Annual Report • Apr 29, 2022
Annual Report
Open in ViewerOpens in native device viewer


| PAGE 06 |
KEY FIGURES |
|---|---|
| PAGE 07 |
CEO LETTER |
| PAGE 08 |
DIRECTORS OF THE BOARD |
| PAGE 11 |
BOARD OF DIRECTOR'S REPORT |
| PAGE 35 |
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE |
| PAGE 49 |
THE GROUP |
| PAGE 137 |
PARENT COMPANY |
| PAGE 161 |
FINANCIAL CALENDAR |
| PAGE 162 |
RESPONSIBILITY STATEMENT |
| PAGE 163 |
AUDITORS REPORT |
| PAGE 169 |
AUSS WORLDWIDE |
AUSS Austevoll Seafood ASA Austral Austral Group S.A.A. BFARM Br. Birkeland Farming AS BRBI Br. Birkeland AS FC FoodCorp Chile S.A. Havfisk Lerøy Havfisk AS LNWS Lerøy Norway Seafoods AS LSG Lerøy Seafood Group ASA Pelagia Pelagia Holding AS SOFP Statement of financial position

GLOSSARY
| Amounts in MNOK | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Profit and loss account | |||
| Operating income Operating expenses |
26,633 -21,823 |
22,447 -18,772 |
23,342 -19,081 |
| EBITDA | 4,810 | 3,675 | 4,260 |
| Depreciation, amortisation, impairment and depreciation of excess value | -1,592 | -1,516 | -1,337 |
| EBIT (before fair value adj.biological assets) | 3,218 | 2,159 | 2,924 |
| Fair value adjustment of biological assets | 1,114 | -954 | -306 |
| Operating profit | 4,332 | 1,205 | 2,617 |
| Income from associated companies | 393 | 250 | 451 |
| Net financial items | -350 | -427 | -312 |
| Profit before tax | 4,376 | 1,027 | 2,756 |
| Profit after tax | 3,436 | 823 | 2,197 |
| Net profit after discontinued operations | 3,436 | 823 | 2,197 |
| Profit to minority interests | 1,455 | 329 | 942 |
| Balance sheet | |||
| Intangible assets | 11,748 | 11,526 | 11,487 |
| Vessels, other property, plant and equipment | 12,344 | 11,485 | 10,954 |
| Other non current assets | 3,217 | 2,732 | 2,531 |
| Current assets | 16,471 | 13,998 | 14,859 |
| Total assets | 43,781 | 39,741 | 39,831 |
| Equity | 25,187 | 22,991 | 23,331 |
| Long term liabilities | 12,623 | 11,130 | 11,122 |
| Short term liabilities | 5,971 | 5,620 | 5,378 |
| Total equity and liabilities | 43,781 | 39,741 | 39,831 |
| Net interest bearing debt | 3,970 | 4,650 | 4,073 |
| Net interest bearing debt incl. IFRS 16 | 5,630 | 5,941 | 5,352 |
| Cash flow | |||
| Net cash flow from operating activities | 4,635 | 2,944 | 3,172 |
| Key ratios | |||
| Liquidity ratio1) | 2.76 | 2.49 | 2.76 |
| Equity-to-asset ratio2) | 58 % | 58 % | 59 % |
| EBITDA margin3) | 18 % | 16 % | 18 % |
| Return on equity4) | 14 % | 4 % | 10 % |
| Average no. of shares (thousands) * | 201,824 | 201,824 | 201,824 |
| Earnings per share5) | 9.82 | 2.45 | 6.22 |
| Dividend paid per share | 3.50 | 2.50 | 3.50 |
| Proposed dividend per share | 4.50 | - | - |
1) Current assets/short term liabilities
2) Equity/total capital
3) Operating profit/loss before depreciation expressed as a percentage of operating income
4) Net profit after tax (incl. discontinued operations) expressed as a percentage of average equity
5) Net profit after tax (incl. discontinued operations)/average no. of shares
* Ex. treasury shares (893,300) from July 2016, and AUSS shares owned through Br. Birkeland AS for the year 2012 to July 2016
The financial results for 2021 show improved underlying performance in all the Group's segments, demonstrating that both our operations and markets have been resilient in a volatile market environment. We have reached several milestones in the Group in terms of operational performance in the salmon operations, and are also pleased with the financial performance of our pelagic activities in South America and the North Atlantic.
The pandemic continued to impact everyday life during 2021 and at the start of 2022. Our priority has been, and remains, to protect the health and safety of our employees and secure the flow of goods in every market where we are present. The cooperation between our employees and both national and international authorities has kept the food value chain open and supplies of the Group's products operational throughout this challenging period.
With the global pandemic continuing into 2021, the salmon industry increased harvest volumes by 6.7% to approx. 2.89 million tonnes, compared with 2.71 million tonnes in 2020. Harvest volumes in Norway increased by 13.1%, and the average spot prices for 2021 were up 7.5% (NOK 57 per kg) vs. 2020 prices (NOK 53 per kg). Lerøy Seafood Group ASA (LSG) delivered a stronger biological performance in 2021 with a volume of 202,800 tonnes, including the share from associates. Estimates for comparable harvest volume for LSG in 2022, including the share from associates, are in the region of 205,000 to 210,000 tonnes.
For whitefish, the total volume caught was up 4.5% at 71.5 tonnes in 2021 vs. 68.4 tonnes in 2020. Despite the higher volume caught and positive prices realised overall, the challenges faced by the onshore processing industry impacted our results for whitefish activity as a whole in 2021. However, earnings from the whitefish activity increased in 2021 compared with 2020. In 2022, the quota for important species such as cod and haddock will be reduced, and less availability of raw material is a challenge for our onshore operations.
In the South America region, 2021 was another good year for the Peruvian fishmeal industry, with 98% of the anchoveta quota of 4.56 million tonnes caught. Overall, the Austral Group handled the increase in raw material well. Compared with 2020, the production of fishmeal and fish oil increased by 60% and 15% respectively, supported by record production in our factory in the south of Peru.
Total fish landings in Chile from our purseseiner fleet were higher than in 2020 due to the 15% increase in Total Allowable Catch (TAC), combined with additional high-seas quota being made available for purchase from operators within the South Pacific Fish Regional Organisation (SPRFMO). Total raw material intake by Foodcorp increased by 14%, from 92,000 tonnes in 2020 to 105,000 tonnes in 2021. The share of own catches also increased by 14%, from 63,000 tonnes in 2020 to 72,000 tonnes in 2021.
Since 2014 Pelagia has managed to add value to our raw material year on year – by utilising the fully integrated operational structure and expertise of the organisation. In June 2021 Pelagia acquired the remaining 50% share of Hordafor, expanding its activity into the production of salmon protein and oil. Total raw material intake for Pelagia in 2021 (excl. associates) was 1.2 million tonnes, down 9.5% from approx. 1.4 million tonnes in 2020. Despite this decrease, revenue increased by 13% vs. 2020 and earnings were up by 55% due to better prices realised in the market.
As an active owner of one of the leading groups within the global seafood industry, we must promote and support business practices that drive responsible long-term growth resulting in sustainable value creation. Austevoll Seafood became a member of the UN Global Compact in 2020, supporting its 10 principles regarding human rights, labour, the environment and anti-corruption. We are also committed to using the UN Sustainable Development Goals as a framework for developing our future business strategy, both in Austevoll and our subsidiaries. We remain focused on four main topics: "Protect

ARNE MØGSTER CEO Austevoll Seafood ASA
our Ocean", "Improve our Climate", "Empower our People" and "Strengthen our Communities".
The start of the year has been marked by new geopolitical tensions with Russia's invasion of Ukraine. It is a heartbreaking war, and we are concerned above all about the humanitarian consequences. The war is a serious setback for both democratic values and economic development, and is already exerting inflationary pressure due to increasing commodity prices. It is difficult to predict with any certainty how the war will play out for our group of companies, and we are monitoring the situation closely.
Finally, I want to thank all our employees for their hard work and sacrifices in 2021, abiding by the restrictions and procedures introduced in light of the pandemic. The quality of our active ownership is dependent on the quality and commitment of the people working within the Austevoll Seafood Group. Our strategy is to continue to grow and further develop the Group, together with our employees, within its current operating segments. I'm grateful to all of our employees for all the efforts they have put in over the years, and their trust, loyalty and devotion will continue to be the key factors in our success going forward.
Thank you.

Helge Singelstad has been member of the Board since 2008, and has been the Chairman of the Board since 2010. Mr. Singelstad is the CEO in Laco AS, the major shareholder in Austevoll Seafood ASA and DOF ASA. He holds a degree in Computer Engineering from Bergen University College (HiB), a degree in Business Administration from the Norwegian School of Economics (NHH) and a 1st degree of Law from the University of Bergen (UiB). He serves on numerous Boards of Directors, and is Chairman of the Board at Lerøy Seafood Group ASA and Pelagia Holding AS. Mr. Singelstad has extensive experience from various types of businesses such as oil & gas and seafood sector. Helge Singelstad owns 50,000 shares in Austevoll Seafood ASA.

Hege Charlotte Bakken has been member of the Board since 2018, and has been the Deputy Chairman of the Board since 2021. She holds an MSc degree from the Norwegian University of Life Sciences and an Executive MBA from ESCP Europe Business School in Paris. Ms. Bakken is Senior Advisor within strategy and management in Stella Polaris, Netherlands and Director in Marvesa Holding NV, a Dutch investment firm. She previously held positions as Senior Advisor at Hemingway Corporate Finance, Amsterdam, Chief Operating Officer of Marvesa Holding N.V. and Managing Director of Marvesa Rotterdam N.V. She previously fulfilled management roles in Pronova BioPharma Norge ASA, FishMarket International AS, Frionor AS and Norway Seafoods ASA. Ms. Bakken has served as a member of the boards of Lerøy Seafood Group ASA, Pronova Biopharma ASA and Pronova BioPharma Norge AS.

Lill Maren Møgster has been member of the Board since 2012. Ms. Møgster is one of the main owners in Laco AS, the main shareholder of Austevoll Seafood ASA and DOF ASA. She is educated Bachelor of Management from the Norwegian Business School (BI) and holds a Master of Strategy and Management (NHH). Ms. Møgster is experienced within sales and finance after having worked in various subsidiaries of Laco AS since 2007. She holds board positions in several companies. Lill Maren Møgster owns shares in Austevoll Seafood ASA indirectly through Laco AS.

HELGE MØGSTER (1953) Member of the Board
Helge Møgster has been member of the Board since the company was founded in April 1981, and served as Chairman of the Board until 2006. Mr. Møgster is one of the main owners in Laco AS, the main shareholder of Austevoll Seafood ASA and DOF ASA. Mr. Møgster has extensive experience from all aspects of the fisheries sector. Additionally he knows the offshore service sector very well. He is holding board positions in several companies. Helge Møgster owns shares in Austevoll Seafood ASA indirectly through Laco AS.


Siren Merete Grønhaug has been member of the Board since 2014. Ms. Grønhaug graduated as a Business Economist from the Norwegian School of Economics (NHH), and has additional training through the AFF Solstrand management development programme and at BI Norwegian Business School. She is the Group director HR of Lerøy Seafood Group ASA, and was previously CFO of Lerøy Seafood AS. She has broad knowledge in the seafood sector after many years of experience at executive levels in Lerøy. Ms. Grønhaug has extensive board experience from various companies in Lerøy Seafood Group ASA.

Eirik Drønen Melingen has been member of the Board since 2017. Mr. Melingen has a bachelor degree in Marine technology from Bergen University College and a Masters Degree in Offshore Floating Systems from University of Strathclyde. Mr. Melingen has experience from offshore shipping companies with specialized vessels within Subsea, Marine Seismic, Offshore Supply and Seismic Support. Eirik Drønen Melingen owns shares in Austevoll Seafood ASA indirectly through Laco AS.

Hege Solbakken has been member of the Board since May 2021. She holds an MSc degree in Comparative Politics from the University in Bergen (UiB), specializing in international politics and additional studies in Business & Human Rights (UiB) and Corporate Governance (BI). She has served as Chief of Staff and State Secretary in the Ministry of Transportation and the Ministry of Municipalities and Regions, as State Secretary in the Prime Minister's office, and as political adviser with the Ministry of Fisheries and Coastal Affairs. Ms. Solbakken has been leader of the Maritime Forum Norway and CEO in the Offshore Media Group, and has worked with Board and Executive selection in Visindi. She now heads Jefferson Wells Norway and holds board positions in Voss Veksel og Landmandsbank ASA, and in other organisations.

Since it was established in 1981, Austevoll Seafood ASA (AUSS) has developed into an active owner of world-leading companies within aquaculture, fisheries, processing, sales and distribution. This is also reflected in the company's vision:
Through its portfolio companies, AUSS owns world-leading players in the production of Atlantic salmon and trout throughout the value chain, from roe to end products supplied to consumers. The Group is also a major player within whitefish fisheries, and here too has control of the entire value chain from catch to end product. AUSS is involved in pelagic operations within fisheries, production of fishmeal and fish oil, and frozen pelagic consumer products. In addition, the Group has sales operations in Norway, Europe, Asia, the USA and South America.
Since it was established, AUSS has remained loyal to its strategic foundations of "creating lasting values through sustainable, expert use of freshwater resources and the ocean, in thriving communities".
The entire value chain in AUSS's portfolio companies has its "origin" in sustainable use
of the oceans. The Group's growth has been and shall continue to be sustainable, both financially and from a climate/environmental perspective. Sustainable growth places stringent requirements on the Group within finance, corporate governance, climate and the environment as well as social conditions. Sustainability is a prerequisite for gaining access to capital and is vital to the Group's existence and continued development. We are therefore proud to confirm that the Group's food production is globally competitive, according to the UN's sustainability criteria. Social sustainability is important for sustaining viable local communities and access to the Group's most important resource, people. As well as the strategic foundation of longterm sustainable value creation, the company has therefore emphasised four further main areas in its sustainability reporting where we can make the biggest positive difference: Protect our Ocean, Improve our Climate, Empower our People and Strengthen our Communities.
The Group's foundations were strengthened in 2021, and are manifest in the company's principles for sustainable management, control and reporting in the company's Annual report for 2021.
The company's head office is located on Storebø island, Austevoll municipality, Norway.

The Group's activities are divided into operating segments and reflect its portfolio companies: Lerøy Seafood Group ASA (Europe), Austral Group S.A.A. (Peru), Foodcorp Chile S.A. (Chile), Br. Birkeland AS (Norway), Br. Birkeland Farming AS (Norway) and the joint venture Pelagia Holding AS (Europe).
2021 was another challenging year, with COVID-related restrictions continuing to impact business activity, working life and travel. As vaccination programmes were rolled out, summer 2021 saw some easing of the restrictions, both nationally and internationally. However, the emergence of the mutant Omicron variant in the late autumn led to the reintroduction of restrictions that had previously been lifted. As authorities world wide gained a better picture of the nature of the illness caused by Omicron, most of the restrictions were once again lifted during the first quarter of 2022. Through 2020 and 2021 we have seen how a pandemic, including the associated restrictions and fear, can have a negative impact on demand and value chains. In the second half of 2021, demand for seafood returned to historically high levels, driven in particular by strong demand in the retail sector but also by a gradual positive development in the HoReCa sector as pandemic-related restrictions eased.
Over time, the Board of Directors and management have focused on building a strong Group and ensuring that the portfolio companies have organisations that are ready to solve challenges in difficult and changing conditions. Once again in 2021, the Group's employees demonstrated their flexibility and adaptability, helping to fulfil the Group's underlying social responsibility by keeping the value chain and food supplies operational throughout a challenging year. This provides grounds for an optimistic outlook and our belief that the Group is well positioned to continue its positive long-term development.
Given the prevailing framework conditions, including temporary challenges relating to the COVID-19 pandemic, the Board of Directors is to all intents and purposes satisfied with the Group's results for the 2021 financial year. Special situations call for extraordinary efforts and put organisations to the test. The Board of Directors would like to sincerely thank all the portfolio companies and their employees for their hard work, creativity and flexibility in 2020 and 2021. They have been challenging years for everyone involved.


Lerøy Seafood Group ASA (LSG) is a leading fully integrated seafood corporation with a global reach, which controls the entire value chain for redfish and whitefish, from roe or catches to end products supplied to the consumer. Through organic growth and a series of acquisitions carried out since the stock-exchange listing on 3 June 2002, the Group is now one of the world's largest producers of Atlantic salmon and trout. The acquisitions of Havfisk ASA and Norway Seafood Group AS in 2016 made the Group the largest supplier of whitefish in Norway and a major global supplier. Furthermore, in recent years the Group has extended and consolidated its position as a key player in seafood distribution in Norway and other major international markets. The Group takes an active role in developing the seafood value chain, with ever greater global presence. LSG's goal is to create the world's most efficient and sustainable value chain for seafood. Dialogue with various authorities based on trust, collaboration with suppliers and strategic customers, and a focus on efficiency in its own value chain have made and continue to make it possible for LSG to create innovative and competitive solutions for the end customer that are financially and environmentally sustainable.
Every day, LSG supplies Norwegian seafood corresponding to five million meals to more than 80 different markets. This growth has been achieved through professionalisation, organisation building and access to venture capital. The Group has a clear ambition to further develop this position in the years to come.
LSG's operations are divided into three main areas: Farming, Wild Catch and VAP, Sales & Distribution.
LSG posted total revenue of NOK 23,136 million in 2021 (2020: NOK 19,966 million).
EBITDA was NOK 3,778 million (2020: NOK 3,109 million), and operating profit before fair value adjustment related to biological assets (EBIT) increased from NOK 1,950 million in 2020 to NOK 2,519 million in 2021.
LSG increased its earnings in 2021, with improvements in all operating segments. Good development in demand and higher prices realised, combined with operational improvements, were key factors in the higher earnings.
LSG has three farming regions in Norway: North Norway with Lerøy Aurora AS in Troms and Finnmark; Central Norway with Lerøy Midt AS in Nordmøre and Trøndelag; and West Norway with Lerøy Vest AS, Sjøtroll Havbruk AS, Lerøy Sjøtroll Kjærelva AS, Lerøy Årskog AS, Norsk Oppdrettsservice AS and Lerøy Ocean Harvest AS, known collectively as Lerøy Sjøtroll.
In addition, LSG owns the Scottish fish farming company Scottish Sea Farms Ltd via its 50% shareholding in Norskott Havbruk AS. Scottish Sea Farms Ltd harvested 32,300 tonnes of salmon in 2021 (2020: 24,000 tonnes).
In recent years, the Group has invested heavily in increased smolt capacity and implemented a number of improvement measures. It is therefore pleasing to see that these have
produced a substantial increase in harvest volume. The harvest volume in 2021 was 187,000 tonnes, a significant increase from 171,000 tonnes in 2020 and 158,000 tonnes in 2019. This growth is in line with the Group's plans. All other things equal, the growth in harvest volume has reduced the Group's costs per kilo harvested. Other cost elements and/ or input factors, including higher feed prices, have led to higher costs. The Board and management consider that the Group's relative competitiveness has improved over the past year. Over time, a number of improvement measures have been implemented to increase the Group's production and improve its competitiveness.
Demand for salmon and trout has been severely impacted in recent years by negative demand effects resulting from restrictions relating to the global COVID-19 pandemic. These effects gradually diminished in 2021, and we once again saw record demand for salmon and trout. In total, LSG's prices realised for salmon and trout in 2021 increased by approx. NOK 6 per kilo compared with 2020. The contract share for salmon was approx. 27%. The harvest volume for Farming comprised 13% trout. Prices realised for trout during 2021 were approx. NOK 4 per kg lower than for salmon. The negative price difference between salmon and trout is significantly less than the difference the Group has experienced in the years since 2014.
Lerøy Havfisk's primary business is wild catches of whitefish. The company has licence rights to catch just above 10% of the total Norwegian cod quotas in the zone north of 62 degrees latitude, corresponding to around 30% of the total quota allocated to the trawler fleet. Lerøy Havfisk also owns several processing plants, which are mainly leased out to its sister company Lerøy Norway Seafoods (LNWS) on long-term contracts. Lerøy Havfisk's fishing rights/trawler licences stipulate an operational obligation for these plants.
Lerøy Havfisk's catch volume in 2021 was approx. 72,000 tonnes, up from around 68,000 tonnes in 2020. The increase is attributed to higher quotas. In 2021, the authorities made it possible to transfer up to 15% of the cod quota to 2022, measured by vessel. Prices for haddock and saithe performed well, rising significantly towards the end of 2021. Lerøy Havfisk prioritised fisheries of these species at the end of the year. The company transferred around 5% of its cod quota from 2021 to 2022, amounting to approx. 1,350 tonnes. The coastal fleet also transferred parts of its quota from 2021 to 2022, which means that the decrease in catch volumes for cod in Norway in 2022 will be lower than the quota reduction.
LNWS's primary business is processing wildcaught whitefish. The company has use of 12 processing and purchasing stations in Norway, five of which are leased from Lerøy Havfisk.
Processing whitefish in Norway has been extremely challenging for several years. The onshore industry made a loss in 2021, but the figures showed a significant improvement on 2020. This was partly due to operational improvements but also substantially better access to raw materials compared with 2020. LSG's focus on improving the competitiveness of the whitefish industry is a long-term project and continues undiminished. All other things equal, however, the price level at the start of 2022 makes conditions more challenging for the onshore industry in the current year. Over time, the Group has implemented organisational changes and made significant investments in facilities, which we believe will deliver sustainable earnings for the onshore industry going forward.
On 20 February 2019, the EU's competition authorities ("the Commission") initiated investigations relating to suspected anticompetitive practices in the salmon market. The US Department of Justice (DOJ) started an investigation into the Norwegian salmon industry in November 2019. Lerøy Seafood Group ASA is one of the companies cited in these cases. In the wake of the European Commission's ongoing investigations, several Norwegian-owned aquaculture companies, including Lerøy Seafood Group, have been sued by customers in the USA and Canada.
Austral Group S.A.A.'s (Austral) fully integrated value chain comprises activities within catches, production of fishmeal and oil, and production of consumer products. Austral holds just below 7% of the total quota for anchoveta in Central/North Peru, and just below 4% of the quota in South Peru. The company also purchases anchoveta from third parties for use in its production of fishmeal and oil. In addition, the company has fishing rights for horse mackerel and mackerel. Fishmeal and oil are produced in four factories, located in Coishco, Chancay, Pisco and Ilo. The company has two factories producing consumer products that share premises with the fishmeal and fish oil factories in Coishco and Pisco.
Anchoveta is used to produce fishmeal and oil, and horse mackerel/mackerel is used for consumer products. Anchoveta fisheries in Central and North Peru take place in two seasons: the first season from April to July and the second from November to January. Prior to each season, the Peruvian institute IMARPE carries out evaluation cruises to establish the size of the anchoveta biomass. Based on their findings, the Institute then issues a recommendation for the total quota for the upcoming season.
In 2021, the national fisheries quotas for anchoveta in Central/North Peru totalled 4.5 million tonnes, divided into 2.5 million tonnes in the first season and 2.0 million tonnes in the second season. Of the national quotas allocated, 98% of the quota for the first season had been caught by the end of the season and 99% of the quota for the second season had been caught by the end of the season in January 2022. The national quotas in 2020 totalled 5.2 million tonnes, divided into 2.4 million tonnes in the first season and 2.8 million tonnes in the second season. Of the national quotas allocated in 2020, 98% of the quota for the first season had been caught by the end of the season and 88% of the quota for the second season had been caught by the end of the season in January 2021. 2021 was also a good year for fisheries in South Peru. The company's factory in Ilo processed 111,000 tonnes in 2021, the majority of which was purchased from the coastal fleet. The factory in Ilo did not receive any raw materials in 2020.
The company's total volume of raw materials in 2021, comprising own catches and purchases from third parties, was 569,000 tonnes, up from 391,000 tonnes in 2020. The volume growth is mainly the result of productive fisheries in South Peru, as well as some of the quota of 2.8 million tonnes for the second season of 2020 being caught in January 2021.
In 2021, the company sold 128,000 tonnes of fishmeal and fish oil, compared with 69,000 tonnes in 2020. The low sales volumes in 2020 were impacted by a challenging second season in 2019, when fishing was stopped early in the season and only 36% of the national quota had been fished by the end of the season. This meant that the company started 2020 with unusually low inventories of fishmeal and fish oil. The company's prices realised for fishmeal were 11% higher in 2021 than in 2020. The company sells the majority of its fishmeal to Asia, with China the single largest market. The prices realised for fish oil were down 7% from 2020 to 2021.
The company had caught its entire quota for the second season of 2021 by the end of the year and entered 2022 with inventory of 48,000 tonnes of fishmeal and fish oil. The corresponding inventory at the start of 2021 was 38,000 tonnes.
Austral reported revenue of NOK 2,017 million in 2021 (2020: NOK 1,241 million), EBITDA of NOK 673 million (2020: NOK 338 million) and EBIT of NOK 506 million (2020: NOK 134 million).
The strong revenue and earnings improvement can be attributed to a combination of higher sales volumes and better prices realised for fishmeal in 2021 compared with 2020.
Stringent national restrictions were once again in place in 2021 as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic. The infection rate started falling
from May 2021 but, like the rest of the world, Peru experienced a new wave of infections at the end of the year. The company has maintained its comprehensive safety routines, including compliance with regulations laid down by the authorities, testing routines and implementation/facilitation of quarantine. The COVID-19 outbreak has caused and continues to cause increased uncertainty, higher costs relating to input factors and compliance with statutory regulations, as well as significantly lower predictability than normal.
Foodcorp Chile S.A.'s (FC) fully integrated value chain comprises activities within fisheries, production of consumer products and production of fishmeal and fish oil. FC's quota is currently equivalent to 8.6% of the national quota for horse mackerel caught by the fleet group to which FC's vessels belong. FC also has a quota for sardine/anchoveta. All FC's onshore industrial activities share the same premises in Coronel.
The main season for horse mackerel fishing is from December to July. The main season for sardine/anchoveta fishing is divided into two periods. The first season starts in March and lasts until July/August. The second season normally starts in October/November and continues through December.
This fishing pattern means that the company generates the majority of its earnings in the first half of the year.
The company's supply of raw materials has shown a positive development in recent years. In total, the company received 105,000 tonnes of raw materials in 2021, against 92,000


NIBD GROUP *incl. 50% of Pelagia Holding AS
tonnes in 2020. In addition to the company's own horse mackerel quota of 39,800 tonnes, it also purchased quota of 31,800 tonnes from a third party. The total volume for 2021 was therefore 71,600 tonnes of horse mackerel, compared with 63,100 tonnes in 2020. The volume growth is a result of higher quotas, but the company is also increasing the volumes of third-party quotas that it buys and catches using its own vessels.
The company has also purchased raw materials from the coastal fleet. Raw materials from this fleet group in 2021 were mainly anchoveta and sardines.
The company reported revenue of NOK 716 million in 2021 (2020: NOK 638 million), EBITDA of NOK 192 million (2020: NOK 138 million) and EBIT of NOK 150 million (2020: NOK 101 million).
The increase in revenue and earnings is a result of higher sales volumes and better prices realised for frozen products compared with 2020.
Fishing for horse mackerel in Chile was subject to a sharp fall in 2008/2009. As a result, joint international management of fish stocks was introduced from 2011. Responsibility for the scheme rests with the South Pacific Regional Fisheries Management Organisation (SPRFMO). The quotas established in subsequent years saw only a minor increase, in order to build up the biomass. Thanks to SPRFMO's conservative management, it was able to report in the autumn of 2017 that the biomass had returned to a sustainable level, allowing the organisation to recommend a 17% increase in the quotas for 2018 and 3% for 2019. As of 2020 and up to and through 2022, the increase in quotas has been 15% every year.
The authorities in Chile still have national restrictions in place to combat the COVID-19 pandemic. Here, too, there was a new wave of infections at the end of 2021. The company has maintained its comprehensive safety routines, including compliance with regulations laid down by the authorities, testing routines and implementation/facilitation of quarantine. The COVID-19 outbreak has caused and continues to cause increased uncertainty, higher costs relating to input factors and compliance with statutory regulations, as well as significantly lower predictability than normal.
Br. Birkeland AS (BRBI) was demerged at the end of 2017, such that the farming operations were transferred to the new company Br. Birkeland Farming AS (BFARM), while fishery operations remained in Br. Birkeland AS. At year-end 2021, AUSS owned 55.2% of the shares in Br. Birkeland Farming AS and 42.9% of the shares in Br. Birkeland AS.
BRBI owns and operates two pelagic ring net vessels, each with a 681 basic tonne quota for ring nets and 1,425 basic tonne trawler quota for blue whiting. BRBI also had a vessel fishing for snow crab in 2021. In September 2021, BRBI purchased a second-hand fishing vessel to replace the "Northguider", which sank off Svalbard in December 2018. The vessel has been undergoing conversion/ installation of factory, which was completed at the end of January 2022. The vessel started up snow crab fishing in mid-February.
The companies involved in pelagic fisheries have reported another good year in terms of operations and prices realised for all the fish species for which the company has quotas.
BRBI reported total revenue of NOK 306 million in 2021 (2020: NOK 249 million), EBITDA of NOK 111 million (2020: NOK 103 million) and EBIT of NOK 70 million (2020: NOK 59 million).
BFARM owns seven licences for farming Atlantic salmon in the county of Vestland. The company harvested 8,151 tonnes gutted weight of Atlantic salmon in 2021, up from 6,790 tonnes in 2020. An outbreak of ILA was confirmed at one of the company's localities in June. The fish concerned were 1-2 kg in size when they were slaughtered in the third quarter. The mandatory slaughter has severely impacted the company's earnings. The company sells all its fish in the spot market, and release from stock costs remain high.
BFARM posted total revenue for 2021 of NOK 432 million (2020: NOK 306 million), EBITDA of NOK 52 million (2020: NOK -30 million) and EBIT before fair value adjustment related to biological assets of NOK -12 million (2020: NOK -80 million).
National restrictions to combat the COVID-19 pandemic have had limited impact on pelagic fishery operations, and the seasons have been concluded almost as normal. BFARM's activities have been impacted to only a minor degree by the pandemic.
In the consolidated financial statements, Pelagia Holding AS (Pelagia) is defined as a joint venture and accounted for according to the equity method.
The company's operations comprise production of fishmeal and fish oil as well as production of frozen pelagic consumer products. Pelagia purchases all its raw materials from third parties. The company has production facilities in Norway, the UK and Ireland. In addition, the company owns Hordafor AS, a company that purchases raw materials from the fish farming industry, whitefish industry and pelagic fisheries for production of protein concentrate and oil. Through its subsidiary Epax, Pelagia is a leading manufacturer of Omega-3 products based on marine ingredients. These products are used in dietary supplements and pharmaceutical products.
Pelagia increased its 50% shareholding to become the 100% owner of Hordafor AS on 1 July 2021. In the financial statements, Hordafor AS is reported as a subsidiary from and including the transaction date. The comparative figures for 2020 have not been restated.
Pelagia processed approx. 1.2 million tonnes of raw materials in 2021. The corresponding volume in 2020 was approx. 1.4 million tonnes. The decline in volume is the result of reduced quotas for pelagic species in the North Atlantic in 2021 compared with 2020.
The company reported revenue of NOK 10,001 million in 2021, including a one-off gain of NOK 139 million (2020: NOK 8,814 million), EBITDA of NOK 1,018 million (2020: NOK 655 million) and EBIT of NOK 727 million (2020: NOK 409 million).
National and international restrictions in connection with the COVID-19 outbreak have affected Pelagia's operations. The company's employees have, however, done their utmost to keep the value chain operational at a challenging time, and, to date, operations have continued practically as normal, albeit with a slight increase in costs – particularly relating to the logistics chains.
The company delivers good results, is a significant player in its segment and represents substantial values for AUSS.
At year-end 2021, AUSS had 8,277 shareholders, compared with 7,294 at year-end 2020. The share price at 31 December 2021 was NOK 106.40 per share, compared with NOK 87.70 per share at 31 December 2020. The company's share capital at 31 December 2021 was NOK 101,358,687 divided into 202,717,374 shares, each with a nominal value of NOK 0.50. AUSS owned 893,300 treasury shares.
In the period leading up to the Annual General Meeting in 2022, the Board of Directors is authorised to increase the share capital by issuing 20,271,737 shares. The Board of Directors is further authorised, in the same period, to purchase up to 20,271,737 of AUSS's shares at a price ranging from NOK 20 to NOK 150. A proposal will be made to the company's Annual General Meeting in the spring of 2022 to renew these mandates.
AUSS aims to maximise value creation for the benefit of shareholders by delivering good results. Over time, the target is to pay out between 20% and 40% of the Group's annual profit (excluding the fair value adjustment related to biological assets) as dividends.


The Board of Directors will recommend that the Annual General Meeting approve a dividend payment of NOK 4.50 per share in 2022. The dividend payment for financial year 2020 was NOK 3.50 per share.
The Board of Directors' recommendation reflects the Group's dividend policy, financial strength, strong financial position and projected profit performance in the years ahead.
The total dividend payment for financial year 2021 recommended to the Annual General Meeting to be held on 24 May 2022 is thus NOK 912,228,183. Of this amount, NOK 4,019,850 is dividends payable on treasury shares. The dividend payment is scheduled for 9 June 2022, and the shares will be traded ex dividend from and including 25 May 2022.
The Board of Directors follows the Norwegian Code of Practice for Corporate Governance, issued by NUES, and the UN Global Compact's ten principles for responsible business. The Board of Directors is of the opinion that AUSS is appropriately organised and that its activities are carried out in compliance with relevant legislation and regulations and in accordance with the company's object and Articles of Association. Please refer to the separate chapter on corporate governance in the Annual report and to the company's Sustainability report.
Insurance policies have been taken out for members of the Board of Directors and senior executives to cover their personal liability for compensation for economic loss in connection with exercising their duties (Directors' and management liability). The policies have been taken out at market terms with a highly rated international insurance company.
It is neither possible, nor wholly desirable, to eliminate all the risks related to the Group's activities. The Board of Directors does, however, strive to work systematically to identify risk areas and monitor defined risks within the Group's companies. The Board views risk management as part of the longterm value creation for the company's shareholders, employees and the wider community. Growth opportunities must always be viewed in the context of the Group's overall risk profile.
Identified risks are monitored on a regular basis to ensure that the Group's risk exposure is acceptable. The objective is to ensure that the Group, including each individual company that is part of the Group, is able to increase both its expertise in and awareness of risk identification over time. This requires each company to implement effective routines for risk management, thereby helping ensure that the Group achieves its overall goals. The level of systematic risk identification and risk management varies within the Group's companies.
The Group's diversified company structure and product range, including its geographical spread, will normally limit risk in terms of specific product volatility and business cycles. The Group's internal control and risk management related to the financial reporting process are described in the chapter on corporate governance in the company's Annual report. For the Corporate governance report, please refer to the Annual report for 2021 and the company's Sustainability report for 2021, both available on the company's website: www.auss.no.
2021 was another challenging year, with COVID-related restrictions requiring changes to everyday working life for the Group's employees. Throughout this period, we have maintained a high focus on protecting our employees' health and safety, and the Group companies have worked extremely hard on infection control measures and providing information on remedial measures to prevent infection. For 2021, we must once again praise the effective infection control measures that our companies established to protect employees.
The total number of full-time equivalents in the Group in 2021 was 7,143, of whom 1,916 were in South America. The corresponding figures for 2020 were 6,342 full-time equivalents with 1,781 in South America.
Sick leave in 2021 was 5.8% against a comparative figure of 5.4% for 2020. This development must be seen in light of the global pandemic that affected much of 2021 too.
Female employees are under-represented in the Group's fishing activities and overrepresented within processing. Recent years, however, have seen an increasing percentage of women in what have traditionally been predominantly male professions, for example within fisheries and farming. At the end of 2021, approx. 69% of the Group's employees were men and approx. 31% women. The equivalent figures for 2020 were 68% men and 32% women. There are four women on the company's Board of Directors out of a total of seven, equivalent to a female quota of 57%. In 2020, three of the seven members were women, giving a female quota of 43%.

1 000 000


The Group seeks at all times to ensure equal opportunities and rights for all employees, and to prevent discrimination based on national origin, ethnicity, colour, language, sexual orientation, functional diversity, religion or personal philosophy. The Group also aims to be an inclusive workplace where there is no discrimination on grounds of reduced working capacity. Moreover, the Group attaches importance to preventing harassment and has a zero-tolerance policy in place. The most important markers of harassment are that the behaviour is unwanted, unsolicited and one-way. Harassment can take many different forms, with bullying and sexual harassment the most common.
Additional information can also be found in AUSS's Sustainability report for 2021.
The Group places great emphasis on managing and developing situations that can help increase expertise in and awareness of health, safety and the environment. The Group maintains a strong focus on procedures and compliance with these, as well as measures to safeguard all employees. This work is a perpetual process towards the Group's vision of zero injuries.
The Group's activities in Norway are affiliated with the local company health service. Unwanted events and near-accidents are registered on an ongoing basis in order to prevent future injuries. The focus on reporting and following up unwanted events will help create a safer workplace. There were 237 occupational accidents resulting in sick leave during the year (2020: 222) and 182 occupational accidents without sick leave (2020: 276). An occupational accident in the first quarter of 2021 resulted in an employee losing their life. This extremely tragic event was also discussed in the Group's Annual report for 2020, which was published in April 2021.
Please see also the company's Sustainability report for 2021 for further information on health, safety and the environment, and the company's health and safety guidelines.
Financial and technical resources are deployed to ensure that the Group's activities are conducted in accordance with guidelines established to promote the interests of the company and the environment. The planning and implementation of new technical concepts make vessels, offshore and onshore industry more efficient, easier to operate and more environmentally friendly, thus reducing the health and safety risk for employees.
The processing industry in Norway has implemented quality assurance systems in accordance with regulations issued by the Directorate of Fisheries. The Group's fishmeal and fish oil production in Norway is subject to licensing and is governed by regulations issued by the Norwegian Environment Agency (formerly the Norwegian Climate and Pollution Agency). All of the Group's Peruvian factories have ISO 14001 certification.
AUSS is committed to the sustainable management of fishery resources and actively monitors employee and management compliance with regulations and quota provisions, among other things to help ensure that resources are conserved for future generations. The Group's vessels are principally engaged in fisheries using "active fishing gear" in the form of ring nets and trawls. This means there is only a minimal risk of the Group contributing to the problem of ghost fishing. The Group has two vessels that use bow nets, and loss of this gear could give rise to ghost fishing. The Group's policy is to retrieve lost fishing gear.
Austral has achieved "Friend of the Sea" certification. This is awarded by an independent certification body with detailed knowledge of fishing, and focuses on anchoveta. The accolade is awarded to products that use anchoveta as a raw material and is subject to a rigorous certification process. The certification awarded to Austral covers fishmeal and fish oils, canned products and frozen goods based on Peruvian anchoveta. The certification confirms that the fish stocks are being harvested in accordance with criteria for sustainable fishing, and that the resources are not being overfished (www.friendofthesea.com).
The Marine Stewardship Council (MSC) is an independent, non-profit organisation that seeks to promote responsible fishing in order to ensure sustainable fish stocks. The MSC has developed an environmental standard for sustainable and well-controlled fisheries. The standard is based on three main principles: sustainable fish stocks, minimal impact of fisheries on the ecosystem of which the stocks are part, and effective management. Peru is currently working to gain MSC approval for anchoveta, in addition to "Friend of the Sea" certification.
The stock of horse mackerel is an important resource for the business in Chile and gained MSC certification in 2019. In the North Atlantic, important fish species such as Norwegian spring-spawning herring, North Sea herring, blue whiting, cod, haddock, saithe, shrimps, sand eel, Norway pout and ocean sprat have MSC certification. Unfortunately, disputes on joint quota agreements among the coastal nations that manage the stocks resulted in suspension of MSC certification for Norwegian springspawning herring and blue whiting from 2021. Haddock caught within 12 nautical miles lost its MSC certification in Norway from April 2021, and cod from August 2021. The reason behind the suspension of haddock and cod catches close to the coast is the high number of coastal cod being caught, which the authorities have established as being under pressure.
The Group's fish farming operations are closely linked to the conditions inherent in Norwegian and international waters. Based on a long-term and sustainable perspective, the Group seeks to protect and safeguard the environment in the areas where fish farming is carried out. Environmental aspects are one element of the Group's quality policy and an integral part of the internal control system in the Group's fish farming companies. This applies throughout the value chain from breeding via smolt and grow-out to harvesting, processing and distribution.
The Group's vessels are not considered to cause any pollution to the external environment over and above generally accepted and/or statutory levels. The Group's onshore facilities have purification systems linked to the production process, and operations are regulated by the requirements set for this type of activity. The Group focuses on reducing energy and water consumption, and the Board of Directors does not consider the Group's processing activities cause significant emissions to the external environment. The Group works continuously to minimise energy requirements per kilo of seafood produced in its processing plants. See also the separate chapter on sustainability reporting in the company's Annual report.
Additional information can be found in AUSS's Sustainability report for 2021.
For many years, AUSS has worked actively to follow up its corporate social responsibility as part of daily operations. We therefore find it natural to include our account of this work in our Annual report. This section of the annual report should also be considered in light of the other parts of the Annual report.
The Board of Directors and management maintain a constant focus on corporate social responsibility and work to ensure that all the Group's employees, whatever their roles, are made aware of the need to exercise good social responsibility in their daily work, including that the Group's corporate social responsibility must be manifest in the local communities where AUSS's portfolio companies operate. For AUSS, corporate social responsibility is about achieving commercial profitability without compromising on fundamental ethical values and requirements for operating principles that are sustainable from an environmental and climate perspective.
The subsidiaries Foodcorp in Chile and Austral in Peru are members of the United Nations Global Compact and adhere to its ten principles. Austral also reports according to the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI). The subsidiary LSG has reported in accordance with GRI since 2013 and has prepared a separate Environmental Report that is available in full on the company's website www.leroy.no.
Austevoll Seafood ASA joined the UN's Global Compact initiative in 2020 and adheres to its ten principles. AUSS has also set up a committee for social responsibility and sustainability, made up of three of the board members.
AUSS has implemented a Code of Conduct setting out ethical guidelines for the company's portfolio companies and the conduct of the Group's employees.
All the operating segments report to Group management on a quarterly basis on factors such as health, safety and the environment, the Code of Conduct and whistle-blowing. Any reported non-compliance and/or suspected non-compliance is followed up by the management.
Through its portfolio companies, AUSS is represented in a number of different locations around the world. The Board finds that the Group's operations have a substantially positive impact in the communities where we operate. Our business operations generate local taxes, and provide jobs and social activities. In 2021, the Group continued to actively support local and voluntary organisations in the local communities where it has operations, with a special focus on activities aimed at children and young people.
AUSS has zero tolerance of violations of fundamental human rights and social dumping. The management of the portfolio companies shall follow up to ensure that the companies, by means of their operations, offer the employees terms that, as a minimum, meet local minimum requirements. We also work actively with our business associates and partners to ensure this. AUSS refuses to work with third parties that violate workers' basic rights.
Via its portfolio companies, the Group is a leading producer of Atlantic salmon and trout, and products made from whitefish and pelagic fish. The Group makes a positive contribution to public health, both locally and globally, by producing food that is high in protein and rich in Omega-3, both of which are important elements of a balanced diet for the world's population. Within Atlantic salmon/trout and whitefish, the Group has worked systematically on product development for many years with a view to making its products readily available to consumers and easy to prepare.
Please refer to the separate discussion in the Annual report concerning the impact of operations on the external environment, including the Group's work to mitigate any adverse effects and footprint from its operations.
The Code of Conduct, mentioned above, forbids any employee, directly or through intermediaries, to offer, make, invite or receive payments that contravene Norwegian or international law. Our Code of Conduct also requires an assessment of all the partners in Norway and overseas with which the companies enter into agreements. All the Group's employees are required to report any breach of the Code of Conduct to their line manager. If the matter concerns a superior or the employee cannot contact a superior, it should be reported to the general manager or chair of the board of the relevant company. It is a priority for AUSS that whistle-blowing does not have negative consequences for the person who reports a suspected wrongdoing. The whistle-blower shall be protected to ensure that the matter is investigated as thoroughly as possible. Any incoming reports of corruption will be followed up by the company concerned and/or Group management, which will initiate more detailed investigations. Each report received is routinely submitted to the Board as part of the quarterly compliance reporting. AUSS has zero tolerance for corruption and will continue to work actively vis-à-vis the Group's employees and partners to combat all forms of corruption. The Board expects the Code of Conduct's focus on combating corruption, combined with the ongoing monitoring of the respective operating segments, to have positive outcomes in terms of preventing corruption.
AUSS will contribute to value creation in the local communities of which the parent company and the portfolio companies are a part. AUSS strives for transparency and accuracy in its tax affairs, and to pay taxes where economic value is created. AUSS's country-by-country reporting is carried out by its ultimate parent company, Laco AS, in accordance with the Regulations on country-by-country reporting issued by the Ministry of Finance on 9 December 2016.
Additional information can be found in AUSS's Sustainability report for 2021.
The consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with IFRS, as adopted by the EU.
Group revenue was NOK 26,633 million in 2021, compared with NOK 22,446 million in 2020. Of this figure, other gains and losses amounted to NOK 62 million in 2021, compared with NOK 11 million in 2020.
The Group's operating profit before depreciation and fair value adjustment related to biological assets (EBITDA) came to NOK 4,810 million in 2021, compared with NOK 3,675 million in 2020.
The Group's earnings in 2021 were significantly stronger than in 2020. Good development in demand and higher prices realised, combined with operational improvements, are key factors in the earnings growth.
Operating profit (EBIT) before fair value adjustment related to biological assets was NOK 3,218 million in 2021, against NOK 2,159 million in 2020.
Operating profit after fair value adjustment related to biological assets amounted to NOK 4,332 million in 2021, against NOK 1,205 million in 2020. In 2021, the fair value adjustment of biological assets was positive at NOK 1,114 million. In 2020, the fair value adjustment of biological assets was negative at NOK -954 million.
The largest associates are Pelagia and Norskott Havbruk AS (owner of the Scotland-based fish farming company Scottish Sea Farms Ltd). These companies have reported consistently good results over time and represent significant values for the Group. In 2021, profit from associates totalled NOK 394 million, compared with NOK 250 million in 2020. In 2020, the profit figure included a one-off gain of NOK 70 million.
Net financial expenses were NOK -350 million in 2021, against NOK -427 million in 2020. Profit after tax was NOK 3,437 million in 2021, compared with NOK 823 million in 2020.
The Group's net cash flow from operating activities was NOK 4,635 million in 2021, compared with NOK 2,944 million in 2020. Tax payments totalled NOK 447 million in 2021, compared with NOK 491 million in 2020.
Net cash flow from investing activities in 2021 was negative at NOK -1,650 million. In 2020 it was also negative at NOK -1,403 million. As previously described, in recent years the Group has invested substantial amounts in its core activities, with the biggest single investment in 2021 being the postsmolt facility in Lerøy Midt. The Group has also made acquisitions in Denmark and in the UK via its associate Norskott Havbruk AS. The Group received dividends from associates totalling NOK 114 million in 2021, compared with NOK 130 million in 2020.
Net cash flow from financing activities in 2021 was negative at NOK -2,128 million. The Group paid dividends of NOK 1,335 million in 2021, compared with NOK 983 million in 2020. Net cash flow from financing activities in 2020 was negative at NOK -1,326 million.
At year-end 2021 the Group had bank deposits of NOK 5,329 million, up from NOK 4,463 million at year-end 2020.
At year-end 2021, total assets amounted to NOK 43,781 million, against NOK 39,741 million at year-end 2020.
The Group is financially sound. Book equity at 31 December 2021 totalled NOK 25,187 million, equivalent to an equity ratio in the region of 58%. Equity at 31 December 2020 was NOK 22,991 million, also equivalent to an equity ratio of 58%.
At year-end 2021, the Group had net interestbearing debt of NOK 3,970 million, while the corresponding figure at year-end 2020 was NOK 4,650 million. Including lease liabilities other than to credit institutions of NOK 1,659 million, net interest-bearing debt at year-end 2021 was NOK 5,630 million. The corresponding figure for net interestbearing debt at year-end 2020 was NOK 5,942 million. The Group has good access to external financing on good terms. Over several years, Austevoll Seafood ASA has gained the confidence of the market as an issuer of bond loans. The company aims to be an attractive choice, including for investors who prefer to invest in fixed-income securities.
AUSS is exposed to risk associated with the value of its investments in the portfolio companies in the event of price changes in the markets for raw materials and finished goods, in so far as these bring about changes in the companies' competitiveness and earnings potential over time. Other key parameters are operational conditions and developments in the Group's input factor prices. In the last

