market-based measurement and uses the assumptions that market participants would use when pricing an asset or liability under current market conditions. When determining fair value it is presumed that the entity is a going concern and is not an amount that represents a forced transaction, involuntary liquidation or a distressed sale. In estimating the fair value of an asset or a liability, the group takes into account the characteristics of the asset or liability that market participants would take into account when pricing the asset or liability at the measurement date.
The group's financial instruments that are both carried at fair value and for which fair value is disclosed are categorised by the level of fair value hierarchy. The different levels are based on the degree to which the inputs to the fair value measurements are observable and the significance of the inputs to the fair value measurement.
The levels have been defined as follows:
Fair value is based on quoted market prices (unadjusted) in active markets for an identical financial asset or liability. An active market is a market in which transactions for the asset or liability take place with sufficient frequency and volume to provide pricing information on an ongoing basis.
Fair value is determined through valuation techniques based on observable inputs, either directly, such as quoted prices, or indirectly, such as those derived from quoted prices. This category includes instruments valued using quoted market prices in active markets for similar instruments, quoted prices for identical or similar instruments in markets that are considered less than active or other valuation techniques where all significant inputs are directly or indirectly observable from market data.
Fair value is determined through valuation techniques using significant unobservable inputs. This category includes all instruments where the valuation technique includes inputs not based on observable data and the unobservable inputs have a significant effect on the instrument's valuation. This category includes instruments that are valued based on quoted prices for similar instruments where significant unobservable adjustments or assumptions are required to reflect differences between the instrument being valued and the similar instrument.
Transfers of financial assets and financial liabilities between levels of the fair value hierarchy are deemed to have occurred at the end of the reporting period.
Fair value is measured based on quoted market prices or dealer price quotations for identical assets and liabilities that are traded in active markets, which can be accessed at the measurement date, and where those quoted prices represent fair value. If the market for an asset or liability is not active or the instrument is not quoted in an active market, the fair value is determined using other applicable valuation techniques that maximise the use of relevant observable inputs and minimise the use of unobservable inputs. These include the use of recent arm's length transactions, discounted cash flow analyses, pricing models and other valuation techniques commonly used by market participants.
Fair value measurements are categorised into level 1, 2 or 3 within the fair value hierarchy based on the degree to which the inputs to the fair value measurements are observable and the significance of the inputs to the fair value measurement.
Where discounted cash flow analyses are used, estimated future cash flows are based on management's best estimates and a market-related discount rate at the reporting date for an asset or liability with similar terms and conditions.
If an asset or a liability measured at fair value has both a bid and an ask price, the price within the bid-ask spread that is most representative of fair value is used to measure fair value.
The group's valuation control framework governs internal control standards, methodologies, and procedures over its valuation processes, which include the following valuation techniques and main inputs and assumptions per type of instrument:
| Item and description | Valuation technique | Main inputs and assumptions |
|---|---|---|
| Derivative financial instruments Derivative financial instruments comprise foreign exchange, interest rate, commodity, credit and equity derivatives that are either held-for trading or designated as hedging instruments in hedge relationships. |
Standard derivative contracts are valued using market accepted models and quoted parameter inputs. More complex derivative contracts are modelled using more sophisticated modelling techniques applicable to the instrument. Techniques include: • discounted cash flow model • Black-Scholes model • combination technique models. |
For level 2 and 3 fair value hierarchy items: • discount rate* • spot prices of the underlying • correlation factors • volatilities • dividend yields • Earnings yield • valuation multiples. |
| Trading assets and trading liabilities Trading assets and liabilities comprise instruments which are part of the group's underlying trading activities. These instruments primarily include sovereign and corporate debt, commodities, collateral, collateralised lending agreements and equity securities. |
Where there are no recent market transactions in the specific instrument, fair value is derived from the last available market price adjusted for changes in risks and information since that date. Where a proxy instrument is quoted in an active market, the fair value is determined by adjusting the proxy |
|
| Pledged assets Pledged assets comprise instruments that may be sold or repledged by the group's counterparty in the absence of default by the group. Pledged assets include sovereign and corporate debt, equities, commodities pledged in terms of repurchase agreements and commodities that have been leased to third-parties. |
fair value for differences between the proxy instrument and the financial investment being fair valued. Where proxies are not available, the fair value is estimated using more complex modelling techniques. These techniques include discounted cash flow and Black-Scholes models using current market rates for credit, interest, liquidity, volatility and other risks. |
|
| Financial investments Financial investments are non-trading financial assets and primarily comprise of sovereign and corporate debt, listed and unlisted equity instruments, investments in debentures issued by the SARB, investments in mutual fund investments and unit-linked investments. |
Combination techniques are used to value unlisted equity securities and include inputs such as earnings and dividend yields of the underlying entity. |
200
| Item and description | Main inputs and assumptions | Valuation technique |
|---|---|---|
| Loans and advances to banks and customers Loans and advances comprise: • Loans and advances to banks: call loans, loans granted under resale agreements and balances held with other banks. • Loans and advances to customers: mortgage loans (home loans and commercial mortgages), other asset-based loans, including collateralised debt obligations (instalment sale and finance leases), and other secured and unsecured loans (card debtors, overdrafts, other demand lending, term lending and loans granted under resale agreements). |
For certain loans fair value may be determined from the market price of a recently occurring transaction adjusted for changes in risks and information between the transaction and valuation dates. Loans and advances are reviewed for observed and verified changes in credit risk and the credit spread is adjusted at subsequent dates if there has been an observable change in credit risk relating to a particular loan or advance. In the absence of an observable market for these instruments, discounted cash flow models are used to determine fair value. Discounted cash flow models incorporate parameter inputs for interest rate risk, foreign exchange risk, liquidity and credit risk, as appropriate. For credit risk, probability of default and loss given default parameters are determined using credit default swaps (CDS) markets, where available and appropriate, as well as the relevant terms of the loan and loan counterparty such as the industry classification and subordination of the loan. |
For level 2 and 3 fair value hierarchy items: • discount rate.* |
| Deposits and debt funding Deposits from banks and customers comprise amounts owed to banks and customers, deposits under repurchase agreements, negotiable certificates of deposit, credit-linked deposits and other deposits. |
For certain deposits, fair value may be determined from the market price on a recently occurring transaction adjusted for all changes in risks and information between the transaction and valuation dates. In the absence of an observable market for these instruments, discounted cash flow models are used to determine fair value based on the contractual cash flows related to the instrument. The fair value measurement incorporates all market risk factors, including a measure of the group's credit risk relevant to that financial liability. The market risk parameters are valued consistently to similar instruments held as assets stated in the section above. The credit risk of the reference asset in the embedded CDS in credit-linked deposits is incorporated into the fair value of all credit-linked deposits that are designated to be measured at fair value through profit or loss. For collateralised deposits that are designated to be measured at fair value through profit or loss, such as securities repurchase agreements, the credit enhancement is incorporated into the fair valuation of the liability. |
For level 2 and 3 fair value hierarchy items: • discount rate.* |
| Item and description | Main inputs and assumptions | Valuation technique |
|---|---|---|
| Policyholders' assets and liabilities Policyholders' assets and liabilities comprise unit-linked policies and annuity certains. |
Unit-linked policies: assets which are linked to the investment contract liabilities are owned by the group. The investment contract obliges the group to use these assets to settle these liabilities. Therefore, the fair value of investment contract liabilities is determined with reference to the fair value of the underlying assets (i.e. amount payable on surrender of the policies). Annuity certains: discounted cash flow models are used to determine the fair value of the stream of future payments. |
For level 2 and 3 fair value hierarchy items: • discount rate*. • spot price of underlying. |
| Third-party financial liabilities arising on the consolidation of mutual funds (included in other liabilities) These are liabilities that arise on the consolidation of mutual funds. |
The fair values of third-party financial liabilities arising on the consolidation of mutual funds are determined using the quoted put (exit) price provided by the fund manager and discounted for the applicable notice period. The fair value of a financial liability with a demand feature is not less than the amount payable on demand, discounted from the first date on which the amount could be required to be paid. |
For level 2 and 3 fair value hierarchy items: • discount rate*. |
* Discount rates, where applicable, include the risk-free rate, risk premiums, liquidity spreads, credit risk (own and counterparty as appropriate), timing of settlement, storage/service costs, prepayment and surrender risk assumptions and recovery rates/loss given default.
The group has elected the portfolio exception to measure the fair value of certain groups of financial assets and financial liabilities. This exception permits the group of financial assets and financial liabilities to be measured at fair value on a net basis, with the net fair value being allocated to the financial assets and financial liabilities.
For financial instruments, where the fair value of the financial instrument differs from the transaction price, the difference is commonly referred to as day one profit or loss. Day one profit or loss is recognised in profit or loss immediately where the fair value of the financial instrument is either evidenced by comparison with other observable current market transactions in the same instrument, or is determined using valuation models with only observable market data as inputs.
Day one profit or loss is deferred where the fair value of the financial instrument is not able to be evidenced by comparison with other observable current market transactions in the same instrument, or is determined using valuation models that utilise non-observable market data as inputs.
The timing of the recognition of deferred day one profit or loss is determined individually depending on the nature of the instrument and availability of market observable inputs. It is either amortised over the life of the transaction, deferred until the instrument's fair value can be determined using market observable inputs, or realised through settlement.

