Annual Report • Feb 21, 2018
Annual Report
Open in ViewerOpens in native device viewer
This report consists of the operating and financial review and the consolidated financial statements of Fortum Group, including the parent company financial statements. Other parts of Fortum's reporting entity include CEO letter, corporate governance statement, remuneration statement as well as tax footprint, which are published on Fortum's webpage. Sustainability reporting is an integrated part of Fortum's annual reporting and additional information on sustainability operations can be found on Forum's website in sustainability section.
| Operating and financial review This section includes description of Fortum's financial performance during 2017. Here you will also find a description of the risk management as well as information on sustainability and Fortum share performance. |
Consolidated financial statements Primary statements include Fortum's consolidated income statement, statement of comprehensive income, balance sheet, statement of changes in total equity and cash flow statement. |
Notes The notes to the consolidated financial statements are grouped to six sections based on their nature. Use the note number list on the right side of the notes pages to navigate in the financial statements. |
Notes are grouped to the following sections: 1–2 Basis of preparation These notes describe the basis of preparing the consolidated financial statements and consist of the accounting policies and critical accounting estimates and judgements. 3–4 Risks In the Risks section you will find notes that disclose how Fortum manages financial risks and capital risks. 5–13 Income statement |
|---|---|---|---|
| Key figures 2008–2017 Key figures consist of financial key figures, share key figures and operational key figures for 2008–2017. The financial key figures derive mainly from the primary statements. Segment key figures include information on segments. |
Parent company financial statements Here you can read the parent company financial statements including the primary statements, cash flow and notes to the financial statements. |
Proposal for the use of profit shown on the balance sheet The Board of Directors proposal for the dividend in 2017 is disclosed in this section. |
These notes provide supporting information for the income statement. 14–32 Balance sheet These notes provide supporting information for the balance sheet. 33–36 Off balance sheet items The notes in this section provide information on items that are not included in the balance sheet. 37–40 Group structure and related parties This section includes information on events after balance sheet date, acquisitions and disposals, related party transactions and |
| Auditor's report This section includes the audit report issued by Fortum Oyj's auditor, Deloitte Oy. |
Operational key figures and quarterly financial information Look here for volume related key figures for 2008–2017 and quarterly financial information for the years 2016 and 2017. |
Investor information Here you will find information on Fortum's Annual General Meeting, dividend payment, basic share information as well as details of the financial information available to shareholders in 2018. |
the subsidiaries of Fortum group. The following symbols show which amounts in the notes reconcile to the items in income statement, balance sheet and cash flow statement. IS = Income statement BS = Balance sheet CF = Cash flow |
| Reader's guide 1 | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Operating and financial review | 3 | |
|---|---|---|
| Financial performance and position | 3 | |
| Sustainability 20 | ||
| Risk management 25 | ||
| Fortum share and shareholders 30 | ||
| Consolidated financial statements 33 | ||
| Consolidated income statement 33 | ||
| Consolidated statement of comprehensive income 34 | ||
| Consolidated balance sheet 35 | ||
| Consolidated statement of changes in total equity 36 | ||
| Consolidated cash flow statement | 37 | |
| Notes to the consolidated financial statements 39 | ||
| 1 | Accounting policies 39 | |
| 2 | Critical accounting estimates and judgements 44 | |
| 3 | Financial risk management 44 | |
| 4 | Capital risk management | 51 |
| 5 | Segment reporting 52 | |
| 6 | Items affecting comparability | 57 |
| 7 | Fair value changes of derivatives and | |
| underlying items in income statement 58 | ||
| 8 | Other income and other expenses 58 | |
| 9 | Materials and services 59 | |
| 10 | Employee benefits 59 | |
| 11 | Finance costs - net 64 | |
| 12 | Income tax expense 65 | |
|---|---|---|
| 13 | Earnings and dividend per share 66 | |
| 14 | Financial assets and liabilities by categories | 67 |
| 15 | Financial assets and liabilities by fair value hierarchy | 71 |
| 16 | Intangible assets | 74 |
| 17 | Property, plant and equipment | 77 |
| 18 | Participations in associated companies and joint ventures | 81 |
| 19 | Other non-current assets 85 | |
| 20 | Interest-bearing receivables 86 | |
| 21 | Inventories 86 | |
| 22 | Trade and other receivables | 87 |
| 23 | Liquid funds 88 | |
| 24 | Share capital 88 | |
| 25 | Non-controlling interests89 | |
| 26 | Interest-bearing liabilities 89 | |
| 27 | Income taxes in balance sheet | 91 |
| 28 | Nuclear related assets and liabilities 93 | |
| 29 | Other provisions 96 | |
| 30 | Pension obligations 98 | |
| 31 | Other non-current liabilities 102 | |
| 32 | Trade and other payables 102 | |
| 33 | Lease commitments 102 | |
| 34 | Capital commitments 103 | |
| 35 | Pledged assets and contingent liabilities 103 | |
| 36 | Legal actions and official proceedings 105 | |
| 37 | Events after the balance sheet date | 107 |
| 38 | Acquisitions and disposals | 107 |
| 39 | Related party transactions | 111 |
| 40 | Subsidiaries by segment on 31 December 2017 112 |
| Key figures 2008–2017 114 | |
|---|---|
| Financial key figures | 114 |
| Share key figures | 116 |
| Segment key figures 117 | |
| Definitions of key figures | 123 |
| Parent company financial statements | 125 |
|---|---|
| Income statement | 125 |
| Balance sheet | 125 |
| Cash flow statement | 126 |
| Notes to the parent company financial statements | 127 |
| the balance sheet 134 |
|---|
| Auditor's report 135 |
| Operational key figures 139 |
| Quarterly financial information 142 |
| Investor information 144 |
Strong results and efficient strategy implementation.
| 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Return on capital employed, % | 7.1 | 4.0 | 22.7 |
| Comparable net debt/EBITDA | 0.8 | 0.0 | -1.7 |
1) Key financial ratios are based on total Fortum, including discontinued operations. See Definitions of key figures.
| EUR million | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | Change 17/16 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sales | ||||
| IS Continuing operations | 4,520 | 3,632 | 3,459 | 24% |
| Discontinued operations | - | - | 274 | |
| Total Fortum | 4,520 | 3,632 | 3,702 | 24% |
| Comparable EBITDA | ||||
| IS Continuing operations | 1,275 | 1,015 | 1,102 | 26% |
| Discontinued operations | - | - | 163 | |
| Total Fortum | 1,275 | 1,015 | 1,265 | 26% |
| Comparable operating profit | ||||
| IS Continuing operations | 811 | 644 | 808 | 26% |
| Discontinued operations | - | - | 114 | |
| Total Fortum | 811 | 644 | 922 | 26% |
| Operating Profit | ||||
| IS Continuing operations | 1,158 | 633 | -150 | 83% |
| - of sales % | 25.6 | 17.4 | -4.3 | |
| Discontinued operations | - | - | 4,395 | |
| Total Fortum | 1,158 | 633 | 4,245 | 83% |
| - of sales % | 25.6 | 17.4 | 114.7 | |
| Share of profits from associates and joint ventures |
||||
| IS Continuing operations | 148 | 131 | 20 | 13% |
| Discontinued operations | - | - | 0 | |
| Total Fortum | 148 | 131 | 20 | 13% |
| EUR million | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | Change 17/16 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Profit before income tax | ||||
| IS Continuing operations | 1,111 | 595 | -305 | 87% |
| - of sales % | 24.6 | 16.4 | -8.8 | |
| Discontinued operations | - | - | 4,393 | |
| Total Fortum | 1,111 | 595 | 4,088 | 87% |
| - of sales % | 24.6 | 16.4 | 110.4 | |
| Earnings per share, EUR | ||||
| IS Continuing operations | 0.98 | 0.56 | -0.26 | 75% |
| Discontinued operations | - | - | 4.92 | |
| Total Fortum | 0.98 | 0.56 | 4.66 | 75% |
| CF Net cash from operating activities, | ||||
| continuing operations | 993 | 621 | 1,228 | 60% |
| Shareholders' equity per share, EUR | 14.69 | 15.15 | 15.53 | -3% |
| Interest-bearing net debt | ||||
| (at end of period) * | 988 | -48 | -2,195 | 2,158% |
| Return on shareholders' equity total | ||||
| Fortum, % | 6.6 | 3.7 | 33.4 | |
| Equity-to-assets ratio, % | 61 | 62 | 61 |
* Net cash in 2015 and 2016
We are satisfied with the progress of our strategy implementation during the year. Following the earlier Ekokem and Hafslund transactions, we announced the bid for Uniper towards the end of 2017. By investing in Uniper, Fortum continues the capital redeployment to enable a more efficient use of our balance sheet. The offer period commenced in November. At the end of the initial acceptance period in mid-January 2018, 46.93% of Uniper's shares had been tendered to our offer, including E.ON's 46.65% shareholding. Uniper shareholders who have not yet accepted our offer still have a chance to do so within the additional acceptance period.
Uniper's and Fortum's businesses complement each other well. Together Fortum and Uniper have a good strategic mix of assets – both clean and secure – as well as the expertise required to successfully and affordably drive Europe's transition towards a low-carbon energy system. We aim to take an active role in driving European energy transition. We see plenty of opportunities for co-operation with Uniper to add value for all stakeholders, and we have entered into talks with Uniper to formalise the relationship between our companies after the transaction is finalised. We truly see our investment as a win-win for all involved.
Proposal for the use of the profit shown on the balance sheet Notes information
Financial performance and position Sustainability Risk management Fortum share and shareholders
The Hafslund restructuring was concluded in the fourth quarter and the new business structure is in place. Together with our new colleagues from Hafslund, we have updated the strategies for both our Consumer Solutions and City Solutions divisions. We have now set the path forward and will be working together on implementing the strategy. We target annual synergies of EUR 15–20 million by the end of 2020.
In line with our strategy, we are not only focusing on taking part in the European power sector consolidation, we are also investing in new renewable generation and targeting a gigawattscale portfolio of wind and solar power. In January 2018 we commissioned Russia's first industrial wind power site with a capacity of 35 MW. In addition, we have recently started the implementation of other wind power plants in the Nordics and Russia and invested in solar power in Russia, and commissioned our largest solar power plant in India.
In the fourth quarter our performance improvement was broadbased, with comparable operating profit increasing in all operative segments. The Generation, City Solutions and Russia segments continued to perform well, while the Consumer Solutions segment continues to be under pressure due to the tight competitive situation. The acquisitions of Ekokem and Hafslund are already impacting our results positively, further strengthened by our continued Fortum-wide focus on efficiency. We have now reached the targeted EUR 100 million savings in fixed costs announced in 2016. The cost savings have enabled us to invest in new ventures for the future. Going forward we will continue to focus on cost efficiency and investment prioritisation.
Sustainability and safety continue to be very important for us at Fortum. 2017 was a challenging year in terms of occupational safety. We did not reach our targets for lost workday injury frequency, especially for contractors. This was a clear disappointment, even though we succeeded in reducing the number of severe accidents to only one. We continue to be committed to keeping our promise to provide a safe workplace for all. In 2017, our CO2 emissions decreased slightly. Our specific emissions remained at the same level as the previous year and continue to be at a low level compared to other European power producers.
As the strategy implementation and capital redeployment continues, our dividend payment capability will be further strengthened. Fortum's Board of Directors is proposing an unchanged dividend of EUR 1.10 per share for the calendar year 2017. Our ambition is to pay a stable, sustainable and over time increasing dividend now and in the future, and given the prevailing market conditions, our goal is to avoid a temporary dividend cut.
In September 2017, Fortum announced it had signed a transaction agreement with E.ON under which E.ON had the right to decide to tender its 46.65% shareholding in Uniper SE into Fortum's public takeover offer. In November, Fortum launched a voluntary public takeover offer to all Uniper shareholders at a total value of EUR 22 per share implying a premium of 36% to the price prior to intense market speculation on a potential transaction at the end of May. The offer is subject to competition and regulatory approvals. Already in October 2017, Fortum received approval from the US competition authorities. Fortum expects to finalise the transaction in mid-2018.
The investment in Uniper delivers on Fortum's previously announced capital redeployment strategy and investment criteria. Uniper's businesses are well aligned with Fortum's core competencies, are close to Fortum's home markets and are highly cash generative. Fortum expects the investment to deliver an attractive return that will support the company in accelerating the development and implementation of sustainable energy technologies, without sacrificing a competitive dividend.
The offer will be financed with existing cash resources and committed credit facilities, with Barclays Bank PLC originally underwriting 100% of the credit facilities, including ongoing liquidity requirements. In October the credit facilities were syndicated to selected relationship banks of Fortum. Dividends received from the stake in Uniper will contribute to a stable and sustainable dividend for Fortum's shareholders. Fortum will account for Uniper as an associated company unless control according to IFRS is attained; as such, EBITDA and cash flow contribution, as well as the EPS effect on Fortum's results, will
depend on the final outcome of the offer. As a result of this transaction, Fortum's leverage will rise above our given guidance for net debt/EBITDA level of around 2.5x. Over time however, Fortum expects its cash generation in combination with the dividend from Uniper to reduce this level towards the stated target.
In January 2018, Fortum announced that shareholders representing 46.93% of the shares in Uniper had accepted the offer during the initial acceptance period, including E.ON. Uniper shareholders who have not tendered their shares to the offer within the initial acceptance period can still tender during the additional acceptance period that began on 20 January 2018 and ending on 2 February 2018. Fortum expects to publish the total amount of shares tendered on 7 February 2018.
On 26 April 2017, Fortum and the City of Oslo entered into an agreement to restructure their ownership in Hafslund ASA, one of the largest listed power groups in the Nordic region. On 4 August 2017, Fortum concluded the restructuring of the ownership in Hafslund. Fortum sold its 34.1% stake in Hafslund ASA to the City of Oslo, acquired 100% of Hafslund Markets AS and 50.0% of Hafslund Varme AS (renamed as Fortum Oslo Varme AS) including the City of Oslo's waste-to-energy company Klemetsrudanlegget AS (renamed as Fortum Oslo Varme KEA AS), and 10% of Hafslund Produksjon Holding AS.
The total debt-free price of the acquisitions was EUR 940 million. The combined net cash investment of the transactions, including the dividend received in May 2017, was EUR 230 million. Fortum booked a one-time tax-free sales gain in its 2017 results, totalling EUR 324 million, which corresponds to EUR 0.36 earnings per share. Transaction costs of EUR 4 million for the acquisitions were included in Items affecting comparability. The acquired businesses were consolidated into Fortum Group from 1 August 2017.
As of 1 March 2017, the City Solutions division was divided into two separate divisions: City Solutions and Consumer Solutions, reported as separate segments. City Solutions comprises heating and cooling, waste-to-energy, biomass and other circular economy solutions. Consumer Solutions comprises electricity and gas retail businesses in the Nordics and in Poland, including the customer service, invoicing and collection business. (Nordic customer services previously reported under the Other segment). Comparison figures in accordance with the new organisational structure were published on 11 April 2017.
Following the divestment of the Swedish distribution business, Distribution segment is treated as discontinued operations in 2015. Financial results discussed in this operating and financial review are for the continuing operations of Fortum Group unless otherwise stated.
In addition, as of 2014, presented figures have been rounded and consequently the sum of individual figures may deviate from the sum presented. Figures in brackets refer to the comparison period unless otherwise stated.
Return on capital employed total Fortum, %
Return on capital employed, %
Target %, revised in 2016
Operating profit
Comparable operating profit
| EUR million | 2017 | 2016 Change 17/16 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Generation | 1,677 | 1,657 | 1% |
| City Solutions | 1,015 | 782 | 30% |
| Consumer Solutions | 1,097 | 668 | 64% |
| Russia | 1,101 | 896 | 23% |
| Other | 102 | 92 | 11% |
| Netting of Nord Pool | |||
| transactions 1) | -367 | -384 | |
| Eliminations | -103 | -79 | |
| IS Total | 4,520 | 3,632 | 24% |
1) Sales and purchases with Nord Pool are netted at the Group level on an hourly basis and posted either as revenue or cost depending on whether Fortum is a net seller or net buyer during any particular hour.
| EUR million | 2017 | 2016 Change 17/16 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Generation | 603 | 527 | 14% |
| City Solutions | 262 | 186 | 41% |
| Consumer Solutions | 57 | 55 | 4% |
| Russia | 438 | 312 | 40% |
| Other | -83 | -64 | -30% |
| IS Total | 1,275 | 1,015 | 26% |
| EUR million | 2017 | 2016 Change 17/16 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Generation | 478 | 417 | 15% |
| City Solutions | 98 | 64 | 53% |
| Consumer Solutions | 41 | 48 | -15% |
| Russia | 296 | 191 | 55% |
| Other | -102 | -77 | -32% |
| IS Total | 811 | 644 | 26% |
| EUR million | 2017 | 2016 Change 17/16 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Generation | 501 | 338 | 48% |
| City Solutions | 102 | 86 | 19% |
| Consumer Solutions | 39 | 59 | -34% |
| Russia | 295 | 226 | 31% |
| Other | 221 | -77 | 387% |
| IS Total | 1,158 | 633 | 83% |
For further information see Note 5 Segment reporting.
In 2017, sales were EUR 4,520 (3,632) million. The increase was mainly due to the strengthening Russian rouble and the consolidation of Ekokem, Hafslund and DUON. Comparable EBITDA totalled EUR 1,275 (1,015) million. Comparable operating profit totalled EUR 811 (644) million. Comparable operating profit was positively impacted by the consolidation of Hafslund, higher achieved power prices, lower real estate and capacity taxes in Swedish nuclear and hydro power plants and by improved result in the Russian operations. Operating profit totalled EUR 1,158 (633) million. Fortum's operating profit for the period was impacted by items affecting comparability of EUR 347 (-11) million, including updated provisions, sales gains, transaction costs and the IFRS accounting treatment (IAS 39) of derivatives mainly used for hedging, as well as nuclear fund adjustments ( Note 5). The sales gains include a one-time tax-free sales gain of EUR 324 million from the divestment of the 34.1% stake in Hafslund ASA ( Note 38).
In 2017, Fortum reached the targeted EUR 100 million savings in fixed costs announced in 2016. At the same time, the cost spend has been shifted to businesses under development and new ventures.
The share of profit from associates and joint ventures was EUR 148 (131) million, of which Hafslund represented EUR 39 (51) million, TGC-1 EUR 32 (38) million and Fortum Värme EUR 66 (66) million. The share of profit from Hafslund is based on the company's published fourth-quarter 2016 and January–June 2017 interim reports. The share of profit from TGC-1 is based on the company's published fourth-quarter 2016 and January-September
2017 interim reports ( Note 18). Due to the restructuring of Hafslund and the divestment of Fortum's 34.1% share in the company, Fortum will no longer have share of profits from Hafslund ASA.
Net finance costs amounted to EUR 195 (169) million, including costs relating to financing arrangements for the Uniper transaction.
Profit before income taxes was EUR 1,111 (595) million.
Taxes for the period totalled EUR 229 (90) million. The effective income tax rate according to the income statement was 20.6% (15.2%). The comparable effective income tax rate, excluding the impact of the share of profit from associated companies and joint ventures as well as non-taxable capital gains and other major one-time income tax effects, was 18.8% (20.0%) ( Note 12).
The profit for the period was EUR 882 (504) million. Earnings per share were EUR 0.98 (0.56), of which EUR -0.14 per share was related to a Swedish income tax case and EUR 0.38 (-0.02) per share was related to items affecting comparability ( Note 6 and Note 36).
In 2017, net cash from operating activities increased by EUR 372 million to EUR 993 (621) million, due to a EUR 260 million increase in comparable EBITDA, a EUR 193 million decrease in realised foreign exchange gains and losses, a EUR 133 million decrease in income taxes paid and a EUR 183 decrease in working capital compared to the previous year. The foreign exchange gains and losses of EUR -83 (110) million relate to the rollover of foreign exchange contract hedging loans to Russian and Swedish subsidiaries. In June 2016, Fortum paid income taxes in Sweden totalling EUR 127 million regarding an ongoing tax dispute. The change in working capital in 2017 was EUR 81 (-102) million. The biggest impact was the effect of the daily cash settlements for futures in Nasdaq OMX Commodities Europe
Investments excluding acquisitions increased by EUR 58 million to EUR 657 (599) million compared to the previous year. Acquisition of shares amounted to EUR 972 (695) million mainly
Financial performance and position Sustainability Risk management Fortum share and shareholders
| EUR million | 2017 | 2016 Change 17/16 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Interest expense | -164 | -169 | 3% |
| Interest income | 32 | 30 | 7% |
| Fair value gains and losses on financial instruments |
-12 | -2 | -500% |
| Other financial expenses - net | -50 | -29 | -72% |
| IS Finance costs - net | -195 | -169 | -15% |
| Interest-bearing liabilities | 4,885 | 5,107 | -4% |
| Less: Liquid funds | 3,897 | 5,155 | -24% |
| Interest-bearing net debt | 988 | -48 | 2,158% |
due to the Hafslund transaction in 2017 and the acquisitions of Ekokem and Polish DUON in 2016. Divestment of shares, mainly the Hafslund transaction, amounted to EUR 741 million (39). Net cash used in investing activities decreased to EUR 807 (1,701) million including the increase in cash collaterals of EUR -3 (-359) million given as trading collaterals to commodity exchanges.
Cash flow before financing activities was EUR 187 (-1,080) million, mainly impacted by the Hafslund transaction.
In 2017, Fortum paid dividends totalling EUR 977 (977) million. Payments of long-term liabilities totalled EUR 543 (934) million, including the repayment of bonds of EUR 343 million and other loan repayments of EUR 200 million. The net decrease in liquid funds was EUR 1,241 (3,064) million.
At the end of the reporting period, total assets amounted to EUR 21,753 (21,964) million, a decrease of EUR 211 million. Liquid funds at the end of the period amounted to EUR 3,897 (5,155) million. Capital employed decreased by EUR 477 million and was EUR 18,172 (18,649) million.
Equity attributable to owners of the parent company totalled EUR 13,048 (13,459) million.
The decrease in equity attributable to owners of the parent company was EUR 411 million, mainly due to the net profit for the period of EUR 866 million, translation differences of EUR -369 million and the dividend payment of EUR 977 million.
Net debt increased by EUR 1,036 million to EUR 988 (-48) million.
At the end of the reporting period, the Group's liquid funds totalled EUR 3,897 (5,155) million. Liquid funds include cash and bank deposits held by PAO Fortum amounting to EUR 246 (105) million. In addition to liquid funds, Fortum's undrawn committed credit facilities totalled EUR 1.8 billion ( Note 23), excluding
At the end of 2016 Fortum was in net cash position, see Financial position and cash flow table above.
committed credit facilities of EUR 12.0 billion for Fortum's offer for Uniper shares.
Net financial expenses totalled EUR 195 (169) million, of which net interest expenses were EUR 132 (139) million. Net financial expenses include costs relating to financing arrangements of the Uniper transaction.
In September 2017, Standard & Poor's and Fitch Ratings placed both Fortum's long-term and short-term credit ratings on credit watch negative on possible adverse impacts of the planned Uniper investment. In January 2018, Standard & Poor's downgraded Fortum's long-term credit rating from BBB+ to BBB with a Negative Outlook due to the Uniper investment. The short-term rating was affirmed at level A-2. Fitch Ratings rates Fortum's long-term credit rating at level BBB+ and the short-term rating at level F2.
Interest-bearing net debt, EUR million
Interest-bearing net debt
Interest-bearing net debt without Värme financing
2000 2003 2016 2017 Reference level
Source: Nord Pool
At the end of 2017, the comparable net debt to EBITDA ratio was 0.8 (0.0).
Gearing was 7% (0%) and the equity-to-assets ratio 61% (62%). Equity per share was EUR 14.69 (15.15). Return on capital employed improved to 7.1% (4.0%). Fortum targets a long-term Return on capital employed of at least 10%.
According to preliminary statistics, electricity consumption in the Nordic countries was 392 (390) terawatt-hours (TWh) in 2017.
At the beginning of 2017, the Nordic water reservoirs were at 75 TWh, which is 8 TWh below the long-term average and 23 TWh lower compared to the previous year. At the end of 2017, the reservoirs were 86 TWh, which is 3 TWh above the longterm average and 11 TWh higher compared to the previous year. Precipitation in the Nordics, was clearly above the normal level both in the fourth quarter and during the full year 2017.
The average system spot price in Nord Pool for the year 2017 was EUR 29.4 (26.9) per MWh, and the average area price in Finland was EUR 33.2 (32.4) per MWh and EUR 31.2 (29.2) per MWh in Sweden
(SE3, Stockholm). The main driver for the price increase was the clearly higher marginal cost of coal condensing power, which has contributed to stronger continental prices and increased exports from the Nordics.
In Germany, the average spot price in 2017 increased to EUR 34.2 (29.0) per MWh.
The market price of CO2 emission allowances (EUA) increased from EUR 6.5 per tonne at the beginning of the year to EUR 8.2 per tonne at the end of 2017.
Fortum operates both in the Tyumen and Khanty-Mansiysk area of Western Siberia, where industrial production is dominated by the oil and gas industries, and in the Chelyabinsk area of the Urals, which is dominated by the metal industry. The Russian market is divided in two price zones and Fortum operates in the First Price Zone.
Russian electricity consumption in 2017 was 1,035 (1,027) TWh and the corresponding figure for the First Price Zone was 799 (787) TWh.
In 2017, the average electricity spot price, excluding capacity price, was unchanged at RUB 1,204 (1,204) per MWh in the First Price Zone.
| TWh | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nordic countries | 392 | 390 | 381 |
| Russia | 1,035 | 1,027 | 1,007 |
| Tyumen | 95 | 94 | 93 |
| Chelyabinsk | 33 | 35 | 35 |
| Russia Urals area | 261 | 259 | 258 |
| TWh | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spot price for power in Nord Pool power exchange, EUR/MWh | 29.4 | 26.9 | 21.0 |
| Spot price for power in Finland, EUR/MWh | 33.2 | 32.4 | 29.7 |
| Spot price for power in Sweden, SE3, Stockholm, EUR/MWh | 31.2 | 29.2 | 22.0 |
| Spot price for power in Sweden, SE2, Sundsvall, EUR/MWh | 30.8 | 29.0 | 21.2 |
| Spot price for power in European and Urals part of Russia, RUB/MWh 1) | 1,204 | 1,204 | 1,154 |
| Average capacity price, tRUB/MW/month | 535 | 481 | 359 |
| Spot price for power in Germany, EUR/MWh | 34.2 | 29.0 | 31.6 |
| Average regulated gas price in Urals region, RUB/1,000 m3 | 3,685 | 3,614 | 3,488 |
| Average capacity price for old capacity, tRUB/MW/month 2) | 148 | 140 | 149 |
| Average capacity price for new capacity, tRUB/MW/month 2) | 899 | 815 | 641 |
| Spot price for power (market price), Urals hub, RUB/MWh 1) | 1,041 | 1,054 | 1,047 |
| CO2, (ETS EUA), EUR/tonne CO2 | 6 | 5 | 8 |
| Coal (ICE Rotterdam), USD/tonne | 84 | 59 | 57 |
| Oil (Brent Crude), USD/bbl | 55 | 45 | 54 |
1) Excluding capacity tariff.
2) Capacity prices paid only for the capacity available at the time.
| TWh | 31 Dec 2017 | 31 Dec 2016 | 31 Dec 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nordic water reservoirs level | 86 | 75 | 98 |
| Nordic water reservoirs level, long-term average | 83 | 83 | 83 |
| TWh (+ = import to, - = export from Nordic area) | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Export/import between Nordic area and Continental Europe+Baltics | -15 | -10 | -18 |
| Export/import between Nordic area and Russia | 6 | 6 | 4 |
| Export/import Nordic area, total | -9 | -4 | -14 |
After two and a half years of legislative processing the revision of the EU Emissions Trading Scheme (ETS) for the period 2021–2030 was adopted in December. The new rules will increase the annual emission reduction target of the ETS from the current 1.74% to 2.2%. From the carbon market balance and pricing perspective the essential improvement is the strengthening of the Market Stability Reserve (MSR), including a temporary doubling of the intake rate from 12% to 24% during 2019–2023 and cancellation of allowances from the reserve from 2023 onwards. In addition, the new directive includes a provision for voluntary cancellation of allowances from the market.
However, the agreed setup is not yet in line with the Paris Climate Agreement and meets only the lower end of the EU 2050 goal to reduce emissions by 80–95% by 2050.
In June, the Swedish Government released a proposal on revision of hydro legislation including changes in the Environmental Act. This is a follow-up of the Swedish energy agreement done in summer 2016 and includes adjustments to meet requirements based on the EU Water Framework Directive. The aim is to mitigate environmental impacts and facilitate more efficient power production. According to the proposal, environmental permits for hydropower should be revised during a 20-year period in accordance with a national plan for prioritisation. The Ministry of Environment aims to have the revised legislation in place in March 2018.
Fortum emphasises the need to reform the Swedish system for hydro management. However, the proposal fails in ensuring a fair balance between environmental improvements and power production and a reasonable level of legal certainty.
The energy agreement requires hydro power companies to carry the full cost of environmental improvements. The largest hydro power companies are planning a joint fund in order to
Proposal for the use of the profit shown on the balance sheet Notes information
Financial performance and position Sustainability Risk management Fortum share and shareholders
secure financing for the improvements. The fund is expected to be in operation from July 2018 provided that the revision of hydro legislation has been completed.
In December, the Swedish Government decided on the waste fund fees for the period 2018–2020. The fees are based on a new structure with a calculated lifetime of 50 years and on parts of the funds capital being invested in shares.
In May, the Swedish Parliament adopted the proposed changes of nuclear and hydropower taxation in accordance with the energy agreement from June 2016. Starting from 1 July 2017, the tax on installed effect in nuclear reactors decreased by 90%, from SEK 14,770/MW/month to SEK 1,500/MW/month, and on 1 January 2018 the tax was abolished. The hydropower real-estate tax will be reduced from 2.8% to 0.5% in four steps by 2020.
Development of regional energy cooperation in the Nordic context moved forward in 2017. Following the June 2017 report by independent investigator Jorma Ollila, the Nordic energy ministers discussed the report in their annual meeting in November. They agreed on next-step actions to implement these proposals, including a proposal to establish a Nordic electricity market forum comprising various actors in the sector to discuss topics particularly related to development of the Nordic regional power market.
The Generation segment comprises power production in the Nordics including nuclear, hydro and thermal power production, powerportfolio optimisation, trading and industrial intelligence, and nuclear services globally.
| Change | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| EUR million | 2017 | 2016 | 17/16 |
| Sales | 1,677 | 1,657 | 1% |
| - power sales | 1,649 | 1,635 | 1% |
| of which Nordic power sales 1) | 1,342 | 1,339 | 0% |
| - other sales | 28 | 22 | 27% |
| Comparable EBITDA | 603 | 527 | 14% |
| Comparable operating profit | 478 | 417 | 15% |
| Operating profit | 501 | 338 | 48% |
| Share of profits from associates and joint ventures 2) |
-1 | -34 | 97% |
| Comparable net assets | |||
| (at period-end) | 5,672 | 5,815 | -2% |
| Comparable return on net assets, % | 8.4 | 6.9 | 22% |
| Capital expenditure and gross | |||
| investments in shares | 264 | 203 | 30% |
| Number of employees | 1,035 | 979 | 6% |
1) The Nordic power sales income and volume includes hydro and nuclear generation, excluding minorities. It does not include thermal generation, minorities, customer business or other purchases.
2) Power plants are often built jointly with other power producers, and owners purchase electricity at cost including interest cost and production taxes. The share of profit/loss is mainly IFRS adjustments (e.g. accounting for nuclear-related assets and liabilities) and depreciations on fair-value adjustments from historical acquisitions ( Note 18).
In 2017, the Generation segment's total power generation in the Nordic countries was 44.2 (45.3) TWh. CO2-free production accounted for 99% (99%) of the total production.
Comparable EBITDA increased to EUR 603 (527) million. Comparable operating profit improved to EUR 478 (417) million. The increase was mainly related to the higher achieved power price, and lower real-estate and capacity taxes in Swedish hydro and nuclear power plants, and was partly offset by lower nuclear production volumes resulting from the closure of Oskarshamn 1 and lower nuclear availability.
Operating profit clearly increased to EUR 501 (338) million and was positively affected by EUR 23 (-79) million of the IFRS accounting treatment (IAS 39) of derivatives mainly used for hedging Fortum's power production, updated provisions, and by nuclear fund adjustments ( Note 5).
The share of profits from associated companies and joint ventures totalled EUR -1 (-34) million ( Note 18).
The Nordic power price achieved in the Generation segment was EUR 31.8 (31.0) per MWh, EUR 0.8 per MWh higher than in 2016. The average system spot price of electricity in Nord Pool was EUR 29.4 (26.9) per MWh. The average area price in Finland was EUR 33.2 (32.4) per MWh and in Sweden (SE3, Stockholm) EUR 31.2 (29.2) per MWh.
| TWh | 2017 | 2016 | Change 17/16 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hydro power, Nordic | 20.7 | 20.7 | 0% |
| Nuclear power, Nordic | 23.0 | 24.1 | -5% |
| Thermal power, Nordic | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0% |
| Total in the Nordic countries | 44.2 | 45.3 | -2% |
| TWh | 2017 | 2016 | Change 17/16 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nordic sales volume | 51.8 | 52.4 | -1% |
| of which Nordic Power sales volume 1) | 42.2 | 43.2 | -2% |
1) The Nordic power sales income and volume includes hydro and nuclear generation, excluding minorities. It does not include thermal generation, minorities, customer business or other purchases.
| EUR/MWh | 2017 | 2016 | Change 17/16 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Generation's Nordic power price 2) | 31.8 | 31.0 | 3% |
2) Generation's Nordic power price includes hydro and nuclear generation, excluding minorities. It does not include thermal generation, minorities, customer business or other purchases.
UK Sweden Finland
City Solutions develops sustainable city solutions into a growing business for Fortum. The segment comprises heating and cooling, waste-to-energy, biomass and other circular economy solutions. The business operations are located in the Nordics, the Baltic countries and Poland. The segment also includes Fortum's 50% holding in Fortum Värme, which is a joint venture and is accounted for using the equity method.
| EUR million | 2017 | 2016 | Change 17/16 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sales | 1,015 | 782 | 30% |
| - heat sales | 523 | 448 | 17% |
| - power sales | 121 | 122 | -1% |
| - other sales | 370 | 212 | 75% |
| Comparable EBITDA | 262 | 186 | 41% |
| Comparable operating profit | 98 | 64 | 53% |
| Operating profit | 102 | 86 | 19% |
| Share of profits from associates and joint ventures |
80 | 76 | 5% |
| Comparable net assets | |||
| (at period-end) | 3,728 | 2,873 | 30% |
| Comparable return on net assets, % | 5.5 | 5.9 | -7% |
| Capital expenditure and gross | |||
| investments in shares | 556 | 807 | -31% |
| Number of employees | 1,907 | 1,701 | 12% |
In April 2017, Ekokem was rebranded to Fortum. The rebranded Ekokem forms City Solutions' Recycling and Waste Solutions unit.
On 4 August 2017, Fortum concluded the restructuring of its ownership in Hafslund. Fortum's 50% ownership in Fortum Oslo Varme (the combined company of Hafslund's Heat business area and Fortum Oslo Varme KEA has been consolidated as a subsidiary to Fortum in the results of City Solutions as of 1 August 2017.
Heat sales volumes amounted to 10.0 (8.7) TWh. Power sales volumes from CHP production totalled 2.6 (2.8) TWh, of which Fortum Oslo Varme's share was 0.7 TWh.
Sales increased to EUR 1,015 (782) million, mainly as a consequence of the consolidation of Ekokem and Fortum Oslo Varme.
Source: Nord Pool, Fortum
Comparable EBITDA increased and totalled EUR 262 (186) million. Comparable operating profit improved to EUR 98 (64) million. The consolidation of Fortum Oslo Varme had a positive effect of EUR 29 million on the comparable EBITDA and EUR 15 million on the comparable operating profit. In addition, the consolidation of Ekokem, improved power prices and fuel mix contributed positively to the results.
Operating profit totalled EUR 102 (86) million, including EUR 4 (22) of items affecting comparability ( Note 5).
The share of profits from associated companies and joint ventures totalled EUR 80 (76) million, including the share of profit from Fortum Värme ( Note 18).
| TWh | 2017 | 2016 | Change 17/16 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Finland | 3.9 | 3.6 | 8% |
| Poland | 3.7 | 3.6 | 3% |
| Other countries | 2.5 | 1.5 | 67% |
| Total | 10.0 | 8.7 | 15% |
| Change | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| TWh | 2017 | 2016 | 17/16 |
| Finland | 1.5 | 1.5 | 0% |
| Poland | 0.4 | 0.7 | -43% |
| Other countries | 0.7 | 0.6 | 17% |
| Total | 2.6 | 2.8 | -7% |
Consumer Solutions comprises electricity and gas retail businesses in the Nordics and Poland, including the customer service, invoicing and debt collection business. Fortum is the largest electricity retail business in the Nordics, with approximately 2.5 million customers across different brands in Finland, Sweden, Norway and Poland. The business provides electricity and related value-added products as well as new digital customer solutions.
| EUR million | 2017 | 2016 | Change 17/16 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sales | 1,097 | 668 | 64% |
| - power sales | 862 | 528 | 63% |
| - other sales | 235 | 139 | 69% |
| Comparable EBITDA | 57 | 55 | 4% |
| Comparable operating profit | 41 | 48 | -15% |
| Operating profit | 39 | 59 | -34% |
| Comparable net assets (at period-end) |
638 | 154 | 314% |
| Capital expenditure and gross investments in shares |
493 | 120 | 311% |
| Number of employees | 1,543 | 961 | 61% |
On 4 August 2017, Fortum concluded the restructuring of its ownership in Hafslund. Hafslund Markets has been consolidated into the results of Consumer Solutions as of 1 August 2017
Electricity and gas sales volumes totalled 24.4 (14.8) TWh. The total customer base at the end of the period was 2.49 (1.36) million.
Sales increased to EUR 1,097 (668) million, mainly due to the consolidation of Polish DUON and Hafslund.
Comparable EBITDA amounted to EUR 57 (55) million and comparable operating profit was EUR 41 (48) million. The consolidation of Hafslund had a positive effect of EUR 22 million on the comparable EBITDA and EUR 13 million on the comparable operating profit. The result improvement was offset by the lower average margin in electricity and gas products and higher costs arising from the increased focus and spend on the development of new digital services. The renegotiated invoicing service agreements for external distribution companies also had a negative impact on the results.
Operating profit declined to EUR 39 (59) million affected by sales gains and the IFRS accounting treatment (IAS 39) of derivatives, mainly used for hedging, EUR -2 (11) million ( Note 5).
| TWh | 2017 | 2016 | Change 17/16 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Electricity | 20.5 | 12.3 | 67% |
| Gas * | 4.0 | 2.5 | 60% |
* Not including wholesale volumes.
| Thousands * | 2017 | 2016 | Change 17/16 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Electricity | 2,470 | 1,350 | 83% |
| Gas | 20 | 10 | 100% |
| Total | 2,490 | 1,360 | 83% |
* Rounded to the nearest 10,000.
The Russia segment comprises power and heat generation and sales in Russia. The segment also includes Fortum's over 29% holding in TGC-1, which is an associated company and is accounted for using the equity method.
| Change | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| EUR million | 2017 | 2016 | 17/16 |
| Sales | 1,101 | 896 | 23% |
| - power sales | 837 | 691 | 21% |
| - heat sales | 258 | 199 | 30% |
| - other sales | 6 | 6 | 0% |
| Comparable EBITDA | 438 | 312 | 40% |
| Comparable operating profit | 296 | 191 | 55% |
| Operating profit | 295 | 226 | 31% |
| Share of profits from associates and | |||
| joint ventures | 31 | 38 | -18% |
| Comparable net assets | |||
| (at period-end) | 3,161 | 3,284 | -4% |
| Comparable return on net assets, % | 10.1 | 8.0 | 26% |
| Capital expenditure and gross | |||
| investments in shares | 277 | 201 | 38% |
| Number of employees | 3,495 | 3,745 | -7% |
After the completion of the multi-year investment programme in March 2016, Fortum's total capacity in Russia amounts to 4,794 MW, including 35 MW of solar power acquired at the end of 2017. The generation capacity built after the year 2007 amounts to 2,333 MW. Under the Russian Capacity Supply Agreement (CSA – "new capacity") this capacity entitles Fortum to guaranteed payments for approximately ten years after the commissioning of each new unit. The received capacity payments vary depending on age, location, type and size of the plant, as well as on seasonality and availability. The CSA payments can also vary somewhat on an annual basis, as they are linked to Russian Government long-term bonds with eight to ten years maturity. Electricity sales, TWh Sales increased to EUR 1,101 (896) million, mainly supported
In March 2017, the System Administrator of the wholesale market published its annual data which is the basis for the CSA payment calculation. These components comprise among others the weighted average cost of capital (WACC), the consumer price index (CPI) and re-examination of earnings from the electricity-only (spot) market (done every three and six years after commissioning of a unit). Fortum's CSA payment for 2017 was revised upwards to compensate for lower earnings from the electricity-only market. In addition, certain power plants were entitled to higher CSA payments when entering into the sevento-ten year time period of generation. The increase of the CSA payment was somewhat offset by lower Government bond rates and consumer price index (CPI).
Fortum's Russian capacity generation, totalling 2,461 MW, was allowed to participate in the Competitive Capacity Selection (CCS – "old capacity") for 2017. All Fortum plants offered in the auction were selected. Fortum has obtained forced mode status for 195 MW of its capacity, i.e. it receives higher-rate capacity payments.
In 2017, the Russia segment's power sales volumes amounted to 30.5 (29.5) TWh and heat sales volumes totalled 19.8 (20.7) TWh. The power volumes increased due to commissioning of the Chelyabinsk GRES unit 3.
by the strengthening of the Russian rouble, higher received CSA payments, the change in the heat supply scheme in Tyumen and commissioning of the Chelyabinsk GRES unit 3.
The Russia segment's comparable EBITDA was EUR 438 (312) million and the comparable operating profit was EUR 296 (191) million. The Russian rouble had a positive effect of EUR 31 million. The commissioning of the new unit, higher received CSA payments, higher power volumes, as well as improved bad-debt collections also affected the results positively.
Operating profit was EUR 295 (226) million, including sales gains of EUR 0 (35) million ( Note 5).
The share of profits from associated companies and joint ventures totalled EUR 31 (38) million ( Note 18).
| 2017 | 2016 | Change 17/16 |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Electricity spot price (market price), Urals hub, RUB/MWh |
1,041 | 1,054 | -1% |
| Average regulated gas price, Urals region, RUB/1,000 m3 |
3,685 | 3,614 | 2% |
| Average capacity price for CCS "old capacity", tRUB/MW/month 1) |
148 | 140 | 6% |
| Average capacity price for CSA "new capacity", tRUB/MW/month 1) |
899 | 815 | 10% |
| Average capacity price, tRUB/MW/ month |
535 | 481 | 11% |
| Achieved power price for Fortum in Russia, RUB/MWh |
1,813 | 1,734 | 5% |
| Achieved power price for Fortum in Russia, EUR/MWh 2) |
27.5 | 23.5 | 17% |
1) Capacity prices paid for the capacity volumes, excluding unplanned outages, repairs and own consumption.
2) Translated using average exchange rate.
Financial performance and position Sustainability Risk management Fortum share and shareholders
| EUR million | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|
| Capital expenditure | ||
| Intangible assets | 18 | 3 |
| Property, plant and equipment | 672 | 588 |
| Total | 690 | 591 |
| Gross investments in shares | ||
| Subsidiaries | 982 | 813 |
| Associated companies | 135 | 17 |
| Available for sale financial assets | 8 | 14 |
| Total | 1,125 | 844 |
See also Note 17.2 Capital expenditure.
Fortum expects to start the supply of power and heat from new power plants and to upgrade existing plants as follows:
| Type | Electricity capacity MW |
Heat capacity MW |
Supply starts |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Generation | ||||
| Loviisa, Finland | Nuclear | 6 | 2018 | |
| Hydro plants in Sweden and Finland |
Hydro | ~12 | 2018 | |
| City Solutions | ||||
| Zabrze, Poland | CHP | 75 | 145 | 2018 |
| Russia | ||||
| Ulyanovsk | 1 Jan | |||
| Wind | 35 | 2018 | ||
| Ulyanovsk | Wind | 50 1) | H1 2019 | |
| Other | ||||
| Solberg, Sweden | Wind | 75 2) | Q1 2018 | |
| Ånstadblåheia, | ||||
| Norway | Wind | 50 | 2018 | |
| Sørfjord, Norway | Wind | 97 | 2019 | |
| Karnataka, India | Solar | 100 | Q4 2017 |
1) Fortum-RUSNANO wind investment fund is a joint venture and Fortum's share is 50%.
2) Skellefteå Kraft AB (SKAB) is participating in the project with a 50% (37.5 MW) share.
Through its interest in Teollisuuden Voima Oyj (TVO), Fortum is participating in the building of Olkiluoto 3 (OL3), a 1,600-MW nuclear power plant unit in Finland. The plant's start of regular electricity production is expected to take place in May 2019, according to the plant supplier AREVA-Siemens Consortium.
Olkiluoto 3 is funded through external loans, share issues and shareholder loans according to shareholder agreements between the owners and TVO. As a 25% shareholder in Olkiluoto 3, Fortum has committed to funding of the project pro rata. At the end of December 2017, Fortum's shareholder loans to TVO amounted to EUR 145 million and the outstanding commitment for was EUR 88 million ( Note 20).
On 30 March 2017, the final decision regarding the minority redemption process of Ekokem Oyj shares was made by the arbitration court, bringing Fortum's ownership to 100%.
In May 2017, Fortum agreed to sell 100% of its shares in the Polish gas infrastructure company DUON Dystrybucja S.A. to Infracapital,
the infrastructure investment arm of M&G Investments. DUON Dystrybucja S.A. is transporting grid gas and LNG in Poland. The company was acquired as part of the acquisition of the electricity and gas sales company Grupa DUON S.A. (currently Fortum Markets Polska S.A.) in 2016. The divestment was concluded on 28 July 2017. The sale had a minor positive impact on Fortum's 2017 results.
On 27 April 2017, Fortum and RUSNANO, a Russian state-owned development company, signed a 50/50 investment partnership (joint venture) in order to secure the possibility of a Russian Capacity Supply Agreement (CSA) wind portfolio. In June, 1,000 MW of the bids of the Fortum-RUSNANO wind investment fund were selected in the Russian renewable energy auction. The bids were for projects to be commissioned during 2018–2022 with a price corresponding to approximately EUR 115–135 per MWh. The projects will be covered by CSA for a period of 15 years. The investment decisions will be made on a case-by-case basis within the total mandate of the wind investment fund. Fortum's equity stake in the wind investment fund totals a maximum of RUB 15 billion (currently approximately EUR 220 million). The amount is to be invested over time (approx. 5 years), subject to separate investment decisions. The investment fund has selected Vestas as the supplier of wind turbines in Russia. In October 2017,
Financial performance and position Sustainability Risk management Fortum share and shareholders
the wind investment fund made an investment decision on the first 50-MW wind farm. The wind farm is expected to start production during the first half of 2019.
In November 2017, Fortum completed the replacement investment at the Chelyabinsk GRES power plant. The new combined-cycle gas turbine (CCGT) unit with 247.5 MW of electricity generation capacity and 174 MW of heat capacity started commercial operation. The new turbine replaces the previous eight turbine generators in the power plant. This unit is not within the scope of the previously completed larger investment programme and consequently receives Competitive Capacity Selection (CCS) payments. Fortum's Chelyabinsk GRES site has electricity generation capacity of 742 MW and heat production capacity of 988 MW.
On 30 November 2017, Fortum signed an agreement to acquire three solar power companies from Hevel Group, Russia's largest integrated solar power company. The transaction was closed in December 2017. All three power plants are operational with a total capacity of 35 MW. The plants will receive Capacity Supply Agreement (CSA) payments for approximately 15 years after commissioning at an average CSA price corresponding to approximately EUR 430/MWh. The plants were commissioned in 2016 and 2017. Hevel Group will provide operation and maintenance services for all three power plants.
In January 2017, Fortum finalised the acquisition of three wind power projects from the Norwegian company Nordkraft. The transaction consists of the Nygårdsfjellet wind farm, which is already operational, as well as the fully-permitted Ånstadblåheia and Sørfjord projects. The wind farms are expected to be commissioned in 2018 and 2019. When built, the total installed capacity of the three wind farms will be approximately 170 MW. On 29 September 2017, Fortum announced the decision to invest in the Sørfjord wind farm in northern Norway. The Sørfjord wind park will have 23 wind turbines with a total capacity of 97 megawatts. The wind turbines for Sørfjord will be delivered by Siemens Gamesa Renewable Energy.
In March 2017, Fortum commissioned the 70-MW solar plant at Bhadla solar park in Rajasthan, India and in December 2017
Fortum commissioned the 100-MW solar plant at Pavagada solar park in Karnataka, India. Fortum won a reverse auction for the projects in 2016. The power plants will operate based on a Power Purchase Agreement (PPA), with a fixed tariff for 25 years. The Power Purchase Agreements have been made with National Thermal Power Corporation Limited (NTPC), India's largest power utility.
Sustainability is at the core of Fortum's strategy and, alongside Fortum's current businesses, the company is carefully exploring and developing new sources of growth within renewable energy production.
Fortum's goal is to be at the forefront of energy technology and application development. To accelerate innovation and the commercialisation of new offerings, Fortum is strengthening its in-house innovation and digitalisation efforts and building partnerships with leading global suppliers, promising technology and service companies, and research institutions. Fortum makes direct and indirect investments in start-ups that have promising new innovations focused on connectivity, have disruptive potential and accelerate the transition towards a circular economy. Fortum also invests in technologies that support better utilisation of the current asset base and that can create new markets and products for Fortum. The company is continuously looking for emerging clean energy solutions and for solutions that increase resource and system efficiency.
The Group reports its R&D expenditure on a yearly basis. In 2017, Fortum's R&D expenditure was EUR 53 (52) million, or 1.2% (1.4%) of sales.
| EUR million | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | Change 17/16 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| R&D expenditure, EUR million | 53 | 52 | 47 | 2% |
| R&D expenditure, % of sales | 1.2 | 1.4 | 1.4 |
On 8 February 2017, Markus Rauramo, Executive Vice President, City Solutions, was appointed Chief Financial Officer of the
company as of 1 March 2017 following Timo Karttinen's resignation from his CFO duties. At the same time, Per Langer, Senior Vice President, Technology and New Ventures, was appointed Executive Vice President, City Solutions, also as of 1 March 2017.
On 20 March 2017, Mikael Rönnblad, M.Sc. (Econ.), was appointed Executive Vice President, Consumer Solutions, and member of Fortum's Executive Management. Rönnblad started in his position on 15 May 2017.
On 31 October 2017, Matti Ruotsala, Deputy CEO, retired from the company.
On 9 November 2017, Fortum announced that Tapio Kuula, member of the Board of Directors and former President and CEO had passed away after a long illness. On 15 November 2017, Fortum's Shareholders' Nomination Board evaluated and confirmed the Board of Directors' ability to function with seven members until the Annual General Meeting 2018.
Fortum Corporation's Annual General Meeting, which was held in Helsinki on 4 April 2017, adopted the financial statements of the parent company and the Group for the financial period 1 January–31 December 2016, and discharged the members of Fortum's Board of Directors and the President and CEO from liability for the year 2016.
The Annual General Meeting decided to pay a dividend of EUR 1.10 per share for the financial year that ended on 31 December 2016. The record date for the dividend payment was 6 April 2017, and the dividend payment date was 13 April 2017.
The Annual General Meeting confirmed the remuneration of EUR 75,000 per year to the Chairman, EUR 57,000 per year to the Deputy Chairman, EUR 40,000 per year to each member of the Board, as well as EUR 57,000 per year to the Board member acting as the Chairman of the Audit and Risk Committee if he or she is not at the same time acting as Chairman or Deputy Chairman of the Board. In addition, a EUR 600 meeting fee is paid for Board meetings as well as for committee meetings. The meeting fee is doubled for Board members who live outside Finland in Europe and tripled for members living outside Europe. For Board members
Proposal for the use of the profit shown on the balance sheet Notes information
Financial performance and position Sustainability Risk management Fortum share and shareholders
The Annual General Meeting also confirmed the number of members in the Board of Directors to be eight. Ms Sari Baldauf was re-elected as Chairman, Mr Matti Lievonen was elected as a new member and Deputy Chairman, Mr Heinz-Werner Binzel, Ms Eva Hamilton, Mr Kim Ignatius, Mr Tapio Kuula and Mr Veli-Matti Reinikkala were re-elected as members, and Ms Anja McAlister was elected as a new member.
In addition, Authorised Public Accountant Deloitte & Touche Ltd (Deloitte Ltd as of 1 June 2017) was re-elected as auditor, with Authorised Public Accountant Ms Reeta Virolainen as the principal auditor. The auditor's fee is paid pursuant to an invoice approved by the company.
The Annual General Meeting authorised the Board of Directors to decide on the repurchase and disposal of the company's own shares up to a maximum number of 20,000,000 shares, which corresponds to approximately 2.25 per cent of all the shares in the company. It was also decided that own shares could be repurchased or disposed of in connection with acquisitions, investments or other business transactions, or be retained or cancelled. The repurchases or disposals could not be made for the purposes of the company's incentive and remuneration schemes. The authorisation cancelled the authorisation resolved by the Annual General Meeting of 2016 and it will be effective until the next Annual General Meeting and, in any event, for a period of no longer than 18 months.
At the meeting held after the Annual General Meeting, Fortum's Board of Directors elected from among its members to the Nomination and Remuneration Committee Matti Lievonen as Chairman and Sari Baldauf, Eva Hamilton, and Tapio Kuula as members. Furthermore, the Board elected to the Audit and Risk Committee Kim Ignatius as Chairman and Heinz-Werner Binzel, Anja McAlister and Veli-Matti Reinikkala as members.
On 9 October 2017, Pekka Timonen (Chairman), Director General of the Ministry of Economic Affairs and Employment, Timo Ritakallio, President and CEO, Ilmarinen Mutual Pension Insurance Company, and Elli Aaltonen, Director General, The Social Insurance Institution of Finland KELA, were appointed to Fortum's Shareholders' Nomination Board. In addition, Sari Baldauf, Chairman of Fortum's Board of Directors, is a member of the Shareholders' Nomination Board.
On 19 December 2017, Fortum announced that the Board of Directors has decided to commence the 2018–2020 long-term incentive (LTI) plan for key employees and executives. The 2018–2020 LTI plan is part of Fortum's ongoing LTI programme and follows the same principles as the previous plan. The performance measures applied to the 2018–2020 LTI plan will be based on cumulative Earnings Per Share over three years and Total Shareholder Return measured relative to the European Utilities Group, both with an equal weight of 50%. The 2018–2020 LTI plan will comprise approximately 110 participants, including the members of Fortum Executive Management. The maximum number of shares that may potentially be delivered as a reward under the 2018–2020 LTI plan, based on the currently prevailing price of Fortum's share, is expected not to exceed 700,000 shares.
On 8 January 2018, E.ON SE announced that it had decided to tender its 170,720,340 Uniper SE shares (corresponding to 46.65% of shares and voting rights) into Fortum's public takeover offer.
On 19 January 2018, Fortum announced that 46.93% of the share capital and the voting rights in Uniper were tendered during the initial acceptance period of Fortum's voluntary public takeover offer for the outstanding shares of Uniper corresponding to 171,736,647 shares. The initial acceptance period ended on 16 January 2018 and the additional acceptance period resumed on 20 January 2018 and will end on 2 February 2018.
Fortum's financial results are exposed to a number of economic, strategic, political, financial and operational risks.
One of the key factors influencing Fortum's business performance is the wholesale price of electricity in the Nordic region. The key drivers behind the wholesale price development in the Nordic region are the supply-demand balance, the prices of fuel and CO2 emission allowances, and the hydrological situation.
The world economy has recently been growing at an increasing pace. The overall economic growth impacts commodity and CO2 emission allowance prices, which has an effect on the Nordic wholesale price of electricity. In Fortum's Russian business, the key drivers are economic growth, the rouble exchange rate, regulation around the heat business, and the further development of the electricity and capacity markets. In all regions, fuel prices and power plant availability also impact profitability. In addition, increased volatility in exchange rates due to financial turbulence could have both translation and transaction effects on Fortum's financials, especially through the Russian rouble and Swedish krona.
In the Nordic countries, the regulatory and fiscal environment for the energy and environmental management sectors has also added risks for companies. The main strategic risk is that the regulatory and market environment develops in a way that we have not been able to foresee and prepare for. In response to these uncertainties, Fortum has analysed and assessed a number of future energy market and regulation scenarios, including the impact of these on different generation forms and technologies. As a result, Fortum's strategy was renewed in 2016 to include broadening the base of revenues and diversification into new businesses, technologies and markets. The environmental management business is based on the framework and opportunities created by environmental regulation. Being able to respond to customer needs created by the tightening regulation is a key success factor.
For further details on Fortum's risks and risk management, see the Risk management section of the Operating and financial review and Note 3 Financial risk management.
Proposal for the use of the profit shown on the balance sheet Notes information
Financial performance and position Sustainability Risk management Fortum share and shareholders
Outlook
Electricity is expected to continue to gain a higher share of total energy consumption. Electricity demand in the Nordic countries is expected to grow by approximately 0.5% on average, while the growth rate for the next few years will largely be determined by macroeconomic developments in Europe, and especially in the Nordic countries.
The price of oil and coal in 2017, was on a clearly higher level compared to the previous year. The price of CO2 emission allowances (EUA) also increased during the fourth quarter of 2017. The price of electricity for the upcoming 12 months decreased in the Nordics due to a stronger hydrological balance but increased in Germany due to higher fuel prices.
Late in January 2018, the forward quotation for coal (ICE Rotterdam) for the remainder of 2018 was around USD 88 per tonne and the market price for CO2 emission allowances for 2018 around EUR 8.90 per tonne. The Nordic system electricity forward price at Nasdaq Commodities for the remainder of 2018 was around EUR 27 per MWh and for 2019 around EUR 26 per MWh. In Germany, the electricity forward price for the remainder of 2018 and 2019 was around EUR 35 per MWh. Nordic water reservoirs were about 2 TWh below the long-term average, and were 7 TWh higher than a year earlier.
The Generation segment's achieved Nordic power price typically depends on such factors as hedge ratios, hedge prices, spot prices, availability and utilisation of Fortum's flexible production portfolio, and currency fluctuations. Excluding the potential effects from changes in the power generation mix, a 1 EUR/MWh change in the Generation segment's Nordic power sales achieved price will result in an approximately EUR 45 million change in Fortum's annual comparable operating profit. Achieved power price includes also the results of optimization of Fortum's hydro and nuclear
production as well as operations in the physical and financial commodity markets.
