Skip to main content

AI assistant

Sign in to chat with this filing

The assistant answers questions, extracts KPIs, and summarises risk factors directly from the filing text.

1ST SOURCE CORP Interim / Quarterly Report 2013

Jul 25, 2013

31876_10-q_2013-07-25_94122173-253c-4027-a0f1-533313f4ad37.zip

Interim / Quarterly Report

Open in viewer

Opens in your device viewer

{# SEO P0-1: filing HTML is rendered server-side so Googlebot sees the full text without executing JS or following an iframe to a Disallow'd CDN path. The content has already been sanitized through filings.seo.sanitize_filing_html. #}

10-Q 1 a13-13452_110q.htm 10-Q

Table of Contents

*UNITED STATES*

*SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION*

*Washington, D.C. 20549*

*FORM 10-Q*

*(Mark One)*

*x QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934*

*For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2013*

*OR*

*o TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934*

*For the transition period from to*

*Commission file number 0-6233*

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

INDIANA 35-1068133
(State or other jurisdiction of (I.R.S. Employer Identification
incorporation or organization) No.)
100 North Michigan Street
South Bend, IN 46601
(Address of principal executive (Zip Code)
offices)

*(574) 235-2000*

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

*Not Applicable*

(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. x Yes o No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). x Yes o No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Large accelerated filer o Accelerated filer x
Non-accelerated filer o (Do not check if a smaller reporting company) Smaller reporting company o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). o Yes x No

Number of shares of common stock outstanding as of July 12, 2013 — 24,375,595 shares

SEQ.=1,FOLIO='',FILE='C:\JMS\106756\13-13452-1\task6140188\13452-1-ba.htm',USER='106756',CD='Jul 19 23:42 2013'

Table of Contents

*TABLE OF CONTENT S*

Page
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Financial Statements (Unaudited)
Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition — June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012 3
Consolidated Statements of Income — three and six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012 4
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income — three and six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012 5
Consolidated Statements of Shareholders’ Equity — six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012 5
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows — six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012 6
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements 7
Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations 32
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk 41
Item 4. Controls and Procedures 41
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings 41
Item 1A. Risk Factors 41
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds 42
Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities 42
Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures 42
Item 5. Other Information 42
Item 6. Exhibits 42
SIGNATURES 43
CERTIFICATIONS
Exhibit 31.1
Exhibit 31.2
Exhibit 32.1
Exhibit 32.2

2

SEQ.=1,FOLIO='2',FILE='C:\JMS\106756\13-13452-1\task6140188\13452-1-bg.htm',USER='106756',CD='Jul 19 23:42 2013'

Table of Contents

*1st SOURCE CORPORATION*

*CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION*

**(Unaudited - Dollars in thousands)****

June 30, — 2013 December 31, — 2012
ASSETS
Cash and due from banks $ 64,850 $ 83,232
Federal funds sold and interest bearing deposits with other banks 3,171 702
Investment securities available-for-sale (amortized cost of $815,626 and $849,139 at June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively) 828,312 880,764
Other investments 22,409 22,609
Trading account securities 166 146
Mortgages held for sale 10,849 10,879
Loans and leases - net of unearned discount
Commercial and agricultural loans 660,380 639,069
Auto, light truck and environmental equipment 510,562 438,147
Medium and heavy duty truck 178,594 172,002
Aircraft financing 677,510 696,479
Construction equipment financing 311,135 278,974
Commercial real estate 576,810 554,968
Residential real estate 454,983 438,641
Consumer loans 123,411 109,273
Total loans and leases 3,493,385 3,327,553
Reserve for loan and lease losses (85,690 ) (83,311 )
Net loans and leases 3,407,695 3,244,242
Equipment owned under operating leases, net 52,856 52,173
Net premises and equipment 46,027 45,016
Goodwill and intangible assets 86,915 87,502
Accrued income and other assets 115,561 123,428
Total assets $ 4,638,811 $ 4,550,693
LIABILITIES
Deposits:
Noninterest bearing $ 698,389 $ 646,380
Interest bearing 3,002,410 2,977,967
Total deposits 3,700,799 3,624,347
Short-term borrowings:
Federal funds purchased and securities sold under agreements to repurchase 162,778 158,680
Other short-term borrowings 39,126 10,508
Total short-term borrowings 201,904 169,188
Long-term debt and mandatorily redeemable securities 58,216 71,021
Subordinated notes 58,764 58,764
Accrued expenses and other liabilities 51,375 68,718
Total liabilities 4,071,058 3,992,038
SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Preferred stock; no par value
Authorized 10,000,000 shares; none issued or outstanding — —
Common stock; no par value
Authorized 40,000,000 shares; issued 25,641,887 at June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012 346,535 346,535
Retained earnings 241,401 223,715
Cost of common stock in treasury (1,269,292 shares at June 30, 2013 and 1,399,261 shares at December 31, 2012) (28,021 ) (31,134 )
Accumulated other comprehensive income 7,838 19,539
Total shareholders’ equity 567,753 558,655
Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity $ 4,638,811 $ 4,550,693

The accompanying notes are a part of the consolidated financial statements.

3

SEQ.=1,FOLIO='3',FILE='C:\JMS\106756\13-13452-1\task6140188\13452-1-fa.htm',USER='106756',CD='Jul 19 23:46 2013'

Table of Contents

*1st SOURCE CORPORATION*

*CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME*

**(Unaudited - Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)****

Three Months Ended — June 30, Six Months Ended — June 30,
2013 2012 2013 2012
Interest income:
Loans and leases $ 40,112 $ 40,318 $ 79,282 $ 80,214
Investment securities, taxable 3,498 4,334 7,193 8,661
Investment securities, tax-exempt 760 848 1,531 1,700
Other 241 231 483 457
Total interest income 44,611 45,731 88,489 91,032
Interest expense:
Deposits 4,412 5,704 8,954 11,449
Short-term borrowings 45 47 77 100
Subordinated notes 1,055 1,648 2,110 3,295
Long-term debt and mandatorily redeemable securities 228 357 723 828
Total interest expense 5,740 7,756 11,864 15,672
Net interest income 38,871 37,975 76,625 75,360
Provision for loan and lease losses 1,293 2,055 2,050 4,309
Net interest income after provision for loan and lease losses 37,578 35,920 74,575 71,051
Noninterest income:
Trust fees 4,439 4,379 8,540 8,352
Service charges on deposit accounts 2,325 2,621 4,564 5,059
Debit card income 2,344 2,194 4,409 4,261
Mortgage banking income 1,936 1,502 3,564 3,444
Insurance commissions 1,393 1,211 2,839 2,568
Equipment rental income 4,086 4,666 8,098 10,016
Investment securities and other investment gains 38 8 211 403
Other income 3,560 3,209 6,844 6,210
Total noninterest income 20,121 19,790 39,069 40,313
Noninterest expense:
Salaries and employee benefits 19,176 20,370 39,112 40,686
Net occupancy expense 2,147 1,848 4,354 4,008
Furniture and equipment expense 3,909 3,831 7,808 7,338
Depreciation - leased equipment 3,274 3,803 6,499 8,114
Professional fees 1,310 1,449 2,665 2,847
Supplies and communication 1,499 1,385 3,035 2,778
FDIC and other insurance 927 854 1,805 1,803
Business development and marketing expense 932 1,050 1,705 1,917
Loan and lease collection and repossession expense 1,095 979 1,852 2,480
Other expense 1,475 1,009 3,459 2,655
Total noninterest expense 35,744 36,578 72,294 74,626
Income before income taxes 21,955 19,132 41,350 36,738
Income tax expense 8,013 6,565 15,004 12,456
Net income $ 13,942 $ 12,567 $ 26,346 $ 24,282
Per common share:
Basic net income per common share $ 0.56 $ 0.51 $ 1.07 $ 0.99
Diluted net income per common share $ 0.56 $ 0.51 $ 1.07 $ 0.99
Dividends $ 0.17 $ 0.16 $ 0.34 $ 0.32
Basic weighted average common shares outstanding 24,367,529 24,263,881 24,344,882 24,261,649
Diluted weighted average common shares outstanding 24,368,973 24,273,898 24,346,053 24,272,423

The accompanying notes are a part of the consolidated financial statements.

4

SEQ.=1,FOLIO='4',FILE='C:\JMS\106756\13-13452-1\task6140188\13452-1-fa.htm',USER='106756',CD='Jul 19 23:46 2013'

Table of Contents

*1st SOURCE CORPORATION*

*CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME*

**(Unaudited - Dollars in thousands)****

Three Months Ended Six Months Ended
June 30, June 30,
2013 2012 2013 2012
Net income $ 13,942 $ 12,567 $ 26,346 $ 24,282
Other comprehensive (loss) income, net of tax:
Change in unrealized (depreciation) appreciation of available-for-sale securities, net of tax (10,495 ) 1,449 (11,701 ) 1,047
Reclassification adjustment for gains included in net income, net of tax — — — (171 )
Other comprehensive (loss) income (10,495 ) 1,449 (11,701 ) 876
Comprehensive income $ 3,447 $ 14,016 $ 14,645 $ 25,158

The accompanying notes are a part of the consolidated financial statements.

*1st SOURCE CORPORATION*

*CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY*

**(Unaudited - Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)****

Cost of Accumulated
Common Other
Preferred Common Retained Stock Comprehensive
Total Stock Stock Earnings in Treasury Income (Loss), Net
Balance at January 1, 2012 $ 523,918 $ — $ 346,535 $ 190,261 $ (31,389 ) $ 18,511
Net income 24,282 — — 24,282 — —
Other comprehensive income 876 — — — — 876
Issuance of 165,460 common shares under stock based compensation awards, including related tax effects 3,644 — — 85 3,559 —
Cost of 104,471 shares of common stock acquired for treasury (2,617 ) — — — (2,617 ) —
Common stock dividend ($0.32 per share) (7,839 ) — — (7,839 ) — —
Balance at June 30, 2012 $ 542,264 $ — $ 346,535 $ 206,789 $ (30,447 ) $ 19,387
Balance at January 1, 2013 $ 558,655 $ — $ 346,535 $ 223,715 $ (31,134 ) $ 19,539
Net income 26,346 — — 26,346 — —
Other comprehensive loss (11,701 ) — — — — (11,701 )
Issuance of 157,032 common shares under stock based compensation awards, including related tax effects 3,419 — — (313 ) 3,732 —
Cost of 27,063 shares of common stock acquired for treasury (619 ) — — — (619 ) —
Common stock dividend ($0.34 per share) (8,347 ) — — (8,347 ) — —
Balance at June 30, 2013 $ 567,753 $ — $ 346,535 $ 241,401 $ (28,021 ) $ 7,838

The accompanying notes are a part of the consolidated financial statements.

5

SEQ.=1,FOLIO='5',FILE='C:\JMS\106756\13-13452-1\task6140188\13452-1-fa.htm',USER='106756',CD='Jul 19 23:46 2013'

Table of Contents

*1st SOURCE CORPORATION*

*CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS*

**(Unaudited - Dollars in thousands)****

Six Months Ended June 30, — 2013 2012
Operating activities:
Net income $ 26,346 $ 24,282
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided (used) by operating activities:
Provision for loan and lease losses 2,050 4,309
Depreciation of premises and equipment 2,331 2,094
Depreciation of equipment owned and leased to others 6,499 8,114
Amortization of investment security premiums and accretion of discounts, net 1,929 1,999
Amortization of mortgage servicing rights 937 1,528
Mortgage servicing asset recoveries — (147 )
Deferred income taxes (2,020 ) (3,996 )
Investment securities and other investment gains (211 ) (403 )
Originations of loans held for sale, net of principal collected (59,773 ) (96,948 )
Proceeds from the sales of loans held for sale 62,295 94,491
Net gain on sale of loans held for sale (2,492 ) (2,736 )
Change in trading account securities (20 ) (6 )
Change in interest receivable (912 ) (312 )
Change in interest payable 1,041 1,702
Change in other assets 10,939 7,894
Change in other liabilities (7,795 ) (4,542 )
Other 341 586
Net change in operating activities 41,485 37,909
Investing activities:
Proceeds from sales of investment securities — 40,236
Proceeds from maturities of investment securities 112,836 159,553
Purchases of investment securities (81,041 ) (169,504 )
Net change in other investments 200 (960 )
Loans sold or participated to others 19,819 15,494
Net change in loans and leases (187,832 ) (199,988 )
Net change in equipment owned under operating leases (7,182 ) 3,173
Purchases of premises and equipment (3,361 ) (3,082 )
Net change in investing activities (146,561 ) (155,078 )
Financing activities:
Net change in demand deposits, NOW accounts and savings accounts 61,457 92,814
Net change in certificates of deposit 14,995 (26,938 )
Net change in short-term borrowings 32,716 8,694
Proceeds from issuance of long-term debt 12,035 25,600
Payments on long-term debt (26,296 ) (268 )
Net proceeds from issuance of treasury stock 3,419 3,644
Acquisition of treasury stock (619 ) (2,617 )
Cash dividends paid on common stock (8,544 ) (8,007 )
Net change in financing activities 89,163 92,922
Net change in cash and cash equivalents (15,913 ) (24,247 )
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of year 83,934 114,327
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period $ 68,021 $ 90,080
Supplemental Information:
Non-cash transactions:
Loans transferred to other real estate and repossessed assets $ 2,510 $ 1,791
Common stock matching contribution to Employee Stock Ownership and Profit Sharing Plan 2,801 2,643

The accompanying notes are a part of the consolidated financial statements.

6

SEQ.=1,FOLIO='6',FILE='C:\JMS\106756\13-13452-1\task6140188\13452-1-fa.htm',USER='106756',CD='Jul 19 23:46 2013'

Table of Contents

*1ST SOURCE CORPORATION*

*NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS*

*(Unaudited)*

*Note 1. Basis of Presentation*

1st Source Corporation is a bank holding company headquartered in South Bend, Indiana that provides, through its subsidiaries (collectively referred to as “1st Source” or “the Company”), a broad array of financial products and services. The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements reflect all adjustments (all of which are normal and recurring in nature) which are, in the opinion of management, necessary for a fair presentation of the consolidated financial position, the results of operations, changes in comprehensive income, changes in shareholders’ equity, and cash flows for the periods presented. These unaudited consolidated financial statements have been prepared according to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and, therefore, certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) have been omitted.

The Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements appearing in 1st Source Corporation’s Annual Report on Form 10-K (2012 Annual Report), which include descriptions of significant accounting policies, should be read in conjunction with these interim financial statements. The Consolidated Statement of Financial Condition at December 31, 2012 has been derived from the audited financial statements at that date but does not include all of the information and footnotes required by U.S. generally accepted accounting principles for complete financial statements. Certain amounts in the prior period consolidated financial statements have been reclassified to conform to the current year presentation.

