Annual Report • Feb 20, 2015
Annual Report
Open in ViewerOpens in native device viewer
2014
| Financial performance and position 4 | |
|---|---|
| Risk management 28 | |
| Fortum share and shareholders 37 | |
| Key figures |
44 |
| Consolidated financial statements | 57 |
| Consolidated income statement 57 | |
| Consolidated statement of comprehensive income59 | |
| Consolidated balance sheet60 | |
| Consolidated statement of changes in total equity 61 | |
| Consolidated cash flow statement62 | |
| Notes to the consolidated financial statements 65 | |
| 1 Accounting policies 65 | |
| 2. Critical accounting estimates and judgements 78 | |
| 3. Financial risk management 80 | |
| 4. Capital risk management 89 | |
| 5. Segment reporting90 | |
| 6. Items affecting comparability 100 | |
| 7. Fair value changes of derivatives and underlying items in | |
| income statement 101 | |
| 8. Acquisitions and disposals102 | |
| 9. Assets held for sale 104 | |
| 10. Other income and other expenses105 | |
| 11. Materials and services 106 | |
| 12. Employee benefits107 | |
| 13. Finance costs – net113 | |
| 14. Income tax expense 115 | |
| 15. Earnings and dividend per share117 | |
| 16. Financial assets and liabilities by categories118 | |
| 17. Financial assets and liabilities by fair value hierarchy 122 | |
| 18. Intangible assets124 | |
| 19. Property, plant and equipment 125 | |
| 20. Participations in associated companies and | |
| joint ventures 129 | |
| 21. Other non-current assets136 | |
| 22. Long-term and short-term interest-bearing receivables136 | |
| 23. Inventories137 | |
| 24. Trade and other receivables137 | |
| 25. Liquid funds139 | |
| 26. Share capital139 | |
| 27. Non-controlling interests140 | |
| 28. Interest-bearing liabilities140 | |
| 29. Deferred income taxes142 | |
|---|---|
| 30. Nuclear related assets and liabilities 144 | |
| 31. Other provisions146 | |
| 32. Pension obligations147 | |
| 33. Other non-current liabilities152 | |
| 34. Trade and other payables152 | |
| 35. Pledged assets153 | |
| 36. Leasing 154 | |
| 37. Capital commitments155 | |
| 38. Contingent liabilities 155 | |
| 39. Legal actions and official proceedings156 | |
| 40. Related party transactions157 | |
| 41. Events after the balance sheet date158 | |
| 42. Subsidiaries by segment on 31 December 2014 158 | |
| Income statement 161 | |
|---|---|
| Balance Sheet 162 | |
| Cash flow statement 163 | |
| Notes to the parent company financial statement 164 | |
| 1. Accounting policies and principles 164 | |
| 2. Sales by market area165 | |
| 3. Other income165 | |
| 4. Employee costs166 | |
| 5. Financial income and expenses167 | |
| 6. Income tax expense167 | |
| 7. Non-current assets168 | |
| 8. Other current receivables169 | |
| 9. Liquid Funds170 | |
| 10. Changes in shareholders' equity 170 | |
| 11. Interest-bearing liabilities171 | |
| 12. Trade and other payables172 | |
| 13. Contingent liabilities 172 | |
| 14. Related party transactions173 | |
| Proposal for the distribution of earnings174 | |
| Auditor's report174 | |
| Quarterly financial information176 | |
| Investor information 178 |
In a challenging market environment, our result remained at a satisfactory level. The cash flow from operating activities was very strong with all divisions contributing.
The strategic assessment of the electricity distribution business and inaugurations of power plants were in focus.
| EUR million | 2014 | 2013 1) | 2012 2) | Change 14/13 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sales | 4,751 | 5,309 | 6,159 | -11% |
| Operating profit | 3,428 | 1,508 | 1,874 | 127% |
| Operating profit, % of sales | 72.2 | 28.4 | 30.4 | 154% |
| Comparable operating profit | 1,351 | 1,403 | 1,752 | -4% |
| Profit before taxes | 3,360 | 1,398 | 1,586 | 140% |
| Profit for the period attributable to owners of the parent | 3,154 | 1,204 | 1,416 | 162% |
| Earnings per share, EUR | 3.55 | 1.36 | 1.59 | 161% |
| Net cash from operating activities | 1,762 | 1,548 | 1,382 | 14% |
| Shareholders' equity per share, EUR | 12.23 | 11.28 | 11.30 | 8% |
| Capital employed | 17,918 | 19,183 | 19,420 | -7% |
| Interest-bearing net debt | 4,217 | 7,793 | 7,814 | -46% |
| Interest-bearing net debt without Värme financing | 3,664 | 6,658 | N/A | -45% |
| Equity-to-assets ratio, % | 51 | 43 | 43 | 19% |
| Average number of shares, 1,000s | 888,367 | 888,367 | 888,367 | 0% |
2) The adoption of IFRS 10 and IFRS 11 is not restated in the figures of financial period 2012.
| 2014 | 2013 1) | 2012 2) | Change 14/13 |
||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROCE, % | 12 | 19.5 | 9.0 | 10.2 | 117% |
| ROE, % | 14 | 30.0 | 12.0 | 14.6 | 150% |
| Capital structure | |||||
| Comparable net debt/EBITDA | Around 3 | 2.3 | 3.9 | 3.2 | -41% |
| Comparable net debt/EBITDA without Värme | |||||
| financing | Around 3 | 2.0 | 3.4 | N/A | -41% |
| Net debt/EBITDA | 1.1 | 3.7 | 3.1 | -70% |
2) The adoption of IFRS 10 and IFRS 11 is not restated in the figures of financial period 2012.
2014 was a challenging year for Fortum. Power prices and global macro economic performance as well as the rouble weakness – were obviously disappointing. In addition, the decline in commodity prices during the fourth quarter was unforeseen. Though commodity prices declined during the year, power prices declined less, one reason being the positive development of CO2 emission allowances market price.
Fortum's internal transformation continued to further increase our efficiency and flexibility. Fortum was able to reach a strong result largely due to its successful execution of both the efficiency programme and divestments according to plan. Fortum's 2014 results were good in a market dominated by negative drivers: low spot prices, a very weak rouble and warm weather. In the Nordic countries, electricity demand declined only somewhat,
and demand in Russia was at the same level as in 2013. Comparable operating profit was EUR 1,351 million and cash flow was strong at EUR 1,762 million in 2014.
In Russia, Fortum finalised the third unit of the Nyagan power plant; the most extensive part of the investment programme is now complete. The run-rate operating profit (EBIT) target for the Russia Segment, RUB 18.2
billion, is to be reached during 2015, while the euro-denominated result level will be volatile, mainly due to the translation effect.
In March 2014 we broadened the management team as the disvestment of the electricity distribution business strategically put the company in a new positio; major disvestment and investment programmes are still ongoing; and the company is reorganising and preparing for the changing European power markett in order to capture growth. This means that we need a wide range of competences recovering strategy, M&A and corporate relations in the management team. In addition, after succesfully finalizing our 2013-2014 efficiency programme, we see that there is internal potential to be reached.
With the restructured management team, we are able to further improve our performance and efficiency, unlock further synergies between various businesses and staff functions, and scrutinise our investment programmes in a way that gives the best returns in line with our strategy.
Preparations for future growth are starting to take shape. The Finnish and Norwegian electricity distribution businesses were divested during 2014, and the divestment of the Swedish electricity distribution business is being prepared and evaluated. Furthermore, we announced in December that we aim to increase our hydro portfolio by 60 % through the restructuring of TGC-1, Territorial Generating Company, in Russia. Provided that we obtain more than 75 % ownership in TGC-1 hydro assets, we would also be ready to participate with a minority stake (max. 15 %) in the Finnish Fennovoima nuclear power project on the same terms and conditions as the other Finnish companies currently participating in the project.
Increasing the share of hydropower is in line with our mission and strategy: We are committed to create energy that improves life for current and future generations. Therefore, we want to take a responsible approach not only short term but also long term. Through sustainable solutions and operations, we aim to deliver excellent value to our shareholders. This approach gives us a unique opportunity to be even more competitive. We believe that sustainable operations lead to good financial results, and give us a solid platform to increase shareholder value.
Fortum's strategy is based on CO2-free production: hydro, nuclear and CHP being our core competencies. In order to grow in these areas, we strive to create added value through restructuring and acquisitions.
In addition to CO2-free production, we also consider the retail business important, and are committed to growth also in this area.
In order to continue to build on our strong Nordic core, an integrated European-wide market is a key priority – in hydro, in nuclear and in CHP. Creating a solid earnings base and growth in Russia continues to be equally important.
We also aim to build a platform for future growth. Solar technology offers a clearly interesting and sustainable, CO2-free production form; we are currently researching and developing our solar technology competencies in India. In addition, we are for example studying and developing pyrolysis in Finland.
Even though the wholesale market prices for electricity have continued to decrease, various taxes, fees and subsidies are increasing end-consumers' energy costs. A predictable electricity market built on consumer participation and the utilisation of all the different energy value components as well as different producers is vital. The setup should be market-driven, commercial, predictable and harmonised in as big geographical area as possible, and it should have enough physical transmission capacity, as well as good cooperation between transmission system operators, grid companies, power exchanges etc. Giving environmental consequences the right price through CO2 would create an energy market that provides security of supply, competitiveness and environmental sustainability.
The key criteria and parameters for the European power market in the future are complex. Instead of promoting any single technology solution or innovation, it is most important to have a well-functioning, competitive market that gives producers and consumers access to competitive energy solutions.
The supply and demand balance is very critical on the power market. It is important to realise that there are different values associated with electricity, values like energy, capacity and how different production types contribute to peak capacity. The supplydemand balance requires the ability to respond; obviously, hydropower is excellent for this. For this reason flexible hydro is very attractive for Fortum.
There are many important market developments ongoing in the EU. A market stability reserve (EU MSR) is under discussion and preparation, but it will take some time before it can be implemented. The capacity remuneration mechanism is also under discussion; if and when that mechanism were implemented, it is important that it would be a technology-neutral, cross-border mechanism and that it would include both old and new assets. In addition, the CO2
reduction target for 2030 was accepted as 40 %. This is the framework Fortum is actively working for in Europe, Brussels, and with key decision makers.
Another big issue – in addition to the energy market development and the energy market model – is climate change. Unfortunately, it seems that we are clearly headed towards a global warming of more than 2 degrees Celsius. Some indicators show that we are actually heading towards a three to fourdegree Celsius increase. The situation is hence extremely serious and will be much more so in ten years. We at Fortum have taken environmental issues and sustainability very seriously for several years. We are committed to climate change mitigation and give it a high priority on the company agenda.
Fortum is already in a very strong competitive position – whether measured by CO2-free production, competencies, portfolio, asset flexibility, cost structure, sustainability or safety. We have a solid view on how to develop the company – both in terms of the near future and long-term sustainability – in order to achieve value creation, improving earnings per share growth, and, through that, a continued good platform for stable, sustainable and over time increasing dividends.
Information in the tables and graphs presented for year 2012 or earlier is not restated due to the adoption of IFRS 10 and IFRS 11. Adoption of standards influences treatment of Fortum's holding in AB Fortum Värme samägt med Stockholms stad in the the consolidated financial statements. For further information, see Note 1.6.1. New IFRS standards adopted from 1 Jan 2014.
Earnings per share, EUR
In December, Fortum and Gazprom Energoholding signed a protocol to start a restructuring process of their ownership of TGC-1, a Territorial Generating Company in Russia. TGC-1 owns and operates hydro and thermal power plants in north-western Russia as well as heat distribution networks in St. Petersburg. Currently, Gazprom Energoholding owns 51.8 % of the TGC-1 shares and Fortum 29.5 %.
As part of the restructuring, Fortum will establish a company together with Rosatom to own the hydro assets of TGC-1, while Gazprom Energoholding will continue with the heat and thermal power businesses of TGC-1. By utilising our present stake in TGC-1, Fortum would obtain a more than 75 % ownership in the hydro power company. Rosatom would have a less than 25 % minority holding in the hydro power company. The company would be consolidated to Fortum Group as a subsidiary.
Provided that Fortum obtains a more than 75 % ownership in TGC-1 hydro assets, Fortum would be ready to participate with a minority stake (max. 15 %) in the Finnish Fennovoima nuclear power project on the same terms and conditions as the other Finnish companies currently participating in the project.
The efficiency programme was successfully finished during the fourth quarter of 2014.
Fortum started the efficiency programme in 2012 in order to maintain and strengthen its strategic flexibility and competitiveness and
to enable the company to reach its financial targets in the future.
The aim was to improve the company's cash flow by more than approximately EUR 1 billion during 2013–2014 by reducing capital expenditures (capex) by EUR 250–350
million, divesting approximately EUR 500 million of non-core assets, reducing fixed costs and focusing on working capital efficiency.
The decision to start a strategic assessment of future alternatives for Fortum's electricity distribution business was made in 2013.
In March 2014, Fortum completed the divestment of its Finnish electricity
distribution business. In May, Fortum finalised its sale of the Norwegian electricity distribution business. The sales gains from the both transactions were booked in Fortum's Distribution Segment in the first and second quarter of 2014, respectively.
Fortum is continuing to prepare and evaluate possibilities to divest its distribution business in Sweden.
For further information, see Note 9 Assets held for sale.
In addition, as of 2014, presented figures have been rounded and consequently the sum of individual figures may deviate from
As of 1 January 2014, Fortum has applied the new IFRS 10 Consolidated Financial Statements and 11 Joint Arrangements standards. The major effect of this reassessment relates to Fortum Värme, which is treated as a joint venture and thus consolidated with the equity method.
In 2014, according to preliminary statistics, electricity consumption in the Nordic countries was 378 TWh (2013: 386). Industrial consumption was nearly unchanged, while non-industrial consumption decreased due to the exceptionally warm weather particularly during the first half of the year.
At the beginning of 2014, the Nordic water reservoirs were at 82 TWh, 1 TWh below the long-term average and 3 TWh lower than a year earlier. The year 2014 ended with reservoirs at 80 TWh, 3 TWh below the longterm average and 2 TWh below the level at the end of 2013.
The average area price in Finland was EUR 36.4 per MWh (2013: 39.9) and in Sweden SE3 (Stockholm) EUR 31.3 per MWh (2013: 37.5). The difference in area prices compared to the spot price was mainly due to the fact
Comparative information for 2013 presented in this financial statements has been restated accordingly.
The segment information for 2013 has been restated due to the change in the organisation from 1 March 2014.
that Finland continued exporting power to Estonia, while high Swedish hydropower volumes and good availability of the Swedish nuclear power plants kept Swedish area prices close to the system level.
In 2014, the average system spot price was EUR 29.6 per MWh (2013: 38.1). In Finland, the average area price was EUR 36.0 per MWh (2013: 41.2) and in Sweden SE3 (Stockholm) EUR 31.6 per MWh (2013: 39.4).
In Germany, the average spot price during the fourth quarter of 2014 was EUR 34.8 per MWh (2013: 37.5) and in 2014 EUR 32.8 per MWh (2013: 37.8).
The market price of CO2 emission allowances (EUA) was at approximately EUR 4.8 per tonne at the beginning of the year and approximately EUR 7.3 per tonne by the end of December 2014. In 2014, the EUA daily close ranged between EUR 4.4 and EUR 7.5 per tonne.
the sum presented.
Fortum operates in the Urals and Western Siberia in the Tyumen and Khanty-Mansiysk area, where industrial production is dominated by the oil and gas industries, and in the Chelyabinsk area, which is dominated by the metal industry.
In 2014 according to preliminary statistics, Russia consumed 1,021 TWh (2013: 1,026) of electricity. The corresponding figure in Fortum's operating area in the First price zone (European and Urals part of Russia) was 777 TWh (2013: 772).
In 2014, the average electricity spot price, excluding capacity price, increased by 5 % to RUB 1,163 per MWh (2013: 1,104) in the First price zone.
| TWh | 2014 | 2013 | 2012 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nordic countries | 378 | 386 | 391 |
| Russia | 1,021 | 1,026 | 1,037 |
| Tyumen | 93 | 87 | 83 |
| Chelyabinsk | 36 | 36 | 36 |
| Russia Urals area | 260 | 257 | 252 |
| 2014 | 2013 | 2012 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spot price for power in Nord Pool power exchange, EUR/MWh | 29.6 | 38.1 | 31.2 |
| Spot price for power in Finland, EUR/MWh | 36.0 | 41.2 | 36.6 |
| Spot price for power in Sweden, SE3, Stockholm, EUR/MWh | 31.6 | 39.4 | 32.3 |
| Spot price for power in Sweden, SE2, Sundsvall, EUR/MWh | 31.4 | 39.2 | 31.8 |
| Spot price for power in European and Urals part of Russia, RUB/MWh 1) | 1,163 | 1,104 | 1,001 |
| Average capacity price, tRUB/MW/month | 304 | 276 | 227 |
| Spot price for power in Germany, EUR/MWh | 32.8 | 37.8 | 42.6 |
| Average regulated gas price in Urals region, RUB/1,000 m3 | 3,362 | 3,131 | 2,736 |
| Average capacity price for old capacity, tRUB/MW/month 2) | 167 | 163 | 152 |
| Average capacity price for new capacity, tRUB/MW/month 2) | 552 | 576 | 539 |
| Spot price for power (market price), Urals hub, RUB/MWh 1) | 1,089 | 1,021 | 956 |
| CO2, (ETS EUA), EUR/tonne CO2 | 6 | 5 | 7 |
| Coal (ICE Rotterdam), USD/tonne | 75 | 82 | 93 |
| Oil (Brent Crude), USD/bbl | 99 | 109 | 112 |
1) Excluding capacity tariff.
2) Capacity prices paid only for the capacity available at the time.
| TWh | 31 Dec 2014 | 31 Dec 2013 | 31 Dec 2012 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nordic water reservoirs level | 80 | 82 | 85 |
| Nordic water reservoirs level, long-term average | 83 | 83 | 83 |
| TWh (+ = import to, - = export from Nordic area) | 2014 | 2013 | 2012 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Export/import between Nordic area and Continental Europe+Baltics | -14 | -3 | -19 |
| Export/import between Nordic area and Russia | 4 | 5 | 5 |
| Export/import Nordic area, total | -10 | -2 | -14 |
The European Council agreed in October 2014 on the following energy and climate targets for 2030: at least 40% cut in domestic greenhouse gas emissions, at least 27% share of renewable energy as an EU-level binding target, and at least 27% improvement in energy efficiency as an EU-level indicative target.
An additional target for electricity transmission infrastructure investment was included in the framework. The EU Commission will prepare legislative proposals to implement the agreed 2030 framework during 2015-2016.
Fortum considers the framework as a good foundation, and it should enforce the role of emissions trading as the main instrument for emissions reduction.
The Commission launched a stakeholder consultation on revision of the Emissions Trading Directive in December 2014. A decision on the market stability reserve (MSR) of the EU ETS is expected during the first half of 2015.
The Commission has indicated that it is in the process of developing a reference target model for capacity remuneration mechanisms (CRM). The first preliminary proposals are expected from the Commission during the first half of 2015. Countries choosing to implement CRMs should follow these principles. This would be important in terms of avoiding fragmentation in the internal electricity market.
However, a common EU-wide, competitive and strongly networked internal energy market, where also renewable energy is developed on a market basis, would not just improve competitiveness and mitigate environmental impacts, it would also improve the EU's internal energy availability and security of supply.
In December 2014, the newly nominated EU Commission published its strategic work programme for 2015. The first major initiative will be a Communication on the EU Energy Union in late February 2015. Among other issues, it should explain in more concrete terms how the Commission aims to tackle security of supply challenges.
In order to avoid a new election, the new government alliance reached an agreement with the former government. The "December Agreement" is valid until 2022 and will establish a new praxis enabling minority governments to get state budgets through the Parliament. The agreement also covers cooperation in three areas: energy, pensions and military defence.
In September 2014, the government issued a positive decision-in-principle (DIP) for the Fennovoima nuclear power plant. In the DIP, the government set an important precondition according to which Fennovoima has to have a domestic ownership (i.e. EU/ EEA) of at least 60% at the time of submitting the construction license.
As a consequence of the situation in Ukraine, an amended list of EU restrictive measures against Russia entered into force during the autumn; the gas industry and nuclear energy were not included.
The United Nation's climate conference (COP20) in Lima, Peru, in December, made modest progress in international climate negotiations.
also includes some references to carbon pricing and markets. In order to speed up the deployment of low-carbon solutions, market mechanisms and carbon pricing should be at the core of the future agreement.
| Change | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| EUR million | 2014 | 2013 | 14/13 |
| Power and Technology | 2,156 | 2,252 | -4% |
| Heat, Electricity Sales and Solutions | 1,332 | 1,516 | -12% |
| Russia | 1,055 | 1,119 | -6% |
| Distribution | 751 | 1,064 | -29% |
| Other | 58 | 63 | -8% |
| Netting of Nord Pool transactions 1) | -422 | -478 | -12% |
| Eliminations | -179 | -228 | -21% |
| Total | 4,751 | 5,309 | -11% |
| Change | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| EUR million | 2014 | 2013 | 14/13 |
| Power and Technology | 877 | 859 | 2% |
| Heat, Electricity Sales and Solutions | 104 | 109 | -5% |
| Russia | 161 | 156 | 3% |
| Distribution | 266 | 332 | -20% |
| Other | -57 | -54 | 6% |
| Total | 1,351 | 1,403 | -4% |
| Change | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| EUR million | 2014 | 2013 | 14/13 |
| Power and Technology | 855 | 922 | -7% |
| Heat, Electricity Sales and Solutions | 337 | 134 | 151% |
| Russia | 161 | 156 | 3% |
| Distribution | 2,132 | 349 | 511% |
| Other | -58 | -53 | 9% |
| Total | 3,428 | 1,508 | 127% |
1) Sales and purchases with Nord Pool Spot are netted at the Group level on an hourly basis and posted either as revenue or cost depending on whether Fortum is a net seller or net buyer during any particular hour.
For further information, see Note 5 Segment reporting.
In 2014, Group sales were EUR 4,751 million (2013: 5,309). Comparable operating profit totalled EUR 1,351 million (2013: 1,403), and the reported operating profit totalled EUR 3,428 million (2013: 1,508). Fortum's operating profit for the period was affected by non-recurring items, mainly the divestment of the Finnish electricity distribution business, as well as an IFRS accounting treatment (IAS 39) of derivatives, mainly used for hedging Fortum's power production, and nuclear fund adjustments amounting to EUR 2,077 million (2013: 106).
The share of profit from associates in 2014 was EUR 149 million (2013: 178), of which Fortum Värme represents EUR 67 million (2013: 73). The share of profit from Hafslund and TGC-1 are based on the companies' published third-quarter 2014 interim reports.
The Group's net financial expenses were EUR 217 million (2013: 289). Net financial expenses include changes in the fair value of financial instruments of EUR -5 million (2013: -16).
Profit before taxes was EUR 3,360 million (2013: 1,398).
Taxes for the period totalled EUR 199 million (2013: 186). The tax rate according to the income statement was 5.9% (2013: 13.3%). In Finland, the corporate tax rate was decreased from 24.5% to 20.0% starting 1 January 2014; the decrease impacted approximately EUR 0.09 per share the fourth quarter of 2013. In 2014, the tax rate, excluding the impact of the share of profit from associated companies and joint ventures as well as non-taxable capital gains, was 18.8% (2013: 22.7%).
The profit for the period was EUR 3,161 million (2013. 1,212). Fortum's earnings per
share were EUR 3.55 (2013: 1.36), of which EUR 2.36 (2013: 0.10) per share relates to items affecting comparability. The earnings per share impact from the divestment of the Finnish electricity distribution business was EUR 2.08 per share.
Profit before taxes, EUR million
| Change | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| EUR million | 2014 | 2013 | 14/13 |
| Interest expense | -256 | -301 | -15% |
| Interest income | 84 | 75 | 12% |
| Fair value gains and losses | -5 | -16 | -69% |
| Other financial expenses | -40 | -47 | -15% |
| Finance costs - net | -217 | -289 | -25% |
| Interest-bearing liabilities 1) | 6,983 | 9,058 | -23% |
| Less: Liquid funds 2) | 2,766 | 1,265 | 119% |
| Interest-bearing net debt | 4,217 | 7,793 | -46% |
| Interest-bearing net debt without Värme financing | 3,664 | 6,658 | -45% |
1) 2013 includes EUR 20 million presented as asset held for sale.
2) 2013 includes EUR 15 million presented as asset held for sale.
In 2014, total net cash from operating activities increased by EUR 214 million to EUR 1,762 million (2013: 1,548), mainly due to the EUR 300 million positive impact of realised foreign exchange differences, which were offset by changes in working capital EUR -125 million. Realised foreign exchange gains and losses of EUR 352 million (2013: 52) were related to the rollover of foreign exchange contract hedging loans to Fortum's Swedish and Russian subsidiaries. Capital expenditures decreased by EUR 236 million to EUR 768 million (2013: 1,004). Proceeds from divestments of shares totalled EUR 3,062 million (2013: 122), mainly from the divestment of the Finnish distribution business and Gasum shares (Note 8). Proceeds from interest-bearing receivables included EUR 534 million paid by Fortum Värme. Total net cash used in investing activities was positive EUR 2,816 million (2013: -944). Cash flow before financing activities, i.e. financing, increased by EUR 3,974 million to EUR 4,578 million (2013: 604).
The proceeds were partially used to pay dividends totalling EUR 977 million in April 2014 as well as payments of interest-bearing debt amounting to EUR 2,079 million. Liquid funds at year-end 2014 were EUR 2,766 million (2013: 1,265).
Total assets decreased by EUR 1,973 million to EUR 21,375 million (2013: 23,348), which includes the decrease of non-current assets, EUR 2,412 million. Translation differences decreased intangible assets, property, plant and equipment as well as participation in
associates and joint ventures by EUR 2,015 million and divestments by EUR 433 million.
Assets of the Finnish distribution business, amounting to EUR 1,173 million, were presented as Assets held for sale at the end of 2013. Liquid funds increased by EUR 1,501 million.
Capital employed was EUR 17,918 million (2013: 19,183), a decrease of EUR 1,265 million.
For further information, see Note 9 Assets held for sale.
Total equity was EUR 10,935 million (2013: 10,124), of which equity attributable to owners of the parent company totalled EUR 10,864 million (2013: 10,024). The increase in equity attributable to owners of the parent company totalled EUR 840 million and was mainly from the net profit of EUR 3,154 million for the period, offset by translation differences of EUR -1,320 million and paid dividends of EUR 977 million.
Net debt decreased during 2014 by EUR 3,576 million to EUR 4,217 million (2013: 7,793). Net debt without Värme financing was EUR 3,664 million (2013: 6,658).
At the end of December 2014, the Group's liquid funds totalled EUR 2,766 million (2013: 1,265). Liquid funds include cash and bank deposits held by OAO Fortum amounting to EUR 134 million (2013: 113). In addition to the liquid funds, Fortum had access to approximately EUR 2.2 billion of undrawn committed credit facilities.
The Group's net financial expenses in 2014 were EUR 217 million (2013: 289). Net financial expenses include changes in the fair value of financial instruments of EUR -5 million (2013: -16).
Fortum Corporation's long-term credit rating with both S&P and Fitch remained unchanged during 2014 and is A- (negative outlook).
At year-end 2014, net debt to EBITDA was 1.1 (3.7 at year-end 2013) and comparable net debt to EBITDA 2.3 (2013: 3.9). Fortum is currently financing Fortum Värme, and these loans, EUR 553 million (2013: 1,135), are presented as interest-bearing loan receivables in Fortum's balance sheet.
However, the aim is to refinance the loans during 2015. If these loans are deducted from the net debt, the last-twelve-months comparable net debt to EBITDA is 2.0 (2013: 3.4).
Gearing was 39% (2013: 77%) and the equityto-assets ratio 51% (2013: 43%). Equity per
share was EUR 12.23 (2013: 11.28). Return on capital employed totalled 19.5% (2013: 9.0%) and return on shareholders' equity 30.0% (2013: 12.0%). Both return on capital employed and return on equity were positively affected by the capital gain from the divestment of the Finnish electricity distribution business as well as the
divestment of the Norwegian electricity distribution and heat businesses.
Power and Technology consists of Fortum's hydro, nuclear and thermal power generation, Power Solutions with expert services, portfolio management and trading, as well as technology and R&D functions. The segment incorporates two divisions: the Hydro Power and Technology Division and the Nuclear and Thermal Power Division.
| Change | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| EUR million | 2014 | 2013 | 14/13 |
| Sales | 2,156 | 2,252 | -4% |
| - power sales | 2,026 | 2,117 | -4% |
| - other sales | 130 | 135 | -4% |
| Operating profit | 855 | 922 | -7% |
| Comparable operating profit | 877 | 859 | 2% |
| Comparable EBITDA | 998 | 1,007 | -1% |
| Net assets (at period-end) | 6,001 | 6,355 | -6% |
| Return on net assets, % | 13.6 | 14.5 | -6% |
| Comparable return on net assets, % | 14.2 | 13.8 | 3% |
| Capital expenditure and gross investments in shares | 198 | 181 | 9% |
| Number of employees | 1,639 | 1,723 | -5% |
In 2014, Power and Technology's comparable operating profit was EUR 877 million (2013: 859), i.e. EUR 18 million higher than in 2013. This was mainly due to the higher hydropower production volumes, lower operating costs and SEK development, which offset the negative impact from the lower achieved price as well as lower thermal volumes and
Grangemouth divestment. In addition, an impairment loss totalling EUR 20 million in 2013 was booked due to the decision to discontinue electricity production at Fortum's Inkoo coal-fired power plant in Finland.
Operating profit, EUR 855 million (2013: 922), was affected by sales gains totalling EUR 52 million (2013: 25) and by the IFRS accounting treatment (IAS 39) of derivatives, mainly used for hedging Fortum's power production, and by nuclear fund adjustments amounting to EUR -73 million (2013: 38).
| Change | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| TWh | 2014 | 2013 | 14/13 |
| Hydro and wind power | 22.4 | 18.1 | 24% |
| Nuclear power | 23.8 | 23.7 | 0% |
| Thermal power | 0.9 | 1.9 | -53% |
| Total in the Nordic countries | 47.1 | 43.7 | 8% |
| Thermal in other countries | 0.7 | 1.0 | -30% |
| Total | 47.9 | 44.7 | 7% |
| Change | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| TWh | 2014 | 2013 | 14/13 |
| Nordic sales volume | 48.6 | 45.3 | 7% |
| of which Nordic Power sales volume 1) | 44.6 | 40.2 | 11% |
1) The Nordic power sales income and volume does not include thermal generation, market price-related purchases or sales to minorities (i.e. Meri-Pori, Inkoo and imports from Russia).
| EUR/MWh | 2014 | 2013 | Change 14/13 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Power and Technology's Nordic power price 2) | 41.4 | 46.4 | -11% |
2) Power and Technology's Nordic power price does not include sales income from thermal generation, market price-related purchases or sales to minorities (i.e. Meri-Pori, Inkoo and imports from Russia).
Power and Technology's achieved Nordic power price was EUR 41.4 per MWh (2013: 46.4), or EUR 5.0 per MWh lower than in 2013. The system and all area prices were clearly lower during 2014 compared to 2013. The average system spot price of electricity in Nord Pool was EUR 29.6 per MWh (2013: 38.1). The average area price in Finland was EUR 36.0 per MWh (2013: 41.2) and in Sweden SE3 (Stockholm) EUR 31.6 per MWh (2013: 39.4).
The segment's total power generation in the Nordic countries was 47.1 TWh (2013: 43.7). Due to normalised hydro inflow and reservoir levels, hydropower production was 4.3 TWh higher in 2014 compared to 2013. Nuclear volumes were 0.2 TWh higher due to improved availability. Overall nuclear availability was at a high level in Fortum's fully owned and co-owned reactors, except in Oskarshamn 2. Availability in Forsmark and Olkiluoto nuclear plants were at all time high in 2014. Oskarshamn 2 has been shut down since 1 June 2013 for an extensive safety modernisation.
Thermal production was 0.9 TWh (2013: 1.9) in the Nordic countries. The CO2-free production amounted to 97% (2013: 94%).
generation
Heat, Electricity Sales and Solutions consists of combined heat and power (CHP) production as well as heat and electricity sales and development of customer-oriented solutions. The business operations are located in the Nordics, the Baltic countries, Poland and India. The segment also includes Fortum's 50% holding in Fortum Värme, which is a joint venture and is accounted for using the equity method.
| Change | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| EUR million | 2014 | 2013 | 14/13 |
| Sales | 1,332 | 1,516 | -12% |
| - heat sales | 430 | 492 | -13% |
| - power sales | 783 | 900 | -13% |
| - other sales | 119 | 124 | -4% |
| Operating profit | 337 | 134 | 151% |
| Comparable operating profit | 104 | 109 | -5% |
| of which Electricity Sales | 48 | 47 | 2% |
| Comparable EBITDA | 204 | 211 | -3% |
| Net assets (at period-end) | 2,112 | 2,295 | -8% |
| Return on net assets, % | 19.1 | 9.7 | 97% |
| Comparable return on net assets, % | 8.7 | 8.7 | 0% |
| Capital expenditure and gross investments in shares | 124 | 134 | -7% |
| Number of employees | 1,807 | 1,968 | -8% |
As of 2014, the former Heat Division and Electricity Sales and Solutions business area are reported as one segment. In addition, Fortum Värme, which earlier was consolidated as a subsidiary under the Heat Division, is treated as a joint venture and thus consolidated with the equity method. The effect of Fortum Värme is hence included in the share of profits in associates and joint ventures. In January-December 2014, this represented EUR 67 (73) million.
In 2014, heat sales volumes of Heat, Electricity Sales and Solutions amounted to 7.9 TWh (2013: 10.7). Power sales volumes from CHP production totalled 2.8 TWh (2013: 3.5). Despite the new capacity and lower fuel costs, heat and power sales volumes were lower, mainly due to the warmer weather during the first and third quarter of 2014 and to the divestments made in 2013 and 2014. The warm weather also burdened retail sales, especially during the first quarter of 2014.
Comparable operating profit was EUR 104 million (2013: 109). The result decreased, mainly due to the lower volumes and lower power prices, despite new capacity and lower fuel costs.
Operating profit totalled EUR 337 million (2013: 134) and was affected by sales gains totalling EUR 254 million (2013: 18).
At the end of December 2014, Fortum's customer base in Electricity Sales exceeded 1.3 million.
| Change | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| TWh | 2014 | 2013 | 14/13 |
| Finland | 3.2 | 5.4 | -41% |
| Poland | 3.4 | 4.1 | -15% |
| Other countries | 1.3 | 1.2 | 8% |
| Total | 7.9 | 10.7 | -26% |
| Change | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| TWh | 2014 | 2013 | 14/13 |
| CHP | 2.8 | 3.5 | -20% |
| Electricity Sales | 13.8 | 13.6 | 1% |
| Total | 16.5 | 17.1 | -4% |
The Russia segment consists of power and heat generation and sales in Russia. The segment also includes Fortum's over 29% holding in TGC-1, which is an associated company and is accounted for using the equity method.
| Change | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| EUR million | 2014 | 2013 | 14/13 |
| Sales | 1,055 | 1,119 | -6% |
| - power sales | 758 | 822 | -8% |
| - heat sales | 285 | 290 | -2% |
| - other sales | 11 | 7 | 57% |
| Operating profit | 161 | 156 | 3% |
| Comparable operating profit | 161 | 156 | 3% |
| Comparable EBITDA | 304 | 258 | 18% |
| Net assets (at period-end) | 2,597 | 3,846 | -32% |
| Return on net assets, % | 5.6 | 5.2 | 8% |
| Comparable return on net assets, % | 5.6 | 5.2 | 8% |
| Capital expenditure and gross investments in shares | 367 | 435 | -16% |
| Number of employees | 4,213 | 4,162 | 1% |
The liberalisation of the Russian wholesale power market has been completed since the beginning of 2011. However, all generating companies continue to sell a part of their electricity and capacity – an amount equalling the consumption of households and a few special groups of consumers – under regulated prices. During 2014, Fortum sold approximately 80% of its power production in Russia at a liberalised electricity price.
The capacity selection for generation built prior to 2008 (CCS – "old capacity") for 2014 was held in September 2013. All of Fortum's capacity was allowed to participate in the selection for 2014, and the majority of Fortum's power plants were also selected. The volume of Fortum's installed capacity not selected in the auction totalled 132 MW, which represents 4.6% of Fortum's total old capacity in Russia.
The generation capacity built after 2007 under the Russian Government's capacity supply agreements (CSA – "new capacity") receives guaranteed payments for a period of 10 years. The period and the prices for capacity under CSA were defined to ensure a sufficient return on investments. At the time of the acquisition in 2008, Fortum made a provision, as penalty clauses are included in
the CSA agreement in case of possible delays. If the new capacity is delayed or if the agreed major terms of the capacity supply agreement are not otherwise fulfilled, possible penalties can be claimed. The effect of changes in the timing of commissioning of new units is assessed at each balance sheet date and the provision is changed accordingly.
Received capacity payments differ depending on the age, location, type and size of the plant as well as seasonality and availability. The CSA payments can also vary somewhat annually because they are linked to the Russian Government long-term bonds with 8 to 10 years maturity. In addition, the regulator will review the guaranteed CSA payments by re-examining earnings from the electricity-only market three and six years after the commissioning of a unit and could revise the CSA payments accordingly.
In 2014, the Russia Segment's power sales volumes amounted to 26.5 TWh (2013: 25.6). Heat sales totalled 26.0 TWh (2013: 24.1) during the same period.
The Russia Segment's comparable operating profit was EUR 161 million (2013: 156). The positive effect from the new units receiving CSA payments amounted to approximately
EUR 165 million (2013: 163), including EUR -35 million due to the weaker rouble, a reversal of the CSA provisions totalling EUR 4 million (2013: 48). In addition, better electricity and heat spreads, income from heat connections, improved bad-debt collections and increased efficiency positively affected the result. Overall, the weakened Russian rouble affected the result negatively by approximately EUR 34 million. Note for comparison that 2013 figures included a reversal of the CSA provision totalling EUR 48 million and EUR 40 million in compensation for CSA penalties.
Operating profit was EUR 161 million (2013: 156).
In late September, the third unit at Fortum's Nyagan Power Plant passed the comprehensive and certification tests that precede commissioning. Fortum started the commercial operation of the unit at the end of 2014. Capacity payments under the Russian Government's capacity supply agreement for 418 megawatts (MW) started as of 1 January 2015.
| 2014 | 2013 | Change 14/13 |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Electricity spot price (market price), Urals hub, RUB/MWh | 1,089 | 1,021 | 7% |
| Average regulated gas price, Urals region, RUB/1,000 m3 | 3,362 | 3,131 | 7% |
| Average capacity price for CCS "old capacity", tRUB/MW/month 1) | 167 | 163 | 2% |
| Average capacity price for CSA "new capacity", tRUB/MW/month 1) | 552 | 576 | -4% |
| Average capacity price, tRUB/MW/month | 304 | 276 | 10% |
| Achieved power price for OAO Fortum, EUR/MWh | 30.4 | 32.1 | -5% |
1) Capacity prices paid for the capacity volumes excluding unplanned outages, repairs and own consumption.
Fortum owns and operates electricity distribution and regional networks, and distributes electricity to a total of 0.9 million customers in Sweden.
| Change | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| EUR million | 2014 | 2013 | 14/13 |
| Sales | 751 | 1,064 | -29% |
| - distribution network transmission | 590 | 896 | -34% |
| - regional network transmission | 120 | 129 | -7% |
| - other sales | 41 | 39 | 5% |
| Operating profit | 2,132 | 349 | 511% |
| Comparable operating profit | 266 | 332 | -20% |
| Comparable EBITDA | 416 | 548 | -24% |
| Net assets (at period-end) | 2,615 | 3,745 | -30% |
| Return on net assets, % | 73.6 | 9.3 | 691% |
| Comparable return on net assets, % | 9.3 | 8.8 | 6% |
| Capital expenditure and gross investments in shares | 147 | 255 | -42% |
| Number of employees | 390 | 805 | -52% |
In 2014, the volume of distribution and regional network transmissions totalled 17.6 TWh (2013: 26.1) and 13.8 TWh (2013: 16.3), respectively. Volumes were lower due to warmer weather, especially during the first quarter of 2014. The lower total volume was mainly due to the divestment of the Finnish and Norwegian distribution businesses.
The Distribution Segment's comparable operating profit was EUR 266 million (2013: 332). The decrease was mainly due to the very mild weather during the first quarter and to the divestment of the electricity distribution business in Finland that was finalised at the end of March.
Operating profit totalled EUR 2,132 million (2013: 349) and was affected by sales gains totalling approximately EUR 1,865 billion from the Finnish and Norwegian electricity distribution businesses.
| Change | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| TWh | 2014 | 2013 | 14/13 |
| Sweden | 13.7 | 14.1 | -3% |
| Finland | 2.8 | 9.5 | -71% |
| Norway | 1.1 | 2.5 | -56% |
| Total | 17.6 | 26.1 | -33% |
| Thousands | Dec 31 2014 | Dec 31 2013 | Change 14/13 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sweden | 906 | 903 | 0% |
| Finland | - | 642 | - |
| Norway | - | 103 | - |
| Total | 906 | 1,648 | -45% |
0
| EUR million | 2014 | 2013 |
|---|---|---|
| Capital expenditure | ||
| Intangible assets | 22 | 46 |
| Property, plant and equipment | 752 | 959 |
| Total | 774 | 1,005 |
| Gross investments in shares | ||
| Subsidiaries | 7 | 11 |
| Associated companies | 60 | 0 |
| Available for sale financial assets | 2 | 4 |
| Total | 69 | 15 |
In 2014, capital expenditures and investments in shares totalled EUR 843 million (2013: 1,020). Investments, excluding acquisitions, were EUR 774 million (2013: 1,005).
See also Note 19.2 Capital expenditure.
Fortum expects to start the supply of power and heat from new power plants and to upgrade existing plants as follows:
| Type | Electricity capacity MW |
Heat capacity MW |
Supply starts | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power and Technology | ||||
| Hydro refurbishment | Hydropower | 14 | 2015 | |
| Russia 1) | ||||
| Chelyabinsk 1 | Gas (CCGT) | 248 | 175 | 1H 2015 |
| Chelyabinsk 2 | Gas (CCGT) | 248 | 175 | 1H 2015 |
1) Start of commercial operation.
Through its interest in Teollisuuden Voima Oyj (TVO), Fortum is participating in the building of Olkiluoto 3 (OL3), a 1,600-MW nuclear power plant unit in Finland. The start of commercial electricity production of the plant is expected to take place in late 2018, according to the plant supplier AREVA-Siemens Consortium. TVO has withdrawn a EUR 200 million shareholder loan from the total EUR 600 million commitment. Fortum's share of the EUR 200 million withdrawals is
approximately EUR 50 million. Fortum's remaining commitment for OL3 is EUR 100 million.
In March 2014, Fortum started an extensive refurbishment of two of the Imatra hydropower plant's seven units. The refurbishment will increase the capacity of the power plant by 14 MW to 192 MW and will improve safety and reliability. After the refurbishment, the Imatra plant will be Finland's largest hydropower plant in terms of capacity and production.
In May 2014, Fortum and the Areva-Siemens Consortium agreed on the discontinuation of the current automation modernisation project agreement at the Loviisa nuclear power plant in Finland. The Areva-Siemens Consortium will complete the ongoing agreed and resized work in cooperation with Fortum. Furthermore, Fortum signed an agreement with Rolls-Royce for the continued modernisation of the power plant's automation. The modernisation will be carried out over several years.
In September, the Finnish Government rejected TVO's application to extend the period of validity of the existing decision-inprinciple of the Olkiluoto 4 nuclear power plant. The decision-in-principle is still in force, and the deadline for submitting the construction license application is 30 June 2015.
In October, Fortum sold its UK-based subsidiary Grangemouth CHP Limited to INEOS Industries Holdings Ltd. Grangemouth CHP Limited owns and operates a natural gas-fired CHP plant located at Grangemouth in Scotland.
In December 2014, Fortum announced that provided that the company would obtain a more than 75% ownership in Russian TGC-1 hydro assets, it would be ready to participate with a minority stake (max 15%) in the Finnish Fennovoima nuclear power project on the
same terms and conditions as the other Finnish companies currently participating in the project.
Through Fortum's interests in Fortum Värme, Fortum's joint venture with the City of Stockholm, the company is investing in a new biofuelled combined heat and power (CHP) plant in Värtan, Stockholm. The new CHP plant will replace some existing heat production and is planned to be commissioned in 2016. The new plant will have a production capacity of 280 MW heat and 130 MW electricity.
In addition, Fortum is participating in its joint venture Turun Seudun Energiantuotanto Oy's (TSE) new CHP plant in Naantali, Finland, which will replace the old existing plant. The plan is to commission the new power plant in 2017. The plant's production capacity will be 244 MW heat and 142 MW electricity.
In June 2014, Fortum completed the divestment of its Norwegian heat business to the iCON Infrastructure Partners II, L.P. fund.
In September 2014, Fortum finalized the acquisitions of E.ON Ruhrgas International GmbH's shareholding of 33.66% in the Estonian natural gas import, sales and distribution company AS Eesti Gaas and a similar shareholding in the gas transmission service company AS Võrguteenus Valdus. The acquired shares increased Fortum's holding in both companies to approximately 51%. Fortum continues to account for its holdings in the Estonian natural gas businesses using the equity method.
In November, Fortum agreed to sell its 51.4% shareholding in the associated company AS Võrguteenus Valdus. Fortum finalised the transaction in early January of 2015. The sale is expected to have a minor impact on Fortum's result.
In addition, in November, Fortum announced the divestment of its shareholding in the Finnish natural gas company Gasum Oy to the Finnish State. The sales price for the total amount of Fortum's shares was approximately EUR 310 million. Fortum booked a gain of roughly EUR 190 million in the fourth quarter 2014 results of Fortum's Heat, Electricity Sales and Solutions segment.
In December 2014, Fortum and Gazprom Energoholding signed a protocol to start a restructuring process of their ownership of TGC-1, a Territorial Generating Company in Russia. TGC-1 owns and operates hydro and
thermal power plants in north-western Russia as well as heat distribution networks in St. Petersburg. Currently Gazprom Energoholding owns 51.8% of the TGC-1 shares and Fortum 29.5%.
As part of the restructuring, Fortum will establish a company together with Rosatom to own the hydro assets of TGC-1, while Gazprom Energoholding continues with the heat and thermal power businesses of TGC-1. By utilising its present stake in TGC-1, Fortum would obtain a more than 75% ownership in the hydro power company. Rosatom would have a less than 25% minority holding in the hydropower company.
In March 2014, Fortum completed the divestment of its Finnish electricity distribution business to Suomi Power Networks Oy. The total consideration was EUR 2.55 billion on a debt- and cash-free basis. Fortum's one-time sales gain of approximately EUR 1.85 billion corresponds to EUR 2.08 per share. The sales gain is booked in Fortum's Distribution Segment in the first quarter of 2014.
In May 2014, Fortum completed the divestment of its Norwegian electricity distribution business to the Hafslund Group.
| 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|
| Number of employees, 31 Dec | 8,592 | 9,186 |
| Average number of employees | 8,821 | 9,532 |
| Total amount of employee costs, EUR million | 413 | 460 |
Fortum's operations are mainly based in the Nordic countries, Russia, Poland and the Baltic Rim area. The total number of employees at the end of December was 8,592 (9,186 at the end of 2013).
At the end of December 2014, Power and Technology had 1,639 (2013: 1,723) employees; Heat, Electricity Sales and Solutions 1,807 (2013: 1,968); Russia 4,213 (2013: 4,162); Distribution 390 (2013: 805); and Other 543 (2013: 528).
Headcount reductions were mainly due to the divestment of the Finnish and Norwegian distribution businesses and Fortum's efficiency programme. Reductions related to the efficiency programme have been implemented on a unit level by using natural rotation, rearrangement of vacancies and by retirement. Vacant jobs have primarily been filled internally. The possibilities for internal rotation have been improved.
By rotating staff between different countries and divisions, the company improves knowhow and develops the exchange of competencies throughout the organisation.
For further details of Group personnel see Note 12 Employee benefits.
Number of employees, 31 Dec.
Fortum renewed its business structure as of 1 March 2014. The target of the reorganisation is to strengthen Fortum's capability to execute the company's strategy in the fast-developing operating environment. Matti Ruotsala was appointed Chief Operating Officer (COO) and Timo Karttinen Chief Financial Officer (CFO). New Executive Management Team members are Tiina Tuomela, who was appointed Executive Vice President (EVP), Nuclear and Thermal Power; Kari Kautinen, Senior Vice President (SVP), Strategy,
Mergers and Acquisitions; and Esa Hyvärinen, Senior Vice President, Corporate Relations.
In the new structure, Fortum has four reporting segments:
Fortum's six staff functions are:
COO Matti Ruotsala, CFO Timo Karttinen and Alexander Chuvaev, EVP of Russia, as well as the heads of the staff functions report to President and CEO.
The company's General Counsel and Executive Team member Kaarina Ståhlberg left her position as General Counsel and member of Fortum's Executive Management as of 8 April 2014, due to family reasons.
In June 2014, Sirpa-Helena Sormunen, LL.M., 54, was appointed General Counsel and member of Fortum Corporation's Executive Management as of 1 September 2014. She reports to the President and CEO.
On 22 January 2015, it was announced that Tapio Kuula, President and CEO of Fortum Corporation, will go on a disability pension starting 1 February 2015. Tapio Kuula has been the President and CEO of Fortum Corporation since 2009. Fortum's Board has started the search process for a new CEO covering internal and external candidates. In the meanwhile, Timo Karttinen, CFO of
Fortum's financial results are exposed to a number of economic, strategic, political, financial and operational risks. One of the key factors influencing Fortum's business performance is the wholesale price of electricity in the Nordic region. The key drivers behind the wholesale price development in the Nordic region are the supply-demand balance, fuel and CO2 emissions allowance prices as well as the hydrological situation. The completion of Fortum's investment programme in Russia is also one key driver to the company's result growth, due to the increase in production volumes and CSA payments.
The continued global economic uncertainty and Europe's sovereign-debt crisis has kept the outlook for economic growth unpredictable. The overall economic uncertainty impacts commodity and CO2 emissions allowance prices, and this could maintain downward pressure on the Nordic wholesale price for electricity. In Fortum's Russian business, the key factors are economic growth, the rouble exchange rate, the regulation around the heat business, and further development of electricity and capacity markets. Operational risks related to Fortum will also act as interim President and CEO.
On 22 January, Fortum's Nomination Board proposed to the Annual General Meeting that the Board consists of eight (8) members and that the following persons be elected to the Board of Directors for a term ending at the end of the Annual General Meeting 2016. To be re-elected: Ms Sari Baldauf as Chairman,
the investment projects in the current investment programme are still valid. In all regions, fuel prices and power plant availability also impact profitability. In addition, increased volatility in exchange rates due to financial turbulence could have both translation and transaction effects on Fortum's financials, especially through the and the Russian rouble (RUB) and Swedish krona (SEK). In the Nordic countries, also the regulatory and fiscal environment for the energy sector has added risks for utility companies.
For further details on Fortum's risks and risk management, see the Risk management section of the Operating and financial review and Note 3 Financial risk management.
Despite macroeconomic uncertainty, electricity is expected to continue to gain a higher share of the total energy consumption. Fortum continues to expect the annual growth rate in electricity consumption to be on average approximately 0.5%, while the growth rate for the nearest years will largely be determined by macroeconomic development in Europe and especially in the Nordic countries.
Mr Kim Ignatius as Deputy Chairman, and as members; Ms Minoo Akhtarzand, Mr Heinz-Werner Binzel, Mr Petteri Taalas and Mr Jyrki Talvitie. To be elected as new board members; Ms Eva Hamilton and Mr Tapio Kuula.
During 2014, the price of European Union emissions allowances (EUA) appreciated, whereas the oil and coal prices declined. The price of electricity for the upcoming twelve months declined in the Nordic area as well as in Germany.
In late January 2015, the future quotation for coal (ICE Rotterdam) for the rest of 2015 was around USD 58 per tonne, and the price for CO2 emission allowances for 2015 was about EUR 7 per tonne. The electricity forward price in Nord Pool for the rest of 2015 was around EUR 28 per MWh and for 2016 around EUR 29 per MWh. In Germany, the electricity forward price for the rest of 2015 was around EUR 32 per MWh and for 2016 around EUR 32 per MWh. Nordic water reservoirs were about 1 TWh below the long-term average and 1 TWh below the corresponding level of 2014.
In December, Fortum and Gazprom Energoholding signed a protocol to start a restructuring process of their ownership of TGC-1, a Territorial Generating Company in Russia. TGC-1 owns and operates hydro and thermal power plants in north-western Russia
as well as heat distribution networks in St. Petersburg. Currently, Gazprom Energoholding owns 51.8% of the TGC-1 shares and Fortum 29.5%.
As part of the restructuring, Fortum will establish a company together with Rosatom to own the hydro assets of TGC-1, while Gazprom Energoholding continues with the heat and thermal power businesses of TGC-1. By utilising its present stake in TGC-1, Fortum would obtain a more than 75% ownership in the hydro power company. Rosatom would have a less than 25% minority holding in the hydro power company. The company would be consolidated to Fortum Group as a subsidiary.