As a result of the nuclear stress tests in the EU, the Swedish Radiation Safety Authority (SSM) has decided on new regulations for Swedish nuclear reactors. For the operators, this means that safety investments should be in place no later than 2020.
The process to review the Swedish nuclear waste fees is done in a three-year cycle. The Swedish Nuclear Fuel and Waste Management Co (SKB) has updated the new technical plan including earlier shut down of some nuclear plants for the SSM to review. The final decision on the new nuclear waste fees for years 2018–2020 was made by the Swedish Government in December 2017 and was in line with SSM's proposal to the Government. On 25 October 2017, the Swedish Parliament decided on changes in the legal framework impacting calculations of nuclear waste fees and the investment of the nuclear waste fund. In the revised legal framework the assumed operating time for calculating the waste fee is 50 years, as opposed to the previous assumption of 40 years. The fund is now also allowed to invest in other financial instruments in addition to bonds. Based on these changes the annual waste fees for Fortum will increase by approximately EUR 8 million.
On 3 July 2017, Fortum announced the decision by the Administrative Court in Stockholm, Sweden, related to Fortum Sverige AB's hydro production-related real-estate tax assessments for the years 2009–2014. The Court decided in Fortum's favour. The disputed amount for the five years was a total of SEK 508 million (EUR 52 million). Fortum will book the tax income (subject to income tax) only after the legal decision has entered into force. Hydropower plants have been subject to a real-estate tax rate that has resulted in an approximately 12 times higher real-estate tax per kWh compared to any other production, due to different tax rates and different valuation factors. The tax authority has appealed the decision.
In October 2016, the Swedish Energy Agency presented a concrete proposal on how to increase the production of renewable electricity by 18 TWh in 2020–2030 within the electricity certificate system, as part of the Energy Agreement. In April 2017, the Swedish Government decided that the increase will be carried out in a linear manner.
In September 2016, the Swedish Government presented the budget proposal for the coming years. One of the key elements was the proposal that the taxation of different energy production forms should be more equal, and the tax burden of nuclear and hydro should be taken to the level of other production technologies. The budget states that the nuclear capacity tax will be reduced to 1,500 SEK/MW per month from 1 July 2017 and abolished on 1 January 2018. As a result, the tax for Fortum decreased by EUR 32 million due to the tax decrease and by another EUR 5 million due to the premature closure of Oskarshamn 1 in the middle of the year. In 2017, the capacity tax was EUR 52 million. In 2018, there is no capacity tax. As stated in the Government's budget, the hydropower real-estate tax will decrease from 2.8% to 0.5%; the tax will be reduced in four steps: in January 2017 to 2.2%; in January 2018 to 1.6%; in January 2019 to 1.0%; and in January 2020 to 0.5%. In 2017, the tax for Fortum decreased by EUR 20 million to EUR 95 million. In addition to the decrease in the tax rate, the hydropower realestate tax values, which are linked to electricity prices, will be updated in 2019. The real-estate tax values are updated every six years. With the current low electricity prices, the tax values in 2019 would be clearly lower than today. The process for renewing existing hydro permits will also be reformed.
In 2015, the Swedish OKG AB decided to permanently discontinue electricity production at Oskarshamn's nuclear plant units 1 and 2. Unit 1 was shut down on 17 June 2017, approximately 2 weeks earlier than planned, and unit 2 has been out of operation since June 2013. The closing processes for both units are estimated to take several years.
Proposal for the use of the profit shown on the balance sheet Notes information
Financial performance and position Sustainability Risk management Fortum share and shareholders
In City Solutions, stable growth, cash flow and earnings are achieved through investments in new plants and through acquisitions. Fuel cost, availability, flexibility and efficiency as well as gate fees are key drivers in profitability, but also the power supply/demand balance, electricity price and the weather affect profitability.
In May 2016, the Finnish Government decided to increase the tax on heating fuels by EUR 90 million annually from 2017 onwards. The negative impact on Fortum is estimated to be approximately EUR 5 million per year.
The development of acquired business operations of Fortum Oslo Varme is estimated to require integration-related one-time costs and increased investments over the coming years. The realisation of cost synergies are estimated to gradually start materialising from 2019 onwards with targeted annual synergies of EUR 5–10 million expected to be achieved by the end of 2020.
After the acquisition of Hafslund Markets in August, a new business strategy for Consumer Solutions, was approved by the Fortum Board of Directors in December. The strategic objective is to establish Consumer Solutions as the leading consumer business in the Nordics, with a customer-centric multi-brand structure.
Competition in the Nordic electricity retail market is expected to remain challenging, with continued pressure on sales margins and increasing customer churn. To counter the market challenges and create a solid foundation for competitive operations, Consumer Solutions will increase its resources and cost spend on developing new digital services for consumers.
The combined Hafslund Markets and Fortum Markets business, while largely complementary, have identified synergy potential, in terms of both revenue and costs. The short-term priority will be on achieving identified revenue synergies by leveraging established best practices and providing additional products and services to the whole customer base. The realisation of cost synergies will
start materialising once the integration of Hafslund Markets is completed, expected from 2019, with cost synergy realisation gradually increasing over the coming years, and targeted annual synergies of approximately EUR 10 million to be achieved by the end of 2020.
The Russia segment's new capacity generation built after 2007 under the Russian Capacity Supply Agreement (CSA) has been a key driver for earnings growth in Russia, as it receives considerably higher capacity payments than the old capacity. Fortum will receive guaranteed capacity payments for a period of approximately 10 years from the commissioning of a plant. The received CSA payment will vary depending on the age, location, size and type of the plants, as well as on seasonality and availability. CSA payments can vary somewhat annually because they are linked to Russian Government long-term bonds with 8 to 10 years maturity. In addition, the regulator will review the earnings from the electricityonly market three and six years after the commissioning of a unit and could revise the CSA payments accordingly. Furthermore, the level of the CSA payments increases starting from the seventh year of the 10-year period.
In June 2017, 1,000 MW of the bids of the 50/50-owned Fortum-RUSNANO wind investment fund were selected in the Russian wind auction. The bids are for projects to be commissioned during the years 2018–2022 with a price corresponding to approximately EUR 115–135 per MWh. The projects will be covered by CSA for a period of 15 years.
The long-term Competitive Capacity Selection (CCS) for the years 2017–2019 was held at the end of 2015, the CCS for the year 2020 in September 2016, and the CCS for the year 2021 in September 2017. All Fortum plants offered in the auction were selected. Fortum also obtained forced mode status, i.e. it receives payments for the capacity at a higher rate for some of the "old capacity". For the years 2017–2019, forced mode status was obtained for 195 MW; for the year 2020, 175 MW, and for the year 2021, 105 MW.
In December 2017, Fortum acquired three solar power companies from Hevel Group, Russia's largest integrated solar power company. All three power plants are operational and will receive CSA payments for approximately 15 years after commissioning at an average CSA price corresponding to approximately EUR 430/MWh. The plants were commissioned in 2016 and 2017.
Fortum's Ulyanovsk wind farm is listed in the registry of capacity as of January 2018. The 35 MW power plant is Russia's first industrial wind park. It will receive CSA payments for a guaranteed period of 15 years.
The Russian gas price increased by 3.9% in July 2017 and the increase of the annual average gas price for 2017 was 2.0%.
Fortum currently estimates its capital expenditure, including maintenance but excluding acquisitions, to be in the range of EUR 600–700 million in 2018 most of which is related to hydro and CHP capacity as well as new investments in renewables. The maintenance capital expenditure in 2018 is estimated at approximately EUR 300 million, well below the level of depreciation.
Financial performance and position Sustainability Risk management Fortum share and shareholders
The effective corporate income tax rate for Fortum in 2018 is estimated to be 19–21%, excluding the impact of the share of profits of associated companies and joint ventures, non-taxable capital gains, and a Swedish income tax case.
On 11 May 2017, the Administrative Court in Stockholm, Sweden, gave its decisions related to Fortum's income tax assessments for the year 2013. The Court's decisions were not in Fortum's favour. Fortum has appealed the decisions. If the decisions remain in force despite the appeal, the negative impact on the net profit would be approximately EUR 28 million (approximately SEK 273 million). Fortum has not made a provision for this, as, based on legal analysis, the EU Commission's view and supporting legal opinions, the cases should be ruled in Fortum's favour. The assessments concern the loans given in 2013 by Fortum's Dutch financing company to Fortum's subsidiaries in Sweden. The interest income for these loans was taxed in the Netherlands. The Swedish tax authority considers just over a half of the interest relating to each loan as deductible, i.e. deriving from business needs. The rest of the interest is seen as non-deductible. The decisions are based on the changes in the Swedish tax regulation in 2013.
On 30 June 2017, the Court of Appeal in Stockholm, Sweden, ruled against Fortum related to Fortum's income tax assessments in Sweden for the years 2009–2012. Due to the decision of the Court of Appeal, Fortum booked a tax cost of 1,175 MSEK (EUR 123 million) in the second-quarter 2017 results. The booking did not have any cash flow effect for Fortum, as the additional taxes and interest have already been paid in 2016. The case concerns Fortum's right to deduct intra-group interest expenses in Sweden in the years 2009– 2012. Fortum restructured its operations and reallocated loans in 2004–2005 to secure future operations. Fortum does not agree with the Court's decision and had applied for the right to appeal from the Supreme Administrative Court.
At the end of 2017, approximately 70% of Generation's estimated Nordic power sales volume was hedged at EUR 28 per MWh for 2018, and approximately 40% at EUR 25 per MWh for 2019.
The reported hedge ratios may vary significantly, depending on Fortum's actions on the electricity derivatives markets. Hedges are mainly financial contracts, most of them electricity derivatives quoted on Nasdaq Commodities.
Key figures 2008–2017 Parent company financial statements
Proposal for the use of the profit shown on the balance sheet Notes information
Financial performance and position
Sustainability Risk management Fortum share and shareholders
Fortum's business activities cover the production and sales of electricity and heat, waste-to-energy and circular economy solutions as well as energy-sector expert services and various consumer solutions. Fortum is the third largest power generator and the largest electricity retailer in the Nordic countries. Globally, the company is one of the leading heat producers. As two thirds of Fortum's power production is hydro and nuclear, it is also among the lowest-emitting generators in Europe.
Fortum's ambition is to increase its CO2-free power generation. The company also has generation capacity based on fossil fuels, located mainly in Russia, and it has worked to increase its efficiency and reduce its specific emissions. Fortum is focusing on increasing its solar and wind power capacity heavily over the coming years.
With core operations in 10 countries, Fortum employs a diverse team of close to 9,000 energy-sector professionals. Fortum has 128 hydro power plants as well as 26 CHP (combined heat and power), condensing and nuclear power plants. Globally, the company supplies heat in 22 cities and towns and has five main waste treatment facilities. Fortum's key markets are the Nordic and Baltic countries, Russia, Poland and India.
Fortum strives for balanced management of economic, social and environmental responsibility in the company's operations, emphasising the following focus areas:
| Economic responsibility |
Social responsibility |
Environmental responsibility |
|---|---|---|
| Economic benefits to our stakeholders |
Operational and occupational safety |
Energy and resource efficiency |
| Long-term value and growth |
Secure energy supply for customers |
Reduction of environmental impacts |
| Sustainable supply chain |
Personnel wellbeing | Climate-benign energy production and systems |
| Customer satisfaction Business ethics and | compliance | Solutions for sustainable cities |
The Group-level sustainability targets are linked to the main sustainability focus areas and emphasise Fortum's role in society. They measure not only environmental and safety targets, but also Fortum's reputation, customer satisfaction, employee wellbeing, and the security of power and heat production. Targets are set annually and are based on continuous operational improvement.
The achievement of the sustainability targets is monitored in monthly, quarterly and annual reporting. Fortum publishes a yearly Sustainability Report with additional information on the company's sustainability performance.
| Target | 2017 | 2016 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Economic responsibility | |||
| Reputation index, based on One | |||
| Fortum Survey | 70.7 | 72.3 | 72.5 |
| Level | |||
| Customer satisfaction index (CSI), | "good", | ||
| based on One Fortum Survey | 70–74 | 64–76 | 67–79 |
| Environmental responsibility | |||
| Specific CO2 emissions from total | |||
| energy production as a five-year | |||
| average, g/kWh | <200 | 188 | 188 |
| Energy-efficiency improvement | |||
| by 2020, base-line year 2012, | |||
| GWh/a | >1,400 | 1,502 | 1,372 |
| Major EHS incidents, no. | ≤21 | 20 | 22 |
| Social responsibility | |||
| Energy availability of CHP plants, % | >95.0 | 96.1 | 97.4 |
| Total recordable injury frequency | |||
| (TRIF), own personnel | ≤2.5 | 1.8 | 1.9 |
| Lost workday injury frequency | |||
| (LWIF), own personnel | ≤1.0 | 1.2 | 1.0 |
| Lost workday injury frequency | |||
| (LWIF), contractors | ≤3.5 | 4.2 | 3.0 |
| Severe occupational accidents, no. | ≤5 | 1 | 5 |
| Quality of investigation process of | |||
| occupational accidents, major EHS | Level | ||
| incidents and near misses | Level 1.0 | 0.75 | - |
| Sickness-related absences, % | ≤2.3 | 2.2 * | 2.3 * |
* Excluding DUON and Hafslund
Fortum is listed on the Nasdaq Helsinki exchange and is included in the STOXX Global ESG Leaders, OMX GES Sustainability Finland, ECPI® and Euronext Vigeo Eurozone 120 indices. Fortum is also ranked in category A- in the annual CDP (formerly the Carbon Disclosure Project) rating 2017, and it has received a Prime Status (B-) rating by the German oekom research AG.
Fortum's sustainability reporting covers all functions under Fortum's operational control, including subsidiaries in all countries of operation. Sustainability information relating to Hafslund Markets' and Fortum Oslo Varme's operations is included in Fortum's reporting as of August 2017. The figures for power and heat generation, capacities and investments include also figures from Fortum's share in associated companies and joint ventures that sell their production to the owners on cost basis. The Meri-Pori power plant is included fully in sustainability figures as Fortum has the environmental permit.
Fortum's operations are exposed to risks, which if materialised can have adverse effects on the environment and the safety and security of employees, contractors and neighbouring societies. Key sustainability risks are presented in the Risk management part in the Operating and financial review. Climate change and the need for decarbonisation and resource efficiency is changing energy industry in a profound way and these changes also create new business opportunities for Fortum.
Sustainability management at Fortum is strategy-driven and is based on the company's Values, the Code of Conduct, the Supplier Code of Conduct, the Sustainability Policy and other Group policies and their specifying instructions. As sustainability is an integral part of Fortum's strategy, the highest decision making of these issues falls on the duties of the Board of Directors, who share joint responsibility on sustainability matters.
Fortum Executive Management decides on the sustainability approach and Group-level sustainability targets that guide annual planning. The targets are ultimately approved by Fortum's Board of Directors. Fortum's line management is responsible for the implementation of the Group's policies and instructions and for day-to-day sustainability management. Realisation of the safety targets is a part of Fortum's short-term incentive system.
Fortum is a participant of the UN Global Compact initiative and the UN Caring for Climate initiative. Fortum respects and supports the International Bill of Human Rights, the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child, and the core conventions of the International Labour Organisation (ILO). Additionally, Fortum recognises in its operations the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights, the statutes of the OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises, the International Chamber of Commerce's anti-bribery and anti-corruption guidelines, and the Bettercoal initiative's Code on responsible coal mining.
The Fortum Code of Conduct and Fortum Supplier Code of Conduct define how we treat others, engage in business, safeguard corporate assets, and how Fortum expects suppliers and business partners to operate. Fortum's Board of Directors is responsible for the company's mission and Values and has approved the Fortum Code of Conduct. Fortum has zero tolerance for corruption and fraud and does not award donations to political parties or political activities, religious organisations, authorities, municipalities or local administrations.
In addition to internal reporting channels, Fortum employees and partners can report suspicions of misconduct confidentially to the Fortum Head of Internal Audit via the "raise-a-concern channel" on Fortum's internal and external web pages.
Suspected misconduct and measures related to ethical business practices and compliance with regulations are regularly reported to the Audit and Risk Committee.
No cases of suspected corruption or bribery related to Fortum's operations were reported in 2017.
| Social responsibility | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Economic | Environmental | Social and | Anti-corruption | ||
| responsibility | responsibility | employee matters | Human rights | and bribery | |
| Values | x | x | x | x | x |
| Code of Conduct | x | x | x | x | x |
| Supplier Code of Conduct | x | x | x | x | x |
| Disclosure Policy | x | x | |||
| Group Risk Policy | x | x | x | x | x |
| Sustainability Policy (including environmental, | |||||
| and health and safety policies) | x | x | x | x | x |
| Minimum Requirements for EHS Management | x | x | x | ||
| Biodiversity Manual | x | ||||
| Group Manual for Sustainability Assessment | x | x | x | x | |
| Human Resources Policy | x | x | |||
| Leadership Principles | x | x | |||
| Accounting Manual | x | x | x | ||
| Investment Manual | x | x | x | x | |
| Group Instructions for Anti-Bribery | x | x | x | ||
| Group Instructions for Safeguarding Assets | x | x | x | ||
| Group Instructions for Conflicts of Interest | x | x | x | ||
| Anti-Money-Laundering Manual | x | x | x | ||
| Compliance Guidelines for Competition Law | x | x | x | ||
| Security Guidelines | x | x | x | ||
| Policy for Sponsoring and Donations | x | x | x | x | |
| Group Instructions for Compliance | |||||
| Management | x | x | x | x | x |
Proposal for the use of the profit shown on the balance sheet Notes information
Financial performance and position Sustainability
Risk management Fortum share and shareholders
Fortum's goal is to achieve excellent financial performance in strategically selected core areas through strong competence and responsible ways of operating. Fortum measures financial performance with return on capital employed (target: at least 10%) and capital structure (target: comparable net debt/EBITDA around 2.5).
Fortum is a significant economic actor in its operating countries. The most significant direct monetary flows of Fortum's operations come from revenue from customers, procurements of goods and services from suppliers, compensation to lenders, dividends to shareholders, growth and maintenance investments, employee wages and salaries, and taxes paid. In 2017, investments in CO2-free production were EUR 375 (270) million.
Fortum supports social development and wellbeing in its operating countries by e.g. paying taxes. The tax benefits Fortum produces to society include not only corporate income taxes but also several other taxes. In 2017, Fortum's taxes borne were EUR 445 (365) million. Fortum publishes its tax footprint annually.
Targets for reputation and customer satisfaction are monitored annually. In the One Fortum Survey in 2017 company reputation among key stakeholders was 72.3 (72.5) points (on a scale of 1–100) and exceeded the target of 70.7 points. The stakeholder groups selected for the One Fortum Survey differ between the years 2016 and 2017. The reference value for the 2017 target-setting (70.7) is the reputation index (69.7) given by the same stakeholder groups in 2016. The Group target (70–74 points) for customer satisfaction was achieved among all business areas, but not in retail electricity sales. The Recycling and Waste Solutions unit was not part of the One Fortum survey in 2017.
Fortum's total purchasing volume in 2017 was EUR 3.2 (2.5) billion and Fortum had about 16,000 suppliers of goods and services. Fortum expects its business partners to act responsibly and to comply with the Fortum Code of Conduct and the Fortum Supplier Code of Conduct. Fortum assesses the performance of its business partners with supplier qualification and supplier audits. In 2017, Fortum audited a total of 11 (13) suppliers in China, India, Russia, Slovenia, Estonia and Finland. Most of the non-compliances identified in the audits in 2017 were related to occupational safety, working hours and remuneration.
Fortum's Group-level environmental targets are related to CO2 emissions, energy efficiency, and major environmental, health and safety (EHS) incidents.
The Group Sustainability Policy together with the Minimum Requirements for EHS Management steer Fortum's environmental management. Investments, acquisitions and divestments are assessed based on the sustainability assessment criteria defined in the Group's Investment Manual. Operational-level activities follow the requirements set forth in the ISO 14001 environmental management standard, and 99.8% (99.9%) of Fortum's power and heat production worldwide has ISO 14001 certification.
Fortum's aim is to promote resource efficiency improvements and the transition towards a more extensive circular economy. Resource efficiency and maximising the added value of waste and biomass are key priorities in the environmental approach, as defined in the Group Sustainability Policy.
In 2017, Fortum received a total of 1.2 million tonnes of nonhazardous waste and 640,000 tonnes of hazardous waste from customers. As much of the waste stream as possible is recycled, recovered or reused. Waste that is unsuitable for recycling or reuse as a material is incinerated in Fortum's waste-to-energy plants in the Nordic countries and Lithuania.
Fortum's energy production is primarily based on carbon dioxidefree hydropower and nuclear power and on energy-efficient combined heat and power (CHP). In line with the strategy, Fortum is targeting a gigawatt-scale solar and wind portfolio.
In 2017, Fortum's power generation was 73.2 (73.1) TWh and heat production 28.6 (27.8) TWh. 61% (62%) of the total power generation was CO2-free. In the EU area, 96% (96%) of the power generation was CO2-free. In 2017, Fortum built and acquired 294 MW of renewable, carbon-free production.
The main fuels that Fortum uses to produce electricity and heat are natural gas, nuclear fuel, coal, waste-derived fuels and biomass fuels. The most significant fuel was natural gas, which accounted for 62% (62%) of the total fuel consumption. The next highest fuel use was uranium 21% (23%). Coal accounted for 10% (10%) of the total fuel use, and waste-derived fuels and biomass fuels 3% (2%) and 3% (3%), respectively. Russia accounted for 99% of the use of natural gas and 51% of the use of coal.
Fortum expects the concern about climate change to increase the demand for low-carbon production and energy-efficient solutions and products. Fortum aims to mitigate climate change by investing in CO2-free energy production and by improving energy and resource efficiency. Fortum is also adapting its operations to climate change in production planning and in the assessment of growth projects and investments.
In 2017, Fortum's direct CO2 emissions were 18.3 (18.6) Mt. 84% (83%) of CO2 emissions originated from Russian power plants. Direct CO2 emissions decreased due to the reduction in condensing power production. Of the total CO2 emissions, 2.3 (2.7) Mt were within the EU's emissions trading scheme (ETS). The estimate for Fortum's free emission allowances is 1.0 (1.0) Mt.
| Fortum's total CO2 emissions (million tonnes, Mt) |
2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total emissions | 18.3 | 18.6 | 19.2 |
| Emissions subject to ETS | 2.3 | 2.7 | 2.1 |
| Free emissions allowances | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.3 |
| Emissions in Russia | 15.4 | 15.5 | 17.0 |
Fortum's specific carbon dioxide emissions from total energy production remained at the same level and were 184 (184) g/kWh. The specific CO2 emissions from total energy production as a fiveyear average were at 188 (188) g/kWh, which is better than Fortum's Group target of 200 g/kWh.
Financial performance and position Sustainability
Risk management Fortum share and shareholders
g/kWh
Fortum has had a Group target to achieve annual energy improvements of more than 1,400 GWh by 2020 compared to 2012. This target was reached (1,502 GWh/a) by the end of 2017.
Fortum's activities cause various emissions to air. In addition to carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions, these include flue-gas emissions such as sulphur dioxide (SO2), nitrogen oxide (NOx) and particle emissions. All power plants operate in compliance with their air emission limits.
| 1,000 tonnes | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sulphur dioxide emissions | 18.8 | 22.5 | 19.9 |
| Nitrogen oxide emissions | 27.5 | 26.0 | 26.8 |
| Particle emissions | 15.8 | 16.8 | 17.8 |
Fortum uses large volumes of water at various types of power plants and in district heat networks. In most cases, power plants do not consume water – the water is discharged back to the same water system from where it was withdrawn. Fortum withdrew a total of 2,100 (2,100) million m3 of water in power and heat production; 94% of this amount was used as cooling water.
In 2017, 23.4 (19.6) tonnes of spent nuclear fuel was removed from Loviisa power plant's reactors in Finland. High-level radioactive spent fuel is stored in an interim storage at the Loviisa power plant site. The final disposal of the high-level radioactive waste is scheduled to begin at Olkiluoto in Eurajoki in the first half of the 2020s.
Fortum's main impacts on biodiversity are related to hydropower production. Fuel procurement and flue-gas emissions may also have a negative impact on biodiversity. On the other hand, increasing CO2-free production mitigates the biodiversity loss caused by climate change. Fortum's Biodiversity Manual, revised in 2017, defines the company's approach in biodiversity management.
Fortum's target is fewer than 21 major EHS incidents annually. Major EHS incidents are monitored, reported and investigated, and corrective actions are implemented. In 2017, there were 20 (22) major EHS (environmental, health and safety) incidents in Fortum's operations. There were 10 (11) environmental incidents, out of which eight were spills. Fortum paid fines totalling RUB 8,000 (EUR 121) for the permit violation involving exceeding the wastewater emission limit in Russia. The major EHS incidents did not have significant environmental impacts.
Fortum's social responsibility targets are related to the secure supply of electricity and heat for customers, operational and occupational safety as well as employee wellbeing.
The Group Human Resources Policy is based on the company's Values, Leadership Principles and Code of Conduct. The HR Policy guides the daily work in the company, and the implementation of the policy is followed up regularly through the employee engagement survey, the annual performance and development discussions, as well as other feedback practices.
Fortum's operations are mainly based in the Nordic countries, Russia, Poland and the Baltic Rim area. The total number of employees at the end of 2017 was 8,785 (8,108). The number of employees increased mainly due to the acquisition of Hafslund.
| 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Number of employees, 31 December | 8,785 | 8,108 | 7,835 |
| Average number of employees | 8,507 | 7,994 | 8,009 |
| Total amount of employee benefits, EUR million |
423 | 334 | 351 |
| Departure turnover, % | 10.5 | 13.0 | 8.6 |
| Permanent employees, % | 95.2 | 96.1 | 96.0 |
| Full-time employees, % (of permanent employees) |
98.1 | 98.5 | 98.3 |
| Female employees, % | 32 | 29 | 29 |
| Females in management, % | 29 | 25 | 33 |
Number of employees, 31 December
For Fortum, excellence in safety is the foundation of the company's business and an absolute prerequisite for efficient and interruptionfree production. Fortum strives to be a safe workplace for the employees and for the contractors and service providers who work for the company. The Group Sustainability Policy, the Minimum Requirements for EHS Management and more detailed Grouplevel EHS manuals steer the work. A certified OHSAS 18001 safety management system covers 98.4% (99.9%) of Fortum's power and heat production worldwide.
2017 was a challenging year in terms of occupational safety. Only the total recordable incident frequency (TRIF) for own employees and the number of severe accidents met the set target level.
The TRIF for Fortum employees was 1.8 (1.9) per one million working hours, which is better than the target (≤ 2.5). The lostworkday injury frequency (LWIF) for own personnel was 1.2 (1.0), which did not meet the set target level (≤1.0).
The lost workday injury frequency (LWIF) for contractors continues to be Fortum's main challenge. The LWIF for contractors per million working hours was 4.2 (3.0), and Fortum did not achieve the target of ≤3.5. The same challenge applies to the combined LWIF (own employees and contractors): the result was 2.4 (1.8), exceeding the target of 1.9.
In 2018, Fortum will implement new tools to assess contractor safety performance as part of the supplier qualification process and will also evaluate their safety practices in a more systematic manner during work. Fortum will also introduce external safety training for both the management level and key individuals leading safety work as well as the most challenging business areas.
In 2017, as in 2016, there were no accidents leading to a fatality in the company's operations.
Open leadership, personnel development and wellbeing In late 2017, Fortum launched the company's revised Values and new Leadership Principles. The Open Leadership framework supports cooperation across units and aims to create an environment that fosters innovation, flexibility and agility.
ForCare, Fortum's programme for overall wellbeing at work, aims to promote health, safety, employee work capacity and work community functionality. As part of ForCare, the Energise Your Day wellbeing programme was launched in several new operating countries in 2017. The percentage of sickness-related absences excluding DUON and Hafslund was 2.2 (2.3), which is better than the target level of ≤2.3. The percentage of sickness-related absences for Hafslund was 3.0.
Fortum's goal is to operate in accordance with the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights, and to apply these principles in own operations as well as in country and partner risk assessments and supplier audits.
A sustainability assessment, including a human rights evaluation, is carried out for investment projects – especially in new operating areas – and also for new countries where Fortum plans to expand the sales of products and services. In 2017, 15 (28) of these assessments were made.
In 2017, there were no grievances related to human rights filed through Fortum's formal grievance channels, nor were there any grievances carried over from the previous year.
An uninterrupted and reliable energy supply is critical for society to function. With planned preventive maintenance and condition monitoring, Fortum ensures that the power plants operate reliably to produce the electricity and heat customers need. The energy availability of the company's CHP plants in 2017 was, on average, 96.1%; the target was above 95%.
Fortum's operations impact the local communities where the power plants are located, and the company engages in many kinds of collaboration with local stakeholders. Fortum's Policy for Sponsoring and Donations was revised in late 2017. According to the policy Fortum's sponsoring will focus on wellbeing of children and youth, renewable energy projects, R&D and innovations supporting Fortum's strategy, recycling, recovery and reutilization. The company also does significant collaboration with different research and development projects, particularly with Nordic universities. In 2017, Fortum's support for activities promoting the common good totalled about EUR 4.9 (2.9) million. The grants awarded by Fortum Foundation were about EUR 696,000 (675,000). Fortum Foundation is not part of Fortum Group.
Risk management
Sustainability Fortum share and shareholders
Fortum's Risk Management framework is comprised of the Group Risk Policy and supporting documents. The Group Risk Policy includes an overview of Fortum's risk management systems consisting of the general principles of risk management and the main features of the risk management process. The objective of the risk management systems are to;
The main principle is that risks are managed at source meaning that each Division, Development Unit and Corporate Function Head is responsible for managing risks that arise within their business operations. However, in order to take advantage of synergies, certain risks are managed centrally. For example, Group Treasury is responsible for managing financial risks and cyber and information security risks are managed by Corporate Security. The Audit and Risk Committee (ARC) is responsible for monitoring the efficiency of the company's risk management systems and for annually reviewing the Group Risk Policy and the material risks and uncertainties. Corporate Risk Management, a function headed by the Chief Risk Officer (CRO) reporting to the CFO, provides instructions and tools which support the Group in running an efficient risk management process. Corporate Risk Management is responsible for assessing and reporting maturity of
risk management in Divisions, Development Units and Corporate Functions and for providing independent monitoring and reporting of material risk exposures to Group Management, the ARC and the Board of Directors. Risk control functions and controllers in the business monitor and report risks to the CRO.
Fortum's risk management process is designed to support the achievement of agreed targets by ensuring that risk management activities are consistent with the general principles of risk
management and that risks are monitored and followed-up in a prudent manner. The main features of risk management process consist of event identification, risk assessment, risk response and risk control. Identification is carried out according to a structured process and risks are assessed in terms of impact and likelihood according to a Group-common methodology. Impact is assessed not only in monetary terms, but also in terms of health and safety, the environment and reputation. Risk owners, responsible for implementing actions to respond to the risk, are defined by the business and operational management. Risk responses can be to avoid, mitigate, transfer or absorb the risk. Risk control processes, which include monitoring and reporting of risks, are designed to support compliance with approved instructions, manuals and guidelines and to ensure that risk exposures remain within approved limits and mandates.
Fortum's Board of Directors annually approves the Group Risk Policy and the CEO annually approves Group Risk Instruction
Financial performance and position Risk management
Sustainability Fortum share and shareholders
covering commodity market risks, counterparty credit risks, and operational risks. Fortum also has other Group policies and instructions covering e.g. compliance, sustainability, treasury and cyber and information security risks which are aligned with the Group Risk Policy. Risk mandates or limits are defined for commodity market risks, counterparty credit risks and financial risks.
The main strategic risk is that the regulatory and market environment develops in way that we have not been able to foresee and prepare for. Future energy market and regulation scenarios, including the impact of these to Fortum's business, are continuously assessed and analysed. It is part of Fortum's strategy
to, in the long-term, broaden the base of revenues and diversify into new businesses, technologies and markets.
Risks which could hinder Fortum in executing this strategy are continuously assessed, monitored and reported as part of the strategy work. These risks include an inability to identify and carry out successful investments and acquisitions with the related project and integration risks, inability to manage and respond to changes in energy policy and the regulatory environment, and inability to manage and respond to changes in technology.
Fortum's strategy includes growth of operations in new businesses, technologies and geographies, and any future investment or acquisition, including partnerships, entails risk such as:
These risks are managed as part of the investment process which includes requirements for risk identification and assessment and action plans before investment decisions are made, and also sets requirements to follow-up risks in projects and acquisitions.
The energy business is heavily influenced by national and EUlevel energy policies and regulations, and Fortum's strategy has been developed based on scenarios of the future development of the regulatory environment in both existing and potential new businesses and market areas. The overall complexity and possible regulatory changes in Fortum's various operating countries pose a risk if we are not able to anticipate, identify and manage those changes efficiently.
Fortum maintains an active dialogue with the bodies involved in the development of laws and regulations in order to manage these risks and proactively contribute to the development of the energy policy and regulatory framework.
Fortum's strategy in the power sector is based on a market-driven development, which would mean more interconnections and competition supported by increasing policy harmonization. Even if the Nordic power market has a long tradition of harmonization, national policies vary considerably when it comes to e.g. taxation, permitting, subsidies and market model meaning that we have to manage risks related to both EU regulation and national regulation. Potential risks related to the future energy and climate policy framework include;
Key figures Parent company financial statements
Proposal for the use of the profit shown on the balance sheet Notes information
Financial performance and position Risk management
2008–2017
Sustainability Fortum share and shareholders
The inter-linkage of these issues as well as national measures such as taxation create uncertainty and changes in policies in one area could undermine the effects of policy changes in other areas.
Russia is exposed to political, economic and social uncertainties and risks resulting from changes in regulation, legislation, economic and social upheaval and other similar factors. The current economic sanctions may be enlarged and/or extended having direct and indirect impacts on the business environment. The main policy-related risks in Russia are linked to the development of the whole energy sector, part of which, like the wholesale power market, is liberalised while other parts, like gas, heat, and retail electricity, are not. The wholesale power market deregulation in Russia has been implemented to a large extent according to original plans. However, regulated sectors are inherently always exposed to a risk of regulatory changes which could affect Fortum's operations.
Fortum's strategy includes developing or acquiring new technologies, as well as digitalizing the business. Fortum's R&D and innovation activities focus on the development of the energy system towards a future solar economy. Fortum is, for example, developing circular economy, bio-economy and other renewable energy concepts as well as innovative solutions for its customers. New technologies expose Fortum to risks related to intellectual property rights, data privacy and viability of technologies. Technology risks are managed primarily through developing a diversified portfolio of projects consisting of different technologies.
Corporate social responsibility and sustainable development are integral parts of Fortum's strategy. Fortum gives balanced consideration to economic, environmental and social responsibility. Changes to laws, regulations and the business environment can pose a risk if not identified and managed effectively and the same applies to changes in views of our main stakeholders. In order to identify and manage these risks, Fortum endorses a number of international voluntary charters, standards and guidelines in the area of sustainability, conducts stakeholder surveys annually and has defined internal policies and instructions on how to conduct business. Corporate Functions, Divisions and Development units identify and assess sustainability risks related to their operations and define mitigation measures annually. Corporate Sustainability executes oversight as part of the Group's risk management process.
Operating power and heat generation plants, circular economy services and waste management involves use, storage and transportation of fuels and materials that can have adverse effects on the environment and expose personnel, contractors and third parties to safety risks. Assessment of environmental risks and preparedness to operate in exceptional and emergency situations follows legislative requirements as well as the requirements in the environmental management standard (ISO 14001). The same approach, based on the requirements in the operational health and safety standard (OHSAS 18001), applies to risks related to occupational health and safety and actions in emergency situations.
Environmental, health and safety (EHS) risks as well as social risks related to Fortum's supply chain are evaluated through supplier qualification, internal and external audits and risk assessments including partner and country risk assessment. Corrective and preventive actions are implemented when necessary. EHS related risks together with social risks arising in investments are evaluated in accordance with Fortum's Investment manual. Environmental risks and liabilities in relation to past actions have been assessed and provisions have been made for future remedial costs.
Fortum's operations are exposed to physical risks caused by climate change, including changes in weather patterns that could alter energy demand and, for instance, hydropower production volumes. Higher precipitation and temperatures may affect hydropower production, dam safety, and also bioenergy supply
and availability. Fortum adapts its operations to the changing climate and takes it into consideration, for example, in production and maintenance planning and in evaluating growth and investment projects.
Fortum operates in a number of countries and is therefore exposed to changes in taxation and how tax authorities interpret tax laws. Changes in the international fiscal environment have created a tax environment that is leading to new or increased taxes and new interpretations of existing tax laws which has decreased the predictability and visibility around how our operations are taxed.
Fortum's tax policy aims to identify simple and cost-efficient solutions to manage taxes in a sustainable manner. Fortum's tax policy is based on a principle that tax is a consequence of business and that compliance with tax rules and legislation and transparency result in a correct tax contribution. This policy leaves no room for artificial or other aggressive solutions. Fortum is continuously following the development of tax related issues and their impact on the Group and maintains an active dialogue with tax authorities in unclear cases. Tax-related issues are communicated openly both internally and externally and Fortum's tax footprint is published annually.
Fortum's operations are subject to laws, rules and regulations set forth by the relevant authorities, exchanges, and other regulatory bodies in all markets in which Fortum operates. Fortum's ability to operate in certain countries may be affected by future changes to local laws and regulations.
Fortum Code of Conduct enhances the understanding of the importance of business ethics for all Fortum employees, contractors and partners. Prevention of corruption is one of the Code of Conduct's focus areas. Fortum has procedures for anti-corruption including prevention, oversight, reporting and enforcement based on the requirements prescribed in international legislation. Fortum's supplier code of conduct sets
Proposal for the use of the profit shown on the balance sheet Notes information
Financial performance and position Risk management
Sustainability Fortum share and shareholders
sustainability requirements for suppliers of goods and services. The Supplier Code of Conduct is based on the principles of the United Nations Global Compact and is divided into four sections: business principles including anti-corruption, human rights, labour standards and environment.
Fortum systematically identifies, assesses, mitigates and reports compliance risks including risks related to sustainability and business ethics. Internal controls are implemented to prevent the possibilities of unauthorised activities or non-compliance with Group policies and instructions.
Fortum's business is exposed to fluctuations in prices and availability of commodities used in the production and sales of energy products. The main exposure is toward electricity prices and volumes, prices of emissions and prices and availability of fuels. Fortum hedges its exposure to commodity market risks in accordance with annually approved Hedging Guidelines, Strategies and Mandates. For further information on hedge ratios, exposures, sensitivities and outstanding derivatives contracts, see Note 3 Financial risk management.
In competitive markets, such as in the Nordic region, the wholesale price of electricity is determined as the balance between supply and demand. The short-term factors affecting electricity prices and volumes on the Nordic market include hydrological conditions, temperature, CO2 allowance prices, fuel prices, economic development and the import/export situation.
Electricity price risks are hedged by entering into electricity derivatives contracts, primarily on the Nasdaq Commodities power exchange. Hedging strategies are continuously evaluated as electricity and other commodity market prices, the hydrological balance and other relevant parameters change. Hedging of the Generation segment's power sales is performed in EUR on a Nordic level covering both Finland and Sweden, and the currency
component of these hedges in the Swedish entity is currently not hedged. In Russia, electricity prices and capacity sales are the main sources of market risk. The electricity price is highly correlated with the gas price and exposure is mitigated through the use of fixed-price bilateral agreements. In India, the electricity price received from solar production are fixed through long term powerpurchasing agreements.
The European Union has established an emissions trading scheme to reduce the amount of CO2 emissions. In addition to the emissions trading scheme, there are other trading schemes in environmental values in place in Sweden, Norway and Poland. Part of Fortum's power and heat generation is subject to requirements of these schemes. There is currently no trading scheme in Russia for emissions or other environmental values.
The main factor influencing the prices of CO2 allowances and other environmental values is the supply and demand balance. Fortum hedges its exposure to these prices and volumes through the use of CO2 futures and environmental certificates.
Power and heat generation requires use of fuels that are purchased on global or local markets. The main fuels used by Fortum are natural gas, uranium, coal, various biomass-based fuels and waste. The main risk factor for fuels that are traded on global markets such as coal and natural gas, is the uncertainty in price. Prices are largely affected by demand and supply imbalances that can be caused by, for example, increased demand growth in developing countries, natural disasters or supply constraints in countries experiencing political or social unrest. For fuels traded on local markets, such as bio-fuels, the volume risk in terms of availability of the raw material of appropriate quality is more significant as there may be a limited number of suppliers. Due to the sanctions and economic development in Russia, the risks related to imported fuels from Russia have increased.
In the Nordic market, exposure to fuel prices is limited due to Fortum's flexible generation capacity which allows for switching
between different fuels according to prevailing market conditions. In some cases, the fuel price risk can be transferred to the customer. The remaining exposure to fuel price risk is mitigated through fixed-price physical delivery contracts or derivative contracts. The main fuel source for heat and power generation in Russia is natural gas. Natural gas prices are partially regulated, so the price risk exposure is limited.
Fortum's business is capital intensive and there is a regular need to raise financing. Fortum maintains a diversified financing structure in terms of debt maturity profile, debt instruments and geographical markets. Liquidity and refinancing risks are managed through a combination of cash positions and committed credit facility agreements with its core banks. The credit risk of cash positions has been mitigated by diversifying the deposits to highcredit quality financial institutions and issuers of corporate debt. In relation to the offer for Uniper shares, Fortum has commitments from 10 relationship banks to provide credit facilities at the request of Fortum in an aggregate amount of up to EUR 12,000 million.
Fortum's debt portfolio consists of interest-bearing liabilities and derivatives on a fixed- and floating-rate basis with differing maturity profiles. Fortum manages the duration of the debt portfolio through use of different types of financing contracts and interest rate derivative contracts such as interest rate swaps.
Fortum's currency exposures are divided into transaction exposures (foreign exchange exposures relating to contracted cash flows and balance sheet items where changes in exchange rates will have an impact on earnings and cash flows) and translation exposure (foreign exchange exposure that arises when profits and balance sheets in foreign entities are consolidated at the Group level). The main principle is that material transaction exposures should be hedged while translation exposures are not hedged, or are hedged selectively. An exception is the Generation segment's hedging of power sales in Sweden where the currency component is currently not hedged. The main translation exposures toward the
Key figures 2008–2017 Parent company financial statements
Proposal for the use of the profit shown on the balance sheet Notes information
Financial performance and position Risk management
Sustainability Fortum share and shareholders
EUR/RUB, EUR/SEK and EUR/NOK are monitored continuously. Changes in these currency rates affect Fortum's profit level and equity when translating results and net assets to euros.
Fortum is exposed to counterparty risk whenever there is a contractual arrangement with an external counterparty including customers, suppliers, partners, banks, clearing houses and trading counterparties.
Credit risk exposures relating to financial derivative instruments are often volatile. The majority of commodity derivatives are cleared through exchanges such as Nasdaq OMX commodities. The trend toward more use of futures contracts instead of forward contracts is decreasing the credit exposure toward clearing houses. Derivatives contracts are also entered into directly with external counterparties and such contracts are limited to high-credit-quality counterparties active on the financial or commodity markets.
Due to the financing needs and management of liquidity, Fortum has counterparty credit exposure to a number of banks and financial institutions. The majority of the exposure is toward Fortum's key relationship banks, which are highly creditworthy institutions, but also includes exposure to the Russian financial sector in terms of deposits with financial institutions as well as to banks that provide guarantees for suppliers and contracting parties. Deposits in Russia have been concentrated to the most creditworthy state-owned or controlled banks.
Credit risk exposures relating to customers is spread across a wide range of industrial counterparties, small businesses and private individuals over a range of geographic regions. The majority of exposure is to the Nordic market, Poland and Russia. The risk of non-payment in the electricity and heat sales business in Russia is higher than in the Nordic market. In order to manage counterparty credit risk, Fortum has routines and processes to identify, assess and control exposure. Credit checks are performed before entering into commercial obligations and exposure limits are set for larger individual counterparties. Creditworthiness is monitored through the use of internal and external sources so that mitigating actions
can be taken when needed. Mitigating actions include demanding collateral, such as guarantees, managing payment terms and contract length, and the use of netting agreements.
Operational risks are defined as the negative effects resulting from inadequate or failed internal processes, systems or equipment, or from external events. Process-related risks are assessed and controls for the most relevant risks are defined and implemented as part of the internal controls framework. Equipment and system risks are primarily managed through monitoring and maintenance planning. In addition, all Fortum's industrial assets are covered by a Group Master Policy covering property damage and business interruption risks which mitigates the impact of internal and external events.
CHP production and the recycling and waste business involve the use, storage and transportation of fuels and waste (including hazardous waste). Leakage and contamination of the surrounding environment could lead to clean-up costs and third-party liabilities. An explosion or fire at a facility could cause damages to the plant or third-parties and lead to possible business interruption. These risks are mitigated by condition monitoring, preventive maintenance and other operational improvements as well as competence development of personnel operating the plants. Requirements for waste are clearly specified and samples are tested for selected incoming waste deliveries. Risks in large CHP projects are mitigated through contract structures and insurance coverage.
Operational events at hydro power generation facilities can lead to physical damages, business interruptions, and third- party liabilities. A long-term program is in place for improving the surveillance of the condition of dams and for securing the discharge capacity in extreme flood situations. In Sweden, thirdparty liabilities from dam failures are strictly the plant owner's
responsibility. Together with other hydro power producers, Fortum has a shared dam liability insurance program in place that covers Swedish dam failure liabilities up to SEK 10,000 million.
Fortum owns the Loviisa nuclear power plant, and has minority interests in two Finnish and two Swedish nuclear power companies. At the Loviisa power plant, the assessment and improvement of nuclear safety is a continuous process performed under the supervision of the Radiation and Nuclear Safety Authority of Finland (STUK).
Third-party liability relating to nuclear accidents is strictly the plant operator's responsibility and must be covered by insurance. As the operator of the Loviisa power plant, Fortum has a statutory liability insurance policy of 600M SDR (Special Drawing Right) and the same type of insurance policies are in place for the operators where Fortum has a minority interest.
Fortum's business operations are dependent on well-functioning IT and information management systems and processes. Due to the nature of the business, large amounts of data are processed, often in real-time, and used for decision-making and in internal and external communication and reporting. Securing information and availability of the systems are essential for Fortum. Cyber security risks, including risks related to information, industrial control systems (ICS), digitalization and privacy, are managed centrally by Corporate Security. Group instructions and procedures set requirements for managing and mitigating cyber security risks.
General Data Protection Regulation will become applicable on 25th of May 2018. The regulation contains a number of requirements related to processing personal data. Therefore, Fortum has established a Group-wide program to ensure the fulfilment of the requirements.
IT functions in the business, support functions and outsourcing partners are responsible for identifying and mitigating operational IT security related risks as well as managing IT security incidents. IT functions are also responsible for IT service continuity.
Financial performance and position
Sustainability Risk management
Fortum Corporation's shares have been listed on Nasdaq Helsinki since 18 December 1998. The trading code is FORTUM (until 25 January 2017: FUM1V). Fortum Corporation's shares are in the Finnish book entry system maintained by Euroclear Finland Ltd which also maintains the official share register of Fortum Corporation.
| EUR | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings per share | |||
| Continuing operations | 0.98 | 0.56 | -0.26 |
| Discontinued operations | - | - | 4.92 |
| Total Fortum | 0.98 | 0.56 | 4.66 |
| Cash flow per share total Fortum | 1.12 | 0.7 | 1.55 |
| Cash flow per share, continuing operations | 1.12 | 0.7 | 1.38 |
| Equity per share | 14.69 | 15.15 | 15.53 |
| Dividend per share | 1.10 1) | 1.10 | 1.10 |
| Extra dividend per share | - | - | - |
| Payout ratio, % | 112.2 1) | 196.4 | 23.6 |
| Dividend yield, % | 6.7 1) | 7.5 | 7.9 |
1) Board of Directors' proposal for the Annual General Meeting 28 March 2018.
For full set of share Key figures 2008–2017, see the section Key figures in the Financial Statements.
Fortum's mission is to deliver excellent value to its shareholders. Fortum's share price has appreciated approximately 15% during the last five years, while Dow Jones European Utility Index has increased 11%. During the same period Nasdaq Helsinki Cap index has increased 67%. During 2017 Fortum's share price appreciated approximately 13%, while Dow Jones European Utility index increased 7% and Nasdaq Helsinki Cap index increased 5%.
In 2017, a total of 582.9 million (2016: 611.6) Fortum Corporation shares, totalling EUR 8,906 million, were traded on the Nasdaq Helsinki. The highest quotation of Fortum Corporation shares during 2017 was EUR 18.94, the lowest EUR 12.69, and the volume-weighted average EUR 15.28. The closing quotation on the last trading day of the year 2017 was EUR 16.50 (2016: 14.57). Fortum's market capitalisation, calculated using the closing quotation of the last trading day of the year, was EUR 14,658 million (2016: 12,944).
In addition to the Nasdaq Helsinki, Fortum shares were traded on several alternative market places, for example at Boat, Cboe and Turquoise, and on the OTC market as well. In 2017, approximately 61% (2016: 63%) of Fortum's shares were traded on markets other than the Nasdaq Helsinki Ltd.
Fortum has one class of shares. By the end of 2017 a total of 888,367,045 shares had been issued. Each share entitles the holder to one vote at the Annual General Meeting. All shares entitle holders to an equal dividend. At the end of 2017 Fortum Corporation's share capital, paid in its entirety and entered in the trade register, was EUR 3,046,185,953.00.
Sustainability Risk management
Financial performance and position Fortum share and shareholders
At the end of 2017, the Finnish State owned 50.76% of the company's shares. The Finnish Parliament has authorised the Government to reduce the Finnish State's holding in Fortum Corporation to no less than 50.1% of the share capital and voting rights.
The proportion of nominee registrations and direct foreign shareholders was 30.6 % (2016: 28.1%).
| Shareholders | No. of shares | Holding % |
|---|---|---|
| Finnish State | 450,932,988 | 50.76 |
| The Finnish Social Insurance Institution | 7,030,896 | 0.79 |
| Ilmarinen Mutual Pension Insurance Company | 6,220,000 | 0.70 |
| Kurikan Kaupunki | 6,203,500 | 0.70 |
| The State Pension Fund | 4,600,000 | 0.52 |
| Elo Mutual Pension Insurance Company | 4,000,000 | 0.45 |
| Varma Mutual Pension Insurance Company | 3,050,167 | 0.34 |
| The Local Government Pensions Institution | 2,568,955 | 0.29 |
| Nordea Suomi Pro fund | 2,545,929 | 0.29 |
| Schweizerische Nationalbank | 1,977,723 | 0.22 |
| Danske Invest Suomi Osakeyhtiö fund | 1,239,436 | 0.14 |
| Society of Swedish Literature in Finland | 1,156,375 | 0.13 |
| Etera Mutual Pension Insurance Company | 1,132,142 | 0.13 |
| Seligson & Co OMX 25 fund | 905,751 | 0.10 |
| Nominee registrations and direct foreign ownership 1) | 269,923,008 | 30.38 |
| Other shareholders in total | 124,880,175 | 14.06 |
| Total number of shares | 888,367,045 | 100.00 |
1) Excluding Schweizerische Nationalbank.
| By shareholder category | % of total amount of shares |
|---|---|
| Finnish shareholders | |
| Corporations | 1.27 |
| Financial and insurance institutions | 1.19 |
| General government | 55.08 |
| Non-profit organisations | 1.42 |
| Households | 10.21 |
| Non-Finnish shareholders | 30.83 |
| Total | 100.00 |
| No. of | % of | % of total amount of |
||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Number of shares owned | shareholders | shareholders | No. of shares | shares |
| 1–100 | 36,689 | 28.83 | 2,002,060 | 0.22 |
| 101–500 | 49,757 | 39.09 | 13,304,536 | 1.50 |
| 501–1,000 | 19,695 | 15.47 | 14,551,606 | 1.64 |
| 1,001–10,000 | 20,023 | 15.73 | 52,398,992 | 5.90 |
| 10,001–100,000 | 1,035 | 0.81 | 22,764,187 | 2.56 |
| 100,001–1,000,000 | 74 | 0.06 | 23,013,521 | 2.59 |
| 1,000,001–10,000,000 | 12 | 0.01 | 41,725,123 | 4.70 |
| over 10,000,000 | 1 | 0.00 | 450,932,988 | 50.76 |
| 127,286 | 100.00 | 620,693,013 | 69.87 | |
| In the joint book-entry account and in special accounts on 31 December | 73,276 | 0.01 | ||
| Nominee registrations | 267,600,756 | 30.12 | ||
| Total | 888,367,045 | 100.00 |
At the end of 2017, the President and CEO and other members of the Fortum Management Team owned 200,667 shares (2016: 315,653) representing approximately 0.02% (2016: 0.04%) of the total shares in the company.
A full description of the shareholdings and interests in long-term incentive schemes of the President and CEO and other members of the Fortum Executive Management Team is shown in Note 10 Employee benefits.
In 2017, the Annual General Meeting decided to authorise the Board of Directors to decide on the repurchase and disposal of the company's own shares up to a maximum number of 20,000,000 shares, which corresponds to approximately 2.25% of all the shares in the company. The authorisation is effective for a period of 18 months from the resolution of the General Meeting. The authorisation had not been used by the end of 2017.
The dividend policy ensures that shareholders receive a fair remuneration for their entrusted capital, supported by the company's long-term strategy that aims at increasing earnings per share and thereby the dividend. When proposing the dividend, the Board of Directors looks at a range of factors, including the macro environment, balance sheet strength as well as future investment plans. Fortum Corporation's target is to pay a stable, sustainable and over time increasing dividend, in the range of 50–80% of earnings per share, excluding one-off items.
The distributable funds of Fortum Corporation as at 31 December 2017 amounted to EUR 5,170,240,554.04 including the profit of the financial period 2017 of EUR 932,525,770.24. The company's liquidity is good and the dividend proposed by the Board of Directors will not compromise the company's liquidity.
The Board of Directors proposes to the Annual General Meeting that a dividend of EUR 1.10 per share be paid for 2017.
Based on the number of registered shares as at 1 February 2018 the total amount of dividend proposed to be paid is EUR 977,203,749.50. The Board of Directors proposes that the remaining part of the distributable funds will be retained in shareholders' equity.
The Annual General Meeting will be held on 28 March 2018 at 11:00 EET at Finlandia Hall in Helsinki.