*Note 2. Recent Accounting Pronouncements*

Comprehensive Income: In February 2013, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) No. 2013-02 “ Comprehensive Income (Topic 220) — Reporting of Amounts Reclassified Out of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income.” ASU 2013-02 requires an entity to provide information about the amounts reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive income by component. ASU 2013-02 is effective prospectively during interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2012. The Company has adopted the standard as required, however the effect of applying this standard is not reflected in the June 30, 2013 Form 10Q as the Company did not have amounts reclassified out of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income during the three or six months ended June 30, 2013. Amounts in future periods, when they occur, will be reflected in the investment securities and other investment gains and the income tax expense line items in the Consolidated Statements of Income.

Clarifying the Scope of Disclosures about Offsetting Assets and Liabilities: In January 2013, the FASB issued ASU No. 2013-01 “Balance Sheet (Topic 210) — Clarifying the Scope of Disclosures about Offsetting Assets and Liabilities.” ASU 2013-01 clarifies that ordinary trade receivables and receivables are not in the scope of ASU 2011-11. ASU 2011-11 applies only to derivatives, repurchase agreements, and securities borrowing and securities lending transactions that are either offset in accordance with specific criteria in the Accounting Standards Codification or subject to a master netting arrangement or similar agreement. ASU 2011-11 is effective for annual reporting periods beginning on or after January 1, 2013, and interim periods within those annual periods. Retrospective disclosure is required for all comparative periods presented. The effect of applying this standard is reflected in Note 8 — Derivative Financial Instruments.

7

SEQ.=1,FOLIO='7',FILE='C:\JMS\106756\13-13452-1\task6140188\13452-1-fn.htm',USER='106756',CD='Jul 19 23:47 2013'

Table of Contents

Offsetting Assets and Liabilities: In December 2011, the FASB issued ASU No. 2011-11 “Balance Sheet (Topic 210) - Disclosures about Offsetting Assets and Liabilities.” ASU 2011-11 requires an entity to disclose both gross information and net information about both instruments and transactions eligible for offset in the statement of financial position and instruments and transactions subject to an agreement similar to a master netting arrangement. ASU 2011-11 is effective for annual reporting periods beginning on or after January 1, 2013, and interim periods within those annual periods. Retrospective disclosure is required for all comparative periods presented. The effect of applying this standard is reflected in Note 8 — Derivative Financial Instruments.

*Note 3. Investment Securities*

Investment securities available-for-sale were as follows:

(Dollars in thousands) Amortized — Cost Gross — Unrealized Gains Gross — Unrealized Losses Fair Value
June 30, 2013
U.S. Treasury and Federal agencies securities $ 391,452 $ 6,545 $ (5,357 ) $ 392,640
U.S. States and political subdivisions securities 103,875 3,949 (1,186 ) 106,638
Mortgage-backed securities — Federal agencies 287,099 6,749 (2,626 ) 291,222
Corporate debt securities 28,133 216 (18 ) 28,331
Foreign government and other securities 2,700 9 (1 ) 2,708
Total debt securities 813,259 17,468 (9,188 ) 821,539
Marketable equity securities 2,367 4,409 (3 ) 6,773
Total investment securities available-for-sale $ 815,626 $ 21,877 $ (9,191 ) $ 828,312
December 31, 2012
U.S. Treasury and Federal agencies securities $ 410,983 $ 11,353 $ (83 ) $ 422,253
U.S. States and political subdivisions securities 100,055 5,864 (482 ) 105,437
Mortgage-backed securities — Federal agencies 301,136 11,296 (25 ) 312,407
Corporate debt securities 30,897 445 (94 ) 31,248
Foreign government and other securities 3,700 26 — 3,726
Total debt securities 846,771 28,984 (684 ) 875,071
Marketable equity securities 2,368 3,329 (4 ) 5,693
Total investment securities available-for-sale $ 849,139 $ 32,313 $ (688 ) $ 880,764

At June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, the residential mortgage-backed securities held by the Company consisted primarily of GNMA, FNMA and FHLMC pass-through certificates which are guaranteed by those respective agencies of the United States government (Government Sponsored Enterprise, GSEs).

The contractual maturities of investments in debt securities available-for-sale at June 30, 2013 are shown below. Expected maturities will differ from contractual maturities, because borrowers may have the right to call or prepay obligations with or without call or prepayment penalties.

(Dollars in thousands) Amortized Cost Fair Value
Due in one year or less $ 123,887 $ 123,155
Due after one year through five years 330,448 336,000
Due after five years through ten years 70,565 69,983
Due after ten years 1,260 1,179
Mortgage-backed securities 287,099 291,222
Total debt securities available-for-sale $ 813,259 $ 821,539

8

SEQ.=1,FOLIO='8',FILE='C:\JMS\106756\13-13452-1\task6140188\13452-1-fn.htm',USER='106756',CD='Jul 19 23:47 2013'

Table of Contents

The following table shows the gross realized gains and losses on sale of securities from the securities available-for-sale portfolio, including marketable equity securities. Realized gains and losses on the sales of all securities are computed using the specific identification cost basis. There were no other-than-temporary-impairment (OTTI) write-downs in 2013 or 2012.

Three Months Ended — June 30, Six Months Ended — June 30,
(Dollars in thousands) 2013 2012 2013 2012
Gross realized gains $ — $ — $ — $ 275
Gross realized losses — — — —
Net realized gains $ — $ — $ — $ 275

The following table summarizes gross unrealized losses and fair value by investment category and age.

Less than 12 Months — Fair Unrealized 12 months or Longer — Fair Unrealized Total — Fair Unrealized
(Dollars in thousands) Value Losses Value Losses Value Losses
June 30, 2013
U.S. Treasury and Federal agencies securities $ 186,172 $ (5,185 ) $ 15,069 $ (172 ) $ 201,241 $ (5,357 )
U.S. States and political subdivisions securities 29,755 (875 ) 2,343 (311 ) 32,098 (1,186 )
Mortgage-backed securities - Federal agencies 70,652 (2,625 ) 52 (1 ) 70,704 (2,626 )
Corporate debt securities — — 4,507 (18 ) 4,507 (18 )
Foreign government and other securities 199 (1 ) — — 199 (1 )
Total debt securities 286,778 (8,686 ) 21,971 (502 ) 308,749 (9,188 )
Marketable equity securities — — 5 (3 ) 5 (3 )
Total investment securities available-for-sale $ 286,778 $ (8,686 ) $ 21,976 $ (505 ) $ 308,754 $ (9,191 )
December 31, 2012
U.S. Treasury and Federal agencies securities $ 37,316 $ (83 ) $ — $ — $ 37,316 $ (83 )
U.S. States and political subdivisions securities 7,730 (46 ) 3,364 (436 ) 11,094 (482 )
Mortgage-backed securities - Federal agencies 6,264 (24 ) 60 (1 ) 6,324 (25 )
Corporate debt securities — — 4,431 (94 ) 4,431 (94 )
Foreign government and other securities 100 — — — 100 —
Total debt securities 51,410 (153 ) 7,855 (531 ) 59,265 (684 )
Marketable equity securities — — 5 (4 ) 5 (4 )
Total investment securities available-for-sale $ 51,410 $ (153 ) $ 7,860 $ (535 ) $ 59,270 $ (688 )

The initial indication of OTTI for both debt and equity securities is a decline in fair value below amortized cost. Quarterly, the impaired securities are analyzed on a qualitative and quantitative basis in determining OTTI. Declines in the fair value of available-for-sale debt securities below their cost that are deemed to be other-than-temporary are reflected in earnings as realized losses to the extent the impairment is related to credit losses. The amount of impairment related to other factors is recognized in other comprehensive income. In estimating OTTI impairment losses, the Company considers among other things, (i) the length of time and the extent to which fair value has been less than cost, (ii) the financial condition and near-term prospects of the issuer, and (iii) whether it is more likely than not that the Company will not have to sell any such securities before a recovery of cost.

At June 30, 2013, the Company does not have the intent to sell any of the available-for-sale securities in the table above and believes that it is more likely than not, that it will not have to sell any such securities before an anticipated recovery of cost. Primarily the unrealized losses on debt securities are due to market volatility and market illiquidity on auction rate securities which are reflected in U.S. States and political subdivisions. The fair value is expected to recover on all debt securities as they approach their maturity date or re-pricing date or if market yields for such investments decline. The Company does not believe any of the securities are impaired due to reasons of credit quality.

9

SEQ.=1,FOLIO='9',FILE='C:\JMS\106756\13-13452-1\task6140188\13452-1-fn.htm',USER='106756',CD='Jul 19 23:47 2013'

Table of Contents

At June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, investment securities with carrying values of $234.05 million and $216.34 million, respectively, were pledged as collateral to secure government deposits, security repurchase agreements, and for other purposes.

*Note 4. Loan and Lease Financings*

The Company evaluates loans and leases for credit quality at least annually but more frequently if certain circumstances occur (such as material new information which becomes available and indicates a potential change in credit risk). The Company uses two methods to assess credit risk: loan or lease credit quality grades and credit risk classifications. The purpose of the loan or lease credit quality grade is to document the degree of risk associated with individual credits as well as inform management of the degree of risk in the portfolio taken as a whole. Credit risk classifications are used to categorize loans by degree of risk and to designate individual or committee approval authorities for higher risk credits at the time of origination. Credit risk classifications include categories for: Acceptable, Marginal, Special Attention, Special Risk, Restricted by Policy, Regulated and Prohibited by Law.

All loans and leases, except residential real estate loans and consumer loans, are assigned credit quality grades on a scale from 1 to 12 with grade 1 representing superior credit quality. The criteria used to assign grades to extensions of credit that exhibit potential problems or well-defined weaknesses are primarily based upon the degree of risk and the likelihood of orderly repayment, and their effect on the Company’s safety and soundness. Loans or leases graded 7 or weaker are considered “special attention” credits and, as such, relationships in excess of $100,000 are reviewed quarterly as part of management’s evaluation of the appropriateness of the reserve for loan and lease losses. Grade 7 credits are defined as “watch” and contain greater than average credit risk and are monitored to limit the exposure to increased risk; grade 8 credits are “special mention” and, following regulatory guidelines, are defined as having potential weaknesses that deserve management’s close attention. Credits that exhibit well-defined weaknesses and a distinct possibility of loss are considered “classified” and are graded 9 through 12 corresponding to the regulatory definitions of “substandard” (grades 9 and 10) and the more severe “doubtful” (grade 11) and “loss” (grade 12).

The table below presents the credit quality grades of the recorded investment in loans and leases, segregated by class.

(Dollars in thousands) Credit Quality Grades — 1-6 7-12 Total
June 30, 2013
Commercial and agricultural loans $ 632,373 $ 28,007 $ 660,380
Auto, light truck and environmental equipment 498,023 12,539 510,562
Medium and heavy duty truck 176,267 2,327 178,594
Aircraft financing 634,459 43,051 677,510
Construction equipment financing 296,960 14,175 311,135
Commercial real estate 542,186 34,624 576,810
Total $ 2,780,268 $ 134,723 $ 2,914,991
December 31, 2012
Commercial and agricultural loans $ 612,567 $ 26,502 $ 639,069
Auto, light truck and environmental equipment 428,582 9,565 438,147
Medium and heavy duty truck 170,116 1,886 172,002
Aircraft financing 648,316 48,163 696,479
Construction equipment financing 262,980 15,994 278,974
Commercial real estate 507,219 47,749 554,968
Total $ 2,629,780 $ 149,859 $ 2,779,639

10

SEQ.=1,FOLIO='10',FILE='C:\JMS\106756\13-13452-1\task6140188\13452-1-fn.htm',USER='106756',CD='Jul 19 23:47 2013'

Table of Contents

For residential real estate and consumer loans, credit quality is based on the aging status of the loan and by payment activity. The table below presents the recorded investment in residential real estate and consumer loans by performing or nonperforming status. Nonperforming loans are those loans which are on nonaccrual status or are 90 days or more past due.

(Dollars in thousands) Performing Nonperforming Total
Juune 30, 2013
Residential real estate $ 452,262 $ 2,721 $ 454,983
Consumer 122,986 425 123,411
Total $ 575,248 $ 3,146 $ 578,394
December 31, 2012
Residential real estate $ 435,962 $ 2,679 $ 438,641
Consumer 108,814 459 109,273
Total $ 544,776 $ 3,138 $ 547,914

The table below presents the recorded investment of loans and leases, segregated by class, with delinquency aging and nonaccrual status.

90 Days
or More
30-59 Days 60-89 Days Past Due Total Total Financing
(Dollars in thousands) Current Past Due Past Due and Accruing Accruing Loans Nonaccrual Receivables
June 30, 2013
Commercial and agricultural loans $ 652,550 $ 164 $ 149 $ — $ 652,863 $ 7,517 $ 660,380
Auto, light truck and environmental equipment 509,899 264 53 — 510,216 346 510,562
Medium and heavy duty truck 177,878 — — — 177,878 716 178,594
Aircraft financing 667,269 5,746 — — 673,015 4,495 677,510
Construction equipment financing 306,999 174 — — 307,173 3,962 311,135
Commercial real estate 567,490 — — — 567,490 9,320 576,810
Residential real estate 450,728 878 656 145 452,407 2,576 454,983
Consumer 121,887 912 187 39 123,025 386 123,411
Total $ 3,454,700 $ 8,138 $ 1,045 $ 184 $ 3,464,067 $ 29,318 $ 3,493,385
December 31, 2012
Commercial and agricultural loans $ 629,035 $ 807 $ 48 $ — $ 629,890 $ 9,179 $ 639,069
Auto, light truck and environmental equipment 437,087 202 — — 437,289 858 438,147
Medium and heavy duty truck 171,950 — — — 171,950 52 172,002
Aircraft financing 691,187 — — — 691,187 5,292 696,479
Construction equipment financing 272,817 598 274 — 273,689 5,285 278,974
Commercial real estate 541,811 102 — — 541,913 13,055 554,968
Residential real estate 434,434 1,019 509 356 436,318 2,323 438,641
Consumer 107,630 816 368 86 108,900 373 109,273
Total $ 3,285,951 $ 3,544 $ 1,199 $ 442 $ 3,291,136 $ 36,417 $ 3,327,553

11

SEQ.=1,FOLIO='11',FILE='C:\JMS\106756\13-13452-1\task6140188\13452-1-fn.htm',USER='106756',CD='Jul 19 23:47 2013'

Table of Contents

The table below presents impaired loans and leases, segregated by class, and the corresponding reserve for impaired loan and lease losses.

