Quarterly Report • Oct 25, 2016
Quarterly Report
Open in ViewerOpens in native device viewer
25 October 2016
Fortum Corporation Domicile Espoo Business ID 1463611-4
| Low hydro production volumes affected seasonally weak quarter | 3 |
|---|---|
| Fortum's President and CEO Pekka Lundmark comments | 4 |
| Fortum's new vision, strategic cornerstones and updated financial targets | 5 |
| Reorganisation of operations | 5 |
| Financial results | 6 |
| Financial position and cash flow | 8 |
| Market conditions | 9 |
| Segment reviews | 11 |
| Capital expenditures, divestments and investments in shares | 16 |
| Shares and share capital | 18 |
| Group personnel | 19 |
| Research and development | 19 |
| Sustainability | 19 |
| Changes in Fortum's Management | 21 |
| Annual General Meeting 2016 | 22 |
| Outlook | 23 |
| Dividend payment | 27 |
| Condensed consolidated income statement | 29 |
|---|---|
| Condensed consolidated balance sheet | 31 |
| Condensed consolidated statement of changes in total equity | 32 |
| Condensed consolidated cash flow statement | 33 |
| Change in net debt and key ratios | 35 |
| Notes to the condensed consolidated interim financial statements | 37 |
| Definition of key figures | 56 |
| Market conditions and achieved power prices | 58 |
| Fortum's production and sales volumes | 59 |
Fortum implemented ESMA's (European Securities and Markets Authority) new guidelines regarding Alternative Performance Measures ("APM") in the first quarter of 2016. Fortum has defined and presented its APM in a consistent and comprehensive manner since 2005 and therefore the implementation had only a limited effect on the disclosures. For more information, see the first quarter 2016 interim report.
Financial results discussed in this interim report are for the continuing operations of Fortum Group. The Distribution segment was classified as discontinued operations in 2015 upon the divestment of the Swedish distribution operations.
Figures in brackets refer to the comparison period, i.e. the same period last year, unless otherwise stated.
| Key financial ratios* | 2015 | LTM |
|---|---|---|
| Return on capital employed, % | 22.7 | 3.2 |
| Comparable net debt/EBITDA | -1.7 | -0.1 |
* Key financial ratios for 2015 are based on total Fortum, including discontinued operations
| Key figures | III/16 | III/15 | I-III/16 | I-III/15 | 2015 | LTM |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sales, EUR million | 732 | 661 | 2,489 | 2,495 | 3,459 | 3,453 |
| Comparable EBITDA, EUR million | ||||||
| continuing operations | 151 | 163 | 717 | 787 | 1,102 | 1,033 |
| discontinued operations | - | - | - | 163 | 163 | - |
| total Fortum | 151 | 163 | 717 | 950 | 1,265 | 1,033 |
| Comparable operating profit, EUR million | ||||||
| continuing operations | 58 | 79 | 455 | 565 | 808 | 698 |
| discontinued operations | - | - | - | 114 | 114 | - |
| total Fortum | 58 | 79 | 455 | 678 | 922 | 698 |
| Operating profit, EUR million | ||||||
| continuing operations | -6 | -682 | 430 | -188 | -150 | 468 |
| discontinued operations | - | - | - | 4,395 | 4,395 | - |
| total Fortum | -6 | -682 | 430 | 4,207 | 4,245 | 468 |
| Share of profits of associates and joint ventures, EUR million |
||||||
| continuing operations | 11 | -95 | 116 | -15 | 20 | 151 |
| discontinued operations | - | - | - | 0 | 0 | - |
| total Fortum | 11 | -95 | 116 | -15 | 20 | 151 |
| Profit before taxes, EUR million | ||||||
| continuing operations | -40 | -818 | 411 | -325 | -305 | 431 |
| discontinued operations | - | - | - | 4,393 | 4,393 | - |
| total Fortum | -40 | -818 | 411 | 4,068 | 4,088 | 431 |
| Earnings per share, EUR | ||||||
| continuing operations | -0.03 | -0.74 | 0.40 | -0.28 | -0.26 | 0.41 |
| discontinued operations | - | - | - | 4.92 | 4.92 | - |
| total Fortum | -0.03 | -0.74 | 0.40 | 4.64 | 4.66 | 0.41 |
| Net cash from operating activities, EUR million, continuing operations |
101 | 151 | 471 | 896 | 1,228 | 803 |
| Shareholders' equity per share, EUR | 14.75 | 15.54 | 15.53 | |||
| Interest-bearing net debt (at end of period), EUR million |
-137 | -1,936 | -2,195 |
"The third quarter is always challenging due to the seasonality of our business. This year was no exception. Fortum's results continued to decline mainly due to significantly lower hydro production volumes. The decline was partially offset by strong performance in the Russia segment, a clearly higher achieved power price and higher nuclear volumes compared to the third quarter of 2015.
There are, however, some positive signs on the power market, mainly driven by commodity and emission prices. Forward market prices increased at the very end of the quarter and are now clearly higher than at the end of the second quarter.
Another positive development was the Swedish government's budget proposal in September; it included the timetable for lowering the real-estate tax on hydro assets and for phasing out the nuclear capacity tax over the coming years. We are very pleased with the swift decision and the finalisation of the timetable, which gives regulatory stability to operate the plants and plan the necessary safety investments. This is completely in line with what we have been advocating for; a regulation and taxation policy where the different forms of CO2-free production are treated more equally.
As the investment programme in Russia was completed during the spring, OAO Fortum's new capacity has been the key driver for the earnings growth in the Russia division.
During the quarter, Fortum finalised the acquisition of Ekokem, a leading Nordic circular economy company. The deal marks a very important step in the implementation of our strategy and gives us access to new revenue streams independent on the Nordic power price.
We have continued reducing fixed costs according to earlier announced plan and the progress has been good. Enabled by our strong net cash position, we will carry on our efforts to grow and we are constantly looking for good investment opportunities, as outlined in our strategy."
In February, Fortum launched its new vision, strategic cornerstones and updated financial targets. The new vision and strategy targets growth and continued profitability with a strong focus on clean energy, customers and shareholder value creation.
The long-term financial target for return on capital employed (ROCE) has been revised to at least 10%, while the target for comparable net debt to EBITDA, around 2.5 times, remained unchanged. The dividend policy also remained unchanged.
Fortum's strategy has four cornerstones: (1) enhance productivity of the current fleet and drive industry transformation, (2) create sustainable solutions for growing cities and urban areas, (3) increase investments in solar and wind power, and (4) build new energy ventures.
Fortum has reorganised its operating structure as of 1 April 2016. The target of the new organisation is to enable the implementation of the company's new vision and strategy. The new organisation consists of three business divisions: Generation, City Solutions and Russia. In addition, two development units focusing on growing new businesses were established: (1) M&A and Solar & Wind Development, and (2) Technology and New Ventures.
The changes to Fortum's segment reporting were minor and the company continues to have four reporting segments. The segments as of the second quarter of 2016 are: Generation (mainly the former Power and Technology); City Solutions (mainly the former Heat, Electricity Sales and Solutions); Russia; and Other, under which M&A, Solar & Wind Development, and Technology and New Ventures, as well as corporate functions are reported. Some businesses were repositioned due to the reorganisation, but because of the minor financial impact, the comparable segment information for 2015 has not been restated.
Following the divestment of the Swedish distribution business, Fortum no longer has electricity distribution operations. The Distribution segment was reclassified as discontinued operations as of the first quarter of 2015.
The financial results discussed in this interim report are for the continuing operations of Fortum Group.
| EUR million | III/16 | III/15 | I-III/16 | I-III/15 | 2015 | LTM |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Generation | 371 | 377 | 1,222 | 1,282 | 1,722 | 1,662 |
| City Solutions | 237 | 185 | 894 | 835 | 1,187 | 1,246 |
| Russia | 175 | 154 | 606 | 627 | 893 | 872 |
| Other | 29 | 28 | 91 | 86 | 114 | 119 |
| Netting of Nord Pool transactions | -66 | -57 | -255 | -240 | -336 | -351 |
| Eliminations | -15 | -26 | -69 | -95 | -122 | -96 |
| Total continuing operations | 732 | 661 | 2,489 | 2,495 | 3,459 | 3,453 |
| Discontinued operations | - | - | - | 274 | 274 | - |
| Eliminations | - | - | - | -31 | -31 | - |
| Total Fortum | 732 | 661 | 2,489 | 2,738 | 3,702 | 3,453 |
| EUR million | III/16 | III/15 | I-III/16 | I-III/15 | 2015 | LTM |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Generation | 77 | 102 | 330 | 419 | 561 | 472 |
| City Solutions | -16 | -13 | 49 | 55 | 108 | 102 |
| Russia | 12 | 0 | 125 | 132 | 201 | 194 |
| Other | -15 | -10 | -49 | -42 | -63 | -70 |
| Total continuing operations | 58 | 79 | 455 | 565 | 808 | 698 |
| Discontinued operations | - | - | - | 114 | 114 | - |
| Total Fortum | 58 | 79 | 455 | 678 | 922 | 698 |
| EUR million | III/16 | III/15 | I-III/16 | I-III/15 | 2015 | LTM |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Generation | 18 | -651 | 261 | -332 | -396 | 197 |
| City Solutions | -21 | -22 | 60 | 51 | 105 | 114 |
| Russia | 12 | 1 | 159 | 134 | 203 | 228 |
| Other | -16 | -9 | -49 | -41 | -62 | -70 |
| Total continuing operations | -6 | -682 | 430 | -188 | -150 | 468 |
| Discontinued operations | - | - | - | 4,395 | 4,395 | - |
| Total Fortum | -6 | -682 | 430 | 4,207 | 4,245 | 468 |
In the third quarter of 2016, sales increased to EUR 732 (661) million, mainly due to the consolidation of DUON and Ekokem into Fortum Group. Comparable operating profit totalled EUR 58 (79) million and reported operating profit totalled EUR -6 (-682) million. Fortum's operating profit for the period was impacted by items affecting comparability, including sales gains, Ekokem transaction costs and IFRS accounting treatment (IAS 39) of derivatives mainly used for hedging Fortum's power production, as well as nuclear fund adjustments for continuing operations, amounting to EUR -65 (-761) million (Note 4 and 6). The corresponding period of 2015, included an EUR -784 million impact from the decision on the early closure of two nuclear units in Sweden (Note 4 and 6).
The share of profit from associates was EUR 11 (-95) million, of which Hafslund represented EUR 10 (10), TGC-1 EUR 7 (6) and Fortum Värme EUR -4 (-8) million. The share of profit from Hafslund and TGC-1 are based on the companies' published second-quarter 2016 interim reports (Note 14). In the corresponding period of 2015, the decision on the early closure of two nuclear units in Sweden impacted the share of profit from associates by EUR -104 million (Note 6). In addition, for Fortum Värme the corresponding period in 2015 included the paid compensation for refinancing the interest-bearing loans from Fortum (Note 14).
In January-September 2016, sales was EUR 2,489 (2,495) million. Comparable operating profit totalled EUR 455 (565) million and reported operating profit totalled EUR 430 (-188) million. Fortum's operating profit for the period was impacted by items affecting comparability, including sales gains, Ekokem transaction costs and IFRS accounting treatment (IAS 39) of derivatives mainly used for hedging Fortum's power production, as well as nuclear fund adjustments for continuing operations, amounting to EUR -25 (-752) million (Note 4). The corresponding period of 2015, included a EUR - 784 million impact from the decision on the early closure of two nuclear units in Sweden (Note 4 and 6).
The share of profit from associates was EUR 116 (-15) million, of which Hafslund represented EUR 42 (31), TGC-1 EUR 34 (34) and Fortum Värme EUR 40 (23) million. The share of profit from Hafslund and TGC-1 are based on the companies' published fourth-quarter 2015, and first- and second-quarter 2016 interim reports (Note 14). The corresponding period in 2015 was affected by the decision on the early closure of two nuclear units in Sweden, which impacted the share of profit from associates by EUR -104 million (Note 6). In addition, for Fortum Värme the corresponding period in 2015 was lower mainly due to the paid compensation for refinancing the interest-bearing loans from Fortum.
Net financial expenses were EUR -135 (-123) million and include changes in the fair value of financial instruments of EUR 0 (-14) million. In the corresponding period of 2015, net financial expenses included EUR 38 million compensation from prepayment of loans by Fortum Värme (Note 14).
Profit before taxes was EUR 411 (-325) million. The corresponding period of 2015, was impacted by EUR -888 million due to the decision on the early closing of the two nuclear units in Sweden.
Taxes for the period totalled EUR -54 (80) million. The effective income tax rate according to the income statement was 13.1% (24.5%). The comparable effective income tax rate, excluding the impact of the share of profit from associated companies and joint ventures as well as non-taxable capital gains, was 19.0% (25.6%) (Note 10).
The profit for the period for continuing operations was EUR 357 (-246) million. Earnings per share for continuing operations were EUR 0.40 (-0.28), of which EUR -0.03 (-0.77) per share relates to items affecting comparability. In the corresponding period of 2015, the impact of the decision on the early closing of two nuclear units in Sweden was EUR -0.80 per share.
In January-September 2016, net cash from operating activities from continuing operations decreased by EUR 425 million to EUR 471 (896) million, mainly due to lower Comparable EBITDA EUR 70 million, higher income taxes paid EUR 136 million, and lower realised foreign exchange gains and losses EUR 137 million. In June, Fortum paid income taxes in Sweden totalling EUR 127 million regarding tax disputes. The appeal process is ongoing and based on legal opinions no provision is made, and the payment is booked as a receivable (Note 22). Realised foreign exchange gains and losses of EUR 112 million relate to the rollover of foreign exchange contract hedging loans to Fortum's Swedish and Russian subsidiaries.
Capital expenditures increased by EUR 20 million to EUR 367 (347) million. Net cash used in investing activities increased to EUR 1,439 (0) million, mainly due to the acquisition of shares of EUR 667 (6) million. Acquisition of shares relates mainly to acquisition of Ekokem and DUON. Increase in other interest-bearing receivables, EUR 376 million, relates mainly to bank deposits, given as trading collaterals to commodity exchanges. In 2015, the change of shareholder loans to associated companies and joint venture, EUR 301 million, includes repayments by Fortum Värme amounting to EUR 376 million.
Cash flow before financing activities is EUR -968 (6,303) million. In 2015, the impact from discontinued operations was EUR 6,457 million.
Fortum paid dividends totalling EUR 977 (1,155) million in April 2016. Payments of long-term and short-term liabilities totalled EUR 962 (919) million including repayment of a EUR 750 million bond and Ekokem loans of EUR 115 million. The total net decrease in liquid funds was EUR 2,887 million (increase 5,318).
Total assets decreased by EUR 1,429 million to EUR 21,338 (22,767 at year-end 2015) million.
Liquid funds at the end of September 2016 were EUR 5,322 (8,202 at year-end 2015) million.
Capital employed was EUR 18,362 (19,870 at year-end 2015) million, a decrease of EUR 1,508 million.
Equity attributable to owners of the parent company totalled EUR 13,100 (13,794 at year-end 2015) million.
The decrease in equity attributable to owners of the parent company totalled EUR 694 million and was mainly from dividends paid EUR 977 million and the net profit for the period EUR 352 million.
Fortum was net cash positive at the end of the period. Net cash decreased by EUR 2,058 million to EUR 137 (2,195 at year-end 2015) million.
At the end of September, the Group's liquid funds totalled EUR 5,322 (8,202 at year-end 2015) million. Liquid funds include cash and bank deposits held by OAO Fortum amounting to EUR 110 (76 at year-end 2015) million. In addition to liquid funds, Fortum had access to approximately EUR 2.0 billion of undrawn committed credit facilities (Note 16).
Net financial expenses in January-September were EUR -135 (-123) million, of which net interest expenses were EUR -132 (-156) million. Net financial expenses include changes in the fair value of financial instruments of EUR 0 (-14) million and EUR 38 million compensation from prepayment of loans by Fortum Värme for January-September 2015 .
In June 2016, Fortum signed a EUR 1,750 million syndicated Multicurrency Revolving Facility Agreement. The committed facility will be used for general corporate purposes and replaces the existing credit facility signed in July 2011. The facility has an initial maturity of five years and Fortum may request two one-year extension options.
Fortum's long-term credit ratings were unchanged. Standard & Poor's rating is BBB+ and the shortterm rating A-2. The outlook is stable. Fitch Ratings long-term Issuer Default Rating (IDR) and senior unsecured rating is BBB+ and the short-term IDR is F2 with a stable outlook.
For the last twelve months comparable net debt to EBITDA was -0.1 (-1.7 at year-end 2015).
Gearing was -1% (-16% at year-end 2015) and the equity-to-assets ratio 62% (61% at year-end 2015). Equity per share was EUR 14.75 (15.53 at year-end 2015). For the last twelve months return on capital employed totalled 3.2% (22.7% at year-end 2015).
According to preliminary statistics, electricity consumption in the Nordic countries was 80 (81) terawatt-hours (TWh) during the third quarter of 2016. In January-September 2016, electricity consumption increased by 5 TWh to 283 (278) TWh, mainly due to colder weather during the winter.
At the beginning of 2016, the Nordic water reservoirs were at 98 TWh, which is 15 TWh above the long-term average and 18 TWh higher than a year earlier. By the end of the third quarter 2016, reservoirs were 3 TWh below the long-term average and 12 TWh lower than at the end of September 2015. Reservoir levels have decreased due to below-normal precipitation during 2016.
In the third quarter of 2016, the average system spot price was EUR 25.2 (13.3) per MWh. The average area price in Finland was EUR 31.6 (30.1) per MWh and in Sweden SE3 (Stockholm) EUR 29.6 (15.5) per MWh. The system spot price increased compared to the exceptionally low level in the third quarter of 2015, which was caused by high inflows and late snow melt.
During January-September 2016, the average system spot price was EUR 24.4 (20.7) per MWh, with the area price in Finland at EUR 30.8 (29.3) per MWh and in Sweden SE3 (Stockholm) at EUR 26.7 (21.7) per MWh.
In Germany, the average spot price during the third quarter of 2016 was EUR 28.3 (32.8) per MWh, and during January-September 2016 EUR 26.1 (31.1) per MWh.
The market price of CO2 emission allowances (EUA) was EUR 8.1 per tonne at the beginning of the year. During the third quarter the price fluctuated between EUR 4 and 5 per tonne and ended at EUR 4.9 per tonne at the end of September 2016.
Fortum operates both in the Tyumen and Khanty-Mansiysk area of Western Siberia, where industrial production is dominated by the oil and gas industries, and in the Chelyabinsk area of the Urals, which is dominated by the metal industry.
According to preliminary statistics, Russian electricity consumption was 231 (225) TWh during the third quarter of 2016. The corresponding figure in Fortum's operating area in the First price zone (European and Urals part of Russia) was 179 (174) TWh. In January-September 2016, Russian electricity consumption was 740 (731) TWh and the corresponding figure in Fortum's operating area in the First price zone was 567 (561) TWh.
In the third quarter of 2016, the average electricity spot price, excluding capacity price, increased by approximately 10% to RUB (Russian rouble) 1,298 (1,184) per MWh in the First price zone. In January-September 2016, the average electricity spot price, excluding capacity price, increased by approximately 5% to RUB 1,204 (1,146) per MWh in the First price zone.
More detailed information about the market fundamentals is included in the tables at the end of the report (page 58).
In June, a broad parliamentary agreement covering long-term energy policies was presented by the government and parts of the opposition. One of the key elements of the agreement was tax reductions for the energy sector. In September, the Swedish government presented a budget proposal for the coming years, including a timetable for the tax reductions. The proposal is subject to the formal decision by the Parliament in spring 2017.
The ratification of the global climate agreement adopted in Paris in December 2015 has proceeded more quickly than anticipated and the Agreement will enter into force already on 4 November 2016. The European Union finalised its ratification on 5 October 2016. Currently, 77 parties representing over 60% of global emissions have submitted their ratification.
In July, the European Commission released proposals aiming to accelerate Europe's transition to a low-carbon economy. The key elements of the package include binding greenhouse gas reduction targets for member states in the non-ETS sectors (e.g. transport, buildings, agriculture and waste management) in 2021-2030, inclusion of land use and forestry emissions in the 2030 legislative framework, and a European strategy for low emission mobility. The latter relies heavily on electrification of the transport sector while recognising the role of biofuels too. The summer package, together with the 2015 proposal for the amendment of the emissions trading directive, will implement the EU target of a 40% emission reduction by 2030.
The Finnish budget proposal for 2017 included key energy-related decisions on the increase of fuel taxes, the so-called CHP tax compromise, and the decision to assess how to bring wind power into the scope of the real-estate taxation applicable to power plants. Currently, wind power is subject to a lower tax rate. New tax treatment would be applicable from 2018 onwards. Also, the earlier announced mechanism to offset the indirect costs of the EU Emissions Trading System for energyintensive industries was approved as part of the budget proposals. The Parliament is set to adopt the related budget laws during autumn 2016.
Generation is responsible for Nordic power production. The segment comprises nuclear, hydro and thermal power production, portfolio management, and trading and industrial intelligence as well as nuclear services globally.
| EUR million | III/16 | III/15 | I-III/16 | I-III/15 | 2015 | LTM |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sales | 371 | 377 | 1,222 | 1,282 | 1,722 | 1,662 |
| - power sales | 367 | 343 | 1,206 | 1,206 | 1,625 | 1,625 |
| of which Nordic power sales* | 303 | 326 | 1,022 | 1,135 | 1,526 | 1,413 |
| - other sales | 5 | 34 | 16 | 75 | 97 | 38 |
| Comparable EBITDA | 104 | 131 | 410 | 506 | 680 | 584 |
| Comparable operating profit | 77 | 102 | 330 | 419 | 561 | 472 |
| Operating profit | 18 | -651 | 261 | -332 | -396 | 197 |
| Share of profits from associates and joint ventures** |
-4 | -106 | -9 | -115 | -111 | -5 |
| Comparable net assets (at period end) |
5,685 | 5,856 | 5,931 | |||
| Comparable return on net assets, % | 9.5 | 8.4 | ||||
| Capital expenditure and gross investments in shares |
47 | 52 | 124 | 122 | 203 | 205 |
| Number of employees | 1,024 | 1,358 | 1,341 |
* The Nordic power sales income and volume includes hydro and nuclear generation, excluding minorities. It does not include thermal generation, minorities, customer business or other purchases
** Power plants are often built jointly with other power producers, and owners purchase electricity at cost including interest cost and production taxes. The share of profit/loss is mainly IFRS adjustments (e.g. accounting for nuclear-related assets and liabilities) and depreciations on fair value adjustments from historical acquisitions (Note 20 in the Consolidated financial statements 2015)
| Power generation by source, TWh | III/16 | III/15 | I-III/16 | I-III/15 | 2015 | LTM |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hydro power, Nordic | 4.3 | 6.6 | 16.5 | 19.2 | 25.1 | 22.4 |
| Nuclear power, Nordic | 5.6 | 5.1 | 17.8 | 16.8 | 22.7 | 23.7 |
| Thermal power, Nordic | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.3 | 0.3 |
| Total | 10.0 | 11.8 | 34.5 | 36.2 | 48.1 | 46.4 |
| Nordic sales volumes, TWh | III/16 | III/15 | I-III/16 | I-III/15 | 2015 | LTM |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nordic sales volume | 11.4 | 12.2 | 39.4 | 37.9 | 50.5 | 52.0 |
| of which Nordic power sales volume* | 9.6 | 11.4 | 33.1 | 34.8 | 46.3 | 44.6 |
* The Nordic power sales income and volume includes hydro and nuclear generation, excluding minorities. It does not include thermal generation, minorities, customer business or other purchases
| Sales price, EUR/MWh | III/16 | III/15 | I-III/16 | I-III/15 | 2015 | LTM |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Generation's Nordic power price* | 31.6 | 28.7 | 30.9 | 32.6 | 33.0 | 31.7 |
* Generation's Nordic power price includes hydro and nuclear generation, excluding minorities. It does not include thermal generation, minorities, customer business or other purchases
In the third quarter of 2016, the Generation segment's comparable operating profit was 77 (102) million, EUR 25 million lower than in the corresponding period in 2015. The decline, mainly due to lower hydro volumes, was partly offset by a higher achieved power price, good nuclear availability and a somewhat lower cost base compared to the corresponding period in 2015.