The dividend for 2017 represents the Board of Directors' proposal for the Annual General Meeting in March 2018. Fortum paid extra dividend of EUR 0.20 per share for the financial year that ended 31 Dec 2014.
| Operating and | Consolidated | Notes | Key figures | Parent company | Proposal for the use of the profit | Auditor's | Operational key figures | Investor |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| financial review | financial statements | 2008–2017 | financial statements | shown on the balance sheet | report | Quarterly financial information | information | |
| Income statement | Statement of comprehensive income | Balance sheet | Statement of changes in total equity | Cash flow statement |
| EUR million | Note | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sales | 5 | 4,520 | 3,632 |
| Other income | 8 | 55 | 34 |
| Materials and services | 9 | -2,301 | -1,830 |
| Employee benefits | 10 | -423 | -334 |
| Depreciation and amortisation | 5, 16, 17 | -464 | -373 |
| Other expenses | 8 | -576 | -485 |
| Comparable operating profit | 5 | 811 | 644 |
| Items affecting comparability | 6 | 347 | -11 |
| Operating profit | 5 | 1,158 | 633 |
| Share of profit of associates and joint ventures | 5, 18 | 148 | 131 |
| Interest expense | -164 | -169 | |
| Interest income | 32 | 30 | |
| Fair value gains and losses on financial instruments | 7 | -12 | -2 |
| Other financial expenses - net | -50 | -29 | |
| Finance costs - net | 11 | -195 | -169 |
| Profit before income tax | 1,111 | 595 | |
| Income tax expense | 12 | -229 | -90 |
| Profit for the period | 882 | 504 | |
| Attributable to: | |||
| Owners of the parent | 866 | 496 | |
| Non-controlling interests | 16 | 8 | |
| 882 | 504 | ||
| Earnings per share for profit attributable to the equity | |||
| owners of the company (EUR per share) 1) | 13 | ||
| Basic | 0.98 | 0.56 |
1) As Fortum currently has no dilutive instruments outstanding, diluted earnings per share is the same as basic earnings per share.
| EUR million | Note | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Comparable operating profit | 811 | 644 | |
| Impairment charges | 6 | 27 | |
| Capital gains and other | 326 | 38 | |
| Changes in fair values of derivatives hedging future cash flow | 7 | 14 | -65 |
| Nuclear fund adjustment | 5 | 1 | -11 |
| Items affecting comparability | 5, 6 | 347 | -11 |
| Operating profit | 1,158 | 633 |
| EUR million | Note | 2017 | 2016 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Profit for the period | 882 | 504 | Components of Consolidated statement of comprehensive income (OCI) are items of income and | |
| expense that are recognized in equity and not recognized in the consolidated income statement. They | ||||
| Other comprehensive income | include unrealized items, such as fair value gains and losses on financial instruments hedging future | |||
| cash flows. These items will be realized in the Consolidated income statement when the underlying hedged items is recognized. OCI also includes gains and losses on fair valuation on available for sale |
||||
| Items that may be reclassified to profit or loss in subsequent periods: |
financial assets, actuarial gains and losses from defined benefit plans, items on comprehensive income in associated companies and translation differences. |
|||
| Cash flow hedges | ||||
| Fair value gains/losses in the period | 22 | -142 | ||
| Transfers to income statement | 76 | -85 | ||
| Transfers to inventory/fixed assets | -4 | -10 | ||
| Deferred taxes | -19 | 51 | Fair valuation of cash flow hedges mainly relates to electricity prices in future cash flows. When electricity price | |
| Net investment hedges | is higher (lower) than the hedging price, the impact on equity is negative (positive). | |||
| Fair value gains/losses in the period | 23 | -2 | ||
| Deferred taxes | -5 | 0 | ||
| Exchange differences on translating foreign operations | 3.6 | -372 | 342 | Translation differences from translation of foreign entities, mainly RUB and SEK. |
| Share of other comprehensive income of associates and joint ventures |
18 | -10 | -9 | |
| Other changes | -2 | 0 | ||
| -291 | 145 | |||
| Items that will not be reclassified to profit or loss in subsequent periods: |
||||
| Actuarial gains/losses on defined benefit plans | 30 | -13 | -7 | |
| Actuarial gains/losses on defined benefit plans in associates and | ||||
| joint ventures | 30 | 6 | 12 | |
| -7 | 5 | |||
| Other comprehensive income for the period, net of deferred taxes | -298 | 150 | ||
| Total comprehensive income for the year | 584 | 654 | ||
| Total comprehensive income attributable to: | ||||
| Owners of the parent | 571 | 639 | ||
| Non-controlling interests | 13 | 15 | ||
| 584 | 654 |
| Operating and | Consolidated | Notes | Key figures | Parent company | Proposal for the use of the profit | Auditor's | Operational key figures | Investor |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| financial review | financial statements | 2008–2017 | financial statements | shown on the balance sheet | report | Quarterly financial information | information | |
| Income statement | Statement of comprehensive income | Balance sheet | Statement of changes in total equity | Cash flow statement |
| EUR million | Note | 31 Dec 2017 | 31 Dec 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|
| ASSETS | |||
| Non-current assets | |||
| Intangible assets | 16 | 1,064 | 467 |
| Property, plant and equipment | 17 | 10,510 | 9,930 |
| Participations in associates and joint ventures | 18 | 1,900 | 2,112 |
| Share in State Nuclear Waste Management Fund | 28 | 858 | 830 |
| Other non-current assets | 19 | 140 | 113 |
| Deferred tax assets | 27 | 73 | 66 |
| Derivative financial instruments | 3 | 281 | 415 |
| Long-term interest-bearing receivables | 20 | 1,010 | 985 |
| Total non-current assets | 15,835 | 14,918 | |
| Current assets | |||
| Inventories | 21 | 216 | 233 |
| Derivative financial instruments | 3 | 240 | 130 |
| Short-term interest-bearing receivables | 20 | 395 | 395 |
| Income tax receivables | 27 | 172 | 290 |
| Trade and other receivables | 22 | 997 | 844 |
| Deposits and securities (maturity over three months) | 715 | 3,475 | |
| Cash and cash equivalents | 3,182 | 1,679 | |
| Liquid funds | 23 | 3,897 | 5,155 |
| Total current assets | 5,918 | 7,046 | |
| Total assets | 21,753 | 21,964 |
| EUR million | Note | 31 Dec 2017 | 31 Dec 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|
| EQUITY | |||
| Equity attributable to owners of the parent | |||
| Share capital | 24 | 3,046 | 3,046 |
| Share premium | 73 | 73 | |
| Retained earnings | 9,875 | 10,369 | |
| Other equity components | 54 | -29 | |
| Total | 13,048 | 13,459 | |
| Non-controlling interests | 25 | 239 | 84 |
| Total equity | 13,287 | 13,542 | |
| LIABILITIES | |||
| Non-current liabilities | |||
| Interest-bearing liabilities | 26 | 4,119 | 4,468 |
| Derivative financial instruments | 3 | 214 | 262 |
| Deferred tax liabilities | 27 | 819 | 616 |
| Nuclear provisions | 28 | 858 | 830 |
| Other provisions | 29 | 100 | 116 |
| Pension obligations | 30 | 102 | 76 |
| Other non-current liabilities | 31 | 175 | 179 |
| Total non-current liabilities | 6,388 | 6,546 | |
| Current liabilities | |||
| Interest-bearing liabilities | 26 | 766 | 639 |
| Derivative financial instruments | 3 | 200 | 396 |
| Trade and other payables | 32 | 1,112 | 841 |
| Total current liabilities | 2,078 | 1,876 | |
| Total liabilities | 8,466 | 8,422 | |
| Total equity and liabilities | 21,753 | 21,964 |
| Operating and | Consolidated | Notes | Key figures | Parent company | Proposal for the use of the profit | Auditor's | Operational key figures | Investor |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| financial review | financial statements | 2008–2017 | financial statements | shown on the balance sheet | report | Quarterly financial information | information | |
| Income statement | Statement of comprehensive income | Balance sheet | Statement of changes in total equity | Cash flow statement |
| Share capital | Share premium |
Retained earnings | Other equity components | Owners of the parent |
Non controlling interests |
Total equity | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EUR million | Note | Retained earnings and other funds |
Translation of foreign operations |
Cash flow hedges |
Other OCI items |
OCI items associated companies and joint ventures |
|||||
| BS Total equity 31 December 2016 | 3,046 | 73 | 12,186 | -1,817 | -115 | 58 | 27 | 13,459 | 84 | 13,542 | |
| Net profit for the period | 866 | 866 | 16 | 882 | |||||||
| Translation differences | -369 | 1 | 1 | -1 | -369 | -3 | -372 | ||||
| Other comprehensive income | -9 | 74 | 11 | -2 | 73 | 0 | 74 | ||||
| Total comprehensive income for the period | 857 | -369 | 75 | 11 | -3 | 571 | 13 | 584 | |||
| Cash dividend | 13 | -977 | -977 | -2 | -979 | ||||||
| Other | -4 | -4 | 145 | 141 | |||||||
| BS Total equity 31 December 2017 | 3,046 | 73 | 12,062 | -2,187 | -40 | 70 | 24 | 13,048 | 239 | 13,287 | |
| Total equity 31 December 2015 | 3,046 | 73 | 12,663 | -2,156 | 74 | 67 | 27 | 13,794 | 69 | 13,863 | |
| Net profit for the period | 496 | 496 | 8 | 504 | |||||||
| Translation differences | 339 | -2 | 1 | -3 | 335 | 7 | 342 | ||||
| Other comprehensive income | 1 | -186 | -10 | 3 | -192 | -192 | |||||
| Total comprehensive income for the period | 497 | 339 | -188 | -9 | 0 | 639 | 15 | 654 | |||
| Cash dividend | 13 | -977 | -977 | -977 | |||||||
| Other | 3 | 3 | -1 | 2 | |||||||
| BS Total equity 31 December 2016 | 3,046 | 73 | 12,186 | -1,817 | -115 | 58 | 27 | 13,459 | 84 | 13,542 |
Translation of financial information from subsidiaries in foreign currency is done using average rate for the income statement and end rate for the balance sheet. The exchange rate differences occurring from translation to EUR are booked to equity. Translation differences impacted equity attributable to owners of the parent company with EUR -369 million during 2017 (2016: 335). Translation differences are mainly related to RUB and SEK. Part of this translation exposure has been hedged and the foreign currency hedge result, amounting to EUR 28 million (2016: 5), is included in the other OCI items.
For information regarding exchange rates used, see Note 1 Accounting policies. For information about translation exposure see Note 3.6 Interest rate risk and currency risk.
The impact on equity attributable to owners of the parent from fair valuation of cash flow hedges, EUR 75 million (2016: -188), mainly relates to cash flow hedges hedging electricity price for future transactions. When electricity price is lower/higher than the hedging price, the impact on equity is positive/negative.
Non-controlling interests have increased with EUR 155 million during 2017 mainly due to the acquisition of Fortum Oslo Varme AS which is consolidated as a subsidiary with 50% non-controlling interest. See also Note 38 Acquisitions and disposals.
| Operating and | Consolidated | Notes | Key figures | Parent company | Proposal for the use of the profit | Auditor's | Operational key figures | Investor |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| financial review | financial statements | 2008–2017 | financial statements | shown on the balance sheet | report | Quarterly financial information | information | |
| Income statement | Statement of comprehensive income | Balance sheet | Statement of changes in total equity | Cash flow statement |
| EUR million Note |
2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|
| Cash flow from operating activities | ||
| Profit for the period from continuing operations | 882 | 504 |
| Adjustments: | ||
| Income tax expenses | 229 | 90 |
| Finance costs - net | 195 | 169 |
| Share of profit of associates and joint ventures | -148 | -131 |
| Depreciation and amortisation | 464 | 373 |
| Operating profit before depreciations (EBITDA) | 1,623 | 1,006 |
| Items affecting comparability | -347 | 11 |
| Net release of CSA provision | 0 | -2 |
| Comparable EBITDA | 1,275 | 1,015 |
| Non-cash flow items | -76 | -49 |
| Interest received | 35 | 39 |
| Interest paid | -187 | -214 |
| Dividends received | 58 | 54 |
| Realised foreign exchange gains and losses | -83 | 110 |
| Income taxes paid | -83 | -216 |
| Other items | -28 | -18 |
| Funds from operations | 912 | 723 |
| Change in working capital | 81 | -102 |
| Net cash from operating activities | 993 | 621 |
| Cash flow from investing activities | ||
| Capital expenditures 5, 16, 17 |
-657 | -599 |
| Acquisitions of shares | -972 | -695 |
| Proceeds from sales of fixed assets | 8 | 10 |
| Divestments of shares | 741 | 39 |
| Shareholder loans to associated companies and joint ventures | 43 | -117 |
| Change in cash collaterals | -3 | -359 |
| Change in other interest-bearing receivables | 34 | 20 |
| Net cash used in investing activities | -807 | -1,701 |
| EUR million | Note | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cash flow before financing activities | 187 | -1,080 | |
| Cash flow from financing activities | |||
| Proceeds from long-term liabilities | 35 | 32 | |
| Payments of long-term liabilities | -543 | -934 | |
| Change in short-term liabilities | 68 | -97 | |
| Dividends paid to the owners of the parent | 13 | -977 | -977 |
| Other financing items | -12 | -8 | |
| Net cash used in financing activities | -1,428 | -1,984 | |
| Total net increase(+)/decrease(-) in liquid funds | -1,241 | -3,064 | |
| Liquid funds at the beginning of the year | 5,155 | 8,202 | |
| Foreign exchange differences in liquid funds | -16 | 18 | |
| Liquid funds at the end of the period | 23 | 3,897 | 5,155 |
Realised foreign exchange gains and losses relate mainly to financing of Fortum's Russian and Swedish subsidiaries and the fact that the Group's main external financing currency is EUR. The foreign exchange gains and losses arise from rollover of foreign exchange contracts hedging these internal loans as major part of the forwards are entered into with short maturities i.e. less than twelve months.
Capital expenditures in cash flow do not include not yet paid investments. Capitalised borrowing costs are presented in interest paid.
| Operating and | Consolidated | Notes | Key figures | Parent company | Proposal for the use of the profit | Auditor's | Operational key figures | Investor |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| financial review | financial statements | 2008–2017 | financial statements | shown on the balance sheet | report | Quarterly financial information | information | |
| Income statement | Statement of comprehensive income | Balance sheet | Statement of changes in total equity | Cash flow statement |
| EUR million | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|
| Net debt 1 January | -48 | -2,195 |
| Foreign exchange rate differences | -15 | -70 |
| Comparable EBITDA | 1,275 | 1,015 |
| Non-cash flow items | -76 | -49 |
| Paid net financial costs | -199 | -29 |
| Income taxes paid | -83 | -216 |
| Change in working capital | 81 | -102 |
| Capital expenditures | -657 | -599 |
| Acquisitions | -972 | -695 |
| Divestments | 749 | 49 |
| Shareholder loans to associated companies | 43 | -117 |
| Change in other interest-bearing receivables | 31 | -340 |
| Dividends | -977 | -977 |
| Other financing activities | -17 | -8 |
| Net cash flow (- increase in net debt) | -802 | -2,065 |
| Fair value change of bonds, amortised cost valuation, | ||
| acquired debt and other | 248 | 152 |
| Net debt 31 December | 988 | -48 |
| EUR million | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|
| Change in settlements for futures, decrease(+)/increase(-) | 141 | -138 |
| Change in interest-free receivables, decrease(+)/increase(-) | -94 | 92 |
| Change in inventories, decrease(+)/increase(-) | 19 | 14 |
| Change in interest-free liabilities, decrease(-)/increase(+) | 15 | -70 |
| CF Total | 81 | -102 |
In Fortum's cash flow statement the daily cash settlements for futures are shown as change in working capital whereas the changes in cash collaterals for forwards are included in cash flow from investing activities. In the end of 2016 Nasdaq's market making for forwards ended and the trading moved from forwards with cash collaterals to futures with daily cash settlements. The cash collaterals are included in the short-term interest-bearing receivables, see Note 20 Interest-bearing receivables.
| EUR million | Note | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Capital expenditure | 5, 16, 17 | 690 | 591 |
| Change in not yet paid investments, decrease(+)/increase(-) | -17 | 24 | |
| Capitalised borrowing costs | -16 | -16 | |
| CF Total | 657 | 599 |
Capital expenditures for intangible assets and property, plant and equipment were in 2017 EUR 690 million (2016: 591). Capital expenditure in cash flow in 2017 EUR 657 million (2016: 599) is including payments related to capital expenditure made in previous year i.e. change in trade payables related to investments EUR -17 million (2016: 24) and excluding capitalised borrowing costs EUR -16 million (2016: -16), which are presented in interest paid.
See also information about the investments by segments and countries in Note 5 Segment reporting and the investment projects by segment in Note 17.2 Capital expenditure.
Acquisition of shares, net of cash acquired, amounted to EUR 972 million during 2017 (2016: 695). Acquisition of shares during 2017 include mainly the acquisition of subsidiary shares in Hafslund Markets AS and Hafslund Varme AS (renamed as Fortum Oslo Varme AS) including the City of Oslo's waste-to-energy company Klemetsrudanlegget AS (renamed as Fortum Oslo Varme KEA AS) as well as associated company shares in Hafslund Produksjon Holding AS. During 2017 Fortum also acquired 100% of the shares in three Norwergian wind park companies, Russian solar power companies and other smaller companies. Fortum also invested in the wind investment fund owned 50/50 by Fortum and RUSNANO. For further information see Note 38 Acquisitions and disposals.
| EUR million | Note | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Proceeds from sales of subsidiaries, net of cash disposed | 38 | 54 | 6 |
| Proceeds from sales of associates and joint ventures | 18, 38 | 687 | 34 |
| CF Total | 741 | 39 |
Proceeds from sales of subsidiaries during 2017 include mainly the sale of the Polish gas infrastructure company DUON Dystrybucja S.A. that was acquired as part of the acquisition of the electricity and gas sales company Grupa DUON S.A. (currently Fortum Markets Polska S.A.) in 2016. Proceeds from sales of associated companies and joint ventures during 2017 include the sale of Fortum's 34.1% stake in Hafslund ASA. For further information see Note 38 Acquisitions and disposals.
40
Key figures 2008–2017 Notes
Parent company financial statements Proposal for the use of the profit shown on the balance sheet
Auditor's report
Operational key figures Quarterly financial information Investor information
Basis of preparation Risks Income statement Balance sheet Off balance sheet items Group structure and related parties
Fortum Corporation (the Company) is a Finnish public limited liability company with its domicile in Espoo, Finland. Fortum's shares are traded on Nasdaq Helsinki.
The operations of Fortum Corporation and its subsidiaries (together the Fortum Group) focus on the Nordic and Baltic countries, Russia and Poland. Fortum's activities cover generation and sale of electricity, generation, distribution and sale of heat, and energy-related expert services.
These financial statements were approved by the Board of Directors on 1 February 2018.
The consolidated financial statements of the Fortum Group have been prepared in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) and IFRIC Interpretations as adopted by the European Union. The financial statements also comply with Finnish accounting principles and corporate legislation.
The consolidated financial statements have been prepared under the historical cost convention, except for available-for-sale financial assets, financial assets and financial liabilities (including derivative instruments) at fair value through profit and loss and items hedged at fair value.
In the Consolidated income statement Comparable operating profit-key figure is presented to better reflect the Group's business performance when comparing results for the current period with previous periods.
Items affecting comparability are disclosed as a separate line item. The following items are included in "Items affecting comparability":
in the Group's performance management.
An asset or a liability is classified as current when it is expected to be realised in the normal operating cycle or within twelve months after the balance sheet date or it is classified as financial assets or liabilities held at fair value through profit or loss. Liquid funds are classified as current assets.
All other assets and liabilities are classified as non-current assets and liabilities.
The consolidated financial statements comprise of the parent company, subsidiaries, joint ventures and associated companies.
The Fortum Group was formed in 1998 by using the pooling-of-interests method for consolidating Fortum Power and Heat Oy and Fortum Oil and Gas Oy (the latter demerged to Fortum Oil Oy and Fortum Heat and Gas Oy 1 May 2004). In 2005 Fortum Oil Oy (current Neste Oyj) was separated from Fortum by distributing 85% of its shares to Fortum's shareholders and by selling the remaining 15%. This means that the acquisition cost of Fortum Power and Heat Oy and Fortum Heat and Gas Oy has been eliminated against the share capital of the companies. The difference has been entered as a decrease in shareholders' equity.
Subsidiaries are defined as companies in which Fortum has control. Control exists when Fortum is exposed to, or has rights to, variable returns from its involvement with the entity and has the ability to affect those returns through its power over the entity.
The acquisition method of accounting is used to account for the acquisition of subsidiaries. The cost of an acquisition is measured as the aggregate of fair value of the assets given and liabilities incurred or assumed at the date of exchange, plus costs directly attributable to the acquisition. Identifiable assets acquired and liabilities assumed in a business combination are measured initially at their fair values at the acquisition date, irrespective of the extent of any minority interest. The excess of the cost of acquisition over the fair value of the Group's share of the identifiable net assets acquired is recorded as goodwill. If the cost of acquisition is less than the fair value of the net assets of the subsidiary acquired, the difference is recognised directly in the income statement.
Subsidiaries are fully consolidated from the date on which control is transferred to the Group and are no longer consolidated from the date that control ceases.
Intercompany transactions, balances and unrealised gains on transactions between Group companies are eliminated. Unrealised losses are also eliminated unless the transaction provides evidence of an impairment of the asset transferred. Where necessary, subsidiaries' accounting policies have been changed to ensure consistency with the policies the Group has adopted.
Operating and financial review Consolidated financial statements
Notes
Key figures 2008–2017
information
Associated companies are entities over which the Group has significant influence but not control, generally accompanying a shareholding of between 20% and 50% of the voting rights. The Group's interests in associated companies are accounted for using the equity method of accounting. Joint ventures are arrangements in which the Group has joint control. Joint ventures are accounted for
31 December 2017.
1.3.2 Associates
using the equity method of accounting.
Non-controlling interests in subsidiaries are identified separately from the equity of the owners of the parent company. The non-controlling interests are initially measured at the non-controlling interests' proportionate share of the fair value of the acquiree's identifiable net assets. Subsequent to acquisition, the carrying amount of non-controlling interests is the amount of those interests at initial recognition plus the non-controlling interests' share of subsequent changes in equity.
Items included in the financial statements of each of the Group's entities are measured using the currency of the primary economic environment in which the entity operates ('the functional currency'). The consolidated financial statements are presented in euros, which is the Company's functional and presentation currency.
Transactions denominated in foreign currencies are translated using the exchange rate at the date of the transaction. Receivables and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies outstanding on the closing date are translated using the exchange rate quoted on the closing date. Exchange rate differences have been entered in the income statement. Net conversion differences relating to financing are entered under financial income or expenses, except when deferred in equity as qualifying cash flow hedges. Translation differences on available-for-sale financial assets are included in Other equity components section of the equity.
The income statements of subsidiaries, whose measurement and reporting currencies are not euros, are translated into the Group reporting currency using the average exchange rates for the year based on the month-end exchange rates, whereas the balance sheets of such subsidiaries are translated using the exchange rates on the balance sheet date. On consolidation, exchange differences arising from the translation of the net investment in foreign entities, and of borrowings and other currency instruments designated as hedges of such investments, are taken to equity. When a foreign operation is sold, such exchange differences are recognised in the income statement as part of the gain or loss on sale. Goodwill and fair value adjustments arising on the acquisition of a foreign entity are treated as assets and liabilities of the foreign entity and translated at the closing rate.
The balance sheet date rate is based on the exchange rate published by the European Central Bank for the closing date. The average exchange rate is calculated as an average of each month's ending rate from the European Central Bank during the year and the ending rate of the previous year.
| Average rate | Balance sheet date rate | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Currency | 2017 | 2016 | 31 Dec 2017 | 31 Dec 2016 | ||
| Sweden | SEK | 9,6392 | 9.4496 | 9,8438 | 9.5525 | |
| Norway | NOK | 9,3497 | 9.2888 | 9,8403 | 9.0863 | |
| Poland | PLN | 4,2556 | 4.3659 | 4,1770 | 4.4103 | |
| Russia | RUB | 66,0349 | 73.8756 | 69,3920 | 64.3000 |
The Group's interests in associated companies and joint ventures are accounted for by the equity method. Associates and joint ventures, whose measurement and reporting currencies are not euro, are translated into the Group reporting currency using the same principles as for subsidiaries, see 1.4.3 Group companies.
| Operating and | Consolidated | Notes | Key figures | Parent company | Proposal for the use of the profit | Auditor's | Operational key figures | Investor |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| financial review | financial statements | 2008–2017 | financial statements | shown on the balance sheet | report | Quarterly financial information | information | |
| Basis of preparation Risks Income statement Balance sheet Off balance sheet items Group structure and related parties |
Fortum describes the other accounting principles in conjunction with the relevant note information. The table below lists the significant accounting policies and the note where they are presented as well as the relevant IFRS standard.
| Accounting principle | Note | IFRS standard | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Segment reporting | 5 Segment reporting | IFRS 8 | |
| Revenue recognition | 5 | Segment reporting and | IAS 18 |
| 22 | Trade and other receivables | ||
| Government grants | 17 Property, plant and equipment | IAS 20 | |
| Share-based payments | 10 Employee benefits | IFRS 2 | |
| Income taxes | 27 Income taxes in balance sheet | IAS 12 | |
| Joint arrangements | 18 Participations in associated companies and joint ventures |
IFRS 11, IAS 28, IFRS 12 |
|
| Investments in associates | 18 Participations in associated companies and joint ventures |
IAS 28, IFRS 12 | |
| Other shares and participations |
14 Financial assets and liabilities by categories | IAS 32, IAS 36, IAS 39 |
|
| Intangible assets | 16 Intangible assets | IAS 38 | |
| Tangible assets | 17 Property, plant and equipment | IAS 16, IAS 36, IAS 40 |
|
| Leases | 33 Lease commitments | IAS 17 | |
| Inventories | 21 Inventories | IAS 2 | |
| Earnings per share | 13 Earnings and dividend per share | IAS 33 | |
| Pensions and similar obligations |
30 Pension obligations | IAS 19 | |
| Decommissioning obligation |
28 Nuclear related assets and liabilities | IFRIC 5 | |
| Provisions | 29 Other provisions | IAS 37 | |
| Contingent liabilities | 35 Pledged assets and contingent liabilities | IAS 37 | |
| Financial instruments | 14 | Financial assets and liabilities by categories and | IAS 32, IAS 39, |
| 15 | Financial assets and liabilities by fair value hierarchy | IFRS 7 | |
| Liquid funds | 23 Liquid funds | IAS 7 | |
| Borrowings | 26 Interest-bearing liabilities | IAS 39 |
Fortum has adopted the following new or amended standards on 1 January 2017:
| Narrow-scope yearly amendments | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nature of change | The amendments primarily remove inconsistencies, provide additional guidance and clarify wording of standards. There are separate transitional provisions for each standard. |
||||
| Date of adoption | 1 January 2017 | ||||
| Impact | In connection to the disclosure initiative project, IAS 7 was amended to require additional disclosures on the movement of liabilities. Fortum presents a reconciliation of |
||||
| liabilities arising from financing activities in Note 26. Impacts of the other amendments are not material in Fortum's financial statements. |
Fortum will apply the following new or amended standards and interpretations starting
from 1 January 2018 or later:
| IFRS 15 Revenue from Contracts with Customers | |
|---|---|
| Nature of change | New standard. The standard focuses on revenue recognition models and will replace IAS 11 and IAS 18. |
| Date of adoption | 1 January 2018 |
| Impact | Fortum has completed the analysis of the significant business areas and has not identified any material changes from IFRS 15 implementation. Analysis includes the following main steps: |
| • Identification and assessment of the main revenue streams, • Determining key areas of potential differences between old and new revenue recognition principles and |
|
| • Reviewing a sample of contracts. | |
| The conclusions requiring the greatest degree of management judgement are as follows: |
|
| • Electricity sales to wholesale market: Physical electricity trades to Nord Pool or other wholesale markets are made either during the same day or day before the delivery and the duration of the contract is thus very short. The transaction price is the spot price and there are no variable elements. Electricity sales continue to be recognized upon delivery and hence there are no changes identified compared to the current recognition principles. |
|
• District heating: In many areas the district heating service covers both the distribution and sale of heat. Even if heat is produced by a third party, Fortum is usually responsible for delivering the whole service and is acting as a principal for the heat sales as well. Fortum has concluded that the distribution and sale of heat are not separate performance obligations and are both covered by the promise to stand-ready to supply heat to the customer. Also the fees charged for connecting the end customer to the district heat network are part of the same performance obligation. The fees charged from the customer generally comprise a fixed monthly charge and a variable component that is determined based on the volume of heat supplied. In accordance to the IFRS 15 principles, the fixed charge and the variable heat volume charge are allocated and recognised in line with the fees chargeable from the customer. In Russia, Baltics and Poland there are also areas, where Fortum operates only the heat production facilities while some third party is responsible for the distribution of heat. In these areas the performance obligation is to supply heat. There are no changes identified compared to the current revenue recognition principles.
IFRS 15 will change the treatment of sales commission costs for obtaining new customers, which are currently mostly expensed. In the future the sales commissions shall be capitalized as intangible assets and depreciated over the expected contract term. Implementation of IFRS 15 will thus impact the timing and classification of expenses, but the impact to Fortum Comparable operating profit is not expected to be material.
Further details on the impact will be disclosed in the Q1/2018 interim report. Fortum will use the transition relief for not to restate the comparative information at the date of initial application.
| Operating and | Consolidated | Notes | Key figures | Parent company | Proposal for the use of the profit | Auditor's | Operational key figures | Investor |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| financial review | financial statements | 2008–2017 | financial statements | shown on the balance sheet | report | Quarterly financial information | information | |
| Basis of preparation Risks Income statement Balance sheet Off balance sheet items Group structure and related parties |
| Nature of change | New standard. The standard has new requirements for the classification and measurement of financial assets and liabilities and hedge accounting and it will replace |
|---|---|
| IAS 39. Additionally, it introduces a new impairment model for expected credit losses. | |
| Date of adoption | 1 January 2018 |
| Impact | Fortum is finalising the implementation and testing phase including model validations, process and system updates and preparation of the new disclosures including possible opening balance sheet adjustments. The interpretations taken are: • Classification and measurement of financial assets - Most financial assets will be classified under "Held-to-Collect" business model and accounted for as amortised cost when they meet the SPPI criteria. TVO shareholder loan meets the criteria for equity investment and it will be reclassified. • Fortum's commodity derivative hedging will benefit from the possibility to apply hedge accounting for one or several risk components separately or in aggregation. In the Nordic area Fortum considers system and electricity price area differential (EPAD) products perfect hedges for corresponding electricity price risk components. This will reduce the volatility in Fortum's profit and loss currently recognized as items affecting comparability. Vast majority of the non-hedge accounted electricity derivatives in December will qualify for hedge accounting under IFRS 9. • Implementation of expected credit loss ("ECL") model is completed. Fortum has implemented counterparty specific ECL models to be used on individual contract basis for deposits, shareholder loans and trade receivables with large customers whereas portfolio models will be used for trade receivables with consumers and small business customers. Fortum has prepared analysis based on historical data, which indicates no material impacts. Actual impacts will fluctuate due to seasonality of the business. |
initial application.
IFRS 16 Leases Nature of change New standard regarding lease accounting that will replace IAS 17. The new lease standard will result in almost all leases being recognised on the balance sheet, as the distinction between operating and finance lease is removed. Date of adoption 1 January 2019 Impact Currently under IAS 17, lessees recognize leases either as operating leases or finance leases. The new standard no longer distinguishes between operating and finance leases from a lessees point of view, and most right-of-use assets are recognized in the balance sheet. For lessors, there are no significant changes. In brief, IFRS 16 requirements contain the following: • A lessee shall recognize all leases, except for short-term and low value leases, in the balance sheet. • For lessees, both the value of the right-of-use asset and the corresponding liability shall be recognized in the balance sheet. IFRS 16 is effective for financial periods starting on 1 January 2019 or later. The European Union endorsed the use of the standard on 31 October 2017. Currently, Fortum has mainly operating leases with varying lease terms and prolongation rights. The majority of the operating leases are for the use of land and office buildings. Total future lease obligations amounted to EUR 160 million at the end of the reporting period (Dec 31 2016: 74). Hence, the impacts of the standard to the consolidated financial statements are not expected to be material. The IFRS 16 analysis is on-going and will be completed during 2018. Analysis include:
No major issues have been identified so far. Fortum plans to apply the modified retrospective method, which means the comparative figures will not be restated.
39 40
Parent company financial statements Proposal for the use of the profit shown on the balance sheet
Auditor's report
Operational key figures Quarterly financial information Investor information
Basis of preparation Risks Income statement Balance sheet Off balance sheet items Group structure and related parties
The preparation of IFRS consolidated financial statements requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities existing at the balance sheet date as well as the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period.
Estimates and judgements are continually evaluated and are based on historical experience and other factors, including expectations of future events that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances. Actual results and timing may differ from these estimates.
The table below is listing the areas where management's accounting estimates and judgements are most critical to reported results and financial position. The table is also showing where to find more information about above-mentioned estimates and judgements.
| Critical accounting estimates and judgements | Note |
|---|---|
| Assigned values and useful lives determined for intangible assets and property, plant and equipment acquired in a business combination |
16 Intangible assets |
| Assumptions related to impairment testing of property, plant and equipment and intangible assets as well as associated companies and joint ventures |
16 Intangible assets |
| Judgement used when assessing the nature of Fortum's interest in its investees and when considering the classification of Fortum's joint arrangements as well as commitments arising from these arrangements |
18 Participations in associated companies and joint ventures |
| Assumptions and estimates regarding future tax consequences |
27 Income taxes in balance sheet 36 Legal actions and official proceedings |
| Assumptions made to determine long-term cash flow forecasts of estimated costs for provision related to nuclear production |
28 Nuclear related assets and liabilities |
| Assumptions made when estimating provisions | 29 Other provisions |
| Assumptions used to determine future pension obligations |
30 Pension obligations |
Risk management objectives, principles and framework including governance, organisation and processes as well as description of risks i.e. strategic, financial and operational risks are described in the Risk management part in the Operating and financial review (OFR).
Fortum's business is exposed to fluctuations in prices and volume of commodities used in the production and sales of energy products. The main exposure is toward electricity prices and volumes, prices of emissions and prices and availability of fuels. Fortum hedges its exposure to commodity market risks in accordance with annually approved Hedging Guidelines, Strategies and Mandates.
Electricity price risk is hedged by entering into electricity derivatives contracts, primarily on the Nordic power exchange, Nasdaq Commodities. The main objective of hedging is to reduce the effect of electricity price volatility on earnings. Hedging strategies cover several years in the short to medium term and are executed within approved mandates. These hedging strategies are continuously evaluated as electricity and other commodity market prices, the hydrological balance and other relevant parameters change. Hedging of the Generation segment's power sales is performed in EUR on a Nordic level covering both Finland and Sweden, and the currency component of these hedges in the Swedish entity is currently not hedged.
In Russia, electricity prices and capacity sales are the main sources of market risk. The electricity price is highly correlated with the gas price and prices are fixed through bilateral agreements limiting exposure.
Fortum's sensitivity to electricity market price is dependent on the hedge level for a given time period. As per 31 December 2017, approximately 70% of the Generation segment's estimated Nordic power sales volume was hedged for the calendar year 2018 and approximately 40% for the calendar year 2019. Assuming no changes in generation volumes, hedge ratios or cost structure a 1 EUR/MWh change in the market price of electricity would affect Fortum's 2018 comparable operating profit by approximately EUR 14 million and for 2019 by approximately EUR 27 million. The volume used in this sensitivity analysis is 45 TWh which includes the electricity generation sold to the spot market in Sweden and Finland in the Generation segment without minority owner's shares of electricity or other pass-through sales, and excluding the volume of Fortum's coal-condensing generation. This volume is heavily dependent on price level, the hydrological situation, the length of annual maintenance periods and availability of power plants. Sensitivity is calculated only for electricity market price movements. Hydrological conditions, temperature, CO2 allowance prices, fuel prices and the import/export situation all affect the electricity price on short-term basis and effects of individual factors cannot be separated.
Sensitivity analysis shows the sensitivity arising from financial electricity derivatives as defined in IFRS 7. These derivatives are used for hedging purposes within Fortum. Sensitivities are calculated based on 31 December 2017 (31 December 2016) position. Positions are actively managed in the day-to-day business operations and therefore the sensitivities vary from time to time. Sensitivity analysis includes only the market risks arising from derivatives i.e. the underlying physical electricity sales and purchases are not included. Sensitivity is calculated with the assumption that electricity forward quotations in Nasdaq OMX Commodities Europe and in EEX would change 1 EUR/MWh for the period Fortum has derivatives.
| +/- 1 EUR/MWh change in electricity forward quotations, EUR million | Effect | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Effect on Profit before income tax | -/+ | 22 | 18 |
| Effect on Equity | -/+ | 28 | 27 |
The tables below disclose the Group's electricity derivatives used mainly for hedging electricity price risk. The fair values represent the values disclosed in the balance sheet.
See also Note 14 Financial assets and liabilities by categories for accounting principles and basis for fair value estimations and Note 7 Fair value changes of derivatives and underlying items in income statement.
| Volume, TWh | Fair value, EUR million | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Under 1 year |
1–5 years |
Over 5 years |
Total | Positive Negative | Net | ||
| Electricity derivatives | 26 | 24 | 0 | 50 | 360 | 519 | -159 |
| Total | 360 | 519 | -159 | ||||
| Netting against | |||||||
| electricity exchanges 1) | -234 | -234 | 0 | ||||
| Total | 126 | 285 | -159 |
| Volume, TWh | Fair value, EUR million | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Under 1 year |
1–5 years |
Over 5 years |
Total | Positive Negative | Net | ||
| Electricity derivatives | 24 | 21 | 0 | 45 | 491 | 711 | -220 |
| Total | 491 | 711 | -220 | ||||
| Netting against electricity exchanges 1) |
-335 | -335 | 0 | ||||
| Total | 156 | 376 | -220 |
Amounts in the table are fair values.
| 2017 | 2016 | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EUR million | Under 1 year |
1–5 years |
Over 5 years |
Total | Under 1 year |
1–5 years |
Over 5 years |
Total |
| Electricity derivatives, | ||||||||
| liabilities | 162 | 123 | 0 | 285 | 238 | 136 | 2 | 376 |
| Electricity derivatives, assets | 90 | 35 | 0 | 126 | 88 | 67 | 1 | 156 |
| Other commodity derivatives, | ||||||||
| liabilities | 13 | 3 | 0 | 16 | 18 | 3 | 0 | 21 |
| Other commodity derivatives, | ||||||||
| assets | 36 | 6 | 0 | 43 | 18 | 4 | 0 | 22 |
Exposure to fuel prices is limited due to Fortum's flexible generation capacity, which allows for switching between different fuels according to prevailing market conditions. In some cases, the fuel price risk can be transferred to the customer. The remaining exposure to fuel price risk is mitigated through fixedprice physical delivery contracts or derivative contracts, such as coal, gas and oil derivatives included in the table above as part of "Other commodity derivatives".
Part of Fortum's power and heat generation is subject to requirements of emission trading schemes. Fortum hedges its exposure to these prices and volumes through the use of CO2 futures. Most of these CO2 futures are own use contracts valued at cost and some are treated as derivatives in the accounts included in the table above as part of "Other commodity derivatives".
Fortum's business is capital intensive and the Group has a diversified loan portfolio mainly consisting of long-term financing denominated in EUR and SEK. Long-term financing is primarily raised by issuing bonds under Fortum's Euro Medium Term Note programme as well as through bilateral and syndicated loan facilities from a variety of different financial institutions.
Financing is primarily raised on parent company level and distributed internally through various internal financing arrangements. For example Fortum's Russian operations are mainly financed via intra group internal long-term RUB denominated loans. The internal RUB loan receivables are hedged via external forward contracts offsetting the currency exposure for the internal lender. On 31 December 2017, 90% (2016: 96%) of the Group's total external financing was raised by the parent company Fortum Corporation.
On 31 December 2017, the total interest-bearing debt was EUR 4,885 million (2016: 5,107) and the interest-bearing net debt was EUR 988 million (2016: -48).
| Operating and | Consolidated | Notes | Key figures | Parent company | Proposal for the use of the profit | Auditor's | Operational key figures | Investor |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| financial review | financial statements | 2008–2017 | financial statements | shown on the balance sheet | report | Quarterly financial information | information | |
| Basis of preparation | Risks | Income statement | Balance sheet | Off balance sheet items Group structure and related parties |
Fortum manages liquidity and refinancing risks through a combination of cash positions and committed credit facility agreements with its core banks. The Group shall at all times have access to cash, marketable securities and unused committed credit facilities including overdrafts, to cover all loans maturing within the next twelve-month period. However, cash/marketable securities and unused committed credit facilities shall always amount to at least EUR 500 million.
On 31 December 2017, loan maturities for the coming twelve-month period amounted to EUR 766 million (2016: 639). Liquid funds amounted to EUR 3,897 million (2016: 5,155) and the total amount of committed and undrawn credit facilities amounted to EUR 1,800 million (2016: 1,963), excluding committed credit facilities for Fortum's offer for Uniper shares. In relation to offer for Uniper shares Fortum Corporation had commitments from 10 relationship banks to provide credit facilities at the request of Fortum in an aggregate amount of up to EUR 12,000 million.
| EUR million | 2017 |
|---|---|
| 2018 | 766 |
| 2019 | 812 |
| 2020 | 71 |
| 2021 | 538 |
| 2022 | 1,068 |
| 2023 and later | 1,630 |
| Total | 4,885 |
1) In addition Fortum has received EUR 113 million based on Credit Support Annex agreements with several counterparties. This amount has been booked as a short-term liability.
| Drawn | Available | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| EUR million | Total facility | amount | amount |
| Liquid funds | |||
| Cash and cash equivalents | 3,182 | ||
| Deposits and securities over 3 months | 715 | ||
| Total | 3,897 | ||
| of which in Russia (PAO Fortum) | 246 | ||
| Committed credit lines | |||
| EUR 1,750 million syndicated credit facility | 1,750 | - | 1,750 |
| Bilateral overdraft facilities | 50 | - | 50 |
| Total 1) | 1,800 | 0 | 1,800 |
| Debt programmes (uncommitted) | |||
| Fortum Corporation, CP programme EUR 500 million | 500 | - | 500 |
| Fortum Corporation, CP programme SEK 5,000 million | 508 | - | 508 |
| Fortum Corporation, EMTN programme EUR 8,000 million | 8,000 | 2,943 | 5,057 |
| Total | 9,008 | 2,943 | 6,065 |
1) Excluding committed credit facilities for Fortum's offer for Uniper shares
| Drawn | Available | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| EUR million | Total facility | amount | amount |
| Liquid funds | |||
| Cash and cash equivalents | 1,679 | ||
| Deposits and securities over 3 months | 3,475 | ||
| Total | 5,155 | ||
| of which in Russia (PAO Fortum) | 105 | ||
| Committed credit lines | |||
| EUR 1,750 million syndicated credit facility | 1,750 | - | 1,750 |
| Bilateral overdraft facilities | 213 | - | 213 |
| Total | 1,963 | - | 1,963 |
| Debt programmes (uncommitted) | |||
| Fortum Corporation, CP programme EUR 500 million | 500 | - | 500 |
| Fortum Corporation, CP programme SEK 5,000 million | 523 | - | 523 |
| Fortum Corporation, EMTN programme EUR 8,000 million | 8,000 | 3,329 | 4,671 |
| Total | 9,023 | 3,329 | 5,694 |
Liquid funds amounted to EUR 3,897 million (2016: 5,155), including PAO Fortum's bank deposits amounting to EUR 231 million (2016: 103). See also Note 23 Liquid funds.
Amounts disclosed below are non-discounted expected cash flows (future interest payments and amortisations) of interest-bearing liabilities and interest rate and currency derivatives.
| 2017 | 2016 | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EUR million | Under 1 year |
1–5 years |
Over 5 years |
Total | Under 1 year |
1–5 years |
Over 5 years |
Total | |
| Interest-bearing liabilities | 895 | 2,723 | 1,869 | 5,487 | 765 | 2,307 | 2,601 | 5,673 | |
| Interest rate and currency derivatives liabilities |
3,210 | 1,005 | 4 | 4,219 | 2,255 | 1,119 | 20 | 3,394 | |
| Interest rate and currency derivatives recievables |
-3,319 | -1,092 | -1 | -4,413 | -2,131 | -1,291 | -27 | -3,449 | |
| Total | 785 | 2,636 | 1,871 | 5,293 | 889 | 2,136 | 2,594 | 5,619 |
Interest-bearing liabilities include loans from the State Nuclear Waste Management Fund and Teollisuuden Voima Oyj of EUR 1,129 million (2016: 1,094). These loans are renewed yearly and the related interest payments are calculated for ten years in the table above.
For further information regarding loans from the State Nuclear Waste Management Fund and Teollisuuden Voima Oyj, see Note 28 Nuclear related assets and liabilities.
Fortum risk policy states that the average duration of the debt portfolio shall always be kept within a range of 12 and 36 months and that the flow risk i.e. changes in interest rates shall not affect the net interest payments of the Group by more than EUR 50 million for the next rolling 12-month period. Within these mandates, strategies are evaluated and developed in order to find an optimal balance between risk and financing cost.
On 31 December 2017, the average duration of the debt portfolio (including derivatives) was 1.5 years (2016: 1.7). Approximately 65% (2016: 59%) of the debt portfolio was on a floating rate basis or fixed rate loans maturing within the next 12-month period. The effect of one percentage point change in interest rates on the present value of the debt portfolio was EUR 71 million on 31 December 2017 (2016: 87). The flow risk, measured as the difference between the base case net interest cost estimate and the worst-case scenario estimate for Fortum's debt portfolio for the coming 12 months, was EUR 4 million (2016: 3).
The average interest rate for the portfolio consisting mainly of EUR and SEK loans was 2.4% at the balance sheet date (2016: 2.1%). Part of the external loans EUR 773 million (2016: 805) have been swapped to RUB and the average interest cost for these loans, including cost for hedging the RUB, was 9,5% at the balance sheet date (2016: 11.4%). The average interest rate on loans and derivatives on 31 December 2017 was 3.6% (2016: 3.5%). Average cumulative interest rate on loans and derivatives for 2017 was 3.6% (2016: 3.5%).
The average interest rate on deposits and securities excluding Russian deposits on 31 December 2017 was -0.27% (2016: -0.01%). Liquid funds held by PAO Fortum amounted to EUR 246 million (2016: 105) and the average interest rate for this portfolio was 6.1% at the balance sheet date.
Fortum's policy is to hedge major transaction exposures on a local level in the reporting currency of each legal entity in order to avoid exchange differences in the profit and loss statement. These exposures are mainly hedged with forward contracts. An exception is the Generation segment's hedging of power sales in Sweden where the currency component is currently not hedged.
Translation exposures in the Fortum Group are generally not hedged as the majority of these assets are considered to be long-term strategic holdings. In Fortum this means largely entities operating in Sweden, Russia, Norway and Poland, whose base currency is not euro.
The currency risk relating to transaction exposures is measured using Value-at-Risk (VaR) for a one-day period at 95% confidence level. Translation exposures relating to net investments in foreign entities are measured using a five-day period at 95% confidence level. The limit for transaction exposure is VaR EUR 5 million. On 31 December 2017 the open transaction, excluding Generation segment's EURSEK exposure and translation exposures were EUR 13 million (2016: 2) and EUR 8,212 million (2016: 7,213) respectively. The VaR for the transaction exposure was EUR 0 million (2016: 0) and VaR for the translation exposure was EUR 98 million (2016: 96).
| 2017 | 2016 | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EUR million | Net position | Hedge | Open Net position | Hedge | Open | |
| RUB | 589 | -589 | 0 | 677 | -677 | 0 |
| SEK | 277 | -264 | 13 | 532 | -531 | 1 |
| PLN | 310 | -310 | 0 | 226 | -226 | 0 |
| NOK | 451 | -451 | 0 | -72 | 72 | 0 |
| INR | 117 | -117 | 0 | 116 | -116 | 0 |
| USD | -118 | 118 | 0 | -98 | 98 | 0 |
| Other | -41 | 41 | 0 | -20 | 20 | 0 |
| Total | 1,585 | -1,572 | 13 | 1,361 | -1,359 | 2 |
Transaction exposure is defined as already contracted or forecasted foreign exchange dependent items and cash flows. Transaction exposure is divided into balance sheet exposure and cash flow exposure. Balance sheet exposure reflects currency denominated assets and liabilities for example loans, deposits and accounts receivable/payable in currencies other than the company's base currency. Cash flow exposure reflects future forecasted or contracted currency flows in foreign currency deriving from business activities such as sales, purchases or investments. Net conversion differences from transaction
| Operating and | Consolidated | Notes | Key figures | Parent company | Proposal for the use of the profit | Auditor's | Operational key figures | Investor |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| financial review | financial statements | 2008–2017 | financial statements | shown on the balance sheet | report | Quarterly financial information | information | |
| Basis of preparation | Risks | Income statement | Balance sheet | Off balance sheet items Group structure and related parties |
exposure are entered under financial income or expense when related to financial items or when related to accounts receivable/payable entered under items included in operating profit. Conversion differences related to qualifying cash flow hedges are deferred to equity.
Fortum's policy is to hedge balance sheet exposures in order to avoid exchange rate differences in the income statement. The Group's balance sheet exposure mainly relates to financing of non-euro subsidiaries and the fact that the Group's main external financing currency is EUR. For derivatives hedging this balance exposure Fortum does not apply hedge accounting, because they have a natural hedge in the income statement.
Contracted cash flow exposures shall be hedged to reduce volatility in future cash flows. These hedges normally consist of currency derivative contracts, which are matched against the underlying future cash flow according to maturity. Fortum has currency cash flow hedges both with and without hedge accounting treatment under IFRS. Those currency cash flow hedges, which do not qualify for hedge accounting are mainly hedging electricity derivatives. Unrealised hedges create volatility in the operating profit.
| 2017 | 2016 | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EUR million | Net Investment |
Hedge | Open | Net Investment |
Hedge | Open |
| RUB | 2,673 | -173 | 2,500 | 2,603 | -132 | 2,471 |
| SEK | 4,769 | -1,087 | 3,682 | 4,747 | -837 | 3,910 |
| NOK | 1,600 | - | 1,600 | 410 | - | 410 |
| PLN | 294 | - | 294 | 282 | - | 282 |
| Other | 136 | - | 136 | 141 | - | 141 |
| Total | 9,472 | -1,260 | 8,212 | 8,183 | -970 | 7,213 |
Translation exposure position includes net investments in foreign subsidiaries and associated companies. On consolidation, exchange differences arising from the translation of the net investment in foreign entities are taken to equity. The net effect of exchange differences on equity attributable to equity holders mainly from RUB and SEK was EUR -369 million in 2017 (2016: 335). Part of this translation exposure has been hedged and the foreign currency hedge result amounted to EUR 28 million in 2017 (2016: 5).
| 2017 Notional amount Remaining lifetimes |
2017 Fair value |
2016 Fair value |
||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EUR million | Under 1 year | 1–5 years | Over 5 years | Total | Positive | Negative | Net | Positive | Negative | Net |
| Forward foreign exchange contracts | 2,864 | 266 | 3,130 | 56 | 19 | 37 | 26 | 130 | -103 | |
| Interest rate swaps | 305 | 3,421 | 102 | 3,827 | 205 | 90 | 115 | 269 | 127 | 142 |
| Interest rate and currency swaps | 311 | 580 | 892 | 92 | 3 | 89 | 71 | 5 | 66 | |
| Total | 3,480 | 4,267 | 102 | 7,849 | 353 | 112 | 241 | 366 | 261 | 105 |
| Of which long-term | 238 | 88 | 151 | 343 | 121 | 222 | ||||
| Of which short-term | 114 | 24 | 90 | 23 | 140 | -117 |
Fortum is exposed to credit risk whenever there is a contractual obligation with an external counterparty.
Credit risk exposures relating to financial derivative instruments are often volatile. Although the majority of commodity derivatives are cleared through exchanges, derivatives contracts are also entered into directly with external counterparties. Such contracts are limited to high-credit-quality counterparties active on the financial or commodity markets. Currency and interest rate derivative counterparties are limited to investment grade banks and financial institutions. ISDA Master agreements, which include netting clauses and in some cases Credit Support Annex agreements, are in place with most of these counterparties. Commodity derivative counterparties are limited to those considered to be creditworthy. Master agreements, such as ISDA, FEMA and EFET, which include netting clauses, are in place with the majority of the counterparties.
Due to the financing needs and management of liquidity, Fortum has counterparty credit exposure toward a number of banks and financial institutions. This includes exposure to the Russian financial sector in terms of deposits with financial institutions as well as to banks that provide guarantees for suppliers and contracting parties. Deposits in Russia have been concentrated to the most creditworthy state-owned or controlled banks. Limits with banks and financial institutions are monitored so that exposures can be adjusted as ratings or the financial situation changes, and Fortum is following the development of economic sanctions against Russia as part of the monitoring process.
Credit risk relating to customers is spread across a wide range of industrial counterparties, small businesses and private individuals over a range of geographic regions. The majority of exposure is to the Nordic market, Poland and Russia. The risk of non-payment in the electricity and heat sales business in Russia is higher than in the Nordic market.
Amounts disclosed below are presented by counterparties for interest-bearing receivables including bank deposits and derivative financial instruments recognised as assets.
| 2017 Carrying |
of which | 2016 Carrying |
of which | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EUR million | amount | past due | amount | past due |
| Investment grade receivables | ||||
| Deposits, commercial papers and cash in bank | ||||
| accounts | 3,348 | - | 4,663 | - |
| Fair values of interest rate and currency derivatives | 353 | - | 366 | - |
| Fair values of electricity and other commodity | ||||
| derivatives | 56 | - | 5 | - |
| Total investment grade receivables | 3,757 | - | 5,034 | - |
| Energy exchange receivables Fair value of derivatives on Nasdaq OMX |
||||
| Commodities Europe | 37 | - | 61 | - |
| Fair value of derivatives on European Energy | ||||
| Exchange AG | 2 | - | 1 | - |
| Fair value of derivatives on the Polish Power | ||||
| Exchange | 13 | - | 0 | - |
| Total energy exchange receivables | 52 | - | 62 | - |
| Associated companies and joint venture | ||||
| receivables | ||||
| Loan receivables | 864 | - | 886 | - |
| Finance lease receivable | 41 | - | 0 | - |
| Fair values of electricity and other commodity derivatives |
9 | - | 14 | - |
| Total associated companies and joint venture | ||||
| receivables | 914 | - | 900 | - |
| Other receivables | ||||
| Investments in commercial papers | 249 | - | 275 | - |
| Russian deposits with non-investment grade banks | 141 | - | 103 | - |
| Restricted cash mainly given as collateral for | ||||
| commodity exchanges | 363 | - | 360 | - |
| Receivable from SIBUR related to divested shares of | ||||
| OOO Tobolsk CHP | 102 | - | 131 | - |
| Loan and other interest bearing receivables | 35 | - | 3 | - |
| Fair values of electricity and other commodity derivatives |
51 | - | 96 | - |
| Total other receivables | 941 | - | 968 | - |
| Total | 5,664 | - | 6,964 | - |
| Operating and financial review |
Consolidated | financial statements | Notes | Key figures 2008–2017 |
Parent company financial statements |
Proposal for the use of the profit shown on the balance sheet |
Auditor's report |
Operational key figures Quarterly financial information |
Investor information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Basis of preparation | Risks | Income statement | Balance sheet | Off balance sheet items Group structure and related parties |
The following tables indicate how bank deposits, commercial papers and fair values of derivatives are distributed by rating class.
| 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|
| - | - |
| 324 | 995 |
| 2,835 | 3,437 |
| 189 | 231 |
| 3,348 | 4,663 |
| 141 | 103 |
| - | - |
| - | - |
| 141 | 103 |
| Moody's | ||
|---|---|---|
| Government or municipality | - | - |
| Fortum Rating 5 – Lowest Risk | 249 | 275 |
| Fortum Rating 4 – Low Risk | - | - |
| Fortum Rating 3 – Normal Risk | - | - |
| Fortum Rating 2 – High Risk | - | - |
| Fortum Rating 1 – Highest Risk | - | - |
| No rating | - | - |
| Total non-rated counterparties | 249 | 275 |
| Total | 3,738 | 5,040 |
In addition, cash in other bank accounts totalled EUR 159 million on 31 December 2017 (2016: 115). See Note 23 Liquid funds
| 2017 | 2016 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Netted | Netted | |||
| EUR million | Receivables | amount 1) Receivables | amount 1) | |
| Counterparties with external credit rating from Standard & Poor's and/or Moody's Investment grade ratings |
||||
| AAA | - | - | - | - |
| AA+/AA/AA- | 51 | 30 | 11 | - |
| A+/A/A- | 292 | 100 | 259 | 76 |
| BBB+/BBB/BBB- | 10 | 9 | 96 | 31 |
| Total investment grade ratings | 353 | 140 | 366 | 107 |
| Total associated companies and joint ventures | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Counterparties without external credit rating from Standard & Poor's and/or Moody's |
- | - | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 353 | 140 | 366 | 107 |
1) The netted amount includes the cash received in accordance with Credit Support Annex agreements EUR 113 million (2016: 135).
| 2017 | 2016 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EUR million | Receivables | Netted | amount Receivables | Netted amount |
| Counterparties with external credit rating from Standard & Poor's and/or Moody's Investment grade ratings |
||||
| AAA | - | - | - | - |
| AA+/AA/AA- | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| A+/A/A- | 53 | 53 | 4 | 3 |
| BBB+/BBB/BBB- | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 |
| Total investment grade ratings | 56 | 55 | 5 | 3 |
| Non-investment grade ratings | ||||
| BB+/BB/BB- | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
| B+/B/B- | 0 | 0 | - | - |
| Below B- | - | - | - | - |
| Total non-investment grade ratings | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
| Total associated companies and joint ventures | 9 | 0 | 14 | 7 |
| 2017 | 2016 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EUR million | Receivables | Netted | amount Receivables | Netted amount |
| Counterparties without external credit rating from Standard & Poor's and/or Moody's |
||||
| Government or municipality | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Fortum Rating 5 – Lowest risk | 15 | 10 | 34 | 28 |
| Fortum Rating 4 – Low risk | 19 | 12 | 39 | 29 |
| Fortum Rating 3 – Normal risk | 16 | 12 | 22 | 19 |
| Fortum Rating 2 – High risk | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Fortum Rating 1 – Highest risk | - | - | 0 | 0 |
| No rating | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Total non-rated counterparties | 51 | 35 | 95 | 77 |
| Total | 117 | 90 | 115 | 87 |
For derivatives, the receivable is the sum of the positive fair values, i.e. the gross amount. Netted amount includes negative fair values where a valid netting agreement is in place with the counterparty. When the netted amount is less than zero, it is not included. In cases where a parent company guarantee is in place, the exposure is shown on the issuer of the guarantee.
All counterparties for currency and interest rate derivatives and the majority of counterparties for bank deposits have an external rating from Standard & Poor's and/or Moody's credit agencies. The above rating scale is for Standard & Poor's rating categories. For those counterparties only rated by Moody's, the rating has been translated to the equivalent Standard and Poor's rating category. For counterparties rated by both Standard & Poor's and Moody's, the lower of the two ratings is used.
In the commodity derivatives and commercial paper market, there are a number of counterparties not rated by Standard & Poor's or Moody's. For these counterparties, Fortum assigns an internal rating. The internal rating is based on external credit ratings from other credit agencies. The rating from Bisnode is used for Nordic counterparties and for other counterparties the rating from Dun & Bradstreet is used. Governments and municipal companies are typically not rated, and are shown separately. This rating category does not include companies owned by governments or municipalities. Counterparties that have not been assigned a rating by the above listed credit agencies are in the "No rating" category.
Financial targets give guidance on Fortum's view of the company's long-term value creation potential, its growth strategy and business activities. The long-term over-the-cycle financial targets (published in Feb 2016) are Return on capital employed, ROCE at least 10% and Comparable net debt to EBITDA around 2.5 times.
In November 2016 the strategy execution plan was detailed in order to enable profit growth and improved cash flow. According to that detailed plan the redeployment of cash and the execution of Fortum's strategy will take place in two phases, and a significant part of the redeployment was targeted to take place during 2016–2017. The goal for the first phase is to maximise cash flow through redeployment and the goal for the second phase is to secure Fortum's longer-term competitiveness.
Following the earlier Ekokem and Hafslund transactions in September 2017 Fortum announced that it has signed a transaction agreement under which E.ON had the right to decide to tender its 46.65% shareholding in Uniper SE into Fortum's public takeover offer.
The investment in Uniper delivers on Fortum's previously announced capital redeployment strategy and investment criteria. The offer will be financed with existing cash resources and committed credit facilities. Fortum has received as of 16 January 2018 in the offer 46.93% including E.ON's shares in Uniper which corresponds to a commitment of billion 3.78 euro. As a result of this transaction, Fortum's leverage will rise above our given guidance for net debt/EBITDA level of around 2.5x. Over time however, Fortum expects its cash generation in combination with the dividend from Uniper to reduce this level towards the stated target.
The dividend policy ensures that shareholders receive a fair remuneration for their entrusted capital, supported by the company's long-term strategy that aims at increasing earnings per share and thereby the dividend. When proposing the dividend, the Board of Directors looks at a range of factors, including the macro environment, balance sheet strength as well as future investment plans. Fortum Corporation's target is to pay a stable, sustainable and over time increasing dividend, in the range of 50–80% of earnings per share, excluding one-off items.
In September 2017, Standard & Poor's and Fitch Ratings placed both Fortum's long-term and short-term credit ratings on credit watch negative on possible adverse impacts of the planned Uniper investment. In January 2018, Standard & Poor's downgraded Fortum's long-term credit rating from BBB+ to BBB with a Negative Outlook due to the Uniper investment. The short-term rating was affirmed at level A-2. Fitch Ratings rates Fortum's long-term credit rating at level BBB+ and the short-term rating at level F2.
| EUR million Note |
2017 | 2016 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Interest-bearing liabilities | 26 | 4,885 | 5,107 |
| BS Less: Liquid funds | 23 | 3,897 | 5,155 |
| Net debt | 988 | -48 | |
| Operating profit | 1,158 | 633 | |
| Add: Depreciation and amortisation | 464 | 373 | |
| EBITDA | 1,623 | 1,006 | |
| Less: Items affecting comparability | 347 | -11 | |
| Less: Net release of CSA provision | - | 2 | |
| Comparable EBITDA | 1,275 | 1,015 | |
| Comparable net debt/EBITDA | 0.8 | 0.0 |
40
Parent company financial statements Proposal for the use of the profit shown on the balance sheet
Auditor's report
Operational key figures Quarterly financial information Investor information
Basis of preparation Risks Income statement Balance sheet Off balance sheet items Group structure and related parties
5 Segment reporting
Revenue comprises the fair value consideration received or receivable at the time of delivery of products and/or upon fulfilment of services. Revenue is shown net of rebates, discounts, value-added tax and selective taxes such as electricity tax. Revenue is recognised as follows:
Sale of electricity, heat and cooling as well as sale of recycled materials is recognised at the time of delivery. The sale to industrial and commercial customers and to end-customers is recognised based on the value of the volume supplied, including an estimated value of the volume supplied to customers between the date of their last meter reading and year-end.