Recorded Unpaid — Principal Related
(Dollars in thousands) Investment Balance Allowance
June 30, 2013
With no related allowance recorded:
Commercial and agricultural loans $ 6,973 $ 6,972 $ —
Auto, light truck and environmental equipment 142 142 —
Medium and heavy duty truck 711 711 —
Aircraft financing 292 292 —
Construction equipment financing 3,895 3,893 —
Commercial real estate 17,293 17,293 —
Residential real estate — — —
Consumer loans — — —
Total with no related allowance recorded 29,306 29,303 —
With an allowance recorded:
Commercial and agricultural loans 5,235 5,235 222
Auto, light truck and environmental equipment — — —
Medium and heavy duty truck — — —
Aircraft financing 4,132 4,132 537
Construction equipment financing — — —
Commercial real estate — — —
Residential real estate — — —
Consumer loans — — —
Total with an allowance recorded 9,367 9,367 759
Total impaired loans $ 38,673 $ 38,670 $ 759
December 31, 2012
With no related allowance recorded:
Commercial and agricultural loans $ 2,572 $ 2,572 $ —
Auto, light truck and environmental equipment 474 474 —
Medium and heavy duty truck — — —
Aircraft financing 3,115 3,115 —
Construction equipment financing 5,109 5,107 —
Commercial real estate 19,597 19,597 —
Residential real estate 101 101 —
Consumer loans — — —
Total with no related allowance recorded 30,968 30,966 —
With an allowance recorded:
Commercial and agricultural loans 6,075 6,074 729
Auto, light truck and environmental equipment — — —
Medium and heavy duty truck — — —
Aircraft financing 2,086 2,086 852
Construction equipment financing — — —
Commercial real estate 1,588 1,588 42
Residential real estate — — —
Consumer loans — — —
Total with an allowance recorded 9,749 9,748 1,623
Total impaired loans $ 40,717 $ 40,714 $ 1,623

12

SEQ.=1,FOLIO='12',FILE='C:\JMS\106756\13-13452-1\task6140188\13452-1-fp.htm',USER='106756',CD='Jul 19 23:49 2013'

Table of Contents

Average recorded investment and interest income recognized on impaired loans and leases, segregated by class, is shown in the table below.

Three Months Ended June 30, — 2013 2012 Six Months Ended June 30, — 2013 2012
(Dollars in thousands) Average Recorded Investment Interest Income Average Recorded Investment Interest Income Average Recorded Investment Interest Income Average Recorded Investment Interest Income
Commercial and agricultural loans $ 8,850 $ 32 $ 9,219 $ 2 $ 8,585 $ 35 $ 9,606 $ 10
Auto, light truck and environmental equipment 159 — 3,251 — 313 — 2,421 7
Medium and heavy duty truck 237 — 940 1 118 — 1,158 1
Aircraft financing 7,868 — 8,126 — 8,068 — 10,197 —
Construction equipment financing 3,975 1 5,019 1 4,340 3 4,342 5
Commercial real estate 18,446 152 23,006 115 19,495 304 22,116 164
Residential real estate — — 106 2 — — 71 2
Consumer — — — — — — — —
Total $ 39,535 $ 185 $ 49,667 $ 121 $ 40,919 $ 342 $ 49,911 $ 189

The number of loans and leases classified as troubled debt restructuring (TDR) during the three and six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, segregated by class, are shown in the table below as well as the recorded investment as of June 30. The classification between nonperforming and performing is shown at the time of modification. During 2013 and 2012, modification programs focused on extending maturity dates or modifying payment patterns with most TDRs experiencing a combination of concessions. The modifications did not result in the contractual forgiveness of principal or interest or interest rate reductions below market rates. Consequently, the financial impact of the modifications is immaterial.

Three Months Ended June 30, — 2013 2012 Six Months Ended June 30, — 2013 2012
(Dollars in thousands) Number of Modifications Recorded Investment Number of Modifications Recorded Investment Number of Modifications Recorded Investment Number of Modifications Recorded Investment
Performing TDRs:
Commercial and agricultural loans 1 $ 750 — $ — 1 $ 750 — $ —
Auto, light truck and environmental equipment — — — — — — — —
Medium and heavy duty truck — — — — — — — —
Aircraft financing — — — — — — — —
Construction equipment financing — — — — — — — —
Commercial real estate — — 1 7,014 — — 1 7,014
Residential real estate — — — — — — 1 106
Consumer — — — — — — — —
Total performing TDR modifications 1 $ 750 1 $ 7,014 1 $ 750 2 $ 7,120
Nonperforming TDRs:
Commercial and agricultural loans — $ — — $ — 1 $ 280 — $ —
Auto, light truck and environmental equipment — — — — — — — —
Medium and heavy duty truck — — — — — — — —
Aircraft financing — — — — — — — —
Construction equipment financing — — 3 1,618 — — 3 1,618
Commercial real estate — — — — — — — —
Residential real estate — — — — — — — —
Consumer — — — — — — — —
Total nonperforming TDR modifications — $ — 3 $ 1,618 1 $ 280 3 $ 1,618
Total TDR modifications 1 $ 750 4 $ 8,632 2 $ 1,030 5 $ 8,738

There was one commercial and agricultural TDR which had payment defaults within the twelve months following modification during the three and six months ended June 30, 2013. This loan was transferred into Other Real Estate during the three months ended June 30, 2013. There were no TDRs which had payment

13

SEQ.=1,FOLIO='13',FILE='C:\JMS\106756\13-13452-1\task6140188\13452-1-fp.htm',USER='106756',CD='Jul 19 23:49 2013'

Table of Contents

defaults within twelve months following modification during the three and six months ended June 30, 2012. Default occurs when a loan or lease is 90 days or more past due under the modified terms or transferred to nonaccrual.

The table below presents the recorded investment of loans and leases classified as troubled debt restructurings as of June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012.

June 30, December 31,
(Dollars in thousands) 2013 2012
Performing TDRs $ 9,277 $ 8,839
Nonperforming TDRs 9,213 12,869
Total TDRs $ 18,490 $ 21,708

*Note 5. Reserve for Loan and Lease Losses*

The reserve for loan and lease loss methodology has been consistently applied for several years, with enhancements instituted periodically. Reserve ratios are reviewed quarterly and revised periodically to reflect recent loss history and to incorporate current risks and trends which may not be recognized in historical data. As the historical charge-off analysis is updated, the Company reviews the look-back periods for each business loan portfolio. Furthermore, a thorough analysis of charge-offs, non-performing asset levels, special attention outstandings and delinquency is performed in order to review portfolio trends and other factors, including specific industry risks and economic conditions, which may have an impact on the reserves and reserve ratios applied to various portfolios. The Company adjusts the calculated historical based ratio as a result of the analysis of environmental factors, principally economic risk and concentration risk. Key economic factors affecting the portfolios are growth in gross domestic product, unemployment rates, housing market trends, commodity prices, inflation and global economic and political issues. Concentration risk is impacted primarily by geographic concentration in Northern Indiana and Southwestern Lower Michigan in the business banking and commercial real estate portfolios and by collateral concentration in the specialty finance portfolios and exposure to foreign markets by geographic risk.

The reserve for loan and lease losses is maintained at a level believed to be appropriate by the Company to absorb probable losses inherent in the loan and lease portfolio. The determination of the reserve requires significant judgment reflecting the Company’s best estimate of probable loan and lease losses related to specifically identified impaired loans and leases as well as probable losses in the remainder of the various loan and lease portfolios. For purposes of determining the reserve, the Company has segmented loans and leases into classes based on the associated risk within these segments. The Company has determined that eight classes exist within the loan and lease portfolio. The methodology for assessing the appropriateness of the reserve consists of several key elements, which include: specific reserves for impaired loans, formula reserves for each business lending division portfolio including percentage allocations for special attention loans and leases not deemed impaired, and reserves for pooled homogeneous loans and leases. The Company’s evaluation is based upon a continuing review of these portfolios, estimates of customer performance, collateral values and dispositions, and assessments of economic and geopolitical events, all of which are subject to judgment and will change.

14

SEQ.=1,FOLIO='14',FILE='C:\JMS\106756\13-13452-1\task6140188\13452-1-fp.htm',USER='106756',CD='Jul 19 23:49 2013'

Table of Contents

Changes in the reserve for loan and lease losses, segregated by class, for the three months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012 are shown below.

(Dollars in thousands) Commercial and agricultural loans Auto, light truck and environmental equipment Medium and heavy duty truck Aircraft financing Construction equipment financing Commercial real estate Residential real estate Consumer loans Total
June 30, 2013
Reserve for loan and lease losses
Balance, beginning of period $ 13,227 $ 9,330 $ 2,839 $ 33,832 $ 5,725 $ 13,921 $ 3,706 $ 1,431 $ 84,011
Charge-offs 129 — — — 5 102 77 178 491
Recoveries 132 15 15 506 39 81 5 84 877
Net charge-offs (recoveries) (3 ) (15 ) (15 ) (506 ) (34 ) 21 72 94 (386 )
Provision (recovery of provision) (1,028 ) 2,544 324 (1,015 ) 306 (371 ) 261 272 1,293
Balance, end of period $ 12,202 $ 11,889 $ 3,178 $ 33,323 $ 6,065 $ 13,529 $ 3,895 $ 1,609 $ 85,690
Ending balance, individually evaluated for impairment $ 222 $ — $ — $ 537 $ — $ — $ — $ — $ 759
Ending balance, collectively evaluated for impairment 11,980 11,889 3,178 32,786 6,065 13,529 3,895 1,609 84,931
Total reserve for loan and lease losses $ 12,202 $ 11,889 $ 3,178 $ 33,323 $ 6,065 $ 13,529 $ 3,895 $ 1,609 $ 85,690
Recorded investment in loans
Ending balance, individually evaluated for impairment $ 12,208 $ 142 $ 711 $ 4,424 $ 3,895 $ 17,293 $ — $ — $ 38,673
Ending balance, collectively evaluated for impairment 648,172 510,420 177,883 673,086 307,240 559,517 454,983 123,411 3,454,712
Total recorded investement in loans $ 660,380 $ 510,562 $ 178,594 $ 677,510 $ 311,135 $ 576,810 $ 454,983 $ 123,411 $ 3,493,385
June 30, 2012
Reserve for loan and lease losses
Balance, beginning of period $ 12,525 $ 9,769 $ 3,667 $ 28,598 $ 6,851 $ 16,326 $ 3,378 $ 1,280 $ 82,394
Charge-offs 126 867 — — — 109 32 539 1,673
Recoveries 68 75 1 196 50 45 2 86 523
Net charge-offs (recoveries) 58 792 (1 ) (196 ) (50 ) 64 30 453 1,150
Provision (recovery of provision) 610 1,323 (50 ) 1,077 (571 ) (1,090 ) 173 583 2,055
Balance, end of period $ 13,077 $ 10,300 $ 3,618 $ 29,871 $ 6,330 $ 15,172 $ 3,521 $ 1,410 $ 83,299
Ending balance, individually evaluated for impairment $ 1,073 $ 500 $ — $ 688 $ — $ 19 $ — $ — $ 2,280
Ending balance, collectively evaluated for impairment 12,004 9,800 3,618 29,183 6,330 15,153 3,521 1,410 81,019
Total reserve for loan and lease losses $ 13,077 $ 10,300 $ 3,618 $ 29,871 $ 6,330 $ 15,172 $ 3,521 $ 1,410 $ 83,299
Recorded investment in loans
Ending balance, individually evaluated for impairment $ 8,946 $ 2,643 $ 787 $ 6,308 $ 5,022 $ 23,535 $ 106 $ — $ 47,347
Ending balance, collectively evaluated for impairment 547,040 505,850 171,518 655,876 275,693 520,157 441,481 105,630 3,223,245
Total recorded investement in loans $ 555,986 $ 508,493 $ 172,305 $ 662,184 $ 280,715 $ 543,692 $ 441,587 $ 105,630 $ 3,270,592

15

SEQ.=1,FOLIO='15',FILE='C:\JMS\106756\13-13452-1\task6140188\13452-1-fp.htm',USER='106756',CD='Jul 19 23:49 2013'

Table of Contents

Changes in the reserve for loan and lease losses, segregated by class, for the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012 are shown below.

(Dollars in thousands) Commercial and agricultural loans Auto, light truck and environmental equipment Medium and heavy duty truck Aircraft financing Construction equipment financing Commercial real estate Residential real estate Consumer loans Total
June 30, 2013
Reserve for loan and lease losses
Balance, beginning of period $ 12,326 $ 9,584 $ 3,001 $ 34,205 $ 5,390 $ 13,778 $ 3,652 $ 1,375 $ 83,311
Charge-offs 414 1 — 31 88 164 154 601 1,453
Recoveries 241 138 29 684 74 410 11 195 1,782
Net charge-offs (recoveries) 173 (137 ) (29 ) (653 ) 14 (246 ) 143 406 (329 )
Provision (recovery of provision) 49 2,168 148 (1,535 ) 689 (495 ) 386 640 2,050
Balance, end of period $ 12,202 $ 11,889 $ 3,178 $ 33,323 $ 6,065 $ 13,529 $ 3,895 $ 1,609 $ 85,690
Ending balance, individually evaluated for impairment $ 222 $ — $ — $ 537 $ — $ — $ — $ — $ 759
Ending balance, collectively evaluated for impairment 11,980 11,889 3,178 32,786 6,065 13,529 3,895 1,609 84,931
Total reserve for loan and lease losses $ 12,202 $ 11,889 $ 3,178 $ 33,323 $ 6,065 $ 13,529 $ 3,895 $ 1,609 $ 85,690
Recorded investment in loans
Ending balance, individually evaluated for impairment $ 12,208 $ 142 $ 711 $ 4,424 $ 3,895 $ 17,293 $ — $ — $ 38,673
Ending balance, collectively evaluated for impairment 648,172 510,420 177,883 673,086 307,240 559,517 454,983 123,411 3,454,712
Total recorded investement in loans $ 660,380 $ 510,562 $ 178,594 $ 677,510 $ 311,135 $ 576,810 $ 454,983 $ 123,411 $ 3,493,385
June 30, 2012
Reserve for loan and lease losses
Balance, beginning of period $ 13,091 $ 8,469 $ 3,742 $ 28,626 $ 6,295 $ 16,772 $ 3,362 $ 1,287 $ 81,644
Charge-offs 272 2,900 — 139 119 142 73 795 4,440
Recoveries 164 858 22 321 84 79 34 224 1,786
Net charge-offs (recoveries) 108 2,042 (22 ) (182 ) 35 63 39 571 2,654
Provision (recovery of provision) 94 3,873 (146 ) 1,063 70 (1,537 ) 198 694 4,309
Balance, end of period $ 13,077 $ 10,300 $ 3,618 $ 29,871 $ 6,330 $ 15,172 $ 3,521 $ 1,410 $ 83,299
Ending balance, individually evaluated for impairment $ 1,073 $ 500 $ — $ 688 $ — $ 19 $ — $ — $ 2,280
Ending balance, collectively evaluated for impairment 12,004 9,800 3,618 29,183 6,330 15,153 3,521 1,410 81,019
Total reserve for loan and lease losses $ 13,077 $ 10,300 $ 3,618 $ 29,871 $ 6,330 $ 15,172 $ 3,521 $ 1,410 $ 83,299
Recorded investment in loans
Ending balance, individually evaluated for impairment $ 8,946 $ 2,643 $ 787 $ 6,308 $ 5,022 $ 23,535 $ 106 $ — $ 47,347
Ending balance, collectively evaluated for impairment 547,040 505,850 171,518 655,876 275,693 520,157 441,481 105,630 3,223,245
Total recorded investement in loans $ 555,986 $ 508,493 $ 172,305 $ 662,184 $ 280,715 $ 543,692 $ 441,587 $ 105,630 $ 3,270,592

*Note 6. Mortgage Servicing Assets*

The Company recognizes the rights to service residential mortgage loans for others as separate assets, whether the servicing rights are acquired through a separate purchase or through the sale of originated loans with servicing rights retained. The Company allocates a portion of the total proceeds of a mortgage loan to servicing rights based on the relative fair value. The unpaid principal balance of residential mortgage loans serviced for third parties was $864.41 million and $921.20 million at June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively.

