Annual Report • Feb 29, 2008
Annual Report
Open in ViewerOpens in native device viewer
The Annual General Meeting (AGM) of Fortum Corporation will be held on Tuesday, 1 April 2008, at 1.00 p.m., at Finlandia Hall, Mannerheimintie 13 e, Helsinki. Registration of shareholders who have notified the Company of their attendance will begin at 11.45 a.m.
A shareholder who wishes to attend the AGM must give a prior notice to Fortum. The notice to attend may be given through Fortum's internet
pages at www.fortum.com/agm, by telephone at +358 (0)10 452 9460, by fax at +358 (0)10 262 2727 or by mail to Fortum Corporation, Corporate Legal Affairs/AGM, POB 1, FI-00048 FORTUM, Finland. The notice and any power of attorney must arrive by 4.00 p.m. (Finnish time), 25 March 2008.
The Board of Directors proposes to the AGM that a dividend of EUR 1.35 per share be paid for the financial period 2007. Of this total dividend, EUR 0.77 per share is to be paid from Fortum's recurring earnings. An additional dividend of EUR 0.58 per share is proposed in order to steer Fortum's capital structure towards the target. The record date for dividend payment is 4 April 2008, and the proposed dividend payment date is 11 April 2008.
The Annual Report and interim reports are available in Finnish, Swedish and English and can be read also on Fortum's website at www.fortum.com.
Fortum management serves analysts and the media with regular press conferences, which are webcasted to the company's internet pages. Management also gives interviews on a one-on-one and group basis. Fortum participates in various conferences for investors.
Fortum observes a silent period of 30 days prior to publishing its results. Additional information about shares and shareholders is presented in the Fortum Share and Shareholders section in Operating and Financial Review in Financials.
Listed on OMX Nordic Exchange Helsinki Trading ticker: FUM1V Number of shares, 30 January 2008: 886,935,660 Sector: Utilities
Mika Paloranta, Vice President, Investor Relations, tel. +358 (0)10 452 4138, fax +358 (0) 10 452 4176, e-mail: [email protected]
Rauno Tiihonen, Manager, Investor Relations, tel. +358 (0)10 453 6150, fax +358 (0) 10 452 4176, e-mail: [email protected]
Financial documents can be obtained from Fortum Corporation, Mail Room, POB 1, FI-00048 FORTUM, Finland, tel. +358 (0)10 452 9151, e-mail: [email protected]
Investor information is available online at www.fortum.com/investors
| Fortum in Brief | 2 |
|---|---|
| Operating and Financial Review | 6 |
| Financial Performance | 6 |
| Risk Management | 17 |
| The Fortum Share and Shareholders | 21 |
| Consolidated Financial Statements, IFRS | 24 |
| Consolidated Income Statement | 24 |
| Consolidated Balance Sheet | 25 |
| Consolidated Statement of Changes in Total Equity | 26 |
| Consolidated Cash Flow Statement | 27 |
| Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements | 28 |
|---|---|
| 1 Accounting Policies | 28 |
| 2 Critical Accounting estimates and judgments | 37 |
| 3 Financial Risk Management | 38 |
| 4 Capital Risk Management | 44 |
| 5 Primary segment information | 44 |
| 6 Geographical segments | 48 |
| 7 Fair Value Changes of Derivatives and | |
| Underlying items in Income Statement | 49 |
| 8 Acquisitions and Disposals | 50 |
| 9 Exchange Rates | 53 |
| 10 Sales | 53 |
| 11 Other Income | 53 |
| 12 Materials and Services | 54 |
| 13 Other Expenses | 54 |
| 14 Management Remuneration and Employee Costs | 54 |
| 15 Depreciation, Amortisation and Impairment Charges | 56 |
| 16 Finance Costs – Net | 56 |
| 17 Income Tax Expense | 57 |
| 18 Earnings Per Share | 58 |
| 19 Dividend Per Share | 59 |
| 20 Financial Assets and Liabilities by Categories | 59 |
| 21 Intangible Assets | 61 |
| 22 Property, Plant and Equipment | 62 |
| 23 Investments in Associated Companies and Joint Ventures | 64 |
|---|---|
| 24 Other Long-term Investments | 66 |
| 25 Long-term and Short-term Interest-bearing Receivables | 67 |
| 26 Inventories | 68 |
| 27 Trade and Other Receivables | 68 |
| 28 Cash and Cash Equivalents | 69 |
| 29 Share Capital | 69 |
| 30 Fair Value and Other Reserves | 70 |
| 31 Employee Bonus and Incentive Schemes | 70 |
| 32 Minority Interests | 74 |
| 33 Interest-bearing Liabilities | 75 |
| 34 Deferred Income Taxes | 76 |
| 35 Pension and Other Provisions | 77 |
| 36 Pensions Obligations | 78 |
| 37 Nuclear Related Assets and Liabilities | 81 |
| 38 Other Non-current Liabilities | 82 |
| 39 Trade Payables and Other Current Liabilities | 83 |
| 40 Pledged Assets | 83 |
| 41 Commitments | 84 |
| 42 Contingent Liabilities | 84 |
| 43 Legal Actions and Official Proceedings | 85 |
| 44 Related Party Transactions | 85 |
| 45 Events After the Balance Sheet Date | 85 |
| 46 Subsidiaries by Segment on 31 December 2007 | 86 |
| Key Figures | 88 |
|---|---|
| Financial Key Figures | 88 |
| Share Key Figures | 90 |
| Operational Key Figures, Volumes | 91 |
| Operational Key Figures, Segments | 92 |
| Definitions of Key Figures | 94 |
| Finnish GAAP (FAS) | 96 |
|---|---|
| Income Statement | 96 |
| Balance Sheet | 96 |
| Cash Flow Statement | 97 |
| Notes to the Financial Statements | 97 |
| Proposal for Distribution of Earnings | 102 |
| Auditors' Report | 103 |
| Statement by the Supervisory Board | 104 |
Fortum's Annual report 2007 consists of two separate volumes: the Review of Operations and the Financials. Sustainable development is reported in the Review of Operations.
Follow this icon beside text columns to find more information.
Fortum is a leading energy company in the Nordic countries and other parts of the Baltic Rim area. Activities cover the generation, distribution and sale of electricity and heat as well as the operation and maintenance of power plants. Fortum makes sure that sustainable energy services are available today and tomorrow.
Fortum's businesses are divided into four reporting segments. Power is generated in plants owned or partly owned by Fortum in the Power Generation segment and in combined heat and power plants in the Heat segment. Power Generation sells the electricity it generates through the Nordic power exchange Nord Pool. The Markets segment buys its electricity through Nord Pool and sells it to private and business customers as well as to other electricity retailers. The Heat segment sells steam and district heating mainly to industrial and municipal customers as well as to real estate companies. Fortum's distribution and regional network transmissions are reported in the Distribution segment. Power generation
REPORTING SEGMENTS BUSINESS UNITS Group Power Generation Heat Distribution Markets Generation Portfolio Management and Trading Service Heat Värme Distribution Markets Sales1) Power Generation Markets 27.0% Sales by market area Finland 33.2% Norway 10.9% Poland 3.0% Other European countries 4.7% Other 1.3%
Fortum is listed on OMX Nordic Exchange Helsinki. Fortum prepares annual financial statements in interim reports conforming to Finnish legislation. They are published in Finnish, Swedish and English. The International Financial
Fortum communicated in 2006 to have a prudent and efficient capital structure which at the same time allows the implementation of its strategy. The defined target capital structure is Net debt to EBITDA in the range of 3.0 to 3.5. Fortum also revised target on return on shareholders' equity in line with the company's targeted capital structure. The new target was increased from 12% to 14% or higher. The target for return on capital employed remained at 12% or higher.
Reporting Standards (IFRS) were adopted in 2005. At 31 December 2007 market capitalisation was EUR 27,319 million.
| Target | 2007 adjusted1) |
2007 | 2006 | 2005 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROCE, % | 12% | 14.0 | 16.5 | 13.4 | 13.5 |
| ROE, % | 14% | 15.8 | 19.1 | 14.4 | 13.5 |
| Capital structure: Net debt/EBITDA |
3.0–3.5x | 2.2 | 1.9 | 2.3 | 1.8 |
1) Adjusted for REC and Lenenergo gains.
| 2007 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EUR million or as indicated | adjusted1) | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 |
| Sales | 4,479 | 4,491 | 3,877 | |
| EBITDA | 2,298 | 1,884 | 1,754 | |
| Operating profit | 1,847 | 1,455 | 1,347 | |
| Comparable operating profit | 1,564 | 1,437 | 1,334 | |
| Profit for the period attributable to equity holders | 1,552 | 1,071 | 884 | |
| Capital employed | 13,544 | 12,663 | 11,357 | |
| Interest-bearing net debt | 4,466 | 4,345 | 3,158 | |
| Net debt/EBITDA | 2.2 | 1.9 | 2.3 | 1.8 |
| Return on capital employed, % | 14.0 | 16.5 | 13.4 | 13.5 |
| Return on shareholders' equity, % | 15.8 | 19.1 | 14.4 | 13.5 |
| Capital expenditure and gross investments in shares | 972 | 1,395 | 479 | |
| Net cash from operating activities | 1,670 | 1,151 | 1,271 | |
1) Adjusted for REC and Lenenergo gains.
| 2007 | 2006 | 2005 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings per share, total Fortum, EUR | 1.74 | 1.22 | 1.55 |
| Earnings per share, continuing operations, EUR | 1.74 | 1.22 | 1.01 |
| Earnings per share, discontinued operations, EUR | – | – | 0.54 |
| Dividend per share total Fortum, EUR | 1.35 1) | 1.26 | 1.12 3) |
| Dividend per share continuing operations, EUR | 0.77 1) | 0.73 | 0.58 |
| Dividend per share additional in 2006 and 2007/ discontinued operations in 2005, EUR | 0.58 1) | 0.53 | 0.54 |
| Payout ratio total Fortum, % | 77.6 1) 2) | 103.3 2) | 72.3 |
| Payout ratio continuing operations, % | 44.3 1) 2) | 59.8 2) | 57.4 4) |
| Payout ratio additional dividend in 2006 and 2007/ discontinued operations in 2005, % | 33.3 1) 2) | 43.4 2) | 100.0 4) |
1) Board of Directors' proposal for the Annual General Meeting in 1 April 2008.
2) Payout ratios for 2006 and 2007 are based on the total earnings per share.
3) In addition to cash dividend Fortum distributed approximately 85% of Neste Oil Corporation shares as dividend in 2005.
4) 2005 payout ratio for continuing and discontinued operations are calculated based on the respective earnings per share from continuing and discontinued operations.
10 years Financial and Share Key Figures and their definitions are presented in the Financial Statements, see pages 88–90, and 94–95.
Fortum's business operations are organised in seven business units. Financial target setting, follow up and allocation of resources in the group's performance management process is based on the business units' comparable operating profit including share of associated companies and return on comparable net assets. Fortum's business
units are grouped into business segments in the external reporting.
Operational key f igures are presented in the Financial Statements, see pages 91–93 and Note 5 Primary segment information.
| fund adjustment | Operating profit excluding non-recurring items, fair value changes of derivatives not getting hedge accounting and nuclear |
Comparable operating profit plus profit from associated companies divided by comparable net assets |
|||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Key figures by segment, continuing operations | |||||||||
| Sales | Comparable operating profit | Comparable RONA% | |||||||
| EUR million | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 |
| Power Generation | 2,350 | 2,439 | 2,058 | 1,093 | 985 | 854 | 17.7 | 16.9 | 14.5 |
| Heat | 1,356 | 1,268 | 1,063 | 290 | 253 | 253 | 9.2 | 9.2 | 11.0 |
| Distribution | 769 | 753 | 707 | 231 | 250 | 244 | 7.5 | 8.3 | 8.6 |
| Markets | 1,683 | 1,912 | 1,365 | –1 | –4 | 30 | –0.6 | –0.8 | 16.4 |
| Other | 81 | 78 | 91 | –49 | –47 | –47 | |||
| Eliminations | –1,760 | –1,959 | –1,407 | – | – | – | |||
| Total | 4,479 | 4,491 | 3,877 | 1,564 | 1,437 | 1,334 |
| EUR million | Q1/2007 | Q2/2007 | Q3/2007 | Q4/2007 | 2007 | Q1/2006 | Q2/2006 | Q3/2006 | Q4/2006 | 2006 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Generation | 641 | 522 | 502 | 685 | 2,350 | 643 | 560 | 569 | 667 | 2,439 |
| Heat | 479 | 252 | 186 | 439 | 1,356 | 480 | 229 | 178 | 381 | 1,268 |
| Distribution | 225 | 172 | 166 | 206 | 769 | 219 | 162 | 162 | 210 | 753 |
| Markets | 519 | 351 | 331 | 482 | 1,683 | 547 | 400 | 436 | 529 | 1,912 |
| Other | 19 | 22 | 19 | 21 | 81 | 20 | 20 | 19 | 19 | 78 |
| Eliminations | –543 | –360 | –344 | –513 | –1,760 | –566 | –423 | –418 | –552 | –1,959 |
| Total | 1,340 | 959 | 860 | 1,320 | 4,479 | 1,343 | 948 | 946 | 1,254 | 4,491 |
| EUR million | Q1/2007 | Q2/2007 | Q3/2007 | Q4/2007 | 2007 | Q1/2006 | Q2/2006 | Q3/2006 | Q4/2006 | 2006 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Generation | 328 | 218 | 184 | 363 | 1,093 | 293 | 208 | 195 | 289 | 985 |
| Heat | 137 | 36 | –3 | 120 | 290 | 126 | 35 | –3 | 95 | 253 |
| Distribution | 78 | 53 | 50 | 50 | 231 | 81 | 53 | 39 | 77 | 250 |
| Markets | –14 | 3 | 11 | –1 | –1 | 0 | 2 | 2 | –8 | –4 |
| Other | –17 | –12 | –4 | –16 | –49 | –14 | –12 | –8 | –13 | –47 |
| Total | 512 | 298 | 238 | 516 | 1,564 | 486 | 286 | 225 | 440 | 1,437 |
The first and last quarters of the year are usually the strongest quarters for the power and heat businesses.
Quarterly information is available on Fortum's website www.fortum.com/investors/financial information.
Fortum's share outperformed its European utility peers during 2007. Fortum's share price appreciated 43% during the year, while Dow Jones European Utility Index increased 18% and OMX Helsinki cap index increased 8%.
Fortum has continuously carried out structural and operational development according to its strategy. Since 2000 Fortum has made acquisitions totalling EUR 8 bn and divestments EUR 7 bn. Since 2000 the share price increased by approximately 800%.
Fortum (Neste Oil spin-off adjusted) OMX Helsinki Cap DJ European Utilities
In the Nordic countries, Fortum is currently number one or the second largest in its core business areas. While in Poland, the Baltic countries and Russia, the company actively investigates growth opportunities. Implementation of the Nordic 1,300 MW power and heat generation growth investment program continued and several
power supply agreements with large customers were made. Fortum continued to develop its end customer power offerings for increased customer value with special focus on AMM (Automated Meter Management). In addition, Fortum is investing in new CHP plants in Poland and Estonia.
Total ~1,300 MW
The year 2007 was characterised by high precipitation and mild winter temperatures. Throughout the year, a strong hydrological situation combined with low CO2 emission allowance prices led to low Nordic spot prices. Despite the challenging market conditions, Fortum improved its performance compared to previous year. The company's financial position remained strong. Net cash from operating activities improved to EUR 1,670 (1,151) million.
| EUR million or as indicated | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sales | 4,479 | 4,491 | 3,877 |
| Operating profit | 1,847 | 1,455 | 1,347 |
| Operating profit, % of sales | 41.2 | 32.4 | 34.7 |
| Comparable operating profit | 1,564 | 1,437 | 1,334 |
| Profit before taxes | 1,934 | 1,421 | 1,267 |
| Profit for the period attributable to equity holders |
1,552 | 1,071 | 884 |
| Earnings per share, EUR | 1.74 | 1.22 | 1.01 |
| Net cash from operating activities | 1,670 | 1,151 | 1,271 |
| Shareholders' equity per share, EUR |
9.43 | 8.91 | 8.17 |
| Capital employed | 13,544 | 12,663 | 11,357 |
| Interest-bearing net debt | 4,466 | 4,345 | 3,158 |
| Average number of shares, 1,000s | 889,997 | 881,194 | 872,613 |
| 2007 adjusted 2) |
2007 | 2006 | 2005 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return on capital employed, % |
14.0 | 16.5 | 13.4 | 13.5 |
| Return on shareholders' equity, % 1) |
15.8 | 19.1 | 14.4 | 13.5 |
| Net debt/EBITDA | 2.2 | 1.9 | 2.3 | 1.8 |
1) 2005 return on equity for continuing operations is calculated based on profit for the period from continuing operations divided by total equity at the end of the period. Profit for the period from discontinued operations has been subtracted from total equity as at 31 December 2005.
2) Adjusted for REC and Lenenergo gains
| EUR million or as indicated | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 *) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sales | 4,479 | 4,491 | 5,918 |
| Operating profit | 1,847 | 1,455 | 1,864 |
| Operating profit, % of sales | 41.2 | 32.4 | 31.5 |
| Earnings per share, EUR | 1.74 | 1.22 | 1.55 |
| Return on capital employed, % | 16.5 | 13.4 | 16.6 |
| Return on shareholders' equity,% | 19.1 | 14.4 | 18.7 |
| Equity to assets ratio, % | 49 | 48 | 49 |
*) 2005 Fortum's oil operations have been disclosed as discontinued operations until March 31, 2005, when the Annual General Meeting of Fortum decided to distribute approximately 85% of the share in Neste Oil as dividend. The remaining shares were sold in April 2005.
In the first-quarter, Fortum booked a gain of EUR 180 million after its associated company, Hafslund ASA in Norway, had sold shares in Renewable Energy Corporation (REC). This corresponds to EUR 0.20 per share in Fortum's firstquarter result. In the third-quarter, Fortum sold its stake in the Russian JSC Lenenergo for EUR 295 million. This resulted in a gain of EUR 232 million which corresponds to EUR 0.26 per share in Fortum's third quarter result.
Fortum participated in the share issue of the Russian Territorial Generating Company 1 (TGC-1) in the third-quarter and maintained its 25.7% ownership. The total value of Fortum's subscription was EUR 243 million.
In 2007, the Power Generation segment's achieved Nordic power price was EUR 39.7 (37.1) per megawatthour (MWh), up by 7% from previous year and clearly higher than the average spot price of electricity in Nord Pool, the Nordic power exchange. This was mainly thanks to Fortum's consistent hedging strategy. The average spot price of electricity in Nord Pool was EUR 27.9 (48.6) per megawatt-hour (MWh), approximately 43% lower than the same period previous year.
Sales, EUR billion
According to preliminary statistics, the Nordic countries consumed 397 (393) terawatt hours (TWh) of electricity in 2007, an increase of about 1% from previous year.
The year 2007 started with the Nordic water reservoirs being at the long-term average level. Throughout the year, the Nordic water reservoirs were above the long-term average. At the end of December, the Nordic water reservoirs were 8 TWh above the long-term average and 11 TWh above the corresponding level in 2006.
During year 2007, the average spot price for power in Nord Pool was EUR 27.9 (48.6) per megawatt-hour, or 43% lower than in 2006. The low spot price was due to the strong hydrological situation and low CO2 emission prices for 2007.
During year 2007, the average market price for CO2 emissions was EUR 0.7 (18.5) per tonne, or 96% lower than in the previous year.
During the second half of 2007, coal prices increased dramatically. Oil prices increased during most of the year and reached historically high levels, peaking close to 100 US dollars per barrel towards the end of the year.
In Germany, the average spot price for the fourth quarter was higher compared to the Nordic area, resulting in a net export from the Nordic area to Germany.
Weekly filling as energy, TWh
Fortum's total power generation during 2007 was 52.2 (54.4) TWh, of which 51.1 (53.2) TWh was in the Nordic countries, representing 13% (14%) of the total Nordic electricity consumption.
At year end, Fortum's total power generating capacity was 10,920 (10,913) MW, of which 10,775 (10,768) MW was in the Nordic countries. At year end, Fortum's total heat production capacity was 11,223 (10,883) MW, of which 9,381 (9,239) MW was in the Nordic countries.
During the year 2007, approximately 89% (84%) of the generated power was CO2-free. A preliminary estimate for CO2 emissions from Fortum's own power plants in 2007 totals 10.4 (11.0) million tonnes, 0.6 million tonnes lower than in the previous year. The emissions subject to EU's emissions trading scheme were to about 9.8 (10.6) million tonnes. Both figures include Fortum's 308 MW share of the Meri-Pori power plant that was leased out in January 2007. The average volume of emission allowances allocated to Fortum's installations in various countries totalled approximately 8.1 million tonnes per year during 2005–2007.
Fortum's total power and heat generation figures are presented below. In addition, the segment reviews include the respective figures by segment.
Fortum's total power sales were 59.7 (61.6) TWh, of which 58.5 (60.2) TWh were in the Nordic countries. This represents approximately 15% (15%) of Nordic electricity consumption during January–December. Heat sales in the Nordic countries amounted to 20.4 (20.1) TWh and in other countries to 6.7 (6.7) TWh.
| Fortum's total electricity*) | and heat sales | |
|---|---|---|
| ------------------------------ | -- | ---------------- |
| EUR million | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Electricity sales | 2,370 | 2,437 | 2,002 |
| Heat sales | 1,096 | 1,014 | 867 |
| Fortum's total electricity sales*) | by area | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| TWh | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 |
| Sweden | 27.6 | 28.5 | 30.4 |
| Finland | 29.0 | 29.6 | 26.0 |
| Other countries | 3.1 | 3.5 | 3.3 |
| Total | 59.7 | 61.6 | 59.7 |
| TWh | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Power generation | 52.2 | 54.4 | 52.3 |
| Heat generation | 26.1 | 25.8 | 25.1 |
| TWh | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hydropower | 20.0 | 19.8 | 21.2 |
| Nuclear power | 24.9 | 24.4 | 25.8 |
| Thermal power | 6.2 | 9.0 | 4.2 |
| Total | 51.1 | 53.2 | 51.2 |
| % | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hydropower | 39 | 37 | 42 |
| Nuclear power | 49 | 46 | 50 |
| Thermal power | 12 | 17 | 8 |
| Total | 100 | 100 | 100 |
| 2007 | 2006 | 2005 |
|---|---|---|
| 9.2 | 9.3 | 9.5 |
| 11.1 | 10.7 | 9.8 |
| 6.8 | 6.8 | 4.5 |
| 27.1 | 26.8 | 23.8 |
*) Nord Pool transactions are calculated as a net amount of hourly sales and purchases at the Group level.
**) Including the UK, which is reported in the Power Generation segment, other sales.
| EUR million | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Power Generation | 2,350 | 2,439 | 2,058 |
| Heat | 1,356 | 1,268 | 1,063 |
| Distribution | 769 | 753 | 707 |
| Markets | 1,683 | 1,912 | 1,365 |
| Other | 81 | 78 | 91 |
| Eliminations | –1,760 | –1,959 | –1,407 |
| Total | 4,479 | 4,491 | 3,877 |
| EUR million | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Power Generation | 1,093 | 985 | 854 |
| Heat | 290 | 253 | 253 |
| Distribution | 231 | 250 | 244 |
| Markets | –1 | –4 | 30 |
| Other | –49 | –47 | –47 |
| Total | 1,564 | 1,437 | 1,334 |
| EUR million | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Power Generation | 1,125 | 980 | 825 |
| Heat | 294 | 264 | 269 |
| Distribution | 465 | 252 | 251 |
| Markets | 12 | –6 | 32 |
| Other | –49 | –35 | –30 |
| Total | 1,847 | 1,455 | 1,347 |
Group operating profit totalled EUR 1,847 (1,455) million. Comparable operating profit increased by EUR 127 million to EUR 1,564 (1,437) million. The Power Generation and Heat segments contributed to the increase.
The gain on the sale of Lenenergo shares increased third-quarter operating profit by EUR 232 million. The gain was booked in the Distribution segment's operating profit.
Profit before taxes was EUR 1,934 (1,421) million.
The Group's net financial expenses increased to EUR 154 (103) million. The increase is mainly attributable to a higher average level of debt and a lower, EUR 7 (30) million, change in the fair value of derivatives.
The share of profit of associates and joint ventures was EUR 241 (69) million. The biggest contributor was Hafslund ASA in Norway. In the first quarter, Hafslund announced that it had completed the sale of 35 million shares in Renewable Energy Corporation (REC) at NOK 138 per share. As a consequence, Fortum booked a gain of EUR 180 million, corresponding to EUR 0.20 per share, in its firstquarter result. After this transaction, Hafslund still owns 70.4 million shares in REC.
Hafslund is showing the fair value change in the REC shareholding through the income statement, while Fortum is showing the fair value change in equity. The cumulative fair value change booked in Fortum's equity and based on the remaining number of shares reported by Hafslund was approximately EUR 790 million at the end of December 2007.
Fortum received EUR 145 million in dividends from Hafslund in the second quarter. EUR 123 million of the dividends was due to the sale of REC.
Minority interests accounted for EUR 56 (49) million. The minority interests are mainly attributable to Fortum Värme Holding, in which the City of Stockholm has a 50% economic interest.
Taxes for the period totalled EUR 326 (301) million. The tax rate according to the income statement was 16,9% (21,2%), mainly due to the high share of profit of associates and the capital gain from the sale of Lenenergo shares. Excluding the share of profits of associates and Lenenergo sales gains, the tax rate was 22.3% (22.3%).
The profit for the period was EUR 1,608 (1,120) million. Fortum's earnings per share were EUR 1.74 (1.22). Return on capital employed was 16.5% for the year (13.4% for 2006), and return on shareholders' equity was 19.1% for the year (14.4% for 2006). Return on capital employed and return on shareholders' equity, excluding REC and Lenenergo sales gains, were 14.0% and 15.8%, respectively.
n Discontinued operations
The business area comprises power generation and sales in the Nordic countries and the provision of operation and maintenance services in the Nordic area and selected international markets. The Power Generation segment sells its production to Nord Pool. The segment includes the business units Generation, Portfolio Management and Trading (PMT), and Service.
| EUR million | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sales | 2,350 | 2,439 | 2,058 |
| – power sales | 2,019 | 2,059 | 1,682 |
| – other sales | 331 | 380 | 376 |
| Operating profit | 1,125 | 980 | 825 |
| Comparable operating profit | 1,093 | 985 | 854 |
| Net assets (at period-end) | 7,148 | 6,734 | 5,954 |
| Return on net assets, % | 19.2 | 16.1 | 14.0 |
| Comparable return on net assets, % | 17.7 | 16.9 | 14.5 |
| Gross Investments | 390 | 240 | 130 |
| Average number of employees | 3,475 | 4,147 | 4,374 |
In 2007, the segment's power generation in the Nordic countries was 46.1 (48.3) TWh, of which about 20.0 (19.8) TWh or 43% (41%) was hydropower-based, 24.9 (24.4) TWh or 54% (51%) nuclear power-based, and 1.2 (4.1) TWh or 3% (8%) thermal power-based. Although the availability of the Swedish nuclear power plants increased slightly compared to 2006, the prolonged outages and unplanned shutdowns had a negative effect of approximately 1.3 TWh to the nuclear power production. Less thermal power was generated due to the low spot price. In January-December, approximately 95% (89%) of the segment's power generation was CO2-free.
At year end, the segment's power generation capacity totalled 9,560 (9,540) MW, of which 9,420 (9,400) MW was in the Nordic countries and 140 (140) MW in other countries.
| TWh | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sweden | 26.0 | 27.1 | 28.4 |
| Finland | 20.1 | 21.1 | 18.8 |
| Other countries | 1.1 | 1.2 | 1.1 |
| Total | 47.2 | 49.4 | 48.3 |
| Nordic sales volume, TWh | 51.8 | 53.9 | 52.6 |
| of which pass-through sales | 5.2 | 4.5 | 4.5 |
| Sales price |
| EUR/MWh | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Generation's Nordic power price* | 39.7 | 37.1 | 31.2 |
*) For the Power Generation segment in the Nordic area, excluding passthrough sales.
Fortum Generation's achieved Nordic power price (excluding pass-through items) was EUR 39.7 per megawatt-hour in 2007, up by 7% from a year ago, while the average spot price in Nord Pool was EUR 27.9, down by 43% from
The comparable operating profit was higher than previous year. The segment's achieved Nordic power price was higher due to the higher hedge prices. Also increased hydropower and nuclear power generation volumes contributed positively. Poor performance in Fortum Service, and the one-time effect from higher nuclear waste management costs reported in the third quarter, decreased comparable operating profit.
In 2007, Fortum's total CO2 emissions subject to ETS were 9.8 million tons, which exceeded Fortum's CO2 emission allowance allocation for the year by 1.3 million tons. However, the Power Generation segment benefited from the insightful timing of CO2 allowance forward sales. Sales contracts made during or before the first quarter 2006 with a December 2007 delivery date contributed EUR 32 million in the fourth quarter results.
Fortum's legal nuclear waste management liability is calculated according to the Nuclear Energy Act and will be decided by the Ministry of Employment and the Economy in early 2008. The future costs will increase mainly due to the new technical solution related to filling material for the tunnels in the final repository. The legal liability increased by approximately EUR 130 million. Fortum is obligated to contribute the funds in full to the State Nuclear Waste Management Fund to cover the legal liability. Fortum was granted periodising of the payments to the fund over six years. The decision was made by the Council of State in December 2007. Fortum booked a one-time effect from higher nuclear waste management costs in its third quarter results.
In July 2007, the Finnish Government granted new operating licences to Loviisa nuclear power plant units 1 and 2. The licences were applied for by Fortum Power and Heat Oy in November 2006. For Loviisa 1, the new licence is valid until the end of 2027, and for Loviisa 2, until the end of 2030. The current licences, which were granted in 1998, expire at the end of 2008. Fortum's Loviisa power plant has produced nuclear power for thirty years.
In 2007, Fortum's Loviisa nuclear power plant exceeded the 8 TWh production limit for the second time in the history of the plant. Unit 2 reached an all-time high with over 4 TWh. The combined capacity factor for the two units at the Loviisa power plant was high, 95.4%.
In June 2007, Fortum submitted to the Finnish Ministry of Trade and Industry the Environmental Impact Assessment
Nord Pool power price 2004–2007, EUR/MWh
(EIA) programme regarding a new nuclear power plant possibly to be built at Hästholmen island in Loviisa. The Ministry gave its statement about the programme in October. Fortum compiles the actual EIA report based on this programme and the statements received about it. The EIA report will be submitted to the Ministry by summer 2008.
Fortum is participating in the project to build the fifth Finnish nuclear power unit (Olkiluoto 3) with a share of approximately 25%. Teollisuuden Voima (TVO), the company that is building and owns the unit, has been informed by the supplier (consortium Areva-Siemens) that the unit will start operation in summer 2011.
The business area comprises heat generation and sales in the Nordic countries and other parts of the Baltic Rim. Fortum is a leading heat producer in the Nordic region. The segment also generates power in the combined heat and power plants (CHP) and sells it to end-customers mainly by longterm contracts as well as to Nord Pool. The segment includes the business units Värme, operating in Sweden, and Heat, operating in other markets
| EUR million | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sales | 1,356 | 1,268 | 1,063 |
| – heat sales | 1,053 | 976 | 834 |
| – power sales | 202 | 198 | 145 |
| – other sales | 101 | 94 | 84 |
| Operating profit | 294 | 264 | 269 |
| Comparable operating profit | 290 | 253 | 253 |
| Net assets (at period-end) | 3,507 | 3,407 | 2,551 |
| Return on net assets, % | 9.3 | 9.6 | 11.6 |
| Comparable return on net assets, % | 9.2 | 9.2 | 11.0 |
| Gross Investments | 327 | 773 | 211 |
| Average number of employees | 2,302 | 2,345 | 2,186 |
| Heat sales by area | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| TWh | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 |
| Sweden | 9.2 | 9.3 | 9.5 |
| Finland | 11.1 | 10.7 | 9.8 |
| Other countries | 4.8 | 4.7 | 2.4 |
| Total | 25.1 | 24.7 | 21.7 |
| Power sales |
| TWh | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total | 5.0 | 5.0 | 4.1 |
The segment's heat sales during the year totalled 25.1 (24.7) TWh. Power sales at combined heat and power plants (CHP) totalled 5.0 (5.0) TWh.
The comparable operating profit of the Heat segment in the year 2007 was EUR 37 million higher than previous year. An efficient fuel mix had a positive impact on the results in Sweden. Also the acquisition of Fortum Espoo (E.ON Finland) and efficiency improvements in Poland improved the results.
The number of district heating customers increased in 2007, thanks to successful new sales in all markets.
Segment's district heating and industrial steam sales, TWh
Segment's district heating and industrial steam sales by area, TWh
Fortum owns and operates distribution and regional networks and distributes electricity to a total of 1.6 million customers in Sweden, Finland, Norway and Estonia.
| EUR million | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sales | 769 | 753 | 707 |
| – distribution network transmission | 648 | 636 | 592 |
| – regional network transmission | 81 | 80 | 82 |
| – other sales | 40 | 37 | 33 |
| Operating profit | 465 | 252 | 251 |
| Comparable operating profit | 231 | 250 | 244 |
| Net assets (at period-end) | 3,243 | 3,412 | 3,021 |
| Return on net assets, % | 14.5 | 8.4 | 8.8 |
| Comparable return on net assets,% | 7.5 | 8.3 | 8.6 |
| Gross Investments | 237 | 313 | 115 |
| Average number of employees | 1,060 | 983 | 1,008 |
In 2007, the volume of distribution and regional network transmissions totalled 26.0 (24.6) TWh and 18.1 (18.1) TWh, respectively.
Electricity transmissions via the regional distribution network totalled 14.9 (15.0) TWh in Sweden and 3.2 (3.1) TWh in Finland.
| TWh | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sweden | 14.3 | 14.4 | 14.4 |
| Finland | 9.2 | 7.7 | 6.3 |
| Norway | 2.3 | 2.3 | 2.2 |
| Estonia | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.2 |
| Total | 26.0 | 24.6 | 23.1 |
| 31 Dec | 31 Dec | 31 Dec | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Thousands | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 |
| Sweden | 871 | 865 | 860 |
| Finland | 591 | 580 | 410 |
| Norway | 98 | 97 | 97 |
| Estonia | 24 | 23 | 23 |
| Total | 1,584 | 1,565 | 1,390 |
The comparable operating profit of the segment was 231 million EUR for the whole year, EUR 19 million lower than previous year. The main reason for the decrease in 2007 compared to previous year was the EUR 13 million costs caused by the storms in the first half of the year. The new customer and billing system in Sweden continued to cause extra costs in 2007. Also automatic meter installations in Sweden and the one-time price adjustment during the last quarter in Finland decreased operating profit. The acquisition of Fortum Espoo (E.ON Finland) contributed positively to the segment.
The after-tax gain of EUR 232 million from selling the holding in JSC Lenenergo has been booked in Distribution segment's third-quarter operating profit.
Volume of distributed electricity in distribution networks by country, TWh
Markets is responsible for retail sales of electricity to a total of 1.3 million private and business customers as well as to other electricity retailers in Sweden, Finland and Norway. Markets buys its electricity through Nord Pool.
| Sales | 1,683 | 1,912 | 1,365 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Operating profit | 12 | –6 | 32 |
| Comparable operating profit | –1 | –4 | 30 |
| Net assets (at period-end) | 247 | 176 | 228 |
| Return on net assets, % | 6.9 | –1.6 | 17.4 |
| Comparable return on net assets, % | –0.6 | –0.8 | 16.4 |
| Gross investments | 3 | 14 | 10 |
| Average number of employees | 936 | 825 | 745 |
ity products. Fortum is the market leader on the Nordic market in selling environmentally labelled electricity. Markets Nordic customer net flow in 2007 was slightly negative due to tightened competition especially in Sweden.
The SKI (Svensk Kvalitetsindex) customer satisfaction survey in Sweden and EPSI (Extended Performance Satisfaction Index) in Finland showed that the customer satisfaction among Fortum's customers improved clearly in 2007.
| EUR million | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sales | 1,683 | 1,912 | 1,365 | |
| Operating profit | 12 –6 |
32 | ||
| Comparable operating profit | –1 –4 |
30 | ||
| Net assets (at period-end) | 247 176 |
228 | ||
| Return on net assets, % | 6.9 –1.6 |
17.4 | ||
| Comparable return on net assets, % | –0.6 | –0.8 | 16.4 | |
| Gross investments | 3 14 |
10 | ||
| Average number of employees | 936 825 |
745 | ||
| In 2007, Markets electricity sales totalled 39.6 (42.1) TWh. In 2007, the segment was unable to achieve a positive comparable operating profit. This was partly due to retail sales in Finland where consumer prices lagged behind Markets' procurement prices (Nord Pool wholesale power prices). The new customer and billing system in Sweden con tinued to cause extra costs in 2007. Despite the tight price competition, Fortum's customer net flow in Finland was clearly positive in 2007, mainly due to increasing sales of environmentally labelled electric |
50 40 30 20 10 0 |
|||
| Capital expenditures, investments and divestments of shares, continuing operations |
||||
| EUR million | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 | |
| Capital expenditure | ||||
| Intangible assets | 11 | 21 | 11 | 1,500 1500 |
| Property, plant and equipment | 644 | 464 | 335 | |
| Total | 655 | 485 | 346 | 1,000 1000 |
| Gross investments in shares | ||||
| Subsidiaries | 18 | 765 | 87 | 500 500 |
| Associated companies | 295 | 124 | 47 | |
| Available for sale financial assets | 4 | 21 | – | 0 0 |
| Total | 317 | 910 | 134 |
Capital expenditures and investments in shares in January-December totalled EUR 972 (1,395) million. Investments, excluding acquisitions, were EUR 655 (485) million.
In September, Fortum participated in the share issue of the Russian TGC-1, subscribing to new shares in the company. The total value of Fortum's subscription was approximately EUR 243 million. With this subscription, Fortum maintained its 25.7% stake in TGC-1 and its position as the second largest shareholder of the company.
Capital expenditure and gross investments in shares continuing operations, EUR million
In July 2007, Fortum acquired the district heating company EC Wojkowice in Poland. The annual heat sales of the company total some 64 GWh and electricity sales 320 MWh. The company has 34 employees.
The CHP projects in Suomenoja, Finland, in Częstochowa, Poland, and in Tartu, Estonia, are proceeding. The preparations are continuing for the CHP plants in Värtan and Brista in Sweden and in Järvenpää, Finland.
Fortum Corporation Annual Report 2007 – Financials Operating and Financial Review
Estonia and Riga, Latvia, were transferred to Fortum in January and February, respectively.
| The ownership of Vattenfall's heat operations in Pärnu, Estonia and Riga, Latvia, were transferred to Fortum in January and February, respectively. In November, Fortum Värme received environmental permit for the biofuel-based CHP plant in Värtan. The envi ronmental permit also covers the installation of flue gas condensers in the existing units at the Värtan plant and this work is already on-going. |
Distribution Fortum sold its slightly over 1 St. Petersburg and the Leningrad region. amounted to EUR 64 million in 2007. |
||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Financing | |||||
| EUR million | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 | Interest-bearing net | |
| Interest expense | –220 | –176 | –203 | debt, EUR million | |
| Interest income | 76 | 50 | 46 | 6,000 6000 |
3.0 3.0 |
| Fair value gains and losses | 7 | 30 | 40 | 5,000 5000 |
2.5 2.5 |
| Other financial expenses | –17 | –7 | –18 | 4,000 4000 |
2.0 2.0 |
| Finance costs – net | –154 | –103 | –135 | 3,000 3000 |
1.5 1.5 |
| Interest-bearing liabilities | 4,893 | 4,502 | 3,946 | 2,000 2000 |
1.0 1.0 |
| Cash and cash equivalents | 427 | 157 | 788 | 1,000 1000 |
0.5 0.5 |
| Interest-bearing net debt | 4,466 | 4,345 | 3,158 | 0 0 03 04 05 06 07 |
0.0 0 |
Distribution
Fortum sold its slightly over 1 /3 stake in JSC Lenenergo for approximately EUR 295 million. The decision to sell the Lenenergo shares is in line with Fortum's strategy in Russia to invest primarily in generation assets. The current business of Lenenergo is electricity distribution in the City of St. Petersburg and the Leningrad region.
The investments in automatic meters in Sweden amounted to EUR 64 million in 2007.
At year end, the interest-bearing net debt stood at EUR 4,466 (4,345) million, resulting in a total increase in net debt of EUR 121 million for the year. The increase in net debt is primarily linked to capital returns and ongoing investment programme. In April Fortum paid dividends amounting to EUR 1,122 million. Net debt to EBITDA, excluding the nonrecurring gains, was 2.2 at the end of the year.
The Group's net financial expenses for the full year 2007 were EUR 154 (103) million. The increase is mainly attributable to higher average net debt and somewhat higher average interest rates in 2007. However, net financial expenses include fair value gains on financial instruments of EUR 7 (30) million.
The average interest rate of Fortum's interest bearing gross debt (including derivatives) in 2007 was 4,3% (4,1%).
Group liquidity remained good. Year-end cash and
marketable securities totaled EUR 427 (157) million. In addition, the Group had a total of EUR 1.4 (1.3) billion available for drawings under committed credit facilities, including the EUR 1.2 billion syndicated revolving credit facility due in 2011 and bilateral overdraft facilities which are renewed on an annual basis.
During the year Fortum raised approx. EUR 850 million in new long-term financing to finance capital returns, maturing loans and the ongoing investment programme. The tenors of these financing arrangements varied between 5 and 10 years and consisted of a SEK 6.1 billion (approx. EUR 660 million) bond issue as well as bilateral loan contracts of SEK 1.75 billion (approx. EUR 190 million).
