Annual Report • Dec 31, 2011
Annual Report
Open in ViewerOpens in native device viewer
Report and accounts 2011
| Directors and advisers | 2 |
|---|---|
| Chairman's statement | 3 |
| Report of the directors | 6 |
| Corporate governance | 14 |
| Statement of directors' responsibilities | 17 |
| Remuneration report | 18 |
| Consolidated income statement | 21 |
| Statement of comprehensive income | 22 |
| Consolidated balance sheet | 23 |
| Company balance sheet | 24 |
| Consolidated cash flow statement | 25 |
| Company cash flow statement | 26 |
| Statement of changes in equity | 27 |
| Accounting policies | 28 |
| Notes to the accounts | 36 |
| Report of the independent auditors | 72 |
| Five year record | 74 |
| Directors | M C Perkins, FCA | Chairman (iii) |
|---|---|---|
| C J Relleen, FCA | Deputy chairman, independent non-executive | |
| director and senior independent director (i) (ii) (iii) | ||
| C J Ames, MA FCA | Joint managing director | |
| M Dünki | Non-executive director | |
| P J Field | Joint managing director | |
| A K Mathur, FCA | Finance director | |
| D A Reeves, MSc | Non-executive director (i) | |
| C P T Vaughan-Johnson, FCIB | Independent non-executive director (i) (ii) (iii) | |
| (i) Member of audit committee | ||
| (ii) Member of remuneration committee | ||
| (iii) Member of nomination committee | ||
| Secretary | J A Morton | |
| Executive committee | M C Perkins | Chairman |
| A K Mathur | Finance | |
| C J Ames | Joint managing director | |
| P J Field | Joint managing director | |
| I Ahmed | Bangladesh | |
| G A Mclean | Kenya, Malawi and South Africa | |
| A Singh | India | |
| J A Morton | Company secretary | |
| Registered office | Linton Park | |
| Linton | ||
| Near Maidstone | ||
| Kent ME17 4AB | ||
| Registered Number 29559 | ||
| Registrars | Capita Registrars | |
| The Registry | ||
| 34 Beckenham Road | ||
| Beckenham | ||
| Kent BR3 4TU | ||
| Independent auditors | PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP | |
| Chartered Accountants and Statutory Auditors | ||
| 1 Embankment Place | ||
| London WC2N 6RH | ||
| Website | www.camellia.plc.uk |
The profit before tax for the year to 31 December 2011 amounted to £58.65 million compared with £73.14 million in the previous year. The profit for 2011 includes a gain of £7.3 million (£11.1 million in 2010) in respect of changes in the fair value of biological assets. This gain is unrealised and is dependent on the maintenance of the value of those companies subject to IAS 41 "Biological Assets". The group performed well in 2011 with a trading profit of £39.23 million compared to £48.38 million in 2010 which had benefited from unusually high tea production.
The board is recommending a final dividend of 84p per share which, together with the interim dividend already paid of 30p per share, brings the total distribution for the year to 114p per share compared with 110p per share in 2010.
In 2011 our tea operations continued to benefit from an increase in demand over supply resulting in high sales prices. Profitability has been adversely affected by increases in input costs and slightly lower production following less favourable weather conditions compared with the prior year.
Despite the 34 per cent. increase in tea garden wages and uncertainties in the market during the year, our Indian operations achieved a satisfactory outcome. Tea production increased to 31.8 million kilos and prices generally remained firm. Factory developments and infrastructure expenditure continued during the year.
Both the packet tea operations and the instant tea plant achieved improved results.
Tea production at 10.3 million kilos suffered a decline over the previous year due to pest and weather related problems. The import of tea by local blenders also caused a significant reduction in auction prices. However the increase of import duty on tea has led to a hardening of sale prices and it is to be hoped that such duty will not be temporary.
The programme of factory redevelopment and installation of irrigation systems is continuing.
Production in Kenya decreased on our own estates. Smallholder leaf intake increased slightly but our overall production was down during the year to 22.8 million kilos from a record 26.5 million kilos in 2010. The strength of the market resulted in high prices on the Mombasa auction and, as a result, profitability was similar to the previous year. Little progress has been made on implementing the necessary legislative reforms relating to the new constitution. Ambiguities on the future of land tenure are still to be resolved but all leasehold property owned by non-Kenyan citizens or corporations are subject to a maximum term of 99 years. The timing of the next elections under the new constitution and the outcome of the International Criminal Court Proceedings are the subject of considerable debate.
Our production in Malawi at 17.7 million kilos was below the 19.3 million kilos produced in 2010 due to less favourable weather conditions. In September a fire destroyed one of our tea processing factories in Thyolo district. A mothballed factory has been reopened and re-equipped on a temporary basis to ensure sufficient production facilities for the current season. Negotiations are continuing with the insurance company to settle our claim. The first major upgrade in the programme of improvements to our factories was completed during the year. The factory is operating successfully and the quality of tea produced is showing an improvement. The Malawi Kwacha devalued during the year but remains unrealistically firm and foreign exchange continues to be critically short resulting in difficulties in procuring imports, particularly fuel and fertilisers.
2011 was an 'off-year' in the biennial bearing pattern of the pistachio orchards of Horizon Farms in California and production was minimal.
Macadamia production in Malawi was the highest on record. Our South African operation suffered from reduced production due to inclement weather but sales prices increased significantly during the year resulting in very satisfactory profits. Demand from the Far East remains buoyant. New areas of macadamia continued to be planted at Kakuzi in Kenya and at Maclands in South Africa.
Kakuzi's avocado production in Kenya decreased but profitability increased due to substantially higher sale prices caused by the weaker Kenyan shilling and a shortage of supply in the European market. Port and shipping logistics remain problematic and, combined with the risk of piracy, continue to be a cause for concern for this perishable crop.
Weather conditions in Bangladesh hampered latex collection and consequently rubber production declined from the previous year's level. Prices however continued their firmer trend.
Maize and soya yields combined with improved market prices resulted in a satisfactory performance from CC Lawrie's farm in Brazil. We continue to increase our irrigation capacity but future opportunities in this regard are now limited. The possible expansion of our agricultural operations in Brazil is on hold pending the outcome of deliberations by the government regarding the extent of foreign ownership of agricultural land.
Citrus production at Horizon Farms in California increased over the prior year but profitability decreased following a substantial reduction in prices caused by undersized fruit.
Production of wine grapes in South Africa improved marginally and the quality of wine produced is pleasing. The sales of everyday wines are showing positive results and the marketing efforts are being concentrated on improving premium quality wine sales.
In the UK, Associated Cold Stores and Transport (ACS&T) returned to profit after a very difficult year in 2010 as the effects of the financial crisis impacted our customers. The marketplace continues to suffer from over capacity and the management team is to be commended for the improvement in cold storage utilisation levels achieved during the year. ACS&T has net cash and is well placed to take advantage of any opportunities that might arise in the future.
Both our businesses in the Netherlands suffered from the impact of the double dip recession in the Netherlands and made losses during the year after producing satisfactory profits in 2010.
2011 was another challenging year for our UK based engineering companies, notwithstanding an improvement in revenue compared with the prior year and the achievement of a modest trading profit overall. The new factory at Abbey Metal became fully operational in the latter part of 2011. Limited sales were achieved from their paint shop operations during the year. Customer certifications have now been received for the new site and the scale of enquiries is encouraging. AKD had a slow start to the year, however trading picked up in the second half of the year and the order book is currently healthy. Loddon Engineering's performance continues to be weak and has not achieved what we had hoped for due to the lack of demand in the UK stabling market and securing fewer export orders. GU Cutting and Grinding Services had significant one off costs as a result of the move of premises but will now be well placed to develop its business for the future with increased capacity and new equipment. BMT felt the effects of the downturn in the construction sector. AJT Engineering had a satisfactory year at each of its locations in Aberdeen, Port Glasgow and East Kilbride. The major facilities upgrade was completed at the AJT Altens site and its operations are now being integrated with those on the Tullos site.
Profit before tax in Duncan Lawrie increased over last year and it successfully increased its current account base. Net fee and commission income rose during the year and despite significant fluctuations in the global stock markets, investment management revenues achieved satisfactory levels of growth overall. The bank continues with its conservative policy of restricting its lending book to the equivalent of shareholder's funds. Depositors' funds are placed with only the highest rated financial institutions or with the Bank of England. This policy does of course severely restrict margins but is considered appropriate to protect our customers' funds in these uncertain times. The capital base of the bank comfortably exceeds the requirements of the regulatory authority. Considerable effort and expenditure are being deployed in raising the awareness in the marketplace of the bank's very high level of service and its conservative operating policy.
Our shareholding in West Hamilton Holdings has fallen from 28.2 per cent. to 14.1 per cent. following a rights issue which was not taken up by us. As a result, with effect from 1 August 2011 West Hamilton was reclassified from an associated company to an available-for-sale investment.
As previously announced the proposed sale of our shareholdings in United Leasing and United Insurance in Bangladesh did not materialise and, with effect from 1 January 2011, these companies have been reclassified from assets held for sale to associated companies.
The group continues with its policy of developing existing businesses. Considerable further expenditure in the year related to on-going investment in the tea operations, edible nuts and engineering facilities. The development of Duncan Lawrie, as referred to above, is also a priority. The group has a significant portfolio of listed investments and freehold properties and this portfolio will be added to as and when appropriate opportunities arise.
It is again my pleasure to thank all our staff for the very professional manner in which they have discharged their duties over the past year.
M C Perkins Chairman 26 April 2012
The directors present their report together with the audited accounts for the year ended 31 December 2011.
The company is a holding company and its country of incorporation is England. The principal activities of its subsidiary and associated undertakings comprise:
Agriculture and horticulture – the production of tea, edible nuts, citrus, rubber, fruits, other horticultural produce and general farming Engineering – metal finishing, fabrication, precision engineering and heat treatment Food storage and distribution Private banking and financial services The holding of investments
Further details of the group's activities are included in the chairman's statement on pages 3 to 5.
The profit for the year amounted to £41,790,000 (2010: £51,034,000). The board has proposed a final dividend for the year of 84p per share payable on 6 July 2012 to holders of ordinary shares registered at the close of business on 15 June 2012. The total dividend for 2011 is therefore 114p per share (2010: 110p per share). Details are shown in note 10 on page 42.
The directors of the company are listed on page 2. The following directors had beneficial interests in the share capital of the company:
| 31 December | 1 January | |
|---|---|---|
| Camellia Plc ordinary shares of 10p each: | 2011 | 2011 |
| M C Perkins | 1,573 | 1,573 |
| C P T Vaughan-Johnson | 1,000 | 1,000 |
There have been no changes in the interests of directors between 31 December 2011 and the date of this report.
Under the company's articles of association all the directors are required to retire annually. Accordingly, Mr M C Perkins, Mr C J Relleen, Mr C J Ames, Mr M Dünki, Mr P J Field, Mr A K Mathur, Mr D A Reeves, and Mr C P T Vaughan-Johnson retire and, being eligible, seek re-election.
None of the directors or their families had a material interest in any contract of significance with the company or any subsidiary during and at the end of the financial year.
Mr M C Perkins was appointed a director in 1999 and chairman in 2001 having joined Eastern Produce (Holdings) Limited (now Linton Park Plc) in 1972. He is a chartered accountant. Mr Perkins is also chairman of Duncan Lawrie Holdings Limited and chairman of the nomination committee.
Mr C J Ames, a chartered accountant, is a joint managing director of Camellia Plc, a non-executive director of Kakuzi Limited and a non-executive director of Duncan Lawrie Holdings Limited. He was previously managing director of Douglas Deakin Young Limited which was acquired by the Camellia group in 2005. Prior to that he was a partner of PricewaterhouseCoopers.
Mr P J Field is a joint managing director of Camellia Plc, is chairman of Goodricke Group Limited and from 30 April 2010 a non-executive director of Duncan Lawrie Holdings Limited. Before joining the group in 1987, Mr Field was with Grindlays Bank engaged primarily with their business in the Indian subcontinent.
Mr A K Mathur, is a chartered accountant and joined the group in 1981. He was appointed finance director in 1999 and is also a director of Goodricke Group Limited.
Mr C J Relleen was formerly a partner in PricewaterhouseCoopers. He was appointed an independent nonexecutive director and deputy chairman in January 2006 having previously been a non-executive director of Linton Park Plc. Mr Relleen is also a non-executive director of Duncan Lawrie Holdings Limited. He is the senior independent director, chairman of the audit committee and a member of the nomination and remuneration committees.
Mr M Dünki was appointed a non-executive director on 1 April 2010. Mr M Dünki was a director of Rahn & Bodmer Co., a Zurich based private bank until 31 January 2012. He is also a director of The Camellia Private Trust Company Limited and a trustee of The Camellia Foundation and a director of Camellia Holding AG.
Mr D A Reeves was appointed a director in 2001. Following a long career with the Bank of England, Mr Reeves joined the group in 1998 and was managing director of Duncan Lawrie Limited. He became a non-executive director of the company in 2002 and is a member of the audit committee. Mr Reeves is a director of The Camellia Private Trust Company Limited and a trustee of The Camellia Foundation and a director of Camellia Holding AG.
Mr C P T Vaughan-Johnson, who was formerly president and chief executive officer of the Bank of Bermuda, was appointed a director in 1999. He is chairman of the remuneration committee and a member of the audit and nomination committees. Mr Vaughan-Johnson was also a non-executive director of Duncan Lawrie Holdings Limited until 1 June 2011.
In March 2011, Mr M D Conway resigned as the company secretary and Mr A K Mathur was appointed in his place.
On 8 September 2011, Mr A K Mathur resigned as the company secretary and Mrs J A Morton was appointed in his place.
The company is required to set out in this report a fair review of the business of the group during the year ended 31 December 2011 and a description of principal risks and uncertainties facing the group. A fair review of the business of the group is incorporated within the chairman's statement on pages 3 to 5. The chairman's statement together with information contained within the report of the directors highlight the key factors affecting the group's development and performance. Other matters are dealt with below:
There are a number of possible risks and uncertainties that could impact the group's businesses. As the group's businesses are widely spread both in terms of activity and location, it is unlikely that any one single factor could have a material impact on the group's long-term performance. The following risks relating to the group's principal operations have been identified:
The group's agricultural based businesses are located in Kenya, Malawi, South Africa, Bangladesh, India, Brazil and the USA. The success of these activities is greatly dependent on climatic conditions, the control of plant disease, the cost of labour and the market price for the produce. We export a considerable amount of produce through the port of Mombasa in Kenya. Such exports can be seriously delayed by inefficiencies in the operation of the port. In addition, exports from these businesses are subject to foreign exchange fluctuations as products, particularly those from Africa, are normally priced in US dollars.
In Kenya and South Africa there are long-term issues concerning land ownership over which the group has little control but monitors closely.
The board continues to work with local management to monitor land ownership issues that may impact the group's operations. In Kenya, the length of the leases owned by non-Kenyan citizens and corporations has been reduced from 999 years to 99 years in accordance with the new constitution. In South Africa, on land where ownership claims have been made, any substantiated claim is required to be resolved on a willing buyer willing seller basis and crops are generally only planted following notification to the Land Claims Commission.
In India, violence from separatist groups which has been a problem for some years has recently been greatly reduced in Assam. Over the last four years, there has been an increase in activity by separatist groups in Darjeeling and the Dooars. The situation continues to be monitored and the group's operations in these regions have generally been able to trade normally.
A number of the UK engineering companies are dependent for a significant part of their revenue on the aerospace and the oil and gas industries. A downturn in either of these sectors would have an impact on the level of activity in these businesses.
Some of the processes used by the companies involved in metal treatment require high standards of health and safety and environmental management. Failure to maintain these standards could give rise to accidents or environmental damage.
Cold storage and transport in the UK is a highly competitive industry and is largely dependent on the food industry for the utilisation of cold stores.
Cold stores are heavy users of electricity and any significant movement in energy costs can affect the operation's profitability. Similarly, the transport division is affected by sharp movements in the cost of fuel.
The business is dependent upon a sophisticated computer system. The failure of this system could have significant consequences for the business although a disaster recovery plan is in place.
Duncan Lawrie Limited is regulated by the Financial Services Authority (FSA) and has a well developed compliance process. The following risks have been identified:
Duncan Lawrie Limited has no exposure to the sub-prime mortgage market but in periods of low interest rates and low stock market values its income stream will inevitably be affected. Bank failures in the jurisdiction within which Duncan Lawrie operates can also impact its results as a consequence of industry wide compensation schemes to which it is required to contribute.
Further information on the group's financial risks are disclosed in note 37 of the accounts.
The group owns a number of investments including listed investments. The value of these investments is therefore likely to fluctuate in line with global stock market movements.
There is one final salary scheme in the UK, following the merger of three schemes during the year. It is closed to new entrants and permits an element of future accrual for existing members in the defined benefit section. A material proportion of the assets of the scheme are invested in equities and the value of these assets will fluctuate in line with global equity markets. Continuing improvements in mortality rates may also increase the liabilities of the scheme.
Credit control procedures are in place throughout the group but the risk remains that some customers may have difficulty making payments.
The group has a wide range of businesses operating around the world in diverse commercial, cultural and regulatory environments. These businesses encompass a correspondingly wide spectrum of employment and environmental issues and our main challenge is to ensure that these are consistently managed across the group.
The group's businesses have a duty to meet local regulatory requirements and will always strive to do so. In this respect, there is a distinction between our UK businesses and our agricultural and horticultural businesses based mostly in developing countries. Whilst the UK businesses are subject to well developed regulatory regimes in the areas of employment and environmental protection, this is not necessarily the case elsewhere. Our agricultural and horticultural businesses have however more than responded to the increasing amount of relevant local legislation and to the demands of the marketplace, as many of our major customers for agricultural products now expect us to meet their own social and environmental standards, or to achieve certification against recognised international standards such as 'Fairtrade' labelling.
Particular challenges and opportunities for the group lie in the following areas:
Child labour: We have a clear policy not to use child labour and all of our businesses meet local legal requirements. The minimum legal working age varies around the world and in some countries it is both the cultural norm and permissible for parents to involve their children in the productive process. We do not subscribe to this approach and therefore translating our policy into unambiguous local rules and enforcing these rules requires vigilance.
Health and safety: Our UK, European and North-American businesses operate in a strong regulatory climate, and have a good health and safety culture and record. Achieving equivalent standards of health and safety management in our operations in some developing countries is a continuing challenge.
Medical care and education: In some countries, our workers and their children do not have access to good state provision of medical or educational services. However, the majority of tea estates in India and Bangladesh have a hospital and a qualified doctor and our operations in both these countries have central group hospitals to which more serious illnesses are referred. A number of our African businesses report a high incidence of HIV/AIDS related illnesses. We provide, as a very minimum, basic medical services including where appropriate retroviral drugs, and give support to schools that are either run by our companies, or in the local neighbourhood.
Casual labour: Some of our agricultural businesses rely on seasonal labour, notably at harvest time. Our agricultural companies give casual and contract workers employment rights in accordance with local legislation.
Environmental management: Our UK-based engineering businesses have the greatest potential to create pollution and hazardous waste and need to meet tight legislative standards. Where appropriate, our UK businesses have formal environmental management systems in place and most are independently certified to the international standard ISO 14001. The enforcement of environmental legislation in many countries where we operate is poor and our businesses in these locations have to act on their own initiative to meet international standards of environmental protection.
We believe that good management of employment and environmental issues is essential in ensuring the long-term success of our businesses. We are therefore committed to devoting the resources necessary to continually improve our performance with the same vigour that we apply to other aspects of managing our business.
The board has a corporate social responsibility policy which is available on the company's website and which has been adopted across the group.
In December 2011, the board adopted a new anti-bribery policy which complies with the requirements of the Bribery Act 2010 which came into force during the year. The policy is being introduced across the group. The board does not permit bribery as part of its business practices.
There are no current employment or environmental issues that prejudice the continuing development of the group. No group businesses were prosecuted for any significant breach of employment or environmental legislation during 2011. The executive committee has established a process for ensuring that the corporate social responsibility policy is enforced across the group.
The nature of the group's principal activities is such that the board takes a long-term view on its operations, particularly in agriculture. It is also concerned to improve the quality of the group's assets over the long-term and monitors that by reference to return on segmental assets achieved in the main segments of the business which are then compared against budget. The returns achieved in the current and prior year were as follows:
| Agriculture and horticulture |
Engineering | Food storage and distribution |
Banking and financial services |
|||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2011 | 2010 | 2011 | 2010 | 2011 | 2010 | 2011 | 2010 | |
| Segment net assets (£'000) | 224,549 224,265 | 19,379 17,363 | 17,366 17,257 | 36,549 38,288 | ||||
| Segment trading profit/(loss) (£'000) | 43,807 54,013 | 253 | 256 | 51 | (670) | 485 | 275 | |
| Return on segmental assets (%) | 19.51 | 24.08 | 1.31 | 1.47 | 0.29 | (3.88) | 1.33 | 0.72 |
Segment net assets (segment assets less segment liabilities) and segment profit are as reported in the consolidated accounts.