16

SEQ.=1,FOLIO='16',FILE='C:\JMS\106756\13-13452-1\task6140188\13452-1-fp.htm',USER='106756',CD='Jul 19 23:49 2013'

Table of Contents

Mortgage servicing assets are evaluated for impairment at each reporting date. For purposes of impairment measurement, mortgage servicing assets are stratified based on the predominant risk characteristics of the underlying servicing, principally by loan type. If temporary impairment exists within a tranche, a valuation allowance is established through a charge to income equal to the amount by which the carrying value exceeds the fair value. If it is later determined all or a portion of the temporary impairment no longer exists for a particular tranche, the valuation allowance is reduced through a recovery of income.

Changes in the carrying value of mortgage servicing assets and the associated valuation allowance follow:

(Dollars in thousands) Three Months Ended June 30, — 2013 2012 Six Months Ended June 30, — 2013 2012
Mortgage servicing assets:
Balance at beginning of period $ 4,528 $ 5,248 $ 4,645 $ 5,610
Additions 563 572 926 902
Amortization (457 ) (836 ) (937 ) (1,528 )
Sales — — — —
Carrying value before valuation allowance at end of period 4,634 4,984 4,634 4,984
Valuation allowance:
Balance at beginning of period — (4 ) — (238 )
Impairment (charges) recoveries — (87 ) — 147
Balance at end of period $ — $ (91 ) $ — $ (91 )
Net carrying value of mortgage servicing assets at end of period $ 4,634 $ 4,893 $ 4,634 $ 4,893
Fair value of mortgage servicing assets at end of period $ 7,240 $ 5,622 $ 7,240 $ 5,622

During the six months ended June 30, 2013, the Company determined that it was not necessary to permanently write-down any previously established valuation allowance. At June 30, 2013 and 2012, the fair value of mortgage servicing assets exceeded the carrying value reported in the consolidated statement of financial condition by $2.61 million and $0.73 million, respectively. This difference represents increases in the fair value of certain mortgage servicing assets that could not be recorded above cost basis.

Mortgage loan contractual servicing fees, including late fees and ancillary income, were $0.82 million and $0.88 million for the three months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively. Mortgage loan contractual servicing fees, including late fees and ancillary income, were $1.64 million and $1.82 million for the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively. Mortgage loan contractual servicing fees are included in mortgage banking income in the consolidated statements of income.

*Note 7. Commitments and Financial Instruments with Off-Balance-Sheet Risk*

1st Source and its subsidiaries are parties to financial instruments with off-balance-sheet risk in the normal course of business. These off-balance-sheet financial instruments include commitments to originate and sell loans and standby letters of credit. The instruments involve, to varying degrees, elements of credit and interest rate risk in excess of the amount recognized in the consolidated statements of financial condition. The exposure to credit loss in the event of nonperformance by the other party to the financial instruments for loan commitments and standby letters of credit is represented by the dollar amount of those instruments. The Company uses the same credit policies and collateral requirements in making commitments and conditional obligations as it does for on-balance-sheet instruments.

1st Source Bank (Bank), a subsidiary of 1st Source Corporation, grants mortgage loan commitments to borrowers, subject to normal loan underwriting standards. The interest rate risk associated with these loan commitments is managed by entering into contracts for future deliveries of loans. Loan commitments generally have fixed expiration dates or other termination clauses and may require payment of a fee. Since many of the

17

SEQ.=1,FOLIO='17',FILE='C:\JMS\106756\13-13452-1\task6140188\13452-1-fp.htm',USER='106756',CD='Jul 19 23:49 2013'

Table of Contents

commitments are expected to expire without being drawn upon, the total commitment amounts do not necessarily represent future cash requirements.

The Bank issues letters of credit which are conditional commitments that guarantee the performance of a client to a third party. The credit risk involved and collateral obtained in issuing letters of credit is essentially the same as that involved in extending loan commitments to clients. Standby letters of credit totaled $15.20 million and $17.29 million at June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively. Standby letters of credit generally have terms ranging from six months to one year.

*Note 8. Derivative Financial Instruments*

Commitments to originate residential mortgage loans held for sale and forward commitments to sell residential mortgage loans are considered derivative instruments. See Note 7 for further information.

The Company has certain interest rate derivative positions that are not designated as hedging instruments. Derivative assets and liabilities are recorded at fair value on the balance sheet and do take into account the effects of master netting agreements. Master netting agreements allow the Company to settle all derivative contracts held with a single counterparty on a net basis, and to offset net derivative positions with related collateral, where applicable. These derivative positions relate to transactions in which the Company enters into an interest rate swap with a client while at the same time entering into an offsetting interest rate swap with another financial institution. In connection with each transaction, the Company agrees to pay interest to the client on a notional amount at a variable interest rate and receive interest from the client on the same notional amount at a fixed interest rate. At the same time, the Company agrees to pay another financial institution the same fixed interest rate on the same notional amount and receive the same variable interest rate on the same notional amount. The transaction allows the client to effectively convert a variable rate loan to a fixed rate. Because the terms of the swaps with the customers and the other financial institutions offset each other, with the only difference being counterparty credit risk, changes in the fair value of the underlying derivative contracts are not materially different and do not significantly impact the Company’s results of operations.

At June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, the amounts of non-hedging derivative financial instruments are shown in the chart below:

(Dollars in thousands) Notional or contractual amount Asset derivatives — Statement of Financial Condition classification Fair value Liability derivatives — Statement of Financial Condition classification Fair value
June 30, 2013
Interest rate swap contracts $ 423,397 Other assets $ 10,740 Other liabilities $ 10,945
Loan commitments 14,438 Mortgages held for sale 153 N/A —
Forward contracts 19,600 Mortgages held for sale 764 N/A —
Total $ 457,435 $ 11,657 $ 10,945
December 31, 2012
Interest rate swap contracts $ 446,024 Other assets $ 16,126 Other liabilities $ 16,444
Loan commitments 33,961 Mortgages held for sale 220 N/A —
Forward contracts 21,500 N/A — Mortgages held for sale 33
Total $ 501,485 $ 16,346 $ 16,477

18

SEQ.=1,FOLIO='18',FILE='C:\JMS\106756\13-13452-1\task6140188\13452-1-fp.htm',USER='106756',CD='Jul 19 23:49 2013'

Table of Contents

For the three and six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, the amounts included in the consolidated statements of income for non-hedging derivative financial instruments are shown in the chart below:

Gain (loss)
Statement of Three Months Ended June 30, Six Months Ended June 30,
(Dollars in thousands) Income classification 2013 2012 2013 2012
Interest rate swap contracts Other expense $ 83 $ 4 $ 113 $ 79
Interest rate swap contracts Other income 204 214 398 253
Loan commitments Mortgage banking income (111 ) (72 ) (67 ) 141
Forward contracts Mortgage banking income 780 (374 ) 797 (98 )
Total $ 956 $ (228 ) $ 1,241 $ 375

At June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012 the offsetting of financial assets and derivative assets are shown in the chart below:

(Dollars in thousands) Gross Amounts of — Recognized Assets Gross Amounts Offset in the — Statement of Financial Position Net Amounts of Assets Presented in — the Statement of Financial Position Gross Amounts Not Offset in the Statement of Financial Position — Financial Instruments Cash Collateral Received Net Amount
June 30, 2013
Interest Rate Swaps $ 11,523 $ 783 $ 10,740 $ — $ — $ 10,740
December 31, 2012
Interest Rate Swaps $ 17,422 $ 1,296 $ 16,126 $ — $ — $ 16,126

At June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012 the offsetting of financial liabilities and derivative liabilities are shown in the chart below:

(Dollars in thousands) Gross Amounts of — Recognized Liabilities Gross Amounts Offset in the — Statement of Financial Position Net Amounts of Liabilities Presented in — the Statement of Financial Position Gross Amounts Not Offset in the Statement of Financial Position — Financial Instruments Cash Collateral Pledged Net Amount
June 30, 2013
Interest Rate Swaps $ 11,728 $ 783 $ 10,945 $ — $ 9,984 $ 961
December 31, 2012
Interest Rate Swaps $ 17,740 $ 1,296 $ 16,444 $ — $ 15,811 $ 633

*Note 9. Earnings Per Share*

Earnings per common share is computed using the two-class method. Basic earnings per common share is computed by dividing net income available to common shareholders by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding during the applicable period, excluding outstanding participating securities. Participating securities include non-vested restricted stock awards. Non-vested restricted stock awards are considered participating securities to the extent the holders of these securities receive non-forfeitable dividends at the same rate as holders of common stock. Diluted earnings per common share is computed using the weighted-average number of shares determined for the basic earnings per common share computation plus the dilutive effect of stock compensation using the treasury stock method. Stock options, where the exercise price was greater than the average market price of the common shares, were excluded from the computation of diluted earnings per common share because the result would have been antidilutive. There were no stock options outstanding as of June 30, 2013. No stock options were considered antidilutive as of June 30, 2012.

19

SEQ.=1,FOLIO='19',FILE='C:\JMS\105569\13-13452-1\task6139510\13452-1-fr.htm',USER='105569',CD='Jul 19 16:17 2013'

Table of Contents

The following table presents a reconciliation of the number of shares used in the calculation of basic and diluted earnings per common share for the three and six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012.

(Dollars in thousands - except per share amounts) Three Months Ended June 30, — 2013 2012 Six Months Ended June 30, — 2013 2012
Distributed earnings allocated to common stock $ 4,140 $ 3,881 $ 8,283 $ 7,772
Undistributed earnings allocated to common stock 9,618 8,515 17,719 16,166
Net earnings allocated to common stock 13,758 12,396 26,002 23,938
Net earnings allocated to participating securities 184 171 344 344
Net income allocated to common stock and participating securities $ 13,942 $ 12,567 $ 26,346 $ 24,282
Weighted average shares outstanding for basic earnings per common share 24,367,529 24,263,881 24,344,882 24,261,649
Dilutive effect of stock compensation 1,444 10,017 1,171 10,774
Weighted average shares outstanding for diluted earnings per common share 24,368,973 24,273,898 24,346,053 24,272,423
Basic earnings per common share $ 0.56 $ 0.51 $ 1.07 $ 0.99
Diluted earnings per common share $ 0.56 $ 0.51 $ 1.07 $ 0.99

*Note 10. Stock Based Compensation*

As of June 30, 2013, the Company had four active stock-based employee compensation plans, which are more fully described in Note 15 of the Consolidated Financial Statements in 1st Source’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012. These plans include three executive stock award plans, namely, the Executive Incentive Plan (EIP), the Restricted Stock Award Plan, and the 1998 Performance Compensation Plan; and the Employee Stock Purchase Plan. The last outstanding grant under the 2001 Stock Option Plan was exercised in March 2013. The 2011 Stock Option Plan was approved by the shareholders on April 21, 2011 but the Company had not made any grants through June 30, 2013.

Stock-based compensation expense for all stock-based compensation awards granted is based on the grant-date fair value. For all awards except stock option awards, the grant date fair value is either the fair market value per share or book value per share (corresponding to the type of stock awarded) as of the grant date. For stock option awards, the grant date fair value is estimated using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. For all awards the Company recognizes these compensation costs only for those shares expected to vest on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period of the award, for which the Company uses the related vesting term. The Company estimates forfeiture rates based on historical employee option exercise and employee termination experience. The Company has identified separate groups of award recipients that exhibit similar option exercise behavior and employee termination experience and have considered them as separate groups in the valuation models and expense estimates.

The stock-based compensation expense recognized in the consolidated statements of income for the three and six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012 was based on awards ultimately expected to vest, and accordingly has been adjusted by the amount of estimated forfeitures. GAAP requires forfeitures to be estimated at the time of grant and revised, if necessary, in subsequent periods if actual forfeitures differ from those estimates. Forfeitures were estimated based partially on historical experience.

Total fair value of options vested and expensed was zero for the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012. As of June 30, 2013 there were no outstanding stock options. There were 7,500 stock options exercised at a

20

SEQ.=1,FOLIO='20',FILE='C:\JMS\105569\13-13452-1\task6139510\13452-1-fr.htm',USER='105569',CD='Jul 19 16:17 2013'

Table of Contents

weighted average price of $12.04 during the six months ended June 30, 2013. All shares issued in connection with stock option exercises are issued from available treasury stock.

As of June 30, 2013, there was $7.26 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to non-vested share-based compensation arrangements. That cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 3.37 years.

*Note 11. Income Taxes*

The total amount of unrecognized tax benefits that would affect the effective tax rate if recognized was $2.19 million at June 30, 2013 and $2.02 million at December 31, 2012. Interest and penalties were recognized through the income tax provision. For the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, the Company recognized approximately $0.10 million and $(0.04) million in interest, net of tax effect, and penalties, respectively. Interest and penalties of approximately $0.65 million and $0.55 million were accrued at June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively.

Effective January 1, 2014, the Indiana Financial Institutions tax rate decreases from 8.5% to 8.0% and continues to decrease by 0.5% each of the next three years. As a result of the rate change, the Company decreased the carrying value of certain state deferred tax assets. The impact of this change was not material and was recorded in the financial statements during the second quarter of 2013.

Tax years that remain open and subject to audit include the federal 2009-2012 years and the Indiana 2009-2012 years. The Company does not anticipate a significant change in the amount of uncertain tax positions within the next 12 months.

