Finnair Oyj

Investor Presentation • May 7, 2009

Press Release, May 07, 2009 Monthly traffic performance data –April 2009

Fall in demand continues, weakening of price level gathers pace

In April, Finnair's scheduled passenger traffic declined by 5.7 per cent from the previous year. At the same time, capacity was cut by 9.4 per cent, which improved passenger load factor by 2.8 percentage points to 71.2 per cent.

Demand has fallen in all types of traffic, and particularly in domestic traffic, where flying has declined by nearly one fifth. In Asian traffic, capacity has been cut by nearly seven per cent and in European traffic by around 12 per cent.

"Through capacity cuts we have maintained load factors at a reasonable level. The problem, however, is an acceleration of the fall in average prices, resulting from a sharp reduction in business travel," says Finnair's SVP Communications Christer Haglund.

Finnair's leisure traffic grew in April by 24.3 per cent compared with April last year. Capacity increased by a similar figure. The reason for the substantial growth was the continuation of traffic to Thailand for longer than last year. Leisure traffic growth of similar magnitude in May is not expected.

In April Finnair's cargo traffic declined by 23.2 per cent. Cargo demand was directed for the most part at long-haul flights.

Of Finnair's flights, 89.6 per cent arrived on schedule, which represents an improvement of 6.4 percentage points from last year. The scheduled passenger traffic punctuality percentage rose from April last year by 6.2 percentage points to 91.2 per cent.

Finnair traffic

• Finnair traffic altogether decreased by 0.4%, measured in revenue passenger kilometres. Capacity decreased by 4.0%. Passenger load factor was 2.6 percentage points higher than year before, 72.4%. Number of passengers carried decreased by 7.3% and was 617 132.

Scheduled traffic

• • Scheduled traffic decreased by 5.7%, measured in revenue passenger kilometres. Capacity decreased by 9.4%. Passenger load factor was 2.8 percentage points higher than year before, 71.2%. Number of passengers carried decreased by 10.7% and was 529 951.
• • Scheduled international traffic, decreased by 4.9%, measured in revenue passenger kilometres. Capacity decreased by 8.6%. Passenger load factor was 2.7 percentage points higher than year before, 71.8%. Number of passengers carried decreased by 8.5% and was 397 494.

Passenger load factors by Traffic category April 2009 vs April 2008

%

AP RIL 08
AP RIL 09

0,0 10,0 20,0 30,0 40,0 50,0 60,0 70,0 80,0 90,0 Total system Europe North Atlantic Asia Domestic Scheduled Leisure

Changes in Traffic and Capacity April 2009 vs April 2008

ASKRPK

Press Release, May 07, 2009 Monthly traffic performance data –April 2009

• European scheduled traffic, decreased by 5.8%, measured in revenue passenger kilometres. Capacity decreased by 11.8%. Passenger load factor was 4.3 percentage points higher than year before, 67.1%. Number of passengers carried decreased by 9.9% and was 301 012.
• North Atlantic scheduled traffic decreased by 3.0%, measured in revenue passenger kilometres. Capacity increased by 0.5%. Passenger load factor was 2.7 percentage points lower than year before, 73.9%. Number of passengers carried decreased by 3.0% and was 10 892.
• Asian scheduled traffic decreased by 4.5%, measured in revenue passenger kilometres. Capacity decreased by 6.9%. Passenger load factor was 1.8 percentage points higher than year before, 75.3%. Number of passengers carried decreased by 4.1% and was 85 590.
• • Domestic scheduled traffic decreased by -16.3%, measured in revenue passenger kilometres. Capacity decreased by -19.4%. Passenger load factor was 2.3 percentage points lower than year before, 62.5%. Number of passengers carried decreased by - 16.7% and was 132 457.

Leisure traffic

• Leisure traffic increased by 24.3%, measured in revenue passenger kilometres. Capacity increased by 24.7%. Passenger load factor was 0.2 percentage points lower than year before, 77.4%. Number of passengers carried increased by 20.1% and was 87 181.

