Interim / Quarterly Report • Aug 18, 2011
Interim / Quarterly Report
Open in ViewerOpens in native device viewer
Press release Requlated Information
| Group production | ||
|---|---|---|
| In tonnes | Own | Third Parties |
Total 1H11 |
$B.I.*$ 1H11 |
Own | Third Parties |
Total 1H 10 |
B.I.* 1H10 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Palm Oil | 96 335 | 26 176 | 122 511 | 96 824 | 86 516 | 21 7 22 | 108 238 | 85 290 |
| Rubber | 4 702 | 522 | 5 2 2 4 | 4 5 5 4 | 5 4 0 9 | 572 | 5981 | 4972 |
| Tea | 1 292 | 0 | 292 | 1 193 | 1610 | $\mathbf 0$ | 1610 | 1 184 |
| Bananas | 10 3 65 | 0 | 10 365 | 10 365 | 10 983 | $\mathbf 0$ | 10 983 | 10 983 |
Beneficial Interest: share of the group
Thanks to substantially better weather conditions than last year and to a higher degree of maturity of the planted areas, the increasing volumes in Agro Muko in the province of Bengkulu in Indonesia (+21.2%) and in Hargy Oil Palms in Papua New Guinea (+18.1%) has ensured that the group production of palm oil increased by 13.2% compared to the first semester of 2010. In the mature plantations of North Sumatra we follow the generally negative trend, triggered by La Niña at the start of the year, which led to a drop of 6.0% in the palm oil production during the first half of the year. The oil extraction rates of the various mills were satisfactory and reached on average 23.7% for the group.
Notwithstanding rising volumes in Agro Muko (+18.7%) the exceptionally good rubber production of last year could not be matched in the other areas of Sumatra. Early shedding of the leaves, a temporary halt to the stimulation of the rubber trees in South Sumatra and a change in the timing of the production process in Papua New Guinea, have resulted in a drop of production for the group of 12.7% compared to the same period as last year.
The tea garden at Cibuni in Java-Indonesia was covered practically the whole of the first semester by a thick layer of clouds. This lack of sunshine led to a drop in production of 19.7%. It's only since June that we have registered an improvement.
The banana production in the Ivory Coast suffered in the second quarter of the effects of the politically unstable situation. This hampered both transport and export activities and this resulted in a drop of 5.6% in our banana production and exports.
| Average market prices | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| in USD/tonne* | First 6 months 2011 | First 6 months 2010 | |
| Palm oil | CIF Rotterdam | 1 199 | 810 |
| Rubber | RSS3 FOB Singapore | 5 517 | 3 457 |
| Tea | FOB origin | 2 940 | 2 777 |
| Bananas | FOT Europe | 1 251 | 1 025 |
After the tightness that led to a peak in vegetable oil prices during February 2011 the supply side started to improve and prices eased back. We not only saw palm oil production improve from March onwards but it also turned out that South American soy bean crops were larger than expected. The USDA reported at the end of June that high prices had encouraged US farmers to plant more corn and soy beans and after last year's bad crops in Russia and the Ukraine these countries boosted the production of sunflower seeds. As a result vegetable oil prices have been easing, but we did not see a sharp correction in prices and the main reason for that was the growing demand from the biodiesel sector.
More favourable weather conditions over the rubber growing areas during the second quarter and concerns in China about an overheating of their economy dominated the rubber market. The Chinese authorities tightened monetary conditions and this allowed for rubber prices to ease back from the highs they had reached in February.
The lack of rains over the tea growing areas in Kenya kept prices, during the second quarter, in a tight range close to the prices seen during the period January to March.
The good price level of bananas in the first quarter was not sustained from May onwards in a nervous European market that is seasonably weaker during the summer period.
