Environmental & Social Information • Sep 16, 2016
Environmental & Social Information
Open in ViewerOpens in native device viewer
Entra ASA, September 2016
| Number of Properties | 96 |
|---|---|
| Total Area ('000s) | 1 243 sqm |
| Occupancy Rate | 95.4% |
| WAULT | 7.1 years |
| Property Market Value | 32.1 bn |
| Net Interest-Bearing Debt |
15.0 bn |
| Loan-to-Value | 45.9 % |
| EPRA NAV per share | 91.0 |
Biskop Gunnerusgt 14 Oslo
National Library Oslo
Tordenskioldsgate 12 Oslo
Brynsengfaret 6 Oslo
Fredrik Selmers vei 4 Oslo
Akersgata 51 Oslo
Havnelageret Oslo
Schweigaardsgate 15 Oslo
| Sold properties | Location | Transactio n quarter |
No of sqm |
Transactio n value (NOKm) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kalfarveien 31 |
Bergen | Q2 2016 |
8 440 | 85 |
| Fritznersgate 12 | Oslo | Q2 2016 | 824 | 53 |
| Telemarksgata 11 | Skien | Q2 2016 | 4 300 | 11 |
| Ringstabekk AS | Bærum | Q1 2016 | 5 570 | 114 |
| Strandveien 13, Tromsø | Tromsø | Q4 2015 | 11 560 | 158 |
| Tollbugata 2, Bodø | Bodø | Q4 2015 | 940 | 14 |
| Hans Kiersgate 1 b and c |
Drammen | Q4 2015 | 2 230 | 11 |
| Kirkegata 2 B | Arendal | Q3 2015 | 5 800 | 33 |
| Gullfaks, Hinna Park (frwd sale) |
Stavanger | Q3 2015 | 17 900 | Est. 700 |
| Keysersgate 15 | Oslo | Q1 2015 | 315 | 16 |
| Portfolio of six properties | Østfold | Q1 2015 | 62 918 | 1 375 |
| Grønnegaten 122 | Tromsø | Q4 2014 | 6 600 | 72 |
| Skansegaten 2 | Stavanger | Q4 2014 | 4 379 | 110 |
| Sum | 131 776 |
2 751 |
| Lettable area (sqm) | 28,600 |
|---|---|
| Pre-let | 87% |
| WAULT (years) | 10.0 |
| Public tenants share | 100% |
| Project cost (NOKm) | 680 |
| Yield-on-cost | 6.4% |
| Closing | Sep-16 |
| Lettable area (sqm) | 33,300 |
|---|---|
| Rent 2016e (NOKm) | 95 |
| Occupancy | 100% |
| WAULT (years) | c. 4 |
| Public tenants share | >90% |
| No. of parking spaces (#) |
170 |
| Closing | Dec-15 |
| Lettable area (sqm) | 61,000 |
|---|---|
| Rent (Annualised Q416) | 135 |
| Occupancy | 100% |
| WAULT (years) | c. 6 |
| Public tenants share | 40% |
| No. of parking spaces (#) |
370 |
| Closing | Dec-15 |
| Tenant | In % of rent | Sector | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Norwegian Tax Administration |
6.0% | Public |
| 2 | Norwegian Public Road Administration | 4.0% | Public |
| 3 | Norwegian Directorate of Health |
3.7% | Public |
| 4 | National Library of Norway | 3.5% | Public |
| 5 | The Norwegian National Rail Administration | 3.4% | Public |
| 6 | Custom Region Oslo and Akershus | 2.5% | Public |
| 7 | Norwegian Water Resources and Energy Directorate | 2.5% | Public |
| 8 | The Norwegian Defence Estates Agency |
2.2% | Public |
| 9 | Norway Post | 2.2% | Public |
| 10 | Borgarting Court of Appeal | 1.9% | Public |
| 11 | Immigration Appeals Board |
1.8% | Public |
| 12 | University College of Southeast Norway | 1.8% | Public |
| 13 | Bærum Municipality | 1.8% | Public |
| 14 | County Governor of Oslo and Akershus | 1.7% | Public |
| 15 | Norconsult AS | 1.6% | Private |
| 16 | Norweigan Petroleum Directorate |
1.5% | Public |
| 17 | Norwegian Environment Agency | 1.5% | Public |
| 18 | Norwegian Directorate for Education and Training | 1.4% | Public |
| 19 | Asker and Bærum Police District |
1.4% | Public |
| 20 | Oslo Municipality Undertaking for Social Services Buildings | 1.4% | Public |
| Total top 20 | 49.2% | ||
| Other tenants | 50.8% | ||
| Total | 100.0% |
* Source: Norsk leietakerindeks
* Q215 adjusted for cost related to termination of swaps (115m), actually reported number was 111m
* Q315 adjusted for extraordinary rental income in relation to Berner buyout (30m), actually reported number was 258m
* Annualised, rolling 4 quarters **Dividends presented in shaded area
| All figures in NOK millions | Q2-16 | Q2-15 | YTD Q2-16 | YTD Q2-15 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rental income | 463 | 423 | 916 | 864 | 1 760 |
| Repairs & maintenance | -14 | -8 | -16 | -16 | -56 |
| Operating costs | -27 | -34 | -50 | -60 | -129 |
| Net operating income | 421 | 381 | 850 | 787 | 1 574 |
| Other revenue | 54 | 27 | 113 | 192 | 240 |
| Other costs | -55 | -22 | -109 | -180 | -224 |
| Administrative costs | -28 | -32 | -72 | -87 | -168 |
| Share of profit from associates and JVs | 11 | 32 | 19 | 42 | 44 |
| Net realised financials |
-140 | -245 | -273 | -394 | -625 |
| Net income | 264 | 140 | 528 | 361 | 840 |
| - of which net income from property management |
258 | 110 | 536 | 321 | 799 |
| Changes in value of investment properties | 567 | 178 | 749 | 893 | 1 818 |
| Changes in value of financial instruments | -41 | 344 | -203 | 423 | 417 |
| Profit before tax | 790 | 661 | 1 074 | 1 677 | 3 075 |
