Annual Report • Oct 7, 2022
Annual Report
Open in ViewerOpens in native device viewer
ANNUAL REPORT AND FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 2022
Wetherspoon owns and operates pubs throughout the UK and Ireland. The company aims to provide customers with good-quality food and drinks, served by well-trained and friendly staff, at reasonable prices.
The pubs are individually designed, and the company aims to maintain them in excellent condition.
| SECTION 1 | |
|---|---|
| 1 | Chairman's statement |
| 11 | Income statement |
| 11 | Statement of comprehensive income |
| 12 | Cash flow statement |
| 13 | Balance sheet |
| 14 | Statement of changes in equity |
| 15 | Notes to the financial statements |
| SECTION 2 |
| 43 | Accounting policies |
|---|---|
| 49 | Strategic report |
| 54 | Task Force on Climate-related Financial |
| Disclosures (TCFD) | |
| 55 | Independent auditors' report |
| 65 | Directors and officers |
| 66 | Directors' report |
| 69 | Directors' remuneration report |
| 78 | Corporate governance |
| 85 | Information for shareholders |
| 86 | Pubs opened and closed during the |
| financial year | |
| 87 | Company information |
| 88 | Glossary |
Year end 30 July 2023
Preliminary announcement for 2023 October 2023
Interim report for 2023 March 2023
Annual general meeting 17 November 2022
View this report online: jdwetherspoon.com/investors-home
The company was founded in 1979 – and this is the 39th year since incorporation in 1983. The table below outlines some key aspects of our performance during that period.
| Financial year | Total number of Pubs (Sites) |
Total sales £000 |
Profit/(loss) before tax and exceptional items £000 |
Earnings per share before exceptional items pence |
Free cash flow £000 |
Free cash flow per share pence |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1984 | 1 | 818 | (7) | 0 | ||
| 1985 | 2 | 1,890 | 185 | 0.2 | ||
| 1986 | 2 | 2,197 | 219 | 0.2 | ||
| 1987 | 5 | 3,357 | 382 | 0.3 | ||
| 1988 | 6 | 3,709 | 248 | 0.3 | ||
| 1989 | 9 | 5,584 | 789 | 0.6 | 915 | 0.4 |
| 1990 | 19 | 7,047 | 603 | 0.4 | 732 | 0.4 |
| 1991 | 31 | 13,192 | 1,098 | 0.8 | 1,236 | 0.6 |
| 1992 | 45 | 21,380 | 2,020 | 1.9 | 3,563 | 2.1 |
| 1993 | 67 | 30,800 | 4,171 | 3.3 | 5,079 | 3.9 |
| 1994 | 87 | 46,600 | 6,477 | 3.6 | 5,837 | 3.6 |
| 1995 | 110 | 68,536 | 9,713 | 4.9 | 13,495 | 7.4 |
| 1996 | 146 | 100,480 | 15,200 | 7.8 | 20,968 | 11.2 |
| 1997 | 194 | 139,444 | 17,566 | 8.7 | 28,027 | 14.4 |
| 1998 | 252 | 188,515 | 20,165 | 9.9 | 28,448 | 14.5 |
| 1999 | 327 | 269,699 | 26,214 | 12.9 | 40,088 | 20.3 |
| 2000 | 428 | 369,628 | 36,052 | 11.8 | 49,296 | 24.2 |
| 2001 | 522 | 483,968 | 44,317 | 14.2 | 61,197 | 29.1 |
| 2002 | 608 | 601,295 | 53,568 | 16.6 | 71,370 | 33.5 |
| 2003 | 635 | 730,913 | 56,139 | 17.0 | 83,097 | 38.8 |
| 2004 | 643 | 787,126 | 54,074 | 17.7 | 73,477 | 36.7 |
| 20054 | 655 | 809,861 | 47,177 | 16.9 | 68,774 | 37.1 |
| 2006 | 657 | 847,516 | 58,388 | 24.1 | 69,712 | 42.1 |
| 2007 | 671 | 888,473 | 62,024 | 28.1 | 52,379 | 35.6 |
| 2008 | 694 | 907,500 | 58,228 | 27.6 | 71,411 | 50.6 |
| 2009 | 731 | 955,119 | 66,155 | 32.6 | 99,494 | 71.7 |
| 2010 | 775 | 996,327 | 71,015 | 36.0 | 71,344 | 52.9 |
| 2011 | 823 | 1,072,014 | 66,781 | 34.1 | 78,818 | 57.7 |
| 2012 | 860 | 1,197,129 | 72,363 | 39.8 | 91,542 | 70.4 |
| 2013 | 886 | 1,280,929 | 76,943 | 44.8 | 65,349 | 51.8 |
| 2014 | 927 | 1,409,333 | 79,362 | 47.0 | 92,850 | 74.1 |
| 2015 | 951 | 1,513,923 | 77,798 | 47.0 | 109,778 | 89.8 |
| 2016 | 926 | 1,595,197 | 80,610 | 48.3 | 90,485 | 76.7 |
| 2017 | 895 | 1,660,750 | 102,830 | 69.2 | 107,936 | 97.0 |
| 2018 | 883 | 1,693,818 | 107,249 | 79.2 | 93,357 | 88.4 |
| 2019 | 879 | 1,818,793 | 102,459 | 75.5 | 96,998 | 92.0 |
| 20206 | 872 | 1,262,048 | (44,687) | (35.5) | (58,852) | (54.2) |
| 2021 | 861 | 772,555 | (154,676) | (119.2) | (83,284) | (67.8) |
| 20223 | 852 | 1,740,477 | (30,448) | (19.6) | 21,922 | 17.3 |
Adjustments to statutory numbers
years prior to 2022.
the issue of new shares and capitalisation issues. 2. Free cash flow per share excludes dividends paid which were included in the free cash flow calculations in the annual report and accounts for
the years 1995–2000. 3. The weighted average number of shares, EPS and free cash flow per share include those shares held in trust for employee share schemes for all 4. Before 2005, the accounts were prepared under UKGAAP. All accounts from 2005 to date have been prepared under IFRS.
Apart from the items in notes 1–4, all numbers are as reported in each year's published accounts.
From financial year 2020 data is based on post-IFRS 16 numbers following
the transition from IAS17 to IFRS 16.
To coin a Shakespeare phrase, "the multiplying villainies of nature do swarm upon" the hospitality industry, following the lockdowns and restrictions of the pandemic - and surprisingly perhaps, the aftermath has been just as difficult for many companies.
Most commentators, including most publicans, understandably predicted a post-lockdown boom, in which the public would react to enforced cabin fever by embarking on a celebratory spree, but the reality has, in contrast, been a painstakingly slow recovery in sales, for some but not all, accompanied by great inflation in costs.
A possible reason for the much slower-thananticipated recovery has been an underestimation of the power of habit in determining human behaviour.
During lockdown, dyed-in-the-wool pub-goers, many for the first time, filled their fridges with supermarket beer - and it has proved to be a momentous challenge to persuade them to return to the more salubrious environment of the saloon bar.
Even so, Wetherspoon's trading performance in FY22 improved versus the annus horribilis of FY21, but was still markedly adverse to pre-pandemic FY19.
Although like-for-like sales decreased by 4.7% compared to FY19, sales trends improved in the financial year. In the first half, like-for-like sales were -7.4%; in the third quarter they were -4.0% and in the fourth quarter they were -0.6%.
Like-for-like sales have improved in the first 9 weeks of the current financial year (FY23) and are 10.1% ahead of the first 9 weeks of FY22.
In addition to the slowly improving sales trend, there was a significant turnaround of £105 million in free cashflow, which improved to an inflow of £21.9 million in FY22 compared to an outflow of £83.3 million in FY21.
Perhaps surprisingly, the Wetherspoon balance sheet is also stronger than before the pandemic, at the expense of some dilution to pre-pandemic shareholders.
Debt levels, combined with trade creditors (excluding notional IFRS 16 lease debt), have increased by £53 million since January 2020, just before the first lockdown, substantially less than a total of £158.3 million invested in freehold "reversions" and new pubs during the period.
Since January 2020, £70.5 million has been spent on freehold reversions (where Wetherspoon was previously the tenant) and £87.8 million on new pubs.
Two equity issues during the pandemic were, of course, key factors in this strengthening of the balance sheet.
On an IFRS 16 basis, which includes notional debt from leases, debt decreased from £1.45 billion to £1.29 billion between January 2020 and the end of FY22.
In this context, Wetherspoon has, as reported below, fixed £770 million of its debt until November 2031, at an average of 1.24%, excluding the banks' margin, a significant benefit at a time of rising interest rates.
Fortunately, the company was able to extend these swaps by 32 months in the first half of FY22 - before sharply rising inflation and interest rates were anticipated by the market.
The mark-to-market value of these swaps was £182.7 million, as of 2 October 2022.
In the summary below we have compared sales and profits with FY19, but cash flow, debt and other areas are compared with FY21. To try to avoid confusion, we also provide a table, below, showing some key indicators referred to in this section of the annual report, for the last four financial years.
Total sales for FY22 were £1,740.5 million, a decrease of 4.3%, compared to the pre-pandemic 52 weeks ended 28 July 2019.
Like-for-like sales, as indicated above, compared to FY19, decreased by 4.7%. Like-for-like bar sales decreased by 6.5% and food sales by 3.2%. Slot/fruit machine sales increased by 12.3% and hotel room sales increased by 6.5%.
The operating profit, before exceptional items, was £25.7 million (2019: £131.9 million). The operating margin, before exceptional items, was 1.5% (2019: 7.3%).
The loss before tax and exceptional items was £30.4 million (2019: £102.5 million profit). This included property gains of £2.1 million (2019: £5.6 million).
The company sold, closed, or terminated the leases of 15 pubs, giving rise to a cash inflow of £5.9 million.
Losses per share, including shares held in trust by the employee share scheme, before exceptional items, were 19.6p (2019: earnings per share of 75.5p).
Total capital investment was £127.3 million (2021: £62.7 million). £58.8 million was invested in new pubs and pub extensions (2021: £24.1 million),
£42.8 million in existing pubs and IT (2021: £20.0 million) and £25.8 million in freehold reversions of properties where Wetherspoon was the tenant (2021: £16.9 million).
The company continued to increase investment levels, on the basis that the adverse effects of Covid-19 would eventually diminish.
IFRS 16 'Leases' replaced IAS 17 'Leases' for accounting periods beginning on or after 1 January 2019. IFRS 16 was adopted by the Company on 29 July 2019 using the 'modified retrospective approach'.
| FY22 | FY21 | FY20 | FY19 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total sales excluding VAT (£m) |
1,740.5 | 772.6 | 1,262.0 | 1,818.8 |
| Like-for-like sales vs prior year |
29.9% | -38.4% | -29.5% | 6.8% |
| Operating profit/(loss) before exceptional items (£m) |
25.7 | -100.4 | 17.0 | 131.9 |
| Profit/(loss) before tax and exceptional items (£m) |
-30.4 | -167.2 | -44.7 | 102.5 |
| Free cash flow (£m) |
21.9 | -83.3 | -58.9 | 97.0 |
There was a pre-tax exceptional gain of £56.7 million (2021: £27.5 million loss).
£52.9 million of the gain related to the fair value movement of interest rate swaps, which the company has in place for approximately the next 9 years, as reported above, at an average rate of 1.24%, excluding the banks' margin. In addition, there was a gain of £27.8 million in relation to an HMRC claim, regarding the historic VAT treatment of slot/fruit machines. There was also a gain of £1.4 million in respect of government support grants, associated with the pandemic. Finally, there was a £24.4 million property impairment charge, in respect of pubs which were deemed unlikely to generate sufficient cash flows, in the future, to support their carrying value.
There was a free cash inflow of £21.9 million (2021: £83.3 million outflow), after capital payments of £45.9 million for existing pubs (2021: £22.3 million), £12.8 million for share purchases for employees (2021: £7.7 million) and payments of tax and interest. Free cash inflow per share was 17.3p (2021: 67.8p outflow).
The board has not recommended the payment of a final dividend (2021: £0). There have been no share buybacks in the financial year to date (2021: £0).
As at 31 July 2022, the company's total net debt, excluding derivatives and lease liabilities, was £891.6 million (2021: £845.5 million), an increase of £46.1 million.
The company has an agreement in place with its lenders which waives debt covenants until October 2023 and replaces them with a minimum liquidity requirement of £100 million in the first half of FY23, followed by relaxed leverage covenants in the second half of the year.
There has been no change in the total available finance facilities of £1,083.0 million during the period.
During the year, as reported above, the company has extended the period of its interest rate swaps, in respect of £770 million, from March 2029 to November 2031. The swap rate currently being paid, excluding the banks' margin, is 1.61%. The total cost of the company's debt, in the year under review, including the banks' margin was 4.46%. The cost of the swaps is illustrated in the table below:
| Swap Value |
Start Date | End Date | Weighted Average % |
|---|---|---|---|
| £770m | 30-Jul-21 | 30-Jul-23 | 1.61% |
| £770m | 31-Jul-23 | 30-Jul-26 | 1.10% |
| £770m | 31-Jul-26 | 30-Jun-28 | 1.33% |
| £770m | 01-Jul-28 | 29-Mar-29 | 1.32% |
| £770m | 31-Mar-29 | 30-Nov-31 | 1.02% |
The company opened seven pubs during the year and sold, closed or terminated the leases of 15 pubs. The company had a trading estate of 852 pubs at the financial year end.
The company is currently marketing 32 pubs, most of which are within a close radius of other pubs we own. The strategy of opening larger pubs, at a considerable distance from each other, reflects a long-term strategy, rather than a reaction to trading difficulties in the Covid era, as some commentators have incorrectly said.
The full-year depreciation charge, excluding depreciation of "right-of-use" assets (a new charge to the profit and loss account, post-IFRS 16) was £74.6 million (2021: £76.4 million).
The company has increased the percentage of freehold pubs it owns in the last 11 years.
As at 24 July 2011, the company's freehold/ leasehold ratio was 43.4%/56.6%. As at 31 July 2022, as a result of investment in freehold reversions and freehold pub openings, the ratio was 68.8%/31.2%.
As at 31 July 2022, the net book value of the property, plant and equipment of the company was £1.4 billion, including £1.1 billion of freehold and long-leasehold property.
The properties have not been revalued since 1999.
The current corporation tax charge for the year is £7.0 million (2021: £17.6 million credit). The 'accounting' tax credit, which appears in the income statement, is £5.6 million (2021: £20.7 million credit).
The accounting tax credit comprises two parts: the actual current tax credit (the 'cash' tax) and the deferred tax credit (the 'accounting' tax). The tax losses arising in the financial year will be carried forward for use against profits in future years, meaning that the cash tax benefit will be received in future years. Therefore, a 'deferred tax' benefit is created which will reverse in future years when the cash tax benefit of the losses is realised.
The company is seeking a refund of historic excise duty from HMRC, totalling £524k, in relation to goods sent to the Republic of Ireland, when Wetherspoon pubs first opened in that country. The company has been charged excise duty on the same goods twice, as they were purchased in the UK, and excise duty was paid in full. Irish excise duty was then paid in addition.
Owing to a paperwork error, in the early days of our business in the Republic, which the company has sought to rectify, it has, to date, been unable to reclaim this duty, even though it is transparently clear that the duty has been paid.
Business rates are supposed to be based on the value of the building, rather than the level of trade of the tenant. This should mean that the rateable value per square foot is approximately the same for comparable pubs in similar locations. However, as a result of the valuation approach adopted by the government "Assessor" in Scotland, Wetherspoon often pays far higher rates per square foot than its competitors.
This is highlighted (in the tables below) by assessments for the Omni Centre, a modern leisure complex in central Edinburgh, where Wetherspoon has been assessed at more than double the rate per square foot of the average of its competitors, and for The Centre in Livingston (West Lothian), a modern shopping centre, where a similar anomaly applies.
As a result of applying valuation practice from another era, which assumed that pubs charged approximately the same prices, the raison d'être of the rating system - that rates are based on property values, not the tenants trade- has been undermined.
Similar issues are evident in Galashiels, Arbroath, Wick, Anniesland - and indeed most Wetherspoon pubs in Scotland. In effect, the application of the rating system in Scotland discriminates against businesses like Wetherspoon, which have lower prices, and encourages businesses to charge higher prices. As a result, consumers are likely to pay higher prices, which cannot be the intent of rating legislation.
| Omni Centre, Edinburgh | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Occupier Name | Rateable Value (RV) |
Customer Area (ft²) |
Rates per square foot |
|||||
| Playfair (JDW) | £218,750 | 2,756 | £79.37 | |||||
| Unit 9 (vacant) | £48,900 | 1,053 | £46.44 | |||||
| Unit 7 (vacant) | £81,800 | 2,283 | £35.83 | |||||
| Frankie & Benny's | £119,500 | 2,731 | £43.76 | |||||
| Nando's | £122,750 | 2,804 | £43.78 | |||||
| Slug & Lettuce | £108,750 | 3,197 | £34.02 | |||||
| The Filling Station | £147,750 | 3,375 | £43.78 | |||||
| Tony Macaroni | £125,000 | 3,427 | £36.48 | |||||
| Unit 6 (vacant) | £141,750 | 3,956 | £35.83 | |||||
| Cosmo | £200,000 | 7,395 | £27.05 | |||||
| Average (exc JDW) | £121,800 | 3,358 | £38.55 |
| The Centre, Livingston | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Occupier Name | Rateable Value (RV) |
Customer Area (ft²) |
Rates per square foot |
||||||
| The Newyearfield (JDW) |
£165,750 | 4,090 | £40.53 | ||||||
| Paraffin Lamp | £52,200 | 2,077 | £25.13 | ||||||
| Wagamana | £67,600 | 2,096 | £32.25 | ||||||
| Nando's | £80,700 | 2,196 | £36.75 | ||||||
| Chiquito | £68,500 | 2,221 | £30.84 | ||||||
| Ask Italian | £69,600 | 2,254 | £30.88 | ||||||
| Pizza Express | £68,100 | 2,325 | £29.29 | ||||||
| Prezzo | £70,600 | 2,413 | £29.26 | ||||||
| Harvester | £98,600 | 3,171 | £31.09 | ||||||
| Pizza Hut | £111,000 | 3,796 | £29.24 | ||||||
| Hot Flame | £136,500 | 4,661 | £29.29 | ||||||
| Average (exc JDW) | £82,340 | 2,721 | £30.40 |
As we have previously stated, the government would generate more revenue and jobs if it were to create tax equality among supermarkets, pubs and restaurants. Supermarkets pay virtually no VAT in respect of food sales, whereas pubs pay 20%. This has enabled supermarkets to subsidise the price of alcoholic drinks, widening the price gap, to the detriment of pubs and restaurants. Pubs also pay around 20 pence a pint in business rates, whereas supermarkets pay only about 2 pence, creating further inequality.
Pubs have lost 50% of their beer sales to supermarkets in the last 35 or so years. It makes no sense for supermarkets to be treated more leniently than pubs, since pubs generate far more jobs per pint or meal than do supermarkets, as well as far higher levels of tax. Pubs also make an important contribution to the social life of many communities and have better visibility and control of those who consume alcoholic drinks.
Tax equality is particularly important for residents of less affluent areas, since the tax differential is more
important there – people can less afford to pay the difference in prices between the on and off trade.
As a result, in these less affluent areas, there are often fewer pubs, coffee shops and restaurants, with less employment and increased high-street derelication. Tax equality would also be in line with the principle of fairness – the same taxes should apply to businesses which sell the same products.
Wetherspoon and other pub and restaurant companies have always generated far more in taxes than are earned in profits. Wetherspoon, it's customers and staff, generated total taxes in FY19, before the pandemic, of £763.6 million. This equated to one pound in every thousand of UK government revenue.
In the financial year ended 31 July 2022, the company generated taxes of £662.7 million.
The table below shows the £5.8 billion of tax revenue generated by the company, its staff and customers in the last 10 years. Each pub, on average, generated £6.5 million in tax during that period. The tax generated by the company, during this 10-year period, equates to approximately 20 times the company's profits after tax.
| 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | TOTAL 2013 to 2022 |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| £m | £m | £m | £m | £m | £m | £m | £m | £m | £m | £m | |
| VAT | 287.7 | 93.8 | 244.3 | 357.9 | 332.8 | 323.4 | 311.7 | 294.4 | 275.1 | 253.0 | 2,774.1 |
| Alcohol duty | 156.6 | 70.6 | 124.2 | 174.4 | 175.9 | 167.2 | 164.4 | 161.4 | 157.0 | 144.4 | 1,496.1 |
| PAYE and NIC | 141.9 | 101.5 | 106.6 | 121.4 | 109.2 | 96.2 | 95.1 | 84.8 | 78.4 | 70.2 | 1,005.3 |
| Business rates | 50.3 | 1.5 | 39.5 | 57.3 | 55.6 | 53.0 | 50.2 | 48.7 | 44.9 | 46.4 | 447.4 |
| Corporation tax | 1.5 | - | 21.5 | 19.9 | 26.1 | 20.7 | 19.9 | 15.3 | 18.4 | 18.4 | 161.7 |
| Corporation tax credit (historic capital allowances) |
- | - | - | - | - | - | - | -2.0 | - | - | -2.0 |
| Fruit/slot Machine duty |
12.8 | 4.3 | 9.0 | 11.6 | 10.5 | 10.5 | 11 | 11.2 | 11.3 | 7.2 | 99.4 |
| Climate change levies |
9.7 | 7.9 | 10.0 | 9.6 | 9.2 | 9.7 | 8.7 | 6.4 | 6.3 | 4.3 | 81.8 |
| Stamp duty | 2.7 | 1.8 | 4.9 | 3.7 | 1.2 | 5.1 | 2.6 | 1.8 | 2.1 | 1.0 | 26.9 |
| Sugar tax | 2.9 | 1.3 | 2.0 | 2.9 | 0.8 | - | - | - | - | - | 9.9 |
| Fuel duty | 1.9 | 1.1 | 1.7 | 2.2 | 2.1 | 2.1 | 2.1 | 2.9 | 2.1 | 2.0 | 20.2 |
| Carbon tax | - | - | - | 1.9 | 3.0 | 3.4 | 3.6 | 3.7 | 2.7 | 2.6 | 20.9 |
| Premise licence and TV licences |
0.5 | 0.5 | 1.1 | 0.8 | 0.7 | 0.8 | 0.8 | 1.6 | 0.7 | 0.7 | 8.2 |
| Landfill tax | - | - | - | - | 1.7 | 2.5 | 2.2 | 2.2 | 1.5 | 1.3 | 11.4 |
| Employee support grants |
-4.4 | -213.0 | -124.1 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | -341.5 |
| Eat out to help out |
- | -23.2 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | -23.2 |
| Local Government Grants |
-1.4 | -11.1 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | -12.5 |
| TOTAL TAX | 662.7 | 37.0 | 440.7 | 763.6 | 728.8 | 694.6 | 672.3 | 632.4 | 600.5 | 551.5 | 5,784.1 |
| TAX PER PUB | 0.78 | 0.04 | 0.53 | 0.87 | 0.83 | 0.77 | 0.71 | 0.67 | 0.66 | 0.63 | 6.49 |
| TAX AS % OF NET SALES |
38.1% | 4.8% | 34.9% | 42.0% | 43.0% | 41.8% | 42.1% | 41.8% | 42.6% | 43.1% | 37.4% |
| LOSS/PROFIT AFTER TAX |
-24.9 | -146.5 | -38.5 | 79.6 | 83.6 | 76.9 | 56.9 | 57.5 | 58.9 | 65.2 | 268.7 |
Note – this table is prepared on a cash basis.
IFRS 16 was implemented in the year ending 26 July 2020 (FY20). From this period all profit numbers in the above table are on a Post-IFRS 16 basis. Prior to this date all profit numbers are on a Pre-IFRS 16 basis.
Wetherspoon has been a strong critic of the composition of the boards of UK-quoted companies.
As a result of the "nine-year rule", limiting the tenure of NEDs and the presumption in favour of "independent", part-time chairmen, boards are often composed of short-term directors, with very little representation from those who understand the company best - people who work for it full-time, or have worked for it full-time.
Wetherspoon's review of the boards of major banks and pub companies, which teetered on the edge of failure in the 2008-2010 recession, highlighted the short "tenure", on average, of directors.
In contrast, Wetherspoon noted the relative success, during this fraught financial period, of pub companies Fuller's and Young's, the boards of which were dominated by experienced executives, or former executives.
As a result, Wetherspoon has increased the level of experience on the Wetherspoon board by appointing four "worker directors".
All four worker directors started on the "shop floor" and eventually became successful pub managers. Three have been promoted to regional management roles. They have worked for the company for an average of 24 years.
Board composition cannot guarantee future success, but it makes sensible decisions, based on experience at the coalface of the business, more likely.
The UK Corporate Governance Code 2018 (the "Code") is a vast improvement on previous codes, emphasising the importance of employees, customers and other stakeholders in commercial success. It also emphasises the importance of its 'comply or explain' ethos, and the consequent need for shareholders to engage with companies in order to understand their explanations.
A major impediment to the effective implementation of comply or explain seems to be the undermanning of the corporate governance departments of major shareholders.
For example, Wetherspoon has met a compliance officer from one major institution who is responsible for around 400 companies - an impossible task, since the written regulatory output of each company is vast, coupled with the practical impossibility of meeting with so many companies in any meaningful way.
As a result, it appears that compliance officers and governance advisors, in practice, often rely on a "tick-box" approach, which is, itself, in breach of the Code.
A further issue is that many major investors, in their own companies, for sensible reasons, do not observe the nine-year rule, and other rules, themselves. An approach of "do what I say, not what I do" is clearly unsustainable.
As always, the company has tried to improve as many areas of the business as possible, on a weekto-week basis, rather than aiming for 'big ideas' or grand strategies.
Frequent calls on pubs by senior executives, the encouragement of criticism from pub staff and customers and the involvement of pub and area managers, among others, in weekly decisions, are the keys to success.
Wetherspoon paid £30.1 million in respect of bonuses and free shares to employees in the period ended 31 July 2022, of which 98.8% was paid to staff below board level and 91.5% was paid to staff working in our pubs.
Wetherspoon has been the biggest corporate sponsor of 'Young Lives vs Cancer' (previously CLIC Sargent), having raised a total of £20.6 million since 2002. During the pandemic, our contributions had been reduced, but since the reopening of our pubs there have been great efforts seen and our contributions have bounced back significantly.
As indicated above, Wetherspoon has, for many years (see table below), operated a bonus and share scheme for all employees. Before the pandemic, these awards increased, as earnings increased for shareholders.
| Financial year |
Bonus and free shares |
(Loss)/Profit after tax1 |
Bonus and free shares as % of profits |
|---|---|---|---|
| £m | £m | ||
| 2007 | 19 | 47 | 41% |
| 2008 | 16 | 36 | 45% |
| 2009 | 21 | 45 | 45% |
| 2010 | 23 | 51 | 44% |
| 2011 | 23 | 52 | 43% |
| 2012 | 24 | 57 | 42% |
| 2013 | 29 | 65 | 44% |
| 2014 | 29 | 59 | 50% |
| 2015 | 31 | 57 | 53% |
| 2016 | 33 | 57 | 58% |
| 2017 | 44 | 77 | 57% |
| 2018 | 43 | 84 | 51% |
| 2019 | 46 | 80 | 58% |
| 2020 | 33 | (39) | - |
| 2021 | 23 | (146) | - |
| 2022 | 30 | (25) | - |
| Total | 467 | 557 | 49.7%2 |
1 (IFRS 16 was implemented in the year ending 26 July 2020 (FY20). From this period all profit numbers in the above table are on a Post-IFRS 16 basis. Prior to this date all profit numbers are on a Pre-IFRS 16 basis. 2 Excludes 2020, 2021 and 2022.
The attraction and retention of talented pub and kitchen managers is important for any hospitality business. As the table below demonstrates, the retention of managers has improved, even during the pandemic.
| Financial year |
Average pub manager length of service |
Average kitchen manager length of service |
|---|---|---|
| (Years) | (Years) | |
| 2013 | 9.1 | 6.0 |
| 2014 | 10.0 | 6.1 |
| 2015 | 10.1 | 6.1 |
| 2016 | 11.0 | 7.1 |
| 2017 | 11.1 | 8.0 |
| 2018 | 12.0 | 8.1 |
| 2019 | 12.2 | 8.1 |
| 2020 | 12.9 | 9.1 |
| 2021 | 13.6 | 9.6 |
| 2022 | 13.9 | 10.4 |
Wetherspoon has always emphasised the importance of hygiene standards.
We now have 775 pubs rated on the Food Standards Agency's website (see table below). The average score is 4.98, with 98.6% of the pubs achieving a top rating of five stars. We believe this to be the highest average rating for any substantial pub company.