Physical energy sales and purchase contracts are accounted for on accrual basis based on expected purchase, sale and usage requirements.
Fees paid by the customer when connected to the gas, heat or cooling network are recognised as income to the extent that the fee does not cover future commitments. If the connection fee is linked to the contractual agreement with the customer, the income is recognised over the period of the agreement with the customer.
Fees paid by the customer when connected to district heating network in Finland were refundable until 2013. These connection fees have not been recognised in the income statement and are included in other liabilities in the balance sheet.
Revenue from waste treatment services is recognised over time, when the underlying treatment is performed.
Contract revenue is recognised under the percentage of completion method to determine the appropriate amount to recognise as revenue and expenses in a given period. The stage of completion is measured by reference to the contract costs incurred up to the closing date as a percentage of total estimated costs for each contract.
Generation segment sells its production to Nord Pool and Consumer Solutions buys its electricity from Nord Pool. Eliminations of sales include eliminations of sales and purchases with Nord Pool that are netted on group level on an hourly basis and posted either as revenue or cost depending on if Fortum is a net seller or net buyer during any particular hour. Inter-segment sales, expenses and results for the different business segments are affected by intra-group deliveries, which are eliminated on consolidation. Inter-segment transactions are based on commercial terms.
Fortum has reorganised its operating structure as of 1 March 2017. The City Solutions division was divided into two divisions: City Solutions and Consumer Solutions. City Solutions comprises heating and cooling, waste-to-energy, biomass and other circular economy solutions. Consumer Solutions comprises electricity sales in the Nordics, electricity sales and gas sales in Poland, as well as Nordic customer services (previously reported under the Other segment). The business divisions are: Generation, City Solutions, Consumer Solutions, Russia, and Other, which includes the two development units, M&A and Solar & Wind Development, Technology and New Ventures as well as corporate functions.
Fortum discloses segment information in a manner consistent with internal reporting to Fortum,s Board of Directors and to Fortum Executive Management led by the President and CEO. Fortum has segments based on type of business operations, combined with one segment based on geographical area. Fortum,s reportable segments under IFRS are the business divisions Generation, City Solutions, Consumer Solutions and Russia. Fortum has restated its 2016 comparison segment reporting figures in accordance with the new organisation structure. The restated and previously communicated quarterly information for 2016 were published on 11 April 2017 and can be found in the Interim reports section in Fortum's webpage.
Fortum's segment information discloses the financial measurements used in financial target setting and forecasting, management,s follow up of financial performance and allocation of resources in the group,s performance management process. These measurements, such as Comparable operating profit and Comparable return on net assets, have been used consistently since 2005.
Items affecting comparability are disclosed separately in Fortum,s income statement to support the understanding of business performance when comparing results between periods. Items classified as
| Operating and | Consolidated | Notes | Key figures | Parent company | Proposal for the use of the profit | Auditor's | Operational key figures | Investor | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| financial review | financial statements | 2008–2017 | financial statements | shown on the balance sheet | report | Quarterly financial information | information | ||
| Basis of preparation Risks Income statement Balance sheet Off balance sheet items Group structure and related parties |
Items affecting comparability include accounting effects from valuation according to IFRS that are not arising from the performance of the business operations. Such items include fair valuation of financial derivatives hedging future cash-flows where hedge accounting is not applied according to IAS 39 and effects from the accounting of Fortum,s part of the Finnish Nuclear Waste Fund where the asset in the balance sheet cannot exceed the related provisions according to IFRIC interpretation 5.
The business performance of the operations cannot be compared from one period to another without adjusting for one-time items relating to capital gains, major impairment related items and transaction costs arising from acquisitions. Therefore such items have also been treated as Items affecting comparability. From 2016 onwards transaction costs arising from acquisitions of subsidiary shares are included in capital gains and other within items affecting comparability. According to IFRS 3 transaction costs related to the acquisitions of subsidiary shares are recognised in the income statement.
Consolidation by segment is based on the same principles as for the Group as a whole. See definition of the segment information in Definition of financial key figures.
1
| Operating and | Consolidated | Notes | Key figures | Parent company | Proposal for the use of the profit | Auditor's | Operational key figures | Investor |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| financial review | financial statements | 2008–2017 | financial statements | shown on the balance sheet | report | Quarterly financial information | information | |
| Basis of preparation | Risks | Income statement | Balance sheet | Off balance sheet items Group structure and related parties |
| Generation 1) | City Solutions 1) | Consumer Solutions | Russia | Other | Total | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EUR million Note |
2017 | 2016 | 2017 | 2016 | 2017 | 2016 | 2017 | 2016 | 2017 | 2016 | 2017 | 2016 |
| External sales | 1,662 | 1,643 | 996 | 780 | 1,094 | 666 | 1,101 | 896 | 35 | 31 | 4,888 | 4,016 |
| Internal sales | 15 | 15 | 19 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 67 | 61 | 103 | 79 |
| Netting of Nord Pool transactions 2) | -367 | -384 | ||||||||||
| Eliminations 2) | -103 | -79 | ||||||||||
| IS Sales | 1,677 | 1,657 | 1,015 | 782 | 1,097 | 668 | 1,101 | 896 | 102 | 92 | 4,520 | 3,632 |
| Comparable EBITDA | 603 | 527 | 262 | 186 | 57 | 55 | 438 | 312 | -83 | -64 | 1,275 | 1,015 |
| Net release of CSA provision | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 | ||||||||
| IS Depreciation and amortisation | -125 | -110 | -163 | -121 | -16 | -7 | -142 | -123 | -18 | -13 | -464 | -373 |
| IS Comparable operating profit | 478 | 417 | 98 | 64 | 41 | 48 | 296 | 191 | -102 | -77 | 811 | 644 |
| Impairment charges 6 |
6 | 27 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 27 |
| Capital gains and other 6 |
1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 35 | 322 | 2 | 326 | 38 |
| Changes in fair values of derivatives hedging future cash-flow 6, 7 |
15 | -96 | 3 | 22 | -4 | 11 | 0 | 0 | 0 | -2 | 14 | -65 |
| Nuclear fund adjustment 6, 28 |
1 | -11 | 1 | -11 | ||||||||
| IS Items affecting comparability 6 |
23 | -79 | 4 | 22 | -2 | 11 | 0 | 35 | 322 | 0 | 347 | -11 |
| IS Operating profit | 501 | 338 | 102 | 86 | 39 | 59 | 295 | 226 | 221 | -77 | 1,158 | 633 |
| IS Share of profit of associated companies and joint ventures 18, 28 |
-1 | -34 | 80 | 76 | 0 | 0 | 31 | 38 | 38 | 51 | 148 | 131 |
| IS Finance costs - net | -195 | -169 | ||||||||||
| IS Income taxes | -229 | -90 | ||||||||||
| IS Profit for the year | 882 | 504 |
1) Sales, both internal and external, include effects from realised hedging contracts. Effect on sales can be negative or positive depending on the average contract price and realised spot price.
2) Netting and eliminations include eliminations of internal sales and netting of Nord Pool transactions. Sales and purchases with Nord Pool, EUR -367 million, are netted on Group level on an hourly basis and posted either as revenue or cost depending on if Fortum is a net seller or net buyer during any particular hour.
| Operating and | Consolidated | Notes | Key figures | Parent company | Proposal for the use of the profit | Auditor's | Operational key figures | Investor |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| financial review | financial statements | 2008–2017 | financial statements | shown on the balance sheet | report | Quarterly financial information | information | |
| Basis of preparation Risks Income statement Balance sheet Off balance sheet items Group structure and related parties |
| Generation City Solutions |
Consumer Solutions | Russia | Other | Total | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EUR million Note |
2017 | 2016 | 2017 | 2016 | 2017 | 2016 | 2017 | 2016 | 2017 | 2016 | 2017 | 2016 |
| Non-interest-bearing assets | 6,097 | 6,206 | 3,517 | 2,672 | 923 | 348 | 2,812 | 2,967 | 452 | 240 | 13,801 | 12,432 |
| BS Participations in associated companies and joint ventures 18, 28 |
785 | 711 | 611 | 573 | 0 | 0 | 472 | 436 | 32 | 392 | 1,900 | 2,112 |
| Eliminations | -19 | -18 | ||||||||||
| Total segment assets | 6,882 | 6,917 | 4,128 | 3,245 | 923 | 348 | 3,284 | 3,402 | 483 | 632 | 15,682 | 14,526 |
| Interest-bearing receivables 20 |
1,406 | 1,380 | ||||||||||
| BS Deferred tax assets 27 |
73 | 66 | ||||||||||
| Other assets | 696 | 838 | ||||||||||
| BS Liquid funds | 3,897 | 5,155 | ||||||||||
| Total assets | 21,753 | 21,964 | ||||||||||
| Segment liabilities | 1,210 | 1,102 | 400 | 371 | 285 | 194 | 124 | 119 | 207 | 117 | 2,227 | 1,903 |
| Eliminations | -19 | -18 | ||||||||||
| Total segment liabilities | 2,208 | 1,885 | ||||||||||
| BS Deferred tax liabilities 27 |
819 | 616 | ||||||||||
| Other liabilities | 554 | 814 | ||||||||||
| Total liabilities included in capital employed | 3,581 | 3,315 | ||||||||||
| Interest-bearing liabilities 26 |
4,885 | 5,107 | ||||||||||
| BS Total equity | 13,287 | 13,542 | ||||||||||
| Total equity and liabilities | 21,753 | 21,964 |
| Generation | City Solutions | Consumer Solutions | Russia | Other | Total | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EUR million | Note | 2017 | 2016 | 2017 | 2016 | 2017 | 2016 | 2017 | 2016 | 2017 | 2016 | 2017 | 2016 |
| Gross investments in shares | 18, 38 | 90 | 7 | 386 | 698 | 486 | 117 | 125 | 0 | 39 | 22 | 1,125 | 844 |
| Capital expenditure | 16, 17 | 174 | 196 | 170 | 109 | 7 | 3 | 152 | 201 | 187 | 83 | 690 | 591 |
| of which capitalised borrowing costs | 3 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 10 | 4 | 2 | 16 | 16 | |
| Gross divestments of shares | 38 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 33 | 55 | 1 | 0 | 127 | 687 | 0 | 742 | 161 |
| Comparable net assets by segments, EUR million | Comparable return on net assets, % | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2017 | 2016 | 2017 | 2016 | |
| Generation | 5,672 | 5,815 | 8.4 | 6.9 |
| City Solutions | 3,728 | 2,873 | 5.5 | 5.9 |
| Consumer Solutions | 638 | 154 | 11.7 | 44.3 |
| Russia | 3,161 | 3,284 | 10.1 | 8.0 |
| Other | 276 | 514 | -13.3 | -6.1 |
| Operating and | Consolidated | Notes | Key figures | Parent company | Proposal for the use of the profit | Auditor's | Operational key figures | Investor |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| financial review | financial statements | 2008–2017 | financial statements | shown on the balance sheet | report | Quarterly financial information | information | |
| Basis of preparation | Risks | Income statement | Balance sheet | Off balance sheet items Group structure and related parties |
| Generation | City Solutions | Consumer Solutions | Russia | Other | Total | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2017 | 2016 | 2017 | 2016 | 2017 | 2016 | 2017 | 2016 | 2017 | 2016 | 2017 | 2016 | |
| Number of employees 31 Dec | 1,035 | 979 | 1,907 | 1,701 | 1,543 | 961 | 3,495 | 3,745 | 805 | 722 | 8,785 | 8,108 |
| Average number of employees | 1,036 | 1,064 | 1,807 | 1,529 | 1,180 | 877 | 3,710 | 3,814 | 774 | 711 | 8,507 | 7,994 |
The Group,s operating segments operate mainly in the Nordic countries, Russia, Poland and other parts of the Baltic Rim area. Generation operates mainly in Finland and Sweden, Consumer Solutions operates mainly in Nordic countries and Poland, whereas City Solutions operates in all of these geographical areas except Russia. Other countries are mainly Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania and India. The home country is Finland.
The information below is disclosing sales by product area as well as sales by the country in which the customer is located. Assets, capital expenditure and personnel are reported where the assets and personnel are located. Participations in associates and joint ventures are not divided by location since the companies concerned can have business in several geographical areas.
| EUR million | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|
| Power sales excluding indirect taxes | 3,089 | 2,587 |
| Heating sales | 782 | 648 |
| Other sales | 649 | 398 |
| IS Total | 4,520 | 3,632 |
Heating sales include sale of delivered heat and transmission of heat.
Due to the large number of customers and the variety of its business activities, there is no individual customer whose business volume is material compared with Fortum,s total business volume.
| EUR million | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|
| Nordic | 2,827 | 2,258 |
| Russia | 1,102 | 899 |
| Poland | 452 | 355 |
| Other countries | 139 | 120 |
| IS Total | 4,520 | 3,632 |
The Nordic power production is not split by countries since Nordic power production is mainly sold through Nord Pool.
| EUR million | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|
| Finland | 179 | 173 |
| Sweden | 104 | 91 |
| Norway | 46 | 11 |
| Russia | 152 | 201 |
| Poland | 92 | 59 |
| Other countries | 115 | 56 |
| Total | 690 | 591 |
| EUR million | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|
| Finland | 3,882 | 3,958 |
| Sweden | 4,304 | 4,341 |
| Norway | 1,533 | 27 |
| Russia | 2,812 | 2,967 |
| Poland | 559 | 513 |
| Other countries and eliminations | 692 | 608 |
| Non-interest bearing assets | 13,781 | 12,414 |
| BS Participations in associates and joint ventures | 1,900 | 2,112 |
| Total | 15,682 | 14,526 |
| 2017 | 2016 | |
|---|---|---|
| Finland | 2,165 | 2,029 |
| Sweden | 968 | 724 |
| Norway | 654 | 43 |
| Russia | 3,494 | 3,745 |
| Poland | 827 | 894 |
| Other countries | 677 | 673 |
| Total | 8,785 | 8,108 |
| EUR million | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|
| Impairment charges | 6 | 27 |
| Capital gains and other | 326 | 38 |
| Changes in fair values of derivatives hedging future cash flow | 14 | -65 |
| Nuclear fund adjustments | 1 | -11 |
| IS Total | 347 | -11 |
Items affecting comparability are not included in Comparable operating profit. Comparable operating profit is presented to better reflect the Group,s business performance when comparing results for the current period with previous periods. Items affecting comparability are disclosed separately in Fortum,s income statement as it is deemed necessary for the purposes of understanding the financial performance when comparing the results.
| EUR million | Segment | Country | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Impairment charges | ||||
| Reversal of provision for early closure of units 1 and 2 in OKG AB |
Generation | Sweden | 22 | |
| Reversal of dismantling provision for the Finnish coal-fired power plant Inkoo Generation |
Finland | 6 | 5 | |
| Total | 6 | 27 | ||
| Capital gains and other | ||||
| Hafslund ASA, associated company | Other | Norway | 324 | |
| Transaction costs from Hafslund acquisition |
Other | Norway | -4 | |
| OOO Tobolsk CHP, subsidiary | Russia | Russia | 35 | |
| AS Eesti Gaas, joint venture | City Solutions | Estonia | 11 | |
| Transaction costs from Ekokem acquisition |
City Solutions | Finland | -12 | |
| Other non-recurring items | 6 | 4 | ||
| Total | 326 | 38 |
Changes in the fair values of financial derivative instruments hedging future cash flows that do not qualify for hedge accounting are recognised in items affecting comparability. This is done to improve the understanding of the financial performance when comparing results from one period to another.
Nuclear fund adjustment includes effects from the accounting principle of Fortum,s part of the State Nuclear Waste Management Fund where the assets in the balance sheet cannot exceed the nuclear related provisions according to IFRIC 5. As long as the Fund is overfunded from an IFRS perspective, the effects to the operating profit from this adjustment will be positive if the provisions increase more than the Fund and negative if actual value of the fund increases more than the provisions.
For more information regarding disposals of shares, see Note 38 Acquisitions and disposals. For more information regarding fair value changes of derivatives, see Note 7 Fair value changes of derivatives and underlying items in income statement.
For more information regarding nuclear waste management, see Note 28 Nuclear related assets and liabilities.
Key figures 2008–2017 Notes
Parent company financial statements Proposal for the use of the profit shown on the balance sheet
Auditor's report
Operational key figures Quarterly financial information Investor information
Basis of preparation Risks Income statement Balance sheet Off balance sheet items Group structure and related parties
Fair value changes in operating profit presented below are arising from financial derivatives hedging future cash flows where hedge accounting is not applied according to IAS 39 and the ineffectiveness from cash flow hedges.
Fair value changes of currency derivatives in net financial expenses are arising mainly from balance sheet hedges without hedge accounting status according to IAS 39, because they are natural hedges of loans and receivables. Fair value change of interest rate hedges without hedge accounting is EUR -7 million (2016: -9). The net effect of fair value changes of hedging derivative and hedged bonds are EUR 0 million (2016: 0).
| EUR million | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|
| In operating profit | ||
| Fair value changes from derivatives not getting hedge accounting status | ||
| Electricity derivatives | -20 | -43 |
| Currency derivatives | -1 | 2 |
| Other commodity derivatives | 25 | -2 |
| Ineffectiveness from cash flow hedges | 11 | -23 |
| Total effect in operating profit | 14 | -65 |
| In finance costs | ||
| Exchange gains and losses on loans and receivables 1) | -51 | 143 |
| Fair value changes of derivatives not getting hedge accounting status | ||
| Cross currency interest rate derivatives 1) | 6 | 12 |
| Foreign currency derivatives 1) | 47 | -156 |
| Rate difference on forward contracts | -4 | 7 |
| Currency derivatives | 49 | -137 |
| Interest rate derivatives | -7 | -9 |
| Fair value change of hedging derivatives in fair value hedge | ||
| relationship | -31 | 11 |
| Fair value change of hedged items in fair value hedge relationship | 31 | -11 |
| Total 2) | 42 | -146 |
| Total effect in finance costs | -10 | -3 |
| Total effect on profit before income tax | 4 | -68 |
Revenue from activities outside normal operations is reported in other income. This includes recurring items such as rental income and non-recurring items such as insurance compensation.
Research and development costs are recognised as expense as incurred and included in other expenses in the income statement. If development costs will generate future income, they are capitalised as intangible assets and depreciated over the period of the income streams.
| EUR million | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|
| Rental income | 6 | 11 |
| Insurance compensation | 2 | 2 |
| Other items | 45 | 22 |
| IS Total | 55 | 34 |
| EUR million | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|
| Operation and maintenance costs | 125 | 94 |
| Property taxes | 115 | 145 |
| IT and telecommunication costs | 60 | 51 |
| Other items | 276 | 195 |
| IS Total | 576 | 485 |
The major components recorded in other expenses are the external operation and maintenance costs of power and heat plants. Property taxes include taxes relating to directly owned hydropower production EUR 81 million (2016: 118). Other items includes expenses relating to properties and other operative expenses.
1) Exchange gains and losses on loans, receivables and derivatives totalling EUR 2 million (2016: -1).
2) Including fair value gains and losses on financial instruments and exchange gains and losses on derivatives EUR -12 million (2016: -2). See also Note 11 Finance costs - net.
| EUR million | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|
| Audit fees | 1.4 | 1.3 |
| Audit related assignments | 0.2 | 0.2 |
| Tax assignments | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Other assignments | 1.0 | 0.0 |
| Total | 2.6 | 1.5 |
Deloitte Oy is the appointed auditor until the next Annual General Meeting, to be held in 2018. Audit fees include fees for the audit of the consolidated financial statements, review of the interim reports as well as the fees for the audit of Fortum Corporation and its subsidiaries. Audit related assignments include fees for assurance of sustainability reporting and other assurance and associated services related to the audit. Tax assignments include fees for tax advice services. Other assignments consist of advisory services.
| EUR million | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|
| Materials | 1,769 | 1,216 |
| Materials purchased from associated companies and joint ventures | 431 | 540 |
| Transmission costs | 39 | 38 |
| External services | 63 | 37 |
| IS Total | 2,301 | 1,830 |
Materials consists mainly of coal, gas and nuclear fuels used for producing power and heat.
Materials purchased from associated companies consist of nuclear and hydropower purchased at production cost (including interest costs and production taxes) and purchased steam.
Total materials and services include production taxes EUR 109 million (2016: 141), of which nuclear related capacity and property taxes EUR 48 million (2016: 81) and hydro power related property taxes EUR 14 million (2016: 15). Taxes related to nuclear and hydro production are included in taxes paid through purchases from associated companies.
See Note 18 Participations in associated companies and joint ventures.
| EUR million | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|
| Wages and salaries | 312 | 248 |
| Pensions | ||
| Defined contribution plans | 32 | 25 |
| Defined benefit plans | 8 | 4 |
| Social security costs | 44 | 38 |
| Share-based incentives | 4 | 2 |
| Other employee costs | 23 | 17 |
| IS Total | 423 | 334 |
The compensation package for Fortum employees consists of salaries, fringe benefits, short-term incentives, profit sharing paid to the Personnel Fund and share-based long-term incentives.
The remuneration policy is determined by the Board of Directors. The Nomination and Remuneration Committee of the Board of Directors discusses, assesses and makes recommendations and proposals to the Board of Directors on the remuneration policy, remuneration of the President and CEO and the Fortum Executive Management and company-wide incentive arrangements for senior management and key personnel as well as monitors these plans annually. Additionally, the Committee contributes to the Group,s nomination issues by proposing to the Board of Directors any nominations regarding the members of Fortum Executive Management.
For further information on pensions see Note 30 Pension obligations.
Fortum's STI programme is designed to support the achievement of the company's financial and other relevant targets on an annual basis. All employees are covered by the programme or alternatively by a business specific or a comparable local variable pay arrangement.
The Board of Directors determines the performance criteria and award levels for the Fortum Executive Management. The awards are based on the achievement of divisional targets, Group financial performance as well as individual targets. The target incentive opportunity is 20% and the maximum incentive opportunity is 40% of the annual base salary. The Board of Directors assesses the performance of the President and CEO and the members of the Fortum Executive Management on a regular basis.
Awards for other employees are based on a combination of Group, divisional, functional and personal targets. The targets are set in annual performance discussions held at the beginning of the year. Awards under the STI programme are paid solely in cash.
The purpose of Fortum's share-based long-term incentive programme is to support the delivery of sustainable, long-term performance, align the interests of management with those of shareholders and assist in committing and retaining key individuals.
Fortum's LTI programme provides participants with the opportunity to earn company shares. Under the LTI programme and subject to the decision of the Board of Directors, a new LTI plan commences annually. The Board of Directors approves participation of the Fortum Executive Management members in each annually commencing LTI plan. Subject to a decision by the Board of Directors the President and CEO is authorised to decide on individual participants and potential maximum awards for other participants than the Fortum Executive Management in accordance with the nomination guidelines approved by the Board of Directors. Participation in the LTI plan precludes the individual from being a member in the Fortum Personnel Fund.
Each LTI plan begins with a three-year earnings period, during which participants may earn share rights if the performance criteria set by the Board of Directors are fulfilled. If the minimum performance criteria are not exceeded, no shares will be awarded. If performance is exceptionally good and the targets approved by the Board of Directors are achieved, the combined gross value of all variable compensation cannot exceed 120% of the person's annual salary in any calendar year. After the earnings period has ended and the relevant taxes and other employment-related expenses have been deducted, participants are paid the net balance in the form of shares.
For LTI plans commencing in 2013 onwards, any shares awarded to Fortum Executive Management members are subject to a three-year lock-up period. Subject to a decision by the Board of Directors, the lock-up period can be reduced to one year for those Fortum Executive Management members whose aggregate ownership of Fortum shares is greater than or equal to their annual salary. For other participants the lock-up period is one year. For LTI plans commencing prior to 2013, the lock-up period is three years for all participants. If the value of the shares decreases or increases during the lock-up or retention period, the participant will carry the potential loss or gain. For LTI plans commencing in 2017 and beyond, the share awards will not be subject to a minimum lock-up period. However, Fortum Executive Management members whose aggregate ownership of Fortum shares does not yet fulfil the shareholding requirement are required to retain at least 50% of the shares received until the required level of shareholding is met.
The Board of Directors has the right to revise the targets set in the incentive plans or decide to deviate from the payment based on achievement of the set earnings criteria or to discontinue any ongoing incentive plan.
The share plans under the LTI arrangement are accounted for as partly cash- and partly equity-settled arrangements. The portion of the earned reward that the participants receive in shares is accounted for as an equity settled transaction, and the portion of the earned reward settled in cash covering the tax and other charges, is accounted for as cash settled transaction. For participants receiving cash only, the total arrangement is accounted for as cash-settled transaction. The reward is recognised as an expense during the earnings period with a corresponding increase in the liabilities and for the transactions settled in shares in the equity. The social charges related to the arrangement payable by the employer are accrued as a liability. The LTI liability including social charges at the end of the year 2017 was EUR 18 million (2016: 19), including EUR 4 million (2016: 5) recorded in equity.
At present, approximately 120 key employees are participants in at least one of the six on-going annual LTI plans (plans 2012–2017, 2013–2018, 2014–2019, 2015–2020, 2016–2021 and 2017–2019).
| EUR million | Plan 2014–2019 |
Plan 2013–2018 |
Plan 2012–2017 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Grant date | 13 Feb 2017 12 Feb 2016 13 Feb 2015 | ||
| Grant price, EUR | 14.28 | 12.18 | 19.96 |
| Number of shares granted | 92,321 | 152,200 | 126,515 |
| Number of shares subsequently forfeited or | |||
| released from lock-up and other changes | -13,464 | -140,916 | -52,217 |
| Number of shares under lock-up at the end of the year 2017 | 78,857 | 11,284 | 74,298 |
In addition to the shares granted above, share rights have been granted to participants that will receive cash payments instead of shares after the lock-up period. The gross amount of share rights outstanding at the end of the year 2017 for plan 2014–2019 was 76,922, for plan 2013–2018 was 32,066 and for plan 2012–2017 89,111 share rights.
The Fortum Personnel Fund (for employees in Finland only) has been in operation since year 2000. The Board of Directors determines the criteria for the fund,s annual profit-sharing bonus. Persons included in Fortum,s long-term incentive schemes are not eligible to be members of this fund. Members of the personnel fund are the permanent and fixed-term employees of the Group. The membership of employees joining the company starts at the beginning of the next month after the employment relationship has been ongoing for five months. An employee is entitled to make withdrawals right from the beginning of the membership. The membership in the fund terminates when the member has received his/her share of the fund in full.
The profit-sharing received by the fund is distributed equally between the members. Each employee,s share is divided into a tied amount and an amount available for withdrawal. It is possible to transfer a maximum of 15% of capital from the tied amount to the amount available for withdrawal each year.
The amount available for withdrawal (maximum 15% of the tied amount) is decided each year by the council of the fund and it is paid to members who want to exercise their withdrawal rights.
The fund,s latest financial year ended at 30 April 2017 and the fund then had a total of 2,320 members (2016: 2,112). At the end of April 2017 Fortum contributed EUR 2.8 million (2016: 0.6) to the personnel fund as an annual profit-sharing bonus based on the financial results of 2016. The combined amount of members, shares in the fund was EUR 21 million (2016: 20).
The contribution to the personnel fund is expensed as it is earned.
10.4 The President and CEO and the Fortum Executive Management remuneration The Fortum Executive Management (FEM) consists of ten members, including the President and CEO. The following table presents the total remuneration of the President and CEO and the FEM and takes into account the changes in FEM during the year. The expenses are shown on accrual basis.
| 2017 | 2016 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EUR thousand | Pekka Lundmark, President and CEO |
Other FEM members |
Pekka Lundmark, President and CEO |
Other FEM members |
| Salaries and fringe benefits | 998 | 3,387 | 982 | 3,581 |
| Performance bonuses 1) | 187 | 589 | 248 | 925 |
| Share-based incentives 1) | 334 | 1,030 | 433 | 886 |
| Pensions (statutory) | 231 | 665 | 209 | 683 |
| Pensions (voluntary) | 229 | 712 | 356 | 769 |
| Social security expenses | 41 | 257 | 73 | 331 |
| Total | 2,019 | 6,640 | 2,299 | 7,174 |
1) Based on estimated amounts.
The annual contribution for the President and CEO Pekka Lundmark,s pension arrangement is 25% of the annual salary. The annual salary consists of base salary and fringe benefits. The President and CEO,s retirement age is 63. In case his assignment is terminated before the retirement age, the President and CEO is entitled to retain the benefits accrued in the arrangement.
For the other members of the FEM the retirement age varies between 60 and 65. According to group policy all new supplementary pension arrangements are defined contribution plans. For the members of the FEM that have defined contribution arrangements, the maximum pension premium percentage can be 25% of the annual salary. Members, who have joined Fortum prior 1 January 2009, are participating in defined benefit pension arrangements, where the benefit is 60–66% of the final pensionable salary with the pension provided by an insurance company or Fortum,s Pension Fund.
A pension liability of EUR 693 thousand (2016: 2,070) related to the defined benefit plans for FEM members has been recognised in the balance sheet. The additional pension arrangement for the President and CEO is a defined contribution pension plan and thus no liability has been recognised in the balance sheet.
In the event that Fortum decides to give notice of termination to the President and CEO, he is entitled to the salary for the notice period (6 months) and a severance pay equal to 12 months' salary. Other FEM members' termination compensation is equal to 6 to 12 months' salary.
The table below shows the number of shares delivered during 2017 and 2016 to the President and CEO and other FEM members under the LTI arrangements. Shares delivered under the plans are subject to a lock-up period under which they cannot be sold or transferred to a third party.
| 2017 3) | 2016 4) | |
|---|---|---|
| FEM members at 31 December 2017 | ||
| Pekka Lundmark, CEO | 4,463 | - |
| Alexander Chuvaev 1) | 15,480 | 27,897 |
| Kari Kautinen | 2,274 | 4,014 |
| Per Langer | 2,358 | 4,677 |
| Risto Penttinen (member of FEM from 1 April 2016) 2) | 1,793 | - |
| Markus Rauramo | 4,185 | 7,383 |
| Arto Räty (member of FEM from 1 April 2016) | - | - |
| Mikael Rönnblad (member of FEM from 15 May 2017) | - | N/A |
| Sirpa-Helena Sormunen | 1,777 | - |
| Tiina Tuomela | 2,563 | 3,902 |
| Former FEM members | ||
| Helena Aatinen (member of FEM until 31 March 2016) | N/A | 3,188 |
| Mikael Frisk (member of the FEM until 31 March 2016) | N/A | 5,028 |
| Esa Hyvärinen (member of FEM until 31 March 2016) | N/A | 3,053 |
| Timo Karttinen (member of FEM until 28 February 2017) | 3,626 | 6,399 |
| Matti Ruotsala (member of FEM until 31 October 2017) | 4,176 | 7,443 |
| Total | 42,695 | 72,984 |
1) Due to local legislation, share rights will be paid in cash instead of shares after the three-year lock-up period.
2) Shares delivered before the term in the Fortum Executive Management are not disclosed.
3) Share delivery based on share plan 2014–2019.
4) Share delivery based on share plan 2013–2018.
On 31 December 2017, the members of the Board of Directors owned a total of 9,200 shares (2016: 208,940), which corresponds to 0.00% (2016: 0.02%) of the company's shares and voting rights.
| 2017 | 2016 | |
|---|---|---|
| Board members at 31 December 2017 | ||
| Sari Baldauf, Chairman | 2,300 | 2,300 |
| Matti Lievonen, Deputy Chairman | 1,500 | N/A |
| Heinz-Werner Binzel | - | - |
| Eva Hamilton | - | 40 |
| Kim Ignatius | 2,400 | 2,400 |
| Anja McAlister | - | N/A |
| Veli-Matti Reinikkala | 3,000 | 3,000 |
| Former Board members | ||
| Tapio Kuula | N/A | 201,200 |
| Total | 9,200 | 208,940 |
The President and CEO and other members of the FEM owned a total of 200,667 shares (2016: 315,653) which corresponds to approximately 0.02% (2016: 0.04%) of the company,s shares and voting rights.
| Operating and financial review |
Consolidated | financial statements | Notes | Key figures 2008–2017 |
Parent company financial statements |
Proposal for the use of the profit shown on the balance sheet |
Auditor's report |
Operational key figures Quarterly financial information |
Investor information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Basis of preparation | Risks | Income statement | Balance sheet | Off balance sheet items Group structure and related parties |
| 2017 | 2016 | |
|---|---|---|
| FEM members at 31 December 2017 | ||
| Pekka Lundmark | 60,713 | 56,250 |
| Alexander Chuvaev | 14,713 | 14,713 |
| Kari Kautinen | 30,720 | 29,246 |
| Per Langer | 31,570 | 29,212 |
| Risto Penttinen | 10,588 | 8,795 |
| Markus Rauramo | 32,032 | 27,847 |
| Arto Räty | - | - |
| Mikael Rönnblad | - | N/A |
| Sirpa-Helena Sormunen | 4,777 | 3,000 |
| Tiina Tuomela | 15,554 | 12,991 |
| Former FEM member | ||
| Timo Karttinen | N/A | 87,090 |
| Matti Ruotsala | N/A | 46,509 |
| Total | 200,667 | 315,653 |
The Board of Directors comprises five to eight members who are elected at the Annual General Meeting for a one-year term of office, which expires at the end of the first Annual General Meeting following the election. At the end of 2017 the Board of Directors consists of seven members.
The Annual General meeting confirms the yearly compensation for the Board of Directors. Board members are not offered any long-term incentive benefits or participation in other incentive schemes. There are no pension arrangements for the Board members. Social security costs EUR 14 thousand (2016: 25) have been recorded for the fees in accordance with local legislation in respective countries.
| EUR thousand | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|
| Chairman | 75 | 75 |
| Deputy Chairman | 57 | 57 |
| Chairman of the Audit and Risk Committee 1) | 57 | 57 |
| Members | 40 | 40 |
1) If not Chairman or Deputy Chairman simultaneously.
Every member of the Board of Directors receives a fixed yearly fee and additional fees for each meeting attended. A meeting fee of EUR 600 is paid for board and committee meetings. For board members living outside Finland in Europe, the meeting fee is EUR 1,200; for board members living outside Europe, the meeting fee is EUR 1,800. For board and committee meetings held as a telephone conference, the meeting fee is paid as EUR 600 to all members. No fee is paid for decisions made without a separate meeting.
Board members are entitled to travel expense compensation in accordance with the company's travel policy.
| EUR thousand | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|
| Board members at 31 December 2017 | ||
| Sari Baldauf, Chairman | 84 | 87 |
| Matti Lievonen, Deputy Chairman from 4 April 2017 | 49 | N/A |
| Heinz-Werner Binzel | 57 | 61 |
| Eva Hamilton | 54 | 56 |
| Kim Ignatius, Chairman of the Audit and Risk Committee | 67 | 70 |
| Anja McAlister (member of the board from 4 April 2017) | 47 | N/A |
| Veli-Matti Reinikkala (member of the board from 5 April 2016) | 58 | 44 |
| Former Board members | ||
| Minoo Akhtarzand (member of the board until 4 April 2017) | 16 | 61 |
| Tapio Kuula (member of the board until 7 November 2017) | 43 | 52 |
| Petteri Taalas (member of board until 5 April 2016) | N/A | 17 |
| Jyrki Talvitie (member of the board until 4 April 2017) | 17 | 70 |
| Total | 492 | 518 |
| EUR million | Note | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Interest expense | |||
| Borrowings | -170 | -181 | |
| Other interest expense | -10 | -4 | |
| Capitalised borrowing costs | 17 | 16 | 16 |
| Total | -164 | -169 | |
| Interest income | |||
| Loan receivables and deposits | 28 | 29 | |
| Other interest income | 3 | 1 | |
| Total | 32 | 30 | |
| Fair value gains and losses on financial instruments | 7 | ||
| Fair value change of interest rate derivatives not getting hedge | |||
| accounting status | -7 | -9 | |
| Fair value change of hedging derivatives in fair value hedge | |||
| relationship | -31 | 11 | |
| Fair value change of hedged items in fair value hedge relationship | 31 | -11 | |
| Rate difference on forward contracts | -4 | 7 | |
| Total | -12 | -2 | |
| Exchange gains and losses | |||
| Loans and receivables | 7 | -51 | 143 |
| Cross currency interest rate derivatives | 7 | 6 | 12 |
| Foreign currency derivatives | 7 | 47 | -156 |
| Interest income on share of State Nuclear Waste Management Fund | 28 | 6 | 8 |
| Unwinding of discount on nuclear provisions | 28 | -45 | -40 |
| Unwinding of discount on other provisions | 29, 30 | -3 | -2 |
| Other financial income | 14 | 12 | |
| Other financial expenses | -25 | -6 | |
| Total | -50 | -29 | |
| IS Finance costs - net | -195 | -169 |
Interest expenses include interest expenses on interest-bearing loans, interest on interest rate and currency swaps and forward points on forward foreign exchange contracts hedging loans and receivables. Other interest expenses for 2017 include the interest expense of SEK 69 million (EUR 7 million) relating to the Swedish income tax assessment for 2009–2012. See Note 36 Legal actions and official proceedings.
Interest income includes EUR 12 million (2016: 15) from shareholders, loans in Finnish and Swedish nuclear companies, and EUR 10 million (2016: 12) from deposits and commercial papers.
Fair value gains and losses on financial instruments include change in clean price of interest rate and cross currency swaps not getting hedge accounting and fair value changes of interest rate derivatives in hedge relationship and hedged items. Accrued interest on these derivatives is entered in interest expenses of borrowings. Fair value gains and losses include also rate difference from forward contracts hedging loans and receivables without hedge accounting.
Exchange gains and losses includes exchange rate differences arising from valuation of foreign currency loans and receivables and exchange rate differences from forward foreign exchange contracts and interest rate and currency swaps.
Other financial income includes EUR 14 million from SIBUR receivable (2016:12). Other financial expenses includes EUR 16 million financial cost related to financing commitment for Uniper acquisition.
| EUR million | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|
| Interest rate and cross currency swaps | ||
| Interest expenses on borrowings | 21 | 16 |
| Exchange rate difference from derivatives | 6 | 12 |
| Rate difference in fair value gains and losses on financial instruments 1) | -38 | 2 |
| Total fair value change of interest rate derivatives in finance costs - net | -11 | 30 |
| Forward foreign exchange contracts | ||
| Interest expenses on borrowings | -68 | -62 |
| Exchange rate difference from derivatives | 47 | -156 |
| Rate difference in fair value gains and losses on financial instruments | -4 | 7 |
| Total fair value change of currency derivatives in finance costs - net | -25 | -211 |
| Total fair value change of interest and currency derivatives in finance costs - net | -36 | -181 |
1) Fair value gains and losses on financial instruments include fair value changes from interest rate swaps not getting hedge accounting amounting to EUR -7 million (2016: -9) and fair value change of hedging derivatives in fair value hedge relationship EUR -31 million (2016: 11), totalling EUR -38 million (2016: 2).
| EUR million | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|
| Finnish companies | 76 | 59 |
| Swedish companies | 240 | 46 |
| Russian companies | 269 | 202 |
| Other companies | 526 | 289 |
| IS Total | 1,111 | 595 |
Profit before tax split by country represents the respective countries' part of the profit before tax for Fortum Group according to International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS), i.e. based on the same accounting principles as for the Consolidated Financial Statements. This means that the respective country profits include such items as for example share of profits from associates and effects of accounting for nuclear provisions, which are not included in taxable profits in the local subsidiaries.
| EUR million | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|
| Current taxes | ||
| Finnish companies | -15 | -14 |
| Swedish companies | 2 | -1 |
| Russian companies | -11 | -2 |
| Other companies | -34 | -24 |
| Total | -58 | -42 |
| Deferred taxes | ||
| Finnish companies | 11 | 0 |
| Swedish companies | -34 | 10 |
| Russian companies | -43 | -36 |
| Other companies | 24 | -17 |
| Total | -42 | -42 |
| Adjustments recognised for current tax of prior periods | ||
| Finnish companies | -13 | -6 |
| Swedish companies 1) | -115 | 0 |
| Russian companies | 0 | 0 |
| Other companies | -1 | 0 |
| Total | -129 | -6 |
| IS Income tax expense | -229 | -90 |
1) Income tax expense 2017 from the unfavourable decisions in the Administrative
Court of Appeal in Sweden relating to the income tax assessments for 2009–2012.
The table below explains the difference between the theoretical enacted tax rate in Finland compared to the tax rate in the consolidated income statement.
| EUR million | 2017 | % | 2016 | % |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Profit before tax | 1,111 | 595 | ||
| Tax calculated at nominal Finnish tax rate | -222 | 20.0 | -119 | 20.0 |
| Tax rate changes | 6 | -0.6 | 0 | 0.0 |
| Differences in tax rates and regulations | 5 | -0.4 | 16 | -2.7 |
| Income not subject to tax | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| Tax exempt capital gains | 77 | -6.9 | 4 | -0.7 |
| Expenses not deductible for tax purposes | -3 | 0.3 | -5 | 0.8 |
| Share of profit of associated companies and joint ventures | 33 | -2.9 | 30 | -5.0 |
| Taxes related to dividend distributions | -10 | 0.9 | -8 | 1.4 |
| Changes in tax valuation allowance related to not | ||||
| recognised tax losses | -2 | 0.2 | -6 | 1.0 |
| Other items | 3 | -0.3 | 0 | 0.0 |
| Adjustments recognised for taxes of prior periods | -117 | 10.5 | -2 | 0.3 |
| IS Income tax expense | -229 | 20.6 | -90 | 15.2 |
The major items affecting the effective income tax rate are as follows:
The one-time tax-free capital gain (EUR 324 million) in Norway 2017 from the restructuring of the ownership in Hafslund reduced the effective income tax rate with 6.9%. Share of profit of associated companies and joint ventures during 2017 reduced the effective income tax rate with 2.9%. Fortum has booked a tax cost of EUR 115 million because of the unfavourable decisions from the Administrative Court of Appeal in Sweden relating to the income tax assessments for 2009–2012. This increased the effective income tax rate with 10.4%.
Effective income tax rate and total tax rate are impacted by gains or losses on sale of shares. In many countries like in Finland, Sweden, Netherlands and Norway income on capital gains and losses is treated as tax exempt. The purpose of this is to tax the operative income of the company and avoid taxing the
same income twice in case of the sale of the shares. Taxation of capital gains or losses is in line with the taxation of dividend income.
Fortum has had several tax audits ongoing during 2017. Based on these and earlier audits Fortum has received income tax assessments in Sweden for the years 2013–2015 and Belgium for the years 2008–2012. Fortum has appealed all assessments received. Based on legal analysis, no provision has been accounted for in the financial statements related to Sweden 2013–2015 and Belgium 2008–2012 tax audits.
For further information regarding the ongoing tax appeals see Note 36 Legal actions and official proceedings.
During 2017 entities primarily in Russia and Sweden used a portion of the deferred tax asset relating to tax loss carry forwards.
Fortum has a material deferred tax liability owing to its investments in non-current assets. These assets are depreciated more rapidly for tax than for accounting purposes resulting in lower current tax payments at the start of an asset,s lifetime and higher tax payments at the end of its lifetime. This difference results in a deferred tax liability.
Taxes borne indicate different taxes that Fortum pays for the period. In 2017 Fortum's taxes borne were EUR 445 million (2016: 365). Taxes borne include corporate income taxes (excluding deferred taxes), production taxes, employment taxes, taxes on property and cost of indirect taxes. Production taxes include also taxes, on production and on property, paid through purchased electricity from associated companies.
The total tax rate indicates the burden on taxes borne by Fortum from its profit before these taxes. The total tax rate and total comparable tax rate (excluding the share of profits from associates and joint ventures and tax exempt capital gains) for 2017 is 32.5% and 48.1% (2016: 40.0% and 47.5%). In addition, Fortum administers and collects different taxes on behalf of governments and authorities. Such taxes include VAT, and excise taxes on power consumed by customers, payroll taxes and withholding taxes. The amount of taxes collected by Fortum was EUR 521 million (2016: 376).
See also Note 27 Income taxes in the balance sheet and Note 9 Materials and services.
Basic earnings per share is calculated by dividing the net profit attributable to the owners of the parent company by the weighted average number of ordinary shares in issue during the year, excluding ordinary shares purchased by the Group and held as treasury shares.
Diluted earnings per share is calculated adjusting the weighted average number of ordinary shares outstanding to assume conversion of all dilutive potential ordinary shares. For the warrants and stock options a calculation is done to determine the number of shares that could have been acquired at fair value (determined as the average annual market share price of the Fortum share) based on the monetary value of the subscription rights attached to outstanding stock options.
The number of shares calculated as above is deducted from the number of shares that would have been issued assuming the exercise of the stock options. The incremental shares obtained through the assumed exercise of the options and warrants are added to the weighted average number of shares outstanding.
Options and warrants have a dilutive effect only when the average market price of ordinary shares during the period exceeds the exercise price of the options or warrants. Previously reported earnings per share are not retroactively adjusted to reflect changes in price of ordinary shares.
Dividends proposed by the Board of Directors are not recognised in the financial statements until they have been approved by the Company's shareholders at the Annual General Meeting.
| 2017 | 2016 | |
|---|---|---|
| IS Profit attributable to owners of the parent (EUR million) | 866 | 496 |
| Weighted average number of shares (thousand) | 888,367 | 888,367 |
| Basic earnings per share (EUR) | 0.98 | 0.56 |
As Fortum currently has no dilutive instruments outstanding, diluted earnings per share is the same as basic earnings per share.
Basis of preparation Risks Income statement Balance sheet Off balance sheet items Group structure and related parties
Dividends proposed by the Board of Directors are not recognised in the financial statements until they have been approved by the Company's shareholders at the Annual General Meeting.
A dividend in respect of 2017 of EUR 1.10 per share, amounting to a total dividend of EUR 977 million based on the amount of shares registered as at 1 February 2018, is to be proposed at the Annual General Meeting on 28 March 2018. These Financial statements do not reflect this dividend.
A dividend for 2016 of EUR 1.10 per share, amounting to a total of EUR 977 million, was decided in the Annual General Meeting on 4 April 2017. The dividend was paid on 13 April 2017.
A dividend for 2015 of EUR 1.10 per share, amounting to a total of EUR 977 million, was decided in the Annual General Meeting on 5 April 2016. The dividend was paid on 14 April 2016.
The Group classifies its investments in the following categories: financial assets at fair value through profit or loss, loans and receivables and available-for-sale financial assets. The classification depends on the purpose for which the investments were acquired. Management determines the classification of its financial assets at initial recognition and re-evaluates this designation at every reporting date.
A financial asset is classified in this category if acquired principally for the purpose of selling in the short term. Derivatives are also categorised as held for trading unless they are designated as hedges. Assets in this category are classified as current assets if they are either held for trading or are expected to be realised within 12 months of the closing date.
Loans and receivables are non-derivative financial assets with fixed or determinable payments that are not quoted in an active market. They arise when the Group provides money, goods or services directly to a debtor. They are included in non-current assets, except for maturities under 12 months after the closing date. These are classified as current assets.
Available-for-sale financial assets are non-derivatives that are either designated in this category or not classified in any of the other categories. They are included in non-current assets unless there is an intention to dispose of the investment within 12 months of the closing date.
Purchases and sales of investments are recognised on the trade-date – the date on which the Group commits to purchase or sell the asset. Investments are initially recognised at fair value plus transaction costs for all financial assets not carried at fair value through profit or loss. Investments are derecognised when the rights to receive cash flows from the investments have expired or have been transferred and the Group has transferred substantially all risks and rewards of ownership.
Available-for-sale financial assets and financial assets at fair value through profit or loss are subsequently carried at fair value. Loans are carried at amortised cost using the effective interest method. Gains and losses arising from changes in the fair value of the 'financial assets at fair value through profit or loss' category are included in the income statement in the period in which they arise. Gains and
Proposal for the use of the profit shown on the balance sheet
Auditor's report
Operational key figures Quarterly financial information Investor information
Basis of preparation Risks Income statement Balance sheet Off balance sheet items Group structure and related parties
losses arising from changes in the fair value of securities classified as available-for-sale are recognised in equity. When securities classified as available-for-sale are sold or impaired, the accumulated fair value adjustments are included in the income statement.
The fair values of quoted investments are based on current bid prices. If the market for a financial asset is not active (and for unlisted securities), the Group establishes fair value by using valuation techniques. These include the use of recent arm's length transactions, reference to other instruments that are substantially the same, discounted cash flow analysis, and option pricing models refined to reflect the issuer's specific circumstances.
The Group assesses at each closing date whether there is objective evidence that a financial asset or a group of financial assets is impaired. If any such evidence exists for available-for-sale financial assets, the cumulative loss – measured as the difference between the acquisition cost and the current fair value, less any impairment loss on that financial asset previously recognised in profit or loss – is removed from equity and recognised in the income statement.
Within the ordinary course of business the Group routinely enters into sale and purchase transactions for commodities. The majority of these transactions take the form of contracts that were entered into and continue to be held for the purpose of receipt or delivery of the commodity in accordance with the Group's expected sale, purchase or usage requirements. Such contracts are not within the scope of IAS 39. All other net-settled commodity contracts are measured at fair value with gains and losses taken to the income statement.
Derivatives are initially recognised at fair value on the date a derivative contract is entered into and are subsequently re-measured at their fair value. The method of recognising the resulting gain or loss depends on whether the derivative is designated as a hedging instrument, and if so, the nature of the item being hedged. The Group designates certain derivatives as either: 1) hedges of highly probable forecast transactions (cash flow hedges); 2) hedges of the fair value of recognised assets or liabilities or a firm commitment (fair value hedge); or 3) hedges of net investments in foreign operations. The Group documents at the inception of the transaction the relationship between hedging instruments and hedged items, as well as its risk management objective and strategy for undertaking various hedge transactions. The Group also documents its assessment, both at hedge inception and on an ongoing basis, of whether the derivatives that are used in hedging transactions are highly effective in offsetting changes in fair values or cash flows of hedged items. Derivatives are divided into non-current and current based on maturity. Only for those electricity derivatives, which have cash flows in different years, the fair values are split between non-current and current assets or liabilities.
The effective portion of changes in the fair value of derivatives that are designated and qualify as cash flow hedges are recognised in equity. The gain or loss relating to the ineffective portion is recognised immediately in the income statement. Amounts accumulated in equity are recycled in the income statement in the periods when the hedged item will affect profit or loss (for instance when the forecast sale that is hedged takes place). However, when the forecast transaction that is hedged results in the recognition of a non-financial asset (for example, inventory) or a liability, the gains and losses previously deferred in equity are transferred from equity and included in the initial measurement of the cost of the asset or liability. When a hedge no longer meets the criteria for hedge accounting, any cumulative gain or loss existing in equity is recognised in the income statement when the forecast transaction is ultimately also recognised in the income statement. When a forecast transaction is no longer expected to occur, the cumulative gain or loss that was reported in equity is immediately recognised in the income statement.
Changes in the fair value of derivatives that are designated and qualify as fair value hedges are recorded in the income statement, together with any changes in the fair value of the hedged asset or liability that are attributable to the hedged risk.
If the hedge no longer meets the criteria for hedge accounting, the adjustment to the carrying amount of a hedged item for which the effective interest method is used is amortised to profit or loss for the period to maturity.
Hedges of net investments in foreign operations are accounted for similarly to cash flow hedges. Any gain or loss on the hedging instrument relating to the effective portion of the hedge is recognised in equity; the gain or loss relating to the ineffective portion is recognised immediately in the income statement. Gains and losses accumulated in equity are included in the income statement when the foreign operation is disposed of.
Certain derivative instruments hedging future cash flows do not qualify for hedge accounting. Fair value changes of these financial derivative instruments are recognised in items affecting comparability in the income statement.
Financial assets and liabilities in the tables below are split into categories in accordance with IAS 39. The categories are further split into classes which are the basis for valuing a respective asset or liability. Further information can be found in the Notes mentioned in the table.
| Operating and | Consolidated | Notes | Key figures | Parent company | Proposal for the use of the profit | Auditor's | Operational key figures | Investor |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| financial review | financial statements | 2008–2017 | financial statements | shown on the balance sheet | report | Quarterly financial information | information | |
| Basis of preparation Risks Income statement Balance sheet Off balance sheet items Group structure and related parties |
| Loans and receivables Financial assets at fair value through profit and loss | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EUR million | Note | Amortised cost | Hedge accounting, fair value hedges |
Non-hedge accounting | Fair value recognised in equity, cash flow hedges |
Available-for-sale financial assets |
Finance lease | Total financial assets |
| Financial instruments in non-current assets | ||||||||
| Other non-current assets | 19 | 74 | 65 | 140 | ||||
| Derivative financial instruments | 3 | |||||||
| Electricity derivatives | 35 | 0 | 35 | |||||
| Interest rate and currency derivatives | 140 | 85 | 13 | 238 | ||||
| Other commodity future and forward contracts |
7 | 7 | ||||||
| Long-term interest-bearing receivables | 20 | 969 | 41 | 1,010 | ||||
| Financial instruments in current assets | ||||||||
| Derivative financial instruments | 3 | |||||||
| Electricity derivatives | 69 | 21 | 90 | |||||
| Interest rate and currency derivatives | 29 | 85 | 114 | |||||
| Other commodity future and forward | 36 | 0 | 36 | |||||
| contracts | ||||||||
| Trade receivables | 22 | 638 | 638 | |||||
| Other short-term interest-bearing receivables | 20 | 395 | 395 | |||||
| Liquid funds | 23 | 1,928 | 1,968 | 3,897 | ||||
| Total | 4,004 | 140 | 261 | 119 | 2,033 | 41 | 6,600 |
| Loans and receivables Financial assets at fair value through profit and loss | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hedge accounting, fair | Fair value recognised in | Available-for-sale | Total financial | |||||
| EUR million | Note | Amortised cost | value hedges | Non-hedge accounting | equity, cash flow hedges | financial assets | Finance lease | assets |
| Financial instruments in non-current assets | ||||||||
| Other non-current assets | 19 | 55 | 58 | 113 | ||||
| Derivative financial instruments | 3 | |||||||
| Electricity derivatives | 67 | 1 | 68 | |||||
| Interest rate and currency derivatives | 179 | 103 | 61 | 343 | ||||
| Other commodity future and forward | 5 | 5 | ||||||
| contracts | ||||||||
| Long-term interest-bearing receivables | 20 | 985 | 985 | |||||
| Financial instruments in current assets | ||||||||
| Derivative financial instruments | 3 | |||||||
| Electricity derivatives | 88 | 0 | 88 | |||||
| Interest rate and currency derivatives | 7 | 16 | 23 | |||||
| Other commodity future and forward | 18 | 0 | 18 | |||||
| contracts | ||||||||
| Trade receivables | 22 | 562 | 562 | |||||
| Other short-term interest-bearing receivables | 20 | 395 | 395 | |||||
| Liquid funds | 23 | 1,444 | 3,711 | 5,155 | ||||
| Total | 3,441 | 179 | 288 | 78 | 3,769 | 0 | 7,755 |
| Operating and | Consolidated | Notes | Key figures | Parent company | Proposal for the use of the profit | Auditor's | Operational key figures | Investor |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| financial review | financial statements | 2008–2017 | financial statements | shown on the balance sheet | report | Quarterly financial information | information | |
| Basis of preparation Risks Income statement Balance sheet Off balance sheet items Group structure and related parties |
| Financial liabilities at fair value through profit and loss | Other financial liabilities | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EUR million | Note | Hedge accounting, fair value hedges |
Non-hedge accounting | Fair value recognised in equity, cash flow hedges |
Amortised costs | Fair value | Total financial liabilities |
| Financial instruments in non-current liabilities | |||||||
| Interest-bearing liabilities | 26 | 3,082 | 1,037 1) | 4,119 | |||
| Derivative financial instruments | 3 | ||||||
| Electricity derivatives | 100 | 23 | 123 | ||||
| Interest rate and currency derivatives | 26 | 43 | 19 | 88 | |||
| Other commodity future and forward contracts | 3 | 3 | |||||
| Financial instruments in current liabilities | |||||||
| Interest-bearing liabilities | 26 | 766 | 766 | ||||
| Derivative financial instruments | 3 | ||||||
| Electricity derivatives | 131 | 31 | 162 | ||||
| Interest rate and currency derivatives | 12 | 12 | 24 | ||||
| Other commodity future and forward contracts | 13 | 0 | 13 | ||||
| Trade payables | 32 | 318 | 318 | ||||
| Other liabilities | 32 | 208 | 208 | ||||
| Total | 26 | 302 | 85 | 4,374 | 1,037 | 5,824 |
| Financial liabilities at fair value through profit and loss | Other financial liabilities | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EUR million | Note | Hedge accounting, fair value hedges |
Non-hedge accounting | Fair value recognised in equity, cash flow hedges |
Amortised costs | Fair value | Total financial liabilities |
| Financial instruments in non-current liabilities | |||||||
| Interest-bearing liabilities | 26 | 3,188 | 1,280 1) | 4,468 | |||
| Derivative financial instruments | 3 | ||||||
| Electricity derivatives | 90 | 48 | 138 | ||||
| Interest rate and currency derivatives | 32 | 51 | 38 | 121 | |||
| Other commodity future and forward contracts | 3 | 3 | |||||
| Financial instruments in current liabilities | |||||||
| Interest-bearing liabilities | 26 | 639 | 639 | ||||
| Derivative financial instruments | 3 | ||||||
| Electricity derivatives | 155 | 83 | 238 | ||||
| Interest rate and currency derivatives | 130 | 10 | 140 | ||||
| Other commodity future and forward contracts | 18 | 0 | 18 | ||||
| Trade payables | 32 | 323 | 323 | ||||
| Other liabilities | 32 | 86 | 86 | ||||
| Total | 32 | 447 | 179 | 4,236 | 1,280 | 6,174 |
1) Fair valued part of bond in fair value hedge relationship.
1
Key figures 2008–2017 Notes
Parent company financial statements Proposal for the use of the profit shown on the balance sheet
Auditor's report
Operational key figures Quarterly financial information Investor information
Basis of preparation Risks Income statement Balance sheet Off balance sheet items Group structure and related parties
Fair value measurements are classified using a fair value hierarchy i.e. Level 1, Level 2 and Level 3 that reflects the significance of the inputs used in making the measurements.