Defined benefit plans
| Type and description | Statement of financial position |
Statement of other comprehensive income |
Income statement |
|---|---|---|---|
| Defined benefit plans The group operates a number of defined benefit retirement and post employment medical aid plans. Employer companies contribute to the cost of benefits taking account of the recommendations of the actuaries. See note 43 for more information. |
Assets or liabilities measured at the present value of the estimated future cash outflows, using interest rates of government bonds denominated in the same currency as the defined benefit plan (corporate bonds are used for currencies for which there is a deep market of high-quality corporate bonds), with maturity dates that approximate the expected maturity of the obligations, less the fair value of plan assets. A net defined benefit asset is only recognised to the extent that economic benefits are available to the group from reductions in future contributions or future refunds from the plan. |
Remeasurements of the net defined benefit obligation, including actuarial gains and losses, the return on plan assets (excluding interest calculated) and the effect of any asset ceiling are recognised within OCI. |
Net interest income/ (expense) is determined on the defined benefit asset/ (liability) by applying the discount rate used to measure the defined benefit obligation at the beginning of the annual period to the net defined benefit asset/ (liability). Other expenses (including current service costs) related to the defined benefit plans are also recognised in operating expenses. When the benefits of a plan are changed or when a plan is curtailed, the resulting change in benefit that relates to past service or the gain or loss on curtailment is recognised immediately in operating expenses. The group recognises gains and losses on the settlement of a defined benefit plan when the settlement occurs. |
| Short-term benefits Short-term benefits consist of salaries, accumulated leave payments, profit share, bonuses and any non-monetary benefits such as medical aid contributions. |
A liability is recognised for the amount expected to be paid under short-term cash bonus plans or accumulated leave if the group has a present legal or constructive obligation to pay this amount as a result of past service provided by the employee and the obligation can be estimated reliably |
No direct impact. | Short-term employee benefit obligations are measured on an undiscounted basis and are expensed in operating expenses as the related service is provided. |
202
carrying amount does not exceed the carrying amount that would have been determined, net of depreciation or amortisation, if no impairment
loss had been recognised.

| Type and initial and subsequent measurement |
Useful lives, depreciation/ amortisation method or fair value basis |
Impairment |
|---|---|---|
| Goodwill Goodwill represents the excess of the consideration transferred and the acquisition date fair value of any previously held equity interest over the group's interest in the net fair value of the identifiable assets, liabilities and contingent liabilities of the acquired subsidiary, associate or joint venture at the date of the acquisition. The group's interest in acquired subsidiaries takes into account any non-controlling interest. Goodwill arising on the acquisition of subsidiaries (associates or joint ventures) is reported in the statement of financial position as part of 'Goodwill and other intangible assets' ('Interest in associates and joint ventures'). |
Not applicable. | The accounting treatment is generally the same as that for tangible assets except as noted below. Goodwill is tested annually for impairment and additionally when an indicator of impairment exists. An impairment loss in respect of goodwill is not reversed. |
| Present value of acquired in force policyholder contracts and investment contracts with discretionary participation features Where a portfolio of policyholder contracts is acquired either directly from another insurer or through the acquisition of a subsidiary, the PVIF business on the portfolio, being the net present value of estimated future cash flows of the existing contracts, is recognised as an intangible asset. The PVIF intangible asset is carried in the statement of financial position at cost less accumulated amortisation and accumulated impairment losses. |
The PVIF intangible asset is amortised on a basis consistent with the settlement of the relevant liability in respect of the purchased contracts (four to 12 years). The estimated life is re-evaluated annually. |
Same accounting treatment as for tangible assets. |
| Type and initial and subsequent measurement |
Useful lives, depreciation/ amortisation method or fair value basis |
Impairment |
|---|---|---|
| Computer software Costs associated with developing or maintaining computer software programmes and the acquisition of software licences are generally recognised as an expense as incurred. However, direct computer software development costs that are clearly associated with an identifiable and unique system, which will be controlled by the group and have a probable future economic benefit beyond one year, are recognised as intangible assets. Intangible assets are carried at cost less accumulated amortisation and accumulated impairment losses from the date that the assets are available for use. Expenditure subsequently incurred on computer software is capitalised only when it increases the future economic benefits embodied in the specific asset to which it relates. |
Amortisation is recognised in operating expenses on a straight line basis at rates appropriate to the expected lives of the assets (two to 15 years) from the date that the asset is available for use. Amortisation methods, useful lives and residual values are reviewed at each financial year end and adjusted, if necessary. |
Intangible assets that have an indefinite useful life are tested annually for impairment and additionally when an indicator of impairment exists. The accounting treatment for computer software and other intangible assets is otherwise the same as for tangible assets. |
| Other intangible assets The group recognises the costs incurred on internally generated intangible assets such as brands, customer lists, customer contracts and similar rights and assets, in operating expenses as incurred. The group capitalises brands, customer lists, customer contracts, distribution forces and similar rights acquired in business combinations. Capitalised intangible assets are measured at cost less accumulated amortisation and accumulated impairment losses. |
Amortisation is recognised in operating expenses on a straight line basis over the estimated useful lives of the intangible assets, not exceeding 20 years, from the date that the asset is available for use. Amortisation methods, useful lives and residual values are reviewed at each financial year end and adjusted, if necessary. |
Non-financial assets are derecognised on disposal or when no future economic benefits are expected from their use or disposal. The gain or loss on derecognition is recognised in profit or loss and is determined as the difference between the net disposal proceeds and the carrying amount of the non-financial asset.
206
| Type and initial and subsequent measurement |
Useful lives, depreciation/ amortisation method or fair value basis |
Impairment |
|---|---|---|
| Investment property Initially measured at cost, including transaction costs. Subsequently measured at fair value and included as part of investment management and service fee income and gains within the profit or loss. |
The fair value is based on valuation information at the reporting date. If the valuation information cannot be reliably determined, the group uses alternative valuation methods such as discounted cash flow projections or recent prices in active markets. Fair value adjustments recognised in investment management and service fee income and gains are adjusted for any double-counting arising from the recognition of lease income on the straight-line basis compared to the accrual basis normally assumed in the fair value determination. |
Investment property is derecognised on disposal or when no future economic benefits are expected from its use or disposal. The gain or loss on derecognition is recognised in investment management and service fee income and gains and is determined as the difference between the net disposal proceeds and the carrying amount of the non-financial asset.
When the use of a property changes such that it is reclassified as property and equipment, its fair value at the date of reclassification becomes its cost for subsequent accounting.
When the use of a property changes such that it is reclassified from property and equipment to investment property, the difference between the carrying value at date of reclassification and its fair value is recognised in OCI.

Property developments are stated at the lower of cost or net realisable value. Cost is assigned by specific identification and includes the cost of acquisition and where applicable, development and borrowing costs during development.
Properties in possession are properties acquired by the group which were previously held as collateral for underlying lending arrangements that, subsequent to origination, have defaulted. The properties are initially recognised at cost and are subsequently measured at the lower of cost and its net realisable value. Any subsequent write-down in the value of the acquired properties is recognised as an operating expense. Any subsequent increases in the net realisable value, to the extent that it does not exceed its original cost, are also recognised within operating expenses.

The fair value of the equity-settled share-based payments are determined on grant date and accounted for within operating expenses (staff costs) over the vesting period with a corresponding increase in the group's share-based payment reserve. Non-market vesting conditions, such as the resignation of employees and retrenchment of staff, are not considered in the valuation but are included in the estimate of the number of options expected to vest. At each reporting date, the estimate of the number of options expected to vest is reassessed and adjusted against operating expenses and sharebased payment reserve over the remaining vesting period.
On vesting of the equity-settled share-based payments, amounts previously credited to the share-based payment reserve are transferred to retained earnings through an equity transfer. On exercise of the equity-settled share-based payment, any proceeds received are credited to share capital and premium.
Cash-settled share-based payments are accounted for as liabilities at fair value until the date of settlement. The liability is recognised over the vesting period and is revalued at every reporting date up to and including the date of settlement. All changes in the fair value of the liability are recognised in operating expenses. The awards vest over the specified period of service and/or once performance conditions are met. The specified period of service is an average 2.5 years and performance conditions include growth in SBG's headline earnings per share and return on equity.