Fortum Corporation's long-term credit rating from Moody's and Standard and Poor's was A2 (stable) and A- (stable), respectively.
Research and development (R&D) is important to Fortum's competitiveness and plays a key role in the company's strategy to grow sustainably.
Fortum's R&D approach is based on networking and collaboration with leading external partners, such as research institutes, universities, and equipment or plant manufacturers. However, in key areas of strategic importance, Fortum also maintains and further develops in-house expertise and activities. In 2007, Fortum revised its R&D vision and strategy, and initiated several new R&D programmes.
Fortum is continuously involved in numerous R&D activities. In order to strengthen R&D aiming at new sustainable growth initiatives, five new R&D programmes were launched in 2007: clean coal and gas technologies, bio-growth, future production technologies, energy optimisation for customers and growth in Russia.
The group's total R&D expenditure in 2007 was EUR 21 (17) million. The increase in expenses is mainly attributable to new programmes and activities initiated in 2007.
Fortum's R&D expenditure amounts to 0.5% of sales (0.4% in 2006) and 0.8% (0.6%) of total expenses. The
level of Fortum's R&D expenditure is around the average among European power and heat companies.
For further details of research and development see pages 14–15 in the Review of Operations publication of the Annual report.
"To be the benchmark power and heat company excelling in sustainability." This revised vision statement emphasises what Fortum wants to and will do in the future.
In accordance with the new vision statement, Fortum revisited its sustainability policy in 2007. The new policy states that the company wants to be a forerunner and
Commitment to sustainable development is further elaborated in Fortum's Code of Conduct and guiding principles. This policy is turned into action by setting development targets on Fortum's Sustainability Agenda.
In order to help put the new vision statement and sustainability policy into action, a new Corporate Sustainability unit was founded in 2007. The purpose of the unit is to promote sound practices that support business and leadership in sustainability. The shared strategic goal for the whole company is to make sustainability a success factor.
Mitigating climate change is one of Fortum's most important goals. The ultimate goal is to become a CO2-free power and heat company. In 2007, climate efforts were strengthened on all fronts: in production, among personnel and customers as well as in R&D.
| 2007 | 2006 | 2005 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| R&D expenditure, EUR million | 21 | 17 | 14 |
| R&D expenditure, % of sales | 0.5 | 0.4 | 0.4 |
| R&D expenditure, % of total expenses |
0.8 | 0.6 | 0.6 |
In 2007, 89% of the electricity generated by Fortum was free of carbon dioxide emissions. CO2 emissions from Fortum's own power plants (including Meri-Pori) totalled 10.4 million tonnes, some 5% lower than the previous year. The specific CO2 emissions of the company's total electricity generation, including wholly and partly-owned power generation, was 63 g/kWh, which is among the lowest of the major European power companies and clearly below Fortum's target value. The five-year average for the specific CO2 emissions 2003–2007 was 93 g/KWh.
Fortum wants to make its commitment to sustainability, especially climate-benign production, a success factor for the company. To this aim, Fortum set new, stricter targets for CO2 emissions from energy production. Within the EU, Fortum's long-term goal is to continuously keep its emissions among the best of European energy companies. In electricity production, the new target is to decrease the CO2 emissions to less than 80 g/kWh by 2020 as a fiveyear average. In the EU25 area, the average emissions of electricity producers have been around 400 g/kWh during recent years.
In heat production, Fortum's aim is to reduce the specific emissions in each country by at least 10% from 2006 until 2020. Outside the EU, Fortum is committed to increasing the energy efficiency of power plants and thus reducing specific emissions.
In 2007, there were 38 (55) occupational accidents leading to an absence of more than one working day. This means 2.8 (3.7) injuries per one million working hours, which was above Fortum's target value of 2 for 2007.
For further details on sustainability, see pages 32–42 in the Review of Operations publication of the Annual Report.
The average number of employees in the Group during the period from January to December was 8,304 (8,910). The number of employees at the end of the period was 8,303 (8,134), of which 7,954 (7,681) were permanent employees.
The number of employees in the parent company, Fortum Corporation, at year end totalled 583 (566).
| 2007 | 2006 | 2005 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average number of employees | 8,304 | 8,910 | 8,939 |
| Total amount of employee costs, EUR million |
495 | 508 | 481 |
For further details of group personnel see Note 14 of the Consolidated Financial Statements. See also pages 39–41 in the Review of Operations publication of the Annual report.
Employees per country 2007
Fortum's main holdings in Russia stem from its past ownership in JSC Lenenergo, an integrated power and heat company in the St. Petersburg region. In late 2005, the company's generation assets were spun-off and a regional generation company, TGC-1, was formed. JSC Lenenergo continued as a regional distribution company. In the third quarter 2007, Fortum sold its holding in JSC Lenenergo.
The sale was in line with Fortum's strategy in Russia of focusing on power generation. Fortum maintained its
25.7% ownership in the regional generation company TGC-1.
Fortum is evaluating opportunities to participate in share issues and ownership restructurings in the Russian power generation sector in order to further strengthen its position in the Russian wholesale power market.
In October, Fortum sold its approximately 0.7% holding in the Russian Wholesale Generating Company 5 (WGC-5) for approximately EUR 28 million.
The Norwegian Renewable Energy Corporation (REC) is partly owned by Fortum's associated company Hafslund ASA. Fortum shows the fair value changes of REC in equity.
At year end, the cumulative fair value change booked in Fortum's equity was approximately EUR 790 million.
REC's share price has decreased since the year end. Based on REC's closing price on 29 January 2008, the cumulative fair value change in Fortum's equity would have been approximately EUR 400 million.
The key market driver influencing Fortum's business performance is the Nordic wholesale price of electricity. Key drivers behind the wholesale price development are the Nordic hydrological situation and supply-demand balance, CO2 emissions allowance prices and fuel prices. The Swedish krona exchange rate also affects Fortum's reported result, as results generated by Fortum in Sweden are translated into euros.
Fortum's financial results are exposed to a number of strategic, financial and operational risks. For further details on Fortum's risks and risk management, see Risk management section of the Operating and Financial Review and Note 3 in the Consolidated Financial Statements.
According to general market information, electricity consumption in the Nordic countries is predicted to increase by about 1% a year over the next few years.
In mid-January 2008, the Nordic water reservoirs were about 9 TWh above the long-term average and 6 TWh above the corresponding level of 2007. In late-January, the market price for emissions allowances for 2008 was about EUR 20–21 per tonne of CO2. At the same time, the electricity forward price for the rest of 2008 was around EUR 44–45 per MWh and for 2009 around EUR 49–51 per MWh.
The first and last quarters of the year are usually the strongest quarters for the power and heat businesses.
Fortum Power Generation's achieved Nordic power price typically depends on e.g. the hedge ratio, hedge price, spot price, utilisation and optimisation of Fortum's flexible production portfolio – even on an hourly basis – and currency fluctuations. If Fortum would not hedge any of its production volumes, a 1 EUR/MWh change in the spot price would result in approximately a EUR 50 million change in Fortum's annual operating profit.
At the beginning of January 2008, Fortum had hedged approximately 70% of the Power Generation segment's estimated Nordic electricity sales volume for the year 2008 at approximately EUR 44 per MWh. For the calendar year 2009, approximately 25% of the Power Generation segment's estimated Nordic electricity sales volume was hedged at approximately EUR 46 per MWh. These hedge ratios may vary significantly depending on Fortum's actions on the electricity derivatives markets. Hedge prices are also influenced by changes in the SEK/EUR exchange rates, as part of the hedges are conducted in SEK.
The Swedish government has increased nuclear capacity and hydro property tax rates. It has also introduced changes in the Swedish CO2-tax. Fortum estimates that the additional cost from the tax rate increases and changes will be just under EUR 30 million in 2008.
Fortum's results in 2007 were good, despite challenging market conditions and low Nord Pool spot prices. The Group's financial position is strong. With its flexible and climate-benign production portfolio, Fortum continues to be well positioned for the future.
Risk management is an integrated part of business planning and performance management. Its purpose is to enable the execution of the company's strategy and to support the business in achieving financial targets.
Involvement in the power and heat business exposes Fortum to several types of financial, operational and strategic risks. Electricity prices, which in turn are affected by the weather in the Nordic region and the development of the global commodity markets, are the main source of financial risk. Owning and operating power and heat production facilities and distribution networks exposes Fortum to operational risks. The ongoing restructuring of the electricity markets in Europe exposes Fortum to strategic risks such as changes in regulation and taxation within local, regional and European electricity markets.
The objective of risk management in Fortum is to enable the execution of the company's strategy, to ensure the achievement of agreed financial targets and to avoid unwanted operational events.
Fortum is continuously developing its risk management capabilities to cope with prevailing market conditions, developing operations and an ever changing business environment. During 2007 the main focus has been on enhancing the framework for operational risk management including initiating a project to further develop internal controls.
Fortum's Board of Directors approves the Corporate Risk Policy which sets the objective, principles and division of responsibilities for risk management activities within the Group as well as defining the overall risk management process. The main principle is that risks are managed at source, and each business and service unit submits a risk policy to The President and CEO for approval.
Corporate guidelines are issued for those risks which are managed on Group level. Corporate Treasury is responsible for managing the Group's currency, interest rate, and liquidity and refinancing risks as well as for insurance management. Corporate Credit Control is responsible for assessing and consolidating the Group's exposure to counterpart risk, monitoring the creditworthiness of counterparts and for approving counterpart credit limits. Corporate IT is responsible for managing IT information and security risks. There are also corporate functions dealing with risks related to human resources, laws and regulation, and sustainability.
The Board of Directors, assisted by the Audit Committee, is responsible for risk oversight within the Group. Corporate Risk Management, an independent function headed by the Chief Risk Officer (CRO), reports to the Chief Financial Officer (CFO), and is responsible for assessing and reporting the Group's consolidated risk exposure to the Board of Directors and Group Management. Corporate Risk Management also monitors and reports risk in relation to mandates approved by The President and CEO.
Business and service units organise their own risk management and control functions. In order to maintain a strict segregation of duties, risk control functions at the business and service unit level are responsible for reporting risks to Corporate Risk Management.
The risk management process consists of event identification, risk assessment, risk response and risk control. Risks are primarily identified and assessed by business and
service units in accordance with corporate guidelines and models that are approved by Corporate Risk Management. Quantitative assessments are used where feasible, and are harmonised across different products and units. Business and service units are also responsible for responding to risks by taking appropriate actions. Risk responses can be one of, or a combination of, mitigating, transferring or absorbing the risk.
Risk control, monitoring and reporting is carried out by the business and service units' risk control functions. The frequency of reporting is dependent upon the scope and need of the business. For example, financial risks, including trading activities and any breaches of approved limits, are reported daily whereas strategic and operational risks are reported as part of the annual business planning process. Corporate Risk Management assesses and reports the Group's consolidated exposure to financial risks to Group Management and the Board of Directors on a monthly basis. In addition any BU level limit breaches are immediately reported to Group Management.
Fortum seeks growth both by leveraging organic growth opportunities and actively participating in further Nordic consolidation. Fortum's aim is to grow profitably in chosen market areas: the Nordic countries, Russia, Poland and the Baltic countries. The growth possibilities are in part subject to regulatory supervision and political decisions.
Nordic/EU Policy harmonisation, infrastructure development and integration of the Nordic electricity market towards continental Europe depend partly on the actions of authorities. Changes in the market environment and regulation could endanger the implementation of the market-driven development of the electricity market. Fortum promotes market-driven development by maintaining an active dialogue with all stakeholders.
Development of the political and regulatory environment has a major impact on the energy industry and on the conditions of its business operations. To manage these risks and proactively participate in the development of the political and regulatory framework, including energy taxation, Fortum maintains an active and on-going dialogue with the bodies involved in the development of laws and regulations. Specifically, this includes close co-operation with national industry organisations and Eurelectric at the EU level.
Fortum's operations are subject to rules and regulations
set forth by the competition authorities, exchanges, and other regulatory bodies.
Fortum maintains strict internal market conduct rules and has procedures in place to prevent, for example, the use of proprietary information before it is published. Segregation of duties and internal controls are enforced to minimize the possibilities of unauthorised activities.
Financial risk refers to the potential negative effects of market price movements, volume changes, liquidity events or counterpart events. A number of different methods, such as Value-at-Risk and Profit-at-Risk, are used throughout the Group to quantify financial risks. In particular, the potential impact of price and volume risks of electricity, weather, CO2 and the main fuels are assessed taking into account their interdependencies. Stress-testing is carried out in order to assess the effects of extreme price movements on Fortum's earnings.
Financial risk taking in business units aims to capture potential upside by optimising hedging or by trading in the markets. Risk taking is limited by risk mandates. Risk mandates include minimum EBIT levels for the business units that are set by the CEO. Volumetric limits, Value-at-Risk limits, Stop Loss limits and counterpart exposure limits are also in place.
For further information on hedge ratios, exposures, sensitivities and outstanding derivatives contracts, see Note 3 Financial risk management.
Fortum is exposed to electricity market price movements mainly through its power generation and customer sales businesses. The short-term factors affecting electricity prices on the Nordic market include hydrological conditions, temperature, CO2 allowance prices, fuel prices, and the import/export situation. Fortum manages exposure to electricity price risk through the use of hedging strategies that are executed by the business units within set mandates. Hedges for electricity price risks consist of electricity derivatives contracts.
Power and heat generation, customer sales, and electricity distribution volumes are subject to changes in, for example, hydrological conditions and temperature. Although volume risks in power and heat generation are partly mitigated through generation flexibility, changes in volumes are closely monitored so that hedges can be adjusted accordingly.
The European Union has established an emissions trading scheme to limit the amount of CO2 emissions. Part of Fortum's power and heat generation is subject to requirements of the trading scheme. Fortum manages its exposure to CO2 allowance prices through the use of CO2 forwards and by ensuring that the costs of allowances are taken into account during production planning.
Heat and power generation requires the use of fuels that are purchased from global or local markets. The main fuels used by the Group are uranium, coal, natural gas, peat, oil, and various bio-fuels such as wood pellets and palm oil. Exposure to fuel prices is to some extent limited because of Fortum's flexible generation possibilities, which allow for switching between different fuels according to prevailing market conditions, and in some cases, the fuel price risk can be transferred to the customer. The remaining exposure to fuel price risk is mitigated through fixed price purchases that cover forecasted consumption levels. Fixed price purchases can be either for physical deliveries or in the form of financial hedges.
Fortum engages in a certain level of trading for profit based on a high level of market knowledge. Fortum's proprietary trading activities are limited to standardised electricity, coal and CO2 allowance contracts mainly traded through established markets such as Nord Pool, EEX and ICE.
Risks associated with trading activities are limited through strict management controls. Stop-Loss mandates are set to limit the cumulative maximum loss during the year, and Value-at-Risk mandates limit the maximum risk taking during one day. All trading risks are monitored and reported on a daily basis.
Fortum's business is capital intensive and the Group has a regular need to raise financing. Fortum has a diversified loan portfolio mainly consisting of long-term bond financing but also a variety of other long- and short-term financing facilities.
Fortum manages liquidity and refinancing risks through a combination of cash positions and committed credit facility agreements with its core banks. The Group shall at all times have access to cash/marketable securities and unused committed credit facilities including overdrafts, to cover all loans maturing within the next twelve-month period. Cash/marketable securities and unused committed credit facilities shall always amount to at least EUR 500 million. Short-term financing (with a tenor less than one year) shall not account for more than EUR 1,200 million
Fortum's debt portfolio consists of interest bearing assets and liabilities on fixed and floating rate bases with differing maturity profiles. Fortum manages the duration of the debt portfolio by entering into different types of financing contracts and interest-rate derivative contracts such as interest rate swaps and forward rate agreements (FRAs).
Fortum has cash flows, assets and liabilities in currencies other than in euro. Changes in exchange rates can therefore have an effect on Fortum's earnings and balance sheet. The main currency exposure for Fortum is EUR/SEK, arising from the Group's extensive operations in Sweden.
The Group's currency exposures are divided into transaction exposures (foreign exchange exposures relating to contracted cash flows, and balance sheet items where changes in exchange rates will have an impact on earnings and cash flows) and translation exposure (equity in foreign subsidiaries).
Fortum is exposed to counterpart risk whenever there is a contractual obligation with an external counterpart. In order to minimize counterpart risk, Fortum has well established routines and processes to identify, assess and control counterpart exposure. The Group Credit Policy regulates that no contractual obligation should be entered into without a proper, reasonable and viable credit check.
Corporate Credit Control is responsible for assuring stringent controls for all larger individual counterpart exposures. Creditworthiness is continuously monitored through the use of external sources to ensure that actions can be taken immediately when changes occur, and annual credit reviews are performed manually for all larger approved limits. Each Business Unit is responsible for ensuring that exposures remain within approved limits. Mitigation of counterpart risk includes, for example, the use of collateral, managing payment terms and contract length, as well as pursuing netting agreements. Corporate Credit Control continuously monitors and reports counterpart exposures against the approved limits.
Operational risks are defined as the negative effects resulting from inadequate or failed internal processes, people and systems or equipment, or from external events. The main objective of operational risk management is to reduce the risk of unwanted operational events by clearly documenting and automating processes and by ensuring a strict segregation of duties between decision-making and controlling functions. Quality and environmental management systems are tools for achieving this objective, and Fortum has several certifications including ISO 9001 and ISO 14001. Equipment and system risks are primarily managed within maintenance investment planning, and there are contingency plans in place to ensure business continuity.
The Group Insurance Policy governs the management of insurable operational risks. The objective of insurance management is to optimise loss prevention activities, self retentions and insurance coverage in a long-term cost-efficient manner. Fortum has established Group-wide insurance programmes for risks related to property damages, business interruption and liability exposures.
Operational events at power and heat generation or electricity distribution facilities can lead to physical damages, business interruptions, and third-party liabilities. In Sweden, third-party liabilities from dam failures are strictly the plant owner's responsibility. Together with other hydro power producers, Fortum has a shared dam liability insurance program in place that covers Swedish dam failure liabilities up to SEK 7,000 million. Operational risks in production facilities are mitigated by continuous maintenance, condition monitoring, and other operational improvements.
Storms and other unexpected events can result in electricity outages that create costs in the form of repairs and compensations. Although outages are typically short, it is not possible to completely prevent long outages in exceptional circumstances. There is an extensive procedure in place to minimise the length and consequences of outages.
Fortum owns the Loviisa nuclear power plant, and has minority interests in one Finnish and two Swedish companies with nuclear plants. In the Loviisa power plant, assessment and improvement of nuclear safety is a continuous process which is performed under the supervision of the Radiation and Nuclear Safety Authority of Finland (STUK). In Finland and Sweden, third-party liability relating to nuclear accidents is strictly the plant operator's responsibility and must be covered by insurance. As the operator of the Loviisa power plant, Fortum has a statutory insurance policy of SDR 175 million (approximately EUR 230 million) per nuclear incident. Similar insurance policies are in place for the operators where Fortum has a minority interest.
Operating power and heat generation and electricity distribution facilities involves the use, storage and transportation of fuels and materials that can have adverse effects on the environment. The risks involved with these activities and their supply chain are receiving increased attention due to the growing public awareness of sustainable development and the expectations on companies' responsible conduct. Operation and maintenance of the facilities exposes the personnel to potential safety risks. Environmental, health and safety risks are regularly evaluated through internal and external audits and risk assessments, and corrective and preventive actions are launched when necessary.
Environmental, health and safety (EHS) risks arising in investments are systematically evaluated in accordance with Fortum's Investment Evaluation and Approval Procedure. EHS-related responsibilities and liabilities are defined in the contract documents for acquisitions and divestments. Environmental risks and liabilities in relation to past actions have been assessed and necessary provisions made for future remedial costs.
Information security risks are managed centrally by the corporate security and IT functions. Business-specific risks are managed within the business and service units. Corporate policies define guidelines and set procedures for reducing risks and managing IT and other information security incidents. The main objective is to ensure high availability and fast recovery of IT systems.
Fortum Corporation's shares have been listed on OMX Nordic Exchange Helsinki since 18 December 1998. The trading code is FUM1V. Fortum Corporation's shares are in the Finnish book entry system maintained by the Finnish Central Securities Depository Ltd, which also maintains the official share register of Fortum Oyj.
Fortum has one class of shares. By the end of 2007, a total of 886,683,058 shares had been issued. The nominal value of the shares is EUR 3.40 and each share entitles the holder to one vote at the Annual General Meeting. All shares entitle holders to an equal dividend. At the end of 2007 Fortum Corporation's share capital, paid in its entirety and entered in the trade register, was EUR 3,040,460,397.20.
Fortum's share outperformed its European utility peers during 2007. Fortum's share price appreciated 43% during the year, while Dow Jones European Utility Index increased 18% and OMX Helsinki cap index increased 8%.
During 2007, a total of 787.4 (830.8) million Fortum Corporation shares, totalling EUR 18,562 million were traded. Fortum's market capitalisation, calculated using the closing quotation of the last trading day of the year, was EUR 27,319 million. The highest quotation of Fortum Corporation shares on OMX Nordic Exchange Helsinki in 2007 was EUR 31.44, the lowest EUR 20.01, and the volume weighted average quotation EUR 23.73. The closing quotation on the last trading day of the year was EUR 30.81 (21.56).
Market capitalisation 2003–2007, EUR billion
n Number of traded shares/day (monthly average) Share price, EUR (monthly average)
Share trading 2003–2007
Share capital of Fortum Corporation increased by a total of EUR 17,678,000.80 (46,782,711). A total of 5,199,412 (13,759,621) shares subscribed on the basis of share option schemes were entered into the trade register in 2007. At year end the amount of shares that can still be registered for under the share option schemes is a maximum of 0.2% (1.683.987 shares) of Fortum's 2007 year-end share capital and voting rights.
| Number of | Share capital, | |
|---|---|---|
| Share capital 1998–2007 | shares | EUR |
| Fortum established on 7 February 1998 |
500,000 | 1,681,879 |
| Rights issue in 1998 | 782,282,635 | 2,631,409,886 |
| Employee issue in 1998 | 2,000,000 | 6,727,517 |
| 31 December 1998 | 784,782,635 | 2,639,819,282 |
| 31 December 1999 | 784,782,635 | 2,639,819,282 |
| Script issue in 2000 | – | 28,441,677 |
| Rights issue in 2000 | 60,825,940 | 206,808,196 |
| 31 December 2000 | 845,608,575 | 2,875,069,155 |
| 31 December 2001 | 845,608,575 | 2,875,069,155 |
| Subscriptions with options in 2002 | ||
| – 1999 bond loan with warrants | 148,380 | 504,492 |
| – 1999 management share | ||
| option scheme | 3,000 | 10,200 |
| 31 December 2002 | 845,759,955 | 2,875,583,847 |
| Subscriptions with options in 2003 | ||
| – 1999 bond loan with warrants | 159,520 | 542,368 |
| – 1999 management share option scheme |
2,913,000 | 9,904,200 |
| 31 December 2003 | 848,832,475 | 2,886,030,415 |
| Subscriptions with options in 2004 | ||
| – 1999 bond loan with warrants | 4,560,730 | 15,506,482 |
| – 1999 management share option scheme |
7,154,000 | 24,323,600 |
| – 2002 A share options scheme | 6,536,700 | 22,224,780 |
| 31 December 2004 | 867,083,905 | 2,948,085,277 |
| Subscriptions with options in 2005 | ||
| – 1999 bond loan with warrants | 1,284,370 | 4,366,858 |
| – 1999 management share | ||
| option scheme | 1,698,000 | 5,773,200 |
| – 2001 A share options scheme | 1,636,350 | 5,563,590 |
| – 2002 A share options scheme | 3,591,400 | 12,210,760 |
| 31 December 2005 | 875,294,025 | 2,975,999,685 |
| Subscriptions with options in 2006 | ||
| – 2001 A share options scheme | 3,026,200 | 10,289,080 |
| – 2001 B share options scheme | 5,360,133 | 18,224,452 |
| – 2002 A share options scheme | 516,800 | 1,757,120 |
| – 2002 B share options scheme | 4,856,488 | 16,512,059 |
| Cancellation of own shares | –1,660,000 | – |
| 31 December 2006 | 887,393,646 | 3,022,782,396 |
| Share capital 1998–2007 | Number of shares |
Share capital, EUR |
|---|---|---|
| Subscriptions with options in 2007 | ||
| – 2001 A share options scheme | 274,920 | 934,728 |
| – 2001 B share options scheme | 1,339,867 | 4,555,548 |
| – 2002 A share options scheme | 122,100 | 415,140 |
| – 2002 B share options scheme | 3,462,525 | 11,772,585 |
| Cancellation of own shares | –5,910,000 | – |
| 31 December 2007 | 886,683,058 | 3,040,460,397 |
At the beginning of 2007, the Finnish State owned 50.82% of the company's shares. After the changes in amount of shares during 2007, increase in amount of shares due to the share subscriptions under the share option schemes for employees and decrease due to cancellation of repurchased own shares, the Finnish State owned 50.86% of the Company's shares at the end of the year. The Finnish Parliament has authorised the Government to reduce the Finnish State's holding in Fortum Corporation to no less than 50.1% of the share capital and voting rights.
The proportion of nominee registrations and direct foreign shareholders increased to 35.8% (35.4%).
| Shareholders | No. of shares | Holding % |
|---|---|---|
| Finnish State | 450,932,988 | 50.86 |
| Ilmarinen Mutual Pension Insurance Company |
13,396,717 | 1.51 |
| The Social Insurance Institution of Finland, KELA |
7,195,896 | 0.81 |
| The City of Kurikka | 6,203,500 | 0.70 |
| Varma Mutual Pension Insurance Company |
5,850,000 | 0.66 |
| The State Pension Fund | 4,910,000 | 0.55 |
| Etera Mutual Pension Insurance Company |
2,540,000 | 0.29 |
| Mutual Insurance Company Pension-Fennia |
2,250,000 | 0.25 |
| OP-Delta Fund | 1,696,608 | 0.19 |
| Tapiola Mutual Pension Insurance Company |
1,361,176 | 0.15 |
| Nominee registrations | 316,174,236 | 35.66 |
| Other shareholders in total | 74,171,937 | 8.37 |
| Total number of shares | 886,683,058 | 100.00 |
| By shareholder category | % of total amount of shares |
|---|---|
| Finnish shareholders | |
| Corporations | 0.7 |
| Financial and insurance institutions | 1.4 |
| General government | 56.3 |
| Non-profit organisations | 1.0 |
| Households | 4.8 |
| Non-Finnish shareholders | 35.8 |
| Total | 100.00 |
| % of | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| total | |||
| No. of | % of | amount | |
| share | share | No. of | of |
| holders | holders | shares | shares |
| 6,372 | 12.34 | 396,347 | 0.04 |
| 22,182 | 42.97 | 5,923,895 | 0.67 |
| 12,540 | 24.29 | 8,531,340 | 0.96 |
| 9,929 | 19.23 | 24,741,018 | 2.79 |
| 525 | 1.02 | 13,007,192 | 1.47 |
| 64 | 0.12 | 19,041,507 | 2.15 |
| 10 | 0.02 | 34,456,002 | 3.89 |
| 2 | 0.00 | 464,329,705 | 52.37 |
| 51,624 | 100.00 | 570,427,006 | 64.33 |
| transactions on 31 December | 81,816 | 0.01 | |
| 316,174,236 | 35.66 | ||
| 886,683,058 | 100.00 | ||
At the end of 2007, the President and CEO and other members of the Fortum Management Team owned 317,030 (338,000) shares, representing less than 0.04% of the total shares in the Company. A full description of Fortum's equity incentive schemes is shown in Note 31 Employee bonus and incentive schemes together with details on the President and CEO and other members of the Fortum Management Team's shareholdings and interests in equity incentive schemes.
Currently, the Board of Directors has no unused authorisations from the Annual General Meeting of Shareholders to issue convertible loans or bonds with warrants or to issue new shares. The Board of Directors has the authorisation from the Annual General Meeting of Shareholders on 28 March 2007 to buy Fortum Corporation's own shares. The authorisation, amounting to EUR 300 million or 20 million shares, is valid one year from the last year AGM. The shares repurchased by Fortum shall be cancelled through a separate decision made by the Board of Directors of Fortum.
In 2007, Fortum used this authorisation by repurchasing 5.91 million of its own shares at a total price of approximately EUR 175 million. These shares have been cancelled. The average price for the repurchased own shares was EUR 29.69, the lowest price EUR 28.60 and the highest price EUR 30.63. At the end of 2007, Fortum Corporation did not own its own shares.
The Board of Directors proposes that the Annual General Meeting will authorise the Board of Directors to decide to repurchase the company's own shares by using nonrestricted equity. The authorisation is proposed to be valid until next Annual General Meeting.
The maximum amount of shares to be repurchased is 15 million shares. In addition, the amount of funds used for the repurchases may not exceed EUR 300 million. The shares will be repurchased through public trading of the securities on OMX Nordic Exchange Helsinki. The repurchase price of the shares will be based on the public trading price of Fortum shares.
Shares repurchased by the company shall be cancelled by a separate decision of the Board of Directors.
Fortum Corporation's dividend policy states that the company aims to pay a dividend which corresponds to an average payout ratio of 50% to 60%.
Parent company's distributable equity as of 31 December 2007 amounted to EUR 3,119 million. After the end of the financial period there have been no material changes in the financial position of the Company.
The Board of Directors proposes to the Annual General Meeting that Fortum Corporation pay a cash dividend of EUR 1.35 per share for 2007, totalling EUR 1,197 million based on the number of registered shares as of 30 January 2008. Of this total dividend, EUR 0.77 per share is to be paid from Fortum's recurring earnings. An additional dividend of EUR 0.58 per share is proposed in order to steer Fortum's capital structure towards the agreed target. The Annual General Meeting will be held on 1 April 2008 at 1:00 pm at the Finlandia Hall in Helsinki.
*) Board of Directors' proposal for the Annual General Meeting in April 2008
| EUR million | Note | 2007 | 2006 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sales | 5, 6, 10 | 4,479 | 4,491 |
| Other income | 11 | 393 | 80 |
| Materials and services | 12 | –1,572 | –1,673 |
| Employee costs | 14 | –495 | –508 |
| Depreciation, amortisation and impairment charges | 5, 15 | –451 | –429 |
| Other expenses | 13 | –507 | –506 |
| Operating profit | 5 | 1,847 | 1,455 |
| Share of profit of associates and joint ventures | 5 | 241 | 69 |
| Interest expense | 16 | –220 | –176 |
| Interest income | 16 | 76 | 50 |
| Fair value gains and losses on financial instruments | 16 | 7 | 30 |
| Other financial expenses – net | 16 | –17 | –7 |
| Finance costs – net | 16 | –154 | –103 |
| Profit before income tax | 1,934 | 1,421 | |
| Income tax expense | 17 | –326 | –301 |
| Profit for the period | 1,608 | 1,120 | |
| Attributable to: | |||
| Equity holders of the Company | 1,552 | 1,071 | |
| Minority interest | 56 | 49 | |
| 1,608 | 1,120 |
| Earnings per share for profit from total Fortum Group attributable to the equity holders of the Company during the year (in EUR per share) |
18 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Basic | 1.74 | 1.22 | |
| Diluted | 1.74 | 1.21 |
| EUR million | Note | 31 Dec 2007 | 31 Dec 2006 |
|---|---|---|---|
| ASSETS | |||
| Non-current assets | |||
| Intangible assets | 21 | 85 | 96 |
| Property, plant and equipment | 22 | 11,343 | 11,471 |
| Investments in associates and joint ventures | 23 | 2,853 | 2,197 |
| Share in State Nuclear Waste Management Fund | 37 | 516 | 450 |
| Other long-term investments | 24 | 99 | 101 |
| Deferred tax assets | 34 | 3 | 5 |
| Derivative financial instruments | 3 | 153 | 103 |
| Long-term interest-bearing receivables | 25 | 736 | 680 |
| Total non-current assets | 15,788 | 15,103 | |
| Current assets | |||
| Inventories | 26 | 285 | 329 |
| Derivative financial instruments | 3 | 140 | 198 |
| Trade and other receivables | 27 | 1,034 | 1,052 |
| Cash and cash equivalents | 28 | 427 | 157 |
| Total current assets | 1,886 | 1,736 | |
| Total assets | 17,674 | 16,839 | |
| EQUITY | |||
| Capital and reserves attributable the Company's equity holders | |||
| Share capital | 29 | 3,040 | 3,023 |
| Other restricted funds | 78 | 74 | |
| Fair value and other reserves | 30 | 715 | 511 |
| Retained earnings | 4,526 | 4,300 | |
| Total | 8,359 | 7,908 | |
| Minority interests | 32 | 292 | 253 |
| Total equity | 8,651 | 8,161 | |
| Liabilities | |||
| Non-current liabilities | |||
| Interest-bearing liabilities | 33 | 4,288 | 4,060 |
| Derivative financial instruments | 3 | 139 | 134 |
| Deferred tax liabilities | 34 | 1,687 | 1,795 |
| Nuclear provisions | 37 | 516 | 450 |
| Pension and other provisions | 35, 36 | 144 | 186 |
| Other liabilities | 38 | 486 | 485 |
| Total non-current liabilities | 7,260 | 7,110 | |
| Current liabilities | |||
| Interest-bearing liabilities | 33 | 605 | 442 |
| Derivative financial instruments | 3 | 260 | 198 |
| Current tax liability | 29 | 84 | |
| Trade payables and other liabilities | 39 | 869 | 844 |
| Total current liabilities | 1,763 | 1,568 | |
| Total liabilities | 9,023 | 8,678 | |
| Total equity and liabilities | 17,674 | 16,839 |
| Note | Share capital |
Other restricted funds |
Fair value and other reserves |
Treasury shares |
Retained earnings |
Attributable to the equity |
Minority | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EUR million | holders | ||||||||
| Total equity at 31.12.2006 | 3,023 | 74 | 511 | 0 | 4,300 | 7,908 | 253 | 8,161 | |
| Other fair value adjustments 1) | – | – | 372 | – | – | 372 | – | 372 | |
| Cash flow hedges | – | – | –168 | – | – | –168 | –2 | –170 | |
| Translation and other differences | – | – | – | – | –25 | –25 | –11 | –36 | |
| Total gains and losses not recognised in income statement |
– | – | 204 | – | –25 | 179 | –13 | 166 | |
| Profit for the period | – | – | – | – | 1,552 | 1,552 | 56 | 1,608 | |
| Total recognised income for the period | – | – | 204 | – | 1,527 | 1,731 | 43 | 1,774 | |
| Stock options exercised | 29 | 17 | – | – | – | – | 17 | – | 17 |
| Repurchase of own shares | 29 | – | – | – | –175 | – | –175 | – | –175 |
| Cancellation of own shares | 29 | – | – | – | 175 | –175 | 0 | – | 0 |
| Cash dividend | 19 | – | – | – | – | –1,122 | –1,122 | – | –1,122 |
| Changes between restricted and unrestricted equity |
– | 4 | – | – | –4 | 0 | – | 0 | |
| Change in minority due to business combinations |
8 | – | – | – | – | – | – | –4 | –4 |
| Total equity at 31.12.2007 | 3,040 | 78 | 715 | 0 | 4,526 | 8,359 | 292 | 8,651 | |
| Total equity at 31.12.2005 | 2,976 | 72 | –117 | – | 4,220 | 7,151 | 260 | 7,411 | |
| Other fair value adjustments 1) | – | – | 442 | – | – | 442 | – | 442 | |
| Cash flow hedges | – | – | 198 | – | – | 198 | –1 | 197 | |
| Translation and other differences | – | – | – | – | 38 | 38 | 6 | 44 | |
| Total gains and losses not recognised in income statement |
– | – | 640 | – | 38 | 678 | 5 | 683 | |
| Profit for the period | – | – | – | – | 1,071 | 1,071 | 49 | 1,120 | |
| Total recognised income for the period | – | – | 640 | – | 1,109 | 1,749 | 54 | 1,803 | |
| Stock options exercised | 29 | 47 | 2 | – | – | – | 49 | – | 49 |
| Repurchase of own shares | 29 | – | – | – | –30 | – | –30 | – | –30 |
| Cancellation of own shares | 29 | – | – | – | 30 | –30 | 0 | – | 0 |
| Change in the recognition of performance share arrangement |
– | – | –12 | – | –12 | –24 | – | –24 | |
| Cash dividend | 19 | – | – | – | – | –987 | –987 | – | –987 |
| Change in minority due to business combinations |
8 | – | – | – | – | – | – | –61 | –61 |
| Total equity at 31.12.2006 | 3,023 | 74 | 511 | 0 | 4,300 | 7,908 | 253 | 8,161 |
1) Includes the fair value change of Renewable Energy Corporation (REC) shareholding in Hafslund. See Note 23 Investments in associated companies and joint ventures and Note 45 Events after the balance sheet date.
| EUR million | Note | 2007 | 2006 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cash flow from operating activities | |||
| Net profit for the period | 1,608 | 1,120 | |
| Adjustments: | |||
| Income tax expenses | 326 | 301 | |
| Finance costs – net | 154 | 103 | |
| Share of profit of associates and joint ventures | –241 | –69 | |
| Depreciation, amortisation and impairment charges | 451 | 429 | |
| Operating profit before depreciations | 2,298 | 1,884 | |
| Non-cash flow items and divesting activities | –286 | –92 | |
| Interest received | 75 | 50 | |
| Interest paid | –271 | –193 | |
| Dividends received | 179 | 40 | |
| Other financial items and realised foreign exchange gains and losses | 7 | 14 | |
| Taxes | –383 | –374 | |
| Funds from operations | 1,619 | 1,329 | |
| Increase in interest-free receivables | –11 | –88 | |
| Increase/decrease in inventories | 40 | –51 | |
| Decrease/increase in interest-free liabilities | 22 | –39 | |
| Change in working capital | 51 | –178 | |
| Total net cash from operating activities | 1,670 | 1,151 | |
| Cash flow from investing activities | |||
| Capital expenditures 1) | 5, 21, 22 | –592 | –485 |
| Acquisition of subsidiaries, net of cash acquired | 8 | –10 | –754 |
| Acquisition of associates 2) | 23 | –271 | –124 |
| Acquisition of other long-term investments | –4 | –21 | |
| Proceeds from sales of fixed assets | 14 | 83 | |
| Proceeds from sales of subsidiaries, net of cash disposed | 8 | – | 11 |
| Proceeds from sales of associates | 23 | 304 | 30 |
| Proceeds from sales of other long-term investments | 29 | 1 | |
| Change in interest-bearing receivables | –79 | –47 | |
| Total net cash used in investing activities | –609 | –1,306 | |
| Cash flow before financing activities | 1,061 | –155 | |
| Cash flow from financing activities | |||
| Proceeds from long-term liabilities | 942 | 1,263 | |
| Payments of long-term liabilities | –417 | –803 | |
| Change in short-term liabilities | –37 | 32 | |
| Proceeds from stock options exercised | 29 | 17 | 49 |
| Dividends paid to the Company's equity holders | 19 | –1,122 | –987 |
| Repurchase of own shares | 29 | –175 | –30 |
| Other financing items | 1 | 0 | |
| Total net cash used in financing activities | –791 | –476 | |
| Total net increase (+)/decrease (–) in cash and cash equivalents | 270 | –631 | |
| Cash and cash equivalents at the beginning of the year | 157 | 788 | |
| Cash and cash equivalents at the end of the year | 28 | 427 | 157 |
1) Capital expenditures in cash-flow do not include not yet paid investments. Capitalised borrowing costs are included in interest costs paid.
2) Acquisition of associates includes share issues and other capital contributions.
Fortum Corporation (the Company) is a Finnish public limited liability company with domicile in Espoo, Finland. The Company is listed on OMX Nordic Exchange Helsinki.
Fortum Corporation and its subsidiaries (together the Fortum Group) is a leading energy company in the Nordic countries and other parts of the Baltic Rim. Fortum's activities cover the generation, distribution and the sale of electricity and heat, the operation and maintenance of power plants as well as energy-related services.
Fortum's competitiveness in the power and heat business is based on a pan-Nordic concept which is characterised by a high level of operational efficiency and a broad customer base.
These Financial Statements were approved by the Board on 30 January 2008.
The consolidated financial statements of Fortum Group are prepared in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) /International Accounting Standards (IAS) as adopted by the European Union.
The consolidated financial statements have been prepared under the historical cost convention except for the revaluation of certain financial instruments.
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with IFRS requires the use of certain critical accounting estimates. It also requires management to exercise its judgment in the process of applying the Group's accounting principles. The areas involving higher degree of judgment or complexity, or areas where assumptions and estimates are significant to the consolidated financial statements are disclosed in Note 2 Critical accounting estimates and judgments.
In the year ended at 31 December 2007 Fortum has adopted the following new and amended standard and interpretations to existing standards:
flows that otherwise would be required under the contract. The adoption of IFRIC 9 has not led to any changes in Fortum Group's accounting policies.
• IFRIC 10 Interim financial reporting and impairment (effective for annual periods beginning on or after 1 November 2006). IFRIC 10 requires that an impairment loss recognised in a previous interim period in respect of goodwill or an investment in either an equity instrument or a financial asset carried at cost must not be reversed at a subsequent balance sheet date. The interpretation had no impact on the financial position or performance of Fortum Group.
The following interpretations are not relevant to Fortum Group's operations:
Fortum Corporation Annual Report 2007 – Financials
1 (revised) will mainly change the presentation of the income statement and the statement of changes in equity. The revised standard has not yet been endorsed in the EU.
The following interpretations are not relevant to the Fortum Group's operations:
An asset or a liability is classified as a current asset or liability when it is held primarily for commercial purposes or is expected to be realised within twelve months after the balance sheet date. Cash and cash equivalents are classified as current assets.
All other assets and liabilities are classified as non-current assets and liabilities.