| 30/06/2011 | 30/06/2010 | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| In KUSD | Before IAS 41 |
IAS41 | IFRS | Before IAS 41 |
IAS41 | IFRS |
| Revenue | 177 100 | 177 100 | 127 967 | 127 967 | ||
| Cost of sales | -105 995 | 2 001 | -103 994 | -77 617 | 1 794 | -75 823 |
| Gross profit | 71 105 | 2 001 | 73 106 | 50 350 | 1 794 | 52 144 |
| Variation biological assets | 17 984 | 17 984 | 10 465 | 10 465 | ||
| Planting cost (net) Selling, general and administrative |
-7 466 | -7 466 | -4 765 | -4 765 | ||
| expenses | -12 028 | -12 028 | -9 619 | -9 619 | ||
| Other operating income/(charges) | 148 | 148 | -1 790 | -1 790 | ||
| Operating result | 59 225 | 12 519 | 71 744 | 38 941 | 7 494 | 46 435 |
| Financial income | 458 | 458 | 248 | 248 | ||
| Financial charges | - 380 | - 380 | - 574 | - 574 | ||
| Exchange differences | 5 023 | 5 023 | -3 100 | -3 100 | ||
| Financial result | 5 101 | 5 101 | -3 426 | -3 426 | ||
| Profit before tax | 64 326 | 12 519 | 76 845 | 35 515 | 7 494 | 43 009 |
| Tax expense | -11 199 | -3 210 | -14 409 | -9 562 | -1 298 | -10 860 |
| Profit after tax | 53 127 | 9 309 | 62 436 | 25 953 | 6 196 | 32 149 |
| Share of results of associated companies (insurance) |
- 170 | - 170 | 3 183 | 3 183 | ||
| Result from continuing operations | 52 957 | 9 309 | 62 266 | 29 136 | 6 196 | 35 332 |
| Profit for the period | 52 957 | 9 309 | 62 266 | 29 136 | 6 196 | 35 332 |
| Equity holders of the parent | 49 854 | 8 115 | 57 969 | 27 165 | 5 548 | 32 713 |
| In KUSD (condensed) | 30/06/2011 | % | 30/06/2010 | % |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Palm | 54 079 | 76.0 | 35 538 | 70.5 |
| Rubber | 13 975 | 19.7 | 10 259 | 20.4 |
| Tea | 904 | 1.3 | 2 063 | 4.1 |
| Bananas and plants | 1 158 | 1.6 | 1 600 | 3.2 |
| Corporate and others | 989 | 1.4 | 890 | 1.8 |
| 71 105 | 100.0 | 50 350 | 100.0 |
Rising palm oil production sold at substantially higher prices was the main reason for an increase in turnover of 38.4% compared to the same period last year.
The cost of production denominated in US dollars was mainly influenced by the combined effect of stronger local currencies and inflation that drove up the cost of labour in Indonesia and Papua New Guinea. The cost of sales was also higher as a result of the export tax levied by the Indonesian government on palm oil, which was on average USD 237 per tonne for the first half of the year as compared to USD 43 per tonne for the whole of 2010.
The gross profit rose by 41.2% in which the share of palm oil grew to 76.0%. The gross profit on rubber increased notwithstanding the slight drop in volumes. The margins on tea came under pressure due to lower volumes and the high labour intensity of this activity.
The other operating charges were affected in 2010 by the non-recurrent depreciation on the CSM estate, that no longer fits in our sustainability policy and by the sale of the Brazilian assets. In 2011 the other operating income is limited to smaller capital gains on the sales of assets in the estates.
Taking these non-recurrent elements into account, the operating result before IAS41 increased by 52.1% as compared to the same period last year.
The consistent application of the hedging policy for all expected payments in other currencies than the US dollar, mainly the quarterly hedging of the euros for dividends and also for the public offering for the Jabelmalux shares, form the basis for a positive exchange difference.
The average tax expense that should amount to 26.7% was favourably affected by deferred tax calculations on timing differences in valuation of non-monetary assets in the US dollar consolidation and in the local accounts (explanatory note 2.2.7. Income taxes).
The participation in the insurance sector focuses on the core activities marine and general risk insurance. The recurrent results suffered from temporary lower technical results and the restructuring costs made the net share in the associated participations slightly negative. The contribution for 2010 was positively affected by capital gains (KUSD 2 578) on the sale of activities in the Netherlands and in Belgium.
The profit for the period, without taking into account the movements related to IAS41, amounts to KUSD 52 957 and is 81.8% higher than the same period last year and is again a record figure for SIPEF.
The IAS41 adjustment consists of substituting the depreciation charge in the cost of sales with the variation in "fair value" of the biological assets between end 2010 and the end of June 2011, less planting costs and associated deferred tax charges. The gross variation of biological asset amounted to KUSD 17 984 and arose mainly from the expansion and the increase in maturity of the newly planted areas of our UMW estate in Indonesia and of Hargy Oil Palms in Papua New Guinea, as well as the rise in the long term averages of the palm oil, rubber and tea prices. Planting costs of KUSD 7 466 reduce the net impact before taxes to KUSD 12 519, which is the basis for the average deferred tax calculation of 25.6%. The net positive IAS41 impact, share of the group, amounts to KUSD 8 115 and is, mainly by the variation in long term averages, the growing maturity of the young plantings and the future prospects of rubber, substantially higher than the KUSD 5 548 of last year.