Cargo

• •Cargo traffic decreased by 23.2% in terms of cargo tonnes carried.
• • Decrease in scheduled traffic was 22.2%. Cargo traffic decreased by 22.5% in Asian traffic, by 19.2% in European traffic and decreased by 27.3% in North-Atlantic traffic.

Cargo traffic carried on chartered cargo flights decreased by 66.8%. The cargo load factor in the Far Eastern traffic was 67.9% and in the North Atlantic traffic 58.9%.

TO TA L TR AF FI C	AP R0 9	AP R0 8	CH G %	JA N - AP R0 9	JA N - AP R0 8	CH G %
( ) AS K Mi lj.	2 1 24	2 2 14	0 -4 ,	9 5 33	9 7 29	-2 0 ,
( ) RP K Mi lj.	1 5 39	1 5 46	-0 4 ,	7 1 63	7 1 72	-0 1 ,
Pa ss en g er loa d f to ac r	72 4 % ,	69 8 % ,	2, 6 p u	75 1 % ,	73 7 % ,	1, 4 p u
Nb f r o p as se ng er ( ) 00 0	61 7, 1	0 66 6,	3 -7 ,	2 5 07 2 ,	2 6 88 8 ,	8 -6 ,

For further information, please, contact:

Mr. Christer Haglund, SVP Corporate Communications, tel. +358 9 818 4007 Mr. Taneli Hassinen, Director, Investor Relations, tel. +358 9 818 4976 Mr. Petteri Kostermaa, VP Traffic Planning, tel. +358 9 818 8504 Mr. Timo Riihimäki, Vice President, Cargo, tel. +358 9 818 5487

Finnair Oyj Communications 07 May 2009

ATTACHMENT: 'Finnair Traffic Performance April, Financial Year 2009'

Next traffic statistics will be released on 09 June 2009

Finnair Group traffic performance April 09, Financial year 2009

The statistics include performance figures for Finnair .