208
| Type and description | Statement of financial position | Income statement | |
|---|---|---|---|
| IFRS 16 – Lessee accounting policies continued | |||
| All leases that meet the criteria as either a lease of a low value asset or a short-term lease are accounted for on a straight-line basis over the lease term. |
Accruals for unpaid lease charges, together with a straight-line lease asset or liability, being the difference between actual payments and the straight-line lease expense are recognised. |
Payments made under these leases, net of any incentives received from the lessor, are recognised in operating expenses on a straight-line basis over the term of the lease. When these leases are terminated before the lease period has expired, any payment required to be made to the lessor by way of a penalty is recognised as operating expenses in the period in which termination takes place. |
|
| Reassessment and modification of leases |
Reassessment of lease terms and lease modifications that are not accounted for as a separate lease: When the group reassesses the terms of any lease (i.e. it reassesses the probability of exercising an extension or termination option) or modifies the terms of a lease without increasing the scope of the lease or where the increased scope is not commensurate with the stand-alone price, it adjusts the carrying amount of the lease liability to reflect the payments to be made over the revised term, which are discounted at the applicable rate at the date of reassessment or modification. The carrying amount of lease liability is similarly revised when the variable element of future lease payments dependent on a rate or index is revised. For reassessments to the lease terms, an equivalent adjustment is made to the carrying amount of the right of use asset, with the revised carrying amount being depreciated over the revised lease term. However, if the carrying amount of the right of use asset is reduced to zero any further reduction in the measurement of the lease liability is recognised in profit or loss. For lease modifications that are not accounted for as a separate lease, an equivalent adjustment is made to the carrying amount of the right of use asset, with the revised carrying amount being depreciated over the revised lease term. However, for lease modifications that decrease the scope of the lease the carrying amount of the right of use asset is decreased to reflect the partial or full termination of the lease, with any resulting difference being recognised in profit or loss as a gain or loss relating to the partial or full termination of the lease. Lease modifications that are accounted for as a separate lease: When the group modifies the terms of a lease resulting in an increase in scope and the consideration for the lease increases by an amount commensurate with a stand-alone price for the increase in scope, the group accounts for these modifications as |
||
| a separate new lease. This accounting treatment equally applies to leases which the group elected the short-term lease exemption and the lease term is subsequently modified. |
|||
| IFRS 16 and IAS 17 – Lessor accounting policies | |||
| Finance leases Leases, where the group transfers substantially all the risk and rewards incidental to ownership, are classified as finance leases. |
Finance lease receivable, including initial direct costs and fees, are primarily accounted for as financing transactions in banking activities, with rentals and instalments receivable, less unearned finance charges, being included in loans and advances. |
Finance charges earned within interest income are computed using the effective interest method, which reflects a constant periodic rate of return on the investment in the finance lease. The tax benefits arising from investment allowances on assets leased to clients are accounted for within direct taxation. |
| Type and description | Statement of financial position | Income statement | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IFRS 16 and IAS 17 – Lessor accounting policies continued | ||||
| Operating leases All leases that do not meet the criteria of a financial lease are classified as operating leases. |
The asset underlying the lease continues to be recognised and accounted for in terms of the relevant group accounting policies. Accruals for outstanding lease charges, together with a straight-line lease asset or liability, being the difference between actual payments and the straight-line lease income are recognised. |
Operating lease income net of any incentives given to lessees, is recognised on the straight-line basis, or a more representative basis where applicable, over the lease term and is recognised in operating income. When an operating lease is terminated before the lease period has expired, any payment received/(paid) by the group by way of a penalty is recognised as income/(expense) in the period in which termination takes place. |
||
| IFRS 16 – Lessor lease modifications | ||||
| Finance leases | When the group modifies the terms of a lease resulting in an increase in scope and the consideration for the lease increases by an amount commensurate with a stand-alone price for the increase in scope, the group accounts for these modifications as a separate new lease. All other lease modifications that are not accounted for as a separate lease are accounted for in terms of IFRS 9, unless the classification of the lease would have been accounted for as an operating lease had the modification been in effect at inception of the lease. These lease modifications are accounted for as a separate new lease from the effective date of the modification and the net investment in the lease becomes the carrying amount of the underlying asset. |
|||
| Operating leases | Modifications are accounted for as a new lease from the effective date of the modification. |
| Type and description | Statement of financial position | Income statement | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IAS 17 – Lessee accounting policies | ||||
| Finance leases Leases, where the group assumes substantially all the risk and rewards incidental to ownership, are classified as finance leases. |
The leased asset is capitalised at the inception of the lease at the lower of the fair value of the leased asset and the present value of the minimum lease payments together with an associated liability to the lessor. Refer to non-financial assets accounting policy for the treatment of the leased asset. Lease payments less the interest component, which is calculated using the interest rate implicit in the lease or the group's incremental borrowing rate, are recognised as a capital repayment which reduces the liability to the lessor. |
A lease finance cost, determined with reference to the interest rate implicit in the lease or the group's incremental borrowing rate, is recognised within interest expense over the lease period. |
||
| Operating leases All leases that do not meet the criteria of a financial lease are classified as operating leases. |
Accruals for unpaid lease charges, together with a straight-line lease asset or liability, being the difference between actual payments and the straight-line lease expense are recognised. |
Payments made under operating leases, net of any incentives received from the lessor, are recognised in operating expenses on a straight-line basis over the term of the lease. Contingent rentals are expensed as they are incurred. When an operating lease is terminated before the lease period has expired, any payment required to be made to the lessor by way of a penalty is recognised as operating expenses in the period in which termination takes place. |
212

Where subsidiaries purchase/(short sell) Standard Bank Group Limited's equity instruments, the consideration paid/ (received) is deducted/(added) from/(to) equity attributable to ordinary shareholders as treasury shares on consolidation.
Fair value changes recognised by subsidiaries on these instruments are reversed on consolidation and dividends received are eliminated against dividends paid. Where such shares are subsequently sold or reissued/(re-acquired) outside the group, any consideration received/(paid) is included in equity attributable to ordinary shareholders.
The group subscribed for 8.5% redeemable, cumulative, preference shares issued by the Tutuwa entities controlled by the group. The initial repurchase of group shares by the Tutuwa entities was treated as a reduction in the group's equity. Subsequent to the repurchase of the group shares, the Tutuwa entities containing these shares were sold to the black participants. The capital and dividends on the preference shares are repayable from future ordinary dividends received on group shares or from the disposal of the group's shares. As a result of the group's right to receive its own dividends back in the form of preference dividends and capital on the preference shares, the subsequent sale of the Tutuwa entities and consequent delivery of the group shares to the black participants (although legally effected) is not accounted for as a sale. The preference share investment in the Tutuwa entities is also not accounted for as an asset. The preference share asset is effectively eliminated against equity as a negative empowerment reserve.
As a consequence of the above, the IFRS accounting treatment followed until full redemption, or third-party financing, is as follows:
Incremental external costs directly attributable to a transaction that increases or decreases equity are deducted from equity, net of related tax. All other share issue costs are expensed.
Distributions are recognised in equity in the period in which they are declared. Distributions declared after the reporting date are disclosed in the distributions note to the annual financial statements.

Provisions are recognised when the group has a present legal or constructive obligation as a result of past events, it is probable that an outflow of resources embodying economic benefits will be required to settle the obligation and a reliable estimate of the amount of the obligation can be made. Provisions are determined by discounting the expected future cash flows using a pre-tax discount rate that reflects current market assessments of the time value of money and the risks specific to the liability. The group's provisions typically (when applicable) include the following:
Provisions for legal claims are recognised on a prudent basis for the estimated cost for all legal claims that have not been settled or reached conclusion at the reporting date. In determining the provision, management considers the probability and likely settlement (if any). Reimbursements of expenditure to settle the provision are recognised when and only when it is virtually certain that the reimbursement will be received.
A provision for restructuring is recognised when the group has approved a detailed formal plan, and the restructuring either has commenced or has been announced publicly. Future operating costs or losses are not provided for.
A provision for onerous contracts is recognised when the expected benefits to be derived by the group from a contract are lower than the unavoidable cost of meeting its obligations under the contract. The provision is measured at the present value of the lower of the expected cost of terminating the contract and the expected net cost of continuing with the contract. Before a provision is established, the group recognises any impairment loss on the assets associated with that contract.
Contingent assets are not recognised in the annual financial statements but are disclosed when, as a result of past events, it is probable that economic benefits will flow to the group, but this will only be confirmed by the occurrence or non-occurrence of one or more uncertain future events which are not wholly within the group's control.
Contingent liabilities include certain guarantees (other than financial guarantees) and letters of credit and are not recognised in the annual financial statements but are disclosed in the notes to the annual financial statements unless they are considered remote.

The group issues contracts that transfer insurance risk or financial risk or, in some cases, both.
An insurance contract is a contract under which the group (insurer) accepts significant insurance risk from the policyholder by agreeing to compensate the policyholder if a specified uncertain future event (the insured event) adversely affects the policyholder or, in the case of life annuities, the lifespan of the policyholder is greater than that assumed. Such contracts may also transfer financial risk. The group defines significant insurance risk as the possibility of having to pay benefits on the occurrence of an insured event that are significantly more than the benefits payable if the insured event did not occur.
Short-term insurance provides benefits under short-term policies, typically one year or less, which include engineering, fire, personal liability, marine and aviation, motor, personal accident, medical expenses, theft and the Workmen's Compensation Act, or a contract comprising a combination of any of those policies.
Investment contracts are those contracts that transfer financial risk with no significant insurance risk. Financial risk is the risk of a possible future change in one or more of a specified interest rate, financial instrument price, commodity price, foreign exchange rate, index of prices or rates, credit rating or credit index or other variable.
A number of insurance and investment contracts contain a DPF feature. This feature entitles the policyholder to receive, as a supplement to guaranteed benefits, additional benefits or bonuses at the discretion of the group. The terms and conditions or practice relating to these contracts are in accordance with the group's published Principles and Practices of Financial Management, as approved by the Financial Services Board (FSB). The terms 'reversionary bonus' and 'smoothed bonus' refer to the specific forms of DPF contracts underwritten by the group. All components in respect of DPFs are included in policyholders' assets and liabilities.
In terms of IFRS 4 Insurance Contracts (IFRS 4), insurance liabilities are measured under existing local practice. The group had, prior to the adoption of IFRS 4, adopted the Professional Guidance Notes (PGNs) issued by the ASSA to determine the liability in respect of insurance contracts issued in South Africa. The group has continued to value long-term insurance liabilities in accordance with these.