The net IFRS result, share of the group, IAS41 adjustments included, amounts to KUSD 57 969 and is 77.2% higher than that of the first semester of last year.
| In KUSD (condensed) | 30/06/2011 | 30/06/2010 |
|---|---|---|
| Cash flow from operating activities | 72 863 | 44 927 |
| Change in net working capital | -26 284 | -3 490 |
| Income taxes paid | -12 914 | -10 478 |
| Cash flow from operating activities after tax | 33 665 | 30 959 |
| Acquisitions intangible and tangible assets | -20 730 | -15 479 |
| Acquisitions financial assets | -17 979 | -5 989 |
| Operating free cash flow | -5 044 | 9 491 |
| Proceeds from sale of assets | 696 | 1 862 |
| Free cash flow | -4 348 | 11 353 |
| In USD per share | 30/06/2011 | 30/06/2010 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Weighted average shares outstanding | 8 951 740 | 8 951 740 | |
| Basic operating result | 8.01 | 5.19 | |
| Basic/Diluted net earnings * | 6.48 | 3.65 | |
| Operating free cash flow | -0.56 | 1.06 |
The cash flow from operating activities rose by 62.2% compared to the same period as last year. These substantially better prices had their effect on inventories and on outstanding trade receivables, it was a larger inventory of palm oil at the end of June still to be shipped that increased the requirement of working capital. The taxes paid are in line with the profit earned in previous years.
The investments comprise, besides replacement investments, the development cost for the replanting and expansion of the oil palm and rubber areas in Papua New Guinea and Indonesia as well as for the improvement of the logistics and the infrastructure of the estates. Because of the new planting procedures established by the RSPO the formalities to start planting in the Bengkulu Province and also in Papua New Guinea have not been completed. The expansion shall now mainly take place during the second semester so as per the end of June only 983 hectares of new oil palms have been planted.
The investments in financial assets cover exclusively the acquisition of 19.7% of Jabelmalux SA so that the group now owns 97.1% of the shares and on the 24th of June the company was delisted from the Luxemburg Stock Exchange. Through this acquisition the SIPEF group now owns an additional share (2 657 hectares) in the oil palm estate of the UMW project and in the rubber estate and tea gardens of Melania.
| In KUSD (condensed) | 30/06/2011 | 31/12/2010 |
|---|---|---|
| Biological assets (depreciated costs) | 100 297 | 92 572 |
| Revaluation | 157 722 | 145 122 |
| Biological assets (IAS41) | 258 019 | 237 694 |
| Other fixed assets | 126 272 | 117 842 |
| Net assets held for sale | 0 | 2 113 |
| Net current assets, net of cash | 44 647 | 39 641 |
| Net cash position | 52 341 | 56 484 |
| Total net assets | 481 279 | 453 774 |
| Shareholders' equity, group share | 395 558 | 368 549 |
| Non controlling interest | 25 974 | 27 240 |
| Provisions and deferred tax liabilities | 59 747 | 57 985 |
| Total net liabilities | 481 279 | 453 774 |
The continued expansion of the estates in Indonesia and Papua New Guinea and an increase in the fair value of the planted areas of oil palm, rubber and tea, has led to a further increase in the biological assets that now amount to KUSD 258 019.
The negotiations that were started with potential buyers of the CSM oil palm estate in North Sumatra, that no longer fits in the sustainability strategy of the group, did not lead to a sale, upon which is was decided to temporarily reincorporate the project at its estimated sales value in the assets of the group. Protective operational measures have been taken to make the project saleable again.
The dividends approved by shareholders but payable in July amounting to KUSD 19 657 largely compensated the increased requirement of working capital.
There are up to now no signs of additional disruptions in the production of oil palm, rubber and tea, so that we expect that the current trend shall continue till year end. We count on a slight improvement in the production of oil palm and a slight decrease in rubber and tea.
At the moment there are quite a few uncertainties affecting the price setting of vegetable oils: the Eurozone sovereign debt crisis and the debt crisis in the US on the one hand and the dry and hot weather situation affecting the US soy and corn plantings on the other. Fundamentally prices should ease on the back of growing stocks of vegetable oils, but cheaper palm oil prices will attract more demand and therefore any downward correction will most probably be short-lived.
The slower rubber off-take in China has been offset by better demand in Europe and recent projections of a continued tight situation between supply and demand should give fresh support to rubber prices.
Tea prices should remain steady over the next few months as we see little or no relief on the production side in Kenya.
The commercial annual sales contracts for bananas with added value protect us against the volatility of the market. The second half of the year usually stands for a steadier demand and so an increase in production in the Ivory Coast should allow us to partially make up for the damages following the post-election turmoil.
Taking into account the production and price expectations for the balance of the year, and knowing that we currently have sold respectively 83% and 72% of the palm oil and rubber production at an average price of USD 1 150 per tonne CIF Rotterdam and USD 4 477 per tonne FOB, our expected profit will move towards a recurring result that should exceed that of 2010, notwithstanding the uncertainty linked to the Indonesian export tax and the generally rising cost of production brought about by a weak US dollar versus local currencies.