*Note 12. Fair Value Measurements*

The Company records certain assets and liabilities at fair value. Fair value is defined as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. Fair value measurements are also utilized to determine the initial value of certain assets and liabilities, to perform impairment assessments, and for disclosure purposes. The Company uses quoted market prices and observable inputs to the maximum extent possible when measuring fair value. In the absence of quoted market prices, various valuation techniques are utilized to measure fair value. When possible, observable market data for identical or similar financial instruments is used in the valuation. When market data is not available, fair value is determined using valuation models that incorporate management’s estimates of the assumptions a market participant would use in pricing the asset or liability.

Fair value measurements are classified within one of three levels based on the observability of the inputs used to determine fair value, as follows:

· Level 1 — The valuation is based on quoted prices in active markets for identical instruments.

· Level 2 — The valuation is based on observable inputs such as quoted prices for similar instruments in active markets, quoted prices for identical or similar instruments in markets that are not active, and model-based valuation techniques for which all significant assumptions are observable in the market.

· Level 3 — The valuation is based on unobservable inputs that are supported by minimal or no market activity and that are significant to the fair value of the instrument. Level 3 valuations are typically performed using pricing models, discounted cash flow methodologies, or similar techniques that

21

SEQ.=1,FOLIO='21',FILE='C:\JMS\105569\13-13452-1\task6139510\13452-1-fr.htm',USER='105569',CD='Jul 19 16:17 2013'

Table of Contents

incorporate management’s own estimates of assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the instrument, or valuations that require significant management judgment or estimation.

A financial instrument’s level within the fair value hierarchy is based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement.

The Company elected fair value accounting for mortgages held for sale. The Company believes the election for mortgages held for sale (which are economically hedged with free standing derivatives) will reduce certain timing differences and better match changes in the value of these assets with changes in the value of derivatives used as economic hedges for these assets. At June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, all mortgages held for sale were carried at fair value.

The following table reflects the differences between the fair value carrying amount of mortgages held for sale measured at fair value and the aggregate unpaid principal amount the Company is contractually entitled to receive at maturity on June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012:

(Dollars in thousands) Fair value carrying amount Aggregate unpaid principal Excess of fair value carrrying amount over (under) unpaid principal
June 30, 2013
Mortgages held for sale reported at fair value
Total Loans $ 10,849 $ 10,161 $ 688 (1)
December 31, 2012
Mortgages held for sale reported at fair value
Total Loans $ 10,879 $ 10,293 $ 586 (1)

(1) The excess of fair value carrying amount over unpaid principal is included in mortgage banking income and includes changes in fair value at and subsequent to funding, gains and losses on the related loan commitment prior to funding and premiums on acquired loans.

**Financial Instruments on Recurring Basis:****

The following is a description of the valuation methodologies used for financial instruments measured at fair value on a recurring basis:

Investment securities available for sale are valued primarily by a third party pricing agent. Prices supplied by the independent pricing agent, as well as their pricing methodologies and assumptions, are reviewed by the Company for reasonableness and to ensure such prices are aligned with market levels. In general, the Company’s investment securities do not possess a complex structure that could introduce greater valuation risk. The portfolio mainly consists of traditional investments including U.S. Treasury and Federal agencies securities, federal agency mortgage pass-through securities, and general obligation and revenue municipal bonds. Pricing for such instruments is fairly generic and is easily obtained. On a quarterly basis, prices supplied by the pricing agent are validated by comparison to prices obtained from other third party sources for a material portion of the portfolio.

The valuation policy and procedures for Level 3 fair value measurements of available for sale debt securities are decided through collaboration between management of the Corporate Accounting and Funds Management departments. The changes in fair value measurement for Level 3 securities are analyzed on a periodic basis under a collaborative framework with the aforementioned departments. The methodology and variables used

22

SEQ.=1,FOLIO='22',FILE='C:\JMS\105569\13-13452-1\task6139510\13452-1-fr.htm',USER='105569',CD='Jul 19 16:17 2013'

Table of Contents

for input are derived from the combination of observable and unobservable inputs. The unobservable inputs are determined through internal assumptions that may vary from period to period due to external factors, such as market movement and credit rating adjustments.

Both the market and income valuation approaches are implemented using the following types of inputs:

· U.S. treasuries are priced using the market approach and utilizing live data feeds from active market exchanges for identical securities.

· Government-sponsored agency debt securities and corporate bonds are primarily priced using available market information through processes such as benchmark curves, market valuations of like securities, sector groupings and matrix pricing.

· Other government-sponsored agency securities, mortgage-backed securities and some of the actively traded REMICs and CMOs, are primarily priced using available market information including benchmark yields, prepayment speeds, spreads and volatility of similar securities.

· Other inactive government-sponsored agency securities are primarily priced using consensus pricing and dealer quotes.

· State and political subdivisions are largely grouped by characteristics, i.e., geographical data and source of revenue in trade dissemination systems. Since some securities are not traded daily and due to other grouping limitations, active market quotes are often obtained using benchmarking for like securities. Local direct placement municipal securities, with very little market activity, are priced using an appropriate market yield curve.

· Marketable equity (common) securities are primarily priced using the market approach and utilizing live data feeds from active market exchanges for identical securities.

Trading account securities are priced using the market approach and utilizing live data feeds from active market exchanges for identical securities.

Mortgages held for sale and the related loan commitments and forward contracts (hedges) are valued using a market value approach and utilizing an appropriate current market yield and a loan commitment closing rate based on historical analysis.

Interest rate swap positions, both assets and liabilities, are valued by a third party pricing agent using an income approach and utilizing models that use as their basis readily observable market parameters. This valuation process considers various factors including interest rate yield curves, time value and volatility factors. Validation of third party agent valuations is accomplished by comparing those values to the Company’s swap counterparty valuations. Management believes an adjustment is required to “mid-market” valuations for derivatives tied to its performing loan portfolio to recognize the imprecision and related exposure inherent in the process of estimating expected credit losses as well as velocity of deterioration evident with systemic risks imbedded in these portfolios.

23

SEQ.=1,FOLIO='23',FILE='C:\JMS\105569\13-13452-1\task6139510\13452-1-fr.htm',USER='105569',CD='Jul 19 16:17 2013'

Table of Contents

The table below presents the balance of assets and liabilities at June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012 measured at fair value on a recurring basis:

(Dollars in thousands) Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Total
June 30, 2013
Assets:
Investment securities available-for-sale:
U.S. Treasury and Federal agencies securities $ 19,567 $ 373,073 $ — $ 392,640
U.S. States and political subdivisions securities — 101,186 5,452 106,638
Mortgage-backed securities — Federal agencies — 291,222 — 291,222
Corporate debt securities — 28,331 — 28,331
Foreign government and other securities — 2,708 — 2,708
Total debt securities 19,567 796,520 5,452 821,539
Marketable equity securities 6,773 — — 6,773
Total investment securities available-for-sale 26,340 796,520 5,452 828,312
Trading account securities 166 — — 166
Mortgages held for sale — 10,849 — 10,849
Accrued income and other assets (Interest rate swap agreements) — 10,740 — 10,740
Total $ 26,506 $ 818,109 $ 5,452 $ 850,067
Liabilities:
Accrued expenses and other liabilities (Interest rate swap agreements) $ — $ 10,945 $ — $ 10,945
Total $ — $ 10,945 $ — $ 10,945
December 31, 2012
Assets:
Investment securities available-for-sale:
U.S. Treasury and Federal agencies securities $ 20,063 $ 402,190 $ — $ 422,253
U.S. States and political subdivisions securities — 97,736 7,701 105,437
Mortgage-backed securities — Federal agencies — 312,407 — 312,407
Corporate debt securities — 31,248 — 31,248
Foreign government and other securities — 3,726 — 3,726
Total debt securities 20,063 847,307 7,701 875,071
Marketable equity securities 5,693 — — 5,693
Total investment securities available-for-sale 25,756 847,307 7,701 880,764
Trading account securities 146 — — 146
Mortgages held for sale — 10,879 — 10,879
Accrued income and other assets (Interest rate swap agreements) — 16,126 — 16,126
Total $ 25,902 $ 874,312 $ 7,701 $ 907,915
Liabilities:
Accrued expenses and other liabilities (Interest rate swap agreements) $ — $ 16,444 $ — $ 16,444
Total $ — $ 16,444 $ — $ 16,444

24

SEQ.=1,FOLIO='24',FILE='C:\JMS\105569\13-13452-1\task6139510\13452-1-fr.htm',USER='105569',CD='Jul 19 16:17 2013'

Table of Contents

The changes in Level 3 assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis for the quarter ended June 30, 2013 and 2012 are summarized as follows:

(Dollars in thousands) U.S. States and political subdivisions securities Foreign government and other securities Investment securities available- for-sale
Beginning balance April 1, 2013 $ 7,070 $ — $ 7,070
Total gains or losses (realized/unrealized):
Included in earnings — — —
Included in other comprehensive income 182 — 182
Purchases — — —
Issuances — — —
Settlements — — —
Maturities (1,800 ) — (1,800 )
Transfers into Level 3 — — —
Transfers out of Level 3 — — —
Ending balance June 30, 2013 $ 5,452 $ — $ 5,452
Beginning balance April 1, 2012 $ 9,934 $ — $ 9,934
Total gains or losses (realized/unrealized):
Included in earnings — — —
Included in other comprehensive income 209 — 209
Purchases — — —
Issuances — — —
Settlements — — —
Maturities (2,000 ) — (2,000 )
Transfers into Level 3 — — —
Transfers out of Level 3 — — —
Ending balance June 30, 2012 $ 8,143 $ — $ 8,143

There were no gains or losses for the period included in earnings attributable to the change in unrealized gains or losses relating to assets and liabilities still held at June 30, 2013 or 2012. No transfers between levels occurred during the six months ended June 30, 2013. One transfer between levels occurred during the six months ended June 30, 2012. No transfers between Level 1 and 2 occurred during the period ended June 30, 2013. A foreign government debt security was transferred from Level 3 to Level 2 as of March 31, 2012 due to the Company’s periodic review of valuation methodologies and inputs. The Company determined that the observable inputs used in determining fair value warranted a transfer to Level 2 as the unobservable inputs were deemed to be insignificant to the overall fair value measurement.

25

SEQ.=1,FOLIO='25',FILE='C:\JMS\106756\13-13452-1\task6140188\13452-1-ft.htm',USER='106756',CD='Jul 19 23:50 2013'

Table of Contents

The table below presents the valuation methodology and unobservable inputs for Level 3 assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis at June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012.

(Dollars in thousands) Fair Value Valuation — Methodology Unobservable Inputs Range of Inputs
June 30, 2013
Investment securities available-for sale
Adjustable rate securities $ 1,690 Discounted cash flows Illiquidity adjustment 4.00% - 8.00%
Term assumption (1) 5 yrs
Coupon forecast assumption 0.37%
Direct placement municipal securities 3,762 Discounted cash flows Credit spread assumption 1.27% - 2.31%
Total investment securities available-for-sale $ 5,452
December 31, 2012
Investment securities available-for sale
Adjustable rate securities $ 3,364 Discounted cash flows Illiquidity adjustment 4.00% - 8.00%
Term assumption (1) 5 yrs
Coupon forecast assumption 0.50% - 0.88%
Direct placement municipal securities 4,337 Discounted cash flows Credit spread assumption 1.22% - 1.95%
Total investment securities available-for-sale $ 7,701

(1) Term assumption is influenced by security call history

The sensitivity to changes in the unobservable inputs and their impact on the fair value measurement can be significant. The significant unobservable inputs for adjustable rate securities are illiquidity, term and coupon forecast assumptions. The illiquidity adjustment is negatively correlated to the fair value measure. An increase (decrease) in the determined illiquidity adjustment will lower (increase) the fair value measure. The term assumption is negatively correlated to the fair value measure. An increase (decrease) in the determined term adjustment will decrease (increase) the fair value measure. The coupon forecast is positively correlated to the fair value measure. An increase (decrease) in the determined coupon forecast will increase (decrease) the fair value measure. A permutation that includes a change in the coupon forecast with a change in either or both of the two variables will mitigate the significance of the change to the fair value measure. The significant unobservable input for direct placement municipal securities is the underlying market level used to determine the fair value measure. An increase (decrease) in the estimated yield level of the market will decrease (increase) the fair value measure of the securities.

**Financial Instruments on Non-recurring Basis:****

The Company may be required, from time to time, to measure certain other financial assets at fair value on a non-recurring basis in accordance with GAAP. These adjustments to fair value usually result from application of lower of cost or market accounting or impairment charges of individual assets.

The Credit Policy Committee, a management committee, is responsible for overseeing the valuation processes and procedures for Level 3 measurements of impaired loans, other real estate and repossessions. The

26

SEQ.=1,FOLIO='26',FILE='C:\JMS\106756\13-13452-1\task6140188\13452-1-ft.htm',USER='106756',CD='Jul 19 23:50 2013'

Table of Contents

Committee reviews these assets on a quarterly basis to determine the accuracy of the observable inputs, generally third party appraisals, auction values, values derived from trade publications and data submitted by the borrower, and the appropriateness of the unobservable inputs, generally discounts due to current market conditions and collection issues. The Committee establishes discounts based on asset type and valuation source; deviations from the standard are documented. The discounts are reviewed periodically, annually at a minimum, to determine they remain appropriate. Consideration is given to current trends in market values for the asset categories and gain and losses on sales of similar assets. The Loan and Funds Management Committee of the Board of Directors is responsible for overseeing the Credit Policy Committee.

Discounts range from 10% to 90% depending on the nature of the assets and the source of value. Aircraft are generally valued using quarterly trade publications adjusted for engine time, condition, maintenance programs, discounted by 10%. Likewise, autos are valued using current auction values, discounted by 10%; medium and heavy duty trucks are valued using trade publications and auction values, discounted by 15%. Construction equipment and environmental equipment is generally valued using trade publications and auction values, discounted by 20%. Real estate is valued based on appraisals or evaluations, discounted by 20% at a minimum with higher discounts for property in poor condition or property with characteristics which may make it more difficult to market. Commercial loans subject to borrowing base certificates are generally discounted by 20% for receivables and 40% - 75% for inventory with higher discounts when monthly borrowing base certificates are not required or received.

Impaired loans and related write-downs are based on the fair value of the underlying collateral if repayment is expected solely from the collateral. Collateral values are reviewed quarterly and estimated using customized discounting criteria, appraisals and dealer and trade magazine quotes which are used in a market valuation approach. In accordance with fair value measurements, only impaired loans for which a reserve for loan loss has been established based on the fair value collateral require classification in the fair value hierarchy. As a result, only a portion of the Company’s impaired loans are classified in the fair value hierarchy.