In the separate Scottish scheme, which records either a 'pass' or a 'fail', all of our 60 pubs have passed.
| Pubs with | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Financial Year |
Total Pubs Scored |
Average Rating |
highest Rating % |
| 2013 | 771 | 4.85 | 87.0 |
| 2014 | 824 | 4.91 | 92.0 |
| 2015 | 858 | 4.93 | 94.1 |
| 2016 | 836 | 4.89 | 91.7 |
| 2017 | 818 | 4.89 | 91.8 |
| 2018 | 807 | 4.97 | 97.3 |
| 2019 | 799 | 4.97 | 97.4 |
| 2020 | 781 | 4.96 | 97.0 |
| 2021 | 787 | 4.97 | 98.4 |
| 2022 | 775 | 4.98 | 98.6 |
As previously reported, Wetherspoon agreed on an out-of-court settlement with developer Anthony Lyons, formerly of property leisure agent Davis Coffer Lyons, in 2013 and received approximately £1.25 million from Mr Lyons.
The payment relates to litigation in which Wetherspoon claimed that Mr Lyons had been an accessory to frauds committed by Wetherspoon's former retained agent Van de Berg and its directors Christian Braun, George Aldridge and Richard Harvey. Mr Lyons denied the claim – and the litigation was contested.
The claim related to properties in Portsmouth, Leytonstone and Newbury. The Portsmouth property was involved in the 2008/9 Van de Berg case itself.
In that case, Mr Justice Peter Smith found that Van de Berg, but not Mr Lyons (who was not a party to the case), fraudulently diverted the freehold from Wetherspoon to Moorstown Properties Limited, a company owned by Simon Conway. Moorstown leased the premises to Wetherspoon. Wetherspoon is still a leaseholder of this property – a pub called The Isambard Kingdom Brunel.
The properties in Leytonstone and Newbury (the other properties in the case against Mr Lyons) were not pleaded in the 2008/9 Van de Berg case.
Leytonstone was leased to Wetherspoon and trades today as The Walnut Tree public house. Newbury was leased to Pelican plc and became Café Rouge.
As we have also reported, the company agreed to settle its final claim in this series of cases and accepted £400,000 from property investor Jason Harris, formerly of First London and now of First
Urban Group. Wetherspoon alleged that Harris was an accessory to frauds committed by Van de Berg.
Harris contested the claim and has not admitted liability.
Before the conclusion of the above cases, Wetherspoon also agreed on a settlement with Paul Ferrari of London estate agent Ferrari Dewe & Co, in respect of properties referred to as the 'Ferrari Five' by Mr Justice Peter Smith.
The press and media have generally been fair and accurate in reporting on Wetherspoon over the decades. However, in the febrile atmosphere of the first lockdown, something went awry and a number of harmful inaccuracies were published.
In order to try and set the record straight, a special edition of Wetherspoon News was published, which includes details of the resulting apologies and corrections, which can be found on the Company's website
(https://www.jdwetherspoon.com/~/media/files/pdfdocuments/wetherspoon-news/does-truthmatter_.pdf ).
Su Cacioppo is retiring from the Wetherspoon board today, 7th October 2022, after 31 years with the company. Su started as a pub manager in 1991, then became an area manager, before eventually becoming the board director responsible for the personnel, legal and marketing departments in 2008.
Sir Richard Beckett KC is also retiring from the board at this year's AGM, after 13 years as a nonexecutive director of the company, latterly as head of the nominations committee.
I would like to thank sincerely Su and Richard for their dedicated, creative and conscientious work over many years.
Pubwatch is a forum where pubs in a town or city can meet together regularly, often with a police licensing officer, responsible for pubs in the area.
Local authorities sometimes attend and issues around maintaining good behaviour in pubs and in the town or city generally are debated.
A wide range of initiatives is promoted, including drink spiking awareness, town centre radio links, vulnerability training and refusal of entry to all pubs in the area for customers who misbehave.
Pubwatch has improved wider town and city environments, by bringing together pubs, local authorities and the police, in a concerted way, to encourage good behaviour and to reduce anti-social activity.
Wetherspoon has been a long-standing supporter of local Pubwatch schemes and has helped to organise 16 new schemes in the last year. Wetherspoon pubs are members of over 600 schemes country wide. The company also helps to fund National Pubwatch, founded by just 2 licensees and a police officer in 1997, which is the umbrella organisation that helps set up, coordinate and support local schemes.
It is our experience that in some towns and cities, where the authorities have struggled to control antisocial behaviour, the setting up of a Pubwatch has been instrumental in improving safety and security not only of licensed premises, but also of the town and city in general, as well as assisting the police in bringing down crime.
Conversely, we have found that in a number of towns, including some towns on the outskirts of London, that the absence of an effective Pubwatch scheme results in higher incidents of crime, disorder and anti-social behaviour.
In our view, Pubwatch is integral to making towns and cities a safe environment for everyone. Therefore, licensees, the police and local authorities throughout the land should give Pubwatch their full support.
As reported above, in the first 9 weeks of the current financial year, to 2 October 2022, like-for-like sales increased by 10.1%, compared to the 9 weeks to 3 October 2021.
As we have also outlined above, the company has improved its prospects in a number of ways in recent financial years - we own an increasing percentage of freehold properties; the balance sheet has been strengthened; interest rates have been fixed at low levels until 2031; we have a large contingent of long-serving pub staff and underlying sales are improving.
However, as a result of the previously reported increases in labour and repair costs and the potentially adverse effects of rises in interest rates and energy costs on the economy, firm predictions are hard to make.
Perhaps the biggest threat to the hospitality industry is the possibility of further lockdowns and restrictions.
Those interested in the UK government response to the pandemic may like to read the reports by
Professor Francois Balloux, director of the UCL Genetics Institute, in the Guardian, and by Professor Robert Dingwall, of Trent University, in the Telegraph (see pages 54 to 56 of Wetherspoon News
https://www.jdwetherspoon.com/~/media/files/pdfdocuments/wetherspoon-news/wetherspoon-newsautumn-2022.pdf ).
The conclusion of Professor Balloux, broadly echoed by Professor Dingwall, based on an analysis by the World Health Organisation of the pandemic, is that Sweden (which did not lock down), had a Covid-19 fatality rate "of about half the UK's" and that "the worst performer, by some margin, is Peru, despite enforcing the harshest, longest lockdown."
Professor Balloux concludes that "the strength of mitigation measures does not seem to be a particularly strong indicator of excess deaths."
Indeed, as some commentators have noted, lockdowns were not contemplated in the UK's laboriously compiled pre-pandemic plans. It appears that these plans were jettisoned, early on in the pandemic, in favour of copying China's lockdown approach - an example, perhaps, of Warren Buffett's so-called "institutional imperative" - "everyone else has locked down, so we will, too".
The other major threat to the hospitality industry, as reported above, is the huge and unjustifiable tax advantage that supermarkets enjoy. The hospitality industry pays far higher levels of VAT and business rates than supermarkets. This competitive disadvantage has had an increasingly debilitating impact on the hospitality industry and will undoubtedly result in long-term financial weakness vis a vis supermarkets - which will also be harmful to employees, the Treasury and the overall economy.
These caveats aside, in the absence of further lockdowns or restrictions, the company is cautiously optimistic, for the reasons we have outlined, about future prospects.
Tim Martin Chairman 6 October 2022
J D Wetherspoon plc, company number: 1709784
| 53 weeks ended 31 July |
53 weeks ended 31 July |
53 weeks ended 31 July |
52 weeks ended 25 July |
Restated1 52 weeks ended 25 July |
Restated1 52 weeks ended 25 July |
||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Notes | 2022 | 2022 | 2022 | 2021 | 2021 | 2021 | |
| Before exceptional |
Exceptional items |
After exceptional |
Before exceptional |
Exceptional items |
After exceptional |
||
| items | (note 4) | items | items | (note 4) | items | ||
| £000 | £000 | £000 | £000 | £000 | £000 | ||
| Revenue | 1 | 1,740,477 | - | 1,740,477 | 772,555 | - | 772,555 |
| Other operating income | - | 29,384 | 29,384 | - | 15,541 | 15,541 | |
| Operating costs | (1,714,757) | - | (1,714,757) | (872,913) | (24,482) | (897,395) | |
| Operating profit/(loss) | 2 | 25,720 | 29,384 | 55,104 | (100,358) | (8,941) | (109,299) |
| Property gains/(losses) | 3 | 2,142 | (24,526) | (22,384) | (123) | (5,839) | (5,962) |
| Finance income | 6 | 531 | 51,859 | 52,390 | 595 | - | 595 |
| Finance costs | 6 | (58,841) | - | (58,841) | (67,280) | (12,690) | (79,970) |
| (Loss)/profit before tax | (30,448) | 56,717 | 26,269 | (167,166) | (27,470) | (194,636) | |
| Income tax1 | 7 | 5,560 | (12,562) | (7,002) | 20,695 | (3,065) | 17,630 |
| (Loss)/profit for the period1 | (24,888) | 44,155 | 19,267 | (146,471) | (30,535) | (177,006) | |
| (Loss)/earnings per ordinary share (p) |
|||||||
| - Basic1 | 8 | (19.6) | 34.8 | 15.2 | (119.2) | (24.9) | (144.1) |
| - Diluted1 | 8 | (19.6) | 34.8 | 15.2 | (119.2) | (24.9) | (144.1) |
1Restated 25 July 2021. See Accounting policies page 48
| Notes | 53 weeks ended 31 July 2022 £000 |
Restated1 52 weeks ended 25 July 2021 £000 |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Items which will be reclassified subsequently to profit or loss: | |||
| Interest-rate swaps: gain taken to other comprehensive income | 22 | 48,452 | 44,551 |
| Interest-rate swaps: (loss)/gain reclassification to the income statement | 22 | (4,332) | 11,707 |
| Tax on items taken directly to other comprehensive income1 | 7 | (11,051) | (9,133) |
| Currency translation losses | (1,474) | (3,510) | |
| Net gain recognised directly in other comprehensive income1 | 31,595 | 43,615 | |
| Profit/(loss) for the period1 | 19,267 | (177,006) | |
| Total comprehensive profit/(loss) for the period | 50,862 | (133,391) |
1Restated 25 July 2021. See Accounting policies page 48
| Notes | 1Free cash flow |
Free cash flow |
|||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 53 weeks ended |
53 weeks ended |
52 weeks ended |
52 weeks ended |
||
| 31 July | 31 July | 25 July | 25 July | ||
| 2022 £000 |
2022 £000 |
2021 £000 |
2021 £000 |
||
| Cash flows from operating activities | |||||
| Cash generated from operations | 9 | 178,510 | 178,510 | 25,208 | 25,208 |
| Interest received | 97 | 97 | 187 | 187 | |
| Interest paid | (41,044) | (41,044) | (48,428) | (48,428) | |
| Corporation tax (paid)/received | (715) | (715) | 7,673 | 7,673 | |
| Lease interest | (17,501) | (17,501) | (19,942) | (19,942) | |
| Net cash flow from operating activities | 119,347 | 119,347 | (35,302) | (35,302) | |
| Cash flows from investing activities | |||||
| Reinvestment in pubs | (42,777) | (42,777) | (19,692) | (19,692) | |
| Reinvestment in business and IT projects | (3,113) | (3,113) | (2,620) | (2,620) | |
| Investment in new pubs and pub extensions | (51,083) | – | (21,131) | – | |
| Purchase of freeholds | (25,773) | – | (16,858) | – | |
| Proceeds of sale of property, plant and equipment | 10,547 | – | 2,575 | – | |
| Net cash flow from investing activities | (112,199) | (45,890) | (57,726) | (22,312) | |
| Cash flows from financing activities | |||||
| Purchase of own shares for share-based payments | (12,808) | (12,808) | (7,684) | (7,684) | |
| Loan issue cost | 10 | (192) | (192) | (434) | (434) |
| Advances/(repayments) under bank loans | 10 | 50,000 | – | (195,000) | – |
| Advances under CLBILS | 10 | – | – | 100,033 | – |
| Other loan receivables | 10 | (3,542) | – | – | – |
| Lease principal payments | 23 | (38,535) | (38,535) | (17,552) | (17,552) |
| Issue of share capital | 27 | – | – | 91,523 | – |
| Asset-financing principal payments | 10 | (7,132) | – | (6,901) | – |
| Net cash flow from financing activities | (12,209) | (51,535) | (36,015) | (25,670) | |
| Net change in cash and cash equivalents | 10 | (5,061) | (129,043) | ||
| Opening cash and cash equivalents | 18 | 45,408 | 174,451 | ||
| Closing cash and cash equivalents | 18 | 40,347 | 45,408 | ||
| Free cash flow | 21,922 | (83,284) |
1Free cash flow is a measure not required by accounting standards; a definition is provided in the accounting policies.
J D Wetherspoon plc, company number: 1709784
| Notes | 31 July | Restated1 25 July |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | 2021 | ||
| £000 | £000 | ||
| Assets | |||
| Non-current assets Property, plant and equipment |
13 | 1,426,862 | 1,423,826 |
| Intangible assets | 12 | 5,409 | 5,358 |
| Investment property | 14 | 23,364 | 10,533 |
| Right-of-use assets | 23 | 419,416 | 468,538 |
| Other loan receivable | 16 | 2,739 | - |
| Derivative financial instruments | 22 | 61,367 | - |
| Lease assets | 23 | 9,264 | 9,890 |
| Total non-current assets | 1,948,421 | 1,918,145 | |
| Current assets | |||
| Lease assets | 23 | 2,001 800 |
1,638 |
| Assets held for sale Inventories |
17 15 |
26,402 | - 26,853 |
| Receivables | 16 | 29,400 | 16,427 |
| Current income tax receivables | 2,000 | 1,187 | |
| Cash and cash equivalents | 18 | 40,347 | 45,408 |
| Total current assets | 100,950 | 91,513 | |
| Total assets | 2,049,371 | 2,009,658 | |
| Current liabilities | |||
| Borrowings | 20 | (5,137) | (7,610) |
| Trade and other payables | 19 | (282,481) | (259,791) |
| Provisions | 21 | (2,661) | (3,004) |
| Lease liabilities | 23 | (48,471) | (65,219) |
| Total current liabilities | (338,750) | (335,624) | |
| Non-current liabilities | |||
| Borrowings | 20 | (930,404) | (883,272) |
| Derivative financial instruments | 22 | (2,031) | (37,643) |
| Deferred tax liabilities | 7 | (34,718) | (16,546) |
| Lease liabilities | 23 | (421,583) | (458,596) |
| Total non-current liabilities | (1,388,736) | (1,396,057) | |
| Total liabilities | (1,727,486) | (1,731,681) | |
| Net assets | 321,885 | 277,977 | |
| Shareholders' equity | |||
| Share capital | 27 | 2,575 | 2,575 |
| Share premium account | 143,294 | 143,294 | |
| Capital redemption reserve | 2,337 | 2,337 | |
| Other reserves | 234,579 | 234,579 | |
| Hedging reserve1 | 22 | 13,617 | (19,452) |
| Currency translation reserve | (144) | 1,851 | |
| Retained earnings1 | (74,373) | (87,207) | |
| Total shareholders' equity | 321,885 | 277,977 |
1Restated 25 July 2021. See Accounting policies page 48
The financial statements, on pages 11–42, approved by the board of directors and authorised for issue on 6 October 2022, are signed on its behalf by:
John Hutson Ben Whitley Director Director
J D Wetherspoon plc, company
number: 1709784
| Notes | Share | Share premium |
Capital | Other | Restated1 | Currency | Restated1 | Total1 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| capital | account | redemption | Reserves | Hedging | translation | Retained | |||
| reserve | reserve | reserve | earnings | ||||||
| £000 | £000 | £000 | £000 | £000 | £000 | £000 | £000 | ||
| At 26 July 2020 | 2,408 | 143,294 | 2,337 | 141,002 | (66,577) | 7,089 | 87,695 | 317,248 | |
| Total comprehensive income | - | - | - | - | 47,125 | (5,238) | (175,278) | (133,391) | |
| Loss for the period1 | - | - | - | - | - | - | (177,006) | (177,006) | |
| Interest-rate swaps: cash flow hedges |
22 | - | - | - | - | 44,551 | - | - | 44,551 |
| Interest-rate swaps: amount reclassified to the income statement |
22 | - | - | - | - | 11,707 | - | - | 11,707 |
| Tax on items taken directly to comprehensive income1 |
7 | - | - | - | - | (9,133) | - | - | (9,133) |
| Currency translation differences | - | - | - | - | - | (5,238) | 1,728 | (3,510) | |
| Issued share capital (net of expenses) |
167 | - | - | 93,577 | - | - | (2,221) | 91,523 | |
| Share-based payment charges | - | - | - | - | - | - | 10,267 | 10,267 | |
| Tax on share-based payment | - | - | - | - | - | - | 14 | 14 | |
| Purchase of own shares for share based payments |
- | - | - | - | - | - | (7,684) | (7,684) | |
| As at 25 July 2021 as previously reported |
2,575 | 143,294 | 2,337 | 234,579 | (15,403) | 1,851 | (91,256) | 277,977 | |
| Effect of restatment1 | - | - | - | (4,049) | - | 4,049 | - | ||
| Restated1 At 25 July 2021 |
2,575 | 143,294 | 2,337 | 234,579 | (19,452) | 1,851 | (87,207) | 277,977 | |
| Total comprehensive income | - | - | - | - | 33,069 | (1,995) | 19,788 | 50,862 | |
| Profit for the period | - | - | - | - | - | - | 19,267 | 19,267 | |
| Interest-rate swaps: cash flow hedges |
22 | - | - | - | - | 48,452 | - | - | 48,452 |
| Interest-rate swaps: amount reclassified to the income statement |
22 | - | - | - | - | (4,332) | - | - | (4,332) |
| Tax on items taken directly to comprehensive income |
7 | - | - | - | - | (11,051) | - | - | (11,051) |
| Currency translation differences | - | - | - | - | - | (1,995) | 521 | (1,474) | |
| Share-based payment charges | - | - | - | - | - | - | 5,874 | 5,874 | |
| Tax on share-based payment | - | - | - | - | - | - | (20) | (20) | |
| Purchase of own shares for share based payments |
- | - | - | - | - | - | (12,808) | (12,808) | |
| At 31 July 2022 | 2,575 | 143,294 | 2,337 | 234,579 | 13,617 | (144) | (74,373) | 321,885 |
1Restated 25 July 2021. See Accounting policies page 48
The currency translation reserve contains the accumulated currency gains and losses on the long-term financing and balance sheet translation of the overseas branch. The currency translation difference reported in retained earnings is the retranslation of the opening reserves in the overseas branch at the current period end's currency exchange rate.
As at 31 July 2022, the company had distributable reserves of £173.7m (2021: £129.8m).
| ` | 53 weeks | 52 weeks |
|---|---|---|
| ended | ended | |
| 31 July | 25 July | |
| 2022 | 2021 | |
| £000 | £000 | |
| Bar | 1,024,677 | 440,119 |
| Food | 639,683 | 283,192 |
| Eat out to help out scheme (note 24) | - | 23,248 |
| Slot/fruit machines | 51,639 | 17,059 |
| Hotel | 22,848 | 8,592 |
| Other | 1,630 | 345 |
| 1,740,477 | 772,555 |
| This is stated after charging/(crediting): | 53 weeks | 52 weeks |
|---|---|---|
| ended | ended | |
| 31 July | 25 July | |
| 2022 | 2021 | |
| £000 | £000 | |
| Variable concession rental payments (note 23) | 8,799 | 2,801 |
| Short-term leases (note 23) | 10 | 784 |
| Cancelled principal payments (note 23) | (4,726) | (10,933) |
| Repairs and maintenance | 101,520 | 64,020 |
| Net rent receivable | (2,001) | (1,873) |
| Share-based payments (note 5) | 5,874 | 10,267 |
| Depreciation of property, plant and equipment (note 13) | 71,227 | 73,193 |
| Amortisation of intangible assets (note 12) | 3,240 | 3,151 |
| Depreciation of investment properties (note 14) | 87 | 44 |
| Depreciation of right-of-use assets (note 23) | 42,291 | 44,532 |
| Analysis of continuing operations | 53 weeks | 52 weeks |
|---|---|---|
| ended | ended | |
| 31 July | 25 July | |
| 2022 | 2021 | |
| £000 | £000 | |
| Revenue | 1,740,477 | 772,555 |
| Cost of sales1 | (1,640,202) | (844,574) |
| Gross profit/(loss) | 100,275 | (72,019) |
| Administration costs | (45,171) | (37,280) |
| Operating profit/(loss) after exceptional items | 55,104 | (109,299) |
| Auditor's remuneration | 53 weeks | 52 weeks |
|---|---|---|
| ended | ended | |
| 31 July | 25 July | |
| 2022 | 2021 | |
| £000 | £000 | |
| Fees payable for the audit of the financial statements | ||
| – Audit fees | 415 | 303 |
| – Additional audit work (for previous year audit) | 85 | 100 |
| Fees payable for other services: | ||
| – Audit related services (interim audit procedures) | 55 | 33 |
| Total auditor's fees | 555 | 436 |
1 Included in cost of sales is £599.8m (2021: £272.8m) relating to cost of inventory recognised as expense.
| 53 weeks | 53 weeks | 53 weeks | 52 weeks | 52 weeks | 52 weeks | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ended | ended | ended | ended | ended | ended | |
| 31 July 2022 |
31 July 2022 |
31 July 2022 |
25 July 2021 |
25 July 2021 |
25 July 2021 |
|
| Before | Exceptional | After | Before | Exceptional | After | |
| exceptional | items | exceptional | exceptional | items | exceptional | |
| items | (note 4) | items | items | (note 4) | items | |
| £000 | £000 | £000 | £000 | £000 | £000 | |
| Disposals | ||||||
| Fixed assets | 3,492 | (16) | 3,476 | 1,548 | 1,592 | 3,140 |
| Leases | (7,368) | – | (7,368) | (2,200) | – | (2,200) |
| Additional costs of disposal | 1,857 | 112 | 1,969 | 775 | 115 | 890 |
| (2,019) | 96 | (1,923) | 123 | 1,707 | 1,830 | |
| Impairments | ||||||
| Property, plant and equipment (note 13) | – | 19,451 | 19,451 | – | 1,999 | 1,999 |
| Investment properties (note 14) | – | 1,015 | 1,015 | – | – | – |
| Right-of-use assets (note 23) | – | 3,964 | 3,964 | – | 2,133 | 2,133 |
| – | 24,430 | 24,430 | – | 4,132 | 4,132 | |
| Other | ||||||
| Other property gains | (123) | – | (123) | – | – | – |
| (123) | – | (123) | – | – | – | |
| Total property losses/(gains) | (2,142) | 24,526 | 22,384 | 123 | 5,839 | 5,962 |
| 53 weeks | Restated1 | |
|---|---|---|
| ended | 52 weeks ended |
|
| 31 July | 25 July | |
| 2022 | 2021 | |
| £000 | £000 | |
| Exceptional operating items | ||
| Rank settlement | (27,771) | – |
| Local government support grants | (1,443) | (11,123) |
| Duty drawback | (170) | (4,418) |
| Exceptional operating income | (29,384) | (15,541) |
| Equipment | – | 3,753 |
| Stock losses | – | 4,158 |
| Staff costs | – | 15,692 |
| Other | – | 879 |
| Exceptional operating costs | – | 24,482 |
| Total exceptional operating (profit)/loss | (29,384) | 8,941 |
| Exceptional property losses | ||
| Disposal programme | ||
| Loss on disposal of pubs | 96 | 1,707 |
| 96 | 1,707 | |
| Other property losses | ||
| Impairment of assets under construction | 2,215 | – |
| Impairment of property, plant and equipment | 17,236 | 1,999 |
| Impairment of investment properties | 1,015 | – |
| Impairment of right of use assets | 3,964 | 2,133 |
| 24,430 | 4,132 | |
| Total exceptional property losses | 24,526 | 5,839 |
| Other exceptional items | ||
| Exceptional finance costs | 1,000 | 12,690 |
| Exceptional finance income | (52,859) | – |
| (51,859) | 12,690 | |
| Exceptional tax | ||
| Exceptional tax Items1 | (2,102) | 6,336 |
| Tax effect on exceptional items | 14,664 | (3,271) |
| 12,562 | 3,065 | |
| Total exceptional items1 | (44,155) | 30,535 |
1Restated 25 July 2021. See Accounting policies page 48
The company has recognised £27,771,000 from HMRC in relation to a long-standing claim, regarding the historic VAT treatment of slot/fruit machines.
The cash received from HMRC was £17,202,000. An amount of £10,569,000 was withheld to settle tax liabilities.This cash was received at the beginning of FY23.
The company has recognised £1,443,000 (2021: £11,123,000) of local government support grants in the UK and the Republic of Ireland, associated with the COVID-19 pandemic.
A credit of £170,000 (2021: £4,418,000) for duty drawback was received for perished stock during the period in relation to the COVID-19 lockdown in the UK.
The company has offered several of its sites for sale. At the end of the period, one (2021: one) further site had been sold.
In the table on the previous page, the costs classified under the 'exceptional property losses – disposal programme' relate to the loss on disposal of this sold site.
Property impairment relates to pubs which are deemed unlikely to generate sufficient cash flows in the future to support their carrying value. In the year, a total impairment charge of £23,415,000 (2021: £4,132,000) was incurred in respect of the impairment of assets as required under IAS 36. This included £3,420,000 reversal of impairments recognised in the year (2021: £Nil).
In the year, a total impairment charge of £1,015,000 (2021: £Nil) was incurred in respect of the impairment of our investment properties.
The exceptional finance costs of £1,000,000 relates to covenant-waiver fees.
The company has recognised exceptional finance income of £52,859,000, which relates to the fair value movement on a proportion of its interest rate swaps. £48,527,000 relates to swap transactions where hedge accounting does not apply resulting in fair value movements being recognised through the profit or loss. £4,332,000 relates to hedge ineffectiveness. See page 37 for details.
The exceptional tax credit of £2,102,000 relates to the impact of the change in UK tax rate on deferred tax balances.
The tax effect on exceptional items is a charge of £14,664,000 and primarly relates to; derivative contracts (£10,009,000 charge), and the reduction of deferred tax assets in respect of tax losses (£4,653,000 charge).
| 53 weeks | 52 weeks | |
|---|---|---|
| ended | ended | |
| 31 July | 25 July | |
| 2022 | 2021 | |
| £000 | £000 | |
| Wages and salaries | 639,366 | 520,339 |
| Employee support grants (note 24) | (4,473) | (208,986) |
| Social security costs | 41,637 | 23,380 |
| Other pension costs | 9,657 | 7,877 |
| Share-based payments | 5,874 | 10,267 |
| Redundancy and restructuring costs | – | 6,179 |
| 692,061 | 359,056 |
| Directors' emoluments 2022 |
2021 |
|---|---|
| £000 | £000 |
| Aggregate emoluments 1,984 |
1,709 |
| Aggregate amount receivable under long-term incentive schemes 527 |
181 |
| Company contributions to money purchase pension scheme 195 |
178 |
| 2,706 | 2,068 |
Employee support grants disclosed above are amounts claimed by the company under the coronavirus job retention schemes in the UK and the Republic of Ireland.
For further details of directors' emoluments including the highest paid director, please see the directors' remuneration report on pages 69–77.
| 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|
| Number | Number | |
| Full-time equivalents | ||
| Head office | 332 | 315 |
| Pub managerial | 4,648 | 4,271 |
| Pub hourly paid staff | 19,791 | 18,736 |
| 24,771 | 23,322 | |
| 2022 | 2021 | |
| Number | Number | |
| Total employees | ||
| Head office | 342 | 326 |
| Pub managerial | 4,757 | 4,377 |
| Pub hourly paid staff | 37,028 | 34,322 |
| 42,127 | 39,025 |
The totals above relate to the monthly average number of employees during the year, not the total of employees at the end of the year.
| Share-based payments | 53 weeks | 52 weeks |
|---|---|---|
| ended | ended | |
| 31 July | 25 July | |
| 2022 | 2021 | |
| Shares awarded during the year (shares) | 2,048,275 | 852,261 |
| Average price of shares awarded (pence) | 909 | 957 |
| Market value of shares vested during the year (£000) | 7,122 | 9,169 |
| Share awards not yet vested (£000) | 11,275 | 14,608 |
For details of the share incentive plan and the deferred bonus scheme, refer to the directors' remuneration report on pages 69– 77.
The shares awarded as part of the above schemes are based on the cash value of the bonuses at the date of the awards. These awards vest over three years, with their cost spread over their three-year life. The share-based payment charge above represents the annual cost of bonuses awarded over the past three years. All awards are settled in equity.