Provided that Fortum obtains a more than 75% ownership in TGC-1 hydro assets, Fortum would be ready to participate with a minority stake (max. 15%) in the Finnish Fennovoima nuclear power project on the same terms and conditions as the other Finnish companies currently participating in the project.
The Power and Technology Segments Nordic power price typically depends on factors such as hedge ratios, hedge prices, spot prices, availability and utilisation of Fortum's flexible production portfolio, and currency fluctuations. Excluding the potential effects from changes in the power generation mix, a 1 EUR/MWh change in the Power and Technology Segment's Nordic power sales (achieved) price will result in an approximately EUR 45 million change in Fortum's annual comparable operating profit. In addition, the comparable operating profit of the Power and Technology Segment will be affected by the possible thermal power generation volumes and its profits.
The ongoing, multi-year Swedish nuclear investment programmes are expected to enhance safety, improve long term availability and increase the capacity of the current nuclear fleet. The implementation of the investment programmes could, however, affect availability. Fortum's power procurement costs from co-owned nuclear companies are affected by these investment programmes through increased depreciation and finance costs of associated companies.
As a result of the nuclear stress tests in the EU, the Swedish nuclear safety authority (SSM) has decided to propose new regulations for Swedish nuclear reactors. The process is ongoing. Fortum emphasises that maintaining a high level of nuclear safety is
the highest priority, but considers EU-level harmonisation of nuclear safety requirements to be of utmost importance.
In 2014, the Swedish Government decided to increase the nuclear waste fund fee from approximately 0.022 to approximately 0.04 SEK/kWh for the period 2015 to 2017. The estimated impact on Fortum would be approximately EUR 25 million annually. The process to review the Swedish nuclear waste fees is done in a three-year cycle.
The previously announced Swedish Government state budget proposal to increase the tax on the installed effect in nuclear power plants by 17 % iscurrently on hold.
The generation capacity built after 2007 under the Russian Government's capacity supply agreements (CSA – "new capacity") receives guaranteed capacity payments for a period of 10 years. Prices for capacity under CSA are defined in order to ensure a sufficient return on investments. The issue of prolonged CSA payments from 10 to 15 years has been under discussion in the Russian Government; however, no official decisions have yet been made.
The capacity selection for generation built prior to 2008 (CCS – "old capacity") for 2015 was held in September 2014. All of Fortum's capacity was allowed to participate in the selection for 2015, and the majority of Fortum's plants were also selected. The volume of Fortum's installed capacity not selected in the auction totalled 195 MW (approximately 3.7% of Fortum's total old capacity in Russia) for which Fortum plans to obtain forced mode status.
The Russia Segment's new capacity will be a key driver for earnings growth in Russia, as it is expected to bring income from new volumes sold and to also receive considerably higher capacity payments than the old capacity. The received capacity payment will differ depending on the age, location, size and type of the plants as well as on seasonality and availability. The return on the new capacity is guaranteed, as regulated in the CSA. CSA payments can vary somewhat annually because they are linked to Russian Government long-term bonds with 8 to 10 years maturity. In addition, the regulator will review the earnings from the electricity-only market three years and six years after the commissioning of a unit and could revise the CSA payments accordingly.
The value of the remaining part of the investment programme, calculated at the exchange rates prevailing at the end of December 2014, is estimated to be approximately EUR 0.2 billion, as of December 2014.
The Russian result is impacted by seasonal volatility caused by the nature of the heat business, with the first and last quarter being clearly the strongest.
At the time of the acquisition of the Russian subsidiary OAO Fortum in 2008, the EUR 500 million run-rate level in operating profit (EBIT) target set to be reached during 2015 in the Russia Segment corresponded to approximately RUB 18.2 billion at the then prevailing euro-rouble exchange rates. As earlier communicated, the segment's profits are mainly impacted by changes in currency exchange rates as well as power demand, gas prices and other regulatory development. Fortum is keeping its rouble-denominated target intact, but, mainly due to the translation effect, the euro-denominated result level will be volatile. The income statements of non-euro subsidiaries are translated into the Group reporting currency using the average exchange rates. Currently, the unfavourable exchange balance converts into a lower profit level in euros. However, every effort to mitigate the negative impacts is continuously being made.
In 2014, the Ministry of Energy proposed a new heat market model (for public discussion), which is supposed to ensure a transition to economically justified heat tariffs by 2020 and attract investments into the heat sector. In September 2014, the heat market reform roadmap was approved by the Russian Government; according to the roadmap, the reform shall give heat market liberalisation by 2020 or, in some specific areas, by 2023.
As forecasted by the Russian Ministry of Economic Development, Russian gas price indexation did not take place in October 2014. However, year-on-year gas price growth is estimated to be 3.5% in 2015.
Fortum continues to prepare and evaluate for a possible sale of the Swedish electricity distribution business.
In Sweden, legal processes are under way concerning the appeal filed regarding the network income regulatory period 2012-2015. The Administrative Court in Sweden ruled in favour of the network
companies in November 2013. The Energy Market Inspectorate decided to appeal the decision to the next final-law court, the Supreme Administrative Court, which still needs to decide on granting a leave to appeal.
The work to define the Swedish network income regulation model for the next regulatory period 2016-2019 is ongoing. In September 2014, the Swedish Government made a decision regarding the capital base ordinance; however, the details will be decided by the Energy Market Inspectorate. Decisions are expected to be made during the spring 2015.
Fortum currently expects its capital expenditure in 2015 to be approximately EUR 0.9 billion, excluding potential acquisitions (including Distribution segment). The annual maintenance capital expenditure (excluding Distribution segment) is estimated to be about EUR 300-350 million in 2015, below the level of depreciation.
Fortum will gradually decrease its financing to Fortum Värme, the co-owned power and heat company operating in the capital area in Sweden, during 2014-2015. At the end of December 2014, Fortum Värme's remaining interest-bearing liability to Fortum is approximately EUR 0.6 billion.
The effective corporate income tax rate for Fortum in 2015 is estimated to be 19–21%, excluding the impact of the share of profits of associated companies and joint ventures, non-taxable capital gains and non-recurring items.
The Finnish Government decided in June 2014 that it will not, after all, introduce a power plant tax (windfall tax) on nuclear, hydro and wind power built before 2004. The final decision to revoke the tax was made by the Parliament in November 2014, and the revocation entered into force on 1 January 2015.
In August, the Finnish Board of Adjustment of the Large Taxpayers' Office had unanimously approved Fortum Corporation's appeal of the income tax assessment imposed on Fortum for the year 2007 in December 2013. The Tax Recipients' Legal Services Unit has appealed in the matter (Note 39). In December 2014, Fortum received a non-taxation decision regarding its financing companies for the remaining years 2008-2011, based on the same audit. This is in line with the Supreme Administrative Court's (SAC) precedent decision. The Tax Recipients' Legal Services unit within the tax authorities has the right to appeal the decision.
The new Swedish Government proposed to increase the tax on installed nuclear capacity by 17% as of 2015. This issue is currently on hold. Fortum's position is that the tax issue should be referred to an upcoming parliamentary energy commission in order to get a broadly established view on how the needs of energy and effect can be resolved. If implemented, the estimated impact on Fortum would be approximately EUR 15 million annually, however corporate taxdeductable.
At the end of December 2014, approximately 50% of Power and Technology's estimated Nordic power sales volume was hedged at approximately EUR 40 per MWh for the calendar year 2015. The corresponding figures for the calendar year 2016 were approximately 10% at approximately EUR 39 per MWh.
The hedge price for Power and Technology's Nordic generation excludes hedging of the condensing power margin. In addition, the hedge ratio excludes the financial hedges and physical volume of Fortum's coal-condensing generation as well as the segment's imports from Russia.
The reported hedge ratios may vary significantly, depending on Fortum's actions on the electricity derivatives markets. Hedges are mainly financial contracts, most of them Nord Pool forwards.
Sustainability is at the core of Fortum's strategy, and Fortum's research and development (R&D) activities promote environmentally-benign energy solutions. Investments in the development of renewable energy production, like solar power, are an important part of Fortum's strategy implementation.
In 2014, Fortum, UPM and Valmet joined forces to develop a new technology to produce advanced, high-value lignocellulosic fuels, such as transportation fuels, or higher value bio liquids in order to develop catalytic pyrolysis technology for upgrading bio-oil and to commercialise the new technology.
Fortum also signed an agreement with Cleantech Invest Plc on partnership with regard to business development activities, potential future cleantech investments as well as information sharing. The company also started a collaboration with St1 to build Finland's first industrial-scale geothermal pilot heat plant. St1 will begin planning the pilot production plant, which is estimated to be completed in 2016.
Furthermore, Fortum's leasing agreement signed during the period with the UK-based Wave Hub provides Fortum with an opportunity to study advanced, full-scale wave power converters in ocean conditions. Fortum also acquired a minority share in the Finnish wave energy developer Wello Oy.
The Group reports its R&D expenditure on a yearly basis. In 2014, Fortum's R&D expenditure was EUR 41 million (2013: 49) or 0.9% (2013: 0.9%) of sales.
| Change | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| 2014 | 2013 | 14/13 | |
| R&D expenditure, EUR million | 41 | 49 | -16% |
| R&D expenditure, % of sales | 0.9 | 0.9 | 0% |
Fortum strives for balanced management of economic, social and environmental responsibility in the company's operations. Fortum's sustainability targets consist of Group-level key indicators and division-level indicators.
The Group-level sustainability targets emphasise Fortum's role in society and measure not only environmental and safety targets, but also Fortum's reputation,
customer satisfaction, and the security of supply of power and heat.
The achievement of the sustainability targets is monitored through monthly, quarterly and annual reporting.
Sustainability target-setting and follow-up as well as the approval of Fortum's Sustainability policy and the review of Fortum's Sustainability Report are included in the working order of the Board of Directors.
The company is listed on STOXX Global ESG Leaders, the NASDAQ, OMX GES Sustainability Finland and ECPI® indices. Fortum is also included in the Carbon Disclosure Project's Nordic Climate Index and has received Prime Status (B-) rating by the German oekom research AG.
| Target | 2014 | Five-year average | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Specific CO2 emissions from power generation in the EU as a five-year | |||
| average, g/kWh | < 80 | 39 | 60 |
| Specific CO2 emissions from total energy production (electricity and heat) | |||
| as a five-year average, g/kWh | < 200 | 189 | 198 |
| Overall efficiency of fuel use as a five-year average, % | > 70 | 64 | 63 |
| Major EHS incidents | < 35 | 27 | - |
| Energy availability of CHP plants, % | > 95 | 94.7 | - |
| SAIDI, (minutes), Sweden | < 100 | 97 | - |
| Lost workday injury frequency (LWIF) for own personnel | < 1.0 | 1.0 | - |
| Lost workday injury frequency (LWIF) for contractors | < 3.5 | 3.2 | - |
Targets for reputation and customer satisfaction are monitored annually. Company reputation among the key stakeholders in the One Fortum Survey in 2014 improved to 70.4 (2013: 69.8) i.e. slightly below the target of 70.8. Customer satisfaction improved in all Divisions, and the Group target (70-74 points) was achieved in the Heat and Power Solutions business areas.
In the area of economic responsibility, the focus is on competitiveness, performance excellence and market-driven production. The aim is to create long-term economic value and enable profitable growth and added value for shareholders, customers, employees, suppliers and other key stakeholders in the company's operating areas. Fortum's goal is to achieve excellent financial performance in strategically selected core areas through strong competence and responsible ways of operating. The key figures by which Fortum measures its financial success include return on capital employed (target: 12%), return on shareholders' equity (target: 14%) and capital structure (target: net debt/EBITDA around 3). In addition, as of January 1, 2014, Fortum had used the applicable Global Reporting
Initiative (GRI) G4 indicators for reporting economic responsibility.
Fortum supports social development and well-being of the areas of operations by e.g. paying taxes. The tax benefits Fortum produces to society include not only corporate income taxes EUR 199 million (2013: 186) but also several other taxes. In 2014, Fortum's taxes borne were EUR 525 million (2013: 558). Taxes borne include corporate income taxes, production taxes, employment taxes, taxes on property and cost of indirect taxes. Production taxes include also production taxes and taxes on property paid through electricity purchased from associated companies.
Fortum's effective income tax rate was 5.9% (2013: 13.3%) and total tax rate14.3% (2013: 31.8%). See also note 14 Income tax expense.
The effective income tax rate, excluding the changes in the tax rates, the impact of the share of profits of associated companies and joint ventures as well as non-taxable capital gains was 18.8% (2013: 22.7%).
The total tax rate excluding the impact of the share of profits of associated companies and joint ventures as well as non-taxable capital gains was 38.2% (2013: 36.6%). In addition, Fortum administers and collects different taxes on behalf of governments and authorities. Such taxes include e.g. VAT, excise taxes on power consumed by customers, payroll taxes and withholding taxes. The amount of taxes collected by Fortum was EUR 527 million (2013: 700).
The total tax rate excluding the impact of the share of profits of associated companies and joint ventures as well as non-taxable capital gains was 38.2% (2013: 36.6%).
In addition, Fortum administers and collects different taxes on behalf of governments and authorities. Such taxes include e.g. VAT, excise taxes on power consumed by customers, payroll taxes and withholding taxes. The amount of taxes collected by Fortum was EUR 527 million (2013: 700).
33 Total tax rate, % Taxes borne 2014 by country, EUR million
Fortum's environmental responsibility emphasises mitigation of climate change, efficient use of resources as well as management of the impacts of our energy production, distribution and supply chain. Our know-how in CO2-free hydro and nuclear power production and in energy-efficient CHP production is highlighted in environmental responsibility. Fortum's Group-level environmental targets are related to CO2 emissions, energy efficiency as well as major environmental, health and safety (EHS) incidents. At the end of December 2014, ISO 14001 certification covered 100% of Fortum's power and heat production and distribution operations worldwide.
Fortum's climate targets over the next five years are: specific CO2 emissions from power generation in the EU below 80 grams per kilowatt-hour (g/kWh) and total specific CO2 emissions from both electricity and heat production in all countries below 200 g/kWh. Both targets are calculated as a five-year average. At the end of December 2014, the five-year average for specific CO2 emissions from power generation in the EU was at 60 g/kWh (2013: 60) and the total specific CO2 emissions from energy production was at 198 g/kWh (2013: 197), both better than the target level.
Fortum's total CO2 emissions in 2014 amounted to 20.2 million tonnes (Mt) (2013: 20.5), of which 3.6 Mt (2013: 5.1) were within the EU's emissions trading scheme (ETS). Since 2013, electricity production has not received free allowances in the EU ETS. The amount of free allowances for heat will gradually decrease during 2013-2020 as well. Fortum's free allowances in 2014 totalled 1.4 Mt.
| Change | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Fortum's total CO2 emissions (million tonnes, Mt) | 2014 | 2013 | 14/13 |
| Total emissions | 20.2 | 20.5 | -1% |
| Emissions subject to ETS | 3.6 | 5.1 | -29% |
| Free emission allocation | 1.4 | 1.8 | -22% |
| Emissions in Russia | 16.6 | 15.3 | 8% |
Fortum's energy-efficiency target was to raise the overall efficiency of fuel use to 70% as a five-year average. In 2014, the overall efficiency of fuel use was 64% (2013: 59%) and the five-year average after December 2014 was 63% (2013: 64%), meaning the target level was not met.
Fortum's target is for fewer than 35 major EHS incidents annually. In 2014, a total of 27 (2013: 35) major EHS incidents took place in Fortum's operations. This includes 15 environmental permit non-compliances, four explosions, four oil leaks into the environment, three fires and one International Nuclear Event Scale1 incident (INES). These EHS incidents did not have significant environmental or financial impacts, but the explosion in the Pyrolysis unit in Joensuu in March 2014 caused a prolonged interruption in the production of pyrolysis oil. The cause
of the explosion has been identified, and work to restart production is ongoing.
n the area of social responsibility, Fortum's innovations and the secure supply of lowcarbon power and heat support the development of society and increase wellbeing. Good corporate citizenship, reliable energy supply and ensuring a safe working environment for all employees and contractors at Fortum sites are emphasised. At the end of December 2014, OHSAS 18001 certification covered 75% of Fortum's power and heat production and distribution operations worldwide.
In 2014, the average energy availability of Fortum's CHP plants was 94.7%, which is slightly below the annual target level of 95%. In electricity distribution in Sweden, the cumulative SAIDI (System Average Interruption Duration Index) was 97 (2013: 103) minutes, while the annual target is less than 100 minutes.
The lost workday injury frequency (LWIF) for Fortum employees was 1.0 (2013: 1.0) in 2014. This complies with the Group-level frequency target of less than one per million working hours for own personnel. The lostworkday injury frequency for contractors has improved and was 3.2 (2013: 3.9). Unfortunately, there were three fatal accidents for contractors in Fortum's
operations, two in Sweden and one in Russia. Additionally, in Fortum Värme's CHP8 project, there was a serious accident in November in which two contractors' employees perished. Implementation of agreed actions to improve contractor safety continues with a specific focus on construction projects. Fortum's categorical target is to avoid serious injuries.
Fortum wants to conduct business with viable companies that act responsibly and comply with the Fortum Code of Conduct and the Fortum Supplier Code of Conduct. In 2014, Fortum audited altogether 13 suppliers located in Bulgaria, China, Czech Republic, Poland, Russia and Sweden.
Risk management is an integrated part of business planning and performance management. The objective of risk management within Fortum is to support the creation of the corporate strategy, enable the strategy execution, support the achievement of agreed financial targets and avoid unwanted operational events.
Involvement in the power and heat business exposes Fortum to several types of risks. The main sources of risk in the Nordic business are electricity prices and volumes, which in turn are affected by the weather in the Nordic region, the development of the global commodity markets and availability of power production. The Russian business is exposed to risks related to fuel, electricity and capacity prices and volumes, which are to a large extent subject to regulation, although the market is developing.
Fortum is continuously developing its risk management capabilities to cope with
prevailing market conditions, developing operations and an ever changing business environment. In the operational risk management area, the focus has been on further enhancing the framework for internal controls, compliance risk management and business continuity management. There is continuos improvement in market and credit risk modelling in order to cope with an increasingly global and volatile market. Also the new market entries like India add complexity and risk in operations. Therefore new practices for country and partner assessments have been created and processes implemented. These processes
also include sustainability and human rights impact assessment.
The objective of risk management within Fortum is to support the creation of the corporate strategy, enable the straregy execution, support the achievement of agreed financial targets and avoid unwanted operational events.
Fortum's Board of Directors annually approves the Group Risk Policy, which sets the objective, principles and division of responsibilities for risk management activities within the Group as well as defines the overall risk management process.
The CEO approves Group Risk Policy appendices, which include instructions for managing commodity market risks, counterparty risks, operational risks, financial risks, compliance risks and insurances. Corporate Treasury is responsible for managing the Group's currency, interest rate, liquidity and refinancing risks as well as for insurance management. Credit Control in Corporate Risk Management is responsible for assessing and consolidating the Group's
exposure to counterparty risks, monitoring the creditworthiness of counterparties and approving counterparty credit limits. Corporate IT is responsible for managing IT information and security risks. There are also corporate units dealing with risks related to human resources, laws and regulation, and sustainability.
The Audit and Risk Committee is responsible for risk oversight within the Group. Corporate Risk Management is an independent function headed by the Chief Risk Officer (CRO), who reports to the CFO, and is responsible for assessing and reporting the Group's consolidated risk exposure to the Board of Directors and Group Management. Corporate Risk Management also monitors and reports risks in relation to mandates approved by the CEO. The main principle is that risks are managed at the source, unless otherwise agreed. In order to maintain a strict segregation of duties, risk control functions in the divisions and corporate units, like Treasury, are responsible for reporting risks to Corporate Risk Management. In connection with the organisation change, in March 2014, the Division Risk Control teams in the three COO divisions were centralised; that now the responsibility for risk control services for these divisions is shared and based on the requirements set by Corporate Risk Management.
The risk management process consists of identification of risks, risk assessment, risk response and risk control. Risks are primarily identified and assessed by divisions and corporate units in accordance with Group instructions and models that are approved by Corporate Risk Management. Every function is also responsible for responding to risks by taking appropriate actions. Risk responses can be one of, or a combination of, mitigating, transferring or absorbing the risk.
Risk control, monitoring and reporting is carried out by both the divisional and corporate unit risk control functions. The frequency of reporting is dependent upon the scope of the business. For example, trading activities and limit breaches are reported
daily whereas strategic and operational risks are reported as part of the annual business planning process and followed up at least quarterly in management reviews. Corporate Risk Management assesses and reports the Group's consolidated exposure to financial
and market risks to Group Management and the Board of Directors on a monthly basis.
Fortum's strategy is based on three areas of focus:
Fortum's growth strategy includes expansion of operations. As a result of ongoing integrations or any future acquisitions, there is a risk to existing operations, including:
The political and regulatory environment has a clear impact on energy businesses. This applies both to existing and potential new businesses and market areas. Fortum is thus exposed to regulatory risks in various countries.
Nordic/EU Policy harmonisation, infrastructure development and integration of the Nordic electricity market towards continental Europe depend to large extent on the actions of authorities. The current trend of national policies could even endanger market-driven development of the energy sector and the uncertainty with regard to future policy targets and framework is currently considerable. Fortum favours market-driven development, which would mean e.g. more interconnections and competition in addition to policy harmonisation, by maintaining an active dialogue with all stakeholders.
Currently the biggest potential risks within the policy framework relate to the electricity market model, targets with regard to future climate change mitigation and renewable energy and taxation.
In particular, the interlinkages of these issues create uncertainty, as they are overlapping and undermine the effects of each other.
The EU is currently discussing capacity remuneration mechanisms that would change the market model. The specific details of targets for CO2 emissions and renewables for 2030 are also under discussion. The planned Government Bill for a windfall tax on some non-emitting and old power plants was removed during 2014. Furthermore, the nuclear safety directive is under revision, and a discussion on broadening nuclear liability in the EU is starting.
All these would pose risks, but also opportunities, for energy companies. To manage these risks and proactively participate in the development of the political and regulatory framework, Fortum maintains an active dialogue with the bodies involved in the development of laws and regulations at national and EU-levels.
Russia is exposed to political, economic and social uncertainties and risks resulting from changes in policies, legislation, economic and social upheaval and other similar factors, as other countries. The Ukraine crisis and EU and US sanctions have increased the risks and made the business environment for Russian business more challenging. Fortum is continuously monitoring the development and impliments risk mitigation actions if deemed necessary.
Fortum owns and operates heat and power generation assets in Russia under the operations of OAO Fortum. The wholesale power market deregulation in Russia has proceeded well, and to a large extent, according to original plans. The main policyrelated risks in Russia are linked to the development of the whole energy sector, part of which, namely wholesale electricity, is liberalised while other parts, like gas, heat, and retail electricity, are not. Currently, there is the risk that the Government will freeze tariffs of certain regulated products including gas, which creates a risk for Fortum's efficient operations. Cross-subsidies, which are supposed to be eliminated but still exist, compromise the competitiveness of energyefficient combined heat and power (CHP) production. Artificially low energy prices do not benefit anyone in the long run, as they promote inefficiency by limiting investments efficient capacity.
The current economic situation in Fortum's key operating territories has created an unstable tax environment that is leading to
new or increased taxes and new interpretations of existing tax laws. This in turn has led to unexpected challenges for Fortum in the way the Group is organised and how its operations are taxed. The certainty and visibility around taxes has decreased. Where there is uncertainty, Fortum seeks to maintain its position in line with its tax policy.
Fortum's operations are subject to rules and regulations set forth by the relevant authorities, exchanges, and other regulatory bodies in all markets in which it operates.
Inadequacies in the legal systems and law enforcement mechanisms expose Fortum to a risk of loss resulting from possible illegal or abusive practices by competitors, suppliers, or contracting parties. Fortum's ability to operate in Russia may also be adversely affected by difficulties in protecting and enforcing its rights in disputes with its contractual partners or other parties concerning, for example, regulatory influence on business and unfair market conditions, and also by future changes to local laws and regulations.
Fortum maintains strict internal market conduct rules and has procedures in place to prevent, for example, the use of confidential information before it is published.
Segregation of duties and internal controls are enforced to minimise the possibilities of unauthorised activities.
Compliance with competition legislation is an important area for Fortum. Fortum has enhanced its compliance risk management by establishing a process to systematically and separately identify and mitigate compliance risks linked to the operational risk framework. This process also includes risks related to sustainability and business ethics and aims to capture also potential bribery risks. Fortum has zero tolerance against corruption. Systematic compliance risk management has also been enhanced by forming a crossfunctional network sharing views on changing regulations. Fortum has also established a Code of Conduct, including bribery risk assessment process, to enhance the compliance to business ethics.
Corporate Risk Management, together with other functions like the tax department and sustainability unit, has developed a country and partner risk evaluation processes to support understanding of compliance needs at local and business partner level.The review of compliance risks assessment is periodic, documented and discussed with the Compliance Risk Network, with the Fortum Executive Management Team having oversight of the process. A systematic compliance risk assessment is included in the business plans, and follow-up is a part of the business performance review. Line management regularly reports on the ethical compliance activities to the Fortum Executive Management Team and further to the Audit and Risk Committee. Fortum employees are encouraged to report suspected misconduct to their own supervisors, to other management or, if necessary, directly to Internal Audit.
Commodity market risk refers to the potential negative effects of market price movements or volume changes in electricity, fuels and environmental values. A number of different methods, such as Profit-at-Risk and Value-at-Risk, are used throughout the Group to quantify these risks and to take into account their interdependencies. Stress-testing is carried out in order to assess the effects of extreme price movements on Fortum's earnings.
Fortum hedges its exposure to commodity market risks in accordance with the Hedging Guidelines. Risk taking is limited by risk mandates, including volumetric limits, Profitat-Risk limits and stop-loss limits. The Profitat-Risk measure in the form of Group minimum EBITDA is monitored by management to ensure that Fortum can deliver on its financial commitments without weakening its financial position. The development of minimum EBITDA is monitored in quarterly meetings and in monthly reporting.
All products and marketplaces used for hedging and trading are approved by the CRO.
For further information on hedge ratios, exposures, sensitivities and outstanding derivatives contracts, see Note 3 Financial risk management.
Fortum is exposed to electricity market price movements and volume changes mainly through its power generation and customer sales businesses. In competitive markets, such as in the Nordic region, the price is determined as the balance between supply and demand. The short-term factors affecting electricity prices on the Nordic market include hydrological conditions, temperature,
CO2 allowance prices, fuel prices, and the import/export situation.
In the Nordic business, power and heat generation, customer sales and electricity distribution volumes are subject to changes in, for example, hydrological conditions and temperature. Uncertainty in nuclear production due to prolonged maintenance or delays in upgrades, especially in co-owned plants in Sweden, has also increased in recent years.
Electricity price and volume risks are hedged by entering into electricity derivatives contracts, primarily on the Nordic power exchange, Nasdaq Commodities (Nord Pool). The objective of hedging is to reduce the effect of electricity price volatility on earnings and cash flows, and to secure a minimum level of cash flow, which ensures that financial commitments can be met. Hedging strategies cover several years in the short to medium term and are executed by the trading unit within set mandates. These hedging strategies are continuously evaluated as electricity and other commodity market
prices, the hydrological balance and other relevant parameters change.
In Russia, electricity prices and capacity sales are the main sources of market risk. Market deregulation has developed as planned and the electricity price is highly correlated with the gas price. Hedges are mainly done through regulated bilateral agreements, but the financial market is developing and Fortum is utilising the possibilities in these markets to further mitigate electricity price risks.
The European Union has established an emissions trading scheme to reduce the amount of CO2 emissions. The CO2 emissions trading scheme enhances the integration of the Nordic market with the rest of Europe. In addition to the emissions trading scheme, there are other trading schemes in environmental values in place in Sweden, Norway and Poland. There is currently no trading scheme in Russia for
emissions or other environmental values. The main factor influencing the prices of CO2 allowances and other environmental values is the supply and demand balance.
Part of Fortum's power and heat generation is subject to requirements of these schemes. Fortum manages its exposure to these prices and volumes through the use of derivatives, such as CO2 forwards, and by ensuring that the costs of allowances are taken into account during production planning.
Heat and power generation requires the use of fuels that are purchased on global or local markets. The main fuels used by Fortum are uranium, coal, natural gas, peat, oil, and various biomass-based fuels such as wood pellets.
For fuels that are traded on global markets such as coal and oil, the uncertainty in price is the main factor. Prices are largely affected by demand and supply imbalances that can be caused by, for example, increased demand growth in developing countries, natural disasters or supply constraints in countries experiencing political or social unrest. The main fuel source for heat and power generation in Russia is natural gas. Natural gas prices are partially regulated, so the exposure is limited. For fuels traded on local markets, such as bio-fuels, the volume risk in terms of access to the raw material of appropriate quality is more significant as there may be a limited number of suppliers. Due to the sanctions and economic development in Russia, the risks related to imported fuels from Russia have been increased.
Exposure to fuel prices is limited to some extent because of Fortum's flexible generation possibilities that allow for switching between different fuels according to prevailing market conditions and, in some cases, the fuel price risk can be transferred to the customer. The remaining exposure to fuel price risk is mitigated through fixed-price purchases that cover forecasted consumption levels. Fixed-price purchases can be either for physical deliveries or in the form of financial hedges.
The power and heat business is capital intensive. Consequently, Fortum has a regular need to raise financing.
In order to manage these risks, Fortum maintains a diversified financing structure in terms of debt maturity profile, debt instruments and geographical markets. Fortum manages liquidity and refinancing risks through a combination of cash positions and committed credit facility agreements with its core banks. Fortum shall at all times have access to cash, bank deposits and unused committed credit facilities, including overdrafts, to cover all loans maturing within the next twelve-month period. Due to the volatile rouble develpoment and sanctions imposed, special attention has been paid to ensure that Russia Division has sufficient
liquidity to undertake committed investments.
Fortum's debt portfolio consists of interestbearing assets and liabilities on a fixed- and floating-rate basis with differing maturity profiles. Fortum manages the duration of the debt portfolio by entering into different types of financing contracts and interest rate derivative contracts, such as interest rate swaps and forward rate agreements (FRAs).
Fortum has cash flows, assets and liabilities in currencies other than the euro. Changes in exchange rates can therefore have an effect on Fortum's earnings and balance sheet. The main currency exposures are EUR/RUB from translation exposure of OAO Fortum in Russia and EUR/SEK, arising from Fortum's
extensive operations in Sweden. Due to the low oil prices and weakened Russian economy, also the rouble has weakened and volatility of the exchange rate versus the euro has increased in 2014. The weaker rouble is effecting Fortum's profit level and equity when translating the Russia Division results and net assets to euros.
Fortum's currency exposures are divided into transaction exposures (foreign exchange exposures relating to contracted cash flows and balance sheet items where changes in exchange rates will have an impact on earnings and cash flows) and translation exposure (foreign exchange exposure that arises when profits and balance sheets in foreign entities are consolidated at the Group level). For transaction risks, the main principle is that all material exposures are hedged while translation exposures are not hedged or are hedged selectively. The rouble exposures are monitored continuously.
Fortum is exposed to counterparty risk whenever there is a contractual arrangement with an external party; customer, supplier, financing partner or trading counterparty. During 2013 Fortum enhanced the country entry and partner risk assessment processes when entering new markets and/ or partnerships. These processes have been fully implemented during 2014.
Credit risk exposures relating to financial derivative instruments are often volatile. Although the majority of commodity derivatives are cleared through exchanges, derivatives contracts are also entered into directly with external counterparties. Such contracts are limited to high-credit-quality counterparties active on the financial or commodity markets.
Due to the financing needs and management of liquidity, Fortum has counterparty exposure to a number of banks and financial institutions. This includes exposure to the Russian financial sector in terms of deposits
with financial institutions as well as to banks that provide guarantees for suppliers and contracting parties. Limits with banks and financial institutions are followed closely so that exposures can be adjusted as ratings or the financial situation changes. Fortum is closely following the sanction development in Russia. Special attention is put to the credit risk management.
Credit risk exposures relating to customers and suppliers are spread across a wide range of industrial counterparties, small businesses and private individuals over a range of geographic regions. The majority of exposure is to the Nordic market, but there is also significant exposure in Russia and Poland as a result of increased operations. The risk of non-payment in the electricity and heat sales business in Russia is higher than in the Nordic market.
In order to minimise counterparty risk, Fortum has well established routines and processes to identify, assess and control counterparty exposure. No contractual obligations are entered into without proper, reasonable and viable credit checks, and creditworthiness is continuously monitored through the use of internal and external sources to ensure that actions can be taken immediately if changes occur.
Corporate Credit Control is responsible for assuring stringent controls for all larger individual counterparty exposures. Annual credit reviews are performed manually for all larger approved limits. Each division or corporate unit is responsible for ensuring that exposures remain within approved limits. Mitigation of counterparty risk includes the use of collateral, such as guarantees, managing payment terms and contract length, and netting agreements. Corporate Credit Control continuously monitors and reports counterparty exposures against the approved limits.
Operational risks are defined as the negative effects resulting from inadequate or failed internal processes, people and systems or equipment, or from external events. The main objective of operational risk management is to reduce the risk of unwanted operational events by clearly documenting and automating processes and by ensuring a strict segregation of duties between decisionmaking and controlling functions. Quality, environmental and occupational health and safety management systems are tools for achieving this objective. Fortum's operational activies are 100% ISO 14001 certified. The coverage of OHSAS 18001 certification is 74%. Equipment and system risks are primarily managed within maintenance investment planning, and there are contingency plans in place to ensure business continuity. Operational risks in production facilities (nuclear, hydro and heat plants) are mitigated by continuous maintenance, condition monitoring, and other operational improvements.
The Group Insurance Instructions defines the management of insurable operational risks. The objective of insurance management is to optimise loss prevention activities, self retentions and insurance coverage in a longterm cost-efficient manner. Fortum has established Group-wide insurance programmes for risks related to property damages, business interruption and liability exposures.
Operational events at hydro power generation facilities can lead to physical damages, business interruptions, and third- party liabilities. A long-term programme is in place for improving the surveillance of the condition of dams and for securing the discharge capacity in extreme flood situations.
In Sweden, third-party liabilities from dam failures are strictly the plant owner's responsibility. Together with other hydro power producers, Fortum has a shared dam liability insurance programme in place that covers Swedish dam failure liabilities up to SEK 9,000 million.
Fortum owns the Loviisa nuclear power plant, and has minority interests in one Finnish and two Swedish nuclear power companies. At
the Loviisa power plant, the assessment and improvement of nuclear safety is a continuous process performed under the supervision of the Radiation and Nuclear Safety Authority of Finland (STUK).
In Finland and Sweden, third-party liability relating to nuclear accidents is strictly the plant operator's responsibility and must be covered by insurance.
As the operator of the Loviisa power plant, Fortum has a statutory liability insurance policy of 600M SDR (Special Drawing Right). The same type of insurance policies are in place for the operators where Fortum has a minority interest. In Sweden, the limits are compliant with the national legislation.
Decisions have been made in both Finland and Sweden to renew the current nuclear liability legislation to align more with the Paris and Brussels convention. The new legislation is not likely to come into force during 2015 in Finland and Sweden. The changes in the new national legislation consist of a liability on plant operators covering damages up to EUR 700 million in Finland and up to EUR 1,200 million per nuclear incident in Sweden. The liability should be covered by insurance or other form of financial guarantee, as well as a strict and unlimited liability for the plant operators in each respective country.
Under Finnish law, Fortum bears full legal and financial responsibility for the management and disposal of nuclear waste produced by the Loviisa power plant. In both Finland and Sweden, Fortum bears partial responsibility, proportionate to the output share, for the costs of the management and disposal of nuclear waste produced by coowned nuclear power plants.
In both Finland and Sweden, the future costs of the final disposal of spent fuel, the management of low and intermediate-level radioactive waste and nuclear power plant decommissioning are provided for by a stateestablished fund to which nuclear power plant operators make annual contributions.
Multi-layered containment systems and sophisticated safety protocols effectively isolate radioactive materials from the surrounding environment during the process of interim storage, packaging, transport, relocation and encasement of nuclear waste in the final storage repositories.
Operational events at distribution facilities can lead to physical damages, business interruptions, and third-party liabilities. Storms and other unexpected events can result in electricity outages that create costs in the form of repairs and customer compensations. Although outages are typically short, it is not possible to completely prevent long outages. There are extensive procedures in place to minimise the length and consequences of outages. After the divestments in Finland and Norway, Fortum is exposed to distributions risks only in Sweden.
The assessment of sustainability risks is also included in the assessment of business risks. The Corporate Sustainability function assesses the risks related to both Group and their own operations as part of the annual planning. The divisions assess the risks identified by the Corporate Sustainability function in their own annual planning and prepare for their control. Business divisions with ISO 14001 certification manage their environmental risks and their preparedness to operate in exceptional and emergency situations in compliance with the requirements of the standard. The same approach applies to risks management related to occupational health and safety and actions in emergency situations for operations with OHSAS 18001 certification.
Operating power and heat generation and distribution facilities involves the use, storage and transportation of fuels and materials that can have adverse effects on the environment. Operation and maintenance of the facilities expose the personnel to potential safety risks. The risks involved with these activities and their supply chain are receiving increased attention. There is also a growing public awareness of sustainable development and the expectations on companies' responsible conduct.
Environmental, health and safety (EHS) risks as well as social risks related to Fortum's activities are regularly evaluated through internal and external audits and risk assessments, and corrective and preventive actions are launched when necessary. EHS related risks together with social risks arising in investments are systematically evaluated in accordance with Fortum's Investment
Evaluation and Approval Procedure. Environmental risks and liabilities in relation to past actions have been assessed and necessary provisions made for future remedial costs.
Fortum actively explores opportunities in new technologies in a solar economy. Fortum is participating in technologies and projects in solar and wave energy, and since 2013 Fortum has operated its first solar plant in India. New technologies, like bio-oil and solar, expose Fortum to new types of risks, such as IPR risks and viability of technologies. These,
in combination with operating in new markets, add complexity.
Information security risks are managed centrally by the Corporate Security and IT functions. Business-specific IT risks are managed within the divisions and corporate units. Group IT instructions set procedures for reducing risks and managing IT and other information security incidents. The main objective is to ensure high availability and fast recovery of IT systems. Fortum's IT
community identifies the ITrelated operational risks that might threaten business continuity, and the mitigating actions are planned accordingly. Fortum IT is exposed to hardware and software risks including cyber attacks, as is any other corporate function, however, taking into account the size and complexity of the business. The management of these risks is coordinated by Corporate IT, headed by the CIO, who also manages the IT architecture and strategy.
Fortum Corporation's shares have been listed on Nasdaq Helsinki since 18 December 1998. The trading code is FUM1V. Fortum Corporation's shares are in the Finnish book entry system maintained by Euroclear Finland Ltd which also maintains the official share register of Fortum Corporation
| Share key figures | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| EUR | 2014 | 2013 | 2012 |
| Earnings per share | 3.55 | 1.36 | 1.59 |
| Cash flow per share | 1.98 | 1.74 | 1.56 |
| Equity per share | 12.23 | 11.28 | 11.30 |
| Dividend per share | 1) 1.10 |
1.10 | 1.00 |
| Extra dividend per share | 1) 0.20 |
||
| Payout ratio, % | 1) 36.6 |
80.9 | 62.9 |
| Dividend yield, % | 1) 7.2 |
6.6 | 7.1 |
1) Board of Directors' proposal for the Annual General Meeting 31 March 2015.
Fortum's mission is to deliver excellent value to it's shareholders. Fortum's share price has depreciated approximately 8% during the last five years, while Dow Jones European Utility Index has decreased 9%. During the same period Nasdaq Helsinki Cap index has increased 28%. During 2014 Fortum's share price appreciated approximately 8%, while Dow Jones European Utility index increased 13% and Nasdaq Helsinki Cap index increased 6%.
During 2014, a total of 454.8 million (2013: 465.0) Fortum Corporation shares, totalling EUR 8,134 million, were traded on the Nasdaq Helsinki. The highest quotation of Fortum Corporation shares during 2014 was EUR 20.32, the lowest EUR 15.13, and the volume-weighted average EUR 17.89. The closing quotation on the last trading day of the year 2014 was EUR 17.97 (2013: 16.63). Fortum's market capitalisation, calculated using the closing quotation of the last trading day of the year, was EUR 15,964 million (2013: 14,774).
In addition to the Nasdaq Helsinki, Fortum shares were traded on several alternative market places, for example at Boat, BATS Chi-X and Turquoise, and on the OTC market as well. In 2014, approximately 58% (2013: 58%) of Fortum's shares were traded on markets other than the Nasdaq Helsinki Ltd.
Acquisition of Stora Enso power generation assets 1.9 bn EUR
Birka acquisition remaining 50% 3.6 bn EUR
Sale of Fortum Energie GmbH 545 MEUR
Ministry of Trade and Industry sells down to 61%
Sale of Norwegian E&P for \$1.1 bn
Asset swap worth 800 MEUR gaining shareholdings in Hafslund and Lenenergo
Increase in Hafslund stake to 31%
Increase in Lenenergo stake
Dividending out and sale of Neste Oil shares market value 3.8 bn EUR
Ministry of Trade and Industry sells down to 51.7%
Acquisition of Wroclaw 120 MEUR
E.ON Finland acquisition 713 MEUR
Sale of Russian Lenenergo stake for 295 MEUR
Participation in 243 MEUR share issue in TGC-1
Acquisition of TGC-10 (Changed name to OAO Fortum) EUR 2.5 bn
Divestment of district heat operations outside Stockholm area in Sweden, total sales price appr. 220 MEUR
Final agreement over sale of Fingrid shares appr. 325 MEUR
Fortum agreed to sell Fortum Energiaratkaisut Oy and Fortum Termest AS total sales price appr. 200 MEUR
Fortum agreed to sell its electricity distribution business in Finland for a total consideration of EUR 2.55 billion
Fortum agreed to sell its Norwegian electricity distribution and heat businesses for 340 MEUR
Divestment of shares in Gasum Oy for 310 MEUR
Fortum and Gazprom Energoholding signed a protocol to start a restructuring process of their ownership of TGC-1
Fortum has one class of shares. By the end of 2014, a total of 888,367,045 shares had been issued. Each share entitles the holder to one vote at the Annual General Meeting. All shares entitle holders to an equal dividend. At the end of 2014 Fortum Corporation's share capital, paid in its entirety and entered in the trade register, was EUR 3,046,185,953.00.
At the end of 2014, the Finnish State owned 50.76% of the company's shares. The Finnish Parliament has authorised the Government to reduce the Finnish State's holding in Fortum
Corporation to no less than 50.1% of the share capital and voting rights.
The proportion of nominee registrations and direct foreign shareholders increased to 32.3 % (2013: 26.2%).
| Shareholders | No. of shares | Holding % |
|---|---|---|
| Prime Minister's Office | 450,932,988 | 50.76 |
| The Finnish Social Insurance Institution | 7,030,896 | 0.79 |
| Kurikan Kaupunki | 6,203,500 | 0.70 |
| The State Pension Fund | 5,960,000 | 0.67 |
| Varma Mutual Pension Insurance Company | 5,224,300 | 0.59 |
| Elo Mutual Pension Insurance Company | 4,620,800 | 0.52 |
| Ilmarinen Mutual Pension Insurance Company | 4,487,880 | 0.51 |
| The Local Government Pensions Institution | 3,679,403 | 0.41 |
| Schweizerische Nationalbank | 2,618,136 | 0.30 |
| Nordea Fennia Fund | 2,174,227 | 0.25 |
| OP-Delta Mutual Fund | 1,725,726 | 0.19 |
| Society of Swedish Literature in Finland | 1,452,675 | 0.16 |
| Nordea Pro Finland Fund | 1,433,767 | 0.16 |
| Nominee registrations and direct foreign ownership* | 284,749,426 | 32.05 |
| Other shareholders in total | 106,073,321 | 11.94 |
| Total number of shares | 888,367,045 | 100.00 |
*Excluding Schweizerische Nationalbank
| By shareholder category | % of total amount of shares |
|---|---|
| Finnish shareholders | |
| Corporations | 1.02 |
| Financial and insurance institutions | 1.61 |
| General government | 55.35 |
| Non-profit organisations | 1.51 |
| Households | 8.16 |
| Non-Finnish shareholders | 32.35 |
| Total | 100.00 |
| % of total amount | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Number of shares owned | No. of shareholders | % of shareholders | No. of shares | of shares |
| 1-100 | 29,472 | 26.94 | 1,721,860 | 0.19 |
| 101-500 | 44,876 | 41.02 | 11,906,551 | 1.34 |
| 501-1,000 | 17,940 | 16.40 | 13,039,313 | 1.47 |
| 1,001-10,000 | 16,212 | 14.82 | 41,048,458 | 4.62 |
| 10,001-100,000 | 817 | 0.75 | 18,561,714 | 2.09 |
| 100,001-1,000,000 | 73 | 0.06 | 21,058,847 | 2.37 |
| 1,000,001-10,000,000 | 12 | 0.01 | 46,611,310 | 5.25 |
| over 10,000,000 | 1 | 0.00 | 450,932,988 | 50.76 |
| 109,403 | 100.00 | 604,881,041 | 68.09 | |
| Unregistered/uncleared transactions on 31 December | 73,636 | 0.01 | ||
| Nominee registrations | 283,412,368 | 31.90 | ||
| Total | 888,367,045 | 100.00 |
At the end of 2014, the President and CEO and other members of the Fortum Executive Management Team owned 430,457 shares (2013: 346,106) representing approximately 0.05% (2013: 0.04%) of the total shares in the company.
A full description of the shareholdings and interests in long-term incentive schemes of the President and CEO and of other members of the Fortum Executive Management Team is shown in Note 12 Employee benefits.
Currently the Board of Directors has no unused authorisations from the Annual General Meeting of Shareholders to issue convertible loans or bonds with warrants to issue new shares or to buy Fortum Corporation's own shares.
The dividend policy ensures that shareholders receive a fair remuneration for their entrusted capital, supported by the company's longterm strategy that aims at increasing earnings per share and thereby the dividend. When proposing the dividend, the Board of Directors looks at a range of factors, including the macro environment, balance sheet strength as well as future investment plans. Fortum Corporation's target is to pay a stable, sustainable and over time increasing dividend, in the range of 50-80% of earnings per share, excluding one-off items.
The distributable funds of Fortum Oyj as at 31 December 2014 amounted to EUR 5,438,689,036.90 including the profit of the period of EUR 2,264,863,648.81. After the end of the financial period there have been no material changes in the financial position of the Company.
The Board of Directors proposes to the Annual General Meeting that a dividend of EUR 1.10 per share be paid for 2014. In
addition the Board of Directors proposes to the Annual General Meeting an extra dividend of EUR 0.20 per share be paid for 2014. Based on the number of registered shares as of 3 February 2015 the total amount of dividend proposed to be paid is EUR 1,154,877,158.50. The Board of Directors proposes, that the remaining part of the profit be retained in the shareholders' equity. The Annual General Meeting will be held on 31 March 2015 at 14:00 EET at Finlandia Hall in Helsinki.
Earnings per share, EUR
Dividend per share, EUR
The dividend for 2014 represents the Board of Directors' proposal for the Annual General Meeting in March 2015
The operations of Fortum Corporation and its subsidiaries (together the Fortum Group) focus on the Nordic and Baltic countries, Russia and Poland. Fortum's activities cover the generation, distribution and sale of electricity and heat, and energy-related expert services. Neste Oil was included in the Fortum Group until 31 March 2005, when the Annual General Meeting made the final decision to separate the oil operations by distributing approximately 85% of Neste Oil Corporation shares as a dividend. The remaining approximately 15% of the shares were sold to investors in April 2005.
Oil operations were presented as discontinued operations in years 2004 and 2005.
From 2005, Fortum applies International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) for the annual and interim reports. The 2005 annual report included one comparison year 2004, which was restated to IFRS.
Information in the tables and graphs presented for year 2012 or earlier is not restated due to the adoption of IFRS 10 and IFRS 11. Adoption of standards influences treatment of Fortum's holding in AB Fortum Värme samägt med Stockholms stad in the the consolidated financial statements. For further information, see Note 1.6.1. New IFRS standards adopted from 1 Jan 2014.
| EUR million | IFRS | IFRS | IFRS | IFRS | IFRS | IFRS | IFRS | IFRS | IFRS | IFRS | IFRS | Change 14/13 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| or as indicated | 2004 | 2005 | 2006 | 2007 | 2008 | 2009 | 2010 | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | 2014 | % |
| Sales total Fortum | 11,659 | 5,918 | 4,491 | 4,479 | 5,636 | 5,435 | 6,296 | 6,161 | 6,159 | 5,309 | 4,751 | -11 |
| Sales continuing operations | 3,835 | 3,877 | 4,491 | 4,479 | 5,636 | 5,435 | 6,296 | 6,161 | 6,159 | 5,309 | 4,751 | -11 |
| EBITDA total Fortum 1) | 2,443 | 2,307 | 1,884 | 2,298 | 2,478 | 2,292 | 2,271 | 3,008 | 2,538 | 2,129 | 3,954 | 86 |
| EBITDA continuing operations | 1,583 | 1,754 | 1,884 | 2,298 | 2,478 | 2,292 | 2,271 | 3,008 | 2,538 | 2,129 | 3,954 | 86 |
| Comparable EBITDA continuing operations | 1,741 | 1,866 | 2,015 | 2,360 | 2,398 | 2,396 | 2,374 | 2,416 | 1,975 | 1,873 | -5 | |
| Operating profit total Fortum | 1,916 | 1,864 | 1,455 | 1,847 | 1,963 | 1,782 | 1,708 | 2,402 | 1,874 | 1,508 | 3,428 | 127 |
| - of sales % | 16.4 | 31.5 | 32.4 | 41.2 | 34.8 | 32.8 | 27.1 | 39.0 | 30.4 | 28.4 | 72.2 | |
| Operating profit continuing operations | 1,195 | 1,347 | 1,455 | 1,847 | 1,963 | 1,782 | 1,708 | 2,402 | 1,874 | 1,508 | 3,428 | 127 |
| - of sales % | 31.2 | 34.7 | 32.4 | 41.2 | 34.8 | 32.8 | 27.1 | 39.0 | 30.4 | 28.4 | 72.2 | |
| Comparable operating profit continuing operations |
1,148 | 1,334 | 1,437 | 1,564 | 1,845 | 1,888 | 1,833 | 1,802 | 1,752 | 1,403 | 1,351 | -4 |
| Profit before income tax total Fortum | 1,700 | 1,776 | 1,421 | 1,934 | 1,850 | 1,636 | 1,615 | 2,228 | 1,586 | 1,398 | 3,360 | 140 |
| - of sales % | 14.6 | 30.0 | 31.6 | 43.2 | 32.8 | 30.1 | 25.7 | 36.2 | 25.8 | 26.3 | 70.7 | |
| Profit before income tax continuing operations |
962 | 1,267 | 1,421 | 1,934 | 1,850 | 1,636 | 1,615 | 2,228 | 1,586 | 1,398 | 3,360 | 140 |
| - of sales % | 25.1 | 32.7 | 31.6 | 43.2 | 32.8 | 30.1 | 25.7 | 36.2 | 25.8 | 26.3 | 70.7 | |
| Profit for the period continuing operations | 703 | 936 | 1,120 | 1,608 | 1,596 | 1,351 | 1,354 | 1,862 | 1,512 | 1,212 | 3,161 | 161 |
| - of which attributable to owners of the parent |
670 | 884 | 1,071 | 1,552 | 1,542 | 1,312 | 1,300 | 1,769 | 1,416 | 1,204 | 3,154 | 162 |
| Capital employed total Fortum | 12,890 | 11,357 | 12,663 | 13,544 | 15,911 | 15,350 | 16,124 | 17,931 | 19,420 | 19,183 | 17,918 | -7 |
| Capital employed continuing operations | 10,739 | 11,357 | 12,663 | 13,544 | 15,911 | 15,350 | 16,124 | 17,931 | 19,420 | 19,183 | 17,918 | -7 |
| Interest-bearing net debt | 5,095 | 3,158 | 4,345 | 4,466 | 6,179 | 5,969 | 6,826 | 7,023 | 7,814 | 7,793 | 4,217 | -46 |
| Interest-bearing net debt without Värme financing |
6,658 | 3,664 | -45 | |||||||||
| Capital expenditure and gross investments in shares total Fortum |
830 | 578 | 1,395 | 972 | 2,624 | 929 | 1,249 | 1,482 | 1,574 | 1,020 | 843 | -17 |
| - of sales % | 7.1 | 9.8 | 31.1 | 21.7 | 46.6 | 17.1 | 19.8 | 24.1 | 25.6 | 19.2 | 15.9 |
| Capital expenditure and gross investments in shares continuing operations |
514 | 479 | 1,395 | 972 | 2,624 | 929 | 1,249 | 1,482 | 1,574 | 1,020 | 843 | -17 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Capital expenditure continuing operations | 335 | 346 | 485 | 655 | 1,108 | 862 | 1,222 | 1,408 | 1,558 | 1,005 | 774 | -23 |
| Net cash from operating activities total Fortum |
1,758 | 1,404 | 1,151 | 1,670 | 2,002 | 2,264 | 1,437 | 1,613 | 1,382 | 1,548 | 1,762 | 14 |
| Net cash from operating activities continuing operations |
1,232 | 1,271 | 1,151 | 1,670 | 2,002 | 2,264 | 1,437 | 1,613 | 1,382 | 1,548 | 1,762 | 14 |
| Return on capital employed total Fortum, % |
15.8 | 16.6 | 13.4 | 16.5 | 15.0 | 12.1 | 11.6 | 14.8 | 10.2 | 9.0 | 19.5 | |
| Return on capital employed continuing operations, % |
11.4 | 13.5 | 13.4 | 16.5 | 15.0 | 12.1 | 11.6 | 14.8 | 10.2 | 9.0 | 19.5 | |
| Return on shareholders' equity total Fortum, % |
18.2 | 18.7 | 14.4 | 19.1 | 18.7 | 16.0 | 15.7 | 19.7 | 14.6 | 12.0 | 30.0 | |
| Return on shareholders' equity continuing operations, % 2) |
13.5 | 14.4 | 19.1 | 18.7 | 16.0 | 15.7 | 19.7 | 14.6 | 12.0 | 30.0 | ||
| Interest coverage | 8.0 | 11.6 | 11.5 | 12.8 | 9.4 | 12.4 | 13.7 | 10.5 | 7.6 | 6.7 | 19.9 | |
| Interest coverage including capitalised borrowing costs |
8.6 | 10.3 | 10.0 | 8.5 | 5.7 | 5.3 | 15.7 | |||||
| Funds from operations/interest-bearing net debt, % |
36.4 | 43.2 | 30.6 | 36.3 | 34.1 | 37.6 | 20.5 | 21.5 | 19.9 | 18.8 | 42.9 | |
| Funds from operations/interest-bearing net debt without Värme financing, % |
22.1 | 49.3 | ||||||||||
| Gearing, % | 67 | 43 | 53 | 52 | 73 | 70 | 78 | 69 | 73 | 77 | 39 | |
| Net debt/EBITDA | 2 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 1.1 | |
| Net debt/EBITDA continuing operations | - | 1.8 | 2.3 | 1.9 | 2.5 | 2.6 | 3.0 | 2.3 | 3.1 | 3.7 | 1.1 | |
| Comparable net debt/EBITDA continuing operations |
- | 1.8 | 2.3 | 2.2 | 2.6 | 2.5 | 2.8 | 3.0 | 3.2 | 3.9 | 2.3 | |
| Comparable net debt/EBITDA without Värme financing |
3.4 | 2.0 | ||||||||||
| Equity-to-assets ratio, % | 44 | 49 | 48 | 49 | 41 | 43 | 40 | 44 | 43 | 43 | 51 | |
| Dividends 3) | 506 | 987 | 1,122 | 1,198 | 888 | 888 | 888 | 888 | 888 | 977 | 1,155 4) | 18 |
| Dividends continuing operations | 511 | 650 | 683 | |||||||||
| Dividends additional in 2006 and 2007/ discontinued operations in 2005 |
476 | 472 | 515 | |||||||||
| Research and development expenditure | 26 | 14 | 17 | 21 | 27 | 30 | 30 | 38 | 41 | 49 | 41 | -16 |
| - of sales % | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.4 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.6 | 0.7 | 0.9 | 0.9 | |
| Average number of employees total Fortum |
12,859 | 10,026 | 8,910 | 8,304 | 14,077 | 13,278 | 11,156 | 11,010 | 10,600 | 9,532 | 8,821 | |
| Average number of employees continuing operations |
8,592 | 8,939 | 8,910 | 8,304 | 14,077 | 13,278 | 11,156 | 11,010 | 10,600 | 9,532 | 8,821 |
1) EBITDA is defined as Operating profit continuing operations + Depreciation, amortisation and impairment charges.