	Ap r 0 9	ha C % ng e	Ja n 0 9 – Ap r 0 9	ha C % ng e		Ap r 0 9	ha C % ng e	Ja n 0 9 – Ap r 0 9	ha C % ng e
l tr f f ic To ta a					ic Do st me
0 0 0 Pa 1 sse ng ers	6 1 7, 1	-7 3 ,	2 5 0 7, 2	6, 8 -	0 0 0 Pa 1 sse ng ers	1 3 2, 5	1 6, 7 -	5 4 4, 5	1 2, 8 -
i la b le k i lom i l l Av at- etr a se es m	2 1 2 4, 4	-4 0 ,	5 3 3, 2 9	2, 0 -	i la b le k i lom i l l Av at- etr a se es m	1 2 3, 0	1 4 9, -	5 3 6, 6	1 2, 0 -
k i lom i l l Re etr ve nu e p as se ng er es m	1 5 3 8, 8	-0 4 ,	7 1 6 3, 1	0, 1 -	k i lom i l l Re etr ve nu e p as se ng er es m	7 6, 9	1 6, 3 -	3 1 5, 2	1 4, 5 -
loa d fac r % Pa to sse ng er	7 2, 4	2, 6 p	7 5, 1	1, 4 p	loa d fac r % Pa to sse ng er	6 2, 5	2, 3 p	5 8, 7	1, 7 p -
Ca o t rg on es	8 3, 0 6 7	-2 3, 2	2 0 1 1, 2 7	2 0, 6 -
i la b le k i lom i l l Av to etr a nn e- es m	3 1 8, 6	-6 3 ,	1 4 2 3, 5	2, 5 -	isu f f ic Le tra re
-k lom l l Re i i e t etr ve nu on ne es m	1 7 5, 7	-6 6 ,	7 9 1, 7	5, 2 -	Pa 1 0 0 0 sse ng ers	8 7, 2	2 0, 1	4 4 8, 3	7, 6
l l loa d fac Ov r % to era	5 5, 1	-0 2 p ,	5 5, 6	1, 6 p -	i la b le k i lom i l l Av at- etr a se es m	4 3 7, 9	2 4, 7	2 5 7 9, 3	1 4, 0
					k i lom i l l Re etr ve nu e p as se ng er es m	3 3 8, 8	2 4, 3	2 3 0 2, 1	1 2, 4
he du le d p f f ic t l Sc tra ot as se ng er a					loa d fac Pa r % to sse ng er	4 7 7,	0, 2 p -	8 3 9,	1, 2 p -
Pa 1 0 0 0 sse ng ers	5 3 0, 0	-1 0, 7	2 0 5 8, 8	4 9, -
i la b le k i lom i l l Av at- etr a se es m	1 6 8 6, 5	-9 4 ,	6 9 5 3, 9	6, 9 -	f f ic Ca o T rg ra
k lom l l Re i i etr ve nu e p as se ng er es m	1 2 0 0, 0	-5 7 ,	4 8 6 1, 0	5, 1 -	he du le d t f f l to Ca ic to ta rg o s c ra nn es	5 6 7 3, 7	2 2, 2 -	2 6 0 6 4, 8	2 0, 0 -
loa d fac Pa r % to sse ng er	1, 2 7	2, 8 p	9, 9 6	1, 3 p	- E e t ur op on es	1 4 8, 4 7	1 9, 2 -	5 9 9 8, 2	1 6, 6 -
					h A lan ic - N t t t to or ne s	4 6 8, 2	2 7, 3 -	1 9 6 4, 2	1 1, 0 -
Eu ro p e					ia - A to s ne s	4 4 1 0, 6	2 2, 5 -	1 7 1 2 1, 7	2 2, 7 -
Pa 1 0 0 0 sse ng ers	3 0 1, 0	-9 9 ,	1 0 9 0, 9	1 0, 2 -	ic - D t to om es ne s	2 1 5 6,	2 3, 9 -	9 8 0, 8	4, 9 -
i la b le k i lom i l l Av at- etr a se es m	6 4 5, 1	-1 1, 8	2 4 6 6, 5	7, 8 -	Ca le isu f f ic tra to rg o re ne s	9 0, 6	2 1 3, 3	4 3 3, 2	2 1 8, 5
k lom l l Re i i etr ve nu e p as se ng er es m	4 3 2, 9	-5 8 ,	5 1 2 0, 7	7, 6 -	he du le d c ha Sc rte r t arg o c on ne s	1 1 8, 7	6 6, 8 -	5 1 3, 2	5 9, 8 -
loa d fac Pa r % to sse ng er	7, 1 6	4, 3 p	1, 7 6	0, 1 p	l Ca o t s t ot rg on ne a	7 8 3, 0 6	2 3, 2 -	2 7 0 1 1, 2	2 0, 6 -
					i la b le k i lom i l l. Av * m o t etr a ca rg on ne es	6 6, 8	8, 1 -	3 0 1, 6	4, 1 -
h A lan ic No rt t t					k lom l l. Re i i o t etr ve nu e c arg on ne es m	3 7, 9	2 3, 9 -	1 4 8 9,	2 2, 1 -
Pa 1 0 0 0 sse ng ers	1 0, 9	-3 0 ,	4 2, 6	8, 1	loa d fac Ca r* % to rg o	5 8 6,	1 1, 8 p -	4 9, 7	1 1, 5 p -
i la b le k i lom i l l Av at- etr a se es m	9 7, 3	0, 5	3 6 1, 7	1 1, 0	*O ion l ca lcu lat ity t p p era a ory ca ac
k lom l l Re i i etr ve nu e p as se ng er es m	1, 7 9	-3 0 ,	2 8 1, 3	8, 1
loa d fac Pa r % to sse ng er	7 3, 9	-2 7 p ,	7 7, 8	2, 1 p -
ia As
Pa 1 0 0 0 sse ng ers	8 5, 6	-4 1 ,	3 8 0, 8	3, 3 -
i la b le k i lom i l l Av at- etr a se es m	8 2 1, 1	-6 9 ,	3 5 8 9, 0	6, 9 -
k lom l l Re i i etr ve nu e p as se ng er es m	1 8, 4 6	-4 5 ,	2 4 3, 7 9	3, 7 -
loa d fac Pa r % to sse ng er	7 5, 3	1, 8 p	7 5 6,	2, 5 p