Årsberetning 2021


two years we have also observed how pandemics, and the restrictions introduced to combat them, can negatively impact demand and operations in the value chains.
The Group's activities are essentially global and will always be impacted to varying degrees by developments in the global economy. In February 2022 the world bore witness to Russia's invasion of Ukraine. The invasion is causing unimaginable human suffering for those directly involved in the conflict. The conflict we are now experiencing in Europe is also impacting financial markets, exchange rates, supply chains, and the supply and price of input factors. Although this unrest may have negative impacts on the real economy in most markets, it is our opinion that AUSS's core business is founded on assets that are sustainable from a climate, environmental and financial perspective in the long term within viable seafood industries.
The Norwegian seafood industry and the fish-processing industry in Norway and the EU have historically been exposed to the risk represented by the constant threat of longterm political trade barriers imposed by the European Commission. The political trade barriers currently blocking exports of Norwegian salmon and trout to Russia, and the continued complexity of trading with China, provide an illustration of political risk in practice. These barriers represent a shortterm obstacle to the Group's marketing efforts and value creation. However, the market for high-quality seafood is global and is experiencing strong growth. Over time, this growth has largely compensated for political trade barriers, providing grounds for an optimistic outlook and our belief that the Group is well positioned to continue its positive long-term development.
Changes in fishing patterns and quota regulations result in fluctuating catch volumes from quarter to quarter and from year to year, and subsequently in variable utilisation of the Group's production facilities. The seasonal fluctuations in catch volumes create similar fluctuations in the interim key figures. At year-end 2021, the Group had live fish worth NOK 6.2 billion on its statement of financial position. Biological risk has been and will continue to be a substantial risk factor for the Group's operations. Assessing and managing biological risk must therefore be a part of the Group's core expertise.
The approval granted by the Norwegian Ministry of Trade, Industry and Fisheries links the Group's ownership of Havfisk and LNWS to the ownership structure approved when the application was submitted, thereby requiring approval of any changes in ownership not covered by the exemptions granted by the Ministry. The nationality requirement in section 5 of the Act relating to the right to participate in fishing and catches (Participant Act) must also be met. Following the acquisition of Havfisk and LNWS, the Group has substantial exposure in terms of catches of wild fish under Norwegian quotas. The Group faces political risk linked to decisions by the authorities, including framework conditions for fish farming and licence terms related to fisheries legislation in Norway and the other jurisdictions where the company carries out fisheries activity.
Exposure to risk as a result of changes in interest rate levels is identified and assessed on an ongoing basis, as the majority of the Group's debt is at floating interest rates. Through its subsidiaries, the Group has fixedrate agreements for parts of its interest-bearing debt. At year-end 2021, the Group had fixedrate agreements for around 24% of its interest-bearing debt. The Group has always attached importance to long-term collaboration with financial partners. The Group has satisfactory financing in place, and we are of the opinion that the financial covenants fit well with the Group's operations.
The Group is exposed to changes in exchange rates against the Norwegian krone, particularly the Euro, US dollar, Chilean peso and Peruvian sol. Measures to reduce this risk include forward contracts and multi-currency credit facilities. Furthermore, parts of the long-term debt are matched to earnings in the same currency.
The Group seeks to reduce the risk of counterparties being unable to meet their financial obligations by taking out credit insurance where possible and by using guarantees and Letters of Credit, which essentially secure fulfilment of customer commitments. Historically, the Group has had a low level of bad debts, but this may naturally vary from year to year. Credit risk varies over time and between the different operating segments. Credit risk is closely interlinked with developments in the global economy. The Board of Directors is of the opinion that credit risk has increased in recent years.
The Board of Directors of AUSS considers the liquidity in the Group's portfolio companies to be satisfactory.
The Group, including the parent company, has a satisfactory economic and financial position, providing a good foundation for continued operations and further development of the company. The consolidated and parent company financial statements have been prepared on a going concern basis.
Austevoll Seafood ASA is the holding company for the Group. At year-end 2021, the company had three employees and reported zero sick leave in both 2021 and 2020. The company's activities principally involve owning shares in underlying companies. The company's management is actively involved in the operations of the Group companies, taking part in business development, strategy processes, board work etc.
The parent company's financial statements have been prepared in accordance with simplified IFRS.
Revenue reported by the parent company was NOK 1.9 million in 2021, compared with NOK 2.1 million in 2020. The company reported an operating loss of NOK -33.2 million in 2021, compared with NOK -32.3 million in 2020.
Net financial items were positive at NOK 944 million in 2021. The corresponding figure for 2020 was also positive at NOK 760 million. Financial income is essentially dividends from subsidiaries and associates. Financial expenses are essentially interest on external financing.
Profit for the year amounted to NOK 911 million in 2021, compared with NOK 728 million in 2020.
Net cash flow from operating activities for the parent company amounted to NOK -26 million in 2021, compared with NOK -36 million in 2020. Net cash flow from investing activities mainly reflects dividends and Group contributions received, and was positive at NOK 989 million in 2021. Net cash flow from investing activities in 2020 was NOK 634 million.
In 2021, the parent company reported net cash flow from financing activities of NOK -1,349 million. As well as paying dividends of NOK 706 million, the company redeemed a bond loan of NOK 500 million. This was redeemed using parts of the company's cash and cash equivalents. In 2020, the parent company reported a negative net cash flow from financing activities of NOK -583 million, mainly comprising dividend payments of NOK 505 million and ordinary instalments on company debt.
At the start of 2021, the parent company had cash and cash equivalents of NOK 743 million. At year-end 2021, this figure was NOK 358 million.
The parent company has total assets of NOK 5,940 million (2020: NOK 6,292 million). Book equity is NOK 4,395 million (2020: NOK 4,392 million), representing an equity ratio of 74% (2020: 70%).
The parent company's external net interestbearing debt at year-end 2021 was NOK 136 million (2020: NOK 359 million). The parent company had net interest-bearing receivables from subsidiaries at year-end 2021 amounting to NOK 7 million (2020: NOK 171 million).
The parent company's financial statements reflect a profit of NOK 911 million. The Board of Directors proposes that NOK 912 million be allocated to dividend payments (NOK 4.0 million of which as dividends on treasury shares) and NOK 1 million be transferred from other distributable equity.
The parent company has a satisfactory financial position that meets the requirements for a going concern and further development of the company.
The Group's production of redfish currently takes place mainly in Norway. Norwegian and global salmon and trout production are experiencing relatively modest growth, which – combined with a weaker Norwegian krone – has resulted in very high prices. This provides an incentive to start producing salmon in new areas and using new, alternative technologies. These incentives have been in place for a few years now but, for many reasons, Norwegian sea-based production has maintained its global dominance. The harvest volume from land-based production of salmon remains insignificant on the end markets. The market share for Norwegian Atlantic salmon may, in the long term, be affected by production of salmon and trout in new regions and locations. By means of business development, investments and a clear operational focus on competitiveness, the Group shall ensure that its value chain continues to stand strong in the face of competition, including in the long term. As well as developing existing farming operations, the Group is amassing knowledge and/or expertise within both land-based and seabased salmon production.
In recent years, LSG has made significant investments in several parts of the value chain, including expanding facilities for smolt/postsmolt capacity in all the Group's regions. In Lerøy Midt, the first smolt will be released into the new facility on schedule in Q1 2022. This facility represents the final stage of the extension of the plant and will generate growth in Lerøy Midt's harvest volumes from 2023. These investments were made to raise the quality of the company's smolt, increase production by means of better licence utilisation and reduce costs. The investments in the Group's smolt production have been an important driver of the growth in the Group's harvest volume in Norway, which increased from 158,000 tonnes in 2019 to 187,000 tonnes in 2021. At the same time, the new smolt facilities enable significant changes in our operations that will help us realise improvements in the years ahead.
As for the industry as a whole, the Group's costs per kilo of salmon and trout produced have increased significantly over the last 10 years. There are several reasons for this, but the global cost inflation the world is currently experiencing will not make things any easier. In these circumstances, operational efficiency is more important than ever, which is why it has top priority in the work under way within the Group's farming operations.
For its consolidated operations, LSG currently estimates a harvest volume of around 185,000 tonnes in 2022. LSG's share from associates is forecast to be 23,000 tonnes. This includes the expected volume from Scottish Sea Farms Ltd's new acquisition, Grieg Seafood Hjaltland UK Ltd. LSG's total harvest volume in 2022 is therefore estimated to be in the region of 208,000 tonnes, compared with 203,000 tonnes in 2021.
The Group has made significant investments in catching and processing whitefish in recent years. One new vessel was added to the fleet in 2018 – Nordtind – and another in early 2020 – Kongsfjord. Further improvements to fish quality were priority design criteria for Kongsfjord. Consumers' quality expectations and requirements continue to increase. High quality and competitiveness are essential for success when competing for consumers' favour. LSG's target of significantly reducing greenhouse gas emissions makes new demands of technology within the fleet. The Group monitors developments closely and is of course aware of the time-related and technological challenges inherent in the shift from fossil fuels to more sustainable solutions. Developments in the whitefish segment in 2021 were positive. The development in demand has gradually led to higher sales prices at the same time as a number of operational improvements have been successfully implemented in the onshore industry. Prices for relevant whitefish species were significantly higher at the start of 2022 than a year ago. This is a positive development overall but, in the short term, represents a challenging situation for the onshore industry. A substantial increase in raw material prices takes time to recoup in the market, so this factor will negatively impact earnings in the onshore industry for much of 2022. Efforts and investments to make the factories less seasonally dependent continue. Together with structured and meticulous improvement initiatives in each unit, this process is expected to generate results.
The quotas for cod and haddock will be slightly lower in 2022. Work to finalise statistics and transfers from 2021 means that quotas have not yet been set for individual vessels. A reduction in cod quotas of around 20% is expected for the trawler fleet compared with 2021. The reduction for haddock is around 23%, while no change is expected in the quota for saithe fished in the zone north of 62 degrees latitude. As well as the quota changes, Lerøy Havfisk's catch volumes will be impacted by around 1,350 tonnes of the 2021 cod quota having been transferred to 2022. The fact that the coastal fleet, too, transferred quota from 2021 to 2022 is also positive for the onshore industry.
LSG works to consistently develop a more efficient and more sustainable value chain for seafood – a value chain that not only provides cost-efficient solutions, but also quality, availability, a high level of service, traceability and competitive climate-related and environmental solutions. Investments in recent years, including in a new industrial facility for Lerøy Midt, a new factory in Stamsund, and new factories in Spain, the Netherlands and Italy that are still in the running-in phase, will make a positive contribution in the years to come.
Norskott Havbruk AS's acquisition of Grieg Seafood Hjaltland UK Ltd, via Scottish Sea Farms, was completed in December 2021. The company operates in Shetland, a region that SSF knows very well and, although it will take time, SSF is expected to realise significant synergies by integrating the two companies.
According to the IFFO*, fishmeal production from Regions Peru, Chile and the North Atlantic increased by 3.1% in 2021 compared with 2020. The increase in production stems from Peru and Chile, at 15.3% and 6.5% respectively, while there was a 26.9% reduction in production in the North Atlantic compared with 2020.
The quota for the second anchoveta season in Peru in 2021 was 2.05 million tonnes, and the season started on 15 November. At the end of the season in mid-January 2022, 99% of the total quota had been caught. The main reason behind the lower production in the North Atlantic in 2021 compared with 2020 was the reduction in blue whiting and sand eel quotas from 2020 to 2021.
ICES's recommended quota for blue whiting in 2022 represents a reduction of 19% on the recommended quota for 2021. The quota for capelin off Iceland has been increased significantly relative to 2021. The quota for 2022 is 904,000 tonnes, up from 127,000 tonnes in 2021.
*Source: IFFO, week 52, 2021 (Regions Chile, Peru, Denmark/Norway, Iceland/North Atlantic)
The Group's production of consumer products takes place in Europe and South America. In Europe, the fishing season for Norwegian spring-spawning herring is usually from January to April and the season for North Sea herring from May onwards. The main season for mackerel fishing is during the autumn and normally starts in September, not in early August as in 2021. The remaining




quotas for Norwegian spring-spawning herring are also caught during this period. The first half of the year is the season for horse mackerel in South America.
ICES's recommended quota for catches in the North Atlantic in 2022 implies reduced catches of mackerel and Norwegian springspawning herring compared with the recommended quota for 2021. The reduction for these two species is 7% and 8% respectively. However, ICES's recommended quota for North Sea herring in 2022 reflects a catch increase of a full 45% compared with the recommended quota for 2021. ICES has also recommended catches of up to 70,000 tonnes of capelin in the Barents Sea in 2022. For 2021, ICES recommended a ban on capelin fishing in the Barents Sea. The 2022 quota recommended by SPRFMO for horse mackerel catches in the South Pacific represents a continuation of the positive development in these fisheries seen in recent years, with the decision made to increase the quota by approx. 15% compared with 2021. The 2021 quota also increased by 15% relative to 2020.
The Group is financially sound, has shown positive development and is currently well positioned in several parts of the global seafood industry. The Group's products are healthy and delicious, and production is sustainable from a financial, climate and environmental perspective.
The Group's strategy going forward is to continue to grow and further develop within its current operating segments. The Group has and shall continue to have the financial flexibility to support its strategy of further organic growth, carry out strategic acquisitions
and sustain the company's dividend policy.
Over the years, the Board of Directors and management have focused on building a strong group of companies, which includes ensuring that the Group has organisations ready to solve challenges in difficult and changeable conditions. The management and Group employees are doing what they can every day to ensure that the Group fulfils its underlying social responsibility by keeping the value chain and food supplies operational in challenging times.
The Board of Directors underlines that uncertainties related to assessments of future developments remain higher than normal. In the second half of 2021, demand for seafood returned to historically high levels, driven in particular by strong demand in the retail sector but also by the gradual positive development in the HoReCa sector as COVIDrelated restrictions eased. At the same time, the Group is experiencing rising prices for key input factors, which will impact cost developments in 2022. Nonetheless, the Board of Directors is confident that the Group is well positioned for the years ahead.
Storebø, 22 April 2022 The Board of Directors of Austevoll Seafood ASA
Hege Solbakken Arne Møgster Board member CEO
Helge Singelstad Helge Møgster Hege Charlotte Bakken Chairman of the Board Board member Deputy Chairman of the Board
Siren M. Grønhaug Eirik Drønen Melingen Lill Maren Møgster Board member Board member Board member


Adopted by the Board of Directors on the 29th of August 2006 and updated with effect from 22nd of April 2022.
AUSTEVOLL SEAFOOD ASA ("AUSS" or the "Company"), is a holding company and the parent company in AUSS' group of portfolio companies ("the Group"). It is established and registered in Norway and governed by Norwegian law. The Company's aim is to observe all relevant laws and regulations, and the Norwegian recommendation for corporate governance. This also applies for all other companies within the Group, and consequently this document applies to the extent reasonable for all companies therein.
In 2006 the Company adopted its first formal Corporate Governance Policy. The Board of Directors have later examined revised versions of the Norwegian Code of Practice for Corporate Governance (the "Code of Practice"), published by the Norwegian Corporate Governance Board ("NUES"), and has approved and adopted this as the Company's Corporate Governance Policy. The Company is obliged to act in compliance with laws and regulations as applicable from time to time in respect of handling and control of insider trading rules and information to the shareholders and the market. The latest revision to the Code of Practice was published by NUES on the 14th of October 2021 (www.nues.no), and the Company's current Corporate Governance Policy is effective as of that date. This fully reflects the Board's approval of the Code of Practice without reservations.
This governing document contains measures which have been and will be implemented to secure efficient management and control of the activities of the Company. The main objective is to establish and maintain systems for communication, surveillance and incentives which will increase and maximize the financial results of the Company, its long-term soundness and overall success, and investment return for its shareholders. The development and improvement of the Company's Corporate Governance is a continuous and important process, on which the Board of Directors and the Executive Management keep a keen focus.
The Company is a public limited company listed on the Oslo Stock Exchange. In that respect the Company is subject to the corporate governance regulations contained in the Public Limited Companies Act 1997 (asal.), the Securities Trading Act 2007 (vphl.), the Market Abuse Regulation (MAR), the Issuer Rules for Oslo Børs (Issuer Rules) and other applicable legislation and regulations. The Company endorses the Code of Practice issued by NUES most recently revised on the 14th of October 2021.
Management of and control over the Company is divided between the shareholders, represented through the general meeting of the shareholders, the Board of Directors and the Managing Director (CEO) in accordance with applicable legislation.
The Company has an external and independent auditor.
The Board of Directors must ensure that the Company implements sound corporate governance.
The Board of Directors must provide a report on the Company's corporate governance in the directors' report or in a document that is referred to in the directors' report. The report on the Company's corporate governance must cover every section of the Code of Practice.
If the Company does not fully comply with the Code of Practice, the Company must provide an explanation of the reason for the deviation and what solution it has selected. The Board has decided to follow the Code of Practice from NUES and the Group has drawn up a separate policy for Corporate Governance. Any deviations from the Code of Practice are included in this corporate governance statement.
Deviation from the Code of Practice : None
The Company's articles of association shall clearly describe the business that the Company shall operate.
The Board of Directors shall define clear objectives, strategies and risk profiles for the Company's business activities such that the Company creates value for shareholders in a sustainable manner. When carrying out this work, the Board of Directors shall therefore take into account financial, social and environmental considerations.
The Board of Directors shall evaluate these objectives, strategies and risk profiles at least yearly. The objective of the Company is to be engaged in production, trade and service industry, including fish farming, fishing operations and ship owning business and any business related thereto, including investments in other companies with similar objects.
These statements appear in § 3 of Austevoll Seafood ASA's articles of association.
The Company's vision is to be a "Passionate owner of globally leading seafood companies", and the business strategy for the Company is long-term value creation via sustainable, competent use of freshwater resources and the oceans, in thriving local communities.
The value chain in the Company's portfolio companies "originates" from sustainable use of the sea, and the Group is a world leader within the production of Atlantic salmon and trout, and also whitefish, covering the entire value chain from egg and catches to final product to consumer. The Group`s pelagic operations comprise fisheries, production of fishmeal and fish oil, and production of pelagic products for human consumption. The Group's growth has been and shall continue to be both financially and climate/environmentally sustainable. Sustainable growth places stringent requirements on the Company and the Group within finance, corporate governance, climate and environment, in addition to social issues. In its sustainability reports, the Board of Directors have identified and assessed the following focus areas of sustainability as relevant for AUSS and its portfolio companies:
For further information: https://auss.no/ sustainability/sustainability-report/
AUSS takes a very conscious approach to its responsibility for ethical conduct, society at large and the environment. The Company has prepared a set of ethical guidelines (Code of Conduct) that applies to AUSS and the portfolio companies (the Group) and all Group employees, aiming to establish common principles and regulations. The Code of Conduct are used as a basis when collaboration with suppliers and business partners are entered. The Company's Code of Conduct, annual risk assessment and follow up routines, will be part of the preparation to ensure Compliance with the Transparency Act. AUSS Code of Conduct reflect the values represented by the Company and guide the Group employees to make use of the correct principles for business conduct, impartiality, conf lict of interest, political activity, entertaining customers, processing information and duty of confidentiality, relationships with business partners, corruption, whistle blowing, bribes etc. Each Group employee is individually responsible for practicing the ethical guidelines. The Company has prepared an Ethics Test for employees which will help them to make the right decisions whenever needed. In addition to the Code of Conduct AUSS has prepared a wide range of policies, which provide additional, and more detailed, guidance and requirements for expected business conduct related to the principles addressed herein. Such policies are applicable to all Group employees and also reflect standards that are expected to be implemented and adhered by all portfolio companies. The Company management is responsible for ensuring compliance with the regulations. To govern this the Company has established a Governance model.
Deviations from the Code of Practice: None
The Board of Directors shall ensure that the Company has a capital structure that is appropriate to the Company's objective, strategy and risk profile.
The Board of Directors shall establish and disclose a clear and predictable dividend policy.
The background to any proposal for the Board of Directors to be given a mandate to approve the distribution of dividends shall be explained.
Mandates granted to the Board of Directors to increase the Company's share capital or to purchase own shares shall be intended for a defined purpose. Such mandates shall be limited in time to no later than the date of the next annual general meeting.
The Company's need for financial strength is considered at any time in the light of its objective, strategy and risk profile. The Board of Directors considers consolidated equity to be satisfactory.
The goal is, over time, to pay out 20% to 40% of the Group's net profit (ex. fair value adjustment of biological assets) as dividend.
The Board has the authority until the ordinary general meeting in 2022 to increase the share capital by issuing up to 20,271,737 shares.
The Board has the authority, until the ordinary general meeting in 2022, to purchase treasury shares in Austevoll Seafood ASA limited to 10% of the Company's share capital. Shares may not be purchased for less than NOK 20 per share, and no more than NOK 150 per share.
At 31st of December 2021, AUSS directly owned 893,300 treasury shares.
Deviations from the Code of Practice: None
Any decision to waive the pre-emption rights of existing shareholders to subscribe for shares in the event of an increase in share capital shall be justified. Where the Board of Directors resolves to carry out an increase in share capital and waive the pre-emption rights of existing shareholders on the basis of a mandate granted to the Board, the justification shall be publicly disclosed in a stock exchange announcement issued in connection with the increase in share capital.
Any transactions the Company carries out in its own shares shall be carried out either through the stock exchange or at prevailing stock exchange prices if carried out in any other way. If there is limited liquidity in the Company's shares, the Company shall consider other ways to ensure equal treatment of all shareholders.
The Board's authorisation to acquire treasury shares is based on the assumption that the acquisition will take place in the open market. Acquired shares may be disposed in the market or used as payments for acquisitions.
Deviations from the Code of Practice: None
The Company shall not limit any party's ability to own, trade or vote for shares in the Company.
The Company shall provide an account of any restrictions on owning, trading or voting for shares in the Company.
The articles of association place no restrictions on negotiability. The shares are freely negotiable.
Deviations from the Code of Practice: None
The Board of Directors shall ensure that the Company's shareholders can participate in the general meeting.
The Board of Directors shall ensure that:
Shareholders shall be able to vote on each individual matter, including on each individual candidate nominated for election. Shareholders who cannot attend the meeting in person shall be given the opportunity to vote. The Company shall design the form for the appointment of a proxy to make voting on each individual matter possible and shall nominate a person who can act as a proxy for shareholders.
The annual general meeting is held each year no later than six months after the end of each financial year. Notification will be in accordance with the Public Companies Act and the General Meeting Regulations which stipulate deadlines for the notice calling a general meeting, the content of the notice and the availability of documents to be considered at the meeting. All relevant documentation is available on the Group's website at least 21 days prior to the general meeting. The Financial Calendar is published on the internet and through a notification to Oslo Stock Exchange.
The Public Companies Act allows the Board of Directors to choose whether to hold a general meeting as a physical meeting or as an electronic meeting.
It is possible to register by post or e-mail. Shareholders will be able to vote on each individual matter, including on each individual candidate nominated for election. Shareholders who cannot attend the meeting in person will be given the opportunity to vote through proxy. The Company will in this respect provide information on the procedure and design/prepare the form for the appointment of a proxy to make voting on each individual matter possible and should nominate a person who can act as a proxy for shareholders.
The chairman of the Board of Directors attends the general meetings. Other members of the board are entitled to attend. The chairman of the nomination committee should attend the annual general meeting in order to present the committee's recommendations and answer any questions.
Deviations from the Recommendations: In 2021 three out of the seven Board members attended the general meeting. In 2021 none of the members of the nomination committee attended the general meeting. By agreement with the chairman of the nomination committee, the Chairman of the board presented the committee's recommendation.
The Company shall have a nomination committee, and the nomination committee shall be laid down in the Company's articles of association.
The general meeting shall stipulate guidelines for the duties of the nomination committee, elect the chairperson and members of the nomination committee, and determine the committee's remuneration.
The nomination committee shall have contact with shareholders, the Board of Directors and the Company's executive personnel as part of its work on proposing candidates for election to the Board.
The members of the nomination committee shall be selected to take into account the interests of shareholders in general. The majority of the committee shall be independent of the Board of Directors and the executive personnel. The nomination committee shall not include any executive personnel or any member of the Company's Board of Directors.
The nomination committee's duties shall be to propose candidates for election to the Board of Directors and nomination committee and to propose the fees to be paid to members of these bodies.
The nomination committee shall justify why it is proposing each candidate separately.
The Company shall provide information on the membership of the committee and any deadlines for proposing candidates.
According to the Articles of Association § 6 the Company shall have a nomination committee. The nomination committee shall issue a proposal to the general meeting regarding the election of shareholder elected Board members. The nomination committee shall consist of three members. The members of the committee shall be elected by the Company's annual general meeting, which also appoints the committee's chairman. The members of the nomination committee are elected by the general meeting for terms of two years at a time. The general meeting determines the remuneration of the committee's members.
The current committee was elected on the AGM on 27th of May 2021 and consists of:
Hilde Drønen holds a master degree from Business School of Management (BI) and a MBA from Norwegian School of Economics (NHH). She has been the CFO of DOF ASA since 2004. She held the position as CFO in Bergen Yards (Bergen Group ASA/Endur ASA) from 2002 to September 2004 and has before that held various senior positions in the Møgster Group. She has more than 30 years of experience in the oil service industry. In addition to several directorships in companies within the DOF Group, she has several directorships in external companies within the energy sector (Oil & Gas and Renewables).
Mr. Hollekim has a degree in Business Administration. He has worked as a portfolio manager/analyst for 36 years, including Norwegian fund management companies until 2012. He spent 15 years working as a portfolio manager for ODIN Forvaltning AS. The last 10 years Mr. Hollekim has been working as a portfolio manager in a family office.
Nina Sandnes graduated with a Bachelor of Law degree from the University of Oslo, and has 25 years of experience within business law and core competencies within consultation and procedure associated with labour legislation. Her former work experience is as a lawyer and associate attorney in the local union for the financial industry and at Kluge Advokatfirma. She is currently a partner at Kluge. Nina Sandnes also has experience of board work from a number of companies, and is a partner-elected board member for Kluge.
The general meeting has not yet established specific guidelines for the nomination committee. However, the composition of the nomination committee is such that the interests of the shareholders in general are taken into
account in that the majority within the committee is independent of the Board and other executive personnel. The nomination committee does not include any executive personnel or any member of the Company's Board of Directors.
Deviations from the Code of Practice: None
The composition of the Board of Directors shall ensure that the Board can attend to the common interests of all shareholders and meets the Company's need for expertise, capacity and diversity. Attention shall be paid to ensuring that the Board can function effectively as a collegiate body.
The composition of the Board of Directors shall ensure that it can operate independently of any special interests. The majority of the shareholder-elected members of the Board shall be independent of the Company's executive personnel and material business contacts. At least two of the members of the Board elected by shareholders shall be independent of the Company's main shareholder(s).
The Board of Directors shall not include executive personnel. If the Board does include executive personnel, the Company shall provide an explanation for this and implement consequential adjustments to the organisation of the work of the Board, including the use of Board committees to help ensure more independent preparation of matters for discussion by the Board, cf. Section 9 of the Code of Practice.
The general meeting shall elect the chairman of the Board of Directors.
The term of office for members of the Board of Directors shall not be longer than two years at a time.
The annual report shall provide information to illustrate the expertise of the members of the Board of Directors, and information on their record of attendance at board meetings. In addition, the annual report shall identify which members are considered to be independent.
Members of the Board of Directors shall be encouraged to own shares in the Company.
According to the Articles of Association § 6 The Company's Board of Directors shall consist of 5–7 directors elected by the shareholders. Austevoll Seafood ASA has endeavoured to adapt directors' backgrounds, competence, capacity and affiliation to the Group's business activities and its need for diversity.
The Board of Directors consists of the following persons:
Helge Singelstad has been member of the Board since 2008 and has been the Chairman of the Board since May 2010. Mr. Singelstad is the CEO in Laco AS, the major shareholder in Austevoll Seafood ASA and DOF ASA. He holds a degree in Computer Engineering from Bergen University College (HiB), a degree in Business Administration from the Norwegian School of Economics (NHH) and a 1st degree of Law from the University of Bergen (UiB). He serves on numerous Boards of Directors and is Chairman of the Board at Lerøy Seafood Group ASA and Pelagia Holding AS. Mr. Singelstad has extensive experience from various types of businesses such as oil & gas and seafood sector.
Hege Charlotte Bakken has been member of the Board since 2018, and has been the Deputy Chairman of the Board since 2021. She holds an MSc degree from the Norwegian University of Life Sciences and an Executive MBA from ESCP Europe Business School in Paris. Ms. Bakken is Senior Advisor within strategy and management in Stella Polaris, Netherlands and Director in Marvesa Holding NV, a Dutch investment firm. She previously held positions as Senior Advisor at Hemingway Corporate Finance, Amsterdam, Chief Operating Officer of Marvesa Holding N.V. and Managing Director of Marvesa Rotterdam N.V. She previously fulfilled management roles in Pronova BioPharma Norge ASA, FishMarket International AS, Frionor AS and Norway Seafoods ASA. Ms. Bakken has served as a member of the boards of Lerøy Seafood Group ASA, Pronova Biopharma ASA and Pronova BioPharma Norge AS.
Lill Maren Møgster has been member of the Board since 2012. Ms. Møgster is one of the main owners in Laco AS, the main shareholder of Austevoll Seafood ASA and DOF ASA. She is educated Bachelor of Management from the Norwegian Business School (BI) and holds a Master of Strategy and Management (NHH). Ms. Møgster is experienced within sales and finance after having worked in various subsidiaries of Laco AS since 2007. She holds board positions in several companies. Lill Maren Møgster owns shares in Austevoll Seafood ASA indirectly through Laco AS.
Helge Møgster has been member of the Board since the Company was founded in April 1981, and served as Chairman of the Board until May 2006. Mr. Møgster is one of the main owners in Laco AS, the main shareholder of Austevoll Seafood ASA and DOF ASA. Mr. Møgster has extensive experience from all aspects of the fisheries sector. Additionally, he knows the offshore service sector very well. He is holding board positions in several companies.
Siren Merete Grønhaug has been member of the Board since 2014. Ms. Grønhaug graduated as a Business Economist from the Norwegian School of Economics (NHH) and has additional training through the AFF Solstrand management development programme and at BI Norwegian Business School. She is the Group director HR of Lerøy Seafood Group ASA, and was previously CFO of Lerøy Seafood AS. She has broad knowledge in the seafood sector after many years of experience at executive levels in Lerøy. Ms. Grønhaug has extensive board experience from various companies in Lerøy Seafood Group ASA.
Eirik Drønen Melingen has been member of the Board since 2017. Mr. Melingen has a bachelor degree in Marine technology from Bergen University College and a Masters Degree in Offshore Floating Systems from University of Strathclyde. Mr. Melingen has experience from offshore shipping companies with specialized vessels within Subsea, Marine Seismic, Offshore Supply and Seismic Support.
Hege Solbakken has been member of the Board since May 2021. She holds an MSc degree in Comparative Politics from the University in Bergen (UiB), specializing in international politics and additional studies in Business & Human Rights (UiB) and Corporate Governance (BI). She has served as Chief of Staff and State Secretary in the Ministry of Transportation and the Ministry of Municipalities and Regions, as State Secretary in the Prime Minister's office, and as political adviser with the Ministry of Fisheries and Coastal Affairs. Ms. Solbakken has been leader of the Maritime Forum Norway and CEO in the Offshore Media Group and has worked with Board and Executive selection in Visindi. She now heads Jefferson Wells Norway and holds board positions in Voss Veksel og Landmandsbank ASA, and in other organisations.
Except for the Chairman Helge Singelstad, Lill Maren Møgster, Eirik Drønen Melingen and Helge Møgster, all members of the Board are independent of the Company's major shareholders, the Company's management and the Company's main business relations. There are no conflicts of interest between any duties to the Company of the members of the Board or the Company's management, and their private interests or other duties.
No members of Group management are Directors.
Deviations from the Code of Practice: None
The Board of Directors shall issue instructions for its own work as well as for the executive management with particular emphasis on clear internal allocation of responsibilities and duties.
These instructions shall state how the Board of Directors and executive management shall handle agreements with related parties, including whether an independent valuation must be obtained. The Board of Directors shall also present any such agreements in their annual directors' report.
The Board of Directors shall ensure that members of the Board of Directors and executive personnel make the Company aware of any material interests that they may have in items to be considered by the Board of Directors.
In order to ensure a more independent consideration of matters of a material character in which the chairman of the Board is, or has been, personally involved, the Board's consideration of such matters shall be chaired by some other member of the Board.
The Public Companies Act stipulates that the Company must have an audit committee. The entire Board of Directors shall not act as the Company's audit committee. In addition to the legal requirements on the composition of the audit committee etc., the majority of the members of the committee shall be independent of the Company.
The Board of Directors shall also consider appointing a remuneration committee in order to help ensure thorough and independent preparation of matters relating to compensation paid to the executive personnel. Membership of such a committee shall be restricted to members of the Board who are independent of the Company's Executive personnel.
The Board of Directors shall provide details in the annual report of any board committees appointed.
The Board of Directors shall evaluate its performance and expertise annually.
In total 6 Board meetings have been arranged during 2021.
Norwegian law lays down the tasks and responsibilities of the Board of Directors. These include overall management and supervision for the Company. Towards the end of each year the Board adopts a detailed plan for the following financial year. This plan covers the follow-up of the Company's operations, internal control, strategy development and other issues. The Company complies with the deadlines issued by Euronext Oslo Stock Exchange with regards to interim reports.
The Board's instructions are extensive and were last revised on 16th of February 2022. The instructions cover the following points: the Boards responsibly and obligations, the CEO's information obligations to the Board, and the procedures of the Board. The board instruction outline how the Board of Directors and executive management shall handle agreements with related parties. In the event of a not immaterial transaction the Board of Directors will arrange for a valuation to be
| Elected to the | Number Board | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Members | Board | Up for election | meetings 2021 |
| Helge Singelstad (Chairman) | 2008 | 2022 | 6/6 |
| Oddvar Skjegstad (Deputy Chairman until May 2021)* | 2006 | 3/3 | |
| Hege Charlotte Bakken (Deputy Chairman from May 2021)* | 2018 | 2022 | 6/6 |
| Helge Møgster | 2010 | 2022 | 6/6 |
| Lill Maren Møgster | 2012 | 2022 | 6/6 |
| Siren M. Grønhaug* | 2014 | 2023 | 6/6 |
| Eirik Drønen Melingen | 2017 | 2023 | 5/6 |
| Hege Solbakken* | 2021 | 2023 | 3/3 |
* Independent of the Company`s major shareholders
obtained from an independent third party. Exceptions can be made for agreements entered as part of the Company's normal business and which is based on customary business terms and principles. The Board of directors will present any such agreements in their annual directors' report.
See note 25 for related party transactions.
The Nomination Committee is governed by the Articles of Association. The Board established an Audit Committee at the end of 2008. The Board established a Committee for Social Responsibility and Sustainability in 2020. The committees are solely responsible to the full corporate Board and their authority is limited to making recommendations to the Board, however the Nomination Committee makes recommendations for election of Board Members to the general meeting of shareholders.
The Audit committee has responsibilities related to financial reporting, the independent auditor and risk management and consists of two Board members. The independent auditor usually attends the meetings. The CEO and other directors are entitled to attend if the audit committee so desire. Instructions to the Audit committee are extensive and were last revised on 10th of December 2021.
Members: Hege Charlotte Bakken and Lill Maren Møgster.
In total the audit committee had 7 meetings in 2021.
The Committee for Social Responsibility and Sustainability has extended responsibility for the Company`s social responsibility and sustainability, and to pursue and monitor the development of this ambition further.
Members: Hege Charlotte Bakken, Lill Maren Møgster and Siren Grønhaug.
In total the committee for Social Responsibility and Sustainability had 2 meetings in 2021.
Each year, a special Board meeting shall be organised on topics related to the Groups operations and the Board's duties and working methods.
Deviations from the Code of Practice: None
The Board of Directors must ensure that the Company has sound internal control and systems for risk management that are appropriate in relation to the extent and nature of the Company's activities.
The Board of Directors shall carry out an annual review of the Company's most important areas of exposure to risk and its internal control arrangements.
The Group's activities are varied, depending on each portfolio company`s position in the value chain, and consequently require differentiated forms of management and follow-up.
Good internal management systems are essential for success, and these must be continuously developed in order to accommodate changing economic conditions. The internal control is based on daily and weekly reports that are summarized into monthly reports tailored to the individual Company, while at the same time providing satisfactory reporting at Group level. There is an emphasis on the importance of uniform reporting procedures and formats in order to ensure correct reporting from all companies and up to an aggregate level.
A significant volume of the work of the Board of Directors is ensuring that the Company management is familiar with and understands the Group's risk areas and that risk is managed by means of appropriate internal control. Frequent valuations and assessments are conducted of both the management's and Board's understanding of risk and internal control. The audit committee plays an important role in these valuations and assessments.
Internal control within the Group is based on the recommendation from the "Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commissions" (COSO), and covers control environment, risk assessment, control activities, information and communication, and monitoring. The content of these different elements is described in detail below.
The core of an enterprise is the employees' individual skills, ethical values and competence, in addition to the environment in which they work.
On behalf of the CFO, the Chief Accountant for the Group provides guidelines to entities within the Group. These guidelines place requirements on both the content of and process for financial reporting.
The Chief Accountant for the Group reports to the CFO and is responsible for areas such as financial reporting, budgets and internal control of financial reporting within the Group. The Directors of the portfolio companies which issue the reports are responsible for continuous financial monitoring and reporting. The companies all have management groups and financial functions which are adapted to their organisations and business activities. The companies managers shall ensure implementation of an appropriate and efficient internal control and are responsible for compliance with requirements.
The audit committee shall monitor the process of financial reporting and ensure that the Group's internal control and risk management systems function efficiently. The audit committee shall also ensure that the Group has an independent and efficient external auditor.
The financial statements for all companies in the Group are audited by an external auditor, within the framework established in international standards for auditing and quality control.
The Chief Accountant for the Group and the CFO identify, assess and monitor the risk of errors in the Group's financial reports, together with the managers of each company.
The portfolio companies which issue reports are responsible for the implementation of sufficient control actions in order to prevent errors in the financial reports.
Processes and control measures have been established to ensure quality assurance of financial reports. These measures comprise mandates, division of work, reconciliation/ documentation, IT controls, analyses, management reviews and Board representation within subsidiaries.
The Chief Accountant for the Group provides guidelines for financial reporting to the different Group entities.
The Chief Accountant for the Group ensures that reporting takes place in accordance with prevailing legislation, accounting standards, established accounting principles and the Board's guidelines.
The Chief Accountant and the CFO continuously assess the Group's and the segments' financial reports. Analyses are carried out in relation to previous periods, between different entities and in relation to other companies within the same industry.
The Group management reviews the financial reports on a monthly basis, with the review including the development in figures for profit/loss and balance sheet.
The audit committee and Board review the Group's financial reports on a quarterly basis. During such reviews, the audit committee has discussions with the management and external auditor. At least once a year, the Board holds a meeting with the external auditor, without the presence of the administration.
The Board reviews the interim accounts per quarter and the proposal for the financial statements. The financial statements are adopted by the general meeting.
The Group strongly emphasises correct and open information to shareholders, potential shareholders and other interested parties. Ref. item 13 "I n for mat ion a nd communications" for more detailed information.
Those persons responsible for reporting companies shall ensure appropriate and efficient internal control in accordance with requirements, and are responsible for compliance with such requirements.
The Chief Accountant and CFO review the financial reports issued by the companies and the Group, and assess any errors, omissions and required improvements.
The external auditor shall provide the audit committee with a description of the main elements of the audit from the previous