2) Return on equity for continuing operations for 2005 is calculated based on profit for the period from continuing operations divided by total equity at the end of the period. Profit for the period from discontinued operations has been subtracted from total equity on 31 December 2005.
3) In addition to cash dividend Fortum distributed approximately 85% of Neste Oil Corporation shares as dividend in 2005.
4) Board of Directors' proposal for the Annual General Meeting on 31 March 2015.
See Definitions of key figures.
| Change | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EUR or | IFRS | IFRS | IFRS | IFRS | IFRS | IFRS | IFRS | IFRS | IFRS | IFRS | IFRS | 14/13 |
| as indicated | 2004 | 2005 | 2006 | 2007 | 2008 | 2009 | 2010 | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | 2014 | % |
| Earnings per share total Fortum |
1.48 | 1.55 | 1.22 | 1.74 | 1.74 | 1.48 | 1.46 | 1.99 | 1.59 | 1.36 | 3.55 | 161 |
| Earnings per share continuing operations |
0.79 | 1.01 | 1.22 | 1.74 | 1.74 | 1.48 | 1.46 | 1.99 | 1.59 | 1.36 | 3.55 | 161 |
| Earnings per share discontinued operations |
0.69 | 0.54 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
| Diluted earnings per share | ||||||||||||
| total Fortum | 1.46 | 1.53 | 1.21 | 1.74 | 1.74 | 1.48 | 1.46 | 1.99 | 1.59 | 1.36 | 3.55 | 161 |
| Diluted earnings per share continuing operations |
0.78 | 1.00 | 1.21 | 1.74 | 1.74 | 1.48 | 1.46 | 1.99 | 1.59 | 1.36 | 3.55 | 161 |
| Diluted earnings per share discontinued operations |
0.68 | 0.53 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
| Cash flow per share total | ||||||||||||
| Fortum | 2.06 | 1.61 | 1.31 | 1.88 | 2.26 | 2.55 | 1.62 | 1.82 | 1.56 | 1.74 | 1.98 | 14 |
| Cash flow per share continuing operations |
1.44 | 1.46 | 1.31 | 1.88 | 2.26 | 2.55 | 1.62 | 1.82 | 1.56 | 1.74 | 1.98 | 14 |
| Equity per share | 8.65 | 8.17 | 8.91 | 9.43 | 8.96 | 9.04 | 9.24 | 10.84 | 11.30 | 11.28 | 12.23 | 8 |
| Dividend per share 1) | 0.58 | 1.12 | 1.26 | 1.35 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.10 | 1.10 2) | 0 |
| Extra dividend | 0.20 2) | |||||||||||
| Dividend per share continuing operations |
- | 0.58 | 0.73 | 0.77 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
| Dividend per share additional in 2006 and 2007/discontinued operations in 2005 |
- | 0.54 | 0.53 | 0.58 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
| Payout ratio, % | 39.2 | 72.3 | 103.3 4) | 77.6 4) | 57.5 | 67.6 | 68.5 | 50.3 | 62.9 | 80.9 | 36.6 2) | |
| Payout ratio continuing operations, % |
- | 57.4 3) | 59.8 4) | 44.3 4) | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
| Payout ratio additional dividend in 2006 and 2007/ discontinued operations in 2005, % |
- | 100.0 3) | 43.4 4) | 33.3 4) | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
| Dividend yield, % | 4.3 | 7.1 | 5.8 | 4.4 | 6.6 | 5.3 | 4.4 | 6.1 | 7.1 | 6.6 | 7.2 2) | |
| Price/earnings ratio (P/E) |
9.2 | 10.2 | 17.7 | 17.7 | 8.8 | 12.8 | 15.4 | 8.3 | 8.9 | 12.2 | 5.1 | |
| Share prices | ||||||||||||
| At the end of the period | 13.62 | 15.84 | 21.56 | 30.81 | 15.23 | 18.97 | 22.53 | 16.49 | 14.15 | 16.63 | 17.97 | |
| Average | 10.29 | 13.87 | 20.39 | 23.57 | 24.79 | 15.91 | 19.05 | 19.77 | 15.66 | 15.11 | 17.89 | |
| Lowest | 7.45 | 10.45 | 15.71 | 20.01 | 12.77 | 12.60 | 17.18 | 15.53 | 12.81 | 13.1 | 15.13 | |
| Highest | 13.99 | 16.90 | 23.48 | 31.44 | 33.00 | 19.20 | 22.69 | 24.09 | 19.36 | 18.18 | 20.32 | |
| Market capitalisation at the end of the period, EUR million |
11,810 | 13,865 | 19,132 | 27,319 | 13,519 | 16,852 | 20,015 | 14,649 | 12,570 | 14,774 | 15,964 |
| Trading volumes 5) | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Number of shares, 1 000 shares |
478,832 | 900,347 | 830,764 | 787,380 | 628,155 | 580,899 | 493,375 | 524,858 | 494,765 | 465,004 | 454,796 | |
| In relation to weighted average number of shares, % |
59.2 | 103.2 | 94.3 | 88.5 | 70.8 | 65.4 | 55.5 | 59.1 | 55.7 | 52.3 | 51.2 | |
| Number of shares, 1 000 shares |
867,084 | 875,294 | 887,394 | 886,683 | 887,638 | 888,367 | 888,367 | 888,367 | 888,367 | 888,367 | 888,367 | |
| Number of shares excluding own shares, 1 000 shares |
N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | |
| Average number of shares, 1 000 shares |
852,625 | 872,613 | 881,194 | 889,997 | 887,256 | 888,230 | 888,367 | 888,367 | 888,367 | 888367 | 888,367 | |
| Diluted adjusted average number of shares, 1 000 shares |
861,772 | 887,653 | 886,929 | 891,395 | 887,839 | 888,230 | 888,367 | 888,367 | 888,367 | 888,367 | 888,367 |
1) In addition to cash dividend Fortum distributed approximately 85% of Neste Oil Corporation shares as dividend in 2005.
2) Board of Directors' proposal for the Annual General Meeting on 31 March 2015.
3) Payout ratios in 2005 are calculated for continuing and discontinued operations based on the respective earnings per share from continuing and discontinued operations.
4) Payout ratios for dividends in 2006 and 2007 are based on the total earnings per share.
5) Trading volumes in the table represent volumes traded on Nasdaq Helsinki. In addition to the Nasdaq Helsinki, Fortum shares were traded on several alternative market places, for example at Boat, BATS Chi-X and Turquoise, and on the OTC market as well. In 2014, approximately 58% (2013: 58%) of Fortum's traded shares were traded on other markets than Nasdaq Helsinki.
See Definitions of key figures.
Information in the tables and graphs presented for year 2012 or earlier is not restated due to the adoption of IFRS 10 and IFRS 11. Adoption of standards influences treatment of Fortum's holding in AB Fortum Värme samägt med Stockholms stad in the the consolidated financial statements. For further information, see Note 1.6.1. New IFRS standards adopted from 1 Jan 2014.
| 2004 | 2005 | 2006 | 2007 | 2008 | 2009 | 2010 | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | 2014 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fortum's total power and heat generation in EU and Norway | ||||||||||||
| Power | ||||||||||||
| generation | TWh | 55.5 | 52.3 | 54.4 | 52.2 | 52.6 | 49.3 | 53.7 | 55.3 | 53.9 | 47.4 | 50.1 |
| Heat generation | TWh | 25.4 | 25.1 | 25.8 | 26.1 | 25.0 | 23.2 | 26.1 | 22.0 | 18.5 | 10.4 | 8.2 |
| Fortum's total power and heat generation in Russia | ||||||||||||
| Power | ||||||||||||
| generation | TWh | - | - | - | - | 11.6 | 16.0 | 16.1 | 17.4 | 19.2 | 20.0 | 23.3 |
| Heat generation | TWh | - | - | - | - | 15.3 | 25.6 | 26.0 | 25.4 | 24.8 | 24.2 | 26.4 |
| Fortum's own power generation by source, total in the Nordic area | ||||||||||||
| Hydro and wind | ||||||||||||
| power | TWh | 19.1 | 21.2 | 19.8 | 20.0 | 22.9 | 22.1 | 22.0 | 21.0 | 25.2 | 18.1 | 22.4 |
| Nuclear power | TWh | 25.8 | 25.8 | 24.4 | 24.9 | 23.7 | 21.4 | 22.0 | 24.9 | 23.4 | 23.7 | 23.8 |
| Thermal power | TWh | 9.5 | 4.2 | 9.0 | 6.2 | 5.0 | 4.6 | 8.3 | 7.2 | 3.0 | 3.4 | 1.8 |
| Total | TWh | 54.4 | 51.2 | 53.2 | 51.1 | 51.6 | 48.1 | 52.3 | 53.1 | 51.6 | 45.2 | 48.0 |
| Fortum's own power generation by source, total in the Nordic area | ||||||||||||
| Hydro and wind | ||||||||||||
| power | % | 35 | 42 | 37 | 39 | 44 | 46 | 42 | 40 | 49 | 40 | 46 |
| Nuclear power | % | 47 | 50 | 46 | 49 | 46 | 44 | 42 | 47 | 45 | 52 | 50 |
| Thermal power | % | 18 | 8 | 17 | 12 | 10 | 10 | 16 | 13 | 6 | 8 | 4 |
| Total | % | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 |
| Power generation capacity by segment | ||||||||||||
| Power | MW | 10,003 | 9,540 | 9,560 | 9,575 | 9,709 | 9,728 | 9,752 | 9,702 | 9,475 | 9,063 | |
| Heat | MW | 1,278 | 1,373 | 1,360 | 1,213 | 1,446 | 1,600 | 1,670 | 1,569 | |||
| Heat, Electricity | ||||||||||||
| Sales and | ||||||||||||
| Solutions | MW | 793 | 803 | |||||||||
| Russia | MW | - | - | - | 2,785 | 2,785 | 2,785 | 3,404 | 3,404 | 4,250 | 4,758 | |
| Total | MW | 11,281 | 10,913 | 10,920 | 13,573 | 13,940 | 14,113 | 14,826 | 14,675 | 14,518 | 14,624 | |
| Heat production capacity by segment | ||||||||||||
| Power | MW | 250 | 250 | 250 | 250 | 250 | 250 | 250 | 250 | 250 | 0 | |
| Heat | MW | 9,757 | 10,633 | 10,973 | 10,218 | 10,284 | 10,448 | 10,375 | 8,785 | |||
| Heat, Electricity | ||||||||||||
| Sales and | ||||||||||||
| Solutions | MW | 4,317 | 3,936 | |||||||||
| Russia | MW | - | - | - | 13,796 | 13,796 | 13,796 | 14,107 | 13,396 | 13,466 | 13,466 | |
| Total | MW | 10,007 | 10,883 | 11,223 | 24,264 | 24,330 | 24,494 | 24,732 | 22,431 | 18,033 | 17,402 | |
| Fortum's total power and heat sales in EU and Norway | ||||||||||||
| Electricity sales | EUR million | 2,017 | 2,002 | 2,437 | 2,370 | 2,959 | 2,802 | 3,110 | 2,868 | 2,700 | 2,462 | 2,299 |
| Heat sales | EUR million | 809 | 867 | 1,014 | 1,096 | 1,157 | 1,095 | 1,309 | 1,278 | 1,201 | 538 | 468 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fortum's total power and heat sales in Russia | ||||||||||||
| Electricity sales | EUR million | - | - | - | - | 332 | 390 | 505 | 590 | 713 | 822 | 758 |
| Heat sales | EUR million | - | - | - | - | 141 | 219 | 287 | 324 | 300 | 290 | 285 |
| Fortum's total power sales by area | ||||||||||||
| Finland | TWh | 31.1 | 26.0 | 29.6 | 29.0 | 28.7 | 26.1 | 30.7 | 24.6 | 21.6 | 23.4 | 21.6 |
| Sweden | TWh | 27.6 | 30.4 | 28.5 | 27.6 | 28.5 | 26.9 | 28.3 | 29.4 | 30.1 | 23.3 | 28.2 |
| Russia | TWh | - | - | - | - | 14.8 | 19.5 | 18.7 | 20.2 | 23.3 | 25.6 | 26.5 |
| Other countries | TWh | 3.6 | 3.3 | 3.5 | 3.1 | 3.0 | 3.2 | 3.2 | 3.6 | 3.8 | 4.3 | 3.8 |
| Total | TWh | 62.3 | 59.7 | 61.6 | 59.7 | 75.0 | 75.7 | 80.9 | 77.8 | 78.8 | 76.6 | 80.1 |
| Fortum's total heat sales by area | ||||||||||||
| Finland | TWh | 10.5 | 9.8 | 10.7 | 11.1 | 10.8 | 8.0 | 9.6 | 8.5 | 5.8 | 5.5 | 3.2 |
| Russia | TWh | - | - | - | - | 15.3 | 25.6 | 26.8 | 26.7 | 26.4 | 24.1 | 26.0 |
| Sweden | TWh | 9.6 | 9.5 | 9.3 | 9.2 | 9.1 | 9.8 | 10.9 | 8.5 | 8.5 | - | - |
| Poland | TWh | 0.4 | 1.1 | 3.6 | 3.5 | 3.6 | 3.7 | 4.0 | 4.3 | 4.3 | 4.1 | 3.4 |
| Other countries | TWh | 3.3 | 3.4 | 3.2 | 3.3 | 3.4 | 3.5 | 3.6 | 3.4 | 2.9 | 3.1 | 2.8 |
| Total | TWh | 23.8 | 23.8 | 26.8 | 27.1 | 42.2 | 50.6 | 54.9 | 51.4 | 47.9 | 36.8 | 35.4 |
| Volume of distributed electricity in distribution networks | ||||||||||||
| Finland | TWh | 6.2 | 6.3 | 7.7 | 9.2 | 9.3 | 9.4 | 10.0 | 9.5 | 9.8 | 9.5 | 2.8 |
| Sweden | TWh | 14.2 | 14.4 | 14.4 | 14.3 | 14.0 | 14.0 | 15.2 | 14.2 | 14.4 | 14.1 | 13.7 |
| Norway | TWh | 2.1 | 2.2 | 2.3 | 2.3 | 2.3 | 2.3 | 2.5 | 2.3 | 2.4 | 2.5 | 1.1 |
| Estonia | TWh | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.1 | 0.0 | - | - |
| Total | TWh | 22.7 | 23.1 | 24.6 | 26.0 | 25.8 | 25.9 | 27.9 | 26.1 | 26.6 | 26.1 | 17.6 |
From 2005, Fortum applies International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) for the annual and interim reports. The 2005 annual report included one comparison year 2004, which was restated to IFRS. Segment numbers are presented based only on IFRS for comparison purposes, because in the transition to IFRS reportable segments were redefined and segment reporting as such was reassessed.
Following the acquisition of the Russian company, OAO Fortum, Fortum changed its segment reporting during 2008. Comparison numbers for 2004-2007 were restated in 2008.
Fortum renewed its business structure as of 1 March 2014. The reorganisation lead to a change in Fortum's external financial reporting structure as previously separately reported segments Heat and Electricity Sales are now combined into one segment: Heat, Electricity Sales and Solutions.
Fortum has applied new IFRS 10 Consolidated financial statements and IFRS 11 Joint arrangements from 1 January 2014. The effect of applying the new standards to Fortum Group financial information relates to AB Fortum Värme samägt med Stockholm Stad (Fortum Värme), that is treated as a joint venture and thus consolidated with equity method from 1 January 2014 onwards. Before the change the company was consolidated as a subsidiary with 50% minority interest.
Information for 2013 has been restated to reflect both the change in business structure and adoption of new IFRS standards.
| Sales by segment, | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EUR million | 2004 | 2005 | 2006 | 2007 | 2008 | 2009 | 2010 | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | 2014 |
| Power and Technology | 2,084 | 2,058 | 2,439 | 2,350 | 2,892 | 2,531 | 2,702 | 2,481 | 2,415 | 2,252 | 2,156 |
| - of which internal | 128 | -97 | -133 | 323 | 0 | 254 | -281 | -24 | 296 | 69 | 85 |
| Heat | 1,025 | 1,063 | 1,268 | 1,356 | 1,466 | 1,399 | 1,770 | 1,737 | 1,628 | ||
| - of which internal | 49 | -12 | -32 | 38 | 0 | 23 | -8 | 8 | 18 | ||
| Heat, Electricity Sales and Solutions | 1,516 | 1,332 | |||||||||
| - of which internal | 87 | 34 | |||||||||
| Russia | 489 | 632 | 804 | 920 | 1,030 | 1,119 | 1,055 | ||||
| - of which internal | - | - | - | - | - | - | 0 | ||||
| Distribution | 707 | 707 | 753 | 769 | 789 | 800 | 963 | 973 | 1,070 | 1,064 | 751 |
| - of which internal | 10 | -8 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 13 | 18 | 15 | 37 | 19 | 17 |
| Electricity Sales | 1,387 | 1,365 | 1,912 | 1,683 | 1,922 | 1,449 | 1,798 | 900 | 722 | ||
| - of which internal | 92 | -101 | 149 | 155 | 177 | 67 | 158 | 95 | 55 | ||
| Other | 90 | 91 | 78 | 81 | 83 | 71 | 51 | 108 | 137 | 63 | 58 |
| - of which internal | 93 | -63 | 62 | 72 | 82 | -5 | 169 | 115 | -66 | 54 | 44 |
| Eliminations | -1,458 | -1,407 | -1,959 | -1,760 | -2,005 | -1,447 | -1,792 | -958 | -843 | -706 | -601 |
| Total | 3,835 | 3,877 | 4,491 | 4,479 | 5,636 | 5,435 | 6,296 | 6,161 | 6,159 | 5,309 | 4,751 |
| Comparable operating profit by | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| segment, EUR million |
2004 | 2005 | 2006 | 2007 | 2008 | 2009 | 2010 | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | 2014 |
| Power and Technology | 730 | 854 | 985 | 1,095 | 1,528 | 1,454 | 1,298 | 1,201 | 1,146 | 859 | 877 |
| Heat | 207 | 253 | 253 | 290 | 250 | 231 | 275 | 278 | 271 | ||
| Heat, Electricity Sales and Solutions | 109 | 104 | |||||||||
| Russia | -92 | -20 | 8 | 74 | 68 | 156 | 161 | ||||
| Distribution | 240 | 244 | 250 | 231 | 248 | 262 | 307 | 295 | 320 | 332 | 266 |
| Electricity Sales | 23 | 30 | -4 | -1 | -33 | 22 | 11 | 27 | 39 | ||
| Other | -52 | -47 | -47 | -51 | -56 | -61 | -66 | -73 | -92 | -54 | -57 |
| Comparable operating profit | 1,148 | 1,334 | 1,437 | 1,564 | 1,845 | 1,888 | 1,833 | 1,802 | 1,752 | 1,403 | 1,351 |
| Non-recurring items | 18 | 30 | 61 | 250 | 85 | 29 | 93 | 284 | 155 | 61 | 2,171 |
| Other items affecting comparability | 29 | -17 | -43 | 33 | 33 | -135 | -218 | 316 | -33 | 45 | -94 |
| Operating profit | 1,195 | 1,347 | 1,455 | 1,847 | 1,963 | 1,782 | 1,708 | 2,402 | 1,874 | 1,508 | 3,428 |
| Comparable EBITDA by segment, EUR million |
2004 | 2005 | 2006 | 2007 | 2008 | 2009 | 2010 | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | 2014 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power and Technology | 834 | 966 | 1,093 | 1,198 | 1,625 | 1,547 | 1,398 | 1,310 | 1,260 | 1,007 | 998 |
| Heat | 331 | 376 | 397 | 453 | 419 | 393 | 462 | 471 | 481 | ||
| Heat, Electricity Sales and Solutions | 211 | 204 | |||||||||
| Russia | -25 | 55 | 94 | 148 | 189 | 258 | 304 | ||||
| Distribution | 373 | 389 | 397 | 393 | 413 | 426 | 485 | 482 | 529 | 548 | 416 |
| Electricity Sales | 39 | 45 | 15 | 10 | -26 | 28 | 13 | 29 | 40 | ||
| Other | -41 | -35 | -36 | -39 | -46 | -51 | -56 | -66 | -83 | -49 | -49 |
| Total | 1,536 | 1,741 | 1,866 | 2,015 | 2,360 | 2,398 | 2,396 | 2,374 | 2,416 | 1,975 | 1,873 |
| Depreciation, amortisation and impairment charges by segment, |
|||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EUR million | 2004 | 2005 | 2006 | 2007 | 2008 | 2009 | 2010 | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | 2014 |
| Power and Technology | 104 | 112 | 108 | 103 | 97 | 93 | 100 | 109 | 114 | 148 | 121 |
| Heat | 124 | 123 | 144 | 163 | 169 | 162 | 187 | 193 | 210 | ||
| Heat, Electricity Sales and Solutions | 102 | 100 | |||||||||
| Russia | 67 | 75 | 86 | 108 | 121 | 150 | 147 | ||||
| Distribution | 133 | 145 | 147 | 162 | 165 | 164 | 178 | 187 | 209 | 216 | 150 |
| Electricity Sales | 16 | 15 | 19 | 11 | 7 | 6 | 2 | 2 | 1 | ||
| Other | 11 | 12 | 11 | 12 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 7 | 9 | 5 | 8 |
| Total | 388 | 407 | 429 | 451 | 515 | 510 | 563 | 606 | 664 | 621 | 526 |
| Share of profit of associates and joint ventures by segment, EUR million |
2004 | 2005 | 2006 | 2007 | 2008 | 2009 | 2010 | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | 2014 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power and Technology | -21 | -21 | -9 | -23 | 26 | -35 | -25 | 3 | -12 | 4 | -14 |
| Heat | 15 | 11 | 23 | 24 | 12 | 30 | 31 | 19 | 20 | ||
| Heat, Electricity Sales and Solutions | 91 | 88 | |||||||||
| Russia | 19 | 20 | 8 | 30 | 27 | 46 | 35 | ||||
| Distribution | 16 | 20 | 15 | 18 | 16 | 10 | 19 | 14 | 8 | 4 | 3 |
| Electricity Sales | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | ||
| Other | 2 | 44 | 39 | 222 | 48 | -4 | 28 | 23 | -20 | 32 | 37 |
| Total | 12 | 55 | 69 | 241 | 126 | 21 | 62 | 91 | 23 | 178 | 149 |
| Capital expenditure by segment, EUR million |
2004 | 2005 | 2006 | 2007 | 2008 | 2009 | 2010 | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | 2014 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power and Technology | 84 | 83 | 95 | 93 | 134 | 96 | 97 | 131 | 190 | 179 | 197 |
| Heat | 123 | 124 | 184 | 309 | 408 | 358 | 304 | 297 | 464 | ||
| Heat, Electricity Sales and Solutions | 123 | 86 | |||||||||
| Russia | 256 | 215 | 599 | 670 | 568 | 435 | 340 | ||||
| Distribution | 106 | 115 | 183 | 236 | 296 | 188 | 213 | 289 | 324 | 255 | 147 |
| Electricity Sales | 10 | 10 | 8 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 1 | ||
| Other | 12 | 14 | 15 | 14 | 11 | 4 | 9 | 16 | 11 | 12 | 3 |
| Total | 335 | 346 | 485 | 655 | 1,108 | 862 | 1,222 | 1,408 | 1,558 | 1,005 | 774 |
| Gross investments in shares by segment, |
|||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EUR million | 2004 | 2005 | 2006 | 2007 | 2008 | 2009 | 2010 | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | 2014 |
| Power and Technology | 23 | 45 | 5 | 52 | 0 | 57 | 25 | 17 | - | 2 | 2 |
| Heat | 53 | 87 | 589 | 18 | 23 | 1 | 1 | 32 | 10 | ||
| Heat, Electricity Sales and Solutions | 11 | 37 | |||||||||
| Russia | 103 | 2 | 140 | 245 | 1,492 | 3 | - | 24 | - | 0 | 27 |
| Distribution | 0 | - | 130 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 0 | - | - | 0 | 0 |
| Electricity Sales | 0 | - | 6 | 0 | 0 | - | - | - | - | ||
| Other | 0 | - | 40 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 6 | 2 | 4 |
| Total | 179 | 134 | 910 | 317 | 1,516 | 67 | 27 | 74 | 16 | 15 | 69 |
| Gross divestments of shares by segment, |
||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EUR million | 2009 | 2010 | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | 2014 |
| Power and Technology | 10 | 0 | 3 | 102 | 79 | 67 |
| Heat | 1 | 52 | 203 | 269 | ||
| Heat, Electricity Sales and Solutions | 11 | 446 | ||||
| Russia | - | 43 | 23 | - | - | 0 |
| Distribution | 1 | 46 | 323 | 37 | 52 | 2,681 |
| Electricity Sales | - | - | 16 | 2 | ||
| Other | 2 | 6 | 0 | 0 | - | 2 |
| Total | 14 | 147 | 568 | 410 | 142 | 3,196 |
| Net assets by segment, EUR million | 2004 | 2005 | 2006 | 2007 | 2008 | 2009 | 2010 | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | 2014 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power and Technology | 5,804 | 5,493 | 5,690 | 5,599 | 5,331 | 5,494 | 5,806 | 6,247 | 6,389 | 6,355 | 6,001 |
| Heat | 2,440 | 2,551 | 3,407 | 3,507 | 3,468 | 3,787 | 4,182 | 4,191 | 4,286 | ||
| Heat, Electricity Sales and Solutions | 2,295 | 2,112 | |||||||||
| Russia | 151 | 153 | 294 | 456 | 2,205 | 2,260 | 2,817 | 3,273 | 3,848 | 3,846 | 2,597 |
| Distribution | 3,091 | 3,021 | 3,412 | 3,239 | 3,032 | 3,299 | 3,683 | 3,589 | 3,889 | 3,745 | 2,615 |
| Electricity Sales | 194 | 228 | 176 | 247 | 188 | 125 | 210 | 11 | 51 | ||
| Other | 220 | 447 | 835 | 1,237 | 796 | 382 | 29 | 208 | 158 | 295 | 496 |
| Total | 11,900 | 11,893 | 13,814 | 14,285 | 15,020 | 15,347 | 16,727 | 17,519 | 18,621 | 16,537 | 13,820 |
| Return on net assets by segment, % | 2004 | 2005 | 2006 | 2007 | 2008 | 2009 | 2010 | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | 2014 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power and Technology | 12.6 | 14.3 | 17.5 | 19.2 | 29.6 | 24.5 | 19.5 | 24.6 | 18.7 | 14.5 | 13.6 |
| Heat | 9.8 | 11.6 | 9.6 | 9.3 | 8.9 | 7.9 | 8.4 | 9.9 | 8.8 | ||
| Heat, Electricity Sales and Solutions | 9.7 | 19.1 | |||||||||
| Russia | 66.3 | 3.7 | 0.0 | 2.4 | 3.5 | 3.0 | 5.2 | 5.6 | |||
| Distribution | 8.1 | 8.8 | 8.4 | 7.7 | 8.1 | 8.7 | 9.7 | 13.7 | 9.1 | 9.3 | 73.6 |
| Electricity Sales | 25.2 | 17.4 | -1.6 | 6.9 | -14.0 | 28.9 | 38.4 | 4.2 | 152.3 |
| Comparable return on net assets | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| by segment, % | 2004 | 2005 | 2006 | 2007 | 2008 | 2009 | 2010 | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | 2014 |
| Power and Technology | 12.0 | 14.9 | 17.4 | 18.9 | 28.0 | 26.4 | 22.3 | 19.9 | 18.5 | 13.8 | 14.2 |
| Heat | 9.3 | 11.0 | 9.2 | 9.2 | 7.3 | 7.6 | 7.7 | 7.4 | 7.0 | ||
| Heat, Electricity Sales and Solutions | 8.7 | 8.7 | |||||||||
| Russia | 0.0 | -3.8 | 0.0 | 0.7 | 3.5 | 2.7 | 5.2 | 5.6 | |||
| Distribution | 8.3 | 8.6 | 8.3 | 7.6 | 8.2 | 8.6 | 9.3 | 8.6 | 8.8 | 8.8 | 9.3 |
| Electricity Sales | 17.1 | 16.4 | -0.8 | -0.6 | -15.3 | 18.6 | 9.3 | 33.5 | 203.1 |
| Average number of personnel | 2004 | 2005 | 2006 | 2007 | 2008 | 2009 | 2010 | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | 2014 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power and Technology | 4,588 | 4,374 | 4,147 | 3,475 | 3,591 | 2,068 | 1,891 | 1,873 | 1,896 | 1,900 | 1,685 |
| Heat | 1,605 | 2,186 | 2,345 | 2,302 | 2,422 | 2,652 | 2,482 | 2,682 | 2,354 | ||
| Heat, Electricity Sales and Solutions | 2,051 | 1,913 | |||||||||
| Russia | 5,566 | 6,170 | 4,555 | 4,436 | 4,301 | 4,245 | 4,196 | ||||
| Distribution | 995 | 1,008 | 983 | 1,060 | 1,222 | 1,166 | 1,098 | 902 | 873 | 786 | 492 |
| Electricity Sales | 682 | 745 | 825 | 936 | 766 | 629 | 538 | 510 | 515 | ||
| Other | 722 | 626 | 610 | 531 | 510 | 593 | 592 | 607 | 661 | 550 | 536 |
| Total | 8,592 | 8,939 | 8,910 | 8,304 | 14,077 | 13,278 | 11,156 | 11,010 | 10,600 | 9,532 | 8,821 |
| EBITDA (Earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortisation) |
= | Operating profit + Depreciation, amortisation and impairment charges | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Comparable EBITDA | = | EBITDA - items affecting comparability - Net release of CSA provision | |
| Items affecting comparability | = | Non-recurring items + other items affecting comparability | |
| Comparable operating profit | = | Operating profit - non-recurring items - other items affecting comparability | |
| Non-recurring items | = | Mainly capital gains and losses | |
| Other items affecting comparability | = | Includes effects from financial derivatives hedging future cash-flows where hedge accounting is not applied according to IAS 39 and effects from the accounting of Fortum´s part of the Finnish Nuclear Waste Fund where the asset in the balance sheet cannot exceed the related liabilities according to IFRIC interpretation 5. |
|
| Funds from operations (FFO) | = | Net cash from operating activities before change in working capital | |
| Capital expenditure | = | Capitalised investments in property, plant and equipment and intangible assets including maintenance, productivity, growth and investments required by legislation including borrowing costs capitalised during the construction period. Maintenance investments expand the lifetime of an existing asset, maintain usage/ availability and/or maintains reliability. Productivity improves productivity in an existing asset. Growth investments' purpose is to build new assets and/or to increase customer base within existing businesses. Legislation investments are done at a certain point of time due to legal requirements. |
|
| Gross investments in shares | = | Investments in subsidiary shares, shares in associated companies and other shares in available for sale financial assets. Investments in subsidiary shares are net of cash and grossed with interest-bearing liabilities in the acquired company. |
|
| Return on shareholders' equity, % | = | Profit for the year | x 100 |
| Total equity average | |||
| Return on capital employed, % | = | Profit before taxes + interest and other financial expenses | x 100 |
| Capital employed average | |||
| Return on capital employed continuing operations, % |
= | Profit before taxes continuing operations + interest and other financial expenses continuing operations |
x 100 |
| Capital employed continuing operations average | |||
| Return on net assets, % | = | Operating profit + Share of profit (loss) in associated companies and joint ventures | x 100 |
| Net assets average | |||
| Comparable return on net assets, % | = | Comparable operating profit + Share of profit (loss) in associated companies and joint ventures (adjusted for IAS 39 effects and major sales gains or losses) |
x 100 |
| Comparable net assets average | |||
| Capital employed | = | Total assets - non-interest bearing liabilities - deferred tax liabilities - provisions |
| Non-interest bearing assets + interest-bearing assets related to the Nuclear Waste Fund - non-interest bearing liabilities - provisions (non-interest bearing assets and liabilities do not include finance related items, tax and |
|||
|---|---|---|---|
| Net assets | = | deferred tax and assets and liabilities from fair valuations of derivatives where hedge accounting is applied) | |
| Comparable net assets | = | Net assets adjusted for non-interest-bearing assets and liabilities arising from financial derivatives hedging future cash flows where hedge accounting is not applied according to IAS 39 |
|
| Interest-bearing net debt | = | Interest-bearing liabilities - liquid funds | |
| Gearing, % | = | Interest-bearing net debt | x 100 |
| Total equity | |||
| Equity-to-assets ratio, % | = | Total equity including non-controlling interests | x 100 |
| Total assets | |||
| Net debt/EBITDA | = | Interest-bearing net debt | |
| Operating profit + Depreciation, amortisation and impairment charges | |||
| Comparable net debt/EBITDA | = | Interest-bearing net debt | |
| Comparable EBITDA | |||
| Net debt/EBITDA continuing operations |
= | Interest-bearing net debt | |
| Operating profit continuing operations + Depreciation, amortisation and impairment charges continuing operations |
|||
| Comparable net debt/EBITDA continuing operations |
= | Interest-bearing net debt | |
| Comparable EBITDA continuing operations | |||
| Interest coverage | = | Operating profit | |
| Net interest expenses | |||
| Interest coverage including capitalised | |||
| borrowing costs | = | Operating profit | |
| Net interest expenses-capitalised borrowing costs | |||
| Average number of employees | Based on monthly average for the whole period | ||
| Earnings per share (EPS) | = | Profit for the period - non-controlling interests | |
| Average number of shares during the period | |||
| Cash flow per share | = | Net cash from operating activities | |
| Average number of shares during the period | |||
| Equity per share | = | Shareholders' equity | |
| Number of shares at the end of the period | |||
| Payout ratio, % | = | Dividend per share | x 100 |
| Earnings per share | |||
| Payout ratio continuing operations, % | = | Dividend per share continuing operations | x 100 |
| Earnings per share continuing operations |
| Dividend yield, % | = | Dividend per share | x 100 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Share price at the end of the period | |||
| Price/earnings (P/E) ratio | = | Share price at the end of the period | |
| Earnings per share | |||
| Average share price | = | Amount traded in euros during the period | |
| Number of shares traded during the period | |||
| Market capitalisation | = | Number of shares at the end of the period x share price at the end of the period | |
| Trading volumes | = | Number of shares traded during the period in relation to the weighted average number of shares during the period |
| EUR million | Note | 2014 | 2013* |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sales | 5 | 4,751 | 5,309 |
| Other income | 10 | 75 | 93 |
| Materials and services | 11 | -1,939 | -2,270 |
| Employee benefits | 12 | -413 | -460 |
| Depreciation, amortisation and impairment charges | 5, 18, 19 |
-526 | -621 |
| Other expenses | 10 | -596 | -648 |
| Comparable operating profit | 5 | 1,351 | 1,403 |
| Items affecting comparability | 6, 7 |
2,077 | 106 1 |
| Operating profit | 5 | 3,428 | 1,508 |
| Share of profit of associates and joint ventures | 5, 20 |
149 | 178 |
| Interest expense | 13 | -256 | -301 |
| Interest income | 13 | 84 | 75 |
| Fair value gains and losses on financial instruments | 13 | -5 | -16 |
| Other financial expenses - net | 13 | -40 | -47 |
| Finance costs - net | 13 | -217 | -289 |
| Profit before income tax | 3,360 | 1,398 | |
| Income tax expense | 14 | -199 | -186 |
| Profit for the period | 3,161 | 1,212 | |
| Attributable to: | |||
| Owners of the parent | 3,154 | 1,204 | |
| Non-controlling interests | 7 | 8 | |
| 3,161 | 1,212 | ||
| Earnings per share (in EUR per share) | 15 | ||
| Basic | 3.55 | 1.36 | |
| Diluted | 3.55 | 1.36 |
| EUR million | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Comparable operating profit | 1,351 | 1,403 | |
| Non-recurring items (sales gains) | 2,171 | 61 | 1 |
| Changes in fair values of derivatives hedging future cash flow | -91 | 21 | |
| Nuclear fund adjustment | -3 | 23 | |
| Items affecting comparability | 2,077 | 106 | |
| Operating profit | 3,428 | 1,508 |
* Comparative period information for 2013 presented in these financial statements has been restated due to the accounting change for Fortum Värme, see Note 1.6.1.
The components of the Consolidated statement of comprehensive income (OCI) are items of income and expense that are recognised in equity and not recognised in the Consolidated income statement. They
include unrealised items, such as fair value gains and losses on financial instruments hedging future cash flows. These items will be realised in the Consolidated income statement when the underlying hedged item
is recognised. OCI also includes gains and losses on fair valuation on available for sale financial assets, items in comprehensive income in associated companies and translation differences.
| EUR million | 2014 | 2013 |
|---|---|---|
| Profit for the period | 3,161 | 1,212 |
| Other comprehensive income | ||
| Items that may be reclassified to profit or loss in subsequent periods | ||
| Cash flow hedges | ||
| Fair value gains/losses in the period | 17 | 96 1 |
| Transfers to income statement | -70 | -51 |
| Transfers to inventory/fixed assets | -4 | -8 |
| Tax effect | 12 | -6 |
| Net investment hedges | ||
| Fair value gains/losses in the period | 149 | 28 |
| Tax effect | -28 | -7 |
| Exchange differences on translating foreign operations | -1,343 | -478 2 |
| Share of other comprehensive income of associates | -3 | 42 |
| Other changes | -3 | 0 |
| -1,273 | -384 | |
| Items that will not be reclassified to profit or loss in subsequent periods | ||
| Actuarial gains/losses on defined benefit plans | -77 | 44 |
| Actuarial gains/losses on defined benefit plans in associates | -13 | 9 |
| -90 | 53 | |
| Other comprehensive income for the period, net of tax | -1,363 | -331 |
| Total comprehensive income for the year | 1,799 | 882 |
| Total comprehensive income attributable to: | ||
| Owners of the parent | 1,815 | 881 |
| Non-controlling interests | -16 | 1 |
| 1,799 | 882 |
1 Fair valuation of cash flow hedges mainly relates to electricity prices in future cash flows. When electricity price is higher (lower) than the hedging price, the impact on equity is negative (positive).
2 Translation differences from translation of foregin entities, mainly RUB.
| EUR million Note |
31 Dec 2014 | 31 Dec 2013 |
|---|---|---|
| ASSETS | ||
| Non-current assets | ||
| Intangible assets 18 |
276 | 384 |
| Property, plant and equipment 19 |
11,195 | 12,849 |
| Participations in associates and joint ventures 20 |
2,027 | 2,341 |
| Share in State Nuclear Waste Management Fund 30 |
774 | 744 |
| Other non-current assets 21 |
68 | 77 |
| Deferred tax assets 29 |
98 | 126 |
| Derivative financial instruments 3 |
595 | 367 |
| Long-term interest-bearing receivables 22 |
2,041 | 2,598 |
| Total non-current assets | 17,074 | 19,486 |
| Current assets | ||
| Inventories 23 |
256 | 264 |
| Derivative financial instruments 3 |
448 | 307 |
| Trade and other receivables 24 |
830 | 869 |
| Bank deposits | 757 | 0 |
| Cash and cash equivalents | 2,009 | 1,250 |
| Liquid funds 25 |
2,766 | 1,250 |
| Assets held for sale 9 |
0 | 1,173 |
| Total current assets | 4,301 | 3,863 |
| Total assets | 21,375 | 23,348 |
| EQUITY | ||
| Equity attributable to owners of the parent | ||
| Share capital 26 |
3,046 | 3,046 |
| Share premium | 73 | 73 |
| Retained earnings | 7,708 | 6,851 |
| Other equity components | 36 | 54 |
| Total | 10,864 | 10,024 |
| Non-controlling interests 27 |
71 | 101 |
| Total equity | 10,935 | 10,124 |
| LIABILITIES | ||
| Non-current liabilities | ||
| Interest-bearing liabilities 28 |
5,881 | 6,936 |
| Derivative financial instruments 3 |
247 | 181 |
| Deferred tax liabilities 29 |
1,159 | 1,338 |
| Nuclear provisions 30 |
774 | 744 |
| Other provisions 31 |
17 | 94 |
| Pension obligations 32 |
140 | 50 |
| Other non-current liabilities 33 |
154 | 148 |
| Total non-current liabilities | 8,373 | 9,492 |
| Current liabilities | ||
| Interest-bearing liabilities 28 |
1,103 | 2,103 |
| Derivative financial instruments 3 |
76 | 95 |
| Trade and other payables 34 |
888 | 994 |
| Liabilities related to assets held for sale 9 |
0 | 540 |
| Total current liabilities | 2,067 | 3,732 |
| Total liabilities | 10,440 | 13,224 |
| Total equity and liabilities | 21,375 | 23,348 |
| Owners | Non | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Share | Share | Retained | Other equity | of the | controlling | Total | ||||
| capital | premium | earnings Retained |
components | parent | interests | equity | ||||
| earnings | Translation | Cash | Other | OCI items | ||||||
| and other | of foreign | flow | OCI | associated | ||||||
| EUR million Note |
funds | operations | hedges | items | companies | |||||
| Total equity 31 | ||||||||||
| December 2013 | 3,046 | 73 | 7,500 | -649 | 66 | -51 | 38 | 10,024 | 101 | 10,124 |
| Net profit for the period | 3,154 | 3,154 | 7 | 3,161 | ||||||
| Translation differences | -1,319 | -3 | 2 | 0 | -1,320 | -23 | -1,343 | |||
| Other comprehensive income | -3 | -43 | 44 | -17 | -19 | 0 | -19 | |||
| Total comprehensive income | ||||||||||
| for the period | 3,151 | -1,319 | -47 | 46 | -16 | 1,815 | -16 | 1,799 | ||
| Cash dividend 15 |
-977 | -977 | -977 | |||||||
| Dividends to non-controlling | ||||||||||
| interests | 0 | -2 | -2 | |||||||
| Changes due to | ||||||||||
| business | ||||||||||
| combinations 8 |
6 | 6 | -11 | -5 | ||||||
| Other changes | -4 | -4 | -1 | -4 | ||||||
| Total equity 31 December | ||||||||||
| 2014 | 3,046 | 73 | 9,676 | -1,968 | 19 | -5 | 22 | 10,864 | 71 | 10,935 |
| Total equity 31 December | ||||||||||
| 2012, as previously reported |
3,046 | 73 | 7,193 | -173 | 34 | -133 | 0 | 10,040 | 603 | 10,643 |
| Change in accounting policy | ||||||||||
| 1) | ||||||||||
| 2 | 15 | -17 | -1 | -495 | -496 | |||||
| Total equity 1 January 2013 | 3,046 | 73 | 7,193 | -173 | 36 | -118 | -17 | 10,039 | 108 | 10,147 |
| Net profit for the period | 1,204 | 1,204 | 8 | 1,212 | ||||||
| Translation differences | -476 | -1 | 2 | 4 | -471 | -7 | -478 | |||
| Other comprehensive income | 31 | 65 | 51 | 148 | 0 | 148 | ||||
| Total comprehensive income | ||||||||||
| for the period | 1,204 | -476 | 30 | 67 | 55 | 881 | 1 | 882 | ||
| Cash dividend 15 |
-888 | -888 | -888 | |||||||
| Dividends to non-controlling interests |
0 | -3 | -3 | |||||||
| Changes due to | ||||||||||
| business | ||||||||||
| combinations 8 |
1 | 1 | 1 | |||||||
| Other changes | -10 | -10 | -5 | -15 | ||||||
| Total equity 31 December | ||||||||||
| 2013 | 3,046 | 73 | 7,500 | -649 | 66 | -51 | 38 | 10,024 | 101 | 10,124 |
Translation of financial information from subsidiaries in foreign currency is done using average rate for the income statement and end rate for the balance sheet. The exchange rate differences occurring from translation to EUR are booked to equity. Translation differences impacted equity attributable to owners of the parent company with EUR -1,320 million during 2014 (2013: -471). Translation differences are mainly related to RUB. Part of this translation exposure has been hedged and the hedge result, amounting to EUR 149 million, is included in the other OCI items.
For information regarding exchange rates used, see Note 1 Accounting policies.
For information about translation exposure see Note 3.6 Interest rate risk and currency risk.
The impact on equity attributable to owners of the parent from fair valuation of cash flow hedges, EUR -47 million (2013: 30), mainly relates to cash flow hedges hedging electricity price for future transactions. When electricity price is lower/higher than the hedging price, the impact on equity is positive/negative.
1) Comparative period information has been restated due to the accounting change, see Note 1.6.1
| EUR million Note |
2014 | 2013 |
|---|---|---|
| Cash flow from operating activities | ||
| Net profit for the period | 3,161 | 1,212 |
| Adjustments: | ||
| Income tax expenses | 199 | 186 |
| Finance costs - net | 217 | 289 |
| Share of profit of associates and joint ventures | -149 | -178 |
| Depreciation, amortisation and impairment charges | 526 | 620 |
| Operating profit before depreciations (EBITDA) | 3,954 | 2,129 |
| Non-cash flow items and divesting activities | -2,111 | -262 1 |
| Interest received | 99 | 62 |
| Interest paid | -330 | -371 |
| Dividends received | 58 | 74 |
| Realised foreign exchange gains and losses and other financial items | 349 | 47 2 |
| Taxes | -211 | -210 |
| Funds from operations | 1,808 | 1,469 |
| Change in working capital | -46 | 79 |
| Total net cash from operating activities | 1,762 | 1,548 |
| Cash flow from investing activities | ||
| Capital expenditures 5, 18, 19 |
-768 | -1,004 3 |
| Acquisitions of shares | -69 | -15 |
| Proceeds from sales of fixed assets | 26 | 66 |
| Divestments of shares | 3,062 | 122 |
| Proceeds from interest-bearing receivables relating to divestments | 131 | 22 |
| Shareholder loans to associated companies | 425 | -136 |
| Change in other interest-bearing receivables | 8 | 2 |
| Total net cash used in investing activities | 2,816 | -944 |
| Cash flow before financing activities | 4,578 | 604 |
| Cash flow from financing activities | ||
| Proceeds from long-term liabilities | 50 | 781 |
| Payments of long-term liabilities | -1,499 | -636 |
| Change in short-term liabilities | -580 | 438 |
| Dividends paid to the owners of the parent | 15 -977 |
-888 |
| Other financing items | -1 | 22 |
| Total net cash used in financing activities | -3,007 | -284 |
| Total net increase(+)/decrease(-) in liquid funds | 1,571 | 320 |
| Liquid funds at the beginning of the year | 1,265 | 961 |
| Foreign exchange differences in liquid funds | -70 | -17 |
| Liquid funds at the end of the period 1) | 25 2,766 |
1,265 |
1) Including cash balances of EUR 15 million relating to assets held for sale as of 31 December 2013.
1 Non-cash flow items and divesting activities consist mainly of changes in provisions (including nuclear) EUR -29 million (2013: -168), adjustments for unrealised fair value changes of derivatives EUR 88 million (2013: -22) and capital gains EUR -2.171 million (2013: -61). The actual proceeds for divestments are shown under cash flow from investing activities.
2 Realised foreign exchange gains and losses and other financial items include realised foreign exchange gains and losses of EUR 352 million for 2014 (2013: 52) related mainly to financing of Fortum's Swedish and Russian subsidiaries and the fact that the Group's main external financing currency is EUR. The foreign exchange gains and losses arise for rollover of foreign exchange contracts hedging the internal loans as major part of these forwards is entered into with short maturities i.e. less than twelve months.
3 Capital expenditures in cash flow do not include not yet paid investments. Capitalised borrowing costs are included in interest costs paid.
| EUR million | 2014 | 2013 |
|---|---|---|
| Net debt 1 January | 7,793 | 7,757 |
| Foreign exchange rate differences | -81 | -106 |
| EBITDA | 3,954 | 2,129 |
| Paid net financial costs, taxes and adjustments for non-cash and divestment items | -2,147 | -660 |
| Change in working capital | -46 | 79 |
| Capital expenditures | -768 | -1,004 |
| Acquisitions | -69 | -15 |
| Divestments | 3,089 | 188 |
| Proceeds from interest-bearing receivables relating to divestments | 131 | 22 |
| Shareholder loans to associated companies | 425 | -136 |
| Change in other interest-bearing receivables | 8 | 2 |
| Dividends | -977 | -888 |
| Other financing activities | -1 | 22 |
| Net cash flow (- increase in net debt) | 3,600 | -261 |
| Fair value change of bonds and amortised cost valuation | 105 | -119 |
| Net debt 31 December | 4,217 | 7,793 |
| EUR million | 2014 | 2013 |
|---|---|---|
| Change in interest-free receivables, decrease(+)/increase(-) | -82 | 92 |
| Change in inventories, decrease(+)/increase(-) | -13 | 24 |
| Change in interest-free liabilities, decrease(-)/increase(+) | 49 | -37 |
| Total | -46 | 79 |
Negative effect from change in working capital during 2014, EUR -46 million (2013: +79).
| EUR million | Note | 2014 | 2013 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Capital expenditure | 5, | 18, | 19 | 774 | 1,005 |
| Change in not yet paid investments, decrease(+)/increase(-) | 41 | 60 | |||
| Capitalised borrowing costs | -47 | -60 | |||
| Capital expenditure in cash flow | 768 | 1,004 |
Capital expenditure in intangible assets and property, plant and equipment in the balance sheet was EUR 774 million (2013: 1,005). Capital expenditure in cash flow EUR 768 million (2013: 1,004) is presented without not yet paid investments i.e. change in trade payables related to investments EUR 41 million (2013: 60) and capitalised borrowing costs EUR -47 million (2013: -60), which are presented in interest paid.
See also information about the investments by segments and countries in Note 5 Segment reporting
and the investment projects by segment in Note 19.2 Capital expenditure.
Acquisition of shares, net of cash acquired, amounted to EUR 69 million during 2014 (2013: 15).
| EUR million | Note | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Proceeds from sales of subsidiaries, net of cash disposed | 8 | 2,750 | 22 | |
| Proceeds from interest-bearing receivables from sold subsidiaries | 131 | 22 | ||
| Proceeds from sales of associates | 8, | 20 | 311 | 100 |
| Proceeds from available for sale financial assets | 1 | 0 | ||
| Total | 3,193 | 144 |
Gross divestment of shares totalled EUR 3,196 million in 2014 (2013: 142) including interest-bearing debt in sold subsidiaries of EUR 131 million (2013: 22). Proceeds from divestments of shares totalled EUR 3,193 million in 2014 (2013: 144).