In 2012, the naming convention was changed and the term PGN was replaced with either APN or Standard Actuarial Practice (SAP) depending on whether the former PGN was best-practice or mandatory respectively.
These are available on the ASSA website – www.actuarialsociety.org.za.
Where applicable, the APNs and SAPs are referred to in the accounting policies and notes to the annual financial statements.
Policyholder contracts are classified into four categories, depending on the duration of or type of investment benefit or insurance risks. The accounting for each of these contracts are detailed below.
These contracts are valued in terms of the financial soundness valuation (FSV) basis as described in SAP 104 Life offices – valuation of long-term insurers (SAP 104), using a discounted cash flow methodology. The assets and liabilities are reflected as policyholders' assets and liabilities in the statement of financial position. The discounted cash flow methodology allows for premiums and benefits payable in terms of the contract, future administration expenses and commission, investment return, tax and any expected losses in respect of options.
The liability is based on assumptions of the best estimate of future experience, plus compulsory margins as required in terms of SAP 104, plus additional discretionary margins. Derivatives embedded in the group's insurance contracts are not separated and measured at fair value if the embedded derivative itself meets the definition of an insurance contract.
The liabilities in respect of the investment guarantees' underlying maturity and death benefits, and guaranteed annuity options are measured in accordance with APN 110 Reserving for minimum investment return guarantees on a market-consistent basis. Discretionary margins are held to ensure that the profit and risk margins in the premiums are not capitalised before it is probable that future economic benefits will flow to the entity.
These profits emerge over the lifetime of the contract in line with the risk borne by the group. Liabilities for individual marketrelated policies, where benefits are in part dependent on the performance of underlying investment portfolios, are taken as the aggregate value of the policies' investment in the investment portfolio at the valuation date (the unit reserve element), is then reduced by the excess of the present value of the expected future risk and expense charges over the present value of the expected future risk benefits and expenses on a policy-by-policy cash flow basis (the rand reserve element).
Reversionary bonus classes of policies, and policies with fixed and guaranteed benefits are valued by discounting the expected future cash flows at market-related rates of interest reduced by an allowance for investment expenses and the relevant compulsory margins (the guaranteed element). Future bonuses have been allowed for at the latest declared rates where appropriate. The rand reserve element of market-related policies and the guaranteed element in respect of other policies are collectively known as the rand reserve.
In respect of corporate life and lump sum disability business, no discounting of future cash flows is performed. However, a provision will be held if the expected guaranteed premiums under the current basis and investment returns in the short term are not sufficient to meet expected future claims and expenses. For corporate investment contracts with DPF, in addition to the value of the policies' investment in the investment portfolios held, an additional provision will be held if the expected fee recoveries in the short term are not sufficient to meet expected expenses.
Within the group all investment contracts invested in smoothed bonus portfolios are classified as investment contracts with DPF. In respect of insurance and investment contracts with DPF where bonuses are smoothed, bonus stabilisation provisions are held arising from the difference between the after taxation investment performance of the assets, net of the relevant management fees and the value of the bonuses declared. In accordance with SAP 104, where the bonus stabilisation provision is negative, this provision is restricted to an amount that can reasonably be expected to be recovered through distribution of bonuses during the ensuing three years. All bonus stabilisation provisions are included in policyholders' liabilities. The liability estimates are reviewed bi-annually. The effect of any change in estimates is recognised in profit or loss.
Where policyholders, in respect of certain policies, are entitled to a part surrender, any part surrender is treated as a derecognition of the policyholders' asset or liability.
Shadow accounting is applied to policyholder insurance contracts where the underlying measurement of the policyholder insurance liability depends directly on the fair value of any owner-occupied properties.
Any unrealised gains and losses on such owner-occupied properties are recognised in OCI. The shadow accounting adjustment to policyholder insurance contracts is recognised in OCI to the extent that the unrealised gains or losses, together with any related taxation on owner-occupied properties backing policyholder insurance liabilities, are also recognised directly in OCI.
Provision is made in policyholders' assets and liabilities for the estimated cost at the end of the year of claims incurred but not reported at that date. IBNR provisions for the main categories of business are calculated using run-off triangle techniques. These liabilities are not discounted due to the short-term nature of IBNR claims. Outstanding claims and benefit payments are stated gross of reinsurance.
At each reporting date the adequacy of the insurance liabilities is assessed. If that assessment shows that the carrying amount of insurance liabilities net of any related intangible PVIF business assets is inadequate in the light of the estimated future cash flows, then the deficiency is recognised in profit or loss.
216
Premiums and annuity considerations on insurance contracts, other than in respect of universally costed policies (policies where insurance risk charges are dependent on the excess of the sum assured over the value of units underlying the contract), recurring premium pure risk policies (collectively the Lifestyle series) and corporate schemes, are recognised when due in terms of the contract. Premiums receivable in respect of corporate schemes are recognised when there is a reasonable assurance of collection in terms of the policy contract. Premiums in respect of the Lifestyle series of policies are recognised when premiums are received, as failure to pay a premium will result in a reduction of attributable fund value, if available, or else in the lapse of the policy. Premium income on insurance contracts is recognised gross of reinsurance. Premiums are shown before deduction of commission.
Claims on insurance contracts, which include death, disability, maturity, surrender and annuity payments, are recognised in insurance benefits and claims paid when the group is notified of a claim, based on the estimated liability for compensation owed to policyholders. Changes in the provision for IBNR claims are also recognised in insurance benefits and claims paid. Reinsurance recoveries are accounted for in the same period as the related claims.
Acquisition costs for insurance contracts represent commission and other costs that relate to the securing of new contracts and the renewing of existing contracts. These costs are expensed as incurred in insurance benefits and claims paid.
The FSV method for valuing insurance contracts and investment contracts with DPF makes implicit allowance for the deferral of acquisition costs and hence no explicit deferred acquisition cost asset is recognised in the statement of financial position for these contracts.
The group issues investment contracts without fixed benefits (unit-linked and structured products) and investment contracts with fixed and guaranteed benefits (term certain annuity). Investment contracts without fixed benefits are financial liabilities whose fair value is dependent on the fair value of the underlying financial assets, derivatives and/or investment property and are designated at inception at fair value through profit or loss.
For investment contracts with fixed and guaranteed terms, future benefit payments and premium receipts are discounted using market-related rates at the reporting date. No initial profit is recognised immediately as any profit on initial recognition is amortised over the life of the contract.
Amounts received under investment contracts, such as premiums, are recorded as deposits to investment contract liabilities, whereas claims incurred are recorded as deductions from investment contract liabilities.
A DRL is recognised in respect of upfront fees, which are directly attributable to a contract, that are charged for investment management services. The DRL is then released to investment management and service fee income and gains when the services are provided, over the expected duration of the contract on a straight-line basis.
Regular charges billed in advance are recognised on a straight-line basis over the billing period, which is the period over which the service is rendered. Outstanding fees are accrued as a receivable in terms of the investment management contract.
Commissions paid and other incremental acquisition costs are incurred when new investment contracts are obtained or existing investment contracts are renewed. These costs are expensed as incurred, unless specifically attributable to an investment contract with an investment management service element. Such costs are deferred and amortised on a straight-line basis over the expected life of the contract (ten to 16 years for linked annuities, one year for corporate business and five years for other investment contracts), taking into account all decrements, as they represent the right to receive future management fees.
A DAC asset is recognised for all applicable policies with the amortisation being calculated on a portfolio basis. An impairment test is conducted annually at the reporting date on the DAC balance to ensure that the amount will be recovered from future revenue generated by the applicable remaining investment management contracts.
On certain investment contracts, policyholders have an option to switch some or all of their investment from a DPF fund to a non-DPF fund (and vice versa). The value of the liability held with respect to these contracts is taken at the aggregate value of the policyholder investment in the investment portfolio at the valuation date.
Gross premiums exclude VAT. Premiums are accounted for as income when the risk related to the insurance policy commences and are amortised over the contractual period of risk cover by using an unearned premium provision. All premiums are shown before deduction of commission payable to intermediaries.
The provision for unearned premiums represents the portion of the current year's premiums that relate to risk periods extending into the following year. The unearned premiums are calculated using a straight-line basis, except for those insurance contracts where allowance is made for uneven exposure.
Provision is made for underwriting losses that may arise from unexpired risks when it is anticipated that unearned premiums will be insufficient to cover future claims, as well as claims-handling fees and related administrative costs.
Provision is made on a prudent basis for the estimated final cost of all claims that had not been settled on the reporting date, less amounts already paid. Claims and loss adjustment expenses are charged to income as incurred based on the estimated liability for compensation owed to contract holders or third-parties damage by the contract holders. The group's own assessors or contracted external assessors individually assess claims. The claims provision includes an estimated portion of the direct expenses of the claims and assessment charges.
Provision is also made for claims arising from insured events that occurred before the close of the reporting period, but which had not been reported to the group at that date (IBNR claims). This provision is calculated using run-off triangle techniques. The provision for claims is not discounted for the time value of money due to the expected short duration to settlement.
Commissions that vary and are related to securing new contracts and renewing existing contracts are deferred over the period in which the related premiums are earned, and recognised as a current asset. All other costs are recognised as expenses within insurance benefits and claims paid when incurred.
A DRL is raised for any income receivable on the placement of reinsurance for risks arising from short-term insurance contracts. The DRL is released to income systematically over the coverage period of the respective reinsurance contract.