The board's objective is to ensure that gross borrowings as a percentage of tangible net assets do not exceed 50%. The ratio achieved was 2.39% (2010: 2.0%).
Gross borrowings and tangible net assets (share capital and reserves less goodwill and intangible assets) are derived from the consolidated accounts.
The following information has been compiled based on data provided by a majority of the group's subsidiary undertakings. The board considers that this information demonstrates the level of compliance with important elements of its business principles. The board will regularly review which key non-financial performance indicators are most appropriate.
| Agriculture and |
Food storage and |
Banking and financial |
|||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| horticulture | Engineering | distribution | services | ||||||||||
| 1 Compliance | 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | |
| a) Prosecutions | The number of prosecutions | ||||||||||||
| brought in the financial year | |||||||||||||
| by the official regulatory bodies | |||||||||||||
| responsible for enforcing | |||||||||||||
| regulations in the areas of: | |||||||||||||
| Employment | 1 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | |
| Worker health and safety | 1 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | |
| Environmental protection | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | |
| b) Formal | The number of written | ||||||||||||
| warnings | warnings during the financial | ||||||||||||
| year by the official regulatory | |||||||||||||
| bodies responsible for | |||||||||||||
| enforcing regulations in the | |||||||||||||
| areas of: Employment |
2 | – | – | ||||||||||
| Worker health and safety | 2 | – – |
– – |
– – |
– – |
– – |
– | – – |
– – |
– | – – |
– – |
|
| Environmental protection | – | – | 2 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | |
| 2 Child Labour | |||||||||||||
| a) Minimum age The number of employees who | |||||||||||||
| were less than 15 years old | |||||||||||||
| during the financial year | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | |
| b) Access to | The number of employees | ||||||||||||
| education | who were younger than the | ||||||||||||
| age for completing compulsory | |||||||||||||
| education in their country | |||||||||||||
| during the financial year | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | |
| 3 Accidents | |||||||||||||
| a) Injury | The number of injuries | ||||||||||||
| received at work resulting in | |||||||||||||
| either absence from work for more | |||||||||||||
| than three days, or the injured | |||||||||||||
| person being unable to do | |||||||||||||
| the full range of their normal | |||||||||||||
| duties for more than three days | 565(ii) | 685(ii) | 128 | 1 | 6 | 1 | 11 | 4 | 4 | – | – | – | |
| 4 Health | |||||||||||||
| a) Sickness absence |
The number of employee days absence as a result of sickness |
||||||||||||
| during the financial year | 229,637(i)180,438(i)165,520(i) | 1,563 | 1,550 | 486 | |||||||||
| b) Sickness | The number of claims for | 2,384 | 3,580 | 1,779 | 2,431 | 571 | 870 | ||||||
| claims | compensation arising from | ||||||||||||
| occupational health issues | |||||||||||||
| received during the financial | |||||||||||||
| year in respect of continuing | |||||||||||||
| operations | 389(ii) | 482(ii) | 246 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | – | – | – | |
(i) This excludes tea garden workers in India who have a contractual entitlement to fourteen days sickness absence. It should be noted that in Malawi there is high level of sickness due to HIV/AIDS related conditions and malaria.
(ii) Injury and sickness claim figures now include those from operations in Malawi which were unavailable in 2009.
As at 26 April 2012 the company had been advised of the following interests in the share capital of the company:
Camellia Private Trust Company Limited held through its subsidiary, Camellia Holding AG 1,427,000 ordinary shares (51.34 per cent. of total voting rights).
Taube Hodson Stonex & Partners Limited held through State Street Nominees Limited 227,176 ordinary shares (8.17 per cent. of total voting rights).
Alcatel Bell Pensioenfonds VZW held through HSBC Global Custody Nominees (UK) Limited 223,015 ordinary shares (8.02 per cent. of total voting rights).
During the year the group made charitable donations totalling £14,638 (2010: £8,548). Of this amount £13,218 was paid to arts, sports and education related charities and £1,420 was paid to local hospitals and health related charities.
It is group policy to keep employees informed, through internal publications and other communications, on the performance of the group and on matters affecting them as employees and arrangements to that end are made by the management of individual subsidiary undertakings.
It is also group policy that proper consideration is given to applications for employment received from disabled persons and to give employees who become disabled every opportunity to continue their employment.
It is group policy to agree payment terms with suppliers when negotiating business transactions and to pay suppliers in accordance with contractual or other legal obligations. The company has no trade creditors. Group trade creditors at 31 December 2011 represented 40 days (2010: 39 days) of annual purchases.
The company's share capital comprises one class of ordinary shares of 10 pence each which carry no restrictions on the transfer of shares or on voting rights (other than as set out in the company's articles of association). There are no agreements known to the company between shareholders in the company which may result in restrictions on the transfer of shares or on voting rights in relation to the company. Details of the issued share capital are contained in note 31 to the accounts.
At the annual general meeting in 2011, shareholders gave authority for the company to purchase up to 277,950 of its own shares. This authority expires at the conclusion of this year's annual general meeting on 7 June 2012.
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP has expressed its willingness to continue as auditors of the company and a resolution proposing PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP re-appointment will be put to the annual general meeting.
Each of the persons who were directors at the time when this directors' report was approved has confirmed that:
After reviewing the group's budget for 2012 and other forecasts, the directors have a reasonable expectation that the group has adequate resources to continue in operational existence for the foreseeable future. Therefore they continue to adopt the going concern basis in preparing the accounts.
By order of the board
J A Morton Secretary 26 April 2012
This statement describes how the company applies the main principles of UK Corporate Governance Code 2010 ("the Code"). In implementing the Code, the directors have taken account of the company's size and structure and the fact that there is a controlling shareholder.
The company has complied with the relevant provisions set out in the Code throughout the year with the exception of the following areas of the Code that have not been implemented:
The board currently comprises eight directors. Four are non-executive directors, of which two are considered independent. The remaining directors are executive directors, including the executive chairman. Mr Relleen, the deputy chairman, has been designated as the senior independent director. The names and brief biographical details of each director appears on page 7.
Mr Vaughan-Johnson and Mr Reeves were first appointed to the board in 1999 and 2001 respectively. The board, having taken into consideration provision B.1.1 of the Code, considers it is in the best interest of the company for Mr Vaughan-Johnson and Mr Reeves to continue to act as non-executive directors. The board considers that they remain independent and that given the relative complexity and geographical spread of the group, their experience continues to be of considerable benefit.
There is on-going dialogue between the chairman and the majority shareholder whose views are reported to the board. The company is also in contact with other significant shareholders.
The board has established a nomination committee chaired by Mr Perkins, the other members being Mr Relleen and Mr Vaughan-Johnson.
The board has established a remuneration committee, audit committee and executive committee. Terms of reference of each of these committees can be viewed on the company's website.
The board undertook a performance evaluation during the year by way of an internal review.
The board is responsible for managing the group's business and has adopted a schedule of matters reserved for its approval. The schedule will be reviewed annually and covers, inter alia, the following areas:
A full copy of the schedule is available on the company's website.
A report summarising the group's financial and operational performance including detailed information on each of its businesses is sent to directors each month. Each director is provided with sufficient information in advance of board meetings to enable the directors to make informed judgements on matters referred to the board. The board met nine times in 2011.
Attendance by directors at board and committee meetings held during the year was as follows:
| Board | Audit | Remuneration | |
|---|---|---|---|
| M C Perkins | 9/9 | – | – |
| C J Relleen | 9/9 | 3/3 | 2/2 |
| C J Ames | 9/9 | – | – |
| M Dünki | 7/9 | – | – |
| P J Field | 9/9 | – | – |
| A K Mathur | 9/9 | 3/3(i) | – |
| D A Reeves | 9/9 | 3/3 | – |
| C P T Vaughan-Johnson | 8/9 | 3/3 | 2/2 |
(i) Mr Mathur attends meetings of the audit committee by invitation in his capacity as finance director.
The board has delegated the day to day management of the group's operations to the executive committee which is also responsible for implementing board policy. The members of the committee are:
| Chairman |
|---|
| Finance |
| Joint managing director |
| Joint managing director |
| Bangladesh |
| Kenya, Malawi and South Africa |
| India |
| Company secretary |
(i) appointed to the executive committee with effect from 1 January 2012.
The audit committee is chaired by Mr Relleen. The other members of the committee are Mr Reeves and Mr Vaughan-Johnson. During 2011, the committee met on three occasions.
The principal responsibilities of the audit committee are:
During the year the committee's work included discharging these responsibilities and, in addition, it reviewed its terms of reference taking into account the Guidance on Audit Committees issued by the Financial Reporting Council.
The committee reviewed those non-audit services provided by the external auditor and satisfied itself that the scale and nature of those services were such that the auditors' objectivity and independence were safeguarded.
The committee comprises the board's two independent non-executive directors, being Mr Vaughan-Johnson who is chairman of the committee and Mr Relleen.
The committee's full terms of reference are available on the company's website. The responsibilities of the committee include:
The committee met twice during 2011. The remuneration report appears on pages 18 to 20.
The company purchases insurance to cover its directors in respect of legal actions against them in their capacity as directors of the company. The level of cover is currently £20 million. All directors have access to independent professional advice at the company's expense.
The share capital of the group is set out on page 12 of the report of the directors.
The directors acknowledge that they are responsible for maintaining a sound system of internal control. During the year, the audit committee, on behalf of the board, reviewed the effectiveness of the framework of the group's system of internal control, the principal features of which are described below.
Decentralisation is a key management philosophy with responsibility for efficient day to day operations delegated to local management. Accountability and delegation of authority are clearly defined with regular communication between group head office and local management. The performance of each company is continually monitored centrally including a critical review of annual budgets, revised forecasts and monthly sales, profits and cash reports. Financial results and key business statistics and variances from approved plans are carefully monitored. Senior management regularly visit and review the group's operating units. However, any system of internal control can provide only reasonable, and not absolute, assurance against material mis-statement or loss.
By order of the board
J A Morton Secretary
26 April 2012
The directors are responsible for preparing the annual report, the directors' remuneration report and the financial statements in accordance with applicable law and regulations.
Company law requires the directors to prepare group and parent company financial statements for each financial year. Under that law the directors have prepared the group and parent company financial statements in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRSs) as adopted by the European Union.
Under company law the directors must not approve the financial statements unless they are satisfied that they give a true and fair view of the state of affairs of both the group and the parent company and of the profit or loss of the group and company for that period.
In preparing these financial statements, the directors are required to:
The directors are responsible for keeping adequate accounting records that are sufficient to show and explain the company's transactions and disclose with reasonable accuracy at any time the financial position of the company and the group and enable them to ensure that the financial statements and the Directors' Remuneration Report comply with the Companies Act 2006 and, as regards the group financial statements, Article 4 of the IAS Regulation. They are also responsible for safeguarding the assets of the company and the group and hence for taking reasonable steps for the prevention and detection of fraud and other irregularities.
Each of the directors, whose names and functions are listed on page 2 confirm that, to the best of their knowledge:
The directors are responsible for the maintenance and integrity of the corporate and financial information included on the company's website.
By order of the board
M C Perkins Chairman 26 April 2012
This report is drawn up in accordance with the Companies Act 2006 and the rules of the UK Listing Authority.
In determining remuneration policy and the remuneration of directors, full consideration has been given to the relevant provisions of the UK Corporate Governance Code 2010. The board seeks to provide remuneration packages that will attract, retain and motivate the best possible person for each position. The board also wishes to align the interests of executives with shareholders. The group's activities are based largely on agriculture and horticulture, which are highly dependent on factors outside management control (e.g. weather, market prices for our produce etc.), and is a significant consideration as to why the company does not operate profit related bonus, share option or share incentive schemes for directors.
Messrs Perkins, Ames, Field and Mathur are each employed on rolling service contracts. Mr Perkins's service contract is dated 25 April 2002, Mr Mathur's service contract is dated 1 December 2003, Mr Ames's service contract is dated 24 April 2009 and Mr Field's service contract is dated 19 December 2011. The service contracts are terminable at any time by a one year period of notice from the company or the director. Following their initial appointment non-executive directors may seek re-election by shareholders at each subsequent annual general meeting. Non-executive directors do not have service agreements. There are no specific contractual provisions for compensation upon early termination of a non-executive director's employment. The remuneration committee reviews salaries annually and will seek independent professional advice when appropriate.
The following sections on directors' remuneration and pensions have been audited.
| Basic | Benefits | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| remuneration | in kind | Total | Total | |
| 2011 | 2011 | 2011 | 2010 | |
| £ | £ | £ | £ | |
| Executive | ||||
| M C Perkins | 395,000 | 53,526 | 448,526 | 420,226 |
| C J Ames | 220,000 | 25,022 | 245,022 | 235,439 |
| P J Field | 220,000 | 24,522 | 244,522 | 211,260 |
| A K Mathur | 206,060 | 53,610 | 259,670 | 230,847 |
| Non-executive | ||||
| M Dünki | 30,000 | – | 30,000 | 7,500 |
| D A Reeves | 30,000 | – | 30,000 | 20,000 |
| C J Relleen | 47,500 | – | 47,500 | 37,500 |
| Dr B A Siegfried (up until 3 June 2010) | – | – | – | 5,000 |
| C P T Vaughan-Johnson | 36,705 ––––––––––– |
– ––––––––––– |
36,705 ––––––––––– |
32,500 ––––––––––– |
| 1,185,265 ––––––––––– |
156,680 ––––––––––– |
1,341,945 ––––––––––– |
1,200,272 ––––––––––– |
|
Benefits in kind include the value attributed to benefits such as medical insurance, permanent health insurance, spouse/partner travel and cash alternatives to company cars.
Most UK employees, including executive directors, are eligible to join pension schemes operated within the group. Mr Perkins was a member of The Linton Park Group Pension Scheme up until 28 February 2010. Mr Field and Mr Mathur are members of The Linton Park Pension Scheme (2011). This Pension Scheme was formerly the Unochrome Group Pension Scheme and was merged with the Linton Park Pension Scheme and the Lawrie Group Pension Scheme on 1 July 2011. Pension accrues at the rate of 1/60th up to 30 June 2011 and 1/80th thereafter of basic final salary per year of service for Messrs Field and Mathur. Formerly under The Linton Park Group Pension Scheme the normal retirement age was 63 up until 31 December 2003 in respect of service up until that date. With effect from 1 January 2004 the normal retirement age was increased to 65.
From 1 May 2007 the normal retirement age of members of The Lawrie Group Pension Scheme was increased to 65. Pension benefits accrued prior to that date can be paid at age 63 without actuarial reduction. In a few cases pensions can be paid from age 60 without actuarial reduction. The Linton Park Pension Scheme (2011) provides for a lump sum death in service benefit of four times basic salary and a spouse's pension of half of the member's pension, based on prospective service.
All benefits are subject to HM Revenue and Customs limits. Up until 6 April 2005, under The Linton Park Group Pension Scheme, post retirement pension increases were based on the annual increase in the retail price index, subject to a maximum of 5 per cent. From 6 April 2005, the maximum increase reduced to 2.5 per cent. per annum in respect of pension accrued on or after that date. Also, under The Linton Park Group Pension Scheme there is a minimum increase of 3 per cent. per annum in respect of service before 1 January 2002. Under The Lawrie Group Pension Scheme for entrants prior to 1 January 1996, pension earned prior to April 2003 is subject to a 5 per cent. increase per annum. From 1 May 2007, the maximum increase reduced to 2.5 per cent. in respect of pension accrual on or after that date.
A sum of £39,208 was paid to Mr Ames's personal pension arrangement during the year.
Further information on pension arrangements:
Defined benefit pension schemes
| Transfer | Transfer | Transfer | Increase | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| value of | value of | value of | in transfer | |||||
| Pension | Pension | pension | pension | pension | value in the | |||
| Pension | accrued in | accrued to | accrued in | accrued | accrued | year net of | ||
| accrued in | the year net | 31 Dec | the year net | at 31 Dec | at 31 Dec | directors' | ||
| year | of inflation | 2011 | of inflation | 2010 | 2011 | contributions | ||
| Age | £ | £ | £ | £ | £ | £ | £ | |
| P J Field | 61 | 11,457 | 7,895 | 79,957 | 175,684 | 1,907,100 | 2,065,539 | 152,941 |
| A K Mathur | 64 | 8,920 | 4,739 | 89,330 | 102,566 | 2,088,400 | 2,448,148 | 354,669 |
The increase in transfer value and the transfer value of pension accrued in the year are stated net of directors' contributions.
Notes:
In addition to the above, an unfunded pension of US\$200,000 per annum is paid to Mr G Fox, a former director of the company.
The following graph shows the total return on an investment in the company's shares over the 5 years ended 31 December 2011 compared with the return achieved by the FTSE SmallCap index. This index has been selected as there is no specific index that is comparable to the activities of the company.