Fortum Corporation (the Company) is a Finnish public limited liability company with its domicile in Espoo, Finland. Fortum's shares are traded on Nasdaq Helsinki.
The operations of Fortum Corporation and its subsidiaries (together the Fortum Group) focus on the focus on the Nordic and Baltic countries, Russia and Poland. Fortum's activities cover generation, distribution and sale of electricity and heat, and energyrelated expert services.
These financial statements were approved by the Board of Directors on 3 February 2015.
The consolidated financial statements of the Fortum Group have been prepared in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) and IFRIC Interpretations as adopted by the European Union. The financial statements also comply with Finnish accounting principles and corporate legislation.
The consolidated financial statements have been prepared under the historical cost convention, except for available for sale financial assets, financial assets and financial liabilities (including derivative instruments) at fair value through profit and loss and items hedged at fair value.
In the Consolidated income statement Comparable operating profit-key figure is presented to better reflect the Group's business performance when comparing results for the current period with previous periods.
Items affecting comparability are disclosed as a separate line item. The following items are included in "Items affecting comparability":
• non-recurring items, which mainly consist of capital gains and losses;
• effects from fair valuations of derivatives hedging future cash flows which do not obtain hedge accounting status according to IAS 39. The major part of Fortum's cash flow hedges obtain hedge accounting where fair value changes are recorded in equity;
• effects from accounting of Fortum's part of the State Nuclear Waste Management Fund where the assets can not exceed the related liabilities according to IFRIC5.
Comparable operating profit is used for financial target setting, follow up and allocation of resources in the group's performance management.
An asset or a liability is classified as current when it is expected to be realised in the normal operating cycle or within twelve months after the balance sheet date or it is classified as financial assets or liabilities held at fair value through profit or loss. Liquid funds are classified as current assets.
All other assets and liabilities are classified as non-current assets and liabilities.
The consolidated financial statements comprise of the parent company, subsidiaries, joint ventures and associated companies.
The Fortum Group was formed in 1998 by using the pooling-of-interests method for consolidating Fortum Power and Heat Oy and Fortum Oil and Gas Oy (the latter demerged to Fortum Oil Oy and Fortum Heat and Gas Oy 1 May 2004). In 2005 Fortum Oil Oy was separated from Fortum by distributing 85% of its shares to Fortum's shareholders and by selling the remaining 15%. This means that the acquisition cost of Fortum Power and Heat Oy and Fortum Heat and Gas Oy has been eliminated against the share capital of the companies. The difference has been entered as a decrease in shareholders' equity.
Subsidiaries are defined as companies in which Fortum has control. Control exists when Fortum is exposed to, or has rigths to, variable returns from its involvement with the entity and has the ability to affect those returns through its power over the entity.
The acquisition method of accounting is used to account for the acquisition of subsidiaries. The cost of an acquisition is measured as the aggregate of fair value of the assets given and liabilities incurred or assumed at the date of exchange, plus costs directly attributable to the acquisition. Identifiable assets acquired and liabilities assumed in a business combination are measured initially at their fair values at the acquisition date, irrespective of the extent of any minority interest. The excess of the cost of acquisition over the fair value of the Group's share of the identifiable net assets acquired is recorded as goodwill. If the cost of acquisition is less than the fair value of the net assets of the subsidiary acquired, the difference is recognised directly in the income statement.
Subsidiaries are fully consolidated from the date on which control is transferred to the Group and are no longer consolidated from the date that control ceases.
Intercompany transactions, balances and unrealised gains on transactions between Group companies are eliminated. Unrealised losses are also eliminated unless the transaction provides evidence of an impairment of the asset transferred. Where necessary, subsidiaries' accounting policies have been changed to ensure consistency with the policies the Group has adopted.
The Fortum Group subsidiaries are disclosed in Note 42 Subsidiaries by segment on 31 December 2014.
Associated companies are entities over which the Group has significant influence but not control, generally accompanying a
shareholding of between 20% and 50% of the voting rights. The Group's interests in associated companies are accounted for using the equity method of accounting.
Joint ventures are arrangement in which the Group has joint control. Joint ventures are accounted for using the equity method of accounting.
Non-controlling interests in subsidiaries are identified separately from the equity of the owners of the parent company. The noncontrolling interests are initially measured at the non-controlling interests' proportionate share of the fair value of the acquiree's identifiable net assets. Subsequent to acquisition, the carrying amount of noncontrolling interests is the amount of those interests at initial recognition plus the noncontrolling interests' share of subsequent changes in equity.
Items included in the financial statements of each of the Group's entities are measured using the currency of the primary economic environment in which the entity operates ('the functional currency'). The consolidated financial statements are presented in euros, which is the Company's functional and presentation currency.
Transactions denominated in foreign currencies are translated using the exchange rate at the date of the transaction. Receivables and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies outstanding on the closing date are translated using the exchange rate quoted on the closing date. Exchange rate differences have been entered in the income statement. Net conversion differences relating to financing are entered under financial income or expenses, except when deferred in equity as qualifying cash flow hedges. Translation differences on available for sale financial assets are included in Other equity components section of the equity.
The income statements of subsidiaries, whose measurement and reporting currencies are not euros, are translated into the Group reporting currency using the average exchange rates for the year based on the month-end exchange rates, whereas the balance sheets of such subsidiaries are translated using the exchange rates on the balance sheet date. On consolidation, exchange differences arising from the translation of the net investment in foreign entities, and of borrowings and other currency instruments designated as hedges of such investments, are taken to equity. When a foreign operation is sold, such exchange differences are recognised in the income statement as part of the gain or loss on sale. Goodwill and fair value adjustments arising on the acquisition of a foreign entity are treated as assets and liabilities of the foreign entity and translated at the closing rate.
The balance sheet date rate is based on the exchange rate published by the European Central Bank for the closing date. The average exchange rate is calculated as an average of each month's ending rate from the European Central Bank during the year and the ending rate of the previous year.
| Average rate | Balance sheet date rate | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Currency | 2014 | 2013 | 31 Dec 2014 | 31 Dec 2013 | |
| Sweden | SEK | 9.1004 | 8.6624 | 9.3930 | 8.8591 |
| Norway | NOK | 8.3940 | 7.8266 | 9.0420 | 8.3630 |
| Poland | PLN | 4.1909 | 4.2027 | 4.2732 | 4.1543 |
| Russia | RUB | 51.4243 | 42.4441 | 72.3370 | 45.3246 |
The Group's interests in associated companies and jointly ventures are accounted for by the equity method. Associates and joint ventures, whose measurement and reporting currencies are not euro, are translated into the Group
reporting currency using the same principles as for subsidiaries, see 1.4.3 Group companies.
Fortum describes the accounting principles in conjunction with the relevant note information. The table below lists the
significant accounting policies and the note where they are presented as well as the relevant IFRS standard.
| Accounting principle | Note | IFRS-standard |
|---|---|---|
| Segment reporting | 5. Segment reporting | IFRS 8 |
| Revenue recognition | 5. Segment reporting and 24. Trade and other receivables | IAS 18 |
| Government grants | 19. Property, plant and equipment | IAS 20 |
| Share-based payments | 12. Employee benefits | IFRS 2 |
| Income taxes | 29. Deferred income taxes | IAS 12 |
| Non-current assets held for sale and | ||
| discontinued operations | 9. Assets held for sale | IFRS 5 |
| 20. Participations in associated | ||
| Joint arrangements | companies and joint ventures | IFRS 11, IAS 28, IFRS 12 |
| 20. Participations in associated | ||
| Investments in associates | companies and joint ventures | IAS 28, IFRS 12 |
| Other shares and participations | 16. Financial assets and liabilities by categories | IAS 32, IAS 36, IAS 39 |
| Intangible assets | 18. Intangible assets | IAS 38 |
| Tangible assets | 19. Property, plant and equipment | IAS 16, IAS 36, IAS 40 |
| Leasing | 36. Leasing | IAS 17 |
| Inventories | 23. Inventories | IAS 2 |
| Earnings per share | 15. Earnings and dividend per share | IAS 33 |
| Pensions and similar obligations | 32. Pension obligations | IAS 19 |
| Decommissioning obligation | 30. Nuclear related assets and liabilities | IFRIC 5 |
| Provisions | 31. Other provisions | IAS 37 |
| Contingent liabilities | 38. Contingent liabilities | IAS 37 |
| 16. Financial assets and liabilities by categories and | ||
| Financial instruments | 17. Financial assets and liabilities by fair value hierarchy | IAS 32, IAS 39, IFRS 7 |
| Liquid funds | 25. Liquid funds | IAS 7 |
| Borrowings | 28. Interest-bearing liabilities | IAS 39 |
Fortum has adopted the following new or amended standards on 1 January 2014:
IFRS 10 Consolidated financial statements The standard builds on existing principles by identifying the concept of control as the determining factor whether an entity should be included within the consolidated financial statements of the parent company. The standard provides additional guidance to assist in the determination of control where this is difficult to assess.
The standard replaces IAS 31 Interests in joint ventures. Joint control under IFRS 11 is defined as the contractual sharing of control of an arrangement, which exists only when
the decisions about the relevant activities require unanimous consent of the parties sharing control.
The standard includes disclosure requirements for all forms of interests in other entities, including joint arrangements, associates, special purpose vehicles and other off balance sheet vehicles.
When adopting the new standards Fortum has reassessed its control conclusions for its investees and re-evaluated its involvement in its partially owned investments. The reassessment has lead reclassification of some entities from an associated company to a joint venture. Notwithstanding the reclassification, these investments will continu to be recognised by applying the equity method and there was no impact on the recognised assets, liabilities and comprehensive income of Fortum.
The accounting effects of applying the new standards to Fortum Group financial information relate to AB Fortum Värme
samägt med Stockholms Stad (Fortum Värme), that is treated as a joint venture and thus consolidated with equity method from 1 January 2014. Fortum Värme is a district heating company producing heat and power with CHP plants in Stockholm area. Before 2014, the company has been consolidated as a subsidiary with 50% minority interest.
In the restated balance sheet shares of Fortum Värme are included in the Shares in associated companies and joint ventures. Fortum Oyj and its subsidiaries have given loans to Fortum Värme which are presented as shareholders loans in the restated balance sheet. There is a plan to refinance those shareholder loans with external financing by the end of 2015.
Restatement did not have any or only limited effect on Fortum's key ratios such as earnings per share, return on capital employed and return on shareholders' equity. The current financing arrangement effects the restated comparable net debt to EBITDA ratio negatively, increase from 3.4 to 3.9 in 2013, due to Fortum's definition of net debt
where interest-bearing receivables are not deducted from net debt. The effect will decrease as Fortum's shareholder loans are replaced with external financing. Comparable net debt to EBITDA ratio would have been 3.4 at the end of 2013, if the interest-bearing receivables from Fortum Värme were deducted from net debt.
When applying IFRS 10 and 11 in 2014, the standards require the comparative information to be restated. Therefore the comparative period information for 2013 presented in the consolidated financial statement for 2014 has been restated. Full set of restated quarterly information for 2013 was presented in the Q1/2014 interim report.
In the following tables Fortum's income statement, balances sheet and certain key figures are presented before and after restatement.
| Fortum | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Fortum | group | ||
| Group | restated | ||
| with | Värme | ||
| Värme as | as joint | ||
| EUR million | subsidiary | venture | Change |
| Sales | 6,056 | 5,309 | -747 |
| Other income | 94 | 93 | -1 |
| Materials and services | -2,533 | -2,270 | 263 |
| Employee benefit costs | -529 | -460 | 69 |
| Other expenses | -740 | -621 | 119 |
| Depreciation, amortisation and impairment charges | -741 | -648 | 93 |
| Comparable operating profit | 1,607 | 1,403 | -204 |
| Items affecting comparability | 105 | 105 | 0 |
| Operating profit | 1,712 | 1,508 | -204 |
| Share of profits in associates and joint ventures | 105 | 178 | 73 |
| Finance costs - net | -318 | -289 | 29 |
| Profit before income taxes | 1,499 | 1,397 | -102 |
| Income taxes | -220 | -185 | 35 |
| Profit for the period | 1,279 | 1,212 | -67 |
| Non-controlling interests | -75 | -8 | 67 |
| Net profit for the period, owners of the parent | 1,204 | 1,204 | 0 |
| Earnings per share, EUR | 1.36 | 1.36 | 0 |
| Fortum | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Fortum | group | ||
| Group | restated | ||
| with | Värme | ||
| EUR million | Värme as subsidiary |
as joint venture |
Change |
| ASSETS | |||
| Intangible assets | 392 | 384 | -8 |
| Property, plant and equipement | 15,201 | 12,849 | -2,352 |
| Shares in associated companies and joint ventures | 1,905 | 2,341 | 436 |
| Long-term interest-bearing receivables | 1,463 | 2,597 | 1,134 |
| Other non-current assets | 1,312 | 1,314 | 2 |
| Total non-current assets | 20,273 | 19,485 | -788 |
| Inventories, total | 375 | 263 | -112 |
| Trade and other receivables 1) | 2,518 | 2,350 | -168 |
| Liquid funds | 1,254 | 1,250 | -4 |
| Total current assets | 4,147 | 3,863 | -284 |
| Total assets | 24,420 | 23,348 | -1,072 |
| EQUITY AND LIABILITIES | |||
| Share capital | 3,046 | 3,046 | 0 |
| Other equity | 6,978 | 6,978 | 0 |
| Total | 10,024 | 10,024 | 0 |
| Non-controlling interests | 638 | 100 | -538 |
| Total equity | 10,662 | 10,124 | -538 |
| Interest-bearing liabilities | 9,098 | 9,039 | -59 |
| Deferred tax liabilities | 1,648 | 1,338 | -310 |
| Other interest-free liabilities 2) | 3,012 | 2,847 | -165 |
| Total liabilities | 13,758 | 13,224 | -534 |
| Total liabilities and equity | 24,420 | 23,348 | -1,072 |
1) Include assets held for sale EUR 1,173 million.
2) Include liabilities related to assets held for sale EUR 540 million.
| Fortum Group |
Fortum group restated |
||
|---|---|---|---|
| with Värme as |
Värme as joint |
||
| EUR million | subsidiary | venture | Change |
| Comparable EBITDA, EUR million | 2,299 | 1,976 | -323 |
| Earnings per share (basic), EUR | 1.36 | 1.36 | 0 |
| Capital expenditure, EUR million | 1,284 | 1,004 | -280 |
| Capital employed, EUR million | 19,780 | 19,183 | -597 |
| Interest-bearing net debt, EUR million | 7,849 | 7,794 | -55 |
| Interest-bearing net debt without Värme financing, EUR | |||
| million | 7,849 | 6,660 | -1,189 |
| Return on capital employed, % | 9.2 | 9.0 | -0.2 |
| Return on shareholders' equity, % | 12.0 | 12.0 | 0.0 |
| Comparable net debt/EBITDA | 3.4 | 3.9 | 0.5 |
| Comparable net debt/EBITDA without Värme financing | 3.4 | 3.4 | 0.0 |
Fortum has also applied the annual improvements to IFRSs issued in December 2013 from 1 January 2014 onwards. The improvements primarily remove inconsistencies and clarified wording of standards. Amendments did not have an impact on Fortum's financial statements.
Fortum will apply the following new or amended standards and interpretations starting from 1 January 2016 or later:
IFRIC 21 Levies (effective for annual periods beginning on or after 1 January 2014). The interpretation has guidance on when to recognise a liability to pay a levy. Fortum will apply the new standard from 1 January 2015 onwards. The interpretation will not have a material impact on Fortum's financial statements.
IFRS 9 Financial instruments (effective for annual periods beginning on or after 1 January 2018). The standard has new requirements for the classification and measurement of financial assets and liabilities and hedge accounting and it will replace IAS 39 and IFRS 7. Fortum will apply the new standard from beginning of 2018. The Standard is still subject to endorsement by EU.
IFRS 15 Revenue from contracts with Customers (effective for annual periods beginning on or after 1 January 2017). The standard focuses on revenue recognition models and will replace IAS 11 and IAS 18. Fortum will apply the new standard from beginning of 2017. The Standard is still subject to endorsement by EU.
Annual Improvements to IFRSs 2012–2014 Cycle issued in September 2014 (effective for annual periods beginning on or after 1 January 2016). The improvements primarily remove inconsistencies and clarify wording of standards. There are separate transitional provisions for each standard. Amendments are not expected to have an impact on Fortum's financial statements. The improvements are still subject to endorsement by EU.
Fortum discloses segment information in a manner consistent with internal reporting to Fortum's Board of Directors and to Fortum Executive Management Team led by the President and CEO. Fortum has segments based on type of business operations, combined with one segment based on geographical area.
The Group's businesses are divided into the following reporting segments: Power and Technology, Heat, Electricity Sales and Solutions, Russia and Distribution.
Revenue comprises the fair value consideration received or receivable at the time of delivery of products and/or upon fulfilment of services. Revenue is shown net of rebates, discounts, value-added tax and selective taxes such as electricity tax. Revenue is recognised as follows:
Sale of electricity, heat, cooling and distribution of electricity is recognised at the time of delivery. The sale to industrial and commercial customers and to end-customers is recognised based on the value of the volume supplied, including an estimated value of the volume supplied to customers between the date of their last meter reading and yearend.
Physical energy sales and purchase contracts are accounted for on accrual basis as they are contracted with the Group's expected purchase, sale or usage requirements.
Electricity tax is levied on electricity delivered to retail customers by domestic utilities in Sweden. The tax is calculated on the basis of a fixed tax rate per kWh. The rate varies between different classes of customers. Sale of electricity in the income statement is shown net of electricity tax.
Physical electricity sales and purchases are done through Nord Pool Spot. The sales and purchases are netted on Group level on an hourly basis and posted either as revenue or cost, according to whether Fortum is a net
seller or a net buyer during any particular hour.
The prices charged of customers for the sale of distribution of electricity are regulated. The regulatory mechanism differs from country to country. Any over or under income decided by the regulatory body is regarded as regulatory assets or liabilities that do not qualify for balance sheet recognition due to the fact that no contract defining the regulatory aspect has been entered into with a specific customer and thus the receivable is contingent on future delivery. The over or under income is normally credited or charged over a number of years in the future to the customer using the electricity connection at that time. No retroactive credit or charge can be made.
Fees paid by the customer when connected to the electricity, gas, heat or cooling network are recognised as income to the extent that the fee does not cover future commitments. If the connection fee is linked to the contractual agreement with the customer, the income is recognised over the period of the agreement with the customer.
Fees paid by the customer when connected to district heating network in Finland are refundable. These connection fees have not been recognised in the income statement and are included in other liabilities in the balance sheet.
Contract revenue is recognised under the percentage of completion method to determine the appropriate amount to recognise as revenue and expenses in a given period. The stage of completion is measured by reference to the contract costs incurred up to the closing date as a percentage of total estimated costs for each contract. Costs incurred in the year in connection with future activity on a contract are excluded from contract costs in determining the stage of completion. They are presented as inventories, prepayments or other assets, depending on their nature.
The Group presents as an asset the amount due from customers for contract work for all contracts in progress for which costs incurred plus recognised profits (less recognised losses) exceed progress billings. Progress billings not yet paid by customers and retention are included within 'trade and other receivables'. The Group presents as a liability the amount due to customers for contract work for all contracts in progress for which progress billings exceed costs incurred plus recognised profits (less recognised losses).
Non-current assets (or disposal groups) classified as held for sale are valued at the lower of their carrying amount and fair value less costs to sell if their carrying amount will be recovered principally through a sale transaction rather than through continuing use. These classification criteria do not include non-current assets to be abandoned or those that have been temporarily taken out of use. An impairment loss (or subsequent gain) reduces (or increases) the carrying amount of the non-current assets or disposal groups. The assets are not depreciated or amortised. Interest or other expenses related to these assets are recognised as before the classification as held for sale.
Discontinued operations represent a separate major line of business that either has been disposed of or is classified as held for sale. Assets and liabilities attributable to the discontinued operations must be clearly distinguishable from the other consolidated entities in terms of their operations and cash flows. In addition, the reporting entity must not have any significant continuing involvement in the operations classified as a discontinued operation.
See Note 9. Assets held for sale
Revenue from activities outside normal operations is reported in other income. This includes recurring items such as rental income and non-recurring items such as insurance compensation.
The Group accounts for emission allowances based on currently valid IFRS standards where purchased emission allowances are accounted for as intangible assets at cost, whereas emission allowances received free of charge are accounted for at nominal value. A provision is recognised to cover the obligation to return emission allowances. To the extent that Group already holds allowances to meet the obligation the provision is measured at the carrying amount of those allowances. Any shortfall of allowances held over the obligation is valued at the current market value of allowances.
The cost of the provision is recognised in the income statement within materials and services. Gains/losses from sales of emission rights are reported in other income.
Research and development costs are recognised as expense as incurred and included in other expenses in the income statement. If development costs will generate future income, they are capitalised as intangible assets and depreciated over the period of the income streams.
Fortum's share bonus system is a performance-based, long-term incentive (LTI) arrangement. A new plan commences annually if the Board of Directors so decides. The potential reward is based on the performance of the Group and its divisions.
In the LTI arrangement each share plan begins with a three-year earning period during which participants may earn share rights if the earnings criteria set by the Board of Directors are fulfilled. The value of the share participation is defined after the threeyear earning period when the participants are paid the earned rights in the form of shares. After the earning period, income tax and statutory employment related expenses are deducted from the reward and the net reward is used to acquire Fortum shares in the name of the participant. The maximum value of shares, before taxation, to be delivered to a participant after the earning period cannot exceed the participant's annual salary.
The earning period is followed by a three-year lock-up period. During the lock-up period the shares may not be sold, transferred, pledged or disposed in any other way. Dividends and other financial returns paid on the shares during the lock-up period are, however, not subject to restrictions. From plan 2013-2018 onwards the lock-up period may be shortened to one year for the Fortum Executive Management Team members on individual basis if the value of the aggregate ownership of Fortum shares corresponds to a minimum of annual base salary. For other participants the lock-up period is changed into one year from plan 2013-2018 onwards. The shares are released from the lock-up after publishing of the Company's financial results for the last calendar year of the lockup period, provided that the participant remains employed by the Group.
The share plans under the new LTI arrangement are accounted for as partly cash- and partly equity-settled arrangements. The portion of the earned reward that the participants receive in shares is accounted for as an equity settled transaction, and the portion of the earned reward settled in cash covering the tax and other charges, is accounted for as cash settled transaction. For participants receiving cash only, the total arrangement is accounted for as cash-settled transaction. The reward is recognised as an expense during the vesting period with a corresponding increase in the liabilities and for the transactions settled in shares in the equity. The social charges related to the arrangement payable by the employer are accrued as a liability.
See Note 12. Employee benefits
Basic earnings per share is calculated by dividing the net profit attributable to the owners of the parent company by the weighted average number of ordinary shares in issue during the year, excluding ordinary shares purchased by the Group and held as treasury shares.
Diluted earnings per share is calculated adjusting the weighted average number of ordinary shares outstanding to assume conversion of all dilutive potential ordinary shares. For the warrants and stock options a calculation is done to determine the number of shares that could have been acquired at fair value (determined as the average annual market share price of the Fortum share) based on the monetary value of the subscription rights attached to outstanding stock options.
The number of shares calculated as above is deducted from the number of shares that would have been issued assuming the exercise of the stock options. The incremental shares obtained through the assumed exercise of the options and warrants are added to the weighted average number of shares outstanding.
Options and warrants have a dilutive effect only when the average market price of ordinary shares during the period exceeds the exercise price of the options or warrants. Previously reported earnings per share are not retroactively adjusted to reflect changes in price of ordinary shares.
Dividends proposed by the Board of Directors are not recognised in the financial statements until they have been approved by the Company's shareholders at the Annual General Meeting.
See Note 15. Earnings and dividend per share
The Group classifies its investments in the following categories: financial assets at fair value through profit or loss, loans and receivables and available for sale financial assets. The classification depends on the purpose for which the investments were acquired. Management determines the classification of its financial assets at initial recognition and re-evaluates this designation at every reporting date.
A financial asset is classified in this category if acquired principally for the purpose of selling in the short term. Derivatives are also categorised as held for trading unless they are designated as hedges. Assets in this category are classified as current assets if they are either held for trading or are expected to be realised within 12 months of the closing date.
Loans and receivables are non-derivative financial assets with fixed or determinable payments that are not quoted in an active market. They arise when the Group provides money, goods or services directly to a debtor. They are included in non-current assets, except for maturities under 12 months after the closing date. These are classified as current assets.
Available for sale financial assets are nonderivatives that are either designated in this category or not classified in any of the other categories. They are included in non-current assets unless there is an intention to dispose of the investment within 12 months of the closing date.
Purchases and sales of investments are recognised on the trade-date – the date on which the Group commits to purchase or sell the asset. Investments are initially recognised at fair value plus transaction costs for all financial assets not carried at fair value
through profit or loss. Investments are derecognised when the rights to receive cash flows from the investments have expired or have been transferred and the Group has transferred substantially all risks and rewards of ownership.
Available for sale financial assets and financial assets at fair value through profit or loss are subsequently carried at fair value. Loans are carried at amortised cost using the effective interest method. Gains and losses arising from changes in the fair value of the 'financial assets at fair value through profit or loss' category are included in the income statement in the period in which they arise. Gains and losses arising from changes in the fair value of securities classified as available for sale are recognised in equity. When securities classified as available for sale are sold or impaired, the accumulated fair value adjustments are included in the income statement.
The fair values of quoted investments are based on current bid prices. If the market for a financial asset is not active (and for unlisted securities), the Group establishes fair value by using valuation techniques. These include the use of recent arm's length transactions, reference to other instruments that are substantially the same, discounted cash flow analysis, and option pricing models refined to reflect the issuer's specific circumstances.
The Group assesses at each closing date whether there is objective evidence that a financial asset or a group of financial assets is impaired. If any such evidence exists for available for sale financial assets, the cumulative loss – measured as the difference between the acquisition cost and the current fair value, less any impairment loss on that financial asset previously recognised in profit or loss – is removed from equity and recognised in the income statement.
Within the ordinary course of business the Group routinely enters into sale and purchase transactions for commodities. The majority of these transactions take the form of contracts that were entered into and continue to be held for the purpose of receipt or delivery of the commodity in accordance with the Group's expected sale, purchase or usage requirements. Such contracts are not within the scope of IAS 39. All other net-settled commodity contracts are measured at fair value with gains and losses taken to the income statement.
Derivatives are initially recognised at fair value on the date a derivative contract is entered into and are subsequently remeasured at their fair value. The method of recognising the resulting gain or loss depends on whether the derivative is designated as a hedging instrument, and if so, the nature of the item being hedged. The Group designates certain derivatives as either: (1) hedges of highly probable forecast transactions (cash flow hedges); (2) hedges of the fair value of recognised assets or liabilities or a firm commitment (fair value hedge); or (3) hedges of net investments in foreign operations. The Group documents at the inception of the transaction the relationship between hedging instruments and hedged items, as well as its risk management objective and strategy for undertaking various hedge transactions. The Group also documents its assessment, both at hedge inception and on an ongoing basis, of whether the derivatives that are used in hedging transactions are highly effective in offsetting changes in fair values or cash flows of hedged items. Derivatives are divided into non-current and current based on maturity. Only for those electricity derivatives, which have cash flows in different years, the fair values are split between non-current and current assets or liabilities.
The effective portion of changes in the fair value of derivatives that are designated and qualify as cash flow hedges are recognised in equity. The gain or loss relating to the ineffective portion is recognised immediately in the income statement. Amounts accumulated in equity are recycled in the income statement in the periods when the hedged item will affect profit or loss (for instance when the forecast sale that is hedged takes place). However, when the forecast transaction that is hedged results in the recognition of a non-financial asset (for example, inventory) or a liability, the gains and losses previously deferred in equity are transferred from equity and included in the initial measurement of the cost of the asset or liability. When a hedge no longer meets the criteria for hedge accounting, any cumulative gain or loss existing in equity is recognised in the income statement when the forecast transaction is ultimately also recognised in the income statement. When a forecast transaction is no longer expected to occur, the cumulative gain or loss that was reported in equity is immediately recognised in the income statement.
Changes in the fair value of derivatives that are designated and qualify as fair value
hedges are recorded in the income statement, together with any changes in the fair value of the hedged asset or liability that are attributable to the hedged risk.
If the hedge no longer meets the criteria for hedge accounting, the adjustment to the carrying amount of a hedged item for which the effective interest method is used is amortised to profit or loss for the period to maturity.
Hedges of net investments in foreign operations are accounted for similarly to cash flow hedges. Any gain or loss on the hedging instrument relating to the effective portion of the hedge is recognised in equity; the gain or loss relating to the ineffective portion is recognised immediately in the income statement. Gains and losses accumulated in equity are included in the income statement when the foreign operation is disposed of.
Certain derivative instruments hedging future cash flows do not qualify for hedge accounting. Fair value changes of these financial derivative instruments are recognised in items affecting comparability in the income statement.
Fair value measurements are classified using a fair value hierarchy i.e. Level 1, Level 2 and Level 3 that reflects the significance of the inputs used in making the measurements.
The fair value of some commodity derivatives traded in active markets (such as publicly traded electricity options, coal and oil forwards) are market quotes at the closing date.
The fair value of financial instruments including electricity derivatives traded in active markets (such as publicly traded derivatives, and trading and available for sale securities) is based on quoted market prices at the closing date. Known calculation techniques, such as estimated discounted
cash flows, are used to determine fair value of interest rate and currency financial instruments. The fair value of interest-rate swaps is calculated as the present value of the estimated future cash flows. The fair value of forward foreign exchange contracts is determined using forward exchange market rates at the closing date. Fair values of options are determined by using option valuation models. The fair value of financial liabilities is estimated by discounting the future contractual cash flows at the current market interest rate that is available to the Group for similar financial instruments. In fair valuation, credit spread has not been adjusted, as quoted market prices of the instruments used are believed to be consistent with the objective of a fair value measurement.
The Group bases the calculation on existing market conditions at each closing date. Financial instruments used in Fortum are standardised products that are either cleared via exchanges or widely traded in the market. Commodity derivatives are generally cleared through exchanges such as for example NASDAQ OMX Commodities Europe and financial derivatives done with creditworthy financial institutions with investment grade ratings.
Fair valuation of electricity derivatives maturing over ten years which are not standard NASDAQ OMX Commodities Europe products are based on prices collected from reliable market participants. Other financial assets and liabilities that are not based on observable market data.
The nominal value less estimated credit adjustments of trade receivables and payables are assumed to approximate their fair values.
See Note 17. Financial assets and liabilities by fair value hierarchy
Intangible assets, except goodwill, are stated at the historical cost less accumulated amortisation and impairment losses. They are amortised on a straight-line method over their expected useful lives.
Acquired computer software licences are capitalised on the basis of the costs incurred when bringing the software into use. Costs
associated with developing or maintaining computer software are recognised as an expense as incurred. Costs that are directly associated with the production of identifiable and unique software products controlled by the Group, and that will generate economic benefits exceeding costs beyond one year, are recognised as intangible assets. Direct costs include the software development employee costs and an appropriate portion of relevant overheads. Computer software costs recognised as assets are amortised over their estimated useful lives (three to five years).
Trademarks and licences are shown at historical cost less accumulated amortisation and impairment losses, as applicable. Amortisation is calculated using the straightline method to allocate the cost of trademarks and licences over their estimated useful lives (15-20 years).
Contractual customer relationships acquired in a business combination are recognised at fair value on acquisition date. The contractual customer relations have a finite useful life and are carried at costs less accumulated amortisation. Amortisation is calculated using the straight-line method over the expected duration of the customer relationship.
Goodwill represents the excess of the cost of an acquisition over the fair value of the Group's share of net identifiable assets of the acquired subsidiary/associate at the date of acquisition. Goodwill on acquisitions of subsidiaries is included in intangible assets. Goodwill on acquisition of associates is included in investments in associates and is tested for impairment as part of the overall balance. Separately recognised goodwill is tested annually for impairment and carried at cost less accumulated impairment losses. Impairment losses on goodwill are not reversed. Gains and losses on disposal of an entity include the carrying amount of goodwill relating to the entity sold.
Property, plant and equipment comprise mainly power and heat producing buildings and machinery, transmission lines, tunnels, waterfall rights and district heating network. Property, plant and equipment are stated at historical cost less accumulated depreciation and accumulated impairment losses as applicable in the consolidated balance sheet. Historical cost includes expenditure that is directly attributable to the acquisition of an item and borrowing costs capitalised in accordance with the Group's accounting policy. Cost may also include transfers from equity of any gains or losses on qualifying cash flow hedges of foreign currency purchases of property, plant and equipment. Acquired assets on the acquisition of a new subsidiary are stated at their fair values at the date of acquisition.
Subsequent costs are included in the asset's carrying amount or recognised as a separate asset, as appropriate, only when it is probable that future economic benefits associated with the item will flow to the Group and the cost of the item can be measured reliably. All other repairs and maintenance are charged to the income statement during the financial period in which they are incurred.
Additionally the cost of an item of property, plant and equipment includes the estimated cost of its dismantlement, removal or restoration.
See Note 31 Other provisions for information about asset retirement obligations.
Land, water areas, waterfall rights and tunnels are not depreciated since they have indefinite useful lives. Depreciation on other assets is calculated using the straight-line method to allocate their cost to their residual values over their estimated useful lives, as follows:
The assets' residual values and useful lives are reviewed, and adjusted if appropriate, at each closing date. An asset's carrying amount is written down immediately to its
recoverable amount if the asset's carrying amount is greater than its estimated recoverable amount.
The individual assets' carrying values are reviewed at each closing date to determine whether there is any indication of impairment. An asset's carrying amount is written down immediately to its recoverable amount if it is greater than the estimated recoverable amount.
When considering the need for impairment the Group assesses if events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount may not be recoverable. This assessment is documented once a year in connection with the Business Plan process. Indications for impairment are analysed separately by each division as they are different for each business and include risks such as changes in electricity and fuel prices, regulatory/political changes relating to energy taxes and price regulations etc. Impairment testing needs to be performed if any of the impairment indications exists. Assets that have an indefinite useful life and goodwill, are not subject to amortisation and are tested annually for impairment.
An impairment loss is recognised in the income statement for the amount by which the assets' carrying amount exceeds its recoverable amount. The recoverable amount is the higher of an asset's fair value less costs to sell and value in use. For the purpose of assessing impairment, assets are grouped at the lowest levels for which there are separately identifiable cash flows (cashgenerating units). Goodwill is allocated to cash-generating units for the purpose of impairment testing. The allocation is made to those cash-generating units or groups of cash-generating units that are expected to benefit from the business combination in which the goodwill arose.
Value in use is determined by discounting the future cash flows expected to be derived from an asset or cash-generating unit. Cash flow projections are based on the most recent Business Plan that has been approved by management and the Board of Directors. Cash flows arising from future investments such as new plants are excluded unless projects have been started. The cash outflow needed to complete the started projects is included.
The period covered by cash flows is related to the useful lives of the assets reviewed for
impairment. According to IFRS, projections used should cover a maximum period of five years, but longer period can be justifiable in certain circumstances. The Group uses a longer projection period than normally allowed by IFRS, which reflects the long useful lives of power plants and other major assets. Cash flow projections beyond the period covered by the most recent business plan are estimated by extrapolating the projections using growth rates estimated by management for subsequent years.
Non-financial assets other than goodwill that suffered an impairment charge are reviewed for possible reversal of the impairment at each reporting date.
Grants from the government are recognised at their fair value where there is a reasonable assurance that the grant will be received and the Group will comply with all attached conditions. Government grants relating to costs are deferred and recognised in the income statement over the period necessary to match them with the costs that they are intended to compensate. Government grants relating to the purchase of property, plant and equipment are deducted from the acquisition cost of the asset and are recognised as income by reducing the depreciation charge of the asset they relate to.
Borrowing costs directly attributable to the acquisition, construction or production of qualifying assets are added to the cost of those assets, until such time as the assets are substantially ready for their intended use or sale. Qualifying assets are assets that necessarily take a substantial period of time to get ready for their intended use or sale.
All other borrowing costs are recognised in profit or loss in the period in which they are incurred.
Fortum owns, through its subsidiary Fortum Power and Heat Oy, the coal condensing power plant Meri-Pori in Finland. Teollisuuden Voima Oyj (TVO) has the contractual right to participate in the plant with 45.45%. The capacity and production is divided between Fortum and TVO. Each owner can decide when and how much capacity to use for production. Both Fortum and TVO purchase fuel and emission rights independently. Since Fortum and TVO are sharing control of the power plant, Meri-Pori is accounted for as a joint operation. Fortum is accounting for its
part of the investment, i.e. 54.55%. Fortum is also entitled to part of the electricity TVO produces in Meri-Pori through its shareholding of 26.58% of TVO C-series shares.
For further information regarding Fortum's shareholding in TVO, see Note 20 Participations in associated companies and joint ventures.
See Note 19. Property, plant and equipment
The Group's interests in associated companies and jointly controlled entities are accounted for using the equity method of accounting. Assets acquired and liabilities assumed in the investment in associates or joint ventures are measured initially at their fair values at the acquisition date. The excess of the cost of acquisition over the fair value of the Group's share of the identifiable net assets acquired is recorded as goodwill. If the cost of acquisition is less than the fair value of the net assets of the associate or joint venture acquired, the difference is recognised directly in the income statement.
The Group's share of its associates or joint ventures post-acquisition profits or losses after tax and the expenses related to the adjustments to the fair values of the assets and liabilities assumed are recognised in the income statement. The cumulative postacquisition movements are adjusted against the carrying amount of the investment. The Group's share of post-acquisition adjustments to associates or joint ventures equity that has not been recognised in the associates or joint ventures income statement, is recognised directly in Group's shareholder's equity and against the carrying amount of the investment.
When the Group's share of losses in an associate or a joint venture equals or exceeds its interest in the associate or joint venture, including any other unsecured receivables, the Group does not recognise further losses, unless it has incurred obligations or made payments on behalf of the associate or joint venture.
Unrealised gains on transactions between the Group and its associates or joint ventures are eliminated to the extent of the Group's interest in the associate or joint venture. Unrealised losses are also eliminated unless the transaction provides evidence of an impairment of the asset transferred. Accounting policies of associates or joint ventures have been changed where
necessary to ensure consistency with the policies adopted by the Group.
If more recent information is not available, the share of the profit of certain associated or joint venture companies is included in the consolidated accounts based on the latest available information.
See Note 20. Participations in associated companies and joint ventures
Inventories mainly consist of fuels consumed in the production process or in the rendering of services. Inventories are stated at the lower of cost and net realisable value being the estimated selling price for the end product, less applicable variable selling expenses and other production costs. Cost is determined using the first-in, first-out (FIFO) method.
Inventories which are acquired primarily for the purpose of trading are stated at fair value less selling expenses.
Trade receivables are recorded at their fair value. A provision for impairment of trade receivables is established when there is evidence that the Group will not be able to collect all amounts due according to the original terms of the receivable. Significant financial difficulties of the debtor, probability that the debtor will enter into bankruptcy or financial reorganisation, and default or delinquency in payments are considered as indicators that the receivable is impaired. The amount of the impairment charge is measured as the difference between the asset's carrying amount and the present value of estimated future cash flows.
Trade receivables include revenue based on an estimate of electricity, heat, cooling and distribution of electricity already delivered but not yet measured and not yet invoiced.
See Note 24. Trade and other receivables
Cash and cash equivalents in Liquid funds include cash in hand, deposits held at call with banks and other short-term, highly liquid investments with maturities of three months or less. Bank overdrafts are shown within borrowings in current liabilities in the balance sheet.
Where any group company purchases the Company's shares (treasury shares), the consideration paid, including any directly attributable incremental costs (net of income taxes), is deducted from equity attributable to the Company's equity holders until cancelled or reissued. When such shares are subsequently sold or reissued, any consideration received is included in equity.
Borrowings are recognised initially at fair value less transaction costs incurred. In subsequent periods, they are stated at amortised cost; any difference between proceeds (net of transaction costs) and the redemption value is recognised as interest cost over the period of the borrowing using the effective interest method. Borrowings or portion of borrowings being hedged with a fair value hedge are recognised at fair value.
The tax currently payable is based on taxable profit for the year. Taxable profit differs from profit as reported in the consolidated income statement because of items of income or expense that are taxable or deductible in other years and items that are never taxable or deductible. The Group's liability for current tax is calculated using tax rates that have been enacted or substantively enacted by the end of the reporting period.
Deferred tax is provided in full, using the liability method, on temporary differences arising between the tax bases of assets and liabilities and their carrying amounts in the consolidated financial statements. However, if the deferred tax arises from initial recognition of an asset or liability in a transaction other than a business combination that at the time of the transaction affects neither accounting nor taxable profit or loss, it is not accounted for. Deferred tax is determined using tax rates (and laws) that have been enacted or substantially enacted by the closing date and are expected to apply when the related deferred tax asset is realised or the deferred tax liability is settled.
Deferred tax assets are recognised to the extent that it is probable that future taxable profit will be available against which the temporary differences can be utilised. Deferred tax assets are set off against
deferred tax liabilities if they relate to income taxes levied by the same taxation authority.
Deferred tax is provided on temporary differences arising from investments in subsidiaries, associates and joint ventures, except where the timing of the reversal of the temporary difference is controlled by the Group, and it is probable that the temporary difference will not reverse in the foreseeable future.
Fortum owns Loviisa nuclear power plant in Finland. Fortum's nuclear related provisions and the related part of the State Nuclear Waste Management Fund are both presented separately in the balance sheet. Fortum's share in the State Nuclear Waste Management Fund is accounted for according to IFRIC 5, Rights to interests arising from decommissioning, restoration and environmental rehabilitation funds which states that the fund assets are measured at the lower of fair value or the value of the related liabilities since Fortum does not have control or joint control over the State Nuclear Waste Management Fund. The Nuclear Waste Management Fund is managed by governmental authorities. The related provisions are the provision for decommissioning and the provision for disposal of spent fuel.
The fair values of the provisions are calculated according to IAS 37 by discounting the separate future cash flows, which are based on estimated future costs and actions already taken. The initial net present value of the provision for decommissioning (at the time of commissioning the nuclear power plant) has been included in the investment cost and is depreciated over the estimated operating time of the nuclear power plant. Changes in the technical plans etc., which have an impact on the future cash flow of the estimated costs for decommissioning, are accounted for by discounting the additional costs to the current point in time. The increased asset retirement cost due to the increased provision is added to property, plant and equipment and depreciated over the remaining estimated operating time of the nuclear power plant.
The provision for spent fuel covers the future disposal costs for fuel used until the end of the accounting period. Costs for disposal of spent fuel are expensed during the operating time based on fuel usage. The impact of the possible changes in the estimated future cash flow for related costs is recognised immediately in the income statement based on the accumulated amount of fuel used until the end of the accounting period. The related interest costs due to unwinding of the provision, for the period during which the spent fuel provision has been accumulated and present point in time, are also recognised immediately in the income statement.
The timing factor is taken into account by recognising the interest expense related to discounting the nuclear provisions. The interest on the State Nuclear Waste Management Fund assets is presented as financial income.
Fortum's actual share of the State Nuclear Waste Management Fund, related to Loviisa nuclear power plant, is higher than the carrying value of the Fund in the balance sheet. The legal nuclear liability should, according to the Finnish Nuclear Energy Act, be fully covered by payments and guarantees to the State Nuclear Waste Management Fund. The legal liability is not discounted while the provisions are, and since the future cash flow is spread over 100 years, the difference between the legal liability and the provisions are material.
The annual fee to the Fund is based on changes in the legal liability, the interest income generated in the State Nuclear Waste Management Fund and incurred costs of taken actions.
Fortum also has minority shareholdings in the associated nuclear power production companies Teollisuuden Voima Oyj (TVO) in Finland and directly and indirectly in OKG AB and Forsmarks Kraftgrupp AB in Sweden. The Group's interests in associated companies are accounted for by the equity method. Accounting policies of the associates regarding nuclear assets and liabilities have been changed where necessary to ensure consistency with the policies adopted by the Group.
Provisions for environmental restorations, asset retirement obligations, restructuring costs and legal claims are recognised when the Group has a present legal or constructive obligation as a result of past events to a third party, it is probable that an outflow of resources will be required to settle the
obligation and the amount can be reliably estimated.
Provisions are measured at the present value of the expenditures expected to be required to settle the obligation using a pre-tax rate that reflects current market assessments of the time value of money and the risks specific to the obligation. The increase in the provision due to the passage of time is recognised as interest expense.
Environmental provisions are recognised, based on current interpretation of environmental laws and regulations, when it is probable that a present obligation has arisen and the amount of such liability can be reliably estimated. Environmental expenditures resulting from the remediation of an existing condition caused by past operations, and which do contribute to current or future revenues, are expensed as incurred.
Asset retirement obligation is recognised either when there is a contractual obligation towards a third party or a legal obligation and the obligation amount can be estimated reliably. Obligating event is e.g. when a plant is built on a leased land with an obligation to dismantle and remove the asset in the future or when a legal obligation towards Fortum changes. The asset retirement obligation is recognised as part of the cost of an item of property and plant when the asset is put in service or when contamination occurs. The costs will be depreciated over the remainder of the asset's useful life.
A restructuring provision is recognised when the Group has developed a detailed formal plan for the restructuring and has raised a valid expectation in those affected that it will carry out the restructuring by starting to implement the plan or announcing its main features to those affected by it. The measurement of a restructuring provision includes only the direct expenditures arising from the restructuring, which are those amounts that are both necessarily entailed by the restructuring and not associated with the ongoing activities of the entity. Restructuring provisions comprise mainly of employee
termination payments and lease termination costs.
The Group companies have various pension schemes in accordance with the local conditions and practises in the countries in which they operate. The schemes are generally funded through payments to insurance companies or Group's pension fund as determined by periodic actuarial calculations. The Group has both defined benefit and defined contribution plans.
The Group's contributions to defined contribution plans are charged to the income statement in the period to which the contributions relate.
For defined benefit plans, pension costs are assessed using the projected unit credit method. The cost of providing pensions is charged to the income statement as to spread the service cost over the service lives of employees. The net interest is presented in financial items and the rest of the income statement effect as pension cost.
The defined benefit obligation is calculated annually on the balance sheet date and is measured as the present value of the estimated future cash flows using interest rates of high-quality corporate bonds that have terms to maturity approximating to the terms of the related pension liability. In countries where there is no deep market in such bonds, market yields on government bonds are used instead. The plan assets for pensions are valued at market value. The liability recognised in the balance sheet is the defined benefit obligation at the closing date less the fair value of plan assets. Prepaid contributions are recognised as an asset to the extent that a cash refund or a reduction in the future payments is available.
When the benefits of a plan are changed or when a plan is curtailed, the resulting change in benefit that relates to past service or the gain or loss related to a curtailment is recognised immediately in profit or loss. Gains or losses on settlements of defined benefits plans are recognised when the settlement occurs.
See Note 32. Pension obligations
Leases of property, plant and equipment, where the Group has substantially all the risks and rewards of ownership, are classified as finance leases. Finance leases are capitalised at the commencement of the lease term at the lower of the fair value of the leased property and the present value of the minimum lease payments determined at the inception of the lease. Each lease payment is allocated between the reduction of the outstanding liability and the finance charges. The corresponding rental obligations, net of finance charges, are included in the longterm or short-term interest-bearing liabilities according to their maturities. The interest element of the finance cost is charged to the income statement over the lease term so as to produce a constant periodic rate of interest on the remaining balance of the liability for each period. The property, plant and equipment acquired under finance leases are depreciated over the shorter of the useful life of the asset or the lease term.
Leases of property, plant and equipment, where the Group does not have substantially all of the risks and rewards of ownership are classified as operating leases. Payments made under operating leases are recognised in the income statement as costs on a straight-line basis over the lease term.
Payments received under operating leases where the Group leases out fixed assets are recognised as other income in the income statement.
A contingent liability is disclosed when there is a possible obligation that arises from past events and whose existence is only confirmed by one or more doubtful future events or when there is an obligation that is not recognised as a liability or provision because it is not probable that an outflow of resources will be required or the amount of the obligation cannot be reliably estimated.
See Note 38. Contingent liabilities
The preparation of IFRS consolidated financial statements requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities existing at the balance sheet date as well as the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period.
Estimates and judgements are continually evaluated and are based on historical experience and other factors, including expectations of future events that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances. Actual results and timing may differ from these estimates.
The table below is listing the areas where management's accounting estimates and judgements are most critical to reported results and financial position. The table is also showing where to find more information about those estimates.
| Critical accounting estimates | Note |
|---|---|
| Assigned values and useful lifes determined for intangible assets and property, plant and equipment acquired in a business combination |
18. Intangible assets |
| Assumptions related to impairment testing of property, plant and equipment and intangible assets |
19. Property, plant and equipment |
| Judgement used when assessing the nature of Fortum's interest in its investees and when considering the classification of Fortum's joint arrangements |
20. Participations in associated companies and joint ventures |
| Assumptions and estimates regarding future tax consequences | 29. Deferred income taxes |
| 39. Legal actions and official proceedings | |
| Assumptions made to determine long-term cash flow forecasts of estimated costs for | |
| provision related to nuclear production | 30. Nuclear related assets and liabilities |
| Assumptions used to determine future pension obligations | 32. Pension obligations |
In an acquisition acquired intangible and tangible assets are fair valued and their remaining useful lives are determined. Management believes that the assigned values and useful lives, as well as the underlying assumptions, are reasonable. Different assumptions and assigned lives could have a significant impact on the reported amounts.
The Group has significant carrying values in property, plant and equipment as well as goodwill which are tested for impairment according to the accounting policies.
See Note 18 Intangible assets and Note 19 Property, plant and equipment.
The Group has significant carrying values in property, plant and equipment as well as goodwill which are tested for impairment according to the accounting policy described in the notes. The recoverable amounts of cash-generating units have been determined based on value in use calculations. These calculations are based on estimated future
cash flows from most recent approved business plan. Preparation of these estimates requires management to make assumptions relating to future expectations. Assumptions vary depending on the business the tested assets are in. For power and heat generation business the main assumptions relate to the estimated future operating cash flows and the discount rates used to present value them. The distribution business is regulated and supervised by national authorities. Estimated future cash flows include assumptions relating to the development of the future regulatory framework.
Estimates are also made in an acquisition when determining the fair values and remaining useful lives of acquired intangible and tangible assets.
See Note 18 Intangible assets and Note 19 Property, plant and equipment.
Management is required to make significant judgements when assessing the nature of Fortum's interest in its investees and when considering the classification of Fortum's joint arrangements. In the classification, emphasis has been put on decision-making, legal structure and financing of the arrangements.
See Note 20 Participation in associated companies and joint ventures.
Fortum has deferred tax assets and liabilities which are expected to be realised through the income statement over the extended periods of time in the future. In calculating the deferred tax items, Fortum is required to make certain assumptions and estimates regarding the future tax consequences attributable to differences between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities as recorded in the financial statements and their tax basis.
Assumptions made include the expectation that future operating performance for subsidiaries will be consistent with historical levels of operating results, recoverability periods for tax loss carry-forwards will not change, and that existing tax laws and rates will remain unchanged into foreseeable future. Fortum believes that it has prudent assumptions in developing its deferred tax balances.
The Group recognises liabilities for anticipated tax dispute issues based on estimates of whether additional taxes will be
due. Where the final outcome of these matters is different from the amounts that were initially recorded, such differences will impact the income tax and deferred tax provisions in the period in which such determination is made.
If the actual final outcome (regarding tax disputes) would differ negatively from management's estimates with 10%, the Group would need to increase the income tax liability by EUR 39 million as of 31December 2014.
The provision for future obligations for nuclear waste management including decommissioning of Fortum's nuclear power plant and related spent fuel is based on longterm cash flow forecasts of estimated future costs. The main assumptions are technical plans, timing, cost estimates and discount rate. The technical plans, timing and cost estimates are approved by governmental authorities.
Any changes in the assumed discount rate would affect the provision. If the discount rate used would be lowered, the provision would increase. Fortum has contributed cash to the State Nuclear Waste Management Fund based on a non-discounted legal liability, which leads to that the increase in provision would be offset by an increase in the recorded share of Fortum's part of the State Nuclear Waste Management Fund in the balance sheet. The total effect on the income statement would be positive since the decommissioning part of the provision is treated as an asset retirement obligation. This situation will prevail as long as the legal obligation to contribute cash to the State Nuclear Waste Management Fund is based on a non-discounted liability and IFRS is limiting the carrying value of the assets to the
amount of the provision since Fortum does not have control or joint control over the fund.
Based on the Nuclear Energy Act in Finland, Fortum has a legal obligation to fully fund the legal liability decided by the governmental authorities, for decommissioning of the power plant and disposal of spent fuel through the State Nuclear Waste Management Fund.
The present value of the pension obligations is based on actuarial calculations that use several assumptions. Any changes in these assumptions will impact the carrying amount of pension obligations.
See Note 32 Pension obligations.
Risk management objectives, principles and framework including governance, organisation and processes as well as description of risks i.e. strategic, financial and operational risks are described in the Operating and financial review (OFR).