The consolidated financial statements include the parent company Fortum Corporation and all those companies in which Fortum Corporation has the power to govern the financial and operating policies and generally holds, directly or indirectly, more than 50% of the voting rights. The Fortum Group subsidiaries are disclosed in Note 46 Subsidiaries by segment on 31 December 2007.
Fortum Group was formed in 1998 by using the pooling-ofinterests method for consolidating Fortum Power and Heat Oy and Fortum Oil and Gas Oy (the latter demerged to Fortum Oil Oy and Fortum Heat and Gas Oy 1 May 2004. In 2005 Fortum Oil Oy was separated from Fortum by distributing 85% of its shares to Fortum's shareholders and by selling the remaining 15%.). This means that the acquisition cost of Fortum Power and Heat Oy and Fortum Heat and Gas Oy has been eliminated against the share capital of the companies. The difference has been entered as a decrease in shareholders' equity.
The financial statements of Fortum Group have been consolidated according to the purchase method. The cost of an acquisition is measured as the aggregate of fair value of the assets given and liabilities incurred or assumed at the date of exchange, plus costs directly attributable to the acquisition. Identifiable assets acquired and liabilities assumed in a business combination are measured initially at their fair values at the acquisition date, irrespective of the extent of any minority interest. The excess of the cost of acquisition over the fair value of the Group's share of the identifiable net assets acquired is recorded as goodwill. If the cost of acquisition is less than the fair value of the net assets of the subsidiary acquired, the difference is recognised directly in the income statement.
Subsidiaries are fully consolidated from the date on which control is transferred to the Group and are no longer consolidated from the date that control ceases.
Intercompany transactions, balances and unrealised gains on transactions between Group companies are eliminated. Unrealised losses are also eliminated unless the transaction provides evidence of an impairment of the asset transferred. Where necessary, subsidiaries' accounting policies have been changed to ensure consistency with the policies the Group has adopted.
Associated companies are entities over which the Group has significant influence but not control, generally accompanying a shareholding of between 20% and 50% of the voting rights. Joint ventures are entities over which the Group has contractually agreed to share the power to govern the financial and operating policies of that entity with another venturer or venturers. The Group's interests in associated companies and jointly controlled entities are accounted for by the equity method of accounting. Assets acquired and liabilities assumed in the investment in associates or joint ventures are measured initially at their fair values at the acquisition date. The excess of the cost of acquisition over the fair value of the Group's share of the identifiable net assets acquired is recorded as goodwill. If the cost of acquisition is less than the fair value of the net assets of the associate or joint venture acquired, the difference is recognised directly in the income statement.
The Group's share of its associates or joint ventures postacquisition profits or losses after tax and the expenses related to the adjustments to the fair values of the assets and liabilities assumed is recognised in the income statement. The cumulative post-acquisition movements are adjusted against the carrying amount of the investment. The Group's share of post-acquisition adjustments to associates or joint ventures equity that have not been recognised in the associates or joint ventures income statement, is recognised directly in Group's shareholder's equity and against the carrying amount of the investment.
When the Group's share of losses in an associate or a joint venture equals or exceeds its interest in the associate or joint venture, including any other unsecured receivables, the Group does not Fortum Corporation Annual Report 2007 – Financials
recognise further losses, unless it has incurred obligations or made payments on behalf of the associate or joint venture.
Unrealised gains on transactions between the Group and its associates or joint ventures are eliminated to the extent of the Group's interest in the associate or joint venture. Unrealised losses are also eliminated unless the transaction provides evidence of an impairment of the asset transferred. Accounting policies of associates or joint ventures have been changed where necessary to ensure consistency with the policies adopted by the Group. If the information is not available the share of the profit of certain associated or joint venture companies is included in the consolidated accounts based on the previous quarterly information.
Regarding accounting for Fortum's shareholding in Hafslund ASA and the Russian shareholdings, see Note 23 Investments in associated companies and joint ventures.
Fortum discloses primary segment information based on the organisational and business structure. A business segment is a group of assets and operations engaged in providing products or services that are subject to risks and returns that are different from those of other business segments. The Group's businesses are divided into the following primary reporting segments:
For further information about the reporting segments, see Note 5 Primary segment information. In Note 6 Geographical segments, Fortum also discloses some secondary segment information based on the geographical areas in which Fortum operates. The information disclosed is sales based on the country in which the customer is located, assets, capital expenditure and personnel based on where the assets and personnel are located.
Discontinued operations represent a separate major line of business that either have been disposed of or are classified as held for sale. Assets and liabilities attributable to the discontinued operations must be clearly distinguishable from the other consolidated entities in terms of their operations and cash flows. In addition, the reporting entity must not have any significant continuing involvement in the operations classified as a discontinued operation. The post-tax profit for the period attributable to discontinued operations including the gain or loss on the disposal is shown as a separate item in the Income Statement. The discontinued operations effect on cashflow is either separated in the Cash Flow Statement or disclosed in the notes.
Non-current assets (or disposal groups) classified as held for sale are valued at the lower of their carrying amount and fair value less costs to sell if their carrying amount will be recovered principally through a sale transaction rather than through continuing use. These classification criteria do not include non-current assets to be abandoned or those that have been temporarily taken out of use. An impairment loss (or subsequent gain) reduces (or increases) the carrying amount of the non-current assets or disposal groups. The assets are not depreciated or amortised. Interest or other expenses related to these assets are recognised as before the classification as held for sale.
Neste Oil was included in Fortum Group up until 31 March 2005, when the Annual General Meeting took the final decision to separate the oil operations by distributing approximately 85% of Neste Oil Corporation shares as dividend. The remaining approximately 15% of shares were sold to investors in April 2005. Oil operations have been presented as discontinued operations for 2004 and 2005, see Key financial figures pages 88–89.
Items included in the financial statements of each of the Group's entities are measured using the currency of the primary economic environment in which the entity operates ('the functional currency'). The consolidated financial statements are presented in euros, which is the Company's functional and presentation currency.
Transactions denominated in foreign currencies are translated using the exchange rate at the date of the transaction. Receivables and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies outstanding on the closing date are translated using the exchange rate quoted on the closing date. Exchange rate differences have been entered in the income statement. Net conversion differences relating to financing are entered under financial income or expenses, except when deferred in equity as qualifying cash flow hedges. Translation differences on available-for-sale financial assets are included in the fair value reserve in equity.
The income statements of subsidiaries, whose measurement and reporting currencies are not euros, are translated into the Group reporting currency using the average exchange rates for the year based on the month-end exchange rates, whereas the balance sheets of such subsidiaries are translated using the exchange rates on the balance sheet date. On consolidation, exchange differences arising from the translation of the net investment in foreign entities, and of borrowings and other currency instruments designated as hedges of such investments, are taken to equity. When a foreign operation is sold, such exchange differences are recognised in the income statement as part of the gain or loss on sale. Goodwill and fair value adjustments arising on the acquisition of a foreign entity are treated as assets and liabilities of the foreign entity and translated at the closing rate. The Group deems all cumulative translation differences for all foreign operations to be zero at the date of transition to IFRS, i.e. 1 January 2004.
Exchange rates used to translate reporting currencies into
euros in the Consolidated Financial Statement are disclosed in Note 9 Exchange rates.
Revenue comprises the fair value consideration received or receivable at the time of delivery of products and/or upon fulfillment of services. Revenue is shown, net of rebates, discounts, value-added tax and selective taxes such as electricity tax. Revenue is recognised as follows:
Sale of electricity, heat, cooling and distribution of electricity are recognised at the time of delivery. The sale to industrial and commercial customers and to end-customers is recognised based on the value of the volume supplied, including an estimated value of the volume supplied to customers between the date of their last meter reading and year end.
Physical energy sales and purchase contracts are accounted for on accrual basis as they are contracted with the Group's expected purchase, sale or usage requirements.
Electricity tax is levied on electricity delivered to retail customers by domestic utilities in Sweden. The tax is calculated on the basis of a fixed tax rate per kiloWatthour. The rate varies between different classes of customers. Sale of electricity in the income statement is shown net of electricity tax.
As from 1 January 2004 Fortum has replaced its physical electricity transactions between the segments with transactions against Nord Pool. The hourly sales and purchases with Nord Pool are netted on the Group level and posted either as revenue or cost, according to whether Fortum is a net seller or a net buyer during any particular hour.
The prices charged to customers for the sale of distribution of electricity are regulated. The regulatory mechanism differs from country to country. Any over or under income decided by the regulatory body is regarded as regulatory assets or liabilities that do not qualify for balance sheet recognition due to the fact that no contract defining the regulatory aspect has been entered into with a specific customer and thus the receivable is contingent on future delivery. The over or under income is normally credited or charged over a number of years in the future to the customer using the electricity connection at that time. No retroactive credit or charge can be made.
Fees paid by the customer when connected to the electricity, gas, heat or cooling network are recognised as income to the extent that the fee does not cover future commitments. If the connection fee is linked to the contractual agreement with the customer, the income is recognised over the period of the agreement with the customer. Fees paid by customers when connected to the electricity network before 2003 are refundable in Finland if the customer would ever disconnect the initial connection. Also fees paid by the customer when connected to district heating network in Finland are refundable. These connection fees have not been recognised in the income statement and are included in other liabilities in the balance sheet.
Contract revenue is recognised under the percentage of completion method to determine the appropriate amount to recognise as revenue and expenses in a given period. The stage of completion is measured by reference to the contract costs incurred up to the closing date as a percentage of total estimated costs for each contract. Costs incurred in the year in connection with future activity on a contract are excluded from contract costs in determining the stage of completion. They are presented as inventories, prepayments or other assets, depending on their nature.
The Group presents as an asset the amount due from customers for contract work for all contracts in progress for which costs incurred plus recognised profits (less recognised losses) exceeds progress billings. Progress billings not yet paid by customers and retention are included within 'trade and other receivables'. The Group presents as a liability the amount due to customers for contract work for all contracts in progress for which progress billings exceed costs incurred plus recognised profits (less recognised losses).
Revenue from activities outside normal operations is reported in Other income. This includes recurring items such as rental income and non-recurring items such as gains from sales of shares, property, plant and equipment, emission rights etc. Other income also includes the changes in the fair value of any derivative instruments that do not qualify for hedge accounting which are recognised immediately in the income statement.
Grants from the government are recognised at their fair value where there is a reasonable assurance that the grant will be received and the Group will comply with all attached conditions. Government grants relating to costs are deferred and recognised in the income statement over the period necessary to match them with the costs that they are intended to compensate. Government grants relating to the purchase of property, plant and equipment are deducted from the acquisition cost of the asset and are recognised as income by reducing the depreciation charge of the asset they relate to.
The Group accounts for emission allowances based on currently valid IFRS standards where purchased emission allowances are accounted for as intangible assets at cost, whereas emission allowances received free of charge are accounted for at nominal value. A provision is recognised to cover the obligation to return emission allowances. To the extent that Group already holds allowances to meet the obligation the provision is measured at the carrying amount of those allowances. Any shortfall of allowances held over the obligation is valued at the current market value of allowances. The cost of the provision is recognised in the income statement within materials and services. Gains from sales of emission rights are reported in other income.
Borrowing costs are recognised as an expense in the period in which they are incurred, except if they are directly attributable to the construction of an asset that meets the determined criteria. The determined criteria is as follows (a) the costs incurred for the construction of an investment exceed EUR 100 million (b) it will take more than 18 months to get the related asset(s) operational (c) it is an initial Greenfield investment.
Research and development costs are recognised as expense as incurred and included in other expenses in the Income statement. If development costs will generate future income, they are capitalised as intangible assets and depreciated over the period of the income streams.
Property, plant and equipment comprise mainly power and heat producing buildings and machinery, transmission lines, tunnels, waterfall rights and district heating network. Property, plant and equipment are stated at historical cost less accumulated depreciation and accumulated impairment losses as applicable in the consolidated balance sheet. Historical cost includes expenditure that is directly attributable to the acquisition of an item. Cost may also include transfers from equity of any gains or losses on qualifying cash flow hedges of foreign currency purchases of property, plant and equipment. Acquired assets on the acquisition of a new subsidiary are stated at their fair values at the date of acquisition.
Subsequent costs are included in the asset's carrying amount or recognised as a separate asset, as appropriate, only when it is probable that future economic benefits associated with the item will flow to the Group and the cost of the item can be measured reliably. All other repairs and maintenance are charged to the income statement during the financial period in which they are incurred.
Additionally the cost of an item of property, plant and equipment includes the estimated cost of its dismantlement, removal or restoration.
Land, water areas, waterfall rights and tunnels are not depreciated since they have indefinite useful lives. Depreciation on other assets is calculated using the straight-line method to allocate their cost to their residual values over their estimated useful lives, as follows:
| Hydro power plant buildings, | |
|---|---|
| structures and machinery | 40–50 years |
| Thermal power plant buildings, | |
| structures and machinery | 25 years |
| Nuclear power plant buildings, | |
| structures and machinery | 25 years |
| CHP power plant buildings, | |
| structures and machinery | 15–25 years |
| (each CHP plant has an individual depreciation period) | |
| Substation buildings, structures and machinery | 30–40 years |
| Distribution network | 15–40 years |
| District heating network | 30–40 years |
| Other buildings and structures | 20–40 years |
| Other tangible assets | 20–40 years |
| Other machinery and equipment | 3–20 years |
| Other long-term investments | 5–10 years |
The assets' residual values and useful lives are reviewed, and adjusted if appropriate, at each closing date. An asset's carrying amount is written down immediately to its recoverable amount if the asset's carrying amount is greater than its estimated recoverable amount.
Fortum owns, through its subsidiary Fortum Power and Heat Oy, the coal condensing power plant Meri-Pori in Finland, but Teollisuuden Voima Oy (TVO) has the contractual right to participate in the plant with 45.55%. The capacity and production can be divided between Fortum and TVO. Each owner can decide when and how much capacity to produce. Both Fortum and TVO purchase fuel and CO2 rights independently. Since both Fortum and TVO have control, including related risks and rewards, of their share of the power plant, Meri-Pori is accounted for as a jointly controlled asset.
Fortum is accounting for the part of the investment that corresponds to the investment Fortum has made, i.e. 55.55%. At present Fortum leases out its part of the Meri-Pori power plant. The lease agreement has been classified as an operating lease.
Fortum is also entitled to part of the electricity TVO produces in Meri-Pori through the shareholding of 26.58% of TVO C-series shares, see Note 23 Investments in associated companies and joint ventures.
Intangible assets, except goodwill, are stated at the historical cost less accumulated amortisation and impairment losses if applicable and amortised on a straight-line method over their expected useful lives.
Acquired computer software licences are capitalised on the basis of the costs incurred to the acquirer and bring to use the specific software. These costs are amortised over their estimated useful lives (three to five years). Costs associated with developing or maintaining computer software are recognised as an expense as incurred. Costs that are directly associated with the production of identifiable and unique software products controlled by the Group, and that will generate economic benefits exceeding costs beyond one year, are recognised as intangible assets. Direct costs include the software development employee costs and an appropriate portion of relevant overheads. Computer software development costs recognised as assets are amortised over their estimated useful lives (not exceeding three years).
Trademarks and licences are shown at historical cost less accumulated amortisation and impairment losses, as applicable. Amortisation is calculated using the straight-line method to allocate the cost of trademarks and licences over their estimated useful lives (15–20 years).
Costs in connection with acquisition of customer base are stated at its fair values at the date of the acquisition. Customer base means a portfolio of customers or a market share. Costs for customer base is amortised over their useful life, usually in five years. The customer base is also reviewed for impairment by assessing at each closing date whether there is any indication that the carrying amount may be impaired.
Goodwill represents the excess of the cost of an acquisition over the fair value of the Group's share of net identifiable assets of the acquired subsidiary/associate at the date of acquisition. Goodwill on acquisitions of subsidiaries is included in intangible assets. Goodwill on acquisition of associates is included in investments in associates and is tested for impairment as part of the overall balance. Separately recognised goodwill is tested annually for impairment and carried at cost less accumulated impairment losses. Impairment
losses on goodwill are not reversed. Gains and losses on disposal of an entity include the carrying amount of goodwill relating to the entity sold.
Goodwill is allocated to cash-generating units for the purpose of impairment testing. The allocation is made to those cash-generating units or groups of cash-generating units that are expected to benefit from the business combination in which the goodwill arose.
Assets that have an indefinite useful life are not subject to amortisation and are tested annually for impairment. Assets that are subject to amortisation are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount may not be recoverable. An impairment loss is recognised in the income statement for the amount by which the assets' carrying amount exceeds its recoverable amount. The recoverable amount is the higher of an asset's fair value less costs to sell and value in use. For the purpose of assessing impairment, assets are grouped at the lowest levels for which there are separately identifiable cash-flows (cash-generating units). Non-financial assets other than goodwill that suffered an impairment charge are reviewed for possible reversal of the impairment at each reporting date.
The Group classifies its investments in the following categories: financial assets at fair value through profit or loss, loans and receivables and available-for-sale financial assets. The classification depends on the purpose for which the investments were acquired. Management determines the classification of its financial assets at initial recognition and re-evaluates this designation at every reporting date.
A financial asset is classified in this category if acquired principally for the purpose of selling in the short term. Derivatives are also categorised as held for trading unless they are designated as hedges. Assets in this category are classified as current assets if they are either held for trading or are expected to be realised within 12 months of the closing date.
Loans and receivables are non-derivative financial assets with fixed or determinable payments that are not quoted in an active market. They arise when the Group provides money, goods or services directly to a debtor. They are included in non-current assets, except for maturities under 12 months after the closing date. These are classified as current assets.
Available-for-sale financial assets are non-derivatives that are either designated in this category or not classified in any of the other categories. They are included in non-current assets unless there is an intention to dispose of the investment within 12 months of the closing date.
Purchases and sales of investments are recognised on the trade-date – the date on which the Group commits to purchase or sell the asset. Investments are initially recognised at fair value plus transaction costs for all financial assets not carried at fair value through profit or loss. Investments are derecognised when the rights to receive cash flows from the investments have expired or have been transferred and the Group has transferred substantially all risks and rewards of ownership. Available-for-sale financial assets and financial assets at fair value through profit or loss are subsequently carried at fair value. Loans are carried at amortised cost using the effective interest method. Gains and losses arising from changes in the fair value of the "financial assets at fair value through profit or loss" category are included in the income statement in the period in which they arise. Gains and losses arising from changes in the fair value of securities classified as available-for-sale are recognised in equity. When securities classified as available-forsale are sold or impaired, the accumulated fair value adjustments are included in the income statement.
The fair values of quoted investments are based on current bid prices. If the market for a financial asset is not active (and for unlisted securities), the Group establishes fair value by using valuation techniques. These include the use of recent arm's length transactions, reference to other instruments that are substantially the same, discounted cash flow analysis, and option pricing models refined to reflect the issuer's specific circumstances.
The Group assesses at each closing date whether there is objective evidence that a financial asset or a group of financial assets is impaired. If any such evidence exists for available-for-sale financial assets, the cumulative loss – measured as the difference between the acquisition cost and the current fair value, less any impairment loss on that financial asset previously recognised in profit or loss – is removed from equity and recognised in the income statement.
Trade receivables are recorded at their fair value. A provision for impairment of trade receivables is established when there is evidence that the Group will not be able to collect all amounts due according to the original terms of the receivable. Significant financial difficulties of the debtor, probability that the debtor will enter into bankruptcy or financial reorganisation, and default or delinquency in payments are considered as indicators that the receivable is impaired. The amount of the impairment charge is measured as the difference between the asset's carrying amount and the present value of estimated future cash flows.
Trade receivables include revenue based on an estimate of electricity, heat, cooling and distribution of electricity already delivered but not yet measured and not yet invoiced.
Cash and cash equivalents include cash in hand, deposits held at call with banks and other short-term, highly liquid investments with original maturities of three months or less. Bank overdrafts are shown within borrowings in current liabilities in the balance sheet.
Where any group company purchases the Company's shares (treasury shares), the consideration paid, including any directly attributable incremental costs (net of income taxes), is deducted from equity attributable to the Company's equity holders. When such shares are subsequently sold or reissued, any consideration received is included in equity.
Borrowings are recognised initially at fair value less transaction costs incurred. In subsequent periods, they are stated at amortised cost; any difference between proceeds (net of transaction costs) and the redemption value is recognised as interest cost over the period
Fortum Corporation Annual Report 2007 – Financials
of the borrowing using the effective interest method. Borrowings or portion of borrowings being hedged item of a fair value hedge is recognised at fair value.
Leases of property, plant and equipment, where the Group has substantially all the risks and rewards of ownership, are classified as finance leases. Finance leases are capitalised at the commencement of the lease term at the lower of the fair value of the leased property and the present value of the minimum lease payments each determined at the inception of the lease. Each lease payment is allocated between the reduction of the outstanding liability and the finance charges. The corresponding rental obligations, net of finance charges, are included in the long-term or short-term interest-bearing liabilities according to their maturities. The interest element of the finance cost is charged to the income statement over the lease term so as to produce a constant periodic rate of interest on the remaining balance of the liability for each period. The property, plant and equipment acquired under finance leases are depreciated over the shorter of the useful life of the asset or the lease term.
Sale and leaseback transactions resulting in a finance lease agreement are recognised according to the principles described above. The difference between the selling price and the carrying amount of the asset sold is deferred and amortised over the lease period.
The property, plant and equipment leased out under a finance lease are presented as interest-bearing receivables at an amount equal to the net investment in the lease. Each lease payment receivable is allocated between the repayment of the principal and the finance income. Finance income is recognised in the income statement over the lease term so as to produce a constant periodic rate of return on the remaining balance of the receivable for each period.
Leases of property, plant and equipment, where the Group does not have substantially all of the risks and rewards of ownership are classified as operating leases. Payments made under operating leases are recognised in the income statement as costs on a straight-line basis over the lease term.
Payments received under operating leases where the Group leases out fixed assets are recognised as Other income in the income statement. Fortum has leased out its share of the coal condensing power plant Meri-Pori in Finland until June 2010. (See also Jointly controlled assets above.) The lease agreement has been classified as an operating lease.
Inventories are stated at the lower of cost and net realisable value. Cost is determined using the first-in, first-out (FIFO) method. The cost of finished goods and work in progress comprises raw materials, direct labour, other direct costs and related fixed production overheads (based on normal operating capacity). Net realisable value is the estimated selling price in the ordinary course of business, less applicable variable selling expenses.
Deferred tax is provided in full, using the liability method, on tempo-
rary differences arising between the tax bases of assets and liabilities and their carrying amounts in the consolidated financial statements. However, if the deferred tax arises from initial recognition of an asset or liability in a transaction other than a business combination that at the time of the transaction affects neither accounting nor taxable profit or loss, it is not accounted for. Deferred tax is determined using tax rates (and laws) that have been enacted or substantially enacted by the closing date and are expected to apply when the related deferred tax asset is realised or the deferred tax liability is settled.
Deferred tax assets are recognised to the extent that it is probable that future taxable profit will be available against which the temporary differences can be utilised. Deferred tax assets are set off against deferred tax liabilities if they relate to income taxes levied by the same taxation authority.
Deferred tax is provided on temporary differences arising from investments in subsidiaries, associates and joint ventures, except where the timing of the reversal of the temporary difference is controlled by the Group, and it is probable that the temporary difference will not reverse in the foreseeable future.
The Group companies have various pension schemes in accordance with the local conditions and practises in the countries in which they operate. The schemes are generally funded through payments to insurance companies or Groups pension fund as determined by periodic actuarial calculations. The Group has both defined benefit and defined contribution plans.
The Group's contributions to defined contribution plans are charged to the income statement in the period to which the contributions relate.
For defined benefit plans, pension costs are assessed using the projected unit credit method. The cost of providing pensions is charged to the income statement as to spread the service cost over the service lives of employees. The defined benefit obligation is measured as the present value of the estimated future cash flows using interest rates of high-quality corporate bonds that have terms to maturity approximating to the terms of the related pension liability. The liability recognised in the balance sheet is the defined benefit obligation at the closing date less the fair value of plan assets with adjustments for unrecognized actuarial gains or losses. Prepaid contributions are recognised as an asset to the extent that a cash refund or a reduction in the future payments is available.
Actuarial gains and losses exceeding 10% of total of the present value of defined benefit obligations or the fair value of plan assets (whichever is higher) are recorded in the income statement over the employees' expected average remaining working lives. Past-service costs are recognised immediately in income statement. The related interest cost is included in the employee benefit expense.
The Group operates long-term management performance share arrangements. The potential reward of the performance share arrangement is based on the performance of the Group, its business units and the individual participant as well as appreciation of the Fortum share. The potential reward of the performance share arrangement is treated as cash settled arrangement which is recognised as an expense during the vesting period with a corresponding increase in the liabilities. The fair value of the potential reward is measured based on the market value of Fortum share at each closing date and at the grant date. Estimated departures are taken into account when determining the fair value of the potential reward. The changes of the fair value of the potential reward are accrued over the remaining vesting period. A provision is recorded on the social charges related to the arrangement payable by the employer.
In order to hedge the Group against the changes in the fair values of the potential rewards the Group has entered into share forward transactions which are settled in cash. The forward transactions do not qualify for hedge accounting and therefore the periodic changes to their fair values are recorded in the income statement.
Stock options are measured at fair value at the time they were granted and they are expensed on a straight-line basis in the income statement over the period from the date they were granted to commencement of the right to exercise them. The expense determined at the moment of granting the options is based on an estimate of the number of options that will vest at the time of commencement of the right to exercise them. The fair value of the options is determined on the basis of the Black-Scholes or Binomial pricing model. Estimates of the final amount of options are updated on each closing date if applicable and the effects of changes in estimates are recorded in the income statement. Social charges related to the options payable by the employer are entered as an expense to the income statement and as a provision in the balance sheet in the accounting period during which the options are granted. This provision is measured based on the fair value of the options, and the amount of the provision is adjusted to reflect the changes in the Fortum share price. When stock options are exercised, the cash payments received on the basis of the share subscriptions (adjusted for any transaction expenses) are recognised in equity.
Provisions for environmental restorations, asset retirement obligations, restructuring costs and legal claims are recognised when the Group has a present legal or constructive obligation as a result of past events to a third party, it is probable that an outflow of resources will be required to settle the obligation and the amount can be reliably estimated.
Provisions are measured at the present value of the expenditures expected to be required to settle the obligation using a pre-tax rate that reflects current market assessments of the time value of money and the risks specific to the obligation. The increase in the provision due to the passage of time is recognised as interest expense.
Environmental provisions are recognised, based on current interpretation of environmental laws and regulations, when it is probable that a present obligation has arisen and the amount of such liability can be reliably estimated. Environmental expenditures resulting from the remediation of an existing condition caused by past operations, and which do contribute to current or future revenues, are expensed as incurred.
Asset retirement obligation is recognised either, when there is a contractual obligation towards a third party or a legal obligation and the obligation amount and the definite lifetime can be estimated
reliably. Obligating event is e.g. when a plant is built on a leased land with an obligation to dismantle and remove the asset in the future or when a legal obligation towards Fortum changes. The asset retirement obligation is recognised as part of the cost of an item of property and plant when the asset is put in service or when contamination occurs. The costs will be depreciated over the remainder of the assets' useful life.
Restructuring provisions comprise mainly of employee termination payments.
Fortum owns Loviisa nuclear power plant in Finland. Fortum's part of the State Nuclear Waste Management Fund and the related nuclear provisions are both presented separately in the balance sheet. Fortum's share in the State Nuclear Waste Management Fund is accounted for according to IFRIC 5, Rights to interests arising from decommissioning, restoration and environmental rehabilitation funds which states that the fund assets are measured at the lower of fair value or the value of the related liabilities since Fortum does not have control or joint control over the State Nuclear Waste Management Fund. The related provisions are the provision for decommissioning and the provision for disposal of spent fuel.
The fair values of the provisions are calculated by discounting the separate future cash flows, which are based on estimated future costs and actions already taken. The initial net present value of the provision for decommissioning (at the time of commissioning the nuclear power plant) has been included in the investment cost and is depreciated over the estimated operating time of the nuclear power plant. Changes in the technical plans etc, which have an impact on the future cash-flow of the estimated costs for decommissioning, are accounted for by discounting the additional costs to the current point in time. The increased asset retirement cost due to the increased provision is added to property, plant and equipment and depreciated over the remaining estimated operating time of the nuclear power plant.
The provision for spent fuel covers the future disposal costs for fuel used until the end of the accounting period. Costs for disposal of spent fuel are expensed during the operating time based on fuel usage. The impact of the possible changes in the estimated future cash-flow for related costs is recognised immediately in the income statement based on the accumulated amount of fuel used until the end of the accounting period. The related interest costs due to unwinding of the provision, for the period during which the spent fuel provision has been accumulated and present point in time, are also recognised immediately in the income statement.
The timing factor is taken into account by recognising the interest expense related to discounting the nuclear provisions. The interest on the State Nuclear Waste Management Fund assets is presented as financial income.
Fortum's actual share of the State Nuclear Waste Management Fund, related to Loviisa nuclear power plant, is higher than the carrying value of the Fund in the balance sheet. The legal nuclear liability should, according to the Finnish Nuclear Energy Act, be fully covered by payments and guarantees to the State Nuclear Waste Management Fund. The legal liability is not discounted while the provisions are, and since the future cash-flow is spread over 100 years, the difference between the legal liability and the provisions are material.
The annual fee to the Fund is based on changes in the legal liability, the interest income generated in the State Nuclear Waste Management Fund and incurred costs of taken actions.
Fortum also has minority shareholdings in the associated nuclear power production companies Teollisuuden Voima Oy (TVO) in Finland and directly and indirectly OKG AB and Forsmarks Kraftgrupp AB in Sweden. Similar kinds of adjustments are made through accounting of associates.
For more information regarding nuclear related assets and liabilities, see Note 37 Nuclear related assets and liabilities.
A contingent liability is disclosed when there is a possible obligation that arises from events and whose existence is only confirmed by one or more doubtful future events or when there is an obligation that is not recognised as a liability or provision because it is not likely that on outflow of resources will be required.
Basic earnings per share is calculated by dividing the net profit attributable to shareholders by the weighted average number of ordinary shares in issue during the year, excluding ordinary shares purchased by the Group and held as treasury shares.
Diluted earnings per share is calculated adjusting the weighted average number of ordinary shares outstanding to assume conversion of all dilutive potential ordinary shares. For the warrants and stock options a calculation is done to determine the number of shares that could have been acquired at fair value (determined as the average annual market share price of the Fortum share) based on the monetary value of the subscription rights attached to outstanding stock options.
The number of shares calculated as above is deducted from the number of shares that would have been issued assuming the exercise of the stock options. The incremental shares obtained through the assumed exercise of the options and warrants are added to the weighted average number of shares outstanding.
Options and warrants have a dilutive effect only when the average market price of ordinary shares during the period exceeds the exercise price of the options or warrants. Previously reported earnings per share are not retroactively adjusted to reflect changes in price of ordinary shares.
Dividends proposed by the Board of Directors are not recognised in the financial statements until they have been approved by the Company's shareholders at the Annual General Meeting.
Within the ordinary course of business the Group routinely enters into sale and purchase transactions for commodities. The majority of these transactions take the form of contracts that were entered into and continue to be held for the purpose of receipt or delivery of the commodity in accordance with the Group's expected sale, purchase or usage requirements. Such contracts are not within the scope of IAS 39. All other net-settled commodity contracts are measured at fair value with gains and losses taken to the income statement.
Derivatives are initially recognised at fair value on the date a derivative contract is entered into and are subsequently re-measured at their fair value. The method of recognising the resulting gain or loss depends on whether the derivative is designated as a hedging instrument, and if so, the nature of the item being hedged. The Group designates certain derivatives as either: (1) hedges of highly probable forecast transactions (cash flow hedges); (2) hedges of the fair value of recognised assets or liabilities or a firm commitment (fair value hedge); or (3) hedges of net investments in foreign operations. The Group documents at the inception of the transaction the relationship between hedging instruments and hedged items, as well as its risk management objective and strategy for undertaking various hedge transactions. The Group also documents its assessment, both at hedge inception and on an ongoing basis, of whether the derivatives that are used in hedging transactions are highly effective in offsetting changes in fair values or cash flows of hedged items. Derivatives are divided into non-current and current based on maturity. Only for those electricity derivatives, which have cash flows in different years, the fair values are split between noncurrent and current assets or liabilities.
The effective portion of changes in the fair value of derivatives that are designated and qualify as cash flow hedges are recognised in equity. The gain or loss relating to the ineffective portion is recognised immediately in the income statement. Amounts accumulated in equity are recycled in the income statement in the periods when the hedged item will affect profit or loss (for instance when the forecast sale that is hedged takes place). However, when the forecast transaction that is hedged results in the recognition of a non-financial asset (for example, inventory) or a liability, the gains and losses previously deferred in equity are transferred from equity and included in the initial measurement of the cost of the asset or liability. When a hedge no longer meets the criteria for hedge accounting, any cumulative gain or loss existing in equity is recognised in the income statement when the forecast transaction is ultimately also recognised in the income statement. When a forecast transaction is no longer expected to occur, the cumulative gain or loss that was reported in equity is immediately recognised in the income statement.
Changes in the fair value of derivatives that are designated and qualify as fair value hedges are recorded in the income statement, together with any changes in the fair value of the hedged asset or liability that are attributable to the hedged risk.
If the hedge no longer meets the criteria for hedge accounting, the adjustment to the carrying amount of a hedged item for which the effective interest method is used is amortised to profit or loss for the period to maturity.
Hedges of net investments in foreign operations are accounted for similarly to cash flow hedges. Any gain or loss on the hedging instrument relating to the effective portion of the hedge is recognised in equity; the gain or loss relating to the ineffective portion is recognised immediately in the income statement. Gains and losses accumulated in equity are included in the income statement when the foreign operation is disposed of.
Certain derivative instruments do not qualify for hedge accounting. Changes in the fair value of any derivative instruments that do not qualify for hedge accounting are recognised immediately in other income in the income statement.
The fair value of financial instruments including electricity derivatives traded in active markets (such as publicly traded derivatives, and trading and available-for-sale securities) is based on quoted market prices at the closing date. The fair value of financial instruments that are not traded in an active market is determined by using valuation techniques. The Group uses a variety of methods and makes assumptions that are based on market conditions existing at each closing date.
Fair valuation of electricity derivatives maturing over six years and which are not standard Nord Pool products are based on prices collected from reliable market participants. Other techniques, such as estimated discounted cash flows, are used to determine fair value for the remaining financial instruments. The fair value of interest-rate swaps is calculated as the present value of the estimated
future cash flows. The fair value of forward foreign exchange contracts is determined using forward exchange market rates at the closing date. Fair values of options are determined by using option valuation models. The fair value of financial liabilities is estimated by discounting the future contractual cash flows at the current market interest rate that is available to the Group for similar financial instruments. Changes in assumptions about these factors will affect the reported fair value of financial instruments.
In fair valuation, credit spread has not been adjusted, because major part of the derivatives contracts is done with or through Nord Pool and financial institutions with investment grade ratings.
The nominal value less estimated credit adjustments of trade receivables and payables are assumed to approximate their fair values.
The preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the dates of the consolidated financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Estimates and judgments are continually evaluated and are based on historical experience and other factors, including expectations of future events that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances. Actual results may differ from these estimates. The company's critical accounting estimates and judgments are described below.
The Group has significant carrying values in property, plant and equipment which are tested for impairment according to the accounting policy stated in Note 1 Accounting policies. The recoverable amounts of cash-generating units have been determined based on value-in-use calculations. These calculations require the use of estimates of future cash-flows.
The Group has not recognised any impairment losses during 2007 based on these calculations.
If the revised estimated operating profit before depreciation at 31 December 2007 was 10% lower than management's estimates at 31 December 2007 or pre-tax discount rate applied to the discounted cash flows was 10% higher than management's estimates, the Group would not have recognised impairment against property plant and equipment.
Fortum has deferred tax assets and liabilities which are expected to be realised through the income statement over the extended periods of time in the future. In calculating the deferred tax items, Fortum is required to make certain assumptions and estimates regarding the future tax consequences attributable to differences between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities as recorded in the financial statements and their tax basis.
Assumptions made include the expectation that future operating performance for subsidiaries will be consistent with historical
levels of operating results, recoverability periods for tax loss carryforwards will not change, undistributed earnings of foreign investments have been permanently invested and that existing tax laws and rates will remain unchanged into foreseeable future. Fortum believes that it has prudent assumptions in developing its deferred tax balances.
The Group recognises liabilities for anticipated tax audit issues based on estimates of whether additional taxes will be due. Where the final outcome of these matters is different from the amounts that were initially recorded, such differences will impact the income tax and deferred tax provisions in the period in which such determination is made.
Were the actual final outcome (regarding tax audits) to differ negatively from management's estimates with 10%, the Group would need to increase the income tax liability by EUR 1 million.
The provision for future obligations for nuclear waste management including decommissioning of Fortum's nuclear power plant and related spent fuel is based on long-term cash-flow forecasts of estimated future costs. The main assumptions are technical plans, timing, costs estimates and discount rate. The technical plans, timing and cost estimates are approved by governmental authorities.
Any changes in the assumed discount rate would affect the provision. If the discount rate used would be lowered, the provision would increase. Fortum has contributed cash to the State Nuclear Waste Management Fund based on a non-discounted legal liability, which leads to that the increase in provision would be offset by an increase in the recorded share of Fortum's part of the State Nuclear Waste Management Fund in the balance sheet. The total effect on the income statement would be positive since the decommissioning part of the provision is treated as an asset retirement obligation. This situation will prevail as long as the legal obligation to contribute cash to the State Nuclear Waste Management Fund is based on a non-discounted liability and IFRS is limiting the carrying value of the assets to the amount of the provision since Fortum does not have control or joint control over the fund. (See Note 37 Nuclear related assets and liabilities)
Risk management objectives, principles, and framework including governance, organisation and processes as well as description of risks i.e. strategic, financial and operational risks are described in Operating and Financial Review (OFR).
Fortum defines financial risk as the negative effects of market price movements, volume changes, liquidity events or counterpart events. A number of different methods, such as Value-at-Risk and Profit-at-Risk, are used throughout the Group to quantify financial risks. In particular, the potential impact of price and volume risks of electricity, weather, CO2 and main fuels are assessed taking into account their interdependencies. Stress-testing is carried out in order to assess the effects of extreme electricity price movements on Fortum's earnings.
Financial risk taking in business units aims to capture potential upside by optimising hedging or by trading in the markets. Risk taking is limited by risk mandates. Risk mandates include minimum EBIT levels for the business units that are set by The President and CEO. Volumetric limits, Value-at-Risk limits, Stop-Loss limits and counterpart exposure limits are also in place.
Fortum hedges its electricity price risks by entering into electricity forwards and futures contracts. The Fortum Management Team steers the hedging activities through hedging strategies that are executed by the business units within set mandates. The strategies and their execution are continuously evaluated.
Fortum's sensitivity to electricity market price is dependent on the hedge level for a given time period. The hedge ratio on 31 December 2007 was approximately 70% for the year 2008 and 25% for 2009. Assuming no changes in generation volumes, hedge ratios or cost structure a 1 EUR/ MWh change in the market price of electricity would affect Fortum's 2008 profit before income tax by approximately EUR 14 million and 2009 EUR 37 million. Volume used in this sensitivity analysis is 50 TWh which includes the electricity generation sold to spot market in Power Generation and Heat segments without minority owner's shares of electricity or other pass-through sales. This volume is heavily dependent on price level, hydrological situation, length of annual maintenance periods and
availability of power plants. Sensitivity is calculated only for market price movement as hydrological conditions, temperature, CO2 allowance prices, fuel prices and the import/export situation all affects electricity price on short-term basis and effect of these factors cannot be separated as individual sensitivity analysis.
