Environmental & Social Information • Apr 20, 2021
Environmental & Social Information
Open in ViewerOpens in native device viewer


WE EMPOWER SUSTAINABLE PROGRESS.
Consolidated Non-Financial Statement prepared in accordance with Italian Legislative Decree 254/16_year 2020









Consolidated Non-nancial Statement prepared in accordance with Italian Legislative Decree 254/16_year 2020

Michele Crisostomo

Francesco Starace
Chairman Chief Executive Ocer and General Manager
A dicult year like 2020, dominated by a world health emergency, has catapulted our company into the future, acting as an accelerator of key energy transition related trends: decarbonization, electrication, and digitalization. The most sustainable companies showed the highest levels of exibility and competitiveness, while maintaining a lower risk prole. It became clear that sustainable progress opens the way to more growth oppounities for companies and greater resilience in the face of sudden disruptions, with a lower risk prole for shareholders. Within this context, at Enel we see innovation and sustainability as inseparable pas of the same motive force, while preserving
the spirit of service and care for the society in which we operate as critical components of our DNA. We are pa of the landscape and an essential element in the lives of people, businesses, and society at large. Our journey staed out bringing light to homes and enabling development by making electricity available to businesses. We opened up to new technologies, new panership models, new ways of using energy, thus fully engaging all our stakeholders to create a more sustainable future together. This approach has allowed us to become the biggest private operator in the renewable energy sector as well as the largest private electricity distribution company with the most advanced level of network digitalization, and to manage the most extensive retail customer base, for energy and gas, of any private company in the world. We generate, distribute, and sell electricity in an ever more sustainable manner, ensuring no one gets left behind. We engage our stakeholders to keep them increasingly in touch with our business, making them an integral pa of our sustainable business model. In such a period of change, with all players involved moving at dierent speeds and many new variables to contend with, there must be a clear and far-reaching strategic vision as well as planning abilities in line with the UN Sustainable Development Goals. An enduringly sustainable company creates value because its actions and oering are in line with the future demands of the intrinsically sustainable stakeholders of tomorrow. For this reason we decided to release, for the rst time, a 10-year plan clearly describing our long-term vision and the utility company we aim to become in the coming years. The ongoing decarbonization process means that we will soon sta using electricity even in all those sectors that currently rely heavily on fossil fuels, fuher cementing our commitment to digitalization and the search for innovative solutions to electrify end uses. At the same time, our physical infrastructure will become increasingly exposed to climate change related phenomena including ooding, drought, scorching heat and severe cold. We aim to take on these challenges by increasing the safety and resilience of our plants and networks so we can continue to guarantee high levels of service quality and reliability for our customers, who are more and more aware that electricity today is the simplest and most natural choice to make a direct personal contribution to a sustainable future.
Innovation and circular economy are emphasized throughout all activities across our value chain, introducing the concept of sustainability staing from the design phase. We will reduce direct CO2 emissions by 80% within 2030 versus 2017 levels, as certied by the Science Based Targets initiative, reaching carbon neutrality within 2050. The primary actors in our strategy are people, with their innovative skills and digital mindset: they must be given a guarantee of sustainable growth and the adoption of circularity principles. Circularity means enhancing existing potential in new directions by way of reskilling and upskilling programs. A new modus operandi, enhancing relationships, trust, and respect for the talent of each individual, without relaxing our goal-centered focus.
The strategic paners in Enel's growth process include our suppliers, who have displayed quick reactions and an exceptional ability to reorganize in order to meet demands arising during the year-long pandemic. We view our suppliers as fellow travelers as we set out on a path characterized by increasing levels of research into innovation and sustainability in every aspect of our future collaboration.
The result is that today we are applying sustainability-based thinking to all areas of our business, also in the nancial sphere. Our leadership in this area is recognized worldwide thanks also to the Group's presence in various prestigious ratings, indices, and sustainability rankings.
The key elements include sustainability measurement throughout the entire value chain using specic metrics, and the denition of ever more ambitious goals, not merely to document results achieved, but above all to anticipate decisions and develop a proactive stance. An account of sustainability that not only porays past events but allows us to travel through time to glimpse the Enel of the future.
By making a joint commitment we can follow a sustainable path that will make our company and surrounding communities more prosperous, inclusive, sustainable, and resilient.

Le er to stakeholders 102-14
Make desitions in daily activities
Share information, being willing to collaborate
Follow trough with commitments, pursuing
Change priorities rapidly if the situation evolves.
Get results by aiming for excellence.
Adopt and promote safe behavior and move
Work for the integration of all, recognizing
Work focusing on satisfying customers
Propose new solution and do not give up
Recognize merit in co-workers and give


> Proactivity > Responsibility > Innovation
| Our sustainable business model and value creation |
10 |
|---|---|
| Covid-19: our response | 14 |
| Sustainability governance and our involvement in the leading associations |
16 |
| Sustainable nance, sustainability 20 ratings and indices |
|
| Our priorities and stakeholder involvement |
25 |
| Our sustainability strategy and contribution to sustainable |
32 |

development goals
TOPIC VIEW
| Net-zero ambition | 38 |
|---|---|
| Electrication, | 86 |
| digital and platforms |
| People centricity | |
|---|---|
| Our people | 104 |
| Local and global communities 122 |
| Innovation | 144 |
|---|---|
| Digital suppo–s and cyber security |
154 |
| Circular economy | 168 |
| ESG backbones | |
|---|---|
| Sustainable supply chain | 182 |
| Occupational health | 194 |
| and safety | |
| Environmental sustainability |
206 |
| Sound governance | 234 |


| Tax transparency approach | 264 |
|---|---|
| The European taxonomy | 284 |
| Green Bond Repo– 2020 and suppo–ing notes |
294 |
| Methodological note and Independent auditors' repo– |
312 |
|---|---|
| Sustainability statement: pe¥ormance indicators |
332 |
| GRI Content Index | 374 |
| SASB Content Index | 387 |
| WEF Content Index | 392 |
| TCFD Content Index | 393 |




Sustainability Report 2020

We are a leading energy group with a sustainable business model that creates long-term value for all stakeholders
We approach every aspect of our business, including nance, in a sustainable, innovative and circular way
We set the priorities that underpin our strategy, commitment and repoing through a structured materiality analysis process and the continuous and direct involvement of our stakeholders
Our strategy makes sustainability the focus, with a view to achieving the UN Sustainable Development Goals




ESG context
66,717 Enel people 21.5% women 40.9 training hours per employee 157,940 contractor company people (FTE)
51.5 Mm3 total water withdrawal 22.9% withdrawal in water stressed areas 23.9 Mtep energy consumption 1,300 ha of protected areas
84.0 GW net ecient installed capacity 53.6% net ecient installed renewable capacity 2.2 mil km of network 69.5 mil retail customers 74.3 mil end users 44.3 mil end users with active sma meters 105.2 thousand charging points(1) 123 MW storage 6.0 GW demand response 10,197 mil euros Capex 94% Capex low carbon 80% Capex Eligible European Taxonomy 837 patents for inventions, of which 692 awarded
0.52 injury frequency rate combined 29.4% women managers + middle managers 5.6% turnover rate 15.1 mil beneciaries (projects SDG 4, 7, 8)(2)
214 gCO2eq /kWh specic emissions Scope 1 97.9 mil t CO2eq (Scope 1, 2, 3) 20.4 Mm3 total water consumption 31.6% consumption in water stressed areas 65.7% waste recovery 187 biodiversity projects
2.9 GW renewable additional net maximum capacity(3) 484.6 TWh transpoed electricity 298.2 TWh sold electricity 259 min SAIDI 23.0 mil euros gross global added value 65.0 bil euros revenues 17.9 bil euros Ordinary EBITDA 87% EBITDA low carbon 64% EBITDA elegible European Taxonomy 16,100 mil euros total tax contribution 4,755 mil euros dividends paid and purchase of treasury shares 32 innovative solutions adopted by the business

SUSTAINABLE VALUE CREATION IN THE LONG TERM

PRINCIPLE OF GOVERNANCE 44% women on the Board of Directors | 151 repos concerning the Code of Ethics (of which 26 violations)
We are a global leader in the energy sector
We are integrated along the entire value chain

VALUE CHAIN
GLOBAL BUSINESS LINE
Generation
Trading (wholesale) Market
Distribution (end customer)
(1) Public and private charging points installed. Including interoperability points, the value is 186,000.
(2) Cumulative gures since 2015.
(3) The value does not include managed capacity, the overall value including managed capacity is 3.1 GW.

MIS SIO N
VA LU ES
We are a leading group in the energy sector, with a presence in over 40 countries on ve continents, veically integrated along the entire value chain. Our strategy, which is centered on sustainability, has allowed us to conrm our leadership in the energy transition in 2020, creating value for all stakeholders and continuing to contribute to the achievement of the United Nations' Sustainable Develop-
ment Goals (SDGs).
By exploiting synergies between the various business areas, taking actions by leveraging innovation, implementing Open Power behaviors, we promote solutions to reduce environmental impact and meet the requirements of customers and the local communities in which we operate, with a commitment to guaranteeing high safety standards for the people who work in the company and its contractors. We are therefore able to meet the new challenges of the energy transition process, not simply by reacting to risks, but by embracing all the oppounities leaving no one behind. This approach is conducive to detecting the faint signals that will turn into future trends.

102-5 102-6 102-7 102-15 201-1 303-1 404-1 405-1 EU1 EU2 EU3 EU4 102-2 305-1 102-4 401-1 303-3
AT A GLANCE
Macrotrends, risks and oppounities dene the context in which the organization operates. The purpose, mission, vision and values concern the entire organization and de ne the aim of the company in clear and concise terms. The governance principles are intended to create a solid guidance and supervision structure. The growth engine is our sustainable business model, which leverages the various input resources, divided into three macro categories (people, planet and prosperity) and conves them into outputs through the various company activities. We operate all along the value chain through specic Business Lines (Global Power Generation, Global Infrastructure and Networks, Enel X and Global Trading), assisted by Global Service Functions (Procurement and Digital Solutions) and Sta Functions (Administration, Finance and Control, Innovation and Sustainability, People and Organization, Communication, Legal and Corporate Aairs, Audit) with every country operating in its respective area of competence by applying the Business Lines matrix. The organization's activities and outputs allow it to create value in the sho, medium and long term for the various stakeholders. An integrated thinking and decision-making process that combines economic, nancial, environmental and social sustainability.
The 2020 results highlight our strong commitment to sustainable growth, as demonstrated by the more than 10 billion euros invested during the year. Our investments are directed towards achieving a sustainable and integrated business model based on renewables, distribution and advanced energy services, leveraging the primary role of digitalization and platforms. This approach is aimed at accelerating growth both through the 'Ownership' model, which is based on direct investments, and through the 'Stewardship' model, which involves third paies. In addition to promoting growth in the areas where we operate, this has allowed us to fuher accelerate the decarbonization of the Group's production mix.
In paicular, production from renewable sources exceeded that from conventional sources, growing to 53%1 , and coal red generation fell drastically by 65%, with a consequent reduction in specic Scope 1 emissions to 214 gCO2eq/kWh (-28% compared to 2019). In terms of capacity, the Group also installed 3.1 GW2 of additional renewable power and reduced coal-red capacity by 2.8 GW. Enel is aware of the great impoance that digitalization plays in each activity of its value chain and therefore fuher increased the percentage of its generation plants integrated into the dedicated information system to more than 89% in terms of the number of plants and the 94% in terms of capacity. As regards infrastructure and the respective digitalization, the Group achieved excellent results as for service quality improvement, with a 12% reduction compared to 2019 in the SAIDI indicator of the average duration of outages. 44.3 million out of Enel's 74.3 million end users are now equipped with an active sma meter, which equates to a 60% coverage. In order to increasingly promote consumption electrication, the spread of new services and products continued, including charging points for electric mobility, of which there are now over 186,0003.
One of the fundamental levers for achieving these important results is of course the 66,717 people who work at the Company, who benet from many development and training programs, 60% of them focused on upskilling and reskilling, in order to be©er manage and suppo the energy transition. Women account for 21.5% of the Company's total workforce, and, thanks to the specic a©ention paid to diversity, which aims to enhance resources even before their entry into the Company, in 2020 the percentage of female managers and middle managers grew to 29.4%. Thanks to the consistent a©ention paid to health and safety, the combined accident frequency index for Enel and contractor employees fell fuher compared to previous years (0.52 in 2020 vs 0.73 in 2019). As regards projects with local communities, the activity focused on providing access to energy (SDG 7.1), quality education (SDG 4) and socio-economic development (SDG 8), reaching over 15 million beneciaries since 2015.
Impoant results were also achieved in terms of environmental sustainability through a reduction of all other polluting emissions, water requirements and waste produced, which led to the previous objectives set for 2030 being exceeded and therefore redened. By reducing its consumption of materials and energy and paying increasing a©ention to the circularity of resources, the Group is reducing its overall footprint in environmental terms.
Progress achieved in the responsible management of the supply chain and sound governance continue to provide strong foundations for the strategic model. Innovation and digitalization dominate every process in the value chain and are accelerating growth in the various areas.
A leadership in sustainability that is therefore recognized internationally, paicularly thanks to the Group's presence in several impoant sustainability ratings, indices and rankings, including the MSCI AAA rating and conrmation of its inclusion in the MSCI ESG Leaders Indices, the Dow Jones World and Europe sustainability indices, the CDP Climate "A" List rating, the Vigeo-Eiris rating, in which the Group is now ranked rst across all sectors and received conrmation of its Euronext Vigeo-Eiris 120 rating, the Refinitiv ESG rating and the FTSE4Good index, both of which have conrmed it as an industry leader. Fuhermore, for the rst time, Enel was included in the three main indices that monitor company pe¥ormance on gender diversity (Bloomberg Gender Equality Index, Renitiv Top 100 Diversity and Inclusion Index, Equileap Gender Equality Top 100 ranking).
Despite the nancial crisis, the nancial results also show how the Group carried on growing by continuing to generate value. In paicular, 2020 ended with an ordinary EBITDA of 17.9 billion euros, in line with the previous year's results. The ordinary net prot, on which the dividend is calculated, reached 5.2 billion euros, up 8% compared to the previous year. The dividend for 2020 amounts to around 36 euro cents per share, up 8% on 2019. The FFO to net debt ratio, a nancial strength indicator, reached 25% by the end


of the year. The net debt is 45.4 billion euros, lower than the forecasts previously issued to the market. The total tax contribution was around 16,100 million euros, a signi cant value that highlights the impoance of the Group's tax contribution to the communities in which it operates as a suppo for their stability and resilience.
Our solid economic and sustainability-related pe¥ormance reinforce market condence in us. This is demonstrated by the 17% increase in value that the Enel stock recorded during the year, outpe¥orming both the sector index (Euro Stoxx Utilities: +10%) and the Italian one (FTSE MIB: -5%). In 2020 we were conrmed as the rst European utility by market capitalization and the second in the world.
The Group's value is linked to its ability to operate in a sustainable way and to be at the service of the community. Sustainability allows us to work better on all fronts and to create greater value for the Company and for our stakeholders.
Sustainability is our distinguishing feature, the beacon that allows us to lead the energy transition. This approach sets us apart in the ecosystem in which we operate, and makes us both unique and a global leader.
Communications
Robeo Deambrogio
The challenge is not to communicate individual sustainable projects, but to get people to understand that, for us, sustainability lies at the foundation of all we do, and is central to our strategy.
1 2 3 4 At a Glance Our ESG peormance Trend Topic Appendix
(1) Includes managed production.
(2) Includes managed capacity. The value of the consolidated additional renewable capacity is equal to 2.9 GW.
(3) Public and private charging points. Includes interoperability points, net of which there are 105 thousand charging points installed at the end of 2020.

In order to deal with the emergency linked to Covid-19, Enel responded quickly and in a determined way to minimize the spread of the infection while at the same time guaranteeing the operation and provision of services in the countries where it operates4.
5
emergency linked to the Covid-19 pandemic. In paicular, while the world has begun to dene a new normality, Enel has launched the global "ReShape" challenge, with the aim of identifying innovative solutions for the future of energy and to face emerging needs.
Finally, the remuneration policy for 2020 establishes a new pe¥ormance target for the Chief Executive Ocer/General Manager and executives with strategic responsibilities (ESR), as pa of the sho-term variable component ("MBO"), which measures the ability of the Group to manage company activities remotely, where possible, guaranteeing continuity of service and excellent standards of operational eciency.
A global task force has been established to coordinate and direct initiatives in the countries where we operate. The task force works in synergy with the Global Business Lines and is responsible for providing ocial instructions so that, through dedicated task forces, each country is able to manage any type of emergency locally. Enel is constantly updated on information relating to Covid-19 and strives to take preventive measures and any initiative that may be necessary.
Enel is commi©ed to taking measures to suppo the main organizations involved in providing health and social care to help the territories and communities where it operates every day. Around 450 sustainability projects have been developed in two areas of intervention:
containment of the health emergency with initiatives to suppo hospitals and front line assistance to citizens;
suppo for the economic revitalization of communities, through programs to suppo food security, development of micro-entrepreneurship, services dedicated to vulnerable customers and distance vocational and educational training.
In Italy, through Enel Cuore, Enel has suppoed the organizations working on the front line to deal with the emergency, making a contribution of 23 million euros to the Civil Defense Depament, health facilities, non-prot organizations, local administrations throughout the Country4.
A new free solution called "City Analytics Mobility Map" was also launched that uses daily mobility statistics to suppo public administrations in verifying the eectiveness of mobility restriction policies to combat Covid-19 and in dening data driven strategies. for the new phase of normality.
Enel faced 2020 with distinctive resilience by continuing on a path taken several years ago that is focused on adopting a cloud computing approach and which allowed the company to overcome the disruption by relying on a modern and exible structure. Enel also carried out several simulations, tests, and checks on its infrastructure without encountering any problems in its normal operations. In view of the potential developments in the situation, incremental measures are planned for energy generation and distribution networks, aimed at ensuring the provision of services and the safety of national electricity systems.
Communication channels had to adapt to the new way of working from home, ensuring the e ciency and eectiveness of the relationship between Enel and its customers. Thanks to a globally
We have worked from the beginning to suppo the communities in which we operate, our customers, our people and all those who work with us, in order to contribute to the economic and social recovery and the creation of shared value with all our stakeholders.
coordinated eo, based on promoting digital channels, various measures were successfully taken to meet the growing needs of customers while complying with travel restrictions and social distancing requirements. Among the various projects, Brazil launched #JuntosNaMesmaEnergia, a package of initiatives including video lessons and seminars through the Enel Shares platform, including guidelines for responsible energy consumption and safety advice relating to the electricity grid during isolation.
Activities that would require physical interaction between Enel and suppliers are now conducted remotely (e.g. site inspections at the company) and safety measures for contractors' sta have been strengthened.
Enel has implemented continuous sma working until fuher notice in all countries and for all its employees whose work can be done from home, with the sole exception of activities that cannot be carried out remotely, especially those required to ensure the provision of services and the safety of national electricity systems. As of the end of February 2020, all international trips have been canceled, with the exception of transfers needed to ensure the provision of services. All international events and training courses are carried out using non-face-to-face a©endance tools to ensure the Company's operations. A global insurance policy covering all employees in the event of hospitalization due to Covid-19 infection was taken out and renewed for 2021. This is the rst insurance intervention in the world aimed at providing global suppo to cope with the pandemic. In order to provide emotional suppo to people during the Covid-19 emergency, a free listening and psychological suppo service was activated from the very beginning in the Group's main countries. Fuhermore, in order to promote well-being, the #IWorkWellFromHome video-manifesto was created and disseminated via a dedicated communication campaign, with suggestions on how to manage remote work times more easily, encourage inclusion and delegation, physical and relational well-being and work-life balance and counteract hyper-connection.
WE SUPPORT THE TERRITORIES AND COMMUNITIES IN WHICH WE OPERATE WE ARE COMMITTED TO GUARANTEEING CONTINUITY OF SERVICE AND CUSTOMER CARE, PARTICULARLY BY INCREASING INNOVATION AND DIGITALIZATION
WE WORK WITH SUPPLIERS
WE ARE COMMITTED TO GUARANTEEING CONTINUITY OF SERVICE AND CUSTOMER CARE, PARTICULARLY BY INCREASING INNOVATION AND DIGITALIZATION
The pandemic has also led to a fuher increase in cyber-attacks all over the world. Apa from the constant adoption and application of the cyber security strategy, Enel has developed special measures, aware of the fact that the cyber risk is not merely a corporate problem but can become a risk of ecosystemic propoions within the broader context of the complex and highly interconnected electricity industry. A policy was drawn up that provides an aiculated code of conduct addressed to all Enel people, to safeguard their digital identity, allow them to act safely in the world of social media and, when necessary, send notications concerning potential incidents and request assistance.
Enel's openinnovability.com crowdsourcing platform was also used to launch 17 challenges relevant to the health
(4) For fuher information on the actions and interventions implemented by the Group to deal with the impacts deriving from the Covid-19 emergency, please refer to the individual chapters. Additionally, for further information on the impacts of Covid-19 on nancial pe¥ormance, please refer to the relevant paragraphs on the Group pe¥ormance in the Repo on Operations and in note 5 of Enel's Consolidated Annual Financial Repo.
(4) Fuher information can be found in the Public disbursements - Disclosure pursuant to aicle 1, paragraphs 125-129, Law no. 124/2017.

tional sustainability networks.
A key element of the outlined approach is the adoption of ESG (Environmental, Social and Governance) sustainability indicators throughout the entire chain of value, not merely for the assessment of the results achieved, but above all to anticipate decisions and guide our actions. Enel has an ongoing commitment to the management and measurement of its pe¥ormance in terms of all relevant aspects, addressing economic, business and ESG issues in repoing its operations and dening the objectives underpinning its strategy. This model is fully in line with the requirements of the United Nations' Global Compact, of which Enel has been an active member since 2004, which stress the impoance of ever-increasing integration of sustainability throughout all corporate strategies. With the Enel Chief Executive Ocer si©ing on the Global Compact Board of Directors, absolute compliance with these requirements is fuher guaranteed. During 2020, Enel was a member of two working groups set up by the European Financial Repoing Advisory Group (EFRAG), one of them being the "Project task force on climate-related repoing", which ended with the presentation of a repo entitled "How to improve climate-related repoing" in February 2020. The main aim was to analyze and identify good corporate repoing practices as regards both the nancial impacts of climate risk on companies and the impact of the activities of companies on the environment (known as double materiality) taking into consideration the needs of users and those who prepare the repos. The collaboration with EFRAG continued through the Company's involvement in the work of the "Project task force on preparatory work for the elaboration of possible EU non-nancial repoing standards". The task force is responding to an ocial request for technical advice from the European Commission for the development of potential non-nancial repoing standards which could be pa of a review of the European directive on non-nancial information. Fuhermore, also in 2020, Enel became a member of the Global Sustainability Standards Board, the independent body that has the exclusive responsibility of developing and issuing the GRI Standards..
The organizational and corporate governance model denes specic tasks and responsibilities for which the Company's main governance bodies are responsible, guaranteeing that sustainability issues are appropriately taken into consideration during all impoant company decision-making processes.
The Board of Directors examines and approves the strategic, industrial, and nancial plans, including the annual budget and the Group Business Plan, which incorporate the principal guidelines to promote a sustainable business model and lay the basis for long-term value creation. The Board is responsible for approving the Sustainability Repo, which constitutes the Consolidated Non-Financial Statement (NFS) pursuant to Legislative Decree 254/16, after consulting the Control and Risks Commi©ee and the Corporate Governance and Sustainability Commi©ee. With regard to sustainability, during 2020 it dealt with a number of issues related to the climate and to promoting diversity, with reference to both disability and gender. Finally, at each meeting held since the end of February 2020, it received updates on the impacts of the Covid-19 pandemic in the countries where the Group operates.
Among other aspects, the Corporate Governance and Sustainability Commi¡ee monitors the sustainability issues associated with the Company's activities and its interaction with stakeholders, examines the Sustainability Plan guidelines and how sustainability policy is implemented, monitors Enel's ranking in the main sustainability ratings, and examines the layout of the Sustainability Repo and the structure of its contents, as well as the completeness and transparency of the disclosures supplied by the documents in question, examining the Company's main rules and procedures that are relevant to stakeholders.
The responsibilities of the Control and Risks Committee include examining the contents of the Sustainability Repo that are relevant to the Internal Control
and Risk Management System, and the main corporate rules and procedures linked to the Internal Control and Risk Management System that have a signicant impact on stakeholders.
The Nomination and Compensation Commi¡ee is tasked with suppoing – with adequate preliminary investigations – the Board of Directors' assessments and decision making on the size and composition of the Board itself, as well as on the remuneration of executive directors and key management personnel;
By coordinating the activities of the Board of Directors, the Chairman of the Board of Directors, who currently also occupies the post of Chairman of the Corporate Governance and Sustainability Commi©ee, pe¥orms a proactive role in the approval and supervision of the sustainability strategy.
The Chief Executive O¢cer and General Manager is responsible for dening and implementing a sustainable business model, dening the guidelines for management of the energy transition, promoting a low carbon model and corporate practices that consider the needs of the various stakeholders. He represents Enel in various initiatives dealing with sustainability, holding relevant positions in institutions of international impoance such as the United Nations Global Compact, as well as the Global Investors for Sustainable Development (GISD) Alliance launched by the United Nations in 2019.
The Innovability® (Innovation and Sustainability) Function, which repos directly to the Chief Executive Of cer, manages all activities related to sustainability and innovation. The Holding units responsible for Enel SpA's operations, paicularly the sustainability, circular economy, and community relations processes, play a guidance and coordination role for the Sustainability and Innovation units located in the various Countries and Business Lines. In paicular, the Sustainability Planning and Pe¥ormance Management and Human Rights Holding unit responsible for managing the sustainability planning, monitoring and repoing processes, and for the management of ESG ratings, sustainability indices and the Human Rights Policy, also repos to the Group CFO in order to guarantee the ever greater integration of these issues in corporate strategies and repoing.
The Global Business Lines, Countries, Global Service Functions and Holding Functions integrate ESG factors into their decision-making and operating processes, to create sustainable value in the long term, thanks to the presence of dedicated Sustainability structures in all Countries, Business Lines and Global Service Functions. At the local level, the expectations of the various stakeholders are identied, and specic sustainability plans dened, in line with the Group strategy.

Sustainability
governance and our
involvement in the
leading associations
102-18 102-19 102-20 102-26 102-29 102-32
Our governance structure is inspired by international best practices and permeates the various business, decision-making and operational processes along the entire value chain, in order to create long-term sustainable value
for the Company and for all our stakeholders.
Integrating ESG factors
in the Company's
operation
The integration of environmental, social and governance factors is guaranteed by means of structured processes across the whole Group that involve sustainability context analysis, identication of priorities for the Company and its stakeholders, sustainability planning, execution of specic actions to suppo sustainability objectives, repoing and management of ESG ratings and sustainability indices, as well as the management of the main national and interna-
At a Glance Our ESG peormance Trend Topic Appendix


|
|| || ||| |
Enel has been a "Paicipant" member of the UN Global Compact since 2004 and in 2020 it was conrmed as one of its LEAD companies, thanks to its commitment and adherence to the 10 founding principles on human rights, labor standards, environmental protection, and the ght against corruption. In 2020, Enel took pa in the "Sustainable Finance" Action Platform (with the co-presidency of the "CFO Taskforce for the SDGs"), "Climate Ambition", "Repoing on SDGs" and "Peace, Justice & Strong Institution", conrming its advanced level in submi©ing the Communication on Progress (CoP).
The Group is also a member of the Expe Network, while Enel's CEO is on his second mandate (2018-2021) as member of the organization's Board.
Finally, in 2020 Enel was among the signatories of the Statement "from business leaders for renewed global cooperation", promoted by the Platform on SDG 16 "Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions".
Since 2011, Enel has been a paner of Sustainable Energy for All (SEforALL), an international organization that collaborates with the United Nations and global leaders in the public and private sector for the advancement of SDG 7. In 2020, the Group CEO was appointed Chairman of the organization's Administrative Board, a position he will hold until 2023.
Finally, Enel will take pa in the preparatory work for the High-level Dialogue on Energy, the rst global energy summit to be held on the occasion of the 76th General Assembly of the United Nations in September 2021, of which SEforALL holds the co-presidency.
Since 2005 Enel has been a member of CSR Europe and from 2016 to 2020 it held the vice-chairmanship of the Board, of which it is currently a member. In 2020, Enel was among the main ambassadors of the European Pact 4 Sustainable Industry, inaugurated during the European SDG Summit and the result of the CEOs Call to Action, of which the Group was a pioneer.
Enel was also a promoter of the dialogue on the "Just Transition" and among the protagonists of the European SDG Summit, helping to organize four round tables on: the circular economy, sustainable nance, the just transition and the future of work, and the role of transparency and panerships in driving the SDGs.
Since 2016, Enel has been a member of the World Business Council for Sustainable Development (WBCSD) and is represented both on the Board, of which the CEO is a member, and at Liaison Delegate level. In 2020, the Group maintained its commitment to numerous programs and projects including: Transforming the Built Environment and Transforming Urban Mobility.
Enel was also paicularly active in the Energy Solutions project and in the Climate Action & Policy and SOS 1.5 projects: The Road to a Resilient, Zero-Carbon Future.
As a member since 2006, since 2016 the Enel Group has been pa of the Global Repoing Initiative (GRI) Community. In 2020, Enel joined the Global Sustainability Standards Board and maintained its commitment within the Corporate Leadership Group on Digital Repoing.
Fuhermore, Enel and GRI have strengthened their panership through an innovative form of collaboration that will end in 2021, with the dual objective of analyzing how corporate repoing has been inuenced by the 2030 Agenda and the SDGs, and how strategic a role panerships can play in accelerating and maximizing the impact of the private sector for achieving sustainability goals.
Since its creation, Enel has paicipated in the International Integrated Repoing Council (IIRC) and in 2020, as a member of the
In 2020, Enel continued its commitment to the Global Investors for Sustainable Development (GISD) Alliance, an integral pa of the UN Strategy for Financing the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development, of which the Group CEO is a member.
In order to dening specic sector metrics relating to the SDGs and their integration into the existing repoing frameworks, Enel has made its expeise available and established itself as leader for the "Utilities" sector in the dedicated task team.
In 2020, Enel joined the new CEO Alliance for Europe's Recovery, Reform and Resilience, an initiative that represents companies from dierent sectors, commi©ed to the implementation of the Paris Agreement and the goal of decarbonization. The CEO Alli-


ance aims to suppo the European Commission's "Next Generation EU" to prepare the transformation towards a more resilient, digitalized, prosperous and sustainable Europe for future generations. As pa of the initiative, Enel is involved in the Joint Project proposed by the companies in the alliance and is a champion of the E-Buses project led by Enel X.
Enel continued the dialogue already staed in 2019 with Consumers International. With the aim of creating a creative space for dialog on consumers and the future of sustainable energy, Enel and Consumers International organized the rst "Sustainable Energy: Insight Build Workshop".
In 2016, Enel joined the Sustainable Business Roundtable (SBRT) and in 2020 it paicipated in the two annual meetings focused on "Decarbonization" and "Impact Evaluation".
In 2020, Enel joined the S30 group of 30 Chief Sustainability Of cers from companies that are global leaders in sustainability from various industrial sectors. The S30 is intended to lead and accelerate the industry-wide transition towards a sustainable future, focusing on nature, people and the planet.
102-12 102-13

In 2020, investments with environmental, social and governance criteria continued to grow around the world. A substantial number of investors already integrate ESG issues in their investment pofolio in order to minimize nancial risk and ensure higher returns. At the same time, the change in Enel's business model towards sustainable business practices has contributed to creating value by driving the energy transition. These two elements have contributed to a©racting the attention of sustainability-oriented institutional investors, who have bought increasing amounts of the company's shares over the past ve years. At the end of 2020, ESG (active and passive) investment funds accounted for 14.6% of Enel's capital and 19.1% of oating capital, more than twice the levels in 2014. In absolute terms, there are 244 investors with investment funds who in addition to considering the Group's nancial pe¥ormance, also look at the environmental, social and governance practices that Enel is integrating into its business strategy and in all activities along the entire value chain. Fuhermore, again at the end of 2020, 47.8% of Enel's capital was held by investors who were signatories of the United Nations Principles for Responsible Investment (UN PRI).
Mobilizing public and private capital to serve the sustainable strategy is of crucial impoance for achieving the SDGs and for achieving the ambitious investment objectives set by the Strategic Plan that Enel communicated in November 2020.
2019 was a key year for Enel's sustainable nance strategy, with the launch of the rst SDG-linked bonds in the world, with the interest rate dependent on the achievement of ambitious decarbonization objectives and on the strengthening of renewable generation, marking the sta of the sustainability-linked bond market. To date, SDG-linked issues amount to 23 billion dollars6. Developing sustainable nance for Enel means pursuing a decrease in the cost of debt through transactions that link the Group's strategy to the interest rate charged on the debt contracted: an example of which is the bond issues that cost around 15 basis points less than conventional transactions.
This is why during 2020 Enel extended the sustainability-linked approach to all its debt instruments by publishing the "Sustainability-Linked Financing Framework", an all-encompassing document that governs the link between sustainability and loans, credit lines, commercial papers, and bond issues. Two Key Pe¥ormance Indicators ("KPIs") were selected for the framework: reduction of Scope 1 greenhouse gases and increase in generation from renewable sources in accordance with SDG 13 "Action to combat climate change" and 7 "Aordable and clean energy". The associated targets are reviewed on an annual basis, in line with the Group's Strategic Plan.
In May 2020, Enel signed a 5 billion euro sustainability-linked credit line, followed by a 6 billion euro commercial paper program linked to SDG 7, the rst of its kind in the world.
In October, the Group issued the world's rst sustainability-linked sterling bond, simultaneously innovating the derivatives market, with the world's rst bilateral sustainability-linked cross-currency swap, also subscribing to a fuher 1 billion euros.
The sustainability-linked nancial strategy was welcomed by the market and three main results ceify its success: in June 2020 the International Capital Markets Association (ICMA) published the new "Sustainability-Linked Bond Principles" ("SLBPs"), providing essential guidelines to the issuers of this instrument; sustainability-linked bonds multiplied during 2020, with issuers from dierent sectors and geographic areas; sustainability-linked bonds are now pa of the European Central Bank's purchase programs. Enel was also rewarded by the International Financing Review (IFR), the world's leading provider of intelligence on the global capital market, as "Sustainable Issuer of the Year", as pa of the 2020 IFR Awards. The award, which Enel won for the second consecutive year, recognized the Group's commitment to a sustainable strategy that has translated into innovation in the nance market through a new range of nancing instruments connected to the corporate sustainability-linked approach.
Finally, in March 2021, Enel and its Dutch subsidiary Enel Finance International NV signed a ve-term "Sustainability-Linked Revolving Credit Facility" woh 10 billion euros, the largest sustainable line in the world. The facility is linked to Enel's ability to reach a level of Scope 1 greenhouse gas emissions of 148 grams of CO2 per kWh by 2023 or less, in line with the Group's "Sustainability-Linked Financing Framework".
As pa of the 2020-2021 insurance renewals, Enel and Enel Insurance have placed a Propey All Risk SDG-Linked insurance program, which is the rst in the world to incorporate and integrate sustainability criteria such as the United Nations SDGs. The indicator taken into consideration is consistent with SDG 7 "Clean and aordable energy" and the achievement of the result is ceied by an independent third pay.
In 2020, 33% of Enel's gross debt was sustainable. This gure is expected to reach almost 50% by 2023 and over 70% by 2030 through renancing and the issue of new

(6) Source: Bloomberg Energy Finance BNEF. Extraction of 13.04.2021. The value includes 4.5 billion dollars relating to Enel issues.


ESG analysts and international rating agencies monitor Enel's sustainability pe¥ormance constantly. Through the application of dierent methodologies, analysts assess Group pe¥ormance in relation to environmental, social and governance topics that may be of signicance for the nancial community. ESG ratings are therefore deemed to be a strategic tool to suppo investors and identify risks and oppounities linked to the sustainability in their investment pofolio, aiding the development of active and passive sustainable investment strategies. In 2020, Enel maintained or improved its positioning in ESG ratings and indices, reaching leadership positions in most of them, as a result of the action plan dened to improve disclosure on ESG ma©ers with the various business units and lines of business, including actions aimed at dening and making public specic targets to increase the presence of women in managerial positions and the publication of the company policy against harassment, and be©er pe¥ormance in the main ESG criteria assessed.
| Rating | Ranking | Sector average | Scale (low high) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MSCI | AAA | Top 10 (n = 147) |
BBB | CCC AAA |
| Sustainalyics ESG Risk Rating |
23.6 medium risk |
24/215 electric utilities |
36.7 | 100 0 |
| S&P ESG Scores |
89 | 2/101 electric utilities |
45 | 0 100 |
| CDP | A (climate) A- (water) |
- | B B |
D A |
| Reƒnitiv ESG Rating |
89 | 1/232 electric utilities |
- | 0 100 |
| FTSE Russell ESG Rating |
5 | 1st electric utilities |
- | 0 5 |
| Vigeo Eiris ESG Rating |
76 | 1/+4,000 all sectors |
47 | 0 100 |
| ISS ESG Score |
B- | - | C- | D- A+ |
| RepRisk Rating |
31 | - | 44 | 100 0 |
| Results as at December 31, 2020 | ||||
| Main ESG indices | ||||
| ESG | ||||
| MSCI ESG Leaders |
PEOPLE
Results as at December 31, 2020
indices



AT A GLANCE
The European Commission has established a specic classication system intended to identify sustainable economic activities from an environmental perspective (known as a "taxonomy"), as an impoant enabling factor for suppo ing sustainable investments and adopting the indications of the European Green Deal.
it makes a substantial contribution to achieving one or more of the six environmental goals dened by the taxonomy (mitigation of climate changes, adaptation to climate changes, sustainable use and protection of waters and marine resources, transition to a circular economy, prevention and reduction of pollution, protection and restoration of biodiversity and ecosystems);
it does no signicant harm (DNSH) to any of the environmental objectives;
it is carried out in compliance with the minimum safeguard guarantees.
With input from the technical expe group on sustainable nance, the taxonomy regulation was published in the O cial Journal of the EU on June 22, 2020 and came into force on July 12 the same year. Staing from January 2022, companies required to publish their Consolidated Non-Financial Statement must disclose the share of their revenues, capital expenses (Capex) and operating expenses (Opex) that are qualied as sustainable from an environmental point of view.
Enel therefore analyzed the applicability of the taxonomy along the entire value chain and in all countries where it operates, with reference exclusively to the mitigation and adaptation to climate change goals, which are the only two for which the European Commission has published the draft criteria. The main results of Enel's declaration regarding the alignment of economic activities with the taxonomy are repoed in the "European Taxonomy" chapter of this document.
The focus on sustainable nance is being amplied, strengthening the commitment to key global stakeholders, through the co-chairmanship of the UN Global Compact's CFO Taskforce for the SDGs and involvement in the UN's Global Investors for Sustainable Development (GISD) Alliance.
In paicular, the CFO Taskforce has launched the "Principles on Integrated SDG Investments and Finance", a set of principles to suppo companies in the transition towards sustainable development and leverage corporate nance and investments to achieve the SDGs. Equally signicant are the results of the work carried out during the rst year of the GISD Alliance such as, for example, the denition of Sustainable Development Investing (SDI) and the launch of the Call to Action for Covid-19 bond issuance. On several occasions, the Alliance has also given its contribution to the European Commission for recommendations and repos on the new European strategy for sustainable nance. Also notewohy is the work carried out at European level, through CSR Europe, to encourage concrete actions in the eld of sustainable nance to suppo the achievement of the SDGs. In fact, at the European SDG Summit 2020, Enel established a fruitful collaboration with CSR Europe and the European Banking Federation for the organization of the European SDG Roundtable "Financing the Future: Sustainable Finance for the SDGs", dedicated to sustainable nance. On that occasion, Enel presented its sustainable nance strategy, as well as the innovative nancial instruments used by the Company to encourage and accelerate the energy transition.
Climate change and environmental degradation, an increasingly "diverse" society, demographic changes, urbanization, the evolution of cities, new technologies and inequalities are the megatrends inuencing the economic, social and environmental dimensions of sustainable development, redening our future and changing the way where we live and work. Megatrends often inuence each other and also act in combination, reinforcing their individual impacts. Climate change, for example, can strengthen rural-urban migration. Technological innovation and digitization have in several cases exacerbated income inequalities. A scenario made more complex by the Covid-19 pandemic which, in addition to being a health emergency, has turned into the deepest global recession in recent history, measurable in terms of a contraction in world GDP of around 3.7% on a year-on-year basis in 2020. The pandemic has highlighted and reinforced the existing inequalities between and within countries, with a greater negative impact on nations and groups that are less able to protect themselves, and already at greater risk of being left behind. Addressing these challenges in some cases requires a global eo, in others national policies play a decisive role, but global coordination and joint e§os can contribute to more signicant and positive changes, underlining the vital importance of multilateral consensus and collaboration.
Due to the nature of its business and its geographical distribution, the Enel Group is exposed to various types of ESG risk, identied within the reference framework relating to the risk categories adopted by Enel, which provides for six categories: strategic, nancial, operational, governance & culture, digital technology, and compliance. In paicular, the main ESG risks identied are listed below; fuher risks, mainly of a nancial nature, are repoed in the Integrated Annual Repo.
For fuher details and a description of the actions intended to mitigate their eects and ensure their correct man-

agement, please refer to the "Sound governance" chapter of this document.



The materiality analysis is the process which, with the continuous and direct involvement of stakeholders, allows the priority issues for stakeholders to be identied and assessed, weighted based on their relevance, comparing them with the Group's priorities and industrial strategy, considering the impacts suered and generated on the economy, the environment, and on people, including the impacts on human rights.
The result of this analysis is presented in the Group's priorities' matrix (or materiality matrix), which gives a comprehensive view of all the Company's stakeholders, providing a complete sustainability disclosure, as well as an integrated representation of the Company's contribution to sustainable development. Fuhermore, applying the so-called "primary users" lter – corresponding to the "nancial community"7 stakeholder – it is possible to highlight the issues that have a greater direct impact on the value of the company. The result of the analysis therefore helps to identify and dene the objectives to be included in the Strategic Plan and the Sustainability Plan - to the achievement of which the Group's various Functions and Business Lines contribute - and the topics to be covered in the Sustainability Repo.
The issues are classied into categories of business and governance ma©ers, social ma©ers, and environmental topics and represented by the priorities assigned by stakeholders (horizontal axis of the matrix) and the Company (veical axis of the matrix). The overall Group matrix considers the contributions of the main companies involved in the process, weighted according to their signicance with respect to the type of business in which they operate.
In 2020, the analysis covered 18 countries, 52 companies and 28 assets and considered 432 initiatives involving relevant stakeholders for the Group, namely business community, customers, nancial community, national and international institutions, civil society and local communities, media, employees, suppliers and contractors. During last year there has also been a signicant decrease in the use of "self-assessment", which now stands at 2% (in 2015 it was 64%) of the total of the various types of involvement envisaged, making the analysis increasingly objective and detailed.
The process allows the priorities for the Group as a whole and for each country, down to the individual Business Line/ Corporate Function and individual assets (understood as a potential or eective operating site), to be identied.
The method used was developed taking into account the guidelines of several international standards, including the Global Repoing Initiative (GRI), Sustainability Accounting Standards Board (SASB), the International Integrated Repoing Framework (IIRC), the AA1000AP AccountAbility standard (2018) and the SDG Compass, which suppos companies in adapting their strategies to comply with the UN SDGs. In paicular, the issues analyzed cover all 17 SDGs. In accordance with the most recent publications by the aforementioned reference standards, the materiality analysis is conducted with:
a dynamic approach ("dynamic materiality") by continuous monitoring of stakeholders' expectations, particularly in order to determine whether non-material issues might become material issues for the business over time;
a dual vision ("double materiality"), which allows us to assess whether the Company has an impact on society and the surrounding environment, or identify how ESG issues aect the creation of long-term value.
The materiality analysis is brought to the a©ention of the Corporate Governance and Sustainability Commi©ee at the time of the Sustainability Plan guidelines review. Moreover, the Corporate Governance and Sustainability Commi©ee and the Control and Risks Commi©ee issue preventive opinions concerning the Sustainability Repo, which includes the materiality analysis, and submit them to the Board of Directors in its meeting convened to approve the Repo.
Given the paicular nature of the reference context due to the global pandemic, the materiality analysis also took into consideration the eects of Covid-19. In paicular, the issues most aected by the pandemic recording an increase in the level of priority assigned were: occupational health and safety, paicularly the safety of contractors and employees; ecosystems and platforms, in relation to the growing need for services for the home, for citizens and for industries; innovation and digital transformation, given the acceleration in digitalization required by the pandemic crisis; and engaging local communities, given the impoance of the Company's role in ensuring adequate management of any critical issues in the territories where it operates.


Decarbonization of the energy mix
Environmental management

Includes the following issues: "New technologies and solutions for Homes and Condominiums"; "New technologies and solutions for Cities"; "New technologies and solutions for Industries"; "Electric mobility". (1)

1 2 3 4 At a Glance Our ESG peormance Trend Topic Appendix
(7) It includes: nancial institutions and respective governing bodies; investors; rating agencies and nancial analysts.
AT A GLANCE
Some of the main priority issues identied in 2020 are listed below, highlighting the reasons and stating how they are managed by the Group.
Occupational health and safety Enel considers the health, safety and psychological and physical well-being of people to be one of the Group's main priorities. Optimal management of this issue helps to generate trust and boost the commitment of people in relation to the work they pe¥orm, also helping to improve performance and raise productivity and eciency. As a conrmation of Enel's constant commitment to safety in 2020, the total combined injury Frequency Rate (FR) for internal and vendor personnel, was down by 29% compared to 2019.
Ecosystems and platforms Digitalization and the spread of new technology are accelerating the transformation of a large number of sectors. This context oers new oppounities based on the development of energy solutions that promote sustainability and make it possible to diversify the oering of the products and services the Group proposes to its customers, both inuencing the traditional business and promoting the creation of new models. Innovation of products, services or processes is a strategic priority that guarantees the Company's long-term success against the background of an increasingly competitive and demanding market. In this context, the Group has included clear and precise objectives in its 2021-2023 Sustainability Plan, aimed at dening and developing new products and services, promoting the application of new technologies in the sphere of energy eciency, electric mobility, storage, and other sustainable energy solutions. In paicular, as of 2020, Enel has installed 186,000 charging points8 and aims to install over 780,000 by 2023 and more than 4 million by 2030.
Sound governance and fair corporate conduct Enel has established a system of rules, models and control mechanisms inspired by the highest standards of transparency and fairness in management of the business, both internally and externally. This model generates trust among stakeholders, an aspect that is also reected in the economic results and in the excellent positioning achieved in 2020 in the principal ESG ratings and sustainability indices. Among the most signi-


cant results achieved, the Company gained the highest ranking ever achieved in its 17 years of presence in the Dow Jones sustainability indices.
Energy distribution – Enel works constantly to develop and improve the eciency of the distribution network, carrying out maintenance and modernization work on the existing infrastructure in all countries. This network management and development activity allows it to reduce the number and duration of service interruptions, guaranteeing its customers an adequate and constantly reliable service. Considering the key role of sma infrastructure in the energy transition, the Group has included in its 2021-2023 Sustainability Plan the installation of active sma meters for 49 million users by 2023 and more than 90 million by 2030.
Decarbonization of the energy mix The ght against climate change has become one of the key challenges facing companies. In the utilities sector in paicular, this has led to the development of regulations and public policies aimed at promoting a global zero emissions economy, in which electrication of the energy demand plays a key role. Institutional investors are devoting ever greater a©ention to the management and results of companies in relation to climate change. In this context, Enel has dened specic objectives to reduce emissions of greenhouse gases (GHG), focusing on growth of renewable capacity and gradual closure of coal-red power plants.
For fuher details about the 2021-2023 Sustainability Plan, please refer to the dedicated paragraph in this chapter.
8 Public and private charging points installed. Includes interoperability points, net of which there are 105 thousand charging points installed at the end of 2020.
Inuence impoance of the relationship for the Company
Urgency temporal dimension of the relationship
| relationship | Communication and involvement channels(1) |
Average rate of involvement per channel/type |
Main high/very high priority issues for stakeholders |
Our response to stakeholders in the chapters of the Repo€ |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Business community RELEVANCE |
Direct conctacts Forums Working groups Dedicated meetings |
daily monthly monthly weekly |
> Occupational health and safety > Environmental management > Sustainable supply chain |
"Occupational health and safety" "Environmental sustainability" "Sustainable supply chain" |
| Customers RELEVANCE |
Agents Mobile app Web channel Forums Working groups Enel stores and commercial o†ces Social media Survey |
daily continuous continuous monthly monthly daily continuous twice per year |
> Environmental management > Customer focus > Innovation and digital transformation |
"Environmental sustainability" "Electri'cation, digital and platforms" "Innovation" "Digital suppos and cyber security" |
| Financial community RELEVANCE |
Web channel Direct conctacts Investor Day Roadshow |
continuous daily once a year 4 times per year |
> Ecosystems and platforms > Sound governance and fair corporate conduct |
"Electri'cation, digital and platforms" "Sound governance" "Net-zero ambition" |
| > Decarbonization of the energy mix |

| Average rate of involvement per channel/type |
Main high/very high priority issues for stakeholders |
Our response to stakeholders in the chapters of the Repo€ |
|---|---|---|
| continuous continuous weekly daily continuous |
> Decarbonization of the energy mix > Environmental management > Energy distribution |
"Net-zero ambition" "Environmental sustainability" "Electri'cation, digital and platforms" |
| continuous continuous weekly daily continuous |
> Energy distribution > Innovation and digital transformation > Sustainable supply chain |
"Electri'cation, digital and platforms" "Innovation" "Digital suppos and cyber security" "Sustainable supply chain" |
| weekly daily weekly 4 times per year continuous |
> Decarbonization of the energy mix > Economic and 'nancial value creation > Sustainable supply chain |
"Net-zero ambition" "Sustainable supply chain" |
| continuous monthly monthly weekly continuous every 2 weeks every 2-3 months twice per year |
> Occupational health and safety > Customer focus > Decarbonization of the energy mix |
"Occupational health and safety" "Electri'cation, digital and platforms" "Net-zero ambition" |
| continuous daily monthly monthly weekly |
> Occupational health and safety > Sound governance and fair corporate conduct > People management, development and motivation |
"Occupational health and safety" "Sound governance" "Our people" |
(1) Due to the Covid-19 emergency, communication and involvement that normally take place face-to-face (such as "direct contact" or "dedicated contact") took place remotely (meetings via Teams, Skype, etc.).

102-40 102-43 102-46 102-47 103-1

Based on the results of the engagement initiatives gathered during the year, the priorities a©ributed to the analyzed issues by the various categories of stakeholders, i.e.business community, customers, nancial community, national and international institutions, civil society and local communities, media, employees, suppliers and contractors, were identied. The following tables show the categories of stakeholders with their respective degree of relevance (see the Methodological Note for fuher details), which highlight the respective communication channels used to engage stakeholders, the priority issues for each stakeholder and the answers provided by the Company in order to respond to the expectations of stakeholders and to continuously improve its pe¥ormance.
The sustainable strategy developed in recent years and the integrated business model have allowed the Group to create value for all stakeholders, beneting from the oppounities deriving from the energy transition while at the same time limiting the related risks. The Group has therefore renewed its commitment to achieving the SDGs, placing SDG 13 "Action to combat climate change" at the center. As a leader in the energy transition, Enel wants to drive generation in the future towards an ever-increasing development of renewable energy (SDG 7 "Clean and affordable energy") and the gradual phase out of coal-red plants. Fuhermore, in accordance with SDG 9 "Industry, innovation and infrastructure" and SDG 11 "Sustainable cities and communities", the Group intends to promote the electrication of consumption and the development of new services for end customers, focusing on enabling infrastructures and the development of platform models, making the most of technological and digital evolution. The aim is to accelerate the decarbonization and electrication processes to allow the global warming containment objectives to be achieved in accordance with the Paris Agreement.
Taking into account the results of the materiality analysis and in synergy with the Strategic Plan, the Group therefore denes its Sustainability Plan divided into specic objectives over a three-year period. Every year, these objectives are updated and new targets are set to ensure continuous alignment with the business strategies and the results achieved, in order to increasingly integrate sustainability along the entire value chain.
Looking ahead by anticipating global trends, ensuring its strategic positioning and identifying new key stakeholders in the sustainable development ecosystem, Enel aims to identify and take advantage of oppounities.
Through a sustainable business model based on clear and challenging objectives, the Group conrms its leading role in promoting and accelerating the energy transition, with an inclusive approach and leaving no one behind, creating long-term value for all stakeholders.




With regard to ESG backbones, the established goals are linked to the increasing aention paid to occupational health and safety, the promotion of a sustainable
-
The growth accelerators that suppo and speed up the achievement of the other goals set out in the 2021-2023 Sustainability Plan are innovation, with specic
ESG backbones
An overall view of all the targets established for each topic is repoed at the beginning of the respective chapters, in the so-called "dashboards", an example of which is shown below, indicating the target relating to the 2020-2022 Sustainability Plan, the result achieved in 2020 and the redened or added target for the new 2021-2023 Plan.
82 gCO2eq /kWh(1) , in line with the 1.5 °C scenario, as ceied by the Science Based
sustainable strategy. sustainable strategy.
in digitalization, service quality and eciency, and to increasingly adopt platform models. The main goals set for 2023 include a reduction in the average frequency and duration of interruptions (SAIFI and SAIDI) of around 12% compared to 2020
.
(1)
-
With a view to achieving complete decarbonization by 2050, Enel has fuher increased its ambition in the ght against climate change, raising its Scope 1 greenhouse gas reduction target to 80% by 2030 compared to 2017, equivalent to 82 gCO2eq /kWh(1) , in line with the 1.5 °C scenario, as ceied by the Science Based Targets initiative (SBTi). In order to achieve this target, additional renewable capacity of around 96 GW is planned for 2030 compared to 2020, reduction in convention al capacity from the current 44% to less than 20% of the total managed capacity. With a view to achieving complete decarbonization by 2050, Enel has fuher increased its ambition in the ght against climate change, raising its Scope 1 greenhouse gas reduction target to 80% by 2030 compared to 2017, equivalent to Energy transition The future of generation With a view to achieving complete decarbonization by 2050, Enel has fuher increased its ambition in the ght against climate change, raising its Scope 1 Energy transition The future of generation
economic growth (SDG 8).
The GHG Scope 1 emissions target for 2023 is 148 gCO2eq /kWh.
In order to promote usage electrication , the Group aims to increase its range of products and services and continuously improve customer satisfaction. The main objectives include the installation of 780,000 public and private charging points for electric vehicles by the end of 2023, but also rural electrication with 230,000 connections in the three-year period. Fuhermore, considering the impoant enabling role of infrastructure, paicularly for decarbonization purposes, the Plan aims to make the network increasingly exible and resilient, through investments in digitalization, service quality and eciency, and to increasingly adopt platform models. The main goals set for 2023 include a reduction in the average frequency and duration of interruptions (SAIFI and SAIDI) of around 12% compared to 2020 and the achievement of around 49 million end users with active sma meters . of around 96 GW is planned for 2030 compared to 2020, reduction in convention al capacity from the current 44% to less than 20% of the total managed capacity. In order to promote usage electrication , the Group aims to increase its range of products and services and continuously improve customer satisfaction. The main objectives include the installation of 780,000 public and private charging points for electric vehicles by the end of 2023, but also rural electrication with 230,000 connections in the three-year period. Fuhermore, considering the impoant enabling role of infrastructure, paicularly for decarbonization purposes, the Plan aims to make the network increasingly exible and resilient, through investments Electrication, digital and platforms Targets initiative (SBTi). In order to achieve this target, additional renewable capacity of around 96 GW is planned for 2030 compared to 2020, reduction in convention al capacity from the current 44% to less than 20% of the total managed capacity. In order to promote usage electrication , the Group aims to increase its range of products and services and continuously improve customer satisfaction. The main objectives include the installation of 780,000 public and private charging points for electric vehicles by the end of 2023, but also rural electrication with 230,000 connections in the three-year period. Fuhermore, considering the impoant enabling role of infrastructure, paicularly for decarbonization purposes, the Plan Electrication, digital and platforms
Industrial Environmental Social Governance Technological
Activities 2020-2022 targets 2020 results Status 2021-2023 targets Tag SDG
ing and preserving biodiversity. Growth accelerators With regard to ESG backbones, the established goals are linked to the increasing aention paid to occupational health and safety, the promotion of a sustainable supply chain, an increasingly integrated governance structure and environmental management based on reducing emissions and consumption, while also promot ing and preserving biodiversity. With regard to ESG backbones, the established goals are linked to the increasing aention paid to occupational health and safety, the promotion of a sustainable supply chain, an increasingly integrated governance structure and environmental management based on reducing emissions and consumption, while also promot -
Promoting energy transition through conversion projects with the aim of finding new solutions and ways of using them to develop energy conversion, the circular economy, while also promoting
innovation 6 48 sites involved in repurposing projects7
, including:
• Poo Tolle: construction of an open-air tourist village by a third pay; sta of demolition by the
other pay
• Augusta: construction of an innovative research and study centre in areas no longer used by the plant, dedicated to sustainable reclamation, solutions for mitigating the environmental impact of plants and infrastructures, and other areas relating to the energy sector and plant
security culture, digital suppo s, which are even more impoant in the current emergency, circular economy, which aims to reduce the impacts and use of resources along the entire value chain, and sustainable nance, which aims to signicantly increase the use of nancing instruments linked to the Group's The growth accelerators that suppo and speed up the achievement of the other goals set out in the 2021-2023 Sustainability Plan are innovation, with specic Proof of Concept targets and innovative projects adopted by the business, cyber security, with fuher aention paid to training and the dissemination of an IT security culture, digital suppo s, which are even more impoant in the current emergency, circular economy, which aims to reduce the impacts and use of resources along the entire value chain, and sustainable nance, which aims to signicantly increase the use of nancing instruments linked to the Group's The growth accelerators that suppo and speed up the achievement of the other goals set out in the 2021-2023 Sustainability Plan are innovation, with specic Proof of Concept targets and innovative projects adopted by the business, cyber security, with fuher aention paid to training and the dissemination of an IT security culture, digital suppo s, which are even more impoant in the current emergency, circular economy, which aims to reduce the impacts and use of resources along the entire value chain, and sustainable nance, which aims to signicantly increase the use of nancing instruments linked to the Group's
species
• Livorno: construction of a logistic-customs area in
the site areas
• Teruel: internal redevelopment Coal2RES conversion (combination of solar,
wind and BESS)
Sustainable construction
site
8 - promoting the adoption of the sustainable construction model (sustainable construction sites/total new construction sites)
100% renewable construction sites by 2023 100% thermal generation
sites by 2023
A high level of aention is devoted to the people who work for the Company, who are deemed to be key factors in the Group's sustainable strategy. In its role as an energy transition leader, Enel strongly promotes the development of upskilling and reskilling programs intended to develop existing professional skills and create new occupational proles. As regards diversity and inclusion, Enel is strengthening its commitment to all stages of involvement, staing from selection processes, with the aim of ensuring the 50% involvement of women, up to the highest positions, establishing the specic objective of increasing the number of women managers and middle managers in the Company. People centricity Our people A high level of aention is devoted to the people who work for the Company, who are deemed to be key factors in the Group's sustainable strategy. In its role as an energy transition leader, Enel strongly promotes the development of upskilling and reskilling programs intended to develop existing professional skills and create new occupational proles. As regards diversity and inclusion, Enel is strengthening its People centricity Our people A high level of aention is devoted to the people who work for the Company, who are deemed to be key factors in the Group's sustainable strategy. In its role as an energy transition leader, Enel strongly promotes the development of upskilling and reskilling programs intended to develop existing professional skills and create new
Sustainable construction site8 - improving the adoption of the sustainable construction site model (average adoption
rate per site
9 ) 100% by 2023
Sustainable plant promoting the adoption of the sustainable plant model (sustainable plants/ total eligible plants10
5 million beneciaries of quality education (SDG 4); Enel continues to promote the economic and social growth of the local communi Local and global communities
)
100% by 2023
(1) The GHG Scope 1 emissions target for 2023 is 148 gCO2eq /kWh. > 5 million beneciaries of quality education (SDG 4); > 20 million beneciaries of a¡ordable and clean energy (SDG 7.1); > 5 million beneciaries of quality education (SDG 4);
Sustainable plant improving the adoption of the sustainable planting model (rate of adoption of planned practices11
)
66.3% in 202112
New Goals
Redened Exceeded
102-15
NET-ZERO AMBITION
Enel continues to promote the economic and social growth of the local communi ties in which it operates with the aim of creating shared value, conrming and strengthening its specic commitment to the following SDGs in the period 2015-2030: Local and global communities establishing the specic objective of increasing the number of women managers and middle managers in the Company. the aim of ensuring the 50% involvement of women, up to the highest positions, establishing the specic objective of increasing the number of women managers and middle managers in the Company.
Reduction of specific emissions Scope 1
-70% in 2030 compared to 2017 (125 gCO2eq/kWh)
1
-49% compared to 2017 (211 gCO2eq/kWh)
20 million beneciaries of a¡ordable and clean energy (SDG 7.1); ties in which it operates with the aim of creating shared value, conrming and Enel continues to promote the economic and social growth of the local communi
1
ON-PLAN -80% in 2030
compared to 2017
8 million beneciaries of decent work and sustained, inclusive, and sustainable economic growth (SDG 8). strengthening its specic commitment to the following SDGs in the period 2015-2030: ties in which it operates with the aim of creating shared value, conrming and strengthening its specic commitment to the following SDGs in the period
Development of additional renewable capacity and reduction of thermal
capacity
+14.1 GW of renewable
capacity 3 -6.2 GW of thermal
capacity 4 3.1 GW of additional renewable capacity
3
-3.3 GW of thermal
capacity 4 ON-PLAN Approx. +96 GW
additional renewable
capacity
3 in 2021-2030 <20% of conventional capacity over total
capacity 3
Implementation of environmental international best practices to selected coal
plants
187 mil euros of environmental investments
6.5 mil euros OFF-PLAN
Target exceeded in view of the evolution of the Group's
strategy
MBA-PhD training about resilience in the countries where the Group operates 600 people involved 238 people involved ON-PLAN 600 people involved
Greater use of sustainable financing sources (sustainable finance instruments/total financial
instruments)
43% by 2022 33% ON-PLAN 48% by 2023
IAASG
ASTI
(6) Third-pay project initiatives could be developed where in-house redevelopment is not feasible.
(7) Includes sites already decommissioned, to be decommissioned, in operation and with hybridisation currently ongoing with other technologies. (8) The perimeter of the sustainable site model also includes sites undergoing renovation and repowering (turbine replacement, gas upgrading, etc.). (9) The rate of adoption of sustainable construction practices is the ratio between the practices adopted and the catalogue priority practices according to the
sites' technical characteristics.
(10) Eligible plants are the sites achieving a positive result in the annual assessment on all sites. Not included are plants with zero planned generation, small plants (<1 MW) with low local impact, plants for sale or being phased out, BSO plants with restrictions due to external panerships and plants with hand-overs in the
second half of 2020.
(11) The adoption rate of sustainable planting practices is the ratio of adopted practices to catalogue planned practices. Planned practices are determined
following an assessment of the specic aspects of individual plants.
(12) The KPI only considers practices from the 2020 Sustainable Plant Catalogue as mapped out in the 2020 Feasibility Map.
(1) The target included in the 2020-2022 Plan and ceied by the Science-Based Targets initiative (SBTi) in September 2019 only referred to CO
2 emissions
from thermal generation, which account for around 99% of Scope 1 emissions, under the new target included in the 2021-2023 Plan. In 2020, the value for
all Scope 1 emissions is 214 gCO2eq/kWh, down 48% compared to 2017.
(2) The 2030 Scope 1 emissions reduction target was redened and ceied by SBTi in October 2020. Following this redenition, Scope 1 specic emissions in
2023 will be 148 gCO2eq/kWh. (3) Includes managed capacity. (4) Includes nuclear. (5) The 2030 target is >70%.
AIAIAIAI
greenhouse gas reduction target to 80% by 2030 compared to 2017, equivalent to

aims to make the network increasingly exible and resilient, through investments in digitalization, service quality and eciency, and to increasingly adopt platform models. The main goals set for 2023 include a reduction in the average frequency and duration of interruptions (SAIFI and SAIDI) of around 12% compared to 2020


.

ing and preserving biodiversity.
sustainable strategy.
(1)
occupational proles. As regards diversity and inclusion, Enel is strengthening its
-
2015-2030:
20 million beneciaries of a¡ordable and clean energy (SDG 7.1);
economic growth (SDG 8).
The GHG Scope 1 emissions target for 2023 is 148 gCO2eq /kWh.

TOPIC VIEW


We have stepped up our e§os to ght climate change and are focusing on electrication, digital and platforms
We pay close a©ention to the people who work for the Company and strive to advance the economic and social growth of the local communities where we operate
Innovation, Circular Economy, Digital Media and Cyber Security are our growth accelerators
Our sustainable business model is based on: the sustainable supply chain, occupational health and safety, environmental concerns and sound governance



Promoting energy transition through conversion projects with the aim of finding new solutions and ways of using them to develop energy conversion, the circular economy, while also promoting innovation6
New
Goals
Redened Outdated
102-15

| 1 At a Glance |
2 | 3 Our ESG peormance |
Trend Topic | 4 | Appendix | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Priorities Decarbonization of the B |
Plan | SDG | ||||
| energy mix Economic and 'nancial F value creation |
The future of generation Target |
|||||
| Activities | 2020-2022 targets | 2020 results | Status | 2021-2023 targets | Tag | SDG |
| Reduction of specific emissions Scope 1 |
-70% in 2030 compared to 2017 (125 gCO2eq/kWh)1 |
-49% compared to 2017 (211 gCO2eq/kWh)1 |
ON-PLAN | -80% in 2030 compared to 2017 (82 gCO2eq/kWh)2 |
E | |
| Development of additional renewable capacity and reduction of thermal capacity |
+14.1 GW of renewable capacity3 -6.2 GW of thermal capacity4 |
3.1 GW of additional renewable capacity3 -3.3 GW of thermal capacity4 |
ON-PLAN | Approximately +96 GW additional renewable capacity3 in 2021-2030 <20% of conventional capacity over total capacity3 |
I E |
|
| Implementation of environmental international best practices to selected coal plants |
187 mil euros of environmental investments |
6.5 mil euros | OFF-PLAN | Target exceeded in view of the evolution of the Group's strategy |
E | |
| MBA-PhD training about resilience in the countries where the Group operates |
600 people involved | 238 people involved | ON-PLAN | 600 people involved | E S G |
|
| Greater use of sustainable financing sources (sustainable finance instruments/total financial instruments) |
43% by 2022 | 33% | ON-PLAN | 48% by 20235 | I E |
Industrial Environmental Social Governance Technological E
| Activities | 2020-2022 targets | 2020 results | Status | 2021-2023 targets | Tag | SDG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Promoting energy transition through conversion projects with the aim of finding new solutions and ways of using them to develop energy conversion, the circular economy, while also promoting innovation6 |
48 sites involved in repur posing projects7 , including: • Poo Tolle: construction of an open-air tourist village by a third pay; sta of demolition by the counterpay • Augusta: construction of an innovative research and study centre in areas no longer used of the plant, dedicated to sustainable reclamation, solutions for mitigating the environ mental impact of plants and infrastructures, and other areas relating to the energy sector and plant species • Livorno: construction of a logistic-customs area in the site areas • Teruel: internal redevelop ment Coal2RES conver sion (combination of solar, wind and BESS) |
I E S T |
||||
| Sustainable construction site8 - promoting the adoption of the sustainable construction model (sustainable construction sites/total new construction sites) |
100% renewable construction sites by 2023 100% thermal generation sites by 2023 |
I E |
||||
| Sustainable construc tion site8 - improving the adoption of the sustain able construction site model (average adoption rate per site9) |
100% by 2023 | I E |
||||
| Sustainable plant - promoting the adoption of the sustainable plant model (sustainable plants/ total eligible plants10) |
100% by 2023 | I E |
||||
| Sustainable plant - improving the adoption of the sustainable planting model (rate of adoption of planned practices11) |
66.3% in 202112 | I E |
(6) Third-pay project initiatives could be developed where in-house redevelopment is not feasible.
(7) Includes sites already decommissioned, to be decommissioned, in operation and with hybridisation currently ongoing with other technologies.
(8) The perimeter of the sustainable site model also includes sites undergoing renovation and repowering (turbine replacement, gas upgrading, etc.). (9) The rate of adoption of sustainable construction practices is the ratio between the practices adopted and the catalogue priority practices according to the
sites' technical characteristics. (10) Eligible plants are the sites achieving a positive result in the annual assessment on all sites. Not included are plants with zero planned generation, small plants (<1 MW) with low local impact, plants for sale or being phased out, BSO plants with restrictions due to external panerships and plants with hand-overs in the
second half of 2020. (11) The adoption rate of sustainable planting practices is the ratio of adopted practices to catalogue planned practices. Planned practices are determined following an assessment of the specic aspects of individual plants.
(12) The KPI only considers practices from the 2020 Sustainable Plant Catalogue as mapped out in the 2020 Feasibility Map.
(1) The target included in the 2020-2022 Plan and ceied by the Science-Based Targets initiative (SBTi) in September 2019 only referred to CO2 emissions from thermal generation, which account for around 99% of Scope 1 emissions, under the new target included in the 2021-2023 Plan. In 2020, the value for all Scope 1 emissions is 214 gCO2eq/kWh, down 48% compared to 2017.
(2) The 2030 Scope 1 emissions reduction target was redened and ceied by SBTi in October 2020. Following this redenition, Scope 1 specic emissions in 2023 will be 148 gCO2eq/kWh.
(3) Includes managed capacity. The value of the additional consolidated capacity is 2.9 GW in 2020.
(4) Includes nuclear.
(5) The 2030 target is >70%.
Enel is commi©ed to developing a business model in line with the goals of the Paris Agreement (COP 21) to limit the average increase in global temperature to less than 2 °C above pre-industrial levels (1850-1900) and to continue to limit this increase to 1,5 °C.
For this reason, Enel has set itself the objective of reaching the decarbonization of its energy mix by 2050, as announced publicly in 2015 when the United Nations launched its Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), with paicular reference to SDG 13 "Climate action".
Fuhermore, Enel, as a signatory to the Business Ambition for 1,5 °C campaign promoted by the United Nations and other institutions, is commi©ed to xing a long-term objective for reaching net zero emissions along the value chain by 2050, together with intermediate targets in all the peinent areas and in line with the criteria and recommendations of the Science Based Targets initiative (SBTi). As a result, in October 2020 Enel announced a new objective of reducing its direct emissions of greenhouse gases per kWheq 80% by 2030, in comparison to the year of reference 2017, ceied by SBTi and consistent with the purpose of limiting global warning to 1,5 °C. This new commitment requires that by 2030, the Group's direct emissions are equal to 82 gCO2eq/kWh compared to 125 gCO2eq/kWh corresponding to the previous objective of a 70% reduction that was announced in 2019.
Paicular a©ention is placed on the climate change adaptation policies in order to increase the resilience of the assets along the entire value chain, thereby limiting potentially negative impacts and guaranteeing a safe and sustainable energy service in all the countries in which the Group operates.
In order to guarantee increased transparency in its communications and relationships with its stakeholders, Enel periodically repos on its related activities in line with the international standards of the GRI (Global Repoing Initiative) and the Sustainability Accounting Standards Board (SASB), and is publicly commi©ed to adopting the recommendations of the Task force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures (TCFD) of the Financial Stability Board, which in June 2017 published specic recommendations for the voluntary repoing of the nancial impact of climate risks. The Group has also integrated the "Guidelines on repoing climate-related information" published by the European Commission in June 2019.
102-15 103-2 103-3 201-2
Energy transition will represent an impoant growth and modernization accelerator for the industry thanks to the potential it oers in terms of economical development. The progressive replacement of fossil fuels with renewables will permit a greater use of electricity in the energy system, with positive repercussions in economic, environmental and social terms. To fully benet from these oppounities, forward-looking policies are required to ensure a fair and inclusive transition that does not leave anyone behind and that considers in paicular the needs of the social categories most exposed to the change, such as communities that base their economy on coal mining. If in fact energy transition will lead, in some generation sectors, to a reduction in the number of jobs, it is necessary to be ready to create new job and requalication oppounities.
In this context, Enel, as a signatory to the commitment promoted by the United Nations on a fair transition, is commi©ed to accelerating the energy transition, guaranteeing that the new jobs created will be fair, decent and inclusive. In paicular, it is commi©ed to:
› promoting social dialog with workers and union representatives, in compliance with the workers' rights established by the International Labour Organization (ILO), encouraging social protection (including pensions and healthcare) and salary guarantees, also in line with ILO directives;
› collaborating with suppliers who respect these standards, at the same time contributing toward the social-economic development of the local communities most exposed to the passage from fossil fuels to renewables.
Enel follows the approach of "think globally, act locally", based on which the Futur-e initiative has been developed, which promotes an inclusive transition in the areas surrounding the power plants that are undergoing this energy transition. Futur-e is the rst example in the world of requalication on a large scale of an industrial area that uses an approach based on the circular economy; a vast and unique program designed to nd new uses for obsolete power plants. New, innovative and sustainable uses that reuse existing structures, infrastructures and connections, with the involvement of local stakeholders to create value for local communities through sustainable economic growth and the creation of jobs.
A strategy is being prepared for the in line regeneration of all sites to be reconveed, in compliance with the following fundamental principles:
› integrating site personnel through a process of reassignment within the Group in order to avoid redundancies
Administration, Finance and Control
Progress towards a net-zero model opens up new markets of unimaginable size. Having anticipated this trend in time, Enel can now be the undisputed leader of this transition.
To accelerate the energy transition means rethinking the way in which we live and progress,for both our and future generations benefit.
A net-zero economy requires a new way of doing business and finance, a combination that must fully integrate the concept of sustainability and the shared value creation.
SPECIFIC GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS (SCOPE 1)
80 %
%



214 gCO2eq/kWh
87 EBITDA for low-carbon products, services and technologies
1 2 3 4
At a Glance Our ESG peormance Trend Topic Appendix
and any loss of know-how, also involving trade unions to make sure that the various expectations of employees are satised;
The Futur-e initiative was staed in 2015 in Italy, with the purpose of giving new life to the power plants being closed (for a total of 13 GW). The approach, which proved to be successful, was therefore extended to the entire Group and will concern a pofolio of more than 40 sites on a global level.
Given the new energy-industry context, Enel's decarbonization strategy is in line with the national, European and global strategies that orient energy development toward sustainable technologies. The Group has expanded the requalication oppounities thanks to the possibility of replacing the thermal energy generation sites mainly with new renewable or hybrid power plants, integrating new business projects with complementary sustainable investments that satisfy the needs of the communities where the structures are located. These projects are located, in particular:
and Carboneras in Almería;
› in South America, for example, with the power plants of Tarapacá and Bocamina in Chile, where Enel is integrating the approach of fair transition, proceeding with the progressive closure of coal-red generation (Tarapacá and Bocamina I already closed, Bocamina II with closure planned in 2022).
During 2020, Enel also staed a collaboration with CSR Europe in order to promote a high-level dialogue for a fair and inclusive transition, which has involved a wide range of key players, such as: the European Commission, environmental organizations and labor institutions, European think tanks, private sector and youth associations. The initiative is targeted toward exploring the challenges related to the transition toward a low-carbon economy, also in light of the impacts deriving from the Covid-19 pandemic, in order to create a roadmap of concrete actions that can be actually used by companies with regard to work and employment, consumption and life style, as well as nance and investments.
Enel promotes the involvement of its main external and internal stakeholders in order to increase their awareness and develop a constructive dialogue that can provide a valuable contribution toward the creation of solutions that mitigate climate change and create value for the Group. The most relevant actions carried out in 2020 include:
of encouraging responsible energy consumption by collecting the opinions of expes on energy eciency through aicles, digital meetings and by suppoing various sector initiatives;
› raising the awareness of local communities: with the Creating Shared Value (CSV) model, Enel is involving local communities, making them aware of topics con-

In line with the commitment made for a fair and inclusive transition, Enel is promoting the Futur-e initiative at the coal-red power plant in Andorra, Teruel (1,101 MW). The project represents an investment of more than 1,487 million euros and has the nal objective of installing 1,725 MW of renewable energy, of which 1,585 MW from solar power, constructing the largest plant for this technology in Europe, and 140 MW from wind power. The project also includes a large-scale energy storage system of up to 160 MW.
The Futur-e project for Andorra includes:
between four and six years and create approximately 130 jobs with a maximum of 200 workers employed at peak times. In the following phase, the renewable plants will create approximately 4,000 jobs during construction, and 138 positions for 25 years in operational and maintenance areas;
The project for Andorra will also include an investment of 294 million euros for the installation of a 60 MW electrolyzer that generates renewable hydrogen. This project is included in the 23 initiatives presented to the Ministry of Ecological Transition for the development of this technology in Spain. A pa of the renewable capacity that will be placed in operation in Teruel could therefore be dedicated to the generation of hydrogen, which would involve the creation of 144 jobs during the construction of the electrolyzer and 65 permanent positions for operation and maintenance.
nected to climate change and explaining how renewables are an extremely eective solution, with benets not only for the environment but also for the creation of new jobs and for social-economic development;
› raising the awareness of our people: Enel involves all the people that work for the Company in awareness activities in order to increase their involvement in climate change aspects and promote a culture of innovation and business entrepreneurship on a global level to overcome the energy challenges. Enel Days 2020, which are annual company events, promoted discussions and exchanges about topics such as electrication, decarbonization, digitalization and urbanization. The main priorities of the Strategic Plan for the next three years were presented, in line with what was communicated to the nancial community during the Capital Markets Day.
Within its advocacy on climate change the Enel Group is rmly commi©ed to:
al and national trade associations.
Enel's policy advocacy aims to promote the decarbonization strategy of the Group and pursue the Paris Agreement goals, engaging institutional stakeholders, trade associations, non-governmental organizations and academia in order to promote our view on climate and low-carbon policies. The engagement activity with stakeholders contributes to the evolution of the regulatory frameworks towards ambitious climate goals and promotes an economy where the EU ETS drives long term investment. To do so Enel interacts directly with policy makers, contributes do the positioning of trade association, interacts with a wider set of stakeholder to create consensus and suppo on specic policy proposals.
According to this policy, the Group has signed the "Uniting Business and Governments to Recover Be©er" statement in 2020, a call that gathers the signatories from SBTi and Business Ambition for 1.5 to encourage governments to prioritize the climate emergency despite of the economic and health crisis.
As a strong suppoer of carbon pricing, Enel advocates for its integration in policy making throughout the countries in which it operates. In doing so it emphasizes the importance of well-functioning carbon tax and emission trading mechanisms able to deliver sho to medium term predictability suppoing market eciency as well as strong long term price signals to suppo long term investments and innovation.
Global coordination of Enel's global public policy positioning on climate is ensured through the Energy and Low-Carbon Policy Unit. Such unit has the responsibility of developing global outlooks and position papers on climate policies. The la©er serve as guidance for Enel's national and local advocacy as well as engagement with institutions and the wider range of stakeholders active within the climate debate. In such respect Enel is also commi©ed at working to ensure continued and full alignment with the goals of the Paris Agreement of any association of which it is a member. At the national level, Enel's commitment on public advocacy is pursued through specic advocacy activities as well as wider stakeholder engagement on the themes of decarbonization and the energy transition. The approach is similar to the one adopted at the global level. Advocacy goals include the promotion of greater climate ambition, carbon pricing, the accelerated penetration of RES technologies, infrastructure development and upgrade through sma grid technologies to suppo the energy transition, electrication as a mean of decarbonizing nal energy uses. Fuhermore, through its "Energy Transition Roadmap" engagement platforms Enel engages with a wide range of stakeholders on the actions needed at the national level to pursue the goals of the Paris Agreement. Such platforms assume as a staing point decarbonization in line with the Paris Agreement by 2050, they then proceed in identifying the technological mix necessary to achieve such long term target in 2050 as well as the medium term one of 2030, to then proceed in developing specic policy recommendation aimed at achieving such transformation. All of such activities are suppoed by a continuous engagement with a wide set of stakeholders.
Several regulatory and legislative events occurred in 2020 are relevant for Enel's business and advocacy actions. In light of the increased streamlining of the climate challenge within wider global, national, regional and local policy and regulation, the number of dossiers within which Enel focuses its climate advocacy has been increasing every year. Enel's positioning on such main dossiers is presented below.

pricing should take the form of environmental taxation in countries with weaker institutional and sectors characterized by distributed emission sources and where non-economic barriers are relevant. The Enel Group strongly suppos carbon pricing as a means to eciently and eectively decarbonize economic systems around the globe. Enel views on the implementation of carbon pricing have been conveyed directly and through the paicipation in the activities of IETA, CPLC, Eurelectric and WBCSD (World Business Council on Sustainable Development). In 2020 specific streams of activities have been devoted to analysis and advocacy on carbon pricing, at global, regional (EU and Latin America), and national levels (EU Member States, Chile, Colombia, and Peru).
policies should not "leave anyone behind".
emissions from a structural point of view, taking into account the impact of direct and indirect methane emissions in terms of climate warming and air quality when planning new investments and assessing new energy and climate policies.

tric mobility as the key factor in reducing emissions from road transpo, reaching EU energy eciency objectives and represent the clear pathway towards zero-emission mobility goal of EU. The electrication of transpo sector will increase European energy independency and unlock exibility benets for the grids to be©er integrate renewable energy sources. The commitment of the European power sector to fully decarbonize electricity "well before 2050" will also contribute to decarbonize the transpo sector. To reach the overarching emissions reduction goals of European Union and allow the decarbonization of transpo sector it is crucial the rapid and full-deployment of electromobility at EU level.
Fuhermore, Enel's advocacy highlighted the methodological need to develop appropriate circular economy metrics on one hand, while on the other focus on the high potential urban environment through the implementation of clear sma city circular visions.
› Within the Zero Pollution dossier and other environmental dossiers the Enel Group is actively promoting maximizing the synergies between decarbonization policies and other environmental policies. Within such context the synergies between climate and air quality policies is maybe the most critical one and electric technologies can play a key role in ghting climate change, improving local air quality and increasing the circularity of the EU economic system. Land and soil management is vital to a circular economy and therefore the new soil strategy should consider the re-purposing of decommissioned industrial sites and reuse of brown elds to avoid fuher land take and soil pollution.
In addition to the position outlined above on specic issues, the Enel Group actively contributes within the debate of how to best upscale action to address the climate change challenge. Such activities included the following:
electrication and sustainable energy development. Enel's advocacy activities during the 2019-2020 presidency of the alliance led to the GSEP's annual repo "Building the electrication alliance: Bridging along and across value chains" launched through a global viual event in late November.
102-12 102-13
The Group plays an active role in various sector associations and organizations with the objective of promoting topics regarding energy transition and climate commitment on a national and global level.
Enel commits to ensure that the various industrial associations and think tanks to which it is a member operate in compliance with the goals of the Paris Agreement. Therefore, Enel systematically checks the consistency of the associations' positions with the climate policies shared at Group level. This process is guaranteed at two stages: (i) before joining the Association, though an indepth analysis of the entity's statute; (ii) after joining the Association, either by taking positions of responsibility within the Association or by inuencing the associations' positioning within the working groups.
Where the association external positioning is not aligned with Enel's own view, the company assesses whether the misalignment might be harmful for the eectiveness of Enel's own advocacy and positioning and might eventually decide to step out of the association. As an example, in the last years, we have withdrawn our paicipation in some associations whose view on climate policies and on how to deliver the energy transition was persistently different from our own.
For what specically concerns the European framework, in 2020 Enel engaged in various energy relevant associations (foremost Eurelectric, Wind Europe, Solar Power Europe, EASE, EDSO, SmaEn) and prestigious think tanks (Bruegel, Friends of Europe) as well as in some sustainability policy oriented initiatives, holding also relevant positions in their governance systems. In paicular, the most relevant developments over the course of 2020 are:

› appointment of Enel President in Solar Power Europe (solar PV leading association in Europe).
Enel inuences the associations' activities on the decarbonization policies thanks to the paicipation of Enel representative in the working groups and through studies and policy papers. As the EU and national governments set out to implement a range of climate policies, Eurelectric and the Enel Foundation launched the ag-ship study, "E-quality". The study provided an analysis of how some types of policies aect households with dierent incomes, what can be done to address any dispropoionate eects and what will be the impact of Covid-19 crisis in this process. In October 2020, as EU was preparing to launch the Recovery package that aimed to speed up the climate transition to climate neutrality by 2050 while at the same time reigniting the EU economy, Eurelectric advocated for this package to suppo the digital and climate transition.
Some of the international associations with which Enel collaborated actively in 2020 are listed below.


| Main Climate Policy Positions | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry association |
Description | Level of alignment to Enel Climate position |
Main actions | Enel's main role in the association |
Main actions developed in 2020 |
| Eurelectric | The Union of the Electricity Industry - Eurelectric is the sector association which represents the common interests of the electricity industry at pan-European level, plus its aŒliates and associates on several other continents. The association counts over 34 full mem bers, representing over 3.500 companies in Europe. |
High | Eurelectric contributes to the development and competitive ness of the electricity industry, provides e˜ective representa tion for the industry in public a˜airs and promotes the role of a low-carbon electricity mix. |
Enel is well represen ted in the association, with over 40 repre sentatives from Group companies in Italy, Spain and Romania, holding key positions within the associa tion (at decision level structures – Com mi©ees, such as the Electrication and Su stainability Commi©ee or the Sustainability Working Group. |
Co-conduction of studies (e.g. "E-Quality") Suppo– for the studies on grids, consumers and •eet electrication. Suppo–ing positions on the Recovery package denition. Enel chairmanship of the Eu ropean Social dialogue during 2020 tackling ma©ers like just energy transition and upskil ling/reskilling programs in par tnership with Trade Unions. |
| Wind Europe | Wind Europe is the voice of the wind industry, actively promoting wind power in Europe and worldwide, with over 450 members and active in over 40 countries. |
High | Through e˜ective communi cation and its engagement in the political decision-making processes, Wind Europe facili tates national and international policies and initiatives that strengthen the development of European and global wind energy markets. |
Enel has been pa– of the Board and is active in more than 12 wor king groups and task forces. |
Enel has been active specially in the main policy topics like "Inception Impact Assessment for the revision of Directive (EU) 2018/2001 on the promotion of the use of energy from renewable sources" through the WG Electrication and WG Market & Regulation. |
| SolarPower Europe |
SolarPower Europe is a member-led association representing organizations active along the whole value chain, aiming to shape the regulatory envi ronment and to enhance business oppo–unities for solar power in Europe. |
High | Some of the objectives of the association refer to succes sfully positioning solar-based energy solutions with policy makers at the European level, producing thought leading energy market analysis, ensu ring solar-based energy solu tions have access to nancing and funding. |
In March 2020, Enel sta–ed to hold the Presidency of Solar Power Europe. |
During 2020, Enel had an acti ve role in the Emerging Mar kets Workstream, in pa–icular in the draft of SolarPower's position paper "The role of solar in the Green Deal Diplo macy", the EU Strategy with Africa and the global green recovery. |
| The European Association for Storage of En ergy (EASE) |
EASE is the leading mem ber-suppo–ed association representing organizations active across the entire energy storage value chain. |
Medium | EASE promotes the role of energy accumulation in a de carbonized energy system. |
During 2020 Enel sta–ed to hold the Presidency of the as sociation. Enel is also present in the various commi©ees such as Technical and Value Assessment Commit tee and Strategy Com mi©ee and various task forces and working groups. |
Contribution to the Associa tion's response on the EC con sultation on "sustainability and sma– mobility strategy" and "Future EU Strategy for Sma– Sector Integration" and wor ked on many position papers such as "Hydrogen strategy". |
| Bruegel | Bruegel is the most impor tant European think tank specializing in economics. |
Medium | Bruegel carried out some stu dies and policy papers on ener gy transition (e.g. "Green indu strial policy" blueprint issued in December). |
Enel holds a position in the Board, contributing to focus the think tank a©ention on the Green Deal and overall sustai nability topics. |
In March, Enel suppo–ed Brue gel in organizing an event "Em powering the recovery" where Mr. Starace and Mrs. Kadri Simson - European Commis sioner for Energy - a©ended as speakers. |
| Main Climate Policy Positions | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry association |
Description | Level of alignment to Enel Climate position |
Main actions | Main actions developed in 2020 |
|
| Friends of Eu rope |
Friends of Europe is one of the most in•uential think tanks in Europe that aims at stimulating discussion on key global and European issues that span political, economic, social and envi ronmental challenges. |
Medium | To suppo– energy transition and climate commitment poli cies, Friends of Europe usually publishes a–icles on its website and organizes events with in dustry, institutional representa tives and civil society. |
Enel is a key member and therefore pa–ici pates in the State of Europe debate which is the biggest and most high-level event organized by Friend of Europe in Brussels every year. |
In 2020 Enel pa–icipated at high level events: one is "Euro pe's climate and energy sum mit 2020" and the other "Shi fting investments for a green recovery" where Albe–o De Paoli a©ended talking about the role of private sector in sustainable nance. |
| Sma"En | Sma–En is the association of market players driving digital and decentralized energy solutions. |
High | Sma–En brings about the ener gy transition by intelligent coo peration between consumption, distribution, transmission and generation, acting as equal pa–ners in an integrated energy system. |
Enel takes pa– in the association, having a representative in the Board and also at wor king group and task force level. |
Enel had a relevant contribu tion in the implementation of the Electricity Market Design to Drive Demand-Side Flexibi lity repo–. |
| RES4Africa | RES4Africa gathers a network of international leaders from across the clean energy value chain and suppo–s the creation of an enabling environ ment for renewables investments and strategic pa–nerships. RES4Africa functions as a bridge between members and pa–ners of emerging |
High | The initiative called "renewAfrica" was oŒcially launched at Euro pean level. It is a European mul ti-stakeholder backed initiative to accelerate Africa's sustainable energy transition. It seeks to catalyze transformational re newable energy investments that will foster the continent's future sustainable development. RES4Africa is a member of the Africa-Europe Foundation, a new |
Enel Green Power is one of the funding members and holds the presidency of the Association. |
Enel is well represented within the 4 task forces created, in pa–icular representatives from Enel Brussels oŒce are in the Advocacy task force suppor ting the organization of me eting with the main European Institutions representatives. |
| markets for an exchan ge of perspectives and expe–ise. |
platform founded by Friends of Europe and Mo Ibrahim Founda tion to facilitate multistakeholder dialog, catalyze collaboration and unlock new oppo–unities that can transform dialogue into action. In pa–icular, RES4Africa is mem ber of the Africa Europe Strategy Group on Sustainable Energy |
||||
| Sustainable Energy for all (SEforAll) |
SEforAll is an international non-prot organization - launched as an initia tive from former United Nations Secretary General Ban Ki-moon - which col laborates with the private sector, civil society, insti tutions and governments to suppo– the sustainable development goal on energy (SDG 7). |
High | Enel has been a pa–ner of SE forAll since 2011 and the Enel's CEO was appointed chairman of the organization's Administrati ve Board in 2020, a position he will hold until 2023. |
Enel was pa–icularly active in 2020, also in light of the Chair manship of the CEO on the Board, and collaborated with the organization for the denition of the new 2021-2023 workplan, centered on four pil lars: Energy Diplomacy and Advocacy, Energy Access and Closing |
SEforALL suppo–s the pro gress of SDG 7 and the Paris Agreement. In fact, the orga nization pursues the targets of SDG 7 aimed at: guaran teeing access to a˜ordable, reliable and modern energy services, increasing the share of renewable energy in total energy consumption by 2030 and doubling the global rate of energy eŒciency impro vement. |

the Gap, Energy Transitions and Climate and Intersection with Other SDGs.
102-18 102-19 102-20 102-26 102-29 102-30 102-31 102-35 102-36
Enel's organizational and corporate governance model denes specic tasks and responsibilities for which the Company's main governance bodies are responsible, guaranteeing that the risks and oppounities related to climate change are suitably taken into consideration during all impoant company decision-making processes.
just transition and decarbonization, with planned upskilling and reskilling programs, (iii) the analysis of the expectations of investors regarding climate change by means of updates for the relative engagement activities, (iv) the inclusion of the fight against climate change and the reduction in direct and indirect emissions among the parameters taken into consideration for analyzing the Group's positioning with regard to its peers;
› is supported with regard to climate change mainly by two committees of directors: the Corporate Governance and Sustainability Committee and the Control and Risk Committee.

› supports the Board of Directors in the assessments and decisions relating to the compensation of the directors and key management personnel. In this regard, compensation policy for 2020 specifies that the short- and long-term variable compensation of the Chief Executive Officer/General Manager and key management personnel is connected, among others, to performance objectives concerning sustainability and climate.
Enel has a management team that assigns the responsibilities related to climate topics to the specific Functions that contribute toward guiding Enel's leadership in energy transition. Each area is responsible for managing the risks and opportunities related to climate change for their own area of competence.
The Holding Functions are responsible for consolidating the scenario analysis and managing the strategic and financial planning process aimed toward promoting a sustainable business model by putting the fight against climate change at the center of its strategy.
The Global Business Lines are responsible for the development of activities related to promoting renewable generation, the optimization of heat capacity, the digitalization of the electricity grid and the development of business solutions that enable energy transition and the fight against climate change.
The Global Service Functions are responsible for adopting sustainable criteria, including climate change, in supply chain management and developing digital solutions that develop the development of technologies enabling energy transition and the fight against climate change.
On a local level, the Regions and Countries have the task of promoting decarbonization and guiding the energy transition toward a low-carbon business model, within their areas of responsibility. Furthermore, the Europe Function is responsible for defining the Group's position on climate change, low-carbon policies and the regulation of the international carbon market on a European level.
Additionally, the Group Investments Committee, chaired by the Chief Executive Officer, grants approval for the expenses for investments related to business development. This committee also has the task of guaranteeing that all investments are fully in line with the Group's commitment to promoting a low-carbon business model and reaching decarbonization by 2050.
The Company's remuneration policy includes dierent mechanisms in order to progress toward energy transition, in paicular:
over the next three years, which represents 10% of total long-term variable retribution. Fuhermore, the new Long-Term Incentive (LTI) system assigned to the CEO and top management for 2020 includes for the rst time a new objective related to the growth of renewable net consolidated installed capacity in comparison to the total net consolidated installed capacity, which represents 15% of the long-term variable retribution.
102-15 103-2 103-3 201-2
Electric energy is essential to guarantee the sustainable progress of modern societies and represents a key factor in reaching the goals of the United Nations 2030 Agenda, in paicular SDG 7, to guarantee everyone accessible, reliable, sustainable and modern energy, and SDG 13, regarding climate action.
The generation of electricity has always played a key role in climate change, as the use of fossil fuels is a considerable source of greenhouse gas emissions. Technological development, in paicular in the area of renewable energies, has however completely transformed this scenario by making electricity one of the main solutions for reducing the carbon footprint world-wide. Enel is aware of these impacts and implements specic actions to minimize them, promoting the decarbonization of the energy system and the electrication of the energy demand. As a result this reduces the greenhouse gas emissions along the entire value chain.
Enel's generation from fossil fuels (mainly coal and gas) has traditionally represented the main source of greenhouse gas emissions. In paicular, in 2020 the direct emissions (Scope 1) related to generation from fossil fuels were equal to about 44.8 mil teq CO2, whereas indirect emissions (Scope 3) related to the extraction and transpo of fuels were equal to 1.2 mil teq of CO2 (also considering those related to the transpo of raw materials). Enel is reducing this impact by accelerating the decommissioning of coal-red plants, with a reduction of capacity in 2020 equal to 2.8 GW compared to 2019. In parallel, the Group is increasing the development of renewable capacity that, together with the contribution of nuclear generation, has avoided 74.8 mil teq of CO2 emissions. Fuhermore, Enel is actively commi©ed to the development of electricity storage systems that suppo the integration of renewable capacity, with a total installed capacity of 123 MW in 2020. The decarbonization of the energy mix also has a positive impact on the

reduction of indirect greenhouse gas emissions (Scope 2) associated with the acquisition of electricity to cover the requirements of business activities.
The management of the electricity grid involves the generation of indirect greenhouse gas emissions (Scope 2) associated with technical energy losses on the grid, equal to 3.6 mil teq of CO2 in 2020 (according to the "location based" calculation methodology). Enel is actively investing in the digitalization and automation of the electricity grid to reduce these losses and increase reliability, while promoting the diusion of renewables in the energy system.
With regard to the end customer, even if Enel does not have a direct impact in terms of greenhouse gas emissions in the retail market, the use of products sold by its own customers generates greenhouse gas emissions that are accounted for as indirect emissions (Scope 3). In paicular, the emissions connected to the use of electricity sold to customers equaled approximately 25.0 mil teq of CO2, whereas those related to gas sold equaled 21.5 mil teq of CO2. Enel regularly monitors these emissions and adopts measures aimed at minimizing them. Fuhermore, Enel oers its customers technical solutions to reduce carbon emissions related to their energy consumption in a wide range of sectors, including transpo, propey management as well as industrial processes and services. For example, with Enel X the Group is promoting the deployment of charging infrastructures for electrical vehicles (186 thousand charging points installed in 20201 , the development of energy eciency solutions, distributed generation, consultancy services, sma public lighting and circular cities.

(1) Installed public and private charging stations. Includes interoperability points, net of which there are 105 thousand charging stations installed at the end of 2020
The Group develops sho-, medium- and long-term scenarios for the energy industry and for macroeconomic and nancial conditions in order to suppo its strategic and industrial planning, the evaluation of investments and extraordinary corporate transactions. The role of climate change in these scenarios is increasingly impoant and produces analyzable eects in terms of:
The issues connected with future trends in climate variables (in terms of acute and chronic phenomena) dene the so-called "physical scenario", while the issues associated with the industrial and economic transition toward solutions to reduce atmospheric concentrations of CO2 are the characteristic elements of the "transition scenario". The scenarios are created within the scope of a complex framework that ensures coherence between climate projections and the transition assumptions, within which to evaluate the phenomena identied in a sho, medium and long-term period.
The adoption of these scenarios and their integration into corporate processes takes account of the guidelines of the TCFD and enables the assessment of the risks and opportunities connected with climate change. For this reason, the Group has created a channel of constant dialog and collaboration with expes on climate change, for example the International Centre for Theoretical Physics (ICTP) of Trieste. Fuhermore, it is structured for managing high-resolution post downscaling climatic scenarios and has staed projects for developing the skills needed to translate the complexity of climate models into information that is useful for understanding the eects, at a local level, on business and suppo strategic decisions.
The acquisition and processing of the large amount of data underlying the scenarios, and the identication of the methodologies and metrics needed for interpreting complex very high-resolution phenomena require a continuous dialog with both external as well as internal references. For this purpose, the Group is using a platform approach, using tools that guarantee solid and accessible information. The process that translates the scenario phenomena into information that is useful for industrial and strategic decisions can be summarized in ve steps:
The Group has selected three of the climatic projections developed by the "Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change" (IPCC) on a global scale, characterized by a specic emissions level connected to the so-called "Representative Concentration Pathway" (RCP) as shown in the following table.
In the RCP 8.5 climate projections, the geographical areas of the Mediterranean and Central/South American will suffer an impact in terms of temperature increase and rainfall

(1) Includes the generation of renewable and nuclear energy.
| SCENARIO | AVERAGE TEMPERATURE INCREASE IN COMPARISON TO PRE-INDUSTRIAL LEVELS (1850-1900) |
|---|---|
| RCP 2.6 | ~ +1.5 °C by 2100 (the IPCC estimates a 78% probability of staying below +2 °C) (1). The Group uses this scenario for the assessment of physical phenomena and for the analyses that consider an energy transition coherent with ambitious objects in terms of mitigation |
| RCP 4.5 | ~ +2.4 °C by 2100. Enel has identied this scenario as the one that is best suited for representing the current global climatic and political context and is coherent with the overall estimates of temperature increase that current policies consider and as announced on a global level (2) |
| RCP 8.5 | ~ +4.3 °C by 2100. Compatible with a worst case scenario where no pa–icular measures are taken to combat climate change |
(1) IPCC Fifth Assessment Repo, Working Group 1, "Long-term Climate Change: Projections, Commitments and Irreversibility". (2) Climate Action Tracker thermometer, global warming estimates for 2100 considering the current "Pledges&Target" (updated as of December 2020).


reduction. These eects will become more pronounced in the second half of the century and the impact increasing up to 2100. In the RCP 2,6 scenario, the eects will be similar but less intense, with the trend slowing in the second half of the century, thereby producing a substantial dierential between the two scenarios in 2100.
The climate scenarios are global in nature. Accordingly, in order to determine the eects in the areas of relevance for the Group, as previously described, a collaborative initiative has been staed with the Eah Sciences depament of the ICTP of Trieste. As pa of this collaboration, the ICTP provides projections for the main climate variables with a grid resolution that varies from approximately 12 km2 to approximately 100 km2 and a forecast horizon of 2030- 2050. The main variables are temperature, rainfall and snowfall and solar radiation. With respect to the analysis carried out in 2019, the current study is no longer based on the use of only one regional climate model (the one from ICTP) but is based on the combination of three models that are selected as representatives of the ensemble of the climate models currently found in literature. This technique is usually used in the scientic community to obtain a more robust analysis that is free of bias, mediated by the various assumptions that could characterize the single model. In this phase of the study conducted in 2020, the future projections were analyzed for Italy, Spain and Brazil obtaining, also due to the use of the ensemble of models, a more denite representation of the physical scenario.
The analyses pe¥ormed on the physical scenarios considered both chronic and acute phenomena. Some of these phenomena require an additional level of complexity, as they do not only depend on climatic trends but also on the specic characteristics of the territory, and require an additional modelling activity for their high-resolution representation. For this reason, in addition to the climate scenarios provided by ICTP, the Group also uses the Natural Hazard map.
This tool provides, with high spatial resolution, the return times for a series of events, such as, for example, storms, hurricanes and oods. The use of this tool, as described in the section "Risks and strategic oppounities related to climate change", is widely consolidated in the Group, which already uses this data based on a historical perspective to optimize the insurance strategies. Fuhermore, work is under way in order to be able to use this information also when processed in compliance with the projections of the climate scenarios.
Acute phenomena: the heat waves were dened in collaboration with the ICTP and Infrastructure and Networks to obtain a description of the climate phenomenon most suitable for characterizing the critical event for business. The identied conditions (at least ve straight days of high temperatures without precipitation) were searched for in the 2030-2050 projections supplied by ICTP, nding an increase in this phenomena both in terms of frequency and geographic distribution in all the analyzed scenarios. In paicular, a considerable worsening of the RCP 8.5 scenario was found, especially on the islands and in the southern areas of the country.
In these scenarios, the intensity of extreme rain and snowfall events increases, but their frequency declines compared with historic trends.
Also the risk of re can be conditioned by climate change. The Group pe¥ormed an analysis using the Fire Weather Index (FWI), which takes factors such as relative humidity, precipitation, wind speed and temperature into account. The days at extreme risk were selected during the 2030-2050 period and compared with those during 1990-2010. In all the analyzed scenarios, there was an increase in days at extreme risk compared to historical values, with dierent intensities on a geographical level. In some regions, the RCP 2.6 scenario shows a slightly higher number of days at extreme risk compared to other scenarios (RCP 4.5 and RCP 8.5), due to factors such as less humidity, which contribute toward the assessment of the re risk.
Chronic phenomena: the average annual temperature is expected to increase over the 2030-2050 period with increases in all the analyzed scenarios. In paicular, for the 2030-2050 period, an average temperature increase, in comparison to the pre-industrial period, of approximately 1.4 °C is expected and within an interval between 1.1 and 2.0 °C for the RCP 8.5 scenario. In the RCP 4.5 scenario, instead, an increase is expected between 1.0 and 1.7 °C with an average value of approximately 1.3 °C, whereas for the RCP 2.6 scenario, the interval is 0.9-1.5 °C with an average value of approximately 1.2 °C. The dierential between the RCP 2.6 scenario and the RCP 4.5 and 8.5 scenarios will increase signicantly during the second half of the century. Chronic changes in temperature can be analyzed to obtain information on the potential eects on cooling and heating demand in local energy systems. As indicators for the measuring of the heating requirements, Heating Degree Days (HDD) were used, which is the sum, extended to all days of the year with Taverage ≤ 15 °C, of the dierences between the indoor temperature (Tindoor assumed as 18 °C) and the average temperature, and the Cooling Degree Days (CDD), which is the sum, extended to all days of the year with Taverage ≥ 24 °C, of the dierences between the Taverage and Tindoor (assumed as 21 °C), respectively for heating and cooling requirements. During the 2030-2050 period(2), there is a 17% reduction in the need for heating compared to 1990-2017, which remains constant in all the scenarios, whereas the CDD always remains higher with respect to historical data, with a growing trend passing from the RCP 2.6 scenario (+55%) to RCP 8.5 (+91%).

It should be pointed out that, with respect to the analysis pe¥ormed in 2019, the RCP 4.5 scenario was introduced, and the ensemble of multiple models was used as the database, as previously described. Fuhermore, to give more impoance to the more populated areas, the HDD and CDD were calculated as an average by country, weighing every geographical node by its population through the use of the Shared Socioeconomic Pathways (SSPs) associated with each scenario.


Cooling Degree Days (CDD) Heating Degree Days
∆ days 25 20 15 10 5 0 RCP 2.6 RCP 4.5 RCP 8.5
AVERAGE NUMBER OF HIGH TEMPERATURE DAYS IN THE VARIOUS RCP SCENARIOS COMPARED WITH HISTORIC
VALUES (1990-2017)
(2) The value of the FWI index considered for identifying the days at extreme risk is based on the analysis of historical data and on references supplied by the European Forest Fire Information System (EEFIS).
Acute phenomena: over the 2030-2050 period, heat waves are expected to increase appreciably in frequency, with their geographical spread expected to expand, especially in the southern area of the country. Extreme rainfall will increase in intensity but its frequency will decline. At the same time, extreme snowfalls will largely remain located in the current geographical areas but their frequency and intensity could decline sharply. As regards the re risk, the number of days at extreme risk is higher in the RCP 8.5 scenario compared to the RCP 2.6 scenario, and always with an increase in comparison to the historical average.
Chronic phenomena: the average annual temperature is expected to increase over the 2030-2050 period with increases in all the considered RCP scenarios. In paicular, for the 2030-2050 period, an average temperature increase, in comparison to the pre-industrial period, of approximately 1.4 °C is expected (in an interval between min +1.2 and max +1.8 °C) for the RCP 8.5 scenario. In the RCP 4.5 scenario, instead, an average increase of approximately 1.2 °C is expected (min 1.0 °C and max 1.5 °C), whereas for the RCP 2.6 scenario, an average increase of approximately 1.0 °C is expected, with an interval between 0.8 °C and 1.3 °C. The dierential between the RCP 2.6 scenario and the RCP 4.5 and 8.5 scenarios will increase signicantly during the second half of the century. In terms of HDD and CDD, for the 2030-2050 period, compared to the 1990-2017 period, we estimate a reduction in HDD (-13%) and an increase in CDD (+41%) in the RCP 2.6 scenario, and a variation in HDD and CDD respectively equal to -17% and +64% in the RCP 8.5 scenario.
2.6 scenario in comparison to the historical average, with greater criticality in the central-west and noh-east areas of the country. As for precipitation, also the re risk will be analyzed in more depth on a local scale based on the needs of the Group. Keep in mind that these considerations are the result of analyses pe¥ormed based only on one climate model and not on an ensemble of multiple models, as was done for Italy and Spain.
Chronic phenomena: the average annual temperature during 2030-2050 is expected to increase with respect to pre-industrial levels in every scenario. In paicular, for the 2030-2050 period, an average temperature increase, in comparison with the 1850-1900, of approximately 1.6 °C is expected (min +1.2, max +2.1 °C) for the RCP 8.5 scenario. The RCP 4.5 scenario instead foresees an average increase of approximately 1.3 °C (min +1.0, max +1.7 °C), whereas the RCP 2.6 scenario foresees nally an average increase of approximately 1.1 °C with an interval between +0.8 and 1.4 °C. In terms of HDD and CDD, during 2030-2050, in comparison to 1990-2017, there is a reduction in HDD (-7%) and an increase in CDD (+13%) in the RCP 2.6 scenario, passing to HDD and CDD values that arrive respectively to -27% and +31% in the RCP 8.5 scenario.
The scenarios used by the Group on a global level are the result of a benchmark analysis of external scenarios and currently known policy objectives. For the main countries where the Group is present, it processes coherent transition scenarios, using energy system models; if internal models are not available, risks and oppounities are evaluated by analyzing scenarios produced by third paies, as described previously.
The main assumptions considered when dening the transition scenarios concern:
Based on the described context, the transition scenario framework the Group used as a basis for the impact analysis regarding the risks and oppounities inherent to climate change considers two scenarios: one "ineial" (Reference), established mainly based on current or announced policies as well as specic internal assumptions regarding the evolution of individual variables of interest, and a more ambitious one (Brighter Future), in line with reaching the Paris goals, which presupposes stricter objectives in terms of reductions in carbon dioxide emissions and increases in energy eciency, as well as the possible acceleration in the reduction in cost of some technologies. This second case involves an incremental growth in electric generation from renewable sources and a greater demand in electricity due to the increased electrication of nal consumption, guided mainly by more ambitious objectives in terms of energy eciency and decarbonization.
If the countries with greatest emissions do not adopt effective decarbonization policies, instead pursuing policies
Acute phenomena: the trend of acute phenomena in countries very large such as Brazil, can show signicantly dierent trends in the various areas. Our analyses focus on the areas of interest for the Group. For example, the rst studies carried out for the State of São Paolo show an increase in heat waves. In Brazil, the climate projections estimate a larger average reduction in precipitations in the noh, with extreme phenomena to be analyzed on a local scale. From the rst analyses, the number of days with an extreme re risk seems to be projected with an increase both in the RCP 8.5 scenario and with respect to the RCP
The transition scenario refers to the description of how the generation and consumption of energy evolves in various sector in an economic, social and regulatory context consistent with dierent trends in greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and, therefore, correlated with the RCP climate scenarios.