Operating profit of EUR 18 (-651) million was affected by the IFRS accounting treatment (IAS 39) of derivatives, mainly used for hedging Fortum's power production, and by nuclear fund adjustments, amounting to EUR -59 (-753) million (Note 4). The corresponding period in 2015 included EUR -784 million from the decision on the early closure of two nuclear units in Sweden (Note 6).
The share of profits from associated companies and joint ventures totalled EUR -4 (-106) million (Note 14).
Generation's achieved Nordic power price was EUR 31.6 (28.7) per MWh, EUR 2.9 per MWh higher than in the corresponding period in 2015. The system price and all area prices were higher in the third quarter of 2016 compared to the same period in 2015. The average system spot price of electricity in Nord Pool was EUR 25.2 (13.3) per MWh. The average area price in Finland was EUR 31.6 (30.1) per MWh and in Sweden SE3 (Stockholm) EUR 29.6 (15.5) per MWh.
The segment's total power generation in the Nordic countries was 10.0 (11.8) TWh, 1.8 TWh lower than in the corresponding period in 2015, due to lower hydro volumes. Thermal production totalled 0.1 (0.1) TWh in the Nordic countries. CO2-free production amounted to 99% (97%) of total production.
In January-September 2016, the Generation segment's comparable operating profit was EUR 330 (419) million, i.e. EUR 89 million lower than in the corresponding period in 2015, mainly due to the lower achieved power price and lower hydro volumes.
Operating profit of EUR 261 (-332) million was primarily affected by the IFRS accounting treatment (IAS 39) of derivatives, mainly used for hedging Fortum's power production, and by nuclear fund adjustments, amounting to EUR -69 (-750) million (Note 4). In 2015, the corresponding period included EUR -784 million from the decision on the early closure of two nuclear units in Sweden (Note 6).
The share of profits from associated companies and joint ventures totalled EUR -9 (-115) million (Note 14).
Generation's achieved Nordic power price was EUR 30.9 (32.6) per MWh, EUR 1.7 per MWh lower than in the corresponding period in 2015. The average system spot price of electricity in Nord Pool was EUR 24.4 (20.7) per MWh. The average area price in Finland was EUR 30.8 (29.3) per MWh and in Sweden SE3 (Stockholm) EUR 26.7 (21.7) per MWh.
The segment's total power generation in the Nordic countries was 34.5 (36.2) TWh. Thermal production totalled 0.2 (0.2) TWh. The CO2-free production amounted to 99% (99%) of total production.
City Solutions is responsible for developing sustainable city solutions into a growing business for Fortum. The segment comprises heating and cooling, waste-to-energy, biomass and other circular economy solutions, as well as electricity sales and services. The business operations are located in the Nordics, the Baltic countries and Poland. The segment also includes Fortum's 50% holding in Fortum Värme, which is a joint venture and is accounted for using the equity method.
| EUR million | III/16 | III/15 | I-III/16 | I-III/15 | 2015 | LTM |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sales | 237 | 185 | 894 | 835 | 1,187 | 1,246 |
| - heat sales | 50 | 49 | 293 | 293 | 423 | 423 |
| - power sales | 105 | 111 | 442 | 483 | 682 | 641 |
| - other sales | 82 | 25 | 159 | 59 | 83 | 182 |
| Comparable EBITDA | 15 | 12 | 133 | 129 | 209 | 213 |
| Comparable operating profit | -16 | -13 | 49 | 55 | 108 | 102 |
| of which electricity sales | 8 | 11 | 33 | 35 | 55 | 53 |
| Operating profit | -21 | -22 | 60 | 51 | 105 | 114 |
| Share of profits from associates and joint ventures |
-2 | -6 | 50 | 34 | 59 | 75 |
| Comparable net assets (at period-end) |
2,931 | 2,067 | 2,182 | |||
| Comparable return on net assets, % |
7.9 | 7.6 | ||||
| Capital expenditure and gross investments in shares |
716 | 33 | 871 | 67 | 128 | 932 |
| Number of employees | 2,347 | 1,440 | 1,417 |
In August, Fortum finalised the acquisition of Ekokem Corporation with the four biggest owners who represented approximately 81% of the shares. The transaction was originally announced in May 2016. At the end of the third quarter, minority shareholders representing approximately 17% of the shares had approved Fortum's tender offer, bringing Fortum's total ownership up to approximately 98%.
Ekokem has been integrated as a business area into the City Solutions division and has been consolidated into Fortum Group from the end of August 2016.
In the third quarter of 2016, sales increased to EUR 237 (185) million, mainly due to the consolidation of DUON and Ekokem. Heat sales volumes of the City Solutions segment amounted to 0.7 (0.6) TWh. Power sales volumes from CHP production totalled 0.3 (0.3) TWh.
Comparable operating profit was EUR -16 (-13) million. The result was burdened by higher sales and marketing costs and lower sales margin in retail sales due to strong competition in the Nordics.
Operating profit of EUR -21 (-22) million was affected mainly by Ekokem transaction costs and IFRS accounting treatment (IAS 39) of derivatives, totalling EUR -5 (-9) million (Note 4). The share of profits from associated companies and joint ventures totalled EUR -2 (-6) million, including mainly the share of profit from Fortum Värme (Note 14).
In January-September 2016, sales increased to EUR 894 (835) million, mainly due to the consolidation of DUON and Ekokem. Heat sales volumes of the City Solutions segment amounted to 5.4 (5.2) TWh. Power sales volumes from CHP production totalled 1.9 (1.7) TWh during the same period.
Comparable operating profit was EUR 49 (55) million. The result was mainly burdened by an unfavourable fuel mix in the beginning of the year and a lower achieved power price.
Operating profit of EUR 60 (51) million was affected mainly by sales gains, Ekokem transaction costs and IFRS accounting treatment (IAS 39) of derivatives totalling EUR 11 (-5) million (Note 4). The share of profits from associated companies and joint ventures totalled EUR 50 (34) million, including mainly the share of profit from Fortum Värme (Note 14).
| Heat sales by country, TWh | III/16 | III/15 | I-III/16 | I-III/15 | 2015 | LTM |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Finland | 0.4 | 0.3 | 2.2 | 2.1 | 3.1 | 3.2 |
| Poland | 0.2 | 0.2 | 2.2 | 2.2 | 3.4 | 3.4 |
| Other countries | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.9 | 0.8 | 1.2 | 1.3 |
| Total | 0.7 | 0.6 | 5.4 | 5.2 | 7.8 | 8.0 |
| Power sales, TWh | III/16 | III/15 | I-III/16 | I-III/15 | 2015 | LTM |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CHP | 0.3 | 0.3 | 1.9 | 1.7 | 2.5 | 2.7 |
| Electricity Sales | 2.0 | 2.9 | 8.7 | 10.3 | 14.2 | 12.6 |
| Total | 2.4 | 3.2 | 10.6 | 12.0 | 16.7 | 15.3 |
The Russia segment comprises power and heat generation and sales in Russia. The segment also includes Fortum's over 29% holding in TGC-1, which is an associated company and is accounted for using the equity method.
| EUR million | III/16 | III/15 | I-III/16 | I-III/15 | 2015 | LTM |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sales | 175 | 154 | 606 | 627 | 893 | 872 |
| - power sales | 157 | 131 | 485 | 479 | 661 | 667 |
| - heat sales | 17 | 23 | 118 | 147 | 228 | 199 |
| - other sales | 1 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 4 | 5 |
| Comparable EBITDA | 43 | 27 | 212 | 186 | 267 | 293 |
| Comparable operating profit | 12 | 0 | 125 | 132 | 201 | 194 |
| Operating profit | 12 | 1 | 159 | 134 | 203 | 228 |
| Share of profits from associates and joint ventures |
7 | 6 | 34 | 34 | 32 | 32 |
| Comparable net assets (at period end) |
2,916 | 2,736 | 2,561 | |||
| Comparable return on net assets, % | 8.2 | 8.2 | ||||
| Capital expenditure and gross investments in shares |
41 | 84 | 133 | 198 | 285 | 220 |
| Number of employees | 3,732 | 4,172 | 4,126 |
After the completion of the multi-year investment programme in March 2016, Fortum has 2,226 MW of new capacity i.e. generation capacity built after 2007, which under the Russian Government's capacity supply agreement (CSA – "new capacity") receives guaranteed payments for a period of 10 years after the commissioning of each new unit.
The received capacity payments vary depending on the age, location, type and size of the plant, as well as on seasonality and availability. The CSA payments can also vary somewhat annually as they are linked to Russian Government long-term bonds with 8 to 10 years maturity. In June 2016, the System Administrator of the wholesale market published data on the weighted average cost of capital (WACC) and the consumer price index (CPI) for 2015, which was used to calculate the capacity price on CSA in 2016. The CSA payments were revised upwards in the winter of 2016 accordingly to reflect the higher bond rates. In addition, the regulator will review the guaranteed CSA payments by re-examining earnings from the electricity-only market three and six years after the commissioning of a unit, and may revise the CSA payments accordingly.
All of Fortum's capacity generation built prior to 2008 (CCS – "old capacity"), totalling 2,214 MW in September 2016, was allowed to participate in the capacity selection for 2016, and the majority of Fortum's plants were selected. The volume of Fortum's installed capacity not selected in the auction totalled 195 MW (approximately 8.8% of Fortum's total old capacity in Russia), for which Fortum has obtained forced mode status, i.e. it is receiving payments for the capacity.
In the third quarter of 2016, the Russia segment's power sales volumes amounted to 6.4 (5.9) TWh and heat sales volumes totaled 1.5 (2.8) TWh. The divestment of the Tobolsk CHP plant in February 2016 was the main reason for the decrease in heat sales volumes compared to the third quarter of 2015.
The Russia segment's comparable operating profit was EUR 12 (0) million. The positive effect came from higher received CSA payments following the adjustments of the WACC component in the CSA prices and the commissioning of the new units. The Russian rouble had a positive effect of EUR 4 million.
Operating profit was EUR 12 (1) million.
The share of profits from associated companies and joint ventures totalled EUR 7 (6) million, including the share of TGC-1 (Note 14).
In January-September 2016, the Russia segment's power sales volumes amounted to 21.6 (20.8) TWh and heat sales volumes totalled 12.9 (16.7) TWh. Electricity volumes increased mainly due to the commissioning of two new units in Chelyabinsk. The divestment of the Tobolsk CHP plant in February 2016 decreased the growth impact in both electricity and heat volumes.
The Russia segment's comparable operating profit was EUR 125 (132) million, including CSA provision releases of EUR 2 (32) million. The positive effect came from higher received CSA payments following the adjustments of the WACC component in the CSA prices and the commissioning of the new units. The Russian rouble had a negative effect of EUR 15 million.
Operating profit was EUR 159 (134) million, including sales gains of EUR 32 (1) million (Note 4).
The share of profits from associated companies and joint ventures totalled EUR 34 (34) million, including the share of TGC-1 (Note 14).
Fortum started receiving capacity payments under the Russian Government's capacity supply agreement (CSA) for Chelyabinsk 2 as of 1 March 2016. Fortum's extensive investment programme in Russia that started in 2008 is now completed, as the final unit of the programme has started its commercial operation.
| Key electricity, capacity and gas prices for Fortum Russia |
III/16 | III/15 | I-III/16 | I-III/15 | 2015 | LTM |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Electricity spot price (market price), Urals hub, RUB/MWh |
1,125 | 1,051 | 1,052 | 1,041 | 1,047 | 1,055 |
| Average regulated gas price, Urals region, RUB/1000 m3 |
3,614 | 3,614 | 3,614 | 3,446 | 3,488 | 3,614 |
| Average capacity price for CCS "old capacity", tRUB/MW/month* |
130 | 134 | 136 | 146 | 149 | 142 |
| Average capacity price for CSA "new capacity", tRUB/MW/month* |
724 | 567 | 777 | 620 | 641 | 759 |
| Average capacity price, tRUB/MW/month | 433 | 319 | 456 | 346 | 359 | 440 |
| Achieved power price for Fortum in Russia, RUB/MWh |
1,796 | 1,612 | 1,704 | 1,556 | 1,555 | 1,664 |
| Achieved power price for Fortum in Russia, EUR/MWh** |
24.6 | 22.3 | 22.5 | 23.0 | 22.5 | 22.1 |
* Capacity prices paid for the capacity volumes, excluding unplanned outages, repairs and own consumption
** Translated using average exchange rate
| EUR million | III/16 | III/15 | I-III/16 | I-III/15 | 2015 | LTM |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sales | - | - | - | 274 | 274 | - |
| - distribution network transmission | - | - | - | 229 | 229 | - |
| - regional network transmission | - | - | - | 40 | 40 | - |
| - other sales | - | - | - | 7 | 7 | - |
| Comparable EBITDA | - | - | - | 163 | 163 | - |
| Comparable operating profit | - | - | - | 114 | 114 | - |
| Operating profit | - | - | - | 4,395 | 4,395 | - |
| Capital expenditure and gross investments in shares |
- | - | - | 44 | 44 | - |
| Number of employees | - | - | - | - | - | - |
The table above includes the Swedish electricity distribution business for January-May 2015.
Fortum has had no distribution business since June 2015 when it completed the divestment of its Swedish electricity distribution business. The transaction concluded the divestment of Fortum's Distribution segment, a process that began in 2013.
Capital expenditures and investments in shares for continuing operations totalled EUR 825 (171) million in the third quarter of 2016. Investments, excluding acquisitions, were EUR 141 (170) million (Note 4).
Capital expenditures and investments in shares for continuing operations totalled EUR 1,172 (391) million in January-September 2016. Investments, excluding acquisitions, were EUR 356 (385) million (Note 4).
Fortum expects to start the supply of power and heat from new power plants and to upgrade existing plants as follows:
| Type | Electricity capacity, MW |
Heat capacity, MW |
Supply starts |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Generation | ||||
| Hydro refurbishment, Nordic | Hydro | 12 | 2016 | |
| Loviisa 1 and 2 refurbishment, Finland |
Nuclear | 11 | 2016 | |
| City Solutions | ||||
| Zabrze, Poland | CHP | 75 | 145 | 2018 |
| Russia | ||||
| Ulyanovsk | Wind | 35 | 2017 | |
| Other | ||||
| Bhadla, India | Solar | 70 | 2017 | |
| Karnataka, India | Solar | 100 | 2017 | |
| Blaiken, Sweden | Wind | 12 | 2016 | |
| Solberg, Sweden | Wind | 75* | 2018 |
* Skellefteå Kraft AB (SKAB is participating in the project with a 50% (37.5 MW) share
Through its interest in Teollisuuden Voima Oyj (TVO), Fortum is participating in the building of Olkiluoto 3 (OL3), a 1,600-MW nuclear power plant unit in Finland. The start of commercial electricity production of the plant is expected to take place in late 2018, according to the plant supplier AREVA-Siemens Consortium. TVO has withdrawn a EUR 300 million shareholder loan from the total EUR 600 million commitments. Fortum's share of the EUR 300 million withdrawal is approximately EUR 75 million. Fortum's remaining commitment for OL3 is EUR 75 million (Note 15).
In February, Fortum agreed to sell its 51.4% shareholding in the Estonian natural gas import, sales and distribution company AS Eesti Gaas. Fortum finalised the transaction in March 2016.
In March, Fortum completed the acquisition of 93.35% of shares in the Polish electricity and gas sales company Grupa DUON S.A. In April, Fortum announced that it had purchased the remaining shares through a mandatory squeeze-out procedure, after which the extraordinary meeting of shareholders of Grupa DUON S.A. decided to delist the company from the Warsaw Stock Exchange.
In May, Fortum signed an agreement with the four biggest owners of Ekokem Corporation, representing approximately 81% of the shares, to acquire their shareholding in the company for approximately EUR 470 million. This would correspond to a debt- and cash-free purchase price of approximately EUR 700 million for 100% of the company, as Fortum made a tender offer to all remaining shareholders at the same price (EUR 165 per share). Fortum obtained the required competition clearances in July. Having reached the necessary ownership thresholds, Fortum will proceed with a minority redemption process. At the end of September 2016, Fortum's total ownership was approximately 98%.
In February, Fortum sold its 100% shareholding in its Russian subsidiary OOO Tobolsk CHP. OOO Tobolsk CHP owns and operates the combined heat and power plant in the city of Tobolsk in Western Siberia.
In January, Fortum won a reverse auction in India for a 70-MW solar project with a fixed tariff of 4.34 INR/kWh (about 60 EUR/MWh) for 25 years. In April, Fortum signed the Power Purchase Agreement with NTPC, India's largest utility.
In February, Fortum acquired a 75-MW wind farm project. The Solberg site, located in Västernorrland County in northern Sweden, is fully-permitted and construction-ready. In April, Fortum made a final investment decision on the project together with Skellefteå Kraft AB (SKAB), which is participating in the project with a 50% share.
In April, Fortum won the bid in a reverse auction in India for a 100-MW solar project. The solar power plant will be built in Karnataka with a fixed tariff of 4.79 INR/kWh for 25 years.
| January-September | No. of shares | Total value | High | Low | Average | Last |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 | traded | EUR | EUR | EUR | 1) EUR | EUR |
| FUM1V | 474,656,832 | 6,311,905,880 | 15.27 | 10.99 | 13.30 | 14.38 |
1) Volume weighted average
| September 30, 2016 |
September 30, 2015 |
|
|---|---|---|
| Market capitalisation, EUR million | 12,775 | 11,753 |
| No. of shareholders | 134,532 | 128,682 |
| Finnish State holding, % | 50.8 | 50.8 |
| Nominee registrations and direct foreign shareholders, % | 27.7 | 28.0 |
| Households, % | 11.2 | 10.4 |
| Financial and insurance corporations, % | 1.6 | 2.2 |
| Other Finnish investors, % | 8.7 | 8.6 |
In addition to the Nasdaq Helsinki, Fortum shares were traded on several alternative market places, for example Boat, BATS Chi-X and Turquoise, and on the OTC market. During January-September 2016, approximately 62% of Fortum's shares were traded on markets other than the Nasdaq Helsinki.
On 30 September 2016, Fortum Corporation's share capital was EUR 3,046,185,953 and the total number of registered shares was 888,367,045. Fortum Corporation did not own its own shares.
On 5 April 2016, the Annual General Meeting decided to authorise the Board of Directors to decide on the repurchase and disposal of the company's own shares up to a maximum number of 20,000,000 shares, which corresponds to approximately 2.25 per cent of all the shares in the company. The authorisation is effective for a period of 18 months from the resolution of the General Meeting. The authorisation has not been used by the end of the third quarter.
Fortum's operations are mainly based in the Nordic countries, Russia and the Baltic Rim area. The total number of employees at the end of September 2016 was 8,185 (7,835 at the end of 2015).
Generation had 1,024 (1,341) employees; City Solutions 2,347 (1,417); Russia 3,732 (4,126); and Other 1,082 (951). Generation's number of employees decreased, mainly due to the reorganisation of the Group; City Solution's increased, mainly due to the acquisition of DUON and Ekokem; and Russia's decreased, due to the divestment of Tobolsk. Also Other increased, due to the reorganisation of the Group.
Sustainability is at the core of Fortum's strategy and, alongside Fortum's current businesses, the company is carefully exploring and developing new sources of growth within renewable energy production.
Fortum's goal is to be at the forefront of energy technology and application development. To accelerate innovation and the commercialisation of new offerings, Fortum will strengthen its in-house focus on innovation and digitalisation, partner with global leading suppliers, promising technology companies and research institutions, and make direct and indirect investments in start-ups with promising new innovations.
The Group reports its R&D expenditure on a yearly basis. In 2015, Fortum's R&D expenditure was EUR 47 (41) million, or 1.4% (1.0%) of sales.
Fortum strives for balanced management of economic, social and environmental responsibility in the company's operations. Fortum's sustainability targets consist of both Group-level key indicators and division-level indicators.
The Group-level sustainability targets emphasise Fortum's role in society and measure not only environmental and safety targets, but also Fortum's reputation, customer satisfaction, employee wellbeing, and the security of production of power and heat. At the beginning of 2016, the Grouplevel target-setting was changed by taking work well-being, measured as a percentage of sicknessrelated absences, as a new Group target. In terms of specific carbon dioxide emissions (gCO2/kWh), Fortum now focuses on measuring Group-level specific emissions from total energy production.
The achievement of the sustainability targets is monitored in the monthly, quarterly and annual reporting. Sustainability target-setting and follow-up, as well as the approval of Fortum's Sustainability policy, and the review of Fortum's Sustainability Reporting, are included in the working order of the Board of Directors. Complete data on Fortum's sustainability performance is published on Fortum's Sustainability website.
The company is listed on the Nasdaq Helsinki exchange and is included in the STOXX Global ESG Leaders, OMX GES Sustainability Finland, and ECPI® indices. Fortum is also included in the Carbon Disclosure Project's Nordic Climate Index and has received a Prime Status (B-) rating by the German oekom research AG.
| Targets | III/16 | I-III/16 | Five-year average |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Specific CO2 emissions from total energy production (electricity and heat) as a five-year average, g/kWh |
< 200 | 190 | 178 | 188 |
| Major EHS incidents, number | ≤ 23 | 4 | 13 | - |
| Energy availability of CHP plants, % | > 95 | 96.0 | 98.0 | - |
| Total recordable injury frequency (TRIF) for own personnel, number |
≤ 2.5 | 1.8 | 1.6 | - |
| Lost workday injury frequency (LWIF) for own personnel, number |
≤ 1.0 | 0.9 | 0.9 | - |
| Lost workday injury frequency (LWIF) for contractors, number |
≤ 3.0 | 2.6 | 2.7 | - |
| Serious occupational accidents, number | ≤ 8 | 4 | 10 | - |
| Sickness-related absences**, % | ≤2.4 | 1.8 | 2.3 | - |
* Targets for reputation, customer satisfaction and energy efficiency are monitored annually. Ekokem and Duon excluded from all sustainability figures.
** Sickness-related absences: excluding September
For Fortum, economic responsibility means competitiveness, performance excellence and marketdriven production, which create long-term value for our stakeholders and enable profitable growth. We manage our supply chain in a responsible manner.
Fortum's goal is to achieve excellent financial performance in strategically selected core areas through strong competence and responsible ways of operating. Fortum measures financial performance with return on capital employed (target: 10%) and capital structure (target: comparable net debt/EBITDA around 2.5). In addition, as of 1 January 2014, Fortum has used the applicable Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) G4 indicators for reporting economic responsibility.