Sensitivity analysis shows the sensitivity arising from financial electricity derivatives as defined in IFRS 7. These derivatives are used in hedging and proprietary trading purposes in various Business Units within Fortum. Sensitivities are calculated based on 31 December 2007 (31 December 2006) position. Positions are actively managed in the day-to-day business operations and therefore the sensitivities vary from time to time. Sensitivity analysis includes only the market risks arising from derivatives i.e. the underlying physical electricity sales and purchase is not included. Sensitivity is calculated with the assumption that electricity forward quotations in Nord Pool and in EEX would change 1 EUR/MWh for the period Fortum has derivatives.
| +/– 1 EUR/MWh change in electricity forward quotations, EUR million |
Effect | 2007 | 2006 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Effect on Profit before income tax | –/+ | 2 | –4 |
| Effect on Equity | –/+ | 29 | 36 |
The tables below disclose the Group's electricity derivatives used mainly for hedging electricity price risk. The fair values represent the values disclosed in the balance sheet. See also Note 1 Accounting policies for accounting principles and bases for fair value estimations and Note 7 Fair value changes of derivatives and underlying items in income statement for the effects in the income statement regarding electricity derivatives not getting hedge accounting status.
| 31 December 2007 | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross | Volume, TWh | Fair value, EUR million | |||||
| Under | 1–5 | Over | Total | Positive | Negative | Net | |
| 1 year | years | 5 years | |||||
| Sales swaps | 92 | 26 | 1 | 119 | 65 | 716 | –651 |
| Purchase swaps | 71 | 17 | 0 | 88 | 526 | 64 | 462 |
| Purchased options | – | – | – | – | – | – | – |
| Written options | 2 | – | – | 2 | 1 | 2 | –1 |
| Total | 165 | 43 | 1 | 209 | 592 | 782 | –190 |
| Netting against Nord Pool 1) | |||||||
| Total | –473 | –473 | 0 | ||||
| Balance | 119 | 309 | –190 |
1) Receivables and liabilities against Nord Pool arising from standard derivative contracts with same delivery period are netted.
| 31 December 2007 | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross | Volume, TWh | Fair value, EUR million | |||||
| Under | 1–5 | Over | Total | Positive | Negative | Net | |
| 1 year | years | 5 years | |||||
| Derivatives with hedge accounting status | 65 | 25 | 0 | 90 | 211 | 383 | –172 |
| Derivatives with non-hedge accounting status 1) | 100 | 18 | 1 | 119 | 381 | 399 | –18 |
| Total | 165 | 43 | 1 | 209 | 592 | 782 | –190 |
| Netting against Nord Pool 2) | |||||||
| Derivatives with hedge accounting status | –198 | –198 | 0 | ||||
| Derivatives with non-hedge accounting status 1) | –275 | –275 | 0 | ||||
| Total | –473 | –473 | 0 | ||||
| Balance | 119 | 309 | –190 | ||||
| Of which long-term | 56 | 88 | –32 | ||||
| Short-term | 63 | 221 | –158 |
| 31 December 2006 | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross | Volume, TWh | Fair value, EUR million | ||||||
| Under | 1–5 | Over | Total | Positive | Negative | Net | ||
| 1 year | years | 5 years | ||||||
| Sales swaps | 98 | 35 | 1 | 134 | 773 | 258 | 515 | |
| Purchase swaps | 80 | 20 | 1 | 101 | 208 | 634 | –426 | |
| Purchased options | 0 | – | – | 0 | – | 0 | 0 | |
| Written options | 3 | – | – | 3 | 3 | 0 | 3 | |
| Total | 181 | 55 | 2 | 238 | 984 | 892 | 92 | |
| Netting against Nord Pool 2) | ||||||||
| Total | –745 | –745 | 0 | |||||
| Balance | 239 | 147 | 92 |
| 31 December 2006 | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross | Volume, TWh | Fair value, EUR million | ||||||
| Under | 1–5 | Over | Total | Positive | Negative | Net | ||
| 1 year | years | 5 years | ||||||
| Derivatives with hedge accounting status | 70 | 35 | 1 | 106 | 398 | 334 | 64 | |
| Derivatives with non-hedge accounting status 1) | 111 | 20 | 1 | 132 | 586 | 558 | 28 | |
| Total | 181 | 55 | 2 | 238 | 984 | 892 | 92 | |
| Netting against Nord Pool 2) | ||||||||
| Derivatives with hedge accounting status | –284 | –284 | 0 | |||||
| Derivatives with non-hedge accounting status 1) | –461 | –461 | 0 | |||||
| Total | –745 | –745 | 0 | |||||
| Balance | 239 | 147 | 92 | |||||
| Of which long-term | 63 | 70 | –7 | |||||
| Short-term | 176 | 77 | 99 |
1) Derivatives with non-hedge accounting status consist of trading derivatives and cash flow hedges without hedge accounting status.
2) Receivables and liabilities against Nord Pool arising from standard derivative contracts with same delivery period are netted.
Power and heat generation, customer sales, and electricity distribution volumes have significant variations that depend on the nature of the business. These volumes are subject to changes in, for example, hydrological conditions and temperature.
Changes in volumes are closely monitored so that hedges can be adjusted accordingly. In addition, volume risks in power and heat generation are partly mitigated through generation flexibility.
Fortum uses some financial derivatives such as oil and coal derivatives to mitigate its fuel price risk. At 31 December 2007 Fortum had oil sales swaps and futures 460 thousand bbl (2006: 180 thousand) and oil purchase swaps and futures 795 thousand bbl (2006: 897 thousand). The respective net fair values were EUR –4 million
(2006: 0 million) and EUR 9 million (2006: 0 million). Volumes of sold and bought coal derivatives were 150 kt and 375 kt respectively and the net fair values were EUR –1 million and EUR 1 million.
Fortum manages its exposure to CO2 allowance prices related to own production through the use of CO2 forwards and by ensuring that the costs of allowances are taken into account during production planning. These are own use contracts valued at cost.
In addition to own production Fortum has proprietary trading book. These allowances are treated as derivatives in the accounts. At 31 December 2007 the trading volumes of sold and bought CO2 emission allowances were 3,101 ktCO2 (2006: 405) and 3,121 ktCO2 (2006: 418). The respective net fair values were EUR –13 million (2006:0) and EUR 13 million (2006:0).
Amounts disclosed below are non-discounted cash flows for electricity derivatives.
| 31 December 2007 | 31 December 2006 | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Under | 1–5 | Over | Total | Under | 1–5 | Over | Total | |
| EUR million | 1 year | years | 5 years | 1 year | years | 5 years | ||
| Electricity derivatives liabilities | 642 | 166 | 9 | 817 | 768 | 140 | 3 | 911 |
| Electricity derivatives assets | 466 | 133 | 6 | 605 | 908 | 88 | 4 | 1,000 |
Fortum is trading electricity forwards, futures, options, and CfD's (contract for differences) mainly on the Nord Pool market and CO2 allowances on the European market.
Strict management controls are set to limit trading losses. Stop loss mandates are set to limit the cumulative maximum loss in millions of euros during the year. In addition, "red-flag" thresholds are established at predefined levels before reaching the stop loss limit. Value-at-Risk mandates are set to limit the maximum risk taking during one day. Specific decision making and reporting procedures are set up to limit potential losses and ensure compliance with predefined risk mandates.
Fortum's business is capital intensive and the Group has a regular need to raise financing. Fortum has a diversified loan portfolio mainly consisting of long-term bond financing but also a variety of other long- and short-term financing facilities. On 31 December 2007, the total interest bearing debt was EUR 4,893 million (2006:
4,502 million) and the interest-bearing net debt was EUR 4,466 million (2006: 4,345 million).
Fortum manages liquidity and refinancing risks through a combination of cash positions and committed credit facility agreements with its core banks. The Group shall at all times have access to cash/marketable securities and unused committed credit facilities including overdrafts, to cover all loans maturing within the next twelve-month period. Cash/marketable securities and unused committed credit facilities shall always amount to at least EUR 500 million. Short-term financing (with a tenor less than one year) shall not account for more than EUR 1,200 million.
On 31 December 2007, loan maturities for the coming twelvemonth period amounted to EUR 605 million (2006: 442 million), cash and marketable securities amounted to EUR 427 million (2006: 157 million), and the amount of undrawn committed credit facilities was EUR 1,416 million (2006: 1,314 million). On top of the committed credit facilities, Fortum had at year end access to approximately EUR 2.7 billion (2006: 2.2 billion) of uncommitted credit facilities.
| EUR million | 2007 |
|---|---|
| 2008 | 605 |
| 2009 | 304 |
| 2010 | 548 |
| 2011 | 293 |
| 2012 | 509 |
| 2013 and later | 2,634 |
| Total | 4,893 |
| Total facility | Drawn amount | Available | |
|---|---|---|---|
| EUR million | amount | ||
| Cash and Marketable securities | 427 | ||
| Committed credit lines | |||
| EUR 1,200 million syndicated credit facility | 1,200 | – | 1,200 |
| Bilateral overdraft facilities | 216 | – | 216 |
| Total committed credit lines | 1,416 | – | 1,416 |
| Debt programmes (uncommitted) | |||
| Fortum Corporation, CP programme EUR 500 million | 500 | – | 500 |
| Fortum Corporation, CP programme SEK 5,000 million | 530 | – | 530 |
| Fortum Corporation, EMTN programme EUR 5,000 million | 5,000 | 3,361 | 1,639 |
| Total debt programmes | 6,030 | 3,361 | 2,669 |
| Total facility | Drawn amount | Available amount |
|---|---|---|
| 157 | ||
| 1,200 | – | 1,200 |
| 116 | 2 | 114 |
| 1,316 | 2 | 1,314 |
| 500 | – | 500 |
| 553 | 55 | 498 |
| 4,000 | 2,785 | 1,215 |
| 5,053 | 2,840 | 2,213 |
Amounts disclosed below are non-discounted cash flows of interestbearing liabilities and interest rate and currency derivatives, and the expected cash-flows arising (future interest payments and amortisations) from these items.
| 31 December 2007 | 31 December 2006 | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EUR million | Under 1 year |
1–5 years |
Over 5 years |
Total | Under 1 year |
1–5 years |
Over 5 years |
Total |
| Interest-bearing liabilities 1) | 838 | 2,344 | 3,149 | 6,331 | 620 | 2,355 | 2,880 | 5,855 |
| Interest rate and currency derivatives liabilities | 4,895 | 3,570 | 136 | 8,601 | 6,348 | 2,144 | 147 | 8,639 |
| Interest rate and currency derivatives receivables | –4,924 | –3,608 | –133 | –8,665 | –6,271 | –2,088 | –156 | –8,515 |
| Total | 809 | 2,306 | 3,152 | 6,267 | 697 | 2,411 | 2,871 | 5,979 |
1) Loans from State Nuclear Waste Fund and Teollisuuden Voima Oy are yearly renewed. Interest payments of these loans are calculated for ten years.
The Treasury risk policy stipulates that the average duration of the debt portfolio shall always be kept within a range of 12 and 24 months, and that changes in interest rates shall not affect the net interest payments of the Group by more than EUR 40 million for the next rolling 12-month period. Within these mandates, strategies are evaluated and developed in order to find an optimal balance between risk and financing cost.
On 31 December 2007 the average duration of the debt port-
folio (including derivatives) was 1.3 years (2006: 1.5 years). Approximately 67% (2006: 66%) of the debt portfolio was on a floating rate basis or will be refinanced during the coming 12 months. The effect of one percentage point change in interest rates on the present value of the debt portfolio was EUR 71 million on 31 December 2007 (2006: 56 million). The flow risk, measured as the difference between the base case net interest cost estimate and the worst case scenario estimate for Fortum's debt portfolio for the coming 12 months, was EUR 14 million (2006:18 million).
Fortum's policy is to hedge major transaction exposures while translation exposures are hedged selectively. These exposures are mainly hedged by forward contracts. The currency risk is calculated using Value-at-Risk (VaR) for one-day period at 95% confidence level for transaction exposure and for five day period at 95% confidence level for translation exposure. The limits for transaction and translation exposures are VaR EUR 5 million and EUR 10 million, respectively. On 31 December 2007 the open transaction and translation
exposures were EUR 23 million (2006: 9 million) and EUR 1,787 million (2006: 1,378 million). The VaR for the transaction exposure was EUR 0 million (2006: 0 million) and VaR for the translation exposure calculated without the fair value change of Renewable Energy Corporation (REC) in Hafslund was EUR 8 million (2006: 6 million). For further information about the accounting of Fortum's shareholding in Hafslund, see Note 23 Investments in associated companies and joint ventures.
| 31 December 2007 31 December 2006 |
||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EUR million | Net position | Hedge | Open | Net position | Hedge | Open |
| SEK | 6,266 | –6,300 | –34 | 6,763 | –6,761 | 2 |
| USD | –118 | 118 | 0 | –37 | 37 | 0 |
| NOK | 391 | –383 | 8 | 525 | –528 | –3 |
| Other | 194 | –191 | 3 | 140 | –130 | 10 |
| Total | 6,733 | –6,756 | –23 | 7,391 | –7,382 | 9 |
| 31 December 2007 | 31 December 2006 | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EUR million | Investment | Hedge | Open | Investment | Hedge | Open | ||
| SEK | 490 | – | 490 | 630 | – | 630 | ||
| NOK 1) | 1,109 | – | 1,109 | 505 | – | 505 | ||
| PLN | 122 | – | 112 | 113 | – | 113 | ||
| Other | 128 | –52 | 76 | 130 | – | 130 | ||
| Total | 1,849 | –52 | 1,787 | 1,378 | – | 1,378 |
1) NOK amount includes the fair value change of Renewable Energy Corporation (REC) shareholding in Hafslund approximately EUR 790 million (2006: 440 million), see Note 45 Events after the balance sheet date.
| 31 December 2007 | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Notional amount Remaining lifetimes |
Fair value | ||||||||
| EUR million | Under 1 year |
1–5 years |
Over 5 years |
Total | Positive | Negative | Net | ||
| Forward foreign exchange contracts | 3,889 | 563 | – | 4,452 | 59 | 30 | 29 | ||
| Interest rate swaps | 1,481 | 772 | 1,247 | 3,500 | 25 | 41 | –16 | ||
| Interest rate and currency swaps | 695 | 2,598 | – | 3,293 | 82 | 16 | 66 | ||
| Forward rate agreement | 503 | 238 | – | 741 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
| Total | 6,568 | 4,171 | 1,247 | 11,986 | 166 | 87 | 79 | ||
| Of which long-term | 93 | 49 | 44 | ||||||
| Short-term | 73 | 38 | 35 |
| 31 December 2007 | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Notional amount Remaining lifetimes |
Fair value | ||||||||
| EUR million | Under 1 year |
1–5 years |
Over 5 years |
Total | Positive | Negative | Net | ||
| Net investment hedging foreign exchange derivatives | 52 | – | – | 52 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
| Cash flow hedging foreign exchange derivatives | 341 | 110 | – | 451 | 1 | 10 | –9 | ||
| Non-hedging foreign exchange derivatives 1) | 3,496 | 453 | – | 3,949 | 58 | 20 | 38 | ||
| Total forward foreign exchange contracts | 3,889 | 563 | – | 4,452 | 59 | 30 | 29 | ||
| Fair value hedging interest rate derivatives | – | 300 | 1,141 | 1,441 | 0 | 23 | –23 | ||
| Cash flow hedging interest rate derivatives | – | 293 | 106 | 399 | 6 | 1 | 5 | ||
| Non-hedging interest rate derivatives 1) | 1,984 | 417 | – | 2,401 | 19 | 17 | 2 | ||
| Total interest rate derivatives | 1,984 | 1,010 | 1,247 | 4,241 | 25 | 41 | –16 | ||
| Non-hedging interest rate and currency swaps 1) | 695 | 2,598 | – | 3,293 | 82 | 16 | 66 | ||
| Total interest rate and currency swaps | 695 | 2,598 | – | 3,293 | 82 | 16 | 66 | ||
| Total | 6,568 | 4,171 | 1,247 | 11,986 | 166 | 87 | 79 |
1) Consists of deals without hedge-accounting status.
| 31 December 2006 | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Notional amount Remaining lifetimes |
Fair value | |||||||||
| EUR million | Under 1 year |
1–5 years |
Over 5 years |
Total | Positive | Negative | Net | |||
| Forward foreign exchange contracts | 5,191 | 65 | – | 5,256 | 5 | 66 | –61 | |||
| Interest rate swaps | 1,357 | 648 | 1,016 | 3,021 | 23 | 20 | 3 | |||
| Interest rate and currency swaps | 796 | 1,779 | – | 2,575 | 20 | 96 | –76 | |||
| Total | 7,344 | 2,492 | 1,016 | 10,852 | 48 | 182 | –134 | |||
| Of which long-term | 22 | 63 | –41 | |||||||
| Short-term | 26 | 119 | –93 | |||||||
| Notional amount Remaining lifetimes |
Fair value | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Under 1 year |
1–5 years |
Over 5 years |
Total | Positive | Negative | Net | ||
| – | – | – | – | – | – | – | ||
| 353 | 51 | – | 404 | 3 | 5 | –2 | ||
| 4,838 | 14 | – | 4,852 | 2 | 61 | –59 | ||
| 5,191 | 65 | – | 5,256 | 5 | 66 | –61 | ||
| – | 300 | 950 | 1,250 | 5 | – | 5 | ||
| – | 317 | 66 | 383 | 5 | – | 5 | ||
| 1,357 | 31 | – | 1,388 | 13 | 20 | –7 | ||
| 1,357 | 648 | 1,016 | 3,021 | 23 | 20 | 3 | ||
| 796 | 1,779 | – | 2,575 | 20 | 96 | –76 | ||
| 796 | 1,779 | – | 2,575 | 20 | 96 | –76 | ||
| 7,344 | 2,492 | 1,016 | 10,852 | 48 | 182 | –134 | ||
| 31 December 2006 |
1) Consists of deals without hedge-accounting status.
2) Fair values of hedging interest rate swaps have been netted against fair value change of the bond in the balance sheet in 2006.
| Share derivatives | 31 December 2007 | 31 December 2006 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EUR million | Notional value |
Net fair value |
Notional value |
Net fair value |
|
| Share forwards | 36 | 66 | 24 | 37 |
Cash-settled share forwards are used as a hedging instrument for the Fortum share price risk regarding the Fortum Group's performance share arrangement. See Note 31 Employee bonus and incentive schemes for more information about the Group's performance share arrangement. The maturity of the share forwards is 1–5 years. The amounts disclosed are non-discounted cash flows for the share derivatives.
Exposures against limits and counterparties' creditworthiness are monitored to ensure that the risks are at an accepted level. When changes appear to be leading to unacceptable risks according to approved policies, Corporate Credit Control initiates actions to mitigate risks.
Counterparty risk exposures relating to financial derivative instruments are often volatile. The majority of the Group's commodity derivatives are cleared by the Nordic electricity exchange, Nord Pool. Derivative transactions are also done with other individual external counterparties on the financial or commodity markets. Counterparty risk in the retail and wholesale business is well diversified over a large number of private individuals and industrial companies.
Fortum Corporation Annual Report 2007 – Financials
| 2007 | 2006 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EUR million | Carrying amount |
of which past due |
Carrying amount |
of which past due |
| Investment grade receivables | 173 | – | 79 | – |
| Electricity exchanges | 9 | – | 101 | – |
| Associated companies | 639 | – | 603 | – |
| Other | 219 | – | 211 | – |
| Total | 1,040 | – | 994 | – |
Fortum wants to have a prudent and efficient capital structure which at the same time allows the implementation of its strategy. The Group monitors the capital structure based on Net debt / EBITDA ratio. Net debt is calculated as interest-bearing liabilities less cash and cash equivalents. EBITDA is calculated by adding back depreciation, amortisation and impairment charges to operating profit. During 2007, which was unchanged from 2006, target capital structure has been defined as Net debt / EBITDA between 3.0–3.5.
Capital expenditure, acquisitions, dividend distributions, repurchases of own shares and capital returns to shareholders are ways to move towards the target capital structure.
Fortum's dividend policy states that the company aims to pay a dividend which corresponds to an average payout ratio of 50 to 60%.
Fortum Corporation's long-term credit rating from Moody's and Standard and Poor's was A2 (stable) and A- (stable), respectively.
| EUR million | Note | 2007 | 2006 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Interest-bearing liabilities | 33 | 4,893 | 4,502 |
| Less: Cash and cash equivalents | 28 | 427 | 157 |
| Net debt | 4,466 | 4,345 | |
| Operating profit | 1,847 | 1,455 | |
| Add: Depreciation, amortisation and impairment charges | 451 | 429 | |
| EBITDA | 2,298 | 1,884 | |
| Net debt / EBITDA 1) | 1.9 | 2.3 |
1) Net debt/EBITDA for 2007 is 2.2 based on EBITDA excluding capital gain from the sale of Fortum's holding in Lenenergo amounting to EUR 232 million.
Fortum's business operations are organised in seven business units. Financial target setting, follow up and allocation of resources in the group's performance management process is based on the business units' comparable operating profit including share of associated companies and return on comparable net assets. Fortum's business units are grouped into business segments in the external reporting.
Fortum's shared service centers consist of Corporate Financial Services, Corporate IT Services and Corporate Support Services. The service units have service level agreements with the business units for services provided.
Power Generation segment generates and sells power mainly to the Nordic electricity market and is also responsible for the risk management operations within power generation. Power Generation segment consists of the business units Generation, Portfolio Management and Trading and Service. The Portfolio Management and Trading business unit within the segment is responsible for optimising the operating of power plants and for selling power to the Nordic power exchange Nord Pool. Generation is responsible for ownership, operation and maintenance of Fortum's power plants and Service business unit provides operation and maintenance services for the Nordic market and selected international markets.
Heat provides district heating and cooling, industrial steam and energy produced in waste-to-energy production to industrial companies, municipalities and end-users in the Nordic countries, the Baltic countries and Poland. The Heat segment also sells electricity from its combined heat and power production (CHP) to the Nordic power exchange Nord Pool. Heat consists of two business units, Heat and Värme. Heat and Värme have similar businesses, but are separated into two business units since the City of Stockholm has a 50% economic interest in Värme. Värme's business operations are
Fortum Corporation Annual Report 2007 – Financials
Distribution is responsible for a reliable and secure electricity supply to its customers in the Nordic countries and Estonia. Fortum owns and operates distribution and regional networks and distributes electricity to a total of 1.6 million customers in Sweden, Finland, Norway and Estonia. Electricity distribution is considered and accepted as a regulated business, and is therefore supervised by national energy authorities. Models and principles for supervision and considerations of reasonable tariffs differ from country to country.
Markets is responsible for offering energy solutions to its 1.3 million customers in Finland, Sweden and Norway. The segment buys its electricity from Nord Pool and sells is further to household and business customers as well as other retailers in the Nordic countries. In addition to the actual sale of electricity, Markets provides comprehensive risk and portfolio management solutions to its business customers. Electricity supply in the Nordic countries is a deregulated business since 1995 which means that customers can freely change electricity supplier.
Other includes mainly corporate center, but also the Fortum Group shared service centers. The shared service centers charge the companies according to service level agreements.
Power Generation segment sells its production to Nord Pool and Markets buys its electricity from Nord Pool. Eliminations of sales include eliminations of sales and purchases with Nord Pool that are netted on group level on an hourly basis and posted either as revenue or cost depending on if Fortum is a net seller or net buyer during any particular hour.
Inter-segment sales, expenses and results for the different business segments are affected by intra-group deliveries, which are eliminated on consolidation. Internal prices are market-based.
Fortum discloses in the segment information operating profit and comparable operating profit as well as return on net assets and comparable return on net assets.
Comparable operating profit is disclosed to give a better view of each segment's performance. The following items in operating profit have been adjusted for in comparable operating profit:
Segment net assets consist primarily of non-interest-bearing assets and liabilities such as property, plant and equipment, intangible assets, investments in associated companies, inventories, operative related accruals and trade and other receivables and liabilities. Net assets also include Fortum's share of the State Nuclear Waste Management Fund, nuclear related provisions, pension and other provisions as well as assets and liabilities from fair valuations of derivatives hedging future cash-flows which do not obtain hedge accounting status according to IAS 39.
Interest-bearing receivables and liabilities and related accruals, current and deferred tax items, and assets and liabilities from fair valuations of derivatives hedging future cash-flows which obtain hedge accounting status according to IAS 39 are not allocated to the segments' net assets.
In comparable net assets, segment net assets are adjusted for assets and liabilities from fair valuations of derivatives hedging future cash-flows which do not obtain hedge accounting status according to IAS 39 to be in line with comparable operating profit.
Gross investments in shares include investments in subsidiary shares, shares in associated companies and other shares in available for sale financial assets. Investments in subsidiary shares are net of cash and grossed with interest-bearing liabilities in the acquired company.
See also Definitions of key figures, Key financial ratios and Operational key figures, pages 88–95.
| EUR million | Power Generation |
Heat | Distribution | Markets | Other Eliminations | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sales | 2,350 | 1,356 | 769 | 1,683 | 81 | –1,760 | 4,479 |
| Internal sales | 323 | 38 | 9 | 155 | 72 | –597 | 0 |
| External sales | 2,027 | 1,318 | 760 | 1,528 | 9 | –1,163 | 4,479 |
| Depreciation, amortisation and impairment | –102 | –163 | –162 | –11 | –13 | –451 | |
| Operating profit | 1,125 | 294 | 465 | 12 | –49 | 1,847 | |
| Share of profit of associated companies and joint ventures |
196 | 24 | 18 | 3 | 0 | 241 | |
| Finance costs – net | –154 | ||||||
| Income taxes | –326 | ||||||
| Profit for the period | 1,608 | ||||||
| EUR million | Power Generation |
Heat | Distribution | Markets | Other | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Operating profit | 1,125 | 294 | 465 | 12 | –49 | 1,847 |
| Non-recurring items | –14 | –2 | –232 | 0 | –2 | –250 |
| Other operating items effecting comparability | –18 1) | –2 | –2 | –13 | 2 | –33 |
| Comparable operating profit | 1,093 | 290 | 231 | –1 | –49 | 1,564 |
1) Includes effects from the accounting of Fortum's part of the Finnish State Nuclear Waste Management Fund with EUR 17 million, see Note 37 Nuclear related assets and liabilities.
| EUR million | Power Generation |
Heat | Distribution | Markets | Other | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Recognised impairment losses for trade receivables | –1 | 6 | –2 | –5 | – | –2 |
| Recognised impairment losses for property, plant and equipment | – | – | – | – | – | 0 |
| Restructuring costs | – | – | 1 | – | – | 1 |
| Average number of employees | 3,475 | 2,302 | 1,060 | 936 | 531 | 8,304 |
| EUR million | Power Generation |
Heat | Distribution | Markets | Other and eliminations |
Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Non-interest-bearing assets | 5,269 | 3,770 | 3,550 | 622 | 274 | 13,485 |
| Investments in associated companies and joint ventures | 2,455 | 158 | 232 | 8 | 0 | 2,853 |
| Assets included in Net assets | 7,724 | 3,928 | 3,782 | 630 | 274 | 16,338 |
| Interest-bearing receivables | 747 | |||||
| Deferred tax assets | 3 | |||||
| Other assets | 159 | |||||
| Cash and cash equivalents | 427 | |||||
| Total assets | 17,674 |
| EUR million | Power Generation |
Heat | Distribution | Markets | Other and eliminations |
Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Liabilities included in Net assets | 576 | 421 | 539 | 383 | 134 | 2,053 |
| Deferred tax liabilities | 1,687 | |||||
| Other liabilities | 390 | |||||
| Total liabilities included in Capital employed | 4,130 | |||||
| Interest-bearing liabilities | 4,893 | |||||
| Total equity | 8,651 | |||||
| Total equity and liabilities | 17,674 | |||||
| Gross investments in shares | 297 | 18 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 317 |
| Capital expenditure | 93 | 309 | 236 | 3 | 14 | 655 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EUR million | Net assets by segments |
Return on net assets (%) |
Comparable return on net assets (%) 2) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Power Generation | 7,148 | 19.2 | 17.7 |
| Heat | 3,507 | 9.3 | 9.2 |
| Distribution | 3,243 | 14.5 | 7.5 |
| Markets | 247 | 6.9 | –0.6 |
2) In Power Generation segment approximately EUR 180 million gain in relation to Hafslund's divestment of REC-shares is excluded from the share of profits of associates and joint ventures. From Q4 2007 the REC-shares have been excluded from the net assets as well. 2006 have been restated accordingly.
| Power | Heat | Distribution | Markets | Other Eliminations | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EUR million | Generation | ||||||
| Sales | 2,439 | 1,268 | 753 | 1,912 | 78 | –1,959 | 4,491 |
| Internal sales | –133 | –32 | 8 | 149 | 62 | –54 | 0 |
| External sales | 2,572 | 1,300 | 745 | 1,763 | 16 | –1,905 | 4,491 |
| Depreciation, amortisation and impairment | –108 | –144 | –147 | –19 | –11 | –429 | |
| Operating profit | 980 | 264 | 252 | –6 | –35 | 1,455 | |
| Share of profit of associated companies and joint ventures |
30 | 23 | 15 | 1 | 0 | 69 | |
| Finance costs – net | –103 | ||||||
| Income taxes | –301 | ||||||
| Profit for the period | 1,120 | ||||||
| EUR million | Power Generation |
Heat | Distribution | Markets | Other | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Operating profit | 980 | 264 | 252 | –6 | –35 | 1,455 |
| Non-recurring items | –29 | –20 | –2 | 0 | –10 | –61 |
| Other operating items effecting comparability | 34 1) | 9 | 0 | 2 | –2 | 43 |
| Comparable operating profit | 985 | 253 | 250 | –4 | –47 | 1,437 |
1) Includes effects from the accounting of Fortum's part of Finnish State Nuclear Waste Management Fund with EUR 0 million, see Note 37 Nuclear related assets and liabilities.
| EUR million | Power Generation |
Heat | Distribution | Markets | Other | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Recognised impairment losses for trade receivables | – | – | –2 | –2 | – | –4 |
| Recognised impairment losses for property, plant and equipment | –1 | –1 | – | – | – | –2 |
| Restructuring costs | –1 | –2 | –2 | –3 | –2 | –10 |
| Average number of employees | 4,147 | 2,345 | 983 | 825 | 610 | 8,910 |
| EUR million | Power Generation |
Heat | Distribution | Markets | Other and eliminations |
Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Non-interest-bearing assets | 5,379 | 3,720 | 3,624 | 610 | 255 13,588 | |
| Investments in associated companies and joint ventures | 1,752 | 150 | 287 | 8 | 0 | 2,197 |
| Assets included in Net assets | 7,131 | 3,870 | 3,911 | 618 | 255 15,785 | |
| Interest-bearing receivables | 693 | |||||
| Deferred tax assets | 5 | |||||
| Other assets | 199 | |||||
| Cash and cash equivalents | 157 | |||||
| Total assets | 16,839 |
| EUR million | Power Generation |
Heat | Distribution | Markets | Other and eliminations |
Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Liabilities included in Net assets | 397 | 463 | 499 | 442 | 170 | 1,971 |
| Deferred tax liabilities | 1,795 | |||||
| Other liabilities | 410 | |||||
| Total liabilities included in Capital employed | 4,176 | |||||
| Interest-bearing liabilities | 4,502 | |||||
| Total equity | 8,161 | |||||
| Total equity and liabilities | 16,839 | |||||
| Gross investments in shares | 145 | 589 | 130 | 6 | 40 | 910 |
| Capital expenditure | 95 | 184 | 183 | 8 | 15 | 485 |
| EUR million | Net assets by segments |
Return on net assets (%) |
Comparable return on net assets (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Power Generation | 6,734 | 16.1 | 16.9 |
| Heat | 3,407 | 9.6 | 9.2 |
| Distribution | 3,412 | 8.4 | 8.3 |
| Markets | 176 | –1.6 | –0.8 |
The group's business segments operate mainly in the Nordic countries and other parts of the Baltic Rim area. Power Generation, Distribution and Markets operate mainly in Finland and Sweden, whereas Heat operates in all geographical segments. Other European countries are mainly the Baltic countries and the U.K. The home country is Finland.
Sales figures are based on the country in which the customer is located. Assets, capital expenditure and personnel are reported where the assets and personnel are located. Investments in associated companies and joint ventures are not divided by geographical segments since the companies concerned can have business in several geographical areas.
| EUR million | 2007 | 2006 |
|---|---|---|
| Finland 1) | 1,488 | 1,521 |
| Sweden | 2,161 | 2,471 |
| Norway 1) | 488 | 189 |
| Poland | 133 | 128 |
| Other European countries | 209 | 182 |
| Total | 4,479 | 4,491 |
1) From 2006 the Finnish power production is sold to Nord Pool in Norway, whereas Swedish power production is sold through Nord Pool in Stockholm.
Sales and purchases with Nord Pool are netted on country level on an hourly basis and posted either as revenue or cost depending on if Fortum is a net seller or net buyer during any particular hour.
| EUR million | 2007 | 2006 |
|---|---|---|
| Finland | 203 | 146 |
| Sweden | 370 | 299 |
| Norway | 22 | 17 |
| Poland | 19 | 6 |
| Other European countries | 41 | 17 |
| Total | 655 | 485 |
| EUR million | 2007 | 2006 |
|---|---|---|
| Finland | 3,829 | 3,739 |
| Sweden | 9,238 | 9,712 |
| Norway | 233 | 207 |
| Poland | 239 | 219 |
| Other European countries | 232 | 214 |
| Eliminations | –286 | –503 |
| Non-interest bearing assets | 13,485 | 13,588 |
| Investments in associated companies and joint ventures | 2,853 | 2,197 |
| Total | 16,338 | 15,785 |
| 2007 | 2006 | |
|---|---|---|
| Finland | 2,981 | 2,976 |
| Sweden | 3,465 | 3,321 |
| Norway | 277 | 261 |
| Poland | 925 | 990 |
| Other European countries | 655 | 586 |
| Total | 8,303 | 8,134 |
Fair value changes in operating profit presented below are arising from financial derivatives hedging future cash flows where hedge accounting is not applied according to IAS 39 and the ineffectiveness from cash flow hedges.
Fair value changes of currency derivatives in net financial expenses are arising mainly from balance sheet hedges without hedge accounting status according to IAS 39, because they are natural hedges of loans and receivables. Fair value change of interest rate hedges without hedge accounting is EUR 5 million (2006: 17 million). The net effect of fair value changes of hedging derivative and hedged bonds are EUR –1 million (2006: 4 million).
| EUR million | 2007 | 2006 |
|---|---|---|
| In operating profit | ||
| Fair value changes from derivatives not getting hedge accounting status | ||
| Electricity derivatives | –7 | –31 |
| Currency derivatives | 18 | –1 |
| Oil derivatives | 4 | –6 |
| Share derivatives 1) | –2 | 2 |
| Ineffectiveness from cash flow hedges | 2 | –6 |
| Total effect in operating profit | 15 | –42 |
| Fair value changes of derivatives not getting hedge accounting included | ||
| in share of profit of associated companies | 2 | 3 |
| In finance costs | ||
| Exchange gains and losses on loans and receivables | –233 | 185 |
| Fair value changes of derivatives not getting hedge accounting status | ||
| Currency derivatives | 236 | –176 |
| Interest rate derivatives | 5 | 17 |
| Fair value change of hedging derivatives in fair value hedge relationship | –37 | –27 |
| Fair value change of hedged item in fair value hedge relationship | 36 | 31 |
| Total effect in finance costs | 7 | 30 |
| Total effect of derivatives on profit before income tax | 24 | –9 |
1) Related to cash-settled share forwards used as a hedging instrument for Fortum Group's performance share agreement.
Fortum discloses in segment reporting comparable operating profit to give a better view of each segment's performance. The following items in operating profit have been adjusted for in comparable operating profit:
cash-flow hedges obtain hedge accounting where the fair value changes are recorded in equity.
• effects from the accounting of Fortum's part of the State Nuclear Waste Management Fund where the assets in the balance sheet cannot exceed the related liabilities according to IFRIC 5.
In 2007 Fortum acquired the shares in Pärnu Energia OÜ (renamed Fortum Pärnu OÜ) in Estonia, in Vattenfall Latvija SIA (renamed Fortum Latvija SIA) in Latvia and in EC Wojkowice in Poland. The total investments amounted to EUR 18 million.
Material acquisitions in 2006 consisted mainly of E.ON Finland Oyj (renamed Fortum Espoo Oyj). In 2006 Fortum invested EUR 765 million in subsidiary shares, of which the investment in Fortum Espoo represented EUR 713 million.
The effect of the acquisitions on the 2007 sales is EUR 8 million, being:
| EUR million | 2007 | 2006 |
|---|---|---|
| Power Generation | 0 | 2 |
| Heat | 18 | 587 |
| Distribution | 0 | 130 |
| Markets | – | 6 |
| Other and eliminations | 0 | 40 |
| Total | 18 | 765 |
| EUR million | 2007 | 2006 |
|---|---|---|
| Finland | 0 | 714 |
| Sweden | 0 | – |
| Other European countries | 18 | 51 |
| Total | 18 | 765 |
Gross Investments in subsidiary shares consist of interest-bearing debt as well as paid cash according to purchase agreement added with direct costs relating to the acquisition less cash and cash equivalents in acquired subsidiary.
No acquisitions or disposals of shares in subsidiaries which have a material effect on Fortum's income statement and balance sheet has been made during 2007. Gross investment in subsidiary shares (see definition of key figures) amounted to EUR 18 million.
Fortum acquired in the beginning of July 100% of the shares in EC Wojkowice. The acquired company in Poland concentrates on district heating production and sales in three cities. The company also sells electricity. The annual heat sales are around 64 GWh and electricity sales 320 MWh. The number of employees is 34.
Fortum acquired in January 2007 100% of the shares in Vattenfall Estonia AS and Vattenfall Latvia SIA from Vattenfall. The acquired company in Estonia provides district heat and natural gas in the city of Pärnu. Its district heat network is the fourth biggest in Estonia. The annual heat sales are 190 GWh, sales EUR 5.4 million and number of employees 58. The district heat business in Pärnu will be integrated to the current countrywide heat operations of Fortum Termest AS.
The acquired company in Latvia provides heat to Riga airport. The annual heat sales are around 12 GWh and sales around EUR 0.5 million. The acquisition provides a platform for Fortum to Latvian heat market.
Fortum has also acquired additional shares in its subsidiaries in Poland, Fortum Częstochowa SA 11.11% (total ownership 98.71%), Fortum Wroclaw 0.92% (total ownership of 99.17%), Fortum Plock SA 0.91% (total ownership of 98.66%) and Fortum DZT SA 0.63% (total ownership 99.92%).
| Consideration | |
|---|---|
| Total Group | |
| EUR million | Acquisitions |
| Purchase consideration: | |
| Cash paid | 11 |
| Direct costs relating to the acquisition | – |
| Total purchase consideration | 11 |
| Fair value of the acquired net assets | 11 |
| Translation difference | – |
| Goodwill | – |
| Total Group Acquisitions | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Total | Allocated | Acquired | |
| EUR million | Value | Fair Values | Book Value |
| Cash and cash equivalents | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Property, plant and equipment | 16 | 6 | 10 |
| Inventories | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Receivables | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Non-interest-bearing liabilities | –1 | 0 | –1 |
| Interest-bearing liabilities | –8 | 0 | –8 |
| Deferred tax liabilities | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Net identifiable assets | 9 | 6 | 3 |
| Minority interests | 2 | 2 | – |
| Fair value of the acquired net identifiable assets | 11 | 8 | 3 |
| Acquisitions | |
|---|---|
| Purchase consideration settled in cash | 11 |
| Cash and cash equivalents in subsidiaries acquired | 1 |
| Cash outflow on acquisition | 10 |
| Interest-bearing debt in subsidiaries acquired | 8 |
| Gross investment in subsidiaries acquired | 18 |
Fortum acquired 99.8% of the shares of Fortum Espoo Oy (former E.On Finland Oyj) on 26 June 2006 after approval by Finnish Competition Authority. On 13 September 2006 Fortum obtained the title to all minority shares of Fortum Espoo in the redemption procedure according to the Finnish Companies Act. The quotation of Fortum Espoo Oy's share on Helsinki Stock Exchange, ceased on 13 September 2006. On 31 December 2006 Fortum Espoo Oy demerged into Fortum Espoo Markets Oy, Fortum Espoo Distribution Oy and Fortum Espoo Power and Heat Oy. Fortum Espoo has been consolidated from 30 June 2006.
The acquisition was accounted for using the purchase method under which Fortum allocated the total purchase consideration to assets and liabilities based on their fair values. Fortum Espoo business areas comprise sale of electricity to retail and business customers, ownership and operation of electricity networks as well as generation and sales of power and heat located mainly to Espoo and Joensuu, Finland. At the year-end it employed 336 persons and had sales of EUR 271 million for the year, of which EUR 131 million arose after the acquisition.
The effect on Fortum's operating profit from the Fortum Espoo Oy acquisition for the six months post-acquisition showed an operating profit of EUR 16 million, including EUR 5 million in restructuring costs, and profit for the period of EUR 13 million. These amounts have been calculated using the Group's accounting policies and by adjusting the results of the subsidiary to reflect the
additional depreciation that has been charged due to the fair value adjustments of intangible assets and property, plant and equipment together with the consequential tax effects.
Fortum has fulfilled the conditions set by the Competition Authority for the realisation of the Fortum Espoo acquisition. In October, Fortum finalised the sale of its combined heat and power plant in Hämeenlinna, Finland, to Vattenfall. In November 2006, Fortum sold its 154-MW peat-fired power plant in Haapavesi, Finland, to Kanteleen Voima Oy, which is owned by a group of regional energy companies. Fortum has also sold the equivalent of 1 TWh/a of constant generation capacity in the Finnish area from November 2006 to the end of March 2011. Fortum has leased its 308-MW share of the Meri-Pori power plant from January 2007 to the end of June 2010.
Details of the Fortum Espoo Oy acquisition are shown in the table below, along with figures for the entire Group; no other single acquisition was deemed material.
In October 2006 Fortum completed its acquisition in Fortum Wroclaw S.A. The business had full year sales of EUR 74 million in 2006 and employed 203 people at the year end. The operating profit including the fair value adjustments of property, plant and equipment together with the consequential tax effects amounted to EUR 5 million, with a profit for the period of EUR 5 million.
| Fortum | Total Group | |
|---|---|---|
| EUR million | Espoo Group | Acquisitions |
| Purchase consideration: | ||
| Cash paid | 761 | 812 |
| Direct costs relating to the acquisition | 5 | 6 |
| Total purchase consideration | 766 | 818 |
| Fair value of the acquired net assets | 766 | 817 |
| Translation difference | – | 1 |
| Goodwill | 0 | 0 |
| Fortum Espoo Group | Total Group Acquisitions | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EUR million | Total Value |
Allocated Fair Values |
Acquired Book Value |
Total Value |
Allocated Fair Values |
Acquired Book Value |
| Cash and cash equivalents | 64 | – | 64 | 64 | – | 64 |
| Intangible assets | 13 | –28 | 41 | 13 | –28 | 41 |
| Property, plant and equipment | 1,008 | 696 | 312 | 995 | 683 | 312 |
| Shares | 3 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 2 |
| Inventories | 18 | – | 18 | 18 | – | 18 |
| Receivables | 185 | 23 | 162 | 185 | 23 | 162 |
| Deferred tax assets | 19 | 18 | 1 | 19 | 18 | 1 |
| Non-interest-bearing liabilities | –307 | –17 | –290 | –307 | –17 | –290 |
| Interest-bearing liabilities | –11 | – | –11 | –11 | – | –11 |
| Deferred tax liabilities | –226 | –190 | –36 | –224 | –188 | –36 |
| Net identifiable assets | 766 | 503 | 263 | 755 | 492 | 263 |
| Minority interests | – | – | – | 62 | 62 | – |
| Fair value of the acquired net identifiable assets | 766 | 503 | 263 | 817 | 554 | 263 |
| Fortum Espoo Group |
Total Group | |
|---|---|---|
| Acquisitions | ||
| Purchase consideration settled in cash | 766 | 818 |
| Cash and cash equivalents in subsidiaries acquired | 64 | 64 |
| Cash outflow on acquisition | 702 | 754 |
| Interest-bearing debt in subsidiaries acquired | 11 | 11 |
| Gross investment in subsidiaries acquired | 713 | 765 |
There have been no disposals in 2007.