AVERAGE NUMBER OF EXTREME RISK DAYS: DIFFERENCES BETWEEN RCP SCENARIOS AND HISTORICAL VALUES


that produce no change or actually worsen conditions, any paicularly ambitious transition trajectories dened on a local level could co-exist with worsening climate change scenarios with respect to the Paris goals. In fact, the ambitions of individual countries regarding mitigation actions are not sucient on their own to determine long-term trajectories of emissions and the resulting RCP pathways.
To process the transition scenarios related to the countries included in the analysis, the Group has equipped itself with quantitative tools that incorporate assumptions regarding the evolution of policies, technologies and other context variables to produce corresponding projections for energy demand, electricity demand, electricity generation, the penetration of renewables and electric vehicles, etc. In sho, all the variables that characterize a national energy system relevant to the Group's activities.
Once the medium-long term transition scenarios have been determined, the adopted scenario framework will make it possible to analyze the longer-term chronic physical eects determined on a local level by the considered climatic pathways. An example is the analysis of the impact the change in temperature has on electric demand. For this purpose, the two scenarios Reference and Brighter Future for Italy and Spain, as previously described, were integrated with the HDD and CDD of RCP 4.5 and RCP 2.6 respectively. This made it possible to quantify the eect that temperature change has on energy demand (total, not just electric) for cooling and heating in residential and commercial sectors. The time period on which the analysis concentrates refers to the period from 2030 to 2050, during which the current European Union policy regarding the goal of carbon neutrality, in both scenarios Reference and Brighter Future, converge in 2050 toward decarbonized and electried energy systems.
Through the use of integrated energy system models, it is possible to quantify the individual service demands for a country. This level of detail makes it possible to distinguish the specic eects that temperature change can have on energy requirements. Considering the entire time period that was analyzed, the scenario of reaching carbon neutrality faster provided by Brighter Future is more ecient and electried in comparison to Reference. This dierence in the speed of transition involves an average increase in electric demand in the Brighter Future scenario as compared to Reference during 2030-2050 of between 3% and 4%. When also considering the eect of temperature and analyzing the dierences between the two scenarios associated with the two dierent RCP 4.5 and 2.6, there is an average increase in electric demand of less than 1% both for the Reference scenario and for Brighter Future. In the later years, this impact can reach 2%. Considering the coherent view, the potential eect of more ambitious transition scenarios has a more signicant impact on electric demand than the increase in temperature resulting from climate change.
With the purpose of fuher analyzing what eect temperature has on the transition scenarios, and at the same time expand the range of assumptions concerning climate change, a sensitivity analysis was pe¥ormed associating the Reference scenario with RCP 8.5, as well as RCP 4.5. Assuming such an additional increase in temperature, with the same energy transition, leads to an increase of less than 1% in demand in the Reference RCP 8.5 with respect to the one with RCP 4.5.
If on the one hand the trends regarding day degrees are similar, the substantial dierence between Italy and Spain concerns the energy system at 2030. For the la©er, in fact, the Reference scenario is very similar to Brighter Future, in line with the national energy plan that already appears very challenging. As a result, the eect of the temperature between RCP 2.6 and 4.5 remains, as for Italy, less than 1% and in the same direction, and the eect relative to transition remains negligible3.
If for Italy and Spain the role of temperature is contained, Brazil, which is another country of paicular interest for the Group, could have a more considerable increase in demand due to the increase in temperature, equal to a few percentage points of total demand. This is caused by the greater demand for cooling expected in the country. These estimates are in any case subject to a considerable degree of unceainty, given the signicant volatility of Brazil's economic growth.
The sustainable strategy developed in recent years and the integrated business model have allowed the Group to create value for all stakeholders, beneting from the opportunities that emerge from the energy transition and from climate action. Capital employment is in fact centered on decarbonization, through the development of generation assets from renewable sources, in enabling infrastructure linked to the development of networks, and on the adoption of platform models, fully exploiting technological and digital evolution, which will favor consumption electrication and the development of new services for end customers. The aim is to accelerate the decarbonization and electrication processes to allow the global warming containment goals to be achieved in accordance with the Paris Agreement.
In this context, it becomes fundamentally impoant to extend the strategic vision to the medium-long term. Guided by this need, in November 2020 Enel presented the new Strategic Plan with a vision that arrives up to 2030, with its strategy focusing on the acceleration of the energy transition together with sustainable and remunerative growth to create a signicant share value for customers, society and the environment, in addition to an interesting prot for shareholders over time.
Thanks to platform-based models, during this decade utilities will reinforce their guiding role at the veex of increasingly complex systems, which will include a growing number of distributed generation assets, with an increasingly active role of end customers. A digital platform-based and multi-layer model that connects data and solutions will be of fundamental impoance for going through and successfully completing this transformation phase.
As a "platform-based" operator, the Group will be able to take advantage of new oppounities to create value using two complementary business models:

know-how, by means of platforms that mobilize investments by third paies to maximize the creation of value. In this way, the Group intends to mobilize 190 billion euros in investments during 2021-2030, promoting decarbonization, the electrication of consumption and the development of platforms for creating shared and sustainable value for all stakeholders and medium- and long-term protability. The Group intends to directly invest approximately 160 billion euros, of which more than 150 billion euros by means of the Ownership business model and approximately 10 billion euros through the Stewardship model, mobilizing at the same time an additional 30 billion euros from third paies.
Within the scope of energy generation, the increase in renewable capacity with the simultaneous reduction in thermal capacity, which includes the early closure of the coal red plants by 2027, represent the two main strategic levers that the Group intends to use to reach the decarbonization of its generation mix.
The investments planned for the energy generation activity in the Ownership business model for 2021-2030 include a
(3) It should be pointed out how the considerable electrication of the heating service in the residential sector in future years could change the direction and the order of magnitude of the eect related to climate change, both for Italy and for Spain.

total of approximately 65 billion euros for renewable energies, which will make it possible for the Group to add an additional 75 GW of renewable capacity, which will be well balanced between solar and wind, to the actual consolidated 45 GW, for a total of approximately 120 GW of installed capacity in 2030 (2.7 times greater than current levels). The investments mainly concern countries with the integrated presence of the Group, but the various Countries and Regions involved will permit a natural derisking with respect to the volatility of renewable resources. In order to achieve this result, the Group will use the largest pipeline of renewable projects worldwide, around 206 GW at December 2020, together with a global platform-based model for Business Development, Engineering and Construction and Operation and Maintenance activities. Fuhermore, Enel is planning to invest an additional 5 billion euros in hybridization of renewable sources and storage stems, whose potential will reach approximately 20 TWh in 2030. Signicant oppounities will also arrive from the segment of green hydrogen, for which Enel intends to integrate the electrolyzer in renewable plants that produce electricity for direct sale or for dispatching services, selling green hydrogen also to industrial customers. The Group plans to increase its green hydrogen capacity to more than 2 GW by 2030.
Fuhermore, the distribution grid plays a central role in the energy transition process as an enabler in the transformation of the electricity market toward renewable sources. Therefore, it is estimated that approximately 46% of the investments as of 2030 regarding the Ownership business model will be dedicated to the Infrastructure and Networks business, with the goal of obtaining improvements in terms of service quality and grid resilience, of increasing the number of connections and improving the level of infrastructure digitalization. Thanks to these initiatives, Enel expects to expand the number of nal users to more than 90 million, all of which will have sma meters, from the current 74 million, of which 60% have sma meters.
The remaining pa of investments concerning the Ownership business model, approximately 5%, will be dedicated to customers. The Group will have an enabling role in the electrication process by accelerating the customer's path toward sustainability and energy eciency, combining a traditional oer with "beyond commodity" services. These activities will benet from the largest customer base on a global level, from digital platforms and a growing integrated pofolio of oers. The Group's strategy will include all segments: B2C (Business to Customer), B2B (Business to Business) and B2G (Business to Government). As regards the Stewardship business model, during 2021- 2030 Enel expects to directly invest 10 billion euros, while mobilizing at the same time approximately 30 billion euros from third paies, for a total investment of approximately 40 billion euros, mainly in renewable energies, in ber, in electric mobility and in exibility services.
During 2021-2023, Enel plans to directly invest approximately 40 billion euros, of which 38 billion euros through the Ownership business model, mainly in the growth of grids and renewables, and approximately 2 billion euros in the Stewardship model, while mobilizing at the same time 8 billion euros from third paies.
With reference to the business of renewable energies, both business models will allow Enel to construct approximately 19.5 GW of new renewable capacity during the three years of the plan:
Ordinary EBITDA connected to energy generation is expected to reach approximately 7.7 billion euros in 2023, an increase of 11.6% compared to 7.0 billion euros in 2020. This growth will be driven by the business of renewables, whose ordinary EBITDA is expected around 6.5 billion euros in 2023 (+1.8 billion euros compared to approximately 4.7 billion euros in 2020), but with a drop in ordinary EBITDA for thermal generation to approximately 1.2 billion euros in 2023, from approximately 2.2 billion euros in 2020.
In the Infrastructure and Networks business, Enel expects to invest 16.2 billion euros in the three-year period, increasing the average annual investment to approximately 5.4 billion euros. 65% of this amount will be used for improving service quality and grid resilience, approximately 23% for new connections and approximately 12% for digitalization. The ordinary EBITDA of Infrastructure and Networks is expected to be approximately 9.5 billion euros at the end of 2023, with an increase of 23.4% as compared to approximately 7.7 billion euros in 2020.
The remaining amount is associated with the Customer business, where the value of residential customers (B2C) is expected to increase approximately 30% in comparison to an increase of approximately 45% for business customers (B2B) as a result of the expansion in the free market customer pofolio and the electrication trends of energy consumption that promote demand for "beyond commodity" services. Finally, in the B2G segment, the Group expects to continue suppoing the progress cities are marking toward


electric mobility, by adding approximately 200 thousand public charging stations in 2021-2023 and contributing, with direct and indirect investments, to put approximately 5.500 electric buses into service (a 6-fold increase in comparison to 2020).
At the end of the period of the plan, Enel X aims to reach approximately 780 thousand public and private charging points made available on a global level, from 186 thousand in 20204 (+6 times), approximately 10.6 GW of demand response capacity from the 6 GW oered in 2020 (+1.8 times), in addition to the 500 MW of stored capacity, from 123 MW in 2020.
The ordinary EBITDA associated with the customer business is expected to reach 4.5 billion euros at the end of 2023, compared with 3.4 billion euros in 2020, with a contribution of approximately 500 million euros of B2C, approximately 400 million euros of B2B, and approximately 100 million euros of B2G.
The investments connected to the decarbonization of the generation mix, together with those connected to digitalization and increasing the eciency of the distribution grid, as well as the oer of new services for promoting the electri cation of consumption (such as electric mobility services or demand response), will contribute toward the ght against climate change (SDG 13). Enel expects in fact that approximately 90% of the consolidated investments during 2021- 2023 will directly contribute toward this goal. Fuhermore, it is estimated that these investments will be aligned with the criteria of European taxonomy, with a percentage between 80% and 90%, considering the substantial contribution toward the mitigation of climate change.
102-15 103-2 103-3 201-2
The process of dening the Group's strategy is accompanied by a careful analysis of the risks and oppounities connected to it, also including the aspects related to climate change. Every year, before the Board of Directors ex-
Renewables (including capacity and managed generation)
(coal, CCGT, oil/gas, nuclear)

(4) Installed public and private charging stations. Includes interoperability points, net of which there are 105 thousand charging stations installed at the end of 2020
amines the Strategic Plan, the Control and Risk Commi©ee is presented with a quantitative analysis of the risks and
oppounities related to the Group's strategic positioning, which includes aspects related to the climate, such as regulatory factors and weather-climatic events.
In order to identify the main types of risk and oppounity and their impact on the business associated with them in a structured manner consistent with the TCFD, we have adopted a specic framework that explicitly represents the main relationships between scenario variables and types of risk and oppounity, specifying the strategic and operational approaches to managing them, comprising mitigation and adaptation measures. Two main macro-categories of risks/ oppounities are identied:
The framework makes it possible to analyze and evaluate the impact of the physical and transition phenomena according to solid, alternative scenarios that were created using a quantitative and model-based approach in combination with continuous dialog both with internal stakeholders and with authoritative external references.
The framework also highlights the relationships that link the
physical and transition scenarios with the potential impact on the Group's business. These eects can be assessed from the perspective of three time horizons: sho-medium term (1-3 years), in which sensitivity analyses based on the Strategic Plan presented to investors in 2020 can be pe¥ormed; medium term (until 2029), in which it is possible to assess the eects of the energy transition; and long term (2030-2050), in which chronic structural changes in the climate can potentially begin to emerge.
The main impacts of chronic physical changes can produce
similar eects on the following variables:
As regards the eects of chronic physical changes, the Group will work to estimate the relationships between changes in physical variables and the change in the potential output of individual plants in the dierent categories of generation technology.
Scenario analysis has shown that chronic structural changes in the trends of physical variables will begin to occur in a considerable manner staing from 2030. How-
| Scenario phenomena |
Time horizon |
Risk & oppo"unity category |
Description | Impact | Management approach |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Acute physical |
Sta–ing with sho– term (1-3 years) |
Extreme events |
Risk: especially extreme weather/climate events. |
Extreme events can damage assets and interrupt operations. |
The Group adopts best practices to manage the restoration of service as quickly as possible. We also work to implement investments in resilience (Italy case). With regard to risk assessment in insurance, the Group has a loss prevention program for prope–y risk that also assesses the main exposures to natural events. Looking forward, the assessments will also include the potential impacts of long-term trends in the most signicant climate variables. |
| Chronic physical |
Sta–ing with long term (2030-2050) |
Market | Risk/oppo"unity: increase or decrease in electricity demand; increase or decrease in output. |
Electricity demand is also a˜ected by temperature, whose •uctuation can impact our business. |
The Group's geographical and technological diversiŽcation means that the impact of changes (positive and negative) in a single variable is mitigated at the global level. In order to ensure that operations always take account of weather and climate phenomena, the Group adopts a range of practices such as, for example, weather forecasting, real-time monitoring of plants and long-term climate scenarios. |
| Transition | Sta–ing with medium term (2024-2029) |
Policy & Regulation |
Risk/oppo"unity: policies on CO2 prices and emissions, energy transition incentives, greater scope for investment in renewables and resilience regulation. |
Policies concerning the energy transition and resilience can impact the volume of and returns on investments. |
The Group is minimizing its exposure to risks through the progressive decarbonization of its generation •eet. The Group's strategic actions, which are focused on investment in renewables, networks and customers, enable us to mitigate potential threats and exploit the oppo–unities connected with the energy transition. The Group is also actively contributing to the formation of public policies through its advocacy e˜o–s. These activities are conducted within platforms for dialogue with stakeholders called "Energy Transition Roadmaps" that explore national decarbonization scenarios in the various countries in which Enel operates in environmental, economic and social terms. |
Risk &
| Scenario phenomena |
Time horizon |
oppo"unity | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Transition | Sta–ing with medium term (2024-2029) |
Market | Risk/oppo"unity: changes in the prices of commodities and energy, evolution of energy mix, changes in retail consumption, changes in competitive environment. |
Considering two alternative transition scenarios, the Group assesses the impact of trends in the propo–ion of renewable sources in the energy mix, penetration of EVs to impacts. |
| Transition | Sta–ing with medium term (2024-2029) |
Product & Services |
Oppo"unity: increase in margins and greater scope for investment as a consequence of the transition in terms of greater penetration of new electrical technologies for residential |
Trends in the electrication of transpo–ation and residential consumption will potentially have an impact on our business. |
| Sta–ing with medium term (2024-2029) |
Technology | consumption and electric transpo"ation. |
Considering two alternative transition |

ever, in order to obtain an indicative estimate of the potential impacts, it is possible to test sensitivity of the Industrial Plan to the factors potentially inuenced by the physical scenario, regardless of any direct relationship with climate variables. Of course, such stress testing has an extremely low probability of occurrence based on historical events and geographical diversication. The variables examined are: electricity demand (+/-1% per year), whose variations can potentially impact the generation and retail businesses. It was stress tested for all countries in which the Group operates. The output potential of renewables plants was also stressed (+/-10% over a single year). Variations in this variable can potentially impact the generation business. It was stressed separately at the individual technology level around the globe. The data repoed show the eect on a single year for a single generation technology and include both the volume and price eects.
With regard to acute physical phenomena (extreme events), their intensity and frequency can cause signicant and unexpected physical damage to assets and generate negative externalities associated with the interruption of service.
Within the scope of scenarios regarding climate change, the acute physical component continues playing an extremely impoant role when dening the risks to which the Group is exposed, both due to the wide geographical diversication of its asset pofolio and due to the primary impoance of the renewable natural resources for the generation of electricity.
In the various cases, the acute physical phenomena such as wind storms, oods, heat waves, severe cold, etc. demonstrate a high level of intensity yet do not have a very high occurrence frequency in the sho term, but, considering the medium and long-term climatic scenarios, this will increase considerably in the future.
For the reasons described above, the Group is currently managing the risk deriving from extreme events in the sho term. At the same time, it is extending its methodology also to longer time periods (until 2050) according to the identied climate change scenarios (RCP 8.5, 4.5 and 2.6).
In order to quantify the risk deriving from extreme events, the Group refers to a consolidated methodology for analyzing the catastrophic risk used in the insurance sector and in IPCC repos. Through its own insurance business units and the captive insurance company Enel Insurance NV, the Group is managing the various phases connected to risks deriving from natural catastrophes: from the assessment and quantication to the corresponding coverages to minimize the impacts. The methodology applies to all extreme events that can be analyzed, such as wind storms, heat waves, tropical cyclones, oods, etc. In all of these types of natural catastrophes, however, three independent factors can be identied that are summarized below.
so-called "return time". A catastrophic event that has a return time of 250 years, for example, implies that it can be associated with a probability of 0.4% that it will occur in a year. This information, which is necessary for assessing the frequency of the event, is then associated with its geographical distribution with respect to the various areas where pofolio assets are located. For this purpose, the Group uses hazard maps, which associate, for the various types of natural catastrophes, each geographical point on the global map with the corresponding estimate of the frequency associated with the extreme event. This information, which is organized in geo-referenced databases, can be provided by global reinsurance companies, meteorological consultancy companies or academic institutions.
› The vulnerability, that, in percentage terms, indicates how much value is lost and/or damaged upon occurrence of the catastrophic event. In more specic terms, therefore, it is possible to refer to the damage to the material assets the impact on the continuity of generation and/or distribution of electricity, and also the provision of the electric services oered to the end customer.
› The probability of the event (hazard), that is its theoretical frequency over a specic period of time, the been dened. Downside scenario

The Group creates and promotes specic vulnerability analyses, especially in the case of damage to its assets, related to every technology in its pofolio: solar, wind, hydroelectric power plants, transmission and distribution grids, primary and secondary substations, etc. These analyses are then, of course, focused on the extreme events that have greater impact on the various types of technology: as a result, this denes a matrix that associates the individual natural catastrophic events with the corresponding type of asset that is impacted in a considerable manner.
› The exposure, which represents the set of economic values in the Group pofolio that can be considerably impacted by the occurrence of natural catastrophic events. Also in this case, the scopes of the analyses are specic to the various generation technologies, for the generation assets and for the services to the end customer.
The combination of the three factors described above – hazard, vulnerability and exposure – provides the fundamental element for assessing the risk deriving from extreme events. From this point of view, the Group dierentiates the risk analysis with respect to the climate change scenarios, depending on the specic nature of the various associated time periods. In the case of the vulnerability of assets in the pofolio, the priorities of the impact othe various extreme events have on the various technologies have

Over the sho term (1-3 years) the Group, in addition to what was illustrated above in terms of risk assessment and qualication, will implement actions targeted toward reducing the impacts on business due to extreme catastrophic events. It is possible to distinguish two main types of actions: dening an eective insurance coverage and the various activities related to preventing damage that could result from extreme events.
The main components of these actions are described below and, in the case of activities related to preventing and mitigating the damage, specic reference is made to the Group's Generation and Infrastructure and Networks Global Business Lines.
Every year, the Group denes global insurance programs for its business in the various countries where it operates. The two main programs, in terms of scope of coverage and volumes, are as follows:
assets and on the Group's business.
Staing from an eective assessment of the risk, suitable limits and insurance conditions can be dened in the insurance policies and this also applies in the case of natural extreme events related to climate change. In fact, in this la©er case, the impacts on business can be considerable but, as shown in cases that occurred in the past and in various areas around the world, the Group has shown absolute resilience thanks to the wide insurance coverage limits, which are also the result of a solid reinsurance structure, as regards the Group's captive company Enel Insurance NV.
The Group pe¥orms various control activities to manage the impact of weather events on electricity generation, such as:
Fuhermore, the Group has pe¥ormed work for improving the physical resilience of its electric generation plants, including:

Group has prepared specic policies and actions targeted toward facing the various aspects and various risks inherent to climate change within the scope of the infrastructures and the electricity grid. In paicular:

ty grid: their objective is to identify the extraordinary climatic events that will have the greatest impact on the grid. This makes it possible to select the actions that, when implemented, minimize the impact on the grid of paicularly critical extreme events in a ceain area/region. In Italy, this policy is reected in the Resilience Plan that e-distribuzione has prepared every year since 2017, and which represents an addendum to the Development Plan that includes ad hoc investments over a 3 year period that aim to reduce the impact of extreme events belonging to a ceain critical cluster: heat waves, ice loads and wind storms (falling of tall trees). During 2017-2019, approximately 400 million euros were invested and a similar amount will also be used in the following three-year period (approximately 130 million euros per year), concerning approximately 3 million customers and up to 4,000 km of medium voltage lines. Also in other countries, both in Europe and in South America, similar topics are being analyzed to be able to prepare a process for the planning of ad hoc investments;
During 2020, the phenomena of heat waves was fuher analyzed. In light of the climatic scenarios prepared ad hoc to assess the extreme event-cost historical correlation, using a paicularly critical year as the reference year (2017, selected both due to the intensity of the phenomenon and for its extension through the entire national territory), an initial estimate was obtained of the possible costs associated with an increase in the heat waves during 2030- 2050. These estimates of the potential future extra annual cost were evaluated in the three RCP scenarios (for 2030-2050), demonstrating how in a RCP 2.6 scenario they do not represent more than 3% of the annual value of the work planned in the current 2020-2022 Resilience Plan described above, just as they do not exceed 5% in the RCP 8.5 scenario.
As regards the risks and oppounities associated with transition variables, we consider the dierent reference scenarios in combination with the elements that make up the risk identication process (e.g. competitive context, long-term vision of the industry, materiality analysis, technological evolution, etc.) to identify the drivers of potential risks and oppounities, with priority on events with greater relevancy. The main identied risks and oppounities are illustrated below:
› Limits on emissions and carbon pricing: the enactment of laws and regulations that introduce more stringent emissions limits by government action (non-market driven) and market-based mechanisms, such as a carbon tax in non-ETS (Emissions Trading System) sectors or an expansion of the ETS in other sectors.
carbonization and the upgrading/digitalization of enabling infrastructure.

for renewables and all sources of exibility.
– Risks: exposure of "merchant" technologies to the volatility of market prices.
Unlike chronic climate impacts, developments in the transition scenario could have impacts in the sho and medium-long term (by 2030) as well.
To instead quantify the risks and oppounities deriving from the energy transition in the long term, two transition scenarios, described in the "Transition scenario" paragraph have been considered for Italy and Spain. The eects on the variables most relevant for business have been identied, in paicular in the Brighter Future scenarios, that is the electricity demand (driven by increased electrication of consumption) and the generation energy mix. These considerations oer a basis for determining the Group's strategic positioning in terms of resource allocation. A greater ambition in terms of decarbonization and energy eciency involves the dynamics related to energy transition that can provide greater oppounities for the Group. In paicular, in the retail electricity market, the progressive electrication of nal consumption – especially for trans-
Over recent years, in order to deal with extreme climatic events, the Enel Group has adopted an approach called "4R" which uses a specic policy to dene the measures to adopt, both when preparing for an emergency on the grid, and to quickly restore service ex post, that is when the climatic events cause damage to the assets and/or disconnections. The 4R strategy is divided into four phases:
| Risk & | Time horizon(1) |
Description and impact |
Quantifica | Quantification - range | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| opportunity category |
GBL affected |
Scope | tion - Type of impact |
<100 €mil |
100- 300 €mil |
>300 €mil |
||
| Market | Medium term |
Opportunity: Increase in margins due to impact of transition on electrification of energy consumption. Risk: Increase in competition and possible decrease in market share. Considering two alternative transition scenarios, the Group assesses the impact of trends in efficiency, the adoption of electric devices and the penetration of EVs to estimate its potential effect on electricity demand, including the effect on gas customers associated with the increase in electrification. |
End-user Markets |
Italy and Iberia |
EBITDA 2030 Brighter vs Reference |
|||
| Product & Services |
Medium term |
Opportunity: Increase in margins and greater scope for investment due to impact of transition in terms of penetration of new technologies and electric transportation. Considering two alternative transition scenarios, the Group has assessed the impact of trends in the electrification of transportation and residential consumption to assess the potential effects. |
Enel X | Italy and Iberia |
EBITDA 2030 Brighter vs Reference |
po and the residential sector – will lead to a considerable increase in electrical consumption to the detriment of other energy vectors.
In reference to the economic impacts that may result from the change in the transition scenarios, the Group has performed some analyses regarding impacts in terms of EBIT-DA that the Brighter Future scenario would have on 2030 results compared to the Reference scenario.
Considering the level of ambition dened in the national plan, the two scenarios in Iberia do not foresee substantial increases in the penetration of renewable energies, and therefore no considerable impacts are estimated resulting from variations in the price of energy.
In Italy, on the other hand, the Brighter Future scenario enables greater penetration of renewable energies, with additional eects on installed capacity, which is paially balanced by a possible reduction in energy prices. Similar eects are highly probably in other Countries and Regions, such as in Noh America.
In reference to the electrication of consumption, instead, the Brighter Future scenario shows higher penetration rates for the most ecient electrical technologies. In particular, the considerable increase in electrical vehicles and heating/cooling systems that use heat pumps will cause a 5% increase in demand as compared to the Reference scenario, which is estimated to determine positive impacts both on the retail business and on the services oered by Enel X. The greater penetration of heat pumps could also generate a reduction in the sales of gas in the retail area, due to the gradual transition toward the electric carrier; the overall eect is however estimated as being positive from the point of view of EBITDA results, together with a reduction in CO2 emissions connected to the Scope 3 SBTi goals. The Brighter Future scenario, as previously seen, will involve a considerable increase in complexities that must be managed by the grids in various countries and regions.
A signicant increase is expected in fact in distributed generation and in other resources, such as storage systems, greater penetration of electric mobility with the relative charging infrastructures, as well as the increasing rate of electrication of consumption and the introduction of new actors with new methods of consumption. This context will involve a decentralization of the extraction/feed-in points, an increase in electric demand and the average requested power, a considerable variation in energy ows, which will require dynamic and exible grid management. The Group therefore expects that in this scenario incremental investments will be necessary to guarantee the connections and suitable levels of quality and resilience, by promoting the adoption of innovative operating models. These investments must be accompanied by coherent policy and regulation scenarios to guarantee suitable economic returns for the Infrastructure and Networks Business Line.
103-2 103-3 305-1 305-2 305-3 305-4
In 2020, Enel's carbon footprint was equal to 98.0 MtCO2eq (26% lower than 2019), mainly due to the reduced generation of electricity from fossil fuels, divided as follows:

technical grid losses in the distribution grid;
› Scope 3: 47.7 MtCO2eq (16% decrease compared to 2019) which represents 49% of total GHG emissions. The use of sold assets (electricity and gas retail market) represented 98% of the footprint of these emissions.
The GHG inventory statements were audited by DNV GL, one of the main ceication bodies world-wide, with a reasonable level of ceainty for Scope 1, Scope 2 and Scope 3 emissions, as limited to the sale of natural gas, and with a limited level of ceainty for the other Scope 3 emissions included within the scope of application of the inventory. The audit was conducted according to Standard ISO 4064-3 for the compliance of greenhouse gas (GHG) inventories with the WBCSD/WRI Corporate Accounting and Repoing Standard (GHG Protocol).
For more details concerning Enel's carbon footprint, refer to the 2020 GHG inventory (accessible in the web site in the Sustainability section)
| Risk & opportunity category |
Time horizon(1) |
Description and impact |
GBL affected |
Scope | Quantifica | Quantification - range | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| tion - Type of impact |
<100 € mil |
100- 300 € mil |
>300 € mil |
||||||
| Policy & Regulation |
Short/ medium term |
Risk: Impact on margin due to measures affecting CO2 price. Considering the potential impact of |
Global Power Generation |
Italy and Iberia |
EBITDA/year | +10% | |||
| regulatory measures to incentivize energy transition, the Group assesses the exposure to changes of +/- 10% in the price of CO2 using sensitivity analysis. |
-10% | ||||||||
| Global Power Generation |
Medium term |
Opportunity: Greater room for investment in new renewables capacity. Risk: Decrease in power prices due to increased penetration of renewables. Considering the two alternative transition scenarios, the Group assessed the impact of an increase in the penetration of renewables on the benchmark power price and on additional capacity at 2030. |
Global Power Generation |
Italy and Iberia |
EDITDA 2030/ Brighter vs Reference |
| Source | Description | |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Generation from thermal sources |
Combustion of fossil fuels in generation activities (CCGT, oil & gas and coal thermal plants). Including: > CO2 emissions (44.67 and 69.39 Mt in 2020 and 2019 respectively) > CH4 emissions (GWP = 28), expressed in CO2eq (0.02 and 0.04 MtCO2eq in 2020 and 2019 respectively) > N2 O emissions (GWP = 265), expressed in CO2eq (0.09 and 0.24 MtCO2eq in 2020 and 2019 respectively) |
| 2 | Other | > Fossil fuel combustion in auxiliary motors of nuclear and renewable plants (0.08 and 0.01 MtCO2eq in 2020 and 2019 respectively) > NF3 losses (GWP = 16,100), expressed in CO2eq (0.01 and 0.01 ktCO2eq in 2020 and 2019 respectively) for solar panel generation > SF6 losses (GWP = 23,500), expressed in CO2eq (0.02 and 0.03 MtCO2eq in 2020 and 2019 respectively) for energy generation > Use of refrigerant gases in thermal and hydroelectric plants (0.01 MtCO2eq in 2020 and marginal in 2019) |
| 3 | SF6 losses | SF6 losses (GWP= 23,500), expressed in CO2eq (0.13 and 0.16 MtCO2eq in 2020 and 2019 respectively) for energy distribution |
| 4 | Auxiliary motors |
Combustion of fossil fuels in auxiliary motors as pa› of energy distribution activities (0.02 and 0.01 MtCO2eq in 2020 and 2019 respectively) |
| 5 | Offices | Diesel and methane combustion for heating and canteens in oœces, and use of refrigerant gases, including all prope›ies of all Business Lines (Generation, Infrastructure & Networks, Market and Enel X) and Group oœces (0.07 and 0.02 MtCO2eq in 2020 and 2019 respectively) |
| 6 | Company fleet Diesel and gasoline combustion in company ¢eet vehicles (0.14 and 0.09 MtCO2eq in 2020 and 2019 respectively) | |
| 7 | Electricity purchased from the grid |
Consumption of electricity purchased from the grid for energy generation in thermal power plants and for pumping in hydroelectric plants (1.47 and 1.32 MtCO2eq in 2020 and 2019 respectively). The £gures shown are calculated using the location-based approach, while the market-based approach gives a £gure of 2.26 and 1.99 MtCO2eq for 2020 and 2019 respectively |
| 8 | Technical losses from the grid |
> Energy dissipation due to transmission network losses (not owned) for the share of energy sold to the end customer (0.39 and 0.46 MtCO2eq in 2020 and 2019 respectively). The £gures shown are calculated using the location-based approach, while the market-based approach produces a £gure of 0.58 and 0.71 for 2020 and 2019 respectively > Energy dissipation due to distribution network losses under Enel's operational control (3.17 and 3.36 MtCO2eq in 2020 and 2019 respectively). The £gures shown are calculated using the location-based approach, while the market-based approach produces a £gure of 4.99 and 5.29 for 2020 and 2019 respectively |
| 9 | Electricity purchased from the grid |
Consumption of electricity purchased from the grid for distribution activities in substations (0.15 MtCO2eq in both 2020 and 2019). The £gures shown are calculated using the location based approach, while the market based approach gives a £gure of 0.24 MtCO2eq for both 2020 and 2019 |
| 10 | Electricity purchased from the grid |
Consumption of electricity purchased from the grid for civilian use (technological devices, lighting, heating) in the sites and commercial oœces (Mercato and Enel X) (0.06 and 0.08 MtCO2eq in 2020 and 2019 respectively). The £gures shown are calculated using the location-based approach, while the market-based approach produces a £gure of 0.05 and 0.07 for 2020 and 2019 respectively |
| 11 | Coal (upstream) |
Including: > GHG Protocol Scope 3, category 3 (fuel and energy activities not included in Scope 1 and 2): fugitive emissions from coal mining used in coal-£red power plants (1.06 and 3.30 MtCO2eq in 2020 and 2019 respectively) > GHG Protocol Scope 3, category 4 (transpo› and distribution upstream of power generation): transpo›ation of coal by ship/air (0.05 and 0.45 MtCO2eq in 2020 and 2019 respectively) and by rail (0.21 MtCO2eq in 2019 only) |
| 12 | Diesel & fuel oil (upstream) |
GHG Protocol Scope 3, category 4 (transpo› and distribution upstream of energy generation): transpo›ation of diesel and fuel oil on wheels (0.011 and 0.01 MtCO2eq in 2020 and 2019 respectively) |
| 13 | Transportation of other raw materials and waste (upstream) |
GHG Protocol Scope 3, category 4 (transpo› and distribution upstream of energy generation): transpo›ation of other raw materials and waste on wheels linked to thermal and renewable generation (0.01 and 0.01 MtCO2eq in 2020 and 2019 respectively) |
| 14 | Sale of electricity |
GHG Protocol Scope 3, category 11 (use of goods sold): emissions from the use of electricity sold to end customers (retail market) (25.04 and 28.98 MtCO2eq in 2020 and 2019 respectively) |
| 15 | Sale of gas | GHG Protocol Scope 3, category 11 (use of goods sold): emissions from the use of gas sold to end customers (retail market) (21.48 and 23.92 MtCO2eq in 2020 and 2019 respectively) |

| VALUE CHAIN |
Electricity generation |
Electricity distribution |
End customer |
Other | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GLOBAL BUSINESS LINE |
Real | Estate | ||||||
| GHG SCOPE 1 direct emissions (MtCO2eq) |
1 Thermal generation |
2 Other |
3 SF6 losses |
4 Auxiliary motors |
Including in source "5" |
5 Sites and oŒces |
6 Company •eet |
|
| 69.67 44.79 |
0.04 0.11 | 0.16 0.13 | 0.01 0.02 |
0.02 0.07 | 0.09 0.14 |
|||
| GHG SCOPE 2 indirect emissions (MtCO2eq) |
7 Electricity purchase |
8 Technical losses from the grid |
9 Electricity purchase |
Including in source "10" |
10 Electricity purchase |
|||
| (location based) |
1.55 1.43 | 3.82 3.56 | 0.15 0.15 | 0.08 0.06 |
||||
| GHG SCOPE 3 indirect emissions (MtCO2eq) |
11 Coal (upstream) 4.00 1.16 13 |
12 Diesel & fuel oil (upstream) 0.01 0.01 |
- | 14 Sale of electricity 28.98 25.04 15 |
- | |||
| Transpo–a tion of other raw materials and waste (upstream) |
0.01 0.01 | Sale of natural gas |
23.92 21.48 |
|||||
| TOTAL DIRECT EMISSIONS GHG SCOPE 1 (MtCO2eq) |
TOTAL INDIRECT EMISSIONS GHG SCOPE 2 (MtCO2eq) (location based)1 |
TOTAL INDIRECT EMISSIONS GHG SCOPE 3 (MtCO2eq) |
TOTAL EMISSIONS GHG (MtCO2eq) 132.3 |
|||||
| 70.0 45.3 (1) Market based: 2019 = 8.3; 2020 = 7.85. |
5.4 5.0 |
56.9 | 47.7 | 97.9 |
| 1 | ||
|---|---|---|
The roadmap and the
targets for the reduc-
tion of greenhouse gas
In 2020, Enel's decarbonization roadmap has been updated to include the acceleration in the development of renewables and the reduction in thermal capacity defined in the new 2021-2023 Strategic Plan and in the 2030 ambitions presented on the Capital Markets Day 2020. New goals in
(1)
(2)
(tCO2eq)
Includes all direct emissions (GHG Scope 1), 99% of which are due solely to energy generation, in line with the 1.5 °C pathway of the Science Based
Targets initiative.
Includes all indirect emissions (GHG Scope 3 - Use of Sold Products) relating to gas sales in the retail market by 2030, in line with the 2 °C pathway
of the Science Based Targets initiative.
line with the Paris Agreement have been defined, in particular the percentage of reduction in Scope 1 emissions at 2030 was increased from 70% to 80% compared to 2017. This target is in line with a 1,5 °C pathway, as certified by
SBTi.
| GHG goal | Area | Climatic scenario |
Main drivers and actions for reaching the goal | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sho term (2023) |
148 gCO2eq/kWh in 2023 |
100% of Scope 1 GHG emissions(1) |
1.5 °C(2) | > Gradual phase-out of 90% of coal-red capacity during 2021-2023 (percentage weight of coal-red capacity on consolidated capacity from 10.6% in 2020 to approximately 1% in 2023). > Investments equal to 16.8 billion euros to accelerate the development of renewable energy by installing 15.4 GW of new renewable capacity during 2021-2023 to reach 60 GW of renewable capacity by 2023. |
| Medium long term (2030) |
82 gCO2eq/kWh in 2030 (80% reduction compared to baseline year 2017) |
100% of Scope 1 GHG emissions(1) |
1.5 °C, ceŒied by SBTi |
> Acceleration of the abandonment of coal from 2030 until 2027 (gradual elimination of 16 GW of coal-red capacity during the period 2017-2027). > Investments equal to 65 billion euros to accelerate the development of renewable energy by installing 75 GW of renewable capacity during 2021-2030 to reach 120 GW of consolidated renewable capacity by 2030 (3 times the installed renewable capacity in baseline year 2017). |
| 21.2 mil tCO2eq (16% reduction compared to baseline year 2017) |
100% of Scope 3 emissions related to the sale of natural gas in the end-user market (Scope 3, category "use of sold products") |
2 °C, ceŒied by SBTi |
> Promotion of the customer passage from gas to electricity (especially residential customers). > Optimization of the customer's gas poŒfolio (especially industrial customers).residential customers). |
|
| Long term (2050) |
~0 gCO2eq/kWh by 2050 |
100% of Scope 1 GHG emissions(1)(3) |
1.5 °C(2) | > Goal of gradually eliminating thermal capacity and of reaching a 100% renewable energy mix. |
Decarbonization roadmap in line with the 1.5 °C pathway, SBTi ceied Decarbonization roadmap in line with the 1.5 °C pathway, Decarbonization roadmap in line with


(1) Even if Enel constantly monitors Scope 2 emissions and is actively commied to their reduction, the Company has not set a specic reduction target, as they represent less than 4% of total Scope 1 and Scope 2 emissions in 2017 (baseline year of the target ceied by SBTi). Therefore, they are considered marginal and fall within the criteria of exclusion according to the SBTi methodology, which xes a margin of 5% of total Scope 1 and Scope 2 emissions.

Fuhermore, Enel, as a signatory to the Business Ambition for 1.5 °C campaign promoted by the United Nations and other institutions, is commied to xing a long-term objective for reaching net-zero emissions along the value chain by 2050, including both direct emissions (Scope 1) and indirect emissions (Scope 2 and 3), together with scientic goals in all peinent areas and in line with the criteria and recommendations of the Science Based Targets initiative (SBTi).
SBTi cei-
ed
(tCO2eq)
direct emissions (GHG Scope 1), 99% of which are due solely to energy generation, in line with the 1.5 °C pathway of the Science Based Targets initiative.
GAS RETAIL 2 GAS RETAIL 2
(2) Includes all indirect emissions (GHG Scope 3 - Use of Sold Products) relating to gas sales in the retail market by 2030, in line with the 2 °C pathway of the Science Based Targets initiative. (1) Includes all direct emissions (GHG Scope 1), 99% of which are due solely to energy generation, in line with the 1.5 °C pathway of the Science Based Targets initiative.
the 1.5 °C pathway,
SBTi cei-
ed
(tCO2eq)
2017 2018 2019 2020 2030
(2) Includes all indirect emissions (GHG Scope 3 - Use of Sold Products) relating to gas sales in the retail market by 2030, in line with the 2 °C pathway of the Science Based Targets initiative.

The main metrics and nancial goals regarding the risks and oppounities connected to climate change, as well as the operational metrics along the entire value chain and the environmental ones, are repoed below.
302-1 EU1 EU2 EU3 EU11 EU30
| Financial metric | UM | 2020 | 2019 | 2020-2019 | % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ordinary EBITDA for low-carbon products, services and tech | bil euros | 15.6 | 16.2 | -0.6 | -3.8 |
| nologies (1) (2) | % of tot EBITDA | 87 | 91 | -4 | - |
| Capex for low-carbon products, services and technologies (1) | bil euros | 9.6 | 9.1 | 0.5 | 4.9 |
| % of tot Capex | 94 | 92 | 2 | - | |
| Revenues from coal plants | bil euros | 1.6 | 2.8 | -1.2 | -42.0 |
| % of tot Revenues | 2.5 | 3.5 | -1.0 | - | |
| Revenues from thermal generation | bil euros | 7.5 | 10.3 | -2.8 | -27.1 |
| % of tot Revenues | 11.6 | 12.8 | -1.2 | - | |
| Revenues from nuclear plants | bil euros | 1.4 | 1.3 | 0.1 | 4.9 |
| % of tot Revenues | 2.1 | 1.6 | 0.5 | - | |
| Debt ratio with sustainability criteria (3) | % | 33 | 22 | 11 | - |
| CO2 reference price |
euros | 24.7 | 24.8 | -0.1 | -0.3 |
(1) The "low-carbon products, services and technologies" category considers the Global Power Generation (excluding conventional generation), Infrastructure and Networks, Enel X and Market Business Lines (excluding the sale of gas).
(2) The 2019 value was redened to account for the fact that in Latin America and Noh America (Mexico), the values concerning large customers managed by the generation companies were reallocated to the Market Business Line.
(3) The value was calculated considering the impact of the nancial instruments, which include sustainability criteria for the entire gross debt.
In 2020, Enel's ordinary EBITDA associated with low-carbon emission technologies, services and solutions equals 15.6 billion euros, with a 3.9% reduction compared to 2019, mainly due to the impact of the Covid-19 emergency on the sale of energy to end users, which was paially compensated by greater generation of renewables. The Capex dedicated to low-carbon emission technologies, services and solutions has increased as compared to 2019, reaching 9.5 billion euros, equal to 94% of total Capex.
Revenues from coal plants, following the Company's strategic decisions that have inspired a sustainable business model that pursues, among others, the objectives of ghting climate change and decarbonization, are continuing to decrease. In paicular, in 2020 revenues related to coal plants amounted to 1.6 billion euros (a 42.0% decrease as compared to 2019), equal to 2.5% of the Group's total revenues. Fuhermore, total revenues from thermal generation (coal, oil & gas and CCGT) represent 11.6% of total revenues, equaling 7.5 billion euros (a 27.1% decrease as compared to 2019).
Enel's strategy of promoting a sustainable nancial model has contributed to reaching 33% of the debt related to the sustainability objectives.
Enel's strategy of promoting a sustainable nancial model has contributed to reaching 33% of the debt related to the sustainability objectives.
| Segmento della catena del valore dell'ele¡ricità Operational metric |
UM | 2020 | 2019 | 2020-2019 | % | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GENERATION | Net installed maximum capacity (1) | GW | 84.0 | 84.3 | -0.3 | -0.4 |
| - of which renewables | % | 53.6 | 50.0 | 3.6 | - | |
| - of which thermoelectric | % | 42.4 | 46.1 | -3.7 | - | |
| - of which nuclear | % | 4.0 | 3.9 | 0.1 | - | |
| Net generation (2) | TWh | 207.1 | 229.1 | -22.0 | -9.6 | |
| - of which renewables | % | 50.9 | 43.4 | 7.5 | - | |
| - of which thermoelectric | % | 36.6 | 45.1 | -8.5 | - | |
| - of which nuclear | % | 12.5 | 11.5 | 1.0 | - | |
| Additional indicators | ||||||
| Average thermoelectric park eŒciency (%) (3) | % | 44.2 | 42.0 | 2.2 | - | |
| Total direct fuel consumption | Mtep | 23.9 | 30.1 | -6.2 | -20.6 | |
| DISTRIBUTION | Digitalization | |||||
| End users with active sma– meters (4) | no. | 44,292,794 | 43,821,596 | 471,198 | 1.1 | |
| Sma– meters (coverage) | % | 60 | 59 | 1 | - | |
| RETAIL | ElectriŽcation, energy e¢ciency and digitalization |
|||||
| Charging points for electric mobility (5) | .000 | 105 | 80 | 25 | 32.3 | |
| Electric buses | .000 | 0.9 | 0.3 | 0.6 | 220 | |
| Sma– public lighting | mil | 2.7 | 2.4 | 0.3 | 12 | |
| New services | ||||||
| Demand response capacity | MW | 6,038 | 6,297 | -259 | -4.1 | |
| Storage capacity | MW | 123 | 110 | 13 | 11.8 |
(1) Does not include managed capacity, equal to 3.6 GW in 2020 and 3.7 GW in 2019.
(2) Does not include generation from managed capacity, equal to 9.9 TWh in 2020 and 10.2 TWh in 2019.
(3) The values do not include consumption and generation for the cogeneration related to the Russian thermoelectric park. The average eciency value is calculated based on the plants in the park and weighed based on generation values.
(4) The 2019 data has been redened following an update to the repoing method.
(5) Installed public and private charging stations. Including interoperability points, the value is equal to 186 thousand in 2020.
The generation of electricity in 2020 has a decrease of 22 TWh (-9.6%) compared to the value recorded in 2019. In paicular, this decrease results from the reduced generation from thermal power (-27.5 TWh), mainly due to reduced coal-red generation (-24.4 TWh), which was partially compensated by greater generation from renewable sources (+6.0 TWh).
The energy Enel produced in 2020 from zero emissions sources amounts to more than 63% of total consolidated generation (a signicant increase in comparison to 2019, equal to 55%), whereas it is equal to 65% including the generation of capacity managed according to the Stewardship model (equal to 9.9 TWh in 2020).


Coal-red 10.6%
Fuel-oil and
Combined-cycle
17.9%
Nuclear
Wind
Geothermal and other 1.1%
Solar
303-3
The following table presents the environmental metrics related to climate change, in addition to the greenhouse gas emissions previously described in the dedicated paragraph of this chapter.
| Environmental metric | UM | 2020 | 2019 | 2020-2019 | % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Specic water withdrawal for total generation (1) | l/kWh | 0.20 | 0.33 | -0.13 | -39.4 |
| Water withdrawal in water stressed areas (1)(2) | % | 23 | 25 | 2 | - |
| Generation with water withdrawal in water stressed areas (2) | % | 11 | 8 | 3 | - |
| 33.1% 14.8% Geothermal and Total renewable sources 53.6% other 1.1% |
4.6% Coal-red 10.6% |
turbo-gas 13.9% Total traditional sources 46.4% |
4.0% Combined-cycle 17.9% |
|||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hydroelectric 33.1% |
Wind 14.8% |
Solar 4.6% |
Fuel-oil and turbo-gas 13.9% |
Nuclear 4.0% |
||
| 2019 Total renewable sources 53.6% |
Geothermal and other 1.0% |
Coal-red 13.8% |
Total traditional sources 46.4% 17.8% |
Total 84.3 GW Combined-cycle |
(1) Based on the classication provided by the WRI "Aqueduct Water Risk Atlas", the water stressed areas are those where the ratio between the total annual withdrawal of su¥ace water or groundwater for dierent uses (civil, industrial, agricultural and livestock) and the total annual renewable water supply available ("base water stress", understood, therefore, as the level of competition between all users) is high (40-80%) or extremely high (>80%). By way of greater envi-
NET EFFICIENT INSTALLED CAPACITY BY SOURCE (%) 2020 Total 84.0 GW In order to contribute toward the decarbonization of its energy mix, in 2020 Enel increased its renewable installed capacity by 2.9 GW, while reducing its coal-red capacity by 2.8 GW. As a result, consolidated installed capacity from zero emissions sources is approximately 58% (54% consid-Hydroelectric 27.3% Wind 11.7% Solar 1.7% Total renewable sources 43.4%
| 2020 | Total 207.1 TWh | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Geothermal and other 3.0% |
6.3% | Coal-red Combined-cycle 20.9% |
||
| Hydroelectric 2020 30.1% |
NET ELECTRICITY GENERATION BY SOURCE (%) Wind 15.0% |
Solar 2.8% |
Fuel-oil and turbo-gas 9.4% |
Nuclear Total 207.1 TWh 12.5% |
| Geothermal and Total renewable sources 50.9% other 3.0% |
6.3% | Coal-red Combined-cycle Total traditional sources 49.1% 20.9% |
| 2019 | Total 229.1 TWh | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total renewable sources 50.9% Geothermal and other 2.7% |
Coal-red 16.4% |
Total traditional sources 49.1% Combined-cycle 19.6% |
||
| Hydroelectric 27.3% 2019 |
Wind 11.7% |
Solar 1.7% |
Fuel-oil and turbo-gas 9.1% |
Nuclear 11.5% Total 229.1 TWh |
| Total renewable sources 43.4% Geothermal and other 2.7% |
Coal-red 16.4% |
Total traditional sources 56.6% Combined-cycle 19.6% |


(2) Even if the indicator shows an increased percentage of withdrawals and consumption in water stressed areas, the absolute values show a decrease com-
Fuel-oil and turbo-gas 14.5% Nuclear 3.9% Hydroelectric 33.0% Wind 12.3% Solar 3.7% Total renewable sources 50.0% Total traditional sources 50.0% Total 84.3 GW Combined-cycle 17.8% Coal-red 13.8% Fuel-oil and turbo-gas 14.5% Nuclear 3.9% Geothermal and other 1.0% Hydroelectric 33.0% Wind 12.3% Solar 3.7% Total renewable sources 50.0% Total traditional sources 50.0% 2019
ering only renewable sources) of Enel's total consolidated installed capacity in 2020, whereas it is greater than 59% (56% considering only renewable sources) when including capacity managed according to the Stewardship model (equal to 3.6 GW in 2020). Total traditional sources 56.6% Fuel-oil and turbo-gas 9.1% Nuclear 11.5%
Fuel-oil and turbo-gas 9.4% Nuclear 12.5%
Hydroelectric
30.1%
Wind 15.0% Solar 2.8%
In 2020, Enel played a fundamental role in developing new solutions for accelerating the process of energy transition through the development of 13 MW of storage capacity, corresponding to a growth of 12% in comparison to 2019, and maintaining the approximate 6 GW of demand response basically unvaried compared to 2019.
The digitalization of the electricity grid, which has been identied as a key enabler able to positively inuence climate change through levers such as the integration of more renewable energy or an increase in energy eciency, continued being a priority for Enel also in 2020. In paicular, in 2020 the total number of end users with active sma
meters grew 1.1% as compared to the previous year, reaching 44.3 million in 2020.
Enel has also continued dening solutions for promoting the decarbonization of other sectors, such as transpo. The Company is in fact commi©ed to developing electrical mobility initiatives and promoting sustainable transpo, reaching more than 105 thousand installed charging points at the end of 2020, a 32.3% increase in comparison to 2019.
Targets
scribed in the previous section.
Fuhermore, the following assumptions were dened:

Finally, Enel is commi©ed to improving its pe¥ormance in other environmental aspects concerning climate change, xing increasingly ambitious goals, such as the 65% reduction in water requirements for the electricity generation process by 2030. For more information about Enel's environmental pe¥ormance, refer to the "Environmental sustainability" chapter of the Sustainability Repo 2020 (available on the site's Sustainability section: h©ps://www.enel. com/investors/biodiversity).
| Segment of the electricity value chain |
Target description | UM | 2023 | 2030 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net installed maximum capacity (1) | GW | >90 | >170 | |||||
| - of which renewables | % | 65 | >80 | |||||
| - of which thermoelectric | % | 31 | - | |||||
| - of which nuclear | % | 4 | - | |||||
| Net generation (2) | TWh | 245 | ~400 | |||||
| - of which renewables | % | 65 | ~80 | |||||
| GENERATION | - of which thermoelectric | % | 24 | - | ||||
| - of which nuclear | % | 11 | - | |||||
| New services | ||||||||
| Generation with storage system (BESS) | TWh | - | 20 | |||||
| New hybrid renewable plants with storage (BESS) | % | - | 30 | |||||
| Generation of green hydrogen | .000 t | 5 | >90 | |||||
| Installed green hydrogen capacity | GW | 0.12 | >2 | |||||
| New hybrid renewable plants with hydrogen | % | - | 8 | |||||
| DISTRIBUTION | Digitalization | |||||||
| Sma– meter | mil | 49 | >90 | |||||
| Sma– meters (coverage) | % | 64 | 100 | |||||
| ElectriŽcation, energy e¢ciency and digitalization | ||||||||
| Charging points for electric mobility | mil | 0.78 | >4 | |||||
| Electric buses | .000 | 5.5 | >10 | |||||
| MARKET | Sma– public lighting | mil | 3.4 | >4 | ||||
| New services | ||||||||
| Demand response capacity | GW | 10.6 | 20 | |||||
| Storage capacity | MW | 527 | - |
(1) Does not include managed capacity, equal to 7.6 GW in 2023.
(2) Does not include generation from managed capacity, equal to 20 TWh in 2023.


| Activities | 2020-2022 targets | 2020 results | Status | 2021-2023 targets | Tag | SDG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| New producer connections - power (Italy and Spain) |
4.3 GW over the period 2020-2022 |
2.9 GW | ON-PLAN | 9.0 GW over the period 2021-2023 |
I E |
|
| Rural electrification - grid extension and microgrid solutions7 |
231 thousand connections over the period 2021-2023 |
I E S |
||||
| Charging points8 | 736 thousand charging points |
186 thousand charging points |
ON-PLAN | ~780 thousand9 charging points |
I E G T |
|
| Storage and real-time demand response |
439 MW of storage 10.1 GW of demand response |
123 MW of storage 6.0 GW of demand response |
ON-PLAN | 527 MW of storage 10.6 GW of demand response10 |
I E S T |
|
| Inclusive o ers dedicated to customers - Italy |
"Over 65" offer: remodelling of the offer dedicated to customers over 65 on all Enel channels |
2,800 customers "Over 65" involved |
ON-PLAN | 12 thousand customers "Over 65" involved by 2023 |
I S |
|
| Activities, products and services dedicated to customers with disabilities |
• Analysis of the customer experience for customers with disabilities and final qualitative assessment • Promoting accessible products and services • Promoting "slow shopping" and inclusive offers |
I S |

102-15

ELECTRIFICATION, DIGITAL AND PLATFORMS
| At a Glance | 2 | 3 Our ESG peormance |
Trend Topic | 4 | Appendix | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Priorities | Plan | SDG | ||||
| A Energy distri bution C Customer focus |
||||||
| Ecosystems D and platforms Economic and F ‹nancial value creation |
Electri‹cation, digital and platforms | |||||
| Target | ||||||
| Activities | 2020-2022 targets | 2020 results | Status | 2021-2023 targets | Tag | SDG |
| Innovation and digitisation | ~47 million end users | 44.3 million end users | ON-PLAN | 49 million end users with | I | |
| of the distribution networks |
with active smart meter | with active smart meter | active smart meter by 20231 | E | ||
| G | ||||||
| T | ||||||
| SAIDI (min) | 259 | 2282 in 2023 | I | |||
| E | ||||||
| S | ||||||
| SAIFI (no.) | 2.53 in 2023 | I | ||||
| E | ||||||
| S | ||||||
| Cabling ratio (km of cable | 64% | 60.4% | OFF-PLAN | 63%4 by 2023 | I | |
| lines/km of lines in total) | E | |||||
| S | ||||||
| Network losses (Italy)5 | 4.7% | 4.7%6 | ON-PLAN | 4.7% in 2023 | I | |
| E | ||||||
| New producer connections (Italy and |
280 thousand new connections over the |
58,598 new connections |
OFF-PLAN | 283 thousand new connections in the |
I E |
|
| Spain) | period 2020-2022 | period 2021-2023 |
(1) The target for 2030 is ~90 mil end users with active sma meter.
(2) The target for 2030 is ~100 min.
(3) The target for 2030 is ~2.
(4) Target redened as it is strictly dependent on the network construction and maintenance activities, which have been signicantly cut back due to the pandemic.
(5) Includes the technical losses (Joule e ect) and non-technical losses (energy theft) of e-distribuzione (Italy).
(6) Estimated gure. The nal gure will be available at the end of September 2021.
(7) The scope includes Argentina, Brazil, Chile, Colombia, Peru and Romania.
(8) Public and private charging points installed. Includes interoperability points, net of which there are 105 thousand charging points installed at the end of 2020.
(9) The target for 2030 is >4 million charging points.
(10) The target for 2030 is ~20 GW.
E
Everywhere commerce - Electronic payment (% of digital payments/total payments)
Customers who use digital services12 (mil users/year)
Customers who use digital services via app13 (mil users/year)
| Activities | 2020-2022 targets | 2020 results | Status | 2021-2023 targets | Tag | SDG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Everywhere commerce – Electronic billing (% of customers using digital billing) |
||||||
| Italy Market | ~60% | I | ||||
| Iberia Market | 36% | E | ||||
| Romania Market | 38% | T | ||||
| Chile Market | 32% | |||||
| Colombia Market | 35% | |||||
| Peru Market | 13% | |||||
| Argentina Market | 23% | |||||
| Brazil Market | 17% |
| Italy Market | ~50% | I | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| E | ||||
| T | ||||
Paperless: online sales, archiving and digitalization of documents, digital bills, interactive bills
| Italy Market | 6.9 | 4.9 | ON-PLAN | 8.0 | I | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Iberia Market | 6.0 | S | ||||
| Romania Market | 1.7 | T |
| Chile Market 0.66 I |
|
|---|---|
| S Colombia Market 1.65 |
|
| T Peru Market 0.33 |
|
| Argentina Market 0.55 |
|
| Brazil Market 8.80 |
| Activities | 2020-2022 targets | 2020 results | Status | 2021-2023 targets | Tag | SDG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Voice of customer for ongoing improvement | ||||||
| Italy Market Customer Satisfaction Index Enel Energia SpA (% - value from 1 to 100) |
~91% | 91.9% | ON-PLAN | 92.3% | I S T |
|
| Italy Market Perceived quality11 (value from 1 to 5) |
Value between 4 and 5 4.2 | ON-PLAN | 4.3 | |||
| Iberia Market - Customer Satisfaction Index (index - value from 0 to 10) |
7.4 | 7.5 | ||||
| Romania Market - Customer Satisfaction Index (index - value from 1 to 10) |
8.2 | 8.0 | ||||
| Chile Market - Customer Satisfaction Index (% - value from 1 to 100) |
73% | |||||
| Italy Market | • Digitalization of some credit documents (reminders and warnings) • Increasing use of tablets by the sales force to sign contracts |
6.2 million digital communications sent to customers |
ON-PLAN | • 5.9 million digital communications sent to customers • 65% of sales made via tablets, compared to total sales made through channels that use tablets |
I E T |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Romania Market | 2.1 million digital communications sent to customers |
(11) This indicator measures the quality perceived by the customer on a monthly basis compared to the last contact with Enel Energia. (12) This indicator measures the number of users who use the digital services oered (web/app) at least once during the year. (13) This indicator measures the number of users who use digital services via apps at least once during the year. New

Goals
Industrial Environmental Social Governance Technological Redened Outdated E
| Redefined |
|---|
102-15 ELECTRIFICATION, DIGITAL AND PLATFORMS
The emergency situation that characterized 2020 has highlighted the essential need to continue guaranteeing the production, distribution and sale of energy as unforsakeable services.
Reliability, safety and continuity of distribution, innovation, customized digitalization, together with quality, eectiveness and transparency in the sale of energy and services have characterized and characterize each stage of our relationship with customers. We are commi©ed to remain customer centric, providing them with quality products and services throughout the world.
In 2020, 484.6 TWh were transpoed on the Group's distribution grid (507.7 TWh in 2019) and the nal number of energy and gas customers was almost 70 million, much the same as in 2019 (70 million). Energy sales amounted to 298.2 TWh in 2020, down by 7.4% compared to 2019. Enel also manages a demand response capacity of around 6 GW.
103-2 103-3 DMA EU (former EU23) DMA EU (former EU7)
The future of the world depends on successful acceleration of the energy transition; today, the distribution network plays an impoant role in facilitating this evolution, suppoing the decarbonization and electrication processes. In the coming years, it will be essential to increase the use of electricity in all those sectors that still rely heavily on fossil fuels, while ensuring at the same time that the grid is capable of carrying an ever higher percentage of renewable: currently the most sustainable and economic form of energy generation.
As a modern DSO (Distribution System Operator), we tackle the dual challenge of remaining viuous in modern economies and helping the emerging economies to access energy.
The grid must become ever more 'intelligent', modern and digital. At the same time, as physical infrastructure in the territory, the grid is ever more exposed to such climate change related phenomena as ooding, drought, scorch-


ing heat and extreme cold. This can be addressed by increasing the security, resilience and reliability of grids, in order to continue guaranteeing high service quality standards to the end customer.
Today, our Grid is 'networked', which means that electricity can be distributed from a point of generation to a point of delivery via various possible routes. This structure implements the concept of resilience, being the ability of the Grid to suddenly nd an alternate supply route if there is a fault on the usual route.
Given the vast size and complexity of our Grid, which comprises 2.2 million km of lines throughout the world, the monitoring and management of these recongurations in the shoest possible time require a high degree of digitalization. Due to the remote collection in real time of large quantities of data about the state of the grid, today's technology enables us to respond suddenly to alterations affecting our lines. This data is collected and processed in control centers, which have real-time information about the state of the entire Grid so that it can be monitored and remote action can be taken. Thanks to this data and digital intelligence, it is also possible to enhance Grid automation and reduce response times considerably.
For this system to work, we need data collection devices like the digital meter that, in addition to measuring consumption, enable us to take remote action. This meter in fact talks to other nodes, the concentrators, that for now
| High voltage |
Medium voltage |
Low voltage |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Romania | 5% | 27% | 68% |
| Iberia | 6% | 36% | 58% |
| Italy | (1) | 31% | 69% |
| Latin America | 3% | 62% | 35% |
| Total (%) | 2% | 40% | 58% |
| Total (km) | 46,661 | 894,282 | 1,291,018 |
ELECTRICITY DISTRIBUTION NETWORK BY GEOGRAPHICAL AREA (Total km 2,231,961)
| Electricity market customers |
Gas market customers |
|
|---|---|---|
| Romania | 3,049,476 | 59,379 |
| Iberia | 10,420,495 | 1,673,424 |
| Italy | 22,612,004 | 4,060,646 |
| Latin America | 27,642,485 | 23 |
| Total | 63,724,460 | 5,793,472 |
(1) In Italy there is also 22 km of high-voltage network.
E lectrification and digitalization guide our new relations with our customers. We have created an ecosystem of products and services that make sustainability accessible to everyone.
R educe environmental impact, generate cost savings, ensure a high quality experience: this is what the new generation of customers expects from players like us who are committed to sustainability and who aim to become the best reference point on the market.
Our aim is to accelerate the transition of our customers towards sustainable conduct by supplying innovative energy solutions through global digital platforms.
ELECTRICITY TRANSPORTED
on the Group's distribution network, down 4.5% compared
to 2019
298.2
TWh
ELECTRICITY SOLD, down 7.4% compared
to 2019
69.5
million
RETAIL CUSTOMERS
electricity and gas

DISTRIBUTION NETWORK
484.6
TWh
Enel X
organize the measurement data before transferring it to our systems, but which will soon become key data processing centers. This data is aggregated via the secondary and primary substations, before arriving at the central infrastructure. Digitalization of the entire chain from us to the customer means that all this activity can be carried out quickly and in a secure manner.
Sma meters are therefore the cornerstone of distribution grid innovation and digitalization work, the driving force behind urban redevelopment and fundamental enablers of advanced home automation. From the beginning, their installation has been accompanied by specic information and awareness campaigns, given that energy savings of 10% can be achieved by using this technology, paicularly thanks to the real time availability of energy use information.
At the end of 2020, 44.3 million end users had an active sma meter and 18.2 million end users had second generation meters (CE2G).
In addition to transmi©ing detailed measurement data
(daily 15-minute load curves) to the concentrator, the la©er provide a customer-dedicated communication channel for access to such services as demand response, energy e ciency (for example, a warning that available power is being exceeded and the limiter is being activated), the promotion of awareness and home automation, and the customization of taris, allowing the introduction of innovative forms of contract. A more advanced communication standard will be introduced during 2021, making new Active-Demand applications available. We have also launched the "Circular Sma Meter" project, which aims to reduce the environmental footprint of sma meters through, for example, the end-of-life use of their materials, staing with plastic and copper. For fuher details, see the "Circular economy" chapter of this document.
In this context, the distributor plays a new role as system orchestrator, since the grid is not just a highway for electrons, but also the trac warden who directs the ow and the 'service station' that oers new oppounities.

A Grid is usually established to meet local needs and so there are many variants. Grid Blue Sky seeks to go beyond this reality by imagining the unied management of all our grids. In past years, the vision focused too much on the autonomy of specic grids, considering them as stand-alone entities with li©le mutual interaction. Grids that were added over time, without achieving a unied vision and level of service.
In order to tackle these challenges, a "platform" model is being adopted with two objectives: on the one hand, create an ecosystem that makes available business processes and solutions via Grid Blue Sky, in order to improve the economic and service pe¥ormance provided to customers; on the other, build a new model for the grid of the future, Grid Futurability, designed to improve the context in which we live, in both the sho and long terms. Innovation becomes systemic with Grid Futurability, digitalization and automation make the grid ever more resilient and exible while, at the same time, the platform model helps to make cites more sustainable and to provide new services based on the diering urban and rural contexts, thus maximizing value for both customers and the grid. The purpose of platformization is therefore to make possible and guarantee the full integration of sustainability within the value chain. Lastly, during 2020 an analysis was carried out in the context of the Grid Blue Sky project, in order to identify the most signicant topics in relation to the UN sustainable development goals. The principal actions focus in two main directions: the reduction of greenhouse gas emissions (paly via a major eo to digitalize processes) and the proling of new data elds, being platform parameters used to suppo the decision-making process when developing new technical solutions and to enhance stakeholders engagement.
The Grid is also a 'mine of materials' that, suitably regenerated, can be used as inputs for the production of new assets or new products in other productive value chains. Adopting a "grid mining" approach, the entire value chain of grid assets is being analyzed with a view to improving long-term value creation and incorporating the "Circular by design" principle right from the asset design stage. The idea is to rethink productive processes, limiting the use of virgin materials, increasing the resilience of the supply chain and reducing environmental impacts such as, rstly, the emission of climate-altering gases. A number of grid mining solutions are being tested or sought, considering the high volume of end-of-life assets retired in the various countries. They need to have a scalable business model or be paicularly a©ractive in terms of the volumes acquired in the marketplace and installed on the grid.
Accordingly, work continued during 2020 on integrating the creation of stakeholder value (CSV) model and the circular economy within our business processes and, in paicular,

within the supply chain, in order to improve the sustainable footprint of the grid via the proactive and inclusive engagement of stakeholders and the adoption of solutions that maximize value creation.
The Urban Futurability project is one of the most representative examples. Here, due to design work that included the stakeholders, the platform model for the grid has made it possible to devise new services for citizens and where, for the rst time, an urban sustainable work site model has been applied to the cable-laying process, adopting solutions that reduce the environmental impact and the inconvenience felt by citizens.
The continuous improvement of infrastructure becomes central to the socio-economic development of communities, as well as for the daily life of people. This is fully consistent with the commitments made in relation to the UN's Sustainable Development Goals and in paicular SDG 9 "Infrastructure and innovation".
Rethinking one's business by applying an ecosystem and circular logic also means identifying new oppounities to put customers at the center, oering customized products and services, to build and strengthen a relationship based on trust, transparency and rational use of energy. In fact, the customer is ever more interested in the strategic business steps taken towards a sustainable economy. Consumers wish to contribute, via their decisions, to the protection of the planet, but they only choose the sustainable options if they are more economic and practical, with superior pe¥ormance.
Our primary objective is to guarantee a high level quality service and maximize customer satisfaction, anticipating market needs in order to ensure reliable responses and establish lasting relations with customers, based on dialog, collaboration and trust: aspects that refer not only to the supply of electricity and/or natural gas, but also and above all to the intangible aspects of the service perceived by the customer. We strive constantly to improve the channels and methods by which contacts are made, our back oce processes, and the monitoring of complaints and requests for information, in order to reduce response times and ensure proper management. We dedicate great a©ention to the analysis of customer repos, in order to understand customer perception and any critical issues in progress, so that the appropriate corrective actions can be implemented immediately without compromising overall customer satisfaction.
In 2020, we promoted the adoption of new solutions and innovative technologies aimed at improving the customer experience and also involving staups and stakeholders, as well as sharing best practices in order to spread them to the various countries of operation with specic market-related customizations, thus minimizing time-tomarket. Relations with consumer associations have been intensied, exploring collaboration oppounities aimed at improving the relationship with customers and working together to create services that increasingly respond to new needs and requirements, without neglecting the weaker sections of the population.
In 2020, due to the pandemic, our communication channels had to adapt to the new way of working from home, ensuring the eciency and eectiveness of our customer relationships. Thanks to a globally coordinated eo, based on promoting digital channels, various measures were successfully taken to meet the growing needs of customers, in line with restrictions on mobility and social distancing.
Pu©ing the customer at the center means developing new relationship models that promote listening and involvement to ensure the continuous improvement of services. We also strive to enhance the contribution that each individual customer can make to decreasing their impact on the planet, adopting consumption styles geared towards the use of renewable energy, recycling and reuse, sharing and reducing waste, staing with paper contracts and bills. A push to simplify all stages of the customer journey by disseminating innovative services that suppo the customer, from the signing of new exclusively paperless contracts and simple interactions to check energy use and receive digital bills, to electronic payments, including instalment plans, through viual assistants, apps and chatbots. Enel's commitment to the right energy transition for everyone puts it at the forefront in oering innovative and inclusive services for elderly, weak, destitute or marginalized customers, vulnerable families or disabled persons (Pedius, Braille bill, compatible sites for the visually impaired). For fuher information about customer management in the various countries, in addition to the following paragraphs, please refer to the individual Sustainability Repos of Enel Group's subsidiaries.
102-43 102-44 103-2 103-3 417-1
The a©ention paid to service quality issues is conrmed again this year by the results of customer satisfaction surveys carried out in all the countries where Enel operates as an electricity vendor or distributor.
In Italy, despite the pandemic, the customer satisfaction index (CSI)1 for 2020 was 93.8 for the regulated market (92.4 in 2019) and 91.9 for the free market (90.2 in 2019), with improvements in both markets.
In addition, monthly satisfaction surveys are carried out among customers who have received an answer to a wri©en or verbal complaint. The survey is conducted by telephone interview after a response has been sent or the customer has been contacted by telephone.
In Iberia, through the subsidiary Endesa, ecient customer service is the main value pursued in the relationship with customers, striving for maximum eciency in the operation of its customer service channels, tools and platforms through a process of constant innovation and improvement. 20 key indicators are monitored every month, to ensure constant improvement of the customer relationship compared to the previous year. The CSI has

been rising over the years, reaching 7.32 for the free market (7.3 in 2019) and climbing to 7.7 (7.2 in 2019) for the regulated market in 2020.
In Romania, customers can voice their opinions via the contact center, e-mail and website. Information is gathered once a month and the results are used to improve the service quality and business processes.
The general satisfaction index was 8.22 for the free market and 8.43 for the regulated market.
In Latin America, customer satisfaction indicators are a fundamental consideration when dening strategies and designing new products. In Brazil, customer satisfaction is measured every year using several specic indices. The principal index is calculated by the Brazilian association of electricity distributors (ABRADEE - Associação Brasileira de Distribuidores de Energia Elétrica). This index is determined after conducting a sample survey among customers on such aspects as: energy supply, information and communication, utility bills, customer suppo and image. No less impoant, the IASC index (customer satisfaction indicator) is calculated by the Brazilian regulator, Aneel - Agência Nacional de Energia Elétrica, after conducting a sample survey of residential customers on such aspects as customer care, reliability, information and price. Lastly, the NPS (Net Promoter Score) determines the percentages of satised and dissatised customers based on responses to the question: "How likely are you to recommend our company to a friend or colleague?".
Surveys are also carried out in Peru, using structured and standardized questionnaires, among people who have used the contact point services. Finally, in Colombia, there is a customer satisfaction form designed to measure market perception of the supply of products and services in order to direct initiatives and the respective resources more ef ciently. The quality satisfaction index (ISCAL), the key elements of which include the commercial relationship and billing, has remained at excellent levels in recent years, thanks to the development of the customer relationship plan.
In Chile, a new methodology was applied in 2020 in order to obtain more direct customer feedback. This replaced the previous electricity service quality indicator (ICSE) and makes reference to the "nal satisfaction", as represented by the direct response given to the question "How satised are you with the service provided by Enel?", with a choice of predetermined answers. The survey was carried out in the form of online panels with a statistically-valid sample providing results with about 99% condence.
We are transforming the lives of many families that have been waiting decades for electricity. We are delivering energy to more than 130 families in rural Cavalcante, in the State of Goiás. We have installed over 600 poles and built 33 km of new grids. This is the fouh rural connection project completed by Enel, in collaboration with the government of Goiás, in less than six months.
Around one hundred isolated communities have been connected using ogrid solutions, under a plan that will continue throughout 2021. In paicular, to facilitate installation of the technical solution identied and ensure that it meets the needs of the communities served, a preliminary eld analysis involved about 1,100 potential users so that their territorial conditions and requirements could be understood be©er. This work made it possible to improve the energy access solutions employed (ogrid, grid extension) and, at the same time, contribute to the development of the communities via new training projects, new skills and enhance tourism and social cohesion.
(1) Value is calculated on a scale of 1 to 100. The values for 2020 have been estimated on the basis of established trends. Following a change of methodology, from 2018, the CSI value is determined annually rather than half-yearly as it was in 2017 and 2016.
(2) The calculation method has changed: from a scale to 100, to a scale to 10.
102-17 102-43 103-2 103-3
In all the countries where Enel operates, customers have various channels available through which to make a complaint or request information (post, website, toll-free number). Enel constantly monitors the feedback received, in order to understand the customer's perception and any ongoing critical issues and to implement the appropriate corrective actions. In Italy, for example, through Enel Energia, the Enel Group monitors the commercial quality of all its contact channels, systematically monitoring the sales and management processes. The goal is to ensure the fulllment of requirements in compliance with current legislation, privacy and rules protecting the freedom and dignity of workers. Customer repos are managed through dedicated channels and analyzed by a specic working group so that the most suitable actions are taken, both at the complaint management stage and, above all, in preventing the underlying causes. This year, in Italy, there was a reduction in the time required to manage complaints, which fell below the threshold times required by ARERA (Regulatory Authority for Energy, Networks and the Environment) and simultaneously increased the satisfaction of complaining customers.
In Iberia, complaints are managed both centrally by the "Atención de Reclamaciones" (a©ention to complaints) unit and locally through six local units, in order to prevent any disruptions and determine the appropriate tools needed to resolve them, thus improving the eciency of the process. The use of the new complaint management model introduced in 2019 was consolidated in 2020, with a digitalized view of the complaints and an end-to-end approach to the process that has made it even more e cient, with shoer processing times and a more positive customer perception.
In Romania, customers can send repos using dierent channels: dedicated e-mail address for complaints and requests, website, direct call center helpline or even visit a Punto Enel.
In Colombia, a digital transformation of the process has staed and an automated procedure (RPA - Robot Process Automation) adopted for the management of complaints about energy usage, in order to speed up the process of responding to customers.
In Brazil, a customer experience team analyzes the caus-
es of complaints using analytical tools (e.g. geographical analysis of complaints), surveys and forums with customers themselves, to develop improvement actions.
In Chile, major action was taken to improve the customer experience via contact channels and on-site visits, thus enhancing customer satisfaction and reducing the number of complaints. In order to implement this "Service quality plan", it was necessary to adopt new guidelines for assessing the contact channel, deliver training courses to employees, develop new Customer Relationship Management (CRM) functions, and develop repos to monitor delayed orders and the key satisfaction indicators. This plan has resulted in a 16% reduction in the number of complaints.
We want to remain a©entive to the needs of citizens, improving and maintaining access to electricity in the most disadvantaged areas and among the poorest populations. All the countries in which the Group operates in fact provide forms of suppo, often linked to state initiatives, which make it easier for ceain sections of the population to pay electricity and gas bills, thus allowing equal access to energy.
In Italy, since 2008 for the electricity sector and 2009 for the gas sector, a discount has been provided for domestic customers experiencing nancial hardship and – for the electricity sector only – for customers who use life-saving electro-medical equipment (known as the "social bonus"). The bonus is funded with state resources and specic tari components determined by the Authority.
Applications for the bonus are handled by the local municipality and – if approved – customers are awarded a credit on their bill that varies according to their income and number of people in the family. In 2020, the social bonus was awarded to approximately 596,000 customers of Enel Energia and approximately 421,000 customers of Servizio Ele©rico Nazionale. In general, protection is also provided in case of disconnection of the electricity supply: in the event of non-payment, customers who have an electronic meter are not cut o completely but their available power is reduced and only cut o completely if the default persists.

In Iberia, as in the rest of the world, the impact of Covid-19 during 2020 resulted in a healthcare and economic crisis, with complex situations that caused unemployment and temporary dismissals leading to signicant income reductions. For this reason, a decree was approved on September 30, 2020, that includes those aected by these complex situations among the beneciaries of the social bonus until June 30, 2021. In the same way, the social bonus regulation that came into force in 2018 has been retained, with discounts of 25%, 40% or even 100% depending on the level of vulnerability of the customer. At the end of 2020, Endesa granted the social bonus to 369,534 customers, of whom 192,254 vulnerable and 177,280 extremely vulnerable. Fuhermore, since 2014 Endesa has maintained many agreements signed with local/regional authorities and service sector organizations, in order to avoid cuts in supplies to customers recognized as vulnerable by the social services. Currently there are 273 agreements in force, including 7 with autonomous regions and 7 with federations of municipalities; a fuher 3 are under negotiation and the company maintains contacts with 537 municipalities. Consequent to these agreements, in 2020 Endesa responded to 123,364 requests, totaling 30,350,630 euros, from vulnerable customers having diculty in paying their bills. In addition, since 2018 Endesa has oered customers in vulnerable groups the oppounity to pay their bills in interest-free installments and has specic suppo channels. Finally, working with the Endesa Foundation and in collaboration with the Red Cross and Ecodes, Endesa has been promoting an energy volunteering project since 2015 to suppo specic vulnerable situations by providing training on ecient consumption, personalized advice and taking money-saving and safety measures in homes.
In Romania, tailor-made solutions are constantly being sought to meet the needs of the most vulnerable custom-

er groups. Enel has a presence in the Ferentari district of Bucharest, one of the most disadvantaged. By appointing a trusted person from that community, called an "energy mediator", Enel has been able to gain a be©er understanding of local needs to ensure a more appropriate oer of services. The energy mediator also helps the population of the neighborhood to pe¥orm seemingly simple tasks such as reading meters, signing contracts or accompanying local people to the Enel shop when necessary. A similar pilot project will be launched in 2021, in another disadvantaged area in the Faur/Republica district of Bucharest. In Brazil, customers who rely on life-preserving electro-medical equipment have priority over other customers on the telephone channel and their requests are monitored and promptly suppoed. In addition, Enel appropriately manages customers with special subsidies offered by the government, such as the "Social Electricity Tari" (TSEE) subsidy provided for low-income people.
Again in 2020, Enel promoted several initiatives that focused on energy eciency aimed especially at low-income customers: the replacement of fridges and lights, seminars on responsible energy use and household budgeting, inclusion in the social electricity tari lists.
In Chile, action plans have been developed to minimize the impact on customers of the economic crisis associated with the eects of the pandemic. In paicular, as a healthcare precaution, meters were not read in several months during the year and web/social media campaigns were promoted to encourage self-reading by customers. Easy payment options were introduced (ability to agree a specic payment date without interest and up to 12 installments) and specic projects were developed in order to enhance the customer experience via the use of digital channels.
Again in Chile, priority suppo was introduced during 2020 for electricity-dependent (ED) customers, being those who need to be connected to a medical device that runs on electricity. In addition to the installation of generators, 57 new lithium ba©eries had been installed by year end in hospital depaments where the installation of traditional electrical equipment was not possible.
Lastly, in the context of the Value for Disability project (see the "Sound governance" chapter of this document), actions were identied at Group level that will be implemented in the coming years. These include: the sta of slow shopping, being the creation of shops with areas and times dedicated to those who nd shopping stressful or challenging, in which sta are trained to welcome persons with disabilities (e.g. accessible shops, priority service, sign language interpretation, chairs and in-store areas reserved for breaks), targeted oers, annual analysis of the customer experience of persons with disabilities and
related qualitative score, as well as the launch of products designed using the "design for all" technique, which takes account of the needs of everybody, thereby broadening their user base and overall satisfaction.
102-16 103-2 103-3 417-1 DMA EU (former EU24)
In 2020, customers changed their lifestyles and buying habits as a consequence of the Covid-19 pandemic. The resulting social distancing accelerated the use of e-commerce and a©racted new customer segments to digital channels. This unstoppable acceleration towards the digital transition is accompanied by increasing demands for a more customized experience. In this context, the Enel One and Unica commercial oers have been launched in Italy and Spain respectively, in order to make things easier and more transparent for customers, with greater exibility. The Enel Group has launched new digital channels and expanded the payment methods available to customers, in order to mitigate the diculties generated by the economic crisis resulting from the pandemic. Consistent with the ocial eos made to mitigate the eects of climate change, we have intensied our commitment to the energy transition, focusing on the digitalization of customer relations with digital payments and installment plans, listening to customers as pa of the continuous improvement process, the circular economy and bill discounts, inclusive oers for senior, disadvantaged, low income, socially excluded, and vulnerable customers, online sales, digitalization of documents and ling, digital bills, interactive bills, innovative and inclusive digital services, responsible consumption, and exible oers thanks to open meter.
In the various Enel Group companies, in accordance with the Code of Ethics, all contracts, communications addressed to customers and adveising messages must be:
In all the countries where the Group operates, specic customer service channels have been set up: physical, telephone and online, to keep customers constantly informed about the features of the products and services oered. Access to information has also been strengthened through the use of social media channels, such as Facebook and Twi©er, and specic apps. In order to guarantee that communication with customers is truly transparent, correct and eective, Enel undeakes to ensure that any cultural, linguistic, illiteracy or disability barriers do not aect equal access to information for customers. Services dedicated to deaf people have been developed in Spain and Peru, thanks to the collaboration with the Italian staup Pedius, which has been operating in Italy since 2018.
In Italy, in addition to the www.enel.it website, which allows customer relationships to be set up and maintained for commercial and management purposes, there is a specic Enel Energia app designed to manage utilities quickly and easily, providing access to all the data relating to bills, usage, payment status, etc. It also allows the services associated with the various supplies to be activated or changed, information to be received about new oers and promotions, while also providing access to the dedicated loyalty program. The Enel Energia website (www.enel.it) also contains a guide with audio-visual content explaining the bill and a chat function is available for deaf customers; the chat also oers an English-language service via a dedicated call-back option. In addition, sta in Enel shops are able to assist foreign customers and the contact centers oer a dedicated service to German-speaking customers in the province of Bolzano. As pa of the "Enel Social Services" program, created in collaboration with the Prime Minister's Oce, the National Electricity Service sends the bill in Braille to blind customers.
In Iberia, the www.endesa.com website provides various functions and payment methods, a section dedicated to privacy management, a chat function available on the app and innovative ways of viewing usage and invoices. The pandemic in 2020 accelerated the digitalization process, thus boosting online services. By the end of 2020, the www.endesa.com website has accumulated 2.7 million registered customers (17% more than in 2019). All commercial communications, invoices and information sent by Endesa to its customers can be received in two languages: Spanish and Catalan. The www.endesa.com website is available in Spanish, Catalan and English. The company has also implemented a channel for persons

with hearing or language disabilities using the Pedius app, which allows customers to ask questions about their bills or contract and receive personalized information. In addition, Endesa is commi©ed to overcoming any physical, social and language barriers, paicularly through digitalization. Customer contact points are all located on the ground oor to provide access for people with disabilities. Finally, Endesa has a special unit to manage relations with consumer associations and public bodies, which holds regular meetings and paicipates in various industry forums with a view to adopting increasingly appropriate measures for the continuous improvement of customer relations. In Spain, the telephone channel became a point of reference in the sector during 2020, obtaining the Excellence in Customer Relationship award (from AEERC - Spanish association of customer relationship centers) for the best digital transformation project: the integration of Watson (IBM AI) as a fuher customer inte¥ace with the contact center. The use of AI was fundamental to the provision of good service in those months during which, due to the pandemic and the lockdown, it was not possible to serve customers via other channels.
In Romania, the www.enel.ro website provides a series of on-line services to customers in Romanian and English, such as payments, suppo and even the ability to activate electronic invoicing via text message or e-mail, directly from the website. Phase 1 of the FORCE project (Focus on reinvention of the customer experience) was completed in 2020. This involved remodeling entire processes and the messages sent to customers, using a multi-channel approach in order to accelerate the response to any

problems repoed.
In Chile, new digital platforms have been developed to provide the same information and the same level of customer service, regardless of whether customers choose to be assisted in person, remotely or digitally. In 2020, Enel used social media networks, such as Facebook and Twitter, to keep customers informed about power cuts and emergencies, publishing pictures of the location, a map of the sector and the estimated downtime; this generated greater customer satisfaction, due to the transparency, immediacy and precision of the information provided. A new contact channel via WhatsApp, activated in October, has already received 16,000 visits. This readily-available channel seeks to answer questions relating to bill payments, the input of readings and the repoing of emergencies. In addition, a number of totems were installed in Macul, Peñalolén and Colina during 2020, so that customers can pay their bills immediately, by credit or debit card, without having to present any documentation, stand in line or handle cash.
In Brazil, there is a wide range of customer communication channels, with 80% of contacts made through digital channels. Using the website at www.enel.com.br, text messaging and the app, customers can access information and services while maintaining a transparent relationship with Enel. They can also communicate with Enel through the main social media (Facebook, Twi©er or Instagram), using specic applications for each, and an assistant can also be contacted via chat (WhatsApp, Messenger, DM-Direct Message or e-mail). Viual assistant Elena, a WhatsApp chatbot, is also available to interact with customers and show them the easiest way to full their requirements.
In Latin America, a new version of the Enel Clientes application has been created, with improved design and inte¥ace, in order to improve the user experience: various Enel services are available, such as repoing emergencies, paying tickets, viewing account details, branch information, meter readings and personalized messages about the supply of electricity, and making direct contact with the company. There have been more than 148,000 downloads since the new version was launched. In March, Enelbot was activated on the www.enel.cl website in order to give customers a new, readily-accessible contact channel. This service provides automated responses to balance requests, payments and the reading of income.
Enel complies with current customer privacy regulations in all the countries where it operates. We also strive to monitor all third-pay companies that may be in a position to use the personal data of customers. To this end, dedicated clauses are included in contracts with paners who use personal data to carry out specic activities, for example sales services or customer satisfaction surveys. Customer data is an expression of the individual's personality and identity, therefore it must be treated with due caution and guarantees. Enel considers personal data to be a shared and corporate asset at the same time. For this reason, we have appointed a Data Protection Ocer to guarantee full respect for the privacy of all the individuals with whom we interact. For fuher details, see the "Governance" chapter of this document.
In all the countries where Enel operates, a wide range of high energy performance products have been launched to guarantee savings in terms of both consumption and emissions.
Endesa has become established as one of the main players in the solar self-consumption market in Spain. Thanks to the experience gained and its technical knowledge, the company supports customers in enhancing the technology needed to accelerate the efficient consumption of energy, contributing to the generation of clean and renewable energy. Via its subsidiary Endesa X, the largest private self-consumption solar project in the Spanish hotels sector was launched during 2020, for Protur Hotels on the island of Majorca, with a total power rating of 2.8 MWp and an annual output of 5,000 kWh. In environmental terms, this will reduce annual emissions by 1,648 tons, which is the equivalent of planting more than 100,000 trees. Endesa X also promotes an energy management system that makes it easy to find out how to obtain significant energy savings. With appropriate monitoring and proactive management, consumption may be reduced by 10-20% while, with the replacement of obsolete equipment, energy consumption can be reduced by 15-25% in the case of water heaters and/or fridges that are more than 15 years old.
Lastly, in the context of developing electric mobility solutions and promoting their adoption, Endesa installed about 7,000 public and private charging points during 2020 and expects to increase this number in the coming years.
In Italy, in addition to the launch of Enel X Sun Plug & Play, described in the "Additional platform services" section of this chapter, an agreement was signed between Consorzio delle Banche di Credito Cooperativo (BCC) and Enel X for the supply of materials and services for the installation, management and maintenance of the electric vehicle charging points (for cars, trucks, e-bikes etc.) at BCC main offices and branches.
The "Energy saving by a heritage asset" project was also launched in Italy. Since December 2020, the traditional lighting technology at the Chiesa del Gesù church in Genoa has been replaced with advanced LEDs. This important change is the first step towards achieving more responsible usage and greater attention to increasingly sustainable behavior thanks to the new open meter services.
In Brazil, numerous energy efficiency projects have been launched to improve people's awareness of usage, promoting the replacement of obsolete electrical equipment (fridges, freezers, lighting), with a significant impact on energy consumption and on improving energy efficiency in homes, as well as public and private facilities. During 2020, more than 190,000 customers benefited from educational projects on the responsible use of energy, and mobile units equipped with a model explaining how energy is generated, transmitted and distributed visited various areas of the country. In addition to explaining the process and simulating various types of energy usage, these traveling exhibitions also made interesting multimedia activities available to visitors of all ages. Furthermore, in order to tackle and minimize the damage caused by Covid-19 in Brazil, the #Juntos-NaMesmaEnergia package of initiatives was launched, with video lessons and seminars through the Enel Shares platform, including guidelines for responsible energy consumption and safety advice relating to the electricity grid during the lockdown.
In Chile, two major projects related to "Carbon footprint" and "Energy management platform" were organized and implemented, at least in part. In collaboration with For The Planet, a local company, during 2021 Enel will adopt a new tool for quantifying and checking the carbon footprint of customers who, via the platform, will be able to monitor their greenhouse gas emissions (GHG) into the atmosphere and change their habits, in order to behave in a more sustainable manner. At a small additional cost, this program also includes carbon footprint training and suggestions and support throughout the contract period. With regard to the second project, Enel Distribución Chile, in collaboration with Enel X, has provided energy management tools to customers so that their facilities can achieve established energy efficiency objectives. This is made possible by using two systems:
Enel X, a Global Business Line of the Enel Group, is a leader in the sector of innovative and sustainable solutions that support the energy transition. Via a strategy built on four pillars – digitalization, platformization, integration with the commodity and ecosystem – Enel X offers integrated solutions for the electrification of use cases, for the more efficient consumption of energy and for adding extra value via the offer of new products and services: from public and private electric mobility, including public transport, to products for the electrification of the home, making it more energy efficient thanks to their digital content, and to the use of artificial intelligence for, but not limited to, the ever greater optimization and customization of the solutions offered to customers. Modular solutions that embrace the world of digital financial services and whose central strategy is the satisfaction of customer needs.
Each solution is able to translate the decarbonization, electrification and digitalization objectives into sustainable and advantageous actions that can support cities, businesses and individuals in an ever changing world. Enel X is organized into six Global Business Lines, representing a model that allows urban ecosystems to be connected with industrial districts and production chains, mobility needs and individuals. The scope of action of the six Business Lines is described below, together with the principal results achieved during 2020.
Enel X continues to work on the creation and development, in cities around the world, of innovative charging systems that facilitate the eective development of electric urban transpoation, providing nance, charging points, infrastructure and energy services. Numerous electric buses are already running in Chile, Colombia, Uruguay and Peru. At the bus terminals in Barcelona, in Spain, Enel X has worked with TMB, the local transpo operator, to install a rapid charging system along public routes.
In 2020, an electric bus in Santiago de Chile was equipped as a mobile laboratory to suppo the identication of Covid-19 cases. The mobile lab enter into service initially in the La Pintana district. As the rst of its kind in Chile, the vehicle is equipped with a lounge area for the transpoation of healthcare personnel (2 nurses, 1 nurse-technician and 1 administrative person), an administrative area, a health check cabin for taking samples and a storage area. When a positive case is found, the results are sent by text message to the patient and the local healthcare teams, for adequate follow up.

GW under management globally, and has helped customers to close PPA totaling 500 MW around the world, with an emphasis on North America.
(UBB). Enel's electricity infrastructure is used to promote the development of optical fiber networks and, as a wholesale infrastructure operator, the TMT (Telecommunication Media Technology) segment is offered a portfolio of neutral connectivity services. The UBB solutions provide wholesale connectivity to companies via dark fiber and circuit capacity services. In addition, FTTH (Fiber to the Home) connections are made available to residential users and SMEs, via active or passive services targeting TLC operators (over the past year, the program has been launched in Bogota, San Paolo and Buenos Aires), 4G availability is being expanded and 5G introduced with hosting and aerial connectivity services. Unet, the leading wholesaler of optical ber networks in Latin America with which Enel X has pa nered, won the 2020 Frost & Sullivan Best Practices Award for persons and organizations that have innovated strongly or made a dramatic dierence.
Enel X is guiding the energy transformation throughout the world, due to its ability to adopt and change rapidly, and act as a catalyst for innovation and change that improve constantly the lives of people.
Among the various innovation projects developed in 2020, a new, free solution known as Enel X & Here City Analytics - Mobility Map has been devised, designed, developed and adopted in record time, in response to the Covid-19 emergency. The daily mobility statistics are intended to help public administrations verify the eectiveness of their mobility restriction policies in combating Covid-19 and dene data-driven strategies for the new phase of normality. The project, implemented in partnership with Here Technologies, draws on various data sources (cars connected, maps, navigation systems, mobile apps, open data) to generate indicators of mobility at national, regional, provincial, municipal and sub-municipal level. After launching the service in Italy (April 9, 2020), Enel X & Here City Analytics - Mobility Map was also released in Spain (April 30, 2020) and Brazil (May 22, 2020). The map has been clicked on more than 3.5 million times by over 200,000 unique visitors and, via the Enel X YoUrban portal, more than 1,800 PA users are able to download additional start and destination data for movements between key cities and regions.
Due to the pandemic, demand for remote medical advice has increased and, accordingly, Enel X has developed the Smart Axistance Diabetes project which provides a 24/7 monitoring service for the management of diabetes. This project offers an integrated ecosystem of digital tools that are able to make various measurements (glycemia, ketonemia, weight, body mass index, blood pressure, heart rate) and, via the app, record the data in an on-line clinical record that can be consulted at any time, any day of the week. In addition to monitoring their own clinical parameters or speaking to doctors or specialists directly from home, customers in need can benefit from the support of a central medical team capable of providing immediate answers.
Enel X and Mastercard also won a tender promoted by the Israeli government for the creation of an innovation laboratory which aims to stimulate the development of fintech and cyber security start-ups in Israel (FinSec Lab in Be'er Sheva). For further details, see the "Innovation" chapter of this document.
The electrification of consumption in transportation, buildings and industries, and digitalization via the use of global platforms, are the critical success factors of Enel

X, which also has the sustainability/circularity of solutions as a competitive advantage. In this regard, the company has set up a specific process, known as the Enel X Boosting Program, unique in terms of completeness and innovation, that can measure the circularity of the solutions offered in order to identify possible improvements and the related roadmap. All the details are presented in the "Circular economy" chapter of this document.
In 2020, JuiceAbility won the "Award of Awards", the Italian national award for innovation. This product was launched in 2019 in order to guarantee autonomous and safe movement for the drivers of the more than 90,000 electric wheelchairs in Italy who, at present, are unable to charge their ba©eries easily if they have insucient capacity to cover the desired distance, for example between home and work. Accordingly, together with the developers of the electric wheelchair project (Avanchair), a universal adapter has been created so that persons with motor disabilities can charge their ba©eries using the Enel X infrastructure, which is available on an increasingly grassroots level.
| Activities | 2020-2022 targets | 2020 results | Status | 2021-2023 targets | Tag | SDG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gender - % of women in selection processes1 |
50% women | 44% women | OFF-PLAN | 50% women | ||
| Climate survey (%) | 100% people2 involved 87% pa icipants |
100% people2 involved 70% pa icipants |
ON-PLAN OFF-PLAN |
100% people2 involved 87% pa icipants |
||
| Pe'ormance appraisal (%) 100% people2 involved | 99% appraised | 100% people2 involved 99% appraised |
ON-PLAN | 100% people2 involved 99% appraised |
||
| Reskilling and upskilling – Promote and plan reskilling and upskilling programmes for Enel people in order to suppo the energy transition |
60% training for upskilling and reskilling |
ON-PLAN | Promote and plan reskilling and upskilling programmes for Enel people in order to suppo the energy transition |
|||
| Gender – Female managers³ and middle managers (%) |
Increase the number of female managers and middle managers |
21.6% managers 30.4% middle managers 29.4% managers and middle managers |
ON-PLAN | 22.6% managers 30.6% middle managers 29.7% managers and middle managers |
||
| Disability - Adopting a systemic approach to disability inclusion |
Appointing Focal Points in 100% of the Group Countries in which there is at least one Enel person with a disability |
Focal Point appointed in 100% of the Group Countries in which there is at least one Enel person with a disability |
ON-PLAN | • Launching a structured process to analyze the needs of Enel people with disabilities • Disseminating accessibility principles and awareness of their benets on inclusion • Launching initiatives to improve the inclusion and contribution of Enel people with disabilities |
| Industrial E Environmental Social Governance Technological |
Goals New Redened Outdated |
recruiting phase does not allow this gure to be monitored. (2) Eligible and reachable persons: those who have a permanent contract and have been in place and active for at least 3 months during the year. (3) Including female top managers. (4) Digital sustainability initiatives are aimed at promoting awareness of sustainability issues through digital technology. (5) Includes international and intercontinental travel by authorized Enel people, monitored by the integrated Travel Security system. (6) This refers to services to mitigate the risk of assault and kidnapping for colleagues working in countries with very high levels of crime. |
|---|---|---|
| 104 | 105 Sustainability Report 2020 |
(1) Selection processes involving blue collar workers and the USA perimeter are not included as local legislation protecting anti-discriminatory practices in the recruiting phase does not allow this gure to be monitored.
102-15

| Activities | 2020-2022 targets | 2020 results | Status | 2021-2023 targets | Tag | SDG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Digital skills – Promote training on digital skills among all Enel people |
100% people involved | 54% people involved | ON-PLAN | 35 new "digital sustainability" initiatives4 over the period 2021–2023 |
||
| Scholarships available for Enel people |
390 scholarships over the period 2020-2022 |
162 scholarships | ON-PLAN | 390 scholarships over the period 2021-2023 |
||
| Travel Security5 | Fu her extension of e-Travel po al's functions (itinerary planning and authorization process for all countries) |
Roll out completed in 14 Countries |
ON-PLAN | The topic of Travel Security was included when redening the target "Physical protection of people abroad" |
||
| Physical protection of people abroad6 |
Re-issue of the tender for Travel Security and Threat Intelligence services |
Tender awarded and new operational services launched |
ON-PLAN | • Preparation of the new "Travel App" • Development of risk mapping by geographic region |
||
| Evolution of the Global Security Dashboard po al (GSD) with new Travel and Local Security indicators |
• Completed the evolution for the integration and management of data on the spread of Covid-19 • It is being assessed whether to integrate additional information sources, made available by the new provider of Global Travel and Risk Analysis Services |
ON-PLAN |

As a result of the pandemic, 2020 was an exceptional year, which highlighted how the increase in the individual responsibility of our people has made it possible to guarantee operations and continuity in a crisis situation, and how the pathway embarked on cannot be left behind, but must rather mark the beginning of a new shared way of working. Over 36,000 people at Enel, of whom about 15,000 in Italy, started working remotely within a few days, experimenting with a new routine, profoundly different from how it used to be, and demonstrating great adaptability and a deep sense of responsibility. Therefore we have in 2020 carefully curated and strengthened our people empowerment processes, aimed at supporting the evolution of the organizational culture, to enable people to become more effective in the challenges they will face in the future. The evolution of the global scenario has also imposed a new, more dynamic world of work in which a different leadership model is needed: a 'soft' leadership that values people's talents, attitudes and aspirations. The characteristics of the leader of the future are empathy, generosity, the ability to inspire, to work together to affirm the company's collective aspect, and to listen in order to boost their teams' potential. In a scenario undergoing a constant transformation, the necessary skills change: upskilling and reskilling strategies assume ever greater importance to allow companies to develop talent and contribute to socially responsible approaches to accompany the transition without leaving anyone behind. We are therefore investing not only in technical tools, but also in relational skills, soft skills and proximity to our people. In a context of uncertainty and crisis, attention to caring for our people is central to us, through active engagement with individuals, different groups and organizational contexts.
The pathways of empowerment, job change, mentoring, job shadowing, coaching and open feedback favor the sharing of knowledge of people who, with a view to circular economy, are contributing their skills to help others. Despite the pandemic, to take advantage of the opportunities for digitization, it was possible to continue mentoring, coaching and shadowing, via remote sessions, to exchange experiences, acquire different points of view, expand skills and strengthen the network of relationships.
Trust, responsibility, proactivity and innovation are the key values of our Open Power approach, the basis of the creation of an open and dynamic working environment, which favors the entrepreneurial approach, risk-taking and management of discontinuity, courtesy of the increasing integration of diversity. These are the values that enable us to continue to grow while maintaining the commitments made with our people, our customers and the market.
As at December 31, 2020, the Enel workforce numbered 66,717, down by 1,536 compared to the end of 2019. This reduction is the eect of the net balance between new recruits and terminations in the year (-565 people) and the change in scope (accounting overall for -971 people), including the sale of the hydroelectric power plants in the United States, the sale of the Reftinskaya GRES plant in Russia and the acquisition of Viva Labs AS (Enel X Norway).
OUR PEOPLE 102-7 103-2 103-3 401-1 404-1 405-1 405-2
Acompany that becomes the supporting architecture of a generative culture is sustainable, open and ready to react to the challenges of the future. By realizing that the "I" is enriched by belonging to a team, we move from individualism to success.
| no. | December 31, 2020 | December 31, 2019 |
|---|---|---|
| Thermal Generation | 8,142 | 9,432 |
| Enel Green Power | 8,298 | 7,957 |
| Infrastructure & Networks | 34,332 | 34,822 |
| End-user Markets | 6,324 | 6,336 |
| Enel X | 2,989 | 2,808 |
| Services | 5,731 | 6,013 |
| Other | 901 | 885 |
| Total workforce | 66,717 | 68,253 |
| CHANGE IN WORKFORCE NUMBERS |
|---|
| Workforce as of December 31, 2020 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Change in scope | ||||
| Terminations | ||||
| 1991 VUI VILU |


| Workforce as of December 31, 2019 | 68,253 |
|---|---|
| New recruits | 3,131 |
| Terminations | -3,696 |
| Change in scope | -971 |
| Workforce as of December 31, 2020 | 66,717 |
T he community that surrounds us is betting on our value over time. This means relying not on an abstract entity but on all our colleagues, on our values, and on the ability to accept different internal and external points of view.
Can "I" empower "us"? Or must it compete with the others and win? In reality, the "us" is extremely important: seeing the world through the eyes of others removes our blind spots.
ENEL PEOPLE
22% WOMEN IN THE WORKFORCE
3,131 NEW RECRUITS
40.9 TRAINING HOURS PER EMPLOYEE
People and Organization
Since 2015, Enel has been equipped with the "Open Power"1 model of values and behaviors, expressed in a range of dierent operating aspects with the aim of engaging the paicipation of the people working at Enel, and constituting the point of reference for all people management and development processes.
The People and Organization Function denes the organizational models in line with the Group strategy and the multiannual human resources management plan. The people selection, management and development processes are governed by specic policies and procedures that apply to the global and local levels, with specic sections of the company intranet (e.g. the meritocracy section). Enel's organizational model features a matrix consisting of Business Lines/Countries and Regions, alongside the Global Service and Holding Functions, aimed at suppoing the business.
The main data and targets relating to the People and Organization Function are submi©ed to the Control and Risks Commi©ee, to the Corporate Governance and Sustainability Commi©ee and to the Board of Directors, at meetings focused on the Sustainability Plan, the Sustainability Repo, and the advancement of Enel's position in the main ESG ratings and sustainability indices. The People and Organization Innovability unit was set up within the People and Organization Function in October 2020, with responsibility for integrating sustainability into people management processes, developing people care and inclusion initiatives, disseminating Open Innovation culture and methodologies and Employer Branding. It also acts as reference point for the denition and development of the "next normal"2.
During the Covid-19 outbreak, Enel promptly intervened with measures to ensure sta§ safety and the continuity of the business. This was an action on a global scale, made possible by the sma working experience, which began in Italy as early as 2016 and was gradually extended throughout the Group, as well as by the technological transformation staed in 2014, which led to the integration of digitization into the company strategy, making Enel the rst entirely cloud-based utility service company. Over 36,000 people in the countries where the Group maintains a presence have worked in sma working mode, and a dedicated task force was set up in order to monitor the emergency, to decide on the action to be taken and to share experience across the various countries. Initiatives have also been set up to suppo the transition to the new digital scenario, promote a working culture based on autonomy, delegation and trust, and promote be©er time management, suppoing the well-being of people and their families.
As well as sma working, many exibility measures are active in the various countries. These are set out in the table below.
At the sta of the pandemic, Enel took out a global insurance policy for all employees in the event of admission to hospital due to Covid-19 infection, which has been extended to 2021. The policy, designed specically for the Group's needs, guarantees an extra allowance in the event of admission to hospital, on top of all other policies and forms of healthcare already available to employees.
In Italy, a trade union agreement was also signed to protect people in the Company who were unable to work remotely during the lockdown, establishing a solidarity system whereby all employees could choose to donate one or more days of their holidays to the colleagues in question.
To provide emotional care for people during the Covid-19 outbreak, a free listening and psychological suppo service was made available from the very beginning in the Group's main countries. Moreover, the #IWorkWellFrom-Home video-manifesto was also created and disseminated via a dedicated communication campaign, with suggestions on how to improve remote working time management, encourage inclusion and delegation, safeguard physical and relational well-being and work-life balance, and counteract hyper-connection.
A dedicated section was created on the company global intranet with useful information, advice and materials. Specically, the new section contains recommendations

| 1.0% |
|---|
| 7.4% |
| 14.7% |
| 44.7% |
| 29.7% |
| 2.5% |
(2)
Sho week in Italy, Romania, Russia; seasonal schedule in all other geographies.
for prevention and behaviors to adopt together with information on working on digital and physical working, with a specic focus on cyber frauds.
Last but not least, three sections are available on the eDucation global platform, updated on a daily basis with new content:
| Flexibility Flexibility measures measures |
Italy Italy |
Spain Spain |
Romania Romania |
Russia Russia |
Noh Noh America America |
Africa Latin Latin Asia America (1) America (1) |
Africa Asia Oceania Oceania |
Europe Europe |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pa time Pa time |
||||||||
| Sma working Sma working |
||||||||
| Telework Telework |
||||||||
| Seasonal schedule Seasonal schedule or sho week (2) or sho week (2) |
||||||||
| Time bank Time bank |
||||||||
| Flexible time Flexible time |
(1) Argentina (sma working), Brazil (sma working, time bank, exible time), Chile (sma working, telework, exible time), Colombia (sma working, telework, exible time), Peru (sma working, exible time, seasonal schedule or sho week) (1) (2) Argentina (sma working), Brazil (sma working, time bank, exible time), Chile (sma working, telework, exible time), Colombia (sma working, telework, exible time), Peru (sma working, exible time, seasonal schedule or sho week) Sho week in Italy, Romania, Russia; seasonal schedule in all other geographies.
In the current scenario of transformation and unceainty, which requires new skills, professionalism and exibility of adaptation, our ambition is to provide an experience that inspires and empowers our people. Engaging and motivating our people to reach their full potential, providing oppounities for their personal and professional development, ensures that our business continues to grow and
(1) h©ps://www.enel.com/company/stories/aicles/2018/07/sustainability-repo-2017-enel-model-open-power-seeding-energies.
(2) Next normal: our future way of working when it will be possible to return to a new dimension of "normality" at the end of the pandemic, at dierent times depending on the situation in various countries.
succeeds in its suppo of our Group strategy. The selection and recruiting, training and development processes therefore play a key role at the Company.
Despite the pandemic, over 3,100 new people were recruited in 2020, relations with universities were consolidated by means of a series of ad hoc initiatives, and the Recruiting Day project was globally expanded, based on an aptitude model aimed at suppoing the various recruitment requirements. As the pandemic progressed, new digital tools were also introduced to suppo the selection process: a pilot project introducing a video interview using a viual assistant, aicial intelligence and a global gamication experience known as Enel A©itude: a mobile gaming app with the purpose of proling people's aptitudes.
Over 2020, several – mainly digital – initiatives were developed, related to talent a¡raction and employer branding. The section of the careers site has been improved and the Enel People3 campaign has been launched, to oer an exploration of life at the Company, listening to people's opinions on innovation, sustainability and technology, but also their personal experience at the Group. As well as collecting all open positions in the various countries where the group maintains a presence, the section thus represents the enormous diversity and wealth of experience of Enel's people. These initiatives have helped to strengthen the Group's positioning on the main external acquisition platforms, via a synergistic content strategy and an integrated user experience on the enel.com/careers website. Mobility at work was also promoted in 2020, enabling people to open up to new professional challenges, facilitating the diversication of competencies, and creating increasingly horizontal proles. In Italy, 94.8% of positions were covered by internal candidates4.
The energy transition and an increasingly advanced technological evolution, platformization, aicial intelligence and a very high degree of automation are factors that open up new scenarios for the Group and for people, and determine the need for new technical and professional proles and the natural disappearance of others. Therefore, in response to the multiple stimuli of the outside world, the reskilling and upskilling programs have been boosted. The former is aimed at creating new work proles through the learning of new skills to ll positions or roles dierent from previously; the la©er, on the other hand, focused on the development of existing professional skills for an improvement in the pe¥ormance of their role.
Ongoing training of people, also known as continuous learning, is the central pillar of our education strategy. In 2020, approximately 18 million euros were spent on training5, with an average cost per employee of 277.5 euros6; 93.5% of the workforce took pa in over 2.7 million hours of training (about 41 hours per head), around 100,000 hours more than the previous year, despite the Covid-19 pandemic, thanks to some of the training courses having been redesigned to be conducted remotely. Couesy of the adaptability and versatility of the technological platforms, primarily the eDucation training platform, it became possible to build an advanced learning experience that has improved people's ability to take advantage of training using viual tools and sessions. Enel's new training paradigm aims to contribute to the empowerment of people through the expansion of their knowledge, aiming at the cross-feilization of knowledge, respect for diversity and a more active role for individuals, who can oer their personal skills. The courses on oer also included behavioral, managerial, agile and linguistic training, as well as sessions on well-being and safety, and digital skills and culture.
(6) The average value was calculated as a total of the payments made to external training service companies, divided by the total nal headcount in 2020. The indicator does not repo internal cost items, travel costs for training, cost of use, or maintenance of the LMS online platform.