Fortum expects its business partners to act responsibly and to comply with the Fortum Code of Conduct and the Fortum Supplier Code of Conduct. Fortum assesses the performance of its business partners with supplier qualification and supplier audits. In January-September 2016, Fortum audited 6 (7) suppliers in India, Poland, China, Russia and Lithuania. In September, Fortum signed a contract with an external service provider for conducting supplier sustainability audits.
Energy and resource efficiency, climate change mitigation, and reducing environmental impacts are emphasised in Fortum's environmental responsibility. The company's know-how in CO2-free hydro and nuclear power production and in energy-efficient combined heat and power production, investments in solar and wind power, as well as solutions for sustainable cities play a key role in this. Through research and development activities, Fortum creates prerequisites for environmentally benign energy solutions. Fortum's Group-level environmental targets are related to CO2 emissions, energy efficiency, and major environmental, health and safety (EHS) incidents. At the end of September 2016, ISO 14001 certification covered 99.9% of Fortum's power and heat production worldwide.
Fortum's climate target over the next five years is for total specific CO2 emissions from both electricity and heat production in all countries to be below 200 g/kWh. The target is calculated as a five-year average. At the end of September 2016, the total specific CO2 emissions from energy production were at 188 (193) g/kWh, which is better than the target level.
Fortum's total CO2 emissions in January-September 2016 amounted to 12.6 (13.4) million tonnes (Mt), of which 1.6 (1.4) Mt were within the EU's emissions trading scheme (ETS). Fortum's free emissions allowances in 2015 were 1.3 Mt and the estimate for 2016 is 1.1 Mt.
| Fortum's total CO2 emissions * (million tonnes, Mt) |
III/16 | III/15 | I-III16 | I-III/15 | 2015 | LTM |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total emissions | 3.3 | 3.3 | 12.6 | 13.4 | 19.2 | 18.3 |
| Emissions subject to ETS | 0.3 | 0.3 | 1.6 | 1.4 | 2.1 | 2.3 |
| Free emissions allocation | 1.3 | |||||
| Emissions in Russia | 3.0 | 3.1 | 10.9 | 11.9 | 17.0 | 15.9 |
* Ekokem and Duon excluded from all sustainability figures.
By 2020, Fortum's target is to achieve an energy savings of more than 1,400 GWh annually, compared to 2012. Ongoing projects in 2016 include, among others, hydropower plant refurbishments in Finland and Sweden, a new CHP plant in Zabrze in Poland, wind power projects in Sweden and Russia, and solar projects in India. The projects in 2016 are estimated to result in an annual energy savings of 105 GWh. Fortum's target is fewer than 23 major EHS incidents annually. In January-September 2016, 13 (15) major EHS incidents took place in Fortum's operations: the incidents included eight non-compliances with environmental permits, three fires and two explosion. These incidents did not have significant environmental or financial impacts.
Fortum's social responsibility emphasises the secure supply of electricity and heat, creating solutions for sustainable cities, operational and occupational safety, as well as ethical business operations and compliance with regulations. At the end of September 2016, OHSAS 18001 certification covered 99.9% of Fortum's power and heat production worldwide.
The average energy availability of Fortum's CHP plants in January-September 2016 was 98.0% (97.0%), which is clearly above the annual target level of 95%.
The total recordable injury frequency (TRIF) for Fortum employees in January-September 2016 was 1.6 (1.7) per one million working hours, which is better than the Group-level frequency target (≤ 2.5). The lost-workday injury frequency for own personnel was 0.9 (1.2) and for contractors 2.7 (3.1), both below the set target levels. The number of serious occupational accidents was 10 (12). Implementation of the agreed actions to improve contractor safety continues with a specific focus on contractor safety and integration of Ekokem and Duon operations. Fortum's target is to eliminate serious injuries by 2020. The percentage of sickness-related absences in January-August 2016 was 2.3, which is below the target level.
In February 2016, Fortum announced that it will reorganise its corporate structure effective 1 April 2016. The target of the new organisation is to enable the implementation of the company's new vision and strategy, which were announced on 3 February 2016. The new organisation comprises three business divisions: Generation, City Solutions, and Russia. In addition, two development units focusing on growing new businesses have been established: M&A and Solar & Wind Development,
and Technology and New Ventures. The new organisation will also have four staff functions: Finance; Legal; Strategy, People and Performance; and Corporate Affairs and Communications.
Fortum's Executive Management Team, as of 1 April 2016:
Pekka Lundmark, President and CEO Matti Ruotsala, Deputy CEO until his planned retirement in summer 2017 Timo Karttinen, CFO Tiina Tuomela, Executive Vice President, Generation Markus Rauramo, Executive Vice President, City Solutions Alexander Chuvaev, Executive Vice President, Russia Per Langer, Senior Vice President, Technology and New Ventures Kari Kautinen, Senior Vice President, M&A and Solar & Wind Development Sirpa-Helena Sormunen, General Counsel Risto Penttinen, Senior Vice President, Strategy, People and Performance Arto Räty, Senior Vice President, Corporate Affairs and Communications
All members of the Executive Management Team report to the President and CEO, except for the General Counsel, who reports to the CFO.
Fortum Corporation's Annual General Meeting, which was held in Helsinki on 5 April 2016, adopted the financial statements of the parent company and the Group for the financial period 1 January - 31 December 2015, and discharged the members of Fortum's Board of Directors as well as the President and CEO and the deputy CEO from liability for the year 2015.
The Annual General Meeting decided to pay a dividend of EUR 1.10 per share for the financial year that ended on 31 December 2015. The record date for the dividend payment was 7 April 2016, and the dividend payment date was 14 April 2016.
The Annual General Meeting confirmed the number of members in the Board of Directors to be eight. Ms. Sari Baldauf was re-elected as Chairman, Mr. Kim Ignatius was elected as Deputy Chairman, Ms. Minoo Akhtarzand, Mr. Heinz-Werner Binzel, Ms. Eva Hamilton, Mr. Tapio Kuula and Mr. Jyrki Talvitie were re-elected as members, and Mr. Veli-Matti Reinikkala was elected as a new member.
The Annual General Meeting confirmed the remuneration of EUR 75,000 per year to the Chairman, EUR 57,000 per year to the Deputy Chairman and EUR 40,000 per year to each member of the Board, as well as EUR 57,000 per year to the Board member acting as the Chairman of the Audit and Risk Committee if he or she is not at the same time acting as Chairman or Deputy Chairman of the Board. In addition, a EUR 600 meeting fee is paid for Board meetings as well as for committee meetings. The meeting fee is doubled for Board members who live outside Finland in Europe and tripled for members living outside Europe. For Board members living in Finland, the fee for each Board and Board Committee meeting will be doubled for meetings held outside Finland, and tripled for meetings outside Europe. For Board and Committee meetings held as a telephone conference, the basic meeting fee will be paid to all members. No fee will be paid for decisions made without a separate meeting.
In addition, Authorised Public Accountant Deloitte & Touche Ltd was re-elected as auditor, and the auditor's fee is paid pursuant to an invoice approved by the company.
The Annual General Meeting also authorised the Board of Directors to decide on the repurchase of the company's own shares up to a maximum number of 20,000,000 shares, which corresponds to approximately 2.25 per cent of all the shares in the company. It was also decided that own shares could be disposed of in connection with acquisitions, investments or other business transactions, or to be retained or cancelled. The disposals could not be made for the purposes of the company's incentive and remuneration schemes.
After the Annual General Meeting, Fortum's Board of Directors elected from among its members to the Nomination and Remuneration Committee Sari Baldauf as Chairman, and Eva Hamilton, Tapio Kuula and Veli-Matti Reinikkala as members.
Furthermore, the Board elected to the Audit and Risk Committee Kim Ignatius as Chairman, and Minoo Akhtarzand, Heinz-Werner Binzel and Jyrki Talvitie as members.
In September 2016, Eero Heliövaara (Chairman), Director General of Finnish Government Ownership Steering Department, Timo Ritakallio, President and CEO, Ilmarinen Mutual Pension Insurance Company and Liisa Hyssälä, Director General, The Social Insurance Institution of Finland KELA, were appointed to Fortum's Shareholders' Nomination Board. In addition, the Chairman of Fortum's Board of Directors Sari Baldauf is a member of the Shareholders' Nomination Board.
Fortum's financial results are exposed to a number of economic, strategic, political, financial and operational risks. One of the key factors influencing Fortum's business performance is the wholesale price of electricity in the Nordic region. The key drivers behind the wholesale price development in the Nordic region are the supply-demand balance, the prices of fuel and CO2 emissions allowances, and the hydrological situation.
The continued uncertainty in the global and European economies has kept the outlook for economic growth unpredictable. The overall economic uncertainty impacts commodity and CO2 emissions allowance prices, and this could maintain downward pressure on the Nordic wholesale price of electricity. In Fortum's Russian business, the key drivers are economic growth, the rouble exchange rate, regulation around the heat business, and further development of electricity and capacity markets. In all regions, fuel prices and power plant availability also impact profitability. In addition, increased volatility in exchange rates due to financial turbulence could have both translation and transaction effects on Fortum's financials, especially through the Russian rouble and Swedish krona. In the Nordic countries, the regulatory and fiscal environment for the energy sector has also added risks for utility companies.
Despite macroeconomic uncertainty, electricity is expected to continue to gain a higher share of total energy consumption. Electricity demand in the Nordic countries is expected to grow by approximately 0.5% on average, while the growth rate for the next few years will largely be determined by macroeconomic developments in Europe, and especially in the Nordic countries.
During January-September 2016, oil and coal prices increased, while the price of CO2 emission allowances (EUA) declined. The price of electricity for the upcoming twelve months appreciated in the Nordic area as well as in Germany, and both are now on higher levels than at the end of the third quarter of 2015.
In mid-October 2016, the quotation for coal (ICE Rotterdam) for the remainder of 2016 was around USD 78 per tonne, and for CO2 emission allowances for 2016 around EUR 6 per tonne. The Nordic system electricity forward price in Nasdaq Commodities for the rest of 2016 was around EUR 37 per MWh and for 2017 around EUR 30 per MWh. In Germany, the electricity forward price for the rest of 2016 was around EUR 37 per MWh and for 2017 around EUR 32 per MWh. Nordic water reservoirs were about 4 TWh below the long-term average and 14 TWh below the corresponding level in 2015.
The Generation segment's achieved Nordic power price typically depends on such factors as the hedge ratios, hedge prices, spot prices, availability and utilisation of Fortum's flexible production portfolio, and currency fluctuations. Excluding the potential effects from changes in the power generation mix, a 1 EUR/MWh change in the Generation segment's Nordic power sales achieved price will result in an approximately EUR 45 million change in Fortum's annual comparable operating profit. In addition, the comparable operating profit of the Generation segment will be affected by the possible thermal power generation volumes and its profits.
In Finland, the technical plan and cost estimates for nuclear waste management are updated every third year. The new technical plan was published in 2015 and related cost estimates were updated during the second quarter of 2016. The update had a minor positive impact on Fortum and is included in the result for the second quarter of 2016.
As a result of the nuclear stress tests in the EU, the Swedish nuclear safety authority (SSM) has decided to propose new regulations for Swedish nuclear reactors. The process is ongoing. Fortum emphasises that maintaining a high level of nuclear safety is the highest priority, but considers EUlevel harmonisation of nuclear safety requirements to be of continued importance.
In 2015, the Swedish Government increased the nuclear waste fund fee from approximately 0.022 to approximately 0.04 SEK/kWh for the 2015-2017 period. The estimated impact on Fortum is approximately EUR 25 million annually. The process to review the Swedish nuclear waste fees is done in a three-year cycle. The Swedish Nuclear Fuel and Waste Management Co (SKB) will update the new technical plan in January 2017 for SSM to review. The final decision on the new nuclear waste fees will be made by the Swedish Government in December 2017. However, as a result of the decision on early closure of nuclear power plants, the Swedish Radiation Safety Authority, SSM, recalculated the waste fees for the Oskarshamn and Ringhals power plants.
In Sweden, the key political parties (representing 75% of parliament) announced a new framework agreement on energy policy in June 2016. It was decided that: (1) the tax on nuclear thermal effect will be phased out over two years starting in 2017, (2) the regulatory framework for the nuclear waste fund will be reformed in order to enhance yield, (3) the lifetime in the waste fee calculation would possibly be extended from 40 to 50 years, and (4) the third-party liability for nuclear accidents will increase, ratifying a decision made earlier. No date was mentioned for a mandatory nuclear phase out, but a vision of a 100% RES power system by 2040 was stated.
In September the Swedish government presented the budget proposal for the coming years, which included a timetable for the tax reductions in the energy commission agreement. The budget states that the nuclear capacity tax will be reduced to 1500 SEK/MW per month from 1 July 2017 and abolished on 1 January 2018. In 2016, the Swedish nuclear capacity tax for Fortum is estimated to be approximately EUR 84 million. In 2017, the tax is estimated to decrease with approximately EUR 32 million due to the tax decrease and another EUR 5 million due to the premature closure of Oskarshamn 1 in the middle of the year. In 2018, there is no capacity tax.
A decision was also made to decrease the hydropower real-estate tax over a four-year period beginning in 2017, from todays 2.8% to 0.5%. The real-estate tax on hydro will, as stated in the government's budget, be reduced in four steps: in January 2017 to 2.2%; in January 2018 to 1.6%; in January 2019 to 1.0%; and in January 2020 to 0.5%. In 2016, the Swedish hydropower real-estate tax is estimated to be approximately EUR 115 million. In 2017, the tax is estimated to decrease with approximately EUR 20 million.
In addition to the decrease in the tax rate, the hydropower real-estate tax values, which are linked to electricity prices, will be updated starting 2019. The real-estate tax values are updated every six years. With the current low electricity prices the tax values in 2019 will be clearly lower than today.
The process for renewing existing hydro permits will also be reformed, primarily in order to safeguard small hydro.
The tax reductions are planned to be financed through a higher electricity consumption tax that will mainly affect households. Electricity-intensive industries will be exempt.
In October, the Swedish Energy Agency is expected to make a concrete proposal on how to increase the production of renewable electricity by 18 TWh in 2020-2030.
The work for increased transmission capacity both within Sweden and to neighbouring countries will continue, as will efforts to promote a well-functioning retail market in the Nordic region.
All the above mentioned decisions are positive and a step in the right direction, as all production forms are more evenly taxed. However, some questions remain regarding deployment of green certificates for the 2020-2030 period. The decisions will not impact the nuclear closures that have already been decided on in Sweden.
OKG AB decided in 2015 to permanently discontinue electricity production at Oskarshamn unit 1 and to start decommissioning after the permission for service operation has been granted by the relevant Swedish authorities. The first two stages of the decommissioning process were approved in June 2016. The date for discontinued production and the start of decommissioning has been set to 30 June 2017. Oskarshamn unit 2, which has been out of operation since June 2013 due to an extensive safety modernisation, will stay out of operation. The closing processes are estimated to take several years.
In May, the Finnish Government decided to increase the tax on heating fuels by EUR 90 million annually from 2017 onwards. The negative impact on Fortum is estimated to be approximately EUR 5 million per year.
The Russia segment's new capacity generation built after 2007 under the Russian Government's capacity supply agreement (CSA) is a key driver for earnings growth in Russia, as it is expected to bring income from new volumes sold and also to receive considerably higher capacity payments than the old capacity. The regulation related to the time frame (10 vs.15 years) of the calculation of capacity payments was finally approved in June 2016. The decision was made to keep the current 10-year time frame, and Fortum will hence receive guaranteed capacity payments for a period of 10 years from the commissioning of a plant. The received CSA payment will vary depending on the age, location, size and type of the plants, as well as on seasonality and availability. CSA payments can vary somewhat annually because they are linked to Russian Government long-term bonds with 8 to 10 years maturity. In addition, the regulator will review the earnings from the electricity-only
market three years and six years after the commissioning of a unit and could revise the CSA payments accordingly.
According to rules approved by the Russian Government in 2015, the competitive capacity selection for generation built prior to 2008 (CCS, without capacity supply agreements) takes place annually. At the end of 2015, the CCS for 2016 and the long-term CCS for 2017-2019 were held. In September of 2016, the long-term CCS for 2020 was held. The majority of Fortum's plants were selected. The volume of Fortum's installed "old" capacity not selected in the auction totalled 195 MW (out of 2,214 MW), for which Fortum has obtained forced mode status, i.e. it will receive payments for the capacity.
In 2014, the new heat market model roadmap proposed by the Ministry of Energy was approved by the Russian Government. If implemented, the reform should provide heat market liberalisation by 2020 or, in some specific areas, by 2023. In May 2016, the draft law on the heat reform was submitted by the Russian Government to the state Duma (Parliament). The law still requires the consent of the regional and local authorities before starting the reform in certain pilot regions. The Parliament hearings are expected in the fourth quarter of 2016.
The targeted operating profit (EBIT) level of RUB 18.2 billion in the Russia segment is expected to be reached during 2017-2018. The segment's profits are impacted by changes in power demand, gas prices and other regulatory developments. Economic sanctions, the currency crisis, oil prices and the surge in inflation have impacted overall demand. As a result, gas prices and electricity prices have not developed favourably as expected. Fortum estimates the Russian annual average gas price growth to be 3.6% in 2016 which is lower than the previous estimate of 4.9% because no indexation of gas tariffs is expected during 2016.
The euro-denominated result level will be volatile due to the translation effect. The income statements of non-euro subsidiaries are translated into the Group reporting currency using average exchange rates. The Russia segment's result is also impacted by seasonal volatility caused by the nature of the heat business, with the first and last quarter being clearly the strongest.
In December 2014, Fortum, Gazprom Energoholding LLC and Rosatom State Corporation signed a protocol to start a restructuring process of the ownership of TGC-1 in Russia. The discussions have not yet come to a conclusion. It is not possible to estimate the timetable.
Fortum currently expects its capital expenditure, excluding acquisitions, for its continuing operations in 2016 to be approximately EUR 650 million. The annual maintenance capital expenditure is estimated to be about EUR 300-350 million in 2016, below the level of depreciation.
The effective corporate income tax rate for Fortum in 2016 is estimated to be 19-21%, excluding the impact of the share of profits of associated companies and joint ventures, non-taxable capital gains and non-recurring items.
At the end of September 2016, approximately 80% of Generation's estimated Nordic power sales volume was hedged at EUR 29 per MWh for the remainder of 2016. The corresponding figures for the 2017 calendar year were approximately 50% at EUR 28 per MWh, and for the calendar year 2018 approximately 30% at EUR 25 per MWh.
The reported hedge ratios may vary significantly, depending on Fortum's actions on the electricity derivatives markets. Hedges are mainly financial contracts, most of them Nasdaq Commodities forwards.
The Annual General Meeting decided to pay a dividend of EUR 1.10 per share for the financial year that ended 31 December 2015.
The record date for the dividend was 7 April 2016, and the dividend payment date was 14 April 2016.
Espoo, 24 October 2016
Fortum Corporation Board of Directors
Pekka Lundmark, President and CEO, tel. +358 10 452 4112 Timo Karttinen, CFO, tel. +358 10 453 6555
Investor Relations & Financial Communications, Sophie Jolly, tel. +358 10 453 2552, Rauno Tiihonen, tel. +358 10 453 6150, Marja Mäkinen, tel. +358 10 452 3338, Måns Holmberg, tel. +358 10 452 1111, and [email protected]
Media, Corporate Press Officer, Pauliina Vuosio, tel. + 358 50 453 2383
The condensed interim report has been prepared in accordance with International Accounting Standard (IAS) 34, Interim Financial Reporting, as adopted by the EU. The interim financials have not been audited.
Fortum Corporation's Financial Statements Bulletin for 2016 will be published on 2 February 2017, at approximately 9.00 EET.
Fortum's Financial Statements and Operating and Financial Review for 2016 will be published during week 10 at the latest.
Fortum will publish three interim reports in 2017:
Fortum's Annual General Meeting is planned to take place on 4 April 2017 and the possible dividend-related dates planned for 2017 are:
Fortum's Capital Markets Day will take place on 16 November 2016 at Fortum HQ, Keilaniementie 1 Espoo. The invitation is available at www.fortum.com/investors.
Distribution:
Nasdaq Helsinki Key media www.fortum.com
More information, including detailed quarterly information, is available on Fortum's website at www.fortum.com/investors
| Last | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1-Q3 | Q1-Q3 | twelve | |||||
| EUR million | Note | Q3 2016 | Q3 2015 | 2016 | 2015 | 2015 | months |
| Continuing operations: | |||||||
| Sales | 4, 9 | 732 | 661 | 2,489 | 2,495 | 3,459 | 3,453 |
| Other income | 8 | 10 | 27 | 29 | 38 | 36 | |
| Materials and services | -394 | -312 | -1,230 | -1,108 | -1,515 | -1,637 | |
| Employee benefits | -75 | -80 | -235 | -256 | -351 | -330 | |
| Depreciation and amortisation | 4,12,13 | -93 | -83 | -264 | -254 | -346 | -356 |
| Other expenses | -119 | -116 | -331 | -341 | -477 | -467 | |
| Comparable operating profit | 4 | 58 | 79 | 455 | 565 | 808 | 698 |
| Items affecting comparability | -65 | -761 | -25 | -752 | -958 | -231 | |
| Operating profit | 4 | -6 | -682 | 430 | -188 | -150 | 468 |
| Share of profit/loss of associates and joint ventures | 4, 14 | 11 | -95 | 116 | -15 | 20 | 151 |
| Interest expense | -38 | -52 | -132 | -156 | -203 | -179 | |
| Interest income | 7 | 12 | 23 | 41 | 51 | 33 | |
| Fair value gains and losses on financial instruments | -2 | -2 | 0 | -14 | -18 | -4 | |
| Other financial expenses - net | -12 | 0 | -26 | 6 | -4 | -36 | |
| Finance costs - net | -44 | -42 | -135 | -123 | -175 | -187 | |
| Profit before income tax | -40 | -818 | 411 | -325 | -305 | 431 | |
| Income tax expense | 10 | 9 | 160 | -54 | 80 | 78 | -56 |
| Profit for the period from continuing operations | -31 | -659 | 357 | -246 | -228 | 375 | |
| Profit for the period from discontinued operations | 7 | - | - | - | 4,369 | 4,369 | - |
| Profit for the period | -31 | -659 | 357 | 4,123 | 4,142 | 376 | |
| Attributable to: | |||||||
| Owners of the parent | -31 | -654 | 352 | 4,124 | 4,138 | 366 | |
| Non-controlling interests | 0 | -5 | 6 | -1 | 4 | 11 | |
| -31 | -659 | 357 | 4,123 | 4,142 | 376 | ||
| Earnings per share for profit attributable to the equity owners of the company (EUR per share) |
|||||||
| Total Fortum | -0.03 | -0.74 | 0.40 | 4.64 | 4.66 | 0.41 | |
| Continuing operations | -0.03 | -0.74 | 0.40 | -0.28 | -0.26 | 0.41 | |
| Discontinued operations | 7 | - | - | - | 4.92 | 4.92 | - |
As Fortum currently has no dilutive instruments outstanding, diluted earnings per share is the same as basic earnings per share.
| Last | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1-Q3 | Q1-Q3 | twelve | |||||
| EUR million | Note | Q3 2016 | Q3 2015 | 2016 | 2015 | 2015 | months |
| Comparable operating profit | 58 | 79 | 455 | 565 | 808 | 698 | |
| Impairment charges | 4 | 0 | -784 | 0 | -799 | -918 | -119 |
| Capital gains and other | 4, 8 | -10 | 14 | 36 | 21 | 22 | 37 |
| Changes in fair values of derivatives hedging future cash flow | 4 | -57 | 5 | -64 | 16 | -78 | -158 |
| Nuclear fund adjustment | 4 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 9 | 16 | 10 |
| Items affecting comparability | -65 | -761 | -25 | -752 | -958 | -231 | |
| Operating profit | -6 | -682 | 430 | -188 | -150 | 468 |
The decision made by the Extraordinary shareholders' meeting of OKG AB in October 2015 to close Oskarshamn nuclear power plant units 1 and 2 in Sweden impacted net result for Q3/2015 attributable to the owners of the parent by EUR -710 million (2015: EUR -729 million). The impact is recognised on several rows of the income statement, but major part is included in Impairment charges, in Items affecting comparability, see Note 6 Impairment charges.
