Management Reports • Apr 28, 2010
Management Reports
Open in ViewerOpens in native device viewer
In the 2009 financial year, worldwide economic development was impacted by the most severe recession since the war. Real GDP dropped in almost all regions due to the global financial and economic crisis, with the industrialized countries recording the strongest declines (-3.6%). Real global GDP decreased significantly by 2.3% compared to the previous year. After the economic slump at year-end 2008, the beginning of the second half of 2009 saw a reversal of this global downward trend, mostly due to growth impulses from Asia.
In the year under review, worldwide economic development was marked by the collapse of international trade and a strong decline in demand for consumer goods. As well as all industrialized countries, the recession also hit the emerging markets and, most of all, the export-dependent economies. However, thanks to the concerted efforts of both national central banks and governments, the situation on the international financial markets was at least partially stabilized. Furthermore, intensified fiscal counter-measures in the form of economic stimulus programmes contributed to mitigating the economic slump in the course of the reporting year.
The recession, which had already started to unfold in the second half of 2008, hit Europe with full force in the 2009 financial year. The reasons behind this recession were the financial crisis and thus a contraction in consumption and investing activities, destocking of inventories and a drop in exports. In contrast to last year's development, real GDP showed a strong decline within the EU in the reporting year (2008: +0.8%; 2009: -4.1%). Only in the second half of 2009 did numerous companies start to restock their inventories, which had been destocked during the first half-year, resulting in a slight increase in the level of capacity utilization which up to that point had been very low. At the same time, state economic stimulus programmes started to prove effective by supporting both private and public consumption.
The problematic development of the world economy during the year under review, as a result of the global crisis on the international financial markets, led to a strong decline in sales in the automotive industry throughout the most important markets. The European automotive production volumes dropped from 18.5 million to 15 million vehicle units.
Passenger cars (in million units)
Source: www.acea.be/company internal graphics
The most important customers of the Group recorded considerable declines in sales due to the dramatic drop in new car registrations in 2009. According to a survey carried out by the management consulting company Roland Berger, global sales in the automotive supply industry declined by 25%.
This downward trend was, amongst other, mitigated by the introduction of vehicle scrappage premiums by the governments, which mostly benefited manufacturers of small passenger cars, and therefore had only a limited impact on the POLYTEC GROUP, as the group is mainly orientated toward premium manufacturers.
While passenger car sales will probably be negatively impacted by the termination of scrappage schemes, an order backlog is anticipated over the short term in the premium segment. The trend on the automotive market is generally shifting toward more lightweight and eco-friendly vehicles, high-value fittings and greater customization. Given its product portfolio focused on weight reduction and its extensive experience in the premium car segment, the Group is poised to benefit from this trend. The German manufacturers started the current 2010 business year with a resumption of the growth trend.
The restructuring programme of the POLYTEC GROUP, which was agreed upon by the financing banks and the company and unanimously approved by an extraordinary General Meeting on June 26, 2009 envisaged, among other things, the disposal of the PEGUFORM GROUP (which had been acquired in the 2008 financial year), with the exception of the two plants (Weiden and Chodova Plana) belonging to the Automotive Composites Division. Thus, the PEGUFORM GROUP, with the exception of the two aforementioned plants, is to be classified as "held for sale" pursuant to IFRS 5 and consequently divested from the Automotive Systems Division.
With regard to the revenue and earnings development of both the Group and the Automotive Systems Division, it should be noted that the divestment of the PEGUFORM GROUP reported in the Notes to the Consolidated Accounts under D. 10 permits only a partial comparison with the audited financial statements of the 2008 business year.
To allow better comparability and, therefore, a more accurate assessment of the development of results, reported figures for the 2008 financial year also include figures adjusted for the effects of the acquisition of PEGUFORM GROUP.
In the following Group Management Report, the financial figures for the year under review have also been adjusted for the effects of the acquisition of the PEGUFORM GROUP, which was deconsolidated as of July 31, 2009 and whose contribution to results has been classified as "result from divested divisions".
Against the backdrop of strong declines in production volumes within the passenger car, heavy-goods and commercial vehicle segments as a result of the global economic recession, Group sales dropped by 21.0% to EUR 607.0 million, with the two former PEGUFORM GROUP plants, consequently rebranded as POLYTEC Composites Bohemia and POLYTEC Composites Weiden, contributing EUR 34 million to total sales figures.
Key financial figures showed the following development in the year under review:
| Earnings figures of the Group | Units | 2009 | 2008 comparable |
2008 | 2007 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sales | EUR million | 607.0 | 768.3 | 1,081.5 | 665.0 |
| EBITDA | EUR million | 10.2 | 50.2 | 65.0 | 63.7 |
| EBITDA margin (EBITDA/sales) | % | 1.7 | 6.5 | 6.0 | 9.6 |
| EBIT before restructuring costs | EUR million | -22.4 | 13.9 | 16.7 | 41.0 |
| EBIT after restructuring costs | EUR million | -30.2 | 13.9 | 16.7 | 41.0 |
| EBIT margin (EBIT/sales) | % | -5.0 | 1.8 | 1.5 | 6.2 |
| Net profit from continued operations EUR million | -51.4 | 9.8 | 3.0 | 37.3 | |
| Net profit margin (net profit/sales) | % | -8.5 | 1.3 | 0.3 | 5.6 |
| Earnings per share | EUR | -2.33 | 0.42 | 0.08 | 1.66 |
| Average capital employed | EUR million | 336.7 | n/a | 365.0 | 171.9 |
| ROCE before tax | % | -9.0 | n/a | 4.6 | 23.9 |
The downward market trend in the automotive industry and, most specifically, in the commercial vehicle segment which started unfolding at year-end 2008, continued throughout the reporting year resulting in a considerable decline in Group operating income, which turned negative. EBITDA remained positive totalling EUR 10.2 million, as the successful implementation of restructuring measures led to positive EBITDA margins in the second half of the reporting year.
Parallel to the development of Group EBIT, the result from continuing operations after taxes decreased to EUR -51.4 million compared to EUR 9.8 million in the previous year. The result on a pro-rata basis from the divestment of the PEGUFORM GROUP had an additional negative impact of EUR -38.7 million on Group figures.
This also applies to the restructuring costs totalling EUR 7.8 million reported in the profit and loss account. More detailed information about individual items is available in the Notes to the Consolidated Accounts under D. 7.
The contribution of the individual divisions to total sales figures has changed considerably in the year under review. Due to drastic declines in sales in the commercial vehicle segment, the Automotive Composites Division only accounted for 26% of total Group sales in 2009 after 36% in the previous year.
| Units | 2009 | 2008 comparable |
2008 | 2007 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sales | EUR million | 369.7 | 392.4 | 705.6 | 369.3 |
| Share of Group sales | % | 60.6 | 51.1 | 65.2 | 55.5 |
| EBITDA | EUR million | 1.4 | 3.5 | 18.3 | 25.8 |
| EBITDA margin (EBITDA/sales) | % | 0.4 | 0.9 | 2.6 | 7.0 |
| EBIT before restructuring costs | EUR million | -21.5 | -21.2 | -18.3 | 10.8 |
| EBIT after restructuring costs | EUR million | -23.7 | -21.2 | -18.3 | 10.8 |
| EBIT margin (EBIT/sales) | % | -6.4 | -5.4 | -2.6 | 2.9 |
| Net profit | EUR million | -21.5 | -24.1 | -30.9 | 4.1 |
| Net profit margin (net profit/sales) | % | -5.8 | -6.1 | -4.4 | 1.1 |
| Average capital employed | EUR million | 257.3 | n/a | 282.7 | 106.2 |
The Automotive Systems Division is the most important business unit of the POLYTEC GROUP, accounting for 61% of total Group sales. In the year under review, division sales declined by 5.8% to EUR 369.7 million and the result after taxes amounted to EUR -21.5 million, including one-off restructuring expenses of EUR 2.2 million for personnel downsizing measures as well as impairment charges following extraordinary amortization on fixed assets of EUR 3.9 million.
Part sales recorded a drop of 17.1% to EUR 310.3 million. Tooling sales increased from EUR 18.0 million to EUR 59.4 million mainly due to new projects started in the year under review.
The strong decline in part sales was attributable to the global economic recession and, most of all, to the wide range of sales incentive programmes which had proved ineffective for this division, as it mainly supplies premium car manufacturers.
Division EBIT amounted to EUR -23.7 million in 2009 compared to EUR -21.2 million in 2008. The previous year's figure included a one-off amortization of goodwill totalling EUR 6.3 million. Similarly, the 2009 comparative value includes the aforementioned one-off effects in the amount of EUR 6.1 million.
Earnings development principally reflected the downward trend of the automotive industry from Q4 2008 onward, although costsaving measures began to become effective as of the second half of 2009, resulting in a considerable improvement of EBIT compared to Q4 2008 (EUR -10.3 million).
| Unit | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sales | EUR million | 156.3 | 277.9 | 201.3 |
| Share of Group sales | % | 25.8 | 36.2 | 30.3 |
| EBITDA | EUR million | 0.5 | 32.7 | 24.9 |
| EBITDA margin (EBITDA/sales) | % | 0.4 | 11.8 | 12.4 |
| EBIT before restructuring costs | EUR million | -6.1 | 24.3 | 19.9 |
| EBIT after restructuring costs | EUR million | -7.8 | 24.3 | 19.9 |
| EBIT margin (EBIT/sales) | % | -5.0 | 8.8 | 9.9 |
| Net profit | EUR million | -12.8 | 14.4 | 23.7 |
| Net profit margin (net profit/sales) | % | -8.2 | 5.2 | 11.8 |
| Average capital employed | EUR million | 35.9 | 36.9 | 22.3 |
The development of the Automotive Composites Division was marked by a dramatic decline in both sales and earnings within the commercial vehicle segment. Division sales decreased by 43.8% to EUR 156.3 million in a year-on-year comparison, despite the first-time full-year contribution to total sales figures of the plants POLYTEC Composites Bohemia and POLY-TEC Composites Weiden in the amount of EUR 34 million. The strong (organic) drop in sales principally reflected the development of the commercial vehicle market, which registered a 64% decrease benchmarked against total European production volumes.
Due to the collapse in demand from Q4 2008 onward, the market is currently suffering from excess capacities and distorted cost structures due to investments made by suppliers on the basis of considerably higher turnover expectations. On the back of this negative development, capacities at all plants had to be brought in line with the anticipated lower production volumes. In addition to considerably downsizing leased staff, short-time working schemes were introduced at all corporate sites in the year under review. These successful remedial measures were also reflected in the quarterly development of EBITDA, which showed a considerable improvement over the course of the year, totalling EUR 0.5 million for the full-year 2009.
In the year under review, EBIT declined to EUR -7.8 million due to a drop in sales, whereas the previous year showed a positive EBIT of EUR 24.3 million mainly attributable to successful restructuring measures. This corresponds to a decline in the EBITDA margin from 8.8% to -5.0%.
As a consequence of the severe slump in the market, structural optimization measures were also implemented. After the successful closing of the Slovakian plant in Trnava at the end of 2008, at the beginning of the year, the closure of the plant in Sweden was initiated and had almost been completed by the end of the year. However, owing to the high closure expenses, the company was forced to file for insolvency at the beginning of 2010.
| Unit | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sales | EUR million | 64.3 | 77.7 | 74.7 |
| Share of Group sales | % | 10.6 | 10.1 | 11.3 |
| EBITDA | EUR million | 5.1 | 8.9 | 9.6 |
| EBITDA margin (EBITDA/sales) | % | 7.9 | 11.4 | 12.9 |
| EBIT | EUR million | 3.1 | 6.8 | 7.9 |
| EBIT margin (EBIT/sales) | % | 4.8 | 8.7 | 10.6 |
| Net profit | EUR million | 2.1 | 4.4 | 5.3 |
| Net profit margin (net profit/sales) | % | 3.3 | 5.7 | 7.1 |
| Average capital employed | EUR million | 33.0 | 34.7 | 33.0 |
Given the severity of the crisis, the Car Styling Division performed quite well. Nevertheless, the division was unable to completely buck the downward trend in the automotive industry and showed a decline in both sales and earnings in the year under review. Division sales amounted to EUR 64.3 million and EBIT to EUR 3.1 million, with the EBIT margin totalling 4.8%.
In view of the current trend toward the increased personalization of passenger cars, market opportunities for this division are still regarded as favorable.
| Unit | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sales | EUR million | 16.8 | 20.3 | 19.6 |
| Share of Group sales | % | 2.9 | 2.6 | 2.9 |
| EBITDA | EUR million | 3.3 | 5.2 | 3.5 |
| EBIT before restructuring | EUR million | 2.2 | 3.9 | 2.4 |
| EBIT after restructuring | EUR million | -1.7 | 3.9 | 2.4 |
| Net profit | EUR million | -19.3 | 15.0 | 4.2 |
"Other business units" principally encompass the non-automotive business of the Group, POLYTEC Holding AG, as well as consolidation effects on results which cannot be attributed to any division in particular.
The negative result mainly relates to costs in connection with the divestment of the PEGUFORM GROUP in the amount of EUR 3.1 million.
| Unit | Dec. 31, 2009 |
Dec. 31, 2008 |
Dec. 31, 2007 |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Asset ratio (Long term assets/ Total balance sheet) |
% | 39.3 | 51.5 | 32.7 |
| Equity ratio (Equity/ Total balance sheet) |
% | 18.5 | 15.2 | 35.7 |
| Balance sheet total | EUR million | 332.1 | 1,020.8 | 445.0 |
| Net working capital | EUR million | 26.0 | 17.9 | 77.3 |
| Net working capital in % of sales (NWC/sales) |
% | 4.3 | 4.4 | 8.9 |
The intensity of investment was considerably reduced in the year under review compared to the previous year due to the divestment of the PEGUFORM GROUP. Capital expenditures for tangible assets dropped by 47.2% to EUR 20.6 million in the reporting year and were mainly attributable to customer-related investments in the purchase of facilities for new up-coming projects.
The increase in the equity ratio from 15.2% to 18.5% despite the current deficit situation is attributable to debt relief but also a decline in balance sheet total in connection with the divestment of the PEGUFORM GROUP.
Balance sheet structure of POLYTEC GROUP Fixed assets Current assets Short-term liabilities Long-term liabilities Equity 2007 2008 56% 2009 65% 46% 44% 35% 54% 2007 2008 16% 66% 2009 22% 42% 13% 72% 18% 36% 15%
| Unit | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net debt | EUR million | 69.9 | 346.4 | 29.2 |
| Net debt to EBITDA | x | 6.9 | 5.33 | 0.46 |
| Gearing debt (net debt/equity) | x | 1.14 | 2.24 | 0.18 |
The substantial reduction in the POLYTEC GROUP's net debt is attributable to debt relief in connection with the divestment of the PEGUFORM GROUP.
Cash flow from continuing operations
| Unit | 2009 | 2008 comparable |
2007 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cash flow from operating activities | EUR million | 10.7 | 70.1 | -7.5 |
| Cash flow from investing activities | EUR million | -18.0 | -238.3 | -9.7 |
| Cash flow from financing activities | EUR million | 19.9 | 163.8 | 23.6 |
| Changes in cash and cash equivalents |
EUR million | 12.6 | -4.4 | 6.4 |
In the year under review, cash flow from operating activities amounted to EUR 10.7 million and was marked by a decline in earnings due to the crisis-fuelled drop in sales and extraordinary expenses in connection with the Group's restructuring measures.
At the same time, working capital management measures led to positive effects. As mentioned above, investments were mainly concentrated on customer-related and efficiencyenhancing projects.
The positive cash inflow from financing activities totalling EUR 19.9 million mainly resulted from additional funding made available by the POLYTEC GROUP's principal lending bank in the course of the restructuring process.
Practical environmental protection involves more than compliance with regulatory obligations. Many organisations do more than is legally required and voluntarily introduce an environmental management system with the aim of continuously improving their environmental performance and reducing the negative impact of their operations on the environment. ISO 14001 is the internationally recognized standard for putting in place an environmental management system. All the group's major sites have received certification in accordance with this standard.
Dealing carefully and responsibly with natural resources is an essential part of the POLYTEC GROUP's business activities. For a company specialising in processing plastics, the avoidance of waste is particularly important. In those factories, which work mainly with injection moulding technologies, every effort is made to regranulate the waste material and channel it back into the production process. The Group also focuses on increasing the use of natural materials.
The economic (sparing) use of raw materials or the use of alternative materials is also an integral aspect of all research and development activities.
EMPEFLEX is a flax fibre-reinforced polypropylene for interior trims, which in addition to its low specific weight offers several other functional advantages. The material is very stiff and highly impact resistant, properties that are reflected in its excellent crash performance. Furthermore, EMPEFLEX components can be laminated with decorative materials without the application of adhesive, which increases economic efficiency and reduces emissions, while at the same time enabling entire composite systems with thermoplastic surface materials to be recycled. EMPEFLEX is derived from the flax plant, which needs very little fertiliser or pesticides, making even the production of this renewable resource extremely environmentally friendly. As flax is an annual plant it also closes the CO2 cycle. At the end of the vehicle's life EMPEFLEX can be recovered from the car body and either reused or recycled as an energy source.
We continue to produce the following technologies that make a positive contribution to reducing emissions:
A further development is the use of sugar cane resin as a matrix material for long fibre-reinforced interior trim parts. Car interior trim parts produced in this manner contain up to 100% renewable raw materials. The process has, however, not yet been used in series production.
The average number of those employed1) by the POLYTEC GROUP and their geographic spread in the years from 2007 to 2009 is as follows:
| 2009 | 2008 comparable |
2008 | 2007 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Austria | 382 | 424 | 424 | 363 |
| Germany | 3,644 | 4,028 | 4,831 | 4,072 |
| Rest of Europe | 1,341 | 1,827 | 2,208 | 1,716 |
| North America | 15 | 17 | 17 | 25 |
| South America | 0 | 0 | 281 | 0 |
| South Africa | 76 | 83 | 83 | 102 |
| Asia | 67 | 160 | 252 | 154 |
| Total | 5,525 | 6,539 | 8,095 | 6,432 |
The average number of employees by division can be broken down as follows:
| 2009 | 2008 comparable |
2008 | 2007 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Automotive Systems Division | 2,908 | 3,056 | 4,930 | 3,321 |
| Automotive Composites Division | 1,867 | 2,686 | 2,368 | 2,380 |
| Car Styling Division | 610 | 647 | 647 | 591 |
| Holding/other segments | 140 | 150 | 150 | 140 |
| Total | 5,525 | 6,539 | 8,095 | 6,432 |
A key performance indicator in the HR area, sales per employee, developed as follows:
| Unit | 2009 | 2008 comparable |
2008 | 2007 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sales per employee | TEUR | 110 | 117 | 134 | 103 |
1) Contract workers/Employees of companies included in the consolidated financial statements for the first time are shown in the table on a pro rata temporis basis from the date of initial consolidation.
A strong customer focus and ongoing process optimisation in terms of profitability, environmentally-friendliness and efficiency are top priorities for the POLYTEC GROUP. Besides, these factors also define the attitude of POLYTEC employees to their work.
In order to be well equipped to face up to the dynamic market challenges that lie ahead, the POLYTEC GROUP promotes the further education and professional training of its employees, both through in-house educational and vocational training measures as well as with the support of external educational institutions. Alongside the further development of technical know-how and manual skills, a strong focus is placed on teaching foreign languages, as these are essential for the business success of an international company such as POLYTEC.
Executive remuneration packages include a performancebased component to promote identification with the company and the careful and efficient use of financial resources.
The election and re-election of members of the Supervisory Board took place at an extraordinary General Meeting on February 5, 2010. With the exception of Andreas Szigmund, who resigned at this meeting, all members of the Supervisory Board were re-elected. Reinhard Schwendtbauer and Meinhard Lukas were elected as new members of the Supervisory Board. For more detailed information regarding the members of the Supervisory Board please refer to the Corporate Governance Report.
Please refer to section E. 2 of the Notes to the Consolidated Accounts for more information about events and transactions after the balance sheet date, which are of material importance for the evaluation of assets and liabilities.
As mentioned above, our customers were unable to buck the downward market trend in 2009. For the 2010 business year, market sentiment is expected to improve and premium car manufacturers in particular are more optimistic, anticipating slight increases compared to the previous year. Thus, our most important customers have reiterated their growth targets over the mid term and expect the automotive industry to resume its upward trend going forward.
In the commercial vehicle segment, manufacturers expect a slight increase for the full-year 2010 despite the persistently uncertain market situation. The reason for this assumption is that the industry has reduced its stocks of commercial vehicles in 2009. The resulting increase in production is also confirmed by the lower number of planned "down" days compared to the previous year. Furthermore, it is expected that this moderate market recovery will gather momentum in the second half of 2010. However, no perceptible improvement of the general situation is anticipated before 2011 a nd 2012. For the 2012 business year, the expectations of most commercial vehicle OEMs are high, especially if today's heavy good vehicles are replaced by the new generation of commercial vehicles with EURO-5 and EURO-6 engines. Nevertheless, production figures are not expected to match the peak levels of the 2007 and 2008 boom years.
For the full-year 2010, sales are expected to show a slight increase. Due to the clear positioning of this division as a supplier of the European premium segment, no negative effects are anticipated from the termination of various European scrappage schemes.
Besides, in the light of the expected positive sales development and the further implementation of optimization measures, the division's operating income is anticipated to increase in the 2010 business year.
Against the backdrop of the current general market development, there are few signs at present of a long-term recovery of the Automotive Composites Division, despite a slight increase at the beginning of 2010. However, based on the implementation of sales and cost optimization measures which will become fully effective in 2010, the situation has already been improved.
In the event that capacity utilization does not show a further improvement in the course of 2010, the company does not rule out the possibility of putting in place additional restructuring measures upon termination of short-time working schemes.
In the wake of the global financial crisis, in autumn 2008 the POLYTEC GROUP ran into severe financial difficulties following a significant rise in the level of indebtedness for the acquisition of the PEGUFORM GROUP, which might have jeopardized the survival of the company. In spring 2009, a comprehensive restructuring programme was negotiated with the lending banks of the POLYTEC GROUP, which led to the divestment of the PEGUFORM GROUP and resulted in the sustainable reduction of the company's debt level. This programme was successfully finalized in summer 2009. Following the reduction of the POLYTEC GROUP's indebtedness and the guaranteed continuation of the parent company's operations, the main lending bank of the Group made additional funds available in the amount of EUR 31 million with a view to meeting future liquidity requirements for the further development of business.
The persisting global financial and economic crisis and the severe slowdown in economic activity posed a huge challenge to POLYTEC Holding AG. The Group's business performance in the year under review was marked by a massive slump in both the passenger car and commercial vehicle segments, which led to considerable declines in sales and earnings. In the year under review, the POLYTEC GROUP posted a negative result after taxes of EUR -90.1 million, including effects from business divisions "held for sale" (for further details about the included one-off expenses please refer to the Notes to the Consolidated Accounts under D. 6 and D. 8).