Specically, the training action lines are aimed at: strengthening the dissemination of digital culture with a view to sustainability, building a train the trainer approach, disseminating increasing proximity to the business ("close to business"), internally extending new behavioral styles related to soft leadership, training on new skills and new habits (new behaviors to face up to the next normal). In terms of digital skills, in 2020 Enel involved over 50% of people in dedicated training activities, and staing from 2021 it is commi©ed to launching 20 global initiatives on digital sustainability: this ambitious goal aims to raise awareness of the oppounities oered by technology to be more sustainable and to minimize environmental impact. The dissemination of the train the trainer approach over 2021 will enhance the exchange of skills, a©itudes and internal know-how, by means of the cross-feilization of knowledge, from the most specialist to the most strategic.
In 2020, the Schools and Academies focused on programs dedicated to responding to the specic and technical training needs of the dierent business areas, in conjunction with university paners and renowned research institutes, with the suppo of the Enel Foundation. From 2016 to 2020, nine Schools and ve Academies were activated and, in the future, to face the great challenges of the Strategic Plan, the Academy model is expected to be strengthened, to meet Group requirements be©er.
The three main areas of training in 2020 were digital culture, safety and soft skills. In 2021, there will be a specific focus on the new model of gentle leadership and new habits, behaviors and professional lifestyles, related to a constantly changing context. Finally, Enel's commitment to raising awareness of anti-corruption issues remains strong: the interventions to disseminate knowledge of

ISO 37001 ceication for the Group's Italian companies, Model 231 and Global Compliance reached a course redemption level of around 80%, while the new training course on the new Enel Code of Ethics is scheduled for 2021, the document having been updated in 2020.
In 2019, the process of qualitative and quantitative performance appraisal saw the engagement of Group people at various levels in a uid process of exchange and across the all-round feedback, shifting the focus towards the organizational network rather than pursuing a hierarchical model. In paicular, 100% of eligible people7 were involved in the 2019 process and the process was completed in July 2020, with a delay due to the pandemic. For 2020 pe¥ormance appraisal, the process will be reviewed, aiming at boosting individual specicities and enhancing people's talents and inclinations.
Finally, a new campaign was launched to dene succession planning, the process whereby all Group managers are required to identify the high-potential people available to ll managerial roles in the sho term (ready) and in the medium term (pipeline). To accompany successor development, the appointing manager, the manager responsible and the People and Organization Function identify shared development actions, based on individual and professional prole, in relation to the positions for which the successors have been earmarked. Successor identication follows criteria based on meritocracy, diversity and the horizontal nature of the proles. New managers are appointed following an aptitude assessment, to explore the candidates' strengths and areas for improvement, assessing their readiness to hold a managerial position, by means of a structured process codied in specic guidelines. The assessment is designed to identify people capable of implementing Open Power values and behaviors, to meet the challenges that Enel sets itself.
(3) h©ps://www.enel.com/company/stories/aicles/2020/03/enel-people
(4) This gure takes into account the number of "job posting" winners compared to total internal positions opened and closed in 2020. The candidates considered came from Italy and abroad, while the pool of position coverage only relates to Italy
(5) Data extracted from the New Primo system, listing payments to external third paies that assisted in the sta-up of training courses.
(7) Eligible and reachable: those on a permanent contract, currently working and active for at least three months of 2019.

In light of the digitization of relationships as a result of the Covid-19 pandemic, Enel has also decided to revisit the listening channel. While most of the listening within the Group until 2018 took the form of the climate survey, which takes place every two years, in 2020 the ground was prepared to lead people towards more constant and dynamic ways of listening and direct involvement in the implementation of sustainable action plans aimed at improving organizational well-being.
In late December 2020, the "Open Listening: An interview to build our future" survey was launched. 70% of people responded to an invitation to imagine the future of work in the era of the "next normal", from remote working methods to workspaces, from new technologies and psychological/physical well-being to the new leadership models of the future. The overall level of people engagement was 93.5% (the overall engagement index result for the previous Climate Survey was 81%). To follow the results, targeted, global and specic action plans will be drawn up on the various targets.
A fuher essential element is People Business Paners, gures dedicated to listening and dialogue with people, able to grasp individual aspirations and integrate them with the organization's needs.
Finally, Enel considers internal communication a mainstay in the creation of corporate culture, people growth and the growth of the organization, stimulating and promoting the exchange of information, know-how and experience. Internal communications are also the main vector to disseminate the Enel strategy and the objectives identied for the near future.
103-2 103-3 405-1
Inclusion = Value is the paradigm that represents our approach to a©ention to people, based on the inclusion of diversity as an essential factor in the creation of sustainable value. This approach is even more relevant these days, given current circumstances where it is essential to innovate, co-create, bring out and a©ract talents and create a framework that enables everyone to express their uniqueness at all times, even in new, unprecedented situations. At Enel, inclusion means taking care of all aspects of diversity, from the visible to the most concealed, and to enhance the multiple talents of each person. It also means creating open contexts that welcome diversity and ensure everyday organizational and interpersonal conditions so that everyone's potential can be expressed freely, stimulating innovation and promoting new oppounities.
Enel's commitment to diversity and inclusion staed in 2013 with the issue of the Policy on Human Rights, followed in 2015 by the Diversity and Inclusion Policy, in parallel with adoption of the seven Women Empowerment Principles (WEP) promoted by the UN Global Compact and UN Women and in compliance with the UN Sustainable Development Goals. The Policy acts as a reference point for of the evolution of the Group's culture of caring and inclusion. Its fundamental principles of non-discrimination, equal oppounities and equal dignity for all forms of diversity, inclusion, balance between private and professional life are milestones for the development of specic initiatives that address as a priority the dimensions of gender, disability, age, nationality and the dissemination of the culture of inclusion at all levels and in all organizational contexts.
In 2019, the Workplace Harassment Policy was also published, which highlights the principle of respect for individual integrity and dignity in the workplace and addresses the issue of sexual and discrimination-related harassment. In 2020, the principles of the aforementioned policy were recalled in the Statement against harassment in the workplace, published on the Enel website. On issues related to harassment, several countries launched specic training initiatives in 2020 (Italy, USA and Canada, Peru, Colombia, Korea and Australia); in 2021, a global course will be launched for all Group countries.
The People Care and Diversity Management Holding unit, created in 2016 and merged in 2020 into the new People and Organization Innovability unit, pe¥orms governance functions globally on these issues, ensuring harmonization and monitoring of local initiatives and best practice sharing. Indicators measuring progress on diversity and inclusion are the focus of a detailed repoing process.
Enel's commitment to diversity and inclusion is also stated in public objectives in the Sustainability Plan, the progress of which is documented in the Sustainability Repo. These aim to increase the percentage of women in selection processes, the percentage of women managers and middle managers, and promote the adoption of a systemic approach to the inclusion of people with disabilities. The Sustainability Plan and Repo are analyzed by the Corporate Governance and Sustainability Commi©ee and the Control and Risk Commi©ee, and subsequently approved
The awareness of the ethical and social impoance of health in the workplace, and increasing a©entiveness to the themes of care and inclusion are the basis of Enel's choice to address the issue of people suering from chronic diseases at work, a topic often still unexplored in organizations.
Elisabe©a, who knows this situation well because she experiences it every day, has for two years led the MaCro@Work project, focusing on people with chronic illness at work, a project long covered by Enel, with the aim of making the working environment truly inclusive for everyone, regardless of living conditions.
The project is the result of an intercompany research in which Enel is involved, and of an internal survey to over 6,000 people who are directly or indirectly aected by a chronic disease. The data highlighted cultural, organizational and managerial obstacles, but also oppounities to improve the work experience. Central themes for people involved in a chronic illness are the fear of being themselves and of being judged, of not living up to professional expectations, of showing their real personalities and explaining their needs. But at the same time there is the desire to return to the normality of work as a living space for relationships and socialization, and to escape the isolation of the disease. Hiding or not properly managing fears and desires is not only to the detriment of the people, but also to the organization as a whole.
Elisabe©a's sensitivity, passion and courage are the extra "fuel" of the MaCro@Work Caring Program, which is intended to create a collaborative network around the people with chronical illness, with the aim of improving the relational well-being of the entire environment in which they live. Empathy, caring for people and cohesion form pa of a new corporate culture to create a positive, constructive and inclusive approach, without prejudice. The Caring Managers' Network is made of people and business paners who join voluntarily the project and decide to be the contact people for those with chronic diseases and their network in the workplace. In full respect of their privacy, they provide empathic listening and suppo at the delicate time when a disease arises, when many questions and practical issues need to be managed.
The Covid-19 outbreak was an accelerator of the project, as this scenario has had a profound impact on the lives of chronically ill people for example for the limited possibilities of access to care and the exponential complexity of the simplest daily activities for vulnerable people.
Elisabe©a's entrepreneurship once again made a dierence here, because she decided, in the midst of the outbreak, to take pa in the challenge launched on openinnovability.com to gather ideas aimed at ge©ing Italy going again. As one of hundreds of proposals, her idea of corporate volunteering to suppo the daily activities of "fragile" colleagues was selected and is now being implemented. The pilot has been launched, and the rst people in the Company are beneting from the services of shopping and medicines home delivery, as well as the practical handling service she designed. But this is only the rst step, and we already know that there will be many more.
CE LA FAREMO ;-)
by the Board of Directors. In late 2020, the Board of Directors approved a specic action plan associated with the Value for Disability project, with the aim of expressing the potential of people living with disabilities at company, social and economic level.
Enel has obtained numerous acknowledgements in thematic indices and in the main rankings related to diversity and inclusion which recognize the value created by Enel's sustainable and innovative business model for people, the Group and society.
The commitment and transparency in favor of gender inclusion were conrmed by Bloomberg in 2021, with the inclusion of Enel and its Spanish subsidiary Endesa in its Gender Equality Index for the second time. Enel was acknowledged for its commitment to promoting the presence of women on the Board, in managerial positions and in new hires, the contribution in terms of pay equality and work-life balance, and in the prevention of harassment.
The Company ranked eighth in the world in March 2021 and among the top 100 companies in the index, as well as being the rst company in Italy in the Gender Equality Global Repo & Ranking. This positioning followed the March 2020 inclusion in the Equileap top 20 Gender Equality rankings in Europe. The ranking analyzes 19 criteria related to gender policy, including gender balance throughout the corporate population, gender pay gap, parental leave, and the prevention of sexual harassment. In addition, in 2020 the Group ranked rst within the "Electric Utilities and Independent Power Producers" industry group of the Renitiv Diversity and Inclusion Index. The index has rewarded Enel's a©ention to gender diversity, workplace inclusion policies and human capital development. In 2020, several awards were recognized for the promotion of diversity and inclusion in the countries, including the Impulsa Talento Femenino award (Chile), the Friendly Biz Corporativo and Sello de Oro Equipares awards (Colombia), Best Workplace 2020 (Greece) and the Expocoaching Award (Spain).
At Enel, the evolution of the culture of inclusion represents a journey of various steps, represented in 2017 by the awareness of the value of all diversity, in 2018 by the impoance of the uniqueness of each person to create value for people and the business, and in 2019 by the sustainable value generated by inclusive behaviors. In 2020, when agile working methods were tested under emergency conditions, inclusion took on an ever deeper meaning. It is impoant to ensure that people are genuinely connected and to stimulate individual responsibility to act consciously to overcome the invisible barriers that technology can create under such conditions. Enel then organized a global event, "Unlock Inclusion", with the aim of stimulating reection on the behaviors that generate authentic inclusion and the conditions to ensure a context to enable these, by means of live-streamed round tables, workshops and local events. Awareness-raising initiatives on the culture of inclusion also involved about 1,500 Group managers, with an online training session on unconscious bias, with the aim of exploring how they work and which strategies can contain them.
The Company's commitment to the culture of inclusion of diversity is also expressed in the measures taken by the governing bodies with regard to their composition and in their constant a©ention to company strategies on these issues.
Boosting diversity means paying a©ention to its multiple aspects.
In terms of age, the various countries and Business Lines promote a wide range of training initiatives and the exchange of intergenerational knowledge. In 2020, over 120 juniors and 620 seniors have been involved in internal training, coaching, mentoring, shadowing initiatives and as ambassadors on specic topics. In paicular, Colombia has staed the "Talent Silver" project, Peru the "Sensei Program" and Greece the "Your voice" project. A global plan is in place to activate a tutor both to accompany the onboarding period of newly hired colleagues and to facilitate the integration of expat colleagues in their destination country.
In terms of LGBTQ+ issues, some countries (Argentina, Mexico, Chile, Greece, Romania, Germany, Australia, Italy and Peru) have organized awareness-raising, training and specic communications campaigns to reect on inclusive language, shed light on stereotypes and explore specic aspects of LGBTQ+ perspective, in paicular for IDAHOBIT Day8.
Ethnic diversity is a topic of increasing a©ention in some countries, especially in Noh America, where it is one of the priorities of the diversity management approach, also conrmed in public statements of the management against racism, staing from the candidate selection and recruiting phase. In Brazil, too, the enhancement of ethnic diversity is considered a central element and is taken into account from the selection phase onwards, with positions dedicated to people of color.
Enel continues its commitment to overcoming the gender gap and achieving pay equality with an organic approach of actions that inuence all phases of women's journey in the organization: from representation at entry level to empowerment and development in positions of responsibility, paying a©ention to various relevant moments in personal and professional life. The action plan aims to achieve equal pay by leveraging on measures that inuence the pay gap both directly and indirectly, producing a gradual increase in female representation at dierent organizational levels, thus promoting natural generational renewal and consequently equal pay.
With regard to indirect measures, there is a steady increase in women joining the Company and in positions of responsibility in the organization. Selection processes are closely monitored to ensure a fair balance of the two genders in the candidate pools, with a rising trend in the last four years (44% in 2020) and a target of 50% in 2021. A major commitment has also been made to increase the number of women in positions of responsibility. Various actions have been introduced globally, including a public goal to increase the number of women managers and middle managers and the se©ing of criteria for the fair composition of succession plans. As at late 2020, women account for about 22% of the entire Group workforce, around 22% of the managers and approximately 11% in executive positions (CEO-1) out of the total of these positions (2 out of 18).
The direct measures with an impact on the gender pay gap include internal policies addressing succession plan management and salary review processes, which take into account gender diversity as well as the allocation of a budget dedicated to ensuring equal pay for equivalent roles. In addition, the commitment to promote gender equality also resulted in se©ing a specic MBO 2021 track as pa of the MBO objectives assigned to the management of the People and Organization Function.


11% women in executive positions

(8) International Day Against Homophobia, Transphobia and Biphobia.
For the purposes of monitoring equal pay, there is a steady increase in the Equal Remuneration Ratio (ERR9) index, 83.3% in 202010, a slight increase on the 83.2% in 2019 (equivalent to 82.4% at the same exchange rates against the euro). This result is proof of all the actions taken to advance women's standing, not only in senior management, the eects of which will be fully appreciable in the medium to long term, also taking into account the generational dynamic.
In countries where the Group maintains a presence, numerous initiatives are in place to promote the empowerment of women and a leadership style that welcomes traits inspired by female models such as "Empowering Conversations" in Italy, "Women Open Power" in Peru, "Resiliencia y Mujeres en tecnología" in Argentina and the "HER Community" experience in Greece.
As far as the parental dimension is concerned, there are several ad hoc parenting programs available to the Enel workforce, women and men alike. In all Group countries, the "Parental Program" is active, aimed at promoting organizational and personal awareness of the value of parenthood and at reconciling personal and professional needs in this stage in life.
Increasing impoance is also accorded to suppoing initiatives that promote the presence of women in study and professional pathways in STEM elds (Science, Technology, Engineering & Mathematics), in conjunction with schools, universities and institutions, to overcome gender stereotypes and disseminate the impoance of the technical and scientic culture, increasingly integrated with the humanistic dimension. In paicular, STEM initiatives are aimed at female students who will be working in a few years' time in the professions of the future, to which Enel looks with interest to increase gender diversity at all organizational levels. Every year, Enel organizes in all Group countries awareness and orientation sessions, in which thousands of young women take pa. Specically, in 2020 Italy launched the "Tech Talk" cycle of digital meetings , with the paicipation of female role models from the world of science, culture and entrepreneurship, at national and international level; Brazil organized the "Mujeres de Energia Program", a volunteer initiative involving women working in technical sectors as its spokespeople. In Colombia the "Plan Semilla" aims to train and provide employment oppounities for women experiencing social hardship whereas the "USAID Program" aims to disseminate the impoance of the role of women in the energy transition. Argentina organized courses on energy transition; nally, in Spain the "Desmontando estereotipos" and "Orienta – T" projects involving Enel colleagues and psychologists from external associations have been active for several years.
Finally, all countries have held numerous events for the International Women's Day and the International Day against Violence against Women, to celebrate the value of women and equal oppounities and raise awareness of respect for rights and overcoming gender bias.
In February 2021, to conrm its commitment to these issues, Enel joined the "Equal by 30" campaign, promoted by Clean Energy Ministerial (CEM), the public initiative whereby various public and private sector organizations have commi©ed to promoting gender equality in terms of pay, leadership and oppounities in the clean energy sector by 2030. Three specic commitments have been set on raising awareness for an increasing number of girls towards STEM disciplines and professions, fair representation of women in selection sholists, and growth in the number of women in managerial positions.
Enel plays great a©ention to disabilities, of paicular signicance in Italy, which hosts 80% of the Group's around 2,200 people living with disabilities. In countries where the legislation provides for minimum quotas for the inclusion of people with disabilities, the Company is in line with the regulatory provisions. People living with disabilities are also present in some countries where there are no legislative constraints. To ensure the full inclusion of people with disabilities and in line with the approach indicated by the UN Convention, Enel provides tools, services and working methods, and promotes initiatives aimed at creating an accessible environment that promotes the independent expression of the talents and potential of everyone in the organization.
In 2019, Enel's commitment was made public by the Group signing up to the worldwide "Valuable 500" initiative, aimed at private companies commi©ed to recognizing and expressing the potential of disability at company, social and economic level. This membership resulted in 2020 in the worldwide "Value for Disability" project, aimed at dening concrete actions to promote the full inclusion of people with disabilities. The approval by the Board of Directors of the action plan resulting from the project in late
2020 was assigned as an MBO track to around 50 managers in the Functions involved. One specic stream of the project is dedicated to Enel employees, with a focus on physical and digital accessibility, paicipation in organizational life and evolution in the inclusivity of the corporate culture. As pa of the project, a specic tool to detect the organizational needs of people living with disabilities has been designed and tested, inspired by international standards. In addition, the corporate commitment to the development of the inclusive culture in the organization has been underlined with the inclusion of the accessibility topic in the Code of Ethics and the disability targets in the Sustainability Plan. The action plan resulting from the project will develop over 2021 and specically includes the validation and adoption of the questionnaire for work inclusion, the development and provision of widespread training on accessibility principles, the evolution from the perspective of inclusivity of safety, travel, recruiting and employer branding processes, and the establishment of a disability community network to facilitate the identi cation of new needs and the sharing of best practices. For fuher details on the project, see the "Sound governance" chapter of this document.
In 2020, fuher initiatives were implemented in dierent countries, with the suppo of specic organizational focal points. Among the most signicant initiatives launched in Italy, wohy of note are the "Disability and Work Research" and the "Itaca project for intellectual disabilities" aimed at developing the acquisition of digital skills for people with mental illness, the launch of the IT call center dedicated to the assistance of people who use assistive tools, and the "Auticon" project to promote work inclusion for people with autism on specialist activities in IT processes.
In Spain, a©ention has been focused on improving the integration of people with disabilities at risk of exclusion from work, moreover with the "Plan Familia", which offers a counseling service is provided to colleagues with family members living with disabilities. South American countries have set a benchmark with other companies and have launched a survey to assess the level of disability awareness among colleagues; Colombia has staed a recruitment project as pa of the local Productivity Pact; in the United States, a campaign has been promoted to highlight the needs of people living with disabilities. For the International Day of Persons with Disabilities, various events have taken place in all Group countries to raise awareness of the value of dierent skills and to overcome stereotypes.
Enel promotes organizational and personal well-being, as well as solutions to improve work-life balance and to suppo the tangible and daily needs of individuals in order to respect all the situations, including contingencies, that an individual may be required to deal with during their working life.
The non-salary benets11 awarded in the main Group countries12 cover 98% of the Enel workforce. The main suppo initiatives and the extent of their coverage of the Enel workforce are set out below.
| Non-salary beneŽts major Countries | Involvement | |
|---|---|---|
| Covid-19 insurance | 100% | |
| Pension fund membership | 81% | |
| Additional parental measures (maternity, paternity and parental leave) | 93% | |
| Parenthood suppo– initiatives | 99% | |
| Child suppo– initiatives | 83% | |
| Loans | 92% | |
| Leisure and cultural initiatives | 93% |


(9) ERR (Equal Remuneration Ratio) = xed + variable salary female managers / xed + variable salary male managers.
(10) The new calculation methodology provided for the use of nal balances for 2020 in line with the salary data used for the calculation of the ratio, unlike last year, when the average annual balances were used to calculate the indicator.
(11) Non-salary benets are the series of goods and services provided by the company in addition to monetary pay.
(12) Italy, Brazil, Spain, Argentina, Romania, Chile, Colombia, Russia, USA, Peru, Mexico.


Caring activities concern the spheres of personal, family and organizational life. A few examples are given for each eld, as carried out in the dierent countries where the Group maintains a presence.
and fathers of children a©ending primary school are granted entry permits for their children's rst day of school. Spain has a dedicated channel on the company intranet, oering a wide variety of products and services at competitive prices, as well as leisure oers and training sessions, but also providing the option to make donations to improve the living conditions of the most vulnerable. An app can also be downloaded to access various services such as private car sharing, car cleaning and repairs, a dietician and a travel agency.
› Caring in the organization. In addition to local legislation, many countries have taken measures to improve maternity, paternity and parental leave, and leave is granted for special days or in paicularly severe circumstances. In Italy, from a solidarity point of view, holidays or rest periods (solidarity holidays) can be granted to colleagues to help their loved ones with very severe personal or family circumstances. Where maternity leave is concerned, in more than half of the main countries in which Enel operates, a higher number of leave days is oered than those provided by the local legislation. In terms of salary aspects, if local legislation does not guarantee full pay during the period of maternity leave, Enel intervenes to close the gap. With regard to paternity leave, in some countries, Enel intervenes with additional measures both in terms of the number of additional days of leave and in terms of salary, covering any gaps. Finally, various measures are available for child sickness leave, for the bih of twins with measures in addition to local legislation, and also in the event of adoption, where additional measures are extended to parents of adopted children. In Spain, it is also possible to take advantage of daily exibility adapted to the temporary needs of the worker, in the form of a temporary change in working arrangements, reductions in working hours and leave for family care.
Supplementary healthcare assistance and additional pension coverage 103-2 103-3
The majority of countries where the Group maintains a presence oer supplementary health insurance policies at advantageous conditions with respect to the alternatives available on the market. In many cases, the Company provides benets related to prevention and periodic checkups (see also the "Occupational health and safety" chapter). For all Italian employees and their dependent family members, in agreement with the trade unions, Enel set up the Supplementary Healthcare Provision for Enel Group Employees (FISDE) in 1997. The Provision disburses repayments and redemptions for healthcare expenses, promotes initiatives for the disabled and individuals subject to socially challenging situations (drug addiction, alcoholism, learning diculties, psychosocial disorders) and sets up preventive medicine programs. Also in 2020, members were able to take advantage of symposia with the Italian National Council of Psychologists (CNOP) and Italian Psychoanalytic Society (SPI) for psychological suppo services. In line with the FISDE solidarity principle, former Enel employees can also continue to benet from the services oered by the Provision by continuing to pay the membership fees. Sta suppo measures also include the option of accessing xed-contribution and other pension plans, such as membership of mandatory or optional schemes and the award of various types of individual benets in services associated with post-employment benets provision. As at December 31, 2020, 80% of Enel group employees were covered by retirement plans, mandatory or voluntary schemes. The largest pension funds are in Italy (Fopen and Fondenel), Spain and Brazil.
See also the "Connected and close: sma working and care during the outbreak" section of this chapter.
As of 2016, Enel people travelling to destinations considered at risk have been provided with specic information detailing the healthcare situation and safety conditions of the countries in question. Specically, by means of the company travel reservations system, the Security Guide, Security Travel Guide and Health Guide are sent out before depaure, with any necessary updates added just before depaure or during the trip. In relation to specic risks associated with the destination, whenever necessary Enel prepares suitable protective measures (expe guides, bodyguards, etc.). To coordinate the entire process, a 24/7 supervisory function suppos sta during travel, monitors the relevant news repos and coordinates responses in the presence of situations of objective danger or emergency. The model is active in all Group Countries, guaranteeing 100% coverage of international and intercontinental travel with the integrated Travel Security system.
103-2 103-3 402-1
Enel complies with labor law in the various countries and the conventions of the International Labour Organization (ILO) concerning workers' rights (freedom of association and collective bargaining, consultation, right to strike, etc.), systematically promoting discussion between social paners and seeking an adequate level of agreement and sharing of corporate strategies by employees. In 2020, the percentage of employees covered by collective bargaining agreements was 90.8%, in line with the gure for 2019 (91.1%).
Industrial relations activities on the Group level continue to be conducted in accordance with the model laid down in the Enel Global Framework Agreement (GFA) signed in Rome in 2013 with the Italian Federations, and the global unions IndustriALL and Public Services International. The agreement is founded on the principles of human rights, labor rights and of the best and most advanced transnational industrial relation systems of the reference multinational groups and institutions on the international level, including the ILO. These principles include one on remuneration, whereby the minimum payment made to Group employees cannot be lower than the level established by the collective bargaining agreements and legislative and regulatory texts in force in the various countries, in line with the provisions of the ILO conventions. Enel guarantees that the equal pay principle is respected in all countries in which it maintains a presence, and therefore commits to guaranteeing the living wage for all its employees. It also promotes initiatives to ensure equal pay for equal work for men and women. Under this agreement, Enel acknowledges the right of its employees to set up or participate in trade union associations in order to protect their interests. It also awards them the right to be represented, in the various generation units, by trade union organizations and other forms of representation elected in compliance with the legislation and practices in force in the countries concerned. Enel acknowledges the value of collective bargaining as a tool to determine the contractual conditions of its employees and to regulate relations between company management and trade unions. Enel complies with the principle of trade union independence and does not inte¥ere in any way with the organization of representation, allowing its employee representatives access to the workplaces in order to communicate with their members, in compliance with the law and the industrial relations systems in force in each country. Enel provides adequate information to its employees and to the trade union organizations that represent them, in order to facilitate collective bargaining. Enel therefore adheres to strict neutrality with regard to workers' decisions whether to join a trade union and/or the choice of the trade union by which to be represented; it recognizes as interlocutors the trade union representative of the workers in the Company, in compliance with national legislation. In the event of a discrepancy between local and international standards, Enel strives to apply the provisions that best protect workers' rights. The GFA agreement is also acknowledged and acclaimed as best practice among European and non-EU multinationals. Enel provides its people with a full range of information concerning collective labor agreements and trade union agreements, in accordance with current legislation, over the company intranet. In the event of organizational changes, Enel provides prompt information as indicated in the table below.
| Country | Minimum Period | Legal Provisions/Collective Agreements |
|---|---|---|
| Italy | 25 days | Legal provisions |
| Spain and Po"ugal |
30 days | Guarantee Framework Agreement of Endesa SA and subsidiaries in Spain (September 12, 2007) |
| Russia | 60 days | Legal provisions |
| Romania | Obligation to inform and consult worker representatives on business developments and to inform them periodically about the Company's economic situation. For group layo˜s, at least 30 days' notice for the trade union organizations and 20 days' notice for workers. The maximum period for the group layo˜ procedure is 90 days |
Legal provisions Collective agreement |
| Argentina | Obligation to periodically update worker representatives; traditionally the notice period for changes in working hours, employee roles or place of work is 48 hours, although there is no specic regulation |
- |
| Brazil | Obligation to issue a "timely" notice | - |
| Colombia | Neither the law nor collective bargaining provide for a min imum notice period in the event of organizational changes |
- |
| Peru | Neither the law nor collective bargaining provide for a min imum notice period in the event of organizational changes |
- |
| Chile | Neither the law nor collective bargaining provide for a min imum notice period in the event of organizational changes |
- |


(1) Cumulative gures since 2015.
122 New Goals Industrial Environmental Social Governance Technological Redened Outdated E
| 1 2 At a Glance |
3 Our ESG peormance Trend Topic |
4 | Appendix | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Priorities | Plan | SDG NO POVERTY ZERO HUNGER |
CLIMATE ACTION |
QUALITY EDUCATION |
||
| Economic and nancial F value creation G Engaging local communities |
Local and global communities | GENDER AFFORDABLE AND CLEAN ENERGY EQUALITY REDUCING PARTNERSHIPS INEQUALITY FOR GOALS |
INDUSTRY, INNOVATION AND INFRASTRUCTURE |
|||
| Target | ||||||
| Activities | 2020-2022 targets | 2020 results | Status | 2021-2023 targets | Tag | SDG |
| Inclusive and equitable quality education |
2.5 mil beneficiaries by 20301 |
2.3 mil beneficiaries (2015-2020) |
ON-PLAN | 5.0 mil beneficiaries by 20301 |
||
| A"ordable, reliable, sustainable and modern energy |
10.0 mil beneficiaries by 20301 |
9.8 mil beneficiaries (2015-2020) |
ON-PLAN | 20.0 mil beneficiaries by 20301 |
||
| Sustained, inclusive and sustainable economic growth |
8.0 mil beneficiaries by 20301 |
3.0 mil beneficiaries (2015-2020) |
ON-PLAN | 8.0 mil beneficiaries by 20301 |
||
| Strengthening of strategic partnerships and promotion of operational partnerships |
1,000 partnerships launched |
ON-PLAN | Strengthening and promoting operational pa‡nerships |
|||
| Implementation of new projects in support of the communities in which Enel operates in order to create shared value (CSV) |
2,141 projects | ON-PLAN | Implementation of new projects in support of the communities in which Enel operates in order to create shared value (CSV) |
|||
| Dissemination of the CSV model in operating assets 1,425 total CSV | applications | ON-PLAN | Dissemination of the CSV model in operating assets |
102-15
We bring energy to whoever is giving theirs and we suppo the more vulnerable groups during the Covid-19 pandemic
The eects of the Covid-19 pandemic have amplied vulnerabilities and also the inequality within the various communities we operate among. Thanks to the strong roots enmeshed in the territory, we have been able to identify immediate measures for suppoing urgent medical and socio-economic needs in the poor countries where Enel operates, from Europe to Latin America, Asia to Africa and Australia. More specically, around 450 sustainability projects have been developed in two areas of intervention:
Here are some examples of projects:
› Allacciamo le energie [Connecting energies] (Italy), by which Enel has connected to the electricity grid or increased the power of public-health facilities and areas, including temporarily, to tackle the medical emergency. From eld hospitals, drive-in screening stations, to new care spaces placed adjacent to medical facilities or at trade fairs and hotels, tens of facilities throughout Italy have beneted from free connection to the electricity grid. The project was launched in March 2020 for the completion of the eld hospital in Crema, a 35-bed medical facility constructed by the Italian army, enabling the supply of 400 kW to the installation for all the required equipment in just a few hours;
› Home meal deliveries (Brazil), where Enel X, in collaboration with Enel Distribuição São Paulo and Riba, an electric transpo company, developed a home meal delivery system for the community of Paraisópolis in the southern pa of São Paulo. By providing electric scooters and hiring delivery riders, logistics costs for the distribution of meals produced within the same community, delivered to residents in the area to suppo them during the pandemic, have been reduced. The initiative forms pa of the Brazilian #Juntos-NaMesmaEnergia [Together with the same energy] campaign, a series of initiatives focused on prevention and action against Covid-19 in Brazil.
Other projects are described within this chapter.
Responsible community relations constitute a pillar of Enel's strategy. Constantly and proactively considering the needs and priorities of society makes it possible to accept new challenges and redene an increasingly competitive business model, developing new creating shared value strategies and innovating in processes, also through scalable solutions.
In 2020, with around 2,100 projects and more than 8 million beneciaries1 in the various countries where we are present, we made a tangible contribution to the development and social and economic growth of local areas: from the expansion of infrastructure to education and training programs, from initiatives aimed at social inclusion to projects designed to suppo cultural and economic activities. Specic initiatives were intended to promote access to energy, tackle energy povey and promote social inclusion for the weaker categories of the population, by adopting new technologies and approaches of the circular economy.
The essential lever to carry out these projects is the recourse to around 1,000 panerships with non-prot organizations, social enterprises, sta-ups and institutions operating locally and internationally that promote development of the territory through innovative and tailored interventions.
We are continually seeking social innovation ideas and solutions via the Open Innovability® ecosystem, based on openness and sharing (for more details, please see the "Innovation" chapter of this document).
From an operational viewpoint, knowledge of specic local requirements and continually listening to the needs of stakeholders are fundamental elements for mapping as comprehensively as possible the potential positive, but also negative impacts that the Group's activity has on the communities where our plants operate. This approach has also allowed us to develop robust actions for the new context associated with the Covid-19 pandemic, given the changed conditions caused by restrictions such as social distancing and restricted movement.
With a view to mitigating the risk associated with relationships with communities and, more generally, human rights, we carry a specic analysis both for the individual country and for individual assets, continually to monitor the potential critical issues and respond rapidly as needed. This conguration will be integrated fuher during 2021 by the implementation of specic projects for assessing human rights impacts in the individual assets (for more detail, please see the "Sound governance" chapter of this document).
There are more than 1 billion people in the world living with disabilities, concentrated for the most pa in low income countries: it is the largest minority in the world (15% of the global population). Levels of paicipation in social and economic life, and also access to education and care are signicantly less than for the rest of the population. For this reason we wanted to launch local projects to promote an increase of skills, employability and entrepreneurship of disabled people. Here are some examples of projects:
› "Balneario inclusivo" [Inclusive swimming] (Chile). We created an inclusive beach by providing two amphibian chairs and other items that have allowed people with disabilities, who have never been able to go into the sea, to enjoy swimming fully. Around 600 direct beneciaries and more than 3 thousand indirect ones, given that the beach welcomed all disabled
› "Cocina inclusiva" [Inclusive cooking] (Chile). Substantive suppo for the development of entrepreneurship and skills of disabled people via the realization of an infrastructure within a school complex, which will act as a cooking laboratory and where people will be able to learn advanced culinary techniques. This training will help the young students in their quest for work. In addition, another success factor has been the panership developed with the Association of industrial com-


› "Me¡iamo su casa!" [Let's make a home!] (Italy). An initiative launched by Enel Cuore in 2017, targeting teiary sector associations, in panership with other entities, with the aim of promoting home autonomy of young adults with intellectual and social disabilities. In selecting the numerous proposals received in response to the call, Enel Cuore gave priority to those interventions that were able to promote innovative and shared forms of living (exible residency, co-housing, shared condominiums) and especially to guarantee people with disabilities a path of employment and work integrated with the community. We have suppoed a total of seven projects, each one with elements of innovation, transferability and sustainability, whose value is measured by the degree to which they change the life of people and their communities; › "Força na Peruca" [Strength in the wig] (Brazil). This expression refers to the possibility of mustering unknown strength from within, when all seems to have failed. The program actually oers professional training for entrepreneurship and the creation of wigs for people who live in socially vulnerable areas. As well as promoting female-positive economic development, the project also intends to promote well-being, with the donation of all 200 wigs produced during the course to
102-42 102-43 102-44 103-2 103-3 411-1 413-1
2,100
SUSTAINABILITY PROJECTS
8 million
BENEFICIARIES
1,425
CREATING SHARED VALUE APPLICATIONS
1,000
PARTNERSHIPS
The trust in using electricity thanks to an efficient and reliable service combined to the expansion of our networks are the enabling factors to support the customers' electrification choice.
E nabling access to green electricity in urban, suburban and rural areas, thanks to an open and participatory grid, is the key to sustainable development that is in line with the energy transition.
Ensuring the best electric service accessible to everyone is the challenge we face in order to improve the living conditions of the communities where we operate.
Global Infrastructure & Networks
(1) Beneciaries are the people in whose favor the project was carried out. Enel considers only the direct beneciaries for the current year. The number of beneciaries considers the activities and projects carried out in all the areas in which the Group operates. Solely within the NFS perimeter (excluding companies consolidated using the equity method, foundations, Group non-prot organizations and companies to which the Build, Sell and Operate, or BSO mechanism has been applied), the number of beneciaries is 0.5 million for SDG 4 (0.3 million in 2019), 1.8 million for SDG 7 (1.6 million in 2019) and 0.8 million for SDG 8 (0.2 million in 2019).
The model's functioning is regulated by a specic policy (no. 211 "CSV Process denition and management") and by an operating instruction (no. 1768 "Project Pofolio Management System"), which incorporates the operation of a dedicated digitized platform (Project Pofolio Management System).
Denition and dissemination of guidelines on the use of CSV applications, the preparation and assessment of the sustainability projects, the management of the projects on a Group level and the dissemination of best practices in the countries we operate in are guaranteed by the Holding's Innovability® organizational structure and by the relative sustainability structures in the various countries of operation. Each country and each Business Line adapts the global policy and the procedures for application of the CSV model on a local level, based on the specic aspects of business and the context.
In 2020, 1,425 applications of the CSV model2 have been realized in the various phases of the value chain.
The signicant results achieved to date were made possible thanks to a "Creating Shared Value - CSV" strategy and model, in which success of the company is directly related to the prosperity of the communities where it operates. The strategy stands on three primary pillars: Company, identication of potential risks/oppounities Denition of the CSV Plan
Within the Engineering and Construction phase and thanks to the best practices on circular economy and sustainability in the use of resources for renewable energy generation, we have dened a "sustainable construction site" model. This has the aim of minimizing impacts (for example by installing photovoltaic solar panels to meet pa of the energy demand, the adoption of measures for saving water, including the installation of water tanks and rainwater collection systems, the use of electric vehicles for transferring workers from the city to the construction site and for travel within the construction site) and for promoting the oppounity for development via the involvement of local manpower, at the same time guaranteeing be©er operating eciency and respect for the region. The primary indicators dened for the application of the model and relating to the various Business Lines:
Since 2015 we have launched a new way of managing relationships with communities via a CSV model that integrates socio-environmental factors within business processes and throughout the entire value chain, with special reference to operations of business development, engineering and construction and procurement, in addition to management and maintenance of assets. A model whose primary phases are described in the infographic below, and that describes a wide range of socio-economic, environmental and cultural data. In paicular, a materiality analysis is provided to correlate the priorities of stakeholders with those of the Group in order to identify and meet common needs. necessary with the collaboration of strategic paners Monitoring, evaluating and repoing Monitoring of the process, measurement of the impacts and repoing of the key indicators
› reduction of environmental impacts (emissions, water
use, waste management, saving natural resources, biodiversity);
M
o
nitoring,

||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| || ||
||||
||||
|| || ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
the CSV Plan
Execution of of stakeholders
Identication
the CSV Plan
Denition of Analys
and
of
analysis
Context
eva
ul ating
d
re
p
o
ing Identication of key factors relating to the social, economic and environmental aspects of the communities
Mapping and weighting of the main stakeholders and recording their needs
Identication of priority issues for stakeholders and for the Company, identication of potential risks/oppounities
Denition of an action plan for the creation of shared value (CSV) in line with the priority issues which emerged with impact analyses

Implementation of actions dened in the CSV Plan, if necessary with the collaboration of strategic paners
Monitoring of the process, measurement of the impacts and repoing of the key indicators
Context analysis
Identication of key factors relating to the social, economic and environmental aspects
of the communities
Identication of stakeholders
their needs
Analysis of the priorities
(1) The total value includes 2 CSV applications related to the Market area.
| CSV APPLICATIONS | ||
|---|---|---|
| Business Development |
23 | 94 |
| Engineering & Construction |
4 | 66 |
| Operation & Maintenance |

(2) An application is interpreted as the use of at least one CSV instrument in relation to an asset, in any phase of the value chain and in any Business Line. The CSV applications in the BD phase include applications regarding BD oppounities (also at the beginning phases) and business projects output from the pipeline. They can also relate to assets in O&M in the case of modernizing projects or decommissioning activities. The CSV applications in the E&C phase can refer to assets passed to the O&M phase at the end of the year. The number of CSV applications in Infrastructure & Networks (I&N) may refer to the concession area, but also areas identied by municipalities and substations. For the NFS perimeter alone (i.e. excluding companies consolidated using the equity method, foundations and non-prot organizations of the Group, and the companies for which the BSO - Build, Sell and Operate mechanism was applied) the number of CSV applications for 2020 amounts to 1,396 (compared to 1,318 in 2019).
The sustainability of the strategy is also conrmed by the progress achieved in terms of the Group's contribution to achieving the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDG), with paicular reference to projects for:
› promoting sustained, lasting, inclusive and sustainable economic growth (SDG 8) with 3 million beneciaries5.
(4) Cumulative data from 2015-2020 on the total number of beneciaries of SDG 7 to date.

We make a substantive contribution to the development and social and economic growth of the territories and communities where we operate with varying types of intervention, ranging from the expansion of infrastructure to education and training programs, from initiatives targeting social inclusion initiatives to projects suppoing local cultural life. The LBG (London Benchmarking Group) method, dened by a work group in which more than 100 international companies paicipate, identies a measurement model that makes it possible to clearly determine and classify the Company's contribution towards the development of the communities where it is present.
In paicular, according to the LBG standard, the expense for the contributions to the communities can be divided as follows:
In 2020, we contributed more than 104 million euros6 to the communities we operate in.
In 2020, commercial initiatives and community investments were lower than in 2019 especially in Europe and Latin America due to Covid, which impacted events and activities that were planned but not realized. Spending on good causes however increased strongly compared to 2019, especially in Spain due to the grants for the purchase of medical equipment together with donations to public and private institutions working to tackle the pandemic.
The results achieved have allowed us to review our goals for 2030, doubling the number of people that may benet from projects that ensure quality education (SDG 4: target of 5 million beneciaries for 2030) and access to energy (SDG 7: target of 20 million beneciaries for 2030). We have also conrmed the commitment to initiatives for promoting lasting, inclusive and sustainable economic growth (SDG 8: target of 8 million beneciaries for 2030).


(1) The number of beneciaries takes into account activities and projects carried out in all areas in which the Group operates. For the NFS perimeter alone (excluding companies consolidated using the equity method, foundations, Group non-prot organizations and companies to which the Build, Sell and Operate - BSO mechanism has been applied), the number of beneciaries is 0.5 million for SDG 4 (0.3 million in 2019), 1.8 million for SDG 7 (1.6 million in 2019) and 0.8 million for SDG 8 (0.2 million in 2019).
(3) Cumulative data from 2015-2020 on the total number of beneciaries of SDG 4 to date.
(6) This amount relates to:
the development of websites, e-commerce platforms and digitization of customer relationships. The project forms an instrument for social and economic integration and is aimed in paicular at the groups considered the most vulnerable: young people up to 35 years, small entrepreneurs in the 55 to 65 age group, women, immigrants, ethnic minorities and people with disabilities.
› Help for families to overcome the digital divide (Spain): the interruption of in-person education during the pandemic has given rise to numerous problems associated with the digital divide, causing diculties especially among low-income families who have no PC or tablet or Internet connection. Via a series of actions, Endesa is commi©ed to rebalancing the digital divide among children and young people of various economic backgrounds, with the aim of avoiding a real educational crisis in the areas most at risk, such as the peripheries of large cities or rural areas. The plan envisages education in digital skills for teachers and students, as well as the donation of more than 5 thousand computers and computer devices to students belonging to families in vulnerable situations.

The Enel Cuore [Enel Hea] non-prot organization born in 2003 out of our wish to express our commitment to social solidarity in a transparent way, to be close to people and the community with genuine heafelt energy. Thanks to the Open Power approach, the non-prot is increasingly involved in social issues by suppoing numerous activities of teiary sector organizations in Italy. As in previous years, during 2020, the orientation towards large-impact projects for the community's children and young people, but also adults, especially in the poorer socio-economic conditions, addressed suppo for education, parenthood and work.
However in 2020, to meet the health care needs and suppo our country in the Covid-19 pandemic, Enel Cuore concentrated eos on projects for suppoing frontline organizations involved in tackling the emergency, with a contribution of 23 million euros for Civil Protection Depament, medical facilities, non-prot organizations, local administrations throughout the country. An initial pa of the fund was designated for the more urgent interventions in Lombardy, such as the Mutual Rescue Fund established by the Municipality of Milan, San Raaele hospital and Humanitas Gavazzeni hospital, Bergamo. The commitment of Enel Cuore was then extended to the other Italian regions: from Liguria to Sicily, Emilia-Romagna to Apulia. Grants enabled new intensive care beds to be set up, pre-triage facilities for admi©ing patients, purchases of medical equipment and personal protection equipment for the doctors and nurses.
Among the main projects was the crowdfunded "5 non-prot organizations" initiative, a collection of internal funds that also involved the senior management and the Boards of Directors, and which concluded with more than 1 million euros pledged, an amount that was then doubled by Enel Cuore. More than 2 million euros destined for ve teiary sector associations for the fullment of projects to protect the weaker population groups. The beneciary associations:

of the distribution network of the Foundation's food goods, especially in the central-southern pa of the country, by hiring new people, acquiring temporary storage, personal protection equipment, activating ordinary and extraordinary cleaning works and purchasing fuel for the vehicles to transpo the food;
For more information please refer to www.enelcuore.it.
Solar energy with dual-use means using the land for generating solar energy and at the same time applying practices to preserve the natural capital and oer services to the ecosystem. The Aurora Park does not just generate energy, but plays an essential role for pollinators, wild fauna and in improving water quality. Ceain studies have demonstrated that climate change has contributed to the reduction of the bee population1 , these fundamental pollinators help maintain our ecosystem. At Aurora Park, our approach with a secondary aim, of defending pollinators, is helping us to resolve both problems. We generate energy without harmful emissions and provide a favorable habitat for bees. The beekeeping cooperatives found beyond the fence, but still on Enel land, are exploiting the local ora and ecosystem at the Aurora site to help the populations of bees, with the aim of enhancing the productivity of growers of the surrounding agricultural businesses. In addition, these generate a sweet product that consumers can enjoy: Aurora honey is being sold to the food and drinks industry and is being used in products such as snacks and even beer.
(1) h©ps://science.sciencemag.org/content/367/6478/685.
DMA EU (former EU23)
Access to energy represents a challenge and a primary need as stated by the United Nations SDG 7, which aims to provide everyone with access to economic, reliable, sustainable and modern energy systems. The Energy Progress Repo provides the international community with a global dashboard for recording progress toward this sustainable development goal. The 2020 repo7 in paicular highlights that 789 million people in 2018 did not have access to electricity, a gure which is down compared to the 1.2 billion of 2010.
With a constant and proactive approach to the needs of society, we aim to develop sustainable business models that can drive change and guarantee not only access to clean energy, but also sustainable development of communities. Modern energy services and connectivity represent the keys for changing the quality of life of people, transforming communities into ever more connected spaces. For example, to achieve this goal we shared the Wi-Fi of our electricity power plants located in rural areas with the adjacent communities and we promoted the development of digital incubators for the development of new services. In all countries where we operate, we are close to people and suppo in paicular the most vulnerable sections of the population, both through initiatives, usually inspired by the government, that provide economic suppo in facing energy costs, and through projects in developing countries that promote access to energy by a greater number of persons.
This commitment is conrmed in the 2021-2023 Strategic Plan through the denition of specic objectives, including an increase in renewable sources, energy e ciency initiatives, the development of sustainable and circular products and services, engaging local communities through a creating shared value model (please see the section, "Value for territories" in this chapter and the "At a Glance" chapter).
The Strategic Plan, the Sustainability Plan that describes in detail the goals and commitments from an ESG point of view, including access to energy and the related nancial and non-nancial repoing are analyzed and monitored by the Board of Directors, by means of the Corporate Governance and Sustainability Commi©ee and the Control and Risk Commi©ee (see the Repo on Corporate Governance, available at www.enel.com). Top management is engaged on a daily basis in realizing these strategic objectives by contributing towards suppoing the global challenge of guaranteeing access to energy. In line with Enel's sustainable business model, each Business Line/country promotes specic initiatives for its area of responsibility, such as the development of renewable assets in mature countries and in developing countries (Global Power Generation Business Line), energy e ciency, responsible consumption and oers dedicated to vulnerable segments (Infrastructure and Networks, Enel X, Market-Countries). To suppo top management, each country is responsible for managing relationships with institutional bodies, regulatory authorities on a national, regional and local level, and associations for promoting the development of solutions for access to energy according to dierent needs. The Innovability® Function, both on a holding level and on a Business Line/country level, also promotes the dissemination of a shared value model. It suppos innovative solutions that can promote access to energy in remote areas with limited access to electricity.
We are commi©ed to promoting access to electricity in developing countries via initiatives and projects for improving the living conditions of communities and the availability of energy. A commitment that does not involve only the supply of electricity, but also the possibility of making innovative and clean energy generation technologies available to populations with a reduced environmental impact and at competitive prices. For example, approximately 1,700 MW of renewable generation was commissioned in Latin America in 2020, increasing the total renewable capacity to more than 17,500 MW. In Africa, Enel Green Power is currently the main private operator in the renewable sector in terms of installed capacity (more than 900 MW in operation and almost 900 MW under construction), with a presence in dierent countries, including South Africa, Zambia and Morocco. In Asia, the Group is present in India through its subsidiary BLP Ener-

gy, one of the country's main renewable energy companies, which owns and manages 172 MW of wind capacity, producing approximately 240 GWh a year in Gujarat and Maharashtra. In addition, as pa of rural electrication initiatives, in the state of Goiás in Brazil in 2020 connections were made to around 100 isolated communities using o grid solutions, under a plan that will continue into 2021. In paicular, to facilitate the installation of the technical solution identied and for it to correspond with the needs of communities, in-eld survey involving around 1,100 potential users was launched to gain a be©er understanding of the territory and the needs of local communities. The goal was to improve access to energy and at the same time contribute to the development of communities via training projects for the creation of new skills, to expand tourism into the area, promoting social cohesion.
Some examples are provided below of initiatives that Enel is adopting in developing countries to suppo access to energy and that were promoted by the various Business Lines.
› Plan Semilla (Colombia): the project oers oppounities for professional growth to young people from vulnerable areas around Codensa, via integral training within the electricity industry, especially in the area of distribution. The endeavor may thus count on the creation of a pool of young people trained on techniques, safety and quality in line with the Group's standards, who we hope we can call on when we and our contractors need them, thereby avoiding unnecessary cost for selection and training. Since its inauguration the project has trained more than 400 young people in a 15-month training course. Plan Semilla has also favored the inclusion of young women within groups for equitable training, in industries such as electricity, typically characterized by a higher male predominance, going from 1% in the rst edition of the project to more than 30% now.
(7) https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/handle/10986/33822#:~:text=Tracking%20SDG7%3A%20The%20Energy%20Progress,share%20 of%20renewable%20energy%2C%20and.
es were reduced signicantly, training seminars for customers were organized on issues such as energy eciency and electrical safety, two local people were hired as consultants for informing new customers of the new benets they can access via the pofolio of product and services Enel X oers.
Even if the system for access to energy is guaranteed in developed countries, following the serious global economic crises that aected low-income families in this country in paicular, there are consumers who nd it dif cult to pay their energy costs. Even if governments have the primary responsibility of guaranteeing sustainable, safe and economic access to basic energy services, the electric sector can contribute towards promoting sustainable social-economic development. We have always been commi©ed to collaborating with governments to combat energy povey and promote access to energy for the vulnerable population of developed countries. Over recent years, we have adopted dierent forms of suppo, often through existing government initiatives, in order to reduce the cost of the energy bill for vulnerable customers in developed markets, such as Italy, Spain and Romania (see also the section "Care of vulnerable customers" in the chapter "Electrication, digital and platforms"). Various campaigns and activities were also organized to provide the population living in vulnerable conditions with advice about responsible energy consumption.
Here are some examples of the projects carried out in Spain:
tari§ optimization, currently in online mode, which in 2020 saw the paicipation of 136 institutions which provided advice to around 22 thousand people who struggle to pay their energy bills. The course received an assessment of 4.5/5;
› project Confía (Spain): agile project for improving management of vulnerable customers via the Blockchain. This pioneering project is an example of open innovation where Endesa, the Municipality of Malaga, the University of Malaga, two software suppliers and Alastria collaborated to improve coordination between the public administrations involved, social services and energy companies. This innovative management system allows social services to be able to identify situations of diculty in real time involving vulnerable customers, in order to give them immediate suppo to address the payment of electricity and gas supplies, ensuring that they can benet from the suppo prescribed by law. This project unites the Endesa social commitment, technological innovation and the continual quest for process eciency.
102-42 102-43 102-44 103-2 103-3 413-2 DMA EU (former EU19) DMA EU (former EU20) EU22
A presence in such a vast geographic perimeter of countries and regions necessarily calls for the evaluation of very dierent scenarios and radical knowledge of each area and the needs of the various stakeholders in order to identify targeted solutions. Each infrastructure project is discussed therefore, with evaluations by the community and involved stakeholders, which could involve criticism or paial acceptance in some cases, especially when related to rese©lement activities. In these la©er cases, the Group may be exposed to reputational risks, also in relation to their interaction with local suppliers, as well as operational risks related to delays in executing projects or completing them, with possible repercussions on the supply chain. The involvement of the concerned paies in the processes for the planning and development of the infrastructure


is of fundamental impoance, especially if the construction of a new plant involves the rese©lement of a pa of the resident population in the surrounding areas.
Rese©lement management must involve the population and the concerned persons as well as a close evaluation of the psychological and social problems that are possible on an individual and collective level. The approach when selecting potential sites is therefore to minimize as far as possible the need to move the population. This is done by analyzing the economic, political, cultural and social-demographic aspects, including an analysis of the daily life of the communities that live in the area of inuence, the distribution of the population, the organizational forms, the employment and remuneration levels. In the cases in which rese©lement is conrmed, the project is carried out in compliance with applicable international standards, considering possible impacts on the dierent forms of physical, human, economic, environmental and cultural capital of the concerned populations. Any rese©lement projects will be carried out in compliance with the applicable legislation of the involved country, including the local regulations that specify the conditions for rese©lement and the methods for calculating the related economic compensation. Enel's sensitivity to this issue is also addressed in the Group Policy on Human Rights (see chapter "Sound governance") and the processes for interacting with the communities are inspired by a model for shared creation of value. A description is provided below of the most signicant cases in progress related to plants constructed in the past but that present residual areas of criticality, the positive and/ or negative impacts (actual or 'feared') on the territory and the way in which the concerned Group companies are pro-
moting a proactive dialogue to reach solutions that are as shared as possible..
The Bocamina II plant is a 350 MW coal-red thermoelectric power plant whose construction staed in 2007 in the municipality of Coronel, Region of Bío Bío, in Chile. The plant is pa of the Bocamina coal-red thermoelectric power station, whose rst unit, 128 MW, was built in the 60s and put in operation in the 1970. The second unit was built in an area next to the rst, with approximately 1,300 families living nearby. The construction of the second coal-red generation unit implied the relocation of the families living nearby to the site intended for the plant. The method for relocating families has been completely reviewed since 2017 and aligned with the main applicable international standards, including standard IFC no. 5 "Land Acquisition and Involuntary Rese©lement". We staed a detailed analysis process in order to identify the suitable actions to implement in order to improve relationships with the local community. This analysis was carried out also with the suppo of a company with considerable experience in this topic, Environmental Resources Management, and an action plan was prepared based on the results. The new neighborhoods had social, spos and religious infrastructure which were not initially considered for the process, enabling community values to be recovered.
To date, all families involved in the relocation process have been consulted and involved, with more than 1,200 agree-
ments concluded out of a total of 1,370. The remaining families decided not to go along with the relocation and stayed in the original place. The relocation process was formally closed in August 2020.
In a press release on 4 January 2021, we announced that via the subsidiary Enel Generación Chile SA, we disconnected the electricity grid and terminated the group I activity of the coal-red plant in Bocamina, in the municipality of Coronel in Chile. Group I was disconnected from the electricity grid three years in advance of the date identied in the Chilean National Decarbonization Plan. This goal, linked to the closure of the Tarapacá coal-red plant, achieved on 31 December 2019, and the last Enel coal plant in Chile, Bocamina group II, scheduled for May 2022, marks progress in the decarbonization of the Enel generation mix in the country.
The process for a true transition staed in Coronel by Enel from 2017, allowed us to redesign relationships with the communities and focus on local development, respect and transparency between the paies. During the course of the year, various actions were implemented in favor of the communities, always based on the criteria of accountability, transparency, measurement and equity of solutions, in order to create shared value over the long term. Below are some examples:
("My neighborhood, our neighborhood") program, which includes implementation of requalication projects for new and pre-existing areas aected by the plant. As well as the completion of a spos center in the community of Hueos Familiares and a social center eco-built by the women of Cerro Obligado, the construction was completed of a "Sense park", which oers an experience in the indigenous greenery and vegetation. From 2020 the works were initiated for fuher social sites in three neighborhoods of Coronel as pa of the plan for the recovery of common spaces for the relocated communities;
Also in 2019, Enel Generación Chile dened a method of paicipation in special loans with the shing community for reinforcing traditional shing. Last year two funds were launched relating to 2019 and 2020, allowing more than 580 small entrepreneurs to access the resources for improving their operations.
Again to reinforce the local entrepreneurial fabric, Enel Generación Chile has since 2016 made available to the small enterprises of Coronel, an annual fund which 150 businesses have been able to access for improving their operations. The latest edition of the fund will be fullled in 2021.
In order to promote relations, dialog and transparency, the Casa Abiea Coronel has been available for some years. It is a place of reference for the entire community, in line with Enel's Open Power vision, where it is possible to speak openly with the Company, receive information, raise any complaints and evaluate solutions with a group

of available expes. The criteria at the basis are transparency, fairness and non-discrimination. Via the development of a system for managing community complaints and/or requests according to the criteria of transparency and equity, it has been possible to resolve almost 600 cases successfully thanks to a multifunctional team which includes legal expes, relocation and sustainability consultants, and that ensures veriability, transparency and equity of the solutions.
Fuher information can be found in the Enel Chile and Enel Generación Chile Sustainability Repo (www.enel.cl; www.enelgeneracion.cl).
Enel Generación Chile manages three hydroelectric power plants in the area of Alto Bío Bío (Ralco, Pangue and Palmucho), which is an area with the historical presence of the indigenous Pehuenche populations. In numbers, the Pehuenche population in the area of inuence of the plants amounts to approximately 3,000 people, comprising 800 families in 10 communities (Pitril, Callaqui, El Avellano, Aukiñ Wallmapu, Quepuca Ralco, Ralco Lepoy, El Barco, Guayalí, Pewen Mapu and Ayin Mapu). In February 2017, an impoant collaboration agreement was signed with 25 families of the Aukiñ Wallmapu community to sta local development projects. The agreement resolves the conict regarding the impacts generated during the construction of the Ralco plant. On the same issue, in June 2017, Enel Generación Chile also signed two agreements with the El Avellano and Quepuca Ralco communities. In

March 2017, Enel Generación Chile ocially handed over to the El Barco community its ancestral cemetery, thereby providing a substantive response to the company's commitment to the community following the construction of the plant. In the same context, in 2020, Enel Generación Chile and the local communities marked an impoant step forward with the project for the Quepuca Ralco school. The construction of the school is pa of the company's commitments following the construction of the Ralco plant. The agreed plan celebrates the cultural identity of the Pehuenche communities.
Following a request made mainly by the El Avellano community, a community project was created in 2018 for the collection, transformation and sale of hazelnuts. In 2019, the production depament was inaugurated, which made it possible for the community to transform its autochthonous hazelnuts into subproducts to supply to the market, thereby expanding sales to other customers. The project is promoted by Enel Generación Chile, together with the University of Concepción, the community of El Avellano, the municipality of Alto Bío Bío and the Pehuén foundation. It made it possible to transform a traditional activity into a micro-entrepreneurial activity for the community, while also preserving the natural hazelnut forest. In consideration of the touristic and recreational potential of the areas near the plants, and in order to promote the social-economic development of the local communities, specic projects promoting sustainable tourism were staed. In paicular, one was staed for the area adjacent to the El Barco Laguna, where local business people currently oer camping, tour and gastronomy services. More than 6 thousand tourists visit the area every season, representing an impoant potential for this initiative. The collaboration between Enel and the community was car-

ried out mainly in order to improve the health situation of the area, install new toilet facilities and drains for the treatment of the waste water. A project is being developed in Los Chaicanes to promote potato cultivation. The initiative, which has the primary aim of selling the tuber locally to be eaten fresh, led to the production of seed potatoes and the recognition of the project by the agricultural and zootechnical service (Servicio Agrícola y Ganadero) as one of the 17 producers authorized to sell seed potatoes in the 32 communities of the region of La Araucanía. The establishment of community production cooperative allowed the community to access loans of more than 30,000 euros. During 2020, the cooperative played a fundamental role guaranteeing the food security of the municipality of Lonquimay. In fact the community was able to sell to the town 15,000 kg of potatoes during the health care emergency, which were distributed to families who were most impacted economically by the pandemic. In 2021, medical conditions allowing, a climate-controlled warehouse will be established for the storage of tubers, thereby expanding the storage period and giving oppounity to extend the marketing season. Again in 2021, the opening of a new processing warehouse is anticipated for increasing production capacity.
As concerns the direct suppo of local families and students, Enel assigns scholarships to nance school fees, the accommodations for young people in the cities where their schools are located and other school materials. This initiative has involved more than 700 students.
The Chilean Ministry of Public Works and Enel Generación Chile have signed an agreement, which was subsequently ratied also with the local associations that manage the irrigation channels in the area of Saltos del Laja, in the Bío Bío region. The objective of the agreement is to improve the exibility of use of the water, ensuring the supply to families and the generation of energy. The initiative is the result of a joint eo with the associations Canalistas del Laja and Canalistas del Canal Zañau, Dirección de Obras Hidráulicas, Dirección General de Aguas, Enel Generación Chile, Ministerio de Agricultura, Ministerio de Energía and Comisión Nacional de Riego. There is also an agreement with the municipality of Antuco in order to sta a pilot project to promote tourism in the area of Salto del Trubunleo during summer. In order to manage possible contingent or emergency situations in a quick and coordinated manner, a specic communication system was dened between the power plants of Pangue and Ralco of Enel Generación Chile, the Angostura di Colbún power plant, the municipalities of Alto Bío Bío, Quilaco and Santa Bárbara, the Ministry of the Interior and Public Security (ONEMI) and the Ministry of Energy. Fuher information can be found in the Enel Chile and Enel Generación Chile Sustainability Repo (www. enelgeneracion.cl).
Just a bit more south, in the region of Los Lagos, in the Mapuche community of Mapu Pilmaiquén, a project was staed to return approximately 6 hectares of indigenous land near the Pilmaiquén hydroelectric power station. Today, the community manages this territory with a sustainable tourism project, opening the area's ecosystem to visitors, which is explained according to the Mapuche cosmovision of conservation of the equilibrium of natural resources. This area, which is called Parque La Isla, welcomes approximately 6 thousand tourists every year, bringing economic benets to the community. A large amount of their prots are invested in park conservation. Thanks to the training of local aisans and the growing ow of visitors, an increasing number of people can benet from this project by selling their products. To guarantee the presence of the beautiful wate¥alls, Enel Generación Chile releases the water from its hydroelectric operation for the benet of local tourism.
In 2020, a new phase of the program was initiated and which envisages the integration of the "Community of water" in technological training programs. Water users were organized within the territory in Chile for correct distribution of this precious resource among the dierent users with rights. To identify initiatives for water preservation in the hydroelectric basins shared with the agricultural sector, in the region of Maule, a "Hydroenergy by design" study was carried out to identify conservation strategies jointly with the local stakeholders for the hydrogeological ecosystem. This program, shared with the territory, will lead to territorial environmental planning according to collective paicipation.
El Quimbo is the most imposing civil engineering project realized by the Enel Group over the past years and represents one of the greatest hydroelectric investments in South America. The power plant has an installed power of 400 MW and is located in the region of Huila, south-west of Bogotá. The project was authorized in March 2008 and obtained the environmental license in May 2009 and, in November 2010, construction began. The project consists of a 55 kilometer long reservoir, making one of the largest reservoirs in the nation, and its dam it is 151 meters high. The Quimbo Project has foreseen impoant investments for infrastructure, the environment and surrounding communities. From the beginning of construction, Enel has expressed its full availability for dialogue with regional and national stakeholders and has developed a specic socio-environmental management plan. With a shared and paicipatory approach, staing from December 2014, a multi-year plan of social-environmental projects was dened to benet the local population, and in paicular families living in or owning propey in the


area of project inuence, as well as those who work or have business activities and services in this area. The families that were surveyed and who meet the requirements were given the possibility to decide between relocation (collective/individual) and selling their land. Of the 152 families who decided for relocation, 40 selected individual relocation, receiving land for their productive and residential project. The remaining 112 families opted for relocation in the collective se©lements (Montea, Santiago y Palacio, Llano de la Virgen, San José de Belén), with new homes provided with essential services and inseed within an urban context with schools, churches, multi-purpose spos facilities, a football pitch, green areas, a waste recycling center and waste water treatment plants. Each family also received 5 hectares of land with an irrigation system in order to develop their own productive activity (crops or mini ranches). To date, 15 families living in one of the four collective relocated se©lements, called Santiago-Palacio already have the deeds to their plots, buildings and common areas of the residential center and are self-sucient.
During 2020, more than 350 visits were made to the owners of agricultural production projects. In 95% of cases the production system was monitored and suppoed, while in the remaining 5% processes were reinforced via technological transfer and legal/administrative suppo.
In addition, following the spread of Covid-19, the company contributed to tackling the food emergency, providing food in the six municipalities of the area aected directly, and the health care area, providing more than 500 personal protective equipment kits to the medical sta in 12 centers in 10 municipalities of the region of Huila (a total of 750 people).
The projects continued to address the needs of the community with a view to the creation of shared value, and new ones were launched with impoant entities and associations. In paicular:

The educational and suppo projects continued for the management and rational use of natural resources and environmental protection in the communities in the areas of direct and indirect inuence, including the educational institutions of the six municipalities in the area. In paicular, in 2020 the following was carried out:
courses in the electricity industry and consulting local interest groups for making them independent in the management and conception of projects;
› 7 actions dedicated to sustainable tourism which saw the paicipation of public and private institutions and organizations belonging to the areas directly inuenced. One of the initiatives launched the rst webinar on tourism, held by the University of Medellín: "Sustainable tourism in times of pandemic: An oppounity for change", which made possible to make tourism operators aware of the impact that this activity has on ecosystems and on the impoance of issues such as preservation of biodiversity, circular economy and climate change. Taking pa in the initiative were 58 people from the depaments of Huila, Caldas, Caquetá, Cundinamarca and Antioquia.
Specic communication channels were dened to provide information and respond to all the questions from the community regarding the project (dedicated web page, social channels, newsle©er etc.). In the Garzón and Gigante oces, around 580 people were assisted following requests and petitions. 96% of people were satised with the assistance they received.
Additional initiatives and information about the projects are available in the Emgesa Sustainability Repo 2020 (h©ps://) www.enel.com.co/es/medio-ambiente-desarrollo-sos)tenible.html)) and on the website dedicated to the project (https://www.enel.com.co/es/conoce-enel/enel-emgesa/ el-quimbo.html).
In March 2016, a consoium of Enel Green Power and the Moroccan company Nareva, in panership with the supplier Siemens Gamesa Renewable Energy, was awarded the project for the development, construction and management of ve wind plants in the communes of Midelt, Tanger, Jbel Lahdid, Boujdour and Tiskrad with a total installed capacity of 850 MW. Their construction will require a total investment of approximately 1 billion euros.
The investment will provide renewable energy, suppoing social, economic and environmental development in the various areas involved, increasing access to electricity and reducing dependence on fossil energy sources. The investment also complies with the principles adopted by the international community concerning environmental protection, human rights and the reduction of emissions from coal, and does not involve any kind of extraction.
In preparing the proposal, the consoium carried out a preliminary analysis of the social, economic and environmental context (SEECA) with the help of external specialists in the areas in which the plants are to be built. The SEE-CA identied the relevant socio-economic problems and the specic needs of the local communities that include, among others: development of infrastructure, development of education, health care, development of social services, povey and protection of cultural heritage.
Fuhermore, an Environmental Social Impact Assessment was carried out in compliance with the standards of the International Finance Corporation and with international guidelines, for investments in the Midelt and Boujdour sites. It is being carried out for the Jbel Lahdid site and will be developed for Tiskrad. Various consultation processes were carried out with the stakeholders in Midelt, Boujdour and Jbel Lahdid. For all sites, a second SEECA and consultation is pe¥ormed.
From the analyses pe¥ormed we can determine the impacts and benets for each site, from which the Sustainability Plans can be dened. The sustainability actions and projects are realized during all phases of the renewable project, staing from the construction and continuing into the operation. Specically, during the construction phase, the consoium is carrying out sustainability actions within the "sustainable construction site" model, based on practices and solutions that maximize the social, economic and environmental benets for the territory and surrounding communities. This model is a standard Enel practice adopted in all sites around the world.
For the Midelt plant, the nancial close was on November 5, 2018, and the construction phase staed in December 2018 and ended in November 2020. The application of the sustainable construction site model on this plant generated positive impacts for local communities in terms of employment, training and skills transfer: 300 workers, selected from local communities, were trained and employed by contractors and active local SMEs, for example in the transpo, hotel, restaurant and cleaning sectors.
The minimal environmental impacts were measured and therefore mitigated by adopting viuous solutions and actions regarding emissions, water consumption and waste. The main solutions that were implemented are indicated below:
The consultation of the SEECA for the Midelt site led to the denition of specic sustainability projects subject to development during the plant operation phase. A plan is also being nalized for the application of the Sustainable Plant Model, intended to maximize social, environmental and economic benets for the territory and surrounding communities during the operation phase, similar to that achieved during the construction phase with the sustainable construction site.
The adoption of a sustainable construction site model is also in progress for the Boujdour site with practices similar to those previously described. Specic actions have been also launched during the construction phase intended to maximize the benets for the surrounding communities in terms of employment, creation of skills and use of local SMEs, which will also continue during the plant operation phase.
In addition, during 2020, a due diligence of human rights was pe¥ormed for the Boujdour site based on the principle UN guidelines for businesses and human rights, with
Since 2014, Enel-Emgesa has developed the largest ecological restoration project of the dry tropical forest in Colombia over an area of 11,079 ha as an environmental compensation measure of the construction of the El Quimbo plant in the region of Huila. During the initial pilot phase (2014-2018), the best strategies and the native species subject to restoration were dened for an area of 140 ha. The primary results were the propagation of around 215 thousand plants of 62 indigenous species, the construction of 21,840 m of fencing for controlling the animals from neighboring farms, the building of a research center and the discovery of a new unique plant species called Pitcairnia huilensis. A protected area of 918 ha called Cerro Matambo was declared within the restoration area, to help preserve the biodiversity of the region. During the second phase, launched in 2018, a goal was set of 500 ha to be in active restoration by 2021, of which 240 ha had already been restored in 2020. This will involve the conservation and maintenance of 478 thousand plants of at least 40 dierent species. The project will continue in the subsequent years until completion of the goal of total restoration.
the suppo of a renowned independent non-prot organization with broad experience in this eld.
The result of this activity was the drafting of an action plan for interventions beyond the initiatives above mentioned, some of which had already been realized, for:
The results of the due diligence were also considered for a new SEECA and for dening the process for consulting representatives of the Saharawi population, carried out independently by primary company with proven experience in the area of sustainability. The consultation included vulnerable groups, all ethnic Saharawis, and was conducted in Hassaniyya Arabic, the Saharawi language, thanks to the inclusion of an expe on this ethnic group in the team. Interviews generally focused on: expectations and concerns about the project, perception of the project by the community, general challenges in the province and in the areas neighboring the site, means of suppo for the population, access to water and to electricity.
The consultation lead to a 'social license' to operate in light of the general acceptance of the renewal project by the Saharawi stakeholders, who highlighted numerous oppounities deriving from it in terms of employment and local economic development, evaluating the project in line with the advocacy activity they carried out for their people's right to development, work and access to energy. Some young people expressed the fear that the absence of local skills in the area of renewables would form an obstacle to their employment in the project. Therefore the Sustainability Plan specic to Boujdour promotes the inclusion within the project's value chain of the communities and small local businesses during the plant operation phase with a paicular focus on ethnic Saharawis, training and construction for local skills, intervention in favor of the more vulnerable herding communities, and suppo for local cooperatives.
The Enel Group wishes to drive the energy revolution in Colombia, also promoting the development of new operating dynamics, such as the introduction of energy offers, the creation of new oppounities for diversication of the existing energy mix and increase of market competition. This will generate a benet in the optimization of the use of energy resources which contribute to the eciency of the energy system in Colombia, a country which recently initiated the construction of new renewable energy projects. Via the Group's experience and know-how developed throughout the world, Enel Green Power is primed to oer Colombia a strong impulse for diversication of the energy generation mix, promoting and sustaining the development of renewable energy sources, i.e. wind and solar, and continuing to pay a©ention to future oppounities in the Colombian electricity sector.
In 2019 ve Enel Green Power projects were awarded around 740 GWh/year in the Cargo por Conabilidad tender. The winning projects, three of which were wind and two solar, will supply the country's energy systems. Windpeshi, Tumawind and Chemesky are the wind farms in the La Guajira depament, a region characterized by a signicant presence of the indigenous population, which represents 20% of this population in the whole country. Historically, it is a region with a very high rate of primary unmet needs such as access to potable water, energy and education.
For the Windpeshi plant, the Group launched the construction both of the wind farm and a transmission line. In both cases, the communities involved were consulted: 11 relating to the wind farm and 23 regarding the transmission line. The consultation process enabled identifying oppounities for developing projects that can promote access to both potable water and to education. In paicular with reference to:
› access to potable water, the Windpeshi public water system was established, a sustainable system for promoting water access for rural communities around the region The project will benet 3 thousand Wayuu indigenous people and will allow them to obtain water, draw it and make it drinkable, store and distribute it, improving the population's quality of life. This project was nanced by the "obras por impuestos" mechanism and falls within the Colombian Ministry of Housing's "Guajira azul" program. A second water system, Amalipa will benet the communities in the area of inuence of the transmission line. Lastly, to allow the use of water for other purposes, via the agreement signed between Enel Green Power, the Ministry of Housing, as pa of the "Guajira Azul" program, Foundation ACDI/VOCA, the Colombian army and the municipal administrations of Uribia and Maicao, the construction and restoration of the wells are proceeding, which will facilitate access to water sources in the La Guajira Depament;
› access to education, an agreement was signed with SENA (National Training Service) for launching employment training and sustainable entrepreneurship processes in the communities aected by the projects, as well as non-qualied specialization in the project activities. During 2020, 65 people were



trained on topics relating to construction.
An agreement was also reached with the University of La Guajira for the drafting of an intercultural manual, which will represent an essential instrument for interaction in the various projects in the Wayuu territory, including the dynamics and specics of the ethnic communities. Lastly, via an agreement with Aesanías de Colombia,
traditional processing of Wayuu fabrics is being promoted in the area aected by the Windpeshi wind farm.
ReShape: Innovability® to build a be er future
The ability to anticipate and adapt to change has become a crucial pa of business. The global scenario of Covid-19 has forced companies to stop and think about their internal and external processes and about their way of innovating. In our capacity as sector leader, and keeping in mind our sustainability objectives, we have launched a global call to reinvent the manner in which our activities are managed in what will be the new normality.
ReShape is a global call for the energy transition, to conceive, along with problem solvers, sta-ups and small and medium-sized enterprises new ways to transform innovation into solutions for the world energy context of the future and for new global needs. The term chosen, ReShape, refers to the ability of the organization to change and reinvent itself constantly, both inside and outside, and reects our global commitment to Open Innovability®.
The challenges launched with our call cover all our Business Lines: from energy generation to the creation of new added value products and services, from robotics to ai cial intelligence, from viual reality to automation, from construction of renewable plants up to technologies and algorithms to understand be©er the needs of customers and thus rationalize the entire customer journey in the digital era. Some examples:
New
Goals


| 1 At a Glance |
2 | 3 Our ESG peormance |
Trend Topic | 4 | Appendix | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Priorities Economic and nancial F value creation Innovation and digital N transformation |
Plan Growth accelerators |
SDG PARTNERSHIPS INDUSTRY, INNOVATION AND FOR GOALS INFRASTRUCTURE |
||||||
| Target | ||||||||
| Activities | 2020-2022 targets | 2020 results | Status | 2021-2023 targets | Tag | SDG | ||
| • Further enhance the reach of our innovation ecosystem, to find the best solutions on a global scale • Generate value by solving the ever |
Launch of 200 Proof of Concept to test innovative solutions in the period 2020-2022 |
111 projects launched | ON-PLAN | Launch of 350 Proof of Concept to test innovative solutions in the period 2021-2023 |
||||
| increasing needs of the Business Lines, by enabling open innovation tools (collaboration with start-ups, crowdsourcing, partners, universities, intelligence, technological |
Scale-up of 30 solutions to accelerate the implementation of the Strategic Plan in the period 2020-2022 |
32 solutions adopted in the business |
ON-PLAN | Scale-up of 100 solutions to accelerate the implementation of the Strategic Plan in the period 2021-2023 |
||||
| communities, solution design activities) |
75 bootcamps to identify startups with which to collaborate |
45 bootcamps | ON-PLAN | Target exceeded as a result of the digitization of activities |
Industrial Environmental Social Governance Technological Redened Outdated E
INNOVATION
Innovation and Sustainability
I n order to survive, living beings renew their cells continuously. A culture of widespread Innovability means that the whole Company aims to renew itself constantly, thereby ensuring its survival.
Ernesto Ciorra
"Sustainability is our goal and innovation is our tool to achieve it". We innovate in order to create the conditions to be more sustainable. These two concepts that go hand in hand, and which merge in the word Innovability®, dened for the rst time by us and which demonstrates the degree to which one deeply permeates the other.
An "Open" approach that promotes the richness of innovation by involving internal and external entities and that makes us ready to reassess several traditional business models with a view to creating new ones.
We want to innovate to safeguard the environment, but also to create conditions of equality and inclusion for those who otherwise would have fewer possibilities, including from a work related perspective. A practical example: in our Company we have a deaf person, who feared that he/she would not have the same oppounities for growth since he/she could not use video conference systems without lip reading. We therefore found a sta-up with which we put together a service that has allowed all of our deaf people to take pa actively in video conferences in a pe¥ectly integrated way. The step from social to economic sustainability was, at the end of the day, brief: having facilitated the inclusion of people into the Company, we moved on to customers, which meant doing something socially useful, but which was also a business choice. It is enough to think how many millions of deaf or paially deaf customers can benet from this service and how many can be made loyal to the Company, thus making us even more competitive and sustainable.
We identify the most innovative solutions to meet the main challenges of sustainable development as well as the 17 SDGs of the 2030 Agenda of the United Nations, both in line with and as a suppo for the Group's Strategic Plan. The Company fuher dedicates a pa of innovation to exploration activities which can open signicant new fronts of innovation in the near future. Currently, we are dening a three-year innovation plan, shared with top management and submi©ed for approval to the Group Innovation Commi©ee, chaired by the Chief Executive Ocer. The Holding Innovability® Function (Innovation and Sustainability), repoing directly to the CEO, in collaboration with the various Functions and Business Lines in all countries where the Group operates, manages innovation activities, in conformity with regulations currently in force and with our own compliance programs. Fuhermore, dedicated facilities at Business Line level have been set up to facilitate the development and dissemination of innovative solutions.
In order to promote innovative solutions, we have created new instruments, such as openinnovability.com, a crowdsourcing platform for gathering the best solutions, the Innovation Academy and the Idea Factory to leverage the interaction and development of creativity and entrepreneurship within the Company. In addition, a global network of Innovation Hubs and Labs is present in order to make contact with sta ups and other stakeholders present in the innovation ecosystems around the world.
INNOVATION DMA EU (former EU8)
The way to win challenges and lead change is to search constantly for innovations that can promote sustainable development, sta-ups, independent innovators, potential paner companies, universities and research centers, associations and ONGs.
We are open to innovative ideas in a very dynamic way: stimuli and inuences can arrive from outside and inside the Company. It is impoant that there are the right ecosystems in which information can circulate and give life to sustainable and scalable business projects and models.
Our crowdsourcing platform, openinnovability.com, has hosted over 145 challenges in total, reached 500,000 solvers, gathered thousands of solutions originating in over 100



countries worldwide, assigned economic awards and entered into collaboration agreements with Italian and international companies, sta-ups, researchers and single individuals.
Specically, in 2020 53 innovation and sustainability challenges were launched, of which 15 cross-posted on pa ner platforms, 28 dedicated exclusively to people within the Company and 10 targeted externally. Seventeen challenges concerning the health emergency linked to the Covid-19 pandemic were also launched. In paicular, while the world has begun to dene a new normality, we have launched the global challenge ReShape, with the aim of identifying innovative solutions for the future of energy and to face emerging needs. Of the more than 300 innovative proposals received, around half are from ecosystems that are under the responsibility of the Innovation Hub (for more detailed information see page 145).
The challenges launched by Enel have also been disseminated on other platforms (for example, innovitalia.esteri.it of the Italian Ministry of Foreign Aairs and International Co-operation) and specialist channels (Focus.it, Wired.co.uk and Rinnovabili.it). At the same time, our crowdsourcing platform is open to the publication of challenges from external companies that are seeking innovative and sustainable solutions to unresolved problems. In 2020, 6 challenges for external companies such as the ESA (European Space Agency), Marzo©o Venture Accelerator and Extreme-e were published and/or managed.
2,600
START-UPS
70
with which Enel came into contact despite the pandemic
with sta-ups around the world
53
INNOVATION AND SUSTAINABILITY CHALLENGES LAUNCHED
We must change in harmony with the world around us, with the people that live in it, with the society to which we contribute, and with the environment in which we live. Only in this way can we really create sustainable progress.
Sustainability is our goal and innovation is our tool to achieve it.
As of today, 64 innovation panership agreements with companies of di§erent sizes and markets are active. Of these, 8 are of Group relevance with the involvement of various Business Lines in dierent thematic areas.
During the last year, agreements have been renewed with Cisco Systems and Intesa Sanpaolo, the former focused on the development of products and services to suppo the achievement of IoT platforms and cyber security functionalities, and the la©er with the aim of facilitating, on the one hand, access to credit for sta-ups and small and medium-sized companies of the energy ecosystem and, on the other, the development of digital innovation.
Collaborations related to the circular economy have also been developed, in paicular with Novamont for the recycling of plastics and the use of biodegradable oils, and with the US multinational 3M for the use of new materials and sensor technology for the health and safety of our people, predictive maintenance, and eciency of the distribution grids and generation plants.
We are also pursuing collaboration in the sector of the space economy, cooperating with several market leaders among which Thales Alenia Space, a reference point for the realization of space technology and a paner for the achievement of innovative space services, especially satellite technology. Together with the ESA, we are fuher promoting the development of space sector applications to suppo the security of the distribution grid, economic and environmental sustainability and circular cities.
The Innovation Hubs and Labs help the Group to consolidate the new collaboration model with sta-ups and SMEs, which sees the la©er propose innovative solutions and new business models, whereas we make available our expeise, facilities for testing, and a global network of paners to suppo their ne-tuning and scale-up. We rely on a global network of:
For fuher details visit the site: h©ps://staup.enel.com. Despite the pandemic, in 2020 we met more than 2,600 sta-ups, launched more than 70 new collaborations and organized more than 40 bootcamps dedicated to dierent technological areas; fuhermore, two new geographical Countries and Regions (Canada and Australia) were opened for the scouting of sta-ups. Enel X and Mastercard won a tender from the Israeli government for the creation of an innovation laboratory which aims to stimulate the development of ntech and cyber security sta-ups in Israel (FinSec Lab in Be'er Sheva). The Innovation Lab will be capable of simulating systems, processes and nancial data to supply an environment in which the sta-ups can develop, test and display their products.
Impoant objectives were achieved during 2020 with regard to innovations which included generation and distribution of energy, aimed at accelerating sustainable growth towards the energy transition, through the study and adoption of innovative technologies and solutions for increasing sustainability and eciency, as well as suppoing safety on worksites and the operation and maintenance of assets. Through innovation we have demonstrated our resilience by remodeling approaches and processes, beginning with automation, remote control systems and technologies to suppo security, viual visits, remote maintenance tools, solutions for and surveys of augmented and mixed realities, on worksites and in power plants, as well as aicial intelligence, and nishing with remote operations and experimental activities. The new approach adopted has involved not only us, but the entire network of paners, facilitating the remodeling of the innovation journey and suppoing the entire ecosystem.
Pontecosi: a big project in a small lake. In Tuscany, Enel Green Power is testing an innovative system for the management of the sediments that accumulate in the basin of an aicial lake. It is a project that could help the entire hydroelectric industry in as much as, besides reducing operating and maintenance costs, the solution is capable of restoring natural river transpo, thereby contrasting phenomena of coastal erosion.
Innovative solutions for detecting ice on the blades of wind turbines. An experimental campaign on an innovative system for automatically detecting the presence of ice on turbines, using optical ber, has been successfully completed on a wind farm in Greece. The initial results show great potential for improving the safety of operators and reducing production losses.
Solutions of aicial intelligence for a computerized vision to suppo wind turbine maintenance. The aicial intelligence solution has shown the eciency on 45 wind turbines of solutions for recognizing images which facilitate the automatic detection of faults. The solution is completely integrated into our image acquisition approach and leads to a 60% reduction in inspection and data analysis times compared to the current method.
Sma meters. We can be considered among the world leaders in sma meter technologies, also known as Open Meters, for which we are pu©ing into eect our third generation, in which our cu©ing edge technologies enable functionalities that go beyond the traditional concept of simple measuring. It is a customer centric approach that exploits a dedicated channel of communication (Chain 2) through Power Line Communication, oering customers the chance to receive real time data on energy consumption, but also to optimize grid operations (using predictive maintenance, load balancing and protection of revenues) in terms of quality and eciency. Robotics. Four legs to be able to move over dierent types of terrain and environments, the ability to customize in order to carry various types of mission, two hours of autonomy and, above all, the capacity to take on board and learn from the variety of activities that it carries out. We are talking about ANYmal, produced by ANYbotics, the Swiss sta-up identi ed during a bootcamp organized by the Madrid Innovation Hub. It will be capable of carrying out missions both in autonomous mode and by giving added value to the people of Global Power Generation Enel, providing suppo and help. ANYmal combines the locomotion capacity of an animal's body with the use of algorithms of aicial intelligence, which allow it to analyze the surrounding environment - internal or external - and to take reasoned decisions.
ANYmal underwent successful experiments in Italy at the

combined cycle thermal power plant in Poo Corsini (Ravenna). It is a signicant innovation at the service of the human component: the robot can help our people to carry out autonomous inspections, generating added value and intervening in environments that are dicult to reach or potentially risky.
Electric mobility: Enel X JuiceBox Pro and JuiceBox Pro Cellular. This is the latest line of domestic charging stations, which unites sustainability and innovation and presents a case realized in recycled plastic and a design which aims at reuse and recycling. In 2021, in Europe alone, 30,000 new Boxes will be produced, using 62 tons of waste plastic. The results in terms of pe¥ormance are comparable to those obtained using virgin plastic (see also the chapter on the circular economy).
In May 2020, the World Economic Forum recognized our Network Digital Twin® as an extraordinary innovation born within the energy sector to enhance systemic eciency. This program is a digital platform that creates a viual replica of the infrastructure of physical power supply, of its components and of system dynamics. It is based on the use of new technologies such as 3D modeling for the examination of grid components, sensors for monitoring the infrastructure together with aicial intelligence and augmented and viual reality, with a view to improving operations in the eld and management of data in real time. These combined applications suppo the functioning of the system, grid design, integration of distributed energy resources and management of the workforce.
Fuher innovative solutions are dealt with in the various chapters of the present document.
We have created the Innovation Communities, open communities, without hierarchies, made up of our people who are passionate about technology (and not only), who desire to share ideas and projects and to paicipate rsthand in the innovation process. They are groups of people open to other views and to the exchange of experiences, ready to accept new ideas and oppounities, and who share a basic project: to make the world a be©er place using sustainable innovations. The communities are dedicated to a crucial innovation topic, from aicial intel-
ligence to robotics, from drones to the Blockchain, and are a point of reference for dierent technologies.
other alternative technologies for long-term storage applications.
a product, above all because it facilitates the reduction of production or repair times, thus ensuring greater reliability. In paicular, this process concerns the fabrication of mechanical components for the repairing of impoant elements subject to wear and tear (turbine blades, burner pas) and for redesigning and creating innovative components with complex geometries and special materials. As of today, the biggest challenge that this technology must overcome concerns above all the denition of a quality system for nished products. This means dening modalities of production and precise parameters based above all on the behavior of the materials, which inevitably changes compared to traditional techniques of production.
› Green hydrogen: through this Community, we have dened a new business unit dedicated to developing projects linked to the production of green hydrogen through electrolysis, powered by renewable sources. Once the potential of direct electrication has been exploited to the full, this technology could facilitate the reduction of emissions in those sectors in which the la©er are more dicult to abate.
In 2020 three new Communities were also launched: Materials, Computer Generative Design and Sensors. These themes will be studied and analyzed in-depth during 2021, to facilitate synergies and promote the application of new use cases in Group activities.
An innovative agship program, launched in 2018 to promote the diusion of robotized ready-to-market technologies for O&M activities along the entire value chain to facilitate the allocation of people to value added activities1 , with economic savings included.
The main technologies that are the subject ma©er of the program, active in 14 countries, are thermographies with drones and AI, wind turbine inspections with drones and AI, robotized bathymetries, underwater inspections with ROVs, remote assistance on smaphones, sma glass and augmented reality, inspections with drones on thermal,
hydro and geothermal plants. The main results in 2020 are as follows:
At the end of 2021 a rate of robotization of 60% is envisaged, with a growth of robotizable activities of 149%.
(1) All activities in which an allocation of our people or those of suppliers and stakeholders is recognised on greater value activities compared to those executed in the traditional manner (because they are safer, are exposed to lower risks, have more training, are allocated to more digital and less
(2) Index of robotization = robotized activities/robotizable activities. Robotizable activities are all those activities eligible for application of robotization (for example, manual thermography, where it is now possible to carry out inspections with drones, or bathymetry done by people maneuvering a traditional boat, that is now possible to do with a robotized boat). Robotizable activities have been calculated via a mapping of all cases in which ready-to-market robotized products are present and multiplied by annual frequency. Robotized activities are all those robotized for each use case
Our intellectual heritage is a complex of critical information and is at the base of a sustainable growth. The ecosystem of Open Innovability® generates innovation through the

sharing of internal and external solutions that give life to a ow of ideas that demands suitable forms of protection. On the one hand, intellectual propey presides over and regulates the sharing of ideas, technologies and knowledge which originate both in the Company and in sta-ups, universities, with suppliers, programers and consultants; and, on the other, in so far as it is the authentic expression of the link between knowledge, innovation and progress, it is a tool at the service of strategic objectives of decarboni-
zation, electrication and creation of platforms, as well as the collaborative model based on Stewardship.
During 2020, we renewed and reinforced our commitment to the prosecution of the project targeted at the recognition, identication and measurement of our intellectual propey heritage.
Specically, the Group avails, overall, of 837 patents for inventions, belonging to 137 technology families; of these, 692 are patents awarded and 145 pending. This pofolio ensures protection on all the markets in which the Group is present. Our pofolio also includes 8 utility models and 130 design registrations. As regards trademarks, at the moment it is estimated that the Group owns 1,301, of which 1,133 already awarded and 168 pending approval.
The numerical increase of our whole pofolio of intellectual rights mirrors the growing in-house eos targeted at reinforcing the information infrastructure required for the immediate identication of the innovation generated, its evaluation and protection, as well as the continuous monitoring of the evolution of the pofolio. All this is with a view to continuous and precise alignment between technological and commercial trajectories and the corresponding forms of oversight of the competitive advantage ensured by intellectual propey rights. Progressively, the organization will proceed to the recognition of other intangible assets, rst among which are the many and crucial software components, through which the pervasive digital potential of our Business Lines are expressed.
In the framework of the Global Infrastructure & Networks Business Line, our patent heritage contributes in a signi cant manner to the strategy of creating platforms and the exploitation of network externalities in the services market, as well as automation of the management of utilities, with a reduction of related CO2 emissions and operating costs. In paicular, two patent families are most signicant: that of the method for remote detection of electricity, water and gas consumption, and that of the system for the remote reading and control of electricity consumption. Within the Enel X Business Line, paicularly signicant are the design and patent to protect JuiceAbility, the device produced in recycled plastic which powers the charging stations for electric wheelchairs, thus increasing the autonomy of customers with disabilities. Also of signicance is the design of the JuicePole, an infrastructure for the public recharging of electric vehicles designed for positioning in an urban context, and which was awarded the Compasso d'Oro by ADI (Associazione del Design Industriale). To these rights we can add technologies of load optimization of energy assets and sma charging of recharging stations that take into consideration system requirements, customer behavior, environmental factors, and optimization mechanisms for B2B customer energy systems which, through the management of electricity consumption, help to identify the ideal balance point between economic sustainability and eciency of the system itself.
Global Power Generation patents aim to:
We want innovation to be the daily work of everyone, to promote and diuse the culture, the knowledge and the behaviors of Open Innovability, disseminate methodologies for leveraging innovation and promote the entrepreneurial spirit. Eight Idea Hubs are present in Argentina, Brazil, Chile, Colombia, Italy, Romania, Spain and Peru, which design and manage global and local programs and supply the tools to facilitate the adoption of innovative instruments, thereby favoring creativity. These Hubs promote an approach that allows people to think and act dierently, in a non-linear way, as well as encouraging experimentation and suppoing the Company in overcoming challenges (new problems or oppounities) using innovative methods.

covering dierent roles: they are facilitators of workshops that stimulate lateral thinking, the co-creation of innovative solutions and customer centricity; in-house teachers of Innovation Academy courses; mentors on innovative projects in the development and realization phase and, nally, promoters of events targeted at introducing and encouraging innovation. This Community, based on the voluntary collaboration of paicipants, fuher promotes inte¥unctional collaboration and proactiveness at all levels.
› MAKE IT HAPPEN!: This program of Company entrepreneurship aims to make our entrepreneurs emerge by giving them the oppounity to propose and develop new ideas capable of creating value for the Company. In 2020, we received 91 project proposals, which saw the involvement of over 250 people from 11 countries. Three events for the presentation of ideas and projects were held (Pitch Day, during which 7 projects were introduced, 6 of which moved to development phase).
A variety of collaborations are active with universities and national and international research centers, with the aim of maintaining a constant, multidisciplinary and focused dialogue on the challenges of the energy transition.
In 2020 we reinforced the panership with We4U, World Energy 4 Universities, the network of universities coordinated by the Enel Foundation and with which our Group is facing the challenges of the energy transition. The last annual meeting, held in December 2020, had as its title "The power of knowledge for a clean energy future", a theme linked precisely to the global ambition of We4U, which aims to exploit the synergies between the academic and business worlds to ensure a sustainable future for everyone. It is a program, consolidated by over 5 years of activity, which sees among our paners the Polytechnic of Milan, the Polytechnic of Turin, Bocconi University, Sant'Anna High School, Ricerca sul Sistema Energetico (RSE), UC Berkeley, MIT, Columbia University (NYC), Comillas University (Madrid), Strathmore University (Nairobi), University of Genoa, LUISS (Free International University of Social Studies) and, most recently, Venice International University and the University of Salerno.
New Goals
| Priorities | Plan | SDG | Activities to reduce CO2 emissions |
-10 mil printed pages | -48 mil printed pages compared to 2019 |
||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Economic and †nancial F value creation Innovation and digital N transformation |
Growth accelerators Target |
INDUSTRY, SUSTAINABLE CITIES INNOVATION AND AND COMMUNITIE INFRASTRUCTURE |
RESPONSIBLE CONSUMPTION AND PRODUCTION |
Extension of the use of videocommunication systems |
Intensive use of the "Unified Communica tions and Collaboration" (UCC) platform4, with the integration of video communication services; 5 mil meetings held via video communication services |
||||
| Activities | 2020-2022 targets | 2020 results | Status | 2021-2023 targets | Tag | SDG | Reduction of CO2 produced for optimization of PCs, |
Enhancement of mobile accessibility, with a fu—her reduction |
|
| Coverage of web applications posted on the internet with advanced cyber security application solutions |
100% | 100% | ACHIEVED | Target reached and removed |
laptops and monitors in Italy |
in idle hours; 18 mil hours of downtime |
|||
| Disseminating the IT security culture and changing people's behaviour in order to reduce risks |
15 cyber security knowledge-sharing events held each year |
16 events delivered | ON-PLAN | 15 cyber security knowledge-sharing events held each year |
|||||
| Information security verication activities (Ethical Hacking, |
500 verication activities per year |
1,139 verication activities carried out |
ON-PLAN | 800 verification activities per year |
|||||
| Vulnerability Assessment, etc.) |
Industrial Environmental Social Governance Technological Redened Outdated E

| Activities to reduce CO2 emissions |
2020-2022 targets | 2020 results | Status | 2021-2023 targets | Tag | SDG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Activities | -10 mil printed pages | -48 mil printed pages compared to 2019 |
ON-PLAN | -13 mil printed pages in 2023 (vs. 2019)3 |
||
| Extension of the use of videocommunication systems |
ON-PLAN Intensive use of the "Unified Communica tions and Collaboration" systems (UCC) platform4, with the integration of video communication services; 5 mil meetings held via video communication services |
Extension of the use of videocommunication ON-PLAN Activities to reduce PC, laptop and monitor downtime |
||||
| Reduction of CO2 produced for optimization of PCs, laptops and monitors in Italy |
Enhancement of mobile accessibility, with a fu—her reduction in idle hours; 18 mil hours of downtime |
(1) This refers to training services, carried out by a mixture of cyber and business personnel, which is mandatory and necessary to educate internal stakeholders on the correct use of the Enel CERT in terms of engagement, communication, communication condentiality and cyber incident response services
(3) The 2020 result has been signicantly impacted tied to the pandemic. The target has therefore been redened from 2019, being a year not aected by this
Technology has embarked on a journey that doesn't seem to stop, especially during the period of the pandemic, characterized by bywords and concepts such as cyber security, sma working, data driven, and platformization. Enel faced 2020 with marked resilience which, rather than resulting from of contingent challenges, is the consequence of a path already taken several years ago rstly with the decision to adopt a cloud computing approach, ultimately allowing us to overcome this disruption thanks to our ability to rely on a modern and exible structure. The Group is commi©ed to protecting its critical infrastructure, disseminating the cyber security culture, viualizing asset management operating activities, and promoting the use of video communication systems.
The radical and high-speed energy transition process requires utility companies to evolve and become the coordinators of a complex system with multiple actors/owners and dierent technologies and locations. We will need to take conventional asset-intensive business models, which are typically linear in nature, and add also circular platform type models. In this context, digital technology will play a key role because the platform will enable management of this growing level of complexity overseeing a sustainable energy transition within a constantly evolving normative context. Scalability and eciency will be guaranteed by models of reuse and plug&play techniques enabled by digital technology which, in turn, will bring down marginal costs. Thanks to digital technology, customers – simultaneously consumers and generators of energy – will play an increasingly active role in the ecosystem, acquiring innovative and sustainable energy solutions and services and gaining access to a pool of shared resources.
Since 2015 we have been focusing on simplifying application maps, developing global technologies that can be used horizontally across the entire value chain, shifting from hundreds of technologies to just a handful.
Enel has decided to pick up on this value creation oppounity by se©ing up two complementary business models: the traditional "Ownership business model", in which the platforms form a powe¥ul business accelerator suppoing the pro tability of investments, and a "Stewardship business model", in which Enel becomes a business generator, catalyzing the investments of third pay suppliers of services and products.
Eectively, Enel is accelerating the launch of digital solutions for platforms throughout the entire organization:
› in electricity generation, our digital platforms suppo the extension of the pofolio of power plants for the development of the business, engineering and construction, operation, and maintenance, also including resources ma-
naged through joint ventures and panerships;
The process of integrating digital technologies in services, infrastructures, and in all aspects of the business has resulted in substantial changes in terms of culture, processes, and value creation, following the development of new sustainable business models. Robotics, Aicial Intelligence, cyber security, Big Data, and cloud computing are among the core elements in which Enel is investing.
In Enel, the digital transformation process is guided by the Global Digital Solutions unit which, working together with all the Holding's Business Lines and Functions, guides strategic choices, denes development paths, and guarantees their implementation. The operating models call for an agile working approach to anticipate market demand, with


Global Digital Solutions
T he cloud, as well as digitalization of services and of the infrastructure, are the pillars of our digital strategy and have confirmed their key role during the pandemic emergency: we have proven that our systems are reliable, robust and secure.

Carlo Bozzoli
constant a©ention paid to satisfying internal and external customers, to guarantee innovation and exibility, and the Company's rapid adaptation and reaction to change.
Digitalization is a key dimension of the transformation of the energy sector. Thanks to the growing digitalization of services and infrastructures, we support the process of energy transition.
Digitalization between new opportunities and challenges: support the energy transition and spread a culture of cybersecurity.
COVERAGE OF WEB APPLICATIONS
1,139 INFORMATION SECURITY VERIFICATION ACTIVITIES
100
%
posted on the internet with advanced cyber security application solution
Four key platforms that make routine activities more sustainable
For Enel, cloud infrastructure is a fundamental strategic enabler that has allowed the use of IT resources in terms of infrastructure and applications whenever required, since fully exploiting the access possibilities provided by the network makes it possible to reduce waste deriving from consumption linked to unused resources. The cloud used by Enel requires approximately 16% less energy on average than conventional on-premise infrastructure, allowing an average reduction of CO2 emissions of around 88%.
The Unied Communications and Collaboration (UCC) Platform integrates communication services in real time such as instant messaging (chats), IP telephony, and video communication with dierent media, such as voicemail, email, text messaging and fax, fully exploiting the sharing model that uses the Internet to allow sharing and use of contents from a PC, smaphone or tablet. This reduces the need for travel and hence CO2 emissions.
The e-API digital ecosystem (Enel Application Programming Inte¥ace) is the digital environment through which all companies in the Enel Group can quickly and automatically share information that would normally be limited to speci c veical applications (information silos). The ecosystem is suppoed by an API, thanks to which the Company's systems can exchange information ows in real time by means of inte¥aces and data tracks, making use of the latest developments in interoperability standards. This ecosystem has helped to speed up the adoption of digital solutions, facilitate the eective reuse and exchange of information, reduce data redundancies in Enel and, more generally, reduce the time and resources used in the exchange of information ows.
The initiative forms pa of Enel's broader strategic BCC program (Beyond Cloud Computing), in which software-dened WAN (technology able to optimize cloud-based access to applications and the use of connectivity) and edge computing solutions are merged to create a telecommunications architecture that helps to pursue operational excellence through intensive digitalization of processes.
In one of the world's largest business telecommunications network viualization initiatives, this project has speeded up the Group's process of digital transformation. Created and developed in Italy by Enel with Accenture, Cisco and Sii, the program has led to a reduction in operating costs while signicantly increasing agility of corporate infrastructure, connecting more than 1,000 sites in 3 continents and more than 10 countries (Italy, Spain, Argentina, Brazil, Chile, Colombia, Peru, Russia, and several sites in Noh America).
Enel has therefore greatly reduced its go-to-market times, optimizing management costs through rationalization of systems, and also reduced operating costs, making it possible, for example, to handle maintenance operations remotely. In addition, Enel can upgrade its network with innovative technologies such as the IoT and augmented/viual reality in order to facilitate control, management and maintenance of its geographically distributed assets. The new infrastructure's capabilities and agility played a key role in overcoming disruptions caused by the Covid-19 pandemic, when Enel was very quick to implement sma working for more than 37 thousand people, allowing them to access the Company's applications and work in safety.
Enel beyond the cloud: more than one thousand sites connected with one of the biggest network viualization projects in the world



Video
communication
MEETINGS (no.)
2020 2019
5,083,992* 244,030
2018
49,219
CO2 AVOIDED
(t)
2020 2019
443,696 242,160
2018
48,984
*Value impacted by the Covid eect.
Machine learning technologies have been adopted by Enel to conduct predictive analysis in relation to the maintenance of electricity distribution networks and generation plants, identifying possible errors in advance and acting before faults occur on the main components. Reducing the risk of malfunctions has a signicant impact not only in economic terms, but also in relation to the environment and personal safety. This has led to improvements in the service quality provided making it more sustainable over time, while also optimizing the use of internal resources, boosting occupational safety levels, and allowing focused inspections, especially of the most fault-susceptible equipment.
38 CO2 PRODUCED (t) 159.6 332.1 330.4 number of pages printed and the technical specications of the various printer models, the quantity of CO2 associated with consumption by printers when printing is calculated, applying each Country's emissions factor (source: Enerdata) resulting from the specic local mix of energy sources1 .
PC Power Management Italy HOURS OF DISUSE (mil h) 18 32 The printing service, which is operational in all Enel sites, takes advantage of the latest generation of printers specically designed for more eco sustainable use and is developed around an evolved business model that has made it possible to transition from a product concept to a service concept. Thanks to the service characteristics, combined with a more rational use of printouts, and to digitalization, we have been able to reduce paper consumption over the years, thus lowering our environmental impact. Specically, staing from the 2020 2019




These actions led to a spread in the use of video communication solutions, helping to maximize savings on travel and out of oce missions while also reducing CO2 emissions. 157 CO2 PRODUCED (t) 8.4 12.5 15.7

2020 2019
2018
2020 2019
2018
PC Power
(1) Enerdata release of April 15, 2020. Considers data in the following countries: Italy, Spain, Russia, Romania, Brazil, Chile, Peru, Colombia. 2018 2020 2019 2018
Management

Italy
HOURS OF DISUSE
(mil h)
2020 2019
18 32
2018
38
CO2 PRODUCED
(t)
2020 2019
159.6 332.1
2018
330.4
*Value impacted by the Covid eect.
Video
communication
MEETINGS (no.)
5,083,992* 244,030
49,219
CO2 AVOIDED
(t)
443,696 242,160
48,984
In 2020, monitoring continued of electricity consumption outside normal working hours1 linked to the IT workstations (desktop computers, laptops, monitors) of Enel people working in Italy. This measurement is possible because the IT worksta-
Printing service PAGES (mln) 88 136 By means of the "Unied Communications & Collaboration" platform, Enel strengthened, integrated and extended its digital services and tools during the Covid-19 pandemic. tions are equipped with a Microsoft function2 that reveals times when a workstation is switched on but unused. Following the analysis, specic awareness raising initiatives were de ned, aimed at reducing electricity consumption. This led to a reduction in hours of disuse and the new IT tools supplied to Enel people during the Covid-19 pandemic led to a reduction in emissions.
A path of transformation cannot be pursued without placing people at the center of the process and meeting their needs. For the people working in Enel, digitalization is a new way of thinking of corporate processes, staing from the experience gained within the Company, following an integrated services logic and exploiting the new oppounities oered by digital technology to the full. Also, the IT equipment life cycle is managed with the aim of extending the useful life of each device as long as possible through initiatives such as selling decommissioned equipment to Enel people and promoting reuse and recycling when the equipment reaches the end of its life cycle.
(2) Monday-Friday (from 7 pm to 7 am); Saturday and Sunday. The monitoring excluded servers and PCs that must be constantly on by nature (e.g. GESI application, Enel Points, Energy Exchange, etc.). Specically, the indicator represents the amount of CO2 associated with the electricity consumption of desktop computers, laptops and monitors, calculated after application of the average CO2 emission value per unit of electricity generated (gCO2 /kWh) in relation to the mix of sources present in Italy.
(3) System Center Conguration Manager.
The speed of technological development always brings new challenges: and the frequency and intensity of cyber-attacks are on the rise, as is the tendency to focus on critical infrastructure and strategic industrial sectors, highlighting a potential risk of interruption of normal business activities, in extreme cases. Technological transformation would be unthinkable without paying careful a©ention to cyber security issues.
Typical cyber-a©ack types have changed radically in recent years: the number has grown exponentially, as has their level of sophistication and impact, with timely identication of sources becoming increasingly dicult. In addition, the Covid-19 pandemic has led to a fuher increase in cyber-a©acks all over the world. This background obliges companies to implement preventive measures to protect their assets, improving and strengthening their cyber security protocols.
Apa from the constant adoption and application of the cyber security strategy, Enel has taken special measures, aware that cyber risk is not only a business threat but can become a huge risk for the entire electricity industry. For example, a large scale blackout in this scenario would have socio-economic ramications throughout the population, companies and key institutions. Also, the regulations and laws that produce common guidelines to combat cyber risks must necessarily keep abreast of their ongoing evolution. The key elements are therefore sharing and cooperation on cyber security issues with paicipation among all stakeholders including companies, legal institutions, supervisory bodies, suppliers, customers, and employees. The cyber security path to suppo Enel's digital transformation is based on the denition, valorization, and progressive adoption at Group level of security governance models, infrastructure, and services, in order to fully exploit available oppounities to boost the cyber resilience of infrastructure and applications. In line with the Open Power approach, we have adopted a holistic, systemic vision that is fully compliant with the emerging needs of the electricity industrial sector, and also embarked on a global strategy of analysis, prevention, and management of cyber a©acks.
Since September 2016 the Cyber Security unit has been operating within Global Digital Solutions, repoing directly to the Chief Information O¢cer (CIO) who works under the Group Chief Information Security Ocer (CISO). The unit is responsible for guaranteeing the governance, coordination and control of cyber security issues, denition of strategy, policies, and guidelines in accordance with national and international standards, providing engineering suppo to protect the Group's areas of operation, and monitoring the risk posture by pe¥orming checks based on processes and technology. The unit works synergically with the Business Lines and with the technical units responsible for systems design and management, thanks to the Cyber Security Risk Managers and Cyber Security Response Managers. CISO and the Cyber Security Risk Managers also constitute the Cyber Security Operating Commi©ee, the aims of which are to evaluate the cyber risk across the business in order to dene the risk acceptance criteria based on the Group risk posture, and to standardize the entire process. The Cyber Security Commi¡ee, chaired by Enel's Chief Executive Ocer and composed of his main front lines, approves the cyber security strategy and periodically checks its progress.
Each Group area depament paicipates actively in implementing the cyber security strategy by means of an integrated operating plan aligned with the Group's objectives.

Cyber security strategy and initiatives are recurring topics subject to the oversight of the Group's principal executive and control bodies (e.g. Board of Directors, Control and Risks Commi©ee, Supervisory Bodies, etc.).
In 2017 the Company also set up a specic "Cyber Security Framework" policy, which orients principles and operating processes for a global risk analysis, prevention and management strategy.
The framework is based on a "systemic" vision that integrates the sector of conventional Information Technology (IT) with that of Operational Technology (OT), linked to the world of industry, and with the Internet of Things (IoT). In dening this framework, the new Cyber Security Risk Management methodology was established in 2017; the methodology is applicable to all IT, OT and IoT environments and it describes all the phases required to carry out a risk analysis and dene the related mitigation plan, in line with the stated cyber security goals. Enel has also created a "Cyber Emergency Readiness Team" (CERT) for proactive management and response to cyber incidents while collaborating and exchanging information within a network of accredited international paners. Since 2019, a new agreement has been established with USA national CERT; this aliation brings the number of accreditations at 9: Romania, Italy, Chile, Argentina, Peru, Colombia, Brazil, Spain, and the US.
Enel CERT is also an accredited member of Trusted Introducer, which includes more than 380 CERTs in more than 60 countries. In September 2018 Enel also joined FIRST (Forum of Incident Response and Security Teams), which is the largest and most widespread community in the sector, with over 510 members in more than 90 countries.