financial year, including and in particular significant weak points identified during internal control related to the process of financial reporting.
The Board, represented by the audit committee, monitors the process of financial reporting.
Deviations from the Code of Practice: None
The remuneration of the Board of Directors shall reflect the Board's responsibility, expertise, time commitment and the complexity of the Company's activities.
The remuneration of the Board of Directors shall not be linked to the Company's performance. The Company shall not grant share options to members of its Board.
Members of the Board of Directors and/or companies with which they are associated shall not take on specific assignments for the Company in addition to their appointment as a member of the Board. If they do nonetheless take on such assignments this shall be disclosed to the full Board. The remuneration for such additional duties shall be approved by the Board.
Any remuneration in addition to normal directors' fees shall be specifically identified in the annual report.
For remuneration in addition to normal directors' fees see note 20.
The Directors fees are decided by the AGM. The Directors' fees are not linked to the Company's performance.
None of the Board members have during 2021 had assignments for the Company in addition to being members of the Board.
Deviations from the Code of Practice in 2021: None
The guidelines on the salary and other remuneration for executive personnel must be clear and easily understandable, and they must contribute to the Company's commercial strategy, long-term interests and financial viability.
The Company's arrangements in respect of salary and other remuneration shall help ensure the executive personnel and shareholders have convergent interests and shall be simple.
Performance-related remuneration shall be subject to an absolute limit.
The Company's guidelines for determining remunerations to the CEO and other executive personnel (the Guidelines) shall at all times support prevailing strategy and values in the Company. Remuneration to members of the Company's executive management is vital for harmonising the Company's interests with the interests of the leading personnel. The main purpose of the Guidelines is to allow shareholders to influence the parameters of the salary and other kinds of remuneration, creating a culture for remuneration that promotes the Company's long-term interests, business strategy while ensuring shareholders influence and the Company's financial sustainability. The Guidelines shall be in accordance with the provisions of the Public Limited Companies Act section 6-16 (a), supplemented by the Norwegian Regulation regarding guidelines and reporting on remuneration of executive management dated 11th of December 2020. The Guidelines shall be submitted to the General Meeting for approval every four years. For each financial year, the Board of Directors shall ensure that a remuneration report is prepared in accordance with the provisions of the Public Limited Companies Act section 6-16 (b) and relevant regulations, providing a total overview of paid and outstanding salaries and remuneration covered by the Guidelines.
The Guidelines have been prepared by the Board of Directors and approved by the annual general meeting in 2021. See note 20 for the Guidelines and webpage www.auss.no
A report on salary and other remuneration to the executive personnel will be prepared in accordance with the Public Limited Companies Act section 6-16 (b) and relevant regulations.
Deviations from the Code of Practice in 2021: None
The Board of Directors shall establish guidelines for the Company's reporting of financial and other information based on openness and taking into account the requirement for equal treatment of all participants in the securities market.
The Board of Directors shall establish guidelines for the Company's contact with shareholders other than through general meetings.
The Company strongly emphasises correct and open information to shareholders, potential shareholders and other interested parties. The Company has presented quarterly reports with financial information since 2006.
The Company's most important medium for distributing information will be the Oslo Stock Exchange reporting system, but the Company also aims to present such information directly to investors and analysts.
The Company aims to keep its shareholders informed via annual reports, quarterly reports and at appropriate presentations. In addition, press releases will be sent out regarding important events.
Every year, the Company publishes the Company's financial calendar, showing the dates for presentation of the interim financial statements and the date of the annual general meeting.
The Company's website is updated constantly with information distributed to shareholders. The Company's website is at: www.auss.no.
Separate guidelines have been drawn up for handling of inside information, i.e. Instructions for handling of inside information and Instructions for primary insiders, in accordance with MAR entered into force in Norway on 1st March 2021.
Deviations from the Code of Practice: None
The Board of Directors shall establish guiding principles for how it will act in the event of a take-over bid.
In a bid situation, the Company's Board of Directors and management have an independent responsibility to help ensure that shareholders are treated equally, and that the Company's business activities are not disrupted unnecessarily. The Board has a particular responsibility to ensure that shareholders are given sufficient information and time to form view of the offer.
The Board of Directors shall not hinder or obstruct take-over bids for the Company's activities or shares.
Any agreement with the bidder that acts to limit the Company's ability to arrange other bids for the Company's shares shall only be entered into where it is self-evident that such an agreement is in the common interest of the Company and its shareholders. This provision shall also apply to any agreement on the payment of financial compensation to the bidder if the bid does not proceed. Any financial compensation shall be limited to the costs the bidder has incurred in making the bid.
Agreements entered into between the Company and the bidder that are material to the market's evaluation of the bid shall be publicly disclosed no later than at the same time as the announcement that the bid will be made is published.
In the event of a take-over bid for the Company's shares, the Company's Board of Directors shall not exercise mandates or pass any resolutions with the intention of obstructing the take-over bid unless this is approved by the general meeting following announcement of the bid.
If an offer is made for a Company's shares, the Company's Board of Directors shall issue a statement making a recommendation as to whether shareholders shall or shall not accept the offer. The Board's statement on the offer shall make it clear whether the views expressed are unanimous, and if this is not the case it shall explain the basis on which specific members of the Board have excluded themselves from the Board's statement. The Board shall arrange a valuation from an independent expert. The valuation shall include an explanation, and shall be made public no later than at the time of the public disclosure of the Board's statement.
Any transaction that is in effect a disposal of the Company's activities shall be decided by a general meeting.
Austevoll Seafood ASA's Articles of Association contain no limitation with regard to share acquisition. The shares are freely transferable. Transparency and equal treatment of shareholders is a fundamental policy. Shall a bid be made for the Company, the Board of Directors will make a thorough evaluation of the bid.
Deviations from the Code of Practice : None
The Board of Directors shall ensure that the auditor submits the main features of the plan for the audit of the Company to the Audit committee annually.
The Board of Directors shall invite the auditor to meetings that deal with the annual accounts. At these meetings the auditor shall report on any material changes in the Company's accounting principles and key aspects of the audit, comment on any material estimated accounting figures and report all material matters on which there has been disagreement between the auditor and the executive management of the Company.
The Board of Directors shall at least once a year review the Company's internal control procedures with the auditor, including weaknesses identified by the auditor and proposals for improvement.
The Board of Directors shall establish guidelines in respect of the use of the auditor by the Company's executive management for services other than the audit.
In order to strengthen the Board's work on financial reporting and internal control, the auditor shall provide a report to the audit committee in which it declares its independence and explains the results of the statutory audit carried out by providing a range of information about the audit.
The Board of Directors has also established guidelines in respect of the use of the auditor by the management for services other than the audit.
Deviations from the Code of Practice: None


| PAGE 52 | INCOME STATEMENT |
|---|---|
| PAGE 53 | STATEMENT OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME |
| PAGE 54 | STATEMENT OF FINANCIAL POSITION |
| PAGE 55 | STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN EQUITY |
| PAGE 56 | CASH FLOW |
| PAGE 57 | NOTES TO THE ACCOUNTS |