By order of the board
J A Morton Secretary 26 April 2012
for the year ended 31 December 2011
| 2011 | 2010 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Notes | £'000 | £'000 | |
| Revenue | 2 | 246,849 | 251,181 |
| Cost of sales | (155,806) | (150,340) | |
| Gross profit | ––––––––––– 91,043 |
––––––––––– 100,841 |
|
| Other operating income | 1,755 | 2,416 | |
| Distribution costs | (12,972) | (12,192) | |
| Administrative expenses | (40,593) | (42,681) | |
| Trading profit | 3 | ––––––––––– 39,233 |
––––––––––– 48,384 |
| Share of associates' results | 4 | 6,862 | 3,814 |
| Profit on disposal of non-current assets | 5 | 534 | 4,144 |
| Profit on disposal of available-for-sale investments | 178 | 182 | |
| (Loss)/profit on transfer/disposal of an associate | 6 | (721) | 248 |
| Gain arising from changes in fair value of biological assets | 16 | 7,320 | 11,111 |
| Profit from operations | ––––––––––– 53,406 |
––––––––––– 67,883 |
|
| Investment income | 1,074 | 957 | |
| Finance income | 7 | 2,350 | 1,431 |
| Finance costs | 7 | (632) | (661) |
| Net exchange gain | 7 | 1,648 | 4,054 |
| Pension schemes' net financing income/(expense) | 7 | 804 | (523) |
| Net finance income | 7 | 4,170 ––––––––––– |
4,301 ––––––––––– |
| Profit before tax | 58,650 | 73,141 | |
| Taxation | 8 | (16,860) | (22,107) |
| Profit for the year | ––––––––––– 41,790 ––––––––––– |
––––––––––– 51,034 ––––––––––– |
|
| Profit attributable to: | |||
| Owners of the parent | 33,086 | 41,984 | |
| Non-controlling interests | 8,704 | 9,050 | |
| ––––––––––– 41,790 ––––––––––– |
––––––––––– 51,034 ––––––––––– |
||
| Earnings per share – basic and diluted | 11 | 1,190.4p | 1,510.5p |
for the year ended 31 December 2011
| 2011 | 2010 | |
|---|---|---|
| £'000 | £'000 | |
| Group Profit for the year |
41,790 ––––––––––– |
51,034 ––––––––––– |
| Other comprehensive (expense)/income: | ||
| Foreign exchange translation differences | (20,383) | 8,448 |
| Release of exchange translation difference on transfer/disposal of associate | (429) | (17,298) |
| Release of other reserves movements on transfer/disposal of associate | 219 | 945 |
| Actuarial movement on defined benefit pension schemes (note 30) | (15,609) | 5,457 |
| Available-for-sale investments: | ||
| Valuation (losses)/gains taken to equity | (2,201) | 385 |
| Transferred to income statement on sale | 2 | – |
| Share of other comprehensive (expense)/income of associates | (2,446) | 8 |
| Tax relating to components of other comprehensive income | 21 ––––––––––– |
889 ––––––––––– |
| Other comprehensive expense for the year, net of tax | (40,826) | (1,166) |
| Total comprehensive income for the year | ––––––––––– 964 ––––––––––– |
––––––––––– 49,868 ––––––––––– |
| Total comprehensive (expense)/income attributable to: | ||
| Owners of the parent | (4,861) | 40,887 |
| Non-controlling interests | 5,825 | 8,981 |
| ––––––––––– 964 ––––––––––– |
––––––––––– 49,868 ––––––––––– |
|
| Company | ||
| Profit for the year | 3,514 ––––––––––– |
2,976 ––––––––––– |
| Other comprehensive expense: | ||
| Available-for-sale investments: | ||
| Transferred to profit or loss on sale | – | (7) |
| Other comprehensive expense for the year, net of tax | ––––––––––– – |
––––––––––– (7) |
| Total comprehensive income for the year | ––––––––––– 3,514 ––––––––––– |
––––––––––– 2,969 ––––––––––– |
at 31 December 2011
| 2011 | 2010 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Notes | £'000 | £'000 | |
| Non-current assets | |||
| Intangible assets | 14 | 7,643 | 8,076 |
| Property, plant and equipment | 15 | 94,575 | 88,676 |
| Biological assets Prepaid operating leases |
16 17 |
118,180 992 |
121,000 1,040 |
| Investments in associates | 19 | 38,077 | 31,778 |
| Deferred tax assets | 29 | 158 | 109 |
| Financial assets | 20 | 28,545 | 25,184 |
| Other investments | 21 | 8,368 | 7,362 |
| Retirement benefit surplus | 30 | 437 | 835 |
| Trade and other receivables | 23 | 13,903 ––––––––––– |
17,758 ––––––––––– |
| Total non-current assets | 310,878 ––––––––––– |
301,818 ––––––––––– |
|
| Current assets | |||
| Inventories | 22 | 39,177 | 35,214 |
| Trade and other receivables | 23 | 62,872 | 60,388 |
| Financial assets Current income tax assets |
20 | 5,829 690 |
5,313 |
| Cash and cash equivalents | 24 | 260,916 | 650 291,149 |
| ––––––––––– 369,484 |
––––––––––– 392,714 |
||
| Assets classified as held for sale | 25 | – | 6,161 |
| Total current assets | ––––––––––– 369,484 |
––––––––––– 398,875 |
|
| Current liabilities | ––––––––––– | ––––––––––– | |
| Borrowings | 27 | (7,310) | (5,990) |
| Trade and other payables | 26 | (236,621) | (260,751) |
| Current income tax liabilities | (3,242) | (7,211) | |
| Employee benefit obligations | 30 | (374) | (352) |
| Provisions | 28 | (214) ––––––––––– |
(1,113) ––––––––––– |
| Total current liabilities | (247,761) ––––––––––– |
(275,417) ––––––––––– |
|
| Net current assets | 121,723 ––––––––––– |
123,458 ––––––––––– |
|
| Total assets less current liabilities | 432,601 ––––––––––– |
425,276 ––––––––––– |
|
| Non-current liabilities | |||
| Borrowings | 27 | (181) | (442) |
| Trade and other payables | 26 | (7,652) | (9,644) |
| Deferred tax liabilities | 29 | (35,395) | (34,502) |
| Employee benefit obligations Other non-current liabilities |
30 | (26,955) (111) |
(12,852) (114) |
| Provisions | 28 | (600) | (750) |
| Total non-current liabilities | ––––––––––– (70,894) |
––––––––––– (58,304) |
|
| Net assets | ––––––––––– 361,707 |
––––––––––– 366,972 |
|
| ––––––––––– | ––––––––––– | ||
| Equity Called up share capital |
31 | 284 | 284 |
| Share premium | 15,298 | 15,298 | |
| Reserves | 306,010 | 313,911 | |
| Total shareholders' funds | ––––––––––– 321,592 |
––––––––––– 329,493 |
|
| Non-controlling interests | 40,115 | 37,479 | |
| Total equity | ––––––––––– 361,707 |
––––––––––– 366,972 |
|
| ––––––––––– | ––––––––––– |
at 31 December 2011
| 2011 | 2010 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Notes | £'000 | £'000 | |
| Non-current assets | |||
| Investments in subsidiaries | 18 | 73,508 | 73,508 |
| Financial assets | 20 | 170 | 170 |
| Other investments | 21 | 8,373 ––––––––––– |
7,367 ––––––––––– |
| Total non-current assets | 82,051 ––––––––––– |
81,045 ––––––––––– |
|
| Current assets | |||
| Amounts due from group undertakings | 5,258 | 8,742 | |
| Current income tax asset | 74 | 74 | |
| Cash and cash equivalents | 24 | 6,323 ––––––––––– |
– ––––––––––– |
| Total current assets | 11,655 ––––––––––– |
8,816 ––––––––––– |
|
| Current liabilities | |||
| Trade and other payables | 26 | (149) | (17) |
| Amounts due to group undertakings | (27,514) ––––––––––– |
(24,177) ––––––––––– |
|
| Total current liabilities | (27,663) ––––––––––– |
(24,194) ––––––––––– |
|
| Net current liabilities | (16,008) ––––––––––– |
(15,378) ––––––––––– |
|
| Total assets less current liabilities | 66,043 ––––––––––– |
65,667 ––––––––––– |
|
| Non-current liabilities | |||
| Deferred tax liabilities | 29 | (301) ––––––––––– |
(313) ––––––––––– |
| Total non-current liabilities | (301) ––––––––––– |
(313) ––––––––––– |
|
| Net assets | 65,742 ––––––––––– |
65,354 ––––––––––– |
|
| Equity | |||
| Called up share capital | 31 | 284 | 284 |
| Share premium | 15,298 | 15,298 | |
| Reserves | 50,160 ––––––––––– |
49,772 ––––––––––– |
|
| Total shareholders' funds | 65,742 ––––––––––– |
65,354 ––––––––––– |
|
The notes on pages 28 to 71 form part of the financial statements.
The financial statements were approved on 26 April 2012 by the board of directors and signed on their behalf by:
Chairman
Registered Number 29559
for the year ended 31 December 2011
| 2011 | 2010 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Notes | £'000 | £'000 | |
| Cash generated from operations | |||
| Cash flows from operating activities | 32 | 44,275 | 30,586 |
| Interest paid | (625) | (683) | |
| Income taxes paid | (16,133) | (15,532) | |
| Interest received | 2,257 | 1,291 | |
| Dividends received from associates | 1,221 ––––––––––– |
1,220 ––––––––––– |
|
| Net cash flow from operating activities | 30,995 | 16,882 | |
| Cash flows from investing activities | |||
| Purchase of intangible assets | (89) | (91) | |
| Purchase of property, plant and equipment | (20,790) | (16,486) | |
| Insurance proceeds for non-current assets | 534 | 5,490 | |
| Proceeds from sale of non-current assets | 530 | 553 | |
| Biological asset – new planting | (2,525) | (2,591) | |
| Part disposal of a subsidiary | 210 | 507 | |
| Purchase of non-controlling interests | – | (2,705) | |
| Non-controlling interest subscription | 67 | – | |
| Proceeds from sale of associate | – | 48,754 | |
| Proceeds from sale of investments | 5,662 | 12,785 | |
| Purchase of investments | (11,168) | (7,181) | |
| Income from investments | 1,074 ––––––––––– |
957 ––––––––––– |
|
| Net cash flow from investing activities | (26,495) | 39,992 | |
| Cash flows from financing activities | |||
| Equity dividends paid | (3,057) | (2,891) | |
| Dividends paid to non-controlling interests | (3,421) | (4,207) | |
| New loans | 168 | 59 | |
| Loans repaid | (138) | (6,862) | |
| Financial lease payments | (490) ––––––––––– |
(713) ––––––––––– |
|
| Net cash flow from financing activities | (6,938) ––––––––––– |
(14,614) ––––––––––– |
|
| Net (decrease)/increase in cash and cash equivalents | (2,438) | 42,260 | |
| Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year | 24 | 75,273 | 28,631 |
| Exchange (losses)/gains on cash | (209) ––––––––––– |
4,382 ––––––––––– |
|
| Cash and cash equivalents at end of year | 24 | 72,626 ––––––––––– |
75,273 ––––––––––– |
For the purposes of the cash flow statement, cash and cash equivalents are included net of overdrafts repayable on demand. These overdrafts are excluded from the definition of cash and cash equivalents disclosed on the balance sheet.
for the year ended 31 December 2011
| 2011 | 2010 | |
|---|---|---|
| Note | £'000 | £'000 |
| Cash generated from operations | ||
| Profit before tax | 3,502 | 2,952 |
| Adjustments for: | ||
| Gain on disposal of investments | (2) | (117) |
| Interest income | (343) | (336) |
| Exchange gain on cash | (26) | – |
| Dividends from group companies | (5,000) | (4,000) |
| Increase/(decrease) in trade and other payables | 132 | (1) |
| Net movement in intra-group balances | 6,821 ––––––––––– |
(138) ––––––––––– |
| Cash used in operations | 5,084 | (1,640) |
| Interest received | 343 ––––––––––– |
336 ––––––––––– |
| Net cash flow from operating activities | 5,427 | (1,304) |
| Cash flows from investing activities | ||
| Proceeds from sale of investments | 5 | 586 |
| Purchase of investments | (1,009) | (326) |
| Dividends received | 5,000 ––––––––––– |
4,000 ––––––––––– |
| Net cash flow from investing activities | 3,996 | 4,260 |
| Cash flows from financing activities | ||
| Equity dividends paid | (3,126) ––––––––––– |
(2,956) ––––––––––– |
| Net cash flow from financing activities | (3,126) ––––––––––– |
(2,956) ––––––––––– |
| Net movement in cash and cash equivalents | 6,297 | – |
| Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year | – | – |
| Exchange gain on cash | 26 ––––––––––– |
– ––––––––––– |
| 24 Cash and cash equivalents at end of year |
6,323 ––––––––––– |
– ––––––––––– |
for the year ended 31 December 2011
| Non | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Share | Share | Treasury | Retained | Other | controlling | Total | ||
| capital premium | shares | earnings | reserves | Total | interests | equity | ||
| £'000 | £'000 | £'000 | £'000 | £'000 | £'000 | £'000 | £'000 | |
| Group | ||||||||
| At 1 January 2010 | 284 | 15,298 | (400) 208,044 | 70,628 293,854 | 32,456 326,310 | |||
| Total comprehensive income/(expense) for the year | – | – | – | 49,733 | (8,846) | 40,887 | 8,981 | 49,868 |
| Dividends | – | – | – | (2,891) | – | (2,891) | (4,207) | (7,098) |
| Non-controlling interest subscription | – | – | – | – | – | – | 497 | 497 |
| Acquisition of non-controlling interests | – | – | – | (2,457) | – | (2,457) | (248) | (2,705) |
| Share of associates' other equity movements | – | – | – | 199 | – | 199 | – | 199 |
| Loss on dilution of interest in associate | – | – ––––––– ––––––– ––––––– ––––––– ––––––– ––––––– ––––––– ––––––– |
– | (99) | – | (99) | – | (99) |
| At 31 December 2010 | 284 | 15,298 | (400) 252,529 | 61,782 329,493 | 37,479 366,972 | |||
| Total comprehensive income/(expense) for the year | – | – | – | 15,170 | (20,031) | (4,861) | 5,825 | 964 |
| Dividends | – | – | – | (3,057) | – | (3,057) | (3,421) | (6,478) |
| Non-controlling interest subscription | – | – | – | 46 | – | 46 | 232 | 278 |
| Share of associate's other equity movements | – | – | – | 22 | – | 22 | – | 22 |
| Loss on dilution of interest in associate | – | – ––––––– ––––––– ––––––– ––––––– ––––––– ––––––– ––––––– ––––––– |
– | (51) | – | (51) | – | (51) |
| At 31 December 2011 | 284 | 15,298 ––––––– ––––––– ––––––– ––––––– ––––––– ––––––– ––––––– ––––––– |
(400) 264,659 | 41,751 | 321,592 | 40,115 361,707 | ||
| Company | ||||||||
| At 1 January 2010 | 284 | 15,298 | – | 37,627 | 12,132 | 65,341 | – | 65,341 |
| Total comprehensive income for the year | – | – | – | 2,969 | – | 2,969 | – | 2,969 |
| Dividends | – | – ––––––– ––––––– ––––––– ––––––– ––––––– ––––––– ––––––– ––––––– |
– | (2,956) | – | (2,956) | – | (2,956) |
| At 31 December 2010 | 284 | 15,298 | – | 37,640 | 12,132 | 65,354 | – | 65,354 |
| Total comprehensive income for the year | – | – | – | 3,514 | – | 3,514 | – | 3,514 |
| Dividends | – | – | – | (3,126) | – | (3,126) | – | (3,126) |
| At 31 December 2011 | 284 | ––––––– ––––––– ––––––– ––––––– ––––––– ––––––– ––––––– ––––––– 15,298 |
– | 38,028 | 12,132 | 65,742 | – | 65,742 |
| ––––––– ––––––– ––––––– ––––––– ––––––– ––––––– ––––––– ––––––– |
Other reserves of the group and company includes a £31,000 (2010: £31,000) capital redemption reserve and, in respect of the group, net exchange differences of £984,000 surplus (2010: £18,408,000 surplus).
Group retained earnings includes £116,745,000 (2010: £115,730,000) which would require exchange control permission for remittance as dividends.
The principal accounting policies applied in the preparation of these financial statements are set out below. These policies have been consistently applied to all years presented, unless otherwise stated.
The consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) as adopted by the EU, IFRIC interpretations and the Companies Act 2006 applicable to companies reporting under IFRS.
The consolidated financial statements have been prepared on the historical cost basis as modified by the revaluation of biological assets, available-for-sale investments, financial assets and financial liabilities held-for-trading.
Where necessary, comparative figures have been adjusted to conform with changes in presentation in the current year.
The directors have, at the time of approving the financial statements, a reasonable expectation that the company and the group have adequate resources to continue to operate for the foreseeable future. They therefore continue to adopt the going concern basis of accounting in preparing the financial statements.
The consolidated financial statements incorporate the financial statements of the company and entities controlled by the company (its subsidiaries) made up to 31 December each year.
On acquisition, the assets and liabilities of a subsidiary are measured at their fair values at the date of acquisition. Any excess of the cost of acquisition over the fair values of the identifiable net assets acquired is recognised as goodwill. Any deficiency of the cost of acquisition below the fair values of the identifiable net assets acquired (i.e. discount on acquisition) is credited to the income statement in the period of acquisition. The interest of minority shareholders is stated at the minority's proportion of the fair values of the assets and liabilities recognised.
The results of subsidiaries acquired or disposed of during the year are included in the consolidated income statement from the effective date of acquisition or disposal, as appropriate.
Where necessary, adjustments are made to the financial statements of subsidiaries to bring the accounting policies used into line with those used by the group.
All intra-group transactions, balances, income and expenses are eliminated on consolidation.
An associate is an entity over which the group is in a position to exercise significant influence, but not control or joint control, through participation in the financial and operating policy decisions of that entity.
Investments in associates are accounted for by the equity method of accounting. Under this method the group's share of the post-acquisition profits or losses of associates is recognised in the income statement and its share of post-acquisition movements in reserves is recognised in reserves.
Transactions in currencies other than pounds sterling are recorded at the rates of exchange prevailing on the dates of the transactions. At each balance sheet date, monetary assets and liabilities that are denominated in foreign currencies are retranslated at the rates prevailing on the balance sheet date. Translation differences on non-monetary items carried at fair value are reported as part of the fair value gain or loss. Gains and losses arising on retranslation are included in the income statement, except for exchange differences arising on non-monetary items where the changes in fair value are recognised directly in equity.
The consolidated financial statements are presented in sterling which is the company's functional and presentation currency. On consolidation, income statements and cash flows of foreign entities are translated into pounds sterling at average exchange rates for the year and their balance sheets are translated at the exchange rates ruling at the balance sheet date. Exchange differences arising from the translation of the net investment in foreign entities and of borrowings designated as hedges of such investments, are taken to equity. When a foreign entity is sold such exchange differences arising since 1 January 2004 are recognised in the income statement as part of the gain or loss on disposal.
Goodwill and fair value adjustments arising on the acquisition of a foreign entity are treated as assets and liabilities of the foreign entity and translated at the exchange rate ruling on the date of acquisition. The group has elected to treat goodwill and fair value adjustments arising on acquisitions prior to 1 January 2004, the date of the group's transition from UK GAAP to IFRS, as sterling denominated assets and liabilities.
Revenue is measured at the fair value of the consideration received or receivable and represents amounts receivable for goods and services provided in the normal course of business, net of discounts, value added tax and other sales related taxes and after eliminating intra-group sales.
Interest income and expense arising through the group's banking operations are recognised in the income statement for all instruments measured at amortised cost using the effective interest method and is stated net of interest paid.
The effective interest method is a method of calculating the amortised cost of a financial asset or a financial liability and of allocating the interest income or interest expense over the relevant period. The effective interest rate is the rate that exactly discounts estimated future cash payments or receipts through the expected life of the financial instrument or, when appropriate, a shorter period to the net carrying amount of the financial asset or financial liability. When calculating the effective interest rate, the group estimates cash flows considering all contractual terms of the financial instrument (for example, prepayment options) but does not consider future credit losses. The calculation includes all fees and points paid or received between parties to the contract that are an integral part of the effective interest rate, transaction costs and all other premiums or discounts. Once a financial asset or a group of similar financial assets has been written down as a result of an impairment loss, interest income is recognised using the rate of interest used to discount the future cash flows for the purpose of measuring the impairment loss.
Fees and commissions are for portfolio and other management advisory services and are recognised based on the applicable service contracts, usually on a time-apportioned basis.
In respect of engineering services, revenue is recognised based upon the stage of completion and includes costs incurred to date, plus accrued profits.
Invoices are raised when goods are despatched or when the risks and rewards of ownership otherwise irrevocably pass to the customer.
IFRS 8 requires operating segments to be identified on the basis of internal reports used to assess performance and allocate resources by the chief operating decision maker. The chief operating decision maker has been identified as the Executive Committee led by the Chairman. Inter segment sales are not significant.
Exceptional items are those significant items which are separately disclosed by virtue of their size or incidence to enable a full understanding of the group's financial performance. Full disclosure of exceptional items are set out in notes 5 and 6.
Goodwill arising on consolidation represents the excess of the cost of acquisition over the group's interest in the fair value of the identifiable assets and liabilities of a subsidiary or associate at the date of acquisition.
Goodwill is recognised as an asset and reviewed for impairment at least annually. Any impairment is recognised immediately in the income statement and is not subsequently reversed.
On disposal of a subsidiary or associate, the attributable amount of goodwill is included in the determination of the profit or loss on disposal.
Identifiable intangible assets include customer relationships and other intangible assets acquired on the acquisition of subsidiaries. Acquired intangible assets with finite lives are amortised on a straight-line basis over their estimated useful lives, not exceeding 20 years. Intangible assets' estimated lives are re-evaluated annually and an impairment test is carried out if certain indicators of impairment exist.
Acquired computer software licences are capitalised on the basis of the costs incurred to acquire and bring to use the specific software. Computer software licences are held at cost and are amortised on a straight-line basis over 3 to 7 years.
Costs associated with developing or maintaining computer software programmes are recognised as an expense as incurred. Costs that are directly associated with identifiable and unique software products controlled by the group and which are expected to generate economic benefits exceeding costs beyond one year, are recognised as an intangible asset and amortised over their estimated useful lives.
Land and buildings comprises mainly factories and offices. All property, plant and equipment is shown at cost less subsequent depreciation and impairment, except for land, which is shown at cost less impairment. Cost includes expenditure that is directly attributable to the acquisition of these assets.
On transition to IFRS, the group followed the transitional provisions and elected that previous UK GAAP revaluations be treated as deemed cost.
Subsequent costs are included in the assets' carrying amount, only when it is probable that future economic benefits associated with the item will flow to the group and the cost of the item can be measured reliably. Repairs and maintenance are charged to the income statement during the financial period in which they are incurred.
No depreciation is provided on freehold land. Depreciation of other fixed assets is calculated to write off their cost less residual value over their expected useful lives.
The rates of depreciation used for the other assets are as follows:-
| Freehold and long leasehold buildings | nil to 10 per cent. per annum |
|---|---|
| Other short leasehold land and buildings | unexpired term of the lease |
| Plant, machinery, fixtures, fittings and equipment | 4 to 33 per cent. per annum |
Assets held under finance leases are depreciated over their expected useful lives on the same basis as owned assets, or, where shorter, over the term of the relevant lease.
The assets' residual values and useful lives are reviewed, and adjusted if appropriate, at each balance sheet date.
The gain or loss arising on the disposal or retirement of an asset is determined as the difference between the sales proceeds and the carrying amount of the asset and is included in the income statement.
Biological assets are measured at each balance sheet date at fair value. Any changes in fair value are recognised in the income statement in the year in which they arise. The basis under which fair value is determined for the group's biological assets are described below:
Tea and rubber are generally valued at each year end by independent professional valuers. The valuations take into account assumptions about expected life span of plantings, yields, selling prices and sales of similar assets.