The fair value of some commodity derivatives traded in active markets (such as publicly traded electricity options, coal, gas and oil futures) are market quotes at the closing date.
The fair value of financial instruments including electricity derivatives traded in active markets (such as publicly traded derivatives, and trading and available-for-sale securities) is based on quoted market prices at the closing date. Known calculation techniques, such as estimated discounted cash flows, are used to determine fair value of interest rate and currency financial instruments. The fair value of interestrate swaps is calculated as the present value of the estimated future cash flows. The fair value of forward foreign exchange contracts is determined using forward exchange market rates at the closing date. Fair values of options are determined by using option valuation models. The fair value of financial liabilities is estimated by discounting the future contractual cash flows at the current market interest rate that is available to the Group for similar financial instruments. In fair valuation, credit spread has not been adjusted, as quoted market prices of the instruments used are believed to be consistent with the objective of a fair value measurement.
The Group bases the calculation on existing market conditions at each closing date. Financial instruments used in Fortum are standardised products that are either cleared via exchanges or widely traded in the market. Commodity derivatives are generally cleared through exchanges such as for example Nasdaq Commodities Europe and financial derivatives done with creditworthy financial institutions with investment grade ratings.
Investments in unlisted shares classified as Available-for-sale financial assets, for which the fair value cannot be reliably determined. These assets are measured at cost less any impairments.
The nominal value less estimated credit adjustments of trade receivables and payables are assumed to approximate their fair values.
| Operating and | Consolidated | Notes | Key figures | Parent company | Proposal for the use of the profit | Auditor's | Operational key figures | Investor |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| financial review | financial statements | 2008–2017 | financial statements | shown on the balance sheet | report | Quarterly financial information | information | |
| Basis of preparation Risks Income statement Balance sheet Off balance sheet items Group structure and related parties |
| Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Netting 2) | Total | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EUR million | Note | 2017 | 2016 | 2017 | 2016 | 2017 | 2016 | 2017 | 2016 | 2017 | 2016 |
| In non-current assets | |||||||||||
| Available-for-sale financial assets 1) | 19 | 0 | 0 | 65 | 58 | 65 | 58 | ||||
| Derivative financial instruments | 3 | ||||||||||
| Electricity derivatives | |||||||||||
| Hedge accounting | 5 | 4 | -5 | -3 | 0 | 1 | |||||
| Non-hedge accounting | 0 | 0 | 66 | 98 | -30 | -31 | 35 | 67 | |||
| Interest rate and currency derivatives | |||||||||||
| Hedge accounting | 153 | 240 | 153 | 240 | |||||||
| Non-hedge accounting | 85 | 103 | 85 | 103 | |||||||
| Other commodity future and forward contracts |
|||||||||||
| Non-hedge accounting | 8 | 7 | -1 | -2 | 7 | 5 | |||||
| In current assets | |||||||||||
| Derivative financial instruments | 3 | ||||||||||
| Electricity derivatives | |||||||||||
| Hedge accounting | 28 | 9 | -7 | -9 | 21 | 0 | |||||
| Non-hedge accounting | 8 | 0 | 253 | 381 | -192 | -293 | 69 | 88 | |||
| Interest rate and currency derivatives | |||||||||||
| Hedge accounting | 85 | 16 | 85 | 16 | |||||||
| Non-hedge accounting | 29 | 7 | 29 | 7 | |||||||
| Other commodity future and forward contracts |
|||||||||||
| Non-hedge accounting | 186 | 106 | 1 | 2 | -151 | -90 | 36 | 18 | |||
| Total | 202 | 113 | 705 | 860 | 65 | 58 | -386 | -428 | 586 | 603 |
1) Available-for-sale financial assets, i.e. shares which are not classified as associated companies or joint ventures, consists mainly of shares in unlisted companies of EUR 65 million (Dec 31 2016: 58), for which the fair value cannot be reliably determined. This includes EUR 25 million (Dec 31 2016: 18) from Fortum's shareholding in Fennovoima. These assets are measured at cost less any impairments.
Available-for-sale financial assets include listed shares at fair value of EUR 0 million (2016: 0). The cumulative fair value change booked in Fortum's equity was EUR -3 million (2016: -3).
2) Receivables and liabilities against electricity and other commodity exchanges arising from standard derivative contracts with same delivery period are netted.
| Operating and | Consolidated | Notes | Key figures | Parent company | Proposal for the use of the profit | Auditor's | Operational key figures | Investor |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| financial review | financial statements | 2008–2017 | financial statements | shown on the balance sheet | report | Quarterly financial information | information | |
| Basis of preparation Risks Income statement Balance sheet Off balance sheet items Group structure and related parties |
| Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Netting 2) | Total | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EUR million | Note | 2017 | 2016 | 2017 | 2016 | 2017 | 2016 | 2017 | 2016 | 2017 | 2016 |
| In non-current liabilities | |||||||||||
| Interest-bearing liabilities | 26 | 1,037 1) | 1,280 1) | 1,037 | 1,280 | ||||||
| Derivative financial instruments | 3 | ||||||||||
| Electricity derivatives | |||||||||||
| Hedge accounting | 28 | 51 | -5 | -3 | 23 | 48 | |||||
| Non-hedge accounting | 131 | 121 | -30 | -31 | 100 | 90 | |||||
| Interest rate and currency derivatives | |||||||||||
| Hedge accounting | 45 | 70 | 45 | 70 | |||||||
| Non-hedge accounting | 43 | 51 | 43 | 51 | |||||||
| Other commodity future and forward contracts |
|||||||||||
| Non-hedge accounting | 3 | 5 | 1 | -1 | -2 | 3 | 3 | ||||
| In current liabilities | |||||||||||
| Derivative financial instruments | 3 | ||||||||||
| Electricity derivatives | |||||||||||
| Hedge accounting | 39 | 92 | -7 | -9 | 31 | 83 | |||||
| Non-hedge accounting | 7 | 0 | 315 | 448 | -192 | -293 | 131 | 155 | |||
| Interest rate and currency derivatives | |||||||||||
| Hedge accounting | 12 | 10 | 12 | 10 | |||||||
| Non-hedge accounting | 12 | 130 | 12 | 130 | |||||||
| Other commodity future and forward contracts |
|||||||||||
| Non-hedge accounting | 160 | 106 | 4 | 2 | -151 | -90 | 13 | 18 | |||
| Total | 170 | 111 | 1,667 | 2,255 | 0 | 0 | -386 | -428 | 1,451 | 1,938 |
1) Fair valued part of bonds in fair value hedge relationship.
2) Receivables and liabilities against electricity and other commodity exchanges arising from standard derivative contracts with same delivery period are netted.
Net fair value amount of interest rate and currency derivatives is EUR 241 million, including assets EUR 353 million and liabilities EUR 112 million. Fortum has cash collaterals based on Credit Support Annex agreements with some counterparties. At the end of December 2017 Fortum had received EUR 113 million from Credit Support Annex agreements. The received cash has been booked as short-term liability.
40
Key figures 2008–2017 Notes
Parent company financial statements Proposal for the use of the profit shown on the balance sheet
Auditor's report
Operational key figures Quarterly financial information
Basis of preparation Risks Income statement Balance sheet Off balance sheet items Group structure and related parties
Intangible assets, except goodwill, are stated at the historical cost less accumulated amortisation and impairment losses. They are amortised on a straight-line method over their expected useful lives.
Acquired computer software licences are capitalised on the basis of the costs incurred when bringing the software into use. Costs associated with developing or maintaining computer software are recognised as an expense as incurred. Costs that are directly associated with the production of identifiable and unique software products controlled by the Group, and that will generate economic benefits exceeding costs beyond one year, are recognised as intangible assets. Direct costs include the software development employee costs and an appropriate portion of relevant overheads. Computer software costs recognised as assets are amortised over their estimated useful lives (three to five years).
Trademarks and licences are shown at historical cost less accumulated amortisation and impairment losses, as applicable. Amortisation is calculated using the straight-line method to allocate the cost of trademarks and licences over their estimated useful lives (15–20 years).
Contractual customer relationships acquired in a business combination are recognised at fair value on acquisition date. The contractual customer relations have a finite useful life and are carried at costs less accumulated amortisation. Amortisation is calculated using the straight-line method over the expected duration of the customer relationship.
Goodwill represents the excess of the cost of an acquisition over the fair value of the Group's share of net identifiable assets of the acquired subsidiary, associate or joint venture at the date of acquisition. Goodwill on acquisitions of subsidiaries is included in intangible assets and tested yearly for impairment. Goodwill on acquisition of associates and joint ventures is included in investments in associates and joint ventures and is tested for impairment as part of the overall balance. Goodwill is tested annually for impairment and carried at cost less accumulated impairment losses. Impairment losses on goodwill are not reversed. Gains and losses on disposal of an entity include the carrying amount of goodwill relating to the entity sold.
The Group accounts for emission allowances based on currently valid IFRS standards where purchased emission allowances are accounted for as intangible assets at cost, whereas emission allowances received free of charge are accounted for at nominal value. For CO2 emissions from power and heat production, a provision is recognized. CO2 emission costs is settled by returning emission allowances. To the extent that the Group already holds allowances to cover emission costs, the provision is measured at the carrying amount of those allowances. Any shortfall of allowances held over the obligation is valued at the current market value of allowances. The emission cost is recognised in the income statement within materials and services. The sales gains and losses of emission allowances not used for covering the obligation from CO2 emissions, are reported in other income.
The individual assets' carrying values are reviewed continuously to determine whether there is any indication of impairment. An asset's carrying amount is written down immediately to its recoverable amount if it is greater than the estimated recoverable amount.
In addition, impairment needs are assessed and documented once a year in connection with the long-term forecasting process. Indications for impairment are analysed separately by each division as they are different for each business and include risks such as changes in electricity and fuel prices, regulatory/political changes relating to energy taxes and price regulations etc. Impairment testing needs to be performed if any of the impairment indications exists. Assets that have an indefinite useful life and goodwill, are not subject to amortisation and are tested annually for impairment.
Value in use is determined by discounting the future cash flows expected to be derived from an asset. If it's not possible to estimate the cash flows generated by an individual asset, the impairment testing is performed on a cash-generating unit level. Fortum defines the cash-generating unit as the smallest business area where the tested assets generate cash flows that are independent of the cash flows generated by other assets in other business areas. Goodwill is allocated to the cash-generating unit or lowest level of groups of cash-generating units that benefit from the synergies of the acquired goodwill. Cash flow projections are based on the most recent long-term forecast that has been approved by management and the Board of Directors. Cash flows arising from future investments such as new plants are excluded unless projects have been started. The cash outflow needed to complete the started projects is included.
Non-financial assets other than goodwill that suffered an impairment charge are reviewed for possible reversal of the impairment at each reporting date.
In an acquisition acquired intangible and tangible assets are fair valued and their remaining useful lives are determined. Management believes that the assigned values and useful lives, as well as the underlying assumptions, are reasonable. Different assumptions and assigned lives could have a significant impact on the reported amounts.
The Group has significant carrying values in property, plant and equipment, intangible assets and participations in associated companies and joint ventures which are tested for impairment according to the accounting policy described above.
The Group has significant carrying values in property, plant and equipment, intangible assets and participations in associated companies and joint ventures which are tested for impairment according to the accounting policy described in the notes. The recoverable amounts of cash-generating units have been determined based on value in use calculations. These calculations are based on estimated future cash flows from most recent approved long-term forecast. Preparation of these estimates requires management to make assumptions relating to future expectations. Assumptions vary depending on the business the tested assets are in. For power and heat generation business the main assumptions relate to the estimated future operating cash flows and the discount rates that are used in calculating the present value.
Estimates are also made in an acquisition when determining the fair values and remaining useful lives of acquired intangible and tangible assets.
| Goodwill | Other intangible assets |
Total | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EUR million | 2017 | 2016 | 2017 | 2016 | 2017 | 2016 |
| Cost 1 January | 353 | 152 | 386 | 332 | 739 | 485 |
| Translation differences and other adjustments | -27 | 39 | -20 | -1 | -47 | 37 |
| Acquisition of subsidiary companies | 286 | 163 | 381 | 59 | 667 | 221 |
| Capital expenditure | 0 | 0 | 18 | 3 | 18 | 3 |
| Disposals | 0 | 0 | -14 | -11 | -14 | -11 |
| Sale of subsidiary companies | 0 | 0 | -2 | 0 | -2 | 0 |
| Reclassifications | 0 | 0 | 15 | 4 | 15 | 4 |
| Cost 31 December | 613 | 353 | 764 | 386 | 1,377 | 739 |
| Accumulated depreciation 1 January | 0 | 0 | 273 | 262 | 273 | 262 |
| Translation differences and other adjustments | 0 | 0 | -6 | -2 | -6 | -2 |
| Acquisition of subsidiary companies | 0 | 0 | 30 | 5 | 30 | 5 |
| Disposals | 0 | 0 | -14 | -11 | -14 | -11 |
| Sale of subsidiary companies | 0 | 0 | -1 | 0 | -1 | 0 |
| Reclassifications | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 |
| Depreciation for the period | 0 | 0 | 30 | 19 | 30 | 19 |
| Accumulated depreciation 31 December | 0 | 0 | 313 | 273 | 313 | 273 |
| BS Carrying amount 31 December | 613 | 353 | 451 | 113 | 1,064 | 467 |
Total goodwill in the balance sheet as of 31 December 2017 amounted to EUR 613 million (2016: 353).
Goodwill arising from acquisitions of Hafslund Markets Group and Fortum Oslo Varme Group increase the amount of goodwill by EUR 285 million. The acquisitions enable scale benefits and combination of competences that support Fortum's strategic growth and cash flow ambitions in the Nordic retail electricity and district heating markets and will also enhance the development of new and greener technologies and services. Hafslund Markets is integrated in Consumer Solutions segment and Fortum Oslo Varme in City Solutions segment. The purchase price allocation is still preliminary and also the allocation of goodwill to separate cash generating units is still on-going.
During 2017 Fortum finalised the purchase price allocation for the Waste Solutions Oy Group (formerly Ekokem Corporation) acquired in 2016. The acquisition supports Fortum's vision and strategy of creating solutions for sustainable cities in the whole City Solutions division and as a result, the goodwill from this acquisition is allocated to the City Solutions segment level.
See more information on the acquisitions in Note 38 Acquisitions and disposals.
| Operating and | Consolidated | Notes | Key figures | Parent company | Proposal for the use of the profit | Auditor's | Operational key figures | Investor |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| financial review | financial statements | 2008–2017 | financial statements | shown on the balance sheet | report | Quarterly financial information | information | |
| Basis of preparation | Risks | Income statement | Balance sheet | Off balance sheet items Group structure and related parties |
| Group of cash-generating units | Goodwill EUR million |
|---|---|
| Consumer Solutions | 228 |
| City Solutions | 208 |
| Russia | 177 |
| Total carrying amount 31 December 2017 | 613 |
The main items in other intangible assets are customer contracts, costs for software products and software licenses, bought emission rights and emission rights received free of charge, which are recognised to the lower of fair value and historical cost.
The impairment testing of the allocated goodwill in 2017 is described below.
Key assumptions used in impairment testing are presented below as well as the basis for determining the value of each assumption. Assumptions are based on internal and external data that are consistent with observable market information, when applicable. The assumptions are determined by management as part of the long-term forecasting process for the Fortum Group.
| Key assumptions | Basis for determining the value for key assumptions |
|---|---|
| Power market development, recycling and waste solutions market development |
Historical analysis and prospective forecasting |
| Regulation framework | Current market setup and prospective forecasting (e.g. CSA mechanism in Russia) |
| Utilisation of power plants and treatment facilities | Past experience, technical assessment and forecasted market development |
| Forecasted maintenance investments | Past experience, technical assessment and planned maintenance work |
| Discount rate | Mostly market based information |
The cash flows used in determining the value in use for each cash generating unit are based on the most recent long-term forecasts and are determined in local currency. The period covered by cash flows is related to the useful lives of the assets being reviewed for impairment. The growth rate used to extrapolate the cash flow projections until the end of assets, useful lives is in line with the assumed inflation. In Russia the generation capacity built after 2007 under the Russian Government,s Capacity Supply Agreements receives guaranteed capacity payments for a period of 10 years.
The discount rate takes into account the risk profile of the country in which the cash flows are generated. There have not been any major changes in the discount rate components or in the methods used to determine them. The long-term pre-tax discount rate used were: City Solutions 7.4%, Consumer Solutions 7.7% and Russia 11.1%.
The net operating assets of the CGUs and group of CGUs with allocated goodwill are tested yearly for possible impairment. The tested net operating assets include both the goodwill and fair value adjustments arising from the acquisitions. As of 31 December 2017, the recoverable values were greater than their carrying values and therefore no impairments were booked.
The Group has considered the sensitivity of key assumptions as part of the impairment testing. When doing this any consequential effect of the change on the other variables has also been considered. The calculations are most sensitive to changes in estimated future EBITDA levels and changes in discount rate.
Management estimates that a reasonably possible change in the discount rate used or in future earnings would not cause the carrying amount to exceed its recoverable amount in any of the tested units.
Based on the sensitivity analysis done, if the estimated future EBITDA were 10% lower than management,s estimates or pre-tax discount rate applied was 10% higher than the one used, the Group would not need to recognise impairment losses for tested items.
40
Parent company financial statements Proposal for the use of the profit shown on the balance sheet
Auditor's report
Operational key figures Quarterly financial information Investor information
Basis of preparation Risks Income statement Balance sheet Off balance sheet items Group structure and related parties
Property, plant and equipment comprise mainly power and heat producing buildings and machinery buildings, waterfall rights, district heating network and buildings and machinery as well as landfill sites and treatment areas used in waste treatment operations. Property, plant and equipment are stated at historical cost less accumulated depreciation and accumulated impairment losses as applicable in the consolidated balance sheet. Historical cost includes expenditure that is directly attributable to the acquisition of an item and capitalized borrowing costs. Cost may also include transfers from equity of any gains or losses on qualifying cash flow hedges of foreign currency purchases of property, plant and equipment. Acquired assets on the acquisition of a new subsidiary are stated at their fair values at the date of acquisition.
Subsequent costs are included in the asset's carrying amount or recognised as a separate asset, as appropriate, only when it is probable that future economic benefits associated with the item will flow to the Group and the cost of the item can be measured reliably. All other repairs and maintenance expenses are charged to the income statement during the financial period in which they are incurred.
Additionally the cost of an item of property, plant and equipment includes the estimated cost of its dismantlement, removal or restoration.
See Note 29 Other provisions for information about asset retirement obligations and Note 28, Nuclear related assets and liabilities, for information about provisions for decommissioning nuclear power plants.
Land, water areas and waterfall rights are not depreciated since they have indefinite useful lives. Depreciation on other assets is calculated using the straight-line method to allocate their cost to their residual values over their estimated useful lives, as follows:
| Hydro power plant buildings, structures and machinery | 40–50 years |
|---|---|
| Thermal power plant buildings, structures and machinery | 25 years |
| Nuclear power plant buildings, structures and machinery | 25 years |
| CHP power plant buildings, structures and machinery | 15–25 years |
| Substation buildings, structures and machinery | 30–40 years |
| Solar and Wind power plant structures and machinery | 25 years |
| District heating network | 30–40 years |
| Other buildings and structures | 20–40 years |
| Other tangible assets | 20–40 years |
| Other machinery and equipment | 3–20 years |
| Other non-current investments | 5–10 years |
The assets' residual values and useful lives are reviewed, and adjusted if appropriate, at each closing date. An asset's carrying amount is written down immediately to its recoverable amount if the asset's carrying amount is greater than its estimated recoverable amount. See further information on the impairment testing in Note 16.
Grants from the government are recognised at their fair value when there is a reasonable assurance that the grant will be received and the Group will comply with all attached conditions. Government grants relating to costs are deferred and recognised in the income statement over the period necessary to match them with the costs that they are intended to compensate. Government grants relating to the purchase of property, plant and equipment are deducted from the acquisition cost of the asset and are recognised as income by reducing the depreciation charge of the asset they relate to.
Borrowing costs directly attributable to the acquisition, construction or production of qualifying assets are added to the cost of those assets, until such time as the assets are substantially ready for their intended use or sale. Qualifying assets are assets that necessarily take a substantial period of time to get ready for their intended use or sale.
All other borrowing costs are recognised in profit or loss in the period in which they are incurred.
Fortum owns, through its subsidiary Fortum Power and Heat Oy, the coal condensing power plant Meri-Pori in Finland. Teollisuuden Voima Oyj (TVO) has the contractual right to participate in the plant with 45.45%. The capacity and production is divided between Fortum and TVO. Each owner can decide when and how much capacity to use for production. Both Fortum and TVO purchase fuel and emission rights independently. Since Fortum and TVO are sharing control of the power plant, Meri-Pori is accounted for as a joint operation. Fortum is accounting for its part of the investment, i.e. 54.55%. Fortum is also entitled to part of the electricity TVO produces in Meri-Pori through its shareholding of 26.58% of TVO C-series shares.
For further information regarding Fortum's shareholding in TVO, see Note 18 Participations in associated companies and joint ventures.
| Operating and | Consolidated | Notes | Key figures | Parent company | Proposal for the use of the profit | Auditor's | Operational key figures | Investor |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| financial review | financial statements | 2008–2017 | financial statements | shown on the balance sheet | report | Quarterly financial information | information | |
| Basis of preparation | Risks | Income statement | Balance sheet | Off balance sheet items Group structure and related parties |
| Buildings, plants Land and waterfall rights and structures |
Machinery and equipment |
Other tangible assets | Advances paid and construction in progress |
Total | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EUR million | 2017 | 2016 | 2017 | 2016 | 2017 | 2016 | 2017 | 2016 | 2017 | 2016 | 2017 | 2016 |
| Cost 1 January | 2,765 | 2,859 | 3,621 | 3,146 | 7,147 | 5,614 | 135 | 136 | 824 | 755 | 14,492 | 12,510 |
| Translation differences and other adjustments | -89 | -104 | -154 | 146 | -237 | 325 | -2 | -2 | -18 | 66 | -500 | 430 |
| Acquisition of subsidiary companies | 15 | 3 | 161 | 211 | 900 | 954 | 0 | 0 | 32 | 9 | 1,109 | 1,178 |
| Capital expenditure | 2 | 1 | 15 | 38 | 139 | 24 | 0 | 0 | 516 | 526 | 672 | 588 |
| Nuclear asset retirement cost | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | -6 | -6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | -6 | -6 |
| Disposals | -1 | -1 | -21 | -17 | -40 | -41 | -1 | 0 | 1 | -4 | -62 | -63 |
| Sale of subsidiary companies | 0 | 0 | -49 | -46 | -14 | -92 | 0 | 0 | -2 | -2 | -65 | -140 |
| Reclassifications | 3 | 7 | 232 | 142 | 445 | 371 | 31 | 1 | -726 | -525 | -15 | -4 |
| Cost 31 December | 2,694 | 2,765 | 3,805 | 3,621 | 8,335 | 7,147 | 163 | 135 | 627 | 824 | 15,623 | 14,492 |
| Accumulated depreciation 1 January | 0 | 0 | 1,550 | 1,367 | 2,898 | 2,319 | 114 | 113 | 0 | 0 | 4,562 | 3,799 |
| Translation differences and other adjustments | 0 | 0 | -38 | 21 | -72 | 62 | -2 | -2 | 0 | 0 | -112 | 82 |
| Acquisition of subsidiary companies | 0 | 0 | 52 | 97 | 244 | 333 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 297 | 430 |
| Disposals | 0 | 0 | -17 | -14 | -36 | -40 | -1 | -2 | 0 | 0 | -54 | -56 |
| Sale of subsidiary companies | 0 | 0 | -9 | -20 | -3 | -28 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | -12 | -48 |
| Depreciation for the period | 0 | 0 | 112 | 102 | 317 | 246 | 4 | 7 | 1 | 0 | 434 | 355 |
| Reclassifications | 0 | 0 | -21 | -3 | 1 | 5 | 18 | -2 | 0 | 0 | -2 | 0 |
| Accumulated depreciation 31 December | 0 | 0 | 1,629 | 1,550 | 3,349 | 2,898 | 133 | 114 | 1 | 0 | 5,113 | 4,562 |
| BS Carrying amount 31 December | 2,694 | 2,764 | 2,175 | 2,071 | 4,986 | 4,249 | 29 | 21 | 626 | 824 | 10,510 | 9,930 |
The increase of property, plant and equipment arises mainly from the acquisition of Fortum Oslo Varme Group in City Solutions segment in August 2017. The increase was offset by the translation differences in SEK and RUB.
See Note 38 Acquisitions and disposals for additional information on the acquisition of Hafslund Markets Group and Fortum Oslo Varme Group.
Property, plant and equipment that are subject to restrictions in the form of real estate mortgages amount to EUR 318 million (2016: 236). See Note 35 Pledged assets and contingent liabilities.
| Buildings, plants and structures | Machinery and equipment | in progress | Advances paid and construction | Total | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EUR million | 2017 | 2016 | 2017 | 2016 | 2017 | 2016 | 2017 | 2016 |
| 1 January | 55 | 43 | 162 | 132 | 41 | 41 | 258 | 217 |
| Translation differences and other adjustments | -3 | 9 | -11 | 28 | -1 | 6 | -16 | 43 |
| Increases / disposals | 0 | 0 | 10 | 6 | 6 | 10 | 16 | 16 |
| Sale of subsidiary companies | 0 | -1 | 0 | -6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | -7 |
| Reclassification | 10 | 5 | 22 | 9 | -34 | -16 | -3 | -2 |
| Depreciation | -2 | -2 | -8 | -7 | 0 | 0 | -10 | -9 |
| 31 December | 59 | 55 | 175 | 162 | 12 | 41 | 245 | 258 |
Borrowing costs of EUR 16 million were capitalised in 2017 (2016: 16). The interest rate used for capitalisation varied between 2%–12% (2016: 2%–13%).
| Operating and | Consolidated | Notes | Key figures | Parent company | Proposal for the use of the profit | Auditor's | Operational key figures | Investor |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| financial review | financial statements | 2008–2017 | financial statements | shown on the balance sheet | report | Quarterly financial information | information | |
| Basis of preparation | Risks | Income statement | Balance sheet | Off balance sheet items Group structure and related parties |
| Finland | Sweden | Russia | Poland | Norway | Other countries | Total | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EUR million | 2017 | 2016 | 2017 | 2016 | 2017 | 2016 | 2017 | 2016 | 2017 | 2016 | 2017 | 2016 | 2017 | 2016 |
| Generation | ||||||||||||||
| Hydropower | 24 | 29 | 62 | 74 | 87 | 103 | ||||||||
| Nuclear power | 84 | 90 | 84 | 90 | ||||||||||
| Fossil-based electricity | 1 | 0 | 1 | |||||||||||
| Other renewable-based electricity | 1 | 0 | 1 | |||||||||||
| Other | 3 | 2 | 3 | 2 | ||||||||||
| Total Generation | 111 | 122 | 62 | 75 | 174 | 196 | ||||||||
| City Solutions | ||||||||||||||
| Fossil-based heat | 2 | 7 | 3 | 14 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 21 | ||||||
| Fossil-based electricity | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |||||||||
| Renewable, of which | 23 | 17 | 1 | 2 | 72 | 29 | 13 | 4 | 2 | 112 | 50 | |||
| waste | 17 | 9 | 1 | 2 | 72 | 29 | 13 | 3 | 1 | 106 | 42 | |||
| biofuels | 6 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 8 | ||||||||
| other | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||||||||||
| District heat network | 11 | 9 | 13 | 12 | 8 | 6 | 32 | 27 | ||||||
| Other | 4 | 5 | 10 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 19 | 9 | |||||
| Total City Solutions | 41 | 38 | 11 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 90 | 56 | 13 | 0 | 15 | 12 | 170 | 109 |
| Consumer Solutions | ||||||||||||||
| Other | 2 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 7 | 3 | |||||
| Total Consumer Solutions | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 3 |
| Russia | ||||||||||||||
| Fossil-based electricity | 81 | 168 | 81 | 168 | ||||||||||
| Fossil-based heat | 18 | 17 | 18 | 17 | ||||||||||
| Renewable-based electricity, wind | 53 | 15 | 53 | 15 | ||||||||||
| Total Russia | 152 | 201 | 152 | 201 | ||||||||||
| Other | ||||||||||||||
| Renewable-based electricity, wind | 22 | 11 | 24 | 45 | 11 | |||||||||
| Renewable-based electricity, solar | 99 | 43 | 99 | 43 | ||||||||||
| Other | 25 | 13 | 7 | 3 | 7 | 11 | 3 | 1 | 42 | 29 | ||||
| Total Other | 25 | 13 | 28 | 14 | 31 | 11 | 102 | 44 | 187 | 83 | ||||
| Total | 179 | 173 | 104 | 91 | 152 | 201 | 92 | 59 | 46 | 11 | 115 | 56 | 690 | 591 |
| Of which investments in CO2 free production | 115 | 127 | 84 | 85 | 53 | 15 | 0 | 0 | 24 | 0 | 99 | 43 | 375 | 270 |
1) Includes capital expenditure to both intangible assets and property, plant and equipment.
2017
In Finland, Fortum invested EUR 84 million (2016: 90) into the Loviisa nuclear power plant. Fortum invested additionally EUR 88 million (2016: 103) into hydro production, mainly maintenance, legislation and productivity investments. The biggest of these were Långströmmen dam safety EUR 9 million in Sweden and Imatra dam safety EUR 9 million in Finland. Investments in CO2 free production were EUR 171 million (2016: 193).
Growth investments in City Solutions totalled EUR 107 million (2016: 66) in year 2017. Maintenance, legislation and productivity investments totalled EUR 62 million (2016: 42). This amount consists mainly of investments in district heat networks and plants as well as the maintenance of existing CHP plants and measures defined by legal requirements. The largest investment project in 2017 was the new CHP plant in Zabrze, Poland. Investments in CO2 free production were EUR 7 million (2016: 8).
Investments in Consumer solutions totalled EUR 7 million (2016: 3). The amount consists mainly of new product development costs.
Growth investments in Russia totalled EUR 96 million (2016: 152). The largest growth investments were into the wind power farm in Ulyanovsk and Chelyabinsk GRES 3. Additionally, EUR 56 million (2016: 49) was invested in maintenance, legislation and productivity projects. Investments in CO2 free production were EUR 53 million (2016:15).
Other Division,s investments contain solar investments in India EUR 99 million (2016: 43) and investments in wind power production EUR 45 million (2016:11). Wind investments contain Solberg wind park in Sweden, as well as Anstadblåheia and Sorfjord wind parks in Norway. Other Division invested also in Charge and Drive EUR 13 million (2016: 12), mainly charging poles in Norway. Investments in CO2 free production were EUR 144 million (2016:54).
The Group's interests in associated companies and jointly controlled entities are accounted for using the equity method of accounting. Assets acquired and liabilities assumed in the investment in associates or joint ventures are measured initially at their fair values at the acquisition date. The excess of the cost of acquisition over the fair value of the Group's share of the identifiable net assets acquired is recorded as goodwill. If the cost of acquisition is less than the fair value of the net assets of the associate or joint venture acquired, the difference is recognised directly in the income statement.
The Group's share of its associates or joint ventures post-acquisition profits or losses after tax and the expenses related to the adjustments to the fair values of the assets and liabilities assumed are recognised in the income statement. The cumulative post-acquisition movements are adjusted against the carrying amount of the investment. The Group's share of post-acquisition adjustments to associates or joint ventures equity that has not been recognised in the associates or joint ventures income statement, is recognised directly in Group's shareholder's equity and against the carrying amount of the investment.
When the Group's share of losses in an associate or a joint venture equals or exceeds its interest in the associate or joint venture, including any other unsecured receivables, the Group does not recognise further losses, unless it has incurred obligations or made payments on behalf of the associate or joint venture.
Unrealised gains on transactions between the Group and its associates or joint ventures are eliminated to the extent of the Group's interest in the associate or joint venture. Unrealised losses are also eliminated unless the transaction provides evidence of an impairment of the asset transferred. Accounting policies of associates or joint ventures have been changed where necessary to ensure consistency with the policies adopted by the Group.
If more recent information is not available, the share of the profit of certain associated or joint venture companies is included in the consolidated accounts based on the latest available information.
Management is required to make significant judgements when assessing the nature of Fortum's interest in its investees and when considering the classification of Fortum's joint arrangements. In the classification, emphasis has been put on decision-making, legal structure and financing of the arrangements.
Management judgement is required when testing the carrying amounts for participations in associated companies and joint ventures for impairment. See Note 16 Property, plant and equipment for more information.
| OKG AB | Forsmarks Kraftgrupp AB |
Kemijoki Oy | TGC-1 | TVO | Fortum Värme |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Holding | Holding | |||||
| Power | Power | Power | in energy | Power | in power | |
| Nature of the | production | production | production | company | production | and heat |
| relationship | company | company | company | (listed) | company | company |
| Associated | Associated | Associated | Associated | Joint venture | Joint venture | |
| Classification | company | company | company | company | ||
| Segment | Generation | Generation | Generation | Russia | Generation City Solutions | |
| Domicile | Sweden | Sweden | Finland | Russia | Finland | Sweden |
| Ownership interest, % 1) |
46 | 26 | 59 | 29 | 26 | 50 |
| Votes, % | 46 | 26 | 28 | 29 | 26 | 50 |
1) Kemijoki and TVO have different series of shares. The ownership interest varies due to the changes in equity assigned to the different share series. The ownership interests for 2016 for Kemijoki Oy and TVO were 60% and 26% respectively.
Power plants are often built jointly with other power producers. Under the consortium agreements, each owner is entitled to electricity in proportion to its share of ownership or other agreements and each owner is liable for an equivalent portion of costs. The production companies are not profit making, since the owners purchase electricity at production cost including interest cost and production taxes. The share of profit of these companies is mainly IFRS adjustments (e.g. accounting for nuclear related assets and liabilities) and depreciations on fair value adjustments from historical acquisitions since the companies are not profit making under local accounting principles.
Fortum has material shareholdings in such power production companies (mainly nuclear and hydro) that are consolidated using equity method either as associated companies (OKG AB, Forsmarks Kraftgrupp AB and Kemijoki Oy) or in some cases as joint ventures (Teollisuuden Voima Oyj (TVO)).
In Sweden nuclear production company shareholdings are 45.5% ownership of the shares in OKG AB and 25.5% ownership of the shares in Forsmarks Kraftgrupp AB. Excluding non-controlling interests in the subsidiaries, Fortum's participation in the companies are 43.4% and 22.2% respectively, which reflects the share of electricity produced that Fortum can sell further to the market. The minority part of the electricity purchased is invoiced further to each minority owner according to their respective shareholding and treated as pass-through. OKG AB and Forsmarks Kraftgrupp AB are accounted for as associated companies as Fortum has a representation on the Board of Directors and it participates in policy-making processes of the companies.
1
| Operating and | Consolidated | Notes | Key figures | Parent company | Proposal for the use of the profit | Auditor's | Operational key figures | Investor |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| financial review | financial statements | 2008–2017 | financial statements | shown on the balance sheet | report | Quarterly financial information | information | |
| Basis of preparation | Risks | Income statement | Balance sheet | Off balance sheet items Group structure and related parties |
In Finland Fortum has an ownership in power production company TVO that has three series of shares which entitle the shareholders to electricity produced in the different power plants owned by TVO.
Shares in series A entitle to electricity produced in nuclear power plants Olkiluoto 1 and 2 and Fortum owns 26.6% of these shares. Series B entitles to electricity in the nuclear power plant presently being built, Olkiluoto 3, and Fortum's ownership in this share series is 25%. Series C entitles to electricity produced in TVO's share of the coal condensing power plant Meri-Pori, and Fortum's ownership in this share series is 26.6%. The Meri-Pori power plant is accounted for as a joint operation in Fortum.
See also Associated companies in Note 36 Legal actions and official proceedings and Joint operations in the accounting principles in Note 17 Property, plant and equipment.
The most significant hydro production company shareholding is 63.8% of the hydro shares and 28.27% of the monetary shares in Kemijoki Oy. Each owner of hydro shares is entitled to the hydropower production in proportion to its hydro shareholding. Since Fortum has a representation on the Board of Directors and it participates in the policy-making processes, Kemijoki Oy is accounted for as an associated company.
In Sweden Fortum has a 50% ownership in AB Fortum Värme Holding samägt med Stockholms stad (Fortum Värme) that is co-owned with the City of Stockholm through Stockholms Stadshus AB. Fortum Värme produces district heating, district cooling and electricity and supplies heat and cooling to customers in the Stockholm area.
Fortum owns shareholdings in listed companies such as Territorial Generating Company 1 (TGC-1). The shareholding in TGC-1 is accounted for as an associated company as Fortum has representatives in the Board of Directors of the company. The share of profit of TGC-1 is accounted for based on previous quarter information since updated interim information is not normally available.
In August 2017 Fortum sold its 34.1% stake in Hafslund ASA to the City of Oslo in connection with the restructuring of the ownership in Hafslund. Hafslund ASA was accounted for as an associated company and the share of profits is accounted for according to the latest quarter information available.
Impact of different accounting principles presented in the tables below on the line Fair values on acquisitions and different accounting principles include mainly IFRS adjustments for Nuclear liabilities and assets and capitalised borrowing costs in Swedish associates. Fortum records its share of nuclear related assets and liabilities in its nuclear associated companies according to equity method. The basis for recognition is similar as for Loviisa power plant, see accounting principles in Note 28 Nuclear related assets and liabilities.
| EUR million | OKG AB | Forsmarks Kraftgrupp |
AB Kemijoki Oy | Hafslund ASA 2) |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Balance sheet | 31 Dec 2016 31 Dec 2016 31 Dec 2016 30 Jun 2017 30 Sept 2017 | TGC-1 | |||
| Non-current assets | 628 | 2,367 | 465 | 2,329 | 1,938 |
| Current assets | 428 | 466 | 12 | 325 | 312 |
| Non-current liabilities | 961 | 2,599 | 264 | 1,091 | 420 |
| Current liabilities | 82 | 198 | 144 | 585 | 168 |
| Equity | 13 | 36 | 69 | 978 | 1,663 |
| Attributable to NCI | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 123 |
| Attributable to the owners of the parent |
13 | 36 | 69 | 978 | 1,540 |
| Statement of comprehensive income | 1 Jan 2016– 31 Dec 2016 |
1 Jan 2016– 31 Dec 2016 |
1 Jan 2016– 31 Dec 2016 |
1 Oct 2016– 30 June 2017 |
1 Oct 2016– 30 Sept 2017 |
| Revenue | 430 | 756 | 55 | 1,240 | 1,289 |
| Profit or loss from continuing operations | 1 | 0 | -10 | 118 | 81 |
| Other comprehensive income | 0 | 0 | 0 | -12 | 1 |
| Total comprehensive income | 1 | 0 | -10 | 105 | 82 |
| Attributable to NCI | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | -1 |
| Attributable to the owners of the parent |
1 | 0 | -10 | 105 | 83 |
| Reconciliation to carrying amount in the Fortum group |
|||||
| Group's interest in the equity of the associate at 1 January 2017 |
6 | 10 | 48 | 349 | 471 |
| Change in share of profit and from OCI items |
0 | 0 | -6 | 36 | 32 |
| Dividends received | 0 | 0 | 0 | -23 | -5 |
| Divestments | 0 | 0 | 0 | -363 | 0 |
| Translation differences and other adjustments |
0 | -1 | 0 | 1 | -44 |
| Group's interest in the equity of the associate at 31 December 2017 |
6 | 9 | 41 | 0 | 454 |
| Fair values on acquisitions and different accounting principles |
16 | 92 | 157 | 0 | -25 |
| Carrying amount at 31 December 2017 |
22 | 101 | 197 | 0 | 429 |
| Market value for listed shares 1) | 196 |
1) The market quotation for the TGC-1 share is affected by the low liquidity of the TGC-1 shares in the Russian stock exchanges. During 2017 trading volumes of TGC-1 shares in relation to the number of shares of the company were approximately 10% (2016: 12%).
2) Divested in August 2017, see also Note 38 Acquisition and disposals.
| Operating and | Consolidated | Notes | Key figures | Parent company | Proposal for the use of the profit | Auditor's | Operational key figures | Investor |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| financial review | financial statements | 2008–2017 | financial statements | shown on the balance sheet | report | Quarterly financial information | information | |
| Basis of preparation | Risks | Income statement | Balance sheet | Off balance sheet items Group structure and related parties |
| EUR million | OKG AB | Forsmarks Kraftgrupp |
AB Kemijoki Oy | Hafslund ASA |
TGC-1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Balance sheet | 31 Dec 2015 31 Dec 2015 31 Dec 2015 30 Sept 2016 30 Sept 2016 | ||||
| Non-current assets | 645 | 2,361 | 465 | 2,442 | 2,113 |
| Current assets | 448 | 440 | 9 | 303 | 332 |
| Non-current liabilities | 611 | 2,578 | 306 | 1,254 | 382 |
| Current liabilities | 469 | 186 | 88 | 468 | 332 |
| Equity | 13 | 37 | 80 | 1,023 | 1,732 |
| Attributable to NCI | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 134 |
| Attributable to the owners of the parent |
13 | 37 | 80 | 1,022 | 1,598 |
| Statement of comprehensive income | 1 Jan 2015– 31 Dec 2015 |
1 Jan 2015– 31 Dec 2015 |
1 Jan 2015– 31 Dec 2015 |
1 Oct 2015– 30 Sept 2016 |
1 Oct 2015– 30 Sept 2016 |
| Revenue | 1,987 | 695 | 60 | 1,393 | 1,032 |
| Profit or loss from continuing operations | 1 | 1 | -3 | 154 | 116 |
| Other comprehensive income | 0 | 0 | 0 | 13 | -2 |
| Total comprehensive income | 1 | 1 | -3 | 167 | 114 |
| Attributable to NCI | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | -3 |
| Attributable to the owners of the | |||||
| parent | 1 | 1 | -3 | 167 | 117 |
| Reconciliation to carrying amount in the Fortum group |
|||||
| Group's interest in the equity of the associate at 1 January 2016 |
6 | 10 | 46 | 297 | 347 |
| Change in share of profit and from OCI | |||||
| items | 0 | 0 | -1 | 56 | 33 |
| Dividends received | 0 | 0 | 0 | -21 | -4 |
| Translation differences and other | |||||
| adjustments | 0 | 0 | 3 | 16 | 95 |
| Group's interest in the equity of the associate at 31 December 2016 |
6 | 10 | 48 | 349 | 471 |
| Fair values on acquisitions and different accounting principles |
8 | 90 | 158 | 8 | -34 |
| Carrying amount at 31 December 2016 |
14 | 100 | 206 | 356 | 436 |
| Market value for listed shares | 693 | 265 |
| Summarised financial information of the principal joint ventures in 2017 and 2016 | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2017 | 2016 | |||||||||
| EUR million | TVO | Fortum Värme |
TVO | Fortum Värme |
||||||
| Balance sheet | 30 Sept 2017 31 Dec 2017 30 Sept 2016 31 Dec 2016 | |||||||||
| Non-current assets | 6,900 | 2,642 | 7,098 | 2,692 | ||||||
| Current assets | 606 | 266 | 413 | 271 | ||||||
| of which cash and cash equivalents | 192 | 15 | 129 | 13 | ||||||
| Non-current liabilities | 5,159 | 1,461 | 5,280 | 1,488 | ||||||
| of which non-current interest-bearing liabilities | 4,186 | 1,071 | 4,318 | 1,105 | ||||||
| Current liabilities | 673 | 230 | 659 | 298 | ||||||
| of which current financial liabilities | 484 | 112 | 466 | 164 | ||||||
| Equity 1) | 1,674 | 1,216 | 1,573 | 1,176 | ||||||
| Attributable to NCI | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||||||
| Attributable to the shareholders of the company | 1,674 | 1,216 | 1,573 | 1,176 | ||||||
| Statement of comprehensive income | 1 Oct 2016– 30 Sept 2017 |
1 Jan 2017– 31 Dec 2017 |
1 Oct 2015– 30 Sept 2016 |
1 Jan 2016– 31 Dec 2016 |
||||||
| Revenue | 343 | 689 | 322 | 699 | ||||||
| Depreciation and amortisation | -56 | -139 | -54 | -125 | ||||||
| Interest income | 14 | 0 | 17 | 0 | ||||||
| Interest expense | -46 | -17 | -44 | -13 | ||||||
| Income tax expense or income | 0 | -35 | 0 | -33 | ||||||
| Profit or loss from continuing operations | -4 | 125 | -23 | 124 | ||||||
| Other comprehensive income | 9 | -7 | -27 | 4 | ||||||
| Total comprehensive income | 5 | 118 | -51 | 128 | ||||||
| Attributable to NCI | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||||||
| Attributable to the shareholders of the company | 5 | 117 | -51 | 128 | ||||||
| Reconciliation to carrying amount in the Fortum group | ||||||||||
| Group's interest in the equity of the joint venture | ||||||||||
| at 1 January | 279 | 588 | 294 | 567 | ||||||
| Change in share of profit and from OCI items | 0 | 59 | -14 | 64 | ||||||
| Dividends received | 0 | -21 | 0 | -21 | ||||||
| Translation differences and other adjustments | 0 | -18 | 0 | -21 | ||||||
| Group's interest in the equity of the joint venture at 31 December |
280 | 608 | 279 | 588 | ||||||
| Fair values on acquisitions and different accounting principles 2) |
-11 | -75 | -6 | -81 | ||||||
| Carrying amount at 31 December | 269 | 533 | 274 | 507 | ||||||
1) The equity of TVO includes subordinated loans of EUR 579 million (2016: 479). Fortum has given part of these loans, pro rata to the ownership.
2) Impact of different accounting principles include mainly IFRS adjustments for Nuclear liabilities and assets and capitalised borrowing costs. Fortum records its share of nuclear related assets and liabilities in its nuclear associated companies according to equity method. The basis for recognition is similar as for Loviisa power plant, see accounting principles in Note 28 Nuclear related assets and liabilities.
| Operating and financial review |
Consolidated | financial statements | Notes | Key figures 2008–2017 |
Parent company financial statements |
Proposal for the use of the profit shown on the balance sheet |
Auditor's report |
Operational key figures Quarterly financial information |
Investor information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Basis of preparation | Risks | Income statement | Balance sheet | Off balance sheet items Group structure and related parties |
| EUR million | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|
| Principal associates | 749 | 1,111 |
| Principal joint ventures | 802 | 781 |
| Other associates | 121 | 42 |
| Other joint ventures | 229 | 178 |
| BS Carrying amount 31 December | 1,900 | 2,112 |
| Joint ventures |
Associated companies |
Joint ventures |
Associated companies |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EUR million | 2017 | 2017 | 2016 | 2016 |
| Historical cost | ||||
| 1 January | 636 | 864 | 558 | 800 |
| Translation differences and other adjustments | -8 | -30 | -8 | 64 |
| Acquisitions | 52 | 83 | 17 | 0 |
| Reclassifications | -81 | -1 | 83 | -1 |
| Divestments | 0 | -236 | -14 | 0 |
| Historical cost 31 December | 598 | 680 | 636 | 864 |
| Equity adjustments | ||||
| 1 January | 324 | 289 | 388 | 213 |
| Translation differences and other adjustments | -13 | -18 | -16 | 41 |
| Share of profits of associates and joint ventures | 75 | 73 | 69 | 62 |
| Reclassifications | 81 | 1 | -83 | 1 |
| Divestments | 0 | -128 | -8 | 0 |
| Dividends received | -29 | -29 | -28 | -26 |
| OCI items associated companies and joint ventures | -5 | 2 | 1 | -2 |
| Equity adjustments 31 December | 432 | 190 | 324 | 289 |
| Carrying amount at 31 December | 1,031 | 870 | 959 | 1,153 |
For information about investments and divestments of shares in associated companies, see Note 38 Acquisitions and disposals.
| 2016 | |
|---|---|
| -30 | |
| 6 | |
| -3 | |
| 51 | |
| 38 | |
| 62 | |
| 66 | |
| -7 | |
| 59 | |
| 0 | |
| 12 | 10 |
| 148 | 131 |
| 2017 8 2 -9 39 32 73 66 -4 63 0 |
The unrecognized share of losses of associated companies and joint ventures (for the reporting period and cumulatively) is zero.
Share of profits from Teollisuuden Voima Oyj, Forsmarks Kraftgrupp AB and OKG AB includes EUR 13 million (2016: -30) arising from accounting of nuclear related assets and liabilities.
| EUR million | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|
| Sales to associated companies | 1 | 1 |
| Interest on associated company loan receivables | 12 | 14 |
| Purchases from associated companies | 319 | 385 |
Purchases from joint ventures include mainly purchases of nuclear and hydro power at production cost including interest costs and production taxes.
1
| Operating and | Consolidated | Notes | Key figures | Parent company | Proposal for the use of the profit | Auditor's | Operational key figures | Investor |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| financial review | financial statements | 2008–2017 | financial statements | shown on the balance sheet | report | Quarterly financial information | information | |
| Basis of preparation | Risks | Income statement | Balance sheet | Off balance sheet items Group structure and related parties |
| EUR million | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|
| Receivables from associated companies | ||
| Long-term interest-bearing loan receivables | 656 | 704 |
| Trade receivables | 1 | 1 |
| Other receivables | 1 | 0 |
| Liabilities to associated companies | ||
| Long-term loan payables | 2 | 5 |
| Trade payables | 0 | 1 |
For more info about receivables from associated companies, see Note 20 Interest-bearing receivables.
| EUR million | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|
| Sales to joint ventures | 109 | 104 |
| Interest income on joint venture loan receivables | 1 | 2 |
| Purchases from joint ventures | 153 | 151 |
Purchases from joint ventures include mainly purchases of nuclear and hydro power at production cost including interest costs and production taxes.
| EUR million | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|
| Receivables from joint ventures | ||
| Long-term interest-bearing loan receivables | 208 | 182 |
| Finance lease receivable from joint ventures | 41 | - |
| Trade receivables | 23 | 19 |
| Other receivables | 17 | 16 |
| Liabilities to joint ventures | ||
| Long-term loan payables | 285 | 273 |
| Trade payables | 19 | 6 |
| Other payables | 7 | 6 |
For more info about receivables from joint ventures, see Note 20 Interest-bearing receivables.
| EUR million | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|
| Available-for-sale financial assets | 65 | 58 |
| Other | 74 | 55 |
| BS Total | 140 | 113 |
Available-for-sale financial assets, i.e. shares which are not classified as associated companies or joint ventures, consist mainly of shares in unlisted companies of EUR 65 million (2016: 58), for which the fair value can not be reliably determined. These assets are measured at cost less possible impairment.
Fortum decided in 2015 to participate in the Fennovoima nuclear power project in Finland with a 6.6% share. The participation is carried out through Voimaosakeyhtiö SF and the book value of the shares is EUR 25 million (2016: 18). The indirect investment in Fennovoima is classified as Available-for-sale financial assets, measured at cost, since fair value cannot be reliably determined.
| EUR million | Carrying amount 2017 |
Fair value 2017 |
Carrying amount 2016 |
Fair value 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-term loan receivables from associated companies | 656 | 689 | 704 | 744 |
| Long-term loan receivables from joint ventures | 208 | 229 | 182 | 206 |
| Finance lease receivables from joint ventures | 41 | 41 | - | - |
| Other long-term interest-bearing receivables | 106 | 111 | 99 | 99 |
| BS Total long-term interest-bearing receivables | 1,010 | 1,071 | 985 | 1,049 |
| Other short-term interest-bearing receivables | 395 | 395 | 395 | 395 |
| Total short-term interest-bearing receivables | 395 | 395 | 395 | 395 |
| Total | 1,406 | 1,466 | 1,380 | 1,444 |
Long-term loan receivables include receivables from associated companies and joint ventures EUR 864 million (Dec 31 2016: 886). These receivables include EUR 638 million (Dec 31 2016: 686) from Swedish nuclear companies, OKG AB and Forsmarks Kraftgrupp AB, which are mainly funded with shareholder loans, pro rata each shareholder's ownership.
Teollisuuden Voima Oyj (TVO) is building Olkiluoto 3, the nuclear power plant, which is funded through external loans, share issues and shareholder loans according to shareholders' agreement between the owners of TVO. At end of December 2017 Fortum has EUR 145 million (2016: 120) outstanding receivables regarding Olkiluoto 3 and is additionally committed to provide at maximum EUR 88 million, of which 38 million is the Fortum share of a new shareholder loan commitment totalling EUR 150 million signed by all TVO shareholders in December 2017.
Finance leases relate to heat pipelines in Tyumen area, which are leased to newly established joint venture YUSTEK.
Interest-bearing receivables includes also EUR 102 million (2016: 131) from SIBUR, a Russian gas processing and petrochemicals company regarding divested shares of OOO Tobolsk CHP.
Short-term interest-bearing receivables include EUR 363 million (2016: 360) restricted cash mainly given as collateral for commodity exchanges. The new European Market Infrastructure Regulation (EMIR) came into force in 2016 requiring fully-backed guarantees.
For further information regarding credit risk management, see Note 3.7 Credit risk.
| Repricing | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EUR million | Effective interest rate, % |
Carrying amount 2017 |
Under 1 year |
1–5 years |
Over 5 years |
Fair value 2017 |
Carrying amount 2016 |
Fair value 2016 |
| Long-term loan receivables | 2.8 | 1,010 | 835 | 59 | 116 1,071 | 985 | 1,049 | |
| Short-term receivables | 0.5 | 395 | 395 | - | - | 395 | 395 | 395 |
| Total interest bearing receivables |
2.1 | 1,406 | 1,231 | 59 | 116 1,466 | 1,380 | 1,444 |
Inventories mainly consist of fuels consumed in the production process or in the rendering of services. Inventories are stated at the lower of cost and net realisable value being the estimated selling price for the end product, less applicable variable selling expenses and other production costs. Cost is determined using the first-in, first-out (FIFO) method.
Inventories which are acquired primarily for the purpose of trading are stated at fair value less selling expenses.
| EUR million | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|
| Nuclear fuel | 83 | 91 |
| Coal | 45 | 51 |
| Oil | 7 | 7 |
| Biofuels | 3 | 3 |
| Materials and spare parts | 54 | 67 |
| Other inventories | 25 | 12 |
| BS Total | 216 | 233 |
Write downs in inventories amounted to EUR 0 million (2016: 1).
Trade receivables include revenue based on an estimate of electricity, heat and cooling already delivered but not yet measured and not yet invoiced.
| EUR million | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|
| Trade receivables | 743 | 562 |
| Accrued interest income | 1 | 1 |
| Accrued income and prepaid expenses | 29 | 31 |
| Other receivables | 224 | 249 |
| BS Total | 997 | 844 |
The management considers that the carrying amount of trade and other receivables approximates their fair value.
| 2017 | 2016 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EUR million | Gross | Impaired | Gross | Impaired |
| Not past due | 632 | 2 | 471 | 2 |
| Past due 1–90 days | 90 | 4 | 85 | 5 |
| Past due 91–180 days | 19 | 3 | 15 | 5 |
| Past due more than 181 days | 68 | 57 | 85 | 80 |
| Total | 809 | 66 | 655 | 93 |
Impairment losses recognised in the income statement were EUR 9 million (2016: 28), of which EUR 8 million (2016: 24) are impairment losses recognised in the PAO Fortum Group. Impairment losses were offset by recovery of previously impaired trade receivables EUR 25 million (2016: 3), of which EUR 24 million (2016: 3) are recognised in the PAO Fortum Group. On 31 December 2017, trade receivables of EUR 66 million (2016: 93) are impaired and provided for, of which EUR 50 million (2016: 79) refers to the PAO Fortum Group.
| EUR million | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|
| EUR | 206 | 251 |
| SEK | 137 | 97 |
| RUB | 207 | 215 |
| NOK | 177 | 11 |
| PLN | 69 | 71 |
| Other | 13 | 10 |
| Total | 809 | 655 |
Trade receivables are arising from a large number of customers mainly in EUR, SEK, RUB and NOK mitigating the concentration of risk.
For further information regarding credit risk management and credit risks, see Counterparty risks in the Operating and financial review and Note 3.7 Credit risk.
38 39 40
Parent company financial statements Proposal for the use of the profit shown on the balance sheet
Auditor's report
Operational key figures Quarterly financial information Investor information
Basis of preparation Risks Income statement Balance sheet Off balance sheet items Group structure and related parties
Cash and cash equivalents in Liquid funds include cash in hand, deposits held at call with banks and other short-term, highly liquid investments with maturities of three months or less. Deposits and securities with maturity more than 3 months include fixed term deposits and commercial papers with maturity more than three months but less than twelve months. Deposits and securities are classified as available-for-sale financial assets.
Bank overdrafts are shown within borrowings in current liabilities in the balance sheet. Cash collaterals or otherwise restricted cash are treated as short-term interest-bearing receivables.
| EUR million | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|
| Cash at bank and in hand | 1,928 | 1,444 |
| Deposits and securities with maturity under 3 months | 1,253 | 235 |
| Cash and cash equivalents | 3,182 | 1,679 |
| Deposits and securities with maturity more than 3 months | 715 | 3,475 |
| BS Total | 3,897 | 5,155 |
Liquid funds consists of deposits and cash in bank accounts amounting to EUR 3,540 million and commercial papers EUR 357 million. The average interest rate on deposits and securities excl. Russian deposits on 31 December 2017 was -0.27% (2016: -0.01%). Liquid funds held by PAO Fortum amounted to EUR 246 million (2016: 105), of which EUR 231 million (2016: 103) was held as bank deposits. The average interest rate for this portfolio was 6.1% at the balance sheet date.
Liquid funds totalling EUR 3,348 million (2016: 4,663) are placed with counterparties that have an investment grade rating. In addition, EUR 549 million (2016: 377) have been placed with counterparties separately reviewed and approved by the Group's credit control department.
The committed and undrawn credit facilities amounted to EUR 1,800 million (2016: 1,963), excluding committed credit facilities for Fortum's offer for Uniper shares. In relation to offer for Uniper shares Fortum has commitments from 10 relationship banks to provide credit facilities at the request of Fortum in an aggregate amount of up to EUR 12,000 million.
For further information regarding credit risk management and credit risks, see Note 3.7 Credit risk.
| 2017 | 2016 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EUR million | Number of shares |
Share capital |
Number of shares |
Share capital |
|
| Registered shares at 1 January | 888,367,045 | 3,046 888,367,045 | 3,046 | ||
| Registered shares at 31 December | 888,367,045 | 3,046 888,367,045 | 3,046 |
Fortum Corporation has one class of shares. By the end of 2017, a total of 888,367,045 shares had been issued. Each share entitles the holder to one vote at the Annual General Meeting. All shares entitle holders to an equal dividend. At the end of 2017 Fortum Corporation's share capital, paid in its entirety and entered in the trade register, was EUR 3,046,185,953.00.