Distribution segment has been treated as discontinued operations according to IFRS 5 in the comparative period 2015. For further information, see Note 7 Discontinued operations.
| Last | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1-Q3 | Q1-Q3 | twelve | ||||
| EUR million | Q3 2016 | Q3 2015 | 2016 | 2015 | 2015 | months |
| Profit for the period | -31 | -659 | 357 | 4,123 | 4,142 | 376 |
| Other comprehensive income | ||||||
| Items that may be reclassified to profit or loss in subsequent periods: | ||||||
| Cash flow hedges | ||||||
| Fair value gains/losses in the period | -58 | 46 | -99 | 94 | 124 | -69 |
| Transfers to income statement | -29 | -13 | -77 | -40 | -48 | -85 |
| Transfers to inventory/fixed assets | -1 | -2 | -8 | -5 | -6 | -9 |
| Deferred taxes | 19 | -7 | 39 | -11 | -14 | 36 |
| Net investment hedges | ||||||
| Fair value gains/losses in the period | 25 | 36 | 34 | -12 | -8 | 38 |
| Deferred taxes | -5 | -8 | -7 | 2 | 2 | -7 |
| Exchange differences on translating foreign operations | -50 | -536 | 78 | -104 | -191 | -9 |
| Share of other comprehensive income of associates and joint | ||||||
| ventures | -2 | 0 | -12 | 3 | 3 | -12 |
| Other changes | 0 | 0 | -1 | 3 | 3 | -1 |
| -103 | -484 | -52 | -70 | -135 | -117 | |
| Items that will not be reclassified to profit or loss in subsequent periods: |
||||||
| Actuarial gains/losses on defined benefit plans | -24 | 43 | -23 | 43 | 76 | 10 |
| Actuarial gains/losses on defined benefit plans in associates and joint | ||||||
| ventures | -2 | 3 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 7 |
| -25 | 46 | -16 | 43 | 76 | 17 | |
| Other comprehensive income for the period from continuing | ||||||
| operations, net of deferred taxes | -128 | -438 | -68 | -27 | -59 | -100 |
| Other comprehensive income for the period from discontinued operations, net of deferred taxes |
- | - | - | 0 | 0 | - |
| Total comprehensive income for the period | -159 | -1,096 | 290 | 4,096 | 4,082 | 276 |
| Total comprehensive income attributable to | ||||||
| Owners of the parent | -159 | -1,086 | 281 | 4,097 | 4,081 | 265 |
| Non-controlling interests | 0 | -10 | 9 | -1 | 1 | 11 |
| -159 | -1,096 | 290 | 4,096 | 4,082 | 276 |
| Sept 30 | Sept 30 | Dec 31 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EUR million | Note | 2016 | 2015 | 2015 |
| ASSETS | ||||
| Non-current assets | ||||
| 432 | ||||
| Intangible assets | 12 | 232 | 222 | |
| Property, plant and equipment | 13 | 9,563 | 8,764 | 8,710 |
| Participations in associates and joint ventures | 4, 14 | 2,042 | 1,918 | 1,959 |
| Share in State Nuclear Waste Management Fund | 17 | 836 | 798 | 810 |
| Other non-current assets | 105 | 74 | 93 | |
| Deferred tax assets | 66 | 119 | 80 | |
| Derivative financial instruments | 5 | 467 | 515 | 509 |
| Long-term interest-bearing receivables | 15 | 933 | 943 | 773 |
| Total non-current assets | 14,445 | 13,362 | 13,157 | |
| Current assets | ||||
| Inventories | 241 | 258 | 231 | |
| Derivative financial instruments | 5 | 146 | 374 | 355 |
| Short-term interest-bearing receivables | 15 | 423 | 1 | 0 |
| Income tax receivables | 261 | 181 | 124 | |
| Trade and other receivables | 501 | 392 | 698 | |
| Deposits and securities (maturity over three months) | 3,561 | 5,642 | 4,913 | |
| Cash and cash equivalents | 1,762 | 2,390 | 3,289 | |
| Liquid funds | 16 | 5,322 | 8,032 | 8,202 |
| Total current assets | 6,894 | 9,238 | 9,610 | |
| Total assets | 21,338 | 22,599 | 22,767 | |
| EQUITY | ||||
| Equity attributable to owners of the parent | ||||
| Share capital | 3,046 | 3,046 | 3,046 | |
| Share premium | 73 | 73 | 73 | |
| Retained earnings | 9,965 | 10,573 | 10,507 | |
| Other equity components | 16 | 114 | 168 | |
| Total | 13,100 | 13,806 | 13,794 | |
| Non-controlling interests | 78 | 67 | 69 | |
| Total equity | 13,178 | 13,873 | 13,863 | |
| LIABILITIES | ||||
| Non-current liabilities | ||||
| Interest-bearing liabilities | 16 | 4,515 | 5,010 | 4,965 |
| Derivative financial instruments | 5 | 263 | 258 | 290 |
| Deferred tax liabilities | 561 | 546 | 483 | |
| Nuclear provisions | 17 | 836 | 798 | 810 |
| Other provisions | 18 | 117 | 13 | 81 |
| Pension obligations | 95 | 107 | 65 | |
| Other non-current liabilities | 170 | 158 | 168 | |
| Total non-current liabilities | 6,556 | 6,890 | 6,863 | |
| Current liabilities | ||||
| Interest-bearing liabilities | 16 | 670 | 1,086 | 1,042 |
| Derivative financial instruments | 5 | 314 | 123 | 121 |
| Trade and other payables | 621 | 627 | 879 | |
| Total current liabilities | 1,605 | 1,836 | 2,042 | |
| Total liabilities | 8,161 | 8,726 | 8,904 | |
| Total equity and liabilities | 21,338 | 22,599 | 22,767 |
| Share capital |
Share premium |
Retained earnings | Other equity components | Owners of the parent |
Non controlling interests |
Total equity |
||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Retained earnings |
Translation of foreign operations |
Cash flow hedges |
Other OCI items |
OCI items associated companies and joint ventures |
||||||
| EUR million Total equity 31 December 2015 |
3,046 | 73 | 12,663 | -2,156 | 74 | 67 | 27 | 13,794 | 69 | 13,863 |
| Net profit for the period | 352 | 352 | 6 | 357 | ||||||
| Translation differences | 80 | -3 | 1 | -3 | 75 | 4 | 78 | |||
| Other comprehensive income | 1 | -144 | 3 | -5 | -146 | -146 | ||||
| Total comprehensive income for the period | 353 | 80 | -147 | 3 | -8 | 281 | 9 | 290 | ||
| Cash dividend | -977 | -977 | -977 | |||||||
| Other | 3 | 3 | -1 | 2 | ||||||
| Total equity 30 September 2016 | 3,046 | 73 | 12,041 | -2,076 | -74 | 71 | 19 | 13,100 | 78 | 13,178 |
| Total equity 31 December 2014 | 3,046 | 73 | 9,676 | -1,968 | 19 | -5 | 22 | 10,864 | 71 | 10,935 |
| Net profit for the period | 4,124 | 4,124 | -1 | 4,123 | ||||||
| Translation differences | -104 | 0 | 0 | 0 | -104 | 0 | -104 | |||
| Other comprehensive income | 1 | 38 | 36 | 2 | 78 | 78 | ||||
| Total comprehensive income for the period | 4,125 | -104 | 38 | 36 | 3 | 4,097 | -1 | 4,096 | ||
| Cash dividend | -1,155 | -1,155 | -1,155 | |||||||
| Other | -1 | -1 | -2 | -3 | ||||||
| Total equity 30 September 2015 | 3,046 | 73 | 12,645 | -2,072 | 58 | 31 | 25 | 13,806 | 67 | 13,873 |
| Total equity 31 December 2014 | 3,046 | 73 | 9,676 | -1,968 | 19 | -5 | 22 | 10,864 | 71 | 10,935 |
| Net profit for the period | 4,138 | 4,138 | 4 | 4,142 | ||||||
| Translation differences | -189 | -1 | -1 | 2 | -188 | -3 | -191 | |||
| Other comprehensive income | 0 | 55 | 73 | 3 | 132 | 132 | ||||
| Total comprehensive income for the period | 4,139 | -189 | 54 | 72 | 5 | 4,081 | 1 | 4,082 | ||
| Cash dividend | -1,155 | -1,155 | -1,155 | |||||||
| Other | 3 | 3 | -2 | 1 | ||||||
| Total equity 31 December 2015 | 3,046 | 73 | 12,663 | -2,156 | 74 | 67 | 27 | 13,794 | 69 | 13,863 |
Translation differences impacted equity attributable to owners of the parent company with EUR 75 million during Q1-Q3 2016 (Q1-Q3 2015: - 104). Translation differences are mainly related to RUB and SEK. Part of this translation exposure has been hedged and the foreign currency hedge result amounting to EUR 39 million during Q1-Q3 2016 (Q1-Q3 2015: 2), is included in the other OCI items.
Translation of financial information from subsidiaries in foreign currency is done using average rate for the income statement and end rate for the balance sheet. The exchange rate differences occurring from translation to EUR are booked to equity. For information regarding exchange rates used, see Note 2 Accounting policies.
The impact on equity attributable to owners of the parent from fair valuation of cash flow hedges, EUR -147 million during Q1-Q3 2016 (Q1-Q3 2015: 38), mainly relates to cash flow hedges hedging electricity price for future transactions, where hedge accounting is applied. When electricity price is lower/higher than the hedging price, the impact on equity is positive/negative.
A dividend for 2015 was decided in the Annual General Meeting on 5 April 2016. See Note 11 Dividend per share.
| Last | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1-Q3 | Q1-Q3 | twelve | ||||
| EUR million | Q3 2016 | Q3 2015 | 2016 | 2015 | 2015 | months |
| Cash flow from operating activities | ||||||
| Profit for the period from continuing operations | -31 | -659 | 357 | -246 | -228 | 375 |
| Adjustments: | ||||||
| Income tax expenses | -9 | -160 | 54 | -80 | -78 | 56 |
| Finance costs - net | 44 | 42 | 135 | 123 | 175 | 187 |
| Share of profit of associates and joint ventures | -11 | 95 | -116 | 15 | -20 | -151 |
| Depreciation and amortisation | 93 | 83 | 264 | 254 | 346 | 356 |
| Operating profit before depreciations (EBITDA) | 87 | -599 | 694 | 66 | 196 | 824 |
| Items affecting comparability | 65 | 761 | 25 | 752 | 958 | 231 |
| Net release of CSA provision | 0 | 0 | -2 | -32 | -52 | -22 |
| Comparable EBITDA | 151 | 163 | 717 | 787 | 1,102 | 1,032 |
| Non-cash flow items | -27 | 1 | -61 | -17 | -15 | -59 |
| Transaction costs paid | -12 | 0 | -12 | 0 | 0 | -12 |
| Interest received | 8 | 10 | 31 | 38 | 52 | 45 |
| Interest paid | -20 | -34 | -187 | -230 | -263 | -220 |
| Dividends received | 4 | 3 | 54 | 52 | 52 | 54 |
| Realised foreign exchange gains and losses | -16 | 46 | 112 | 249 | 292 | 155 |
| Other financial items | -3 | 10 | -5 | 33 | 43 | 5 |
| Income taxes paid | -11 | -38 | -211 | -75 | -65 | -201 |
| Funds from operations | 74 | 161 | 437 | 836 | 1,199 | 800 |
| Change in working capital | 26 | -10 | 34 | 60 | 29 | 3 |
| Net cash from operating activities, continuing operations | 101 | 151 | 471 | 896 | 1,228 | 803 |
| Net cash from operating activities, discontinued operations | - | - | - | 154 | 154 | - |
| Total net cash from operating activities | 101 | 151 | 471 | 1,050 | 1,381 | 802 |
| Cash flow from investing activities | ||||||
| Capital expenditures | -124 | -138 | -367 | -347 | -527 | -547 |
| Acquisitions of shares | -553 | -1 | -666 | -6 | -43 | -703 |
| Proceeds from sales of fixed assets | 1 | 16 | 7 | 26 | 28 | 9 |
| Divestments of shares | 0 | 0 | 39 | 27 | 27 | 39 |
| Shareholder loans to associated companies and joint ventures | -6 | 53 | -74 | 301 | 481 | 106 |
| Change in other interest-bearing receivables | -117 | 0 | -378 | -1 | -1 | -378 |
| Net cash used in investing activities, continuing operations | -798 | -69 | -1,439 | 0 | -35 | -1,474 |
| Net cash from investing activities, discontinued operations | - | - | - | 6,303 | 6,303 | - |
| Total net cash from investing activities | -798 | -69 | -1,439 | 6,303 | 6,268 | -1,474 |
| Cash flow before financing activities | -697 | 82 | -968 | 7,353 | 7,650 | -671 |
| Cash flow from financing activities | ||||||
| Proceeds from long-term liabilities | 0 | 1 | 27 | 38 | 37 | 26 |
| Payments of long-term liabilities | -90 | -717 | -899 | -881 | -956 | -974 |
| Change in short-term liabilities | -35 | 74 | -63 | -38 | -84 | -109 |
| Dividends paid to the owners of the parent | 0 | 0 | -977 | -1,155 | -1,155 | -977 |
| Other financing items | -2 | 0 | -8 | 0 | -2 | -10 |
| Net cash used in financing activities, continuing operations | -127 | -641 | -1,919 | -2,035 | -2,160 | -2,044 |
| Net cash used in financing activities, discontinued operations | - | - | - | 0 | 0 | - |
| Total net cash used in financing activities | -127 | -641 | -1,919 | -2,035 | -2,160 | -2,044 |
| Total net increase(+)/decrease(-) in liquid funds | -825 | -560 | -2,887 | 5,318 | 5,490 | -2,715 |
| Liquid funds at the beginning of the period | 6,150 | 8,612 | 8,202 | 2,766 | 2,766 | 8,032 |
| Foreign exchange differences in liquid funds | -2 | -20 | 8 | -52 | -54 | 6 |
| Liquid funds at the end of the period | 5,322 | 8,032 | 5,322 | 8,032 | 8,202 | 5,322 |
Realised foreign exchange gains and losses relate mainly to financing of Fortum's Russian and Swedish subsidiaries and the fact that the Group's main external financing currency is EUR. The foreign exchange gains and losses arise from rollover of foreign exchange contracts hedging these internal loans as major part of the forwards are entered into with short maturities i.e. less than twelve months.
| Last | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1-Q3 | Q1-Q3 | twelve | ||||
| EUR million | Q3 2016 | Q3 2015 | 2016 | 2015 | 2015 | months |
| Change in interest-free receivables, decrease(+)/increase(-) | 35 | 24 | 269 | 199 | -121 | -51 |
| Change in inventories, decrease(+)/increase(-) | 7 | 8 | 3 | 0 | 24 | 27 |
| Change in interest-free liabilities, decrease(-)/increase(+) | -15 | -42 | -239 | -139 | 126 | 26 |
| Total | 26 | -10 | 34 | 60 | 29 | 3 |
| Last | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1-Q3 | Q1-Q3 | twelve | ||||
| EUR million | Q3 2016 | Q3 2015 | 2016 | 2015 | 2015 | months |
| Capital expenditure | 141 | 170 | 356 | 385 | 582 | 553 |
| Change in not yet paid investments, decrease(+)/increase(-) | -14 | -21 | 21 | -3 | -11 | 13 |
| Capitalised borrowing costs | -4 | -11 | -10 | -35 | -44 | -19 |
| Total | 124 | 138 | 367 | 347 | 527 | 547 |
Capital expenditures for intangible assets and property, plant and equipment were in Q1-Q3 2016 EUR 356 million (Q1-Q3 2015: 385). Capital expenditure in cash flow in Q1-Q3 2016 EUR 367 million (Q1-Q3 2015: 347) is including payments related to capital expenditure made in previous year i.e. change in trade payables related to investments EUR 21 million (Q1-Q3 2015: -3) and excluding capitalised borrowing costs EUR -10 million (Q1-Q3 2015: -35), which are presented in interest paid.
Acquisition of shares, net of cash acquired, amounted to EUR 667 million during Q1-Q3 2016 (Q1-Q3 2015: 6) including mainly shares in Ekokem Oyj of EUR 550 million and Grupa DUON S.A of EUR 98 million. For further information see note 8 Acquisitions and disposals.
| Last | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1-Q3 | Q1-Q3 | twelve | ||||
| EUR million | Q3 2016 | Q3 2015 | 2016 | 2015 | 2015 | months |
| Proceeds from sales of subsidiaries, net of cash disposed | 0 | 0 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 6 |
| Proceeds from sales of associates | 0 | 0 | 34 | 27 | 27 | 34 |
| Total | 0 | 0 | 39 | 27 | 27 | 39 |
Gross divestment of shares, EUR 158 million (Q1-Q3 2015: 27), includes not yet received sales price of EUR 121 million (Q1-Q3 2015: 0) relating to divestment of shares in OOO Tobolsk CHP. For further information see Note 15 Interest-bearing receivables.
| Last | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1-Q3 | Q1-Q3 | twelve | ||||
| EUR million | Q3 2016 | Q3 2015 | 2016 | 2015 | 2015 | months |
| Net debt, beginning of the period | -934 | -1,846 | -2,195 | 4,217 | 4,217 | -1,936 |
| Foreign exchange rate differences | -22 | -24 | -70 | 54 | 89 | -35 |
| EBITDA | 87 | -599 | 694 | 4,510 | 4,640 | 824 |
| Paid net financial costs, taxes and adjustments for non-cash and divestment items |
-12 | 759 | -257 | -3,563 | -3,330 | -24 |
| Change in working capital | 26 | -10 | 34 | 103 | 71 | 2 |
| Capital expenditures | -124 | -138 | -367 | -413 | -592 | -546 |
| Acquisitions | -553 | -1 | -666 | -6 | -43 | -703 |
| Divestments | 1 | 17 | 47 | 6,215 | 6,217 | 49 |
| Proceeds from the interest-bearing receivables relating to divestments | 0 | 0 | 0 | 207 | 207 | 0 |
| Shareholder loans to associated companies | -6 | 53 | -74 | 301 | 481 | 106 |
| Change in other interest-bearing receivables | -117 | 0 | -378 | -1 | -1 | -378 |
| Dividends | 0 | 0 | -977 | -1,155 | -1,155 | -977 |
| Other financing activities | -2 | 0 | -8 | 0 | -2 | -10 |
| Net cash flow (- increase in net debt) | -699 | 82 | -1,953 | 6,199 | 6,493 | -1,659 |
| Fair value change of bonds, amortised cost valuation, acquired debt and other |
120 | 16 | 176 | -8 | -8 | 176 |
| Net debt, end of the period | -137 | -1,936 | -137 | -1,936 | -2,195 | -137 |
Fortum wants to have a prudent and efficient capital structure which at the same time allows the implementation of its strategy. Maintaining a strong balance sheet and the flexibility of the capital structure is a priority. The Group monitors the capital structure based on Comparable net debt to EBITDA ratio. Net debt is calculated as interest-bearing liabilities minus liquid funds without deducting interest-bearing receivables amounting to EUR 1,356 million (Dec 31 2015: 773). EBITDA is calculated by adding back depreciation and amortisation to operating profit, whereas Comparable EBITDA is calculated by deducting items affecting comparability and the net release of CSA provision from EBITDA. Fortum's comparable net debt to EBITDA target is around 2.5.
| Last | ||
|---|---|---|
| EUR million | twelve months |
2015 |
| Interest-bearing liabilities | 5,185 | 6,007 |
| Less: Liquid funds | 5,322 | 8,202 |
| Net debt | -137 | -2,195 |
| Operating profit | 468 | 4,245 |
| Add: Depreciation and amortisation | 356 | 395 |
| EBITDA | 824 | 4,640 |
| Less: Items affecting comparability | -230 | 3,323 |
| Less: Net release of CSA provision | 21 | 52 |
| Comparable EBITDA | 1,033 | 1,265 |
| Comparable net debt/EBITDA | -0.1 | -1.7 |
Definition of key figures are presented in Note 25.
| Last | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sept 30 | Sept 30 | Dec 31 | twelve | |
| 2016 | 2015 | 2015 | months | |
| Comparable EBITDA total Fortum, EUR million | 717 | 950 | 1,265 | 1,033 |
| Comparable EBITDA continuing operations, EUR million | 717 | 787 | 1,102 | 1,033 |
| Earnings per share total Fortum (basic) EUR | 0.40 | 4.64 | 4.66 | 0.41 |
| Earnings per share continuing operations (basic), EUR | 0.40 | -0.28 | -0.26 | 0.41 |
| Earnings per share discontinued operations (basic), EUR | - | 4.92 | 4.92 | - |
| Capital employed, EUR million | 18,362 | 19,969 | 19,870 | |
| Interest-bearing net debt, EUR million | -137 | -1,936 | -2,195 | |
| Capital expenditure and gross investments in shares total Fortum, EUR million | 1,172 | 435 | 669 | 1,406 |
| Capital expenditure total Fortum, EUR million | 356 | 429 | 626 | 553 |
| Capital expenditure and gross investments in shares continuing operations, EUR million | 1,172 | 391 | 625 | 1,406 |
| Capital expenditure continuing operations, EUR million | 356 | 385 | 582 | 553 |
| Return on capital employed total Fortum, % 1) | 3.9 | 23.5 | 22.7 | 3.2 |
| Return on shareholders' equity total Fortum, % 1) | 3.6 | 34.8 | 33.4 | 2.8 |
| Comparable net debt / EBITDA total Fortum 1) | -0.1 | -1.5 | -1.7 | -0.1 |
| Interest coverage total Fortum | 3.9 | 36.2 | 27.6 | 3.2 |
| Interest coverage including capitalised borrowing costs total Fortum | 3.6 | 27.8 | 21.5 | 2.8 |
| Funds from operations/interest-bearing net debt total Fortum, % 1) | -397.1 | -60.9 | -59.7 | -582.3 |
| Gearing, % | -1 | -14 | -16 | |
| Equity per share, EUR | 14.75 | 15.54 | 15.53 | |
| Equity-to-assets ratio, % | 62 | 61 | 61 | |
| Number of employees continuing operations | 8,185 | 7,942 | 7,835 | |
| Average number of employees continuing operations | 7,959 | 8,053 | 8,009 | |
| Average number of shares, 1 000 shares | 888,367 | 888,367 | 888,367 | |
| Diluted adjusted average number of shares, 1 000 shares | 888,367 | 888,367 | 888,367 | |
| Number of registered shares, 1 000 shares | 888,367 | 888,367 | 888,367 |
1) Quarterly figures are annualised except items affecting comparability.