The cyber security strategy denes objectives and priorities, in order to address and coordinate initiatives and investment activities for the Enel Group considered globally, and to guarantee compliance with cyber security policies, targets denition, managerial repoing, and continuous monitoring of security initiatives in progress.
This process is guided by CISO and it uses close integration and synergy with the various business areas, which communicate their needs, share training, analyze oppounities, manage any criticalities, and make proposals for initiatives. Specically, strategy denition is an iterative activity based on sharing and consolidation of the Group's risk posture target. The various actors involved analyze the options and potential initiatives within their respective business areas in order to assess the feasibility, guarantee consensus, and the necessary funds. The Cyber Security unit guides the process and, together with the other actors involved, gradually consolidates aspects such as future scenario, objectives, and possible strategic initiatives in a cyber security strategy proposal document, with a high level budget estimate and denition of priorities.
The cyber security topic is also on the agenda of managerial meetings (such as business reviews, operational review meetings) and meetings of the control commi©ees (such as the Control and Risks Commi©ee).
Inclusion is a daily challenge, especially in an increasingly digitalized world. Several months ago, a dedicated telephone help desk was placed at the disposal of colleagues with disabilities, including temporary disabilities, who use assistive technologies and software, oering assistance with their technical and practical needs. Assistance service key 0 is available for all requirements of our people. Pressing this key provides access to a specialist service dedicated to managing diculties with the assistive technologies and software employed. The service is manned by a team with specialized skills in compliance with international guidelines and standards.
The multiplicity and complexity of the areas in which Enel operates (data, industry, and people) and of the technological components (e.g. business critical systems such as SCADA - Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition, sma grids and sma meters), which are increasingly integrated in the Group's digital life, have made it necessary to con gure a structured cyber security system. This leads to the need for a new cyber defense model based on a systemic vision that integrates the IT sector (staing from the cloud down to the data center and mobile phone), the OT (everything concerning industrial sector, such as generation plant remote control) and the IoT (Internet of Things, the extension of communication and intelligence to the world of things).
Through the risk monitoring systems CERT collects more than 2 billion events daily from more than 3,700 sources of data concerning corporate assets, correlates them by exploiting automatic analysis techniques, and produces around one hundred "incidents". The incidents are classi ed according to the Enel Cyber Impact Matrix on a scale of 0 to 4, making use of the best events correlation capabilities emerging from the adoption of highly advanced services.
The vast majority of "incidents" are classied at level 0/1; they have no signicant impact on Group systems and are automatically or semi-automatically blocked and/or managed by the existing company defenses, preventing and/or mitigating the impact of potential cyber a©acks.
Incidents classied at levels 2/3/4 have a potential impact on the Group and are managed by CERT analysts, involving any aected stakeholders. Thanks to the protection services, CERT intercepts 1.7 million at-risk emails, 325 viruses, 154 web poal a¡acks, and 474 thousand connections to harmful websites every day.
If a cyber security incident involves a possible data breach, the appropriate and necessary actions are taken immediately, in line with the specic Group policy on "Personal Data Breach Management". If a crisis situation should arise that threatens the company's business continuity and/or the assets, reputation, and/or protability of the Enel Group, the appropriate actions are taken immediately, in line with the specic Group policy on "Critical events management". In 2020 Enel CERT responded to: 140 cyber security incidents with impact level 2; around 40 incidents with impact level 3; 3 incidents with the highest impact level of 4. The 3 level 4 incidents are illustrated below.
In all cases detected, all the procedures dened for incidents and critical events management were activated in order to allow an ecient and quick response, so to minimize impacts on people, services and assets.
Paicularly, when a cyber security incident result in a potential data breach, the necessary actions are immediately undeaken, in line with Enel Group policy "Personal Data Breach Management".
In 2019 migration of applications to the IaaS cloud was achieved for the entire scope of Enel applications; this implies that all Enel web poals leverage on enhanced cyber security solutions too. For this reason, the number of "Internet web applications protected by advanced cyber security solutions", considered in percentage terms, stands at 100%.
In March 2020 we also published the "IT Service Continuity Management" Policy, in order to formalize an adequate process and reduce the risk aecting the availability of IT infrastructure to an acceptable level, suppo business

continuity requirements, and guarantee restoration of IT services based on the results deriving from a Business Impact Analysis, in the event of the occurrence of a severe interruption.
In 2021, the number of viruses and connections to dangerous sites may change due to the adoption, at the end of 2020, of two new strategic business security technologies, a global detection and response system (EDR – Endpoint Detection & Response) and a new global solution to protect from outbound connections to harmful websites. In line with the approach already developed in 2019 in relation to the protection of web poals, these new tools provide upgraded functionalities and use innovative paradigms such as embedded analysis modules based on machine learning algorithms. Moreover, by using new functions supplied by reinforced security solutions, the Cyber Security unit can now link multiple a©ack evidences to the same malevolent activity.
No cases of nonconformity with cyber security standards and regulations were recorded in 2020.

| Incidents and breaches | 2020 |
|---|---|
| Number of information security breaches or other cyber 21 security incidents Total amount (in euros) of nes/penalties incurred in rela tion to information security breaches or other cyber se 0 curity incidents Total number of security breaches of involving customers' |
|
| 12 | |
| personal identication information |
Breaches involving customers and the related information on nes/penalties are managed in Enel by the DPO structure.
(1) The number refers to cyber incidents.
(2) The number refers to an incident that cannot be deemed to be due to a cyber a©ack

All cyber security projects, programs, and initiatives are designed to avoid, mitigate or remediate IT security risks for the entire Enel Group. Consequently, all cyber security activities – managed with a risk-based approach following the security by design principle – give rise to a continuous due diligence process that also includes self-assurance activities.
The most impoant projects in this area include:
In line with the Open Power vision, Enel has made its experience available to increase security of the ecosystem and has forged relations with the academic world and institutional actors to organize courses and round tables aimed at identifying talents with an interest in cyber security topics. 2020 was also accompanied by numerous collaborations with institutional paners and interventions at high pro le national and international conferences, pursued in order to maintain an active role in the industry international community, sharing the Enel cyber security model. In this context, Enel took pa in the Conndustria Digitale team, which was formed to assist the development of the Italian digital ecosystem.
Enel paicipates in World Economic Forum work groups and, in December 2020, contributed to the publication of the repo entitled "Cyber Resilience in the Electricity Ecosystem: Securing the Value Chain", aimed at developing guidelines and proposals concerning the responsibility model in the context of the electricity industry value chain for the supply of products, design of solutions, and phases of commissioning and operation. In addition, paicipation in the "World Economic Forum's Systems of Cyber Resilience: Electricity" project led to the publication of the repo entitled "Cyber Resilience in the Electricity Industry: Analysis and Recommendations on Regulatory Practices for the Public and Private Sectors" in July 2020. The goal of this repo was to provide recommendations for policy makers and companies to improve cyber resilience in the electricity industry.
The Company pressed ahead with its commitment to disseminating the "cyber security culture" and in 2020 16 cyber security knowledge sharing events took place. After the rst launch at the end of 2015, the Cyber Security Awareness Program has become a constant and ongoing initiative at Group level, responsible for disseminating the cyber security culture in order to raise awareness of threats and a©acks that exploit the human vector.
One of the main factors that guided and fuher strengthened a large number of cyber security awareness and communication initiatives in 2020 was the emergency situation caused by the Covid-19 pandemic. During emergencies it is extremely impoant to raise people's a©ention levels to ensure they do not fall prey to a©acks by hackers and fraudsters. On the other hand, exposure to cyber risks is now even greater, because tens of thousands of Enel people have been operating in sma working mode, using their home broadband network to access Enel's servers. This results in the need to focus a©ention on working methods and equipment protection in order to guarantee security of the Company and its assets and avoid compromising business continuity. In paicular, bulletins and newsle©ers have been created and distributed via the corporate Intranet and a series of documents have been made available to spread up-to-date information on cyber security topics and initiatives.


The past year also saw the release of the "Rules of Behavior for Digital People" policy, an aiculated code of conduct addressed to all Enel people, to safeguard their digital identity, allow them to act safely in the world of social media and, when necessary, send notications concerning potential incidents and request assistance.
Another development was the launch of the Open Tech Journey project, aimed at providing access to training courses focused on technological topics, promoting internal skills to spread awareness of strategic topics and to manage upskilling and reskilling requirements. This was the background to the creation of the Cyber School, which delivered eight "fundamentals" courses on the main cyber security topics. The rst courses edition was delivered in a viual classroom (four courses in 2020 and the remaining four in 2021). All the courses will be re-designed in 2021 in order to deliver them in e-learning mode.

| Activities | 2020-2022 targets | 2020 results | Status | 2021-2023 targets | Tag | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Priorities Economic and €nancial F value creation |
Plan Growth accelerators |
SDG | business areas | Definition and application of suitable industrial and financial circularity metrics to support and enhance circular economy activities, engaging the respective |
• KPIs set to monitor CE initiatives; dashboard for CEO Business Review; KPIs for Market • Collaboration with the Ellen MacArthur Foundation for the development of Circulytics |
ON-PLAN | • Start of data collection for Group financial/industrial KPIs • Consolidation and adoption of potential other Business Line/ Country-specific KPIs in 2021 • Definition of the Group's financial/industrial objectives on the circular economy in 2022 |
I E |
||||
| Innovation and digital N transformation |
Target | Strengthening of partnerships and collaborations | ON-PLAN | Strengthening partnerships and collaborations with |
E G |
|||||||
| Activities 2020-2022 targets • Development of Circular Community activities • Starting of the Circular Academy • Promotion of the culture and best practices of a circular economy at Global Business Line, Global Procurement and Country level |
2020 results Circular Community: ongoing activities in Chile, Colombia, Peru, Spain, Italy; webinars carried out to share projects Circular Economy School: three editions held for about 180 'student' colleagues Practice sharing: platform set up for internal sharing of |
Status ON-PLAN |
2021-2023 targets Target exceeded and merged into new objectives |
Tag I E |
SDG | Equipment Coalition; Circular Electronics Partnership; Italian Circular Economy Stakeholder Platform; expert group on financing the circular economy; European Remanufacturing Council • Extension of the circular economy alliance and partici pation in the WBCSD Built Environment Working Group |
international networks, companies from other sectors, external players focused on the development of "circular cities" |
|||||
| projects and best practices Communication and culture: internal communication campaign and the creation of the eCircular platform to raise awareness on the topic among Enel's people |
Improving circularity3 | 86% by 2030 | I E |
|||||||||
| Development of internal skills, culture and know how on the circular economy |
Training activities, CE community development, internal communication and sharing of best practices |
I E S |
||||||||||
| Denition and implementation of circular economy solutions in collaboration with the various business areas |
Circular economy solutions developed at Global Business Line / Country level and in cross-cuŽing areas |
ON-PLAN | Definition and application of circular economy solutions and new business models focused on key technologies1 |
I E |
Stepping up the sharing of best practices and knowledge on the circular economy with external stakeholders |
Collaboration by drafting position papers, taking part in working groups, and through dissemination activities |
I E S G |
|||||
| Creation of an ecosystem dedicated to the topic of circular economy in the most relevant countries where the Company operates |
Initiatives developed to drive the transition to circularity at national level (Argentina, Brazil, Chile, Colombia, Italy, Peru, Spain, United States2 ) |
ON-PLAN | Target exceeded and merged into new objectives |
I E |
Engaging with start-ups | Engaging with startups to accelerate the transition to the circular economy |
I E G T |
Global Energy and Commodity Management
O perating in a sustainable way is a priority for us, and we place the environment and people at the center of our development model. We have moved along this pathway by integrating circular management into our activities.
We have been operating for some time now with the aim of developing business and achieving results with the full involvement of our stakeholders. Our commitment to circularity is a further step in this direction.
Manage energy and commodities by focusing on the sustainability of what we do, in order to ensure development and results.
Management systems in common among multiple users of products, assets, or skills.
The growing penetration of renewable sources, together with greater use of the electric carrier by our customers, is capable of boosting oppounities deriving from the circular economy and represents the only path towards the decarbonization of the economy and the society in which we live at the speed we need, considering the critical environmental situation of the planet. According to recent studies, the circular economy can contribute up to almost half the global eo toward reaching the decarbonization objectives. The European Union has given a strong impulse toward regulating the circular economy and subsequently, also other governments, cities and territories on all continents have staed to develop these issues. Enel actively paicipates in the discussion on every institutional level, from supernational to local, in order to suppo this transition both in terms of vision and content and in terms of design.
Forward looking companies in all sectors have embraced this visions in the last years. Enel staed down this path many years ago, and now the circular economy represents a true strategic driver in Enel's business as well as a growth accelerator along the entire value chain.
Rethinking the business model from a circular point of view is rst of all a challenge not only in terms of technological innovation but also in terms of collaborating in an increasingly close manner with our own ecosystem.
Approach to the design and management of an asset or product in order to extend its useful life, e.g. through modular design, facilitated reparability, or predictive maintenance. Product as a service maintenance.

Business model in which the customer purchases a service for a limited time, while the company maintains the propeies of the product, maximizing the utilization factor and useful life. Shared product, maximizing the utilization factor and useful life.
To reduce the consumption of non-renewable materials and energies, we need to act on one hand on the resources used as input, switching from resources from non-renewable sources to renewable sources or recycled input, and on the other hand on models of reuse, sharing or product as a service (PaaS), regenerate or recycle.
Any solution to preserve the value of an asset at the end of a life cycle through reuse, regeneration, upcycling or recycling, in conjunction with the other pillars. cycle through reuse, regeneration, upcycling or recycling, in conjunction with the other pillars.
Production and use model based on renewable inputs or previous life cycles (reuse and recycling). renewable inputs or previous life cycles (reuse and recycling).
Enel's approach for the circular economy is extremely open and transversal, and recognizes that innovation plays a central role that is not limited to technical aspects, but concerns all dimensions of our business: technology, business models, contractual frameworks, collaborations along the internal and external value chain, regulatory and institutional context, etc.
› is not just a topic of environmental management, but much more than this: it concerns redesigning the entire



economic model and therefore transversal governance is needed with respect to economic and environmental areas, on every level (from institutional to corporate);
The circular economy makes it possible to switch from a model based on the consumption of environmental resources, with the increasing contribution of automation, to a model based on maintaining the value of products and goods, where human work can have an increasingly relevant role.
The main potential social impacts are:
extension
platforms
New life cycles
Approach to the design and
management of an asset or product in order to extend its useful life, e.g.
Business model in which the



1 2 3 4
At a Glance Our ESG peormance Trend Topic Appendix
The success of this transition also requires the denition of an eective governance. The circular economy is a transversal topic and is not associated with only one area, rather it is an approach to be adopted in all lines of business. For this reason, it is of fundamental impoance for this approach to be coordinated regarding the strategy, context, skills and that it suppos every sta and business area for its eective adoption.
For this purpose, specic areas have been created in Enel in various Business Lines and various Countries which are coordinated by a Holding area. In paicular, whereas the Business Lines redesign or develop business models from a point of view of the circular economy, the units on a country level provide suppo locally to the development of business oppounities, with considerable collaboration with the local ecosystem.
In order to apply a circular approach in a systematic manner, Enel is working in a transversal and integrated manner in all of its business areas and involving suppliers and customers. This results in a structured and eective approach so they can redesign their own model. For this purpose, the main areas of activity concern the following aspects.
The Circular Procurement strategy that Enel is promoting is divided into the following steps:
The circular approach is applied along all the main phases of the life of the assets (power plants, electrical grids, etc.): from the planning (design and input material selections), implementation (management of construction site phases) and operation (maintenance oriented toward extending their useful life) up to decommissioning (management of areas, equipment, materials and infrastructures in order to identify new life cycles through reuse, upcycling, remanufacturing, recycling, etc.).
Various strategies are being dened for managing assets from a circular point of view, and taking the specic aspects of the various assets into account, also considering the secondary raw materials that can be recovered and identifying more ecient valorization methods, both within the Company and in other markets.
Generation
The photovoltaic value chain is currently being redesigned – on the one hand by working on the circularity of the input materials (by evaluating the use of materials such as recycled plastic) and on the other by identifying solutions that maximize the recovered value at the end of their service life.
Fuhermore, in order to make the wind supply chain more circular, innovative technologies are being evaluated for the recovery of the wind blades at the end of their service life, also by exploring cross-sectoral collaborations, such as the possibility of reusing the recovered material in the construction sector.
The application of sustainability and circular economy approaches to the decommissioning of coal-red plants has generated environmental and economic benets. The "Spare pas and equipment New Life" project, which was launched in February 2020, has precisely the objective of giving new life to the components in the warehouses and to the equipment of the coal-red power plants being de-

commissioned and to obsolete material from all the other thermal power plants.
This has been made possible by the identied and de ned target options, i.e. ve business models based on the principles of the circular economy: reuse, resale, donation, recycle and, if applicable, in-house Enel projects.
As of today, the project perimeter includes materials in the warehouse and equipment (components) from ve countries – Italy, Spain, Russia, Chile and Argentina – and 14 plants.
The main oppounities that have been completed include, for example, the in-house reuse of various materials and components in Italy, Spain and Chile. This has made it possible to obtain, in addition to benets in terms of sustainability and circular economy, a total value of avoided costs equal to approximately 1.4 million euros.
Fuhermore, sales initiatives have been staed with third paies, for example for material in the R-GRES warehouse in Russia and in the coal mills of Teruel in Spain.
There are many oppounities in the pipeline, which cover all ve business models; their activation is therefore the objective of the program for the upcoming months. Progress is measured by ad hoc indicators that have been de ned for the project and are periodically monitored.
ww
The value chain of the grid assets is currently being analyzed, with the objective of creating long-term value by focusing on two main levers: regeneration of end-of-life asset materials and introduction of a circular approach during the design phase. In 2020, experiments were completed for the regeneration of the plastic coming from decommissioned counters to be used for the production of new counters, and an analogous process was developed in Brazil. Experiments were also staed regarding the regeneration of the materials of other grid assets (for example, the suppos for the electrical infrastructure and the boxes for the electronic counters).
Enel has embarked on a challenging path aimed at redesigning the value chain by adopting a circular economy model in order to reduce environmental impacts by maximizing the recovery of end-of-life products and materials.
With the progress in Italy of the plan to replace 32 million rst generation meters, Enel has decided to transform their disposal into an oppounity by using the material originating from the counters being decommissioned to make the new "Circular Open Meter".
When developing this device, a process was pe¥ected for the selection and regeneration of the polycarbonate taken from the meters being decommissioned, which can be replicated in the future in all countries of the Group, if the physical and mechanical characteristics of the recycled plastic material permit doing so. In June 2020, the NMi Ceication Body (Nederlands Meetinstituut) for the MID Directive (Measuring In order to stimulate the market toward higher standards that can be both an example and a driver for other companies, both suppliers and customers, Enel X provides innovative advisory tools capable of guiding companies and public administrations in dening and implementing sustainability programs. The entire process, which is unique in its completeness and innovativeness, is called the "Enel X Circular Economy Boosting Program", precisely to underline and emphasize the acceleration/boost aspect and therefore the dynamism and commitment that the entire company constantly demonstrates to pursue its sustainability and circular economy objectives. The advisory service, which suppos the recovery of Italian companies and public administrations, includes the following tools.
During 2020 approximately 50 Circular Economy Client Repos were completed, which supplied customer companies with solutions for generated savings on a yearly basis of more than 7,000 tons of CO2 and 10 GWh of en-

Instruments Directive) approved the use of the regenerated plastic for the Open Meter. With this ceication, which guarantees the quality of the regeneration process, production staed for the rst batch of the 30 thousand Circular Open Meters.
Made of 100% regenerated plastic, the new counters make it possible to minimize the environmental impact to the bene t of customers, the territory and the environment. In particular, with the application of the "Life Cycle Assessment", a standardized assessment method on an international level that quanties the impact of a ceain product on the environment, it was estimated that for the rst batch there was a reduction of 210 tons of CO2 emi¡ed as compared to the traditional process. Fuhermore, thanks to the reinseion of the waste material of the old devices in the production process of the new Circular Open Meters (mainly plastic), also a reduction of 31.5 tons of waste was estimated.
In percentage terms, 48% of the new meters by weight is made of regenerated materials. It is also estimated that 79% by weight of the Circular Open Meter (in addition to plastic, also the metals and steel) can be recycled at the end of their service life1 .
The Circular Open Meter is therefore a pe¥ect example of the circular economy, a large step forward toward an industrial model that is increasingly sustainable, innovative and ecient along the entire value chain.
ergy. In Italy, impoant panerships were established with the main bodies and strategic companies that represent the territory. The objective is to transfer knowledge about the circular economy as a sustainable business model able to generate oppounities that are economically advantageous and competitive, both for the territory and for customer and paner companies internationally.
To accompany the public administration toward a more sustainable and circular approach, Enel X has developed an assessment model that aims to evaluate the level of circular maturity of municipalities and identify a series of solutions to implement within a roadmap of concrete interventions that have an impact on the territory. This assessment is pe¥ormed on both levels of analysis: on a level of the entire urban/city perimeter and on the level of one or more specic sites (buildings and public structures) with a focus on energy circularity.

Customers are involved, on the one hand, by oering them products and services that are increasingly circular and, on the other, as regards industrial customers and the public administration, by suppoing them in measuring and improving their own circularity.
Enel X oers innovative products and services, promoting
the electrication of consumption and the transition toward renewable energy in areas such as electric mobility, heating/cooling, grid exibility, etc. Fuhermore, with the Circular Economy Boosting Program, which is a continuous measurement and improvement process, Enel X makes the solutions in its pofolio increasingly circular. Similarly, Enel X suppos industrial customers and the public administration with the Circular Economy Repo, which measures their circularity and denes a roadmap for improving it.
(1) Hypothesis: 90% recycling rate of the polycarbonate used as input; 95% recycling rate for the end-of-life materials (polycarbonate, steel, copper, polyamide, others such as silicon and aluminium).
For cities, the assessment covers ve survey areas: circular economy, energy, mobility, waste and emissions. Each of these areas is assessed based on four dimensions and specic indicators associated with them, which are useful for identifying the level of circular maturity of a city:
Fuhermore, in order to automate it and make it even more usable, both for large urban centers and small cities, the model is currently being updated thanks to active collaboration with academic and institutional paners. In this way, it will be possible to fuher extend the area of analysis, adding new areas and indicators and including new data sources, comprehensive of those available via open data.
As instead regards products, the staing point for the Circular Economy Boosting Program is the Circular Economy Score, which allows the degree of circularity of the solutions in the pofolio to be measured. Each product and the upstream and downstream supply chain can in fact be assessed based on parameters of the circularity assessment metrics. This obtains a "product score" that serves two functions: on the one hand to calculate the environmental impact and dene possible improvements to the production cycle, on the other to measure the eectiveness of the proposed change. The obtained score is then used as the staing point for applying the Circular Economy Boosting Program and increasing the circular maturity of the product through "product innovation" and "redesign" processes, in order to increase the level of circularity and sustainability. An example of an Enel X product for which the Boosting Program was applied is the device for charging electric vehicles for private individuals, the Juice Box. Juice box and the circular economy
The application of the principles of the circular economy to the production cycle can provide a considerable contribution to the adoption of behaviors that are more responsible with respect to the planet. An emblematic case of a product score with the aim of improving its sustainability is that of the Juice Box, the latest proposal of Enel X for charging electric vehicles for homes and companies. The Circular Economy Boosting Program was able to identify the lever for increasing the level of circularity of the product and, at the same time, combat pollution created by the plastic used to make the encasing of the small charging station. The procurement of the virgin plastic was replaced by recycled plastic, with the identication of new suitable suppliers and designing and implementing an innovative product inspired by the principles of circularity. After the tests con rmed the results in terms of pe¥ormance comparable to what was obtained using virgin plastic, at the end of 2020 the rst 3 thousand Juice Boxes saw the light of day. In 2021, in Europe only, more than 30 thousand new Boxes will be produced, therefore using approximately 62 tons of plastic waste for their manufacturing, with an additional roll-out already planned in other Countries and Regions.

One of the main challenges for the true adoption of a circular economy model is the denition of criteria and reference metrics on an international level that make it possible to distinguish between circular and non-circular solutions, measure the impacts, dene the objectives and understand the improvement levers.
Enel measures the economic pe¥ormance of the new initiatives of all the Business Lines through a periodic metric presented to top management, which measures the environmental impacts and economic pe¥ormance dierentials of this new focus. In paicular, a rst set of indicators, which are more operative, is used to monitor the activities and initiatives developed on a Business Line as well as a country level. In parallel, an integrated Group process is being developed in order to measure the material and energy parameters related to the ve pillars of the circular economy, in physical and economic terms.
About four years ago, Enel developed and pe¥ected a conceptual model for dening the measurement of the circularity of its business, and made it public online to spread the knowledge and promote the adoption of circular economy models.
The model, which is called the CirculAbility Model, denes the ve pillars of circularity in a quantitative manner and simultaneously manages both the material component and the energy component, providing a single circularity indicator2 .
The digital area is a fundamental pa of the Company and represents a circularity enabler. By developing initiatives for the circular management of IT assets (for example, extension of the useful life and reuse of the devices) as well as other digital solutions that enable and accelerate circular business models (for example, machine learning techniques intended for predictive maintenance, digital management of information about materials, etc.).

(2) h©ps://corporate.enel.it/en/circular-economy-sustainable-future/performance-indicators.
The model has been shared with other industry operators, competitors and institutions, to provide a proactive contribution to the dialog. In coherence with the Group's vision, specic approaches have been developed for the various targets:
In order to measure the circularity of its activities in a precise manner, the Group is increasingly focused on analyzing the evolution of the consumption of resources associated with its business activities.
In line with the productivity indicators of the resources, also provided by Eurostat, we measure the consumption of material for its entire life considering the whole value chain. As regards the generation capacities, this involves measuring the consumption of resources over the entire life in connection to a power plant: from the extracted raw materials, to the consumed materials and the energy used during the phases of manufacturing, construction, operation and decommissioning. This aggregated value is then compared with the energy produced over the entire life. This indicator, on an aggregate level, was presented at Capital Markets Day 2020, and was dened a target for 2030 for improving circularity by 86% in comparison to 2015 in terms of consumption for the entire useful life of the materials and fuels for the generation capacity (the value achieved in 2020 was 54%).
The objective is to more deeply analyze these impacts by technological supply chain, in order to progressively reduce the Group's impact on the consumption of resources, tracking the individual materials in an increasingly detailed manner. This represents a fundamental step for ensuring that the transition toward renewable energies and electrication of nal demand does not generate in turn new environmental, social and procurement challenges related to the utilized materials.
The systematic development of these analyses makes a bottom-up aggregation possible to improve the overall impact in terms of Group resources as regards the activities carried out.
The circular economy is closely connected to the creation of not only environmental value, but also economic value; it is also measurable in a quantitative manner and therefore can permit a connection between industrial and nancial metrics. These hybrid metrics are being dened, also sharing the approaches with various stakeholders inside and outside the Company, and precisely dening the development criteria in compliance with various international forums regarding sustainable nance.
In general, circular EBITDA takes 3 categories into consideration:
In line with the Group CirculAbility Model, the levers to use concern both the ows of material and energy (circular ow, both input and output) as well as the business models (extension of the useful life, PaaS, sharing).
The three categories can overlap: for example, the sector of renewable energy can be put in the Circular P&S category, but, if also the entire supply chain – from materials to installation and decommissioning – is inseed in a circular point of view, therefore it can also be put in the Circular VC category.

Enel already staed working on the topic of circular cities many years ago, with the awareness that the evolution of the cities cannot be approached only from the point of view of individual technologies or individual sectors, but requires a transversal vision, a clear denition of the economic, environmental and social objectives as well as open governance. Cities are responsible for approximately 80% of global GDP, and are also the areas where the global challenges are most critical, because they contribute to more than two thirds of emissions and the world-wide consumption of natural resources. Therefore they represent a laboratory for the de nition and implementation of solutions that provide a concrete contribution to the solution to the global challenges. With its vision of the circular city, Enel has discussed and collaborated with associations and companies in other sectors to dene the context within which it can make its contribution. When expanding upon this viewpoint, technologies still maintain a central role; for example infrastructure is an aspect that permeates all the areas: sma grid, sma lighting, pos, ber optics. New technologies play a key role, as well as the most impoant renewable technologies and IoT (Internet of Things) solutions: they represent a new paradigm able to eliminate global and local pollution
emi©ed by current technologies and improve the quality of life of citizens.
Enel has contributed to this design not only in terms of business solutions and services, but also with theoretic thinking, for creating awareness and for sharing ideas on this topic. Three years ago, Enel published its rst position paper on circular cities, with the study reaching its third edition in 2020, which has placed emphasis on a key topic for the eective and organic implementation of the circular economy: public-private collaboration (h©ps://www. enel.com/content/dam/enel-com/documenti/media/paper-circular-cities-2020.pdf).
A circularity-based business model implies the utmost collaboration between all actors involved; that's why we consider it essential to open up to dialogue with paies who share this vision, involving the supply chains and promoting common initiatives to safeguard natural resources and boost competitiveness of the ecosystem.
It is not possible to search for a circular solution only within a company or its business sectors, rather it is necessary


to also explore synergies with other sectors with which the company never worked together historically.
For example, for this purpose Enel is commi©ed to a global initiative after joining the Capital Equipment Coalition, which is a coalition of leading companies on the topic of the circular economy.
Fuhermore, for this purpose, in 2017 Enel, together with many other "Made in Italy" companies in various sectors, launched the Circular Economy Alliance.
Another key element for suppoing the creation of a circular ecosystem is the paicipation in international networks in order to contribute toward the discussion regarding how to accelerate the transition toward a circular economy, sharing the best practices and identifying possible synergies and collaborations. With this objective, Enel is pa of various networks, such as:
The active paicipation in these networks, in combination with a collaborative approach with the external world and with a focus on co-innovation with our suppliers and customers, is of fundamental impoance in order to create an innovative ecosystem with the objective of making the various value chains more circular.
A transformation like the one represented by the transition toward a circular economy model requires a commitment also in terms of skills, work methods, integration.
Enel has made a strong commitment to promoting the cul ture of circularity, both within the Company and externally. Therefore, we make use of our experience and our knowledge on this topic to create informational and educational content to share with stakeholders both inside and outside the Com pany. Inside the Company, Enel educates its employees and spreads the circular economy through instructional and train ing activities, such as the online course on the circular econ omy as well as ad hoc training sessions for specic functions that play a role in key activities related to the circular economy. For this purpose, a Group Circular Economy School was es tablished, which involved approximately 180 Enel people dur ing 2020 in Europe and Latin America over a period of two weeks per edition. The paicipation and topics faced were intentionally transversal with respect to the professional areas in order to promote comparison and rethinking in as broad a manner as possible. All business areas and sta Functions paicipated in addressing technological, process, business model, contractual, regulatory, institutional topics, etc.
Fuhermore, various communities were created to suppo the activities and promote the culture and best practices of circular economy across all areas.
An additional impoant element was the launch of the e-cir cular platform, which is an in-house company platform with the objective of suppoing the development of the "circular" behavior of people, therefore also projecting what the Group is facing in business onto a personal level. Colleagues can use the platform to make their skills available (for example for language exchange), oer goods or search for items. Fuher more, the platform represents a focal point for all the circular culture initiatives promoted in Enel through information, news and multimedia content regarding the circular economy.
An additional innovative element was the creation of a Busi ness Simulation Game session, in which Enel people in the various countries tested their knowledge about transforming a business from linear to circular by acquiring new levers. Circular is Cool is the name of the project that Enel X has created for schools, together with Humans to Humans. Con tributing toward the creation of a culture of sustainability and circularity means, in fact, also teaching the new generations to respect the planet, our home. The educational project in volves approximately 1,000 students from ten middle schools in seven Italian regions, and includes a cycle of three online tutorials, thanks to which the paicipants will be able to learn about the principles that are at the basis of the circular econ omy model and its concrete applications, for example in the mobility sector, listening directly to the managers themselves. Finally, Enel puts young talents to the test regarding the circu lar economy and innovation with two programs, PlayEnergy and We are Energy, which have the objective of developing and enhancing young talents.
PlayEnergy is directed outside the Company, involving young innovators between the ages of 7 and 18 in the search for solutions for a be©er future, using their creativity and their imagination. The 2020 edition actively involved more than 7,500 young people from Italy, Brazil and Greece. We are En ergy is instead a program intended exclusively for the children of colleagues in all the countries where we operate between ages of 7 and 18. The 2020 edition, which was called Reci proCity, focused on the circular, inclusive and sustainable city, with the paicipation of more than two thousand young peo ple from 16 countries.
| Activities 2020-2022 targets |
2020 results | Status | 2021-2023 targets | Tag | SDG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Integration of the Environmental Product Declaration (EPD) and launch of co-innovation projects |
Integration of the EPD qualification requirement and subsequent launch of co-innovation projects |
E | |||
| • Increase and strengthening of tender strategies in which assessment of the K technical factor includes sustainability aspects • Start of actions aimed at sharing best practices throughout the entire perimeter of Enel |
• Published the OP 1684 procedure "K Sustainability and other commitments process management" • Sharepoint created for data collection • Integrated the automatic tool on the WeBUY platform • Published the "Sustainability K Library" on the shared portal and launched training between Procurement and Business Lines |
ON-PLAN | • Increase and strengthening of tender strategies in which assessment of the K technical factor includes sustainability aspects • Start of actions aimed at sharing best practices throughout the entire perimeter of Enel |
||
| • Promotion of activities of information and benchmarking with suppliers • Development of projects in line with the principles of the circular economy, in order to achieve a "zero waste" approach and then extend it to the business activities • Activity of training of the employees of Global Procurement on sustainability topics |
• Vendor Days and remote workshops held • Launch of the "Circular Procurement" strategy (including the K factor, EPD and co innovation); circular economy sessions held; including circular K factors and circular factors for planning procurement procedures • Training activities carried out in the field of sustainability, K factors and Circular Economy School |
ON-PLAN | • Promotion of activities of information and benchmarking with suppliers • Development of projects in line with the principles of the circular economy, in order to achieve a "zero waste" approach and then extend it to the business activities • Activity of training of the employees of Global Procurement on sustainability topics |
||
| Continual increase in the coverage rate of "sustain ability K" tenders (% of "sustainability K" tenders out of total tenders) |
80% by 2023 | ||||
| Definition of a single sustainability index for suppliers |
Definition of a single sustainability index for Enel's supplier ranking in 2022 |

| Integration of the EPD qualification requirement and subsequent launch of co-innovation projects |
E | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| ON-PLAN | • Increase and strengthening of tender strategies in which assessment of the K technical factor includes sustainability aspects • Start of actions aimed at sharing best practices throughout the entire perimeter of Enel |
||
| ON-PLAN | • Promotion of activities of information and benchmarking with suppliers • Development of projects in line with the principles of the circular economy, in order to achieve a "zero waste" approach and then extend it to the business activities • Activity of training of the employees of Global Procurement on sustainability topics |
||
| 80% by 2023 | |||
| Definition of a single sustainability index for Enel's supplier ranking in 2022 |
102-15

(1) The percentage is calculated considering the total number of qualied suppliers with qualication valid within the year and does not include large players or subsidiaries of related industrial groups.
A sustainable and resilient supply chain is essential in order to achieve our decarbonization and electrication objectives.
Our purchasing processes are based on pre-contractual and contractual conduct geared towards mutual loyalty, transparency and collaboration. In addition to ensuring the necessary quality standards, supplier pe¥ormance must go hand in hand with the commitment to adopt best practices in terms of human rights, working conditions, occupational health and safety, and environmental responsibility. The Code of Ethics, Zero Tolerance of Corruption Plan Zero Tolerance of Corruption Plan, Policy on Human Rights, Model pursuant to Legislative Decree 231/01 and the Enel Global Compliance Program all underpin our purchasing activities and serve as a guide and code of conduct for suppliers.
SUSTAINABLE
SUPPLY CHAIN 24,012 SUPPLIERS
with which a new contract was signed during the year
motion of sustainable development and social stability. In terms of environmental sustainability and reducing paper usage, the Group promotes digital processes for the qualication/registration of suppliers, tender management and the issue of contracts.
103-2 103-3
We adopt a structured approach to analyzing and monitoring the procurement process, in order to ensure that the best paners are selected and that contracts are executed to the highest sustainability standards.
In paicular, risk assessments are carried out for all categories of purchased products. The main risks identied relate to economic, environmental and social aspects as well as to integrity.
83% of Tier 1 suppliers (approximately 12 thousand1 ) are deemed critical, considering their strategic impoance to the business, purchase volumes and potential economic,
75 %
7,050 CONTRACTORS MONITORED with Supplier Pe¥ormance Management
Global Procurement
B y encouraging our suppliers to improve their transparency and competences, we will be able to objectively quantify the impacts generated in the entire life cycle of supplies and services and share future commitments for their reduction.
Francesca Di Carlo
We promote long-term panerships with our suppliers, managing relations with them in a transparent, collaborative and open manner. The traditional measure of supply chain eectiveness, namely cost savings, is now accompanied by other metrics that seek to maximize value creation in its various forms (safety, time, quality, pe¥ormance, revenue, exibility, risk reduction).
The strategy is essentially based on three cornerstones:
Procurement processes are carried out in compliance with the applicable local laws, ensuring the quality of service in full compliance with the principles of economy, eciency, timeliness and fairness.
Every procurement procedure seeks to apply the principles of free competition, equal treatment, non-discrimination, transparency, propoionality, rotation, and public access. Moreover, the economic principle may be subordinated to tendering criteria inspired by social demands, as well as to the protection of health and the environment and the pro-
102-9 102-10 103-2 103-3 308-1 407-1 408-1 409-1 414-1
I ncreasingly sustainable suppliers will manage to survive and grow be©er in the market and become key players and proactive members of an ecosystem that embraces industry, institutions and civil society.
As a strategic paner for sharing challenges and reaching future targets, a sustainable supply chain is vital for us.

qualied at
December 31


HUMAN RIGHTS
(%)
98 85 74 98 85 74 98 85 74
2020 2019 2018 2020 2019 2018 2020 2019 2018
ENVIRONMENT
(%)
SAFETY (%)
Fuel
purchases
GAS (mil euros)
1,510 1,952 2,024 642 970 906 325 976 1,698
2020 2019 2018 2020 2019 2018 2020 2019 2018
OIL (mil euros) COAL (mil euros)
(1) "Tier 1" suppliers are those with active contracts as of December 31, 2020 of more than 25 thousand euros.
Sustainability criteria are applied right from the initial phases of supplier qualication and selection, with a strict focus on health, safety, the environment and human rights. In addition, at the tender stage, specic sustainability Ks are applied, in a mechanism that rewards and invests in suppliers commi©ed to enhancing their sustainability. These suppliers go beyond the traditional concept of cost savings, by covering any price premium with the extra value contributed by the more sustainable purchases made. Throughout the life of each contract, we check compliance with our requirements and the commitments made in relation to these Ks, applying the Supplier Pe¥ormance Management program.
A key element of this model is the development of a circular economy approach that reviews production processes and/or changes purchasing methods in that context. Application of this approach involves the denition of metrics and indicators, collaboration with suppliers and the promotion of co-innovation projects with them. In paicular, the "Circular Economy Initiative for Supplier Engagement" involves about 200 suppliers globally in 12 product categories, which currently account for more than 60% of spending on materials. The initiative is based on adopting the Environmental Product Declaration (EPD), with the aim of quantifying, ceifying and objectively communicating the impacts generated throughout the life cycle of each supply (water consumption, CO2 emissions, impact on the soil, etc.). Lastly, by adopting a dedicated IT tool (the Circular Supplier Tool), it is possible to aggregate data and set sector benchmarks and improvement targets. For fuher details, see the "Circular economy" chapter of this document. A number of Communities will be launched during 2021, with the involvement of various Sta Functions and Business Lines that will be tasked with the constant, pro-active monitoring of topics relating to the sustainable supply chain and the circular economy. The ultimate objective is to fuher integrate the principles of sustainability and circular economy within the overall process of supply chain management, measuring the value generated in a manner that takes account of the sustainable development goals.
Our supplier qualication system ensures the careful selection and assessment of companies wishing to paicipate in procurement procedures. The system assesses their satisfaction of the technical, nancial, legal, environmental, health and safety, human rights and ethical integrity requirements, to ensure the proper level of quality and reliability of any awarded contracts. All suppliers, based on their businesses, can paicipate in a qualication process for one or more Product Groups (PGs): suppliers are only deemed suitable when they meet all the requirements specied for each PG.
Careful and comprehensive analysis of the PG tree is carried out constantly. Our Global Procurement units, business units and competent HSEQ areas map the activities included in each PG and assign a risk level to each topic (safety, environment, human rights, spending, irreplaceable supplier, etc.). Following this risk assessment, PGs are grouped into dierent families associated with their respective assessed risk. Qualication requirements vary, depending on the implications and specic impacts associated with each Group: for example, for a PG with a high environmental risk, Environmental Management System ISO 14001 ceication is usually required, while PGs with a high safety risk must also have Occupational Health and Safety Management System OHSAS 18001/ISO 45001 ceication.
The qualication system, governed by an internal procedure, was established in accordance with the relevant laws and regulations and has various qualication paths that take account of the above-mentioned risk classes. The system requires compliance with the principles set out in the Code of Ethics, the Zero Tolerance of Corruption Plan and the 231 Model, the Policy on Human Rights and the UN Global Compact, with specic reference to the absence of conicts of interest (even potential conicts) and – depending on the risk class – also requires the presentation of specic ceicates/self-declarations, or on-site visits, to verify satisfaction of the above requirements. Compliance with the requirements must be assured for the entire duration of the qualication and, as such, those already included in the Enel Register of Qualied Suppliers are constantly monitored, paly by reference to external databases, for events that may aect their company and its main representatives.
› a guarantee for Enel, providing an updated list of entities with proven reliability (in legal, nancial, technical and organizational, ethical, health and safety, and environmental aspects) on which we can draw;
› an oppounity, in compliance with the relevant current regulations, for suppliers to be invited to paicipate in the procurement procedures announced by Group companies.
Individual suppliers can only be added to the Supplier Register (or remain on it if previously qualied) and be invited to paicipate in the Group's procurement procedures if they receive an overall positive assessment. If an adverse opinion is expressed, the qualication request will be rejected and the contractor may not be invited to paicipate in Group tenders. The evaluation of individual sustainability requirements contributes to the overall assessment of the company's suitability for inclusion on the Supplier Register. If exclusion from the Enel Register follows an adverse assessment of one or more sustainability requirements, the supplier may present a new qualication request at a later time.
In 2020, 100% of qualied suppliers were assessed according to social, environmental and safety criteria2. The number of qualied suppliers with a contract still active
occupational safety, social, and service quality/punctuality
aspects


suppliers and Enel

Inclusion of sustainability K-factors in supplier selection and contracting processes
Plan of the needs of Business Lines and Sta Functions Handling of purchase requests by the Purchasing Depament
Assessment of safety, environmental and human rights aspects
(2) Only contracts woh more than 25 thousand euros (so-called delegated purchases; excluding Sanpaolo, Edesur and pa of Romania). New suppliers without a contract in 2019 totalled 6,014 (3,748 in 2019 without a contract in 2018), of which 41% were qualied (27% in 2019).
at the end of 2020 is approximately 5,100 (around 38% of active suppliers as of December 31), while the total number of active qualied companies is 16,124.
The following table shows the trend in the qualied suppliers percentage for the three aspects analyzed by process.
ms of supply chain sustainability, we require contractors/ suppliers and subcontractors – among other ma©ers – to respect and protect internationally recognized human rights, as well as ethical and social obligations in terms of: child and female labor, equal treatment, non-discrimination, freedom to unionize, freedom of association and representation, forced labor, health, safety and environmental protection, sanitary conditions and regulations on wages, social security and pension contributions, insurance and tax. We also expressly require suppliers to commit to adopt and implement the principles of the Global Compact and to guarantee that they will be respected by their employees and subcontractors when carrying out all activities. Moreover, suppliers must agree to respect the principles contained in the Enel Code of Ethics, or at least take inspiration from equivalent principles in managing their businesses. Lastly, suppliers are required to apply the "International Labour Organization" conventions or, if more restrictive, the applicable regulations in the country where their activities are carried out.
In these areas, we reserve the right to carry out checks and monitoring of any type to verify compliance with the above obligations by the contractor and its subcontractors, or entities under its responsibility which are assigned to execute the contract, and to terminate it immediately in the event of proven infringement of those obligations.


In a context of continuous improvement, the Library is being updated and a dedicated agile room has been created.
Consistent with our commitment to introduce sustainability aspects into the tendering processes, in 2020 we adopted a structured process governed by a specic procedure designed to monitor the tendering commitments made by the supplier throughout the entire life of the contract. This process is based on a "Library" listing the "sustainability Ks" that may be used in tender processes by the dierent purchasing units, depending on the PG concerned. There are three main categories: Fuel purchases GAS (mil euros)
The Group has adopted specic operating practices to check on "integrity requirements", with the aim of consolidating the existing control system through more rigorous action to tackle corruption. In paicular by se©ing out specic documentary check criteria for legal and integrity requirements that are homogeneous and applicable to the procurement process (from the qualication phase through to awarding individual contracts); identifying operational checks to enhance the preventive tools available to tackle in a rational, organic and specic manner any cases of corruption or the factors that contribute to its spread; promoting a widespread culture of compliance and ethical conduct. An AI system has been added to the above process, as a tool to analyze and mitigate reputational, environmental and social risks, etc., in order to select and constantly monitor suppliers by checking open-source information.
We include specic clauses in all contracts for works, services and supplies, which are updated periodically to take account of the various regulatory changes and align with international best practices. The General Terms and Conditions comprise a general section containing provisions applicable to all countries, as well as Country Annexes which contain the clauses specic to each country. In ter-2020 2019 2018 2020 2019 2018 2020 2019 2018
service and
supply
contracts
5,480 5,245 5,726 3,625 3,702 3,656 4,965 5,428 4,141
2020 2019 2018 2020 2019 2018 2020 2019 2018
WORKS (mil euros)


36%
of assessed that have been assigned improvement actions

of assessed presented improvement action plans and improved their ESG peormance as a consequence

We assess and monitor the pe¥ormance of our suppliers – during both the procurement process and the execution of contracts – through the Supplier Pe¥ormance Management (SPM) process. This aims not only to take corrective actions when necessary, but also to encourage suppliers to improve by incentivizing best practices through reward schemes. The Supplier Pe¥ormance Management process, governed by a dedicated procedure, is based on the objective and systematic disclosure of data and information on the execution of the contracted work.
This data is used to develop specic indicators, also called categories (Quality, Punctuality, Health and Safety, Environment, Human Rights & Fairness and Innovation & Collaboration), which are combined to form a weighted average and produce the Supplier Pe©ormance Index (SPI). The categories and SPI can be used as assessment elements for paicipation in tenders and for continuation of the contractual relationship in accordance with the applicable local requirements. Monitoring activities are conducted by the various Business Lines with suppo from the relevant HSE units, where applicable, and the Qualication & Vendor Rating unit. In addition, all individuals who interact with suppliers have the oppounity to express their own assessment using the dedicated "Track & Rate" app.
For suppliers with poor pe¥ormance, we take specic action that can have an impact on:
In the event of issues with the conduct of a supplier, an action plan may be drawn up jointly, the execution of which is constantly monitored by Enel.
The SPM process monitored 612 PGs and 7,050 contractors last year (450 PGs and around 2,282 contractors in 2019).
At each stage of the procurement process, specic commi©ees comprising representatives from both the purchasing area and the Business Lines assess and monitor supplier pe¥ormance.
In paicular, the following commi©ees have been established:
Moreover, individual country-specic units ("Contract Controls Area") have been set up to carry out checks on the responsible management of the supply chain and assess and manage risks relating to joint and several liability (contractually applicable to successful tenderers and any subcontractors). The checks include an initial mass document analysis to check that suppliers have made timely social security contributions and complied with their contractual obligations. A subsequent, second-level check on a sample of tenders involves targeted and thorough verications with on-site inspections.
We have organized many meetings with contractors on sustainability ma©ers in recent years, with a view to exchanging ideas and approaches. In addition, aicles are published periodically on the Enel Global Procurement website that highlight the commitment made by the Group to these topics (h©ps://globalprocurement.enel.com). We have also implemented numerous initiatives to engage contractors with regard to protection and awareness, paicularly on health and safety ma©ers. Due to these initiatives, there has been a signicant decrease in accidents at work in recent years.
Dierent initiatives have been launched to make the supply chain ever more resilient, and the concept of supplier centricity ever more concrete and tangible.
As an example, the Supplier Development Program staed in July 2020 suppos the growth of suppliers and, at the same time, contributes to the achievement of our strategic objectives. The program addresses all small- and medium-sized suppliers active in strategic areas seeking to ensure excellent pe¥ormance, maintained over time, in such areas as safety, timeliness, quality, environment, human rights and fairness, innovability (ability to innovate sustainably) and collaboration. By signing agreements with the principal market players, we make our networking ability and skills available to the supply chain, guaranteeing better than market conditions and making a paial contribution to the services oered in the context of the program.
In addition to dimensional growth, the development objectives promoted involve:
increased awareness about sustainability and digitalization ma©ers;
dierentiation of the business and consequent reduction in supplier dependence on us;
increased nancial strength;
internationalization, which helps grow our business outside of Italy and Europe.
On the other hand, the Supplier Journey project seeks to improve eciency and maximize the value of our relations with suppliers, throughout the entire process. Here too, we actively analyze our processes, systems and the approach followed when working with suppliers on a daily basis, thus facilitating the improvement actions identied by listening to the principal actors involved: buyers, contract managers, administrative colleagues and suppliers.

for Sustainable Value: Supplier Development Program e Supplier Journey

Together with major European electric utilities, we are actively engaged in Be©ercoal – a global initiative to promote the continuous improvement of corporate responsibility in the international coal industry. Be©ercoal has released a code of conduct based on existing and agreed standards of social responsibility in the mining sector. This details guidelines which mining companies can refer to when drawing up their own social, environment and ethical policies. The Be©ercoal Code tells suppliers what members expect from their practices in relation to four main categories: management; commitment to ethics and transparency; human and labor rights; and environmental pe¥ormance, while promoting ongoing improvement. In 2020, a new version of the Code was nalized to align it with the latest best practices in sustainability, thereby contributing to achievement of the applicable Sustainable Development Goals.
After signing a le©er of commitment, mining paicipants in the program embark on a viuous path by accepting on-site checks, carried out by independent third paies, to verify that the Code's principles have been applied, and agreeing an ongoing improvement plan to overcome any shocomings.

In addition to Be©ercoal's growing presence in various forums in the area of coal and supply chain sustainability, the initiative has become an example of collaboration among the various stakeholders, geared towards improving socially responsible practices within the supply chain. During 2020, the mining companies commi©ed to the Be©ercoal initiative produced more than 400 mil t of coal. Although the global pandemic linked to Covid-19 prevented the inspections planned in Russia, Colombia and South Africa, 14 improvement plans were monitored actively throughout the year, three new repos were published on the assessments made of mining sites, and the two working paies dedicated specically to Russia and Colombia continued their work.
For fuher information, please refer to the website: www. be©ercoal.org.
Suppliers of solid and liquid fuel are selected through the "Know Your Customer" process that, for each counterpa, evaluates the reputational and economic-nancial aspects and their satisfaction of the appropriate technical and commercial requirements. Checks also ensure that suppliers are not on any specic UN, EU or OFAC blacklists. These lists identify individuals or organizations associated with terrorist associations, organizations under EU nancial sanctions, and so-called Specially Designated Nationals (SDNs) who are subject to US sanctions on terrorism or drug tracking charges, among others.
To assess the sustainability aspects of coal sources, an internal process has been established to ensure that Group requirements for occupational safety, environment and human rights have been satised.
Purchase contracts entered into with each supplier are subject to the Group principles embedded in the Code of Ethics and the Zero Tolerance of Corruption Plan, with which suppliers must comply. We reserve the right to terminate contracts in severe cases of non-compliance with those principles.
Lastly, to mitigate the risks arising from the maritime shipment of fuel, we have adopted a tool to vet and select the carriers used. Ve©ing is a recognized industry standard for oil transpoation; but, for a few years now, Enel and an increasing number of operators have also begun to apply this methodology to the transpoation of bulk cargoes.
Works,
service and
supply
contracts
SUPPLIES (mil euros)
5,480 5,245 5,726 3,625 3,702 3,656 4,965 5,428 4,141
2020 2019 2018 2020 2019 2018 2020 2019 2018
WORKS (mil euros) SERVICES (mil euros)
% suppliers qualied at
December 31
HUMAN RIGHTS
(%)
98 85 74 98 85 74 98 85 74
2020 2019 2018 2020 2019 2018 2020 2019 2018
ENVIRONMENT
(%)
SAFETY (%)

What is Intrinsic Safety? Intrinsic safety is an ethical and moral duty towards the people working for the Company and everyone who works together with Enel.
It is also the latest ambitious initiative, which was launched in March 2020 by Global Power Generation in three separate waves, each divided into streams, which concentrate on sharing best practices, improving the Health & Safety processes at all the plants and reviewing the elements that make them up.
This project is active in all 31 countries where GPG operates as well as in the plants that will be put into service over the upcoming months and years as additional capacity. It will be carried out over the 2020-2022 three-year period and intends to make the Group's eet increasingly safe by analyzing processes and components: from electrical panels to switches, from moving pas to the walkway gratings, with paicular focus on the activities connected to the job sites involved with coal phase-out.
Thanks to the data-driven approach, an in-depth analysis was carried out on tens of thousands of safety observations arriving from the plants that, together with the improvement programs that were launched over recent years with various technologies, has made it possible for us to identify the main sectors of intervention. Each wave will be comprised of precise phases: preparing guidelines for identifying the components to be analyzed, mapped and assessed at the plant, dening actions for improvement and technical solutions to be implemented, and nally executing and concretely adopting the action plans that were identied for each plant.
This innovation stas with the hardware aspects, but it would not be able to exist without the most impoant software of all, people. Our colleagues working at the power plants are in fact the eyes and ears of the Group for each plant, and therefore are the rst who can and must suggest activities for improvement.
Also thanks to Intrinsic Safety and frontier technologies for minimizing the risk of injury, Global Power Generation intends to reach the objective of "Zero Injuries".
Each plant is a home. More than 16 thousand people in the Global Power Generation Business Line are commi ed to making the 1,300 homes (plants) distributed in the world increasingly safer.
102-15

| Industrial E Environmental Social Governance Technological |
Goals New Redened Outdated |
gs, with pa–icular focus on the activities connected to the job sites involved with coal phase-out. |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| 194 | Sustainability Report 2020 2020 Sustainability Repo |
195 13 |

on health and safety and environment in 2023 Reduction of injury frequency rates compared to prior years (LTIFR) 0.10 (-29% vs 2019)1 ON-PLAN Reduction of injury frequency rates compared to prior years (LTIFR) Strengthening of horizontal initiatives on Business Lines and/or Countries aimed at growing the culture, awareness and commitment of employees and contractors with respect to health and safety issues • "HSEQ2 Professional Family Days" held • Country Committees held periodically3 ON-PLAN Strengthening of horizontal initiatives on Business Lines and/or Countries aimed at growing the culture, awareness and commitment of employees and contractors with respect to health and safety issues Improvement of the operating assets control system in order to optimize directional strategies, methods of execution, results analysis and the consequent improvement activities • Digitisation of H&S control and monitoring processes through the development of SH.Suite, systems and digital dashboards • Integration of SHE metrics into the KPI dashboard • Development of SHE. Start which manages information from ECoS, Contractor Assessment, Contractor Support and related management activities ON-PLAN Improvement of the operating assets control system in order to optimize directional strategies, methods of execution, results analysis and the consequent improvement activities
(1) This gure is the result of the calculation made using unrounded decimal values and refers to the combined LTIFR, Enel people and contractors.
(2) HSEQ: Health, Safety, Environment, Quality.
(3) The Country Commiees are periodic meetings chaired by the Country Manager and aended by all the Directors of the Business Lines and respective HSEQ managers with the aim of facilitating collaboration between the Business Lines and improving Country-level safety.
Enel considers the health, safety and psychological and physical well-being of individuals the most precious asset to be protected at all times of life, at work, at home and during leisure time, and is commi©ed to developing and disseminating a robust safety culture throughout the entire perimeter of the Company in order to guarantee a workplace that is free from health and safety hazards. The Group is commi©ed to promoting a culture of health and safety in every country in which it operates. Its objective is to increase awareness of risks and promote responsible behaviors in order to ensure that the activities will be performed with a high level of quality and without injuries, while protecting the health of persons. Enel is also involving contractor companies in the development and awareness programs: each person must feel that they are responsible for their own health and safety as well as for the health and safety of others.
The constant commitment of all, integration of safety in processes and in training activities, disclosure and analysis of near miss accidents, rigorous selection and management of contractor companies, continuous quality controls, sharing of experience and benchmarking with the top international players are the foundational elements of our safety culture.
Since the sta of the Covid-19 emergency in February 2020, we have taken action in order to protect the health of our colleagues and guarantee a continuous supply of electrical energy to the communities where we operate, which is an aspect that is even more crucial at a moment like this one.
Considering the rapid evolution of the pandemic and its progressive spreading, we have created a global task force as well as local task forces, one for each country where we operate, which has made it possible to monitor the progression of the epidemic, using dedicated indicators, and immediately adopt all the measures necessary to protect the health and safety of our colleagues and guarantee the continuity of the supply of essential services.
We have implemented new operating models to minimize the risk of infection, also dening specic prevention protocols, by dynamically re-adapting the activity plan and the dened measures related to the development of the pandemic on a global level.
For all the colleagues whose work can be pe¥ormed "remotely", since the beginning of the emergency we have made sma working possible.
For operating units (approximately 13 thousand colleagues) that had to remain in the eld, we have applied strict infection containment measures that go far beyond regulatory compliance. In paicular, the operating units have been divided into smaller nuclei (elementary cells), that include the smallest number of people technically possible, who are separated by space and/or time. We have pe¥ormed a stress test on the critical infrastructures on a global scale with
the purpose of verifying the possible operation based on dierent possible infection scenarios and testing the response system dened for the emergency. We have started information and training initiatives targeted towards reminding employees of the main preventive measures to adopt during their work day (safety journey), staing from the moment they leave their home.
Since the sta of the epidemic, we have requested our suppliers on a global scale to undeake all the actions considered appropriate, with a standard at least equivalent to what has been adopted by the Enel Group, in order to guarantee the health of their employees and to limit infection, both when executing the contracts in force with Group companies as well as during any other occasion when meeting. For this reason, we have sent periodic communications to companies to inform them about the safety protocols and procedures we have dened at our sites and to request all our contractors and service providers working at these sites to implement the measures they contain.
In all the main countries where Enel is present, Äu vaccination programs were carried out as a health preventive measure and in paicular to be able to help quickly identify cases of Covid-19 at an early stage.
We have also suppoed the communities where we are present with donations and solidarity initiatives for the health-care structures and the organizations working on the front line to manage the emergency.


"Statement of Commitment to Health and Safety" and "Stop Work Policy", both signed by the Chief Executive Of cer, are two documents based on which the Enel Group's commitment is founded.
The Statement is based on the following principles:
979 thousand hours TRAINING ADDRESSED TO (1)
0.52
COMBINED INJURIES FREQUENCY RATE (FR)
Enel people and contractors, reduced 29% in comparison to 2019
184
EXTRA CHECKING ON SITE (ECoS)
(1) This number includes information, training and instruction provided to Enel people
E nel promotes innovation for the achievement of ambitious objectives, being aware that a better future is built on the basis of solid values, first among which is the health and safety of people.
103-2 103-3 102-15 403-1 403-2 403-3 403-4 403-5 403-6 403-7 403-9 416-1 EU18 DMA EU (former EU21) DMA EU (former EU16)
Internal Audit
Silvia Fiori
The continuous improvement of safety performance objectives is concrete proof of the Company's commitment to pursue sustainable growth objectives in the interest of all stakeholders.
We measure our success by ensuring protection for people who work with us: there is no creation of value without safety for people.
<-- PDF CHUNK SEPARATOR -->
1 2 3 4 At a Glance Our ESG peormance Trend Topic Appendix
Based on the Stop Work Policy, Enel people are required to promptly repo and/or stop any risky situation or unsafe behavior by internal or external personnel.
In line with the Code of Ethics, the Statement and the Stop Work Policy, Enel has dened a specic Health & Safety Policy that requires every Group Business Line to have its own Health & Safety Management System in compliance with international standard ISO 45001.
The Management System is based on the identication of hazards, the qualitative and quantitative assessment of the risks, the planning and implementation of the preventive and protective measures, the check of the eectiveness of the preventive and protective measures, and any corrective measures. In paicular, it involves both Enel people and personnel from contractor companies who work at Enel's plants and sites, and is based on the following shared principles:
cation of risk situations up to the choice of solutions to prevent and/or reduce them;
From an organizational perspective, the Holding Health, Safety, Environment and Quality unit (HSEQ) assumes the roles of supervision, guidance and coordination, promoting the dissemination and sharing of best practices within the Group and external health and safety benchmarking with top international players in order to identify improvement oppounities and ensure constant commitment in the area of risk reduction.
Alongside the Holding Function, the Global Business Lines HSEQ structures orient and suppo the business in relation to health and safety issues, dene improvement plans and monitor their execution.
The combined injury Frequency Rate (FR) for Enel people and contractors in 2020 conrmed the downward trend already recorded in prior years, with a total of 0.52 injuries per million hours worked, a gure that is 29% lower than that of 2019.
In detail, the FR of Enel people decreased, totaling 0.60 injuries per one million hours worked (-33% versus 2019), and also that of contractor personnel, totaling 0.49 injuries per one million hours worked (-26% versus 2019), thus conrming the eectiveness of the strategies adopted and of the safety policies implemented in the Group. In 2020 there was 1 fatality involving an employee of the Enel Group, in Brazil, and 8 fatalities involving contractors (5 in Brazil, 1 each in Italy, Spain and Colombia). The causes of these 9 fatalities are mainly of electrical type. In 2020 there were 3 High Consequence injuries involving Enel Group employees and 20 involving contractors, mainly of mechanical type.
Enel has a specic injuries management policy (Policy 106 "Classication, communication, analysis and repoing of incidents") that denes roles and methods employed to guarantee prompt communication of incidents, ensuring the related causes analysis process, denition of improvement plans, and monitoring of the associated actions depending on the event type. The criteria prescribed by Policy 106 are applicable not only to injuries of high industrial signicance but also to minor events, including those not involving personal injuries (near misses). Therefore, all fatalities or severe injuries (or events that could have potentially caused a fatality or severe injury) involving Enel people or the personnel of contractor companies, are analyzed by a group of expes. The improvement actions
identied are constantly monitored and followed until the time of completion. If the event analysis reveals serious safety breaches by contractor companies, suitable provisions are adopted (contract termination, suspension of qualication, etc.).
In 2020, the Extra Checking on Site (ECoS) activities also continued with 184 ECoS that were pe¥ormed with the aid of digital remote control solutions, in spite of the emergency context determined by the Covid-19 pandemic. The purpose of the ECoS is to assess adequacy of the organization and processes implemented in a specic operational area. These checks are carried out by expe HSEQ personnel external to the operating units aected by the investigation, assisted by technical proles speci-


| 2020 | 0.49 |
|---|---|
| 2019 | 0.65 |
| 2018 | 0.87 |
| LTIFR(2) (i) |
|
| 2020 | 0.10 |
| 2019 | 0.13 |
| 2018 | 0.17 |

(1) This index is calculated by establishing the ratio between the number of injuries (all injuries, also those with 3 days of absence or less) and hours worked/1,000,000.


(2) The Lost Time Injury Frequency Rate is calculated by relating the number of injuries with hours worked * 200,000.

c to the business, and they make it possible to dene adequately monitored corrective actions for preventive purposes.
Safety is integrated in tender processes and the pe¥ormance of companies is monitored both on a preliminary level, by means of the qualication system, and during contract execution through a large number of control processes and tools such as the Supplier Pe¥ormance Management tool (SPM).

A specic "HSE Terms" document has been prepared and a©ached to all contracts since last year; the document in question must be signed by contractors when the works are awarded. The document, which is the same throughout the entire Group, denes the obligations in relation to health, safety and environmental aspects that the contractor must respect, placing the same obligation on its subcontractors. Any violation of the contractual conditions in question will produce specic penalties up to termination of the contract and/or suspension of qualication.
The Contractor Assessments also continued in 2020, which are specic assessments regarding safety issues carried out on the premises of the suppliers as well as at their job sites. In spite of the Covid-19 emergency, 1,185 Contractor Assessments were carried out in total for the dierent Enel Business Lines and Countries and Regions. The assessments are carried out during the qualication phase for each new vendor, or in cases in which criticalities emerge (severe injuries or fatalities) or low SMP rating scores. 2020 was also the year for additional extension and development of a structured and "data-driven" approach for supplier assessment, also thanks to the safety metric that
was dened for measuring the managerial and operational pe¥ormance of companies. The Contractors Safety Index (CSI), which is an indicator based on the detection in the eld of non-conformities, the number of injuries and their relative severity, has been applied extensively as an indicator used to detect faint signs and operational criticalities of contractors, so prevention can be selectively focused on the most critical companies and to make it possible to perform an objective assessment and implement consequence management for our suppliers.
Periodic multidisciplinary meetings (Evaluation Groups), with the purpose of evaluating the safety pe¥ormance of suppliers, were held in all the Business Lines and Countries and Regions in order to dene targeted actions and customized accompaniment and suppo plans for companies to ensure that the desired safety standards will be reached.
Enel views technological innovation as a valid tool capable of improving a large number of processes from the H&S perspective. Several innovation projects on safety proceeded and various new projects were launched in 2020 in order to improve processes, staing from personnel training, continuing with the implementation of preventive and

protective measures, up to the execution and analysis of corrective checks.
Personal voltage detectors, i.e. poable devices designed to identify electrical voltage on low- and medium-voltage power lines located at operationally signicant distances from the worker but not necessarily involved in the activity in progress, have been adopted in the Infrastructure and Networks area. Promoted initiatives include an application that uses uploaded conrmation photos to guarantee that all activities calling for preparatory electrical disconnection of live pas have been carried out in full compliance with the globally adopted rules to ensure complete safety.
Within the scope of the "Intrinsic Safety" program, which was implemented with synergy and co-design between various Enel Global Business Lines and Holding Functions, many innovative projects were created in 2020, such as:
Innovative solutions are currently being developed in the area of HMI (Human-Machine Interaction) to prevent the risk of accidental impacts with moving work equipment or with underground service lines, and for the monitoring of health conditions during work activities, in order to prevent and/or quickly manage potential situations of danger and/ or emergency.
The Enel Group has dened a structured health management system based on preventive measures, to develop a corporate culture oriented towards the promotion of mental-physical health, organizational well-being and balance between the professional and personal spheres. In this context, the Group carries out global and local awareness raising campaigns to promote healthy lifestyles, sponsors screening program aimed at preventing the onset of illnesses and guarantees the availability of medical services.
An initiative for strengthening the digitalization of the employee health surveillance process was staed in Italy during the year, which involves the introduction of an IT tool
| FATALITIES (no.) |
|
|---|---|
| 2020 | 1 |
| 2019 | 1 |
| 2018 | 1 |
| 2020 | 8 |
|---|---|
| 2019 | 6 |
| 2018 | 7(1) |
| FATALITIES |
|---|
| (no.) |
| (no.) | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2020 | 3 | |
| 2019 | 3 | |
| 2018 | 5 | |
(no.)

(1) Considering all the areas in which the Group operates and the activities managed, including the companies consolidated using the equity method and the companies for which the BSO (Build, Sell and Operate) mechanism was applied, the total number of fatalities is equal to 8.
(2) Sum of: injuries that, as of December 31, 2020 resulted in more than 6 months of absence from work; injuries that as of December 31, 2020 are still open and are considered severe (initial prognosis > 30 days); injuries categorized as "Life Changing Accidents" (LCA), regardless of the number of days of absence from work related to them.
that manages medical records. This will provide benets in terms of eciency and document archiving, and will make it possible to monitor health parameters in an aggregated and anonymous manner.
Fuhermore, a policy is planned on a global level for the prevention of local diseases and to provide suppo in the case of illness or injuries while abroad. There is also a smartphone application that provides indications about travel information, vaccination guidelines and a global insurance policy for all personnel travelling abroad, which also includes health coverage in the case of epidemics and pandemics. In relation to the injury phenomenon, apa from implementing plans designed to reduce the frequency to zero, it is planned to adopt a psychological suppo program for employees who have suered severe injuries, together with their families, in order to assist them from the time of the event up to the return to normality.
Constant monitoring of epidemiological and health trends is carried out within the perimeter of the Enel Group, with the aim of implementing plans composed of preventive measures and measures to protect the health of employees and anyone working for the Group, on both a local and global level. A listening and psychological suppo service was staed during this year which will remain active independently of the health emergency, the purpose of which is to provide employees with a customized help program in an anonymous, free and condential manner.
Moreover, the Enel Group implements a systematic and continuous process for identifying and evaluating correlated work stress risks, in compliance with the "Stress at Work Prevention and Well-being at Work Promotion" Policy. This allows prevention, identication and management of stress in work situations that can aect individuals and more extensive areas of the organization, supplying also a series of indications aimed at promoting a culture of organizational well-being.
The Group provides its people with specic conventions that provide ready access to: medical and healthcare services, assistance actions for persons with disabilities or in emergency situations, and specic preventive medicine initiatives.
Finally, with regard to the Covid emergency, a new Covid-19 Global Insurance Group policy was established since March 2020, which provides compensation to Group employees who had to be hospitalized for at least two nights or who required hospitalization in intensive care after testing positive for Covid-19.
Several health and safety communication campaigns were carried out in the year concerning areas of specic a©ention for the Company, based both on the publication of information on the company intranet, and on specic services on Enel TV and Enel Radio.
Overall, 49,307 Enel employees received approximately 980 thousand training hours in 2020, in addition to information and training activities on safety, with the purpose of increasing the know-how and specic skills of workers throughout the Group. The SHE project was fuher implemented in 2020: what started as an initiative shared among all the countries has become a real company process that Enel intends to promote in four dimensions, as illustrated below.
First of all "HSE without borders": a true example of integration. Reducing distances to share topics, solutions and good practices, promoting integration and co-design on all levels through feasible collaboration.
Rethinking our assets and processes from a safety point of view: "Intrinsic safety: equipment, tools and processes". Mapping and adapting plants, equipment and work methods to limit or eliminate the possibility of errors, thereby increasing the level of safety.
Paicular a©ention is also placed on Enel suppliers with the "Panership for safety, heath and the environment", which focuses on assisting Enel paners in adapting their company standards regarding HSE, with assessments and collaboration oppounities in the eld. Fuhermore, informational meetings are planned for all employees of the contracting companies who access Group plants before carrying out their work. The purpose of these meetings is to inform the workers of the specic risks connected with the work environment and of any additional risks related to other activities carried out in the same environments. These meetings, which only provide information, involve construction work sites and operation and maintenance activities, and are included among the consolidated risk prevention and protection activities.
Finally, SHE Factory, created with the precise objective of promoting a way to work that is safer for (and between) Enel people, also including suppliers, and more sustainable as regards the environment. It is a model that aims to spread a dierent cultu-

ral approach to HSE topics by everyone, and at all professional levels, also by using training projects and learning processes not only based on technical aspects, but also so-called soft skills. Communications on the global level in relation to health and safety were focused on topics concerning personal health and the most common pathologies.
103-2 103-3 416-1 EU25
Enel's installed plants are built in compliance with legislative prescriptions and the rules of best technical practice. Plants, machines and work equipment are subject to systematic and periodic checks and maintenance activities to guarantee correct operation in compliance with regulations and in accordance with the adoption of the best standards.
In order to guarantee health and safety of the community and reduce the impact of the typical activities of the Company's generation process on the external environment, the Company carries out monitoring campaigns such as measurement of the electromagnetic elds of power networks, noise levels, vibration and dust created by the electrical machines of power plants and distribution and transformer substations. Also the following environmentally signicant factors are monitored: atmospheric emissions and air quality, eÓuent discharge into su¥ace waters, water quality, production, reuse and disposal of wastes, soil quality, biodiversity impacts.
Considerable a©ention has been devoted to preventing harmful events involving members of the public who accidentally come into contact with electricity networks due to activities such as job sites near transmission lines or spos and leisure pursuits (shing, ying kites, etc.). A large number of awareness campaigns have been conducted, addressed both to the general public and to specic categories (construction companies, spos associations, etc.).
DMA EU (former EU21)
Enel has a common crisis and critical events management system across the various countries in which the Group is present. This global management system involves evaluation of the impact caused by critical events by means of a standard reference scale with three levels. High-impact crises are managed centrally, while medium- or low-impact crisis situations are managed within the specic organization in the individual countries.
High-impact crises ("Group Red Code") are addressed by creating a central crisis commi©ee in the Security Control Room at the Viale Regina Margherita headquaers in Rome, supplying suppo 24/7 for communication and coordination of information ows. Moreover, the crisis commi©ee denes strategies and actions to deal with critical events and coordinates all actions designed to restrict damage to the Enel Group's propey, protability and reputation.
Enel SpA has a Security unit in the Holding's People and Organization Function, aimed at dening strategies and guidelines on ma©ers of security, repoing to top management and promoting sharing of best practices. Also, a travel safety process has been set up in order to protect Enel people travelling in dierent countries, supplying information and communications on destination countries, indicating conditions that can constitute health and safety risks of travelers (e.g. political turmoil, terror a©acks, crime, health threats, etc.), the guidelines and conduct to follow, and activation of the necessary safety measures with regard to the level of risk identied for the destination country.
At the end of 2020, in the area of the Holding HSEQ Function, the HSE Emergency Management unit was created, which focuses on Health, Safety and Environment emergencies in order to ensure integration and continuous alignment when dening strategies and when managing emergency events on a Business Line and Country level. In fact, the progression of the pandemic and its spreading all over the world has raised awareness that the emergency will be continuing for a long period of time and that it is therefore necessary to pass from a management approach based on global and local task forces to the denition of an HSE emergency management process that is integrated in the company organization, through the establishment of a dedicated unit.
In the context of its operations in the eld of nuclear technologies, Enel has made a public commitment, in the role of shareholder, to guarantee that a clear nuclear safety policy is adopted in its atomic energy plants and that the plants are managed in accordance with criteria capable of assuring the absolute priority of safety and protection of workers, the community and the environment.
Fuher details are available on the Enel website (h©ps:// www.enel.com/investors/sustainability-performance/ enel-and-nuclear).
103-2 103-3 403-1 403-4
In order to consolidate the culture of safety and promote the adoption of behaviors that are consistent with company policies, Enel suppos social dialogue and paicipation of workers' representatives. Joint commi©ees have been set up for this purpose in the main countries in which Enel is present, dedicated to monitoring the issues and projects concerning workers' health and safety on the national level and also in terms of Business Lines. In Italy, in implementation of the ma©ers provided for by the national trade union agreement on the "Italian model of Enel Italia industrial relations", there has been a bilateral commission on workplace safety and protection policies in force since 2012. The commission examines the main projects aimed at improving safety standards, training projects, and preventive initiatives. In 2013, the Enel Global Framework Agreement created an analogous bilateral commission at the Group level, which dened a "joint recommendation" concerning health and safety standards applicable in all Enel countries. Negotiations are in progress to renew the Enel Global Framework Agreement.
The following details concern the commissions that operate in the main countries on the national and/or local levels.

| Country | Joint committees for health and safety |
|---|---|
| italy | Apa– from the bilateral commission on safety policies and workplace protection set up in 2012, there are two commi©ees working for Infrastructure and Networks and for Generation. Periodic meetings are also organized, involving the employer, the prevention and protection service manager, the medical oŒcer and the workers' safety representatives. The meetings are held at least once a year. |
| Russia | Every power plant in Russia has a health and safety commi©ee. Each organizational unit has a worker representative for issues con cerning occupational health and safety, with a total of 33 representatives repo–ing to company managers and union organizations. |
| Romania | In compliance with legislative provisions, there is an Occupational Safety and Health Commi©ee (CSSM) comprised of representa tives appointed by the trade organizations who represent the workers for each company (worker representatives) on the one hand, and, on the other, a number of people representing the employer equal to the number of worker representatives. The occupational health physician is required to pa–icipate in the CSSM meetings. |
| The Occupational Safety and Health Commi©ee aims to guarantee employee involvement in the development and implementation of decisions regarding occupational health and safety. Commi©ee members meet periodically (every three months and each time it is necessary) to discuss specic problems and propose measures/actions for managing, controlling and improving the level of employee health and safety. |
|
| Spain | The Comisión de paicipación y control has been set up on the national level, while the local level is handled by Comités de seguridad y salud territoriales. |
| Argentina | The power plants have bilateral commi©ees responsible for health and hygiene issues, which meet once a month or once every two months. The agreement does not specify the frequency with which the meetings are held. |
| Chile | All generation centers with more than 25 workers have Comités paritarios de higiene y seguridad, which make decisions concerning occupational health and safety by means of an annual operating plan. These commi©ees meet once a month. |
| Peru | We have bilateral commi©ees (workers and company representatives) that approve occupational health and safety policies according to law. |
| Brazil | The Comissão interna de prevenção de acidentes has been established at all sites, which is comprised of company representatives and worker representatives; the commi©ee focuses on the creation of accident prevention initiatives. |
| Colombia | Two joint commi©ees have been set up (COPASST), one for networks and one for generation, with the role of promoting the appli cation of occupational medicine legislation. |

Industrial E Environmental Social Governance Technological New Redened Outdated


Goals
102-15
| 1 At a Glance |
2 | 3 Our ESG peormance |
Trend Topic | 4 | Appendix | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Priorities Economic and Žnancial F value creation M |
Environmental management | Plan Environmental sustainability |
SDG | |||
| Target | ||||||
| Activities | 2020-2022 targets | 2020 results | Status | 2021-2023 targets | Tag | SDG |
| Reduction of specic SO2 emissions |
-85% in 2030 compared to the baseline year 2017 |
-88% compared to 2017 (0.10 g/kWh) |
ACHIEVED | -94% in 2030 compared to the baseline year 20171 |
E | |
| Reduction of specic NOx emissions |
-50% in 2030 compared to the baseline year 2017 |
-54% compared to 2017 (0.36 g/kWh) |
ACHIEVED | -70% in 2030 compared to the baseline year 20171 |
E | |
| Reduction of specic dust emissions |
-95% in 2030 compared to the baseline year 2017 |
-96% compared to 2017 (0.01 g/kWh) |
ACHIEVED | -98% in 2030 compared to the baseline year 20171 |
E | |
| Reduction of specic water extraction2 |
-50% in 2030 compared to the baseline year 2017 |
-55% compared to 2017 (0.20 l/kWh) |
ACHIEVED | -65% in 2030 compared to the baseline year 20171 |
E | |
| Reduction of waste products |
-40% in 2030 compared to the baseline year 2017 |
-87% compared to 2017 (1.2 Mt) |
ACHIEVED | -87%3 in 2030 compared to the baseline year 20171 |
E |
| Activities | 2020-2022 targets | 2020 results | Status | 2021-2023 targets | Tag | SDG | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| "ZERO Plastic" project - Reduction of single-use plastics at Enel Group sites4 |
• Launch of the programme to reduce single-use plastics across all Countries and Regions and definition of an overall target by 2022 • Enel sites in Italy5: -91% by 2021 • Enel sites in Spain: -65% by 2021 |
• Analysis of the solutions developed in the new scenario impacted by the current pandemic, and assessment of the potential for reducing the use of single-use plastics • Definition of the integration programme in all of the Group's countries and regions with a focus on offices • Enel sites in Italy5: -75% by 20206 • Enel sites in Spain: -64% by 20206 |
ON-PLAN | • Reducing single-use plastics (office scope), compared to the new structure imposed by the pandemic, in the main countries of operation • Extension of the project in plants by 2023 • Enel sites in Italy5: -85% by 2023 • Enel sites in Spain: -75% by 2023 |
E | ||
| Minimising the impact of Enel sites on habitats and species included on the Red List of the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) |
• Improving company processes for risk assessment and biodiversity management on plants and assets • Establishing Group indicators and adopting biodiversity performance monitoring • Internal awareness-raising initiatives on biodiversity protection, reaching 100% of the Enel population • Increasing the partnership framework and stakeholder engagement |
E G |
(1) Targets redened in line with the new target to reduce Scope 1 specic emissions by 2030, ceied by the Science-Based Targets initiative. (2) Extractions considered net of the poion of water discarded into the sea after the desalination process (brine). (3) These targets exclude waste produced by the decommissioning of thermal plants.
(4) Compared to the volume of single-use plastics used in 2018.
(5) This does not include oces with fewer than 20 employees.
(6) Reduction calculated based on oce occupancy and pandemic contingencies.
The protection of the environment and of natural resources, as well as the need to combat climate change are, for us, strategic factors in the planning, operation and development of our activities for promoting sustainable economic development in the communities where we work, as well as key factors for consolidating the Company's leadership in the energy markets.
For this reason, as early as 1996 we adopted a Group environmental policy, updated in 2018, that is applied throughout the Company's structure and in the entire value chain1 . The full policy content is shown below in the present chapter.
To ensure constant oversight and monitoring, activities of environmental relevance are managed through a widespread and harmonized organization, as regards the general guidelines for environmental policy, from a central Holding unit, which, in the Business Lines and Global Service Functions, is anked by structures, dedicated personnel and managers who ensure adoption of the common strategic lines and guidelines. In paicular, Sta Functions coordinate the management of relevant environmental issues, ensuring the necessary specialist suppo in line with Holding guidelines, whilst the operating units manage specic aspects related to the various industrial sites. To suppo the environmental pe¥ormance monitoring activities and the denition of improvement plans for the operating units of the Business Lines, in 2019 the Group environmental repoing system, Enel Data on Environment (EDEN), was renewed and was fuher updated in 2020.
g/kWh
SPECIFIC EMISSIONS OF SO2
Global Power Generation
Because only an electric power plant that sits harmoniously in the natural context in which it is located is truly sustainable and capable of generating value in the long term.
Salvatore Bernabei
Because every power generation plant is 'the guest' of a local area. Protecting its biodiversity and its natural capital means respecting the community with which it cohabits.
The protection of natural capital and of biodiversity are an integral pa of our power generation strategy.
Application of the ISO 14001 ceied Environmental Management Systems (EMS) is one of the strategic tools de ned by the environmental policy. At the end of 2020, EMSs were activated and ceied on almost all operating assets, while for the new plants and installations preparatory activities for ceication are progressively planned. Given the complexity and variety of activities carried out in the Group, an ISO 14001:2015 ceied modular approach, with the denition of a management system at Holding level, and which provides direction and coordination to the Business Lines on environmental themes, has been adopted. Each Business Line has launched its own EMS focused on specic activities. Fuhermore, the main thermal and geothermal production sites in Europe also have EMAS (Eco-Management and Audit Scheme) registration. In compliance with the four fundamental pillars underpinning our environmental policy, specically in terms of our commitment towards "protecting the environment by preventing adverse eects", the Group "Stop Work Policy" asks all people who work for us to intervene promptly and stop working when risks arise that aect not only their own health and safety but also the environment.
Training is one of the strategic objectives of the Group's


policy and forms an integral pa of the EMS. In 2020, around 48,000 hours were dedicated to training, an increase of 46% approximately compared to 2019, especially in Italy and South America, and which concerned, for example, topics on water and waste management, environmental restoration and prevention activities. Moreover in 2020, an environmental training program commenced targeted at increasing the expeise and responsibility for operations of technical personnel, in order to ensure the same skills and operational standards in all countries where the Group operates. The program will continue throughout 2021. Awareness raising days were also held on the topics of the energy transition, environmental risk management, and the value of correct management of environmental data.
0.36 g/kWh
SPECIFIC EMISSIONS OF NOX
0.01 g/kWh
SPECIFIC EMISSIONS OF DUST
0.20 l/kWh
SPECIFIC WATER NEEDS
1.2 mln t
TONS OF WASTE PRODUCED
187
PROJECTS
for the protection of biodiversity
65.7 % TOTAL WASTE RECOVERED
(1) The Enel Group's environmental policy extends across the entire value chain and applies to all the production phases of every product and service, including distribution and logistics phases, as well as the related waste management; to each site and building; all relationships with external stakeholders; every key business paner (including paners related to non-managed operations, joint ventures, outsourcing or third-pay producers); every supplier, including service and contractor suppliers; all due diligence and Merger&Acquisition processes.
Enel has had a Group environmental policy in place since 1996, which is based on four fundamental principles mentali: Enel has had a Group environmental policy in place since 1996, which is based on four fundamental principles mentali:
Strategic factors in the planning, implementation and development of Enel's operations include protecting the environment and natural resources, tackling climate change, and contributing towards sustainable economic development. These are also key factors in consolidating the Company's position as leader in the energy market. Strategic factors in the planning, implementation and development of Enel's operations include protecting the environment and natural resources, tackling climate change, and contributing towards sustainable economic development. These are also key factors in consolidating the Company's position as leader in the energy market. Technologies (BAT). the plants. international best practices.
Chapter: "Environmental sustainability" Chapter: "Environmental sustainability"
2. To reduce environmental impacts by using the best available technologies and best practices in the construction, implementation and decommissioning stages of installations, with a view to life cycle analysis and circular economy. 2. To reduce environmental impacts by using the best available technologies and best practices in the construction, implementation and decommissioning stages of installations, with a view to life cycle analysis and circular economy.
1. To apply internationally-recognised Environmental Management Systems to the whole organisation, underpinned by the principle of ongoing improvement and adoption of environmental indices to measure the environmental peormance of the whole organisation. 1. To apply internationally-recognised Environmental Management Systems to the whole organisation, underpinned by the principle of ongoing improvement and adoption of environmental indices to measure the environmental peormance of the whole organisation. Chapter: "Environmental sustainability"
Chapter: "Environmental sustainability"- "Net-zero ambition" Chapter: "Environmental sustainability"- "Net-zero ambition"
Chapter: "Environmental sustainability" "Net-zero ambition" Chapter: "Environmental sustainability" "Net-zero ambition"
impacts;
stakeholders;
Group's activities.
Chapter: "Environmental sustainability" Chapter: "Environmental sustainability"
restructuring.

distribution.
stress areas.
102-15
In order to identify and minimize environmental risks related to our activities, we also apply a series of impoant assessment and intervention tools at Group level working in synergy to protect the environment.
Group Policy for the classication and analysis of environmental accidents. Environmental accidents are classied according to their type and relevance. This classication is based on their possible impact on the environmental matrices and on any potentially sensitive targets (ecosystems and protected areas), in addition to their negative impact on the organization itself. The policy sets out the communication procedures for such events, analyzing their causes, and monitoring subsequent corrective actions and improvements in accordance with their classication and relevance.
Policy for assessing environmental risks and oppounities. The policy applies to all operating sites and to the sta Functions in all geographical areas in which we operate, with a unique model of shared, organic and homogeneous analysis. The analysis ensures e cient identication, classication and management of risks and oppounities for the environment and for
the organization, with an approach progressively encompassing the entire life cycle, and which involves the assessment of the interactions with environmental matrices and of the checks adopted for regulatory compliance of more stringent voluntary targets of continuous improvement, as well as environmental aspects linked to governance and strategic guidelines carried out by the central Functions of the organization.
Extra Checking on Site (ECoS) Policy. The ECoS is a tool for the planning and carrying out of on-site visits by teams of inter-divisional expes to suppo operating plants and facilities. This initiative aims to set out an initiative targeted at the denition of improvement plans and the sharing of best practices. In 2020, the different Business Lines across all the Countries in which the Group operates realized over 60 ECoS with a focus on the environment. See also the chapter "Occupational health and safety".
Environmental assessment of suppliers. In consideration of the impoance that suppliers have in determining the overall environmental pe¥ormances of the Company, we have adopted an environmental assessment procedure of suppliers that is structured and homogeneous for the entire Group, and that can be activated in the supplier qualication phase, specically for those providing environmentally critical risk activities, or following impoant environmental events, for the identication of improvements under the responsibility of the supplier itself.
305-1 305-7
The reduction of the environmental impacts associated with the operation of our plants is a strategic objective for us, through the application of the best available technologies and of best international practices. Specically, with reference to CO2 emissions and to the main pollutants, during 2020 there was a net reduction both of total and specic values, was mainly due to lower thermal production, in paicular coal, compared to 2019; this was on account of the sale of the Russian coal-red plant at Reftinskaya on October 1, 2019 and its ensuing exit from the scope of consolidation, and to the shutdown of the Tarapacá group in Chile on December 31, 2019, as well as a decrease in production of the plants still active. Fuhermore, in 2020, in line with Company's process of decarbonization, the coal red plants of Compostilla and Teruel in Spain were shut down, as were unit 2 of the Brindisi plant in Italy and unit 1 of the Bocamina plant in Chile.
305-1
The reduction of greenhouse gases is one of the priority objectives indicated in our environmental policy as well as in the Group strategy, through the progressive growth of renewable energy sources generation capacity and improvement of the eciency of infrastructures. In paicular, greenhouse gases from industrial activities can be mainly traced back to carbon dioxide (CO2 ) emissions from thermal plants and to a lesser extent to sulfur hexauoride (SF6) losses across the distribution network. Specic CO2 emissions (Scope 1) in 2020 amounted to 214 g/kWh2 (-28% compared to 2019), in line with the target ceied by the Science Based Targets initiative which the Group has set for 2030. For fuher details on greenhouse gas emissions, please refer to the chapter "Net-zero ambition".

103-2 103-3 305-7
Our commitment to improving the air quality in areas where we operate is testied by the great care we pay to the constant reduction of the main atmospheric pollutants associated with thermal production: sulfur oxides (SO2), nitrogen oxides (NOx ), and dust. To this end, over the years various measures have been taken to improve environmental pe¥ormances on specic thermal plants, resulting from an analysis, beginning from best technologies and international practices, then taking into consideration factors such as context and local priorities, the plant's operation mode, seen as annual operating hours, current plant con guration and the prospects of productive life. During 2020, total interventions amounted to 54 million euros, of which 6.5 million euros on coal-red plants. The reduction of investments on coal-red plants, compared to previous years, is linked to the progressive strategy of abandoning this technology.
With respect to actual data in 2017, beginning last year the Group set fuher targets related to the reduction of specic emissions of atmospheric pollutants by 2030, fuher strengthened this year. These new targets see specic emissions in 2030 of 0.05 g/kWh for SO2 (-94% compared to 2017), 0.24 g/kWh for NOx (-70% compared to 2017) and 0.005 g/kWh for dusts (-98% compared to 2017). Pollutant reduction trends and targets are consistent with Group decarbonization targets, in as much as they are linked to the same industrial plans.
Emission measurements are carried out in compliance with each country's regulatory framework and, in the majority of large plants, a measurement system is used that can assess compliance with the limits in real time. Its reliability is guaranteed by accredited ceifying entities and through assessments carried out by inspection authorities.
In 2020 emissions were down compared to 2019 for all the main pollutants in both absolute and specic terms, due to the already mentioned lower production from fossil fuels and the pe¥ormance of multiple eciency enhancing measures implemented on all plants in operation. Speci cally, SO2 emissions totaled 0.10 g/kWh (-88% compared to 2017), NOx emissions 0.36 g/kWh (-54% compared to 2017) and dust 0.01 g/kWh (-96% compared to 2017).
During 2020 the process of environmental risk analysis was completely digitalized through the realization and adoption at Group level of an IT tool named ERA (Environmental Risk Assessment).
On the one hand, ERA facilitates the application of a common taxonomy and methodology in the entire Enel Group for the classication and assessment of environmental risks (and oppounities) and, on the other, the integration of the risk control process and that of continuous improvement of environmental pe¥ormances between the dierent levels of the organization.
The model means that risk analysis can be carried out at single unit level (plant, local district or workplace), through the assessment of the interaction of operating assets and of processes with environmental matrices, and to assess, therefore, the robustness of the controls adopted (both mandatory and voluntary), in line with the provisions of the Environmental Management Systems. At global and Country level, the analysis is propaedeutic to the detection of the most signi cant risks, as well as to the aggregate assessment using synthetic risk indicators, thanks to which it is possible to dene a prioritization of interventions and of resources for the denition of specic plans. Thanks to the evidence emerging from the analysis of any possible environmental accidents and from periodical environmental visits to the dierent sites (ECoS), it is possible to monitor and update the assessments made and the eciency of the actions adopted.
(2) Value related only to consolidated production. In relation to the overall value of the capacity managed, CO2 emissions amount to 205 g/kWh.

Using energy in an ecient manner is, for us, a constant commitment in the entire value chain, from generation to distribution; in paicular, the strategy of reduction of consumption entails investments to increase the energy eciency of our activities, from actions to maximize the eciency of generation plants (thermal, nuclear and renewables) to the operational improvement of the distribution grid, but also through the diusion of greater awareness in behaviors (see also the chapter "Net-zero ambition"). 2020 saw the continuation of process eciency activities, followed by the implementation of operational excellence programs across the various Business Lines. Energy consumption is mainly related to fossil fuels to operate thermal power plants and by uranium to operate nuclear power plants. A limited amount of energy consumption is related to the operation of renewable energy power plants (biomass and geothermal).
The overall direct consumption of fuels for the production of electricity is 1,004,052 TJ (23.9 Mtoe). During the year there was a 21% reduction compared to 2019 of energy consumption of fuel, a dierence that reects the important decrease of generation from coal with the consequent lower contribution of this fuel. The Group's energy intensity, which provides a measure of its operational e ciency, in 2020 was 4.7 MJ/kWh, down approximately 13% compared to the previous year.
SPECIFIC EMISSIONS OF NOX (g/kWh)


(g/kWh)
Reduction of our main emissions


-98% DUST


FUEL CONSUMPTION BY PRIMARY SOURCE (,000 TJ)

(MJ/kWh)
As per last year, again in 2020 a variety of initiatives were undeaken in terms of energy eciency in all Business Lines, both for operating assets and in buildings.
For us, the strategy of energy eciency is not limited to operating sites, but also extends to the environmental sustainability of Company administrative oces. For this reason, we have equipped ourselves with a workplace handbook that collects the measures and technical references considered useful and necessary for the construction of workplaces. The fundamental principle that guides the creation of a workplace environment is, for us, care for people and for the broadest ecosystem in which they work, including also the environmental, social and economic context. Indeed, sustainability represents a fundamental driver for the design of our plants and oces, as well as for their use and end-of-life management and, through models such as that of the circular economy3, sustainability also contributes to an improvement in the quality of the external ecosystem by reducing environmental impacts and creating both economic and social value. For the purposes of ensuring the environmental sustainability of a building over its entire life cycle, the following criteria are adopted
use of circular materials and products that have low and sustainable emissions, and that come with environmental ceications, among which Life Cycle Assessment (LCA), Environmental Product Declaration (EPD) and Cradle to Cradle (C2C);
minimization of environmental impacts through the reduction of waste production and its reuse, sustainable management of water resources, containment and control of atmospheric emissions, air quality and noise;
identication of methods for the extension of the useful life of buildings and plants, through the modular design of spaces, which allows their reconguration to meet new needs;
an increase of the use factor of the building and of equipment present, through mechanisms of sharing and product as a service;
achievement, for the realization of new buildings or the restructuring of our existing buildings, of LEED and WEEL ceications. In the case of leased buildings, LEED ceication is required of the propey owner.
With paicular reference to energy eciency, where possible the following criteria are adopted;
installation of all the renewable energy sources available (photovoltaic, solar thermal, groundwater, cogeneration/intercalations) and the possibility of connecting to district heating and district cooling systems;
use of technologies that facilitate qualication of the building as a "Nearly Zero Energy Building", or be©er;
adoption of technologies with high energy eciency (for example, Energy Star ceication), favoring, where possible, technologies and equipment that ensure outputs which are over 25% higher than the market standard;
reduction of energy consumption for the production of domestic hot water with the use of renewables such as to ensure at least 50% of demand, favoring, where convenient, centralized production systems;
adoption of Energy Management Systems that facilitate continuous control of energy consumption.
In 2020, thanks to interventions of Enel X in relation to e ciency and technological innovation on public lighting systems, in Italy around 58 Gwh were saved and in Spain about 29 GWh, corresponding to a total of over 22,000 t of CO2 saved. Again in 2020, around 25,000 high energy eciency products were installed in Italy, among which condensing boilers, air conditioners and photovoltaic plants with storage systems, and about 55,000 globally between Europe and Latin America, thus avoiding atmospheric emissions of approximately 10,000 t of CO2 in Italy and 15,000 t globally.
The responsible use of water resources and their protection is vital for the safeguarding of natural ecosystems and for the wellbeing of people that live in them, as well as for the success of our activities. For this reason, it is one of the strategic objectives of our environmental policy, which pursues the adoption of an integrated approach for its optimal management.
The Group withdraws water primarily for industrial needs
The redevelopment of our Headquaers, which will last some 40 months, involves an overall su¥ace of around 80,000 mq, with a project based on innovative and sustainable principles and which aims to reduce consumption and increase the wellbeing of our people, through modern and comfoable workplaces. The objective is to design a new "work space" where people can nd the environments and technical solutions to carry out their work to the best of their abilities. Lighting and air conditioning systems, for example, will mean more comfoable conditions, and the quality of the air will be ensured through the realization of bioclimatic glasshouses. The distribution of spaces will ensure alternation of workplace environments with indoor and outdoor green spaces and areas dedicated to psycho-physical wellbeing. The rationalization of layouts will lead to a more space for services for people, including a gym, that will be added to already existing facilities (kindergaen, refreshment areas, auditorium). The level of sustainability and comfo of the building will be submi©ed for verication to external international ceication bodies, with the objective, in paicular, of obtaining LEED and WELL ceications respectively for the objectives of sustainability and wellbeing promoted, achieved and perceived.
and uses it largely for thermal and nuclear generation, for the cooling of thermal cycles, or for atmospheric emission abatement systems. Overall water needs for production are covered through withdrawal from what is referred to as non-scarce sources (seawater) and scarce sources (su¥ace freshwaters, groundwater and water for civil use). Where locally permi©ed, we use, as incoming water resources for our own processes, treated waste waters, typically supplied by water management consoia. In the international context, since 2014 Enel has been among the endorsing companies of the CEO Water Mandate, an initiative of the UN Global Compact devised to suppo companies in the development, implementation and disclosure of practices and policies concerning the sustainable management of water. SPECIFIC WATER WITHDRAWALS (l/kWh) 0.2 0.15 -59% -65%


In 2020 the overall withdrawal4 of process and closed-cycle cooling water was 51.5 Mm3, a reduction of around 54% compared to 2017, while specic water withdrawal were 0.20 l/kWh (down 55% compared to 2017 and in line with the Group's water requirement reduction target). This reduction is mainly due to lower thermal production, in particular coal-red. 2017 2018 2019 2020 2030
We have energetically pursued the objective of reducing our specic water withdrawals as early as 2010, a commitment renewed in 2020, reducing fuher the previously set objective up to a reduction of 65% in 2030 compared to the value in 2017. This renewed commitment is based on the results reached and on the Industrial Plan, which provides for eciency in the use of water in existing thermal plants, the evolution of the energy mix towards renewables, and the progressive reduction of generation from fossil fuels.

vs 2017 vs 2017
(3) Please refer also to the chapter "Circular economy".
(4) The specic water withdrawal is composed by all the water withdrawal quotas from su¥ace (including recovered rain water) and groundwater sources, by third paies, from the sea and from wastewater (quota for third pay procurements) used for processes and for closed-cycle cooling, except the quota of seawater discharged back into sea after the desalination process (brine). This la©er item (brine) contributes to the quota of withdrawals.
The Group is commi©ed to the progressive reduction of its water needs in all of its production processes, where possible promoting its internal reuse. Among the optimization interventions realized, in some coal-red power stations the blowdown from the closed-circuit cooling towers is reused in desulphurization plants, whereas the use of crystallizers downstream of the desulphurizers allows for the total recovery of the wastewater. Fuhermore, in other plants the storage tanks have been destined to the collection of rainwater, in this way making it available for process needs. Fuher, we are constantly monitoring all our production sites located in zones at risk of water scarcity (water stressed areas) in order to ensure that water resources can be managed as eciently as possible. Mapping of production sites falling within water stressed areas is done in line with the criteria of GRI 303 (2018) with reference to The percentage of water withdrawn in water stress areas6 is 22.9% of total withdrawals in 2020, down compared to 2019 (25.4%).
In 2020, the Global Power Generation launched the WaVE (Water Value Enhancement) project with the aim of mapping needs and water withdrawal sources in all of its thermal and renewables production sites in order to set new objectives to reduce its water footprint through the planning of a series of specic and innovative improvement actions, with paicular reference to water stressed areas.
the conditions of "(baseline) Water Stress" indicated by the World Resources Institute Aqueduct Water Risk Atlas5. Among the sites identied, those dened as "critical" are those positioned in water stressed areas and which withdraw fresh water for process needs; for these sites, therefore, methods for managing water resources are analyzed for the purposes of minimizing consumption and maximizing withdrawals from sources of lower quality or which are non-scarce (wastewater, industrial or seawater). WATER WITHDRAWALS BY SOURCE 2020 (51.5 Mm3) 43.2% 0.1% 28.2%
In 2020, approximately 11% of the total energy produced by the Enel Group used freshwater in "water stressed" areas6. In these areas, withdrawals from scarce sources amounted to 11 Mm3, with a reduction of 39% compared to 2019 (18 Mm3 (7 )). 17.5% 11.0%
The impoant expansion of the solar power plants, naturally destined for location also in "water stressed" areas, has highlighted a new use of water connected with the cleaning of dust deposits on the su¥aces of photovoltaic panels. Although dealing with very small volumes, for these plants Enel has adopted innovative solutions targeted at fuher reducing water needs. Suace water (wetlands, lakes, rivers) Ground water (from wells) Seawater (used as is and desalinated) Water from aqueducts Wastewater
(6) The percentage of energy produced in water stressed areas, as well as the percentage of water withdrawn in water stressed areas, is calculated by including thermal plants that use water from scarce sources.
(7) The previously described WRI criteria have led, in most geographical zones where the Group is present, to a signicant broadening of the areas placed in water stress conditions and, consequently, the values of the preceding Company indicators have been recalculated compared to the previous year, when the same classication was used through the use of the Global Water Tool of World Business Council for Sustainable Development. The value of consumption in 2019 was therefore recalculated with respect to the new criterion.

SPECIFIC WATER WITHDRAWALS (l/kWh)

The Rubí solar plant (145 MW) is located in the Moquegua district in Peru, in a zone classified as being of high water stress and at an altitude of 1,481 meters. The reduction in withdrawals of water for the washing of panels was here pursued through the adoption of software that, by measuring the loss of efficiency of each panel, estimates the surface deposit of dust and programs washing priorities. For the periodical washing of the panels, a dry technology was therefore chosen, which uses mechanized brushing systems, thus reducing washing with water to just once a year. Finally, in order to satisfy this latter need, a device was installed that is capable of condensing atmospheric moisture, from which the necessary water is obtained. The adoption of these solutions, with the envisaged execution during the year of five dry washing cycles and only one with water condensed from the air, ensures, on the one hand, the energy efficiency of the plant and, on the other, its complete autonomy from the scarce water resources available, which in this way are reserved for the priority needs of the local population. An equally important challenge is the one we have undertaken on the solar plants in Pampa Norte, Lalackama, Finis Terrae and Chañares (358 MW overall), situated on the Atacama plateau in Chile, a desert zone at a height ranging from 2,400 to 4,200 meters. Here, in 2020, an innovation project was launched for the recovery of water contained in night mists, typical of the area, identifying the most suitable areas for this type of recovery and testing the performances of diverse capture technology solutions. The final objective, even in this case, is to reduce to zero the procurement from natural sources of the water needed for the solar panel washing and to achieve an overproduction to destine towards other uses, to the benefit of the local community. Another simple and brilliant technological solution implemented on all solar plants in Chile has concerned changing their night positioning (solar night parking). Having changed their inclination during the day to maximize exposure to the sun, the solar tracking plants are normally made park in a horizontal position during the night. This is a configuration assigned by international manufacturers in order to reduce exposure to the wind, considered the main risk factor for the plant. But in the Atacama desert, where the main danger is the dust that deposits on the panels, and which reduces their output, this rest position has been set at 45°; a simple solution, that has significantly reduced the deposit of material and favored the self-washing phenomena that exploit the noteworthy night mist.
To search constantly for new solutions to increase the internal reuse of process waters is the renewed commitment requested by the WaVE project from all thermal plants with a view to reducing their water requirements. The Santa Barbara Plant (392 MW) in Italy uses water mainly from the operation of evaporative cooling towers. The availability of water is, however, reduced, depending on the level of the overlying basin of the San Cipriano dam, and the restitution of water to the valley water body is often limited by the need to contain its thermal rise, especially in periods of low flow. The plant has managed to change the functioning of the cooling towers by means of new treatment of the evaporative cycle water and an advanced system of checking and regulation capable of monitoring and controlling the chemical-physical parameters of the recirculated water in real time. These interventions have facilitated an increase in the number of concentration cycles of the evaporative towers, leading to a 15% reduction of make-up water, as well as the flowrate of the water discharged. Similar initiatives are planned for the Pietrafitta (Italy) and Ventanilla (Peru) plants.
The Mahón plant operates on the island of Minorca, in the Balearic Islands, an area classified as of high water stress due to the scarce availability of the natural resource, together with high demographic pressure. The recent installation on the plant of nitrogen oxide (NOx ) abatement systems, requiring water to operate, could have increased the impact. The solution adopted, therefore, was that of utilizing the wastewater coming from the nearby municipal wastewater treatment plant to feed the emission abatement system, in this way avoiding withdrawal from scarce water sources and recovering wastewater that would otherwise have been discharged into the sea.

(5) GRI 303 has dened as "water stressed" areas those in which, on the basis of the classication provided by the WRI Aqueduct Water Risk Atlas, the ratio between the total annual withdrawal of su¥ace water or groundwater for dierent uses (civil, industrial, agricultural and livestock) and the total annual renewable water supply available ("base water stress", understood, therefore, as the level of competition between all users, is high (40-80%) or extremely high (>80%). By way of greater environmental protection, we have also considered as located in water stressed areas those plants falling in zones classied by the WRI as "arid".

At a Glance Our ESG peormance Trend Topic Appendix
Downstream of internal recoveries and reuses, wastewater discharged from the plants is returned to the su¥ace water body. Discharge always takes place downstream of a treatment process that removes any pollutants present to a level where they will not have a negative impact on the receiving water body, in compliance with the limits provided for under national regulations and by operating permits.
Hydroelectric power plants activities are an impoant element of water management. These plants, which do not contribute to the Group's water consumption due to the fact that water withdrawn is completely returned to its source, provide a series of additional services for society compared to the sole generation of renewable energies. In fact, several plants, with a joint management in collaboration with public stakeholders and private entities, manage the water resource for multi-purpose services ranging from ood control, drinking water and irrigation, re prevention services, to the management of river waste held by retention works, also including numerous cultural, leisure and nature-based initiatives, made possible thanks to the presence of the plants. The reservoirs of hydroelectric plants carry out a vital role in the response to the eects of climate change, increasing the level of protection of the communities subject to increasingly frequent severe ooding and to prolonged periods of drought. Management of the outows from hydroelectric plants is done through specic programs to ensure the volumes of water required to preserve the ecological state of rivers (minimum vital ows).
Optimal waste management is a strategic objective of our environmental policy, which results in a constant commitment to the reduction of waste production, as well as to the denition of new methods of reuse, recycling and recovery in the perspective of a circular economy.
With the aim of fuher strengthening this commitment, we have equipped ourselves with a Group Guideline for Waste Management, which collects the best Company practices deemed fundamental for optimal waste management. In paicular, we have set key objectives for the reduction of waste produced, which were fuher reduced last year (-87% of waste produced in 2030 compared to 2017), equal to 1.2 mil t produced in 2030 (excluded from this target is waste produced from the demolition of decommissioned thermal plants). The reduction method takes into account the results already obtained and of the envisaged evolution of the production mix towards renewable energies, as indicated in the three-year Industrial Plan. The target value includes the technological upgrading of renewables plants, especially wind farms, that will reach end-of-life over the next few years.

The Noguera Pallaresa is a river in noh-eastern Spain. It has its source in the Pyrenees and joins the Segre, a tributary of the Ebro. The river ows into the county of Pallars Sobirà in the province of Lleida (Catalonia), a region with a strong vocation for tourism, in paicular active tourism, water and adventure spos. The success of these spos is made possible thanks to the excellent regulation of the water ow released from the basis of the hydroelectric plants (Torrassa and Llavorsí, 10 and 52 MW respectively) managed by Enel-Endesa on these rivers, ensuring the continuous and safe practice of these activities over the entire tourist season, and the organization of spos events, including national ones.
The regulation of water for leisure-social uses requires constant supervision of the hydroelectric plants and their hydraulic infrastructures, together with a reliable system of communication between the plants on the Noguera Pallaresa and the Control Centre situated in Lleida. The la©er in paicular constantly processes evaluation models for the water owrate required, taking into account the orography and the current ow conditions of the river, the levels of accumulation in the basin that depend on seasonal weather conditions, as well as electricity production needs and the fuher services guaranteed, such as irrigation and supply of water to the population. From this complex evaluation one can determine, in an entirely automated and remote controlled manner, the volume of water released through the hydroelectric plant turbines, which makes possible the leisure-social use of the river with the contemporaneous generation of 100% renewable electricity.
During 2020, waste production was reduced notably due to the reduction of the contribution of coal ash and desulphurization gypsum, the overall production of which went from 5.0 mil t in 2019 to 0.8 mil t in 2020, with a reduction of 84% (-87% compared to 2017).
Waste sent for recovery within the entire scope of the Company was equal to 65.7%, a strong improvement compared to data for the previous year (24% in 2019), also thanks to the adoption of management measures.
The commitment to a continuous increase in the percentile recovery of waste products is fundamental to ensure an ecient transition towards a circular economy in order to minimize the exploitation of natural resources in accordance with sustainable objectives and in combating climate change. A fundamental role in this area is played by process waste recovery deriving from thermal power generation. This is signicant in terms of both quantities produced and their characteristics. These mainly include coal ash and desulfurization gypsum, reused in building works to produce cement, concrete and bricks according to specic technical and environmental control requirements. In paicular, the percentage sent for recovery is, respectively, 74% for coal ash (from 22% in 2019) and 63% for desulphurization gypsum (from 33% in 2019)8.
Many other maintenance wastes are sent for complete recovery from the thermal plants such as waste oils, a large number of metal waste products, iron, copper, aluminum as well as waste from primary ltration processes in the hydroelectric plants. An impoant commitment was fuhermore undeaken last year to focus on ensuring the recovery of waste produced from demolition and dismantling of end-of-life power plants, by using selective demolition techniques of the structures, as well as solutions to make the best use of the materials produced.
In order to improve fuher the Group's pe¥ormances over the next few years in terms of reduction of waste produced and to increase the rate of recovery, in 2020 Global Power Generation Division launched the project "ZERO WASTE". This project, which has been extended to all the countries in which the Group is present and for each technology and plant, has set the objective of analyzing waste production and management processes, classication and nal destination on the basis of regulatory and market conditions in each country, in order to identify points for improvement, and also share and promote the diusion of best practices and the denition of specic objectives and intervention programs.

