AI Terminal

MODULE: AI_ANALYST
Interactive Q&A, Risk Assessment, Summarization
MODULE: DATA_EXTRACT
Excel Export, XBRL Parsing, Table Digitization
MODULE: PEER_COMP
Sector Benchmarking, Sentiment Analysis
SYSTEM ACCESS LOCKED
Authenticate / Register Log In

Finnair Oyj

Regulatory Filings Jun 8, 2010

3266_rns_2010-06-08_31b1c39a-b5ca-436b-b4cb-cd49ffe3ff06.pdf

Regulatory Filings

Open in Viewer

Opens in native device viewer

Press Release, 8 June 2010 Monthly traffic performance data – May 2010

Finnair's scheduled traffic grew 16 per cent, cargo 30 per cent

The strong growth in scheduled traffic that began in March continued in May. Scheduled traffic grew by 16 per cent from the previous year. Asian traffic demand was strengthened by 28 per cent. Passenger numbers in May totalled 590,000, which was three per cent more than a year earlier. The passenger load factor in scheduled traffic improved by around three percentage points to 70 per cent. "It's excellent that demand returned after the problems of April. Scheduled traffic demand and the passenger load factor are again moving in the right direction, but aircraft still have room for additional demand," says Finnair SVP Communications Christer Haglund.

In traffic overall, demand grew in May by ten per cent from last year, with capacity increasing by nearly eight per cent. The passenger load factor rose by one and a half percentage points to 71 per cent. Overall traffic figures include leisure traffic in addition to scheduled traffic. Demand for leisure flights fell by 21 per cent. The change in Finnair's total seat capacity for the early part of the year was –10 per cent, while demand fell by just over six per cent.

Cargo demand has developed well. The number of kilos carried rose by 30 per cent from the previous year, and on Asian routes by 37 per cent. The figures include the performance of Finnair's own MD-11 cargo aircraft, which began operating in mid-May. The cargo aircraft flies from Helsinki to Hong Kong and to Seoul in South Korea.

In May, 87.4% of all Finnair flights arrived on time, which is 4.8 percentage points less than in May last year. On-time performance percentage for scheduled traffic fell by 4.9 percentage points compared to May in the previous year, resulting in 88.5% this year.

Finnair Oyj Communications 8 June 2010

ATTACHMENT: Finnair Traffic Performance May 2010

Next traffic statistics will be released on 7 July 2010

Additional information:

Mr. Lasse Heinonen, EVP & CFO, tel. +358 9 818 4950 Mr. Christer Haglund, SVP Corporate Communications, tel. +358 9 818 4007 Mr. Taneli Hassinen, VP Financial Communications and IR, tel. +358 9 818 4976 Mr. Petteri Kostermaa, VP Traffic Planning, tel. +358 9 818 8504 Mr. Antero Lahtinen, Managing Director, Finnair Cargo, tel. +358 9 818 5400