Costs of new areas planted are included as "new planting additions" in the biological assets note. Growing costs for tea and rubber are accounted for as a cost of inventory in the year in which they are incurred. The group does not recognise the fair value of harvested green leaf within cost of sales in the income statement. The increase in value is in effect offset against the fair value movement in biological assets.
Annually harvested horticultural assets such as edible nuts, citrus and avocados are generally valued on the basis of net present values of expected future cash flows from those assets, discounted at appropriate pre-tax rates and including certain assumptions about expected life span of the plantings, yields, selling prices, costs and discount rates. Growing costs incurred during the year are treated as "capitalised cultivation costs" in biological assets. As the crop is harvested and sold these accumulated costs are shown as "decrease due to harvesting" in biological assets and charged to cost of sales in the income statement.
Timber is valued on the basis of expected future cash flows from scheduled harvesting dates, discounted at appropriate pre-tax rates and including certain assumptions about expected life span, yields, selling prices, costs and discount rates. Growing costs incurred during the year are treated as "new planting additions" in biological assets. As the trees are harvested the value accumulated to date of harvest is treated as "decrease due to harvesting" and charged to cost of sales in the income statement.
Agricultural crops such as soya and maize are valued at estimated selling price less future anticipated costs. Growing costs incurred during the year are treated as "capitalised cultivation costs" in biological assets. As the crops are harvested the value accumulated to date of harvest is treated as "decrease due to harvesting" and charged to cost of sales in the income statement.
Assets that have an indefinite useful life are not subject to amortisation and are tested annually for impairment and whenever events or changes in circumstance indicate that the carrying amount may not be recoverable. Assets that are subject to amortisation are tested for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount may not be recoverable. An impairment loss is recognised for the amount by which the assets' carrying amount exceeds its recoverable amount. The recoverable amount is the higher of an assets' fair value less costs to sell and value in use. For the purposes of assessing impairment, assets are grouped at the lowest levels for which there are separately identifiable cash flows (cashgenerating units).
Investments are recognised and de-recognised on a trade date when a purchase or sale of an investment is under a contract whose terms require delivery of the investment within the timeframe established by the market concerned, and are initially measured at cost, including transaction costs.
Held-to-maturity investments are non-derivative financial assets with fixed or determinable payments and fixed maturities that the group's management has the positive intention and ability to hold to maturity. Were the group to sell other than an insignificant amount of held-to-maturity assets, the entire category would be tainted and reclassified as available-for-sale.
Available-for-sale financial assets include shares of listed and unlisted companies. Listed shares are measured at subsequent reporting dates at fair value. The fair values of listed shares are based on current bid values. Other investments such as shares of unlisted companies, documents, manuscripts and philately are measured at cost as fair value cannot be reliably measured.
Gains and losses arising from changes in fair value are recognised directly in equity, until the investment is disposed of or is determined to be impaired, at which time the cumulative gain or loss previously recognised in equity is included in the net profit or loss for the period.
Investments in subsidiary companies are included at cost plus incidental expenses less any provision for impairment. Impairment reviews are performed by the directors when there has been an indication of potential impairment.
Leases of property, plant and equipment where the group has substantially all the risks and rewards of ownership are classified as finance leases. Finance leases are capitalised at the inception of the lease at the lower of fair value and the estimated present value of the underlying lease payments. Each lease payment is allocated between the liability and finance charges so as to achieve a constant rate of interest on the finance balance outstanding. The corresponding rental obligations, net of finance charges, are included in liabilities. The interest element of the finance cost is charged to the income statement over the lease period. Property, plant and equipment acquired under finance leases is depreciated over the shorter of the asset's useful life and the lease term.
Leases where a significant portion of the risks and rewards of ownership are retained by the lessor are classified as operating leases. Payments made under operating leases are charged to the income statement on a straight-line basis over the period of the lease.
Agricultural produce included within inventory largely comprises stock of "black" tea. This is valued at the lower of cost and net realisable value. Cost includes the growing costs of 'green leaf' up to the date of harvest and factory costs incurred to bring the tea to its manufactured state.
In accordance with IAS 41, on initial recognition, agricultural produce is required to be measured at fair value less estimated point of sale costs. Given that there is no open market for green leaf, this is recognised in inventory at the lower of cost or net realisable value.
Other inventories are stated at the lower of cost and net realisable value. Cost comprises direct materials and, where applicable, direct labour costs and those overheads that have been incurred in bringing the inventories to their present location and condition. Cost is calculated using the weighted average method. Net realisable value represents the estimated selling price less all estimated costs of completion and selling expenses.
Trade receivables are carried at original invoice amount less provision made for impairment of these receivables. A provision for impairment of trade receivables is established when there is objective evidence that the group will not be able to collect all amounts due according to the original terms. The amount of the provision is recognised in the income statement.
Amounts due from customers of banking subsidiaries consist of loans and receivables which are non-derivative financial assets with fixed or determinable payments that are not quoted in an active market. They arise when the bank provides money, goods or services directly to a customer with no intention of trading the receivable and are carried at amortised cost using the effective interest method.
Cash and cash equivalents include cash in hand, deposits held at call with banks, other short-term highly liquid investments with original maturities of three months or less, and bank overdrafts. Bank overdrafts are shown within borrowings in current liabilities on the balance sheet. In respect of the group's banking operation, cash and cash equivalents include cash and nonrestricted balances with central banks, treasury bills and other eligible bills, loans and advances to banks, amounts due from other banks and short-term government securities.
Non-current assets classified as held for sale are measured at the lower of the carrying amount and fair value less costs to sell.
Non-current assets are classified as held for sale if their carrying amount will be recovered through a sale transaction rather than through continuing use. This condition is regarded as met only when the sale is highly probable and the asset is available for immediate sale in its present condition. Management must be committed to the sale which should be expected to qualify for recognition as a completed sale within one year from the date of classification.
Trade payables are obligations to pay for goods or services that have been acquired in the ordinary course of business from suppliers. Accounts payable are classified as current liabilities if payment is due within one year or less. If not, they are presented as non-current liabilities.
Trade payables are recognised initially at fair value and subsequently measured at amortised cost using the effective interest method.
Interest-bearing bank loans and overdrafts are initially recorded at the proceeds received, net of direct issue costs. Finance charges, including premiums payable on settlement or redemption and direct issue costs, are accounted for on an accrual basis to the income statement using the effective interest method and are added to the carrying amount of the instrument to the extent that they are not settled in the period in which they arise.
The tax expense represents the sum of the tax currently payable and deferred tax.
The tax currently payable is based on taxable profit for the year. Taxable profit differs from net profit as reported in the income statement because it excludes items of income or expense that are taxable or deductible in other years and it further excludes items that are never taxable or deductible. The group liability for current tax is calculated using tax rates that have been enacted or substantively enacted by the balance sheet date.
Deferred tax is the tax expected to be payable or recoverable on differences between the carrying amount of assets and liabilities in the financial statements and the corresponding tax bases used in the computation of taxable profit, and is accounted for using the liability method. Deferred tax is not accounted for if it arises from initial recognition of an asset or liability in a transaction, other than in a business combination, that at the time of the transaction affects neither accounting nor taxable profit or loss. Deferred tax is determined using tax rates and laws that have been enacted or substantively enacted by the balance sheet date and are expected to apply when the related tax asset is realised or the tax liability is settled.
Deferred tax assets are recognised to the extent that it is probable that future taxable profit will be available against which the temporary differences can be utilised.
Deferred tax is provided on temporary differences arising on investments in subsidiaries and associates, except where the timing of the reversal of the temporary difference is controlled by the group and it is probable that the temporary difference will not reverse in the foreseeable future.
Group companies operate various pension schemes. The schemes are funded through payments to insurance companies or trustee-administered funds. The group has both defined benefit and defined contribution plans.
A defined benefit plan is a pension plan that defines an amount of pension benefit that an employee will receive on retirement, usually dependent on one or more factors such as age, years of service and compensation. The pension cost for defined benefit schemes is assessed in accordance with the advice of qualified independent actuaries using the "projected unit" funding method.
A defined contribution plan is a pension plan under which the group pays fixed contributions into a separate fund. The group has no legal or constructive obligations to pay further contributions to the fund. Contributions are recognised as an expense in the income statement when they are due.
The liability recognised in the balance sheet in respect of defined benefit pension plans is the present value of the defined benefit obligation at the balance sheet date less the fair value of plan assets. Independent actuaries calculate the obligation annually using the "projected unit" funding method. Actuarial gains and losses are recognised in full in the period in which they occur, they are not recognised in the income statement and are presented in the statement of comprehensive income.
Some group companies have unfunded obligations to pay terminal gratuities to employees. Provisions are made for the estimated liability for gratuities as a result of services rendered by employees up to the balance sheet date and any movement in the provision is recognised in the income statement.
The estimated monetary liability for employees' accrued annual leave entitlement at the balance sheet date is recognised as an accrual.
Provisions are recognised when the group has a present obligation (legal or constructive) as a result of a past event, it is probable that an outflow of resources will be required to settle the obligation and the amount has been reliably estimated.
The provision for onerous lease commitments is based on the expected vacancy period.
Ordinary shares are classified as equity. Incremental costs directly attributable to the issue of new shares or options are shown in equity as a deduction, net of tax, from the proceeds.
Where any group company purchases the company's equity share capital (treasury shares), the consideration paid, including any directly attributable incremental costs (net of income taxes) is deducted from equity attributable to the company's equity holders until the shares are cancelled or reissued. Where such shares are subsequently reissued, any consideration received, net of any directly attributable incremental transaction costs and the related income tax effects, is included in equity attributable to the company's equity holders.
Estimates and judgements are continually evaluated and are based on historical experience and other factors, including expectations of future events that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances.
The group makes estimates and assumptions concerning the future. The resulting accounting will, by definition, seldom equal the actual results. The estimates and assumptions that have a significant risk of causing a material adjustment to the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities within the next financial year are set out below.
The group has significant investments in intangible assets, property, plant and equipment, biological assets, associated companies and other investments. These assets are tested for impairment when circumstances indicate there may be a potential impairment. Factors considered which could trigger an impairment review include the significant fall in market values, significant underperformance relative to historical or projected future operating results, a major change in market conditions or negative cash flows.
Depreciation and amortisation is based on management estimates of the future useful life of property, plant and equipment and intangible assets. Estimates may change due to technological developments, competition, changes in market conditions and other factors and may result in changes in the estimated useful life and in the depreciation and amortisation charges.
Biological assets are carried at fair value less estimated point-of-sale costs. Where meaningful market-determined prices do not exist to assess the fair value of biological assets, the fair value has been determined based on the net present value of expected future cash flows from those assets, discounted at appropriate pre-tax rates. In determining the fair value of biological assets where the discounting of expected future cash flows has been used, the directors have made certain assumptions about expected life-span of the plantings, yields, selling prices, costs and discount rates.
Pension accounting requires certain assumptions to be made in order to value obligations and to determine the impact on the income statement. These figures are particularly sensitive to assumptions for discount rates, mortality, inflation rates and expected long-term rates of return on assets. Details of assumptions made are given in note 30.
The group is subject to taxes in numerous jurisdictions. Significant judgement is required in determining worldwide provisions for taxes. There are many transactions and calculations during the ordinary course of business for which the ultimate tax determination is uncertain.
Customer relationships acquired are valued using discounted cash flow techniques and amortised over their estimated useful lives. In determining their value and their subsequent useful life, management are required to make assumptions in relation to expected cash flows, applicable discount factors, and client attrition rates.
| (i) | New and amended standards adopted by the group | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The group has adopted the following new and amended IFRSs as of 1 January 2011: | ||||||
| IAS 24 (revised) | Related party disclosures - effective from 1 January 2011 | |||||
| It supersedes IAS 24, 'Related party disclosures', issued in 2003. The revised standard clarifies and simplifies the definition of a related party and removes the requirement for government related entities to disclose details of all transactions with the government and other government-related entities and it clarifies and simplifies the definition of a related party. |
||||||
| IFRIC 14 (amendment) | Prepayments of a minimum funding requirement - effective from 1 January 2011 | |||||
| The amendments correct an unintended consequence of IFRIC 14, 'IAS 19 – The limit on a defined benefit asset, minimum funding requirements and their interaction'. Without the amendments, entities are not permitted to recognise as an asset some voluntary prepayments for minimum funding contributions. This was not intended when IFRIC 14 was issued, and the amendments correct this. |
||||||
| early by the group | (ii) Standards, amendments and interpretations to existing standards that are not yet effective and have not been adopted | |||||
| The following standards and amendments to existing standards have been published and are mandatory for the group's accounting periods beginning on or after 1 January 2012 or later periods, but the group has not adopted them early: |
||||||
| IFRS 9 | Financial instruments - effective from 1 January 2013 | |||||
| This standard is the first step in the process to replace IAS 39, 'Financial instruments: recognition and measurement'. IFRS 9 introduces new requirements for classifying and measuring financial assets and is likely to affect the group's accounting for its financial assets. The standard is not applicable until 1 January 2013 but is available for early adoption. This standard has not yet been endorsed by the EU. |
||||||
| IFRS 10 | Consolidated financial statements - effective from 1 January 2013 | |||||
| This standard builds on existing principles by identifying the concept of control as the determining factor in which an entity should be included within the consolidated financial statements. The standard provides additional guidance to assist in determining control where this is difficult to assess. This standard has not yet been endorsed by the EU. |
||||||
| IFRS 12 | Disclosures of interests in other entities - effective from 1 January 2013 | |||||
| This standard includes the disclosure requirements for all forms of interests in other entities, including joint arrangements, associates, structured entities and other off balance sheet vehicles. This standard has not yet been endorsed by the EU. |
||||||
| IFRS 13 | Fair value measurement - effective from 1 January 2013 | |||||
| This standard aims to improve consistency and reduce complexity by providing a precise definition of fair value and a single source of fair value measurement and disclosure requirements for use across IFRSs. The requirements, which are largely aligned between IFRSs and US GAAP, do not extend the use of fair value accounting but provide guidance on how it should be applied where its use is already required or permitted by other standards within IFRSs or US GAAP. This standard has not yet been endorsed by the EU. |
||||||
| IAS 1 (amendment) | Financial statement presentation - effective from 1 July 2012 | |||||
| The main change resulting from these amendments is a requirement for entities to group items presented in other comprehensive income on the basis of whether they are potentially reclassifiable to profit or loss subsequently. The amendments do not address which items are presented in other comprehensive income. This amendment has not yet been endorsed by the EU. |
||||||
The principal activities of the group are as follows:
Agriculture and horticulture Engineering Food storage and distribution Banking and financial services
For management reporting purposes these activities form the basis on which the group reports its primary divisions.
Segment information about these businesses is presented below:
| Agriculture and horticulture |
Engineering | Food storage and distribution |
Banking and financial services |
Other operations | Consolidated | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2011 £'000 |
2010 £'000 |
2011 £'000 |
2010 £'000 |
2011 £'000 |
2010 £'000 |
2011 £'000 |
2010 £'000 |
2011 £'000 |
2010 £'000 |
2011 £'000 |
2010 £'000 |
|
| Revenue External sales |
177,268 186,714 | 22,854 | 19,887 | 32,890 | 32,000 | 12,403 | 12,084 | 1,434 –––––– –––––– –––––– –––––– –––––– –––––– –––––– –––––– –––––– –––––– –––––– –––––– |
496 | 246,849 251,181 | ||
| Trading profit Segment profit/(loss) |
43,807 | 54,013 | 253 | 256 | 51 | (670) | 485 | 275 | 5 | 199 | 44,601 | 54,073 |
| Unallocated corporate expenses | –––––– –––––– –––––– –––––– –––––– –––––– –––––– –––––– –––––– –––––– | (5,368) | (5,689) | |||||||||
| Trading profit Share of associates' results Profit on disposal of non |
6,811 | 3,712 | 51 | 102 | –––––– –––––– 39,233 6,862 |
48,384 3,814 |
||||||
| current assets Profit on disposal of available |
534 | 4,144 | ||||||||||
| or-sale investments (Loss)/profit on transfer/ disposal of an associate |
178 (721) |
182 248 |
||||||||||
| Gain arising from changes in fair value of biological assets Investment income Net finance income |
7,320 | 11,111 | 7,320 1,074 4,170 |
11,111 957 4,301 |
||||||||
| Profit before tax Taxation |
–––––– –––––– 58,650 –––––– –––––– |
73,141 (16,860) (22,107) |
||||||||||
| Profit after tax | 41,790 –––––– –––––– |
51,034 | ||||||||||
| Other information Segment assets Investments in associates Assets classified as held for sale Unallocated assets |
260,793 259,535 | 27,209 | 21,999 | 22,737 | 22,807 | 237,623 268,324 38,077 |
29,276 6,161 |
4,299 | 4,302 2,502 |
552,661 576,967 38,077 – 89,624 –––––– –––––– |
31,778 6,161 85,787 |
|
| Consolidated total assets | 680,362 700,693 –––––– –––––– |
|||||||||||
| Segment liabilities Unallocated liabilities |
(36,244) (35,270) | (7,830) | (4,636) | (5,371) | (5,550)(201,074)(230,036) | (896) | (119)(251,415)(275,611) –––––– –––––– |
(67,240) (58,110) | ||||
| Consolidated total liabilities | (318,655)(333,721) –––––– –––––– |
|||||||||||
| Capital expenditure Depreciation Amortisation Impairments |
12,349 (4,912) (46) |
9,704 (4,526) (40) (219) |
6,275 (1,068) (8) |
5,884 (974) (9) |
1,135 (2,074) |
540 (2,309) |
660 (433) (456) |
313 (411) (559) |
371 (173) (177) |
45 (137) (396) |
20,790 (8,660) (510) (177) |
16,486 (8,357) (608) (615) |
Segment assets consist primarily of intangible assets, property, plant and equipment, biological assets, prepaid operating leases, inventories, trade and other receivables and cash and cash equivalents. Receivables for tax have been excluded. Investments in associates, valued using the equity method, have been shown separately in the segment information. Segment liabilities are primarily those relating to the operating activities and generally exclude liabilities for taxes, short-term loans, finance leases and non-current liabilities.