Partnership investments and the adjustments to fair value primarily result from application of lower of cost or fair value accounting. The partnership investments are priced using financial statements provided by the partnerships. Quantitative unobservable inputs are not reasonably available for reporting purposes.

The Company has established mortgage servicing rights (MSRs) valuation policies and procedures based on industry standards and to ensure valuation methodologies are consistent and verifiable. MSRs and related adjustments to fair value result from application of lower of cost or fair value accounting. For purposes of impairment, MSRs are stratified based on the predominant risk characteristics of the underlying servicing, principally by loan type. The fair value of each tranche of the servicing portfolio is estimated by calculating the present value of estimated future net servicing cash flows, taking into consideration actual and expected mortgage loan prepayment rates, discount rates, servicing costs, and other economic factors. Prepayment rates and discount rates are derived through a third party pricing agent. Changes in the most significant inputs, including prepayment rates and discount rates, are compared to the changes in the fair value measurements and appropriate resolution is made. A fair value analysis is also obtained from an independent third party agent and compared to the internal valuation for reasonableness. MSRs do not trade in an active, open market with readily observable prices and though sales of MSRs do occur, precise terms and conditions typically are not readily available and the characteristics of the Company’s servicing portfolio may differ from those of any servicing portfolios that do trade.

Other real estate is based on the lower of cost or fair value of the underlying collateral less expected selling costs. Collateral values are estimated primarily using appraisals and reflect a market value approach. Fair values are reviewed quarterly and new appraisals are obtained annually. Repossessions are similarly valued.

27

SEQ.=1,FOLIO='27',FILE='C:\JMS\106756\13-13452-1\task6140188\13452-1-ft.htm',USER='106756',CD='Jul 19 23:50 2013'

Table of Contents

For assets measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis the following represents impairment charges (recoveries) recognized on these assets during the quarter ended June 30, 2013: impaired loans - $0.00 million; partnership investments - $(0.05) million; mortgage servicing rights - $0.00 million; repossessions - $0.00 million, and other real estate - $0.17 million.

The table below presents the carrying value of assets at June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012 measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis:

(Dollars in thousands) Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Total
June 30, 2013
Impaired loans - collateral based $ — $ — $ 3,550 $ 3,550
Accrued income and other assets (partnership investments) — — 2,252 2,252
Accrued income and other assets (mortgage servicing rights) — — 4,634 4,634
Accrued income and other assets (repossessions) — — 137 137
Accrued income and other assets (other real estate) — — 6,406 6,406
Total $ — $ — $ 16,979 $ 16,979
December 31, 2012
Impaired loans - collateral based $ — $ — $ 2,027 $ 2,027
Accrued income and other assets (partnership investments) — — 2,032 2,032
Accrued income and other assets (mortgage servicing rights) — — 4,645 4,645
Accrued income and other assets (repossessions) — — 63 63
Accrued income and other assets (other real estate) — — 5,344 5,344
Total $ — $ — $ 14,111 $ 14,111

28

SEQ.=1,FOLIO='28',FILE='C:\JMS\106756\13-13452-1\task6140188\13452-1-ft.htm',USER='106756',CD='Jul 19 23:50 2013'

Table of Contents

The table below presents the valuation methodology and unobservable inputs for Level 3 assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis at June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012.

(Dollars in thousands) Carrying Value Fair Value Valuation Methodology Unobservable Inputs Range of Inputs
June 30, 2013
Impaired loans $ 3,550 $ 3,550 Collateral based measurements including appraisals, trade publications, auction values Discount for lack of marketability and current conditions 10% - 90%
Mortgage servicing rights 4,634 7,240 Discounted cash flows Constant prepayment rate (CPR) 10.9% - 15.2%
Discount rate 9.75% - 12.75%
Repossessions 137 167 Appraisals, trade publications and auction values Discount for lack of marketability 0% - 9%
Other real estate 6,406 7,282 Appraisals Discount for lack of marketability 0% - 74%
December 31, 2012
Impaired loans $ 2,027 $ 2,027 Collateral based measurements including appraisals, trade publications, auction values Discount for lack of marketability and current conditions 10% - 90%
Mortgage servicing rights 4,645 5,760 Discounted cash flows Constant prepayment rate (CPR) 14.1% - 23.2%
Discount rate 8.5% - 11.5%
Repossessions 63 59 Appraisals, trade publications and auction values Discount for lack of marketability 0% - 45%
Other real estate 5,344 6,550 Appraisals Discount for lack of marketability 0% - 68%

GAAP requires disclosure of the fair value of financial assets and financial liabilities, including those financial assets and financial liabilities that are not measured and reported at fair value on a recurring or non-recurring basis.

29

SEQ.=1,FOLIO='29',FILE='C:\JMS\106756\13-13452-1\task6140188\13452-1-ft.htm',USER='106756',CD='Jul 19 23:50 2013'

Table of Contents

The fair values of the Company’s financial instruments as of June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012 are summarized in the table below.

(Dollars in thousands) Carrying or — Contract Value Fair Value Level 1 Level 2 Level 3
June 30, 2013
Assets:
Cash and due from banks $ 64,850 $ 64,850 $ 64,850 $ — $ —
Federal funds sold and interest bearing deposits with other banks 3,171 3,171 3,171 — —
Investment securities, available-for-sale 828,312 828,312 26,340 796,520 5,452
Other investments and trading account securities 22,575 22,575 22,575 — —
Mortgages held for sale 10,849 10,849 — 10,849 —
Loans and leases, net of reserve for loan and lease losses 3,407,695 3,424,533 — — 3,424,533
Cash surrender value of life insurance policies 57,552 57,552 57,552 — —
Mortgage servicing rights 4,634 7,240 — — 7,240
Interest rate swaps 10,740 10,740 — 10,740 —
Liabilities:
Deposits $ 3,700,799 $ 3,710,100 $ 2,617,578 $ 1,092,522 $ —
Short-term borrowings 201,904 201,904 167,017 34,887 —
Long-term debt and mandatorily redeemable securities 58,216 57,448 — 57,448 —
Subordinated notes 58,764 70,774 — 70,774 —
Interest rate swaps 10,945 10,945 — 10,945 —
Off-balance-sheet instruments * — 165 — 165 —
December 31, 2012
Assets:
Cash and due from banks $ 83,232 $ 83,232 $ 83,232 $ — $ —
Federal funds sold and interest bearing deposits with other banks 702 702 702 — —
Investment securities, available-for-sale 880,764 880,764 25,756 847,307 7,701
Other investments and trading account securities 22,755 22,755 22,755 — —
Mortgages held for sale 10,879 10,879 — 10,879 —
Loans and leases, net of reserve for loan and lease losses 3,244,242 3,287,976 — — 3,287,976
Cash surrender value of life insurance policies 56,572 56,572 56,572 — —
Mortgage servicing rights 4,645 5,760 — — 5,760
Interest rate swaps 16,126 16,126 — 16,126 —
Liabilities:
Deposits $ 3,624,347 $ 3,641,280 $ 2,556,122 $ 1,085,158 $ —
Short-term borrowings 169,188 169,188 161,138 8,050 —
Long-term debt and mandatorily redeemable securities 71,021 71,557 — 71,557 —
Subordinated notes 58,764 72,914 — 72,914 —
Interest rate swaps 16,444 16,444 — 16,444 —
Off-balance-sheet instruments * — 188 — 188 —
  • Represents estimated cash outflows required to currently settle the obligations at current market rates.

30

SEQ.=1,FOLIO='30',FILE='C:\JMS\106756\13-13452-1\task6140188\13452-1-ft.htm',USER='106756',CD='Jul 19 23:50 2013'

Table of Contents

The methodologies for estimating fair value of financial assets and financial liabilities that are measured at fair value on a recurring or non-recurring basis are discussed above. The estimated fair value approximates carrying value for cash and due from banks, federal funds sold and interest bearing deposits with other banks, other investments, and cash surrender value of life insurance policies. The methodologies for other financial assets and financial liabilities are discussed below:

*Loans and Leases* — For variable rate loans and leases that reprice frequently and with no significant change in credit risk, fair values are based on carrying values. The fair values of other loans and leases are estimated using discounted cash flow analyses which use interest rates currently being offered for loans and leases with similar terms to borrowers of similar credit quality.

*Deposits* — The fair values for all deposits other than time deposits are equal to the amounts payable on demand (the carrying value). Fair values of variable rate time deposits are equal to their carrying values. Fair values for fixed rate time deposits are estimated using discounted cash flow analyses using interest rates currently being offered for deposits with similar remaining maturities.

*Short-Term Borrowings* — The carrying values of Federal funds purchased, securities sold under repurchase agreements, and other short-term borrowings, including the liability related to mortgage loans available for repurchase under GNMA optional repurchase programs, approximate their fair values.

*Long-Term Debt and Mandatorily Redeemable Securities* — The fair values of long-term debt are estimated using discounted cash flow analyses, based on the current estimated incremental borrowing rates for similar types of borrowing arrangements. The carrying values of mandatorily redeemable securities are based on the current estimated cost of redeeming these securities which approximate their fair values.

*Subordinated Notes* — Fair values are based on quoted market prices, where available. If quoted market prices are not available, fair values are estimated based on calculated market prices of comparable securities.

*Off-Balance-Sheet Instruments* — Contract and fair values for certain off-balance-sheet financial instruments (guarantees) are estimated based on fees currently charged to enter into similar agreements, taking into account the remaining terms of the agreements and the counterparties’ credit standing.

*Limitations* — Fair value estimates are made at a specific point in time based on relevant market information and information about the financial instruments. Because no market exists for a significant portion of the financial instruments, fair value estimates are based on judgments regarding future expected loss experience, current economic conditions, risk characteristics of various financial instruments, and other such factors.

These estimates do not reflect any premium or discount that could result from offering for sale at one time the Company’s entire holdings of a particular financial instrument. These estimates are subjective in nature and require considerable judgment to interpret market data. Accordingly, the estimates presented herein are not necessarily indicative of the amounts the Company could realize in a current market exchange, nor are they intended to represent the fair value of 1st Source as a whole. The use of different market assumptions and/or estimation methodologies may have a material effect on the estimated fair value amounts. The fair value estimates presented herein are based on pertinent information available to management as of the respective balance sheet date. Although the Company is not aware of any factors that would significantly affect the estimated fair value amounts, such amounts have not been comprehensively revalued since the presentation dates, and therefore, estimates of fair value after the balance sheet date may differ significantly from the amounts presented herein.

31

SEQ.=1,FOLIO='31',FILE='C:\JMS\106756\13-13452-1\task6140188\13452-1-ft.htm',USER='106756',CD='Jul 19 23:50 2013'

Table of Contents

Other significant assets, such as premises and equipment, other assets, and liabilities not defined as financial instruments, are not included in the above disclosures. Also, the fair value estimates for deposits do not include the benefit that results from the low-cost funding provided by the deposit liabilities compared to the cost of borrowing funds in the market.

*ITEM 2.*

*MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF*

*FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS*

The following management’s discussion and analysis is presented to provide information concerning 1st Source Corporation and its subsidiaries’ (collectively referred to as “the Company”, “we”, and “our”) financial condition as of June 30, 2013, as compared to December 31, 2012, and the results of operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012. This discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with our consolidated financial statements and the financial and statistical data appearing elsewhere in this report and our 2012 Annual Report.

Except for historical information contained herein, the matters discussed in this document express “forward-looking statements.” Generally, the words “believe,” “contemplate,” “seek,” “plan,” “possible,” “assume,” “expect,” “intend,” “targeted,” “continue,” “remain,” “estimate,” “anticipate,” “project,” “will,” “should,” “indicate,” “would,” “may” and other similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements but are not the exclusive means of identifying such statements. Those statements, including statements, projections, estimates or assumptions concerning future events or performance, and other statements that are other than statements of historical fact, are subject to material risks and uncertainties. We caution readers not to place undue reliance on any forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date made. We may make other written or oral forward-looking statements from time to time. Readers are advised that various important factors could cause our actual results or circumstances for future periods to differ materially from those anticipated or projected in such forward-looking statements. Such factors include, but are not limited to, changes in law, regulations or U.S. generally accepted accounting principles; our competitive position within the markets we serve; increasing consolidation within the banking industry; unforeseen changes in interest rates; unforeseen changes in loan prepayment assumptions; unforeseen downturns in or major events affecting the local, regional or national economies or the industries in which we have credit concentrations; and other matters discussed in our filings with the SEC, including our Annual Report on Form 10-K for 2012, which filings are available from the SEC. We undertake no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements.

*FINANCIAL CONDITION*

Our total assets at June 30, 2013 were $4.64 billion, an increase of $88.12 million or 1.94% from December 31, 2012. Total loans and leases were $3.49 billion, an increase of $165.83 million or 4.98% from December 31, 2012. Total investment securities, available for sale were $828.31 million which represented a decrease of $52.45 million or 5.96% and total deposits were $3.70 billion, an increase of $76.45 million or 2.11% over the comparable figures at the end of 2012. Short-term borrowings were $201.90 million, an increase of $32.72 million or 19.34% from December 31, 2012.

Nonperforming assets at June 30, 2013 were $36.05 million, which was a decrease of $6.22 million or 14.72% from the $42.27 million reported at December 31, 2012. At June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, nonperforming assets were 1.01% and 1.25%, respectively of net loans and leases.

32

SEQ.=1,FOLIO='32',FILE='C:\jms\106747\13-13452-1\task6142645\13452-1-ga.htm',USER='106747',CD='Jul 22 20:06 2013'

Table of Contents

Accrued income and other assets were as follows:

June 30, December 31,
(Dollars in thousands) 2013 2012
Accrued income and other assets:
Bank owned life insurance cash surrender value $ 57,552 $ 56,572
Accrued interest receivable 13,610 12,698
Mortgage servicing assets 4,634 4,645
Other real estate 5,455 4,311
Former bank premises held for sale 951 1,034
Repossessions 137 63
All other assets 33,222 44,105
Total accrued income and other assets $ 115,561 $ 123,428

*CAPITAL*

As of June 30, 2013, total shareholders’ equity was $567.75 million, up $9.10 million or 1.63% from the $558.66 million at December 31, 2012. In addition to net income of $26.35 million, other significant changes in shareholders’ equity during the first six months of 2013 included $8.35 million of dividends paid. The accumulated other comprehensive income/(loss) component of shareholders’ equity totaled $7.84 million at June 30, 2013, compared to $19.54 million at December 31, 2012. The decrease in accumulated other comprehensive income/(loss) during 2013 was the result of changes in unrealized gain/(loss) on securities in the available-for-sale portfolio. Our equity-to-assets ratio was 12.24% as of June 30, 2013, compared to 12.28% at December 31, 2012. Book value per common share rose to $23.29 at June 30, 2013, from $23.04 at December 31, 2012.