| TABLE OF CONTENTS | PAGE |
|---|---|
| Income statement | 52 |
| Statement of comprehensive income | 53 |
| Statement of financial position | 54 |
| Statement of changes in equity | 55 |
| Cash flow | 56 |
| Notes to the accounts | |
| NOTE 1 GENERAL | 57 |
| NOTE 2 CRITICAL ACCOUNTING ESTIMATES AND JUDGEMENTS | 57 |
| NOTE 3 SEGMENT INFORMATION | 61 |
| NOTE 4 ASSOCIATED COMPANIES AND INVESTMENTS IN JOINT VENTURES | 65 |
| NOTE 5 EARNINGS AND DIVIDEND PER SHARE | 69 |
| NOTE 6 ACQUISITION OF SHARES/BUSINESS COMBINATIONS | 70 |
| NOTE 7 BIOLOGICAL ASSETS | 74 |
| NOTE 8 INVENTORIES | 79 |
| NOTE 9 TRADE AND OTHER RECEIVABLES | 79 |
| NOTE 10 INTANGIBLE ASSETS | 81 |
| NOTE 11 FIXED ASSETS | 87 |
| NOTE 12 FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS | 89 |
| NOTE 13 GUARANTEE OBLIGATIONS | 95 |
| NOTE 14 RESTRICTED BANK DEPOSITS | 95 |
| NOTE 15 EVENTS AFTER REPORTING PERIOD | 96 |
| NOTE 16 SHARE CAPITAL AND SHAREHOLDERS | 96 |
| NOTE 17 INTEREST BEARING DEBT | 98 |
| NOTE 18 CONTINGENCIES AND PROVISIONS | 102 |
| NOTE 19 FINANCIAL INCOME AND EXPENSES | 102 |
| NOTE 20 PAYROLL, FEES, NO. OF EMPLOYEES ETC. | 103 |
| NOTE 21 OTHER GAINS AND LOSSES | 105 |
| NOTE 22 OTHER CURRENT LIABILITIES | 105 |
| NOTE 23 LEASE CONTRACTS | 105 |
| NOTE 24 INVESTMENTS IN OTHER SHARES | 108 |
| NOTE 25 RELATED PARTIES | 109 |
| NOTE 26 TAX | 110 |
| NOTE 27 GROUP COMPANIES | 112 |
| NOTE 28 ALTERNATIVE PERFORMANCE TARGETS | 115 |
| NOTE 29 ACCOUNTING POLICIES | 117 |
31
| Amounts in MNOK | Note | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | 3,25 | 26,571 | 22,435 |
| Other gains and losses | 3,21 | 62 | 11 |
| Cost of goods sold | -14,109 | -13,079 | |
| Wages and salaries | 20 | -4,064 | -3,605 |
| Other operating expenses | 20,23,25 | -3,651 | -2,088 |
| Operating profit before depreciation, amortisation, | |||
| impairment and fair value adjustment of biological assets | 2,3,28 | 4,810 | 3,675 |
| Depreciation of fixed assets | 11 | -968 | -929 |
| Depreciation of right-of-use assets | 11,23 | -566 | -542 |
| Amortisation of intangible assets | 10 | -45 | -48 |
| Impairment/reversal of impairment | 10,11 | -13 | 3 |
| Operating profit before fair value adjustment of biological assets | 28 | 3,218 | 2,159 |
| Fair value adjustment of biological assets | 7 | 1,114 | -954 |
| Operating profit | 3,28 | 4,332 | 1,205 |
| Income from equity-accounted investments | 4 | 394 | 250 |
| Financial income | 19 | 394 | 290 |
| Financial expenses | 19 | -744 | -717 |
| Profit before tax | 28 | 4,376 | 1,027 |
| Tax | 2,26 | -939 | -205 |
| Profit for the year | 3,437 | 823 | |
| Attributable to non-controlling interests | 3 | 1,455 | 329 |
| Attributable to shareholders in Austevoll Seafood ASA | 5 | 1,982 | 494 |
| Average no. of outstanding shares | 5 | 201,824,074 | 201,824,074 |
| Earnings per share/diluted earnings per share (NOK) | 5 | 9.82 | 2.45 |
| Proposed dividend per share (NOK) | 5 | 4.50 | 3.50 |
| Amounts in MNOK | Note | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Profit for the year | 3,437 | 823 | |
| Items of OCI that may be reclassified to profit or loss | |||
| Change in value of financial instruments (cash flow hedges) | 12 | 63 | -34 |
| Currency translation differences | -76 | -139 | |
| Share of other comprehensive income of associates | -1 | -5 | |
| Recycling of previous currency translation differences | 0 | 0 | |
| Tax effect on items of OCI that may be reclassified to profit or loss | -2 | 4 | |
| Items of OCI that will not be reclassified to profit and loss | |||
| Actuarial deviation on pension liabilities | 20 | 0 | 0 |
| Share of other comprehensive income of associates | 0 | 0 | |
| Tax effect on items of OCI that will not be reclassified to profit and loss | 0 | 0 | |
| Total other comprehensive income after tax | -16 | -174 | |
| Total comprehensive income for the year | 3,420 | 648 | |
| Attributable to: | |||
| Non-controlling interests | 1,450 | 312 | |
| Shareholders in Austevoll Seafood ASA | 1,970 | 336 | |
| Total comprehensive income for the year | 3,420 | 648 |
| Amounts in MNOK | Note | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Assets | |||
| Goodwill | 2,10 | 2,217 | 1,958 |
| Deferred tax asset | 26 | 69 | 58 |
| Licences | 2,10 | 9,412 | 9,460 |
| Trademarks | 10 | 50 | 50 |
| Vessels | 11 | 2,385 | 2,103 |
| Land, buildings and equipment | 11 | 6,896 | 6,275 |
| Right-of-use assets | 11,23 | 3,064 | 3,106 |
| Investments in associates and joint ventures | 3,4 | 3,002 | 2,527 |
| Investments in other companies | 12,24 | 47 | 42 |
| Other non-current receivables | 9 | 168 | 164 |
| Total non-current assets | 27,310 | 25,743 | |
| Inventories | 2,8 | 1,932 | 1,569 |
| Biological assets | 2,7 | 6,173 | 5,166 |
| Trade receivables | 2,9,12,25 | 2,321 | 2,045 |
| Other receivables | 9,12 | 717 | 754 |
| Liquid assets | 12,14,17 | 5,329 | 4,463 |
| Total current assets | 16,471 | 13,998 | |
| Total assets | 3 | 43,781 | 39,741 |
| Equity and liabilities | |||
| Share capital | 16 | 101 | 101 |
| Treasury shares | -18 | -18 | |
| Share premium | 3,714 | 3,714 | |
| Retained earnings | 9,575 | 8,312 | |
| Non-controlling interests | 11,815 | 10,882 | |
| Total equity | 25,187 | 22,991 | |
| Deferred tax | 26 | 3,512 | 3,261 |
| Pension liabilities and other liabilities | 12,17,20 | 11 | 43 |
| Borrowings | 12,17 | 6,663 | 5,651 |
| Lease liabilities to credit institutions | 12,17,23,27 | 1,025 | 1,094 |
| Lease liabilities other than to credit institutions | 17,23 | 1,382 | 1,056 |
| Other long-term liabilities | 17,25 | 30 | 26 |
| Total non-current liabilities | 12,623 | 11,130 | |
| Borrowings | 12,17, | 1,315 | 2,072 |
| Short-term lease liabilities to credit institutions | 12,17,23,27 | 265 | 271 |
| Short-term lease liabilities other than to credit institutions | 17,23 | 277 | 235 |
| Trade payables Tax payable |
12,25 26 |
1,921 686 |
1,369 405 |
| Other current liabilities | 7,12,18,22 | 1,507 | 1,267 |
| Total current liabilities | 5,971 | 5,620 | |
| Total liabilities | 3 | 18,594 | 16,750 |
| Total equity and liabilities | 43,781 | 39,741 |
Helge Singelstad Chairman
Siren M. Grønhaug Board member
Storebø, 22nd of April 2022 Board of Austevoll Seafood ASA
Helge Møgster Board member
Eirik Drønen Melingen Board member
Hege Solbakken Board member
Lill Maren Møgster Board member
Hege Charlotte Bakken Deputy Chairman
Arne Møgster CEO & President
| Accumulated | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| currency | Non | ||||||||
| Amounts in MNOK | Note | Share capital |
Treasury shares |
Share premium |
translation differences |
Cash flow hedges |
Retained earnings |
controlling interests |
Total equity |
| Equity at 01.01.2020 | 101 | -18 | 3,714 | 1,241 | 51 | 7,189 | 11,052 | 23,332 | |
| Profit for the year | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 494 | 329 | 823 | ||
| Other comprehensive income | 0 | 0 | 0 | -129 | -34 | 5 | -17 | -174 | |
| Total comprehensive income for the year | 0 | 0 | 0 | -129 | -34 | 500 | 312 | 648 | |
| Transactions with shareholders | |||||||||
| Dividends | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | -507 | -477 | -983 |
| Transactions with non-controlling interests |
27 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | -6 | -5 |
| Total transactions with shareholders | |||||||||
| in the period | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | -506 | -482 | -989 | |
| Total change in equity in the period | 0 | 0 | 0 | -129 | -34 | -7 | -170 | -340 | |
| Equity at 31.12.2020 | 101 | -18 | 3,714 | 1,112 | 17 | 7,183 | 10,882 | 22,991 | |
| Profit for the year | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1,982 | 1,455 | 3,437 | |
| Other comprehensive income | 0 | 0 | 0 | -79 | 63 | 5 | -5 | -16 | |
| Total comprehensive income for the year | 0 | 0 | 0 | -79 | 63 | 1,987 | 1,450 | 3,420 | |
| Transactions with shareholders | |||||||||
| Dividends | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | -706 | -628 | -1,335 |
| Transactions with non-controlling | |||||||||
| interests | 27 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 111 | 111 |
| Total transactions with shareholders | |||||||||
| in the period | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | -706 | -517 | -1,223 | |
| Total change in equity in the period | 0 | 0 | 0 | -79 | 63 | 1,279 | 933 | 2,196 | |
| Equity at 31.12.2021 | 101 | -18 | 3,714 | 1,033 | 80 | 8,462 | 11,815 | 25,187 |
| Amounts in MNOK | Note | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Profit before tax | 4,376 | 1,027 | |
| Taxes paid | -447 | -491 | |
| Depreciation and amortisation | 10,11 | 1,580 | 1,519 |
| Impairment/reversal of impairment | 10,11 | 13 | -3 |
| Gain/loss on sale of land, buildings and equipment | 21 | -62 | -7 |
| Unrealised foreign exchange gains/losses | -45 | 58 | |
| Share of profit from associates | 4 | -394 | -250 |
| Interest expense | 19 | 322 | 341 |
| Interest income | 19 | -39 | -46 |
| Fair value adjustment of biological assets | 7 | -1,114 | 954 |
| Change in inventories | -87 | -400 | |
| Change in trade receivables and other receivables | 9 | -15 | 630 |
| Change in trade payables | 443 | -335 | |
| Change in net pension liabilities | 2 | 1 | |
| Change in other accruals | 95 | 15 | |
| Exchange differences | 6 | -70 | |
| Net cash flow from operating activities | 4,635 | 2,944 | |
| Proceeds from sale of fixed assets | 43 | 17 | |
| Purchase of intangible assets and fixed assets | 10,11 | -1,338 | -1,529 |
| Purchase of shares and holdings in other companies | -509 | -37 | |
| Cash and cash equivalents from business combinations | 6 | 4 | 0 |
| Dividends received | 4 | 114 | 130 |
| Interest received | 39 | 46 | |
| Change in other non-current receivables | -4 | -28 | |
| Exchange differences on invested capital | 0 | -2 | |
| Net cash flow from investing activities | -1,650 | -1,403 | |
| Proceeds from new long-term interest-bearing debt | 17 | 2,394 | 2,111 |
| Repayment of long-term interest-bearing debt | 17 | -2,467 | -2,225 |
| Change in short-term interest-bearing debt | 17 | -410 | 144 |
| Interest paid | -326 | -345 | |
| Dividends paid | 5 | -706 | -507 |
| Transactions with non-controlling interests | -634 | -477 | |
| Exchange differences on financing activities Net cash flow from financing activities |
21 -2,128 |
-29 -1,326 |
|
| Change in cash and cash equivalents | 856 | 215 | |
| Liquid assets at 01.01. | 4,463 | 4,251 | |
| Exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents | 9 | -3 | |
| Liquid assets at 31.12. | 5,329 | 4,463 | |
| Consists of | |||
| Bank deposits etc. | 5,329 | 4,463 | |
| Of which restricted cash deposits | 14 | 188 | 178 |
| Unutilised overdraft facility | 17 | 3,681 | 3,268 |
| Unutilised long term credit facility | 17 | 1,875 | 1,566 |
Austevoll Seafood ASA is a public limited company registered in Norway. The Company's main office is located on Storebø in the municipality of Austevoll, Norway. Laco AS is the company's major shareholder and ultimate parent (see note 16).
The Company is listed on the Oslo Stock Exchange.
The annual, statutory accounts, based upon International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) as adopted by EU, were approved by the Board of Directors at April 22nd, 2022.
In the following "Group" is used to describe information related to Austevoll Seafood ASA Group whilst "Company" is used for the parent company itself.
All amounts in the notes are in NOK million (MNOK), if not specified differently
Estimates and judgements are continually evaluated and are based on historical experience and other factors, including expectations of future events that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances.
The Group makes estimates and assumptions concerning the future. The resulting accounting estimates will, by definition, seldom equal the related actual results. The estimates and assumptions that have a significant risk of causing a material adjustment to the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities within the next financial year are discussed below.
The Group tests annually whether goodwill and licences with indefinite lives have suffered any impairment, in accordance with the accounting policy stated in note 29. The recoverable amounts of cash-generating units have been determined based on valuein-use calculations unless otherwise stated. These calculations require the use of estimates and are further described in note 10.
The Group is subject to income taxes in numerous jurisdictions. Significant judgment is required in determining the worldwide provision for income taxes. There are many transactions and calculations for which the ultimate tax determination is uncertain during the ordinary course of business. The Group recognises liabilities for anticipated tax audit issues based on estimates of whether additional taxes will be due. Where the final tax outcome of these matters is different from the amounts that were initially recorded, such differences will impact the income tax and deferred tax provisions in the period in which such determination is made. The utilisation of recognised tax assets will depend on future positive tax earnings in various jurisdictions, and may not be offset between various tax regimes. Valuation of impairment requirement for tax assets is therefore based on estimates of future tax earnings in some of the tax regimes.
Finished goods of fish are measured at the lowest of cost and net realisable value. Material fluctuations in sales prices do occur for such inventory, and might rapidly outdate the assessments made by the Group at a given date.
Biological assets comprise the stock of roe, fry, juvenile fish, cleaner fish and fish in sea. Biological assets are measured at fair value less costs to sell. For a more detailed description of the accounting policies applied, please refer to the description provided under accounting policies and in the note on biological assets.
Valuation is based on a number of different premises, many of which are non-observable. The premises can be categorised in four different groups: (1) Price, (2) Cost, (3) Volume and (4) Discount rate.
For fish ready for harvest on the balance sheet date, uncertainty mainly involves realised prices and volume. For fish not ready for harvest, the level of uncertainty is higher. In addition to uncertainty
related to price and volume, there will also be uncertainty related to remaining production costs, remaining biological transformation and remaining mortality up to harvesting date for this fish.
One important premise in the valuation of fish both ready for harvest and not yet ready for harvest is the projected market price. This is also the premise that historically shows the highest fluctuations. In order to estimate the projected price, the forward prices for superior Norwegian salmon weighing 3-6 kg gutted weight from Fish Pool are applied. In the Group's opinion, the use of observable prices makes price estimates more reliable and comparable. For fish ready for harvest the forward price for the following month is applied. For fish not ready for harvest, the forward price for the month when the fish is expected to achieve optimal weight for harvest is applied. If it is probable on the balance sheet date that the fish will be harvested before it reaches optimal harvest weight, for example due to biological challenges (that have emerged prior to the balance sheet date), an extra price adjustment is required. Such a price adjustment takes into account the fact that the market price per kilo for small fish is lower than for normal-size fish. The price is subsequently adjusted for exporter margins and clearing costs. This applies to fish both ready for harvest and not ready for harvest. Further adjustments are necessary for harvesting costs (well boat, harvesting and packaging services), transport costs to Oslo and quality differences. Adjustments are also made for price differences between salmon and trout, and any other price premium such as for ASC-certified fish. The adjustments for exporter margin and clearing costs are observable items estimated by Fish Pool. The adjustment for harvesting costs, transport costs and quality differences is based on the Group's historical costs per region and historical quality distribution, while the other adjustments are based on an assessment using historical data and the Group's view of future market developments.
For fish not ready for harvest, an adjustment is also required for the costs necessary to grow the fish to optimal harvest weight. Estimates related to future costs are based on the Group's prognoses per locality. There is some uncertainty regarding both future feed prices, other costs and biological development (growth, feed factor and mortality). If the estimated costs are higher than expected by a normal enterprise on the market, for example due to long-term agreements previously signed with subcontractors resulting in costs that deviate substantially from the market price, the cost estimates shall be adjusted to reflect the costs expected by a rational enterprise on the market.
Projected harvest volume is calculated on the basis of the estimated number of fish (individuals) on the balance sheet date minus estimated future mortality, multiplied by the estimated harvest weight (4.65 kg live weight for salmon and 4.76 kg live weight for trout). There is some uncertainty involving both the number of fish in the sea on the balance sheet date, remaining mortality and estimated harvest weight. The actual harvest volume may therefore differ from the estimated harvest volume either as a result of changes in biological developments or due to special events, such as abnormal mortality. The estimate for number of fish on the balance sheet date is based on the number of smolt released to sea. The number of smolt is adjusted to take into account uncertainties during counting and actual registered mortality related to release. The normal estimated harvest weight (optimal harvest weight) is assessed to be the live weight of fish that results in a gutted weight of 4 kg, unless specific conditions exist on the balance sheet date to indicate that the fish have to be harvested before they reach this weight. If this is the case, the estimated harvest weight is adjusted. Projected mortality during the period from the balance sheet date to the date when the fish reach harvest weight is estimated to be 0.5% to 1.25% of the number of incoming fish per month, depending on region.
Every time a fish is harvested and sold, this generates a positive cash flow. In order to simplify matters, all the remaining expenses are allocated to the same period as the income, so there is only one cash flow per locality. The cash flow is allocated to the month when harvest is estimated to take place. The sum of the cash flows from all the localities where the Group has fish in the sea will then be distributed over the entire period of time it takes to farm the fish in the sea on the balance sheet date. With the current size of the smolt released and the frequency of the smolt releases, this period of time may be up to 18 months. The estimated future cash flow is discounted monthly. The level of discount rate applied has a major impact on the estimate of fair value. The discount rate shall take into account a number of factors. The discount factor comprises three main elements: (1) Risk adjustment, (2) Licence lease and (3) Time value.
The risk adjustment shall reflect the price discount a hypothetical buyer would demand as compensation for the risk assumed by investing in live fish rather than a different investment. The longer it takes to reach harvest date, the higher the risk that something may occur to affect cash flow. Three significant factors could have an impact on cash flow. Volume could change, costs could change and prices could change. The one thing all three factors have in common is that the sample space is unsymmetrical.
Salmon and trout farming is not a market with free competition and no barriers to entry. Due to limited access to licences for farming fish for consumers, such licences currently have a very high value. For a hypothetical buyer of live fish to take over and continue to farm the fish, he/she would need a licence, locality and other permits required for such production. At the time of writing, leasing of licences is not permitted. However, on a hypothetical market for the purchase and sale of live fish, it has to be assumed that this would be possible. In such a scenario, a hypothetical buyer would claim a significant discount in order to allocate a sufficient share of the returns to the buyer's own licences or to cover the lease costs for leased licences. It is difficult to create a model that would allow a hypothetical annual lease cost to be derived from prices for sold licences, as the curve in the model would be based on projections of future profit performance in the industry. Moreover, it is a complex process to derive a lease price per shorter unit of time and, in the last instance, per volume, when the licence limitations are measured at different levels (location, region and company).
Finally, a discount must be made for the time value of the tied-up capital linked to the share of the present value of the cash flow allocated to the biomass. It has to be assumed that a hypothetical buyer would claim compensation for the alternative cost of investing funds in live fish rather than some other type of investment. The production cycle for salmon in the sea currently takes up to 18 months. The cash flow will therefore extend over a similar period. Assuming a constant sales price throughout the period, the cash flow would decrease for each month, as costs are incurred to farm the fish to harvest weight. The costs increase for every month the fish are in the sea. As such, the effect of deferred cash flow is lower than would be the case if the cash flow had been constant. This component is however deemed important due to the major values the stock of fish represents.
Principally, a monthly discount rate of 4% per month was applied in 2021. The rate applied in 2020 was 5%. Only one smaller company in the Group applied the discount rate of 5% in both 2020 and 2021. In the sensitivity analysis below, it is demonstrated how a change in discount rate would impact the value on fish in sea. The change is a result from a periodic review.
As mentioned above, the hypothetical license lease is one of the main elements when setting the discount rate. In the hypothetical license lease price the future expected margin is an important parameter. The margin is calculated as the difference between price and cost in future periods. Thus, the forward price on salmon together with expectations regarding future cost level have a significant impact on the future expected margin. The higher the expectations to the future margins are, the higher a hypothetical license lease price will be. This is explained with the fact that higher margins will increase the fair value on the licenses. If the expectations to the margins drops, this will over time lead to lower hypothetical lease rent, and fair value on the licenses.
How the change in the expectations regarding future margins occurs, has also significance. It is assumed that an unexpected lower (higher) price at date for measurement will not lead to a simultaneously reduction (increase) in hypothetical license lease price for fish in sea, but instead a step by step reduction (increase) in future lease price for new smolt releases. This is explained with the fact that it must be assumed that the lease price for the fish in sea is already negotiated for the period until harvest. When it comes to the production costs it is assumed that changes in expected future cost level will not impact the value of the biological assets directly, but indirectly as a consequence of the fact that the future hypothetical license lease price will be based on expectations on future margins.
In practice this means that changes in forward prices will impact the fair value on fish in sea directly through a change in the numerator in the cash flow, while changes in cost will not impact the fair value on fish in sea directly, since costs are not included in the numerator of the cash flow. But an assumed permanent shift in costs due to the newly implemented production fee and the cost inflation on the back of the pandemic, will negatively impact the expectations regarding future margin and the hypothetic license lease price. Thus, the cash flow is indirectly impacted through the discount rate in the denominator. This is the reason why the applied discount rate has been reduced from 5% to 4%.
The Group considers that four components are key for valuation. These are:
The tables below show a simulated sensitivity to changes in fair value of the biological assets in the event of changes in these parameters:
| Projected harvest weight per fish in kg gwe | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3.5 | 3.8 | 4.0 | 4.3 | 4.5 | |||||||
| Change in projected harvest weight per kg gwe | |||||||||||
| (0.50) | (0.25) | - | 0.25 | 0.50 | |||||||
| 51.1 | -5.00 | 4,230 | 4,604 | 5,002 | 5,410 | 5,846 | |||||
| 54.1 | -2.00 | 4,633 | 5,033 | 5,457 | 5,913 | 6,341 | |||||
| 55.1 | -1.00 | 4,768 | 5,177 | 5,609 | 6,070 | 6,507 | |||||
| 56.1 | - | 4,903 | 5,321 | 5,787 | 6,228 | 6,672 | |||||
| 57.1 | 1.00 | 5,040 | 5,466 | 5,937 | 6,386 | 6,838 | |||||
| Average price per kg | 58.1 | Change in price per kg | 2.00 | 5,177 | 5,610 | 6,087 | 6,543 | 7,004 | |||
| (NOK) | 61.1 | (NOK) | 5.00 | 5,587 | 6,064 | 6,536 | 7,016 | 7,500 |
The table shows changes in estimated fair value (present value) before provision for loss-making contracts for the parameters price per kg and projected harvest weight per kg gutted weight. For projected harvest weight, the table shows changes in fair value when there is an increase in projected harvest weight of 250 and 500 grams respectively, and for a corresponding reduction. The projected total cost is held constant, such that an increase in projected harvest weight will bring about a reduction in cost per kg, while a reduction in projected harvest weight will bring about an increase in cost per kg. For price, the change is per NOK gutted weight. The above price is after deduction for harvesting costs, transport to Oslo, quality, size and exporter margin.
| Monthly discount rate (%) | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2.0% | 3.0% | 4.0% | 5.0% | 6.0% | |||||||
| Change in monthly discount rate (%) | |||||||||||
| -2.0% | -1.0% | 0.0% | 1.0% | 2.0% | |||||||
| 51.1 | -5.00 | 5,645 | 5,308 | 5,002 | 4,724 | 4,470 | |||||
| Average price per kg | 54.1 | Change in price per kg | -2.00 | 6,171 | 5,797 | 5,457 | 5,148 | 4,867 | |||
| 55.1 | -1.00 | 6,347 | 5,960 | 5,609 | 5,290 | 5,000 | |||||
| 56.1 | - | 6,549 | 6,149 | 5,787 | 5,458 | 5,158 | |||||
| 57.1 | 1.00 | 6,723 | 6,310 | 5,937 | 5,598 | 5,289 | |||||
| 58.1 | 2.00 | 6,896 | 6,472 | 6,087 | 5,737 | 5,419 | |||||
| (NOK) | 61.1 | (NOK) | 5.00 | 7,417 | 6,955 | 6,536 | 6,156 | 5,810 |
The table shows changes in estimated fair value (present value) before provision for loss-making contracts for the parameters price per kg and monthly discount rate. For the monthly discount rate, the table simulates an absolute change of +/- 1% and +/- 2% (100 and 200 points) respectively.
| Number of fish in stock (million fish) | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 52.5 | 54.1 | 55.2 | 56.3 | 58.0 | ||||||||
| Change in number of fish in stock | ||||||||||||
| -5% | -2% | 0% | 2% | 5% | ||||||||
| 51.1 | Change in price per kg | -5.00 | 4,624 | 4,851 | 5,002 | 5,154 | 5,380 | |||||
| Average price per kg | 54.1 | -2.00 | 5,056 | 5,297 | 5,457 | 5,618 | 5,858 | |||||
| 55.1 | -1.00 | 5,201 | 5,446 | 5,609 | 5,773 | 6,018 | ||||||
| 56.1 | - | 5,371 | 5,621 | 5,787 | 5,953 | 6,203 | ||||||
| 57.1 | 1.00 | 5,513 | 5,767 | 5,937 | 6,106 | 6,360 | ||||||
| 58.1 | 2.00 | 5,656 | 5,914 | 6,087 | 6,259 | 6,518 | ||||||
| (NOK) | 61.1 | (NOK) | 5.00 | 6,083 | 6,355 | 6,536 | 6,718 | 6,990 |
The table shows changes in estimated fair value (present value) before provision for loss-making contracts for the parameters price per kg and estimated number of fish in stock on the balance sheet date. For the number of fish in stock, the table simulates a change of +/- 2% and +/- 5% in the number of fish per locality for all localities with fish in stock.
The Board of Directors is the Group's chief operating decisionmaker. Management has determined the operating segment based on the information reviewed by the Board of Directors. The Board of Directors considers the business from a company perspective. Several of the larger companies controlled by AUSS are separately listed companies, and as such naturally reviewed on a consolidated basis.
Lerøy Seafood Group ASA (LSG) is a Norwegian public company listed on the Oslo Stock Exchange. LSG group is involved in fish farming (salmon and trout), fishery of whitefish and VAP of salmon, trout and whitefish, and sale and distribution of different fish species and processed fish products.
Austral Group S.A.A. (Austral) is a Peruvian public company listed on the Peru Stock Exchange. Austral is engaged in the production of fishmeal, fish oil, canned fish and frozen fish. From its fishing vessels to the finished products produced in the four fishmeal/oil factories in Coishco, Chancay, Pisco and Ilo respectively, Austral is a truly integrated system.
FoodCorp Chile S.A. (FC) is a Chilean private company within the pelagic sector. The company is located in Coronel and is a truly integrated system engaged in production of frozen fish, canned fish, fishmeal and fish oil. The company holds a fleet of three modern purse-seiner vessels.
Br. Birkeland AS (BRBI) holds pelagic fishing licences utilised by two modern purse-seiner fishing vessels, in addition the company owns two vessels with permit to fish snow crab.
Br. Birkeland Farming AS (BFARM) holds seven salmon farming licences in the Western Region of Norway.
Pelagia Holding AS (Pelagia) is a private company within the pelagic sector. Pelagia is engaged in production of fishmeal, fish oil, Omega-3 oil and frozen fish for direct human consumption. Pelagia has its production facilities in Norway, UK and Ireland. The company purchased the remaining 50% of the shares in Hordafor AS on 1st of July 2021. Once this transaction was completed, Pelagia owned 100% of the shares in Hordafor AS (HF), and HF has made the move from an associated company to a subsidiary, and is wholly consolidated in the Pelagia Group as of 1st of July 2021. HF is a major producer of protein concentrate and oil based on cuttings from the salmon industry, whitefish industry and pelagic cuttings. Pelagia is jointly owned with Kvefi AS, and is accounted for as a joint venture.
Austevoll Seafood ASA (parent company), Austevoll Eiendom AS, Austevoll Laksepakkeri AS, AUSS Laks AS and AUSS Shared Service AS are not included in any of the operating segments. Unrealised gains on sales between the operating segments, which are eliminated in the consolidated financial statements, are also presented as other/elimination.
| Austral | FoodCorp | Br. Birkeland | Pelagia | Other/ | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | LSG | Group | Chile Br. Birkeland | Farming | Holding 50% | elim. | Group | |
| Other operating income | 23,054 | 2,018 | 716 | 304 | 432 | 5,001 | -4,953 | 26,571 |
| Inter-segment sales | 20 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | -22 | 0 |
| Other gains and losses | 63 | -1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 62 |
| Total segment income | 23,136 | 2,017 | 716 | 306 | 432 | 5,001 | -4,974 | 26,634 |
| Operating expenses | -19,359 | -1,344 | -524 | -196 | -380 | -4,492 | 4,470 | -21,823 |
| Operating profit before depreciation, | ||||||||
| amortisation, impairment and fair value | ||||||||
| adjustment of biological assets | 3,778 | 673 | 192 | 111 | 52 | 509 | -504 | 4,810 |
| Depreciation and amortisation | -1,252 | -167 | -35 | -41 | -65 | -145 | 126 | -1,579 |
| Impairment/reversal of impairment * | -6 | 1 | -7 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | -13 |
| Operating profit before fair value | ||||||||
| adjustment of biological assets | 2,519 | 506 | 150 | 70 | -12 | 363 | -378 | 3,217 |
| Fair value adjustment of biological assets | 1,085 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 29 | 0 | 0 | 1,114 |
| Operating profit | 3,604 | 506 | 150 | 70 | 17 | 363 | -378 | 4,332 |
| 2021 | LSG | Austral Group |
FoodCorp | Chile Br. Birkeland | Br. Birkeland Farming |
Pelagia Holding 50% |
Other/ elim. |
Group |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Income from associates | 122 | 0 | 0 | -2 | 0 | 11 | 263 | 394 |
| Financial income | 73 | 318 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 2 | -1 | 394 |
| Financial expenses | -267 | -418 | -5 | -5 | -6 | -51 | 7 | -744 |
| Profit before tax | 3,532 | 407 | 147 | 64 | 12 | 325 | -109 | 4,376 |
| Tax | -751 | -128 | -40 | -14 | -2 | -42 | 37 | -939 |
| Profit for the year | 2,781 | 279 | 107 | 50 | 9 | 282 | -71 | 3,437 |
| Attributable to non-controlling interests | 1,394 | 28 | 0 | 29 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 1,455 |
| Attributable to shareholders in Austevoll Seafood ASA |
1,387 | 251 | 107 | 22 | 5 | 282 | -71 | 1,982 |
| Share of dividend recognised in the parent | ||||||||
| company, Austevoll Seafood ASA | 785 | 0 | 11 | 33 | 0 | 100 | 0 | 929 |
| Austral | FoodCorp | Br. Birkeland | Pelagia | Other/ | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 | LSG | Group | Chile Br. Birkeland | Farming | Holding 50% | elim. | Group | |
| Other operating income | 19,958 | 1,241 | 638 | 246 | 301 | 4,407 | -4,356 | 22,435 |
| Inter-segment sales | 2 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | -5 | 0 |
| Other gains and losses | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 0 | -1 | 11 |
| Total segment income | 19,966 | 1,241 | 638 | 249 | 306 | 4,407 | -4,361 | 22,447 |
| Operating expenses | -16,857 | -904 | -500 | -146 | -337 | -4,080 | 4,052 | -18,772 |
| Operating profit before depreciation, amortisation, impairment and fair value |
||||||||
| adjustment of biological assets | 3,109 | 338 | 138 | 103 | -30 | 327 | -309 | 3,675 |
| Depreciation and amortisation | -1,158 | -205 | -40 | -43 | -50 | -123 | 100 | -1,519 |
| Impairment/reversal of impairment * | -2 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Operating profit before fair value | ||||||||
| adjustment of biological assets | 1,950 | 133 | 101 | 59 | -80 | 204 | -209 | 2,159 |
| Fair value adjustment of biological assets | -827 | 0 | 0 | 0 | -127 | 0 | 0 | -954 |
| Operating profit | 1,123 | 133 | 101 | 59 | -207 | 204 | -209 | 1,205 |
| 2020 | LSG | Austral Group |
FoodCorp | Chile Br. Birkeland | Br. Birkeland Farming |
Pelagia Holding 50% |
Other/ elim. |
Group |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Income from associates | 105 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 9 | 14 | 113 | 250 |
| Financial income | 33 | 237 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 11 | 290 |
| Financial expenses | -274 | -386 | -7 | -7 | -6 | -64 | 27 | -716 |
| Profit before tax | 987 | -16 | 97 | 62 | -203 | 157 | -58 | 1.027 |
| Tax | -197 | -11 | -24 | -11 | 47 | -30 | 22 | -204 |
| Profit for the year | 790 | -27 | 73 | 51 | -156 | 127 | -36 | 823 |
| Attributable to non-controlling interests | 370 | 0 | 0 | 29 | -70 | 0 | 0 | 329 |
| Attributable to shareholders in Austevoll Seafood ASA |
420 | -26 | 73 | 22 | -86 | 127 | -36 | 494 |
| Share of dividend recognised in the parent company, Austevoll Seafood ASA |
628 | 0 | 0 | 17 | 0 | 100 | 0 | 745 |
* For further information on impairment, see notes 10 and 11
| Non-current assets | Total investments in non-current assets |
||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Segment | 2021 | 2020 | 2021 | 2020 | |
| Lerøy Seafood Group ASA | 18,041 | 16,756 | 1,019 | 1,377 | |
| Pelagia Holding AS | IA | IA | IA | IA | |
| Br. Birkeland AS | 1,025 | 888 | 176 | 6 | |
| Br. Birkeland Farming AS | 543 | 525 | 5 | 37 | |
| Other | 4,954 | 4,729 | 4 | 12 | |
| Total for Norway | 24,562 | 22,899 | 1,203 | 1,433 | |
| Austral Group S.A.A. - Peru | 2,080 | 2,200 | 132 | 92 | |
| FoodCorp Chile S.A. - Chile | 599 | 586 | 3 | 4 | |
| Total | 27,241 | 25,685 | 1,338 | 1,529 |
| Associates and joint venture | Total liabilities | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Segment | 2021 | 2020 | 2021 | 2020 |
| Lerøy Seafood Group ASA | 1,379 | 1,086 | 15,179 | 12,856 |
| Pelagia Holding AS | 1,473 | 1,289 | IA | IA |
| Br. Birkeland AS | 45 | 46 | 391 | 405 |
| Br. Birkeland Farming AS | 98 | 99 | 663 | 578 |
| Other | 7 | 6 | 661 | 1,277 |
| Total for Norway | 3,002 | 2,526 | 16,893 | 15,117 |
| Austral Group S.A.A. - Peru | 1 | 1 | 1,476 | 1,440 |
| FoodCorp Chile S.A. - Chile | 0 | 0 | 223 | 194 |
| Total | 3,002 | 2,527 | 18,593 | 16,750 |
| Revenue by geographic area | 2021 | % | 2020 | % |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Norway | 4,874 | 18% | 4,634 | 21% |
| EU | 12,697 | 48% | 10,888 | 49% |
| UK | 524 | 2% | I/A | N/A |
| Eastern Europe | 997 | 4% | 952 | 4% |
| Africa | 462 | 2% | 355 | 2% |
| North America | 1,199 | 5% | 894 | 4% |
| Asia | 3,487 | 13% | 4,232 | 19% |
| South America | 509 | 2% | 482 | 2% |
| Others | 1,820 | 7% | 0 | 0% |
| Total | 26,570 | 100% | 22,436 | 100% |
Revenue is allocated based on the customer's country/destination for shipment of sold goods
| Amounts in MNOK | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|
| Associates | 1,529 | 1,238 |
| Joint venture | 1,473 | 1,289 |
| At 31.12. | 3,002 | 2,527 |
Profit and loss recognised in the income statement
| Amounts in MNOK | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|
| Associates | 121 | 123 |
| Joint venture | 272 | 127 |
| At 31.12. | 393 | 250 |
Set out below are the major associates of the Group as of 31.12.2021. The shareholding in Seafood Denmark A/S increased from 33.33% to 77.59% in 2021, and is now reported as a subsidiary.
| Company Country of incorporation |
Voting rights | Measurement method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | ||||
| Norskott Havbruk AS | Norway | 50.00% | Equity method | |
| Seistar Holding AS | Norway | 50.00% | Equity method | |
| Seafood Danmark A/S | Denmark | 77.59% | Consolidated | |
| 2020 | ||||
| Norskott Havbruk AS | Norway | 50.00% | Equity method | |
| Seistar Holding AS | Norway | 50.00% | Equity method | |
| Seafood Danmark A/S | Denmark | 33.33% | Equity method |
Set out below are the summarised financial information for the investments in associates considered material to the Group, and total amounts for associates considered to not be material.
| Company | Seafood Danmark A/S Group ** | Norskott Havbruk AS Group * | Seistar Holding AS Group | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Year-end | 2021 | 2020 | 2021 | 2020 | 2021 | 2020 |
| Income statement | ||||||
| Revenue | 1,810 | 1,685 | 2,307 | 1,699 | 232 | 201 |
| Profit before tax | 94 | 98 | 242 | 143 | 39,617 | 43 |
| Of which fair value adjustment | ||||||
| of biological assets | 0 | 0 | 6 | -143 | 0 | 0 |
| Profit after tax | 70 | 87 | 187 | 98 | 37 | 42 |
| Other comprehensive income | 3 | 0 | 27 | -7 | 0 | 0 |
| Statement of financial position | ||||||
| Total current assets | 370 | 414 | 2,127 | 1,284 | 88 | 69 |
| Total current liabilities | -263 | -298 | -798 | -681 | -40 | -34 |
| Total non-current assets | 378 | 398 | 3,276 | 1,665 | 741 | 759 |
| Total non-current liabilities | -60 | -89 | -2,415 | -902 | -399 | -433 |
| Net assets | 425 | 425 | 2,190 | 1,365 | 390 | 361 |
| Carrying amount in AUSS | 0 | 139 | 1,126 | 714 | 219 | 198 |
The information above reflects the figures presented in the financial statements for the associates (not Austevoll Seafood ASA's share), adjusted for differences in accounting policies between the Group and the associates.
Reconciliation of summarised financial information:
| Company | Seafood Danmark A/S Group ** | Norskott Havbruk AS Group * | Seistar Holding AS Group | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Year-end | 2021 | 2020 | 2021 | 2020 | 2021 | 2020 |
| At 01.01. | 139 | 124 | 714 | 668 | 198 | 157 |
| Additions | 0 | 0 | 306 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Disposals | -125 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Share of profit/(loss) | 6 | 32 | 94 | 49 | 21 | 19 |
| Exchange differences | -7 | 9 | 13 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Dividends | -14 | -24 | 0 | 0 | 0 | -3 |
| Other changes in equity | 0 | -1 | 0 | -4 | 0 | 25 |
| Carrying amount at 31.12. | 0 | 139 | 1.126 | 714 | 219 | 198 |
* Norskott Havbruk Group operate their business through their subsidiary in Scotland. Exchange differences refer to translation of currency from GBP to NOK.
** Subsidiary from 2021. The profit/loss figures for 2021 are for the whole year. The statement of financial position shows the status at 31st of December 2021.
| Others | Total | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Year-end | 2021 | 2020 | 2021 | 2020 |
| At 01.01. | 216 | 187 | 1,238 | 1,106 |
| Additions | 0 | 61 | 306 | 61 |
| Disposals | 0 | 0 | -125 | 0 |
| Share of profit/(loss) | 1 | 23 | 121 | 123 |
| Exchange differences | 0 | 0 | 7 | 9 |
| Dividends | 0 | -3 | -14 | -30 |
| Other changes in equity | -3 | -52 | -3 | -32 |
| Carrying amount at 31.12. | 213 | 216 | 1,529 | 1,238 |
A capital increase amounting to NOK 611 million in Norskott Havbruk AS was completed in December 2021. At the same time Norskott Havbruk AS increased the capital in the fully owned subsidiary Scottish Seafarms Ltd (SSF) with GBP 50 million. The new capital in Scottish Seafarms Ltd was used as a part of the financing of the acquisition of Grieg Seafood Hjaltland, where Scottish Seafarms Ltd was the buyer. Total consideration paid for Grieg Seafood Hjaltland was GBP 172.6 million. After the acquisition the acquired company changed name to SSF Hjaltland. The acquired company is performing the same type of business as Scottish Seafarms Ltd, with production of smolt and salmon mainly on Shetland.
| Investments in joint venture | Country of incorporation | Business | Voting rights | Measurement method |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pelagia Holding AS | Norway | Norway | 50% | Equity method |
The table below shows 100% share of assets and liabilities, income and profit/loss in Pelagia Holding AS (joint venture) recognised under the equity method.
| Pelagia Holding AS Group | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Assets | 2021 | 2020 | |
| Non-current assets | 4,213 | 3,387 | |
| Cash and cash equivalents | 216 | 176 | |
| Other current assets | 3,078 | 3,363 | |
| Total assets | 7,506 | 6,927 | |
| Non-current liabilities | 2,633 | 3,298 | |
| Current liabilities | 1,779 | 924 | |
| Total liabilities | 4.412 | 4,222 | |
| Total equity | 3,094 | 2,705 | |
| Total equity and liabilities | 7,506 | 6,927 | |
| Revenue | 10,002 | 8,814 | |
| Depreciation, amortisation and impairment | -291 | -246 | |
| Operating expenses | -8,984 | -8,159 | |
| Net interest expense | -85 | -60 | |
| Other financial items | 8 | -34 | |
| Profit before tax | 649 | 314 | |
| Tax | -85 | -59 | |
| Profit after tax | 565 | 255 | |
| Other comprehensive income | 0 | 0 | |
| Total comprehensive income | 565 | 255 |
| Pelagia Holding AS Group | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reconciliation of summarised financial information, 50% share | 2021 | 2020 | ||
| At 01.01. | 1,289 | 1,249 | ||
| Additions | 0 | 0 | ||
| Disposals | 0 | 0 | ||
| Share of profit/(loss) | 272 | 127 | ||
| Other income from total comprehensive income | 0 | 0 | ||
| Exchange differences | 12 | 13 | ||
| Dividends | -100 | -100 | ||
| Other changes in equity | 0 | 0 | ||
| Carrying amount at 31.12. | 1,473 | 1,289 |
Distributed dividend per share in 2021, based on profit figure for 2020 was NOK 3.50 per share. This amounted to a total of TNOK 709,511. Based on the profit figure for 2021, a dividend payment of NOK 4.50 per share is proposed for 2022. This will in total constitute TNOK 912,228. A final decision will be made by the ordinary shareholders' meeting on 24th of May 2022.
| Year | Share of profit after tax to shareholders in AUSS |
No. of shares at 31.12. |
Average no. of outstanding shares |
Earnings per share |
Proposed dividend |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 1,982 | 202,717,374 | 201,824,074 | 9.82 | 912 |
| 2020 | 494 | 202,717,374 | 201,824,074 | 2.45 | 710 |
| 2019 | 1,256 | 202,717,374 | 201,824,407 | 6.22 | 507 |
| 2018 | 2,299 | 202,717,374 | 201,824,407 | 11.39 | 710 |
| 2017 | 1,009 | 202,717,374 | 201,824,074 | 5.00 | 568 |
| 2016 | 1,645 | 202,717,374 | 201,409,613 | 8.17 | 507 |
| 2015 | 722 | 202,717,374 | 200,995,151 | 3.59 | 1,419 |
| 2014 | 555 | 202,717,374 | 200,995,151 | 2.76 | 405 |
| 2013 | 699 | 202,717,374 | 200,995,151 | 3.48 | 324 |
| 2012 | 419 | 202,717,374 | 202,717,374 | 2.07 | 243 |
| 2011 | 369 | 202,717,374 | 202,717,374 | 1.82 | 203 |
| 2010 | 1,222 | 202,717,374 | 202,717,374 | 6.03 | 304 |
| 2009 | 723 | 202,717,374 | 188,917,000 | 3.83 | 243 |
| 2008 | 122 | 184,317,374 | 184,317,374 | 0.66 | 0 |
| 2007 | 499 | 184,317,374 | 183,302,000 | 2.72 | 55 |
| 2006 | 264 | 178,223,624 | 145,550,000 | 1.82 | 0 |
| Total | 14,280 | 7,110 |
| Proposed dividend | Proposed dividend as % of profit for the year excl. fair value |
Dividend paid in NOK million |
No. of shares | Dividend paid | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Year | per share | adjustment of biological assets | (from last year) | eligible for dividend | per share |
| 2021 | 4.50 | 36% | 710 | 202,717,374 | 3.50 |
| 2020 | 3.50 | 45% | 507 | 202,717,374 | 2.50 |
| 2019 | 2.50 | 21% | 708 | 202,717,374 | 3.50 |
| 2018 | 3.50 | 20% | 566 | 202,717,374 | 2.80 |
| 2017 | 2.80 | 18% | 505 | 202,717,374 | 2.50 |
| 2016 | 2.50 | 20% | 1,419 | 202,717,374 | 7.00 |
| 2015 | 7.00 | 129% | 405 | 202,717,374 | 2.00 |
| 2014 | 2.00 | 32% | 324 | 202,717,374 | 1.60 |
| 2013 | 1.60 | 32% | 243 | 202,717,374 | 1.20 |
| 2012 | 1.20 | 59% | 203 | 202,717,374 | 1.00 |
| 2011 | 1.00 | 21% | 304 | 202,717,374 | 1.50 |
| 2010 | 1.50 | 20% | 243 | 202,717,374 | 1.20 |
| 2009 | 1.20 | 26% | 0 | 202,717,374 | 0.00 |
| 2008 | 0.00 | 0% | 55 | 184,317,374 | 0.30 |
| 2007 | 0.30 | 12% | 0 | 184,317,374 | 0.00 |
| 2006 | 0.00 | 0% | 0 | 178,223,624 | 0.00 |
| Total | 35.10 | 6,192 | 30.60 |
AUSS aims to maximize value creation for the benefit of shareholders by constantly striving to achieve good results. Over time, the target is to pay out between 20% and 40% of the Group`s net profit as dividends (excluding the value adjustment of biological assets).
Basic earnings per share are calculated by dividing the profit attributable to equity holders of the company by the weighted average number of ordinary shares in issue during the year.
Business combinations and transactions with non-controlling interests in 2021:
The Group increased its ownership in Dragøy Grossist AS from 34% to 51% the 1st of January 2021. The acquisition is recognised as a step-by-step acquisition, with a new measurement and calculation of gain/losses on the shares that was previously acquired. Until transaction date the previously acquired shares have been recognised and booked as an associated company, following the equity method. The shares are held by Lerøy Nord AS. The acquired company is a wholesaler in Tromsø.
The Group increased its ownership in Sørøya Isanlegg AS from 33.3% to 100% the 1st of January 2021. The acquisition is recognised as a step-by-step acquisition, with a new measurement and calculation of gain/losses on the shares that was previously acquired. Until transaction date the previously acquired shares have been recognised and booked as an associated company, following the equity method. The shares are held by Lerøy Norway Seafoods AS. The acquired company is a service provider for the white fish industry. The company operates from Hasvik.
The Group acquired 100% of FMV Eiendom AS the 31st of March 2021. The name of the acquired company was changed to Lerøy Årskog AS. The acquisition was recognised at fair value. The company was purchased from the ultimate parent company of the group, Laco AS, and is therefore identified as a related party transaction. An external valuation of the company was required and used as the basis for the purchase price. The shares are held by Lerøy Seafood Group ASA. The acquired company owns land
areas regulated and approved for production of smolt, salmon and trout on land, with a total maximum volume of 10 thousand MTB. The land area is in Fitjar. Groundwork related to buildings and installments has been started.
The Group increased its ownership in Seafood Danmark A/S from 33.3% to 77.6% the 1st of April 2021. The acquisition is recognised as a step-by-step acquisition, with a new measurement and calculation of gain/losses on the shares that was previously acquired. Accumulated currency exchange differences until date of business combination, previously recognised in other comprehensive income, is recycled over profit and loss, and included in the calculated gain. Until transaction date the previously acquired shares have been recognised and booked as an associated company, following the equity method. The shares are held by Lerøy Seafood Group ASA. The business in the acquired company is VAP, sales and distribution in Danmark. The company owns and operate several production facilities in Denmark.
The non-controlling interests in the company named Wannebo International AS was redeemed the 1st of July 2021. As the company is a group company, owned through Seafood Danmark A/S, the redemption amount has been recognised as an equity transaction. The company`s business purpose is purchasing seafood in Norway and exporting it from Norway to Seafood Danmark A/S.
The Group has also participated indirectly in the acquisition of Grieg Seafood Hjaltland UK Ltd through the 50% owned associated company Norskott Havbruk AS. The acquiring legal entity was Scottish Seafarms Ltd, a fully owned subsidiary of Norskott Havbruk AS. The name of the acquired company was changed to SSF Hjaltland Ltd right after the date of control, the 15th of December 2021. This transaction is not included in business combinations of the Group, according to IFRS 3, which are summarized below. For this transaction, it is referred to the note on associated companies for further details.
| Summary of business combinations | Dragøy Grossist AS |
Lerøy Årskog AS |
Seafood Danmark A/S |
Sørøya Isanlegg AS |
Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ownership until date of acquisition | 34.0% | 0.0% | 33.3% | 33.3% | |
| Increased ownership | 17.0% | 100.0% | 44.3% | 66.7% | |
| Ownership after date of acquisition | 51.0% | 100.0% | 77.6% | 100.0% | |
| Date of recognition (business combination) | 01.01.2021 | 31.03.2021 | 01.04.2021 | 01.01.2021 | |
| Total consideration | 3 | 39 | 207 | 1 | 249 |
| Hereby consideration paid in 2021 | 3 | 39 | 158 | 1 | 200 |
Herby unpaid as of 31.12.2021, accrued contingent consideration 49
| Acquisition balance sheet incl. excess value and goodwill * |
Dragøy Grossist AS |
Lerøy Årskog AS |
Seafood Danmark A/S |
Sørøya Isanlegg AS |
Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Intangibles | 14 | 5 | 285 | 0 | 304 |
| Right-of-use assets | 2 | 0 | 10 | 0 | 12 |
| Fixed assets | 1 | 59 | 194 | 4 | 257 |
| Financial non-current assets | 0 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 5 |
| Inventory | 1 | 0 | 156 | 0 | 157 |
| Receivables | 4 | 0 | 229 | 0 | 234 |
| Bank deposits | 3 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 |
| Total assets | 25 | 64 | 879 | 5 | 972 |
| Equity including NCI | 16 | 39 | 473 | 1 | 530 |
| Long-term debt | 3 | 11 | 74 | 3 | 91 |
| Short-term debt | 5 | 15 | 332 | 0 | 351 |
| Total debt | 25 | 64 | 879 | 5 | 972 |
| Net interest bearing debt (NIBD) | -1 | 14 | 179 | 1 | 193 |
* On date of acquisition, and on 100% basis
CI = Controlling interests (majority)
NCI = Non-controlling interests (minority)
Austevoll Seafood ASA Annual report 2021 71
| Shares owned from before (as associated comp.) on date of step-by-step acquisition |
|||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Acquired shares in |
Shares acquired earlier |
Change in value from equity |
Gain from new measurement |
Total | Total | ||
| Total all business combinations | 2021 | at cost | method | of value | Total CI | NCI | Group |
| Consideration consists of | |||||||
| Consideration paid | 200 | 81 | 0 | 0 | 281 | 0 | 281 |
| Contingent consideration accrued, to be paid in 2022 | 49 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 49 | 0 | 49 |
| Calculated hypothetical consideration from new measurement | 0 | 0 | 49 | 32 | 81 | 0 | 81 |
| Calculated hypothetical consideration on NCI`s share | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 113 | 113 |
| Total | 249 | 81 | 49 | 32 | 411 | 113 | 524 |
| Consideration exceeding acquired share of equity | |||||||
| Acquired share of equity | 169 | 127 | 0 | 0 | 296 | 86 | 383 |
| Consideration including gain from new measurement | 249 | 81 | 49 | 32 | 411 | 113 | 524 |
| Total | 80 | -46 | 49 | 32 | 115 | 26 | 141 |
| Identified added value | |||||||
| Added value from customer portifolio (intangibles) | 1 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 | 8 |
| Added value from fixed assets | 49 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 49 | 0 | 49 |
| Deducted value from non recognised liabilities | -7 | -6 | 0 | 0 | -13 | -4 | -17 |
| Deferred tax related to added and deducted value | -9 | 1 | 0 | 0 | -9 | 0 | -9 |
| Goodwill recognised in the acquired equity | -76 | -57 | 0 | 0 | -133 | -38 | -171 |
| Net added and deducted values | -42 | -59 | 0 | 0 | -102 | -38 | -140 |
| Identified values | |||||||
| Recognised equity in acquired companies | 169 | 127 | 0 | 0 | 296 | 86 | 383 |
| Net added and deducted values | -42 | -59 | 0 | 0 | -102 | -38 | -140 |
| Total | 127 | 68 | 0 | 0 | 195 | 48 | 243 |
| Fair value, including NCI in acquired equity | |||||||
| Consideration (fair value) | 249 | 81 | 49 | 32 | 411 | 113 | 524 |
| NCI in acquired equity | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 6 |
| Total | 249 | 81 | 49 | 32 | 411 | 119 | 530 |
| Calculation of goodwill | |||||||
| Consideration (fair value) excluding NCI in acquired equity | 249 | 81 | 49 | 32 | 411 | 113 | 524 |
| Identified values | 127 | 68 | 0 | 0 | 195 | 48 | 243 |
| Goodwill | 123 | 13 | 49 | 32 | 217 | 65 | 281 |
| Fair value consist of | |||||||
| Recognised equity | 169 | 127 | 0 | 0 | 296 | 86 | 383 |
| Net added and deducted values | -42 | -59 | 0 | 0 | -102 | -38 | -140 |
| Goodwill | 123 | 13 | 49 | 32 | 217 | 65 | 281 |
| Total | 249 | 81 | 49 | 32 | 411 | 113 | 524 |
| Cash flow effects | |||||||
| Consideration paid related to business combinations | 200 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 200 |
| Redemption of NCI Total |
0 200 |
0 0 |
0 0 |
0 0 |
0 0 |
6 6 |
6 206 |
The acquisition of Seafood Danmark A/S is a material business combination.
The Seafood Danmark A/S-group is consolidated with effect from 1st of April 2021. Thus, the consolidated profit and loss amounts consists of 9 out of 12 months.
| Profit and loss figures for Seafood Danmark A/S group: | Consolidated 2nd-4th quarter |
2021 Not Consolidated 1st quarter |
Total 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sales revenues | 1,410 | 399 | 1,810 | 1,685 |
| Other gains (+) and losses (-) | 5 | 0 | 5 | 0 |
| Operating profit (EBIT) | 76 | 22 | 98 | 102 |
| Pre-tax profit | 73 | 21 | 94 | 98 |
| Profit after tax | 54 | 16 | 70 | 87 |
| Items included as comprehensive income | 2 | 1 | 3 | -4 |
| Shares owned from before (as associated comp.) 33.3% |
|||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Acquired shares in 2021 |
Shares acquired earlier |
Change in value from equity |
Gain from new measurement |
Total CI | Total NCI |
Total Group |
|
| Acquisition analysis for Seafood Danmark A/S | (44.25%) | at cost | method | of value | (77.6%) | (22.4%) | (100%) |
| Consideration consists of | |||||||
| Consideration paid | 158 | 77 | 235 | 0 | 235 | ||
| Contingent consideration accrued, to be paid in 2022 | 49 | 49 | 0 | 49 | |||
| Calculated hypothetical consideration from new measurement | 48 | 30 | 79 | 0 | 79 | ||
| Calculated hypothetical consideration on NCI`s share | 0 | 105 | 105 | ||||
| Total | 207 | 77 | 48 | 30 | 363 | 105 | 467 |
| Consideration exceeding acquired share of equity | |||||||
| Acquired share of equity | 166 | 125 | 292 | 84 | 376 | ||
| Consideration including gain from new measurement | 207 | 77 | 48 | 30 | 363 | 105 | 467 |
| Total | 40 | -48 | 48 | 30 | 71 | 20 | 91 |
| Identified added value | |||||||
| Deducted value from non recognised liabilities | -7 | -5 | 0 | 0 | -13 | -4 | -16 |
| Deferred tax related to added and deducted value | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 4 |
| Goodwill recognised in the acquired equity | -76 | -57 | 0 | 0 | -133 | -38 | -171 |
| Net added and deducted values | -81 | -61 | 0 | 0 | -143 | -41 | -184 |
| Identified values | |||||||
| Recognised equity in acquired companies | 166 | 125 | 0 | 0 | 292 | 84 | 376 |
| Net added and deducted values | -81 | -61 | 0 | 0 | -143 | -41 | -184 |
| Total | 85 | 64 | 0 | 0 | 149 | 43 | 192 |
| Fair value, including NCI in acquired equity | |||||||
| Consideration (fair value) | 207 | 77 | 48 | 30 | 363 | 105 | 467 |
| NCI in acquired equity | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 6 |
| Total | 207 | 77 | 48 | 30 | 363 | 111 | 473 |
| Shares owned from before (as associated comp.) 33.3% |
|||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Acquisition analysis for Seafood Danmark A/S | Acquired shares in 2021 (44.25%) |
Shares acquired earlier at cost |
Change in value from equity method |
Gain from new measurement of value |
Total CI (77.6%) |
Total NCI (22.4%) |
Total Group (100%) |
| Calculation of goodwill | |||||||
| Consideration (fair value) excluding NCI in acquired equity | 207 | 77 | 48 | 30 | 363 | 105 | 467 |
| Identified values | 85 | 64 | 0 | 0 | 149 | 43 | 192 |
| Goodwill | 122 | 13 | 48 | 30 | 213 | 62 | 275 |
| Fair value consist of | |||||||
| Recognised equity | 166 | 125 | 0 | 0 | 292 | 84 | 376 |
| Net added and deducted values | -81 | -61 | 0 | 0 | -143 | -41 | -184 |
| Goodwill | 122 | 13 | 48 | 30 | 213 | 62 | 275 |
| Total | 207 | 77 | 48 | 30 | 363 | 105 | 467 |
| Cash flow effects | |||||||
| Consideration paid related to business combinations | 158 | 158 | |||||
| Redemption of NCI | 6 | 6 | |||||
| Total | 158 | 6 | 164 |
In 2020, there have not been any significant business combinations,
and there have been insignificant transactions with non-controlling interests.
The group recognises and measures biological assets (fish in sea) at fair value. For salmon and trout, including parent fish, a present value model is applied to estimate fair value. For roe, fry, smolt and cleaner fish, historical cost provides the best estimate of fair value.
The fair value of fish in the sea is estimated as a function of the estimated biomass at the time of harvest, multiplied by the estimated sales price. For fish not ready for harvest, a deduction is made to cover estimated residual costs to grow the fish to optimal harvest weight. The cash flow is discounted monthly by a discount rate. Please refer to note 29 accounting policies for more detailed information.
Fair value adjustment recognised in the period related to biological assets comprises: (1) change in fair value adjustment of biological assets, (2) change in fair value (provision) of loss-making contracts and (3) change in unrealised gain/loss of financial sale and purchase contracts (derivatives) for fish in Fish Pool. The last mentioned adjustment does only include Fish Pool contracts included in the balance sheet at the beginning of the year. For new contracts entered into in 2021 the change in fair value are recognised as other comprehensive income (OCI) due to cash flow hedging.
The Group enters into contracts related to future deliveries of salmon and trout. As biological assets are recognised at fair value, the fair value adjustment of the biological assets will be included in the estimated expenses required to fulfill the contract. This implies that the Group may experience loss-making (onerous) contracts according to IAS 37 even if the contract price for physical delivery contracts is higher than the actual production cost for the products. In such a scenario, a provision is made for the estimated negative value. The provision is classified in the financial statements as other short-term debt. The Group also enters into Fish Pool contracts to hedge prices. The number of such contracts is limited. When utilised, the Fish Pool contracts are recorded as financial instruments on the balance sheet (derivatives), where unrealised gain is classified as other short-term receivables and unrealised loss as other short-term debt.
| Carrying amount of biological assets | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|
| Fish in sea at historical cost * | 4,320 | 4,497 |
| Fry, brood, smolt and cleaner fish at cost * | 386 | 362 |
| Total biological assets before fair value adjustment | 4,705 | 4,859 |
| Fair value adjustment of biological assets | 1,467 | 307 |
| Total biological assets | 6,173 | 5,166 |
| Fair value of fish in sea | 5,787 | 4,804 |
| Fair value of fry, brood, smolt and cleaner fish | 386 | 362 |
| Total biological assets | 6,173 | 5,166 |
| * Historical cost minus expensed mortality | ||
| Carrying amount of loss-making contracts | ||
| Total loss-making contracts in the SOFP at 31.12. | 44 | 0 |
| Recognised fair value adjustment related to biological assets | ||
| Change in fair value adjustment of biological assets (fish in sea) | 1,160 | -981 |
| Change in fair value of loss-making contracts | -44 | 26 |
| Change in fair value of Fish Pool contracts | -2 | 0 |
| Total fair value adjustments related to biological assets | 1,114 | -954 |
| Reconciliation of carrying amount of fair value related to biological assets | ||
| Fair value adjustment of biological assets at 01.01. | 306 | 1,287 |
| Change in fair value adjustment on fish in sea | 1,160 | -981 |
| Fair value adjustment of biological assets at 31.12. | 1,467 | 306 |
The balance sheet item is included in biological assets. The accounting line is further specified below.
| Reconciliation of changes in carrying amount of biological assets | Roe, fry, smolt and cleaner fish * |
Fish in sea (salmon and trout) * |
Fair value adjustment |
Total biological assets |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Biological assets at 31.12.2019 | 343 | 4,279 | 1,287 | 5,910 |
| Changes in 2020 | ||||
| Increase from biological transformation (released and net growth) | 840 | 6,931 | 0 | 7,770 |
| Reduction due to sale and own consumption (smolt and cleaner fish) | -821 | 0 | 0 | -821 |
| Reduction due to harvest | 0 | -6,450 | 0 | -6,450 |
| Reduction due to incident-based mortality | 0 | -263 | 0 | -263 |
| Reduction due to accidental release | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Net change in fair value (fish in sea) | 0 | 0 | -981 | -981 |
| Biological assets at 31.12.2020 | 361 | 4,497 | 306 | 5,166 |
| Changes in 2021 | ||||
| Increase from biological transformation (released and net growth) | 1,120 | 7,613 | 0 | 8,734 |
| Reduction due to sale and own consumption (smolt and cleaner fish) | -1,097 | 0 | 0 | -1,097 |
| Reduction due to harvest | 0 | -7,615 | 0 | -7,615 |
| Reduction due to incident-based mortality | 0 | -175 | 0 | -175 |
| Reduction due to accidental release | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Net change in fair value (fish in sea) | 0 | 0 | 1,160 | 1,160 |
| Biological assets at 31.12.2021 | 385 | 4,320 | 1,466 | 6,173 |
* Carrying amount before fair value adjustment (historical cost minus charged mortality)
| Reconciliation of volume (LWT) for stock of fish in sea | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|
| Live weight (LWT) of fish in sea at 01.01. (tonnes) | 125,100 | 116,296 |
| Changes through the year | ||
| Increase from biological transformation (released and net growth) | 225,972 | 232,054 |
| Reduction due to harvesting | -228,058 | -209,442 |
| Reduction due to incident-based mortality | -11,393 | -13,807 |
| Reduction due to accidental release | 0 | -2 |
| Live weight of fish in sea at 31.12. (tonnes) | 111,622 | 125,100 |
The table below shows the total volume of fish in sea, living weight measured in tonnes, distributed by weight:
| Volume (LWT) - Overview of fish in sea at 31.12. | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|
| Fish in sea, 0-1 kg | 9,592 | 10,766 |
| Fish in sea, 1-2 kg | 20,262 | 15,700 |
| Fish in sea, 2-3 kg | 26,084 | 36,427 |
| Fish in sea, 3-4 kg | 32,921 | 34,600 |
| Fish in sea: salmon 4-4.65 kg, trout 4-4.76 kg | 17,399 | 19,806 |
| Fish in sea: salmon > 4.65 kg, trout > 4.76 kg (ready for harvest) | 5,363 | 7,802 |
| Fish in sea, total salmon and trout | 111,622 | 125,100 |
| By species and main group | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|
| Fish ready for harvest | 5,363 | 7,802 |
| Salmon (fish of live weight > 4.65 kg) | 4,776 | 7,802 |
| Trout (fish of live weight > 4.76 kg) | 587 | 0 |
| Fish not ready for harvest | 106,258 | 117,298 |
| Salmon (fish of live weight < 4.65 kg) | 93,146 | 103,636 |
| Trout (fish of live weight < 4.76 kg) | 13,112 | 13,662 |
| Total volume | 111,622 | 125,100 |
| Salmon | 97,923 | 111,438 |
| Trout | 13,699 | 13,662 |
| Number of individuals | ||
| Total number, all groups (in 1,000) | 55,214 | 58,051 |
| Price parameters | Net | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 - Estimated forward price through expected harvesting period | Forward price * | Exporter fee | Clearing cost | forward price |
| Q1 2021 | 50.33 | -0.75 | -0.185 | 49.40 |
| Q2 2021 | 56.77 | -0.75 | -0.185 | 55.83 |
| Q3 2021 | 53.67 | -0.75 | -0.185 | 52.73 |
| Q4 2021 | 55.83 | -0.75 | -0.185 | 54.90 |
| Q1 2022 | 60.30 | -0.75 | -0.185 | 59.37 |
| Q2 2022 | 63.40 | -0.75 | -0.185 | 62.47 |
| Price parameters 2021 - Estimated forward price through expected harvesting period |
Forward price * | Exporter fee | Clearing cost | Net forward price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 2022 | 67.73 | -0.75 | -0.185 | 66.80 |
| Q2 2022 | 67.30 | -0.75 | -0.185 | 66.37 |
| Q3 2022 | 55.50 | -0.75 | -0.185 | 54.57 |
| Q4 2022 | 61.33 | -0.75 | -0.185 | 60.40 |
| Q1 2023 | 64.07 | -0.75 | -0.185 | 63.14 |
| Q2 2023 | 64.57 | -0.75 | -0.185 | 63.64 |
* Quarterly forward price based on monthly forward prices sourced from Fish Pool at 30.12.
| Adjustments are also made for | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|
| Price premium (+/-) for trout | -2.00 | -6.00 |
| Price premium (+/-) for organic salmon | 15.00 | 30.00 |
| Reduction for quality deviations, salmon | -1.30 | -0.79 |
| Reduction for quality deviations, trout | -1.68 | -1.68 |
| Reduction for size deviations, salmon | -0.26 | -0.21 |
| Reduction for size deviations, trout | -0.80 | -0.80 |
Deductions are also made for well boat services, harvesting and packaging (primary processing), and transport to Oslo from the locality being measured.
Based on the above parameters, an estimated net price is calculated for each locality, and is then included in the cash flow calculation in relation to the assessment of fair value. In connection with the sensitivity analysis conducted in the note on significant accounting estimates and assessments, an estimated average net price is applied to all sizes. This is calculated by dividing the total estimated net sales revenue per locality by the total estimated volume (measured as harvest weight), based on projected weight on the date of harvest.
| 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|
| Calculated average net prices, all sizes (NOK/kg) | 56.10 | 49.40 |
| Other parameters | ||
| Projected mortality in relation to number of individuals per month in North Norway | 0.45% | 0.50% |
| Projected mortality in relation to number of individuals per month in Central Norway | 0.60% | 0.67% |
| Projected mortality in relation to number of individuals per month in West Norway | 1.10% | 1.25% |
| Factor used for gutting waste, salmon | 14% | 14% |
| Factor used for gutting waste, trout | 16% | 16% |
| Projected harvest weight, salmon | 4.65 kg | 4.65 kg |
| Projected harvest weight, trout | 4.76 kg | 4.76 kg |
| Discount rate (monthly) * | 4-5% | 5% |
* One smaller company in the Group applied the discount of 5% in 2021
For the Group, all accidental release is taken seriously, and the Group's target is zero accidental release. Accidental release may however occur randomly due to unforeseen incidents. All accidental releases are reported to the Directorate of Fisheries, irrespective of the scope of the accident. This applies even if the accident only involves one fish. The Group has not experienced any accidental release of economic significance in 2021. In total only 4 (four) individuals have escaped, from a total stock of approximately 53 million individuals. The accidental release consists of three different incidents. These incidents are further described in the annual report, available at www.auss.no.
The Group defines mortality as abnormal when more than 1.5% of the total number of fish die in the space of one month. For more detailed information, see the note on biological assets (I).
Abnormal mortality is defined as incident-based mortality, and is charged to the income statement in the period in which it occurs. In 2021, incident-based mortality has predominantly been caused by the repercussions of lice treatments.
Fish health, including minimising mortality, is the cornerstone of the Group's strategy. The positive trend in the number of sea lice treatments and related mortality, have continued in 2022.
| 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|
| Raw materials | 690 | 444 |
| Work in progress | 5 | 50 |
| Finished goods | 1,252 | 1,102 |
| Impairment due to loss in value and obsolescence | -15 | -27 |
| Total | 1,932 | 1,569 |
| Impairment of inventories expensed during the year | 8 | 4 |
| 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|
| Trade receivables | 2,345 | 2,073 |
| Minus: provision for bad debts | -24 | -27 |
| Trade receivables – net | 2,321 | 2,045 |
| Other current receivables | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|
| Prepayments | 95 | 112 |
| Receivables from related parties | 1 | 0 |
| Loans to related parties | 2 | 7 |
| Short-term loans provided | 30 | 31 |
| Public fees and taxes, credit balance | 358 | 291 |
| Currency forward contracts and assets recognised in the SOFP due to fair value hedging | 62 | 111 |
| Insurance compensation receivable | 0 | 37 |
| Short-term loans | 18 | 51 |
| Other current receivables | 151 | 115 |
| Total other current receivables | 717 | 754 |
| Total current receivables | 3,038 | 2,799 |
| Other non-current receivables | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|
| Loans to related parties | 31 | 31 |
| Loans to third parties | 92 | 91 |
| Other non-current receivables | 45 | 41 |
| Total non-current receivables | 168 | 164 |
| Age distribution for trade receivables past due but not impaired | 2021 | 2020 |
| 0 to 3 months | 330 | 332 |
| 3 to 6 months | 12 | 69 |
| Over 6 months | 5 | 28 |
| Total | 347 | 428 |
| Age distribution for trade receivables past due and impaired | 2021 | 2020 |
| 0 to 3 months | 5 | 4 |
| 3 to 6 months | 0 | 2 |
| Over 6 months | 14 | 20 |
| Total | 19 | 27 |
The Group's trade receivables of MNOK 2,321 are partly covered by credit insurance and other types of security. Trade receivables per 31.12. were nominally MNOK 2,345 while provisions for bad debts were amounted to MNOK 24.
Trade receivables, past due but not impaired was MNOK 347 per 31.12. A major part of the trade receivables, past due but not impaired are related to the subsidiary LSG with MNOK 280 of the amount overdue. Per end of February 2022 more than 95.6% of the customer receivables related to LSG are paid.
| Carrying amount of trade receivables and other short-term receivables per currency | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|
| USD | 397 | 334 |
| GBP | 33 | 17 |
| EUR | 965 | 777 |
| NOK | 1,260 | 1,341 |
| DKK | 123 | 0 |
| CLP | 17 | 31 |
| PEN | 71 | 53 |
| SEK | 124 | 168 |
| JPY | 33 | 29 |
| Others | 15 | 49 |
| Total | 3,038 | 2,799 |
| The change in provision for bad debts is as follows | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|
| At 01.01. | -27 | -21 |
| Change in provisions for the year | 0 | 1 |
| Provision for bad debts for the year | 1 | -8 |
| Exchange differences | 2 | 0 |
| Reversed provisions for bad debts | 0 | 0 |
| At 31.12. | -24 | -27 |
| Licences, white | Licences, pelagic | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 | Goodwill | Licences, fish farming, Norway |
fish and pelagic fisheries, Norway |
fisheries, South America |
Brands | Total |
| At 01.01. | ||||||
| Acquisition cost | 2,105 | 4,201 | 4,444 | 1,230 | 50 | 12,031 |
| Accumulated depreciation and amortisation | 0 | -190 | -212 | -30 | 0 | -433 |
| Accumulated impairment | -128 | -18 | 0 | -21 | 0 | -168 |
| Carrying amount at 01.01. | 1,977 | 3,993 | 4,232 | 1,179 | 50 | 11,430 |
| Carrying amount at 01.01. | 1,977 | 3,993 | 4,232 | 1,179 | 50 | 11,430 |
| Exchange differences | -18 | -5 | -71 | 0 | -92 | |
| Additions for the year | 0 | 183 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 183 |
| Disposals for the year | -2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | -2 |
| Depreciation and amortisation | -20 | -28 | -2 | 0 | -50 | |
| Impairment/reversal of impairment | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Carrying amount at 31.12. | 1,958 | 4,156 | 4,199 | 1,106 | 50 | 11,468 |
| At 31.12. | ||||||
| Acquisition cost | 2,086 | 4,410 | 4,439 | 1,159 | 50 | 12,144 |
| Accumulated depreciation and amortisation | 0 | -236 | -240 | -33 | 0 | -508 |
| Accumulated impairment | -128 | -18 | 0 | -21 | 0 | -168 |
| Carrying amount at 31.12. | 1,958 | 4,156 | 4,199 | 1,106 | 50 | 11,468 |
| - of which assets with indefinite lives | 1,958 | 4,154 | 3,785 | 1,106 | 50 | 11,053 |
| - of which assets with definite lives | 0 | 2 | 413 | 0 | 0 | 415 |
| - remaining years for assets with definite useful lives (years) | 10-12 | 9 -14 |
| Licences, fish | Licences, white fish and pelagic |
Licences, pelagic fisheries, |
||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | Goodwill | farming, Norway | fisheries, Norway | South America | Brands | Total |
| Carrying amount at 01.01. | 1,958 | 4,156 | 4,199 | 1,106 | 50 | 11,468 |
| Exchange differences | -22 | 11 | -15 | 0 | -24 | |
| Business combinations | 281 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 282 |
| Additions for the year | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| Disposals for the year | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Depreciation and amortisation | 0 | -21 | -28 | -2 | 0 | -51 |
| Impairment/reversal of impairment | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Carrying amount at 31.12. | 2,218 | 4,139 | 4,182 | 1,090 | 50 | 11,679 |
| At 31.12. | ||||||
| Acquisition cost | 2,346 | 4,439 | 4,449 | 1,145 | 50 | 12,429 |
| Accumulated depreciation and amortisation | 0 | -282 | -267 | -35 | 0 | -584 |
| Accumulated impairment | -128 | -18 | 0 | -21 | 0 | -168 |
| Carrying amount at 31.12. | 2,218 | 4,139 | 4,182 | 1,090 | 50 | 11,679 |
| - of which assets with indefinite lives | 4,159 | 3,796 | 1,090 | 50 | 11,312 | |
| - of which assets with definite lives | -19 | 385 | 0 | 0 | 366 | |
| - remaining years for assets with definite useful lives (years) | 10-12 | 8 -13 |
Included in licences fishfarming above is a privilege for utilisation of waterfalls with definite useful lives.
Every corporate subsidiary in the AUSS Group is classified as one group of CGUs in order to allow for the distribution of goodwill for impairment testing. Goodwill and intangible assets with an indefinite useful life are not amortised, but shall be tested for impairment at least once a year – or when there are indications of impairment – and written down if their value can no longer be justified. Useful life is utilised as a main rule when establishing recoverable amount. Useful life is estimated as the present value of future cash flows. The present value is compared with the book value per CGU or group of CGUs. The present value estimate is based on the budget for the next year and the estimated profit/ loss over the next four years. A terminal value is estimated for the period following the next five years. The Gordon growth model is applied to estimate terminal value.
Goodwill and intangible assets with indefinite useful life (which is not depreciated) is distributed on the different groups as follows:
| Carrying amount of intangible assets per CGU | Goodwill | Licences | Trademarks | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lerøy Seafood Group ASA | 1,773 | 7,555 | 50 | 9,379 | |
| Br. Birkeland AS | 169 | 588 | 0 | 757 | |
| Br. Birkeland Farming AS | 21 | 174 | 0 | 195 | |
| Austral Group S.A.A. | 253 | 743 | 0 | 996 | |
| FoodCorp Chile S.A. | 0 | 352 | 0 | 352 | |
| Total | 2,217 | 9,412 | 50 | 11,679 |
LSG is a fully-integrated seafood company and comprises the entire value chain, from roe, fry, smolt, farming of Atlantic salmon and trout, catching white fish and processing to sales and distribution. LSG has following fish farming licences; 31 licences in the North of Norway (incl. slaughter cage-, parent fish-, demonstration- and teaching licences), 61 licences (incl. slaughter cage, parent fish-, demonstration- and teaching licences) in Central Norway and 63 (incl. slaughter cage, parent fish-, green farming-, demonstration- and teaching licences) in West Norway. LSG group has also 20 licences for juvenile fish and 6 licences for cleaner fish, and licences to cultivate seaweed in connection with localities for production of salmon. The following rates are applied for tests of possible impairment: discount rate (WACC after tax of 7.3%, and a nominal rate of 2.0%. LSG's impairment tests did not produce grounds for write-down of goodwill or intangible assets with an indefinite useful life in 2021 and 2020. The management's calculations are robust in the face of reasonable changes in conditions in the future, and a change of all essential elements with 10-15% will not cause requirement of write-down. Within aquaculture, historically up to 2012, the Group has experienced a significant production growth per license in Norway. Since 2012 and until today the growth has been low. The model is based on an assumption of 2% growth in volume produced.
The licences in this segment are owned by the sub-group, Lerøy Havfisk AS (Havfisk) (vessel owning subsidiaries). The licences are governed by an obligation to supply products to the regions where the licences are located, i.e. Finnmark and Nordland. This implies that buyers in those regions have priority over other buyers of fish. The details of the supply obligation are stipulated in the licence terms for the individual licence unit. This may be a region but could also be a specific buyer. The principle for pricing is the average price realised for the species of fish in question over the past two weeks, taking into account condition, size and quality. Havfisk is also subject to a so-called "industrial obligation" (obligation to keep the business going) in Stamsund, Melbu, Hammerfest, Båtsfjord, Honningsvåg and Kjøllefjord. This implies that the licence is linked to operation of the facilities in the respective locations. Havfisk has however leased out the facilities in these locations. The lessee is LNWS (group). The lessee is responsible for sustaining operations. If the lessee terminates operations, the licence terms oblige Havfisk to sustain operations in the specified locations.
At the end of the financial year, the Havfisk group owned 29.6 cod and haddock trawling licences, 31.9 saithe trawling licences, 8 shrimp trawling licences and 2 greater silver licences in Norway. These licences are owned via the subsidiaries Nordland Havfiske AS, Finnmark Havfiske AS and Hammerfest Industrifiske AS. It has not been acquired or sold quotas/licences in 2021. One trawling vessel has been sold from one company to another within Havfisk group in order to achieve maximum utilization of the quotas in the coming years.
A licence for cod, haddock and saithe is a licence that entitles the holder to trawl for whitefish in the zone north of 62 degrees latitude and in the North Sea at certain times of the year. Correspondingly, a licence for shrimp and greater silver entitles the holder to fish for shrimp and greater silver. In 2021 (2020), each vessel was permitted up to four (four) quota units, including the quota connected to the vessel. The volume of fish allowed per licence unit is stipulated annually by the Norwegian Ministry of Trade, Industry and Fisheries. Moreover, transfers may be made between the different groups of vessels throughout the year, in the event that one group of vessels is not able to fish its share of the quota. This is known as "re-allocation". In 2021 (2020), one cod licence entitled the holder to fish for 1,404 (1,196) tonnes of cod, 578 (474) tonnes of haddock and 514 (440) tonnes of saithe in the zone north of 62 degrees latitude. When compared with the final licence volumes after re-allocations for 2021 (2020), this is a change of +17% (+8%) for cod, +17% (+10%) for haddock and +22% (+16%) for saithe. During the year, the quota for both haddock and saithe was increased and some quotas were re-allocated for these species. The shrimp and greater silver licences have no limit in terms of volume.
In order to improve profitability for fisheries and reduce the number of vessels in operation, the fisheries authorities have implemented schemes allowing for companies to merge several quota units per vessel in return for the permanent removal of vessels that have handed over their quotas from the registry of fisheries. Each vessel has one cod trawling permit, a so-called basic quota. Vessels can also have structural quotas for cod trawling. In total, one vessel cannot have more than four quotas per fish species. The structural quotas have a limited duration according to the scheme in place when the quota was structured. In principle, there are two schemes for structural quotas, comprising 20 and 25 years' duration. The new scheme for structural quotas was introduced in 2007. Structural quotas allocated before 2007 have a duration of 25 years starting in 2008, while quotas allocated after 2007 have a duration of 20 years.
The main purpose of the structure schemes is to reduce the number of vessels participating in individual fisheries, thereby facilitating improved profitability for the remaining vessels – i.e. improving efficiency within a regulated framework. Moreover, the schemes are intended to adapt fleet capacity to the basic resources. At
the end of the duration of 20 and 25 years respectively, the structural quotas are no longer valid and the total quotas will be distributed among all parties in the regulation group in question, as basic quotas. Basic quotas do not have any time limits.
Havfisk – and LNWS to a limited extent – is involved in fishing in Norway pursuant to the provisions in inter alia the Act relating to the right to participate in fishing and catches (Participant Act). Havfisk has been given an exemption from the requirement stating that the controlling interest must be an active fisherman. The Participant Act and supporting legislation stipulate inter alia that any changes to ownership of a company that directly or indirectly owns fishing vessels requires approval by the relevant authorities. The Ministry of Trade, Industry and Fisheries' approval of LSG's acquisition of the majority shareholding in Havfisk was granted on the basis of LSG's ownership on the date of the approval. The approval also states that no new applications are required for future changes in ownership of Havfisk, LSG and AUSS provided that LSG continues to own minimum 60% of the shares in Havfisk and that AUSS continues to own minimum 50% of the shares in LSG. However, the approval does not allow for changes in ownership that result in Laco AS directly owning less than 55.55% of the shares in AUSS. Any significant changes in ownership in Laco AS also require approval. The approval also requires continuation of the prevailing terms related to permits for the vessels and structural quotas, in addition to compliance with the nationality requirement in section 5 of the Participant Act. Pursuant to the nationality requirement in section 5 of the Participant Act, operating permits can only be granted to parties that are Norwegian citizens or have status that equals Norwegian citizenship. According to the second paragraph letra a) of the provision, limited companies, public limited companies and other companies with limited liability have equal status to Norwegian citizens when the company's head office and Board of Directors are located in Norway, when the majority of the Board members, including the Chairman of the Board, are Norwegian citizens resident in Norway and who have lived in Norway for the last two years, and when Norwegian citizens own shares or stocks corresponding to minimum 6/10 of the company's capital and have voting rights in the company with minimum 6/10 of the votes. Havfisk, LSG and AUSS are obliged to submit an overview twice a year detailing the company's shareholders, including specification of the shares held by foreign shareholders. Ultimately, a breach of the abovementioned licence provisions could result in Havfisk losing its licence rights.
BRBI owns four fishing vessels, two of which are pelagic ring net/ trawlers. The pelagic vessels each had a 681 basic ton ring net licence and a 1,425 trawling licence. One vessel fish for snow crab and have an onboard factory where the product is processed to completion. In September 2021, BRBI purchased a second-hand fishing vessel to replace the "Northguider", which sank off the coast of Spitzbergen in December 2018. The vessel has been undergoing conversion/installation of factory, which was completed at the end of January 2022. The vessel started up snow crab fishing at the end of February 2022.
For licences related to pelagic fishing, the last known turnover figure has been applied for impairment tests, and this indicates a sound margin in relation to book values.
BFARM group owns seven licences for farming Atlantic salmon in West Norway.
The following rates are applied for tests of possible impairment for farming licences: discount rate (WACC) after tax of 7.3%, insignificant growth in volume produced, and an inflation rate of 2%. BFARM's impairment tests did not produce grounds for writedown of goodwill or intangible assets with an indefinite useful life in 2021 and 2020. The management's calculations regarding farming licences are robust in the face of reasonable changes in conditions in the future.
Austral is a fully-integrated fishing company involved in catches, processing and sales. Austral has fishing rights for anchoveta and horse mackerel/mackerel in Peru. The company has a total anchoveta quota that represents 6.98% of the total quota for Central/North Peru, and just less than 4% of the quota in South Peru. Austral's product range comprises fishmeal and fish oil, in addition to canned and frozen products directly for the consumer market. Austral's business is reliant on fish caught in the wild. The company would not be able sustain the long-term values generated by its licences without sustainable management of resources. Moreover, natural weather phenomena will have an impact on conditions at sea and may cause periodic, short-term fluctuations in biomass and quota sizes from year to year. There are two main seasons for anchoveta – the first from April to July and the second from November to January. Resource management is carried out by Instituto del Mar de Peru (IMARPE). Prior to each fishing season, IMARPE carries out a measurement of biomass and recommends quota sizes on the basis of their finds. Cash flows after tax and an equivalent discount rate (WACC) after tax of 7.2%, nominal rate of growth of 2.0% and estimated inflation of 2.0% are used to test for possible impairment. This model is based on projected prices for the products, based on the OECD-FAO Agricultural Outlook 2021-2030 report. The model makes use of current cost levels, adapted to take into account growth. The model also estimates a total anchoveta quota in the terminal element in Central/North Peru of 4.5 million tonnes and 0.20 million tonnes in South Peru – totaling 4.70 million tonnes, and in line with the average catch volumes the past 15 years (ref. graph). Austral's impairment tests did not produce grounds for writedown of goodwill or intangible assets with an indefinite useful life in 2021 and 2020. With the implemented WACC and best estimate for the terminal element, the tests show that this value is also intact in the face of reasonable changes in price attainment for fishmeal and -oil. The critical price in the terminal element for fishmeal is USD 1,435. For comparison, the average price of fishmeal FOB Peru was USD 1,493 in 2021 and USD 1,369 in 2020 (source: SUNAT).