The previously announced potential expansion of our activities through 3 new projects in South Sumatra continues. A first license for 10 500 hectares for the planting of oil palm and rubber was received from the authorities on 18 July; from this 8 400 hectares will be developed as an industrial project by SIPEF and 2 100 hectares shall be reserved for the local communities. This first license allows us, over a period of 3 years and against compensation, the possibility to acquire from the land owners the right to operate the concessions. In the next few months we should find out how many land owners wish to follow us. The 2 other projects are still in the phase of negotiations with the authorities to obtain a similar first license.
SIPEF is a Belgian agro-industrial company listed on NYSE Euronext Brussels. The condensed financial statements of the group for the six months ended June 30, 2011 were authorised for issue by the board of directors on August 17, 2011.
This report presents interim condensed consolidated financial statements and has been prepared using accounting policies consistent with International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS). These financial statements are presented in accordance with International Accounting Standard IAS 34, "Interim Financial Reporting". This report should be read in conjunction with SIPEF group's annual financial statements as at December 31, 2010, because the financial statements herein do not include all the information and disclosures required in the annual financial statements. The accounting policies applied are consistent with those applied in SIPEF group's 2010 consolidated financial statements.
SIPEF group did not apply early adoption of any new IFRS standards or interpretations which were issued at the date of authorization of these interim condensed financial statements but not yet effective at the balance sheet date.
The interim condensed consolidated financial statements have been subject to a limited review by our statutory auditor.
At the end of the voluntary public offer for the shares of Jabelmalux SA, SIPEF acquired an additional participation (+19.7%) for an amount of KUSD 17 979. This transaction was directly recorded in the group reserves (KUSD -12 351) and in the non-controlling interests (KUSD -5 628).
On the other hand the scope has been extended by 3 newly established 95% owned subsidiaries: PT Agro Rawas Ulu, PT Agro Muara Rupit and PT Agro Kati Lama.
See annex 5.
The company CSM was transferred to "assets held for sale" in our December 2010 balance sheet and was impaired by KUSD 3 694 to the expected sales price. As we do not expect PT CSM to be sold within a year, the assets were taken up again in the appropriate line items of the balance sheet. The impairment was assigned to the intangible assets and property, plant & equipment.
There were no changes in transactions with related parties compared to the previous annual report.
As recorded earlier and as it appears from the table below the average rate of taxation depends to a large extent on the tax impact on variations in the valuation of non-monetary assets in functional currencies and in local currencies in Indonesia and Papua New Guinea.
| June 2011 | June 2010 | |
|---|---|---|
| Profit before tax | 76 845 | 43 009 |
| -26.74% | -26.53% | |
| Theoretical tax rate | -20 550 | -11 413 |
| Variation % | 0 | 0 |
| Withholding tax on dividends Deferred tax on non-current assets (functional currency / |
-47 | -194 |
| local) | 6 114 | 1 267 |
| Exchange result USD | 580 | -3 508 |
| Others | -506 | 2 988 |
| Tax expense | -14 409 -18.75% |
-10 860 -25.26% |
In order to allow the reader to have a better understanding of the impact of the tax charge on the group at the year end 2011 we have drawn up a sensitivity analyses that reflects the impact of a variation in the Indonesian rupiah (IDR) and the PNG kina (PGK) on the tax charge.
| 5% devaluation | 31/12/2010 | 5% revaluation | |
|---|---|---|---|
| IDR | 9 441 | 8 991 | 8 541 |
| PGK | 2.7416 | 2.611 | 2.4805 |
| Indo | -1 296 | 0 | 1 438 |
|---|---|---|---|
| PNG | -1 404 | 0 | 1 542 |
| Total | -2 700 | 0 | 2 980 |
On June 8, 2011, SIPEF's shareholders approved the distribution of a EUR 1.50 gross dividend for 2010, payable as from July 6, 2011.
There are no events after balance sheet date that have a significant impact on the results and/or the shareholders' equity of the group.
2.2.10. Risks
In accordance with Article 13 of the Royal Decree of November 14, 2007, SIPEF group states that the fundamental risks confronting the company are unchanged from those described in the 2010 annual report. On a regular basis, the board of directors and company management evaluate the business risks that confront the SIPEF group.
Baron Bracht, chairman of the board of directors, and François Van Hoydonck, managing director confirm that to the best of their knowledge:
See annex 7. .
Schoten, August 18, 2011.