(1) These targets exclude waste produced from the decommissioning of thermal plants.
(8) The variations in the percentages of recovery compared to the previous year are due to plants sold or shut down in the period.
An increasingly greater eo has in paicular been made to acquire, in a life cycle perspective, transparent and comparable information on the environmental impact of the substances and of products procured. Similarly, increasing focus was also placed on the adoption of the Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR) models, including in relation to the post-use phases of the products and services provided. Of paicular interest in relation to this was the Enel X commitment using a model integrated with the e-mobility services which ensured a rigorous and ecient end-of-life management of electric car recharging infrastructures (box stations, pole stations, fast-recharges) and their recovery through membership, in Europe, of WEEE (Waste Electrical and Electronic Equipment) and ba©ery recovery consoia. As regards the waste generated by management of the electricity distribution grid, recovery programs have been reinforced, in paicular for dielectric mineral oils, used as insulation in electric equipment, and accumulators, utilized as energy reserve in transformer stations. These oils are sent to companies registered/authorized for regeneration and waste-to-energy treatment, where regeneration is not possible, whereas the end-of-life accumulators are sent to registered/authorized companies that can recover secondary raw materials. Paicularly relevant within the scope of the Infrastructure & Networks Business Line are the results obtained by the projects launched across various countries for the sustainable replacement of intelligent rst-generation meters and the recovery of their constituent materials.
For fuher initiatives, see the chapters "Circular economy" and "Sustainable supply chain" in the present document. Fuhermore, during 2020 we proceeded with our commitment for the elimination of disposable plastic in the Group, initiated with launch of the "Zero Plastic" project in June 2019, in parallel with World Environment Day. As of today, the project has involved the main oces (with over 20 employees) in Italy and Spain, and will be extended progressively to all the countries and operating oces, involving, for its success, tens of thousands of people, and placing us in the front line in the global commitment to ensure a be©er planet. In 2020, the reduction of disposable plastic in oces (including cafés, canteens and beverage and food dispensers) can be estimated at 75% in Italy and 64% in Spain compared to the year of reference (2018), thanks to interventions for the replacement of the products supplied. Following the almost exclusive recourse to home working in the large oces, as a response to the Covid-19 pandemic, it was not, however, possible to carry out actual measurements. Fuhermore, precisely in view of possible specic health security requirements to be adopted as precautionary measures on the return to work of sta, however paial, the targets previously set for the following years have been appropriately updated, while awaiting a complete return to working normality.
The pandemic linked to Covid has also introduced a new type of waste in operating oces kept active for electricity service continuity needs. This new type of waste is made up of mandatory personal protection devices (face masks and disposable gloves) distributed by the Company in all workplaces in order to prevent the spread of the contagion. Management of this waste was based everywhere on principles of maximum precaution, in line with the development of provisions and health requirements issued in the dierent countries.
103-2 103-3
The protection, monitoring and remediation of the soil, the subsoil and of groundwater in areas where our plants and production and service facilities are, for us, a priority, to ensure the safeguarding of ecosystems and the health of people. The protection of these environment matrices guides all the phases of a plant's life, from design choices to construction, operation and end-of-life management. Both active and passive protection and safety measures will be used in project phase to prevent any possible form of uncontrolled or accidental contact of potentially polluting substances (fuels, reagents, liquid and waste ows) with soils and subterranean waters.
During plant operations, every process will undergo compliance controls as well as ongoing upgrades as required by the Environmental Management Systems to prevent and minimize the risks of any potential environmental contamination. At the same time, control plans are executed to monitor the conditions of the environmental matrices. In the event of an accident, for example the accidental spillage of polluting substances, the timely application of the Stop Work and Emergency Management Policies allows elimination of any possible environmental impact, rigorously complying with the provisions and the legal obligations of the various countries.
As regards the end of life of power plants, once they have
been secured and prior to their being dismantled and the area reassigned to new development projects, we proceed, according to the authorized provisions and legal requirements of the various countries, to verify fuher the environmental quality of the soil, subsoil and groundwater in the areas where the plant is located. In the case of potential contamination, on the basis of intervention plans shared with the competent authority and supervisory bodies, and turning to specialist and qualied companies, a characterization of environmental matrices in the areas of potential interest is carried out, and, if necessary, securing and subsequent remediation measures capable of quickly restoring a suitable quality status for the planned use of the area (industrial/commercial, residential) are realized. Paicular focus is on power plants falling within the large industrial hubs.


In order to mitigate fuher the risk connected to the detention and consequent potential release of substances that can have an impact on the environment, numerous projects have commenced for their progressive substitution, for example, verications on the possible use of vegetable (hence biodegradable) oil, replacing the traditional dielectric oil of mineral origin, as insulation in electric equipment.
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| At a Glance | Our ESG peormance | Trend Topic | Appendix |
TOT

| concerned | Aquatic | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Projects | Project type | Species concerned | Ecosystems | No. of species at risk | |||||||
| Country | No. of projects |
Of which voluntary |
Monitoring | Restoration (habitat) |
Conservation (species) |
Classe | Tipo | (CR) Critically endangered |
(EN) Endangered |
||
| Italy | 25 | 68% | 5 | 1 | 19 | Prairie, Forest, Shrub, AŒiŽcial, Inland wetland//freshwater rivers and lakes |
2 | 3 | |||
| Spainna | 28 | 89% | 10 | 8 | 10 | Forest, Shrub, Prairie, Rocky area, AŒiŽcial Inland wetland/freshwater rivers and lakes |
1 | 2 | |||
| Romania | 11 | 91% | 1 | - | 10 | Forest, Prairie, cultivated land Inland wetland/freshwater rivers and lakes |
- | 1 | |||
| Grecee | 3 | - | 3 | - | - | Forest, Prairie, Shrub, Rocky area | - | 2 | |||
| Brazil | 72 | 14% | 52 | 16 | 4 | Forest, Prairie, Shrub, AŒiŽcial Savannah Inland wetland/freshwater rivers and lakes |
- | 6 | |||
| Chile | 16 | 25% | 11 | 4 | 1 | Forest, Shrub, DeseŒ, Prairie Inland wetland/freshwater rivers and lakes |
- | - | |||
| Colombia | 12 | 25% | 3 | 5 | 4 | Forest, Savannah, uncultivated area Inland wetland/freshwater rivers and lakes |
3 | 5 | |||
| Argentina | 1 | - | - | 1 | - | Forest | - | - | |||
| Peru | 3 | - | 3 | - | - | Forest, DeseŒ Inland wetland/freshwater rivers and lakes |
- | - | |||
| South Africa |
4 | - | 2 | 2 | - | Prairie, Shrub, Forest | - | 2 | |||
| No…h America |
5 | 20% | 4 | 1 | - | Prairie, Shrub, Forest | - | 2 | |||
| Panama | 2 | - | - | 2 | - | Foresta | - | - | |||
| Guatemala | 1 | - | 1 | - | - | Forest | - | - | |||
| Mexico | 3 | - | 2 | 1 | - | Shrub | - | - | |||
| Russia | 1 | - | - | - | 1 | Inland wetland/freshwater rivers and lakes |
- | - |

| information on the conservation status of various species. Near | Least | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Terrestrial ecosystems |
Coastal marine ecosystems |
Aquatic ecosystems |
In pericolo Critico (CR) |
In Pericolo (EN) |
Vulnerabile (VU) |
Quasi Minacciata (NT) |
Minor Preoccupazione (LC) |
|||||||
| Species concerned |
Fauna Terrestrial |
Fauna Aquatic |
Avifauna | Ichythofauna | Chiroptera | Flora Terrestrial |
Flora Marine |
|||||||
| Project type | Species concerned | Ecosystems | No. of species at risk | |||||||||||
| voluntary | Monitoring | Restoration (habitat) |
Conservation (species) |
Classe | Tipo | (CR) Critically endangered |
(EN) Endangered |
(VU) Vulnerable |
(NT) Near threatened |
(LC) Least concern |
TOT | |||
| 68% | 5 | 1 | 19 | Prairie, Forest, Shrub, AŒiŽcial, Inland wetland//freshwater rivers and lakes |
2 | 3 | - | 1 | 18 | 24 | ||||
| 89% | 10 | 8 | 10 | Forest, Shrub, Prairie, Rocky area, AŒiŽcial Inland wetland/freshwater rivers and lakes |
1 | 2 | 8 | 15 | 365 | 391 | ||||
| 91% | 1 | - | 10 | Forest, Prairie, cultivated land Inland wetland/freshwater rivers and lakes |
- | 1 | 5 | 7 | 13 | 26 | ||||
| - | 3 | - | - | Forest, Prairie, Shrub, Rocky area | - | 2 | 7 | 11 | 176 | 196 | ||||
| 14% | 52 | 16 | 4 | Forest, Prairie, Shrub, AŒiŽcial Savannah Inland wetland/freshwater rivers and lakes |
- | 6 | 20 | 14 | 1,169 | 1,209 | ||||
| 25% | 11 | 4 | 1 | Forest, Shrub, DeseŒ, Prairie Inland wetland/freshwater rivers and lakes |
- | - | 2 | 2 | 54 | 58 | ||||
| 25% | 3 | 5 | 4 | Forest, Savannah, uncultivated area Inland wetland/freshwater rivers and lakes |
3 | 5 | 29 | 11 | 534 | 582 | ||||
| - | - | 1 | - | Forest | - | - | - | - | - | - | ||||
| - | 3 | - | - | Forest, DeseŒ Inland wetland/freshwater rivers and lakes |
- | - | - | 1 | 1 | 2 | ||||
| - | 2 | 2 | - | Prairie, Shrub, Forest | - | 2 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 6 | ||||
| 20% | 4 | 1 | - | Prairie, Shrub, Forest | - | 2 | 1 | 5 | 28 | 36 | ||||
| - | - | 2 | - | Foresta | - | - | - | - | - | - | ||||
| - | 1 | - | - | Forest | - | - | - | - | - | - | ||||
| - | 2 | 1 | - | Shrub | - | - | - | 1 | - | 1 | ||||
| - | - | - | 1 | Inland wetland/freshwater rivers and lakes |
- | - | - | - | - | - | ||||
| 37% | 6 | 23 | 73 | 69 | 2,360 | 2,531 |
| Ecosystems | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Terrestrial | Coastal marine | Aquatic | In pericolo |
| ecosystems | ecosystems | ecosystems | Critico (CR) |
The Red List, compiled by the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN), provides
187 97 41 49
103-2 103-3 304-4
Protection of biodiversity is one of the strategic objectives of our environmental policy and is regulated by a specic where the plants are situated and hence to the reduction of hydro erosion and deseication.
Fuhermore, we are commi©ed to maintaining the management of biodiversity aligned with the best practices in the sector and, in this perspective, we have equipped ourselves with the Group Guideline that delineates the principles and key procedures for the management of impacts on biodiversity during the entire life cycle of the plants, from the development of new ones to operations and decommissioning.
Fuhermore, with the aim of involving and raising awareness among all workers on the topics of protection and conservation of biodiversity, a program of specialist training was launched with the involvement of over 300 people, with dierent technical proles and expeise, involved in the management and conservation of the biodiversity in local areas.
In 2020 we continued with 187 projects for the protection of species and natural habitats in plants in operation, of which 54 developed in panership with government entities, NOGs and universities, for an overall capital expenditure of 9 million euros and a su¥ace of 4,356 hectares involved in habitat recovery, of which around half concerning ecological restoration and reforestation, mainly in Colombia, Brazil and Chile. The su¥ace subject to restoration in 2020 has more than tripled compared to the previous year (1,300 hectares in 2019), both for the activation of new restoration projects and for the eective increase of the su¥aces subject to restoration in the ambit of projects already active beforehand. The projects mainly concern Brazil, Chile, Spain and Italy, in paicular on hydroelectric plants, wind farms and distribution grids. Examples of the biodiversity mitigation measures through the related policy are available on the site's Sustain-

ability section (h©ps://www.enel.com/investors/biodiversity). Several measures have been implemented as early as worksite phase, others envisage compensations in the long term (e.g. the ecological restoration project and repopulation at the El Quimbo plant).
In addition to biodiversity projects developed with reference to plants in operation, in 2020 87 projects were developed for the construction of renewable energy plants, mainly in Brazil. Spain and Chile, targeted at the conservation and monitoring of native species impacted, for an overall capital expenditure of 3.7 million euros.
For the purposes of fuher improving our environmental performances, we are pa of initiatives and cooperations at international level. Among these, in 2020 the Company joined the coalition Business For Nature, with the aim of suppoing the commitment to protection of nature and biodiversity through the denition of new global objectives in accordance with the Strategic Agenda 2030. On the occasion of the 75th General Assembly, the Group has signed the Call to Action "Nature is everyone's business" promoted by the coalition, whose objective is to demonstrate the commitment of the private sector to the protection of nature, and to urge governments to adopt ambitious biodiversity policies. Fuhermore, we have decided to join the international consoium of the Science Based Targets Network (SBTN), an initiative which, on the track of the Science Based targets initiative (SBTi) in the area of climate change, will dene a process for identifying specic improvement targets for the conservation of nature and biodiversity.
Recently a series of initiatives was launched, targeted at the denition of metrics and approaches for the evaluation of the sustainability of economic sectors compared to impacts on biodiversity. Among them, the most signi cant ones are the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD), which is developing the strategic framework post-2020 in line with the objectives of Agenda 2030, that will be presented at the next Conference of the Paies 15 (COP), the World Economic Forum (WEF) which sets the benchmark metrics for the use of soil and water and, in the ambit of the European Commission, the denition of the taxonomy on biodiversity, which, by the end of 2021, will provide a common classication of economic activities that contribute to protecting and restoring biodiversity and ecosystems.
Within this context, for the purpose of aligning with the international state of the a and being precursors in fohcoming developments, we have commenced a process of verication and adoption of metrics and indicators of the impact of our own assets, such as the occupation of soil and the transformation of natural habitats, robust and scalable at various levels (from new sites under construction to those in operation) and that can be aggregated from single sites to Group level.
The policy was published in 2015 in line with the goals of the United Nations Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD), the 2011-2020 Biodiversity Plan and the Aichi Biodiversity Targets.
ed to:
planning for activities that may inteere with species and natural habitats, while respecting the principle of mitigation hierarchy, which is a commitment to avoid and prevent negative impacts on biodiversity through the following actions:
oseing residual negative impacts;
carrying out work to oset residual impacts while respecting the principle of "no net loss" of biodiversity and, where applicable, achieving a positive net balance;
peorming Environmental Impact Studies for each new plant, including an assessment of the eects on biotopes, animal and plant species, in order to avoid operating in areas of high natural value, and adopting the best solutions to limit the impact on biodiversity;
collaborating with local communities, research centres and environmental and territorial associations to identify the
biodiversity value and develop studies and projects to protect and enhance it;
monitoring the eectiveness of the measures taken to protect and conserve biodiversity; regularly repoing on its biodiversity peormance.
protection of species and natural habitats
187 projects for the PRO JECTS
4 thousand hectares of habitat recovered over
policy9 adopted since 2015 and which denes the guidelines in the entire Group.
We have consolidated experience in the management and protection of biodiversity on our production sites, an activity which over the past few years has been focused on the renewables segment and on grids in an increasingly large number of countries. In the Group's plants and installations with a long-term presence in the area, vast scale monitoring continues in order to prevent impacts on ecosystems. In relation to new plants, and in paicular renewable ones, the potential exposure to a biodiversity risk is highlighted during the feasibility analysis phase, taking into account the geographic closeness of the sites to protected or impoant biodiversity areas, and the potential presence of endangered species. This evaluation is pa of a more extensive analysis for the application of the "Creating Shared Value" model through which the Company engages with the socio-economic and environmental requirements of the territory, dening the project to create long-term values for itself and for the local communities. Once in operation, protection of biodiversity becomes an integral pa of environmental management, through periodical management for the checking of impacts highlighted in authorization phase. This is also the phase in which the plant consolidates its relationship with the local area and where initiatives are developed, such as voluntary projects, to safeguard local species based on the knowledge of the environment surrounding the site.
In addition, the Group brings forward a series of innovative activities targeted at improving the integration of renewable energy plants with the environment and the landscape, for example through the use of natural solutions based on mixes of deep rooting seeds easily integrated in dierent climates, aimed at improvement of the quality of soils
(9) The policy is also available at the following link: h©ps://www. enel.com/en/investors/sustainability/topics-pe¥ormance-sustainability/biodiversity.
Hydrogen is becoming of renewed impoance as a possible energy carrier for the decarbonization of those sectors of the economy that cannot be technically or economically electried, or what are referred to as the "hard to abate" sectors, such as the chemical industry, which uses hydrogen as a raw material, industry that needs high temperature heat, or maritime transpo or aviation. Green hydrogen is a suppo for achieving full decarbonization of end-user consumption, and not an alternative to this. Indeed, electri cation remains the cheapest and simplest way to decarbonize large poions of total consumption of nal energy. The processes of hydrogen production are not, however, all equal in terms of emissions, since they are linked to the use or otherwise of fossil fuels. Only the use of "green hydrogen", produced using electricity deriving exclusively from renewable energy sources through the process of electrolysis of water, does not entail emissions and is an ideal complement to decarbonization.
Heading in this direction are the new industrial strategy for Europe presented by the European Commission in March 2020, followed by the EU communication Hydrogen Strategy, and the creation of the Clean Hydrogen Alliance of July 2020: both communications assign a central role to hydrogen in the energy transition.
Beginning from our position of leadership in the production of electricity from renewable sources, we have decided to focus on this new oppounity, along the entire value chain, by promoting the development of projects in which

the production of renewable energy is integrated with the production of zero emissions green hydrogen. The green hydrogen produced can then be sold to industrial clients who can thus abate the CO2 emissions of their production processes.
A fuher advantage of this business model is that hydrogen cannot only be used as fuel or as a clean raw material, but can also facilitate a fuher penetration of renewable energy. Indeed, a solar plant or wind farm coupled with an electrolyzer can provide grid services similar to those of a renewable plant combined with a ba©ery, thus oering greater exibility to the electric system.
There are two possible models of integration under examination: in the rst, the electrolyzers are realized at a renewable energy production plant, in a fully integrated system which, however, requires localization in the vicinity of a point of use to make transpo less expensive; in the second, the electrolyzer is realized directly by the user of the hydrogen, supplying renewable energy through the electric grid, with the advantage of having lower localization restrictions. The choice of the most suitable model is linked to the conditions of each specic project.
With the objective of exploiting the potential for growth of this new sector, we envisage in our development plans the installation of over 2 GW of electrolyzers by 2030, of which 120 MW already in 2023.
To achieve these ambitious targets, we have begun to develop projects in dierent Countries where we are present, including through collaboration with several of the main players active in the eld of hydrogen.
The main objective of the LIFE Danube Free Sky project is to reduce the risk from electric lines for birdlife through monitoring and awareness raising, and by means of direct interventions of the electric lines in the areas with the highest environmental value. The project is pa of a broad transnational cooperation along one of the most migratory corridors, stopover sites and places for wintering for many bird species in Europe: the Danube Delta. The project commenced in September 2020 and has received funding from the LIFE Program of the EU, involving 14 paners from 7 countries of the Balkans area and Central Eastern Europe, among which research institutes, electricity distribution companies, local administrations and protected natural areas. Through our Romanian Company E-Distribuție Dobrogea, we paicipate in the panership with activities in the region of Dobrogea, Romania. In paicular there will be interventions on 40 km of lines with the inseion of insulating sheaths and other elements to reduce collision with electric lines, in a multi-year program the conclusion of which is predicted for 2026.
Operating the grids at high and medium voltage requires the maintenance of the surrounding areas, with the need to thin vegetation to ensure the safety and accessibility to said areas. For this reason, authorizations in areas of paicular environmental value always have more stringent requirements in order to protect habitats and species. This is the case in the Rio Grande do Sul region in Brazil, in which Enel Cien, in line with the requirements set by the Ministry of the Environment, carries out compensation works in the areas of relevance of transmission and distribution lines. Speci cally, the interventions envisage forestation with native forest species to protect plant biodiversity in areas protected and inhabited by indigenous populations. Currents projects entail the inseion of more than 100,000 specimens to compensate for the activities carried out over the previous ve years (from April 2015 to March 2020). In 2020 reforestation projects were already under way on the Rio Grande do Sul with more than 80,000 trees planted to recreate forest habitats for transition between the Mata Atlântica habitat and the biome Pampa (IL Serrinha, Erval Grande, São Luiz Gonzaga). In 2021 fuher interventions are planned in order to complete the forestation objectives set.
In the area of developing innovative solutions that unite the growth of largescale photovoltaic plants (PV) with the sustainable use of the soil and the protection of biodiversity, the Global Power Generation Division, through Open Innovation, in 2020 launched a parallel experimentation program in Spain, Italy and Greece which involves the best global paners in the world of research, industry, non prot associations and sta-ups. It commenced in January 2021. With agri-voltaic systems, we have set ourselves the objective of mitigating the impact of photovoltaic plants in terms of taking up soil, promoting its use with the ne-tuning of agro-livestock solutions that use the free spaces between the lines of panels without any variations to the layout of the plant and to build shared value for local communities in a circular economy perspective. With a multi-stakeholder collaborative approach, be©er crops are being studied in relation to solar technologies, to environmental conditions and to the method of harvesting agricultural products, involving local farms and strategic players. The nal objective is to dene optimal models for the integrated and sustainable management of operations and maintenance of PV and agricultural plants. The massive data collection will form the basis of a database to suppo decision-making for the adoption of the best business model, in relation to solar technology, the climate area and the analysis of the social, economic and environmental context.
The Delna wind farm in Brazil is set within a priority area for the conservation of biodiversity in the Caatinga biome. Since 2016 a research project has been carried out with our patronage in panership with federal and state public authorities and with the rural communities to ensure the long-term survival of jaguars of two dierent species (Panthera onca and Puma concolor) recognized to be at risk of extinction. The aim of the project is to map the areas suitable for the presence of these species and of the critical areas of conict with human activities that put their conservation at risk. One of the main threats, indeed, is death induced by man due to the depredation of ca©le. Through the use of technologies via satellite and GPS collars, the movements of the felines are monitored and inte¥erence is mitigated. The project also aims to improve understanding of the behavior in nature of these wild animals; to this end, an environmental education program with 24 seminars and the involvement of six local communities has made it possible to raise the awareness of over 200 locals of the impoance of protecting these species.


In Chile, the Group paicipates in the High Innovative Fuels (HIF) panership with the Chilean groups AME and ENAP (Empresa Nacional del Petróleo), together with Siemens Energy and Porsche. The Group will contribute to the innovative pilot project of HIF for the production of sustainable fuels, focusing on wind energy and on the installation of an electrolyzer for the production of green hydrogen. The electrolyzer powered by wind energy and that feeds the pilot project with green hydrogen will be situated in Cabo Negro, noh of Punta Arenas, in the region of Magallanes. The plant should enter into operation in 2022 and will be the largest plant of its type for producing green hydrogen in Latin America.
In Italy the Enel Group and the Eni Group are planning to produce green hydrogen by means of electrolyzers powered by renewable energy. The electrolyzers will be
located near two Eni reneries that will use them to decarbonize the process. Both projects will be characterized by an electrolyzer of about 10 MW and it is hoped that green hydrogen will begin to be generated by 2022- 2023. Again in Italy, we intend also to work with the energy infrastructure company Snam and other players to explore other applications for green hydrogen.
In Spain, the Enel Group is assessing numerous development projects, including on several existing plants. The most advanced project is that of As Pontes, which will have an electrolyzer of 100 MW and six associated wind farms, with an overall capacity of 611 MW, the construction of which will see the creation of 1,6000 jobs during the 18 months of construction.
We have also joined the Clean Hydrogen Alliance, promoted by the European Commission, with the aim of promoting green hydrogen and stimulating the realization of projects in order to be able to reach the targets set in the EU Hydrogen Strategy. The organization has seen the adhesion of numerous paicipants, both public and private, and its division into 6 topic based round tables: we take pa in paicular in the round table on "hydrogen production", which aims to identify the types of projects to promote and the current regulatory and economic barriers present.

ity and the calculation of the mean consumptions of vehicles from a recent ocial study by the Milan Polytechnic University. The ndings compare the kilometers that can be traveled with the average emissions from endothermic vehicles circulating in Italy published annually by ISPRA (Istituto Superiore per la Protezione e la Ricerca Ambientale - The Italian Institute for Environmental Protection and Research) net of the CO2 and of the other main pollutants (PMx e NOx ) emi©ed to produce energy based on the national energy mix. To reinforce the algorithm, Enel X conveed the amount of CO2 saved from the environment into the number of trees that would have absorbed that same quantity of emissions over a year. The result is measured by the relationship between the quantity of CO2 a tree absorbs1 and those of emissions saved, thereby obtaining the number of equivalent trees which contribute to the "fourwheel forest" which every Enel X client creates by responsible behavior towards their surrounding environment.
This algorithm was developed in Italy, but was designed to be used in other countries taking into account the average CO2 emissions of the vehicle eet circulating in the area (CO2 /km) and the emissions of the national energy mix (CO2 /kWh), as well as for the other main pollutants linked to mobility (PMx e NOx ). The dashboard is available for users on the homepage of the Enel X website; the calculation of the CO2 saved by each individual recharging session is available on the JuicePass app and on the Recharge Manager poal, dedicated to businesses and public services.
Thanks to the recharges, the emission of about 15,500 tCO2 , equivalent to around 860,000 trees, was avoided, as was approximately 42,000 kg of NOx and 1,200 kg of PMx .
To highlight the profuse commitment for the sustainability of mobility through electrication of the vehicle eet, Enel X has updated the e-mobility Emission Saving tool, the algorithm capable of calculating the quantity of CO2 saved in the use of an electric or electried vehicle, compared to one powered by a traditional endothermic engine, adding also the calculation of nitrogen oxide (NOx ) and paiculate ma©er (PMx ) avoided. The e-mobility Emission Saving tool is the rst algorithm validated by an internationally recognized ceifying body (RINA) for this purpose according to principles recognized in regulation UNI EN ISO 14064- 2:2019. The need to broaden the algorithm's calculation perimeter emerged following collaboration with the pharmaceutical company Novais, which with Enel X has presented a new study on the relationship between pollution and its impact on the health of people.
January 2018 to December 2020 saw over 1.6 million recharges at Enel X stations across Italy; approximately 21 million kWh was delivered by the charging stations and about 130 million km were traveled by electric vehicle owners. The kWh distributed from the recharging stations is calculated by the EMM system (Electro Mobility Management Platform), the Enel X digital platform that continuously manages information related to the recharging of electric vehicles across Italy, accessible to both public and private paies. The data is transmi©ed from the fast (JuicePump) and quick (JuicePole and Pole Station) infrastructures equipped with an internal measuring device and from the connected JuiceBoxes installed at home.
The calculation of CO2 saved and of the other main pollutants linked to mobility (PMx and NOx ) is a combination of the data on the distance traveled by 100% electric-powered vehicles (BEV) or plug-in hybrids (PHEV) only using electric-

(1) 2019 Renement to the 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories.

In order to protect the landscape and the local area, Global Infrastructure and Networks has adopted specic strategies to mitigate the environmental impacts of construction activities relating to new grids in addition to upgrades to existing ones.
The cabling ratio is the relationship (in percentage terms) between the length of the cable lines and the total length of the lines, showing immediately the mitigation of the environmental impacts of the electric lines. The increase in this index over time is due to an increase in the length of overhead and underground cable lines, reducing the quota of bare conductors, with benets in terms of the resilience of the grid, cuailing plant-cu©ing activities and a drastic reduction in the risk of electrocution for birdlife. In 2020, the cabling ratio showed an increase of three decimal points compared to the previous year, a©esting itself at 60.4%, thanks also to the notewohy contribution from the South American companies.
As regards the reduction of grid losses, on the other hand, this is guaranteed through interventions which also contribute towards the reduction of CO2 emissions. These actions focus on infrastructures, and aim, for example, at the progressive reduction of single-phase electric lines as well as the construction of new electric lines to lighten the load on the pre-existing ones in addition to the use of lowloss transformers. Other actions include boosting the grid by using conductors with a greater cross-section and rephasing primary transformer. Finally, the realization of new transformer cabins will help reduce the length of the low -voltage lines which are characterized by higher levels of loss. More broadly, optimizing the grid set-up will allow a signicant reduction of its losses.
Fuhermore, in 2020 the Global Infrastructure and Networks division launched an ambitious environment improvement program, implemented in each country where we are present and which, beginning from an analysis of the most signicant aspects on both a global scale and in the context of each country, aims to identify concrete action plans for the purpose of improving environmental pe¥ormances and increasing environmental sustainability.
At December 31, 2020, the number of legal proceedings pending was 255 across the whole Group. The main environmental disputes related to Italy, Latin America and Iberia.
The total amount of nes issued to Group Companies in 2020 was about 85 million euros. The sum is due to nes received in Spain, mainly related to the distribution activities of Edistribución Redes Digitales and secondarily to those of Endesa Generación, and in Brazil for production related activities.

102-15

| Activities | 2020-2022 targets | 2020 results | Status | 2021-2023 targets | Tag | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Priorities | Plan | SDG PEACE, JUSTICE AND STRONG INSTITUTIONS |
Code | Engagement - Adoption of an engagement policy with the generality of shareholders (and with a special focus on institutional investors) in line with the amendments of the new Corporate Governance |
Started the process of defining the Enel SpA engagement policy ("Policy for the man agement of the dia logue with institutional investors and with the generality of share holders and bondhold ers of Enel SpA") |
ON-PLAN | Adoption of the Enel SpA engagement policy and support for the Investor Relations unit in engagement activities with institutional investors and proxy advisors on corporate governance issues |
||||
| Economic and …nancial F value creation Sound governance and E fair corporate conduct |
Sound governance Target |
Anti-bribery certification - ISO 37001 | anti-bribery management system certification secured for the main Italian companies and extension to cover the Group's foreign companies |
Certification car ried out on the main Group companies, while maintaining the certifications previ |
ON-PLAN | ISO 37001 anti-bribery management system certification secured for the main Italian companies and extension to cover the |
|||||
| Activities 2020-2022 targets |
2020 results | Status | 2021-2023 targets | Tag | SDG | ously acquired by the companies that have started the certification process as of 2017 |
Group's foreign companies | ||||
| Diversity Policy - Monitoring of the implementation of the Diversity Policy in the Board of Directors |
Ensured full compliance with the Policy |
ON-PLAN | Monitoring of the implementation of the Diversity Policy in the Board of Directors |
criminal risks | Compliance Program - Ongoing improvement of Compliance Programs/Models for the prevention of |
• Process continued to adopt the Enel Global Compliance Program regarding the acquisition and |
ON-PLAN | Ongoing improvement of Compliance Programs/ Models for the prevention of criminal risks |
|||
| Recommendations and best practices - Continuous alignment with international recommendations and best practices for governance |
• Ensured alignment with international recommendations and best practices for governance, including those recommended by leading proxy advisors • Sta…ed the process |
ON-PLAN | Continuous alignment with international recommendations and best practices for governance |
set-up of companies at Group level • Ongoing updates to the Models for the prevention of criminal risks of foreign companies |
|||||||
| of implementing the new Corporate Governance Code for Listed Companies1 |
231 and Enel Global Compliance Program | Training - Additional extension of training on Model | Online training on eth ical issues (e.g. Model 231, Anti-Corruption Management System, EGCP) was extended |
ON-PLAN | Further extension of training on Model 231 and the Enel Global Compliance Program |
||||||
| Induction plan - Structured plan of induction of Directors and Statutory Auditors during the mandate |
Extensive and structured induction program for Directors and Statutory Auditors in order to gain in depth understanding |
ON-PLAN | Structured plan of induction of Directors and Statutory Auditors during the mandate |
to all employees of the Group's Italian and foreign companies, including induction activities in vi…ual classrooms |
|||||||
| of the sectors in which the Group operates, company dynamics, as well as market trends and the regulatory framework |
Human rights due diligence countries of presence |
• Implementation of the new phase of due diligence on the human rights management system • Due diligence conducted on strategic assets in the |
• Due diligence completed on the management system • Launched the development of a standard method for |
ON-PLAN | • In 2021: application of the site due diligence methodology to the pilot assets identied during the 2020 analysis • In 2022: extension of the |
||||||
| Board review - Execution of the board review with the support of an independent consultant |
Board review carried out with the support of an independent consultant using the "peer-to-peer review" method |
ON-PLAN | Execution of the board review with the support of an independent consultant |
conducting human rights due diligence at individual asset level (currently being completed) |
application of the site due diligence methodology; review of the due diligence on the human rights management system to enable the use of the new IT platform during the process |
||||||
| Goals New |
• In 2023: completion of the review of the due diligence on the human rights management system |
| ON-PLAN | Adoption of the Enel SpA engagement policy and support for the Investor Relations unit in engagement activities with institutional investors and proxy advisors on corporate governance issues |
|
|---|---|---|
| ON-PLAN | ISO 37001 anti-bribery management system certification secured for the main Italian companies and extension to cover the Group's foreign companies |
|
| ON-PLAN | Ongoing improvement of Compliance Programs/ Models for the prevention of criminal risks |
|
| ON-PLAN | Further extension of training on Model 231 and the Enel Global Compliance Program |
|
| ON-PLAN | • In 2021: application of the site due diligence methodology to the pilot assets identied during the 2020 analysis • In 2022: extension of the application of the site due diligence methodology; review of the due diligence on the human rights management system to enable the use of the new IT platform during the process • In 2023: completion of the review of the due diligence on the human rights management system |
Enel is a company listed on the Mercato Telematico Azionario organized and managed by Borsa Italiana SpA since 1999 and has the highest number of shareholders among Italian companies. Notably, the shareholder structure at December 2020 is as follows: 62.3% institutional investors, 14.1% retail investors, 23.6% Ministry of the Economy and Finance. Enel's corporate structure includes the main international investment funds, insurance companies, pension funds and ethical funds, thanks also to the adoption, by the Company and the Group, of the best international practices on transparency and corporate governance. Moreover, at the date of this Sustainability Repo, the Enel Group includes other 14 companies issuing shares listed on the Argentinian, Brazilian, Chilean, Peruvian, Russian, Spanish, and US Stock Exchanges.
102-18 102-19 102-20 102-22 102-23 102-24 102-26 102-32
During 2020, Enel's corporate governance system proved to be in compliance with the principles set down in the 2018 edition of the Corporate Governance Code of listed companies1 , adopted by the Company, and with international best practices. The Company's process of adopting the new Italian Corporate Governance Code, published on January 31, 2020, was completed in March 2021. The corporate governance system adopted by Enel and the Group is oriented towards the goal of sustainable success, given that it is aimed at creating value for shareholders over the long term, taking into account the social impoance of the Group's business operations and the consequent need, in conducting such operations, to adequately consider all the interests involved.
For a detailed illustration of Enel's corporate governance we invite you to refer to the Repo on Corporate Governance and Ownership Structure for 2020, which is available on the Company's website (www.enel.com); we fuher refer you to the specic sections of this Sustainability Repo for an illustration of the governance of sustainability and the management of climate change.
Legal and Corporate Aairs

Giulio Fazio
Ecient governance allows an informed identi cation of the strategic objectives and of the nature and level of risk associated with them, thus facilitating ecient and, at the same time, prudent management.
Since the listing of its shares on the Stock Exchange, Enel has deemed it appropriate to set up corporate structures dedicated to dialogue with institutional investors and with the broader category of shareholders. We therefore set up the following within boundary of the Company: (i) the Investor Relations unit, currently in the Administration, Finance and Control Function; (ii) an area in the Corporate Aairs Unit, which is in turn pa of the Legal and Corporate Aairs Function. In this context, Enel maintains dialogue with investors based on principles of fairness and transparency, in compliance with EU and national regulations on market abuse, as well as in line with international best practices. Among other ma©ers, the Investor Relations unit drafts Enel's equity story and organizes meetings between the Company's top management, institutional investors, and nancial analysts. It also oversees the documentation to be submi©ed to the la©er when disclosing periodic nancial data to the market and in updating the Group's Strategic Plan in the context of Capital Markets Day. This is accompanied by ordinary activities, which include group or one-on-one meetings, conference calls, and interaction with nancial analysts, with the aim of suppoing them in their analysis and ultimately facilitating the correct assessment of the Company by the nancial community. With the suppo of the Innovability® Function, the Investor Relations unit also discusses environmental, social and governance ("ESG") issues with investors, topics which can have major nancial repercussions in the medium and long term. In view of the health emergency connected with the Covid-19 pandemic, staing in March 2020 dialogue with the nancial community has been conducted solely in viual mode. During the initial months of 2021, a policy was adopted to manage communications with institutional investors and with Enel's other shareholders and bondholders. For more details, refer to the Repo on Corporate Governance and Ownership Structure. Also, Enel's website (www. enel.com, "Investors" section) provides access to economic, nancial, environmental, social and governance information and updated data and documents of paicular interest, providing a multidisciplinary and integrated vision.

44
% 102-5 102-18 102-21 102-22 102-26 102-27 102-43
Governance intends to satisfy the interests of all relevant stakeholders who can put their trust in us, aware of the principles of transparency, correctness and integrity that guide our actions.
The solidity of our governance is a crucial element in the pursuit of a sustainable success that can create value in the long term.
WOMEN
on Enel SpA's Board of Directors
151
the Code of Ethics of which 26 violations

on human rights topics, through a dedicated online course
(1) Current edition available on the Borsa Italiana website at h©ps://www.borsaitaliana.it/comitato-corporate-governance/codice/codiceeng2018.en.pdf).
Board of Directors
102-15 102-18 102-19 102-20 102-22 102-23 102-24 102-26 102-27 102-32 102-33 103-2 103-3 102-28 405-1
The Board of Directors in oce was appointed by the Ordinary Shareholders' Meeting of May 14, 2020 and consists of nine members.
Enel applies diversity criteria, also in relation to gender, in the composition of the Board of Directors, in line with the priority goal of ensuring adequate competence and professionalism of its members. Specically, In January 2018 the Board of Directors approved a diversity policy, which describes the optimal characteristics of the Board's composition to ensure it can full its duties as eectively as possible, making decisions that can tangibly benet from the contribution of a plurality of qualied point of views able to examine the issues under discussion from diverse perspectives.
The Board of Directors held 16 meetings in 2020, of which 12 addressed climate-related ma¡ers, reÄected in the strategies and related implementation methods. Moreover, a broad ranging and aiculated induction program was de ned in 2020, with 17 initiatives aimed at providing the Directors with adequate knowledge of the Group's business sectors, as well as its corporate dynamics and their evolution, market trends, and the legal framework; also the Statutory Auditors paicipated in this program. The induction initiatives carried out in 2020 concerned all Business Lines and the main Countries and Regions in which the Group is present, and also the Global Service Functions ("Digital Solutions" and "Procurement") and the principal sta Functions ("Administration, Finance and Control", "Communications", "Innovability®" and "People and Organization"), plus a session on "Digital Transformation", conducted with the paicipation of an external expe. In this context, one of the induction activities also concerned the Enel Group's 2021-2023 Sustainability Plan and the positioning of the Group companies in the main sustainability indexes. In February 2020, the Board of Directors updated the specic corporate policy on the maximum number of o¢ces Enel Directors may hold in administrative and/or control bodies of other companies of signicant size, so as to adapt its contents to reect the relevant best practices developed by the main proxy advisors and by signicant institutional investors. In February and March 2021 the Board of Directors also adopted several measures aimed to ensure the implementation in Enel of the new Italian Corporate Governance Code, published on January 31, 2020. The measures in question include the adoption of a policy for the management of the dialogue with institutional investors and with the generality of shareholders and bondholders

of Enel ("engagement policy"), that takes into account the best practices adopted in this area by institutional investors and reected in Stewardship codes. In relation to the topic of succession plans for executive directors, in September 2016 the Board of Directors shared the contents of a specic "contingency plan" aimed at regulating the actions to be taken to ensure proper management of the Company in case of early cessation of the Chief Executive Ocer before the expiry of the ordinary term of oce (de ned as "crisis management" case).
| 1 2 At a Glance |
3 Our ESG peormance Trend Topic |
4 Appendix |
||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Board of Directors | ||||||
| CHAIRMAN | CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER | SECRETARY | ||||
| Michele Crisostomo | AND GENERAL MANAGER Francesco Starace |
Silvia Alessandra Fappani | ||||
| DIRECTORS | ||||||
| Cesare Calari | Mariana Mazzucato | |||||
| Costanza Esclapon de Villeneuve | Mirella Pellegrini | |||||
| Samuel Leupold | Anna Chiara Svelto | |||||
| 2020 GENDER |
1 8 DIRECTOR DIRECTORS 1 in 2019 8 in 2019 |
7 in 2019 | ||||
| 55.6% | 44.4% | |||||
| 66.7% in 2019 | 5 MEN 6 in 2019 |
4 33.3% in 2019 WOMEN 3 in 2019 |
||||
| 2020 AGE |
||||||
| <30 | ||||||
| 30-50 | >50 | |||||
| 0% 0% in 2019 |
22% 0% in 2019 |
78% 100% in 2019 |
||||
| 2020 | ||||||
| energy industry | strategic vision | accounting, nance and risk management |
||||
| 3 | 4 | 5 | ||||
| 1 | 9 1 |
9 1 |
||||
| EXPERTISE legal and corporate governance 3 |
communication and marketing 1 |
international experience 6 |
Finally, in the closing months of 2020 and during the initial months of 2021, with the assistance of the independent consultant Spenser Stua the Board of Directors carried out an assessment of the size, composition, and functioning of the Board itself and its commi©ees ("board review"), in line with the most advanced corporate governance practices followed internationally and adopted under the Corporate Governance Code. The board review, which was extended also to include the Board of Statutory Auditors, was conducted in accordance with the peer-to-peer review method, i.e. through assessment not merely of the functioning of each body considered as a whole, but also of the style and contents of the contribution supplied by each director and statutory auditor. In the context of the board review of the Board of Directors, the questionnaires and interviews also concerned inter alia the implementation of the principles of sustainability in the strategies and business model of the Company and the Group, together with the a©ention devoted to sustainability topics by the Board of Directors.
102-28 102-35 102-36 102-37
The Enel remuneration policy for 2020, adopted by the Board of Directors and approved by the Shareholders' Meeting of May 14, 2020, was dened taking account of national and international best practices, the indications that emerged from the favorable vote of the Shareholders' Meeting of May 16, 2019 concerning the remuneration policy for 2019, and the results of a benchmark analysis concerning the remuneration treatment of the Chair of the Board of Directors, the Chief Executive Ocer/General Manager and the non-executive Directors of Enel for the 2017/2019 mandate, prepared by the independent consultant Willis Towers Watson.
In line with the recommendations of the Corporate Governance Code for listed companies (2018 edition), the 2020 remuneration policy is designed to a©ract, motivate and retain talent with the most suitable professional qual-
(1) The gures for 2020 and 2019 refer to directors qualifying as independent pursuant to the Corporate Governance Code (2018 edition).
CHAIRMAN
Barbara Tadolini Romina Guglielmei Claudio Sooriva
Maurizio De Filippo Francesca Di Donato Piera Vitali
KPMG SpA
ities to manage the Company successfully, incentivize the achievement of strategic goals and sustainable growth of the Company, and to align management interests to the priority goal of creating sustainable value for shareholders in the medium/long term and promoting the corporate mission and values.
The remuneration policy for 2020 sets out the following compensation for the Chief Executive Ocer/General Manager and for executives with strategic responsibilities ("ESRs"):
a xed component;
a sho-term variable component ("MBO"), to be paid based on the achievement of specic pe¥ormance objectives. In paicular:
a long-term variable component linked to paicipation in specic multi-annual incentive plans. In paicular, for 2020 this component is linked to paicipation in the
Long-Term Incentive Plan reserved to the management of Enel SpA and/or of its subsidiaries pursuant to aicle 2359 of the Italian Civil Code ("2020 LTI Plan"), which contains the following three-year pe¥ormance goals:
The 2020 LTI Plan also envisages any premium accrued to be represented by a share component, to which – based on the level of achievement of the various objectives – a monetary component can be added. In paicular, 100% of the base amount of the Chief Executive Ocer/General Manager and 50% of the base amount of the ESRs will be paid in Enel shares, previously acquired by the Company. In addition, the disbursement of a signicant poion of the long-term variable remuneration component (70% of the total) is deferred to the second nancial year after the three-year pe¥ormance period of the 2020 LTI Plan (i.e. deferred payment).
For more information on the contents of the 2020 remuneration policy, refer to Enel's Repo on the remuneration policy for 2020 and compensations paid in 2019, available on the Company website (www.enel.com).
102-11 102-15 102-25 102-28 102-29 102-30 103-2 103-3 201-2
In consideration of its operations, Enel adopts a classi cation of the risks to which it is exposed, composed of six categories: strategic, nancial, operative, governance & culture, digital technology, and compliance.
The risks are dened in a catalogue to be referred to in all Group areas and for all the structures involved in management and monitoring processes. Adoption of a common language facilitates mapping and organic representation of risks within the Group, thus aiding identication of risks




Enel adopts a governance model in line with best risk management practices, which involves:
that aect Group processes and of the roles of the organizational units involved in their management.
The Group also adopts a Risk Appetite Framework, in order to enable, for each risk and in accordance with an integrated approach, the appropriate management and control measures, plus development and updating (metrics and models for measurement of risks). For the eective management of such risks, Enel set up an Internal Control and Risk Management System ("SCIGR"), updated period-
| 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|
| Pay ratio – Ratio between total remuneration | 146x | 143x |
| of the Enel CEO/GM and average gross annual | (35x xed compensation) | (36x xed compensation) |
| remuneration of Group employees |
For the sake of full disclosure, the same ratio is shown also
ratio calculation methods, see Enel's Repo on the remuneration policy for 2021 and compensations paid in 2020, available on the Company website (www.enel.com).
Finally, we draw your a©ention to the fact that the table below gives both for 2019 and 2020 the ratio between the total remuneration accrued by Enel's Chief Executive Ocer/ General Manager and average gross annual remuneration of the Group's employees ("pay ratio").
ically, that strengthens risk prole awareness, picking up
the related oppounities, and suppos management in
decision-making processes aimed at value creation in a
constantly evolving external context. The system is com-
posed of the set of rules, procedures, and organizational
structures designed to allow identication, measurement,
management, and monitoring of the main corporate risks
within the Group. In this context, the Board of Directors per-
forms a policy making and coordination role for risk man-
agement, which assures the adoption of aware, structured
decisions that are consistent with the nature and level of
risk at all levels of the Group. More details are provided
in the Repo on Corporate Governance, available on the
Company website (www.enel.com, "Investors" section).
Due to the nature of its business and its geographical dis-
tribution, the Group is exposed to dierent types of ESG
risk (environmental, social, and governance), identied
within the reference framework of risk categories adopted
by Enel.
In the identication of potential ESG risks the following were considered:
results of the materiality analysis (see the section "At a Glance" - "Denition of priorities" and the Methodological note in this document);

the risk assessments carried out as pa of Enel's due diligence process on human rights, which involved numerous expes from dierent sectors, including civil society, academic institutions, local communities, customers and suppliers, in the various countries in which the Group operates;
the analysis of some of the most highly internationally accredited ESG rating agencies, which use specic risk assessment systems to rate the level of company pe¥ormance in relation to sustainability.
In the risk identication and assessment stage, the "Precautionary Principle"2 was applied, paicularly in relation to risks relating to the environment, health, and safety. For each type of risk, specic actions have been identied to mitigate eects and ensure correct management. Enel also applies this principle to risk management, especially with regard to the development and introduction of new products/technologies, planning of operating assets and the development and construction of new plants/assets.
The following is a description of the main ESG risk types, the actions intended to mitigate the eects and assure their correct management.
(2) Rio Declaration on the Environment and Development (Rio de Janeiro, June 3-14, 1992), Principle 15.

|
|||||

|||||||||||||||||||||
|||||| || ||
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
||||||||||||||||||||| The markets and the businesses where the Group operates are subject to a gradual and increasing competition and evolution, both from a technological and regulatory standpoint, with dierent timing from Country to Country. As a result, the Group faces an increasing competitive pressure. Fuhermore, the Group operates in regulated markets or regimes. Thus, changes in the rules of functioning of those markets and regimes, as well as their provisions and obligations, along with uctuations in macroeconomic variables, can inuence the management's evolution and the Group's results.
The business risks stemming from the Group's natural presence in competitive markets are faced with a strategy of integration through the value chain, with a greater drive for technological innovation, diversication and geographical expansion. Specically, the actions enacted have produced the evolution of the customer pofolio on the free market, in a downstream integration logic on the nal markets, the optimization of the productive mix, by improving the competitiveness of the plants on the basis of a cost leadership, as well as the search for new markets with a high growth potential and the development of renewable sources through adequate investment plans in dierent Countries.
In view of the risks deriving from regulatory factors, the Company has intensied the relations with local government and regulatory bodies, by adopting a transparent, collaborative and proactive approach to face and remove the sources of instability in the regulatory framework.
Physical risks arising from climate change can be classied as acute (i.e. extreme events) and chronic: the former are linked to extremely intense weather-climatic conditions, while the la©er refers to
gradual but structural changes in climatic conditions. electricity demand.
Extreme events may expose the Group to a potential unavailability of assets and infrastructures, restoration costs, and inconvenience for customers, etc. Chronic changes in climatic conditions, on the other hand, may expose the Group to other physical risks or oppounities (depending on the geographical location): for example, structural rainfall or wind changes could impact the Group's business in terms of generation, while structural temperature changes could have an impact on
With regard to the energy transition process moving towards a more sustainable model with a progressive electrication and reduction in CO2 emissions, in line with the Group's decarbonization strategy, there are risks, but above all oppounities, tied to both, the changing regulatory context and the technological and electrication trends, and resulting market developments, with potential eects also on commodities and energy prices. Fuher information is given in the "Net-Zero Ambition" chapter.
The Group is commi©ed to making continuous improvements to the environmental impact of its activities. It has constantly improved its emissions reduction targets, ceifying a new target with the SBTi in 2020 for 82 g/kWh of CO2 by 2030, heading for "zero emission generation" by 2050. The Group's strategic actions make it possible to mitigate the potential risks and grasp the oppounities provided by transition variables. The use of capital is indeed focused on decarbonisation, through the development of generation assets from renewable sources, on enabling infrastructures linked to the development of networks and on the implementation of platform models, taking advantage of technological and digital evolution, which will favour consumption's electrication, as well as the development of new services for end customers. Overall, the Group
MACROECONOMIC AND GEOPOLITICAL TRENDS, LEGISLATIVE AND REGULATORY EVOLUTION, AND THE COMPETITIVE SCENARIO
CLIMATE CHANGE

MITIGATION ACTIONS AND RELATED STRATEGIC OBJECTIVES
Enel has made the eective prevention and minimization of environmental impacts and risks a foundational element of each project across its entire life cycle. The adoption of ISO 14001-ceied environmental management systems ceied within the Group ensures the implementation of structured policies and procedures to identify and manage the environmental risks and oppounities associated with all corporate activities. A structured control plan combined with actions and improvement objectives inspired by the best environmental practices, with requirements higher than those linked to simple environmental regulatory compliance, mitigates the risk of impacts on the environmental matrix, reputational damage and legal disputes.
Also contributing are the multitude of actions to achieve the challenging environmental improvement objectives set by Enel, such as, for example, those regarding atmospheric emissions, waste production and water consumption, especially in areas with high water stress. The risk of water scarcity is directly mitigated by Enel's development strategy, which is based on the growth of generation from renewable sources that are essentially not dependent on the availability of water for their operation. Special a©ention is also devoted to assets in areas with a high level of water stress, in order to develop technological solutions to reduce consumption. Ongoing collaboration with local river basin management authorities enables us to adopt the most eective shared strategies for the sustainable management of hydroelectric generation assets. Lastly, appropriate terrestrial, marine and river monitoring of ecosystems is carried out to verify the eectiveness of measures adopted in order to protect, restore and preserve biodiversity. Fuher information is given in the "Environmental Sustainability"chapter.
The main health and safety risks to which Enel personnel and contractors are exposed are associated with operations at the Group's sites and assets. The violation of the laws, regulations and procedures governing health and safety, work environments, management of corporate structures, assets and processes, which could have an adverse impact on the health of employees, workers or stakeholders, can give rise to the risk of incurring administrative or judicial penalties and related economic, financial and reputational impacts. These risks were identified through an analysis of the main events that have occurred in the last three years. In particular, in terms of probability of occurrence, mechanical incidents (falls, collisions, crushing and cuts) are the most common, while the most severe in terms of potential associated impact are electrical incidents (fatalities). In addition, in relation to the presence of the Group in different areas of the world, employees and contractors could be exposed to health risks connected with potential emerging infectious diseases of a pandemic and potentially pandemic nature, which could have an impact on googd health and well-being.
Enel has adopted a Declaration of Commitment to Health and Safety, signed by the Group's top
management.
In implementing the policy, each Group Business Line has its own Occupational Health and Safety Management System compliant with the international standard BS OHSAS 18001, which is based on the identication of hazards, the qualitative and quantitative assessment of risks, the planning and implementation of prevention and protection measures, the verication of the eectiveness of the prevention and protection measures and any corrective actions. This system also considers the rigor employed in the selection and management of contractors and suppliers and the promotion of their involvement in programs for continuous improvement of safety pe¥ormance. The Enel Group has dened a structured health management system, based on prevention and protection measures, which also plays a role in the development of a corporate culture aimed at promoting the psycho-physical health and organizational well-being of workers, as well as helping to balance personal and professional life. Fuhermore, with regard to emergencies relating to health, safety and the environment, a unit
is dedicating more than 90% of the total investments planned for the 2021-2023 timeframe to the ght against climate change. Enel paicipates in the entire electricity value chain and has a diversied pofolio of activities, both in terms of generation technologies and the geographical areas and markets where it operates, mitigating climate change risks and their economic and nancial impacts.
The management of weather and climate phenomena adopts the best strategies for prevention, protection and boosting resilience, while also carrying out weather forecasting activities. Moreover, best practices are implemented on physical events to ensure a prompt recovery of operating conditions in the event of adverse events. In terms of insurance risk assessment activities, the Group manages loss prevention global programmes for propey and liability risks, aimed at covering losses relating to damages to assets, business interruptions and damages to third paies; such activities also include the assessment of the main exposures linked to natural events. All areas of the Group are subject to the ISO 14001 ceication and, by applying internationally recognised Environmental Management Systems (EMSs), potential sources of risk are monitored so that any critical issue may be promptly identied. The Group develops sho-, medium- and long-term scenarios in the energy and the nancial macroeconomic sectors in order to suppo its strategic and industrial planning, investment valuation, scenario planning and extraordinary transactions. By gradually integrating climate and transition scenarios, combined with the development of energy system models at country level, it is possible to intercept the eects on variables such as electricity demand, the system energy mix and the electrication of consumption. These activities make it possible to identify and assess related risks and oppounities. Fuher information is given in the "Net-Zero Ambition" chapter.
Over the last years, there has been a growing public awareness of the risks connected with development models that generate impacts on environmental quality and on ecosystems through the exploitation of scarce natural resources (including raw materials and water). |||||||||
In response to these needs, governments have imposed increasingly restrictive environmental regulations, placing ever more stringent constraints on the development of new industrial initiatives and, in the most impactful industries, incentivizing or requiring the elimination of technologies no longer considered sustainable.
In some cases, the synergistic eects between these impacts – such as global warming and the growing exploitation and degradation of water resources – increase the risk of environmental emergencies arising in the most sensitive areas of the planet, with the risk of various water resource uses having to compete, such as industrial, agricultural and civil uses. |||||||||
In this context, companies in every sector, and above all industry leaders, are ever more aware that environmental risks are increasingly economic risks. As a result, they are called upon to increase their commitment and accountability for developing and adopting innovative and sustainable technical solutions and development models.
||| ||||||||||| || |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
| || |||||| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ENVIRONMENT
ENVIRONMENT

The actions taken to counter the impacts of the Covid-19 emergency were centered around differentiation of procurement sources to prevent interruptions in the supply chain and in remote management of activities that would normally require physical interaction between Enel and the supplier (e.g. company on-site inspections).
Enel may be exposed to the risk of judicial or administrative sanctions, economic or nancial losses, and reputational damage as a result of paial or total interruption of commercial operations and of electricity supplies to customers, caused by technical faults, malfunctions of assets and plants, human error, sabotage, unavailability of raw materials or adverse weather events, or infectious diseases with epidemic or pandemic potential that may limit the normal functioning of the Group's activities or of its supply chain.
Enel has systems and mechanisms to guarantee a continuous and safe energy supply to the national electrical systems of the countries in which it operates. The Company is therefore constantly at work to develop and improve the eciency of the transpo and distribution network, in coordination with the other entities operating on the network infrastructure in various capacities. Enel carries out actions of network development, modernization, and maintenance on the infrastructure existing in all Countries, with the primary aim of improving the quality of the service delivered and reducing the number and duration of outages. Enel also constantly takes operational eciency and safety measures to guarantee correct functioning and availability of all its power plants. Lastly, the Group's assets are covered by adequate insurance mechanisms to protect the Company from potential negative economic consequences resulting from future and unceain events.
Moreover, with special reference to the management of critical events, Enel has drawn up Group, Business Line and Country policies to ensure eectiveness of the decision-making process in the management of any event that could impair continuity of the public service and the Company's business, including health emergencies with a local and/or global impact. Enel implements adequate protocols, plans and actions to ensure the smooth running of its business activity worldwide or, if necessary, its rapid recovery in the event of service interruptions. Especially in relation to the health emergency, Enel denes specic protocols designed to limit the spread of contagion among the people involved in operating assets and consequently guarantee the continuity of service. Fuher information on risk management is given in the "Infrastructure, ecosystems and platforms" chapter.
The profound transformations of the energy sector, which has experienced sweeping technological developments, require the presence of new professional proles and skills, as well as an impoant cultural and organizational change. Organizations must move to adopt new agile and exible business models. Policies to enhance diversity and to manage and promote talent have become key factors for companies that are managing the transition and have a widespread geographical presence.
Enel places the people who work for it at the center of its business model: the management of human capital is a priority for which specic objectives have been established. The main goals include: the development of the digital capabilities and skills made necessary by the Fouh Industrial Revolution, as well as the promotion of reskilling and upskilling programs for employees in order to suppo the energy transition; the eective involvement of employees in the pursuit of the corporate purpose, which ensures the achievement of be©er results while oering greater satisfaction to our people; the development of systems for evaluating the working environment and pe¥ormance; the dissemination of diversity and inclusion policies to all countries in which the Group operates, as well as instilling an inclusive organizational culture based on the principles of non-discrimination
has been set up within the HSEQ depament of the Parent with liaisons in each Business Line and Country in order to ensure the denition of the global strategy and policies for emergency management and their adoption in every Group organization. In paicular, this organizational structure and the related management processes make it possible to direct, integrate and monitor, both at Group level and in the individual countries in which it operates, all the prevention, protection and intervention actions aimed at protecting the health of employees and contractors, also in relation to exogenous health risk factors that may not be strictly related to work activities.
Fuher information on risk management is given in the "Occupational health and safety" chapter.
Enel may be exposed to the risk of reputational, economic, or nancial losses fuher to ineffective procurement activities or contracts management, inadequate supplier qualication processes, excessive recourse to direct awards, deciencies in scouting activities, insucient monitoring of compliance with contractual obligations, and failure to apply.
Group procurement processes and the related governance documents constitute a structured system of standards and checkpoints that make it possible to combine the achievement of economic business goals with full compliance with the fundamental principles set down in the Code of Ethics, in the Enel Global Compliance Program, in the Zero Tolerance Plan, and in the Policy on Human Rights, while continuing to promote initiatives aimed at sustainable economic development.
The procedures that govern procurement processes are all aimed at guaranteeing behaviors oriented towards the utmost respect the key values of loyalty, professionalism, collaboration, transparency, and traceability of decisional processes.
These principles are expressed in the processes and organizational measures that Enel has decided to adopt in a self-regulation regime in order to establish relationships of trust with all its stakeholders and to define stable and constructive relations that are not limited to guaranteeing economic competitiveness but that take account of the best practices in essential areas for the Group, i.e. opposition to child labor, promotion of occupational health and safety conditions, and environmental responsibility. In this sense, the Group adopts a procedural system for the routine operation of the various Procurement units that, adopting the practice
of tenders almost by default, guarantee the maximum competition and equal opportunity of access to all operators having the necessary technical, economic-financial, environmental, safety, human rights, legal and ethical characteristics.
The supplier qualification system is the same across the entire Enel Group, and it monitors verification of the aforementioned requirements. In fact, through the qualification system – even before the procurement process starts – Enel checks that potential suppliers are in line with its strategic vision and expectations in relation to all the mentioned profiles and that they hold the same values. The global supplier qualification system allows accurate assessment of companies that intend to participate in the procurement procedures and represents a guarantee for Enel, because it constitutes an updated list of entities of proven reliability from which to draw, and the possibility, in compliance with the relevant rules in force, for suppliers to be engaged by means of the procurement tenders called by the Group companies. The Supplier Perfomance Management process, which completes the qualification procedure, is designed to monitor performance in relation to the integrity of conduct in tender procedures, quality, punctuality, and sustainability in execution of the contract. Procurement by direct award and without a competitive procedure can occur only in exceptional suitably motivated circumstances in compliance with the relevant statutory legislation.
Supply chain risk management effectiveness is constantly monitored in order to guide procurement strategies.
HEALTH AND SAFETY

PROCUREMENT, LOGISTICS, AND SUPPLY CHAIN
BUSINESS INTERRUPTION
PEOPLE AND ORGANIZATION
PROCUREMENT, LOGISTICS, AND SUPPLY CHAIN 1 2 3 4 At a Glance Our ESG peormance Trend Topic Appendix
(including public commitments and awareness raising in construction) and at local level, such as the Futur-e program rolled out in Italy and Spain to nd sustainable solutions (focused mainly on employment and the development of economic activities) for the areas aected by the abandonment of coal red plants.
By means of dialogue with shareholders and bondholders, the Investor Relations unit collects feedback on how to integrate and improve the Group's repoing process and make its communica-
Moreover, since 2019 a proactive engagement activity with the main Enel shareholders has been
tions as eective as possible. organized on environmental, social, and governance issues. vernance" chapters.
Fuher information is given in the "At a Glance", "Communities and shared values" and "Sound go-
The speed of technological developments that constantly generate new challenges, the ever increasing frequency and intensity of cyber a©acks and the a©raction of critical infrastructures and strategic industrial sectors as targets underscore the potential risk that, in extreme cases, the normal operations of companies could grind to a halt. Cyber a©acks have evolved dramatically in recent years: their number has grown exponentially, as has their complexity and impact (theft of company and customer data), making it increasingly dicult to promptly identify the source of threats. This exposure reects the many environments in which the Group operates (data, industry and people), a circumstance that accompanies the intrinsic complexity and interconnection of the resources that over the years have been increasingly integrated into the Group's daily operating processes (see also the "Digital suppos and cyber security" chapter in this document).
The Group has adopted a holistic governance approach to cyber security that is applied to all the sectors of IT (Information Technology), OT (Operational Technology) and IoT (Internet of Things). The framework is based on the commitment of top management, on global strategic management, on the involvement of all business areas as well as on the units involved in the design and management of our systems. It seeks to use cu©ing edge technologies, to design ad hoc business processes, to strengthen people's IT awareness and to implement regulatory requirements for IT security. In addition, the Group has developed an IT risk management methodology founded on "risk-based" and "cyber security by design" approaches, making business risk analysis the fundamental step in all strategic decisions. Enel has also created its own Cyber Emergency Readiness Team (CERT) in order to proactively respond to any IT security incidents. Finally, since 2019, the Group also took out an insurance policy for cyber security risks in order to mitigate IT threats. (see also the "Digital suppos and cyber security" chapter in this document)
The Group is carrying out a complete digital transformation of how it manages the entire energy value chain, developing new business models and digitalising its business processes, integrating systems and adopting new technologies. A consequence of this digital transformation is that the Group is increasingly exposed to risks related to the functioning of the IT systems implemented throughout the Company with impacts on operational processes and activities, which could lead to the exposure of IT and OT (Operational Technology) systems to service interruptions or data losses.
and equal oppounity, a key driver in ensuring that everyone can make an eective contribution. In addition, Enel is developing specic initiatives to foster the diusion of agile working methods in business processes. The Group is commi©ed on enhancing the resilience and exibility of organisational models through simplication and digitalisation in order to enable the eectiveness and autonomy of people working in the company within new sma working arrangements, already eectively tested in response to the Covid-19 pandemic emergency, which will be a key element of future working models.
The risk of ineective engagement of key stakeholders in relation to the strategic positioning of Enel on sustainability and nancial objectives, due to the lack of understanding, anticipation, or orientation of their expectations, could cause incomplete integration of such expectations within the Company's business strategy and sustainability planning processes, with a potential negative impact on its reputation and competitiveness.
Enel currently operates in a vast geographical area, with a presence in more than 40 countries distributed in ve continents, conducting business activities that call for the development of infrastructure in local areas, which can provoke criticism or potential disputes with communities in some cases. Such conditions could lead to delays in the execution of projects for new sites and impacts on operational continuity, with a potential negative economic-nancial and reputational eect.
On the other hand, Enel's commitment to decarbonize its energy mix – with a paicular focus on the coal mining phase – could have a potential negative impact in local areas that are heavily dependent on coal operations (mining and electricity generation) in terms of job losses and socio-economic development. This could ultimately expose Enel to reputational risks or even delay the Group's achievement of the decarbonization goals set out in its Strategic Plan.
In the meantime, the outlook of investors is shifting fast: the changes in progress and challenges presented by the modern world are also revolutionizing the method of investing.
ESG investors are growing constantly: at December 31, 2020, SRI funds constituted approximately 14.6% of the share capital (vs 10.8% at December 31, 2019), while PRI (Principles for Responsible Investment) signatory investors represent 47.8% of the share capital (vs 43% at December 31, 2019).
Possible incorrect or incomplete disclosure by Enel of the results obtained, and likewise ineective communications to the nancial community of its strategy, which aims to create value for customers, society, and the environment, could have signicant negative impacts on the assessment of Enel's actions and obligations.
Since 2015 the Company has had a Creating Shared Value (CSV) model that integrates social and environmental factors in corporate processes and throughout the entire value chain, especially in relation to business development, engineering and construction operations, asset management and maintenance, and disposals. By means of this model, the Group makes a proactive commitment with local communities to identify their main needs, which are then integrated into structured action plans, the implementation of which is constantly monitored.
Moreover, Enel promotes inclusive energy transition by way of improvement actions both globally
$$\mathbf{0} \longrightarrow \underbrace{\mathbf{0} \longrightarrow \mathbf{0}}_{\underset{\theta \text{min}}} \oplus \underbrace{\mathbf{0}}_{\underset{\theta \text{min}}}$$

|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
PEOPLE AND ORGANIZATION

DIGITALIZATION, IT EFFECTIVENESS, AND SERVICE CONTINUITY
Enel may be exposed to the risk of judicial measures, administrative sanctions, economic or nancial losses and reputational damage as a result of:
illegal or illicit conduct, including active and passive acts of corruption, perpetrated by personnel inside or outside the Group in order to secure an unjust benet for themselves or for others; > infringement of international, national, or local laws and regulations concerning: accounting, nancial, or tax discipline, market disclosures, anti-trust and consumer rights issues or other applicable legislative provisions (e.g. rules concerning permi©ing or tenders, regulation of
Enel has adopted an Internal Control and Risk Management System expressed in company rules and procedures that all who work in Enel or on behalf of Enel are required to follow, by means of their respective contractual commitments. The Internal Control System also includes specic compliance programs, i.e.: the Code of Ethics, the Zero Tolerance for Corruption Plan ("ZTC Plan"), the Policy on Human Rights, the Enel Global Compliance Program ("EGCP"), the Model pursuant to Italian Legislative Decree 231/01 and other national compliance programs adopted by Group companies in accordance with their national legislation. Fuhermore, to fuher pursue its commitment to ghting corruption, Enel voluntarily decided to ceify its Anti-Bribery Management System (SGPC) in compliance with the requirements of international standard ISO 37001:2016 (international ceication of anti-bribery management systems). This ceication process has involved the Group's main foreign subsidiaries. External sta, working for Enel Group company suppliers, undeake to comply with the ethical clauses set out in their respective contracts, which incorporate references to Enel's commitment in terms of business integrity in the pursuit of its activities. The ongoing monitoring of legislative and regulatory developments at the local, national and international levels is guaranteed by the operations of specic company Functions with competence in relation to these ma©ers.
Fuher information on risk management is given in the "Sound governance" chapter.
These risks are managed using a series of measures developed by the Global Digital Solu-
In the era of digitalization and markets globalization, Enel's business strategy focused on accelerating the transformation process towards a business model based on a digital platform, through a data-driven approach focused on the customer, which is being implemented along the entire value chain.
tions unit (GDS), which is responsible for guiding the Group's digital transformation. It has set up an internal control system that introduces control points along the entire IT value chain, enabling us to prevent the emergence of risks relating to such issues as the creation of services that do not meet business needs, the failure to implement adequate security measures and service interruptions. The internal control system of the Global Digital Solutions unit oversees both the activities performed in-house and those outsourced to external associates and service providers. Furthermore, Enel is promoting the dissemination of a digital culture and digital skills within the Group in order to successfully guide the digital transformation and minimize the associated risks. ||||||||||| |||||||||||
The Company, which is present in more than 40 countries, has the largest customer base in the public utilities sector (around 70 million customers), with a current workforce of approximately 67 thousand people; consequently, the Group's new business model requires the management of an increasingly relevant and growing volume of personal data in order to achieve the nancial and business results envisaged in the 2021-2023 strategic plan. This naturally increases our exposure to the risks connected with the protection of personal data, also in view of the increasingly stringent privacy legislation in most of the countries where Enel operates. These risks may result in a loss of condentiality, integrity and availability of personal data of customers, employees and third paies (e.g. suppliers), causing penalties propoionate to the overall turnover, interdiction from processes and consequent economic or nancial losses, as well as reputational damages.
In order to manage and mitigate this risk, Enel has adopted a global model of personal data governance through the assignment of privacy roles at all levels – including the appointment of Data Protection Ocers ("DPOs") both at a global and country level – as well as digital compliance instruments to map applications and processes and manage relevant risks to personal data protection, in compliance with the peculiarities of local sector regulations.
||
|| |||||| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
PERSONAL DATA


PROTECTION
OTHER
COMPLIANCE RISKS
In relation to the specic contexts pursuant to Italian Legislative Decree 254/16 concerning climate change, human rights, and the ght against corruption, we invite you to refer to the sections dedicated to these topics in this Sustainability Repo.
The other types of risk to which the Enel Group is exposed are detailed in the "Risk Management" section of the Integrated Annual Repo available on the website (www.enel. com, "Investors" section).
Enel constantly manages relations with institutions (local, national, European, and international) in line with the Enel Compliance Program, providing complete and transparent information with the aim of placing institutional counterpas in the best possible position to make the decisions within the sphere of their competence. Enel also contributes to the consultation processes regarding political and legislative dossiers on energy and environmental issues. In the context of relations with European institutions, Enel actively contributes to every phase of the consultation process on political and legislative dossiers of corporate interest through careful monitoring and analysis (see also the chapter "Net zero-ambition").
The Enel Group has been enrolled in the EU voluntary transparency register since its creation in 2008. The register aims to provide citizens with a single and direct access point to information on who carries out activities aimed at inuencing the EU decision-making process, the interests pursued, and the resources invested in these activities (h©p://ec.europa.eu/transparencyregister/public/homePage.do). In line with the provisions of the Code of Ethics, paragraph 3.26, Enel does not nance political paies, their representatives or candidates in Italy or abroad, nor does it sponsor conventions or events whose sole purpose is political propaganda. It refrains from any direct or indirect pressure on politicians (for example, by granting the use of its facilities, accepting recruiting recommendations, or awarding consultancy contracts). Enel and its subsidiaries are present in various trade and employer associations whose role includes representing the positioning of its members in the regulatory processes inherent in the business activity. The annual contributions paid to the above-mentioned organizations in the form of membership fees in 2020 totaled approximately 8.3 million euros, compared to 7.9 million euros in 20193. In paicular, in 2020 the three largest contributions in terms of overall amount concerned AELEC (Asociación de Empresas de Energía Eléctrica) in Spain, Conndustria and Ele©ricità Futura in Italy4.
The institutional dialogue with the trade and employer associations in which Enel and its subsidiaries took pa in 2020 concerned the suppo of regulatory and consultation processes, including also the following main issues:
development of energy policies: including, among other topics, the strategic outlook of the sector, energy eciency, the growth of renewables, sma grid development and energy costs5;
increasing business competitiveness: including, among other topics, tax regulation, labor law issues and environmental policies6.
102-12 102-15 102-16 102-17 102-25 102-33 103-2 103-3 205-2 205-3 405-1 406-1 408-1 409-1 412-1 412-2 413-1
A solid and dynamic ethical system, constantly oriented towards implementing best practices on the national and international levels is the foundational element of the Enel system of values underpinning the Company's operating assets, and of relations enteained with all its key stakeholders. A system based on compliance programs, including the Code of Ethics, Policy on Human Rights, the Zero Tolerance of Corruption Plan ("ZTC Plan"), Enel Global Compliance Program, the Model pursuant to Italian Legislative Decree 231/01, plus any other national compliance models adopted by Group companies in accordance with local regulations.

In 2002, Enel adopted at Code of Ethics that expresses the commitments and ethical responsibilities to which it adheres in its operating assets, regulating and harmonizing corporate conduct according to standards based on the maximum transparency and integrity towards all stakeholders. The Code of Ethics is applicable to the entire Group, notwithstanding the cultural, social, and economic diversity between the various countries in which Enel operates. Enel also requires all its main suppliers and paners to adopt conduct in line with the Code's general principles.
We draw your a©ention to the fact that in February 2021 the Board of Directors approved a fuher update of the Code of Ethics in order to align the contents with the current situation, the changes that have occurred in the organizational structure and in the Group's procedural system, and with national and international best practices. More information is available on the website h©ps://www.enel.com/investors/ sustainability/sustainability-topics-and-pe¥ormances/principles-underpinning-our-work/code-of-ethics.
Any violation or suspected violation of the ethical system can be repoed, also anonymously, through a single platform at Group level ("Ethics Point"), which is accessible at www.enel.ethicspoint.com. The Audit Function receives and analyses these repos, pe¥orming the related checks and ensuring uniform treatment at Group level, in compliance with company policies and local regulations.
The repos management process is governed by the whistleblowing policy, "Management of anonymous and non-anonymous repos", which guarantees anonymity and protection against any form of retaliation and also ensures adequate protection against groundless repos made maliciously to harm or cause prejudice to individuals and/or companies.
| KPI | UM | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2020-2019 | % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Repo–s received | no. | 151 | 166 | 144 | -15 | -9,0 |
| Violations related to incidents of: (1) | no. | 26 | 38 | 31 | -12 | -31,6 |
| Con•ict of interest/corruption | no. | 2 | 10 | 10 | -8 | -80,0 |
| Misappropriation | no. | 14 | 11 | 7 | 3 | 27,3 |
| Labor practices | no. | 9 | 11 | 8 | -2 | -18,2 |
| Community and society | no. | - | - | - | - | - |
| Other reasons | no. | 1 | 6 | 6 | -5 | -83,3 |
(1) In 2020, the analysis of repos received in 2019 was completed, hence the number of conrmed violations for 2019 was revised from 36 to 38. The two additional violations are to be ascribed to minor cases of private interest in Brazil.
In 2020 a total of 151 repos were received concerning the Code of Ethics, representing a reduction with respect to 2019. Among the repos received there were 2 violation episodes connected to cases of "conict of interest/corruption", in relation to which Enel adopted specic measures against the employees concerned. As far as cases relating to labor practices are concerned, 79 repos were recorded, the analysis of which resulted in the identication of 9 violations: 5 cases for inappropriate conduct and/ or conduct detrimental to personal dignity and 4 cases concerning health and safety issues.
Italian Legislative Decree 231 of June 8, 2001 introduced an administrative (essentially criminal) liability into the Italian legal system for companies in respect of ceain types of oences commi©ed by directors, managers, or employees in the interest of or for the benet of the companies concerned. Already in 2002, Enel – the rst in Italy – adopted an Organizational and Management Model that meets the requirements of Legislative Decree 231/01 (Model 231). Since then, it has been constantly updated in line with the reference regulatory framework and current organizational context.
(3) These amounts include the contributions paid by Enel SpA (including the main Italian companies) and by its foreign subsidiaries Endesa, Enel Américas and Enel Chile.
103-2 103-3 205-1 205-2
In compliance with the 10th Global Compact principle, according to which "companies are commi©ed to combating corruption in all its forms, including extoion and bribery", Enel intends to pursue its commitment to ghting corruption in all its forms – whether direct or indirect – by applying the principles expressed in the pillars of its Anti-bribery Management System.
Enel's Anti-Bribery Management System (ABMS) is based on the Group's commitment to ghting corruption by applying the criteria of transparency and conduct as set out in the Zero Tolerance for Corruption Plan (ZTC Plan) and conrmed in the Anti-Bribery Policy adopted in compliance with international standard ISO 37001:2016 (on anti-bribery management systems).
Together with the ZTC Plan, the pillars underpinning the ABMS are:
the Code of Ethics;
Models to prevent the main criminal risks (for example, bribery in relations with public administrations and among private individuals, environmental oences, corporate oences and, for Italian companies, manslaughter, serious personal injury or grievous bodily harm commi©ed in violation of the rules on the protection of occupational health and safety), as described by the applicable regulations on corporate responsibility (the "Compliance Program") in the various countries where the Group operates (for example, Organizational Model 231 for Italian companies, the "Risk Prevention Model/ Integrity Program" for Group companies in Spain and South America);
the Enel Global Compliance Program ("EGCP"), a governance tool aimed at strengthening the Group's ethical and professional commitment to preventing illicits commi©ed outside Italy that might result in corporate criminal liability and reputational risks. The EGCP applies to the Group's non-Italian companies and supplements any compliance programs adopted by the same companies, in compliance with local regulations.
The mentioned governance measures (in relation to which we refer you to the specic section of the website), together with the current body of procedures, outline an eective prevention system, which is an integral pa of the Group's Internal Control System.

Our corporate strategy is aiculated around the core concept of contributing to building a fairer and more inclusive society throughout the entire value chain, protecting the environment in which we live and creating oppounities for the future for the Company and for our stakeholders. Our commitment to respect for human rights is the common thread that guides our activities, fully integrated in our purpose and throughout our corporate values. Specically, Enel promotes respect for all internationally recognized human rights in the area of its business relations and it requires adoption of the same principles by contractors, suppliers, and commercial paners, with special a©ention to high risk contexts or conict situations.
To ensure optimal respect for our commitments, in 2020 we launched a new due diligence7 phase in order to guarantee constant monitoring of operations related to the entire value chain through the revision of the existing procedures and processes. The areas of improvement and action plans were nalized in the initial months of 2021 and will be completed within 2022. A total of around 170 actions have been planned, covering 100% of operations and sites. A new specic methodology will be dened on the global level to apply the due diligence to human rights to single assets, and also integrations of the existing procedures will be assessed in order to extend the assessment to our nancial paners.
In conrmation of our commitment, in 2020 approximately 1.5 million training hours were delivered on sustainability topics (up by 29.4% compared to the prior year), of which human rights are a fundamental pa; specically, the courses mainly addressed environmental and worker health and safety issues, with an average of 21.7 hours of training per capita, representing an increase with respect to the 2019 gure (16.5 hours). Also available is an online training course dedicated to the topic of human rights, with which Enel engages all people in the Company by sharing experiences and best practices that highlight the key role of human rights. In 2020 more than 5 thousand

In 2017 Enel SpA was among the rst companies in the world to obtain ceication of the conformity of its anti-bribery management system to international standard ISO 37001:2016 ("Anti-Bribery Management System"). This ceication was issued following an independent verication process, carried out by a primary accredited ceication body, which was carried out in two separate phases, aimed primarily at ceifying the adequacy of the design of the Enel anti-bribery management system (in terms of governance, roles, and responsibilities, control procedures, etc.), and secondarily at assessing the level of application and eectiveness.
After Enel SpA obtained ceication ISO 37001 for its anti-bribery management system, it gradually extended the 37001 ceication plan to the Group's main Italian and foreign subsidiaries, guaranteeing maintenance of the cei cations already obtained.
training hours were delivered on human rights topics, by means of a dedicated online course.
Transparency and ethics are core elements for our Company, which is why we collect and analyze feedback received from our stakeholders. As stated in the stakeholder repos section, all violations or suspected violations can be repoed, also anonymously, by means of a single platform at Group level ("Ethics Point"), which is accessible at www.enel. ethicspoint.com.
In 2013 the Company adopted the Policy on Human Rights, approved by the Board of Directors of Enel SpA and of each of its subsidiaries. A commitment that strengthens and deepens the values and pillars of corporate ethics based on the Code of Ethics, on the Zero Tolerance for Corruption Plan and on the Model 231.
The policy references the UN Guiding Principles for Business and Human Rights (UNGP) approach – "Protect, Respect and Remedy" – and the principles outlined by the OECD Guidelines for multinational enterprises, designed to promote sustainable management of the business model, and by the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights and the Declaration of the International Labour Organization on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work. By adopting these principles and standards, Enel promotes respect of all internationally recognized human rights, including opposition to human tracking, equal remuneration, and the rights of indigenous peoples.
The Policy identies eight principles, considered to be those of the greatest impact for the Group's operations, classifying them in two macro-issues – labor practices and community relations – that all Enel SpA people and those of its subsidiaries must respect in the pursuit of their activities. Enel also promotes respect for said principles in the context of all its business relations and compliance with the same standards by its contractors, suppliers, and commercial paners, paying special a©ention to high-risk or conict-aected contexts.
The Policy also outlines a governance system which is entrusted with the tasks of implementing and monitoring the activities dened by the Group for the protection and respect of human rights. The tasks include the adoption of a process of due diligence on human rights.
(7) In the context of the Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights (Principles 17-21), this term refers to a continuously evolving management system implemented by a company, adapting it to the peculiarities of its supply chain and in accordance with the sector in which it works, its operating contexts, its organizational structure, to ensure it is not involved in human rights violations, either directly or indirectly. This implies "identifying, preventing, mitigating and repoing" potential negative impacts deriving from the Company's business activities.
acting through the Control and Risks Commi©ee and the Corporate Governance and Sustainability Committee, the Board of Directors is responsible for examining the main company rules and procedures connected to the Internal Control and Risk Management System of relevance in relation to stakeholders – among which we mention in paicular the Organizational and Management Model implemented pursuant to Italian Legislative Decree 231/01, the Code of Ethics, the "Zero Tolerance for Corruption" Plan and the Policy on Human Rights – and submit the documents in question to the approval of the Board of Directors, assessing possible subsequent amendments or integrations;
the Innovability Function, and, in paicular, the Sustainability Planning and Pe¥ormance Management and Human Rights unit, is responsible for managing the positioning on human rights and the associated internal and external communication activities concerning the actions taken, and integrating the Policy on Human Rights in corporate processes and guaranteeing the execution of due diligence activities. Moreover, on an annual basis it repos Enel's pe¥ormance with respect to the commitments assumed in relation to human rights in the Group Sustainability Repo;
the various company units are responsible for implementing the Policy on Human Rights in their respective areas of competence.
As required by the UN guidelines and based on the Policy principles, Enel has developed a specic process of due diligence of human rights across the entire value chain in the dierent countries in which it operates. In line with the international reference standards, the process is broken down into four phases:
In 2020 the analysis was carried out in accordance with the above described phases, terminating with approval of the specic improvement plans, the actions of which will

be adopted in 2021 and 2022. The rst two phases of the due diligence process are shown below, while the other two phases are described in the next section "REMEDY: Improvement plans".
By consulting signicant stakeholders and expes in the various sectors, namely civil society, and academic institutions, originating from the various contexts in which the Company operates, Enel has conducted a context analysis to be©er identify the issues concerning human rights and the most signicant connected risks. Specically, consultations were held with direct and indirect workers, representatives of indigenous populations and local communities, trade unions and local institutions.
The topics included in the Policy on Human Rights were then classied based on the perceived risk level, calculated taking into consideration the seriousness and probability of an eective violation8.

LIKELIHOOD

issues relating to bribery and environmental impacts have a "high-priority risk" score, requiring companies to implement advanced control and monitoring mechanisms;
issues strictly connected to labor practices (freedom of association and collective bargaining, rejection of forced labor and child labor, dissemination of just and favorable working conditions, health and safety in the workplace, diversity, and inclusion) and to the mitigation of impacts on local communities are assessed as "risk to control". Protection of local communities is more relevant in South American countries, in line with the results of the previous assessment cycle;
the topic of health and safety in the workplace continues to be perceived as a critical area to control and monitor in all Group countries.
A gap analysis was pe¥ormed based on the perceived risk assessment aimed at evaluating the practices and policies adopted to protect human rights in all Group countries. In paicular, interviews were conducted with top management and the various areas of the value chain were ana-

lyzed in relation to more than 100 indicators. The assessment considered the four parameters of the operative principles dened by the UNGP:
public commitment to protect human rights;
adoption of human rights due diligence process;
preparation of a plan of action to remedy any gaps identied by the due diligence process;
adaptation to match local context and regulations.
Fuhermore, the signicant information of the due diligence process and the Group's commitment to respect human rights are provided in compliance with the UNGP Repoing Framework.
By means of the management system due diligence activity, the Company is in a position to evaluate 100% of the policies and operational procedures adopted for execution of its direct and indirect operations (e.g. operations concerning the entire value chain and those connected to the establishment of new business relations).
The analysis showed that Enel has a robust set of mechanisms and management systems to protect against possible human rights violations, so the identied risks can be adequately managed.
(8) The risks are classied based on the assessment scale: acceptable risk (minimum level), risk to control, high-priority risk, high risk (maximum level).
| Topics | Average perceived risk |
System to protect human rights |
Main policies and procedures to protect human rights |
SDG |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Labor practices | ||||
| Freedom of association and |
to control | Robust | Enel is commi©ed to respecting the freedom and collective bargai ning rights of its employees. In pa–icular, Enel recognizes their right to set up or join organizations formed to defend and promote their interests; it recognizes their right to representation by union orga nizations or other forms of representation, opposing any action of discrimination in the exercise of this right; it recognizes their right to engage in collective bargaining as the preferred instrument to establish the contractual conditions and to regulate relations betwe en company management and trade unions. |
8 |
| collective bargaining to control |
Robust | The contracts considered overall regulate labor conditions, clearly | 8 | |
| Rejection of forced labor | to control | Robust | dening workers' rights (working hours, remuneration, ove–ime, in demnity, benets). Each worker is guaranteed a translated employ |
8 |
| Fair and favorable working da controllare | Robusto | ment contract in his/her native language. Human resources mana gement systems and procedures guarantee the absence of minors in the workforce. Also apprenticeship projects and school-work expe rience models are carried out. |
8 | |
| conditions | to control | Robust | For details, consult the "Our people" chapter. | 5, 10 |
| Rejection of child labor | to control | Robust | For details, consult the "Occupational health and safety" chapter. | 3 |
| Community and society | ||||
| Community relations | to control | Robust | For details, consult the "Local and global communities" chapter. | 1, 3, 4, 5, 7, 9, 10 |
| Environmental impacts | high priority | Robust | For details, consult the "Environmental sustainability" chapter. | 13 |
| Corruption | high priority | Robust | For details, consult the "Active and passive anti-corruption" section. 16 |
Average perceived risk: average perceived risk levels identied in the Countries under analysis.
Reference scale of risks: 1. High risk; 2. High-priority risk; 3. Risk to control; 4. Acceptable risk.
Reference scale of peormance values: Robust (75%-100%); Good (50%-75%); Sucient (25%-50%); To be improved (0%-25%).
By means of the due diligence activity in relation to the management system, the Company can assess 100% of the policies and operational procedures adopted in order to identify the risks of its direct and indirect operations (e.g. new acquisitions, mergers, joint ventures, etc.).
The perceived risk assessment, together with the gap analysis, makes it possible to assess the residual risk and dene any improvement actions required. Specic action plans have therefore been developed for each country of presence, as well as a centrally managed improvement plan to harmonize and integrate, at the global level, processes and policies to be applied at the local level. A total of around 170 actions have been planned, covering 100% of operations and sites. The plans were launched at the sta of 2021 and are scheduled for completion within 2022. Below, we give several examples of targeted actions in the single countries in which the Group operates:
in Italy: integration of Infrastructure and Networks business development policies;
in Russia: development of specic training activities;
in Argentina: internal awareness raising campaigns;
in Brazil: denition of an operating instruction in order to assess management of human rights of paners and sub-tier suppliers;
in Chile: campaigns for communication with external stakeholders and, especially, with local community representatives.
Labor rights issues are generally perceived as lower risk and also the related control measures and processes are in compliance with both the principles of the main international guidelines and with the Group's internal policies. Notwithstanding, several minor areas of improvement were identied, as shown schematically in the table below.
Development inclusive of disability is an essential condition for a sustainable future. In 2015, the United Nations adopted the 2030 Agenda, undeaking to make sure no one gets left behind. This therefore calls for a tangible action to include the one billion people with disabilities in the world, constituting 15% of the entire population, both as agents and bene ciaries of development.
Diversity in general and disability in paicular are among the topics in the Enel Policy on Human Rights and they are subject to the related due diligence. In 2020, a detailed analysis was carried out on the topic of disability, engaging nine categories of stakeholders including employees, suppliers, customers, social paners, and institutions, through the administration of more than 2 thousand questionnaires in 15 countries. The results were subsequently examined with the suppo of external expes, categorized in four clusters (accessibility, governance, product & facility design, normative framework) and the risk perception of stakeholders was dened in relation to the topic in accordance with a scale of the perceived risk level (high risk, high-priority risk, medium risk, and low risk). The aspects linked to accessibility and governance were considered to be high priority, but they simultaneously reected the eective adoption of best practices accompanied by a signicant awareness raising campaign.
Paicipation in 2019 in the "Valuable 500" initiative gave rise in 2020 to the global "Value for Disability" project aimed at promoting full inclusion of people with disabilities in Enel, in the communities in which we operate, and among our customers. Our strategy is aimed at freeing the potential of disability in terms of organizational development, business, and innovation oppounities of the context. Specically, the project aim is to valorize the abilities of each individual, placing them in relation with the specic social, structural, and organizational factors of each area. This relational perspective also resulted in the creation of new analytical tools designed to highlight the needs of the individual and the possible inclusion actions available to the Company.
The project was organized and managed by an internal PMO that coordinated the work of multifunction teams, engaging people from the various countries in which the Group operates. The global team and local teams were set up by representatives of the Sustainability, People and Organization, and Global Digital Solutions Functions together with the Market and Enel X area, Communications and all the Business Lines. Fuhermore, the Country focal points for disability already present in the Company and the creation of local Disability Communities were fundamental in relation to their role of collecting needs, developing and testing the proposed solutions. Associations were consulted, the current proposals of existing businesses in the world were tested by means of scouting and a learning tour with other companies and, nally, an internal training initiative made it possible to create a common language for all the countries involved. The project considered the main results that emerged during the due diligence process of the human rights management system and, in paicular, those related to the perceived risk analysis carried out in the single countries. This analysis made it possible to:
contextualize the dierent sensitivities of the main stakeholders interviewed in relation to the diversity topic;
dene analysis clusters (Governance, Product Design, Customer Care) to catalogue the best practices present
The global disability action plan was presented to the Enel Board of Directors and the specic local action plans were presented to the various Country Managers.
The commitment on the disability topic was also valorized in the new version of the Code of Ethics, which introduced an explicit reference to the topic of accessibility (see Code of Ethics section), and also in the 2021-2023 Sustainability Plan. For fuher details, refer to the chapters: "Our people", "Electrication, digital and platforms" and "Local and global community".

| Topics | Business lines | Countries | Areas of improvement |
|---|---|---|---|
| Freedom of association and collective bargaining |
Sustainability/People and Organi zation |
Greece, Australia, India, Brazil |
Intensication of training on human rights, with a special focus on relations with social pa–ners and denition of working conditions during bargaining procedures |
| Rejection of forced labor | People and Organization/Sustain ability/ Communication |
Romania, Brazil | Integration of control procedures and denition of fur ther remedies in the case of intimidation and threats |
| Rejection of child labor | Global Procurement/Legal and Corporate A˜airs |
Russia, Chile, Brazil |
Intensication of training and monitoring of the supply chain |
| Diversity | Sustainability, People and Organi zation |
Mexico, Romania, Brazil |
Each action plan includes activities on the topic of dis ability based on the main ndings resulting from the Value for Disability project (see box) |
(1) Within diversity issues, the assessment subject also includes aspects related to equal remuneration and non-discrimination.
In line with the Voluntary Principles on Security and Human Rights, Enel is commi©ed to ensuring that the private security forces working to protect Group personnel and property in the operating areas act in compliance with the applicable national laws and international rules and standards, while simultaneously encouraging public law enforcement agencies to act in the same manner" (paragraph 2.2.1 of Enel's Policy on Human Rights). In general, according to national regulations, the security service can only be assigned only to public forces, or to private forces in the absence of legislative provisions. Security management in Enel is entrusted to a dedicated Holding unit and to specic units in the various countries in which the Group operates. The action principles concern:
proactivity: continuous collection of data and information for the detection and interpretation of weak signals;
holistic vision: integrated assessment and management of security risks for all potentially exposed assets (people, infrastructure, and intangible assets);
Open Power: cooperation with the Business Lines, reference institutions and other critical infrastructure operators;
resilience: adoption of measures to ensure operating continuity of the system and not merely its passive protection.
Protection and processing of personal data are an impo ant challenge for Enel in the era of digitalization and market globalization and also a constant commitment to ensure continuous improvement of the services we supply to our customers.
To face this challenge, according with the provisions of the General Data Protection Regulation (EU) 2016/679, in 2017 Enel set up a specic unit within the Legal Function (Data Protection O¢ce) and appointed the "Data Protection O¢cers" (DPO). The DPOs are appointed based on their professional skills and knowledge and their ability to carry out the assigned tasks in accordance with the principle of independence. The Data Protection Oce is structured as follows:
Data Protection Governance: monitors the evolution of data protection legislation and denes the Group's compliance. The oce also carries out the role of DPO in countries in which local legislation law does not require a DPO;
Holding and Global Service Functions Data Protection: promotes privacy by design from phase of process planning at the global level and ensures its consistent development at the national level;
Global Business Lines Data Protection: suppos the Global Business Lines'compliance concerning data protection, and monitors the evolution of data protection ceication mechanisms for products and services;
Country units: for the protection of national data with the task of monitoring the evolution of legislation at the local level. In 2020 DPOs oce were set up in South
America (Argentina, Brazil, Chile, Colombia, Peru), alongside the European area units already in place (Italy, Pougal, Romania, Spain).
Internal tools were developed based on the size and complexity of Enel, in order to guarantee compliance of protection of personal data and promotion of data to foster the presence of Enel in the European data economy, including the record of personal data processing activities and data protection impact assessment (DPIA - Data Protection Impact Assessment). The DPOs implement processes and activities in compliance with applicable data protection laws and are commi©ed to drawing up data protection agreements and clauses; planning data governance and corporate policies; providing privacy consulting in the design phase; ensuring adequate risk management by making intensive use of the DPIA and monitoring the consistency of data protection policies within the organization, especially among European and non-European legal entities.
In 2020, the Group's European companies handled more than 24 thousand9 communications concerning personal data protection from customers, and collaborated with the national authorities, receiving 100 requests for information and clarications from which two penalties emerged against the Romanian company Enel Energie Muntenia.
In Italy, Servizio Ele©rico Nazionale previously repoed the Authority for the Protection of Personal Data in advance an incident concerning the personal data of several ex-employees with electricity supply that occurred following a cyber a©ack that occurred on October 19 (refer to the "Cyber security incident management" section). On December 23, 2020, the Authority completed the investigation of the personal data breach that was the subject of the notication and closed the case. In addition, with regard to Enel Energia, the company notied the Authority for the Protection of Personal Data of three data breaches: the rst in January 2020 concerning the theft from a store of several electricity supply contracts; the second in March 2020, due to the publication of data (personal details, contact data and contractual data from 2013) of around 3,640 customers on a website (procedure dismissed by the Data Commissioner on July 28, 2020); the third in June 2020 originating from the theft, by four ex-employees of a paner agency of Enel Energia, of copies of the contracts they managed during their term of employment.
With regard to e-distribuzione, the company notied the Authority for the Protection of Personal Data of a data

breach because, in June 2020 a contractor company accidentally disclosed a databased on the Internet containing the details of 400 thousand customers (name and surname, POD code and address) connected to the e-distribuzione network.
In Romania E-Distribuție Banat, E-Distribuție Dobrogea, E-Distribuție Muntenia, together with Enel Energie and Enel Energie Muntenia, informed the competent authority of a presumed data breach concerning customers' personal data which occurred following a cyber a©ack experienced on October 19 (refer to the "Cyber security incident management" section).
In Spain, Endesa Energía SAU and Energía XXI suered a personal data breach that was repoed to the competent authority on April 3, 2020.
Also, in Brazil Enel Distribuição São Paulo logged a data breach in November 2020 related to personal data of some customers. The company immediately activated its security protocols in order to mitigate the impact of the incident. In parallel, the above company informed the competent authorities of the data breach and has also adequately informed the customers involved.
(9) The dierence compared to the 2019 gure (more than 40 thousand communications) is due to a more granular application of the criteria employed, which made it possible to identify customer communications concerning personal data protection with greater clarity.

TOPIC VIEW



Enel is an industrial group whose main activity involves energy generation, distribution and sales. The choice of countries where the Group operates is guided by business assessments and not by tax reasons.
Since 2017, the Enel Group has adopted a tax strategy, as a set of principles and guidelines inspired by values of transparency and legality, which is published on the website: www.enel.com. The Group's subsidiaries are required to adopt the tax strategy approved by the Parent Company, thereby assuming the responsibility of ensuring it is acknowledged and applied.
Enel SpA's Board of Directors sets out the tax strategy of the entire Group, with the aim of ensuring uniform tax management for all entities involved. The strategy is underpinned by the following approach:
correct and timely determination and se©lement of taxes due under the law and implementation of the respective obligations;
correct management of the tax risk, which is the risk incurred for the violation of tax rules or abuse of the principles and purposes of the tax system.
The tax strategy principles are the guidelines for Group companies, underpinning their business operations when managing the scal variable. The principles also require suitable processes to be adopted to ensure their eectiveness and application.
Values: in line with its sustainability strategy, the Group acts in accordance with the values of honesty and integrity in its tax management, being well aware that tax revenue is one of the main sources of contribution to economic and social development of the countries where it operates.
Legality: the Group pursues behavior geared towards compliance with the applicable tax rules and is commi©ed to interpreting them in a way that respects both the substance and form.
Tone at the top: the Board of Directors has the role and responsibility of leading the dissemination of a corporate culture based on the values of honesty and integrity and the principle of legality.
Transparency: the Group maintains collaborative and transparent relations with tax authorities, enabling them – among other things – to gain a full understanding of the facts underlying the application of tax rules.
Shareholder value: the Group considers tax to be a business cost and, as such, believes that it must be managed in compliance with the principle of legality, with the aim of safeguarding the Group's assets and pursuing the primary interest of creating value for shareholders in the medium to long term.
Enel SpA ensures that the tax strategy is acknowledged and applied within the Company through the governance bodies. Its interpretation is left to the Parent Company, through the Tax unit, which also manages its periodic updates.
The Group entities must respect the principle of legality, by swiftly applying the tax laws of the countries where the Group operates, to ensure that the wording, spirit and purpose of the applicable tax rule or system is respected. Moreover, the Enel Group does not undeake behaviors or domestic or cross-border operations that result in purely aicial constructions, that do not reect the economic reality and from which it is reasonable to expect undue tax advantages, where they conict with the purpose or spirit of tax provisions or system in question and give rise to double deduction, deduction/non-inclusion or double non-taxation, including as a result of any divergence between the tax systems of dierent jurisdictions.

All intercompany transactions follow a transfer pricing policy, which has been adopted by the Enel Group in line with the arm's length principle, an international standard established by the Model Tax Convention and referred to in the OECD Transfer Pricing Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises and Tax Administrations (hereinafter also referred to as the "OECD Guidelines"). Intercompany relations are structured at market prices and conditions, ensuring value creation in the places where the Group conducts its business. In order to minimize tax risks, and in line with the applicable regulations, the Enel Group encourages the signing of rulings (Advance Pricing Agreements – APAs) with local tax authorities on establishing transfer pricing determination methods, on a©ributing gains and losses to permanent establishments and on applying rules on cross-border ows between Group entities.
For intercompany nancial transactions, the Enel Group has adopted a centralized nance model for its subsidiaries, which requires the Group's two nancial companies, Enel Finance International (EFI) and Enel Finance America (EFA), to centralize pa of the treasury activities and access to nancial markets, and to act as the primary point of reference for the management of the nancial or liquidity needs generated by operating entities.
These intercompany payables may be recorded either at amoized cost, using the eective interest rate method, or at fair value as required by IFRS 13.
Based on the OECD Guidelines, the pricing method to be used to test the arm's length nature of a transaction between associated companies is one which is based on the facts and circumstances of the transaction under analysis and which is able to provide the most reliable measure in line with the market.
Where transactions with comparable characteristics can be identied on the open market (e.g. indexation, maturity, amoization schedule), the comparable uncontrolled price (CUP) method is the most direct and reliable method for applying the arm's length principle. This method is therefore preferred over any other in such cases.
As such, the Group has put internal policies in place to suppo the methods set out in the OECD Guidelines, whereby the CUP method is applied in the rst instance.

The Group does not invest in or through countries considered to be tax havens for the sole purpose of reducing its tax burden. Such investments may only be proposed if they are suppoed by sound economic/strategic reasons and have the aim of developing the activities included in the Group's corporate purpose.
If, in circumstantial situations (for example, in the event of third-pay purchases of a group of companies), structures were found to have been created for the sole purpose of reducing the tax burden or in areas deemed to be tax havens, the Group – failing any viable economic/strategic reasons other than mere tax savings – will commit to removing such structures as quickly as possible.
Tax incentives are a key, development-oriented mechanism for economic policy, which countries use to stimulate growth and a©ract investment to suppo the national policy. The use of tax incentives generally results in a reduction of long-term tax liabilities. Some countries where the Enel Group operates oer various incentives. The Enel Group only uses widely applicable tax incentives for all operators, respecting all specic regulations, where the incentives are in line with its industrial and operational objectives and are consistent with the economic substance of its investments.
In Enel's organizational model, the Holding Company's Tax Affairs unit is tasked – among other things – with developing the Group's tax strategy, identifying, analyzing and managing the various optimization initiatives, monitoring the key tax issues and providing its support to the various Business Lines. Alongside the Holding Function, the Tax Affairs units of the various countries – acting in accordance with the values and principles of the tax strategy set out by the Holding Company – are responsible for managing compliance, tax planning and tax monitoring at local level.
The Enel Group has adopted a set of rules, procedures and standards which are pa of the Group's wider organization and control system and which are considered key points of reference that all paies, depending on their type of relationship with the Group, are required to observe1 . The various policies and procedures applicable both at Group level and country level govern the activities, as well as their management procedures and Tax Aairs responsibilities including in relation to other corporate Functions. These documents are published on the company Intranet and are accessible to all Enel people; they form the general rules of conduct applicable within the Group when carrying out activities. Specically in relation to taxation, in addition to the tax strategy there are specic organizational documents – both at global and local level – regarding the processes of tax compliance, tax planning, tax monitoring, transfer pricing and tax risk management.
The general principle is that the Tax units must be the appropriate size and equipped with the necessary skills to pe¥orm the role of a decision-making analysis centre within the governance and business processes, in addition to the role of overseeing pe¥ormance. For this purpose, specic and ongoing training initiatives on tax issues at both country and global level are set up, with recurring meetings between all of the Group's Tax Managers in order to ensure the appropriate alignment.
(1) For example: Code of Ethics; Zero Tolerance of Corruption Plan; Enel Global Compliance Program (EGCP), corporate policies, models and procedures; the tax strategy; the Internal Control and Risk Management System; the proxy system; the sanctions system referred to in the applicable CCNL (national collective bargaining agreement); any other documentation relating to the current control systems; the relevant accounting standards; procedures and IT applications.

