Quarterly Report • Feb 9, 2017
Quarterly Report
Open in ViewerOpens in native device viewer
Investor presentation
2 086
1 587
Commercial Lines of Business (GWP MNOK)
Quarterly volume and share price end of quarter¹ 84 74 84 94 2010201120122013201420152016
Public Lines of Business (GWP MNOK)
610
829 730
Change of Ownership Insurance (GWP MNOK)
451 426 400
526 509
524
| GWP growth rate 2017-19 |
15% |
|---|---|
| Net combined ratio | 92% |
| Solvency II capital ratio | 125% - 160% |
| Return on equity* | >20% |
* Shareholder's Equity includes security provisions reflecting changes in accounting principles from January 1st 2016
Vision The Challenger
Business Idea This will happen through unique relationships, best in class decision-making and cost effective solutions
Main targets Cost and quality leadership Profitable growth Top 3
Values Credible Open Bold Committed
• Operating profit of NOK 541m (NOK 536m)
Guiding 2017: CR 92%, growth 16% (18% local), cost ratio <7.0%
Bond portfolio with avg. BBB+ rating at year end
Commercial and public line of business Norway
Nordic growth leader
GWP total NOK 3 439m, +21%
A history of profitable growth
GWP has grown 3.7 times in period 2008-2016
* Return on Solvency Capital until 2016 when reflecting changes in accounting principles from Jan. 1st 2016 where Shareholder's Equity includes security provisions
Perfect storm as expected in Q4, but we will ComeBack '17
Net combined ratio 113.2%
Executing ComeBack '17
Change of Country Manager
Finland and UK will be reported under Norway until further notice, as at December 31st 2016 not material * TNS Gallup Survey
13
Best ever Claims Handling in Q4 2016
"Clean desk" project speeding up claims handling, all new claims handled within 48hours
• Strong start on new volume 2017
Solid foundation to reach Next Level
Increased efficiency for all lines of business
In-house specialist competence in all lines of business
Setting new quality standard for Sweden
Extensive database built bigger than Scandinavia
Careful entry in 2016
First panel arrangement signed, opportunities increasing
Manchester team building existing and new relationships
4 clients on board
Cost leadership
Competitors: ~ 25 % (incl claims) Broker & PRF: < 20 % over time
Fat competitive landscape, homogenous client base leads to efficiency over time
Market: ~ £300m, ~80 % loss ratio Broker & PRF: Risk selection and rate increase
Profitability measures possible, significant growth potential
Market: Good claims handling, poor service Broker & PRF: Preferred partner for HA's from start?
Indications of lazy competitive landscape (excl claims handling)
Market: 3 main competitors, one «monopolist» Broker & PRF: Top 3 within 18 months
A joint housing expert challenging #1 and #2
An example of traction in Public Sector UK
Insurance London Consortium (ILC) 9 London Boroughs
Volume estimates UK
Volume full year 2016 Estimate 2017 Preliminary estimate 2018
Volume 25 MNOK 150 - 200 MNOK 400 – 500 MNOK
| [1.000.000 NOK] | Q4 2016 | Q4 2015 | FY 2016 | FY 2015 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross premiums written | 392,3 | 325,3 | 3 439,0 | 2 843,4 | GWP growth 21% in 2016, 21% in Q4 2016 | |
| Gross premiums earned | 768,6 | 698,7 | 3 250,4 | 2 791,1 | ||
| Gross claims incurred | (740,3) | (617,0) | (3 005,0) | (2 283,6) | ||