The group operations are based in nine main geographical areas. The United Kingdom is the home country of the parent. The principal geographical areas in which the group operates are as follows:
United Kingdom Continental Europe Bangladesh India Kenya Malawi North America and Bermuda South Africa South America
The following table provides an analysis of the group's sales by geographical market, irrespective of the origin of the goods/services:
| 2011 | 2010 | |
|---|---|---|
| £'000 | £'000 | |
| United Kingdom | 71,686 | 64,700 |
| Continental Europe | 27,750 | 27,632 |
| Bangladesh | 15,496 | 22,726 |
| India | 67,876 | 71,187 |
| Kenya | 21,547 | 28,185 |
| Malawi | 8,245 | 7,743 |
| North America and Bermuda | 6,708 | 9,168 |
| South Africa | 2,453 | 3,090 |
| South America | 4,582 | 3,633 |
| Other | 20,506 –––––––––– |
13,117 –––––––––– |
| 246,849 | 251,181 | |
| –––––––––– | –––––––––– |
The following is an analysis of the carrying amount of segment assets and additions to property, plant and equipment, analysed by the geographical area in which the assets are located:
| Carrying amount of | Additions to property, | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| segment assets | plant and equipment | ||||
| 2011 | 2010 | 2010 | |||
| £'000 | £'000 | £'000 | £'000 | ||
| United Kingdom | 283,083 | 308,317 | 8,062 | 6,438 | |
| Continental Europe | 5,900 | 5,871 | 377 | 250 | |
| Bangladesh | 39,503 | 44,954 | 1,230 | 490 | |
| India | 75,732 | 77,171 | 5,969 | 5,612 | |
| Kenya | 71,626 | 62,961 | 2,071 | 1,166 | |
| Malawi | 43,659 | 42,172 | 2,207 | 1,259 | |
| North America and Bermuda | 7,718 | 8,496 | 108 | 354 | |
| South Africa | 12,588 | 13,723 | 165 | 128 | |
| South America | 12,852 –––––––––– |
13,302 –––––––––– |
601 –––––––––– |
789 –––––––––– |
|
| 552,661 –––––––––– |
576,967 –––––––––– |
20,790 –––––––––– |
16,486 –––––––––– |
||
| 1 | Business and geographical segments (continued) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Results of banking subsidiaries | ||||
| 2011 | 2010 | |||
| £'000 | £'000 | |||
| Interest receivable | third parties | 3,119 | 2,992 | |
| group companies | – | – | ||
| –––––––––– 3,119 |
–––––––––– 2,992 |
|||
| Interest payable | third parties | (693) | (880) | |
| group companies | (49) | (43) | ||
| Net interest income | –––––––––– 2,377 |
–––––––––– 2,069 |
||
| Fee and commission income | 10,404 | 10,485 | ||
| Fee and commission expense | (427) | (513) | ||
| Inter-segment net interest | 49 | 43 | ||
| Revenue | –––––––––– 12,403 |
–––––––––– 12,084 |
||
| Other operating income | 102 | 113 | ||
| –––––––––– 12,505 |
–––––––––– 12,197 |
|||
| Operating expenses | (12,020) | (11,922) | ||
| Segment profit | –––––––––– 485 |
–––––––––– 275 |
||
| –––––––––– | –––––––––– | |||
| 2 | Revenue | |||
| An analysis of the group's revenue is as follows: | ||||
| 2011 | 2010 | |||
| £'000 | £'000 | |||
| Sale of goods | 178,211 | 186,714 | ||
| Distribution and warehousing revenue | 32,890 | 32,000 | ||
| Engineering services revenue | 22,854 | 19,887 | ||
| Banking service revenue | 12,403 | 12,084 | ||
| Agency commission revenue | 218 | 210 | ||
| Property rental revenue | 273 | 286 | ||
| Total group revenue | –––––––––– 246,849 |
–––––––––– 251,181 |
||
| Other operating income | 1,755 | 2,416 | ||
| Investment income | 1,074 | 957 | ||
| Interest income | 2,350 | 1,431 | ||
| Total group income | –––––––––– 252,028 –––––––––– |
–––––––––– 255,985 –––––––––– |
||
| 2011 | 2010 | |
|---|---|---|
| £'000 | £'000 | |
| The following items have been included in arriving at trading profit: | ||
| Employment costs (note 12) | 69,730 | 67,122 |
| Inventories: | ||
| Cost of inventories recognised as an expense (included in cost of sales) | 108,265 | 116,389 |
| Cost of inventories provision recognised as an expense (included in cost of sales) | 262 | 179 |
| Cost of inventories provision reversed (included in cost of sales) | (12) | – |
| Business interruption income received from insurance claim | 1,833 | 1,314 |
| Depreciation of property, plant and equipment: | ||
| Owned assets | 8,299 | 7,640 |
| Under finance leases | 361 | 717 |
| Amortisation of intangibles (included in administrative expenses) | 510 | 608 |
| Impairment of investments (included in administrative expenses) | 177 | 396 |
| Impairment of property, plant and equipment (included in administrative expenses) | – | 219 |
| Provision for claim (reversed)/provided (note 28) | (770) | 989 |
| Profit on disposal of property, plant and equipment | (164) | (518) |
| Operating leases – lease payments: | ||
| Plant and machinery | 334 | 364 |
| Property | 749 | 724 |
| Repairs and maintenance expenditure on property, plant and equipment | 4,533 –––––––––– |
4,519 –––––––––– |
| Currency exchange losses/(gains) charged/(credited) to income include: | ||
| Revenue | 140 | 34 |
| Cost of sales | 50 | 45 |
| Distribution costs | (30) | (173) |
| Administrative expenses | 81 | 128 |
| Other operating income | (26) | (12) |
| Finance income | (1,648) –––––––––– |
(4,054) –––––––––– |
| (1,433) –––––––––– |
(4,032) –––––––––– |
|
| Amounts paid to the group's auditors comprised: | ||
| Audit services: | ||
| Statutory audit | 786 | 796 |
| Audit – related regulatory reporting | 33 | 34 |
| Tax services: | ||
| Compliance services | 15 | 20 |
| Advisory services | 46 | 30 |
| Other services not covered above | 42 | 36 |
| –––––––––– 922 |
–––––––––– 916 |
|
| –––––––––– | –––––––––– |
Included in the above group audit fees and expenses is £779,000 (2010: £785,000) paid to PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP and its associates for statutory audit services, £33,000 (2010: £34,000) for audit related regulatory reporting, £61,000 (2010: £49,000) for taxation services and £38,000 (2010: £32,000) for other services.
The group's share of the results of associates is analysed below:
| 2011 £'000 |
2010 £'000 |
|---|---|
| 7,696 | 4,494 |
| (28) | (93) –––––––––– |
| 7,668 | 4,401 |
| (806) | (587) –––––––––– |
| 6,862 | 3,814 –––––––––– |
| –––––––––– –––––––––– –––––––––– |
The results include the group's share of the profits of West Hamilton Holdings Limited until 1 August 2011, as the group's shareholding fell from 28.2 per cent. to 14.1 per cent. following a rights issue which was not taken up by the group. With effect from 1 August 2011 the group's holding in West Hamilton was reclassified from an associated company to an available-for-sale investment.
An additional profit of £534,000 (2010: £4,144,000) has been realised in relation to the property, plant and equipment destroyed by a fire in 2010 at the Nuneaton premises of Abbey Metal Finishing Limited.
A loss of £721,000, after the transfer of £210,000 of exchange difference and other movements previously included in reserves, was realised in relation to the reclassification of the group's investment in West Hamilton Holdings Limited from an associated company.
In 2010, the group disposed of its entire shareholding in Siegfried Holding AG, an associated undertaking. The net proceeds on disposal were £48,754,000 and a net profit of £248,000 was realised, after the transfer of £16,353,000 of exchange difference and other movements previously included in reserves.
| 2011 | 2010 | |
|---|---|---|
| £'000 | £'000 | |
| Interest payable on loans and bank overdrafts | (584) | (568) |
| Interest payable on obligations under finance leases | (48) –––––––––– |
(93) –––––––––– |
| Finance costs | (632) | (661) |
| Finance income – interest income on short-term bank deposits | 2,350 | 1,431 |
| Net exchange gain on foreign currency cash balances | 1,648 | 4,054 |
| Pension schemes' net financing income/(expense) (note 30) | 804 –––––––––– |
(523) –––––––––– |
| Net finance income | 4,170 –––––––––– |
4,301 –––––––––– |
The above figures do not include any amounts relating to the banking subsidiaries.
| 8 | Taxation | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analysis of charge in the year | 2011 | 2010 | ||
| £'000 | £'000 | £'000 | ||
| Current tax | ||||
| UK corporation tax | ||||
| UK corporation tax at 26.5 per cent. (2010: 28.0 per cent.) | 1,484 | 3,265 | ||
| Double tax relief | (1,484) –––––––––– |
(3,265) –––––––––– |
||
| – | – | |||
| Foreign tax | ||||
| Corporation tax | 12,651 | 17,199 | ||
| Adjustment in respect of prior years | 35 –––––––––– |
362 –––––––––– |
||
| 12,686 –––––––––– |
17,561 –––––––––– |
|||
| Total current tax | 12,686 | 17,561 | ||
| Deferred tax | ||||
| Origination and reversal of timing differences | ||||
| United Kingdom | – | – | ||
| Overseas | 4,174 –––––––––– |
4,546 –––––––––– |
||
| Total deferred tax | 4,174 | 4,546 | ||
| Tax on profit on ordinary activities | –––––––––– 16,860 –––––––––– |
–––––––––– 22,107 –––––––––– |
||
| Factors affecting tax charge for the year | ||||
| Profit on ordinary activities before tax | 58,650 | 73,141 | ||
| Share of associated undertakings profit | 6,862 –––––––––– |
3,814 –––––––––– |
||
| Group profit on ordinary activities before tax | 51,788 –––––––––– |
69,327 –––––––––– |
||
| Tax on ordinary activities at the standard rate | ||||
| of corporation tax in the UK of 26.5 per cent. (2010: 28.0 per cent.) Effects of: |
13,724 | 19,412 | ||
| Adjustment to tax in respect of prior years | 35 | 362 | ||
| Expenses not deductible for tax purposes | 623 | 853 | ||
| Adjustment in respect of foreign tax rates | 3,064 | 2,507 | ||
| Additional tax arising on dividends from overseas companies | 381 | 599 | ||
| Profit on disposal of non taxable assets | – | (53) | ||
| Other income not charged to tax | (510) | (929) | ||
| Increase in tax losses carried forward | 220 | 301 | ||
| Decrease in tax losses carried forward | – | (28) | ||
| Movement in other timing differences | (677) | (917) | ||
| Total tax charge for the year | –––––––––– 16,860 |
–––––––––– 22,107 |
||
| –––––––––– | –––––––––– |
| 2011 £'000 |
2010 £'000 |
|
|---|---|---|
| The profit of the company was | 3,514 –––––––––– |
2,976 –––––––––– |
The company has taken the exemption under Section 408 of the Companies Act 2006 not to disclose the company's income statement.
| 2011 | 2010 | |
|---|---|---|
| £'000 | £'000 | |
| Amounts recognised as distributions to equity holders in the period: | ||
| Final dividend for the year ended 31 December 2010 of | ||
| 80p (2009: 74p) per share | 2,223 | 2,057 |
| Interim dividend for the year ended 31 December 2011 of | ||
| 30p (2010: 30p) per share | 834 | 834 |
| –––––––––– 3,057 |
–––––––––– 2,891 |
|
| –––––––––– | –––––––––– |
Dividends amounting to £69,000 (2010: £65,000) have not been included as group companies hold 62,500 issued shares in the company. These are classified as treasury shares.
| Proposed final dividend for the year ended 31 December 2011 of | ||
|---|---|---|
| 84p (2010: 80p) per share | 2,387 –––––––––– |
2,274 –––––––––– |
The proposed final dividend is subject to approval by the shareholders at the annual general meeting and has not been included as a liability in these financial statements.
| 2011 | 2010 | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Weighted | Weighted | |||||
| average | average | |||||
| number of | number of | |||||
| Earnings | shares | EPS | Earnings | shares | EPS | |
| £'000 | Number | Pence | £'000 | Number | Pence | |
| Basic and diluted EPS | ||||||
| Attributable to ordinary shareholders | 33,086 –––––––––– |
2,779,500 –––––––––– |
1,190.4 –––––––––– |
41,984 –––––––––– |
2,779,500 –––––––––– |
1,510.5 –––––––––– |
Basic and diluted earnings per share are calculated by dividing the earnings attributable to ordinary shareholders by the weighted average number of ordinary shares in issue during the period, excluding those held by the group as treasury shares (note 31).
| 2011 | 2010 | |
|---|---|---|
| Number | Number | |
| Average number of employees by activity: | ||
| Agriculture and horticulture | 72,556 | 72,538 |
| Engineering | 403 | 388 |
| Food storage and distribution | 262 | 288 |
| Banking and financial services | 119 | 120 |
| Central management | 20 –––––––––– |
19 –––––––––– |
| 73,360 –––––––––– |
73,353 –––––––––– |
|
| 2011 | 2010 | |
| £'000 | £'000 | |
| Employment costs: | ||
| Wages and salaries | 62,387 | 59,488 |
| Social security costs | 2,681 | 2,346 |
| Employee benefit obligations (see note 30) – UK | 1,277 | 1,321 |
| – Overseas | 3,385 –––––––––– |
3,967 –––––––––– |
| 69,730 –––––––––– |
67,122 –––––––––– |
|
Total remuneration paid to key employees who are members of the executive committee, excluding directors of Camellia Plc, amounted to £528,000 (2010: £623,000).
| 2011 £'000 |
2010 £'000 |
|
|---|---|---|
| Aggregate emoluments excluding pension contributions | 1,342 –––––––––– |
1,200 –––––––––– |
Emoluments of the highest paid director excluding pension contributions were £449,000 (2010: £420,000).
Further details of directors' emoluments are set out on pages 18 and 19.
| Licences, | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Customer | patents and | Computer | ||||
| Goodwill | relationships | trade marks | software | Total | ||
| £'000 | £'000 | £'000 | £'000 | £'000 | ||
| Group | ||||||
| Cost | ||||||
| At 1 January 2010 | 3,978 | 4,814 | 67 | 1,781 | 10,640 | |
| Exchange differences | – | – | – | 16 | 16 | |
| Additions | – | – | – | 91 | 91 | |
| Disposals | – –––––––––– |
– –––––––––– |
(67) –––––––––– |
(6) –––––––––– |
(73) –––––––––– |
|
| At 1 January 2011 | 3,978 | 4,814 | – | 1,882 | 10,674 | |
| Exchange differences | – | – | – | (37) | (37) | |
| Additions | – –––––––––– |
– –––––––––– |
– –––––––––– |
89 –––––––––– |
89 –––––––––– |
|
| At 31 December 2011 | 3,978 –––––––––– |
4,814 –––––––––– |
– –––––––––– |
1,934 –––––––––– |
10,726 –––––––––– |
|
| Amortisation | ||||||
| At 1 January 2010 | – | 870 | 67 | 1,119 | 2,056 | |
| Exchange differences | – | – | – | 7 | 7 | |
| Charge for the year | – | 241 | – | 367 | 608 | |
| Disposals | – –––––––––– |
– –––––––––– |
(67) –––––––––– |
(6) –––––––––– |
(73) –––––––––– |
|
| At 1 January 2011 | – | 1,111 | – | 1,487 | 2,598 | |
| Exchange differences | – | – | – | (25) | (25) | |
| Charge for the year | – –––––––––– |
241 –––––––––– |
– –––––––––– |
269 –––––––––– |
510 –––––––––– |
|
| At 31 December 2011 | – –––––––––– |
1,352 –––––––––– |
– –––––––––– |
1,731 –––––––––– |
3,083 –––––––––– |
|
| Net book value at 31 December 2011 | 3,978 | 3,462 | – | 203 | 7,643 | |
| Net book value at 31 December 2010 | –––––––––– 3,978 –––––––––– |
–––––––––– 3,703 –––––––––– |
–––––––––– – –––––––––– |
–––––––––– 395 –––––––––– |
–––––––––– 8,076 –––––––––– |
|
The group's impairment test in respect of intangible assets allocated to each component of the cash-generating unit (CGU) is performed as at 31 December each year. In line with the accounting policy, impairment testing is also performed whenever there is an indication that the assets may be impaired. There was no indication of impairment in the period to 31 December 2011. For the purpose of this impairment testing, the group's CGU components represent the asset management and financial planning elements of the holistic private banking service provided by Duncan Lawrie.
The recoverable amount of the CGU to which customer relationships and goodwill have been allocated was assessed at each respective testing date in 2010 and 2011.
The asset management component of the CGU is assessed on the basis of the fair value less costs to sell by applying industry average multiples to the value of assets under management.
The financial planning component of the CGU is assessed on the basis of value in use (VIU) by discounting management's projections of future cash flows. Given the inherent uncertainty in assessing the most appropriate discount rate to use when assessing the goodwill and customer relationships VIU, the group has used a range of rates from 5 per cent. to 15 per cent. to assess the VIU under a number of scenarios. These discount rates have been applied to the expected cash flows that will be generated by the VIU over a 20 year period, being the length of time over which the group believes that value will accrue given the inherently long term nature of private banking relationships. Management's judgement in estimating the cash flows of a CGU are based on both contracts that are in place and plans prepared by management.
Based on the conditions at the balance sheet date, a change in any of the key assumptions described above would not cause an impairment to be recognised in respect of goodwill and customer relationships.
| Fixtures, | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Land and | Plant and | fittings and | ||
| buildings | machinery | equipment | Total | |
| Group | £'000 | £'000 | £'000 | £'000 |
| Deemed cost | ||||
| At 1 January 2010 | 75,097 | 84,332 | 19,412 | 178,841 |
| Exchange differences | 1,190 | 2,139 | 113 | 3,442 |
| Additions | 6,956 | 8,519 | 1,011 | 16,486 |
| Disposals | (1,537) –––––––––– |
(4,197) –––––––––– |
(207) –––––––––– |
(5,941) –––––––––– |
| At 1 January 2011 | 81,706 | 90,793 | 20,329 | 192,828 |
| Exchange differences | (5,316) | (6,283) | (621) | (12,220) |
| Additions | 5,623 | 14,098 | 1,069 | 20,790 |
| Disposals | (105) –––––––––– |
(2,616) –––––––––– |
(148) –––––––––– |
(2,869) –––––––––– |
| At 31 December 2011 | 81,908 –––––––––– |
95,992 –––––––––– |
20,629 –––––––––– |
198,529 –––––––––– |
| Depreciation | ||||
| At 1 January 2010 | 31,809 | 55,698 | 10,843 | 98,350 |
| Exchange differences | 397 | 1,315 | 74 | 1,786 |
| Impairment | – | 219 | – | 219 |
| Charge for the year | 2,530 | 4,810 | 1,017 | 8,357 |
| Disposals | (827) –––––––––– |
(3,565) –––––––––– |
(168) –––––––––– |
(4,560) –––––––––– |
| At 1 January 2011 | 33,909 | 58,477 | 11,766 | 104,152 |
| Exchange differences | (2,048) | (3,839) | (468) | (6,355) |
| Charge for the year | 2,024 | 5,614 | 1,022 | 8,660 |
| Disposals | (64) –––––––––– |
(2,208) –––––––––– |
(231) –––––––––– |
(2,503) –––––––––– |
| At 31 December 2011 | 33,821 –––––––––– |
58,044 –––––––––– |
12,089 –––––––––– |
103,954 –––––––––– |
| Net book value at 31 December 2011 | 48,087 –––––––––– |
37,948 –––––––––– |
8,540 –––––––––– |
94,575 –––––––––– |
| Net book value at 31 December 2010 | 47,797 –––––––––– |
32,316 –––––––––– |
8,563 –––––––––– |
88,676 –––––––––– |
| Land and buildings at net book value comprise: | ||||
| 2011 | 2010 | |||
| £'000 | £'000 | |||
| Freehold | 25,877 | 27,369 | ||
| Long leasehold | 20,596 | 19,120 | ||
| Short leasehold | 1,614 | 1,308 | ||
| –––––––––– 48,087 –––––––––– |
–––––––––– 47,797 –––––––––– |
|||
Plant and machinery includes assets held under finance leases. The depreciation charge for the year in respect of these assets was £175,000 (2010: £462,000) and their net book value was £1,469,000 (2010: £1,359,000).
The amount of expenditure for property, plant and equipment in the course of construction amounted to £5,511,000 (2010: £3,622,000).
| Edible | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tea | nuts | Timber | Other | Total | |
| £'000 | £'000 | £'000 | £'000 | £'000 | |
| Group | |||||
| At 1 January 2010 | 64,566 | 16,445 | 8,336 | 16,720 | 106,067 |
| Exchange differences | 1,146 | 813 | (11) | 122 | 2,070 |
| New planting additions | 1,777 | 452 | 260 | 102 | 2,591 |
| Capitalised cultivation costs | – | 2,918 | – | 3,494 | 6,412 |
| Gains arising from changes in fair value | |||||
| less estimated point-of-sale costs | 6,953 | 834 | 1,459 | 1,865 | 11,111 |
| Decreases due to harvesting | – –––––––––– |
(2,639) –––––––––– |
(250) –––––––––– |
(4,362) –––––––––– |
(7,251) –––––––––– |
| At 1 January 2011 | 74,442 | 18,823 | 9,794 | 17,941 | 121,000 |
| Exchange differences | (8,080) | (1,885) | (549) | (1,459) | (11,973) |
| New planting additions | 1,795 | 420 | 273 | 37 | 2,525 |
| Capitalised cultivation costs | – | 2,751 | – | 4,575 | 7,326 |
| Gains arising from changes in fair value | |||||
| less estimated point-of-sale costs | 1,416 | 1,842 | 1,813 | 2,249 | 7,320 |
| Decreases due to harvesting | – –––––––––– |
(3,032) –––––––––– |
(206) –––––––––– |
(4,780) –––––––––– |
(8,018) –––––––––– |
| At 31 December 2011 | 69,573 –––––––––– |
18,919 –––––––––– |
11,125 –––––––––– |
18,563 –––––––––– |
118,180 –––––––––– |
Other includes avocados, citrus, grapes, livestock, maize, pineapples, rubber and soya.
Biological assets are carried at fair value. Where meaningful market-determined prices do not exist to assess the fair value of biological assets, the fair value has been determined based on the net present value of expected future cash flows from those assets, discounted at appropriate pre-tax rates. At 31 December 2011 professional valuations were obtained on a significant proportion of assets. In determining the fair value of biological assets where the discounting of expected future cash flows has been used, the directors have made certain assumptions about the expected life-span of the plantings, yields, selling prices and costs. The fair value of livestock is based on market prices of livestock of similar age and sex.
New planting additions represents new areas planted to the particular crop at cost.
For crops other than tea and rubber capitalised cultivation costs represent annual growing costs incurred. Growing costs for tea and rubber are charged directly to inventory which are included in cost of sales and do not include any uplift on initial recognition as no appropriate market value can be determined for green leaf and rubber produced at harvest prior to manufacturing.