The condensed interim financial statements have been prepared in accordance with International Accounting Standard (IAS) 34, Interim Financial Reporting, as adopted by the EU. The condensed interim financial report should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements for the year ended 31 December 2015.
The figures in the consolidated interim financial statements have been rounded and consequently the sum of individual figures may deviate from the sum presented. Key figures have been calculated using exact figures.
The same accounting policies and presentation have been followed in these condensed interim financial statements as were applied in the preparation of the consolidated financial statements for the year ended 31 December 2015.
The balance sheet date rate is based on exchange rate published by the European Central Bank for the closing date. The average exchange rate is calculated as an average of each months ending rate from the European Central Bank during the year and ending rate previous year. Key exchange rates for Fortum Group applied in the accounts:
| Average rate | Jan-Sept | Jan-June | Jan-March | Jan-Dec | Jan-Sept | Jan-June | Jan-March |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 | 2016 | 2016 | 2015 | 2015 | 2015 | 2015 | |
| Sweden (SEK) | 9.3673 | 9.2813 | 9.2713 | 9.3414 | 9.3656 | 9.3260 | 9.3534 |
| Norway (NOK) | 9.3614 | 9.4060 | 9.5016 | 8.9953 | 8.8749 | 8.6949 | 8.7883 |
| Poland (PLN) | 4.3570 | 4.3621 | 4.3289 | 4.1909 | 4.1682 | 4.1521 | 4.1796 |
| Russia (RUB) | 75.8412 | 77.2497 | 80.6173 | 69.0427 | 67.6327 | 65.9096 | 70.9755 |
| Balance sheet date rate | Sept 30 | June 30 | March 31 | Dec 31 | Sept 30 | June 30 | March 31 |
| 2016 | 2016 | 2016 | 2015 | 2015 | 2015 | 2015 | |
| Sweden (SEK) | 9.6210 | 9.4242 | 9.2253 | 9.1895 | 9.4083 | 9.2150 | 9.2901 |
| Norway (NOK) | 8.9865 | 9.3008 | 9.4145 | 9.6030 | 9.5245 | 8.7910 | 8.7035 |
| Poland (PLN) | 4.3192 | 4.4362 | 4.2576 | 4.2639 | 4.2448 | 4.1911 | 4.0854 |
| Russia (RUB) | 70.5140 | 71.5200 | 76.3051 | 80.6736 | 73.2416 | 62.3550 | 62.4400 |
The preparation of interim financial statements requires management to make judgements, estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, income and expense. Actual results may differ from these estimates. Provisions for present obligations require management to assess the best estimate of the expenditure needed to settle the present obligation at the end of the reporting period.
In preparing these interim financial statements, the significant judgements made by management applying the Group's accounting policies and the key sources of estimation uncertainty were the same as those that applied to the consolidated financial statements for the year ended 31 December 2015.
Fortum has reorganised its operating structure as of 1 April 2016. The segments as of the second quarter 2016 are: Generation (mainly the former Power and Technology); City Solutions (mainly the former Heat, Electricity Sales and Solutions); Russia, and Other, under which the two development units, M&A and Solar & Wind Development, Technology and New Ventures as well as corporate functions, is reported. Because of the minor financial impact, the comparable segment information for 2015 has not been restated. Updated segment information for the first quarter 2016 according to the new organisation can be found in the separate Quarterly information-excel published in connection with this report.
Fortum's segment information discloses the financial measurements used in financial target setting and forecasting, management's follow up of financial performance and allocation of resources in the group's performance management process. These measurements, such as Comparable operating profit and Comparable return on net assets, have been used consistently since 2005. For definitions please see Note 25 Definition of key figures.
Items affecting comparability are disclosed separately in Fortum's income statement to support the understanding of business performance when comparing results between periods. Items classified as Items affecting comparability include accounting effects from valuation according to IFRS that are not arising from the performance of the business operations. Such items include fair valuation of financial derivatives hedging future cash-flows where hedge accounting is not applied according to IAS 39 and effects from the accounting of Fortum´s part of the Finnish Nuclear Waste Fund where the asset in the balance sheet cannot exceed the related provisions according to IFRIC interpretation 5.
The business performance of the operations cannot be compared from one period to another without adjusting for one-time items relating to capital gains, major impairment related items and transaction costs arising from acquisitions. Therefore such items have also been treated as Items affecting comparability. Until 2015 Fortum has not made adjustments for impairment charges as there had not been major impairment effects in the segments. In 2015 such items were treated as Items affecting comparability as there were material impacts from impairments during the year. From 2016 onwards transaction costs arising from acquisitions are included in capital gains and other within items affecting comparability. According to IFRS 3 (revised) transaction costs are recognised in the income statement, but Fortum has not had such costs after the implementation of the revised standard in 2009.
Due to the seasonal nature of Fortum's operations the comparable operating profits are usually higher for the first and fourth quarter of the year. Columns labelled as "LTM" or "last twelve months" are presenting figures for twelve months preceding the reporting date.
Distribution operations have been classified as discontinued operations from the first quarter interim report 2015 onwards. As Discontinued operations are disclosed on one line, the segment information presented in this note relates to the continuing operations only and thus excludes discontinued operations. That information is presented in Note 7 Discontinued operations.
37(60)
| Quarter | Generation1) | City Solutions1) | Russia | Other | Total | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EUR million | Note Q3 2016 Q3 2015 Q3 2016 Q3 2015 Q3 2016 Q3 2015 Q3 2016 Q3 2015 | Q3 2016 |
Q3 2015 |
||||||||
| Income statement data by segment | |||||||||||
| External sales | 372 | 363 | 239 | 190 | 175 | 154 | 12 | 11 | 797 | 718 | |
| Internal sales | 0 | 14 | -2 | -5 | 0 | 0 | 17 | 17 | 15 | 26 | |
| Netting of Nord Pool transactions 2) | -66 | -57 | |||||||||
| Eliminations 2) | -15 | -26 | |||||||||
| Sales | 371 | 377 | 237 | 185 | 175 | 154 | 29 | 28 | 732 | 661 | |
| Comparable EBITDA | 104 | 131 | 15 | 12 | 43 | 27 | -11 | -7 | 151 | 163 | |
| Net release of CSA provision | 18 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||||||
| Depreciation and amortisation | -27 | -30 | -31 | -25 | -31 | -27 | -4 | -2 | -93 | -83 | |
| Comparable operating profit | 77 | 102 | -16 | -13 | 12 | 0 | -15 | -10 | 58 | 79 | |
| Impairment charges | 6 | 0 | -784 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | -784 |
| Capital gains and other | 8 | 0 | 14 | -11 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | -10 | 14 |
| Changes in fair values of derivatives hedging | |||||||||||
| future cash-flow | -62 | 14 | 6 | -9 | 0 | 1 | -1 | 1 | -57 | 5 | |
| Nuclear fund adjustment | 17 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3 |
| Items affecting comparability | -59 | -753 | -5 | -9 | 0 | 1 | -1 | 1 | -65 | -761 | |
| Operating profit | 18 | -651 | -21 | -22 | 12 | 1 | -16 | -9 | -6 | -682 | |
| Share of profit/loss of associates and joint ventures | 14 | -4 | -106 | -2 | -6 | 7 | 6 | 9 | 11 | 11 | -95 |
| Finance costs - net | -44 | -42 | |||||||||
| Income taxes | 9 | 160 | |||||||||
| Profit for the period | -31 | -659 | |||||||||
| Investments / divestments by segment | |||||||||||
| Gross investments in shares | 2 | 0 | 681 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 683 | 1 | |
| Capital expenditure | 44 | 52 | 35 | 33 | 41 | 84 | 22 | 1 | 141 | 170 | |
| of which capitalised borrowing costs | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 10 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 11 | |
| Gross divestments of shares | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 |
| Year-to-date | Generation1) | City Solutions1) | Russia | Other | Total | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1-Q3 | Q1-Q3 | Q1-Q3 | Q1-Q3 | Q1-Q3 | Q1-Q3 | Q1-Q3 | Q1-Q3 | Q1-Q3 | Q1-Q3 | ||
| EUR million | Note | 2016 | 2015 | 2016 | 2015 | 2016 | 2015 | 2016 | 2015 | 2016 | 2015 |
| Income statement data by segment | |||||||||||
| External sales | 1,202 | 1,217 | 898 | 840 | 606 | 627 | 37 | 27 | 2,744 | 2,711 | |
| Internal sales | 20 | 65 | -4 | -5 | 0 | 0 | 54 | 59 | 69 | 119 | |
| Netting of Nord Pool transactions 2) | -255 | -240 | |||||||||
| Eliminations 2) | -69 | -95 | |||||||||
| Sales | 1,222 | 1,282 | 894 | 835 | 606 | 627 | 91 | 86 | 2,489 | 2,495 | |
| Comparable EBITDA | 410 | 506 | 133 | 129 | 212 | 186 | -38 | -35 | 717 | 787 | |
| Net release of CSA provision | 18 | 2 | 32 | 2 | 32 | ||||||
| Depreciation and amortisation | -80 | -87 | -84 | -73 | -89 | -86 | -11 | -7 | -264 | -254 | |
| Comparable operating profit | 330 | 419 | 49 | 55 | 125 | 132 | -49 | -42 | 455 | 565 | |
| Impairment charges | 6 | 0 | -799 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | -799 |
| Capital gains and other | 8 | 1 | 17 | 1 | 3 | 32 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 36 | 21 |
| Changes in fair values of derivatives hedging | |||||||||||
| future cash-flow | -73 | 22 | 10 | -8 | 0 | 1 | -1 | 1 | -64 | 16 | |
| Nuclear fund adjustment | 17 | 3 | 9 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 9 |
| Items affecting comparability | -69 | -750 | 11 | -5 | 34 | 2 | -1 | 1 | -25 | -752 | |
| Operating profit | 261 | -332 | 60 | 51 | 159 | 134 | -49 | -41 | 430 | -188 | |
| Share of profit/loss of associates and joint ventures | 14 | -9 | -115 | 50 | 34 | 34 | 34 | 42 | 32 | 116 | -15 |
| Finance costs - net | -135 | -123 | |||||||||
| Income taxes | -54 | 80 | |||||||||
| Profit for the period | 357 | -246 | |||||||||
| Investments / divestments by segment | |||||||||||
| Gross investments in shares | 5 | 5 | 803 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 0 | 815 | 6 | |
| Capital expenditure | 119 | 117 | 68 | 66 | 133 | 198 | 36 | 4 | 356 | 385 | |
| of which capitalised borrowing costs | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 8 | 33 | 1 | 0 | 10 | 35 | |
| Gross divestments of shares | 0 | 0 | 34 | 27 | 124 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 158 | 27 |
1) Sales, both internal and external, include effects from realised hedging contracts. Effect on sales can be negative or positive depending on the average contract price and realised spot price.
2) Netting and eliminations include eliminations of internal sales for continuing operations and netting of Nord Pool transactions. Sales and purchases with Nord Pool Spot are netted on Group level on an hourly basis and posted either as revenue or cost depending on if Fortum is a net seller or net buyer during any particular hour.
| Last twelve months | Generation1) | City Solutions1) | Russia | Other | Total | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EUR million | Note | LTM | 2015 | LTM | 2015 | LTM | 2015 | LTM | 2015 | LTM | 2015 |
| Income statement data by segment | |||||||||||
| External sales | 1,624 | 1,639 | 1,258 | 1,200 | 872 | 893 | 49 | 39 | 3,804 | 3,771 | |
| Internal sales | 38 | 83 | -12 | -13 | 0 | 0 | 70 | 75 | 95 | 145 | |
| Netting of Nord Pool transactions 2) | -351 | -336 | |||||||||
| Eliminations 2) | -96 | -122 | |||||||||
| Sales | 1,662 | 1,722 | 1,246 | 1,187 | 872 | 893 | 119 | 114 | 3,453 | 3,459 | |
| Comparable EBITDA | 584 | 680 | 213 | 209 | 293 | 267 | -56 | -53 | 1,032 | 1,102 | |
| Net release of CSA provision | 18 | 22 | 52 | 22 | 52 | ||||||
| Depreciation and amortisation | -111 | -118 | -112 | -101 | -120 | -117 | -14 | -10 | -356 | -346 | |
| Comparable operating profit | 472 | 561 | 102 | 108 | 194 | 201 | -70 | -63 | 698 | 808 | |
| Impairment charges | 6 | -116 | -915 | -3 | -3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | -119 | -918 |
| Capital gains and other | 8 | 2 | 18 | 1 | 3 | 32 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 37 | 22 |
| Changes in fair values of derivatives hedging future cash-flow |
-171 | -76 | 14 | -4 | 0 | 1 | -1 | 1 | -158 | -78 | |
| Nuclear fund adjustment | 17 | 10 | 16 | 10 | 16 | ||||||
| Items affecting comparability | -277 | -958 | 13 | -3 | 34 | 2 | -1 | 1 | -231 | -958 | |
| Operating profit | 197 | -396 | 114 | 105 | 228 | 203 | -70 | -62 | 468 | -150 | |
| Share of profit of associated companies and joint ventures | 14 | -5 | -111 | 75 | 59 | 32 | 32 | 50 | 40 | 151 | 20 |
| Finance costs - net | -187 | -175 | |||||||||
| Income taxes | -56 | 78 | |||||||||
| Profit for the period | 375 | -228 | |||||||||
| Investments / divestments by segment | |||||||||||
| Gross investments in shares | 16 | 16 | 825 | 23 | 0 | 0 | 12 | 4 | 852 | 43 | |
| Capital expenditure | 189 | 187 | 107 | 105 | 220 | 285 | 38 | 6 | 553 | 582 | |
| of which capitalised borrowing costs | 2 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 16 | 41 | 1 | 0 | 19 | 44 | |
| Gross divestments of shares | 0 | 0 | 34 | 27 | 124 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 158 | 27 |
1) Sales, both internal and external, include effects from realised hedging contracts. Effect on sales can be negative or positive depending on the average contract price and realised spot price.
2) Netting and eliminations include eliminations of internal sales for continuing operations and netting of Nord Pool transactions. Sales and purchases with Nord Pool Spot are netted on Group level on an hourly basis and posted either as revenue or cost depending on if Fortum is a net seller or net buyer during any particular hour.
| Generation | City Solutions | Russia | Other | Total | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sept 30 | Sept 30 | Dec 31 | Sept 30 | Sept 30 | Dec 31 | Sept 30 | Sept 30 | Dec 31 | Sept 30 | Sept 30 | Dec 31 | Sept 30 | Sept 30 | Dec 31 | |
| EUR million | 2016 | 2015 | 2015 | 2016 | 2015 | 2015 | 2016 | 2015 | 2015 | 2016 | 2015 | 2015 | 2016 | 2015 | 2015 |
| Non-interest bearing assets | 6,037 | 6,092 6,391 | 2,806 | 1,828 | 1,929 | 2,616 | 2,516 | 2,347 | 235 | 96 | 135 11,694 10,533 10,802 | ||||
| Participations in associated | |||||||||||||||
| companies and joint ventures Eliminations |
731 | 748 | 758 | 536 | 499 | 559 | 394 | 350 | 316 | 382 | 341 | 346 | 2,042 -19 |
1,938 | 1,979 |
| Total segment assets | 6,767 | 6,840 7,150 | 3,342 | 2,328 | 2,488 | 3,009 | 2,866 | 2,663 | 617 | 437 | 481 13,717 12,445 12,738 | -26 | -43 | ||
| Interest-bearing receivables | 1,356 | 944 | 773 | ||||||||||||
| Deferred tax assets | 66 | 119 | 80 | ||||||||||||
| Other assets | 878 | 1,060 | 974 | ||||||||||||
| Liquid funds | 5,322 | 8,032 | 8,202 | ||||||||||||
| Total assets | 21,338 22,599 22,767 | ||||||||||||||
| Segment liabilities | 1,082 | 984 1,219 | 412 | 261 | 306 | 94 | 129 | 102 | 152 | 168 | 222 | 1,739 | 1,542 | 1,849 | |
| Eliminations | -19 | -26 | -43 | ||||||||||||
| Total segment liabilities | 1,721 | 1,516 | 1,806 | ||||||||||||
| Deferred tax liabilities | 561 | 546 | 483 | ||||||||||||
| Other liabilities | 695 | 569 | 608 | ||||||||||||
| Total liabilities included in | |||||||||||||||
| capital employed | 2,976 | 2,630 | 2,898 | ||||||||||||
| Interest-bearing liabilities | 5,185 | 6,096 | 6,007 | ||||||||||||
| Total equity | 13,178 13,873 13,863 | ||||||||||||||
| Total equity and liabilities | 21,338 22,599 22,767 | ||||||||||||||
| Number of employees | 1,024 | 1,358 1,341 | 2,347 | 1,440 | 1,417 | 3,732 | 4,172 | 4,126 | 1,082 | 972 | 951 | 8,185 | 7,942 | 7,835 | |
| Average number of | |||||||||||||||
| employees | 1,088 | 1,403 1,389 | 1,960 | 1,469 | 1,458 | 3,838 | 4,190 | 4,180 | 1,073 | 990 | 983 | 7,959 | 8,053 | 8,009 |
Average number of employees is based on a monthly average for the period in review.
| Generation | City Solutions | Russia | Other | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LTM | Dec 31 | LTM | Dec 31 | LTM | Dec 31 | LTM | Dec 31 | ||
| EUR million | Note | 2015 | 2015 | 2015 | 2015 | ||||
| Comparable operating profit | 472 | 561 | 102 | 108 | 194 | 201 | -70 | -63 | |
| Share of profit of associated companies and joint ventures | 14 | -5 | -111 | 75 | 59 | 32 | 32 | 50 | 40 |
| Adjustment for Share of profit of associated companies and joint ventures | 6 | 21 | 112 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Comparable operating profit including share of profits from associates | |||||||||
| and joint ventures | 489 | 563 | 176 | 167 | 226 | 233 | -20 | -23 | |
| Segment assets at the end of the period | 6,767 | 7,150 | 3,342 | 2,488 | 3,009 | 2,663 | 617 | 481 | |
| Segment liabilities at the end of the period | 1,082 | 1,219 | 412 | 306 | 94 | 102 | 152 | 222 | |
| Comparable net assets 1) | 5,685 | 5,931 | 2,931 | 2,182 | 2,916 | 2,561 | 465 | 258 | |
| Comparable net assets average 1) 2) | 5,828 | 5,945 | 2,326 | 2,124 | 2,748 | 2,831 | 347 | 269 | |
| Comparable return on net assets, % | 8.4 | 9.5 | 7.6 | 7.9 | 8.2 | 8.2 | -5.7 | -8.5 |
1) Since Q1 2016 Fortum is disclosing Comparable net assets instead of Net assets. Net assets disclosed until Q4 2015 are available in the interim reports published earlier and in additional Quarterly information published in connection with this interim report.
2) Average net assets are calculated using the opening balance and end of each quarter values.
The Group has not made any significant changes in policies regarding risk management during the period. Aspects of the Group's financial risk management objectives and policies are consistent with those disclosed in the consolidated financial statements for the year ended 31 December 2015.
Financial instruments that are measured in the balance sheet at fair value are presented according to following fair value measurement hierarchy:
Level 1: quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities;
Level 2: inputs other than quoted prices included within Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly (i.e. as prices) or indirectly (i.e. derived from prices);
Level 3: inputs for the asset or liability that is not based on observable market data (unobservable inputs).
See also accounting policies in the consolidated financial statements 2015, in Note 17 Financial assets and liabilities by fair value hierarchy.
| Level 1 | Level 2 | Netting 2) Level 3 |
Total | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dec | Dec | Dec | Dec | Dec | |||||||||||
| Sept 30 | Sept 30 | 31 | Sept 30 | Sept 30 | 31 | Sept 30 | Sept 30 | 31 | Sept 30 | Sept 30 | 31 | Sept 30 | Sept 30 | 31 | |
| EUR million | 2016 | 2015 | 2015 | 2016 | 2015 | 2015 | 2016 | 2015 | 2015 | 2016 | 2015 | 2015 | 2016 | 2015 | 2015 |
| In non-current assets | |||||||||||||||
| Available for sale financial assets 1) | 0 | 1 | 1 | 49 | 28 | 42 | 49 | 29 | 43 | ||||||
| Derivative financial instruments | |||||||||||||||
| Electricity derivatives | |||||||||||||||
| Hedge accounting | 10 | 37 | 40 | -9 | -8 | -9 | 1 | 29 | 30 | ||||||
| Non-hedge accounting | 1 | 136 | 169 | 175 | -47 | -63 | -70 | 89 | 107 | 105 | |||||
| Interest rate and currency derivatives | |||||||||||||||
| Hedge accounting | 269 | 239 | 254 | 269 | 239 | 254 | |||||||||
| Non-hedge accounting | 106 | 123 | 115 | 106 | 123 | 115 | |||||||||
| Oil and other futures and forward contracts |
|||||||||||||||
| Non-hedge accounting | 13 | 25 | 7 | 1 | -12 | -9 | -2 | 2 | 17 | 5 | |||||
| Total in non-current assets | 13 | 27 | 8 | 522 | 568 | 584 | 49 | 28 | 42 | -68 | -80 | -81 | 516 | 544 | 552 |
| In current assets | |||||||||||||||
| Derivative financial instruments | |||||||||||||||
| Electricity derivatives | |||||||||||||||
| Hedge accounting | 9 | 93 | 117 | -9 | -12 | -16 | 1 | 81 | 101 | ||||||
| Non-hedge accounting | 2 | 1 | 174 | 250 | 251 | -130 | -174 | -196 | 46 | 76 | 55 | ||||
| Interest rate and currency derivatives | |||||||||||||||
| Hedge accounting | 27 | 77 | 67 | 27 | 77 | 67 | |||||||||
| Non-hedge accounting | 10 | 111 | 114 | 10 | 111 | 114 | |||||||||
| Oil and other futures and forward | |||||||||||||||
| contracts Non-hedge accounting |
119 | 52 | 47 | 4 | -62 | -25 | -31 | 61 | 28 | 16 | |||||
| Total in current assets | 121 | 52 | 48 | 224 | 531 | 549 | 0 | 0 | 0 | -201 | -211 | -243 | 146 | 374 | 355 |
| Total | 134 | 79 | 56 | 746 | 1,099 1,133 | 49 | 28 | 42 | -269 | -291 | -324 | 661 | 918 | 907 | |
| Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Netting 2) | Total | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dec | Dec | Dec | Dec | Dec | |||||||||||
| Sept 30 | Sept 30 | 31 | Sept 30 | Sept 30 | 31 | Sept 30 | Sept 30 | 31 | Sept 30 | Sept 30 | 31 | Sept 30 | Sept 30 | 31 | |
| EUR million | 2016 | 2015 | 2015 | 2016 | 2015 | 2015 | 2016 | 2015 | 2015 | 2016 | 2015 | 2015 | 2016 | 2015 | 2015 |
| In non-current liabilities | |||||||||||||||
| Interest-bearing liabilities 3) | 1,302 | 1,268 1,268 | 1,302 | 1,063 1,268 | |||||||||||
| Derivative financial instruments | |||||||||||||||
| Electricity derivatives | |||||||||||||||
| Hedge accounting | 30 | 12 | 13 | -9 | -8 | -9 | 21 | 4 | 4 | ||||||
| Non-hedge accounting | 157 | 158 | 192 | -47 | -64 | -70 | 110 | 95 | 122 | ||||||
| Interest rate and currency derivatives | |||||||||||||||
| Hedge accounting | 72 | 84 | 93 | 72 | 84 | 93 | |||||||||
| Non-hedge accounting | 54 | 57 | 60 | 54 | 57 | 60 | |||||||||
| Oil and other futures and forward contracts |
|||||||||||||||
| Non-hedge accounting | 16 | 27 | 14 | 2 | -12 | -9 | -2 | 5 | 18 | 12 | |||||
| Total in non-current liabilities | 16 | 27 | 14 | 1,617 | 1,579 1,626 | 0 | 0 | 0 | -68 | -81 | -81 | 1,564 | 1,321 1,559 | ||
| In current liabilities | |||||||||||||||
| Derivative financial instruments | |||||||||||||||
| Electricity derivatives | |||||||||||||||
| Hedge accounting | 52 | 14 | 18 | -9 | -12 | -16 | 43 | 1 | 1 | ||||||
| Non-hedge accounting | 2 | 1 | 235 | 213 | 277 | -130 | -174 | -196 | 107 | 40 | 81 | ||||
| Interest rate and currency derivatives | |||||||||||||||
| Hedge accounting | 7 | 7 | 4 | 7 | 7 | 4 | |||||||||
| Non-hedge accounting | 83 | 60 | 28 | 83 | 60 | 28 | |||||||||
| Oil and other futures and forward contracts |
|||||||||||||||
| Non-hedge accounting | 133 | 40 | 37 | 3 | -62 | -25 | -31 | 74 | 15 | 6 | |||||
| Total in current liabilities | 135 | 40 | 38 | 380 | 294 | 327 | 0 | 0 | 0 | -201 | -211 | -243 | 314 | 123 | 121 |
| Total | 151 | 67 | 52 | 1,997 | 1,873 1,953 | 0 | 0 | 0 | -269 | -292 | -324 | 1,878 | 1,444 1,680 |
1) Available for sale financial assets, i.e. shares which are not classified as associated companies or joint ventures, consists mainly of shares in unlisted companies of EUR 49 million (Dec 31 2015: 42), for which the fair value cannot be reliably determined. This includes Fortum's indirect shareholding in Fennovoima of EUR 16 million (Dec 31 2015: 11). These assets are measured at cost less any impairment costs. Available for sale financial assets include listed shares at fair value of EUR 0 million (Dec 31 2015: 1). The cumulative fair value change booked in Fortum's equity was EUR -3 million (Dec 31 2015: -3).