| Earned premiums, net of reinsurance | 624,7 | 535,1 | 2 669,0 | 2 176,0 | ||
| Claims incurred, net of reinsurance | (632,6) | (475,7) | (2 540,4) | (1 861,0) | ||
| Net commission income | (9,7) | 15,6 | 118,5 | 112,9 | ||
| Operating expenses | (41,1) | (56,9) | (167,0) | (182,0) | ||
| Other income/costs | (20,8) | (4,4) | (38,3) | (13,5) | ||
| Net financial income | 149,9 | 152,8 | 499,3 | 303,8 | Strong investment result of 7.0% in 2016 | |
| Profit before tax | 70,5 | 166,5 | 541,1 | 536,1 | Best full-year operating profit ever |
|
| Tax | (1,4) | (16,4) | (88,4) | (71,9) | ||
| Profit before components of comprehensive income |
69,1 | 150,1 | 452,7 | 464,2 | ||
| Claims ratio, net of ceded business | (1) | 101,3 % | 88,9 % | 95,2 % | 85,5 % | |
| Expense ratio, net of ceded business | (2) | 8,1 % | 7,7 % | 1,8 % | 3,2 % | |
| Combined ratio, net of ceded business | (3) | 109,4 % | 96,6 % | 97,0 % | 88,7 % | Very poor |
| Gross claims ratio | (4) | 96,3 % | 88,3 % | 92,5 % | 81,8 % | |
| Gross expense ratio | (5) | 6,9 % | 9,6 % | 6,8 % | 7,5 % | Satisfactory development |
| Gross combined ratio | (6) | 103,3 % | 97,9 % | 99,2 % | 89,4 % | Some reinsurance contributions in 2016 |
| Retention rate | (7) | 81,3 % | 76,6 % | 82,1 % | 78,0 % | |
| Earnings per share | (8) | 0,80 | 1,74 | 5,25 | 5,48 |
(1) Claims incurred, net of reinsurance in % of earned premiums, net of reinsurance
(2) Operating expenses in % of earned premiums, net of reinsurance
(3) Net claims ratio + net expense ratio
(4) Gross claims incurred in % of gross premiums earned
(5) Sales and administration costs in % of gross premiums earned
(6) Gross claims ratio + gross expense ratio
(7) Earned premiums, net of reinsurance in % of gross earned premiums
(8) Profit before other comprehensive income divided by weighted number of shares
Priority 1 is to never allow any risk for solvency issues or fire sale
Reduced risk in Fixed Income portfolio
Reduced High-Yield exposure in 2016 and beginning of 2017
| Key Figures | In-house Managed Portfolio |
OSEBX |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | 116 % | 25 % |
| Dividend yield | 1.8 % | 3.6% |
| P/E NTM* | 17.5 | 16.7 |
| 3 yr sales CAGR |
24 % | -2 % |
| 3 yr EPS CAGR |
30 % | -19 % |
*Factset estimates except for one company not listed where own estimates are used
Investment performance evaluated over the long term
| Portfolio data 31.12.2016 | |
|---|---|
| Size MNOK | 4 781 |
| Yield | 3.2 |
| Duration | 0.4 |
| Credit duration | 2.8 |
| Average rating |
BBB+ |
*Benchmark bond portfolio made up by basket of cross-over funds: Storebrand Rente +, Arctic Return Class I, Carnegie Corp. Bond, Handelsbanken Høyrente, Holberg Kreditt, Pareto Høyrente, Alfred Berg Income, Eika Kreditt, Landkreditt Høyrente, Skagen Høyrente
Very strong investment result
7.0% return on investment portfolio, net investment result of 499 MNOK
| Shareholder | No. Shares | Percent |
|---|---|---|
| SWEDBANK ROBUR NORDEN AND EUROPA | 7 898 936 | 9.17 % |
| STENSHAGEN INVEST AS | 6 500 000 | 7.54 % |
| ODIN NORGE AND NORDEN | 5 917 058 | 6.73 % |
| OJADA AS | 3 563 116 | 4.14 % |
| TJONGSFJORD INVEST AS1 | 2 811 809 | 3.26 % |
| VERDIPAPIRFONDET HANDELSBANKEN | 2 800 000 | 3.25 % |
| ARTEL HOLDING A/S | 1 873 451 | 2.17 % |
| MP PENSJON PK | 1 845 379 | 2.14 % |