Passenger load factors by Traffic category MAY 2010 vs May 2009

%

May09 May10

Finnair Group traffic performance May 2010

M
ay
2
0
1
0
ha
C
ng
e
%
J
M
an
ua
ry–
ay
2
0
1
0
ha
C
ng
e
%
l tr
f
f
ic
To
ta
a
ic
Do
st
me
Ca
o t
rg
on
ne
s
1
1
1
9,
5
6
2,
3
7
4
3
4
0
4
6,
2
9,
6
i
la
b
le
k
i
lom
i
l
l
Av
to
etr
a
nn
e
es
m
,
3
1
8,
8
7,
7
1
4
9
7,
4
-1
2,
9
isu
f
f
ic
Le
tra
re
Pa
1
0
0
0
sse
ng
ers
,
5
3
1,
2
6,
6
2
5
1
1,
8
-1
8
,
i
la
b
le
k
i
lom
i
l
l
Av
at
etr
a
se
es
m
,
1
8
7
8,
2
1
1,
5
8
4
2
6,
9
-2
4
,
f
f
ic
Ca
o t
rg
ra
loa
d
fac
Pa
%
to
sse
ng
er
r,
7
7,
8
1,
3 p
7
6,
1
-1
4 p
,
ia
As
Pa
1
0
0
0
sse
ng
ers
,
9
8,
8
2
8,
4
4
9
9,
0
9,
0
la
b
le
k
lom
l
l
i
i
i
Av
at
etr
a
se
es
m
,
8
3,
8
9
1
8
7,
4
5
0
3,
3
1,
8
k
i
lom
i
l
l
Re
etr
ve
nu
e p
as
se
ng
er
es
m
,
7
2
1,
8
2
7,
9
3
4
3,
1
6
1
0,
1
loa
d
fac
Pa
%
to
sse
ng
er
r,
7
3,
4
5,
8 p
8
0,
9
6,
1 p
kilo
s fl
tre
me
ow
n
M
ay
2
0
1
0
ha
C
ng
e
%
J
M
an
ua
ry–
ay
2
0
1
0
ha
C
ng
e
%
M
ay
2
0
1
0
ha
C
ng
e
%
J
M
an
ua
ry–
ay
2
0
1
0
ha
C
ng
e
%
l tr
f
f
ic
To
ta
a
ic
Do
st
me
Pa
1
0
0
0
sse
ng
ers
,
5
8
9,
1
3,
1
2
8
7
0,
2
-6
8
,
Pa
1
0
0
0
sse
ng
ers
,
9
8,
2
1,
1
5
7
3,
7
-1
0,
6
la
b
le
k
lom
l
l
Av
i
i
i
at
etr
a
se
es
m
,
2
0
8
5,
4
7,
7
1
0
3
0
1,
2
-1
0,
2
la
b
le
k
lom
l
l
Av
i
i
i
at
etr
a
se
es
m
,
8
3,
2
6,
7
5
3
4,
6
-1
3,
0
k
i
lom
i
l
l
Re
etr
ve
nu
e p
as
se
ng
er
es
m
,
1
4
7
4,
7
1
0,
2
7
9
1
3,
7
-6
3
,
k
i
lom
i
l
l
Re
etr
ve
nu
e p
as
se
ng
er
es
m
,
4
6,
1
0,
0
3
1
9,
8
-1
1,
5
loa
d
fac
%
Pa
to
sse
ng
er
r,
7
0,
7
1,
6 p
7
6,
8
3,
2 p
loa
d
fac
%
Pa
to
sse
ng
er
r,
5
5,
4
-3
7 p
,
5
9,
8
1,
1 p
Ca
o t
rg
on
ne
s
1
1
1
9,
5
6
2,
3
7
4
3
4
0
4
6,
2
9,
6
i
la
b
le
k
i
lom
i
l
l
Av
to
etr
a
nn
e
es
m
,
3
1
8,
8
7,
7
1
4
9
7,
4
-1
2,
9
isu
f
f
ic
Le
tra
re
k
lom
l
l
i
i
Re
e t
etr
ve
nu
on
ne
es
m
,
1
9
9,
7
2
7,
6
9
6
8,
0
2,
7
0
0
0
Pa
1
sse
ng
ers
,
5
7,
9
-2
0,
8
3
5
8,
3
-3
1,
3
l
l
loa
d
fac
Ov
%
to
era
r,
2,
6
6
9,
8 p
4,
6
6
9,
8 p
i
la
b
le
k
i
lom
i
l
l
Av
at
etr
a
se
es
m
,
2
0
2
7,
-1
5
7,
1
8
4,
3
7
-3
3,
8
k
i
lom
i
l
l
Re
etr
ve
nu
e p
as
se
ng
er
es
m
,
1
6
8,
4
-2
0,
9
1
6
7
3,
1
-3
1,
9
he
du
le
d p
f
f
ic t
l
Sc
tra
ot
as
se
ng
er
a
loa
d
fac
%
Pa
to
sse
ng
er
r,
8
1,
3
-3
4 p
,
8
9,
3
2,
4 p
Pa
1
0
0
0
sse
ng
ers
,
5
3
1,
2
6,
6
2
5
1
1,
8
-1
8
,
i
la
b
le
k
i
lom
i
l
l
Av
at
etr
a
se
es
m
,
1
8
7
8,
2
1
1,
5
8
4
2
6,
9
-2
4
,
f
f
ic
Ca
o t
rg
ra
k
lom
l
l
Re
i
i
etr
ve
nu
e p
as
se
ng
er
es
m
,
1
3
0
4
6,
1
1
6,
2
4