Fortum Corporation's shares are listed on Nasdaq Helsinki. The trading code is FORTUM (FUM1V before 25 January 2017). Fortum Corporation's shares are in the Finnish book entry system maintained by Euroclear Finland Ltd.
Details on the President and CEO and other members of the Fortum Executive Management Team's shareholdings and interest in the equity incentive schemes is presented in Note 10 Employee benefits.
On 4 April 2017, the Annual General Meeting decided to authorise the Board of Directors to decide on the repurchase and disposal of the company's own shares up to a maximum number of 20,000,000 shares, which corresponds to approximately 2.25% of all the shares in the company. The authorisation is effective for a period of 18 months from the resolution of the General Meeting. The authorisation had not been used by the end of 2017.
Fortum Corporation has not issued any convertible bonds or bonds with attached warrants, which would entitle the bearer to subscribe for Fortum shares. The Board of Directors of Fortum Corporation has no unused authorisations from the General Meeting of shareholders to issue convertible bond loans or bonds with warrants or increase the company's share capital.
| EUR million | 2017 | 2016 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| PAO Fortum Group | Russia | 37 | 37 |
| AS Fortum Tartu Group | Estonia | 34 | 30 |
| Fortum Oslo Varme AS Group | Norway | 150 | - |
| Other | 18 | 17 | |
| BS Total | 239 | 84 |
Non-controlling interests have increased with EUR 155 million during 2017 mainly due to the acquisition of Fortum Oslo Varme AS which is consolidated as a subsidiary with 50% non-controlling interest. See also Note 38 Acquisitions and disposals.
Borrowings are recognised initially at fair value less transaction costs incurred. In subsequent periods, they are stated at amortised cost; any difference between proceeds (net of transaction costs) and the redemption value is recognised as interest cost over the period of the borrowing using the effective interest method. Borrowings or portion of borrowings being hedged with a fair value hedge are recognised at fair value.
| EUR million | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|
| Interest-bearing liabilities | 4,885 | 5,107 |
| Liquid funds | 3,897 | 5,155 |
| Net debt | 988 | -48 |
Net debt is calculated as interest-bearing liabilities less liquid funds without deducting interest-bearing receivables amounting to EUR 1,406 million (Dec 31 2016: 1,380). Interest-bearing receivables mainly consist of shareholder loans to partly owned nuclear companies regarded long-term financing. For more information see Note 20 Interest-bearing receivables.
| EUR million | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|
| Bonds | 2,521 | 2,986 |
| Loans from financial institutions | 155 | 247 |
| Reborrowing from the Finnish State Nuclear Waste Management Fund | 1,129 | 1,094 |
| Other long-term interest-bearing debt | 314 | 140 |
| BS Total long-term interest-bearing debt | 4,119 | 4,468 |
| Current portion of long-term bonds | 422 | 343 |
| Current portion of loans from financial institutions | 129 | 145 |
| Current portion of other long-term interest-bearing debt | 10 | 11 |
| Other short-term interest-bearing debt | 206 | 140 |
| BS Total short-term interest bearing debt | 766 | 639 |
| Total interest-bearing debt | 4,885 | 5,107 |
| Operating and | Consolidated | Notes | Key figures | Parent company | Proposal for the use of the profit | Auditor's | Operational key figures | Investor |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| financial review | financial statements | 2008–2017 | financial statements | shown on the balance sheet | report | Quarterly financial information | information | |
| Basis of preparation | Risks | Income statement | Balance sheet | Off balance sheet items Group structure and related parties |
| Repricing | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EUR million | Effective interest rate, % |
Carrying amount 2017 |
Under 1 year | 1–5 years | Over 5 years | Fair value 2017 |
Carrying amount 2016 |
Fair value 2016 |
| Bonds | 3.3 | 2,943 | 523 | 2,323 | 97 | 3,143 | 3,329 | 3,609 |
| Loans from financial institutions | 4.8 | 283 | 283 | - | - | 303 | 393 | 425 |
| Reborrowing from the Finnish State Nuclear Waste Management Fund | 0.5 | 1,129 | - | - | 1,129 | 1,192 | 1,094 | 1,156 |
| Other long-term interest-bearing debt 1) | 3.4 | 324 | 223 | - | 102 | 373 | 151 | 157 |
| Total long-term interest-bearing debt 2) | 2.7 | 4,679 | 1,029 | 2,323 | 1,327 | 5,011 | 4,967 | 5,348 |
| Other short-term interest-bearing debt | 1.2 | 206 | 206 | - | - | 207 | 140 | 140 |
| Total short-term interest-bearing debt | 1.2 | 206 | 206 | - | - | 207 | 140 | 140 |
| Total interest-bearing debt 3) | 2.6 | 4,885 | 1,235 | 2,323 | 1,327 | 5,218 | 5,107 | 5,488 |
1) Includes loans from Finnish pension institutions EUR 48 million (2016: 58) and other loans EUR 276 million (2016: 93).
2) Including current portion of long-term debt.
3) The average interest rate on loans and derivatives on 31 December 2017 was 3.6% (2016: 3.5%).
| Non-cash changes | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EUR million | 31 Dec 2016 |
Cash flow from financing activities 1) |
Acqui sitions |
Exchange rate differences |
Fair value changes and amortised cost |
31 Dec 2017 |
| Bonds | 3,329 | -343 | -16 | -27 | 2,943 | |
| Loans from financial institutions | 393 | -144 | 42 | -8 | 283 | |
| Reborrowing from the Finnish State Nuclear Waste Management Fund |
1,094 | 35 | 1,129 | |||
| Other interest-bearing debt | 291 | 13 | 233 | -8 | 530 | |
| Total interest-bearing debt | 5,107 | -439 | 275 | -31 | -27 | 4,885 |
1) Repayments and borrowings.
The interest-bearing debt decreased in 2017 by EUR 222 million to EUR 4,885 million (2016: 5,107). The amount of short-term financing increased with EUR 66 million, and at the end of the year the amount of short-term financing EUR 206 million (2016: 140) included 113 million (2016: 135) from Credit Support Annex agreements.
During the first quarter of 2017 Fortum increased the amount of reborrowing from the Finnish State Nuclear Waste Management Fund and TVO by EUR 35 million to EUR 1,129 million. In March Fortum repaid two SEK bonds equivalent to EUR 290 million (SEK 2,750 million). During the second quarter Fortum repaid a NOK bond equivalent to EUR 53 million (NOK 500 million) and a bilateral SEK loan to NIB equivalent to EUR 78 million (SEK 750 million). A shareholder loan was given by the City of Oslo to Fortum Oslo Varme AS as a part of the whole Hafslund restructuring amounting to EUR 213 million (NOK 2,000 million). Fortum Oslo Varme is financed on pro rata basis.
The average interest rate for the portfolio consisting mainly of EUR and SEK loans was 2.4% at the balance sheet date (2016: 2.1%). Part of the external loans EUR 773 million (2016: 805) have been swapped to RUB and the average interest cost for these loans including cost for hedging the RUB was 9.5% at the balance sheet date (2016: 11.4%). The average interest rate on total loans and derivatives at the balance sheet date was 3.6% (2016: 3.5%).
For more information please see Note 3 Financial risk management and Note 35 Pledged assets and contingent liabilities.
| Operating and | Consolidated | Notes | Key figures | Parent company | Proposal for the use of the profit | Auditor's | Operational key figures | Investor |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| financial review | financial statements | 2008–2017 | financial statements | shown on the balance sheet | report | Quarterly financial information | information | |
| Basis of preparation | Risks | Income statement | Balance sheet | Off balance sheet items Group structure and related parties |
| Issued/Maturity | Interest basis | Interest rate, % | Effective interest, % | Currency | Nominal value, million Carrying amount, EUR million | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fortum Corporation EUR 8,000 million EMTN | ||||||
| Programme 1) | ||||||
| 2009/2019 | Fixed | 6.000 | 6.095 | EUR | 750 | 749 |
| 2011/2021 | Fixed | 4.000 | 4.123 | EUR | 500 | 517 |
| 2012/2022 | Fixed | 2.250 | 2.344 | EUR | 1,000 | 1,057 |
| 2013/2018 | Fixed | 2.750 | 2.855 | SEK | 1,150 | 117 |
| 2013/2018 | Floating | Stibor 3M+1.0 | SEK | 3,000 | 305 | |
| 2013/2023 | Floating | Stibor 3M+1.13 | SEK | 1,000 | 102 | |
| 2013/2043 | Fixed | 3.500 | 3.719 | EUR | 100 | 97 |
| Total outstanding carrying amount 31 December 2017 | 2,943 |
1) EMTN = Euro Medium Term Note
The tax currently payable is based on taxable profit for the year. Taxable profit differs from profit as reported in the consolidated income statement, because of items of income or expense that are taxable or deductible in other years and items that are never taxable or deductible. The Group's liability for current tax is calculated using tax rates that have been enacted or substantively enacted by the end of the reporting period.
Deferred tax is provided in full, using the liability method on temporary differences arising between the tax bases of assets and liabilities and their carrying amounts in the consolidated financial statements. However, if the deferred tax arises from initial recognition of an asset or liability in a transaction other than a business combination that at the time of the transaction affects neither accounting nor taxable profit or loss, it is not accounted for. Deferred tax is determined using tax rates (and laws) that have been enacted or substantially enacted by the closing date and are expected to apply when the related deferred tax asset is realised or the deferred tax liability is settled.
Deferred tax assets are recognised to the extent that it is probable that future taxable profit will be available against which the temporary differences can be utilised. Deferred tax assets are set off against deferred tax liabilities if they relate to income taxes levied by the same taxation authority.
Deferred tax is provided on temporary differences arising from investments in subsidiaries, associates and joint ventures, except where the timing of the reversal of the temporary difference is controlled by the Group, and it is probable that the temporary difference will not be reversed in the foreseeable future.
The Group recognises liabilities for anticipated tax dispute issues based on estimates of whether additional taxes will be due. No provision will be recognised in the financial statements if Fortum
considers the claims unjustifiable. Therefore, if taxes regarding ongoing tax disputes have to be paid before final court decisions, they will be booked as a receivable. Where the final outcome of these matters is different from the amounts that were initially recorded, such differences will impact the income tax and deferred tax provisions in the period in which such determination is made.
Fortum has deferred tax assets and liabilities which are expected to be realised through the income statement over the extended periods of time in the future. In calculating the deferred tax items, Fortum is required to make certain assumptions and estimates regarding the future tax consequences attributable to differences between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities as recorded in the financial statements and their tax basis.
Assumptions made include the expectation that future operating performance for subsidiaries will be consistent with historical levels of operating results, recoverability periods for tax loss carry-forwards will not change, and that existing tax laws and rates will remain unchanged into foreseeable future. Fortum believes that it has prudent assumptions in developing its deferred tax balances.
Assumptions and estimates regarding uncertain tax positions are supported by external legal counsel or expert opinion.
If the actual final outcome (regarding tax disputes) would differ negatively from management's estimates with 10%, the Group would need to increase the income tax liability by EUR 19 million as of 31 December 2017. For additional information regarding tax disputes, see Note 36 Legal actions and official proceedings.
| Operating and | Consolidated | Notes | Key figures | Parent company | Proposal for the use of the profit | Auditor's | Operational key figures | Investor |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| financial review | financial statements | 2008–2017 | financial statements | shown on the balance sheet | report | Quarterly financial information | information | |
| Basis of preparation | Risks | Income statement | Balance sheet | Off balance sheet items Group structure and related parties |
| 2017 | 2016 | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EUR million | 1 Jan Change | 31 Dec | 1 Jan Change | 31 Dec | ||
| BS Deferred tax assets | 66 | 7 | 73 | 80 | -14 | 66 |
| BS Deferred tax liabilities | -616 | -203 | -819 | -483 | -133 | -616 |
| Net deferred taxes | -550 | -197 | -747 | -404 | -146 | -550 |
Deferred income tax assets and liabilities are offset when there is a legally enforceable right to offset current tax assets against current tax liabilities and when the deferred income taxes relate to the same fiscal authority.
| Property, plant and | Pension | Derivative financial |
Tax losses and tax credits |
|||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EUR million | Intangible assets | equipment | obligations | Provisions | instruments | carry-forward | Other | Net deferred taxes |
| 1 Jan 2017 | -12 | -717 | 14 | 20 | 36 | 100 | 8 | -550 |
| Charged to income statement | 7 | -38 | 1 | -10 | 16 | 8 | -26 | -42 |
| Charged to other comprehensive income | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | -18 | 0 | 0 | -15 |
| Exchange rate differences, | ||||||||
| reclassifications and other changes | 2 | 29 | 1 | -2 | 1 | -2 | -6 | 22 |
| Acquisitions and disposals | -98 | -79 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 4 | -161 |
| 31 Dec 2017 | -101 | -806 | 21 | 7 | 35 | 116 | -20 | -747 |
Retained earnings when distributed as dividends are subject to withholding tax (Russia) or distribution tax (Estonia). Provision has been made for these taxes only to extent that it is expected that these earnings will be remitted in the foreseeable future. At the end of the year deferred income tax liabilities of EUR 28 million (2016: 19) have been recognised for the withholding tax and other taxes that would be payable on the distributions.
Deferred tax assets and liabilities from acquisitions and disposals in 2017 are mainly related to restructuring of the ownership in Hafslund together with the City of Oslo, acquisition of Solar power plants in Russia and wind power companies in Norway. In addition, the deferred tax asset relating to tax loss carry forwards increased net in 2017 mainly because of the additional taxable losses in the Netherlands partly offset by the usage of losses carry forwards in Russia.
| Property, plant and | Pension | Derivative financial |
Tax losses and tax credits |
|||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EUR million | Intangible assets | equipment | obligations | Provisions | instruments | carry-forward | Other | Net deferred taxes |
| 1 Jan 2016 | 0 | -551 | 11 | 14 | -42 | 146 | 18 | -404 |
| Charged to income statement | -9 | 2 | -3 | 27 | -49 | -11 | -42 | |
| Charged to other comprehensive income | 2 | 49 | 51 | |||||
| Exchange rate differences, | ||||||||
| reclassifications and other changes | -40 | 2 | 3 | -6 | -40 | |||
| Acquisitions and disposals | -12 | -118 | 9 | 6 | -115 | |||
| 31 Dec 2016 | -12 | -717 | 14 | 20 | 36 | 100 | 8 | -550 |
Deferred tax assets and liabilities from acquisitions and disposals in 2016 are mainly related to acquisition of Ekokem and Duon and disposal of Tobolsk. In addition, legal entities, primarily in Russia and Sweden used a portion of the deferred tax asset relating to tax loss carry forwards.
Key figures 2008–2017 Parent company
financial statements
Proposal for the use of the profit shown on the balance sheet
Auditor's report Operational key figures Quarterly financial information
Investor information
Operating and financial review Consolidated financial statements
Basis of preparation Risks Income statement Balance sheet Off balance sheet items Group structure and related parties
Deferred income tax assets are recognised for tax loss carry-forward to the extent that realisation of the related tax benefit through future profits is probable. The recognised tax assets relate to losses carryforward with no expiration date and partly with expiry date as described below.
Notes
| 2017 | 2016 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EUR million | Tax losses | Deferred tax asset |
Tax losses | Deferred tax asset |
|
| Losses without expiration date | 413 | 90 | 352 | 79 | |
| Losses with expiration date | 103 | 26 | 108 | 22 | |
| Total | 516 | 116 | 460 | 100 |
Deferred tax assets of EUR 20 million (2016: 56) have not been recognised in the consolidated financial statements, because the realisation is not probable. The major part of the unrecognised tax asset relates to loss carry-forwards that are unlikely to be used in the foreseeable future.
Tax loss carry-forwards increased in 2017 mainly because of the additional taxable losses in Netherlands and decreased mainly because of use of losses carry forwards in Russia.
| 2017 | 2016 | |
|---|---|---|
| Sweden | 28 | 124 |
| Belgium | 114 | 114 |
| Other | 30 | 52 |
| Total income tax receivables | 172 | 290 |
Income tax receivables reflect payments of corporate income tax done in relation to the year 2017 as well as payments according to received tax audit assessments in relation to previous years.
Fortum received in June 2017 an unfavourable decisions from the Administrative Court of Appeal in Sweden relating to the income tax assessments for 2009–2012 and has booked a tax cost of EUR 115 million and interest cost of EUR 7 million. Consequently, the income tax receivable decreased by the corresponding amount. Fortum has in previous years received income tax assessments in Sweden for the year 2013. The additional taxes for 2013 have been paid in July 2017, in total 273 MSEK (EUR 28 million) and based on supporting legal opinion booked as an income tax receivable.
In Belgium, Fortum has in previous years received income tax assessments for the years 2008–2012. The additional taxes have been paid during prior years, in total EUR 114 million and based on supporting legal opinions booked as an income tax receivable. Legal procedures in Finland concerning 2007–2011 transfer pricing audit have been closed to Fortum's benefit.
See Note 36 Legal actions and official proceedings.
Fortum owns Loviisa nuclear power plant in Finland. In Fortum's consolidated balance sheet, Share in the State Nuclear Waste Management Fund and the Nuclear provisions relate to Loviisa nuclear power plant. Fortum's nuclear related provisions and the related part of the State Nuclear Waste Management Fund are both presented separately in the balance sheet. Fortum's share in the State Nuclear Waste Management Fund is accounted for according to IFRIC 5, Rights to interests arising from decommissioning, restoration and environmental rehabilitation funds which states that the fund assets are measured at the lower of fair value or the value of the related liabilities since Fortum does not have control or joint control over the State Nuclear Waste Management Fund. The Nuclear Waste Management Fund is managed by governmental authorities. The related provisions are the provision for decommissioning and the provision for disposal of spent fuel.
The fair values of the provisions are calculated according to IAS 37 by discounting the separate future cash flows, which are based on estimated future costs and actions already taken. The initial net present value of the provision for decommissioning (at the time of commissioning the nuclear power plant) has been included in the investment cost and is depreciated over the estimated operating time of the nuclear power plant. Changes in the technical plans etc., which have an impact on the future cash flow of the estimated costs for decommissioning, are accounted for by discounting the additional costs to the current point in time. The increased asset retirement cost due to the increased provision is added to property, plant and equipment and depreciated over the remaining estimated operating time of the nuclear power plant. For power plant units taken from use the increase is taken to income statement.
The provision for spent fuel covers the future disposal costs for fuel used until the end of the accounting period. Costs for disposal of spent fuel are expensed during the operating time based on fuel usage. The impact of the possible changes in the estimated future cash flow for related costs is recognised immediately in the income statement based on the accumulated amount of fuel used until the end of the accounting period. The related interest costs due to unwinding of the provision is recognised in the corresponding period.
The timing factor is taken into account by recognising the interest expense related to discounting the nuclear provisions. The interest on the State Nuclear Waste Management Fund assets is presented as financial income.
Fortum's actual share of the State Nuclear Waste Management Fund, related to Loviisa nuclear power plant, is higher than the carrying value of the Fund in the balance sheet. The legal nuclear liability should, according to the Finnish Nuclear Energy Act, be fully covered by payments and guarantees to the State Nuclear Waste Management Fund. The legal liability is not discounted while the provisions are, and since
| Operating and financial review |
Consolidated | financial statements | Notes | Key figures 2008–2017 |
Parent company financial statements |
Proposal for the use of the profit shown on the balance sheet |
Auditor's report |
Operational key figures Quarterly financial information |
Investor information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Basis of preparation | Risks | Income statement | Balance sheet | Off balance sheet items Group structure and related parties |
the future cash flow is spread over 100 years, the difference between the legal liability and the provisions are material.
The annual fee to the Fund is based on changes in the legal liability, the interest income generated in the State Nuclear Waste Management Fund and incurred costs of taken actions.
Fortum also has minority interests in nuclear power companies, i.e. Teollisuuden Voima Oyj (TVO) in Finland and OKG Aktiebolag (OKG) and Forsmarks Kraftgrupp AB (Forsmark) in Sweden. The minority shareholdings are classified as associated companies and joint ventures and are consolidated with equity method. Both the Finnish and the Swedish companies are non-profit making, i.e. electricity production is invoiced to the owners at cost including depreciations, interest costs and production taxes accounted for according to local GAAP. Accounting policies of the associates regarding nuclear assets and liabilities have been changed where necessary to ensure consistency with the policies adopted by the Group.
The provision for future obligations for nuclear waste management including decommissioning of Fortum's nuclear power plant and related spent fuel is based on long-term cash flow forecasts of estimated future costs. The main assumptions are technical plans, timing, cost estimates and discount rate. The technical plans, timing and cost estimates are approved by governmental authorities.
Any changes in the assumed discount rate would affect the provision. If the discount rate used would be lowered, the provision would increase. Fortum has contributed cash to the State Nuclear Waste Management Fund based on a non-discounted legal liability, which leads to that the increase in provision would be offset by an increase in the recorded share of Fortum's part of the State Nuclear Waste Management Fund in the balance sheet. The total effect on the income statement would be positive since the decommissioning part of the provision is treated as an asset retirement obligation. This situation will prevail as long as the legal obligation to contribute cash to the State Nuclear Waste Management Fund is based on a non-discounted liability and IFRS is limiting the carrying value of the assets to the amount of the provision since Fortum does not have control or joint control over the fund.
Based on the Nuclear Energy Act in Finland, Fortum has a legal obligation to fully fund the legal liability decided by the governmental authorities, for decommissioning of the power plant and disposal of spent fuel through the State Nuclear Waste Management Fund.
Both in Finland and in Sweden nuclear operators are legally obligated for the decommissioning of the plants and the disposal of spent fuel (nuclear waste management). In both countries the nuclear operators are obligated to secure the funding of nuclear waste management by paying to government operated nuclear waste funds. The nuclear operators also have to give securities to guarantee that sufficient funds exist to cover future expenses of decommissioning of the power plant and disposal of spent fuel.
| EUR million | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|
| Carrying values in the balance sheet | ||
| BS Nuclear provisions | 858 | 830 |
| BS Fortum's share of the State Nuclear Waste Management Fund | 858 | 830 |
| Legal liability and actual share of the State Nuclear Waste Management Fund | ||
| Liability for nuclear waste management according to the Nuclear Energy Act | 1,161 | 1,141 |
| Funding obligation target | 1,153 | 1,125 |
| Fortum's share of the State Nuclear Waste Management Fund | 1,125 | 1,094 |
| Share of the fund not recognised in the balance sheet | 267 | 264 |
The legal liability on 31 December 2017, decided by the Ministry of Economic Affairs and Employment in December 2017, was EUR 1,161 million.
The legal liability is based on a cost estimate, which is done every year, and a technical plan, which is made every third year. The current technical plan was updated in 2016. Following the update of the technical plan in 2016, the liability increased due to updated cost estimates related to interim and final storage of spent fuel. The legal liability is determined by assuming that the decommissioning would start at the beginning of the year following the assessment year.
According to Nuclear Energy Act, Fortum is obligated to contribute funds in full to the State Nuclear Waste Management Fund to cover the legal liability. Fortum contributes funds to the Finnish State Nuclear Waste Management Fund based on the yearly funding obligation target decided by the governmental authorities in December in connection with the decision of size of the legal liability. The current funding obligation target decided in December 2017 is EUR 1,153 million.
| EUR million | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|
| BS 1 January | 830 | 810 |
| Additional provisions | 4 | 6 |
| Used during the year | -21 | -20 |
| Unwinding of discount | 45 | 34 |
| BS 31 December | 858 | 830 |
| Fortum's share in the State Nuclear Waste Management Fund | 858 | 830 |
Nuclear provisions include the provision for decommissioning and the provision for disposal of spent fuel. The carrying value of the nuclear provisions, calculated according to IAS 37, increased by EUR 28 million compared to 31 December 2016, totalling EUR 858 million on 31 December 2017. The provisions are based on the same cash flows for future costs as the legal liability, but the legal liability is not discounted to net present value.
The carrying value of the Fund in the balance sheet cannot exceed the carrying value of the nuclear provisions according to IFRIC Interpretation 5. The Fund is from an IFRS perspective overfunded with EUR 267 million, since Fortum's share of the Fund on 31 December 2017 was EUR 1,125 million and the carrying value in the balance sheet was EUR 858 million.
Fortum's share of the Finnish Nuclear Waste Management Fund in Fortum's balance sheet can in maximum be equal to the amount of the provisions according to IFRS. As long as the Fund is overfunded from an IFRS perspective, the effects to operating profit from this adjustment will be positive if the provisions increase more than the Fund and negative if actual value of the fund increases more than the provisions. This accounting effect is not included in Comparable operating profit in Fortum financial reporting. For more information see Note 6 Items affecting comparability.
Participants in the Finnish State Nuclear Waste Management Fund are allowed to borrow from the fund according to certain rules. Fortum uses the right to borrow back and has pledged shares in Kemijoki Oy as security for the loans. The loans are renewed yearly. See Note 26 Interest-bearing liabilities and Note 35 Pledged assets and contingent liabilities.
OKG, Forsmark and TVO are non-profit making companies, i.e. electricity production is invoiced to the owners at cost including depreciations, interest costs and production taxes. Invoiced cost is accounted for according to local GAAP. In addition to the invoiced electricity production cost, Fortum makes IFRS adjustments to comply with Fortum's accounting principles. These adjustments include also Fortum's share of the companies' nuclear waste funds and nuclear provisions.
The tables below present the 100% figures relating to nuclear funds and provisions for the companies as well as Fortum's net share.
| 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|
| 953 | 955 |
| 953 | 955 |
| 0 | 0 |
| 1,482 | 1,450 |
| 1,437 | 1,380 |
| 484 | 425 |
TVO's legal liability and contribution to the fund are based on same principles as described above for Loviisa nuclear power plant.
TVO's share of the Finnish State Nuclear Waste Management Fund is from an IFRS perspective overfunded with EUR 484 million (of which Fortum's share EUR 129 million), since TVO's share of the Fund on 31 December 2017 was EUR 1,437 million and the carrying value in the balance sheet was EUR 953 million.
Participants in the Finnish State Nuclear Waste Management Fund are allowed to borrow from the fund according to certain rules. Fortum is using the right to reborrow funds through TVO based on its ownership. See more information in Note 26 Interest-bearing liabilities.
| EUR million | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|
| OKG's and Forsmark's nuclear related assets and liabilities 1) | ||
| Nuclear provisions | 3,398 | 3,297 |
| Share in the State Nuclear Waste Management Fund | 3,105 | 3,068 |
| Net amount | -293 | -229 |
| of which Fortum's net share consolidated with equity method | -114 | -106 |
1) Accounted for according to Fortum's accounting principles. Companies' statutory financial statements are not prepared according to IFRS.
In Sweden Svensk Kärnbränslehantering AB (SKB), a company owned by the nuclear operators, takes care of all nuclear waste management related activities on behalf of nuclear operators. SKB receives its funding from the Swedish State Nuclear Waste Management Fund, which in turn is financed by the nuclear operators.
In addition to nuclear waste fees nuclear power companies provide guarantees for any uncovered liability and unexpected events.
For more information regarding Fortum's guarantees given on behalf of nuclear associated companies, see Note 35 Pledged assets and contingent liabilities.
Nuclear waste fees and guarantees are updated every third year by governmental decision after a proposal from Swedish Radiation Safety Authority (SSM). The proposal is based on cost estimates done by SKB. Currently the fees and guarantees are decided for years 2015–2017. A new technical plan for nuclear waste management has been decided by SKB during 2016. During 2017 SKB has submitted the cost estimates based on the revised technical plan to SSM, after which the Swedish government has decided the waste fees and guarantees for years 2018–2020. Nuclear waste fees are currently based on future costs with the assumed lifetime of 50 years (40 years in previous decision) for each unit of a nuclear power plant.
Provisions for environmental obligations, asset retirement obligations, restructuring costs and legal claims are recognised when the Group has a present legal or constructive obligation as a result of past events to a third party, it is probable that an outflow of resources will be required to settle the obligation and the amount can be reliably estimated.
Provisions are measured at the present value of the expenditures expected to be required to settle the obligation using a pre-tax rate that reflects current market assessments of the time value of money and the risks specific to the obligation. The increase in the provision due to the passage of time is recognised as interest expense.
Environmental provisions are recognised, based on current interpretation of environmental laws and regulations, when it is probable that a present obligation has arisen and the amount of such liability can be reliably estimated. Environmental expenditures resulting from the remediation of an existing condition caused by past operations, and which do contribute to current or future revenues, are expensed as incurred.
Environmental provisions include provisions for obligations to cover landfills and clean-up obligations for contaminated land areas. Provisions are determined based on the surface area of the landfill site, remaining land area to be landscaped or otherwise cleaned-up, and the unit cost of conducting the coverage and clean-up activities in the future.
Environmental provisions are also booked for aftercare and monitoring obligations arising from landfill permit holder's requirement to take into account potential danger to health or the environment posed by a landfill site for a period of at least 30 (up to 60) years after the coverage. The aftercare and monitoring provision is determined on the basis of estimated costs and estimated number of years of filling the landfill.
Asset retirement obligation is recognised either when there is a contractual obligation towards a third party or a legal obligation and the obligation amount can be estimated reliably. Obligating event is e.g. when a plant is built on a leased land with an obligation to dismantle and remove the asset in the future or when a legal obligation towards Fortum changes. The asset retirement obligation is recognised as part of the cost of an item of property, plant and equipment when the asset is put in service. The costs will be depreciated over the remainder of the asset's useful life.
Investor information
A restructuring provision is recognised when the Group has developed a detailed formal plan for the restructuring and has raised a valid expectation in those affected that it will carry out the restructuring by starting to implement the plan or announcing its main features to those affected by it. The measurement of a restructuring provision includes only the direct expenditures arising from the restructuring, which are those amounts that are both necessarily entailed by the restructuring and not associated with the ongoing activities of the entity. Restructuring provisions comprise mainly employee termination payments and lease termination costs.
Provisions for present obligations require management to assess the best estimate of the expenditure needed to settle the present obligation at the end of the reporting period. The actual amount and timing of the expenditure might differ from estimates made.
| 2017 | 2016 | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EUR million | Environ mental |
Other | Total | Environ mental |
Other | Total | |
| 1 January | 47 | 82 | 129 | 2 | 96 | 98 | |
| Acquisitions | 0 | 7 | 7 | 44 | 4 | 48 | |
| Provisions for the period | 0 | 31 | 31 | 1 | 14 | 15 | |
| Provisions used | 0 | -35 | -35 | 0 | -25 | -25 | |
| Provisions reversed | 0 | -10 | -10 | 0 | -9 | -9 | |
| Exchange rate difference and other charges |
-4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | |
| 31 December | 43 | 79 | 122 | 47 | 82 | 129 | |
| Of which current provisions 1) | 0 | 22 | 22 | 1 | 11 | 13 | |
| BS Of which non-current provisions | 43 | 57 | 100 | 46 | 70 | 116 |
1) Included in trade and other payables in the balance sheet, see Note 32 Trade and other payables.
Environmental provisions include mainly provisions for obligations to cover and monitor landfills as well as to clean contaminated land areas. Main part of the provisions are estimated to be used within 10–15 years. The increase in environmental provisions in 2016 is mainly arising from the acquisition of Ekokem (see Note 38 Acquisitions and disposals).
Dismantling provision for the Finnish coal fired power plant Inkoo is included in Other provisions. Regarding provisions for decommissioning and provision for disposal of spent fuel for nuclear production, see Note 28 Nuclear related assets and liabilities.
39 40
Parent company financial statements Proposal for the use of the profit shown on the balance sheet
Auditor's report
Operational key figures Quarterly financial information
Basis of preparation Risks Income statement Balance sheet Off balance sheet items Group structure and related parties
The Group companies have various pension schemes in accordance with the local conditions and practises in the countries in which they operate. The schemes are generally funded through payments to insurance companies or the Group's pension funds as determined by periodic actuarial calculations. The Group has both defined benefit and defined contribution plans.
The Group's contributions to defined contribution plans are charged to the income statement in the period to which the contributions relate.
For defined benefit plans, pension costs are assessed using the projected unit credit method. The cost of providing pensions is charged to the income statement as to spread the service cost over the service lives of employees. The net interest is presented in financial items and the rest of the income statement effect as pension cost.
The defined benefit obligation is calculated annually on the balance sheet date and is measured as the present value of the estimated future cash flows using interest rates of high-quality corporate bonds that have terms to maturity approximating to the terms of the related pension liability. In countries where there is no deep market in such bonds, market yields on government bonds are used instead. The plan assets for pensions are valued at market value. The liability recognised in the balance sheet is the defined benefit obligation at the closing date less the fair value of plan assets. Prepaid contributions are recognised as an asset to the extent that a cash refund or a reduction in the future payments is available.
When the benefits of a plan are changed or when a plan is curtailed, the resulting change in benefit that relates to past service or the gain or loss related to a curtailment is recognised immediately in profit or loss. Gains or losses on settlements of defined benefits plans are recognised when the settlement occurs.
The present value of the pension obligations is based on actuarial calculations that use several assumptions. Any changes in these assumptions will impact the carrying amount of pension obligations.
In Finland statutory pension benefits (as determined in Employee's Pension Act /TyEL) provide the employees pension coverage for old age, disability and death of a family provider. The benefits are insured with an insurance company and determined to be defined contribution plans.
In addition the Group has additional old-age and survivors pension benefits arranged with the Fortum Pension Fund. The Fortum Pension Fund is a closed fund managed by a Board, consisting of both employers' and employees' representatives. The Fund is operating under regulation from Financial Supervisory Authority (FSA). The liability has to be fully covered according to the regulations. The national benefit obligation related to the defined benefit plans is calculated so that the promised benefit is fully funded until retirement. After retirement the benefits payable are indexed yearly with TyEL-index. The promised benefit is defined in the rules of the Fund, mostly 66% at a maximum of the salary basis. The salary basis is an average of the ten last years' salaries, which are indexed with a common salary index to the accounting year.
In Sweden the Group operates several defined benefit and defined contribution plans like the general ITP-pension plan and the PA-KL and PA-KFS plans that are eligible for employees within companies formerly owned by municipalities. The defined benefit plans are fully funded and have partly been financed through Fortum's own pension fund and partly through insurance premiums. The pension arrangements comprise normal retirement pension, complementary retirement pensions, survivors' pension and disability pension. The most significant pension plan is the ITP-plan for white-collar employees in permanent employment (or temporary employees after a certain waiting period), who fulfil the age conditions. To qualify for a full pension the employee must have a projected period of pensionable service, from the date of entry until retirement age, of at least 30 years.
The Swedish pension fund is managed by a Board, consisting of both employers' and employees' representatives. The fund is operating under regulation from Swedish Financial Supervisory Authority and the County Administrative Board and governed by Swedish law (no. 1967:531). The fund constitutes a security for the employers' defined benefit pension plan liability and the fund has no obligations in relation to pension payments. The employer must have a credit insurance from PRI Pensionsgaranti Mutual Insurance Company for the liability. The liability does not have to be fully covered by the fund according to the regulations.
The part of the ITP multiemployer pension plan that is secured by paying pension premiums to Alecta, in Fortum's case the collective family pension, is accounted for as a defined contribution plan due to that there is no consistent and reliable basis to allocate assets or liabilities to the participating entities within the ITP insurance. The reason for this is that it is not possible to determine from the terms of the plan to which extent a surplus or a deficit will affect future contributions.
Group companies operate both defined contribution and defined benefit plans. Some defined benefit schemes offer benefits common for municipalities in Norway and some are private pension schemes. Benefits include old age pensions, disability pension and survivor's pension, including pension benefits from the National Insurance Scheme (Folketrygden). The schemes are fully funded within the rules set out in the Norwegian insurance legislation.
The majority of the defined benefit plans are closed, either private plans or public plans, that are operated by the Hafslund and Infratek,s Pension Fund. The Group has also a closed public defined benefit plan operated by Oslo Pensjonsforsikring AS. In addition, the Group has defined benefit plans with various insurance companies.
Pension arrangements in Russia include payments made to the state pension fund. These arrangements are treated as defined contribution plans. The Russian (in addition to the defined contribution plans) and Polish companies participate in certain defined benefit plans, defined by collective agreements, which are unfunded and where the company meets the benefit payment obligation as it falls due. The benefits provided under these arrangements include, in addition to pension payments, one-time benefits paid in case of employee mortality or disability as well as lump sum payments for anniversary and financial support to honoured workers and pensioners.
In other countries the pension arrangements are done in accordance with the local legislation and practice, mostly being defined contribution plans.
Finland – If the return of the fund's assets is not enough to cover the raise in liability and benefit payments over the financial year then the employer funds the deficit with contributions unless the fund has sufficient equity.
Sweden – As the pension fund is separated from the funding companies Fortum is not obliged to make additional contributions to the pension fund in any case of deficit. However if the assets decrease to a level lower than the liability according to Swedish GAAP, Fortum's credit insurance cost from PRI will increase.
Finland – The discount rate which is used to calculate the defined benefit obligation (according to IFRS) depends on the value of corporate bond yields as at reporting date. A decrease in yields increases the benefit obligation that is offset by increase in the value of fixed income holdings.
Finland – The pension fund's board accepts yearly an Investment Plan, which is based on an external asset-liability analysis. The assets are allocated to stocks and stock funds, fixed income instruments and real estate. The investments are diversified into different asset classes and to different asset managers taking into account the regulation of the Financial Supervisory Authority. The real estate investments consist mainly of the Fortum headquarters, rented by Fortum Corporation.
Sweden – The pension fund operation is regulated by law and supervised by central administrative authorities (Finansinspektionen and the County Administrative Board). The pension fund board decides yearly on a policy for asset allocation and a risk management model that stipulates a maximum acceptable market value decrease of the assets. The major assets are fixed income instruments, stock index funds and cash.
Actuarial calculations use assumptions for future inflation and salary levels and longevity. Should the actual outcome differ from these assumptions, this might lead to higher liability.
| obligation | Defined benefit | assets | Fair value of plan | Net defined benefit asset(-)/ liability(+) |
|||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EUR million | 2017 | 2016 | 2017 | 2016 | 2017 | 2016 | |
| Balance at 1 January | 452 | 448 | -378 | -384 | 74 | 64 | |
| Included in profit or loss | |||||||
| Current service cost | 6 | 8 | 7 | 9 | |||
| Past service cost 1) | 0 | -4 | 0 | -4 | |||
| Settlements | -3 | -6 | 5 | 5 | 2 | -1 | |
| Net interest 2) | 9 | 11 | -7 | -9 | 2 | 2 | |
| 12 | 9 | -2 | -3 | 10 | 6 | ||
| Included in OCI | |||||||
| Remeasurement gains(-)/losses(+) | 10 | 15 | 7 | -5 | 17 | 10 | |
| Actuarial gains/losses arising from changes in financial assumptions |
16 | 28 | 16 | 28 | |||
| Actuarial gains/losses arising from experience adjustments |
-6 | -12 | -6 | -12 | |||
| Return on plan assets (excluding amounts included in net interest expense) |
7 | -5 | 7 | -5 | |||
| Exchange rate differences | -5 | -4 | 4 | 4 | -1 | 0 | |
| 5 | 11 | 11 | -1 | 16 | 10 | ||
| Other | |||||||
| Contributions paid by the employer | -3 | -1 | -3 | -1 | |||
| Benefits paid | -18 | -16 | 14 | 12 | -3 | -4 | |
| Acquisitions of subsidiary companies | 50 | 0 | -43 | 0 | 7 | 0 | |
| Balance at 31 December | 501 | 452 | -401 | -378 | 101 | 74 | |
| Present value of funded defined obligation | 497 | 447 | |||||
| Fair value of plan assets | -401 | -378 | |||||
| Funded status | 96 | 70 | |||||
| Present value of unfunded obligation 3) | 4 | 5 | |||||
| Net liability arising from defined benefit obligation |
101 | 74 | |||||
| Pension assets included in other non-current assets in the balance sheet |
2 | 1 | |||||
| BS Pension obligations in the balance sheet | 102 | 76 |
1) In 2016 including EUR -6 million from the pension reform in Finland.
2) Net interest is presented among financial items in income statement, the rest of costs related to defined benefit plans are included in staff costs (row defined benefits plans in the staff cost specification in Note 10 Employee benefits).
3) The unfunded obligation relates to arrangements in Russia and Poland.
At the end of 2017 a total of 985 (2016: 864) Fortum employees are included in defined benefit plans providing pension benefits. During 2017 pensions or related benefits were paid to a total of 3,160 (2016: 2,865) persons.
Contributions expected to be paid during year 2018 are EUR 4 million.
| EUR million | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|
| Equity instruments | 126 | 120 |
| Debt instruments | 156 | 140 |
| Cash and cash equivalents | 48 | 26 |
| Real estate, of which EUR 42 million (2016: 66) occupied by the Group | 47 | 69 |
| Investment funds | 1 | - |
| Company's own ordinary shares | 5 | 4 |
| Other assets | 18 | 19 |
| Total | 401 | 378 |
When the pension plan has been financed through an insurance company, a specification of the plan assets has not been available. In these cases the fair value of plan assets has been included in other assets.
The actual return on plan assets in Finland, Sweden and Norway totalled EUR 0 million (2016: 14).
| EUR million | Finland | Sweden Norway | Other countries |
Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Present value of funded obligations | 295 | 141 | 61 | 0 | 497 |
| Fair value of plan assets | -245 | -105 | -51 | 0 | -401 |
| Deficit(+)/surplus(-) | 50 | 36 | 10 | 0 | 96 |
| Present value of unfunded obligations | 4 | 4 | |||
| Net asset(-)/liability(+) in the balance sheet | 50 | 36 | 10 | 4 | 101 |
| Pension asset included in non-current assets | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| BS Pension obligations in the balance sheet | 50 | 37 | 11 | 4 | 102 |
| Operating and financial review |
Consolidated | financial statements | Notes | Key figures 2008–2017 |
Parent company financial statements |
Proposal for the use of the profit shown on the balance sheet |
Auditor's report |
Operational key figures Quarterly financial information |
Investor information |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Basis of preparation Risks |
Income statement | Balance sheet | Off balance sheet items | Group structure and related parties |
| Other | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EUR million | Finland | Sweden | Norway | countries | Total |
| Present value of funded obligations | 308 | 130 | 9 | 0 | 447 |
| Fair value of plan assets | -262 | -110 | -6 | 0 | -378 |
| Deficit(+)/surplus(-) | 46 | 20 | 3 | 0 | 70 |
| Present value of unfunded obligations | 5 | 5 | |||
| Net asset(-)/liability(+) in the balance sheet | 46 | 20 | 3 | 5 | 74 |
| Pension asset included in non-current assets | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| BS Pension obligations in the balance sheet | 46 | 21 | 4 | 5 | 76 |
| 2017 | 2016 | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| % | Finland | Sweden | Norway | Finland | Sweden | Norway |
| Discount rate | 1.50 | 2.40 | 2.30 | 1.50 | 2.80 | 2.10 |
| Future salary increases | 2.90 | 2.80 | 2.50 | 1.90 | 3.00 | 2.25 |
| Future pension increases | 2.00 | 2.80 | 1.34 | 2.00 | 1.70 | 1.27 |
| Rate of inflation | 1.70 | 1.80 | 1.50 | 1.70 | 1.70 | 1.75 |
The discount rate in Finland is based on high quality European corporate bonds with maturity that best reflects the estimated term of the defined benefit pension plans. The discount rate in Sweden is based on yields on Swedish covered bonds with maturity that best reflects the estimated term of the defined benefit pension plans. The covered bonds in Sweden are considered high quality bonds as they are secured with assets.
| Longevity at age 65 | Finland | Sweden | Norway |
|---|---|---|---|
| 45– male | 22 | 23 | 23 |
| 45– female | 27 | 25 | 26 |
| 65– male | 21 | 22 | 22 |
| 65– female | 25 | 24 | 25 |
The discount, inflation and salary growth rates used are the key assumptions used when calculating defined benefit obligations. Effects of 0.5 percentage point change in the rates to the defined benefit obligation on 31 December 2017, holding all other assumptions stable, are presented in the table below.
| Impact to the pension obligation increase(+)/ decrease(-) |
|||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Change in the assumption | Finland | Sweden | Norway | ||
| 0.5% increase in discount rate | -7% | -10% | -6% | ||
| 0.5% decrease in discount rate | 8% | 12% | 7% | ||
| 0.5% increase in benefit | 1% | 10% | 5% | ||
| 0.5% decrease in benefit | -1% | -9% | -6% | ||
| 0.5% increase in salary growth rate | 6% | 2% | 3% | ||
| 0.5% decrease in salary growth rate | -6% | -3% | -3% |
The methods used in preparing the sensitivity analysis did not change compared to the previous period. Change in mortality basis so that life expectancy increases by one year would increase the net liability in Finland, Sweden and Norway with EUR 17 million (19%).
| EUR million | Future benefit payments |
|---|---|
| Maturity under 1 year | 17 |
| Maturity between 1 and 5 years | 73 |
| Maturity between 5 and 10 years | 90 |
| Maturity between 10 and 20 years | 171 |
| Maturity between 20 and 30 years | 133 |
| Maturity over 30 years | 98 |
The weighted average duration of defined benefit obligation in Finland, Sweden and Norway at the end of year 2017 is 17 years.
| EUR million | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|
| Connection fees | 109 | 109 |
| Other liabilities | 66 | 70 |
| BS Total | 175 | 179 |
Connection fees are refundable connection fees to the district heating network in Finland.
| EUR million | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|
| Trade payables | 318 | 323 |
| Accrued expenses and deferred income | ||
| Accrued personnel expenses | 97 | 61 |
| Accrued interest expenses | 113 | 132 |
| Other accrued expenses and deferred income | 174 | 130 |
| Other liabilities | ||
| VAT-liability | 43 | 43 |
| Current tax liability | 25 | 20 |
| Energy taxes | 15 | 14 |
| Advances received | 98 | 19 |
| Current provisions 1) | 22 | 13 |
| Other liabilities | 209 | 86 |
| BS Total | 1,112 | 841 |
1) See also Note 29 Other provisions.
The management considers that the amount of trade and other payables approximates fair value.
Leases of property, plant and equipment, where the Group does not have substantially all of the risks and rewards of ownership are classified as operating leases. Payments made under operating leases are recognised in the income statement as costs on a straight-line basis over the lease term.
Payments received under operating leases where the Group leases out fixed assets are recognised as other income in the income statement.
Leases of property, plant and equipment, where the Group has substantially all the risks and rewards of ownership, are classified as finance leases. Finance leases are capitalised at the commencement of the lease term at the lower of the fair value of the leased property and the present value of the minimum lease payments determined at the inception of the lease.
The operating rental income recognised in income statement was EUR 6 million (2016: 5).
Finance leases relate to heat pipelines in Tyumen area, which are leased to newly established joint venture YUSTEK. See additional information in Note 38 Acquisitions and disposals.
| 2017 | 2016 | 2017 | 2016 | 2017 | 2016 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EUR million | Gross investment in finance lease arrangements |
Unearned interest income | Present value of minimum lease payments |
|||
| Due within 1 year | 1 | - | 4 | - | -3 | - |
| Due in 1 to 5 years | 21 | - | 21 | - | 0 | - |
| Due in more than 5 years |
167 | - | 123 | - | 44 | - |
| Total | 189 | - | 148 | - | 41 | - |
The present value of minimum lease payments is included in interest-bearing receivables in the balance sheet, see Note 20 Interest-bearing receivables.
Fortum leases mainly land and office buildings under various non-cancellable operating leases, some of which contain renewal options. The future costs for non-cancellable operating lease contracts are stated below. Lease rental expenses amounting to EUR 33 million (2016: 15) are included in the income statement in other expenses.
| EUR million | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|
| Not later than 1 year | 23 | 16 |
| Later than 1 year and not later than 5 years | 72 | 31 |
| Later than 5 years | 65 | 27 |
| Total | 160 | 74 |
Increase in operating lease commitments arises mainly from the lease agreement relating to the new head office in Espoo.
Fortum does not have material finance lease arrangements where the Group is acting as a lessee.
| EUR million | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|
| Property, plant and equipment | 362 | 467 |
Capital commitments are capital expenditures contracted for at the balance sheet date but not recognised in the financial statements. The decrease in capital commitments compared to previous year comes mainly from progressing of the automation investment in Loviisa nuclear power plant and India solar investments, partly offset by increased wind power investments in Norway.
For more information regarding capital expenditure, see Note 17 Property, plant and equipment.
On 26 September 2017, Fortum announced it had signed a transaction agreement with E.ON under which E.ON has the right to tender its 46.65% shareholding in Uniper in early 2018. In November 2017 Fortum launched a voluntary public takeover offer to all Uniper shareholders at a total value of EUR 22 per share (in total approximately EUR 8 billion).
On 19 January 2018, Fortum announced that the number of shares tendered during the initial acceptance period of Fortum's voluntary public takeover offer for the outstanding shares of Uniper totalled 171,736,647 shares. This corresponds to approximately 46.93% of the share capital and the voting rights of Uniper. The initial acceptance period ended on 16 January 2018 and the additional acceptance period resumed on 20 January 2018 and will end on 2 February 2018. The value of the tendered shares from the initial acceptance period is EUR 3.78 billion based on the total value of EUR 22 per share.
Fortum has committed to provide a maximum of EUR 93 million (Dec 31 2016: 100) to Voimaosakeyhtiö SF, for its participation in the Fennovoima nuclear power project in Finland. Furthermore, Fortum's remaining direct commitment regarding the construction of a waste-to-energy combined heat and power plant (CHP) in Kaunas, Lithuania is EUR 15 million at maximum at the end of 2017. The investment is made through Kauno Kogeneracinė Jėgainė (KKJ), a joint venture owned together with Lietuvos Energija.
For information regarding shareholder loan commitments related to associated companies and joint ventures, see Note 20 Interest bearing receivables.
A contingent liability is disclosed when there is a possible obligation that arises from past events and whose existence is only confirmed by one or more doubtful future events or when there is an obligation that is not recognised as a liability or provision because it is not probable that an outflow of resources will be required or the amount of the obligation cannot be reliably estimated.
| Operating and | Consolidated | Notes | Key figures | Parent company | Proposal for the use of the profit | Auditor's | Operational key figures | Investor | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| financial review | financial statements | 2008–2017 | financial statements | shown on the balance sheet | report | Quarterly financial information | information | |||
| Basis of preparation Risks Income statement Balance sheet Off balance sheet items Group structure and related parties |
| EUR million | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|
| Pledged assets on own behalf | ||
| For debt | ||
| Pledges | 300 | 291 |
| Real estate mortages | 177 | 137 |
| For other commitments | ||
| Pledges | 346 | 379 |
| Real estate mortages | 141 | 99 |
| Contingent liabilities on own behalf | ||
| Other contingent liabilities | 161 | 205 |
| On behalf of associated companies and joint ventures | ||
| Guarantees | 598 | 603 |
Finnish participants in the State Nuclear Waste Management Fund are allowed to borrow from the fund. Fortum has pledged shares in Kemijoki Oy as a security. The value of the pledged shares was EUR 269 million on 31 December 2017 (2016: 269).
Fortum Tartu in Estonia (60% owned by Fortum) has given real estate mortgages for a value of EUR 96 million (2016: 96) as a security for an external loan. Real estate mortgages have also been given for loan from Fortum's pension fund for EUR 41 million (2016: 41).
Property of the Russian solar plants of EUR 41 million was mortgaged for loans (2016: 0). Regarding the relevant interest-bearing liabilities, see Note 26 Interest-bearing liabilities.
Pledges also include restricted cash given as trading collateral of EUR 346 million (2016: 345) for trading of electricity and CO2 emission allowances in Nasdaq Commodities Europe, in Intercontinental Exchange (ICE), European Energy Exchange (EEX) and Polish Power Exchange (TGE). See also Note 20 Interest-bearing receivables.
Fortum has given real estate mortgages in power plants in Finland, total value of EUR 141 million in December 2017 (2016: 99), as a security to the Finnish State Nuclear Waste Management Fund for the uncovered part of the legal liability and unexpected events relating to future costs for decommissioning and disposal of spent fuel in Loviisa nuclear power plant. According to the Nuclear Energy Act, Fortum is obligated to contribute the funds in full to the State Nuclear Waste Management Fund to cover the legal liability. Any uncovered legal liability relates to periodising of the payments to the fund. The size of the securities given is updated yearly in Q2 based on the decisions regarding the legal liabilities and the funding target which take place around year-end every year. Due to the yearly update, the amount of real estate mortgages given as a security increased by EUR 42 million.
See also Note 28 Nuclear related assets and liabilities.
Fortum owns the coal condensing power plant Meri-Pori in Finland. Teollisuuden Voima Oyj (TVO) has the contractual right to participate in the plant with 45.45%. Based on the participation agreement Fortum has to give a guarantee to TVO against breach in contract. The amount of the guarantee is set to EUR 125 million (2016: 125).
Guarantees and other contingent liabilities on behalf of associated companies and joint ventures mainly consist of guarantees relating to Fortum's associated nuclear companies Teollisuuden Voima Oyj (TVO), Forsmarks Kraftgrupp AB (FKA) and OKG AB (OKG). The guarantees are given in proportion to Fortum's respective ownership in each of these companies.
According to law, nuclear companies operating in Finland and Sweden shall give securities to the Finnish State Nuclear Waste Management Fund and the Swedish Nuclear Waste Fund respectively, to guarantee that sufficient funds exist to cover future expenses of decommissioning of the power plant and disposal of spent fuel. In Finland, Fortum has given a guarantee on behalf of TVO to the Finnish State Nuclear Waste Management Fund to cover Fortum's part of TVO's uncovered part of the legal liability and for unexpected events. The amount of guarantees is updated every year in June based on the legal liability decided in December the previous year. Due to the yearly update, the amount of guarantees given were EUR 50 million (2016: 38). The guarantee covers the unpaid legal liability due to periodisation as well as risks for unexpected future costs.
In Sweden, Fortum has given guarantees on behalf of FKA and OKG to the Swedish Nuclear Waste Fund to cover Fortum's part of FKA's and OKG's liability. Guarantees for the period of 2015–2017 has been given on behalf of Forsmarks Kraftgrupp AB and OKG AB amounting to SEK 5,393 million (EUR 548 million) at 31 December 2017 (2016: EUR 565 million). There are two types of guarantees given on behalf of Forsmark Kraftgrupp AB and OKG AB. The Financing Amount is given to compensate for the current deficit in the Nuclear Waste Fund, assuming that no further nuclear waste fees are paid in. This deficit is calculated as the difference between the expected costs and the funds to cover these costs at the time of the calculation. The Supplementary Amount constitutes a guarantee for deficits that can arise as a result of unplanned events. The Financing Amount given by Fortum on behalf of Forsmark Kraftgrupp AB and OKG AB was SEK 3,843 million (EUR 391 million) and the Supplementary Amount was SEK 1,550 million (EUR 157 million) at 31 December 2017.
38 39 40
Investor information
Basis of preparation Risks Income statement Balance sheet Off balance sheet items Group structure and related parties
36.1 Group companies
No tax cases with material impact in Finland.
Fortum received income tax assessments in Sweden for the years 2009, 2010, 2011 and 2012 in December 2011, December 2012, December 2013 and October 2014, respectively. According to the tax authorities, Fortum would have to pay additional income taxes for the years 2009, 2010, 2011 and 2012 for the reallocation of loans between the Swedish subsidiaries in 2004–2005. In June 2017 the Administrative Court of Appeal in Stockholm, Sweden announced its decision relating to the income tax assessments for 2009–2012. The decisions were unfavourable to Fortum. Fortum disagrees with the interpretation of the Administrative Court of Appeal and has applied for the right to appeal from the Supreme Administrative Court. Due to the unfavourable decisions from the Administrative Court of Appeal, Fortum has booked a tax cost of SEK 1,106 million (EUR 115 million) and interest expense of SEK 69 million (EUR 7 million), in total SEK 1,175 million (EUR 122 million) in the second quarter 2017 results. The additional taxes and interest for 2009–2012 have already been paid in June 2016. Fortum has filed a request to initiate a mutual agreement procedure between Sweden and the Netherlands for the year 2012.
In addition Fortum has received income tax assessments in Sweden for the years 2013, 2014 and 2015 in December 2015, December 2016 and October 2017, respectively. The assessments concerns the loans given in 2013, 2014 and 2015 by Fortum's Dutch financing company to Fortum's subsidiaries in Sweden. The interest income for these loans was taxed in the Netherlands. The tax authorities considers just over a half of the interest relating to each loan as deductible, i.e. deriving from business needs. The rest of the interest is seen as non-deductible. The decision is based on the changes in the Swedish tax regulation in 2013. Fortum considers that the claims are unjustifiable and has appealed the decisions. In May 2017 the Administrative Court in Stockholm, Sweden, announced its decisions relating to the income tax assessment for the year 2013. The decisions were unfavourable to Fortum. Fortum disagrees with the argumentation of the court and has filed an appeal to the Administrative Court of Appeal in Stockholm in July 2017. The cases regarding the year 2014 and the year 2015 are pending before the Administrative Court. In December 2017, the Swedish tax authorities withdrew a part of their claims with respect to the years 2013 and 2015. Therefore, the additional tax claimed by the tax authorities for the year 2013 is currently SEK 239 million (EUR 24 million) and for the year 2015 SEK 186 million (EUR 19 million). For the year 2015 the adjusted amount was confirmed in a new tax assessment ("Obligatoriskt
omprövningsbeslut") issued by the Swedish tax authorities in December 2017. The adjusted amount of additional tax for the year 2013 still needs to be confirmed by the Administrative Court of Appeal, as the additional tax according to the decision of Administrative Court from May 2017 was SEK 273 million (EUR 28 million).
Based on legal analysis supporting legal opinions, no provision has been recognized in the financial statements for the Swedish tax cases regarding the year 2013, 2014 and 2015. If the amounts of additional tax claimed by the tax authority remain final despite the appeals processes, the impact on net profit would be SEK 239 million (EUR 24 million) for the year 2013, SEK 282 million (EUR 29 million) for the year 2014 and SEK 186 million (EUR 19 million) for the year 2015. The additional taxes and interest for 2013, in total SEK 282 million (EUR 29 million) have been paid in accordance with the decision from the Administrative Court in July 2017 and based on the legal opinion booked as receivables.
Fortum Sverige AB has received a favourable decision from the Administrative Court in Stockholm in June 2017 relating to the Swedish hydro real estate tax. According to the decision, the increased property tax on hydro power generated electricity comprises unlawful state aid (i.e. the tax law is in conflict with EU legislation) and the property tax shall be set as 0.5 percent of the tax assessment value. The decision relates to the years 2009–2014 and the disputed amount for the five years totalled SEK 508 million tax, SEK 12 million interest (EUR 52 million tax, EUR 1 million interest). The amount has been repaid to Fortum in July 2017 and it has been booked in other current liabilities, not yet as income. The tax authorities has appealed the decision and the case is pending before the Administrative Court of Appeal.