For more information, please contact:
* F. Van Hoydonck, managing director (mobile +32/478.92.92.82)
* J. Nelis, chief financial officer
Tel.: 0032/3.641.97.00 Fax : 0032/3.646.57.05
mail to : [email protected] website www.sipef.com (section "investor relations")
SIPEF is a Belgian agro-industrial company listed on NYSE Euronext Brussels. The company mainly holds majority stakes in tropical businesses, which it manages and operates. The group is geographically diversified, and produces a number of different commodities, principally palm oil. Its investments are largely ventures in developing countries.
| Consolidated statement of financial position | ANNEX 1 | |
|---|---|---|
| In KUSD | 30/06/2011 | 31/12/2010 |
| Non-current assets | 385 020 | 355 565 |
| Intangible assets | 22 484 | 20 251 |
| Biological assets | 258 019 | 237 694 |
| Property, plant & equipment | 89 365 | 83 815 |
| Investment property | 3 | 3 |
| Financial assets | 14 370 | 13 628 |
| Investments in associates | 10 200 | 9 589 |
| Other investments | 0 | 0 |
| Other financial assets | 4 170 | 4 039 |
| Receivables > 1 year | 779 | 174 |
| Other receivables | 50 | 145 |
| Deferred tax assets | 729 | 29 |
| Current assets | 163 346 | 144 991 |
| Inventories | 44 372 | 29 846 |
| Trade and other receivables | 54 225 | 45 872 |
| Trade receivables | 32 748 | 26 439 |
| Other receivables | 21 477 | 19 433 |
| Investments | 25 452 | 15 582 |
| Other investments and deposits | 25 452 | 15 582 |
| Derivatives | 0 | 0 |
| Cash and cash equivalents | 32 612 | 49 025 |
| Other current assets | 6 685 | 2 085 |
| Assets held for sale | 0 | 2 581 |
| Total assets | 548 366 0 |
500 556 0 |
| Total equity | 421 532 | 395 789 |
| Shareholders' equity | 395 558 | 368 549 |
| Issued capital | 45 819 | 45 819 |
| Share premium | 21 502 | 21 502 |
| Reserves | 342 094 | 316 133 |
| Translation differences | -13 857 | -14 905 |
| Non-controlling interests | 25 974 | 27 240 |
| Non-current liabilities | 60 476 | 60 614 |
| Provisions > 1 year | 49 062 | 47 623 |
| Provisions | 124 | 115 |
| Deferred tax liabilities | 48 938 | 47 508 |
| Trade and other debts > 1 year | 0 | |
| Financial liabilities > 1 year (incl. derivatives) | 0 | 2 600 |
| Pension liabilities | 11 414 | 10 391 |
| Current liabilities | 66 358 | 44 153 |
| Trade and other debts < 1 year | 55 777 | 33 177 |
| Trade payables | 12 184 | 9 195 |
| Advances received | 508 | 286 |
| Other payables | 29 790 | 8 422 |
| Income taxes | 13 295 | 15 274 |
| 5 976 | 5 691 | |
| 5 199 | 5 200 | |
| Financial liabilities < 1 year Current portion of amounts payable after one year |
323 | |
| Financial obligations | 524 | |
| Derivatives | 253 | 168 |
| Other current liabilities | 4 605 | 4 817 |
| Liabilities associated with assets held for sale | 0 | 468 |
| 30/06/2011 | 30/06/2010 | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Before | Before | |||||
| IAS 41 | IAS41 | IFRS | IAS 41 | IAS41 | IFRS | |
| In KUSD | ||||||
| Revenue | 177 100 | 177 100 | 127 967 | 127 967 | ||
| Cost of sales | -105 995 | 2 001 | -103 994 | -77 617 | 1 794 | -75 823 |
| Gross profit | 71 105 | 2 001 | 73 106 | 50 350 | 1 794 | 52 144 |
| Variation biological assets | 17 984 | 17 984 | 0 | 10 465 | 10 465 | |
| Planting cost (net) | -7 466 | -7 466 | 0 | -4 765 | -4 765 | |
| Selling, general and administrative expenses | -12 028 | -12 028 | -9 619 | -9 619 | ||
| Other operating income/(charges) | 148 | 148 | -1 790 | -1 790 | ||
| Operating result | 59 225 | 12 519 | 71 744 | 38 941 | 7 494 | 46 435 |
| Financial income | 458 | 458 | 248 | 248 | ||
| Financial charges | - 380 | - 380 | - 574 | - 574 | ||
| Exchange differences | 5 023 | 5 023 | -3 100 | -3 100 | ||
| Financial result | 5 101 | 5 101 | -3 426 | -3 426 | ||
| Profit before tax | 64 326 | 12 519 | 76 845 | 35 515 | 7 494 | 43 009 |