Tax risks
The Group has a Tax Control Framework (TCF) whose main aim is to provide the Tax units with a single and consistent set of guidance for adopting a correct and eective approach to tax risk management within the Group. The framework sets out guidelines and methodological rules so as to consistently assess, monitor and manage the relevant tax risk for the Group companies, in accordance with the principles and guidelines set out by the tax strategy and Tax Risk Policy, and in the awareness that the Group companies operating in dierent jurisdictions must adopt the TCF with respect for the specic corporate context and domestic regulations of each individual country in question.
In this regard, the Group has adopted a Tax Risk Policy whose main objective is to provide unambiguous and consistent guidance to the tax units when implementing the TCF at local level.
In accordance with the established principles and guidelines, the Enel Group aims to proactively manage the tax risk and believes that adopting a TCF can ensure the timely detection, correct measurement and control of the risk tax. The task of the TCF is to identify the sources of tax risk for the purpose of compliance interpreting tax regulations, while mapping out the respective processes and activities in order to form a network of risk detectors, to be associated with the resulting control measures. In paicular, as the set of detectors and control measures identify sources of risk, the TCF can pe¥orm a broad spectrum of control. As such, any materialization of the tax risk can be intercepted and managed by each Tax unit in question.
The eectiveness and ongoing updates of the TCF are ensured through periodic monitoring of the risk mapping, regular internal audit processes, as well as through the tax authority systems set out under cooperative compliance regimes (where implemented).
The results from the monitoring of tax risks are periodically brought to the a©ention of the competent Functions and corporate bodies, including to establish the most appropriate way to mitigate such risks. With regard to signicant uncertain tax positions, reference should be made to the information and comments provided in the Integrated Annual Repo 2020.
For the Enel Group, tax compliance is considered a key aspect of the Company's ethical and responsible management. As such, the violations that can be repoed through the Company's internal channels also include those relating to tax. The Group's Code of Ethics is the framework of "ethical management" in which Enel operates, also tying in fully with the tax strategy. There are appropriate provisions on Code of Ethics violations to ensure its eective implementation, and these requirements must also be considered to cover the provisions of the tax strategy.
The Enel Group ensures transparency and integrity in its relations with tax authorities, in the event of audits on both the Group companies and third paies. To consolidate this transparency with tax authorities, the Enel Group promotes engagement in co-operative compliance schemes for companies that integrate the requirements of their respective domestic regulations in order to reinforce their relations. It also complies with the transfer pricing documentation provisions in accordance with OECD Guidelines, taking the "three-tiered approach" which is divided into: Master File, Local File and Country-by-Country Repo. Moreover, to avoid double taxation, the Group promotes mutual agreement procedures for the se©lement of international disputes (Mutual Agreement Procedure – MAP), which have the direct involvement of tax authorities from the contracting countries. Lastly, Enel consistently acts with a transparent and collaborative approach with all institutions and associations to suppo the development of eective tax systems in the various countries where it operates.
In 2019, Enel joined the European Business Tax Forum (EBTF), an association operating since 2017 that aims to open up a public debate on taxation by providing a balanced and comprehensive perspective of the taxes paid by companies. In view of this objective, tax information is provided to the various stakeholders. The Forum has published two studies relating to the EU/EFTA Total Tax Contribution for the years 2018 and 2019, which are available on the association's website (h©ps://ebtforum.org) and which repo the aggregate data for the various types of taxes paid by the largest European multinational companies by turnover and/
At a Glance Our ESG peormance Trend Topic Appendix
or by stock market capitalization, as well as, for the year 2019, a dedicated section with Country-by-Country Repoing.
Acting with honesty and integrity is one of the main cornerstones of our tax strategy, as is our commitment to transparency.
The publication of Country-by-Country Repoing2 integrated with the detail of our overall tax contribution in the main economies in which the Group operates (hereafter also "Tax Transparency Repo"), underlines the impoance that the Group a©ributes to tax related topics, to their social role and, in general, to transparency as a factor that facilitates sustainable development.
The approach followed also aims to eliminate potential ambiguities that may derive from complex accounting and tax treatments, while suppoing and, at the same time, improving other annual nancial information and continuing along a pathway targeted at supplying an increasingly indepth and clear vision of our tax position.
As of 2018 (2018-2017), we have adopted a Total Tax Contribution model for the main countries where we operate, providing evidence of taxes paid and withheld.
Beginning 2020, on the other hand, we adopted an integrated model: the Tax Transparency Repo. This is prepared consistently with the rules provided for under OSCE Country-by-Country Repoing3 and includes information and data for Total Tax Contributions in the main countries where we are present.
The integrated model of the Tax Transparency Repo is available on our site (h©ps://www.enel.com/en/investors1/ sustainability-pe¥ormance). The Group believes that this model ensures a broad vision and a detailed measurement of the organization's contributions to economic and social development in the regions/countries in which it operates.
The Tax Transparency Repo adopts the cash criterion as a general principle for representing tax data, considering it to be the most adequate for disclosing the actual tax contribution.
More specically, the total tax data, as dened and detailed in what follows, is determined through the various taxes paid4 by all the entities in the scope of each tax jurisdiction in the year subject to repoing, regardless of the tax year to which the taxes refer.
As anticipated previously, on applying an approach adopted by the OCSE5, the Tax Transparency Repo classies the dierent taxes into categories and distinguishes them between those that constitute an expense for a company (taxes borne) and those that the company pays due to rebate mechanisms, substitution etc. (taxes collected) but that, at any rate, are the result of the company's own economic activities.
Specically, taxes, both borne and collected, are classied into the following ve macro categories.
Prot - Income taxes6: this category includes taxes on company prots that can be both borne (e.g. corporate income tax that may be levied on State or local level, trade tax on business prots, solidarity surcharge, as well as taxes withheld at source) and collected, in the case where they are applied to a third pay or to a

physical person (e.g. withholding taxes on interest income, royalties, subcontractors and suppliers).
Propey Propey taxes: taxes on the ownership, use or transfer of tangible or intangible propey. This category includes both taxes borne (e.g. taxes on ownership and use of propey; capital tax levied on share capital increase, transfer taxes on the acquisition or disposal of assets, net wealth and capital transactions; registration duties; stamp duties related to transfer of real estate; stamp duty on share transfers; tax on nancial operation sleviedon transactions involving foreign loans or nancing, etc.), and taxes collected (e.g. rental of business duty collected by the leaser and paid to the government).
Employment tax: this category generally includes taxes on employment, including those on income tax and social security paiments. Taxes levied on the employer are considered taxes borne (e.g. social security contributions, health insurance, pensions, disabilement contributions), while taxes levied on the employee are considered as taxes collected (e.g. personal income tax or social security contributions levied on the employee which are normally withheld by the employer).
Products Taxes on products and services: indirect taxes levied on production, sale or use of goods and services, including taxes and duties levied on international trade and transactions. This category includes taxes that can be paid by businesses with reference

to their own consumption of goods and services, notwithstanding that these may be paid to the supplier of the goods and services, rather than directly to the government. This category includes both taxes borne (e.g. consumption tax; tuornover tax; excise duties; customs duties; impo duties; taxes on insurance contracts; taxes on the use and ownership of motor vehicles; unrecoverable VAT) and taxes collected (e.g. net VAT paid).
Planet - Environmental taxes: taxes levied on the supply, use or consumption of goods and services considered harmful to the environment. Examples of taxes borne are: taxes on the value of the electricity production, taxes on the production of nuclear fuels and carbon tax and of taxes collected: tax on electricity and tax on hydrocarbons.
Fuhermore, the nancial-equity data represented follow the accounting requirements below.
Source of the data: the data represented in the repo are expressed on the basis of IFRS-EU accounting principles adopted by the Group and are at stand-alone entity level. Subsequently, these are aggregated by tax jurisdiction.
To take account of intercompany relations, the data are represented according to logic of aggregation by tax jurisdiction (that is, the Country in which the entities are resident for tax purposes and with scal autonomy) and not a logic of consolidation.
Entities within the scope: falling within the scope of the repo are all those companies consolidated using the full consolidation method or the propoional method (hereafter also "entity within the scope") on the basis of accounting principles used for the drafting of the Consolidated Financial Statements on the pa of the Ultimate Parent Entity (Enel SpA)7 .
With reference to the list of companies in the Group and their activities, please refer to the specic prospectus in the Integrated Annual Repo 20208.
Currency: the repo considers the euro as the currency of
(2) See the circular Assonime (Association of Italian Joint Stock Companies) no. 1/2021. Gli obblighi di trasparenza in materia di tassazione nelle dichiarazioni non nanziarie secondo lo standard GRI 207 (Transparency obligations in the ma©er of taxation in Non Financial Disclosures according to standard GRI 207), in which it is claried that it is possible to make reference to Country-by-Country repos sent to the Agenzie delle Entrate (Italian Revenue Agency) made public voluntarily, even if they are related to the preceding tax period with respect to the time period considered in the Non-Financial Disclosure. In this regard, the Group has decided to repo the information for the current year, prepared consistently with the rules provided for under OSCE Country-by-Country Repoing, actually anticipating by a year the activities required for tax repoing.
(3) Beginning 2018, the Enel Group presented the Country-by-Country Repos for the years 2016, 2017, 2018 and 2019. This was by way of transmission thereof to the Italian Agenzia delle Entrate which in turn supplied them to the other States with which an agreement is in force for the exchange of information, in compliance with the indications of Action 13 of the BEPS project, as amended. Action 13 is a project in which the OCSE and the countries of the G20 have paicipated to reply in a coordinated and shared manner to the strategies of aggressive tax planning put in place by multinational companies with a view to "ai cially shifting" prots in jurisdictions characterized as tax havens.
(4) The data for taxes paid includes payments on account, taxes related for previous years, including after assessments, net of refunds obtained. Interest and penalties are not considered.
(5) Working Paper no. 32, "Legal tax liability remi©ance responsibility and tax incidence".
(6) In line with the repoing criteria applied to Revenues and to Prot (Loss) before taxes explained below, the data solely for income taxes paid excludes the poion of same concerning dividends paid by the companies within the scope, as also indicated by the OCSE in the repo "Guidance on the Implementation of Country-by-Country Repoing" published in December 2019, point II,7.
(7) However, the companies consolidated using the equity method are excluded. Fuhermore, the data of Permanent Establishments are repoed in the jurisdiction of their operations and not in the jurisdiction of residence of associated companies. Therefore, the data of the la©er do not include the data of the Permanent Establishment. Finally, all Stateless companies of the Enel Group are ow-through entities incorporated in the same Country in which income is imputed and is eectively taxed in the paner company (e.g. the United States).
(8) See Assonime circular no. 1/2021, Gli obblighi di trasparenza in materia di tassazione nelle dichiarazioni non nanziarie secondo lo standard GRI 207 (Transparency obligations in the ma©er of taxation in Non-Financial Disclosures according to standard GRI 207), where it is claried that it is possible to make reference to other sources (known as "incorporation by reference") such as the Directors' Repo in the Consolidated Financial Statements or in the annexes for the list of Group companies and their main activities, and the Directors' Repo or other sections of the NFD with regard to information already contained therein on unceain tax positions and on any other information relevant for the purposes of GRI 207.
reference in that it is the one used by the Parent Company. Since IFRS-EU accounting data are extracted in local currencies, economic data (such as revenues, pre-tax prot, taxes accrued and taxes paid) have been conveed into euro at the average exchange rate of the currency, while balance sheet data (tangible xed assets) have been conveed into the euro at the exchange rate in force at year's end.
Third pay revenues: the sum of revenues from third parties accounted for by the entities within the scope in the peinent tax jurisdiction in the year of reference.
The term "revenues" is understood in the broadest possible9 sense to include all revenues, including those from extraordinary operations.
Cross-border intercompany revenues: the sum of revenues from transactions carried out between entities within the scope resident in dierent jurisdictions in the tax year of reference, including income from extraordinary operations and excluding dividends10. 18,395.2
Prot (Loss) before income taxes: the sum of Prots (Losses) before income taxes generated in the year of reference and of all entities within the scope in each tax jurisdiction. The Prots (Losses) before income taxes must include all items involving revenues and extraordinary expenses11. 13,633.5
Corporate income tax accrued (current taxes): the sum of current taxes (i.e. for the current year) on taxable income in the year of reference of all entities within the scope in each tax jurisdiction, independent of whether they have been paid. The data for these does not take account of provisions for tax debts that are not yet ceain as regards either their amount or existence, of adjustment of current taxes for previous years and of prepaid and deferred taxes. Tangible assets: the sum of net accountable values of tangible xed assets resulting from the balance sheet, of all entities within the scope in each tax jurisdiction12. 4,244.6 4,761.7 2020 2019 Total Tax Borne Total Tax Collected
Number of employees and remuneration: the number of employees at the end of the period considering all the entities within the scope; conversely, as regards their remuneration, please see the Sustainability Repo as well as the Tax Transparency Repo.
The total tax contribution (TTC)13 with respect to all the countries in which we operate in 2020 was 16,099.9 million euros, down 2,295.3 million euros (-12.5%) compared to 2019.
The distribution of the overall contribution in the various countries in which the Group operates is given in the following table, with 89% concentrated in Italy, Spain and Brazil, which represent about 80% of Group revenues.
11,855.3
16,099.9
TOTAL TAX CONTRIBUTION (mil euros)


Total Tax Borne (cash accounting) Total Tax Collected (cash accounting) Total tax contribution (cash accounting) - TTC
17.7
(mil euros) Total Tax Borne (cash accounting) Total Tax Collected (cash accounting) Total tax contribution (cash accounting) - TTC
4.244,6 4.761,7
11.855,3
| Chile Chile 198.2 |
|
|---|---|
| 198.2 | 239.0 |
| 40.8 | 239.0 |
| 40.8 |
13.633,5
18.395,2
16.099,9
| Argentina Argentina 173.4 |
||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 173.4 | 284.9 | |||
| 111.5 | 284.9 | |||
| 111.5 |
| Russia | USA and Canada | |
|---|---|---|
| Russia | USA and Canada | |
| 98.1 | 45.3 | |
| 98.1 | 45.3 | |
| 126.9 | 88.8 | |
| 126.9 | 88.8 | |
| 28.7 | 43.4 | |
| 28.7 | 43.4 |
CONTRIBUZIONE FISCALE TOTALE (mln euro)

2020 2019
Totale Tax Borne Totale Tax Collected


23.2 23.2


| Guatemala Guatemala 4.5 |
|
|---|---|
| 4.5 | 7.0 |
| 2.6 | 7.0 |
| 2.6 |

17.7
Costa Rica
(9) Specically, also included are (i) other income, (ii) all extraordinary income (e.g. capital gains from the sale of real estate, unrealized capital gains/capital losses and (iii) nancial income (with the exception of dividends from other companies within the scope) or any extraordinary item. Revenues from income taxes (deriving from deferred tax liabilities or from tax consolidation) are excluded.
(10) Revenues do not include payments received from other entities within the scope that are considered dividends in the tax jurisdiction of the paying subject.
(11) Consistent with the repoing criteria applied to Revenues, Prots (Losses) before income taxes are indicated net of dividends paid by the companies within the scope (as also indicated by the OCSE in the repo "Guidance on the Implementation of Country-by-Country Repoing" published in 2019, point II,7).
(12) Tangible xed assets do not include cash and cash equivalents, intangible assets or nancial assets.
(13) The total tax contribution has been calculated considering the main countries in which the Group is present. These represent more than 98% of revenues and 99% of income taxes paid. For all the other countries the income taxes of the companies have, nonetheless, been indicated in detail. The following countries are included: Italy, Spain, Brazil, Chile, Colombia, Argentina, Guatemala, Peru, Costa Rica, Panama, Romania, Russia, Mexico, the Netherlands, the United States and Canada.
The eects of the Covid-19 pandemic have inuenced the demand for electricity and gas and, consequently, the total tax contribution. Despite the dicult economic conditions, the results of the analysis show that the tax contribution of the Enel Group in the main countries in which it is present remain very signicant.
In this context, characterized by a slow-down in growth in economies the world over and by the increase in the rate of unemployment, taxes linked to revenues/prots go down before those linked to propey and employment, the la©er also due to unemployment benets introduced by many governments.
From the general analysis of the data of the total contribution of the Group divided into the ve tax categories, the following can be highlighted: a tendential stability in property taxes and taxes on employment, the la©er also underlining the stable approach that the Company has had towards its employees in this paicular historical period; a reduction of income taxes and taxes on products and services, since these are linked to revenues and to production and consumption, all down in the same period. Environmental taxes remain stable despite the reduction in production and consumption of commodities due to increases decided upon by dierent governments in the context of their respective tax rates. In general, the signicant value of taxes paid highlights once again the impoance of the Group's tax contribution to the communities in which it operates as suppo for their stability and resilience, an element that is even more necessary to meet the new needs that have emerged due to
Covid-19.
overall to 228.3 million euros. The main reductions are in
2020 11,855.3
2020 ≠ 2019
529.5
9 in Spain16, and (iii) tax measures introduced by local authorities to suppo companies following Covid-19 in Chile; fuhermore, there were reductions in Mexico (92.5 million euros), where in 2019 one-o taxes on extraordinary transactions were paid. There were fuher reductions in income taxes in Peru, Panama and Russia (for an overall total of 68.6 million euros) mainly due to the reduction in income due to Covid-19. This was paially oset by an increase in income taxes in Italy of 284.3 million euros, due mainly to greater advance taxes paid in 2020 compared to 201917. The reduction in taxes on products and services amounts 2020 ≠ 2019 1,586.9 768.8 1,891.9 779.7 -305 | -16.1% -5.2 | -1.9% -10.9 | -1.4%
1.8 11,937.5
143.9 1,020.8
+16.5 | +11.5% -1.1 | -61.9% -7.9 | -0.8%
-1,778.2 | -13.0%
-1,698.6 | -14.2% -87.1 | -16.5%

TAXES BORNE (mil euros)
-1,778.2 | -13.0%
TAXES COLLECTED (mil euros) Income taxes Propey taxes Taxes on labour Taxes on products and services Environmental taxes In 2020, the Total Taxes Borne14 amounted to 4,244.615 million euros, down by 517.1 million euros (-10,9%) overall compared to 2019, essentially due to the reduction of income taxes and taxes on products and services, respectively 305.0 and 228.3 million euros in 2020. In contrast, an increase in environmental taxes is registered (32.3 million euros) prevalently due to the introduction of new types of such taxes and to the increase in the rates of those already existing.
Brazil (236.5 million euros) on account of the presence of tax credits due to greater payments18 made in previous years and in Spain (27.7 million euros) due to a fall in electricity and gas sales linked to the already mentioned slowdown in economic activity. This was paially oset by an increase of these taxes in Italy of 32.3 million euros, which can be explained exclusively by the signicant increase in excise duty on coal destined for electricity production, partially oset by the decrease in the consumption of coal as a consequence of the Group's decarbonization program. 827.9 795.5 2019 4,761.7 265.8 1,028.9 -517.1 | -10.9% -228.3 | -22.2% +32.3 | +4.1%
The payment of income taxes is down overall by 305.0 million euros. The most signicant reductions are in Spain (348.7 million euros) and Chile (110.3 million euros) due to the eect of (i) refunds obtained for excess taxes prepaid in previous nancial years, (ii) write-downs due mainly to the process of decarbonization not deducted scally in 201
2020 4,244.6 260.6 800.5
| 2020 ≠ 2019 | ||
|---|---|---|
| +16.5 +11.5% | -1.1 -61.9% | -7.9 -0.8% |
TAXES BORNE (mil euros)


Total Taxes Collected amount to 11,855.3 million euros, down 1,778.2 million euros (-13.0%). This reduction is due essentially to lower indirect taxes paid on account of the drop in sales and consumption of electricity caused by Covid-19. More specically, taxes are down on products and services in Italy, Brazil and Spain, respectively by 741.9, 622.1 and 316.1 million euros and environmental taxes in Spain of 103.2 million euros.
(16) As a result of the strategy of progressive abandonment of coal production, Spain in 2019 saw signicant write-downs to the value of plants, which, on the basis of the Country's tax regulations, were not deducted, but will be in subsequent years during the useful residual life of the plants.
(17) Prepaid taxes in 2020 were calculated using the historical method and are up due to the increase in taxable income between 2018 and 2019. COFINS (Contribution for the Financing of Social Security) in Brazil. 442.4
(18) These are taxes destined for the Program of Social Integration (PIS) and
0.7 10,238.9 (14) axes Borne are taxes that constitute a cost for a company.
160.4 1,012.9 (15) Taxes Borne include taxes of 1,540.5 million euros paid on the income of companies in 2020 and 1,828.1 million euros in 2019.
1 2 3 4
At a Glance Our ESG peormance Trend Topic Appendix
A representative global and concise index of the Group's tax contribution from a cash perspective is:
With regard to the corporate income tax accrued on profits/losses and in line with the best practices indicated by the OSCE19, in addition to the data for taxes paid in cash the following tables also provide the data for current taxes accounted for on an accrual basis Country by Country. Current taxes represent taxes calculated on the basis of income produced in the year following the tax rules of each country and normally deviate from taxes paid in the same year in so far as the denitive payment of the balance is made in the year following that in which they matured. The trends of the two values are destined to boardly realign over time. In 2020, current taxes at Group level were 2.15 billion euros and dier from taxes paid by 0.6 billion euros, mainly due to rebates in Spain and Chile as a consequence of excess taxes paid with respect to income produced in preceding years, as already mentioned in the paragraph on taxes borne.

A concise indicator for corporate income is represented by:
To ensure greater legibility and transparency, below are given the data of the single countries.
| UM | Italy | Spain | Russia | 2020 | 2019 2020-2019 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| mil euros |
1,742.4 | 1,059.9 | 28.7 | 29.5 | 44.4 | 2,905.0 | 2,939.2 | -34.2 | -1.2 |
| mil euros |
1,025.4 | -112.2 | 13.2 | 21.1 | 43.4 | 990.9 | 1,067.6 | -76.8 | -7.2 |
| mil euros |
1,025.4 | -136.2 | 13.2 | 21.1 | 43.4 | 966.9 | 1,036.9 | -70.0 | -6.7 |
| mil euros |
129.9 | 69.7 | 5.6 | 4.1 | - | 209.4 | 204.0 | 5.4 | 2.6 |
| mil euros |
523.2 | 137.7 | 9.9 | 1.9 | 0.2 | 672.9 | 670.1 | 2.8 | 0.4 |
| mil euros |
57.9 | 201.3 | 0.0 | 2.4 | 0.9 | 262.5 | 257.8 | 4.7 | 1.8 |
| mil euros |
6.0 | 763.3 | 0.0 | 0.0 | - | 769.3 | 739.7 | 29.6 | 4.0 |
| mil euros |
7,390.3 | 1,723.2 | 98.1 | 192.8 | 15.8 | 9,420.2 | 10,512.4 | -1,092.1 | -10.4 |
| mil euros |
2.6 | 74.4 | 0.0 | - | - | 77.1 | 74.5 | 2.6 | 3.4 |
| mil euros |
- | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| mil euros |
581.1 | 259.0 | 5.3 | 34.1 | 0.5 | 880.0 | 872.5 | 7.6 | 0.9 |
| mil euros |
6,806.5 | 973.5 | 92.9 | 158.7 | - | 8,031.6 | 9,045.9 | -1,014.3 | -11.2 |
| mil euros |
- | 416.3 | - | - | 15.3 | 431.5 | 519.4 | -87.9 | -16.9 |
| mil euros |
9,132.7 | 2,783.1 | 126.9 | 222.3 | 60.2 | 12,325.2 | 13,451.6 | -1,126.4 | -8.4 |
| UM | Italy | Spain | Russia | 2020 | % | ||||
| mil euros |
40,231.6 | 15,761.0 | 547.6 | 1,401.3 | 2,209.8 | 60,151.3 | -14.9 | ||
| mil euros |
2,088.8 | 1,032.4 | 5.5 | 4.9 | 1,531.0 | 4,662.6 | 4,101.5 | 561.1 | 13.7 |
| mil euros |
1,532.8 | 1,637.3 | 52.3 | 223.3 | 301.4 | 3,747.0 | 1,659.5 | 2,087.5 | 125.8 |
| mil euros |
1,038.0 | 120.0 | 10.7 | 23.8 | 75.2 | 1,267.8 | 1,358.7 | -90.9 | -6.7 |
| mil euros |
28,235.7 | 22,958.2 | 606.5 | 1,993.0 | 0.1 | 53,793.4 | 52,949.5 | 844.0 | 1.6 |
| no. | 29,777 | 9,659 | 1,475 | 3,248 | 20 | 44,179 | 45,464 | -1,285 | -2.8 |
| Romania Netherlands Romania Netherlands |
2019 2020-2019 70,670.3 -10,518.9 |
The Total Tax Contribution (TTC rate) index provides a concise and complete measurement of the burden for all taxes that the business has eectively paid and is calculated as a percentage of taxes borne in relation to prot before said taxes. the TTC rate went from 63.5% in 2019 to 52.3% in 2020; the dierence of 11.1% is the result both of the reduction in 2020 of Total Taxes Borne of 517.1 million euros and of the increase in the same year of EBT ante Tax Borne of 608.6 million euros, the la©er connected mainly to the eect of greater impairments due to the process of decarbonization carried out on plants in 2019.


At Group level, in FY2020 the Current Income Tax Rate determined as the ratio between corporate income taxes accrued on prots/losses (2.15 billion euros) and prot before income taxes (5.41 billion euros) is 39.7%, greater than the average rate of the member States of the OCSE (23.27%)1 .
(1) Source OECD Stat, "Table II.1. Statutory corporate income tax rate" – Combined corporate income tax rate.
39.7% Current Income Tax Rate
(19) For the purposes of Country-by-Country Repoing (BEPS Project - Action 13).
| Economic data | UM Bulgaria France Germany Greece Ireland Norway Poland Po"ugal Slovakia Turkey | United King |
dom 2020 2019 | 2020- 2019 |
% | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenues Unrelated |
mil euros |
9.2 277.7 | 223.2 111.9 | 8.9 | 0.2 | 2.5 | 973.1 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 11.1 1,618.0 1,697.3 -79.4 -4.7 | ||||||
| Revenue related cross border |
mil euros |
0.1 | 30.0 | 37.1 | 3.6 | 3.0 | 0.1 | - | 108.1 | - | 1.9 | 1.0 184.8 195.5 -10.6 -5.4 | ||||
| Prot (Loss) before income tax |
mil euros |
4.1 | -6.7 | -19.9 | 27.9 | 1.0 | -0.9 | -2.1 | 63.6 | -1.4 | -2.4 | -1.2 | 61.8 48.5 | 13.4 27.6 | ||
| Income tax accrued |
mil euros |
0.4 | 0.1 | -0.9 | 6.0 | 0.0 | - | - | -9.1 | - | 0.0 | 0.3 | -3.2 | 6.7 | -9.9 -147.5 | |
| Income tax paid mil | euros | 0.4 | 1.6 | -0.3 | 0.3 | 0.0 | - | - | 10.6 | - | 0.0 | 0.1 | 12.7 | 1.2 | 11.4 916.3 | |
| Tangible assets other than cash and cash equivalents |
mil euros |
31.4 | 23.0 | 0.7 628.8 | 1.6 | 0.1 | 0.0 | 16.5 | 0.0 | 0.1 | 9.1 711.3 688.2 | 23.1 3.4 | ||||
| Number of employees |
no. | 6 | 57 | 23 | 114 | 52 | 11 | 13 | 61 | 1 | 2 | 25 | 365 | 329 | 36 10.9 |
(1) Beyond what is shown, in some tax jurisdictions the Group is present through entities in pre-operations phase and/or in liquidation and whose overall values are immaterial. For this reason, these countries are not represented in the repo. They are: Croatia, Serbia and Sweden.
| UM | USA & Canada | Mexico | 2020 | 2019 | 2020-2019 | % | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Taxes Borne (cash accounting) |
mil euros | 43.4 | 18.9 | 62.3 | 153.0 | -90.7 | -59.3 |
| Prot taxes | mil euros | 3.5 | 15.4 | 19.0 | 111.3 | -92.4 | -83.0 |
| Income tax | mil euros | 3.5 | 15.4 | 19.0 | 111.3 | -92.4 | -83.0 |
| Prope–y taxes | mil euros | 32.9 | 0.2 | 33.1 | 26.6 | 6.5 | 24.5 |
| Employment Taxes | mil euros | 6.6 | 1.9 | 8.6 | 14.5 | -6.0 | -41.1 |
| Taxes on products and services | mil euros | 0.3 | 1.3 | 1.7 | 0.6 | 1.1 | 187.5 |
| Planet/Environmental Taxes | mil euros | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Taxes Collected (cash accounting) |
mil euros | 45.3 | 22.0 | 67.3 | 66.9 | 0.4 | 0.6 |
| Prot taxes | mil euros | - | 0.6 | 0.6 | 0.0 | 0.6 | 13,013.3 |
| Prope–y Taxes | mil euros | - | 0.7 | 0.7 | 1.8 | -1.1 | -61.9 |
| Employment Taxes | mil euros | 44.7 | 4.1 | 48.9 | 48.2 | 0.7 | 1.4 |
| Taxes on products and services | mil euros | 0.6 | 16.6 | 17.2 | 17.0 | 0.2 | 1.3 |
| Planet/Environmental Taxes | mil euros | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Total Tax Contibution (cash accounting) - TTC |
mil euros | 88.8 | 40.9 | 129.6 | 219.9 | -90.3 | -41.1 |
| Economic data | UM | USA e Canada | Messico | 2020 | 2019 | 2020-2019 | % |
| Revenues Unrelated | mil euros | 1,271.0 | 164.6 | 1,435.6 | 2,340.5 | -904.9 | -38.7 |
| Revenue related cross border | mil euros | 24.6 | 3.0 | 27.7 | 40.5 | -12.8 | -31.6 |
| Prot (Loss) before income tax | mil euros | 201.6 | -32.8 | 168.9 | 424.2 | -255.4 | -60.2 |
| Income tax accrued | mil euros | 0.0 | 8.7 | 8.7 | 14.7 | -6.0 | -40.6 |
| Tangible assets other than cash and cash equivalents |
mil euros | 7,305.7 | 1,207.0 | 8,512.7 | 13,470.2 | -4,957.6 | -36.8 |
| Number of employees | no. | 1,306 | 333 | 1,639 | 1,639 | - | 0.0 |

| UM | Brazil | Chile Colombia Argentina | Peru Panama Guatemala | Costa Rica |
2020 | 2019 | 2020- 2019 |
% | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Taxes Borne (cash accounting) |
mil | euros 639.9 | 40.8 | 364.8 | 111.5 | 98.4 | 17.7 | 2.6 | 1.7 1,277.4 1,669.5 -392.1 | -23.5 | |||
| Prot taxes | mil euros |
141.4 | 3.2 | 249.2 | 83.5 | 80.8 | 15.9 | 2.2 | 0.9 | 577.0 712.9 -135.9 | -19.1 | ||
| Income tax mil | euros | 141.4 | 3.2 | 233.1 | 79.6 | 79.2 | 15.9 | 1.9 | 0.4 | 554.6 679.8 -125.2 | -18.4 | ||
| Prope–y taxes | mil euros |
10.9 | 2.8 | 1.5 | 1.0 | 1.3 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 18.1 | 35.2 | -17.1 -48.5 | |
| Employment Taxes | mil euros |
56.3 | - | 12.7 | 15.1 | 1.9 | 0.6 | 0.2 | 0.5 | 87.3 | 95.1 | -7.8 | -8.2 |
| Taxes on products and services |
mil euros |
430.8 | 6.2 | 79.1 | 7.7 | 12.7 | 0.0 | 0.0 | - | 536.4 770.5 -234.1 -30.4 | |||
| Planet/Environmental Taxes |
mil euros |
0.4 | 28.7 | 22.3 | 4.3 | 1.7 | 1.1 | - | - | 58.5 | 55.8 | 2.7 | 4.9 |
| Taxes Collected (cash accounting) |
mil | euros 1,849.0 198.2 | 57.8 | 173.4 | 78.1 | 5.5 | 4.5 | 1.2 2,367.8 3,054.2 -686.4 | -22.5 | ||||
| Prot taxes | mil euros |
19.3 | 34.1 | 15.6 | 7.0 | 1.6 | 4.5 | 0.6 | 0.0 | 82.8 | 69.4 | 13.3 | 19.2 |
| Prope–y Taxes | mil euros |
- | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Employment Taxes | mil euros |
32.3 | 16.9 | 10.0 | 15.9 | 8.1 | 0.7 | 0.1 | 0.0 | 84.0 100.1 | -16.1 | -16.1 | |
| Taxes on products and services |
mil | euros 1,797.4 | 147.2 | 21.4 | 150.5 | 68.5 | 0.3 | 3.7 | 1.2 2,190.2 2,874.6 -684.4 | -23.8 | |||
| Planet/Environmental Taxes |
mil euros |
- | - | 10.9 | - | - | - | - | - | 10.9 | 10.0 | 0.8 | 8.1 |
| Total Tax Contibution (cash accounting) - TTC |
mil | euros 2,488.9 239.0 | 422.6 | 284.9 | 176.5 | 23.2 | 7.0 | 2.9 3,645.1 4,723.7 -1,078.6 | -22.8 | ||||
| Economic data | UM | Brazil | Chile Colombia Argentina | Peru Panama Guatemala | Costa Rica |
2020 | 2019 2020- 2019 |
% | |||||
| Revenues Unrelated | mil | euros 7,298.1 3,188.6 2,079.7 1,586.4 1,171.9 | 136.7 | 45.2 | 21.9 15,528.5 18,871.1 -3,342.6 | -17.7 | |||||||
| Revenue related cross border |
mil euros |
39.5 | 144.9 | 7.1 | 62.5 | 0.0 | 0.5 | 0.9 | 0.4 | 255.8 240.2 | 15.6 | 6.5 | |
| Prot (Loss) before income tax |
mil euros |
286.7 | -40.0 | 740.1 | 140.8 269.0 | 83.4 | 16.7 | -5.3 1,491.4 2,485.4 -993.9 -40.0 | |||||
| Income tax accrued | mil euros |
112.4 343.7 | 237.4 | 52.4 | 96.5 | 26.9 | 2.1 | 1.3 | 872.6 856.8 | 15.9 | 1.9 | ||
| Tangible assets other than cash and cash equivalents |
mil | euros 2,602.5 5,998.5 3,652.0 | 1,287.7 2,275.9 339.2 | 309.8 | 145.3 16,610.8 18,391.0 -1,780.2 | -9.7 | |||||||
| Number of employees | no. | 10,137 2,259 | 2,191 | 4,074 | 954 | 99 | 86 | 37 19,837 20,238 | -401 | -2.0 |
(1) Beyond what is shown, in some tax jurisdictions the Group is present through entities in pre-operations phase and/or in liquidation and whose overall values are immaterial. For this reason, these countries are not represented in the repo. They are: Uruguay, El Salvador.

| Economic data | UM | Kenya Marocco Zambia Australia Algeria | New Zealand |
Egypt | South | Africa 2020 2019 | 2020- 2019 |
% | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenues Unrelated | mil euros |
0.0 | 5.5 | 6.1 | 13.6 | 0.5 | 5.1 | - | 83.5 114.2 145.6 | -31.4 | -21.6 | ||
| Revenue related cross border |
mil euros |
- | - | - | 2.1 | - | 0.8 | - | 0.3 | 3.2 | 24.0 | -20.9 -86.9 | |
| Prot (Loss) before income tax |
mil euros |
-0.5 | 2.0 | -9.4 | -44.2 | -0.2 | 0.8 | -0.1 | -0.0 -51.6 | -7.9 -43.6 550.1 | |||
| Income tax accrued | mil euros |
- | 0.7 | - | -0.2 | - | 0.2 | - | - | 0.8 | 0.2 | 0.6 298.8 | |
| Income tax paid | mil euros |
- | 0.8 | - | 0.7 | - | - | - | 0.3 | 1.7 | -0.6 | 2.4 -367.6 | |
| Tangible assets other than cash and cash equivalents |
mil euros |
0.0 | 1.2 | 21.4 | 23.5 | 0.0 | 0.0 | - | 1,147.4 1,193.6 951.9 241.6 | 25.4 | |||
| Number of employees | no. | 2 | 31 | 6 | 85 | 1 | 9 | - | 166 | 300 | 262 | 38 | 14.5 |
(1) Oltre a quanto rappresentato, in alcune giurisdizioni £scali, il Gruppo è presente tramite entità in fase pre-operativa e/o in liquidazione che presentano valori complessivamente immateriali. Per questo motivo tali Paesi non sono rappresentati all'interno del repo: Arabia Saudita, Etiopia e Namibia.
| Economic data | UM | Indonesia China | Israel Singapore | Japan | India | South | Korea Taiwan 2020 2019 | 2020- 2019 |
% | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenues Unrelated | mil euros |
0.0 | 0.0 | 0.1 | -0.1 | 8.0 | 15.1 | 24.8 | 0.1 | 48.0 | 53.4 | -5.4 | -10.2 |
| Revenue related cross border |
mil euros |
- | - | 0.5 | 0.0 | 0.2 | 5.9 | 0.0 | - | 6.7 | 4.6 | 2.1 | 46.0 |
| Prot (Loss) before in come tax |
mil euros |
-0.3 -0.8 | -0.2 | -2.7 | -1.0 | 3.7 | -2.5 | -0.7 | -4.7 | -8.9 | 4.2 | -47.3 | |
| Income tax accrued | mil euros |
- | - | 0.0 | - | 0.0 | - | - | - | 0.0 | 0.1 | -0.1 -84.9 | |
| Income tax paid | mil euros |
- | - | - | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.1 | - | - | 0.1 | 0.2 | -0.0 | -16.2 |
| Tangible assets other than cash and cash equivalents |
mil euros |
0.9 | 0.1 | 0.0 | 0.2 | 0.3 | 116.0 | 1.6 | 0.2 119.4 | 78.1 | 41.3 | 52.8 | |
| Number of employees | no. | 1 | 6 | 1 | 3 | 19 | 322 | 38 | 6 | 396 | 318 | 78 | 24.5 |
In the following paragraphs, a reconciliation of data represented in the Tax Transparency Repo is made with respect to the contents of the Integrated Annual Repo 2020. This reconciliation is necessary given the dierent methods for drafting the Tax Transparency Repo – which have been changed by the OSCE rules for Country-by-Country Repoing – with respect to the principles adopted for the drafting of the Consolidated Financial Statements.
The main deviations between the data given in the Tax Transparency Repo and the data in the Integrated Annual Repo 2020 are:
b. Release of funds to prot and loss (-34 million euros);
c. Intercompany gains (-1.5 million euros);
| (iv) Other minor adjustments (2 million euros). | |
|---|---|
| ------------------------------------------------- | -- |
| Items subject to reconciliation | Tax Transparency Repo" | Consolidated Financial Statements | Di§erence to be reconciled |
|---|---|---|---|
| Third pa–y revenues | 78,896 | 64,985 | 13,911 |
| Prot (Loss) before taxes | 5,413 | 5,462 | - 50 |
| Tangible assets | 80,941 | 79,602 | 1,339 |
| Taxes paid | 1,555 | 1,575 | - 21 |
The main deviations between the data given in the Tax Transparency Repo and the data in the Integrated Annual Repo 2020 are:
trarily, by OCSE20 rules applied for the purposes of the

| Tax Transparency Repo–. Third pa"y revenues Tax Transparency Repo" |
78,895 |
|---|---|
| Commodity management without physical delivery | -4,980 |
| Financial income | -4,607 |
| Wheeling | -4,409 |
| Dividends from companies accounted for using the equity method | -70 |
| Other consolidation adjustments | 156 |
| Revenues Consolidated Financial Statements | 64,985 |
(21) They include the following specic situations listed by way of non exhaustive example only: (i) elimination of intercompany margins and gains, (ii) recognition of any negative goodwill following M&A transactions and (iii) capitalizations of nancial expenses in cases of equity injection.

| ProŽt (Loss) before income taxes Tax Transparency Repo" | 5,413 |
|---|---|
| Impairment on consolidated equity investments using the full consolidation method | 1,321 |
| Results of companies accounted for using the equity method | -332 |
| Release of funds to prot and loss | -34 |
| Intercompany gains | -1 |
| Dividends from companies accounted for using the equity method | -70 |
| Other consolidation adjustments | -836 |
| Other minor adjustments | -2 |
| Prot (Loss) before taxes Integrated Annual Repo– | -5,462 |
(22) They include the following specic situations listed by way of non exhaustive example only: (i) adjustments for adaptation of value following impairment tests and consequent adjustments of depreciation and amoization, (ii) elimination of gains from intercompany sales of assets and consequent adjustments of depreciation and amoization and (iii) accounting records for management of derivatives, at the reversal of the Cash Flow Hedge reserve for a possibly dierent qualication of the transaction between the stand-alone view of the companies and that of the Group.
(20) For the purposes of Country-by-Country Repoing (BEPS Project - Action 13).
The main deviations between the data given in the Tax Transparency Repo and the data in the Integrated Annual Repo 2020 are due to Adjustments from consolidation (1.3 billion euros)23.
| Tangible assets Tax Transparency Repo" | 80,941 |
|---|---|
| Adjustments from consolidation | 1,339 |
| Tangible assets Integrated Annual Repo– | 79,602 |
The data of income taxes paid for the purposes of the Integrated Annual Repo is determined through the method of indirect recognition, provided for under international accounting principle IAS 7.
Contrarily, the Tax Transparency Repo recognizes the data for income taxes paid on the basis of information collected from the individual companies in the dierent tax jurisdictions, consistent with the rules laid down by the OSCE for Country-by-Country Repoing.
The deviation is due to the dierent methods of recognizing the data and to the principles to which they refer24.
| Taxes paid Tax Transparency Repo" | 1,555 |
|---|---|
| Di§erence due to the di§erent methods of recognition | 21 |
| Taxes paid Integrated Annual Repo" | 1,575 |
With reference to the reconciliation between the theoretical and actual tax rate for nancial year income taxes, please refer to the analysis contained in the Integrated Annual Repo 2020.

(23) Adjustments due to the eects of (i) Purchase Price Allocations made during acquisition of controlling interests in companies, (ii) impairment of cash generating units, (iii) capitalizations of nancial expenses of xed assets realized internally, (iv) elimination of any gains during the sale of intercompany xed assets.
(24 By way of non exhaustive example only, the dierences can be related to: (i) changes during the year in the scope of consolidation, (ii) conversion of the data from a local currency to the euro in countries subject to hyperination and (iii) inclusion in the data of the Integrated Annual Repo of taxes on dividends (but excluded from the data of the Tax Transparency Repo).
The European Commission has established a specic classication system to identify environmentally sustainable economic activities, acting as an impo ant enabler to suppo sustainable investment and to implement the European Green Deal.
By providing appropriate denitions of the economic activities that can be considered environmentally sustainable, it is intended to create security and transparency for investors, protect private investors from greenwashing, help companies plan the transition, mitigate market fragmentation and, ultimately, bridge the sustainable investment gap.
The European taxonomy established six environmental objectives to identify environmentally sustainable economic activities: climate change mitigation, climate change adaptation, the sustainable use and protection of water and marine resources, the transition to a circular economy, pollution prevention and control and the protection and restoration of biodiversity and ecosystems. An economic activity is dened as environmentally sustainable if:
it makes a substantive contribution to at least one of the six environmental objectives;
it does no signicant harm (DNSH) to the other ve environmental objectives; > it meets minimum safeguards.
In July 2018, the European Commission established a Technical Expe Group (TEG) on sustainable nance to develop recommendations for technical screening criteria for economic activities that can make a substantial contribution to climate change mitigation or adaptation while avoiding signicant harm to the four other environmental objectives.
Based on the contribution of the TEG and a wide range of stakeholders and institutions, the taxonomy regulation was published in the Ocial Journal of the European Union on June 22, 2020 and entered into force on July 12, 2020.
Staing from January 2022, companies which are subject to the obligation to publish a Non-Financial Declaratio (NFD) must make public the share of their turnover, capital expenditure and ordinary operating expenditure that qualify as environmentally sustainable.
The taxonomy regulation fuher grants the European Commission the power to adopt delegated acts and acts targeted at specifying the manner in which the competent authorities and the market operators must comply with obligations pursuant to the regulations. At the time of the publication of the Sustainability Repo 2020 and the Integrated Annual Repo 2020, the European Commission has not yet published the nal version of the rst delegated act containing the technical screening criteria for the environmental objectives concerning climate mitigation and adaptation. For the other four environmental objectives, the Commission has undeaken to issue the respective delegated acts by the end of 2021, so that they can enter into force before the end of 2022. Fuhermore,

by June 2021 the European Commission will issue a delegated act to indicate to companies subject to the directive on Non-Financial Disclosure how to repo and in what measure their activities are in line with those considered sustainable from an environmental perspective.
We welcome the development of the taxonomy of the European Union, in as much as it will provide a common language to all stakeholders, with a paicular focus on the decarbonization of the European economy by 2050; we paicipate actively in the various consultation processes, supply input both directly, through ocial channels of the European Commission, and indirectly, through the dierent sector associations in which the Group paicipates. Although the European taxonomy regulation establishes an obligation for companies to declare compliance with the taxonomy staing from January 2022, Enel has decided to highlight this in the 2020 Sustainability Repo and in the 2020 Integrated Annual Repo. Fuher, during Capital Markets Day 2020, held last November, we presented our consolidated Capex, included in the 2021-2023 Strategic Plan, aligned with the taxonomy for a value between 80% and 90%, thanks to our substantial contribution to mitigation of climate changes.
In paicular, the main comments we provided in the pro-


cess of consultation, launched in December 2020, on the draft of the delegated acts concerning mitigation of and adaptation to climate changes, are as follows:
suppo for the threshold of greenhouse gas emissions in the generation of energy: we welcome the specic emissions limit of 100 gCO2eq/kWh (considering the entire life cycle) as a substantial contribution to the objective of mitigating climate changes, recommended by the TEG and based on a robust scientic base. The inclusion of the generation of energy with a carbon intensity over this limit could make it dicult for the European Union to achieve its ambition of "net zero" in 2050;
hydroelectric technology contribution to climate change mitigation objective: we believe that this technology, which ranks amongst the best pe¥orming electricity generation technologies with respect to life-cycle emissions, should be treated in the same way as the other renewable electricity generation technologies, such as wind and solar power, for which a verication of the threshold is not requested, because they are well below the specic emissions threshold of 100 gCO2eq/ kWh;
geothermal technology contribution to climate change mitigation objective: we believe that this technology should be exempt from life cycle analysis, in as much as there is sucient scientic proof to show how it has a specic emissions value well below the threshold value of 100 gCO2eq/kWh. The CO2 emi©ed by this technology
is of natural origin, it is mainly a substitute for natural emissions and does not imply the combustion of fossil
fuels;
integrated business value chain non fully represented: currently, the draft of the delegated acts does not include specic criteria for the segment for the sale of energy which, on the contrary, constitutes an impoant element of the entire value chain, and which plays a vital role in the decarbonization pathway by suppoing the electrication of consumption. We suggest to also consider the retail power activity among those with eligibility criteria by requesting retailers to apply either the criteria for the electricity generation activity or the
criteria for the electricity distribution activities.
Following the TEG recommendations, we developed a vephase process through which we analyzed the applicability of the taxonomy along the entire value chain in all the countries in which we operate.
The process exclusively concerned the objectives of climate change mitigation and adaptation since they are the only two for which the European Commission has published the draft of criteria. The nal evaluation may even undergo substantial changes on the pa of the European Commission downstream of the nalization of the criteria envisaged for 2021 and 2022.
The economic activities along the entire value chain were divided into the following three categories.
it was explicitly included in the European taxonomy regulation because it contributes substantially to climate change mitigation or adaptation;
it satises the criteria set out in the European taxonomy regulation for the two environmental objectives.

it was explicitly included in the European taxonomy regulation because it contributes substantially to climate change mitigation or adaptation;
it does not satisfy the criteria set out in the European taxonomy regulation for the two environmental objectives.
was not included in the European taxonomy regulation because it does not contribute substantially to climate change mitigation or adaptation and therefore no specic technical criteria have been developed. The European Commission believes that this type of activity may not have a signicant impact on climate change mitigation/adaptation or could be integrated into the European taxonomy regulation at a later stage.
The existence of this third category makes it impossible to achieve a business model that is fully compliant with the European taxonomy criteria, since currently some activities within the electric utilities value chain are not considered to substantially contribute to climate change mitigation.
At the time of the drafting of the present repo, the activities not covered by the taxonomy fall under the following business types: nuclear power (the European Commission has not yet made a statement regarding its admissibility), wholesale trading, sale of energy to nal customers and several business activities developed by Enel X.
Enel has adopted eective Environmental Management Systems for electricity generation and distribution activities to prevent signicant damage to the other environmental goals. An activity/asset level analysis will be carried out over the course of 2021 to verify compliance with all DNSHs
Enel has adopted a human rights due diligence process throughout the value chain to comply with the minimum safeguards. Fuher verications will be carried out in 2021, once the delegated acts have been approved

34.8% of revenues | 80.3% of Capex | 39.9% of Opex from economic activities that make a substantial contribution to climate change mitigation, based on the draft delegated acts (December 2020). More details in the "Statement on the alignment of Enel's business to taxonomy" section

(1) The European Commission has not yet made a decision as to the eligibility of nuclear power.
For the purposes of processing the following declaration it is appropriate to highlight that:
the statement was prepared exclusively following the criteria established in the draft version of the delegated act of the European taxonomy concerning the climate change mitigation goal because at the time of the preparation of the 2020 annual repos the nal version had not yet been published. Final publication could introduce impoant changes that might signicantly affect the result presented in this statement;
one change that could signicantly aect the nal result concerns the manner in which the retail business segment will nally be represented in the European taxonomy. Enel, together with other utilities, has asked the European Commission to include this business activity because, similarly to electricity distribution, it contributes substantially to climate change mitigation as an enabler of the decarbonization of other industries by promoting the electrication of energy consumption;
Enel pe¥ormed a detailed mapping of all its hydroelectric assets on the basis of the "power density" metric required in the draft delegated acts. For plants with a power density lower than 5 W/m2 , a fuher analysis was conducted to verify that the emissions (calculated over the entire life cycle) were below the specic emission limit of 100 gCO2eq/kWh. The ndings indicated that 99% of the installed hydroelectric capacity is eligible in accordance with the European taxonomy criteria for climate change mitigation only, while only 1% – for which it was not possible to conduct a timely assessment due to the lack of robust data – was ruled out on a conservative basis;
in order to maintain this conservative approach, the business activity relating to the generation of electricity from geothermal sources was considered almost entirely ineligible pending ceication by an independent third pay of compliance with the threshold for geothermal plants of 100 gCO2eq/kWh for the entirety of Group's geothermal assets;
activities relating to the infrastructure and networks business in Chile, Colombia, Peru and Argentina were consi-
dered ineligible, again adopting a conservative approach. However, during 2021 an in-depth analysis will be pe¥ormed for the distribution and transmission system, which could lead to a change in eligibility status;
the Enel X pofolio was analyzed at the Business Line and product cluster level, as it was not possible to associate all the nancial metrics required by the European taxonomy with each individual product. However, as a precaution, only the Business Lines and product clusters that fully meet the criteria were designated as eligible, excluding the others (for example "e-Home" and "distributed energy");
the statement was prepared without pe¥orming an exhaustive review of the DNSH criteria, which will be carried out once the delegated acts are approved in the second quarter of 2021. Nonetheless, Enel is condent that it can demonstrate a high level of pe¥ormance, as over the years it has implemented complete and comprehensive environmental management systems that go beyond legal requirements and are applied throughout the value chain. Additional information on Enel's environmental pe¥ormance is available in the "Environmental Sustainability" chapter of the 2020 Sustainability Repo;
the European Commission has not yet nished drafting the delegated acts for the other four environmental objectives. The la©er could strengthen the compliance of Enel's business model with the European taxonomy, considering that the current statement only covers the climate change mitigation objective;
the aggregates being analyzed refer to the "sector" level and only include items in respect of third paies. Accordingly, they do not include inter-sectoral exchange between sectors;
although not explicitly required, Enel has also pe¥ormed an assessment in terms of the ordinary gross operating prot (EBITDA), as it believes that this metric represents the eective nancial pe¥ormance of integrated utilities such as Enel. A metric that only considers revenue is strongly in uenced by business activities with a high volume of revenue (such as the wholesale market) that do not contribute propoionately to the growth of the gross operating prot like other business activities;
the statement also gives a view that excludes "not covered" activities to underscore the compliance of the Group for only the economic activities for which the European taxonomy has developed criteria and therefore the most signi cant from the point of view of the climate change mitigation objectives.
In 2020, 63.9% of the ordinary gross operating prot was generated by business activities that meet climate change mitigation criteria, compared with 64.4% in
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
RESULT EXCLUDING ACTIVITIES NOT COVERED BY TAXONOMY
30.5%
65.0 billions of euro
10.2 billions of euro
7.5 billions of euro
66.6% 2.9%
ELIGIBLE
ACTIVITIES
ADDITIONAL
OUTPUT
RESULT EXCLUDING ACTIVITIES NOT COVERED BY TAXONOMY
billions of euro
56.1%
9,2
42.0% 1.9%
88.8% 11.2%
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
ELIGIBLE
ACTIVITIES
ADDITIONAL
OUTPUT
RESULT EXCLUDING ACTIVITIES NOT COVERED BY TAXONOMY
billions of euro
37.3%
4.2
56.2% 6.5%
70.2% 29.8%
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
72.1% 27.9%
3
9
9.
%
43.2%
16.9%


Eligible Not eligible Not covered
34.8%
5
1
7.
%
13.5%
80.3%
9.5%
10.2%
Eligible Not eligible Not covered
Eligible Not eligible Not covered
ELIGIBLE ACTIVITIES
ADDITIONAL OUTPUT
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
RESULT EXCLUDING ACTIVITIES NOT COVERED BY TAXONOMY
30.5%
65.0 billions of euro
billions of euro
billions of euro
66.6% 2.9%
ELIGIBLE
ACTIVITIES
RESULT EXCLUDING ACTIVITIES NOT COVERED BY TAXONOMY
56.1%
42.0% 1.9%
| |
| | | |
| | | |
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
In 2020, 80.3% of capital expenditure was generated by business activities that meet climate change mitigation criteria, compared with 76.8% in 2019. Excluding acti-10.2 | | | | | | | | | | | | || | | | | | | | | | | || | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | || | | | | | | | 10.2% ||| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | ||
| | | |
ADDITIONAL
OUTPUT
RESULT EXCLUDING ACTIVITIES NOT COVERED BY TAXONOMY
billions of euro
are currently not covered by the European taxonomy regulation, 72.1% of revenue was eligible. Eligible Not eligible Not covered
4.2
70.2% 29.8%
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

|
| | | | | | | | |
billions of euro 31.4
72.1% 27.9%
3
43.2%
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | |
| |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | |
vities that are currently not covered by the European taxonomy regulation, 88.8% of capital expenditure was eligible. billions of euro 31.4 Eligible Not eligible Not covered
17.9 billions of euro
RESULT EXCLUDING ACTIVITIES
37.9% 60.9% 1.2%
billions of euro 13.8
83.3% 16.7%
34.8%
5
In 2020, 34.8% of revenue was generated by business activities that meet climate change mitigation criteria, compared with 30.2% in 2019. Excluding activities that ||| | | | | | | | | | | | | || | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 17.9 21
1
7.%
13.5%
63.
23.3%
12.8%
9.5%
Eligible Not eligible Not covered
Eligible Not eligible Not covered

ELIGIBLE ACTIVITIES
ADDITIONAL OUTPUT
ELIGIBLE ACTIVITIES
ADDITIONAL OUTPUT
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | |

| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
In 2020, 39.9% of ordinary operating expenditure was generated by business activities that meet climate change mitigation criteria, compared with 39.6% in |||| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | ||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
RESULT EXCLUDING ACTIVITIES NOT COVERED BY TAXONOMY
30.5%
65.0 billions of euro
7.5 billions of euro
66.6% 2.9%
ELIGIBLE
ACTIVITIES
ADDITIONAL
OUTPUT
RESULT EXCLUDING ACTIVITIES NOT COVERED BY TAXONOMY
billions of euro
37.3%
4.2
56.2% 6.5%
70.2% 29.8%
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
72.1% 27.9%
3
9
9.
%
43.2%
16.9%
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
billions of euro
RESULT EXCLUDING ACTIVITIES NOT COVERED BY TAXONOMY
37.9% 60.9% 1.2%
billions of euro 13.8
83.3% 16.7%
34.8%
5
1
7.
%
13.5% 63.9%
3.3%
2.8%
Eligible Not eligible Not covered
ELIGIBLE ACTIVITIES
ADDITIONAL OUTPUT
ELIGIBLE ACTIVITIES
ADDITIONAL OUTPUT
Eligible Not eligible Not covered
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
RESULT EXCLUDING ACTIVITIES NOT COVERED BY TAXONOMY
30.5%
65.0 billions of euro
10.2 billions of euro
66.6% 2.9%
ELIGIBLE
ACTIVITIES
ADDITIONAL
OUTPUT
RESULT EXCLUDING ACTIVITIES NOT COVERED BY TAXONOMY
56.1%
9,2
42.0% 1.9%
88.8% 11.2%
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

billions of euro 31.4
72.1% 27.9%
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
17.9 billions of euro
RESULT EXCLUDING ACTIVITIES NOT COVERED BY TAXONOMY
37.9% 60.9% 1.2%
billions of euro 13.8
83.3% 16.7%
34.8%
5
1
7.
%
13.5% 63.9%
23.3%
12.8%
80.3%
9.5%
10.2% Eligible Not eligible Not covered
ELIGIBLE ACTIVITIES
ADDITIONAL OUTPUT
ELIGIBLE ACTIVITIES
ADDITIONAL OUTPUT
Eligible Not eligible Not covered
| VALUE CHAIN |
Eligible activities (substantial contribution |
Revenue from third parties(1) | Ordinary gross operating profit (ordinary EBITDA) |
Capital expenditure - CAPEX(2) |
Ordinary operating expenditure (Opex) |
||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| to mitigation of climate changes) |
2020 | 2019 | 2020 | 2019 | 2020 | 2019 | 2020 | 2019 | |||||||||
| mil euros | % | mil euros | % | mil euros | % | mil euros | % | mil euros | % | mil euros | % | mil euros | % | mil euros | % | ||
| Power generation |
Generation from thermal and nuclear sources |
7,409 | 11.4 | 7,344 | 9.1 | 4,721 | 26.3 | 4,618 | 25.8 | 4,629 | 45.4 | 4,293 | 43.2 | 1,227 | 16.3 | 1,277 | 15.0 |
| 6,914 | 10.6 | 6,921 | 8.6 | 4,346 | 24.2 | 4,296 | 24.0 | 4,591 | 45.0 | 4,247 | 42.7 | 1,119 | 14.9 | 1,177 | 13.8 | ||
| 495 | 0.8 | 423 | 0.5 | 375 | 2.1 | 322 | 1.8 | 38 | 0.4 | 46 | 0.5 | 108 | 1.4 | 100 | 1.2 | ||
| - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | ||
| Generation from thermal and nuclear sources |
6,890 | 10.6 | 8,863 | 11.1 | 1,633 | 9.1 | 1,622 | 9.0 | 640 | 6.3 | 794 | 8.0 | 1,067 | 14.2 | 1,432 | 16.8 | |
| 3 | - | 3 | - | - | - | 2 | - | 1 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | ||
| 5,545 | 8.5 | 7,591 | 9.5 | 1,194 | 6.7 | 1,150 | 6.4 | 493 | 4.9 | 663 | 6.7 | 783 | 10.4 | 1,150 | 13.5 | ||
| 1,342 | 2.1 | 1,269 | 1.6 | 439 | 2.4 | 470 | 2.6 | 146 | 1.4 | 131 | 1.3 | 284 | 3.8 | 282 | 3.3 | ||
| Energy sales | Trading | 12,460 | 19.2 | 21,617 | 26.9 | 597 | 3.3 | -37 | -0.2 | 54 | 0.5 | 57 | 0.6 | 125 | 1.7 | 129 | 1.5 |
| (wholesale) | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
| - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | ||
| 12,460 | 19.2 | 21,617 | 26.9 | 597 | 3.3 | -37 | -0.2 | 54 | 0.5 | 57 | 0.6 | 125 | 1.7 | 129 | 1.5 | ||
| Energy | Infrastructures and Networks | 17,824 | 27.4 | 20,092 | 25.0 | 7,714 | 43.0 | 8,228 | 46.0 | 3,937 | 38.6 | 3,905 | 39.2 | 2,065 | 27.5 | 2,388 | 28.1 |
| distribution | 15,103 | 23.2 | 16,618 | 20.7 | 6,989 | 39.0 | 7,132 | 39.9 | 3,435 | 33.7 | 3,269 | 32.8 | 1,683 | 22.4 | 1,989 | 23.4 | |
| 2,720 | 4.2 | 3,474 | 4.3 | 726 | 4.0 | 1,096 | 6.1 | 502 | 4.9 | 636 | 6.4 | 381 | 5.1 | 398 | 4.7 | ||
| 1 | - | - | - | -1 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 1 | - | 1 | - | ||
| Sales | Market | 17,647 | 27.2 | 19,537 | 24.3 | 3,197 | 17.8 | 3,334 | 18.6 | 460 | 4.5 | 449 | 4.5 | 897 | 11.9 | 1,009 | 11.9 |
| (end customers) | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
| - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | ||
| 17,647 | 27.2 | 19,537 | 24.3 | 3,197 | 17.8 | 3,334 | 18.6 | 460 | 4.5 | 449 | 4.5 | 897 | 11.9 | 1,009 | 11.9 | ||
| Enel X | 970 | 1.5 | 967 | 1.2 | 161 | 0.9 | 158 | 0.9 | 303 | 3.0 | 270 | 2.7 | 296 | 3.9 | 347 | 4.1 | |
| 658 | 1.0 | 713 | 0.9 | 134 | 0.7 | 94 | 0.5 | 158 | 1.6 | 133 | 1.3 | 195 | 2.6 | 203 | 2.4 | ||
| - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | ||
| 312 | 0.5 | 254 | 0.3 | 27 | 0.2 | 64 | 0.4 | 145 | 1.4 | 137 | 1.4 | 101 | 1.3 | 144 | 1.7 | ||
| Other | Other | 1,785 - |
2.7 - |
1,907 - |
2.4 - |
-83 - |
-0.4 - |
-18 - |
-0.1 - |
174 - |
1.7 - |
179 - |
1.8 - |
1,844 - |
24.5 - |
1,924 - |
22.6 - |
| - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | ||
| 1,785 | 2.7 | 1,907 | 2.4 | -83 | -0.4 | -18 | -0.1 | 174 | 1.7 | 179 | 1.8 | 1,844 | 24.5 | 1,924 | 22.6 | ||
| TOTAL | 64,985 | 100.0 | 80,327 | 100.0 | 17,940 | 100.0 | 17,905 | 100.0 | 10,197 | 100.0 | 9,947 | 100.0 | 7,521 | 100.0 | 8,506 | 100.0 | |
| 22,678 | 34.8 | 24,255 | 30.2 | 11,469 | 63.9 | 11,524 | 64.4 | 8,185 | 80.3 | 7,649 | 76.8 | 2,997 | 39.9 | 3,369 | 39.6 | ||
| 8,760 | 13.5 | 11,488 | 14.3 | 2,295 | 12.8 | 2,568 | 14.3 | 1,033 | 10,2 | 1,345 | 13.6 | 1,272 | 16.9 | 1,648 | 19.4 | ||
| 33,547 | 51.7 | 44,584 | 55.5 | 4,176 | 23.3 | 3,813 | 21.3 | 979 | 9.5 | 953 | 9.6 | 3,252 | 43.2 | 3,489 | 41.0 | ||
(1) Revenue from third paies is "segment" revenue from non-Group counterpaies only. It therefore does not include transactions between the various segments.
(2) The gure for 2019 capital expenditure does not include 4 million euros regarding units classied as "held for sale". Eligible Not eligible Not covered

Enel Finance International NV, the Group's nancial company controlled by Enel SpA, placed three green bonds on the European market in January 2017 (1.25 billion euros), 2018 (1.25 billion euros) and 2019 (1 billion euros) for a total of 3.50 billion euros. The green bonds are for institutional investors and are guaranteed by Enel SpA. The net issuance proceeds – carried out under the medium-term bond issue program of Enel and Enel Finance International (Euro Medium-Term Notes Program - EMTN) – were used to nance eligible projects according to the "Green Bond Principles" categories, published by the ICMA (International Capital Market Association). In paicular, the proceeds were used to nance:
new projects for the development, construction and repowering of generation plants from renewable sources (green bond emission in 2017 and 2019);
new projects for the development, construction, repowering and renancing of generation plants from renewable sources as well as projects for transmission, networks and sma grids (green bond emission in 2018).
In order to facilitate the transparency and quality of the green bonds issued, the Enel Group has prepared and published specic "Green Bond Frameworks" for each year of emission, whose compliance with the reference principles has been conrmed by an external advisor, Vigeo Eiris, who issued the so-called "second pay opinion". Within the frameworks, the categories relating to eligible projects are aligned with the Sustainable Development Goals of the United Nations (UN SDG), in paicular Goals 7, 9, 11 and 131 .
The reference documents for the three emissions are available on the Enel Group's website (h©ps://www.enel.com/investors/investing/sustainable-nance/green-bonds). The Group is among the rst companies in the world having set up a "Green Bond Commi©ee" with the aim of selecting projects and monitoring the progress of their development. The repoing document hereof, published for the fouh time in 2020, meets Enel's commitment undeaken at the time of the bond issuance to repo annually on the use of proceeds, on the environmental benets deriving from the projects nanced and on fuher ESG metrics linked to these projects.
The indicators were determined in accordance with the "Green Bond Framework" (December 2016, December 2017, and November 2018) and shown in the table based on the type of project and the year of emission of the green bonds. In order to facilitate transparency and facilitate understanding of repoing over
the years, the repo also describes the following information:
2017 green bond repoing with evidence of projects relating to renewable plants. Seven plants also contribute toward the allocation of the proceeds of the 2019 green bond following new investments (Capex) that were made;
2018 green bond repoing with evidence of projects related to:
2019 green bond repoing with evidence of the projects relating to renewable plants, 10 of which were also subject to repoing for the 2017 and 2018 green bonds, as described previously.
In accordance with the "Green Bond Framework", the repo is structured as follows.
Summary table of 2017, 2018 and 2019 emissions with indication of the installed capacity and of the CO2 avoided;

projects in 2017, 2018 and 2019 respectively were used in the same years;
Table B "ESG indicators" shows the environmental benet in terms of CO2 avoided (actual or expected). In paicular, with reference to:
the quantity of CO2 avoided (both actual and expected) is determined by multiplying generation (actual or expected) by the emission factor linked to the specific thermoelectric energy generation of the country in which the plant is located (emission factors source: Enerdata - February 10, 2021 release);
in consideration of the complete allocation of the three green bonds and the volatility of production due, for example, to exceptional events such as the Covid-19 pandemic, it was decided to no longer disclose the share of production (both eective and expected) and the relative quantity of CO2 avoided a©ributable to the green bond, calculated as the share of green bond proceeds allocated to the project with respect to the total investment3;
for projects relating to generation plants from renewable sources, the cumulative value of actual generation and the relative CO2 avoided for all years of repoing of the green bond repo is also shown (with the exception of the repowering plants whose share of generation cannot be separated from the rest of the plant);
Infrastructure and Networks projects, the following indicators are also provided:
the cabling ratio, determined by the ratio between the length of the cable lines and the total length of the lines. The increase in this index over time is due to an increase in the length of the overhead and underground cable line to the detriment of bare conductors; in paicular, the main environmental benets concern the containment of plant cu©ing activities and a drastic reduction in the risk of electrocution for birds;
network automation, which corresponds to the ratio between RCP (Remote Controlled Point) and medium/ low-voltage equipment;
GRE EN BOND
(1) SDG 7 "Aordable and clean energy"; SDG 9 "Industry, innovation and infrastructure"; SDG 11 "Sustainable cities and communities"; SDG 13 "Climate action".
(2) If the same company is involved with the implementation of several projects, proceeds are allocated to the specic project based on the capacity.
(3) The eliminated columns were "2019 production a©ributable to GB (GWh)", "2019 CO2 avoided a©ributable to GB (t)", "Expected annual production a©ributable to GB (GWh)", "Expected CO2 avoided a©ributable to GB (t)".
technical network losses, mainly related to the characteristics/functions of the network. These losses are usually calculated using statistical models or benchmarks. A reduction in technical network losses results in a reduction in the energy to be generated and a consequent reduction in emissions and consumption of raw materials;
the elimination of oil equipment with PCB reduces the risk of contamination of a compound no longer in production since the 1980s and classied as ecotoxic and bioaccumulable;
Table C "Fuher ESG indicators" shows, where possible and appropriate4, as envisaged in the "second party opinion"5 the following indicators for the renewable projects:
site is repoed, in other cases (plants operating before September 30, 2020) the water consumption in operation;
The above indicators in Table C, with the exception of water consumption and plant shutdown due to environmental issues, also refer to Infrastructure and Networks projects.
Table D "Overall information" refers to the criteria, indicators, overall information and approach chosen by Enel to develop the projects nanced through the proceeds of the bond.
The data has been thoroughly calculated on the basis of the results of Enel's accounting, non-accounting and other information systems, and validated by the persons responsible in each case. The data determined through the use of estimates and related calculation method has been expressly indicated.
| GB emission | Area of investment | Allocated GB proceeds (mil euros) |
Installed capacity (MW) |
CO2 avoided (t) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2017 | Renewables | 1,238 | 3,354 | 14,528,985 |
| 2018 | 1,240 | |||
| of which new renewable projects | Renewables | 575 | 1,878 | 4,676,669 |
| of which new Infrastructure and Networks projects | I&N | 665 | n.a. | 11,700 |
| 2019 | 986 | 638 | 116,867 | |
| of which new projects identified in 2019 | Renewables | 65 | 638 | 116,867 |
| of which new Capex for 2018 projects | Renewables | 342 | n.a. | n.a. |
| of which new Capex for 2017 projects | Renewables | 579 | n.a. | n.a. |
| Investment (value in currency) |
GB proceeds | GB proceeds | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Country | Project name |
Technology | Status | Capacity (MW) |
Commercial operation date |
Currency | Value in currency (mil) |
Equivalent in euro (mil)(1) |
allocated in 2017 (mil euros) |
allocated in 2019 (mil euros) (2) |
| USA | Red Dirt | Wind | In Operation | 300 | Nov-17 | USD | 420 | 378 | 77 | - |
| USA | Thunder Ranch |
Wind | In Operation | 298 | Nov-17 | USD | 435 | 392 | 132 | - |
| USA | Hilltopper | Wind | In Operation | 185 | Nov-18 | USD | 325 | 293 | 166 | - |
| USA | Stillwater Solar II |
Solar | In Operation | 27 | May-18 | USD | 40 | 36 | 48 | - |
| USA | Woods Hill | Solar | In Operation | 25 | Dec-17 | USD | 44 | 41 | 36 | - |
| USA | Rattlesnake Creek |
Wind | In Operation | 320 | Dec-18 | USD | 430 | 387 | 204 | - |
| USA | Rock Creek | Wind | In Operation | 300 | Oct-17 | USD | 500 | 450 | 73 | - |
| BRAZIL | Horizonte MP |
Solar | In Operation | 103 | Feb-18 | USD | 110 | 99 | 43 | - |
| BRAZIL | Delfina | Wind | In Operation | 209 | Aug-17 | USD | 440 | 364 | 33 | - |
| CHILE | Cerro Pabellón |
Geothermal In Operation | 81 | Aug-17 | USD | 420 | 347 | 57 | - | |
| CHILE | Sierra Gorda | Wind | In Operation | 112 | Dec-16 | USD | 215 | 194 | 17 | - |
| PERU | Wayra | Wind | In Operation | 132 | Mar-18 | USD | 165 | 149 | 82 | - |
| PERU | Rubi | Solar | In Operation | 180 | Nov-17 | USD | 170 | 153 | 68 | - |
| ITALY | Various projects (3) |
Geothermal/ Hydroelectric |
34 | EUR | 113 | 101 | 66 | - | ||
| CANADA | Riverview | Wind | In Operation | 105 | Apr-20 | 8 | 81 | |||
| CANADA | Castel Rock Ridge 2 |
Wind | In Operation | 29 | Mar-20 | USD | 210 | 187 | 2 | 23 |
| MEXICO | Magdalena 2 | Solar | In Operation | 220 | Sep-19 | USD | 165 | 136 | 9 | 112 |
| MEXICO | Amistad II | Wind | In Operation | 100 | Dec-19 | USD | 115 | 97 | 22 | 55 |
| MEXICO | Amistad III | Wind | In Operation | 108 | Feb-20 | USD | 104 | 86 | 11 | 59 |
| MEXICO | Amistad IV | Wind | In Operation | 162 | Dec-20 | USD | 149 | 123 | 18 | 57 |
| MEXICO | Dolores | Wind | In Operation | 274 | May-20 | USD | 280 | 235 | 36 | 192 |
| PANAMA | Estrella Solar | Solar | In Operation | 8 | Aug-18 | USD | 8 | 7 | 5 | - |
| ZAMBIA | Ngonye | Solar | In Operation | 34 | Mar-19 | USD | 40 | 34 | 10 | - |
| ITALY | Various projects (4) |
Geothermal/ Hydroelectric |
8 | EUR | 43 | 36 | 14 | - | ||
| Total | 1,238 | 579 |
green bond is 1.11 USD/EUR, for projects allocated in the 2018 green bond it is 1.19 USD/EUR whereas for projects whose investment value has been updated - including those with the new Capex identied in GB 2019 - the exchange rate is 1.21. For projects where the value of the investment was updated in 2020, the

Green Bond
(4) Projects relating to renewable plants with a capacity of more than 20 MW are considered to be relevant.
(5) The indicator "Material reused/recycled after revamping" is not applicable, as the proceeds of the green bond were not used to nance revamping projects in 2017, 2018 and 2019.
(6) Sum of: injuries that as of December 31, 2020 resulted in more than 6 months of absence from work; injuries that as of December 31, 2020 are still open and are considered severe (initial prognosis >30 days); injuries categorized as "Life Changing Accidents" (LCA), regardless of the number of days of absence from work related to them.
(1) Indicative value in euros (EUR), although the investment in US dollars (USD) applies where present. The exchange rate used for projects allocated in the 2017 exchange rate is equal to 1.12.
(2) Additional proceeds were allocated for some renewable projects that were already identied in the 2017 and 2018 green bond, for which new capitalized costs emerged.
(3) Aggregate data related to 24 small sized Italian projects. The technologies involved are geothermal and hydroelectric. With respect to 2020 - the year of publication of the 2019 Green Bond Repo - "Mini Biomass (7 projects)" left the scope due to decommissioning activities and "Stre©ara DMV" left as it is waiting for reauthorization. The total amount allocated, approximately 3 million euros, has been included in Amistad IV.
(4) Aggregate data related to 8 small sized Italian projects. The technologies involved are geothermal and hydroelectric.


(1) For projects entered into operation by September 30, 2020, the actual production data is repoed and consequently the amount of CO2 avoided.
(2) For projects entered into operation after September 30, 2020 or which have not yet entered into operation, the expected annual production data and the expected amount of CO2 avoided are repoed.
(1) For plant entered into operation by September 30, 2020 the figures refer to water consumption for industrial use related to operation phase.
(2) For plant not yet entered into operation by September 30, 2020 the figures refer to water consumption for industrial use related to under construction phase.
(3) Aggregate data related to 24 small sized Italian projects. The technologies involved are geothermal and hydroelectric.
(4) Aggregate data related to 8 small sized Italian projects. The technologies involved are geothermal and hydroelectric.
Green Bond 2017

| Country | Project name | 2020 production (GWh) (1) |
2020 CO2 avoided (t) |
2017-2020 production (GWh) |
2017-2020 CO2 avoided (t) |
Expected annual production (GWh) (2) |
Expected CO2 avoided (t) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| USA | Red Dirt | 983 | 608,249 | 3,077 | 2,007,488 | - | - |
| USA | Thunder Ranch | 1,124 | 695,600 | 3,405 | 2,219,231 | - | - |
| USA | Hilltopper | 542 | 335,186 | 1,145 | 733,529 | - | - |
| USA | Stillwater Solar II | 9 | 5,757 | 65 | 42,438 | - | - |
| USA | Woods Hill | 31 | 19,208 | 78 | 50,290 | - | - |
| USA | Rattlesnake Creek | 1,206 | 745,730 | 2,237 | 1,426,317 | - | - |
| USA | Rock Creek | 1,107 | 684,543 | 3,312 | 2,157,975 | - | - |
| BRAZIL | Horizonte MP | 163 | 93,593 | 513 | 290,254 | - | - |
| BRAZIL | Delfina | 814 | 466,150 | 2,799 | 1,568,920 | - | - |
| CHILE | Cerro Pabellón | 216 | 162,079 | 683 | 518,095 | - | - |
| CHILE | Sierra Gorda | 351 | 262,863 | 1,366 | 1,035,731 | - | - |
| PERU | Wayra | 617 | 285,077 | 1,669 | 802,639 | - | - |
| PERU | Rubi | 435 | 200,925 | 1,279 | 616,696 | - | - |
| ITALY | Various projects (3) | 15 | 6,937 | 393 | 194,149 | - | - |
| CANADA | Riverview | 236 | 158,350 | 236 | 158,350 | - | - |
| CANADA | Castel Rock Ridge 2 |
79 | 53,038 | 79 | 53,038 | - | - |
| MEXICO | Magdalena 2 | 443 | 254,270 | 489 | 279,921 | - | - |
| MEXICO | Amistad II | - | - | - | - | 427 | 245,055 |
| MEXICO | Amistad III | - | - | - | - | 405 | 232,318 |
| MEXICO | Amistad IV | - | - | - | - | 620 | 355,684 |
| MEXICO | Dolores | 451 | 258,973 | 451 | 258,973 | - | - |
| PANAMA | Estrella Solar | 10 | 6,836 | 22 | 14,002 | - | - |
| ZAMBIA | Ngonye | 58 | 60,026 | 93 | 94,928 | - | - |
ITALY Various projects (4) - 55 12 6,021 - -
| Country | Project name | Water consumption (m3) |
Actions to protect/restore biodiversity (no.) |
Plant shutdown or site stop due to environmental issues (no.) |
Injuries (fatal and "High Consequence") (no.) |
Social actions (no.) | Beneficiaries of social projects (no.) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| USA | Red Dirt | - | - | - | - | 2 | 2,322 |
| USA | Thunder Ranch | - | 1 | - | - | 5 | 17,253 |
| USA | Hilltopper | - | 1 | - | - | 3 | 33,633 |
| USA | Stillwater Solar II | - | - | - | - | 2 | 1,966 |
| USA | Woods Hill | - | - | - | - | 1 | 1,424 |
| USA | Rattlesnake Creek | - | - | - | - | 3 | 1,742 |
| USA | Rock Creek | - | 1 | - | - | 1 | 1,280 |
| BRAZIL | Horizonte MP | 270 (1) | 2 | - | - | 2 | 199 |
| BRAZIL | Delfina | - | 8 | - | - | - | - |
| CHILE | Cerro Pabellón | 2,435 (1) | 4 | - | - | 3 | 76 |
| CHILE | Sierra Gorda | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| PERU | Wayra | - | 1 | - | - | 7 | 2,007 |
| PERU | Rubi | - | - | - | - | 8 | 3,267 |
| ITALY | Various projects (3) | - | - | - | - | 3 | 41 |
| CANADA | Riverview | - | 1 | - | - | 1 | - |
| CANADA | Castel Rock Ridge 2 |
- | 1 | - | - | - | - |
| MEXICO | Magdalena 2 | - | - | - | - | 1 | 1,206 |
| MEXICO | Amistad II | 150 (2) | 2 | - | - | 1 | 1,416 |
| MEXICO | Amistad III | 1,658 (2) | 3 | - | - | 4 | 1,431 |
| MEXICO | Amistad IV | 3,605 (2) | 3 | - | - | 6 | 2,170 |
| MEXICO | Dolores | - | 3 | - | - | 2 | 99 |
| PANAMA | Estrella Solar | 30 (1) | - | - | - | - | - |
| ZAMBIA | Ngonye | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| ITALY | Various projects (4) | - | - | - | - | 3 | 863 |
Table B - ESG indicators Renewable projects Table C - Further ESG indicators Renewable projects
(1) For projects entered into operation by September 30, 2020, the actual production data is repoed and consequently the amount of CO2 avoided.
(2) For projects entered into operation after September 30, 2020 or which have not yet entered into operation, the expected annual production data and the expected amount of CO2 avoided are repoed.
(3) The share of production for only repowering cannot be separated from the rest of the plant because it is not possible to precisely determine the share of energy fed to the network only due to the increase in power.
Renewable projects + Refinancing
(1) Indicative value in euros (EUR), although the investment in US dollars (USD) applies where present. The exchange rate used for projects allocated in the 2017 green bond is 1.11 USD/EUR, for projects allocated in the 2018 green bond it is 1.19 USD/EUR whereas for projects whose investment value has been updated - including those with the new Capex identied in GB 2019 - the exchange rate is 1.21. For projects where the value of the investment was updated in 2020, the exchange rate is equal to 1.12.
(2) Additional proceeds were allocated for some renewable projects that were already identied in the 2017 and 2018 green bond, for which new capitalized costs emerged.

(2) For plant not yet entered into operation by September 30, 2020 the gures refer to water consumption for industrial use related to under construction phase.
| Investment (value in currency) |
GB proceeds | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Country | Project name |
Technology | Status | Capacity (MW) |
Commercial operation date |
Currency | Value in currency (mil) |
Equivalent in euro (mil)(1) |
allocated in 2018 (mil euros) |
allocated in 2019 (mil euros) (2) |
|
| USA | Diamond Vista |
Wind | In Operation | 300 | Dec-18 | USD | 400 | 336 | 100 | - | |
| USA | Fenner Repowering |
Wind | In Operation | 29 | Dec-18 | USD | 29 | 24 | 21 | - | |
| USA | High Lonesome I+II |
Wind | In Operation | 501 | Dec-19 | USD | 720 | 595 | 81 | 75 | |
| USA | Roadrunner | Solar | In Operation | 497 | Jun-20 | USD | 436 | 366 | 30 | 141 | |
| GERMANY | Cremzow | Other | In Operation | 22 | Feb-19 | USD | 17 | 17 | 9 | - | |
| GREECE | Kafireas | Wind | In Operation | 154 | Oct-19 | USD | 300 | 300 | 64 | 126 | |
| COLOMBIA | El Paso | Solar | In Operation | 86 | Oct-19 | USD | 70 | 59 | 54 | - | |
| USA | Aurora USA | Solar | In Operation | 150 | Jun-17 | USD | 290 | 244 | 181 | - | |
| USA | Little Elk | Wind | In Operation | 74 | Dec-15 | USD | 130 | 107 | 5 | - | |
| USA | Chisholm View II |
Wind | In Operation | 65 | Dec-16 | USD | 90 | 76 | 29 | - | |
| Total | 575 | 342 |
| Country | Project name | 2020 production (GWh) (1) |
2020 CO2 avoided (t) |
2018-2020 production (GWh) |
2018-2020 CO2 avoided (t) |
Expected annual production (GWh) (2) |
Expected CO2 avoided (t) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| USA | Diamond Vista | 1,162 | 718,730 | 2,265 | 1,446,539 | - | - |
| USA | Fenner Repowering (3) |
88 | 54,398 | 88 | 54,398 | - | - |
| USA | High Lonesome I+II |
1,351 | 835,418 | 1,351 | 835,418 | - | - |
| USA | Roadrunner | 854 | 528,346 | 854 | 528,346 | - | - |
| GERMANY | Cremzow | n.a. | n.a. | n.a. | n.a. | n.a. | n.a. |
| GREECE | Kafireas | 415 | 291,093 | 415 | 291,093 | - | - |
| COLOMBIA | El Paso | 136 | 98,589 | 136 | 98,589 | - | - |
| USA | Aurora | 184 | 113,513 | 545 | 354,624 | - | - |
| USA | Little Elk | 311 | 192,307 | 981 | 639,845 | - | - |
| USA | Chisholm View II | 214 | 132,157 | 656 | 427,816 | - | - |
| Country | Project name | Water consumption (m3) |
Actions to protect/restore biodiversity (no.) |
Plant shutdown or site stop due to environmental issues (no.) |
Injuries (fatal and "High Consequence") (no.) |
Social actions (no.) | Beneficiaries of social projects (no.) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| USA | Diamond Vista | - | - | - | - | 3 | 1,194 |
| USA | Fenner Repowering |
- | - | - | - | 2 | 10,002 |
| USA | High Lonesome I+II |
- | 1 | - | - | 2 | 2,034 |
| USA | Roadrunner | - | - | - | - | 1 | 3,335 |
| GERMANY | Cremzow | - | - | - | - | 1 | 3,335 |
| GREECE | Kafireas | - | 1 | - | - | 4 | 6,286 |
| COLOMBIA | El Paso | - | - | - | - | 3 | 872 |
| USA | Aurora USA | - | 1 | - | - | 3 | 4,465 |
| USA | Little Elk | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| USA | Chisholm View II | - | - | - | - | 1 | 3,499 |
| Country | Project cluster | Cluster | Status | Investments in currency (mil) |
Green bond proceeds allocated to the project in 2018 (mil euros) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ITALY | Smart Meter | Asset Development | (1) | n.a. | 46 |
| ITALY | Smart Grid | Asset Development | (2) | n.a. | 21 |
| ITALY | Quality&Efficiency | Asset Development | (2) | n.a. | 305 |
| ITALY | Other ICT Investment | Asset Development | (2) | n.a. | 52 |
| Total Asset Development | 824 | 424 | |||
| ITALY | Maintenance | Asset Management | (2) | n.a. | 242 |
| Total Asset Management | 452 | 242 | |||
| Total Asset Development and Asset Management Country Italy | 1,276 | 666 |
n.a. not applicable
(1) As at December 31, 2018 the nal gures of the project consisted of approximately 420 million euros of meters and concentrators entered into operation in the same month as the installation and about 26 million euros for the central remote management system and related software.
(2) The nal gures are composed of a very large number of interventions that include activities staed in previous years and concluded in the current year, activities staed in the current year and concluded in the same year and activities staed in the year and not yet completed at December 31, 2018.
| Country | Injuries (fatal and "High Consequence") (no.) |
Social actions (no.) | Beneficiaries of social projects (no.) |
Biodiversity projects (no.) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ITALY | 1 | 207 | 184.209 | 54 |
| Italy | Cabling (%) | Network automation (%) |
Oil equipment with PCB removed (no.) |
End users with active smart meter (mil) |
Renewable production units connected to network (no.) |
New "users" connected to network (no.) |
Technical network losses (%) |
CO2 avoided (t) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total Asset Development | n.a. | n.a. | n.a. | 32,818 | 57,086 | 148,352 | n.a. | |
| Total Asset Management | 75.5 | 37 | 215 | n.a. | n.a. | n.a. | 4.4 | 11,700 |
n.a. not applicable
(1) Staing in 2017, a campaign has been staed for replacing rst generation sma meters with second generation meters, therefore the replacement does not involve an increase in the number of repoed sma meters.
| Project name (1) Technology | Status | Capacity (MW) |
Com mercial operation date |
Investment (value in currency) |
GB proceeds | GB proceeds | GB proceeds | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Country | Currency | Value in currency (mil) |
Equivalent in euro (mil) (2) |
allocated in 2017 (mil euros) |
allocated in 2018 (mil euros) |
allocated in 2019 (mil euros) (3) |
|||||
| USA | Whitney Hill | Wind | In Operation | 66 | Dec-19 | USD | 281 | 232 | - | - | 10 |
| USA | Aurora Wind | Wind | In Operation | 299 | Dec-20 | USD | 450 | 401 | - | - | 10 |
| USA | Cimarron Bend 3 phase I |
Wind | In Operation | 199 | Dec-20 | USD | 114 | 94 | - | - | 4 |
| AUSTRALIA | Cohuna | Solar | In Operation | 34 | Jun-20 | USD | 42 | 37 | - | - | 31 |
| ITALY | Various projects (4) |
Hydroelectric | 40 | EUR | 55 | 55 | - | - | 10 | ||
| CANADA | Riverview | Wind | In Operation | 105 | Apr-20 | USD | 8 | - | 81 | ||
| CANADA | Castel Rock Ridge 2 |
Wind | In Operation | 29 | Mar-20 | USD | 210 | 187 | 2 | - | 23 |
| MEXICO | Magdalena 2 | Solar | In Operation | 220 | Sep-19 | USD | 165 | 136 | 9 | - | 112 |
| MEXICO | Amistad II | Wind | In Operation | 100 | Dec-19 | USD | 115 | 97 | 22 | - | 55 |
| MEXICO | Amistad III | Wind | In Operation | 108 | Feb-20 | USD | 104 | 86 | 11 | - | 59 |
| MEXICO | Amistad IV | Wind | In Operation | 162 | Dec-20 | USD | 149 | 123 | 18 | - | 57 |
| MEXICO | Dolores | Wind | In Operation | 274 | May-20 | USD | 280 | 235 | 36 | - | 192 |
| USA | High Lonesome I+II |
Wind | In Operation | 501 | Dec-19 | USD | 720 | 595 | - | 81 | 75 |
| USA | Roadrunner | Solar | In Operation | 497 | Jun-20 | USD | 436 | 366 | - | 30 | 141 |
| GREECE | Kafireas | Wind | In Operation | 154 | Oct-19 | USD | 300 | 300 | - | 64 | 126 |
| Totale | 986 |
(1) With respect to 2020 - the year of publication of the 2019 Green Bond Repo - the Girgarre project (Australia) left the scope because it is waiting for reauthorization. The allocated amount, equal to approximately 7 million euros, has been included in Amistad IV."
(2) Indicative value in euros (EUR), although the investment in US dollars (USD) applies where present. The exchange rate used for projects allocated in the 2017 green bond is 1.11 USD/EUR, for projects allocated in the 2018 green bond it is 1.19 USD/EUR whereas for projects whose investment value has been updated - including those with the new Capex identied in GB 2019 - the exchange rate is 1.21. For projects where the value of the investment was updated in 2020, the
exchange rate is equal to 1.12.
(3) Additional proceeds were allocated for some renewable projects that were already identied in the 2017 and 2018 Green Bond, for which new capitalized costs
emerged.
(4) Aggregate data related to 8 small sized Italian projects. The concerned technology is hydroelectric.
| Country | Project name (1) | 2020 production (GWh) (2) |
2020 CO2 avoided |
2019-2020 production (GWh) |
2019-2020 CO2 avoided (t) |
Expected annual production (GWh) (3) |
Expected CO2 avoided (t) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| USA | Whitney Hill | 189 | 116,867 | 189 | 116,867 | - | - |
| USA | Aurora Wind | - | - | - | - | 1,317 | 814,949 |
| USA | Cimarron Bend 3 phase I |
- | - | - | - | 929 | 574,629 |
| AUSTRALIA | Cohuna | - | - | - | - | 79 | 61,776 |
| ITALY | Various projects (4) | n.a. | n.a. | n.a. | n.a. | n.a. | n.a. |
| n.a. not applicable | ||
|---|---|---|
(1) For projects for which new Capex were allocated in 2019, in addition to what was allocated in the 2017 and 2018 green bond, for the ESG indicators refer to the
2017 and 2018 tables.
avoided.



No violation in terms of human rights regarding projects nanced with GB proceeds.
The risk analysis conducted on a country level in the Group's areas of presence highlighted an average risk perceived as "to be monitored" and "high priority"1 . Group human rights practices and policies were subsequently assessed as "robust"2. However, specic action plans have been developed for each country of presence as well as a centrally managed improvement plan to harmonize and integrate processes and policies dened at the global level and applied at the local level.
No violation in terms of worker rights regarding projects nanced with GB proceeds.
The risk analysis conducted on a country level in the in the Group's areas of presence highlighted an average risk perceived as "to be monitored"1 . Group human rights practices and policies were subsequently assessed as "robust"2. However, specic action plans have been developed for each country of presence as well as a centrally managed improvement plan to harmonize and integrate processes and policies dened at the global level and applied at the local level.
| CRITERION | INDICATOR | GB 2020 DATA/APPROACH |
|---|---|---|
| Respect for human rights standards and prevention of breaches |
Number and description of the repo–s identied through the Enel monitoring system |
|
| Results of risk analysis on human rights at country level |
||
| Respect for labor rights |
Number and description of the repo–s identied through the Enel monitoring system |
|
| Results of risk analysis on human rights at country level |
||
| Working conditions (employment relationships, training, health and safety conditions, respect for working hours) |
Number of injuries (fatal and "High Consequence") |
|
| Integration of environmental and social factors into the supply chain - Responsible purchasing |
Ethical clauses in contracts with suppliers |
|
| Business ethics (prevention of corruption and money laundering, fraud, anticompetitive practices) |
Number and description of the repo–s identied through the Enel monitoring system |
|
| Audit and internal control |
% of area/country processes covered by internal audit activities |
No repoing on renewable plant projects nanced with with GB proceeds and 1 "High Consequence" injury in Infrastructure and Networks in Italy (only Enel people).
Through the General Contract Conditions, Enel requires its contractors and subcontractors, among other things, to comply with the ten principles of the United Nations Global Compact, respect for and protection of internationally recognized human rights, as well as respect for ethical and social obligations regarding the ght against child labor and protection of women, equal treatment, prohibition of discrimination, freedom of association, association and representation, forced labor, safety and environmental protection, sanitary conditions and also regulatory conditions, retribution, contributions, insurance and tax.
One violation found within the framework of Infrastructure and Networks in Italy regarding projects nanced with GB proceeds.
The average annual coverage level of the processes through internal audit activities is equal to 51% for Renewables and 76% for Infrastructure and Networks in Italy.
(1) Average perceived risk: average of perceived risk levels identied in the countries being analyzed. Reference scale of risks: 1. High risk; 2. High priority risk; 3. Risk

| Country | Project name (1) | Water consumption (m3) |
Actions to protect/restore biodiversity (no.) |
Plant shutdown or site stop due to environmental issues (no.) |
Injuries (fatal and "High Consequence") (no.) |
Social actions (no.) | Beneficiaries of social projects (no.) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| USA | Whitney Hill | - | 1 | - | - | - | - |
| USA | Aurora Wind | 16,758 (2) | 1 | - | - | 3 | 1,627 |
| USA | Cimarron Bend 3 phase I |
3,398 (2) | - | - | - | 1 | 684 |
| AUSTRALIA | Cohuna | 5,730 (2) | - | - | - | 5 | 1,024 |
| ITALY | Various projects (3) | 100 (2) | - | - | - | - | - |
(1) For plant entered into operation by September 30, 2020 the gures refer to water consumption for industrial use related to operation phase.

Renewable projects
KPMG S.p.A. Revisione e organizzazione contabile Via Curtatone, 3 00185 ROMA RM Telefono +39 06 80961.1 Email it [email protected] PEC [email protected]
KPMG S.p.A. è una società per azioni di diritto italiano e fa parte del network KPMG di entità indipendenti affiliate a KPMG International Limited, società di diritto inglese.
Ancona Bari Bergamo Bologna Bolzano Brescia Catania Como Firenze Genova Lecce Milano Napoli Novara Padova Palermo Parma Perugia Pescara Roma Torino Treviso Trieste Varese Verona
Società per azioni Capitale sociale Euro 10.415.500,00 i.v. Registro Imprese Milano Monza Brianza Lodi e Codice Fiscale N. 00709600159 R.E.A. Milano N. 512867 Partita IVA 00709600159 VAT number IT00709600159 Sede legale: Via Vittor Pisani, 25 20124 Milano MI ITALIA


(Translation from the Italian original which remains the definitive version)
To the board of directors of Enel S.p.A.
We have been engaged to perform a limited assurance engagement on the 2020 Green Bond Report (the "report ") of Enel S.p.A. (the "company "), which comprises the summary table of emissions, table A "Financial indicators ", table B "ESG indicators ", table C "Further ESG indicators ", table D "Overall information" and notes thereto and has been prepared on the basis of the Enel Group 's green bond framework (the "framework "). This report is included in the Enel Group 's 2020 sustainability report.
The directors are responsible for the preparation of the report in accordance with the framework described in the "Introduction and reporting criteria" note to the report. They are also responsible for such internal control as they determine is necessary to enable the preparation of a report that is free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error. Moreover, the directors are responsible for identifying the content of the report, selecting and applying policies and making judgements and estimates that are reasonable in the circumstances.
We are independent in compliance with the independence and all other ethical requirements of the International Code of Ethics for Professional Accountants (including International Independence Standards, the IESBA Code) issued by the International Ethics Standards Board for Accountants, which is founded on fundamental principles of integrity, objectivity, professional competence and due care, confidentiality and professional behaviour.
Our company applies International Standard on Quality Control 1 (ISQC Italia 1) and, accordingly, maintains a system of quality control including documented policies and procedures regarding compliance with ethical requirements, professional standards and applicable legal and regulatory requirements.


Enel Group Independent auditors ' report 31 December 2020
2
Auditors' responsibility
Our responsibility is to express a conclusion, based on the procedures performed, on the report. We carried out our work in accordance with the criteria established by "International Standard on Assurance Engagements 2020 (revised) - Assurance Engagements other than Audits or Reviews of Historical Financial Information" ("ISAE 3000 revised "), issued by the International Auditing and Assurance Standards Board applicable to limited assurance engagements. This standard requires that we plan and perform the engagement to obtain limited assurance about whether the NFS is free from material misstatement. A limited assurance engagement is less in scope than a reasonable assurance engagement carried out in accordance with ISAE 3000 revised, and consequently does not enable us to obtain assurance that we would become aware of all significant matters and events that might be identified in a reasonable assurance engagement.
The procedures we performed on the report are based on our professional judgement and include inquiries, primarily of the company 's personnel responsible for the preparation of the information presented in the report, documental analyses, recalculations and other evidence gathering procedures, as appropriate.
Specifically, we carried out the following main procedures:
2 interviewing relevant staff at corporate and business level responsible for the 2020
3 understanding the processes underlying the generation, recording and management of the qualitative and quantitative information disclosed in the report;
's management personnel to obtain information on the processes and procedures used to gather, combine, process and transmit data and information to the office that prepares the report.
-based documental analysis and analytical procedures to check
Based on the procedures performed, nothing has come to our attention that causes us to believe that the 2020 Green Bond Report of Enel S.p.A. has been not prepared, in all material respects, in accordance with the framework described in the "Introduction and reporting criteria" note to the report.
Other auditors performed a limited assurance engagement on the 2017, 2018 and 2019 figures presented in the 2020 Green Bond Report and expressed their unqualified conclusions on 10 May 2018, 7 May 2019 and 8 April 2020, respectively.
Rome, 19 April 2021
KPMG S.p.A.
(signed on the original)
Marco Maffei Director of Audit



TOPIC VIEW


1 2 3 4 At a Glance Our ESG peormance Trend Topic Appendix
Since 2003 Enel has been publishing a Sustainability Repo each year, at the same time as the Group Consolidated Annual Repo.
In compliance with the requirements of Italian Legislative Decree 254 of December 30, 2016, "Implementation of Directive 2014/95/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of October 22, 2014, amending Directive 2013/34/EU as regards disclosure of non-nancial and diversity information by ceain large companies and groups", Enel has been publishing a Consolidated Non-Financial Statement (NFS) since 2017. The Sustainability Repo will constitute Enel's NFS with eect from the 2019 nancial year. Accordingly, from that nancial year on, the NFS is no longer published as a separate document. This Repo of the Enel Group at December 31, 2020 was therefore drawn up in compliance with Legislative Decree 254/16 and the 2019 Budget Act and it is a separate document with respect to the Repo on Operations. The document is published in the "Investors" section of Enel's website (www.enel.com).
The 2020 Sustainability Repo is addressed to the Enel Group's stakeholders and is designed to present the actions taken in pursuit of the Group's sustainability goals and thus to respond to the legitimate expectations of all stakeholders. The document structure has been revised compared to previous years, with the inclusion in the appendix of reconciliation statements that consider the indicators proposed by the white paper "Toward Common Metrics and Consistent Repoing of Sustainable Value Creation", issued by the World Economic Forum (WEF), and the indicators of the "SASB", which gives an overview of the main indicators required by the aforementioned standard in relation to Enel's core business sector: "Electric Utilities & Power Generators".
To the extent necessary to ensure an understanding of the Company's activities, pe¥ormance, results and impact, this document covers environmental, social, labor, human rights and active and passive anti-corruption topics that are material to Enel, in view of the Company's activities and characteristics, according to the process described below (see the section "The 2020 materiality analysis"). The following table shows the areas required by Legislative Decree 254/16, specifying the document chapter in which they are discussed.
The Sustainability Repo was prepared in compliance with the Sustainability Repoing Standards set down by GRI in 2016 – in accordance with the Core option – and also considering the Electric Utilities Disclosure supplement dedicated to the sector issued in 2013, again by GRI and still applicable today; this document was also prepared in consideration of the following more recently issued GRI standards:
GRI 403 Occupational Health and Safety (applied from 2018);
GRI 303 Water and eÓuents (applied from 2018);
GRI 207 Tax (applied from 2020);
GRI 306 Waste (applied from 2020).
Moreover, for comprehensive repoing in relation to the material topics identied following the materiality analysis, the directors deemed it necessary to include several additional disclosures, as more fully specied in this document. In compliance with standard GRI 101, the disclosures in question were subjected to the same technical rigor required by the repoing standard adopted.

The repoing standards adopted, as described above, comply with the disclosure obligations pursuant to Italian Legislative Decree 254/16 a. 1 le©er "f" and a. 3, par. 3, which the directors decided to adopt organically in order to fully represent the social and environmental topics – in compliance with the mentioned decree – of signicance for the Enel Group in consideration of the Group structure, the specic business sectors, and the reference geographical areas.
Fuhermore, the appendix to the Sustainability Repo contains specic tables of reconciliation with indicators proposed by the WEF white paper "Toward Common Metrics and Consistent Repoing of Sustainable Value Creation" and, staing from 2020, with the indicators proposed by the Sustainability Accounting Standards Board (SASB – in relation to Enel's core business area in the Electric Utilities & Power Generators Sector). The 2020 Sustainability Repo also complies with the qualitative indicators of the Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures (TCFD) and of the UN Guiding Principles Repoing Framework.
The Sustainability Repo is pa of the Enel corporate repoing system, and the information it provides is more detailed than and supplementary to the annexed documents cross referenced in the Repo.
101 102-1 102-3 102-5 102-40 102-42 102-43 102-45 102-46 102-47 102-48 102-49 102-50 102-51 102-52 102-53 102-54 102-55 102-56
| Topic of the Repo"/ Legislative Decree 254/16 |
Issue of the materiality analysis |
Repo" chapter | Risks | Policies and management model |
Activities and results |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Environment | Decarbonization of the energy mix |
Net-zero ambition | "Net-zero ambition" chapter |
"Net-zero ambition" chapter |
"Net-zero ambition" chapter |
| Environmental management |
Environmental sustainability |
"Sound governance" chapter |
"Environmental sustainability" chapter |
"Environmental sustainability" chapter |
|
| Social | Engaging local communities |
Local and global communities |
"Sound governance" chapter |
"Local and global communities" chapter |
"Local and global communities" chapter |
| Sustainable supply chain |
Sustainable supply chain |
"Sound governance" chapter |
"Sustainable supply chain" chapter |
"Sustainable supply chain" chapter |
|
| Employment and labor-related |
People management, development and motivation |
Our people | "Sound governance" chapter |
"Our people" chapter "Our people" chapter | |
| Occupational health and safety |
Occupational health and safety |
"Sound governance" chapter |
"Occupational health and safety" chapter |
"Occupational health and safety" chapter |
|
| Human rights | Sound governance and fair corporate conduct |
Sound governance | "Sound governance" chapter |
"Sound governance" chapter |
"Sound governance" chapter |
| People management, development and motivation |
|||||
| Engaging local communities |
|||||
| Fight against corruption |
Sound governance and fair corporate conduct |
Sound governance | "Sound governance" chapter |
"Sound governance" chapter |
"Sound governance" chapter |
Information and in-depth analyses on the issues and indicators presented in this Repo can be requested from:
Viale Regina Margherita, 137 00198 Rome - Italy
Tel +39 06 8305 1 E-mail: [email protected] Web: h©ps//www.enel.com/it/investors1
Enel SpA
| Innovability® Function |
|---|
| (Innovation and Sustainability) |
| Sustainability Planning |
| and Pe¥ormance Management |
| and Human Rights |
The non-nancial information to be presented within the various corporate repoing system documents is selected based on the materiality analysis results and considering the approach set down in "Repoing on enterprise value", released in December 2020 by the main reference international organizations (CDP, CDSB, GRI and SASB). Specically, the process of dening the contents of the Sustainability Repo is based on materiality principles, stakeholder inclusivity, sustainability context, and completeness of data and
information.
Enel provides concise information on its sustainability performance in specic sections of the Sustainability Repo (see "At a Glance" and "Our ESG pe¥ormances"); these chapters contain descriptions also of the goals and associated progress referred to the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), in order to provide full disclosure of all relevant information in the repoing period, together with reliable estimates for the future. The quality of information repoed is assured by proceeding in compliance with the principles of balance, comparability, accuracy, timeliness, clarity, and veriability.
This Sustainability Repo is also compliant with the principles of inclusivity, materiality and responsiveness set out in AA1000APS (AccountAbility Principles Standard) issued in 2018 by AccountAbility, an international applied research institution focusing on sustainability issues. With regard to the materiality principle, in paicular, the depth in which the various subjects are discussed in the Repo has been determined according to their incidence in relation to the Group's goals and strategies and their relevance for stakeholders, established by means of a structured materiality analysis process.
Finally, the main UN SDGs are referenced in the various chapters, in accordance with the instructions in "Linking the SDGs and the GRI standards" published by GRI in January 2021, and the SDGs Compass, the guide, published in November 2015, developed by GRI, UN Global Compact and the World Business Council for Sustainable Development (WBCSD) to help companies align their strategies with the SDGs and measure and manage their contribution to the goals.
102-46 103-1
In line with the provisions of AccountAbility standard AA1000APS (2018) and with the principles of inclusivity, materiality, responsiveness, and impact, Enel has dened a materiality analysis process made up of ve main phases, as shown in the following cha.
Data collection, aggregation and processing of information are managed using a dedicated IT system in order to share best stakeholder engagement and monitoring practices and allow a level of coverage consistent with the Company's organizational model. The system allows specific views to be obtained, not only at the level of the Group and individual companies, but also by Business Line/Company Function and individual asset (i.e. potential or actual operating site).
The Holding Company's Sustainability Planning, Pe¥ormance Management and Human Rights unit, in charge of the materiality analysis at Group level, plays a steering and coordination role, providing guidelines and methodological suppo for analysis at the country, company , and asset level, carried out by local managers with the involvement of stakeholders and key people at the Company level. The results achieved for individual companies and/or countries are then consolidated by the Holding Company to prepare the Group's materiality matrix (see "At a Glance" chapter in the "Our priorities" section for detailed information on analysis results).
The scope of the 2020 materiality analysis has been fuher enhanced, notably through the inclusion of new assets in Colombia, Peru, Italy, and South Africa, and together with ever greater integration of results deriving from the application of CSV tools to Group assets.
The CORE&MORE approach of the Enel Group
system, as provided for by Aicle 123-ter of the Consolidated Law on Financial Intermediation


This describes the Enel corporate governance system pursuant to Aicle 123-bis of the Consolidated Law on Financial Intermediation and Aicle 144-decies of the CONSOB Issuers Regulation

1 2 3 4

At a Glance Our ESG peormance Trend Topic Appendix
management of all the Business Lines, which evaluated the relevance of the categories by means of a survey administered by the Holding Company's Sustainability unit, based on the following parameters:
dependence impoance of the relationship for the stakeholder – indicating groups or individuals that depend directly or indirectly on the activities, products or associated services and operations, or on which the organization relies in order to conduct its operations;
inÄuence impoance of the relationship for the Company – indicating groups or individuals that can aect the organization or a stakeholder for the strategic or operational decisional process;
urgency temporal dimension of the relationship indicating groups or individuals requiring the immediate a©ention of the organization in relation to broader nancial, economic, social, or environmental issues.
Specically, from the analysis conducted at Group level, the "Employees" stakeholder achieved a high rating in terms of signicance, considering the contingent pandemic crisis. For fuher details concerning the analysis results, refer to the tables repoed in the section "Our priorities".
In addition, the various units involved each year in the analysis process and those responsible for relations with stakeholders are tasked with engaging them according to the most appropriate methods in view of the communications channels (generic, specic and paicipatory), the type of relations with the group concerned, and the reference context.

102-40 102-43 102-46 102-47 103-1
The aspects investigated within the context of the materiality analysis are, from the stakeholders' perspective, the relative impoance of each issue in their perceptions and the 'direction' of their expectations (expectations of engagement, rather than disengagement, by Enel), and, from the Company's perspective, the level of the impact of the issues on its business strategies.
Since 2016, Enel has integrated the process of assessing the level of stakeholder satisfaction in relation to their expectations with respect to the issues subject to analysis: the results achieved, compared with the priorities assigned by stakeholders, allow us to obtain an overview of stakehold-

er expectations and help to identify the issues on which the Company needs to focus. These results are shown in the following "Expectations Matrix" which, for most of the issues addressed, reects a high degree of alignment between the priorities assigned by stakeholders and their level of satisfaction ("maintain" area). An exception is represented by the "Customer focus" issue, for which the Company monitors evolution of the priority and satisfaction level among stakeholders by means of tools such as customer satisfaction surveys carried out by the dierent Market areas.
In 2020, the results of a number of engagement initiatives carried out by Enel in relation to signicant Group stakeholders, namely business community, customers, nancial community, national and international institutions, civil society and local communities, media, suppliers and contractors, and Enel people have been assessed. There was found an increasing level of capitalization of feedback initiatives to monitor the results of operations by the Company and its Business Lines. Examples include the customer satisfaction surveys carried out by the various Market areas, the #Iworkfromhome survey conducted by the Global People and Organization Function, designed to test the perception of Enel people in relation to post-Covid sma working experience, and the sustainability rating agency questionnaires administered by the Holding unit. Fuhermore, various ad hoc initiatives were carried out for the materiality analysis, such as the online survey addressed to suppliers and carried out by the Global Procurement Function. Other sources considered in the analysis are complaints from customers, relations with analysts and investors, relations with representative and trade associations, institutional relations at the national and local level, trade union relations, media monitoring and opinion polls.
Each unit responsible for relations with stakeholders in the countries of presence seeks to engage an increasing-
102-40 102-42 102-46 103-1
The issues subject to the 2020 materiality analysis were de ned on the basis of several aspects, including company policies and rules of conduct, stakeholder feedback initiatives, the issues of greatest interest for sustainability rating agencies, industry benchmarking studies and the Company's strategic orientation.
The various units responsible for relations with stakeholders, involved in the analysis process each year, are tasked with identifying and updating the list of signicant stakeholder categories to draw up a complete list of current and potential stakeholders and to ensure constant alignment with the sustainability context in which Enel operates. The methodology adopted involves an annual update to the results achieved in the previous year and, every two years, an analysis to determine a possible revision of the issues and categories of stakeholders subject to analysis, to take account of any changes in the context in which the Company operates.

The process involves constant, direct paicipation by the Company's external and internal stakeholders, including its top managers, through one-on-one interviews, surveys and other tools.
In 2020, the stakeholder categories identication and prioritization process beneted from the involvement of top


ly large number of stakeholders, while selecting those are most relevant to the activities peaining to the unit itself. Specically, in the context of the Global Power Generation Business Line, in 2020 the Argentinian Sustainability unit carried out engagement initiatives, especially in relation to civil society and local communities; conversely, the Endesa SA Sustainability unit focused on the use of surveys aimed at engaging suppliers and contractors. In some cases, where necessary, stakeholder engagement is carried out ad hoc for execution of the materiality analysis.
102-46 102-47 103-1
The materiality of the various issues in Enel's strategies was assessed through the involvement of the various company Functions and submi©ed to the Chairman and Chief Executive Ocer by means of a specic interview and administration of a dedicated online survey. This analysis reects the guidelines set down in the 2021-2023 Strategic Plan, the goals of the Functions/Business Lines, and the commitments assumed by the Group through its policies and rules of conduct.
Fuher to the "Impact Evaluation" pilot project launched in 2019, in 2020 the analysis was completed in order to identify the impacts generated by the Company on the economy, the environment, and people, considering possible violations of human rights in relation to negative impacts, and assessing the contribution to sustainable development in relation to positive impacts. The project, which was rolled out in all the 18 countries that carry out the materiality analysis, was conducted by each local Sustainability unit which, in line with the requirements of the main reference standards (notably the "Exposure Draft" document published by GRI in June 2020), identied the main positive and negative impacts staing from an external context analysis, i.e. considering the highest priority issues for stakeholders; moreover, each impact was analyzed in accordance with its direct and indirect contribution to the SDGs, in line with the commitment assumed by the Group, and with respect to the management tools implemented to monitor the set objectives.


In addition to this project, the "Actual Response" evaluation activity, concerning all the countries involved in the materiality analysis process, was carried out also in 2020. The evaluation was designed to collect and process the measures implemented by Group companies to manage the highest priority issues, such as risk analysis, denition of targets, and study of pe¥ormance achieved, in order to make a comparative assessment of the Company's level of coverage of the issues in question.
In relation to the activities described above, the following table summarizes the results, representing, for the three material issues identied by stakeholders, the main risks borne, the main positive and negative impacts generated by the Company in relation to the external context, the reference SDGs for impacts that create value for the community and/or the environment, and the strategies and pe¥ormance adopted by the Company. We have included, by way of example, several cases that emerged from the analysis thanks to the contribution of the local Sustainability units.
As regards the "Energy distribution" issue, Romania identi ed a potential negative impact concerning the increase of noise and environmental pollution as a result of new investments in the network, which could generate repercussions in the sho term in relation to various stakeholder categories, including employees, communities, and suppliers. Concerning the "Decarbonization of the energy mix" issue, Russia too identied a potential negative impact associated with the increased local unemployment rate caused by the closure of conventional power plants, which could have sho term eects from the economic and social perspectives in relation to the local communities surrounding the plants in question. Finally, in relation to the issue of "Sound governance and fair corporate conduct", Argentina recorded a positive impact due to the Company's adoption of measures and standards (e.g. ISO 37001) designed to mitigate corruption problems at the local level, generating a direct and immediate eect on the community in question and also contributing to SDG 16 (Peace, justice and strong institutions).