2) Receivables to and liabilities from electricity, oil and other commodity exchanges arising from standard derivative contracts with same delivery period are netted.
3) Fair valued part of bonds when hedge accounting is applied (fair value hedge).
Net fair value amount of interest rate and currency derivatives is EUR 196 million, assets EUR 412 million and liabilities EUR 216 million. Fortum has cash collaterals based on Credit Support Annex agreements with some counterparties. At the end of September 2016 Fortum had received EUR 172 million from Credit Support Annex agreements. The received cash has been booked as short term liability.
Regarding the relevant interest-bearing liabilities, see Note 16 Interest-bearing net debt and Note 21 Pledged assets and contingent liabilities.
There were no impairment charges related to the early closure of Oskarshamn 1 and 2 nuclear units or any other impairment charges during Q1- Q3 2016.
Impairment charges in 2015 in Generation segment, EUR -915 million, consists mainly of the effects from the Swedish nuclear company OKG Aktiebolag (OKG AB) EUR -794 million, dismantling provision for the Finnish coal-fired power plant Inkoo, impairment loss for Fortum's share of the Finnish coal-fired power plant Meri-Pori, as well as EUR -15 million effect of the cancelled Olkiluoto 4 nuclear power project in Finland.
The financial impacts of the decision made in the Extraordinary shareholder's meeting of OKG AB on 14 October 2015 to close early units 1 and 2 in Oskarshamn, Sweden, was recognised in the 2015 third quarter interim report. An additional write-down was recognised based on information received during the fourth quarter. E.ON is the majority owner of OKG and did unilaterally decide on the closing of units.
OKG is a non profit making company and sells produced electricity at production costs to its owners in proportion to the ownership. OKG is funded entirely by its shareholders. Fortum's part of the funding is recognised as long-term interest bearing receivables, which are increased when OKG needs additional funds and decreased when OKG invoices Fortum for the produced electricity.
| OKG's impairment charges in Fortum income statement | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1-Q3 | Q1-Q3 | Last twelve | ||
| EUR million | 2016 | 2015 | 2015 | months |
| Comparable operating profit | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Items affecting comparability - Impairment charges | 0 | -784 | -794 | -10 |
| Operating profit | 0 | -784 | -794 | -10 |
| Share of profit/loss of associates and joint ventures | 0 | -104 | -116 | -12 |
| Profit before income tax | 0 | -888 | -910 | -22 |
| Income tax expenses | 0 | 173 | 175 | 2 |
| Profit for the period from continuing operations | 0 | -715 | -735 | -20 |
| Attributable to: | ||||
| Owners of the parent | 0 | -710 | -729 | -19 |
| Non-controlling interests | 0 | -5 | -5 | 0 |
Earnings per share effect of the closing of Oskarshamn 1 and 2 nuclear units in Sweden was EUR -0.80 per share in Q3/2015 (2015: EUR - 0.82).
Items affecting comparability for 2015 included EUR -566 million which mainly relates to write-down of existing assets in OKG and a provision of EUR -228 million, which relates to additional future costs due to the early closure of units 1 and 2 as well as to future committed investments. These future costs and investments will have an impact on Fortum's net cash when they occur. The total amount of EUR -794 million has been netted against the shareholder loans to OKG. Main part of the netted amount has already been invoiced to Fortum, the remaining part will be invoiced when the costs occur.
Share of profit/loss in associates and joint ventures includes the impairment of IFRS adjustments related to units 1 and 2 for OKG in Fortum's consolidated financial statements, mainly related to write-down of asset retirement obligations and capitalised borrowing costs. These adjustments are recognised net of taxes. The asset retirement obligation represents the future costs for decommissioning of the nuclear power plant. The initial net present value of the provision for decommissioning (at the time of commissioning the nuclear power plant) has been included in the investment cost and is depreciated over the estimated operating time of the nuclear power plant.
Income tax expenses relates to the items affecting comparability.
There were no items classified as Discountinued operations during Q1-Q3 2016.
In June 2015 Fortum completed the divestment of the Swedish distribution business. The Finnish and Norwegian electricity distribution operations were divested in 2014. After the divestment of the Swedish Distribution business Fortum does not have any distribution operations left and therefore, in accordance with IFRS 5 Non-current Assets held for Sale and Discontinued operations, Distribution segment was treated as discontinued operations in Fortum's financial reporting for 2015.
Discontinued operations are disclosed on one line, net of tax, in the face of the income statement. In the cash flow statement the net cash flows attributable to the operating, investing and financing activities of the discontinued operations are disclosed separately.
The following tables summarize the impact of discontinued operations on the comparative year 2015 for total Fortum. For additional financial information on the discontinued operations in 2015, see the consolidated financial statements 2015 and interim report for Q1 2015. For information regarding the divestment of the Swedish distribution operations, see Note 8 Acquisitions and disposals.
| Results of discontinued operations | Last | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1-Q3 | Q1-Q3 | twelve | ||||
| EUR million | Q3 2016 | Q3 2015 | 2016 | 2015 | 2015 | months |
| Sales | - | - | - | 243 | 243 | - |
| Other income | - | - | - | 2 | 2 | - |
| Materials and services | - | - | - | -34 | -34 | - |
| Employee benefits | - | - | - | -14 | -14 | - |
| Depreciation and amortisation | - | - | - | -50 | -50 | - |
| Other expenses | - | - | - | -34 | -34 | - |
| Comparable operating profit | - | - | - | 114 | 114 | - |
| Changes in fair values of derivatives | - | - | - | -1 | -1 | - |
| Capital gains 1) | - | - | - | 4,282 | 4,282 | - |
| Operating profit | - | - | - | 4,395 | 4,395 | - |
| Share of profit/loss of associates and joint ventures | - | - | - | 0 | 0 | - |
| Finance costs - net | - | - | - | -1 | -1 | - |
| Profit before income tax | - | - | - | 4,393 | 4,393 | - |
| Income tax expenses | - | - | - | -24 | -24 | - |
| Profit for the year from discontinued operations attributable to the | ||||||
| owners of the parent | - | - | - | 4,369 | 4,369 | - |
1) Including tax exempt gain on sale of shares of Swedish Distribution.
| Last | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| twelve | |||||
| Q3 2016 | Q3 2015 | 2016 | 2015 | 2015 | months |
| - | |||||
| - | |||||
| - | |||||
| - | |||||
| - | |||||
| - | - | - | - | - | - |
| - - - - - |
- - - - - |
Q1-Q3 - - - - - |
Q1-Q3 163 - 44 6,369 - |
163 - 44 6,369 - |
| Net cash flows from the discontinued operations | Last | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1-Q3 | Q1-Q3 | twelve | ||||
| EUR million | Q3 2016 | Q3 2015 | 2016 | 2015 | 2015 | months |
| Net cash from operating activities | - | - | - | 154 | 154 | - |
| Net cash from investing activities | - | - | - | 6,303 | 6,303 | - |
| Net cash from financing activities | - | - | - | 0 | 0 | - |
| Total net increase in liquid funds | - | - | - | 6,457 | 6,457 | - |
| Q1-Q3 | Q1-Q3 | Last twelve |
||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EUR million | Q3 2016 | Q3 2015 | 2016 | 2015 | 2015 | months |
| Gross investments in shares in subsidiary companies | 681 | 0 | 801 | 1 | 1 | 801 |
| Gross investments in shares in associated companies | 0 | 0 | 10 | 5 | 27 | 32 |
| Gross investments in available for sale financial assets | 3 | 1 | 5 | 1 | 15 | 19 |
| Gross investments in shares, total Fortum | 683 | 1 | 815 | 6 | 43 | 852 |
On 27 May 2016 Fortum signed an agreement with the four biggest owners of the Nordic circular economy company Ekokem Corporation, representing approximately 81% of the shares, to acquire their shareholding in the company. The acquisition was finalised on 31 August 2016. Fortum also made a tender offer valid until end of September to the remaining shareholders at the same price of 165 EUR per share. By the end of September Fortum's total shareholding was 98.2%. Fortum has initiated a redemption process for the remaining shares. The debt and cashfree purchase price for 100% of the company will be approximately EUR 700 million. Transaction costs of approximately EUR 12 million (of which transfer tax EUR 9 million) are recognised in the income statement of Q3/2016 as Items affecting comparability (Capital gains and other).
The redemption process for the remaining shares is ongoing and Ekokem is fully consolidated into Fortum Group from the end of August 2016 based on preliminary information. Fortum is currently preparing the purchase price allocation and will finalise it during next 12 months. Additional disclosures will be published in the fourth quarter interim report. Ekokem has been integrated as a business area into the City Solutions division.
On 8 January 2016, Fortum made a public tender offer in Poland to purchase all shares in Grupa DUON S.A., an electricity and gas sales company listed on the Warsaw Stock Exchange. During the subscription period that ended on 26 February 2016 Fortum received subscriptions from shareholders representing altogether 93.35% shares in the company at the offered price PLN 3.85 per share. The remaining shares were purchased from shareholders under the mandatory squeeze-out procedure at the same price per share. In April Fortum obtained 100% of shares in Grupa DUON S.A. and in June the company was delisted.
This interim report includes the income statement effect of Grupa Duon S.A. group from 1 April 2016 onwards. The consolidated sales for the third quarter included in the City Solutions segment was EUR 42 million and net profit EUR 0 million (Q1-Q3 2016 sales EUR 89 million and net profit EUR 1 million). The purchase price allocation is based on the balance sheet as of 31 March 2016. The initial goodwill in the acquired group is EUR 22 million and represents the future prospects and growth potential. The initial accounting of the acquisition is still preliminary as all valuation effects have not been finalised, in particular regarding potential obligations.
Other acquisitions include the shares of Info24 AB. On 1 April 2016 Fortum acquired 100% of the shares in the Swedish IT company Info24, a company specialised in the development of business solutions within the IoT, Internet of Things.
| Grupa | ||
|---|---|---|
| EUR million | Duon S.A. | Other |
| Consideration | ||
| Purchase consideration | 106 | 3 |
| Fair value of the acquired assets | 86 | 3 |
| Translation difference | 2 | 0 |
| Goodwill | 22 | 0 |
| Grupa Duon S.A. | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Acquired book |
Allocated | Total fair | |
| Fair value of the acquired net identifiable assets | values | fair values | value |
| Cash and cash equivalents | 8 | 8 | |
| Intangible assets | 3 | 27 | 31 |
| Property, plant and equipment | 46 | 7 | 53 |
| Other assets | 37 | 37 | |
| Non-interest bearing liabilities | -16 | -7 | -23 |
| Interest-bearing liabilities | -19 | -19 | |
| Net identifiable assets | 58 | 28 | 86 |
| Non-controlling interests | 1 | 1 | |
| Total | 58 | 28 | 86 |
| Gross investment | |||
| Purchase consideration settled in cash | 106 | ||
| Cash and cash equivalents in acquired subsidiaries | 8 | ||
| Cash outflow in acquisition | 98 | ||
| Interest-bearing debt in acquired subsidiaries | 19 | ||
| Total gross investment in acquired subsidiaries | 117 |
There were no other material acquisitions during 2016.
Fortum has decided to participate in the Fennovoima nuclear power project in Finland with an indirect owning of 6.6% at the commercial date of the power plant, planned to be in operation in 2024. Fortum has in 2015 invested EUR 11 million in Fennovoima, with an indirect ownership of 4.1% at the end of 2015. Participation is carried out through Voimaosakeyhtiö SF. The indirect investment in Fennovoima is classified as Available for sale financial assets.
There were no other material acquisitions during 2015.
| Last | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1-Q3 | Q1-Q3 | twelve | ||||
| EUR million | Q3 2016 | Q3 2015 | 2016 | 2015 | 2015 | months |
| Gross divestments of shares in subsidiary companies 1) 2) | 2 | 0 | 124 | 6,369 | 6,369 | 124 |
| Gross divestments of shares in associated companies | 1 | 0 | 34 | 27 | 27 | 34 |
| Gross divestments of available for sale financial assets | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gross divestments of shares, total Fortum | 3 | 0 | 158 | 6,395 | 6,395 | 158 |
Divestments of shares in subsidiaries - Impact on financial position, total Fortum
| Last | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1-Q3 | Q1-Q3 | twelve | ||||
| EUR million | Q3 2016 | Q3 2015 | 2016 | 2015 | 2015 | months |
| Gross divestments of shares in subsidiary companies 1) 2) | 2 | 0 | 124 | 6,369 | 6,369 | 124 |
| Proceeds from interest-bearing receivables | 0 | 0 | 0 | 207 | 207 | 0 |
| Sales price for the shares (net of cash) | 2 | 0 | 124 | 6,162 | 6,162 | 124 |
| Liquid funds in sold subsidiaries | 0 | 0 | 9 | 12 | 12 | 9 |
| Sales price including liquid funds in sold subsidiaries | 2 | 0 | 133 | 6,174 | 6,174 | 133 |
| Intangible assets and property, plant and equipment | 2 | 0 | 90 | 2,577 | 2,577 | 90 |
| Other non-current and current assets | 0 | 0 | 14 | 120 | 120 | 14 |
| Liquid funds | 0 | 0 | 9 | 12 | 12 | 9 |
| Interest-bearing loans | 0 | 0 | 0 | -207 | -207 | 0 |
| Other liabilities and provisions | 0 | 0 | -13 | -611 | -611 | -13 |
| Net assets divested | 2 | 0 | 100 | 1,891 | 1,891 | 100 |
| Gain on sale | 0 | 0 | 32 | 4,282 | 4,282 | 32 |
1) In 2015 in addition to the proceeds from shares and repayments of interest-bearing debt in sold subsidiary, totaling approximately EUR 6.4 billion, Swedish distribution business paid group contribution liability net of cash amounting to approximately EUR 0.1 billion as a part of the total consideration of the divestment of Swedish distribution business.
2) There were no additional divestments of shares in subsidiaries during Q3 2016. The change during Q3 is due to changes in RUB exchange rates as the sales price of OOO Tobolsk CHP was in Russian rubles.
In March 2016 Fortum concluded the divestment of its 51.4%-shareholding in the Estonian natural gas import, sales and distribution company AS Eesti Gaas. Fortum sold its shareholding to Trilini Energy OÜ. The sale resulted in a one-time pre-tax sales gain in City Solutions segment totalling EUR 11 million (corresponding to approximately EUR 0.01 per share) in the first quarter 2016 results.
Fortum sold its 100% shareholding in its Russian subsidiary OOO Tobolsk CHP to SIBUR, Russia's largest integrated gas processing and petrochemicals company in February 2016. OOO Tobolsk CHP owns and operates the combined heat and power (CHP) plant in the city of Tobolsk in Western Siberia. Fortum booked a one-time pre-tax sales gain in Russia segment totalling EUR 32 million (corresponding to approximately EUR 0.03 per share) in its first quarter 2016 results.
There were no other material disposals during 2016.
In March 2015 Fortum signed a binding agreement to sell the Swedish Distribution business to a consortium comprising Swedish national pension funds Första AP-Fonden (12.5%) and Tredje AP-Fonden (20.0%), Swedish mutual insurance and pension savings company Folksam (17.5%) and the international infrastructure investor, Borealis Infrastructure Management Inc. (50%). The divestment was completed on 1 June 2015. The total consideration from the divestment is SEK 60.6 billion on a debt- and cash-free basis corresponding to approximately EUR 6.4 billion. Fortum recognised a one-time sales gain of approximately EUR 4.3 billion corresponding to EUR 4.82 per share. The sales gain was reported as part of the second quarter 2015 results of the discontinued operations. Distribution segment has been presented as discontinued operations since the first quarter of 2015.
In Q1 2015 Fortum sold its 51.4%-shareholding in the associated company AS Võrguteenus Valdus to the Estonian electricity transmission system operator Elering AS.
| Q1-Q3 | Last twelve | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EUR million | Q3 2016 | Q3 2015 Q1-Q3 2016 | 2015 | 2015 | months | |
| Power sales excluding indirect taxes | 566 | 522 | 1,866 | 1,890 | 2,582 | 2,558 |
| Heating sales | 67 | 72 | 410 | 439 | 651 | 622 |
| Other sales | 98 | 68 | 213 | 165 | 226 | 274 |
| Total for continuing operations | 732 | 661 | 2,489 | 2,495 | 3,459 | 3,453 |
Taxes for the period totalled EUR -54 (Q1-Q3 2015: 80) million. The effective income tax rate according to the income statement was 13.1% (Q1-Q3 2015: 24.5%). The comparable effective income tax rate, excluding the impact of the share of profit from associated companies and joint ventures as well as tax exempt capital gains, was 19.0% (Q1-Q3 2015: 25.6%).
In June Fortum paid income taxes in Sweden totalling EUR 126 million regarding ongoing tax disputes. Fortum has also paid taxes in Belgium regarding on-going tax disputes. The appeal processes are ongoing and based on legal analysis and legal opinions the payments are booked as a receivable, EUR 236 (31 Dec 2015: 98) million, included in Income tax receivables. For additional information see Note 22 Legal actions and official proceedings.
A dividend for 2015 of EUR 1.10 per share, amounting to a total of EUR 977 million, was decided in the Annual General Meeting on 5 April 2016. The dividend was paid on 14 April 2016.
A dividend for 2014 of EUR 1.10 per share and an extra dividend of EUR 0.20 per share, amounting to a total of EUR 1,155 million, was decided in the Annual General Meeting on 31 March 2015. The dividend and the extra dividend were paid on 14 April 2015.
| EUR million | Sept 30 2016 |
Sept 30 2015 |
Dec 31 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Opening balance | 222 | 276 | 276 |
| Acquisitions | 202 | 0 | 1 |
| Capital expenditures | 1 | 7 | 8 |
| Changes of emission rights | -5 | -13 | -8 |
| Depreciation and amortisation 1) | -14 | -15 | -22 |
| Divestments | 0 | -30 | -30 |
| Reclassifications | 3 | 7 | 14 |
| Translation differences and other adjustments | 23 | -1 | -16 |
| Closing balance | 432 | 232 | 222 |
| Of which goodwill | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Sept 30 | Sept 30 | Dec 31 | |
| EUR million | 2016 | 2015 | 2015 |
| Goodwill included in opening balance | 152 | 170 | 170 |
| Translation differences | 21 | -2 | -18 |
| Acquisitions 2) | 162 | 0 | 0 |
| Goodwill included in closing balance | 336 | 168 | 152 |
1) 2015 includes depreciations related to discontinued operations (see additional information Note 7 Discontinued operations).
2) See additional information in Note 8 Acquisitions and disposals.
| Sept 30 | Sept 30 | Dec 31 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| EUR million | 2016 | 2015 | 2015 |
| Opening balance | 8,710 | 11,195 | 11,195 |
| Acquisitions | 744 | 1 | 1 |
| Capital expenditures | 355 | 422 | 619 |
| Changes of nuclear asset retirement cost | 4 | 0 | 0 |
| Disposals | -4 | -2 | -6 |
| Depreciation and amortisation 1) | -250 | -288 | -416 |
| Divestments | -90 | -2,527 | -2,533 |
| Reclassifications | -3 | -7 | -14 |
| Translation differences and other adjustments | 98 | -29 | -135 |
| Closing balance | 9,563 | 8,764 | 8,710 |
1) 2015 includes depreciations related to discontinued operations (see additional information Note 7 Discontinued operations) as well as impairment loss recognised in Q4 2015 for Fortum's share of the Finnish coal-fired power plant Meri-Pori.
| Sept 30 | Sept 30 | Dec 31 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| EUR million | 2016 | 2015 | 2015 |
| Opening balance | 1,959 | 2,027 | 2,027 |
| Acquisitions | 9 | 5 | 27 |
| Share of profits of associates and joint ventures 1) | 116 | -15 | 20 |
| Dividend income received | -54 | -52 | -52 |
| OCI items associated companies | -8 | 3 | 5 |
| Divestments | -22 | -23 | -26 |
| Translation differences and other adjustments | 42 | -26 | -41 |
| Closing balance | 2,042 | 1,918 | 1,959 |
1) In September 2015 including impairment charges of EUR -104 million (Dec 31 2015: -116).
Fortum's share of profit from associates and joint ventures in Q3 2016 was EUR 11 million (Q3 2015: -95), of which Hafslund represented EUR 10 million (Q3 2015: 10), Territorial Generating Company (TGC-1) EUR 7 million (Q3 2015: 6) and Fortum Värme EUR -4 million (Q3 2015: -8). Share of profits from associates and joint ventures in Q3 2015 included impairment charges of EUR -104 million related to the Swedish nuclear associated company OKG AB. For additional information, see Note 6.