| Tax expense | -11 199 | -3 210 | -14 409 | -9 562 | -1 298 | -10 860 |
| Profit after tax | 53 127 | 9 309 | 62 436 | 25 953 | 6 196 | 32 149 |
| Share of results of associated companies | - 170 | - 170 | 3 183 | 3 183 | ||
| - Insurance | - 170 | - 170 | 3 183 | 3 183 | ||
| Result from continuing operations | 52 957 | 9 309 | 62 266 | 29 136 | 6 196 | 35 332 |
| Result from discontinued operations | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Profit for the period | 52 957 | 9 309 | 62 266 | 29 136 | 6 196 | 35 332 |
| Attributable to: | ||||||
| - Non-controlling interest | 3 103 | 1 194 | 4 297 | 1 971 | 648 | 2 619 |
| - Equity holders of the parent | 49 854 | 8 115 | 57 969 | 27 165 | 5 548 | 32 713 |
| Earnings per share USD |
||||||
| From continuing and discontinued operations | ||||||
| Basic earnings per share / diluted earnings per share | 6.48 | 3.65 | ||||
| From continuing operations | ||||||
| Basic earnings per share / diluted earnings per share | 6.48 | 3.65 |
| Profit for the period | 52 957 | 9 309 | 62 266 | 29 136 | 6 196 | 35 332 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other comprehensive income: | ||||||
| - Exchange differences on translating foreign operations | 1 048 | 0 | 1 048 | -1 929 | 0 | -1 929 |
| - Reclassification adjustments | 0 | 0 | 0 | - 785 | 0 | - 785 |
| - Revaluation available for sale | 0 | 0 | 0 | 226 | 0 | 226 |
| - Income tax relating to components of other comprehensive income | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total other comprehensive income for the year, net of tax: | 1 048 | 0 | 1 048 | -2 488 | 0 | -2 488 |
| Other comprehensive income attributable to: | ||||||
| - Non-controlling interest | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| - Equity holders of the parent | 1 048 | 0 | 1 048 | -2 488 | 0 | -2 488 |
| Total comprehensive income for the year | 54 005 | 9 309 | 63 314 | 26 648 | 6 196 | 32 844 |
| Total comprehensive income attributable to: | ||||||
| - Non-controlling interest | 3 103 | 1 194 | 4 297 | 1 971 | 648 | 2 619 |
| - Equity holders of the parent | 50 902 | 8 115 | 59 017 | 24 677 | 5 548 | 30 225 |
| Consolidated statement of cash flows | ANNEX 3 | |
|---|---|---|
| In KUSD | 30/06/2011 | 30/06/2010 |
| Operating activities | ||
| Result before tax | 76 845 | 43 009 |
| Adjusted for: | ||
| Depreciation | 5 560 | 4 603 |
| Movement in provisions | 1 020 | 605 |
| Impairment CSM | 0 | 3 314 |
| Unrealised exchange result | 0 | 0 |
| Changes in fair value of biological assets | -10 522 | -5 700 |
| Other non-cash results | 85 | - 298 |
| Financial income and charges | - 77 | 325 |
| Capital loss on receivables | 0 | 0 |
| Capital loss on sale of investments | 0 | 0 |
| Result on disposal of property, plant and equipment | - 48 | 419 |
| Result on disposal of financial assets | 0 | -1 350 |
| Cash flow from operating activities before change in net working capital | 72 863 | 44 927 |
| Change in net working capital | -26 284 | -3 490 |
| Cash flow from operating activities after change in net working capital | 46 579 | 41 437 |
| Income taxes paid | -12 914 | -10 478 |
| Cash flow from operating activities after taxes | 33 665 | 30 959 |
| Investing activities | ||
| Acquisition intangible assets | -2 522 | -1 927 |
| Acquisition biological assets | -7 579 | -4 825 |
| Acquisition property, plant & equipment | -10 629 | -8 727 |
| Acquisition investment property | 0 | 0 |
| Acquisition financial assets | -17 979 | -5 989 |
| Dividends received from associated companies | 0 | 0 |
| Proceeds from sale of property, plant & equipment | 696 | 315 |
| Proceeds from sale of financial assets | 0 | 1 547 |
| Cash flow from investing activities | -38 013 | -19 606 |
| Free cash flow | -4 348 | 11 353 |
| Financing activities | ||
| Equity transactions with non-controlling parties | 415 | 68 |
| Increase/(decrease) in long-term financial borrowings | -2 601 | -2 843 |