The company operates two share-based compensation plans. In both schemes, the fair values of the shares granted are determined by reference to the share price at the date of the award. The shares vest at a £Nil exercise price – and there are no market-based conditions to the shares which affect their ability to vest.
| 53 weeks | 52 weeks | |
|---|---|---|
| ended | ended | |
| 31 July | 25 July | |
| 2022 | 2021 | |
| £000 | £000 | |
| Finance costs | ||
| Interest payable on bank loans and overdrafts | 22,869 | 21,903 |
| Amortisation of bank loan and private placement issue costs (note 10) | 1,983 | 1,746 |
| Interest payable on swaps | 9,220 | 18,228 |
| Interest payable on asset-financing | 448 | 664 |
| Interest payable on private placement | 6,238 | 4,907 |
| Finance costs excluding lease interest | 40,758 | 47,448 |
| Interest payable on leases | 18,083 | 19,832 |
| Total finance costs | 58,841 | 67,280 |
| Bank interest receivable | (103) | (188) |
| Lease interest receivable | (428) | (407) |
| Total finance income | (531) | (595) |
| Net finance costs before exceptionals | 58,310 | 66,685 |
| Exceptional finance costs (note 4) | 1,000 | 12,690 |
| Exceptional finance income (note 4) | (52,859) | - |
| Total exceptional finance (income)/costs | (51,859) | 12,690 |
| Net finance costs after exceptionals | 6,451 | 79,375 |
The standard rate of corporation tax in the UK is 19.0%. The company's profits for the accounting period are taxed at a rate of 19.0% (2021: 19.0%).
| 53 weeks | 53 weeks | 53 weeks | 52 weeks | Restated1 52 weeks |
Restated1 52 weeks |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ended | ended | ended | ended | ended | ended | |
| 31 July 2022 | 31 July 2022 | 31 July 2022 | 25 July 2021 | 25 July 2021 | 25 July 2021 | |
| Before | Exceptional | After | Before | Exceptional | After | |
| exceptional | items | exceptional | exceptional | items | exceptional | |
| items | (note 4) | items | items | (note 4) | items | |
| £000 | £000 | £000 | £000 | £000 | £000 | |
| Taken through income statement | ||||||
| Current income tax: | ||||||
| Current income tax charge | 22 | – | 22 | (380) | – | (380) |
| Previous period adjustment | – | 2 | 2 | – | 1,836 | 1,836 |
| Total current income tax | 22 | 2 | 24 | (380) | 1,836 | 1,456 |
| Deferred tax: | ||||||
| Origination and reversal of temporary differences1 | (4,529) | 14,662 | 10,133 | (19,158) | (2,546) | (21,704) |
| Prior year deferred tax credit | (1,053) | – | (1,053) | (1,157) | (2,561) | (3,718) |
| Impact of change in UK tax rate | – | (2,102) | (2,102) | – | 6,336 | 6,336 |
| Total deferred tax1 | (5,582) | 12,560 | 6,978 | (20,315) | 1,229 | (19,086) |
| Tax (credit)/charge1 | (5,560) | 12,562 | 7,002 | (20,695) | 3,065 | (17,630) |
| 53 weeks | 53 weeks | 53 weeks | 52 weeks | 52 weeks | 52 weeks | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ended | ended | ended | ended | ended | ended | |
| 31 July 2022 | 31 July 2022 | 31 July 2022 | 25 July 2021 | 25 July 2021 | 25 July 2021 | |
| Before | Exceptional | After | Before | Exceptional | After | |
| exceptional | items | exceptional | exceptional | items | Exceptional | |
| items | (note 4) | items | items | (note 4) | Items | |
| £000 | £000 | £000 | £000 | £000 | £000 | |
| Taken through equity | ||||||
| Current tax | (2) | – | (2) | 6 | – | 6 |
| Deferred tax | 22 | – | 22 | (22) | – | (22) |
| Tax charge/(credit) | 20 | – | 20 | (16) | – | (16) |
| 53 weeks | 53 weeks | 53 weeks | 52 weeks | Restated1 52 weeks |
Restated1 52 weeks |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ended | ended | ended | ended | ended | ended | |
| 31 July 2022 | 31 July 2022 | 31 July 2022 | 25 July 2021 | 25 July 2021 | 25 July 2021 | |
| Before | Exceptional | After | Before | Exceptional | After | |
| exceptional | items | exceptional | exceptional | items | exceptional | |
| items | (note 4) | items | items | (note 4) | items | |
| £000 | £000 | £000 | £000 | £000 | £000 | |
| Taken through comprehensive income | ||||||
| Deferred tax charge on swaps1 | 8,404 | – | 8,404 | 6,241 | 4,049 | 10,290 |
| Impact of change in UK tax rate | 2,647 | – | 2,647 | (1,157) | – | (1,157) |
| Tax charge/(credit)1 | 11,051 | – | 11,051 | 5,084 | 4,049 | 9,133 |
1Restated 25 July 2021. See Accounting policies page 48
The taxation charge for the 53 weeks ended 31 July 2022 is based on the pre-exceptional loss before tax of £30.4m and the estimated effective tax rate before exceptional items for the 53 weeks ended 31 July 2022 of 18.3% (Restated1 2021: 14.8%). This comprises a pre-exceptional current tax rate of 0.1% (Restated1 2021: 0.2%) and a pre-exceptional deferred tax charge of 18.3% (Restated1 2021: 14.6% charge).
The UK standard weighted average tax rate for the period is 19.0% (2021: 19.0%). The current tax rate is lower than the UK standard weighted average tax rate, owing to tax losses in the period.
| 53 weeks | 53 weeks | 52 weeks | Restated1 52 weeks |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ended | ended | ended | ended | |
| 31 July 2022 | 31 July 2022 | 25 July 2021 | 25 July 2021 | |
| Before | After | Before | After | |
| exceptional | exceptional | exceptional | exceptional | |
| items £000 |
items £000 |
items £000 |
items £000 |
|
| (Loss)/profit before income tax | (30,448) | 26,269 | (167,166) | (194,636) |
| (Loss)/profit multiplied by the UK standard rate of | (5,785) | 4,991 | (31,762) | (36,981) |
| corporation tax of 19.0% (2021: 19.0%) | ||||
| Abortive acquisition costs and disposals | 498 | 498 | - | - |
| Expenditure not allowable | 1,001 | 1,001 | 1,791 | 4,680 |
| Fair value movement on SWAP disregarded for tax | – | 34 | - | - |
| Other allowable deductions | 168 | (9) | (19) | (19) |
| Non-qualifying depreciation | 60 | 4,105 | 7,029 | 7,029 |
| Capital gains - effect of reliefs | 396 | 380 | 728 | 728 |
| Share options and SIPs | (669) | (669) | 955 | 955 |
| Deferred tax on balance-sheet-only items | (162) | (162) | - | - |
| Effect of different tax rates and unrecognised losses in overseas companies |
(14) | (14) | 1,740 | 1,524 |
| Rate change adjustment1 | – | (2,102) | - | 6,336 |
| Previous year adjustment – current tax | – | 2 | - | 1,836 |
| Previous year adjustment – deferred tax | (1,053) | (1,053) | (1,157) | (3,718) |
| Total tax expense reported in the income statement1 | (5,560) | 7,002 | (20,695) | (17,630) |
1Restated 25 July 2021. See Accounting policies page 48
The deferred tax in the balance sheet is as follows:
The main rate of corporation tax is currently 19%, but this will increase to 25% from 1 April 2023. The rate increase has been substantively enacted; therefore, the deferred tax balances have been recognised at the rate they are expected to reverse. It is noted that the government intends to hold the main rate of corporation tax at 19% but this decision had not been substantively enacted at the reporting date.
| Accelerated tax depreciation |
Other temporary differences |
Interest-rate swaps |
Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| £000 | £000 | £000 | £000 | |
| At 25 July 2021 | 50,593 | 5,536 | – | 56,129 |
| Previous year movement posted to the income statement | (908) | (146) | – | (1,054) |
| Movement during year posted to the income statement | 837 | (12) | – | 825 |
| Impact of tax rate change posted to the income statement | 266 | 140 | – | 406 |
| Reclassification from deferred tax asset to deferred tax liability |
– | – | 14,834 | 14,834 |
| At 31 July 2022 | 50,788 | 5,518 | 14,834 | 71,140 |
| Share based payments |
Tax losses and interest capacity carried forward |
Interest-rate swaps |
Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| £000 | £000 | £000 | £000 | |
| At 25 July 2021 | 807 | 29,365 | 9,412 | 39,584 |
| Movement during year posted to the income statement | (139) | 875 | (10,043) | (9,307) |
| Movement during year posted to comprehensive income | – | – | (8,384) | (8,384) |
| Movement during year posted to equity | (22) | – | – | (22) |
| Impact of change in tax rate posted to income statement | – | 5,536 | (3,172) | 2,364 |
| Impact of change in tax rate posted to comprehensive income | – | – | (2,647) | (2,647) |
| Reclassification from deferred tax asset to deferred tax liability | – | – | 14,834 | 14,834 |
| At 31 July 2022 | 646 | 35,776 | - | 36,422 |
The company has recognised deferred tax assets of £36.4m (2021: £39.6m), which are expected to be offset against future profits. This includes a deferred tax asset of £35.8m (2021: £29.4m), in respect of UK tax losses and current-year interest restrictions capable of reactivation in future periods. This is on the basis that forecasts have been prepared indicating that profits will arise in the foreseeable future, enabling the assets to be utilised.
Deferred tax assets and liabilities have been offset as follows:
| 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|
| £000 | £000 | |
| Deferred tax liabilities | 71,140 | 56,129 |
| Offset against deferred tax assets | (36,422) | (39,584) |
| Deferred tax liabilities | 34,718 | 16,545 |
| Deferred tax assets | 36,422 | 39,584 |
| Offset against deferred tax liabilities | (36,422) | (39,584) |
| Deferred tax asset | - | – |
As at 31 July 2022, the company had a potential deferred tax asset of £10.9m (2021: £9.1m) relating to capital losses (gross tax losses £35.0m (2021: £26.1m)) and tax losses in the Republic of Ireland (gross tax losses £18.4m (2021: £18.3m)). Both types of losses do not expire and will be available to use in future periods indefinitely. A deferred tax asset has not been recognised, as there is insufficient certainty of recovery.
Basic earnings/(loss) per share is calculated by dividing the profit/(loss) after tax for the period by the weighted average number of ordinary shares in issue during the financial year of 128,750,155 (2021: 124,668,915) less the weighted average number of shares held in trust during the financial year of 1,924,810 (2021: 1,841,667). Shares held in trust are shares purchased by the company to satisfy employee share schemes that have not yet vested.
Diluted earnings/(loss) per share is calculated by dividing the profit/(loss) after tax for the period by the weighted average number of ordinary shares in issue during the financial year adjusted for both shares held in trust and the effects of potentially dilutive shares. For the company, the dilutive shares are those that relate to employee share schemes that have not been purchased in advance and have not yet vested. For the year ended 31 July 2022 and 25 July 2021, the shares were anti-dilutive due to the movements in the average share price against the exercise price of the share scheme. In the event of making a loss during the year, the diluted loss per share is capped at the basic earnings per share as the impact of dilution cannot result in a reduction in the loss per share.
| Weighted average number of shares | 53 weeks | 52 weeks |
|---|---|---|
| ended | ended | |
| 31 July | 25 July | |
| 2022 | 2021 | |
| Shares in issue | 128,750,155 | 124,668,915 |
| Shares held in trust | (1,924,810) | (1,841,667) |
| Shares in issue - Basic | 126,825,345 | 122,827,248 |
| Dilutive shares | - | - |
| Shares in issue - Diluted | 126,825,345 | 122,827,248 |
| 53 weeks ended 31 July 2022 | Profit/(loss) | Basic EPS | Diluted EPS |
|---|---|---|---|
| £000 | pence | pence | |
| Earnings (profit after tax) | 19,267 | 15.2 | 15.2 |
| Exclude effect of exceptional items after tax | (44,155) | (34.8) | (34.8) |
| Earnings before exceptional items | (24,888) | (19.6) | (19.6) |
| Exclude effect of property losses (note 3) | (2,142) | (1.7) | (1.7) |
| Underlying earnings before exceptional items | (27,030) | (21.3) | (21.3) |
| Restated1 52 weeks ended 25 July 2021 |
(Loss)profit | Diluted EPS | |
|---|---|---|---|
| £000 | pence | pence | |
| Earnings (loss after tax) | (177,006) | (144.1) | (144.1) |
| Exclude effect of exceptional items after tax1 | 30,535 | 24.9 | 24.9 |
| Earnings before exceptional items1 | (146,471) | (119.2) | (119.2) |
| Exclude effect of property gains (note 3) | 123 | 0.1 | 0.1 |
| Underlying earnings before exceptional items1 | (146,348) | (119.1) | (119.1) |
1Restated 25 July 2021. See Accounting policies page 48
| 53 weeks | Restated1 52 weeks |
|
|---|---|---|
| ended | ended | |
| 31 July | 25 July | |
| 2022 | 2021 | |
| £000 | £000 | |
| Profit/(loss) for the period1 | 19,267 | (177,006) |
| Adjusted for: | ||
| Tax (note 7)1 | 7,002 | (17,630) |
| Share-based charges (note 2) | 5,874 | 10,267 |
| Loss on disposal of property, plant and equipment (note 3) | 3,476 | 3,140 |
| Disposal of capitalised leases (note 3) | (7,368) | (2,200) |
| Net impairment charge (note 3) | 24,430 | 4,132 |
| Interest receivable (note 6) | (103) | (188) |
| Interest payable (note 6) | 41,395 | 45,702 |
| Lease interest receivable (note 6) | (428) | (407) |
| Lease interest payable (note 6) | 18,083 | 19,832 |
| Exceptional interest (note 6) | (51,859) | 12,690 |
| Amortisation of bank loan and private placement issue costs (note 6) | 1,983 | 1,746 |
| Depreciation of property, plant and equipment (note 13) | 71,227 | 73,193 |
| Amortisation of intangible assets (note 12) | 3,240 | 3,151 |
| Depreciation on investment properties (note 14) | 87 | 44 |
| Aborted properties costs | 2,947 | 628 |
| Cancelled principal payments (note 23) | (4,726) | (10,993) |
| Foreign exchange movements | (1,474) | - |
| Amortisation of right-of-use assets (note 23) | 42,291 | 44,532 |
| 175,344 | 10,633 | |
| Change in inventories | 452 | (3,758) |
| Change in receivables | (12,171) | 15,748 |
| Change in payables | 14,885 | 2,585 |
| Cash flow from operating activities | 178,510 | 25,208 |
1Restated 25 July 2021. See Accounting policies page 48
| 25 July | Cash | Other | 31 July | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | flows | changes | 2022 | |
| £000 | £000 | £000 | £000 | |
| Borrowings | ||||
| Cash and cash equivalents | 45,408 | (5,061) | – | 40,347 |
| Other loan receivable – due before one year | – | 803 | – | 803 |
| Asset-financing obligations – due before one year | (7,610) | 2,473 | – | (5,137) |
| Current net borrowings | 37,798 | (1,785) | – | 36,013 |
| Bank loans – due after one year | (776,871) | (49,808) | (1,937) | (828,616) |
| Asset-financing obligations – due after one year | (8,633) | 4,659 | – | (3,974) |
| Other loan receivable – due after one year | – | 2,739 | – | 2,739 |
| Private placement – due after one year | (97,768) | – | (46) | (97,814) |
| Non-current net borrowings | (883,272) | (42,410) | (1,983) | (927,665) |
| Net debt | (845,474) | (44,195) | (1,983) | (891,652) |
| Derivatives | ||||
| Interest-rate swaps assets - due after one year | – | – | 61,367 | 61,367 |
| Interest-rate swaps liability – due after one year | (37,643) | – | 35,612 | (2,031) |
| Total derivatives | (37,643) | – | 96,979 | 59,336 |
| Net debt after derivatives | (883,117) | (44,195) | 94,996 | (832,316) |
| Leases | ||||
| Lease assets – due before one year | 1,638 | (1,423) | 1,786 | 2,001 |
| Lease assets – due after one year | 9,890 | – | (626) | 9,264 |
| Lease obligations – due before one year | (65,219) | 40,049 | (23,301) | (48,471) |
| Lease obligations – due after one year | (458,596) | – | 37,014 | (421,582) |
| Net lease liabilities | (512,287) | 38,626 | 14,873 | (458,788) |
| Net debt after derivatives and lease liabilities | (1,395,404) | (5,569) | 109,869 | (1,291,104) |
The cash movement on bank loans of £49,808,000 is disclosed in the cash flow statement. The amount is the net of £50,000,000 which is shown as an advance/(repayment) under bank loans and the £192,000 of loan issue costs.
The cash movement on asset-financing of £7,132,000 is disclosed in the cash flow statement as 'asset-financing principal payments'.
Lease obligations represent long-term payables, while lease assets represent long-term receivables – both are, therefore, disclosed in the table above.
The non-cash movement in bank loans and the private placement relate to the amortisation of loan issue costs. The amortisation charge for the year of £1,983,000 is disclosed in note 6. These are arrangement fees paid in respect of new borrowings and are charged to the income statement over the expected life of the loans.
The movement in interest-rate swaps relates to the change in the 'mark to market' valuations for the year for swaps subject to hedge accounting.
| Non-cash movement in net lease liabilities 53 weeks ended 31 July 2022 | |
|---|---|
| 2022 | |
| £000 | |
| Recognition of new leases (note 23) | (4,458) |
| Freehold reversions of existing lease liabilities (note 23) | 15,740 |
| Remeasurements of existing leases liabilities (note 23) | (6,742) |
| Remeasurements of existing leases assets (note 23) | 1,160 |
| Disposal of lease (note 23) | 4,514 |
| Cancelled principal payments (note 23) | 4,726 |
| Exchange differences (note 23) | (67) |
| Non-cash movement in net lease liabilities | 14,873 |
| 26 July | Cash | Other | 25 July | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 | flows | changes | 2021 | |
| Restated | ||||
| £000 | £000 | £000 | £000 | |
| Borrowings | ||||
| Cash and cash equivalents | 174,451 | (129,043) | – | 45,408 |
| Asset-financing obligations – due before one year | (7,610) | – | – | (7,610) |
| Current net borrowings | 166,841 | (129,043) | – | 37,798 |
| Bank loans – due after one year | (870,572) | 95,401 | (1,700) | (776,871) |
| Asset-financing obligations – due after one year | (15,534) | 6,901 | – | (8,633) |
| Private placement – due after one year | (97,722) | – | (46) | (97,768) |
| Non-current net borrowings | (983,828) | 102,302 | (1,746) | (883,272) |
| Net debt | (816,987) | (26,741) | (1,746) | (845,474) |
| Derivatives | ||||
| Interest-rate swaps liability – due after one year | (82,194) | – | 44,551 | (37,643) |
| Total derivatives | (82,194) | – | 44,551 | (37,643) |
| Net debt after derivatives | (899,181) | (26,741) | 42,805 | (883,117) |
| Leases | ||||
| Lease assets – due before one year | 1,736 | (1,323) | 1,225 | 1,638 |
| Lease assets – due after one year | 11,115 | – | (1,225) | 9,890 |
| Lease obligations – due before one year | (65,343) | 18,875 | (18,751) | (65,219) |
| Lease obligations – due after one year | (507,803) | – | 49,207 | (458,596) |
| Net lease liabilities | (560,295) | 17,552 | 30,456 | (512,287) |
| Net debt after derivatives and lease liabilities | (1,459,476) | (9,189) | 73,261 | (1,395,404) |
| Non-cash movement in net lease liabilities 52 weeks ended 25 July 2021 | |
|---|---|
| 2021 | |
| £000 | |
| Recognition of new leases (note 23) | (12,162) |
| Remeasurements of existing leases liabilities (note 23) | 15,602 |
| Disposal of lease (note 23) | 15,790 |
| Cancelled principal payments (note 23) | 10,993 |
| Exchange differences (note 23) | 233 |
| Non-cash movement in net lease liabilities | 30,456 |
No final dividend has been proposed for approval at the annual general meeting for the 53 weeks ended 31 July 2022 (2021: Nil). Covenants restrict the payment of dividends while the company is part of the coronavirus large business interruption loan scheme (CLBILS). The board will continue to review the dividend policy.
| Computer | Assets | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|
| software and | under | ||
| development | construction | ||
| £000 | £000 | £000 | |
| Cost: | |||
| At 26 July 2020 | 33,417 | 804 | 34,221 |
| Additions | – | 4 | 4 |
| Transfers | 804 | (804) | – |
| Disposals | (1,474) | – | (1,474) |
| At 25 July 2021 | 32,747 | 4 | 32,751 |
| Additions | 2,875 | 429 | 3,304 |
| Disposals | (20) | – | (20) |
| At 31 July 2022 | 35,602 | 433 | 36,035 |
| Accumulated amortisation: | |||
| At 26 July 2020 | (25,326) | – | (25,326) |
| Provided during the period | (3,151) | – | (3,151) |
| Exchange differences | (1) | – | (1) |
| Disposals | 1,085 | – | 1,085 |
| At 25 July 2021 | (27,393) | – | (27,393) |
| Provided during the period | (3,240) | – | (3,240) |
| Disposals | 7 | – | 7 |
| At 31 July 2022 | (30,626) | – | (30,626) |
| Net book amount at 31 July 2022 | 4,976 | 433 | 5,409 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Net book amount at 25 July 2021 | 5,354 | 4 | 5,358 |
| Net book amount at 26 July 2020 | 8,091 | 804 | 8,895 |
The majority of intangible assets relate to computer software and software development. Examples include the development costs of the SAP accounting and property-maintenance systems and bespoke J D Wetherspoon applications.
| Freehold and long-leasehold property £000 |
Short- leasehold property £000 |
Equipment, fixtures and fittings £000 |
Assets under construction £000 |
Total £000 |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cost: | |||||
| At 26 July 2020 | 1,363,106 | 295,009 | 684,732 | 86,624 | 2,429,471 |
| Additions | 14,783 | 132 | 11,251 | 31,973 | 58,139 |
| Transfers from investment property | 5,768 | – | – | – | 5,768 |
| Transfers | 41,023 | 4,164 | 8,385 | (53,572) | – |
| Exchange differences | (1,357) | (144) | (426) | (1,157) | (3,084) |
| Disposals | (2,623) | (4,385) | (3,631) | – | (10,639) |
| Reclassification | 7,842 | (7,842) | – | – | – |
| At 25 July 2021 | 1,428,542 | 286,934 | 700,311 | 63,868 | 2,479,655 |
| Additions | 37,019 | 8,407 | 33,146 | 33,700 | 112,272 |
| Transfers from investment property | - | - | - | (2,170) | (2,170) |
| Transfers | 15,948 | 1,185 | 2,572 | (19,705) | - |
| Exchange differences | (1,257) | (53) | (201) | (242) | (1,753) |
| Transfers to assets held for sale | (1,739) | - | - | - | (1,739) |
| Disposals | (13,614) | (3,708) | (4,713) | - | (22,035) |
| Reclassification | 12,435 | (12,435) | - | - | - |
| At 31 July 2022 | 1,477,334 | 280,330 | 731,115 | 75,451 | 2,564,230 |
| Accumulated depreciation and impairment: | |||||
| At 26 July 2020 | (307,297) | (167,009) | (512,387) | – | (986,693) |
| Provided during the period | (20,281) | (10,499) | (42,413) | – | (73,193) |
| Transfers from investment property | (290) | – | – | – | (290) |
| Exchange differences | 282 | 23 | 249 | – | 554 |
| Impairment loss | (1,631) | (368) | – | – | (1,999) |
| Disposals | 874 | 2,405 | 2,513 | – | 5,792 |
| Reclassification | (4,090) | 4,090 | – | – | – |
| At 25 July 2021 | (332,433) | (171,358) | (552,038) | – | (1,055,829) |
| Provided during the period | (21,336) | (9,704) | (40,187) | - | (71,227) |
| Exchange differences | 122 | 19 | 148 | - | 289 |
| Impairment loss | (18,617) | 279 | 1,102 | (2,215) | (19,451) |
| Transfers to assets held for sale | 939 | - | - | - | 939 |
| Disposals | 3,752 | 2,288 | 1,871 | - | 7,911 |
| Reclassification | (6,960) | 6,960 | - | - | - |
| At 31 July 2022 | (374,533) | (171,516) | (589,104) | (2,215) | (1,137,368) |
| Net book amount at 31 July 2022 | 1,102,801 | 108,814 | 142,011 | 73,236 | 1,426,862 |
| Net book amount at 25 July 2021 | 1,096,109 | 115,576 | 148,273 | 63,868 | 1,423,826 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net book amount at 26 July 2020 | 1,055,809 | 128,000 | 172,345 | 86,624 | 1,442,778 |
During the period, an amount of £42,777,000 (2021: £19,692,000) was spent on the reinvestment of existing pubs. £25,773,000 (2021: £16,858,000) was spent on freehold reversions. £58,789,000 (2021: £24,051,000) was spent on investment in new pubs and pub extensions. This led to a total capital expenditure of £127,339,000 (2021: £62,671,000).
The company owns six (2021: three) freehold properties with existing tenants – and these assets have been classified as investment properties. During the year, a property which was originally recognised as part of property, plant and equipment under the category 'assets under construction' has been transferred to investment property. During the year, the company has purchased an additional two investment properties.
| £000 | |
|---|---|
| Cost: | |
| At 26 July 2020 | 11,842 |
| Additions | 4,528 |
| Transfer to property, plant and equipment | (5,768) |
| At 25 July 2021 | 10,602 |
| Transfer from property, plant and equipment | 2,170 |
| Additions | 11,763 |
| At 31 July 2022 | 24,535 |
| At 26 July 2020 | (315) |
|---|---|
| Provided during the period | (44) |
| Transfer to property, plant and equipment | 290 |
| At 25 July 2021 | (69) |
| Provided during the period | (87) |
| Impairment loss | (1,015) |
| At 31 July 2022 | (1,171) |
| Net book amount at 31 July 2022 | 23,364 |
|---|---|
| Net book amount at 25 July 2021 | 10,533 |
| Net book amount at 26 July 2020 | 11,527 |
Rental income received in the period from investment properties was £790,000 (2021: £397,000). Operating costs, excluding depreciation, incurred in relation to these properties amounted to £16,000 (2021: £12,000).
At the year end, three investment properties were independently valued at £9,431,000. During the year, an impairment charge of £1,015,000 was incurred to adjust the three investment properties which were independently valued from their net book value to their valuation amount. The remaining three investment properties purchased during the period are valued at their purchase price paid of £13,933,000. This is deemed a reasonable fair value of these properties. The total fair value of all of our investment properties at the year end is £23,364,000.
Bar, food and non-consumable stock held at pubs and the national distribution centre.
| 31 July | 25 July | |
|---|---|---|
| 2022 | 2021 | |
| £000 | £000 | |
| Goods for resale at cost | 26,402 | 26,853 |
This category relates to situations in which third parties owe the company money. Examples include rebates from suppliers (volume related discounts on certain products) and refunds from councils and governing bodies.
Prepayments relate to advance payments for certain services, for example insurance and tv licences.
| 31 July | 25 July | |
|---|---|---|
| 2022 | 2021 | |
| £000 | £000 | |
| Current (due within one year) | ||
| Other loan receivables | 803 | – |
| Other receivables | 18,601 | 2,004 |
| Rebate receivable | 1,998 | 1,499 |
| Prepayments | 7,998 | 12,924 |
| 29,400 | 16,427 | |
| Non-current (due after one year) | ||
| Other loan receivables | 2,739 | – |
| Total other non-current assets | 2,739 | – |
On 4 August 2022 a cheque was received for £11,347,000 from HMRC in relation to the historic VAT treatment of slot/fruit machines (see note 4 for further details). This cheque was dated before the year-end of 26 July 2022. However, owing to not receiving this cheque until after year-end this amount has been recognised as a receivable under 'other receivables' rather than in cash and cash equivalents in note 18.
| Credit risk | 31 July | 25 July |
|---|---|---|
| 2022 | 2021 | |
| £000 | £000 | |
| Due from suppliers – not due | 937 | 1,040 |
| Due from suppliers – overdue | 193 | 964 |
| 1,130 | 2,004 |
Credit risk is the risk that a counterparty does not settle its financial obligation with the company. At the period's end, the company has assessed the credit risk on amounts due from suppliers, based on historic experience, meaning that the expected lifetime credit loss was immaterial. Cash and cash equivalents are also subject to the impairment requirements of IFRS9 – no impairment loss was identified..
These relate to situations in which the company had exchanged contracts to sell a property, but the transaction is not yet complete. As at 31 July 2022, two sites were classified as held for sale (2021:£Nil).
| 31 July | 25 July | |
|---|---|---|
| 2022 | 2021 | |
| £000 | £000 | |
| Property, plant and equipment | 800 | – |
| 31 July | 25 July | |
|---|---|---|
| 2022 | 2021 | |
| £000 | £000 | |
| Cash and cash equivalents | 40,347 | 45,408 |
Cash at bank earns interest at floating rates, based on daily bank deposit rates.
On 4 August 2022 a cheque was received for £11,347,000 from HMRC in relation to the historic VAT treatment of slot/fruit machines (see note 4 for further details). This cheque was dated before the year-end of 26 July 2022. However, owing to not receiving this cheque until after year-end this amount has been recognised as a receivable under 'other receivables' in note 16.