FC is a fully-integrated fishing company involved in catches, processing and sales. FC has fishing rights for horse mackerel, mackerel, squid, sardines and anchoveta in Chile. In 2021 the company had 8.6% of the quota for horse mackerel that applies to the fleet group in Chile to which the company's vessels belong. FC supplies frozen products and canned products for consumers, and fishmeal and fish oil. FC's business is reliant on fish caught in the wild. The company would not be able sustain the long-term values generated by its licences without sustainable management of resources. Moreover, natural weather phenomena will have an impact on conditions at sea and may cause periodic, short-term fluctuations in biomass and, as a result, quota sizes from year to year. The stock of horse mackerel in the southern Pacific has been subject to significant harvesting over the past decade, and a common fish stock management scheme was not implemented until 2011. Fish stock management is now provided by the South Pacific Regional Fisheries Management Organisation (SPRFMO). Their work involves measurements and estimates of stock sizes that in turn provide the basis for specification of total quotas from year to year. Total quotas (TAC) were set for the first time in 2012, and at extremely low levels historically. In order to ensure the development of biomass, quotas in the following years have only had a slight increase. The conservative management meant that SPRFMO, in the autumn of 2017, could report that the biomass had reached a sustainable level and could therefore recommend a
growth of 17% in the quota for 2018. The growth in quota for both 2020 and 2021 were 15%. For 2022 the growth in quota is also 15%.
Cash flows after tax and an equivalent discount rate (WACC) after tax of 8.4%, nominal rate of growth of 2.0% and estimated inflation of 2.0% are used to test for possible impairment. This model is based on projected prices for the products, based on the OECD-FAO Agricultural Outlook 2021-2030 report. The model makes use of current cost levels, adapted to take into account growth. The figure for volume of raw materials applied in the model is based on SPRFMO's models. After that, a gradual increase has been added. The critical total quota for Chile on horse mackerel in the terminal element is estimated at 774,000 tonnes. FC's impairment tests did not produce grounds for write-down of intangible assets with an indefinite useful life in 2021.