Decreases due to harvesting represent values transferred to cost of sales at the point of harvest for agricultural produce other than tea and rubber.
The discount rates used reflect the cost of capital, an assessment of country risk and the risks associated with individual crops. The range of discount rates used is:
| Edible | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tea | nuts | Timber | Other | ||
| % | % | % | % | ||
| 2011 | 13.5 | 12.0 – 13.5 | 17.5 | 5.0 – 17.5 | |
| 2010 | 13.5 | 12.0 – 13.5 | 17.5 | 5.0 – 17.5 |
The group is exposed to financial risks arising from changes in the prices of the agricultural products it produces. The group does not anticipate that these prices will decline significantly in the foreseeable future. There are no futures markets available for the majority of crops grown by the group. Further the group's exposure to this risk is mitigated by the geographical spread of its operations, selective forward selling in certain instances when considered appropriate, and regular review of available market data on sales and production. The group monitors closely the returns it achieves from its crops and considers replacing its biological assets when yields decline with age or markets change.
Further financial risk arises from changes in market prices of key cost components, such costs are closely monitored.
The areas planted to the various crop types at the end of the year were:
| 2011 | 2010 | |
|---|---|---|
| Hectares | Hectares | |
| Tea | 35,280 | 35,028 |
| Macadamia | 2,713 | 2,669 |
| Pistachios | 130 | 130 |
| Timber | 6,321 | 6,054 |
| Arable crops | 3,297 | 3,297 |
| Avocados | 411 | 409 |
| Citrus | 178 | 178 |
| Pineapples | 45 | 42 |
| Rubber | 1,960 | 1,827 |
| Wine grapes | 84 –––––––––– |
84 –––––––––– |
| 2011 | 2010 | |
| Head | Head | |
| Livestock numbers on hand at the end of the year | 4,436 –––––––––– |
5,176 –––––––––– |
| Output of agricultural produce during the year was: | ||
| 2011 | 2010 | |
| Metric | Metric | |
| tonnes | tonnes | |
| Tea | 68,667 | 74,628 |
| Macadamia | 1,094 | 1,122 |
| Pistachios | 21 | 783 |
| Arable crops | 13,923 | 16,227 |
| Avocados | 5,822 | 7,748 |
| Citrus | 6,217 | 4,532 |
| Pineapples | 1,777 | 1,571 |
| Rubber | 700 | 836 |
| Wine grapes | 553 –––––––––– |
534 –––––––––– |
| 2011 | 2010 | |
| Cubic | Cubic | |
| metres | metres | |
| Timber | 48,297 –––––––––– |
44,375 –––––––––– |
| £'000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Group | |||
| Cost | |||
| At 1 January 2010 | 1,092 | ||
| Exchange differences | (33) –––––––––– |
||
| At 1 January 2011 | 1,059 | ||
| Exchange differences | (48) –––––––––– |
||
| At 31 December 2011 | 1,011 –––––––––– | ||
| Amortisation At 1 January 2010 |
18 | ||
| Exchange differences | – | ||
| Charge for the year | 1 –––––––––– | ||
| At 1 January 2011 | 19 | ||
| Exchange differences | (1) | ||
| Charge for the year | 1 –––––––––– | ||
| At 31 December 2011 | 19 –––––––––– | ||
| Net book value at 31 December 2011 | 992 –––––––––– | ||
| Net book value at 31 December 2010 | 1,040 –––––––––– | ||
| 18 | Investments in subsidiaries | ||
| 2011 | 2010 |
| £'000 | £'000 | |
|---|---|---|
| Company | ||
| Cost | ||
| At 1 January | 73,508 | 73,683 |
| Transfer to group company | – –––––––––– |
(175) –––––––––– |
| At 31 December | 73,508 –––––––––– |
73,508 –––––––––– |
| 2011 | 2010 | |
|---|---|---|
| £'000 | £'000 | |
| Group | ||
| At 1 January | 31,778 | 97,364 |
| Exchange differences | (611) | 2,731 |
| Transfer from/(to) held for sale | 6,161 | (6,161) |
| Transfer to financial assets | (1,486) | – |
| Impairment on transfer to financial assets | (931) | – |
| Disposals | – | (64,859) |
| Share of profit (note 4) | 6,862 | 3,814 |
| Dividends | (1,221) | (1,220) |
| Other equity movements | (2,475) –––––––––– |
109 –––––––––– |
| At 31 December | 38,077 –––––––––– |
31,778 –––––––––– |
At 1 January 2011, the group's holding in its Bangladeshi associated undertakings United Insurance Company Limited and United Leasing Company Limited of £6,161,000 has been reclassified from assets held for sale to investments in associates, as the proposed sale did not materialise.
The transfer to financial assets relates to the group's investment in West Hamilton Holdings Limited, as the group's shareholding fell from 28.2 per cent. to 14.1 per cent. following a rights issue which was not taken up by the group. As a result, with effect from 1 August 2011 West Hamilton was reclassified from an associated company to an available-for-sale investment.
In 2010, the group disposed of its entire shareholding in Siegfried Holding AG.
Details of the group's associates are shown in note 38.
The group's share of the results of its principal associates and its share of the assets (including goodwill) and liabilities are as follows:
| Assets | Liabilities | Revenues | Profit/(loss) | Market value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| £'000 | £'000 | £'000 | £'000 | £'000 | |
| 31 December 2011 | 176,055 | (137,978) | 41,076 | 6,862 | 38,253 |
| –––––––––– | –––––––––– | –––––––––– | –––––––––– | –––––––––– | |
| 31 December 2010 | 133,389 | (101,611) | 39,170 | 3,814 | 20,076 |
| –––––––––– | –––––––––– | –––––––––– | –––––––––– | –––––––––– |
| Group | Company | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2011 | 2010 | 2011 | 2010 | |
| £'000 | £'000 | £'000 | £'000 | |
| Cost or fair value | ||||
| At 1 January | 31,632 | 35,998 | 170 | 190 |
| Exchange differences | 99 | 732 | – | – |
| Fair value adjustment | (2,201) | 385 | – | – |
| Transfer to group company | – | – | – | (222) |
| Additions | 10,159 | 7,057 | – | 202 |
| Transfer from investment in associates | 1,486 | – | – | – |
| Disposals | (5,480) | (12,540) | – | – |
| Fair value adjustment for disposal | 2 –––––––––– |
– –––––––––– |
– –––––––––– |
– –––––––––– |
| At 31 December | 35,697 –––––––––– |
31,632 –––––––––– |
170 –––––––––– |
170 –––––––––– |
| Provision for diminution in value | ||||
| At 1 January | 1,135 | 742 | ||
| Exchange differences | 11 | 13 | ||
| Provided during year | 177 | 396 | ||
| Disposals | – –––––––––– |
(16) –––––––––– |
||
| At 31 December | 1,323 –––––––––– |
1,135 –––––––––– |
||
| Net book value at 31 December | 34,374 –––––––––– |
30,497 –––––––––– |
170 –––––––––– |
170 –––––––––– |
| Net book value comprises: | ||||
| Held-to-maturity investments: | ||||
| UK Treasury bills | 3,228 | – | ||
| Bank and building society certificates of deposit | 2,601 | 5,313 | ||
| 5,829 | 5,313 | |||
| Available-for-sale financial assets: | ||||
| Listed investments | 28,366 | 25,010 | ||
| Unlisted investments | 179 | 174 | 170 | 170 |
| 28,545 | 25,184 | |||
| –––––––––– 34,374 –––––––––– |
–––––––––– 30,497 –––––––––– |
–––––––––– 170 –––––––––– |
–––––––––– 170 –––––––––– |
|
| Current element | 5,829 | 5,313 | – | – |
| Non-current element | 28,545 | 25,184 | 170 | 170 |
| –––––––––– 34,374 |
–––––––––– 30,497 |
–––––––––– 170 |
–––––––––– 170 |
|
| –––––––––– | –––––––––– | –––––––––– | –––––––––– |
UK Treasury bills and bank and building society certificates of deposit are held by the group's banking operation.
| Group | Company | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2011 | 2010 | 2011 | 2010 | |
| £'000 | £'000 | £'000 | £'000 | |
| Cost or fair value | ||||
| At 1 January | 7,362 | 7,317 | 7,367 | 7,322 |
| Additions | 1,009 | 124 | 1,009 | 124 |
| Disposals | (3) –––––––––– |
(79) –––––––––– |
(3) –––––––––– |
(79) –––––––––– |
| At 31 December | 8,368 –––––––––– |
7,362 –––––––––– |
8,373 –––––––––– |
7,367 –––––––––– |
| Cost or fair value comprises: | ||||
| Collections | 8,368 –––––––––– |
7,362 –––––––––– |
8,373 –––––––––– |
7,367 –––––––––– |
| 8,368 –––––––––– |
7,362 –––––––––– |
8,373 –––––––––– |
7,367 –––––––––– |
|
Collections comprise the group's and company's investment in fine art, philately, documents and manuscripts. The market value of collections is expected to be in excess of book value.
| 2011 | 2010 | |
|---|---|---|
| £'000 | £'000 | |
| Group | ||
| Made Tea | 22,371 | 21,195 |
| Other agricultural produce | 1,342 | 1,012 |
| Work in progress | 1,460 | 988 |
| Trading stocks | 2,893 | 3,113 |
| Raw materials and consumables | 11,111 | 8,906 |
| –––––––––– 39,177 –––––––––– |
–––––––––– 35,214 –––––––––– |
|
Made tea is included in inventory at cost as no reliable fair value is available to reflect the uplift in value upon initial recognition of harvested green leaf.
The year end inventories balance includes a provision of £152,000 (2010: £102,000).
Inventory categories have been reviewed and 2010 figures reclassified.
| 2011 | 2010 | |
|---|---|---|
| £'000 | £'000 | |
| Group | ||
| Current: | ||
| Amounts due from customers of banking subsidiaries | 23,576 | 21,487 |
| Trade receivables | 25,886 | 24,072 |
| Amounts owed by associated undertakings | 282 | 285 |
| Other receivables | 6,988 | 6,777 |
| Prepayments and accrued income | 6,140 –––––––––– |
7,767 –––––––––– |
| 62,872 –––––––––– |
60,388 –––––––––– |
|
| Non-current: | ||
| Amounts due from customers of banking subsidiaries | 12,936 | 16,621 |
| Other receivables | 967 –––––––––– |
1,137 –––––––––– |
| 13,903 –––––––––– |
17,758 –––––––––– |
|
Included within trade receivables is a provision for doubtful debts of £365,000 (2010: £387,000).
Trade receivables include receivables of £5,025,000 (2010: £3,739,000) which are past due at the reporting date against which the group has not provided, as there has not been a significant change in credit quality and the amounts are still considered recoverable. Ageing of past due but not provided for receivables is as follows:
| 2011 | 2010 |
|---|---|
| £'000 | £'000 |
| 3,613 | 2,127 |
| 800 | 656 |
| 148 | 262 |
| 464 | 694 –––––––––– |
| 5,025 | 3,739 –––––––––– |
| –––––––––– –––––––––– |
| Group | Company | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2011 | 2010 | 2011 | 2010 | |
| £'000 | £'000 | £'000 | £'000 | |
| Group | ||||
| Cash at bank and in hand | 196,852 | 217,008 | – | – |
| Short-term bank deposits | 45,226 | 29,503 | 6,323 | – |
| Short-term liquid investments | 18,838 –––––––––– |
44,638 –––––––––– |
– –––––––––– |
– –––––––––– |
| 260,916 –––––––––– |
291,149 –––––––––– |
6,323 –––––––––– |
– –––––––––– |
Included in the amounts above are cash and short-term funds, time deposits with banks and building societies, UK treasury bills and certificates of deposit amounting to £181,278,000 (2010: £210,429,000) which are held by the group's banking subsidiaries and which are an integral part of the banking operations.
Cash, cash equivalents and bank overdrafts include the following for the purposes of the cash flow statement:
| Group | Company | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2011 | 2010 | 2011 | 2010 | |
| £'000 | £'000 | £'000 | £'000 | |
| Cash and cash equivalents (excluding banking operations) | 79,638 | 80,720 | 6,323 | – |
| Bank overdrafts (note 27) | (7,012) –––––––––– |
(5,447) –––––––––– |
– –––––––––– |
– –––––––––– |
| 72,626 –––––––––– |
75,273 –––––––––– |
6,323 –––––––––– |
– –––––––––– |
|
| Effective interest rate: | ||||
| 2011 | 2010 | 2011 | 2010 | |
| % | % | % | % | |
| Short-term deposits | 0.00 – 25.00 | 0.20 – 10.80 | 1.05 | – |
| Short-term liquid investments | 0.01 – 0.10 | 0.09 – 0.99 | – | – |
| Average maturity period: | ||||
| 2011 | 2010 | 2011 | 2010 | |
| days | days | days | days | |
| Short-term deposits | 78 | 72 | 163 | – |
| Short-term liquid investments | 35 | 34 | – | – |
At 1 January 2011, the group's holding in its Bangladeshi associated undertakings United Insurance Company Limited and United Leasing Company Limited of £6,161,000 has been reclassified from assets held for sale to investments in associates, as the proposed sale did not materialise.
| Group | Company | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2011 | 2010 | 2011 | 2010 | |
| £'000 | £'000 | £'000 | £'000 | |
| Current: | ||||
| Amounts due to customers of banking subsidiaries | 192,145 | 218,354 | – | – |
| Trade payables | 23,419 | 22,367 | – | – |
| Other taxation and social security | 1,871 | 1,625 | – | – |
| Other payables | 15,025 | 13,888 | 144 | 17 |
| Accruals | 4,161 –––––––––– |
4,517 –––––––––– |
5 –––––––––– |
– –––––––––– |
| 236,621 –––––––––– |
260,751 –––––––––– |
149 –––––––––– |
17 –––––––––– |
|
| Non-current: | ||||
| Amounts due to customers of banking subsidiaries | 7,652 –––––––––– |
9,644 –––––––––– |
– –––––––––– |
– –––––––––– |
| 2011 | 2010 | |
|---|---|---|
| £'000 | £'000 | |
| Group | ||
| Current Bank overdrafts |
7,012 | 5,447 |
| Bank loans | 110 | 50 |
| Finance leases | 188 | 493 |
| –––––––––– 7,310 –––––––––– |
–––––––––– 5,990 –––––––––– |
|
| Current borrowings include the following amounts secured | ||
| on biological assets and property, plant and equipment: | ||
| Bank overdrafts | 5,383 | 4,597 |
| Bank loans | 110 | 50 |
| Finance leases | 188 –––––––––– |
493 –––––––––– |
| 5,681 –––––––––– |
5,140 –––––––––– |
|
| Non-current | ||
| Bank loans | 123 | 186 |
| Finance leases | 58 –––––––––– |
256 –––––––––– |
| 181 –––––––––– |
442 –––––––––– |
|
| Non-current borrowings include the following amounts | ||
| secured on biological assets and property, plant and equipment: | ||
| Bank loans | 123 | 186 |
| Finance leases | 58 –––––––––– |
256 –––––––––– |
| 181 –––––––––– |
442 –––––––––– |
|
| The repayment of bank loans and overdrafts fall due as follows: | ||
| Within one year or on demand (included in current liabilities) | 7,122 | 5,497 |
| Between 1 – 2 years | 36 | 45 |
| Between 2 – 5 years | 57 | 91 |
| After 5 years | 30 –––––––––– |
50 –––––––––– |
| 7,245 –––––––––– |
5,683 –––––––––– |
|
| Minimum finance lease payments fall due as follows: | ||
| Within one year or on demand (included in current liabilities) | 200 | 528 |
| Between 1 – 2 years | 38 | 217 |
| Between 2 – 5 years | 23 –––––––––– |
50 –––––––––– |
| 261 | 795 | |
| Future finance charges on finance leases | (15) –––––––––– |
(46) –––––––––– |
| Present value of finance lease liabilities | 246 –––––––––– |
749 –––––––––– |
The present value of finance lease liabilities fall due as follows:
| 2011 | 2010 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| £'000 | £'000 | |||
| Within one year or on demand (included in current liabilities) | 188 | 493 | ||
| Between 1 – 2 years | 36 | 207 | ||
| Between 2 – 5 years | 22 –––––––––– |
49 –––––––––– |
||
| 246 –––––––––– |
749 –––––––––– |
|||
| The rates of interest payable by the group ranged between: | ||||
| 2011 | 2010 | |||
| % | % | |||
| Overdrafts | 3.20 – 13.00 | 2.50 – 17.50 | ||
| Bank loans | 9.00 – 13.00 | 9.00 – 11.00 | ||
| Finance leases | 4.29 – 18.00 | 3.76 – 18.00 | ||
| 28 | Provisions | |||
| Onerous lease | Others | Total | ||
| £'000 | £'000 | £'000 | ||
| Group | ||||
| At 1 January 2010 | 150 | – | 150 | |
| Exchange differences | – | (26) | (26) | |
| Provided in the period | 900 | 989 | 1,889 | |
| Utilised in the period | (150) –––––––––– |
– –––––––––– |
(150) –––––––––– |
|
| At 1 January 2011 | 900 | 963 | 1,863 | |
| Exchange differences | – | (93) | (93) | |
| Utilised in the period | (150) | (36) | (186) | |
| Unused amounts reversed in period | – –––––––––– |
(770) –––––––––– |
(770) –––––––––– |
|
| At 31 December 2011 | 750 –––––––––– |
64 –––––––––– |
814 –––––––––– |
|
| Current | ||||
| At 31 December 2011 | 150 –––––––––– |
64 –––––––––– |
214 –––––––––– |
|
| At 31 December 2010 | 150 –––––––––– |
963 –––––––––– |
1,113 –––––––––– |
|
| Non-current | ||||
| At 31 December 2011 | 600 –––––––––– |
– –––––––––– |
600 –––––––––– |
|
| At 31 December 2010 | 750 –––––––––– |
– –––––––––– |
750 –––––––––– |
|
The provision for onerous lease relates to five years lease commitments, which is the expected period of vacancy, for warehouse premises. The lease expires in 2016.
The reversal of £770,000 reflects a write back of the provision against a claim made by Del Monte Kenya Limited against Kakuzi Limited in 2010, which is no longer required.
The net movement on the deferred tax account is set out below:
| Group | Company | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2011 | 2010 | 2011 | 2010 | |
| £'000 | £'000 | £'000 | £'000 | |
| At 1 January | 34,393 | 30,346 | 313 | 337 |
| Exchange differences | (3,309) | 385 | – | – |
| Charged/(credited) to the income statement | 4,174 | 4,546 | (12) | (24) |
| Credited to equity | (21) –––––––––– |
(884) –––––––––– |
– –––––––––– |
– –––––––––– |
| At 31 December | 35,237 –––––––––– |
34,393 –––––––––– |
301 –––––––––– |
313 –––––––––– |
The movement in deferred tax assets and liabilities is set out below:
| Accelerated | Pension | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| tax | scheme | |||
| depreciation | liability | Other | Total | |
| £'000 | £'000 | £'000 | £'000 | |
| At 1 January 2010 | 33,827 | 935 | 72 | 34,834 |
| Exchange differences | 567 | 54 | 1 | 622 |
| Charged/(credited) to the income statement | 3,624 | 122 | (74) | 3,672 |
| Credited to equity | – –––––––––– |
(833) –––––––––– |
– –––––––––– |
(833) –––––––––– |
| At 1 January 2011 | 38,018 | 278 | (1) | 38,295 |
| Exchange differences | (3,722) | (37) | 12 | (3,747) |
| Charged/(credited) to the income statement | 2,651 | (3) | 831 | 3,479 |
| (Credited)/charged to equity | – | (20) | 5 | (15) |
| Transfers between categories | 340 –––––––––– |
(63) –––––––––– |
(52) –––––––––– |
225 –––––––––– |
| At 31 December 2011 | 37,287 –––––––––– |
155 –––––––––– |
795 –––––––––– |
38,237 |
| Deferred tax assets offset | (2,842) –––––––––– |
|||
| Net deferred tax liability after offset | 35,395 –––––––––– | |||
Included within deferred tax liabilities are £32,087,000 (2010: £33,178,000) of accelerated tax depreciation relating to biological assets.
Deferred tax liabilities of £8,648,000 (2010: £9,226,000) have not been recognised for the withholding tax and other taxes that would be payable on the unremitted earnings of certain subsidiaries. Such amounts are permanently reinvested.
Deferred tax assets are recognised for tax losses carried forward only to the extent that the realisation of the related tax benefit through future taxable profits is probable. The group has not recognised deferred tax assets of £5,076,000 (2010: £5,818,000) in respect of losses that can be carried forward against future taxable income.