This category relates to money owed by the company to third parties.
| 31 July | 25 July | |
|---|---|---|
| 2022 | 2021 | |
| £000 | £000 | |
| Trade payables | 107,886 | 111,918 |
| Other payables | 17,267 | 27,759 |
| Other tax and social security | 67,362 | 44,237 |
| Accruals | 88,758 | 74,787 |
| Deferred income | 1,208 | 1,090 |
| 282,481 | 259,791 |
Trade payables are obligations to pay for goods and services which are of a trade nature while other payables are of a nontrade nature.
Included within tax and social security is corporation tax liability owed but not yet due of £280,000 (2021: £20,383,000) and VAT due of £56,516,000 (2021: £12,069,000).
Accruals relate to allowances made by the company for future anticipated payments, for example; payments to suppliers, employees' wages and interest payments to lenders.
Deferred income comprises of money received in advance for future marketing materials and services.
| 31 July | 25 July | |
|---|---|---|
| 2022 | 2021 | |
| £000 | £000 | |
| Current (due within one year) | ||
| Other | ||
| Lease liabilities | 48,471 | 65,219 |
| Asset-financing obligations | 5,137 | 7,610 |
| Total current borrowings (including lease liabilities) | 53,608 | 72,829 |
| Non-current (due after one year) | ||
| Bank loans | ||
| Variable-rate facility | 730,000 | 680,000 |
| CLBILS | 100,033 | 100,033 |
| Unamortised bank loan issue costs | (1,417) | (3,162) |
| 828,616 | 776,871 | |
| Private placement | ||
| Fixed-rate facility | 98,000 | 98,000 |
| Unamortised private placement issue costs | (186) | (232) |
| 97,814 | 97,768 | |
| Other | ||
| Lease liabilities | 421,582 | 458,596 |
| Asset-financing obligations | 3,974 | 8,633 |
| 425,556 | 467,229 | |
| Total non-current borrowings (including lease liabilities) | 1,351,986 | 1,341,868 |
| Total borrowings (including lease liabilities) | 1,405,594 | 1,414,697 |
The carrying amounts of lease liabilities and the movements during the period are outlined in note 23.
Asset-financing obligations relate to asset finance leases of equipment in pubs.
The secured Revolving Credit Facility is £875m. As at 31 July 2022, £730m was drawn down (2021: £680m). There are 14 participating lenders. £20m matures in February 2024 while £855m matures in February 2025. The company has hedged its interest-rate liabilities to its banks by swapping the floating-rate debt into fixed-rate debt, see note 22.
On 7 August 2020 and 18 March 2021, the company agreed to secured loans under the CLBILS for £48,333,332 and £51,700,000, respectively. The loans have four participating lenders and an average fixed-interest charge of 1.94%; all of loans mature in August 2023.
Unamortised bank loan issue costs primarily relate to refinancing, securing and extending the variable-rate facility.
The fixed-rate facility relates to senior secured notes of £98m. The notes mature in 2026.
The company has an overdraft facility of £10m.
| Total | ||
|---|---|---|
| £000 | ||
| At 25 July 2021 | 3,004 | |
| Charged to the income statement: | ||
| – Additional charges | 2,781 | |
| – Unused amounts reversed | (2,588) | |
| – Used during year | (536) | |
| At 31 July 2022 | 2,661 | |
| 31 July | 25 July | |
| 2022 | 2021 | |
| £000 | £000 | |
| Current | 2,661 | 3,004 |
| Non-current | – | – |
| Total provisions | 2,661 | 3,004 |
The amounts represent a provision for ongoing legal claims brought against the company in the normal course of business, by customers and employees. Owing to the nature of the business, the company expects to have a continuous provision for outstanding employee and public liability claims. All claim provisions are considered current and are therefore not discounted.
The company has the following financial instruments. IFRS13 requires disclosure of fair value measurements by level, using the following fair value measurement hierarchy:
| 31 July | 31 July | 25 July | 25 July | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | 2022 | 2021 | 2021 | |
| Book value | Fair value | Book value | Fair value | |
| Hierachy | £000 | £000 | £000 | £000 |
| Financial assets at amortised cost | ||||
| Cash and cash equivalents | 40,347 | 40,347 | 45,408 | 45,408 |
| Receivables | 1,130 | 1,130 | 2,004 | 2,004 |
| 3 Lease assets |
11,265 | 11,378 | 11,528 | 11,643 |
| 52,742 | 52,855 | 58,940 | 59,055 | |
| Financial liabilities at amortised cost | ||||
| Trade and other payables | (213,911) | (213,911) | (214,464) | (214,464) |
| 2 Asset-financing obligations |
(9,111) | (9,111) | (16,243) | (16,406) |
| 3 Lease obligations |
(470,054) | (470,054) | (523,815) | (529,053) |
| 2 Private placement |
(97,814) | (94,166) | (97,768) | (98,746) |
| 2 Borrowings |
(828,616) | (811,795) | (776,871) | (784,639) |
| (1,619,506) | (1,599,037) | (1,629,161) | (1,643,308) | |
| Derivatives – cash flow hedges | ||||
| 2 Non-current derivative financial liability |
(2,031) | (2,031) | (37,643) | (37,643) |
| 2 Non-current derivative financial asset |
61,367 | 61,367 | - | - |
| 59,336 | 59,336 | (37,643) | (37,643) |
The fair value of derivatives has been calculated by discounting all future cash flows by the market yield curve. The fair value of borrowings and the private placement has been calculated by discounting the expected future cash flows at the year end's prevailing interest rates. The borrowings are deemed to be short-term for the purposes of the fair value calculations (see note 20 for split) given the draw down nature of the Revolving Credit Facility. The fair value of investment properties has been disclosed in note 14 (hierarchy level of 3).
The table below presents the maturity profile of the company's financial liabilities using the contractual undiscounted cash flows.
| Within | More than | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 year | 1–2 years | 2–5 years | 5 years | Total | |
| £000 | £000 | £000 | £000 | £000 | |
| At 31 July 2022 | |||||
| Borrowings | 31,750 | 51,330 | 871,461 | – | 954,541 |
| Borrowings – CLBILS | 2,599 | 100,119 | – | – | 102,718 |
| Private placement | 3,655 | 3,655 | 107,138 | – | 114,448 |
| Trade and other payables | 213,911 | – | – | – | 213,911 |
| Derivatives | 3,211 | (698) | (353) | (1,858) | 302 |
| Lease liabilities | 48,471 | 48,029 | 133,041 | 382,369 | 611,910 |
| Asset-financing obligations | 5,137 | 4,332 | – | – | 9,469 |
| At 26 July 2021 | |||||
| Borrowings | 21,798 | 21,798 | 908,406 | – | 952,002 |
| Borrowings – CLBILS | 2,005 | 2,005 | 100,138 | – | 104,148 |
| Private placement | 3,655 | 3,655 | 10,965 | 99,828 | 118,103 |
| Trade and other payables | 214,464 | – | – | – | 214,464 |
| Derivatives | 12,054 | 11,969 | 15,842 | 5,231 | 45,096 |
| Lease liabilities | 65,219 | 49,587 | 142,670 | 427,520 | 684,996 |
| Asset-financing obligations | 7,610 | 5,145 | 4,323 | – | 17,078 |
The company's capital structure comprises shareholders' equity and loans. The objective of capital management is to ensure that the company is able to continue as a going concern and provide shareholders with returns on their investment, while managing risk.
The company does not have a specific measure for managing capital structure; instead, the company plans its capital requirements and manages its loans, dividends and share buybacks accordingly. In a normal trading year, the company measures loans using a ratio of net debt to EBITDA. With covenant waivers agreed until January 2023, relaxed covenants effective April and July 2023 and returning to normal covenant levels from October 2023 management's primary metrics are liquidity until April 2023 and then profitability and net debt thereafter.
Outlined in note 20 are the facilities entered into to meet the short and long-term liquidity needs of the business. The objective is to ensure that the company has sufficient financial resources to meet working capital requirements as well as funds for reinvestment and development. The company's borrowings depend on the meeting of financial covenants, which if breached, could result in funding being withdrawn. The company has agreed on covenant waivers with its lenders as outlined above.
The company does not have a significant concentration of credit risk, as the majority of its revenue is in cash. There is little associated credit risk assigned to derivative financial assets as contracts are held with commercial bank counterparties.
The company is exposed to interest rate risk through variable rates on external borrowings. The company's interest-rate swap agreements are in place to mitigate this risk. Under these agreements, the company pays a fixed interest charge and receives variable interest income which matches the variable interest payments made on the company's borrowings.
The company has hedged its interest-rate liabilities to its banks by swapping the floating-rate debt into fixed-rate debt which has fixed £770m of these borrowings at rates of between 0.61 and 3.84%. These interest rate swaps are accounted for through a combination of fair value through profit or loss and hedging reserves within other comprehensive income. The effective weighted average interest rate of the swap agreements used during the year is 1.61% (2021: 2.42%), fixed for a weighted average period of 6.4 years (2021: 3.8 years). In addition, the company has entered into forward-starting interest-rate swaps, detailed in the table below.
| Weighted average swap by period: | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| From | To | Total swap value £m | Weighted average interest % |
| 30/07/2021 | 30/07/2023 | 770 | 1.61 |
| 30/07/2023 | 30/07/2026 | 770 | 1.10 |
| 31/07/2026 | 30/06/2028 | 770 | 1.33 |
| 01/07/2028 | 29/03/2029 | 770 | 1.32 |
| 31/03/2029 | 30/11/2031 | 770 | 1.02 |
The amounts drawn under this agreement can be varied, depending on the requirements of the business. The floating-rate borrowings are interest-bearing borrowings at rates based on SONIA, fixed for periods of up to one month. During the 53 weeks ended 31 July 2022, if the interest rates on UK-denominated borrowings had been 1% higher, with all other variables constant, pre-tax loss for the year would have been reduced by £34,000 and equity increased by £67,660,000. The movement in equity arises from a change in the 'mark to market' valuation of the interest-rate swaps into which the company has entered, calculated by a 1% shift of the market yield curve. The company notes that an increase in borrowings of 1% would also increase interest charges. The company considers that a 1% movement in interest rates represents a reasonable sensitivity to potential changes. However, this analysis is for illustrative purposes only.
An analysis of the interest-rate profile of financial liabilities, is set out below:
| 31 July | 25 July | |
|---|---|---|
| 2022 | 2021 | |
| £000 | £000 | |
| Analysis of interest-rate profile of financial liabilities | ||
| Floating rate due after one year | 728,583 | 676,839 |
| Fixed rate due after one year | 100,033 | 100,033 |
| 828,616 | 776,872 | |
| Asset-financing obligations | ||
| Fixed rate due in one year | 5,137 | 7,610 |
| Fixed-rate due after one year | 3,974 | 8,633 |
| 9,111 | 16,243 | |
| Private placement | ||
| Fixed rate due after one year | 97,814 | 97,767 |
| 97,814 | 97,767 | |
| 935,541 | 890,882 |
The below table outlines the movements in fair value among the hedging reserve, comprehensive income and the income statement during the year:
| Restated1 | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2022 | 2021 | |
| Interest-rate swaps | £000 | £000 |
| Carrying value of derivative financial instruments - Liability | (2,031) | (37,643) |
| Carrying value of derivative financial instruments - Asset | 61,367 | - |
| Change in fair value of derivatives | 96,979 | 44,551 |
| Hedge (gains)/losses recognised in comprehensive income in respect of continuing hedges Hedge (gains)/losses recognised in profit or loss in respect of hedges held at fair value through |
(48,452) | (44,551) |
| the profit or loss (Note 4) Hedge ineffectiveness reclassified from the reserve to profit or loss relating to continuing |
(48,527) | - |
| hedges (Note 4) | (8,134) | 11,707 |
| Amortisation to profit or loss of cashflow hedge reserve relating to discontinued hedge | ||
| relationships (Note 4) | 3,802 | - |
| Hedging reserve balance in respect of continuing hedges1 | (14,516) | 19,452 |
| Hedging reserve balance in respect of discontinued hedges | 899 | - |
| Restated1 | ||
| 2022 | 2021 | |
| Hedging Reserve | £000 | £000 |
| Opening | 19,452 | 66,577 |
| Hedging (gains)/losses recognised in comprehensive income Hedge ineffectiveness reclassified from the hedging reserve to profit or loss / Amortisation |
(48,452) | (44,551) |
| to profit or loss of cashflow hedge reserve relating to discontinued hedge relationships | 4,332 | (11,707) |
| Deferred tax posted to comprehensive income1 | 11,051 | 9,133 |
| Closing1 | (13,617) | 19,452 |
1Restated 25 July 2021. See Accounting policies page 48
The company has multiple interest-rate swaps which up to 25 July 2021 were designated in a combination of seven hedge relationships. In addition one new derivative was entered into during the year which has not been designated for hedge accounting. The impact on the accounts is as follows:
Remaining in the hedging reserve, is -£14,516k of fair value relating to continuing hedges (Restated1 2021: £19,452k) and £899k of fair value relating to hedges which have been discontinued (2021: £Nil). The fair value of discontinued hedges will be recycled to the income statement over the remaining period of maturity.
The company's interest-rate swaps, which swap floating interest rates paid for a fixed interest rate, were previously based on an index called the London interbank offered rate (LIBOR). The IBOR issued in September 2019 has resulted in LIBOR being replaced with an index called sterling overnight index average (SONIA). The amendments of the reform have been adopted, as at 1 January 2022, to hedging relationships which already existed, or were designated thereafter.
The amendments provided temporary relief from applying specific hedge accounting requirements to hedging relationships directly affected by IBOR reform. Hedges have still been measured for effectiveness, with any ineffectiveness being charged in the income statement. No hedges have been derecognised as a result of the IBOR reform.
The minimum lease payments under asset-financing fall due as follows:
| 31 July | 25 July | |
|---|---|---|
| 2022 | 2021 | |
| £000 | £000 | |
| Within one year | 5,137 | 7,610 |
| In the second to fifth year, inclusive | 4,332 | 9,468 |
| 9,469 | 17,078 | |
| Less future finance charges | (358) | (835) |
| Present value of lease obligations | 9,111 | 16,243 |
| Less amount due for settlement within one year | (5,137) | (7,610) |
| Amount due for settlement during the second to fifth year, inclusive | 3,974 | 8,633 |
All asset-financing obligations are in respect of various equipment used in the business. No escalation clauses are included in the agreements.
The following amounts, relating to lease cashflows, were debited/credited to the income statement during the period:
| Rent cash flow analysis | 31 July 2022 |
25 July 2021 |
|---|---|---|
| £000 | £000 | |
| Cash outflows relating to capitalised leases | 57,630 | 35,829 |
| Expense relating to short-term leases | 10 | 784 |
| Expense relating to variable element of concessions | 8,799 | 2,801 |
| Total cash outflows | 66,439 | 39,414 |
| Cash inflows relating to capitalised leases | (1,852) | (1,736) |
| Income relating to lessor sites | (2,001) | (1,609) |
| Total cash inflows | (3,853) | (3,345) |
The balance sheet shows the following amounts relating to leases. These have been reconciled in sections (a) to (d) below:
| Balance sheet position | 31 July 2022 |
25 July 2021 |
|---|---|---|
| £000 | £000 | |
| Right-of-use asset1 (a) |
419,416 | 468,538 |
| Non-current lease asset | 9,264 | 9,890 |
| Current lease assets | 2,001 | 1,638 |
| Total lease assets2 (b) (d) |
11,265 | 11,528 |
| Current lease liability | (48,471) | (65,219) |
| Non-current lease liability | (421,583) | (458,596) |
| Total lease liability1 (c) (d) |
(470,054) | (523,815) |
1Right-of-use assets and lease liabilities relate to leasehold properties occupied by J D Wetherspoon.
2Lease assets relate to leasehold properties sublet by J D Wetherspoon.
Set out below are the carrying amounts of right-of-use assets recognised and the movements during the period:
| Cost: | £000 |
|---|---|
| As at 25 July 2021 | 558,897 |
| Reclassification of prior year remeasurement1 | 3,704 |
| Restated as at 25 July 2021 | 562,601 |
| Additions | 4,458 |
| Remeasurement | 10,148 |
| Freehold reversions | (16,492) |
| Disposals and derecognised leases | (3,453) |
| At 31 July 2022 | 557,262 |
| Accumulated depreciation and impairment: | £000 |
| As at 25 July 2021 | (90,359) |
| Reclassification of prior year remeasurement | (3,704) |
| Restated as at 25 July 2021 | (94,063) |
| Provided during the period | (42,291) |
| Exchange differences | (77) |
| Impairment loss | (3,964) |
| Freehold reversions | 1,878 |
| Disposals and derecognised leases | 671 |
| At 31 July 2022 | (137,846) |
| Net book amount at 31 July 2022 | 419,416 |
| Net book amount at 25 July 2021 | 468,538 |
1A reclassiciation of prior year remeasurments has been made between cost and accumulated depreciation. This reclassification does not impact the net book value of right-of-use assets.
During the period, additions related to four new lease contracts that were signed. 41 leases were remeasured as a result of changes in the agreed payments under the lease contracts and changes in the lease terms. Exchange differences occur as a result of translating the capitalised leases in the Republic of Ireland. 13 freehold reversions took place in the year while disposals and derecognised leases totalled six. In the year ended 25 July 2021, lease additions totalled £12,162k and depreciation £44,532k.
Set out below are the carrying amounts of the lease assets recognised and the movement during the period. The company sublets several of its leases, with lease assets being the capitalised future rent receivable from sublet sites.
| £000 | |
|---|---|
| As at 26 July 2020 | 12,851 |
| Interest due in period | 413 |
| Cash inflows for the period | (1,736) |
| As at 25 July 2021 | 11,528 |
| Remeasurement of leases | 1,160 |
| Interest due in the period | 428 |
| Cash inflows for the period | (1,851) |
| At 31 July 2022 | 11,265 |
Where needed, deferral terms were agreed on with lessees in relation to COVID-19 pandemic. There are no material expected credit losses.
The interest payable and receivable shown in the table above is the interest element of the payments made and received in the period. These amounts differ from the lease interest charged/credited to the income statement in the period – see note 6. The amounts charged/credited to the income statement in the period will also include amounts due, yet not paid, in the period. The incremental borrowing rate applied to lease liabilities and assets was 1.9–3.6%, depending on the lease's length.
Set out below are the carrying amounts of lease liabilities and the movements during the period:
| Lease liability | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2022 | 2021 | |
| £000 | £000 | |
| Lease liability as at commencement of period | 523,815 | 573,146 |
| Additions | 4,458 | 12,162 |
| Freehold reversions | (15,740) | - |
| Remeasurements of leases | 6,742 | (15,602) |
| Disposals | (4,514) | (15,790) |
| Cancelled principal payments (due to expedient) | (4,726) | (10,993) |
| Exchange differences | 67 | (233) |
| Lease liabilities before payments | 510,102 | 542,690 |
| Interest payable in period: Interest expense within period (discounting |
18,083 | 19,872 |
| element) Cancelled interest expense (due to expedient) |
(501) | (2,918) |
| 17,582 | 16,954 | |
| Total cash outflow for leases in period: Lease payment commitments for period |
(62,857) | (53,602) |
| Cancelled payment commitments (due to expedient) |
5,227 | 13,911 |
| Deferred payment commitments | - | 3,862 |
| (57,630) | (35,829) | |
| Net principal payments at 31 July 2022 |
(40,048) | (18,875) |
| At 31 July 2022 | 470,054 | 523,815 |
The company has applied the rent concessions practical expedient during the financial period, allowing reductions in rent payments due on or before June 2022 to be credited to the income statement, rather than requiring remeasurement of the lease.
Included within remeasurement of leases are principal payments of £4,726k (2021: £10,993k) credited to the income statement, and a reduction in associated interest charges of £501k (2021: £2,918k) resulting in a total credit to the income statement of £5,227k (2021: £13,911k) which is disclosed in cash generated from operations, note 9. Future rental payments, up to the end of the lease, are capitalised, including any agreed increases.
Future rent payments could change as a result of open-market rent reviews or options being exercised to terminate a lease early. Any changes in the minimum unavoidable lease payments will be included as a remeasurement of the lease liability. The accounting policies (page 46) further describe the policy in relation to the termination of leases.
Set out below are the remaining maturities (period between the balance sheet date and the end of the lease) of the lease liabilities and lease assets, which are undiscounted:
| Lease liabilities | Lease assets | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 31 July 2022 |
25 July 2021 |
31 July 2022 |
25 July 2021 |
|
| £000 | £000 | £000 | £000 | |
| Within one year | 48,471 | 65,219 | 2,001 | 1,638 |
| Between one and two years | 48,029 | 49,587 | 1,332 | 1,586 |
| Between two and three years | 46,233 | 49,508 | 1,140 | 1,130 |
| Between three and four years | 43,777 | 47,872 | 1,128 | 1,084 |
| Between four and five years | 43,031 | 45,290 | 1,124 | 1,070 |
| After five years | 382,369 | 427,520 | 6,518 | 7,255 |
| Lease commitments payable / receviable | 611,910 | 684,996 | 13,243 | 13,763 |
| Discounting | (141,856) | (161,181) | (1,978) | (2,235) |
| Lease liability / lease asset | 470,054 | 523,815 | 11,265 | 11,528 |
| 31 July | 25 July | |
|---|---|---|
| 2022 | 2021 | |
| £000 | £000 | |
| Eat out to help out (note 1) | – | (23,248) |
| Local government grants (note 4) | (1,443) | (11,123) |
| Employee support grants (note 5) | (4,473) | (208,986) |
| (5,916) | (243,357) |
The government support in the table above should be viewed in context of the contribution to the economy as on page 6.
From 9 September 2020, the UK Government made available several grants to support those businesses adversely affected by the pandemic. Applications were made to the respective local authorities in line with the eligibility criteria for each scheme. The Irish Government introduced a similar grant (COVID Restrictions Support Scheme), for which the company applied for centrally. Government grants were recognised at the point at which funds were receipted. In the year, £1.4m was receipted (£1.3m in relation to the UK and £0.1m in relation to the Republic of Ireland). The grants were treated as exceptional income.
The coronavirus job retention scheme,(CJRS) and equivalent Republic of Ireland schemes, were introduced at the beginning of the pandemic to support companies in retaining employees, in the form of grants to cover a proportion of the wages and salaries of furloughed staff. The claims have been made weekly since April 2020 for weekly paid employees and monthly for salaried employees. These are accounted for as a credit to wages and salaries within employee costs. In the year, £4.5m was receipted (£0.2m in relation to the UK and £4.3m in relation to the Republic of Ireland).
At 31 July 2022, the company had £9.8m (2021: £10.0m) of capital commitments, relating to the purchase of nine (2021: eight) sites, for which no provision had been made in respect of property, plant and equipment.
The company had some other sites in the property pipeline; however, any legal commitment is contingent on planning and licensing. Therefore, there are no commitments at the balance sheet date.
J D Wetherspoon is the owner of the share capital of the following companies:
| Company name | Country of incorporation | Ownership | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| J D Wetherspoon (Scot) Limited | Scotland | Wholly owned | Dormant |
| J D Wetherspoon Property Holdings Limited | England | Wholly owned | Dormant |
| Moon and Spoon Limited | England | Wholly owned | Dormant |
| Moon and Stars Limited | England | Wholly owned | Dormant |
| Moon on the Hill Limited | England | Wholly owned | Dormant |
| Moorsom & Co Limited | England | Wholly owned | Dormant |
| Sylvan Moon Limited | England | Wholly owned | Dormant |
| Checkline House (Head Lease) Limited | Wales | Wholly owned | Dormant |
All of these companies are dormant and contain no assets or liabilities and are, therefore, immaterial. As a result, consolidated accounts have not been produced. The company has an overseas branch in the Republic of Ireland.
The registered office of all of the above companies is the same as that for J D Wetherspoon plc, as disclosed on the final page of these accounts.
As required by IAS 24, the following information is disclosed about key management compensation.
| Key management compensation | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|
| £000 | £000 | |
| Short-term employee benefits | 2,950 | 2,493 |
| Post-employment pension benefits | 611 | 280 |
| Share-based payment | 300 | 273 |
| 3,861 | 3,046 |
Key management comprises the executive directors, non-executive directors and management board, as detailed on page 65.
For additional information about directors' emoluments, please refer to the directors' remuneration report on pages 69–77.
Details of the shares held by executive members of the board of directors' are included in the remuneration report on pages 69– 77 which forms part of these financial statements.
| Number of | Share | |
|---|---|---|
| shares | capital | |
| 000s | £000 | |
| At 26 July 2020 | 120,380 | 2,408 |
| Issue of shares | 8,370 | 167 |
| At 25 July 2021 | 128,750 | 2,575 |
| At 31 July 2022 | 128,750 | 2,575 |
The total authorised number of 2p ordinary shares is 500,000,000 (2021: 500,000,000). All issued shares are fully paid.
While the memorandum and articles of association allow for preferred, deferred or special rights to attach to ordinary shares, no shares carried such rights at the balance sheet date.
On 23 September 2022, the government announced a growth plan which included an intention for the main rate of corporation tax to remain at 19%. This announcement does not affect the year ended 31 July 2022 and the change has not been substantively enacted at the reporting date.
On 26 September 2022, the company announced that 32 of its pubs will be put on the market as part of a one-off disposal programme. Mangaement has concluded this to be a non-adjusting event on the basis that events and conditions arose after the end of the financial period. Of the 32 pubs being marketed, 10 are freehold and 22 are leasehold units. A reasonable estimate of the financial effect cannot be made at this time, while valuations are still being determined,
The financial statements of J D Wetherspoon plc (the 'Company') for the 53 weeks ended 31 July 2022 were authorised for issue by the board of directors on 6 October 2022, and the balance sheet was signed on the board's behalf by John Hutson and Ben Whitley.
J D Wetherspoon plc is a public limited company, incorporated and domiciled in England and Wales. The Company's ordinary shares are traded on the London Stock Exchange.
The Company's financial statements have been prepared in accordance with the UK-adopted international accounting standards and have been prepared in accordance with the requirements of the Companies Act 2006.
The financial statements have been prepared on the going-concern basis, using the historical cost convention, except for the revaluation of financial instruments.
The principal accounting policies adopted by the Company are set out on pages 43–48. The accounting policies which follow set out those policies which apply in preparing the financial statements for the year ended 31 July 2022.
These policies have been consistently applied to all of the years presented, unless otherwise stated.
The directors have made enquiries into the adequacy of the Company's financial resources, through a review of the Company's budget and medium-term financial plan, including capital expenditure plans and cash flow forecasts.
The Company has modelled a base forecast in which, over the period to 28 January 2024 as it continues to emerge from the pandemic, sales, profit and cash flow growth continues. The Company has anticipated within this forecast continued high levels of inflation, particularly on food products, wages and repairs.
A more cautious scenario has been analysed, in which sales decline by 5% in the next 12 months, compared with FY19. The Company has reviewed, and is satisfied with, the mitigating actions which it could take if such a decline were to occur. Such actions could include reducing discretionary expenditure and/or implementing price increases.
The directors are satisfied that the Company has sufficient resources (eg profitability/liquidity) to withstand adjustments to the base forecast, as well as the downside scenario.
The Company has agreed with its lenders to replace normal financial covenant tests with a minimum liquidity covenant for the period up to and including January 2023, and relaxed leverage covenant tests for the second half of the financial year to 30 July 2023. The Company is confident that it will be in a position to return to normal financial covenant tests thereafter. The Company has re-financing options available including possible extensions on the revolving credit facility.
As a result, the directors have satisfied themselves that the Company will continue in operational existence for the foreseeable future. For this reason, the Company continues to adopt the going-concern basis in preparing its financial statements.
The key judgements made in preparing the financial statements are detailed below.
The Company hedge accounts for interest-rate swaps if it meets the specified qualifying criteria outlined by IFRS 9. When these criteria are met, the Company is required to measure the effectiveness of the hedged relationship, which is defined as the extent to which changes in the fair value of the interest-rate swap offset changes in the fair value of the hedged item, being the drawdowns of borrowings. Management makes judgements in forecasting drawdowns of future borrowings, as well as future interest rates. Changes in these forecasts may result in all or part of the gain or loss, which was originally reported in comprehensive income, being deemed ineffective and therefore transferred to the income statement. Once deemed ineffective, the adjustment cannot be reversed. As outlined in note 22, hedge ineffectiveness of £8,134k has been recognised within the income statement in the period.
The application of the IBOR reform amendments are further discussed on page 37.
A degree of judgement is required in determining whether certain transactions merit separate presentation to allow shareholders to better understand financial performance in the year, when compared with that of previous years and trends.
The areas where the Company has made significant estimates are listed below.