| Plant, equipment | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 | Land | Projects in progress |
Buildings/ real estate |
and other fixtures |
Vessels | Total |
| At 01.01. | ||||||
| Acquisition cost | 425 | 497 | 4,822 | 9,154 | 4,776 | 19,674 |
| Accumulated depreciation and amortisation | 0 | -7 | -1,249 | -4,671 | -2,496 | -8,424 |
| Accumulated impairment | -18 | 0 | -51 | -15 | -213 | -296 |
| Carrying amount at 01.01. | 407 | 490 | 3,521 | 4,468 | 2,068 | 10,954 |
| Currency translation differences | -7 | -13 | -17 | -15 | -45 | -97 |
| Reclassification | 3 | -515 | 740 | -1,163 | 935 | 0 |
| Additions | 24 | 435 | 257 | 762 | 624 | 2,102 |
| Disposals | -1 | 0 | -3 | -18 | -9 | -31 |
| Depreciation and amortisation | 0 | 0 | -347 | -712 | -410 | -1,469 |
| Acc. depreciation on disposals | 0 | 0 | 10 | 7 | 3 | 20 |
| Reclassification of divested business | 0 | 6 | -6 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Impairment | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Reversal of impairment | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Reversal of impairment in connection with sale/demerger | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 |
| Carrying amount at 31.12. | 426 | 403 | 4,156 | 3,329 | 3,170 | 11,485 |
| 2020 | Land | Projects in progress |
Buildings/ real estate |
Plant, equipment and other fixtures |
Vessels | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| At 31.12. | ||||||
| Acquisition cost | 443 | 404 | 5,784 | 8,596 | 6,130 | 21,356 |
| Accumulated depreciation and amortisation | 0 | -1 | -1,579 | -5,252 | -2,754 | -9,585 |
| Accumulated impairment | -16 | 0 | -48 | -15 | -207 | -286 |
| Carrying amount at 31.12. | 426 | 403 | 4,155 | 3,329 | 3,170 | 11,485 |
| Carrying amount of right-of-use assets included above | 0 | 0 | 629 | 1,411 | 1,066 | 3,106 |
| Depreciation of right-of-use assets included above | 0 | 0 | 62 | 290 | 189 | 542 |
| 2021 | Land | Projects in progress |
Buildings/ real estate |
Plant, equipment and other fixtures |
Vessels | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Carrying amount at 01.01. | 426 | 403 | 4,155 | 3,329 | 3,170 | 11,485 |
| Currency translation differences | -6 | -5 | -29 | -33 | -8 | -81 |
| Reclassification | 0 | -228 | 74 | 225 | 57 | 128 |
| Acquisitions through business combinations | 59 | 1 | 107 | 121 | 0 | 287 |
| Additions | 78 | 591 | 239 | 627 | 869 | 2,403 |
| Disposals | -8 | 0 | -109 | -55 | -115 | -287 |
| Depreciation and amortisation | 0 | 0 | -362 | -733 | -433 | -1,529 |
| Acc. depreciation on disposals | 0 | 0 | 57 | 45 | 7 | 109 |
| Reclassification of divested business | 0 | 0 | -20 | -139 | 0 | -159 |
| Impairment | -6 | 0 | 0 | -6 | 0 | -13 |
| Reversal of impairment | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Reversal of impairment in connection with sale/demerger | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Carrying amount at 31.12. | 542 | 761 | 4,112 | 3,380 | 3,547 | 12,344 |
| Projects in | Buildings/ | Plant, equipment | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | Land | progress | real estate | and other fixtures | Vessels | Total |
| At 31.12. | ||||||
| Acquisition cost | 564 | 762 | 6,059 | 9,414 | 6,893 | 23,692 |
| Accumulated depreciation and amortisation | 0 | -1 | -1,899 | -6,014 | -3,138 | -11,050 |
| Accumulated impairment | -22 | 0 | -47 | -21 | -208 | -297 |
| Carrying amount at 31.12. | 542 | 761 | 4,113 | 3,380 | 3,547 | 12,344 |
| Right-of-use assets included above | 0 | 0 | 516 | 1,385 | 1,162 | 3,064 |
| Depreciation of right-of-use assets included above | 0 | 0 | 63 | 290 | 213 | 566 |
The Group's activities expose it to a variety of financial risks: market risk (including currency risk, cash flow and fair value interest rate risk and price risk), credit risk, liquidity risk and cash flow interest rate risk. The Group' focuses on the unpredictability of financial markets and seeks to minimise potential adverse effects on the Group's financial performance. The Group uses to some degree derivative financial instruments to reduce certain risk exposures.
The Group operates internationally and is exposed to foreign exchange risk arising from various currency exposures, primarily with respect to the USD, EUR, CLP and PEN. Foreign exchange risk arises from future commercial transactions, recognised assets and liabilities and net investments in foreign operations.
To manage their foreign exchange risk arising, entities in the Group use forward contracts in addition to withdrawals and deposits on multicurrency accounts.
Changes in exchange rates that affects accounts receivable, other receivables, and liabilities nominated in other currencies than the entities functional currency will have a direct effect on the Groups income statement as per year end.
At 31.12.2021, if NOK had weakened/strengthened by 10% against the USD with all other variables held constant, before-tax profit for the year would have been MNOK 13 higher/lower. The sensitivity is calculated based on foreign exchange gains/losses on translation of USD denominated trade receivables and other receivables, trade payables, cash in bank and interest bearing debt.
At 31.12.2021, if NOK had weakened/strengthened by 10% against the EUR with all other variables held constant, before-tax profit for the year would have been MNOK 71 higher/lower. The sensitivity is calculated based on foreign exchange gains/losses on translation of EUR denominated trade receivables and other receivables, trade payables, cash in bank and interest bearing debt.
Corresponding changes in exchange rates at year end of other currencies are not considered to have any material effect on the post-tax profit for the Group.
Through the subsidiary LSG, the Group has a substantial exposure to the price risk of the fluctuating marked prices on salmon, trout and whitefish. To reduce this risk, LSG aims to have a certain part of the sales on fixed price contracts.
The Group is also exposed to changes in the prices of other products sold, mainly fishmeal, fish oil and human consumption products. Local management reviews before selling whether price levels are consistent with the target profitability. The group is also exposed to changes in prices of pelagic raw material purchase. Price risk identified here is not hedged by any derivative financial instruments.
The Group's interest rate risk arises from long-term borrowings. Borrowings issued at variable rates expose the Group to cash flow interest rate risk. Borrowings issued at fixed rates expose the Group to fair value interest rate risk.
The Group search to reduce interest rate risk by using interest rate swaps (floating-to-fixed) for part of the borrowings. Such interest rate swaps have the economic effect of converting borrowings from floating rates to fixed rates.
As at 31.12.2021, the Group has a total unrealised profit of MNOK 25 (after tax) attached to interest rate swaps.
If the interest rate level had been 0.5% higher (lower) throughout the year, all other variables held constant, profit before income taxes would have decreased (increased) by MNOK 14 in 2021 and MNOK 15 in 2020 through the impact of floating rate borrowings and deposits. The sensitivity analysis is based on the level of net interest bearing debt (NIBD) by year end 2021 and 2020, allowed for entered interest rate swaps.
| Amounts in MNOK | Increase/reduction in interest points | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Impact on profit before tax | -/+ 50 | -/+ 14 | -/+ 15 |
Credit risk occurs in transactions involving derivatives, deposits with banks and financial institutions in addition to transactions with wholesalers and customers, including outstanding receivables and fixed agreements. As virtually all the Group's sales to end customers are credit sales, procedures have been established to ensure that the Group companies only sell products to customers with satisfactory credit rating. A credit assessment is performed based on the customer's financial position, history and any other factors of relevance. Individual limits are set for risk exposure, based on internal and external assessments of creditworthiness and guidelines from the Board of Directors. The Group's compliance on these procedures is regularly monitored. For the business in Europe, almost all of the Group's trade receivables are covered by credit insurance securing about 90% of nominal amounts. For the business in South America, credit and prepayment are largely used. The counterparties to derivative contracts and financial placements may only be financial institutions with a high credit rating and other parties who can provide reliable security. See note on receivables for further information on credit risk.
Prudent liquidity risk management implies maintaining sufficient cash and marketable securities, the availability of funding through an adequate amount of committed credit facilities and the ability to close out market positions. Due to the dynamic nature of the underlying businesses, the Group aims to maintain flexibility in funding by keeping committed credit lines available.
Management monitors rolling forecasts of the Group's liquidity reserve (comprises undrawn borrowing facility and cash and cash equivalents) on the basis of expected cash flow. This is generally carried out at local level in the operating companies of the Group.
The table below specifies the Group's financial covenants that are not derivatives, classified in relation to downpayment schedule. The figures in the table are non-discounted contractual cash flows, in other words instalments and estimated interest during the contractual period are assigned to loan debt.
| Less than | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 31.12.2021 | 1 year | 1-2 years | 3-5 years | Over 5 years |
| Loan debt | 1,505 | 2,368 | 1,972 | 3,010 |
| Lease liability for right-of-use assets to credit institutions | 290 | 641 | 271 | 160 |
| Lease liability for right-of-use assets other than to credit institutions | 557 | 877 | 703 | 1,081 |
| Trade payables and other liabilities (excl. statutory liabilities) | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Less than | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 31.12.2020 | 1 year | 1-2 years | 3-5 years | Over 5 years |
| Loan debt | 2,272 | 2,387 | 1,444 | 2,410 |
| Lease liability for right-of-use assets to credit institutions | 302 | 565 | 390 | 210 |
| Lease liability for right-of-use assets other than to credit institutions | 282 | 523 | 301 | 393 |
| Trade payables and other liabilities (excl. statutory liabilities) | 2,328 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
The Groups objectives when managing capital are to safeguard the Groups ability to continue as a going concern in order to provide returns for shareholders and benefits for other stakeholders and to maintain an optimal capital structure to reduce the cost of capital.
In order to maintain or adjust the capital structure, the Group may adjust the amount of dividends paid to shareholders, return capital to shareholders, issue new shares or sell assets to reduce debt. For further information on the dividend policy, see note 5.
The Group monitors capital on the basis of the gearing ratio. This ratio is calculated as net interest bearing debt divided by capital employed. Net interest bearing debt is calculated as total borrowings (including 'current and non-current borrowings' as shown in the consolidated statement of financial position) less interest bearing assets and cash and cash equivalents. Total capital is calculated as 'equity' as shown in the statement of financial position plus net debt. The gearing ratios at 31.12.2021 and 31.12.2020 were as follows:
| Amounts in MNOK | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|
| Total loans (note 17) | 9,298 | 9,113 |
| Minus liquid assets | 5,329 | 4,463 |
| Minus other interest-bearing assets | 0 | 0 |
| Net interest-bearing debt (cf. note 28) | 3,970 | 4,650 |
| Total equity | 25,187 | 22,991 |
| Total assets | 29,157 | 27,640 |
| Debt–equity ratio | 14% | 17% |
The fair value of financial instruments traded in active markets (such as trading and available-for-sale securities) is based on quoted market prices at the balance sheet date. The quoted market price used for financial assets held by the Group is the current bid price. None of the shares categorized as available for sale are traded in active markets.
The fair value of financial instruments that are not traded in an active market (for example, over-the-counter derivatives) is determined by the use of valuation techniques. The Group uses a variety of methods and makes assumptions that are based on market conditions existing at each balance sheet date. Other techniques, such as estimated discounted cash flows, are also used in certain cases. The fair value of forward foreign exchange contracts is determined using quoted forward exchange rates at the balance sheet date.
The carrying value less impairment provision of trade receivables and payables are assumed to approximate their fair values. The fair value of financial liabilities for disclosure purposes is estimated by discounting the future contractual cash flows at the current market interest rate that is available to the Group for similar financial instruments.
| 31.12.2021 | Fair value through | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Assets | Amortised cost |
Fair value through profit and loss |
other comprehensive income |
Total | ||
| Investment in shares | 0 | 47 | 0 | 47 | ||
| Derivatives (interest rate swaps) | 0 | 0 | 12 | 12 | ||
| Trade receivables and other receivables excl. prepayments * | 2,933 | 0 | 0 | 2,933 | ||
| Financial assets at fair value through profit or loss | 0 | 58 | 0 | 58 | ||
| Liquid assets | 5,329 | 0 | 0 | 5,329 | ||
| Total | 8,262 | 105 | 12 | 8,379 |
* Prepayments are excluded from the receivables line in the statement of financial position, as this analysis is only required for financial instruments.
| 31.12.2021 | Fair value through | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Liabilities | Amortised cost |
Fair value through profit and loss |
other comprehensive income |
Total |
| Loans excl. lease liabilities to credit institutions | 8,008 | 0 | 0 | 8,008 |
| Lease liabilities to credit institutions | 1,290 | 0 | 0 | 1,290 |
| Lease liabilities other than to credit institutions | 1,660 | 0 | 0 | 1,660 |
| Derivatives (interest rate swaps) | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Trade payables and other liabilities, excl. statutory liabilities | 2,985 | 0 | 0 | 2,985 |
| Total | 13,944 | 0 | 1 | 13,944 |
| 31.12.2020 | Fair value through | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Assets | Amortised cost |
Fair value through profit and loss |
other comprehensive income |
Total |
| Investment in shares | 0 | 42 | 0 | 42 |
| Derivatives (interest rate swaps) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Trade receivables and other receivables excl. prepayments * | 2,688 | 0 | 0 | 2,688 |
| Financial assets at fair value through profit or loss | 0 | 111 | 0 | 111 |
| Liquid assets | 4,463 | 0 | 0 | 4,463 |
| Total | 7,150 | 152 | 0 | 7,303 |
* Prepayments are excluded from the receivables line in the statement of financial position, as this analysis is only required for financial instruments.
| 31.12.2020 | Fair value through | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Liabilities | Amortised cost |
Fair value through profit and loss |
other comprehensive income |
Total | |
| Loans excl. lease liabilities to credit institutions | 7,749 | 0 | 0 | 7,749 | |
| Lease liabilities to credit institutions | 1,364 | 0 | 0 | 1,364 | |
| Lease liabilities other than to credit institutions | 1,292 | 0 | 0 | 1,292 | |
| Derivatives (interest rate swaps) | 0 | 0 | 48 | 48 | |
| Trade payables and other liabilities, excl. statutory liabilities | 2,329 | 0 | 18 | 2,347 | |
| Total | 12,733 | 0 | 66 | 12,799 |
The table below analyses financial instruments carried at fair value, by valuation method. The different levels have been defined as follows:
(that is, as prices) or indirectly (that is, derived from prices) (level 2)
Level 3: Inputs for the asset or liability that are not based on observable market data (that is, unobservable inputs) (level 3)
The following table presents the Group's financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value at 31.12.2021.
| Assets measured at fair value through profit and loss | Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Financial assets available for sale | |||
| – Investment in shares | 0 | 0 | 47 |
| Derivatives used for hedging | |||
| – Fair value hedging – fair value through P&L | 0 | 58 | 0 |
| – Cash flow hedging – fair value through OCI | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total assets | 0 | 58 | 47 |
| Liabilities measured at fair value through profit and loss | Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Derivatives used for hedging | |||
| – Fair value hedging – fair value through P&L | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| – Cash flow hedging – fair value through OCI | 0 | 1 | 0 |
| Total liabilities | 0 | 1 | 0 |
The following table presents the Group's financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value at 31.12.2020.
| Assets measured at fair value through profit and loss | Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Financial assets available for sale | |||
| – Investment in shares | 0 | 0 | 42 |
| Derivatives used for hedging | |||
| – Fair value hedging – fair value through P&L | 0 | 111 | 0 |
| – Cash flow hedging – fair value through OCI | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total assets | 0 | 111 | 42 |
| Liabilities measured at fair value through profit and loss | Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 |
| Derivatives used for hedging | |||
| – Fair value hedging – fair value through P&L | 0 | 0 | 0 |
– Cash flow hedging – fair value through OCI 0 66 0 Total liabilities 0 66 0
There were no transfers between level 1 and 2 during the year.
The fair value of financial instruments traded in active markets is based on quoted market prices at the balance sheet date. A market is regarded as active if quoted prices are readily and regularly available from an exchange, dealer, broker, industry group, pricing service, or regulatory agency, and those prices represent actual and regularly occurring market transactions on an arm's length basis. The quoted market price used for financial assets held by the group is the current bid price.
The fair value of financial instruments that are not traded in an active market (for example, over-the-counter derivatives) is determined by using valuation techniques. These valuation techniques maximise the use of observable market data where it is available and rely as little as possible on entity specific estimates. If all significant inputs required to fair value an instrument are observable, the instrument is included in level 2.
If one or more of the significant inputs is not based on observable market data, the instrument is included in Level 3.
Specific valuation techniques used to value financial instruments include:
Other long-term receivables, trade receivables and other shortterm receivables are measured at level 3.
The value of the Norwegian krone is one of many parameters that have an effect on the Group's competitiveness. The Group has at all times a substantial biomass in the sea that represents future sales. A significant share of the Group's revenue is generated in currencies other than NOK. Revenue by currency is presented in the note on operating segments, and trade receivables by currency is presented in the note on receivables.
In order to minimise the currency risk the Group uses currency forward contracts to hedge both net receivables and signed sales contracts in foreign currency. Thus the Group recognises the currency forward contracts as fair value hedging, also for the signed sales contracts, which are off-balance items.
At 31.12.2021 the Group has currency forward contracts with a net positive fair value of NOK 61.5 million (NOK 110.6 million in 2020). The currency forward contracts are classified as other current receivables at 31.12.2021. NOK 0.6 million (NOK 72.3 million in 2020) of the net positive value is offset against the off-balance item signed sales contracts, and is classified as current debt.
The net currency loss in 2021 is NOK 44 million (NOK 122 million in 2020), which is recognised in cost of materials in the income statement, as it relates to the inventory cycle.
› Contract from 2012: MNOK 500, start date on time of contract, duration 10 years, closing date 16.01.2022, interest 3.29%, LSG
The fair value of the swap agreements has been estimated using market inputs per 31st of December. As at 31.12.2021, a total unrealised profit of MNOK 25 was included in equity.
| Interest rate swaps | Nominal value | Interest rate/ average interest rate |
Gross liability recognised |
Corresponding deferred tax |
Equity impact |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fair value at 31.12.2020 | 1,722 | 2.59% | 24 | 5 | -19 |
| Fair value adjustment 31.12.2021 | 1,184 | 2.22% | -57 | -12 | 44 |
| Fair value at 31.12.2021 | -33 | -7 | 25 |
Fair value of the interest rate swaps (gross liability) is recognised as "other long-term liabilities". The effective part of the fair value adjustment is recognised in other comprehensive income (cash flow hedge). The deferred tax effect is also recognised in other comprehensive income, and is thus not part of current tax income in profit and loss.
| 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|
| Guarantee provided by subsidiary | 534 | 519 |
| Guarantee extended to joint venture and associates | 0 | 0 |
| Guarantee extended to other company | 9 | 9 |
| Total | 543 | 528 |
The guarantees provided by subsidiaries includes tax deductions issued, guarantees for Norges Råfisklag and other external suppliers.
| 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|
| Restricted deposits related to employee tax deduction | 157 | 111 |
| Other restricted deposits | 31 | 67 |
| Total | 188 | 178 |
In February 2022 Russia attacked Ukraine in an escalation of the ongoing conflict that started in 2014. The war has a number of indirect and direct consequences for the Group. The direct consequences are that the Group's sales to Belarus have been halted, and sales to Ukraine are not possible. Sales to Belarus and Ukraine in 2021 amounted to approx. NOK 316 million and NOK 493 million respectively. The Group has no outstanding receivables in Belarus and its exposure to Ukraine is less than NOK 5 million. The Group's joint venture, Pelagia Holding AS, had sales to Ukraine of approx. NOK 77 million, with total sales to the region comprising Ukraine, Belarus, Moldova and Georgia representing approx. 3% of the joint venture's revenue in 2021.
There are many indirect consequences, with the most important likely to be the increased price of input factors for the Group's production, including fuel and raw materials for feed.
As of 31.12.2021, the Company has 202,717,374 shares at nominal value of NOK 0.50 per share, of which 893,300 treasury shares.
| Date of registration | Type of change | Nominal value per share (NOK) |
Total share capital | No. of ordinary shares |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 01.01.2008/30.09.2009 | Capital increase | 0.50 | 101,358,687 | 202,717,374 |
| 2010 - 2021 31.12.2021 |
No changes | 0.50 | 101,358,687 | 202,717,374 |
| 2021 | 2020 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overview of shareholders at 31.12. | No. of shares | Share holding | No. of shares | Share holding | |
| Laco AS | 112,605,876 | 55.55% | 112,605,876 | 55.55% | |
| State Street Bank and Trust Comp A/C Client Fund Number: OM80 | 7,375,219 | 3.64% | 6,594,450 | 3.25% | |
| State Street Bank and Trust Comp A/C Client Omnibus F, Ref: OM06 | 4,505,171 | 2.22% | 5,099,287 | 2.52% | |
| J.P. Morgan SE, Luxembourg Branch | 4,370,989 | 2.16% | 0 | 0.00% | |
| Folketrygdfondet | 2,980,544 | 1.47% | 3,120,241 | 1.54% | |
| SIX SIS AG | 2,665,170 | 1.31% | 2,904,861 | 1.43% | |
| OM Holding AS | 2,411,308 | 1.19% | 1,701,661 | 0.84% | |
| Pareto Aksje Norge Verdipapirfond | 2,092,555 | 1.03% | 2,110,655 | 1.04% | |
| The Bank of New York Mellon SA/NV | 1,708,419 | 0.84% | 1,516,304 | 0.75% | |
| JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., London | 1,618,572 | 0.80% | 0 | 0.00% | |
| The Northern Trust Comp, London Br | 1,428,566 | 0.70% | 0 | 0.00% | |
| State Street Bank and Trust Comp A/C West Non-Treaty Account | 1,355,913 | 0.67% | 1,159,530 | 0.57% | |
| J.P. Morgan SE, Luxembourg Branch | 1,269,384 | 0.63% | 0 | 0.00% | |
| Danske Invest Norske Instit. II. | 1,168,163 | 0.58% | 1,500,363 | 0.74% | |
| J.P. Morgan SE, Luxembourg Branch | 1,149,991 | 0.57% | 0 | 0.00% | |
| Verdipapirfondet Alfred Berg Norge | 1,128,015 | 0.56% | 784,827 | 0.39% | |
| Clearstream Banking S.A. | 1,077,941 | 0.53% | 1,381,630 | 0.68% | |
| Pareto Invest AS | 953,500 | 0.47% | 744,169 | 0.37% | |
| Storebrand Norge i Verdipapirfond | 946,750 | 0.47% | 980,223 | 0.48% | |
| State Street Bank and Trust Comp A/C Client Omnibus F, Ref: OM01 | 894,320 | 0.44% | 1,008,450 | 0.50% | |
| Austevoll Seafood ASA | 893,300 | 0.44% | 893,300 | 0.44% | |
| J.P. Morgan Bank Luxembourg S.A. | 0 | 0.00% | 4,878,741 | 2.41% | |
| Mitsui and Co., Ltd | 0 | 0.00% | 1,782,236 | 0.88% | |
| JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., London | 0 | 0.00% | 1,496,849 | 0.74% | |
| Verdipapirfondet Nordea Kapital | 0 | 0.00% | 796,636 | 0.39% | |
| Total, 20 largest shareholders | 154,599,666 | 76.26% | 153,060,289 | 75.50% | |
| Other shareholders | 48,117,708 | 23.74% | 49,657,085 | 24.50% | |
| Total, all shareholders | 202,717,374 | 100.00% | 202,717,374 | 100.00% |
Helge Singelstad owns 50,000 shares in the company. Helge Møgster owns shares indirectly through Laco AS. Lill Maren Møgster owns shares indirectly through Laco AS. Eirik Drønen Melingen owns shares indirectly through Laco AS.
Arne Møgster owns shares indirectly through Laco AS. Britt Kathrine Drivenes owns, through Lerkehaug AS, 50,367 shares in the company.
| Non-current liabilities | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|
| Mortgages | 4,674 | 5,145 |
| Bond loans | 1,990 | 507 |
| Other loans | 30 | 25 |
| Lease liabilities to credit institutions | 1,025 | 1,093 |
| Lease liabilities other than to credit institutions | ||
| Total non-current liabilities | 7,718 | 6,770 |
| Current liabilities | 2021 | 2020 |
| Overdraft facility | 583 | 1,050 |
| Mortgages | 732 | 523 |
| Bond loans | - | 500 |
| Lease liabilities to credit institutions | 265 | 271 |
| Total current liabilities | 1,580 | 2,343 |
| Total non-current and current liabilities | 9,298 | 9,113 |
| Net interest-bearing debt | ||
| Liquid assets | 5,329 | 4,463 |
| Other interest-bearing assets – non-current | 0 | 0 |
| Total net interest-bearing debt (cf. note 28) | 3,970 | 4,650 |
| Long term lease liabilities other than to credit institutions | 1,382 | 1056 |
| Short term lease liabilities other than to credit institutions | 277 | 235 |
| Lease liabilities other than to credit institutions | 1,660 | 1,292 |
| Total non-current and current liabilities | 10,958 | 10,404 |
| Liquid assets | -5,329 | -4,463 |
| Net interest bearing debt incl. lease liabilities other than to credit institutions | 5,630 | 5,942 |
| Repayment profile for interest-bearing debt | 2022* | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 Subsequent | Total* | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mortgages * | 732 | 518 | 1,039 | 837 | 434 | 1,846 | 5,406 |
| Overdraft facility | 583 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 583 |
| Bond loans | 0 | 490 | 7 | 0 | 498 | 995 | 1,990 |
| Lease liabilities to credit institutions | 265 | 314 | 296 | 164 | 95 | 155 | 1,289 |
| Other non-current liabilities | 0 | 5 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 18 | 30 |
| Total | 1,581 | 1,328 | 1,348 | 1,002 | 1,027 | 3,014 | 9,298 |
| Total | 1,858 | 1,572 | 1,546 | 1,193 | 1,201 | 3,589 | 10,958 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total | 277 | 244 | 198 | 192 | 174 | 575 | 1,660 |
| Lease liabilities other than to credit institutions | 277 | 244 | 198 | 192 | 174 | 575 | 1,660 |
| Repayment profile for long-term non-interest-bearing debt |
* Repayments of non-current liabilities which mature in 2022 are classified as current liabilities in the balance sheet.
| Liabilities secured by mortgage | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|
| Current liabilities | 745 | 1,188 |
| Non-current liabilities | 6,013 | 6,744 |
| Liabilities to credit institutions incl. finance lease agreements | 6,758 | 7,932 |
| Assets provided as security | ||
| Operating assets | 6,000 | 6,882 |
| Licences * | 1,643 | 1,462 |
| Inventories | 845 | 616 |
| Biological assets | 6,137 | 5,019 |
| Shares | 1,380 | 884 |
| Trade receivables | 1,360 | 1,501 |
| Right-of-use assets leased from credit institutions | 1,070 | 1,830 |
| Total assets provided as security | 18,435 | 18,193 |
* Licence value ex. price purchase allocation.
AUSS has pledged as security the shares in BRBI and BFARM for the bank loans of AUSS of MNOK 84.5. Assets owned by LSG, BRBI and BFARM are also placed as security directly to their separate and individual loans, and are included in the figures presented above.
| The Group is exposed to interest rate changes on the loans, based on the following repricing structure | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|
| 6 months or less | 2,293 | 2,397 |
| 6-12 months | 0 | 525 |
| 1-5 years | 0 | 698 |
| Over 5 years | 1,182 | 728 |
| Total | 3,474 | 4,348 |
| The carrying amount and fair value of the long-term loans | Carrying amount | Fair value | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| are as follows | 2021 | 2020 | 2021 | 2020 |
| Mortgages | 4,674 | 5,145 | 4,641 | 5,193 |
| Bond loans | 1,990 | 507 | 1,995 | 502 |
| Lease liabilities to credit institutions | 1,025 | 1,093 | 1,025 | 1,093 |
| Lease liabilities other than to credit institutions | 0 | 1,056 | 0 | 1,056 |
| Other non-current liabilities | 30 | 25 | 30 | 25 |
| Total | 7,718 | 7,826 | 7,691 | 7,869 |
Based on contractual terms the fair value of non-current borrowings (excl. bond loan) are estimated to be equal to book value as of 31.12.2021, adjusted for fair value of interest rate swaps.
Three of the new bonds established in 2021 are so called green bonds. This implies that the group have established a green financing framework which covers how the proceeds from the bond loans can be used.
The bond loans are listed on Oslo Stock Exchange, and fair value is calculated using the last traded rates in 2021 for the bonds. The carrying amounts of short-term borrowings approximate their fair value. Next repayment of bond loan is in June 2023.
| The carrying amounts of the Group's loans are denominated in the following currencies | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|
| NOK | 8,018 | 7,894 |
| SEK | 109 | 127 |
| DKK | 137 | 0 |
| USD | 766 | 780 |
| GBP | 0 | 0 |
| EUR | 258 | 246 |
| Other currencies | 11 | 66 |
| Total | 9,298 | 9,113 |
There are several financial covenant requirements for the companies in the Group. The Group has not been in breach of any covenants during the financial year 2021, and is not in breach as of 31.12.2021.
| Overdraft facility | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|
| Overdraft facility | 583 | 1,050 |
| Unutilised overdraft facility | 3,681 | 3,268 |
| Limit of overdraft facility | 4,263 | 4,318 |
| Unutilised long term credit facility | 1,875 | 1,566 |
The following tables sets out an analysis of net debt and the movements in net debt for 2021 and 2020.
| Net interest-bearing debt | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|
| Cash and cash equivalents | 5,329 | 4,463 |
| Current liabilities | -1,580 | -2,343 |
| Non-current liabilities | -7,718 | -6,770 |
| Net interest-bearing debt (cf. note 28) | -3,970 | -4,650 |
| Cash and liquid investments | 5,329 | 4,463 |
| Gross debt – fixed interest rates | -1,184 | -1,722 |
| Gross debt – variable interest rates | -8,114 | -7,391 |
| Net interest-bearing debt (cf. note 28) | -3,970 | -4,650 |
| Other assets | Current liabilities | Non-current liabilities incl. first year's repayments |
||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cash and bank |
Liquid investments |
Bank overdraft |
Factoring liabilities |
Bank loans |
Lease liabilities, credit institutions |
Other liabilities |
Total | |
| Net debt at 01.01.2020 | 4,251 | 0 | -824 | -16 | -6,209 | -1,246 | -29 | -4,073 |
| Change in bank deposits | 236 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 236 |
| Cash flow | 0 | 0 | -357 | 0 | -79 | 339 | 0 | -97 |
| Addition of leases from credit institutions and lease incentives |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | -22 | 0 | -22 |
| Currency translation differences | -24 | 0 | 132 | 16 | -464 | 130 | 0 | -210 |
| Other non-cash movements | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 80 | -565 | 0 | -484 |
| Net debt at 31.12.2020 | 4,463 | 0 | -1,049 | 0 | -6,672 | -1,364 | -29 | -4,650 |
| Change in bank deposits | 862 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 862 |
| Cash flow | 0 | 0 | 410 | 0 | -885 | -891 | 0 | -1,366 |
| Addition of leases from credit institutions and lease incentives |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 966 | 0 | 966 |
| Currency translation differences | 8 | 0 | -1 | 0 | -23 | 0 | 0 | -16 |
| Other non-cash movements | -4 | 0 | 56 | 0 | 184 | -1 | -1 | 234 |
| Net debt at 31.12.2021 | 5,329 | 0 | -583 | 0 | -7,396 | -1,290 | -30 | -3,970 |
The Group has recognised a provision related to the acquisition of Cormar in 2007. The Group will have reimbursement rights for some of the liabilities, if the liabilities materialises. A provision of MNOK 18 has been recorded for this contingent liability, ref note 22.
The subsidiary Austral (Peru) has certain court actions pending resolution for a total of MNOK 71 as of 31.12.2021 mainly related to its business activities. It is considered unlikely that the prosecutor will succeed with the claims in full. Based on specific assessments of each case, a provision of MNOK 12 relating to these suits, which is considered to be the best estimate.
| 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|
| Other interest income | 39 | 46 |
| Foreign exchange gains (realised and unrealised) | 351 | 235 |
| Other financial income | 5 | 9 |
| Total financial income | 394 | 290 |
| Interest expense | 238 | 260 |
| Interest expense on lease liabilities to credit institutions | 29 | 33 |
| Interest expense on lease liabilities to others | 55 | 48 |
| Foreign exchange losses (realised and unrealised) | 395 | 357 |
| Other financial expenses | 27 | 19 |
| Total financial expenses | 744 | 717 |
| Net financial expenses | -350 | -427 |
| 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|
| Salaries and holiday pay | 3,070 | 2,782 |
| Contract labour | 258 | 222 |
| Other remuneration | 135 | 92 |
| National insurance contributions | 256 | 240 |
| Pension costs (incl. national insurance contribution) | 154 | 121 |
| Remuneration to board members | 2 | 2 |
| Other payments | 189 | 146 |
| Total wages and salaries | 4,064 | 3,605 |
| No. of full-time equivalents | 7,143 | 6,342 |
The Norwegian companies in the Group satisfy the requirements in the Act relating to mandatory occupational pensions (Norwegian: OTP).
The schemes are in the main established as defined contribution pension schemes, with external life insurance companies.
Some few of the subsidiaries have Contractual Early Retirement schemes (Norwegian: AFP) for their employees. The new AFP scheme which came into effect on 1st of January 2011, is to be considered as a defined contribution scheme until reliable and sufficient information has been provided so that the Group can book its proportionate share of the pension cost, pension liability and pension funds in the scheme. However, a provision has been carried to cover the estimated payments related to undercoverage in the former AFP scheme.
Moreover, a limited part of the Group companies have defined benefit schemes with life insurance companies, with pension funds placed in a portfolio of investments by insurance companies. The insurance company administers all transactions related to the pension scheme. Estimated return on pension funds is based on marked prices on balance sheet date and projected development during the period in which the pension scheme is valid. The calculation of pension liabilities is based on assumptions in line with the recommendations of Norsk Regnskapsstiftelse (NRS) per 31.12.2021. Change in the benefit obligations as a result of actuarial gains and losses are booked as comprehensive income.
| Pension costs | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|
| Pension costs, defined contribution plan | 131 | 95 |
| National insurance contributions, defined contribution plan | 18 | 10 |
| Net pension costs, defined contribution plan | 149 | 105 |
| Net pension costs, defined benefit plan | 6 | 16 |
| Total pension costs | 154 | 121 |
| Pension liabilities and other liabilities | ||
| Pension liabilities | 8 | 8 |
| Fair value of interest rate swaps (cf. note 12) | -33 | 48 |
| Other liabilities | 36 | -14 |
| Total | 11 | 43 |
The main principles of the remuneration policy to executive management are based on the policy that the members of executive management shall have a competitive pay program, with respect to salary, bonuses, pensions and other remuneration. AUSS shall offer a total remuneration to its executive management that is on level with comparable companies. However, the Company's need for well qualified personnel should always be considered.
For further information see the declaration from the Board of Directors on salaries and other remuneration to executive personnel submitted at the Ordinary General Meeting 27th of May 2021.
Remuneration to executives and members of the parent Company's Board are reported exclusive employer's contribution and in amounts TNOK and were:
| 2021 – Remuneration to senior executives | Chairman of | Other board | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (amounts in NOK 1,000) | CEO | CFO | the Board * | members | Total |
| Salary | 3,543 | 2,733 | 0 | 0 | 6,276 |
| Bonus payment based on results for 2020 | 3,200 | 1,000 | 0 | 0 | 4,200 |
| Pension costs | 134 | 123 | 257 | ||
| Other remuneration | 165 | 166 | 0 | 331 | |
| Board fee/other remuneration | 0 | 0 | 3,406 | 1,852 | 5,258 |
| Total | 7,044 | 4,022 | 3,406 | 1,852 | 16,323 |
| 2020 – Remuneration to senior executives (amounts in NOK 1,000) |
CEO | CFO | Chairman of the Board * |
Other board members |
Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Salary | 3,543 | 2,733 | 0 | 0 | 6,276 |
| Bonus payment based on results for 2019 | 3,000 | 1,000 | 0 | 0 | 4,000 |
| Pension costs | 156 | 163 | 320 | ||
| Other remuneration | 155 | 159 | 0 | 314 | |
| Board fee/other remuneration | 0 | 0 | 3,726 | 2,287 | 6,014 |
| Total | 6,854 | 4,055 | 3,726 | 2,287 | 16,923 |
* The annual Directors' Fee to the Chairman of the Board is not paid as taxable remuneration. AUSS is invoiced for the Chairman's services and for consultancy fees by Group head entity Laco AS, with which company the Chairman is employed. The total amount paid in 2021 and 2020 includes board remuneration of TNOK 375 in 2021 and TNOK 375 in 2020
The Group management takes part in the Groups collective pension schemes.
No loans or securities have been issued in 2021 or 2020 to the CEO, board members, members of the corporate management or other employees or closely related parties.
The CEO has a term of notice of 3 months. On resignation, the CEO has no right to extra compensation. Pension age is 70 years, and the CEO takes part in the defined contribution scheme.
There are as of 31.12.2021, no on-going option program in the Group.
| Specification of auditor's fee | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|
| Statutory audit | 12 | 11 |
| Audit fee, other auditors | 2 | 1 |
| Other certification services | 0 | 1 |
| Technical assistance, taxation | 2 | 3 |
| Other non-audit services | 4 | 3 |
| Total | 21 | 19 |
| 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|
| Gains and losses on sale of land, buildings and equipment | 62 | 11 |
| Other gains and losses | 0 | 0 |
| Total other gains and losses | 62 | 11 |
| Specification of other current liabilities | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|
| Wages, salaries and other staff costs | 474 | 392 |
| Public taxes payable | 397 | 275 |
| Accrued expenses | 380 | 333 |
| Forward exchange contracts/ liability recognised as a result of fair value hedging | 1 | 32 |
| Contingent liabilities from addition of Cormar (cf. note 18) | 18 | 19 |
| Contingent liabilities concerning ongoing legal disputes in Austral (cf. note 18) | 12 | 7 |
| Provisions and contingencies | 50 | 35 |
| Unrealised loss on Fish Pool contracts | 44 | 0 |
| Other current liabilities | 131 | 174 |
| Total other current liabilities | 1,507 | 1,267 |
The Group implemented IFRS 16 Leases from 1st of January 2019. This new standard requires carrying of practically all lease agreements, as operating and financial lease agreements for the lessee are no longer to be differentiated. According to the new standard, the asset (right of use) and the obligation to pay lease are recognised in the financial statements.
The Group has applied the modified, retrospective method for implementation on 1st of January 2019. This implies no changes to historic comparative figures and that the value of the lease liability and the right of use are the same at the time of implementation. The new right-of-use assets and lease liabilities are valued at the current value of the future lease payments. The lease payments are discounted by the Group's estimated marginal average interest rate on loans (4%). This is deemed as representative of all leases in the Group, as the majority are in NOK, and the Group principally makes use of the same credit institutions, which provide relatively similar terms. For leases previously classified as financial leasing according to IAS 17, the carried book value of the right-of-use assets and lease liabilities are retained on the implementation date for IFRS 16 (1st of January 2019).
The right-of-use assets are depreciated on a straight-line basis from the date of commissioning until the end of the useful life of
the right-of-use asset or the end of the lease period, whatever comes first. Any extension options that may, with reasonable certainty, be exercised, are included.
The lease payments are divided into two parts: instalment and interest. The interest on the lease liability in each accounting period of the lease period shall be the amount that provides a constant periodic interest rate for the remaining balance of the lease liability (annuity principle).
In the statement of financial position, the Group has chosen to present the right-of-use assets on a separate line. The lease liabilities are classified as long-term and short-term. In addition, the lease liabilities are divided into (1) lease liabilities to credit institutions and (2) lease liabilities to others. Only the lease liabilities to credit institutions are included in the calculation of the alternative performance measurements for net interest-bearing debt (NIBD). The long-term share of the lease liabilities is shown on separate lines in the statement of financial position. The short-term share of the lease liabilities is included in the first-year instalment on long-term liabilities and shown on a separate line in the statement of financial position. The short-term share of long-term liabilities is specified in more detail in the note on long-term liabilities. The interest expense related to the liability is presented under net financial expense. This is specified in more detail in the note on combined items in the financial statements.
Lease costs that were previously presented as commodities and other operating expenses are now presented in the income statement as depreciation and interest expense.
In the statement of cash flows, cash payments for the lease liability's principal (instalment) and cash payments for the lease liability's interest are presented under financing activities. The transaction related to signing new leases has no initial effect on cash.
| Plant, | Total | Of which | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Buildings/ | equipment and | right-of-use | from credit | Of which | |||
| Right-of-use assets | Land | real estate | other fixtures | Vessels | assets | institutions | from others |
| At 01.01.2020 | |||||||
| Acquisition cos | 50 | 622 | 1,560 | 1,190 | 3,422 | 1,889 | 1,534 |
| Accumulated depreciation and amortisation | -4 | -62 | -253 | -168 | -487 | -239 | -248 |
| Carrying amount at 01.01.2020 | 46 | 560 | 1,307 | 1,022 | 2,935 | 1,650 | 1,285 |
| Financial year 2020 | |||||||
| Carrying amount at 01.01. | 46 | 560 | 1,307 | 1,022 | 2,935 | 1,650 | 1,285 |
| Currency translation differences | 0 | -20 | 6 | -29 | -43 | -44 | 1 |
| Addition of new right-of-use assets | -1 | 107 | 383 | 262 | 751 | 490 | 261 |
| Disposals | 0 | -1 | -1 | -1 | - | ||
| Depreciation and amortisation for the year | -4 | -59 | -290 | -189 | -542 | -290 | -252 |
| Impairment for the year | 0 | ||||||
| Reclassification | 0 | 6 | 0 | 6 | 25 | -20 | |
| Carrying amount at 31.12.2020 | 41 | 589 | 1,411 | 1,066 | 3,106 | 1,830 | 1,276 |
| At 31.12.2020 | |||||||
| Acquisition cost | 45 | 710 | 1,954 | 1,423 | 4,132 | 2,359 | 1,776 |
| Accumulated depreciation and amortisation | -4 | -122 | -543 | -357 | -1,026 | -529 | -500 |
| Carrying amount at 31.12.2020 | 41 | 589 | 1,411 | 1,066 | 3,106 | 1,830 | 1,276 |
Of which secured by mortgage 1,830
| Plant, | Total | Of which | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Right-of-use assets | Land | Buildings/ real estate |
equipment and other fixtures |
Vessels | right-of-use assets |
from credit institutions |
Of which from others |
| Financial year 2021 | |||||||
| Carrying amount at 01.01.2021 | 41 | 589 | 1,411 | 1,066 | 3,106 | 1,830 | 1,276 |
| Currency translation differences | 0 | -6 | -3 | 0 | -10 | -8 | -2 |
| Addition of new right-of-use assets | 14 | 33 | 341 | 655 | 1,043 | 246 | 796 |
| Disposals | 0 | -44 | -6 | -108 | -158 | -39 | -119 |
| Depreciation and amortisation for the year | -4 | -58 | -290 | -213 | -566 | -240 | -326 |
| Impairment for the year | 0 | 0 | 12 | 0 | 12 | 12 | 0 |
| Reclassification | 0 | -46 | -80 | -237 | -363 | 0 | -363 |
| Carrying amount at 31.12.2021 | 50 | 467 | 1,385 | 1,163 | 3,064 | 1,801 | 1,262 |
| At 31.12.2021 | |||||||
| Acquisition cost | 59 | 646 | 2,218 | 1,733 | 4,656 | 2,570 | 2,089 |
| Accumulated depreciation and amortisation | -8 | -180 | -833 | -570 | -1,592 | -769 | -826 |
| Carrying amount at 31.12.2021 | 50 | 466 | 1,385 | 1,163 | 3,064 | 1,801 | 1,262 |
Of which secured by mortgage 1,801
| Lease liabilities | 01.01.2021 | Changes in 2021 |
31.12.2021 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lease liabilities other than to credit institutions | |||
| Long-term portion | 1,056 | 326 | 1,382 |
| Short-term portion | 235 | 42 | 277 |
| Total | 1,291 | 368 | 1,659 |
| Lease liabilities to credit institutions | |||
| Long-term portion | 1,094 | -69 | 1,025 |
| Short-term portion | 271 | -6 | 265 |
| Total | 1,365 | -75 | 1,290 |
| Total lease liabilities | |||
| Long-term portion | 2,150 | 257 | 2,407 |
| Short-term portion | 506 | 36 | 542 |
| Total | 2,656 | 293 | 2,949 |
Leased assets booked as finance lease is specified in note 11 and note 23, whilst maturities and balances of financial leases are specified in note 17.
| Depreciation right-of-use assets | Note | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Depreciation, fixed assets | 11 | 963 | 929 |
| Depreciation, right-of-use assets leased from credit institutions | 11 | 247 | 252 |
| Depreciation, right-of-use assets leased from others | 11 | 320 | 290 |
| Amortisation, intangible assets | 10 | 51 | 48 |
| Total depreciation and amortisation | 1,580 | 1,519 | |
| Accelerated depreciation related to IFRS 16 | 320 | 290 | |
| Interest expense on right-of-use assets | Note | 2021 | 2020 |
| Interest expense on lease liabilities to credit institutions | 19 | 29 | 33 |
| Interest expense on lease liabilities to others | 19 | 55 | 48 |
| Interest expenses on lease liabilities | 84 | 81 | |
| Other interest expense | 19 | 238 | 260 |
| Total interest expense, cf. note 19 | 19 | 322 | 341 |
| Additional interest expense related to IFRS 16 | 55 | 48 |
| 2021 Company | Registered office | Ownership/voting share | Acquisition cost | Fair value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Euro-Terminal AS | Bergen, Norway | 16.70% | 22 | 26 |
| Bulandet Eiendom AS | Bulandet, Norway | minor | 1 | 1 |
| DNB - Private Equity fund | Norway | minor | 5 | 5 |
| Other shares | minor | 10 | 15 | |
| Total non-current assets | 38 | 47 |
| 2020 Company | Registered office | Ownership/voting share | Acquisition cost | Fair value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Euro-Terminal AS | Bergen, Norway | 16.70% | 22 | 26 |
| Bulandet Eiendom AS | Bulandet, Norway | minor | 1 | 1 |
| DNB - Private Equity fund | Norway | minor | 5 | 5 |
| Other shares | minor | 10 | 10 | |
| Total non-current assets | 38 | 42 |
| Reconciliation of the carrying amount of investments in other shares | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|
| At 01.01. | 42 | 40 |
| Additions through business combinations | 5 | 0 |
| Additions/disposals | 0 | 2 |
| At 31.12. | 47 | 42 |
| Minus: share of non-current assets | -47 | -42 |
| Share of current assets | 0 | 0 |
There were no impairment losses on investments in other shares in 2021 and 2020.
The Group is controlled by Laco AS which owns 55.55% of the company's shares. The remaining 44.45% of the shares are widely held. The ultimate parent of the Group is Laco AS.
The majority of transactions with related parties are carried out through;
In addition, the Group had some minor transactions with related
parties such as the associated companies Pelagia and Marin IT AS (ownership directly by parent Company).
Lerøy Seafood Group ASA acquired Lerøy Årskog AS from Laco AS, the ultimate parent company, for NOK 38.9 million. The transaction was carried out after arm length principle. Please see note 6 for further information.
The following transactions were conducted with related parties:
| a) Sales of goods and services | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|
| Sales | ||
| - associates | 84 | 103 |
| - ultimate parent and its subsidiaries | 1 | 9 |
| - close family members of controlling owner | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 86 | 112 |
Group companies have sold services as harvesting, filleting and storage of salmon to associated companies. The Group has also sold administrative services to associated companies.
| b) Purchase of goods and services | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|
| Purchase | ||
| - associates | 642 | 640 |
| - close family members of controlling owner | 0 | 0 |
| - ultimate parent and its subsidiaries | 131 | 76 |
| Total | 773 | 717 |
All goods and services are bought based on the market price and terms that would be available for third parties.
The Group has bought fish and fish products, and renting wellboats from associated companies. The Group has bought administrative services such as IT, reception, catering, accounting and secretaryand financial from associated companies.
| c) SOFP items arising from purchase and sale of goods and services | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|
| Receivables from related parties | ||
| - ultimate parent and its subsidiaries | 0 | 1 |
| - associates | 39 | 52 |
| - close family members of controlling owner | 0 | 0 |
| Debt to related parties | ||
| - ultimate parent and its subsidiaries | 10 | 14 |
| - associates | 41 | 51 |
The receivables from related parties arise mainly from sale transactions and are due one month after date of sale. The receivables are unsecured in nature and bear no interest.
The payable to related parties arise mainly from purchase transactions and are due one month after the date of purchase. The payable bear no interest.
| 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|
| Tax for the year is as follows: | ||
| Tax payable | 743 | 413 |
| Change in deferred tax/tax asset | 195 | -210 |
| Correction, prior years | 1 | 1 |
| Tax | 939 | 204 |
| Tax reconciliation | ||
| Profit before tax | 4,376 | 1,027 |
| Tax calculated using the nominal tax rate | 1,003 | 235 |
| Income from associates | -74 | -46 |
| Other differences | 13 | 10 |
| Deferred tax asset not recognised in the SOFP | -3 | 5 |
| Tax | 939 | 204 |
| Weighted average tax rate | 21.5 % | 19.9 % |
| Change in gross book deferred tax | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|
| Carrying amount at 01.01. | 3,203 | 3,443 |
| Recognised in the period | 195 | -225 |
| Recognised in other comprehensive income in the period | 18 | -10 |
| Exchange differences | 8 | -5 |
| Effect of business combinations | 19 | - |
| Net balance sheet value at 31.12. | 3,443 | 3,203 |
| Balance sheet value of deferred tax asset | -69 | -58 |
| Balance sheet value of deferred tax | 3,512 | 3,261 |
| Net balance sheet value at 31.12. | 3,443 | 3,203 |
The movement in deferred income tax assets and liabilities during the year:
| Inventories | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Change in book value of deferred tax |
Non-current assets |
Current assets |
and biological assets |
Liabilities | Loss carry forward |
Other differences |
Total |
| Carrying amount at 01.01.2020 | 2,214 | -6 | 1,268 | -37 | -46 | 51 | 3,443 |
| Recognised in 2020 | -31 | -5 | -154 | 3 | -26 | -11 | -225 |
| Recognised in other comprehensive | |||||||
| income in the period | - | - | - | - | - | -10 | -10 |
| Exchange differences | -6 | - | 1 | 1 | - | 0 | -5 |
| 31.12.2020 | 2,176 | -12 | 1,114 | -33 | -73 | 30 | 3,203 |
| Recognised in 2021 | -10 | 8 | 209 | 1 | 41 | -54 | 195 |
| Recognised in other comprehensive | |||||||
| income in the period | 18 | - | - | - | - | - | 18 |
| Exchange differences | 10 | - | - | -1 | - | - | 8 |
| Effect of business combinations | 19 | - | - | - | - | - | 19 |
| 31.12.2021 | 2,212 | -4 | 1,322 | -33 | -31 | -23 | 3,443 |
Deferred income tax assets and liabilities are offset when there is a legally enforceable right to offset current tax assets against current tax liabilities and when the deferred income taxes relate to the same fiscal authority.
| Specification of temporary differences not included in deferred tax | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|
| Non-current assets | -44 | -44 |
| Loss carryforward | -833 | -806 |
| Interest deduction carryforward | -94 | -94 |
| Liabilities | -103 | -92 |
| Other differences | 24 | 113 |
| Total temporary differences not included in deferred tax | -1,049 | -922 |
| Including net deferred tax asset not recognised in the SOFP | -231 | -203 |
The consolidated financial statements include AUSS and the following subsidiaries:
| Comments | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Company | on change | Country | Parent company | Ownership % |
| Lerøy Seafood Group ASA | Norway | Austevoll Seafood ASA | 52.69% | |
| Brdr. Schlie's Fiskeeksport A/S | 2) | Denmark | Seafoods Danmark A/S | 100.00% |
| Dragøy Grossist AS | 2) | Norway | Lerøy Nord AS | 51.00% |
| Eurosalmon SAS | France | SAS Lerøy Seafood France | 100.00% | |
| Finnmark Havfiske AS | Norway | Havfisk Båtsfjord AS | 13.34% | |
| Finnmark Havfiske AS | Norway | Havfisk Finnmark AS | 78.45% | |
| Finnmark Havfiske AS | Norway | Havfisk Nordkyn AS | 5.84% | |
| Fishcut SAS | France | SAS Lerøy Seafood France | 100.00% | |
| Hammerfest Industrifiske AS | Norway | Havfisk Finnmark AS | 60.00% | |
| Havfisk Båtsfjord AS | Norway | Havfisk Finnmark AS | 100.00% | |
| Havfisk Finnmark AS | Norway | Lerøy Havfisk AS | 100.00% | |
| Havfisk Management AS | Norway | Havfisk Finnmark AS | 100.00% | |
| Havfisk Melbu AS | Norway | Lerøy Havfisk AS | 100.00% | |
| Havfisk Nordkyn AS | Norway | Havfisk Finnmark AS | 100.00% | |
| Havfisk Stamsund AS | Norway | Lerøy Havfisk AS | 100.00% | |
| Laks- & Vildtcentralen AS | Norway | Lerøy Seafood Group ASA | 100.00% | |
| Laksefjord AS | Norway | Lerøy Aurora AS | 0.00% | |
| Leroy Processing Canarias SL | Spain | Leroy Processing Spain S.L. | 100.00% | |
| Leroy Processing Spain S.L. | Spain | Lerøy Seafood Group ASA | 100.00% | |
| Leroy Seafood Italy | Italy | Lerøy Seafood Group ASA | 100.00% | |
| Lerøy & Strudshavn AS | Norway | Lerøy Seafood Group ASA | 100.00% | |
| Lerøy Alfheim AS | Norway | Lerøy Seafood Group ASA | 100.00% | |
| Lerøy Aurora AS | Norway | Lerøy Seafood Group ASA | 100.00% | |
| Lerøy Bulandet AS | Norway | Lerøy Seafood AS | 83.43% | |
| Lerøy Culinar B.V. | 9) | Holland | Rodè Retail B.V. | 0.00% |
| Lerøy Delico AS | Norway | Lerøy Seafood Group ASA | 100.00% | |
| Leröy Finland OY | Finland | Lerøy Seafood Group ASA | 100.00% | |
| Lerøy Fossen AS | Norway | Lerøy Seafood Group ASA | 100.00% | |
| Lerøy Germany GmbH | Germany | Lerøy Seafood Holding B.V. | 100.00% | |
| Lerøy Havfisk AS | Norway | Lerøy Seafood Group ASA | 100.00% | |
| Lerøy Midt AS | Norway | Lerøy Seafood Group ASA | 100.00% | |
| Lerøy Nord AS | Norway | Lerøy Seafood Group ASA | 51.00% | |
| Lerøy Norway Seafoods AS | Norway | Lerøy Seafood Group ASA | 100.00% | |
| Lerøy Ocean Harvest AS | Norway | Lerøy Seafood Group ASA | 100.00% | |
| Lerøy Portugal Lda | Portugal | Lerøy Seafood Group ASA | 100.00% | |
| Lerøy Quality Group AS | Norway | Lerøy Seafood AS | 100.00% | |
| Lerøy Schile A/S | 2) | Denmark | Seafood Danmark A/S | 100.00% |
| Leröy Seafood AB | Sweden | Lerøy Sverige AB | 100.00% | |
| Lerøy Seafood AS | Norway | Lerøy Seafood Group ASA | 100.00% |
| Comments | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Company | on change | Country | Parent company | Ownership % |
| Lerøy Seafood Center B.V. | Holland | Lerøy Seafood Holding B.V. | 100.00% | |
| Lerøy Seafood Convenience B.V. | Holland | Lerøy Seafood Holding B.V. | 100.00% | |
| Lerøy Seafood France SAS | France | Lerøy Seafood AS | 100.00% | |
| Lerøy Seafood Holding B.V. | Holland | Lerøy Seafood Group ASA | 100.00% | |
| Lerøy Seafood Netherlands B.V. | Holland | Lerøy Seafood Holding B.V. | 100.00% | |
| Lerøy Seafood Real Estate B.V. | Holland | Lerøy Seafood Holding B.V. | 100.00% | |
| Lerøy Seafood USA Inc | USA | Lerøy Seafood AS | 100.00% | |
| Lerøy Sjømatgruppen AS | Norway | Lerøy Trondheim AS | 7.50% | |
| Lerøy Sjømatgruppen AS | Norway | Lerøy Nord AS | 2.50% | |
| Lerøy Sjømatgruppen AS | Norway | Laks- & Vildtcentralen AS | 25.00% | |
| Lerøy Sjømatgruppen AS | Norway | Lerøy Delico AS | 17.50% | |
| Lerøy Sjømatgruppen AS | Norway | Lerøy Alfheim AS | 23.75% | |
| Lerøy Sjøtroll Kjærelva AS | Norway | Sjøtroll Havbruk AS | 50.00% | |
| Lerøy Sjøtroll Kjærelva AS | Norway | Lerøy Vest AS | 50.00% | |
| Lerøy Smögen Seafood AB | Sweden | Lerøy Sverige AB | 100.00% | |
| Lerøy Sverige AB | Sweden | Lerøy Seafood Group ASA | 100.00% | |
| Lerøy Trondheim AS | Norway | Lerøy Seafood Group ASA | 100.00% | |
| Leröy Turkey Su Űr nleri San. Ve Tic A.S. | Turkey | Lerøy Seafood Group ASA | 100.00% | |
| Lerøy Vest AS | Norway | Lerøy Seafood Group ASA | 100.00% | |
| Lerøy Årskog AS | 1) | Norway | Lerøy Seafood Group ASA | 100.00% |
| Melbu Fryselager AS | Norway | Lerøy Norway Seafoods AS | 100.00% | |
| Nigra Fiskeeksport A/S | 2) | Denmark | Brdr. Schlie's Fiskeeksport A/S | 100.00% |
| Nordland Havfiske AS | Norway | Havfisk Melbu AS | 47.07% | |
| Nordland Havfiske AS | Norway | Havfisk Stamsund AS | 52.93% | |
| Norsk Oppdrettservice AS | Norway | Lerøy Seafood Group ASA | 51.00% | |
| Norway Seafoods S.A.S. | France | Lerøy Norway Seafoods AS | 100.00% | |
| Ove Johnsen Fisk en Gros ApS | 2) | Denmark | Seafood Danmark A/S | 100.00% |
| P. Tabbel & Co A/S | 2) | Denmark | Seafood Danmark A/S | 100.00% |
| Preline Fishfarming System AS | Norway | Lerøy Seafood Group ASA | 96.00% | |
| Rodè Vis International AS | 9) | Norway | Lerøy Seafood Holding B.V. | 0.00% |
| Scan Fish Danmark A/S | 2) | Denmark | Seafood Danmark A/S | 100.00% |
| Seafood Danmark A/S | 2) | Denmark | Lerøy Seafood Group ASA | 77.59% |
| Senja Akvakultur Senter AS | 8) | Norway | Lerøy Aurora AS | 0.00% |
| Sirevaag AS | Norway | Lerøy Delico AS | 100.00% | |
| Sjømathuset AS | Norway | Lerøy Seafood Group ASA | 100.00% | |
| Sjøtroll Havbruk AS | Norway | Lerøy Seafood Group ASA | 50.71% | |
| Sørvær Kystfiskeinvest AS | Norway | Lerøy Norway Seafoods AS | 51.00% | |
| Thorfisk A/S | 2) | Denmark | Seafood Danmark A/S | 100.00% |
| Wannebo International AS | 2) | Denmark | Brdr. Schlie's Fiskeeksport A/S | 100.00% |
| Comments | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Company | on change | Country | Parent company | Ownership % |
| AUSS Shared Service AS | Norway | Austevoll Seafood ASA | 100.00% | |
| Austevoll Laksepakkeri AS | Norway | Austevoll Seafood ASA | 100.00% | |
| AUSS Laks AS | Norway | Austevoll Laksepakkeri AS | 100.00% | |
| Austevoll Eiendom AS | Norway | Austevoll Seafood ASA | 100.00% | |
| Austevoll Pacific AS | Norway | Austevoll Seafood ASA | 100.00% | |
| Gateport Overseas Inc. * | Panama | Austevoll Pacific AS | 100.00% | |
| Andean Oportunities Fund Ltd. * | Cayman Islands | Gateport Overseas Inc. | 100.00% | |
| Dordogne Holdings Ltd. * | Panama | Gateport Overseas Inc. | 66.67% | |
| Dordogne Holdings Ltd. * | Panama | Andean Oportunities Fund Ltd. | 33.33% | |
| Austral Group S.A.A. | Peru | Dordogne Holdings Ltd. | 90.12% | |
| Alumrock Overseas S.A | Peru | Austral Group S.A.A. | 98.27% | |
| A-Fish AS | Norway | Austevoll Seafood ASA | 100.00% | |
| Beechwood Ltd. ** | 9) | Panama | A-Fish AS | 0.00% |
| FoodCorp Chile S.A. | Chile | A-Fish AS | 73.61% | |
| FoodCorp Chile S.A. | Chile | Austevoll Seafood ASA | 26.39% | |
| FoodCorp Peru S.A. | Peru | FoodCorp Chile S.A. | 99.99% | |
| Br. Birkeland AS | Norway | Austevoll Seafood ASA | 42.92% | |
| Br. Birkeland Drift AS | Norway | Br. Birkeland AS | 50.00% | |
| Br. Birkeland Fiskebåtrederi AS | Norway | Br. Birkeland AS | 100.00% | |
| Opilio AS | Norway | Br. Birkeland AS | 100.00% | |
| Talbor AS | Norway | Br. Birkeland AS | 100.00% | |
| Br. Birkeland Farming AS | Norway | Austevoll Seafood ASA | 55.24% | |
| Br. Birkeland Drift AS | Norway | Br. Birkeland Farming AS | 50.00% | |
| Kobbevik og Furuholmen Oppdrett AS | Norway | Br. Birkeland Farming AS | 100.00% | |
* The company are Norwegian object of taxation
** Beechwood Ltd. was dissolved in May 2021
The changes in ownership in the subsidiaries have been significant in 2021, and are commented in note 6.
The changes in ownership in the subsidiaries have been insignificant in 2020, and are not commented further.
The Group's accounts are submitted in accordance with international standards for financial reporting (IFRS) and interpretations established by the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) and adopted by the EU. In addition, the Board and management have chosen to present certain alternative performance measures (APMs) to make the Group's developments simpler to understand. The Board and management are of the opinion that these performance measures are in demand and utilised by investors, analysts, credit institutions and other stakeholders. The alternative performance measures are derived from the performance measures defined in IFRS. The figures are defined below. They are consistently calculated and presented in addition to other performance measures, in line with the Guidelines on Alternative Performance Measures from the European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA).
EBIT before fair value adjustments is an APM utilised by the Group. Pursuant to IFRS, biological assets (fish in the sea) shall be measured at fair value in the statement of financial position (IAS 41). Estimates of fair value require various assumptions about the future, including price developments. Changes in the market's price expectations may therefore result in major changes in carried value. As this change in value is included in the operating profit or loss (EBIT) as defined in IFRS, this figure alone is not sufficient to illustrate the Group's performance during the period. The same applies to other items on the statement of financial position related to biological assets, onerous contracts (IAS 37) and financial Fish Pool contracts (IFRS 9). The Group has therefore elected to present operating profit as it would be presented before recognition of the above-mentioned fair value adjustments, as an alternative performance measure. By presenting (1) EBIT before fair value adjustments, (2) fair value adjustments in the period and (3) EBIT after fair value adjustments, the user of the financial statements will easily be able to identify how much of the operating profit comprises changes in fair value (fair value adjustments) and thereby compare performance with other companies in the same industry. The note on biological assets contains a detailed description of how fair value adjustment is calculated and the figures for each component. The following components are included:
| Operating profit before fair value adjustments | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating profit | 4,332 | 1,205 |
| - Fair value adjustments | -1,114 | 954 |
| Operating profit before fair value adjustments | 3,218 | 2,159 |
Fair value adjustments comprises:
1. Change in fair value adjustment on fish in sea
2. Change in fair value adjustment on roe, fry and cleaning fish *
3. Change in fair value adjustment on onerous contracts (salmon and trout)
4. Change in fair value adjustment on Fish Pool contracts (financial contracts on salmon)
* For this group historical cost provides the best estimate of fair value. See note on biological assets for further details
EBITDA before fair value adjustments is an APM. Calculation is identical as the calculation of "EBIT before fair value adjustments" (above).
| Operating profit before depreciation, amortisation and fair value adjustments | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|
| Operating profit | 4,332 | 1,205 |
| Depreciation and amortisation | 1,592 | 1,516 |
| Operating profit before depreciation and amortisation (EBITDA) | 5,924 | 2,721 |
| - Fair value adjustments | -1,114 | 954 |
| Operating profit before depreciation, amortisation and fair value adjustments | 4,810 | 3,675 |
Profit before tax and fair value adjustments is an APM utilised by the Group. Pursuant to IFRS, biological assets (fish in the sea) shall be measured at fair value in the statement of financial position (IAS 41). The APM demonstrates how the result would have been if IAS 41 not had been applied. This implies that the FV adjustment on fish in sea are reversed (eliminated). This includes both the group`s own FV adjustment and also the FV adjustments included in the income from associated companies (AC) also applying IAS 41, following the equity method. The components included are:
| Profit before tax and fair value adjustments | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|
| Profit before tax | 4,376 | 1,027 |
| - Fair value adjustments | -1,114 | 954 |
| - Fair value adj. incl. in share of profit from associates * | -6 | 56 |
| Profit before tax and fair value adjustments | 2,037 |
* See note on biological assets for details.
NIBD is an APM utilised by the Group. The figure shows how much capital the Group employs and is an important key figure for stakeholders who are planning to grant financing to the Group and for stakeholders who want to value the company. The Group therefore defines NIBD as interest-bearing commitments, both short-term and long-term, to persons or institutions with the main purpose of providing financing and/or credit, minus interest-bearing cash or cash equivalents. This implies that long-term interestbearing receivables (assets) and other lease commitments with the exception of leasing debt to credit institutions (liability) are not included. The latter component comprises most of the new lease commitments carried in connection with implementation of IFRS 16. The following components from the statement of financial position are included:
| Net interest-bearing debt (NIBD) | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|
| Loans from credit institutions * | 7,396 | 6,675 |
| + Lease liabilities to credit institutions * | 1,290 | 1,364 |
| + Other long-term loans * | 30 | 25 |
| + Overdrafts and other short-term credits | 583 | 1,050 |
| - Liquid assets | -5,329 | -4,463 |
| Net interest-bearing debt (NIBD) ** | 3,970 | 4,650 |
* Both long-term and short-term
** See note on Net interest bearing debt for an overview of changes during the period
The principal accounting policies applied in the preparation of these consolidated financial statements are set out below. These policies have been consistently applied to all the years presented, unless otherwise stated.
The consolidated financial statements of Austevoll Seafood Group have been prepared in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) as adopted by the EU.
The consolidated financial statements have been prepared under the historical cost convention, as modified by:
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with IFRS requires the use of certain critical accounting estimates. It also requires management to exercise its judgment in the process of applying the Group's accounting policies. The areas involving a higher degree of judgment or complexity, or areas where assumptions and estimates are significant to the consolidated financial statements, are disclosed in note 2.
In 2021, the IASB and EU have not adopted any new standards for obligatory application in the current financial year.
The Group has chosen not to early adopt some of the new standards and interpretations that were published in the accounting period under review and that were not mandatory for 2021. The new standards and interpretations are not expected to have a material impact on the financial statements for either the period under review or for future periods and expected transactions.
Subsidiaries are all entities over which the Group has control. Control is defined as when the parent company has ownership interests that directly or indirectly convey more than half of the voting rights in a company, unless it can clearly be demonstrated that ownership does not grant control.
Control can also be based on agreements with other shareholders, irrespective of whether ownership exists as mentioned above.
Control also exists when the parent company has ownership interests that convey half or less of the voting rights in a company, but where the parent company also has:
Control may also exist when a company owns a large minority interest with voting rights and no other owner or group of owners has control.
Subsidiaries are fully consolidated from the date on which control is transferred to the Group. They are deconsolidated from the date that control ceases.
The acquisition method is applied to acquisition of businesses. Identifiable assets, debt and contingent liabilities are recognised at fair value on the date of acquisition.
If the business combination is achieved in stages, the acquisition date fair value of the acquirer`s previously held equity interest in the acquire is re-measured to fair value at the acquisition date; any gains or losses arising from such re-measurement are recognised in profit or loss.
The contingent consideration is measured at fair value on the date of acquisition. Subsequent changes in fair value of the contingent consideration are recognised, unless this is an equity instrument. Contingent considerations classified as equity are not remeasured, and subsequent settlements are charged to equity.
Inter-company transactions, balances and unrealised gains and losses on transactions between Group companies are eliminated. Accounting policies of subsidiaries have been changed where necessary to ensure consistency with the policies adopted by the Group.
Transactions with non-controlling interests in subsidiaries that do not result in loss of control are treated as equity transactions. In the event of further acquisitions, the difference between the
consideration and the shares' proportional share of the carrying amount of net assets in the subsidiary is charged to shareholders' equity in the parent company. Gain or loss on the sale to noncontrolling interests is correspondingly charged to equity.
When the Group ceases to have control any retained interest in the entity is re-measured to its fair value at the date when control is lost, with the change in carrying amount recognised in profit or loss. The fair value is the initial carrying amount for the purposes of subsequently accounting for the retained interest as an associate, joint venture or financial asset. In addition, any amounts previously recognised in other comprehensive income in respect of that entity are accounted for as if the Group had directly disposed of the related assets or liabilities. This may mean that amounts previously recognised in other comprehensive income are reclassified to profit or loss.
Associates are all entities over which the Group has significant influence but not control, generally accompanying a shareholding of between 20% and 50% of the voting rights. Investments in associates are accounted for using the equity method of accounting. Under the equity method, the investment is initially recognised at cost, and the carrying amount is increased or decreased to recognise the investor`s share of the profit or loss of the investee after the date of acquisition. The Group's investment in associates includes goodwill (net of any accumulated impairment loss) identified on acquisition.
If the ownership interest in an associate is reduced but significant influence is retained, only a proportionate share of the amounts previously recognised in other comprehensive income are reclassified to profit or loss where appropriate.
The Group's share of post-acquisition profit or loss is recognised in the income statement, and its share of post-acquisition movements in other comprehensive income is recognised in other comprehensive income with a corresponding adjustment to the carrying amount of the investment. When the Group's share of losses in an associate equals or exceeds its interest in the associate, including any other unsecured receivables, the Group does not recognise further losses, unless it has incurred legal or constructive obligations or made payments on behalf of the associate.
The Group determines at each reporting date whether there is any objective evidence that the investment in the associate is impaired. If this is the case, the Group calculates the amount of impairment as the difference between the recoverable amount of the associate and it's carrying value and recognise the amount adjacent to 'share of profit/(loss) of an associate' in the income statement.
Profit and losses resulting from upstream and downstream transactions between the Group and its associate are recognised in the Groups financial statement only to the extent of unrelated investors interest in the associates. Unrealised losses are also eliminated unless the transaction provides evidence of an impairment of the asset transferred. Accounting policies of associates have been changed where necessary to ensure consistency with the policies adopted by the Group.
Dilution gains and losses arising in investments in associates are recognised in the income statement.
The Group has applied IFRS 11 to all joint arrangements with restatement of comparatives. Under IFRS 11 investments in joint arrangements are classified as either joint operations or joint ventures depending on the contractual rights and obligations of each investor. The investments in Pelagia should be considered as joint ventures. Joint ventures are accounted for using the equity method, whereas the joint operation is accounted for by proportional consolidation.
Under the equity method of accounting, interests in joint ventures are initially recognised at cost and adjusted thereafter to recognise the Group's share of the post-acquisition profits or losses and movements in other comprehensive income. When the Group's share of losses in a joint venture equals or exceeds its interests in the joint ventures (which includes any long-term interests that, in substance, form part of the Group's net investment in the joint ventures), the Group does not recognise further losses, unless it has incurred obligations or made payments on behalf of the joint ventures.
Unrealised gains on transactions between the Group and its joint ventures are eliminated to the extent of the Group's interest in the joint ventures. Unrealised losses are also eliminated unless the transaction provides evidence of an impairment of the asset transferred. Accounting policies of the joint ventures have been changed where necessary to ensure consistency with the policies adopted by the Group.
Operating segments are reported in a manner consistent with the internal reporting provided to the chief operating decision-maker. The chief operating decision-maker, who is responsible for allocating resources and assessing performance of the operating segments, has been identified as the board of directors that makes strategic decisions.
Items included in the financial statements of each of the Group's entities are measured using the currency of the primary economic environment in which the entity operates ('the functional currency'). The consolidated financial statements are presented in Norwegian Kroner (NOK), which is the parent company's functional and presentation currency.
Foreign currency transactions are translated into the functional currency using the exchange rates prevailing at the dates of the transactions or valuation where items are re-measured. Foreign exchange gains and losses resulting from the settlement of such transactions and from the translation at year-end exchange rates of monetary assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies are recognised in the income statement, except when deferred in other comprehensive income as qualifying cash flow hedges and qualifying net investment hedges. Foreign exchange gains and losses that relate to borrowings and cash and cash equivalents are presented in the income statement within 'finance income or costs'. All other foreign exchange gains and losses are presented in the income statement within 'Other (losses)/gains – net'.
The results and financial position of all the Group entities (none of which has the currency of a hyperinflationary economy) that have a functional currency different from the presentation currency are translated into the presentation currency as follows:
When a foreign operation is disposed of, exchange differences that were recorded in equity are recognised in the income statement as part of the gain or loss on sale.
Goodwill and fair value adjustments arising on the acquisition of a foreign entity are treated as assets and liabilities of the foreign entity and translated at closing rate. Exchange differences arising are recognised in other comprehensive income.
Revenue comprises the fair value of the consideration received or receivable for the sale of goods in the ordinary course of the Group's activities. Revenue is shown net of value-added tax, returns, rebates and discounts and after eliminated sales within the Group.
The Group recognises revenue when the amount of revenue can be reliably measured, it is probable that future economic benefits will flow to the entity and when specific criteria have been met for each of the Group's activities as described below. The amount of revenue is not considered to be reliably measurable until all contingencies relating to the sale have been resolved. The Group bases its estimates on historical results, taking into consideration the type of customer, the type of transaction and the specifics of each arrangement.
Sales of goods are recognised when a Group entity has delivered products to the customer, the customer has accepted the goods and when the risks and rewards related to the goods have been transferred to the customer.
Dividend income is recognised when the right to receive payment is established.
The tax expense for the period comprises current and deferred tax. Tax is recognised in the income statement, except to the extent that it relates to items recognised in other comprehensive income or directly in equity.
The current income tax charge is calculated on the basis of the tax laws enacted or substantively enacted at the balance sheet date in the countries where the company's subsidiaries and associates operate and generate taxable income.
The management continuously assesses the statements made in the tax return in situations where prevailing tax legislation is subject to interpretation. Based on the management's assessment, provisions are made for expected tax payments when deemed necessary.
Deferred income tax is provided in full at nominal values, using the liability method, on temporary differences arising between the tax bases of assets and liabilities and their carrying amounts in the consolidated financial statements. Deferred income tax is determined using tax rates (and laws) that have been enacted or substantially enacted by the balance sheet date and are expected to apply when the related deferred income tax asset is realised or the deferred income tax liability is settled.
Deferred income tax assets are recognised only to the extent that it is probable that future taxable profit will be available against which the temporary differences can be utilised.
Deferred tax is calculated on temporary differences from investments in subsidiaries, associated companies and jointly controlled operations, with the exception of situations where the Group has control over the timing of the reversal of the temporary differences and it is probable that these differences will not be reversed in the foreseeable future. The Group is not normally able to gain control over the reversal of temporary differences for associated companies. This would only be the case if an agreement had been signed enabling the Group to control reversal of temporary differences.
Deferred tax is recognised for temporary differences related to the actual investment in subsidiaries, associated companies and jointly controlled operations when it is no longer probable that the difference will not be reversed at a later date.
Deferred income tax assets and liabilities are offset when there is a legally enforceable right to offset current tax assets against current tax liabilities and when the deferred income tax assets and liabilities relate to income taxes levied by the same taxation authority on either the same taxable entity or different taxable entities where there is an intention to settle the balances on a net basis.
Goodwill arises on the acquisition of subsidiaries and represents the excess of the consideration transferred, the amount of any non-controlling interest in the acquiree and the acquisition-date fair value of any previous equity interest in the acquiree over the fair value of the identifiable net assets acquired. If the total of consideration transferred, non-controlling interest recognised and previously held interest measured at fair value is less than the fair value of the net assets of the subsidiary acquired, in the case of a bargain purchase, the difference is recognised directly in the income statement.
For the purpose of impairment testing, goodwill acquired in a business combination is allocated to each of the CGUs, or Groups of CGUs, that is expected to benefit from the synergies of the combination. Each unit or Group of units to which the goodwill is allocated represents the lowest level within the entity at which the goodwill is monitored for internal management purposes. Goodwill is monitored at the operating segment level.
Goodwill impairment reviews are undertaken annually or more frequently if events or changes in circumstances indicate a potential impairment. The carrying value of the CGU containing the goodwill is compared to the recoverable amount, which is the higher of value in use and the fair value less costs of disposal. Any impairment is recognised immediately as an expense and is not subsequently reversed.
Below is a detailed description of the Group's assessments in situations where the Group has established that an asset has an indefinite useful life, cf. IAS 38.122. Intangible assets with an indefinite useful life are not amortised, but tested for impairment once a year as a minimum. Reference is made to the Note 11 on intangible assets for information on impairment tests. All licenses are distributed to the Group companies by the Government, and as such the licenses are at all-time subject to each country's fishing and fish farming quota regulations.
Licences related to farming are not amortised. Licences are carried at cost price less any accumulated write-downs. Licences are tested annually for impairment. An overview of the different licenses involved in this operating segment, in terms of type, number and volume, is provided in the note 10. A more detailed explanation supporting the assessment that the assets have an indefinite useful life is provided below.
The licence scheme for production of salmon and trout in Norway has been implemented by the Storting (the Norwegian Parliament) and adopted in the Norwegian Act relating to aquaculture (Aquaculture Act). The Ministry of Trade, Industry and Fisheries is responsible for allocation of aquaculture permits (licences). All activities involving aquaculture require a licence. It is prohibited to farm salmon/trout without a licence from the authorities, cf. section 4 of the Aquaculture Act. All licences are governed by the same regulations (current Aquaculture Act with provisions) irrespective of when the licence was allocated.
The aquaculture permit entitles the Group to produce salmon and trout in delimited geographic areas (localities), according to the prevailing limitations established at any given time regarding the scope of the permit. The Ministry may prescribe detailed provisions relating to the content of the aquaculture licences by administrative decision or regulations.
The Aquaculture Act is administered centrally by the Ministry of Trade, Industry and Fisheries, and the Directorate of Fisheries is the supervisory authority. Regionally, there are a number of sector authorities that together represent a complete administrative and supervisory authority within the area governed by the Aquaculture Act. The individual county is the regional administrative body, and the Directorate of Fisheries is the appellate body for issues involving localities and licences.
Since January 2005, the limitations on production established for aquaculture licences for salmon and trout have been governed according to a scheme known as Maximum Allowable Biomass (MAB). This specifies the maximum biomass in the sea that a licence holder can have at any given time. The Group has a sufficient number of localities (locality MAB) in the different regions to achieve a satisfactory exploitation of the Group's total MAB. All commercial licenses are currently operational.
The following regulations regarding production limitations apply to the different types of licences held by the Group:
Farming licences are limited in number, i.e. the enterprises are only granted new licences or more production volume subsequent to politically adopted allocation rounds. The maximum allowable biomass (MAB) has previously been 780 tonnes of salmon or trout per licence. The maximum allowable biomass (MAB) for the counties of Troms and Finnmark (North Norway) has previously been 945 tonnes of salmon or trout per licence. Following the political decision taken in 2017 that it should be possible to allocate percentage growth per licence based on various conditions, a fixed maximum allowable biomass per licence is no longer specified. The system has been named the "traffic light system". The traffic light system is meant as a permanent framework for mitigating growth in Norwegian aquaculture. In this system the Norwegian coastline was divided into 13 different production areas. With a frequency of 2 years, the different areas are colored red, yellow, or green, based on certain criteria. In areas colored red the maximum production volumes are reduced. In yellow areas there is no change. In green areas, it is opened for growth. A certain portion of the growth are offered to the farmers at a fixed price, while the remaining portion are offered at auction. The farmers are free to choose to purchase the offered growth or not.
Green farming licences are licences that were awarded in 2015 via a dedicated licensing round. Special conditions were attached to these licences, mainly concerning environmental improvement measures. The licences were awarded via open auctions or competitively, based on environmentally focused technology and operating concepts.
Demonstration licences are licences defined as for special purposes. Demonstration licences are granted to enterprises in order to spread knowledge of the aquaculture industry. Such licences are often operated in cooperation with a non-commercial entity.
Teaching licences are another kind of special-purpose licence and are allocated to disseminate knowledge of the fish farming industry. The licences are linked to specific educational institutions and are thus regulated by the county.
Research and development licences are licences awarded in connection with research and development projects in the industry, where dedicated licences are required to carry out the R&D activity.
Harvest cage licences are allocated for the use of sea cages for live fish ready for harvest. These licences are attached to a specific location, which is the Group's harvesting plant for salmon and trout.
Brood stock licences are also licences defined as for special purposes. Brood stock licences are granted for the production of salmon roe utilised to produce juvenile fish.
Juvenile fish licences are licences to produce juvenile salmon and trout in fresh water that in total authorise the licence holder to
produce a specific number of juvenile salmon and trout. There are certain limitations on the size of juvenile fish produced according to the individual licence. Licences are granted on the basis of a discharge permit for a certain number of fish/biomass with a maximum allowable feed consumption per year. In situations where the water source is owned by a third party, an agreement is also required governing the right to utilise the water source.
Section 5, second paragraph of the Aquaculture Act reads: "The Ministry may prescribe detailed provisions relating to the content of the aquaculture licences, including the scope, time limitations, etc., by administrative decision or regulations."
In the legislative background to the Aquaculture Act, White Paper no. 61 2004-2005, the following statement can be found on page 59: "It will remain the case that licences are normally allocated without any specific time limitation. Implementation of such limitations should be reserved for those issues where a time limitation, based on the specific situation, provides for a more complete fulfilment of the Act than if the licence were to be allocated without a time limitation."
The duration of licences is also specified by the Aquaculture Act, which in its most recent revision underlined ownership of licences by allowing the licences to be mortgaged to the benefit of the lender.
There are no time limitations specified in the Group's terms for grow out and juvenile licences, and they are therefore deemed to be time-indefinite production rights according to the prevailing regulations. This also applies for green farming licences.
As the licences are not bound by a time-limited period, there is no need to apply for their renewal. The licences are deemed to be valid pursuant to the Aquaculture Act, unless they are revoked in accordance with the Act. Section 9 of the Aquaculture Act describes the grounds for revocation of a licence. Section 9 states that licences may be revoked due to gross contravention of the provisions of the Act. We can confirm that no operative licences for salmon and trout have been revoked in Norway.
Research and development licences are time-limited, and in principle are valid for the duration of the project. They are often linked to the lifecycle of the salmon, i.e. three years. Applications may be made to renew R&D licences operated in close collaboration with research environments for a further three-year period after the end of the project.
The parent fish licences are granted for 15 years at a time, and applications have to be submitted for their renewal – provided that the licence holder is still involved in production of brood stock for salmon or trout.
Parent fish production is an integral part of the Group's value chain (parent fish production takes place before production of roe and juvenile fish in the value chain), and is therefore closely linked to the breeding system for salmon and trout. The Group's applications for renewal of parent fish licences have always been approved, in line with the prevailing practice in the industry.
The licences for harvest cages are allocated for 10 years at a time. Applications can be submitted for renewal of such licences provided that they are attached to an approved harvesting plant and only utilised to keep fish ready for harvest in immediate proximity to the harvesting plant.
The Group's demonstration licences are granted with a duration of 10 years. Applications can be submitted for renewal of demonstration licences provided that the terms for the licence are met pursuant to the Aquaculture Act.
The Group's teaching licences have been allocated for 10 years. Applications can be submitted for renewal of teaching licences provided that the terms for the licence are met pursuant to the Aquaculture Act.
All licences can be transferred pursuant to section 19 of the Aquaculture Act, and can be mortgaged pursuant to section 20 of the Act. An aquaculture register is kept of all aquaculture licences where transfers and mortgaging are registered. The leasing of aquaculture licences or licence capacity is not permitted. Grow-out licences and parent fish licences can be linked to different locations, but there are certain limitations on moving of licences between the regions defined by the Directorate of Fisheries. In practice, this means that licences cannot be moved between defined regions, which typically follow county borders. Juvenile fish licences are attached to one locality – the locality for which the licence applies.
Payment has been required for new licences granted during more recent allocation rounds. The amount of the payment depends on the allocation criteria, including for example a fixed price versus the auction principle. Given that there is no requirement to apply for renewal of licences, then there are no costs involved in licence renewal.
The costs of maintaining aquaculture licences in Norway are insignificant. There are no annual fees or other types of duties linked to the actual licence. However, there are certain fees to be paid for inspection and control of the licences. Fees also have to be paid to establish new localities and/ or to extend/amend localities. As a main rule, an amount of NOK 12,000 is paid per licence covered by an application for amendment at locality level, cf. section 2 of the Regulation relating to fees and duties for aquaculture activities. All fees and costs are immediately recognised as an operating expense.
According to past and present legislation and the general interpretation and practice in the industry, Norwegian fish farming licences are not a time-limited right, and licences should therefore not be subject to amortisation. Where time-limited R&D licences, demonstration licences and educational licences are concerned, these are awarded free of charge so amortisation is normally not relevant. However, in cases where related acquiring or renewing costs are capitalized, they will be subjected to depreciation over the economic life.
The following factors played a key role in the assessment of whether licences have an indefinite useful life, with reference to the description of the licence types above:
It has also been noted that the licences are registered in the public aquaculture register as being without time limitation.
On this basis, the economic life is assessed to be indefinite for the grow-out licences and juvenile fish licences, in accordance with IAS 38.90.
As mentioned above, these licences are granted for 15 years at a time, and applications can be submitted for renewal. In 2007, the duration of parent fish licences was amended from 10 years to 15 years (amendment to regulation dated 14th of August 2007 no. 986). In the consultation document dated 7th of June 2007, the Ministry stated the following regarding time limitation for parent fish licences in item 3.3: "The recommendation implies that the licences shall be time-limited for a period (...) with clearly defined predictability for extension of new periods. Time-limited licences may however result in less predictability for the entities than licences without time limitations. Predictability is key as breeding and parent fish production is a time-consuming and resourceintensive activity, but this is provided for by (...) a fixed-term period with clearly defined predictability for extension."
IAS 38.94 states that if the contractual or legal rights are assigned for a limited period of time that can be renewed, the useful life of the intangible asset should include the renewal period(s) only if there is documented evidence to support that the cost of the renewal for the entity is not significant. IAS 38.96 provides guidelines describing factors that can be included in this assessment. The following factors have been central to LSG's assessment of indefinite useful life for the parent fish licences:
The Group's demonstration licences are allocated for a period of 10 years. Applications can be submitted for renewal of demonstration licences provided that the terms for the licence are met pursuant to the Aquaculture Act. As with parent fish licences, this type of licence is defined as being for special purposes. Both parent fish and demonstration licences are a type of activity without any clear time limitation. In principle, the same factors as for parent fish licences will apply to demonstration licences.
With one exception, the Group's teaching licences have been allocated for 10 years. Applications can be submitted for renewal
of teaching licences provided that the terms for the licence are met pursuant to the Aquaculture Act. The Group has also taken over one teaching licence pursuant to an open-ended agreement with an educational institution. Since the agreement has a limited undefined useful life, its duration has been estimated at one year.
The licence scheme for fishing rights in Norway has been implemented by the Storting (the Norwegian Parliament) and adopted in the Norwegian Act relating to the right to participate in fishing and catches (Participation Act) dated 26th of March 1999, no. 15 and related Regulations. The Ministry of Trade, Industry and Fisheries is responsible for allocation of the right to participate in Norwegian fisheries.
Section 2 of the Participation Act describes the scope of the Act; "The Act governs entitlement to take part in commercial fishing and catches and other harvesting of wild live marine resources by utilising vessels that are Norwegian pursuant to the provisions in sections 1 and 4 of the Norwegian Maritime Code and vessels that are owned by a foreign national who is resident in Norway, when the overall length of the vessel is less than 15 metres. However, vessels that are Norwegian pursuant to section 1 third paragraph of the Norwegian Maritime Code are not governed by the Act, unless the vessel is owned by a person resident in Norway and the overall length of the vessel is less than 15 metres. This Act defines vessels that are governed by the first and second paragraphs as Norwegian vessels. The Act does not however cover harvesting of anadromous salmon fish as defined in the Act dated 15th May 1992 no. 47 relating to Salmonids and Fresh-Water Fish etc. section 5 letra a. The Ministry is entitled to issue regulations stipulating that all or parts of the Act shall not apply to harvesting of one or more species that are not fish, crustaceous animals, molluscs or sea mammals."
The term "commercial fishing and catches" from section 3 of the Participation Act covers all harvesting of wild live marine resources when this is the professional party's livelihood alone or in cooperation with another business and where the activity requires use of a vessel. More detailed provisions regarding the definition of commercial fishing and catches, including regulations on the requirement for earned income, can be found in the Regulation dated 07.12.2012 no. 1144 concerning commercial permits, registration and marking of fishing boats etc. (commercial permit regulations).
Section 4 of the Participation Act places the following requirements
on commercial permits:
If the permit holder replaces one vessel with another, a new application is required for a new professional permit so that the fishing rights are transferred to the new vessel. Such transfer is normally granted provided that the requirements specified in the Participation Act are fulfilled.
Shares or holdings in a company or merger that directly or indirectly owns vessels registered by mark must not be transferred to a different owner without the advance permission by the Ministry for a change of ownership composition.
The King may issue a resolution to lay down regulations regarding a duty to notify changes in ownership. When such a duty is in force, the prohibition against transfer does not apply until a permit has been issued. The regulations governing duty of notification may however contain a prohibition against transfer until a certain deadline has been reached after the notification has been sent.
A commercial permit is annulled when the owner loses the right of ownership to a vessel, whether by compulsory sale, condemnation, shipwreck etc.
If such incidents are of a less serious nature, the Ministry may decide to retract the commercial permit for a specific period of time. The King may impose supplementary regulations on the retraction of permits.
In order to participate in most types of fisheries, a permit or participation entitlement is required, if the party involved does not intend to participate in an open group, cf. section 12 of the Participation Act relating to the requirement for a special permit, cf. also the regulation of 13th October 2006 no. 1157 (the Licence regulation) and regulation of 13th of December 2018 no. 1911 (the Participation regulation). The licence scheme currently comprises vessels commonly known as the oceangoing fishing fleet. An oceangoing fishing vessel is a vessel that exceeds the general size limit for coastal fishing vessels as defined at any time in the Participation regulation.
These licences have no predetermined time limit. Although licences
do not have a predetermined time limit, section 18 of the Participation Act stipulates that they shall be retracted or are annulled if the commercial permit for the vessel is annulled or retracted. Sections 10 and 11 of the Participation Act apply correspondingly to special permits. The Licence regulation Act stipulates that special permits may be retracted pursuant to the provisions of the Act if, in the space of one calendar year and the two previous years, no deliveries of catches have been registered from the vessel in accordance with the permit.
The Group's vessels have special permits (licences) within pelagic fisheries and whitefish.
The fishing permits (licenses) are valued at cost less any accumulated depreciation and impairment losses. There are no predetermined time limitations specified in the Group's conditions for licences that apply to basic quotas within pelagic fishery, and they are therefore deemed to be time-indefinite rights according to the prevailing regulations.
As the fishing rights are not bound by a time-limited period, there is no need to apply for their renewal. The fishing rights are deemed to be valid pursuant to the Participation Act, and pursuant regulations, unless they are annulled or retracted in accordance with the Participation Act.
The Group also holds fishing rights within pelagic fishery that have a time limit – so-called structural quotas – and these are amortised over the lifetime of the individual structural quota. Please also read below about structural quotas as an intangible asset and the redistribution of structural gains at the expiry of the time limit.
The fisheries licences within whitefish comprise basic quotas with no time limit and structural quotas with a time limit of 20 and 25 years respectively. The structural quotas have a definite useful life and are amortised over the length of the structural period. The basic quotas have an indefinite useful life and are not amortised, but are tested annually for impairment. The structural quotas, which are amortised, meet the definition of intangible assets in accordance with IAS 38, as a structural quota is a legal right, is identifiable and generates economic yield that the company can control. As these are time-limited rights, the structural quotas shall be amortised over the remaining life of the quota until the value is zero, as there is no active market for the rights or any commitment from a third party to acquire the right once its useful
life is over. In the Storting's resolution III dated 7th of May 2020, relating to processing of the Quota Report, "A quota system for increased value creation. A forward-looking fisheries industry" (White Paper 32 (2018–2019)), it was decided that at the expiry of the time limit for structural quotas, the structural gains would be distributed among the group of vessels to which the vessel belonged when the time limit started, and distribution shall be proportionate to the basic quota. Moreover, when the structural quotas are established, the structural gains that accumulate on deduction will be distributed to the group of vessels to which the vessel belongs, and shall be distributed proportionately to the basic quota. For the group of purse seine vessels and pelagic trawlers, the structural gain is distributed when the time limit starts according to the current group to which such vessels belong. This implies that if a vessel has structures that are in accordance with the average for the group of vessels, a vessel will be able to maintain practically the same catch volume once the period for the structural quotas has expired. More detailed information on licences/fishing rights is provided in note 10.
Pursuant to the "Act relating to changes in the Participation Act and the Marine Resources Act (changes in the quota system)", LOV-2021-03-05-7, a number of changes to the Participation Act and Marine Resources Act have been adopted. The key changes, however, have not come into effect. The report below is based on the current legislation and does not therefore take into account changes that will be made when the amendments fully or partly come into effect.
The fishing license is granted by the Production Ministry (Ministerio de la Producción) for the extraction of hydrobiological resources, subject to Fishing Regulations as stipulated by General Law of Fisheries (Decreto Ley N° 25977) and the Regulations for the General Law of Fisheries (Decreto Supremo N° 012-2001-PE).
The Article 44 of the General Law of Fisheries (Decreto Ley N° 25977) says:
Concessions, authorizations and licenses mean specific rights that the Production Ministry grants for an established term for the development of fisheries activities, pursuant to the provisions of this Law and under the conditions determined by its Regulations"
Also, the Article 33 of the Regulation for the General Law of Fisheries (Decreto Supremo N° 012-2001-PE) and its modifications establish:
It means that fishing license only expires in case the legal owner breach the requirements established in the mentioned article 33 of the Regulation for the General Law of Fisheries, otherwise, the fishing license keep in force unlimited.
The Supreme Decree N° 017-2017 (Regulations of control and sanction of fisheries and aquaculture activities) establish the limitations that fleet must fulfil during its operations.
Following, we list the main restrictions that the industry have:
The indeterminate life of fishing license is also subject to lack of severe penalties (maximum four allowed in one year). The main severe penalties are:
announced by the Production Ministry or in unauthorized zones.
Fishing and aquaculture activities are ruled by the "General Fishing and Aquaculture Act Nº 18.892 of 1989" ("Ley General de Pesca y Acuicultura" or LGPA), which has received several modifications during its life, being the latest in Law Nº 20.657 of 9th February 2013. This modification made important amendments to the fishing system in Chile, with the main objective of ensuring the sustainability of fish resources, introducing an ecosystemic view of the marine environment and by improving the fish management, such as adding transferability to the existing individual quota system for industrial fleet and creating a mandatory scientifically supported quota management system.
The management of fisheries is performed by the Undersecretary of Fisheries ("Subsecretaria de Pesca"), a vice-ministry office that reports to the Minister of Economics.
The control of fishing activities of all kind (industrial, artisanal and sport) is under the National Fishing Service ("Servicio Nacional de Pesca" or Sernapesca).
Until the introduction of 2013 fishing law modifications, fishing licenses were linked to a fishing vessel and could not be divided or independently transferred. These types of fishing license ("Permiso de Pesca") still exist for those species out of the list of tradable fishing licenses ("Licencia Transable de Pesca" or LTP), such as giant squid and mackerel, as well as for the artisanal shipowners.
However, main commercial species caught by the industrial fleet moved under the LTP system, which was granted using the same individual quota set by the previous modification established by the fishing law Nª 19.713 of 2001 (due for modification after 12 years in 2013), which was based on 50/50 allocation of historical catches between the years 1997 to 2000 and by vessel hold capacity. This new license system grants industrial shipowner a "LTP-A" fishing license type, which is automatically renewed every 20 years, provided that owner has had a good behaviour in environmental and labour regulations.
These LTPs are divided by fish species and macro-regions (grouped according to the geographical administrative area division of the country - regions). The Fishing Act of 2013 also establishes that 15% of the LTPs will be auctioned when the fisheries reaches 90% of the Maximum Sustainable Yield ("MSY"or "RMS" in Spanish) or after 3 years after the Law came into full effect, in 5% annual allocations. The new quotas will be deducted from the LTP-A, creating a "LTP-B" license valid for 20 years for each of the auctioned lots. After this period, a new auction process is required.
The LTPs are transferable, permanently or temporarily and are also subject to be used as guarantees to financial institutions, something impossible with previous regulation.
Fishing permits for the non-LTP species remain linked to a physical fishing vessel are permanent. Fishing licenses for the LTP-A are granted for 20 years with automatic renewal for same period of time, provided that the license holder has complied with labour and environmental regulations, therefore are considered a permanent license system. LTP-B is a 20-year non-renewable fishing license.
Fishing rights can be lost or reduced (partial loss), if a Company:
A modification to the 2013 Fishing Act is under discussion in Congress, regarding the automatic renewal of current fishing licenses for industrial fisheries every 20 years. The President's initiative is under evaluation in the fishing and financial commissions of the Senate, without any mandatory time limit for the evaluation.
Brands acquired, separately, or as part of a business combination are capitalised as a brand if it meets the definition of an intangible asset and the recognition criteria are satisfied. Brand acquired as part of a business combination are valued at fair value based on valuation done by external valuation experts. Brands assessed to have an indefinite useful life are not amortized but reviewed for impairment not less than annually frequently if events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount may have decreased.
Until 1st of January 2019, property, plant and equipment comprised both the Group's own operating assets and assets held under finance leases. IFRS 16, the new lease accounting standard implemented on 1st January 2019, removes the distinction between operating and finance leases for the lessee. The new standard stipulates that all leases shall be recognised in the statement of financial position. Leased operating assets are designated as "right-of-use assets" in the new standard. The Group has chosen to disclose right-of-use assets as a separate item in the statement of financial position.
As a result, all leases previously recognised in the statement of financial position (finance leases) have been transferred from the items "Vessels" and "Property, plant and other operating assets" to the new item "Right-of-use assets". In addition, the operating leases, previously only disclosed in a note, have been recognised in the statement of financial position.
Property, plant and equipment are recognised at cost less accumulated depreciation and any impairment loss. The same applies to right-of-use assets. Cost may also include transfers from equity for any gains or losses on cash flow hedges of foreign currency purchases of property, plant and equipment.
Subsequent costs are included in the asset's carrying amount or recognised as a separate asset when it is likely that future economic benefits associated with the cost will flow to the Group and the cost can be measured reliably. Other repair and maintenance costs are charged to the income statement in the period in which they are incurred.
Depreciation linked to property, plant and equipment is allocated on a straight-line basis over the expected useful life (depreciation period). Material parts of assets that have different depreciation periods are broken down into components and depreciated separately (component depreciation). Depreciation linked to rightof-use assets is allocated on a straight-line basis over the lease term. Any extension options likely to be exercised are included in the lease term.
Land is not depreciated. Buildings mainly comprise factories and offices.
The expected average useful life of property, plant and equipment, taking component depreciation into account, is estimated at:
| Detail | Sector | Depreciation-period | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vehicles | Wild catch and harvest | 3-10 years | |
| Furniture and other equipment | Wild catch and harvest | 3-25 years | |
| Buildings | Wild catch and harvest | 12-50 years | |
| Fishing vessels and fishing equipment | Wild catch | 8-30 years | |
| Machinery and other equipment - Fishmeal | Wild catch | 10-50 years | |
| Machinery and other equipment - Consumption | Wild catch | 7-30 years | |
| Other production equipment | Wild catch | 3-30 years | |
| Feeding vessels - Fish farming | Harvest | 10-15 years | |
| Vessels - Fish farming | Harvest | 10-15 years | |
| Utilities (components) on vessels | Harvest | 5-10 years | |
| Other production equipment (on sea) - Fish farming | Harvest | 5-15 years | |
| Production equipment (on land) - Fish farming | Harvest | 5-15 years | |
| Components related to production equipment on land | Harvest | 10 years |
The assets' residual values, useful lives and depreciation methods are reviewed, and adjusted if appropriate, at each balance sheet date.
An asset's carrying amount is written down to its recoverable amount if the asset's carrying amount is greater than its estimated recoverable amount. Gains and losses on disposals are determined by comparing proceeds with carrying amount. These are included in the income statement as other gains and losses.
The Group adopted IFRS 16 Leases from 1st of January 2019 using the modified retrospective approach. As a result, the historic comparable figures were not restated. For leases which had previously been classified as operating leases under the principles of IAS 17, the lease liability upon adoption of IFRS 16 is measured as the present value of the remaining lease payments, discounted using the Group's incremental borrowing rate as of 1st of January 2019. Extension periods are included in the leasing calculation when they are reasonably certain to be exercised. The associated right-of use assets were measured at an amount equal to the lease liability, adjusted by the amount of any prepaid or accrued lease payments. The right-of-use asset is depreciated linearly from the commencement date to the earlier of the end of the useful life of the right-of-use asset or the end of the lease term. For leases that were previously classified as financial leasing under IAS 17, the book value of the right-of-use asset and lease liability is brought forward at the date of implementation of IFRS 16 (1st January 2019). Accumulated depreciations on leased assets as of implementation date (depreciations according to IAS 17) were not transferred to the new group with right-of-use assets.
For contracts containing both lease and non-lease components, the Group allocates the consideration in the contract to the lease and the non-lease components based on their relative stand-alone prices. This mainly applies to the Group's time charter rental agreements of wellboats, where the service element of the contracts is a significant non-lease component. The non-lease component is excluded from the lease accounting and expensed directly in the income statement.
The Group has applied the lease recognition exemptions for short term lease contracts and low-value assets. Short terms leases represent lease agreements shorter than 12 months from the date of the contract. Low value assets represent lease agreements that are lower than NOK 50,000 each. Rent paid on non-recognised leases are presented in the note 23.
The group distinct between leases with credit institutions and leases with others. The distinction is shown in note on leases. Acquisition of right-of-use assets from leases with credit institutions is considered to be investments in new assets, while acquisition of right-of-use assets from others than credit institutions is not. This distinction is also applied on the debt side, and in the definition of NIBD. See note 23 for further information.
Assets that have an indefinite useful life are not subject to amortisation and are tested annually for impairment. Assets that are subject to amortisation are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount may not be recoverable. An impairment loss is recognised for the amount by which the asset's carrying amount exceeds its recoverable amount. The recoverable amount is the higher of an asset's fair value less costs to sell and value in use. For the purposes of assessing impairment, assets are grouped at the lowest levels for which there are separately identifiable cash flows (cashgenerating units). Non-financial assets, other than goodwill, that have been impaired are reviewed for possible reversal of the impairment at each reporting date.
The Group classifies its financial assets in the following categories: at fair value through profit or loss, loans and receivables, and available for sale. The classification depends on the purpose for which the financial assets were acquired. Management determines the classification of its financial assets at initial recognition.
Financial assets at fair value through profit or loss are financial assets held for trading. A financial asset is classified in this category if acquired principally for the purpose of selling in the short term. Derivatives are classified as held for trading (see section 'Derivative financial instruments and hedging activities'). Assets in this category are classified as current assets if expected to be settled within 12 months, otherwise they are classified as non-current.
Loans and receivables are non-derivative financial assets with fixed or determinable payments that are not quoted in an active market. They are included in current assets, except for maturities greater than 12 months after the end of the reporting period. These are classified as non-current assets. The Group's loans and receivables comprise 'trade and other receivables' and cash and
cash equivalents in the balance sheet (note 9).
Available-for-sale financial assets are non-derivatives that are either designated in this category or not classified in any of the other categories. They are included in non-current assets unless management intends to dispose of the investment within 12 months of the balance sheet date.
Regular purchases and sales of financial assets are recognised on the trade-date – the date on which the Group commits to purchase or sell the asset. Investments are initially recognised at fair value plus transaction costs for all financial assets not carried at fair value through profit or loss. Financial assets carried at fair value through profit and loss are initially recognised at fair value, and transaction costs are expensed in the income statement. Financial assets are derecognised when the rights to receive cash flows from the investments have expired or have been transferred and the Group has transferred substantially all risks and rewards of ownership. Available-for-sale financial assets and financial assets at fair value through profit or loss are subsequently carried at fair value.
Changes in the fair value of monetary securities denominated in a foreign currency and classified as available for sale are analysed between translation differences resulting from changes in amortised cost of the security and other changes in the carrying amount of the security. The translation differences on monetary securities are recognised in profit or loss; translation differences on nonmonetary securities are recognised in equity. Changes in the fair value of monetary and non-monetary securities classified as available for sale are recognised in other comprehensive income.
When securities classified as available for sale are sold or impaired, the accumulated fair value adjustments recognised in equity are included in the income statement as 'gains and losses from investment securities'.
Interest on available-for-sale securities calculated using the effective interest method is recognised in the income statement as part of other financial income. Dividends on available-for sale equity instruments are recognised in the income statement as part of other income when the Group's right to receive payments is established.
Financial assets and liabilities are offset and the net amount reported in the balance sheet when there is a legally enforceable right to offset the recognised amounts and there is an intention to settle on a net basis or realise the asset and settle the liability simultaneously. The legally enforceable right must not be contingent on future events and must be enforceable in the normal course of business and in the event of default, insolvency or bankruptcy of the company or the counterparty.
The fair values of quoted investments are based on current bid prices. If the market for a financial asset is not active (and for unlisted securities), the Group establishes fair value by using valuation techniques. These include the use of recent arm's length transactions, reference to other instruments that are substantially the same, discounted cash flow analysis, and option pricing models, making maximum use of market inputs and relying as little as possible on entity-specific inputs.
The Group assesses at each balance sheet date whether there is objective evidence that a financial asset or a Group of financial assets is impaired.
For debt securities, if any such evidence exists the cumulative loss – measured as the difference between the acquisition cost and the current fair value, less any impairment loss on that financial asset previously recognised in profit or loss – is removed from equity and recognised in profit or loss. If, in a subsequent period, the fair value of a debt instrument classified as available for sale increases and the increase can be objectively related to an event occurring after the impairment loss was recognised in profit or loss, the impairment loss is reversed through the consolidated income statement.
For equity investments, a significant or prolonged decline in the fair value of the security below its cost is also evidence that the assets are impaired. If any such evidence exists the cumulative loss – measured as the difference between the acquisition cost and the current fair value, less any impairment loss on that financial asset previously recognised in profit or loss – is removed from equity and recognised in profit or loss. Impairment losses recognised in the consolidated income statement on equity instruments are not reversed through the consolidated income statement.
Inventories are stated at the lower of cost and net realisable value. Cost is determined using the first-in, first-out (FIFO) method. The cost of finished goods and work in progress comprises raw materials, direct labour, other direct costs and related production overheads (based on normal operating capacity). It excludes borrowing costs. Net realisable value is the estimated selling price in the ordinary course of business, less applicable variable selling expenses.
The Group's biological assets comprise live fish, mainly salmon and trout, at all stages of the life cycle. The fish are divided into two main groups, depending on the stage of the life cycle. At the earliest stage of the life cycle, the fish are classified in group (1) roe, fry and juvenile fish. During this stage, the fish are kept on shore. When the fish are large enough for release to sea, they are classified in group (2) consumer products. The group for consumer products also comprises the subgroup for parent fish, utilised to produce roe. As this subgroup is immaterial, it is dealt with in the same way as other consumer products ready for harvest.
The stock of fish, in addition to salmon and trout, also comprises cleaner fish. This species of fish is utilised during production of salmon and trout as a means of eliminating salmon lice. Despite the significant volume of cleaner fish produced by the Group, both the volume and value of this species are relatively low and are immaterial for the consolidated financial statements. In order to simplify accounting, this species is therefore grouped with roe, fry and juvenile fish.
Biological assets are governed by IAS 41 Agriculture. The main rule is that biological assets shall be measured at fair value minus sales costs, unless fair value cannot be reliably measured. Measurement of fair value is regulated by IFRS 13. 'Fair value' refers to the price that would have been achieved on sale of the asset in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date under the prevailing market conditions.
For roe, fry and juvenile fish, in addition to cleaner fish, historical cost is deemed a reasonable approach to fair value, as there is little biological transformation (IAS 41.24). This assessment must be seen in light of the fact that smolt are currently released to sea at a stage when their weight is still relatively low. At the same time, this group comprises a limited share of the Group's biological assets measured in terms of both volume and value. If changes emerge in the future implying that the smolt produced are significantly larger when released to sea, a new assessment will be required.
For consumer products, the fair value is calculated by applying a present value model at level three in the fair value hierarchy in IFRS 13. For more detailed information on the fair value hierarchy, please refer to the note on financial instruments. In line with IFRS 13, the highest and best use of the biological assets is applied for the valuation. In accordance with the principle for highest and best use, the Group considers that the fish have optimal harvest weight when they have a live weight corresponding to 4 kg gutted weight. This corresponds to a live weight of 4.65 kg for salmon and 4.76 kg for trout. Fish with a live weight of that stated above or more are classified as ready for harvest (mature fish), while fish that have still not achieved this weight are classified as not ready for harvest (immature fish). For fish ready for harvest, the highest and best use is defined as harvesting and selling the fish as quickly as possible in the month following the balance sheet date. For fish not yet ready for harvest, the highest and best use is in principle defined as growing the fish to harvest weight, then harvesting and selling the fish. The harvest date applied in the valuation may however be brought forward if required by situations at a specific locality. Such situations may involve biological challenges (disease, salmon lice infestation etc.).
The cash flow-based present value model, is independent of historical and company-specific factors. On a hypothetical market with perfect competition, a hypothetical buyer of live fish would be willing to pay as a maximum the present value of the estimated future profit from the sale of the fish when it is ready for harvest. The estimated future profit, taking into account all price adjustments and payable fees until completion, constitutes the cash flow. No deductions are made for sales expenses, as these are not observable on the market. Such expenses are also deemed immaterial.
Incoming cash flow is calculated as a function of estimated volume multiplied by estimated price. For fish not ready for harvest, a deduction is made to cover estimated residual costs to grow the fish to harvest weight. The cash flow is discounted monthly by a discount rate. The discount rate comprises three main components: (1) the risk of incidents that have an effect on cash flow, (2) hypothetical licence lease and (3) the time value of money. Please refer to the note on significant accounting estimates and assessments for more detailed information on discounts, and sensitivity analysis.
Estimated biomass (volume) is based on the actual number of individuals in the sea on the balance sheet date, adjusted to cover projected mortality up to harvest date and multiplied by the estimated harvest weight per individual at the time of harvest. The measurement unit is the individual fish. However, for practical reasons, these estimates are carried out per locality. The live weight of fish in the sea is translated to gutted weight in order to arrive at the same measurement unit as for pricing.
Pricing is based on the Fish Pool forward prices. The reason for this is that there are no effective markets for the sale of live fish. Fish Pool is a market place for financial purchase and sale agreements for superior Norwegian salmon, size 3-6 kg gutted weight. Updated forward prices are published daily for harvested salmon on Fish Pool. The volume on Fish Pool is however limited. This market is therefore assessed to be insufficiently active and effective. Despite this, the Group is of the opinion that the observable forward prices must be seen as the best approach to a hypothetical price for the sale of salmon. The volume of trout sales in Norway is significantly lower, and there are no corresponding observable market prices. Historically, however, trout prices have been closely correlated to salmon prices. The forward prices for salmon are therefore applied as a starting point for estimates of the fair value of trout. The forward price for the month in which the fish is expected to be harvested is applied in order to estimate cash flow. The price stipulated by Fish Pool is adjusted to take into account export costs and clearing costs, and represents the reference price. This price is then adjusted to account for estimated harvesting cost (well boat, harvesting and boxing) and transport to Oslo. Adjustments are also made for any estimated differences in size and quality. The adjustments to the reference price are made per locality. Joint regional parameters are applied, unless factors specific to an individual locality require otherwise.
Changes to estimated fair value for biological assets, according to IAS 41, are recorded through profit or loss and presented on the line for fair value adjustments related to biological assets. The accounting line for fair value adjustments related to biological assets in the income statement comprises three elements; (1) change in fair value adjustment of stock of fish in sea, (2) change in fair value of onerous contracts and (3) change in fair value of unrealised gain/loss related to financial purchase and sale contracts for fish in Fish Pool.
Onerous contracts are contracts where the expenses of fulfilling the contracts are higher than the economic yield the company expects to gain by fulfilling the contracts. The Group enters into contracts related to future deliveries of salmon and trout. As biological assets are recognised at fair value, the fair value adjustment of the biological assets will be included in the estimated expenses required to fulfil the contract. As a result, physical delivery contracts where the contractual price is lower than the price on which fair value estimation of the biological assets was based will be defined as onerous contracts according to IAS 37, even if the contractual price is higher than the production costs for the products. At the end of the period, the management will evaluate whether contracts are onerous contracts by estimating the value of the commitment per contract. This evaluation is based on a number of premises and estimates. The estimate includes all contracts involving the sale of salmon and trout, where the fish have been produced by the Group. For contracts where the product to be delivered has a higher degree of processing than gutted fish, the contractual price is converted to a price per kilo gutted weight based on estimated yield for the different product types and normal processing costs in accordance with the Group's calculations. All contractual prices are translated to Norwegian kroner. For contracts that contain different product types, a weighted price is estimated. The weighted price per contract is then compared with an estimated benchmark price per month. This price corresponds to the price applied as a starting point for valuation of the biological assets, and is based on forward prices from Fish Pool, adjusted for export margin and transport from fish farm to Oslo. A provision is recognised on the balance sheet. The provision is classified as other short-term debt.
As the financial statements also present production costs for the stock of live fish, the reporting of mortality is of significance. Costs related to abnormal mortality are immediately recognised through profit or loss and presented on the line for changes in inventory, while normal waste is classified as part of production costs. Fair value of biological assets is not affected by the principle for reporting mortality costs. The extent to which mortality is normal or abnormal requires assessment. The Group makes use of a common indicator and threshold for all farming units. If in one month mortality at a locality exceeds 1.5% of the incoming number of fish at the locality, this is classified as an indication of abnormal mortality. A more detailed assessment is then carried out to establish whether mortality is abnormal. These assessments take into account the cause of mortality and the size of the fish. Please refer to the note on biological assets for a more detailed description of mortality costs and incidents that have caused abnormal mortality.
Accounts receivable are measured at fair value on the transaction date, and will usually correspond to the nominal value of the receivable. On subsequent measurement, accounts receivable are valued at nominal value minus provisions for loss. Provisions for loss are recognised when there are objective indications that the Group will not receive settlement in accordance with the original terms. Significant financial difficulties of the debtor, probability that the debtor will enter bankruptcy or financial reorganisation, and default or delinquency in payments are considered indicators that the account receivable is impaired.
The amount of the provision is the difference between the asset's carrying amount and the present value of estimated future cash flows, discounted at the effective interest rate. The amount of the provision is recognised in the income statement within 'other operating expenses'. When a trade receivable is uncollectable, it is written off against the allowance account for trade receivables. Subsequent recoveries of amounts previously written off are credited against 'selling and marketing costs' in the income statement.
Cash and cash equivalents includes cash in hand, deposits held at call with banks, other short-term highly liquid investments with original maturities of three months or less, and bank overdrafts. Bank overdrafts are shown within borrowings in current liabilities on the balance sheet.
Ordinary shares are classified as equity. Incremental costs directly attributable to the issue of new shares or options are shown in equity as a deduction, net of tax, from the proceeds.
Where any Group company purchases the company's equity share capital (treasury shares), the consideration paid, including any directly attributable incremental costs (net of income taxes) is deducted from equity attributable to the company's equity holders until the shares are cancelled or reissued. Where such ordinary shares are subsequently reissued, any consideration received, net of any directly attributable incremental transaction costs and the related income tax effects, is included in equity attributable to the company's equity holders.
Group companies operate various pension schemes. The schemes are generally funded through payments to insurance companies or trustee-administered funds, determined by periodic actuarial calculations. The schemes are either a defined benefit plan or a defined contribution plan.
A defined contribution plan is a pension plan under which the Group pays fixed contributions into a separate entity. The Group has no legal or constructive obligations to pay further contributions if the fund does not hold sufficient assets to pay all employees the benefits relating to employee service in the current and prior periods.
A defined benefit plan is a pension plan that is not a defined contribution plan. Typically, defined benefit plans define an amount of pension benefit that an employee will receive on retirement, usually dependent on one or more factors such as age, years of service and compensation.
The liability recognised in the balance sheet in respect of defined benefit pension plans is the present value of the defined benefit obligation at the reporting period date less the fair value of plan assets. The defined benefit obligation is calculated annually by independent actuaries using the projected unit credit method. The present value of the defined benefit obligation is determined by discounting the estimated future cash outflows using interest rates of high-quality corporate bonds that are denominated in the currency in which the benefits will be paid and that have terms to maturity approximating to the terms of the related pension liability.
Actuarial gains and losses arising from experience adjustments and changes in actuarial assumptions are charged or credited to equity in other comprehensive income in the period in which they arise.
Termination benefits are payable when employment is terminated by the Group before the normal retirement date, or whenever an employee accepts voluntary redundancy in exchange for these benefits. The Group recognises termination benefits when it is demonstrably committed to either terminating the employment of current employees according to a detailed formal plan without possibility of withdrawal; or providing termination benefits as a result of an offer made to encourage voluntary redundancy. Benefits falling due more than 12 months after the balance sheet date are discounted to present value.
Borrowings are recognised initially at fair value, net of transaction costs incurred.
Borrowings are classified as current liabilities unless the Group has an unconditional right to defer settlement of the liability for at least 12 months after the balance sheet date.
Borrowing costs incurred for the construction of any qualifying asset are capitalised during the period of time that is required to complete and prepare the asset for its intended use. Other borrowing costs are expensed.
Provisions (for e.g. environmental improvements, restructuring and legal claims) are recognised when:
Provisions for restructuring costs comprise termination fees for lease contracts and severance pay for employees. No provisions are made for future operating losses.
If several liabilities of the same character exist, the probability of settlement being made is determined for the liabilities as a group. Provisions for the group of liabilities are recognised even if the probability of settlement related to the individual liabilities in the group may be low.
Provisions are measured as the current value of expected payments required to clear the liability. A discount rate is applied before tax that reflects the current market situation and the specific risk for the liability. Any increase in a liability caused by a change in time value is recognised as a financial expense.
Dividend distribution to the Company's shareholders is recognised as a liability in the Group's financial statements when the dividends are approved by the Company's shareholders.
Derivative financial instruments are registered in the balance sheet at fair value at the time of contract and are subsequently adjusted to current fair values. Registration of associated gains/losses depends on whether the derivative is regarded as a hedging instrument, and if so, what type of hedging. The Group classifies derivatives as either a) hedges of fair value of recognised assets or liabilities of a firm commitment (fair value hedge); or b) hedges of a particular risk associated with a recognised asset or liability or a highly probable forecast transaction (cash flow hedge).
The Group documents at the inception of the transaction the relationship between hedging instruments and hedged items, as well as its risk management objectives and strategy for undertaking various hedging transactions. The Group also documents its assessment, both at hedge inception and on the ongoing basis, of whether the derivatives that are used in hedging transactions are highly effective in offsetting changes in fair values or cash flows of hedged items.
Fair values of derivative instruments used for hedging are disclosed in Note 12. Fair value of a hedging derivative is classified as fixed assets or long-term liability if the hedging object matures in more than 12 months, and as current assets or short-term liabilities if the hedging object matures in less than 12 months.
Changes in the fair value of derivatives that are designated and qualify as fair value hedges are recorded in the income statement, together with any changes in the fair value of the hedged asset or liability that are attributable to the hedged risk. The Group only applies fair value hedge accounting for hedging fixed interest risk on borrowings. The gain or loss relating to the effective portion of interest rate swaps hedging fixed rate borrowings is recognised in the income statement within 'finance costs'. The gain or loss relating to the ineffective portion is recognised in the income statement within 'other gains/(losses) – net'. Changes in the fair value of the hedge fixed rate borrowings attributable to interest rate risk are recognised in the income statement within 'finance costs'.
If the hedge no longer meets the criteria for hedge accounting, the adjustment to the carrying amount of a hedged item for which the effective interest method is used is amortised to profit or loss over the period to maturity.
The effective portion of changes in the fair value of derivatives that are designated and qualify as cash flow hedges is recognised in other comprehensive income. The gain or loss relating to the ineffective portion is recognised immediately in the income statement within 'other gains/(losses) – net'.
Amounts accumulated in equity are reclassified to profit or loss in the periods when the hedged item affects profit or loss (for example, when the forecast sale that is hedged takes place). The gain or loss relating to the effective portion of interest rate swaps hedging variable rate borrowings is recognised in the income statement within 'finance income/cost'. However, when the forecast transaction that is hedged results in the recognition of a nonfinancial asset, the gains and losses previously deferred in equity are transferred from equity and included in the initial measurement of the cost of the asset. The deferred amounts are ultimately recognised in cost of goods sold in the case of inventory or in depreciation in the case of fixed assets.
When a hedging instrument expires or is sold, or when a hedge no longer meets the criteria for hedge accounting, any cumulative gain or loss existing in equity at that time remains in equity and is recognised when the forecast transaction is ultimately recognised in the income statement. When a forecast transaction is no longer expected to occur, the cumulative gain or loss that was reported in equity is immediately transferred to the income statement within 'other gains/(losses) – net'.
Contingent liabilities are defined as
Contingent liabilities are not recognised in the annual financial statements apart from contingent liabilities which are acquired through the acquisition of an entity. Significant contingent liabilities are disclosed, with the exception of contingent liabilities where the probability of the liability occurring is remote.
Contingent liabilities acquired upon the purchase of operations are recognised at fair value even if the liability is not probable. The assessment of probability and fair value is subject to constant review. Changes in the fair value are recognised in the income statement.
A contingent asset is not recognised in the financial statements, but is disclosed if there is a certain level of probability that a benefit will accrue to the Group.
The Group's cash flow statement shows the overall cash flow broken down to operating, investing and financing activities. The cash flow is reported on the basis of the indirect method. The cash flow statement illustrates the effect of the various activities on cash and cash equivalents. Cash flows resulting from the disposal of operations are presented under investing activities.
New information after the reporting period concerning the Group's financial position at the reporting date is considered in the financial statements. An event after the reporting period that does not affect the Group's financial position on the reporting date, but will affect the Group's financial position in the future is reported where material.
Earnings per share is calculated by the profit attributable to equity holders of the company of the result for the period being divided by a time-weighted average of ordinary shares for the period.
Diluted earnings per share is calculated by adjusting the weighted average number of ordinary shares outstanding to assume conversion of all dilutive potential ordinary shares.
Annual report 2021 Austevoll Seafood ASA
PAGE 140 STATEMENT OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME PAGE 141 STATEMENT OF FINANCIAL POSITION PAGE 142 STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN EQUITY PAGE 143 CASH FLOW STATEMENT PAGE 144 NOTES TO THE ACCOUNTS