| Increase/(decrease) short-term financial borrowings | 201 | -1 061 |
| Last year's dividend paid during this bookyear | 0 | 0 |
| Dividends paid by subsidiaries to minorities | - 351 | - 295 |
| Financial income and charges | 91 | - 368 |
| Cash flow from financing activities | -2 245 | -4 499 |
| Net increase in cash and cash equivalents | -6 593 | 6 854 |
| Cash and cash equivalents (opening balance) | 64 608 | 52 437 |
| Effect of exchange rate fluctuations on cash and cash equivalents | 49 | - 18 |
| Cash and cash equivalents (closing balance) | 58 064 | 59 273 |
ANNEX 4
| Capital stock SIPEF |
Share premium SIPEF |
Retained earnings |
Translation differences |
Share- holders' equity |
Non-controlling interest |
Total equity |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| In KUSD | |||||||
| January 1, 2011 | 45 819 | 21 502 | 316 133 | -14 905 | 368 549 | 27 240 | 395 789 |
| Total comprehensive income | 0 | 0 | 57 969 | 1 048 | 59 017 | 4 297 | 63 314 |
| Last year's dividend paid Change in the percentage of controlled |
0 | 0 | -19 657 | 0 | -19 657 | 0 | -19 657 |
| entities | 0 | 0 | -12 351 | 0 | -12 351 | -5 628 | -17 979 |
| Other | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 65 | 65 |
| June 30, 2011 | 45 819 | 21 502 | 342 094 | -13 857 | 395 558 | 25 974 | 421 532 |
| January 1, 2010 | 45 819 | 21 502 | 242 889 | -13 292 | 296 918 | 21 611 | 318 529 |
| Total comprehensive income | 0 | 0 | 32 939 | -2 714 | 30 225 | 2 619 | 32 844 |
| Last year's dividend paid | 0 | 0 | -11 825 | 0 | -11 825 | 0 | -11 825 |
| Change in the percentage of controlled | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||
| entities | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Other | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | - 236 | - 236 |
| June 30, 2010 | 45 819 | 21 502 | 264 003 | -16 006 | 315 318 | 23 994 | 339 312 |
Segment reporting is based on two segment reporting formats. The primary reporting format represents business segments – palm products, rubber, tea, bananas & plants and insurance – which represent the management structure of the group.
The secondary reporting format represents the geographical locations where the group is active. Gross profit per geographical market shows revenue minus cost of sales based on the location where the enterprise's products are produced.
Segment result is revenue minus expense that is directly attributable to the segment and the relevant portion of income and expense that can be allocated on a reasonable basis to the segment.
The result of the companies consolidated using the equity method is immediately detailed (insurance/Europe) in the income statement.
| Revenue | Cost | Gross profit | IAS 41 | Gross profit | % of |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| of sales | before IAS 41 | IFRS | total | ||
| 76,2 | |||||
| 19,4 | |||||
| 1,3 | |||||
| 1,7 | |||||
| 1,3 | |||||
| 0,1 | |||||
| 177 100 | -105 995 | 71 105 | 2 001 | 73 106 | 100,0 |
| 135 471 25 731 4 065 10 830 947 56 |
-81 392 -11 756 -3 161 -9 672 0 - 14 |
54 079 13 975 904 1 158 947 42 |
1 692 227 14 68 0 0 |
55 771 14 202 918 1 226 947 42 |
| 1H10 - KUSD | Revenue | Cost of sales |
Gross profit before IAS 41 |
IAS 41 | Gross profit IFRS |
% of total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Palm | 92 188 | -56 650 | 35 538 | 1 462 | 37 000 | 71,0 |
| Rubber | 17 370 | -7 111 | 10 259 | 192 | 10 451 | 20,0 |
| Tea | 5 012 | -2 949 | 2 063 | 15 | 2 078 | 4,0 |
| Bananas and plants | 12 507 | -10 907 | 1 600 | 125 | 1 725 | 3,3 |
| Corporate | 840 | 0 | 840 | 0 | 840 | 1,6 |
| Others | 50 | 0 | 50 | 0 | 50 | 0,1 |
| Total | 127 967 | -77 617 | 50 350 | 1 794 | 52 144 | 100,0 |
The segment "corporate" comprises the management fees received from non group entities. Under IFRS (IAS 41) depreciation on biological assets is not allowed.