In 2006 Fortum sold its industrial maintenance services business with operations in Finland and Sweden. Industrial maintenance service was a business area within the Service business unit in Power Generation segment and had total external sales of EUR 70
million from January to October 2006. Some 900 employees were transferred in connection with the deal. The divestment included both subsidiary shares and assets. In 2006 Fortum also sold Bromölla Fjärrvärme AB, its Swedish subsidiary. The total disposal consideration was EUR 11 million.
The income statement of subsidiaries, whose measurement and reporting currency are not euros, are translated into the Group reporting currency using the average exchange rates, whereas the balance sheet of such subsidiaries are translated using the exchange rates on the balance sheet date.
The balance sheet date rate is based on exchange rate published by the European Central Bank for the closing date. The average exchange rate is calculated as an average of each month's ending rate from the European Central Bank during the year and ending rate previous year.
| Average rate | Balance sheet date rate | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Currency | 2007 | 2006 | 31 Dec 2007 | 31 Dec 2006 | |
| Sweden | SEK | 9.2475 | 9.2637 | 9.4415 | 9.0404 |
| Norway | NOK | 8.0253 | 8.0376 | 7.9580 | 8.2380 |
| Poland | PLN | 3.7792 | 3.8965 | 3.5935 | 3.8310 |
| Russia | RUB | 35.0759 | 34.1475 | 35.9860 | 34.6800 |
| EUR million | 2007 | 2006 |
|---|---|---|
| Power sales excluding indirect taxes | 2,370 | 2,437 |
| Heating sales | 1,096 | 1,014 |
| Network transmissions | 729 | 716 |
| Other sales | 284 | 324 |
| Total | 4,479 | 4,491 |
Power sales include eliminations on sales and purchases with Nord Pool that are netted on Fortum Group level on an hourly basis and posted either as revenue or cost depending on if Fortum is a net seller or a net buyer during any particular hour. Heating sales include sale of delivered heat and transmission of heat. Other sales include cooling sales of EUR 22 (2006: 20) million, connection fees
of electricity and district heating distribution of EUR 42 (2006: 37) million and sale of gas and other fuels of EUR 52 (2006: 51) million. Other sales also include sales from contracts in progress entered as income according to the percentage of completion of EUR 42 million in 2007 (2006: 44 million).
| EUR million | 2007 | 2006 |
|---|---|---|
| Capital gains on disposal of non-current assets | 290 | 71 |
| Rental income | 39 | 9 |
| Fair value changes on derivatives that do not qualify for hedge accounting status (Note 7) | 16 | –43 |
| Other items | 48 | 43 |
| Total | 393 | 80 |
Revenue from activities outside normal operations is reported in other income. This includes recurring items such as rental income and non-recurring items such as gains from sale of shares, etc. Gains on sale of shares, property, plant and equipment and emission rights are included in capital gains on disposal of non-current assets.
In August 2007 Fortum sold its shares in JSC Lenenergo. As a result of the divestment, Fortum booked an after tax gain of EUR 232 million. Capital gains also includes gain on sale of emission rights EUR 39 million (2006: 10 million). Costs for made emissions which are not covered by emission rights received for free were EUR 0 million (2006: 10 million). The costs are included in Materials and services.
Fortum has leased its 308-MW share of the Meri-Pori power plant from January 2007 to the end of June 2010. The lease agreement is classified as an operating lease and has increased the rental income in 2007.
Changes in the fair value of any derivative instruments that do not qualify for hedge accounting are recognised immediately in other income.
| EUR million | 2007 | 2006 |
|---|---|---|
| Purchases | 825 | 971 |
| Purchases from associated companies | 519 | 487 |
| Purchases from joint ventures | – | 1 |
| Transmission costs | 131 | 122 |
| Change in inventories | 18 | –3 |
| External services | 79 | 95 |
| Total | 1,572 | 1,673 |
Purchases contain mainly nuclear and coal fuel purchased for producing power and heat. Purchases from associated companies consist of purchases of nuclear power and hydro power at production costs including interest costs and income taxes. See Note 23 Investments in associated companies and joint ventures. Total
purchases include production taxes and duties EUR 84 million (2006: 149 million) of which nuclear related property taxes EUR 68 million (2006: 66 million) and hydro power related property taxes EUR 11 million (2006: 10 million).
| EUR million | 2007 | 2006 |
|---|---|---|
| Operation and maintenance costs | 116 | 115 |
| Property taxes | 66 | 56 |
| IT and telecommunication costs | 76 | 92 |
| Research and development costs | 21 | 17 |
| Other items | 228 | 226 |
| Total | 507 | 506 |
The major components recorded in other expenses are the external operation and maintenance costs of power and heat plants and of
transmission lines. Property taxes include property taxes relating to hydro power production EUR 55 million (2006: 52 million).
| EUR million | 2007 | 2006 |
|---|---|---|
| Audit fees | 1.0 | 1.0 |
| Audit related assignments | 0.1 | 0.0 |
| Tax assignments | 0.4 | 0.0 |
| Other assignments | 0.3 | 0.2 |
| Total | 1.8 | 1.2 |
| EUR million | 2007 | 2006 |
|---|---|---|
| Wages and salaries | 348 | 339 |
| Pensions | ||
| Defined contribution plans | 35 | 36 |
| Defined benefit plans (Note 36) | 11 | 15 |
| Social security costs | 77 | 91 |
| Share-based remunerations (Note 31) | 8 | 9 |
| Other post-employment benefits | 0 | 1 |
| Other employee costs | 16 | 17 |
| Total | 495 | 508 |
The Nomination and Compensation Committee discusses, assesses and makes recommendations and proposals on the remuneration policy, pay structures, bonus and incentive systems for the Group
and its management, and contributes to the Group's nomination issues. The remuneration policy is determined by the Board of Directors.
Fortum Corporation Annual Report 2007 – Financials
The compensation package for Fortum employees consists of a combination of salaries, benefits, short-term incentives and deferred share-based long-term incentives. The majority of Fortum employees are covered by an annual performance bonus system. The long-term incentive schemes are intended for senior executives
The Supervisory Board comprises a minimum of six and a maximum of 12 members. The Supervisory Board meetings are also attended by employee representatives who are not members of the Supervisory Board. The Annual General Meeting confirms the remuneration for the Supervisory Board members.
Each Supervisory Board member receives a fixed monthly fee and a meeting fee. The employee representatives receive only a
and other management of the Fortum Group.
For further information on Fortum's employee bonus and equity incentive schemes, see Note 31 and for pension obligations see Note 36.
meeting fee. All members are entitled to travel expense compensation against receipts in accordance with the company's travel policy. Members of the Supervisory Board are not offered stock options, warrants or participation in other incentive schemes, nor do they have a pension plan in Fortum.
Total remuneration for the Supervisory Board service in 2007 has been EUR 79 thousand (2006: 85 thousand).
| EUR thousand | 2007 | 2006 |
|---|---|---|
| Chairman, Peter Fagernäs | 62 | 63 |
| Deputy chairman, Birgitta Kantola | 50 | 50 |
| Other members of the Board | 186 | 190 |
| Total | 298 | 303 |
The Board of Directors comprises five to seven members who are elected at the Annual General Meeting for a one-year term of office, which expires at the end of the first Annual General Meeting following the election. During 2007and 2006 the Board consisted of seven members.
The Annual General Meeting confirms a yearly compensation for Board service. In addition, a EUR 500 meeting fee of is paid. The meeting fee is also paid for committee meetings and is paid in double to a member who lives outside Finland in Europe. The members are entitled to travel expense compensation in accordance with the company's travel policy. Board members are not offered stock options, warrants or participation in other incentive schemes. There is no pension plan for non-executive members.
The table above shows total compensation for the Board of Directors paid by Fortum.
| 2007 | 2006 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EUR thousand | The President and CEO |
Other management team members |
The President and CEO |
Other management team members |
|
| Salaries and fringe benefits | 833 | 1,562 | 796 | 1,415 | |
| Performance bonuses | 297 | 540 | 385 | 585 | |
| Share-based remunerations | 629 | 1,081 | 571 | 1,802 | |
| Post-employment benefits | 1,169 | 508 | 736 | 776 | |
| Total | 2,928 | 3,691 | 2,488 | 4,578 |
The Fortum Management Team consists of eight members from 1 September 2007 (previously seven members), including the President and CEO to whom the members of the Management Team report.
The compensation package for Management Team and other senior management consists of base salaries, purposeful benefits, annual individual short-term incentives and deferred share-based long-term incentives.
The criteria used in determining the size of the annual bonus for senior management are decided annually by the Board of Directors on the recommendation of the Board's Nomination and Compensation Committee. The President and CEO as well as the Fortum Management Team are paid annual performance bonuses in addition to their salary and fringe benefits. The performance of each senior executive is evaluated annually. The size of each senior executive's annual bonus is dependent on the Group's financial
performance, as well as on their own success in reaching their individual goals, previously set for the President and CEO by the Board's Nomination and Compensation Committee. The evaluation is used by the Committee to determine the level of the President and CEO's compensation to be recommended to the Board of Directors for approval.
For the President and CEO and for part of the members of the Fortum Management Team, the retirement age is 60 and the pension paid is 66% or 60% of the remuneration. In the first case the pensions are insured and paid by Fortum's pension fund, and in the latter, pensions are insured by an insurance company. The pension of the President and CEO is 60% of the remuneration.
In the event that Fortum decides to give notice of termination to the President and CEO, he is entitled to compensation equaling 24 months' salary, other Management Team members for 12 to 18 months.
| EUR million | 2007 | 2006 |
|---|---|---|
| Depreciation of property, plant and equipment | ||
| Buildings and structures | 62 | 60 |
| Machinery and equipment | 360 | 331 |
| Other tangible assets | 6 | 5 |
| Amortisation of intangible assets | 23 | 31 |
| Total | 451 | 427 |
| Impairment charges | ||
| Other intangible assets | 0 | 1 |
| Buildings and structures | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 0 | 2 |
| Depreciation, amortisation and impairment charges total | 451 | 429 |
The increase of depreciation in 2007 is mainly due to the acquisition of Fortum Espoo, which took place in the end of June 2006.
| EUR million | 2007 | 2006 |
|---|---|---|
| Interest expense | ||
| Borrowings | –217 | –174 |
| Other interest expense | –3 | –2 |
| Total | –220 | –176 |
| Interest income | ||
| Loan receivables | 62 | 40 |
| Other interest income | 14 | 10 |
| Total | 76 | 50 |
| Fair value gains and losses on financial instruments 1) | 7 | 30 |
| Exchange gains and losses | ||
| Loans and receivables | –233 | 185 |
| Derivatives | 233 | –185 |
| Dividend income | 1 | 1 |
| Interest income on share of State Nuclear Waste Management Fund | 26 | 18 |
| Unwinding of discount on nuclear provisions | –35 | –24 |
| Other financial income | 1 | 2 |
| Other financial expenses | –10 | –4 |
| Total | –17 | –7 |
| Finance costs – net | –154 | –103 |
1) Please see Note 7 Fair value changes of derivatives and underlying items in the income statement.
Interest expenses include interest expenses on interest-bearing loans, interest on interest rate and currency swaps, forward points on forward foreign exchange contracts hedging loans and receivables. Other interest expenses include mainly interest on financial leases.
Interest income includes EUR 26 million (2006: 20 million) from shareholders' loans in Finnish and Swedish nuclear companies. Other interest income includes mainly income from financial leases as a lessor.
Fair value gains and losses on financial instruments include change in clean price of interest rate and cross currency swaps not getting hedge accounting and fair value changes of interest rate derivatives in hedge relationship and hedged items. Accrued interest on these derivatives is entered in interest expenses of borrowings. Fair value gains and losses include also rate difference from forward contracts hedging loans and receivables without hedge accounting. 2006 includes also realised foreign exchange gains EUR 4 million.
Exchange gains and losses includes exchange rate differences arising from valuation of foreign currency loans and receivables and exchange rate differences from forward foreign exchange contracts and interest rate and currency swaps.
| EUR million | 2007 | 2006 |
|---|---|---|
| Interest rate and cross currency swaps | ||
| Interest expenses on borrowings | 9 | 1 |
| Exchange rate difference from derivatives | 140 | –80 |
| Rate difference in fair value gains and losses on financial instruments 1) | –32 | –10 |
| Total fair value change of interest rate derivatives in finance costs – net | 117 | –89 |
| Interest expenses on borrowings | 10 | 14 |
|---|---|---|
| Exchange rate difference from derivatives | 93 | –101 |
| Rate difference in fair value gains and losses on financial instruments | 3 | 5 |
| Total fair value change of currency derivatives in finance costs – net | 106 | –82 |
| Total fair value change of interest and currency derivatives in finance costs – net | 223 | –171 |
1) Fair value gains and losses on financial instruments include fair value changes from interest rate swaps not getting hedge accounting amounting to EUR 5 million (2006: 17 million).
Aggregated exchange differences are included in operating profit with EUR –1 million (2006: –4 million) and in finance costs with EUR –5 million (2006: 0).
| EUR million | 2007 | 2006 |
|---|---|---|
| Finnish companies | 819 | 600 |
| Swedish companies | 577 | 546 |
| Other companies | 538 | 275 |
| Total | 1,934 | 1,421 |
| EUR million | 2007 | 2006 |
|---|---|---|
| Current taxes | ||
| Finnish companies | –146 | –135 |
| Swedish companies | –131 | –186 |
| Other companies | –32 | –19 |
| Total | –309 | –340 |
| Deferred taxes | ||
| Finnish companies | 6 | 2 |
| Swedish companies | –18 | 32 |
| Other companies | 5 | 6 |
| Total | –7 | 40 |
| Adjustments recognised for current tax of prior periods | ||
| Finnish companies | –5 | 5 |
| Swedish companies | –4 | –1 |
| Other companies | –1 | –5 |
| Total | –10 | –1 |
| Total income taxes | –326 | –301 |
Total adjustments recognised for current tax of prior periods in 2007 amounts to EUR –10 million, of which EUR –6 million relates to adjustments between deferred tax and current tax of prior periods.
the enacted tax rates in Finland:
| EUR million | 2007 | % | 2006 | % |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Profit before tax | 1,934 | 1,421 | ||
| Tax calculated at nominal Finnish tax rate | –503 | 26.0 | –369 | 26.0 |
| Differences in tax rates in other countries | –37 | 1.9 | –31 | 2.2 |
| Income not subject to tax | 6 | –0.3 | 12 | –0.8 |
| Tax exempt capital gains | 61 | –3.2 | 7 | –0.5 |
| Effects from legal restructurings and long-term internal financing | 87 | –4.5 | 61 | –4.4 |
| Expenses not deductible for tax purposes | –1 | 0.1 | –8 | 0.5 |
| Share of profit of associated companies and joint ventures | 67 | –3.5 | 18 | –1.3 |
| Taxes related to dividend distributions | –1 | 0.1 | 0 | 0.0 |
| Tax losses for which no deferred tax was recognised | –3 | 0.2 | 0 | 0.0 |
| Utilisation of previously unrecognised tax losses | 1 | –0.1 | 2 | –0.1 |
| Adjustments recognised for change in deferred tax of prior periods | 2 | –0.1 | 8 | –0.5 |
| Adjustments recognised for current tax of prior period | –5 | 0.3 | –1 | 0.1 |
| Tax charge in the income statement | –326 | 16.9 | –301 | 21.2 |
The weighted average applicable tax rate was 27.9% (2006: 27.9%). The tax rate according to the income statement was 16.9% (2006: 21.2%). Fortum's effective tax rate has developed beneficially under 2007. The main reasons effecting the tax rate are tax rate differences in different countries, profits from associated companies, tax exempt income, effective internal financial structures and company structure. The tax rate used in the income statement is always impacted by the fact that share of profits of associates and joint ventures are recorded based on Fortum's share of profits after tax. Excluding the share of profits from associates and Lenenergo sales gain, the tax rate was 22.3% (2006: 22.3%).
Fortum received substantial non taxable capital gains during 2007, which is one of the major reasons for decreased tax rate. These effects are mainly one-time effects. The capital gain from sale of
shares in JSC Lenenergo in August 2007 amounted to EUR 232 million. The share of profit of associated companies and joint ventures also decreased the effective tax rate mainly due to impact of Hafslund's sale of REC shares in March 2007 which impacted the share of profits from associates for the period with approximately EUR 180 million. Fortum completed various tax audits during the year. No major risks or failures were identified.
Fortum restructured its company and internal financing structure in 2006. These actions effected Fortum's tax rate beneficially fully in 2007 and are expected to continue beneficial effects in the future. This long-term effect was partially offset by income taxed in countries with a higher tax rate than Finland. Changes in business profitability by jurisdiction in the future could impact future tax results.
Basic earnings per share is calculated by dividing the profit attributable to equity holders of the Company by the weighted average number of ordinary shares in issue during the year.
| 2007 | 2006 | |
|---|---|---|
| Profit attributable to equity holders of the Company (EUR million) | 1,552 | 1,071 |
| Weighted average number of shares (thousands) | 889,997 | 881,194 |
| Basic earnings per share (EUR per share) | 1.74 | 1.22 |
Diluted earnings per share is calculated adjusting the weighted average number of ordinary shares outstanding to assume conversion of all dilutive potential ordinary shares. At the end of 2007 the Group has one diluting stock option scheme 2002 for key employees. For the warrants and stock options a calculation is done to determine the number of shares that could have been acquired at fair value (determined as the average annual market share price of the Fortum's shares) based on the monetary value of the subscription rights attached to outstanding options. The number of shares calculated as above is compared with the number of shares that would have been issued assuming the exercise of the stock options.
The number of shares calculated as above is deducted from the number of shares that would have been issued assuming the exercise of the stock options. The incremental shares obtained through the assumed exercise of the options and warrants are added to the weighted average number of shares outstanding.
Options and warrants have a dilutive effect only when the average market price of ordinary shares during the period exceeds the exercise price of the options or warrants. Previously reported earnings per share are not retroactively adjusted to reflect changes in price of ordinary shares.
| 2007 | 2006 | |
|---|---|---|
| Profit attributable to equity holders of the Company (EUR million) | 1,552 | 1,071 |
| Weighted average number of shares (thousands) | 889,997 | 881,194 |
| Effect of the 2001 key employees stock options | – | 1,345 |
| Effect of the 2002 key employees stock options | 1,398 | 4,390 |
| Diluted average number of shares (thousands) | 891,395 | 886,929 |
| Diluted earnings per share (EUR per share) | 1.74 | 1.21 |
The Annual General Meeting on 28 March 2007 decided to distribute a dividend of EUR 1.26 per share to the shareholders, of which EUR 0.73 per share is in accordance with the Group's dividend policy. An additional dividend of EUR 0.53 per share was decided to steer Fortum's capital structure towards agreed target. The total dividend amounted to EUR 1,122 million based on the amount of shares registered as of 2 April 2007. The dividend was paid on 11 April 2007.
In 2006, the total dividend amounted to EUR 1.12 per share, of which EUR 0.54 per share was attributable to the profit from discontinued operations. The total dividend amounted to EUR 987 million was paid on 28 March 2006.
A dividend in respect of 2007 of EUR 1.35 per share, amounting to a total dividend of EUR 1,197 million based on the number of shares registered as of 30 January 2008, is to be proposed at the Annual General Meeting on 1 April 2008. Of this total dividend, EUR 0.77 per share is to be paid from Fortum's recurring earnings. An additional dividend of EUR 0.58 per share is proposed in order to steer Fortum's capital structure. These financial statements do not reflect this dividend.
Financial assets and liabilities in the tables below are split into categories in accordance with IAS 39. The categories are further split into classes which are basis for valuing respective asset or liability. Further information can be found in the Notes mentioned in the table.
| 2007 | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Loans and receivables |
Financial assets at fair-value through profit and loss |
Fair-value recognised in equity, |
Available for sale |
Total financial assets |
|||
| EUR million | Note | Amortised cost |
Hedge accounting, fair value hedges |
Non-hedge accounting |
cash flow hedges |
financial assets |
|
| Financial instruments in non-current assets | |||||||
| Other long-term investments | 24 | 57 | 42 | 99 | |||
| Derivative financial instruments | 3 | ||||||
| Electricity derivatives | 51 | 5 | 56 | ||||
| Interest rate and currency derivatives | 6 | 87 | 93 | ||||
| Oil and other futures and forward contracts | 4 | 4 | |||||
| Long-term interest-bearing receivables | 25 | 648 | 648 | ||||
| Financial instruments in current assets | |||||||
| Derivative financial instruments | 3 | ||||||
| Electricity derivatives | 57 | 6 | 63 | ||||
| Interest rate and currency derivatives | 1 | 72 | 73 | ||||
| Oil and other futures and forward contracts | 4 | 4 | |||||
| Trade receivables | 27 | 840 | 840 | ||||
| Other interest-bearing receivables | 10 | 10 | |||||
| Cash and cash equivalents | 28 | 427 | 427 | ||||
| Total | 1,982 | 7 | 275 | 11 | 42 | 2,317 |
| 2006 | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Loans and receivables |
Financial assets at fair-value through profit and loss |
Fair-value recognised in equity, |
Available-for sale financial assets |
Total financial assets |
|||||
| EUR million | Note | Amortised cost |
Hedge accounting, fair value hedges |
Non-hedge accounting |
cash flow hedges |
||||
| Financial instruments in non-current assets | |||||||||
| Other long-term investments | 24 | 39 | 62 | 101 | |||||
| Derivative financial instruments | 3 | ||||||||
| Electricity derivatives | 53 | 10 | 63 | ||||||
| Interest rate and currency derivatives | 18 | 17 | 5 | 40 | |||||
| Oil futures and forward contracts | – | ||||||||
| Long-term interest-bearing receivables | 25 | 582 | 582 | ||||||
| Financial instruments in current assets | |||||||||
| Derivative financial instruments | 3 | ||||||||
| Electricity derivatives | 73 | 103 | 176 | ||||||
| Interest rate and currency derivatives | 18 | 3 | 21 | ||||||
| Oil futures and forward contracts | 1 | 1 | |||||||
| Trade receivables | 27 | 847 | 847 | ||||||
| Other interest-bearing receivables | 12 | 12 | |||||||
| Cash and cash equivalents | 28 | 157 | 157 | ||||||
| Total | 1,637 | 18 | 162 | 121 | 62 | 2,000 |
| 2007 | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Financial liabilities at fair-value through profit and loss |
Fair-value recognised in equity, |
Other financial liabilities | Total financial liabilities |
||||
| Hedge | Non-hedge | cash flow | Amortised cost |
Fair value |
|||
| accounting, | accounting | hedges | |||||
| fair value | |||||||
| EUR million | Note | hedges | |||||
| Financial instruments in non-current liabilities | |||||||
| Interest-bearing liabilities | 33 | 2,896 | 1,392 | 4,288 | |||
| Derivative financial instruments | 3 | ||||||
| Electricity derivatives | 49 | 39 | 88 | ||||
| Interest rate and currency derivatives | 29 | 20 | 49 | ||||
| Oil and other futures and forward contracts | 2 | 2 | |||||
| Financial instruments in current liabilities | |||||||
| Interest-bearing liabilities | 33 | 605 | 605 | ||||
| Derivative financial instruments | 3 | ||||||
| Electricity derivatives | 76 | 145 | 221 | ||||
| Interest rate and currency derivatives | 6 | 32 | 38 | ||||
| Oil and other futures and forward contracts | 1 | 1 | |||||
| Trade payables | 39 | 272 | 272 | ||||
| Other liabilities | 39 | 68 | 68 | ||||
| Total | 35 | 180 | 184 | 3,841 | 1,392 | 5,632 |
| 2006 | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Financial liabilities at fair-value through profit and loss |
Other financial liabilities | Total financial liabilities |
||||||||
| Hedge | Non-hedge | cash flow | Amortised | Fair | ||||||
| accounting, | accounting | hedges | cost | value | ||||||
| fair value | ||||||||||
| EUR million | Note | hedges | ||||||||
| Financial instruments in non-current liabilities |
||||||||||
| Interest-bearing liabilities 1) | 33 | 2,810 | 1,250 | 4,060 | ||||||
| Derivative financial instruments | 3 | – | ||||||||
| Electricity derivatives | 49 | 21 | 70 | |||||||
| Interest rate and currency derivatives | 62 | 2 | 64 | |||||||
| Oil futures and forward contracts | – | |||||||||
| Financial instruments in current liabilities | ||||||||||
| Interest-bearing liabilities | 33 | 442 | 442 | |||||||
| Derivative financial instruments | 3 | – | ||||||||
| Electricity derivatives | 49 | 28 | 77 | |||||||
| Interest rate and currency derivatives | 117 | 3 | 120 | |||||||
| Oil futures and forward contracts | 1 | 1 | ||||||||
| Trade payables | 39 | 242 | 242 | |||||||
| Other liabilities | 39 | 58 | 58 | |||||||
| Total | – | 278 | 54 | 3,552 | 1,250 | 5,134 | ||||
1) Fair values of hedging interest rate swaps have been netted against fair value of the bond in the balance sheet in 2006.
| EUR million | 2007 | 2006 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost 1 January | 317 | 238 |
| Exchange rate differences and other adjustments | –4 | 2 |
| Acquisitions through business combinations | 25 | 39 |
| Additions | 11 | 21 |
| Change in emission rights | –9 | 9 |
| Disposals | –9 | –4 |
| Reclassifications | 13 | 12 |
| Cost 31 December | 344 | 317 |
| Accumulated depreciation 1 January | 221 | 158 |
| Exchange rate differences and other adjustments | –2 | – |
| Acquisitions through business combinations | 25 | 26 |
| Disposals | –8 | –3 |
| Reclassifications | – | 9 |
| Depreciation for the period | 23 | 31 |
| Accumulated depreciation 31 December | 259 | 221 |
| Carrying amount 31 December | 85 | 96 |
Main items in intangible assets are costs for customer base, software products and software licenses, which are all amortised over their useful lives. Costs for customer base means a portfolio of customers or market share that is stated at fair value at the date of acquisition. Costs for customer base are tested for impairment annually.
Bought emission rights are recognised as intangible assets to the lower of fair value and historical cost. Emission rights received free of charge are accounted to nominal value. The amount of emission rights in intangible assets is EUR 0 million (2006: 9 million).
| Land, | Buildings, | Machinery | Other | Advances | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| waterfall | plants and | and | tangible | paid and | ||
| rights and | structures | equipment | assets | construction | ||
| EUR million | tunnels | in progress | ||||
| Cost 1 January 2007 | 3,189 | 2,237 | 11,363 | 221 | 401 | 17,411 |
| Exchange rate differences and other adjustments | –129 | –104 | –197 | –7 | –13 | –450 |
| Acquisitions through business combinations | – | 22 | 28 | – | – | 50 |
| Capital expenditure | – | 44 | 97 | 4 | 499 | 644 |
| Nuclear asset retirement cost | – | – | 25 | – | – | 25 |
| Disposals | –1 | –14 | –36 | –2 | –2 | –55 |
| Reclassifications | – | 188 | 105 | 1 | –307 | –13 |
| Cost 31 December 2007 | 3,059 | 2,373 | 11,385 | 217 | 578 | 17,612 |
| Accumulated depreciation 1 January 2007 | – | 1,006 | 4,798 | 136 | – | 5,940 |
| Exchange rate differences and other adjustments | – | 2 | –87 | –3 | – | –88 |
| Acquisitions through business combinations | – | 11 | 23 | – | – | 34 |
| Disposals | – | –8 | –35 | –2 | – | –45 |
| Depreciation for the period | – | 62 | 360 | 6 | – | 428 |
| Impairment charges | – | 0 | – | – | – | 0 |
| Accumulated depreciation 31 December 2007 | – | 1,073 | 5,059 | 137 | – | 6,269 |
| Carrying amount 31 December 2007 | 3,059 | 1,300 | 6,326 | 80 | 578 | 11,343 |
| Carrying amount 31 December 2006 | 3,189 | 1,231 | 6,565 | 85 | 401 | 11,471 |
| EUR million | Land, waterfall rights and tunnels |
Buildings, plants and structures |
Machinery and equipment |
Other tangible assets |
Advances paid and construction in progress |
Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cost 1 January 2006 | 3,077 | 2,056 | 9,832 | 197 | 242 | 15,404 |
| Exchange rate differences and other adjustments | 116 | 44 | 247 | –3 | 2 | 406 |
| Acquisitions through business combinations | 6 | 179 | 1,132 | 27 | 13 | 1,357 |
| Capital expenditure | – | 32 | 109 | 1 | 322 | 464 |
| Nuclear asset retirement cost | – | – | 14 | – | – | 14 |
| Disposals | –8 | –48 | –168 | –5 | –2 | –231 |
| Reclassifications | –2 | –26 | 197 | 4 | –176 | –3 |
| Cost 31 December 2006 | 3,189 | 2,237 | 11,363 | 221 | 401 | 17,411 |
| Accumulated depreciation 1 January 2006 | – | 916 | 4,182 | 130 | – | 5,228 |
| Exchange rate differences and other adjustments | – | 15 | 89 | 2 | – | 106 |
| Acquisitions through business combinations | – | 49 | 312 | 1 | – | 362 |
| Disposals | – | –35 | –116 | –3 | – | –154 |
| Depreciation for the period | – | 60 | 330 | 6 | – | 396 |
| Impairment charges | – | 1 | 1 | – | – | 2 |
| Accumulated depreciation 31 December 2006 | – | 1,006 | 4,798 | 136 | – | 5,940 |
| Carrying amount 31 December 2006 | 3,189 | 1,231 | 6,565 | 85 | 401 | 11,471 |
| Carrying amount 31 December 2005 | 3,077 | 1,140 | 5,650 | 67 | 242 | 10,176 |
Property, plant and equipment are subject to restrictions in the form of real estate mortgages, EUR 241 million (2006: 102 million), see Note 40 Pledged assets.
Fortum Corporation Annual Report 2007 – Financials
| Finland | Sweden | Other countries | Total | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EUR million | 2007 | 2006 | 2007 | 2006 | 2007 | 2006 | 2007 | 2006 |
| Power Generation | ||||||||
| Hydro Power | 3 | 7 | 50 | 48 | – | – | 53 | 55 |
| Nuclear Power | 32 | 35 | – | – | – | – | 32 | 35 |
| Fossil-based power | 1 | 4 | – | – | 1 | – | 2 | 4 |
| Other | 1 | 1 | 4 | – | 1 | – | 6 | 1 |
| Total Power Generation | 37 | 47 | 54 | 48 | 2 | 0 | 93 | 95 |
| Heat | ||||||||
| Fossil-based heat | 55 | 30 | 4 | 2 | 31 | 17 | 90 | 49 |
| Renewable | 18 | – | 53 | 87 | 7 | – | 78 | 87 |
| District heating | 19 | 4 | 79 | 31 | 28 | 13 | 126 | 48 |
| Other | – | – | 12 | – | 3 | – | 15 | 0 |
| Total Heat | 92 | 34 | 148 | 120 | 69 | 30 | 309 | 184 |
| Distribution | 62 | 53 | 163 | 120 | 11 | 10 | 236 | 183 |
| Markets | 1 | – | 2 | 8 | – | – | 3 | 8 |
| Other | 11 | 12 | 3 | 3 | – | – | 14 | 15 |
| Total | 203 | 146 | 370 | 299 | 82 | 40 | 655 | 485 |
1) Includes capital expenditure to both intangible assets and property, plant and equipment.
Maintenance investments during 2007 in property, plant and equipment were EUR 144 million (2006: 180 million). Investments due to requirements of legislation were EUR 106 million (2006:102 million). Investments increasing productivity were EUR 195 million (2006: 144 million) and growth investments were EUR 210 million (2006: 59 million).
In 2007 Fortum invested into several hydro growth projects, the biggest of these was Avestaforsen amounting to some EUR 8 million (2006: 17 million), the total project amounts to some EUR 40 million over five years. The new Avestaforsen power plant was commissioned in October 2007. In Finland, Fortum invested some EUR 32 million into the Loviisa nuclear power plant. Additionally this segment has invested some EUR 50 million into refurbishment type investments; this investment level is the same as in 2006.
Four new CHP plant investments were started in 2007 by Fortum. The already ongoing projects are the new natural gas-fired Suomenoja plant in Espoo, Finland, the Częstochowa plant in Poland and the Tartu, Estonia plant, of which Fortum has a 60% stake. Preparatory works of the new bio-mass fueled Värtan CHP plant in Stockholm were commenced. In total growth investments in this segment amount to some 170 million euros, which is about three times the amount compared to 2006. Refurbishment and other investments are over EUR 130 million in this segment, which is roughly the same figure as in 2006. This amount consists mainly of investments in district heat networks, new connections as well as the maintenance of existing CHP plants.
In 2006 Fortum started the large-scale Automatic Meter Management (AMM) project in Sweden. This project is planned to go on into 2009, and is the largest capital expenditure project (excluding acquisitions) in the Distribution Segment. During 2007 almost 300 thousand automatic meters were installed. In 2007 Fortum invested
some EUR 64 million into this project (2006: 15 million). Another major project in Fortum's Distribution segment is the Reliability Investment Program, which was also started in 2006. This investment aims to improve the reliability of power delivery in e.g. storms. In 2007 Fortum invested some EUR 30 million into this program. In addition to these two main projects, Fortum has invested some EUR 140 million of maintenance type investments into the Distribution businesses in Finland, Sweden, Norway and Estonia. This is some EUR 10 million more than in 2006.
| EUR million | 2007 | 2006 |
|---|---|---|
| Acquisition cost | 39 | 63 |
| Accumulated depreciation | –9 | –17 |
| Carrying amount | 30 | 46 |
The assets leased by financial lease agreements are classified as machinery and equipment.
Fortum acts also as a lessor and has leased out property, plant and equipment for EUR 88 million (2006: 97 million), which are not included in property, plant and equipment in the consolidated financial statements.
Cumulative capitalised borrowing costs included in the carrying amount in machinery and equipment were EUR 17 million in 2007 (2006: 19 million). New borrowing costs of EUR 1 million were capitalised in 2007 for Polish Częstochowa and Finnish Suomenoja CHPplant-projects. The interest rate used for capitalisation was 4.2%. There were no capitalised borrowing costs recorded in 2006.
| EUR million | 2007 | 2006 |
|---|---|---|
| Historical cost | ||
| On 1 January | 1,498 | 1,406 |
| Exchange rate differences and other adjustments | –4 | –29 |
| Acquisitions | 1 | 124 |
| New share issues and shareholders' contributions | 294 | – |
| Increase through acquisition of subsidiaries | – | 2 |
| Divestments | –68 | –5 |
| Historical cost on 31 December | 1,721 | 1,498 |
| Equity adjustments to Investments in associates and joint ventures | ||
| On 1 January | 699 | 204 |
| Exchange rate differences and other adjustments | –2 | 33 |
| Share of profits of associates | 241 | 69 |
| Dividends received | –178 | –39 |
| Fair-value adjustments in equity | 372 | 432 |
| Equity adjustments on 31 December | 1,132 | 699 |
| Carrying amount on 31 December | 2,853 | 2,197 |
The carrying amounts of investments in associated companies include publicly listed shares for EUR 1,654 million (2006: 1,026 million). The fair value, based on market quotations, of those investments was EUR 2,151 million (2006: 1,696 million). Fortum owns shares in three (2006: three) companies classified as joint ventures. The total carrying value of these joint ventures was EUR 61 million (2006: 63 million).
No major acquisitions were made in 2007. Acquisitions in 2006 mainly comprise acquisition of additional 12.5% of the shares in St. Petersburg Generating Company, see below information regarding Territorial Generating Company 1 "TGC-1" and Lenenergo.
In September 2007 Fortum participated in the share issue of Russian Territorial Generating Company 1 (TGC-1) subscribing to 243,691,499,640 new shares in the company. At 0.035 rubles per share, the total value of Fortum's subscription was approximately 8.5 billion rubles or EUR 243 million. With this subscription, Fortum maintained its 25.7% stake in TGC-1 and its position as the second largest shareholder of the company.
In 2007, Fortum also participated in the share issue of Teollisuuden Voima Oy (TVO) with a total amount of EUR 49 million. Olkiluoto 3, the nuclear power plant being built by TVO, is funded through external loans, share issues and shareholder loans according shareholder agreement between the owners of TVO.
In August 2007 Fortum sold its 35%-shareholding in JSC Lenenergo, an electricity distribution company in the City of St. Petersburg and the Leningrad Region. A capital gain of EUR 232 million was recorded. The selling was in line with Fortum's strategy to invest in Russian generation assets. The divestments in 2006 included
the shares in Sölvesborgs Fjärrvärme AB and Karskär Energi AB in Sweden and Enprima Oy and Enermet Oy, Finland.
When calculating the share of profits in Fortum's associated company Hafslund ASA, Fortum has in accordance with Fortum's accounting policies, reclassified Hafslund's accounting treatment for the shareholding in REC. Hafslund has classified the shareholding in REC as financial assets at fair value through profit and loss, while Fortum has classified the REC shareholding as available for sale financial assets with fair value changes directly through equity. Only if Hafslund would divest shares in REC would the cumulative fair value change effect Fortum's income statement. Since REC is listed in the Oslo stock exchange, Fortum is accounting for the fair value change in price in Oslo stock exchange at each closing date. The amount of shares is based on the amount published by Hafslund in the previous quarter if other information is not available.
Hafslund sold approximately one third of its holdings in Renewable Energy Corporation (REC) in March 2007. As a consequence Fortum booked a gain of EUR 180 million as share of profits of associates due to the accounting policies following. According to Fortum group accounting policies, the share of profits from Hafslund has been included in Fortum Group figures based on the previous quarter information.
Dividends received include dividend from Hafslund amounting to EUR 145 million (2006: 19 million).
The cumulative fair value change booked in Fortum's equity and based on the remaining number of shares reported by Hafslund was approximately EUR 790 million at the end of the year 2007 (2006: 440 million). See Note 45 Events after the balance sheet date.
Fortum Corporation Annual Report 2007 – Financials
| EUR million | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Company | Segment | Domicile | Participation in % | Book value in Group | |||
| 2007 | 2006 | 2007 | 2006 | ||||
| Kemijoki Oy | Power Generation | Finland | 18 | 18 | 256 | 266 | |
| Hafslund ASA | Power Generation | Norway | 34 | 34 | 1,202 | 750 | |
| Teollisuuden Voima Oy (TVO) | Power Generation | Finland | 26 | 26 | 238 | 199 | |
| OKG AB | Power Generation | Sweden | 46 | 46 | 85 | 94 | |
| Forsmarks Kraftgrupp AB | Power Generation | Sweden | 26 | 26 | 86 | 94 | |
| Territorial Generating Company 1 (TGC-1) | Power Generation | Russia | 26 | 26 | 452 | 207 | |
| Gasum Oy | Heat | Finland | 31 | 31 | 111 | 105 | |
| Fingrid Oyj | Distribution | Finland | 25 | 25 | 102 | 91 | |
| JSC Lenenergo | Distribution | Russia | – | 35 | – | 66 | |
| Total | 2,532 | 1,872 | |||||
| Others | 321 | 325 | |||||
| Carrying amount of associated companies at 31 December | 2,853 | 2,197 |
The Group's interest in associated companies is accounted by equity method. Assets acquired and liabilities assumed in the investment in associates are measured initially at their fair value at the acquisition date. The Group's share of its associated companies profit or loss and expenses related to the adjustments to fair values of the assets and liabilities assumed, is recognised in the income statement. Accounting policies of the associated companies have been changed where necessary to ensure consistency with Fortum's accounting policies.
Fair value, based on market quotations of listed principal associated companies 31 December (Hafslund ASA and TGC-1 in 2007 and also Lenenergo in 2006) was EUR 2,151 million (2006: 1,665 million).
Fortum owns 63.8% of the hydro shares and 15.4% of the monetary shares in Kemijoki Oy. Each owner of hydro shares is entitled to the hydro power production in proportion to its hydro shareholding. Fortum's total ownership is 17.5% of the share capital. Since Fortum has significant influence due to its representation on the board of directors and participation in policy-making processes, Kemijoki Oy is accounted for as an associated company.
TVO has three series of shares which entitles the shareholders to electricity produced in the different power plants owned by TVO. Series A entitles to electricity produced in nuclear power plants Olkiluoto 1 and 2, series B entitles to electricity in the nuclear power plant presently being built, Olkiluoto 3, and series C to electricity
produced in TVO's share of the thermal power plant Meri-Pori. The Meri-Pori power plant is a jointly controlled asset between Fortum and TVO. Fortum accounts for its 54.55% of the assets and TVO for 45.45%. See also jointly controlled assets in Note 1 Accounting principles.