| TABLE OF CONTENTS | PAGE |
|---|---|
| Statement of Comprehensive Income | 140 |
| Statement of financial position | 141 |
| Statement of changes in equity | 142 |
| Cash flow statement | 143 |
| Notes to the accounts | |
| NOTE 1 GENERAL | 144 |
| NOTE 2 FINANCIAL RISK MANAGEMENT | 144 |
| NOTE 3 INCOME | 145 |
| NOTE 4 PAYROLL, FEES, NO. OF EMPLOYEES ETC | 145 |
| NOTE 5 FINANCIAL INCOME AND FINANCIAL EXPENSES | 146 |
| NOTE 6 FIXED ASSETS | 147 |
| NOTE 7 SHARES IN SUBSIDIARIES | 148 |
| NOTE 8 SHARES IN ASSOCIATED COMPANIES | 149 |
| NOTE 9 INVESTMENTS IN OTHER SHARES | 149 |
| NOTE 10 OTHER RECEIVABLES | 150 |
| NOTE 11 TRADE RECEIVABLES | 150 |
| NOTE 12 RESTRICTED CASH DEPOSITS | 151 |
| NOTE 13 TAX | 151 |
| NOTE 14 INTEREST BEARING DEBT | 153 |
| NOTE 15 OTHER CURRENT LIABILITIES | 154 |
| NOTE 16 RELATED PARTIES | 154 |
| NOTE 17 EARNINGS PER SHARE AND DIVIDEND PER SHARE | 155 |
| NOTE 18 ACCOUNTING PRINCIPLES | 156 |
| Amounts in NOK 1,000 | Note | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Operating revenue | 3,16 | 1,884 | 2,052 |
| Total income | 1,884 | 2,052 | |
| Wages and salaries | 4,15 | -20,791 | -20,107 |
| Other operating expenses | 4,16 | -14,240 | -14,218 |
| Operating expenses | -35,031 | -34,325 | |
| Depreciation | 6 | -4 | -4 |
| Operating profit | -33,151 | -32,277 | |
| Financial income | 5 | 976,563 | 810,024 |
| Financial expenses | 5 | -32,683 | -50,188 |
| Profit before tax | 910,729 | 727,558 | |
| Tax | 13 | 0 | 0 |
| Profit for the year | 910,729 | 727,558 | |
| Average no. of outstanding shares | 201,824,074 | 201,824,074 | |
| Earnings per share/diluted earnings per share (NOK) | 4.51 | 3.60 | |
| Proposed dividend per share (NOK) | 4.50 | 3.50 |
| Amounts in NOK 1,000 | Note | 31.12.2021 | 31.12.2020 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Assets | |||
| Fixed assets | 6 | 6 | 10 |
| Shares in subsidiaries | 7,14 | 3,818,808 | 3,818,808 |
| Investments in associates | 8 | 752,718 | 752,718 |
| Investments in other companies | 9 | 25,736 | 25,736 |
| Long-term receivables on Group companies | 10,16 | 64,134 | 171,481 |
| Total non-current assets | 4,661,402 | 4,768,752 | |
| Trade receivables | 11,14,16 | 61 | 756 |
| Short-term receivables on Group companies | 14,16 | 919,375 | 777,510 |
| Other receivables | 10 | 1,593 | 1,509 |
| Liquid assets | 12,14 | 357,629 | 743,462 |
| Total current assets | 1,278,659 | 1,523,236 | |
| Total assets | 5,940,060 | 6,291,988 | |
| Equity and liabilities | |||
| Share capital | 16 CFS* | 101,359 | 101,359 |
| Treasury shares | -447 | -447 | |
| Share premium | 3,147,600 | 3,147,600 | |
| Retained earnings | 1,146,216 | 1,143,695 | |
| Total equity | 4,394,728 | 4,392,207 | |
| Borrowings | 14,16 | 553,645 | 666,558 |
| Total non-current liabilities | 553,645 | 666,558 | |
| Liabilities to credit institutions | 14 | 71,500 | 513,016 |
| Trade payables | 16 | 5,378 | 6,013 |
| Accrued salary and public duties payable | 3,849 | 3,523 | |
| Provision for dividends | 17 | 908,208 | 706,384 |
| Other current liabilities | 15,16 | 2,751 | 4,286 |
| Total current liabilities | 991,687 | 1,233,223 | |
| Total liabilities | 1,545,332 | 1,899,781 | |
| Total equity and liabilities | 5,940,060 | 6,291,988 |
If note reference contains the characters CFS, it refers to notes in the consolidated financial statement.
Helge Singelstad Chairman
Hege Solbakken Board member
Siren M. Grønhaug
Board member
Storebø, 22nd of April 2022 Board of Austevoll Seafood ASA
Helge Møgster Board member
Eirik Drønen Melingen Board member
Arne Møgster CEO & President
Hege Charlotte Bakken Deputy Chairman
Lill Maren Møgster Board member
| Amounts in NOK 1,000 | Note | Share capital |
Treasury shares |
Share premium |
Retained earnings |
Total equity |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equity at 01.01.2020 | 101,359 | -447 | 3,147,600 | 1,120,287 | 4,368,799 | |
| Profit for the year | 0 | 0 | 0 | 727,558 | 727,558 | |
| Total comprehensive income | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Total comprehensive income for the year | 0 | 0 | 0 | 727,558 | 727,558 | |
| Provision for dividends | 17 | 0 | 0 | 0 | -706,384 | -706,384 |
| Reversed dividends payable on treasury shares | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2,233 | 2,233 | |
| Total equity to/from shareholders in the period | 0 | 0 | 0 | -704,151 | -704,151 | |
| Total change in equity | 0 | 0 | 0 | 23,407 | 23,407 | |
| Equity at 31.12.2020 | 101,359 | -447 | 3,147,600 | 1,143,694 | 4,392,207 | |
| Changes charged to equity | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Profit for the year | 0 | 0 | 0 | 910,729 | 910,729 | |
| Total comprehensive income | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Total comprehensive income for the year | 0 | 0 | 0 | 910,729 | 910,729 | |
| Provision for dividends | 17 | 0 | 0 | 0 | -912,228 | -912,228 |
| Reversed dividends payable on treasury shares | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4,020 | 4,020 | |
| Total equity to/from shareholders in the period | 0 | 0 | 0 | -908,208 | -908,208 | |
| Total change in equity | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2,521 | 2,521 | |
| Equity at 31.12.2021 | 101,359 | -447 | 3,147,600 | 1,146,216 | 4,394,728 |
| Amounts in NOK 1,000 Note |
2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|
| Profit before tax | 910,729 | 727,558 |
| Depreciation and amortisation 6 |
4 | 4 |
| Dividends and Group contributions 5 |
-956,240 | -793,883 |
| Change in trade receivables | 694 | 239 |
| Change in trade payables | -635 | 362 |
| Change in other accruals | -124 | -1,843 |
| Net interest income/expenses recognised | 19,999 | 31,235 |
| Net cash flow from operating activities | -25,573 | -36,328 |
| Change in intercompany receivables | 209,169 | -61,110 |
| Dividends and Group contributions received | 769,970 | 681,827 |
| Interest received | 9,419 | 13,146 |
| Net cash flow from investing activities | 988,559 | 633,863 |
| Net change in long-term interest bearing debt | -613,000 | -33,762 |
| Net change in short-term interest bearing debt | -16 | -136 |
| Interest paid | -29,418 | -44,381 |
| Dividends paid 17 |
-706,384 | -504,560 |
| Net cash flow from financing activities | -1,348,818 | -582,839 |
| Change in cash and cash equivalents | -385,833 | 14,696 |
| Liquid assets at 01.01. | 743,462 | 728,766 |
| Liquid assets at 31.12. | 357,629 | 743,462 |
| Consists of | ||
| Bank deposits etc. | 357,629 | 743,462 |
| Of which restricted cash deposits | 2,879 | 2,621 |
| Unutilised long term credit facility | 590,000 | 490,000 |
The separate financial statements of Austevoll Seafood ASA (parent company) have been prepared in accordance with simplified IFRS. Preparation of separate financial statements is required by law.
The company is a subsidiary of Laco AS (Austevoll municipality), and is consolidated in Laco AS' consolidated financial statements, which are available from Laco AS.
All amounts are in NOK thousands (TNOK), if not specified differently.
The Company's activities expose it to a variety of financial risks: market risk (including currency risk, price risk, cash flow and fair value interest rate risk), credit risk, liquidity risk and cash flow interest rate risk.
The Company's overall risk management programme focuses on the unpredictability of financial markets and seeks to minimise potential adverse effects on the Company's financial performance. The Company uses to some degree derivative financial instruments to reduce certain risk exposures.
The Company is exposed to price risk because of investments held by the Company and classified on the consolidated balance sheet either as available-for-sale or at fair value through profit or loss. The company do not use financial instruments to manage its financial risk for non-current liabilities.
The Company's interest rate risk mainly arises from long-term borrowings. Borrowings issued at variable rates expose the Company to cash flow interest rate risk.
Prudent liquidity risk management implies maintaining sufficient cash and marketable securities, the availability of funding through an adequate amount of committed credit facilities and the ability to close out market positions.
Management monitors rolling forecasts of the Company's liquidity reserve (comprises undrawn borrowing facility) and cash and cash equivalents on the basis of expected cash flow.
For information of the Company`s financial liabilities see note 14.
The Companys objectives when managing capital are to safeguard the Companys ability to continue as a going concern in order to provide returns for shareholders and benefits for other stakeholders and to maintain an optimal capital structure to reduce the cost of capital.
In order to maintain or adjust the capital structure, the Company may adjust the amount of dividends paid to shareholders, return capital to shareholders, issue new shares or sell assets to reduce debt.
| 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|
| Total borrowings (note 14) | 628,919 | 1,184,516 |
| Minus liquid assets and interest-bearing assets | 499,835 | 997,130 |
| Net loans | 129,084 | 187,387 |
| Total equity | 4,394,728 | 4,392,207 |
| Capital employed | 4,523,812 | 4,579,594 |
| Gearing ratio | 3% | 4% |
The carrying value less impairment provision of trade receivables and payables are assumed to approximate their fair values. The fair value of financial liabilities for disclosure purposes is estimated by discounting the future contractual cash flows at the current market interest rate that is available to the Company for similar financial instruments.
| 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|
| Administrative services | 1,884 | 2,052 |
| Total operating revenue | 1,884 | 2,052 |
| Revenue by geographic area | ||
| Norway | 75 | 53 |
| Peru | 1,809 | 1,948 |
| Chile | 0 | 51 |
| Total | 1,884 | 2,052 |
| 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|
| Salaries and holiday pay | 14,585 | 13,818 |
| Contract labour | 3,406 | 3,726 |
| National insurance contribution | 2,178 | 1,975 |
| Pension costs | 512 | 490 |
| Other payments | 110 | 98 |
| Total wages and salaries | 20,791 | 20,107 |
| Average number of full-time equivalents | 3 | 3 |
All employees have a defined contribution pension scheme.
Accumulated expenses for wages, pension premiums and other remuneration to CEO, other executives and members of the parent company's board is presented in the consolidated financial statements.
The annual Director's fee to the Chairman of the Board is not paid as taxable remuneration. AUSS is invoiced for the Chairman's services and for consultancy fees by Group head entity, Laco AS, where the company's Chairman is employed.
No loans or securities have been issued in 2021 or 2020 to the CEO, board members, members of the corporate management or other employees or closely related parties.
The CEO has a term of notice of 3 months. On resignation, the CEO has no right to extra compensation. Pension age is 70, and the CEO takes part in the defined contribution scheme.
See note 20 in Group notes for guidelines to executive management and remunerations to the company`s officers.
| 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|
| Specification of auditor's fee | ||
| Statutory audit | 1,374 | 1,535 |
| Other services excl. audit | 929 | 756 |
| Technical assistance, taxation | 302 | 0 |
| Total | 2,604 | 2,291 |
| 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|
| Interest income from Group companies | 3,632 | 4,020 |
| Other interest income | 5,787 | 9,126 |
| Recognised dividends and Group contributions | 956,240 | 793,883 |
| Other financial income | 0 | 625 |
| Foreign exchange gains | 10,904 | 2,370 |
| Total financial income | 976,563 | 810,024 |
| Interest expenses from Group companies | 1,725 | 1,257 |
| Other interest expenses | 27,693 | 43,125 |
| Foreign exchange losses | 266 | 2,624 |
| Other financial expenses | 2,999 | 3,183 |
| Total financial expenses | 32,683 | 50,188 |
| Net financial items | 943,880 | 759,835 |
| Office | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2020 | equipment | Total |
| At 01.01. | ||
| Acquisition cost | 2,321 | 2,321 |
| Accumulated depreciation | -2,307 | -2,307 |
| Carrying amount at 01.01. | 14 | 14 |
| Depreciation | -4 | -4 |
| Carrying amount at 31.12. | 10 | 10 |
| At 31.12. | ||
| Acquisition cost | 2,321 | 2,321 |
| Accumulated depreciation | -2,311 | -2,311 |
| Carrying amount at 31.12. | 10 | 10 |
| Office | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2021 | equipment | Total |
| Carrying amount at 01.01. | 10 | 10 |
| Depreciation | -4 | -4 |
| Carrying amount at 31.12. | 6 | 6 |
| At 31.12. | ||
| Acquisition cost | 2,321 | 2,321 |
| Accumulated depreciation | -2,315 | -2,315 |
| Carrying amount at 31.12. | 6 | 6 |
| Voting share | Group | Main business | Net profit | Equity Carrying value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 52.69% | x | Farming, Wildcatch, VAP, sales and distribution |
2,781,096 | 19,323,102 | 2,783,350 |
| 100.00% | Ownership in Austral Group S.A.A. | 15,549 | 371,616 | 25,336 | |
| 100.00% | Ownership in Foodcorp Chile SA | 30,337 | 109,983 | 660,100 | |
| 26.39% | Processing plant | 107,067 | 974,380 | 58,709 | |
| 55.24% | x | Farming (Atlantic salmon) | -13,739 | 310,107 | 123,101 |
| 42.92% | x | Pelagic wild catch operation | 60,431 | 392,391 | 110,475 |
| 100.00% | Property, plant, offices | 5,659 | 9,458 | 56,627 | |
| 100.00% | Processing plant | 4,139 | 8,010 | 100 | |
| 100.00% | Service company | 862 | 2,462 | 1,010 | |
| 3,818,808 | |||||
| Gross numbers (100%) |
| 2020 - Subsidiaries | Gross numbers (100%) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Company | Voting share | Group | Main business | Net profit | Equity Carrying value | |
| Lerøy Seafood Group ASA | 52.69% | x | Farming, Wildcatch, VAP, sales and distribution |
790,209 | 17,632,768 | 2,783,350 |
| Austevoll Pacific AS | 100.00% | Ownership in Austral Group S.A.A. | -1,833 | 365,178 | 25,336 | |
| A-Fish AS | 100.00% | Ownership in Foodcorp Chile SA | -1,658 | 79,647 | 660,100 | |
| Foodcorp Chile S.A. * | 26.39% | Processing plant | 69,184 | 884,870 | 58,709 | |
| Br. Birkeland Farming AS | 55.24% | x | Farming (Atlantic salmon) | -56,877 | 334,242 | 123,101 |
| Br. Birkeland AS | 42.92% | x | Pelagic wild catch operation | 53,480 | 441,847 | 110,475 |
| Austevoll Eiendom AS | 100.00% | Property, plant, offices | 4,551 | 9,370 | 56,627 | |
| Austevoll Laksepakkeri AS | 100.00% | Processing plant | 12,007 | 8,167 | 100 | |
| AUSS Shared Service AS | 100.00% | Service company | 728 | 2,415 | 1,010 | |
| Total | 3,818,808 |
* AUSS owns 100% of Foodcorp Chile S.A., 26.39 % directly and 73.61% via A-Fish AS.
All subsidiaries follow the same accounting year as AUSS.
| 2021 Gross numbers (100%) |
||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Company | Classification of investment | Net profit | Equity Registered office Carrying value | Voting share | ||
| Marin IT AS | Associate | 4,166 | 26,167 Storebø | 4,003 | 25.00 % | |
| Pelagia Holding konsern | Joint venture | 564,622 | 3,167,918 Bergen | 748,715 | 50.00 % | |
| Total | 752,718 |
| 2020 Gross numbers (100%) |
||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Company | Classification of investment | Net profit | Equity Registered office Carrying value | Voting share | ||
| Marin IT AS | Associate | 2,598 | 22,367 Storebø | 4,003 | 25.00 % | |
| Pelagia Holding konsern | Joint venture | 254,960 | 2,729,608 Bergen | 748,715 | 50.00 % | |
| Total | 752,718 |
Shares in associated companies and joint ventures are estimated to original cost price in Parent company. In the Group these shares are estimated to equity method.
| 2021 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Company | Registered office | Number of shares | Owner/voting shares | Fair value |
| Euro-Terminal AS | Bergen | 4,897,290 | 16.7% | 25,711 |
| Other shares | 25 | |||
| Total | 25,736 | |||
2020 Company Registered office Number of shares Owner/voting shares Fair value Euro-Terminal AS Bergen 4,897,290 16.7% 25,711 Other shares 25 Total 25,736
| 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|
| Non-current receivables | ||
| Intragroup non-current receivables | 64,134 | 171,481 |
| Total non-current receivables at 31.12. | 64,134 | 171,481 |
| Other current receivables | ||
| Prepayments | 405 | 349 |
| Public fees receivable | 1,188 | 1,160 |
| Other current receivables at 31.12. | 1,593 | 1,509 |
| 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|
| Trade receivables | 61 | 756 |
| Accounts receivables at 31.12. | 61 | 756 |
| Age distribution of trade receivables | ||
| 0 to 3 months | 61 | 756 |
| Total | 61 | 756 |
| Carrying amounts of trade receivables | ||
| Currency | ||
| NOK | 61 | 756 |
| Total | 61 | 756 |
| 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|
| Restricted deposits related to employee tax deduction | 2,879 | 2,621 |
| Total | 2,879 | 2,621 |
| 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|
| Tax for the year is as follows | ||
| Change in deferred tax/tax asset | -18,854 | 723 |
| Deferred tax asset not recognised in the SOFP | 18,854 | -723 |
| Change in deferred tax asset, prior years | 0 | 0 |
| Tax | 0 | 0 |
| Tax reconciliation | ||
| Profit before tax | 910,729 | 727,558 |
| Tax calculated using the nominal tax rate | 200,360 | 160,063 |
| Other differences - including dividends | -219,215 | -159,340 |
| Change in deferred tax asset not recognised in the SOFP | 18,854 | -723 |
| Change in deferred tax asset, prior years | 0 | 0 |
| Tax expense | 0 | 0 |
| Effective tax rate | 0% | 0% |
| 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|
| Change in deferred tax | ||
| Carrying amount at 01.01. | 0 | 0 |
| Change for the year | -18,854 | 723 |
| Reversal change for the year | 18,854 | -723 |
| Carrying amount at 31.12. | 0 | 0 |
| Non-current | Loss carried | Other | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| assets | Liabilities | Pensions | forward | differences | Total | |
| Change in deferred tax | ||||||
| 2020 | ||||||
| Carrying amount at 01.01. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Recognised in the period | -77 | 0 | 0 | -404 | 1,204 | 723 |
| At 31.12. (tax rate 22%) | -77 | 0 | 0 | -404 | 1,204 | 723 |
| Deferred tax asset not recognised in the SOFP | 77 | 0 | 0 | 404 | -1,204 | -723 |
| At 31.12. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 2021 | ||||||
| Recognised in the period | -62 | 0 | 0 | 977 | -19,769 | -18,854 |
| At 31.12. (tax rate 22%) | -62 | 0 | 0 | 977 | -19,769 | -18,854 |
| Deferred tax asset not recognised in the SOFP | 62 | 0 | 0 | -977 | 19,769 | 18,854 |
| At 31.12. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 2021 | 2020 | Changes | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Specification of temporary differences | |||
| Non-current assets | 1,146 | 1,428 | -283 |
| Shares | 24,408 | 113,101 | -88,693 |
| Liabilities | 3,774 | 4,942 | -1,168 |
| Loss carried forward | -463,915 | -468,356 | 4,442 |
| Total temporary differences | -434,588 | -348,886 | -85,702 |
| Deferred tax asset not recognised in the SOFP | -95,609 | -76,755 | -18,854 |
Austevoll Seafood ASA and Austevoll Eiendom AS have joint and several liability for short-term credit facilities.
| 2021 | 2020 | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net interest-bearing debt | |||||||
| Liabilities to credit institutions - non-current | 10,000 | 181,500 | |||||
| Bond loans - non-current * | 490,000 | 490,000 | |||||
| Other interest-bearing liabilities - non-current | 57,419 | 0 | |||||
| Current share of non-current liabilities | 71,500 | 513,000 | |||||
| Overdraft facility | 0 | 16 | |||||
| Total interest-bearing debt | 628,919 | 1,184,516 | |||||
| Liquid assets | 357,629 | 743,462 | |||||
| Cash pool receivables | 78,072 | 82,187 | |||||
| Other interest-bearing assets | 64,134 | 171,481 | |||||
| Net interest-bearing assets/debt (-) | -129,084 | -187,387 | |||||
| Limit overdraft facility | 50,000 | 50,000 | |||||
| Average interest bond loans | 2.80 % | 4.06 % | |||||
| Interim interest regulations on bond loans | |||||||
| 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 | Subsequent | Total * | |
| Repayment profile | |||||||
| Debt to credit institutions | 71,500 | 0 | 0 | 10,000 | 0 | 0 | 81,500 |
| Bond loans | 0 | 490,000 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 490,000 |
| Total | 71,500 | 490,000 | 0 | 10,000 | 0 | 0 | 571,500 |
* Non-current liabilities are reduced with provision paid with loan rising. The provision is accrued between the term of loans, and was per 31.12.2021 TNOK 3,774.
Financial covenant requirements for AUSS (the parent company) are measured on the Group`s consolidated level, and requires a minimum book equity ratio of 30% and a debt service ratio not less than 1.05. The book equity ratio in the Group per 31.12.2021 was 58% and per 31.12.2020 it was 58%.
| 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|
| Liabilities secured by mortgage | ||
| Current liabilities | 71,500 | 13,016 |
| Non-current liabilities | 0 | 71,500 |
| Liabilities to credit institutions incl. leasing liab. | 71,500 | 84,516 |
| Assets provided as security | ||
| Shares in Br. Birkeland AS and Br. Birkeland Farming AS | 233,576 | 233,576 |
| Trade receivables and other receivables | 61 | 756 |
| Total assets provided as security | 233,637 | 234,332 |
Based on contractual terms of non-current borrowings (excl. bond loan), the fair value of the loans is estimated to be equal to book value as of 31.12.2021. For further information about the bond loan, please refer to note 17 in the consolidated financial statement.
| 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|
| Specification of other current liabilities | ||
| Wages and salaries | 887 | 883 |
| Interest payments due | 1,778 | 3,346 |
| Other current liabilities | 86 | 56 |
| Total other current liabilities | 2,751 | 4,286 |
| Operating revenue | Operating expenses | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 2020 | 2021 | 2020 | |
| Relationship | ||||
| Subsidiaries | 1,874 | 1,999 | 4,245 | 4,570 |
| Associates | 0 | 0 | 634 | 583 |
| Owners and their related parties | 5 | 0 | 5,310 | 5,836 |
| Total | 1,879 | 1,999 | 10,189 | 10,988 |
| Trade receivables | Trade payables | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 2020 | 2021 | 2020 | |
| Relationship | ||||
| Subsidiaries | 56 | 51 | -394 | -294 |
| Owners and their related parties | 5 | 0 | -4,258 | -5,325 |
| Total | 61 | 51 | -4,652 | -5,619 |
| Other current receivables | Non-current receivables | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 2020 | 2021 | 2020 | |
| Relationship | ||||
| Subsidiaries | 919,375 | 777,510 | 64,134 | 171,481 |
| Total | 919,375 | 777,510 | 64,134 | 171,481 |
| Other current liabilities | Non-current liabilities | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 2020 | 2021 | 2020 | |
| Relationship | ||||
| Subsidiaries | 0 | 0 | 57,419 | 0 |
| Total | 0 | 0 | 57,419 | 0 |
Møgster Management AS is owned by the company's major shareholder, Laco AS, and delivers administrative services (legal advice, catering, secretary, accounting) to the company. Marin IT AS delivers IT services, and is owned 25% by AUSS.
In 2021 the company paid TNOK 4,245 (2020: TNOK 4,570) to subsidiaries mainly for administrative services.
Basic earnings per share are calculated by dividing the profit attributable to equity holders of the company by the weighted average number of ordinary shares issued during the year.
| 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|
| Calculation of earnings per share | ||
| Profit for the year | 910,729 | 727,558 |
| No. of shares at 31.12. (1,000) | 202,717 | 202,717 |
| Average no. of shares less treasury shares (1,000) | 201,824 | 201,824 |
| Earnings per share - all shares (NOK) | 4.49 | 3.59 |
| Earnings per share/diluted earnings per share (NOK) | 4.51 | 3.60 |
| Proposed dividend per share (NOK) | 4.50 | 3.50 |
The principal accounting policies applied in the preparation of the separate financial statements are set out below. These policies have been consistently applied to all the years presented, unless otherwise stated.
The statutory accounts have been prepared in accordance to the Regulations of 21st of January 2008 regarding "simplified" IFRS as determined by the Ministry of Finance. The separate financial statements of AUSS (Company) were approved by the board of Directors of AUSS 22nd of April 2022. Preparation of separate financial statements for the parent company is required by law.
The separate financial statements have been prepared under the historical cost convention, with the following modification below:
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with simplified IFRS requires the use of certain critical accounting estimates. It also requires management to exercise its judgement in the process of applying the Company's accounting policies. The areas involving a higher degree of judgement or complexity, or areas where assumptions and estimates are significant to the separate financial statements are disclosed in note 2 in the consolidated financial statements.
For a description of new standards and interpretations and amendments to existing standards, please refer to note 28 in the consolidated financial statements.
Investment in subsidiaries, joint ventures and associates are accounted for at cost.
The fair value of the company's investments in subsidiaries, joint ventures and associated companies may vary over time, and is therefore reviewed for potential impairment. Fair value assessment will be affected by many factors, such as expectations of future earnings, specific branch conditions, owner shares, shareholder structure, but also macro conditions which are not directly related to the individual company. For quoted investments, current bid prices will be considered as one of several objective criteria in the fair value assessment. If the impairment test indicates that fair value is significantly lower than carrying amount and the situation is expected to persist, an impairment loss is recognised for the amount the carrying value exceeds the recoverable amount. Impairments may be reversed at a later reporting date.
The separate financial statements are presented in Norwegian Kroner (NOK), which is the functional and presentation currency of AUSS.
Foreign currency transactions are translated into the functional currency using the exchange rates prevailing at the dates of the transactions. Foreign exchange gains and losses resulting from the settlement of such transactions and from the translation at year-end exchange rates of monetary assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies are recognised in the income statement.
Property, plant and equipment are stated at historical cost less depreciation and impairment. Historical cost includes expenditure that is directly attributable to the acquisition of the items.
Subsequent costs are included in the asset's carrying amount or recognised as a separate asset, as appropriate, only when it is probable that future economic benefits associated with the cost will flow to the Company and the cost of the item can be measured reliably. All other repairs and maintenance are charged to the income statement during the financial period in which they are incurred.
Depreciation of fixed assets is calculated using the straight-line method to allocate cost less residual value over estimated useful lives.
The assets' residual values, useful lives and depreciation methods are reviewed, and adjusted if appropriate, at each balance sheet date. An asset's carrying amount is written down to its recoverable amount if the asset's carrying amount is greater than its estimated recoverable amount.
Gains and losses on disposals are determined by comparing proceeds with carrying amount.
The Company classifies its financial assets in the following categories: at fair value through profit or loss, loans and receivables. The classification depends on the purpose for which the financial assets were acquired. Management determines the classification of its financial assets at initial recognition.
Loans and receivables are non-derivative financial assets with fixed or determinable payments that are not quoted in an active market. They are included in current assets, except for maturities greater than 12 months after the balance sheet date. These are classified as non-current assets. Loans and receivables are classified as 'other receivables' in the balance sheet (note 10).
Account receivables are recognised initially at fair value and subsequently measured at amortised cost using the effective interest method, less provision for impairment. A provision for impairment of account receivables is established when there is objective evidence that the Company will not be able to collect all amounts due according to the original terms of receivables. Significant financial difficulties of the debtor, probability that the debtor will enter bankruptcy or financial reorganisation, and default or delinquency in payments are considered indicators that the account receivable is impaired. The amount of the provision is the difference between the asset's carrying amount and the present value of estimated future cash flows, discounted at the effective interest rate. The amount of the provision is recognised in the income statement within 'other operating expenses'.
When a trade receivable is uncollectable, it is written off against the allowance account for trade receivables. Subsequent recoveries of amounts previously written off are credited against 'selling and marketing costs' in the income statement.
Cash and cash equivalents includes cash in hand, deposits held at call with banks, other short-term highly liquid investments with original maturities of three months or less, and bank overdrafts. Bank overdrafts are shown within borrowings in current liabilities on the balance sheet.
Ordinary shares are classified as equity. Incremental costs directly attributable to the issue of new shares or options are shown in equity as a deduction, net of tax, from the proceeds.
Borrowings are recognised initially at fair value, net of transaction costs incurred.
Borrowings are classified as current liabilities unless the Group has an unconditional right to defer settlement of the liability for at least 12 months after the balance sheet date.
The current income tax charge is calculated on the basis of the tax laws enacted or substantively enacted at the balance sheet date.
Deferred income tax is provided in full at nominal values, using the liability method, on temporary differences arising between the tax bases of assets and liabilities and their carrying amounts in the consolidated financial statements. Deferred income tax is determined using tax rates (and laws) that have been enacted or substantially enacted by the balance sheet date and are expected to apply when the related deferred income tax asset is realised or the deferred income tax liability is settled.
Deferred income tax assets are recognised to the extent that it is probable that future taxable profit will be available against which the temporary differences can be utilised.
All employees have a defined contribution pension scheme.
Provisions (e.g. environmental restoration, restructuring costs and legal claims) are recognised when:
Provisions are not recognised for future operating losses.
Where there are a number of similar obligations, the likelihood that an outflow will be required in settlement is determined by considering the class of obligations as a whole. A provision is recognised even if the likelihood of an outflow with respect to any one item included in the same class of obligations may be small.
The company's revenue consists of sale of administrative services to related parties. These services are based on accrued time.
Revenues comprise the fair value of the consideration received or receivable net of value-added tax, returns, rebates and discounts.
The services are recognised when the amount of revenue can be reliably measured, it is probable that future economic benefits will flow to the entity and when specific criteria have been met for
each of the Company's activities as described below. The amount of revenue is not considered to be reliably measurable until all contingencies relating to the sale have been resolved. The Company bases its estimates on historical results, taking into consideration the type of customer, the type of transaction and the specifics of each arrangement.
The Company uses the right to derogate from the regulations in IAS 10 no. 12 and 13 in simplified IFRS, according to which dividend may be recognised as income in accordance with Norwegian Accounting Act. Dividends from subsidiaries are recognised in the period they relate to. Dividends from other companies are recognised when the right to receive payment is established.
Borrowing costs incurred for the construction of any qualifying asset are capitalised during the period of time that is required to complete and prepare the asset for its intended use. Other borrowing costs are expensed.
Contingent liabilities are defined as
Contingent liabilities are not recognised in the annual financial statements apart from contingent liabilities which are acquired through the acquisition of an entity. Significant contingent liabilities are disclosed, with the exception of contingent liabilities where the probability of the liability occurring is remote.
Contingent liabilities acquired upon the purchase of operations are recognised at fair value even if the liability is not probable. The assessment of probability and fair value is subject to constant review. Changes in the fair value are recognised in the income statement.
A contingent asset is not recognised in the financial statements, but is disclosed if there is a certain level of probability that a benefit will accrue to the Company.
The Company must apply IAS 7 even though the financial statements are prepared according to simplified IFRS. The Company's cash flow statement shows the overall cash flow broken down to operating, investing and financing activities. The cash flow statement illustrates the effect of the various activities on cash and cash equivalents.
New information after the balance sheet date concerning the Company's financial position at the balance sheet date is considered in the financial statements. An event after the balance sheet date that does not affect the Company's financial position on the balance sheet date, but will affect the company's financial position in the future is reported where material.
The Company must apply IAS 33 even though the financial statements are prepared according to simplified IFRS. Earnings per share are calculated by the profit attributable to equity holders of the company of the result for the period being divided by a time-weighted average of ordinary shares for the period.
Diluted earnings per share is calculated by adjusting the weighted average number of ordinary shares outstanding to assume conversion of all dilutive potential ordinary shares.