Commodity market risk refers to the potential negative effects of market price movements or volume changes in electricity, fuels and environmental values. A number of different methods, such as Profit-at-Risk and Value-at-Risk, are used throughout Fortum to quantify these risks taking into account their interdependencies. Stress-testing is carried out in order to assess the effects of extreme price movements on Fortum's earnings.
Commodity market risk management aims to limit downside and capture potential upside by optimising hedging activities. Risk taking is limited through the use of risk mandates approved according to authority levels defined by the CEO. These risk mandates including volumetric limits, Profit-at-Risk limits and Stop-Loss limits.
Strategies for hedging the electricity price are developed and executed within the framework and risk mandates approved by the CEO. In the Nordic markets, the hedging strategies are executed by entering into commodity derivatives contracts such as forward or futures, mainly on Nasdaq OMX Commodities Europe. The majority of electricity price risk in Russia is hedged with physical fixed priced delivery contracts. Hedging strategies for Russia are developed in line with the development of the financial electricity market. Risk in the hedging strategies and their execution are continuously evaluated in accordance with models approved by the Chief Risk Officer.
Fortum's sensitivity to electricity market price is dependent on the hedge level for a given time period. As per 31 December 2014, approximately 50% of the Power Segment's estimated Nordic power sales volume was hedged for the calendar year 2015 and approximately 10% for the calendar year 2016. Assuming no changes in generation volumes, hedge ratios or cost structure a 1 EUR/MWh change in the market price of electricity would affect Fortum's 2015 comparable operating profit by approximately EUR 23 million and for 2016 by approximately EUR 41 million. The volume used in this sensitivity analysis is 45 TWh which includes the electricity generation sold to the spot market in Sweden and Finland in the Power Segment without minority owner's shares of electricity or other pass-through sales, and excluding the volume of Fortum's coal-condensing generation. This volume is heavily dependent on price level, the hydrological situation, the length of annual maintenance periods and availability of power plants. Sensitivity is calculated only for electricity market price movements. Hydrological conditions, temperature, CO2 allowance prices, fuel prices and the import/export situation all affect the electricity price on short-term basis and effects of individual factors cannot be separated.
Sensitivity analysis shows the sensitivity arising from financial electricity derivatives as defined in IFRS 7. These derivatives are used for hedging purposes within Fortum. Sensitivities are calculated based on 31 December 2014 (31 December 2013) position. Positions are actively managed in the day-to-day business operations and therefore the sensitivities vary from time to time. Sensitivity analysis includes only the market risks arising from derivatives i.e. the underlying physical electricity sales and purchase are not included. Sensitivity is calculated with the assumption that electricity forward quotations in NASDAQ OMX Commodities Europe and in EEX would change 1 EUR/MWh for the period Fortum has derivatives.
| +/- 1 EUR/MWh change in electricity forward quotations, EUR million | Effect | 2014 | 2013 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Effect on Profit before income tax | -/+ | 7 | 7 |
| Effect on Equity | -/+ | 13 | 22 |
The tables below disclose the Group's electricity derivatives used mainly for hedging electricity price risk. The fair values represent the values disclosed in the balance sheet.
| Volume, TWh | Fair value, EUR million | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Under 1 year |
1-5 years |
Over 5 years |
Total | Positive | Negative | Net | |
| Electricity derivatives | 75 | 33 | 1 | 109 | 304 | 219 | 85 |
| Total | 75 | 33 | 1 | 109 | 304 | 219 | 85 |
| Netting against electricity exchanges 1) | -139 | -139 | 0 | ||||
| Total | 164 | 80 | 85 |
| Volume, TWh | Fair value, EUR million | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Under 1 year |
1-5 years |
Over 5 years |
Total | Positive | Negative | Net | |
| Electricity derivatives | 79 | 36 | 0 | 115 | 502 | 292 | 209 |
| Total | 79 | 36 | 0 | 115 | 502 | 292 | 209 |
| Netting against electricity exchanges 1) | -227 | -227 | 0 | ||||
| Total | 277 | 68 | 209 |
1) Receivables and liabilities against electricity exchanges arising from standard derivative contracts with same delivery period are netted.
Amounts in the table are fair values.
| 2014 | 2013 | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EUR million | Under 1 year |
1-5 years |
Over 5 years |
Total | Under 1 year |
1-5 years |
Over 5 years |
Total |
| Electricity derivatives assets | 114 | 49 | 1 | 164 | 192 | 83 | 2 | 277 |
| Electricity derivatives liabilities | 28 | 51 | 1 | 80 | 31 | 35 | 2 | 68 |
| Other commodity derivatives, assets |
12 | 3 | 15 | 29 | 3 | 0 | 32 | |
| Other commodity derivatives, liabilities |
4 | 3 | 7 | 11 | 2 | 0 | 13 |
Exposure to fuel prices is to some extent limited because of Fortum's flexible generation possibilities, which allow for switching between different fuels according to prevailing market conditions, and in some cases, the fuel price risk can be transferred to the customer. The remaining exposure to fuel price risk is mitigated through fixed price purchases that cover forecasted consumption levels. Fixed price purchases can be either for physical deliveries or in the form of financial hedges, such as oil and coal derivatives.
Part of Fortum's power and heat generation is subject to requirements of emission trading schemes. Fortum manages its exposure to these prices and volumes through the use of CO2 forwards and by ensuring that the costs of allowances are taken into account during production planning. Most of these CO2 forwards are own use contracts valued at cost and some are treated as derivatives in the accounts.
Fortum's business is capital intensive and the Group has a regular need to raise financing. Fortum has a diversified loan portfolio mainly consisting of long-term financing denominated in EUR and SEK. Long-term financing is primarily raised by issuing bonds under Fortum's Euro Medium Term Note programme as well as through bilateral and syndicated loan facilities from a variety of different financial institutions. Seasonal variations in working capital are generally financed by issuing short-term commercial papers under the Group's Swedish (SEK) and Finnish (EUR) Commercial Paper programmes.
Financing is primarily raised on parent company level and distributed internally through various internal financing arrangements. For example Fortum's Russian operations are mainly financed via intra group internal long term RUB denominated loans. The internal RUB loan receivables are hedged via external forward contracts offsetting the currency exposure for the internal lender. On 31 December 2014, 96% (2013: 95%) of the Group's total external financing was raised by the parent company Fortum Oyj.
On 31 December 2014, the total interest-bearing debt was EUR 6,983 million (2013: 9,058) and the interest-bearing net debt was EUR 4,217 million (2013: 7,793). Net debt without Värme financing was EUR 3,664 million (2013: 6,658).
Fortum manages liquidity and refinancing risks through a combination of cash positions and committed credit facility agreements with its core banks. The Group shall at all times have access to cash, marketable securities and unused committed credit facilities including overdrafts, to cover all loans maturing within the next twelve-month period. However, cash/marketable securities and unused committed credit facilities shall always amount to at least EUR 500 million.
On 31 December 2014, loan maturities for the coming twelve-month period amounted to EUR 1,103 million (2013: 2,106). Liquid funds amounted to EUR 2,766 million (2013: 1,265) and the total amount of committed credit facilities amounted to EUR 2,214 million (2013: 2,218) of which EUR 2,214 million (2013: 2,218) was undrawn.
| EUR million | 2014 |
|---|---|
| 2015 | 1,103 |
| 2016 | 860 |
| 2017 | 530 |
| 2018 | 614 |
| 2019 | 820 |
| 2020 and later | 3,056 |
| Total | 6,983 |
| Total | Drawn | Available | |
|---|---|---|---|
| EUR million | facility | amount | amount |
| Liquid funds | |||
| Cash and cash equivalents | 2,009 | ||
| Bank deposits over 3 months | 757 | ||
| Total | 2,766 | ||
| of which in Russia (OAO Fortum) | 134 | ||
| Committed credit lines | |||
| EUR 2,000 million syndicated credit facility | 2,000 | - | 2,000 |
| Bilateral overdraft facilities | 214 | - | 214 |
| Total | 2,214 | - | 2,214 |
| Debt programmes (uncommitted) | |||
| Fortum Corporation, CP programme EUR 500 million | 500 | - | 500 |
| Fortum Corporation, CP programme SEK 5,000 million | 532 | - | 532 |
| Fortum Corporation, EMTN programme EUR 8,000 million | 8,000 | 4,748 | 3,252 |
| Total | 9,032 | 4,748 | 4,284 |
| Total | Drawn | Available | |
|---|---|---|---|
| EUR million | facility | amount | amount |
| Liquid funds | |||
| Cash and cash equivalents 1) | 1,265 | ||
| Bank deposits over 3 months | - | ||
| Total | 1,265 | ||
| of which in Russia (OAO Fortum) | 113 | ||
| Committed credit lines | |||
| EUR 2,500 million syndicated credit facility | 2,000 | - | 2,000 |
| Bilateral overdraft facilities | 218 | - | 218 |
| Total | 2,218 | - | 2,218 |
| Debt programmes (uncommitted) | |||
| Fortum Corporation, CP programme EUR 500 million | 500 | 381 | 119 |
| Fortum Corporation, CP programme SEK 5,000 million | 564 | 337 | 227 |
| Fortum Corporation, EMTN programme EUR 8,000 million | 8,000 | 5,839 | 2,161 |
| Total | 9,064 | 6,557 | 2,507 |
1) Including cash balances of EUR 0 million (2013: 15) classified as assets held for sale in the balance sheet.
Liquid funds amounted to EUR 2,766 million (2013: 1,265), including OAO Fortum's bank deposits amounting to EUR 131 million (2013: 101) earmarked for capacity increase investments in Russia. Of these deposits at year-end 2014 EUR 30 million (2013: 58) were in euros and EUR million 101 (2013: 43) in Russian roubles.
See also Note 25 Liquid funds.
Amounts disclosed below are non-discounted expected cash flows (future interest payments and amortisations) of interest-bearing liabilities and interest rate and currency derivatives.
| 2014 2013 |
||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Under | 1-5 | Over 5 | Under | 1-5 | Over 5 | |||
| EUR million | 1 year | years | years | Total | 1 year | years | years | Total |
| Interest-bearing liabilities | 1,295 | 3,370 | 3,265 | 7,930 | 2,374 | 3,896 | 4,249 | 10,519 |
| Interest rate and currency derivatives liabilities | 5,955 | 1,650 | 100 | 7,705 | 7,286 | 2,098 | 294 | 9,678 |
| Interest rate and currency derivatives receivables | -6,228 | -1,890 | -134 | -8,252 | -7,311 | -2,179 | -271 | -9,761 |
| Total | 1,022 | 3,130 | 3,231 | 7,383 | 2,349 | 3,815 | 4,272 | 10,436 |
Interest-bearing liabilities include loans from the State Nuclear Waste Management Fund and Teollisuuden Voima Oyj of EUR 1,040 million (2013: 995). These loans are renewed yearly and the related interest payments are calculated for ten years in the table above.
For further information regarding loans from the State Nuclear Waste Management Fund and Teollisuuden Voima Oyj, see Note 30 Nuclear related assets and liabilities.
The Treasury risk policy stipulated in 2014 that the average duration of the debt portfolio shall always be kept within a range of 24 and 48 months and that the flow risk i.e. changes in interest rates shall not affect the net interest payments of the Group by more than EUR 50 million for the next rolling 12-month period. Within these mandates, strategies are evaluated and developed in order to find an optimal balance between risk and financing cost.
On 31 December 2014, the average duration of the debt portfolio (including derivatives) was 3.7 years (2013: 2.4). Approximately 46% (2013: 51%) of the debt portfolio was on a floating rate basis or fixed rate loans maturing within the next 12 month period. The effect of one percentage point change in interest rates on the present value of the debt portfolio was EUR 151 million on 31 December 2014 (2013: 179). The flow risk, measured as the difference between the base case net interest cost estimate and the worst case scenario estimate for Fortum's debt portfolio for the coming 12 months, was EUR 18 million (2013: 14).
The average interest rate on loans and derivatives on 31 December 2014 was 3.7% (2013: 3.6%). Average cumulative interest rate on loans and derivatives for 2014 was 4.0% (2013: 4.1%).
Fortum's policy is to hedge major transaction exposures to avoid exchange differences in the profit and loss statement. These exposures are mainly hedged with forward contracts.
Translation exposures in the Fortum Group are generally not hedged as the majority of these assets are considered to be long-term strategic holdings. In Fortum this means largely entities operating in Sweden, Russia, Norway and Poland, whose base currency is not euro.
The currency risk relating to transaction exposures is measured using Value-at-Risk (VaR) for a one-day period at 95% confidence level. Translation exposures relating to net investments in foreign entities are measured using a five day period at 95% confidence level. The limit for transaction exposure is VaR EUR 5 million. On 31 December 2014 the open transaction and translation exposures were EUR 0 million (2013: 1) and EUR 4,310 million (2013: 4,837) respectively. The VaR for the transaction exposure was EUR 0 million (2013: 0) and VaR for the translation exposure was EUR 246 million (2013: 55).
| 2014 | 2013 | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net | |||||||
| EUR million | Net position | Hedge | Open | position | Hedge | Open | |
| SEK | 4,821 | -4,821 | 0 | 5,595 | -5,595 | 0 | |
| USD | -12 | 12 | 0 | -11 | 11 | 0 | |
| NOK | -75 | 75 | 0 | 39 | -39 | 0 | |
| RUB | 483 | -483 | 0 | 523 | -523 | 0 | |
| PLN | 88 | -88 | 0 | 110 | -110 | 0 | |
| Other | -10 | 10 | 0 | 59 | -58 | 1 | |
| Total | 5,295 | -5,295 | 0 | 6,315 | -6,314 | 1 |
In addition OAO Fortum is hedging its euro investments with euro deposits EUR 30 million (2013: 58), which qualifies as a cash flow hedge in Fortum group accounts.
Transaction exposure is defined as already contracted or forecasted foreign exchange dependent items and cash flows. Transaction exposure is divided into balance sheet exposure and cash flow exposure. Balance sheet exposure reflects currency denominated assets and liabilities for example loans, deposits and accounts receivable/payable in currencies other than the company's base currency. Cash flow exposure reflects future forecasted or contracted currency flows in foreign currency deriving from business activities such as sales, purchases or investments. Net conversion differences from transaction exposure are entered under financial income or expense when related to financial items or when related to accounts receivable/payable entered under items included in operating profit. Conversion differences related to qualifying cash flow hedges are deferred to equity.
Fortum's policy is to hedge balance sheet exposures in order to avoid exchange rate differences in the income statement. The Group's balance sheet exposure mainly relates to financing of Swedish subsidiaries and the fact that the Group's main external financing currency is EUR. For derivatives hedging this balance exposure Fortum does not apply hedge accounting, because they have a natural hedge in the income statement.
Contracted cash flow exposures shall be hedged to reduce volatility in future cash flows. These hedges normally consist of currency derivative contracts, which are matched against the underlying future cash flow according to maturity. Fortum has currency cash flow hedges both with and without hedge accounting treatment under IFRS. Those currency cash flow hedges, which do not qualify for hedge accounting are mainly hedging electricity derivatives. Unrealised hedges create volatility in the operating profit.
| 2014 | 2013 | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Invest | Invest | |||||
| EUR million | ment | Hedge | Open | ment | Hedge | Open |
| RUB | 2,109 | -198 | 1,911 | 3,187 | -317 | 2,870 |
| SEK | 1,964 | -364 | 1,600 | 1,303 | - | 1,303 |
| NOK | 580 | - | 580 | 440 | - | 440 |
| PLN | 152 | - | 152 | 138 | - | 138 |
| Other | 67 | - | 67 | 86 | - | 86 |
| Total | 4,872 | -562 | 4,310 | 5,154 | -317 | 4,837 |
Translation exposure position includes net investments in foreign subsidiaries and associated companies. On consolidation, exchange differences arising from the translation of the net investment in foreign entities are taken to equity. The net effect of exchange differences on equity attributable to equity holders mainly from RUB was EUR - 1,320 million in 2014 (2013: -471). Part of this translation exposure has been hedged and the hedge result amounted to EUR 149 million in 2014 (2013: 28).
| Notional amount | Fair value | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Remaining lifetimes | |||||||
| Under | 1-5 | Over 5 | |||||
| EUR million | 1 year | years | years | Total | Positive | Negative | Net |
| Forward foreign exchange contracts | 5,167 | 163 | - | 5,330 | 270 | 31 | 239 |
| Interest rate swaps | 508 | 3,282 | 1,931 | 5,721 | 360 | 206 | 154 |
| Interest rate and currency swaps | 362 | 1,111 | - | 1,473 | 233 | 0 | 233 |
| Forward rate agreements | - | - | - | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 6,037 | 4,556 | 1,931 | 12,524 | 863 | 237 | 626 |
| Of which long-term | 541 | 193 | 348 | ||||
| Short-term | 322 | 44 | 278 |
| Notional amount | Fair value | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Remaining lifetimes | |||||||
| Under | 1-5 | Over 5 | |||||
| EUR million | 1 year | years | years | Total | Positive | Negative | Net |
| Forward foreign exchange contracts | 7,092 | 420 | - | 7,513 | 76 | 49 | 27 |
| Interest rate swaps | 944 | 2,215 | 3,499 | 6,658 | 252 | 147 | 105 |
| Interest rate and currency swaps | - | 928 | - | 928 | 36 | 0 | 36 |
| Forward rate agreements | 56 | - | - | 56 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 8,092 | 3,563 | 3,499 | 15,155 | 365 | 196 | 170 |
| Of which long-term | 280 | 143 | 137 | ||||
| Short-term | 85 | 53 | 32 |
Fortum is exposed to credit risk whenever there is a contractual obligation with an external counterparty. Fortum has procedures in place to ensure that credit risks are kept at an acceptable level. All larger exposures are monitored centrally against limits which are approved according to authority levels defined in the Group Credit Instructions. Counterparty creditworthiness is continuously monitored and reported. Collaterals are used if dealing with counterparties without approved limits or when exposures arising from engagements are considered too high in relation to the counterparty creditworthiness. Parent company guarantees are requested when dealing with subsidiaries not considered creditworthy on a stand-alone basis.
Credit risk exposures relating to derivative instruments are often volatile due to rapidly changing market prices and are therefore monitored closely. Currency and interest rate derivative counterparties are limited to investment grade banks and financial institutions. ISDA Master agreements, which include netting clauses and in some cases collateral support agreements, are in place with most of these counterparties. The majority of the Group's commodity derivatives are cleared through an exchange such as NASDAQ OMX Commodities Europe. Some derivative transactions are also executed on the OTC market. These OTC counterparties are limited to those considered of high creditworthiness. Master agreements, such as ISDA, FEMA and EFET, which include netting clauses, are in place with the majority of the counterparties.
Fortum, like any capital intensive business, is exposed to credit risks in the financial sector. Credit risk relating to banks is monitored closely as the creditworthiness of financial institutions can deteriorate quickly. Where possible, exposures have been concentrated to key relationship banks considered to be of high credit quality and importance to the financial stability of their respective countries. In Russia, bank guarantees are used to cover exposures to suppliers related to the investment programme of OAO Fortum. In case a contractor defaults or does not fulfil its obligations, there are guarantees covering prepayments as well as performance guarantees in place. Issuers of these guarantees are banks with a strong local presence and understanding of the contractor. The creditworthiness of these banks as well as exposures arising from issued guarantees is monitored closely.
Credit risk relating to customers is well diversified over a large number of private individuals and businesses across several geographic regions and industry sectors. Russia, Finland and Sweden account for most of the exposure, of which exposure to Russia represents the highest risk of non-payment.
Amounts disclosed below are presented by counterparties for interest-bearing receivables including finance lease receivables, bank deposits and derivative financial instruments recognised as assets.
| 2014 | 2013 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EUR million | Carrying amount |
of which past due |
Carrying amount |
of which past due |
|
| Investment grade receivables | 3,505 | - | 1,555 | - | |
| Electricity exchanges | 75 | - | 185 | - | |
| Associated companies and joint ventures | 2,061 | - | 2,601 | - | |
| Other | 145 | - | 99 | - | |
| Total | 5,786 | - | 4,440 | - |
Investment grade receivables consist of deposits and Treasury bank accounts EUR 2,636 million (2013: 1,163), fair values of interest rate and currency derivatives EUR 859 million (2013: 362) and fair values of electricity, coal, oil and CO2 emission allowance derivatives EUR 10 million (2013: 30). Electricity exchange receivable is the fair value of derivatives on NASDAQ OMX Commodities Europe. Associated company and joint venture receivables consist of loan receivables EUR 2,041 million (2013: 2,587), fair values of interest rate and currency derivatives EUR 4 million (2013: 3) and fair values of electricity, coal, oil and CO2 emission allowance derivatives EUR 16 million (2013: 11). Other receivables consist of Russian deposits with non-investment grade banks EUR 63 million (2013: 0), loan and other interest bearing receivables EUR 4 million (2013: 14), finance lease receivables EUR 0 million (2013: 2) and fair values of electricity, coal, oil, and CO2 emission allowance derivatives EUR 78 million (2013: 83).
The following tables indicate how bank deposits and fair values of derivatives are distributed by rating class.
| EUR million | 2014 | 2013 |
|---|---|---|
| Counterparties with external credit rating from Standard & Poor's and/or Moody's Investment grade ratings | ||
| AAA | - | - |
| AA+/AA/AA- | 632 | 410 |
| A+/A/A- | 1,923 | 658 |
| BBB+/BBB/BBB- | 81 | 95 |
| Total investment grade ratings | 2,636 | 1,163 |
| BB+/BB/BB- | 63 | - |
| B+/B/B- | - | - |
| Below B- | - | - |
| Non-investment grade ratings | 63 | - |
| Counterparties without external credit rating from Standard & Poor's and/or Moody's | - | - |
| Total | 2,699 | 1,163 |
In addition, cash in other bank accounts totalled EUR 67 million on 31 December 2014 (2013: 102).
| 2014 | 2013 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EUR million | Recei vables |
Netted amount |
Recei vables |
Netted amount |
|
| Counterparties with external credit rating from Standard & Poor's and/or Moody's Investment grade ratings |
|||||
| AAA | - | - | - | - | |
| AA+/AA/AA- | 147 | 88 | 36 | 0 | |
| A+/A/A- | 712 | 560 | 308 | 220 | |
| BBB+/BBB/BBB- | - | - | 18 | - | |
| Total investment grade ratings | 859 | 648 | 362 | 220 | |
| Total associated companies and joint ventures | 4 | 4 | 3 | 3 | |
| Counterparties without external credit rating from Standard & Poor's and/or Moody's | - | - | - | - | |
| Total | 863 | 652 | 365 | 223 |
| 2014 | 2013 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Netted | Netted | |||
| EUR million Counterparties with external credit rating from Standard & Poor's and/or Moody's Investment |
Receivables | amount | Receivables | amount |
| grade ratings | ||||
| AAA | - | - | - | - |
| AA+/AA/AA- | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| A+/A/A- | 10 | 6 | 30 | 21 |
| BBB+/BBB/BBB- | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total investment grade ratings | 10 | 6 | 30 | 21 |
| Non-investment grade ratings | ||||
| BB+/BB/BB- | 6 | 6 | 8 | 7 |
| B+/B/B- | - | - | - | - |
| Below B- | - | - | - | - |
| Total non-investment grade ratings | 6 | 6 | 8 | 7 |
| Total associated companies and joint ventures | 16 | 5 | 11 | 2 |
| Counterparties without external credit rating from Standard & Poor's or Moody's | ||||
| Government or municipality | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Fortum Rating 5 - Lowest risk | 15 | 15 | 1 | 1 |
| Fortum Rating 4 - Low risk | 37 | 34 | 23 | 23 |
| Fortum Rating 3 - Normal risk | 18 | 17 | 47 | 46 |
| Fortum Rating 2 - High risk | 1 | 1 | - | - |
| Fortum Rating 1 - Highest risk | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 |
| No rating | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| Total non-rated counterparties | 72 | 68 | 75 | 73 |
| Total | 104 | 85 | 124 | 103 |
For derivatives, the receivable is the sum of the positive fair values, i.e the gross amount. Netted amount includes negative fair values where a valid netting agreement is in place with the counterparty. When the netted amount is less than zero, it is not included. In cases where a parent company guarantee is in place, the exposure is shown on the issuer of the guarantee.
All counterparties for currency and interest rate derivatives and the majority of counterparties for bank deposits have an external rating from Standard & Poor's and Moody's credit agencies. The above rating scale is for Standard & Poor's rating categories. For those counterparties only rated by Moody's, the rating has been translated to the equivalent Standard and Poor's rating category. For counterparties rated by both Standard & Poor's and Moody's, a conservative approach is taken by choosing the lower of the two ratings.
In the electricity, coal and oil derivatives market, there are a number of counterparties not rated by Standard & Poor's or Moody's. For these counterparties, Fortum assigns an internal rating. The internal rating is based on external credit ratings from other credit agencies. The rating from Soliditet is used for Finnish, Norwegian and Swedish counterparties and for other counterparties the rating from Dun & Bradstreet is used. Governments and municipal companies are typically not rated, and are shown separately. This rating category does not include companies owned by governments or municipalities. Counterparties that have not been assigned a rating by the above listed credit agencies are in the "No rating" category.
Fortum wants to have a prudent and efficient capital structure which at the same time allows the implementation of its strategy. Maintaining a strong balance sheet and the flexibility of the capital structure is a priority. The Group monitors the capital structure based on Comparable net debt to EBITDA ratio. Net debt is calculated as interest-bearing liabilities less cash and cash equivalents. EBITDA is calculated by adding back depreciation, amortisation and impairment charges to operating profit, whereas Comparable EBITDA is calculated by deducting items affecting comparability and net release of CSA provision from EBITDA. Fortum's net debt to EBITDA target is around 3.
Dividend policy ensures that shareholders receive a fair remuneration for their entrusted capital, supported by the company's long-term strategy that aims at increasing earnings per share and thereby the dividend. When proposing the dividend, the Board of Directors looks at a range of factors, including the macro environment, balance sheet strength as well as future investment plans. Fortum Corporation's target is to pay a stable, sustainable and over time increasing dividend, in the range of 50-80% of earnings per share, excluding one-off items.
Fortum Corporation's long-term credit rating with both S&P and Fitch remained unchanged during year 2014 and is A- (negative outlook).
| Net debt/EBITDA ratios | |
|---|---|
| ------------------------ | -- |
| EUR million | Note | 2014 | 2013 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Interest-bearing liabilities 1) | 28 | 6,983 | 9,058 |
| Less: Liquid funds 1) | 25 | 2,766 | 1,265 |
| Net debt | 4,217 | 7,793 | |
| Net debt without Värme financing | 3,664 | 6,658 | |
| Operating profit | 3,428 | 1,508 | |
| Add: Depreciation, amortisation and impairment charges | 526 | 621 | |
| EBITDA | 3,954 | 2,129 | |
| Less: Items affecting comparability | 2,077 | 106 | |
| Less: Net release of CSA provision | 4 | 48 | |
| Comparable EBITDA | 1,873 | 1,975 | |
| Net debt/EBITDA | 1.1 | 3.7 | |
| Comparable net debt/EBITDA | 2.3 | 3.9 | |
| Comparable net debt/EBITDA without Värme financing | 2.0 | 3.4 |
1) Including interest-bearing debt of EUR 0 million (2013: 20) and cash balances of EUR 0 million (2013: 15) classified as assets held for sale in balance sheet.
Fortum renewed its business structure as of 1 March 2014. After reorganisation Fortum's business operations are organised in five divisions and six corporate staff functions.
The business divisions are Hydro Power and Technology, Nuclear and Thermal Power, Heat, Electricity Sales and Solutions, Russia, and Distribution. The staff functions are Finance, Strategy and Mergers & Acquisitions, Legal, Human Resources and IT, Communications and Corporate Relations.
Fortum's reportable segments were also revised in connection with the reorganisation in March 2014. New reportable segments under IFRS include the business divisions Heat, Electricity Sales and Solutions, Russia and Distribution as well as the Power and Technology segment that consists of the Hydro Power and Technology and Nuclear and Thermal Power divisions.
Below is the description of the reportable segments:
Other segment includes mainly the shareholding in the associated company Hafslund ASA and corporate staff functions.
Financial target setting, follow up and allocation of resources in the group's performance management process is mainly based on the divisions' comparable operating profit including share of profit from associated companies and comparable return on net assets. Fortum discloses in the segment information operating profit, comparable operating profit, comparable EBITDA and share of profit from associated companies as well as return on net assets and comparable return on net assets.
Consolidation by segment is based on the same principles as for the Group as a whole.
| Segment information | Definition |
|---|---|
| Comparable operating profit and operating profit |
Comparable operating profit is reported to give a better view of each segment's performance. The difference between Comparable operating profit and Operating profit is that Comparable operating profit does not include "Items affecting comparability", which are: • non-recurring items, which mainly consist of capital gains and losses; • effects from fair valuations of derivatives hedging future cash flows which do not obtain hedge accounting status according to IAS 39. The major part of Fortum's cash flow hedges obtain hedge accounting where the fair value changes are recorded in equity; |
| See Note 7 Fair value changes of derivatives and underlying items in income statement. | |
| • effects from the accounting of Fortum's part of the State Nuclear Waste Management Fund where the assets in the balance sheet cannot exceed the related liabilities according to IFRIC 5. |
|
| See Note 30 Nuclear related assets and liabilities. | |
| Net assets | The segments' net assets consist primarily of non-interest-bearing assets and liabilities such as property, plant and equipment, intangible assets, participations in associated companies, inventories, operative related accruals and trade and other receivables and liabilities. Net assets also include Fortum's share of the State Nuclear Waste Management Fund, nuclear related provisions, pension and other provisions as well as assets and liabilities from fair valuations of derivatives hedging future cash flows which do not obtain hedge accounting status according to IAS 39. Interest-bearing receivables and liabilities and related accruals, current and deferred tax items, as well as assets and liabilities from fair valuations of derivatives hedging future cash flows which obtain hedge accounting status |
| according to IAS 39 are not allocated to the segments' net assets. | |
| Comparable net assets | In comparable net assets, segment's net assets are adjusted for assets and liabilities from fair valuations of derivatives hedging future cash flows which do not obtain hedge accounting status according to IAS 39 to be in line with comparable operating profit. |
| Gross investments in shares | Gross investments in shares include investments in subsidiary shares, shares in associated companies and other shares in available for sale financial assets. Investments in subsidiary shares are net of cash and grossed with interest-bearing liabilities in the acquired company. |
| Gross divestments in shares | Gross divestments in shares include divestments in subsidiary shares, shares in associated companies and other shares in available for sale financial assets. Divestments in subsidiary shares are net of cash and grossed with interest-bearing liabilities in the sold company. |
See also Financial key figures,
and Quarterly financial information.
Power and Technology segment sells its production to Nord Pool Spot and Electricity Sales buys its electricity from Nord Pool Spot. Eliminations of sales include eliminations of sales and purchases with Nord Pool Spot that are netted on group level on an hourly basis and posted either as revenue or cost depending on if Fortum is a net seller or net buyer during any particular hour. Inter-segment sales, expenses and results for the different business segments are affected by intra-group deliveries, which are eliminated on consolidation. Inter-segment transactions are based on commercial terms.
Income statement 2014
| Heat, Electricity |
|||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power and | Sales and | Distri | Netting and | ||||||
| EUR million | Note | Technology | Solutions | Russia | bution | Other | eliminations 1) | Total | |
| Sales | 2,156 | 1,332 | 1,055 | 751 | 58 | -601 | 4,751 | ||
| of which internal | 85 | 34 | 0 | 17 | 44 | -179 | 0 | ||
| External sales | 2,071 | 1,298 | 1,055 | 735 | 13 | -422 | 4,751 | ||
| Depreciation, amortisation and impairment |
-121 | -100 | -147 | -150 | -8 | - | -526 | ||
| Comparable EBITDA | 998 | 204 | 304 | 416 | -49 | - | 1,873 | ||
| Comparable operating profit | 877 | 104 | 161 | 266 | -57 | - | 1,351 | ||
| Non-recurring items | 6 | 52 | 254 | 0 | 1,865 | 0 | - | 2,171 | |
| Changes in fair values of | |||||||||
| derivatives hedging | |||||||||
| future cash-flow | 6 | 7 | -70 | -20 | 0 | 0 | 0 | - | -90 |
| Nuclear fund | |||||||||
| adjustment | 6 | 30 | -3 | - | - | - | - | - | -3 |
| Operating profit | 855 | 337 | 161 | 2,132 | -58 | - | 3,428 | ||
| Share of profit of associated | |||||||||
| companies and | |||||||||
| joint ventures | 20 | 30 | -14 | 88 | 35 | 3 | 37 | - | 149 |
| Finance costs - net | -217 | ||||||||
| Income taxes | -199 | ||||||||
| Profit for the year | 3,161 |
1) Netting and eliminations include eliminations of Group internal sales and netting of Nord Pool Spot transactions. Sales and purchases with Nord Pool Spot, EUR 422 million, are netted on Group level on an hourly basis and posted either as revenue or cost depending on if Fortum is a net seller or net buyer during any particular hour.
| EUR million | Power and Technology |
Heat, Electricity Sales and Solutions |
Russia | Distri bution |
Other | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Recognised impairment losses for trade receivables | 0 | -5 | -4 | -2 | 0 | -11 |
| Recognised impairment losses for intangible assets and property, plant and equipment |
-1 | -1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | -2 |
| Restructuring costs | -2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | -1 | -3 |
Impairment losses and restructuring costs are included in comparable operating profit.
| Heat, Electricity |
|||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EUR million | Power and Technology |
Sales and Solutions |
Russia | Distri bution |
Other | Eliminations | Total |
| Non-interest-bearing assets | 6,205 | 2,127 | 2,444 | 2,707 | 324 | -186 | 13,620 |
| Participations in associated companies and joint ventures |
859 | 523 | 326 | 0 | 319 | 0 | 2,027 |
| Assets included in Net assets |
7,064 | 2,650 | 2,769 | 2,707 | 643 | -186 | 15,647 |
| Interest-bearing receivables | 2,045 | ||||||
| Deferred taxes | 98 | ||||||
| Other assets | 818 | ||||||
| Liquid funds | 2,766 | ||||||
| Total assets | 21,375 | ||||||
| Liabilities included in Net assets |
1,063 | 538 | 172 | 92 | 147 | -186 | 1,827 |
| Deferred tax liabilities | 1,159 | ||||||
| Other liabilities | 470 | ||||||
| Total liabilities included in Capital employed |
3,456 | ||||||
| Interest-bearing liabilities | 6,983 | ||||||
| Total equity | 10,935 | ||||||
| Total equity and liabilities | 21,375 |
| EUR million | Note | Power and Technology |
Heat, Electricity Sales and Solutions |
Russia | Distri bution |
Other | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross investments in shares | 8 | 20 | 2 | 37 | 27 | 0 | 4 | 69 |
| Capital expenditure | 18, | 19 | 197 | 86 | 340 | 147 | 3 | 774 |
| of which capitalised |
||||||||
| borrowing costs | 3 | 1 | 43 | 0 | 0 | 47 | ||
| Gross divestments of shares | 67 | 446 | 0 | 2,681 | 2 | 3,196 |
| Net assets by segments EUR millon |
Return on net assets, % |
Comparable return on net assets, % |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Power and Technology | 6,001 | 13.6 | 14.2 |
| Heat, Electricity Sales and Solutions | 2,112 | 19.1 | 8.7 |
| Russia | 2,597 | 5.6 | 5.6 |
| Distribution | 2,615 | 73.6 | 9.3 |
| Other | 496 | -5.3 | -5.8 |
| Heat, Electricity |
||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power and | Sales and | Distri | ||||
| Technology | Solutions | Russia | bution | Other | Total | |
| Number of employees 31 Dec | 1,639 | 1,807 | 4,213 | 390 | 543 | 8,592 |
| Average number of employees | 1,685 | 1,913 | 4,196 | 492 | 536 | 8,821 |
Income statement 2013
| Heat, | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power and | Electricity Sales and |
Distri | Netting and | ||||||
| EUR million | Note | Technology | Solutions | Russia | bution | Other | eliminations 1) | Total | |
| Sales | 2,252 | 1,516 | 1,119 | 1,064 | 63 | -706 | 5,309 | ||
| of which internal | 69 | 87 | 0 | 19 | 54 | -228 | 0 | ||
| External sales | 2,184 | 1,430 | 1,119 | 1,045 | 9 | -478 | 5,309 | ||
| Depreciation, amortisation and | |||||||||
| impairment | -148 | -102 | -150 | -216 | -5 | - | -621 | ||
| Comparable EBITDA | 1,007 | 211 | 258 | 548 | -49 | - | 1,975 | ||
| Comparable operating profit | 859 | 109 | 156 | 332 | -54 | - | 1,403 | ||
| Non-recurring items | 6 | 25 | 18 | 0 | 17 | 1 | - | 61 | |
| Changes in fair values of | |||||||||
| derivatives hedging | |||||||||
| future cash-flow | 6, | 7 | 15 | 7 | 0 | 0 | - | 21 | |
| Nuclear fund adjustment | 6, | 30 | 23 | - | - | - | - | - | 23 |
| Operating profit | 922 | 134 | 156 | 349 | -53 | - | 1,508 | ||
| Share of profit of associated | |||||||||
| companies and | |||||||||
| joint ventures | 20, | 30 | 4 | 91 | 46 | 4 | 32 | - | 178 |
| Finance costs - net | -289 | ||||||||
| Income taxes | -186 | ||||||||
| Profit for the year | 1,212 |
1) Netting and eliminations include eliminations of Group internal sales and netting of Nord Pool Spot transactions. Sales and purchases with Nord Pool Spot, EUR 478 million, are netted on Group level on an hourly basis and posted either as revenue or cost depending on if Fortum is a net seller or net buyer during any particular hour.
| EUR million | Power and Technology |
Heat, Electricity Sales and Solutions |
Russia | Distri bution |
Other | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Recognised impairment losses for trade receivables | 0 | -4 | -18 | -2 | 0 | -23 |
| Recognised impairment losses for intangible assets and property, plant and equipment |
-24 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | -24 |
| Restructuring costs | 0 | -1 | 0 | 0 | -1 | -2 |
Impairment losses and restructuring costs are included in comparable operating profit.
Recognised impairment losses for property, plant and equipment in Power and Technology segment includes EUR 20 million impairment loss relating to the decision to discontinue electricity production at Inkoo power plant.
| Heat, Electricity |
|||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power and | Sales and | Distri | Elimina | ||||
| EUR million | Technology | Solutions | Russia | bution | Other | tions | Total |
| Non-interest-bearing assets | 6,470 | 2,268 | 3,687 | 4,219 | 99 | -293 | 16,449 |
| Participations in associated companies and | |||||||
| joint ventures | 896 | 592 | 463 | 52 | 339 | 0 | 2,341 |
| Assets included in | |||||||
| Net assets | 7,366 | 2,860 | 4,150 | 4,271 | 437 | -293 | 18,791 |
| Interest-bearing receivables | 2,477 | ||||||
| Deferred taxes | 126 | ||||||
| Other assets 1) | 704 | ||||||
| Liquid funds | 1,250 | ||||||
| Total assets | 23,348 | ||||||
| Liabilities included in | |||||||
| Net assets | 1,010 | 565 | 304 | 526 | 142 | -293 | 2,254 |
| Deferred tax liabilities | 1,338 | ||||||
| Other liabilities | 573 | ||||||
| Total liabilities included in | |||||||
| Capital employed | 4,166 | ||||||
| Interest-bearing liabilities 2) | 9,058 | ||||||
| Total equity | 10,124 | ||||||
| Total equity and liabilities | 23,348 |
1) Other assets at 31 December 2013 includes cash, EUR 15 million, included in Assets related to Assets held for sale.
2) Interest-bearing liabilities at 31 December 2013 includes interest-bearing liabilities, EUR 20 million, included in Liabilities related to Assets held for sale.
| EUR million | Note | Power and Technology |
Heat, Electricity Sales and Solutions |
Russia | Distri bution |
Other | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross investments in shares | 8 | 20 | 2 | 11 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 15 | |
| Capital expenditure | 18 | 19 | 179 | 123 | 435 | 255 | 12 | 1,005 | |
| of which capitalised borrowing costs |
2 | 2 | 55 | 0 | 0 | 60 | |||
| Gross divestments of shares | 79 | 11 | 0 | 52 | 0 | 142 |
| Net assets by segments EUR million |
Return on net assets, % |
Comparable return on net assets, % |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Power and Technology | 6,355 | 14.5 | 13.8 |
| Heat, Electricity Sales and Solutions | 2,295 | 9.7 | 8.7 |
| Russia | 3,846 | 5.2 | 5.2 |
| Distribution | 3,745 | 9.3 | 8.8 |
| Other | 295 | -8.5 | -6.9 |
3) Including assets and liabilities relating to Assets held for sale in 2013.
| Heat, Electricity |
||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power and | Sales and | Distri | ||||
| Technology | Solutions | Russia | bution | Other | Total | |
| Number of employees 31 Dec | 1,723 | 1,968 | 4,162 | 805 | 528 | 9,186 |
| Average number of employees | 1,900 | 2,051 | 4,245 | 786 | 550 | 9,532 |
The Group's operating segments operate mainly in the Nordic countries, Russia, Poland and other parts of the Baltic Rim area. Power and Technology as well as Distribution operate mainly in Finland and Sweden, whereas Heat, Electricity Sales and Solutions operates in all of these geographical areas except Russia. Other countries are mainly Latvia, Lithuania and the U.K. The home country is Finland.
The information below is disclosing sales by product area as well as sales by the country in which the customer is located. Assets, capital expenditure and personnel are reported where the assets and personnel are located. Participations in associates and joint ventures are not divided by location since the companies concerned can have business in several geographical areas.
| EUR million | 2014 | 2013 |
|---|---|---|
| Power sales excluding indirect taxes | 3,057 | 3,284 |
| Heat sales | 753 | 828 |
| Network transmissions | 710 | 1,024 |
| Other sales | 230 | 173 |
| Total | 4,751 | 5,309 |
Heat sales include sale of delivered heat and transmission of heat.
Due to the large number of customers and the variety of its business activities, there is no individual customer whose business volume is material compared with Fortum's total business volume.
| EUR million | 2014 | 2013 |
|---|---|---|
| Nordic | 3,197 | 3,685 |
| Russia | 1,056 | 1,121 |
| Poland | 223 | 206 |
| Estonia | 66 | 69 |
| Other countries | 210 | 228 |
| Total | 4,751 | 5,309 |
The Nordic power production is not split by countries since Nordic power production is mainly sold through Nord Pool Spot.
| EUR million | 2014 | 2013 |
|---|---|---|
| Finland | 163 | 239 |
| Sweden | 225 | 217 |
| Russia | 340 | 435 |
| Poland | 16 | 10 |
| Estonia | 8 | 16 |
| Norway | 3 | 13 |
| Other countries | 19 | 75 |
| Total | 774 | 1,005 |
| EUR million | 2014 | 2013 |
|---|---|---|
| Finland | 3,417 | 4,371 |
| Sweden | 7,005 | 7,427 |
| Russia | 2,444 | 3,687 |
| Poland | 342 | 352 |
| Estonia | 199 | 200 |
| Norway | 13 | 245 |
| Other countries | 387 | 461 |
| Eliminations | -186 | -293 |
| Non-interest bearing assets | 13,620 | 16,449 |
| Participations in associates and joint ventures | 2,027 | 2,341 |
| Total | 15,647 | 18,791 |
1) Including assets relating to Assets held for sale in 2013.
| 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|
| Finland | 2,040 | 2,477 |
| Sweden | 1,201 | 1,239 |
| Russia | 4,213 | 4,162 |
| Poland | 603 | 636 |
| Estonia | 206 | 210 |
| Norway | 34 | 141 |
| Other countries | 295 | 321 |
| Total | 8,592 | 9,186 |
| EUR million | 2014 | 2013 |
|---|---|---|
| Capital gains on disposals | 2,171 | 61 |
| Fair value changes on derivatives that do not qualify for hedge accounting | -91 | 21 |
| Nuclear fund adjustments | -3 | 23 |
| Total | 2,077 | 106 |
Items affecting comparability are exceptional items or unrealised items which fluctuate between the years. Items affecting comparability are disclosed separately in Fortum's income statement as they are necessary for understanding the financial performance when comparing results for the current period with previous periods. Items affecting comparability are not included in Comparable operating profit.
Capital gains in 2014 mainly include sales gains of EUR 1,85 billion from the sale of the Finnish electricity distribution business. The sales gain is recognised in Fortum's Distribution segment.
Capital gains also include the sales gains from selling Fortum's Norwegian electricity distribution and its heat businesses in Norway. The sales gains are booked in Fortum's Distribution segment, EUR 16 million, and Heat and Electricity Sales and Solutions segment, EUR 52 million.
Fortum recognised a sales gain from the sale of the UK-based subsidiary Grangemouth CHP. The sales gain was booked in Fortum's Power and Technology segment.
Capital gains include approximately EUR 190 million gain from sale of Fortum's 31%-shareholding in the Finnish natural gas company Gasum Oy. The sales gain is booked in Fortum's Heat, Electricity Sales and Solutions segment.
Capital gains in 2013 mainly include sales gains from finalising the sale of small hydropower plants in Sweden and sale of Fortums's 33% shareholding in Infratek ASA in Norway, both in Power segment. Sale of Fortum's 47.9% shareholding in Härjeåns Kraft AB in Sweden, in Distribution segment. Capital gains includes also gains related to divestment of the combined heat and power plants in Kuusamo and Kauttua, in Finland, and divestments of Fortum's 50% shares in Riihimäen Kaukolämpö Oy, in Finland, which are included in Heat segment.
Changes in the fair values of financial derivative instruments hedging future cash flows that do not qualify for hedge accounting are recognised in items affecting comparability. This is done to improve the understanding of the financial performance when comparing results from one period to another.
Nuclear fund adjustment includes effects from the accounting principle of Fortum´s part of the State Nuclear Waste Management Fund where the assets in the balance sheet cannot exceed the nuclear related provisions according to IFRIC 5. As long as the Fund is overfunded from an IFRS perspective, the effects to the operating profit from this adjustment will be positive if the provisions increase more than the Fund and negative if actual value of the fund increases more than the provisions.
For more information regarding disposals of shares, see Note 8 Acquisitions and disposals.
For more information regarding fair value changes of derivatives, see Note 7 Fair value changes of derivatives and underlying items in income statement. For more information regarding nuclear waste management, see Note 30 Nuclear related assets and liabilities.
Fair value changes in operating profit presented below are arising from financial derivatives hedging future cash flows where hedge accounting is not applied according to IAS 39 and the ineffectiveness from cash flow hedges.
Fair value changes of currency derivatives in net financial expenses are arising mainly from balance sheet hedges without hedge accounting status according to IAS 39, because they are natural hedges of loans and receivables. Fair value change of interest rate hedges without hedge accounting is EUR -13 million (2013: -16). The net effect of fair value changes of hedging derivative and hedged bonds are EUR 1 million (2013: 1).
| EUR million | 2014 | 2013 |
|---|---|---|
| In operating profit | ||
| Fair value changes from derivatives not getting hedge accounting status | ||
| Electricity derivatives | -56 | -2 |
| Currency derivatives | 8 | 15 |
| Coal and CO2 derivatives | -15 | -8 |
| Ineffectiveness from cash flow hedges | -28 | 16 |
| Total effect in operating profit | -91 | 21 |
| Fair value changes of derivatives not getting hedge accounting included in share of profit of associated companies |
0 | 3 |
| In finance costs | ||
| Exchange gains and losses on loans and receivables | -574 | -214 |
| Fair value changes of derivatives not getting hedge accounting status | ||
| Cross currency interest rate derivatives | 39 | 19 |
| Foreign currency derivatives | 536 | 195 |
| Rate difference on forward contracts | 8 | -1 |
| Currency derivatives | 583 | 213 |
| Interest rate derivatives | -13 | -16 |
| Fair value change of hedging derivatives in fair value hedge relationship | 67 | 25 |
| Fair value change of hedged items in fair value hedge relationship | -66 | -24 |
| Total 1) | 571 | 198 |
| Total effect in finance costs | -3 | -16 |
| Total effect on profit before income tax | -94 | 8 |
1) Including fair value gains and losses on financial instruments and exchange gains and losses on derivatives.
| EUR million | 2014 | 2013 |
|---|---|---|
| Power and Technology | 0 | 0 |
| Heat, Electricity Sales and Solutions | 0 | 10 |
| Russia | 6 | 0 |
| Distribution | 0 | 0 |
| Other | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 7 | 11 |
| EUR million | 2014 | 2013 |
|---|---|---|
| Finland | 0 | 0 |
| Sweden | 0 | 0 |
| Russia | 6 | 0 |
| Other countries | 0 | 11 |
| Total | 7 | 11 |
Gross investments in subsidiary shares consist of interest-bearing debt as well as paid cash according to purchase agreement added with direct costs relating to the acquisition less cash and cash equivalents in acquired subsidiary.
Total gross investments in shares amounted to EUR 69 million (2013: 15), of which investment in subsidiary shares EUR 7 million (2013: 11), shares in associated companies and joint ventures EUR 60 million (2013: 0) and available for sale financial assets EUR 2 million (2013: 4).
During 2014 Fortum has acquired additional shares in its associated company, Territorial Generating Company 1. After the acquisition Fortum owns 29.45% of the shares in TGC-1.
In July 2014, Fortum acquired E.ON Ruhrgas International GmbH's shareholding of 33.66% in the Estonian natural gas import, sales and distribution company AS Eesti Gaas and a similar shareholding in the gas transmission service company AS Võrguteenus Valdus. The acquired shares increased Fortum's holding in both companies to approximately 51%. The transaction was finalised during the third quarter of 2014. Fortum continues to account for its holdings in the Estonian natural gas businesses using the equity method.
There were no material investments in associated companies or joint ventures during 2013.
In November 2014 Fortum sold its 31 %-shareholding in the Finnish natural gas company Gasum Oy to the Finnish State. The sales price for the total amount of Fortum's shares was approximately EUR 310 million. Fortum booked a gain of roughly EUR 190 million, corresponding to approximately EUR 0.22 per share. The sales gain is booked in 2014 fourth quarter results of Fortum's Heat, Electricity Sales and Solutions segment.
In October 2014 Fortum sold its UK-based subsidiary Grangemouth CHP Limited to its long term customer INEOS Industries Holdings Ltd. Grangemouth CHP Limited owns and operates a natural gas-fired combined heat and power (CHP) plant located at Grangemouth in Scotland. The total sales price was approximately GBP 54 million (corresponding to approximately EUR 70 million). Fortum booked a gain in 2014 fourth quarter results of Fortum's Power and Technology segment.
In April 2014 Fortum agreed to sell its Norwegian electricity distribution to the Hafslund Group, listed on the Oslo Stock Exchange, and its heat businesses in Norway to iCON Infrastructure Partners II, L.P. fund. In addition, Fortum agreed to sell its shareholding in Fredrikstad Energi AS (49%) and Fredrikstad Energi Nett AS (35%) to the Hafslund Group. The total consideration was approximately EUR 340 million on a debt- and cash-free basis. The sales gains are booked in Fortum's Distribution segment, EUR 16 million, and Heat and Electricity Sales and Solutions segment, EUR 52 million in the second quarter 2014 results. The one time sales gains correspond to approximately EUR 0.08 per share.
In January 2014 Fortum agreed to sell its 30%-stake in the Swedish power company Karlshamns Kraft AB to the company's majority owner E.ON. The sale has a minor impact on Power and Technology segment's first quarter 2014 results.
In December 2013 Fortum announced that it had agreed to sell its Finnish electricity distribution business to Suomi Power Networks Oy, owned by a consortium of Finnish and international investors. The total consideration is EUR 2.55 billion on a debt- and cash-free basis. Fortum booked a one-time sales gain of EUR 1.85 billion corresponding to EUR 2.08 per share. The sales gain was reported in Fortum's Distribution segment in the first quarter of 2014.
During 2013 Fortum divested small hydropower plants in Sweden and a minor gain was recognised in the Power and Technology segment.
In June 2013, Fortum agreed to sell its 47.9% ownership in the Swedish energy company Härjeåns Kraft AB to the Finnish energy company Oy Herrfors Ab, a subsidiary of Katternö Group. The sales price was SEK 445 million (approximately EUR 51 million). The transaction was completed in July and a capital gain of EUR 17 million was booked to Distribution segment's third quarter results.
In July 2013 Fortum completed the divestment of its 33% holding in Infratek ASA to a fund managed by Triton. The sales price was NOK 295 million (approximately EUR 38 million). A capital gain of EUR 11 million was booked in the Power and Technology segment's third quarter results.
During fourth quarter 2013 there were several divestments that had a minor effect to Heat, Electricity Sales and Solutions segment's results. In November 2013 Fortum sold its 50% ownership in the Finnish district heating company Riihimäen Kaukolämpö Oy to the City of Riihimäki (40%) and to Riihimäen Kaukolämpö Oy (10%).