Certain group subsidiaries operate defined contribution and funded defined benefit pension schemes. The most significant is the UK funded, final salary defined benefit scheme. The assets of this scheme are administered by trustees and are kept separate from those of the group. On 1 July 2011, the three UK defined benefit pension schemes were merged to form the Linton Park Pension Scheme (2011). A full actuarial valuation was undertaken as at 1 July 2011 and updated to 31 December by a qualified independent actuary. The UK final salary defined benefit pension scheme is closed to new entrants and new employees are eligible to join a group personal pension plan. Members who formerly belonged to the Unochrome Group Pension Scheme are closed to future accruals and active members participate in a defined contribution scheme. From 1 July 2011, active members of the Linton Park Pension Scheme (2011) earn accruals at a rate of 1/80th per year of service from a rate of 1/60th per year of service previously earned as members of the Linton Park Pension Scheme or the Lawrie Group Pension Scheme.
The overseas schemes are operated in group subsidiaries located in Bangladesh, India and The Netherlands. Actuarial valuations have been updated to 31 December 2011 by qualified actuaries for these schemes.
The major assumptions used in the valuation to determine the present value of the schemes' defined benefit obligations were as follows:
| 2011 | 2010 | |
|---|---|---|
| % per annum | % per annum | |
| UK schemes | ||
| Rate of increase in salaries | 2.00 | 3.10 |
| Rate of increase to LPI (Limited Price Indexation) pensions in payment | 2.00 – 5.00 | 2.50 – 5.00 |
| Discount rate applied to scheme liabilities | 4.70 | 5.40 |
| Inflation assumption (CPI/RPI) | 2.00 / 3.00 | 3.00 / 3.60 |
Assumptions regarding future mortality experience are based on advice received from independent actuaries. The current mortality tables used are PCA00 with medium cohort improvement factors and subject to a minimum rate of improvement of 1 per cent. per annum, projected by year of birth and with an age rating of +2 years. This results in males and females aged 65 having life expectancies of 21 years and 23 years respectively.
| Rate of increase in salaries | 2.00 – 7.00 | 2.00 – 7.00 |
|---|---|---|
| Rate of increase to LPI (Limited Price Indexation) pensions in payment | 0.00 – 3.00 | 0.00 – 3.00 |
| Discount rate applied to scheme liabilities | 4.60 – 9.00 | 5.00 – 9.00 |
| Inflation assumption | 0.00 – 7.00 | 0.00 – 7.00 |
The major assumptions used to determine the expected future return on the schemes' assets were as follows:
| UK schemes | ||
|---|---|---|
| Equities and property | 6.50 | 7.80 |
| Bonds | 3.60 | 4.70 |
| Cash | 0.50 | 0.50 |
| Overseas schemes | ||
| Bonds | 7.51 – 9.00 | 7.35 – 9.00 |
| Cash | 7.51 – 9.00 | 7.35 – 9.00 |
| Other | 4.60 | 5.00 |
Certain group subsidiaries located in Kenya, India and Bangladesh have an obligation to pay terminal gratuities, based on years of service. These obligations are estimated annually using the projected unit method by qualified independent actuaries. Schemes operated in India are funded but the schemes operated in Kenya and Bangladesh are unfunded. Operations in India and Bangladesh also have an obligation to pay medical benefits upon retirement. These schemes are unfunded.
The major assumptions used in the valuation to determine the present value of the post-employment benefit obligations were as follows:
| Rate of increase in salaries | 5.00– 10.00 | 7.00 – 9.50 |
|---|---|---|
| Discount rate applied to scheme liabilities | 8.50 – 13.50 | 8.00 – 9.00 |
| Inflation assumption | 0.00 – 10.00 | 0.00 – 5.00 |
| 2011 | 2010 | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UK | Overseas | Total | UK | Overseas | Total | |
| £'000 | £'000 | £'000 | £'000 | £'000 | £'000 | |
| Equities and property | 84,107 | 352 | 84,459 | 90,929 | 369 | 91,298 |
| Bonds | 36,679 | 12,555 | 49,234 | 32,929 | 14,711 | 47,640 |
| Cash | 1,624 | 2,479 | 4,103 | 2,181 | 2,531 | 4,712 |
| Other | – –––––––– |
2,547 –––––––– |
2,547 –––––––– |
– –––––––– |
2,241 –––––––– |
2,241 –––––––– |
| Total fair value of plan assets | 122,410 | 17,933 | 140,343 | 126,039 | 19,852 | 145,891 |
| Present value of defined benefit | ||||||
| obligations | (144,403) –––––––– |
(22,832) –––––––– |
(167,235) –––––––– |
(133,805) –––––––– |
(24,455) –––––––– |
(158,260) –––––––– |
| Total deficit in the schemes | (21,993) –––––––– |
(4,899) –––––––– |
(26,892) –––––––– |
(7,766) –––––––– |
(4,603) –––––––– |
(12,369) –––––––– |
| Amount recognised as asset in the | ||||||
| balance sheet | – | 437 | 437 | – | 835 | 835 |
| Amount recognised as current liability | ||||||
| in the balance sheet | – | (374) | (374) | – | (352) | (352) |
| Amount recognised as non-current | ||||||
| liability in the balance sheet | (21,993) –––––––– |
(4,962) –––––––– |
(26,955) –––––––– |
(7,766) –––––––– |
(5,086) –––––––– |
(12,852) –––––––– |
| (21,993) | (4,899) | (26,892) | (7,766) | (4,603) | (12,369) | |
| Related deferred tax asset (note 29) | – | 891 | 891 | – | 912 | 912 |
| Related deferred tax liability (note 29) | – –––––––– |
(155) –––––––– |
(155) –––––––– |
– –––––––– |
(278) –––––––– |
(278) –––––––– |
| Net deficit | (21,993) –––––––– |
(4,163) –––––––– |
(26,156) –––––––– |
(7,766) –––––––– |
(3,969) –––––––– |
(11,735) –––––––– |
Movements in the fair value of scheme assets were as follows:
| 2011 | 2010 | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UK | Overseas | Total | UK | Overseas | Total | |
| £'000 | £'000 | £'000 | £'000 | £'000 | £'000 | |
| At 1 January | 126,039 | 19,852 | 145,891 | 104,530 | 17,533 | 122,063 |
| Expected return on plan assets | 8,274 | 1,343 | 9,617 | 6,874 | 1,307 | 8,181 |
| Employer contributions | 818 | 716 | 1,534 | 9,059 | 1,702 | 10,761 |
| Contributions paid by plan participants | 179 | 5 | 184 | 371 | 7 | 378 |
| Benefit payments | (6,083) | (1,534) | (7,617) | (5,875) | (1,991) | (7,866) |
| Actuarial (losses)/gains | (6,817) | 285 | (6,532) | 11,080 | 334 | 11,414 |
| Exchange differences | – –––––––– |
(2,734) –––––––– |
(2,734) –––––––– |
– –––––––– |
960 –––––––– |
960 –––––––– |
| At 31 December | 122,410 –––––––– |
17,933 –––––––– |
140,343 –––––––– |
126,039 –––––––– |
19,852 –––––––– |
145,891 –––––––– |
Movements in the present value of defined benefit obligations were as follows:
| 2011 | 2010 | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UK | Overseas | Total | UK | Overseas | Total | |
| £'000 | £'000 | £'000 | £'000 | £'000 | £'000 | |
| At 1 January | (133,805) | (24,455) | (158,260) | (128,720) | (17,334) | (146,054) |
| Transfer from other employee benefits* | – | – | – | – | (1,891) | (1,891) |
| Current service cost | (726) | (1,132) | (1,858) | (731) | (1,241) | (1,972) |
| Past service cost | 164 | – | 164 | – | (307) | (307) |
| Contributions paid by plan participants | (179) | (5) | (184) | (371) | (7) | (378) |
| Interest cost | (7,081) | (1,732) | (8,813) | (7,207) | (1,497) | (8,704) |
| Benefit payments | 6,083 | 1,534 | 7,617 | 5,875 | 1,991 | 7,866 |
| Actuarial losses | (8,859) | (218) | (9,077) | (2,651) | (3,306) | (5,957) |
| Exchange differences | – –––––––– |
3,176 –––––––– |
3,176 –––––––– |
– –––––––– |
(863) –––––––– |
(863) –––––––– |
| At 31 December | (144,403) –––––––– |
(22,832) –––––––– |
(167,235) –––––––– |
(133,805) –––––––– |
(24,455) –––––––– |
(158,260) –––––––– |
In 2009, the total fair value of plan assets was £122,063,000, present value of defined benefit obligations was £146,054,000 and the deficit was £23,991,000. In 2008, the total fair value of plan assets was £106,142,000, present value of defined benefit obligations was £130,104,000 and the deficit was £23,962,000 and in 2007, the total fair value of plan assets was £127,037,000, present value of defined benefit obligations was £131,879,000 and the deficit was £4,842,000.
*Relates to gratuities schemes operated by group companies, previously included in other employee benefits.
The amounts recognised in the income statement are as follows:
| 2011 | 2010 | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UK £'000 |
Overseas £'000 |
Total £'000 |
UK £'000 |
Overseas £'000 |
Total £'000 |
|
| Amounts (charged)/credited to | ||||||
| operating profit: Current service cost |
(726) | (1,132) | (1,858) | (731) | (1,241) | (1,972) |
| Past service cost | 164 | – | 164 | – | (307) | (307) |
| Total operating charge | –––––––– (562) –––––––– |
–––––––– (1,132) –––––––– |
–––––––– (1,694) –––––––– |
–––––––– (731) –––––––– |
–––––––– (1,548) –––––––– |
–––––––– (2,279) –––––––– |
| Amounts credited/(charged) to other finance costs: |
||||||
| Expected return on pension scheme assets |
8,274 | 1,343 | 9,617 | 6,874 | 1,307 | 8,181 |
| Interest on pension scheme liabilities | (7,081) | (1,732) | (8,813) | (7,207) | (1,497) | (8,704) |
| Net financing income/(charged) (note 7) | –––––––– 1,193 |
–––––––– (389) |
–––––––– 804 |
–––––––– (333) |
–––––––– (190) |
–––––––– (523) |
| Total credited/(charged) to income statement |
–––––––– 631 –––––––– |
–––––––– (1,521) –––––––– |
–––––––– (890) –––––––– |
–––––––– (1,064) –––––––– |
–––––––– (1,738) –––––––– |
–––––––– (2,802) –––––––– |
Employer contributions to defined contribution schemes are charged to profit when payable and the costs charged were £2,968,000 (2010: £3,009,000).
The amounts included in the statement of comprehensive income are as follows:
| 2011 | 2010 | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UK | Overseas | Total | UK | Overseas | Total | |||||
| £'000 | £'000 | £'000 | £'000 | £'000 | £'000 | |||||
| (6,817) | 285 | (6,532) | 11,080 | 334 | 11,414 | |||||
| (1,946) | (218) | (2,164) | 186 | (3,306) | (3,120) | |||||
| (6,913) | – | (6,913) | (2,837) | – | (2,837) –––––––– |
|||||
| (15,676) –––––––– |
67 –––––––– |
(15,609) –––––––– |
8,429 –––––––– |
(2,972) –––––––– |
5,457 –––––––– |
|||||
| –––––––– | –––––––– | –––––––– | –––––––– | –––––––– |
Cumulative actuarial losses recognised in the statement of comprehensive income are £28,276,000 (2010: £12,667,000).
| 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UK Overseas | Total | UK Overseas | Total | UK Overseas | Total | ||||
| Difference between expected and actual return on scheme assets: | |||||||||
| Amount (£'000) | (6,817) | 285 | (6,532) | 11,080 | 334 | 11,414 | 11,377 | 82 | 11,459 |
| Percentage of scheme assets | (5.6%) | 1.6% | (4.7%) | 8.8% | 1.7% | 7.8% | 10.9% | 0.5% | 9.4% |
| Experience gains and losses on scheme liabilities: | |||||||||
| Amount (£'000) | (1,946) | (218) | (2,164) | 186 | (3,306) | (3,120) | 2,654 | 572 | 3,226 |
| Percentage of present value of scheme liabilities | (1.3%) | (1.0%) | (1.3%) | 0.1% | (13.5%) | (2.0%) | 2.1% | 3.3% | 2.2% |
| Effects to changes in assumptions underlying the present value of the scheme liabilities: |
|||||||||
| Amount (£'000) | (6,913) | – | (6,913) | (2,837) | – | (2,837) (17,342) | – (17,342) | ||
| Percentage of present value of scheme liabilities | (4.8%) | – | (4.1%) | (2.1%) | – | (1.8%) (13.5%) | – | (11.9%) | |
| Total amount recognised: | |||||||||
| Amount (£'000) | (15,676) | 67 | (15,609) | 8,429 | (2,972) | 5,457 | (3,311) | 654 | (2,657) |
| Percentage of present value of scheme liabilities | (10.9%) | 0.3% | (9.3%) | 6.3% | (12.2%) | 3.4% | (2.6%) | 3.8% | (1.8%) |
| 2008 | 2007 | ||||||||
| Difference between expected and actual return on scheme assets: | UK Overseas | Total | UK Overseas | Total | |||||
| Amount (£'000) | (28,968) | (94) (29,062) | (1,636) | (511) | (2,147) | ||||
| Percentage of scheme assets | (32.9%) | (0.5%) (27.4%) | (1.5%) | (3.5%) | (1.7%) | ||||
| Experience gains and losses on scheme liabilities: | |||||||||
| Amount (£'000) | 194 | (2,040) | (1,846) | (1,114) | (589) | (1,703) | |||
| Percentage of present value of scheme liabilities | 0.2% | (11.2%) | (1.4%) | (0.9%) | (4.4%) | (1.3%) | |||
| Effects to changes in assumptions underlying the present value of the scheme liabilities: |
|||||||||
| Amount (£'000) | 8,981 | – | 8,981 | 9,880 | – | 9,880 | |||
| Percentage of present value of scheme liabilities | 8.0% | – | 6.9% | 8.3% | – | 7.5% | |||
| Total amount recognised: | |||||||||
| Amount (£'000) | (19,793) | (2,134) (21,927) | 7,130 | (1,100) | 6,030 | ||||
| Percentage of present value of scheme liabilities | (17.7%) (11.7%) (16.9%) | 6.0% | (8.2%) | 4.6% |
The employer contributions to be paid to the UK defined benefit pension scheme for the year commencing 1 January 2012 is 19.0 per cent. of pensionable salary for active members up to 31 March 2012 and 19.8 per cent. thereafter plus £1,411,000 additional contribution to reduce the scheme's funding deficit.
| 2011 | 2010 | |
|---|---|---|
| £'000 | £'000 | |
| Authorised: 2,842,000 (2010: 2,842,000) ordinary shares of 10p each | 284 –––––––––– |
284 –––––––––– |
| Allotted, called up and fully paid: ordinary shares of 10p each: | ||
| At 1 January and 31 December – 2,842,000 (2010: 2,842,000) shares | 284 –––––––––– |
284 –––––––––– |
Group companies hold 62,500 issued shares in the company. These are classified as treasury shares.
| 2011 | 2010 | |
|---|---|---|
| £'000 | £'000 | |
| Group | ||
| Profit from operations | 53,406 | 67,883 |
| Share of associates' results | (6,862) | (3,814) |
| Depreciation and amortisation | 9,170 | 8,965 |
| Impairment of non-current assets | 180 | 615 |
| Gain arising from changes in fair value of biological assets | (7,320) | (11,111) |
| Profit on disposal of non-current assets | (698) | (4,662) |
| Loss/(profit) on transfer/disposal of an associate | 721 | (248) |
| Profit on disposal of investments | (178) | (182) |
| Increase in working capital | (7,542) | (1,526) |
| Pensions and similar provisions less payments | 160 | (8,482) |
| Biological assets capitalised cultivation costs | (7,326) | (6,412) |
| Biological assets decreases due to harvesting | 8,018 | 7,251 |
| Net decrease/(increase) in funds of banking subsidiaries | 2,546 –––––––––– |
(17,691) –––––––––– |
| 44,275 –––––––––– |
30,586 –––––––––– |
|
| 2011 | 2010 | |
|---|---|---|
| £'000 | £'000 | |
| Group | ||
| (Decrease)/increase in cash and cash equivalents in the year | (2,438) | 42,260 |
| Net cash outflow from decrease in debt | 460 –––––––––– |
7,516 –––––––––– |
| (Decrease)/increase in net cash resulting from cash flows | (1,978) | 49,776 |
| Exchange rate movements | (163) –––––––––– |
4,252 –––––––––– |
| (Decrease)/increase in net cash in the year | (2,141) | 54,028 |
| Net cash at beginning of year | 74,288 –––––––––– |
20,260 –––––––––– |
| Net cash at end of year | 72,147 –––––––––– |
74,288 –––––––––– |
There were no disposals in 2011. In 2010, the group disposed of its entire shareholding in Siegfried Holding AG, an associated undertaking.
Details of net assets disposed are as follows:
| 2011 | 2010 | |
|---|---|---|
| £'000 | £'000 | |
| Fair value of assets and liabilities: | ||
| Net effect of associate disposal | – –––––––––– |
48,506 –––––––––– |
| – –––––––––– |
48,506 –––––––––– |
|
| Satisfied by: | ||
| Cash consideration | – –––––––––– |
48,849 –––––––––– |
| Net inflow/(outflow) of cash in respect of disposal of businesses: | ||
| Cash consideration | – | 48,849 |
| Costs of disposal | – –––––––––– |
(95) –––––––––– |
| – | 48,754 | |
| –––––––––– | –––––––––– |
| Capital expenditure contracted for at the balance sheet date but not yet incurred is as follows: | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2011 | 2010 | |
| £'000 | £'000 | |
| Group | ||
| Property, plant and equipment | 1,800 | 1,761 |
| –––––––––– | –––––––––– |
The group leases land and buildings, plant and machinery under non-cancellable operating lease arrangements, which have various terms and renewal rights.
The future aggregate minimum lease payments under non-cancellable operating leases are as follows:
| 2011 | 2010 | |
|---|---|---|
| £'000 | £'000 | |
| Group | ||
| Land and buildings: | ||
| Within 1 year | 809 | 776 |
| Between 1 – 5 years | 2,602 | 2,717 |
| After 5 years | 13,315 –––––––––– |
14,440 –––––––––– |
| 16,726 –––––––––– |
17,933 –––––––––– |
|
| Plant and machinery: | ||
| Within 1 year | 124 | 253 |
| Between 1 – 5 years | 98 –––––––––– |
194 –––––––––– |
| 222 –––––––––– |
447 –––––––––– |
|
The group's most significant operating lease commitments are long term property leases with renewal terms in excess of 60 years.
Business interruption insurance is receivable for a period of three years from April 2010 in relation to a fire at Abbey Metal Finishing Company Limited and will be dependant on its trading performance.
The group operates in certain countries where its operations are potentially subject to a number of legal claims including taxation. When required, appropriate provisions are made for the expected cost of such claims. At 31 December 2011, the directors do not anticipate the outcome of any such claim to result in a material loss.
The group manages its capital to ensure that the group will be able to continue as a going concern, while maximising the return to stakeholders through the optimisation of its debt and equity balance. The capital structure of the group consists of debt, which includes the borrowings disclosed in note 27, cash and cash equivalents and equity attributable to equity holders of the parent, comprising issued capital, reserves and retained earnings.
The board reviews the capital structure, with an objective to ensure that gross borrowings as a percentage of tangible net assets does not exceed 50 per cent..
The ratio at the year end is as follows:
| 2011 | 2010 | |
|---|---|---|
| £'000 | £'000 | |
| Borrowings | 7,491 –––––––––– |
6,432 –––––––––– |
| Tangible net assets | 313,949 –––––––––– |
321,417 –––––––––– |
| Ratio | 2.39% –––––––––– |
2.00% –––––––––– |
Borrowings are defined as current and non-current borrowings, as detailed in note 27.
Tangible net assets includes all capital and reserves of the group attributable to equity holders of the parent less intangible assets.
| Carrying value | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2011 | 2010 | |
| £'000 | £'000 | |
| Financial assets | ||
| Cash and cash equivalents (excluding bank subsidiaries) | 79,638 | 80,720 |
| Loans and advances to banks by banking subsidiaries | 181,278 | 210,429 |
| Loans and advances to customers of banking subsidiaries | 36,512 | 38,108 |
| Trade and other receivables | 34,123 | 32,271 |
| Other investments | 34,374 –––––––––– |
30,497 –––––––––– |
| 365,925 –––––––––– |
392,025 –––––––––– |
|
| Financial liabilities | ||
| Amounts due to customers of banking subsidiaries | 199,797 | 227,998 |
| Trade and other payables | 42,605 | 40,772 |
| Borrowings | 7,491 | 6,432 |
| Provisions | 814 | 1,863 |
| Other non-current liabilities | 111 –––––––––– |
114 –––––––––– |
| 250,818 | 277,179 | |
| –––––––––– | –––––––––– |
Financial assets and liabilities, are subject to market variations in respect of price, exchange and interest rates. The group assesses fair values based on available market data and does not make use of valuation techniques.