We declared and paid dividends per common share of $0.17 during the second quarter of 2013. The trailing four quarters dividend payout ratio, representing dividends per common share divided by diluted earnings per common share, was 32.54%. The dividend payout is continually reviewed by management and the Board of Directors subject to the Company’s capital and dividend policy.

The banking regulators have established guidelines for leverage capital requirements, expressed in terms of Tier 1 or core capital as a percentage of average assets, to measure the soundness of a financial institution. In addition, banking regulators have established risk-based capital guidelines for U.S. banking organizations. The actual capital amounts and ratios of 1st Source Corporation and 1st Source Bank as of June 30, 2013, are presented in the table below:

(Dollars in thousands) Actual — Amount Ratio Minimum Capital Adequacy — Amount Ratio Capitalized Under Prompt Corrective Action Provisions — Amount Ratio
Total Capital (to Risk-Weighted Assets):
1st Source Corporation $ 578,991 15.55 % $ 297,840 8.00 % $ 372,300 10.00 %
1st Source Bank 551,122 14.84 297,143 8.00 371,429 10.00
Tier 1 Capital (to Risk-Weighted Assets):
1st Source Corporation 529,963 14.23 148,920 4.00 223,380 6.00
1st Source Bank 503,496 13.56 148,572 4.00 222,858 6.00
Tier 1 Capital (to Average Assets):
1st Source Corporation 529,963 11.76 180,244 4.00 225,305 5.00
1st Source Bank 503,496 11.20 179,895 4.00 224,869 5.00

33

SEQ.=1,FOLIO='33',FILE='C:\jms\106747\13-13452-1\task6142645\13452-1-ga.htm',USER='106747',CD='Jul 22 20:06 2013'

Table of Contents

In July of 2013, the Federal Reserve and other federal banking agencies issued the final Basel III rule to help ensure that banks maintain strong capital positions. Under the final rule, minimum requirements increase for both the quantity and quality of capital held by banking organizations. The rule includes a new minimum ratio of common equity tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets of 4.5% and a common equity tier 1 capital conservation buffer of 2.5% of risk-weighted assets that apply to all supervised financial institutions. The rule also raises the minimum ratio of tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets from 4.0% to 6.0% and includes a minimum leverage ratio of 4.0% for all banking organizations. These new standards will become effective for the us on January 1, 2015.

*LIQUIDITY AND INTEREST RATE SENSITIVITY*

Effective liquidity management ensures that the cash flow requirements of depositors and borrowers, as well as our operating cash needs are met. Funds are available from a number of sources, including the securities portfolio, the core deposit base, Federal Home Loan Bank (FHLB) borrowings, Federal Reserve Bank (FRB) borrowings, and the capability to package loans for sale.

We have borrowing sources available to supplement deposits and meet our funding needs. 1st Source Bank has established relationships with several banks to provide short term borrowings in the form of federal funds purchased. At June 30, 2013 we had $52.00 million outstanding and could borrow approximately $213.00 million for a short time from these banks on a collective basis. As of June 30, 2013, we had $62.72 million outstanding in FHLB advances and could borrow an additional $132.97 million. We also had $343.22 million available to borrow from the FRB with no amounts outstanding as of June, 2013.

Our loan to asset ratio was 75.31% at June 30, 2013 compared to 73.12% at December 31, 2012 and 72.90% at June 30, 2012. Cash and cash equivalents totaled $68.02 million at June 30, 2013 compared to $83.93 million at December 31, 2012 and $90.08 million at June 30, 2012. At June 30, 2013, the consolidated statement of financial condition was rate sensitive by $318.11 million more assets than liabilities scheduled to reprice within one year, or approximately 1.16%. Management believes that the present funding sources provide adequate liquidity to meet our cash flow needs.

Under Indiana law governing the collateralization of public fund deposits, the Indiana Board of Depositories determines which financial institutions are required to pledge collateral based on the strength of their financial ratings. We have been informed that no collateral is required for our public fund deposits. However, the Board of Depositories could alter this requirement in the future and adversely impact our liquidity. Our potential liquidity exposure if we must pledge collateral is approximately $631 million.

*RESULTS OF OPERATIONS*

Net income for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2013 was $13.94 million and $26.35 million, compared to $12.57 million and $24.28 million for the same periods in 2012. Diluted net income per common share was $0.56 and $1.07 for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2013, compared to $0.51 and $0.99 for the same periods in 2012. Return on average common shareholders’ equity was 9.32% for the six months ended June 30, 2013, compared to 9.10% in 2012. The return on total average assets was 1.16% for the six months ended June 30, 2013, compared to 1.10% in 2012.

The increase in net income for the six months ended June 30, 2013, over the first six months of 2012, was primarily the result of decreases in provision for loan and lease losses and noninterest expense. Details of the changes in the various components of net income are discussed further below.

34

SEQ.=1,FOLIO='34',FILE='C:\jms\106747\13-13452-1\task6142645\13452-1-ga.htm',USER='106747',CD='Jul 22 20:06 2013'

Table of Contents

*NET INTEREST INCOME*

The taxable equivalent net interest income for the three months ended June 30, 2013 was $39.32 million, an increase of 2.15% over the same period in 2012. The net interest margin on a fully taxable equivalent basis was 3.65% for the three months ended June 30, 2013, compared to 3.70% for the three months ended June 30, 2012. The taxable equivalent net interest income for the six months ended June 30, 2013 was $77.54 million, an increase of 1.47% over 2012, resulting in a net yield of 3.64% compared to a net yield of 3.74% for the same period in 2012.

During the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2013, average earning assets increased $146.25 million or 3.50% and $180.09 million or 4.38% respectively, over the comparable periods in 2012. Average interest-bearing liabilities increased $33.95 million or 1.04% and $60.35 million or 1.87% respectively, for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2013 over the comparable periods one year ago. The yield on average earning assets decreased 27 basis points to 4.18% for the second quarter of 2013 from 4.45% for the second quarter of 2012. The yield on average earning assets for the six month period ended June 30, 2013 decreased 30 basis points to 4.20% from 4.50% for the six month period ended June 30, 2012. The rate earned on assets decreased due to the reduction in loan and investment yields in the current interest rate environment. Total cost of average interest-bearing liabilities decreased 25 basis points to 0.70% for the second quarter 2013 from 0.95% for the second quarter 2012. Total cost of average interest-bearing liabilities decreased 25 basis points to 0.73% for the six months ended June 30, 2013, from 0.98% for the six months ended June 30, 2012. The result to the net interest margin, or the ratio of net interest income to average earning assets, was a decrease of 5 basis points and 10 basis points, respectively for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2013 from June 30, 2012.

The largest contributor to the decrease in the yield on average earning assets for the six months ended June 30, 2013, compared to the six months ended June 30, 2012, was a reduction in yields on net loans and leases of 39 basis points. Average net loans and leases increased $210.18 million or 6.55% for the second quarter of 2013 from the second quarter of 2012 and $231.39 million or 7.35% for the six months ended June 30, 2013 compared to the same period in 2012. Total average investment securities decreased $40.19 million or 4.55% for the second quarter and decreased $36.47 million or 4.11% for the six month period over one year ago. Tax equivalent yield on investment securities decreased 34 basis points for the second quarter 2013. Average mortgages held for sale decreased $10.12 million or 54.70% and $5.76 million or 40.38% respectively, for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2013, over the comparable periods a year ago. Average other investments, which include federal funds sold, time deposits with other banks, Federal Reserve Bank excess balances, Federal Reserve Bank and Federal Home Loan Bank stock and commercial paper, decreased $13.62 million or 20.06% and $9.07 million or 14.27% respectively, for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2013, over the comparable periods a year ago.

Average interest-bearing deposits increased $57.22 million or 1.92% and $78.43 million or 2.66% respectively, for the second quarter of 2013 and the first six months of 2013 over the same periods in 2012. The effective rate paid on average interest-bearing deposits decreased 19 basis points to 0.58% for the second quarter 2013 compared to 0.77% for the second quarter 2012. The effective rate paid on average interest-bearing deposits decreased 18 basis points to 0.60% for the first six months of 2013 compared to 0.78% for the first six months of 2012. The decline in the average cost of interest-bearing deposits during the second quarter of 2013 and the first six months of 2013 as compared to the second quarter and first six months of 2012 was primarily the result of interest rate re-pricing on maturing certificates of deposit and a change in deposit mix.

Average short-term borrowings decreased $6.31 million or 4.32% and decreased $10.87 million or 7.74%, respectively for the second quarter of 2013 and the first six months of 2013 compared to the same periods in 2012. Interest paid on short-term borrowings was flat for the second quarter and decreased 2 basis points for

35

SEQ.=1,FOLIO='35',FILE='C:\jms\106747\13-13452-1\task6142645\13452-1-ga.htm',USER='106747',CD='Jul 22 20:06 2013'

Table of Contents

the first six months of 2013. Average subordinated notes decreased $30.93 million for the second quarter of 2013 and the first six months of 2013 while the effective rate paid decreased 19 basis points and 15 basis points, respectively due to the redemption of trust preferred securities in December 2012. Average long-term debt increased $13.96 million or 28.52% during the second quarter of 2013 as compared to the second quarter of 2012 and increased $23.72 million or 54.33% during the first six months of 2013 as compared to the first six months of 2012. The increase in long-term borrowings was mainly the result of higher borrowings with the Federal Home Loan Bank. Interest paid on long-term borrowings decreased 148 basis points for the second quarter and 165 basis points for the first six months of 2013 due to lower effective rates on Federal Home Loan Bank borrowings.

The following table provides an analysis of net interest income and illustrates the interest earned and interest expense charged for each major component of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities. Yields/rates are computed on a tax-equivalent basis, using a 35% rate. Nonaccrual loans and leases are included in the average loan and lease balance outstanding.

*DISTRIBUTION OF ASSETS, LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY*

*INTEREST RATES AND INTEREST DIFFERENTIAL*

**(Dollars in thousands)****

Three Months Ended June 30, Six Months Ended June 30,
2013 2012 2013 2012
Interest Interest Interest Interest
Average Income/ Yield/ Average Income/ Yield/ Average Income/ Yield/ Average Income/ Yield/
Balance Expense Rate Balance Expense Rate Balance Expense Rate Balance Expense Rate
ASSETS:
Investment securities:
Taxable $ 737,872 $ 3,498 1.90 % $ 775,205 $ 4,334 2.25 % $ 745,906 $ 7,193 1.94 % $ 778,594 $ 8,661 2.24 %
Tax exempt 105,998 1,122 4.25 % 108,857 1,254 4.63 % 104,519 2,259 4.36 % 108,301 2,514 4.67 %
Mortgages - held for sale 8,378 77 3.69 % 18,495 160 3.48 % 8,507 148 3.51 % 14,268 258 3.64 %
Net loans and leases 3,419,723 40,126 4.71 % 3,209,539 40,274 5.05 % 3,381,093 79,325 4.73 % 3,149,704 80,202 5.12 %
Other investments 54,293 241 1.78 % 67,916 231 1.37 % 54,484 483 1.79 % 63,554 457 1.45 %
Total Earning Assets 4,326,264 45,064 4.18 % 4,180,012 46,253 4.45 % 4,294,509 89,408 4.20 % 4,114,421 92,092 4.50 %
Cash and due from banks 61,107 62,382 58,915 60,970
Reserve for loan and lease losses (84,882 ) (83,071 ) (84,510 ) (82,766 )
Other assets 309,464 322,380 308,892 328,557
Total $ 4,611,953 $ 4,481,703 $ 4,577,806 $ 4,421,182
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY:
Interest-bearing deposits $ 3,043,806 $ 4,412 0.58 % $ 2,986,588 $ 5,704 0.77 % $ 3,029,013 $ 8,954 0.60 % $ 2,950,588 $ 11,449 0.78 %
Short-term borrowings 139,708 45 0.13 % 146,016 47 0.13 % 129,597 77 0.12 % 140,468 100 0.14 %
Subordinated notes 58,764 1,055 7.20 % 89,692 1,648 7.39 % 58,764 2,110 7.24 % 89,692 3,295 7.39 %
Long-term debt and mandatorily redeemable securities 62,918 228 1.45 % 48,954 357 2.93 % 67,388 723 2.16 % 43,664 828 3.81 %
Total Interest-Bearing Liabilities 3,305,196 5,740 0.70 % 3,271,250 7,756 0.95 % 3,284,762 11,864 0.73 % 3,224,412 15,672 0.98 %
Noninterest-bearing deposits 675,201 601,613 662,778 587,959
Other liabilities 56,688 68,510 60,046 72,282
Shareholders’ equity 574,867 540,330 570,220 536,529
Total $ 4,611,952 $ 4,481,703 $ 4,577,806 $ 4,421,182
Net Interest Income $ 39,324 $ 38,497 $ 77,544 $ 76,420
Net Yield on Earning Assets on a Taxable Equivalent Basis 3.65 % 3.70 % 3.64 % 3.74 %

*PROVISION AND RESERVE FOR LOAN AND LEASE LOSSES*

The provision for loan and lease losses for the three and six month period ended June 30, 2013 was $1.29 million and $2.05 million respectively, compared to a provision for loan and lease losses in the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2012 of $2.06 million and $4.31 million respectively. Net recoveries of $0.39 million were recorded for the second quarter 2013, compared to net charge-offs of $1.15 million for the same quarter a year ago. Year-to-date net recoveries of $0.33 million have been recorded in 2013, compared to net charge-offs $2.65 million through June 30, 2012.

36

SEQ.=1,FOLIO='36',FILE='C:\jms\106747\13-13452-1\task6142645\13452-1-ga.htm',USER='106747',CD='Jul 22 20:06 2013'

Table of Contents

On June 30, 2013, 30 day and over loan and lease delinquencies were 0.27% compared to 0.31% on June 30, 2012. The reserve for loan and lease losses as a percentage of loans and leases outstanding at the end of the period was 2.45% as compared to 2.55% one year ago. A summary of loan and lease loss experience during the three and six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012 is located in Note 5 of the Consolidated Financial Statements.

A loan or lease is considered impaired, based on current information and events, if it is probable that we will be unable to collect the scheduled payments of principal or interest when due according to the contractual terms of the loan or lease agreement. We evaluate loans and leases exceeding $100,000 for impairment and establish an allowance as a component of the reserve for loan and lease losses when it is probable all amounts due will not be collected pursuant to the contractual terms of the loan and lease and the recorded investment in the loan or lease exceeds its fair value. A summary of impaired loans as of June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012 is reflected in Note 4 of the Consolidated Financial Statements.