In December 2013 Fortum sold its Kauttua combined heat and power (CHP) plant in Eura, Finland to the Finnish energy company Adven Oy. Also in December 2013 Fortum sold its CHP plant as well as its natural gas and district heating network in the town of Nokia to Leppäkosken Sähkö Oy. Furthermore Fortum's Uimaharju CHP plant ownership was transferred to Stora Enso on 31 December 2013 according to an earlier agreement signed in 1990.
| EUR million | 2014 | 2013 |
|---|---|---|
| Divestment of subsidiaries 1) | ||
| Intangible assets and Property, plant and equipment | 1,342 | 30 |
| Other non-current and current assets | 204 | 3 |
| Liquid funds | 10 | 1 |
| Interest-bearing loans | -131 | -22 |
| Other liabilities and provisions | -622 | -3 |
| Non-controlling interests | - | - |
| Gain on sale | 1,958 | 12 |
| Sales price received | 2,761 | 21 |
| Less proceeds not yet settled in cash | 2 | -2 |
| Less liquid funds | 10 | 1 |
| Sales price for the shares (net of cash) | 2,750 | 22 |
| Proceeds from interest-bearing receivables | 131 | 22 |
| Proceeds not yet settled in cash | 2 | -2 |
| Total | 2,884 | 42 |
| Divestments in associated companies | 311 | 100 |
| Divestments of available for sale financial assets | 1 | 0 |
| Gross divestment of shares | 3,196 | 142 |
1) Divestments of subsidiaries include assets and liabilities that were classified as Assets held for sale in the balance sheet as of December 2013.
As of 31 December 2014 there were no Assets held for sale.
The assets and liabilities relating to Finnish distribution business have been classified as assets held for sale in the balance sheet as of 31 December 2013. Fortum signed in December 2013 an agreement to sell its electricity distribution business in Finland to Suomi Power Networks Oy, which is owned by a consortium of Finnish pension funds Keva (12.5%) and Local Tapiola Pension (7.5%) together with international infrastructure investors First State Investments (40%) and Borealis Infrastructure (40%).
| EUR million | 2014 | 2013 |
|---|---|---|
| Intangible assets and property, plant and equipment | - | 1,116 |
| Other assets | - | 42 |
| Cash and cash equivalents | - | 15 |
| Total | - | 1,173 |
| EUR million | 2014 | 2013 |
|---|---|---|
| Interest-bearing liabilities | - | 20 |
| Deferred tax liabilities | - | 141 |
| Connection fees | - | 306 |
| Other liabilities | - | 73 |
| Total | - | 540 |
1) Amounts are presented net of internal balances with other Fortum subsidiaries, such as internal financing amounting to EUR 0 million (2013: 61).
The Finnish distribution operations are included in the segment information presented in Note 5. The impact of Finnish distribution business to Distribution segment's comparable operating profit for 2013 was EUR 73 million. Additional information of the impact to segment information is presented in the table below:
| Distribution segment 2013 |
|||
|---|---|---|---|
| Distribution | without Finnish | ||
| EUR million segment 2013 |
operations | Impact 1) | |
| Comparable EBITDA | 548 | 408 | -140 |
| Comparable operating profit | 332 | 259 | -73 |
| Operating profit | 349 | 272 | -77 |
| Share of profits in associates and joint ventures | 4 | 6 | 2 |
| Depreciation and amortisation | 216 | 149 | -67 |
| Capital expenditure | 255 | 129 | -126 |
| Assets (at period end) | 4,271 | 3,064 | -1,206 |
| Liabilities (at period end) | 526 | 141 | -385 |
| Net assets (at period end) | 3,745 | 2,923 | -821 |
| Comparable return on net assets, % | 8.8 | 8.8 | -0.1 |
| Return on net assets, % | 9.3 | 9.3 | -0.1 |
| Number of employees (at period end) | 805 | 477 | -328 |
| Volume of distributed electricity, TWh | 26.1 | 16.6 | -9.5 |
| Number of electricity distribution customers, thousands | 1,648 | 1,006 | -642 |
1)Impact as consolidated to Fortum Group figures for 2013.
For more information see Note 8 Acquisitions and disposals.
| EUR million | 2014 | 2013 |
|---|---|---|
| Rental income | 10 | 14 |
| Insurance compensation | 8 | 3 |
| Other items | 57 | 76 |
| Total | 75 | 93 |
In 2013 Fortum received EUR 40 million in compensation for CSA penalties from E4, the general contractor of the Nyagan power plant, which is included in other items in the table above.
No gains booked for sale of emission rights in 2014 nor 2013. Costs for made emissions which are not covered by emission rights received for free were EUR 8 million (2013: 9). The costs are included in Materials and services.
| EUR million | 2014 | 2013 |
|---|---|---|
| Operation and maintenance costs | 131 | 167 |
| Property taxes | 159 | 170 |
| IT and telecommunication costs | 64 | 68 |
| Other items | 242 | 243 |
| Total | 596 | 648 |
The major components recorded in other expenses are the external operation and maintenance costs of power and heat plants and of transmission lines. Property taxes include property taxes relating to directly owned hydropower production EUR 132 million (2013: 138).
| EUR million | 2014 | 2013 |
|---|---|---|
| Audit fees | 1.4 | 1.4 |
| Audit related assignments | 0.1 | 0.2 |
| Tax assignments | 0.2 | 0.0 |
| Total | 1.8 | 1.6 |
Deloitte is the appointed auditor until the next Annual General Meeting, to be held in 2015. Audit fees include fees for the audit of the consolidated financial statements, review of the interim reports as well as the fees for the audit of Fortum Oyj and its subsidiaries. Audit related assignments include fees for assurance of sustainability reporting and other assurance and associated services related to the audit. Tax assignments include fees for tax advice services.
| EUR million | 2014 | 2013 |
|---|---|---|
| Materials | 1,224 | 1,405 |
| Materials purchased from associated companies and joint ventures | 568 | 657 |
| Transmission costs | 134 | 194 |
| External services | 13 | 14 |
| Total | 1,939 | 2,270 |
Materials consists mainly of coal, gas and nuclear fuels used for producing power and heat.
Materials purchased from associated companies consist of nuclear and hydropower purchased at production cost (including interest costs and production taxes), purchased fuels used in CHP production and purchased steam.
Total materials and services include production taxes and duties EUR 129 million (2013: 148), of which nuclear related capacity and property taxes EUR 81 million (2013: 92) and hydro power related property taxes EUR 14 million (2013: 14). Taxes related to nuclear and hydro production include taxes paid through purchases from associated companies.
See Note 20 Participations in associated companies and joint ventures.
| EUR million | 2014 | 2013 |
|---|---|---|
| Wages and salaries | 298 | 336 |
| Pensions | ||
| Defined contribution plans | 32 | 33 |
| Defined benefit plans | 7 | 6 |
| Social security costs | 52 | 59 |
| Share-based remunerations | 8 | 7 |
| Other employee costs | 15 | 19 |
| Total | 413 | 460 |
The compensation package for Fortum employees consists of a combination of salaries, fringe benefits, short-term incentives, profit sharing paid to the Personnel Fund and share-based long-term incentives. The majority of Fortum employees are included in a performance bonus system. The long-term incentive schemes are intended for senior executives and other management of the Fortum Group.
The remuneration policy is determined by the Board of Directors. The Nomination and Remuneration Committee discusses, assesses and makes recommendations and proposals to the Board of Directors on the remuneration policy, pay structures, bonus and incentive systems for the Group and its management, and contributes to the Group's nomination issues.
For further information on pensions see Note 32 Pension obligations.
Fortum's short-term incentive scheme, i.e. bonus system, supports the realisation of the Group's financial performance targets, sustainability targets, values and structural changes. The system ensures that the performance targets of individual employees align with the targets of the division and the Group. All Fortum employees, with the exception of certain personnel groups in Poland and Russia, are covered by the bonus system.
The criteria used in determining the size of the bonus for senior management (the President and CEO and other members of the Fortum Executive Management Team) are decided annually by the Board of Directors on the recommendation of the Board's Nomination and Remuneration Committee. The size of each senior executive's bonus is dependent on the Group's financial performance, as well as on their own success in reaching personal goals. The performance bonus criteria may also include indicators related to sustainability targets. The maximum bonus level for the senior management is 40% of the executive's annual salary including fringe benefits.
For executives with division responsibilities, the bonus system reflects the performance of their division together with the Group's financial performance. The criteria for evaluating an executive's personal performance are mutually agreed between the executive and his/her superior in an annual performance discussion at the beginning of each year. The performance of the President and CEO is evaluated annually by the Board of Directors.
At present, approximately 120 managers, all of whom have been elected by the Board of Directors, are participants in at least one of the five on-going annual LTI plans (plans 2010-2015, 2011-2016, 2012-2017, 2013-2018 and 2014-2019).
The expense recorded as employee costs for the period was EUR 8 million (2013: 7). The LTI liability including social charges at the end of the year 2014 was EUR 9 million (2013: 8), including EUR 1 million (2013: 1) recorded in equity.
| Share bonus system | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Plan 2011-2016 |
Plan 2010-2015 |
Plan 2009-2013 |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Grant date | 14.2.2014 | 13.2.2013 | 8.2.2012 |
| Grant price, EUR | 16.62 | 13.90 | 18.16 |
| Number of shares granted | 101,753 | 187,493 | 165,132 |
| Number of shares subsequently forfeited or | |||
| released from lock-up | -9,667 | -19,107 | -165,132 |
| Number of shares under lock-up at the end of the year 2014 | 92,086 | 168,386 | 0 |
| Fortum share price at the end of the grant year, EUR | 17.97 | 16.63 | 14.15 |
In addition to the shares granted above, share rights have been granted to participants that will receive cash payments instead of shares after the lock-up period. The gross amount of share rights outstanding at the end of the year 2014 for plan 2011-2016 was 63,402 share rights and for plan 2010-2015 99,228 share rights.
In addition 16,423 shares were delivered for plan 2008-2012 in 2014.
The Fortum Personnel Fund (for employees in Finland only) has been in operation since year 2000. The Board of Directors determines the criteria for the fund's annual profit-sharing bonus. Persons included in Fortum's long-term incentive schemes are not eligible to be members of this fund. Members of the personnel fund are the permanent and fixed-term employees of the Group. The membership of employees joining the company starts at the beginning of the next month after the employment relationship has been ongoing for five months. An employee is entitled to make withdrawals right from the beginning of the membership.The membership in the fund terminates when the member has received his/her share of the fund in full.
The profit-sharing received by the fund is distributed equally between the members. Each employee's share is divided into a tied amount and an amount available for withdrawal. It is possible to transfer a maximum of 15% of capital from the tied amount to the amount available for withdrawal each year.
The amount available for withdrawal (maximum 15% of the tied amount) is decided each year by the council of the fund and it is paid to members who want to exercise their withdrawal rights.
The fund's latest financial year ended at 30 April 2014 and the fund then had a total of 2,635 members (2013: 2,722). At the end of April 2014 Fortum contributed EUR 0.4 million (2013: 2.8) to the personnel fund as an annual profit-sharing bonus based on the financial results of 2013. The combined amount of members' shares in the fund was EUR 22 million (2013: 23).
The contribution to the personnel fund is expensed as it is earned.
The Fortum Executive Management Team (FEM) consists of twelve members (previously nine members), including the President and CEO. The following table presents the total remuneration of the President and CEO and the Fortum Executive Management Team and takes into account the changes in FEM during the year. The expenses are shown on accrual basis.
Additional information about cash based remuneration is available in section Remuneration.
| 2014 | 2013 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EUR thousands | The President and CEO |
Other FEM members |
The President and CEO 1) |
Other FEM members 2) |
| Salaries and fringe benefits | 1,005 | 3,321 | 795 | 2,860 |
| Performance bonuses 3) | 127 | 511 | 22 | 197 |
| Share-based remuneration | 235 | 1,018 | 448 | 1,122 |
| Pensions (statutory) | 188 | 594 | 137 | 494 |
| Pensions (voluntary) | 255 | 803 | 204 | 695 |
| Social security expenses | 57 | 219 | 48 | 337 |
| Total | 1,867 | 6,465 | 1,654 | 5,705 |
1) Amount is impacted by the sick leave during 2013.
2) Including compensation of EUR 80,000 paid to former CFO Rauramo for assuming the duties of the President and CEO during March-November 2013.
3) Performance bonuses are based on estimated amounts.
The annual contribution for the President and CEO's pension arrangement is 25% of the annual salary. The annual salary consists of a base salary, fringe benefits and bonus. The President and CEO Tapio Kuula's retirement age is 63. In case his assignment is terminated before the retirement age, the President and CEO is entitled to retain the benefits accrued in the arrangement for his benefit.
For other management team members the retirement age is 60 - 65 depending on the arrangement. The pension paid is maximum 66% or 60% of the remuneration upon retirement. In the first case they are defined benefit pension plans and are provided by Fortum's pension fund. In the latter, pensions are either defined benefit or defined contribution schemes and insured by an insurance company.
A pension liability of EUR 2,514 thousand (2013: 1,566) related to the defined benefit plans for management team members has been recognised in the balance sheet.The additional pension arrangement for the President and CEO is a defined contribution pension plan and thus no liability has been recognised in the balance sheet.
In the event that Fortum decides to give notice of termination to the President and CEO, he is entitled to salary of the notice period (6 months) and to severance pay equal to 18 months' salary. Other FEM members' termination compensation is equal to 12 to 24 months' salary.
Additional information about the terms and conditions of the remuneration of the President and CEO is available online at www.fortum.com/en/corporation/ corporate-governance/remuneration-board/employment-terms-conditions-president-ceo/pa
The table below shows the number of shares delivered during 2014 and 2013 to the President and CEO and other FEM members under the LTI arrangements. Shares delivered under the plans are subject to a lock-up period under which they cannot be sold or transferred to a third party.
| 2014 2) | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|
| FEM members at 31 December 2014 | ||
| Tapio Kuula | 15,187 | 35,152 |
| Helena Aatinen | 909 | 519 |
| Alexander Chuvaev 1) | 13,793 | 35,783 |
| Mikael Frisk | 6,463 | 10,079 |
| Esa Hyvärinen (member of the FEM as of 1 March 2014) | 1,382 | n/a |
| Timo Karttinen | 6,639 | 9,563 |
| Kari Kautinen (member of the FEM as of 1 March 2014) | 1,739 | n/a |
| Per Langer | 5,517 | 8,550 |
| Markus Rauramo | 1,679 | 756 |
| Matti Ruotsala | 3,463 | 12,395 |
| Sirpa-Helena Sormunen (member of the FEM as of 1 September 2014) | 0 | n/a |
| Tiina Tuomela (member of the FEM as of 1 March 2014) | 1,156 | n/a |
| Kaarina Ståhlberg (member of the FEM until 31 March 2014) | 210 | n/a |
| Total | 58,137 | 112,797 |
1) Share rights will be paid in cash instead of shares after the three-year lock-up period due to local legislation.
2) Share delivery based on share plans 2008-2012 and 2011-2016.
On 31 December 2014, the members of the Board of Directors owned a total of 10,950 shares (2013: 10,950), which corresponds to 0.00% (2013: 0.00%) of the company's shares and voting rights.
| 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|
| Board members at 31 December 2014 | ||
| Sari Baldauf, Chairman | 2,300 | 2,300 |
| Kim Ignatius, Deputy Chairman (from 8 April 2014) | 2,400 | 2,400 |
| Minoo Akhtarzand | - | - |
| Heinz-Werner Binzel | - | - |
| Ilona Ervasti-Vaintola | 4,000 | 4,000 |
| Christian Ramm-Schmidt (Deputy Chairman until 8 April 2014) | 2,250 | 2,250 |
| Petteri Taalas (member of the Board from 8 April 2014) | - | n/a |
| Jyrki Talvitie (member of the Board from 8 April 2014) | - | n/a |
| Total | 10,950 | 10,950 |
The President and CEO and other members of the Fortum Executive Management Team owned a total of 430,457 shares (2013: 346,106) which corresponds to approximately 0.05% (2013: 0.04%) of the company's shares and voting rights.
| 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|
| FEM members at 31 December 2014 | ||
| Tapio Kuula | 168,742 | 153,555 |
| Helena Aatinen | 1,528 | 619 |
| Alexander Chuvaev | 14,713 | 12,093 |
| Mikael Frisk | 46,591 | 42,128 |
| Esa Hyvärinen (member of the FEM from 1 March 2014) | 15,156 | n/a |
| Timo Karttinen | 76,430 | 69,791 |
| Kari Kautinen (member of the FEM from 1 March 2014) | 22,276 | n/a |
| Per Langer | 30,784 | 25,267 |
| Markus Rauramo | 15,435 | 13,756 |
| Matti Ruotsala | 32,360 | 28,897 |
| Sirpa-Helena Sormunen (member of the FEM from 1 September 2014) | - | n/a |
| Tiina Tuomela (member of the FEM from 1 March 2014) | 6,442 | n/a |
| Total | 430,457 | 346,106 |
The Board of Directors comprises five to eight members who are elected at the Annual General Meeting for a one-year term of office, which expires at the end of the first Annual General Meeting following the election. At the 2014 Annual General Meeting eight members were elected.
The Annual General meeting confirms the yearly compensation for the Board of Directors. Board members are not offered any long-term incentive benefits or participation in other incentive schemes. There are no pension arrangements for the Board members. Social security costs EUR 12 thousand (2013: 13) have been recorded for the fees in accordance with local legislation in respective countries.
| EUR thousands | 2014 | 2013 |
|---|---|---|
| Chairman | 75 | 75 |
| Deputy Chairman | 57 | 57 |
| Chairman of the Audit and Risk Committee 1) | 57 | 57 |
| Members | 40 | 40 |
1) If not Chairman or Deputy Chairman simultaneously.
In addition, a fee of EUR 600 is paid for each Board and Board Committee meeting. The fee is doubled for Board members living outside of Finland in Europe, and tripled for Board members living outside of Europe. The members are entitled to travel expense compensation in accordance with the company's travel policy.
| EUR thousands | 2014 | 2013 |
|---|---|---|
| Board members at 31 December 2014 | ||
| Sari Baldauf, Chairman | 83 | 84 |
| Kim Ignatius, Deputy Chairman (from 8 April 2014) | 67 | 67 |
| Minoo Akhtarzand | 57 | 58 |
| Heinz-Werner Binzel | 60 | 60 |
| Ilona Ervasti-Vaintola | 48 | 49 |
| Christian Ramm-Schmidt (Deputy Chairman until 8 April 2014) | 53 | 66 |
| Petteri Taalas (member of the Board from 8 April 2014) | 37 | - |
| Jyrki Talvitie (member of the Board from 8 April 2014) | 53 | - |
| Former Board member | ||
| Joshua Larson (member of the Board until 8 April 2014) | 19 | 71 |
| Total | 477 | 455 |
| EUR million | Note | 2014 | 2013 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Interest expense | |||
| Borrowings | -303 | -361 | |
| Other interest expense | 0 | -1 | |
| Capitalised borrowing costs | 19 | 47 | 60 |
| Total | -256 | -301 | |
| Interest income | |||
| Loan receivables and deposits | 82 | 72 | |
| Other interest income | 2 | 3 | |
| Total | 84 | 75 | |
| Fair value gains and losses on financial instruments | 7 | ||
| Fair value change of interest rate derivatives not getting hedge accounting status | -13 | -16 | |
| Fair value change of hedging derivatives in fair value hedge relationship | 67 | 25 | |
| Fair value change of hedged items in fair value hedge relationship | -66 | -24 | |
| Rate difference on forward contracts | 8 | -1 | |
| Total | -5 | -16 | |
| Exchange gains and losses | |||
| Loans and receivables | 7 | -574 | -214 |
| Cross currency interest rate derivatives | 7 | 39 | 19 |
| Foreign currency derivatives | 7 | 536 | 195 |
| Interest income on share of State Nuclear Waste Management Fund | 30 | 11 | 9 |
| Unwinding of discount on nuclear provisions | 30 | -43 | -35 |
| Unwinding of discount on other provisions 31, |
32 | -7 | -16 |
| Other financial income | 2 | 2 | |
| Other financial expenses | -5 | -7 | |
| Total | -40 | -47 | |
| Finance costs - net | -217 | -289 |
Interest expenses include interest expenses on interest-bearing loans, interest on interest rate and currency swaps and forward points on forward foreign exchange contracts hedging loans and receivables.
Further information can be found in the Notes mentioned in the table.
Interest income includes EUR 31 million (2013: 29) from shareholders' loans in Finnish and Swedish nuclear companies, EUR 27 million (2013: 33) from Fortum Värme and EUR 19 million (2013: 6) from deposits.
Fair value gains and losses on financial instruments include change in clean price of interest rate and cross currency swaps not getting hedge accounting and fair value changes of interest rate derivatives in hedge relationship and hedged items. Accrued interest on these derivatives is entered in interest expenses of borrowings. Fair value gains and losses include also rate difference from forward contracts hedging loans and receivables without hedge accounting.
Exchange gains and losses includes exchange rate differences arising from valuation of foreign currency loans and receivables and exchange rate differences from forward foreign exchange contracts and interest rate and currency swaps.
| EUR million | 2014 | 2013 |
|---|---|---|
| Interest rate and cross currency swaps | ||
| Interest expenses on borrowings | 6 | 18 |
| Exchange rate difference from derivatives | 39 | 19 |
| Rate difference in fair value gains and losses on financial instruments 1) | 54 | 9 |
| Total fair value change of interest rate derivatives in finance costs - net | 99 | 46 |
| Forward foreign exchange contracts | ||
| Interest expenses on borrowings | -80 | -89 |
| Exchange rate difference from derivatives | 536 | 195 |
| Rate difference in fair value gains and losses on financial instruments | 8 | -1 |
| Total fair value change of currency derivatives in finance costs - net | 464 | 105 |
| Total fair value change of interest and currency derivatives in finance costs - net | 563 | 151 |
1) Fair value gains and losses on financial instruments include fair value changes from interest rate swaps not getting hedge accounting amounting to EUR -13 million (2013: -16) and fair value change of hedging derivatives in fair value hedge relationship EUR 67 million (2013: 25), totalling EUR 54 million (2013: 9).
| EUR million | 2014 | 2013 |
|---|---|---|
| Finnish companies | 2,421 | 440 |
| Swedish companies | 287 | 375 |
| Other companies | 652 | 583 |
| Total | 3,360 | 1,398 |
| EUR million | 2014 | 2013 |
|---|---|---|
| Current taxes | ||
| Finnish companies | -87 | -104 |
| Swedish companies | -57 | -54 |
| Other companies | -48 | -46 |
| Total | -192 | -203 |
| Deferred taxes | ||
| Finnish companies | 15 | 81 |
| Swedish companies | 23 | -8 |
| Other companies | -34 | -56 |
| Total | 5 | 17 |
| Adjustments recognised for current tax of prior periods | ||
| Finnish companies | -6 | -1 |
| Swedish companies | 0 | 0 |
| Other companies | -5 | 1 |
| Total | -11 | 0 |
| Total income taxes | -199 | -186 |
Financial Statements
The table below explains the difference between the theoretical enacted tax rate in Finland compared to the effective income tax rate in the income statement.
| EUR million | 2014 | % | 2013 | % |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Profit before tax | 3,360 | 1,398 | ||
| Tax calculated at nominal Finnish tax rate | -672 | 20.0 | -343 | 24.5 |
| Tax rate changes | 0 | 0.0 | 79 | -5.7 |
| Differences in tax rates and regulations | 5 | -0.2 | 53 | -3.8 |
| Income not subject to tax | 0 | 0.0 | 2 | -0.2 |
| Tax exempt capital gains | 438 | -13.0 | 12 | -0.9 |
| Expenses not deductible for tax purposes | -2 | 0.0 | -7 | 0.5 |
| Share of profit of associated companies and joint ventures | 34 | -1.0 | 40 | -2.9 |
| Taxes related to dividend distributions | -3 | 0.1 | 0 | 0.0 |
| Changes in tax valuation allowance related to not recognised | ||||
| tax losses | 0 | 0.0 | -19 | 1.4 |
| Other items | 7 | -0.2 | -3 | 0.2 |
| Adjustments recognised for taxes of prior periods | -6 | 0.2 | -1 | 0.1 |
| Tax charge in the income statement | -199 | 5.9 | -186 | 13.3 |
Key tax indicators:
The weighted average applicable income tax rate for 2014 is 20.5% (2013: 22.5%)
The effective income tax rate in the income statement for 2014 is 5.9% (2013: 13.3%)
The effective income tax rate excluding the share of profits from associates and joint ventures, tax exempt capital gains and tax rate changes for 2014 is 18.8% (2013: 22.7%)
The total tax rate for 2014 is 14.3% (2013 31.8%)
The total tax rate excluding the share of profits from associates and joint ventures and tax exempt capital gains for 2014 is 38.2% (2013: 36.6%)
Effective income tax rate and effective total tax rate are effected by gains or losses on sale of shares. Many countries like Finland, Sweden and Netherlands have exempted income on capital gains and losses from income tax purposes. With this countries aim to tax the operative income of the company and avoid taxing the same income twice in case of the sale of the shares. Taxation of capital gains or losses is in line with the taxation of dividend income.
One time tax exempt capital gains from divestments during 2014 reduced the effective income tax rate with 13%.
In December 2013 the Finnish Parliament passed legislation lowering the income tax rate from 24.5% to 20%. The one-time positive effect in 2013 in the income tax cost from the tax rate change was approximately EUR 79 million.
Fortum has a material deferred tax liability owing to its investments in non current assets. These assets are depreciated more rapidly for tax than for accounting purposes resulting in lower current tax payments at the start of an assets' lifetime and higher tax payments at the end of its lifetime. This difference results in a deferred tax liability, which is valued using the tax rate expected to be in force when the liability unwinds.
Fortum has current income taxes in 2014 totalling EUR 203 million (2013: 203). The effective income tax rate indicates tax burden taking into account the differences between accounting and tax rules, including tax exempt capital gains, tax rate changes and other differences. The effective tax rate may therefore fluctuate even though current income taxes are stable.
Taxes borne indicate different taxes that Fortum pays for the period. In 2014 Fortum's taxes borne were EUR 525 million (2013: 558). Taxes borne include corporate income taxes, production taxes, employment taxes, taxes on property and cost of indirect taxes. Production taxes include also production taxes and taxes on property paid through electricity purchased from associated companies. The total tax rate indicates the burden on taxes borne by Fortum from its profit before these taxes.
Total taxes borne in relation to segment assets by location was in 2014 in Finland 4.6% (2013: 4.0%), in Sweden 4.0% (2013: 4.0%) and Other countries 2.8% (2013: 1.9%). The indicator reflects how much the Total taxes borne are in relation to the segment assets in a country. Total taxes borne in relation to sales volumes was in 2014 in Finland EUR 6.3 million per TWh (2013: 6.0), in Sweden EUR 9.9 million per TWh (2013: 12.7) and Other countries EUR 1.4 million per TWh (2013: 1.4).
For group internal long term financing Fortum has financing companies in the Netherlands, Belgium, Luxembourg and Ireland. Fortum group financing companies' total taxes borne were in 2014 EUR 40 million (2013: 36) and total tax rate was 13.2% (2013: 12.4%). Total taxes borne in relation to net interest bearing receivables and liabilities was in 2014 0.4% (2013: 0.3%), which reflects the current low interest levels.
In addition, Fortum administers and collects different taxes on behalf of governments and authorities. Such taxes include VAT, and excise taxes on power consumed by customers, payroll taxes and withholding taxes. The amount of taxes collected by Fortum was EUR 527 million (2013: 700).
Fortum has had several tax audits ongoing during 2014. Fortum has received income tax assessments in Sweden for the years 2009-2012, in Belgium for the years 2008 -2011 as well as in Finland regarding the year 2007. Fortum has appealed all assessments received. Based on legal analysis, no provision has been accounted for in the financial statements related to tax audits.
See also Note 29 Deferred income taxes,
Note 11 Materials and services and
Operating and financial review; Sustainability.
| 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|
| Profit attributable to owners of the parent (EUR million) | 3,154 | 1,204 |
| Weighted average number of shares (thousands) | 888,367 | 888,367 |
| Basic earnings per share (EUR) | 3.55 | 1.36 |
At the end of 2014 Fortum had no diluting stock option schemes.
Dividends proposed by the Board of Directors are not recognised in the financial statements until they have been approved by the Company's shareholders at the General Meeting of the shareholders.
A dividend in respect of 2014 of EUR 1.10 per share and an extra dividend of EUR 0.20 per share, amounting to a total dividend of EUR 1,155 million based on the amount of shares registered as of 3 February 2015 is to be proposed at the Annual General Meeting on 31 March 2015. These financial statements do not reflect this dividend.
A dividend in respect of 2013 of EUR 1.10 per share, amounting to a total dividend of EUR 977 million, was decided at the Annual General Meeting on 8 April 2014. The dividend was paid on 22 April 2014.
A dividend in respect of 2012 of EUR 1.00 per share, amounting to a total dividend of EUR 888 million, was decided at the General Meeting on 9 April 2013. The dividend was paid on 19 April 2013.
Financial assets and liabilities in the tables below are split into categories in accordance with IAS 39. The categories are further split into classes which are the basis for valuing a respective asset or liability. Further information can be found in the Notes mentioned in the table.
| Loans and receivables |
Financial assets at fair value through profit and loss |
|||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hedge | Fair value recognised in equity, |
Available | ||||||
| accounting, | cash | for-sale | Total | |||||
| EUR million | Note | Amortised cost |
fair value hedges |
Non-hedge accounting |
flow hedges |
financial assets |
Finance leases |
financial assets |
| Financial instruments in non current assets |
||||||||
| Other non-current assets | 21 | 38 | 30 | 68 | ||||
| Derivative financial instruments | 3 | |||||||
| Electricity derivatives | 49 | 1 | 50 | |||||
| Interest rate and currency derivatives |
191 | 206 | 144 | 541 | ||||
| Oil and other futures and forward contracts |
3 | 3 | ||||||
| Long-term interest-bearing receivables |
22 | 2,041 | 0 | 2,041 | ||||
| Financial instruments in current assets |
||||||||
| Derivative financial instruments | 3 | |||||||
| Electricity derivatives | 47 | 67 | 114 | |||||
| Interest rate and currency derivatives |
274 | 48 | 322 | |||||
| Oil and other futures and forward contracts |
12 | 0 | 12 | |||||
| Trade receivables | 24 | 549 | 549 | |||||
| Other short-term interest-bearing receivables |
24 | 4 | 0 | 4 | ||||
| Liquid funds | 25 | 2,766 | 2,766 | |||||
| Total | 5,398 | 191 | 591 | 260 | 30 | 0 | 6,470 |
| Loans and receivables |
Financial assets at fair value through profit and loss |
|||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EUR million | Note | Amortised cost |
Hedge accounting, fair value hedges |
Non-hedge accounting |
Fair value recognised in equity, cash flow hedges |
Available for-sale financial assets |
Finance leases |
Total financial assets |
| Financial instruments in non current assets |
||||||||
| Other non-current assets | 21 | 46 | 31 | 77 | ||||
| Derivative financial instruments | 3 | |||||||
| Electricity derivatives | 43 | 42 | 85 | |||||
| Interest rate and currency derivatives |
70 | 186 | 23 | 279 | ||||
| Oil and other futures and forward contracts |
3 | 3 | ||||||
| Long-term interest-bearing receivables |
22 | 2,596 | 2 | 2,598 | ||||
| Financial instruments in current assets |
||||||||
| Derivative financial instruments | 3 | |||||||
| Electricity derivatives | 88 | 104 | 192 | |||||
| Interest rate and currency derivatives |
80 | 5 | 85 | |||||
| Oil and other futures and forward contracts |
29 | 29 | ||||||
| Trade receivables | 24 | 618 | 618 | |||||
| Other short-term interest-bearing receivables |
24 | 6 | 6 | |||||
| Liquid funds | 25 | 1,265 | 1,265 | |||||
| Total | 4,531 | 70 | 429 | 174 | 31 | 2 | 5,237 |
| Financial liabilities at fair value through profit and loss |
Other financial liabilities |
|||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hedge accounting, |
Fair value recognised |
Total | ||||||
| EUR million | Note | fair value hedges |
Non-hedge accounting |
in equity, cash flow hedges |
Amortised costs |
Fair value | Finance leases |
financial liabilities |
| Financial instruments in non current liabilities |
||||||||
| Interest-bearing liabilities | 28 | 4,427 | 1) 1,454 |
0 | 5,881 | |||
| Derivative financial instruments | 3 | |||||||
| Electricity derivatives | 45 | 7 | 52 | |||||
| Interest rate and currency derivatives |
96 | 96 | 192 | |||||
| Oil and other futures and forward contracts |
3 | 3 | ||||||
| Financial instruments in current liabilities |
||||||||
| Interest-bearing liabilities | 28 | 1,103 | 0 | 1,103 | ||||
| Derivative financial instruments | 3 | |||||||
| Electricity derivatives | 27 | 1 | 28 | |||||
| Interest rate and currency derivatives |
22 | 22 | 44 | |||||
| Oil and other futures and | ||||||||
| forward contracts | 4 | 0 | 4 | |||||
| Trade payables | 34 | 298 | 298 | |||||
| Other liabilities | 34 | 69 | 69 | |||||
| Total | 0 | 197 | 126 | 5,897 | 1,454 | 0 | 7,675 |
1) Fair valued part of bond in fair value hedge relationship.
| Financial liabilities at fair value through profit and loss |
Other financial liabilities |
|||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hedge accounting, fair value |
Non-hedge | Fair value recognised in equity, cash |
Amortised | Finance | Total financial |
|||
| EUR million | Note | hedges | accounting | flow hedges | costs | Fair value | leases | liabilities |
| Financial instruments in non current liabilities |
||||||||
| Interest-bearing liabilities | 28 | 5,637 | 1) 1,299 |
6,936 | ||||
| Derivative financial instruments | 3 | |||||||
| Electricity derivatives | 30 | 7 | 37 | |||||
| Interest rate and currency derivatives |
22 | 71 | 49 | 142 | ||||
| Oil and other futures and forward contracts |
2 | 2 | ||||||
| Financial instruments in current liabilities |
||||||||
| Interest-bearing liabilities 2) | 28 | 2,103 | 2,103 | |||||
| Derivative financial instruments | 3 | |||||||
| Electricity derivatives | 31 | 31 | ||||||
| Interest rate and currency derivatives |
48 | 5 | 53 | |||||
| Oil and other futures and | ||||||||
| forward contracts | 10 | 1 | 11 | |||||
| Trade payables | 34 | 386 | 386 | |||||
| Other liabilities | 34 | 132 | 132 | |||||
| Total | 22 | 192 | 62 | 8,258 | 1,299 | 0 | 9,833 |
1) Fair valued part of bond in fair value hedge relationship.
2) Including interest-bearing liabilities, EUR 20 million, in Liabilities related to assets held for sale at 31 December 2013 of which EUR 4 million in current liabilities.
| Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Netting 2) | Total | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EUR million Note |
2014 | 2013 | 2014 | 2013 | 2014 | 2013 | 2014 | 2013 | 2014 | 2013 |
| In non-current assets | ||||||||||
| Available for sale financial assets 1) 21 |
1 | 1 | 29 | 30 | 30 | 31 | ||||
| Derivative financial instruments 3 |
||||||||||
| Electricity derivatives | ||||||||||
| Hedge accounting | 6 | 54 | -5 | -12 | 1 | 42 | ||||
| Non-hedge accounting | 66 | 71 | -17 | -28 | 49 | 43 | ||||
| Interest rate and currency derivatives | ||||||||||
| Hedge accounting | 335 | 94 | 335 | 94 | ||||||
| Non-hedge accounting | 206 | 186 | 206 | 186 | ||||||
| Oil and other futures and forward contracts |
||||||||||
| Non-hedge accounting | 1 | 3 | 6 | -3 | 3 | 3 | ||||
| In current assets | ||||||||||
| Derivative financial instruments 3 |
||||||||||
| Electricity derivatives | ||||||||||
| Hedge accounting | 79 | 127 | -11 | -23 | 67 | 104 | ||||
| Non-hedge accounting | 2 | 153 | 250 | -106 | -164 | 47 | 88 | |||
| Interest rate and currency derivatives | ||||||||||
| Hedge accounting | 48 | 5 | 48 | 5 | ||||||
| Non-hedge accounting | 274 | 80 | 274 | 80 | ||||||
| Oil and other futures and forward contracts |
||||||||||
| Hedge accounting | 1 | -1 | 0 | 0 | ||||||
| Non-hedge accounting | 30 | 59 | 9 | -26 | -32 | 12 | 29 | |||
| Total | 32 | 66 | 1,182 | 867 | 29 | 30 | -168 | -260 | 1,073 | 706 |
| Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Netting 2) | Total | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EUR million | Note | 2014 | 2013 | 2014 | 2013 | 2014 | 2013 | 2014 | 2013 | 2014 | 2013 |
| In non-current liabilities | |||||||||||
| Interest-bearing liabilities | 28 | 1,454 | 3) 1,299 |
1,454 | 1,299 | ||||||
| Derivative financial instruments | 3 | ||||||||||
| Electricity derivatives | |||||||||||
| Hedge accounting | 11 | 19 | -5 | -12 | 7 | 7 | |||||
| Non-hedge accounting | 62 | 58 | -17 | -28 | 45 | 30 | |||||
| Interest rate and currency derivatives | |||||||||||
| Hedge accounting | 96 | 72 | 96 | 72 | |||||||
| Non-hedge accounting | 96 | 71 | 96 | 71 | |||||||
| Oil and other futures and forward contracts |
|||||||||||
| Non-hedge accounting | 5 | 2 | 2 | -3 | 3 | 2 | |||||
| In current liabilities | |||||||||||
| Derivative financial instruments | 3 | ||||||||||
| Electricity derivatives | |||||||||||
| Hedge accounting | 12 | 23 | -11 | -23 | 1 | 0 | |||||
| Non-hedge accounting | 3 | 134 | 192 | -106 | -164 | 27 | 31 | ||||
| Interest rate and currency derivatives | |||||||||||
| Hedge accounting | 22 | 5 | 22 | 5 | |||||||
| Non-hedge accounting | 22 | 48 | 22 | 48 | |||||||
| Oil and other futures and forward contracts |
|||||||||||
| Hedge accounting | 2 | -1 | 0 | 1 | |||||||
| Non-hedge accounting | 29 | 41 | 2 | -26 | -32 | 4 | 10 | ||||
| Total | 34 | 48 | 1,913 | 1,787 | 0 | 0 | -168 | -260 | 1,778 | 1,575 |
1) Available for sale financial assets, i.e. shares which are not classified as associated companies or joint ventures, consists mainly of shares in unlisted companies of EUR 30 million (2013: 30), for which the fair value cannot be reliably determined. These assets are measured at cost less possible impairment.
Available for sale financial assets include listed shares at fair value of EUR 1 million (2013: 1). The cumulative fair value change booked in Fortum's equity was EUR -3 million (2013: -3).
2) Receivables and liabilities against electricity, oil and other commodity exchanges arising from standard derivative contracts with same delivery period are netted.
3) Fair valued part of bond in fair value hedge relationship.
Net fair value amount of interest rate and currency derivatives is EUR 626 million, assets EUR 863 million and liabilities EUR 237 million. Fortum has cash collaterals based on Credit Support Annex agreements with some counterparties. At the end of December 2014 Fortum had received EUR 286 million from Credit Support Annex agreements. The received cash has been booked as short term liability.
| Goodwill | Other intangible assets |
Total | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EUR million | 2014 | 2013 | 2014 | 2013 | 2014 | 2013 | |
| Cost 1 January | 275 | 309 | 368 | 424 | 644 | 733 | |
| Translation differences and other adjustments | -101 | -34 | -12 | -1 | -113 | -35 | |
| Capital expenditure | 0 | 0 | 22 | 46 | 22 | 46 | |
| Change in emission rights | 0 | 0 | -1 | 7 | -1 | 7 | |
| Disposals | 0 | 0 | -1 | -20 | -1 | -20 | |
| Sale of subsidiary companies | -4 | 0 | -24 | -3 | -28 | -3 | |
| Reclassifications | 0 | 0 | 27 | 5 | 27 | 5 | |
| Moved to Assets held for sale | 0 | 0 | 0 | -89 | 0 | -89 | |
| Cost 31 December | 170 | 275 | 379 | 368 | 549 | 644 | |
| Accumulated depreciation 1 January | 0 | 0 | 260 | 306 | 260 | 306 | |
| Translation differences and other adjustments | 0 | 0 | -11 | -1 | -11 | -1 | |
| Disposals | 0 | 0 | -2 | -20 | -2 | -20 | |
| Sale of subsidiary companies | 0 | 0 | -5 | 0 | -5 | 0 | |
| Reclassifications | 0 | 0 | 5 | 3 | 5 | 3 | |
| Depreciation for the period | 0 | 0 | 25 | 26 | 25 | 26 | |
| Moved to Assets held for sale | 0 | 0 | 0 | -54 | 0 | -54 | |
| Accumulated depreciation 31 December | 0 | 0 | 273 | 260 | 273 | 260 | |
| Carrying amount 31 December | 170 | 275 | 106 | 109 | 276 | 384 |
The goodwill is included in Russia segment and relates to the acquisition of OAO Fortum. The goodwill has been tested for impairment by comparing recoverable amounts of the net operating assets of OAO Fortum, including goodwill, with their carrying amounts. The recoverable amounts were determined on the basis of value in use, applying discounted cash flow calculations.
See also note 19 for information on impairment testing.
The main items in other intangible assets are costs for software products and software licenses, bought emission rights and emission rights received free of charge, which are recognised to the lower of fair value and historical cost.
| EUR million | Land, waterfall, rights and tunnels |
Buildings, plants and structures |
Machinery and equipment |
Other tangible assets |
Advances paid and construction in progress |
Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cost 1 January 2014 | 2,974 | 3,424 | 11,120 | 144 | 1,161 | 18,824 |
| Translation differences and other adjustments | -164 | -426 | -1,176 | -4 | -274 | -2,043 |
| Capital expenditure | 2 | 22 | 28 | 0 | 700 | 752 |
| Nuclear asset retirement cost | 0 | 0 | -3 | 0 | 0 | -3 |
| Disposals | -1 | -5 | -259 | 0 | -1 | -266 |
| Sale of subsidiary companies | -1 | -88 | -443 | -1 | -16 | -549 |
| Reclassifications | 0 | 182 | 461 | -4 | -666 | -27 |
| Cost 31 December 2014 | 2,810 | 3,110 | 9,728 | 136 | 904 | 16,687 |
| Accumulated depreciation 1 January 2014 | 0 | 1,321 | 4,542 | 111 | 0 | 5,974 |
| Translation differences and other adjustments | 0 | -67 | -330 | -3 | 0 | -400 |
| Disposals | 0 | -1 | -258 | 0 | 0 | -259 |
| Sale of subsidiary companies | 0 | -31 | -287 | -1 | 0 | -319 |
| Depreciation for the period | 0 | 111 | 387 | 3 | 0 | 502 |
| Reclassifications | 0 | -5 | -1 | 0 | 0 | -5 |
| Accumulated depreciation 31 December 2014 | 0 | 1,328 | 4,054 | 111 | 0 | 5,492 |
| Carrying amount 31 December 2014 | 2,810 | 1,782 | 5,674 | 25 | 904 | 11,195 |
The change in property, plant and equipment was negative, even though capital expenditures were higher than depreciation during the year. The decreases were mainly due to the translation differences and sale of subsidiary companies. The main increase was due to the ongoing investment programme in OAO Fortum.
For more information on credit risks regarding ongoing investments, see Note 3.7 Credit risk.
Property, plant and equipment that are subject to restrictions in the form of real estate mortgages amount to EUR 274 million (2013: 240).
| EUR million | Land, waterfall, rights and tunnels |
Buildings, plants and structures |
Machinery and equipment |
Other tangible assets |
Advances paid and construction in progress |
Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cost 1 January 2013 | 3,069 | 3,080 | 12,414 | 137 | 2,284 | 20,985 |
| Translation differences and other adjustments | -93 | -146 | -466 | 5 | -139 | -839 |
| Increases through business combinations | 0 | 1 | 9 | 0 | 0 | 10 |
| Capital expenditure | 1 | 74 | 269 | 2 | 613 | 959 |
| Nuclear asset retirement cost | 0 | 0 | 45 | 0 | 0 | 45 |
| Disposals | -1 | -133 | -136 | -1 | -1 | -272 |
| Reclassifications | 1 | 579 | 960 | 1 | -1,546 | -5 |
| Moved to assets held for sale | -3 | -30 | -1,977 | -1 | -50 | -2,061 |
| Cost 31 December 2013 | 2,974 | 3,424 | 11,120 | 144 | 1,161 | 18,824 |
| Accumulated depreciation 1 January 2013 | 0 | 1,343 | 5,300 | 107 | 0 | 6,750 |
| Translation differences and other adjustments | 0 | -40 | -151 | 1 | 0 | -190 |
| Increases through business combinations | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Disposals | 0 | -100 | -97 | -1 | 0 | -198 |
| Depreciation for the period | 0 | 112 | 478 | 4 | 0 | 594 |
| Reclassifications | 0 | 28 | -32 | 1 | 0 | -3 |
| Moved to assets held for sale | 0 | -22 | -957 | -1 | 0 | -980 |
| Accumulated depreciation 31 December 2013 | 0 | 1,321 | 4,542 | 111 | - | 5,974 |
| Carrying amount 31 December 2013 | 2,974 | 2,103 | 6,579 | 33 | 1,161 | 12,849 |
| Buildings, plants and structures |
Machinery and equipment |
Advances paid and construction in progress |
Total | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EUR million | 2014 | 2013 | 2014 | 2013 | 2014 | 2013 | 2014 | 2013 |
| 1 January | 40 | 17 | 162 | 73 | 57 | 143 | 259 | 233 |
| Translation differences and other adjustments | -14 | -2 | -56 | -11 | -21 | -11 | -91 | -24 |
| Increases / disposals | -6 | 0 | 12 | 0 | 37 | 60 | 43 | 60 |
| Reclassification | 9 | 27 | 21 | 108 | -31 | -136 | -1 | -1 |
| Depreciation | 5 | -1 | -14 | -6 | 0 | 0 | -9 | -7 |
| Moved to Assets held for sale | 0 | 0 | 0 | -1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | -1 |
| 31 December | 35 | 40 | 125 | 162 | 42 | 57 | 202 | 259 |
Borrowing costs of EUR 47 million were capitalised in 2014 (2013: 60) for the OAO Fortum investment program. The interest rate used for capitalisation varied between 3,3 - 16,6% (2013: 2.8 - 8.7%).
| Other countries, |
||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Finland | Sweden | Estonia | Poland | Norway | total | Total | ||||||||
| EUR million | 2014 | 2013 | 2014 | 2013 | 2014 | 2013 | 2014 | 2013 | 2014 | 2013 | 2014 | 2013 | 2014 | 2013 |
| Power and Technology | ||||||||||||||
| Hydropower | 16 | 17 | 87 | 91 | 103 | 108 | ||||||||
| Nuclear power | 80 | 60 | 80 | 60 | ||||||||||
| Fossil-based electricity | 2 | 0 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Renewable-based electricity | 7 | 4 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 11 | 7 | |||||||
| Other | 3 | 2 | 3 | 2 | ||||||||||
| Total Power and | ||||||||||||||
| Technology | 106 | 85 | 88 | 94 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 197 | 179 |
| Heat, Electricity Sales and Solutions |
||||||||||||||
| Fossil-based heat | 3 | 7 | 5 | 2 | 1 | 8 | 10 | |||||||
| Fossil-based electricity | 1 | 2 | 1 | 2 | ||||||||||
| Renewable, of which |
24 | 17 | 13 | 39 | 37 | 56 | ||||||||
| waste | 3 | 14 | 3 | 14 | ||||||||||
| biofuels | 6 | 17 | 0 | 25 | 6 | 42 | ||||||||
| other | 18 | 10 | 28 | 0 | ||||||||||
| District heat network | 13 | 14 | 8 | 16 | 8 | 6 | 0 | 4 | 2 | 4 | 31 | 44 | ||
| Other | 4 | 8 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 9 | 10 | ||||||
| Total Heat, Electricity Sales and Solutions |
44 | 46 | 0 | 2 | 9 | 16 | 15 | 10 | 0 | 4 | 18 | 44 | 86 | 123 |
| Distribution | 11 | 128 | 133 | 121 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 9 | 0 | 0 | 147 | 255 |
| Other | 2 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 12 |
| Total excluding Russia segment |
163 | 269 | 221 | 217 | 9 | 16 | 15 | 10 | 3 | 13 | 22 | 47 | 433 | 570 |
| Russia | ||||||||||||||
| Fossil-based electricity | 305 | 387 | ||||||||||||
| Fossil-based heat | 35 | 48 | ||||||||||||
| Other | 0 | 0 | ||||||||||||
| Total Russia | 340 | 435 | ||||||||||||
| Total including Russia segment |
774 | 1,005 |
1) Includes capital expenditure to both intangible assets and property, plant and equipment.
Fortum classifies investments in four main categories. Maintence investments during 2014 in property, plant and equipment were EUR 181 million (2013: 200). Investments due to requirements of legislation were EUR 149 million (2013: 174). Investments increasing productivity were EUR 134 million (2013: 176) and growth investments were EUR 309 million (2013: 453).
In Finland, Fortum invested EUR 80 million (2013: 60) into the Loviisa nuclear power plant. Fortum invested additionally EUR 103 million (2013: 108) into hydro production, mainly refurbishment and productivity investments. The biggest of these were Höljes and Skedvi refurbishment in Sweden, EUR 30 million (2013: 24) and Imatra refurbishment in Finland, EUR 8 million (2013: 4). Investments for CO2 free production were EUR 194 million (2013: 175).
Growth investments in Heat, Electricity Sales and Solutions segment totalled EUR 34 million (2013: 89) in year 2014. Refurbishment and legislation investments totalled EUR 53 million (2013: 34). This amount consists mainly of investments in district heat networks and plants as well as the maintenance of existing CHP plants and measures defined by legal requirements. Larger ongoing projects in 2014 comprised of new heat pump and bio-pellet fuel conversion in heat boiler in Espoo and district heat connection in Poland. Investments for CO2 free production were EUR 37 million (2013: 56).
Distribution invested EUR 147 million (2013: 255) in reliability of electricity distribution, maintenance and new investments in Finland, Sweden, and Norway. Lower investment level is consequense of Fortum's divestments of its Finnish electricity distribution business to Suomi Power Networks in March 2014 and its Norwegian electricity business to the Hafslund Group in May 2014.
OAO Fortum has an extensive investment programme aiming to almost double its power capacity with 2,300 MW. During 2014 EUR 235 million (2013: 249) was invested in this programme. The value for the remaining part of the programme is estimated to be approximately EUR 0.2 billion from January 2015 onwards. The last two units are to be completed by mid of 2015. The third unit at Nyagan power plant started commercial operation at the end of 2014. Altogether, Fortum's extensive investment programme in Russia consists of eight new units.
Key assumptions used in impairment testing are presented below as well as the basis for determining the value of each assumption. Assumptions are based on internal and external data that are consistent with observable market information, when applicable. The assumptions are determined by management as part of the business planning process for the Fortum Group.
| Key assumptions | Basis for determining the value for key assumptions |
|---|---|
| Power market development | Historical analysis and prospective forecasting |
| Regulation framework | Current market setup and prospective forecasting (e.g. CSA mechanism) |
| Utilisation of power plants | Past experience, technical assessment and forecasted market development |
| Forecasted maintenance investments | Past experience, technical assessment and planned maintenance work |
| Finalisation of the investment programme | Project forecasts |
| Discount rate | Mostly market based information |
The cash flows used in testing are based on the most recent business plans and are determined in local currency. The period covered by cash flows is related to the useful lives of the assets being reviewed for impairment. The growth rate used to extrapolate the cash flow projections until the end of assets' useful lives is in line with the assumed inflation. In Russia the generation capacity built after 2007 under the Russian Government's Capacity Supply Agreements receives guaranteed capacity payments for a period of 10 years.
The discount rate takes into account the risk profile of the country in which the cash flows are generated. There have not been any major changes in the discount rate components or in the methods used to determine them. The long-term pre-tax discount rate used for Russia was 10.8% (2013: 10.5%).
The net operating assets of OAO Fortum, including fair value adjustments and goodwill arising from the acquisition of the company are tested yearly for possible impairment. As of 31 December 2014, the recoverable values were greater than their carrying values and therefore no impairments were booked. In light with the sharp rise in the Russian interest rates at the end of 2014 an additional assessment has been performed in January 2015 using a pre-tax discount rate of 12.3%. The reassessment confirmed the results from the earlier testing.
The Group has considered the sensitivity of key assumptions as part of the impairment testing. When doing this any consequential effect of the change on the other variables has also been considered. The calculations are most sensitive to changes in estimated future operating profit levels and changes in discount rate.
Management estimates that a reasonably possible change in the discount rate used or in future earnings would not cause Russian cash generating unit's carrying amount to exceed its recoverable amount. Based on the sensitivity analysis done, if the estimated future operating profits before depreciation were 10% lower than management's estimates or pre-tax discount rate applied was 10% higher than the one used, the Group would not need to recognise impairment losses for property plant and equipment or goodwill.
| Forsmarks | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OKG AB | Kraftgrupp AB | Kemijoki Oy | Hafslund ASA | TGC-1 | TVO | Fortum Värme | |
| Holding in | Holding in | ||||||
| Power | Power | energy | energy | Power | Holding in | ||
| production | Power production | production | company | company | production | power and | |
| Nature of the relationship | company | company | company | (listed) | (listed) | company | heat company |
| Associated | Associated | Associated | Associated | Associated | |||
| Classification | company | company | company | company | company | Joint venture | Joint venture |
| Heat, | |||||||
| Electricity | |||||||
| Power and | Power and | Power and | Power and | Sales and | |||
| Segment | Technology | Technology | Technology | Other | Russia | Technology | Solutions |
| Domicile | Sweden | Sweden | Finland | Norway | Russia | Finland | Sweden |
| Ownership interest, % 1) | 46 | 26 | 59 | 34 | 29 | 26 | 50 |
| Votes, % | 46 | 26 | 18 | 33 | 29 | 26 | 50 |
1) Kemijoki and TVO have different series of shares. The ownership interest varies due to the changes in equity assigned to the different share series. The ownership interests for 2013 for Kemijoki Oy and TVO were 59% and 26% respectively.