13.05.2022 REPORT Q1 2022 24.05.2022 ANNUAL GENERAL MEETING 24.08.2022 REPORT Q2 2022 15.11.2022 REPORT Q3 2022 21.02.2023 PRELIMINARY ANNUAL RESULTS 2022
Please note that the dates might be subject to changes.
We confirm, to the best of our knowledge, that the financial statements for the period 1st of January to 31st of December 2021 have been prepared in accordance with current applicable account standards, and give a true and fair view of the assets, liabilities, financial position and profit or loss of the entity and the group taken as a whole. We also confirm that the management report includes a true and fair review of the development and performance of the business and the position of the entity and the group, together with a description of the principal risks and uncertainties facing the entity and the group.
Storebø, 22nd of April 2022 Board of Directors in Austevoll Seafood ASA
Siren M. Grønhaug Arne Møgster
Hege Solbakken Eirik Drønen Melingen Lill Maren Møgster Board member Board member Board member
Helge Singelstad Helge Møgster Hege Charlotte Bakken Chairman Board member Deputy Chairman
Board member CEO & President

We have audited the financial statements of Austevoll Seafood ASA, which comprise:
In our opinion:
Our opinion is consistent with our additional report to the Audit Committee.
We conducted our audit in accordance with International Standards on Auditing (ISAs). Our responsibilities under those standards are further described in the Auditor's Responsibilities for the Audit of the Financial Statements section of our report. We are independent of the Company and the Group as required by laws and regulations and the International Ethics Standards Board for Accountants' International Code of Ethics for Professional Accountants (including International Independence Standards) (IESBA Code), and we have fulfilled our other ethical responsibilities in accordance with these requirements. We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our opinion.
To the best of our knowledge and belief, no prohibited non-audit services referred to in the Audit Regulation (537/2014) Article 5.1 have been provided.
We have been the auditor of the Company for 26 years from the election by the general meeting of the shareholders on 24 May 1996 for the accounting year 1996.
PricewaterhouseCoopers AS, Sandviksbodene 2A, Postboks 3984 - Sandviken, NO-5835 Bergen T: 02316, org. no.: 987 009 713 VAT, www.pwc.no
State authorised public accountants, members of The Norwegian Institute of Public Accountants, and authorised accounting firm

Key audit matters are those matters that, in our professional judgment, were of most significance in our audit of the financial statements of the current period. These matters were addressed in the context of our audit of the financial statements as a whole, and in forming our opinion thereon, and we do not provide a separate opinion on these matters. The Groups business activities are largely unchanged compared to last year. Measurement and valuation of biological assets contain approximately the same complexity and risks as previous year and have been in focus for the audit also this year.
As described in the financial statements Austevoll Seafood ASA values biological assets to their fair value according to IAS 41. At the balance sheet date, the fair value of biological assets was MNOK 6 173, of which MNOK 4 706 is historical cost and MNOK 1 467 is adjustment to fair value.
Biological assets comprise inventory of ova (eggs), juveniles, cleaner fish, brood stock and fish held for harvesting purposes (on growing stage). Measured in fair value biological assets constitute approximately 14 % of the balance sheet as at 31 December 2021.
Due to the nature and location of the inventory, it is impracticable to attend the physical inventory counting. Consequently, we have performed alternative audit procedures to obtain sufficient appropriate audit evidence regarding the existence and condition of the inventory. The group has established control procedures for measurement of both number of fish and biomass. However, a certain inherent risk of deviations exists in the measurement. We have therefore focused on measurement of the inventory of biological assets (number and biomass) in the audit, with emphasis on fish for harvesting purposes, which constitutes the main part of the Group's biological assets.
The Group's biomass system includes information about number of fish, average weight and biomass per site. We reconciled the movement in the inventory of fish held for harvesting purposes (in number and biomass) for the farming units in the period. The movement in number of fish is the total of smolt stocked, mortality, other loss and harvested fish whereas the movement in biomass is the total of stocked biomass, net growth in the period and harvested biomass. We focused particularly on number of smolt stocked and net growth in kilo. This has the most significant impact on the measuring at the balance sheet date.
We reviewed the Group's routines connected to recording of number of smolt stocked. In order to assure the accuracy of the number of fish registered in the biomass system we tested if a selection of recorded smolt stocked from the production system agreed to the number of fish according to supporting documentation. Supporting documentation may for instance be invoice from smolt supplier, vaccination report or well boat count. We also reviewed and tested the Group's routines for continuous registration of mortality.
The period's net growth corresponds to the feed used in the period divided by the feed conversion rate. The feed consumption is again closely related to the purchase of feed in the period. In order to estimate the feed consumption and the feed purchase in the period, we reviewed the Group's routines for reconciliation of feed inventory and tested a sample of feed purchase throughout the year against incoming invoice from the feed suppliers. Furthermore, we compared the accumulated feed conversion rate of the inventory against our expectation based on historic figures for the individual region. Where the feed conversion rate was significantly higher or lower than expected, we obtained further documentation and explanations. Our work substantiated that the net growth had been reasonably assessed.
In order to challenge the historical accuracy of the Group's biomass estimates, we reviewed the harvest deviation for the period. Harvest deviation is defined as the difference between harvested biomass (in kilos and numbers) and estimated biomass according to the Group's biomass systems. We also reviewed harvest deviation after the balance sheet date to verify the correctness of fish ready to be harvested as at 31 December 2021. We found the deviations to be relatively limited overall and in accordance with expectations.

The fluctuations in fair value estimate that arise for instance due to change in market prices may have a significant impact on the operating result for the period. Austevoll Seafood ASA therefore presents the effect of value adjustments connected to biological assets as a separate line item before the operating result.
We focused on the valuation of biological assets due to the size of the amount, the complexity and the judgement involved in the calculation and the impact of the value adjustment on the result for the year.
See the description of the measurement and valuation of biological assets in note 2 about critical accounting estimates and judgements, note 7 about biological assets, and note 29 about accounting policies.
We reviewed the Group's structuring of calculation model for valuation by comparing it against the criteria in IAS 41 and IFRS 13 and found no obvious deviations. Furthermore, we examined whether the biomass and number of fish used in the Group's model for calculation of fair value of biological assets corresponded with the Group's biomass systems and tested if the model made mathematic calculations as intended.
After having tested if these basic elements were in place, we assessed whether the assumptions used by the Group in the model, were reasonable. We did this by discussing the assumptions with the Group and comparing them to among other things, historical data, available industry data and observable prices. We found the assumptions to be reasonable.
We assessed whether the disclosures in the notes appropriately explained the methods for measurement and valuation, and if the information was in accordance with the requirements in the accounting standards.
The Board of Directors and the Managing Director (management) are responsible for the information in the Board of Directors' report and the other information accompanying the financial statements. The other information comprises information in the annual report, but does not include the financial statements and our auditor's report thereon. Our opinion on the financial statements does not cover the information in the Board of Directors' report nor the other information accompanying the financial statements.
In connection with our audit of the financial statements, our responsibility is to read the Board of Directors' report and the other information accompanying the financial statements. The purpose is to consider if there is material inconsistency between the Board of Directors' report and the other information accompanying the financial statements and the financial statements or our knowledge obtained in the audit, or whether the Board of Directors' report and the other information accompanying the financial statements otherwise appears to be materially misstated. We are required to report if there is a material misstatement in the Board of Directors' report or the other information accompanying the financial statements. We have nothing to report in this regard.
Based on our knowledge obtained in the audit, it is our opinion that the Board of Directors' report
Our opinion on the Board of Director's report applies correspondingly to the statements on Corporate Governance and Corporate Social Responsibility.
Management is responsible for the preparation of financial statements that give a true and fair view in accordance with simplified application of international accounting standards according to the Norwegian Accounting Act section 3-9, and for the preparation and true and fair view of the consolidated financial statements of the Group in accordance with International Financial Reporting
3 / 5

Standards as adopted by the EU, and for such internal control as management determines is necessary to enable the preparation of financial statements that are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error.
In preparing the financial statements, management is responsible for assessing the Company's and the Group's ability to continue as a going concern, disclosing, as applicable, matters related to going concern and using the going concern basis of accounting unless management either intends to liquidate the Group or to cease operations, or has no realistic alternative but to do so.
Our objectives are to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements as a whole are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error, and to issue an auditor's report that includes our opinion. Reasonable assurance is a high level of assurance, but is not a guarantee that an audit conducted in accordance with ISAs will always detect a material misstatement when it exists. Misstatements can arise from fraud or error and are considered material if, individually or in aggregate, they could reasonably be expected to influence the economic decisions of users taken on the basis of these financial statements.
As part of an audit in accordance with ISAs, we exercise professional judgment and maintain professional scepticism throughout the audit. We also:
We communicate with the Board of Directors regarding, among other matters, the planned scope and timing of the audit and significant audit findings, including any significant deficiencies in internal control that we identify during our audit.
We also provide the Audit Committee with a statement that we have complied with relevant ethical requirements regarding independence, and to communicate with them all relationships and other matters that may reasonably be thought to bear on our independence, and where applicable, related safeguards.

From the matters communicated with the Board of Directors, we determine those matters that were of most significance in the audit of the financial statements of the current period and are therefore the key audit matters. We describe these matters in our auditor's report unless law or regulation precludes public disclosure about the matter or when, in extremely rare circumstances, we determine that a matter should not be communicated in our report because the adverse consequences of doing so would reasonably be expected to outweigh the public interest benefits of such communication.
Report on compliance with Regulation on European Single Electronic Format (ESEF)
We have performed an assurance engagement to obtain reasonable assurance that the financial statements with file name 5967007LIEEXZXFFDC03-2021-12-31-no.zip have been prepared in accordance with Section 5-5 of the Norwegian Securities Trading Act (Verdipapirhandelloven) and the accompanying Regulation on European Single Electronic Format (ESEF). In our opinion, the financial statements have been prepared, in all material respects, in accordance with the requirements of ESEF.
Management is responsible for preparing, tagging and publishing the financial statements in the single electronic reporting format required in ESEF. This responsibility comprises an adequate process and the internal control procedures which management determines is necessary for the preparation, tagging and publication of the financial statements.
For a description of the auditor's responsibilities when performing an assurance engagement of the ESEF reporting, see: https://revisorforeningen.no/revisjonsberetninger
Bergen, 28 April 2022 PricewaterhouseCoopers AS
State Authorised Public Accountant
Note: This translation from Norwegian has been prepared for information purposes only.

Alfabygget 5392 Storebø NORWAY
Ph: +47 56 18 10 00 Email: [email protected] Web: www.auss.no
Av. Victor Andres Belaúnde 147 Torre Real 1, piso 3 Centro Empresarial Real San Isidro Lima 27 PERU
| Ph: | +51 (1) 710-7000 |
|---|---|
| Email: | [email protected] |
| Web: | www.austral.com.pe |
Alfabygget 5392 Storebø NORWAY
Ph: +47 56 18 11 10 Email: [email protected] Web: www.brbi.no
Av. Pedro Aguirre Cerda 995 Coronel CHILE
Ph: +56 (41) 292 2480 Email: [email protected] Web: www.fcc.cl
PO Box 7600 5020 Bergen
Visiting address: Thormøhlensgate 51 B 5006 Bergen NORWAY
Ph: +47 55 21 36 50 Email: [email protected] Web: www.leroy.no
Postboks 444 Sentrum 5805 Bergen
Visiting address: Bradbenken 1 5003 Bergen NORWAY
Ph: +47 57 84 44 00 Email: [email protected] Web: www.pelagia.com


Alfabygget 5392 Storebø NORWAY www.auss.no
Building tools?
Free accounts include 100 API calls/year for testing.
Have a question? We'll get back to you promptly.