*NONPERFORMING ASSETS*

Nonperforming assets were as follows:

June 30, December 31, June 30,
(Dollars in thousands) 2013 2012 2012
Loans and leases past due 90 days or more $ 184 $ 442 $ 439
Nonaccrual loans and leases 29,318 36,417 45,777
Other real estate 5,455 4,311 7,257
Former bank premises held for sale 951 1,034 1,134
Repossessions 137 63 1,177
Equipment owned under operating leases — — 9
Total nonperforming assets $ 36,045 $ 42,267 $ 55,793

Nonperforming assets as a percentage of total loans and leases were 1.01% at June 30, 2013, 1.25% at December 31, 2012, and 1.67% at June 30, 2012. Nonperforming assets totaled $36.05 million at June 30, 2013, a decrease of 14.72% from the $42.27 million reported at December 31, 2012, and a 35.40% decrease from the $55.79 million reported at June 30, 2012. The decrease during the first six months of 2013 compared to the same period in 2012 was primarily related to decreases in nonaccrual loans and leases and the sale of repossessed assets and other real estate as the economy slowly improves.

The decrease in nonaccrual loans and leases at June 30, 2013 from December 31, 2012 and the decrease in nonaccrual loans and leases at June 30, 2013 from June 30, 2012 occurred across almost all loan types. A summary of nonaccrual loans and leases and past due aging for the period ended June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012 is located in Note 4 of the Consolidated Financial Statements.

As of June 30, 2013, the industry with the largest dollar exposure was with borrowers whose primary source of income was derived from commercial real estate. These impaired loans totaled approximately $14.60 million which were comprised of $12.33 million secured by commercial real estate and included in loans secured by real estate, $1.12 million secured by construction equipment and included in construction equipment financing and $1.15 million secured by aircraft and included in aircraft financing. We have limited exposure to commercial real estate. However, our borrowers with commercial real estate exposure have suffered in this economy. Furthermore, aircraft values for some models declined from 2010 to 2012, increasing the risk in aircraft secured transactions; values appear to have stabilized in 2013.

Other real estate is the result of foreclosing on real estate in the local market for which we have a current appraisal and are well secured. Other real estate decreased over the past year due to sales of existing properties outpacing current foreclosures.

37

SEQ.=1,FOLIO='37',FILE='C:\jms\106747\13-13452-1\task6142645\13452-1-ga.htm',USER='106747',CD='Jul 22 20:06 2013'

Table of Contents

Repossessions consisted mainly of auto, light truck and environmental equipment at June 30, 2013. At the time of repossession, the recorded amount of the loan or lease is written down, if necessary, to the estimated value of the equipment or vehicle by a charge to the reserve for loan and lease losses, unless the equipment is in the process of immediate sale. Any subsequent write-downs are included in noninterest expense.

A summary of other real estate and repossessions is shown in the table below:

June 30, December 31, June 30,
(Dollars in thousands) 2013 2012 2012
Commercial and agricultural loans $ — $ — $ —
Auto, light truck and environmental equipment 130 52 9
Medium and heavy duty truck — — —
Aircraft financing — — 1,165
Construction equipment financing — — —
Commercial real estate 4,438 3,362 6,253
Residential real estate 719 545 1,004
Consumer loans 305 415 3
Total $ 5,592 $ 4,374 $ 8,434

For financial statement purposes, nonaccrual loans and leases are included in loan and lease outstandings, whereas repossessions and other real estate are included in other assets.

*Foreign Outstandings* — Our foreign loan and lease outstandings, all denominated in U.S. dollars were $265.12 million and $271.41 million as of June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively. Foreign loans and leases are in aircraft financing. Loan and lease outstandings to borrowers in Brazil and Mexico were $159.08 million and $60.91 million as of June 30, 2013, respectively, compared to $169.42 million and $55.12 million as of December 31, 2012, respectively. Outstanding balances to borrowers in other countries were insignificant.

*NONINTEREST INCOME*

Noninterest income for the three month period ended June 30, 2013 and 2012 was $20.12 million and $19.79 million, respectively. Noninterest income for the six month period ended June 30, 2013 and 2012 was $39.07 million and $40.31 million, respectively. Details of noninterest income follow:

Three Months Ended — June 30, Six Months Ended — June 30,
(Dollars in thousands) 2013 2012 2013 2012
Noninterest income:
Trust fees $ 4,439 $ 4,379 $ 8,540 $ 8,352
Service charges on deposit accounts 2,325 2,621 4,564 5,059
Debit card income 2,344 2,194 4,409 4,261
Mortgage banking income 1,936 1,502 3,564 3,444
Insurance commissions 1,393 1,211 2,839 2,568
Equipment rental income 4,086 4,666 8,098 10,016
Investment securities and other investment gains 38 8 211 403
Other income 3,560 3,209 6,844 6,210
Total noninterest income $ 20,121 $ 19,790 $ 39,069 $ 40,313

Noninterest income increased $0.33 million or 1.67% for the three months ended June 30, 2013 as compared to the same period in 2012. Noninterest income decreased $1.24 million or 3.09% for the six months ended June 30, 2013 compared to the same period one year ago. Trust fees and debit card income increased slightly in 2013 over the same periods in 2012.

38

SEQ.=1,FOLIO='38',FILE='C:\jms\106747\13-13452-1\task6142645\13452-1-ga.htm',USER='106747',CD='Jul 22 20:06 2013'

Table of Contents

Service charges on deposit accounts decreased $0.30 million or 11.29% and $0.50 million or 9.78% for the three and six months ended June 30, 2013, respectively over the comparable periods one year ago. The decrease in service charges on deposit accounts reflects a lower volume of nonsufficient fund transactions.

Mortgage banking income increased $0.43 million or 28.89% in the second quarter of 2013 as compared to the second quarter of 2012. Mortgage banking income increased $0.12 million or 3.48% during the first six months of 2013 versus the first six months of 2012. This positive variance was caused by increased gains on loan sales due to higher production volumes and improved margins in 2013.

Insurance commissions improved $0.18 million or 15.03% and $0.27 million or 10.55% in the three and six months ended June 30, 2013 over the same periods a year ago. The increase related to higher premium and agency fees as well as an increase in the number of policies.

Equipment rental income declined $0.58 million or 12.43% in the second quarter of 2013 compared to the second quarter 2012. Equipment rental income declined $1.92 million or 19.15% for year-to-date 2013 compared to the same period in 2012. The average equipment rental portfolio decreased 21.24% in 2013 over the same period in 2012 resulting in lower rental income. In addition, new leases are at lower rates due to current market conditions and increased competition.

Investment securities and other investment gains were relatively flat for the second quarter 2013 and decreased $0.19 million or 47.64% for year-to-date 2013 as compared to the same periods one year ago. The decrease was due primarily to gains on sale of agency securities and corporate debt securities in 2012 which were not present in 2013.

Other income increased $0.35 million or 10.94% and $0.63 million or 10.21% for the three and six months ended June 30, 2013, respectively as compared to the same periods in 2012 primarily due to higher mutual fund income and fees on customer swaps.

*NONINTEREST EXPENSE*

Noninterest expense for the three month period ended June 30, 2013 and 2012 was $35.74 million and $36.58 million, respectively. Noninterest expense for the six month period ended June 30, 2013 and 2012 was $72.29 million and $74.63 million, respectively. Details of noninterest expense follow:

Three Months Ended — June 30, Six Months Ended — June 30,
(Dollars in thousands) 2013 2012 2013 2012
Noninterest expense:
Salaries and employee benefits $ 19,176 $ 20,370 $ 39,112 $ 40,686
Net occupancy expense 2,147 1,848 4,354 4,008
Furniture and equipment expense 3,909 3,831 7,808 7,338
Depreciation - leased equipment 3,274 3,803 6,499 8,114
Professional fees 1,310 1,449 2,665 2,847
Supplies and communication 1,499 1,385 3,035 2,778
FDIC and other insurance 927 854 1,805 1,803
Business development and marketing expense 932 1,050 1,705 1,917
Loan and lease collection and repossession expense 1,095 979 1,852 2,480
Other expense 1,475 1,009 3,459 2,655
Total noninterest expense $ 35,744 $ 36,578 $ 72,294 $ 74,626

39

SEQ.=1,FOLIO='39',FILE='C:\jms\106747\13-13452-1\task6142645\13452-1-gc.htm',USER='106747',CD='Jul 22 20:08 2013'

Table of Contents

Noninterest expense decreased $0.83 million or 2.28% for the second quarter and $2.33 million or 3.12% for year-to-date 2013 as compared to the same periods in 2012. FDIC and other insurance expense increased slightly in 2013 over the same periods in 2012.

Salaries and employee benefits decreased $1.19 million or 5.86% and $1.57 million or 3.87% in the three and six months ended June 30, 2013, respectively versus the three and six months ended June 30, 2012. Salaries were lower mainly due to decreased base salaries, incentives and commissions expense. Benefits increased primarily due to higher group insurance costs.

Net occupancy expense was higher by $0.30 million or 16.18% for the second quarter of 2013 and $0.35 million or 8.63% for year-to-date 2013 compared to the same periods one year ago. The increase was primarily a result of higher rent and real estate taxes.

Furniture and equipment expense was flat for the second quarter of 2013 and increased $0.47 million or 6.41% for year-to-date 2013 compared to the same periods in 2012. Furniture and equipment expense was higher mainly due to increased equipment depreciation, computer processing charges and software maintenance costs.

During the second quarter and first six months of 2013, depreciation on leased equipment decreased $0.53 million or 13.91% and $1.62 million or 19.90%, respectively in conjunction with the decrease in equipment rental income as compared to the same periods one year ago.

Professional fees decreased $0.14 million or 9.59% and $0.18 million or 6.39% for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2013 respectively, as compared to the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2012. The decrease in professional fees in 2013 was primarily the result of reduced utilization of consulting services.

Business development and marketing expense decreased $0.12 million or 11.24% for the three months ended June 30, 2013 versus the three months ended June 30, 2012 and $0.21 million or 11.06% for the six months ended June 30, 2013 versus the six months ended June 30, 2012. The reduction was primarily due to decreased retail marketing.

Loan and lease collection and repossession expense increased $0.12 million or 11.85% for the three months ended June 30, 2013 compared to the same period in 2012 primarily due to repurchased mortgage loan losses in 2013 compared to 2012. Loan and lease collection and repossession expense decreased $0.63 million or 25.32% in the six month period ended June 30, 2013 compared to the same period a year ago mainly due to a decreased amount of repossessions outstanding offset by higher repurchased mortgage loan losses in 2013 compared to 2012.

Other expenses increased $0.47 million or 46.18% and $0.80 million or 30.28% in the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2013, respectively as compared to the same periods in 2012 primarily related to a previously reported trustee matter.

*INCOME TAXES*

The provision for income taxes for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2013 was $8.01 and $15.00 million, respectively compared to $6.57 million and $12.46 million for the same periods in 2012. The effective tax rates were 36.49% and 34.31% for the second quarter ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively and 36.28% and 33.90% for the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively. The effective tax rates are higher in 2013 compared to 2012 due to the impact of state refunds for 2009 received in January of 2012.

40

SEQ.=1,FOLIO='40',FILE='C:\jms\106747\13-13452-1\task6142645\13452-1-gc.htm',USER='106747',CD='Jul 22 20:08 2013'

Table of Contents

Effective January 1, 2014, the Indiana Financial Institutions tax rate decreases from 8.5% to 8.0% and continues to decrease by 0.5% each of the next three years. As a result of the rate change, the Company decreased the carrying value of certain state deferred tax assets. The impact of this change was not material and was recorded in the financial statements during the second quarter of 2013.

*ITEM 3.*

*QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK*

There have been no material changes in market risks faced by 1st Source since December 31, 2012. For information regarding our market risk, refer to 1st Source’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012.

*ITEM 4.*

*CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES*

As of the end of the period covered by this report an evaluation was carried out, under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 13a-14. Based upon that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that, at June 30, 2013, our disclosure controls and procedures were effective in ensuring that information required to be disclosed by 1st Source in reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and forms and are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in those reports is accumulated and communicated to management as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

In addition, there were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(f)) during the second fiscal quarter of 2013 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal controls over financial reporting.

*PART II. OTHER INFORMATION*

ITEM 1. Legal Proceedings.

1st Source and its subsidiaries are involved in various legal proceedings incidental to the conduct of our businesses. Management does not expect that the outcome of any such proceedings will have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial position or results of operations.

ITEM 1A. Risk Factors.

There have been no material changes in risks faced by 1st Source since December 31, 2012. For information regarding our risk factors, refer to 1st Source’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012.

41

SEQ.=1,FOLIO='41',FILE='C:\jms\106747\13-13452-1\task6142645\13452-1-gc.htm',USER='106747',CD='Jul 22 20:08 2013'

Table of Contents

ITEM 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES

Total number Average Total number of — shares purchased Maximum number (or approximate — dollar value) of shares
of shares price paid per as part of publicly announced that may yet be purchased under
Period purchased share plans or programs* the plans or programs
April 01 - 30, 2013 — $ — — 945,226
May 01 - 31, 2013 2,263 24.10 2,263 942,963
June 01 - 30, 2013 — — — 942,963
  • 1st Source maintains a stock repurchase plan that was authorized by the Board of Directors on April 26, 2007. Under the terms of the plan, 1st Source may repurchase up to 2,000,000 shares of its common stock when favorable conditions exist on the open market or through private transactions at various prices from time to time. Since the inception of the plan, 1st Source has repurchased a total of 1,057,037 shares.

ITEM 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities.

None

ITEM 4. Mine Safety Disclosures.

None

ITEM 5. Other Information.

None

ITEM 6. Exhibits

The following exhibits are filed with this report:

31.1 Certification of Chief Executive Officer required by Rule 13a-14(a).
31.2 Certification of Chief Financial Officer required by Rule 13a-14(a).
32.1 Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 of Chief Executive Officer.
32.2 Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 of Chief Financial Officer.
101.INS XBRL Instance Document
101.SCH XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document
101.CAL XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document
101.LAB XBRL Taxonomy Extension Labels Linkbase Document
101.PRE XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document
101.DEF XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document

42

SEQ.=1,FOLIO='42',FILE='C:\jms\106747\13-13452-1\task6142645\13452-1-gc.htm',USER='106747',CD='Jul 22 20:08 2013'

Table of Contents

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

DATE July 25, 2013 1st Source Corporation — /s/ CHRISTOPHER J. MURPHY III
Christopher J. Murphy III
Chairman of the Board, President and CEO
DATE July 25, 2013 /s/ ANDREA G. SHORT
Andrea G. Short
Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer Principal Accounting Officer

43

SEQ.=1,FOLIO='43',FILE='C:\jms\106747\13-13452-1\task6142645\13452-1-gc.htm',USER='106747',CD='Jul 22 20:08 2013'