Power plants are often built jointly with other power producers. Under the consortium agreements, each owner is entitled to electricity in proportion to its share of ownership or other agreements and each owner is liable for an equivalent portion of costs. The production companies are not profit making, since the owners purchase electricity at production cost including interest cost and production taxes. The share of profit of these companies is mainly IFRS adjustments (e.g. accounting for nuclear related assets and liabilities) and depreciations on fair value adjustments from historical acquisitions since the companies are not profit making under local accounting principles.
Fortum has material shareholdings in such power production companies (mainly nuclear and hydro) that are consolidated using equity method either as associated companies (OKG AB, Forsmarks Kraftgrupp AB and Kemijoki Oy) or in some cases as joint ventures (Teollisuuden Voima Oyj (TVO)).
In Sweden nuclear production company shareholdings are 45.5% ownership of the shares in OKG AB and 25.5% ownership of the shares in Forsmarks Kraftgrupp AB. Excluding non-controlling interests in the subsidiaries, Fortum's participation in the companies are 43.4% and 22.2% respectively, which reflects the share of electricity produced that Fortum can sell further to the market. The minority part of the electricity purchased is invoiced further to each minority owner according to their respective shareholding and treated as pass-through. OKG AB and Forsmarks Kraftgrupp AB are accounted for as associated companies as Fortum has a representation on the Board of Directors and it participates in policy-making processes of the companies.
In Finland Fortum has an ownership in power production company TVO that has three series of shares which entitle the shareholders to electricity produced in the different power plants owned by TVO.
Shares in series A entitle to electricity produced in nuclear power plants Olkiluoto 1 and 2 and Fortum owns 26.6% of these shares. Series B entitles to electricity in the nuclear power plant presently being built, Olkiluoto 3, and Fortum's ownership in this share series is 25%. Series C entitles to electricity produced in TVO's share of the thermal power plant Meri-Pori. The Meri-Pori power plant is accounted for as a joint operation in Fortum. Fortum accounts for its 54.55% of the assets and TVO for 45.45%.
The most significant hydro production company shareholding is 63.8% of the hydro shares and 15.4% of the monetary shares in Kemijoki Oy. Each owner of hydro shares is entitled to the hydropower production in proportion to its hydro shareholding. Since Fortum has a representation on the Board of Directors and it participates in the policy-making processes, Kemijoki Oy is accounted for as an associated company.
In Sweden Fortum has a 50.1% ownership in AB Fortum Värme Holding samägt med Stockholms stad (Fortum Värme). Fortum Värme is a district heating company, producing heat and power with CHP plants in Stockholm area, that is co-owned with the City of Stockholm. The shareholding is accounted for as a joint venture as according to the shareholders agreement control is shared.
Fortum owns shareholdings in listed companies such as Hafslund ASA and Territorial Generating Company 1 (TGC-1). The shareholdings are accounted for as associated companies as Fortum has representatives in the Board of Directors of the companies. The share of profit of these companies is accounted for based on previous quarter information since updated interim information is not normally available.
| EUR million | 2014 | 2013 |
|---|---|---|
| Principal associates | 1,074 | 1,263 |
| Principal joint ventures | 730 | 721 |
| Other associates | 42 | 226 |
| Other joint ventures | 182 | 132 |
| Carrying amount 31 December | 2,027 | 2,341 |
| Associated | Associated | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EUR million | Joint ventures 2014 |
companies 2014 |
Joint ventures 2013 |
companies 2013 |
| Historical cost | ||||
| 1 January | 518 | 1,130 | 529 | 1,270 |
| Translation differences and other adjustments | -11 | -166 | -7 | -88 |
| Acquisitions | 36 | 26 | 0 | 0 |
| Reclassifications | 5 | -9 | 0 | -6 |
| Divestments | -3 | -143 | -4 | -45 |
| Historical cost 31 December | 546 | 838 | 518 | 1,130 |
| Equity adjustments | ||||
| 1 January | 334 | 359 | 270 | 305 |
| Translation differences and other adjustments | -23 | -71 | -17 | -15 |
| Share of profits of associates and joint ventures | 76 | 72 | 92 | 86 |
| Reclassifications | 12 | -7 | 0 | 6 |
| Divestments | 0 | -36 | 0 | -16 |
| Dividends received | -27 | -30 | -24 | -49 |
| OCI items associated companies | -6 | -10 | 13 | 42 |
| Equity adjustments 31 December | 366 | 277 | 334 | 359 |
| Carrying amount at 31 December | 912 | 1,115 | 853 | 1,489 |
| EUR million | 2014 | 2013 |
|---|---|---|
| Principal associates | ||
| OKG AB | 5 | 13 |
| Forsmarks Kraftgrupp AB | -9 | -4 |
| Kemijoki Oy | -5 | -8 |
| Hafslund ASA | 36 | 31 |
| TGC-1 | 35 | 46 |
| Principal associates, total | 61 | 78 |
| Principal joint ventures | ||
| Fortum Värme | 67 | 73 |
| TVO | -4 | 12 |
| Principal joint ventures, total | 64 | 84 |
| Other associates | 11 | 8 |
| Other joint ventures | 12 | 7 |
| Total | 149 | 178 |
The unrecognized share of losses of associated companies and joint ventures (for the reporting period and cumulatively) is zero.
Share of profits from Teollisuuden Voima Oyj, Forsmarks Kraftgrupp AB and OKG AB includes EUR 2 million (2013: 17) arising from accounting of nuclear related assets and liabilities.
During 2014 Fortum has acquired additional shares in its associated company, Territorial Generating Company 1. After the acquisition Fortum owns 29.45% of the shares in TGC-1.
In July 2014 Fortum acquired 33.66% in AS Eesti Gaas and a similar shareholding in AS Võrguteenus Valdus. The acquired shares increased Fortum's holding in both companies to approximately 51%. Fortum continues to account for its holdings in the Estonian natural gas businesses using the equity method.
There were no material investments in associated companies or joint ventures during 2013.
In November Fortum's Heat, Electricity Sales and Solutions segment sold its 31% shareholding in the Finnish natural gas company Gasum Oy.
During the first quarter 2014 Power and Technology segment divested Fortum's 30% shareholding in its associated company Karlshamn Kraft AB.
In June 2013, Fortum agreed to sell its 47.9% ownership in the Swedish energy associate Härjeåns Kraft AB. The transaction was completed in July.
In July 2013 Fortum completed the divestment of its 33% holding in associated company Infratek ASA.
See also Note 8 Acquisitions and disposals.
| TGC-1 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 30 Sept 2014 | ||||
| 1,814 | ||||
| 259 | ||||
| 481 | ||||
| 205 | ||||
| 1,388 | ||||
| 118 | ||||
| 1,270 | ||||
| 1 Jan 2013 - | 1 Jan 2013 - | 1 Jan 2013 - | 1 Oct 2013 - | 1 Oct 2013 - |
| 31 Dec 2013 | 31 Dec 2013 | 31 Dec 2013 | 30 Sep 2014 | 30 Sep 2014 |
| 568 | 727 | 57 | 1,481 | 1,357 |
| 1 | 1 | -7 | 120 | 126 |
| -23 | ||||
| 1 | 1 | -7 | 96 | 126 |
| 8 | ||||
| 1 | 1 | -7 | 96 | 118 |
| 489 | ||||
| 35 | ||||
| -4 | ||||
| 52 | ||||
| -198 | ||||
| 374 | ||||
| 145 | 79 | 158 | 11 | -48 |
| 151 | 88 | 210 | 299 | 326 |
| 373 | 71 | |||
| OKG AB 31 Dec 2013 2,200 462 2,552 97 13 13 8 -2 6 |
Forsmarks Kraftgrupp AB 31 Dec 2013 2,094 488 2,348 197 37 37 10 9 |
Kemijoki Oy 31 Dec 2013 449 9 279 90 88 88 57 -5 52 |
Hafslund ASA 30 Sept 2014 2,426 406 1,452 532 849 2 847 298 33 -20 -23 289 |
1) The market quotation for the TGC-1 share is affected by the low liquidity of the TGC-1 shares in the Russian stock exchanges. During 2014 trading volumes of TGC-1 shares in relation to the number of shares of the company were approximately 9% (2013: 10%).
| Forsmarks | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EUR million | OKG AB | Kraftgrupp AB | Kemijoki Oy | Hafslund ASA | TGC-1 |
| Balance sheet | 31 Dec 2012 | 31 Dec 2012 | 31 Dec 2012 | 30 Sept 2013 | 30 Sept 2013 |
| Non-current assets | 2,191 | 2,061 | 453 | 2,482 | 2,878 |
| Current assets | 429 | 512 | 9 | 388 | 366 |
| Non-current liabilities | 2,480 | 2,284 | 237 | 1,447 | 732 |
| Current liabilities | 121 | 251 | 129 | 545 | 427 |
| Equity | 18 | 38 | 96 | 877 | 2,085 |
| Attributable to NCI | 2 | 179 | |||
| Attributable to the owners of the parent | 18 | 38 | 96 | 875 | 1,906 |
| Statement of comprehensive income | 1 Jan 2012 - 31 Dec 2012 |
1 Jan 2012 - 31 Dec 2012 |
1 Jan 2012 - 31 Dec 2012 |
1 Oct 2012 - 30 Sep 2013 |
1 Oct 2012 - 30 Sep 2013 |
| Revenue | 594 | 753 | 56 | 1,634 | 1,641 |
| Profit or loss from continuing operations | 6 | -8 | 95 | 167 | |
| Other comprehensive income | -2 | 0 | |||
| Total comprehensive income | 6 | -8 | 92 | 167 | |
| Attributable to NCI | 8 | ||||
| Attributable to the owners of the parent | 6 | -8 | 92 | 159 | |
| Reconciliation to carrying amount in the Fortum group | |||||
| Group's interest in the equity of the associate at 1 January | 6 | 10 | 63 | 305 | 510 |
| Change in share of profit and from OCI items | 3 | -6 | 52 | 46 | |
| Dividends received | -3 | -21 | -3 | ||
| Translation differences and other adjustments | 2 | -38 | -64 | ||
| Group's interest in the equity of the | |||||
| associate at 31 December | 8 | 10 | 57 | 298 | 489 |
| Fair values on acquisitions and different accounting principles | 176 | 68 | 158 | 24 | -26 |
| Carrying amount at 31 December | 184 | 78 | 215 | 323 | 463 |
| Market value for listed shares | 369 | 145 |
| 2014 | 2013 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fortum | Fortum | |||
| EUR million | TVO | Värme | TVO | Värme |
| Balance sheet | 30 Sept 2014 | 31 Dec 2014 | 30 Sept 2013 | 31 Dec 2013 |
| Non-current assets | 6,567 | 2,552 | 6,218 | 2,490 |
| Current assets | 423 | 313 | 507 | 322 |
| of which cash and cash equivalents | 128 | 6 | 220 | 3 |
| Non-current liabilities | 4,994 | 1,362 | 4,870 | 1,266 |
| of which non-current interest-bearing liabilities | 4,078 | 995 | 3,982 | 906 |
| Current liabilities | 516 | 432 | 387 | 471 |
| of which current financial liabilities | 351 | 298 | 180 | 301 |
| Equity 1) | 1,480 | 1,071 | 1,468 | 1,074 |
| Attributable to NCI | 1 | |||
| Attributable to the shareholders of the company | 1,480 | 1,071 | 1,468 | 1,073 |
| 1 Oct 2013 - | 1 Jan 2014 - | 1 Oct 2012 - | 1 Jan 2013 - | |
| Statement of comprehensive income | 30 Sep 2014 | 31 Dec 2014 | 30 Sep 2013 | 31 Dec 2013 |
| Revenue | 353 | 716 | 386 | 807 |
| Depreciation and amortisation | -58 | -128 | -57 | -124 |
| Interest income | 23 | 1 | 36 | 1 |
| Interest expense | -67 | -28 | -64 | -29 |
| Income tax expense or income | -30 | -33 | ||
| Profit or loss from continuing operations | 4 | 126 | 36 | 136 |
| Other comprehensive income | 12 | -22 | 12 | 20 |
| Total comprehensive income | 16 | 104 | 48 | 157 |
| Attributable to NCI | 1 | |||
| Attributable to the shareholders of the company | 16 | 104 | 48 | 155 |
| Reconciliation to carrying amount in the Fortum group | ||||
| Group's interest in the equity of the joint venture at 1 January | 289 | 537 | 277 | 498 |
| Change in share of profit and from OCI items | 3 | 53 | 12 | 78 |
| Dividends received | -22 | -23 | ||
| Translation differences and other adjustments | -32 | -16 | ||
| Group's interest in the equity of the joint venture at 31 December | 292 | 535 | 289 | 537 |
| Fair values on acquisitions and different accounting principles | -7 | -91 | -5 | -101 |
| Carrying amount at 31 December | 285 | 445 | 284 | 436 |
1) The equity of TVO includes subordinated loans of EUR 339 million (2013: 339). Fortum has given part of these loans, pro rata to the ownership.
See also Associated companies in Note 39 Legal actions and official proceedings.
See Note 30 Nuclear related assets and liabilities.
| EUR million | 2014 | 2013 |
|---|---|---|
| Sales to associated companies | 1 | 0 |
| Interest on associated company loan receivables | 31 | 28 |
| Purchases from associated companies | 483 | 539 |
Purchases from associated companies include mainly purchases of nuclear and hydro power at production cost including interest costs and production taxes.
| EUR million | 2014 | 2013 |
|---|---|---|
| Receivables from associated companies | ||
| Long-term interest-bearing loan receivables | 1,327 | 1,320 |
| Trade receivables | 1 | 0 |
| Other receivables | 0 | 12 |
| Liabilities to associated companies | ||
| Long-term loan payables | 1 | 0 |
| Trade payables | 1 | 10 |
| Other payables | 0 | 0 |
| EUR million | 2014 | 2013 |
|---|---|---|
| Sales to joint ventures | 82 | 94 |
| Interest on joint venture loan receivables | 28 | 34 |
| Purchases from joint ventures | 85 | 113 |
Purchases from joint ventures include mainly purchases of nuclear and hydro power at production cost including interest costs and production taxes.
| EUR million | 2014 | 2013 |
|---|---|---|
| Receivables from joint ventures | ||
| Long-term interest-bearing loan receivables | 714 | 1,267 |
| Trade receivables | 17 | 27 |
| Other receivables | 15 | 20 |
| Liabilities to joint ventures | ||
| Long-term loan payables | 261 | 248 |
| Trade payables | 5 | 6 |
| Other payables | 4 | 3 |
| EUR million | 2014 | 2013 |
|---|---|---|
| Available for sale financial assets | 30 | 31 |
| Other | 38 | 46 |
| Total | 68 | 77 |
Available for sale financial assets, i.e. shares which are not classified as associated companies or joint ventures, consist mainly of shares in unlisted companies of EUR 30 million (2013: 30), for which the fair value can not be reliably determined. These assets are measured at cost less possible impairment.
Available for sale financial assets include listed shares at fair value of EUR 1 million (2013: 1). The cumulative fair value change booked in Fortum's equity was EUR -3 million (2013: -3).
| EUR million | 2014 | 2013 |
|---|---|---|
| Long-term loan receivables | 2,041 | 2,595 |
| Finance lease receivables | 0 | 2 |
| Total long-term interest-bearing receivables | 2,041 | 2,598 |
| Other short-term interest-bearing receivables | 4 | 6 |
| Total short-term interest-bearing receivables 1) | 4 | 6 |
| Total | 2,045 | 2,603 |
1) Included in trade and other receivables in the balance sheet, see Note 24.
Long-term loan receivables include receivables from associated companies and joint ventures EUR 2,041 million (2013: 2,587), mainly from Swedish nuclear companies, OKG AB and Forsmark Kraftgrupp AB, EUR 1,310 million (2013: 1,312) and Fortum Värme samägt med Stockholms stad EUR 553 million (2013: 1,135). The nuclear companies are mainly funded with shareholder loans, pro rata each shareholder's ownership.
TVO is building Olkiluoto 3, the nuclear power plant, which is funded through external loans, share issues and shareholder loans according to shareholders' agreement between the owners of TVO. At end of December 2014 Fortum has EUR 95 million outstanding receivables regarding Olkiluoto 3 and is additionally committed to provide at maximum EUR 100 million. A subordinated shareholder loan EUR 15 million has also been given to fund planning of Olkiluoto 4, to which Fortum has additionally committed to provide EUR 57 million.
For further information regarding credit risk management, see Note 3.7 Credit risk.
| Repricing | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EUR million | Effective interest rate, % |
Carrying amount 2014 |
Under 1 year |
1-5 years |
Over 5 years |
Fair value 2014 |
Carrying amount 2013 |
Fair value 2013 |
| Long-term loan receivables | 2.4 | 2,044 | 1,857 | 3 | 184 | 2,216 | 2,600 | 2,702 |
| Finance lease receivables | - | - | - | - | - | - | 2 | 4 |
| Total long-term interest-bearing receivables 1) |
2.4 | 2,044 | 1,857 | 3 | 184 | 2,216 | 2,602 | 2,706 |
| Other short-term interest-bearing receivables |
0.0 | 0 | 0 | - | - | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Total interest-bearing receivables | 2.4 | 2,045 | 1,857 | 3 | 184 | 2,216 | 2,603 | 2,707 |
1) Including current portion of long-term receivables EUR 3 million (2013: 5).
| EUR million | 2014 | 2013 |
|---|---|---|
| Nuclear fuel | 105 | 109 |
| Coal | 77 | 66 |
| Oil | 12 | 15 |
| Biofuels | 1 | 2 |
| Other inventories | 61 | 71 |
| Total | 256 | 264 |
No write downs have been booked related to inventories during 2014 or 2013.
| EUR million | 2014 | 2013 |
|---|---|---|
| Trade receivables | 549 | 618 |
| Income tax receivables | 132 | 98 |
| Accrued interest income | 6 | 21 |
| Accrued income and prepaid expenses | 23 | 20 |
| Other receivables | 116 | 147 |
| Other short-term interest-bearing receivables | 4 | 6 |
| Moved to assets held for sale | 0 | -42 |
| Total | 830 | 869 |
The management considers that the carrying amount of trade and other receivables approximates their fair value.
| 2014 | 2013 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EUR million | Gross | Impaired | Gross | Impaired |
| Not past due | 504 | 2 | 577 | 2 |
| Past due 1-90 days | 44 | 4 | 37 | 2 |
| Past due 91-180 days | 6 | 3 | 10 | 2 |
| Past due more than 181 days | 50 | 46 | 75 | 75 |
| Total | 604 | 55 | 699 | 80 |
Impairment losses recognised in the income statement were EUR 11 million (2013: 24), of which EUR 4 million (2013: 18) are impairment losses recognised in the OAO Fortum Group. On 31 December 2014, trade receivables of EUR 55 million (2013: 80) are impaired and provided for, of which EUR 46 million (2013: 73) refers to the OAO Fortum Group.
For information regarding impairment losses by segment, see Note 5 Segment reporting.
| EUR million | 2014 | 2013 |
|---|---|---|
| EUR | 204 | 219 |
| SEK | 202 | 223 |
| RUB | 132 | 173 |
| NOK | 12 | 30 |
| PLN | 45 | 31 |
| Other | 9 | 23 |
| Total | 604 | 699 |
Trade receivables are arising from a large number of customers mainly in EUR, SEK and RUB mitigating the concentration of risk.
For further information regarding credit risk management and credit risks, see
Counterparty risks in the Operating and financial review
| EUR million | 2014 | 2013 |
|---|---|---|
| Cash at bank and in hand | 1,880 | 1,089 |
| Bank deposits with maturity under 3 months | 129 | 176 |
| Cash and cash equivalents | 2,009 | 1,265 |
| Bank deposits with maturity more than 3 months | 757 | 0 |
| Total | 2,766 | 1,265 |
| Cash and cash equivalents moved to assets held for sale | 0 | -15 |
| Total | 2,766 | 1,250 |
Bank deposits include bank deposits held by OAO Fortum amounting to EUR 131 million (2013: 101). At the year end 2014 OAO Fortum's deposits included EUR 30 million in euros and EUR 101 million in Russian roubles. The funds in OAO Fortum are committed to the ongoing investment program. The bank deposits in euros held by OAO Fortum are hedging future payments in euros.
For further information regarding credit risk management and credit risks, see
Counterparty risks in the Operating and financial review
| 2014 | 2013 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Number of | Share | Number of | Share | |
| EUR million | shares | capital | shares | capital |
| Registered shares at 1 January | 888,367,045 | 3,046 | 888,367,045 | 3,046 |
| Registered shares at 31 December | 888,367,045 | 3,046 | 888,367,045 | 3,046 |
Fortum Oyj has one class of shares. By the end of 2014, a total of 888,367,045 shares had been issued. Each share entitles the holder to one vote at the Annual General Meeting. All shares entitle holders to an equal dividend. At the end of 2014 Fortum Corporation's share capital, paid in its entirety and entered in the trade register, was EUR 3,046,185,953.00.
Fortum Corporation's shares are listed on Nasdaq Helsinki. The trading code is FUM1V. Fortum Corporation's shares are in the Finnish book entry system maintained by Euroclear Finland Ltd.
Details on the President and CEO and other members of the Fortum Executive Management Team's shareholdings and interest in the equity incentive schemes is presented in Note 12 Employee benefits.
At the end of 2014, Fortum Corporation did not own its own shares and the Board of Directors of Fortum Corporation has no unused authorisations from the General Meeting of shareholders to repurchase the company's own shares.
Fortum Corporation has not issued any convertible bonds or bonds with attached warrants, which would entitle the bearer to subscribe for Fortum shares. The Board of Directors of Fortum Corporation has no unused authorisations from the General Meeting of shareholders to issue convertible bond loans or bonds with warrants or increase the company's share capital.
| EUR million | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| OAO Fortum Group | Russia | 29 | 59 |
| AS Fortum Tartu Group | Estonia | 24 | 21 |
| Other | 18 | 21 | |
| Total | 71 | 101 |
| 2014 | 2013 |
|---|---|
| 4,088 | 4,736 |
| 576 | 752 |
| 1,216 | 1,464 |
| 5,881 | 6,952 |
| 660 | 1,103 |
| 146 | 102 |
| 10 | 30 |
| 0 | 718 |
| 287 | 154 |
| 1,103 | 2,106 |
| 6,983 | 9,058 |
| 0 | -20 |
| 6,983 | 9,038 |
| Repricing | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EUR million | Effective interest rate, % |
Carrying amount 2014 |
Under 1 year |
1-5 years | Over 5 years |
Fair value 2014 |
Carrying amount 2013 |
Fair value 2013 |
| Bonds | 3.3 | 4,748 | 1,192 | 1,858 | 1,698 | 5,093 | 5,839 | 6,232 |
| Loans from financial institutions | 2.8 | 722 | 462 | 70 | 190 | 777 | 854 | 912 |
| Other long-term interest-bearing | ||||||||
| debt 2) | 1.3 | 1,226 | 1,226 | - | - | 1,296 | 1,494 | 1,515 |
| Total long-term interest-bearing | ||||||||
| debt 3) | 2.9 | 6,696 | 2,880 | 1,928 | 1,888 | 7,166 | 8,187 | 8,659 |
| Commercial papers | - | - | - | - | - | - | 718 | 719 |
| Other short-term interest-bearing debt | 0.0 | 287 | 287 | - | - | 287 | 154 | 154 |
| Total short-term interest-bearing debt |
0.0 | 287 | 287 | 0 | 0 | 287 | 871 | 873 |
| Total interest-bearing debt 4) | 2.8 | 6,983 | 3,167 | 1,928 | 1,888 | 7,453 | 9,058 | 9,532 |
1) Including interest-bearing liabilities, EUR 0 million, in Liabilities related to assets held for sale at 31 December 2014 (2013: 20).
2) Includes loans from State Nuclear Waste Management Fund and Teollisuuden Voima Oyj EUR 1,040 million (2013: 995), loans from Finnish pension institutions EUR 78 million (2013: 198) and other loans EUR 108 million (2013: 301).
3) Including current portion of long-term debt.
4) The average interest rate on loans and derivatives on 31 December 2014 was 3.7% (2013: 3.6%).
The interest-bearing debt decreased in 2014 by EUR 2,075 million to EUR 6,983 million (2013: 9,058). The amount of short-term financing decreased with EUR 584 million, and at the end of the year the amount of short-term financing was EUR 287 million (2013: 871).
In March Fortum increased the amount of re-borrowing from the Finnish nuclear waste fund and Teollisuuden Voima by EUR 45 million to EUR 1,040 million. During the first quarter Fortum repaid a maturing EUR 750 million bond. In the second quarter Fortum repaid two bonds equivalent to EUR 350 million (SEK 2,600 million and NOK 500 million) and EUR 95 million of pension loans. In the third quarter OAO Fortum repaid bilateral debt RUB 2 billion (EUR 41 million). Fortum Värme Holding prepaid SEK 1,7 billion (EUR 182 million) to Fortum Oyj who prepaid the same amount to the City of Stockholm. Both loans were originally due in December 2015.
For more information please see
Note 3 Financial risk management,
and Note 38 Contingent liabilities.
| Carrying amount |
||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Interest | Interest | Effective | Nominal | EUR | ||
| Issued/Maturity | basis | rate, % | interest, % | Currency | million | million |
| Fortum Oyj EUR 8,000 million EMTN Programme 1) | ||||||
| 2006/2016 | Fixed | 4.500 | 4.615 | EUR | 750 | 749 |
| 2009/2017 | Fixed | 6.125 | 6.240 | NOK | 500 | 55 |
| 2009/2019 | Fixed | 6.000 | 6.095 | EUR | 750 | 746 |
| Stibor | ||||||
| 2010/2015 | Floating | 3M+0.95 | SEK | 3,100 | 330 | |
| 2010/2015 | Fixed | 3.125 | 3.235 | SEK | 3,100 | 330 |
| 2011/2021 | Fixed | 4.000 | 4.123 | EUR | 500 | 528 |
| Stibor | ||||||
| 2012/2017 | Floating | 3M+1.2 | SEK | 1,000 | 106 | |
| 2012/2017 | Fixed | 3.250 | 3.260 | SEK | 1,750 | 186 |
| 2012/2022 | Fixed | 2.250 | 2.344 | EUR | 1,000 | 1,074 |
| 2013/2018 | Fixed | 2.750 | 2.855 | SEK | 1,150 | 122 |
| Stibor | ||||||
| 2013/2018 | Floating | 3M+1.0 | SEK | 3,000 | 319 | |
| Stibor | ||||||
| 2013/2023 | Floating | 3M+1.13 | SEK | 1,000 | 106 | |
| 2013/2043 | Fixed | 3.500 | 3.719 | EUR | 100 | 96 |
| Total outstanding carrying amount 31 December 2014 | 4,748 |
1) EMTN = Euro Medium Term Note
| 1 Jan | 31 Dec | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Deferred taxes in balance sheet, EUR million | 2014 | Change | 2014 |
| Deferred tax assets | 126 | -28 | 98 |
| Deferred tax liabilities | -1,338 | 179 | -1,159 |
| Net deferred taxes | -1,212 | 151 | -1,061 |
| EUR million | 1 Jan 2014 |
Charged to income state ment |
Charged to other compre hensive income |
Exchange rate differ ences reclassi fications and other changes |
Acqui sitions, disposals and assets held for sale |
31 Dec 2014 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Property, plant and equipment | -1,264 | -10 | 118 | 5 | -1,150 | |
| Pension obligations | 7 | 1 | 22 | -2 | 28 | |
| Provisions | 24 | -23 | 1 | |||
| Derivative financial instruments | -46 | -1 | 7 | -40 | ||
| Tax losses and tax credits carry-forward | 80 | -7 | -3 | 70 | ||
| Other | -13 | 44 | -1 | 30 | ||
| Net deferred taxes | -1,212 | 5 | 29 | 115 | 2 | -1,061 |
Deferred income tax assets and liabilities are offset when there is a legally enforceable right to offset current tax assets against current tax liabilities and when the deferred income taxes relate to the same fiscal authority.
Deferred income tax liabilities of EUR 8 million (2013: 7) have been recognised for the withholding tax and other taxes that would be payable on the all unremitted earnings of Estonian subsidiaries. Unremitted earnings from these companies totalled EUR 38 million on 31 December 2014 (2013: 32).
Change in deferred tax is mainly coming from exchange rate differences in Russia and in Sweden, EUR 115 million.
| 1 Jan | 31 Dec | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Deferred taxes in balance sheet, EUR million | 2013 | Change | 2013 |
| Deferred tax assets | 169 | -43 | 126 |
| Deferred tax liabilities | -1,561 | 223 | -1,338 |
| Net deferred taxes | -1,392 | 180 | -1,212 |
| EUR million |
1 Jan 2013 |
Charged to income state ment |
Charged to other compre hensive income |
Exchange rate differ ences reclassi fications and other changes |
Acqui sitions, disposals and assets held for sale |
31 Dec 2013 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Property, plant and equipment | -1,505 | 55 | 45 | 141 | -1,264 | |
| Pension obligations | 22 | 2 | -17 | 7 | ||
| Provisions | 42 | -18 | 24 | |||
| Derivative financial instruments | -29 | -9 | -8 | -46 | ||
| Tax losses and tax credits carry-forward | 80 | 80 | ||||
| Other | -2 | -12 | -13 | |||
| Net deferred taxes | -1,392 | 18 | -25 | 45 | 141 | -1,212 |
Deferred tax assets and liabilities from acquisitions, disposals and assets held for sale in 2013 relate to the sale of Fortum Sähkönsiirto Oy and Fortum Espoo Distribution Oy shares in 2014.
Deferred income tax assets are recognised for tax loss carry-forward to the extent that realisation of the related tax benefit through future profits is probable. The recognised tax assets relate to losses carry-forward with no expiration date and partly with expiry date as described below.
| 2014 | 2013 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Deferred | Deferred | |||
| Tax | tax | Tax | tax | |
| EUR million | losses | asset | losses | asset |
| Losses without expiration date | 29 | 4 | 6 | 2 |
| Losses with expiration date | 260 | 66 | 320 | 78 |
| Total | 289 | 70 | 327 | 80 |
Deferred tax assets of EUR 50 million (2013: 47) have not been recognised in the consolidated financial statements, because the realisation is not probable. The major part of the unrecognised tax asset relates to loss carry-forwards that are unlikely to be used in the foreseeable future.
| EUR million | 2014 | 2013 |
|---|---|---|
| Amounts recognised in the balance sheet | ||
| Nuclear provisions | 774 | 744 |
| Share in the State Nuclear Waste Management Fund | 774 | 744 |
| Legal liability and actual share of the State Nuclear Waste Management Fund | ||
| Liability for nuclear waste management according to the Nuclear Energy Act | 1,084 | 1,059 |
| Funding obligation target | 1,074 | 1,039 |
| Fortum's share of the State Nuclear Waste Management Fund | 1,039 | 1,005 |
According to the renewed Nuclear Energy Act Fortum submitted the proposal for the nuclear waste management liability regarding the Loviisa nuclear power plant to the Ministry of Employment and the Economy at the end of June 2013. The legal liability is calculated according to the Nuclear Energy Act in Finland and is decided by the Ministry of Employment and the Economy in December every year. The liability is based on a technical plan, which is made every third year. Following the update of technical plan in 2013, the discounted liability increased due to updated cost estimates related to interim and final storage of spent fuel.
The legal liability by the end of 2014, decided by the Ministry of Employment and the Economy and calculated according to the Nuclear Energy Act, is EUR 1,084 million (2013: 1,059). The carrying value of the nuclear provisions in the balance sheet, calculated according to IAS 37, have increased by EUR 30 million compared to 31 December 2013, totaling EUR 774 million on 31 December 2014. The main reason for the difference between the carrying value of the provision and the legal liability is the fact that the legal liability is not discounted to net present value.
| EUR million | 2014 | 2013 |
|---|---|---|
| 1 January | 744 | 678 |
| Additional provisions | 11 | 51 |
| Used during the year | -24 | -20 |
| Unwinding of discount | 43 | 35 |
| 31 December | 774 | 744 |
| Fortum's share in the State Nuclear Waste Management Fund | 774 | 744 |
According to the Nuclear Energy Act, Fortum is obligated to contribute funds in full to the State Nuclear Waste Management Fund to cover the legal liability. Based on the law, Fortum applied for periodising of the payments to the fund over three years, due to proposed increase in the legal liability. The application was approved by the Ministry ot the Employment and the Economy in December 2013.
The Fund is from an IFRS perspective overfunded with EUR 265 million (2013: 261), since Fortum's share of the Fund on 31 December 2014 is EUR 1,039 million (2013: 1,005) and the carrying value in the balance sheet is EUR 774 million (2013: 744).
Operating profit for 2014 includes a negative total adjustment of EUR -3 million (2013: +23). These adjustments are recognised in "Items affecting comparability" and are not included in comparable operating profit in the Power segment, see Note 5 Segment reporting and Note 6 Items affecting comparability. As long as the Fund stays overfunded from an IFRS perspective, positive accounting effects to operating profit will always occur when the nuclear provision is increasing more than the net payments to the Fund. Negative accounting effects will occur when the net payments to the Fund are higher than the increase of the provision.
The funding obligation target for each year is decided by the Ministry of Employment and the Economy in December each year after the legal liability has been decided. The difference between the funding obligation target for Fortum and Fortum's actual share of the State Nuclear Waste Management Fund is paid in Q1 each year.
The funding obligation target, corresponding to the new legal liability and the approved periodisation amounts to EUR 1,074 million (2013: 1,039). Real estate mortgages and other securities given also cover unexpected events according to the Nuclear Energy Act.
See also Note 35 Pledged assets
and Note 38 Contingent liabilities.
Finnish participants in the State Nuclear Waste Management Fund are allowed to borrow from the Fund according to certain rules. Fortum uses the right to borrow back and has pledged Kemijoki Oy shares as security for the loans. The loans are renewed yearly.
See also Note 28 Interest-bearing liabilities
Fortum has at year-end received updated cash flow information for its nuclear associated companies Teollisuuden Voima Oyj, OKG AB and Forsmarks Kraftgrupp AB. Based on the updated cost estimates, the effect in share of profits was EUR +2 million in 2014, which included EUR -1 million due to decrease of the carrying value of the State Nuclear Waste Management Fund in Finland. In 2013, the effect in share of profits was EUR +17 million, which included EUR -5 million due to decrease of the carrying value of the State Nuclear Waste Management Fund in Finland. The State Nuclear Waste Management Fund in Finland is overfunded from an IFRS perspective whereas the value of the Swedish Nuclear Waste Fund is estimated to be slightly below the value of provisions at year-end 2014.
Fortum has according to law given guarantees to the Finnish and Swedish nuclear Funds on behalf of the associated companies, to guarantee that sufficient funds exist to cover future expenses of decommissioning of the power plants and disposal of spent fuel.
Through the shareholding in TVO, Fortum uses the right to borrow from the Fund.
See also Note 38 Contingent liabilities.
| 2014 | 2013 | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EUR million | CSA pro vision |
Environ mental |
Other | Total | CSA pro vision |
Environ mental |
Other | Total |
| 1 January | 103 | 2 | 12 | 117 | 178 | 4 | 24 | 206 |
| Provisions for the period | 0 | 0 | 22 | 22 | 0 | 1 | 9 | 9 |
| Provisions used | -14 | 0 | -4 | -18 | -24 | -2 | -11 | -37 |
| Provisions reversed | -4 | 0 | -3 | -7 | -48 | 0 | -10 | -57 |
| Unwinding of discount | 6 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 12 | 0 | 0 | 12 |
| Exchange rate differences |
-35 | 0 | -3 | -39 | -16 | 0 | 0 | -16 |
| 31 December | 56 | 2 | 24 | 82 | 103 | 2 | 12 | 117 |
| Of which current | ||||||||
| provisions 1) | 56 | 0 | 10 | 66 | 20 | 0 | 3 | 23 |
| Of which non-current provisions |
0 | 2 | 15 | 17 | 83 | 2 | 10 | 94 |
1) Included in trade and other payables in the balance sheet, see note 34.
Fortum's extensive investment programme in Russia is subject to possible penalties that can be claimed if the new capacity is substantially delayed or agreed major terms of the capacity supply agreement (CSA) are not otherwise fulfilled. The remaining provision is assessed at each balance sheet date and the assessment is based on changes in estimated risks and timing related to commissioning of the remaining power plants in the investment programme. During 2014 EUR 4 million of the provision was reversed to the income statement relating to the lower penalties for Nyagan 2. The remaining provision for possible penalties amounts to EUR 56 million (Dec 31 2013: 103). Paid penalties during 2014 amounted to EUR 14 million (2013: 24). The provision increases due to unwinding of the discounting of potential future penalty payments, which during 2014 resulted in an increase of the provision with EUR 6 million (2013: 12). The unwinding effect is recognised in other financial expenses.
Environmental provision are mainly related to cleaning of contaminated land. Main part of the provision is estimated to be used within ten years.
Restructuring provisions, included in other provisions, amounts to EUR 1 million (2013: 2).
Other provisions include also provisions for insurance payments, tax claims and provisions for onerous contracts. The other provisions are estimated to be used within two to five years.
In Finland the most significant pension plan is the Finnish Statutory Employment Pension Scheme (TyEL) in which benefits are directly linked to employees' earnings. These pensions are funded in insurance companies and treated as defined contribution plans. The benefits provided under TyEL are old age pensions, disability pensions, unemployment pensions and survivors' pensions. Certain Fortum employees in Finland have an additional pension coverage, certain level of benefit promised after retirement, through the company's own pension fund (Fortum Pension Fund) or through insurance companies. The additional pensions through insurance companies provide old age pension and funeral grant and Fortum Pension Fund is providing old age pension, early old age benefit, disability pension, survivor's pension and funeral grant.
The Fortum Pension Fund is a closed fund managed by a Board, consisting of both employer's and employees' representatives. The Fund is operating under regulation from Financial Supervisory Authority (FSA). The liability has to be fully covered according to the regulations. The national benefit obligation related to the defined benefit plans is calculated so that the promised benefit is fully funded until retirement. After retirement the benefits payables are indexed yearly with TyEL-index. The promised benefit is defined in the rules of the Fund, mostly 66% at a maximum of the salary basis. The salary basis is an average of ten last year's salaries, which are indexed with common salary index to accounting year.
In Sweden the Group operates several defined benefit and defined contribution plans like the general ITP-pension plan and the PA-KL and PA-KFS plans that are eligible for employees within companies formerly owned by municipalities. The defined benefit plans are fully funded and have partly been financed through Fortum's own pension fund and partly through insurance premiums. The pension arrangements comprise normal retirement pension, complementary retirement pensions, survivors' pension and disability pension. The most significant pension plan is the ITP-plan for white-collar employees in permanent employment (or temporary employees after a certain waiting period), who fulfill the age conditions. To qualify for a full pension the employee must have a projected period of pensionable service, from the date of entry until retirement age, of at least 30 years.
The Swedish pension fund is managed by a Board, consisting of both employers' and employees' representatives. The fund is operating under regulation from Swedish Financial Supervisory Authority and the County Administrative Board and governed by Swedish law (no. 1967:531). The fund constitutes a security for the employer's defined benefit pension plan liability and the fund has no obligations in relation to pension payments. The employer must have a credit insurance from PRI Pensionsgaranti Mutual Insurance Company for the liability. The liability must not be fully covered by the fund according to the regulations.
The part of the ITP multiemployer pension plan that is secured by paying pension premiums to Alecta, in Fortum's case the collective family pension, is accounted for as a defined contribution plan due to that there is no consistent and reliable basis to allocate assets or liabilities to the participating entities within the ITP insurance. The reason for this is that it is not possible to determine from the terms of the plan to which extent a surplus or a deficit will affect future contributions.
Pension arrangements in Russia and Poland include payments made to the state pension fund. These arrangements are treated as defined contribution plans. In addition the Russian and Polish companies participate in certain defined benefit plans, defined by collective agreements, which are unfunded and where the company meets the benefit payment obligation as it falls due. The benefits provided under these arrangements include, in addition to pension payments, onetime benefits paid in case of employee mortality or disability as well as lump sum payments for anniversary and financial support to honored workers and pensioners.
The Norwegian companies are part of schemes that are common for municipalities in Norway. These are defined benefit pension plans and provide old age pensions, disability pension and survivor's pension, including pension benefits from the National Insurance Scheme (Folketrygden). The schemes are fully funded within the rules set out in the Norwegian insurance legislation.
In other countries the pension arrangements are done in accordance with the local legislation and practice, mostly being defined contribution plans.
Sweden - As the pension fund is separated from the funding companies Fortum is not obliged to make additional contributions to the pension fund in any case of deficit. However if the assets decrease to a level lower than the liability according to Swedish GAAP, Fortum's credit insurance cost from PRI will increase. Finland - If the return of fund's assets is not enough to cover the raise in liability and benefit payments over the financial year then the employer funds the deficit with contributions unless the fund has sufficient equity.
Sweden - The discount rate which is used to calculate the defined benefit obligation is derived from market rates on Swedish covered bonds with an equivalent duration to the pension obligation, and the company therefore has a risk in the development on the bond market. Should the market rates decrease then the liability increases.
Finland - The discount rate which is used to calculate the defined benefit obligation (according to IFRS) depends on the value of corporate bond yields as at reporting date. A decrease in yields increases the benefit obligation that is offset by increase in the value of fixed income holdings.
Finland - The pension fund's board accepts yearly an Investment Plan, which is based on the external asset-liability analysis. The assets are allocated to stocks and stock funds, fixed income instruments and real estate. The investments are diversified into different asset classes and to different asset managers taking into account the regulation of the Financial Supervisory Authority. The real estate investments consist mainly of the Fortum headquarters, rented by Fortum Oyj.
Actuarial calculations use assumptions for future inflation and salary levels and longevity. Should the actual outcome differ from these assumptions, this might lead to higher liability.
| Defined benefit obligation | Fair value of plan assets |
Net defined benefit asset(-)/liability(+) |
||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EUR million | 2014 | 2013 | 2014 | 2013 | 2014 | 2013 |
| Balance at 1 January | 466 | 550 | -415 | -430 | 51 | 119 |
| Included in profit or loss | ||||||
| Current service cost | 7 | 11 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 11 |
| Past service cost | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
| Settlements | -7 | -41 | 6 | 3 | -1 | -38 |
| Net interest 1) | 14 | 15 | -13 | -12 | 1 | 4 |
| 15 | -14 | -7 | -8 | 8 | -23 | |
| Included in OCI | ||||||
| Remeasurement gains(+)/losses(-) | 115 | -38 | -15 | -22 | 101 | -60 |
| Actuarial gains/losses arising from changes in demographic assumptions |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
| Actuarial gains/losses arising from changes in financial assumptions |
120 | -52 | 120 | -52 | ||
| Actuarial gains/losses arising from experience adjustments |
-4 | 14 | -4 | 14 | ||
| Return on plan assets (excluding amounts included in net interest expense) |
-15 | -22 | -15 | -22 | ||
| Exchange rate differences | -12 | -12 | 9 | 8 | -3 | -4 |
| 103 | -50 | -6 | -14 | 97 | -63 | |
| Other | ||||||
| Contributions paid by the employer | -2 | -6 | -2 | -6 | ||
| Benefits paid | -17 | -19 | 13 | 14 | -4 | -6 |
| Disposals of subsidiary companies | -27 | 17 | -10 | |||
| Transfer of assets in to insurance company in Sweden | 29 | 29 | ||||
| Balance at 31 December | 540 | 466 | -400 | -415 | 140 | 51 |
| Present value of funded defined obligation | 532 | 456 | ||||
| Fair value of plan assets | -400 | -415 | ||||
| Funded status | 133 | 41 | ||||
| Present value of unfunded obligation 2) | 7 | 10 | ||||
| Net liability arising from defined benefit obligation | 140 | 50 | ||||
| Defined benefit obligations included in the non-current liabilities |
140 | 50 | ||||
| Defined benefit assets included in the non-current assets | 0 | 0 | ||||
| Net defined benefit asset(-)/liability(+) presented in balance sheet |
140 | 50 |
1) Net interest is presented among financial items in income statement, the rest of costs related to defined benefit plans are included in staff costs (row defined benefits plans and part of the amount reduction due to insured defined benefit obligation in staff cost specification in Note 12 Employee benefits).
2) The unfunded obligation relates to arrangements in Russia and Poland.
At the end of 2014 a total of 1,230 (2013: 1,498) Fortum employees are included in defined benefit plans providing pension benefits. During 2014 pensions or related benefits were paid to a total of 2,929 (2013: 3,196) persons.
Contributions expected to be paid during the year 2015 are EUR 9 million.
| EUR million | 2014 | 2013 |
|---|---|---|
| Equity instruments | 129 | 169 |
| Debt instruments | 133 | 115 |
| Cash and cash equivalents | 38 | 23 |
| Real estate, of which the total EUR 67 million (2013: 74) occupied by the Group | 72 | 81 |
| Company's own ordinary shares | 5 | 5 |
| Other assets | 23 | 22 |
| Total | 400 | 415 |
When the pension plan has been financed through an insurance company, a specification of the plan assets has not been available. In these cases the fair value of plan assets has been included in other assets.
The actual return on plan assets in Finland and Sweden totalled EUR 27 million (2013: 23).
| Other | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EUR million | Finland | Sweden | countries | Total |
| Present value of funded obligations | 354 | 170 | 9 | 532 |
| Fair value of plan assets | -264 | -130 | -5 | -400 |
| Deficit(+)/surplus(-) | 90 | 39 | 3 | 133 |
| Present value of unfunded obligations | 7 | 7 | ||
| Net asset(-)/liability(+) in the balance sheet | 90 | 39 | 11 | 140 |
| Defined benefit asset included in the assets | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Pension obligations in the balance sheet | 90 | 39 | 11 | 140 |
| Other | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EUR million | Finland | Sweden | countries | Total |
| Present value of funded obligations | 281 | 136 | 38 | 456 |
| Fair value of plan assets | -262 | -127 | -25 | -415 |
| Deficit(+)/surplus(-) | 19 | 9 | 13 | 41 |
| Present value of unfunded obligations | 10 | 10 | ||
| Net asset(-)/liability(+) in the balance sheet | 19 | 9 | 23 | 50 |
| Defined benefit asset included in the assets | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Pension obligations in the balance sheet | 19 | 9 | 23 | 50 |
| 2014 | 2013 | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Finland | Sweden | Russia | Other countries |
Finland | Sweden | Russia | Other countries |
|
| Discount rate, % | 1.30 | 2.50 | 9.00 | 3.00 | 3.02 | 3.90 | 7.50 | 4.11 |
| Future salary increases, % |
2.20 | 3.00 | 7.50 | 3.25 | 2.20 | 3.00 | 7.50 | 3.72 |
| Future pension increases, % |
2.10 | 2.00 | 6.50 | 2.23 | 2.10 | 2.00 | 6.00 | 2.80 |
| Rate of inflation, % | 2.00 | 2.00 | 6.50 | 1.75 | 2.00 | 2.00 | 6.00 | 1.89 |
The discount rate in Finland is based on high quality European corporate bonds with maturity that best reflects the estimated term of the defined benefit pension plans. The discount rate in Sweden and Norway is based on yields on Swedish respectively Norwegian covered bonds with maturity that best reflects the estimated term of the defined benefit pension plans. The covered bonds in Sweden and Norway are considered high quality bonds as they are secured with assets. The discount rate in Russia is based on the yield of long-term government bonds which are consistent with the currency and the estimated term of the post-employment benefit obligations.
The life expectancy is the expected number of years of life remaining at a given age:
| Longevity at age 65 aged | Finland | Sweden |
|---|---|---|
| 45 - male | 20.6 | 21.6 |
| 45 - female | 26.4 | 24.1 |
| 65 - male | 19.0 | 19.6 |
| 65 - female | 24.7 | 22.8 |
The discount, inflation and salary growth rates used are the key assumptions used when calculating defined benefit obligations. Effects of 0.5 percentage point change in the rates to the defined benefit obligation on 31 December 2014, holding all other assumptions stable, are presented in the table below.
| Impact to the pension obligation increase+/decrease |
||
|---|---|---|
| Change in the assumption | Finland | Sweden |
| 0.5 % increase in discount rate | -8% | -11% |
| 0.5 % decrease in discount rate | 9% | 12% |
| 0.5 % increase in benefit | 7% | 10% |
| 0.5 % decrease in benefit | -6% | -9% |
| 0.5 % increase in salary growth rate | 1% | 3% |
| 0.5 % decrease in salary growth rate | -1% | -3% |
The methods used in preparing the sensitivity analysis did not change compared to the previous period. Change in mortality basis so that life expectancy increases by one year would increase net liability in Finland and Sweden with EUR 21 million (16.6%).
| EUR million | Future benefit payments |
|---|---|
| Maturity under 1 year | 16 |
| Maturity between 1 and 5 years | 71 |
| Maturity between 5 and 10 years | 93 |
| Maturity between 10 and 20 years | 180 |
| Maturity between 20 and 30 years | 145 |
| Maturity over 30 years | 120 |
The weighted average duration of defined benefit obligation in Finland and Sweden at the end of the 2014 is 16.9 years.
| EUR million | 2014 | 2013 |
|---|---|---|
| Connection fees | 110 | 417 |
| Other liabilities | 44 | 38 |
| Moved to assets held for sale | 0 | -306 |
| Total | 154 | 148 |
Refundable connection fees to the district heating network in Finland amounted to EUR 110 million (2013: 111).
| EUR million | 2014 | 2013 |
|---|---|---|
| Trade payables | 298 | 386 |
| Accrued expenses and deferred income | ||
| Accrued personnel expenses | 71 | 73 |
| Accrued interest expenses | 205 | 254 |
| Other accrued expenses and deferred income | 64 | 79 |
| Other liabilities | ||
| VAT-liability | 35 | 26 |
| Current tax liability | 35 | 11 |
| Energy taxes | 12 | 31 |
| Advances received | 33 | 52 |
| Current provisions 1) | 66 | 23 |
| Other liabilities | 69 | 132 |
| Moved to assets held for sale | 0 | -73 |
| Total | 888 | 994 |
1) See also Note 31 Other provisions.
The management considers that the amount of trade and other payables approximates fair value.
| EUR million | 2014 | 2013 |
|---|---|---|
| On own behalf | ||
| For debt | ||
| Pledges | 292 | 301 |
| Real estate mortages | 137 | 137 |
| For other commitments | ||
| Real estate mortages | 137 | 103 |
| On behalf of associated companies and joint ventures | ||
| Pledges and real estate mortgages | 0 | 3 |
Finnish participants in the State Nuclear Waste Management Fund are allowed to borrow from the fund. Fortum has pledged shares in Kemijoki Oy as a security. The value of the pledged shares is unchanged, EUR 269 million on 31 December 2014 (2013: 269).
Pledges also include bank deposits as trading collateral of EUR 3 million (2013: 12) for trading of electricity and CO2 emission allowances in Nasdaq Commodities, in Intercontinental Exchange (ICE) and European Energy Exchange (EEX).
Fortum Tartu in Estonia (60% owned by Fortum) has given real estate mortgages for a value of EUR 96 million (2013: 96) as a security for an external loan. Real estate mortgages have also been given for loans from Fortum's pension fund for EUR 41 million (2013: 41).
Regarding the relevant interest-bearing liabilities, see Note 28 Interest-bearing liabilities.
Fortum has given real estate mortgages in power plants in Finland for a value of EUR 137 million (2013: 103) as a security to the Ministry of Employment and Economy for the uncovered part of the legal liability and unexpected events relating to costs for future decommissioning and disposal of spent fuel in the wholly owned Loviisa nuclear power plant. The size of the securities given is updated every year in June, based on the decisions regarding the legal liabilities and the funding target which takes place around year-end every year. Due to the yearly update, the amount of real estate mortgages given as a security increased by EUR 34 million.
See also Note 30 Nuclear related assets and liabilities and note 38 Contingent liabilities.
The operating rental income recognised in income statement was EUR 1 million (2013: 1).
| EUR million | 2014 | 2013 |
|---|---|---|
| Not later than 1 year | 2 | 6 |
| Later than 1 year and not later than 5 years | 4 | 1 |
| Later than 5 years | 1 | 2 |
| Total | 8 | 9 |
| EUR million | 2014 | 2013 |
|---|---|---|
| Acquisition cost | 4 | 4 |
| Accumulated depreciation at 1 January | -1 | -1 |
| Depreciation charge for the year | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 3 | 2 |
Fortum does not have material finance lease arrangements where where the Group is leasing out assets.