Receivables and payables related to insurance contracts and investment contracts are recognised when due. These include amounts due to and from agents, brokers and policyholders. Receivables and payables related to insurance contracts are subsequently measured in terms of IFRS 4, while those related to investment contracts are designated at fair value through profit or loss in terms of IFRS 9.
The group cedes some insurance risk in the normal course of business. Reinsurance contracts are contracts entered into by the group with reinsurers under which the group is compensated for the entire, or a portion of, losses arising on one or more of the insurance contracts issued by the group.
The expected benefits to which the group is entitled under its reinsurance contracts held are recognised as reinsurance assets and included in 'Other assets' in the statement of financial position. Reinsurance assets are assessed for impairment at each reporting date. Any impairment loss is recognised in profit or loss.
Outward reinsurance premiums are recognised as an expense and are accounted for in the same reporting period that premiums received are recognised as revenue in insurance premiums.

Deferred tax
| Type | Description, recognition and measurement | Offsetting |
|---|---|---|
| Direct taxation: current tax |
Current tax is recognised in the direct taxation line in the income statement except to the extent that it relates to a business combination (relating to a measurement period adjustment where the carrying amount of the goodwill is greater than zero), or items recognised directly in equity or in OCI. Current tax represents the expected tax payable on taxable income for the year, using tax rates enacted or substantively enacted at the reporting date, and any adjustments to tax payable in respect of previous years. |
Current and deferred tax assets and liabilities are offset if there is a legally enforceable right to offset current tax liabilities and assets, and they relate to income taxes levied by the same tax authority on the same |
| Direct taxation: deferred tax |
Deferred tax is recognised in direct taxation except to the extent that it relates to a business combination (relating to a measurement period adjustment where the carrying amount of the goodwill is greater than zero), or items recognised directly in equity or in OCI. Deferred tax is recognised in respect of temporary differences arising between the tax bases of assets and liabilities and their carrying values for financial reporting purposes. Deferred tax is measured at the tax rates that are expected to be applied to the temporary differences when they reverse, based on the laws that have been enacted or substantively enacted at the reporting date. Deferred tax is not recognised for the following temporary differences: • The initial recognition of goodwill; • The initial recognition of assets and liabilities in a transaction that is not a business combination, which affects neither accounting nor taxable profits or losses; and • Investments in subsidiaries, associates and jointly controlled arrangements (excluding mutual funds) where the group controls the timing of the reversal of temporary differences and it is probable that these differences will not reverse in the foreseeable future. |
taxable entity, or on different tax entities, but they intend to settle current tax liabilities and assets on a net basis or their tax assets and liabilities will be realised simultaneously. |
218
| Type | Description, recognition and measurement | Offsetting |
|---|---|---|
| Direct taxation: deferred tax continued |
The amount of deferred tax provided is based on the expected manner of realisation or settlement of the carrying amount of the asset or liability and is not discounted. |
|
| Deferred tax assets are recognised to the extent that it is probable that future taxable income will be available against which the unused tax losses can be utilised. Deferred tax assets are reviewed at each reporting date and are reduced to the extent that it is no longer probable that the related tax benefit will be realised. |
||
| Deferred income tax liabilities are provided on taxable temporary differences arising from investments in subsidiaries, associates and joint arrangements, except for deferred income tax liability where the timing of the reversal of the temporary difference is controlled by the group and it is probable that the temporary difference will not reverse in the foreseeable future. Generally, the group is unable to control the reversal of the temporary difference for associates unless there is an agreement in place that gives the group the ability to control the reversal of the temporary difference. |
||
| Deferred income tax assets are recognised on deductible temporary differences arising from investments in subsidiaries, associates and joint arrangements only to the extent that it is probable that the temporary difference will reverse in the future and there is sufficient taxable profit available against which the temporary difference can be utilised. |
||
| Indirect taxation |
Indirect taxes, including non-recoverable value added tax (VAT), skills development levies and other duties for banking activities, are recognised in the indirect taxation line in the income statement. |
Not applicable. |
| Dividend tax | Taxes on dividends declared by the group are recognised as part of the dividends paid within equity, as dividend tax represents a tax on the shareholder and not the group. Dividends tax withheld by the group on dividends paid to its shareholders and payable at the reporting date to the South African Revenue Service (where applicable) is included in 'Other liabilities' in the statement of financial position. |
Not applicable. |

| Description | Recognition and measurement |
|---|---|
| Net interest income | Interest income and expense (with the exception of borrowing costs that are capitalised on qualifying assets, that is assets that necessarily take a substantial period of time to get ready for their intended use or sale and which are not measured at fair value) are recognised in net interest income using the effective interest method for all interest-bearing financial instruments. In terms of the effective interest method, interest is recognised at a rate that exactly discounts estimated future cash payments or receipts through the expected life of the financial instrument or, where appropriate, a shorter period, to the net carrying amount of the financial asset or financial liability. Direct incremental transaction costs incurred and origination fees received, including loan commitment fees, as a result of bringing margin-yielding assets or liabilities into the statement of financial position, are capitalised to the carrying amount of financial instruments that are not at fair value through profit or loss and amortised as interest income or expense over the life of the asset or liability as part of the effective interest rate. Where the estimates of payments or receipts on financial assets or financial liabilities are subsequently revised, the carrying amount of the financial asset or financial liability is adjusted to reflect actual and revised estimated cash flows. The carrying amount is calculated by computing the present value of the adjusted cash flows at the financial asset or financial liability's original effective interest rate. Any adjustment to the carrying value is recognised in net interest income. When a financial asset is classified as stage 3 impaired, interest income is calculated on the impaired value (gross carrying amount less specific impairment) based on the original effective interest rate. The contractual interest income on the gross exposure is suspended and is only recognised in credit impairments when the financial asset is reclassified out of stage 3. Dividends received on preference share investments classified as debt form part of the group's lending activities and are included in interest income. |
| Net fee and commission revenue |
Fee and commission revenue, including accounting transaction fees, card-based commission, documentation and administration fees, electronic banking fees, foreign currency service fees, insurance-based fees and commissions, and knowledge-based fees and commissions are recognised as the related services are performed. Loan commitment fees for loans that are not expected to be drawn down are recognised on a straight-line basis over the commitment period. Loan syndication fees, where the group does not participate in the syndication or participates at the same effective interest rate for comparable risk as other participants, are recognised as revenue when the syndication has been completed. Syndication fees that do not meet these criteria are capitalised as origination fees and amortised to the income statement as interest income. The fair value of issued financial guarantee contracts on initial recognition is amortised as income over the term of the contract. Fee and commission expenses, included in net fee and commission revenue, are mainly transaction and service fees relating to financial instruments, which are expensed as the services are received. Expenditure is presented as fee and commission expenses where the expenditure is linked to the production of fee and commission revenue. |
| Trading revenue | Trading revenue comprises all gains and losses from changes in the fair value of trading assets and liabilities, together with related interest income, expense and dividends. |
220
| Description | Recognition and measurement |
|---|---|
| Customer loyalty programmes |
The group's banking activities operate a customer loyalty programme in terms of which it undertakes to provide goods and services to certain customers. The reward credits are accounted for as a separately identifiable component of the fee and commission income transactions of which they form a part. The consideration allocated to the reward credits is measured at the fair value of the reward credit and is recognised over the period in which the customer utilises the reward credits. Expenses relating to the provision of the reward credits are recognised in fee and commission expenses as and when they are incurred. |
| Dividend income | Dividends are recognised in interest income (other revenue) for debt (equity instruments) when the right to receipt is established. Scrip dividends are recognised as dividends received where the dividend declaration allows for a cash alternative. |
| Insurance premium revenue |
Insurance premium revenue includes life insurance premiums, health insurance premiums and short-term insurance premiums. |
| Investment income | Investment income for investment management and life insurance activities comprises mainly rental income from properties, interest, hotel operations' sales and dividends. Dividends are recognised when the right to receive payment is established and interest income is recognised using the effective interest method. Hotel operation sales comprise the fair value of the sale of accommodation, food and beverage, other guest facilities and rentals received. Revenue is shown net of VAT, returns, rebates and discounts. |
| Management fees on assets under management |
Fee income includes management fees on assets under management and administration fees. Management fees on assets under management are recognised over the period for which the services are rendered, in accordance with the substance of the relevant agreements. Administration fees received for the administration of medical schemes are recognised when the services are rendered. |
| Other gains/losses on financial instruments |
Includes: • Fair value gains and losses on financial assets that are classified at fair value through profit or loss (designated and default). • The gain or loss on the derecognition of a debt financial asset classified as at fair value through OCI. • Gains and losses arising from the derecognition of financial assets and financial liabilities classified as at amortised cost. • Gains and losses arising from the reclassification of a financial asset from amortised cost to fair value. • Gains and losses arising from the modification of a financial asset (which is not distressed) and financial liability as at amortised cost. • Fair value gains and losses on designated financial liabilities. |
| Short-term insurance income |
Includes premium income, commission and policy fees earned, as well as net incurred claim losses and broker commission paid. Annual business income is accounted for on the accrual basis and comprises the cash value of commission and fees earned when premiums or fees are payable directly to the group and comprises the cash value of commission earned when premiums are payable directly to the underwriters. |
| Other revenue | Other revenue comprises of revenue that is not included in any of the categories mentioned above this could include dividends on equity financial assets, underwriting profit from the group's short-term insurance operations and related insurance activities and re-measurement gains and losses from contingent consideration on disposals and purchases. |
Income and expenses are presented on a net basis only when permitted by IFRS, or for gains and losses arising from a group of similar transactions.