In light of the current challenging economic situation and the difficulty of predicting the further development of the passenger car and commercial vehicle businesses, the company's future earnings situation and financing requirements might be subject to changes that cannot be estimated with any degree of certainty on the basis of the information currently available. According to current business planning calculations, the POL-YTEC GROUP is expected to post a positive EBIT in 2010 while the company's liquidity projections show that additional cash and cash equivalents in the amount of EUR 18.5 million will be required; this, however, can be covered within the current financial framework. Furthermore, it should be noted that business planning calculations and the resulting liquidity projections also encompass measures which have not yet been fully agreed upon (sales increases, reduction of personnel costs). Therefore, the final outcome of negotiations will have a significant impact on the future earnings situation and financing requirements of both the Group and the individual subsidiaries. The POLYTEC GROUP's business planning calculations have been drawn up by both local management and the Board of Directors to the best of their knowledge and belief on the basis of the information currently available about the development of the passenger car and commercial vehicle segments, which is, however, hard to predict at present. Against the backdrop of widespread uncertainties and negative market sentiment as a result of the global economic downturn, the POLYTEC GROUP cannot fully rule out that the future business development of the Group's subsidiaries might be in jeopardy. It is therefore possible that unfavourable impairments of certain balance sheet assets might be recognized in future. In the first two months of 2010, Group results were slightly behind schedule.
Against this background, additional funding to be provided by the Group's main lending bank is deemed to be vital for the survival of POLYTEC Holding AG. As the company's principal creditor, the lending bank has confirmed in writing as of March 9, 2010 that it intends to guarantee additional funding based on the anticipated development of Group operations in line with the original planning calculations and pending approval by the relevant Committees by December 31, 2011. Deviations from plan of individual companies or plants of POLYTEC Holding AG alone are not considered a sufficient reason to terminate the financing agreement on the part of the lending bank, provided that the general business development of POLYTEC Holding AG does not fall substantially short of the original planning calculations. In the event of further declines in earnings or of a suspension of funding on the part of the lending bank, the survival of the Group would be in jeopardy.
However, based on the current business planning calculations and in light of the additional funding guaranteed by the lending bank, the Board of Directors expects the Group to continue business operations.
For more detailed information about risk reporting please refer to section E.5 of the Notes to the Consolidated Accounts. For information concerning Group derivative financial instruments please refer to section C. 21 of the Notes. Concerning "Continuance of operations" we refer to the chapter "Continuing operations and financing activities".
To secure the Group's future competitiveness and business success, research and development activities focus on continuously improving and streamlining current manufacturing processes, on new and further development of automotive components in consultation and collaboration with our customers, and on the further development of materials.
In the 2009 business year, a number of developments reflecting the latest trends were successfully implemented. These encompassed the use of lightweight components to reduce CO2 emissions, intelligent system integration to increase costefficiency and a new ecological and sustainable product based on the discussions currently underway in the specialist media.
The POLYTEC GROUP operates several development centres. In keeping with the corporate strategy each of these development centres specialises on the products that are manufactured at the respective site. New engine compartment parts are developed in the north German town of Lohne, where the largest production site for engine compartment parts is based. Development work ranges from the introduction of plastic parts as substitutes for aluminium parts to the further development of existing components. The test area has been extended to meet constantly rising customer demands and to support active work on new developments, with a view to further consolidating the company's pioneering role in the field of engine component parts.
The development focus in the Bavarian town of Geretsried is on interior systems. Employees here work constantly on the further development of materials, concentrating on weight reduction, cost efficiency and component quality. In the field of material development, the clear focus is on developing sandwich materials and environmentally friendly materials based on natural fibres. Development work in the field of manufacturing concentrates, above all, on improving the integrated module concept in order to further reduce assembly costs.
In the 2009 business year, we started series production of a door trim panel based on an innovative laminating solution to achieve high product quality and weight-reduced components at a lower cost.
Further research activities, which focus on basic topics such as the use of resins based on renewable raw materials and also on the further development of natural fibre production in general (development project in cooperation with the Chemnitz University of Technology to study the use of green flax instead of the well-rotted flax used hitherto etc.), round-off the company's development portfolio.
In the town of Morsbach-Lichtenberg in North Rhine-Westphalia, development work concentrates on the field of pillar trims, in particular on back injection moulding of textiles and other materials. The town is also home to the competence centre for the finishing of special textile goods for back injection moulding. The use of thin wall technology in the field of injection moulding is also developed at this centre, as are the plastic door trim panels.
In addition to goal-orientated pre-development projects carried out in close consultation with automotive manufacturers, concerted efforts have also been devoted to developing new component and surfacing materials, as well as process technologies. Thanks to this development work, the Group has already registered several trademarks, e.g. POLYSWIRL (oil separator system), POLYFLAX (natural fibre-based composite), POLYLOAD (a new type of lightweight matrix), POLYSKIN (2-component processes for high-quality interior parts at optimum cost) and POLYGRAIN (in-mould graining process). Further projects are in the pipeline. At present, the POLYTEC GROUP owns more than 240 registered trademarks and patents.
In the Automotive Composites Division the focus is above all on finding new and better applications for thermoset materials. Other development activities are aimed at increasing efficiency in the production and handling of SMC (sheet moulding compounds) as well as enhancing their processing and varnishing safety. The new generation of vehicles is also posing new challenges in terms of component strength and impact resistance, requiring constant development of the basic material and the way in which it is processed. Another key area of development work encompasses the weight reduction of components whilst preserving their main properties.
The business activities of the Car Styling Division offer the full range of the process chain, beginning with first design concepts to clay models (M 1:1), digitalization, CAD construction and the construction of rapid-prototyping-models. In the tool shop and mould construction department we construct and develop tools for serial production as well as devices. These processes will be executed from our highly experienced project managers in close relationship with our customers. The process chain ranges from the plastic parts production, the pretreatment to the prime coating, painting, assembling and logistics. This enables us to react highly flexible and to steadily improve the competence.
In 2009, the POLYTEC GROUP spent approximately 2.7% of total Group sales on research and development (2008: 2.6%).
The Board of Directors is responsible for implementing an adequate internal control and risk management system for the accounting process and financial reporting. Appropriate organisational measures ensure that all relevant legal requirements to make complete, correct, timely and orderly entries in the books and other records are met.
The entire process from procurement to payment is subject to strict rules and guidelines that are intended to avoid any risks these processes may entail. These measures and rules include separation of functions, signature authorisation policies, and signatory powers for authorising payments applying on a collective basis only and restricted to a small number of employees, as well as system-supported checks by the software in use.
By using a standardized, Group-wide financial reporting system, together with ad hoc reporting on major events, the Board of Directors is kept constantly abreast of all relevant issues. The Supervisory Board is informed in Supervisory Board meetings, held at least once every quarter, on the current business development, including operative planning and the medium-term strategy of the Group, with direct and immediate information being provided to the Supervisory Board in special cases. Internal control and risk management are among the topics dealt with at the Audit Committee meetings.
The share capital of POLYTECH Holding AG is split into 22,329,585 bearer shares with a par value of EUR 1.00 each. The Group has no other types of shares. All shares have been admitted to trading in the prime market segment of the Vienna Stock Exchange.
In January 2006, POLYTEC Holding AG acquired 29,934 treasury shares (0.13% of the share capital) for a purchasing price of EUR 7.20 per share (following prior approval of the Annual General Meeting on October 27, 2004) from a retired member of the Group's management. The number of treasury shares held by the company has remained unchanged since then.
Shareholders with a stake of over 10.0% of the share capital as of the balance sheet date and at the time of the compilation of this report included:
IMC Verwaltungsgesellschaft mbH: This company holds shares in POLYTEC Holding AG on its own behalf, but also on behalf of the affiliated companies Huemer Holding GmbH and Huemer Invest GmbH.
The total shareholding of the three companies amounts to roughly 32% of the share capital2). The CEO of the POLYTEC GROUP, Friedrich Huemer, is the indirect sole shareholder of IMC Verwaltungsgesellschaft mbH and the managing director with sole power of representation of the said companies.
Due to the necessity of acquiring a working capital line of credit to provide additional funding to the POLYTEC GROUP in the amount of roughly EUR 31 million, the title of property for 16% of the company's share capital or 3,572,734 shares was assigned by HUEMER Holding GmbH, an affiliated company of IMC Verwaltungsgesellschaft mbH, to the lawyer Dr. Peter Posch. In the exercise of his voting rights Mr. Posch is only bound to HUEMER Holding GmbH with regard to a small number of important measures.
PT Automotive Consulting GmbH: This company, based in Linz (Austria), belongs to the affiliated Group of Raiffeisenlandesbank Oberösterreich AG and holds approximately 19% of the company's shares.
Delta Lloyd Asset Management NV: This asset management firm is based in Amsterdam (Netherlands) and holds approximately 10% of the share capital of POLYTEC Holding AG through the following funds:
– Delta Lloyd Europees Deelnemingen Fonds
– Delta Lloyd Luxembourg European Participation Fund
No shareholders have particular rights of control.
With regard to the Board of Directors' ability to issue shares, please refer to the Notes to the Consolidated Accounts under D. 22 for more detailed information about the authorized capital.
There are indemnification agreements between the company and two members of the Board of Directors. There are no indemnification agreements between the company and its Supervisory Board members and employees, nor any other major agreements, which would be affected by a change in control or a public takeover bid.
No provisions in the Articles of Association are laid down that go beyond the statutory provisions for appointing members of the Board of Directors or of the Supervisory Board or for amending the Articles of Association.
Hörsching, April 6, 2010
The Board of Directors
| Friedrich Huemer m.p. | Eduard Schreiner m.p. |
|---|---|
Alfred Kollros m.p. Andreas Jagl m.p.
2) Including the 16% of the share capital assigned as security.
| Consolidated Acc ounts |
61 |
|---|---|
| Consolidated income statement |
62 |
| Consolidated balance sheet |
62 |
| Consolidated cash flow statement |
63 |
| Statement of changes in consolidated shareholders' equity |
64 |
| Statement of changes in equity |
65 |
| General information |
66 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Principles of consolidation |
67 | |||
| Accounting and evaluation principles |
70 | |||
| Information concerning the Group's profit and loss statement and the consolidated balance sheet |
74 | |||
| Other information |
83 | |||
| Reporting by business segment |
90 | |||
| Consolidated movement of fixed assets |
92 | |||
| Changes in provisions for severance payments, pensions and jubilee payments |
94 | |||
| Schedule of Group investments |
95 | |||
| Statement of all Legal Representatives | 96 | |||
| Independent Auditors' Report 97 |
compared with the figures from the previous year
| in TEUR | Notes | 2009 | 2008 adjusted |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1. | Net sales D. 1 |
607,047 | 768,282 |
| 2. | Other operating income D. 2 |
22,439 | 21,663 |
| 3. | Changes in inventory of finished and unfinished goods | -19,728 | 29,321 |
| 4. | Own work capitalized | 823 | 1,329 |
| 5. | Expenses for materials and services received D. 3 |
-330,194 | -437,135 |
| 6. | Personnel expenses D. 4 |
-186,509 | -216,961 |
| 7. | Other operating expenses D. 5 |
-87,091 | -116,314 |
| 8. | Deconsolidation gains B. 1 |
3,434 | 0 |
| 9. | Earnings before interest, taxes and amortization (EBITDA) | 10,221 | 50,184 |
| 10. | Depreciation | -28,671 | -28,139 |
| 11. | Earnings before interest, taxes and amortization of goodwill (EBITA) | -18,450 | 22,046 |
| 12. | Impairments | -3,965 | -8,172 |
| 13. | Operating profit (EBIT) before cost of restructuring | -22,415 | 13,874 |
| 14. | Cost of restructuring D. 7 |
-7,822 | 0 |
| 15. | Operating profit (EBIT) after cost of restructuring | -30,236 | 13,874 |
| 16. | Income from associated companies | 0 | 142 |
| 17. | Financial expenses | -6,884 | -6,158 |
| 18. | Impairments | -9,944 | 0 |
| 19. | Other financial results | -568 | -112 |
| 20. | Financial result D. 8 |
-17,397 | -6,128 |
| 21. | Earnings before tax | -47,633 | 7,746 |
| 22. | Taxes on income D. 9 |
-3,796 | 2,044 |
| 23. | Net profit of continued operations | -51,429 | 9,790 |
| 24. | Net profit of discontinued operations D. 10 |
-38,650 | -7,575 |
| 25. | Consolidated profit for the year | -90,079 | 2,215 |
| thereof result minority | -428 | -372 | |
| thereof result of the holding company | -90,506 | 1,844 | |
| Earnings per share D. 23 |
-4,06 | 0,08 | |
| Earnings per share of continued operations D. 23 |
-2,33 | 0,42 | |
| in TEUR | Group | Minority interests | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Profit after tax | -90,506 | 428 | -90,079 |
| Minority share of results of discontinued operations | 0 | 846 | 846 |
| Currency translations | 585 | -200 | 385 |
| Market valuation of securities available for sale | 9,059 | 0 | 9,059 |
| Total comprehensive income | -80,863 | 1,073 | -79,790 |
| in TEUR | Group | Minority interests | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Profit after tax | 1,844 | 1,152 | 2,995 |
| Currency translations | -3,774 | 472 | -3,302 |
| Market valuation of securities available for sale | -9,080 | 0 | -9,080 |
| Total comprehensive income | -11,011 | 1,624 | -9,387 |
compared with the figures from the previous year
| Assets in TEUR | Notes | Dec. 31, 2009 | Dec. 31, 2008 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A. | Fixed Assets | ||||
| I. | Intangible assets | D. 11 | 1,975 | 20,558 | |
| II. | Goodwill | D. 12 | 19,300 | 19,300 | |
| III. | Tangible assets | D. 13 | 106,176 | 474,439 | |
| IV. | Investments in affiliated companies | 290 | 296 | ||
| V. | Investments in associated companies | 31 | 31 | ||
| VI. | Investment in joint ventures | D. 14 | 0 | 7,414 | |
| VII. | Other financial assets | 2,874 | 3,419 | ||
| VIII. | Deferred tax assets | D. 16 | 13,974 | 22,624 | |
| 144,619 | 548,080 | ||||
| B. | Current assets | ||||
| I. | Inventories | ||||
| 1. Raw materials and supplies |
27,429 | 68,889 | |||
| 2. Unfinished goods and as yet unbillable services minus advance payments |
22,005 | 83,693 | |||
| 3. Finished goods and merchandise |
20,606 | 23,432 | |||
| 4. Advance payments made |
2,932 | 1,829 | |||
| D. 17 | 72,972 | 177,842 | |||
| II. | Trade accounts receivable and other receivables and assets | ||||
| 1. Trade accounts receivable |
54,976 | 146,655 | |||
| 2. Other receivables |
20,526 | 29,416 | |||
| 3. Income tax receivables |
1,200 | 11,260 | |||
| D. 18 | 76,702 | 187,331 | |||
| III. | Marketable securities | D. 19 | 5,932 | 6,796 | |
| IV. | Cash and cash equivalents | D. 20 | 31,857 | 100,768 | |
| 332,081 | 1,020,816 |
| Equity and liabilities in TEUR | Dec. 31, 2009 | Dec. 31, 2008 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A. | Shareholders' equity | ||||
| I. | Share capital | 22,330 | 22,330 | ||
| II. | Capital reserves | 37,563 | 37,563 | ||
| III. | Treasury stock | -216 | -216 | ||
| IV. | Minority interests | 3,406 | 15,566 | ||
| V. | Retained earnings | -1,601 | 79,549 | ||
| D. 22 | 61,483 | 154,792 | |||
| B. | Long-term liabilities | ||||
| I. | Interest-bearing liabilities | D. 24 | 12,589 | 72,063 | |
| II. | Provision for deferred taxes | D. 16 | 5,098 | 28,218 | |
| III. | Long-term provisions for personnel | D. 25 | 25,661 | 28,264 | |
| IV. | Other long-term liabilities | D. 26 | 5,800 | 5,746 | |
| 49,147 | 134,292 | ||||
| C. | Short-term liabilities | ||||
| I. | Trade accounts payable | D. 27 | 59,642 | 155,678 | |
| II. | Short-term interest-bearing liabilities | D. 28 | 51,801 | 330,341 | |
| III. | Short-term portion of long-term loans | D. 29 | 45,276 | 54,092 | |
| IV. | Liabilities on income taxes | D. 30 | 2,202 | 2,466 | |
| V. | Other short-term liabilities | D. 31 | 62,530 | 189,157 | |
| 221,451 | 731,733 | ||||
| 332,081 | 1,020,816 |
| in TEUR | 2009 | 2008 adjusted | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings before tax | -47,633 | 7,746 | |
| – | Income taxes | 3,993 | 2,778 |
| + | Depreciation (appreciation) of fixed assets | 32,646 | 37,310 |
| + | Non-cash expenditures from securities held for sale | 9,944 | 0 |
| +(–) | Increase (decrease) in long-term provisions | 1,108 | -767 |
| –(+) | Profit (loss) from asset disposals | -180 | -48 |
| = | Consolidated cash flow from earnings | -123 | 47,019 |
| –(+) | Increase (decrease) in inventories, advance payments made | 13,552 | 7,444 |
| –(+) | Increase (decrease) in trade and other receivables | 2,983 | 55,946 |
| +(–) | Increase (decrease) in trade and other payables | 10,892 | -7,126 |
| +(–) | Increase (decrease) in short-term provisions | -16,577 | -33,214 |
| = | Consolidated cash flow from operating activities | 10,728 | 70,069 |
| in TEUR | 2009 | 2008 adjusted | |
|---|---|---|---|
| – | Investments in fixed assets | -20,569 | -39,025 |
| – | Acquisition of consolidated subsidiaries (purchase price less the acquired cash and cash equivalents) | 0 | -192,432 |
| – | Acquisition of subsidiaries | -48 | 0 |
| + | Disposal of deconsolidated subsidiaries | 25 | 0 |
| – | Purchase of marketable securities | 0 | -10,979 |
| +(–) | Profit (loss) from asset disposals | 180 | 48 |
| + | Book value of asset disposals | 2,441 | 4,094 |
| = | Consolidated cash flow from investing activities | -17,970 | -238,294 |
| in TEUR | 2009 | 2008 adjusted | |
|---|---|---|---|
| +(–) | Increase (decrease) in interest-bearing loans and liabilities to banks | 19,323 | 172,325 |
| +(–) | Grant of long-term loans (less repayment) | 483 | -233 |
| – | Dividends | 0 | -6,690 |
| +(–) | Other changes in equity | 98 | -1,566 |
| = | Consolidated cash flow from financing activities | 19,904 | 163,836 |
| in TEUR | 2009 | 2008 adjusted | |
|---|---|---|---|
| +(–) | Consolidated cash flow from operating activities | 10,728 | 70,069 |
| +(–) | Consolidated cash flow from investing activities | -17,970 | -238,294 |
| +(–) | Consolidated cash flow from financing activities | 19,904 | 163,836 |
| = | Changes in cash and cash equivalents | 12,662 | -4,389 |
| + | Opening balance of cash and cash equivalents | 19,195 | 23,584 |
| = | Closing balance of cash and cash equivalents | 31,857 | 19,195 |
| in TEUR | 2009 | 2008 adjusted | |
|---|---|---|---|
| +(–) | Consolidated cash flow from operating activities | -11,371 | 21,703 |
| +(–) | Consolidated cash flow from investing activities | -10,713 | -7,473 |
| +(–) | Consolidated cash flow from financing activities | -1,087 | 41,677 |
| = | Consolidated cash flow from discontinued operations | -23,170 | 55,908 |
| + | Opening balance of cash and cash equivalents of discontinued operations | 81,574 | 25,666 |
| – | Outflow of cash and cash equivalents from deconsolidation | -58,404 | 0 |
| = | Closing balance of cash and cash equivalents from discontinued operations | 0 | 81,574 |
| in TEUR | 2009 | 2008 adjusted |
|---|---|---|
| Closing balance of cash and cash equivalents of continued operations | 31,857 | 19,195 |
| Closing balance of cash and cash equivalents of discontinued operations | 0 | 81,574 |
| Closing balance of cash and cash equivalents | 31,857 | 100,768 |
| in TEUR | Share capital | Capital reserves | Treasury stock | Minority interests | Retained earnings | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Balance as of Jan. 1, 2009 | 22,330 | 37,563 | -216 | 15,566 | 79,549 | 154,792 |
| Total comprehensive income after tax | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1,073 | -80,863 | -79,790 |
| Dividends | 0 | 0 | 0 | -2,414 | 0 | -2,414 |
| Endconsolidation of minorities | 0 | 0 | 0 | -10,819 | 0 | -10,819 |
| Other changes | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | -287 | -287 |
| Balance as of Dec. 31, 2009 | 22,330 | 37,563 | -216 | 3,406 | -1,601 | 61,483 |
| in TEUR | Share capital | Capital reserves | Treasury stock | Minority interests | Retained earnings | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Balance as of Jan. 1, 2008 | 22,330 | 57,784 | -216 | 692 | 78,328 | 158,918 |
| Total comprehensive income after tax | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1,624 | -11,011 | -9,387 |
| Dividends | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | -6,690 | -6,690 |
| Firstconsolidation of minorities | 0 | 0 | 0 | 13,250 | -2,064 | 11,187 |
| Capital reserves | 0 | -20,220 | 0 | 0 | 20,220 | 0 |
| Other changes | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 765 | 765 |
| Balance as of Dec. 31, 2008 | 22,330 | 37,563 | -216 | 15,566 | 79,549 | 154,792 |
The POLYTEC GROUP is a globally operating concern focusing on the plastics industry with its head office in Austria. In the automotive industry, the group is working as supplier of interior and engine compartment components (Automotive Systems Division) as well as a supplier of original equipment and components for small series (Car Styling Division). The Automotive Composites Division functions as supplier for the automotive and industrial vehicle industry. Furthermore, the Group produces PU plastic parts as well as machines for their production for other industries.
The consolidated accounts for the financial year 2009 of the POLYTEC Holding AG (hereinafter referred to as "Group" or "POLYTEC GROUP") were prepared in accordance with the guidelines of the International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) and their interpretations in line with the EU standard practice.
The headquarters of the POLYTEC Holding AG is located in Hörsching, Austria and is listed in the commercial register of the Landesgericht Linz [Commercial Registry of the regional court of Linz] under the number FN 197646 g.
All standards, which had to be mandatorily applied for the financial years, were applied with regard to the preparation of the present consolidated accounts. Already published standards and standards applied by the EU or interpretations which did not have to be mandatorily applied were not prematurely applied.
The (revised) standard IAS 23 "Borrowing Costs" – under which borrowing costs, which are directly attributable to the acquisition, construction or production of a qualifying asset, form part of the cost of that asset and must be capitalized – was adopted by the European Union in December 2008. The PO-LYTEC GROUP is applying the new standard from the financial year commencing on January 1, 2009. To date, the revision of the standard has had no impact on the consolidated financial statements of the POLYTEC GROUP.
The Group is also applying the standard IAS 1 "Presentation of Financial Statements" from the financial year commencing on January 1, 2009.
Application of the following standards published by the IASB is not yet mandatory and they have not been applied by the POLYTEC GROUP to date either:
| Standard/Interpretation | Title | Applicable for the first time for financial years commencing on or after: |
|---|---|---|
| IFRS 3 (revised) | Business Combinations | Jul. 1, 2009 |
| IAS 27 (revised) | Consolidated and Separate Financial Statements (IFRS) |
Jul. 1, 2009 |
Together, the revised standards IFRS 3 and IAS 27 form the definitive regulations for accounting for business combinations, consolidated financial statements and minority interests. In particular, greater importance will be accorded to the fair value measurement in future.