The fair value of the group's financial assets and liabilities are not materially different to their carrying value.
The group finances its operations by a mixture of retained profits, bank borrowings, long-term loans and leases. The objective is to maintain a balance between continuity of funding and flexibility through the use of borrowings with a range of maturities. To achieve this, the maturity profile of borrowings and facilities are regularly reviewed. The group also seeks to maintain sufficient undrawn committed borrowing facilities to provide flexibility in the management of the group's liquidity.
Given the nature and diversity of the group's operations, the board does not believe a highly complex use of financial instruments would be of significant benefit to the group. However, where appropriate, the board does authorise the use of certain financial instruments to mitigate financial risks that face the group, where it is effective to do so.
Various financial instruments arise directly from the group's operations, for example cash and cash equivalents, trade receivables and trade payables. In addition, the group uses financial instruments for two main reasons, namely:
The group, including Duncan Lawrie, the group's banking subsidiary, did not, in accordance with group policy, trade in financial instruments throughout the period under review.
The group has no material exposure to foreign currency exchange risk on currencies other than the functional currencies of the operating entities, with the exception of significant Swiss Franc and Canadian Dollar cash deposits. A movement by 5 per cent. in the exchange rate of the Swiss Franc with Sterling would increase/decrease profit and net assets by £1,044,000 (2010: £1,829,000) and a movement by 5 per cent. in the exchange rate of the Canadian Dollar with Sterling would increase/decrease profit and net assets by £316,000 (2010: £nil).
Currency risks are primarily managed through the use of natural hedging and regularly reviewing when cash should be exchanged into either sterling or another functional currency.
The group is exposed to equity securities price risk because of investments held by the group and classified on the consolidated balance sheet as available-for-sale. To manage its price risk arising from investments in equity securities, the group diversifies its portfolio.
The majority of the group's equity investments are publicly traded and are quoted on stock exchanges located in Bermuda, Japan, Switzerland, UK and US. Should these equity indexes increase or decrease by 5 per cent. with all other variables held constant and all the group's equity instruments move accordingly, the group's equity balance would increase/decrease by £1,418,000 (2010: £1,251,000).
The group's exposure to commodity price risk is not significant.
The group's interest rate risk arises from interest-bearing assets and short and long-term borrowings. Borrowings issued at variable rates expose the group to cash flow interest rate risk. The group has no fixed rate exposure.
At 31 December 2011, if interest rates on non-sterling denominated interest-bearing assets and borrowings had been 50 basis points higher/lower with all other variables held constant, post-tax profit for the year would have been £303,000 (2010: £366,000) higher/lower.
At 31 December 2011, if interest rates on sterling denominated interest-bearing assets and borrowings had been 50 basis points higher/lower with all other variables held constant, post-tax profit for the year would have been £177,000 (2010: £135,000) higher/lower.
The interest rate exposure of the group's interest bearing assets and liabilities by currency, at 31 December was:
| Assets | Liabilities | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2011 | 2010 | 2011 | 2010 | ||
| £'000 | £'000 | £'000 | £'000 | ||
| Sterling | 162,044 | 152,646 | 126,665 | 125,704 | |
| US Dollar | 53,202 | 67,939 | 48,076 | 63,513 | |
| Euro | 19,220 | 29,997 | 19,952 | 30,699 | |
| Swiss Franc | 24,002 | 38,789 | 3,131 | 2,210 | |
| Kenyan Shilling | 20,478 | 15,653 | – | – | |
| Indian Rupee | 3,716 | 8,149 | 2,545 | 6 | |
| Malawi Kwacha | 203 | 752 | – | 177 | |
| Bangladesh Taka | 3,233 | 7,917 | 1,911 | 3,541 | |
| Australian Dollar | 678 | 5,202 | 682 | 5,199 | |
| South African Rand | 2,196 | 459 | 83 | 415 | |
| Brazilian Real | 2,956 | 3,259 | – | – | |
| Bermudian Dollar | 755 | 841 | – | – | |
| Canadian Dollar | 7,093 | 818 | 769 | 820 | |
| Japanese Yen | 1,767 | 1,650 | 1,761 | 1,649 | |
| Other | 1,714 –––––––––– |
499 –––––––––– |
1,713 –––––––––– |
497 –––––––––– |
|
| 303,257 | 334,570 | 207,288 | 234,430 | ||
| –––––––––– | –––––––––– | –––––––––– | –––––––––– |
The group has policies in place to limit its exposure to credit risk. Credit risk arises from cash and cash equivalents, deposits with banks and financial institutions, as well as credit exposures to customers, including outstanding receivables and committed transactions. If customers are independently rated, these ratings are used. Otherwise if there is no independent rating, management assesses the credit quality of the customer taking into account its financial position, past experience and other factors and if appropriate holding liens over stock and receiving payments in advance of services or goods as required. Management monitors the utilisation of credit limits regularly.
The group's approach to customer lending through the group's banking subsidiaries is risk averse with only 1.5 per cent. of the customer loan book being unsecured. Collateralised loans are normally secured against cash or property, with property loans being restricted to 70 per cent. of recent valuation although corporate or personal guarantees are also acceptable in some instances.
The group has a large number of trade receivables, the largest five receivables at the year end comprise 24 per cent. (2010: 18 per cent.) of total trade receivables.
Ultimate responsibility for liquidity risk management rests with the board of directors. The group manages liquidity risk by maintaining adequate reserves and banking facilities by continuously monitoring forecast and actual cash flows and managing the maturity profiles of financial assets and liabilities.
The two subsidiary companies which are engaged in banking activities, Duncan Lawrie Limited and Duncan Lawrie (IOM) Limited both have restrictions contained in their memorandum and articles of association which place a ceiling on their levels of customer lending. Such restrictions effectively limit the customer loan book to the value of the share capital and reserves of each banking subsidiary. This fact, in conjunction with the general matching of maturing customer deposits with market placements and the general use of liquid assets such as certificates of deposit, results in significantly reduced liquidity risk for Duncan Lawrie and the group.
At 31 December 2011, the group had undrawn committed facilities of £24,943,000 (2010: £31,422,000), all of which are due to be reviewed within one year.
The table below analyses the group's financial assets and liabilities which will be settled on a net basis into relevant maturity groupings based on the remaining period at the balance sheet date to the contractual maturity date. The amounts disclosed are the contractual undiscounted cash flows.
| Less than | Between 1 | Between 2 | Over | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 year | and 2 years | and 5 years | 5 years | Undated | Total | |
| £'000 | £'000 | £'000 | £'000 | £'000 | £'000 | |
| At 31 December 2011 | ||||||
| Assets | ||||||
| Cash and cash equivalents (excluding | ||||||
| bank subsidiaries) | 79,638 | – | – | – | – | 79,638 |
| Loans and advances to banks by banking | ||||||
| subsidiaries | 181,056 | – | – | – | 222 | 181,278 |
| Loans and advances to customers of | ||||||
| banking subsidiaries | 16,246 | 5,116 | 6,997 | 823 | 7,330 | 36,512 |
| Trade and other receivables | 33,156 | 967 | – | – | – | 34,123 |
| Other investments | 5,829 | – | – | – | 28,545 | 34,374 |
| –––––––– | –––––––– | –––––––– | –––––––– | –––––––– | –––––––– | |
| 315,925 –––––––– |
6,083 –––––––– |
6,997 –––––––– |
823 –––––––– |
36,097 –––––––– |
365,925 –––––––– |
|
| Liabilities | ||||||
| Deposits by banks at banking | ||||||
| subsidiaries | 1,024 | 1,800 | 900 | – | – | 3,724 |
| Customer accounts held at banking | ||||||
| subsidiaries | 191,050 | 1,706 | 2,423 | 823 | 71 | 196,073 |
| Trade and other payables | 42,605 | – | – | – | – | 42,605 |
| Borrowings | 7,310 | 72 | 79 | 30 | – | 7,491 |
| Provisions | 214 | 150 | 450 | – | – | 814 |
| Other non-current liabilities | – | – | – | 111 | – | 111 |
| –––––––– 242,203 |
–––––––– 3,728 |
–––––––– 3,852 |
–––––––– 964 |
–––––––– 71 |
–––––––– 250,818 |
|
| –––––––– | –––––––– | –––––––– | –––––––– | –––––––– | –––––––– | |
| At 31 December 2010 | ||||||
| Assets | ||||||
| Cash and cash equivalents (excluding | ||||||
| bank subsidiaries) | 80,720 | – | – | – | – | 80,720 |
| Loans and advances to banks by banking | ||||||
| subsidiaries | 210,170 | – | – | – | 259 | 210,429 |
| Loans and advances to customers of | ||||||
| banking subsidiaries | 21,380 | 11,062 | 2,461 | 3,098 | 107 | 38,108 |
| Trade and other receivables | 31,134 | 1,137 | – | – | – | 32,271 |
| Other investments | 5,313 –––––––– |
– –––––––– |
– –––––––– |
– –––––––– |
25,184 –––––––– |
30,497 –––––––– |
| 348,717 | 12,199 | 2,461 | 3,098 | 25,550 | 392,025 | |
| Liabilities | –––––––– | –––––––– | –––––––– | –––––––– | –––––––– | –––––––– |
| Deposits by banks at banking | ||||||
| subsidiaries | 2,507 | – | 800 | – | – | 3,307 |
| Customer accounts held at banking | ||||||
| subsidiaries | 215,742 | 6,263 | 1,666 | 915 | 105 | 224,691 |
| Trade and other payables | 40,772 | – | – | – | – | 40,772 |
| Borrowings | 5,990 | 252 | 140 | 50 | – | 6,432 |
| Provisions | 1,113 | 150 | 600 | – | – | 1,863 |
| Other non-current liabilities | – | – | – | 114 | – | 114 |
| –––––––– | –––––––– | –––––––– | –––––––– | –––––––– | –––––––– | |
| 266,124 –––––––– |
6,665 –––––––– |
3,206 –––––––– |
1,079 –––––––– |
105 –––––––– |
277,179 –––––––– |
Included in loans and advances to banks by banking subsidiaries repayable in less than 1 year is £133,642,000 (2010: £54,726,000) repayable on demand and £47,414,000 (2010: £155,444,000) repayable within 3 months.
Included in loans and advances to customers of banking subsidiaries repayable in less than 1 year is £7,952,000 (2010: £5,703,000) repayable on demand, £5,137,000 (2010: £4,237,000) repayable within 3 months and £3,157,000 (2010: £11,440,000) repayable between 3 and 12 months.
Included in other investments repayable in less than 1 year is £5,829,000 (2010: £5,313,000) repayable between 3 and 12 months.
Included in deposits by banks at banking subsidiaries repayable in less than 1 year is £459,000 (2010: £nil) repayable on demand, £355,000 (2010: £802,000) repayable within 3 months and £210,000 (2010: £1,705,000) repayable between 3 and 12 months.
Included in customer accounts held at banking subsidiaries repayable in less than 1 year is £130,695,000 (2010: £80,046,000) repayable on demand, £55,041,000 (2010: £129,240,000) repayable within 3 months and £5,314,000 (2010: £6,456,000) repayable between 3 and 12 months.
Included in borrowings in less than 1 year is £7,012,000 (2010: £5,447,000) repayable on demand.
The principal operating subsidiary undertakings of the group at 31 December 2011, which are wholly owned and incorporated in Great Britain unless otherwise stated, were:
| of operation | |
|---|---|
| Agriculture and horticulture | |
| Amgoorie India Limited (Incorporated in India – 99.8 per cent. holding) | India |
| C.C. Lawrie Comércio e Participacões Ltda. (Incorporated in Brazil) | Brazil |
| Eastern Produce Cape (Pty) Limited (Incorporated in South Africa) | South Africa |
| Eastern Produce Kenya Limited (Incorporated in Kenya – 70.0 per cent. holding) | Kenya |
| Eastern Produce Malawi Limited (Incorporated in Malawi – 73.2 per cent. holding) | Malawi |
| Eastern Produce South Africa (Pty) Limited (Incorporated in South Africa – 73.2 per cent. holding) | South Africa |
| Goodricke Group Limited (Incorporated in India – 79.2 per cent. holding) | India |
| Horizon Farms (An United States of America general partnership – 80.0 per cent. holding) | USA |
| Kakuzi Limited (Incorporated in Kenya – 50.7 per cent. holding) | Kenya |
| Koomber Tea Company Limited (Incorporated in India) | India |
| Longbourne Holdings Limited | Bangladesh |
| Siret Tea Company Limited (Incorporated in Kenya – 50.5 per cent. owned by Kakuzi Limited) | Kenya |
| Stewart Holl (India) Limited (Incorporated in India – 92.0 per cent. holding) | India |
| Engineering | |
| Abbey Metal Finishing Company Limited | UK |
| AJT Engineering Limited | UK |
| AKD Engineering Limited | UK |
| AKD Engineering Limited | UK |
|---|---|
| British Metal Treatments Limited | UK |
| GU Cutting and Grinding Services Limited | UK |
| Loddon Engineering Limited | UK |
Principal country
| Subsidiary undertakings (continued) | |
|---|---|
| Principal country of operation |
|
| Food storage and distribution | |
| Affish BV (Incorporated in The Netherlands) | The Netherlands |
| Associated Cold Stores & Transport Limited | UK |
| Wylax International BV (Incorporated in The Netherlands) | The Netherlands |
| Trading and agency | |
| Linton Park Services Limited | UK |
| Robertson Bois Dickson Anderson Limited | UK |
| Banking and financial services | |
| Duncan Lawrie Limited | UK |
| Duncan Lawrie Asset Management Limited | UK |
| Duncan Lawrie Holdings Limited | UK |
| Duncan Lawrie (IOM) Limited (Incorporated in Isle of Man) | Isle of Man |
| Investment holding | |
| Affish Limited | UK |
| Assam Dooars Investments Limited | UK |
| Associated Fisheries Limited | UK |
| Bordure Limited | UK |
| John Ingham & Sons Limited | UK |
| Lawrie (Bermuda) Limited (Incorporated in Bermuda) | Bermuda |
| Lawrie Group Plc (Owned directly by the company) | UK |
| Lawrie International Limited (Incorporated in Bermuda) | Bermuda |
| Linton Park Plc (Owned directly by the company) | UK |
| Unochrome Industries Limited | UK |
| Western Dooars Investments Limited | UK |
The principal associated undertakings of the group at 31 December 2011 were:
| Group | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| interest | |||
| Principal | in equity | ||
| country of | Accounting | capital | |
| operation | date 2011 | per cent. | |
| Insurance and leasing | |||
| BF&M Limited (Incorporated in Bermuda – common stock) | Bermuda 31 December | 25.1 | |
| United Insurance Company Limited | |||
| (Incorporated in Bangladesh – ordinary shares) | Bangladesh 31 December | 37.0 | |
| United Leasing Company Limited | |||
| (Incorporated in Bangladesh – ordinary shares) | Bangladesh 31 December | 38.4 |
Camellia Holding AG holds 1,427,000 ordinary shares of Camellia Plc (representing 51.34 per cent. of the total voting rights). Camellia Holding AG is owned by The Camellia Private Trust Company Limited, a private trust company incorporated under the laws of Bermuda as trustee of The Camellia Foundation ("the Foundation"). The Foundation is a Bermudian trust, the income of which is utilised for charitable, educational and humanitarian causes at the discretion of the trustees.
The activities of Camellia Plc and its group (the "Camellia Group") are conducted independently of the Foundation and, other than Mr M Dünki and Mr D A Reeves who are directors of The Camellia Private Trust Company Limited and act as trustees of the Foundation, none of the directors of Camellia Plc are connected with The Camellia Private Trust Company Limited or the Foundation. While The Camellia Private Trust Company Limited as a Trustee of the Foundation maintains its rights as a shareholder, it has not participated in, and has confirmed to the board of Camellia Plc that it has no intention of participating in, the day to day running of the business of the Camellia Group. The Camellia Private Trust Company Limited has also confirmed its agreement that where any director of Camellia Plc is for the time being connected with the Foundation, he should not exercise any voting rights as a director of Camellia Plc in relation to any matter concerning the Camellia Group's interest in any assets in which the Foundation also has a material interest otherwise than through Camellia Plc.
We have audited the financial statements of Camellia Plc for the year ended 31 December 2011 which comprise the Consolidated income statement, the Group and Parent Company Statements of comprehensive income, the Consolidated and Parent Company balance sheets, the Consolidated and Parent Company cash flow statements, the Group and Parent Company Statement of Changes in Equity and the related notes. The financial reporting framework that has been applied in their preparation is applicable law and International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRSs) as adopted by the European Union and, as regards the parent company financial statements, as applied in accordance with the provisions of the Companies Act 2006.
As explained more fully in the Statement of directors' responsibilities set out on page 17, the directors are responsible for the preparation of the financial statements and for being satisfied that they give a true and fair view. Our responsibility is to audit and express an opinion on the financial statements in accordance with applicable law and International Standards on Auditing (UK and Ireland). Those standards require us to comply with the Auditing Practices Board's Ethical Standards for Auditors.
This report, including the opinions, has been prepared for and only for the company's members as a body in accordance with Chapter 3 of Part 16 of the Companies Act 2006 and for no other purpose. We do not, in giving these opinions, accept or assume responsibility for any other purpose or to any other person to whom this report is shown or into whose hands it may come save where expressly agreed by our prior consent in writing.
An audit involves obtaining evidence about the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements sufficient to give reasonable assurance that the financial statements are free from material misstatement, whether caused by fraud or error. This includes an assessment of whether: the accounting policies are appropriate to the group's and the parent company's circumstances and have been consistently applied and adequately disclosed; the reasonableness of significant accounting estimates made by the directors; and the overall presentation of the financial statements. In addition, we read all the financial and non-financial information in the Camellia Plc Report and accounts 2011 to identify material inconsistencies with the audited financial statements. If we become aware of any apparent material misstatements or inconsistencies we consider the implications for our report.
In our opinion:
In our opinion:
We have nothing to report in respect of the following:
Under the Companies Act 2006 we are required to report to you if, in our opinion:
Under the Listing Rules we are required to review:
John Waters (Senior Statutory Auditor) for and on behalf of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP Chartered Accountants and Statutory Auditors London
26 April 2012
Legislation in the United Kingdom governing the preparation and dissemination of financial statements may differ from legislation in other jurisdictions.
| 2011 £'000 |
2010 £'000 |
2009 £'000 |
2008 £'000 |
2007 £'000 |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue – continuing operations | 246,849 | 251,181 | 230,270 | 190,551 | 161,936 |
| Profit before tax | –––––––––– 58,650 |
–––––––––– 73,141 |
–––––––––– 34,143 |
–––––––––– 24,040 |
–––––––––– 30,651 |
| Taxation | (16,860) | (22,107) | (11,702) | (7,547) | (3,205) |
| Profit from continuing operations | –––––––––– 41,790 –––––––––– |
–––––––––– 51,034 –––––––––– |
–––––––––– 22,441 –––––––––– |
–––––––––– 16,493 –––––––––– |
–––––––––– 27,446 –––––––––– |
| Profit attributable to equity shareholders | 33,086 –––––––––– |
41,984 –––––––––– |
15,897 –––––––––– |
11,044 –––––––––– |
25,317 –––––––––– |
| Equity dividends paid | 3,057 –––––––––– |
2,891 –––––––––– |
2,557 –––––––––– |
2,557 –––––––––– |
2,502 –––––––––– |
| Equity | |||||
| Called up share capital | 284 | 284 | 284 | 284 | 284 |
| Reserves | 321,308 | 329,209 | 293,570 | 303,816 | 265,987 |
| Total shareholders' funds | –––––––––– 321,592 –––––––––– |
–––––––––– 329,493 –––––––––– |
–––––––––– 293,854 –––––––––– |
–––––––––– 304,100 –––––––––– |
–––––––––– 266,271 –––––––––– |
| Earnings per share | 1,190.4p | 1,510.5p | 571.9p | 397.3p | 910.8p |
| Dividend paid per share | 110p | 104p | 92p | 92p | 90p |
Building tools?
Free accounts include 100 API calls/year for testing.
Have a question? We'll get back to you promptly.