Impairment of property, plant and equipment The Company recognised impairment charges of £26,836k (2021: £4,132k) and impairment reversals of £3,420k during the period (2021: £Nil). Impairment tests are performed at the end of each reporting period, when there are indicators to do so. Impairments are made if future cash flows are lower than the carrying value of assets. Impairment reversals are made if future cash flows are higher than the carrying value of assets and the previous impairments made. Management exercises judgement in determining future cash flows. Assets include property, plant and equipment, right-of-use-assets and other intangible assets. Each pub is treated as a separate cash generating unit. Cash flows are discounted by the Company's weighted average cost of capital (WACC) of 10.2% (2021: 8.7%). For leasehold pubs, a combination of both the WACC and the internal rate of borrowing (IBR) per specific lease is used. Both WACC and IBR are independently calculated. In some instances, management recognises impairment through obtaining the fair value less costs of disposal for an individual pub. On these occasions, external valuations are obtained.
Sensitivity analysis has been performed to determine the theoretical impact on impairment should scenarios occur which are alternative to those included within the impairment workings. These sensitivities have been applied to the properties impaired during the period: A 25% reduction of year one future cash flows would increase the impairment charge by £1,267k. An increase of 0.8% in the WACC would increase the impairment charge by £2,582k.
The below sensitivity has been applied to the properties included in the company's watch list. The determination of the watch list considers both quantitative and qualitative factors: A 25% reduction of year one future cash flows would increase the impairment charge by £3,438k.
If a previously recognised impairment charge is reversed, the value of the pub will be increased to the lower of the book value as if the asset had not been impaired and the future cash flows which the pub would generate.
The Company operates predominantly one type of business (pubs) in the United Kingdom and the Republic of Ireland. The company does not separately disclose the results of the hotel business or Republic of Ireland trading given the size, sensitive nature and level of review by the board.
The Company presents, on the face of the income statement, those items of income and expense which, because of the nature and magnitude of the event
giving rise to them, merit separate presentation to allow shareholders to better understand the elements of financial performance in the year. This helps to facilitate comparison with previous years and to better assess trends in financial performance. Impairment charges, reversals of fixed assets and fair value movements in interest-rate swaps are reported as exceptional, regardless of magnitude, to provide consistency of treatment with previous years and a better understanding for the financial statement's users.
The Company defines property gains and losses as those items of income and expenditure which are the result of owning and leasing assets which are nonrecurring in nature. These include the impairment of fixed assets, along with the proceeds and costs from the disposal of assets. These items are presented on the face of the income statement to more clearly show the Company's underlying performance. The Company does not consider these costs to be operating in nature.
Fixed assets include property, plant and equipment, intangible assets and investment properties'. They are all stated at cost, less accumulated depreciation and any impairment in value.
Cost of assets includes acquisition costs, as well as other directly attributable costs in bringing the asset into use.
| assets are categorised as: Description |
|
|---|---|
| Depreciation policy | |
| (straight line) | |
| Land, buildings and | Depreciated to their |
| structural/building | estimated residual |
| improvement | values over 50 |
| assets at freehold | years. Land is not |
| and long | depreciated. |
| leasehold pubs. | |
| Structural/building | Depreciated over |
| improvement | the lease period. |
| assets at leasehold | |
| pubs. | |
| Assets within pubs | Depreciated over 3 |
| including kitchen, | to 10 years. |
| bar and cellar | |
| equipment, | |
| furniture, IT | |
| software and IT | |
| hardware. | |
| Assets at sites | Assets are not |
| which are not yet | depreciated until |
| trading and/or | they are ready for |
| extension works to | use. |
| existing pubs. | |
Residual values and useful economic lives are reviewed and adjusted, if appropriate, at each balance sheet date.
Profits and losses on disposal of fixed assets reflect the difference between the net selling price and the carrying amount at the date of disposal and are recognised in the income statement.
The carrying value of fixed assets is reviewed annually for impairment, with any impairment losses recognised in the income statement.
Where the value of an asset will be recovered through a sale transaction, rather than continuing use, the asset is classified as held for sale. It is the view of management that the Company is not committed to selling a site until a contract for sale has been exchanged. Assets held for sale are valued at the lower of book value and fair value, less any costs of disposal, and are no longer depreciated.
Inventories are stated at the lower of cost and net realisable value. Cost is calculated on a weighted average basis, with net realisable value being the estimated selling price, less any costs of disposal. Provision is made for obsolete, slow-moving or damaged inventory, where appropriate.
Bar and food inventory is recognised as an expense when sold. Non-consumable inventory is recognised as an expense immediately on receipt at a pub or hotel.
Provisions are recognised when the Company has a present legal or constructive obligation as a result of a past event and it is probable that an outflow of resources will be required to settle the obligation and a reliable estimate can be made of that obligation's amount.
Revenue is recognised when bar and food products are served to customers, after deducting discounts and sales-based taxes.
Slot/fruit machine sales are recognised as the net proceeds taken from the machines, after deducting gaming duty.
Revenue from hotel rooms is recognised when rooms are occupied and services are provided, after deduction of discounts and sales-based taxes.
The Company operates a gift card scheme – revenue from these cards is deferred until the card is redeemed in pubs.
Except for hotel revenue, which is generally received in advance of occupation, all other payments for goods and services are received at the point of sale.
There are no significant judgements or estimations made in calculating and recognising revenue. Revenue is not materially accrued or deferred between one accounting period and the next.
Monetary and non-monetary resources transferred to the Company by government, government agencies or similar bodies are recognised at fair value, when the
Company receives the grant. Grants will be recognised net in the income statement, on a systematic basis, over the same period during which the expenses, for which the grant was intended to compensate, are recognised.
Grants are disclosed in the note 24 to the accounts on page 41, which discloses government support.
The Company has leases for properties across the UK and the Republic of Ireland. There are no other material leases recognised under other IFRS 16 categories.
On completion of a contract (the point at which a contract becomes legally binding), the Company assesses whether the contract is or contains a lease. A lease is present where the contract conveys, over a period of time, the right to control the use of an identified asset in exchange for a consideration.
The lease liability is measured initially at the present value of unavoidable lease payments over the term of the lease which in all cases is to the end of the lease. These payments are discounted at the Company's incremental borrowing rate. For sites at which rent is payable as a percentage of revenue, the lease liability is measured at the present value of the unavoidable minimum guarantee payments over the term of the lease. While any amounts above this minimum amount will be expensed to the income statement.
Where a lease is identified, the Company recognises a right-of-use asset and a corresponding lease liability. The lease assets are presented as a separate line in the balance sheet.
Leases with terms of under one year are not capitalised.
Leases, where the lessor retains substantially all of the asset's risks and benefits of ownership, are classified as operating leases. If the operating lease is subject to fixed uplifts over the term of the lease, rental payments are charged to the income statement on a straight-line basis, over the period of the lease, in line with adopted accounting standards. If the operating lease is subject to open-market rents, rental payments are charged at the prevailing rates.
Leases where the lessor transfers substantially all of the asset's risks and benefits of ownership are classified as lease assets. This occurs when the Company sublets a leasehold site. The lease asset is measured initially at the present value of lease receipts, discounted at the Company's incremental
borrowing rate. The lease assets are presented as a separate line in the balance sheet.
When the Company agrees to a term extension or a change to the minimum payments made under a lease, the lease liability or asset will be remeasured on that date; the resulting increase or decrease to the asset or liability will be accounted for with an offsetting adjustment to the right-of-use asset. Reasurement is completed at the new incremental borrowing rate. Any remeasurement adjustment which reduces the right-ofuse asset below zero will be credited to the income statement.
The Company has adopted the amendment to IFRS 16 which provides lessees with an exemption from assessing whether a COVID-19 related rent concession is a lease modification.
Applying the practical expedient, the Company has recognised the rent forgiveness as a variable lease payment in accordance with IFRS 16. There is a corresponding adjustment to the lease liability, derecognising the part of the lease liability which has been forgiven, with the corresponding adjustment to operating expenses.
Where amounts have been deferred they do not extinguish the lessee's liability or substantially change the consideration of the lease. These have been accounted for as an increase in the accrual for rent outstanding.
The Company stopped the application of COVID-19 related rent concession in June 2022.
The right-of-use asset comprises the initial measurement of the corresponding lease liability, any initial direct costs and the cost of any obligation to restore the site at the end of the lease. They are subsequently measured at cost less accumulated depreciation and impairment losses. Right-of-use assets are depreciated over the term of the lease.
Where the Company notifies the landlord to purchase the freehold of a leasehold site, the lease is derecognised with any difference in the value of the lease liability and the right-of-use asset charged to the income statement as a property gain or loss.
Where the Company notifies the landlord of the intention to terminate (break) a lease early, the lease is remeasured.
Borrowing costs are recognised as an expense in the period in which they are incurred, unless the requirements by the adopted accounting standards for the capitalisation of borrowing costs relating
to assets are met. For the purpose of cash flow reporting, interest paid and received is considered to be operating cash flows.
Current tax assets and liabilities are measured at the amount expected to be recovered from, or paid to, the taxation authorities, based on tax rates and laws which are enacted or substantively enacted by the balance sheet date.
Deferred income tax is recognised on all temporary differences arising between the tax bases of assets and liabilities and their carrying amounts in the financial statements, with the following exceptions:
Where the temporary difference arises from an asset or liability in a transaction which, at the time of the transaction, affects neither accounting nor taxable profit or loss.
Deferred income tax assets are recognised only to the extent that it is probable that taxable profit will be available against which the deductible temporary differences, carried-forward tax credits or tax losses can be utilised.
Deferred income tax assets and liabilities are measured at the tax rates which are expected to apply when the related asset is realised or liability settled, based on tax rates and laws enacted or substantively enacted at the balance sheet date.
Income tax is charged or credited directly to the income statement, comprehensive income or equity. The income tax charged or credited will follow the accounting treatment of the underlying item which has given rise to the income tax charged or credited.
Financial assets and liabilities are recognised on the date on which the Company becomes party to the contractual provisions of the instrument giving rise to the asset or liability.
Financial assets held at amortised cost are nonderivative financial assets which are held within a business model where the objective is to collect the contractual cash flow at the same time as the contractual terms give rise to cash flows which are solely payments of principal and interest. They are included in current assets, except for maturities greater than 12 months after the balance sheet date. These are classified as non-current assets.
Other receivables are recognised initially at transaction value and carried at amortised cost less any expected credit losses. The Company has a small number of receivables at any one time; these are generally with companies with which the Company has an established trading relationship.
Cash and short-term deposits in the balance sheet comprise cash at bank and in hand and short-term deposits. For the purpose of the cash flow statement, cash and cash equivalents comprise cash and short-term deposits as defined above. Bank overdrafts are shown within current financial liabilities on the balance sheet. Cash and cash equivalents include recognition of amounts for cash in transit, including electronic card payments not yet receipted as these are highly liquid and low credit risk.
Credit risk losses arise when debtors fail to pay their obligation to the Company. The Company assesses credit risk, based on historic experience. The Company has no significant history of non-payment; as a result, the expected credit losses on financial assets are not material.
The Company classifies its financial liabilities as other financial liabilities. These are measured at fair value on initial recognition and subsequently measured at amortised cost, using the effective-interest method.
These are recognised initially at fair value and subsequently at amortised cost, using the effective-interest method.
Interest-bearing bank loans and other borrowings are recorded initially at fair value of consideration received, net of direct issue costs. Borrowings are subsequently recorded at amortised cost, with any difference between the amount recorded initially and the redemption value recognised in the income statement over the period of the bank loans, using the effectiveinterest method.
Bank loans and loan notes are classified as current liabilities, unless the Company has an unconditional right to defer settlement of the liability for at least 12 months after the balance sheet date.
Derivative financial instruments used by the Company are stated at fair value on initial recognition and at subsequent balance sheet dates.
Hedge accounting is used to mitigate the Company's exposure to variable interest rate risks on borrowings. Derivatives qualify for hedge accounting only where, at inception, there is formal designation and documentation of the hedging relationship, there is an economic relationship between the item being hedged and the hedging derivative and credit risk does not dominate the economic relationship.
The Company classifies its interest-rate swap derivatives as cash flow hedges, on the basis they hedge the exposure to variable cash flows. A hedging ratio of 1:1 is adopted between the interest-rate swaps and the Company's floating-rate borrowings, meaning that floating interest rates paid should be identical to those amounts received for a given amount of borrowings.
The Company tests hedge effectiveness prospectively using the hypothetical derivative method and compares the changes in the fair value of the hedging instrument with those in the fair value of the hedged item attributable to the hedged risk.
Hedges could be deemed ineffective if the: Period over which the borrowings were drawn were changed. This could result in the borrowings being made at a different floating rate than the interest-rate swap.
Gross amount of borrowings were less than the value swapped.
Impact of LIBOR reform were to cause a mismatch between the interest rate of the swaps and that of the company's debt.
The effective element of any gain or loss from remeasuring the derivative designated as the hedging instrument is recognised in other comprehensive income with the ineffective element recognised immediately in the income statement.
Hedge accounting is discontinued when the hedge expires, is sold, terminated or no longer meets the Company's risk management objective.
Ordinary shares are classified as equity. Incremental costs directly attributable to the issue of new shares or options are shown in equity as a deduction, net of tax, from the proceeds.
When the Company repurchases its own shares, the cost of the shares purchased and associated transaction costs are taken directly to equity and deducted from retained earnings. The nominal value of shares purchased is transferred from share capital to the capital redemption reserve.
Transactions denominated in foreign currencies are recorded at the rates of exchange prevailing at the transaction date. Monetary assets and liabilities are translated at year-end exchange rates, with the resulting exchange differences taken to the income statement.
The Irish branch's results are translated at the average exchange rate for the reporting period; the balance sheet is translated at the year-end exchange rate. Resulting exchange differences are recognised in comprehensive income.
Revaluation gains and losses on the long-term financing of the Irish branch are recognised in comprehensive income.
Contributions to personal pension schemes are recognised in the income statement in the period in which they fall due. All contributions are in respect of a defined contribution scheme. Once the contributions have been paid, the Company has no future payment obligations.
Dividends recommended by the board, but unpaid at each period end, are not recognised in the financial statements until they are paid (in the case of the interim dividend) or approved by shareholders at the annual general meeting (in the case of the final dividend).
These are both the cash and non-cash movements of the year, including movements in asset-financing, borrowings, cash and cash equivalents.
The Company has an employee share incentive plan which awards shares to qualifying employees; there is also a deferred bonus scheme which awards shares to directors and senior managers, subject to specific performance criteria.
The cost of the awards in respect of these plans is measured by reference to the fair value at the date at which they are granted and is amortised as an expense over the vesting period. In assessing the initial fair value, no account is taken of any vesting conditions, other than market conditions linked to the price of the shares of the Company.
The Company currently has no other share-based transactions.
Shares purchased for share-based payment awards are held in equity at historic cost, until the awards vest, when they are transferred to employees.
Amendments to IFRS9, IAS39 and IFRS7 Interest Rate Benchmark Reform (Phase 2) COVID-19 Related Rent Concessions beyond 30 June 2021 (Amendments to IFRS 16)
New accounting standards and interpretations which are in issue but not yet effective are listed below. The Company has chosen not to adopt these early: Disclosure of Accounting Policies (Amendments to IAS1 and IFRS Practice Statement 2)
Classification of Liabilities as Current or Non-current (IAS 1)
Definition of Accounting Estimates (Amendments to IAS8)
Deferred Tax related to Assets and Liabilities arising from a Single Transaction (Amendments to IAS12) Plant and Equipment – Proceeds before Intended Use (Amendments to IAS16)
Onerous Contracts – Cost of Fufilling a contract (Amendments to IAS37)
The Company uses several alternative performance measures (APM's) throughout the annual report and accounts which are not defined by International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS). APMs are used in conjunction with IFRS measures in reporting financial information and assessing performance, but are not given greater prominence. The APMs used have been defined below, alongside reconciliations to IFRS measures:
Free cash flow - the calculation of free cash flow is based on the net cash generated by business activities and available for investment in new pub developments and extensions to current pubs, after funding interest, corporation tax, lease principal payments, loan issue costs, all reinvestment in information technology, head office and pubs trading at the start of the period (excluding extensions) and the purchase of own shares under the employee share incentive plan. See reconciliation on page 12.
Like for like – compares year on year performance of pubs and hotels which were trading in the equivalent weeks in both FY22 and FY21.
Before exceptional items – this measure excludes exceptional items, which are presented separately to allow shareholders to better understand financial performance in the year, when compared with that of previous years and trends. See exceptional items reconciliation on page 17.
The income tax credit within the Income Statement for the 52 weeks ended 25 July 2021 has been restated from £13,581k to £17,630k. This is due to the prior year deferred tax on hedges being incorrectly allocated between the other comprehensive income and the Income Statement.
The disclosures impacted have been identified throughout the financial statements. The effect on specific financial statement line items within the Income Statement, Statement of Comprehensive Income and Balance Sheet are as follows:
| Reported in 52 weeks ended 25 July 2021 |
Restatement | Restated 52 weeks ended 25 July 2021 |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Income Statement1 | £000 | £000 | £000 |
| Income tax credit | 13,581 | 4,049 | 17,630 |
| Loss for the period | (181,055) | 4,049 | (177,006) |
| Loss per ordinary share – basic (p) | (147.4) | 3.3 | (144.1) |
| Loss per ordinary share – diluted (p) | (147.4) | 3.3 | (144.1) |
| Statement of Comprehensive Income | |||
| Tax on items taken to OCI | (5,084) | (4,049) | (9,133) |
| Net gain recognised directly in OCI | 47,664 | (4,049) | 43,615 |
| Balance Sheet | |||
| Hedging reserve | (15,403) | (4,049) | (19,452) |
| Retained earnings | (91,256) | 4,049 | (87,207) |
| 1 After exceptional items |
The Company's strategy is to seek a return on capital in excess of the cost of the capital which will provide funds for developments, dividends and reinvestment.
The Company operates pubs in the UK and the Republic of Ireland and aims to sell high-quality products, at reasonable prices, in well-maintained premises.
A review of the Company's business and the key measures of its performance, sometimes called key performance indicators (KPIs), can be found in the chairman's statement under the financial performance section. The chairman's statement also discusses those trends and factors likely to affect the future development, performance and position of the Company.
Wetherspoon provides jobs for over 40,000 people, paying a reasonable percentage of its profits as bonus for those working in our pubs and head office, training large numbers of staff and paying a significant percentage of our sales as taxes to the government.
Further information about these policies are published on: jdwetherspoon.com
The Company is committed to operating ethically and sustainably and to finding ways, over time, to reduce our carbon emissions. The Company is committed to achieve net zero emissions in the UK and Ireland by 2050 and will, if possible, reach this goal sooner.
We are currently developing a net-zero road map. In October 2021 the Company committed to the Science Based Targets initiative for all pub operations and the global supply chain. Agreeing on science based targets will ensure that the Company follows a credible and scientifically verified carbon-reduction pathway. As part of the plan we will work with our suppliers, building designers, equipment providers, employees and other business partners to minimise any effects. The Company is working with an organisation called Carbon Intelligence and expects to make the submission to the Science Based Targets Initiative in January 2023. In addition, the Company is a Zero Carbon Forum member, a non-profit-making organisation which is supporting the hospitality industry to comply with government reporting requirements and implement a roadmap to net-zero carbon emissions.
The Company has been recognised for reducing its greenhouse gas emissions. It has been listed in the 2022 FT-Statista Europe's Climate Leaders list, highlighting companies which, over a five-year period, have achieved the greatest reduction in emissions.
Overall the company has achieved a reduction of 23.6% in Scope 1 and Scope 2 emissions since 2019. The Company is focused on reducing annual electricity, gas and water consumption through a combination of operational initiatives and the introduction of energyefficient technology. This approach will also reduce carbon emissions.
The Company has an energy and environment group, which meets regularly, chaired by the finance director, Ben Whitley.
Each pub has an energy, environment and recycling champion, responsible for reducing consumption at his or her pub and communicating ideas and initiatives to staff. These energy champions help to encourage changes in behaviour, like using 'fire up' and 'power down' guides to ensure that pubs minimise energy consumption when they are closed. Each pub receives a monthly report, detailing the amount of electricity and gas consumed, highlighting periods of excessive consumption and communicating ideas about how to reduce consumption.
Several pieces of energy-saving technology are now installed as standard in any new pubs and will be retrospectively fitted into existing pubs across the estate. These include:
free-air cellar-cooling systems (these cool the cellar by bringing in outside air, when the external temperatures are low enough)
Cheetah extraction management systems controlling ventilation in kitchens
The Company trials new ideas and energy-saving technology consistently to reduce consumption and CO2 emissions, these have included:
With effect from October 2022, all electricity supplied to the Company's pubs in the UK, head office, and the UK distribution centre will have been generated from 100% renewable sources.
Water usage is monitored in pubs and head office. Where possible, we are installing low-flow or push button taps, along with toilets which require less water to flush. In addition, the Company is trialling data management systems which help to pinpoint water consumption changes which may indicate a change in behaviour or a supply leak.
Scope 3 emissions are the largest contributor to the Company's overall carbon emissions, representing an estimated 89% of our total output, however measuring carbon emissions in our supply chain is complex.
As our starting point we are allocating carbon emissions to every product which we sell, including food, drinks and hotel rooms. Where detailed data is not currently available, we are making assumptions based on industry averages. Over time, this data quality will improve. Reducing our scope 3 emissions will rely ultimately on a partnership approach with our UK and worldwide suppliers and on their own plans to reduce carbon emissions.
As a business, we aim to minimise waste and maximise recycling. Our target is to recycle 95% of recyclable waste.
The pubs and head office segregate waste into a minimum of seven streams: glass, tin/cans, cooking oil, paper/cardboard, plastic, lightbulbs and general waste. In addition, food waste is also separated and sent for anaerobic digestion. Any remaining non-recyclable waste is sent to waste-to-energy power plants which reduce CO2 and the use of fossil fuels. No waste is sent to landfill.
The Company has a national distribution centre for food, some bottled drinks and non-consumable products. This also includes a recycling centre. When making deliveries to pubs, lorries collect mixed recycling, used cooking oil, textiles and aluminium for return to the recycling centre for processing.
During the financial year 2021/22, the pubs sent 10,681 tonnes of waste to the recycling centre, an increase of 4,723 tonnes, or 79%, on the previous year.
Any unwanted, yet fit-for-consumption, food is donated to our charity partner FareShare, which distributes it to food banks, community centres and others in need.
Cooking oil is converted to biodiesel for agricultural use.
The volume of paper used to print menus and other marketing materials has reduced by about 35% in the last three years, partly through improved management at pub level and also changing customer habits.
The Company has set the following targets by 2025:
100% of plastic packaging to be reusable, recyclable or compostable
70% of plastic packaging to be effectively recycled or composted
30% average recycled content across plastic packaging
Action, through redesign, innovation or alternative (reuse) delivery models, to elimate problematic or unnecessary single-use plastic items
To date, the following steps have been taken to reduce the use of single-use plastics:
Plastic straws were removed in December 2017 and replaced with 100% biodegradable and 100% recyclable paper straws and wrappers.
Complimentary water fountains available in all pubs, offering an alternative to plastic water bottles.
Plastic containers used in the kitchen are now reusable.
The Company no longer uses cling film.
Plastic milk cartons are segregated and recycled separately. Coloured lids have been replaced with clear recyclable lids.
Working with suppliers and with the support of WRAP and the Sustainable Restaurant Association to reduce and, where possible, remove the use of plastic packaging for food.
The Company does not create any toxic emissions or waste. Electronic waste is disposed of using specialised contractors to safely dispose of the items.
Where possible, computer equipment is sent suppliers to refurbish and reuse. Any disposal is compliant with the EU Waste from Electrical and Electronic Equipment (WEEE) directive.
On construction sites, there is a site waste management plan, managed by the main contractor and covering all waste disposal from sites.
The Company is committed to respecting human rights across our business by complying with all relevant laws and regulations. The Company prohibits any form of discrimination, forced, trafficked or child labour and is committed to safe and healthy working conditions for all individuals, whether employed by the Company directly or by a supplier in our supply chain.
The Company has comprehensive measures to meet its statutory requirements across all areas of its operation and also those expected by our customers and employees, as necessary, for the long-term success of the business. Risks in this area can occur from corruption, bribery and human rights abuses, including discrimination, harassment and bullying.
The Company has training programmes for all employees. It also has a documented whistleblowing programme, documented processes and procedures and a supply chain audit programme.
All employees are encouraged to participate in the business, some examples of how this is achieved being:
Several Company initiatives to encourage employees to suggest small and continuous improvements to the running of their pubs
'Tell Tim' suggestion scheme for all employees Pub managers, area managers and other pub employees attending and contributing to weekly operations meetings, hosted by the chairman or chief executive
Area managers invited to meet the
board of directors (before each board meeting) Regular liaison meetings held with employees, at all levels, to gain feedback on aspects of the business and ideas for improvement
Directors and senior management completing regular visits to pubs – and pub employees regularly visiting head office
The appointment this year of two employee directors to the full board of the Company and two associate employee directors
Weekly e-mail from the chief executive
to all employees
Employee-related measures being
part of the pub bonus scheme
Head-office staff completing regular pub and kitchen shifts (both front of house and in the kitchen) to help in understanding any staff/customer issues
Pub employees involved in the decision-making process for key business issues
The table below shows the breakdown of directors, senior managers and employees at the end of the period.
| Male | Female | |
|---|---|---|
| Directors | 7 | 2 |
| Senior managers | 558 | 382 |
| All employees | 19,998 | 22,750 |
Section 172 of the Companies Act 2006 requires that directors of a Company act in good faith to promote the success of the Company for all stakeholders.
In the period, all directors of the Company have acted in a manner most likely to achieve the long-term success of the business for its shareholders, employees, customers, suppliers and the wider community in which the Company operates.
In the period, the directors have taken decisions in a number of areas, including: the safe operation of its pubs and compliance with COVID-19 legislation and guidance and loan waivers and liquidity.
Wherever practical, directors consult widely among the Company's employees, about decisions made about the Company. The directors believe that wide consultation and a management team with extensive industry experience are likely to result in the best longterm decisions. The Company's senior management team regularly engages with pub-based employees through meetings, pub visits and surveys.
Most of the Company's employees are customers and many are shareholders. The Company encourages its employees to feed back their views, as well as those of their friends and familiy. The Company operates a suggestion scheme whereby any employee can send in ideas and/or make a recommendation for the improvement of the Company.
Details of the Company's employment policy are disclosed on pages 83-84. Information on employee engagement can be found above.
Where possible, the Company forms long-term relationships with suppliers, so that all parties have a more certain environment in which to operate. The Company's responsible retailing policy is published on the website.
The Company communicates with its customers through its website and Wetherspoon News. A special magazine edition of which focuses on press misrepresentations.
Information on human rights, environmental and social matters, food safety, cyber security and reputational matters is provided in this strategic report, while further information is published on our website. Information on shareholder engagement is provided in the corporate governance report. Questions and answers from the interim results investor roadshow (March 2022) were published on the Company's website and the London Stock Exchange Regulatory News Service (RNS).
In the course of normal business, the company continually assesses significant risks, categorised based on impact and likelihood. The following risks, while not intended to be a comprehensive analysis, constitute (in the opinion of the board) the principal risks and uncertainties currently facing the company.
Introduction of TCFD reporting requirements. COVID-19 regulations.
Residual risk and impact on the business
regulations or there are breaches of internal
Non-compliance could result in financial penalties, criminal prosecution and reputational damage.
policies.
Continued update of knowledge on changing regulations through training, completion of qualifications and communication with third party specialists.
food contamination, equipment failure, harmful surroundings and hazardous substances (eg asbestos).
Residual risk and impact on the business Ineffective health and safety practices could result in
prosecution, closure of pubs and reputational damage. Risk mitigation
6 October 2022
J D Wetherspoon recognises the risk of climate change and is committed to incorporating the recommendations outlined by the Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosure (TCFD).
This report outlines the assessment performed by management in establishing the key climate-risks and opportunities to the business which have been identified to date, split by the four TCFD pillars; governance, risk management, strategy and metrics & targets. Management deems these disclosures to be compliant with TCFD's recommendations.
Climate change is an established risk on the Company's risk register. It is reviewed with prominence equal to that of the Company's other risks. The board of directors has overall responsibility for the risk register, which is a permanent item on the board's monthly agenda.
The Company's energy and environment group meets on a fortnightly basis. The Group is chaired by Ben Whitley (Finance Director). The group tracks the progress of goals and targets, and will monitor the Company's science-based target plan once submitted to the Science Based Target initiative (SBTi) by the end of the calendar year. Key initiatives discussed by this focus group are communicated to the business via environment champions, who are responsible for communicating energy, environment, waste & recycling best practice back to their pubs. All employees receive training on environmental matters.
As mentioned on page 82, the internal audit department is responsible for the day-to-day management of the risk register, including identifying and assessing of new and current risks. Risks are categorised according to the probability of occurrence and severity of impact. The internal audit team works alongside risk owners to determine and document mitigations to each of the Company's risks.
The Company is a member of the Zero Carbon forum – a group which supports the hospitality sector to meet its carbon reduction targets. The Company is also working with Carbon Intelligence to develop and implement a robust and credible carbon reduction strategy through the implementation of science based targets.