According to Fortum Group accounting policies the share of profits from Hafslund and TGC-1 are included in Fortum Group figures based on the previous quarter information since updated interim information is not normally available.
Fortum's share of profit for the period January-September 2016 amounted to EUR 116 million (Q1-Q3 2015: -15), of which Hafslund represented EUR 42 million (Q1-Q3 2015: 31), TGC-1 EUR 34 million (Q1-Q3 2015: 34), and Fortum Värme EUR 40 million (Q1-Q3 2015: 23). Share of profits from associates and joint ventures in Q1-Q3 2015 included impairment charges of EUR -104 million related to the Swedish nuclear associated company OKG AB. For additional information, see Note 6.
During Q1-Q3 2016 Fortum has received EUR 54 million (Q1-Q3 2015: 52) in dividends from associates of which EUR 22 million (Q1-Q3 2015: 21) was received from Fortum Värme and EUR 21 million (Q1-Q3 2015: 19) from Hafslund.
| Carrying | Fair | Carrying | Fair | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| amount | value | amount | value | |
| Sept 30 | Sept 30 | Dec 31 | Dec 31 | |
| EUR million | 2016 | 2016 | 2015 | 2015 |
| Long-term loan receivables from associated companies | 663 | 677 | 601 | 616 |
| Long-term loan receivables from joint ventures | 175 | 200 | 172 | 196 |
| Other long-term interest-bearing receivables | 95 | 95 | 1 | 1 |
| Total long-term interest-bearing receivables | 933 | 972 | 773 | 813 |
| Short-term interest bearing receivables | 423 | 423 | 0 | 0 |
| Total interest-bearing receivables | 1,356 | 1,395 | 773 | 813 |
Long-term loan receivables include receivables from associated companies and joint ventures EUR 838 million (Dec 31 2015: 773). These receivables include EUR 645 million (Dec 31 2015: 582) from Swedish nuclear companies, OKG AB and Forsmarks Kraftgrupp AB, which are mainly funded with shareholder loans, pro rata each shareholder's ownership.
TVO is building Olkiluoto 3, a nuclear power plant, which is funded through external loans, share issues and shareholder loans according to shareholders' agreement between the owners of TVO. At the end of September 2016 Fortum has EUR 120 million (Dec 31 2015: 120) outstanding receivables regarding Olkiluoto 3 and is additionally committed to provide at maximum EUR 75 million.
Interest-bearing receivables includes also EUR 121 million from SIBUR, a Russian gas processing and petrochemicals company regarding divested shares of OOO Tobolsk CHP.
Short-term interest-bearing receivables include EUR 394 million restricted cash mainly given as collateral for commodity exchanges which has increased during 2016 due to new European Market Infrastructure Regulation (EMIR) requiring fully-backed guarantees.
| Net debt | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Sept 30 | Sept 30 | Dec 31 | |
| EUR million | 2016 | 2015 | 2015 |
| Interest-bearing liabilities | 5,185 | 6,096 | 6,007 |
| Liquid funds | 5,322 | 8,032 | 8,202 |
| Net debt | -137 | -1,936 | -2,195 |
Net debt is calculated as interest-bearing liabilities less liquid funds without deducting interest-bearing receivables amounting to EUR 1,356 million (Dec 31 2015: 773). Interest-bearing receivables mainly consist of shareholder loans to partly owned nuclear companies regarded long-term financing. For more information see Note 15 Interest-bearing receivables.
| Interest-bearing debt | Carrying | Fair | Carrying | Fair |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| amount | value | amount | value | |
| Sept 30 | Sept 30 | Dec 31 | Dec 31 | |
| EUR million | 2016 | 2016 | 2015 | 2015 |
| Bonds | 3,346 | 3,631 | 4,094 | 4,375 |
| Loans from financial institutions | 421 | 460 | 490 | 531 |
| Reborrowing from the Finnish State Nuclear Waste Management Fund | 1,094 | 1,147 | 1,074 | 1,132 |
| Other long term interest-bearing debt 1) | 151 | 160 | 145 | 155 |
| Total long term interest-bearing debt 2) | 5,011 | 5,398 | 5,803 | 6,193 |
| Short term interest-bearing debt | 174 | 174 | 204 | 204 |
| Total | 5,185 | 5,572 | 6,007 | 6,397 |
1) Including loans from Finnish pension institutions EUR 63 million (Dec 31 2015: 68) and other loans EUR 88 million (Dec 31 2015: 77). 2) Including current portion of long-term debt EUR 496 million (Dec 31 2015: 838).
The reborrowing from the Finnish State Nuclear Waste Management Fund includes the part relating to Loviisa nuclear power plant as well as borrowing done through TVO.
During the first quarter 2016 Fortum increased the amount of reborrowing from the Finnish State Nuclear Waste Management Fund and TVO by EUR 20 million to EUR 1,094 million. During the second quarter Fortum Corparation signed a new EUR 1,750 million syndicated Multicurrency Revolving Facility Agreement at the same time as the previous facility from year 2011 was cancelled. The new commited back-up facility can be used for general corporate purposes with initial maturity of five years and Fortum may request two one-year extension options. In June Fortum repaid a EUR 750 million bond. There have been no major changes in third quarter.
At the end of September 2016, the amount of short term financing included 172 million (Dec 31 2015: 202) from Credit Support Annex agreements. The interest-bearing debt decreased during the third quarter by EUR 31 million from EUR 5,216 million to EUR 5,185 million.
The average interest rate for the portfolio consisting mainly of EUR and SEK loans was 2.0% at the balance sheet date (Dec 31 2015: 2.6%). Part of the external loans, EUR 734 million (Dec 31 2015: 641) have been swapped to RUB and the average interest cost for these loans including cost for hedging the RUB was 11.7% at the balance sheet date (Dec 31 2015: 12.8%). The average interest rate on total loans and derivatives at the balance sheet date was 3.4% (Dec 31 2015: 3.7%).
| Maturity of interest-bearing liabilities | |
|---|---|
| Sept 30 | |
| EUR million | 2016 |
| 2016 1) | 210 |
| 2017 | 498 |
| 2018 | 576 |
| 2019 | 803 |
| 2020 | 69 |
| 2021 and later | 3,029 |
| Total | 5,185 |
1) The cash received as collateral based on Credit Support Annex agreements, amounting to EUR 172 million, has been booked as short-term liability.
| Liquid funds | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Sept 30 | Sept 30 | Dec 31 | |
| EUR million | 2016 | 2015 | 2015 |
| Deposits and securities with maturity more than 3 months | 3,561 | 5,642 | 4,913 |
| Cash and cash equivalents | 1,762 | 2,390 | 3,289 |
| Total | 5,322 | 8,032 | 8,202 |
Total liquid funds decreased by EUR 828 million from EUR 6,150 million to EUR 5,322 million during the third quarter.
Liquid funds consist of deposits and cash in bank accounts amounting to EUR 4,627 million and commercial papers EUR 695 million. Deposits and securities include fixed term deposits and commercial papers with maturity more than three months but less than twelve months. The average interest rate on deposits and securities excluding Russian deposits on 30 September 2016 was 0.01% (Dec 31 2015: 0.1%). Liquid funds held by OAO Fortum amounted to EUR 110 million (Dec 31 2015: 76) and the average interest rate for this portfolio was 8.5% at the balance sheet date.
Liquid funds totaling EUR 4,819 million (Dec 31 2015: 7,521) are placed with counterparties that have an investment credit rating. In addition, EUR 503 million (Dec 31 2015: 628) have been placed with counterparties separately reviewed and approved by the Group's credit control department.
Fortum owns Loviisa nuclear power plant in Finland. In Fortum's consolidated balance sheet, Share in the State Nuclear Waste Management Fund and the Nuclear provisions relate to Loviisa nuclear power plant.
Fortum also has minority interests in nuclear power companies, i.e. Teollisuuden Voima Oyj (TVO) in Finland and OKG Aktiebolag (OKG) and Forsmarks Kraftgrupp AB (Forsmark) in Sweden. The minority shareholdings are classified as associated companies and joint ventures and are consolidated with equity method. Both the Finnish and the Swedish companies are non-profit making, i.e. electricity production is invoiced to the owners at cost including depreciations, interest costs and production taxes accounted for according to local GAAP.
Both in Finland and in Sweden nuclear operators are legally obligated for the decommissioning of the plants and the disposal of spent fuel (nuclear waste management). In both countries the nuclear operators are obligated to secure the funding of nuclear waste management by paying to government operated nuclear waste funds. The nuclear operators also have to give securities to guarantee that sufficient funds exist to cover future expenses of decommissioning of the power plant and disposal of spent fuel.
| Sept 30 | Sept 30 | Dec 31 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| EUR million | 2016 | 2015 | 2015 |
| Carrying values in the balance sheet | |||
| Nuclear provisions | 836 | 798 | 810 |
| Fortum's share of the State Nuclear Waste Management Fund | 836 | 798 | 810 |
| Legal liability and actual share of the State Nuclear Waste Management Fund | |||
| Liability for nuclear waste management according to the Nuclear Energy Act | 1,094 | 1,084 | 1,094 |
| Funding obligation target | 1,094 | 1,074 | 1,094 |
| Fortum's share of the State Nuclear Waste Management Fund | 1,094 | 1,074 | 1,083 |
| Share of the fund not recognised in the balance sheet | 258 | 276 | 273 |
The legal liability on 30 September 2016, decided by the Ministry of Employment and Economy in December 2015, was EUR 1,094 million.
The legal liability is based on a cost estimate, which is done every year, and a technical plan, which is made every third year. The cost estimates relating to the new nuclear waste management technical plan were completed in Q2 2016. Following the update of the technical plan, the legal liability is currently estimated to increase by approximately EUR 50 million due to updated cost estimates related to interim and final storage of spent fuel. The new technical plan will be decided by the Ministry of Employment and Economy by the end of year 2016. The legal liability is determined by assuming that the decommissioning would start at the beginning of the year following the assessment year.
According to Nuclear Energy Act, Fortum is obligated to contribute funds in full to the State Nuclear Waste Management Fund to cover the legal liability. Fortum contributes funds to the Finnish State Nuclear Waste Management Fund based on the yearly funding obligation target decided by the governmental authorities in December in connection with the decision of size of the legal liability. The current funding obligation target decided in December 2015 is EUR 1,094 million.
Nuclear provisions include the provision for decommissioning and the provision for disposal of spent fuel. The carrying value of the nuclear provisions, calculated according to IAS 37, increased by EUR 26 million compared to 31 December 2015, totalling EUR 836 million on 30 September 2016. The effects from the new technical plan were included in the Q2/2016 Comparable operating profit. The provisions are based on the same cash flows for future costs as the legal liability according to the new technical plan, but based on the estimated future timing of the expenditures. The main reason for the difference between the carrying value of the provision and the legal liability is the fact that the legal liability is not discounted to net present value.
The carrying value of the Fund in the balance sheet cannot exceed the carrying value of the nuclear provisions according to IFRIC Interpretation 5. The Fund is from an IFRS perspective overfunded with EUR 258 million, since Fortum's share of the Fund on 30 September 2016 was EUR 1,094 million and the carrying value in the balance sheet was EUR 836 million.
Fortum's share of the Finnish Nuclear Waste Management Fund in Fortum's balance sheet can at maximum be equal to the amount of the provisions according to IFRS. As long as the Fund is overfunded from an IFRS perspective, the operating profit is adjusted positively if the provisions increase more than the Fund and negatively if actual value of the fund increases more than the provisions. This accounting effect is not included in Comparable operating profit in Fortum financial reporting, see Note 4 Segment information.
Participants in the Finnish State Nuclear Waste Management Fund are allowed to borrow from the fund according to certain rules. Fortum uses the right to borrow back and has pledged shares in Kemijoki Oy as security for the loans. The loans are renewed yearly. (See Note 16 Interest-bearing net debt and Note 21 Pledged assets and contingent liabilities).
OKG, Forsmark and TVO are non-profit making companies, i.e. electricity production is invoiced to the owners at cost including depreciations, interest costs and production taxes. Invoiced cost is accounted according to local GAAP. In addition to the invoiced electricity production cost, Fortum makes IFRS adjustments to comply with Fortum's accounting principles. These adjustments include also Fortum's share of the companies' nuclear waste funds and nuclear provisions.
The tables below present the 100% figures relating to nuclear funds and provisions for the companies as well as Fortum's net share.
| TVO's total nuclear related assets and liabilities (100%) | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Sept 30 | Sept 30 | Dec 31 | |
| EUR million | 2016 | 2015 | 2015 |
| Carrying values in TVO's balance sheet | |||
| Nuclear provisions | 962 | 954 | 971 |
| Share of the State Nuclear Waste Management Fund | 962 | 954 | 971 |
| of which Fortum's net share consolidated with equity method | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| TVO's legal liability and actual share of the State Nuclear Waste Management Fund | |||
| Liability for nuclear waste management according to the Nuclear Energy Act | 1,369 | 1,349 | 1,369 |
| Share of the State Nuclear Waste Management Fund | 1,369 | 1,345 | 1,358 |
| Share of the fund not recognised in the balance sheet | 407 | 391 | 387 |
TVO's legal liability and contribution to the fund are based on same principles as described above for Loviisa nuclear power plant.
TVO's share of the Finnish State Nuclear Waste Management Fund is from an IFRS perspective overfunded with EUR 407 million (of which Fortum's share EUR 108 million), since TVO's share of the Fund on 30 September 2016 was EUR 1,369 million and the carrying value in the balance sheet was EUR 962 million.
Participants in the Finnish State Nuclear Waste Management Fund are allowed to borrow from the fund according to certain rules. Fortum is using the right to reborrow funds through TVO based on its ownership. See more information in Note 16 Interest-bearing net debt.
| OKG's and Forsmark's total nuclear related assets and liabilities (100%) | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| EUR million | Sept 30 2016 |
Sept 30 2015 |
Dec 31 2015 |
| OKG's and Forsmark's nuclear related assets and liabilities 1) | |||
| Nuclear provisions | 3,125 | 3,207 | 3,210 |
| Share in the State Nuclear Waste Management Fund | 2,976 | 2,859 | 3,025 |
| Net amount | -149 | -348 | -185 |
| of which Fortum's net share consolidated with equity method | -61 | -121 | -71 |
1) Accounted for according to Fortum's accounting principles. The companies' statutory financial statements are not prepared according to IFRS.
In Sweden Svensk Kärnbränslehantering AB (SKB), a company owned by the nuclear operators, takes care of all nuclear waste management related activities on behalf of nuclear operators. SKB receives its funding from the Swedish State Nuclear Waste Management Fund, which in turn is financed by the nuclear operators.
In addition to nuclear waste fees nuclear power companies provide guarantees for any uncovered liability and unexpected events. Fortum's guarantees given on behalf of nuclear associated companies are presented in Note 21 Pledged assets and contingent liabilities.
Nuclear waste fees and guarantees are updated every third year by governmental decision after a proposal from Swedish Radiation Safety Authority (SSM). The proposal is based on cost estimates done by SKB. Currently the fees and guarantees are decided for years 2015-2017. A new technical plan for nuclear waste management has been done in 2016 and will be decided by SKB during 2016. During 2017 SKB will send the propsal of the new technical plan to SSM, after which the Swedish government will decide the waste fees and guarantees for years 2017-2019. Nuclear waste fees are currently based on future costs with the assumed lifetime of 40 years for each unit of a nuclear power plant. In June 2016 the key political parties announced a new framwork regarding energy policy. According to that the lifetime in waste fee calculation would possibily be extended from 40 to 50 years and the regulatory framework for nuclear waste fund will be reformed in order to enhance yield.
| CSA provisions | Other provisions | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EUR million | Sept 30 2016 |
Sept 30 2015 |
Dec 31 2015 |
Sept 30 2016 |
Sept 30 2015 |
Dec 31 2015 |
| Opening balance | 8 | 56 | 56 | 91 | 26 | 26 |
| Acquisitions | 0 | 0 | 0 | 41 | 0 | 0 |
| Increase in the provisions | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 9 | 84 |
| Provisions used | -7 | 0 | 0 | -8 | -12 | -16 |
| Unused provisions reversed | -2 | -31 | -50 | -6 | -1 | -3 |
| Unwinding of discount | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Exchange rate differences | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | -1 | -1 |
| Closing balance | 0 | 27 | 8 | 124 | 22 | 91 |
| Current provisions 1) | 27 | 8 | 7 | 9 | 9 | |
| Non-current provisions | 0 | 0 | 117 | 13 | 81 |
1) Included in trade and other payables in the balance sheet.
Total Other provisions amount to EUR 124 million at the end of Q3 2016 (Dec 31 2015: 98).
Fortum's investment programme in Russia was completed in Q1 2016 when Chelyabinsk GRES 2 unit started its commercial operation and there was no provision for CSA penalties at the end of March 2016. Paid penalties for Chelyabinsk GRES unit 1 and 2 during Q1 2016 amounted to EUR 6 million and the remaining provision of EUR 2 million was reversed to the income statement.
The increase in other provisions during 2015 arises mainly from a dismantling provision for the Finnish coal-fired power plant Inkoo.
| EUR million | Sept 30 2016 |
Sept 30 2015 |
Dec 31 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Due within a year | 16 | 12 | 14 |
| Due after one year and within five years | 32 | 23 | 23 |
| Due after five years | 28 | 25 | 24 |
| Total | 75 | 61 | 60 |
| Sept 30 | Sept 30 | Dec 31 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| EUR million | 2016 | 2015 | 2015 |
| Property, plant and equipment | 490 | 469 | 426 |
| Intangible assets | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Total | 491 | 471 | 428 |
In addition Fortum has committed to provide a maximum of EUR 102 million (Dec 31 2015: 107) to Voimaosakeyhtiö SF, for its participation in the Fennovoima nuclear power project in Finland.
For information regarding commitments related to associated companies and joint ventures, see Note 15 Interest-bearing receivables.
| Sept 30 | Sept 30 | Dec 31 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| EUR million | 2016 | 2015 | 2015 |
| Pledged assets on own behalf | |||
| For debt | |||
| Pledges | 687 | 288 | 294 |
| Real estate mortgages | 137 | 137 | 137 |
| For other commitments | |||
| Real estate mortgages | 99 | 118 | 118 |
| Contingent liabilties on own behalf | |||
| Other contingent liabilities | 174 | 195 | 192 |
| Contingent liabilties on behalf of associated companies and joint ventures | |||
| Guarantees | 599 | 636 | 624 |
Participants in the Finnish State Nuclear Waste Management Fund are allowed to borrow from the Fund. Fortum has pledged shares in Kemijoki Oy as a security. As of 30 September 2016 the value of the pledged shares amounted to EUR 269 million (Dec 31 2015: 269).
Fortum Tartu in Estonia (60% owned by Fortum) has given real estate mortgages for a value of EUR 96 million (Dec 31 2015: 96) as a security for an external loan. Real estate mortgages have also been given for loans from Fortum's pension fund for EUR 41 million (Dec 31 2015: 41).
Pledges also include bank deposits as trading collateral of EUR 351 million (Dec 31 2015: 6) for trading of electricity, gas and CO2 emission allowances in Nasdaq OMX Commodities Europe, Intercontinental Exchange (ICE), European Energy Exchange (EEX) and Polish Power Exchange (TGE) and EUR 25 million (Dec 31 2015: 0) for windfarm construction in Russia.
Regarding the relevant interest-bearing liabilities, see Note 16 Interest-bearing net debt.
Fortum has given real estate mortgages in power plants in Finland, total value of EUR 99 million in September 2016 (Dec 31 2015: 118), as a security to the Finnish State Nuclear Waste Management Fund for the uncovered part of the legal liability and unexpected events relating to future costs for decomissioning and disposal of spent fuel in Loviisa nuclear power plant. According to the Nuclear Energy Act, Fortum is obligated to contribute the funds in full to the State Nuclear Waste Management Fund to cover the legal liability. Any uncovered legal liability relates to periodising of the payments to the fund, see more information in Note 17 Nuclear related assets and liabilities. The size of the securities given is updated yearly in Q2 based on the decisions regarding the legal liabilities and the funding target which take place around year end every year.
Fortum owns the coal condensing power plant Meri-Pori in Finland. Teollisuuden Voima Oyj (TVO) has the contractual right to participate in the plant with 45.45%. Based on the participation agreement Fortum has to give a guarantee to TVO against breach in contract. The amount of the guarantee is set to EUR 125 million (Dec 31 2015: 125).
Guarantees on behalf of associated companies and joint ventures mainly consist of guarantees relating to Fortum's associated nuclear companies (Teollisuuden Voima Oyj, Forsmarks Kraftgrupp AB and OKG AB). Guarantees for the period of 2015-2017 have been given on behalf of Forsmarks Kraftgrupp AB and OKG AB amounting to SEK 5 393 million (EUR 561 million) at 30 september 2016 (Dec 31 2015: EUR 587 million). There are two types of guarantees given on behalf of Forsmark Kraftgrupp AB and OKG AB. The Financing Amount is given to compensate for the current deficit in the Nuclear Waste Fund, assuming that no further nuclear waste fees are paid in. This deficit is calculated as the difference between the expected costs and the funds to cover these costs at the time of the calculation. The Supplementary Amount constitutes a guarantee for deficits that can arise as a result of unplanned events. The Financing Amount given by Fortum on behalf of Forsmark Kraftgrupp AB and OKG AB was SEK 3 843 million (EUR 400 million) and the Supplementary Amount was SEK 1 550 million (EUR 161 million) at 30 September 2016.
The guarantee given on behalf of Teollisuuden Voima Oyj to the Finnish State Nuclear Waste Management Fund amounted to EUR 38 million at 30 September 2016 (Dec 31 2015: 37). The guarantee covers the unpaid legal liability due to periodisation as well as risks for unexpected future costs.
Fortum has minority shares in legal companies owning nuclear power plants in Finland and Sweden. Fortum consolidates these companies according to equity method meaning that Fortum's share of the assets and liabilities are netted to the balance sheet. For information regarding nuclear related assets and liabilities of Loviisa nuclear power plant as well as Swedish and Finnish nuclear production companies where Fortum has a minority shareholding see Note 17 Nuclear related assets and liabilities.
Fortum's 100% owned subsidiary Fortum Heat and Gas Oy has a collective contingent liability with Neste Oyj of the in 2004 demerged Fortum Oil and Gas Oy's liabilities based on the Finnish Companies Act's (734/1978) Chapter 14a Paragraph 6.
Fortum received income tax assessments in Sweden for the years 2009, 2010, 2011 and 2012 in December 2011, December 2012, December 2013 and October 2014, respectively. According to the tax authorities, Fortum would have to pay additional income taxes for the years 2009, 2010, 2011 and 2012 for the reallocation of loans between the Swedish subsidiaries in 2004-2005, as well as additional income taxes for the years 2010, 2011 and 2012 for financing of the acquisition of TGC 10 (current OAO Fortum) in 2008. The claims are based on a change in tax regulation as of 2009. Fortum considered the claims unjustifiable and appealed the decisions.
In April 2016 the Administrative Court in Stockholm, Sweden, announced its decisions relating to the income tax assessments for 2009-2012. A part of the decisions were positive. The Court repealed the income assessments relating to the financing of the acquisition of TGC 10 (current OAO Fortum) for the years 2010-2012. However, with respect to the reallocation of the loans between the Swedish subsidiaries in 2004-2005, the Court mainly rejected the appeals of Fortum for the years 2009-2012. Fortum disagrees with the argumentation of the Court in those cases which were ruled in the favor of the Swedish tax authorities. Fortum has therefore in June 2016 filed an appeal to the Court of Appeal in Stockholm in these cases. The decisions of the Administrative Court which were favorable to Fortum have become non-appealable and thus final in July 2016.