222
An operating segment is a component of the group engaged in business activities, whose operating results are reviewed regularly by management in order to make decisions about resources to be allocated to segments and assessing segment performance. The group's identification of segments and the measurement of segment results is based on the group's internal reporting to the chief operating decision maker.
The group commonly engages in trust or other fiduciary activities that result in the holding or placing of assets on behalf of individuals, trusts, post-employment benefit plans and other institutions. These assets and the income arising directly thereon are excluded from these annual financial statements as they are not assets of the group. However, fee income earned and fee expenses incurred by the group relating to the group's responsibilities from fiduciary activities are recognised in profit or loss.
The statutory credit risk reserve represents the amount by which local regulatory authorities within the group's Africa Regions operations require in addition to the IFRS impairment provision. Changes in this reserve are accounted for as transfers to and from retained earnings as appropriate.
Non-trading and capital related items primarily include the following:
The following new or revised standards, amendments and interpretations are not yet effective for the year ended 31 December 2019 and have not been applied in preparing these annual financial statements.
The amendments clarify the definition of a business, with the objective of assisting entities to determine whether a transaction should be accounted for as a business combination or as an asset acquisition. The amendment is not expected to have a material impact on the group.
Interest Rate Benchmark Reform resulted in amendments to IFRS 9, IAS 39 and IFRS 7 requirements for hedge accounting to support the provision of useful financial information during the period of uncertainty caused by the phasing out of interest-rate benchmarks such as interbank offered rates (IBORs) on hedge accounting. The amendments modify some specific hedge accounting requirements to provide relief from potential effects of the uncertainty caused by the IBOR reform. In addition, the amendments require companies to provide additional information to investors about their hedging relationships which are directly affected by these uncertainties.
Title: IFRS 10 and IAS 28 (amendments) Sale or Contribution of Assets between an Investor and its Associate or Joint Venture
The amendments address an inconsistency between the requirements in IFRS 10 and those in IAS 28, in dealing with the sale or contribution of assets between an investor and its associate or joint venture. The main consequence of the amendments is that a full gain or loss is recognised when a transaction involves a business (whether it is housed in a subsidiary or not). A partial gain or loss is recognised when a transaction involves assets that do not constitute a business, even if these assets are housed in a subsidiary. The amendments will be applied prospectively and are not expected to have a material impact on the group's financial statements.
This standard replaces IFRS 4 Insurance Contracts which provided entities with dispensation to account for insurance contracts (particularly measurement) using local actuarial practice, resulting in a multitude of different approaches.
The overall objective of IFRS 17 is to provide a more useful and consistent accounting model for insurance contracts among entities issuing insurance contracts globally. The standard requires an entity to measure insurance contracts using updated estimates and assumptions that reflect the timing of cash flows and any uncertainty relating to insurance contracts. A general measurement model (GMM) will be applied to long-term insurance contracts, and is based on a fulfilment objective (riskadjusted present value of best estimate future cash flows) and uses current estimates, informed by actual trends and investment markets. IFRS 17 establishes what is called a contractual service margin (CSM) in the initial measurement of the liability which represents the unearned profit on the contract and results in no gain on initial recognition. The CSM is released over the life of the contract, but interest on the CSM is locked in at inception rates. The CSM will be utilised as a "shock absorber" in the event of changes to best estimate cash flows. On loss making (onerous) contracts, no CSM is set up and the full loss is recognised at the point of contract inception. The GMM is modified for contracts which have participation features.
An optional simplified premium allocation approach (PAA) is available for all contracts that are less than 12 months at inception. The PAA is similar to the current unearned premium reserve profile over time.
The requirement to eliminate all treasury shares has been amended such that treasury shares held for a group of direct participating contracts or investment funds are not required to be eliminated and can be accounted for as financial assets.
These requirements will provide transparent reporting about an entity's financial position and risk and will provide metrics that can be used to evaluate the performance of insurers and how that performance changes over time. An entity may reassess its classification and designation of financial instruments under IFRS 9, on adoption of IFRS 17.
The standard will be applied retrospectively. The impact on the annual financial statements has not yet been fully determined.
The amendment clarifies how to classify debt and other liabilities as current or non-current. The objective of the amendment is aimed to promote consistency in applying the requirements by helping entities determine whether, debt and other liabilities with an uncertain settlement date should be classified as current (due or potentially due to be settled within one year) or non-current. The amendment also includes clarifying the classification requirements for debt an entity might settle by converting it into equity. These are clarifications, not changes, to the existing requirements, and so are not expected to affect entities' financial statements significantly. However, these clarifications could result in reclassification of some liabilities from current to non-current, and vice versa. The amendment will be applied retrospectively. The impact on the annual financial statements has not yet been fully determined.
| 2019 USDm* |
2019 GBPm* |
2019 EURm* |
CAGR** % |
||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Assets | |||||
| Cash and balances with central banks | 5 377 | 4 088 | 4 796 | 3 | |
| Financial investments, trading and pledged assets | 58 529 | 44 499 | 52 202 | 9 | |
| Loans and advances | 84 352 | 64 132 | 75 234 | 5 | |
| Current and deferred taxation assets | 348 | 264 | 310 | 17 | |
| Derivative and other assets | 7 235 | 5 501 | 6 453 | 4 | |
| Disposal group assets classified as held for sale | 186 | 141 | 166 | (59) | |
| Interest in associates and joint ventures | 387 | 294 | 345 | 8 | |
| Goodwill and other intangible assets | 1 594 | 1 212 | 1 422 | 1 | |
| Property and equipment | 1 573 | 1 196 | 1 403 | 6 | |
| Investment property | 2 441 | 1 856 | 2 177 | 5 | |
| Policyholders' assets | 501 | 381 | 447 | 2 | |
| Total assets | 162 523 | 123 564 | 144 955 | ||
| Equity and liabilities | |||||
| Equity | 14 961 | 11 375 | 13 344 | 5 | |
| Equity attributable to ordinary shareholders | 12 229 | 9 298 | 10 907 | 5 | |
| Equity attributable to other equity instrument | |||||
| holders | 785 | 597 | 700 | 15 | |
| Non-controlling interests | 1 947 | 1 481 | 1 737 | 7 | |
| Liabilities | 147 562 | 112 190 | 131 611 | 3 | |
| Deposit and debt funding | 101 859 | 77 441 | 90 848 | 6 | |
| Derivative and other liabilities | 13 827 | 10 512 | 12 332 | 6 | |
| Trading liabilities | 5 988 | 4 553 | 5 341 | 14 | |
| Current and deferred taxation liabilities | 648 | 493 | 578 | ||
| Non-current liabilities held for sale | 18 | 13 | 16 | (73) | |
| Subordinated debt | 2 064 | 1 569 | 1 841 | 3 | |
| Policyholders' liabilities | 23 158 | 17 607 | 20 654 | 2 | |
| Total equity and liabilities | 162 523 | 123 564 | 144 955 |
2014 Rm
* The foreign-denominated results above have been derived from the group's audited ZAR results by using the closing exchange rates. The foreign-denominated results above have not been audited and have been presented for illustrative purposes only. This illustration would not be equivalent to that which would have resulted had the group presented its results in a currency other than ZAR in terms of IAS 21 The Effects of Changes in Foreign Exchange Rates.
**Compound annual growth rate.
1 Restated. Refer to page 31 for more details on the restatements.
Exchange rates (rounded) utilised to convert the 31 December 2019 statement of financial position rand exchange rates (closing):
USD – 14.00 (2018: 14.38) GBP – 18.42 (2018: 18.31) EUR – 15.70 (2018: 16.44)
| 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rm | Rm | Rm | Rm | Rm | Rm |