JSC Lenenergo carried out a spin-off in October 2005. The company was divided into five separate companies according to business line. The distribution business (less than 110 kV) remained in JSC Lenenergo. Fortum sold the shares in Lenenergo in August 2007. The electricity generation as well as heat production and sales in Lenenergo were transferred to St. Petersburg Generating Company. In October 2006, Fortum acquired additional 12.5% of the shares in St. Petersburg Generating Company. Fortum's ownership in St. Petersburg Generating Company after the acquisition of additional shares amounted to 43.5% of the shares and 39.7% of the votes. In November 2006, St. Petersburg Generating Company, JSC Kola Generation Company, JSC Karelenerogeneratsiya and JSC Apatity CHPP merged to form Territorial Generating Company 1, TGC-1. As a result of the merger, Fortum received 25.7% of the shares and votes in TGC-1. Through Fortum's participation in the share issue in TGC-1 in 2007, Fortum still owns 25.7% of the shares and votes in the company.
| EUR million | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2007 | Domicile | Assets | Liabilities | Sales | Profit/loss | ownership, % | votes, % |
| Kemijoki Oy 1) 4) | Finland | 415 | 272 | 39 | –6 | 18 | 18 |
| Hafslund ASA 2) | Norway | 5,047 | 1,863 | 813 | 1,349 | 34 | 33 |
| Teollisuuden Voima Oy (TVO) 2) | Finland | 2,817 | 2,348 | 165 | 0 | 26 | 26 |
| OKG AB 1) 4) | Sweden | 1,354 | 1,202 | 402 | 1 | 46 | 46 |
| Forsmarks Kraftgrupp AB 1) 4) | Sweden | 1,155 | 1,025 | 442 | 1 | 26 | 26 |
| Territorial Generating Company 1 (TGC-1) 4) Russia | 1,024 | 340 | 616 | 44 | 26 | 26 | |
| Gasum Oy 3) | Finland | 540 | 188 | 420 | 35 | 31 | 31 |
| Fingrid Oyj 2) | Finland | 1,540 | 1,130 | 234 | 30 | 25 | 33 |
1) Power plants are often built jointly with other power producers. Under the consortium agreements, each owner is entitled to electricity in proportion to its share of ownership or other agreements and each owner is liable for an equivalent portion of costs. The associated companies are not profit making, since the owners purchase electricity at production cost including interest cost and income taxes. (Note 44 Related party transactions)
2) Based on September 2007 figures.
3) Based on June 2007 figures. Gasum Oy reports profit before taxes. The figure has been decreased with nominal tax 26% in this table.
4) Based on December 2006 figures.
Some of the principal associates present their financial statements according to local accounting principles. Fortum makes adjustments to the reported numbers to ensure consistency with policies adopted by the Group. If information is not available, the share of profit of associated companies is based on the previous quarterly information.
Regarding the Swedish associated nuclear companies, Forsmarks Kraftgrupp AB and OKG AB, Fortum has not been able to do adjustments regarding the changes in nuclear related assets and liabilities. For further information see Note 37 Nuclear related assets and liabilities.
Fortum has chosen to account for TGC-1 based mainly on historical cost and not equity accounting. TGC-1 has published 2006 IFRS Financial Statements, but Fortum will apply equity accounting only when IFRS financial information is published on a regular basis. Management believes that the impact on Fortum's income statement would not be material if equity accounting would be used. Market value for TGC-1 EUR 847 million, based on market quotation, exceeds the carrying amount, EUR 452 million, with EUR 395 million on 31 December 2007.
| EUR million | 2007 | 2006 |
|---|---|---|
| Sales to associated companies | 129 | 101 |
| Interest on associated company loan receivables | 26 | 20 |
| Purchases from associated companies | 519 | 487 |
Purchases from associated companies are purchases of nuclear- and hydro power at production costs (Note 44 Related party transactions)
| EUR million | 2007 | 2006 |
|---|---|---|
| Receivables from Associated Companies | ||
| Long-term interest-bearing loan receivables | 636 | 575 |
| Trade receivables | 17 | 28 |
| Other receivables | 7 | 7 |
| Liabilities to Associated Companies | ||
| Long-term loan payables | 171 | 164 |
| Trade payables | 25 | 12 |
| Other payables | 53 | 23 |
Long-term interest bearing receivables are mainly from Swedish nuclear companies, OKG AB and Forsmarks Kraftgrupp AB EUR 567 million (2006: 504 million).
Investments in Swedish nuclear companies are financed through loans from owners of the nuclear companies, pro rata ownership.
| EUR million | 2007 | 2006 |
|---|---|---|
| Purchases | 1 | 1 |
| Receivables from joint ventures | 3 | 3 |
There were no outstanding loans receivable from joint ventures on 31 December 2007 or 2006.
| EUR million | 2007 | 2006 |
|---|---|---|
| Available for sale financial assets | 42 | 62 |
| Defined benefit pension asset1) | 14 | 0 |
| Other | 43 | 39 |
| Total | 99 | 101 |
1) For further information, please see Note 36.
Available for sale financial assets, i.e. shares which are not classified as associated companies or joint ventures, consists mainly of shares in unlisted companies of EUR 42 million (2006: 39 million), for which the fair value can not be reliably determined. These assets are measured at cost less possible impairment.
Available for sale financial assets include listed shares at fair value of EUR 0 million (2006: 23 million). Fortum sold in October 2007 the shares in Wholesale Generating Company 5 (WGC-5) which were purchased in the end of 2006 for EUR 17 million.
The cumulative fair value change booked in Fortum's equity was EUR 0 million (2006: 6 million).
Fortum Corporation Annual Report 2007 – Financials
| EUR million | 2007 | 2006 |
|---|---|---|
| Long-term loan receivables | 648 | 582 |
| Finance lease receivables | 88 | 98 |
| Total long-term interest-bearing receivables | 736 | 680 |
| Other short-term interest-bearing receivables | 10 | 12 |
| Short-term finance lease receivables | 1 | 1 |
| Total short-term interest-bearing receivables 1) | 11 | 13 |
| Total interest-bearing receivables | 747 | 693 |
1) Included in trade and other receivables in balance sheet.
Long-term loan receivables include receivables from associated companies EUR 636 million (2006: 575 million), mainly from Swedish nuclear companies, OKG AB and Forsmarks Kraftgrupp AB EUR 567 million (2006: 504 million). These companies are mainly funded with shareholder loans, pro rata each shareholders' ownership.
Long-term loan receivables also include receivables from Teollisuuden Voima Oy (TVO) amounting to EUR 45 million (2006: 45 million). Olkiluoto 3, the nuclear power plant being built by the associated company TVO, is funded through external loans, share issues and shareholder loans according shareholder agreement between the owners of TVO.
| Effective | Carrying | Repricing | Repricing | Repricing | Fair | Carrying | Fair | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| interest | amount | under | 1–5 years | over | value | amount | value | |
| EUR million | rate | 2007 | 1 year | 5 years | 2007 | 2006 | 2006 | |
| Long-term loan receivables | 4.6 | 648 | 645 | 1 | 2 | 657 | 591 | 606 |
| Leasing receivables | 6.5 | 88 | 54 | 7 | 27 | 103 | 99 | 114 |
| Total long-term interest-bearing receivables 1) | 4.8 | 736 | 699 | 8 | 29 | 760 | 690 | 720 |
| Other current receivables | 6.1 | 11 | 11 | – | – | 11 | 3 | 3 |
| Total interest-bearing receivables | 4.8 | 747 | 710 | 8 | 29 | 771 | 693 | 723 |
1) Including current portion of long-term receivables
Fortum held 31 December 2007 mortgage as collateral for other interest-bearing receivables amounting to EUR 11 million.
Fortum owns assets (mainly CHP- and heating plants) that it leases to customers under financial leasing agreements in Finland, Sweden and Estonia. These assets are recorded at the gross investment cost
in the lease, less unearned financial income. The average lease term is approximately 6 years. Of all contracts, 4.9 percent carry a floating interest rate and 95.1 percent a fixed rate.
| EUR million | 2007 | 2006 |
|---|---|---|
| Gross investment in finance lease contracts | 118 | 130 |
| Less unearned finance income | 29 | 31 |
| Present value of future minimum lease payment receivables | 89 | 99 |
| EUR million | 2007 | 2006 |
|---|---|---|
| Gross investment | ||
| Less than 1 year | 16 | 15 |
| 1–5 years | 73 | 64 |
| Over 5 years | 29 | 51 |
| Total | 118 | 130 |
| EUR million | 2007 | 2006 |
|---|---|---|
| Less than 1 year | 11 | 10 |
| 1–5 years | 55 | 47 |
| Over 5 years | 23 | 42 |
| Total | 89 | 99 |
| Contingent rents recognised in income statement | 0 | 1 |
Fortum has leased out its 308-MW share of the Meri-Pori power plant from January 2007 to the end of June 2010. The rental income recognised in the income statement was EUR 25 million (2006: 0 million).
| EUR million | 2007 | 2006 |
|---|---|---|
| Gross investment | ||
| Less than 1 year | 25 | – |
| 1–5 years | 37 | – |
| Over 5 years | – | – |
| Total | 62 | – |
| EUR million | 2007 | 2006 |
|---|---|---|
| Nuclear fuel | 61 | 56 |
| Coal | 76 | 104 |
| Oil | 36 | 58 |
| Biofuels | 60 | 81 |
| Other inventories | 52 | 30 |
| Total | 285 | 329 |
No impairment costs have been booked related to inventories neither in 2007 or 2006.
| EUR million | 2007 | 2006 |
|---|---|---|
| Trade receivables | 840 | 847 |
| Income tax receivables | 37 | 26 |
| Accrued interest income | 2 | 1 |
| Accrued income and prepaid expenses | 52 | 67 |
| Other receivables | 92 | 98 |
| Finance lease receivables | 1 | 1 |
| Other interest-bearing receivables | 10 | 12 |
| Total | 1,034 | 1,052 |
The management consider that the carrying amount of trade and other receivables approximates their fair value.
| EUR million | 2007 | 2006 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross | Impaired | Gross | Impaired | ||
| Not past due | 805 | 787 | |||
| Past due 1–90 days | 31 | 49 | |||
| Past due 91–180 days | 4 | 6 | 1 | ||
| Past due more than 181 days | 23 | 23 | 37 | 31 | |
| Total | 863 | 23 | 879 | 32 |
| EUR million | 2007 | 2006 |
|---|---|---|
| EUR | 268 | 278 |
| SEK | 500 | 519 |
| NOK | 35 | 34 |
| USD | 1 | 1 |
| PLN | 30 | 27 |
| Other | 29 | 20 |
| Total | 863 | 879 |
Trade receivables are arising from large number of customers mainly in EUR and SEK mitigating the concentration of risk. Fortum held 31 December 2007 bank guarantee as collateral for trade
receivables amounting to EUR 10 million. Impairment losses recognised in income statement were EUR 2 million (2006: 4 million).
Fortum Corporation Annual Report 2007 – Financials
| EUR million | 2007 | 2006 |
|---|---|---|
| Cash at bank and in hand | 100 | 157 |
| Short-term bank deposits | 327 | – |
| Total | 427 | 157 |
Maturity of cash and cash equivalents is under 3 months.
| Number of | Share | |
|---|---|---|
| EUR million | shares | capital |
| Registered shares at 1 January 2007 | 887,393,646 | 3,023 |
| Shares subscribed with options and registered by 31 Dec 2007 | 5,199,412 | 17 |
| Cancellation of own shares | –5,910,000 | – |
| Registered shares at 31 December 2007 | 886,683,058 | 3,040 |
| Unregistered shares | 50,000 | |
| Number of | Share | |
| EUR million | shares | capital |
| Registered shares at 1 January 2006 | 875,294,025 | 2,976 |
| Shares subscribed with options and registered by 31 Dec 2006 | 13,759,621 | 47 |
| Cancellation of own shares | –1,660,000 | – |
| Registered shares at 31 December 2006 | 887,393,646 | 3,023 |
| Unregistered shares | 74,700 |
Fortum has one class of shares. By the end of 2007, a total of 886,683,058 shares had been issued. The nominal value of the shares is EUR 3.40 and each share entitles the holder to one vote at the Annual General Meeting. All shares entitle holders to an equal dividend. At the end of 2007 Fortum Corporation's share capital, paid in its entirety and entered in the trade register, was EUR 3,040,460,397.20.
Fortum Corporation's shares are listed on OMX Nordic Exchange Helsinki. The trading code is FUM1V. Fortum Corporation's shares are in the Finnish book entry system maintained by the Finnish Central Securities Depository Ltd.
At the beginning of 2007, the Finnish State owned 50.82% of the Company's shares. After the changes in amount of shares during 2007, increase in amount of shares due to the share subscriptions under share option schemes for key employees and decrease due to the cancellation of repurchased shares, the Finnish State owned 50.86% of the company's shares at the end of the year. The Finnish Parliament has authorised the Government to reduce the Finnish State's holding in Fortum Corporation to no less than 50.1% of the share capital and voting rights.
At the end of 2007, The President and CEO and other members of the Fortum management team owned 317,030 (338,000) shares, representing less than 0.04% of the shares in the Company.
A full description of Fortum's equity incentive schemes is shown in Note 31 together with details on The President and CEO and other members of the Fortum Management Team's shareholdings and interest in the equity incentive schemes. A description of shares, share capital and shareholders in Fortum is shown in the Operating and financial review.
Fortum Corporation's Annual General Meeting held on 28 March 2007 authorised the Board of Directors to decide on repurchasing the company's own shares by using funds available for distribution of profit.
The authorisation is valid for one year from the date of the decision of the Annual General Meeting. The maximum amount of shares to be repurchased is 20 million. In addition, the amount of funds used for the repurchases may not exceed EUR 300 million. The maximum amount of shares to be repurchased corresponds to approximately two per cent of the share capital of the company and the total voting rights.
The shares will be repurchased through public trading of securities on OMX Nordic Exchange Helsinki at the market price of the shares at the time of the repurchase. The repurchases shall be carried out and settled according to the Rules of OMX Nordic Exchange Helsinki and the Rules of the Finnish Central Securities Depository.
Shares repurchased by the company shall be cancelled either by decreasing the share capital through decision made by a General Meeting of Shareholders or without decreasing the share capital through a decision of the Board of Directors. The repurchase will reduce the company's distributable retained earnings but will not have a material impact on the division of the ownership of the shares and the voting rights.
Total amount of shares repurchased during the year was 5,910,000 (2006: 1,660,000) and the cost was EUR 175 million (2006: 30 million). In December 2007 the Board of Directors decided to cancel the total amount of repurchased shares without decreasing the share capital. The cancellation was entered in the Trade Register on 20 December 2007.
Fortum Corporation has issued no other convertible bonds or bonds with attached warrants, which would entitle the bearer to subscribe for Fortum shares. The Board of Directors of Fortum Corporation has today no unused authorisations from the General Meeting of shareholders to issue convertible bond loans or bonds with warrants or increase the company's share capital.
| Net | Hedging Share-based | AFS 1) | Other fair | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EUR million | investment | reserve | payments | value changes | ||
| Balance at 31 December 2006 | 17 | 50 | 10 | 446 | –12 | 511 |
| Cash flow hedges | ||||||
| Fair value gains/losses in period | – | –165 | – | – | – | –165 |
| Tax on fair value gains/losses | – | 46 | – | – | – | 46 |
| Transfers to income statement | – | –69 | – | – | – | –69 |
| Tax on transfers to income statement | – | 18 | – | – | – | 18 |
| Net investment hedge | 2 | – | – | – | – | 2 |
| Tax on net investment hedge | – | – | – | – | – | 0 |
| Share-based payments | – | – | 6 | – | – | 6 |
| Other equity changes in associates and available for sale financial assets |
– | – | – | 347 | 19 | 366 |
| Balance at 31 December 2007 | 19 | –120 | 16 | 793 | 7 | 715 |
| Net | Hedging Share-based | AFS 1) | Other fair | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EUR million | investment | reserve | payments | value changes | ||
| Balance at 31 December 2005 | 20 | –151 | 16 | 0 | –2 | –117 |
| Cash flow hedges | ||||||
| Fair value gains/losses in period | – | 103 | – | – | – | 103 |
| Tax on fair value gains/losses | – | –27 | – | – | – | –27 |
| Transfers to income statement | – | 170 | – | – | – | 170 |
| Tax on transfers to income statement | – | –45 | – | – | – | –45 |
| Net investment hedge | –4 | – | – | – | – | –4 |
| Tax on net investment hedge | 1 | – | – | – | – | 1 |
| Share-based payments | – | – | 6 | – | – | 6 |
| Other equity changes in associates and available for sale | ||||||
| financial assets | – | – | – | 446 | –10 | 436 |
| Change in the recognition of performance share agreement 2) | – | – | –12 | – | – | –12 |
| Balance at 31 December 2006 | 17 | 50 | 10 | 446 | –12 | 511 |
1) Available for sale financial assets (AFS)
2) Share performance arrangement was in 2006 officially decided to be cash-settled, which has had an impact on the accounting treatment.
Fair value changes for available for sale financial assets include the fair value change of the Renewable Energy Corporation (REC) shareholding in Hafslund, (see Note 23 Investments in associated companies and joint ventures) and the fair value change on Fortum's own shareholdings in available for sale financial assets (see Note 24 Other long-term investments).
| EUR million | 2007 | 2006 |
|---|---|---|
| Included in operating profit | –81 | 174 |
| Included in financial costs | 12 | –4 |
| Total cash flow hedges – amounts moved from equity to income statement | –69 | 170 |
Fortum's short-term incentive system (called annual bonus below) exists to support the Group's values, the achievement of financial targets and structural changes, as well as to secure an alignment between the performance targets of the individual employee and the targets of his/her Business Unit and the Corporation. The big majority of Fortum employees are covered by an annual performance bonus system.
The criteria used in determining the size of the bonus for senior management is decided annually by the Board of Directors on the recommendation of the Board's Nomination and Compensation Committee. The President and CEO as well as the Fortum Management Team are paid annual performance bonuses in addition to their salary and fringe benefits. The size of each senior executive's annual bonus is dependent on the Group's financial performance, as well as on their own success in reaching their individual goals. If the financial targets and goals are met, each senior executive receives a 25% bonus. The maximum bonus level, in the case all targets and goals are exceeded, is 40% of the person's annual salary including fringe benefits.
For executives with business unit responsibilities, the scheme is structured to reflect also the performance of their business unit as well as the Group. The criteria for evaluating an executive's personal performance are mutually agreed between the executive and his/her superior in an annual performance discussion at the beginning of each year. For further information on bonus costs for management, see Note 14 Management Remuneration and Employee Costs.
Fortum Corporation Annual Report 2007 – Financials
The Fortum Personnel Fund (for employees in Finland only) has been in operation since 2000. The Board of Directors determines the criteria for the fund's annual profit-sharing bonus. Members of the personnel fund are the permanent and fixed-term employees of the Group. Persons included in the Performance Share Arrangement are not eligible to be members of this fund. The membership of employees joining the company starts at the beginning of the next month after the employment relationship has been ongoing for six months. Fund membership terminates when the member has received his/her share of the fund in full.
The profit-sharing received by the fund is distributed equally between the members. Each employee's share is divided into a restricted amount and an amount available for withdrawal. Employees can decide whether to withdraw their share of the profit in cash or in Fortum shares. It is possible to transfer a maximum of 15% of capital from the tied amount to the amount available for withdrawal each year, once the employee has been a member for five years.
The amount available for withdrawal is decided each year and it is paid to members who want to exercise their withdrawal rights. Since 2005, employees have had the choice of having the amount paid in Fortum shares acquired by the personnel fund.
The fund's latest financial year ended at 30 April 2007 and the fund then had a total of 3,491 members. At the end of April 2007 Fortum contributed EUR 4.6 million to the personnel fund as an annual profit-sharing bonus based on the financial results of 2006. The combined amount of members' shares in the fund was EUR 27.8 million.
The contribution to the personnel fund is expensed as it is earned.
Fortum's Long-Term Management Performance Share Arrangement (LTI) for key personnel was launched in 2003 to support the achievement of the Group's long-term goals by attracting and retaining key personnel. The LTI arrangement is a performance-based long-term incentive arrangement intended for the top management and key personnel of the Fortum Group. A new performance share plan (LTI plan) under the arrangement starts annually if approved by the Board of Directors and runs for a six-year period. At present, approximately 150 managers, all of whom have been elected by the Board of Directors, are participants in at least one of six on-going LTI plans. The 2006–2011 LTI plan is for non-share option holders only. At the end of 2006, approximately 120 persons were approved by the Board of Directors to participate for the year 2007 in LTI plans that have ongoing earning periods in 2007. The potential reward of the performance share arrangement is based on the performance of the Group, its business units and the individual participant as well as appreciation of the Fortum share.
Each LTI plan comprises of two three-year periods following each other. The plan starts with a three-year earning period, during which the person earns annual bonus based on the performance of the Group, the relevant Business Unit and the achievements of the individual participant. The grant date when the amount of the potential reward as a calculative amount of share rights is decided is determined by the Board of Directors following the announcement of the Group's annual results for the last calendar year after the earning period has ended. The maximum value in share rights a participant can be granted after the three years earning period cannot at the grant date exceed the participant's one-year salary including fringe benefits.
The earning period is followed by an approximately three year restriction period which ends at the cash-settlement of the earned reward provided that the participant remains employed by the Group. The potential reward under each annual LTI plan is adjusted during the restriction period by potential dividends paid up until the settlement date, which takes place at the end of the restriction period. The participant has approved that the earned reward will be used to acquire Fortum shares in the name of the participant deducted by the income tax and the statutory employment related expenses and insurance contributions payable by the participant on the reward.
The first annual share plan began in 2003 (based on 2002 financial results). At the end of 2007 six LTI plans were running. The earning period of LTI plans 2002–2007, 2003–2008 and 2004–2010 had ended and the amount of potential reward in the form of calculative share rights had been determined in the spring 2005, 2006 and 2007 for these plans. The restriction period for LTI plan 2005–2011 ended at the end of 2007. The other plans were still on their earning period.
In their meeting on the 30 January 2008 the Board of Directors of Fortum Corporation has decided to establish a new share-based longterm incentive (LTI) arrangement for Fortum Group's management and other key personnel valid from the beginning of 2008. The new arrangement will replace the Group's current long-term performance share arrangement. The final terms and conditions of the new LTI arrangement will be decided later in 2008.
From 2006 onwards the LTI arrangement is treated as a cash settled arrangement instead of an equity settled arrangement. The total LTI liability including provisions for social charges at the end of the year 2007 was EUR 37 million (2006: 29 million). The expense recorded in the personnel costs for the period was EUR 7 million (2006: 2 million) netted with the change in the fair values of the hedge arrangements.
In order to hedge the Group against the changes in the fair values of the potential rewards the Group has entered into share forward transactions which are settled in cash. The change during the year 2007 in the fair values of the hedge arrangements for the 2002–2007, 2003–2008 and 2004–2010 plans amounted to EUR 18 million (2006: 10 million). The change is netting personnel expenses with a corresponding entry in the long-term receivables.
| Number of | Payments | Periodised expenses | Total expenses | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Incentive period | participants | in EUR thousand | in EUR thousand | in EUR thousand |
| Plan 2002–2007 | 118 | 312 | 15,353 | 15,665 |
| Plan 2003–2008 | 136 | 130 | 9,066 | 9,196 |
| Plan 2004–2009 | 133 | 93 | 5,560 | 5,653 |
| Plan 2005–2010 | 127 | – | 3,757 | 3,757 |
| Plan 2006–2011 | 18 | – | 75 | 75 |
| Plan 2007–2012 | 117 | – | 654 | 654 |
| Total | 535 | 34,465 | 35,000 |
The fair value of the potential reward is measured based on the market value of Fortum share at each closing date and at the grant date taking into account the estimated departures. The changes of the fair values of the potential rewards are accrued over the remaining vesting period.
| Incentive period | Grant date | Maximum number of share rights at the grant date |
Fair value of share rights on the grant date in EUR |
Total initial fair value in EUR thousand |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Plan 2002–2007 | 11.2.2005 | 573,885 | 14.51 | 8,327 |
| Plan 2003–2008 | 13.2.2006 | 514,903 | 19.07 | 9,819 |
| Plan 2004–2009 | 8.2.2007 | 496,362 | 20.99 | 10,417 |
The calculative share rights with adjustment for dividends and after taxes (assumed tax deduction of 56%) that the President and CEO and other members of the Fortum Management Team will receive in 2009 and 2010 are at 31 December as follows. For 2008 the number of shares represents the actual number of shares to be delivered in February 2008.
| Name | Year 2008 | Year 2009 | Year 2010 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mikael Frisk | 10,450 | 5,389 | 4,772 |
| Timo Karttinen | 8,622 | 4,477 | 4,081 |
| Tapio Kuula | 14,415 | 7,511 | 6,653 |
| Juha Laaksonen | 12,010 | 6,384 | 5,654 |
| Mikael Lilius | 36,756 | 19,804 | 17,773 |
| Christian Lundberg | 10,762 | 6,730 | 6,191 |
| Maria Paatero-Kaarnakari (from 1 September 2007) | 3,721 | 2,384 | 2,089 |
| Maria Romantschuk (from 1 September 2007) | – | – | – |
| Carola Teir-Lehtinen (until 31 August 2007) | 7,854 | 4,174 | 3,696 |
In March 2002, a resolution was passed to issue a maximum of 25,000,000 stock options to key employees of the Fortum Group and to a wholly owned subsidiary of Fortum Corporation. Of the total number of stock options, 12,500,000 were marked with the letter A and were exercisable from 1 October 2004 through 1 May 2007, and 12,500,000 are marked with the letter B and are exercisable from 1 October 2006 through 1 May 2009. The Board of Directors could distribute stock options to the key personnel, only if the increase in Fortum Group's earnings per share (EPS) was at least five percent compared with the preceding period. The proportion of the annual maximum amount that became available for distribution was influenced by the Company's relative share price development compared to the European Utilities Index during a period of twelve calendar months preceding the month that the stock options were distributed.
The total number of stock options marked with a letter A listed on 1 October 2004 was 10,767,000. Each stock warrant entitled the holder to subscribe for one share. The warrants were exercisable during the period from 1 October 2004 through to 30 April 2007. By the end of the option 2002 A scheme in April 2007, a total of 10,767,000 shares were subscribed for and entered into the trade register. This scheme covered some 350 persons.
The total number of stock options marked with a letter B listed on 2 October 2006 was 10,003,000. Each stock warrant entitles the holder to subscribe for one share. The warrants are exercisable during the period from 2 October 2006 to 30 April 2009. By the end of 2007, a total of 8,319,013 shares were subscribed for and entered into the trade register with the stock options marked with a letter B. At the end of 2007 total of 1,683,987 shares could still have been registered with the stock options 2002B such that the share capital is increased by a maximum of EUR 5,725,555.80, which corresponds to 0.2% of the share capital at the end of 2007. At the end of 2007, the subscription price of the stock options marked with the letter B was EUR 3.40. This scheme covered some 350 persons.
The entitlement of the shares subscribed for with the 2002A or B options to dividend, and other shareholder rights, will commence once the increase in the share capital has been registered. The stock options are freely transferable, when the relevant share subscription period has commenced.
In 2001, a resolution was passed to issue a maximum of 24,000,000 stock options to key employees of the Fortum Group and to a wholly owned subsidiary of Fortum Corporation. Of the total number of stock options, 8,000,000 were marked with the letter A and were exercisable from 15 October 2005 through to 1 May 2007, 8,000,000 were marked with the letter B and were exercisable from 15 January 2006 through to 1 May 2007 and 8,000,000 were marked with the letter C and would have been exercisable from 15 April 2006 through to 1 May 2007. A total of 3,062,500 non-transferred stock options marked with the letter A were annulled, a total of 1,300,000 non-transferred stock options marked with the letter B were annulled, and all of the 8,000,000 non-transferred stock options marked with the letter C were annulled.
The preconditions for the stock option scheme 2001 A were met and a total number of stock options marked with a letter A were listed on 17 October 2005 was 4,937,500. Each stock warrant entitled the holder to subscribe for one share. The warrants were exercisable during the period from 17 October 2005 through to 1 May 2007. By the end of the option scheme in April 2007, a total of 4,937,470 shares were subscribed for and entered into the trade register with the stock options marked with a letter A.
The preconditions for the stock option scheme 2001 B were also met and the subscription period and listing of options marked with letter B started on 16 January 2006. The number of options listed was 6,700,000. By the end of the option scheme in April 2007, a total of 6,700,000 shares were subscribed and entered into the trade register with the stock options marked with a letter B.
The entitlement of the shares subscribed for with the options to dividend, and other shareholder rights, will commence once the increase in the share capital has been registered. The stock options are freely transferable, when the relevant share subscription period has commenced. This scheme covered approximately 350 persons.
Movements in the number of share options outstanding and their related weighted average exercise prices are as follows
| 2007 | 2006 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Weighted | Number Weighted |
Number | ||
| average | of | average | of | |
| exercise | options | exercise | options | |
| price, EUR | (thousand) | price, EUR | (thousand) | |
| Outstanding at the beginning of the period | 3.40 | 6,883 | 3.40 | 20,664 |
| Granted during the period | – | – | – | – |
| Forfeited during the period | – | – | 3.40 | 21 |
| Exercised during the period | 3.40 | 5,199 | 3.40 | 13,760 |
| Expired or cancelled during the period | – | – | – | – |
| Outstanding at the end of the period | 1,684 | 3.40 | 6,883 | |
| Exercisable at the end of the period | 1,684 | 3.40 | 6,883 |
A total of 21 thousand options held by Fortum Assets Oy were annulled in December 2006.
| Expiry date | 2007 | 2006 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Exercise price in EUR per share |
Number of options (thousand) |
Exercise price in EUR per share |
Number of options (thousand) |
||
| Stock options scheme for key employees (2001A) | 1.5.2007 | – | – | 3.40 | 275 |
| Stock options scheme for key employees (2001B) | 1.5.2007 | – | – | 3.40 | 1,340 |
| Stock options scheme for key employees (2002A) | 1.5.2007 | – | – | 3.40 | 122 |
| Stock options scheme for key employees (2002B) | 1.5.2009 | 3.40 | 1,684 | 3.40 | 5,146 |
| 1,684 | 6,883 |
In compliance with IFRS, the fair value was defined for 2002B options that were granted 15 April 2003 and vested 2 October 2006. The fair value of transferable 2002B options was determined at the grant date by using the Binomial valuation model and has been expensed over the vesting period, which ended 2 October 2006. The fair values of other option schemes have not been determined and they were not included in expense recognition. Last year 2006 the fair valuation of 2002B had an impact of EUR – 4 million on the Group's profit. The parameters used in the fair valuation in 2006
On 31 December 2007, the members of the Supervisory Board of Fortum Corporation owned a total of 200 shares or 0.0% of the shares and voting rights. The members of the Board of Directors owned a total of 31,591 shares, which corresponds to 0.0% of the were as follows; the share price EUR 6.41, the subscription price EUR 5.88, expected average volatility 30%, the dividend yield zero, the option lifetime 4 years and risk free interest rate 4%.
The volatility measured at the standard deviation of expected share price returns was based on statistical analysis of historical share prices at the grant date over the prior three and a half years added with a 7% margin. The risk-free interest rate was based on the government zero coupon bond interest rate at the measurement date with a maturity equaling the option exercise period.
company's shares and voting rights. The President and CEO and other members of the Fortum Management Team owned a total of 317,030 shares which corresponds to less than 0.036% of the company's shares and voting rights.
| Shares held by member of the Board of Directors | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ------------------------------------------------- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| 2007 | 2006 | |
|---|---|---|
| Peter Fagernäs | 30,591 | 30,591 |
| Christian Ramm-Schmidt | 1,000 | 1,000 |
| Total | 31,591 | 31,591 |
| 2007 | 2006 | |
|---|---|---|
| Mikael Frisk | 14,900 | 14,900 |
| Timo Karttinen | 30,000 | 30,000 |
| Tapio Kuula | 50,050 | 50,050 |
| Juha Laaksonen | 20,000 | 20,000 |
| Mikael Lilius | 170,050 | 170,050 |
| Christian Lundberg | 30,000 | 30,000 |
| Maria Paatero-Kaarnakari (from 1 September 2007) | 2,030 | – |
| Maria Romantschuk (from 1 September 2007) | – | – |
| Carola Teir-Lehtinen (until 31 August 2007) | – | 23,000 |
| Total | 317,030 | 338,000 |
Fortum Management Team members did not have any remaining stock options on 31 December 2007.
On 31 December 2006 Carola Teir-Lehtinen from Fortum Management Team had 55,970 remaining 2002B stock options, other members did not have any remaining stock options.
| 2001A | 2001B | 2002A | 2002B | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mikael Frisk | 100,000 | 100,000 | 150,000 | 150,000 |
| Timo Karttinen | 50,000 | 75,000 | 90,000 | 120,000 |
| Tapio Kuula | 100,000 | 100,000 | 200,000 | 200,000 |
| Juha Laaksonen | 100,000 | 100,000 | 250,000 | 175,000 |
| Mikael Lilius | 200,000 | 200,000 | 340,000 | 340,000 |
| Christian Lundberg | – | – | 150,000 | 175,000 |
| Maria Paatero-Kaarnakari (from 1 September 2007) | 25,000 | 25,000 | 42,000 | 42,000 |
| Maria Romantschuk (from 1 September 2007) | – | – | – | – |
| Carola Teir-Lehtinen (until 31 August 2007) | 100,000 | 100,000 | 150,000 | 150,000 |
Stock options 2001A and 2001B were given to management and personnel during the year 2001.
Stock options 2002A and 2002B were given to management and personnel during the year 2002.
| EUR million | 2007 | 2006 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| AB Fortum Värme Holding samägt med Stockholms stad | Sweden | 270 | 228 |
| Fortum Wroclaw S.A. | Poland | 1 | 2 |
| Jyväskylän Energiatuotanto Oy | Finland | 4 | 4 |
| Tartu Energi Group | Estonia | 5 | 4 |
| Ekerö Energi Group | Sweden | 4 | 4 |
| Other | 8 | 11 | |
| Total minority interests | 292 | 253 |
Fortum owns, via Fortum Power and Heat AB, 90.1% of the shares which represents 50.1% of the votes in AB Fortum Värme Holding samägt med Stockholms stad. 9.9% of the shares are owned by the City of Stockholm. The City of Stockholm holds preference shares in AB Fortum Värme Holding samägt med Stockholms stad, which entitles them 50% of the economical output. The ownership and administration of AB Fortum Värme Holding samägt med Stockholms stad is settled by a consortium agreement.
| EUR million | 2007 | 2006 |
|---|---|---|
| Bonds | 2,820 | 2,775 |
| Loans from financial institutions | 467 | 306 |
| Finance lease liabilities | 30 | 32 |
| Other long-term interest-bearing debt | 971 | 947 |
| Total long-term interest-bearing debt | 4,288 | 4,060 |
| Current portion of long-term bonds | 541 | 10 |
| Current portion of loans from financial institutions | 36 | 40 |
| Current portion of other long-term interest-bearing debt | 1 | 321 |
| Current portion of financial lease liabilities | 1 | 14 |
| Commercial papers | – | 55 |
| Other short-term interest-bearing debt | 26 | 2 |
| Total short-term interest-bearing debt | 605 | 442 |
| Total interest-bearing debt | 4,893 | 4,502 |
| Effective interest |
amount | Carrying Repricing Repricing Repricing under |
1–5 | over | Fair value |
Carrying amount |
Fair value |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EUR million | rate | 2007 | 1 year | years | 5 years | 2007 | 2006 | 2006 |
| Bonds | 4.8 | 3,361 | 1,176 | 705 | 1,480 | 3,416 | 2,785 | 2,887 |
| Loans from financial institutions | 4.8 | 503 | 482 | 21 | 0 | 515 | 346 | 348 |
| Other long-term interest-bearing debt 1) | 4.5 | 1,003 | 978 | 16 | 9 | 1,007 | 1,314 | 1,309 |
| Total long-term interest-bearing debt 2) | 4.7 | 4,867 | 2,636 | 742 | 1,489 | 4,938 | 4,445 | 4,544 |
| Commercial paper | – | – | – | – | – | – | 55 | 55 |
| Other short-term interest-bearing debt | 4.9 | 26 | 26 | – | – | 26 | 2 | 2 |
| Total short-term interest-bearing debt | 4.9 | 26 | 26 | – | – | 26 | 57 | 57 |
| Total interest-bearing debt | 4.7 3) | 4,893 | 2,662 | 742 | 1,489 | 4,964 | 4,502 | 4,601 |
1) Includes loan from State Nuclear Waste Management Fund and Teollisuuden Voima Oy EUR 658 million (2006: 627 million), financial leases EUR 31 million (2006: 46 million), loans from from Fortum's Finnish pension fund EUR 33 million (2006: 33 million), other loans EUR 281 million (2006: 288 million) and in 2006 financing arrangement related to Nybroviken Kraft AB matured in 2007 (2006: EUR 320 million).
2) Including current portion of long-term debt.
3) The effective interest rate including interest-bearing debt and derivatives is 4.6% (2006: 4.1%).
| Interest basis |
Interest rate |
Effective interest |
Currency | Nominal million |
Carrying amount |
||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Issued /Maturity Loan description 1) | 31.12.07 | ||||||
| 2003 / 2010 | Fortum Oyj EUR 5,000 Million EMTN Programme | Fixed | 4.625 | 4.728 | EUR | 500 | 494 |
| 2003 / 2013 | Fortum Oyj EUR 5,000 Million EMTN Programme | Fixed | 5.000 | 5.164 | EUR | 500 | 493 |
| 2000 / 2008 | Fortum Oyj EUR 5,000 Million EMTN Programme | Floating | Euribor 3M+0.75 | EUR | 20 | 20 | |
| 2000 / 2008 | Fortum Oyj EUR 5,000 Million EMTN Programme | Floating | Stibor 3M+0.60 | SEK | 200 | 21 | |
| 2003 / 2008 | Fortum Oyj EUR 5,000 Million EMTN Programme | Fixed | 6.100 | 6.242 | EUR | 500 | 500 |
| 2006 / 2011 | Fortum Oyj EUR 5,000 Million EMTN Programme | Fixed | 3.750 | 3.793 | SEK | 2,000 | 211 |
| 2006 / 2009 | Fortum Oyj EUR 5,000 Million EMTN Programme | Floating | Stibor 3M+0.10 | SEK | 2,500 | 265 | |
| 2006 / 2016 | Fortum Oyj EUR 5,000 Million EMTN Programme | Fixed | 4.500 | 4.615 | EUR | 750 | 715 |
| 2007 / 2012 | Fortum Oyj EUR 5,000 Million EMTN Programme | Floating | Stibor 3M+0.15 | SEK | 3,500 | 370 | |
| 2007 / 2014 | Fortum Oyj EUR 5,000 Million EMTN Programme | Fixed | 4.700 | 4.764 | SEK | 2,600 | 272 |
| Total outstanding carrying amount 31 December 2007 | 3,361 |
1) EMTN = Euro Medium Term Note
During the year Fortum raised SEK 7,850 million (EUR 831 million) of new long-term financing was used partly to refinance maturing SEK and EUR denominated loans of EUR 441 million. The maturities of the new financing agreements varied between 5 and 10 years and consisted of two in total SEK 6,100 million (EUR 646 million) bonds issued under Fortum's Euro Medium Term Note programme, as well as two bilateral loan agreements of in total SEK 1,750 million (EUR 185 million). The reported interest-bearing debt increased by EUR
391 million to EUR 4,893 million (2006: 4,502 million) at year end.
The Nybroviken Kraft AB (Nykab) financing arrangement of Swedish hydropower assets originally established in 1990 consisting of loans (SEK 2,000 million) and preference shares (SEK 890 million classified as interest-bearing liability according to IAS 32 and IAS 39) was terminated on 31 October 2007 by Fortum Generation AB exercising it's call option to purchase all outstanding loans and preference shares under the agreement. The termination of the financing
arrangement had a negative cash-flow effect as accrued interest gradually accumulating since the start of the agreement amounting to EUR 58 (SEK 543) million was settled and paid. The assets that
were pledged as a security for the loans, have been released, see Note 40 Pledged assets.
On 31 December 2007 Fortum had a small number of finance leasing agreements for machinery and equipment. No new leasing commitments were entered into in 2007 or 2006.
| EUR million | 2007 | 2006 |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum lease payments | 42 | 57 |
| Less future finance charges | 11 | 11 |
| Present value of finance lease liabilities | 31 | 46 |
| EUR million | 2007 | 2006 |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum lease payments | ||
| Less than 1 year | 3 | 15 |
| 1–5 years | 16 | 15 |
| Over 5 years | 23 | 27 |
| Total | 42 | 57 |
| EUR million | 2007 | 2006 |
|---|---|---|
| Less than 1 year | 1 | 14 |
| 1–5 years | 9 | 8 |
| Over 5 years | 21 | 24 |
| Total | 31 | 46 |
| 1 Jan 2007 | Charged to income statement |
Charged in equity |
Exchange rate differences, reclassifications and other |
Acquisitions and disposals |
31 Dec 2007 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EUR million | changes | |||||
| Deferred tax assets | ||||||
| Property, plant and equipment | 17 | –7 | – | – | – | 10 |
| Provisions | 29 | –10 | – | – | – | 19 |
| Tax losses and tax credits carry-forward | 9 | 11 | – | – | – | 20 |
| Other | 15 | –5 | – | – | – | 10 |
| Total deferred tax assets | 70 | –11 | – | – | – | 59 |
| Offset against deferred tax liabilities | –65 | 9 | – | –56 | ||
| Deferred tax assets after offset | 5 | –2 | – | – | – | 3 |
| Deferred tax liabilities | ||||||
| Property, plant and equipment | 1,829 | –8 | – | –52 | – | 1,769 |
| Derivative financial instruments | 19 | –5 | –61 | – | – | –47 |
| Current assets | 7 | 0 | – | – | – | 7 |
| Other | 5 | 9 | – | – | – | 14 |
| Offset against deferred tax assets | –65 | 9 | – | – | – | –56 |
| Deferred tax liabilities after offset | 1,795 | 5 | –61 | –52 | – | 1,687 |
Deferred income tax assets and liabilities are offset when there is a legally enforceable right to offset current tax assets against current tax liabilities and when the deferred income taxes relate to the same fiscal authority.