With regard to the changes in IFRS 3 (revised) and IAS 27 (revised) together with subsequent changes in other standards, it must be noted that the resulting repercussions on future transactions are currently being evaluated.
In the face of the forthcoming use of not yet effective and by POLYTEC so far not applied standards or interpretations, no material modifications of balanced assets, liabilities or other information are expected in the consolidated accounts.
The consolidated accounts have been prepared in thousand Euro (TEUR). Calculation differences related to rounding may occur when summing up rounded amounts and percentages due to the use of automated calculating machines.
The income statement of the Group is prepared in accordance with the total cost accounting method.
According to Article 245a UGB [Austrian Business Code], the present consolidated accounts replace the consolidated accounts, which would otherwise have to be prepared in accordance with Articles 244 ff UGB.
The basis of consolidation is determined in accordance with the principles of the IAS 27 (Consolidated and Separate Financial Statements and Accounting for Investments in Subsidiaries) in connection with SIC – 12 (Consolidation – Special Purpose Entities). The parent company is the POLYTEC Holding AG, Hörsching. The consolidated accounts include all companies by full consolidation, which are influenced by the parent company. Thus, four national subsidiaries (previous year: five) and 23 international subsidiaries (previous year: 38) were included in addition to the parent company; these subsidiaries are under the legal and factual control of the POLYTEC GROUP. Ten companies (previous year: 13), which were not included, are not important for the consolidated accounts. The balance sheet date for all companies included in the consolidated accounts is December 31, 2009.
Special purpose entities are included in the consolidated accounts provided that they are under the controlling influence of the POLYTEC GROUP. Special purpose entities are legal entities that are created to fulfil narrow and specific objectives.
An overview of the fully consolidated companies can be found in annex 5 to the notes on the consolidated accounts.
The annual accounts of subsidiaries are included into the consolidated accounts from the time of acquisition until the time of disposal. A subsidiary will first be included when the respective parent company is actually assigned the control with regard to the assets and the business activities of this company.
A joint venture is a contractual arrangement, whereby two or more parties undertake an economic activity that is subject to joint control. Investments are reported in the balance sheet pursuant to IAS 31 by applying the equity method of accounting. Investments are included for the first time in the consolidated accounts at the acquisition costs. Subsequently, the carrying amount of the investment is reduced or increased in line with the results of the associated company. The Group's share of the results of the associated company is recorded in the income statement at the time of the acquisition.
Two joint ventures Celulosa Fabril (CEFA) S.A. in Sant Esteve (Spain) as well as SPPM Sociedale Portuguesa de Pintura e Modulos S.A. in Palmela (Portugal), which were included in the consolidated financial statements of POLYTEC GROUP as of October 1, 2008, were also retired following the deconsolidation of the Peguform Group.
In the financial year, the basis of consolidation is changed as follows:
| Basis of consolidation | Full consolidation | Consolidation at equity |
|---|---|---|
| As of Dec. 31, 2009 | 44 | 2 |
| Retirement due to company divestments | -14 | -2 |
| Retirement due to closure | -1 | 0 |
| Retirement due to Group-internal reorganization | -1 | 0 |
| Company acquisitions | 0 | 0 |
| New companies | 0 | 0 |
| As of Dec. 31, 2009 | 28 | 0 |
| thereof foreign companies | 23 | 0 |
The following companies were deconsolidated in the financial year under review for the first time:
| Company | Share on equity | Date of deconsolidation |
|---|---|---|
| PF-Beteiligungs GmbH, Hörsching (new company) |
100% | Jul. 1, 2009 |
| POLYTEC Composites Sweden AB, Ljungby, Sweden |
100% | Dec. 31, 2009 |
| PEGUFORM GROUP consisting of: | ||
| Peguform Luxembourg Holding S.a.r.l., Luxemburg |
100% | Jul. 1, 2009 |
| Peguform Luxembourg S.a.r.l., Luxemburg | 100% | Jul. 1, 2009 |
| Peguform Netherlands B.V., Baarn, Netherlands | 100% | Jul. 1, 2009 |
| Peguform GmbH, Bötzingen, Germany | 100% | Jul. 1, 2009 |
| Peguform Iberica S.L., Polinya, Spain | 100% | Jul. 1, 2009 |
| Peguform de Teruel S.L., Fuentes Claras, Spain | 100% | Jul. 1, 2009 |
| Peguform Module Division Iberica Front Ends S.L., Sant Esteve, Spain |
100% | Jul. 1, 2009 |
| Peguform Module Division Iberica Cockpits S.L., Martorell, Spain |
100% | Jul. 1, 2009 |
| Peguform do Brasil, Ltda., Pinhais, Brazil | 100% | Jul. 1, 2009 |
| Peguform Mexico S.A. de C.V., Puebla Pue, Mexico |
100% | Jul. 1, 2009 |
| Shock Absorb de Mexico S.A. de C.V., Puebla Pue, Mexico |
100% | Jul. 1, 2009 |
| Fabrica de Parachoques de Mexico S.A. de C.V., Puebla Pue, Mexico |
100% | Jul. 1, 2009 |
| Peguform Portugal S.A., Lisboa, Portugal | 100% | Jul. 1, 2009 |
| Changchun Peguform Automotive Plastics Technology Co. Ltd., Changchun, China |
50% | Jul. 1, 2009 |
The financial crisis, which started in 2008, on the one hand, and the massive slump in economic activity in the automotive and commercial vehicle sector, on the other hand, also had a considerable impact on the commercial and financial position of the POLYTEC GROUP. This resulted in commercial setbacks, which also continued in the first half of 2009. This combined with a substantial increase in the Group's debt because of the acquisition of Peguform, led to the urgent necessity of refinancing the short-term borrowings incurred for the acquisition of Peguform, which would have been due in the second and third quarter of 2009. At the same time, additional liquidity had to be secured to keep operations running.
Following an in-depth analysis of the Group, which was carried out with the help of external experts at the request of the financing banks up to and including April 2009, a compromise was found in May 2009 after intensive but constructive negotiations, which should help ensure the survival of the POLYTEC GROUP.
The restructuring of the POLYTEC GROUP agreed between companies, key shareholders and banks envisages the following key points:
In the course of the assignment of the Peguform Group, 50% of the claims from a possible reduction of the Peguform Group's purchase price, which was paid by POLYTEC Holding AG and other companies in the POLYTEC GROUP on acquisition of the Peguform Group, were also assigned to the banks, which financed the acquisition of the Peguform Group. Arbitration proceedings are currently pending with regard to this possible reduction in the purchase price. Because the arbitration proceedings are still at any early stage, the outcome of these proceedings is still uncertain.
The two Peguform sites (Weiden and Chodová Planá), which are attributable to the Automotive Composites Division, will remain with the POLYTEC Group.
The divestment of the Peguform Group was approved by resolution of the Annual General Meeting on June 26, 2009. Deconsolidation took place on July 1, 2009. Following authorization without any conditions by the responsible competition authorities, the transaction was completed on August 5, 2009.
On the basis of the decision to dispose of the Peguform Group, this division was qualified as "held for sale" in accordance with IFRS 5 from the beginning of the first quarter of 2009 and reported separately accordingly. The change related solely to POLYTEC's Automotive Systems Division, since those areas of Peguform that are attributable to the Automotive Composites Division will remain with POLYTEC.
The result of the "held for sale" divisions was reported separately in the income statement; the figures for the previous year were adjusted accordingly.
The deconsolidation gain contained in the result from divisions "held for sale" was calculated by comparing the net worth of the Peguform Group being divested, allowing for minority interests, with the sales proceeds. The sales proceeds were established, as described above, from the waiver or assumption of debt amounting to EUR 169.5 million plus interest of EUR 4.8 million.
| in TEUR | |
|---|---|
| Sales proceeds | 174,349 |
| Net worth of the Peguform Group as of Jul. 1, 2009 | -169,418 |
| Minority interests in the net worth | 10,819 |
| Deconsolidation gain | 15,751 |
The net worth being invested in the course of the deconsolidation of the Peguform group is as follows:
| in TEUR | |
|---|---|
| Non-current assets | 345,177 |
| Current assets | 297,434 |
| Non-current provisions and liabilities | -23,217 |
| Current provisions and liabilities | -449,976 |
| Net worth of the Peguform Group as of Jul. 1, 2009 | 169,418 |
In the business year under review, PF-Beteiligungs GmbH, which had been set up as a special purpose entity as defined in SIC 12 in connection with the acquisition of shares in the Peguform Group, was deconsolidated in the course of the sale of the Peguform Group because it was now of minor significance for the consolidated financial statements. The company held 10.2% of Peguform Luxembourg Holding S.a.r.l.
After Composites Sweden AB, Ljungby, filed for insolvency on January 14, 2010 (please refer to the Events after the Balance Sheet Date), POLYTEC GROUP lost control over the company. The deconsolidation of POLYTEC Composites Sweden AB, Ljungby, took place already on December 31, 2009 by taking into account the principle of materiality and profitability.
The contribution of POLYTEC Composites Sweden AB, Ljungby, to the values shown in the income statement is as follows:
| in TEUR | |
|---|---|
| Net sales | 10,998 |
| Net loss | -3,401 |
The deconsolidation gain in the amount of TEUR 3.434 results from the negative net assets of POLYTEC Composites Sweden AB, Ljungby, as of December 31, 2009 in the amount of TEUR 3.434. No profit from disposal.
The basis of consolidation has also shrunk by one further company, since LLW Lohner Lackierwerk GmbH has been merged with Polytec Riesselmann GmbH & Co KG. This did not involve the disposal of any assets from the Group.
The consolidation of investments for acquisitions until March 31, 2004 was performed on the basis of the book value method by offsetting the acquisition costs of the investments against the equity ratio allotted to these investments at the time of acquisition. A goodwill will be assigned to the assets as far as possible. A badwill was analyzed in previous years for its reason of accrual and, if affecting future losses and expenses, recorded in accordance with IAS 22 as income at the time of occurrence of these losses and expenses.
IFRS 3 "Business Combinations" was applied for income occurred after March 31, 2004. Thus, the consolidation of investments was performed on the basis of the revaluation method (method concerning all assets and liabilities at fair value, also in the case of minorities and complete disclosure of the hidden reserves, independent from the amount of the minority interests). The investment book value is opposed by the proportionate, re-evaluated equity of the subsidiary (purchase accounting).
Remaining differences will be capitalized as goodwill. Goodwill occurred prior to January 1, 2005 were recorded with the book value of December 31, 2004 and are subject to an annual impairment test.
If the acquisition costs are lower than the net assets, the difference (negative consolidation difference) will be recognized in the income statement of the acquisition period.
Further information with regard to the effects of the deconsolidation carried out in the year 2009 can be found in section B. 1.
Minority interests in the equity and in the result of the companies controlled by the parent company are disclosed in the consolidated financial statements under equity in accordance with IAS 27.
All accounts receivable and payable as well as expenses and revenues resulting from transactions between the consolidated companies were eliminated by taking into account the principle of materiality. Intermediate results from Group-internal deliveries were also eliminated as far as they are material.
All transactions in foreign currencies were valued at the exchange rate of the transaction date in the individual companies. Monetary assets and liabilities in foreign currencies are converted at the exchange rate on the balance sheet date. Resulting exchange rate differences are recorded in the income statement of the Group.
The functional currency of non-euro subsidiaries is the corresponding national currency; however, this does not apply for the Turkish company whose functional currency is the euro. Assets and liabilities of international subsidiaries were converted with the reference exchange rate of the European Central Bank on the balance sheet date. Positions of the income statement of the Group were converted with average exchange rates of the financial year.
Exchange rate differences of monetary positions, which, from the economic point of view, belong to a foreign company like, for example, long-term debts and loans will be accounted with the Group equity capital and will be recorded under the position "Differences from currency translation".
The following currency exchange rates were used:
| Average exchange rate | Exchange rate on balance sheet date |
|||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2009 | 2008 | Dec. 31, 2009 | Dec. 31, 2008 | |
| CAD | 1.5808 | 1.5657 | 1.5128 | 1.6998 |
| GBP | 0.8894 | 0.8026 | 0.8881 | 0.9525 |
| PLN | 4.3365 | 3.5273 | 4.1045 | 4.1528 |
| SEK | 10.5820 | 9.6805 | 10.2520 | 10.8696 |
| SKK | 1.0000 | 31.1526 | 1.0000 | 30.1205 |
| USD | 1.3922 | 1.4725 | 1.4406 | 1.3918 |
| ZAR | 11.4679 | 12.0919 | 10.6660 | 13.0719 |
| CNY | n/a | 8.9767 | n/a | 9.4967 |
| CZK | 26.4550 | 25.4453 | 26.4730 | 26.8817 |
| BRL | n/a | 2.9682 | n/a | 3.2436 |
| MXN | n/a | 17.4520 | n/a | 19.2308 |
The principle of standardized accounting and evaluation will be applied due to the guidelines applicable throughout the entire Group. Insubstantial deviations with regard to the individual financial statements of international allied companies were retained.
Intangible assets are evaluated with their acquisition costs and amortized according to schedule on a straight-line basis. The amortization rates are between 10.0% and 66.7%.
Expenses for research are shown as expenses in the year of their occurrence. Development costs are normally also periodically occurring expenses. They have to be booked as assets if certain conditions can be proved and if they have been cumulatively fulfilled. Among other aspects, it must be verifiable that the development activities are very likely to result in future accrual of funds, which does not only cover the normal costs but also the corresponding development costs. Capitalized development costs for customer orders are amortized with the beginning of the serial delivery in accordance with the customer's release orders for the entire term of the model. The Group's research and development expenses in the financial year amounted to approx. 2.7% (previous year: 2.6% excluding Peguform Group) of total revenues.
Goodwill results from acquisitions of subsidiaries or interests in associated companies. Since January 1, 2005, goodwill is not yearly amortized but is subject to an impairment test at least once a year. If a subsidiary or an associated company is sold, the proportionate goodwill will be taken into account in the calculation of the gain or loss of the disposal.
The evaluation of goodwill is performed with regard to the acquisition costs less the accumulated impairment losses (see also the annex "Impairment")
Tangible assets are valued at the costs of acquisition or production, reduced by scheduled amortizations, or the lower achievable market price. The scheduled amortizations will be determined based on a straight-line method.
For limited-life assets, the following rates are used for the scheduled depreciation:
| in % | |
|---|---|
| Buildings and leasehold improvements | 4,0-20,0 |
| Technical equipment and machinery | 6,7-50,0 |
| Other equipment, fixtures, fittings and equipment | 10,0-50,0 |
Substantial impairment beyond the scope of the scheduled amortizations will be taken into account by extraordinary amortizations. In the case of a discontinuation of the reasons for extraordinary amortizations, corresponding revaluations will be performed.
In the case of fixed assets being immobilized, sold or given up, the profit or loss from the difference of the sales revenue and the net book value will be recorded as other operating income or expenses.
Maintenance expenses will be recorded as expenses in the financial year of their occurrence.
Leased assets for which basically all risks and chances resulting from the property of assets were transferred (finance lease), are valued as assets with their market value or the lower cash value in correspondence with IAS 17. The amortization was performed according to schedule over the economic useful life or over the shorter periods of the leasing agreement. The payment obligations resulting from the future leasing rates are discounted and recorded as liabilities.
Government grants and subventions from other third parties are recorded under liabilities and liquidated in accordance with the useful life of the allocated asset.
Other investments and loans are included under other financial assets. They are valued at the costs of acquisition or the lower market value at the balance sheet date. Interest-bearing loans are balanced with their nominal value.
Interests in joint ventures are balanced pursuant to IAS 31 by applying the equity method of accounting.
The investments balanced at the acquisition costs are investments, which are not listed on an active market and whose current value can, therefore, not be determined on a reliable basis.
The loans are subject to variable interest rates so that their book value almost corresponds to the market value.
Extraordinary amortizations will be performed for all financial assets in the case of impairment (see also the annex "Impairment").
Inventories are evaluated at their acquisition costs or production costs or the lower achievable market value on the balance sheet date. The determination of the acquisition and production costs is performed for similar assets in accordance with the weighted average cost method or in accordance with similar methods. The production costs only include the directly attributable costs and the proportionate overhead costs. Interests on borrowed capital are not capitalized.
Receivables are capitalized at costs of acquisition. Recognizable risks are taken into account by performing appropriate value adjustments.
In other accounts receivable also those derivative financial assets are reported that show a positive market value and are classified as "held for trading".
The investment portfolio as of December 31, 2009 contains shares which have been classified as "available for sale" like in the previous year. The adjustment of the present value was recorded under the equity capital not affecting net income. The evaluation is performed with the stock exchange price on the balance sheet date so that the present value can be reliably determined.
Cash and other short time financial means consist of cash on hand, cheques and cash at banks as well as securities, which are used by the Group for liquidity management. They are evaluated at market values which are formed on sufficiently solvent markets and which can thus be reliably determined.
For the purpose of the impairment test, the POLYTEC GROUP summarizes its assets, which are generating cash flow on the lowest level (cash-generating unit). Goodwill is assigned to those cash-generating units which are expected to benefit from synergies and which represent the lowest Group-internal level of the management monitoring of the cash flow.
The value in use of the asset corresponds to the present value of the estimated future cash flows from continuing use of such asset and from the disposal at the end of its useful life applying a fair market discount rate before taxes, which is adjusted to the specific risks of the assets. The estimation of the future cash flow is based on a three year planning horizon. The interest rate used for calculating the present value is the weighted average capital costs of the Group and was defined with 10% to 11% for the financial year 2009. If no individual cash flow can be determined for an individual asset, the determination of the value of benefit is performed for the next higher unit to which this asset belongs and for which an individual cash flow can be determined.
Any impairment loss will be disclosed with the amount by which the book value of the individual asset or the cash-generating unit exceeds the achievable amount. The achievable amount is the higher amount of the net selling price and the use value. Impairment losses proportionately reduce the carrying amount of the assets of the cash-generating unit.
In the case of a discontinuation of the reasons for extraordinary amortizations, corresponding revaluations will be performed for fixed assets. Goodwill, which has been amortized due to impairment, is no longer written up.
Due to legal obligations, the employees of Austrian Group companies who have joined the company prior to January 1, 2002 will receive a one-time severance payment in the case of a termination of the employment contract or in the case of retirement. The amount of compensation depends at the number of years of service and the applicable income at the end of the employment. For all employment contracts concluded after December 31, 2002, payments, which will be recorded as expenses, will be made to a company pension fund for employees.
The provisions for severance payments are determined on a standardized basis with the "projected unit credit method" and by applying a discount rate of 5.5% (previous year: 5.5%) as well as by including a dynamic rate for future salary increases of 2.5% (previous year: 3.0%). A reduction for fluctuation of personnel based on the years of service is included. The assumed retirement age for men and women, taking into account certain temporary arrangements, is still defined with 62 years (no change to the previous year).
The corridor amortization method is applied for actuarial profits and losses. If actuarial profits/losses exceed the cash value of the benefit obligation at the beginning of the financial year by more than 10.0%, they are distributed over the expected average remaining service lifetime of the employees and booked as income or expenses. The current service costs, past service costs to be settled as well as actuarial profits/losses are disclosed in the income statement of the Group as part of personnel costs. Interest costs corresponding to severance payment provisions are shown in the financial results.
Due to legal obligations, the employees of Italian group companies may receive non-recurring payments in the case of a termination of the employment contract or in the case of other legally defined events. The amount of compensation depends on the number of years of service and the applicable income on the payment date of the compensation. Similar obligations apply for employees of Polish or Turkish companies.
Pension obligations apply for certain employees of German group companies. Accounting of these obligations is performed in accordance with IAS 19. For this purpose, the present value of the defined benefit obligation DBO is calculated and compared to the current value of the planned assets existent on the balance sheet date. The pension provisions are calculated according to the "projected unit credit method", where, depending on the distribution of the obligations to entitlements and liquid pensions and due to the specific regulations of the individual pension funds, a discount rate of 5.5% (previous year: 5.75% to 6.0%) as well as an increase of 1.5% (previous year: 1.5% to 1.75%) will be applied. The guidelines 2005G – Klaus Heubeck are used for the actuarial calculations.
Interest costs resulting from the long-term provisions for personnel are recorded in the income statement of the Group under financial expenses.
Other long-term obligations towards employees
Based on collective agreements or other company agreements, employees are entitled to receive a certain anniversary payment depending on their length of service. Provisions have been set aside for these obligations.
The income tax expenses (the income tax credit) include the actual taxes and the deferred taxes.
The actual taxes for the individual companies are calculated from the taxable income of the company and the applicable tax rate in the corresponding country.
Deferred taxes are calculated, in particular, for value differences disclosed in the tax and commercial balance sheet of the individual companies resulting from deviating periods, as well as for consolidation bookings. They are determined according to IAS 12 using the balance sheet liability method. Furthermore, the probably realizable tax advantage from existing accumulated losses is included in the calculation. Deferred tax assets on losses carried forward were formed as far as their utilization is expected within a foreseeable period. The calculation of the deferred taxes is based on the customary national income tax rate.
The value of the trade accounts payable results from the present value of the received services at the date of their occurrence. In the following, these liabilities are valued at continued acquisition costs.
Other liabilities, especially accrued interest-bearing liabilities, are reported with their repayment amount unless there is no substantial difference to the present value. Subsequently these liabilities are valued at continued acquisition costs.
The other provisions disclosed under liabilities are recorded if there are recognizable risks and uncertain obligations until the preparation of the balance sheet. They will be specified with the amount which proves to be the most probable amount after careful assessment of the circumstances. Reserves for expenses will not be booked as liabilities.
These positions also include any contingent liabilities in accordance with IFRS 3.
Financial assets and liabilities are disclosed in the balance sheet if the Group becomes a contractual party of a financial instrument.
Financial assets are derecognized from the accounts if the contractual rights from the assets expire or if the assets are transferred with all substantial rights and obligations. Financial liabilities are derecognized from the accounts if the contractual obligations have been balanced, deleted or expired. Purchases and sales of financial instruments common in the market are balanced on the settlement date.
Financial assets are categorized as follows:
Financial liabilities are categorized as follows:
a. Financial liabilities measured at residual book value.
Other categories applicable according to IAS 39 are not applied.
In accordance with the financial policy of the Group, derivative financial instruments are held for hedging purposes and to optimize the net interest result of the Group.
The following pending derivative financial instruments are held on December 31, 2009:
| Currency | Long-term | Nominal in TEUR |
Fair value in TEUR |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Interest rate swap | EUR | Dec. 11 | 5,000 | -180 |
| Interest rate swap | EUR | Oct. 12 | 10,000 | -691 |
| Interest rate swap | EUR | Apr. 12 | 1,000 | -17 |
| Interest rate swap | EUR | Feb. 14 | 2,000 | -31 |
In the course of the financial year, forward exchange operations were used to hedge the foreign exchange risk, which is part of the Group's business in South Africa. No open forward exchange operations are existent on the balance sheet date.