Decarbonization of the energy mix Environmental management
Includes the following issues: "New technologies and solutions for Homes and Condominiums"; "New technologies and solutions for Cities"; "New technologies and solutions for Industries"; "Electric mobility". (1)
1 2 3 4
At a Glance Our ESG peormance Trend Topic Appendix
Thanks to its representation in the materiality matrix in the "At a Glance" chapter (with reference to the "Our priorities" section), joint analysis of stakeholder and Company aspects
| ESG category | 2020 materiality assessment issue |
GRI Standard or Electric Utilities Sector Disclosures Aspect |
Internal boundary |
External boundary |
Reporting limitations on internal boundary |
Reporting limitations on external boundary |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Economic and financial value creation |
GRI 201: Economic performance | Group | - | - | - | |
| GRI 205: Anti-corruption | - | |||||
| Sound governance and fair corporate conduct |
GRI 206: Anti-competitive behavior | - | ||||
| GRI 207: Taxes | Group | - | ||||
| GRI 406: Non-discrimination | ||||||
| BUSINESS & | GRI 415: Public policy | |||||
| Decarbonization of the energy mix |
GRI 201: Economic performance | - | ||||
| GRI 305: Emissions | Group | - | - | |||
| GOVERNANCE | System efficiency | |||||
| GRI 417: Marketing and labelling | - | |||||
| Customer focus | GRI 418: Customer privacy | Group | - | - | ||
| Provision of information | ||||||
| Ecosystems and platforms1 |
Research & Development | Group | - | - | - | |
| Access | - | - | ||||
| Energy distribution |
System efficiency | Group | - | |||
| Demand management | ||||||
| Innovation and digital transformation |
Research & Development | - | - | - |
has made it possible to assess the degree of "alignment" or "misalignment" between the priority of action assigned by the stakeholders to the various issues and the degree of commitment assumed by the Group in relation to the same issues. The following table contains the codes for the issues included in the materiality analysis as established in the GRI Standards or the "Aspects" of the GRI supplement dedicated to the electric utilities sector ("Electric Utilities Sector Disclosures") of reference, along with an indication of the context internal and external to the organization and the limitations on the scope.
(1) Includes the following issues: "New technologies and solutions for Homes and Condominiums"; "New technologies and solutions for Cities"; "New technologies and solutions for Industries"; "Electric mobility".


| Materiality issues for stakeholders |
Area of risk | Main impact incurred |
Main impact generated |
Impact classification |
Reference SDG for positive impacts |
Strategy and performance (Ref. Report chapter) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ENERGY DISTRIBUTION Service qual | ity manage ment |
Potential reputation al, economic or fi nancial losses due to failure to achieve the required and agreed service levels |
Reduction of net work reliability due to delayed mainte nance |
- | "Electrification, digital and platforms" |
|
| Guarantee of access to electricity in rural areas thanks to service quality improvements |
"Local and global communities" |
|||||
| SOUND GOVERNANCE AND FAIR CORPORATE CONDUCT |
Compliance with laws and regulations |
The practices adopted by the company do not comply with the internal procedures and/or policies and/ or with the law and external regulations |
Aid/fail to help reduce corruption at local level through the adoption of measures and standards by the Company (e.g. ISO 37001) |
"Sound governance" |
||
| DECARBONIZATION OF THE ENERGY MIX |
Climate change |
Inadequate defini tion of the Group strategy due to errors in estimating the effect of ongo ing climate change on Group opera tions and/or due to |
Redeployment of local personnel due to closure of conventional power plants |
- | "Our people" | |
| estimates based on unrealistic/unreliable data |
Increase in installed renewable capacity in order to make the national energy mix more sustainable and reduce GHG emissions |
"Net-zero ambition" |
Positivo Negativo Impact classi£cation Positive Negative
The structure of the 2020 Sustainability Repo was developed in accordance with the materiality analysis, focusing more closely on the material issues, which are covered in detail in dedicated chapters. Likewise, the materiality level of the issues – divided in turn into dedicated sub-issues – inuenced the level of detail with which to treat each subject and repo the associated GRI indicators (GRI Standards and Electric Utilities Sector Disclosure) in order to be in accordance (Core option), and also the choice of the most appropriate tools to represent them (2020 Consolidated Annual Repo and appended repos), to which reference was made for the treatment or detailed investigation of more specic topics, respectively, of economic pe¥ormance and governance. The materiality analysis also formed the basis for denition of Enel's sustainability goals for the 2021-2023 period, as illustrated by the Sustainability Plan (see "Our sustainability strategy" section of the "At a Glance" chapter).
The GRI Context Index, included in the Appendix, contains references to the 2020 Sustainability Repo and the Group's other repoing instruments. Please also consult the website www.enel.com for fuher information, for example regarding innovation projects or the activities of Enel's foundations and the 2020 Informe de Sostenibilidad by Endesa and Enel Américas for additional details concerning initiatives dedicated to customers and local communities in Spain and South America.
102-56
The process of repoing and monitoring the Key Pe¥ormance Indicators ("KPIs") relevant to sustainability involves the Holding Company, with regard to transversal issues, and all Group Business Lines, Functions and companies for issues and indicators specic to the various sectors of activity.
Those responsible for collecting, verifying and processing the relevant KPIs are identied within the units involved. The Sustainability Planning and Pe¥ormance Management and Human Rights unit, which forms pa of the Innovability® Function, is responsible for consolidating information and coordinating the entire 2020 Sustainability Repo drafting process.
The Repo was submi©ed for analysis and evaluation to the Enel Control and Risk Commi©ee on April 12, 2021 and to the Corporate Governance and Sustainability Commi©ee on April 14. It was approved by the Board of Directors on April 15. The document will then be presented to the General Shareholders' Meeting together with the Group's Consolidated Annual Repo.
| 1 | At a Glance | 2 Our ESG peormance |
3 | Trend Topic | 4 | Appendix |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ESG category | 2020 materiality assessment issue |
GRI Standard or Electric Utilities Sector Disclosures Aspect |
Internal boundary |
External boundary |
Reporting limitations on internal boundary |
Reporting limitations on external boundary |
| GRI 301: Materials | ||||||
| GRI 302: Energy | ||||||
| ENVIRONMENTAL Environmental management |
GRI 303: Water and wastewater | |||||
| GRI 304: Biodiversity | Group | - | - | - | ||
| GRI 305: Emissions | ||||||
| GRI 306: Waste | ||||||
| GRI 307: Environmental compliance | ||||||
| GRI 401: Employment | ||||||
| GRI 402: Labor/Management relations |
||||||
| GRI 404: Training and education | ||||||
| People | GRI 405: Diversity and equal opportunity |
|||||
| management, development and |
GRI 407: Freedom of association and collective bargaining |
Group | - | - | - | |
| motivation | GRI 408: Child labor | |||||
| GRI 409: Forced or compulsory labor |
||||||
| GRI 410: Safety practices | ||||||
| GRI 412: Human Rights Assessment | ||||||
| SOCIAL | Occupational health and safety |
GRI 403: Occupational health and safety |
Group | Suppliers | - | Reporting not extended to suppliers |
| GRI 411: Rights of indigenous peoples |
||||||
| GRI 413: Local communities | ||||||
| Engaging local communities |
GRI 416: Customer health and safety |
Group | - | - | - | |
| Disaster/emergency planning and |
This Repo has been subjected to a limited audit by an independent auditing company, KPMG SpA, engaged also to audit the Enel Group's Consolidated Annual Repo. The limited audit was conducted in accordance with international standard ISAE 3000 (Revised)1 and, accordingly, the Code of Ethics for Professional Accountants, including professional independence and verication of the absence of conicts of interest that may aect the ethical principles of integrity, objectivity, professional competence and diligence, condentiality and professional conduct. The audit repo, which contains a detailed description of the principles adopted, activities pe¥ormed and conclusions reached, is a©ached hereto.
In addition, the repo on the green bond, also subjected to limited assurance by KPMG SpA according to the criteria indicated in standard ISAE 3000, is annexed to this Repo; the related audit repo is supplied as an a©achment to this Sustainability Repo.
The GHG Inventory Statements were audited by DNV GL, with a reasonable level of ceainty for Scope 1, Scope 2 and Scope 3 emissions, restricted to natural gas sales activities, and with a limited level of ceainty for the other Scope 3 emissions included in the scope of application of the inventory. The audit was conducted according to ISO 4064-3 for compliance of greenhouse gas (GHG) inventories with the WBCSD/WRI Corporate Accounting and Repoing Standard (GHG Protocol).
chain
response Access Sustainable supply GRI 204: Procurement practices Group Suppliers - Reporting not extended to suppliers GRI 308: Supplier Environmental Assessment GRI 414: Supplier Social
Assessment

(1) International Standard on Assurance Engagements (ISAE) 3000 revised, "Assurance Engagements Other than Audits or Reviews of Historical Financial Information".
,000 / thousands ,000 d / thousands of days ,000 h / thousands of hours ,000 t / thousands of tons % / percentage years / years cent euros / euro cents g/kWh / grams per kilowa© hour g/kWh eq / grams per equivalent kilowa© hour4 g/kWh eq / grams per equivalent kilowa© hour dd / days GW / gigawa©s GWh / gigawa© hours h / hours h/per cap / hours per capita r / rate kg / kilograms km / kilometers kWh / kilowa© hours kWh eq / equivalent kilowa© hours5 kWh/t / kilowa© hours per ton kWp / peak kilowa©s l/kWh / liters per kilowa© hour l/kWh eq / liters per equivalent kilowa© hour5 billions of m3 / billions of cubic meters MJ/kWh eq / megajoules per equivalent kilowa© hour5 ML / megaliters mil million mil A4 eq / millions of equivalent A4 sheets mil euros / millions of euros mil h / millions of hours mil l / millions of liters mil m3 / millions of cubic meters mil t / millions of tons mil t eq / millions of equivalent tons min / minutes Mtoe / millions of tons of oil equivalent MW / megawa©s MWh / megawa© hours no. / number sec / seconds t / tons TBq per unit / terabecquerels per unit Toe / tons of oil equivalent TJ / terajoules TWh / Terawa© hours

BOD Biochemical Oxygen Demand BoD Board of Directors CCGT Combined Cycle Gas Turbine CERT Cyber Emergency Readiness Team COD Chemical Oxygen Demand CSR Corporate Social Responsibility CSV Creating Shared Value LV Low Voltage EBIT Earnings Before Interest and Tax EBITDA Earnings Before Interest, Tax, Depreciation and Amoization EBT Earnings Before Tax EGP Enel Green Power EIB European Investment Bank EPS Earnings per Share ESG Environmental Social & Governance HV High Voltage IPO Initial Public Oering IRAP Imposta Regionale sulle A©ività Produ©ive (Regional Business Tax) IRES Imposta sul Reddito delle Società (Corporate Income Tax) LBG London Benchmarking Group MV Medium Voltage PCBs Polychlorinated Biphenyls R&D Research & Development RT Remote Training SCIGR Internal Control and Risk Management System S&P Standard & Poor's SRI Socially Responsible Investor TSR Total Shareholder Return SDG Sustainable Development Goal TCFD Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosure
UN United Nations
102-10 102-45 102-48 102-49 102-50 102-56
The information and data presented in the Repo refer to Enel SpA and the companies within the scope of line-byline consolidation at December 31, 2020, in accordance with the Group's nancial consolidation scope. In addition to the line-by-line consolidation scope, the document also includes the data and information regarding the company Asociación Nuclear Ascó-Vandellós II AIE (ANA CNVII AIE), to which the two Spanish nuclear plants of Ascó and Vandellós are a©ributed. The company, considered to be a joint operation in line with the provisions of accounting standard IFRS 112, is included in the Group's nancial scope of consolidation under the propoional method, and is included in this repo using the same method to ensure the impacts are adequately represented, given that it is a signicant Group entity. The sole exception to the line-by-line consolidation scope are the companies acquired in 2020, for which, on the basis of prevailing practice, as also represented in the Consob repo of January 19, 20183, it was decided to begin consolidation, with regard to some of the areas covered in this document, with eect from 2021, in the light of the reduced acquisition period. The areas of exclusion have been indicated directly in the specic chapters.
In paicular, the main organizational changes aecting the Enel Group in 2020 were:
sale of the Wild Plains special purpose vehicle, 100% controlled by Tradewind. The sale did not produce any accounting impacts in prot and loss;
sale by Endesa Energia of 80% of Endesa Soluciones. This investment, which was previously fully consolidated, is now measured at equity;
acquisition by Enel Green Power España of 100% of Parque Eólico Tico SLU, Tico Solar 1 SLU and Tico Solar 2 SLU;
acquisition by Endesa Generación Pougal of 100% of Suggestion Power Unipessoal Lda;
acquisition by Enel X International of a 60% stake in Viva Labs AS;
acquisition by Enel Green Power Panamá of 100% of Jagüito Solar and Progreso Solar;
disposal of several joint ventures held at 50%, included in the Enel Noh America hydroelectric pofolio.
For more detailed information on the changes, refer to the 2020 Consolidated Annual Repo in the sections "Main changes in the scope of consolidation" and "Signicant events in 2020".
If the associated companies (measured at equity in the Consolidated Annual Repo) and other entities over which Enel exercises signicant inuence (including joint ventures) produce substantial impacts, they are included in the data calculation in propoion to Enel's holding, and referenced in the text. We invite you to refer to the 2020 Consolidated Annual Repo for details of the companies included the scope of consolidation.
In this Statement, the terms "Corporate", "Holding Company" and "Parent Company" refer to Enel SpA, whereas "Group", "Enel" and "Company" refer to Enel SpA and its subsidiaries.
Various deviations from the KPIs and information included in the 2019 Sustainability Repo are the result of changes in the Group's scope of consolidation.
The eects of changes in the scope of consolidation, together with any signicant changes or limitations of the scope or methods of calculating individual indicators compared with 2019, are expressly indicated in the text and/or the Appendix, along with the eects on the related data. See the notes in the tables in the Appendix for all fuher details regarding adjustments with respect to already published data, calculation methods, assumptions or signi cant limitations of indicators.
The data have been thoroughly calculated on the basis of the results of Enel's accounting, non-accounting and other information systems, and validated by the persons responsible in each case. Data determined through the use of estimates and related calculation method have been expressly indicated. In the comparison of the data over time, it should be noted that dierences between 2020 and 2019, in absolute and percent terms, have been calculated considering decimal places in some cases not visible in the printed document. In the tables containing quantitative data, percent changes in excess of |100%| are indicated by "-".
(4) Corresponding to the sum of electrical energy and heat.
(2) A "joint operation" is a joint-control arrangement in which the paies that hold joint control have rights to the assets and obligations for the liabilities associated with the arrangement.
(3) Illustrative repo on the results of the consultation and the consequences for regulation, the activities of companies and operators and the interests of investors and savers.

KPMG S.p.A. Revisione e organizzazione contabile Via Curtatone, 3 00185 ROMA RM Telefono +39 06 80961.1 Email it [email protected] PEC [email protected]
KPMG S.p.A. è una società per azioni di diritto italiano e fa parte del network KPMG di entità indipendenti affiliate a KPMG International Limited, società di diritto inglese.
Ancona Bari Bergamo Bologna Bolzano Brescia Catania Como Firenze Genova Lecce Milano Napoli Novara Padova Palermo Parma Perugia Pescara Roma Torino Treviso Trieste Varese Verona
Società per azioni Capitale sociale Euro 10.415.500,00 i.v. Registro Imprese Milano Monza Brianza Lodi e Codice Fiscale N. 00709600159 R.E.A. Milano N. 512867 Partita IVA 00709600159 VAT number IT00709600159 Sede legale: Via Vittor Pisani, 25 20124 Milano MI ITALIA
(Translation from the Italian original which remains the definitive version)
Independent auditors' report on the consolidated non financial statement pursuant to article 3.10 of Legislative decree no. 254 of 30 December 2016 and article 5 of the Consob Regulation adopted with Resolution no. 20267 of 18 January 2018
To the board of directors of Enel S.p.A.
Pursuant to article 3.10 of Legislative decree no. 254 of 30 December 2016 (the "decree") and article 5 of the Consob (the Italian Commission for listed companies and the stock exchange) Regulation adopted with Resolution no. 20267 of 18 J anuary 2018, we have been engaged to perform a limited assurance engagement on the 2020 consolidated non -financial statement of the Enel Group (the "group ") prepared in accordance with article 4 of the decree and approved by the board of directors on 15 March 2021 (the "NFS ").
The directors are responsible for the preparation of an NFS in accordance with articles 3 and 4 of the decree and the "Global Reporting Initiative Sustainability Reporting Standards" issued by GRI - Global Reporting Initiative (the "GRI Standards "), which they have identified as the reporting standards.
The directors are also responsible, within the terms established by the Italian law, for such internal control as they determine is necessary to enable the preparation of an NFS that is free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error.
Moreover, the directors are responsible for the identification of the content of the NFS, considering the aspects indicated in article 3.1 of the decree and the group 's business and characteristics, to the extent necessary to enable an understanding of the group 's business, performance, results and the impacts it generates.
The directors' responsibility also includes the design of an internal model for the management and organisation of the group 's activities, as well as, with reference to the aspects identified and disclosed in the NFS, the group 's policies and the identification and management of the risks generated or borne.
Enel Group Independent auditors ' report 31 December 2020
2
The C olleg io Sindacale is responsible for overseeing, within the terms established by the Italian law, compliance with the decree 's provisions.
We are independent in compliance with the independence and all other ethical requirements of the International Code of Ethics for Professional Accountants (including International Independence Standards, the IESBA Code) issued by the International Ethics Standards Board for Accountants, which is founded on fundamental principles of integrity, objectivity, professional competence and due care, confidentiality and professional behaviour. Our company applies International Standard on Quality Control 1 (ISQC Italia 1) and, accordingly, maintains a system of quality control including documented policies and procedures regarding compliance with ethical requirements, professional standards and applicable legal and regulatory requirements.
Our responsibility is to express a conclusion, based on the procedures performed, about the compliance of the NFS with the requirements of the decree and the GRI Standards. We carried out our work in accordance with the criteria established by "International Standard on Assurance Engagements 3000 (revised) - Assurance Engagements other than Audits or Reviews of Historical Financial Information" ("ISAE 3000 revised "), issued by the International Auditing and Assurance Standards Board applicable to limited assurance engagements. This standard requires that we plan and perform the engagement to obtain limited assurance about whether the NFS is free from material misstatement. A limited assurance engagement is less in scope than a reasonable assurance engagement carried out in accordance with ISAE 3000 revised, and consequently does not enable us to obtain assurance that we would become aware of all significant matters and events that might be identified in a reasonable assurance engagement.
The procedures we performed on the NFS are based on our professional judgement and include inquiries of the parent 's personnel responsible for the preparation of the information presented in the NFS, documental analyses, recalculations and other evidence gathering procedures, as appropriate.
Specifically, we carried out the following procedures:
's business and characteristics disclosed in the NFS, in order to assess the reasonableness of the identification process adopted on the basis of the provisions of article 3 of the decree and taking
Analysing and assessing the identification criteria for the reporting scope, in order
Comparing the financial disclosures presented in the NFS with those included in

's policies in connection with the aspects set out in article 3 of the decree, the achieved results and the related key performance indicators;

Enel Group Independent auditors ' report 31 December 2020
3

Moreover, we checked the above against the disclosures presented in the NFS and carried out the procedures described in point 5.a).
Specifically, we held interviews and discussions with the parent 's management personnel and personnel of Enel Russia PJ SC, Emgesa SA ESP, Enel Produzione S.p.A. and Endesa Generació n S.A.. We also performed selected procedures on documentation to gather information on the processes and procedures used to gather, combine, process and transmit non-financial data and information to the office that prepares the NFS.
Furthermore, with respect to significant information, considering the group 's business and characteristics:
we held videoconferences with the management of Enel Russia PJ SC, Emgesa SA ESP and Enel Produzione S.p.A., which we have selected on the basis of their business, contribution to the key performance indicators at consolidated level and location, to obtain documentary evidence supporting the correct application of the procedures and methods used to calculate the indicators.
Based on the procedures performed, nothing has come to our attention that causes us to believe that the 2020 consolidated non -financial statement of the Enel Group has not been prepared, in all material respects, in accordance with the requirements of articles 3 and 4 of the decree and the GRI Standards.
The NFS presents the corresponding figures included in the 2018 and 2019 consolidated non -financial statements for comparative purposes, on which other auditors performed a limited assurance engagement and expressed their unqualified conclusions on 17 April 2019 and 8 April 2020, respectively.
Rome, 19 April 2021
KPMG S.p.A.
(signed on the original)
Marco Maffei Director of Audit

Certificate of verification by the DNV GL Certification Body of the ENEL Group's greenhouse gas emissions reported in the 2020 Sustainability Report.
The verification was conducted by DNV GL in accordance with ISO 14064 -3 with a reasonable level of guarantee for all Scope 1 and Scope 2 emissions reported by the Group. Scope 3 emissions were verified with a limited level of guarantee, excepted for Scope 3 emissions associated with the use of natural gas sold in the retail market, which was verified with a reasonable level of
Place and date: For the issuing DNV GL office: Vimercate 16 April 2021 DNV GL – Business Assurance
Zeno Beltrami Management Representative
Lack of fulfillness with the conditions laid down in the certification contract may render this certificate not valid DNV GL Business Assurance Italia S.r.l. - Via Energy Park, 14 - 20871 Vimercate (MB) - Italy – Tel. 039.68 99 905 – www.dnvgl.com/it

Page 1 of 3

Statement No: 10000456232-Assessment Services-ACCREDIA-ITA
First Issuance Date: 16 April 2021
Statement Validity: 16 April 2021 – 15 April 2022
DNV Business Assurance has verified, in accordance with the Standard ISO 14064-3, the Greenhouse Gas (hereinafter "GHG") emissions of the organization
ENEL SpA Viale Regina Margherita,137 00198 Rome

reported in the GHG inventory descriptive document entitled "Quantificazione e rendicontazione delle emissioni di gas a effetto serra secondo lo standard corporativo 'The Greenhouse Gas Protocol' del anno 2020" ( hereinafter "the GHG Inventory Report") issued the 15 April 2021 by ENEL SpA using a financial control consolidation approach and relative to the direct and the indirect activities below reported carried out worldwide by the Group companies described in the aforementioned GHG Inventory Report.
Based on our verification process procedures, DNV GL states that:
| 2020 | 2017 | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GHGS (tons CO2-eq) | CO2 | CH4 | N20 | NF3 | SFE | HFCs | TOTAL | BASELINE | |
| DIRECT EMISSIONS (SCOPE1) | 44,901,758 | 24,571 | 101,089 | 10 | 156,418 | 71.153 | 45,255,000 | 86,156,859 | |
| From Flectricity Power Generaltion | 44,731,697 | 23,934 | 96,815 | 24,954 | 9.528 | 44.886.928 | 85.918.515 | ||
| From Electricity Distribution | 15,404 | 18 | 1,588 | **** | 131,464 | 0 | 148.473 | 150,292 | |
| From Services | 142,312 | 614 | 2,680 | 61,625 | 207,230 | 88.052 | |||
| From Other Activities | 12,345 | 6 | 6 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 12,367 | 0 | |
| ENERGY INDIRECT ENISSIONS LOC (SCOLES) | **** | *** | *** | **** | *** | *** | 4,990,685 | 5,003,304 | |
| From electricity purchased from the grid (location based) | **** | **** | 1.430.001 | 1.497.912 | |||||
| From grid trasmission & distribution losses (location based | *** | 3.560.684 | 3.505.392 | ||||||
| ENERGY INDIRECT EMISSIONS MKT (SCOPES) | *** | *** | **** | *** | 7,855,954 | 7,210,693 | |||
| From electricity purchased from the grid (market based) | *** | **** | 2,204,890 | 2,194,024 | |||||
| From grid trasmission & distribution losses (market based) | 5.571.064 | 5.016.669 | |||||||
| OTHER INDIRECT EMISSIONS (SCOPE3) | 46,619,125 | 1,070,832 | 11,690 | 47,701,647 | 55,397,102 | ||||
| Cat.3 Fuel and Energy related activities | 1.061.268 | **** | **** | 1.061.268 | 3.815.830 | ||||
| Cat.4 Upstream transportation and distribution | 115.519 | *** | *** | *** | 115,519 | 831,265 | |||
| Cat.11 electricity sold in the retail market | 25.041.014 | **** | *** | 25,041,014 | 25,460,118 | ||||
| Cat.11 natural gas sold in the retail market | 21,462,592 | 9,564 | 11,690 | 21,483,846 | 25,289,889 | ||||
| TOTAL EMISSIONS (Location Based) | **** | **** | **** | *** | *** | 97,947,332 | 146,557,265 | ||
| TOTAL EMISSIONS (Market Based) | *** | *** | **** | 100.812.601 | 148.764.654 |
Scope 1 and Scope 2 emissions and Scope 3 emission associated to use of natural gas sold in the retail market provide, in our opinion and with the qualification listed in the annex of this Statement, a balanced representation of GHG emissions associated to the reported activities of the organisation in the reporting period.
with regards to the Scope 3 emissions not associated to use of natural gas sold in the retail market, nothing has come to our attention showing that what reported by the organization is not a balanced representation of GHG emissions associated to the reported activities carried out by third parties in the reporting period

| GRI/ EUSS KPI |
UM | December 2020 December 2019 December 2018 | 2020-2019 | % | Scope | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EU1 | GENERATION | |||||||
| Installed capacity | ||||||||
| Net efficient generation capacity by primary energy source |
||||||||
| Thermal net capacity | (MW) | 35,623 | 38,897 | 43,099 | -3,274 | -8.4 | Enel | |
| Coal | (MW) | 8,903 | 11,695 | 15,828 | -2,792 -23.9 | Enel | ||
| CCGT | (MW) | 15,009 | 14,991 | 15,021 | 18 | 0.1 | Enel | |
| Oil/Gas | (MW) | 11,711 | 12,211 | 12,250 | -500 | -4.1 | Enel | |
| Nuclear net capacity | (MW) | 3,328 | 3,318 | 3,318 | 10 | 0.3 | Enel | |
| Renewable net capacity | (MW) | 45,016 | 42,134 | 39,203 | 2,882 | 6.8 | Enel | |
| Hydroelectric | (MW) | 27,820 | 27,830 | 27,844 | -10 | - | Enel | |
| Wind | (MW) | 12,412 | 10,327 | 8,190 | 2,085 | 20.2 | Enel | |
| Geothermal | (MW) | 882 | 878 | 804 | 4 | 0.5 | Enel | |
| Biomass and cogeneration | (MW) | 5 | 5 | 42 | - | - | Enel | |
| Photovoltaic | (MW) | 3,897 | 3,094 | 2,322 | 803 26.0 | Enel | ||
| Total net electrical capacity | (MW) | 83,967 | 84,349 | 85,620 | -382 -1,271 | Enel | ||
| Net efficient generation capacity by geographic area |
||||||||
| Italy | (MW) | 26,400 | 27,451 | 27,624 | -1,051 | -3.8 | Italy | |
| Iberia | (MW) | 21,652 | 23,348 | 22,717 | -1,696 | -7.3 | Iberia | |
| Latin America | (MW) | 21,960 | 21,200 | 21,603 | 760 | 3.6 Latin America | ||
| Chile | (MW) | 7,118 | 7,232 | 7,448 | -114 | -1.6 | Chile | |
| Argentina | (MW) | 4,419 | 4,419 | 4,419 | - | - | Argentina | |
| Colombia | (MW) | 3,592 | 3,592 | 3,583 | - | - | Colombia | |
| Peru | (MW) | 2,301 | 2,299 | 2,297 | 2 | 0.1 | Peru | |
| Brazil | (MW) | 3,922 | 3,050 | 3,250 | 872 | 28.6 | Brazil | |
| Uruguay | (MW) | - | - | - | - | - | Uruguay | |
| Costa Rica | (MW) | 81 | 81 | 81 | - | - | Costa Rica | |
| Guatemala | (MW) | 164 | 164 | 164 | - | - | Guatemala | |
| Panama | (MW) | 362 | 362 | 362 | - | - | Panama | |
| North America | (MW) | 6,643 | 5,282 | 3,220 | 1,361 | 25.8 North America | ||
| United States | (MW) | 5,268 | 4,437 | 2,921 | 831 | 18.7 United States | ||
| Mexico | (MW) | 1,165 | 845 | 299 | 320 | 37.9 | Mexico | |
| Canada | (MW) | 210 | - | - | 210 | - | Canada | |
| Europe | (MW) | 6,402 | 6,292 | 9,761 | 110 | 1.7 | Europe | |
| Russia | (MW) | 5,350 | 5,255 | 8,878 | 95 | 1.8 | Russia | |
| Romania | (MW) | 534 | 534 | 534 | - | - | Romania | |
| Greece | (MW) | 475 | 461 | 307 | - | - | Greece | |
| Bulgaria | (MW) | 42 | 42 | 42 | - | - | Bulgaria |

The key sustainability performance indicators are listed below and form an integral part of this Sustainability Report.
| GRI/ EUSS KPI |
UM | December 2020 December 2019 December 2018 | 2020-2019 | % | Scope | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Africa, Asia and Oceania | (MW) | 911 | 776 | 695 | 135 | 17.3 | Africa, Asia and Oceania |
|
| South Africa | (MW) | 670 | 570 | 522 | 100 | 17.6 South Africa | ||
| India | (MW) | 172 | 172 | 172 | - | - | India | |
| Zambia | (MW) | 34 | 34 | - | - | - | Zambia | |
| Australia | (MW) | 34 | - | - | 34 | - | Australia | |
| Total net electrical capacity | (MW) | 83,967 | 84,349 | 85,620 | -382 | -0.5 | Enel | |
| Power generation plants | ||||||||
| Thermoelectric plants (1) | (no.) | 81 | 84 | 89 | -3 | -3.6 | Enel | |
| Coal plants | (no.) | 10 | 12 | 16 | -2 -16.7 | Enel | ||
| CCGT plants | (no.) | 23 | 23 | 23 | - | - | Enel | |
| Oil/Gas plants | (no.) | 48 | 49 | 50 | -1 | -2.0 | Enel | |
| Nuclear plants | (no.) | 4 | 4 | 4 | - | - | Enel | |
| Renewable energy plants | (no.) | 1,173 | 1,138 | 1,094 | 35 | 3.1 | Enel | |
| Hydroelectric plants | (no.) | 748 | 761 | 750 | -13 | -1.7 | Enel | |
| - of which mini-hydro plants (< 10 MW) | (no.) | 460 | 473 | 460 | -13 | -2.7 | Enel | |
| Wind plants | (no.) | 262 | 226 | 202 | 36 | 15.9 | Enel | |
| Photovoltaic plants | (no.) | 122 | 105 | 99 | 17 | 16.2 | Enel | |
| Geothermal plants | (no.) | 39 | 38 | 35 | 1 | 2.6 | Enel | |
| Biomass plants | (no.) | 2 | 8 | 8 | -6 -75.0 | Enel | ||
| OPERATING RESULTS | ||||||||
| EU2 | GENERATION | |||||||
| Net production by primary energy source |
||||||||
| Thermal net production | (GWh) | 75,909 | 103,459 | 127,333 | -27,550 -26.6 | Enel | ||
| Coal | (GWh) | 13,155 | 37,592 | 64,366 | -24,437 -65.0 | Enel | ||
| CCGT | (GWh) | 43,353 | 44,980 | 38,134 | -1,627 | -3.6 | Enel | |
| Oil/Gas | (GWh) | 19,401 | 20,887 | 24,832 | -1,486 | -7.1 | Enel | |
| Nuclear net production | (GWh) | 25,839 | 26,279 | 24,067 | -440 | -1.7 | Enel | |
| Renewable net production | (GWh) | 105,360 | 99,391 | 98,940 | 5,969 | 6.0 | Enel | |
| Hydroelectric | (GWh) | 62,437 | 62,580 | 65,893 | -143 | -0.2 | Enel | |
| Wind | (GWh) | 30,992 | 26,668 | 22,161 | 4,324 | 16.2 | Enel | |
| Geothermal | (GWh) | 6,167 | 6,149 | 5,881 | 18 | 0.3 | Enel | |
| Biomass and cogeneration | (GWh) | 1 | 21 | 108 | -20 -95.6 | Enel | ||
| Photovoltaic | (GWh) | 5,763 | 3,974 | 4,897 | 1,789 45.0 | Enel | ||
| Total net production | (GWh) | 207,108 | 229,129 | 250,339 | -22,021 | -9.6 | Enel | |
| Net production by geographic area | ||||||||
| Italy | (GWh) | 42,495 | 46,912 | 53,232 | -4,417 | -9.4 | Italy | |
| Iberia | (GWh) | 56,269 | 61,402 | 74,193 | -5,133 | -8.4 | Iberia | |
| Latin America | (GWh) | 69,165 | 71,836 | 70,578 | -2,671 | -3.7 Latin America | ||
| Chile | (GWh) | 19,331 | 21,041 | 20,885 | -1,710 | -8.1 | Chile | |
| Argentina | (GWh) | 13,901 | 12,974 | 13,949 | 927 | 7.1 | Argentina | |
| Colombia | (GWh) | 14,146 | 15,362 | 14,053 | -1,216 | -7.9 | Colombia | |
| Peru | (GWh) | 8,774 | 9,249 | 8,999 | -475 | -5.1 | Peru | |
| Brazil | (GWh) | 10,713 | 11,077 | 9,840 | -364 | -3.3 | Brazil | |
| Uruguay | (GWh) | - | - | 170 | - | - | Uruguay | |
| Costa Rica | (GWh) | 213 | 198 | 305 | 15 | 7.7 | Costa Rica | |
| Guatemala | (GWh) | 518 | 430 | 568 | 88 | 20.5 | Guatemala | |
| Panama | (GWh) | 1,569 | 1,505 | 1,808 | 64 | 4.2 | Panama |
| GRI/ EUSS KPI |
UM | December 2020 December 2019 December 2018 | 2020-2019 | % | Scope | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| North America | (GWh) | 17,182 | 12,969 | 9,752 | 4,213 32.5 North America | |||
| United States | (GWh) | 14,695 | 11,923 | 7,133 | 2,772 | 23.2 United States | ||
| Mexico | (GWh) | 1,920 | 1,046 | 2,619 | 874 | 83.6 | Mexico | |
| Canada | (GWh) | 566 | - | - | 566 | - | Canada | |
| Europe | (GWh) | 20,461 | 34,438 | 41,076 | -13,977 -40.6 | Europe | ||
| Russia | (GWh) | 18,087 | 32,433 | 39,182 | -14,346 -44.2 | Russia | ||
| Romania | (GWh) | 1,275 | 1,251 | 1,227 | 24 | 1.9 | Romania | |
| Greece | (GWh) | 999 | 666 | 577 | 333 50.0 | Greece | ||
| Bulgaria | (GWh) | 100 | 88 | 91 | 12 | 14.0 | Bulgaria | |
| Africa, Asia and Oceania | (GWh) | 1,537 | 1,571 | 1,508 | -34 | -2.2 | Africa, Asia and Oceania |
|
| South Africa | (GWh) | 1,242 | 1,235 | 1,192 | 7 | 0.5 South Africa | ||
| India | (GWh) | 237 | 303 | 315 | -66 -21.7 | India | ||
| Zambia | (GWh) | 58 | 33 | - | 25 | 75.8 | Zambia | |
| Total net production | (GWh) | 207,108 | 229,129 | 250,339 | -22,021 | -9.6 | Enel | |
| Development of renewables | ||||||||
| New renewable power (2): | (MW) | 2,908 | 3,575 | 2,682 | -667 -18.7 | Enel | ||
| Hydroelectric | (MW) | 15 | 51 | 71 | -36 -70.6 | Enel | ||
| Wind | (MW) | 2,086 | 2,227 | 1,415 | -141 | -6.3 | Enel | |
| Geothermal | (MW) | 4 | 75 | 1 | -71 -94.7 | Enel | ||
| Biomass and cogeneration | (MW) | - | - | - | - | - | Enel | |
| Photovoltaic | (MW) | 803 | 1,222 | 1,195 | -419 -34.3 | Enel | ||
| NETWORK | ||||||||
| EU4 | Total electricity distribution network (3) (km) | 2,231,961 | 2,219,007 | 2,226,097 | 12,954 | 0.6 | Enel | |
| Total high-voltage network | (km) | 46,661 | 46,432 | 46,261 | 229 | 0.5 | Enel | |
| - of which underground cable | (km) | 1,992 | 1,992 | 1,976 | - | - | Enel | |
| Total medium-voltage network | (km) | 894,282 | 887,439 | 889,692 | 6,843 | 0.8 | Enel | |
| - of which underground cable | (km) | 223,507 | 221,447 | 219,203 | 2,060 | 0.9 | Enel | |
| Total low-voltage network | (km) | 1,291,018 | 1,285,136 | 1,290,144 | 5,882 | 0.5 | Enel | |
| - of which underground cable | (km) | 413,636 | 405,321 | 403,098 | 8,315 | 2.1 | Enel | |
| EU4 | Electricity distribution network by geographic area |
|||||||
| Total electricity distribution network Italy |
(km) | 1,159,859 | 1,157,527 | 1,153,323 | 2,332 | 0.2 | Italy | |
| High-voltage network | (km) | 20 | 22 | 13 | -2 -10.8 | Italy | ||
| - of which underground cable | (km) | 11 | 11 | 11 | - | - | Italy | |
| Medium-voltage network | (km) | 357,799 | 356,622 | 354,884 | 1,177 | 0.3 | Italy | |
| - of which underground cable | (km) | 153,073 | 151,703 | 150,201 | 1,370 | 0.9 | Italy | |
| Low-voltage network | (km) | 802,041 | 800,883 | 798,426 | 1,158 | 0.1 | Italy | |
| - of which underground cable | (km) | 278,936 | 278,255 | 276,744 | 681 | 0.2 | Italy | |
| Total electricity distribution network Romania |
(km) | 131,322 | 129,363 | 128,508 | 1,959 | 1.5 | Romania | |
| High-voltage network | (km) | 6,528 | 6,521 | 6,511 | 7 | 0.1 | Romania | |
| - of which underground cable | (km) | 312 | 311 | 304 | 1 | 0.3 | Romania | |
| Medium-voltage network | (km) | 35,630 | 35,173 | 35,062 | 457 | 1.3 | Romania | |
| - of which underground cable | (km) | 13,981 | 13,675 | 13,343 | 306 | 2.2 | Romania | |
| Low-voltage network | (km) | 89,164 | 87,669 | 86,935 | 1,495 | 1.7 | Romania | |
| - of which underground cable Total electricity distribution network |
(km) | 27,586 | 21,004 | 20,829 | 6,582 | 31.3 | Romania | |
| Iberia | (km) | 315,365 | 316,332 | 319,613 | -967 | -0.3 | Iberia | |
| High-voltage network | (km) | 19,642 | 19,593 | 19,625 | 49 | 0.2 | Iberia | |
| - of which underground cable | (km) | 793 | 787 | 787 | 6 | 0.8 | Iberia | |
| Medium-voltage network | (km) | 114,003 | 115,943 | 118,531 | -1,940 | -1.7 | Iberia |


| GRI/ EUSS KPI |
UM | December 2020 December 2019 December 2018 | 2020-2019 | % | Scope | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| - of which underground cable | (km) | 41,033 | 40,771 | 41,188 | 262 | 0.6 | Iberia | |
| Low-voltage network | (km) | 181,720 | 180,795 | 181,457 | 925 | 0.5 | Iberia | |
| - of which underground cable | (km) | 86,024 | 85,281 | 85,067 | 743 | 0.9 | Iberia | |
| Total electricity distribution network Latin America (3) |
(km) | 625,415 | 615,786 | 624,653 | 9,629 | 1.6 Latin America | ||
| High-voltage network | (km) | 20,472 | 20,296 | 20,112 | 176 | 0.9 Latin America | ||
| - of which underground cable | (km) | 885 | 883 | 874 | 2 | 0.2 Latin America | ||
| Medium-voltage network | (km) | 386,850 | 379,701 | 381,214 | 7,149 | 1.9 Latin America | ||
| - of which underground cable | (km) | 15,420 | 15,298 | 14,471 | 122 | 0.8 Latin America | ||
| Low-voltage network | (km) | 218,093 | 215,789 | 223,326 | 2,304 | 1.1 Latin America | ||
| - of which underground cable | (km) | 21,090 | 20,781 | 20,458 | 309 | 1.5 Latin America | ||
| Energy transported (4) | (TWh) | 484.6 | 507.7 | 484.4 | -23 | -4.5 | Enel | |
| SALES | ||||||||
| Electricity volumes sold by market (5) | ||||||||
| Volumes sold free market | (GWh) | 160,202 | 172,700 | 152,619 | -12,498 | -7.2 | Enel | |
| Italy | (GWh) | 59,900 | 61,985 | 64,500 | -2,085 | -3.4 | Italy | |
| Iberia | (GWh) | 69,430 | 78,056 | 76,772 | -8,626 -11.1 | Iberia | ||
| Romania | (GWh) | 7,178 | 7,647 | 7,519 | -469 | -6.1 | Romania | |
| Latin America | (GWh) | 23,694 | 25,012 | 3,828 | -1,318 | -5.3 Latin America | ||
| Volumes sold regulated market | (GWh) | 137,984 | 149,324 | 142,813 | -11,340 | -7.6 | Enel | |
| Italy | (GWh) | 30,305 | 35,554 | 39,818 | -5,249 -14.8 | Italy | ||
| Iberia | (GWh) | 11,342 | 11,385 | 12,867 | -43 | -0.4 | Iberia | |
| Romania | (GWh) | 1,643 | 2,088 | 2,881 | -445 -21.3 | Romania | ||
| Latin America | (GWh) | 94,694 | 100,297 | 87,247 | -5,603 | -5.6 Latin America | ||
| Total volumes sold | (GWh) | 298,186 | 322,024 | 295,432 | -23,838 | -7.4 | Enel | |
| Electricity volumes sold by geographic area (5) |
||||||||
| Italy | (GWh) | 90,205 | 97,539 | 104,318 | -7,334 | -7.5 | Italy | |
| Iberia | (GWh) | 80,772 | 89,441 | 89,639 | -8,669 | -9.7 | Iberia | |
| Romania | (GWh) | 8,821 | 9,735 | 10,400 | -914 | -9.4 | Romania | |
| Latin America | (GWh) | 118,388 | 104,962 | 91,075 | 13,426 | 12.8 Latin America | ||
| Volumes sold gas (5) | (bn m3) | 9.7 | 10.7 | 11.2 | -1.0 | -9.4 | Enel | |
| Italy | (bn m3) | 4.4 | 4.7 | 4.8 | -0.3 | -7.2 | Italy | |
| - mass market customers | (bn m3) | 2.9 | 3.0 | 3.0 | -0.1 | -2.4 | Italy | |
| - business customers | (bn m3) | 1.5 | 1.8 | 1.8 | -0.3 -15.3 | Italy | ||
| Iberia | (bn m3) | 5.0 | 5.8 | 6.4 | -0.8 -13.0 | Iberia | ||
| Romania | (bn m3) | 0.1 | - | - | 0.1 | - | Romania | |
| Latin America | (bn m3) | 0.2 | 0.2 | - | - | - Latin America | ||
| 102-7 ECONOMIC RESULTS | ||||||||
| Revenues | (mil euros) | 64,985 | 80,327 | 75,575 | -15,343 -19.1 | Enel | ||
| Italy | (mil euros) | 31,267 | 41,779 | 38,398 | -10,512 -25.2 | Italy | ||
| Iberia | (mil euros) | 17,174 | 19,054 | 19,492 | -1,881 | -9.9 | Iberia |
| GRI/ EUSS KPI |
UM | December 2020 December 2019 December 2018 | 2020-2019 | % | Scope | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Latin America | (mil euros) | 13,817 | 16,793 | 14,742 | -2,977 -17.7 Latin America | |||
| Europe | (mil euros) | 2,085 | 2,400 | 2,361 | -314 -13.1 | Europe | ||
| North and | ||||||||
| North America | (mil euros) | 1,367 | 1,469 | 1,438 | -102 | -6.9 | Central America |
|
| Africa, Asia | ||||||||
| Africa, Asia and Oceania | (mil euros) | 153 | 159 | 101 | -6 | -3.8 | and Oceania | |
| Other, eliminations and |
||||||||
| Other, eliminations and adjustments | (mil euros) | -878 | -1,327 | -860 | 449 -33.8 | adjustments | ||
| EBITDA | (mil euros) | 16,816 | 17,704 | 16,351 | -888 | -5.0 | Enel | |
| Italy | (mil euros) | 7,824 | 7,628 | 7,304 | 196 | 2.6 | Italy | |
| Iberia | (mil euros) | 3,775 | 3,792 | 3,558 | -17 | -0.4 | Iberia | |
| Latin America | (mil euros) | 4,063 | 5,303 | 4,543 | -1,240 -23.4 Latin America | |||
| Europe | (mil euros) | 509 | 448 | 516 | 61 | 13.6 | Europe | |
| North America | (mil euros) | 778 | 799 | 535 | -21 | -2.6 North America | ||
| Africa, Asia and Oceania | (mil euros) | 55 | 61 | 54 | -6 | -9.8 | Africa, Asia and Oceania |
|
| Other, eliminations |
||||||||
| and | ||||||||
| Other, eliminations and adjustments | (mil euros) | -188 | -327 | -159 | 139 -42.5 | adjustments | ||
| Italy | (%) | 46.6 | 43.1 | 44.7 | 3.5 | - | Italy | |
| Iberia | (%) | 22.4 | 21.4 | 21.8 | 1.0 | - | Iberia | |
| Latin America | (%) | 24.2 | 30.0 | 27.8 | -5.8 | - Latin America | ||
| Europe | (%) | 3.0 | 2.5 | 3.2 | 0.5 | - | Europe | |
| North America | (%) | 4.6 | 4.5 | 3.3 | 0.1 | - North America | ||
| Africa, Asia and Oceania | (%) | 0.3 | 0.3 | 0.3 | - | - | Africa, Asia and Oceania |
|
| Other, eliminations and |
||||||||
| Other, eliminations and adjustments | (%) | -1.1 | -1.8 | -1.0 | 0.7 | - | adjustments | |
| EBIT | (mil euros) | 8,368 | 6,878 | 9,900 | 1,490 | 21.7 | Enel | |
| EBT | (mil euros) | 5,463 | 4,312 | 8,201 | 1,151 | 26.7 | Enel | |
| Group net income | (mil euros) | 3,622 | 2,174 | 4,789 | 1,448 66.6 | Enel | ||
| 201-2 Creating value for stakeholders | ||||||||
| Revenues | (mil euros) | 64,985 | 80,327 | 75,575 | -15,342 -19.1 | Enel | ||
| External costs | (mil euros) | -212 | 56,022 | 53,833 | -56,234 | - | Enel | |
| Net income/(expenses) from commo dity risk |
(mil euros) | 41,812 | -733 | 532 | 42,545 | - | Enel | |
| Gross global added value continuing operations |
(mil euros) | 22,961 | 23,572 | 22,274 | -611 | -2.6 | Enel | |
| Shareholders | (mil euros) | 3,487 | 3,050 | 2,765 | 437 | 14.3 | Enel | |
| Lenders | (mil euros) | 2,340 | 2,609 | 2,493 | -269 -10.3 | Enel | ||
| Employees | (mil euros) | 4,793 | 4,634 | 4,582 | 159 | 3.4 | Enel | |
| State | (mil euros) | 3,166 | 2,069 | 3,168 | 1,097 53.0 | Enel | ||
| Business system | (mil euros) | 9,175 | 11,210 | 9,266 | -2,035 -18.2 | Enel | ||
| Economic value generated | ||||||||
| Economic value generated directly | ||||||||
| Revenues | (mil euros) | 65,081 | 80,327 | 75,575 | -15,246 -19.0 | Enel | ||
| Economic value distributed | (mil euros) | 56,985 | 66,067 | 63,545 | -9,082 -13.7 | Enel | ||
| Operating costs | (mil euros) | 41,702 | 56,755 | 53,302 | -15,053 -26.5 | Enel | ||
| Personnel and benefit cost | (mil euros) | 3,956 | 4,634 | 4,582 | -678 -14.6 | Enel | ||
| Payment to lenders of capital | (mil euros) | 7,082 | 2,609 | 2,493 | 4,473 | - | Enel | |
| Payments to governments | (mil euros) | 4,245 | 2,069 | 3,168 | 2,176 | - | Enel | |
| Gross added value continuing | ||||||||
| operations | (mil euros) | - | - | - | - | - | Enel |

| GRI/ EUSS KPI |
UM | December 2020 December 2019 December 2018 | 2020-2019 | % | Scope | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Economic value generated | (mil euros) | 8,096 | 14,260 | 12,030 | -6,164 -43.2 | Enel | ||
| Investments | ||||||||
| Investments (6) | (mil euros) | 10,197 | 9,947 | 8,152 | 250 | 2.5 | Enel | |
| Total Italy | (mil euros) | 2,842 | 2,635 | 2,479 | 207 | 7.9 | Italy | |
| Iberia | (mil euros) | 1,638 | 2,020 | 1,433 | -382 -18.9 | Iberia | ||
| Latin America | (mil euros) | 2,859 | 2,632 | 2,259 | 227 | 8.6 Latin America | ||
| Europe | (mil euros) | 411 | 458 | 390 | -47 -10.3 | Europe | ||
| North America | (mil euros) | 1,816 | 1,806 | 1,360 | 10 | 0.6 North America | ||
| Africa, Asia and Oceania | (mil euros) | 417 | 275 | 142 | 142 | 51.6 | Africa, Asia and Oceania |
|
| Total Abroad | (mil euros) | 7,142 | 7,191 | 5,584 | -49 | -0.7 Total Abroad | ||
| Adjustments | (mil euros) | 213 | 121 | 89 | 92 | 76.0 | Enel | |
| Weight of foreign investments | (%) | 70.0 | 72.3 | 68.5 | -2.3 | - | Enel |
(1) In some thermal plants, multiple technology units are present.
(2) New renewable power, excluding disposals and changes in scope, mainly in North, Central and South America. The value does not include managed capacity, the overall value of capacity is 3.1 GW.
(3) The 2019 figures include a more specific determination thereof.
(4) The distributed electricity figure for 2019 takes into account a more precise determination of the quantities transported.
(5) The volumes also include sales to large customers made by generating companies in Latin America; the 2019 figure has been adjusted to standardize data compara-
bility.
(6) The data refers only to continuing operations and therefore do not include the figures for 'assets held for sale'.
| GRI/ EUSS KPI |
UM | December 2020 December 2019 December 2018 | 2020-2019 | % | Scope | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EMISSIONS | ||||||||
| 305-5 Avoided emissions (1) | (mil t) | 74.8 | 77.1 | 78.5 | -2.3 | -3.0 | Enel | |
| 305-1 | Direct greenhouse gas emissions (Scope 1) |
|||||||
| CO2 emissions from the electricity production and heat |
(mil t) | 44.67 | 69.39 | 94.44 | -24.72 -35.6 | Enel | ||
| Other CO2eq emissions due to electricity production and other activities (2) |
(mil teq) | 0.59 | 0.59 | 0.79 | - | - | Enel | |
| of which: emission from losses of SF6 from energy production |
(mil teq) | 0.02 | 0.03 | 0.23 | -0.01 -20.0 | Enel | ||
| of which: emission from losses of SF6 from energy distribution |
(mil teq) | 0.13 | 0.16 | 0.15 | -0.03 -18.8 | Enel | ||
| Total direct emissions (Scope 1) | (mil teq) | 45.26 | 69.98 | 95.23 | -24.72 -35.3 | Enel | ||
| Specific emissions | ||||||||
| Specific CO2 emissions from total net production (3) |
(g/kWh) | 211 | 296 | 369 | -85 -28.7 | Enel | ||
| Specific CO2eq emissions from Scope 1 | (gCO2eq/ kWh) |
214 | 298 | 372 | -84 -28.2 | Enel | ||
| 305-2 | Indirect greenhouse gas emissions (Scope 2) |
|||||||
| Purchased electricity from the grid (4) | ||||||||
| Fuel and stock management | (mil teq) | 0.001 | 0.001 | 0.002 | - | - | Enel | |
| Electricity distribution | (mil teq) | 0.152 | 0.149 | 0.168 | 0.003 | 2.0 | Enel | |
| Real estate | (mil teq) | 0.060 | 0.081 | 0.106 | -0.021 -25.9 | Enel | ||
| Mining | (mil teq) | - | 0.003 | 0.001 | -0.003 -86.7 | Enel | ||
| Energy production (thermal and hydroelectric plant) |
(mil teq) | 1.216 | 1.316 | 1.122 | -0.100 | -7.6 | ||
| Total indirect emissions (Scope 2, location based) |
(mil teq) | 1.430 | 1.547 | 1.399 | -0.118 | -7.6 | Enel | |
| Total indirect emissions (Scope 2, market based) |
(mil teq) | 2.285 | 2.301 | 2.107 | -0.016 | -0.7 | Enel | |
| Distribution and transmission system: energy losses (5) |
||||||||
| Emissions due to energy losses (location based) |
(mil teq) | 3.56 | 3.82 | 3.68 | -0.26 | -6.7 | Enel | |
| Emissions due to energy losses (market based) |
(mil teq) | 5.57 | 6.00 | 5.37 | -0.30 -7.2 | Enel | ||
| 305-3 | Other indirect greenhouse emissions (Scope 3) (6) |
|||||||
| Coal mining | (mil teq) | 1.06 | 3.33 | 5.60 | -2.27 -68.1 | Enel | ||
| Transport of coal by sea | (mil teq) | 0.10 | 0.29 | 0.80 | -0.19 -64.1 | Enel | ||
| Transport of coal by train | (mil teq) | - | 0.22 | 0.33 | -0.22 -100.0 | Enel | ||
| Transport of fuel (gas oil, biomass, WDF) (mil teq) | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.01 | - -11.1 | Enel | |||
| Transport of raw materials and waste | (mil teq) | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.03 | - -64.3 | Enel |

| GRI/ | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EUSS KPI | UM | December 2020 December 2019 December 2018 | 2020-2019 | % | Scope | |||
| End consumers of the purchased electricity |
(mil teq) | 25.04 | 28.98 | 27.39 | -3.94 -13.6 | Enel | ||
| End consumers of the purchased gas | (mil teq) | 21.48 | 23.92 | 25.41 | -2.44 -10.2 | Enel | ||
| Total indirect emissions (Scope 3) | (mil teq) | 47.70 | 56.92 | 59.56 | -9.22 -16.2 | Enel | ||
| 305-7 Other atmospheric emissions (7) | ||||||||
| SO2 emissions |
(t) | 20,547 | 138,264 | 192,796 | -117,717 -85.1 | Enel | ||
| NOx emissions |
(t) | 76,256 | 141,208 | 184,468 | -64,952 -46.0 | Enel | ||
| Dust emissions | (t) | 1,243 | 27,012 | 43,059 | -25,769 -95.4 | Enel | ||
| H2S emissions | (t) | 4,972 | 5,162 | 5,347 | -190 -3.7 | Enel | ||
| Hg emissions | (t) | 0.05 | 0.11 | - | -0.06 | - | Enel | |
| Specific emissions | ||||||||
| SO2 emissions |
(g/kWh) | 0.10 | 0.59 | 0.75 | -0.49 -83.1 | Enel | ||
| NOx emissions |
(g/kWh) | 0.36 | 0.60 | 0.72 | -0.24 -40.0 | Enel | ||
| Dust emissions | (g/kWh) | 0.01 | 0.12 | 0.17 | -0.11 -91.7 | Enel | ||
| 305-6 Ozone Depleting Substances emissions | ||||||||
| (kgCFC | ||||||||
| Total | 11eq) | 22 | 6 | n.a. | 16 | - | Enel | |
| 307-1 Environmental disputes | ||||||||
| Environmental proceedings as defendant |
(n.) | 255 | 177 | 292 | 78 44.1 | Enel | ||
| Monetary value of environmental fines (mil euros) | 84.71 | 70.04 | 12.48 | 14.67 20.9 | Enel | |||
| ENERGY CONSUMPTION | ||||||||
| Fuel consumption by primary source | ||||||||
| 302-1 | in TJ | |||||||
| from non-renewable sources | (TJ) | 949,152 | 1,203,787 | 1,488,072 | -254,635 -21.2 | Enel | ||
| Coal | (TJ) | 138,380 | 371,960 | 634,761 | -233,580 -62.8 | Enel | ||
| Lignite | (TJ) | 1,353 | 9,360 | 18,003 | -8,007 -85.5 | Enel | ||
| Fuel oil | (TJ) | 39,320 | 50,013 | 59,997 | -10,693 -21.4 | Enel | ||
| Natural gas | (TJ) | 457,020 | 425,923 | 481,105 | 31,097 | 7.3 | Enel | |
| Gas oil | (TJ) | 39,234 | 67,489 | 39,272 | -28,255 -41.9 | Enel | ||
| Uranium | (TJ) | 273,845 | 279,042 | 254,934 | -5,197 | -1.9 | Enel | |
| from renewable resources | (TJ) | 54,990 | 54,185 | 58,992 | 715 | 1.3 | Enel | |
| Biomass, biogas and waste | (TJ) | 1,396 | 1,995 | 6,615 | -599 | -30 | Enel | |
| Geothermal fluid | (TJ) | 53,504 | 52,190 | 52,377 | 1,314 | 2.5 | Enel | |
| Total direct consumption | (TJ) | 1,004,052 | 1,257,972 | 1,547,064 | -253,920 -20.2 | Enel | ||
| Fuel consumption by in Mtoe | ||||||||
| from non-renewable sources | (Mtoe) | 22.5 | 28.8 | 35.5 | -6.3 -21.9 | Enel | ||
| Coal | (Mtoe) | 3.3 | 8.9 | 15.2 | -5.6 -62.9 | Enel | ||
| Lignite | (Mtoe) | 0.03 | 0.2 | 0.4 | -0.2 -84.0 | Enel | ||
| Fuel oil | (Mtoe) | 0.9 | 1.2 | 1.4 | -0.3 -25.0 | Enel | ||
| Natural gas | (Mtoe) | 10.9 | 10.2 | 11.5 | 0.7 | 6.9 | Enel | |
| Gas oil | (Mtoe) | 0.9 | 1.6 | 0.9 | -0.7 -46.3 | Enel | ||
| Uranium | (Mtoe) | 6.5 | 6.7 | 6.1 | -0.2 | -2.4 | Enel | |
| from renewable resources | (Mtoe) | 1.4 | 1.3 | 1.5 | 0.1 | 8.0 | Enel | |
| Biomass, biogas and waste | (Mtoe) | 0.05 | 0.05 | 0.2 | - | - | Enel | |
| Geothermal fluid | (Mtoe) | 1.3 | 1.2 | 29.8 | 0.1 | 8.3 | Enel | |
| Total direct consumption | (Mtoe) | 23.9 | 30.1 | 37.0 | -6.2 -20.5 | Enel |
| GRI/ EUSS KPI |
UM | December 2020 December 2019 December 2018 | 2020-2019 | % | Scope | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Incidence of fuel consumption from non-renewable sources |
||||||||
| Coal | (%) | 14.6 | 30.9 | 42.7 | -16.3 | - | Enel | |
| Lignite | (%) | 0.1 | 0.7 | 1.2 | -0.6 | - | Enel | |
| Fuel oil | (%) | 4.1 | 4.2 | 4.0 | -0.1 | - | Enel | |
| Natural gas | (%) | 48.2 | 35.4 | 32.3 | 12.8 | - | Enel | |
| Gas oil | (%) | 4.0 | 5.6 | 2.6 | -1.6 | - | Enel | |
| Uranium | (%) | 28.9 | 23.3 | 17.1 | 5.6 | - | Enel | |
| 302-1 | Indirect energy consumption by destination |
|||||||
| Fuel and stock management | (TJ) | 10 | 19 | 30 | -9 -48.6 | Enel | ||
| Electricity production | (TJ) | 20,124 | 15,161 | 9,953 | 4,963 32.7 | |||
| Electricity distribution | (TJ) | 2,197 | 1,917 | 2,107 | 280 | 14.6 | Enel | |
| Real estate | (TJ) | 808 | 1,154 | 1,558 | -346 -30.0 | Enel | ||
| Mining | (TJ) | 6 | 4 | 6 | 2 45.0 | Enel | ||
| Total energy consumption | (TJ) | 23,145 | 18,255 | 13,654 | 4,889 26.8 | Enel | ||
| RAW MATERIALS | ||||||||
| Resources used in the production process |
||||||||
| 301-1 | Fuel consumption for thermoelectric production |
|||||||
| from non-renewable sources | ||||||||
| Coal | (,000 t) | 5,893 | 18,483 | 31,105 | -12,590 -68.1 | Enel | ||
| Lignite | (,000 t) | 105 | 730 | 1,344 | -625 -85.6 | Enel | ||
| Fuel oil | (,000 t) | 975 | 1,246 | 1,488 | -271 -21.7 | Enel | ||
| Natural gas | (Mm3) | 13,075 | 13,513 | 13,080 | -438 | -3.2 | Enel | |
| Gas oil | (,000 t) | 906 | 1,601 | 929 | -695 -43.4 | Enel | ||
| from renewable resources | ||||||||
| Biomass and waste for thermoelectric production |
(,000 t) | 89 | 131 | 574 | -42 -32.1 | Enel | ||
| Biogas | (Mm3) | 0.1 | 1.3 | 1.2 | -1.2 -92.3 | Enel | ||
| Geothermal steam used for electricity production (8) |
(,000 t) | 350,090 | 109,891 | 53,548 | 240,199 | - | Enel | |
| 301-1 Consumables | ||||||||
| Lime | (,000 t) | 83.9 | 295.5 | 576.1 | -280.6 -94.9 | Enel | ||
| Ammonia | (,000 t) | 16.1 | 20.3 | 26.0 | -4.2 -20.7 | Enel | ||
| Caustic soda | (,000 t) | 76.9 | 79.6 | 83.0 | -2.7 | -3.4 | Enel | |
| Slaked lime | (,000 t) | 3.8 | 5.0 | 15.3 | -1.2 -24.0 | Enel | ||
| Sulfuric/chloride acid | (,000 t) | 7.5 | 9.2 | 11.6 | -1.7 -18.5 | Enel | ||
| Other | (,000 t) | 17.6 | 46.0 | 52.3 | -28.4 -61.7 | Enel | ||
| Total | (,000 t) | 205.8 | 455.6 | 764.3 | -249.8 -54.8 | Enel | ||
| Percentage of materials used that derive from recycled material compared to total consumption of |
||||||||
| 301-2 | each resource | |||||||
| Lubricant oil | (%) | 3.8 | 14.9 | 4.0 | -11.1 | - | Enel | |
| Dielectric oil | (%) | 28.6 | 63.5 | 56.9 | -34.9 | - | Enel | |
| Ferric chloride | (%) | - | - | 3.9 | - | - | Enel | |
| Paper for printing | (%) | 76.0 | 75.0 | 0.4 | 1.0 | - | Enel |

| GRI/ | |
|---|---|
| EUSS KPI | UM | December 2020 December 2019 December 2018 | 2020-2019 | % | Scope | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Water | ||||||||
| Volumes of water used by production process |
||||||||
| By thermoelectric production | (Mm3) | 49.1 | 74.9 | 94.5 | -25.8 -34.4 | Enel | ||
| By nuclear production | (Mm3) | 1.7 | 1.9 | 1.7 | -0.2 -10.5 | Enel | ||
| By other industrial uses | (Mm3) | 0.7 | 0.5 | 0.1 | 0.2 42.9 | Enel | ||
| Total water withdrawal | (Mm3) | 51.5 | 77.3 | 96.3 | -25.8 -33.4 | Enel | ||
| Water requirements by production process (9) |
(l/kWheq) | 0.20 | 0.33 | 0.38 | -0.13 -39.4 | Enel | ||
| 303-3 Water withdrawal by source (10) | ||||||||
| Withdrawal from scarce source: | (Mm3) | 36.9 | 63.7 | 84.4 | -26.8 -42.1 | Enel | ||
| Surface water (wetlands, lakes, rivers) total |
(Mm3) | 22.3 | 44.3 | 64.2 | -22.0 -49.7 | Enel | ||
| - freshwater (≤ 1,000 mg/l Total Dissolved Solids) |
(Mm3) | 22.0 | 44.2 | - | -22.2 -50.3 | Enel | ||
| - other water (> 1,000 mg/l Total Dissolved Solids) |
(Mm3) | 0.3 | - | - | 0.3 | - | Enel | |
| Ground water (from wells) total | (Mm3) | 9.0 | 11.9 | 12.2 | -2.9 -24.3 | Enel | ||
| - freshwater (≤ 1,000 mg/l Total Dissolved Solids) |
(Mm3) | 9.0 | 11.9 | - | -2.9 -24.4 | Enel | ||
| - other water (> 1,000 mg/l Total Dissolved Solids) |
(Mm3) | - | - | - | - | - | Enel | |
| Water from aqueduct total | (Mm3) | 5.7 | 7.5 | 8.0 | -1.8 -23.8 | Enel | ||
| - freshwater (≤ 1,000 mg/l Total Dissolved Solids) |
(Mm3) | 4.8 | 7.0 | - | -2.2 -31.4 | Enel | ||
| - other water (> 1,000 mg/l Total Dissolved Solids) |
(Mm3) | 0.9 | 0.5 | - | 0.4 80.0 | Enel | ||
| Withdrawal from non scarce source: | (Mm3) | 14.6 | 13.6 | 11.9 | 1.0 | 7.0 | Enel | |
| Sea water (used as is and dissalated) | (Mm3) | 14.5 | 6.4 | 7.4 | 8.1 | - | Enel | |
| - freshwater (≤ 1,000 mg/l Total Dissolved Solids) |
(Mm3) | - | 3.6 | - | -3.6 -100.0 | Enel | ||
| - other water (> 1,000 mg/l Total Dissolved Solids) |
(Mm3) | 14.5 | 2.8 | - | 11.7 | - | Enel | |
| from produced water (amount used inside plants) |
(Mm3) | 0.1 | 7.2 | 4.5 | -7.1 -99.3 | Enel | ||
| Total | (Mm3) | 51.5 | 77.3 | 96.3 | -25.8 -33.4 | Enel | ||
| Percentage of recycled and reused water |
(%) | 9.7 | 9.3 | 4.7 | 0.4 | 4.1 | Enel | |
| Water used for once through cooling system |
||||||||
| Total | (Mm3) | 14,403.8 | 17,876.3 | 17,062.2 | -3,472.5 -19.4 | Enel | ||
| from surface water | (Mm3) | 5,281.3 | 7,395.1 | - | -2,113.8 -28.6 | Enel | ||
| from sea water | (Mm3) | 9,122.5 | 10,481.2 | - | -1,358.7 -13.0 | Enel | ||
| 303-3 Total withdrawals | (Mm3) | 14,455.3 | 17,953.6 | 17,158.5 | -3,498.3 -19.5 | Enel | ||
| 303-3 | Water withdrawal by source in "water stressed" areas (11) |
|||||||
| Withdrawal from scarce source: | (Mm3) | 11.0 | 18.1 | - | -7.1 -39.2 | Enel | ||
| Surface water (wetlands, lakes, rivers) total |
(Mm3) | 5.4 | 10.2 | - | -4.8 -46.9 | Enel | ||
| - freshwater (≤ 1,000 mg/l Total Dissolved Solids) |
(Mm3) | 5.4 | 10.2 | - | -4.8 -46.9 | Enel | ||
| - other water (> 1,000 mg/l Total Dissolved Solids) |
(Mm3) | - | - | - | - | - | Enel |
Ground water (from wells) total (Mm3) 4.9 5.9 - -1.1 -18.2 Enel
| GRI/ EUSS KPI |
UM | December 2020 December 2019 December 2018 | 2020-2019 | % | Scope | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| - freshwater (≤ 1,000 mg/l Total Dissolved Solids) |
(Mm3) | 4.9 | 5.9 | - | -1.0 -17.8 | Enel | ||
| - other water (> 1,000 mg/l Total Dissolved Solids) |
(Mm3) | - | - | - | - | - | Enel | |
| Water from aqueduct total | (Mm3) | 0.8 | 2.0 | - | -1.2 -62.5 | Enel | ||
| - freshwater (≤ 1,000 mg/l Total Dissolved Solids) |
(Mm3) | 0.5 | 2.0 | - | -1.5 -75.0 | Enel | ||
| - other water (> 1,000 mg/l Total Dissolved Solids) |
(Mm3) | 0.3 | - | - | 0.3 | - | Enel | |
| Withdrawal from non scarce source | (Mm3) | 0.8 | 1.5 | - | -0.7 -45.7 | Enel | ||
| Sea water (used as is and dissalated) | (Mm3) | 0.8 | 1.2 | - | -0.4 -33.3 | Enel | ||
| - freshwater (≤ 1,000 mg/l Total Dissolved Solids) |
(Mm3) | - | - | - | - | - | Enel | |
| - other water (> 1,000 mg/l Total Dissolved Solids) |
(Mm3) | 0.8 | 1.2 | - | -0.4 -33.3 | Enel | ||
| from produced water (amount used inside plants) |
(Mm3) | - | 0.3 | - | -0.3 -95.4 | Enel | ||
| Total | (Mm3) | 11.8 | 19.6 | - | -7.8 -39.7 | Enel | ||
| 303-4 WATER DISCHARGE | ||||||||
| Water discharge by destination | (Mm3) | 14,433.7 | 17,895.5 | 17,109.8 | -3,461.8 -19.3 | Enel | ||
| Surface water (wetlands, lakes, rivers) | (Mm3) | 5,275.1 | 7,388.6 | - | -2,113.5 -28.6 | Enel | ||
| Groundwater | (Mm3) | 1.1 | - | - | 1.1 | - | Enel | |
| Water in municipal/industrial treatment plants |
(Mm3) | 8.6 | 12.5 | - | -3.9 -31.5 | Enel | ||
| Third party water | (Mm3) | 89.0 | 12.10 | - | 76.9 | - | Enel | |
| Seawater | (Mm3) | 9,059.90 | 10,482.30 | - | -1,422.4 -13.6 | Enel | ||
| 303-5 Water Consuptions | (Mm3) | 20.4 | 58.1 | 48.7 | -37.7 -64.9 | Enel | ||
| 306-3 WASTE PRODUCED (12) | ||||||||
| Non-hazardous waste | (t) | 1,129,544 | 5,644,685 | 8,846,150 | -4,515,141 -80.0 | Enel | ||
| Hazardous waste | (t) | 51,816 | 50,332 | 150,673 | 1,484 | 2.9 | Enel | |
| Total waste produced | (t) | 1,181,360 | 5,695,017 | 8,996,823 | -4,513,657 -79.3 | Enel | ||
| of which: ash and gypsum | (t) | 801,726 | 5,035,698 | - | -4,233,972 -84.1 | Enel | ||
| of which: oils | (t) | 8,904 | 12,696 | - | -3,792 -29.9 | Enel | ||
| of which: costruction and demolition waste |
(t) | 117,889 | 209,799 | - | -91,910 -43.8 | Enel | ||
| Total waste sent for recovery | (%) | 65.7 | 24.0 | 22.9 | 41.7 | - | Enel | |
| Hazardous waste by disposal method | ||||||||
| Recycled or sent for recovery | (t) | 25,183 | 28,324 | 15,413 | -3,141 -11.1 | Enel | ||
| Landfill | (t) | 9,348 | 11,366 | 135,260 | -2,018 -17.8 | Enel | ||
| Incineration and other disposal | ||||||||
| methods | (t) | 17,285 | 10,642 | - | 6,643 62.4 | Enel | ||
| Total | (t) | 51,816 | 50,332 | 150,673 | 1,484 | 2.9 | Enel | |
| Non-hazardous waste by disposal method |
||||||||
| Recovery (including energy recovery) | (t) | 750,946 | 1,336,684 | 2,047,476 | -585,738 -43.8 | Enel | ||
| Landfill | (t) | 336,499 | 4,027,118 | 6,798,674 | -3,690,619 -91.6 | Enel | ||
| Incineration and other disposal methods | (t) | 42,099 | 280,883 | - | -238,784 -85.0 | Enel | ||
| Total | (t) | 1,129,544 | 5,644,685 | 8,846,150 | -4,515,140 -80.0 | Enel |

(1) The resulting value is the product of the generation of electricity obtained from a renewable or nuclear source and the specific CO2 emissions from the thermoelectric generation of the country in which Enel is present (source: Enerdata, http://enerdata.net).
(2) This quota includes directed CO2 emissions of auxiliary motors - energy production and emissions of N2 O, CH4, NF3, SF6 and refrigerant gases expressed in CO2 equivalent.
(3) This indicator is calculated as the ratio between total emissions from thermoelectric generation and the total from renewable, nuclear and thermoelectric generation (including the contribution of heat in MWheq).
| KPI | UM | 2020 | Scope |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hazardous waste by significant geographical area | |||
| Italy | (t) | 28,116 | Italy |
| Iberia | (t) | 11,116 | Iberia |
| South America | (t) | 7,218 | Latin America |
| Chile | (t) | 408 | Chile |
| Argentina | (t) | 1,307 | Argentina |
| Colombia | (t) | 878 | Colombia |
| Peru | (t) | 741 | Peru |
| Brazil | (t) | 3,884 | Brazil |
| Europe | (t) | 5,225 | Europe |
| Russia | (t) | 2,660 | Russia |
| Romania | (t) | 2,550 | Romania |
| Greece | (t) | 14 | Greece |
| Bulgaria | (t) | 1 | Bulgaria |
| Non-hazardous waste by significant geographical area | |||
| Italy | (t) | 627,886 | Italy |
| Iberia | (t) | 203,922 | Iberia |
| South America | (t) | 279,854 | Latin America |
| Chile | (t) | 138,464 | Chile |
| Argentina | (t) | 11,119 | Argentina |
| Colombia | (t) | 6,668 | Colombia |
| Peru | (t) | 33,016 | Peru |
| Brazil | (t) | 90,588 | Brazil |
| Europe | (t) | 15,567 | Europe |
| Russia | (t) | 11,121 | Russia |
| Romania | (t) | 4,440.0 | Romania |
| Greece | (t) | 2 | Greece |
| Bulgaria | (t) | 3 | Bulgaria |
| GRI/ EUSS KPI |
UM | December 2020 December 2019 December 2018 | 2020-2019 | % | Scope | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mitigation of the impact on the landscape/territory (13) |
||||||||
| LV/MV cabling ratio | (%) | 60.4 | 60.1 | 60.0 | 0.3 | - | Enel | |
| LV cabling ratio | (%) | 82.4 | 82.2 | 82.0 | 0.2 | - | Enel | |
| MV cabling ratio | (%) | 29.4 | 29.1 | 28.5 | 0.3 | - | Enel |
(12) The values of non-hazardous waste for 2019 have been reclassified according to a different calculation methodology. With regard to waste production, the table below shows the 2019 figures by significant geographical area only.
(13) The cabling ratio is calculated by proportioning the km of cabled lines (both underground and aerial insulated cables) to the total km of lines. The increase in the cabling ratio over the years is due to a general increase, in terms of length, of aerial and underground cable sections at the expense of the bare conductor line.

| GRI/ EUSS KPI |
UM | December 2020 December 2019 December 2018 | 2020-2019 | % | Scope | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Customers Chile | (no.) | 8 | 8 | - | - | - | Chile | |
| Customers Colombia | (no.) | 15 | 25 | - | -10 -40.0 | Colombia | ||
| Total customers gas market | (no.) | 5,793,472 | 5,856,569 | 5,735,139 | -63,097 | -1.1 | Enel | |
| Total customers Enel electricity and gas (no.) | 69,517,932 | 70,471,612 | 71,117,743 | -953,680 | -1.4 | Enel | ||
| PUBLIC LIGHTING | ||||||||
| Customers public lighting | (no.) | 3,006 | 3,071 | 3,194 | -65 | -2.1 | Italy | |
| Light sources public lighting | (,000) | 2,724 | 2,424 | 2,467 | 300 | 12.4 | Italy | |
| ENERGY AVAILABILITY AND REALIABILITY |
||||||||
| EU11 Efficiency thermoelectric generation (2) | ||||||||
| Average thermoelectric generation yield without heat component |
(%) | 44.2 | 42.0 | 40.1 | 2.2 | - | Enel | |
| Average thermoelectric generation yield with heat |
(%) | 45.4 | 43.1 | 41.1 | 2.3 | - | Enel | |
| Average yield by technology without heat component |
||||||||
| Yield coal plants | (%) | 35.2 | 36.1 | 36.2 | -0.9 | - | Enel | |
| Yield oil/gas plants | (%) | 36.3 | 36.4 | 36.7 | -0.1 | - | Enel | |
| Yield CCGT plants | (%) | 53.5 | 53.0 | 53.1 | 0.5 | - | Enel | |
| Average yield with heat component by technology |
||||||||
| Yield coal plants | (%) | 35.2 | 36.3 | 36.4 | -1.1 | - | Enel | |
| Yield oil/gas plants | (%) | 40.3 | 40.8 | 40.6 | -0.5 | - | Enel | |
| Yield CCGT plants | (%) | 53.7 | 53.1 | 53.3 | 0.6 | - | Enel | |
| EU30 | Availability of thermoelectric generation by geographic area |
|||||||
| Average availability thermoelectric generation Italy |
(%) | 84.4 | 86.9 | 86.7 | -2.5 | - | Italy | |
| Average availability thermoelectric generation Russia |
(%) | 85.8 | 86.0 | 86.7 | -0.2 | - | Russia | |
| Average availability thermoelectric generation Iberia |
(%) | 86.3 | 91.4 | 93.0 | -5.1 | - | Iberia | |
| Average availability thermoelectric generation Chile |
(%) | 95.4 | 92.3 | 91.5 | 3.1 | - | Chile | |
| Average availability thermoelectric generation Argentina |
(%) | 86.1 | 84.1 | 74.6 | 2.0 | - | Argentina | |
| Average availability thermoelectric generation Brazil |
(%) | 99.2 | 95.3 | 100.0 | 3.9 | - | Brazil | |
| Average availability thermoelectric generation Peru |
(%) | 90.8 | 88.7 | 88.6 | 2.1 | - | Peru | |
| Average availability thermoelectric generation Colombia |
(%) | 81.7 | 80.6 | 84.6 | 1.1 | - | Colombia | |
| EU28 Service interruptions - frequency (SAIFI) (3) | ||||||||
| Frequency of interruptions by customer Italy |
(no.) | 1.7 | 1.9 | 1.8 | -0.2 -10.5 | Italy | ||
| Frequency of interruptions by customer Romania |
(no.) | 3.4 | 4.1 | 3.8 | -0.7 -17.1 | Romania | ||
| Frequency of interruptions by customer Iberia |
(no.) | 1.4 | 1.4 | 1.6 | - | - | Iberia | |
| Frequency of interruptions by customer Peru |
(no.) | 2.6 | 2.8 | 2.8 | -0.2 | -7.1 | Peru | |
| Frequency of interruptions by customer Chile |
(no.) | 1.5 | 1.6 | 1.5 | -0.1 | -6.3 | Chile | |
| Frequency of interruptions by customer Argentina |
(no.) | 4.5 | 6.0 | 6.7 | -1.5 -25.0 | Argentina | ||
| Frequency of interruptions by customer Brazil (Ampla) |
(no.) | 6.1 | 8.0 | 7.7 | -1.9 -23.8 | Brazil | ||
| Frequency of interruptions by customer Brazil (Coelce) |
(no.) | 6.0 | 5.4 | 4.4 | 0.6 | 11.1 | Brazil |

| GRI/ EUSS KPI |
UM | December 2020 December 2019 December 2018 | 2020-2019 | % | Scope | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EU3 | CUSTOMERS | |||||||
| 102-6 | Electricity market (Final number of customers) |
|||||||
| Customers Italy | (no.) | 22,612,004 | 23,689,113 | 25,152,279 | -1,077,109 | -4.5 | Italy | |
| Free market | (no.) | 9,478,660 | 9,243,826 | 8,563,028 | 234,834 | 2.5 | Italy | |
| - business to consumer customers | (no.) | 7,619,859 | 7,437,948 | 6,806,450 | 181,911 | 2.4 | Italy | |
| - business to business customers | (no.) | 1,836,442 | 1,780,278 | 1,722,745 | 56,164 | 3.2 | Italy | |
| - customers in protected categories | (no.) | 22,359 | 25,600 | 33,833 | -3,241 -12.7 | Italy | ||
| Regulated market | (no.) | 13,133,344 | 14,445,287 | 16,589,251 | -1,311,943 | -9.1 | Italy | |
| Customers Iberia | (no.) | 10,420,495 | 10,634,958 | 10,753,670 | -214,463 | -2.0 | Iberia | |
| Free market | (no.) | 5,654,659 | 5,786,083 | 5,678,750 | -131,424 | -2.3 | Iberia | |
| Regulated market | (no.) | 4,765,836 | 4,848,875 | 5,074,920 | -83,039 | -1.7 | Iberia | |
| Customers Latin America (1) | (no.) | 27,642,485 | 27,218,027 | 26,460,146 | 424,458 | 1.6 Latin America | ||
| Free market | (no.) | 5,047 | 4,100 | 844 | 947 | 23.1 Latin America | ||
| Regulated market | (no.) | 27,637,438 | 27,213,927 | 26,459,302 | 423,511 | 1.6 Latin America | ||
| Customers Latin America - Argentina | (no.) | 2,507,652 | 2,490,449 | 2,529,953 | 17,203 | 0.7 | Argentina | |
| Free market | (no.) | - | - | - | - | - | Argentina | |
| Regulated market | (no.) | 2,507,652 | 2,490,449 | 2,529,953 | 17,203 | 0.7 | Argentina | |
| Customers Latin America - Brazil | (no.) | 18,063,146 | 17,786,844 | 17,143,979 | 276,302 | 1.6 | Brazil | |
| Free market | (no.) | 1,488 | 720 | - | - | - | Brazil | |
| Regulated market | (no.) | 18,061,658 | 17,786,124 | 17,143,979 | 275,534 | 1.5 | Brazil | |
| Customers Latin America - Chile | (no.) | 2,008,812 | 1,973,612 | 1,924,986 | 35,200 | 1.8 | Chile | |
| Free market | (no.) | 1,567 | 1,394 | 465 | - | - | Chile | |
| Regulated market | (no.) | 2,007,245 | 1,972,218 | 1,924,521 | 35,027 | 1.8 | Chile | |
| Customers Latin America - Colombia | (no.) | 3,611,245 | 3,532,166 | 3,438,620 | 79,079 | 2.2 | Colombia | |
| Free market | (no.) | 1,295 | 1,266 | - | - | - | Colombia | |
| Regulated market | (no.) | 3,609,950 | 3,530,900 | 3,438,620 | 79,050 | 2.2 | Colombia | |
| Customers Latin America - Peru | (no.) | 1,451,630 | 1,434,956 | 1,422,608 | 16,674 | 1.2 | Peru | |
| Free market | (no.) | 697 | 720 | 379 | -23 | -3.2 | Peru | |
| Regulated market (1) | (no.) | 1,450,933 | 1,434,236 | 1,422,229 | 16,697 | 1.2 | Peru | |
| Customers Romania | (no.) | 3,049,476 | 3,072,945 | 3,016,509 | -23,469 | -0.8 | Romania | |
| Free market | (no.) | 2,233,037 | 2,122,646 | 1,734,123 | 110,391 | 5.2 | Romania | |
| Regulated market | (no.) | 816,439 | 950,299 | 1,282,386 | -133,860 -14.1 | Romania | ||
| Total Customers Enel | (no.) | 63,724,460 | 64,615,043 | 65,382,604 | -890,583 | -1.4 | Enel | |
| Free market | (no.) | 17,371,403 | 17,156,655 | 15,976,745 | 214,748 | 1.3 | Enel | |
| Regulated market | (no.) | 46,353,057 | 47,458,388 | 49,405,859 | -1,105,331 | -2.3 | Enel | |
| Gas market (Final number of customers) | ||||||||
| Customers Italy | (no.) | 4,060,646 | 4,155,689 | 4,088,716 | -95,043 | -2.3 | Italy | |
| Customers Iberia | (no.) | 1,673,424 | 1,648,705 | 1,603,721 | 24,719 | 1.5 | Iberia | |
| Customers Romania | (no.) | 59,379 | 52,142 | 42,702 | 7,237 | 13.9 | Romania |
| GRI/ EUSS KPI |
UM | December 2020 December 2019 December 2018 | 2020-2019 | % | Scope | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Frequency of interruptions by customer Brazil (CELG) |
(no.) | 8.5 | 9.7 | 12.3 | -1.2 -12.4 | Brazil | ||
| Frequency of interruptions by customer Brazil (ELPL) |
(no.) | 3.6 | 3.5 | 4.3 | 0.1 | 2.9 | Brazil | |
| Frequency of interruptions by customer Colombia |
(no.) | 5.6 | 6.8 | 9.0 | -1.2 -17.6 | Colombia | ||
| EU29 | Service interruptions - duration (SAIDI) (3) |
|||||||
| Service continuity index Italy | (min) | 42 | 49 | 47 | -7 -14.3 | Italy | ||
| Service continuity index Romania | (min) | 135 | 170 | 174 | -35 -20.6 | Romania | ||
| Service continuity index Iberia | (min) | 75 | 76 | 80 | -1 | -1.3 | Iberia | |
| Service continuity index Peru | (min) | 419 | 419 | 436 | - | - | Peru | |
| Service continuity index Chile | (min) | 171 | 184 | 178 | -13 | -7.1 | Chile | |
| Service continuity index Argentina | (min) | 839 | 1,214 | 1,485 | -375 -30.9 | Argentina | ||
| Service continuity index Brazil (Ampla) | (min) | 631 | 793 | 833 | -162 -20.4 | Brazil | ||
| Service continuity index Brazil (Coelce) | (min) | 953 | 832 | 522 | 121 | 14.5 | Brazil | |
| Service continuity index Brazil (CELG) | (min) | 953 | 1,349 | 1,538 | -396 -29.4 | Brazil | ||
| Service continuity index Brazil (ELPL) | (min) | 443 | 375 | 429 | 68 | 18.1 | Brazil | |
| Service continuity index Brazil Colombia (min) | 467 | 667 | 710 | -200 -30.0 | Colombia | |||
| EU12 Grid losses (3) | ||||||||
| Grid losses Italy | (%) | 4.9 | 4.7 | 4.7 | 0.2 | - | Italy | |
| Grid losses Romania | (%) | 9.2 | 9.7 | 9.8 | -0.5 | - | Romania | |
| Grid losses Iberia | (%) | 7.1 | 7.5 | 7.5 | -0.4 | - | Iberia | |
| Grid losses Peru | (%) | 8.8 | 8.2 | 7.9 | 0.6 | - | Peru | |
| Grid losses Chile | (%) | 5.2 | 5.0 | 5.0 | 0.2 | - | Chile | |
| Grid losses Argentina | (%) | 19.0 | 15.5 | 14.9 | 3.5 | - | Argentina | |
| Grid losses Brazil (Ampla) | (%) | 22.1 | 22.5 | 21.0 | -0.4 | - | Brazil | |
| Grid losses Brazil (Coelce) | (%) | 15.9 | 14.0 | 13.9 | 1.9 | - | Brazil | |
| Grid losses Brazil (CELG) | (%) | 11.4 | 12.3 | 11.6 | -0.9 | - | Brazil | |
| Grid losses Brazil (ELPL) | (%) | 10.6 | 9.6 | 9.5 | 1.0 | - | Brazil | |
| Grid losses Colombia | (%) | 7.6 | 7.7 | 7.7 | -0.1 | - | Colombia | |
| SERVICE QUALITY | ||||||||
| ELECTRICITY MARKET ITALY | ||||||||
| 102-43; | 102-44 Customer satisfaction | |||||||
| Regulated market | ||||||||
| Customer Satisfaction Index (4) | (i) | 93.8 | 92.4 | 92.4 | 1.4 | 1.5 | Italy | |
| Frequency of surveys | (no.) | 1 | 1 | 1 | - | - | Italy | |
| Written complaints and information | ||||||||
| requests | (,000) | 88.3 | 109.4 | 108.5 | -21.1 -19.3 | Italy | ||
| Response time to written complaints | (dd) | 25.0 | 31.1 | 20.9 | -6.1 -19.6 | Italy | ||
| Free market | ||||||||
| Customer Satisfaction Index (4) | (i) | 91.9 | 90.2 | 90.2 | 1.7 | 1.9 | Italy | |
| Frequency of surveys | (no.) | 1 | 1 | 1 | - | - | Italy | |
| Written complaints and information requests |
(,000) | 113.0 | 92.3 | 70.2 | 20.7 | 22.4 | Italy | |
| Response time to written complaints | (dd) | 14.0 | 31.3 | 14.3 | -17.3 -55.3 | Italy |
| GRI/ EUSS KPI |
UM | December 2020 December 2019 December 2018 | 2020-2019 | % | Scope | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ELECTRICITY MARKET ROMANIA | ||||||||
| Customer satisfaction | ||||||||
| Regulated market | ||||||||
| Customer Satisfaction Index (5) | (i) | 8.4 | 89.0 | 86.0 | - | - | Romania | |
| Written complaints and information requests |
(,000) | - | 100.0 | 80.0 | -100.0 -100.0 | Romania | ||
| Response time to written complaints | (dd) | 30.0 | 62.0 | 15.0 | -32.0 -51.6 | Romania | ||
| Free market | ||||||||
| Customer Satisfaction Index (5) | (i) | 8.2 | 85.0 | 87.0 | - | - | Romania | |
| Written complaints and information | ||||||||
| requests | (,000) | 355.0 | 284.0 | 117.0 | 71.0 | 25.0 | Romania | |
| Response time to written complaints | (dd) | 30.0 | 83.0 | 16.0 | -53.0 -63.9 | Romania | ||
| ELECTRICITY MARKET IBERIA | ||||||||
| Customer satisfaction | ||||||||
| Regulated market (ex TUR market ) | ||||||||
| Customer Satisfaction Index (6) | (i) | 7.7 | 7.2 | 7.2 | 0.5 | 7.1 | Iberia | |
| Written complaints and information requests |
(,000) | 8.2 | 6.4 | 8.3 | 1.8 | 28.1 | Iberia | |
| Response time to written complaints | (dd) | 6.0 | 6.8 | 9.1 | -0.8 -11.8 | Iberia | ||
| Free market (ex TUR market ) | ||||||||
| Customer Satisfaction Index (6) | (i) | 7.3 | 7.3 | 7.2 | - | - | Iberia | |
| Written complaints and information requests |
(,000) | 4.6 | 12.5 | 12.9 | -7.9 -63.5 | Iberia | ||
| Response time to written complaints | (dd) | 7.5 | 18.1 | 21.1 | -10.6 -58.6 | Iberia | ||
| GAS MARKET ITALY | ||||||||
| Customer satisfaction Gas | ||||||||
| Written complaints and information requests |
(,000) | 40.8 | 49.7 | 39.5 | -8.9 -17.9 | Italy | ||
| Response time to written complaints | (dd) | 15.0 | 36.8 | 14.9 | -21.8 -59.2 | Italy | ||
| GAS MARKET IBERIA | ||||||||
| Customer satisfaction Gas | ||||||||
| Written complaints and information requests |
(,000) | 2.3 | 3.0 | 2.9 | -0.7 -22.0 | Iberia | ||
| Response time to written complaints | (dd) | 7.5 | 18.4 | 22.3 | -10.9 -59.2 | Iberia | ||
| GAS MARKET ROMANIA | ||||||||
| Customer satisfaction Gas | ||||||||
| Written complaints and information requests |
(,000) | 9.5 | 17.0 | 9.0 | -7.5 -44.1 | Romania | ||
| Response time to written complaints | (dd) | 18.0 | 97.0 | 17.0 | -79.0 -81.4 | Romania | ||
| EU27 ACCESSIBILITY OF ENERGY | ||||||||
| Customers disconnected for non payment Italyn market |
||||||||
| by time from disconnection to payment - Italy (Regulated market) |
(no.) | 201,288 | - | - | - | - | Italy | |
| < 48 h | (no.) | 109,170 | - | - | - | - | Italy | |
| 48 h - 1 week | (no.) | 46,652 | - | - | - | - | Italy | |
| 1 week - 1 month | (no.) | 45,123 | - | - | - | - | Italy | |
| 1 month - 1 year | (no.) | 343 | - | - | - | - | Italy | |
| > 1 year | (no.) | - | - | - | - | - | Italy | |
| by time from payment to reconnection - Italy (Regulated market) |
(no.) | 201,288 | - | - | - | - | Italy | |
| < 24 h | (no.) | 185,090 | - | - | - | - | Italy | |
| 24 h - 1 week | (no.) | 15,799 | - | - | - | - | Italy | |

| GRI/ EUSS KPI |
UM | December 2020 December 2019 December 2018 | 2020-2019 | % | Scope | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| > 1 week | (no.) | 399 | - | - | - | - | Italy | |
| by time from disconnection to payment - Italy (Free market) |
(no.) | 381,435 | - | - | - | - | Italy | |
| < 48 h | (no.) | 203,228 | - | - | - | - | Italy | |
| 48 h - 1 week | (no.) | 74,688 | - | - | - | - | Italy | |
| 1 week - 1 month | (no.) | 95,630 | - | - | - | - | Italy | |
| 1 month - 1 year | (no.) | 7,889 | - | - | - | - | Italy | |
| > 1 year | (no.) | - | - | - | - | - | Italy | |
| by time from payment to reconnection - Italy (Free market) |
(no.) | 381,435 | - | - | - | - | Italy | |
| < 24 h | (no.) | 379,565 | - | - | - | - | Italy | |
| 24 h - 1 week | (no.) | 1,855 | - | - | - | - | Italy | |
| > 1 week | (no.) | 15 | - | - | - | - | Italy | |
| by time from disconnection to | ||||||||
| payment - Italy (Gas market) | (no.) | 59,923 | - | - | - | - | Italy | |
| < 48 h | (no.) | 14,140 | - | - | - | - | Italy | |
| 48 h - 1 week | (no.) | 20,840 | - | - | - | - | Italy | |
| 1 week - 1 month | (no.) | 21,579 | - | - | - | - | Italy | |
| 1 month - 1 year | (no.) | 3,364 | - | - | - | - | Italy | |
| > 1 year | (no.) | - | - | - | - | - | Italy | |
| by time from payment to reconnection - Italy (Gas market) |
(no.) | 59,923 | - | - | - | - | Italy | |
| < 24 h | (no.) | 56,425 | - | - | - | - | Italy | |
| 24 h - 1 week | (no.) | 3,471 | - | - | - | - | Italy | |
| > 1 week | (no.) | 27 | - | - | - | - | Italy | |
| Regulated market - Romania | ||||||||
| by time from disconnection to payment - Romania (Regulated market) (no.) |
4,280 | - | - | - | - | Romania | ||
| < 48 h | (no.) | 1,338 | - | - | - | - | Romania | |
| 48 h - 1 week | (no.) | 321 | - | - | - | - | Romania | |
| 1 week - 1 month | (no.) | 345 | - | - | - | - | Romania | |
| 1 month - 1 year | (no.) | 1,032 | - | - | - | - | Romania | |
| > 1 year | (no.) | 1,244 | - | - | - | - | Romania | |
| by time from payment to reconnection - Romania (Regulated market) |
(no.) | 3,036 | - | - | - | - | Romania | |
| < 24 h | (no.) | 2,286 | - | - | - | - | Romania | |
| 24 h - 1 week | (no.) | 685 | - | - | - | - | Romania | |
| > 1 week | (no.) | 65 | - | - | - | - | Romania | |
| Free market - Romania | ||||||||
| by time from disconnection to payment - Romania (Free market) |
(no.) | 4,218 | - | - | - | - | Romania | |
| < 48 h | (no.) | 2,337 | - | - | - | - | Romania | |
| 48 h - 1 week | (no.) | 373 | - | - | - | - | Romania | |
| 1 week - 1 month | (no.) | 379 | - | - | - | - | Romania | |
| 1 month - 1 year | (no.) | 645 | - | - | - | - | Romania | |
| > 1 year | (no.) | 484 | - | - | - | - | Romania | |
| by time from payment to reconnection - Romania (Free market) |
(no.) | 3,734 | - | - | - | - | Romania | |
| < 24 h | (no.) | 3,058 | - | - | - | - | Romania | |
| 24 h - 1 week | (no.) | 636 | - | - | - | - | Romania | |
| > 1 week | (no.) | 40 | - | - | - | - | Romania |
| GRI/ EUSS KPI |
UM | December 2020 December 2019 December 2018 | 2020-2019 | % | Scope | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Regulated market - Iberia | ||||||||
| by time from disconnection to payment - Iberia (Regulated market) |
(no.) | 10,411 | - | - | - | - | Iberia | |
| < 48 h | (no.) | 8,231 | - | - | - | - | Iberia | |
| 48 h - 1 week | (no.) | 1,294 | - | - | - | - | Iberia | |
| 1 week - 1 month | (no.) | 814 | - | - | - | - | Iberia | |
| 1 month - 1 year | (no.) | 72 | - | - | - | - | Iberia | |
| > 1 year | (no.) | - | - | - | - | - | Iberia | |
| by time from payment to reconnection - Iberia (Regulated market) |
(no.) | 10,811 | - | - | - | - | Iberia | |
| < 24 h | (no.) | 10,304 | - | - | - | - | Iberia | |
| 24 h - 1 week | (no.) | 307 | - | - | - | - | Iberia | |
| > 1 week | (no.) | 200 | - | - | - | - | Iberia | |
| Free market - Iberia | ||||||||
| by time from disconnection to payment - Iberia (Free market) |
(no.) | 12,536 | - | - | - | - | Iberia | |
| < 48 h | (no.) | 10,290 | - | - | - | - | Iberia | |
| 48 h - 1 week | (no.) | 1,443 | - | - | - | - | Iberia | |
| 1 week - 1 month | (no.) | 731 | - | - | - | - | Iberia | |
| 1 month - 1 year | (no.) | 72 | - | - | - | - | Iberia | |
| > 1 year | (no.) | - | - | - | - | - | Iberia | |
| by time from payment to reconnection - Iberia (Free market) |
(no.) | 12,345 | - | - | - | - | Iberia | |
| < 24 h | (no.) | 12,000 | - | - | - | - | Iberia | |
| 24 h - 1 week | (no.) | 318 | - | - | - | - | Iberia | |
| > 1 week | (no.) | 27 | - | - | - | - | Iberia | |
| by time from disconnection to payment - Iberia (Gas market) |
(no.) | 1,348 | - | - | - | - | Iberia | |
| < 48 h | (no.) | 762 | - | - | - | - | Iberia | |
| 48 h - 1 week | (no.) | 267 | - | - | - | - | Iberia | |
| 1 week - 1 month | (no.) | 192 | - | - | - | - | Iberia | |
| 1 month - 1 year | (no.) | 127 | - | - | - | - | Iberia | |
| > 1 year | (no.) | - | - | - | - | - | Iberia | |
| by time from payment to reconnection | ||||||||
| - Iberia (Gas market) | (no.) | 1,273 | - | - | - | - | Iberia | |
| < 24 h | (no.) | 236 | - | - | - | - | Iberia | |
| 24 h - 1 week | (no.) | 767 | - | - | - | - | Iberia | |
| > 1 week | (no.) | 270 | - | - | - | - | Iberia | |
| Regulated market - Latin America | ||||||||
| by time from disconnection to payment - Latin America (Regulated market) |
(no.) | 716,328 | - | - | - | - Latin America | ||
| < 48 h | (no.) | 332,424 | - | - | - | - Latin America | ||
| 48 h - 1 week | (no.) | 80,888 | - | - | - | - Latin America | ||
| 1 week - 1 month | (no.) | 118,244 | - | - | - | - Latin America | ||
| 1 month - 1 year | (no.) | 184,769 | - | - | - | - Latin America | ||
| > 1 year | (no.) | 3 | - | - | - | - Latin America | ||
| by time from payment to reconnection - Latin America (Regulated market) |
(no.) | 811,756 | - | - | - | - Latin America | ||
| < 24 h | (no.) | 788,338 | - | - | - | - Latin America | ||
| 24 h - 1 week | (no.) | 19,607 | - | - | - | - Latin America | ||
| > 1 week | (no.) | 3,811 | - | - | - | - Latin America | ||

| EUSS KPI | UM | December 2020 December 2019 December 2018 | 2020-2019 | % | Scope | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Free market - Latin America | ||||||||
| by time from disconnection to payment - Latin America (Free market) (no.) |
8 | - | - | - | - Latin America | |||
| < 48 h | (no.) | 7 | - | - | - | - Latin America | ||
| 48 h - 1 week | (no.) | 1 | - | - | - | - Latin America | ||
| 1 week - 1 month | (no.) | - | - | - | - | - Latin America | ||
| 1 month - 1 year | (no.) | - | - | - | - | - Latin America | ||
| > 1 year | (no.) | - | - | - | - | - Latin America | ||
| by time from payment to reconnection | ||||||||
| - Latin America (Free market) | (no.) | 7 | - | - | - | - Latin America | ||
| < 24 h | (no.) | 4 | - | - | - | - Latin America | ||
| 24 h - 1 week | (no.) | 2 | - | - | - | - Latin America | ||
| > 1 week | (no.) | 1 | - | - | - | - Latin America | ||
| Disputes with customers | ||||||||
| Total proceedings | (no.) | 112,938 | 121,175 | 101,057 | -8,237 | -6.8 | Enel | |
| (%) | 62.7 | 77.9 | 66.5 | -15 | - | Enel |
(1) The 2019 figures include a more specific determination thereof.
(2) The park efficiency was calculated assuming the operation of the plants at load level, where there is maximum efficiency for those plants; for these, the load curve is available. This assumption has not been applied to the heat component since it is already high efficiency; the availability was calculated by reducing the causes of internal unavailability.
(3) Some 2019 figures have been updated.
(4) The value is calculated on a 1-100 scale-basis.
(5) In 2020, the value calculation has changed: from a 100 point scale to a 10 point scale.
(6) Iberia includes the mass market public segment and large companies in the calculation of customer satisfaction.
| GRI/ EUSS KPI |
UM | December 2020 December 2019 December 2018 | 2020-2019 | % | Scope | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SIZE AND COMPOSITION OF WORKFORCE |
||||||||
| Size of workforce | ||||||||
| 102-7 Total workforce | (no.) | 66,717 | 68,253 | 69,272 | -1,536 | -2.3 | Enel | |
| Average workforce | (no.) | 67,078 | 68,303 | 66,696 | -1,225 | -1.8 | Enel | |
| Change to size (1) | ||||||||
| 401-1 New recruits | (no.) | 3,131 | 3,726 | 3,414 | -595 -16.0 | Enel | ||
| Changes in scope | (no.) | -971 | 75 | 7,704 | -1,046 | - | Enel | |
| Terminations | (no.) | 3,696 | 4,820 | 4,746 | -1,124 -23.3 | Enel | ||
| Balance | (no.) | -1,536 | -1,019 | 6,372 | -517 | 50.7 | Enel | |
| 102-8 | Workforce by geographic area and gender |
|||||||
| Italy ( ²) |
(no.) | 29,800 | 29,767 | 30,311 | 33 | 0.1 | Italy | |
| - of whom men | (no.) | 23,971 | 24,059 | 24,562 | -88 | -0.4 | Italy | |
| - of whom women | (no.) | 5,829 | 5,708 | 5,749 | 121 | 2.1 | Italy | |
| Iberia (3) | (no.) | 9,781 | 10,123 | 9,947 | -342 | -3.4 | Iberia | |
| - of whom men | (no.) | 7,381 | 7,704 | 7,626 | -323 | -4.2 | Iberia | |
| - of whom women | (no.) | 2,400 | 2,419 | 2,321 | -19 | -0.8 | Iberia | |
| Europe (4) | (no.) | 4,966 | 5,907 | 5,683 | -941 -15.9 | Europe | ||
| - of whom men | (no.) | 3,473 | 4,233 | 4,092 | -760 -18.0 | Europe | ||
| - of whom women | (no.) | 1,493 | 1,674 | 1,591 | -181 -10.8 | Europe | ||
| North America (5) | (no.) | 1,639 | 1,639 | 2,007 | - | - North America | ||
| - of whom men | (no.) | 1,179 | 1,210 | 1,454 | -31 | -2.6 North America | ||
| - of whom women | (no.) | 460 | 429 | 553 | 31 | 7.2 North America | ||
| Latin America | (no.) | 19,838 | 20,240 | 21,083 | -402 | -2.0 Latin America | ||
| - of whom men | (no.) | 15,852 | 16,322 | 17,085 | -470 | -2.9 Latin America | ||
| - of whom women | (no.) | 3,986 | 3,918 | 3,998 | 68 | 1.7 Latin America | ||
| Africa, Asia and Oceania (6) | (no.) | 693 | 577 | 241 | 116 | 20.1 | Africa, Asia and Oceania |
|
| - of whom men | (no.) | 490 | 405 | 153 | 85 | 21.0 | Africa, Asia and Oceania |
|
| - of whom women | (no.) | 203 | 172 | 88 | 31 | 18.0 | Africa, Asia and Oceania |
|
| Total workforce | (no.) | 66,717 | 68,253 | 69,272 | -1,536 | -2.3 | Enel | |
| - of whom men | (no.) | 52,346 | 53,933 | 54,972 | -1,587 | -2.9 | Enel | |
| - of whom women | (no.) | 14,371 | 14,320 | 14,300 | 51 | 0.4 | Enel | |
| Incidence of managers by geographical area |
||||||||
| Italy ( ²) |
(no.) | 29,800 | 29,767 | 30,311 | 33 | 0.1 | Italy | |
| (%) | 44.7 | 43.6 | 43.8 | 1.1 | - | Italy | ||

| GRI/ EUSS KPI |
UM | December 2020 December 2019 December 2018 | 2020-2019 | % | Scope | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (%) of total number of managers of the Group |
(%) | 58.3 | 58.0 | 57.0 | 0.3 | - | Italy | |
| (%) of total number of no-managers of the Group |
(%) | 44.4 | 43.3 | 43.5 | 1.1 | - | Italy | |
| Iberia (3) | (no.) | 9,781 | 10,123 | 9,947 | -342 | -3.4 | Iberia | |
| (%) | 14.7 | 14.8 | 14.4 | -0.2 | - | Iberia | ||
| (%) of total number of managers of the Group |
(%) | 21.3 | 21.6 | 22.5 | -0.4 | - | Iberia | |
| (%) of total number of no-managers of the Group |
(%) | 14.5 | 11.1 | 10.8 | 3.4 | - | Iberia | |
| Romania | (no.) | 3,248 | 3,246 | 3,047 | 2 | 0.1 | Romania | |
| (%) | 4.9 | 4.8 | 4.4 | 0.1 | - | Romania | ||
| (%) of total number of managers of the Group |
(%) | 1.4 | 1.4 | 1.4 | - | - | Romania | |
| (%) of total number of no-managers of the Group |
(%) | 4.9 | 4.8 | 4.5 | 0.1 | - | Romania | |
| Russia | (no.) | 1,472 | 2,447 | 2,528 | -975 -39.8 | Russia | ||
| (%) | 2.2 | 3.7 | 3.8 | -1.5 | - | Russia | ||
| (%) of total number of managers of the Group |
(%) | 1.6 | 1.7 | 1.6 | -0.1 | - | Russia | |
| (%) of total number of no-managers of the Group |
(%) | 2.2 | 3.6 | 3.7 | -1.4 | - | Russia | |
| Brazil | (no.) | 10,040 | 10,544 | 11,267 | -504 | -4.8 | Brazil | |
| (%) | 15.0 | 15.8 | 16.9 | -0.8 | - | Brazil | ||
| (%) of total number of managers of the Group |
(%) | 4.2 | 4.2 | 4.0 | 0.0 | - | Brazil | |
| (%) of total number of no-managers of the Group |
(%) | 15.3 | 15.7 | 16.5 | -0.4 | - | Brazil | |
| Argentina | (no.) | 4,048 | 4,082 | 4,349 | -34 | -0.8 | Argentina | |
| (%) | 6.1 | 6.1 | 6.5 | -0.1 | - | Argentina | ||
| (%) of total number of managers of the Group |
(%) | 1.7 | 1.5 | 1.4 | 0.3 | - | Argentina | |
| (%) of total number of no-managers of the Group |
(%) | 6.2 | 6.1 | 6.4 | 0.1 | - | Argentina | |
| Chile | (no.) | 2,281 | 2,217 | 2,137 | 64 | 2.9 | Chile | |
| (%) | 3.4 | 3.3 | 3.2 | 0.1 | - | Chile | ||
| (%) of total number of managers of the Group |
(%) | 4.4 | 4.2 | 4.3 | 0.2 | - | Chile | |
| (%) of total number of no-managers of the Group |
(%) | 3.4 | 3.2 | 3.1 | 0.2 | - | Chile | |
| Peru | (no.) | 954 | 935 | 932 | 19 | 2.0 | Peru | |
| (%) | 1.4 | 1.4 | 1.4 | - | - | Peru | ||
| (%) of total number of managers of the Group |
(%) | 1.9 | 2.1 | 2.5 | -0.2 | - | Peru | |
| (%) of total number of no-managers of the Group |
(%) | 1.4 | 1.4 | 1.3 | - | - | Peru | |
| Colombia | (no.) | 2,191 | 2,136 | 2,168 | 55 | 2.6 | Colombia | |
| (%) | 3.3 | 3.2 | 3.2 | 0.1 | - | Colombia | ||
| (%) of total number of managers of the Group |
(%) | 2.6 | 2.7 | 2.5 | -0.1 | - | Colombia | |
| (%) of total number of no-managers of the Group |
(%) | 3.3 | 3.1 | 3.1 | 0.2 | - | Colombia | |
| United States | (no.) | 1,287 | 1,289 | 1,719 | -2 | -0.2 United States | ||
| (%) | 1.9 | 1.9 | 2.6 | - | - United States | |||
| (%) of total number of managers of the Group |
(%) | 1.2 | 0.9 | 1.7 | 0.3 | - United States |
| GRI/ EUSS KPI |
UM | December 2020 December 2019 December 2018 | 2020-2019 | % | Scope | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (%) of total number of no-managers of the Group |
(%) | 1.9 | 1.9 | 2.5 | - | - United States | ||
| 405-1 Workforce by level and gender | ||||||||
| Managers | (no.) | 1,397 | 1,363 | 1,346 | 34 | 2.5 | Enel | |
| - of whom men | (no.) | 1,095 | 1,078 | 1,081 | 17 | 1.5 | Enel | |
| (%) | 78.4 | 79.1 | 80.3 | -0.7 | - | Enel | ||
| - of whom women | (no.) | 302 | 285 | 265 | 17 | 6.1 | Enel | |
| (%) | 21.6 | 20.9 | 19.7 | 0.7 | - | Enel | ||
| Middle Managers | (no.) | 11,592 | 11,329 | 10,985 | 263 | 2.3 | Enel | |
| - of whom men | (no.) | 8,069 | 8,012 | 7,856 | 57 | 0.7 | Enel | |
| (%) | 69.6 | 70.7 | 71.5 | -1.1 | - | Enel | ||
| - of whom women | (no.) | 3,523 | 3,317 | 3,129 | 206 | 6.2 | Enel | |
| (%) | 30.4 | 29.3 | 28.5 | 1.1 | - | Enel | ||
| White-collar workers | (no.) | 35,883 | 36,274 | 34,710 | -391 | -1.1 | Enel | |
| - of whom men | (no.) | 25,706 | 26,025 | 24,404 | -319 | -1.2 | Enel | |
| (%) | 71.6 | 71.7 | 70.3 | -0.1 | - | Enel | ||
| - of whom women | (no.) | 10,177 | 10,249 | 10,306 | -72 | -0.7 | Enel | |
| (%) | 28.4 | 28.3 | 29.7 | 0.1 | - | Enel | ||
| Blue-collar workers | (no.) | 17,845 | 19,287 | 22,231 | -1,442 | -7.5 | Enel | |
| - of whom men | (no.) | 17,476 | 18,818 | 21,631 | -1,342 | -7.1 | Enel | |
| (%) | 97.9 | 97.6 | 97.3 | 0.4 | - | Enel | ||
| - of whom women | (no.) | 369 | 469 | 600 | -100 -21.3 | Enel | ||
| (%) | 2.1 | 2.4 | 2.7 | -0.4 | - | Enel | ||
| Total | (no.) | 66,717 | 68,253 | 69,272 | -1,536 | -2.3 | Enel | |
| Index of professional qualification | ||||||||
| Managers | (%) | 2.1 | 2.0 | 1.9 | 0.1 | - | Enel | |
| Middle Managers | (%) | 17.4 | 16.6 | 15.9 | 0.8 | - | Enel | |
| White-collar workers | (%) | 53.8 | 53.1 | 50.1 | 0.6 | - | Enel | |
| Blue-collar workers | (%) | 26.7 | 28.3 | 32.1 | -1.5 | - | Enel | |
| 405-1 Workforce by age range and level | ||||||||
| < 30 | (%) | 10.9 | 11.6 | 11.8 | -0.6 | - | Enel | |
| - of whom Managers | (%) | - | - | - | - | - | Enel | |
| - of whom Middle Managers | (%) | 0.4 | 0.3 | 0.3 | 0.1 | - | Enel | |
| - of whom White-collar workers | (%) | 5.2 | 5.3 | 4.9 | -0.1 | - | Enel | |
| - of whom Blue-collar workers | (%) | 5.3 | 5.9 | 6.6 | -0.6 | - | Enel | |
| 30 - 50 | (%) | 54.5 | 54.7 | 57.0 | -0.2 | - | Enel | |
| - of whom Managers | (%) | 1.0 | 0.9 | 1.1 | 0.1 | - | Enel | |
| - of whom Middle Managers | (%) | 10.7 | 10.4 | 10.4 | 0.3 | - | Enel | |
| - of whom White-collar workers | (%) | 27.7 | 27.4 | 27.1 | 0.3 | - | Enel | |
| - of whom Blue-collar workers | (%) | 15.1 | 15.9 | 18.4 | -0.8 | - | Enel | |
| > 50 | (%) | 34.6 | 33.8 | 31.2 | 0.8 | - | Enel | |
| - of whom Managers | (%) | 1.1 | 1.0 | 0.9 | 0.1 | - | Enel | |
| - of whom Middle Managers | (%) | 6.3 | 5.9 | 5.1 | 0.3 | - | Enel | |
| - of whom White-collar workers | (%) | 20.9 | 20.4 | 18.1 | 0.5 | - | Enel | |
| - of whom Blue-collar workers | (%) | 6.3 | 6.4 | 7.1 | -0.1 | - | Enel | |
| Average age | (years) | 44.1 | 43.8 | 43.3 | - | - | Enel | |