Fortum has received income tax assessments in Belgium for the years 2008, 2009, 2010 and 2011. The tax authorities disagree with the tax treatment of Fortum EIF NV. Fortum finds the tax authorities' interpretation not to be based on the local regulation and has appealed the decisions. The court of First instance in Antwerpen rejected Fortum's appeal for the years 2008 and 2009 in June 2014. Fortum found the decision unjustifiable and appealed to the Court of Appeal.
In January 2016 Fortum received a favourable decision from the Court of Appeal in which the Court disagreed with the tax authorities' interpretation and the tax assessment for 2008 was nullified. The tax authorities disagreed with the decision and filed an appeal to Hof van Cassatie (Supreme Court) in March 2016. Fortum's appeals concerning 2009–2011 are still pending and Fortum expects the remaining years to follow the final decision for 2008. Based on legal analysis and a supporting legal opinion, no provision has been accounted for in the financial statements. The amount of additional tax claimed is approximately EUR 36 million for the year 2008, approximately EUR 27 million for the year 2009, approximately EUR 15 million for the year 2010 and approximately EUR 21 million for the year 2011. The tax has already been paid.
In November 2015 Fortum received an income tax assessment from the Belgian tax authorities for the year 2012. The tax authorities disagree with the tax treatment of Fortum Project Finance NV. Fortum finds the tax authorities' interpretation not to be based on the local regulation and has filed an objection against the tax adjustment. In line with treatment of the cases concerning 2008–2011, no provision has been accounted for in the financial statements. The amount of additional tax claimed is approximately EUR 15 million for the year 2012. The tax has already been paid.
For critical accounting estimates regarding uncertain tax positions, see Note 27 Income taxes in balance sheet. See also Note 12 Income tax expense.
In addition to the litigations described above, some Group companies are involved in other routine tax and other disputes incidental to their normal conduct of business. Based on the information currently available, management does not consider the liabilities arising out of such litigations likely to be material to the Group's financial position.
In Finland, Fortum is participating in the country's fifth nuclear power plant unit, Olkiluoto 3 (OL3), through the shareholding in Teollisuuden Voima Oyj (TVO) with an approximately 25% share representing some 400 MW in capacity. Most of the construction work for the plant unit have been completed. The installation of the electrical systems, the instrumentation and control system (I&C), and mechanical systems is still in progress.
In April 2016 TVO submitted to the Ministry of Economic Affairs and Employment (TEM) an application for an operating license. The simulator training for operating personnel commenced in February 2017. The cold functional testing to ensure the integrity of the primary circuit was completed in July. The hot functional testing phase started in December. In the hot functional tests which will take several months, the OL3 plant systems are tested as a whole, but without the fuel.The first phase of the turbine plant commissioning is completed. The de-preservation that started at the turbine plant in January 2017 has been completed, and the plant is ready for the hot functional testing.
OL3 was procured as a fixed-price turnkey project from a consortium (Supplier) formed by AREVA GmbH, AREVA NP SAS and Siemens AG. As stipulated in the plant contract, the consortium companies have joint and several liability for the contractual obligations. In accordance with the Supplier's schedule, updated in October 2017, regular electricity production in the unit was to commence in May 2019. The Supplier's schedule review for the project completion had reached a phase where the Supplier confirmed the main milestones. According to the Supplier, the first connection to the grid takes place in December 2018, and the start of regular electricity production will take place in May 2019. According to the Supplier's plant ramp-up program the unit will produce 2–4 TWh of electricity, at varying power levels, during the period of time between the first connection to the grid and the start of regular electricity production.
In December 2008 the OL3 Supplier initiated the International Chamber of Commerce (ICC) arbitration proceedings and submitted a claim concerning the delay and the ensuing costs incurred at the Olkiluoto 3 project. The Supplier has submitted claims to the ICC for an aggregate amount of approximately EUR 3.59 billion, which includes a total amount of approximately EUR 1.58 billion in penalty interest (calculated up to 30 June 2017) and payments allegedly delayed by TVO under the Plant Contract, as well as approximately EUR 132 million of alleged loss of profit.
In 2012, TVO submitted a counter-claim and defence in the matter. In July 2015, TVO updated its quantification estimate of its costs and losses to the amount of approximately EUR 2.6 billion until December 2018, which according to the schedule submitted by the OL3 supplier in September 2014 was the estimated start of regular electricity production of OL3.
In November 2016, the ICC Tribunal made a final and binding partial award. In the partial award, the ICC Tribunal addressed the early period of the project (time schedule, licensing and licencability, and system design). This comprised many of the facts and matters that TVO relies upon in its main claims against the supplier, as well as certain key matters that the supplier relies upon in its claims against TVO. In doing so, the partial award finally resolved the great majority of these facts and matters in favour of TVO, and conversely rejected the great majority of the supplier's contentions in this regard. The partial award did not take a position on the claimed monetary amounts.
The ICC Tribunal made another final and binding partial award in July 2017. This partial award addresses the preparation, submittal, review, and approval of design and licensing documents on the project. This comprises the key facts and matters that the supplier relies upon in its main claims against TVO, as well as certain matters that TVO relies upon in its claims against the Supplier. In doing so, the partial award has finally resolved the great majority of these facts and matters in favour of TVO. Conversely, it has also rejected the great majority of the Supplier's contentions in this regard. Although the partial award did not take a position on the claimed monetary amounts, it has conclusively rejected the analytical method used by the Supplier to support its principal monetary claims against TVO.
The parties received a final and binding partial award also in November 2017. This partial award addresses the execution and construction works and the overall project management of the OL3 EPR project. This comprises many facts and matters that TVO relies upon in its main claim against the Supplier, as well as certain matters that the Supplier relies upon in its claims against TVO. The partial award finally resolves many of the facts and matters concerning the execution of the construction works in favour of TVO and notably defers many of the issues raised by TVO including the Supplier's project management for determination in a subsequent award.
The arbitration proceeding is still going on and it now proceeds towards the final award where the Tribunal will declare liabilities to pay compensation.
In 2016, Areva announced a restructuring of its business. The restructuring plan involved a transfer of the operations of Areva NP to a company called NEW NP, the majority owner of which is going to be EDF. The transaction was completed at the end of 2017, and thereafter 75.5 percent of the shares of New NP were transferred to EDF. New NP was renamed Framatome as of January 2018. OL3 EPR project and the means required to complete the project, as well as certain other liabilities will remain within AREVA NP and AREVA GmbH, within the scope of AREVA SA. In January 2017, the EU Commission made a decision
40
| Operating and financial review |
Consolidated | financial statements | Notes | Key figures 2008–2017 |
Parent company financial statements |
shown on the balance sheet | Proposal for the use of the profit | Auditor's report |
Operational key figures Quarterly financial information |
Investor information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Basis of preparation | Risks | Income statement | Balance sheet | Off balance sheet items | Group structure and related parties |
on the state aid, and in May 2017, the Commission accepted the merger. In September 2017, TVO filed an appeal to the General Court of the European Union of the Commission decision on French state aid to the AREVA Group. TVO requires that the restructuring of the French nuclear industry will not compromise the completion of the OL3 EPR project within the Supplier's schedule and that all liabilities of the plant contract are respected.
On 8 January 2018, E.ON SE announced that it had decided to tender its 170,720,340 Uniper SE shares (corresponding to 46.65% of shares and voting rights) into Fortum's public takeover offer. Furthermore, E.ON announced that the members of the E.ON Board of Management who have until now held Uniper shares privately will also tender all of their shares to Fortum under the voluntary public takeover offer.
On 19 January 2018, Fortum announced that 46.93% of the share capital and the voting rights in Uniper were tendered during the initial acceptance period of Fortum's voluntary public takeover offer for the outstanding shares of Uniper corresponding to 171,736,647 shares. The initial acceptance period ended on 16 January 2018 and the additional acceptance period resumed on 20 January 2018 and will end on 2 February 2018.
| EUR million | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|
| Gross investments in shares in subsidiary companies | 982 | 813 |
| Gross investments in shares in associated companies and joint ventures | 135 | 17 |
| Gross investments in available for sale financial assets | 8 | 14 |
| Gross investments in shares | 1,125 | 844 |
On 26 September 2017, Fortum announced it had signed a transaction agreement with E.ON under which E.ON has the right to tender its 46.65% shareholding in Uniper in early 2018. In November 2017 Fortum launched a voluntary public takeover offer to all Uniper shareholders at a total value of EUR 22 per share.
On 8 January 2018, E.ON SE announced that it had decided to tender its 170,720,340 Uniper SE shares (corresponding to 46.65% of shares and voting rights) into Fortum's public takeover offer. Furthermore, E.ON announced that the members of the E.ON Board of Management who have until now held Uniper shares privately will also tender all of their shares to Fortum under the voluntary public takeover offer.
On 19 January 2018, Fortum announced that the number of shares tendered during the initial acceptance period of Fortum's voluntary public takeover offer for the outstanding shares of Uniper totalled 171,736,647 shares. This corresponds to approximately 46.93% of the share capital and the voting rights of Uniper. The initial acceptance period ended on 16 January 2018 and the additional acceptance period resumed on 20 January 2018 and will end on 2 February 2018. The value of the tendered shares from the initial acceptance period is EUR 3.78 billion based on the total value of EUR 22 per share.
In January 2017 Fortum completed the acquisition of 100% of the shares in three wind power companies from the Norwegian company Nordkraft. The transaction consists of the Nygårdsfjellet wind farm, which is already operational, as well as the fully-permitted Ånstadblåheia and Sørfjord projects. Fortum has started the construction of the Ånstadblåheia and Sørfjord projects, expected to be commissioned in 2018 and 2019. When built the installed capacity of the three wind farms would total approximately 170 MW.
Fortum started a redemption process for the remaining shares of Ekokem Corporation (renamed as Fortum Waste Solution Oy) in October 2016. The process was finalized in March 2017 after which Fortum owns 100% of the shares in the company.
On 4 August Fortum concluded the restructuring of the ownership in Hafslund together with the City of Oslo. Fortum sold its 34.1% stake in Hafslund ASA to the City of Oslo. Fortum acquired 100% of Hafslund Markets AS, 50% of Hafslund Varme AS (renamed as Fortum Oslo Varme AS) including the City of Oslo's waste-to-energy company Klemetsrudanlegget AS (renamed as Fortum Oslo Varme KEA AS) and 10% of Hafslund Produksjon Holding AS. The total debt-free price of the acquisition was approximately EUR 940 million.
The combined net cash investment of the transactions, including the dividend received in May 2017, was approximately EUR 230 million.
Hafslund Markets and Fortum Oslo Varme are consolidated into Fortum Group from 1 August 2017. Hafslund Markets is consolidated as a part of the Consumer Solutions segment. Fortum has operational responsibility of Fortum Oslo Varme, which is consolidated as a subsidiary with 50% non-controlling interest into the results of City Solutions segment. Hafslund Produksjon Holding is treated as an
| Operating and | Consolidated | Notes | Key figures | Parent company | Proposal for the use of the profit | Auditor's | Operational key figures | Investor | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| financial review | financial statements | 2008–2017 | financial statements | shown on the balance sheet | report | Quarterly financial information | information | ||
| Basis of preparation Risks Income statement Balance sheet Off balance sheet items Group structure and related parties |
associated company and reported in the Generation segment. The initial goodwill from the purchase price allocations, prepared based on the 31 July balance sheets, is EUR 215 million for Hafslund Markets and EUR 69 million for Fortum Oslo Varme respectively. The initial purchase price allocation is still preliminary as all valuation effects, especially regarding the provisions, have not been finalised.
The impact from Hafslund acquisition on 2017 sales in the Consumer Solutions segment was EUR 344 million, comparable operating profit EUR 13 million and comparable EBITDA EUR 22 million. The impact on 2017 sales in the City Solutions segment was EUR 56 million, comparable operating profit EUR 15 million and comparable EBITDA EUR 29 million.
| EUR million | Hafslund Markets AS |
Fortum Oslo Varme AS |
Other | Fortum total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Consideration paid in cash | 589 | 152 | 70 | 811 |
| Unpaid consideration | 0 | 0 | 9 | 9 |
| Total consideration | 589 | 152 | 79 | 820 |
| Fair value of the acquired assets | 374 | 84 | 77 | 535 |
| Translation difference | 1 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Goodwill | 215 | 69 | 1 | 286 |
In December 2017 Fortum acquired three solar power companies from Hevel Group. The Pleshanovskaya (10 MW) and Grachevskaya (10 MW) solar power plants are located in the Orenburg region and the Bugulchanskaya (15 MW) solar power plant in the Republic of Bashkortostan. All three power plants are operational and will receive capacity Supply Agreement (CSA) payments for approximately 15 years after commissioning at an average CSA price corresponding to approximately EUR 430/MWh. The plants were commissioned in 2016 and 2017.
| Hafslund Markets AS | Fortum Oslo Varme AS | Fortum total 1) | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EUR million | Acquired book values |
Allocated fair value |
Total fair value | Acquired book values |
Allocated fair value |
Total fair value | Acquired book values |
Allocated fair value |
Total fair value | |
| Fair value of the acquired net identifiable assets | ||||||||||
| Cash and cash equivalents | 158 | 158 | 37 | 37 | 201 | 201 | ||||
| Intangible assets | 12 | 284 | 296 | 0 | 0 | 17 | 334 | 352 | ||
| Property, plant and equipment | 5 | 5 | 526 | 207 | 733 | 604 | 208 | 811 | ||
| Other assets | 179 | 179 | 21 | 21 | 206 | 206 | ||||
| Deferred tax liabilities | -19 | -68 | -88 | -21 | -50 | -71 | -46 | -129 | -175 | |
| Other non-interest bearing liabilities | -176 | -176 | -39 | -39 | -217 | -217 | ||||
| Interest-bearing liabilities | 0 | 0 | -445 | -445 | -489 | -489 | ||||
| Net identifiable assets | 158 | 216 | 374 | 79 | 157 | 237 | 275 | 413 | 688 | |
| Non-controlling interests | 0 | 0 | 0 | 51 | 102 | 153 | 51 | 102 | 153 | |
| Total | 158 | 216 | 374 | 29 | 55 | 84 | 225 | 310 | 535 |
1) Including acquired book values and allocated fair values from the acquisition of Norwegian wind park companies, Russian solar power companies as well as other smaller acquisitions.
| EUR million | Hafslund Markets AS |
Fortum Oslo Varme AS |
Other | Fortum total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross investment | ||||
| Purchase consideration settled | ||||
| in cash | 589 | 152 | 70 | 811 |
| Cash and cash equivalents in | ||||
| acquired subsidiaries | 158 | 37 | 6 | 201 |
| Translation difference | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3 |
| Cash outflow in acquisition | 432 | 116 | 65 | 613 |
| Unpaid consideration | 9 | 9 | ||
| Interest-bearing debt in acquired | ||||
| subsidiaries | 445 | 44 | 489 | |
| of which loans given by Fortum | -213 | -213 | ||
| Transaction adjustments to debt-like | ||||
| items | 54 | 26 | 0 | 80 |
| Translation difference | 0 | 1 | 2 | 4 |
| Total gross investment in acquired | ||||
| subsidiaries | 486 | 375 | 121 | 982 |
The acquisition of approximately 81% of the shares in the Nordic circular economy company Ekokem Corporation (renamed as Fortum Waste Solutions Oy) was finalised on 31 August 2016. The debt and cash-free purchase price for 100% of the company was approximately EUR 680 million. Fortum also made a tender offer valid until end of September to the remaining shareholders at the same price of 165 EUR per share. By the end of December Fortum's total shareholding was 98.2%.
The initial purchase price allocation as of 31 August 2016 was finalised during 2017. No material changes were made to the initial purchase price allocation.
Fortum Waste Solutions Oy is fully consolidated into Fortum Group from the end of August 2016 and has been integrated as a business area into the City Solutions segment. The comparative numbers in the financial statement include the income statement effect of Fortum Waste Solutions from 1 September 2016 onwards. The consolidated sales for 2017 included in the City Solutions segment was EUR 293 million (Sept to Dec 2016: 105), comparable operating profit EUR 24 million (Sept to Dec 2016: 7) and comparable EBITDA EUR 74 million (Sept to Dec 2016: 26).
On 8 January 2016, Fortum made a public tender offer in Poland to purchase all shares in Grupa DUON S.A. (renamed as Fortum Markets Polska S.A.), an electricity and gas sales company listed on the Warsaw Stock Exchange. During the subscription period that ended on 26 February 2016 Fortum received subscriptions from shareholders representing altogether 93.35% shares in the company at the offered price PLN 3.85 per share. The remaining shares were purchased from shareholders under the mandatory squeeze-out procedure at the same price per share. In April Fortum obtained 100% of shares in Fortum Markets Polska S.A. and in June the company was delisted.
This financial statement includes the income statement effect of Grupa Duon S.A. group from 1 April 2016 onwards. The consolidated sales for 2017 included in the Consumer Solutions segment was EUR 266 million (April–Dec 2016: 155), comparable operating profit EUR 0 million (April–Dec 2016: 4) and comparable EBITDA EUR 4 million (April-Dec 2016: 8).
The initial purchase price allocation as of 31 March 2016 was finalised during 2017. No material changes were made compared to the information disclosed in the consolidated financial statements for 2016.
Other acquisitions include the shares of Info24 AB and Turebergs Recycling AB. On 1 April 2016 Fortum acquired 100% of the shares in the Swedish IT company Info24, a company specialised in the development of business solutions within the IoT, Internet of Things. On 21 December 2016 Fortum acquired 100% of the shares in Turebergs Recycling AB, a Swedish company with main business in environmental construction, recycling and processing of bottom ash from waste-to-energy plants.
| EUR million | Fortum Waste Solutions Oy |
Fortum Markets Polska S.A. |
Other | Fortum total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Consideration paid in cash | 570 | 106 | 15 | 691 |
| Unpaid consideration | 10 | 3 | 13 | |
| Total consideration | 580 | 106 | 17 | 703 |
| Fair value of the acquired assets | 440 | 86 | 17 | 543 |
| Translation difference | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| Goodwill | 141 | 22 | 0 | 163 |
| Operating and | Consolidated | Notes | Key figures | Parent company | Proposal for the use of the profit | Auditor's | Operational key figures | Investor |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| financial review | financial statements | 2008–2017 | financial statements | shown on the balance sheet | report | Quarterly financial information | information | |
| Basis of preparation Risks Income statement Balance sheet Off balance sheet items Group structure and related parties |
| Fortum Waste Solutions Oy | Fortum Markets Polska S.A. | Fortum total 1) | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EUR million | Acquired book values |
Allocated fair value |
Total fair value | Acquired book values |
Allocated fair value |
Total fair value | Acquired book values |
Allocated fair value |
Total fair value | |
| Fair value of the acquired net identifiable assets | ||||||||||
| Cash and cash equivalents | 17 | 17 | 8 | 8 | 26 | 26 | ||||
| Tangible and intangible assets | 315 | 387 | 702 | 49 | 34 | 83 | 366 | 438 | 804 | |
| Other assets | 67 | 67 | 37 | 37 | 108 | 108 | ||||
| Deferred tax liabilities | -34 | -77 | -112 | -1 | -7 | -7 | -35 | -88 | -123 | |
| Other non-interest bearing liabilities | -117 | -117 | -16 | -16 | -135 | -135 | ||||
| Interest-bearing liabilities | -117 | -117 | -19 | -19 | -136 | -136 | ||||
| Net identifiable assets | 131 | 309 | 441 | 58 | 28 | 86 | 194 | 351 | 545 | |
| Non-controlling interests | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| Total | 131 | 309 | 440 | 58 | 28 | 86 | 192 | 351 | 543 |
1) Including acquired book values and allocated fair values from the acquisition of Info24 AB and Turebergs Recycling AB.
| EUR million | Fortum Waste Solutions Oy |
Fortum Markets Polska S.A. |
Other | Fortum total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross investment | ||||
| Purchase consideration settled in cash | 570 | 106 | 15 | 691 |
| Cash and cash equivalents in acquired | ||||
| subsidiaries | 17 | 8 | 1 | 26 |
| Cash outflow in acquisition | 553 | 98 | 14 | 664 |
| Unpaid consideration | 10 | 3 | 13 | |
| Interest-bearing debt in acquired | ||||
| subsidiaries | 117 | 19 | 0 | 136 |
| Total gross investment in acquired | ||||
| subsidiaries | 680 | 117 | 17 | 813 |
In April 2017, Fortum and RUSNANO, a Russian state-owned development company, signed a 50/50 investment partnership in order to secure the possibility of a Russian Capacity Supply Agreement (CSA) wind portfolio in Russia. The wind investment fund 50/50 owned by Fortum and RUSNANO was awarded 1,000 MW wind capacity in Russian wind CSA auction in June 2017. The investments decisions will be made on a case-by-case basis within the total mandate of the wind investment fund. Fortum's equity stake in the wind investment fund totals a maximum of RUB 15 billion (currently approximately EUR 220 million). The amount is invested over time (within approximately 5 years) as it is subject to positive investment decisions. During 2017 Fortum invested EUR 43 million in the fund.
In October 2017 Fortum and SUENKO established a joint venture, JSC Ural-Siberian Heat and Power Company (YUSTEK), for the heat supply in Tyumen, Russia. Fortum will continue as CHP owner and selling heat to YUSTEK.
| EUR million | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|
| Gross divestments of shares in subsidiary companies | 55 | 127 |
| Gross divestments of shares in associated companies and joint ventures | 687 | 34 |
| Gross divestments of shares | 742 | 161 |
In May 2017, Fortum agreed to sell 100% of its shares in the Polish gas infrastructure company DUON Dystrybucja S.A. to Infracapital, the infrastructure investment arm of M&G Investments. DUON Dystrybucja S.A. is transporting grid gas and LNG in Poland. The company was acquired as part of the acquisition of the electricity and gas sales company Grupa DUON S.A. (currently Fortum Markets Polska S.A.) in 2016. Fortum booked in 2017 a one-time pre-tax sales gain in Consumer Solution segment totalling EUR 2 million.
In November 2017 Fortum sold its 51% stake in the Norwegian electricity sales company Røyken Kraft AS to the minority shareholder Røyken Energiverk AS. The company was acquired as part of the Hafslund Markets AS group in the restructuring of the ownership in Hafslund.
In February 2016 Fortum sold its 100% shareholding in its Russian subsidiary OOO Tobolsk CHP to SIBUR, Russia's largest integrated gas processing and petrochemicals company. OOO Tobolsk CHP owns and operates the combined heat and power (CHP) plant in the city of Tobolsk in Western Siberia. Fortum booked a one-time pre-tax sales gain in Russia segment totalling EUR 35 million.
| EUR million | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|
| Gross divestments of shares in subsidiary companies | 55 | 127 |
| Liquid funds in sold subsidiaries | 5 | 10 |
| Sales price including liquid funds in sold subsidiaries | 60 | 137 |
| Intangible assets and property, plant and equipment | 58 | 92 |
| Other non-current and current assets | 6 | 15 |
| Liquid funds | 5 | 10 |
| Interest-bearing loans | -3 | 0 |
| Other liabilities and provisions | -7 | -15 |
| Net assets divested | 59 | 102 |
| Gain on sale | 2 | 35 |
On 3 August 2017 Fortum sold its 34.1% stake in Hafslund ASA to the City of Oslo in connection with the restructuring of the ownership in Hafslund. Fortum booked a one-time tax-free sales gain in Other segment in the 2017 results totalling approximately EUR 324 million including transaction costs, corresponding EUR 0.36 earnings per share.
In March 2016 Fortum concluded the divestment of its 51.4% shareholding in the Estonian natural gas import, sales and distribution company AS Eesti Gaas. Fortum sold its shareholding to Trilini Energy OÜ. The sale resulted in a one-time pre-tax sales gain in City Solutions segment totalling EUR 11 million.
At the end of 2017, the Finnish State owned 50.76% of the Company's shares. The Finnish Parliament has authorised the Government to reduce the Finnish State's holding in Fortum Corporation to no less than 50.1% of the share capital and voting rights.
All transactions between Fortum and other companies owned by the Finnish State are on arm's length basis.
On 31 August 2016 Fortum finalised the acquisition of Ekokem Corporation with the four biggest owners, representing approximately 81% of the shares. The Finnish State was among the biggest owners with a 34%-shareholding in Ekokem. For more information see Note 38 Acquisitions and disposals.
The key management personnel of the Fortum Group are the members of Fortum Executive Management and the Board of Directors. Fortum has not been involved in any material transactions with members of the Board of Directors or Fortum Executive Management. No loans exist to any member of the Board of Directors or Fortum Executive Management at 31 December 2017. The total compensation (including pension benefits and social costs) for the key management personnel for 2017 was EUR 9 million (2016: 10).
See Note 10 Employee benefits for further information on the Board of Directors and Fortum Executive Management remuneration and shareholdings.
In the ordinary course of business Fortum engages in transactions on commercial terms with associated companies and other related parties, which are on same terms as they would be for third parties, except for some associates as discussed later in this note.
Fortum owns shareholdings in associated companies and joint ventures which in turn own hydro and nuclear power plants. Under the consortium agreements, each owner is entitled to electricity in proportion to its share of ownership or other agreements. Each owner is liable for an equivalent portion of costs regardless of output. These associated companies are not profit making, since the owners purchase electricity at production cost including interest costs and production taxes.
For further information on transactions and balances with associated companies and joint ventures, see Note 18 Participations in associated companies and joint ventures.
The Fortum pension funds in Finland and Sweden are stand-alone legal entities which manage pension assets related to the part of the pension coverage in Sweden and Finland. The assets in the pension fund in Finland include Fortum shares representing 0.04% (2016: 0.04%) of the company's outstanding shares. Real estate and premises owned by the Finnish pension fund have been leased to Fortum. Fortum has not paid contributions to the pension funds in 2017 nor in 2016. Real estate mortgages have also been given for loan from Fortum's Finnish pension fund for EUR 41 million (2016: 41).
| Group | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Company name | Domicile | Segment | holding, % |
| Ekopartnerit Turku Oy | Finland | C | 51.0 |
| Fortum Asiakaspalvelu Oy | 2) Finland | CS | 100.0 |
| Fortum Assets Oy | Finland | O | 100.0 |
| Fortum C&H Oy | Finland | O | 100.0 |
| Fortum Environmental Construction Oy | Finland | C | 100.0 |
| Fortum Growth Oy | Finland | O | 100.0 |
| Fortum Heat and Gas Oy | 2) Finland | C, O | 100.0 |
| Fortum Markets Oy | 2) Finland | CS | 100.0 |
| Fortum Norm Oy | 2) Finland | O | 100.0 |
| Fortum Power and Heat Holding Oy | Finland | G | 100.0 |
| Fortum Power and Heat Oy | 2) Finland | C, G, O | 100.0 |
| Fortum Real Estate Oy | 2) Finland | O | 100.0 |
| Fortum Waste Solutions Oy | 2) Finland | C | 100.0 |
| Kiinteistö Oy Espoon Energiatalo | Finland | O | 100.0 |
| Koillis-Pohjan Energiantuotanto Oy | Finland | G | 100.0 |
| Kotimaan Energia Oy | 1) Finland | CS | 100.0 |
| Oy Pauken Ab | Finland | O | 100.0 |
| Oy Tersil Ab | Finland | O | 100.0 |
| Oy Tertrade Ab | Finland | O | 100.0 |
| Vindin Böle Ab/Oy | 1) Finland | O | 100.0 |
| Vindin Kalax Ab/Oy | 1) Finland | O | 100.0 |
| Vindin Molpe Ab/Oy | 1) Finland | O | 100.0 |
| Vindin Pjelax Ab/Oy | 1) Finland | O | 100.0 |
| Vindin Poikel Norra Ab/Oy | 1) Finland | O | 100.0 |
| Vindin Pörtom Ab/Oy | 1) Finland | O | 100.0 |
| Fortum Project Finance N.V. | 2) Belgium | O | 100.0 |
| Fortum Energi A/S | Denmark | CS | 100.0 |
| Fortum Waste Solutions A/S | Denmark | C | 100.0 |
| Fortum Waste Solutions OW A/S | Denmark | C | 100.0 |
| AS Anne Soojus | Estonia | C | 60.0 |
| Company name | Domicile | Segment | Group holding, % |
|---|---|---|---|
| AS Fortum Tartu | Estonia | C | 60.0 |
| AS Tartu Joujaam | Estonia | C | 60.0 |
| AS Tartu Keskkatlamaja | Estonia | C | 60.0 |
| Fortum CFS Eesti OU | Estonia | O | 100.0 |
| Fortum Eesti AS | Estonia | C | 100.0 |
| Fortum France S.A.S | France | O | 100.0 |
| Fortum Deutschland SE | 1) Germany | O | 100.0 |
| Fortum Service Deutschland GmbH | Germany | C | 100.0 |
| Fortum Carlisle Limited | Great Britain | C | 100.0 |
| Fortum Energy Ltd | Great Britain | O | 100.0 |
| Fortum Glasgow Limited | Great Britain | C | 100.0 |
| Fortum O&M(UK) Limited | Great Britain | C | 100.0 |
| IVO Energy Limited | Great Britain | G | 100.0 |
| Fortum Insurance Ltd | Guernsey | O | 100.0 |
| Fortum Amrit Energy Private Limited | India | O | 100.0 |
| Fortum FinnSurya Energy Private Limited | India | O | 100.0 |
| Fortum India Private Limited | India | O | 100.0 |
| Fortum Solar India Private Limited | India | O | 100.0 |
| Fortum Finance Ireland Designated Activity Company | 2) Ireland | O | 100.0 |
| Fortum P&H Ireland Limited | 1) Ireland | O | 100.0 |
| Fortum Participation Ltd | 1) Ireland | O | 100.0 |
| Fortum Jelgava, SIA | Latvia | C | 100.0 |
| Fortum Latvia SIA | Latvia | C | 100.0 |
| UAB Fortum Heat Lietuva | Lithuania | C | 100.0 |
| UAB Fortum Klaipeda | Lithuania | C | 96.0 |
| UAB Joniskio energija | Lithuania | C | 66.2 |
| UAB Svencioniu energija | Lithuania | C | 50.0 |
| Fortum Investment SARL | Luxembourg | O | 100.0 |
| Fortum Luxembourg SARL | Luxembourg | O | 100.0 |
| Fortum Forvaltning AS | Norway | O | 100.0 |
| Fortum Markets AS | Norway | CS | 100.0 |
| Fortum Oslo Varme AS | 1) Norway | C | 50.0 |
| Fortum Oslo Varme KEA AS | 1) Norway | C | 50.0 |
| Fortum Waste Solutions Norway AS | Norway | C | 100.0 |
| Fredrikstad EnergiSalg AS | 1) Norway | CS | 100.0 |
| Hafslund Hedging AS | 1) Norway | CS | 100.0 |
| Hafslund Kundesenter AS | 1) Norway | CS | 100.0 |
| Hafslund Marked AS | 1) Norway | CS | 100.0 |
| Hafslund Strøm AS | 1) Norway | CS | 100.0 |
| Operating and | Consolidated | Notes | Key figures | Parent company | Proposal for the use of the profit | Auditor's | Operational key figures | Investor |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| financial review | financial statements | 2008–2017 | financial statements | shown on the balance sheet | report | Quarterly financial information | information | |
| Basis of preparation | Risks | Income statement | Balance sheet | Off balance sheet items Group structure and related parties |
| Company name | Domicile | Segment | Group holding, % |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hafslund Tellier AS | 1) Norway | CS | 100.0 |
| Hallingkraft AS | 1) Norway | CS | 100.0 |
| Mitt Hjem Norge AS | 1) Norway | CS | 100.0 |
| NorgesEnergi AS | 1) Norway | CS | 100.0 |
| Nygårdsfjellet Vindpark AS | 1) Norway | O | 100.0 |
| Oslo Energi AS | 1) Norway | CS | 100.0 |
| Solvencia AS | 1) Norway | CS | 100.0 |
| Sørfjord Vindpark AS | 1) Norway | O | 100.0 |
| Ånstadblåheia Vindpark AS | 1) Norway | O | 100.0 |
| AMB Energia Sprzedaż Sp. z o.o. | Poland | CS | 100.0 |
| Fortum Customer Services Polska Sp. z o.o. | Poland | CS | 100.0 |
| Fortum Marketing and Sales Polska S.A. | Poland | CS | 100.0 |
| Fortum Markets Polska S.A. | Poland | CS | 100.0 |
| Fortum Network Częstochowa Sp. z o.o. | Poland | C | 100.0 |
| Fortum Network Płock Sp. z o.o. | Poland | C | 100.0 |
| Fortum Network Wrocław Sp. z o.o. | Poland | C | 100.0 |
| Fortum Power and Heat Polska Sp. z o.o. | Poland | C, CS | 100.0 |
| Fortum Silesia SA | Poland | C | 100.0 |
| Fortum Sprzedaż Sp. z o.o. | Poland | CS | 100.0 |
| Rejonowa Spółka Ciepłownicza Sp. z o.o. | Poland | C | 100.0 |
| Chelyabinsk Energoremont | Russia | R | 100.0 |
| Fortum New Generation LLC | 1) Russia | R | 98.2 |
| LLC Pleshanovskaya Solar power station | 1) Russia | R | 98.2 |
| LLC Bugulchanskaya Solar power station | 1) Russia | R | 98.2 |
| LLC Grachevskaya Solar power station | 1) Russia | R | 98.2 |
| PAO Fortum | Russia | R | 98.2 |
| Ural Heat Networks Company Joint Stock Company | Russia | R | 98.2 |
| Escandinava de Electricidad S.L.U | 1) Spain | CS | 100.0 |
| Blybergs Kraftaktiebolag | Sweden | G | 66.7 |
| Brännälven Kraft AB | Sweden | G | 67.0 |
| Bullerforsens Kraft Aktiebolag | Sweden | G | 88.0 |
| Energibolaget i Sverige Holding AB | 1) Sweden | CS | 100.0 |
| Energikundservice Sverige AB | Sweden | CS | 100.0 |
| Fortum 1 AB | Sweden | R | 100.0 |
| Fortum Fastigheter AB | Sweden | O | 100.0 |
| Fortum Markets AB | Sweden | CS | 100.0 |
| Group | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Company name Fortum Produktionsnät AB |
Domicile Sweden |
Segment G |
holding, % 100.0 |
| Fortum Sweden AB | 2) Sweden | O | 100.0 |
| Fortum Sverige AB | Sweden | C, G, O | 100.0 |
| Fortum Waste Solutions AB | Sweden | C | 100.0 |
| Fortum Waste Solutions Holding AB | Sweden | C | 100.0 |
| Fortum Vind Norr AB | Sweden | O | 100.0 |
| Göta Energi AB | 1) Sweden | CS | 100.0 |
| Hafslund Energi AB | 1) Sweden | CS | 100.0 |
| Mellansvensk Kraftgrupp Aktiebolag | Sweden | G | 86.9 |
| Nordgroup Waste Management AB | Sweden | C | 100.0 |
| Oreälvens Kraftaktiebolag | Sweden | G | 65.0 |
| SverigesEnergi Elförsäljning AB | 1) Sweden | CS | 100.0 |
| Tellier Service AB | 1) Sweden | CS | 100.0 |
| Turebergs Recycling AB | Sweden | C | 100.0 |
| Uddeholm Kraft Aktiebolag | Sweden | G | 100.0 |
| VG Power Tools AB | 1) Sweden | C | 100.0 |
| VG Power Turbo AB | 1) Sweden | C | 100.0 |
| Värmlandskraft-OKG-delägarna Aktiebolag | Sweden | G | 73.3 |
| FB Generation Services B.V. | The Netherlands | O | 100.0 |
| Fortum 2 B.V. | The Netherlands | O | 100.0 |
| Fortum 3 B.V. | The Netherlands | O | 100.0 |
| Fortum Charge & Drive B.V. | The Netherlands | O | 100.0 |
| Fortum Finance B.V. | The Netherlands | O | 100.0 |
| Fortum Holding B.V. | 2) The Netherlands | C, G, O | 100.0 |
| Fortum Hydro B.V. | The Netherlands | O | 100.0 |
| Fortum India B.V. | The Netherlands | O | 100.0 |
| Fortum Power Holding B.V. | The Netherlands | O | 100.0 |
| Fortum Russia B.V. | The Netherlands | R | 100.0 |
| Fortum Russia Holding B.V. | The Netherlands | O | 100.0 |
| Fortum SAR B.V. | The Netherlands | O | 100.0 |
| Fortum Star B.V. | The Netherlands | O | 100.0 |
| Fortum Sun B.V. | The Netherlands | O | 100.0 |
| Fortum Wave Power B.V. | The Netherlands | O | 100.0 |
| PolarSolar B.V. | The Netherlands | O | 100.0 |
| RPH Investment B.V. | The Netherlands | R | 100.0 |
40
Fortum announced the sale of Swedish Distribution business in March 2015. After the divestment of the Swedish Distribution business Fortum has no electricity distribution operations and therefore Distribution segment was treated as discontinued operations in 2015, with restatement of year 2014, according to IFRS 5 Non-current Assets Held for Sale and Discontinued Operations.
Investor information
Information in the tables and graphs presented for year 2012 or earlier is not restated due to the adoption of IFRS 10 and IFRS 11. Adoption of standards influences treatment of Fortum's holding in AB Fortum Värme samägt med Stockholms stad (Fortum Värme) in the consolidated financial statements. From 1 January 2014 onwards Fortum Värme is treated as a joint venture and thus consolidated with equity method. Before the change the company was consolidated as a subsidiary with 50% minority interest.
| Change | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EUR million or as indicated | 2008 | 2009 | 2010 | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | 2014 | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 17/16, % |
| Income statement | |||||||||||
| Sales total Fortum | 5,636 | 5,435 | 6,296 | 6,161 | 6,159 | 5,309 | 4,751 | 3,702 | 3,632 | 4,520 | 24 |
| Sales continuing operations | 4,088 | 3,459 | 3,632 | 4,520 | 24 | ||||||
| EBITDA total Fortum 1) | 2,478 | 2,292 | 2,271 | 3,008 | 2,538 | 2,129 | 3,954 | 4,640 | 1,006 | 1,623 | 61 |
| EBITDA continuing operations | 1,673 | 196 | 1,006 | 1,623 | 61 | ||||||
| Comparable EBITDA total Fortum | 2,360 | 2,398 | 2,396 | 2,374 | 2,416 | 1,975 | 1,873 | 1,265 | 1,015 | 1,275 | 26 |
| Comparable EBITDA continuing operations | 1,457 | 1,102 | 1,015 | 1,275 | 26 | ||||||
| Operating profit total Fortum | 1,963 | 1,782 | 1,708 | 2,402 | 1,874 | 1,508 | 3,428 | 4,245 | 633 | 1,158 | 83 |
| - of sales % | 34.8 | 32.8 | 27.1 | 39.0 | 30.4 | 28.4 | 72.2 | 114.7 | 17.4 | 25.6 | |
| Operating profit continuing operations | 1,296 | -150 | 633 | 1,158 | 83 | ||||||
| - of sales % | 31.7 | -4.3 | 17.4 | 25.6 | |||||||
| Comparable operating profit total Fortum | 1,845 | 1,888 | 1,833 | 1,802 | 1,752 | 1,403 | 1,351 | 922 | 644 | 811 | 26 |
| Comparable operating profit continuing operations | 1,085 | 808 | 644 | 811 | 26 | ||||||
| Profit before income tax total Fortum | 1,850 | 1,636 | 1,615 | 2,228 | 1,586 | 1,398 | 3,360 | 4,088 | 595 | 1,111 | 87 |
| - of sales % | 32.8 | 30.1 | 25.7 | 36.2 | 25.8 | 26.3 | 70.7 | 110.4 | 16.4 | 24.6 | |
| Profit before income tax continuing operations | 1,232 | -305 | 595 | 1,111 | 87 | ||||||
| - of sales % | 30.1 | -8.8 | 16.4 | 24.6 | |||||||
| Profit for the period total Fortum | 1,596 | 1,351 | 1,354 | 1,862 | 1,512 | 1,212 | 3,161 | 4,142 | 504 | 882 | 75 |
| - of which attributable to owners of the parent | 1,542 | 1,312 | 1,300 | 1,769 | 1,416 | 1,204 | 3,154 | 4,138 | 496 | 866 | 75 |
| Profit for the period continuing operations | 1,089 | -228 | 504 | 882 | 75 | ||||||
| - of which attributable to owners of the parent | 1,081 | -231 | 496 | 866 | 75 |
| Operating and | Consolidated | Notes | Key figures | Parent company | Proposal for the use of the profit | Auditor's | Operational key figures | Investor |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| financial review | financial statements | 2008–2017 | financial statements | shown on the balance sheet | report | Quarterly financial information | information | |
| Financial key figures | Share key figures | Segment key figures | Definitions of key figures |
| Change | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EUR million or as indicated Financial position and cash flow |
2008 | 2009 | 2010 | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | 2014 | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 17/16, % |
| Capital employed total Fortum | 15,911 | 15,350 | 16,124 | 17,931 | 19,420 | 19,183 | 17,918 | 19,870 | 18,649 | 18,172 | -3 |
| Interest-bearing net debt | 6,179 | 5,969 | 6,826 | 7,023 | 7,814 | 7,793 | 4,217 | -2,195 | -48 | 988 | 2,158 |
| Interest-bearing net debt without Värme financing | 6,658 | 3,664 | N/A | N/A | N/A | ||||||
| Capital expenditure and gross investments in shares total Fortum | 2,624 | 929 | 1,249 | 1,482 | 1,574 | 1,020 | 843 | 669 | 1,435 | 1,815 | 26 |
| - of sales % | 46.6 | 17.1 | 19.8 | 24.1 | 25.6 | 19.2 | 17.7 | 18.1 | 39.5 | 40.2 | |
| Capital expenditure and gross investments in shares continuing operations | 695 | 625 | 1,435 | 1,815 | 26 | ||||||
| Capital expenditure total Fortum | 1,108 | 862 | 1,222 | 1,408 | 1,558 | 1,005 | 774 | 626 | 591 | 690 | 17 |
| Capital expenditure continuing operations | 626 | 582 | 591 | 690 | 17 | ||||||
| Net cash from operating activities total Fortum | 2,002 | 2,264 | 1,437 | 1,613 | 1,382 | 1,548 | 1,762 | 1,381 | 621 | 993 | 60 |
| Net cash from operating activities continuing operations | 1,406 | 1,228 | 621 | 993 | 60 | ||||||
| Key ratios | |||||||||||
| Return on capital employed total Fortum, % | 15.0 | 12.1 | 11.6 | 14.8 | 10.2 | 9.0 | 19.5 | 22.7 | 4.0 | 7.1 | |
| Return on shareholders' equity total Fortum, % | 18.7 | 16.0 | 15.7 | 19.7 | 14.6 | 12.0 | 30.0 | 33.4 | 3.7 | 6.6 | |
| Interest coverage total Fortum | 9.4 | 12.4 | 13.7 | 10.5 | 7.6 | 6.7 | 19.9 | 27.6 | 4.6 | 8.7 | |
| Interest coverage including capitalised borrowing costs total Fortum | 8.6 | 10.3 | 10.0 | 8.5 | 5.7 | 5.3 | 15.7 | 21.5 | 4.1 | 7.8 | |
| Funds from operations/interest-bearing net debt total Fortum, % | 34.1 | 37.6 | 20.5 | 21.5 | 19.9 | 18.8 | 42.9 | -59.7 | -1,503.4 | 83.9 | |
| Funds from operations/interest-bearing net debt without Värme financing | |||||||||||
| total Fortum, % | 22.1 | 49.3 | N/A | N/A | N/A | ||||||
| Gearing, % | 73 | 70 | 78 | 69 | 73 | 77 | 39 | -16 | 0 | 7 | |
| Comparable net debt/EBITDA total Fortum | 2.6 | 2.5 | 2.8 | 3.0 | 3.2 | 3.9 | 2.3 | -1.7 | 0.0 | 0.8 | |
| Comparable net debt/EBITDA without Värme financing | 3.4 | 2.0 | N/A | N/A | N/A | ||||||
| Equity-to-assets ratio, % | 41 | 43 | 40 | 44 | 43 | 43 | 51 | 61 | 62 | 61 | |
| Other data | |||||||||||
| Dividends | 888 | 888 | 888 | 888 | 888 | 977 | 1,155 | 977 | 977 | 977 2) | 0 |
| Research and development expenditure | 27 | 30 | 30 | 38 | 41 | 49 | 41 | 47 | 52 | 53 | 2 |
| - of sales % | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.6 | 0.7 | 0.9 | 1.0 | 1.4 | 1.4 | 1.2 | |
| Average number of employees total Fortum | 14,077 | 13,278 | 11,156 | 11,010 | 10,600 | 9,532 | 8,821 | 8,193 | 7,994 | 8,507 | |
| Average number of employees continuing operations | 8,329 | 8,009 | 7,994 | 8,507 |
1) EBITDA is defined as Operating profit + Depreciation and amortisation.
2) Board of Directors' proposal for the planned Annual General Meeting on 28 March 2018.
See Definitions of key figures.
Financial key figures Share key figures Segment key figures Definitions of key figures
| Change | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EUR million or as indicated Data per share |
2008 | 2009 | 2010 | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | 2014 | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 17/16 % |
| Earnings per share total Fortum | 1.74 | 1.48 | 1.46 | 1.99 | 1.59 | 1.36 | 3.55 | 4.66 | 0.56 | 0.98 | 75 |
| Earnings per share continuing operations | 1.22 | -0.26 | 0.56 | 0.98 | 75 | ||||||
| Earnings per share discontinued operations | - | - | - | - | - | - | 2.33 | 4.92 | - | - | |
| Diluted earnings per share total Fortum | 1.74 | 1.48 | 1.46 | 1.99 | 1.59 | 1.36 | 3.55 | 4.66 | 0.56 | 0.98 | 75 |
| Diluted earnings per share continuing operations | 1.22 | -0.26 | 0.56 | 0.98 | 75 | ||||||
| Diluted earnings per share discontinued operations | - | - | - | - | - | - | 2.33 | 4.92 | - | - | |
| Cash flow per share total Fortum | 2.26 | 2.55 | 1.62 | 1.82 | 1.56 | 1.74 | 1.98 | 1.55 | 0.70 | 1.12 | 60 |
| Cash flow per share continuing operations | 1.38 | 1.38 | 0.70 | 1.12 | 60 | ||||||
| Equity per share | 8.96 | 9.04 | 9.24 | 10.84 | 11.30 | 11.28 | 12.23 | 15.53 | 15.15 | 14.69 | -3 |
| Dividend per share | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.10 | 1.10 | 1.10 | 1.10 | 1.10 1) | 0 |
| Extra dividend | 0.20 | - | - | - | |||||||
| Payout ratio, % | 57.5 | 67.6 | 68.5 | 50.3 | 62.9 | 80.9 | 36.6 | 23.6 | 196.4 | 112.2 1) | |
| Dividend yield, % | 6.6 | 5.3 | 4.4 | 6.1 | 7.1 | 6.6 | 7.2 | 7.9 | 7.5 | 6.7 1) | |
| Price/earnings ratio (P/E) | 8.8 | 12.8 | 15.4 | 8.3 | 8.9 | 12.2 | 5.1 | 3.0 | 26.1 | 16.8 | |
| Share prices | |||||||||||
| At the end of the period | 15.23 | 18.97 | 22.53 | 16.49 | 14.15 | 16.63 | 17.97 | 13.92 | 14.57 | 16.50 | |
| Average | 24.79 | 15.91 | 19.05 | 19.77 | 15.66 | 15.11 | 17.89 | 16.29 | 13.56 | 15.28 | |
| Lowest | 12.77 | 12.60 | 17.18 | 15.53 | 12.81 | 13.10 | 15.13 | 12.92 | 10.99 | 12.69 | |
| Highest | 33.00 | 19.20 | 22.69 | 24.09 | 19.36 | 18.18 | 20.32 | 21.59 | 15.74 | 18.94 | |
| Other data | |||||||||||
| Market capitalisation at the end of the period, EUR million | 13,519 | 16,852 | 20,015 | 14,649 | 12,570 | 14,774 | 15,964 | 12,366 | 12,944 | 14,658 | |
| Trading volumes 2) | |||||||||||
| Number of shares, 1,000 shares | 628,155 | 580,899 | 493,375 | 524,858 | 494,765 | 465,004 | 454,796 | 541,858 | 611,572 | 582,873 | |
| In relation to weighted average number of shares, % | 70.8 | 65.4 | 55.5 | 59.1 | 55.7 | 52.3 | 51.2 | 61.0 | 68.8 | 65.6 | |
| Number of shares, 1,000 shares | 887,638 | 888,367 | 888,367 | 888,367 | 888,367 | 888,367 | 888,367 | 888,367 | 888,367 | 888,367 | |
| Number of shares excluding own shares, 1,000 shares | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | |
| Average number of shares, 1,000 shares | 887,256 | 888,230 | 888,367 | 888,367 | 888,367 | 888,367 | 888,367 | 888,367 | 888,367 | 888,367 | |
| Diluted adjusted average number of shares, 1,000 shares | 887,839 | 888,230 | 888,367 | 888,367 | 888,367 | 888,367 | 888,367 | 888,367 | 888,367 | 888,367 |
1) Board of Directors' proposal for the Annual General Meeting on 28 March 2018.
2) Trading volumes in the table represent volumes traded on Nasdaq Helsinki. In addition to the Nasdaq Helsinki, Fortum shares were traded on several alternative market places, for example at Boat, Cboe and Turquoise, and on the OTC market as well. In 2017, approximately 61% (2016: 63%) of Fortum's shares were traded on markets other than the Nasdaq Helsinki Ltd.
See Definitions of key figures.
Consolidated
Operating and
Following the acquisition of the Russian company, PAO Fortum, Fortum changed its segment reporting during 2008. Comparison numbers were restated in 2008.
Fortum renewed its business structure as of 1 March 2014. The reorganisation lead to a change in Fortum's external financial reporting structure as previously separately reported segments Heat and Electricity Sales were combined into one segment: Heat, Electricity Sales and Solutions.
Fortum has applied new IFRS 10 Consolidated financial statements and IFRS 11 Joint arrangements from 1 January 2014. The effect of applying the new standards to Fortum Group financial information relates to AB Fortum Värme samägt med Stockholm Stad (Fortum Värme), that is treated as a joint venture and thus consolidated with equity method from 1 January 2014 onwards. Before the change the company was consolidated as a subsidiary with 50% minority interest.
Fortum announced the sale of Swedish Distribution business in March 2015. After the divestment of the Swedish Distribution business Fortum does not have any distribution operations and therefore Distribution segment has been treated as discontinued operations starting from 2015 with restatement of year 2014, according to IFRS 5 Non-current Assets Held for Sale and Discontinued Operations.
Fortum reorganised its operating structure as of 1 April 2016. The business divisions are: Generation (mainly the former Power and Technology); City Solutions (mainly the former Heat, Electricity Sales and Solutions) and Russia. Because of the minor financial impact, the comparable segment information for 2015 was not restated.
As of 1 March 2017, the City Solutions division was divided into two divisions: City Solutions and Consumer Solutions, both reported as separate reporting segments (see Note 5 Segment reporting). Fortum has restated its 2016 comparison segment reporting figures in accordance with the new organisation structure.
| Sales by segment, EUR million | 2008 | 2009 | 2010 | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | 2014 | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Generation | 2,892 | 2,531 | 2,702 | 2,481 | 2,415 | 2,252 | 2,156 | 1,722 | 1,657 | 1,677 |
| - of which internal | 0 | 254 | -281 | -24 | 296 | 69 | 85 | 83 | 15 | 15 |
| City Solutions | 1,516 | 1,332 | 1,187 | 782 | 1,015 | |||||
| - of which internal | 87 | 34 | -13 | 1 | 19 | |||||
| Heat | 1,466 | 1,399 | 1,770 | 1,737 | 1,628 | |||||
| - of which internal | 0 | 23 | -8 | 8 | 18 | |||||
| Consumer Solutions | 668 | 1,097 | ||||||||
| - of which internal | 2 | 3 | ||||||||
| Electricity Sales | 1,922 | 1,449 | 1,798 | 900 | 722 | |||||
| - of which internal | 177 | 67 | 158 | 95 | 55 | |||||
| Russia | 489 | 632 | 804 | 920 | 1,030 | 1,119 | 1,055 | 893 | 896 | 1,101 |
| - of which internal | - | - | - | - | - | - | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Other | 83 | 71 | 51 | 108 | 137 | 63 | 58 | 114 | 92 | 102 |
| - of which internal | 82 | -5 | 169 | 115 | -66 | 54 | 44 | 75 | 61 | 67 |
| Distribution | 789 | 800 | 963 | 973 | 1,070 | 1,064 | ||||
| - of which internal | 10 | 13 | 18 | 15 | 37 | 19 | ||||
| Eliminations and Netting of Nord Pool transactions | -2,005 | -1,447 | -1,792 | -958 | -843 | -706 | -513 | -458 | -463 | -470 |
| Total for continuing operations | 5,636 | 5,435 | 6,296 | 6,161 | 6,159 | 5,309 | 4,088 | 3,459 | 3,632 | 4,520 |
| Discontinued operations | 751 | 274 | ||||||||
| Eliminations 1) | -89 | -31 | ||||||||
| Total | 4,751 | 3,702 | 3,632 | 4,520 |
1) Sales to and from discontinued operations.
| Operating and | Consolidated | Notes | Key figures | Parent company | Proposal for the use of the profit | Auditor's | Operational key figures | Investor |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| financial review | financial statements | 2008–2017 | financial statements | shown on the balance sheet | report | Quarterly financial information | information | |
| Financial key figures Share key figures Segment key figures Definitions of key figures |
| Comparable operating profit by segment, EUR million | 2008 | 2009 | 2010 | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | 2014 | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Generation | 1,528 | 1,454 | 1,298 | 1,201 | 1,146 | 859 | 877 | 561 | 417 | 478 |
| City Solutions | 109 | 104 | 108 | 64 | 98 | |||||
| Heat | 250 | 231 | 275 | 278 | 271 | |||||
| Consumer Solutions | 48 | 41 | ||||||||
| Electricity Sales | -33 | 22 | 11 | 27 | 39 | |||||
| Russia | -92 | -20 | 8 | 74 | 68 | 156 | 161 | 201 | 191 | 296 |
| Other | -56 | -61 | -66 | -73 | -92 | -54 | -57 | -63 | -77 | -102 |
| Distribution | 248 | 262 | 307 | 295 | 320 | 332 | ||||
| Comparable operating profit | 1,845 | 1,888 | 1,833 | 1,802 | 1,752 | 1,403 | 1,085 | 808 | 644 | 811 |
| Impairment charges | 0 | -918 | 27 | 6 | ||||||
| Capital gains and other | 85 | 29 | 93 | 284 | 155 | 61 | 305 | 22 | 38 | 326 |
| Changes in fair values of derivatives hedging future cash flow | -65 | 14 | ||||||||
| Nuclear fund adjustment | -11 | 1 | ||||||||
| Other items affecting comparability 1) | 33 | -135 | -218 | 316 | -33 | 45 | -94 | -62 | ||
| Operating profit, continuing operations | 1,963 | 1,782 | 1,708 | 2,402 | 1,874 | 1,508 | 1,296 | -150 | 633 | 1,158 |
| Discontinued operations | 2,132 | 4,395 | ||||||||
| Operating profit | 3,428 | 4,245 | 633 | 1,158 |
1) Other items affecting comparability comprise Changes in fair values of derivatives hedging future cash flow and Nuclear fund adjustment.
| Comparable EBITDA by segment, EUR million | 2008 | 2009 | 2010 | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | 2014 | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Generation | 1,625 | 1,547 | 1,398 | 1,310 | 1,260 | 1,007 | 998 | 680 | 527 | 603 |
| City Solutions | 211 | 204 | 209 | 186 | 262 | |||||
| Heat | 419 | 393 | 462 | 471 | 481 | |||||
| Consumer Solutions | 55 | 57 | ||||||||
| Electricity Sales | -26 | 28 | 13 | 29 | 40 | |||||
| Russia | -25 | 55 | 94 | 148 | 189 | 258 | 304 | 267 | 312 | 438 |
| Other | -46 | -51 | -56 | -66 | -83 | -49 | -49 | -53 | -64 | -83 |
| Distribution | 413 | 426 | 485 | 482 | 529 | 548 | ||||
| Total for continuing operations | 2,360 | 2,398 | 2,396 | 2,374 | 2,416 | 1,975 | 1,457 | 1,102 | 1,015 | 1,275 |
| Discontinued operations | 416 | 163 | ||||||||
| Total | 1,873 | 1,265 | 1,015 | 1,275 |
| Operating and | Consolidated | Notes | Key figures | Parent company | Proposal for the use of the profit | Auditor's | Operational key figures | Investor |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| financial review | financial statements | 2008–2017 | financial statements | shown on the balance sheet | report | Quarterly financial information | information | |
| Financial key figures | Share key figures | Segment key figures | Definitions of key figures |
| Depreciation and amortisation, EUR million | 2008 | 2009 | 2010 | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | 2014 | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Generation | 97 | 93 | 100 | 109 | 114 | 148 | 121 | 118 | 110 | 125 |
| City Solutions | 102 | 100 | 101 | 121 | 163 | |||||
| Heat | 169 | 162 | 187 | 193 | 210 | |||||
| Consumer Solutions | 7 | 16 | ||||||||
| Electricity Sales | 7 | 6 | 2 | 2 | 1 | |||||
| Russia | 67 | 75 | 86 | 108 | 121 | 150 | 147 | 117 | 123 | 142 |
| Other | 10 | 10 | 10 | 7 | 9 | 5 | 8 | 10 | 13 | 18 |
| Distribution | 165 | 164 | 178 | 187 | 209 | 216 | ||||
| Total for continuing operations | 515 | 510 | 563 | 606 | 664 | 621 | 377 | 346 | 373 | 464 |
| Discontinued operations | 150 | 50 | ||||||||
| Total | 526 | 395 | 373 | 464 |
| Share of profit of associates and joint ventures by segment, EUR million | 2008 | 2009 | 2010 | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | 2014 | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Generation | 26 | -35 | -25 | 3 | -12 | 4 | -14 | -111 | -34 | -1 |
| City Solutions | 91 | 88 | 59 | 76 | 80 | |||||
| Heat | 12 | 30 | 31 | 19 | 20 | |||||
| Electricity Sales | 5 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | |||||
| Russia | 19 | 20 | 8 | 30 | 27 | 46 | 35 | 32 | 38 | 31 |
| Other | 48 | -4 | 28 | 23 | -20 | 32 | 37 | 40 | 51 | 38 |
| Distribution | 16 | 10 | 19 | 14 | 8 | 4 | ||||
| Total for continuing operations | 126 | 21 | 62 | 91 | 23 | 178 | 146 | 20 | 131 | 148 |
| Discontinued operations | 3 | 0 | ||||||||
| Total | 149 | 20 | 131 | 148 |
| Capital expenditure by segment, EUR million | 2008 | 2009 | 2010 | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | 2014 | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Generation | 134 | 96 | 97 | 131 | 190 | 179 | 197 | 187 | 196 | 174 |
| City Solutions | 123 | 86 | 105 | 109 | 170 | |||||
| Heat | 408 | 358 | 304 | 297 | 464 | |||||
| Consumer Solutions | 3 | 7 | ||||||||
| Electricity Sales | 3 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 1 | |||||
| Russia | 256 | 215 | 599 | 670 | 568 | 435 | 340 | 285 | 201 | 152 |
| Other | 11 | 4 | 9 | 16 | 11 | 12 | 3 | 6 | 83 | 187 |
| Distribution | 296 | 188 | 213 | 289 | 324 | 255 | ||||
| Total for continuing operations | 1,108 | 862 | 1,222 | 1,408 | 1,558 | 1,005 | 626 | 582 | 591 | 690 |
| Discontinued operations | 147 | 44 | ||||||||
| Total | 774 | 626 | 591 | 690 |
| Operating and | Consolidated | Notes | Key figures | Parent company | Proposal for the use of the profit | Auditor's | Operational key figures | Investor |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| financial review | financial statements | 2008–2017 | financial statements | shown on the balance sheet | report | Quarterly financial information | information | |
| Gross investments in shares by segment, EUR million | 2008 | 2009 | 2010 | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | 2014 | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Generation | 0 | 57 | 25 | 17 | - | 2 | 2 | 16 | 7 | 90 |
| City Solutions | 11 | 37 | 23 | 698 | 386 | |||||
| Heat | 23 | 1 | 1 | 32 | 10 | |||||
| Consumer Solutions | 117 | 486 | ||||||||
| Russia | 1,492 | 3 | - | 24 | - | 0 | 27 | 0 | 0 | 125 |
| Other | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 6 | 2 | 4 | 4 | 22 | 39 |
| Distribution | 0 | 5 | 0 | - | - | 0 | ||||
| Total for continuing operations | 1,516 | 67 | 27 | 74 | 16 | 15 | 69 | 43 | 844 | 1,125 |
| Discontinued operations | 0 | 0 | ||||||||
| Total | 69 | 43 | 844 | 1,125 |
| Gross divestments of shares by segment, EUR million | 2009 | 2010 | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | 2014 | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Generation | 10 | 0 | 3 | 102 | 79 | 67 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| City Solutions | 11 | 446 | 27 | 33 | 0 | ||||
| Heat | 1 | 52 | 203 | 269 | |||||
| Consumer Solutions | 1 | 55 | |||||||
| Electricity Sales | - | - | 16 | 2 | |||||
| Russia | - | 43 | 23 | - | - | 0 | 0 | 127 | 0 |
| Other | 2 | 6 | 0 | 0 | - | 2 | - | 0 | 687 |
| Distribution | 1 | 46 | 323 | 37 | 52 | ||||
| Total for continuing operations | 14 | 147 | 568 | 410 | 142 | 515 | 27 | 161 | 742 |
| Discontinued operations | 2,681 | 6,369 | |||||||
| Total | 3,196 | 6,395 | 161 | 742 |
| Comparable net assets by segment, EUR million | 2008 | 2009 | 2010 | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | 2014 | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Generation | 5,931 | 5,815 | 5,672 | |||||||
| City Solutions | 2,182 | 2,873 | 3,728 | |||||||
| Consumer Solutions | 154 | 638 | ||||||||
| Russia | 2,561 | 3,284 | 3,161 | |||||||
| Other | 258 | 514 | 276 | |||||||
| Total for continuing operations | 10,932 | 12,641 | 13,474 |
Fortum is disclosing Comparable net assets instead of Net assets from 2016 onwards. Net assets until 2015 are disclosed below.