The Company recognises that it faces both environmental risks and opportunities relating to climate change. To date, discussions and analysis has focused on, but is not limited to, the following impacts on the business; carbon taxes, availability of electricity, changes to transport networks, changes in customers' behaviour, coastal erosion, flooding, supply chain disruption, availability and pricing of products. Management has disclosed three of these risks and one opportunity. Management assess the impact of climate charge over the short, medium and long term and estimate the financial impact.
As climate change evolves, management will continue to assess new risks and opportunities, measure against those already identified, explore potential mitigations, and in the future, consider incorporating into the strategic and financial planning of the business. The Company deems the current energy saving and consumption reduction ideas in place to be a resilient and positive start, but will continue to assess the impact and changes required. (See pages 49-50 for details).
| Risk/opportunity | Impact | Risk type | Time horizon |
Financial impact |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lack of availability of | A lack of availability of products would increase costs and | Physical/ | Medium | High risk |
| products from the supply chain. |
lower profitability. Any increased costs passed onto the customer or a reduced availability of products available to |
transitional | ||
| purchase could affect sales. | ||||
| Increased likelihood of | Pub closures would affect the profitability of the Company, | Physical | Medium | Medium risk |
| flooding from more rain | through lower sales, potential insurance premiums and the | |||
| and rising sea levels. | relocation of staff. | |||
| Negative stakeholder | Reputational damage could result in fewer customers visiting | Transitional | Short | High risk |
| perception if J D | the pubs and therefore lower sales. | |||
| Wetherspoon is seen to | The Company may struggle to attract investors, affecting its | |||
| not be doing enough to | ability to access finance. | |||
| tackle climate change. | ||||
| UK heat waves may result | If temperatures were to rise by 2° C or more, produce such as | Physical | Long | Opportunity |
| in produce typically grown | tomatoes, oranges, grapes for wine and more could be grown | |||
| in warmer climates being | in the UK. This could lower the Company's carbon footprint | |||
| grown closer to home. | while reducing produce costs due to less transportation and | |||
| import fees. |
| Risk Type | Time horizon | Financial Impact2 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Physical | Risks due to longer-term shifts in climate patterns | Long | 25 years + | High risk | >£25m | |
| such as weather disruption. | Medium | 10-25 years | Medium risk | £5-25m | ||
| Transitional | Risks in transitioning to a lower-carbon economy, for | Short | 0-10 years | Low risk | <£5m | |
| example new policies or regulations. | 2Annual impact | |||||
1Risk categories defined by the TCFD
The energy and environment group is working towards submitting a credible science based target plan to the SBTi (Science Based Target initiative) by the end of the calendar year, in the future will split by FLAG emissions. The Company is working towards the Government Net Zero Strategy by 2050 and will provide updates on progress within future reports.
The Company has reported its GHG emissions since 2014. Emission and consumption data can be found on page 68. In the future, once established, this will include scope 3. A list of the environmental initiatives already under way can be found on pages 49-50.
We have audited the financial statements of J D Wetherspoon plc (the 'company') for the 53 weeks ended 31 July 2022, which comprise the Income statement, the Statement of comprehensive income, the Cash flow statement, the Balance sheet, the Statement of changes in equity and notes to the financial statements, including a summary of significant accounting policies. The financial reporting framework that has been applied in their preparation is applicable law and UK-adopted international accounting standards.
In our opinion, the financial statements: give a true and fair view of the state of the company's affairs as at 31 July 2022 and of its profit for the 53 weeks then ended;
have been properly prepared in accordance with UKadopted international accounting standards; and have been prepared in accordance with the requirements of the Companies Act 2006.
We conducted our audit in accordance with International Standards on Auditing (UK) (ISAs (UK)) and applicable law. Our responsibilities under those standards are further described in the 'Auditor's responsibilities for the audit of the financial statements' section of our report. We are independent of the company in accordance with the ethical requirements that are relevant to our audit of the financial statements in the UK, including the FRC's Ethical Standard as applied to listed public interest entities, and we have fulfilled our other ethical responsibilities in accordance with these requirements. We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our opinion.
We are responsible for concluding on the appropriateness of the directors' use of the going concern basis of accounting and, based on the audit evidence obtained, whether a material uncertainty exists related to events or conditions that may cast significant doubt on the company's ability to continue as a going concern. If we conclude that a material uncertainty exists, we are required to draw attention in our report to the related disclosures in the financial statements or, if such disclosures are inadequate, to modify the auditor's opinion. Our conclusions are based on the audit evidence obtained up to the date of our report. However, future events or conditions may cause the company to cease to continue as a going concern.
A description of our evaluation of management's assessment of the ability to continue to adopt the going concern basis of accounting, and the key observations arising with respect to that evaluation is included in the Key Audit Matters section of our report.
Based on the work we have performed, we have not identified any material uncertainties relating to events or conditions that, individually or collectively, may cast significant doubt on the company's ability to continue as a going concern for a period of at least twelve months from when the financial statements are authorised for issue.
In auditing the financial statements, we have concluded that the directors' use of the going concern basis of accounting in the preparation of the financial statements is appropriate.
In relation to the company's reporting on how it has applied the UK Corporate Governance Code, we have nothing material to add or draw attention to in relation to the directors' statement in the financial statements about whether the directors considered it appropriate to adopt the going concern basis of accounting.
The responsibilities of the directors with respect to going concern are described in the 'Responsibilities of directors for the financial statements' section of this report.
Key audit matters are those matters that, in our professional judgement, were of most significance in our audit of the financial statements of the current period and include the most significant assessed risks of material misstatement (whether or not due to fraud) that we identified. These matters included those that had the greatest effect on: the overall audit strategy; the allocation of resources in the audit; and directing the efforts of the engagement team. These matters were addressed in the context of our audit of the financial statements as a whole, and in forming our opinion thereon, and we do not provide a separate opinion on these matters.
In the graph below, we have presented the key audit matters, significant risks and other risks relevant to the audit.
| Key Audit Matter | How our scope addressed the matter |
|---|---|
| The impairment of property, plant and equipment ("PPE") and right of use assets ("ROU assets") |
In responding to the key audit matter, we performed the following audit procedures: Considering the accounting policy for compliance with IAS 36 and that the application by the company is consistent with the stated |
| We identified impairment of PPE and ROU assets as one of the most significant assessed risks of material misstatement due to error. |
policy; Assessing the design effectiveness of controls, including the methodology applied by management to identify indicators of |
| PPE represents the largest balance on the balance sheet (31 July 2022: £1.4bn / 25 July 2021: £1.4bn). Further to this, there are ROU assets recognised which must be considered for impairment (31 July 2022: £0.4bn / 25 July 2021: £0.5bn). |
impairment and when performing their impairment test for each of the relevant pubs; Understanding and challenging management on the approach to creating the watchlist and challenging management on its completeness, including any pubs which are performing below the remainder of the estate since returning to a more "normal" trading period; |
| The directors consider each individual pub to be a separate cash generating unit. The directors are required to undertake an impairment assessment where events indicate that the carrying value of the cash generating unit may not be recoverable. |
Recalculating the arithmetical accuracy and integrity of management's impairment model, by checking the internal consistency of formulae and performing sample checks on the inputs and assumptions made in managements model to identify indicators of impairment; Validating that the methodology of the impairment exercise is |
| The process for measuring and recognising impairment under International Accounting Standard (IAS) 36 'Impairment of Assets' is complex and requires significant judgement, including assumptions within management's assessment of the impact of the geopolitical and cost of living factors on future trading activity for each pub, the determination of the appropriate discount rate to be applied to those cashflows, as well as the valuation of properties. Management identify pubs which have an indicator of impairment (management's "Watchlist" of pubs) and management then risk |
consistent with the requirements of IAS36 Impairment of Assets, including appropriate identification of CGUs and the allocation of costs in the value in use calculations; Agreeing a sample of impairment model inputs to supporting documentation, including lease agreements, historic pub profit figures and the fixed asset register; Engaging our internal valuation experts to independently calculate the discount rate and compare it to the discount rate applied in the models by management; Identifying pubs with declining profits from our revenue testing which could have indicators of impairment; Comparing management's assumptions within the impairment model against external economic forecasts reflecting the uncertainties inherent within the current economic environment; |
| rate the Watchlist of pubs into "moderate" and "high risk" based on recent trading performance. Our significant risk has been pinpointed to those pubs classified as high risk on management's "Watchlist" of pubs. |
Obtaining management's risk categorisation between 'high-risk' and 'moderate-risk' pubs and ensuring the correct classification of pubs in the impairment review and consistency between periods; Obtaining corroborative evidence to support management's judgements used for those pubs with indicators of impairment, with special audit consideration on pubs classified as "high risk" including |
| Relevant disclosures in the Annual Report and Financial Statements 2022 Financial Statements: Note 13, PPE Accounting Policies: Important estimates, Impairment of PPE Corporate Governance: Significant financial reporting items. |
evidence for changes made to the pubs, discussions with pub managers / area managers, review of pub space and plans and evidence for changes made to operations; Performing sensitivity analysis based on reasonably possible changes to key assumptions determined by management being the discount and cost inflation rates; and Assessing the disclosures in the notes to the financial statements against the requirements of IAS 36 Impairment of Assets, in particular the requirement to disclose further sensitivities for CGUs where a reasonably possible change in a key assumption would cause an impairment. |
| Key observations We identified that additional immaterial impairments were required in relation to the impairment of PPE and ROU assets. |
We identified going concern as a significant risk due to the ongoing impact of Covid-19, geopolitical and inflationary cost pressures on current and forecast trading performance, liquidity levels and covenant compliance and the challenges these factors present to management when preparing their going concern assessment.
In addition to this, as auditors, we are required to "obtain sufficient appropriate audit evidence about the appropriateness of management's use of the going concern assumption in the preparation and presentation of the financial statements and to conclude whether there is a material uncertainty about the entity's ability to continue as a going concern" (ISA (UK) 570).
Management has modelled a base case forecast in which, over the period to 28 January 2024 as it continues to emerge from the pandemic, sales, profit and cash flow growth continues. Management have anticipated within this forecast continued high levels of inflation, particularly on food products, wages and repairs.
A more cautious "downside" scenario has been analysed, where sales decline by 5% in the 52 weeks ending 30 July 2023, compared to last comparable full trading period pre the pandemic and then converges with the base case for the remainder of the going concern period to 28 January 2024. The company has reviewed, and is satisfied with, the mitigating actions it could take if such a decline were to occur. Such actions could include reducing discretionary expenditure and/or implementing price increases.
The company has two EBITDA-related covenants attached to two of their debt facilities, the RCF and USPP loan. These covenants have been waived until the end of January 2023 (Q2 FY23), with the first forecast assessment period set to be the end of April 2023 (Q3 FY23) albeit at a reduced level to normal covenant levels. Covenants will return to normal levels from the end of the October 2023 (Q1 FY24).
The company's accounting policy on going concern is shown in 'accounting policies' to the financial statements on page 43.
In responding to the key audit matter, we performed the following audit procedures:
obtained and challenged management's base case forecast for the period to 28 January 2024, together with supporting evidence for all key trading, working capital and cash flow assumptions;
obtained and challenged management's downside scenario, which reflects a reasonably possible sales decline and management's response via controllable mitigating actions;
tested the clerical accuracy of management's assessment, including forecast liquidity and covenant compliance under management's base and downside scenarios;
assessed the robustness of forecasts prepared by comparison to forecasts made in prior periods, including assessing management's historic ability to forecast, and in light of our understanding of the company's operations;
following our review of management's board memorandum, we identified the areas of business operations which could be most affected by rising costs and sought evidence to corroborate management's attempts to quantify the potential impact. We also sought evidence to support that the mitigating actions highlighted by management would be achievable and effective;
applied professional scepticism in performing our own independent reverse stress test of management's cash flow forecast models and their impact on forecast liquidity and banking covenants to identify under what circumstances the company's covenants and liquidity would be compromised, and whether the scenario has no more than a remote possibility of occurring;
obtained correspondence in relation to covenant waivers and amendments and confirmed that the terms and conditions therein were consistent with those applied by management in their base case and downside scenario forecasts, including the period over which the banks have confirmed that these waivers and amendments are in place; and
assessed the disclosures made within the financial statements for consistency with management's assessment of going concern and whether they are in line with the accounting standards.
. .
We have nothing to report in addition to that stated in the 'Conclusions relating to going concern' section of our report.
We apply the concept of materiality both in planning and performing the audit, and in evaluating the effect of identified misstatements on the audit and of uncorrected misstatements, if any, on the financial statements and in forming the opinion in the auditor's report.
Materiality was determined as follows:
| Materiality measure | Company |
|---|---|
| Materiality for financial statements as a whole |
We define materiality as the magnitude of misstatement in the financial statements that, individually or in the aggregate, could reasonably be expected to influence the economic decisions of the users of these financial statements. We use materiality in determining the nature, timing and extent of our audit work. |
| Materiality threshold | £5,000,000, which is 0.29% of revenue. |
| Significant judgements | In determining materiality, we made the following significant judgements: |
| made by auditor in determining the materiality |
We evaluated a range of benchmarks, including revenue, profit before tax and total assets. We consider revenue to be the most appropriate benchmark given the recent volatility of earnings and we selected a percentage at the lower end of our acceptable range. This represents a change from the prior year when materiality was based on a 3 year average of profit / (loss) before tax. |
| Materiality for the current period is lower than we determined for the period ended 25 July 2021. We lowered materiality as we did not consider an increase from the prior year and / or pre-Covid levels to be appropriate given profitability has not yet returned to pre Covid-19 levels. The materiality was consistent with 2019 materiality, the last normal period of trading prior to Covid-19. |
|
| Performance materiality used to drive the extent of our testing |
We set performance materiality at an amount less than materiality for the financial statements as a whole to reduce to an appropriately low level the probability that the aggregate of uncorrected and undetected misstatements exceeds materiality for the financial statements as a whole. |
| Performance materiality threshold |
£3,750,000, which is 75% of financial statement materiality. |
| Significant judgements made by auditor in |
In determining performance materiality, we made the following significant judgements; |
| determining the performance materiality |
Whether there were any significant adjustments made to the financial statements in prior years |
| Whether there were any significant control deficiencies identified in prior years | |
| Whether there were any changes in senior management during the period | |
| Whether there were any significant changes in business objectives/strategy | |
| Specific materiality | We determine specific materiality for one or more particular classes of transactions, account balances or disclosures for which misstatements of lesser amounts than materiality for the financial statements as a whole could reasonably be expected to influence the economic decisions of users taken on the basis of the financial statements. |
| Specific materiality | We determined a lower level of specific materiality for certain specific areas, being directors' remuneration and related party transactions. |
| Materiality measure | Company |
|---|---|
| Communication of misstatements to the audit committee |
We determine a threshold for reporting unadjusted differences to the audit committee. |
| Threshold for communication |
£250,000 and misstatements below that threshold that, in our view, warrant reporting on qualitative grounds. |
The graph below illustrates how performance materiality interacts with our overall materiality and the tolerance for potential uncorrected misstatements.
We performed a risk-based audit that requires an understanding of the company's business and in particular matters related to:
The engagement team obtained an understanding of the company and its environment, including the controls and the assessed risks of material misstatement. We performed interim and advanced audit procedures as well as an evaluation of the internal control environment, including the company's IT systems and controls.
We performed the majority of our work on-site and undertook substantive testing on significant transactions and material account balances, including the procedures outlined above in relation to key audit matters. There were no significant changes to the scope of the audit compared to the prior period audit.
The directors are responsible for the other information. The other information comprises the information included in the Annual Report and Financial Statements, other than the financial statements and our auditor's report thereon. Our opinion on the financial statements does not cover the other information and, except to the extent otherwise explicitly stated in our report, we do not express any form of assurance conclusion thereon.
In connection with our audit of the financial statements, our responsibility is to read the other information and, in doing so, consider whether the other information is materially inconsistent with the financial statements or our knowledge obtained in the audit or otherwise appears to be materially misstated. If we identify such material inconsistencies or apparent material misstatements, we are required to determine whether there is a material misstatement in the financial statements or a material misstatement of the other information. If, based on the work we have performed, we conclude that there is a material misstatement of this other information, we are required to report that fact.
We have nothing to report in this regard.
In our opinion, the part of the directors' remuneration report to be audited has been properly prepared in accordance with the Companies Act 2006.
In our opinion, based on the work undertaken in the course of the audit:
the information given in the strategic report and the directors' report for the financial year for which the financial statements are prepared is consistent with the financial statements and those reports have been prepared in accordance with applicable legal requirements;
the information about internal control and risk management systems in relation to financial reporting processes and about share capital structures, given in compliance with rules 7.2.5 and 7.2.6 in the Disclosure Rules and Transparency Rules sourcebook made by the Financial Conduct Authority (the FCA Rules), is consistent with the financial statements and has been prepared in accordance with applicable legal requirements; and
information about the company's corporate governance code and practices and about its administrative, management and supervisory bodies and their committees complies with rules 7.2.2, 7.2.3 and 7.2.7 of the FCA Rules.
In the light of the knowledge and understanding of the company and its environment obtained in the course of the audit, we have not identified material misstatements in:
the strategic report or the directors' report; or
the information about internal control and risk management systems in relation to financial reporting processes and about share capital structures, given in compliance with rules 7.2.5 and 7.2.6 of the FCA Rules.
We have nothing to report in respect of the following matters in relation to which the Companies Act 2006 requires us to report to you if, in our opinion:
adequate accounting records have not been kept, or returns adequate for our audit have not been received from branches not visited by us; or
the financial statements and the part of the directors' remuneration report to be audited are not in agreement with the accounting records and returns; or
a corporate governance statement has not been prepared by the company.
The Listing Rules require us to review the directors' statement in relation to going concern, longer-term viability and that part of the Corporate Governance Statement relating to the company's compliance with the provisions of the UK Corporate Governance Code specified for our review.
Based on the work undertaken as part of our audit, we have concluded that each of the following elements of the Corporate Governance Statement is materially consistent with the financial statements, or our knowledge obtained during the audit:
the directors' statement in the financial statements about whether the directors considered it appropriate to adopt the going concern basis of accounting in preparing the financial statements and the directors' identification of any material uncertainties to the company's ability to continue to do so over a period of at least twelve months from the date of approval of the financial statements.
the directors' explanation in the Annual Report and Financial Statements as to how they have assessed the prospects of the company, over what period they have done so and why they consider that period to be appropriate, and their statement as to whether they have a reasonable expectation that the company will be able to continue in operation and meet its liabilities as they fall due over the period of their assessment, including any related disclosures drawing attention to any necessary qualifications or assumptions;
the directors' statement that they consider the annual report and financial statements taken as a whole is fair, balanced and understandable and provides the information necessary for shareholders to assess the company's performance, business model and strategy;
the directors' confirmation in the annual report that they have carried out a robust assessment of the principal and emerging risks facing the company including the impact of Covid-19 and the disclosures in the annual report that describe the principal risks, procedures to identify emerging risks and an explanation of how they are being managed or mitigated including the impact of Covid-19;
the section of the annual report that describes the review of the effectiveness of the company's risk management and internal control systems, covering all material controls, including financial, operational and compliance controls; and
the section of the annual report describing the work of the audit committee, including significant issues that the audit committee considered relating to the financial statements and how these issues were addressed.
As explained more fully in the directors' responsibilities statement, the directors are responsible for the preparation of the financial statements and for being satisfied that they give a true and fair view, and for such internal control as the directors determine is
necessary to enable the preparation of financial statements that are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error.
In preparing the financial statements, the directors are responsible for assessing the company's ability to continue as a going concern, disclosing, as applicable, matters related to going concern and using the going concern basis of accounting unless the directors either intend to liquidate the company or to cease operations, or have no realistic alternative but to do so.
Our objectives are to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements as a whole are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error, and to issue an auditor's report that includes our opinion. Reasonable assurance is a high level of assurance but is not a guarantee that an audit conducted in accordance with ISAs (UK) will always detect a material misstatement when it exists.
Misstatements can arise from fraud or error and are considered material if, individually or in the aggregate, they could reasonably be expected to influence the economic decisions of users taken on the basis of these financial statements.
A further description of our responsibilities for the audit of the financial statements is located on the Financial Reporting Council's website at: www.frc.org.uk/auditorsresponsibilities. The description forms part of the auditor's report.
Irregularities, including fraud, are instances of non-compliance with laws and regulations. We design procedures in line with our responsibilities, outlined above, to detect material misstatements in respect of irregularities, including fraud. Owing to the inherent limitations of an audit, there is an unavoidable risk that material misstatements in the financial statements may not be detected, even though the audit is properly planned and performed in accordance with ISAs (UK).
The extent to which our procedures are capable of detecting irregularities, including fraud, is detailed below:
We obtained an understanding of legal and regulatory frameworks applicable to the company and the industry in which it operates through review of prior year financial statements, enquiries of management, the finance team, Head of Legal and the Audit Committee. We determined that the following laws and regulations were most significant: UKadopted international accounting standards, IFRIC Interpretations, Companies Act 2006, Listing Rules and the UK Corporate Governance Code;
We enquired of management and the board of directors whether they were aware of any instances of noncompliance with laws and regulations and whether they had any knowledge of actual, suspected alleged fraud; We enquired of management, the finance team, Head of Legal and the Audit Committee about the company's policies and procedures relating to the identification, evaluation and compliance with laws and regulations and the detection and response to the risks of fraud and the establishment of internal controls to mitigate risks related to fraud or noncompliance with laws and regulations;
We obtained an understanding of how the company is complying with those legal and regulatory frameworks by making enquiries of management, those responsible for legal and compliance procedures and the company secretary. Our findings were corroborated by review of the board minutes and papers provided to the audit committee and a review of HMRC correspondence;
We assessed the susceptibility of the company's financial statements to material misstatement, including how fraud might occur. Audit procedures performed by the engagement team included:
-
These audit procedures were designed to provide reasonable assurance that the financial statements were free from fraud or error. The risk of not detecting a material misstatement due to fraud is higher than the risk of not detecting one resulting from error and detecting irregularities that result from fraud is inherently more difficult than detecting those that result from error, as fraud may involve collusion, deliberate concealment, forgery or intentional misrepresentations. Also, the further removed non-compliance with laws and regulations is from events and transactions reflected in the financial statements, the less likely we would become aware of it;
The engagement partner assessed the appropriateness of the collective competence and capabilities of the engagement team, by considering the engagement team's understanding of, and practical experience with, audit engagements of a similar nature and complexity;
We communicated relevant laws and regulations and potential fraud risks to all engagement team members and remained alert to any indications of fraud or non-compliance with laws and regulations throughout the audit.
Following the recommendation of the audit committee, we were appointed by the board on 9 November 2017 to audit the financial statements for the period ended 29 July 2018 and subsequent financial periods.
The period of total uninterrupted engagement including previous renewals and reappointments of the firm is 5 years, covering the periods ended 29 July 2018 to 31 July 2022.
The non-audit services prohibited by the FRC's Ethical Standard were not provided to the company and we remain independent of the company in conducting our audit.
Our audit opinion is consistent with the additional report to the audit committee.
This report is made solely to the company's members, as a body, in accordance with Chapter 3 of Part 16 of the Companies Act 2006. Our audit work has been undertaken so that we might state to the company's members those matters we are required to state to them in an auditor's report and for no other purpose. To the fullest extent permitted by law, we do not accept or assume responsibility to anyone other than the company and the company's members as a body, for our audit work, for this report, or for the opinions we have formed.
Marc Summers BSc (Hons) FCA Senior Statutory Auditor for and on behalf of Grant Thornton UK LLP Statutory Auditor, Chartered Accountants London 6 October 2022
| A founder-led company with a combined executive board experience of 86 years. | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tim Martin, Chairman, aged 67 Founded the Company in 1979, having previously studied law at Nottingham University and qualified as a barrister. He became chairman in 1983. Ⓑ |
John Hutson, Chief Executive Officer, aged 57 Joined in 1991 and was appointed to the board in 1996. He is a graduate of Exeter University. Ⓑ Ⓜ |
||||
| EXECUTIVE BOARD DIRECTORS |
Su Cacioppo, Personnel and Legal Director, aged 55 Joined in 1991 and was appointed to the board in 2008. She is a graduate of South Bank University and London Guildhall University. Ⓑ Ⓜ James Ullman, Personnel and Retail Auditor Director, aged 51 Joined in 1994 and was appointed to the board in 2022. He is a graduate of Brighton University and Birmingham City University. He became a chartered internal auditor in 2011. Ⓑ Ⓜ |
Ben Whitley, Finance Director, aged 44 Joined in 1999 and was appointed to the board in 2015. He is a graduate of Durham University and qualified as a chartered management accountant in 2012. Ⓑ Ⓜ |
|||
| DIRECTORS EMPLOYEE PEOPLE |
Hudson Simmons, Employee Director, aged 50 Joined in 1997 and was appointed to the board in 2021 and is area manager for the Sheffield area. He is a graduate of Nottingham Trent University. Ⓑ |
Debbie Whittingham, Employee Director, aged 53 Joined in 1992 and was appointed to the board in 2021. She is regional manager for the West Midlands. Ⓑ |
|||
| Ben Thorne, Senior Independent Director, aged 63 Appointed to the board in 2020. He is a graduate of Westminster University. He qualified as a solicitor in 1985. He is managing director at WH Ireland. Ⓑ Ⓐ Ⓝ Ⓡ |
Debra van Gene, Non-Executive Director, aged 68 Appointed to the board in 2006 and is chair of the remuneration committee. She is a graduate of Oxford University. She has previously been a partner at Heidrick and Struggles Inc and a commissioner with the Judicial Appointments Commission. Ⓑ Ⓐ Ⓝ Ⓡ |
||||
| NON-EXECUTIVE DIRECTORS |
Harry Morley Non-Executive Director, aged 57 Appointed to the board in 2016 and is chair of the audit committee. He is a graduate of Oxford University. He is a non-executive director of The Mercantile Investment Trust plc, TheWorks.co.uk plc and of Cadogan Group. He is a trustee of the Ascot Authority. He qualified as a chartered accountant in 1991. Ⓑ Ⓐ Ⓝ Ⓡ |
Sir Richard Beckett, Non-Executive Director, aged 78 Appointed to the board in 2009 and is chair of the nomination committee. He was called to the bar in 1965 and took silk in 1987. He was one of the pre-eminent practitioners in regulatory and licensing matters. Ⓑ Ⓐ Ⓝ Ⓡ |
|||
| Nigel Connor, Company Secretary and Legal Director, aged 53 Joined in 2009 and was appointed company secretary in 2014. He is a graduate of Newcastle University and qualified as a solicitor in 1997. |
David Capstick, IT and Property Director, aged 61 Joined in 1998 and appointed to the management board in 2003. He is a graduate of the University of Surrey. Ⓜ |
||||
| Ⓑ Ⓜ Michael Barron, Commercial Director, aged 36 Joined in 2011 and appointed to the management board in 2022. He is a graduate of Sheffield University and qualified as a |
Martin Geoghegan, Operations Director, aged 53 Joined in 1994 and appointed as operations director in 2004. Ⓜ |
||||
| MANAGEMENT BOARD |
chartered accountant in 2010. Ⓜ Paul Brimmer, Purchasing Director, aged 47 Joined in 2006 and appointed to the management board in 2022. He became a member of the Chartered Institute of Procurement |
Tom Ball, People Director, aged 46 Joined in 2009 and appointed to the management board in 2022. He is a graduate of Bournemouth University. Ⓜ Hannah Young, Deputy Finance Director, aged 41. Joined in 2013 and appointed to the management board in 2022. |
|||
| and Supply in 2002. Ⓜ |
She is a graduate of Bristol University and qualified as a chartered management accountant in 2006. Ⓜ |
||||
| DIRECTORS ASSOCIATE |
Will Fotheringham, Associate Employee Director, aged 48 Emma Gibson, Associate Employee Director, aged 36 Joined in 1998. Appointed as an associate employee director in Joined in 2004. Appointed as an associate employee director in 2021. He is general manager for the north west England and north 2021. She is pub manager of The Imperial, Exeter. Wales. |
||||
| Key Board Management Audit Ⓑ Ⓜ Ⓐ member board committee |
Nomination Remuneration Ⓝ Ⓡ committee committee |
The directors of the Company who were in office during the year and up to the date of signing the financial statements are listed on page 65.
No dividend will be paid for the year.
At the annual general meeting of the Company, held on 18 November 2021, the Company was given authority to make market purchases of up to 19,312,523 of its own shares. During the year to 31 July 2022, we purchased 1,396,204 shares for share-based payments.
No director has any material interest in any contractual agreement, other than an employment contract, subsisting during or at the end of the year, which is, or may be, significant to the Company.
The Company has an authorised share capital comprising 500,000,000 ordinary shares of 2p each. As at 31 July 2022, the total issued share capital comprised 128,750,155 fully paid-up shares of 2p each. The rights to these shares are set out in the Company's articles of association. There are no restrictions on the transfer of these shares or their attached voting rights.
Details of significant shareholdings at year end and as at 31 July 2022 are given on page 85.
No person holds shares with specific rights regarding control of the Company.