Interest rate swaps cannot be assigned to a specified balance sheet item but to a portfolio of financial liabilities and serve for the optimization of the net interest income.
In the case of missing market prices, renowned evaluation models, especially option price models and analyses of the discounted expected cash flows, were used for the determination of the fair values.
All derivative financial instruments are categorized as "held for trading".
Hedge accounting procedures in accordance with IAS 39 are not applied.
Revenues from the sale of products and goods are realized upon transfer of the risks and opportunities to the buyer. Operating expenses affect the net income at the time of claiming the services or at the time of their occurrence.
The financing expenses include the interest and interest equivalent expenses arising from debt financing and finance leasing transactions as well as the interest component of the variation of the obligations to employees.
The financial revenues include the interest, dividends and other revenues realized from the assessment of funds and the investments in financial assets. Interest yields are realized in proportion to time taking into account the effective interest rate of the asset. Dividend yields are shown at the occurrence of the legitimate claim.
Profits and losses from the sale of financial assets, impairment losses from financial assets, exchange rate profits and losses in connection with financing as well as results from security transactions are shown in the financial result.
Estimations and assumptions have to be made to a certain degree in the consolidated financial statements, which have an influence on the balanced assets and liabilities, information with regard to other obligations on the balance sheet date and the recognition of income and expenses during the reporting period. The actual amounts to be realized in the future may deviate from the estimations. Especially the assumptions concerning future cash flows of cash-generating units which are based on the medium-term plans of the Group may prove to be incorrect and may result in certain effects on assets (especially goodwill and active deferred taxes) in the following years.
The assessment of provisions for severance payments and pension contributions is based on a specific method, which applies parameters such as the expected deduction of accrued interests, increases in wage payments and pension contributions as well as anticipated earnings on planned assets. In the case the development of these relevant parameters significantly differs from the original expectations, this might have considerable repercussions over the provisions and, consequently, over the Group's net expenses for severance payments and pension contributions.
In assessing the recoverability of deferred tax assets, the Board of Directors considers whether it is probable that all deferred tax assets will be realized. The realization of deferred tax assets is dependent upon the generation of future taxable income during the periods in which these temporary differences become deductible. If the company is unable to generate sufficient future taxable income, no deferred tax benefits from operating loss carry-forwards can be recognized and their value has therefore to be adjusted correspondingly.
The segments represent product groups and correspond to the internal reporting system of the Group. In correspondence with the product groups, the different segments are divided into the Automotive Systems, Automotive Composites and Car Styling Divisions. A detailed description of the business activities of the different divisions can be found in section A. of the notes on the consolidated accounts.
Assets and liabilities as well as expenses and earnings were only assigned to the individual segments as far as they could be assigned to the corresponding segments directly or with the help of a reasonable method. Positions, which could not be assigned this way, are shown in the columns named "Other segments" and "Consolidation". The transfer prices between the segments are based on comparable conditions usual on the market.
There are no substantial valuation differences of the assets or liabilities of the individual segments. Further information can be found in the explanations of the accounting and valuation principles applied for the Group.
Being a supplier of the automotive industry, the Group only depends on a small number of major customers. In 2009 and 2008, only three customer groups achieved more than 10% of the Group's entire sales. In total, the three main customers accounted for roughly 55% of total sales in 2009 (previous year: 60%). Due to the broad variety of models and brands of our major customers which are operating both in the passenger car sector and in the commercial vehicle sector, all separately reported business fields are affected by the relationship between the customer and the supplier, but, of course, to a different degree.
On the balance sheet dates, the specifications concerning geographical areas on the Group level can be summarized as follows:
| External sales | Deferred tax assets | Obligations for employees |
||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| in TEUR | 2009 | 2008 adjusted |
2009 | 2008 | 2009 | 2008 |
| Austria | 32,838 | 48,367 | 9,261 | 10,594 | 1,774 | 1,885 |
| Germany | 404,356 | 492,936 | 4,390 | 7,048 | 22,322 | 24,686 |
| Other EU | 136,735 | 178,895 | 324 | 3,925 | 1,405 | 1,569 |
| Rest of the world |
33,118 | 48,084 | 0 | 1,057 | 160 | 125 |
| Group | 607,047 | 768,282 | 13,974 | 22,624 | 25,661 | 28,264 |
All information for the segments of the Group can be found in annex 1 to the notes on the consolidated financial statement.
Sales according to categories are divided as follows:
| in TEUR | 2009 | 2008 adjusted |
|---|---|---|
| Sales and other sales | 522,745 | 729,493 |
| Tooling and development sales | 84,302 | 38,788 |
| Total | 607,047 | 768,282 |
| in TEUR | 2009 | 2008 adjusted |
|---|---|---|
| Earnings from the disposals and appreciation of fixed assets excluding financial assets |
560 | 165 |
| Income from release of provisions | 7,442 | 10,975 |
| Exchange rate gains | 2,121 | 758 |
| Other income | 12,316 | 9,765 |
| Total | 22,439 | 21,663 |
| in TEUR | 2009 | 2008 adjusted |
|---|---|---|
| Material expenses | 254,953 | 310,884 |
| Expenses for services received | 75,241 | 126,251 |
| Total | 330,194 | 437,135 |
| in TEUR | 2009 | 2008 adjusted |
|---|---|---|
| Wages and salaries | 143,995 | 175,551 |
| Expenses for statutory social charges | 35,114 | 36,907 |
| Expenses for severance payments and pensions |
5,302 | 2,981 |
| Other personnel expenses | 2,098 | 1,522 |
| Total | 186,509 | 216,961 |
The average number of employees was:
| 2009 | 2008 adjusted |
|
|---|---|---|
| Workers | 4,077 | 4,301 |
| Employees | 1,159 | 1,204 |
| Total | 5,236 | 5,505 |
On the balance sheet date of December 31, 2009, the POLYTEC GROUP employed 4,976 employees (3,871 workers and 1,105 white-collar employees). In the previous year's figures, employees of discontinued operations are not included.
| in TEUR | 2009 | 2008 adjusted |
|---|---|---|
| Leased staff | 9,111 | 22,656 |
| Maintenance | 13,765 | 19,312 |
| Transport | 8,239 | 14,403 |
| Rent building | 15,183 | 14,173 |
| Other rent and leases | 5,327 | 6,025 |
| IT and communication costs | 3,366 | 3,757 |
| Legal and consulting fees | 2,903 | 3,406 |
| Loss on exchange rate | 1,626 | 2,538 |
| Other expenses | 10,493 | 12,729 |
| Other sales expenses | 3,874 | 4,336 |
| Other administration expenses | 8,449 | 10,273 |
| Risk provision and damaging | 3,853 | 2,088 |
| Non income based taxes and charges | 518 | 501 |
| Losses on disposal of fixed assets, excluding financial assets |
380 | 117 |
| Total | 87,091 | 116,314 |
Pursuant to IAS 36 impairment tests are to be carried out when there is an indication of impairment with regard to the company's assets. Due to these impairment tests, extraordinary amortizations on production plants especially at the Spanish branches of the Group amounting to TEUR 3,965 (previous year: TEUR 1,860) were required. In the previous year, impairment charges mainly applied to production plants in Sweden.
According to IFRS 3 (Business Combinations), the goodwill will not be amortized from the beginning of the financial year 2005 but is subject to an annual impairment test.
Due to these impairment tests, no goodwill amortizations were required in 2009. In the previous year, total goodwill amortizations amounting to TEUR 6,312 were required.
The restructuring costs relate to personnel measures (TEUR 2,891), costs in connection with the closure of the site in Sweden (TEUR 1,845) and costs in connection with the disposal of the Peguform Group (TEUR 3,085), which where not attributable to the results of discontinued operations.
| in TEUR | 2009 | 2008 adjusted |
|---|---|---|
| Income from associated companies | 0 | 142 |
| Income from securities | 0 | 1,006 |
| Interest income and income from securities | 776 | 3,450 |
| Depreciation of financial assets | -45 | -1,000 |
| Interest component of pension commitments | -1,296 | -1,225 |
| Other interest expenses | -6,365 | -8,384 |
| Impairment of securities held as current assets | -9,944 | 0 |
| Other financial result | -524 | -117 |
| Total | -17,397 | -6,128 |
The interest component from pension promises, the depreciation of financial assets as well as the impairment of securities held as current assets are non-cash items. All other interest expenses or income are cash items.
The impairment of securities held as current assets relates to shares that were classified as "available for sale". Because of the sustained significant impairment, the overwhelming majority of the impairment charges recognized in equity in the previous year had to be part of P&L in 2009.
| in TEUR | 2009 | 2008 adjusted |
|---|---|---|
| Current income taxes | 2,074 | 3,562 |
| thereof non periodic | -650 | 767 |
| Changes in deferred income taxes | 1,722 | -5,606 |
| thereof non periodic | 2,090 | 0 |
| Total | 3,796 | -2,044 |
| thereof non periodic | 1,440 | 767 |
The income tax expense of the financial year 2009 amounting to TEUR 3,796 is lower by an amount of TEUR 15,704 compared to the calculated income tax revenue amounting to TEUR 11,908, which would result by applying a tax rate of 25% to the result prior to income taxes amounting to TEUR -47,633.
The reasons for the difference between the calculated and the actually shown income tax expense of the Group can be summarized as follows:
| in TEUR | 2009 | 2008 adjusted |
|---|---|---|
| Earnings before tax | -47,633 | 7,746 |
| thereof 25% calculated tax on income | -11,908 | 1,936 |
| Changes in value adjustments for deferred tax assets |
13,071 | 13,647 |
| Permanent differences | 2,082 | -932 |
| Differences from the discrepancy between the local and consolidated tax rate |
-841 | 1,754 |
| Effects from amortizations of investments in associated companies |
775 | -18,374 |
| Other items | -823 | -842 |
| Taxes on income | 2,356 | -2,810 |
| Non-periodic income tax expense/revenue | 1,440 | 767 |
| Taxes on income for the reporting period | 3,796 | -2,044 |
The increase in value adjustments for deferred tax assets relates especially to the Automotive Systems Division, the Automotive Composite Division as well as POLYTEC Holding AG and was required in view of the expectation that they will be of limited use in future.
Deferred taxes were capitalized for individual Group companies although they suffered losses in 2009. On the basis of present planning statements, the Board of Directors assumes that the capitalized amounts can be realized in the foreseeable future.
The result from 'held for sale' divisions relates solely to the Peguform Group, which was sold in the reporting year and is as follows:
| in TEUR | 2009 | 2008 adjusted |
|---|---|---|
| Sales revenues | 558,881 | 313,186 |
| Total output | 589,163 | 350,169 |
| Cost of materials | -399,359 | -225,008 |
| Personnel expenses | -121,953 | -60,208 |
| Other operating expenses | -66,424 | -50,104 |
| EBITDA | 1,428 | 14,849 |
| Amortizations | 0 | -11,984 |
| Impairment acc. to IFRS 5 | -47,651 | 0 |
| EBIT | -46,223 | 2,865 |
| Financial result | -6,148 | -6,906 |
| Result before taxes | -52,371 | -4,041 |
| Income taxes | 1,895 | -2,754 |
| Net loss for the year | -50,477 | -6,795 |
| Gain on deconsolidation of the Peguform Group | 15,751 | 0 |
| Share of the profits attributable to minority shareholders |
-846 | -780 |
| Less interest expenses netted off against interest waivers |
-3,078 | 0 |
| Result from "held for sale" divisions | -38,650 | -7,575 |
The interest waivers relating to interest expense incurred in the financial year 2009 of EUR 3.1 million are netted off against the matching interest expense. The remaining deconsolidation gain of EUR 12.7 million was allocated to the result from "held for sale" divisions, in addition to the current loss by the Peguform Group in the first two quarters of 2009, and to the depreciation in the non-current assets "held for sale" on the anticipated value on disposal before taking minority interests into account.
The current result of the Peguform Group in the first half of 2009 was calculated on the basis of the reporting to compile the half-year 2009 financial statements and has been correctly apportioned within the result from "held for sale" divisions between the current result and the gain on deconsolidation.
The classification of the intangible assets and their development summarized in the consolidated balance sheet is shown in the consolidated movement of assets (annex 2 to the notes).
As in the previous year no intangible assets are mortgaged or pledged as a security for bank liabilities.
The goodwill is allocated to the following divisions:
| in TEUR | Dec. 31, 2009 | Dec. 31, 2008 |
|---|---|---|
| Car Styling | 12,643 | 12,643 |
| Automotive Composites | 119 | 119 |
| Other | 6,537 | 6,537 |
| Total | 19,300 | 19,300 |
The classification of the tangible assets summarized in the consolidated balance sheet as well as their development is shown in the consolidated movement of assets (annex 2 to the notes).
The future expenses from non-terminable operating leasing agreements (without the obligations towards the POLYTEC Immobilien Group which are explained in the notes under E. 7) on December 31, 2009 amounted to TEUR 35,079 (previous year: TEUR 44,466) and are falling due as follows:
| in TEUR | Dec. 31, 2009 | Dec. 31, 2008 |
|---|---|---|
| Within one year | 11,599 | 12,088 |
| Longer than one year and within five years | 23,480 | 32,378 |
| Longer than five years | 0 | 0 |
Technical equipment and machinery include finance lease goods with a book value amounting to TEUR 13,957 (previous year: TEUR 148,263).
The finance lease results in leasing obligations to third parties amounting to TEUR 15,038 (previous year: TEUR 79,437). The specified leasing obligations (cash values including redemption for residual value) are falling due as follows:
| in TEUR | Dec. 31, 2009 | Dec. 31, 2008 |
|---|---|---|
| Within one year | 10,136 | 40,426 |
| Longer than one year and within five years | 4,902 | 32,051 |
| Longer than five years | 0 | 6,960 |
The leasing payments (without redemption for residual value) corresponding to the cash values amount to TEUR 14,730 (previous year: TEUR 77,082) and are falling due as follows:
| in TEUR | Dec. 31, 2009 | Dec. 31, 2008 |
|---|---|---|
| Within one year | 9,509 | 40,498 |
| Longer than one year and within five years | 5,222 | 30,827 |
| Longer than five years | 0 | 5,757 |
In the financial year 2009, extraordinary amortizations on fixed assets amounting to TEUR 3,965 (previous year: TEUR 1,860) had to be recognized. Revaluations (previous year: TEUR 0) were not made in the financial year.
TEUR 34,662 (previous year: TEUR 50,083) of the tangible assets are mortgaged or pledged as a security for bank liabilities.
The joint ventures disposed of in the course of the divestment of the Peguform Group were included in the consolidated financial statements until the date of their disposal by applying the equity method of accounting and can be shown as follows:
Changes in the reporting of associated companies
| in TEUR | Celulosa Fabril (CEFA) S.A. |
SPPM Sociedale Portuguesa de Pintura e Modulos S.A. |
|---|---|---|
| As of Jan. 1, 2009 | 7,414 | 0 |
| Share of profit/loss | 345 | 0 |
| Change in consolidation | -7,759 | 0 |
| As of Dec. 31, 2009 | 0 | 0 |
Since the shareholders' equity of SPPM Sociedale Portuguesa de Pintura e Modulos S.A was negative as of December 31, 2008 as well as at the time of the disposal, the carrying value of the joint venture is to be reported as a zero-amount for both dates.
The Group has issued long-term loans to companies of the POLYTEC Immobilien Group (see also the explanations with regard to affiliated companies in E. 7). The contractually agreed cash flow from the agreed repayments and interests (with the interest rate at the corresponding balance sheet date) can be summarized as follows:
| in TEUR | Dec. 31, 2009 | Dec. 31, 2008 |
|---|---|---|
| Asset value | 2,000 | 2,483 |
| Cash flow of the following year | 521 | 1,050 |
| Cash flow in the years 2 to 5 | 1,562 | 1,673 |
| Cash flow in more than 5 years | 0 | 0 |
The differences between the amount stated in the tax balance sheet and the IFRS balance sheet result from the following differences and take effect on deferred taxes:
| in TEUR | Assets | Dec. 31, 2009 Liabilities |
Assets | Dec. 31, 2008 Liabilities |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Intangible assets | 0 | 0 | 22 | 4,083 |
| Tangible assets | -975 | 265 | -2,986 | 42,763 |
| Provision for severance payments |
360 | -32 | 367 | -25 |
| Provisions for pensions | 465 | 0 | 735 | 588 |
| Provisions for personnel | 314 | 0 | 478 | -1,130 |
| Tax losses carried forward | 10,866 | 0 | 12,296 | -140 |
| Leasing liabilities | 1,947 | 0 | 3,174 | -17,766 |
| Other provisions | 2,785 | 0 | 1,648 | 0 |
| Others | -1,854 | 48 | 6,817 | -2,703 |
| Subtotal | 13,907 | 281 | 22,551 | 25,671 |
| Consolidation of debt | 0 | 4,817 | 0 | 2,548 |
| Elimination of inter-company profits |
67 | 0 | 73 | 0 |
| Capitalization/provisions for deferred taxes |
13,974 | 5,098 | 22,624 | 28,218 |
Deferred taxes on losses carried forward of TEUR 29,734 (previous year (adjusted): TEUR 16,663) were not capitalized.
The inventory is structured as follows:
| in TEUR | Dec. 31, 2009 | Dec. 31, 2008 |
|---|---|---|
| Raw materials and supplies | 27,429 | 68,889 |
| Unfinished goods | 17,871 | 70,739 |
| Work in progress | 27,660 | 63,179 |
| Advance payments received | -23,526 | -50,225 |
| Finished goods and merchandise | 20,606 | 23,432 |
| Advance payments made | 2,932 | 1,829 |
| Total | 72,972 | 177,842 |
TEUR 33,141 (previous year: TEUR 7,524) of the inventory are pledged as a security for bank liabilities.
| in TEUR | Dec. 31, 2009 | Dec. 31, 2008 |
|---|---|---|
| Trade accounts receivable | 54,976 | 146,655 |
| thereof with a residual term > 1 year | 3,616 | 10,389 |
| thereof from associated companies | 69 | 149 |
| thereof from affiliated companies | 2 | 126 |
| Other receivables and assets | 19,453 | 27,147 |
| thereof with a residual term > 1 year | 1,135 | 769 |
| thereof from associated companies | 0 | 0 |
| thereof from affiliated companies | 0 | 8 |
| thereof from related companies | 125 | 59 |
| Income tax receivable | 1,200 | 11,260 |
| thereof with a residual term > 1 year | 0 | 0 |
| Prepayments and deferred charges | 1,073 | 2,269 |
| thereof with a residual term > 1 year | 0 | 178 |
| Total | 76,702 | 187,331 |
| thereof with a residual term > 1 year | 4,751 | 11,336 |
| thereof from associated companies | 69 | 157 |
| thereof from affiliated companies | 2 | 126 |
| thereof from related companies | 125 | 59 |
In the scope of silent global assignments, TEUR 42,739 (previous year: TEUR 83,241) of the accounts receivable from deliveries and services have been transferred to banks for security purposes.
The maturity structure of the accounts receivable from deliveries and services for third parties at the balance sheet date can be summarized as follows:
| in TEUR | Dec. 31, 2009 | Dec. 31, 2008 | 21. Financial assets |
|---|---|---|---|
| Non payable | 43,795 | 121,189 | |
| Due up to 60 days | 8,464 | 20,666 | |
| Due up to 120 days | 867 | 2,139 | |
| Due up to 360 days | 1,208 | 2,274 | |
| Longer than 360 days | 642 | 386 | |
| Total | 54,976 | 146,655 | Loans and receivables |
For the determination of the recoverability of the accounts receivable, not only the individual creditworthiness of the debtor, which is a rather uncritical factor due to the customer structure of the Group, but especially their days overdue have to be taken into account. According to estimations made by the management, there are no substantial differences between the book value and the market value of the accounts receivable.
The existing value adjustments concerning accounts receivable developed as follows in the financial year:
| in TEUR | Trade receivables | Other receivables |
|---|---|---|
| Balance as of Jan. 1, 2009 | 7,291 | 354 |
| Changes in consolidation | -4,513 | 0 |
| Use | -1,063 | -316 |
| Release | -170 | 0 |
| Allocation | 1,786 | 0 |
| Foreign exchange rate differences | -156 | 39 |
| Balance as of Dec. 31, 2009 | 3,176 | 78 |
The inventory affects the shares in the Grammer AG held by the POLYTEC Holding AG on December 31, 2009.
The shares are pledged as collateral for a loan amounting to EUR 6.0 million.
| in TEUR | Dec. 31, 2009 | Dec. 31, 2008 |
|---|---|---|
| Cash and cash equivalents | 31,857 | 100,768 |
Essential restrictions concerning the amounts included in this position were not existent on the balance sheet date. An amount of TEUR 189 is pledged to a bank.
| in TEUR | Amortized cost |
Fair value without any impact on profit or loss |
Fair value through profit or loss |
Carrying amount Dec. 31, 2009 |
Market value Dec. 31, 2009 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Loans and receivables | |||||
| Receivables and other assets | 70,884 | 0 | 0 | 70,884 | 70,884 |
| Loans | 2,000 | 0 | 0 | 2,000 | 2,000 |
| Investments in other compnies |
1,195 | 0 | 0 | 1,195 | 1,195 |
| Cash and cash equivalents (short term) |
31,857 | 0 | 0 | 31,857 | 31,857 |
| 105,935 | 0 | 0 | 105,935 | 105,935 | |
| Held for trading | |||||
| Interest rate derivatives | 0 | 0 | -919 | -919 | -919 |
| Available for sale | |||||
| Other securities | 15,876 | 0 | -9,944 | 5,932 | 5,932 |
| Total | 121,811 | 0 | -10,863 | 110,948 | 110,948 |
| in TEUR | Amortized cost |
Fair value without any impact on profit or loss |
Fair value through profit or loss |
Carrying amount Dec. 31, 2008 |
Market value Dec. 31, 2008 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Loans and receivables | |||||
| Receivables and other assets | 171,702 | 0 | 0 | 171,702 | 171,702 |
| Loans | 2,483 | 0 | 0 | 2,483 | 2,483 |
| Investments in other compnies |
1,263 | 0 | 0 | 1,263 | 1,263 |
| Cash and cash equivalents (short term) |
100,768 | 0 | 0 | 100,768 | 100,768 |
| 276,217 | 0 | 0 | 276,217 | 276,217 | |
| Held for trading | |||||
| Interest rate derivatives | 0 | 0 | -642 | -642 | -642 |
| Available for sale | |||||
| Other securities | 15,876 | -9,080 | 0 | 6,796 | 6,796 |
| Total | 292,093 | -9,080 | -642 | 282,371 | 282,371 |
Cash and cash equivalents, trade receivables and other shortterm financial assets have short-term maturity. Therefore, the carrying values of these assets are nearly similar to the residual value at the balance sheet date. The residual value of other long-term receivables and other long-term financial assets accords to the cash value of the payments in respect to the actual market parameter.
Loans and receivables also include securities, which are not stockexchange listed. Therefore, allocation of the fair value of these assets was not reliable and so the carrying value was recognized at amortized costs.