| 75 288 | 85 145 | 75 310 | 77 474 | 75 112 | 64 302 |
| 819 498 | 749 517 | 714 993 | 632 396 | 607 352 | 537 146 |
| 1 181 067 | 1 119 547 | 1 048 027 | 1 065 405 | 1 076 917 | 928 241 |
| 4 868 | 4 519 | 2 109 | 2 467 | 2 415 | 2 213 |
| 101 308 | 74 192 | 98 606 | 87 851 | 131 741 | 82 324 |
| 2 599 | 762 | 219 958 | |||
| 5 423 | 10 376 | 9 665 | 8 196 | 9 703 | 3 727 |
| 22 323 | 23 676 | 23 329 | 23 675 | 24 031 | 21 175 16 737 |
| 22 018 34 180 |
19 194 33 326 |
16 179 32 226 |
16 041 31 155 |
17 670 30 508 |
27 022 |
| 7 017 | 6 708 | 7 484 | 7 314 | 7 579 | 6 507 |
| 2 275 589 | 2 126 962 | 2 027 928 | 1 951 974 | 1 983 028 | 1 909 352 |
| 209 484 | 199 063 | 190 017 | 179 359 | 178 908 | 161 634 |
| 171 229 | 165 061 | 157 020 | 150 757 | 151 069 | 136 985 |
| 10 989 | 9 047 | 9 047 | 5 503 | 5 503 | 5 503 |
| 27 266 | 24 955 | 23 950 | 23 099 | 22 336 | 19 146 |
| 2 066 105 | 1 927 899 | 1 839 911 | 1 772 615 | 1 804 120 | 1 747 718 |
| 1 426 193 | 1 357 537 | 1 243 911 | 1 213 621 | 1 186 514 | 1 047 212 |
| 193 599 | 164 527 | 175 324 | 169 583 | 232 569 | 146 558 |
| 83 847 | 59 947 | 62 855 | 47 867 | 43 304 | 43 761 |
| 9 073 | 8 015 | 8 614 | 8 317 | 9 398 | 8 980 |
| 246 | 237 | 182 069 | |||
| 28 901 | 26 359 | 24 289 | 25 997 | 27 141 | 25 521 |
| 324 246 | 311 277 | 322 918 | 307 230 | 305 194 | 293 617 |
| 2 275 589 | 2 126 962 | 2 027 928 | 1 951 974 | 1 983 028 | 1 909 352 |
Consolidated statement of financial position
**Compound annual growth rate.
USD – 14.00 (2018: 14.38) GBP – 18.42 (2018: 18.31) EUR – 15.70 (2018: 16.44)
1 Restated. Refer to page 31 for more details on the restatements.
* The foreign-denominated results above have been derived from the group's audited ZAR results by using the closing exchange rates. The foreign-denominated results above have not been audited and have been presented for illustrative purposes only. This illustration would not be equivalent to that which would have
Exchange rates (rounded) utilised to convert the 31 December 2019 statement of financial position rand exchange rates (closing):
resulted had the group presented its results in a currency other than ZAR in terms of IAS 21 The Effects of Changes in Foreign Exchange Rates.
| 2019 | 2019 | 2019 | CAGR** | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| USDm* | GBPm* | EURm* | % | ||
| Net interest income1 | 4 357 | 3 414 | 3 893 | 7 | |
| Non-interest revenue | 3 292 | 2 580 | 2 942 | 4 | |
| Net fee and commission revenue | 2 121 | 1 662 | 1 895 | 3 | |
| Trading revenue1 | 836 | 655 | 747 | 5 | |
| Other revenue1 | 283 | 222 | 253 | 3 | |
| Other gains and losses on financial instruments | 52 | 41 | 47 | 2 | |
| Income from banking activities | 7 649 | 5 994 | 6 835 | 6 | |
| Income from investment management and life | |||||
| insurance activities | 1 632 | 1 279 | 1 459 | (3) | |
| Insurance premiums received | 2 756 | 2 160 | 2 463 | 44 | |
| Revenue from contracts with customers | 282 | 221 | 252 | ||
| Interest income | 133 | 104 | 119 | 5 | |
| Insurance benefits and claims paid | (3 064) | (2 401) | (2 737) | ||
| Investment management and service fee income | |||||
| and gains | 225 | 176 | 201 | (39) | |
| Fair value adjustments to investment management | |||||
| liabilities and third-party fund interests | 1 300 | 1 019 | 1 161 | 11 | |
| Total income | 9 281 | 7 273 | 8 294 | 4 | |
| Credit impairment charges | (552) | (432) | (493) | (2) | |
| Income after credit impairment charges | 8 729 | 6 841 | 7 801 | 4 | |
| Operating expenses in banking activities | (4 317) | (3 382) | (3 857) | 6 | |
| Operating expenses in insurance activities | (1 142) | (895) | (1 020) | 3 | |
| Net income before non-trading and capital related | |||||
| items | 3 270 | 2 564 | 2 924 | 3 | |
| Non-trading and capital related items | (200) | (157) | (179) | 24 | |
| Share of post tax results from associates and joint | |||||
| ventures | (35) | (28) | (32) | (4) | |
| Net income before indirect taxation | 3 035 | 2 379 | 2 713 | ||
| Indirect taxation | (139) | (109) | (124) | (4) | |
| Profit before direct taxation Direct taxation |
2 896 (546) |
2 270 (428) |
2 589 (488) |
(1) | |
| Profit for the year from continuing operations | 2 350 | 1 842 | 2 101 | 3 | |
| Profit/(loss) for the year from discontinued operation | |||||
| Profit for the year | 2 350 | 1 842 | 2 101 | 7 | |
| Attributable to non-controlling interests and other | |||||
| equity instrument holders | 364 | 285 | 325 | 4 | |
| Attributable to group ordinary shareholders | 1 762 | 1 381 | 1 574 | 7 | |
| Headline earnings | 1 953 | 1 531 | 1 745 | 6 | |
* The foreign-denominated results above have been derived from the group's audited ZAR results by using the average exchange rates. The foreign-denominated results above have not been audited and have been presented for illustrative purposes only. This illustration would not be equivalent to that which would have resulted had the group presented its results in a currency other than ZAR in terms of IAS 21
The Effects of Changes in Foreign Exchange Rates. **Compound annual growth rate.
1 Restated. Refer to page 31 for more details on the restatements.
Exchange rates (rounded) utilised to convert the 31 December 2019 income statement rand exchange rates – (average):
ZAR exchange rates – (average)
USD 14.44 (2018: 13.23) GBP 18.43 (2018: 17.63) EUR 16.16 (2018: 15.60)
| 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rm | Rm | Rm | Rm | Rm | Rm |
| 62 919 | 59 505 | 60 125 | 56 892 | 49 310 | 45 152 |
| 47 542 | 45 826 | 42 574 | 42 965 | 41 803 | 38 891 |
| 30 622 | 30 375 | 28 670 | 29 012 | 26 920 | 26 079 |
| 12 075 | 10 799 | 10 731 | 10 988 | 11 016 | 9 294 |
| 4 089 | 3 863 | 3 173 | 2 965 | 3 867 | 3 518 |
| 756 | 789 | ||||
| 110 461 | 105 331 | 102 699 | 99 857 | 91 113 | 84 043 |
| 47 542 | 45 826 | 42 574 | 42 965 | 41 803 | 38 891 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 30 622 | 30 375 | 28 670 | 29 012 | 26 920 | 26 079 |
| 12 075 | 10 799 | 10 731 | 10 988 | 11 016 | 9 294 |
| 4 089 | 3 863 | 3 173 | 2 965 | 3 867 | 3 518 |
| 756 | 789 | ||||
| 110 461 | 105 331 | 102 699 | 99 857 | 91 113 | 84 043 |
| 23 573 | 21 722 | 24 394 | 21 365 | 23 997 | 21 209 |
| 39 801 | 38 521 | 38 020 | 1 750 | 688 | (6 476) |
| 4 076 | 4 073 | ||||
| 1 920 | 1 516 | ||||
| (44 241) | (26 484) | (43 848) | |||
| 3 245 | 3 533 | 43 957 | 22 887 | 36 791 | 38 743 |
| 18 772 | 563 | (13 735) | (3 272) | (13 482) | (11 058) |
| 134 034 | 127 053 | 127 093 | 121 222 | 115 110 | 105 252 |
| (7 964) | (6 489) | (9 410) | (9 533) | (9 371) | (9 009) |
| 126 070 | 120 564 | 117 683 | 111 689 | 105 739 | 96 243 |
| (62 335) | (60 084) | (57 049) | (56 235) | (51 434) | (46 596) |
| (16 486) | (16 404) | (17 800) | (17 374) | (16 184) | (14 546) |
| 47 249 | 44 076 | 42 834 | 38 080 | 38 121 | 35 101 |
| (2 890) | (641) | (261) | (1 123) | (1 512) | 986 |
| (512) | 912 | 1 102 | 187 | (323) | 626 |
| 43 847 | 44 347 | 43 675 | 37 144 | 36 286 | 36 713 |
| (2 592) | (2 609) | (2 481) | (2 418) | (2 739) | (2 439) |
| 41 255 | 41 738 | 41 194 | 34 726 | 33 547 | 34 274 |
| (10 559) | (9 095) | (10 479) | (8 932) | (8 187) | (8 061) |
| 30 696 | 32 643 | 30 715 | 25 794 | 25 360 | 26 213 |
| 2 741 | (4 048) | ||||
| 30 696 | 32 643 | 30 715 | 25 794 | 28 101 | 22 165 |
| 5 253 | 5 190 | 4 480 | (3 588) | (4 347) | (4 260) |
| 25 443 | 27 453 | 26 235 | 22 206 | 23 754 | 17 905 |
| 28 207 | 27 865 | 26 270 | 23 009 | 22 187 | 20 882 |
The Effects of Changes in Foreign Exchange Rates.