0,
6
7
4,
3
he
du
le
d t
f
f
l,
Ca
ic
to
ta
to
rg
o s
c
ra
nn
es
8
2
9
7
9,
5
7,
9
4
1
4
4
8,
8
2
8,
2
loa
d
fac
Pa
%
to
sse
ng
er
r,
9,
6
6
2,
7 p
7
4,
1
4,
8 p
Eu
to
ro
p
e,
nn
es
-
2
0
5
8,
0
4
5,
9
8
0
3
9,
7
8,
5
h
lan
ic,
No
At
rt
t
to
nn
es
-
7
5
7,
7
5
3,
0
3
3
9
1,
4
3
7,
9
Eu
ro
p
e
As
ia,
to
nn
es
-
8
2
6
7
9,
5,
6
9
2
0
8
3,
1
9
3
8
6,
Pa
1
0
0
0
sse
ng
ers
,
3
1
9,
9
2,
6
1
3
8
3,
3
-1
4
,
ic,
Do
st
to
me
nn
es
-
1
8
4,
2
-1
0,
9
9
3
4,
5
-2
1,
3
i
la
b
le
k
i
lom
i
l
l
Av
at
etr
a
se
es
m
,
6
8
9,
7
3,
9
2
9
0
3,
6
-7
2
,
f
f
Ca
le
isu
ic,
tra
to
rg
o
re
nn
es
5
7,
8
-2
7,
1
7
2
5,
1
4
1,
5
k
lom
l
l
Re
i
i
etr
ve
nu
e p
as
se
ng
er
es
m
,
4
4
4,
0
2,
5
1
0
8,
5
9
-2
3
,
f
l
hts
Ca
ig
to
rg
o
nn
es
,
1
2
3
2,
5
5
3,
2
7
1
2
3
2,
5
8
4
7,
loa
d
fac
Pa
%
to
sse
ng
er
r,
6
4,
4
-0
9 p
,
6
5,
7
3,
3 p
l
Ca
o t
s t
ot
rg
on
ne
a
1
1
1
6
9,
5
7
2,
3
4
3
4
0
6,
4
2
9,
6
la
b
le
k
lom
l
l.
i
i
i
Av
*,
o t
etr
a
ca
rg
on
ne
es
m
8
6,
9
3
6,
3
3
5
0,
3
-4
1
,
h
lan
ic
No
At
rt
t
k
lom
l
l.
Re
i
i
o t
etr
ve
nu
e c
arg
on
ne
es
m
,
6
7,
6
8
4,
3
2
5
0
9,
3
8,
9
Pa
1
0
0
0
sse
ng
ers
,
1
4,
3
1
5,
2
5
5,
9
1,
6
loa
d
fac
Ca
*,
%
to
rg
o
r
7
7,
8
2
0,
2 p
7
3,
9
2
2,
9 p
la
b
le
k
lom
l
l
i
i
i
Av
at
etr
a
se
es
m
,
1
2
1,
6
1
3,
2
4
8
5,
5
3,
5
h-
lan
loa
d
fac
ic
%
No
At
*,
rt
t
to
ca
rg
o
r
-
8
5,
5
2
7,
7 p
8
9,
8
2
8,
5 p
k
i
lom
i
l
l
Re
etr
ve
nu
e p
as
se
ng
er
es
m
,
9
4,
5
1
5,
2
3
9,
3
6
1,
6
ia
loa
d
fac
As
*,
%
to
ca
rg
o
r
-
9
4,
8
3
0,
3 p
8
5
7,
2
4 p
6,
loa
d
fac
Pa
%
to
sse
ng
er
r,
7
7,
8
1,
3 p
7
6,
1
-1
4 p
,
nal
lcu
lato
- *
= O
atio
city
per
ca
ry c
apa
  • Change %: Change compared to the figures of the respective periods in the previous year (p = percentage points) - Available seat kilometres, ASK: Total number of seats available, multiplied by the number of kilometres flown - Revenue passenger kilometres, RPK: Number of revenue passengers carried, multiplied by kilometres flown - Passenger load factor: Share of revenue passenger kilometres of available seat kilometres

  • Available tonne kilometres, ATK: Number of tonnes of capacity for carriage of passengers, cargo and mail, multiplied by kilometres flown

  • Revenue tonne kilometres, RTK: Total revenue load consisting of passengers, cargo and mail, multiplied by kilometres flown

  • Overall load factor: Share of revenue tonne kilometres of available tonne kilometres

Talk to a Data Expert

Have a question? We'll get back to you promptly.