Financial assets measured at market value are allocated as follows to the three stages of the fair value hierarchy:
| in TEUR | thereof Stage 1 |
thereof Stage 2 |
thereof Stage 3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Held for trading | |||
| Interest rate derivatives | 0 | -919 | 0 |
| Available for sale | |||
| Securities held as current assets | 5,932 | 0 | 0 |
| 5,932 | -919 | 0 |
These three stages distinguish fair values according to the significance of the factors included in the measurement and illustrate the extent to which observable market data are available in measuring the fair value.
The stages of the fair value hierarchy and their application to assets and liabilities can be described as follows:
Stage 1:
Listed market prices for identical assets or liabilities on active markets.
Information other than listed market prices, which is observable directly (e.g. prices) or indirectly (e.g. derived from prices).
Information for assets and liabilities, which is not based on observable market data.
The equity capital of the POLYTEC Holding AG on the balance sheet date amounts to TEUR 22,330 (previous year: TEUR 22,330) and is divided into 22,329,585 ordinary shares (previous year: 22,329,585 ordinary shares) with a nominal value of EUR 1.00 each.
According to a decision of the Annual General Meeting of May 21, 2008, an authorized capital stock was agreed. With the corresponding approval of the Supervisory Board and for a period of five years from the registration of the authorized capital stock, the Board of Directors is entitled to increase the equity capital by up to TEUR 11,164,792.00 by issuing new shares with a minimum issue price of EUR 1.00 each. New shares can be issued also excluding shareholders' subscription rights.
In January of 2006, the Group has purchased 29,934 own shares with a nominal value of EUR 1.00 each (0.13% of the equity capital) and a purchase price of EUR 7.20 per share from a retired member of the Group's management (decision of the Annual General Meeting of October 27, 2004). Since then, the inventory has not been changed. The own shares purchased in the previous year are evaluated with their acquisition costs and deducted from the Group's equity capital.
The capital reserves include the agio, which has been deposited on the occasion of capital increases, less the costs of the initial public offering of the POLYTEC Holding AG in the financial year 2006, which can be allocated to the capital increase. In the previous year, on the basis of Austrian law, capital reserves of TEUR 20,220 were liquidated in the individual financial statements of POLYTEC Holding AG to cover the loss for the year.
Retained earnings comprise the past earnings of the Group, which were carried forward as well as other changes in equity.
ThePOLYTECHolding AGis not subjectto any statutory minimum capital requirements. However, the Group considers a sufficient equity capital stock as an important element of the insolvency reserve. The relation between the equity capital and the total capital can be summarized as follows:
| in TEUR | Dec. 31, 2009 | Dec. 31, 2008 |
|---|---|---|
| Total equity | 61,483 | 154,792 |
| Balance sheet total | 332,081 | 1,020,816 |
| Equity ratio | 18.5% | 15.2% |
For POLYTEC, the term "capital management" means the control of the equity capital and the net financial liabilities, which can be summarized under the term "capital employed". By optimizing both components, the group tries to optimize the return of the shareholders. Apart from the equity ratio, POLYTEC especially uses the parameters "gearing" (net financial liabilities against equity capital) and "leverage ratio" (net financial liabilities against EBITDA) for the assessment of its debt capacity. The entire costs of the used capital and the risks related to the different types of capital are monitored on a permanent basis.
According to IAS 33 (Earnings per Share) the "basic earnings per share" result from the division of the net income allocated to the shareholders (annual net profit of the group after minority interests) by the weighted average of outstanding ordinary shares during the reporting period.
| 2009 | 2008 adjusted |
||
|---|---|---|---|
| Net income after minorities | TEUR | -90,506 | 1,844 |
| Result from continuing operations after minority interests |
TEUR | -51,856 | 9,418 |
| Weighted average number of ordinary shares issued |
Share | 22,329,585 | 22,329,585 |
| Average number of own shares | Share | 29,934 | 29,934 |
| Average number of shares outstanding | Share | 22,299,651 | 22,299,651 |
| Earnings per share | EUR/share | -4.06 | 0.08 |
| Earnings per share from continuing operations |
EUR/share | -2.33 | 0.42 |
The diluted earnings per share correspond to the non-diluted earnings per share since no financial instruments with dilution effect are circulating at the moment.
For the financial year 2009, the Board of Directors of the POLY-TEC Holding AG will propose to waive the payment of a dividend as in the previous year.
This position includes all interest-bearing liabilities with a remaining term of more than one year and can be structured as follows:
| in TEUR | Dec. 31, 2009 | Dec. 31, 2008 |
|---|---|---|
| Liabilities due to banks | 7,425 | 30,682 |
| thereof with a residual term > 5 years | 4,000 | 3,007 |
| thereof with collateral securities | 4,523 | 26,356 |
| Other interest-bearing liabilities | 262 | 2,370 |
| thereof with a residual term > 5 years | 0 | 219 |
| Lease liabilities | 4,902 | 39,011 |
| thereof with a residual term > 5 years | 0 | 6,960 |
| Total | 12,589 | 72,063 |
The substantial part of the liabilities towards credit institutes secured by property can be prematurely terminated by the financing banks, if the equity ratio of the Group falls below a predefined value or if the ratio of the net financial liabilities and the EBITDA exceeds a defined value.
The agreed ratios were not achieved in the financial year 2009. The liabilities in question are therefore shown as current interest-bearing liabilities in the consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2009 and are not included in the above table. The Board of Directors assumes that the lending banks will not make use of their cancellation option. The Group's main lending bank has also confirmed in writing in its letter dated March 9, 2010 that it intends to maintain its financing commitments if the Group's performance matches current planning figures.
The expiring long-term and short-term interest-bearing liabilities of the Group towards credit institutes are existent in the following currencies:
| 2009 | 2008 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Proportion % |
Average ordinary interest |
Proportion % |
Average ordinary interest |
|
| EUR | 95.8 | 4.71 | 97.5 | 3.76 |
| GBP | 0.7 | 4.00 | 0.6 | 4.40 |
| SEK | 0.0 | n/a | 0.6 | 3.61 |
| PLN | 3.5 | 8.48 | 0.1 | 6.69 |
| BRL | 0.0 | n/a | 1.2 | 3.22 |
This position summarizes all long-term provisions for obligations due to employees:
| in TEUR | Dec. 31, 2009 | Dec. 31, 2008 |
|---|---|---|
| Provision for severance payments | 1,613 | 1,713 |
| T.F.R. Severance payment entitlements | 1,365 | 1,529 |
| Provision for pensions | 21,211 | 22,566 |
| Provision for long-service bonus payments | 1,272 | 2,292 |
| Other long-term provisions | 201 | 164 |
| Total | 25,661 | 28,264 |
Further information about the development of the provisions for severance payments, pensions and long-service bonus payments in the previous financial years is given in annex 3 to the notes on the consolidated financial statement.
| in TEUR | Dec. 31, 2009 | Dec. 31, 2008 |
|---|---|---|
| Contingent liabilities and provisions | 5,259 | 2,325 |
| Government grants (residual term > 1 year) | 541 | 3,421 |
| Total | 5,800 | 5,746 |
| in TEUR | Dec. 31, 2009 | Dec. 31, 2008 |
|---|---|---|
| Trade accounts payable | 55,960 | 154,264 |
| thereof due to associated companies | 56 | 317 |
| thereof due to affiliated companies | 193 | 1,429 |
| Advanced payments received | 3,682 | 1,413 |
| Total | 59,642 | 155,678 |
| in TEUR | Dec. 31, 2009 | Dec. 31, 2008 |
|---|---|---|
| Liabilities due to banks | 51,686 | 327,678 |
| Loans due to not consolidated affiliated companies |
115 | 314 |
| Loans due to related companies | 0 | 2,274 |
| Loans due to public organization (R&D funds) | 0 | 74 |
| Total | 51,801 | 330,341 |
| in TEUR | Dec. 31, 2009 | Dec. 31, 2008 |
|---|---|---|
| Bank liabilities with a residual term less than 1 year |
35,140 | 13,666 |
| Lease liabilities with a residual term less than 1 year |
10,136 | 40,426 |
| Total | 45,276 | 54,092 |
The liabilities from income taxes basically include liabilities from corporate income taxes and municipal trade earnings taxes (or similar/comparable taxes) in different states, where Group companies have their registered office. The liabilities have developed as follows:
| in TEUR | Dec. 31, 2009 | Dec. 31, 2008 |
|---|---|---|
| Balance as of Jan. 1 of the reporting year | 2,466 | 3,454 |
| Changes in consolidation | -599 | 690 |
| Exchange rate differences | -1 | 1 |
| Use | -436 | -2,894 |
| Release | -36 | -106 |
| Addition | 808 | 1,320 |
| Balance as of Dec. 31 of the reporting year |
2,202 | 2,466 |
| in TEUR | Dec. 31, 2009 | Dec. 31, 2008 |
|---|---|---|
| Provision for vacations | 4,383 | 9,163 |
| Other personnel expenses | 5,934 | 31,859 |
| Losses and risks | 16,483 | 33,752 |
| Other short-term provisions | 14,084 | 59,540 |
| Short-term provisions | 40,884 | 134,314 |
| Liabilities to associated companies | 0 | 57 |
| Other tax liabilities | 7,287 | 20,058 |
| Social security liabilities | 1,057 | 4,268 |
| Other liabilities | 11,740 | 24,015 |
| Government grants within one year | 491 | 880 |
| Deferred charges | 1,071 | 5,564 |
| Total | 62,530 | 189,157 |
The other provisions especially include provisions for warranties as well as pending purchase invoices. The development of the short-term provisions is specified in detail in annex 4 to the notes on the consolidated financial statement.
The allocation of the financial liabilities to the categories according to IAS 39 on the balance sheet date and on the previous balance sheet date can be represented as follows:
| in TEUR | Amortized costs |
Fair value without impact on profit and loss |
Fair value through profit and loss |
Carrying value Dec. 31, 2009 |
Market value Dec. 31, 2009 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Measured at amortized costs | |||||
| Long-term interest bearing financial liabilities |
7,687 | 0 | 0 | 7,687 | 7,687 |
| Short-term interest bearing financial liabilities |
86,941 | 0 | 0 | 86,941 | 86,941 |
| Trade accounts payable | 59,642 | 0 | 0 | 59,642 | 59,642 |
| Other short-term liabilities | 12,953 | 0 | 0 | 12,953 | 12,953 |
| 167,223 | 0 | 0 | 167,223 | 167,223 | |
| Not allocated according IAS 39 (financial lease) |
|||||
| Long-term interest bearing financial liabilities |
4,902 | 0 | 0 | 4,902 | 4,902 |
| Short-term interest bearing financial liabilities |
10,136 | 0 | 0 | 10,136 | 10,136 |
| 15,038 | 0 | 0 | 15,038 | 15,038 | |
| Total | 182,262 | 0 | 0 | 182,262 | 182,262 |
| in TEUR | Amortized costs |
Fair value without impact on profit and loss |
Fair value through profit and loss |
Carrying value Dec. 31, 2008 |
Market value Dec. 31, 2008 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Measured at amortized costs | |||||
| Long-term interest bearing financial liabilities |
33,052 | 0 | 0 | 33,052 | 33,052 |
| Short-term interest bearing financial liabilities |
344,007 | 0 | 0 | 344,007 | 344,007 |
| Trade accounts payable | 155,678 | 0 | 0 | 155,678 | 155,678 |
| Other short-term liabilities | 24,071 | 0 | 0 | 24,071 | 24,071 |
| 556,808 | 0 | 0 | 556,808 | 556,808 | |
| Not allocated according IAS 39 (financial lease) |
|||||
| Long-term interest bearing financial liabilities |
39,011 | 0 | 0 | 39,011 | 39,011 |
| Short-term interest bearing financial liabilities |
40,426 | 0 | 0 | 40,426 | 40,426 |
| 79,437 | 0 | 0 | 79,437 | 79,437 | |
| Total | 636,245 | 0 | 0 | 636,245 | 636,245 |
Trade payables and other liabilities have short-term maturity and so the carrying values accord nearly the residual value. The residual value of the interest bearing liabilities and other financial liabilities were calculated with the cash value of payments in respect to the actual market parameters.
The cash flow statement is represented with the help of the indirect method. The financial resource funds exclusively include the cash and the bank deposits. The income tax payments are separately shown in the cash flow from operating activities.
Interest deposits and interest payments are allocated to the cash flow from operating activities. They can be specified with the following amounts:
| in TEUR | 2009 | 2008 adjusted |
|---|---|---|
| Interest cash in | 776 | 3,741 |
| Interest cash out | -6,681 | -15,080 |
| Total | -5,904 | -11,338 |
The payment of dividends will be shown as part of the financing activities. The effects from modifications of the basis of consolidation were eliminated and are shown in the cash flow from investing activities.
At the beginning of 2009 the proper closing of the Swedish site has been agreed, which has also been closed in 2009. Instead of the liquidation of the company, on January 14, 2010 POLY-TEC Composites Sweden AB has filed for bankruptcy. A provision has been made for foreseeable cost in that context in the current financial statement.
Further events occurring after the balance sheet date, which are of significance for the evaluation on the balance sheet date, such as outstanding legal cases or claims for compensation and other obligations or impending losses, which would have to be posted or disclosed in accordance with IAS 10 (Contingencies and Events occurring after the Balance Sheet Date), have been taken into account in the present consolidated financial statements.
The persisting global financial and economic crisis and the severe slowdown in economic activity posed a huge challenge to POLYTEC Holding AG. The Group's business performance in the year under review was marked by a massive slump in both the passenger car and commercial vehicle segments, which led to considerable declines in sales and earnings. In the year under review, the POLYTEC GROUP posted a negative result after taxes of EUR -90.1 million, including effects from business divisions "held for sale" (for further details about the included one-off expenses please refer to the notes on the consolidated accounts under D. 6 and D. 8).
In light of the current challenging economic situation and the difficulty of predicting the further development of the passenger car and commercial vehicle businesses, the company's future earnings situation and financing requirements might be subject to changes that cannot be estimated with any degree of certainty on the basis of the information currently available. According to current business planning calculations, the PO-LYTEC GROUP is expected to post a positive EBIT in 2010 while the company's liquidity projections show that additional cash and cash equivalents in the amount of EUR 18.5 million will be required; this, however, can be covered within the current financial framework. Furthermore, it should be noted that business planning calculations and the resulting liquidity projections also encompass measures which have not yet been fully agreed upon (sales increase, reduction of personnel costs). Therefore, the final outcome of negotiations will have a significant impact on the future earnings situation and financing requirements of both the group and the individual subsidiaries. The POLYTEC GROUP's business planning calculations have been drawn up by both local management and the Board of Directors to the best of their knowledge and belief on the basis of the information currently available about the development of the passenger car and commercial vehicle segments, which is, however, hard to predict at present. Against the backdrop of widespread uncertainties and negative market sentiment as a result of the global economic downturn, the POLYTEC GROUP cannot fully rule out that the future business development of the group's subsidiaries might be in jeopardy. It is therefore possible that unfavourable impairments of certain balance sheet assets might be recognized in future. In the first two months of 2010, Group results were slightly behind schedule.
Against this background, additional funding to be provided by the Group's main lending bank is deemed to be vital for the survival of POLYTEC Holding AG. As the company's principal creditor, the lending bank has confirmed in writing as of March 9, 2010 that it intends to guarantee additional funding based on the anticipated development of Group operations in line with the original planning calculations and pending approval by the relevant committees by December 31, 2011. Deviations from plan of individual companies or plants of POLYTEC Holding AG alone are not considered a sufficient reason to terminate the financing agreement on the part of the lending bank, provided that the general business development of POLYTEC Holding AG does not fall substantially short of the original planning calculations. In the event of further declines in earnings or of a suspension of funding on the part of the lending bank, the survival of the group would be in jeopardy.
However, based on the current business planning calculations and in light of the additional funding guaranteed by the lending bank, the Board of Directors expects the Group to continue business operations.
Individual companies in the POLYTEC GROUP concluded a factoring agreement for up to EUR 25 million with a German factoring company on September 5, 2008. Provided the receivables are legally valid, the "del credere risk" will be borne by the factoring company. Since the POLYTEC GROUP does not guarantee the recoverability of the receivables, the receivables are derecognized from the consolidated financial statements on the date they are sold to the factoring company in accordance with IAS 39.
Towards the POLYTEC Immobilien Group, there is an existing obligation with regard to a leasing agreement amounting to TEUR 1,500 (previous year: TEUR 1,500). With regard to this, an amount of TEUR 684 (previous year: TEUR 0) was reported on the liabilities side in the present consolidated financial statements because of the closure of the site in Sweden.
Other risks and obligations, which have not been mentioned in the present consolidated accounts or in the explanations concerning the consolidated accounts, are not existent.
In the scope of its business activities, the POLYTEC GROUP is subject to a variety of risks, which are directly related to the corporate transactions. Risk management is an integral part of all business processes of POLYTEC. Also the comprehensive certifications required by a supplier of the automotive industry (e.g. TS ISO/16949:2002) already specify certain regulations, which are also monitored with the help of external audits. Corresponding to the organizational structure of POLYTEC, risks are managed locally and monitored close to the market, especially in the scope of the current business processes. However, the financial risks are mainly controlled by the corporate headquarters. The following basic risk fields can be identified:
Sales market risks: The automotive supplier industry is a market with a very stiff competition, which is also currently facing a quickly proceeding consolidation process. The sales revenue is, in first place, dependent from the acquisition of new orders, which will partially be placed up to two to three years prior to the serial production. In this phase of the order acquisition, each supplier faces a strong competition for the best conditions. During the serial production, the supplier is also dependent from the sales figures of the vehicle for which the supplier provides the components; however, the supplier is not able to influence this success. Furthermore, the suppliers are permanently benchmarked by the OEM even after the start of the serial production, which may result in price demands or, as an extreme example, in the loss of an order. POLYTEC intends to keep the dependency from individual delivery relationships as low as possible with the help of a balanced customer and order mix.
Procurement market risks: One substantial risk is the fluctuation of the raw material prices, which in the case of the POLY-TEC GROUP as a plastic-processing company, will especially be caused by a sustainable change of the oil price, but also by the refinery capacities. On the procuring side, this risk is especially countervailed with long-term delivery agreements and on the part of the sales market, this risk is especially countervailed, as far as enforceable towards the customers, with material fluctuation clauses in the disclosed calculations. In parts, our customers directly negotiate with the supplier with regard to raw material and bought-in parts. As far as prices are only agreed upon on an annual basis with the customer, the change of the raw material prices is an important parameter with regard to the negotiations concerning the annual new determination of the prices. Furthermore, it is intended to use new raw materials (natural fiber) with increased research and development expenses.
Credit risk: Due to the customer structure – more than 90% of the turnover is achieved with OEMs or huge system suppliers – POLYTEC is subject to the credit risk of the automotive industry. However, accounts receivable are critically monitored on a permanent basis, and the payment of accounts receivable according to agreement is ensured. In the financial year 2009, approx. 55% (previous year: 60%) of the turnover was achieved with the three major customers; this results in a certain accumulated credit risk, but this risk is assessed as rather uncritical with regard to non-payments of credits by the management. Being dependent on only a few customers is a basic characteristic of suppliers of the automotive industry. In this context, the "customer" is defined as a group of affiliated companies, which can also produce vehicles of several different brands.
The risk of non-payment in the case of liquid assets is very low, since the contractual partners are exclusively banks with very good creditworthiness.
Despite the credit risk, which is generally classified very low, the maximum theoretical risk of non-payment corresponds to the book values of the individual financial assets and amounts to the following:
| in TEUR | Dec. 31, 2009 | Dec. 31, 2008 |
|---|---|---|
| Loans and receivables | 105,935 | 276,217 |
| At fair value through profit and loss | 0 | 0 |
| Held for trading | 0 | 0 |
| Available for sale | 5,932 | 6,796 |
| Total | 111,867 | 283,013 |
The analysis of the overdue but not impaired trade accounts receivable and of other accounts receivable as of December 31 of the reporting year can be presented as follows:
| Dec. 31, 2009 |
Total | Not overdue and not impaired |
Overdue but not impaired up to 60 days |
60-120 days | 120-360 days |
Longer than 360 days |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trade accounts receivable |
54,976 | 43,795 | 8,464 | 867 | 1,208 | 642 |
| Other accounts receivable |
21,726 | 17,897 | 1,227 | 2,444 | 2 | 157 |
| Dec. 31, 2008 |
Total | Not overdue and not impaired |
Overdue but not impaired up to 60 days |
60-120 days | 120-360 days |
Longer than 360 days |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trade accounts receivable |
146,655 | 121,189 | 20,666 | 2,139 | 2,274 | 386 |
| Other accounts receivable |
40,676 | 37,342 | 658 | 1,050 | 77 | 1,549 |
Liquidity risk: The Group ensures its liquidity by contractual agreements concerning certain credit lines and, if required, by retaining a cash reserve. This is controlled by the company's headquarters. The Group has installed a cash management system for all basic companies of the Group, which can also be used to optimize the net interest result.
The financial liabilities of the Group on the basis of the concluded agreements show the following expected cash flow (including interest payments made with the interest rate on the balance sheet date):
| in TEUR | Carrying value Dec. 31, 2009 |
Total obli gate cash flows |
thereof up to 1 year |
thereof over 1 but less than 5 years |
thereof more than 5 years |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bank loans | 56,648 | 62,188 | 31,212 | 26,810 | 4,167 |
| Bank current accounts | 37,808 | 38,404 | 38,404 | 0 | 0 |
| Financial leases | 15,038 | 15,822 | 9,673 | 6,149 | 0 |
| Trade leases | 59,642 | 59,642 | 59,642 | 0 | 0 |
| Other financial liabilities | 13,125 | 13,125 | 13,125 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 182,262 | 189,181 | 152,056 | 32,958 | 4,167 |
| in TEUR | Carrying value Dec. 31, 2008 |
Total obli gate cash flows |
thereof up to 1 year |
thereof over 1 but less than 5 years |
thereof more than 5 years |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bank loans | 44,348 | 54,414 | 15,998 | 29,090 | 9,325 |
| Bank current accounts | 327,678 | 334,955 | 334,955 | 0 | 0 |
| Financial leases | 79,437 | 87,357 | 44,564 | 34,349 | 8,444 |
| Trade leases | 155,678 | 155,678 | 155,678 | 0 | 0 |
| Other financial liabilities | 29,104 | 29,104 | 28,817 | 68 | 219 |
| Total | 636,245 | 661,507 | 580,012 | 63,506 | 17,989 |
The revolving credits provided to the Group have a contractually agreed residual term of less than one year so that their expected future cash flow has to be shown during this term. However, these credits will normally be prolonged on a 12-month basis so that the aforementioned repatriations cannot be expected. The financial liabilities, which must be reported as current in the balance sheet because of non-compliance with agreed ratios, were presented in the above table in accordance with their anticipated repayment dates and are therefore not all classified as "thereof up to 1 year".
Foreign exchange risk: The predominant part of the turnover of the POLYTEC GROUP is invoiced in euro so that the foreign exchange risk only affects the Group to a very low degree. In parts, the purchase of intermediate inputs is performed with the same currency as the sale of intermediate inputs so that foreign exchange risks are hedged. The Group is subject to higher foreign exchange risks in such countries, in which invoices are written in euro but intermediate inputs have to be purchased with the local currency. Such risks, for example, are existent with regard to Polish zloty. In many cases, these risks cannot be transferred to financial instruments since they must mainly be attributed to personnel costs.