The Company operates an employee share incentive plan. However, no specific rights with respect to the control of the Company are attached to these shares. In addition, the Company operates a deferred bonus scheme, whereby, should a takeover occur, all shares held in trust would be transferred to the employee immediately.
The Company is not aware of any agreements among holders of securities known to the Company which may result in restrictions on the transfer of securities or voting rights.
The Company has the power to issue and buy back shares as a result of resolutions passed at the annual general meeting in 2021. It is the Company's intention to renew these powers; the resolutions approving them are found in the notice of the annual general meeting for 2022.
In the event of a change of control, the Company is obliged to notify its main bank lenders. The lenders shall not be obliged to fund any new borrowing requests; facilities will lapse 10 days after the change of control, if the terms on which they can continue have not been agreed on.
Any borrowings, including accrued interest, will become immediately repayable on such lapse.
There are no other significant agreements to which the Company is party which may be subject to changeof-control provisions.
There are no agreements with the Company's directors or employees which provide for compensation for loss of office or employment which occurs because of a takeover bid.
The directors are responsible for preparing the annual report, the directors' remuneration report and the financial statements, in accordance with applicable law and regulations.
Company law requires the directors to prepare financial statements for each financial year. Under that law, the directors have prepared the financial statements in accordance with the UK-adopted international accounting standards and have been prepared in accordance with the requirements of the Companies Act 2006. Under company law, the directors must not approve the financial statements, unless they are satisfied that they give a true, fair and balanced view of the state of affairs of the Company and of the profit or loss of the Company for that period. In preparing these financial statements, the directors are required to:
select suitable accounting policies and then apply them consistently
make judgements and accounting estimates which are reasonable and prudent state whether applicable UK-adopted international accounting standards (IASs) in accordance with the requirements of the Companies Act 2006 have been followed, subject to any material departures disclosed and explained in the financial statements prepare the financial statements on the goingconcern basis, unless it is inappropriate to presume that the Company will continue in business
The directors are responsible for keeping adequate accounting records which are sufficient to show and explain the Company's transactions and disclose with reasonable accuracy at any time the financial position of the Company and to enable them to ensure that the financial statements and the directors' remuneration report comply with the Companies Act 2006 and article 4 of the IAS regulation. They are also responsible for safeguarding the assets of the Company and hence for taking reasonable steps for the prevention and detection of fraud and other irregularities.
The directors confirm that:
so far as each director is aware, there is no relevant audit information of which the Company's auditor is unaware
the directors have taken all the steps which they ought to have taken as directors to make themselves aware of any relevant audit information and to establish that the Company's auditor is aware of that information.
The directors are responsible for preparing the annual report in accordance with applicable law and regulations. The directors consider that the annual report and financial statements, taken as a whole, provide the information necessary to assess the Company's performance, business model and strategy and are fair, balanced and understandable.
The directors are responsible for the maintenance and integrity of the corporate and financial information included on the Company's website. Legislation in the United Kingdom governing the preparation and dissemination of financial statements may differ from legislation in other jurisdictions.
To the best of our knowledge:
the Company's financial statements are prepared in accordance with the UK-adopted international accounting standards and have been prepared in accordance with the requirements of the Companies Act 2006; and
the strategic report and directors' report include a fair review of the development and performance of the business and the position of the Company, together with a description of the principal risks and uncertainties which it faces.
Information on the Company's relations with customers and suppliers is disclosed in the strategic report on page 51.
Information on the Company's employment policies is disclosed in the corporate governance report on pages 83-84.
As permitted by the articles of association, the directors have the benefit of an indemnity which is a qualifying third-party indemnity provision, as defined by section 234 of the Companies Act 2006. The indemnity was in force throughout the last financial year and is currently in force. Throughout the financial year, the Company also purchased and maintained, directors and officers' liability insurance, in respect of itself and its directors.
In accordance with provision 31 of the UK Corporate Governance Code 2018, the directors confirm that they have a reasonable expectation that the Company will continue to operate and meet its liabilities, as they fall due, until the financial year in 2025.
The directors have determined that a three-year period is an appropriate period over which to assess viability, as it aligns with the Company's capital investment plans and gives a greater certainty over the forecasting assumptions used.
The directors' assessment has been made with reference to the Company's current position, financial plan and its principal risks and uncertainties set out on pages 52–53, specifically economic, regulatory, reputational and interest-rate risks. To assess the impact of the Company's principal risks and uncertainties on its long-term viability, scenarios were applied to the Company's financial forecasts in the form of reduced like-for-like sales compared to FY19 . It is assumed that the Company's financial plans would be adjusted in response, such actions could include reducing discretionary expenditure and/or implementing price increases.
The Company has Revolving Credit Facilities in place of £875m until February 2024 and £855m until February 2025. The company has re-financing options available including possible extensions on the Revolving Credit Facility.
In making this statement, the directors carried out a robust assessment of the principal risks and uncertainties facing the Company, including those which would threaten its business model, future performance, solvency or liquidity. Principal risks and uncertainties set out on pages 52–53 are the result of internal risk management and control processes, with further details set out in the audit committee's report on pages 81-84.
The directors have made enquiries into the adequacy of the Company's financial resources, through a review of the Company's budget and medium-term financial plan, including capital expenditure plans and cash flow forecasts.
The Company has modelled a base forecast in which, over the period to 28 January 2024 as it continues to emerge from the pandemic, sales, profit and cash flow growth continues. The Company has anticipated within this forecast continued high levels of inflation, particularly on food products, wages and repairs.
A more cautious scenario has been analysed, in which sales decline by 5% in the next 12 months, compared with FY19. The Company has reviewed, and is satisfied with, the mitigating actions which it could take if such a decline were to occur. Such actions could include reducing discretionary expenditure and/or implementing price increases.
The directors are satisfied that the Company has sufficient resources (eg profitability/liquidity) to withstand adjustments to the base forecast, as well as the downside scenario.
The Company has agreed with its lenders to replace normal financial covenant tests with a minimum liquidity covenant for the period up to and including January 2023, and relaxed leverage covenant tests for the second half of the financial year to 30 July 2023. The Company is confident that it will be in a position to return to normal financial covenant tests thereafter. The Company has re-financing options available including possible extensions on the revolving credit facility.
As a result, the directors have satisfied themselves that the Company will continue in operational existence for the foreseeable future. For this reason, the Company continues to adopt the going-concern basis in preparing its financial statements.
The Company's policy on the use of financial instruments is set out in note 22.
| GHG emissions | Unit | Quantity | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | 2021 | |||
| Scope 1 | Tonnes CO2e | 41,324 | 24,726 | |
| Scope 2 | Tonnes CO2e | 65,971 | 57,079 | |
| Fuel (car) | Tonnes CO2e | 454 | 33 | |
| Tonnes CO2e / | ||||
| Intensity | £m revenue | 61.9 | 105.9 |
| 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|
| Scope 1 | 226,818,295 | 134,994,694 |
| Scope 2 | 205,305,472 | 178,260,013 |
| Fuel (car) | 1,917,037 | 139,138 |
| Total | 434,040,804 | 313,393,845 |
The data in the above tables is calculated by taking consumption data and converting it using conversion factors published by the Department for Business, Energy & Industrial Strategy.
All emissions have been produced within the UK.
This data doesn't include amounts from the Republic
of Ireland, owing to us not holding this information.
Reported data is for the year ended 31 July 2022
Scope 1 – combustion of gas
Scope 2 – purchase of electricity
Refrigerant emissions from our pubs are
not reported, as they are immaterial
The amounts for 2022 are for the 53 week period ending 31 July 2022, while the amounts for 2021 are for the 52 week period ending 25 July 2021.
The Company has an overseas branch in the Republic of Ireland.
Information required by this rule to be disclosed (starting on page indicated, if applicable):
Details of long-term incentive schemes, page 70–71
Provision of services by a controlling shareholder page 69–77,
Agreements with controlling shareholders, page 42 Corporate governance (DTR 7.2.9 R), pages 78–84.
The Company intends to continue to operate pubs and hotels throughout the UK and Ireland. The Company aims to continue to provide customers with good-quality food and drinks, served by well-trained and friendly staff, at reasonable prices.
There are no events to disclose.
By order of the board
Company Secretary 6 October 2022
Annual statement
Dear shareholder
The following salary increases and awards were made to executive board members this year, in accordance with the remuneration policy agreed by shareholders at the Company's AGM in December 2020:
The salaries of the CEO, the Finance Director and the Personnel and Legal Director were unchanged. This compares with a 7.89% increase for the general salaried workforce.
The Personnel and Legal Director is retiring on 7 October 2022. The Company has promoted the Retail Audit Director to Personnel and Retail Audit Director. His salary was increased by 20% on promotion.
There will be no annual cash bonus awarded to executive directors this year.
The deferred bonus scheme is a scheme which may award shares to all senior managers throughout the business including executive directors.
Given the extraordinary circumstances of the past year, the scheme was not due to deliver any award of shares.
In recognition of the enormous effort and hard work since March 2020, and in order to continue to motivate all senior managers throughout the business in their continued focus to rebuild the business, the Remuneration Committee agreed to award a discretionary bonus based on 10% increase in owners' earnings. At executive board level this will result in an award of 25% of basic salaries in shares.
The Company SIP is open to all employees in the Company, at varying levels, according to each individual's seniority and length of service.
Executive Directors received an amount equivalent to 25% of their salary in shares. The CEO and Personnel and Legal Director received an additional award equivalent to 10% of their salary, because of their length of service. This additional 10% is available to all employees with over 30 years' service with the Company.
A new all employee pension scheme has been introduced, in line with current guidance and applies to all new employees from 1 August 2022.
The Remuneration Committee agreed that no reductions would be made to pension contribution levels for existing directors and employees. This is on the basis that the current pension contribution percentage is part of existing directors' and employees' contractual arrangements and complies with the Company remuneration policy agreed by shareholders at the December 2020 AGM.
Accordingly, the Company paid 12% pension contributions or a cash equivalent to executive directors this year.
The CEO and the Personnel and Legal Director received an additional 4% of their salary, because of their length of service. This additional 4% is available to all employees with over 30 years' service with the Company.
Wider workforce policies and issues, including (but not exclusively) remuneration, are a standing item on board agendas.
In the current year two employee directors and two associate employee directors were appointed. This was in order that debate and decision making at board level shared the benefit of the "front line" experience that the company 's other regular meetings benefit from. This sharing of experience is vital to preserving the culture of the company in the future
In setting remuneration for the executive board, the committee takes into account wider workforce remuneration policies throughout the Company. Many of the elements of executive board remuneration outlined above extend throughout much of the Company, at varying levels
Chair of the Remuneration Committee 6 October 2022
The committee reviews the executive directors' remuneration packages at least annually. The aim of the remuneration policy is to:
In agreeing on remuneration, account is taken of the pay levels at Wetherspoon, as well as those in the hospitality industry in general, along with other comparisons and reports. The committee aims to take a fair and commonsense approach.
This statement of our remuneration policy was approved by shareholders at the Company's AGM on 17 December 2020. The policy is put forward to shareholders' for approval every three years.
| Component Reason Operation, maximum achievable and performance criteria |
|||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Base salary | Provide attractive and fair remuneration |
Salaries are reviewed at least annually, with any changes normally taking effect from 1 October each year. |
|||||
| for directors. | Salary increases are awarded at the discretion of the remuneration committee. |
||||||
| When considering salary levels and whether an increase should be offered, the committee takes account of a variety of factors, including Company performance, individual performance, experience and responsibilities, market information and the level of increase being offered to other employees. |
|||||||
| Benefits | Provide attractive and fair remuneration for directors. |
A range of taxable benefits is available to executive directors. These benefits comprise principally the provision of a car allowance, life assurance, private medical insurance and fuel expenses. |
|||||
| In addition, an allowance equivalent to 5% of salary is paid for a set number of calls to monitor service and standards in pubs, predominantly in the evening and at weekends. This is paid quarterly. |
|||||||
| The cost of benefits provided changes in accordance with market conditions. The committee monitors the overall cost of the package periodically. |
|||||||
| Pension | Provide attractive and fair |
The Company does not operate any defined benefit pension schemes. | |||||
| remuneration for directors. |
Newly appointed executive directors will receive a pension contribution of 6% which is aligned with that made on average to the wider workforce at the date of this policy. For the basis of this, please see the table on page 74. |
||||||
| Existing executive directors will continue to receive 12% of base salary, on the basis that this has never been excessive, is lower than the average for FTSE250 firms and is not disproportionate with that of the wider workforce. |
|||||||
| After 25 years' service, all employees in the Company, including executive directors receive additional pension payments of 2% of their salary. This rises by a further 2% after each additional five years' service. |
|||||||
| Executive directors may receive a salary supplement in lieu of pension, at the discretion of the remuneration committee. |
|||||||
| Annual bonus plan |
Incentivise directors |
Annual bonus payments are paid in cash, at the discretion of the remuneration committee. |
|||||
| to perform to a high level. |
The bonus is based on profit growth, multiplied by a factor of 1.5 and paid to a maximum of 45% of salary. Profit growth is calculated on profit before tax, property gains/losses and exceptional items. |
| Component | Reason | Operation, maximum achievable and performance criteria | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Share incentive plan (SIP) |
Align directors' interests with those of shareholders, |
The SIP allocates shares equivalent to 5% of salary to all Company employees after an 18-month qualifying period. Shares do not vest for at least three years under this plan – and tax-free returns are possible, if the shares are held for five years or more. |
|||||
| employees and the wider community. |
The Company offers extra shares under this scheme to some employees: pub managers receive an extra 5% annual award; head-office staff 10–15%; directors, including executive board directors, 20%. |
||||||
| After 25 years' service, executive directors receive additional SIPs of 5% of their salary. This rises by a further 5% after each additional five years' service. The increases which apply to directors after 25 years and after each additional five years also apply to all other employees. |
|||||||
| Awards under this scheme are not based on financial or other targets. The Company believes that excessive use of financial targets can lead to distortions in companies' behaviour and that it is important for there to be some share awards which can be accumulated gradually, the value of which depends on the overall success of the Company. The aim is for all employees to be able to accumulate shares over time, to encourage loyalty and joint purpose. |
|||||||
| Awards are made twice yearly throughout the Company. | |||||||
| Directors must be in office when the shares vest. | |||||||
| If changes are made to SIPs which apply to all employees in the schemes, they may be applied to executive directors, at the discretion of the remuneration committee. |
|||||||
| Deferred bonus scheme |
Align directors' interests with those of |
The Company does not operate a shareholding scheme with a minimum vesting period of five years. |
|||||
| shareholders, employees and the wider community. |
The deferred bonus scheme may award shares to all senior managers, including executive directors. Bonus awards are made under the scheme, annually, at the discretion of the remuneration committee. |
||||||
| Bonus awards are satisfied in shares. One-third of a participant's shares will vest to the participant on calculation of the amount of the award, one-third |
|||||||
| will vest after one year and the remaining third will vest to the participant after two years (in each case subject to the participant being employed at the release date). |
|||||||
| The current performance criteria are based on earnings per share and owners' earnings per share. The performance criteria for executive directors are the same as those for senior managers who are eligible for the scheme. Awards are made using a multiple based on an employee's grade. The maximum bonus to be earned under the scheme is 100% of annual salary. |
|||||||
| Any changes made to the deferred bonus scheme for eligible senior managers may, at the discretion of the remuneration committee, be applied to executive directors. |
|||||||
| Non executive directors' |
Provide attractive and fair |
The fees paid to non-executive directors are determined by the executive board, taking into account the level of fees for similar positions in the market and the time commitment which each non-executive director makes. |
|||||
| fees | remuneration for directors. |
The non-executive directors receive no other remuneration or benefits from the Company. |
Executive directors are required to maintain a minimum shareholding. Minimum holding requirements are set by the remuneration committee for each director and reviewed every three years, when the remuneration policy is reviewed. Minimum holding requirements include awarded shares which have not yet vested.
To the extent that any executive director holds under the required number of shares, he or she has a fiveyear period to meet this requirement from the date on which the requirement was set (17 December 2020). During this period, at least 50% of any vested share awards must be retained, until the required shareholding is attained.
On ceasing to be an executive director, a minimum holding of 50% of the previous requirement must be maintained for a minimum period of 12 months.
This guideline applies to shares which vest following the adoption of this guideline. Any shares purchased by executives would not be subject to the guideline.
The application of the minimum shareholding requirement is at the discretion of the remuneration committee.
The current minimum shareholding requirements are 200% of base salary, calculated on a £15.71 share price at 29 July 2019, this was the share price at the start of the previous financial year:
| Number of shares | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Minimum Requirement |
Shares held as 31 July 2022 |
||||||
| B Whitley | 28,000 | 25,957 | |||||
| J Hutson | 76,000 | 196,618 | |||||
| S Cacioppo | 44,000 | 58,158 | |||||
| T Martin | 41,000 | 28,174,709 |
Members of the wider management team may receive each of the components of remuneration awarded to the executive directors, although the amounts due for each component may vary, depending on their level of seniority.
Non-executive directors are not entitled to any component, other than fees.
The wider employee population of the Company will receive remuneration which is considered appropriate to their level of responsibility and performance.
Withholding and recovery of awards Awards made under the bonus scheme and the deferred bonus scheme may be reclaimed, in exceptional circumstances of misstatement or misconduct.
In the event of serious misstatement or misconduct, the remuneration committee can stop bonuses from being paid and prevent share awards from vesting. The remuneration committee will make reasonable judgement, based on the facts at hand. Any actions taken will be at the discretion of the remuneration committee.
The aim, when agreeing on components of a remuneration package, including any variable pay for incoming directors, would be in accordance with the table above.
Account is taken of the individual's experience, the nature of the role being offered and his or her existing remuneration package. Relocation expenses or allowances may be paid, as appropriate.
The committee may, at its discretion, offer cash, sharebased elements or additional pension contributions, as necessary, to secure an appointment, although it does not normally do so. Shareholders will be informed of any such payments at the time of appointment.
Our main principle is that payments made to prospective directors as compensation for loss of benefits at a previous Company are inherently unfair, since it would be extremely rare for anyone below board level to receive this sort of compensation.
The executive directors are employed on rolling contracts, requiring the Company to give up to one year's notice of termination, while the director may give six months' notice.
In the event of termination of employment with the Company, without the requisite period of notice, executive directors' service contracts provide for the payment of a sum equivalent to the net value of salary and benefits to which the executive would have been entitled during the notice period.
The executive is required to mitigate his or her loss and such mitigation may be taken into account in any payment made. The Company's policies on the duration of directors' service contracts, notice periods and termination payments are all in accordance with best industry practice.
The commencement dates for executive directors' service contracts were as follows:
Tim Martin – 20 October 1992 John Hutson – 2 February 1998 Su Cacioppo – 10 March 2008 Ben Whitley – 5 November 2015 James Ullman – 22 September 2022
All executive directors apart from Su Cacioppo, will be standing for re-election at the AGM. Their current service contracts do not have an explicit expiry date.
The non-executive directors hold their positions, pursuant to letters of appointment dated 12 November 2021, with a term of 12 months.
If their appointment is terminated early, non-executive directors are entitled to the fees to which they would have been entitled up to the end of their term. They do not participate in the Company's bonus or share schemes. Their fees are determined by the executive directors, following consultation with professional advisers, as appropriate.
The employee directors hold their positions, pursuant to letters of appointment dated 9 December 2021, with a term of three years.
Executive directors are not allowed to take external appointments without the prior consent of the Company. The Company has not released any executive directors to serve as non-executive director elsewhere.
The charts below set out the composition of the chairman and executive directors' remuneration packages in £000, at a minimum, a reasonable expectation target and as a possible maximum:
| Maximum | 42% | 15% | £1,912 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Expected | 64% | 4% 32% |
£1,259 | |||
| Minimum | 77% | 19% £986 |
Company scheme. | |||
| Maximum | 40% | 15% | £734 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Expected | 63% | 5% 32% |
£479 | ||
| Minimum | 76% | 21% £371 |
|||
| Maximum | 40% | 17% | £1,081 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Expected | 63% | 5% 32% |
£714 | ||
| Minimum | 78% | 19% £561 |
|||
| Fixed | Annual variable | Long-term incentive | directors' remuneration policy. |
The fixed annual values include:
Fixed annual salary, benefits and allowances, in line with those outlined in the policy section, and based on the salaries applicable as at 31 July 2022
The annual variable values include the cash bonus which may be achievable. In the case of 'expected', an average percentage achieved over the last five years has been used as a basis.
The long-term incentive plan values include: The fixed 25% awarded under the Company's share incentive plan An average achieved in respect of the deferred bonus scheme over the last five years
The Company's policy is that the period of notice for executive directors will not exceed 12 months; accordingly, the employment contracts of the executive directors are terminable on 12 months' notice by the Company or six months' notice by a director. In the event of gross misconduct, the Company may terminate a director's employment without notice or compensation.
In the event of a director's departure, the Company's policy on termination payments is as follows:
The Company will seek to ensure that no more
is paid than is warranted in each individual case
Salary payments will be limited to notice periods There is no entitlement to bonus paid
(or associated deferred shares or SIPs) following notice of termination
The committee's normal policy is that, where the individual is considered a 'good leaver', a prorated bonus may be paid
The Company may enable the provision of outplacement services to a departing director 100% £338
The Company does not have a mandatory retirement age. Employees wishing to retire should be aged at least 55 years at the date of leaving (the minimum age a person can access a workplace pension) and serve their contractual notice period. Retiring employees are permitted to retain any unvested shares held in any Company scheme. £0 £100 £200 £300 4% 15% 19% 32% 43% £1,912 £0 £400 £800 £1,200 £1,600 £2,000 £0 £200 £400 £600 £800 £0 £300 £600 £900 £1,200
The committee receives information on salary increases, bonus payments and other benefits available at the Company. These are taken into consideration when conducting the review of executive remuneration, although no formal consultation with employees is undertaken in this regard. 5% 15% 21% 32% 45% £479 £734
Any views in respect of directors' remuneration expressed to the Company by shareholders have been, and will be, taken into account in the formulation of the directors' remuneration policy. 5% 19% 32% £714
Details of votes cast for and against the resolution to approve last year's remuneration report and any matters discussed with shareholders during the year are provided in the annual report on remuneration.
The table below sets out in a single figure the total amount of remuneration, including each element, received by each director for the year ended 31 July 2022.
| Full basic salary (pre deductions) |
Voluntary COVID 19 reductions |
Taxable benefits/allowance1 |
Performance bonus2 |
Long-term incentives4 |
Pension contributions3 |
Total | Total fixed | Total variable | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 £000 |
2021 £000 |
2022 £000 |
2021 £000 |
2022 £000 |
2021 £000 |
2022 £000 |
2021 £000 |
2022 £000 |
2021 £000 |
2022 £000 |
2021 £000 |
2022 £000 |
2021 £000 |
2022 £000 |
2021 £000 |
2022 £000 |
2021 £000 |
|
| Executive directors |
||||||||||||||||||
| John Hutson | 638 | 638 | – | (51) | 54 | 33 | – | – | 223 | 96 | 102 | 97 | 1,017 | 813 | 794 | 717 | 223 | 96 |
| Su Cacioppo | 358 | 358 | – | (6) | 38 | 24 | – | – | 125 | 54 | 57 | 51 | 578 | 481 | 453 | 427 | 125 | 54 |
| Ben Whitley | 250 | 250 | – | (4) | 29 | 20 | – | – | 62 | 31 | 30 | 30 | 371 | 327 | 309 | 296 | 62 | 31 |
| James Ullman | 45 | – | – | – | 9 | – | – | – | – | – | 6 | – | 60 | – | 60 | – | – | – |
| 1,291 | 1,246 | – | (61) | 130 | 77 | – | – | 410 | 181 | 195 | 178 | 2,026 | 1,621 | 1,616 | 1,440 | 410 | 181 | |
| Chairman, non executive directors and employee directors |
||||||||||||||||||
| Tim Martin | 324 | 324 | – | (51) | 13 | 14 | – | – | – | – | – | – | 337 | 287 | 337 | 287 | – | – |
| Ben Thorne | 54 | 32 | – | (7) | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | 54 | 25 | 54 | 25 | – | – |
| Debra van Gene | 54 | 54 | – | (9) | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | 54 | 45 | 54 | 45 | – | – |
| Richard Beckett | 54 | 54 | – | (9) | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | 54 | 45 | 54 | 45 | – | – |
| Harry Morley | 54 | 54 | – | (9) | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | 54 | 45 | 54 | 45 | – | – |
| Hudson Simmons | 5 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | 5 | – | 5 | – | – | – |
| Deborah Whittingham |
5 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | 5 | – | 5 | – | – | – |
| 550 | 518 | – | (85) | 13 | 14 | – | – | – | – | – | – | 563 | 447 | 553 | 447 | – | – | |
| Total | 1,841 | 1,764 | – | (146) | 143 | 91 | – | – | 410 | 181 | 195 | 178 | 2,589 | 2,068 | 2,179 | 1,887 | 410 | 181 |
1) Taxable benefits include car allowances and the provision of rail travel for Tim Martin, as well as private health and fuel expenses for executive directors. In respect of the element for pub calls made to monitor standards, 5% was awarded, in line with policy.
2) No bonus was awarded under the profit growth element of the bonus scheme, in line with policy. This bonus is only awarded to the executive directors and not the employee directors, Hudson Simmons and Deborah Whittingham. 3) Existing executive directors receive either pension contributions, equivalent to 12% of salary, to the stakeholder pension plan or salary in lieu of pension contributions. Additional pension payments are made, equivalent to 2% of salary for 25–29 years' service, a further 2% for 30–34 years' service and a further 2% at 35+ years' service. Su Cacioppo, John Hutson and Ben Whitley took, in salary, the portion of their Company pension contribution which was above the annual cap. For newly appointed executive directors they receive pension contributions at 6% which aligns with contributions of the wider workforce.
4) The amount in the table under long-term incentives, includes the monetary value of the share awards which have taken place during the period for both SIP and RSP payments which took place during October 2021 and March 2022. The above table is on a cash basis and does not include the monetary value for the share awards that will take place in October 2022. These have been accrued within note 5.
5) Ben Thorne was appointed a non-executive director on 17 December 2020. In FY21, Ben Thorne's remuneration is shown from the date of his appointment.
6) Deborah Whittingham and Hudson Simmons were appointed as employee directors on 20 December 2021. In addition to the employee director's fees above, both received earnings from the Company as an employee. 7) James Ullman was appointed personnel and retail audit director on 4 May 2022. James Ullman's remuneration is
shown from the date of his appointment. He has not been included in the long-term Incentive award table on page 75 owing to these awards taking place prior to 4 May 2022.
The final amount received by executive directors for long-term incentive awards will be affected by future changes in the Company's share price. A 50% increase in the share price between the award date and the vesting date would increase the value of the award by 50%. Conversely, a 50% reduction would reduce the value of the award by 50%.
As at the date of the remuneration policy, the average employer contribution across all levels (pubs and head office) for the stakeholder plan was 5.4%, with the average employer contribution across all levels (head office only) for the stakeholder plan being 6.2%.
Details of targets applicable during the year are disclosed in the directors' remuneration policy statement. The resultant percentages against each of the bonus measures achieved are shown below, with the percentage awarded for each director being the same.
| Maximum | Awarded | B Whitley | J Hutson | S Cacioppo | J Ullman | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Profit growth | 45.0% | 0.0% | - | - | - | - |
| Total performance bonus | 45.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Employee share scheme | 25.0% | 25.0% | 62,452 | 186,108 | 104,478 | - |
| Employee share scheme – long service* | 10.0% | 10.0% | – | 63,808 | 35,820 | - |
| Deferred Bonus scheme | 100.0% | 25.0% | 62,500 | 159,591 | 89,595 | 11,250 |
| Total long term incentives | 130.0% | 55.0% | 124,952 | 382,921 | 214,968 | 11,250 |
| Total | 175.0% | 55.0% | 124,952 | 382,921 | 214,968 | 11,250 |
*J Hutson and S Cacioppo receive an additional 10%, as they have completed 30 years' service with the Company. James Ullman was appointed personnel and retail audit director on 4 May 2022. James Ullman's bonus measures are shown from the date of his appointment.
| Number of shares | Face value in £ | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| *Share incentive plan |
**Deferred bonus scheme |
Total | Share incentive plan |
Deferred bonus scheme |
Total | |
| B Whitley | 6,807 | 15,447 | 22,254 | 62,452 | 62,500 | 124,952 |
| J Hutson | 24,342 | 39,444 | 63,786 | 223,330 | 159,591 | 382,921 |
| S Cacioppo | 13,665 | 21,144 | 34,809 | 125,373 | 89,595 | 214.968 |
| 44,814 | 76,035 | 120,849 | 411,155 | 311,686 | 722,841 |
*Awarded at an average share price of £10.90, three days before grant; shares will vest three years after grant. **Calculated at an estimated share price of £4.05, which is the share price five days before grant date. The actual award will be determined by using the share price five days after the grant date.The grant date will be 7 October 2022. These shares vest in three equal tranches in each of 2022, 2023 and 2024.