| 1H11 - KUSD | Revenue | Cost of sales |
Other income |
Gross profit before IAS 41 |
IAS 41 | Gross profit IFRS |
% of total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Indonesia | 95 965 | -50 918 | 253 | 45 300 | 964 | 46 264 | 63,3 |
| Papua New Guinea | 69 302 | -45 391 | 0 | 23 911 | 968 | 24 879 | 34,0 |
| Ivory Coast | 10 830 | -9 672 | 0 | 1 158 | 69 | 1 227 | 1,7 |
| Europe | 0 | 0 | 694 | 694 | 0 | 694 | 0,9 |
| Others | 56 | - 14 | 0 | 42 | 0 | 42 | 0,1 |
| Total | 176 153 | -105 995 | 947 | 71 105 | 2 001 | 73 106 | 100,0 |
| 1H10 - KUSD | Revenue | Cost | Other | Gross profit | IAS 41 | Gross profit | % of |
| of sales | income | before IAS 41 | IFRS | total | |||
| Indonesia | 67 449 | -34 472 | 168 | 33 145 | 709 | 33 854 | 64,9 |
| Papua New Guinea | 47 070 | -32 238 | 0 | 14 832 | 960 | 15 792 | 30,3 |
| Ivory Coast | 12 082 | -10 907 | 0 | 1 175 | 125 | 1 300 | 2,5 |
| Europe | 0 | 0 | 722 | 722 | 0 | 722 | 1,4 |
| Others | 476 | 0 | 0 | 476 | 0 | 476 | 0,9 |
| Total | 127 077 | -77 617 | 890 | 50 350 | 1 794 | 52 144 | 100,0 |
| ANNEX 6 | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Non-recurring result | 30/06/2011 30/06/2010 | ||
| Sale Brasil Write down CSM (Indonesia) |
0 0 |
1 350 -3 314 |
|
| Non-recurring result included in the profit after tax | 0 | -1 964 | |
| Sale Bruns ten Brink Sale Asco Life |
0 0 |
2 358 220 |
|
| Non-recurring result included in the profit of the associates | 0 | 2 578 | |
| Total non-recurring result | 0 | 614 | |
| Net result - part of the group | 0 | 1 035 | |
| Net result - part of the non-controlling interests | 0 | - 421 |
Deloitte Bedrijfsrevisoren / Reviseurs d'Entreprises Lange Lozanastraat 270 2018 Antwerpen Belgium Tel. + 32 3 800 85 00
Fax + 32 3 800 85 01 www.deloitte.be
Limited review report on the consolidated half-year financial information for the sixmonth period ended 30 June 2011
The original text of this report is in Dutch
Deloitte Bedrijfsrevisoren / Reviseurs d'Entreprises Deloitie Beurjistevsionen / Reviseurs of Emilepiness
Surgerlijke vennootschap onder de vorm van een coöperatieve vennootschap met beperkte aansprakelijkheid /
Société civile sous forme d'une société coopérative à responsab
Deloitte Bedrijfsrevisoren / Reviseurs d'Entreprises Lange Lozanastraat 270 2018 Antwerpen Belgium Tel. + 32 3 800 85 00 Fax + 32 3 800 85 01 www.deloitte.be
To the board of directors
We have performed a limited review of the accompanying condensed consolidated statement of financial position, condensed consolidated income statement, condensed consolidated statement of comprehensive income, condensed consolidated statement of cash flows, condensed consolidated statement of changes in equity and selective notes 1 to 9 (jointly the "interim financial information") of SA Sipef NV ("the company") and its subsidiaries (jointly "the group") for the six-month period ended 30 June 2011.
The board of directors of the company is responsible for the preparation and fair presentation of this interim financial information. Our responsibility is to express a conclusion on this interim financial information based on our review.
The interim financial information has been prepared in accordance with IAS 34, "Interim Financial Reporting" as adopted by the EU.
Our limited review of the interim financial information was conducted in accordance with the recommended auditing standards on limited reviews applicable in Belgium, as issued by the "Institut des Réviseurs d'Entreprises/Instituut van de Bedrijfsrevisoren". A limited review consists of making inquiries of group management and applying analytical and other review procedures to the interim financial information and underlying financial data. A limited review is substantially less in scope than an audit performed in accordance with the auditing standards on consolidated annual accounts as issued by the "Institut des Réviseurs d'Entreprises/Instituut van de Bedrijfsrevisoren". Accordingly, we do not express an audit opinion.
Based on our limited review nothing has come to our attention that causes us to believe that the interim financial information for the six-month period ended 30 June 2011 is not prepared, in all material respects, in accordance with IAS 34 "Interim Financial Reporting" as adopted by the EU. We note however, with regard to the valuation of the biological assets, because of the inherent uncertainty associated with the value of biological assets due to the volatility of the prices of the agricultural produce, that their carrying value may differ from the realisable value.
Antwerp, 17 August 2011
The statutory auditor
DELOITTE Bedrijfsrevisoren / Reviseurs d'Entreprises BV o.v.v.e. CVBA / SC s.f.d. SCRL Represented by Dirk Cleymans
Deloitte Bedrijfsrevisoren / Reviseurs d'Entreprises Burgerlijke vennootschap onder de vorm van een coöperatieve vennootschap met beperkte aansprakelijkheid /
Société civile sous forme d'une société coopérative à responsabilité limitée Registered Office: Berkenlaan 8b, B-1831 Diegem VAT BE 0429 053 863 - RPR Brussel/RPM Bruxelles - IBAN BE 17 2300 0465 6121 - BIC GEBABEBB
Building tools?
Free accounts include 100 API calls/year for testing.
Have a question? We'll get back to you promptly.