In addition Fortum has received income tax assessments in Sweden for the year 2013 in December 2015. The assessments concern the loans given in 2013 by Fortum's Dutch financing company to Fortum's subsidiaries in Sweden. The interest income for these loans was taxed in the Netherlands. The tax authority considers just over a half of the interest relating to each loan as deductible, i.e. deriving from business needs. The rest of the interest is seen as non-deductible. The decision is based on the changes in the Swedish tax regulation in 2013. Fortum considers the claims unjustifiable and has appealed the decisions. The cases are pending before the Administrative Court.
Based on legal analysis supporting legal opinions, no provision has been recognised in this interim report for the above mentioned Swedish tax cases. Fortum's legal view has therefore not changed. If the decisions by the tax authority remain final despite the appeals processes, the impact on net profit would be approximately SEK 389 million (EUR 40 million) for the year 2009, approximately SEK 347 million (EUR 36 million) for the year 2010, approximately SEK 301 million (EUR 31 million) for the year 2011, approximately SEK 69 million (EUR 7 million) for the year 2012 and SEK 273 million (EUR 28 million) for the year 2013. Moreover, for the years 2009-2012 an interest cost would impact the net profit with 69 MSEK (EUR 7 million). The additional taxes and interest for 2009-2012 have already been paid in June 2016, in total 1.175 MSEK (EUR 122 million) and based on the legal opinion booked as a receivable.
Fortum has received income tax assessments in Belgium for the years 2008, 2009, 2010 and 2011. Tax authorities disagree with the tax treatment of Fortum EIF NV. Fortum finds the tax authorities' interpretation not to be based on the local regulation and has appealed the decisions. The court of First instance in Antwerpen rejected Fortum's appeal for the years 2008 and 2009 in June 2014. Fortum found the decision unjustifiable and appealed to the Court of Appeal.
In January 2016 Fortum received a favorable decision from the Court of Appeal in which the Court disagreed with the tax authorities' interpretation and the tax assessment for 2008 was nullified. The tax authorities disagreed with the decision and filed an appeal to Hof van Cassatie (Supreme Court) in March 2016. Fortum appeals concerning 2009-2011 are still pending and Fortum expects the remaining years to follow the final decision for 2008. Based on legal analysis and a supporting legal opinion, no provision has been accounted for in this interim report. The amount of additional tax claimed is approximately EUR 36 million for the year 2008, approximately EUR 27 million for the year 2009, approximately EUR 15 million for the year 2010 and approximately EUR 21 million for the year 2011.The tax has already been paid. If the tax is repaid to Fortum, Fortum will receive a 7% interest on the amount.
In November 2015 Fortum received an income tax assessment from the Belgian tax authorities for the year 2012. The tax authorities disagree with the tax treatment of Fortum Project Finance NV. Fortum finds the tax authorities' interpretation not to be based on the local regulation and has filed an objection against the tax adjustment. In line with treatment of the cases concerning 2008-2011, no provision has been accounted for in this interim report. The amount of additional tax claimed is approximately EUR 15 million for the year 2012. The tax has already been paid.
Fortum received an income tax assessment in Finland for 2007 in December 2013. Tax authorities claim in the transfer pricing audit, that detailed business decisions are done by Fortum Oyj and therefore re-characterize the equity Fortum has injected to its Belgium subsidiary Fortum Project Finance NV not to be equity, but funds to be available for the subsidiary. Tax authorities' view is that the interest income that Fortum Project Finance NV received from its loans should be taxed in Finland, not Belgium. Fortum considered the claims unjustifiable both for legal grounds and interpretation. Fortum appealed the decision.
The Board of Adjustment of the Large Taxpayers' Office approved Fortum's appeal for the year 2007 on 21 August 2014. The Board of Adjustment's decision is in line with the principle adopted in the Supreme Administrative Court's precedent in June 2014, according to which, under transfer pricing rules, the nature of business cannot be re-characterized for tax purposes, but can only adjust the pricing of goods or services. Despite the new precedent, the Tax Recipients' Legal Services Unit within the tax authorities appealed this decision to the Administrative Court in Helsinki. In May 2016 the Administrative Court announced its decision in the case. The court ruled in Fortum's favour and rejected the appeal of the Tax Recipients' Legal Services Unit. The Tax Recipient's Legal Service Unit has appealed the Administrative Court's decision to the Supreme Administrative Court. Prior to decision on the appeal Supreme Administrative Court has to decide whether it will grant a permit for the appeal. There is no clarity if Supreme Administrative Court will grant the permit for the appeal. If an appeal of the Tax Recipients' Legal Services Unit would be successful in Supreme Administrative Court, the impact on net profit would be approximately EUR 136 million for the year 2007. Based on legal analysis and a supporting legal opinion, no provision has been accounted for in this interim report.
In December 2014 Fortum Oyj received a non-taxation decision from the large Taxpayers' office for the years 2008-2011 regarding the activities in the Belgian and Dutch financing companies. The decision was given due to the transfer pricing audit carried out in 2013-2014 and was in line with the Board of Adjustment's decision with respect to Fortum for the year 2007. The Tax Recipients' Legal Services Unit has appealed the decisions in February 2015 and the cases are now pending before the Board of Adjustment of the Large Taxpayers' Office. According to the claim of correction, the non-taxation decision of the Large Taxpayers' office should be reversed and the interest income that Fortum Project Finance NV has received from its loans in 2008-2011 should be taxed in Finland, not in Belgium. If the claim of correction of the Tax Recipients' Legal Services Unit would be successful, the negative impact on net profit would be approximately EUR 140 million for the year 2008, EUR 99 million for the year 2009, EUR 76 million for the year 2010 and EUR 90 million for the year 2011. Moreover, Fortum Oyj would be liable to pay penalty interest. In line with the 2007 case Fortum considers the claims unjustifiable. Based on legal analysis and a supporting legal opinion, no provision has been accounted for in this interim report.
In Finland Fortum is participating in the country's fifth nuclear power plant unit, Olkiluoto 3 (OL3), through the shareholding in Teollisuuden Voima Oyj (TVO) with an approximately 25% share representing some 400 MW in capacity. The civil construction works of the Olkiluoto 3 plant unit have been mainly completed. The installation of the electrical systems, the instrumentation and control system (I&C), and mechanical systems is still in progress. Test runs with the I&C commenced in January 2016. In April TVO submitted to the Ministry of Economic Affairs and Employment (MEAE) an application for an operating licence. The first phase of the turbine plant commissioning is completed. Some of the systems and components will be kept in operation; the rest will be preserved in accordance with a separate plan. According to the schedule updated by the AREVA-Siemens in September 2014, regular electricity production in the unit will commence at the end of 2018.
In December 2008 the OL3 Supplier initiated the International Chamber of Commerce (ICC) arbitration proceedings and submitted a claim concerning the delay and the ensuing costs incurred at the Olkiluoto 3 project. The Supplier's monetary claim, updated in February 2016, is approximately EUR 3.5 billion in total. The sum is based on the supplier's updated analysis of events that occurred through September 2014, with certain claims quantified to 31 December 2014.
In 2012, TVO submitted a counter-claim and defense in the matter. In July 2015, TVO updated its quantification estimate of its costs and losses to amount to approximately EUR 2.6 billion until December 2018, which is the estimated start of the regular electricity production of OL3.
The companies belonging to the Plant Supplier Consortium (AREVA GmbH, AREVA NP SAS and Siemens AG) are jointly and severally liable of the Plant Contract obligations.
The arbitration proceedings may continue for several years and the claimed amounts may change.
In 2016, Areva announced a restructuring of its business including the contemplated state aid connected with the plan. TVO requires that the restructuring respects the completion of the OL3 project within the current schedule and that all liabilities of the plant contract are respected. TVO has sought to obtain more detailed information from Areva on the company's announced restructuring and its impacts on the OL3 project. As TVO has not received such information it has begun legal proceedings at the end of September 2016 before the Commercial Court of Nanterre in France to urgently obtain this information.
In addition to the litigations described above, some Group companies are involved in other routine tax and other disputes incidental to their normal conduct of business. Based on the information currently available, management does not consider the liabilities arising out of such litigations likely to be material to the Group's financial position.
Related parties are described in the annual financial statements as of the year ended 31 December 2015. On 31 August 2016 Fortum finalised the acquisition of Ekokem Corporation with the four biggest owners, representing approximately 81% of the shares. The Finnish State was among the biggest owners with a 34%-shareholding in Ekokem. For more information see Note 8 Acquisitions and disposals. No other material changes have occurred during 2016.
At the year-end 2015 the Finnish State owned 50.76% of the shares in Fortum. There has been no change in the shareholding during 2016.
| EUR million | Q1-Q3 2016 |
Q1-Q3 2015 |
2015 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sales | 57 | 59 | 81 |
| Purchases | 399 | 370 | 509 |
| Interest on loan receivables | 12 | 22 | 27 |
| Other financial income | 0 | 37 | 37 |
| EUR million | Sept 30 2016 |
Sept 30 2015 |
Dec 31 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Long-term interest-bearing loan receivables | 838 | 943 | 773 |
| Trade receivables | 20 | 21 | 11 |
| Other receivables | 18 | 21 | 14 |
| Long-term loan payables | 273 | 318 | 270 |
| Trade payables | 3 | 2 | 9 |
| Other payables | 4 | 3 | 166 |
| 25. Definition of key figures | ||
|---|---|---|
| EBITDA (Earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortisation) |
= | Operating profit + depreciation and amortisation | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Comparable EBITDA | = | EBITDA - items affecting comparability - net release of CSA provision | |
| Items affecting comparability | = | Impairment charges + capital gains and other + changes in fair values of derivatives hedging future cash flow + nuclear fund adjustment |
|
| Comparable operating profit | = | Operating profit - items affecting comparability | |
| Impairment charges | = | Impairment charges and related provisions (mainly dismantling) | |
| Capital gains and other | = | Capital gains, transaction costs from acquisitions and other | |
| Changes in fair values of derivatives hedging future cash flow |
= | Effects from financial derivatives hedging future cash-flows where hedge accounting is not applied according to IAS 39. |
|
| Nuclear fund adjustment | = | Effects from the accounting of Fortum´s part of the Finnish Nuclear Waste Fund where the asset in the balance sheet cannot exceed the related liabilities according to IFRIC interpretation 5. |
|
| Adjustment for Share of profit of associated companies and joint ventures |
= | Adjustment for IAS 39 effects, major sales gains and impairment charges | |
| Funds from operations (FFO) | = | Net cash from operating activities before change in working capital | |
| Capital expenditure | = | Capitalised investments in property, plant and equipment and intangible assets including maintenance, productivity, growth and investments required by legislation including borrowing costs capitalised during the construction period. Maintenance investments expand the lifetime of an existing asset, maintain useage/availability and/or maintains reliability. Productivity investments improve productivity in an existing asset. Growth investments' purpose is to build new assets and/or to increase customer base within existing businesses. Legislation investments are done at certain point of time due to legal requirements. |
|
| Gross investments in shares | = | Investments in subsidiary shares, shares in associated companies and other shares in available for sale financial assets. Investments in subsidiary shares are net of cash and grossed with interest-bearing liabilities in the acquired company. |
|
| Return on shareholders' equity, % | = | Profit for the year Total equity average |
x 100 |
| Return on capital employed, % | = | Profit before taxes + interest and other financial expenses Capital employed average |
x 100 |
| Comparable return on net assets, % | = | Comparable operating profit + share of profit (loss) in associated companies and joint ventures + adjustment for Share of profit of associated companies and joint ventures |
x 100 |
| Comparable net assets average | |||
| Capital employed | = | Total assets - non-interest bearing liabilities - deferred tax liabilities - provisions |
| Comparable net assets | = | Non-interest bearing assets + interest-bearing assets related to the Nuclear Waste Fund - non-interest bearing liabilities - provisions (non-interest bearing assets and liabilities do not include finance related items, tax and deferred tax and assets and liabilities from fair valuations of derivatives used for hedging future cash flows) |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Interest-bearing net debt | = | Interest-bearing liabilities - liquid funds | |
| Gearing, % | = | Interest-bearing net debt Total equity |
x 100 |
| Equity-to-assets ratio, % | = | Total equity including non-controlling interest Total assets |
x 100 |
| Comparable net debt / EBITDA | = | Interest-bearing net debt Comparable EBITDA |
|
| Interest coverage | = | Operating profit Net interest expenses |
|
| Interest coverage including capitalised borrowing costs |
= | Operating profit Net interest expenses - capitalised borrowing costs |
|
| Earnings per share (EPS) | = | Profit for the period - non-controlling interest Average number of shares during the period |
|
| Equity per share | = | Shareholder's equity Number of shares at the end of the period |
|
| Effective income tax rate | = | Income tax expense Profit before income tax |
|
| Comparable effective income tax rate | = | Income tax expense - effects from tax rate changes Profit before income tax decreased by profits from associated companies and joint ventures as well as tax exempt capital gains or losses |
|
| Last twelve months (LTM) | = | Twelve months preceding the reporting date |
| Power consumption | Last | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1-Q3 | Q1-Q3 | twelve | ||||
| TWh | Q3 2016 | Q3 2015 | 2016 | 2015 | 2015 | months |
| Nordic countries | 80 | 81 | 283 | 278 | 381 | 386 |
| Russia | 231 | 225 | 740 | 731 | 1,007 | 1,016 |
| Tyumen | 22 | 22 | 69 | 68 | 93 | 94 |
| Chelyabinsk | 8 | 8 | 25 | 26 | 35 | 35 |
| Russia Urals area | 59 | 59 | 187 | 188 | 258 | 257 |
| Average prices | Last | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1-Q3 | Q1-Q3 | twelve | ||||
| Q3 2016 | Q3 2015 | 2016 | 2015 | 2015 | months | |
| Spot price for power in Nord Pool power exchange, EUR/MWh | 25.2 | 13.3 | 24.4 | 20.7 | 21.0 | 23.8 |
| Spot price for power in Finland, EUR/MWh | 31.6 | 30.1 | 30.8 | 29.3 | 29.7 | 30.7 |
| Spot price for power in Sweden, SE3, Stockholm EUR/MWh | 29.6 | 15.5 | 26.7 | 21.7 | 22.0 | 25.8 |
| Spot price for power in Sweden, SE2, Sundsvall EUR/MWh | 29.5 | 14.7 | 26.4 | 21.0 | 21.2 | 25.1 |
| Spot price for power in European and Urals part of Russia, RUB/MWh 1) | 1,298 | 1,184 | 1,204 | 1,146 | 1,154 | 1,198 |
| Average capacity price, tRUB/MW/month | 433 | 319 | 456 | 346 | 359 | 440 |
| Spot price for power in Germany, EUR/MWh | 28.3 | 32.8 | 26.1 | 31.1 | 31.6 | 27.9 |
| Average regulated gas price in Urals region, RUB/1000 m3 | 3,614 | 3,614 | 3,614 | 3,446 | 3,488 | 3,614 |
| Average capacity price for old capacity, tRUB/MW/month 2) | 130 | 134 | 136 | 146 | 149 | 142 |
| Average capacity price for new capacity, tRUB/MW/month 2) | 724 | 567 | 777 | 620 | 641 | 759 |
| Spot price for power (market price), Urals hub, RUB/MWh 1) | 1,125 | 1,051 | 1,052 | 1,041 | 1,047 | 1,055 |
| CO2 , (ETS EUA), EUR/tonne CO2 |
5 | 8 | 5 | 7 | 8 | 6 |
| Coal (ICE Rotterdam), USD/tonne | 60 | 56 | 51 | 59 | 57 | 51 |
| Oil (Brent Crude), USD/bbl | 47 | 51 | 43 | 57 | 54 | 44 |
1) Excluding capacity tariff.
2) Capacity prices paid only for the capacity available at the time.
| Water reservoirs | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Sept 30 | Sept 30 | Dec 31 | |
| TWh | 2016 | 2015 | 2015 |
| Nordic water reservoirs level | 98 | 110 | 98 |
| Nordic water reservoirs level, long-term average | 101 | 101 | 83 |
| Export/import | Last | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1-Q3 | Q1-Q3 | twelve | ||||
| TWh (+ = import to, - = export from Nordic area) | Q3 2016 | Q3 2015 | 2016 | 2015 | 2015 | months |
| Export / import between Nordic area and Continental Europe + Baltics | -2 | -5 | -8 | -14 | -18 | -12 |
| Export / import between Nordic area and Russia | 1 | 0 | 4 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
| Export / import Nordic area, Total | -1 | -5 | -4 | -11 | -14 | -7 |
| Power market liberalisation in Russia | Last | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1-Q3 | Q1-Q3 | twelve | ||||
| % | Q3 2016 | Q3 2015 | 2016 | 2015 | 2015 | months |
| Share of power sold at the liberalised price | 80% | 81% | 81% | 83% | 83% | 81% |
| Achieved power prices | Last | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1-Q3 | Q1-Q3 | twelve | ||||
| Q3 2016 | Q3 2015 | 2016 | 2015 | 2015 | months | |
| Generation segment's Nordic power price, EUR/MWh | 31.6 | 28.7 | 30.9 | 32.6 | 33.0 | 31.7 |
| Russia segment's power price, RUB/MWh | 1,796 | 1,612 | 1,704 | 1,556 | 1,555 | 1,664 |
| Russia segment's power price, EUR/MWh 1) | 24.6 | 22.3 | 22.5 | 23.0 | 22.5 | 22.1 |
1) Translated using average exchange rate.
| Power generation | Q1-Q3 | Q1-Q3 | Last twelve | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TWh | Q3 2016 | Q3 2015 | 2016 | 2015 | 2015 | months |
| Power generation in the EU | 10.3 | 12.0 | 36.1 | 37.7 | 50.2 | 48.6 |
| Power generation in Russia | 5.5 | 5.1 | 18.6 | 18.2 | 25.7 | 26.1 |
| Total | 15.8 | 17.1 | 54.7 | 55.9 | 75.9 | 74.7 |
| Heat production | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1-Q3 | Q1-Q3 | Last twelve | ||||
| TWh | Q3 2016 | Q3 2015 | 2016 | 2015 | 2015 | months |
| Heat production in the EU | 0.9 | 0.8 | 4.5 | 4.4 | 6.4 | 6.5 |
| Heat production in Russia | 1.5 | 2.9 | 12.8 | 16.8 | 25.8 | 21.8 |
| Total | 2.4 | 3.7 | 17.3 | 21.2 | 32.2 | 28.3 |
| Power generation capacity by segment | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Sept 30 | Sept 30 | Dec 31 | |
| MW | 2016 | 2015 | 2015 |
| Generation 1) | 8,016 | 8,796 | 8,046 |
| City Solutions | 760 | 749 | 743 |
| Russia 2) | 4,440 | 4,667 | 4,903 |
| Other | 45 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 13,261 | 14,211 | 13,692 |
1) Excluding 750 MW mothballed capacity of Inkoo power plant of which preparations for permanent dismantling has started in 2015. Capacities includes unit 1 (205 MW) in Oskarshamn that will be taken out of operation at the end of June 2017.
2) Change compared to 2015 is mainly arising from the divestment of Tobolsk CHP of (665 MW) and commissioning the new unit Chelyabinsk 2 (248 MW).
| Heat production capacity by segment | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Sept 30 | Sept 30 | Dec 31 | |
| MW | 2016 | 2015 | 2015 |
| City Solutions | 3,884 | 3,927 | 3,915 |
| Russia 1) | 9,920 | 12,994 | 12,696 |
| Total | 13,804 | 16,920 | 16,611 |
1) Decrease compared to 2015 is mainly arising from the divestment of Tobolsk CHP (2,585 MW).
| Power generation by source in the Nordic area | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1-Q3 | Q1-Q3 | Last twelve | ||||
| TWh | Q3 2016 | Q3 2015 | 2016 | 2015 | 2015 | months |
| Hydro and wind power | 4.3 | 6.6 | 16.5 | 19.2 | 25.1 | 22.4 |
| Nuclear power | 5.6 | 5.1 | 17.8 | 16.8 | 22.7 | 23.7 |
| Thermal power | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.8 | 0.6 | 1.0 | 1.2 |
| Total | 10.0 | 11.8 | 35.1 | 36.7 | 48.8 | 47.2 |
| Power generation by source in the Nordic area | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1-Q3 | Q1-Q3 | Last twelve | ||||
| % | Q3 2016 | Q3 2015 | 2016 | 2015 | 2015 | months |
| Hydro and wind power | 43 | 57 | 47 | 52 | 51 | 46 |
| Nuclear power | 56 | 43 | 51 | 46 | 47 | 52 |
| Thermal power | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 |
| Total | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 |
| Power sales | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1-Q3 | Q1-Q3 | Last twelve | ||||
| EUR million | Q3 2016 | Q3 2015 | 2016 | 2015 | 2015 | months |
| Power sales in the EU and Norway | 408 | 391 | 1,379 | 1,411 | 1,918 | 1,886 |
| Power sales in Russia | 157 | 131 | 485 | 479 | 661 | 667 |
| Power sales in other countries | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 5 |
| Total | 566 | 522 | 1,866 | 1,890 | 2,582 | 2,558 |
| Heat sales | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1-Q3 | Q1-Q3 | Last twelve | ||||
| EUR million | Q3 2016 | Q3 2015 | 2016 | 2015 | 2015 | months |
| Heat sales in the EU | 50 | 49 | 293 | 293 | 423 | 423 |
| Heat sales in Russia | 17 | 23 | 118 | 147 | 228 | 199 |
| Total | 67 | 72 | 410 | 439 | 651 | 622 |
| Power sales by area | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1-Q3 | Q1-Q3 | Last twelve | ||||
| TWh | Q3 2016 | Q3 2015 | 2016 | 2015 | 2015 | months |
| Finland | 4.9 | 5.1 | 16.9 | 16.5 | 22.3 | 22.7 |
| Sweden | 6.0 | 7.5 | 21.9 | 22.6 | 29.8 | 29.1 |
| Russia | 6.4 | 5.9 | 21.6 | 20.8 | 29.4 | 30.2 |
| Other countries | 0.7 | 0.5 | 2.4 | 2.0 | 2.8 | 3.2 |
| Total | 18.0 | 18.9 | 62.7 | 61.9 | 84.3 | 85.1 |
NordPool transactions are calculated as a net amount of hourly sales and purchases at the Group level.
| Heat sales by area | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1-Q3 | Q1-Q3 | Last twelve | ||||
| TWh | Q3 2016 | Q3 2015 | 2016 | 2015 | 2015 | months |
| Russia | 1.5 | 2.8 | 12.9 | 16.7 | 25.4 | 21.6 |
| Finland | 0.4 | 0.3 | 2.2 | 2.1 | 3.1 | 3.2 |
| Poland | 0.2 | 0.2 | 2.2 | 2.2 | 3.4 | 3.4 |
| Other countries | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.9 | 0.8 | 1.2 | 1.3 |
| Total | 2.2 | 3.5 | 18.3 | 21.9 | 33.2 | 29.6 |
Building tools?
Free accounts include 100 API calls/year for testing.
Have a question? We'll get back to you promptly.