Deferred income tax assets are recognised for tax loss carry-forward to the extent that the realisation of the related tax benefit through future profits is probable. The recognised tax assets relate to losses carry-forward with no expiration date and partly with expiry date as described below.
| 2007 | 2006 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EUR million | Loss carry forwards |
Deferred tax assets |
Loss carry forwards |
Deferred tax assets |
| Losses without expiration date (Norway and Sweden) | 73 | 19 | 23 | 6 |
| Losses with expiration date (Poland) | 14 | 1 | 15 | 2 |
Deferred tax assets of EUR 16 million (2006: 14 million) have not been recognised in the consolidated financial statements, because the realisation is not probable. The major part of the unrecognised tax asset (EUR 13 million) relates to capital loss in UK, which has no expiration date. Rest of the unrecognised tax losses (EUR 3 million) relates to loss carry-forwards that are unlikely to be used under the expiration date.
Deferred income tax liabilities of EUR 3 million (2006: 4 million) have not been recognised for the withholding tax and other taxes that would be payable on the unremitted earnings of 100% owned subsidiaries. Such amounts are permanently reinvested.
Deferred tax liability EUR 2.2 million (2006: none) has been booked on the retained earnings that are expected to be distributed from Estonian subsidiaries. Unremitted earnings totalled EUR 25 million on 31 December 2007 (2006: 25 million).
| EUR million | 1 Jan 2006 | Charged to income statement |
Charged in equity |
Exchange rate differences, reclassifications and other changes |
Acquisitions and disposals |
31 Dec 2006 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Deferred tax assets | ||||||
| Property, plant and equipment | 3 | 6 | – | – | 8 | 17 |
| Provisions | 16 | 4 | – | – | 9 | 29 |
| Tax losses and tax credits carry-forward | 8 | 1 | – | – | – | 9 |
| Other | 31 | –8 | – | –10 | 2 | 15 |
| Total deferred tax assets | 58 | 3 | – | –10 | 19 | 70 |
| Offset against deferred tax liabilities | –40 | – | – | – | – | –65 |
| Deferred tax assets after offset | 18 | 3 | – | –10 | 19 | 5 |
| Deferred tax liabilities | ||||||
| Property, plant and equipment | 1,582 | –38 | – | 70 | 215 | 1,829 |
| Derivative financial instruments | –68 | 8 | 68 | 9 | 2 | 19 |
| Current assets | 0 | – | – | – | 7 | 7 |
| Other | 38 | –7 | – | –26 | – | 5 |
| Offset against deferred tax assets | –40 | – | – | – | – | –65 |
| Deferred tax liabilities after offset | 1,512 | –37 | 68 | 53 | 224 | 1,795 |
Deferred tax assets and liabilities from acquisitions 2006 mainly refer to Fortum Espoo.
| EUR million | Pension | Environmental | Other | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 January 2007 | 126 | 13 | 47 | 186 |
| Provisions for the period | – | – | 2 | 2 |
| Provisions used | –7 | –4 | –22 | –33 |
| Provisions reversed | – | – | –11 | –11 |
| 31 December 2007 | 119 | 9 | 16 | 144 |
| Allocation between current and non-current provisions | ||||
| Current provisions | – | – | 2 | 2 |
| Non-current provisions | 119 | 9 | 14 | 142 |
| EUR million | Pension | Impregnated poles | Environmental | Other | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 January 2006 | 119 | 17 | 21 | 31 | 188 |
| Provisions for the period | 7 | – | 2 | 50 | 59 |
| Provisions used | – | – | –10 | –32 | –42 |
| Provisions reversed | – | –17 | – | –2 | –19 |
| 31 December 2006 | 126 | 0 | 13 | 47 | 186 |
| Allocation between current and non-current provisions | |||||
| Current provisions | – | – | – | 1 | 1 |
| Non-current provisions | 126 | – | 13 | 46 | 185 |
Environmental provision relates to dismantling of buildings and structures on contaminated land. The provision is estimated to be used within five years. Other provisions include provisions for insurance payments, tax claims and provisions for onerous contracts. The provision is estimated to be used within two to five years. Pension obligations include EUR 2 million (2006: 2 million) of unpaid liabilities related to defined contribution plans, see Note 36 Pension obligations.
The Group companies have various defined benefit and defined contribution pension plans in accordance with the local conditions and practices in the countries in which they operate. The concerned pensions are primarily retirement pensions, disability pensions and family pensions but contain also early retirement arrangements.
In Finland the most significant pension plan is the Finnish Statutory Employment Pension Scheme (TyEL) in which benefits are directly linked to employees' earnings. These pensions are funded in insurance company and treated as defined contribution plans. The benefits provided under TyEL are old age pensions, disability pensions, unemployment pensions and survivors' pensions. The disability component of TyEL has earlier been accounted for as a defined benefit plan. In December 2004, the Finnish Ministry of Social Affairs and Health approved certain changes to the principles for calculating disability component of pension liabilities under TyEL, effective from January 2006 onwards. According to the new practice, also the disability component of TyEL is accounted for as a defined contribution plan. In addition, certain employees in Finland have additional pension coverage through companies' own pension funds or through insurance companies.
In Sweden the Group operates several defined benefit and defined contribution plans like the general ITP-pension plan and the PA-KL and PA-KFS plans that are eligible for employees within companies formerly owned by municipalities. The pension arrangements comprise normally retirement pension, complementary retirement pensions, survivors' pension and disability pension. The most significant pension plan is the ITP-plan for white-collar employees in permanent employment (or temporary employees after a certain waiting period), who fulfill the age conditions. To qualify for a full pension the employee must have a projected period The provision for impregnated poles was reversed in 2006, since EU legislation allows to re-use the poles. Previous legislation forbade the re-use and demanded dismantling of the poles. The related investment cost in property, plant and equipment was also reversed. The net effect to the income statement was less than EUR 1 million.
of pensionable service, from the date of entry until retirement age, of at least 30 years. The ITP-plan is partly financed through insurance premiums or and partly through provisions in the balance sheet (book-reserves). The part of the ITP multiemployer pension plan that is secured by paying pension premiums to Alecta, in Fortum's case the collective family pension, is accounted for as a defined contribution plan due to lack of information necessary to account for the plan as a defined benefit plan.
The Norwegian companies are part of schemes that are common for municipalities in Norway. These are defined benefit pension plans and provide old age pensions and disability pension, including pension benefits from the National Insurance Scheme (Folketrygden). The schemes also provide survivor's pensions. The schemes are fully funded within the rules set out in the Norwegian insurance legislation.
In other countries the pension arrangements are done in accordance with the local legislation and practice, mostly being defined contribution plans.
The pension obligations are calculated annually, on the balance sheet date, based on actuarial principles. When accounting for defined contribution plans the obligation for each period is determined by the amounts to be contributed for that period. When accounting for defined benefit plans, actuarial calculations are required to measure the obligation on discounted basis and the expense. The plan assets for pensions are valued at market value. When the net cumulative unrecognised actuarial gain or loss on pension obligations and plan assets goes outside the corridor with 10% of the greater of either pension obligations or the market value of the plan assets, the surplus amount is amortised over the average remaining employment period.
| EUR million | 2007 | 2006 |
|---|---|---|
| Current service cost | –11 | –13 |
| Interest cost | –16 | –15 |
| Expected return on plan assets | 15 | 13 |
| Settlements | 1 | 0 |
| Total included in employee costs (Note 14) | –11 | –15 |
The actual return on plan assets in Finland and Sweden totalled EUR 17 million (EUR 33 million in 2006).
| EUR million | 2007 | 2006 |
|---|---|---|
| Present value of funded obligations | 390 | 361 |
| Fair value of plan assets | –276 | –250 |
| Deficit (+) / Surplus (–) |
114 | 111 |
| Present value of unfunded obligations | 0 | 1 |
| Unrecognised actuarial gains and losses | –11 | 12 |
| Net asset (–) / liability (+) in the balance sheet |
103 | 124 |
| Defined benefit asset included in the assets (Note 24) | 14 | 0 |
| Pension obligations in the balance sheet | 117 | 124 |
| Experience adjustments arising on funded obligations; gain (–) / loss (+) |
11 | 21 |
| Experience adjustments arising on plan assets; gain (+) / loss (–) |
21 | –10 |
| EUR million | 2007 | 2006 |
|---|---|---|
| 1 January | 124 | 117 |
| Exchange rate differencies | –4 | 0 |
| Impact of acquired/sold companies | 0 | 4 |
| Structural changes in pension fund arrangements | 0 | 3 |
| Total expense charged in the income statement | 12 | 15 |
| Contributions paid | –29 | –15 |
| 31 December Net asset (–) / liability (+) |
103 | 124 |
| Defined benefit obligations | 117 | 124 |
| Defined benefit assets included in assets | –14 | 0 |
| Net asset (–) / liability (+) |
103 | 124 |
Contributions expected to be paid during the year 2008 are EUR 21 million.
| EUR million | 2007 | 2006 |
|---|---|---|
| 1 January | 367 | 377 |
| Exchange rate differencies | –7 | 0 |
| Service cost | 11 | 12 |
| Interest cost | 15 | 16 |
| Increase in obligation | 0 | 0 |
| Effect of settlement | –5 | –4 |
| Actuarial gains (–) / losses (+) on obligations |
25 | –16 |
| Benefits paid | –16 | –18 |
| 31 December | 390 | 367 |
| EUR million | 2007 | 2006 |
|---|---|---|
| 1 January | 250 | 224 |
| Exchange rate differencies | 0 | –2 |
| Expected return of plan assets | 15 | 14 |
| Actuarial gains and losses | 1 | 17 |
| Contributions by employer | 24 | 7 |
| Effect of settlement | –5 | –2 |
| Benefits paid | –9 | –8 |
| 31 December | 276 | 250 |
| EUR million | 2007 | 2006 |
|---|---|---|
| Equity instruments | 73 | 74 |
| Debt instruments | 53 | 53 |
| Property occupied by the Group | 65 | 59 |
| Company's own ordinary shares | 9 | 6 |
| Other assets | 76 | 58 |
| Total | 276 | 250 |
When the pension plan has been financed through incurance company, the specification of plan assets has not been available. In these cases the fair value of plan assets has been included in the Other assets.
| 2007 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EUR million | Finland | Sweden | Other countries |
Total |
| Present value of funded obligations | 202 | 153 | 35 | 390 |
| Fair value of plan assets | –230 | –25 | –21 | –276 |
| Deficit (+) / Surplus (–) | –28 | 128 | 14 | 114 |
| Present value of unfunded obligations | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Unrecognised actuarial gains and losses | 28 | –32 | –7 | –11 |
| Net asset (–) / liability (+) in the balance sheet | 0 | 96 | 7 | 103 |
| Defined benefit asset included in the assets (Note 24) | 14 | 0 | 0 | 14 |
| Pension obligations in the balance sheet | 14 | 96 | 7 | 117 |
| 2006 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EUR million | Finland | Sweden | Other countries |
Total |
| Present value of funded obligations | 190 | 149 | 22 | 361 |
| Fair value of plan assets | –210 | –24 | –16 | –250 |
| Deficit (+) / Surplus (–) | –20 | 125 | 6 | 111 |
| Present value of unfunded obligations | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Unrecognised actuarial gains and losses | 38 | –26 | 0 | 12 |
| Net asset (–) / liability (+) in the balance sheet | 18 | 99 | 7 | 124 |
| 2007 | 2006 | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EUR million | Finland | Sweden | Other countries |
Finland | Sweden | Other countries |
| Discount rate, % | 5.00 | 4.50 | 4.70 | 4.50 | 4.00 | 4.75 |
| Expected return on plan assets, % | 6.50 | 4.50 | 5.75 | 6.50 | 4.00 | 5.80 |
| Future salary increases, % | 4.00 | 3.50 | 3.20 | 3.50 | 3.50 | 3.20 |
| Future pension increases, % | 2.10 | 2.00 | 2.70 | 2.00 | 2.00 | 2.70 |
The discount rate in Finland is based on the quoted European government bonds with maturity that best reflects the estimated term of the defined benefit pension plans. The discount rate in Sweden and Norway is based on the yield of long-term government bonds which are consistent with the currency and the estimated term of the post-employment benefit obligations.
During 2007, new mortality tables were published by the Swedish Insurance Supervisory Board (Finansinspektionen). The new tables are based on updated data and present mortality rates for different age cohorts. The Group has adopted the new mortality tables as at December 31, 2007. The change of mortality table results in an actuarial loss in aggregate of 7% due to the increase in average life expectancy.
Fortum owns the Loviisa nuclear power plant in Finland. Based on the Nuclear Energy Act in Finland, Fortum has a legal obligation to fully fund the legal liability decided by the governmental authorities, for decommissioning of the power plant and disposal of spent fuel
through the State Nuclear Waste Management Fund. The text below should be read in conjunction with information in Note 1 Accounting principles.
| EUR million | 2007 | 2006 |
|---|---|---|
| Carrying values in the balance sheet | ||
| Nuclear provisions | 516 | 450 |
| Share in the State Nuclear Waste Management Fund | 516 | 450 |
| Legal liability and actual share of the State Nuclear Waste Management Fund | ||
| Liability for nuclear waste management according to the Nuclear Energy Act | 816 | 685 |
| Funding obligation target | 698 | 649 |
| Fortum's share of the State Nuclear Waste Management Fund | 673 | 636 |
The nuclear provisions are related to future obligations for nuclear waste management including decommissioning of the power plant and disposal of spent fuel. The fair values of the provisions are calculated according to IAS 37 based on future cash-flows regarding estimated future costs for each of the provisions separately. The cash-flows used are based on the cash-flows which are also the basis for the legal liability. Both provisions are included in Nuclear provisions in the balance sheet.
In September 2007 Fortum submitted the yearly proposal for the nuclear waste management legal liability regarding the Loviisa nuclear power plant to the Ministry of Employment and the Economy (previously Ministry of Trade and Industry). The legal liability is calculated according to the Nuclear Energy Act in Finland and is decided by the Ministry of Employment and the Economy in January every year. The proposal was based on an updated cost estimate, which is done every year, and on a new technical plan, which is made every third year. Based on the new plan, the future costs are estimated to increase mainly due to the new technical solution related to filling material for the tunnels in the final repository.
The updated legal liability at the end of 2007 amounted to EUR 816 million (2006: 685 million). The carrying value of the nuclear provisions in the balance sheet increased with EUR 66 million compared to 31 December 2006, totalling EUR 516 million as of 31 December 2007. The main reason for the difference between the carrying value of the provision and the legal liability is the fact that the legal liability is not discounted to net present value.
The increase of the provision for spent fuel caused a negative one-time effect of EUR 13 million in comparable operating profit in Q3 2007 due to higher nuclear waste management costs related to already spent fuel. The increase of the provision for spent fuel also caused negative one-time interest costs, due to unwinding of the provision for the period during which the spent fuel provision has been accumulated and present point in time, which are recognised immediately in the income statement.
The increase of the provision for decommissioning is added to the nuclear decommissioning cost and depreciated over the remaining estimated operating time of the nuclear power plant. See Note 22 Property, plant and equipment.
| EUR million | 2007 | 2006 |
|---|---|---|
| Nuclear provisions | ||
| At 1 January | 450 | 418 |
| Additional provisions | 46 | 24 |
| Used during the year | –15 | –17 |
| Unwinding of discount | 35 | 25 |
| At 31 December | 516 | 450 |
| Carrying value of Fortum's share in the State Nuclear Waste Management Fund | 516 | 450 |
Fortum contributes funds to the State Nuclear Waste Management Fund in Finland to cover future obligations based on the legal liability calculated according to the Finnish Nuclear Energy Act. The fund is managed by governmental authorities. The carrying value of the Fund in Fortum's balance sheet is calculated according to IFRIC 5 Rights to interests arising from Decommissioning, Restoration and Environmental Rehabilitation Funds.
According to the Nuclear Energy Act, Fortum is obligated to contribute the funds in full to the State Nuclear Waste Management Fund to cover the legal liability. Based on the law, Fortum applied for periodising of the payments to the Fund over six years, due to the proposed increase in the legal liability. The application was approved by Council of State in December 2007.
Fortum Corporation Annual Report 2007 – Financials
The periodisation of the payments to the State Nuclear Waste Management Fund has an impact on cash-flow, but also on operating profit since the carrying value of the Fund in the balance sheet cannot exceed the carrying value of the nuclear provisions according to IFRIC Interpretation 5. The Fund is from an IFRS perspective overfunded with EUR 157 million, since Fortum's share of the Fund as of 31 December 2007 is EUR 673 million and the carrying value in the balance sheet is EUR 516 million.
Operating profit for 2007 includes a positive cumulative adjustment of EUR 17 (0) million, due to the increase of the carrying value of the Fund in the balance sheet as a result of the increased provision. The positive effect on Q3 2007 was EUR 33 (–2) million. In Q4 the adjustment is negative, EUR –7 (–4) million, since the value of the Fund has increased more than the carrying value of the provision. These adjustments are included in "Other items effecting comparability" in the Power Generation segment, see Note 4 Primary segment information, and are not included in comparable operating profit. As long as the Fund stays overfunded from an IFRS perspective, positive accounting effects to Operating profit will always occur when the nuclear provision is increasing more than the net payments to the Fund. Negative accounting effects will occur when the net payments to the Fund are higher than the increase of the provision.
The funding obligation target for the each year is decided by the Ministry of Employment and the Economy retrospectively in January each year after the legal liability has been decided. The difference between the funding obligation target for Fortum and Fortum's actual share of the State Nuclear Waste Fund is paid in Q1 each year.
The funding obligation target corresponding to both the new legal liability and the new decision for periodisation to the Fund amounts EUR 698 (649) million. The difference between the legal
liability at year end 2007 and the corresponding funding obligation target, EUR 25 million (2006: 13 million) is covered by a security which has been given in the end of June 2007. The real estate mortgages given also covers unexpected events according to the Nuclear Energy Act, see also Note 40 Pledged assets.
Finnish participants in the State Nuclear Waste Management Fund are allowed to borrow from the Fund according to certain rules. Fortum uses the right to borrow back and has pledged Kemijoki shares as security for the loan. See also Note 25 Long-term and short-term interest-bearing receivables and Note 40 Pledged assets.
Fortum has minority shareholdings in associated Finnish and Swedish nuclear production companies. The shareholdings entitle Fortum to electricity produced according to consortium agreements.
Regarding the Finnish company Teollisuuden Voima Oy (TVO), similar IFRS nuclear accounting adjustments are made when accounting for the share of profit from the associate company. Regarding the two Swedish shareholdings, OKG AB and Forsmarks Kraftgrupp AB, Fortum has not been able to account for the nuclear assets and provisions according to Fortum accounting principles since the separate cash-flow information for the two provisions is not available.
Fortum has according to law given guarantees to the Finnish and Swedish nuclear Funds on behalf of the associated companies, to guarantee that sufficient funds exist to cover future expenses of decommissioning of the power plants and disposal of spent fuel, see Note 42 Contingent liabilities.
Through the shareholding in TVO, Fortum uses the right to borrow from the Fund.
| EUR million | 2007 | 2006 |
|---|---|---|
| Connection fees | 405 | 400 |
| Other liabilities | 81 | 85 |
| Total | 486 | 485 |
Connection fees to the electricity network in Finland that are paid before 2003 are refundable, if the customer would ever disconnect the initial connection. The connections fees to the electricity network amounted to EUR 307 million (2006: 307 million).
Connection fees to the district heating network in Finland amounted to EUR 98 million (2006: 93 million).
| EUR million | 2007 | 2006 |
|---|---|---|
| Trade payables | 272 | 242 |
| Accrued expenses and deferred income | ||
| Personnel expenses | 89 | 93 |
| Interest expenses | 107 | 154 |
| Other accrued expenses and deferred income | 201 | 127 |
| Other liabilities | ||
| VAT-liability | 34 | 61 |
| Energy taxes | 36 | 31 |
| Advances received | 62 | 78 |
| Other liabilities | 68 | 58 |
| Total | 869 | 844 |
The management consider that the amount of trade and other payables approximates fair value.
| EUR million | 2007 | 2006 |
|---|---|---|
| On own behalf | ||
| For debt | ||
| Pledges | 170 | 176 |
| Real estate mortgages | 138 | 49 |
| For other commitments | ||
| Real estate mortgages | 103 | 56 |
| On behalf of associated companies and joint ventures | ||
| Pledges and real estate mortgages | 3 | 3 |
Finnish participants in the State Nuclear Waste Management Fund are allowed to borrow from the Fund. Fortum has during 2007 increased the loan from the fund and has pledged additional shares in Kemijoki as security. The carrying value of the pledged shares is EUR 145 million as of 31 December 2007 (2006: 102 million).
In October 2007, Fortum terminated the financing agreement with AP-fonden relating to Fortum's Swedish subsidiary, Nybroviken Kraft AB. Shares in subsidiaries and associated companies to Nybroviken Kraft AB amounting to EUR 51 million as of 31 December 2006, that had been pledged as security for the loan, were hereby released. Pledges also include bank deposits as trading collateral of EUR 5 million (2006: 2 million) for trading of electricity and CO2 allowances in Nord Pool and trading of CO2 with Intercontinental Exchange (ICE) and European Energy Exchange (EEX).
During 2007 Fortum Tartu in Estonia (60% owned by Fortum) has given real estate mortgages for a value of EUR 95 million as a security for an external loan. Real estate mortgages are also given for loans from Fortum's pension fund for EUR 41 million (2006: 41 million). Regarding the relevant interest-bearing liabilities, see Note 33 Interest-bearing Liabilities.
Fortum has given real estate mortgages in Naantali and Inkoo power plants in Finland for a value of EUR 102 million (2006: 56 million) as a security to the State Nuclear Waste Management Fund for the uncovered part of the legal liability and unexpected events relating to costs for future decommissioning and disposal of spent fuel in the wholly owned Loviisa nuclear power plant. The legal liability, based on the situation as of 31 December, is decided by the the Ministry of Employment and the Economy in January the following year and the amount of the security is adjusted by the end of June. See also Note 37 Nuclear related assets and liabilities.
Capital expenditure contracted for at the balance sheet date but not recognised in the financial statements is as follows
| EUR million | 2007 | 2006 |
|---|---|---|
| Property, plant and equipment | 425 | 266 |
| Intangible assets | 11 | 0 |
| Total | 436 | 266 |
Fortum leases office equipment and cars under various non-cancellable operating leases, some of which contain renewal options.
The future costs for non-cancellable operating leasing contracts are stated below.
Lease rental expenses amounting to EUR 12 million (2006: 19 million) are included in the income statement in other expenses. Future minimum lease payments include land leases with long lease periods.
| EUR million | 2007 | 2006 |
|---|---|---|
| Not later than 1 year | 21 | 20 |
| Later than 1 year and not later than 5 years | 31 | 38 |
| Later than 5 years | 69 | 78 |
| Total | 121 | 136 |
| EUR million | 2007 | 2006 |
|---|---|---|
| On own behalf | ||
| Other contingent liabilities | 224 | 144 |
| On behalf of associated companies and joint ventures | ||
| Guarantees | 235 | 213 |
| Other contingent liabilities | 125 | 125 |
| On behalf of others | ||
| Guarantees | 10 | 12 |
| Other contingent liabilities | 1 | 1 |
Other contingent liabilities on own behalf include guarantees issued for the fulfillment of various contractual obligations relating to Fortum's Service business in the UK, amounting to a maximum of EUR 85 million (2006: 99 million). The increase by EUR 80 million since 31 December 2006 is mainly due to guarantees given to suppliers for the new CHP plant being built by business unit Heat in Częstochowa, Poland.
Guarantees and other contingent liabilities on behalf of associated companies and joint ventures mainly consist of guarantees relating to Fortum's associated nuclear companies Teollisuuden Voima Oy (TVO), Forsmarks Kraftgrupp AB (FKA) and OKG AB (OKG). The guarantees are given in proportion to Fortum's respective ownership in each of these companies.
According to law, nuclear companies operating in Finland and Sweden shall give securities to the Finnish State Nuclear Waste Management Fund and the Swedish Nuclear Waste Fund respectively, to guarantee that sufficient funds exist to cover future expenses of decommissioning of the power plant and disposal of spent fuel. In Finland, Fortum has given a guarantee on behalf of TVO to
the Finnish State Nuclear Waste Management Fund amounting to EUR 32 million (2006: 20 million) to cover Fortum's part of TVO's uncovered part of the legal liability and for unexpected events. In Sweden, Fortum has given guarantees on behalf of FKA and OKG to the Swedish Nuclear Waste Fund to cover Fortum's part of FKA's and OKG's liability relating to unexpected events for EUR 195 million (2006: 185 million). The guarantees are changed the year after new decisions have been made regarding the level of the legal liabilities and the payment schedules to fund the Nuclear Waste Funds.
Meri-Pori power plant in Finland is owned by Fortum 54.55% and Teollisuuden Voima Oy (TVO) 45.45%. Based on the participation agreement Fortum has to give a guarantee to TVO against possible loss of asset or breach in contract of TVO's share of the asset, EUR 125 million (2006: 125 million).
Fortum's 100% owned subsidiary Fortum Heat and Gas Oy has a collective contingent liability with Neste Oil Oyj of the demerged Fortum Oil and Gas Oy's liabilities based on the Finnish Companies Act's (734/1978 ) Chapter 14a Paragraph 6.
The Swedish Energy Authority (EMI), which regulates and supervises the distribution network tariffs in Sweden, has performed supervision of distribution prices concerning year 2003. EMI utilizes a model called Nätnyttomodellen (NNM) for the supervision. The NNM estimates a reasonable cost for a fictive grid, which equals the maximum income that a distribution company may receive from its customers and any over debited amount, must be repaid.
EMI has given a decision on over debiting during 2003 for an aggregate amount of EUR 25 million to two subsidiaries of Fortum (Ekerö Energi AB and Fortum Distribution AB concerning the concession areas Stockholm and Västkusten). Both companies have filed a complaint to the County Administrative Court. Court decisions regarding these complaints are expected during the second or third quarter of 2008, at the earliest. All companies in the industry which have received decisions on over debiting have filed similar complaints.
Supervision processes regarding 2004, 2005 and 2006 tariffs have been started by EMI but no decisions have been made yet. Decisions regarding the 2004, 2005 and 2006 tariffs are expected only after court decisions for the pricing in 2003 are published.
At the beginning of 2007 the Finnish State owned 50.82% of the company and at the end of 2007 50.86%. See The Fortum share and shareholders section of the Operating and Financial Review for further information on Fortum shareholders. All transactions between Fortum and other companies owned by the Finnish State are on arms length basis. In the ordinary course of business Fortum engages in transactions on commercial terms with associated companies and other related parties, which are on same terms as they would be for third parties, except for some associates as discussed later in this note.
Fortum has not been involved in any material transactions with members of the Board of Directors or Fortum Management Team. No loans exist to any member of the Board of Directors or Fortum Management Team at 31 December 2007. Members of the Board of Directors and Fortum Management Team holdings of options and shares are disclosed in Note 31 Employee bonus and Incentive Schemes. Compensation to members of the Supervisory Board, the Board of Directors and Fortum Management Team are disclosed in Note 14 Management remuneration and employee costs.
Subsidiaries of Fortum, Grangemouth CHP Limited and Fortum O&M (UK) Limited, are defendants in a court case regarding greenhouse gas emissions allowances in the High Court of Justice in London. Grangemouth CHP Limited is a party to an Electricity Supply Agreement with Ineos Manufacturing Scotland Limited, pursuant to which Grangemouth CHP Limited provides electricity from its CHP plant to the Grangemouth site in Scotland until April 2016. Ineos Manufacturing Scotland Limited claims that it is entitled to all of the emissions allowances allocated under the EU ETS scheme for greenhouse gas emission allowance trading with respect to the CHP plant. Grangemouth CHP Limited denies this claim. The court decision is expected during 2008.
The Finnish Competition Authority gave on 2 June 2006 its conditional approval to the transaction by which Fortum acquired control in E.ON Finland Oyj. On 3 July 2006 Fortum appealed against the decision to the Market Court.
In addition to the litigations described above, some Group companies are involved in disputes incidental to their business. In management's opinion the outcome of such disputes will not have material effect on the Group's financial position.
All transactions between Fortum and other companies owned by the Finnish State are on arms length basis.
The service agreement with Neste Oil concerning services from Fortum's Shared Financial Service Center was terminated in August 2007. The service agreement was on arms length.
Fortum owns shareholdings in associated companies and joint ventures which in turn own hydro- and nuclear power plants. Under the consortium agreements, each owner is entitled to electricity in proportion to its share of ownership or other agreements. Each owner is liable for an equivalent portion of costs regardless of output. The associated companies are not profit making, since the owners purchase electricity at production cost including interest costs and income taxes, which generally is lower than market price. For further information of transactions and balances with associated companies and joint ventures, see Note 23 Investments in associated companies and joint ventures.
Norwegian Renewable Energy Corporation (REC) is partly owned by Fortum's associated company Hafslund ASA. Fortum shows the fair value changes of REC in equity. At year end, the cumulative fair value change booked in Fortum's equity was approximately EUR
790 million. REC's share price has decreased since the year end. Based on REC's closing price on 29 January 2008, the cumulative fair value change in Fortum's equity would have been approximately EUR 400 million.
86Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements, IFRS
| Group | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| holding | |||
| Company Name | Country | Segment | % |
| Asunto Oy Imatran | |||
| Voimakaari | Finland | t | 100.0 |
| Fortum | |||
| Asiakaspalvelu Oy 3) |
Finland | n s l | 100.0 |
| Fortum Assets Oy | Finland | t | 100.0 |
| Fortum Espoo | |||
| Distribution Oy 3) |
Finland | s | 100.0 |
| Fortum Heat and Gas Oy 3) | Finland | n t | 100.0 |
| Fortum Lämpö Oy | Finland | n | 100.0 |
| Fortum Markets Oy | Finland | l | 100.0 |
| Fortum Nuclear | |||
| Services Oy | Finland | l | 100.0 |
| Fortum Portfolio | |||
| Services Oy | Finland | l | 100.0 |
| Fortum Power | l n s | ||
| and Heat Oy 3) |
Finland | l t | 100.0 |
| Fortum Sähkönsiirto Oy 3) |
Finland | s | 100.0 |
| Hexivo Oy | Finland | l | 52.0 |
| Imatran Voima Oy | Finland | s | 100.0 |
| Imatrankosken Voima Oy | Finland | s | 100.0 |
| Jyväskylän | |||
| Energiantuotanto Oy | Finland | n | 60.0 |
| Kiinteistö Oy Espoon | |||
| Energiatalo | Finland | t | 100.0 |
| Killin Voima Oy | Finland | l | 60.0 |
| Koillis-Pohjan | |||
| Energiantuotanto Oy | Finland | l | 100.0 |
| Koskivo Oy | Finland | s | 100.0 |
| KPPV-Sijoitus Oy | Finland | s | 100.0 |
| Linnankosken Voima Oy | Finland | s | 100.0 |
| Lounais-Suomen | |||
| Lämpö Oy | Finland | s | 100.0 |
| Mansikkalan Voima Oy | Finland | s | 100.0 |
| Oy Pauken Ab | Finland | t | 100.0 |
| Oy Tersil Ab | Finland | s | 100.0 |
| Oy Tertrade Ab | Finland | s | 100.0 |
| Rajapatsaan Voima Oy | Finland | s | 100.0 |
| Saimaanrannan | |||
| Voima Oy | Finland | s | 100.0 |
| Tunturituuli Oy | Finland | l | 55.4 |
| Varsinais-Suomen | |||
| Sähkö Oy | Finland | s | 100.0 |
| Viikinki Energia Oy | Finland | l | 100.0 |
| Fortum Liegenschafts | |||
| verwaltungs Gmbh | Austria | t | 100.0 |
| Fortum Project | |||
| Finance N.V. 3) |
Belgium | l t | 100.0 |
| Group | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| holding | ||||
| Company Name | Country | Segment | % | |
| Fortum Energi A/S | 4) | Denmark | l | 100.0 |
| AS Anne Soojus | Estonia | n | 60.0 | |
| AS Fortum Tartu | Estonia | n | 60.0 | |
| AS Tartu Joujaam | Estonia | n | 60.0 | |
| AS Tartu Keskkatlamaja | Estonia | n | 60.0 | |
| Fortum CFS Eesti | ||||
| osauhing | Estonia | t | 100.0 | |
| Fortum Elekter AS | Estonia | s | 99.3 | |
| Fortum Termest AS | Estonia | n | 99.7 | |
| Lauka Turvas OU | Estonia | n | 60.0 | |
| Fortum Service | ||||
| Deutschland GmbH | Germany | l | 100.0 | |
| Fortum Direct Ltd | Great Britain | l | 100.0 | |
| Fortum Energy Ltd | Great Britain | l | 100.0 | |
| Fortum Gas Ltd | Great Britain | l | 100.0 | |
| Fortum Insurance Ltd | Great Britain | t | 100.0 | |
| Fortum O&M(UK) Limited | Great Britain | l | 100.0 | |
| Grangemouth | ||||
| CHP Limited | Great Britain | l | 100.0 | |
| IVO Energy Limited | Great Britain | l | 100.0 | |
| Kildare Energy Ltd | Ireland | l | 55.0 | |
| Fortum Latvija SIA | 1) | Latvia | n | 100.0 |
| UAB Fortum Ekosiluma | Lithuania | n | 100.0 | |
| UAB Fortum Heat Lietuva | Lithuania | n | 100.0 | |
| UAB Fortum Klaipeda | 2) | Lithuania | n | 51.0 |
| UAB Joniskio energija | Lithuania | n | 66.0 | |
| UAB Svencioniu energija | Lithuania | n | 50.0 | |
| Fortum Sendi | ||||
| Prima Sdn Bhd | Malaysia | l | 100.0 | |
| Baerum Fjernvarme AS | Norway | n | 100.0 | |
| Fortum Distribution AS | Norway | s l | 100.0 | |
| Fortum Förvaltning AS | Norway | l | 100.0 | |
| Fortum Holding | ||||
| Norway AS | Norway | l n s l | 100.0 | |
| Fortum Leasing AS | 2) | Norway | n | 100.0 |
| Fortum Markets AS | Norway | l | 100.0 | |
| Fortum Service AS | Norway | l | 100.0 | |
| Mosjøen Fjernvarme AS | Norway | n | 100.0 | |
| Fortum Częstochowa S.A. |
Poland | n | 98.7 | |
| Fortum DZT S.A. | Poland | n | 99.9 | |
| Fortum DZT | ||||
| Service Sp.z.o.o | Poland | n | 99.9 | |
| Fortum Heat | ||||
| Polska Sp z.o.o. | Poland | n t | 100.0 | |
| Fortum Plock Sp z o.o. | Poland | n | 98.7 | |
| Fortum Wroclaw SA | Poland | n | 99.2 |
n = Heat
s = Distribution l = Markets t = Other Operations
| Company Name | Country | Segment | % |
|---|---|---|---|
| LLC Fortum Energy | |||
| OOO Fortum Energija | Russia | l n t | 100.0 |
| AB Fortum Värme | |||
| Holding samägt med | |||
| Stockholms stad | Sweden | n | 50.1 |
| AB Fortum Värme | |||
| samägt med | |||
| Stockholms stad | Sweden | n | 50.1 |
| AB Ljusnans Samkörning | Sweden | s | 80.0 |
| Akallaverket AB | Sweden | n | 37.6 |
| Arvika Fjärrvärme AB | Sweden | n | 30.1 |
| Blybergs Kraft AB | Sweden | l | 66.7 |
| Brännälven Kraft AB | Sweden | l | 67.0 |
| Bullerforsens Kraft AB | Sweden | l | 88.0 |
| Ekerö Energi AB | Sweden | s | 81.7 |
| Ekerö Energi | |||
| Försäljning AB | Sweden | l | 81.7 |
| Fortum 1 AB 1) |
Sweden | t | 100.0 |
| Fortum Alfa AB | Sweden | l | 100.0 |
| Fortum Beta AB | Sweden | t | 100.0 |
| Fortum Dalälvens | |||
| Kraft AB | Sweden | l | 100.0 |
| Fortum Delta AB 1) |
Sweden | t | 100.0 |
| Fortum Distribution AB | Sweden | s | 100.0 |
| Fortum Distribution | |||
| Ryssa AB | Sweden | s | 100.0 |
| Fortum Fastigheter AB | Sweden | t | 100.0 |
| Fortum Generation AB | Sweden | l | 100.0 |
| Fortum Indalskraft AB | Sweden | l | 100.0 |
| Fortum Jota AB 1) |
Sweden | t | 100.0 |
| Fortum Ljunga Kraft AB | Sweden | l | 100.0 |
| Fortum Ljusnans | |||
| Kraft AB | Sweden | l | 100.0 |
| Fortum Markets AB | Sweden | l | 100.0 |
| Fortum Nordic AB 3) |
Sweden | t | 100.0 |
| Fortum Portfolio | |||
| Services AB | Sweden | l l | 100.0 |
| Fortum Power | |||
| and Heat AB | Sweden | l n l t | 100.0 |
| Fortum | |||
| Produktionsnät AB 1) |
Sweden | l | 100.0 |
| Fortum Service AB | Sweden | l | 100.0 |
| Fortum Service Öst AB | Sweden | l | 100.0 |
| Fortum Sweden AB 3) |
Sweden | t | 100.0 |
| Fortum Värme Alpha AB 2) |
Sweden | n | 50.1 |
| Fortum Värme | |||
| Fastigheter AB | Sweden | n | 50.1 |
| Group | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| holding | ||||
| Company Name | Country | Segment | % | |
| Fortum Värme | ||||
| Nynäshamn AB | Sweden | n | 100.0 | |
| Fortum Zeta AB | 2) | Sweden | t | 100.0 |
| Fortum Älvkraft i | ||||
| Värmland AB | Sweden | l | 100.0 | |
| Hällefors Värme AB | Sweden | n | 47.6 | |
| Mellansvensk | ||||
| Kraftgrupp AB | Sweden | l | 86.9 | |
| NGI Naturgasinvest AB | Sweden | n | 52.1 | |
| Nybroviken Kraft AB | Sweden | l | 100.0 | |
| Oreälvens Kraft AB | Sweden | l | 65.0 | |
| Parteboda Kraft AB | Sweden | l | 100.0 | |
| Recotech AB | Sweden | l | 100.0 | |
| Ryssa Energi AB | Sweden | l | 100.0 | |
| Sigtuna-Väsby | ||||
| Fastighets AB | Sweden | n | 50.1 | |
| Stockholm Gas AB | 2) | Sweden | n | 50.1 |
| Säffle 5:35 Fastighets AB | Sweden | n | 50.1 | |
| Säffle Fjärrvärme AB | Sweden | n | 25.6 | |
| Uddeholm Kraft AB | Sweden | t | 100.0 | |
| Voxnan Kraft AB | Sweden | l | 100.0 | |
| Värmlandsenergi AB | Sweden | t | 100.0 | |
| Värmlandskraft OKG | ||||
| delägarna AB | Sweden | l | 73.3 | |
| FB Generation | The | |||
| Services B.V. | Netherlands | l | 75.0 | |
| The | ||||
| Fortum Alpha B.V | 2) | Netherlands | t | 100.0 |
| Fortum East China | The | |||
| Energy Investments B.V. | Netherlands | l | 100.0 | |
| The | ||||
| Fortum Finance 2 BV | Netherlands | s t | 100.0 | |
| The | ||||
| Fortum Holding B.V. | 3) | Netherlands | l n t | 100.0 |
| Fortum Power | The | |||
| Holding B.V. | Netherlands | l | 100.0 | |
| The | ||||
| Fortum Russia BV | 2) | Netherlands | t | 100.0 |
| Fortum Russia | The | |||
| Holding B.V | Netherlands | t | 100.0 |
Fortum Corporation and its subsidiaries (together the Fortum Group) is a leading energy company in the Nordic countries and other parts of the Baltic Rim. Fortum's activities cover the generation, distribution and the sale of electricity and heat, the operation and maintenance of power plants as well as energy-related services. Neste Oil was included in Fortum Group up until 31 March 2005, when the Annual General Meeting took the final decision to separate the oil operations by distributing approximately 85% of Neste Oil Corporation shares as dividend. The remaining approximately 15% of shares were sold to investors in April 2005.
Oil operations have been presented as discontinued operations in years 2004 and 2005.