1 Restated. Refer to page 31 for more details on the restatements.
**Compound annual growth rate.
ZAR exchange rates – (average)
USD 14.44 (2018: 13.23) GBP 18.43 (2018: 17.63) EUR 16.16 (2018: 15.60)
* The foreign-denominated results above have been derived from the group's audited ZAR results by using the average exchange rates. The foreign-denominated results above have not been audited and have been presented for illustrative purposes only. This illustration would not be equivalent to that which would have resulted had the group presented its results in a currency other than ZAR in terms of IAS 21
Exchange rates (rounded) utilised to convert the 31 December 2019 income statement rand exchange rates – (average):
| CAGR** % |
2019 Rm |
2018 Rm |
2017 Rm |
2016 Rm |
2015 Rm |
2014 Rm |
||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Share statistics | ||||||||
| Dividend cover | times | 1.8 | 1.8 | 1.8 | 1.9 | 2.0 | 1.8 | |
| Dividend yield | % | 7 | 5.9 | 5.4 | 4.7 | 5.1 | 5.9 | 4.2 |
| Earnings yield | % | 7 | 10.5 | 9.8 | 8.4 | 9.5 | 12.0 | 7.5 |
| Price earnings ratio | times | (41) | 9.5 | 10.2 | 11.9 | 10.5 | 8.3 | 13.4 |
| Price-to-book | times | (2) | 1.6 | 1.8 | 2.0 | 1.6 | 1.2 | 1.7 |
| Number of shares traded | millions | (27) | 1 650.9 | 1 618.5 | 1 584.4 | 1 271.8 | 1 052.8 | 798 |
| Turnover in shares traded | % | 16 | 102 | 102 | 98 | 79 | 65 | 49 |
| Market capitalisation | Rm | 3 | 268 302 | 289 723 | 316 826 | 245 595 | 183 672 | 232 203 |
| Market indicators at 31 December | ||||||||
| Standard Bank Group share price | ||||||||
| High for the year | cents | 7 | 21 022 | 23 100 | 20 000 | 15 748 | 17 700 | 14 930 |
| Low for the year | cents | 7 | 15 860 | 15 392 | 13 401 | 9 700 | 9 480 | 11 416 |
| Closing | cents | 3 | 16 832 | 17 881 | 19 566 | 15 175 | 11 350 | 14 348 |
| Prime overdraft rate (closing) | % | 2 | 10.00 | 10.25 | 10.25 | 10.50 | 9.75 | 9.25 |
| JSE All Share Index – (closing) | 3 | 57 084 | 52 081 | 59 505 | 50 654 | 50 694 | 49 771 | |
| JSE Banks Index – (closing) | 4 | 87 310 | 91 617 | 96 187 | 77 545 | 61 072 | 72 998 | |
| ZAR exchange rates – (closing) | ||||||||
| USD | 4 | 14.00 | 14.38 | 12.31 | 13.69 | 15.50 | 11.57 | |
| GBP | 18.42 | 18.31 | 16.55 | 16.94 | 22.93 | 18.02 | ||
| EUR | 2 | 15.70 | 16.44 | 14.70 | 14.43 | 16.86 | 14.01 | |
| ZAR exchange rates – (average) | ||||||||
| USD | 6 | 14.44 | 13.23 | 13.30 | 14.69 | 12.75 | 10.84 | |
| GBP | 1 | 18.43 | 17.63 | 17.13 | 19.96 | 19.49 | 17.85 | |
| EUR | 2 | 16.16 | 15.60 | 15.02 | 16.26 | 14.14 | 14.39 |
| CAGR | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| % | Rm | Rm | Rm | Rm | Rm | Rm | ||
| Standard Bank Group | ||||||||
| Share statistics | ||||||||
| Number of ordinary shares listed on the JSE (millions) |
||||||||
| Weighted average | 0.0 | 1 594 | 1 594 | 1 602 | 1 598 | 1 597 | 1 585 | |
| End of period | 0.0 | 1 594 | 1 590 | 1 597 | 1 597 | 1 601 | 1 578 | |
| Share statistics per ordinary share | ||||||||
| (cents) | ||||||||
| Basic earnings | cents | 7.1 | 1 593.5 | 1 722.6 | 1 637.8 | 1 389.8 | 1 487.0 | 1 129.9 |
| Headline earnings | cents | 10.3 | 1 766.7 | 1 748.4 | 1 640.0 | 1 440.1 | 1 388.9 | 1 081.4 |
| Dividends | cents | 10.7 | 994 | 970 | 910 | 780 | 674 | 598 |
| Net asset value | cents | 4.3 | 10 741.6 | 10 380 | 9 830 | 9 442 | 9 434 | 8 682 |
| ROE | % | 5.2 | 16.8 | 18.0 | 17.1 | 15.3 | 15.6 | 13.0 |
| CAGR** % |
2019 Rm |
2018 Rm |
2017 Rm |
2016 Rm |
2015 Rm |
2014 Rm |
||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Capital adequacy1 | ||||||||
| Risk-weighted assets | Rm | 2 | 1 099 528 | 923 016 | 957 046 | 883 179 | 944 039 | 915 213 |
| Tier I capital2 | Rm | 7 | 147 981 | 151 925 | 136 293 | 126 188 | 125 710 | 117 970 |
| Total capital2 | Rm | 5 | 169 983 | 172 289 | 153 243 | 146 318 | 147 998 | 141 963 |
| Tier I capital to risk-weighted assets3 |
% | 13.46 | 14.1 | 14.2 | 14.3 | 13.3 | 12.9 | |
| Total capital to risk-weighted assets3 |
% | 15.46 | 16.0 | 16.0 | 16.6 | 15.7 | 15.5 | |
| Employee statistics | ||||||||
| Number of employees | ||||||||
| Banking activities | 44 996 | 47 419 | 48322 | 48 622 | 47 958 | 42 642 | ||
| Group | 50 691 | 53 178 | 54558 | 54 767 | 54 361 | 49 259 | ||
| Normalised headline earnings per employee |
Rm | 8 | 556 450 | 523 995 | 481 506 | 420 125 | 404 739 | 355 635 |
| Points of representation | ||||||||
| ATMs and ANAs* | 8970 | 7 239 | 7 362 | 7 189 | 7 193 | 7 065 | ||
| Banking branches and service centres |
1114 | 1 200 | 1 212 | 1 211 | 1 221 | 1 233 | ||
| Social investment | ||||||||
| and environment | ||||||||
| Corporate social investment spend2 |
Rm | 0.1 | 141.2 | 106.0 | 95.7 | 115.9 | 115.0 | |
| Carbon footprint (metric tons CO2)2 |
243 132 | 252 092 | 281 264 | 324 637 | 309 017 |
1 In accordance with Basel II principles relating to the treatment of insurance entities, insurance operations are excluded from the capital base of the banking group and its related risk-weighted assets. Capital in insurance operations in excess of statutory minimum requirements is not recognised in group capital.
2 South African banking activities only. 3 Capital includes unappropriated profit.
* Automated.
Members of the group provide discretionary and non-discretionary investment management services to institutional and private investors. Commissions and fees earned in respect of trust and management activities performed are included in profit or loss. Assets managed and funds administered on behalf of third-parties include:
| 2019 Rbn |
2018 Rbn |
|
|---|---|---|
| Banking activities Asset management |
260 | 371 |
| Trusts and estates Unit trusts/collective investments Segregated funds Portfolio management Other |
1 33 21 201 4 |
64 28 98 176 5 |
| Fund administration | 295 | 363 |
| Unit trusts/collective investments Segregated funds Portfolio management Other |
29 0 29 237 |
62 31 47 223 |
| Total Geographical area South Africa Africa Regions International |
555 71 400 84 |
734 71 544 119 |
| Liberty Asset management |
66 | 55 |
| Segregated funds | 66 | 55 |
| Wealth management – funds under administration | 334 | 337 |
| Single manager unit trust Institutional marketing Linked and structured life products Multi-manager Rest of Africa |
133 64 88 21 28 |
122 64 80 20 51 |
| Total Liberty | 400 | 392 |
| Total assets under management and funds under administration | 955 | 1 126 |
Included in the balances above are funds for which the fund value is determined using directors' valuations.
Registration No. 1969/017128/06 Incorporated in the Republic of South Africa
Investor relations Sarah Rivett-Carnac Tel: +27 11 631 6897
Arno Daehnke Tel: +27 11 636 3756 Group secretary
233 STANDARD BANK GROUP
Annual financial statements 2019
Zola Stephen Tel: +27 11 631 9106
9th Floor, Standard Bank Centre 5 Simmonds Street, Johannesburg 2001 PO Box 7725, Johannesburg 2000 www.standardbank.com
Please direct all annual report queries and comments to: [email protected]
Please direct all customer-related queries and comments to: [email protected]
Please direct all investor relations queries and comments to: [email protected]
This document contains certain statements that are 'forward-looking' with respect to certain of the group's plans, goals and expectations relating to its future performance, results, strategies and objectives. Words such as "may", "could", "will", "expect", "intend", "estimate", "anticipate", "aim", "outlook", "believe", "plan", "seek", "predict" or similar expressions typically identify forward-looking statements. These forwardlooking statements are not statements of fact or guarantees of future performance, results, strategies and objectives, and by their nature, involve risk and uncertainty because they relate to future events and circumstances which are difficult to predict and are beyond the group's control, including but not limited to, domestic and global economic conditions, market-related risks such as fluctuations in interest rates and exchange rates, the policies and actions of regulatory authorities (including changes related to capital and solvency requirements), the impact of competition, as well as the impact of changes in domestic and global legislation and regulations in the jurisdictions in which the group and its affiliates operate. The group's actual future performance, results, strategies and objectives may differ materially from the plans, goals and expectations expressed or implied in the forward-looking statements. The group makes no representations or warranty, express or implied, that these forward-looking statements will be achieved and undue reliance should not be placed on such statements. The group undertakes no obligation to update the historical information or forward-looking statements in this document and does not assume responsibility for any loss or damage arising as a result of the reliance by any party thereon.

Cover
standardbank.com
Standard Bank Group
GOVERNANCE AND REMUNERATION REPORT 2019
Building tools?
Free accounts include 100 API calls/year for testing.
Have a question? We'll get back to you promptly.