Fortum leases office equipment and cars under various non-cancellable operating leases, some of which contain renewal options. The future costs for noncancellable operating lease contracts are stated below. Lease rental expenses amounting to EUR 16 million (2013: 28) are included in the income statement in other expenses. Future minimum lease payments include land leases with long lease periods.
| EUR million | 2014 | 2013 |
|---|---|---|
| Not later than 1 year | 24 | 27 |
| Later than 1 year and not later than 5 years | 43 | 47 |
| Later than 5 years | 76 | 108 |
| Total | 142 | 181 |
Fortum does not have material finance lease arrangements where the Group is leasing in assets.
| EUR million | 2014 | 2013 |
|---|---|---|
| Property, plant and equipment | 458 | 524 |
| Intangible assets | 3 | 6 |
| Total | 461 | 530 |
Capital commitments are capital expenditure contracted for at the balance sheet date but not recognised in the financial statements. Capital commitments have decreased compared to year-end 2013. The decrease comes mainly from progressing of OAO Fortum's investment programme and divestments of the Finnish and Norweigan distribution businesses.
For more information regarding capital expenditure, see Note 19 Property, plant and equipment.
| EUR million | 2014 | 2013 |
|---|---|---|
| On own behalf | ||
| Other contingent liabilities | 64 | 77 |
| On behalf of associated companies and joint ventures | ||
| Guarantees | 459 | 514 |
| Other contingent liabilities | 125 | 125 |
| On behalf of others | ||
| Guarantees | 0 | 3 |
Other contingent liabilities on own behalf contain various contingent liabilities for group companies, EUR 64 million in 2014 (2013: 77).
Guarantees and other contingent liabilities on behalf of associated companies and joint ventures mainly consist of guarantees relating to Fortum's associated nuclear companies Teollisuuden Voima Oyj (TVO), Forsmarks Kraftgrupp AB (FKA) and OKG AB (OKG). The guarantees are given in proportion to Fortum's respective ownership in each of these companies.
According to law, nuclear companies operating in Finland and Sweden shall give securities to the Finnish State Nuclear Waste Management Fund and the Swedish Nuclear Waste Fund respectively, to guarantee that sufficient funds exist to cover future expenses of decommissioning of the power plant and disposal of spent fuel. In Finland, Fortum has given a guarantee on behalf of TVO to the Finnish State Nuclear Waste Management Fund to cover Fortum's part of TVO's uncovered part of the legal liability and for unexpected events. The amount of guarantees is updated every year in June based on the legal liability decided in December the previous year. Due to the yearly update, the amount of guarantees given were EUR 41 million (2013: 40).
In Sweden, Fortum has given guarantees on behalf of FKA and OKG to the Swedish Nuclear Waste Fund to cover Fortum's part of FKA's and OKG's liability. The guarantees for 2012-2014 were decided in December 2011 by the Swedish government and they became effective from September 2012. The total amount of guarantees for FKA and OKG amount to SEK 3,696 million (EUR 393 million) at year-end 2014 (2013: EUR 417 million).
Meri-Pori power plant in Finland is owned by Fortum 54.55% and TVO 45.45%. Based on the participation agreement Fortum has to give a guarantee to TVO against possible loss of asset or breach in contract of TVO's share of the asset, EUR 125 million (2013: 125).
Fortum's 100% owned subsidiary Fortum Heat and Gas Oy has a collective contingent liability with Neste Oil Oyj of the in 2004 demerged Fortum Oil and Gas Oy's liabilities based on the Finnish Companies Act's (734/1978) Chapter 14a Paragraph 6.
The Swedish Energy Authority (EI), which regulates and supervises the distribution network tariffs in Sweden, has issued a decision concerning the allowed income frame for the years 2012-2015. EI has based its decision on a model with a transition rule stating that it takes 18 years to reach the allowed level of income. The EI decision has been appealed to the County Administrative Court by more than 80 distribution companies, including Fortum Distribution AB. The basis for Fortum Distribution AB's appeal is that the model is not compatible with the existing legislation and that EI has applied an incorrect method for the calculation of Weighted Average Cost of Capital (WACC). In December 2013, the court decided in favor of the industry on all major topics. However, the decision has been appealed by EI to the next level, the Administrative Court of Appeal. In November 2014, the Administrative Court of Appeal, the second lawcourt, ruled in favour of the Swedish network companies. In December 2014, however, EI decided to appeal this decision to the next and final law-court, the Supreme Administrative Court. For the case to be reconsidered, it is required that the Supreme Administrative Court grants a leave to appeal. A decision whether to grant such a leave will be made during the spring 2015.
Fortum received income tax assessments in Sweden for the years 2009, 2010, 2011 and 2012 in December 2011, December 2012, December 2013 and October 2014, respectively. According to the tax authorities, Fortum would have to pay additional income taxes for the years 2009, 2010, 2011 and 2012 for the reallocation of loans between the Swedish subsidiaries in 2004-2005, as well as additional income taxes for the years 2010, 2011 and 2012 for financing of the acquisition of TGC 10 (current OAO Fortum) in 2008. The claims are based on a change in tax regulation as of 2009. Fortum considers the claims unjustifiable and has appealed the decisions. The cases are pending before the Administrative Court. In January 2015 the Swedish tax authority announced to the Administrative Court that it has abandoned its claim regarding the year 2010 with respect to financing the acquisition of TGC 10.
Based on legal analysis and supporting legal opinions, no provision has been recognised in the financial statements. If the decisions by the tax authority remain final despite the appeals processes, the impact on net profit would be approximately SEK 425 million (EUR 45 million) for the year 2009, approximately SEK 379 million (EUR 40 million) for the year 2010, approximately SEK 511 million (EUR 54 million) for the year 2011 and approximately SEK 173 million (EUR 18 million) for the year 2012.
Fortum has received income tax assessments in Belgium for the years 2008, 2009, 2010 and 2011. Tax authorities disagree with the tax treatment of Fortum EIF NV. Fortum finds the tax authorities' interpretation not to be based on the local regulation and has appealed the decisions. The court of First instance in Antwerpen rejected Fortum's appeal for the years 2008 and 2009 in June 2014. Fortum finds the decision unjustifiable and has appealed to the Court of Appeal. Based on legal analysis and a supporting legal opinion, no provision has been accounted for in the financial statements. If the decision of the tax authorities remain final despite the appeal process, the impact on the net profit would be approximately EUR 36 million for the year 2008, approximately EUR 27 million for the year 2009, approximately EUR 15 million for the year 2010 and approximately EUR 21 million for the year 2011.The tax has already been paid. If the appeal is approved, Fortum will receive a 7% interest on the amount.
Fortum received an income tax assessment in Finland for 2007 in December 2013. Tax authorities claim in the transfer pricing audit, that detailed business decisions are done by Fortum Oyj and therefore re-characterize the equity Fortum has injected to its Belgium subsidiary Fortum Project Finance NV not to be equity, but funds to be available for the subsidiary. Tax authorities' view is that the interest income that Fortum Project Finance NV received from its loans should be taxed in Finland, not Belgium. Fortum considered the claims unjustifiable both for legal grounds and interpretation. Fortum appealed the decision.
The Board of Adjustment of the Large Taxpayers' Office approved Fortum's appeal for the year 2007 on 21 August 2014. The Board of Adjustment's decision is in line with the principle adopted in the Supreme Administrative Court's precedent in June 2014, according to which, under transfer pricing rules, the nature of business cannot be re-characterized for tax purposes, but can only adjust the pricing of goods or services. Despite the new precedent, the Tax Recipients' Legal Services Unit within the tax authorities has appealed this decision to the Administrative Court in Helsinki. If the appeal of the Tax Recipients' Legal Services Unit would be successful in court, the impact on net profit would be approximately EUR 136 million for the year 2007. Based on legal analysis and a supporting legal opinion, no provision has been accounted for in the financial statements.
In December 2014 Fortum Oyj received a non-taxation decision from the large Taxpayers' office for the years 2008-2011 regarding the activities in the Belgian and Dutch financing companies. The decision was given due to the transfer pricing audit carried out in 2013-2014 and was in line with the Board of Adjustment's decision with respect to Fortum for the year 2007. The Tax Recipients' Legal Services Unit has the right to appeal the decisions.
In addition to the litigations described above, some Group companies are involved in other routine tax and other disputes incidental to their normal conduct of business. Based on the information currently available, management does not consider the liabilities arising out of such litigations likely to be material to the Group's financial position.
In Finland Fortum is participating in the country's fifth nuclear power plant unit, Olkiluoto 3 (OL3), through the shareholding in Teollisuuden Voima Oyj (TVO) with an approximately 25% share representing some 400 MW in capacity. The civil construction works of the Olkiluoto 3 plant unit have been mainly completed, and the reactor main components are installed. Reactor containment pressure and leak-tightness tests have been completed. Instrumentation and control system tests in the test bay in Erlangen, Germany continued alongside planning and licensing. In September 2014 TVO received additional data about the schedule for the OL3 project from the Supplier, AREVA-Siemens. According to this data, the start of regular electricity production of the plant unit will take place in late 2018. Detailed evaluation of the received data is ongoing.
In December 2008 the OL3 Supplier initiated the International Chamber of Commerce (ICC) arbitration proceedings and submitted a claim concerning the delay and the ensuing costs incurred at the Olkiluoto 3 project. The updated quantification which the Supplier submitted in October 2014 and corrected in November 2014 brings the total amount claimed by the Supplier for events occurring during the construction period ending June 2011 to approximately EUR 3.4 billion.
In 2012, TVO submitted a counter-claim and defense in the matter. The quantification estimate of TVO's costs and losses updated in October 2014 is approximately EUR 2.3 billion until the end of 2018, which according to the schedule submitted by the OL3 Supplier in September 2014, is the estimated start of the regular electricity production of OL3.
The companies belonging to the Plant Supplier Consortium (AREVA GmbH, AREVA NP SAS and Siemens) are jointly and severally liable of the Plant Contract obligations.
The arbitration proceedings may continue for several years and the claimed amounts may change.
At the end of 2014, the Finnish State owned 50.76% of the Company's shares. The Finnish Parliament has authorised the Government to reduce the Finnish State's holding in Fortum Corporation to no less than 50.1% of the share capital and voting rights.
All transactions between Fortum and other companies owned by the Finnish State are on arms length basis. In the ordinary course of business Fortum engages in transactions on commercial terms with associated companies and other related parties, which are on same terms as they would be for third parties, except for some associates as discussed later in this note.
In November 2014 Fortum sold its 31 %-shareholding in the Finnish natural gas company Gasum Oy to the Finnish State.
See further information on the disposal in note 8 Acquisitions and disposals
The key management personnel of the Fortum Group are the members of Fortum Executive Management Team and the Board of Directors. Fortum has not been involved in any material transactions with members of the Board of Directors or Fortum Executive Management Team. No loans exist to any member of the Board of Directors or Fortum Executive Management Team at 31 December 2014. The total compensation (including pension benefits and social costs) for the key management personnel for 2014 was EUR 9 million (2013: 8).
Fortum owns shareholdings in associated companies and joint ventures which in turn own hydro and nuclear power plants. Under the consortium agreements, each owner is entitled to electricity in proportion to its share of ownership or other agreements. Each owner is liable for an equivalent portion of costs regardless of output. These associated companies are not profit making, since the owners purchase electricity at production cost including interest costs and production taxes, which generally is lower than market price.
For further information on transactions and balances with associated companies and joint ventures, see Note 20 Participations in associated companies and joint ventures.
The Fortum pension funds in Finland and Sweden are stand-alone legal entities which manage pension assets related to the part of the pension coverage in Sweden and Finland. The assets in the pension fund in Finland include Fortum shares representing 0.03% (2013: 0.03%) of the company's outstanding shares. Real estate and premises owned by the Finnish pension fund have been leased to Fortum. Fortum has not paid contributions to the pension funds in 2014 nor in 2013. Real estate mortgages have also been given for loans from Fortum's pension fund for EUR 41 million (2013: 41).
On 22 January 2015, it was announced that Tapio Kuula, President and CEO of Fortum Corporation, will go on a disability pension starting 1 February 2015. Tapio Kuula has been the President and CEO of Fortum Corporation since 2009. Fortum's Board has started the search process for a new CEO covering internal and external candidates. In the meanwhile, Timo Karttinen, CFO of Fortum will also act as interim President and CEO.
● = Power and Technology 1) Founded during the year
= Heat, Electricity Sales and Solutions 2) Shares held by the parent company
▲ = Distribution
| Group | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Company name | Domicile | Segment | holding, % | |
| Findis Oy | 2) | Finland | ▼ | 100.0 |
| Fortum Asiakaspalvelu Oy | 2) | Finland | ■ | 100.0 |
| Fortum Assets Oy | Finland | ▼ | 100.0 | |
| Fortum C&H Oy | Finland | ▼ | 100.0 | |
| Fortum Growth Oy | Finland | ▼ | 100.0 | |
| Fortum Heat and Gas Oy | 2) | Finland | ● ■▼ | 100.0 |
| Fortum Hyötytuotanto Oy | Finland | ● | 100.0 | |
| Fortum Markets Oy | 2) | Finland | ■ | 100.0 |
| Fortum Norm Oy | 2) | Finland | ▼ | 100.0 |
| Fortum Nuclear Services Oy | Finland | ● | 100.0 | |
| Fortum Power and Heat Oy | 2) | Finland | ● ■▼ | 100.0 |
| Kiinteistö Oy Espoon Energiatalo | Finland | ▼ | 100.0 | |
| Koillis-Pohjan Energiantuotanto Oy | Finland | ● | 100.0 | |
| KPPV-Sijoitus Oy | Finland | ▼ | 100.0 | |
| Lounais-Suomen Lämpö Oy | Finland | ▼ | 100.0 | |
| Oy Pauken Ab | Finland | ▼ | 100.0 | |
| Oy Tersil Ab | Finland | ▼ | 100.0 | |
| Oy Tertrade Ab | Finland | ▼ | 100.0 | |
| Varsinais-Suomen Sähkö Oy | Finland | ▼ | 100.0 | |
| Fortum Project Finance N.V. | 2) | Belgium | ▼ | 100.0 |
| Fortum Energi A/S | Denmark | ■ | 100.0 | |
| AS Anne Soojus | Estonia | ■ | 60.0 | |
| AS Fortum Tartu | Estonia | ■ | 60.0 |
| AS Tartu Joujaam | Estonia | ■ | 60.0 |
|---|---|---|---|
| AS Tartu Keskkatlamaja | Estonia | ■ | 60.0 |
| Fortum CFS Eesti OU | Estonia | ▼ | 100.0 |
| Fortum Eesti AS | Estonia | ■ | 100.0 |
| Fortum France S.A.S | France | ● | 100.0 |
| Fortum Service Deutschland GmbH | Germany | ● | 100.0 |
| Fortum Insurance Ltd | Guernsey | ▼ | 100.0 |
| Fortum Energy Ltd | Great Britain | ▼ | 100.0 |
| Fortum O&M(UK) Limited | Great Britain | ● | 100.0 |
| IVO Energy Limited | Great Britain | ● | 100.0 |
| Fortum Amrit Energy Private Limited | India | ■ | 100.0 |
| Fortum FinnSurya Energy Private Limited | India | ■ | 100.0 |
| Fortum India Private Limited | India | ■ | 100.0 |
| Fortum Tarapur Heat Private Limited | India | ■ | 100.0 |
| Fortum C&P Unlimited | Ireland | ▼ | 100.0 |
| 2) Fortum Finance Ireland Limited |
Ireland | ▼ | 100.0 |
| Fortum Jelgava, SIA | Latvia | ■ | 100.0 |
| Fortum Latvia SIA | Latvia | ■ | 100.0 |
| UAB Fortum Ekosiluma | Lithuania | ■ | 100.0 |
| UAB Fortum Heat Lietuva | Lithuania | ■ | 100.0 |
| 1) UAB Fortum Kaunas |
Lithuania | ■ | 100.0 |
| UAB Fortum Klaipeda | Lithuania | ■ | 95.0 |
| UAB Joniskio energija | Lithuania | ■ | 66.0 |
| UAB Svencioniu energija | Lithuania | ■ | 50.0 |
| Fortum Baltic Investments SNC | Luxemburg | ■ | 100.0 |
| Fortum Investment SARL | Luxemburg | ▼ | 100.0 |
| Fortum L.A.M SNC. | Luxemburg | ■ | 100.0 |
| Fortum Luxembourg SARL | Luxemburg | ▼ | 100.0 |
| Fortum Sendi Prima Sdn Bhd | Malaysia | ● | 100.0 |
| Fortum Förvaltning AS | Norway | ▼ | 100.0 |
| Fortum Markets AS | Norway | ■ | 100.0 |
| Fortum Bytom SA | Poland | ■ | 99.8 |
| Fortum Power and Heat Polska Sp.z.o.o | Poland | ● ■▼ | 100.0 |
| Fortum Zabrze SA | Poland | ■ | 99.2 |
| Rejonowa Spółka Ciepłownicza Sp. z o.o. | Poland | ■ | 99.8 |
| Chelyabinsk Energoremont | Russia | □ | 98.2 |
| LLC Fortum Energy OOO Fortum Energija | Russia | □ | 100.0 |
| OAO Fortum | Russia | □ | 98.2 |
| Tobolsk CHP Limited Liability Company | Russia | □ | 98.2 |
| Urals Heat Network | Russia | □ | 98.2 |
| Blybergs Kraftaktiebolag | Sweden | ● | 66.7 |
| Brännälven Kraft AB | Sweden | ● | 67.0 |
| Bullerforsens Kraft Aktiebolag | Sweden | ● | 88.0 |
| Energikundservice Sverige AB | Sweden | ▼ | 100.0 |
| Fortum 1 AB | Sweden | □ | 100.0 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fortum AMCO AB | Sweden | ▼ | 100.0 |
| Fortum Dalälvens Kraft AB | Sweden | ● | 100.0 |
| Fortum Distribution AB | Sweden | ▲ | 100.0 |
| Fortum Fastigheter AB | Sweden | ▼ | 100.0 |
| Fortum Generation AB | Sweden | ● | 100.0 |
| Fortum Indalskraft AB | Sweden | ● | 100.0 |
| Fortum Ljunga Kraft AB | Sweden | ● | 100.0 |
| Fortum Ljusnans Kraft AB | Sweden | ● | 100.0 |
| Fortum Markets AB | Sweden | ■ | 100.0 |
| 2) Fortum Nordic AB |
Sweden | ▼ | 100.0 |
| Fortum Power and Heat AB | Sweden | ● | 100.0 |
| Fortum Produktionsnät AB | Sweden | ● | 100.0 |
| 2) Fortum Sweden AB |
Sweden | ▼ | 100.0 |
| Fortum Vind Norr AB | Sweden | ● | 100.0 |
| Fortum Älvkraft i Värmland AB | Sweden | ● | 100.0 |
| Laforsen Produktionsnät Aktiebolag | Sweden | ▲ | 80.0 |
| Mellansvensk Kraftgrupp Aktiebolag | Sweden | ● | 86.9 |
| Oreälvens Kraftaktiebolag | Sweden | ● | 65.0 |
| Uddeholm Kraft Aktiebolag | Sweden | ● | 100.0 |
| Värmlandskraft-OKG-delägarna Aktiebolag | Sweden | ● | 73.3 |
| FB Generation Services B.V. | The Netherlands | ● | 75.0 |
| 1) Fortum 1 B.V. |
The Netherlands | ▼ | 100.0 |
| 1) Fortum 2 B.V. |
The Netherlands | ▼ | 100.0 |
| 1) Fortum 3 B.V. |
The Netherlands | ▼ | 100.0 |
| 1) Fortum 4 B.V. |
The Netherlands | ▼ | 100.0 |
| Fortum Finance II B.V. | The Netherlands | ▼ | 100.0 |
| 2) Fortum Holding B.V. |
The Netherlands | ▼ | 100.0 |
| 1) Fortum Hydro B.V. |
The Netherlands | ● | 100.0 |
| Fortum India B.V. | The Netherlands | ▼ | 100.0 |
| Fortum India Industry B.V. | The Netherlands | ▼ | 100.0 |
| Fortum Power Holding B.V. | The Netherlands | ● | 100.0 |
| Fortum Russia B.V. | The Netherlands | □ | 100.0 |
| Fortum Russia Holding B.V. | The Netherlands | □ | 100.0 |
| Fortum SAR B.V. | The Netherlands | ▼ | 100.0 |
| Fortum Sun B.V. | The Netherlands | ▼ | 100.0 |
| Fortum Wave Power B.V. | The Netherlands | ● | 100.0 |
| 1) PolarSolar B.V. |
The Netherlands | ■ | 100.0 |
| 1) RPH Investment B.V. |
The Netherlands | □ | 100.0 |
| EUR million | Note | 2014 | 2013 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sales | 2 | 76 | 84 |
| Other income | 3 | 1,959 | 7 |
| Employee costs | 4 | -35 | -33 |
| Depreciation, amortisation and write-downs | 7 | -9 | -9 |
| Other expenses | -72 | -60 | |
| Operating profit | 1,919 | -11 | |
| Financial income and expenses | 5 | -129 | -16 |
| Profit after financial items | 1,790 | -27 | |
| Group contributions 1) | 565 | 608 | |
| Profit before income tax | 2,355 | 581 | |
| Income tax expense | 6 | -90 | -104 |
| Profit for the period | 2,265 | 477 |
1) Taxable profits transferred from Finnish subsidiaries.
| EUR million Note |
31 Dec 2014 | 31 Dec 2013 |
|---|---|---|
| ASSETS | ||
| Non-current assets | ||
| Intangible assets 7 |
18 | 15 |
| Property, plant and equipment 7 |
4 | 13 |
| Investments in group companies 7 |
16,057 | 16,215 |
| Investments in associated companies 7 |
6 | 0 |
| Interest-bearing receivables from group companies 7 |
1,368 | 2,382 |
| Interest-bearing receivables from associated companies 7 |
211 | 1 |
| Other non-current assets 7 |
2 | 5 |
| Deferred tax assets | 2 | 4 |
| Total non-current assets | 17,668 | 18,635 |
| Current assets | ||
| Other current receivables from group companies 8 |
586 | 630 |
| Other current receivables from associated companies 8 |
1 | 0 |
| Other current receivables 8 |
170 | 11 |
| Bank deposits 9 |
505 | 0 |
| Cash and cash equivalents 9 |
1,813 | 1,059 |
| Liquid funds | 2,318 | 1,059 |
| Total current assets | 3,075 | 1,700 |
| Total assets | 20,743 | 20,335 |
| EQUITY | ||
| Shareholders' equity 10 |
||
| Share capital | 3,046 | 3,046 |
| Share premium | 2,822 | 2,822 |
| Retained earnings | 3,174 | 3,674 |
| Profit for the period | 2,265 | 477 |
| Total shareholders' equity | 11,307 | 10,019 |
| Provisions for liabilities and charges | 0 | 0 |
| LIABILITIES | ||
| Non-current liabilities | ||
| External interest-bearing liabilities 11 |
5,269 | 6,351 |
| Interest-bearing liabilities to group companies 11 |
2,648 | 1,470 |
| Interest-bearing liabilities to associated companies 11 |
261 | 247 |
| Other non-current liabilities | 3 | 2 |
| Total non-current liabilities | 8,181 | 8,070 |
| Current liabilities | ||
| External interest-bearing liabilities 11 |
1,083 | 2,025 |
| Trade and other payables to group companies 12 |
31 | 25 |
| Trade and other payables to associated companies 12 |
3 | 2 |
| Trade and other payables 12 |
138 | 194 |
| Total current liabilities | 1,255 | 2,246 |
| Total liabilities | 9,436 | 10,316 |
| Total equity and liabilities | 20,743 | 20,335 |
| EUR million | 2014 | 2013 |
|---|---|---|
| Cash flow from operating activities | ||
| Profit for the period | 2,265 | 477 |
| Adjustments: | ||
| Income tax expense | 90 | 104 |
| Group contributions | -565 | -608 |
| Finance costs - net | 129 | 16 |
| Depreciations, amortisation and write-downs | 9 | 9 |
| Operating profit before depreciations | 1,928 | -2 |
| Non-cash flow items and divesting activities | -1,940 | 1 |
| Interest and other financial income | 45 | 60 |
| Interest and other financial expenses paid | -168 | -229 |
| Dividend income | 0 | 210 |
| Group contribution received | 609 | 574 |
| Realised foreign exchange gains and losses | -283 | -149 |
| Taxes | -127 | -87 |
| Funds from operations | 64 | 378 |
| Other short-term receivables increase(-)/decrease(+) | -6 | -5 |
| Other short-term payables increase(+)/decrease(-) | -9 | -40 |
| Change in working capital | -15 | -45 |
| Net cash from operating activities | 49 | 333 |
| Cash flow from investing activities | ||
| Capital expenditures | -5 | -9 |
| Acquisition of shares and capital contributions in subsidiaries | 0 | -19 |
| Acquisition of shares in associated companies | -3 | 0 |
| Capital returns from subsidiaries | 0 | 210 |
| Acquisition of other shares | -2 | -2 |
| Proceeds from sales of fixed assets | 0 | 0 |
| Proceeds from sales of shares in subsidiaries | 2,093 | 0 |
| Change in interest-bearing receivables and other non-current assets | 793 | -836 |
| Net cash used in investing activities | 2,876 | -656 |
| Cash flow before financing activities | 2,925 | -323 |
| Cash flow from financing activities | ||
| Proceeds from long-term liabilities | 46 | 759 |
| Payment of long-term liabilities | -1,340 | -526 |
| Change in cashpool liabilities | 1,178 | 917 |
| Change in short-term liabilities | -573 | 406 |
| Dividends paid | -977 | -888 |
| Net cash used in financing activities | -1,666 | 668 |
| Net increase(+)/decrease(-) in liquid funds | 1,259 | 345 |
| Liquid funds at the beginning of the period | 1,059 | 714 |
| Liquid funds at the end of the period | 2,318 | 1,059 |
The financial statements of Fortum Oyj are prepared in accordance with Finnish Accounting Standards (FAS).
Sales include sales revenue from actual operations and exchange rate differences on trade receivables, less discounts and indirect taxes such as value added tax.
Other income includes gains on the sales of property, plant and equipment and shareholdings, as well as all other operating income not related to the sales of products or services, such as rents.
Transactions denominated in foreign currencies have been valued using the exchange rate at the date of the transaction. Receivables and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies outstanding on the balance sheet date have been valued using the exchange rate quoted on the balance sheet date. Exchange rate differences have been entered in the financial net in the income statement.
Fortum Oyj enters into derivative contracts mainly for hedging foreign exchange and interest rate exposures.
Derivatives used to hedge balance sheet items and other foreign currency positions are valued employing the exchange rate quoted on the balance sheet date and gains or losses are recognised in the income statement in the financial net. The interest element on forward contracts is accrued for the period.
Option premiums are treated as advances paid or received until the option matures, and any losses on options entered into other than for hedging purposes are entered as an expense in the income statement.
Interest income or expense for derivatives used to hedge the interest rate risk exposure is accrued over the period to maturity and is recognised as an adjustment to the interest expense of the liabilities.
Income taxes presented in the income statement consist of accrued taxes for the financial year and tax adjustments for prior years.
The balance sheet value of shares in group companies consists of historical costs less write-downs. If the estimated future cash flows generated by a non current asset are expected to be permanently lower than the balance of the carrying amount, an adjustment to the value must be made to write-down the difference as an expense. If the basis for the write-down can no longer be justified at the balance sheet date, it must be reversed.
The balance sheet value of property, plant and equipment consists of historical costs less depreciation and other deductions. Property, plant and equipment are depreciated using straight-line depreciation based on the expected useful life of the asset.
| Buildings and structures | 15 – 40 years |
|---|---|
| Machinery and equipment | 3 – 15 years |
| Other intangible assets | 5 – 10 years |
Statutory pension obligations are covered through a compulsory pension insurance policy or Group's own pension fund. Payments to Group's pension fund are recorded in the income statement in amounts determined by the pension fund according to the actuarial assumptions pursuant to the Finnish Employees' Pension Act.
Costs related to the Fortum long-term incentive plans are accrued over the plan period and the related liability is booked to the balance sheet.
Foreseeable future expenses and losses that have no corresponding revenue to which Fortum is committed or obliged to settle, and whose monetary value can be reasonably assessed, are entered as expenses in the income statement and included as provisions in the balance sheet.
Information presented in the notes is given seperately for Fortum Group companies and for associated companies of the Group.
Fortum Group implemented new IFRS standards starting from 1 January 2014. This changed the status of AB Fortum Värme samägt med Stockholm Stad in the consolidated accounts from subsidiary to joint venture. The parent company financial statements reflect the reclassification from 1 January 2014 onwards and the comparative period information has not been restated.
| EUR million | 2014 | 2013 |
|---|---|---|
| Finland | 52 | 65 |
| Other countries | 24 | 19 |
| Total | 76 | 84 |
| EUR million | 2014 | 2013 |
|---|---|---|
| Gain on sales of shareholdings | 1,940 | 0 |
| Rental and other income | 19 | 7 |
| Total | 1,959 | 7 |
| EUR million | 2014 | 2013 |
|---|---|---|
| Personnel expenses | ||
| Wages, salaries and remunerations | 28 | 26 |
| Indirect employee costs | ||
| Pension costs | 5 | 5 |
| Other indirect employee costs | 1 | 1 |
| Other personnel expenses | 1 | 1 |
| Total | 35 | 33 |
| EUR thousands | 2014 | 2013 |
| Compensation for the President and CEO | ||
| Salaries and fringe benefits 1) | 1,005 | 795 |
| Performance bonuses 2) | 127 | 22 |
| Share-based remuneration | 235 | 448 |
| Pensions (statutory) | 188 | 137 |
| Pensions (voluntary) | 255 | 204 |
Social security expenses 57 48 Total 1,867 1,654
1) Amount is impacted by the sick leave during 2013.
2) Performance bonuses are based on estimated amounts.
Compensation above is presented on accrual basis. Paid salaries and remunerations for the President and CEO in 2014 were EUR 1,592 thousands (2013: 1,784).
Timo Karttinen, who assumed responsibility for the duties of the President and CEO during Tapio Kuula's sick leave in December 2014, did not receive any compensation during 2014 for these additional duties.
In 2013 a compensation of EUR 80 thousands was paid to Markus Rauramo for assuming the duties of the President and CEO during March-November 2013.
For the President and CEO Tapio Kuula the retirement age of old-age pension is 63. The pension obligations are covered through insurance company.
Board members are not in an employment relationship or service contract with Fortum, and they are not given the opportunity to participate in Fortum's bonus or share bonus systems, nor does Fortum have a pension plan that they can opt to take part in.
See also Note 12 Employee benefits and
Note 32 Pension obligations in the Consolidated financial statements.
| 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|
| Average number of employees | 301 | 326 |
| EUR million | 2014 | 2013 |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend income from group companies | 0 | 210 |
| Dividend income from associated companies and other companies | 0 | 0 |
| Interest and other financial income from group companies | 24 | 27 |
| Interest and other financial income from associated companies | 9 | - |
| Write-downs of participations in group companies | 0 | -44 |
| Interest and other financial income | 10 | 13 |
| Exchange rate differences | 2 | 1 |
| Interest and other financial expenses to group companies | -5 | -8 |
| Interest and other financial expenses | -169 | -215 |
| Total | -129 | -16 |
| Total interest income and expenses | ||
| Interest income | 43 | 40 |
| Interest expenses | -170 | -219 |
| Interest net | -127 | -179 |
Write-downs of participations in group companies are related to shares in Fortum Heat and Gas Oy and received dividend payments. Interest and other financial income fromjoint venture is related to AB Fortum Värme samägt med Stockholm Stad.
| EUR million | 2014 | 2013 |
|---|---|---|
| Taxes on regular business operations | -23 | -45 |
| Taxes on group contributions | 113 | 149 |
| Total | 90 | 104 |
| Current taxes for the period | 81 | 103 |
| Current taxes for prior periods | 7 | 0 |
| Changes in deferred tax | 2 | 1 |
| Total | 90 | 104 |
For more information, see note 13 Contingent liabilities.
Intangible assets
| Intangible | |
|---|---|
| EUR million | assets total |
| Cost 1 January 2014 | 49 |
| Additions | 9 |
| Disposals | 0 |
| Cost 31 December 2014 | 58 |
| Accumulated depreciation 1 January 2014 | 34 |
| Disposals | 0 |
| Depreciation for the period | 6 |
| Accumulated depreciation 31 December 2014 | 40 |
| Carrying amount 31 December 2014 | 18 |
| Carrying amount 31 December 2013 | 15 |
| EUR million | Buildings and structures |
Machinery and equipment |
Advances paid and construction in progress |
Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cost 1 January 2014 | 1 | 32 | 10 | 43 |
| Additions and transfers between categories | 0 | 2 | -9 | -7 |
| Disposals | -1 | -1 | ||
| Cost 31 December 2014 | 1 | 33 | 1 | 35 |
| Accumulated depreciation 1 January 2014 | 1 | 29 | - | 30 |
| Disposals | -1 | -1 | ||
| Depreciation for the period | 2 | 2 | ||
| Accumulated depreciation 31 December 2014 | 1 | 30 | - | 31 |
| Carrying amount 31 December 2014 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 4 |
| Carrying amount 31 December 2013 | 0 | 3 | 10 | 13 |
| EUR million | Shares in Group companies |
Participation in associated companies |
Receivables from Group companies |
Receivables from associated companies |
Other non-current assets |
Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 January 2014 | 17,139 | 0 | 2,382 | 1 | 7 | 19,529 |
| Reclassifications | -6 | 6 | -378 | 381 | -3 | 0 |
| Additions 1) | 0 | 0 | 220 | 28 | 1 | 249 |
| Disposals 2) | -152 | 0 | -856 | -199 | 0 | -1,207 |
| 31 December 2014 | 16,981 | 6 | 1,368 | 211 | 5 | 18,571 |
| Accumulated write-downs 1 January 2014 3) | -924 | 0 | 0 | 0 | -2 | -926 |
| Impairment charges | -1 | -1 | ||||
| Accumulated write-downs 31 December 2014 | -924 | 0 | 0 | 0 | -3 | -927 |
| Carrying amount 31 December 2014 4) | 16,057 | 6 | 1,368 | 211 | 2 | 17,644 |
1) Additions regarding shares comprise acquisitions of shares and capital contributions and reclassification between other non-current assets and shares in Group companies.
2) Disposals regarding shares comprise divestments and repayments of capital.
3) Write-downs of participations in group companies are related to shares in Fortum Heat and Gas Oy due to received dividend payments.
4) Receivables from associated companies are mainly from AB Fortum Värme samägt med Stockholm Stad, EUR 199 million .
| EUR million | 2014 | 2013 |
|---|---|---|
| Other current receivables from group companies | ||
| Trade receivables | 13 | 10 |
| Other receivables | 564 | 609 |
| Accrued income and prepaid expenses | 9 | 11 |
| Total | 586 | 630 |
| Other current receivables from associated companies | ||
| Trade receivables | 1 | 0 |
| Accrued income and prepaid expenses | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 1 | 0 |
| Other current receivables | ||
| Trade receivables | 1 | 0 |
| Other receivables | 2 | 1 |
| Accrued income and prepaid expenses | 167 | 10 |
| Total | 170 | 11 |
| EUR million | 2014 | 2013 |
|---|---|---|
| Cash at bank and in hand | 1,813 | 1,059 |
| Bank deposits with maturity more than 3 months | 505 | 0 |
| Liquid funds | 2,318 | 1,059 |
| EUR million | Share capital |
Share premium |
Retained earnings |
Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total equity 31 December 2013 | 3,046 | 2,822 | 4,151 | 10,019 |
| Cash dividend | -977 | -977 | ||
| Profit for the period | 2,265 | 2,265 | ||
| Total equity 31 December 2014 | 3,046 | 2,822 | 5,439 | 11,307 |
| Total equity 31 December 2012 | 3,046 | 2,822 | 4,562 | 10,430 |
| Cash dividend | -888 | -888 | ||
| Profit for the period | 477 | 477 | ||
| Total equity 31 December 2013 | 3,046 | 2,822 | 4,151 | 10,019 |
| EUR million | 2014 | 2013 | ||
| Distributable funds 31 December | 5,439 | 4,151 |
| EUR million | 2014 | 2013 |
|---|---|---|
| Bonds | 3,974 | 4,725 |
| Loans from financial institutions | 514 | 681 |
| Other long-term interest-bearing debt | 781 | 945 |
| Total long-term interest-bearing debt | 5,269 | 6,351 |
| Current portion of long-term bonds | 660 | 1,103 |
| Current portion of loans from financial institutions | 137 | 49 |
| Commercial papers | 0 | 718 |
| Other short-term interest-bearing debt | 286 | 155 |
| Total short-term interest-bearing debt | 1,083 | 2,025 |
| Total external interest-bearing debt | 6,352 | 8,376 |
| EUR million | 2014 |
|---|---|
| 2015 | 1,083 |
| 2016 | 835 |
| 2017 | 511 |
| 2018 | 594 |
| 2019 | 809 |
| 2020 and later | 2,520 |
| Total | 6,352 |
| EUR million | 2014 | 2013 |
|---|---|---|
| Bonds | 1,690 | 2,440 |
| Loans from financial institutions | 49 | 118 |
| Other long-term liabilities | 781 | 750 |
| Total | 2,520 | 3,308 |
| EUR million | 2014 | 2013 |
|---|---|---|
| Interest-bearing liabilities to group companies | 9 | 9 |
| Interest-bearing liabilities to associated companies | 261 | 248 |
| Total | 270 | 257 |
| EUR million | 2014 | 2013 |
|---|---|---|
| Trade and other payables to group companies | ||
| Trade payables | 1 | 1 |
| Other liabilities | 30 | 24 |
| Accruals and deferred income | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 31 | 25 |
| Trade and other payables to associated companies | ||
| Accruals and deferred income | 3 | 2 |
| Total | 3 | 2 |
| Trade and other payables | ||
| Trade payables | 8 | 9 |
| Other liabilities | 6 | 8 |
| Accruals and deferred income | 124 | 177 |
| Total | 138 | 194 |
| EUR million | 2014 | 2013 |
|---|---|---|
| On own behalf | ||
| Other contingent liabilities | 2 | 3 |
| On behalf of group companies | ||
| Guarantees | 131 | 348 |
| On behalf of associated companies | ||
| Guarantees | 418 | 417 |
| Contingent liabilities total | 551 | 768 |
| EUR million | 2014 | 2013 |
|---|---|---|
| Lease payments | ||
| Not later than 1 year | 4 | 4 |
| Later than 1 year and not later than 5 years | 5 | 6 |
| Total | 9 | 10 |
| 2014 | 2013 | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EUR million | Contract or notional value |
Fair value | Not recog nised as income |
Contract or notional value |
Fair value | Not recog nised as income |
|
| Forward rate agreements | 0 | 56 | |||||
| Interest rate swaps | 5,721 | 155 | 160 | 6,658 | 105 | 100 | |
| Forward foreign exchange contracts 1) | 14,866 | -77 | -1 | 18,614 | -39 | 5 | |
| Interest rate and currency swaps | 1,473 | 233 | 28 | 928 | 36 | -2 |
1) Includes also future positions.
Fortum Oyj received in December 2013 an income tax assessment regarding transfer pricing for the year 2007. Fortum appealed the decision. In August 2014 The Board of Adjustment of the large Taxpayers' office approved Fortum's appeal. The Tax Recipients' Legal Services Unit within the tax authorities has appealed this decision to the Administrative Court. If the appeal of the Tax Recipients' Legal Services Unit is successful, the impact on net profit would be approximately EUR 136 million for the year 2007. Based on legal analyses, no provision has been recognized in the financial statements.
See Note 40 Related party transactions in the Consolidated financial statements.
The distributable funds of Fortum Oyj as at 31 December 2014 amounted to EUR 5,438,689,036.90 including the profit of the period of EUR 2,264,863,648.81. After the end of the financial period there have been no material changes in the financial position of the Company.
The Board of Directors proposes to the Annual General Meeting that a dividend of EUR 1.10 per share be paid for 2014. In addition the Board of Directors proposes to the Annual General Meeting an extra dividend of EUR 0.20 per share be paid for 2014.
Espoo, 3 February 2015
Based on the number of registered shares as of 3 February 2015 the total amount of dividend proposed to be paid is EUR 1,154,877,158.50. The Board of Directors proposes, that the remaining part of the profit be retained in the shareholders' equity.
We have audited the accounting records, the financial statements, the Operating and Financial Review, and the administration of Fortum Oyj for the financial period 1.1.-31.12.2014. The financial statements comprise of the consolidated income statement, statement of comprehensive income, balance sheet, statement of changes in equity, cash flow statement and notes to
the consolidated financial statements, as well as the parent company's income statement, balance sheet, cash flow statement and notes to the financial statements.
The Board of Directors and the President and CEO are responsible for the preparation of consolidated financial statements that give a
true and fair view in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) as adopted by the EU, as well as for the preparation of financial statements and the Operating and Financial Review that give a true and fair view in accordance with the laws and regulations governing the preparation of the financial statements and the Operating and Financial Review in Finland. The Board of Directors is responsible for the appropriate arrangement of the
control of the company's accounts and finances, and the President and CEO shall see to it that the accounts of the company are in compliance with the law and that its financial affairs have been arranged in a reliable manner.
Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the financial statements, on the consolidated financial statements and on the Operating and Financial Review based on our audit. The Auditing Act requires that we comply with the requirements of professional ethics. We conducted our audit in accordance with good auditing practice in Finland. Good auditing practice requires that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements and the Operating and Financial Review are free from material misstatement, and whether the members of the Board of Directors of the parent company and the President and CEO are guilty of an act or negligence which may result in liability in damages towards the company or have violated the Limited Liability Companies Act or the articles of association of the company.
An audit involves performing procedures to obtain audit evidence about the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements and the Operating and Financial Review. The procedures selected depend on the auditor's judgment, including the assessment of the risks of material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error. In making those risk assessments, the auditor considers internal
control relevant to the entity's preparation of financial statements and Operating and Financial Review that give a true and fair view in order to design audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the company's internal control. An audit also includes evaluating the appropriateness of accounting policies used and the reasonableness of accounting estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements and Operating and Financial Review.
We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our audit opinion.
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements give a true and fair view of the financial position, financial performance, and cash flows of the group in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) as adopted by the EU.
In our opinion, the financial statements and the Operating and Financial Review give a true and fair view of both the consolidated and the parent company's financial performance and financial position in accordance with the laws and regulations
governing the preparation of the financial statements and the Operating and Financial Review in Finland. The information in the Operating and Financial Review is consistent with the information in the financial statements.
We support that the financial statements should be adopted. The proposal by the Board of Directors regarding the treatment of distributable funds is in compliance with the Limited Liability Companies Act. We support that the Board of Directors of the parent company and the President and CEO should be discharged from liability for the financial period audited by us.
Espoo, 3 February 2015
Deloitte & Touche Oy Authorized Public Audit Firm
Jukka Vattulainen Authorized Public Accountant
Note: Quarterly financial information is unaudited.
| Q1/ | Q2/ | Q3/ | Q4/ | Q1/ | Q2/ | Q3/ | Q4/ | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EUR million | 2013 | 2013 | 2013 | 2013 | 2013 | 2014 | 2014 | 2014 | 2014 | 2014 |
| Sales | 1,654 | 1,205 | 1,060 | 1,390 | 5,309 | 1,473 | 1,016 | 976 | 1,285 | 4,751 |
| Comparable EBITDA | 664 | 429 | 336 | 547 | 1,975 | 627 | 382 | 309 | 556 | 1,873 |
| Comparable operating profit | 524 | 289 | 167 | 423 | 1,403 | 477 | 255 | 183 | 436 | 1,351 |
| Operating profit | 477 | 429 | 96 | 507 | 1,508 | 2,333 | 295 | 149 | 650 | 3,428 |
| Share of profit/loss of associates | ||||||||||
| and joint ventures | 78 | 34 | 3 | 63 | 178 | 72 | 37 | 1 | 38 | 149 |
| Finance costs - net | -65 | -75 | -72 | -77 | -289 | -64 | -48 | -56 | -48 | -217 |
| Profit before income tax | 490 | 388 | 27 | 493 | 1,398 | 2,341 | 284 | 95 | 639 | 3,360 |
| Income tax expense | -86 | -74 | 3 | -29 | -186 | -86 | -37 | -11 | -64 | -199 |
| Profit for the period | 404 | 314 | 30 | 465 | 1,212 | 2,255 | 247 | 84 | 575 | 3,161 |
| Profit for the period, non-controlling interests | -3 | 0 | 1 | -6 | -8 | -4 | 0 | 1 | -4 | -7 |
| Profit for the period, owners of the parent | 401 | 314 | 31 | 458 | 1,204 | 2,251 | 247 | 85 | 571 | 3,154 |
| Earnings per share, basic, EUR | 0.45 | 0.35 | 0.04 | 0.52 | 1.36 | 2.53 | 0.28 | 0.10 | 0.64 | 3.55 |
| Earnings per share, diluted, EUR | 0.45 | 0.35 | 0.04 | 0.52 | 1.36 | 2.53 | 0.28 | 0.10 | 0.64 | 3.55 |
Sales by quarter, EUR million Comparable operating profit
by quarter, EUR million
| EUR million | Q1/ 2013 |
Q2/ 2013 |
Q3/ 2013 |
Q4/ 2013 |
2013 | Q1/ 2014 |
Q2/ 2014 |
Q3/ 2014 |
Q4/ 2014 |
2014 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power and Technology | 665 | 548 | 496 | 543 | 2,252 | 586 | 487 | 495 | 588 | 2,156 |
| Heat, Electricity Sales and Solutions | 531 | 308 | 255 | 422 | 1,516 | 446 | 269 | 224 | 393 | 1,332 |
| Russia | 344 | 251 | 210 | 314 | 1,119 | 333 | 234 | 207 | 281 | 1,055 |
| Distribution | 339 | 227 | 217 | 280 | 1,064 | 300 | 148 | 130 | 173 | 751 |
| Other | 15 | 14 | 14 | 20 | 63 | 14 | 14 | 14 | 15 | 58 |
| Netting of Nord Pool transactions 1) | -171 | -95 | -90 | -122 | -478 | -133 | -101 | -67 | -121 | -422 |
| Eliminations | -70 | -49 | -42 | -67 | -228 | -72 | -35 | -26 | -45 | -179 |
| Total | 1,654 | 1,205 | 1,060 | 1,390 | 5,309 | 1,473 | 1,016 | 976 | 1,285 | 4,751 |
1) Sales and purchases with Nord Pool Spot are netted at the Group level on an hourly basis and posted either as revenue or cost depending on if Fortum is a net seller or net buyer during any particular hour.
| EUR million | Q1/ 2013 |
Q2/ 2013 |
Q3/ 2013 |
Q4/ 2013 |
2013 | Q1/ 2014 |
Q2/ 2014 |
Q3/ 2014 |
Q4/ 2014 |
2014 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power and Technology | 303 | 210 | 139 | 207 | 859 | 251 | 183 | 167 | 276 | 877 |
| Heat, Electricity Sales and Solutions | 57 | 13 | -3 | 42 | 109 | 48 | 11 | -4 | 49 | 104 |
| Russia | 41 | 20 | -15 | 110 | 156 | 73 | 28 | 1 | 59 | 161 |
| Distribution | 137 | 60 | 59 | 76 | 332 | 119 | 45 | 36 | 67 | 266 |
| Other | -14 | -14 | -14 | -12 | -54 | -14 | -13 | -16 | -14 | -57 |
| Comparable operating profit | 524 | 289 | 167 | 423 | 1,403 | 477 | 255 | 183 | 436 | 1,351 |
| Non-recurring items | 4 | 0 | 39 | 17 | 61 | 1,851 | 73 | 8 | 238 | 2,171 |
| Other items affecting comparability | -51 | 140 | -110 | 66 | 45 | 5 | -32 | -42 | -24 | -94 |
| Operating profit | 477 | 429 | 96 | 507 | 1,508 | 2,333 | 295 | 149 | 650 | 3,428 |
The first and last quarters of the year are usually the strongest quarters for power and heat businesses.
The Annual General Meeting of Fortum Corporation will be held on Tuesday, 31 March 2015, starting at 14:00 EET at Finlandia Hall, address: Mannerheimintie 13 e, Helsinki, Finland. The reception of shareholders who have registered for the meeting will commence at 13.00 EET.
The Board of Directors proposes to the Annual General Meeting that Fortum Corporation pays a dividend of EUR 1.10 per share and an extra dividend of EUR 0.20 per share for 2014, totaling approximately EUR 1,155 million based on the registered shares as of 3 February 2015.The possible dividendrelated dates planned for 2015 are:
Fortum will publish three interim reports in 2015: Q1 on 29 April, Q2 on 17 July, and Q3 on 22 October.
The reports are published at approximately 9:00 EET in Finnish and English, and are available on Fortum's website at www.fortum.com/investors
Fortum's management hosts regular press conferences, targeted at analysts and the
Fortums Investor Relations (IR) activities cover equity and fixed-income markets to ensure full and fair valuation of the Companys shares, access to funding sources and stable bond pricing. Investors and analysts primarily in Europe and North America are met on a regular basis.
In 2014 Fortum met approximately 250 professional equity investros individually or in group meetings, whilst maintaining regular contact with equity research analysts at investment banks and brokerage firms. During the year, IR and senior management gave approximately 20 presentations at investor confereces in Scandinavia and the United Kingdom.
media. A webcast of these conferences is available online at www.fortum.com. Management also gives interviews on a oneon-one and group basis. Fortum observes a silent period of 30 days prior to publishing its results.
Listed on Nasdaq Helsinki Trading ticker: FUM1V Number of shares, 4 February 2015: 888,367,045. Sector: Utilities
The use of the website of Fortum Corporation and its subsidiaries (together "FORTUM") requires following the terms of use set forth below. You are not allowed to use FORTUM´S website if you do not agree to follow these terms of use.
The entire content of FORTUM'S website, such as text, graphics, names, images, figures, drawings, logos icons, recordings and software, are property of FORTUM and its associated companies, licensors and partners. Any rights not expressly granted herein are reserved. Copying, transferring, modifying, saving, publishing and distributing the content of FORTUM'S website or part thereof is prohibited without FORTUM'S prior written consent.
The use of FORTUM'S website for personal, non-commercial purposes is permitted. Documents classified as public, such as press releases, may be used for public communications if the source of the information is displayed.
FORTUM'S website and its content are provided on "as is" basis. FORTUM does not give any express or implied representation or warranty with respect to the information included in FORTUM'S website, including any representation or warranty as to the accuracy, completeness or reliability of the information. Nothing included in FORTUM'S website can be held as a binding offer or commitment of FORTUM. FORTUM reserves the right to modify these terms of use and FORTUM'S website and its content or part thereof at any time without prior notice. FORTUM does not make any representation or warranty as to the accessibility of FORTUM'S website.
FORTUM SHALL IN NO EVENT BE LIABLE FOR ANY LOSS OR DAMAGE OF WHATSOEVER NATURE INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, INDIRECT AND CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGE, SUCH AS LOSS OF REVENUE, LOSS OF INCOME, LOSS OF PROFIT, BUSINESS INTERRUPTION OR LOSS OF DATA, ARISING FROM THE USE OF THIS WEBSITE OR ITS CONTENT OR THE INTERRUPTION OR LOSS OF DATA, ARISING FROM THE USE OF THIS WEBSITE OR ITS CONTENT OR THE INTERRUPTION OR INAVAILABILITY OF THE SAME. NEITHER SHALL FORTUM BE LIABLE FOR ANY LOSS OR DAMAGE CAUSED DUE TO ERRORS, INTERRUPTIONS OR INAVAILABILITY OF DATA SYSTEMS OR DATA COMMUNICATIONS OR DAMAGE CAUSED DUE TO MALWARE OF VIRUSES. IF THE APPLICABLE JURISDICTION DOES NOT ALLOW THE ABOVE LIMITATION OF LIABILITY, THE LIABILITY OF FORTUM SHALL BE LIMITED TO THE GREATEST EXTENT PERMITTED BY THE APPLICABLE LAW.
The sections 'This is Fortum', 'Business', 'In society' and 'GRI' have not been audited. The sustainability reporting material presented on these sections have been provided a limited independent assurance by a third party according to the scope and standards disclosed in the Assurance Statement, which will be publish at the end of March. References to the future presented on these pages reflect Fortum's assessments at the beginning of February 2015. Materialisation of such assessments is dependent on various factors, some of which Fortum may not have an impact on, and thus the final outcome may deviate from the assessments presented. Fortum discloses its outlook statement and the risks related to the realisation of the outlook statement separately in accordance with the applicable laws and regulations under the specific sections in the Operating and Financial Review. Fortum Corporation's Financial Statements and Operating and Financial Review for 2014 and the related Auditor's Report are available on this website.
The user of FORTUM'S website is solely responsible for the accuracy and delivery of information and materials submitted to FORTUM'S website and that the user is entitled to provide FORTUM with such information or materials. The user of FORTUM'S website shall take all reasonable measures to make sure that information and materials submitted to FORTUM do not contain malware or viruses. FORTUM shall be granted with a royalty-free and unlimited right to modify, copy, publish and distribute all information and materials submitted to FORTUM'S website, either as such or as part of other materials or documentation, for any and all commercial and non-commercial use to the extent permitted by the laws of Finland.
The privacy of customers' personal information is important to FORTUM. FORTUM complies with the applicable legislation on personal data protection. User may request to have User's personal information collected by FORTUM removed or corrected at any time.
These terms of use shall be governed by the laws of Finland.
Please address all enquiries and remarks regarding these terms of use to FORTUM'S Legal Affairs, P.O. BOX 1, 00048 FORTUM, FINLAND, Tel. +358 10 4511
Building tools?
Free accounts include 100 API calls/year for testing.
Have a question? We'll get back to you promptly.