The financial instruments balanced on the balance sheet date show the following distribution with regard to their currency of origin:
| Dec. 31, 2009 | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| in TEUR | In euro | In foreign currency |
Total |
| Investments | 1,195 | 0 | 1,195 |
| Receivables and other assets | 62,951 | 7,934 | 70,884 |
| Loans | 2,000 | 0 | 2,000 |
| Cash in banks | 27,143 | 4,713 | 31,857 |
| Interest rate derivatives | -919 | 0 | -919 |
| Securities | 5,932 | 0 | 5,932 |
| Total | 98,301 | 12,647 | 110,948 |
| in TEUR | In euro | In foreign currency |
Dec. 31, 2009 Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Long-term interest-bearing financial liabilities |
12,039 | 550 | 12,589 |
| Short-term interest-bearing financial liabilities |
95,803 | 1,941 | 97,744 |
| Trade accounts payable | 56,385 | 2,590 | 58,975 |
| Other short-term liabilities | 12,331 | 622 | 12,953 |
| Total | 176,558 | 5,704 | 182,262 |
| Dec. 31, 2009 | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| in TEUR | In euro | In foreign currency |
Total |
| Investments | 8,677 | 0 | 8,677 |
| Receivables and other assets | 154,436 | 17,267 | 171,702 |
| Loans | 2,483 | 0 | 2,483 |
| Cash in bank | 92,015 | 8,753 | 100,768 |
| Interest rate derivatives | -642 | 0 | -642 |
| Securities | 6,796 | 0 | 6,796 |
| Total | 263,765 | 26,020 | 289,785 |
| Dec. 31, 2009 | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| in TEUR | In euro | In foreign currency |
Total |
| Long-term interest-bearing financial liabilities |
71,375 | 688 | 72,063 |
| Short-term interest-bearing financial liabilities |
375,783 | 8,649 | 384,433 |
| Trade accounts payable | 146,564 | 9,113 | 155,678 |
| Other short-term liabilities | 19,890 | 4,182 | 24,071 |
| Total | 613,613 | 22,632 | 636,245 |
The distribution structure shows that the risk the Group is subject to due to the change of exchange rates is very low since both the financial assets held in foreign currency amounting to 11.4% (previous year: 9.0%) and the liabilities amounting to 4.5% (previous year: 3.6%) account for only a minor part of the total volume. Furthermore, a change of a currency would affect both assets and liabilities and thus show compensatory effects.
A 10% increase or decrease in exchange rates has no significant impact on results or equity.
Interest rate change risk: The interest rate change risk is countervailed by POLYTEC with the help of a portfolio of variable and fixed forms of financing corresponding to the long-term interest rate development. Derivative products will be used, if required, for securing the interest rate or for optimizing the net interest result.
The interest-bearing liabilities show the following structure on the balance sheet date:
| in TEUR | Dec. 31, 2009 | Dec. 31, 2008 |
|---|---|---|
| Liabilities to banks | 94,455 | 372,026 |
| thereof with fixed interest rate | 11,701 | 2,986 |
| thereof with variable interest rate | 82,754 | 369,040 |
| Finance leases | 15,038 | 79,437 |
| thereof with fixed interest rate | 15,038 | 78,454 |
| thereof with variable interest rate | 0 | 983 |
| Other liabilities | 172 | 5,033 |
| thereof with fixed interest rate | 172 | 5,033 |
| thereof with variable interest rate | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 109,666 | 456,496 |
| thereof with fixed interest rate | 26,912 | 86,473 |
| thereof with variable interest rate | 82,754 | 370,023 |
The predominant part of the variable interest-bearing liabilities depends on the 3-month EURIBOR. An increase of this reference interest rate by 100 basis points would, on the basis of the contractually agreed remaining terms, result in an increase of the interest expenses by approx. TEUR 660 (previous year: TEUR 3,556).
The following results were achieved from the interest rate swaps held by the Group:
| in TEUR | 2009 | 2008 |
|---|---|---|
| Payments received | -316 | 131 |
| Valuation result | -275 | -779 |
| Total | -591 | -648 |
| Dec. 31, 2009 in TEUR |
Interests | Adjustments | Currency translations |
Income from other securities |
Incomes from other investments |
Investments value adjustments |
Net income |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Loans and receivables | -7,430 | -395 | 495 | 0 | 0 | -19 | -7,350 |
| Financial investments available for sale | 0 | -9,944 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | -9,944 |
| Financial investments held-to-maturity | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| At fair value trough profit and loss | 0 | 0 | 0 | -591 | 0 | 0 | -591 |
| Dec. 31, 2008 in TEUR |
Interests | Adjustments | Currency translations |
Income from other securities |
Incomes from other investments |
Investments value adjustments |
Net income |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Loans and receivables | -12,189 | -2,005 | -1,579 | 0 | 139 | -1,000 | -16,633 |
| Financial investments available for sale | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1,010 | 0 | 0 | 1,010 |
| Financial investments held-to-maturity | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| At fair value trough profit and loss | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Exchange rate change risk: The securities of the current assets (shares) held by the Group are subject to the risk of the change of the stock exchange price. An increase (decrease) of the stock exchange price by 10% would result in an increase (decrease) of the equity capital not affecting the net income by TEUR 593 (previous year: TEUR 680).
Affiliated persons in the sense of IAS 24 are the IMC Verwaltungsgesellschaft mbH, Hörsching, and its affiliated companies in addition to the members of the Board of Directors and of the Supervisory Board. The sole owner and sole manager of the IMC Verwaltungsgesellschaft mbH is the Chairman of the Board of Directors of POLYTEC Holding AG, Mr. Friedrich Huemer.
The following companies of the IMC Group had established business relationships with POLYTEC in the financial year 2009:
The POLYTEC GROUP has long-term leasing agreements with the POLYTEC Immobilien Group with regard to the following properties of the POLYTEC GROUP:
| POLYTEC Holding AG |
Group Headquarter |
|---|---|
| POLYTEC FOR Car Styling GmbH & Co KG |
Plant Hörsching |
| Polytec AVO n.v. |
Plant Schoten |
| Polytec Thermoplast GmbH & Co KG |
Plant Idstein |
| Polytec Riesselmann GmbH & Co KG |
Plants Lohne, Hodenhagen and Wolmirstedt |
| POLYTEC Interior GmbH |
Plants Nordhalben and Ebersdorf |
| POLYTEC Intex GmbH & Co. KG |
Plants Morsbach and Waldbröl |
| Polytec Interior Polska Sp.z.o.o. |
Plant Tomaszow Mazowiecki |
| Polytec Interior Zaragoza S.L. |
Plant Zaragoza |
| Polytec Composites Sweden AB |
Plant Ljungby |
| POLYTEC Composites Germany GmbH & Co KG |
Plants Gochsheim, Cornberg and Voerde |
| POLYTEC Composites Slovakia s.r.o. |
Plant Sladkovicovo |
| POLYTEC Elastoform GmbH & Co KG |
Plant Marchtrenk |
| POLYTEC THELEN GmbH |
Plant Bochum |
The rental expenses from the rental contracts in the financial year amounted to approx. EUR 9.2 million (previous year: EUR 8.7 million).
The rental contracts can be terminated by complying with a period of notice of six up to twelve months, but longer waivers of entitlement to terminate the contract have also been agreed in some cases. The lease rental charges, which are existent due to the fixed period of notice or due to longer waivers of entitlement to terminate the contract, amount to TEUR 35,709 (previous year: TEUR 22,693) on December 31, 2009 and are due as follows:
| in TEUR | Dec. 31, 2009 | Dec. 31, 2008 |
|---|---|---|
| Within one year | 8,829 | 7,936 |
| Longer than one year within five years | 21,347 | 7,378 |
| Over five years | 5,534 | 7,378 |
For all properties, the POLYTEC GROUP was granted certain sales options by the lessor.
Loans were issued to a company of the Polytec Immobilien Group, which are balanced under "Loans" in the financial assets. The loans will be charged with interests at arm's length and can be repaid at latest until December 31, 2018. Further information can be found in section D. 15.
All transactions were carried out at normal market rates. There are neither provisions for doubtful debts nor were expenses for doubtful or unrecoverable debts recorded in 2009 in connection with transactions with affiliated parties.
Other business relationships
The POLYTEC GROUP has a contract for work and labor with the IMC Verwaltungsgesellschaft mbH, Hörsching, concerning the provision of a member of the Board of Directors of the PO-LYTEC Holding AG, Hörsching.
The PPI Plastics Products Innovation GmbH & Co KG functions as supplier of injection moulding products for the POLYTEC GROUP.
GLOBE AIR AG provided transport services to employees of the POLYTEC GROUP in the business year under review.
Total remuneration of the members of the Board of Directors in the year under review amounted to TEUR 1,948 (previous year: TEUR 1,610). Of the figure quoted, TEUR 32 (previous year: TEUR 193) was not spent by the company itself but by its affiliated companies. Furthermore, benefits in kind in the form of company cars and cellular phones were received by these executives.
The 2009 emoluments contain a one-off payment to a member of the Board of Directors amounting to TEUR 675, who left as a result of the POLYTEC restructuring.
In 2009, the Chairman of the Board of Directors waived 20% of the fixed salary, to which he was entitled, as a contribution to dealing with the POLYTEC GROUP's difficult situation.
Not yet paid variable portions of salary affecting the year 2009 are balanced in the short-term personnel reserves.
There are no stock-option plans or similar shareholding-based remunerations falling under IFRS 2.
The recorded expenses for payments to members of the Supervisory Board in the financial year amounted to EUR 101,750 (previous year: TEUR 74).
In addition consultancy contracts with two members of the Supervisory Board were agreed at common market terms.
There are no credits or advanced payments with regard to current or former members of the organs of the company. No former member of the organs of the company receives any kind of salary from the Group or one of its affiliated companies.
Expenses for the services provided by the Group auditors are as follows in 2009:
| in TEUR | 2009 |
|---|---|
| Annual financial statements | 90 |
| Other services | 221 |
| 311 |
The persons mentioned below were members of Board of Directors during the financial year and at the time of the preparation of the consolidated accounts:
Friedrich Huemer Wallern (Chairman of the Board of Directors)
Gröbming (since November 2, 2009)
Alfred Kollros
St. Valentin
Brunn am Gebirge (between March 1, 2009 and August 8, 2009)
Leonding (since October 15, 2009)
Karl-Heinz Solly Leonding (up to December 31, 2009)
Maxhütte-Haidhof, Germany (up to March 1, 2009)
The persons mentioned below were members of the Supervisory Board during the financial year and at the time of the preparation of the consolidated accounts:
Thalheim (Chairman)
Knittelsheim, Germany (Vice Chairman)
Starnberg, Germany
Vienna
Linz (since February 8, 2010)
Leonding (since February 8, 2010)
Linz (up to February 8, 2010)
The Board of Directors of POLYTEC Holding AG authorized the consolidated financial statements for transmission to the Supervisory Board on March 31, 2010.
Hörsching, April 6, 2010
Friedrich Huemer m.p. Alfred Kollros m.p.
Eduard Schreiner m.p. Andreas Jagl m.p.
| Automotive Systems | Automotive Composites | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| in TEUR | 2009 | 2008 | 2009 | 2008 | 2009 |
| Net sales (not consolidated) | 440,566 | 455,104 | 170,017 | 307,478 | 72,495 |
| thereof: | |||||
| Internal sales own division | 70,634 | 62,597 | 13,757 | 28,352 | 7,941 |
| Internal sales other divisions | 265 | 106 | 0 | 1,222 | 212 |
| External sales | 369,667 | 392,402 | 156,260 | 277,904 | 64,342 |
| EBITDA | 1,364 | 3,466 | 547 | 32,664 | 5,099 |
| Depreciation and amortization | 18,912 | 17,818 | 6,637 | 6,994 | 2,015 |
| Impairments | 3,965 | 6,841 | 0 | 1,331 | 0 |
| thereof goodwill | 0 | 6,312 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Material earnings positions | |||||
| Income from reversal of provisions for liabilities | 1,762 | 3,415 | 4,619 | 6,379 | 375 |
| Deconsolidation gains | 0 | 0 | 3,434 | 0 | 0 |
| Operating profit (EBIT) before cost of restructuring |
-21,512 | -21,193 | -6,090 | 24,339 | 3,084 |
| Cost of restructuring | -2,182 | 0 | -1,744 | 0 | 0 |
| Operating profit (EBIT) after cost of restructuring |
-23,694 | -21,193 | -7,834 | 24,339 | 3,084 |
| Financial expenses | -3,543 | -3,256 | -1,821 | -1,937 | -437 |
| Impairments | |||||
| Other finacial results | 0 | 2 | -64 | -1,000 | 0 |
| Taxes on income | 5,720 | 371 | -3,060 | -7,003 | -530 |
| Net profit of continued operations | -21,517 | -24,075 | -12,780 | 14,399 | 2,118 |
| Operating assets | 148,791 | 715,105 | 74,676 | 105,353 | 38,148 |
| Operating liabilities | 71,654 | 277,585 | 46,006 | 62,246 | 7,285 |
| Capital employed | 77,137 | 437,519 | 28,670 | 43,108 | 30,863 |
| thereof: | |||||
| Deferred taxes | 3,605 | 6,502 | 2,000 | 5,539 | 384 |
| Employee benefit obligations | 8,467 | 11,119 | 15,379 | 15,224 | 1,219 |
| Investments in continued operations | 18,000 | 27,932 | 1,582 | 5,956 | 594 |
| Other non-cash revenues (+)/expenses (–) | -3,062 | 1,617 | -1,480 | -725 | 86 |
| External sales | Deferred tax assets | Obligations for employees | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| in TEUR | 2009 | 2008 | 2009 | 2008 | 2009 | 2008 |
| Austria | 32,838 | 48,367 | 9,261 | 10,594 | 1,774 | 1,885 |
| Germany | 404,356 | 492,936 | 4,390 | 7,048 | 22,322 | 24,686 |
| Other EU | 136,735 | 178,895 | 324 | 3,925 | 1,405 | 1,569 |
| Rest of the world | 33,118 | 48,084 | 0 | 1,057 | 160 | 125 |
| Total Group | 607,047 | 768,282 | 13,974 | 22,624 | 25,661 | 28,264 |
| Group | Consolidation | Other segments | Car Styling | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 | 2009 | 2008 | 2009 | 2008 | 2009 | 2008 |
| 870,919 | 700,702 | 0 | 0 | 21,116 | 17,625 | 87,221 |
| 101,203 | 93,177 | 0 | 0 | 767 | 845 | 9,487 |
| 1,434 | 478 | 0 | 0 | 98 | 1 | 8 |
| 768,282 | 607,047 | 0 | 0 | 20,251 | 16,778 | 77,726 |
| 50,184 | 10,221 | 270 | -65 | 4,888 | 3,276 | 8,897 |
| 28,139 | 28,671 | 0 | 0 | 1,225 | 1,107 | 2,101 |
| 8,172 | 3,965 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 10,975 | 7,442 | 0 | 0 | 1,132 | 687 | 48 |
| 3,434 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| -22,415 | 270 | -65 | 3,663 | 2,168 | 6,795 | |
| -7,822 | 0 | 0 | 0 | -3,896 | 0 | |
| -30,236 | 270 | -65 | 3,663 | -1,728 | 6,795 | |
| -6,158 | -6,884 | -103 | 1,594 | -149 | -2,678 | -713 |
| -9,944 | -9,944 | |||||
| -568 | 7,332 | 255 | -6,304 | -759 | 0 | |
| -3,796 | -293 | -3,478 | 10,613 | -2,447 | -1,646 | |
| -51,429 | 7,206 | -1,695 | 7,823 | -17,555 | 4,436 | |
| 879,460 | 277,028 | -4,021 | -391 | 19,141 | 15,804 | 43,882 |
| 353,022 | 130,158 | -4,065 | -564 | 8,439 | 5,777 | 8,818 |
| 526,438 | 146,870 | 44 | 173 | 10,703 | 10,028 | 35,065 |
| 22,624 | 13,974 | -849 | -804 | 10,990 | 8,789 | 442 |
| 28,264 | 25,661 | -208 | -25 | 825 | 621 | 1,305 |
| 39,025 | 20,569 | 0 | 0 | 1,176 | 392 | 3,961 |
| -4,464 | 61 | -183 | -97 | 175 | -527 | |
| in TEUR | Balance as of | Changes in | Translation | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan. 1, 2009 | consolidation | differences | Additions | Disposals | |
| I. Intangible assets |
|||||
| 1. Research and development costs | 9,878 | -2,104 | 0 | 0 | 6,766 |
| 2. Rights | 21,057 | -11,291 | 59 | 550 | 1,063 |
| 3. Goodwill | 45,627 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 4. Customer contracts | 79,933 | -79,933 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 156,496 | -93,328 | 59 | 550 | 7,829 | |
| II. Tangible assets |
|||||
| 1. Land and buildings | 170,266 | -159,439 | 309 | 797 | 95 |
| 2. Technical equipment and machinery | 609,943 | -418,135 | 4,978 | 17,048 | 9,871 |
| 3. Other equipment, fixtures, fittings and eqipment | 69,710 | -23,766 | 625 | 3,224 | 2,355 |
| 4. Advance payments made and assets under construction |
37,386 | -18,750 | 171 | 14,547 | 775 |
| 887,304 | -620,090 | 6,083 | 35,616 | 13,096 | |
| III. Financial assets |
|||||
| 1. Investments in affiliated companies | 296 | -41 | 0 | 35 | 0 |
| 2. Investments in associated companies | 1,031 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 3. Investments in joint ventures | 7,414 | -7,759 | 0 | 345 | 0 |
| 4. Other investments | 874 | -5 | 0 | 13 | 0 |
| 5. Loans | 2,483 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 483 |
| 6. Fixed asset securities | 62 | -60 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 12,160 | -7,865 | 0 | 393 | 483 | |
| 1,055,960 | -721,283 | 6,142 | 36,560 | 21,409 |
| in TEUR | Balance as of Jan. 1, 2008 |
Changes in consolidation |
Translation differences |
Additions | Disposals |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| I. Intangible assets |
|||||
| 1. Research and development costs | 4,903 | 2,440 | 0 | 3,043 | 508 |
| 2. Rights | 10,344 | 9,658 | -75 | 1,570 | 822 |
| 3. Goodwill | 45,627 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 4. Customer contracts | 0 | 79,933 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 60,874 | 92,031 | -75 | 4,613 | 1,330 | |
| II. Tangible assets |
|||||
| 1. Land and buildings | 10,814 | 157,962 | -525 | 1,947 | 490 |
| 2. Technical equipment and machinery | 189,372 | 390,484 | -2,705 | 23,653 | 8,524 |
| 3. Other equipment, fixtures, fittings and eqipment | 47,544 | 19,244 | -1,497 | 8,280 | 5,092 |
| 4. Advance payments made and assets under construction |
7,304 | 41,828 | -80 | 15,665 | 7,497 |
| 255,034 | 609,518 | -4,807 | 49,545 | 21,603 | |
| III. Financial assets |
|||||
| 1. Investments in affiliated companies | 195 | 51 | 0 | 51 | 0 |
| 2. Investments in associated companies | 1,045 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 14 |
| 3. Investments in joint ventures | 0 | 7,057 | 0 | 357 | 0 |
| 4. Other investments | 770 | 5 | 0 | 99 | 0 |
| 5. Loans | 2,250 | 0 | 0 | 1,575 | 1,342 |
| 6. Fixed asset securities | 2 | 0 | 0 | 60 | 0 |
| 4,262 | 7,113 | 0 | 2,142 | 1,356 | |
| 320,169 | 708,662 | -4,882 | 56,300 | 24,289 |
| Cost of acquisition and production | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net book value as of Dec. 31, 2008 |
Net book value as of Dec. 31, 2009 |
Accumulated depreciation |
thereof extraordinary | Depreciation of the fiscal year |
Balance as of Dec. 31, 2009 |
Transfers |
| 8,794 | 105 | 904 | 0 | 74 | 1,008 | 0 |
| 5,990 | 1,870 | 7,814 | 0 | 1,301 | 9,684 | 371 |
| 19,300 | 19,300 | 26,328 | 0 | 0 | 45,627 | 0 |
| 5,774 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 39,858 | 21,274 | 35,045 | 0 | 1,375 | 56,319 | 371 |
| 134,097 | 6,924 | 5,903 | 0 | 837 | 12,827 | 988 |
| 277,005 | 80,696 | 148,098 | 3,965 | 25,648 | 228,794 | 24,831 |
| 25,951 | 14,113 | 35,248 | 0 | 4,752 | 49,361 | 1,923 |
| 37,386 | 4,442 | 23 | 0 | 23 | 4,465 | -28,113 |
| 474,439 | 106,176 | 189,270 | 3,965 | 31,260 | 295,447 | -371 |
| 296 | 290 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 290 | 0 |
| 31 | 31 | 1,000 | 0 | 0 | 1,031 | 0 |
| 7,414 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 874 | 872 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 882 | 0 |
| 2,483 | 2,000 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2,000 | 0 |
| 62 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 |
| 11,160 | 3,195 | 1,010 | 10 | 10 | 4,205 | 0 |
| 525,456 | 130,645 | 225,326 | 3,975 | 32,646 | 355,971 | 0 |
| Cost of acquisition and production | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net book value as of Dec. 31, 2007 |
Net book value as of Dec. 31, 2008 |
Accumulated depreciation |
thereof extraordinary | Depreciation of the fiscal year |
Balance as of Dec. 31, 2009 |
Transfers |
| 4,375 | 8,794 | 1,084 | 0 | 556 | 9,878 | 0 |
| 3,676 | 5,990 | 15,067 | 0 | 1,854 | 21,057 | 382 |
| 25,612 | 19,300 | 26,328 | 6,312 | 6,312 | 45,627 | 0 |
| 0 | 5,774 | 74,159 | 0 | 1,157 | 79,933 | 0 |
| 33,662 | 39,858 | 116,638 | 6,312 | 9,879 | 156,496 | 382 |
| 6,961 | 134,097 | 36,169 | 0 | 1,981 | 170,266 | 557 |
| 78,171 | 277,005 | 332,938 | 1,860 | 30,244 | 609,943 | 17,664 |
| 15,286 | 25,951 | 43,759 | 0 | 6,190 | 69,710 | 1,232 |
| 7,304 | 37,386 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 37,386 | -19,835 |
| 107,722 | 474,439 | 412,866 | 1,860 | 38,415 | 887,304 | -382 |
| 195 | 296 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 296 | 0 |
| 1,045 | 31 | 1,000 | 1,000 | 1,000 | 1,031 | 0 |
| 0 | 7,414 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7,414 | 0 |
| 770 | 874 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 874 | 0 |
| 2,250 | 2,483 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2,483 | 0 |
| 62 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 62 | 0 | |