| FROGNES AS | 1 649 916 | 1.92 % |
| VEVLEN GÅRD AS | 1 550 000 | 1.80 % |
| GENERALI PANEUROPE LTD | 1 492 250 | 1.73 % |
| JOHAN VINJE AS | 1 437 841 | 1.67 % |
| AVANZA BANK AB | 1 333 727 | 1.55 % |
| VERDIPAPIRFONDET ALFRED BERG GAMBA | 1 324 220 | 1.54 % |
| PETROSERVICE AS | 1 283 815 | 1.49 % |
| NORDNET BANK AB | 1 125 872 | 1.31 % |
| DYVI INVEST AS | 1 030 933 | 1.20 % |
| AAT INVEST AS | 1 005 000 | 1.17 % |
| ALSØY INVEST AS2 | 1 002 751 | 1.16 % |
| NORE-INVEST AS | 930 637 | 1.08 % |
| 20 LARGEST | 47 676 711 | 55.34 % |
| OTHERS | 38 478 894 | 44.66 % |
| TOTAL SHARES | 86 155 605 | 100.00 % |
| 1 CEO, Sverre Bjerkeli | ||
| 2 Chairman of the Board, Jostein Sørvoll |
* Return on Solvency Capital until 2016 when reflecting changes in accounting principles from Jan. 1st 2016 where Shareholder's Equity includes security provisions
| [1.000.000 NOK] | 31.12.2016 | 31.12.2015 |
|---|---|---|
| Owner-occupied property | 13,7 | 13,6 |
| Financial assets | 8 537,6 | 6 623,1 |
| Financial derivatives* | 990,7 | 252,6 |
| Bank deposits | 204,3 | 144,0 |
| Other assets | 1 091,7 | 924,4 |
| Total assets | 9 847,4 | 7 705,1 |
| Total equity | 2 259,4 | 2 012,7 |
| Subordinated loan capital | 645,9 | 148,1 |
| Total reserves | 5 148,0 | 4 306,5 |
| Other liabilities* | 1 794,2 | 1 237,7 |
| Total equity and liabilities | 9 847,4 | 7 705,1 |
Strong capital position:
| Risk | Result | |
|---|---|---|
| + Sweden/Denmark deliver better than guided volume | Medium | ✓ |
| + Upside volume UK relative to guiding | Low | ✓ |
| + Balance sheet growing leads to increased financial income | No | ✓ |
| + Cost ratio Gross & Net going down | No | ✓ |
| - Rate pressure driving claims ratio above guiding |
Low | ✓ |
| - Volume downside in Norway relative to guiding |
Medium | ✓ |
| - Profitability behind guiding in Sweden |
Low | ✓ |
| - Profitability behind guiding in Denmark |
Medium | Worse |
| - Start up in UK creates profitability problems |
Low | ✓ |
| - Reserve challenges COI Norway |
(New) | Worse |
| Risk | |
|---|---|
| 1. Volume (GWP up 16% (18 local) |
|
| • Upside and downside in UK |
Medium |
| • Downside in Denmark |
Low |
| 2. Cost (gross cost ratio <7.0%) | |
| • Cost outside guiding |
No |
| 3. Profitability (Net Combined Ratio 92%) | |
| • Behind guiding in Norway, Sweden and Finland commercial segment (67% of volume) |
Low |
| • Behind guiding for COI (15% of volume) |
Low |
| • Behind guiding in Denmark (15% of volume) |
Medium |
| • Profitability issues in UK (3% of volume) |
Medium |
| 4. Investments (No guiding) |
|
| • Investment volatility |
Of course |
| Four levels of defense; Competent investment team, Mandate given by board | |
| FSA stress tests, Even stronger internal stress tests |
| Guiding for full year 2016 | Result 2016 | Guiding 2017 |
|---|---|---|
| Volume up 22 % | 21 % |
16 % (18 % local) |
| Gross expense ratio < 7.5 % | 6.8 % |
< 7.0 % |
| Net Combined ratio 90 % | 97 % |
92 % |
No guiding will be given on investment income
ROE 2016 is 21.1 % > LT ROE target of 20.0%
Profitable growth expected also in 2017
Guiding 2017: CR 92%, growth 16% (18% local), cost ratio <7.0%
Preliminary year-end result 2016
Q&A
Building tools?
Free accounts include 100 API calls/year for testing.
Have a question? We'll get back to you promptly.