| Tax payable | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Change in deferred tax | -187 | -155 | -250 | -223 | -354 |
| Profit for period/year | 603 | 506 | 824 | 1 454 | 2 721 |
| All figures in NOK millions | Q2-16 | Q2-15 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Book value of property portfolio | 31 170 | 27 939 | 28 823 |
| Investments in associates and JVs | 1 503 | 1 170 | 2 789 |
| Financial derivatives | 640 | 425 | 530 |
| Other assets | 1 404 | 652 | 1 265 |
| Cash and bank deposits | 158 | 72 | 212 |
| Total assets | 34 874 | 30 259 | 33 619 |
| Total equity | 13 625 | 12 058 | 13 354 |
| Interest-bearing debt | 15 701 | 13 396 | 15 205 |
| Deferred tax liability | 3 572 | 3 178 | 3 324 |
| Financial derivatives | 1 283 | 941 | 1 121 |
| Other liabilities | 693 | 685 | 615 |
| Total non-current liabilities | 34 874 | 30 259 | 33 619 |
| Interest bearing nominal debt |
15 196m |
|---|---|
| Unutilised credit facilities | 5 108m |
| Loan-to-value | 45.9 %* |
| Weighted average maturity |
4.8 yrs |
| Average interest rate | 3.59 % |
| Share at fixed rate |
58 % |
| Average maturity of interest rate hedges |
3.7 yrs |
* Pro forma LTV post the Skøyen transaction is 49.8 %
Major gains are achieved when environmental commitment underpins the business; for the environment, for our customers for Entra and for our profitability
Green criteria's when purchasing property. Over time come down to Entra's average energy consumption
Build profitable innovative environmental buildings for learning and development of new solutions
Investments in portfolio
Make technical environmental investments in the portfolio in collaboration with customers (green benefit agreements use
Reducing water consumption and waste Consider BREEAM in use by pilot
Entra Building implemented. Target of BREEAM Exc/Energy class A Flexible solutions Focus on life cycle costs
Directorships in environmental trade organizations. Lecture / posts / articles
Green is valuable for owner and for the tenant
Lower operating/common
costs
Branding / CSR
Higher rent Higher valuation and exit value
Powerhouse Kjørbo, Sandvika Schweigaardsgate 16, Oslo
Brattørkaia 15, Trondheim Papirbredden 2, Drammen
• Most important measure to reduce tenants common costs which in turn gives potential for higher rent
Source: Entra, "Nordic City rapport - autumn 2013"; "The economics of green building (Eichholtz, Kok & Quigley, 2010); "The value of sustainability in real estate: a review from a valuation perspective" (Warren-Myers, 2012); North Pass research 2012; NGBC
| BREEAM-NOR Section | Section Weighting |
|---|---|
| Energy | 19.0% |
| Health and wellbeing |
15.0% |
| Materials | 13.5% |
| Management | 12.0% |
| Transport | 10.0% |
| Innovation | 10.0% |
| Land use & Ecology |
10.0% |
| Pollution | 8.0% |
| Waste | 7.5% |
| Water | 5.0% |
Source: BREEAM-NOR Technical manual English version 2016
| BREEAM-NOR Rating |
% Score |
|---|---|
| Outstanding | ≥ 85 |
| Excellent | ≥ 70 |
| Very Good | ≥ 55 |
| Good | ≥ 45 |
| Pass | ≥ 30 |
| Unclassified | < 30 |
Outstanding: Less than 1% of new buildings Excellent: Top 10% of new buildings Very Good: Top 25% of new buildings Good: Top 50% of new buildings Pass: Top 75% of new buildings
Powerhouse Kjørbo Schweigaardsgate 16
• Projects and solutions that realise the long term vision of a low-carbon and climate-resilient future already today. Typically, this will entail zero-emission solutions and governance structures that integrate environment concerns into all activities. Example projects include renewable energy projects such as solar or wind Dark green
Medium green
Light green
• Projects and solutions that represent steps towards the long-term vision, but are not quite there yet. Example projects include sustainable buildings with good (but not excellent) energy efficiency ratings
• Projects and solutions that are environmentally friendly but are not by themselves a part of the long-term vision. Example projects include energy efficiency improvements in fossilbased industry that result in short-term reductions of greenhouse gas emissions, and dieselfueled buses
• Based on the overall assessment of the project types that will be financed as well as governance, reporting " and transparency considerations, Entra's Green Bond Framework gets a Dark Green shading"
• We find no weaknesses in Entra's Green Bond " framework"
| Bondholder report | |
|---|---|
| 1 | |
| Green Bonds | |
31
Trond Simonsen, Manager of Environment and Technical
www.entra.no/investor-relations
Building tools?
Free accounts include 100 API calls/year for testing.
Have a question? We'll get back to you promptly.