As from 2005, Fortum applies International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) for the annual and interim reports. The 2005 annual report included one comparison year 2004, which was restated to IFRS. Years 1998–2003 have not been restated to comply with IFRS. They are presented under Finnish Accounting Standards (FAS).
| Change | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FAS | FAS | FAS | FAS | FAS | FAS | IFRS | IFRS | IFRS | IFRS 07/06 | ||
| EUR million or as indicated | 1998 | 1999 | 2000 | 2001 | 2002 | 2003 | 2004 | 2005 | 2006 | 2007 | % |
| Sales total Fortum | 8,494 | 8,232 10,614 10,410 11,148 11,392 11,659 | 5,918 | ||||||||
| Sales continuing operations | 3,835 | 3,877 | 4,491 | 4,479 | 0 | ||||||
| EBITDA total Fortum 1) EBITDA continuing operations |
1,049 | 1,192 | 1,431 | 1,501 | 1,952 | 1,917 | 2,443 1,583 |
2,307 1,754 |
1,884 | 2,298 | 22 |
| Operating profit total Fortum | 586 | 705 | 906 | 914 | 1,289 | 1,420 | 1,916 | 1,864 | |||
| – of sales % | 6.9 | 8.6 | 8.5 | 8.8 | 11.6 | 12.5 | 16.4 | 31.5 | |||
| Operating profit continuing operations | 1,195 | 1,347 | 1,455 | 1,847 | 27 | ||||||
| – of sales % | 31.2 | 34.7 | 32.4 | 41.2 | |||||||
| Comparable operating profit continuing operations | 1,148 | 1,334 | 1,437 | 1,564 | 9 | ||||||
| Profit before income tax total Fortum | 363 | 954 | 623 | 702 | 1,008 | 1,184 | 1,700 | 1,776 | |||
| – of sales % | 4.3 | 11.6 | 5.9 | 6.7 | 9.0 | 10.4 | 14.6 | 30.0 | |||
| Profit before income tax continuing operations | 962 | 1,267 | 1,421 | 1,934 | 36 | ||||||
| – of sales % | 25.1 | 32.7 | 31.6 | 43.2 | |||||||
| Profit for the period continuing operations | 703 | 936 | 1,120 | 1,608 | 44 | ||||||
| – of which attributable to equity holders | 670 | 884 | 1,071 | 1,552 | 45 | ||||||
| Capital employed, total Fortum | 8,647 | 9,425 11,365 11,032 13,765 12,704 12,890 | |||||||||
| Capital employed continuing operations | 10,739 11,357 12,663 13,544 | 7 | |||||||||
| Interest–bearing net debt | 3,898 | 3,818 | 4,626 | 3,674 | 5,848 | 5,626 | 5,095 | 3,158 | 4,345 | 4,466 | 3 |
| Capital expenditure and gross investments in shares, total Fortum |
1,702 | 1,059 | 3,131 | 713 | 4,381 | 1,136 | 830 | 578 | 1,395 | 972 | –30 |
| – of sales % | 20.0 | 12.9 | 29.5 | 6.8 | 39.3 | 10.0 | 7.1 | 9.8 | 31.1 | 21.7 | |
| Capital expenditure and gross investments in shares continuing operations |
514 | 479 | 1,395 | 972 | –30 | ||||||
| Capital expenditure continuing operations | 335 | 346 | 485 | 655 | 35 | ||||||
| Net cash from operating activities, total Fortum | 793 | 524 | 424 | 1,145 | 1,351 | 1,577 | 1,758 | 1,404 | |||
| Net cash from operating activities continuing operations | 1,232 | 1,271 | 1,151 | 1,670 | 45 |
| Change | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FAS | FAS | FAS | FAS | FAS | FAS | IFRS | IFRS | IFRS | IFRS 07/06 | ||
| EUR million or as indicated | 1998 | 1999 | 2000 | 2001 | 2002 | 2003 | 2004 | 2005 | 2006 | 2007 | % |
| Return on capital employed, total Fortum, % | 7.7 | 8.4 | 9.4 | 8.7 | 11.1 | 11.4 | 15.8 | 16.6 | |||
| Return on capital employed continuing operations, % | 11.4 | 13.5 | 13.4 | 16.5 | |||||||
| Return on shareholders' equity, total Fortum, % | 5.7 | 7.7 | 8.6 | 8.3 | 10.5 | 12.3 | 18.2 | 18.7 | |||
| Return on shareholders' equity continuing operations, % 2) | 13.5 | 14.4 | 19.1 | ||||||||
| Interest coverage | 2.6 | 3.4 | 3.7 | 4.3 | 4.7 | 5.8 | 8.0 | 11.6 | 11.5 | 12.8 | |
| Funds from operations/interest–bearing net debt, % | 17.9 | 14.3 | 19.9 | 28.8 | 21.6 | 26.1 | 36.4 | 43.2 | 30.6 | 36.3 | |
| Gearing, % 3) | 93 | 79 | 73 | 54 | 80 | 85 | 67 | 43 | 53 | 52 | |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 3.7 | 3.2 | 3.2 | 2.4 | 3.0 | 2.9 | 2.1 | 1.4 | |||
| Net debt / EBITDA continuing operations | – | 1.8 | 2.3 | 1.9 | |||||||
| Equity–to–assets ratio, % | 36 | 39 | 43 | 48 | 41 | 40 | 44 | 49 | 48 | 49 | |
| Dividends 4) | 99 | 141 | 194 | 220 | 262 | 357 | 506 | 987 | 1,122 | 1,197 5) | 7 |
| Dividends continuing operations | 511 | 650 | 683 5) | 5 | |||||||
| Dividends additional in 2006 and 2007/ discontinued operations in 2005 |
476 | 472 | 514 5) | 9 | |||||||
| Research and development expenditure | 92 | 72 | 58 | 53 | 33 | 35 | 26 | 14 | 17 | 21 | 24 |
| – of sales % | 1.1 | 0.9 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.3 | 0.3 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.4 | 0.5 | |
| Average number of employees total Fortum | 19,003 17,461 16,220 14,803 14,053 13,343 12,859 10,026 | 8,910 | 8,304 | ||||||||
| Average number of employees continuing operations | 8,592 | 8,939 | 8,910 | 8,304 |
1) EBITDA is defined as Operating profit continuing operations + Depreciation, amortisation and impairment charges. According to Finnish Accounting Standards (FAS) share of profit of associated companies were included in operating profit. In calculating EBITDA presented under FAS share of profit of associated companies have been excluded in 1998–2003.
2) Return on equity for continuing operations for 2005 is calculated based on profit for the period from continuing operations divided by total equity at the end of the period. Profit for the period from discontinued operations has been subtracted from total equity on 31 December 2005.
3) Gearing is defined as interest-bearing net debt over shareholders' equity plus minority interest. In 2000–2002 minority interest included the preference shares amounting to EUR 1.2 billion, carrying fixed income dividend of 6.7 percent, issued by Fortum Capital Ltd.
4) In addition to cash dividend Fortum distributed approximately 85% of Neste Oil Corporation shares as dividend in 2005.
5) Board of Directors proposal for the Annual General Meeting 1 April 2008. The total amount is calculated based on the number of registered shares on 30 January 2008.
Definitions of Key Figures on pages 94 and 95.
| Change | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FAS | FAS | FAS | FAS | FAS | FAS | IFRS | IFRS | IFRS | IFRS | 07/06 | |
| EUR or as indicated | 1998 | 1999 | 2000 | 2001 | 2002 | 2003 | 2004 | 2005 | 2006 | 2007 | % |
| Earnings per share total Fortum | 0.27 | 0.41 | 0.55 | 0.57 | 0.79 | 0.91 | 1.48 | 1.55 | 1.22 | 1.74 | 35 |
| Earnings per share continuing operations |
– | – | – | – | – | – | 0.79 | 1.01 | 1.22 | 1.74 | 35 |
| Earnings per share discontinued operations |
– | – | – | – | – | – | 0.69 | 0.54 | – | – | |
| Diluted earnings per share total Fortum | – | – | 0.55 | 0.57 | 0.78 | 0.90 | 1.46 | 1.53 | 1.21 | 1.74 | 44 |
| Diluted earnings per share continuing operations |
– | – | – | – | – | – | 0.78 | 1.00 | 1.21 | 1.74 | 44 |
| Diluted earnings per share discontinued operations |
– | – | – | – | – | – | 0.68 | 0.53 | – | – | |
| Cash flow per share total Fortum | 1.01 | 0.67 | 0.54 | 1.43 | 1.60 | 1.86 | 2.06 | 1.61 | 1.31 | 1.88 | 44 |
| Cash flow per share continuing operations |
– | – | 1.44 | 1.46 | 1.31 | 1.88 | 44 | ||||
| Equity per share | 5.06 | 6.00 | 6.32 | 6.49 | 6.97 | 7.55 | 8.65 | 8.17 | 8.91 | 9.43 | 6 |
| Dividend per share total Fortum 1) | 0.13 | 0.18 | 0.23 | 0.26 | 0.31 | 0.42 | 0.58 | 1.12 | 1.26 | 1.35 2) | 7 |
| Dividend per share continuing operations |
– | – | – | – | – | – | – | 0.58 | 0.73 | 0.77 2) | 5 |
| Dividend per share additional in 2006 and 2007/ discontinued operations in 2005 |
– | – | – | – | – | – | – | 0.54 | 0.53 | 0.58 2) | 9 |
| Payout ratio total Fortum, % | 46.3 | 43.4 | 41.9 | 45.6 | 39.2 | 46.2 | 39.2 | 72.3 | 103.3 4) | 77.6 2) 4) | |
| Payout ratio continuing operations, % Payout ratio additional dividend in |
– | – | – | – | – | – | – | 57.4 3) | 59.8 4) | 44.3 2) 4) | |
| 2006and 2007/ discontinued operations in 2005, % |
– | – | – | – | – | – | – | 100.0 3) | 43.4 4) | 33.3 2) 4) | |
| Dividend yield, % | 2.5 | 4.0 | 5.3 | 5.5 | 5.0 | 5.1 | 4.3 | 7.1 | 5.8 | 4.4 2) | |
| Price/earnings ratio Fortum (P/E) | 18.5 | 10.9 | 7.9 | 8.3 | 7.9 | 9.0 | 9.2 | 10.2 | 17.7 | 17.7 | |
| Share prices | |||||||||||
| At the end of the period | 5.03 | 4.50 | 4.35 | 4.75 | 6.25 | 8.18 | 13.62 | 15.84 | 21.56 | 30.81 | |
| Average share price | 5.66 | 4.76 | 4.18 | 4.79 | 5.87 | 6.94 | 10.29 | 13.87 | 20.39 | 23.57 | |
| Lowest share price | 4.86 | 4.24 | 3.50 | 4.05 | 4.75 | 5.66 | 7.45 | 10.45 | 15.71 | 20.01 | |
| Highest share price | 6.05 | 5.80 | 4.94 | 5.70 | 6.52 | 8.75 | 13.99 | 16.90 | 23.48 | 31.44 | |
| Market capitalisation at the end of the period, EUR million |
3,949 | 3,532 | 3,456 | 4,017 | 5,286 | 6,943 | 11,810 | 13,865 | 19,132 | 27,319 | |
| Trading volumes | |||||||||||
| Number of shares, 1,000 shares | 17,643 112,398 | 93,900 134,499 251,216 270,278 478,832 900,347 | 830,764 | 787,380 | |||||||
| In relation to the weighted average number of shares, % |
2.2 | 14.3 | 11.9 | 16.8 | 29.7 | 31.9 | 59.2 | 103.2 | 94.3 | 88.5 | |
| Number of shares, 1,000 shares Number of shares excluding own shares, |
784,783 784,783 845,609 845,609 845,776 849,813 867,084 875,294 | 887,394 | 886,683 | ||||||||
| 1,000 shares Average number of shares, 1,000 shares |
NA | NA 794,571 | NA | NA | NA | NA 784,783 784,783 787,223 798,346 845,642 846,831 852,625 872,613 |
NA | NA 881,194 |
NA 889,997 |
||
| Diluted adjusted average number of | |||||||||||
| shares, 1,000 shares | – | – 787,223 798,308 851,482 858,732 861,772 887,653 | 886,929 | 891,395 |
1) In addition to cash dividend Fortum distributed approximately 85% of Neste Oil Corporation shares as dividend in 2005.
2) Board of Directors' proposal for the Annual General Meeting in April 2008.
3) 2005 payout ratio for continuing and discontinued operations are calculated based on the respective earnings per share from continuing and discontinued operations.
4) Payout ratios for dividends in 2006 and 2007 are based on the total earnings per share.
Years 1998–2003 have not been restated to comply with IFRS. They are presented under Finnish Accounting Standards (FAS). Definitions of Key Figures on pages 94 and 95.
| 2004 | 2005 | 2006 | 2007 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fortum's total power and heat generation | |||||
| Power Generation | TWh | 55.5 | 52.3 | 54.4 | 52.2 |
| Heat Generation | TWh | 25.4 | 25.1 | 25.8 | 26.1 |
| Fortum's own power generation by source, total in the Nordic countries | |||||
| Hydropower | TWh | 19.1 | 21.2 | 19.8 | 20.0 |
| Nuclear power | TWh | 25.8 | 25.8 | 24.4 | 24.9 |
| Thermal power | TWh | 9.5 | 4.2 | 9.0 | 6.2 |
| Total | TWh | 54.4 | 51.2 | 53.2 | 51.1 |
| Fortum's own power generation by source, total in the Nordic countries | |||||
| Hydropower | % | 35 | 42 | 37 | 39 |
| Nuclear power | % | 47 | 50 | 46 | 49 |
| Thermal power | % | 18 | 8 | 17 | 12 |
| Total | % | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 |
| Fortum's total electricity and heat sales | |||||
| Electricity sales | EUR mill. | 2,017 | 2,002 | 2,437 | 2,370 |
| Heat sales | EUR mill. | 809 | 867 | 1,014 | 1,096 |
| Fortum's total electricity sales by area | |||||
| Finland | TWh | 31.1 | 26.0 | 29.6 | 29.0 |
| Sweden | TWh | 27.6 | 30.4 | 28.5 | 27.6 |
| Other countries | TWh | 3.6 | 3.3 | 3.5 | 3.1 |
| Total | TWh | 62.3 | 59.7 | 61.6 | 59.7 |
| Fortum's total heat sales by area | |||||
| Finland | TWh | 10.5 | 9.8 | 10.7 | 11.1 |
| Sweden | TWh | 9.6 | 9.5 | 9.3 | 9.2 |
| Other countries | TWh | 3.7 | 4.5 | 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Total | TWh | 23.8 | 23.8 | 26.8 | 27.1 |
| Volume of distributed electricity in distribution networks | |||||
| Finland | TWh | 6.2 | 6.3 | 7.7 | 9.2 |
| Sweden | TWh | 14.2 | 14.4 | 14.4 | 14.3 |
| Norway | TWh | 2.1 | 2,2 | 2.3 | 2.3 |
| Estonia | TWh | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.2 |
| Total | TWh | 22.7 | 23.1 | 24.6 | 26.0 |
As from 2005, Fortum applies International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) for the annual and interim reports. The 2005 annual report included one comparison year 2004, which was restated to IFRS. Segment numbers are presented based only on IFRS for
comparison purposes, because in the transition to IFRS reportable segments were redefined and segment reporting as such was reassessed.
| Sales by segment, EUR million | 2004 | 2005 | 2006 | 2007 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Generation | 2,084 | 2,058 | 2,439 | 2,350 |
| – of which internal | 128 | –97 | –133 | 323 |
| Heat | 1,025 | 1,063 | 1,268 | 1,356 |
| – of which internal | 49 | –12 | –32 | 38 |
| Distribution | 707 | 707 | 753 | 769 |
| – of which internal | 10 | –8 | 8 | 9 |
| Markets | 1,387 | 1,365 | 1,912 | 1,683 |
| – of which internal | 92 | –101 | 149 | 155 |
| Other | 90 | 91 | 78 | 81 |
| – of which internal | 93 | –63 | 62 | 72 |
| Eliminations | –1,458 | –1,407 | –1,959 | –1,760 |
| Total | 3,835 | 3,877 | 4,491 | 4,479 |
| Comparable operating profit by segment, EUR million | 2004 | 2005 | 2006 | 2007 |
| Power Generation | 730 | 854 | 985 | 1,093 |
| Heat | 207 | 253 | 253 | 290 |
| Distribution | 240 | 244 | 250 | 231 |
| Markets | 23 | 30 | –4 | –1 |
| Other | –52 | –47 | –47 | –49 |
| Comparable operating profit | 1,148 | 1,334 | 1,437 | 1,564 |
| Non-recurring items | 18 | 30 | 61 | 250 |
| Other items effecting comparability | 29 | –17 | –43 | 33 |
| Operating profit | 1,195 | 1,347 | 1,455 | 1,847 |
| Depreciation, amortisation and impairment charges by segment, EUR million | 2004 | 2005 | 2006 | 2007 |
| Power Generation | 104 | 112 | 108 | 102 |
| Heat | 124 | 123 | 144 | 163 |
| Distribution | 133 | 145 | 147 | 162 |
| Markets | 16 | 15 | 19 | 11 |
| Other | 11 | 12 | 11 | 13 |
| Total | 388 | 407 | 429 | 451 |
| Share of profits in associates and joint ventures by segment, EUR million | 2004 | 2005 | 2006 | 2007 |
| Power Generation | –18 | 23 | 30 | 196 |
| Heat | 15 | 11 | 23 | 24 |
| Distribution | 16 | 20 | 15 | 18 |
| Markets | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| Other | –1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 12 | 55 | 69 | 241 |
| Capital expenditure by segment, EUR million | 2004 | 2005 | 2006 | 2007 |
| Power Generation | 84 | 83 | 95 | 93 |
| Heat | 123 | 124 | 184 | 309 |
| Distribution | 106 | 115 | 183 | 236 |
| Markets | 10 | 10 | 8 | 3 |
| Other | 12 | 14 | 15 | 14 |
| Total | 335 | 346 | 485 | 655 |
| Gross investments in shares by segment, EUR million | 2004 | 2005 | 2006 | 2007 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Generation | 126 | 47 | 145 | 297 |
| Heat | 53 | 87 | 589 | 18 |
| Distribution | 0 | – | 130 | 1 |
| Markets | 0 | – | 6 | 0 |
| Other | 0 | – | 40 | 1 |
| Total | 179 | 134 | 910 | 317 |
| Net assets by segment, EUR million | 2004 | 2005 | 2006 | 2007 |
| Power Generation | 6,218 | 5,954 | 6,734 | 7,148 |
| Heat | 2,440 | 2,551 | 3,407 | 3,507 |
| Distribution | 3,091 | 3,021 | 3,412 | 3,243 |
| Markets | 194 | 228 | 176 | 247 |
| Other and Eliminations | –43 | 139 | 85 | 140 |
| Total | 11,900 | 11,893 | 13,814 | 14,285 |
| Return on net assets by segment, % | 2004 | 2005 | 2006 | 2007 |
| Power Generation | 12.1 | 14.0 | 16.1 | 19.2 |
| Heat | 9.8 | 11.6 | 9.6 | 9.3 |
| Distribution | 8.1 | 8.8 | 8.4 | 14.5 |
| Markets | 25.3 | 17.4 | –1.6 | 6.9 |
| Comparable return on net assets by segment, % | 2004 | 2005 | 2006 | 2007 |
| Power Generation | 11.5 | 14.5 | 16.9 | 17.7 |
| Heat | 9.3 | 11.0 | 9.2 | 9.2 |
| Distribution | 8.3 | 8.6 | 8.3 | 7.5 |
| Markets | 17.1 | 16.4 | –0.8 | –0.6 |
| Average number of personnel | 2004 | 2005 | 2006 | 2007 |
| Power Generation | 4,588 | 4,374 | 4,147 | 3,475 |
| Heat | 1,605 | 2,186 | 2,345 | 2,302 |
| Distribution | 995 | 1,008 | 983 | 1,060 |
| Markets | 682 | 745 | 825 | 936 |
| Other | 722 | 626 | 610 | 531 |
| Total | 8,592 | 8,939 | 8,910 | 8,304 |
| EBITDA (Earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortisation) continuing operations |
= | Operating profit continuing operations + Depreciation, amortisation and impairment charges continuing operations |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Comparable operating profit | = | Operating profit – non-recurring items – other items effecting comparability |
|
| Non-recurring items | = | Mainly capital gains and losses | |
| Other items effecting comparability | = | Includes effects from financial derivatives hedging future cash-flows where hedge accounting is not applied according to IAS 39 and effects from the accounting of Fortum's part of the State Nuclear Waste Management Fund where the asset in the balance sheet cannot exceed the related liabilities according to IFRIC interpretation 5. |
|
| Funds from operations (FFO) | = | Net cash from operating activities before change in working capital | |
| Capital expenditure | = | Capitalised investments in property, plant and equipment and intangible assets including maintenance, productivity, growth and investments required by legislation including borrowing costs capitalised during construction period. Maintenance investments expand lifetime of an existing asset, maintain useage/availability and/or maintains reliability. Productivity improves productivity an existing asset. Growth investments' purpose is to build new assets and/or to increase customer base within existing businesses. Legislation investments are done at certain point of time due to legal requirements. |
|
| Gross investments in shares | = | Subsidiary shares, shares in associated companies and other shares in available for sale financial assets. Investments in subsidiary shares are net of cash and grossed with interest-bearing liabilities in the acquired company. |
|
| Return on shareholders' equity, % | = | Profit for the year | × 100 |
| Total equity average | |||
| Return on capital employed, % | = | Profit before taxes + interest and other financial expenses Capital employed average |
× 100 |
| Return on capital employed continuing operations, % = | Profit before taxes continuing operations + interest and other financial expenses continuing operations Capital employed continuing operations average |
× 100 | |
| Return on net assets, % | = | Operating profit + Share of profit (loss) in associated companies and joint ventures Net assets average |
× 100 |
| Comparable return on net assets, % | = | Comparable operating profit + Share of profit (loss) in associated companies and joint ventures (adjusted for IAS 39 effects) Comparable net assets average |
× 100 |
| Capital employed | = | Total assets – non-interest bearing liabilities – deferred tax liabilities – provisions |
|
| Net assets | = | Non-interest bearing assets + interest-bearing assets related to the State Nuclear Waste Management Fund – non-interest bearing liabilities – provisions (non-interest bearing assets and liabilities do not include finance related items, tax and deferred tax and assets and liabilities from fair valuations of derivatives where hedge accounting is applied) |
| Comparable net assets | = Net assets adjusted for non-interest bearing assets and liabilities arising from financial derivatives hedging future cash-flows where hedge accounting is not applied according to IAS 39 |
|||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Interest-bearing net debt | = | Interest-bearing liabilities – cash and cash equivalents | ||||
| Interest-bearing net debt | ||||||
| Gearing, % | = | Total equity | × 100 | |||
| Equity-to-assets ratio, % | = | Total equity including minority interest | × 100 | |||
| Total assets | ||||||
| Net debt / EBITDA | = | Interest-bearing net debt | ||||
| Operating profit + Depreciation, amortisation and impairment charges | ||||||
| Interest-bearing net debt | ||||||
| Net debt / EBITDA continuing operations | = | Operating profit continuing operations + Depreciation, amortisation and impairment charges continuing operations |
||||
| Operating profit | ||||||
| Interest coverage | = | Net interest expenses | ||||
| Earnings per share (EPS) | Profit for the period – minority interest | |||||
| Average number of shares during the period | ||||||
| Cash flow per share | = | Net cash from operating activities | ||||
| Average number of shares during the period | ||||||
| Equity per share | = | Shareholders' equity | ||||
| Number of shares at the end of the period | ||||||
| Payout ratio, % | = | Dividend per share | × 100 | |||
| Earnings per share | ||||||
| Payout ratio continuing operations, % | = | Dividend per share continuing operation | × 100 | |||
| Earnings per share continuing operation | ||||||
| Dividend yield, % | = | Dividend per share | × 100 | |||
| Share price at the end of the period | ||||||
| Price/earnings (P/E) ratio | = | Share price at the end of the period | ||||
| Earnings per share | ||||||
| Average share price | = | Amount traded in euros during the period | ||||
| Number of shares traded during the period | ||||||
| Market capitalisation | = | Number of shares at the end of the period × share price at the end of the period |
||||
| Trading volumes | = | Number of shares traded during the period in relation to the weighted average number of shares during the period |
| EUR million | Note | 2007 | 2006 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sales | 2 | 84 | 82 |
| Other income | 3 | 15 | 5 |
| Employee costs | 4 | –51 | –45 |
| Depreciation, amortisation and write-downs |
–11 | –8 | |
| Other expenses | –62 | –65 | |
| Operating profit | –25 | –31 | |
| Financial income and expenses | 5 | 1,797 | 38 |
| Profit after financial items | 1,772 | 7 | |
| Group contributions 1) | 724 | 638 | |
| Profit before income taxes | 2,496 | 645 | |
| Income tax expense | 6 | –145 | –123 |
| Profit for the period | 2,351 | 522 |
1) Taxable profits transferred from Finnish subsidiaries.
| EUR million | Note | 2007 | 2006 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Assets | |||
| Non-current assets | 7 | ||
| Intangible assets | 17 | 15 | |
| Property, plant and equipment | 13 | 12 | |
| Investments in group companies | 12,255 | 11,605 | |
| Interest-bearing receivables from group companies |
1,978 | 2,159 | |
| Investments in associated companies | 0 | 0 | |
| Interest-bearing receivables from associated companies |
1 | 2 | |
| Other non-current assets | 3 | 2 | |
| Total non-current assets | 14,267 | 13,795 | |
| Current assets | |||
| Trade and other receivables from group companies |
8 | 768 | 673 |
| Trade and other receivables from associated companies |
8 | 0 | 0 |
| Trade and other receivables | 8 | 126 | 43 |
| Deferred tax assets | – | 2 | |
| Cash and cash equivalents | 9 | 372 | 73 |
| Total current assets | 1,266 | 791 | |
| Total assets | 15,533 | 14,586 |
| Note | 2007 | 2006 |
|---|---|---|
| 11 | ||
| 3,040 | 3,023 | |
| 0 | 0 | |
| 2,822 | 2,822 | |
| 768 | 1,543 | |
| 2,351 | 522 | |
| 8,981 | 7,910 | |
| 1 | 1 | |
| 12 | 3,821 | 3,540 |
| 12 | 1,831 | 2,528 |
| 12 | 172 | 164 |
| 19 | 27 | |
| 5,843 | 6,259 | |
| 12 | 542 | 71 |
| 13 | 32 | 135 |
| 13 | 7 | 5 |
| 13 | 125 | 205 |
| 2 | – | |
| 708 | 416 | |
| 6,551 | 6,675 | |
Total equity and liabilities 15,533 14,586
| EUR million | 2007 | 2006 |
|---|---|---|
| Cash flow from operating activities | ||
| Profit for the period | 2,351 | 522 |
| Adjustments: | ||
| Income tax expense | 145 | 123 |
| Group contributions | –725 | –638 |
| Financial costs – net | –1,797 | –38 |
| Depreciation, amortisation and write-downs | 11 | 9 |
| Operating profit before depreciations | –15 | –22 |
| Non-cash flow items and divesting activities | 2 | 2 |
| Interest and other financial income | 151 | 134 |
| Interest and other financial expenses paid, net | –291 | –217 |
| Dividend income | 1,939 | 156 |
| Group contribution received | 638 | 482 |
| Realised foreign exchange gains and losses | –261 | 220 |
| Income taxes paid | –108 | –158 |
| Funds from operations | 2,055 | 597 |
| Increase/decrease in trade and other short-term receivables |
–7 | –15 |
| Decrease/increase in trade and other short-term payables |
5 | –42 |
| Change in working capital | –2 | –57 |
| Net cash from operating activities | 2,053 | 540 |
| Cash flow from investing activities | ||
| Capital expenditures | –14 | –15 |
| Acquisition of shares and capital contributions in subsidiaries |
–650 | –6,439 |
| Acquisition of other shares | –1 | 0 |
| Proceeds from sales of fixed assets | 3 | 1 |
| Proceeds from sales of shares in associates | 1 | 3 |
| Change in interest-bearing receivables and other non-current assets |
182 | 5,655 |
| Net cash used in investing activities | –479 | –795 |
| Cash flow before financing activities | 1,574 | –255 |
| Cash flow from financing activities | ||
| Proceeds from long-term liabilities | 210 | 1,338 |
| Payment of long-term liabilities | –37 | –725 |
|---|---|---|
| Change in short-term liabilities | –167 | 41 |
| Proceeds from stock options exercised | 17 | 49 |
| Repurchase of own shares | –175 | –31 |
| Dividends paid | –1,122 | –987 |
| Net cash used in financing activities | –1,274 | –315 |
| Net increase (+) /decrease (–) in cash and cash equivalents |
300 | –570 |
|---|---|---|
| Cash and cash equivalents at the beginning of the period |
73 | 643 |
| Cash and cash equivalents at the end of the period |
373 | 73 |
| Net increase (+) /decrease (–) in cash and cash equivalents |
300 | –570 |
The Financial Statements of Fortum Oyj are prepared in accordance with Finnish Accounting Standards (FAS).
Sales include sales revenues from actual operations and exchange rate differences on trade receivables, less discounts and indirect taxes such as value added tax.
Other income includes gains on the sales of tangible assets and shareholdings, as well as all other income not related to the sales of products or services, such as rents.
Transactions denominated in foreign currencies have been valued using the exchange rate at the date of the transaction. Receivables and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies outstanding on the balance sheet date have been valued using the exchange rate quoted on the balance sheet date. Exchange rate differences have been entered in the financial net in the income statement.
Fortum Oyj enters into derivative contracts mainly for hedging foreign exchange and interest rate exposures.
Derivatives used to hedge balance sheet items e.g. bank accounts, loans or receivables are valued employing the exchange rate quoted on the balance sheet date, and gains or losses are recognised in the income statement. The interest element on forward contracts is accrued for the period.
Option premiums are treated as advances paid or received until the option matures, and any losses on options entered into other than for hedging purposes are entered as an expense in the income statement.
Interest income or expense for derivatives used to hedge the interest rate risk exposure is accrued over the period to maturity and is recognised as an adjustment to the interest expense of the liabilities.
Income taxes presented in the income statement consist of accrued taxes for the financial year and tax adjustments for prior years.
The balance sheet value of property, plant and equipment consists of historical costs less depreciation and other deductions. Property, plant and equipment are depreciated using straight-line depreciation based on the expected useful life of the asset.
Buildings and structures 15–40 years Machinery and equipment 3–15 years Other intangible assets 5–10 years
Pension expenses
Statutory pension obligations are covered through a compulsory pension insurance policy or Group's own pension fund. Payments to Group's pension fund are recorded in the income statement in amounts determined by the pension fund according to the actuarial assumptions pursuant to the Finnish Employees' Pension Act.
Costs related to the Fortum long-term incentive plans are accrued over the plan period and the related liability is booked to the balance sheet. Since 2006 the premium basis for social charges has changed, and there is no obligation to pay social charges from the option income anymore.
Foreseeable future expenses and losses that have no corresponding revenue to which Fortum is committed or obliged to settle, and whose monetary value can be reasonably assessed, are entered as expenses in the income statement and included as provisions in the balance sheet.
| EUR million | 2007 | 2006 |
|---|---|---|
| Finland | 81 | 66 |
| Sweden and other countries | 3 | 16 |
| Total | 84 | 82 |
| EUR million | 2007 | 2006 |
|---|---|---|
| Gain on sales of shareholdings | 1 | – |
| Rental income and other | 14 | 5 |
| Total | 15 | 5 |
| EUR million | 2007 | 2006 |
|---|---|---|
| Personnel expenses | ||
| Wages, salaries and remunerations | 36 | 34 |
| Indirect employee costs | ||
| Pension costs | 12 | 6 |
| Other indirect employee costs | 2 | 2 |
| Other personnel expenses | 1 | 3 |
| Total | 51 | 45 |
| Salaries and remunerations | ||
| President and CEO, members of the Board of Directors and the Supervisory Board |
2 | 2 |
| Average number of employees | 594 | 565 |
| EUR million | 2007 | 2006 |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend income from group companies | 1,939 | 147 |
| Interest and other financial income from group companies |
127 | 121 |
| Interest and other financial income | 24 | 17 |
| Exchange rate differences | 6 | –21 |
| Interest and other financial expenses to group companies |
–112 | –84 |
| Interest and other financial expenses | –187 | –142 |
| Total | 1,797 | 38 |
| Interest income | 151 | 137 |
|---|---|---|
| Interest expenses | –292 | –221 |
| Interest net | –141 | –84 |
| EUR million | 2007 | 2006 |
|---|---|---|
| Taxes on regular business operations | –43 | –43 |
| Taxes on group contributions | 188 | 166 |
| Total | 145 | 123 |
| Current taxes for the period | 140 | 129 |
| Current taxes for prior periods | 0 | –5 |
| Changes in deferred tax | 5 | –1 |
| Total | 145 | 123 |
| Intangible | |
|---|---|
| EUR million | assets total |
| Cost 1 January 2007 | 29 |
| Additions | 8 |
| Disposals | –3 |
| Cost 31 December 2007 | 34 |
| Accumulated depreciation 1 January 2007 | 14 |
| Disposals | –3 |
| Depreciation for the period | 6 |
| Accumulated depreciation 31 December 2007 | 17 |
| Carrying amount 31 December 2007 | 17 |
| Carrying amount 31 December 2006 | 15 |
| Buildings and structures |
Machinery and equipment |
Advances paid and construction |
Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EUR million | in progress | |||
| Cost 1 January 2007 | 1 | 21 | 3 | 25 |
| Additions | – | 7 | 2 | 9 |
| Disposals | – | –1 | –3 | –4 |
| Cost 31 December 2007 | 1 | 27 | 2 | 30 |
| Accumulated depreciation 1 January 2007 | 0 | 13 | – | 13 |
| Disposals | – | –1 | – | –1 |
| Depreciation for the period | 0 | 5 | – | 5 |
| Accumulated depreciation 31 December 2007 | 0 | 17 | – | 17 |
| Carrying amount 31 December 2007 | 1 | 10 | 2 | 13 |
| Carrying amount 31 December 2006 | 1 | 8 | 3 | 12 |
| EUR million | Shares in Group companies |
Receivables from Group companies |
Shares in associated companies |
Receivables from associated companies |
Other non current assets |
Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 January 2007 | 11,605 | 2,159 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 13,768 |
| Additions 1) | 650 | 1,568 | – | 0 | 1 | 2,219 |
| Disposals | – | –1,750 | – | 0 | – | –1,750 |
| 31 December 2007 | 12,255 | 1,977 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 14,237 |
1) Additions regarding shares comprise acquisitions of shares and capital contributions.
| EUR million | 2007 | 2006 |
|---|---|---|
| Trade and other receivables from group companies |
||
| Trade receivables | 33 | 25 |
| Other receivables | 724 | 638 |
| Accrued income and prepaid expenses | 11 | 10 |
| Total | 768 | 673 |
| Trade and other receivables from associated companies |
||
| Accrued income and prepaid expenses | 0 | 0 |
| Trade and other receivables | ||
| Trade receivables | 1 | 1 |
| Other receivables | 1 | 2 |
| Accrued income and prepaid expenses | 124 | 40 |
| Total | 126 | 43 |
| EUR million | 2007 | 2006 |
|---|---|---|
| Cash at bank and in hand | 372 | 73 |
For the President and CEO and the members of the Fortum Management Team, the retirement age is 60. The pension obligations are covered either through insurance companies or Fortum Pension Fund. See also Note 36 to the Consolidated Financial Statement.
| Share | Share | Share | Retained | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EUR million | capital | issue | premium | earnings | |
| Total equity 31 December 2006 | 3,023 | 0 | 2,822 | 2,065 | 7,910 |
| Stock options exercised | 17 | 0 | – | – | 17 |
| Cash dividend | – | – | – | –1,122 | –1,122 |
| Repurchase of own shares | – | – | – | –175 | –175 |
| Profit for the period | – | – | – | 2,351 | 2,351 |
| Total equity 31 December 2007 | 3,040 | 0 | 2,822 | 3,119 | 8,981 |
| Total equity 31 December 2005 | 2,976 | 2 | 2,818 | 2,561 | 8,357 |
| Stock options exercised | 47 | –2 | 4 | – | 49 |
| Cash dividend | – | – | – | –987 | –987 |
| Repurchase of own shares | – | – | – | –31 | –31 |
| Profit for the period | – | – | – | 522 | 522 |
| Total equity 31 December 2006 | 3,023 | 0 | 2,822 | 2,065 | 7,910 |
| EUR million | 2007 | 2006 | |||
| Distributable funds 31 December | 3,119 | 2,065 |
| EUR million | 2007 | 2006 |
|---|---|---|
| Bonds | 2,865 | 2,782 |
| Loans from financial institutions | 280 | 98 |
| Other long-term interest-bearing debt | 676 | 660 |
| Total long-term interest-bearing debt | 3,821 | 3,540 |
| Current portion of long-term bonds | 541 | 10 |
| Current portion of loans from financial institutions |
1 | 5 |
| Commercial papers | – | 55 |
| Other short-term interest-bearing debt | 0 | 1 |
| Total short-term interest-bearing debt | 542 | 71 |
| Total external interest-bearing debt | 4,363 | 3,611 |
| EUR million | 2007 | 2006 |
|---|---|---|
| Bonds | 1,519 | 1,248 |
| Loans from financial institutions | 131 | 52 |
| Other long-term liabilities | 676 | 660 |
| Total | 2,326 | 1,960 |
| EUR million | 2007 | 2006 |
|---|---|---|
| Interest-bearing liabilities to group companies | 17 | 17 |
| Interest-bearing liabilities to associated companies |
172 | 164 |
| Total | 189 | 181 |
| 542 |
|---|
| 265 |
| 499 |
| 254 |
| 477 |
| 2,326 |
| 4,363 |
| EUR million | 2007 | 2006 |
|---|---|---|
| Trade and other payables to group companies | ||
| Trade payables | 7 | 1 |
| Other liabilities | 19 | 127 |
| Accruals and deferred income | 6 | 7 |
| Total | 32 | 135 |
| Trade and other payables to associated companies |
||
| Accruals and deferred income | 7 | 5 |
| Total | 7 | 5 |
| Trade and other payables | ||
| Trade payables | 10 | 8 |
| Other liabilities | 3 | 2 |
| Other short-term accruals and deferred income |
112 | 195 |
| Total | 125 | 205 |
| EUR million | 2007 | 2006 |
|---|---|---|
| On own behalf | ||
| Other contingent liabilities | 3 | 5 |
| On behalf of group companies | ||
| Guarantees | 544 | 460 |
| On behalf of others | ||
| Guarantees | 4 | 6 |
| Contingent liabilities total | 551 | 471 |
| EUR million | 2007 | 2006 |
|---|---|---|
| Lease payments | ||
| Not later than 1 year | 1 | 1 |
| Later than 1 year and not later than 5 years | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 1 | 2 |
| 2007 | 2006 | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EUR million | Contract or notional value |
Fair value |
Not recog nised as an income |
Contract or notional value |
Fair value |
Not recog nised as an income |
| Forward rate agreement | 741 | 0 | 0 | – | – | – |
| Interest rate swaps | 3,476 | –16 | –26 | 2,245 | 11 | –6 |
| Forward foreign exchange contracts 1) | 13,158 | 41 | 8 | 12,756 | –38 | 5 |
| Currency swaps | 3,191 | 76 | –2 | 2,358 | –63 | 7 |
1) Includes also closed forward and future positions
Parent company's distributable equity as of 31 December 2007 amounted to EUR 3,119,070,357.96. After the end of the financial period there have been no material changes in the financial position of the Company.
The Board of Directors proposes to the Annual General Meeting that Fortum Corporation pay a cash dividend of
EUR 1.35 per share for 2007, totalling EUR 1,197 million based on the number of registered shares as of 30 January 2008. Of this total dividend, EUR 0.77 per share is to be paid from Fortum's recurring earnings. An additional dividend of EUR 0.58 per share is proposed in order to steer Fortum's capital structure towards the agreed target.
Espoo, 30 January 2008
Peter Fagernäs
Esko Aho Birgitta Johansson-Hedberg
Birgitta Kantola Matti Lehti
Marianne Lie Christian Ramm-Schmidt
Mikael Lilius President and CEO
We have audited the accounting records, the financial statements, the Operating and Financial Review and the administration of Fortum Corporation for the period 1.1.–31.12.2007. The Board of Directors and the The President and CEO have prepared the consolidated financial statements, prepared in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards as adopted by the EU, as well as the Operating and Financial Review and the parent company's financial statements, prepared in accordance with prevailing regulations in Finland, containing the parent company's balance sheet, income statement, cash flow statement and notes to the financial statements. Based on our audit, we express an opinion on the consolidated financial statements, as well as on the parent company's financial statements, the Operating and Financial Review, and the administration.
The audit has been conducted in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards. In our audit we have examined the bookkeeping and accounting principles, contents and presentation sufficiently enough in order to evaluate that the financial statements and the Operating and Financial Review are free of material misstatements or deficiencies. In our audit of the administration we have evaluated if the actions of the members of the Supervisory Board and Board of Directors and the The President and CEO of the parent company have legally complied with the rules of the Companies Act.
The consolidated financial statements, prepared in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards as adopted by the EU, give a true and fair view, as defined in those standards and in the Accounting Act, of the consolidated results of operations as well as of the financial position.
The parent company's financial statements and the report of the Board of Directors have been prepared in accordance with the Accounting Act and other applicable rules and regulations governing the preparation of financial statements and the Operating and Financial Review.
The consolidated financial statements and parent company's financial statements and the Operating and Financial Review give a true and fair view, as defined in the Accounting Act, of the group and parent company's result of operations as well as of the financial position. The Operating and Financial Review is consistent with the financial statements.
The consolidated financial statements and the parent company's financial statements can be adopted and the members of the Supervisory Board and the Board of Directors and the The President and CEO of the parent company can be discharged from liability for the period audited by us. The proposal by the Board of Directors regarding the treatment of distributable funds is in compliance with the Companies Act.
Espoo, January 30, 2008
Deloitte & Touche Ltd Authorized Public Audit Firm
Mikael Paul
APA
The Supervisory Board has today in their meeting reviewed Fortum Corporation's income statement, balance sheet and notes to the financial statements for the year 2007 as well as consolidated financial statements, the Board of Director's proposal for the distribution of earnings and the auditors' report provided by the Company's auditors. The Supervisory Board has no comments to make on these.
The Supervisory Board recommends that the income statement, balance sheet and consolidated financial statements can be approved and concurs with the Board of Director's proposal for the allocation of profit.
The Supervisory Board states that it has received adequate information from the Board of Directors and the company's management.
Espoo, 6 February 2008
Timo Kalli
Martti Alakoski Lasse Hautala Rakel Hiltunen
Mikko Immonen Kimmo Kiljunen Jari Koskinen
Sirpa Paatero Oras Tynkkynen Ben Zyskowicz
Design KREAB Photograph TOMI PARKKONEN Printing LIBRIS 2008 Wrapping paper GALERIE ART SILK 150 g/m2 Cover paper GALERIE ART SILK 300 g/m2 Inside pages GALERIE ONE SILK 90 g/m2
Fortum Corporation Keilaniemi, Espoo POB 1 00048 FORTUM, Finland tel. +35810 4511 fax +35810 4524447 www.fortum.com
Domicile Espoo, Business ID 1463611-4
Building tools?
Free accounts include 100 API calls/year for testing.
Have a question? We'll get back to you promptly.