All awards have no further performance conditions attached, except to be employed by the Company at the vesting date.
The interests of the directors in the shares of the Company, as at 31 July 2022, were as follows:
| Ordinary shares of 2p each, held beneficially | |
|---|---|
| Shares | Share incentive plan |
Deferred bonus scheme |
2022 | Shares | Share incentive plan |
Deferred bonus scheme |
2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| T R Martin | 28,174,709 | – | – | 28,174,709 | 28,174,709 | – | – | 28,174,709 |
| B Whitley | 14,064 | 11,893 | – | 25,957 | 12,287 | 8,987 | 723 | 21,997 |
| J Hutson | 156,219 | 40,399 | – | 196,618 | 152,035 | 30,013 | 2,036 | 184,084 |
| S Cacioppo | 35,479 | 22,679 | – | 58,158 | 38,616 | 16,848 | 1,143 | 56,607 |
| J Ullman | 22,629 | 7,804 | – | 30,433 | – | – | – | – |
| H Simmons | 1,003 | 1,619 | – | 2,622 | – | – | – | – |
| D Whittingham | 2,969 | 3,023 | – | 5,992 | – | – | – | – |
| B Thorne | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – |
| D van Gene | 3,777 | – | – | 3,777 | 3,777 | – | – | 3,777 |
| R Beckett | 2,000 | – | – | 2,000 | 2,000 | – | – | 2,000 |
| H Morley | 3,111 | – | – | 3,111 | 3,111 | – | – | 3,111 |
With the exception of partnership shares, there have been no changes to these interests since 31 July 2022.
Su Cacioppo and Ben Whitley are participants of the partnership share scheme and acquired 218 shares each in the year. John Hutson is a participant in the partnership share scheme and acquired 217 shares in the year. Deborah Whittingham was also a participant of the partnership share scheme and acquired 141 shares in the year. The market price of the shares purchased ranged 567.0–1,155.0p.
Partnership shares are shares which can be purchased by individuals who work in the Company for a duration of time. Participants can elect to purchase these shares which come out each employee's payroll.
This graph shows the total shareholder return (with dividends reinvested) of a holding of the Company's shares against a hypothetical holding of shares in the FTSE All-Share Travel & Leisure sector index. The directors selected this index, as it contains most of the Company's competitors and is considered to be the most appropriate index for the Company.
| Single figure of total remuneration |
Performance bonus payment achieved against maximum possible |
Long-term incentives scheme shares vesting against maximum possible* |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| John Hutson | £000 | % | % |
| 2022 | 1,017 | - | 100 |
| 2021 | 813 | - | 100 |
| 2020 | 738 | - | 100 |
| 2019 | 1,035 | 10 | 100 |
| 2018 | 1,490 | 29 | 100 |
| 2017 | 1,698 | 85 | 100 |
| 2016 | 1,187 | 21 | 100 |
| 2015 | 1,202 | 10 | 100 |
| 2014 | 741 | 19 | 100 |
| 2013 | 1,079 | 43 | 100 |
* As long-term incentive scheme shares issued have no further performance criteria attached, all shares previously awarded vest in full when the vesting date is reached.
The following table compares the change in remuneration of all the directors, non-executive directors and chairman with that of all employees
| Change in annual salary |
Change in taxable benefits |
Change in annual bonus |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| % | % | % | |
| Ben Whitley | - | 45.0 | - |
| John Hutson | - | 63.6 | - |
| Su Cacioppo | - | 58.3 | - |
| Tim Martin | - | (7.1) | - |
| Debra Van Gene | - | - - |
|
| Richard Beckett | - | - - |
|
| Harry Morley | - | - - |
|
| Ben Thorne | - | - - |
|
| Total Employees | 3.7 | 13.4 | 64.2 |
Change in total employees' salary is calculated based on the amounts paid to all employees adjusted for redundancy and employer's national insurance payments, divided by the number of hours worked by employees.
The table below shows the chief executive's total remuneration, as disclosed in the single-figure table, compared with that of full-time equivalent employees' median (50th), 25th and 75th percentiles in the UK.
Pay ratios table
| Year | Method | 25th | 50th | 75th |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | Option B | 47:1 | 45:1 | 41:1 |
| 2021 | Option B | 41:1 | 40:1 | 38:1 |
The Company has used the same data used for gender pay reporting to determine the median, 25th and 75th percentile employees. This method is called option B in The Companies (Miscellaneous Reporting) Regulation 2018.
It is believed that using a consistent methodology with that of gender pay reporting will produce the most understandable ratios.
There has been no comparison between dividends and share buy-backs this year, as there has been no such events in the current and previous financial year.
The remuneration committee comprises the following independent directors: Debra van Gene (chair), Sir Richard Beckett, Ben Thorne and Harry Morley.
The committee meets regularly and considers executive directors' remuneration annually. It approves all contractual and compensation arrangements for the executive directors, including performance-related payments.
The table below shows the voting outcomes at the 18 November 2021 AGM for the directors' remuneration report.
| Number of | % of | |
|---|---|---|
| votes | votes | |
| For | 93,104,202 | 92.36% |
| Against | 7,666,690 | 7.61% |
| Abstentions | 37,197 | 0.03% |
| Total cast | 100,808,089 | 100.00% |
All votes at the AGM were passed with at least 80% of the cast votes.
The table below shows the voting outcomes at the 17 December 2020 AGM for the directors' remuneration policy.
| Number of votes |
% of votes |
|
|---|---|---|
| For | 86,184,868 | 84.88% |
| Against | 14,880,202 | 14.65% |
| Abstentions | 477,476 | 0.47% |
| Total cast | 101,542,546 | 100.00% |
Resolutions at last year's AGM seeking the re-election of Sir Richard Beckett and Debra Van Gene received less than 80% of the total votes cast.
The Company has stated, on numerous occasions, its view that the Company benefits from the experience of directors who have served more than nine years and does not agree that it impacts the individual's independence.
The company has continued to engage with shareholders regarding its views on board composition and intends doing so going forwards.
By order of the board
Nigel Connor Company Secretary 6 October 2022
This section of the report sets out how the Company has applied the relevant principles and provisions of the 2018 code and identifies and explains where it has not.
The Company's approach is set out on page 79
Details of our governance and management structure are set out on page 80
The board's approach to these areas via the work of the nomination committee and the Company's employment policies are set out on page 83
An outline of our internal processes in this area set out on pages 81-84
A report on how the Company has applied the current remuneration policy and payments made to directors during the period is on pages 69-77.
The Company is committed to high standards of corporate governance. The board believes that the Company has been compliant with the code throughout the 53 weeks ended 31 July 2022, except as described below.
The code indicates that the chairman should discuss governance and strategy with major shareholders. The chairman has had many discussions with shareholders since the Company's flotation in 1992, although corporate governance has rarely been raised. The majority of discussions with major shareholders now takes place among the CEO, finance director and shareholders. These discussions are relayed to, and considered by, the board. The chairman and senior independent director met a number of major shareholders to discuss the appointment of employee directors to the board. The chairman is available for discussion with major shareholders, when requested.
Debra van Gene and Sir Richard Beckett have served more than nine years on the board and so may not be considered independent under the code. The board considers that their performance as non-executive directors continues to be effective.
They contribute significantly as directors through their individual skills, considerable knowledge and experience of the Company. They also continue to demonstrate strong independence in the manner in which they discharge their responsibilities as directors. Consequently, the board has concluded that, despite their length of tenure, there is no association with management which could compromise their independence.
Tim Martin has served more than nine years as chairman of the board. The board considers that his considerable knowledge and experience from founding the Company and leading it for over 40 years have had a positive effect on the Company's performance. The board believes that it is in the interest of the Company and its shareholders for Tim Martin to remain as chairman.
A requirement of corporate governance is a recommendation for a third party to evaluate the functioning of the board. Delegation of a key task of the chairman and of the directors of the board itself to a third party, often with little or no connection with the Company's business and with a very limited knowledge of the directors, may be a dangerous step for a board to take. It is the function of the board itself to evaluate its own performance – and that performance is most evident from the results of the underlying business. For this reason, it is believed best for the Company to continue with its current system of 'self-evaluation'.
To promote long-term shareholdings by executive directors and align their interests with shareholders, the code requires that any share awards given to executive directors should have a minimum vesting period of five years. The executive directors receive shares under schemes which are open to other employees and have vesting periods of less than five years. The Company has disclosed details of the share award schemes in the remuneration policy on pages 70–71. To promote long-term shareholding by executive directors, the Company requires directors to hold a minimum number of shares as disclosed on page 72. Restrictions are in place on the sale of shares, if directors have not achieved the minimum holding.
38 – Alignment of pension contribution rate of executive directors with wider workforce
The code states that pension contribution rates for executive directors and payments in lieu, should be aligned with those available to the workforce. As set out in the 2020 remuneration policy, the company took the decision that existing executive directors would continue to receive 12% of base salary on the basis
that it had never been excessive, is lower than average for a FTSE 250 company and is not disproportionate to the wider workforce. In August 2022, the company changed its employee pension policy to reward long service rather than being based on rank/job title. As a consequence the existing pension contributions paid to executive directors are now more closely aligned with thepolicy applicable to the wider workforce.
A full version of the code is available on the official website of the Financial Reporting Council: frc.org.uk
The board comprises the following members:
Will Fotheringham and Emma Gibson attend board meetings in their capacity as associate employee directors.
The board considers each of Debra van Gene, Sir Richard Beckett, Ben Thorne and Harry Morley to be independent.
Biographies of all non-executive and executive directors are provided on page 65 and can be viewed on the Company's website: jdwetherspoon.com
The chairman regularly meets the non-executive directors and evaluates the performance of the board, its committees and its individual directors.
The Company's purpose and how it establishes its values and culture through engagement with employees are disclosed on page 51.
The board expects the directors to declare any conflicts of interest and does not believe that any material conflicts of interest exist.
The board takes measures to ensure that all board members are kept aware of both the views of major shareholders and changes in the major shareholdings of the Company. Efforts made to accomplish effective communication include:
Annual general meeting, considered to be
an important forum for shareholders to raise questions with the board
Regular feedback from the Company's stockbrokers Interim, full and ongoing announcements circulated
to shareholders
Any significant changes in shareholder movement being notified to the board by the company secretary, when necessary
The company secretary maintaining procedures and agreements for all announcements to the Stock Market A programme of regular meetings between investors and directors of the Company
The following matters are reserved for the board:
Strategic, financing or adoption of new business plans, in respect of any material aspect of the Company
Institution of legal proceedings, where costs exceed certain values
The board monitors the culture and the values of the Company in several ways:
The appointment of employee directors to the board
| Meeting and talking with employees from our pubs during pub visits, regional meetings and at head office weekly meetings Attendance of area managers at the opening section of the board meetings to discuss issues relating to the operation of their pubs and the Company generally Reviewing the outcome of weekly discussion meetings of selected pub and area managers led by senior Company employees |
Reviewing whistleblowing reports and outcomes via the audit committee Division of responsibilities It is not advantageous, in a company like Wetherspoon, for there to be high barriers or exaggerated distinctions between the role of chairman and that of chief executive officer. However, some general distinctions are outlined overleaf. |
|---|---|
| Chairman's responsibility | Chief executive officer's responsibility |
| The chairman is responsible for the smooth running of the board and ensuring that all directors are fully informed of matters relevant to their roles |
The chief executive officer is responsible for the smooth daily running of the business |
| Delegated responsibility of authority from the Company to exchange contracts for new pubs and to sign all contracts with suppliers |
Developing and maintaining effective management controls, planning and performance measurements |
| Providing support, advice and feedback to the chief executive officer |
Maintaining and developing an effective organisational structure |
| Supporting the Company's strategy and encouraging the chief executive officer with that strategy's development. |
External and internal communications, in conjunction with the chairman, on any issues facing the Company |
| Chairing general meetings, board meetings, operational meetings and agreeing on board agendas and ensuring that adequate time is available for discussion of agenda items |
Implementing and monitoring compliance with board policies |
| Management of the chief executive officer's contract, appraisal and remuneration, by way of making recommendations to the remuneration committee |
Timely and accurate reporting of the above to the board |
| Providing support to executive directors and senior managers of the Company |
Recruiting and managing senior managers in the business |
| Helping to provide the 'ethos' and 'vision' of the Company, after discussions and debates with employees of all levels, customers, shareholders and including organisations such as CAMRA |
Developing and maintaining effective risk-management and regulatory controls |
| Helping to provide information on customers and employees' views by calling on pubs |
Maintaining primary relationships with shareholders and investors |
| Helping to make directors aware of shareholders' concerns Chairing the management board responsible for | implementing the Company's strategy |
| Helping to ensure that a culture of openness and debate exists in the Company |
|
| Ensuring compliance with the London Stock Exchange and legal and regulatory requirements, in consultation with the board and the Company's external advisers |
The board has several established committees as set out below. The board met eight times during the year ending 31 July 2022. Attendance of the directors,non-executives, employee and associate employee directors where appropriate, is shown below.
| Number of meetings held in the year | Board 8 |
Audit 4 |
Remuneration 1 |
Nomination 2 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tim Martin | 8 | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| John Hutson | 5 | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| Su Cacioppo | 8 | 4 | N/A | N/A |
| Ben Whitley | 8 | 4 | N/A | N/A |
| Debra van Gene | 7 | 4 | 1 | 2 |
| Sir Richard Beckett | 7 | 4 | 1 | 2 |
| Harry Morley | 8 | 4 | 1 | 2 |
| Nigel Connor | 8 | 4 | N/A | N/A |
| Ben Thorne | 8 | 4 | 1 | 1 |
| James Ullman | 2 | 4 | N/A | N/A |
| Debbie Whittingham | 7 | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| Will Fotheringham | 7 | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| Hudson Simmons | 6 | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| Emma Gibson | 7 | N/A | N/A | N/A |
The committee's primary role is to assist the board in the provision of effective governance over the Company's financial reporting, risk management and internal control; in particular, it performs the following activities:
Assumes direct responsibility for the appointment, compensation, resignation and dismissal of the external auditors, including review of the external audit, its cost and effectiveness
Reviews the independence of the external auditors, including consideration of the level of non-audit work carried out by them
Reviews the scope and nature of the work to be performed by the external auditors, before audit commences
Reviews the half-year and annual
financial statements
Ensures compliance with accounting standards and monitors the integrity of the financial statements and formal announcements relating to the financial performance of the Company and supports the board in its responsibility to ensure that the annual financial statements are fair, balanced and understandable Reviews the internal audit plan, which is updated to reflect the changing needs of the business and the concerns of management and the audit committee Reviews and raises questions on all internal audit reports and requests management to adjust the prioritisation of mitigating actions, as needed. Areas reviewed this year included supply chain and distribution centre, pub closures, system security, IT, cyber-crime, changes in business environment, decline in like-for-like sales volume and escalating costs of labour
Reviews, with the support of specialists as required, controls over access to the IT systems used around the business and agrees with management on the timing of any mitigating actions to be carried out
Reviews and monitors procedures in relation to the Company's whistleblowing policy
Reviews and questions the effectiveness of all risk-management and internal control systems Reviews the retail audit director's statement on internal controls on completed audits
Considers the overall impact on the business of the matters arisen from the various reviews described above and any other matters which the auditors, internal or external, may bring to the attention of the committee
Ensures that all matters, where appropriate, are raised and brought to the attention of the board
The accounting policies of the Company and the estimates and judgements made by management are assessed by the committee for their suitability. The following areas are those considered by the committee, to be the most significant:
The provision for the impairment of fixed assets – several judgements are used in making this calculation, primarily on expected future sales and profits. The committee received reports and questioned management on the calculations made and the assumptions used
Significant one-off items of expense or income are reported as exceptional on the face of the income statement. All exceptional items are reviewed by the committee
The ongoing application of IFRS 16 – Lease to the Company's lease portfolio, including the accounting for lease modifications and the application of the COVID-19 related rent concession practical expedient along with the presentation and disclosure of leases.
The committee reviewed the financial plans, modelled scenarios and assumptions made by the Company in support of the presentation of the financial statements on a going concern basis
The committee reviewed and raised questions
on the calculations made by the Company in relation to
the hedge accounting and effectiveness for interestrate swaps
The committee is satisfied that the judgements made by management are reasonable and that appropriate disclosures have been included in the accounts.
During the year, the Company made no use of specialist teams from Grant Thornton UK LLP, relating to accounting or tax services. The fees paid to Grant Thornton UK LLP for non-audit services were £55,000 (2021: £33,000), relating to interim review procedures. The use of Grant Thornton UK LLP for non-audit work is monitored regularly, to achieve the necessary independence and objectivity of the auditors. Where the auditors provide non-audit services, their objectivity and independence are safeguarded by the use of different teams. See note 2 on page 15, for a breakdown of the auditor's remuneration for audit and non-audit services.
The audit committee is responsible for making recommendations to appoint, reappoint or remove external auditors. Following a review by the audit committee, the board agreed to recommend the reappointment of Grant Thornton UK LLP as external auditors at the AGM in November 2022.
The audit committee keeps under review the regulatory requirements on audit-tendering and rotation. The Company will be required to change its audit firm for the year ending 25 July 2038, at the latest. The audit was last tendered in 2018 – and Grant Thornton UK LLP has been in place as the Company's auditor for five years.
The disclosures provided within this report constitute the Company's statement of compliance with the requirement of the statutory audit services for large companies market investigation (Mandatory use of competitive tender processes and audit committee responsibilities) order 2014.
The audit committee assesses the ongoing effectiveness of the external auditors and audit process, on the basis of meetings and internal reviews with finance and other senior executives.
In reviewing the independence of the external auditors, the audit committee considers several factors. These include the standing, experience and tenure of the external auditors, the nature and level of services provided and confirmation from the external auditors that they have complied with relevant UK independence standards. The terms of reference of the audit committee are available on the Company's website.
The board is responsible for the Company's risk-management process.
The internal audit department, in conjunction with feedback from senior management of the business functions, produces a risk register annually.
The identified risks are assessed, based on the likelihood of a risk occurring and the potential impact to the business, should the risk materialise.
The retail audit director determines and reviews the risk-assessment process and will communicate the timetable annually.
The risk register is presented to the audit committee and management board annually, with a schedule of audit work agreed on, on a rolling basis. The purpose of this work is to review, on behalf of the Company and the board, those key risks and the systems of control necessary to manage such risks.
Where recommendations are made for changes in systems or processes to reduce risk, internal audit will follow up regularly to ensure that the recommendations are implemented.
No significant failings of internal control were identified during these reviews.
A summary of the financial risks and treasury policies can be found on pages 52-53, together with other risks and uncertainties.
The Company monitors emerging risks through the receipt of advice and feedback from head office and pub staff, customers, suppliers, and several external advisers and by maintaining an awareness of the wider economic, political and social environment.
Any potential risks identified will be discussed in the relevant internal meetings, where any potential impact on the business will be considered. Any significant risks identified will be added to the Company's risk register.
During the year, the Company provided an internal audit and risk-management function. The creation of a system of internal control and risk mitigation is a key part of the Company's operations and culture. The board is responsible for maintaining a sound system of internal control and reviewing its effectiveness. The function can only manage, rather than entirely eliminate, the risk of failure to achieve business objectives. It can provide only reasonable, and not absolute, assurance against material misstatement or loss. Ongoing reviews, assessments and management of significant risks took place throughout the year under review and up to the date of the approval of the annual report.
The Company has an internal audit function which is discharged as follows:
Health and safety visits, ensuring compliance with Company procedures
Reviewing and assessing the impact of
legislative and regulatory change
Risk-management process, identifying key risks facing the business
The Company has key controls, as follows: Authority limits and controls over cash-handling, purchasing commitments and capital expenditure A budgeting process, with a detailed 12-month operating plan and a mid-term financial plan, both approved by the board
Business results reported weekly, with a report compared with budget and the previous year
Forecasts prepared regularly throughout the year, for review by the board
Complex treasury instruments are not used. The Company, from time to time, as stated in this report and accounts, enters into swap arrangements which fix interest rates at certain levels for a number of years and enters into supply arrangements with fixed prices for electricity and gas, for example, which run for between one and three years
An annual review of the amount of external insurance which it obtains, bearing in mind the availability of such cover, its costs and the likelihood of the risks involved
Regular evaluation of processes and controls, in relation to the Company's financial reporting requirements
The directors confirm that they have reviewed the effectiveness of the system of internal control.
The committee is responsible for determining the remuneration received by executive directors and senior managers. When setting levels of remuneration, the committee seeks to ensure that they are sufficient to attract and retain people with the necessary skills and experience. The committee seeks to ensure that remuneration is not excessive and is in line with amounts paid by comparable companies. In setting executive directors' remuneration, the committee takes into account wider workforce remuneration policies throughout the Company, with many elements extending throughout much of the Company at varying levels according to seniority and length of service.
The remuneration policy operated as intended during the year – no changes were made and normally no discretion is applied. However, during the current year, discretion was applied in respect of the deferred bonus percentage which was awarded to all participants.
The directors' report on remuneration is set out on pages 69–77.
Directors' remuneration is clearly presented in the accounts. The remuneration policy is clearly stated, with the calculation of performance measures explained. The remuneration policy does not rely overly on target-based incentives, with share awards normally given based on profits, earnings per share and owners' earnings growth, as well as some shares awarded without performance targets as part of a
Companywide scheme. However, during the current year no such award was given based on such targets.
Awards made are predictable and within a range of values. The remuneration committee can apply discretion in the application of awards.
The terms of reference of the remuneration committee are available on the Company's website.
The committee meets at least annually and: reviews the board structure, size, diversity (including gender), composition and successional needs, keeping under review the balance of membership between executive and non-executive and the required blend of skills, experience, knowledge and independence on the board.
formally proposes any new executive or nonexecutive directors for the approval of the whole board, following a reasonable process for such an appointment. This includes a review of skill set, industry knowledge and experience to meet the strategic needs of the business.
reviews the leadership and successional needs of the organisation, with a view to ensuring the long-term success of the Company.
ensures that all directors offer themselves for annual re-election by shareholders.
No director is involved in any decision about his or her own reappointment. In carrying out these activities, the non-executive directors follow the guidelines of the Chartered Governance Institute and comply with the code.
The terms of reference of the nomination committee are available on the Company's website.
In December 2021, the Company appointed two employee directors to the full board of the Company and two associate employee directors who attend board meetings. On 4 May 2022, the Company announced the retirement of Su Cacioppo and the appointment of James Ullman to the board. Sir Richard Beckett will retire as a non-executive director after the Company's AGM on 17 November 2022 at which he will not seek re-election. No other board changes have been made.
Staff are encouraged to make a commitment to the Company's success and to progress to more senior roles as they develop.
In selecting, training and promoting staff, the Company has to take account of the physically demanding nature of much of its work. The Company is committed to equality of opportunity and to the elimination of discrimination in employment.
The Company aims to create and maintain a working environment, terms and conditions of employment and personnel and management practices which ensure that no individual receives less favourable treatment on the grounds of his or her race, religion or belief, nationality, ethnic origin, age, disability, gender
(including gender reassignment), sexual orientation, part-time status or marital status.
Employees who become disabled will be retained, where possible, and retrained, where necessary.
The Company has established a range of policies, covering issues such as diversity, employees' wellbeing and equal opportunities, aimed at ensuring that all employees are treated fairly and consistently.
The Company has also established the following network groups to foster discussion and generate ideas about these issues: LGBTQIA+ Women
Race and ethnic diversity
Internal communications seek to ensure that staff are well informed about the Company's progress, through the use of regular digital newsletters, and staff liaison meetings, at which employees' views are discussed and taken into account.
All pub staff participate in bonus schemes related to sales, profits, stocks and service standards.
Approved by order of the board
Nigel Connor Company Secretary 6 October 2022
| Shares of 2p each | Number of shareholders |
% of total shareholders |
Number % of total shares held |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Up to 2,500 | 3,626 | 88.1 | 1,557,514 | 1.2 |
| 2,501–10,000 | 235 | 5.7 | 1,137,221 | 0.9 |
| 10,001–250,000 | 195 | 4.8 | 11,538,554 | 9.0 |
| 250,001–500,000 | 23 | 0.5 | 8,301,695 | 6.4 |
| 500,001–1,000,000 | 12 | 0.3 | 8,309,785 | 6.5 |
| Over 1,000,000 | 24 | 0.6 | 97,905,386 | 76.0 |
| 4,115 |
100.0 |
128,750,155 |
100.0 |
Source: Computershare Investor Services plc
The Company has been notified of the following substantial holdings in its share capital at 31 July 2022:
| Number of ordinary shares |
% of share capital |
|
|---|---|---|
| Tim Martin | 28,174,709 | 21.9 |
| Columbia Threadneedle Investments | 13,824,766 | 10.7 |
| FIL Investment International | 7,071,516 | 5.5 |
| MFS Investment Management | 6,498,779 | 5.1 |
| J D Wetherspoon plc Company Share Plan* | 4,416,005 | 3.4 |
| Artemis Investment Management | 4,397,259 | 3.4 |
| Hargreaves Lansdown Asset Management | 3,797,892 | 3.0 |
| Fidelity Investments | 3,765,322 | 2.9 |
Source: Investec Bank plc. This schedule shows the consolidated shareholdings of individuals and companies, whereas the first table shows shareholdings by individual holding.
*This represents shares which have been purchased by the Company for the benefit of employees under the SIP. Please see pages 70–71. This includes vested shares held by employees.
| 25 July 2021 | 1,124p |
|---|---|
| Low | 516p |
| High | 1,180p |
| 31 July 2022 | 557p |
If you have a query about your shareholding, please contact the Company's registrars directly: Computershare Investor Services plc: uk.computershare.com/investor 0370 707 1091
Paper copies of this annual report are available from the company secretary, at the registered office.
E-mail: [email protected]
This annual report is available on the Company's website: jdwetherspoon.com/investors-home
| Name | Address | Town/City | Postcode | Country |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Keavan's Port | 1-5 Camden Street Upper | Dublin | D02 TC61 | Ireland |
| The South Strand | 1 Hanover Quay | Dublin | D02 E295 | Ireland |
| The Scarsdale Hundred | 2 Sevenairs Road | Sheffield | S20 1NZ | England |
| The Navigation Inn | 1 Wharf Road | Birmingham | B30 3LS | England |
| An Geata Arundel | 9 Arundel Square | Waterford | X91 RD35 | Ireland |
| The Raymond Mays | 44–48 North Street | Bourne | PE10 9AB | England |
| The Prense Well | 5 The Mount | Heswall | CH60 4RE | England |
| Name | Address | Town/City | Postcode | Country |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| St Georges Hall | 203 Church Road | Bristol | BS5 9HL | England |
| The Vulcan | 181 Main Street | Coatbridge | ML5 3HH | Scotland |
| The Running Horses (Lloyds) | Water Street/ Chalon Way | St Helens | WA10 1PY | England |
| The Pear Tree | 25–27 Alcester Road South | Birmingham | B14 7JQ | England |
| The Drum | 557–559 Lea Bridge Road | Leyton | E10 7EQ | England |
| The Three Tun Tavern | 1–5 Temple Road, Carysford Avenue | Dublin | A94 Y5F1 | Ireland |
| The Milan Bar | 14–32 High Street | Croydon | CR0 1YA | England |
| The Oyster Rooms | Unit 3, Fulham Broadway Centre | Fulham | SW6 1AA | England |
| The Looking Glass | 41–43 Buttermarket Street | Warrington | WA1 2LY | England |
| The London Bar | South Terminal, Airside, Gatwick Airport | Crawley | RH6 0NN | England |
| The Skylark | 34–36 South End | Croydon | CR0 1DP | England |
| The Robert Peel | 5–10 Market Place | Bury | BL9 0LD | England |
| The Christopher Creeke | 2 Holdenhurst Road | Bournemouth | BH8 8AD | England |
| The Bell Hotel | 40 Market Square | Aylesbury | HP20 1TX | England |
| The Windlesora | 17 William Street | Windsor | SL4 1BB | England |
Wetherspoon House
Central Park Reeds Crescent Watford WD24 4QL
Computershare Investor Services plc PO Box 82 The Pavilions Bridgwater Road Bristol BS99 6ZY
Grant Thornton UK LLP Chartered Accountants and Statutory Auditors 30 Finsbury Square London EC2A 1AG
Macfarlanes LLP 20 Cursitor Street London EC4A 1LT
Allied Irish Banks Banco de Sabadell S.A London Branch Barclays Bank plc BNP Paribas Clydesdale Bank plc Co Operative Rabbobank U.A Crédit Industriel et Commercial. Handelsbanken Bank HSBC Bank plc Mediobanca S.p.A MUFG Bank Ltd National Westminster Bank plc Santander UK plc The Governor and Company of the Bank of Ireland
Rushe Advisors
Stockbrokers Investec Bank plc
J D Wetherspoon plc Wetherspoon House, Central Park Reeds Crescent, Watford, WD24 4QL
Building tools?
Free accounts include 100 API calls/year for testing.
Have a question? We'll get back to you promptly.