Financial key figures Share key figures Segment key figures Definitions of key figures
| Operating and | Consolidated | Notes | Key figures | Parent company | Proposal for the use of the profit | Auditor's | Operational key figures | Investor |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| financial review | financial statements | 2008–2017 | financial statements | shown on the balance sheet | report | Quarterly financial information | information | |
| Net assets by segment, EUR million | 2008 | 2009 | 2010 | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | 2014 | 2015 1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Generation | 5,331 | 5,494 | 5,806 | 6,247 | 6,389 | 6,355 | 6,001 | 5,913 |
| City Solutions | 2,295 | 2,112 | 2,170 | |||||
| Heat | 3,468 | 3,787 | 4,182 | 4,191 | 4,286 | |||
| Electricity Sales | 188 | 125 | 210 | 11 | 51 | |||
| Russia | 2,205 | 2,260 | 2,817 | 3,273 | 3,848 | 3,846 | 2,597 | 2,561 |
| Other | 796 | 382 | 29 | 208 | 158 | 295 | 496 | 291 |
| Distribution | 3,032 | 3,299 | 3,683 | 3,589 | 3,889 | 3,745 | ||
| Total for continuing operations | 15,020 | 15,347 | 16,727 | 17,519 | 18,621 | 16,537 | 11,206 | 10,934 |
| Net assets related to discontinued operations | 2,615 | - | ||||||
| Total | 13,820 | 10,934 |
1) Fortum is disclosing Comparable net assets instead of Net assets from 2016 onwards.
Financial key figures Share key figures Segment key figures Definitions of key figures
| Comparable return on net assets by segment, % | 2008 | 2009 | 2010 | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | 2014 | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Generation | 28.0 | 26.4 | 22.3 | 19.9 | 18.5 | 13.8 | 14.2 | 9.5 | 6.9 | 8.4 |
| City Solutions | 8.7 | 8.7 | 7.9 | 5.9 | 5.5 | |||||
| Heat | 7.3 | 7.6 | 7.7 | 7.4 | 7.0 | |||||
| Consumer Solutions | 44.3 | 11.7 | ||||||||
| Electricity Sales | -15.3 | 18.6 | 9.3 | 33.5 | 203.1 | |||||
| Russia | -3.8 | 0.0 | 0.7 | 3.5 | 2.7 | 5.2 | 5.6 | 8.2 | 8.0 | 10.1 |
| Distribution 1) | 8.2 | 8.6 | 9.3 | 8.6 | 8.8 | 8.8 | 9.3 |
1) Classified as discontinued operations from 2014 onwards.
| Return on net assets by segment, % | 2008 | 2009 | 2010 | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | 2014 | 2015 1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Generation | 29.6 | 24.5 | 19.5 | 24.6 | 18.7 | 14.5 | 13.6 | -8.5 |
| City Solutions | 9.7 | 19.1 | 7.7 | |||||
| Heat | 8.9 | 7.9 | 8.4 | 9.9 | 8.8 | |||
| Electricity Sales | -14.0 | 28.9 | 38.4 | 4.2 | 152.3 | |||
| Russia | 3.7 | 0.0 | 2.4 | 3.5 | 3.0 | 5.2 | 5.6 | 8.3 |
| Distribution 2) | 8.1 | 8.7 | 9.7 | 13.7 | 9.1 | 9.3 | 73.6 |
1) Fortum is disclosing Comparable net assets instead of Net assets from 2016 onwards.
2) Classified as discontinued operations from 2014 onwards.
| Operating and | Consolidated | Notes | Key figures | Parent company | Proposal for the use of the profit | Auditor's | Operational key figures | Investor |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| financial review | financial statements | 2008–2017 | financial statements | shown on the balance sheet | report | Quarterly financial information | information | |
| Financial key figures | Share key figures | Segment key figures | Definitions of key figures |
| Average number of employees | 2008 | 2009 | 2010 | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | 2014 | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Generation | 3,591 | 2,068 | 1,891 | 1,873 | 1,896 | 1,900 | 1,685 | 1,389 | 1,064 | 1,036 |
| City Solutions | 2,051 | 1,913 | 1,458 | 1,529 | 1,807 | |||||
| Heat | 2,422 | 2,652 | 2,482 | 2,682 | 2,354 | |||||
| Consumer Solutions | 877 | 1,180 | ||||||||
| Electricity Sales | 766 | 629 | 538 | 510 | 515 | |||||
| Russia | 5,566 | 6,170 | 4,555 | 4,436 | 4,301 | 4,245 | 4,196 | 4,180 | 3,814 | 3,710 |
| Other | 510 | 593 | 592 | 607 | 661 | 550 | 536 | 983 | 711 | 774 |
| Distribution | 1,222 | 1,166 | 1,098 | 902 | 873 | 786 | ||||
| Total for continuing operations | 14,077 | 13,278 | 11,156 | 11,010 | 10,600 | 9,532 | 8,329 | 8,009 | 7,994 | 8,507 |
| Discontinued operations | 492 | |||||||||
| Total | 8,821 |
Financial key figures Share key figures Segment key figures Definitions of key figures
| EBITDA (Earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortisation) |
= Operating profit + depreciation and amortisation | Capital expenditure | = Capitalised investments in property, plant and equipment and intangible assets including maintenance, productivity, growth and investments required by legislation including borrowing costs capitalised during the construction period. Maintenance |
|---|---|---|---|
| Comparable EBITDA | = EBITDA - items affecting comparability - net release of CSA provision |
investments expand the lifetime of an existing asset, maintain usage/availability and/or maintains reliability. Productivity investments improve productivity in an existing asset. Growth |
|
| Items affecting comparability | = Impairment charges + capital gains and other + changes in fair values of derivatives hedging future cash flow + nuclear fund adjustment |
investments' purpose is to build new assets and/or to increase customer base within existing businesses. Legislation investments are done at a certain point of time due to legal requirements. |
|
| Comparable operating profit | = Operating profit - items affecting comparability | Gross investments in shares | = Investments in subsidiary shares, shares in associated companies and other shares in available-for-sale financial assets. Investments in subsidiary shares are net of cash and grossed |
| Impairment charges | = Impairment charges and related provisions (mainly dismantling) |
with interest-bearing liabilities in the acquired company. | |
| Return on shareholders' equity, | = Profit for the year x 100 |
||
| Capital gains and other | = Capital gains, transaction costs from acquisitions and other | % | Total equity average |
| Changes in fair values of derivatives hedging future cash flow |
= Effects from financial derivatives hedging future cash-flows where hedge accounting is not applied according to IAS 39. |
Return on capital employed, % | = Profit before taxes + interest and other financial expenses x 100 Capital employed average |
| Nuclear fund adjustment | = Effects from the accounting of Fortum's part of the Finnish Nuclear Waste Fund where the asset in the balance sheet cannot exceed the related liabilities according to IFRIC interpretation 5. |
Comparable return on net assets, % |
= Comparable operating profit + share of profit (loss) in associated companies and joint ventures + adjustment for Share of profit of associated companies and joint ventures x 100 Comparable net assets average |
| Adjustment for Share of profit of associated companies and joint |
= Adjustment for IAS 39 effects, major sales gains and impairment charges |
Capital employed | = Total assets - non-interest bearing liabilities - deferred tax liabilities - provisions |
| ventures Funds from operations (FFO) |
= Net cash from operating activities before change in working capital |
Comparable net assets | = Non-interest bearing assets + interest-bearing assets related to the Nuclear Waste Fund - non-interest bearing liabilities - provisions (non-interest bearing assets and liabilities do not include finance related items, tax and deferred tax and assets and liabilities from fair valuations of derivatives used for hedging future cash flows) |
| Operating and financial review |
Consolidated financial statements |
Notes | Key figures 2008–2017 |
Parent company financial statements |
Proposal for the use of the profit shown on the balance sheet |
Auditor's report |
Operational key figures Quarterly financial information |
Investor information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Financial key figures | Share key figures | Segment key figures | Definitions of key figures | |||||
| Interest-bearing net debt | = Interest-bearing liabilities - liquid funds | Average share price | = Amount traded in euros during the period Number of shares traded during the period |
|||||
| Gearing, % | = Interest-bearing net debt Total equity |
x 100 | Market capitalisation | end of the period | = Number of shares at the end of the period x share price at the | |||
| Equity-to-assets ratio, % | = Total equity including non-controlling interests Total assets |
x 100 | Trading volumes | = Number of shares traded during the period in relation to the weighted average number of shares during the period |
||||
| Comparable net debt/EBITDA | = Interest-bearing net debt Comparable EBITDA |
Effective income tax rate | = Income tax expense | Profit before income tax | ||||
| Interest coverage | = Operating profit Net interest expenses |
Comparable effective income tax rate |
= Income tax expense - effects from tax rate changes and major one time income tax effects |
|||||
| Interest coverage including capitalised borrowing costs |
= Operating profit | Net interest expenses - capitalised borrowing costs | gains and losses | Profit before income tax decreased by profits from associated companies and joint ventures as well as tax exempt capital |
||||
| Average number of employees | Based on monthly average for the whole period | Taxes borne | = Taxes that a company is obliged to pay to a government, directly or indirectly, on that company's own behalf in respect |
|||||
| Earnings per share (EPS) | = Profit for the period - non-controlling interests | Average number of shares during the period | of an accounting period. Taxes borne include corporate income taxes (excluding deferred taxes), production taxes, employment taxes, taxes on property and cost of indirect |
|||||
| Cash flow per share | = Net cash from operating activities | Average number of shares during the period | taxes. Production taxes include also taxes paid through electricity purchased from associated companies. |
|||||
| Equity per share | = Shareholders' equity | Number of shares at the end of the period | Total tax rate | = Taxes borne profit |
Profit before income tax increased by taxes borne in operating | |||
| Payout ratio, % | = Dividend per share Earnings per share |
x 100 | Comparable total tax rate | = Taxes borne | Profit before income tax increased by taxes borne in operating profit and decreased by profits from associated companies |
|||
| Dividend yield, % | = Dividend per share Share price at the end of the period |
x 100 | Weighted average applicable | and joint ventures and by tax exempt capital gains or losses = Sum of the proportionately weighted share of profits before |
||||
| Price/earnings (P/E) ratio | = Share price at the end of the period Earnings per share |
income tax rate | taxes of each group operating country multiplied with an applicable nominal tax rate of the respective countries. |
| EUR million | Note | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sales | 2 | 73 | 70 |
| Other income | 3 | 6 | 8 |
| Employee costs | 4 | -32 | -31 |
| Depreciation, amortisation and write-downs | 8 | -6 | -6 |
| Other expenses | -79 | -67 | |
| Operating profit | -38 | -26 | |
| Financial income and expenses | 6 | 823 | 675 |
| Profit before appropriations | 785 | 649 | |
| Group contributions 1) | 157 | 145 | |
| Profit before income tax | 943 | 794 | |
| Income tax expense | 7 | -10 | -14 |
| Profit for the period | 933 | 780 |
1) Taxable profits transferred from Finnish subsidiaries.
| EUR million | Note | 31 Dec 2017 | 31 Dec 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|
| ASSETS | |||
| Non-current assets | |||
| Intangible assets | 8 | 10 | 9 |
| Property, plant and equipment | 8 | 21 | 7 |
| Shares in Group companies | 8 | 16,725 | 16,379 |
| Participations in associated companies | 8 | 2 | 6 |
| Interest-bearing receivables from Group | |||
| companies | 8 | 212 | 717 |
| Interest-bearing receivables from associated | |||
| companies | 8 | 15 | 15 |
| Other non-current assets | 8 | 0 | 0 |
| Derivative financial instruments | 13, 14 | 242 | 344 |
| Deferred tax assets | 0 | 6 | |
| Total non-current assets | 17,226 | 17,484 | |
| Current assets | |||
| Other current receivables from Group companies | 9 | 173 | 155 |
| Other current receivables from associated | |||
| companies | 9 | 0 | 0 |
| Derivative financial instruments | 13, 14 | 132 | 127 |
| Other current receivables | 9 | 14 | 45 |
| EUR million | Note | 31 Dec 2017 | 31 Dec 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Deposits and securities (maturity over three months) | 714 | 3,473 | |
| Cash and cash equivalents | 2,792 | 1,463 | |
| Liquid funds | 3,506 | 4,935 | |
| Total current assets | 3,825 | 5,263 | |
| Total assets | 21,052 | 22,746 | |
| EQUITY | |||
| Shareholders' equity | 10 | ||
| Share capital | 3,046 | 3,046 | |
| Share premium | 2,822 | 2,822 | |
| Hedging reserve | -11 | -23 | |
| Retained earnings | 4,249 | 4,447 | |
| Profit for the period | 933 | 780 | |
| Total shareholders' equity | 11,038 | 11,072 | |
| Provisions for liabilities and charges | 0 | 1 | |
| LIABILITIES | |||
| Non-current liabilities | |||
| External interest-bearing liabilities | 11, 13, 14 | 3,448 | 4,018 |
| Interest-bearing liabilities to Group companies | 3,290 | 2,323 | |
| Interest-bearing liabilities to associated companies | 11 | 285 | 273 |
| Derivative financial instruments | 13, 14 | 94 | 124 |
| Other non-current liabilities | 44 | 61 | |
| Total non-current liabilities | 7,160 | 6,799 | |
| Current liabilities | |||
| External interest-bearing liabilities | 11 | 657 | 617 |
| Trade and other payables to Group companies | 12 | 1,991 | 4,002 |
| Trade and other payables to associated companies | 12 | 4 | 6 |
| Derivative financial instruments | 13, 14 | 102 | 149 |
| Trade and other payables | 12 | 100 | 101 |
| Total current liabilities | 2,854 | 4,875 | |
| Total liabilities | 10,014 | 11,674 | |
| Total equity and liabilities | 21,052 | 22,746 |
| EUR million | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|
| Cash flow from operating activities | ||
| Profit for the period | 933 | 780 |
| Adjustments: | ||
| Income tax expense | 10 | 14 |
| Group contributions | -157 | -145 |
| Finance costs - net | -823 | -675 |
| Depreciations, amortisation and write-downs | 6 | 6 |
| Operating profit before depreciations (EBITDA) | -32 | -20 |
| Non-cash flow items and divesting activities | 0 | 8 |
| Interest and other financial income | 6 | 21 |
| Interest and other financial expenses paid | -101 | -88 |
| Dividend income | 944 | 756 |
| Group contribution received | 145 | 447 |
| Realised foreign exchange gains and losses | -28 | 113 |
| Income taxes paid | 23 | -46 |
| Funds from operations | 957 | 1,191 |
| Other short-term receivables increase(-)/decrease(+) | -12 | -1 |
| Other short-term payables increase(+)/decrease(-) | 12 | -6 |
| Change in working capital | 0 | -7 |
| Net cash from operating activities | 958 | 1,184 |
| Cash flow from investing activities | ||
| Capital expenditures | -15 | -5 |
| Acquisition of shares and capital contributions in subsidiaries | -380 | -583 |
| Acquisition of other shares | 0 | 0 |
| Proceeds from sales of fixed assets | 0 | 2 |
| Change in interest-bearing receivables and other non-current assets | 504 | -5 |
| Net cash used in investing activities | 109 | -591 |
| Cash flow before financing activities | 1,067 | 593 |
| EUR million | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|
| Cash flow from financing activities | ||
| Proceeds from long-term liabilities | 35 | 27 |
| Payment of long-term liabilities | -482 | -811 |
| Change in cashpool liabilities | 967 | -3,940 |
| Change in short-term liabilities | -2,038 | 2,398 |
| Dividends paid | -977 | -976 |
| Net cash used in financing activities | -2,496 | -3,302 |
| Net increase(+)/decrease(-) in liquid funds | -1,429 | -2,710 |
| Liquid funds at the beginning of the period | 4,935 | 7,645 |
| Liquid funds at the end of the period | 3,506 | 4,935 |
The financial statements of Fortum Oyj are prepared in accordance with Finnish Accounting Standards (FAS).
Sales include sales revenue from actual operations and exchange rate differences on trade receivables, less discounts and indirect taxes such as value added tax.
Other income includes gains on the sales of property, plant and equipment and shareholdings, as well as all other operating income not related to the sales of products or services, such as rents.
Transactions denominated in foreign currencies have been valued using the exchange rate at the date of the transaction. Receivables and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies outstanding on the balance sheet date have been valued using the exchange rate quoted on the balance sheet date. Exchange rate differences have been entered in the financial net in the income statement.
Fortum Oyj enters into derivative contracts mainly for hedging foreign exchange and interest rate exposures in Fortum Group.
Accounting principles of financial derivatives, see Note 3 Financial risk management, Note 14 Financial assets and liabilities by categories and Note 15 Financial assets and liabilities by fair value hierarchy in the Consolidated financial statements.
Income taxes presented in the income statement consist of accrued taxes for the financial year and tax adjustments for prior years.
The balance sheet value of shares in group companies consists of historical costs less write-downs. If the estimated future cash flows generated by a non-current asset are expected to be permanently lower than the balance of the carrying amount, an adjustment to the value must be made to write-down the difference as an expense. If the basis for the write-down can no longer be justified at the balance sheet date, it must be reversed.
The balance sheet value of property, plant and equipment consists of historical costs less depreciation and possible impairments. Property, plant and equipment are depreciated using straight-line depreciation based on the expected useful life of the asset.
The depreciation is based on the following expected useful lives:
| Buildings and structures | 15–40 years |
|---|---|
| Machinery and equipment | 3–15 years |
| Other intangible assets | 5–10 years |
Statutory pension obligations are covered through a compulsory pension insurance policy or Group's own pension fund. Costs for pension fund are recorded in the income statement based on contributions paid pursuant to the Finnish pension laws and regulations.
Costs related to the Fortum long-term incentive plans are accrued over the earnings period and the related liability is booked to the balance sheet.
Foreseeable future expenses and losses that have no corresponding revenue to which Fortum is committed or obliged to settle, and whose monetary value can be reasonably assessed, are entered as expenses in the income statement and included as provisions in the balance sheet.
Information presented in the notes is given separately for Fortum Group companies and for associated companies of the Group.
| EUR million | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|
| Finland | 46 | 43 |
| Other countries | 27 | 28 |
| Total | 73 | 70 |
| EUR million | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|
| Rental and other income | 6 | 8 |
| Total | 6 | 8 |
| EUR million | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|
| Personnel expenses | ||
| Wages, salaries and remunerations | 25 | 24 |
| Indirect employee costs | ||
| Pension costs | 5 | 5 |
| Other indirect employee costs | 1 | 1 |
| Other personnel expenses | 1 | 1 |
| Total | 32 | 31 |
| 2017 | 2016 | |
|---|---|---|
| EUR thousand | Pekka Lundmark, President and CEO |
Pekka Lundmark, President and CEO |
| Compensation for the President and CEO | ||
| Salaries and fringe benefits | 998 | 982 |
| Performance bonuses 1) | 187 | 248 |
| Share-based incentives 1) | 334 | 433 |
| Pensions (statutory) | 231 | 209 |
| Pensions (voluntary) | 229 | 356 |
| Social security expenses | 41 | 73 |
| Total | 2,019 | 2,299 |
1) Based on estimated amounts.
| EUR thousand | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|
| Compensation for the Board of Directors | 492 | 518 |
The compensation above is presented on accrual basis. Paid salaries and remunerations for the President and CEO Pekka Lundmark were EUR 1,405 thousand (2016: 1,012).
For the President and CEO Pekka Lundmark the retirement age of old-age pension is 63. The pension obligations are covered through insurance company.
Board members are not in an employment relationship or service contract with Fortum, and they are not given the opportunity to participate in Fortum's STI or LTI programme, nor does Fortum have a pension plan that they can opt to take part in. The compensation of the board members is not tied to the sustainability performance of the Group.
See Note 10 Employee benefits and Note 30 Pension obligations in the Consolidated financial statements.
| 2017 | 2016 | |
|---|---|---|
| Average number of employees | 258 | 272 |
| EUR thousand | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|
| Audit fees | 295 | 188 |
| Audit related assignments | 64 | 61 |
| Tax assignments | 0 | 0 |
| Other assignments | 81 | 0 |
| Total | 440 | 249 |
Deloitte Oy is the appointed auditor until the next Annual General Meeting, to be held in 2018. Audit fees include fees for the audit of the consolidated financial statements, review of the interim reports as well as the fees for the audit of Fortum Oyj. Audit related assignments include fees for assurance of sustainability reporting and other assurance and associated services related to the audit. Tax assignments include fees for tax advice services. Other assignments consist of advisory services.
| EUR million | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend income from group companies | 944 | 756 |
| Dividend income from associated companies and other companies |
0 | 0 |
| Interest and other financial income from group companies | 12 | 8 |
| Write-downs of participations in group companies | -35 | -4 |
| Write-downs of participations in associated companies | -3 | - |
| Write-downs on loan receivables | -1 | - |
| Interest and other financial income | 0 | 3 |
| Exchange rate differences | 22 | 41 |
| Changes in fair values of derivatives | -16 | -11 |
| Interest and other financial expenses to group companies | -1 | 0 |
| Interest and other financial expenses | -99 | -116 |
| Total | 823 | 675 |
| Interest income | 13 | 11 |
| Interest expenses | -81 | -113 |
| Interest net | -68 | -102 |
Write-downs of participations in group companies are related to shares in Fortum Heat and Gas Oy due to received dividend payments.
| EUR million | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|
| Taxes on regular business operations | -21 | -15 |
| Taxes on group contributions | 31 | 29 |
| Total | 10 | 14 |
| Current taxes for the period | 6 | 9 |
| Current taxes for prior periods | 0 | 7 |
| Changes in deferred tax | 3 | -1 |
| Total | 10 | 14 |
| EUR million | Intangible assets total |
|---|---|
| Cost 1 January 2017 | 47 |
| Additions | 0 |
| Disposals | -8 |
| Cost 31 December 2017 | 39 |
| Accumulated depreciation 1 January 2017 | 39 |
| Disposals | -13 |
| Depreciation for the period | 4 |
| Accumulated depreciation 31 December 2017 | 30 |
| Carrying amount 31 December 2017 | 10 |
| Carrying amount 31 December 2016 | 9 |
| Buildings and | Machinery and | Advances paid and construction in |
||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EUR million | structures | equipment | progress | Total |
| Cost 1 January 2017 | 1 | 9 | 4 | 14 |
| Additions and transfers between | ||||
| categories | 1 | 14 | 15 | |
| Disposals | -2 | 0 | -2 | |
| Cost 31 December 2017 | 1 | 7 | 18 | 27 |
| Accumulated depreciation | ||||
| 1 January 2017 | 1 | 6 | 0 | 7 |
| Disposals | -2 | -2 | ||
| Depreciation for the period | 0 | 1 | 1 | |
| Accumulated depreciation | ||||
| 31 December 2017 | 1 | 5 | 0 | 6 |
| Carrying amount 31 December 2017 | 0 | 2 | 18 | 21 |
| Carrying amount 31 December 2016 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 7 |
| EUR million | Shares in Group companies |
Participation in associated companies |
Receivables from Group companies |
Receivables from associated companies |
Other non-current assets |
Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 January 2017 | 17,467 | 6 | 717 | 15 | 8 | 18,213 |
| Additions 1) | 380 | 1 | 0 | 382 | ||
| Disposals | -506 | -506 | ||||
| 31 December 2017 | 17,847 | 6 | 212 | 16 | 8 | 18,089 |
| Accumulated write-downs 1 January 2017 |
-1,088 | 0 | 0 | 0 | -7 | -1,095 |
| Impairment charges | -35 | -3 | -1 | -1 | -40 | |
| Accumulated write-downs 31 December 2017 2) |
-1,123 | -3 | 0 | -1 | -8 | -1,135 |
| Carrying amount 31 December 2017 |
16,725 | 2 | 212 | 15 | 0 | 16,954 |
1) Additions regarding shares comprise acquisitions of shares and capital contributions and reclassification between other noncurrent assets and shares in Group companies.
2) Write-downs of participations in group companies are related to shares in Fortum Heat and Gas Oy due to received dividend payments.
| Share | Share | Hedging | Retained | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EUR million | capital | premium | reserve | earnings | Total |
| Total equity 31 December 2016 | 3,046 | 2,822 | -23 | 5,226 | 11,072 |
| Cash dividend | -977 | -977 | |||
| Change in hedging reserve | 11 | 11 | |||
| Profit for the period | 933 | 933 | |||
| Total equity 31 December 2017 | 3,046 | 2,822 | -11 | 5,182 | 11,038 |
| Total equity 31 December 2015 | 3,046 | 2,822 | -31 | 5,424 | 11,261 |
| Cash dividend | -977 | -977 | |||
| Change in hedging reserve | 8 | 8 | |||
| Profit for the period | 780 | 780 | |||
| Total equity 31 December 2016 | 3,046 | 2,822 | -23 | 5,226 | 11,072 |
| EUR million | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|
| Distributable funds | ||
| Retained earnings 31 December | 5,182 | 5,226 |
| Hedging reserve | -11 | -23 |
| Distributable funds 31 December | 5,170 | 5,204 |
| EUR million | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|
| Other current receivables from group companies | ||
| Trade receivables | 9 | 10 |
| Group contribution and other receivables | 157 | 145 |
| Accrued income and prepaid expenses | 6 | 0 |
| Total | 173 | 155 |
| Other current receivables from associated companies | ||
| Accrued income and prepaid expenses | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 0 | 0 |
| Other current receivables | ||
| Trade receivables | 0 | 0 |
| Other receivables | 0 | 0 |
| Accrued income and prepaid expenses | 14 | 44 |
| Total | 14 | 45 |
See Note 3.5 Liquidity and refinancing risk in the Consolidated financial statement
| EUR million | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|
| External interest-bearing liabilities 1) | ||
| Bonds | 2,521 | 2,986 |
| Loans from financial institutions | 82 | 210 |
| Other long-term interest-bearing debt | 844 | 822 |
| Total long-term interest-bearing debt | 3,448 | 4,018 |
| Current portion of long-term bonds | 422 | 343 |
| Current portion of loans from financial institutions | 122 | 139 |
| Other short-term interest-bearing debt | 114 | 135 |
| Total short-term interest-bearing debt | 657 | 617 |
| Total external interest-bearing debt | 4,105 | 4,635 |
| EUR million | 2017 |
|---|---|
| 2018 | 657 |
| 2019 | 792 |
| 2020 | 28 |
| 2021 | 528 |
| 2022 | 1,057 |
| 2023 and later | 1,042 |
| Total | 4,105 |
See Note 3.5 Liquidity and refinancing risk and Note 26 Interest-bearing liabilities in the Consolidated financial statements.
| EUR million | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|
| External interest-bearing liabilities due after five years 1) | ||
| Bonds | 198 | 1,282 |
| Other long-term liabilities | 844 | 821 |
| Total | 1,042 | 2,102 |
| EUR million | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|
| Other interest-bearing liabilities due after five years | ||
| Interest-bearing liabilities to associated companies | 285 | 273 |
| Total | 285 | 273 |
1) Does not include liabilities to group and associated companies.
Non-discounted cash flows of interest-bearing liabilities and their maturities, see Note 13 Financial derivatives.
| EUR million | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|
| Trade and other payables to group companies | ||
| Trade payables | 3 | 0 |
| Deposits from group companies and other liabities | 1,987 | 4,002 |
| Accruals and deferred income | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 1,991 | 4,002 |
| Trade and other payables to associated companies | ||
| Accruals and deferred income | 4 | 6 |
| Total | 4 | 6 |
| Trade and other payables | ||
| Trade payables | 21 | 6 |
| Other liabilities | 2 | 4 |
| Accruals and deferred income | 76 | 91 |
| Total | 100 | 101 |
| Notional amount | Fair value | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Remaining lifetimes | |||||||
| Under 1 | 1–5 | Over | |||||
| EUR million | year | years | 5 years | Total | Positive Negative | Net | |
| Forward foreign exchange | |||||||
| contracts | 7,790 | 517 | 8,307 | 77 | 104 | -27 | |
| Interest rate swaps | 305 | 3,421 | 102 | 3,827 | 205 | 90 | 115 |
| Interest rate and currency | |||||||
| swaps | 311 | 580 | 892 | 92 | 3 | 89 | |
| Total | 8,406 | 4,518 | 102 | 13,025 | 373 | 196 | 177 |
| Of which long-term | 242 | 94 | 148 | ||||
| Short-term | 132 | 102 | 29 |
| Notional amount | Fair value | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Under 1 | Remaining lifetimes 1–5 |
Over | |||||
| EUR million | year | years | 5 years | Total | Positive Negative | Net | |
| Forward foreign exchange | |||||||
| contracts | 6,369 | 252 | 6,621 | 131 | 141 | -11 | |
| Interest rate swaps | 259 | 2,718 | 1,105 | 4,081 | 269 | 127 | 142 |
| Interest rate and currency | |||||||
| swaps | 29 | 798 | 827 | 71 | 5 | 66 | |
| Total | 6,657 | 3,767 | 1,105 | 11,529 | 471 | 273 | 198 |
| Of which long-term | 344 | 124 | 220 | ||||
| Short-term | 127 | 149 | -22 |
Amounts disclosed below are non-discounted expected cash flows (future interest payments and amortisations) of interest-bearing liabilities and interest rate and currency derivatives.
| 2017 2016 |
||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EUR million | Under 1 year |
1–5 years |
Over 5 years |
Total | Under 1 year |
1–5 years |
Over 5 years |
Total |
| Interest-bearing liabilities |
2,752 | 2,613 | 1,509 | 6,875 | 6,047 | 2,239 | 2,491 | 10,777 |
| Interest rate and currency derivates liabilities |
8,132 | 1,256 | 4 | 9,392 | 6,669 | 1,234 | 20 | 7,924 |
| Interest rate and currency derivates receivables |
-8,191 | -1,341 | -1 | -9,534 | -6,650 | -1,404 | -27 | -8,080 |
| Total | 2,693 | 2,529 | 1,511 | 6,733 | 6,067 | 2,069 | 2,485 | 10,621 |
Interest-bearing liabilities include loans from the State Nuclear Waste Management Fund and Teollisuuden Voima Oyj of EUR 1,129 million (2016: 1,094). These loans are renewed yearly and the related interest payments are calculated for ten years in the table above.
Fair value measurements are classified using a fair value hierarchy i.e. Level 1, Level 2 and Level 3 that reflects the significance of the inputs used in making the measurements. For further information look accounting principles in Fortum consolidated accounts Note 15 Financial assets and liabilities by fair value hierarchy.
| Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Total | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EUR million | 2017 | 2016 | 2017 | 2016 | 2017 | 2016 | 2017 | 2016 |
| In non-current assets | ||||||||
| Derivative financial instruments | ||||||||
| Interest rate and currency derivatives | ||||||||
| Hedge accounting | 154 | 240 | 154 | 240 | ||||
| Non-hedge accounting | 87 | 103 | 87 | 103 | ||||
| In current assets | ||||||||
| Derivative financial instruments | ||||||||
| Interest rate and currency derivatives | ||||||||
| Hedge accounting | 88 | 17 | 88 | 17 | ||||
| Non-hedge accounting | 44 | 110 | 44 | 110 | ||||
| Total | - | - | 373 | 471 | - | - | 373 | 471 |
| Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Total | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EUR million | 2017 | 2016 | 2017 | 2016 | 2017 | 2016 | 2017 | 2016 |
| In non-current liabilities | ||||||||
| Interest-bearing liabilities 1) | 1,037 1,280 | 1,037 1,280 | ||||||
| Derivative financial instruments | ||||||||
| Interest rate and currency derivatives | ||||||||
| Hedge accounting | 47 | 72 | 47 | 72 | ||||
| Non-hedge accounting | 47 | 52 | 47 | 52 | ||||
| In current liabilities | ||||||||
| Derivative financial instruments | ||||||||
| Interest rate and currency derivatives | ||||||||
| Hedge accounting | 14 | 12 | 14 | 12 | ||||
| Non-hedge accounting | 88 | 137 | 88 | 137 | ||||
| Total | - | - 1,233 1,554 | - | - 1,233 1,554 |
1) Fair valued part of bond in the fair value hedge relationship.
Operating and
Net fair value amount of interest rate and currency derivatives is EUR 177 million (2016: 198), including assets EUR 373 million (2016: 471) and liabilities EUR 196 million (2016: 273). Fortum Corporation has cash collaterals based on Credit Support Annex agreements with some counterparties. At the end of December 2017 Fortum Corporation had received EUR 113 million (2016: 135) from Credit Support Annex agreements. The received cash has been booked as a short-term interest-bearing liability.
| EUR million | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|
| On own behalf | ||
| Other contingent liabilities | 2 | 2 |
| On behalf of group companies | ||
| Guarantees | 221 | 135 |
| On behalf of associated companies | ||
| Guarantees on behalf of Swedish associated companies | 548 | 565 |
| Contingent liabilities total | 771 | 702 |
| EUR million | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|
| Operating lease commitments | ||
| Due within a year | 7 | 2 |
| Due after one year and within five years | 28 | 2 |
| Due after 5 years | 18 | - |
| Total | 54 | 5 |
Increase in operating lease commitments arises mainly from the lease agreement relating to the new head office in Espoo.
See Note 39 Related party transactions in the Consolidated financial statements.
| No. of shares units | Holding % | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Investments in group companies | |||
| Fortum Waste Solutions Oy | Finland | 3,520,800 | 100.00 |
| Fortum Asiakaspalvelu Oy | Finland | 10,010 | 100.00 |
| Fortum Heat and Gas Oy | Finland | 2,000,000 | 100.00 |
| Fortum Markets Oy | Finland | 24,039 | 100.00 |
| Fortum Norm Oy | Finland | 250 | 100.00 |
| Fortum Power and Heat Oy | Finland | 91,197,543 | 100.00 |
| Fortum Real Estate Oy | Finland | 2,000,000 | 100.00 |
| Fortum Project Finance N.V. | Belgium | 727,820 | 99.99 |
| Fortum India Private Ltd | India | 1 | 0.10 |
| Fortum Finance Ireland Designated | |||
| Activity Company | Ireland | 25,000 | 100.00 |
| Fortum Investment S.A.R.L. | Luxembourg | 990 | 0.45 |
| Fortum Sweden AB | Sweden | 1,000 | 100.00 |
| Fortum Holding B.V. | The Netherlands | 61,062 | 100.00 |
| Investments in associated companies | |||
| AW-Energy Oy | Finland | 806 | 13.60 |
| Wello Oy | Finland | 1,508 | 16.18 |
| Other holdings | |||
| Clic Innovation Oy | Finland | 100 | 3.80 |
| East Office of Finnish Industries Oy | Finland | 1 | 5.88 |
| Prototype Carbon Fund | USA | N/A |
The distributable funds of Fortum Oyj as at 31 December 2017 amounted to EUR 5,170,240,554.04 including the profit of the financial period 2017 of EUR 932,525,770.24. The company's liquidity is good and the dividend proposed by the Board of Directors will not compromise the company's liquidity.
The Board of Directors proposes to the Annual General Meeting that a dividend of EUR 1.10 per share be paid for 2017.
Based on the number of registered shares as at 1 February 2018 the total amount of dividend proposed to be paid is EUR 977,203,749.50. The Board of Directors proposes, that the remaining part of the distributable funds be retained in the shareholders' equity.
Signatures for the operating and financial review and the financial statements
Espoo, 1 February 2018
Sari Baldauf
Kim Ignatius
Matti Lievonen
Heinz-Werner Binzel Veli-Matti Reinikkala
Eva Hamilton
Anja McAlister
Pekka Lundmark President and CEO
We have audited the financial statements of Fortum Oyj (business identity code 1463611-4) for the year ended 31 December, 2017. The financial statements comprise the consolidated balance sheet, consolidated income statement, consolidated statement of comprehensive income, consolidated statement of changes in total equity, consolidated cash flow statement and notes to the consolidated financial statements, including a summary of significant accounting policies, as well as the parent company's balance sheet, income statement, cash flow statement and notes to the financial statements.
Our opinion is consistent with the additional report submitted to the Audit Committee.
We conducted our audit in accordance with good auditing practice in Finland. Our responsibilities under good auditing practice are further described in the Auditor's Responsibilities for the Audit of Financial Statements section of our report.
We are independent of the parent company and of the group companies in accordance with the ethical requirements that are applicable in Finland and are relevant to our audit, and we have fulfilled our other ethical responsibilities in accordance with these requirements.
In our best knowledge and understanding, the non-audit services that we have provided to the parent company and group companies are in compliance with laws and regulations applicable in Finland regarding these services, and we have not provided any prohibited non-audit services referred to in Article 5(1) of regulation (EU) 537/2014. The non-audit services that we have provided have been disclosed in note 8 to the consolidated financial statements.
We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our opinion.
Key audit matters are those matters that, in our professional judgment, were of most significance in our audit of the financial statements of the current period. These matters were addressed in the context of our audit of the financial statements as a whole, and in forming our opinion thereon, and we do not provide a separate opinion on these matters.
We have also addressed the risk of management override of internal controls. This includes consideration of whether there was evidence of management bias that represented a risk of material misstatement due to fraud.
Valuation of fixed assets and goodwill Refer to Notes 2, 16 and 17.
Associated companies and joint ventures Refer to Notes 2, 18 and 36.
Nuclear related assets and liabilities Refer to Notes 2 and 28.
The Board of Directors and the President and CEO are responsible for the preparation of consolidated financial statements that give a true and fair view in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) as adopted by the EU, and of financial statements that give a true and fair view in accordance with the laws and regulations governing the preparation of financial statements in Finland and comply with statutory requirements. The Board of Directors and the President and CEO are also responsible for such internal control as they determine is necessary to enable the preparation of financial statements that are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error.
In preparing the financial statements, the Board of Directors and the President and CEO are responsible for assessing the parent company's and the group's ability to continue as going concern, disclosing, as applicable, matters relating to going concern and using the going concern basis of accounting. The financial statements are prepared using the going concern basis of accounting unless there is an intention to liquidate the parent company or the group or cease operations, or there is no realistic alternative but to do so.
Our objectives are to obtain reasonable assurance on whether the financial statements as a whole are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error, and to issue an auditor's report that includes our opinion. Reasonable assurance is a high level of assurance, but is not a guarantee that an audit conducted in accordance with good auditing practice will always detect a material misstatement when it exists. Misstatements can arise from fraud or error and are considered material if, individually or in aggregate, they could reasonably be expected to influence the economic decisions of users taken on the basis of the financial statements.
As part of an audit in accordance with good auditing practice, we exercise professional judgment and maintain professional scepticism throughout the audit. We also:
Refer to Notes 2, 12, 27 and 36.
Key figures 2008–2017
We communicate with those charged with governance regarding, among other matters, the planned scope and timing of the audit and significant audit findings, including any significant deficiencies in internal control that we identify during our audit.
We also provide those charged with governance with a statement that we have complied with relevant ethical requirements regarding independence, and communicate with them all relationships and other matters that may reasonably be thought to bear on our independence, and where applicable, related safeguards.
From the matters communicated with those charged with governance, we determine those matters that were of most significance in the audit of the financial statements of the current period and are therefore the key audit matters. We describe these matters in our auditor's report unless law or regulation precludes public disclosure about the matter or when, in extremely rare circumstances, we determine that a matter should not be communicated in our report because the adverse consequences of doing so would reasonably be expected to outweigh the public interest benefits of such communication.
We were first appointed as auditors by the Annual General Meeting on 16.3.2006, and our appointment represents a total period of uninterrupted engagement of 11 years.
The Board of Directors and the President and CEO are responsible for the other information. The other information comprises the Operational and Financial Review and the information included in the Financials, but does not include the financial statements and our auditor's report thereon. We have obtained the Operating and Financial Review prior to the date of this auditor's report, and the Financials is expected to be made available to us after that date.
Our opinion on the financial statements does not cover the other information.
In connection with our audit of the financial statements, our responsibility is to read the other information identified above and, in doing so, consider whether the other information is materially inconsistent with the financial statements or our knowledge obtained in the audit, or otherwise appears to be materially misstated. With respect to Operating and Financial Review, our responsibility also includes considering whether the Operating and Financial Review has been prepared in accordance with the applicable laws and regulations.
In our opinion, the information in the Operating and Financial Review is consistent with the information in the financial statements and the Operating and Financial Review has been prepared in accordance with the applicable laws and regulations.
If, based on the work we have performed on the other information that we obtained prior the date of this auditor's report, we conclude that there is a material misstatement of this information, we are required to report that fact. We have nothing to report in this regard.
We support that the financial statements should be adopted. The proposal by the Board of Directors regarding the use of the profit shown on the balance sheet is in compliance with the Limited Liability Companies Act. We support that the Board of Directors of the parent company and the President and CEO should be discharged from liability for the financial period audited by us.
Espoo, 1 February 2018
Deloitte Oy Audit Firm
Reeta Virolainen Authorised Public Accountant (KHT)
2008–2017
Operational key figures Quarterly financial information
Note: Operational key figures are unaudited.
Information in the tables and graphs presented for year 2012 or earlier is not restated due to the adoption of IFRS 10 and IFRS 11. Adoption of standards influences treatment of Fortum's holding in AB Fortum Värme samägt med Stockholms stad (Fortum Värme) in the the consolidated financial statements. From 1 January 2014 onwards Fortum Värme is treated as a joint venture and thus consolidated with equity method. Before the change the company was consolidated as a subsidiary with 50% minority interest.
Total 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100
| Power generation capacity by segment, MW | 2008 | 2009 | 2010 | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | 2014 | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Generation | 9,575 | 9,709 | 9,728 | 9,752 | 9,702 | 9,475 | 9,063 | 8,046 | 8,039 | 7,862 |
| Heat | 1,213 | 1,446 | 1,600 | 1,670 | 1,569 | |||||
| City Solutions | 793 | 803 | 743 | 760 | 775 | |||||
| Russia | 2,785 | 2,785 | 2,785 | 3,404 | 3,404 | 4,250 | 4,758 | 4,903 | 4,482 | 4,794 |
| Other | 53 | 292 | ||||||||
| Total | 13,573 | 13,940 | 14,113 | 14,826 | 14,675 | 14,518 | 14,624 | 13,692 | 13,334 | 13,722 |
| Heat production capacity by segment, MW | 2008 | 2009 | 2010 | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | 2014 | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Generation | 250 | 250 | 250 | 250 | 250 | 250 | 0 | |||
| Heat | 10,218 | 10,284 | 10,448 | 10,375 | 8,785 | |||||
| City Solutions | 4,317 | 3,936 | 3,915 | 3,818 | 4,671 | |||||
| Russia | 13,796 | 13,796 | 13,796 | 14,107 | 13,396 | 13,466 | 13,466 | 12,696 | 9,920 | 10,094 |
| Total | 24,264 | 24,330 | 24,494 | 24,732 | 22,431 | 18,033 | 17,402 | 16,611 | 13,738 | 14,765 |
| Finland | Sweden | Russia | Poland | Other | Total | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fortum's power generation capacity by type and area, MW | 2017 | 2016 | 2017 | 2016 | 2017 | 2016 | 2017 | 2016 | 2017 | 2016 | 2017 | 2016 |
| Hydropower | 1,547 | 1,535 | 3,125 | 3,117 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4,672 | 4,652 |
| Nuclear power | 1,480 | 1,472 | 1,334 | 1,539 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2,814 | 3,011 |
| Combined heat and power | 452 | 456 | 9 | 9 | 4,760 | 4,482 | 186 | 186 | 128 | 109 | 5,534 | 5,242 |
| Condensing power | 376 | 376 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 376 | 376 |
| Wind power | 0 | 0 | 75 | 38 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 32 | 0 | 107 | 38 |
| Solar power | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 35 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 185 | 15 | 220 | 15 |
| Total | 3,854 | 3,839 | 4,543 | 4,703 | 4,794 | 4,482 | 186 | 186 | 345 | 124 | 13,722 | 13,334 |
| Finland | Sweden | Russia | Poland | Other | Total | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fortum's heat production capacity by area, MW | 2017 | 2016 | 2017 | 2016 | 2017 | 2016 | 2017 | 2016 | 2017 | 2016 | 2017 | 2016 |
| Heat | 1,941 | 2,024 | 35 | 35 | 10,094 | 9,920 | 786 | 961 | 1,909 | 798 | 14,765 | 13,738 |
| Operating and financial review |
Consolidated financial statements |
Notes | Key figures 2008–2017 |
Parent company financial statements |
Proposal for the use of the profit shown on the balance sheet |
Auditor's report |
Operational key figures Quarterly financial information |
Investor information |
|||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Operational key figures | Quarterly financial information | ||||||||||||
| Sales | |||||||||||||
| Fortum's total power and heat sales in EU and Norway, EUR million | 2008 | 2009 | 2010 | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | 2014 | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | |||
| Electricity sales | 2,959 | 2,802 | 3,110 | 2,868 | 2,700 | 2,462 | 2,344 | 1,921 | 1,893 | 2,244 | |||
| Heat sales | 1,157 | 1,095 | 1,309 | 1,278 | 1,201 | 538 | 468 | 423 | 449 | 524 | |||
| Fortum's total power and heat sales in Russia, EUR million | 2008 | 2009 | 2010 | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | 2014 | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | |||
| Electricity sales | 332 | 390 | 505 | 590 | 713 | 822 | 758 | 661 | 691 | 837 | |||
| Heat sales | 141 | 219 | 287 | 324 | 300 | 290 | 285 | 228 | 199 | 258 | |||
| Fortum's total power sales by area, TWh | 2008 | 2009 | 2010 | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | 2014 | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | |||
| Finland | 28.7 | 26.1 | 30.7 | 24.6 | 21.6 | 23.4 | 21.6 | 22.3 | 22.8 | 22.5 | |||
| Sweden | 28.5 | 26.9 | 28.3 | 29.4 | 30.1 | 23.3 | 28.2 | 29.8 | 28.8 | 30.8 | |||
| Norway | 1.5 | 7.2 | |||||||||||
| Russia | 14.8 | 19.5 | 18.7 | 20.2 | 23.3 | 25.6 | 26.5 | 29.4 | 29.5 | 30.5 | |||
| Other countries | 3.0 | 3.2 | 3.2 | 3.6 | 3.8 | 4.3 | 3.8 | 2.8 | 2.1 | 2.9 | |||
| Total | 75.0 | 75.7 | 80.9 | 77.8 | 78.8 | 76.6 | 80.1 | 84.3 | 84.7 | 93.9 | |||
| Fortum's total heat sales by area, TWh | 2008 | 2009 | 2010 | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | 2014 | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | |||
| Finland | 10.8 | 8.0 | 9.6 | 8.5 | 5.8 | 5.5 | 3.2 | 3.1 | 3.6 | 3.9 | |||
| Russia | 15.3 | 25.6 | 26.8 | 26.7 | 26.4 | 24.1 | 26.0 | 25.4 | 20.7 | 19.8 | |||
| Sweden | 9.1 | 9.8 | 10.9 | 8.5 | 8.5 | - | - | - | 0.1 | 0.3 | |||
| Poland | 3.6 | 3.7 | 4.0 | 4.3 | 4.3 | 4.1 | 3.4 | 3.4 | 3.6 | 3.7 | |||
| Other countries | 3.4 | 3.5 | 3.6 | 3.4 | 2.9 | 3.1 | 2.8 | 1.2 | 1.4 | 2.2 | |||
| Total | 42.2 | 50.6 | 54.9 | 51.4 | 47.9 | 36.8 | 35.4 | 33.2 | 29.4 | 29.9 |
| Volume of distributed electricity in distribution networks, TWh | 2008 | 2009 | 2010 | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | 2014 | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Finland | 9.3 | 9.4 | 10.0 | 9.5 | 9.8 | 9.5 | 2.8 | - | - | - |
| Sweden | 14.0 | 14.0 | 15.2 | 14.2 | 14.4 | 14.1 | 13.7 | 6.4 | - | - |
| Norway | 2.3 | 2.3 | 2.5 | 2.3 | 2.4 | 2.5 | 1.1 | - | - | - |
| Estonia | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.1 | 0.0 | - | - | - | - | - |
| Total | 25.8 | 25.9 | 27.9 | 26.1 | 26.6 | 26.1 | 17.6 | 6.4 | - | - |
2008–2017
Operational key figures Quarterly financial information
Note: Quarterly financial information is unaudited.
| EUR million | Q1/2016 | Q2/2016 | Q3/2016 | Q4/2016 | 2016 | Q1/2017 | Q2/2017 | Q3/2017 | Q4/2017 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IS Sales | 989 | 768 | 732 | 1,143 | 3,632 | 1,232 | 937 | 919 | 1,432 | 4,520 |
| Comparable EBITDA continuing operations | 357 | 209 | 151 | 298 | 1,015 | 423 | 219 | 210 | 424 | 1,275 |
| IS Comparable operating profit | 275 | 122 | 58 | 188 | 644 | 313 | 109 | 94 | 295 | 811 |
| IS Operating profit | 369 | 67 | -6 | 202 | 633 | 389 | 66 | 387 | 315 | 1,158 |
| IS Share of profit/loss of associates and joint ventures | 67 | 38 | 11 | 15 | 131 | 59 | 35 | 21 | 34 | 148 |
| IS Finance costs - net | -47 | -44 | -44 | -34 | -169 | -36 | -52 | -58 | -49 | -195 |
| IS Profit before income tax | 390 | 61 | -40 | 184 | 595 | 412 | 49 | 351 | 300 | 1,111 |
| IS Income tax expense | -59 | -4 | 9 | -37 | -90 | -72 | -118 | 4 | -43 | -229 |
| IS Profit for the period | 331 | 57 | -31 | 147 | 504 | 340 | -69 | 355 | 257 | 882 |
| IS Non-controlling interests | -5 | -1 | 0 | -3 | -8 | -5 | 0 | 2 | -12 | -16 |
| IS Profit for the period, owners of the parent | 326 | 57 | -31 | 145 | 496 | 335 | -70 | 357 | 244 | 866 |
| Earnings per share for profit attributable to the equity owners of the company (EUR per share) |
||||||||||
| Basic | 0.37 | 0.06 | -0.03 | 0.16 | 0.56 | 0.38 | -0.08 | 0.40 | 0.28 | 0.98 |
EUR million
Operational key figures Quarterly financial information
| EUR million | Q1/2016 | Q2/2016 | Q3/2016 | Q4/2016 | 2016 | Q1/2017 | Q2/2017 | Q3/2017 | Q4/2017 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Generation 1) | 467 | 384 | 371 | 435 | 1,657 | 474 | 402 | 367 | 433 | 1,677 |
| City Solutions 1) | 228 | 121 | 116 | 316 | 782 | 290 | 205 | 179 | 341 | 1,016 |
| Consumer Solutions | 175 | 146 | 126 | 221 | 668 | 242 | 164 | 238 | 453 | 1,097 |
| Russia | 249 | 182 | 175 | 289 | 896 | 349 | 238 | 200 | 314 | 1,101 |
| Other 1) | 24 | 23 | 22 | 24 | 92 | 24 | 24 | 25 | 28 | 101 |
| Netting of Nord Pool transactions 2) | -120 | -69 | -66 | -129 | -384 | -118 | -73 | -73 | -103 | -367 |
| Eliminations | -33 | -19 | -14 | -13 | -79 | -29 | -23 | -17 | -34 | -103 |
| IS Total | 989 | 768 | 732 | 1,143 | 3,632 | 1,232 | 937 | 919 | 1,432 | 4,520 |
1) Sales, both internal and external, includes effects from realised hedging contracts. Effect on sales can be negative or positive depending on the average contract price and realised spot price.
2) Sales and purchases with Nord Pool Spot is netted on Group level on an hourly basis and posted either as revenue or cost depending on if Fortum is a net seller or net buyer during any particular hour.
| EUR million | Q1/2016 | Q2/2016 | Q3/2016 | Q4/2016 | 2016 | Q1/2017 | Q2/2017 | Q3/2017 | Q4/2017 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Generation | 155 | 98 | 77 | 87 | 417 | 136 | 78 | 104 | 160 | 478 |
| City Solutions | 44 | -5 | -25 | 50 | 64 | 56 | 1 | -20 | 59 | 96 |
| Consumer Solutions | 14 | 13 | 9 | 13 | 48 | 12 | 6 | 5 | 18 | 41 |
| Russia | 79 | 34 | 12 | 66 | 191 | 132 | 53 | 26 | 84 | 296 |
| Other | -16 | -18 | -16 | -27 | -77 | -24 | -28 | -21 | -26 | -99 |
| IS Comparable operating profit | 275 | 122 | 58 | 188 | 644 | 313 | 109 | 94 | 295 | 811 |
| Impairment charges | 0 | 0 | 0 | 27 | 27 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 6 |
| Capital gains and other | 44 | 2 | -10 | 2 | 38 | 1 | 1 | 317 | 8 | 326 |
| Changes in fair values of derivatives hedging future cash flow | 50 | -57 | -57 | -1 | -65 | 74 | -46 | -19 | 5 | 14 |
| Nuclear fund adjustment | 0 | 0 | 2 | -14 | -11 | 2 | 4 | -5 | 1 | 1 |
| IS Operating profit | 369 | 67 | -6 | 202 | 633 | 389 | 66 | 387 | 315 | 1,158 |
The first and last quarters of the year are usually the strongest quarters for power and heat businesses.
Fortum's 2017 reporting entity comprises Online Annual Review, CEO letter, Financials, Corporate Governance Statement and Remuneration Statement as well as Tax footprint.
The Annual General Meeting 2018 of Fortum Corporation will be held on Wednesday, 28 March 2018 at 11.00 EET at Finlandia Hall, address: Mannerheimintie 13 e, Helsinki, Finland. The reception of the registered participants will commence at 9.30 EET.
The Board of Directors proposes to the Annual General Meeting that Fortum Corporation pays a dividend of EUR 1.10 per share for 2017, totalling approximately EUR 977 million based on the registered shares as of 1 February 2018. The possible dividend related dates planned for 2018 are:
Fortum will publish three interim reports in 2018:
The reports are published at approximately 9:00 EET in Finnish and English, and are available on Fortum's website at www.fortum.com/investors
Fortum's management hosts regular press conferences, targeted at analysts and the media. Webcasts of these conferences is available online at www.fortum.com/investors. Management also gives interviews on a one-on-one and group basis. Fortum observes closed and silent period of 30 days prior to publishing its results.
Listed on Nasdaq Helsinki Trading ticker: FORTUM Number of shares, 2 February 2018: 888,367,045 Sector: Utilities
Fortum's Investor Relations activities cover equity and fixed-income markets to ensure full and fair valuation of the Company's shares, access to funding sources and stable bond pricing. The key task of Investor Relations is to provide correct, adequate and up-to-date information regularly and equally to all market participants. By doing this, Investor Relations aims to minimise the investor's risk and reduce the share's volatility. Investors and analysts primarily are met on a regular basis in Europe and North America.
In 2017, Fortum met approximately 200 professional equity investors individually or in group meetings and at investor conferences and maintained regular contact with equity research analysts at investment banks and brokerage firms.
Building tools?
Free accounts include 100 API calls/year for testing.
Have a question? We'll get back to you promptly.