| GRI/ EUSS KPI |
UM | December 2020 December 2019 December 2018 | 2020-2019 | % | Scope | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Workforce by type of contract and | ||||||||
| 102-8 | gender | |||||||
| Permanent contract | (no.) | 65,822 | 64,976 | 68,137 | 846 | 1.3 | Enel | |
| - of whom men | (no.) | 51,783 | 51,482 | 54,112 | 301 | 0.6 | Enel | |
| - of whom women | (no.) | 14,039 | 13,494 | 14,025 | 545 | 4.0 | Enel | |
| Fixed-term contracts (7) | (no.) | 895 | 3,277 | 1,135 | -2,382 -72.7 | Enel | ||
| - of whom men | (no.) | 563 | 2,451 | 860 | -1,888 -77.0 | Enel | ||
| - of whom women | (no.) | 332 | 826 | 275 | -494 -59.8 | Enel | ||
| Total contracts | (no.) | 66,717 | 68,253 | 69,272 | -1,536 | -2.3 | Enel | |
| - of whom men | (no.) | 52,346 | 53,933 | 54,972 | -1,587 | -2.9 | Enel | |
| - of whom women | (no.) | 14,371 | 14,320 | 12,930 | 51 | - | Enel | |
| Fixed-term and insertion/work contracts as percentage of total |
(%) | 1.3 | 4.8 | 1.6 | -3.5 | - | Enel | |
| Internship and traineeships | (no.) | 358 | 882 | 1,136 | -524 -59.4 | Enel | ||
| 102-8 | Workforce by type of contract and geographic area |
|||||||
| Italy (2) | (no.) | 29,800 | 29,767 | 30,311 | 33 | 0.1 | Italy | |
| Permanent contract | (no.) | 29,783 | 29,743 | 30,271 | 40 | 0.1 | Italy | |
| Fixed-term contracts | (no.) | 17 | 24 | 40 | -7 -29.2 | Italy | ||
| Iberia | (no.) | 9,781 | 10,123 | 9,947 | -342 | -3.4 | Iberia | |
| Permanent contract | (no.) | 9,531 | 9,733 | 9,610 | -202 | -2.1 | Iberia | |
| Fixed-term contracts | (no.) | 250 | 390 | 337 | -140 -35.9 | Iberia | ||
| Latin America | (no.) | 19,838 | 20,240 | 21,083 | -402 | -2.0 Latin America | ||
| Permanent contract | (no.) | 19,374 | 17,544 | 20,437 | 1,830 | 10.4 Latin America | ||
| Fixed-term contracts (7) | (no.) | 464 | 2,696 | 646 | -2,232 -82.8 Latin America | |||
| Europe | (no.) | 4,966 | 5,907 | 5,683 | -941 -15.9 | Europe | ||
| Permanent contract | (no.) | 4,817 | 5,750 | 5,648 | -933 -16.2 | Europe | ||
| Fixed-term contracts | (no.) | 149 | 157 | 35 | -8 | -5.1 | Europe | |
| North America | (no.) | 1,639 | 1,639 | 2,007 | - | - North America | ||
| Permanent contract | (no.) | 1,627 | 1,639 | 1,932 | -12 | -0.7 North America | ||
| Fixed-term contracts | (no.) | 12 | - | 75 | 12 | - North America | ||
| Africa, Asia and Oceania | (no.) | 693 | 577 | 241 | 116 | 20.1 | Africa, Asia and Oceania |
|
| Permanent contract | (no.) | 690 | 569 | 239 | 121 | 21.3 | Africa, Asia and Oceania |
|
| Fixed-term contracts | (no.) | 3 | 8 | 2 | -5 -62.5 | Africa, Asia and Oceania |
||
| 102-8 | Workforce by type of contract and gender |
|||||||
| Full-time contracts | (no.) | 66,074 | 67,514 | 68,390 | -1,440 | -2.1 | Enel | |
| - of whom men | (no.) | 52,208 | 53,770 | 54,748 | -1,562 | -2.9 | Enel | |
| - of whom women | (no.) | 13,866 | 13,744 | 13,642 | 122 | 0.9 | Enel | |
| Part-time contracts | (no.) | 643 | 739 | 882 | -96 -13.0 | Enel | ||
| - of whom men | (no.) | 138 | 164 | 224 | -26 -15.9 | Enel | ||
| - of whom women | (no.) | 505 | 575 | 658 | -70 -12.2 | Enel | ||
| Part Time + Full Time | (no.) | 66,717 | 68,253 | 69,272 | -1,536 | -2.3 | Enel | |
| Percentage of part-time | (%) | 1.0 | 1.2 | 1.3 | -0.2 | - | Enel |
| GRI/ EUSS KPI |
UM | December 2020 December 2019 December 2018 | 2020-2019 | % | Scope | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 401-1 CHANGES TO SIZE | ||||||||
| New hires | ||||||||
| New hires by gender | (no.) | 3,131 | 3,726 | 3,414 | -595 -16.0 | Enel | ||
| Hiring rate (8) | (%) | 4.7 | 5.5 | 4.9 | -0.8 | - | Enel | |
| -men | (no.) | 2,203 | 2,702 | 2,410 | -499 -18.5 | Enel | ||
| (%) | 70.4 | 72.5 | 70.6 | -2.2 | - | Enel | ||
| -women | (no.) | 928 | 1,024 | 1,004 | -96 | -9.4 | Enel | |
| (%) | 29.6 | 27.4 | 29.4 | 2.2 | - | Enel | ||
| New hires by age range | (no.) | 3,131 | 3,726 | 3,414 | -595 -16.0 | Enel | ||
| up to 30 | (no.) | 1,363 | 1,865 | 1,622 | -502 -26.9 | Enel | ||
| (%) | 43.5 | 50.1 | 47.5 | -6.5 | - | Enel | ||
| from 30 to 50 | (no.) | 1,700 | 1,698 | 1,628 | 2 | 0.1 | Enel | |
| (%) | 54.3 | 45.6 | 47.7 | 8.7 | - | Enel | ||
| over 50 | (no.) | 68 | 163 | 164 | -95 -58.3 | Enel | ||
| (%) | 2.2 | 4.4 | 4.8 | -2.2 | - | Enel | ||
| New hires by geographic area | ||||||||
| Italy (2) | (no.) | 1,044 | 1,058 | 796 | -14 | -1.3 | Italy | |
| (%) | 33.3 | 28.4 | 23.3 | 4.9 | - | Italy | ||
| Iberia | (no.) | 257 | 430 | 425 | -173 -40.2 | Iberia | ||
| (%) | 8.2 | 11.5 | 12.4 | -3.3 | - | Iberia | ||
| Europe (4) | (no.) | 280 | 512 | 345 | -232 -45.3 | Europe | ||
| (%) | 8.9 | 13.7 | 10.1 | -4.8 | - | Europe | ||
| North America | (no.) | 362 | 435 | 594 | -73 -16.8 North America | |||
| (%) | 11.6 | 11.7 | 17.4 | -0.1 | - North America | |||
| Latin America | (no.) | 991 | 1,098 | 1,182 | -107 | -9.7 Latin America | ||
| (%) | 31.7 | 29.5 | 34.6 | 2.2 | 7.4 Latin America | |||
| Africa, Asia and Oceania | (no.) | 197 | 193 | 72 | 4 | 2.1 | Africa, Asia and Oceania |
|
| (%) | 6.3 | 5.2 | 2.1 | 1.1 | - | Africa, Asia and Oceania |
||
| Effect of the changes in scope | (no.) | -971 | 75 | 7,704 | -1,046 | - | Enel | |
| Terminations | ||||||||
| Causes | ||||||||
| Voluntary terminations | (no.) | 717 | 1,095 | 1,451 | -378 -34.5 | Enel | ||
| Incentive based terminations | (no.) | 817 | 2,304 | 2,543 | -1,487 -64.5 | Enel | ||
| Retirements and other | (no.) | 2,162 | 1,421 | 752 | 741 | 52.1 | Enel | |
| Total terminations | (no.) | 3,696 | 4,820 | 4,746 | -1,124 -23.3 | Enel | ||
| Terminations by gender | ||||||||
| -men | (no.) | 3,002 | 3,766 | 3,845 | -764 -20.3 | Enel | ||
| (%) | 81.2 | 78.1 | 81.0 | 3.1 | - | Enel | ||
| -women | (no.) | 694 | 1,054 | 900 | -360 -34.2 | Enel | ||
| (%) | 18.8 | 21.9 | 19.0 | -3.1 | - | Enel | ||
| Terminations by age range | (no.) | 3,696 | 4,820 | 4,746 | -1,124 -23.3 | Enel | ||
| up to 30 | (no.) | 547 | 626 | 499 | -79 -12.6 | Enel | ||
| (%) | 14.8 | 13.0 | 10.5 | 1.8 | - | Enel | ||
| from 30 to 50 | (no.) | 1,273 | 1,867 | 1,532 | -594 -31.8 | Enel | ||
| (%) | 34.4 | 38.7 | 32.3 | -4.3 | - | Enel | ||
| over 50 | (no.) | 1,876 | 2,327 | 2,715 | -451 -19.4 | Enel |

| GRI/ EUSS KPI |
UM | December 2020 December 2019 December 2018 | 2020-2019 | % | Scope | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (%) | 50.8 | 48.3 | 57.2 | 2.5 | - | Enel | ||
| Terminations by nationality | ||||||||
| Italy (2) | (no.) | 1,011 | 1,622 | 1,668 | -611 -37.7 | Italy | ||
| (%) | 27.4 | 33.3 | 35.1 | -6.0 | - | Italy | ||
| Iberia | (no.) | 599 | 254 | 425 | 345 | - | Iberia | |
| (%) | 16.2 | 5.3 | 9.0 | 10.9 | - | Iberia | ||
| Europe (3) | (no.) | 299 | 354 | 384 | -55 -15.5 | Europe | ||
| (%) | 8.1 | 7.7 | 8.1 | 0.4 | - | Europe | ||
| North America | (no.) | 313 | 392 | 374 | -79 -20.2 North America | |||
| North and | ||||||||
| (%) | 8.5 | 8.1 | 7.9 | 0.3 | - | Central America | ||
| Latin America | (no.) | 1,393 | 2,103 | 1,862 | -710 -33.8 Latin America | |||
| (%) | 37.7 | 43.6 | 39.2 | -5.9 | - Latin America | |||
| Africa, Asia and Oceania | (no.) | 81 | 95 | 33 | -14 -14.7 | Africa, Asia and Oceania |
||
| Africa, Asia and | ||||||||
| (no.) | 2.2 | 2.0 | 0.7 | 0.2 | - | Oceania | ||
| Turnover rate (9) | (%) | 5.6 | 7.1 | 6.9 | -1.5 | - | Enel | |
| Turnover rate by gender | ||||||||
| - men | (%) | 5.7 | - | - | 5.7 | - | Enel | |
| - women | (%) | 4.8 | - | - | 4.8 | - | Enel | |
| Turnover rate by age range | ||||||||
| up to 30 | (%) | 7.5 | - | - | 7.5 | - | Enel | |
| from 30 to 50 | (%) | 3.5 | - | - | 3.5 | - | Enel | |
| over 50 | (%) | 8.1 | - | - | 8.1 | - | Enel | |
| VALORIZATION | ||||||||
| 404-3 Assessment (10) | ||||||||
| Dissemination of assessment | (%) | 93.8 | 93.3 | 94.8 | 0.5 | - | Enel | |
| -men | (%) | 94.0 | 93.5 | 95.5 | 0.5 | - | Enel | |
| -women | (%) | 93.0 | 92.7 | 92.2 | 0.3 | - | Enel | |
| People assessed by level | ||||||||
| Managers | (%) | 97.8 | 96.7 | 95.9 | 1.1 | - | Enel | |
| Middle Managers | (%) | 93.7 | 92.5 | 91.2 | 1.2 | - | Enel | |
| White collar | (%) | 93.4 | 94.7 | 94.3 | -1.3 | - | Enel | |
| Blue collar | (%) | 94.4 | 90.9 | 94.8 | 3.5 | - | Enel | |
| Rewarding | ||||||||
| Dissemination of incentives | (%) | 43.6 | 41.6 | 36.1 | 2.0 | - | Enel | |
| Employees with individual incentives | (no.) | 47,644 | 28,367 | 24,976 | 19,277 68.0 | Enel | ||
| - of whom Managers | (no.) | 2,350 | 1,312 | 1,336 | 1,038 | 79.1 | Enel | |
| - of whom Middle Managers | (no.) | 10,911 | 7,183 | 6,608 | 3,728 | 51.9 | Enel | |
| - of whom White collar workers and Blue collar workers |
(no.) | 34,383 | 19,872 | 17,032 | 14,511 | 73.0 | Enel | |
| 404-1 Training | ||||||||
| Training hours by employees | (h/per cap) |
40.9 | 38.8 | 40.2 | 2.1 | 5.5 | Enel | |
| by gender | ||||||||
| (h/per | ||||||||
| -men | cap) | 40.4 | 39.7 | 41.2 | 0.7 | 1.6 | Enel | |
| -women | (h/per cap) |
42.7 | 35.0 | 36.2 | 7.7 | 22.0 | Enel |
| GRI/ EUSS KPI |
UM | December 2020 December 2019 December 2018 | 2020-2019 | % | Scope | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| by level | ||||||||
| Managers | (h/per cap) |
31.9 | 58.4 | 40.3 | -26.5 -45.4 | Enel | ||
| Middle Managers | (h/per cap) |
41.4 | 44.9 | 42.2 | -3.5 | -7.9 | Enel | |
| White collar | (h/per cap) |
35.7 | 29.6 | 33.5 | 6.1 | 20.7 | Enel | |
| Blue collar | (h/per cap) |
51.4 | 49.6 | 50.1 | 1.8 | 3.5 | Enel | |
| Total training hours (distance learning + classroom) |
(,000 h) | 2,744 | 2,648 | 2,684 | 96 | 3.6 | Enel | |
| Training hours distance learning | (,000 h) | 448 | 248 | 212 | 200 80.4 | Enel | ||
| - for managerial training | (,000 h) | 94 | 122 | 105 | -28 -22.8 | Enel | ||
| - for specialist training | (,000 h) | 354 | 127 | 107 | 227 | - | Enel | |
| Training hours in the classroom | (,000 h) | 2,296 | 2,370 | 2,472 | -74 | -3.1 | Enel | |
| - for managerial training | (,000 h) | 170 | 719 | 636 | -549 -76.3 | Enel | ||
| - for specialist training | (,000 h) | 2,126 | 1,651 | 1,836 | 475 | 28.8 | Enel | |
| Training hours job shadowing (on site coaching) |
(,000 h) | 6,680 | 20,992 | 0.8 | -14,312 | - | Enel | |
| Incidence of distance learning training | (%) | 16.3 | 9.4 | 7.9 | 6.9 | - | Enel | |
| Total training hours by level | (,000 h) | 2,744 | 2,648 | 2,684 | 96 | 3.6 | Enel | |
| Managers | (,000 h) | 45 | 81 | 54 | -36 -44.3 | Enel | ||
| Middle Managers | (,000 h) | 466 | 495 | 448 | -29 | -5.9 | Enel | |
| White collar | (,000 h) | 1,287 | 1,037 | 1,137 | 250 | 24.1 | Enel | |
| Blue collar | (,000 h) | 946 | 1,035 | 1,045 | -89 | -8.6 | Enel | |
| Dissemination of sustainability | ||||||||
| (h/per | ||||||||
| Training per capita on sustainability | cap) | 21.7 | 16.5 | 15.5 | 5.2 | 31.6 | Enel | |
| Total training hours on sustainability | (,000 h) | 1,457 | 1,126 | 1,010 | 331 | 29.4 | Enel | |
| Digitalization | (,000 h) | 342 | 305 | 213 | 37 | 12.0 | Enel | |
| Environment | (,000 h) | 48 | 33 | 32 | 15 46.5 | Enel | ||
| Safety | (,000 h) | 979 | 683 | 726 | 296 43.3 | Enel | ||
| Human rights | (,000 h) | 5 | 13 | 4 | -8 -61.2 | Enel | ||
| Other (11) | (,000 h) | 61 | 73 | 16 | -12 -16.8 | Enel | ||
| Code of Ethics | (,000 h) | 22 | 19 | 19 | 3 15.0 | Enel | ||
| 205-2 | Training on anti-corruption policies and procedures communication |
(no.) | 26,660 | 19,798 | n.a. | 6,862.0 34.7 | Enel | |
| (%) | 40.0 | 29.0 | n.a. | 11.0 | - | Enel | ||
| Training on anti-corruption policies and procedures communication by geographic area |
||||||||
| Italy | (no.) | 14,224 | 10,519 | n.a. | 3,705 35.2 | Italy | ||
| (%) | 47.7 | 35.3 | n.a. | 12.4 | - | Italy | ||
| Iberia | (no.) | 1,977 | 3,428 | n.a. | -1,451 -42.3 | Iberia | ||
| (%) | 20.2 | 33.9 | n.a. | -13.6 | - | Iberia | ||
| Latin America | (no.) | 5,326 | 3,655 | n.a. | 1,671 | 45.7 Latin America | ||
| (%) | 26.8 | 18.1 | n.a. | 8.8 | - Latin America | |||
| Europe | (no.) | 4,006 | 1,444 | n.a. | 2,562 | - | Europe | |
| (%) | 80.7 | 24.4 | n.a. | 56.2 | - | Europe | ||
| Asia and Oceania | (no.) | 197 | 39 | n.a. | 158 | - | Asia and Oceania |
|
| (%) | 28.4 | 6.8 | n.a. | 21.7 | - | Asia and Oceania |

| GRI/ EUSS KPI |
UM | December 2020 December 2019 December 2018 | 2020-2019 | % | Scope | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| North and Central America | (no.) | 930 | 713 | n.a. | 217 30.4 | North and Central America |
||
| (%) | 56.7 | 43.5 | n.a. | 13.2 | - | North and Central America |
||
| Training on anti-corruption policies and procedures communication by level |
||||||||
| Manager | (no.) | 407 | 393 | n.a. | 14.0 | 3.6 | Enel | |
| (%) | 29.1 | 28.8 | n.a. | 0.3 | - | Enel | ||
| Middle Manager | (no.) | 3,967 | 3,560 | n.a. | 407.0 | 11.4 | Enel | |
| (%) | 34.2 | 31.4 | n.a. | 2.8 | - | Enel | ||
| White collar | (no.) | 14,856 | 10,409 | n.a. | 4447.0 | 42.7 | Enel | |
| (%) | 41.4 | 28.7 | n.a. | 12.7 | - | Enel | ||
| Blue collar | (no.) | 7,430 | 5,436 | n.a. | 1,994 36.7 | Enel | ||
| (%) | 41.6 | 28.2 | n.a. | 13.5 | - | Enel | ||
| 201-3 CORPORATE WELFARE | ||||||||
| Employees covered by pension plan (benefit plan) |
(no.) | 53,715 | 47,688 | 47,100 | 6,027 | 12.6 | Enel | |
| Employees covered by pension plan (benefit plan) |
(%) | 80.5 | 69.9 | 68.0 | 10.6 | - | Enel | |
| EU15 | Employees entitled to retire in next 5 to 10 years |
|||||||
| Pension within 5 years - Enel | ||||||||
| Managers | (%) | 3.6 | 6.5 | 4.6 | -2.9 | - | Enel | |
| Middle Managers | (%) | 4.9 | 6.4 | 4.3 | -1.5 | - | Enel | |
| White collar | (%) | 6.6 | 9.1 | 6.3 | -2.5 | - | Enel | |
| Blue collar | (%) | 4.4 | 6.0 | 4.8 | -1.6 | - | Enel | |
| Average | (%) | 5.6 | 7.7 | 5.4 | -2.1 | - | Enel | |
| Pension within 10 years - Enel | ||||||||
| Managers | (%) | 17.7 | 19.4 | 14.4 | -1.7 | - | Enel | |
| Middle Managers | (%) | 17.0 | 18.7 | 14.0 | -1.7 | - | Enel | |
| White collar | (%) | 21.7 | 23.6 | 18.8 | -1.9 | - | Enel | |
| Blue collar | (%) | 11.0 | 15.5 | 14.8 | -4.5 | - | Enel | |
| Average | (%) | 17.9 | 20.4 | 15.7 | -2.5 | - | Enel | |
| 401-3 | MATERNITY/PATERNITY-PARENTAL LEAVE |
|||||||
| Employees entitled to parental leave by gender |
(no.) | 2,734 | n.a. | n.a. | - | - | Enel | |
| Men | (no.) | 1,741 | n.a. | n.a. | - | - | Enel | |
| Women | (no.) | 993 | n.a. | n.a. | - | - | Enel | |
| Parental leave by gender | (no.) | 2,734 | 2,684 | 2,486 | 50 | 1.9 | Enel | |
| Men | (no.) | 1,741 | 1,653 | 1,412 | 88 | 5.3 | Enel | |
| Women | (no.) | 993 | 1,001 | 1,074 | -8 | -0.8 | Enel | |
| Return to work rate of employees that took parental leave by gender |
(%) | 95.6 | n.a. | n.a. | - | - | Enel | |
| Men | (%) | 96.1 | n.a. | n.a. | - | - | Enel | |
| Women | (%) | 94.7 | n.a. | n.a. | - | - | Enel | |
| Ratention rate by gender (12) | (%) | 96.3 | n.a. | n.a. | - | - | Enel | |
| Men | (%) | 97.2 | n.a. | n.a. | - | - | Enel | |
| Women | (%) | 97.7 | n.a. | n.a. | - | - | Enel |
| GRI/ EUSS KPI |
UM | December 2020 December 2019 December 2018 | 2020-2019 | % | Scope | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EQUAL OPPORTUNITIES | ||||||||
| Incidence of women managers and middle managers (13) |
(%) | 29.4 | 28.4 | 27.5 | 1.1 | - | Enel | |
| 405-2 | Ratio of basic salary/remuneration Women/Men |
|||||||
| Ratio of basic salary Women/Men | (%) | 108.1 | 107.4 | 103.5 | 0.7 | - | Enel | |
| Managers | (%) | 86.7 | 86.7 | 84.6 | - | - | Enel | |
| Middle Managers | (%) | 96.50 | 96.0 | 92.8 | 0.5 | - | Enel | |
| White collar | (%) | 90.2 | 90.0 | 87.5 | 0.2 | - | Enel | |
| Blue collar | (%) | 77.0 | 68.6 | 90.0 | 8.4 | - | Enel | |
| Ratio of remuneration Women/Men | (%) | 108.3 | 107.6 | - | 0.7 | - | Enel | |
| Managers | (%) | 83.3 | 83.2 | - | 0.1 | - | Enel | |
| Middle Managers | (%) | 95.7 | 95.2 | - | 0.5 | - | Enel | |
| White collar | (%) | 90.3 | 90.0 | - | 0.3 | - | Enel | |
| Blue collar | (%) | 77.8 | 70.1 | - | 7.7 | - | Enel | |
| 405-1 Disability | ||||||||
| Disabled or belonging to protected categories by gender |
(no.) | 2,199 | 2,254 | 2,194 | -55 | -2.4 | Enel | |
| - of whom men | (no.) | 1,532 | 1,565 | 1,494 | -33 | -2.1 | Enel | |
| - of whom women | (no.) | 667 | 689 | 700 | -22 | -3.2 | Enel | |
| Incidence of disabled or belonging to protected categories by gender |
(%) | 3.3 | 3.3 | 3.2 | - | - | Enel | |
| - of whom men | (%) | 2.3 | 2.3 | 2.2 | - | - | Enel | |
| - of whom women | (%) | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | - | - | Enel | |
| Disabled or belonging to protected categories by age range |
(no.) | 2,199 | - | - | - | - | Enel | |
| up to 30 | (no.) | 49 | - | - | - | - | Enel | |
| from 30 to 50 | (no.) | 933 | - | - | - | - | Enel | |
| over 50 | (no.) | 1,217 | - | - | - | - | Enel | |
| Incidence of disabled or belonging to protected categories by age range |
(%) | 3.3 | - | - | - | - | Enel | |
| up to 30 | (%) | 0.1 | - | - | - | - | Enel | |
| from 30 to 50 | (%) | 1.4 | - | - | - | - | Enel | |
| over 50 | (no.) | 1.8 | - | - | - | - | Enel | |
| Disabled or belonging to protected categories by level |
||||||||
| Managers | (no.) | 3 | - | - | 3 | - | Enel | |
| Middle Managers | (no.) | 157 | 140 | 100 | 17 | 12.1 | Enel | |
| White collar | (no.) | 1,880 | 1,941 | 1,913 | -61 | -3.1 | Enel | |
| Blue collar | (no.) | 159 | 172 | 181 | -13 | -7.6 | Enel | |
| Incidence of disabled or belonging to protected categories by level |
||||||||
| Managers | (%) | - | - | - | - | - | Enel | |
| Middle Managers | (%) | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.1 | - | - | Enel | |
| White collar | (%) | 2.8 | 2.8 | 2.8 | - | - | Enel | |
| Blue collar | (%) | 0.2 | 0.3 | 0.3 | -0.1 | -5.4 | Enel | |
| Smartworking | ||||||||
| Actual people in smartworking | (no.) | 36,334 | - | - | - | - | Enel |

| GRI/ EUSS KPI |
UM | December 2020 December 2019 December 2018 | 2020-2019 | % | Scope | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Potential people in smartworking | (no.) | 37,305 | n.a. | n.a. | - | - | Enel | |
| Incidence of Smartworking | (%) | 97.4 | n.a. | n.a. | - | - | Enel | |
| 102-41 RELATIONS WITH UNIONS | ||||||||
| Union membership in the electricity sector (14) |
(%) | 50.7 | 52.2 | 52.6 | -1.5 | - | Enel | |
| Employees covered by collective agreements, by geographic area |
||||||||
| Total Enel | (no.) | 60,571 | 62,252 | 63,410 | -1,681 | -2.7 | Enel | |
| (%) | 90.8 | 91.1 | 91.5 | -0.3 | - | Enel | ||
| Italy | (no.) | 29,710 | 29,741 | 30,296 | -31 | -0.1 | Italy | |
| (%) | 99.7 | 99.9 | 100.0 | -0.2 | - | Italy | ||
| Iberia | (no.) | 8,685 | 9,161 | 9,036 | -476 | -5.2 | Iberia | |
| (%) | 88.8 | 90.5 | 90.8 | -1.7 | - | Iberia | ||
| Europe | (no.) | 4,380 | 5,308 | 5,237 | -298 -17.5 | Europe | ||
| (%) | 88.2 | 89.9 | 92.2 | -1.7 | - | Europe | ||
| Latin America | (no.) | 17,771 | 17,980 | 18,817 | -209 | -1.2 Latin America | ||
| (%) | 89.6 | 88.8 | 89.3 | 0.7 | - Latin America | |||
| North America | (no.) | 25 | 24 | 24 | 1 | - North America | ||
| (%) | - | 1.5 | 1.2 | -1.5 | - North America | |||
| Africa, Asia and | ||||||||
| Africa, Asia and Oceania | (no.) | - | 38 | - | -38 | - | Oceania | |
| (%) | - | 9.0 | - | -9.0 | - | Africa, Asia and Oceania |
||
| Dispute with employees | ||||||||
| Total proceedings (15) | (no.) | 9,028 | 10,566 | 13,350 | -1.538 -14.6 | Enel | ||
| Incidence of proceedings as defendant (%) | 98.9 | 86.2 | 98.7 | 12.7 | - | Enel |
(1) In 2020, there was a change in scope due to the sale of hydro plants in the United States, the sale of the Reftinskaya GRES plant in Russia and the acquisition of Viva Labs.
(2) Includes Branch Enel Produzione (Russia, Slovakia), Enelpower (Saudi Arabia), Branch Enel Trading (Algeria), Enel New Hydro and Dutch financial companies. For the 2019 data, a realignment was carried out due to a different classification between Italy and Europe.
(3) Includes International Endesa BV (IEBV).
(4) The following countries are considered within this scope: Romania, Russia, Bulgaria, Greece, Egypt, France, Germany, Turkey, Saudi Arabia, Slovakia, United Kingdom, Ireland, Norway, Poland and the Croatia Branch. For the 2019 data, a realignment was carried out due to a different classification between Italy and Europe.
(5) Of employees in North America, 1,067 EnerNOC employees were considered, 55% of whom are in North America, 45% in other countries (South America, Europe, Asia and Oceania), and 90 at eMotorWerks, of whom 83% are located in North America and 17% in other European countries.
(6) The following countries are considered within the scope: India, Kenya, South Africa, Zambia, Indonesia, Australia, Morocco, Singapore, Japan, Taiwan, New Zealand and Korea.
(7) The data also includes 14 de obra (temporary) work contracts for 2019 and 2018 in Latin America.
(8) Hiring rate = Total new recruits/Total workforce.
(9) Turnover rate = Total terminations/Total workforce.
(10) It should be noted that for GRI KPI 404 – 3, the calculation of the assessed percentage considers all Headcounts and not just those eligible by process for the denominator.
(11) Includes training relating to privacy, anti-bribery, community relations and diversity.
(12) Retention rate = loyalty index expressing the percentage of employees who remain in the organization over a given timeframe.
(13) Classification index = female managers + middle managers/total managers + middle managers.
(14) The 2019 and 2018 figures include a more specific determination of the amounts.
(15) The 2019 and 2020 figures only includes the procedures relating to Enel and retired staff, and not the procedures relating to third parties.
| GRI/ EUSS KPI |
UM | December 2020 December 2019 December 2018 | 2020-2019 | % | Scope | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 203-1 | INITIATIVES IN FAVOR OF THE COMMUNITY |
|||||||
| Contributions to communities - LBG method |
||||||||
| Charitable donations | (mil euros) | 32.7 | 4.6 | 5.7 | 28.1 | - | Enel | |
| Investments in communities | (mil euros) | 53.9 | 80.2 | 85.0 | -26.3 -32.8 | Enel | ||
| Commercial initiatives with a social impact |
(mil euros) | 17.5 | 37.4 | 23.8 | -19.9 -53.2 | Enel | ||
| Socially sustainable business initiatives (mil euros) | - | - | - | - | - | Enel | ||
| Total (expense + investments) | (mil euros) | 104.1 | 122.2 | 114.5 | -18.1 -14.8 | Enel | ||
| Enel Cuore Onlus | ||||||||
| Solidarity projects supported by Enel Cuore |
(no.) | 26 | 24 | 34 | 2 | 8.3 | Italy | |
| Sums provided to Enel Cuore Onlus by Enel Group companies |
(mil euros) | 23.3 | 5.5 | 5.4 | 17.8 | - | Italy | |
| Subscription fees | (mil euros) | 0.3 | 0.3 | 0.3 | - | - | Italy | |
| Extraordinary contribution from associates |
(mil euros) | - | 5.0 | 5.0 | -5.0 -100.0 | Italy | ||
| Tied donations | (mil euros) | 23.0 | 0.2 | 0.1 | 22.8 | - | Italy | |
| EU25 SAFETY FOR COMMUNITIES | ||||||||
| Third-party injuries | ||||||||
| Severe and fatal third-party injuries | (no.) | 221 | 247 | 90 | -26 | - | Enel | |
| - fatal | (no.) | 89 | 120 | 59 | -31 | - | Enel | |
| - severe | (no.) | 132 | 127 | 31 | 5 | - | Enel | |
| Third-party injuries by type | ||||||||
| Electricity injuries | (%) | 89.6 | 89.9 | 80.0 | -0.3 | - | Enel | |
| Road accidents against Group infrastructure |
(%) | 6.3 | 6.5 | 16.7 | -0.2 | - | Enel | |
| Accidents for other reasons (slipping, falling from height, crash-crush-cut) |
(%) | 4.1 | 3.6 | 3.3 | 0.5 | - | Enel | |
| Causes of electricity accident | ||||||||
| Construction activities near power lines (%) | 55.6 | 62.6 | 52.8 | -7.0 | - | Enel | ||
| Attempted theft | (%) | 9.6 | 15.8 | 29.2 | -6.2 | - | Enel | |
| Other (1) | (%) | 34.8 | 21.6 | 18.1 | 13.2 | - | Enel | |
(1) Mainly due to accidental contact with metal wires, agricultural work and plant cutting activities, among other things.

| GRI/ EUSS KPI |
UM | December 2020 December 2019 December 2018 | 2020-2019 | % | Scope | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DMA EU RESEARCH AND INNOVATION | ||||||||
| Technological innovation (1) | (mil euros) | 110.5 | 84.2 | 134.5 | 26.3 | 31.2 | Enel | |
| Research personnel | (no.) | 520.0 | 472.0 | 462.0 | 48.0 | 10.2 | Enel | |
| End users (final) | (no.) | 74,303,931 | 73,811,964 | 72,945,664 | 491,967 | 0.7 | Enel | |
| Active clients with smart meters (2) (3) | (no.) | 44,292,794 | 43,821,596 | 43.770,085 | 471,198 | 1.1 | Enel | |
| Active clients with smart meters/End users (final) |
(%) | 60.0 | 59.4 | 60.0 | 0.6 | - | Enel |
(1) Around 25% of investment in Research and Innovation concerned the Global Power Generation Line, while 53% was for the Infrastructure and Networks Line.
(2) The calculation criteria have been updated excluding electronic meters with an non-commissioned active contract. The 2019 figure has been adjusted to standardize data comparability.
(3) 2020 share for smart meter 2.0, amounting to 18.2 million.
| GRI/ EUSS KPI |
UM | December 2020 December 2019 December 2018 | 2020-2019 | % | Scope | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NATURE OF SUPPLIERS | ||||||||
| Number of suppliers with which a new contract was signed in the year |
(no.) | 24,012 | 29,370 | 31,434 | -5,358 -18.2 | Enel | ||
| 102-8 | Workforce of contracting and subcontracting companies (1) |
(no.) | 157,940 | 153,116 | 133,384 | 4,824 | 3.2 | Enel |
| Days worked by employees of contractors and subcontractors |
(,000 d) | 34,747 | 33,686 | 29,344 | 1,061 | 3.2 | Enel | |
| Construction activity | (,000 d) | 10,519 | 10,052 | 7,435 | 467 | 4.6 | Enel | |
| Operating and maintenance activity | (,000 d) | 24,228 | 23,633 | 21,909 | 594 | 2.5 | Enel | |
| - of which operating activity | (,000 d) | 7,268 | 7,090 | 6,573 | 178 | 2.5 | Enel | |
| - of which maintenance activity | (,000 d) | 16,959 | 16,543 | 15,337 | 416 | 2.5 | Enel | |
| 204-1 | Local suppliers of materials and services (2) |
(%) | ||||||
| Local suppliers with contracts > 1 mil euros |
(no.) | 1,326 | 1,167 | 1,403 | 159 | 13.6 | Enel | |
| Foreign suppliers with contracts > 1 mil euros |
(no.) | 182 | 157 | 197 | 25 | 15.9 | Enel | |
| Spending on local suppliers with contracts > 1 mil euros |
(mil euros) | 10,130 | 9,169 | 11,173 | 961 | 10.5 | Enel | |
| Spending on foreign suppliers with contracts > 1 mil euros |
(mil euros) | 1,657 | 1,130 | 1,912 | 527 | - | Enel | |
| Concentration of spending on local suppliers |
(%) | 86 | 89 | 85 | -3 | - | Enel | |
| Concentration of spending on foreign suppliers |
(%) | 14 | 11 | 15 | 3 | - | Enel | |
| Purchases and fuel | ||||||||
| Purchases of materials and services | (mil euros) | 14,070 | 14,375 | 15,073 | -305 | -2.1 | Enel | |
| Supplies | (mil euros) | 5,480 | 5,245 | 5,726 | 235 | 4.5 | Enel | |
| Works | (mil euros) | 3,625 | 3,702 | 3,656 | -77 | -2.1 | Enel | |
| Services | (mil euros) | 4,965 | 5,428 | 5,691 | -463 | -8.5 | Enel | |
| Fuel purchases | (mil euros) | 2,489 | 3,912 | 4,628 | -1,423 -36.4 | Enel | ||
| Gas | (mil euros) | 1,510 | 1,952 | 2,024 | -442 -22.6 | Enel | ||
| Oil | (mil euros) | 653 | 970 | 906 | -317 -32.7 | Enel | ||
| Coal/Lignite | (mil euros) | 321 | 976 | 1,698 | -655 -67.1 | Enel | ||
| Biomass | (mil euros) | 5 | 14 | - | -9 -64.3 | Enel | ||
| Management instruments | ||||||||
| Active qualified companies | (no.) | 16,124 | 8,198 | 6,300 | 7,926 96.7 | Enel | ||
| Online tenders as percentage of all tenders (3) |
(%) | 74.8 | 72.4 | 62.9 | 2.4 | - | Enel | |
| Online purchases as percentage of all purchases (3) |
(%) | 67.5 | 56.8 | 71.1 | 10.7 | - | Enel | |
| Use of prescription | (%) | 19.1 | 18.1 | 15.4 | 1.0 | - | Enel | |
| 103-2 Disputes involving suppliers | ||||||||
| Total proceedings | (no.) | 703 | 467 | 465 | 236 50.5 | Enel | ||
| Incidence of proceedings as defendant (%) | 69.3 | 80.7 | 77.8 | -11.4 | - | Enel |
(1) Calculated in FTE (Full Time Equivalent).
(2) "Local suppliers" are defined as suppliers with their registered office in the country where the supply contract was issued.
(3) The 2019 figures include a more specific determination thereof.

| GRI/ EUSS KPI |
UM | December 2020 December 2019 December 2018 | 2020-2019 | % | Scope | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SAFETY | ||||||||
| Lost Time Injuries Frequency Rate, LTIFR (1) Enel |
(i) | 0.12 | 0.18 | 0.19 | -0.06 -33.3 | Enel | ||
| Lost Time Injuries Frequency Rate, LTIFR (1) Contractors |
(i) | 0.10 | 0.13 | 0.17 | -0.03 -25.4 | Enel | ||
| Enel People | ||||||||
| 403-9 | Number of fatalities and frequency rate (2) |
|||||||
| Number of fatalities | (no.) | 1 | 1 | 1 | - | - | Enel | |
| Fatalities by geographical area | ||||||||
| Italy | (no.) | - | - | - | - | - | Italy | |
| Iberia | (no.) | - | 1 | - | -1 | - | Iberia | |
| Latin America | (no.) | - | - | 1 | - | - | America Latina |
|
| North | ||||||||
| North America | (no.) | 1 | - | - | - | - | America | |
| Europe | (no.) | - | - | - | - | - | Europe | |
| Africa, Asia and Oceania | (no.) | - | - | - | - | - | Africa, Asia and Oceania |
|
| Fatalities frequency rate | (i) | 0.008 | 0.008 | 0.009 | - | - | Enel | |
| Fatalities frequency rate by geographical area |
||||||||
| Italy | (i) | - | - | - | - | - | Italy | |
| Iberia | (i) | - | 0.059 | - | - | - | Iberia | |
| Latin America | (i) | 0.027 | - | 0.034 | 0.027 | - | America Latina |
|
| North | ||||||||
| North America | (i) | - | - | - | - | - | America | |
| Europe | (i) | - | - | - | - | - | Europe | |
| Africa, Asia and Oceania | (i) | - | - | - | - | - | Africa, Asia and Oceania |
|
| Number of "high-consequence" injuries (3) (excluding fatalities) and frequency rate (4) |
||||||||
| Number of "high-consequence" injuries |
(no.) | 3 | 3 | 4 | - | - | Enel | |
| Number of "high-consequence" injuries by geographical area |
||||||||
| Italy | (no.) | 1 | 2 | 2 | -1 -50.0 | Italy | ||
| Iberia | (no.) | - | - | - | - | - | Iberia | |
| Latin America | (no.) | - | - | 2 | - | - | Latin America |
| GRI/ EUSS KPI |
UM | December 2020 December 2019 December 2018 | 2020-2019 | % | Scope | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| North America | (no.) | - | - | - | - | - | North America |
|
| Europe | (no.) | 2 | 1 | - | 1 100.0 | Europe | ||
| Africa, Asia and Oceania | (no.) | - | - | - | - | - | Africa, Asia and Oceania |
|
| "High-consequence" injuries frequency rate |
(i) | 0.024 | 0.023 | 0.035 | 0.001 | 4.3 | Enel | |
| "High-consequence" injuries frequency rate by geographical area |
||||||||
| Italy | (i) | 0.018 | 0.037 | 0.037 | -0.019 -51.4 | Italy | ||
| Iberia | (i) | - | - | - | - | - | Iberia | |
| Latin America | (i) | - | - | 0.069 | - | - | Latin America |
|
| North America | (i) | - | - | - | - | - | North America |
|
| Europe | (i) | 0.196 | 0.094 | - | 0.102 | - | Europe | |
| Africa, Asia and Oceania | (i) | - | - | - | - | - | Africa, Asia and Oceania |
|
| Total number of injuries (5) and frequency rate (6) |
||||||||
| Number of injuries | (no.) | 75 | 116 | 108 | -41 -35.3 | Enel | ||
| Injuries by geographical area | ||||||||
| Italy | (no.) | 42 | 59 | 60 | -17 -28.8 | Italy | ||
| Iberia | (no.) | 2 | 6 | 6 | -4 -66.7 | Iberia | ||
| Latin America | (no.) | 26 | 46 | 41 | -20 -43.5 | Latin America |
||
| North America | (no.) | - | - | - | - | - | North America |
|
| Europe and Norh Africa | (no.) | 5 | 5 | 1 | - | - | Europe | |
| Africa, Asia and Oceania | (no.) | - | - | - | - | - | Africa, Asia and Oceania |
|
| Injury frequency rate | (i) | 0.599 | 0.899 | 0.943 | -0.300 -33.4 | Enel | ||
| Frequency rate by geographical area | ||||||||
| Italy | (i) | 0.752 | 1.106 | 1.103 | -0.354 -32.0 | Italy | ||
| Iberia | (i) | 0.117 | 0.352 | 0.366 | -0.235 -66.8 | Iberia | ||
| Latin America | (i) | 0.688 | 1.049 | 1.408 | -0.361 -34.4 | Latin America |
||
| North America | (i) | - | - | - | - | - | North America |
|
| Europe | (i) | 0.491 | 0.472 | 0.098 | 0.019 | 4.0 | Europe | |
| Africa, Asia and Oceania | (i) | - | - | - | - | - | Africa, Asia and Oceania |
|
| Worked hours | (no.) | 125,263,914 | 129,068,627 | 114,552,443 | -3,804,713 | -2.9 | Enel | |
| 403-9 Contractors | ||||||||
| Number of fatalities and frequency rate (1) |
||||||||
| Number of fatalities (7) | (no.) | 8 | 6 | 7 | 2 33.3 | Enel | ||
| Fatalities by geographical area | ||||||||
| Italy | (no.) | 1 | 1 | 2 | - | - | Italy | |
| Iberia | (no.) | 1 | - | - | - | - | Iberia | |
| North and Central America | (no.) | - | - | - | - | - | North and Central America |

| EUSS KPI | UM | December 2020 December 2019 December 2018 | 2020-2019 | % | Scope | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Europe | (no.) | - | 1 | - | -1 -100.0 | Europe | |
| Africa, Asia and Oceania | (no.) | - | - | - | - | - | Africa, Asia and Oceania |
| Latin | |||||||
| Latin America | (i) | 6 | 4 | 5 | 2 50.0 | America | |
| Fatalities frequency rate | (i) | 0.029 | 0.022 | 0.030 | 0.007 | 31.8 | Enel |
| Fatalities frequency rate by geographical area |
|||||||
| Italy | (i) | 0.022 | 0.024 | 0.049 | -0.002 | -8.3 | Italy |
| Iberia | (i) | 0.027 | - | - | 0.027 | - | Iberia |
| Latin America | (i) | 0.036 | 0.026 | 0.038 | 0.010 38.5 | Latin America |
|
| North and Central America | (i) | - | - | - | - | - | North America |
| Europe | (i) | - | 0.061 | - | -0.061 -100.0 | Europe | |
| Africa, Asia and Oceania | (i) | - | - | - | - | - | Africa, Asia and Oceania |
| Number of "high-consequence" injuries (3) (excluding fatalities) and frequency rate (4) |
|||||||
| Number of "high-consequence" injuries |
(no.) | 20 | 16 | 13 | 4 | 25.0 | Enel |
| Number of "high-consequence" injuries by geographical area |
|||||||
| Italy | (no.) | 3 | 5 | 2 | -2 -40.0 | Italy | |
| Iberia | (no.) | 3 | 3 | 4 | - | - | Iberia |
| Latin America | (no.) | 14 | 4 | 6 | 10 | - | Latin America |
| North America | (no.) | - | 4 | - | -4 -100.0 | North America |
|
| Europe | (no.) | - | - | - | - | - | Europe |
| Africa, Asia and Oceania | (no.) | - | - | - | - | - | Africa, Asia and Oceania |
| "High-consequence" injuries frequency rate |
(i) | 0.072 | 0.059 | 0.051 | 0.013 | 22.0 | Enel |
| "High-consequence" injuries frequency rate by geographical area |
|||||||
| Italy | (i) | 0.065 | 0.120 | 0.049 | -0.055 -45.8 | Italy | |
| Iberia | (i) | 0.081 | 0.072 | 0.101 | 0.009 | 12.5 | Iberia |
| Latin America | (i) | 0.083 | 0.026 | 0.045 | 0.057 | - | Latin America |
| North America | (i) | - | 0.419 | - | -0.419 -100.0 | Nord America |
|
| Europe | (i) | - | - | - | - | - | Europe |
| Africa, Asia and Oceania | (i) | - | - | - | - | - | Africa, Asia and Oceania |
| Total number of injuries (5) and frequency rate (6) |
|||||||
| Number of injuries (7) | (no.) | 135 | 176 | 205 | -41 -23.3 | Enel | |
| Injuries by geographical area | |||||||
| Italy | (no.) | 39 | 42 | 56 | -3 | -7.1 | Italy |
| Iberia | (no.) | 18 | 32 | 34 | -14 -43.8 | Iberia | |
| Latin America | (no.) | 77 | 90 | 111 | -13 -14.4 | Latin America |
|
| North America | (no.) | 1 | 7 | 1 | -6 -85.7 | North America |
|
| Europe | (no.) | - | 5 | 3 | -5 -100.0 | Europe |
| Scope | % | 2020-2019 | December 2020 December 2019 December 2018 | UM | GRI/ EUSS KPI |
|||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Africa, Asia and Oceania |
- | - | - | - | - | (no.) | Africa, Asia and Oceania | |
| Enel | -0.167 -25.6 | 0.873 | 0.653 | 0.486 | (i) | Injury frequency rate | ||
| Frequency rate by geographical area | ||||||||
| Italy | -0.166 -16.5 | 1.367 | 1.008 | 0.842 | (i) | Italy | ||
| Iberia | -0.287 -37.2 | 0.859 | 0.772 | 0.485 | (i) | Iberia | ||
| Latin America |
-0.117 -20.4 | 0.839 | 0.574 | 0.457 | (i) | Latin America | ||
| North America |
-0.571 -77.9 | 0.276 | 0.733 | 0.162 | (i) | North America | ||
| Europe and North Africa |
-0.304 -100.0 | 0.175 | 0.304 | - | (i) | Europe | ||
| Africa, Asia and Oceania |
- | - | - | - | - | (i) | Africa, Asia and Oceania | |
| Enel | 3.2 | 8,491,739 | 234,755,218 | 269,484,178 | 277,975,917 | (no.) | Hours worked |
(1) The Lost Time Injuries Frequency Rate (LTIFR) is calculated by proportioning the number of injuries with hours worked*200,000.
(2) This rate is calculated by proportioning the number of fatal accidents with hours worked/1,000,000.
(3) Sum of: injuries that, as of December 31, 2020 resulted in more than 6 months of absence from work; of those that remain open, injuries considered severe (initial prognosis > 30 days); injuries categorized as "Life Changing Accidents" (LCA), regardless of the number of days of absence from work related to them.
(4) This rate is calculated by proportioning the number of "High Consequence" accidents with hours worked/1,000,000.
(5) Includes all accident events (including those with 3 days of absence or fewer).
(6) This rate is calculated by proportioning the number of injuries with hours worked/1,000,000.
(7) Considering all areas where the Group operates and the activities managed, including companies consolidated using the equity method and companies for which the BSO (Build, Sell and Operate) mechanism has been applied, the total value of fatal accidents in 2018 is 8.

| GRI/ EUSS KPI |
UM | December 2020 December 2019 December 2018 | 2020-2019 | % | Scope | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 102-5 SHAREHOLDERS | ||||||||
| Composition of shareholdings | ||||||||
| Investors (1) | ||||||||
| Ministry of Economy and Finance | (%) | 23.6 | 23.6 | 23.6 | - | - | Enel SpA | |
| Institutional investors | (%) | 62.3 | 60.3 | 57.6 | 2.0 | - | Enel SpA | |
| Retail shareholders | (%) | 14.1 | 16.1 | 18.8 | -2.0 | - | Enel SpA | |
| Location of institutional investors | ||||||||
| Italy | (%) | 6.7 | 5.8 | 6.8 | 0.9 | - | Enel SpA | |
| UK | (%) | 13.3 | 13.7 | 16.0 | -0.4 | - | Enel SpA | |
| Rest of Europe | (%) | 27.2 | 26.2 | 28.9 | 1.0 | - | Enel SpA | |
| North America | (%) | 46.4 | 46.7 | 40.9 | -0.3 | - | Enel SpA | |
| Rest of the world | (%) | 6.4 | 7.6 | 7.4 | -1.2 | - | Enel SpA | |
| Concentration index (top 50) | (%) | 42.3 | 39.4 | 37.6 | 2.9 | - | Enel SpA | |
| Investment style of institutional investors |
||||||||
| Long Only | (%) | 71.2 | 73.0 | 83.4 | -1.8 | - | Enel SpA | |
| Index | (%) | 12.7 | 12.9 | 9.3 | -0.2 | - | Enel SpA | |
| Hedge | (%) | 0.3 | 0.8 | 6.9 | -0.5 | - | Enel SpA | |
| Other | (%) | 15.8 | 13.3 | 0.4 | 2.5 | - | Enel SpA | |
| Socially Responsible Investors (SRI) | ||||||||
| Presence of SRI | (no.) | 244 | 182 | 169 | 62 34.1 | Enel SpA | ||
| Enel shares held by SRI funds | (mil.) | 1,482 | 1,095 | 1,064 | 387 35.3 | Enel SpA | ||
| Weight of SRI funds in institutional shareholdings (2) |
(%) | 23.4 | 20.1 | 20.6 | 3.3 | - | Enel SpA | |
| Location of SRI investors (3) | ||||||||
| Italy | (%) | 14.5 | 5.3 | 1.4 | 9.2 | - | Enel SpA | |
| UK | (%) | 11.7 | 11.4 | 13.2 | 0.3 | - | Enel SpA | |
| Rest of Europe | (%) | 40.9 | 42.3 | 51.0 | -1.4 | - | Enel SpA | |
| North America | (%) | 26.6 | 36.7 | 32.8 | -10.1 | - | Enel SpA | |
| Rest of the world | (%) | 6.2 | 4.3 | 1.6 | 1.9 | - | Enel SpA | |
| Share price performance | ||||||||
| Financial performance of the share (4) | ||||||||
| ENEL | (%) | 17.0 | 40.2 | -1.7 | -23.2 | - | Enel SpA | |
| FTSEMib | (%) | -5.4 | 28.3 | -16.1 | -33.7 | - | Enel SpA | |
| Endesa | (%) | -6.1 | 21.1 | 11.6 | -27.2 | - | Endesa | |
| Enel Americas (formerly Enersis) | (%) | -30.5 | 36.3 | -10.6 | -66.8 | - Enel Américas | ||
| Enel Chile | (%) | -21.7 | 5.3 | -8.0 | -27.0 | - | Enel Chile | |
| Enel Russia | (%) | -2.4 | -9.1 | -30.0 | 6.7 | - | Enel Russia | |
| Ibex 35 | (%) | -15.5 | 12.6 | -15.4 | -28.1 | - | Enel SpA | |
| MICEX | (%) | 8.0 | 29.3 | 11.8 | -21.3 | - | Enel SpA | |
| IPSA | (%) | -10.5 | -8.5 | -8.3 | -2.0 | - | Enel SpA |
GRI/

| EUSS KPI | UM | December 2020 December 2019 December 2018 | 2020-2019 | % | Scope | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return for the shareholder | ||||||||
| (cent | ||||||||
| DPS (Dividend Per Share) | euro) | 0.36 | 0.33 | 0.28 | 0.03 | 9.1 | Enel SpA | |
| TSR (Total Shareholder Return) from IPO (accumulated) |
(%) | 281.2 | 212.7 | 112.4 | 68.5 | - | Enel SpA | |
| TSR from IPO (annualized) | (%) | 6.5 | 5.8 | 4.0 | 0.7 | - | Enel SpA | |
| TSR last 2 years (accumulated) | (%) | 79.4 | 51.7 | 31.4 | 27.7 | - | Enel SpA | |
| TSR last 2 years (annualized) | (%) | 33.9 | 23.2 | 14.7 | 10.7 | - | Enel SpA | |
| Communication to shareholders | ||||||||
| Information requests from retail | ||||||||
| 102-43 | shareholders (5) | (no.) | 40 | 41 | 75 | -1 | -2.4 | Enel SpA |
| LENDERS | ||||||||
| Debt | ||||||||
| Total debt | (mil euros) | 45,415 | 45,175 | 41,089 | 240 | 0.5 | Enel | |
| Debt to Equity | (i) | 1.1 | 1.0 | 0.9 | 0.1 11.5 | Enel | ||
| Rating | ||||||||
| S&P | (i) | BBB+ | BBB+ | BBB+ | - | - | Enel | |
| Outlook | (i) | Stable Outlook | Stable Outlook | Stable Outlook | - | - | Enel | |
| Moody's | (i) | Baa2 | Baa2 | Baa2 | - | - | Enel | |
| Outlook | (i) | Positive | Positive | Stable Outlook | - | - | Enel | |
| Fitch | (i) | A- | A- | A- | - | - | Enel | |
| Outlook | (i) | Stable Outlook | Stable Outlook | Stable Outlook | - | - | Enel | |
| 405-1 CORPORATE GOVERNANCE | ||||||||
| Board of Directors (BoD) | ||||||||
| Members of BoD by type | (no.) | 9 | 9 | 9 | - | - | Enel SpA | |
| Executive members | (no.) | 1 | 1 | 1 | - | - | Enel SpA | |
| Non-executive members | (no.) | 8 | 8 | 8 | - | - | Enel SpA | |
| - of whom independent (6) | (no.) | 7 | 7 | 7 | - | - | Enel SpA | |
| Women on BoD of the Group | ||||||||
| Women on the BoD of Enel SpA | (no.) | 4 | 3 | 3 | 1 33.3 | Enel SpA | ||
| Women on the BoD of Group | ||||||||
| companies | (no.) | 208 | 181 | 215 | 27 | 14.9 | Enel | |
| Members of the BoD by age group | ||||||||
| Under 30 years old | (%) | - | - | - | - | - | Enel SpA | |
| 30 - 50 years old | (%) | 22 | - | 11 | - | - | Enel SpA | |
| Over 50 years old | (%) | 78 | 100 | 89 | -22 | - | Enel SpA | |
| BoD meetings | (no.) | 16 | 14 | 18 | 2 | 14.3 | Enel SpA | |
| 103-2 Implementation of the Code of Ethics | ||||||||
| Reports received by type of stakeholder |
(no.) | 151 | 166 | 144 | -15 | -9.0 | Enel | |
| Internal stakeholders | (no.) | 25 | 30 | 25 | -5 -16.7 | Enel | ||
| External stakeholders | (no.) | 22 | 23 | 40 | -1 | -4.3 | Enel | |
| Anonymous | (no.) | 104 | 113 | 79 | -9 | -8.0 | Enel | |
| Reports received for harmed or | ||||||||
| potentially harmed stakeholder | (no.) | 151 | 166 | 144 | -15 | -9.0 | Enel | |
| Shareholder | (no.) | 55 | 66 | 67 | -11 -16.7 | Enel | ||
| Customer | (no.) | 3 | 7 | 12 | -4 -57.1 | Enel | ||
| Employee | (no.) | 64 | 69 | 45 | -5 | -7.2 | Enel | |
| General public | (no.) | 5 | 9 | 3 | -4 -44.4 | Enel | ||
| Suppliers | (no.) | 24 | 15 | 17 | 9 60.0 | Enel | ||
| Reports received by status | (no.) | 151 | 166 | 144 | -15 | -9.0 | Enel | |
| Return for the shareholder | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DPS (Dividend Per Share) | (cent euro) |
0.36 | 0.33 | 0.28 | 0.03 | 9.1 | Enel SpA | |
| TSR (Total Shareholder Return) from IPO (accumulated) |
(%) | 281.2 | 212.7 | 112.4 | 68.5 | - | Enel SpA | |
| TSR from IPO (annualized) | (%) | 6.5 | 5.8 | 4.0 | 0.7 | - | Enel SpA | |
| TSR last 2 years (accumulated) | (%) | 79.4 | 51.7 | 31.4 | 27.7 | - | Enel SpA | |
| TSR last 2 years (annualized) | (%) | 33.9 | 23.2 | 14.7 | 10.7 | - | Enel SpA | |
| Communication to shareholders | ||||||||
| 102-43 | Information requests from retail shareholders (5) |
(no.) | 40 | 41 | 75 | -1 | -2.4 | Enel SpA |
| LENDERS | ||||||||
| Debt | ||||||||
| Total debt | (mil euros) | 45,415 | 45,175 | 41,089 | 240 | 0.5 | Enel | |
| Debt to Equity | (i) | 1.1 | 1.0 | 0.9 | 0.1 11.5 | Enel | ||
| Rating | ||||||||
| S&P | (i) | BBB+ | BBB+ | BBB+ | - | - | Enel | |
| Outlook | (i) | Stable Outlook | Stable Outlook | Stable Outlook | - | - | Enel | |
| Moody's | (i) | Baa2 | Baa2 | Baa2 | - | - | Enel | |
| Outlook | (i) | Positive | Positive | Stable Outlook | - | - | Enel | |
| Fitch | (i) | A- | A- | A- | - | - | Enel | |
| Outlook | (i) | Stable Outlook | Stable Outlook | Stable Outlook | - | - | Enel | |
| 405-1 CORPORATE GOVERNANCE | ||||||||
| Board of Directors (BoD) | ||||||||
| Members of BoD by type | (no.) | 9 | 9 | 9 | - | - | Enel SpA | |
| Executive members | (no.) | 1 | 1 | 1 | - | - | Enel SpA | |
| Non-executive members | (no.) | 8 | 8 | 8 | - | - | Enel SpA | |
| - of whom independent (6) | (no.) | 7 | 7 | 7 | - | - | Enel SpA | |
| Women on BoD of the Group | ||||||||
| Women on the BoD of Enel SpA | (no.) | 4 | 3 | 3 | 1 33.3 | Enel SpA | ||
| Women on the BoD of Group companies |
(no.) | 208 | 181 | 215 | 27 | 14.9 | Enel | |
| Members of the BoD by age group | ||||||||
| Under 30 years old | (%) | - | - | - | - | - | Enel SpA | |
| 30 - 50 years old | (%) | 22 | - | 11 | - | - | Enel SpA | |
| Over 50 years old | (%) | 78 | 100 | 89 | -22 | - | Enel SpA | |
| BoD meetings | (no.) | 16 | 14 | 18 | 2 | 14.3 | Enel SpA | |
| 103-2 Implementation of the Code of Ethics | ||||||||
| Reports received by type of stakeholder |
(no.) | 151 | 166 | 144 | -15 | -9.0 | Enel | |
| Internal stakeholders | (no.) | 25 | 30 | 25 | -5 -16.7 | Enel | ||
| External stakeholders | (no.) | 22 | 23 | 40 | -1 | -4.3 | Enel | |
| Anonymous | (no.) | 104 | 113 | 79 | -9 | -8.0 | Enel | |
| Reports received for harmed or | ||||||||
| potentially harmed stakeholder | (no.) | 151 | 166 | 144 | -15 | -9.0 | Enel | |
| Shareholder | (no.) | 55 | 66 | 67 | -11 -16.7 | Enel | ||
| Customer | (no.) | 3 | 7 | 12 | -4 -57.1 | Enel | ||
| Employee | (no.) | 64 | 69 | 45 | -5 | -7.2 | Enel | |
| General public | (no.) | 5 | 9 | 3 | -4 -44.4 | Enel | ||
| Suppliers | (no.) | 24 | 15 | 17 | 9 60.0 | Enel | ||
| Reports received by status | (no.) | 151 | 166 | 144 | -15 | -9.0 | Enel | |
| Reports being assessed | (no.) | 4 | - | - | 4 | - | Enel |
| GRI/ EUSS KPI |
UM | December 2020 December 2019 December 2018 | 2020-2019 | % | Scope | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reports for which a violation has not been confirmed |
(no.) | 121 | 128 | 113 | -7 | -5.5 | Enel | |
| Reports for which a violation has been confirmed |
(no.) | 26 | 38 | 31 | -12 -31.6 | Enel | ||
| Reports related to | (no.) | 151 | 166 | 144 | -15 | -9.0 | Enel | |
| Conflict of interests/Bribery/Corruption (no.) | 25 | 35 | 33 | -10 -28.6 | Enel | |||
| Misappropriation | (no.) | 29 | 34 | 42 | -5 -14.7 | Enel | ||
| Work practices | (no.) | 79 | 74 | 38 | 5 | 6.8 | Enel | |
| Community and society | (no.) | 4 | 3 | - | 1 33.3 | Enel | ||
| Other reasons | (no.) | 14 | 20 | 31 | -6 -30.0 | Enel | ||
| Violations confirmed by type of harmed stakeholder (7) |
(no.) | 26 | 38 | 31 | -12 -31.6 | Enel | ||
| Shareholder | (no.) | 17 | 20 | 19 | -3 -15.0 | Enel | ||
| Customer | (no.) | - | 1 | - | -1 -100.0 | Enel | ||
| Employee | (no.) | 5 | 10 | 8 | -5 -50.0 | Enel | ||
| General public | (no.) | 1 | 2 | - | -1 -50.0 | Enel | ||
| Suppliers | (no.) | 3 | 5 | 4 | -2 -40.0 | Enel | ||
| 103-2; | 406-1 Violations related to incidents of (7) | (no.) | 26 | 38 | 31 | -12 -31.6 | Enel | |
| 205-3 Conflict of interests/Bribery/Corruption (8) (no.) | 2 | 10 | 10 | -8 -80.0 | Enel | |||
| Misappropriation | (no.) | 14 | 11 | 7 | 3 | 27.3 | Enel | |
| Work practices | (no.) | 9 | 11 | 8 | -2 -18.2 | Enel | ||
| Community and society | (no.) | - | - | - | - | - | Enel | |
| Other reasons | (no.) | 1 | 6 | 6 | -5 -83.3 | Enel | ||
| Violations regarding incidents of conflict of interest/corruption, by |
||||||||
| country | (no.) | 2 | 8 | 10 | -6 -75.0 | Enel | ||
| Argentina | (no.) | - | - | 1 | - | - | Argentina | |
| Brazil | (no.) | 2 | 2 | 1 | - | - | Brazil | |
| Chile | (no.) | - | 2 | 4 | -2 -100.0 | Chile | ||
| Colombia | (no.) | - | 1 | 1 | -1 -100.0 | Colombia | ||
| Italy | (no.) | - | - | 1 | - | - | Italy | |
| Peru | (no.) | - | 1 | - | -1 -100.0 | Peru | ||
| Romania | (no.) | - | 1 | - | - | - | Romania | |
| Russia | (no.) | - | - | 2 | - | - | Russia | |
| Spain | (no.) | - | 1 | - | - | - | Spagna | |
| Actions taken in response to incidents of conflict of interest/corruption |
(no.) | 2 | 15 | 13 | -13 -86.7 | Enel | ||
| - of which: actions taken against employees in response to cases of conflict of interest/corruption |
(no.) | 2 | 9 | 7 | -7 -77.8 | Enel | ||
| - of which: actions taken against contractors in response to cases of |
||||||||
| 412-3 | conflict of interest/corruption Significant investment agreements that include human rights clauses (9) |
(no.) (no.) |
- - |
6 4 |
6 9 |
-6 -100.0 -4 -100.0 |
Enel Enel |
|
| Percentage of significant investment | ||||||||
| 412-3 | agreements that include human rights clauses |
(%) | - | 100 | 100 | - | - | Enel |
| INSTITUTIONAL RELATIONS | ||||||||
| 201-4 Grants (10) | ||||||||
| Grants supplied in the period by geographic area (11) |
(mil euros) | 6.7 | 11.2 | 83.2 | -4.5 -40.1 | Enel | ||
| Italy | (mil euros) | 4.7 | 8.3 | 81.8 | -3.6 -42.8 | Italy | ||
| Slovakia (11) | (mil euros) | - | - | - | - | - | Slovacchia |
| GRI/ EUSS KPI |
UM | December 2020 December 2019 December 2018 | 2020-2019 | % | Scope | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Spain | (mil euros) | 0.5 | 1.7 | 0.9 | 0.8 88.9 | Spagna | ||
| Brazil | (mil euros) | - | - | - | - | - | Brazil | |
| Colombia | (mil euros) | 1.0 | 1.0 | 0.5 | - | -3.4 | Colombia | |
| Chile | (mil euros) | 0.5 | 0.2 | - | 0.3 | 3.2 | Chile | |
| Grants received by destination (11) | (%) | |||||||
| Energy networks | (%) | 55.0 | 40.3 | 88.8 | 14.7 | - | Enel | |
| R&D | (%) | 29.6 | 56.2 | 1.3 | -26.6 | - | Enel | |
| Renewable | (%) | 14.3 | 14.3 | 2.4 | - | - | Enel | |
| Training | (%) | - | - | - | - | - | Enel | |
| Other | (no.) | 1.1 | - | 7.6 | 1.1 | - | Enel | |
| Number of projects which received grants |
46 | 40 | 88 | 6 | 15.0 | Enel | ||
| Loans granted by the EIB and others | ||||||||
| Remaining debt on loans from EIB and | ||||||||
| others by geographic area (12) | (mil euros) | 6,314 | 6,550 | 6,279 | -236 | -3.6 | Enel | |
| - Italy | (mil euros) | 3,735 | 3,755 | 3,760 | -20 | -0.5 | Italy | |
| - Abroad (Latin America, Spain, Slovakia, Russia, Romania) |
(mil euros) | 2,579 | 2,795 | 2,519 | -216 | -7.7 | Enel | |
| Remaining debt on loans from EIB and others by destination (12) |
||||||||
| Energy networks | (%) | 62.9 | 61.4 | 66.9 | 1.5 | - | Enel | |
| R&D | (%) | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.1 | - | - | Enel | |
| Renewable | (%) | 34.5 | 36.6 | 29.7 | -2.1 | - | Enel | |
| Training | (%) | - | - | - | - | - | Enel | |
| Other | (%) | 2.6 | 1.9 | 3.2 | 0.7 | - | Enel | |
| Number of projects in progress | ||||||||
| approved with loans from EIB and others |
(no.) | 138 | 162 | 171 | -24 -14.8 | Enel |
(1) The institutional investor is an entity that, under a specific mandate or on their own account, undertakes equity and/or property investment on a continuous and professional basis. The category includes: mutual funds, pension funds, hedge funds, investment and merchant banks, insurance companies.
(2) Calculated comparing the number of shares held by identified Socially Responsible Investors (SRIs) with the number of shares held by identified institutional investors. (3) SRIs are investors who state that they include environmental, social and governance (ESG) factors in their traditional financial analyses in order to guide their investment decisions (inclusion of at least one ESG criterion and adhesion to the main international principles approved by organizations such as UNPRI, UKSIF, EUROSIF are among
the key factors in order to classify an investor as an SRI).
(4) Calculated as the difference between the valuation on the last open market day of the year and the valuation of the previous year.
(5) Only requests received have been considered, not the responses provided.
(6) The number of independent directors pursuant to the Consolidated Law on Finance (TUF) is 8 (including the Chairman). The number of independent directors pursuant to the Corporate Governance Code is 7 because the Code does not allow the Chairman to be considered independent since he/she is a "senior representative" of the company.
(7) In 2020, the analysis of reports received in 2019 was completed, hence the number of confirmed violations for 2019 was revised from 36 to 38. The two additional violations are to be ascribed to minor cases of private interest in Brazil.
(8) Corruption consists of the abuse of power with the goal of private gain and can be instigated by individuals in the public or private sector. It is interpreted here as including corrupt practices such as bribery, fraud, extortion, collusion, conflicts of interest and money laundering.
(9) No agreement significant for this reporting was entered into in 2020.
(10) Non-repayable loans do not have a linear or foreseeable trend; while a significant grant was given in 2018, this did not occur in 2019 as only minor projects were set out. (11) (The 2019 figures have been updated. Specifically, in Chile and Colombia, projects not previously considered in the scope of reference have been included. In terms of Italy, the decrease is due to an adjustment on several projects.
(12) The 2019 figures have been updated. Specifically, in Italy, a deviation occurred, which mainly includes adjustments and projects not mapped in a residual manner. Brazil shows a reduction due to the exchange rate applied.

| Omission | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GRI Standards | Disclosure | Page number(s) and/or URL(s) | Part Omitted | Reason | Explanation | ||
| GRI 101: Foundation 2016 | |||||||
| General Disclosures | |||||||
| Organizational profile | |||||||
| 102-1 Name of the organization | 312 | ||||||
| 102-2 Activities, brands, prod ucts, and services |
10-11 | ||||||
| 102-3 Location of headquarters | 312 | ||||||
| 102-4 Location of operations | 10-11 | ||||||
| 102-5 Ownership and legal form | 10-11, 236, 312, Sustainability Statement, sec. Sound governance |
||||||
| 102-6 Markets served | 10-11, Sustainability Statement, sec. Electification, digital and platforms, |
||||||
| 102-7 Scale of the organization | 10-11, 90, 106, Sustainability Statement, sec. At a Glance, Our people, Sustainable supply chain |
||||||
| GRI 102: General Disclosures 2016 |
102-8 Information on employees and other workers |
Sustainability Statement, sec. At a Glance, Our people, Sustain able supply chain |
|||||
| 102-9 Supply chain | 184-185, 192 | ||||||
| 102-10 Significant changes to the organization and its supply chain |
184, 323-324 | ||||||
| 102-11 Precautionary Principle or approach |
25, 241-242 | ||||||
| 102-12 External initiatives | 18-19, 48-51, 252 | ||||||
| 102-13 Membership of associ ations |
18-19, 48-51 | ||||||
| Strategy | |||||||
| 102-14 Statement from senior decision-maker |
3 | ||||||
| 102-15 Key impacts, risks, and opportunities |
10-11, 25, 26-28, 32-35, 38-40, 55-56, 63-65, 65-74, 86-89, 104-105, 122, 144, 154-155, 168- 169, 182-183, 194, 206-207, 212, 234-235, 239, 241-251, 252-253 |
GRI 102: General Disclosures 2016
| E-MARKET SDIR |
|---|
| CERTIFIED |
| ainability und gover- |
|---|
| 239 |
| 239 |
| 239 |
| 239 |
| 41-251 |
| 2-315 |
| ement, sec. |
| 316-318 |
| Ethics and integrity | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 102-16 Values, principles, stan dards, and norms of behavior |
98-100, 252-254 | |||
| 102-17 Mechanisms for advice and concerns about ethics |
96, 252-254, Sustainability Statement sec. Sound gover nance |
|||
| Governance | ||||
| 102-18 Governance structure | 16-17, 52-55, 236-239 | |||
| 102-19 Delegating authority | 16-17, 52-55, 236-239 | |||
| 102-20 Executive-level responsi bility for economic, environmen tal, and social topics |
16-17, 52-55, 236-239 | |||
| 102-21 Consulting stakeholders on economic, environmental, and social topics |
236-237 | |||
| 102-22 Composition of the highest governance body and its committees |
236-239 | |||
| 102-23 Chair of the highest gov ernance body |
236-239 | |||
| 102-24 Nominating and select ing the highest governance body 236-239 |
||||
| 102-25 Conflicts of interest | 241-242, 262-264 | |||
| 102-26 Role of highest gover nance body in setting purpose, values, and strategy |
16-17, 52-55, 236-239 | |||
| 102-27 Collective knowledge of highest governance body |
236-239 | |||
| 102-28 Evaluating the highest governance body's performance 236-242 |
||||
| 102-29 Identifying and manag ing economic, environmental, and social impacts |
16-17, 25, 52-54, 241-251 | |||
| 102-30 Effectiveness of risk management processes |
25, 52-54, 241-251 | |||
| 102-32 Highest governance body's role in sustainability re porting |
16-17, 236-239, 312-315 | |||
| 102-33 Communicating critical concerns |
237-240, 262-264 | |||
| 102-35 Remuneration policies | 52-55, 239-241 | |||
| 102-36 Process for determining remuneration |
52-55, 239-241 | |||
| Stakeholder engagement | ||||
| 102-40 List of stakeholder groups |
26-31, 315-318 | |||
| 102-41 Collective bargaining agreements |
Sustainability Statement, sec. Our people |
|||
| 102-42 Identifying and selecting stakeholders |
124-127, 134-143, 316-318 |
102-55
| 102-43 Approach to stakeholder engagement |
30-31, 95-98, 113, 124-127, 134- 143, 236-237, 316-319, Sustainability Statement, sec. Electification, digital and plat - forms, sec. Sound governance |
||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 102-44 Key topics and concerns raised |
26-27, 95-98, 124-127, 134-143 Sustainability Statement, sec. Electification, digital and plat - forms |
||||
| Reporting practice | |||||
| 102-45 Entities included in the consolidated financial state - ments |
312, 323-324 | ||||
| 102-46 Defining report content and topic boundaries |
30-31, 312-321 | ||||
| 102-47 List of material topics | 30-31, 312-321 | ||||
| 102-48 Restatements of infor - mation |
312, 323-324 | ||||
| GRI 102: General Disclosures 2016 |
102-49 Changes in reporting | 312, 323-324 | |||
| 102-50 Reporting period | 312, 323-324 | ||||
| 102-51 Date of most recent report |
312 | ||||
| 102-52 Reporting cycle | 312 | ||||
| 102-53 Contact point for ques - tions regarding the report |
312 | ||||
| 102-54 Claims of reporting in accordance with the GRI Stan - dards |
312-315 | ||||
| 102-55 GRI content index | 312, Content Index | ||||
| 102-56 External assurance | 322, 326-328 | ||||
| Omission | |||||
| GRI Standard | Disclosure | Page number(s) and/or URL(s) | Part Omitted | Reason | Explanation |
| Material Topics | |||||
| 200 series (Economic topics) | |||||
| Economic Performance | |||||
| 103-1 Explanation of the material topic and its boundary |
26-31, 315-321 | ||||
| GRI 103: Management Approach 2016 |
103-2 The management ap - proach and its components |
40-42, 55-62, 63-65, 65-74, 241-244 |
|||
| 103-3 Evaluation of the manage - ment approach |
55-62, 63-65, 65-74, 241-244 | ||||
| 201-1 Direct economic value generated and distributed |
10-11, Sustainability Statement sec. At a glance |
||||
| GRI 201: Economic Per - |
201-2 Financial implications and other risks and opportunities due to climate change |
25, 40-42, 55-62, 63-65, 65-74, 241-244 |
|||
| formance 2016 | 201-3 Defined benefit plan ob - ligations and other retirement |
Sustainability Statement sec. Our people |
|||
| plans |
| Procurement Practices | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| 103-1 Explanation of the material topic and its boundary |
26-31, 315-321 | ||
| GRI 103: Management Approach 2016 |
103-2 The management ap - proach and its components |
184-193 | |
| 103-3 Evaluation of the manage - ment approach |
184-193 | ||
| GRI 204: Procurement Practices 2016 |
204-1 Proportion of spending on local suppliers |
Sustainability Statement sec. Sustainable supply chain |
|
| Anti-corruption | |||
| 103-1 Explanation of the material topic and its boundary |
26-31, 315-321 | ||
| 103-2 The management ap - proach and its components |
241-251, 262-264 | ||
| 103-3 Evaluation of the manage - ment approach |
241-251, 262-264 | ||
| GRI 103: Management Approach 2016 |
205-2 Communication and training about anti-corruption policies and procedures |
262-264 | |
| 205-3 Confirmed incidents of corruption and actions taken |
262-264 Sustainability Statement sec. Sound governance Besides the information on reports concerning the Code of Ethics, no other events are indicated |
||
| Anti-competitive Behavior | |||
| 103-1 Explanation of the material topic and its boundary |
26-31, 315-321 | ||
| GRI 103: Management Approach 2016 |
103-2 The management ap - proach and its components |
262-264 | |
| 103-3 Evaluation of the manage - ment approach |
262-264 | ||
| GRI 206: Anti-competi - tive Behavior 2016 |
206-1 Legal actions for an - ti-competitive behavior, an - ti-trust, and monopoly practices |
37 legal actions have been recorded in 2020 (16 in Italy, 6 in Iberia and 14 in Romania, 1 in Peru) |
|
| Tax | |||
| 103-1 Explanation of the material topic and its boundary |
26-31, 315-321 | ||
| GRI 103: Management Approach 2016 |
103-2 The management ap - proach and its components |
264-270 | |
| 103-3 Evaluation of the manage - ment approach |
264-270 | ||
| 207-1 Approach to tax | 264-270 | ||
| 207-2 Tax governance, control, and risk management |
264-270 | ||
| GRI 207: Tax 2019 | 207-3 Stakeholder engagement | 264-270 | |
| and management of concerns related to tax |
| E-MARKET SDIR |
|---|
| CERTIFIED |
| ement sec. chain |
|---|
| ement sec. ह ation on g the Code events are |
| ve been 16 in Italy, 6 in mania, 1 in |
| 300 series (Environmental topics) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Materials | ||||
| GRI 103: Management Approach 2016 |
103-1 Explanation of the material topic and its boundary |
26-31, 315-321 | ||
| 103-2 The management ap - proach and its components |
208-211 | |||
| 103-3 Evaluation of the manage - ment approach |
208-211 | |||
| GRI 301: Materials 2016 | 301-1 Materials used by weight or volume |
Sustainability Statement sec. Net Zero Ambition |
||
| 301-2 Recycled input materials used |
Sustainability Statement sec. Net Zero Ambition |
|||
| Energy | ||||
| GRI 103: Management Approach 2016 |
103-1 Explanation of the material topic and its boundary |
26-31, 315-321 | ||
| 103-2 The management ap - proach and its components |
208-211, 215-216 | |||
| 103-3 Evaluation of the manage - ment approach |
208-211, 215-216 | |||
| 302-1 Energy consumption with - in the organization |
215-216 | |||
| GRI 302: Energy 2016 | 302-3 Energy intensity | 215-216 | ||
| 302-4 Reduction of energy con - sumption |
215-216 | |||
| Water | ||||
| 103-1 Explanation of the material topic and its boundary |
26-31, 315-321 | |||
| GRI 103: Management Approach 2016 |
103-2 The management ap - proach and its components |
208-211, 216-220 | ||
| 103-3 Evaluation of the manage - ment approach |
208-211, 216-220 | |||
| 303-1 Interactions with water as a shared resource |
216-220 | |||
| 303-2 Management of water discharge-related impacts |
216-220 | |||
| GRI 303: Water and Ef - fluents 2018 |
303-3 Water withdrawal | 10-11, 83, 216-220 Sustainability Statement sec. Net Zero Ambition |
||
| 303-4 Water discharge | 216-220 Sustainability Statement sec. Net Zero Ambition |
|||
| 303-5 Water consumption | 10-11, Sustainability Statement sec. Net Zero Ambition |
|||
| Biodiversity | ||||
| 103-1 Explanation of the material topic and its boundary |
26-31, 315-321 | |||
| GRI 103: Management Approach 2016 |
103-2 The management ap - proach and its components |
208-211, 224-229 |
| 304-1 Operational sites owned, leased, managed in, or adjacent to, protected areas and areas of high biodiversity value outside protected areas |
224-229 | |
|---|---|---|
| GRI 304: Biodiversity 2016 |
304-2 Significant impacts of activities, products, and services on biodiversity |
224-229 |
| 304-3 Habitats protected or restored |
224-229 | |
| 304-4 IUCN Red List species and national conservation list species with habitats in areas affected by operations |
224-229 | |
| Emissions | ||
| 103-1 Explanation of the material topic and its boundary |
26-31, 315-321 | |
| GRI 103: Management Approach 2016 |
103-2 The management ap - proach and its components |
75-79, 208-211 |
| 103-3 Evaluation of the manage - ment approach |
75-79, 208-211 | |
| 305-1 Direct (Scope 1) GHG emissions |
10-11, 75-79, 213, Sustainability statement sec. Net Zero Am - bition |
|
| 305-2 Energy indirect (Scope 2) GHG emissions |
75-79, Sustainability statement sec. Net Zero Ambition |
|
| 305-3 Other indirect (Scope 3) GHG emissions |
75-79, Sustainability statement sec. Net Zero Ambition |
|
| GRI 305: Emissions 2016 | 305-4 GHG emissions intensity | 75-79, 213, Sustainability state - ment sec. Net Zero Ambition |
| 305-5 Reduction of GHG emis - sions |
75-79, Sustainability statement sec. Net Zero Ambition |
|
| 305-6 Emissions of ozone-de - pleting substances (ODS) |
75-79, Sustainability Statement sec. Net Zero Ambition |
|
| 305-7 Nitrogen oxides (NOX), sulfur oxides (SOX), and other significant air emissions |
213-214 Sustainability Statement sec. Net Zero Ambition |
|
| Effluents and Waste | ||
| 103-1 Explanation of the material topic and its Boundary |
26-31, 315-321 | |
| GRI 103: Management Approach 2016 |
103-2 The management ap - proach and its components |
208-211, 221-222 |
| 103-3 Evaluation of the manage - ment approach |
208-211, 221-222 | |
| 306-1 Waste generation and significant waste-related im - pacts |
221-222, Sustainability State - ment sec. Net Zero Ambition |
|
| 306-2 Management of signifi - cant waste-related impacts |
221-222 Sustainability Statement sec. Net Zero Ambition |
|
| GRI 306: Waste 2020 | 306-3 Waste generated | 221-222 Sustainability Statement sec. Net Zero Ambition |
| 306-4 Waste diverted from disposal |
221-222 Sustainability Statement sec. Net Zero Ambition |
|
| 306-5 Waste directed to dis - posal |
221-222 Sustainability Statement sec. Net Zero Ambition |
|

| - |
|---|
| - |
| - |
| Environmental Compliance | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 103-1 Explanation of the material topic and its Boundary |
26-31, 315-321 | |||
| GRI 103: Management Approach 2016 |
103-2 The management ap - proach and its components |
208-211, 232 | ||
| 103-3 Evaluation of the manage - ment approach |
208-211, 232 | |||
| GRI 307: Environmental Compliance 2016 |
307-1 Non-compliance with en - vironmental laws and regulations |
232, Sustainability Statement sec. Net Zero Ambition |
||
| Supplier Environmental Assessment | ||||
| GRI 103: Management Approach 2016 |
103-1 Explanation of the material topic and its Boundary |
26-31, 315-321 | ||
| 103-2 The management ap - proach and its components |
184-193 | |||
| 103-3 Evaluation of the manage - ment approach |
184-193 | |||
| GRI 308: Supplier Envi - ronmental Assessment 2016 |
308-1 New suppliers that were screened using environmental criteria |
187-188 | ||
| 400 series (Social topics) | ||||
| Employment | ||||
| 103-1 Explanation of the material topic and its Boundary |
26-31, 315-321 | |||
| GRI 103: Management Approach 2016 |
103-2 The management ap - proach and its components |
106-108 | ||
| 103-3 Evaluation of the manage - ment approach |
106-108 | |||
| 401-1 New employee hires and employee turnover |
10-11, 106-108; Sustainability Statement sec. Our people |
|||
| GRI 401: Employment 2016 |
401-2 Benefits provided to full time employees that are not provided to temporary or part time employees |
117-118 | ||
| Labor/Management Relations | ||||
| 103-1 Explanation of the material topic and its Boundary |
26-31, 315-321 | |||
| GRI 103: Management Approach 2016 |
103-2 The management ap - proach and its components |
106-108, 120-121 | ||
| 103-3 Evaluation of the manage - ment approach |
106-108, 120-121 | |||
| GRI 402: Labor/Manage - ment Relations 2016 |
402-1 Minimum notice periods regarding operational changes |
120-121 | ||
| Occupational Health and Safety | ||||
| 103-1 Explanation of the material topic and its boundary |
26-31, 315-321 | |||
| GRI 103: Management Approach 2016 |
103-2 The management ap - proach and its components |
196-205 | ||
| 103-3 Evaluation of the manage - ment approach |
196-205 |
| GRI 403: Occupational Health and Safety 2018 |
403-1 Occupational health and safety management system |
196-205 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 403-2 Hazard identification, risk assessment, and incident inves - tigation |
196-205 | ||||
| 403-3 Occupational health services |
196-205 | ||||
| 403-4 Worker participation, consultation, and communica - tion on occupational health and safety |
196-205 | ||||
| 403-5 Worker training on occu - pational health and safety |
196-205 | ||||
| 403-6 Promotion of worker health |
196-205 | ||||
| 403-7 Prevention and mitiga - tion of occupational health and safety impacts directly linked by business relationships |
196-205 | ||||
| 403-9 Work-related injuries | 198-200; Sustainability State - ment sec. Occupational health and safety |
||||
| Training and Education | |||||
| 103-1 Explanation of the material topic and its Boundary |
26-31, 315-321 | ||||
| GRI 103: Management Approach 2016 |
103-2 The management ap - proach and its components |
106-108, 109-111 | |||
| 103-3 Evaluation of the manage - ment approach |
106-108, 109-111 | ||||
| 404-1 Average hours of training per year per employee |
109-111 Sustainability Statement sec. Our people |
||||
| GRI 404: Training and Education 2016 |
404-2 Programs for upgrading employee skills and transition assistance programs |
109-111 | |||
| 404-3 Percentage of employees receiving regular performance and career development reviews |
109-111 Sustainability Statement sec. Our people |
||||
| Diversity and Equal Opportunity | |||||
| 103-1 Explanation of the material topic and its boundary |
26-31, 315-321 | ||||
| GRI 103: Management Approach 2016 |
103-2 The management ap - proach and its components |
106-108, 113-117, 238-241 | |||
| 103-3 Evaluation of the manage - ment approach |
106-108, 113-117, 238-241 | ||||
| GRI 405: Diversity and | 405-1 Diversity of governance bodies and employees |
tainability Statement, sec. Our people, Sound governance |
|||
| Equal Opportunity 2016 | 405-2 Ratio of basic salary and remuneration of women to men |
113-117 Sustainability Statement sec. Our people |
|||
| Non-discrimination | |||||
| 103-1 Explanation of the material topic and its boundary |
26-31, 315-321 | ||||
| GRI 103: Management Approach 2016 |
103-2 The management ap - proach and its components |
106-108, 113-117, 238-241, Sus 252-253, 255-261 |

| - | |
|---|---|
| - | |
| GRI 406: Non-discrimi - nation 2016 |
406-1 Incidents of discrimina - tion and corrective actions taken |
252-253, 255-261; Sustainability Statement, sec. Sound gover - nance |
|---|---|---|
| Freedom of Association and Collective Bargaining | ||
| 103-1 Explanation of the material topic and its Boundary |
26-31, 315-321 | |
| GRI 103: Management Approach 2016 |
103-2 The management ap - proach and its components |
184-193, 255-261 |
| 103-3 Evaluation of the manage - ment approach |
184-193, 255-261 | |
| GRI 407: Freedom of As - sociation and Collective Bargaining 2016 |
407-1 Operations and suppliers in which the right to freedom of association and collective bar - gaining may be at risk |
184-193, 255-261 |
| Child Labor | ||
| 103-1 Explanation of the material topic and its boundary |
26-31, 315-321 | |
| GRI 103: Management Approach 2016 |
103-2 The management ap - proach and its components |
184-193, 255-261 |
| 103-3 Evaluation of the manage - ment approach |
184-193, 255-261 | |
| GRI 408: Child Labor 2016 |
408-1 Operations and suppliers at significant risk for incidents of child labor |
184-193, 255-261 |
| Forced or Compulsory Labor | ||
| 103-1 Explanation of the material topic and its boundary |
26-31, 315-321 | |
| GRI 103: Management Approach 2016 |
103-2 The management ap - proach and its components |
184-193, 255-261 |
| 103-3 Evaluation of the manage - ment approach |
184-193, 255-261 | |
| GRI 409: Forced or Compulsory Labor 2016 |
409-1 Operations and suppliers at significant risk for incidents of forced or compulsory labor |
184-193, 255-261 |
| Security Practices | ||
| 103-1 Explanation of the material topic and its boundary |
26-31, 315-321 | |
| GRI 103: Management Approach 2016 |
103-2 The management ap - proach and its components |
255-261 |
| 103-3 Evaluation of the manage - ment approach |
255-261 | |
| GRI 410: Security Prac - tices 2016 |
410-1 Security personnel trained in human rights policies or pro - cedures |
260 All Enel people are involved in training about sustainability issues, of which human rights are a fundamental element. All suppliers sign specific clauses concerning human rights and commit to complying with the associated policy |
| Rights of Indigenous Peoples | ||
| 103-1 Explanation of the material topic and its boundary |
26-31, 315-321 | |
| GRI 103: Management Approach 2016 |
103-2 The management ap - proach and its components |
124-128, 255-261 |
| 103-3 Evaluation of the manage - ment approach |
124-128, 255-261 |
| GRI 411: Rights of Indig - enous Peoples 2016 |
411-1 Incidents of violations involving rights of indigenous peoples |
No violations of the rights of indigenous peoples have been reported |
|||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Human Rights Assessment | |||||
| 103-1 Explanation of the material topic and its Boundary |
26-31, 315-321 | ||||
| GRI 103: Management Approach 2016 |
103-2 The management ap - proach and its components |
252-253, 255-261 | |||
| 103-3 Evaluation of the manage - ment approach |
252-253, 255-261 | ||||
| 412-1 Operations that have been subject to human rights reviews or impact assessments |
252-253, 255-261 | ||||
| GRI 412: Human Rights Assessment 2016 |
412-2 Employee training on human rights policies or pro - cedures |
255, Sustainability Statement, sec. Our people Sound governance par. Human rights |
|||
| 412-3 Significant investment agreements and contracts that include human rights clauses or that underwent human rights screening |
Sustainability Statement, sec. Sound governance |
||||
| Local Communities | |||||
| 103-1 Explanation of the material topic and its Boundary |
26-31, 315-321 | ||||
| GRI 103: Management Approach 2016 |
103-2 The management ap - proach and its components |
124-128, 255-261 | |||
| 103-3 Evaluation of the manage - ment approach |
124-128, 255-261 | ||||
| GRI 413: Local Commu - nities 2016 |
413-1 Operations with local community engagement, impact assessments, and development programs |
100% of thermal power plants in O&M, 96% of renewable plants in O&M |
|||
| 413-2 Operations with sig - nificant actual and potential negative impacts on local com - munities |
124-128 | ||||
| Supplier Social Assessment | |||||
| 103-1 Explanation of the material topic and its Boundary |
26-31, 315-321 | ||||
| GRI 103: Management Approach 2016 |
103-2 The management ap - proach and its components |
184-193, 255-261 | |||
| 103-3 Evaluation of the manage - ment approach |
184-193, 255-261 | ||||
| GRI 414: Supplier Social Assessment 2016 |
414-1 New suppliers that were screened using social criteria |
184-193 | |||
| Public Policy | |||||
| 103-1 Explanation of the material topic and its Boundary |
26-31, 315-321 | ||||
| GRI 103: Management Approach 2016 |
103-2 The management ap - proach and its components |
262-264 | |||
| 103-3 Evaluation of the manage - ment approach |
262-264 |

| Mapping process | ||
|---|---|---|
| Information | review in 2021 | |
| Percentage | not available | to include assessment |
| of total Group | on all | of Global |
| operations | business | Infrastructure & |
| areas | Networks asset | |
| and value chain | ||
| GRI 415: Public Policy 2016 |
415-1 Political contributions | Enel does not have direct relations with political parties and does not provide financing of any kind, as explicitly established at point 2.2 of the Zero Tolerance of Corruption Plan and at point 3.26 of the Group's Code of Ethics. Some exceptions can be found in some countries following the local law and subject to analysis by the due bodies |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Customer Health and Safety | |||
| 103-1 Explanation of the material topic and its Boundary |
26-31, 315-321 | ||
| GRI 103: Management Approach 2016 |
103-2 The management ap - proach and its components |
196-198, 203 | |
| 103-3 Evaluation of the manage - ment approach |
196-198, 203 | ||
| GRI 416: Customer Health and Safety 2016 |
416-1 Assessment of the health and safety impacts of product and service categories |
203; New products and services are assessed in terms of potential impact on health and safety throughout the value chain, in order to minimize that impact, as confirmed by point 2.2.1 of the Human Rights Policy |
|
| Marketing and Labeling | |||
| GRI 103: Management Approach 2016 |
103-1 Explanation of the material topic and its Boundary |
26-31, 315-321 | |
| 103-2 The management ap - proach and its components |
95-96, 98-100 | ||
| 103-3 Evaluation of the manage - ment approach |
95-96, 98-100 | ||
| GRI 417: Marketing and Labeling 2016 |
417-1 Requirements for product and service information and labeling |
All the Group sale companies comply with the transparency obligations envisaged by various national and supranational reg - ulations regarding the source of the electricity sold. Energy bills must specify the mix of energy sources used and the source of the energy |
|
| 417-3 Incidents of non-com - pliance concerning marketing communications |
In 2020 there were no cases of non compliance with regulations or voluntary codes relating to the Enel Group marketing activities |
||
| Customer Privacy | |||
| 103-1 Explanation of the material topic and its boundary |
26-31, 315-321 | ||
| GRI 103: Management Approach 2016 |
103-2 The management ap - proach and its components |
260-261 | |
| 103-3 Evaluation of the manage - ment approach |
260-261 | ||
| GRI 418: Customer Pri - vacy 2016 |
418-1 Substantiated complaints concerning breaches of cus - tomer privacy and losses of customer data |
260-261 |
| General standard disclosures for the electric utility sector | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| General standard dis - closures for the electric utility sector |
e number(s)/URL/Direct answer | ||
| EU1 | 10-11, 81-82 Sustainability Statement, sec. At a glance |
||
| EU2 | 10-11, 81-82 Sustainability Statement, sec. At a glance |
||
| EU3 | 10-11, 81, 90 Sustainability Statement, sec. Electification, digital and platforms, Innovazi - one |
||
| EU4 | 10-11, 90 Sustainability State - ment, sec. At a glance, Electi - fication, digital and platforms Innovazione |
||
| Specific standard disclosures for the electric utility sector | |||
| Category: economic | |||
| DMA | MATERIAL ASPECT: DEMAND SIDE MANAGEMENT 91-94, 101-103 MATERIAL ASPECT: RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT 146-147 MATERIAL ASPECT: SYSTEM EFFICIENCY |
||
| EU11 | 81, Sustainability Statement, sec. Electification, digital and platforms |
||
| EU12 | Sustainability Statement, sec. Electification, digital and plat - forms |
||
| Category: social | |||
| Sub-category: labor practices and decent work | |||
| Material aspect: employment | |||
| DMA | 109-111 | ||
| DMA | 196-198 | ||
| EU15 | Sustainability Statement, sec. Our people |
||
| EU18 | 10-11; Sustainability Statement, sec. Sustainable supply chain |
||
| Sub-category: society | |||
| Material aspect: local communities | |||
| DMA | 134-141 | ||
| EU22 | 134-141 | ||
| Material aspect: disaster/emergency planning and response | |||
| DMA | 204 |

| Sub-category: product responsibility | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Material aspect: customer health and safety | |||||
| EU25 | 203 Sustainability Statement, sec. Local and global communities |
||||
| Material aspect: access | |||||
| DMA | 96-100 | ||||
| EU26 | Italy: 0% Spain: 0% Argentina: 0% Brazil: 0.7% Chile: 0% Colombia: 0.2% Peru: 4.8% |
||||
| EU27 | Sustainability Statement, sec. Electification, digital and plat forms |
||||
| EU28 | Sustainability Statement, sec. Electification, digital and plat forms |
||||
| EU29 | 10-11, Sustainability Statement, sec. Electification, digital and platforms |
||||
| EU30 | 81, Sustainability Statement, Electification, digital and plat forms |
||||
| Material aspect: provision of information | |||||
| DMA | 100-101 | ||||
| Omission | |||||
| GRI Standard | Disclosure | Page number(s) and/or URL(s) | Part Omitted | Reason | Explanation |
| Material Topics | |||||
| GRI 101: Foundation 2016 | |||||
| Other indicator (1) | 1. Number of incidents of non-compliance with phys ical and/or 2) cybersec.urity standards or regulations 2. cybersec.urity standards or regulations |
1. 15 2. 0 |
|||
| Total wholesale electricity purchased |
47,506,376.44 (MWh) The value considers the whole sale electricity purchased by the Global Trading Business Line |
(1) Additional indicators according to GRI 101.
| Reference | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Topic | Code | Accounting Metric | Sustainability Report |
Omission | GRI reference |
||
| (1) Gross global Scope 1 emissions |
45.3 mil tCO2eq | ||||||
| IF-EU 110a.1 |
(2) percentage covered under Emissions-limiting regulations |
53% | Net-zero ambition Sustainability |
- | 305-1 | ||
| (3) percentage covered under Emissions-reporting regulations |
100% | statement | |||||
| Greenhouse Gas Emissions & Energy Resource Planning |
IF-EU 110a.2 |
Greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions associated with power deliveries |
Net-zero ambition 44.8 mil tCO2eq Sustainability statement |
- | 305-1 | ||
| IF-EU 110a.3 |
Discussion of long-term and short-term strategy or plan to manage Scope 1 emissions, emissions reduction targets, and an analysis of performance against those targets |
Net-zero ambition - | 102-15 201-2 |
||||
| (1) Number of customers served in markets subject to renewable portfolio standards IF-EU (RPS) 110a.4 |
NA | US regulation | - | ||||
| (2) percentage fulfillment of RPS target by market |

The following table shows the main indicators required by the SASB (Sustainability Accounting Standards Board) standard in relation to the primary sector of reference for Enel: "Electric Utilities & Power Generators Sector". There are 27 indicators (Sustainability Disclosure Topics & Accounting Metrics and Activity Metrics) divided into 6 main themes: Environment, Energy Affordability, Safety, End-Use Efficiency & Demand, Grid Resiliency, Activity Metric. The table shows, where present, the reference to the GRI indicator with which the disclosure required by the SASB was covered, as well as references to the chapters of the 2020 Sustainability Report.
| Air Quality | IF-EU 120a.1 |
Air emissions of the following pollutants: (1) NOx (excluding N O), 2 (2) SO |
76,256 (t) 20,547 (t) |
IF-EU 240a.1 |
Average retail electric rate for (1) residential, (2) commercial, and (3) industrial customers |
N/A | Eletrification, digital and platform Sustainability statement |
Billing data not available on the date of publication of the report |
G4-DMA EU26 EU27 EU28 EU29 EU30 |
||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 (3) particulate matter (PM10) |
1,243 (t) (from thermal production) |
Environmental Sustainability |
- | 305-7 | Eletrification, digital and N/A platform Sustainability statement |
Consumption rates not representative for European and Italian customer retail market |
G4-DMA EU26 EU27 EU28 EU29 EU31 |
||||||
| (4) lead (Pb) (5) mercury (Hg) |
N/A 0.05 (t) (from coal power plants) |
Sustainability statement |
IF-EU 240a.2 |
Typical monthly electric bill for residential customers for (1) 500 kWh and (2) 1,000 kWh of electricity delivered per month |
|||||||||
| (6) percentage of each in or near areas of dense population |
N/A | Energy Affordability | 1) Number of residential customer electric |
Eletrification, digital and platform Sustainability Statement - |
EU27 | ||||||||
| (1) Total water withdrawn | 51.5 (Mm³) | 303-3 a | IF-EU 240a.3 |
disconnections for non payment |
|||||||||
| Water Management | IF-EU 140a.1 IF-EU 140a.2 |
(2) total water consumed | 20.4 (Mm³) | Environmental Sustainability |
303-5 a | IF-EU | 2) percentage reconnected within 30 days |
N/A | |||||
| 3) percentage of each in regions with High or Extremely High Baseline Water Stress |
22.9% of water withdrawal in water stressed areas 31.6% of water consumption in in water stressed areas |
Sustainability statement |
- | - | Discussion of impact of external factors on customer affordability of electricity, |
DMA EU (former EU7) DMA EU (former |
|||||||
| Number of incidents of non-compliance associated with water quantity and/or quality permits, standards, and |
N/A: Available from 2021 reporting cycle |
240a.4 | including the economic conditions of the service territory |
Eletrification, digital and platform | - | EU23) 102-43 102-44 103-2 103-3 |
|||||||
| regulations | (1) Total recordable incident rate (TRIR), |
(1) 0.599 (i) | Occupational | ||||||||||
| IF-EU 320a.1 |
(2) fatality rate | (2) 0.008 (i) | health and safety Sustainability statement |
- | 403-9 | ||||||||
| IF-EU 140a.3 |
Description of water management risks and discussion of strategies and practices to mitigate those risks |
Environmental Sustainability |
- | 303-1 303-2 102-15 |
(3) near miss frequency rate (NMFR) |
(3) 0.297 (i) | |||||||
| Coal Ash Management | IF-EU 150a.1 |
1) Amount of coal combustion residuals (CCR) generated |
0.802 (mil t) Environmental Sustainability Sustainability statement |
- | 306-3 | F-EU 420a.1 |
Percentage of electric utility revenues from rate structures that (1) are decoupled and (2) contain a lost revenue adjustment mechanism (LRAM) |
N/A | LRAM regulation applicable in US |
||||
| 2) percentage recycled | 72% | 306-4 | |||||||||||
| IF-EU 150a.2 |
Total number of coal combustion residual (CCR) impoundments, broken down by hazard potential classification and structural |
N/A | US regulations | End-Use Efficiency & Demand | F-EU 420a.2 |
Percentage of electric load served by smart grid technology |
N/A: Available from 2021 reporting cycle |
||||||
| integrity assessment | F-EU 420a.3 |
Customer electricity savings from efficiency measures, by market (megawatt hours) |
N/A: Available from 2021 reporting cycle |

| Nuclear Safety & Emergency Management |
IF-EU 540a.1 |
Total number of nuclear power units, broken down by U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) Action Matrix Column |
N/A | US regulation | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IF-EU 540a.2 |
Description of efforts to manage nuclear safety and emergency preparedness |
Occupational Health and Safety |
- | DMA EU former EU21 |
|
| F-EU 550a.1 |
1) Number of incidents of non compliance with physical and/ or 2) cybersecurity standards or regulations |
15 Digital supports and cyber security |
- | - | |
| 2) cybersecurity standards or regulations |
0 | - | |||
| Grid Resiliency | (1) System Average Interruption Duration Index (SAIDI), |
Eletrification, digital and platforms Sustainability Statement |
- | EU29 | |
| IF-EU 550a.2 |
(2) System Average Interruption Frequency Index (SAIFI) |
- | EU28 | ||
| (3) Customer Average Interruption Duration Index (CAIDI), inclusive of major event days |
N/A |
| CODE | Activity metric | Reference Omission Sustainability Report |
GRI reference |
||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IF-EU 000.A |
Number of: (1) residential, (2) commercial, and (3) industrial customers served |
N/A | Segmentation of customers not applicable to the Enel customer base |
- | |
| IF-EU 000.B |
Total electricity delivered to: (1) residential, (2) commercial, (3) industrial, (4) all other retail customers, (5) wholesale customers |
N/A | Eletrification, digital and platforms Sustainability statement |
Segmentation of customers not applicable to the Enel customer base |
- |
| IF-EU 000.C |
Length of transmission and distribution lines |
2,231,961 (km) | - | EU4 | |
| 1) Total electricity generated, markets |
Eletrification, digital and platforms |
- | EU2 | ||
| IF-EU | 2) percentage by major energy | Sustainability Statement |
| CODE | Activity metric | Reference Omission | GRI reference |
|||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sustainability Report |
||||||
| IF-EU 000.A |
Number of: (1) residential, (2) commercial, and (3) industrial customers served |
N/A | Segmentation of customers not applicable to the Enel customer base |
- | ||
| IF-EU 000.B |
Total electricity delivered to: (1) residential, (2) commercial, (3) industrial, (4) all other retail customers, (5) wholesale customers |
N/A | Eletrification, digital and platforms Sustainability statement |
Segmentation of customers not applicable to the Enel customer base |
- | |
| IF-EU 000.C |
Length of transmission and distribution lines |
2,231,961 (km) | - | EU4 | ||
| 1) Total electricity generated, markets |
- Eletrification, digital and platforms |
EU2 | ||||
| IF-EU 000.D |
2) percentage by major energy source, |
Sustainability Statement |
- | |||
| 3) percentage in regulated markets |
N/A | |||||
| IF-EU 000.E |
Total wholesale electricity purchased |
47,506,376.44 (MWh)** | - | - | ||
N/A: Not applicable
N/A: Not available
* Based on the classification provided by the WRI "Aqueduct Water Risk Atlas", the water stressed areas are those where the ratio between the total annual withdrawal of surface water or groundwater for different uses (civil, industrial, agricultural and livestock) and the total annual renewable water supply available ("base water stress", understood, therefore, as the level of competition between all users) is high (40-80%) or extremely high (>80%). By way of greater environmental protection, we have also considered as located in water stressed areas those plants falling in zones classified by the WRI as "arid".
** Value considers wholesale electricity purchased by the Global Trading Business Line
| NET-ZERO AMBITION (LINK: Sustainability Report) |
RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE TCFD (TASK FORCE ON CLIMATE-RELATED FINANCIAL DISCLOSURES) |
EUROPEAN COMMISSION GUIDELINES ON CLIMATE RELATED INFORMATION |
|---|---|---|
| › Net Zero Ambition › A just and inclusive transition › Involvement of the stakeholders in the fight against climate change › Enel's advocacy activities for the climate |
Policies and Due Diligence Process | |
| › The Enel governance model to face climate Competences of corporate bodies in relation to climate change The Enel organizational model for management of climate related issues Incentives system concerning climate change |
Governance: recommended disclosure a) and b) | Policies and Due Diligence Process |
| › Enel's impact on climate change |
Business Model | |
| › Climatic scenarios The physical climate scenario The transition scenario |
Strategy: recommended disclosure c) | Business Model |
| › The strategy for facing climate change 2030 vision 2021-2023 Strategic Plan |
Strategy: recommended disclosure b), c) | Business Model |
| › Main risks and opportunities connected with climate change Identification, assessment and management of risks and opportunities related to physical phenomena Identification, assessment and management of risks and opportunities related to transition phenomena |
Strategy: recommended disclosure a) Risk Management recommended disclosure a), b), c) |
Principal Risks and their management |
| › Enel's performance in the fight against climate change Enel's carbon footprint The roadmap and the targets for the reduction of greenhouse gas emissions Le metriche finanziarie, operative e ambientali Goals |
Metrics & Targets: Recommended disclosure a), b), c) |
Outcomes; Key Performance Indicators |
Reflecting the Group's commitment to climate change related disclosures, the following table shows the alignment of Enel's disclosure both with respect to "Guidelines on reporting climate-related information" published by the European Commission in June 2019, taking into consideration the results of the first work performed by the European Lab Project Task Force on Climate-related Reporting (PTF-CRR), which collects the associated best practices ("How to improve climate-related reporting"), and with respect to the Task force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures (TCFD) of the Financial Stability Board, which published specific recommendations for the voluntary reporting of the financial impact of climate risks in June 2017.
The International Business Council (IBC) of the World Economic Forum published, in 2020, a report, called 'Measuring Stakeholder Capitalism: Towards Common Metrics and Consistent Reporting of Sustainable Value Creation' (1), with the aim of defining shared common metrics to measure, report and compare the levels of sustainability, in other words the effectiveness of its actions in pursuing the sustainable development goals indicated by the UN (SDG), in the business model adopted to create value for stakeholders. The metrics are based on existing standards and aim to increase convergence and comparability between the various parameters used in sustainability reports. The following table provides information on the 21 primary indicators ("core") indicated in the report and references to the chapters of the 2020 Sustainability Report.
(1) https://www.weforum.org/reports/measuring-stakeholder-capitalism-towards-common-metrics-and-consistent-reporting-of-sustainable-value-creation.


| Sustanability Report 2020 | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pillar | Theme | Core metrics | Key performance indicators | 2020 Reference | |
| Principles of Governance |
Governing Purpose |
Setting purpose | - | - At a glance - Open Power | |
| Quality of Governing Body |
Governance body composition |
Women on Board of Directors no. | 4 | Sound governance - Corporate governance model Sustainability Statement |
|
| Stakeholder Engagement |
Material issues impacting stakeholders |
- | - At a glance - Our priorities | ||
| Ethical behavior | Anti-corruption | Employees who received training about anti-corruption policies and procedures%) |
40 | Sound governance - Values and pillars of corporate ethics Sustainability Statement |
|
| Ascertained violations related to conflict of interest/corruption no. |
2 | ||||
| Protected ethics advice and reporting mechanisms |
Reports received related to violations of the Code of Ethics |
151 | |||
| Risk and Opportunity Oversight |
Integrating risk and opportunity into business process |
- | - Sound governance - ESG risks | ||
| Planet | Climate Change | Greenhouse Gas (GHG) emissions |
Direct greenhouse gas emissions- Scope 1 (mil teq) |
45.3 | Net-zero ambition Sustainability Statement |
| Indirect greenhouse gas emissions Scope 2 - Purchased electricity from the grid (location based) (mil teq) |
1.4 | ||||
| Indirect greenhouse gas emissions - Scope 2 - Purchased electricity from the grid (market based) (mil teq) |
2.3 | ||||
| Indirect greenhouse gas emissions - Scope 2 - Distribution and trasmission system: energy losses (location based) (mil teq ) |
3.6 | ||||
| Indirect greenhouse gas emissions - Scope 3 (mil teq) |
47.7 | ||||
| TCFD implementation | - | - | |||
| Nature Loss | Land use and ecological sensitivity |
Hectares of protected areas (.000 ha) | 1.3 Environmental sustainability - Biodiversity |
| Pillar | Theme | Core metrics | Key performance indicators | 2020 Reference | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Planet | Fresh Water Availability |
Water consumption and withdrawal in water stressed areas |
Water withdrawal (m 3 ) |
51.5 | Environmental sustainability Sustainability Statement |
| Water withdrawal in "water stressed" areas (%) |
22.9 | ||||
| Water consumption (m ) 3 |
20.4 | ||||
| Water consumption in "water stressed" areas (%) |
31.6 | ||||
| People | Dignity and Equality |
Diversity and inclusion | Women incidence on total employees (%) | 21.5 | Our people |
| Pay equality | Equal Remuration Ratio (%) | 83.3 | Sustainability Statement | ||
| Wage level | CEO ratio | 146x Sound governance | |||
| Risk for incidents of child, forces or compulsory labor |
Evaluation among the supply chain of child labour defense and of compulsory or forced work prohibition |
- Sound governance - Human rights Sustainable supply chain |
|||
| Health and Wellbeing |
Health and safety | Fatal accidents-Enel no. | 1 | Occupational health and safety Sustainability Statement |
|
| Fatalities frequency rate-Enel (i) | 0.008 | ||||
| "High consequence" injuries-Enel no. | 3 | ||||
| "High consequence" injuries frequency rate- Enel (i) |
0.024 | ||||
| Skills for the Future |
Training provided | Average hours of training per employee (h/per cap) |
40.9 | Our people Sustainability Statement |
|
| Employees training cost (min euros) | 18 | ||||
| Prosperity | Employment and Wealth Generation |
Absolute number and rate of employment |
People hired no. | 3,131 | |
| Hiring rate (%) | 4.7 | Our people | |||
| Terminations no. | 3,696 | Sustainability Statement | |||
| Turnover (%) | 5.6 | ||||
| Economic contribution | - | - Sustainability Statement | |||
| Financial investment contribution |
Total investments (min euros) | 10,197 Sustainability Statement | |||
| Purchase of own shares and dividends paid |
4,755 Consolidated Annual Report | ||||
| Innovation in Better Products and Services |
Total R&D expenses | Investments in research and development (min euros) |
111 Innovation Sustainability Statement |
||
| Community and Social Vitality |
Total tax paid | Total tax paid (min euros) (1) | 4,245 Trend Topic - Tax transparency |

Concept design and realization HNTO
Copy editing postScriptum di Paola Urbani
Publication not for sale
By Enel Communications
Enel Societ. per azioni Sede legale 00198 Roma Viale Regina Margherita, 137 Capitale sociale Euro 10.166.679.946 i.v. Registro Imprese di Roma, Codice Fiscale 00811720580 R.E.A. 756032 Partita IVA 15844561009
© Enel SpA 00198 Roma, Viale Regina Margherita, 137

<-- PDF CHUNK SEPARATOR -->



334
Building tools?
Free accounts include 100 API calls/year for testing.
Have a question? We'll get back to you promptly.