| 4,262 | 11,160 | 1,000 | 1,000 | 1,000 | 12,160 | 0 |
| 145,646 | 525,456 | 530,504 | 9,172 | 49,294 | 1,055,960 | 0 |
| in TEUR | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Present value of severance payments (DBO) as of Jan. 1 | 1,921 | 1,743 | 1,947 | 1,925 | 1,355 |
| Service cost | 129 | 124 | 162 | 179 | 148 |
| Interest cost | 99 | 91 | 87 | 80 | 68 |
| Severance payments | -329 | -98 | -179 | -126 | -89 |
| Realized actuarial profit/loss | -182 | 61 | -275 | -111 | 444 |
| Present value of severance payments (DBO) as of Dec. 31 | 1,638 | 1,921 | 1,743 | 1,947 | 1,925 |
| Unrealized actuarial profit/loss | -25 | -208 | -147 | -435 | -567 |
| Provisions for severance payments as of Dec. 31 | 1,613 | 1,713 | 1,597 | 1,512 | 1,358 |
| in TEUR | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Present value of pensions (DBO) as of Jan. 1 | 21,459 | 20,653 | 7,148 | 6,588 | 5,635 |
| Reclassification | -2,244 | 2,306 | 13,752 | 0 | 0 |
| Service cost | 962 | 586 | 327 | 284 | 446 |
| Interest cost | 1,187 | 213 | 727 | 265 | 251 |
| Pensions payments | -888 | -1,217 | -630 | -169 | -157 |
| Realized actuarial profit/loss | -121 | -1,082 | -670 | 180 | 413 |
| Present value of pensions (DBO) as of Dec. 31 | 20,355 | 21,459 | 20,653 | 7,148 | 6,588 |
| Unrealized actuarial profit/loss | 856 | 1,108 | 165 | -619 | -413 |
| Provisions for pensions as of Dec. 31 | 21,211 | 22,566 | 20,818 | 6,529 | 6,175 |
| in TEUR | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Present value of performance orientated obligations | 1,272 | 2,291 | 1,155 | 818 | 820 |
| Realized actuarial profit/loss | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Provisions for jubilee payments | 1,272 | 2,291 | 1,155 | 818 | 820 |
| in TEUR | Balance as of Jan. 1, 2009 |
Changes in consolidation |
Currency translation |
Utilization | Release | Addition | Balance as of Dec. 31, 2009 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Provisions for vacation | 9,163 | -2,952 | 33 | 5,486 | 0 | 3,625 | 4,383 |
| Other short-term personal expenses | 31,859 | -21,877 | 14 | 3,148 | 2,942 | 2,029 | 5,934 |
| Provisions for anticipated losses and risks |
33,752 | -8,188 | 44 | 11,282 | 2,808 | 4,964 | 16,483 |
| Provisions | 59,540 | -43,837 | 8 | 9,660 | 1,692 | 9,725 | 14,084 |
| 134,314 | -76,854 | 99 | 29,575 | 7,442 | 20,342 | 40,884 |
| Company | Location | Country | Parent company | Direct and indirect share % |
Type of consolidation1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| POLYTEC Automotive Systems GmbH | Hörsching | AUT | POLYTEC Holding AG | 100.0 | KO |
| POLYTEC Invest GmbH | Geretsried | GER | POLYTEC Holding AG | 100.0 | KV |
| PF Beteiligungs GmbH | Hörsching | AUT | POLYTEC Holding AG | 100.0 | KO |
| Car Styling Division | |||||
| POLYTEC FOR Car Styling GmbH & Co KG | Hörsching | AUT | POLYTEC Holding AG | 100.0 | KV |
| POLYTEC FOR Car Styling GmbH | Hörsching | AUT | POLYTEC Holding AG | 100.0 | KO |
| Polytec Holden Ltd. | Bromyard | GBR | POLYTEC Holding AG | 100.0 | KV |
| POLYTEC FOHA CORPORATION | Markham | CAN | POLYTEC Holding AG | 80.0 | KV |
| Polytec Foha Inc. | Warren | USA | POLYTEC Holding AG | 80.0 | KV |
| Polytec AVO n.v. | Schoten | BEL | POLYTEC Holding AG | 100.0 | KV |
| Ratipur Kraftfahrzeugbauteile und Autoausstattung Herstellungs- und Vertriebsgesellschaft m.b.H. |
Komló | HUN | POLYTEC Holding AG | 24.0 | KOE |
| Automotive Systems Division | |||||
| Polytec Holding Deutschland GmbH | Geretsried | GER | POLYTEC Holding AG | 100.0 | KV |
| POLYTEC Interior GmbH | Geretsried | GER | Polytec Holding Deutschland GmbH | 100.0 | KV |
| Polytec Automotive GmbH & Co KG | Geretsried | GER | Polytec Holding Deutschland GmbH | 100.0 | KV |
| Polytec Automotive Verwaltungs GmbH | Geretsried | GER | Polytec Holding Deutschland GmbH | 100.0 | KO |
| Polytec Deutschland Verwaltungs GmbH | Lohne | GER | Polytec Holding Deutschland GmbH | 100.0 | KO |
| Polytec Riesselmann GmbH & Co KG | Lohne | GER | Polytec Holding Deutschland GmbH | 100.0 | KV |
| POLYTEC Intex GmbH & Co. KG | Morsbach | GER | Polytec Holding Deutschland GmbH | 100.0 | KV |
| POLYTEC Intex Montage GmbH | Morsbach | GER | POLYTEC Intex GmbH & Co. KG | 100.0 | KO |
| Polytec Thermoplast GmbH & Co KG | Idstein | GER | Polytec Holding Deutschland GmbH | 100.0 | KV |
| Polytec Interior UK Ltd. | Birmingham | GBR | POLYTEC Interior GmbH | 100.0 | KO |
| Polytec Interior Zaragoza S.L. | Zaragoza | ESP | POLYTEC Holding AG | 100.0 | KV |
| Polytec Interior Polska Sp.z.o.o. | Tomaszow Mazowiecki | POL | POLYTEC Holding AG | 100.0 | KV |
| Polytec Interior South Africa (Proprietary) Ltd. | Rosslyn | SAF | Polytec Holding Deutschland GmbH | 100.0 | KV |
| PDN Real Estate GmbH | Bötzingen | GER | Polytec Holding Deutschland GmbH | 100.0 | KO |
| Automotive Composites Division | |||||
| PT Beteiligungs GmbH | Hörsching | AUT | POLYTEC Holding AG | 100.0 | KV |
| POLYTEC Composites Italia S.r.l. | Mondovì | ITA | POLYTEC Holding AG | 100.0 | KV |
| POLYTEC Composites Beteiligungs GmbH | Gochsheim | GER | PT Beteiligungs GmbH | 100.0 | KV |
| POLYTEC Composites Verwaltungs GmbH | Gochsheim | GER | PT Beteiligungs GmbH | 100.0 | KO |
| POLYTEC Composites Germany GmbH & Co KG | Gochsheim | GER | POLYTEC Composites Beteiligungs GmbH | 100.0 | KV |
| POLYTEC Composites Slovakia s.r.o. | Sladkovicovo | SLK | PT Beteiligungs GmbH | 100.0 | KV |
| PT Plastik Ürünleri Sanayi ve Ticaret A.S. | Aksaray | TK | PT Beteiligungs GmbH | 100.0 | KV |
| Polytec Composites Bohemia s.r.o. | Chodova Plana | CZE | PT Beteiligungs GmbH | 100.0 | KV |
| POLYTEC Composites Weiden GmbH | Weiden | GER | POLYTEC Composites Beteiligungs GmbH | 100.0 | KV |
| INAPAL PLASTICOS, S.A. | Leca do Balio | POR | POLYTEC Composites Germany GmbH & Co KG | 19.7 | KOE |
| Ljungby Komposit AB | Ljungby | SWE | PT Beteiligungs GmbH | 25.0 | KOE |
| Industrial Division | |||||
| POLYTEC Industrial Plastics GmbH | Bochum | GER | POLYTEC Holding AG | 70.0 | KV |
| POLYTEC Elastoform GmbH & Co KG | Marchtrenk | AUT | POLYTEC Industrial Plastics GmbH | 70.0 | KV |
| POLYTEC EMC Engineering GmbH & Co KG | Marchtrenk | AUT | POLYTEC Industrial Plastics GmbH | 70.0 | KV |
| POLYTEC EMC Engineering GmbH | Hörsching | AUT | POLYTEC Industrial Plastics GmbH | 70.0 | KO |
| POLYTEC THELEN GmbH | Bochum | GER | POLYTEC Industrial Plastics GmbH | 70.0 | KV |
1) KV = fully consolidated
KE = consolidated at equity
KO = not consolidated due to subordinated importance
KOE = no valuation at equity due to subordinated importance
According to clause 82 Section 4 pt. 3 BörseG
We confirm to the best of our knowledge that the consolidated financial statements give a true and fair view of the assets, liabilities, financial position and profit or loss of the group as required by the applicable accounting standards and that the group management report gives a true and fair view of the development and performance of the business and the position of the group, together with a description of the principal risks and uncertainties the group faces.
Hörsching, April 6, 2010
The Board of Directors
Friedrich Huemer m.p. Alfred Kollros m.p. Eduard Schreiner m.p. Andreas Jagl m.p.
We have audited the accompanying consolidated financial statements of POLYTEC Holding AG, Hörsching, for the fiscal year from January 1, 2009 to December 31, 2009. These consolidated financial statements comprise the consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2009, the consolidated income statement, the consolidated cash flow statement and the consolidated statement of changes in equity for the year ended December 31, 2009 and a summary of significant accounting policies and other explanatory notes.
The company's management is responsible for the Group accounting system and for the preparation and fair presentation of these consolidated financial statements in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) as adopted by the EU. This responsibility includes: designing, implementing and maintaining internal control relevant to the preparation and fair presentation of financial statements that are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error; selecting and applying appropriate accounting policies; and making accounting estimates that are reasonable in the circumstances.
Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audit. We conducted our audit in accordance with laws and regulations applicable in Austria and Austrian Standards on Auditing, as well as in accordance with International Standards on Auditing issued by the International Auditing (ISA) and Assurance Standards Board (IAASB) of the International Federation of Accountants (IFAC). Those standards require that we comply with professional guidelines and plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance whether the consolidated financial statements are free from material misstatement.
An audit involves performing procedures to obtain audit evidence about the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements. The procedures selected depend on the auditor's judgment, including the assessment of the risks of material misstatement of the consolidated financial statements, whether due to fraud or error. In making those risk assessments, the auditor considers internal control relevant to the Group's preparation and fair presentation of the consolidated financial statements in order to design audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Group's internal control. An audit also includes evaluating the appropriateness of accounting policies used and the reasonableness of accounting estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the consolidated financial statements.
We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our audit opinion.
Our audit did not give rise to any objections. In our opinion, which is based on the results of our audit, the consolidated financial statements comply with legal requirements and give a true and fair view of the financial position of the Group as of December 31, 2009 and of its financial performance and its cash flows for the fiscal year from January 1, 2009 to December 31, 2009, in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) as adopted by the EU.
Without qualifying our opinion, we draw attention to the fact that both the future development and going concern are uncertain and are largely contingent on securing further funding as well as on future business trends as anticipated by the Board of Directors to the best of their knowledge on the basis of current information.
In light of the current challenging economic situation and the difficulty of predicting the further development of the passenger car and commercial vehicle businesses, we would like to stress the fact – as pointed out by the Board of Directors in the notes to the consolidated accounts and in the Group managment report – that the company's future earnings situation and financing requirements might be subject to changes that cannot be estimated with any degree of certainty on the basis of the information currently available. It cannot be fully ruled out that going concern of subsidiaries of the Group might be in jeopardy. Therefore unfavorable future impairments of balance sheet assets (including deferred taxes) are possible. Furthermore, it should be noted that business planning calculations and the resulting liquidity projections also encompass measures, which have not yet been agreed upon (sales increase, reduction of personnel costs). The final outcome of these negotiations could have a significant impact on the future earnings situation and financing requirements of the Group.
The company's principal creditor, the lending bank, has confirmed in writing as of March 9, 2010 that it intends to keep the financing agreement – subject to approval by the relevant committee even until December 31, 2011 – if the development of Group operations is in line with the original planning calculations as of November 27, 2009. The lending bank will not consider negative deviations from planning calculations of individual companies and/or sites of the Group alone as a sufficient reason to terminate the financing agreement, provided that the business development of the Group as a whole does not fall substantially short of the original planning calculations as of November 27, 2009.
With regard to this supplemental information, please also refer to the description of group financing and going concern in the notes on the consolidated accounts (E. 5) and in the Group management report (p. 56f.).
Pursuant to statutory provisions, the management report for the Group is to be audited as to whether it is consistent with the consolidated financial statements and as to whether the other disclosures are not misleading with respect to the company's position. The auditor's report also has to contain a statement as to whether the management report for the Group is consistent with the consolidated financial statements and whether the disclosures pursuant to article 243a UGB (Austrian Commercial Code) are appropriate.
In our opinion, the consolidated management report for the Group is consistent with the consolidated financial statements. The disclosures according to article 243a UGB (Austrian Commercial Code) are appropriate.
Leonding, March 31, 2010
Deloitte Oberösterreich Wirtschaftsprüfungs GmbH
Nikolaus Schaffer ppa. m.p. Austrian Chartered Accountant
Ulrich Dollinger m.p. Austrian Chartered Accountant
1.
Die weltwirtschaftliche Entwicklung 2009 war von der st‰rksten Rezession seit dem Ende des Zweiten Weltkriegs gepr‰gt. In nahezu allen Regionen ging das reale Bruttoinlandsprodukt infolge der globalen Finanz- und Wirtschaftskrise zur¸ck ñ besonders stark in den Industriel‰ndern (ñ3,6 %). Das globale Bruttoinlandsprodukt verringerte sich im Vergleich zum Vorjahr sp¸rbar um 2,3 %. Nach dem Konjunktureinbruch Ende 2008 konnte mitBeginn der zweiten Jahrsh‰lfte ein Umschwung der Entwicklung verzeichnet werden. Dies war vor allem auf wiederkehrende Wachstumsimpulse aus Asien zur¸ckzuf¸hren.
Im Jahr 2009 war die Entwicklung der Weltwirtschaft durch den Einbruch des internationalen Handels und einen starken R¸ckgang der G¸ternachfrage gekennzeichnet. Die Rezession traf neben allen Industriel‰ndern auch aufstrebende Schwellenl‰nder. Besonders exportabh‰ngige Volkswirtschaften waren betroffen. Mit Hilfe konzertierter Aktionen seitens nationaler Notenbanken und Regierungen konnten die globalen Finanzm‰rkte teilweise stabilisiert werden. Verst‰rkte fiskalpolitische Maflnahmen in Form von Konjunkturprogrammen halfen, den Wirtschaftsabschwung im Verlauf des Jahres zu mildern. Europa
befand sich im Jahr 2009 in einer tiefen Rezession, die bereits im zweiten Halbjahr 2008 begonnen hatte. Gr¸nde f¸r den Abschwung waren die Finanzkrise und die folgliche Zur¸ckhaltung beim Konsum und bei der Investitionst‰tigkeit, der Lagerabbau sowie Exporteinbuflen. Im Gegensatz zum Vorjahr ging das Wachstum des Bruttoinlandsprodukts in der Europ‰ischen Union stark zur¸ck (2008: +0,8 %; 2009: ñ4,1 %). Erst im zweiten Halbjahr 2009 haben viele Unternehmen begonnen, ihre in der ersten Jahresh‰lfte abgebauten Lagerbest‰nde aufzustocken, wodurch die bis dahin sehr niedrige Kapazit‰tsauslastung in der Industrie teilweise wieder
stieg. Staatliche Konjunkturprogramme zeigten Wirkung; sie st¸tzten den privaten und staatlichen Konsum. BRANCHENSITUATION:
Die problematische Entwicklung der Weltwirtschaft 2009 infolge der Krise auf den internationalen Finanzm‰rkten hat auch zu einem starken R¸ckgang der Automobilabsatzzahlen in den wichtigsten M‰rkten gef¸hrt. Allein die europ‰ische Fahrzeugproduktion ging von 18,5 Millionen auf 15 Millionen Einheiten zur¸ck.
(in tsd. Einheiten)
Die wichtigsten Kunden des Konzerns mussten daher aufgrund der dramatisch r¸ckl‰ufigen Neuzulassungen in 2009 teilweise sehr deutliche Umsatzr¸ckg‰nge hinnehmen. Im Zuliefererbereich sank gem‰fl einer Studie der
Unternehmensberatung Roland Berger der Umsatz der Zulieferer global um etwa 25 %. Von staatlicher Seite wurden diese R¸ckg‰nge unter anderem durch die Einf¸hrung
der Abwrackpr‰mie verringert, die aber vor allem den Herstellern von kleineren Fahrzeugen zugute kam und daher auf den Konzern, mit seiner Ausrichtung auf Premium-Hersteller, nur geringe Auswirkung hatte. Im Premium-Bereich wird f¸rdie nahe Zukunft daher inzwischen auch von einem
Nachholbedarf bei den Absatzzahlen ausgegangen, w‰hrend die Abs‰tze der kleineren Fahrzeuge wahrscheinlich unter dem Auslaufen der Abwrackpr‰mie leiden werden. Grunds‰tzlich geht der Markttrend im Automobilbereich hin zu leichter,
umweltfreundlicher und hˆherwertiger Ausstattung sowie Individualisierung. Diese Trends kommen dem Konzern mitseinem auf Gewichtsreduktion ausgelegten Produktportfolio und seiner Erfahrung im Premium-Bereich entgegen. In das laufende Jahr 2010 sind die deutschen Hersteller mit Zuw‰chsen gestartet. GESCHƒFTSENTWICKLUNG
Die zwischen Unternehmen und Banken getroffene, und im Zuge einer auflerordentlichen Hauptversammlung am 26. Juni 2009 einstimmig beschlossene Restrukturierungsvereinbarung der POLYTEC GROUP sah unter anderem vor, dass die im Gesch‰ftsjahr 2008 erworbene PEGUFORM GROUP mit Ausnahme jener beiden Standorte (Weiden und Chodova Plana), die der Automotive Composites Division zuzurechnen sind, abzugeben ist. Somit ist die PEGUFORM GROUP, mit Ausnahme der beiden Standorte gem‰fl IFRS 5 als ÑZur Ver‰uflerung gehaltenì zu klassifizieren und aus der Automotive Systems Division auszugliedern.
Bei der Betrachtung der Umsatz- und Ertragsentwicklung des Konzerns und jener der Automotive System Division ist in Folge zu beachten, dass die im Anhang unter D.10 beschriebene ÑAbgabe der PEGUFORM GROUPì einen nur eingeschr‰nkten Vergleich mit dem gepr¸ften Konzernabschluss 2008 zul‰sst. F¸r eine bessere Einsch‰tzung und Beurteilung der jeweiligen Ergebnisentwicklung
wurden die entsprechenden Darstellungen um eine um die Akquisition bereinigte Darstellung 2008 erg‰nzt.
Alle im folgenden Text angegebenen Werte des Gesch‰ftsjahres 2009 sind bereinigt um die per 1. Juli 2009 entkonsolidierten Gesellschaften der PEGUFORM GROUP, deren Ergebnisbeitrag als Ergebnis aus aufgegebenen Gesch‰ftsbereichen ausgewiesen wird, dargestellt. GESCHƒFTSENTWICKLUNG
Als Konsequenz der infolge der Wirtschaftskrise stark reduzierten Produktionszahlen sowohl bei Pkw alsauch den schweren Lkw und Nutzfahrzeugen reduzierte sich der Umsatz des Konzerns um 21,0 % auf EUR 607,0 Mio., wobei die beiden Werke der ehemaligen PEGUFORM GROUP - nunmehr gef¸hrt als POLYTEC Composites Bohemia sowie POLYTEC Composites Weiden - mit rund EUR 34 Mio. zum Konzernumsatz 2009 beitragen konnten.
Im Einzelnen zeigen die wesentlichen Kennziffern des Konzerns folgende Entwicklung: Kennzahlen
| Kennzahlen zur Ertragslage der Gruppe |
Einheit | 2009 | 2008 | 2008 | 2007 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| vergleichbar | |||||
| Umsatz | EUR Mio. |
607,0 | 768,3 | 1.081,5 | 665,0 |
| EBITDA | EUR Mio. |
10,2 | 50,2 | 65,0 | 63,7 |
| EBITDA-Marge (EBITDA/Umsatz) |
% | 1,7 | 6,5 | 6,0 | 9,6 |
| EBIT vor Restrukturierungskosten |
EUR Mio. |
-22,4 | 13,9 | 16,7 | 41,0 |
| EBIT nach Restrukturierungskosten |
EUR Mio. |
-30,2 | 13,9 | 16,7 | 41,0 |
| ¸hrten Aktivit‰ten EBIT-Marge (EBIT/Umsatz) |
% | -5,0 | 1,8 | 1,5 | 6,2 |
| Net Profit aus fortgef |
EUR Mio. |
-51,4 | 9,8 | 3,0 | 37,3 |
| Net Profit-Marge (Ergebnis nach Steuern/Umsatz) |
% | -8,5 | 1,3 | 0,3 | 5,6 |
| Ergebnis je Aktie |
EUR | -2,33 | 0,42 | 0,08 | 1,66 |
| Durchschnittliches Capital Employed |
EUR Mio. |
336,7 | n/a | 365,0 | 171,9 |
| ROCE vor Steuern (EBIT/Capital Employed) |
% | -9,0 | n/a | 4,6 | 23,9 |
Umsatz Peguform Group
Die Ende 2008 einsetzende Krise des Automobil- und im Speziellen des Nutzfahrzeugmarkts zog sich durch das gesamte Gesch‰ftsjahr 2009 und ist der wesentliche Grund, warum das Betriebsergebnis der Gruppe im Gesch‰ftsjahr 2009 deutlich negativ ausf‰llt.
Das EBITDA blieb jedoch mit EUR 10,2 Mio. im Gesamtjahr noch deutlich positiv, da vor allem in der zweiten Jahresh‰lfte, nach erfolgreicher Umsetzung von Restrukturierungsmaflnahmen, wieder positive EBITDA-Margen ausgewiesen werden konnten.
Analog zur Entwicklung des EBIT reduziert sich auch das Ergebnis nach Steuern aus fortgef¸hrten Aktivit‰ten auf EUR -51,4 Mio. im Vergleich zu EUR 9,8 Mio. im Vorjahr. Das anteilige Ergebnis aus der Abgabe der Peguform Group schl‰gt sich zus‰tzlich mit EUR -38,7 Mio. zu Buche.
In diesem Zusammenhang stehen auch EUR 7,8 Mio. welche in der Gewinn- und Verlustrechnung als Restrukturierungskosten dargestellt sind. Eine entsprechende Erl‰uterung der einzelnen Posten erfolgt im Konzernanhang unter D.7.
Der Anteil der einzelnen Divisionen am Umsatz hat sich im Jahr 2009 deutlich ver‰ndert. Der Anteil der Automotive Composites Division am Konzernumsatz, hat sich infolge der dramatischen Umsatzeinbr¸che auf dem Nutzfahrzeugmarkt von zuvor rund 36% auf knapp 26% reduziert.
Automotive
| Umsatz | EUR Mio. |
369,7 | 392,4 | 705,6 | 369,3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anteil am Konzernumsatz |
% | 60,6 | 51,1 | 65,2 | 55,5 |
| EBITDA | EUR Mio. |
1,4 | 3,5 | 18,3 | 25,8 |
| EBITDA-Marge (EBITDA/Umsatz) |
% | 0,4 | 0,9 | 2,6 | 7,0 |
| EBIT vor Restrukturierungskosten |
-21,5 | -21,2 | -18,3 | 10,8 | |
| EBIT nach Restrukturierungskosten |
EUR Mio. |
-23,7 | -21,2 | -18,3 | 10,8 |
| EBIT-Marge (EBIT/Umsatz) |
% | -6,4 | -5,4 | -2,6 | 2,9 |
| Net Profit |
EUR Mio. |
-21,5 | -24,1 | -30,9 | 4,1 |
| Net Profit-Marge (Ergebnis nach Steuern/Umsatz) |
% | -5,8 | -6,1 | -4,4 | 1,1 |
| Durchschnittliches Capital Employed |
EUR Mio. |
257,3 | n/a | 282,7 | 106,2 |
Die Automotive Systems Division ist mit 61% Anteil am Konzernumsatz die nach wie vor grˆflte Division der POLYTEC GROUP. Sie erzielte bei einem Umsatzr¸ckgang von 5,8 % auf EUR 369,7 Mio. ein Jahresergebnis nach Steuern von EUR -21,5 Mio. In diesem Ergebnis enthalten sind auch einmalige Restrukturierungsaufwendungen f¸r Personalabbau in Hˆhe von EUR 2,2 Mio. sowie Wertminderungen im Zuge von auflerordentlichen Abschreibungen auf das Anlagevermˆgen von EUR 3,9 Mio.
Beim Teileumsatz war ein R¸ckgang von 17,1% auf EUR 310,3 Mio. zu verzeichnen. Der Werkzeugumsatz erhˆhte sich von zuvor EUR 18,0 Mio. auf EUR 59,4 Mio.
EUR. Dieser Anstieg ist im Wesentlichen auf bereits im Gesch‰ftsjahr 2009 angelaufene Projekte zur¸ckzuf¸hren.
Der starke R¸ckgang des Teileumsatzes ist neben der allgemeinen Wirtschaftsentwicklung vor allem auch auf die diversen Anreizprogramme zur¸ckzuf¸hren, welche f¸r die Division, als Lieferant des Premium-Segments, keine unterst¸tzende Auswirkung hatten.
Das EBIT der Division betrug 2009 EUR -23,7 Mio. nach EUR -21,2 Mio. im Jahr 2008. In dem Wert von 2008 war eine auflerplanm‰flige Firmenwertabschreibung von EUR 6,3 Mio. enthalten. Demgegen¸ber sind im Wert von 2009 die oben erw‰hnten Einmaleffekte von insgesamt EUR 6,1 Mio. zu ber¸cksichtigen.
Die negative Ergebnissituation gibt im Wesentlichen den im vierten Quartal 2008 einsetzenden Einbruch der Automobilindustrie wieder, wobei im zweiten Halbjahr 2009 bereits erste Effekte von Einsparungsmaflnahmen wirksam waren und das EBIT daher im Vergleich zum vierten Quartal 2008 (EUR -10,3 Mio.) deutlich gesteigert werden konnte.
| Umsatz | EUR Mio. |
156,3 | 277,9 | 201,3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anteil am Konzernumsatz |
% | 25,8 | 36,2 | 30,3 |
| EBITDA | EUR Mio. |
0,5 | 32,7 | 24,9 |
| EBITDA-Marge (EBITDA/Umsatz) |
% | 0,4 | 11,8 | 12,4 |
| EBIT vor Restrukturierungskosten |
-6,1 | 24,3 | 19,9 | |
| EBIT nach Restrukturierungskosten |
EUR Mio. |
-7,8 | 24,3 | 19,9 |
| EBIT-Marge (EBIT/Umsatz) |
% | -5,0 | 8,8 | 9,9 |
| Net Profit |
EUR Mio. |
-12,8 | 14,4 | 23,7 |
| Net Profit-Marge (Ergebnis nach Steuern/Umsatz) |
% | -8,2 | 5,2 | 11,8 |
| Durchschnittliches Capital Employed |
EUR Mio. |
‰gt 35,9 |
von 36,9 |
22,3 |
Umsatz- und Ergebniseinbr¸chen in der Nutzfahrzeugindustrie. Trotz der erstmalig ganzj‰hrigen Ber¸cksichtigung der Werke POLYTEC Composites Bohemia sowie POLYTEC Composites Weiden, welche 2009 mit rund EUR 34 Mio. zum Umsatz beitrugen, sank dieser in der Vergleichsperiode um 43,8% auf EUR 156,3 Mio. Der starke (organische) Umsatzr¸ckgang entspricht im Wesentlichen der Entwicklung des Nutzfahrzeugmarktes, welcher sich, gemessen an der europ‰ischen Produktionsmenge 2009 um 64 % reduzierte.
Der Markt ist aufgrund des Nachfrageeinbruchs beginnend mit dem vierten Quartal 2008 derzeit tendenziell gepr‰gt von hohen ‹berkapazit‰ten und verzerrten Kostenstrukturen auf Grund von Investitionen, die von den Zulieferern basierend auf deutlich hˆheren Absatzerwartungen get‰tigt wurden. Auf Grund dieser negativen Entwicklung war es notwendig, die Kapazit‰ten an allen Standorten der Division bestmˆglich an die zu erwartend schwache Auslastung anzupassen. Neben einem fast g‰nzlichen Abbau des Leihpersonalstandes wurden an allen Standorten auch Kurzarbeitsmodelle umgesetzt. Die erfolgreich umgesetzten Maflnahmen spiegeln sich auch in einer quartalsweisen Betrachtung des EBITDA wider, welches sich im Jahresverlauf deutlich verbessern konnte und f¸r das gesamte Jahr 2009 einen Wert von EUR 0,5 Mio. erreichte.
Das EBIT derDivision verschlechterte sich in Folge des Umsatzr¸ckgangs auf EUR -7,8 Mio., wohingegen im Vorjahr nach einer erfolgreichen Restrukturierung noch ein positives EBIT von EUR 24,3 Mio. ausgewiesen werden konnte. Dies entspricht einer Verschlechterung der EBIT-Marge von 8,8% auf -5,0%.
Auf Grund der dramatischen Markteinbr¸che wurden auch strukturelle Verbesserungsmaflnahmen umgesetzt. Neben der mit Jahresende 2008 vollzogenen Schlieflung des Standortes in Trnava (Slowakei), wurde zu Begin 2009 mit der geordneten Schlieflung des Standortes Ljungby (Schweden) begonnen, die bis zum Ende des Jahres weitgehend abgeschlossen wurde. Auf Grund der hohen Belastung mit Schlieflungskosten musste jedoch zu Beginn des laufenden Jahres f¸r diese Firma Insolvenz angemeldet werden.
| Umsatz | EUR Mio. |
64,3 | 77,7 | 74,7 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anteil am Konzernumsatz |
% | 10,6 | 10,1 | 11,3 |
| EBITDA | EUR Mio. |
5,1 | 8,9 | 9,6 |
| EBITDA-Marge (EBITDA/Umsatz) |
% | 7,9 | 11,4 | 12,9 |
| EBIT | EUR Mio. |
3,1 | 6,8 | 7,9 |
| EBIT-Marge (EBIT/Umsatz) |
% | 4,8 | 8,7 | 10,6 |
| Net Profit |
EUR Mio. |
2,1 | 4,4 | 5,3 |
| Net Profit-Marge (Ergebnis nach Steuern/Umsatz) |
% | 3,3 | 5,7 | 7,1 |
| Durchschnittliches Capital Employed |
EUR Mio. |
33,0 | 34,7 | 33,0 |
In Anbetracht der Vehemenz der Krise war die Car Styling Division durchaus erfolgreich. Trotzdem konnte sie sich der Krise der Automobilindustrie nicht komplett entziehen und verzeichnete sowohl beim Umsatz- als auch beim Ergebnis einen R¸ckgang. Bei einem Umsatz von EUR 64,3 Mio. konnte ein EBIT von EUR 3,1 Mio. bzw. eine EBIT Marge von 4,8% erzielt werden.
Da der Trend zur Individualisierung von Fahrzeugen weiterhin ein wichtiges Thema f¸r die Automobilindustrie sein wird, werden die Marktchancen f¸rdiese Division weiterhin als gut eingesch‰tzt.
SonstigeGesch‰ftsbereiche
| Umsatz | EUR Mio. |
16,8 | 20,3 | 19,6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anteil am Konzernumsatz |
% | 2,9 | 2,6 | 2,9 |
| EBITDA | EUR Mio. |
3,3 | 5,2 | 3,5 |
| EBIT vor Restrukturierungskosten |
2,2 | 3,9 | 2,4 | |
| EBIT nach Restrukturierungskosten |
EUR Mio. |
-1,7 | 3,9 | 2,4 |
| ‰ftsbereiche Net Profit |
erfassen im EUR Mio. |
Wesentlichen -19,3 |
das nicht 15,0 |
4,2 |
Gesch‰ft des Konzerns. In diesem Bereich werden auch die konzernleitende POLYTEC Holding AG sowie Ergebniseinfl¸sse aus nicht den Divisionen zuordenbaren Konsolidierungsvorg‰ngen abgebildet.
Das negative Ergebnis ist vor allem auf Kosten im Zusammenhang mit der Abgabe der PEGUFORM GROUP in Hˆhe von EUR 3,1 Mio. zur¸ckzuf¸hren.
| ˆgen/ | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anlagenquote (Anlageverm Bilanzsumme) |
% | 39,3 | 51,5 | 32,7 |
| Eigenkapitalquote (Eigenkapital/Bilanzsumme) ˆgen (Net Working |
% | 18,5 | 15,2 | 35,7 |
| Bilanzsumme | EUR Mio. |
332,1 | 1.020,8 | 445,0 |
| ˆgen in % vom Nettoumlaufverm Capital) |
EUR Mio. |
26,0 | 17,9 | 77,3 |
| Nettoumlaufverm Umsatz (NWC/Umsatz) |
% | 4,3 | 4,4 | 8,9 |
Die Anlagenquote hat sich auf Grund der Abgabe der PEGUFORM GROUP gegen¸ber 2008 wesentlich reduziert. Die Investitionen in das Anlagevermˆgen reduzierten sich im Gesch‰ftsjahr 2009 um 47,2 % auf EUR 20,6 Mio. und betrafen im Wesentlichen kundenbezogene Investitionen f¸r die Anschaffung von Anlagen f¸r bevorstehen Projektneuanl‰ufe.
Die Steigerung der Eigenkapitalquote von 15,2% auf 18,5% trotz der aktuellen Verlustsituation ist auf die Entschuldung und insbesondere eine in diesem Zusammenhang reduzierte Bilanzsumme im Zuge des Abganges der PEGUFORM GROUP zur¸ckzuf¸hren.
| Nettofinanzschulden | EUR Mio. |
69,9 | 346,4 | 29,2 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nettofinanzschulden zu EBITDA |
- | 6,9 | 5,33 | 0,46 |
| ¸ckga Gearing (Nettofinanzschulden/Eigenkapital) |
- | 1,14 | 2,24 | 0,18 |
POLTEC GROUP im Zusammenhang mit der Abgabe der PEGUFORM GROUP zur¸ckzuf¸hren. CASH
| ‰tigkeit | vergleichbar | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ‰tigkeit Cash-Flow aus der Betriebst |
EUR Mio. |
10,7 | 70,1 | -7,5 |
| ‰tigkeit Cash-Flow aus der Investitionst |
EUR Mio. |
-18,0 | -238,3 | -9,7 |
| ‰nderung der fl¸ssigen Mittel Cash-Flow aus der Finanzierungst |
EUR Mio. |
19,9 | 163,8 | 23,6 |
| ‰tigkeit Ver |
v EUR Mio. |
12,6 | -4,4 | ‰gt vom 6,4 |
| Der Cash Flow aus der Betriebst |
on EUR |
10,7 | Mio. ist gepr |
Ergebnisr¸ckgang in Folge der krisenbedingten Umsatzr¸ckg‰nge und Sonderaufwendungen im Zusammenhang mit Restrukturierungsmaflnahmen. Gleichzeitig f¸hrten Maflnahmen im Bereich des Working Capital Managements zu
positiven Effekten. Die Investitionen wurden, wie erw‰hnt, weitestgehend auf kundenbezogene bzw. Effizienz steigernde Projekte konzentriert.
IV/14
Der mit EUR 19,9 Mio. positive Cash Flow aus der Finanzierungst‰tigkeit resultiert im Wesentlichen aus den im Zuge der Restrukturierung von der Hausbank der POLYTEC GROUP zus‰tzlich zurVerf¸gung gestellten Finanzmittel. Gesch‰ftsentwicklungder Gesellschaft
Die POLYTEC Holding AG musste im Gesch‰ftsjahr 2009 Abschreibungen auf Finanzanlagen iHv. EUR 1,0 Mio. vornehmen. Dar¸ber hinaus waren Wertberichtigungen, Foderungsverzichte gegen Tochtergesellschaften sowie Risikovorsorgen f¸r die Schlieflung eines Standortes notwendig, was das Jahresergebnis mit weiteren EUR 4,9 Mio. an einmaligen Aufwendungen f¸r verbundene Unternehmen belastete. Dem gegen¸ber standen Zuschreibungen zu Finanzanlagen in der Hˆhe von EUR 4,1 Mio. die auf die verbesserte Ertragslage einer Tochtergesellschaft als auch auf die nachhaltige Wertsteigerung bei, durch eine Tochtergellschaft gehaltenen Wertpapieren zur¸ckzuf¸hren ist.
Die Aufwendungen waren notwendig, da sich die Ertragslage der betreffenden Gesellschaften aufgrund der Automobil- und Wirtschaftskrise verschlechterte.
Im auflerordentlichen Ergebnis des Gesch‰ftsjahres in Hˆhe von EUR 1,4 Mio sind alle Aufwendungen und Ertr‰ge abgebildet, die mit der Restrukturierung und der damit verbundenen Abgabe der Peguform-Gruppe in Zusammenhang stehen. Die Restrukturierung basiert auf einem mit den Hauptgl‰ubigerbanken vereinbarten und mit Zustimmung der auflerordentlichen Hauptversammlung vom 26.6.2009
abgeschlossenen Konzept zur Entschuldung der POLYTEC Holding AG.Der Jahresgewinn 2009 f¸hrte zu einem entsprechenden Anstieg des Eigenkapitals der Gesellschaft, was zusammen mit dem deutlichen R¸ckgang der Bilanzsumme zu einem im Vergleich zum Vorjahr wesentlichen Anstieg der Eigenkapitalquote auf 83,3 % gef¸hrt hat.
Praktischer Umweltschutz ist mehr als die Einhaltung ordnungsrechtlicher Pflichten. Viele Organisationen gehen ¸ber die gesetzlichen Anforderungen hinaus und verringern aufgrund der freiwilligen Einf¸hrung eines Umweltmanagementsystems mit der zentralen Zielsetzung einer kontinuierlichen Verbesserung nachteilige Umweltauswirkungen. Das daf¸r weltweit anwendbare Instrument zur Errichtung eines Umweltmanagementsystems ist die Norm ISO 14001. Alle wesentlichen Standorte des Konzerns sind nach dieser Norm zertifiziert.
F¸r die POLYTEC GROUP ist der schonende Umgang mit nat¸rlichen Ressourcen ein Kernpunkt der Gesch‰ftst‰tigkeit. Als schwerpunktm‰flig kunststoffverarbeitender Konzern ist vor allem Abfallvermeidung ein wesentlicher Aspekt. In den Werken, die vor allem in der Spritzgusstechnologie arbeiten, wird daher versucht, Ausschuss so weit wie mˆglich zu regranulieren und wieder in den Produktionsprozess einflieflen zu lassen. Ein weiterer Schwerpunkt liegt im verst‰rkten Einsatz von nat¸rlichen Werkstoffen.
S‰mtliche Aktivit‰ten im Bereich Forschung und Entwicklung fokussieren auch auf die wirtschaftliche (sparsame) Nutzung von Rohstoffen oder den Einsatz von alternativen Materialien. EMPEFLEX
ist ein flachsfaserverst‰rktes Polypropylen f¸r Innenraumverkleidungen, welche neben seinem geringen spezifischen Gewicht auch verschiedenste weitere funktionelle Vorteile bietet. So ist der Werkstoff bei hoher Steifigkeit sehr schlagz‰h, was sich in sehr guten Crasheigenschaften wieder spiegelt. Zudem kˆnnen Bauteile aus EMPEFLEX kleberlos mit Dekorwerkstoffen kaschiert werden, was zum einen die Wirtschaftlichkeit erhˆht und zum anderen die Emissionswerte reduziert und gleichzeitig die Recyclingf‰higkeit eines Gesamtverbundes mit thermoplastischen Oberfl‰chen-Materialien ermˆglicht. . Basis von EMPEFLEX ist die Flachspflanze, die kaum D¸ngung und Pflanzenschutzmittel braucht und damit schon bei der Produktion dieses nachwachsenden Rohstoffes sehr umweltschonend ist.Zum anderen ist Flachs eine 1-Jahrespflanze, woraus sich ein geschlossener CO²- Kreislauf ergibt. Am Ende des Fahrzeuglebenszyklus kann EMPEFLEX aus den
Karosserien ausgebaut und als Rohstoff wieder verwendet oder energierecycelt werden.
Nach wie vor in Produktion befinden sie folgende, hinsichtlich ihres Beitrages zur Reduktion von Emissionswerten positiv zu beurteilenden Technologien: POLYSWIRL (÷labscheider System; Reduktion des ÷lverbrauchs)
Eine weitere Entwicklung ist der Einsatz von Zuckerrohr-Harz als Matrix-Werkstoff f¸r langfaserverst‰rkte Innenverkleidungsteile. Die so produzierten Verkleidungsteile bestehen zu fast 100% aus nachwachsenden Rohstoffen. Das Verfahren wird derzeit aber noch nicht in Serie eingesetzt. Arbeitnehmer
Die durchschnittliche Anzahl der Besch‰ftigten 1 der POLYTEC GROUP und ihre geografische Verteilung in den Jahren 2007 bis 2009 stellt sich wie folgt dar:
| 2009 | 2008 vergleichbar |
2008 (inkl. Peguform) |
2007 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ÷sterreich | ||||
| 382 | 424 | 424 | 363 | |
| Deutschland | 3.644 | 4.028 | 4.831 | 4.072 |
| Resteuropa | 1.341 | 1.827 | 2.208 | 1.716 |
| ¸damerika Nordamerika |
15 | 17 | 17 | 25 |
| ¸dafrika S |
0 | 0 | 281 | 0 |
| S Summe |
76 5.525 |
83 6.539 |
83 8.095 |
102 6.432 |
| Asien | 67 | 160 | 252 | 154 |
1 Inkl. Leiharbeiter/Mitarbeiter von erstmals in den Konzernabschluss einbezogenen Unternehmen sind in der Aufstellung zeitanteilig ab dem Zeitpunkt der Erstkonsolidierung enthalten.
| vergleichb ar |
Peguform) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Automotive Systems Division |
2.908 | 3.056 | 4.930 | 3.321 |
| Automotive Composites Division |
1.867 | 2.686 | 2.368 | 2.380 |
| ‰ftsbereiche und Konzernleitung Car Styling Division |
610 | 647 | 647 | 591 |
| Summe Sonstige Gesch |
5.525 140 |
6.539 150 |
8.095 150 |
6.432 140 |
Nach Divisionen gliedert sich der durchschnittliche Besch‰ftigtenstand wie folgt:
Als wesentliche Kennzahl im Personalbereich entwickelte sich der Umsatz je Mitarbeiter wie folgt:
| Einheit | 2009 | 2008 vergleichbar |
2008 (inkl. Peguform) |
2007 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Umsatz je Mitarbeiter |
TEUR | 110 | 117 | 134 | 103 |
Kundenorientierung wie auch die laufende Verbesserung der Prozesse im Hinblick auf Wirtschaftlichkeit, Umwelt und Effizienz nehmen f¸r die POLYTEC GROUP hˆchste Priorit‰t ein; diese Aspekte bestimmen auch die Einstellung der Mitarbeiter der POLYTEC gegen¸ber ihrer T‰tigkeit.
Um f¸r die dynamischen Herausforderungen des Marktes ger¸stet zu sein, fˆrdert die POLYTEC GROUP die laufende Weiterbildung seiner Mitarbeiter sowohl durch konzerninterne Fortbildungsmaflnahmen als auch durch Entsendung zu externen Bildungseinrichtungen. Neben der Weiterentwicklung des technisch-handwerklichen Know-how wird auch ein Schwerpunkt auf die Vermittlung von Fremdsprachen gelegt, ein f¸r ein internationales Unternehmen wie POLYTEC unverzichtbarer Bestandteil des Gesch‰ftserfolgs.
F¸r leitende Mitarbeiter ist ein Teil der Verg¸tung an den Unternehmenserfolg gekoppelt, um die Unternehmensidentifikation und das Verantwortungsbewusstsein zu fˆrdern.
In einer am 5. Februar 2010 abgehaltenen auflerordentlichen Hauptversammlung kam es zur Wahl und Wiederwahl von Mitgliedern des Aufsichtrates. Der bisherige Aufsichtsrat wurde, mit Ausnahme des mit dieser Hauptversammlung ausgeschiedenen Mitgliedes Dr. Andreas Szigmund, wiedergew‰hlt. Neu in den Aufsichtsrat wurden Mag. Reinhard Schwendtbauer sowie Univ. Prof. Mag. Dr. Meinhard Lukas gew‰hlt.
Hinsichtlich der weiteren Ereignisse nach dem Bilanzstichtag, die vor allem f¸r die Bewertung der Vermˆgensgegenst‰nde und Schulden materiell sind, verweisen wir auf die Erl‰uterung im Anhang unter Abschnitt V.
Wie bereits beschrieben konnten sich unsere Kunden der schwierigen Marktsituation nicht entziehen. F¸r das Jahr 2010 zeigen sich aber vor allem die Premiumhersteller wieder optimistischer und rechnen mit leichten Zuw‰chsen gegen¸ber dem Vorjahr. Mittelfristig halten die wichtigsten Kunden an ihren Wachstumszielen fest und rechnen f¸r die Zukunft mit einer wieder erstarkten Automobilkonjunktur.
Im Bereich Nutzfahrzeuge erwarten die Hersteller trotz der nach wie vor unsicheren Marktlage leichte Steigerungen f¸r 2010. Grund zu dieser Annahme ist der im Jahr 2009 durchgef¸hrte Abbau der Fahrzeuglagerbest‰nde. Daraus resultierende Steigerungen in der Produktion sind durch eine im Vergleich zum Vorjahr geringere Anzahl der geplanten Schliefltage belegt. Man geht davon aus, dass diese moderate Marktbelebung im 2. Halbjahr noch zunehmen wird. Eine sp¸rbare Besserung der Gesamtsituation sehen die Hauptkunden jedoch erstin den Jahren 2011 und 2012. Besonders f¸r 2012 ist die Erwartungshaltung der meisten Nutzfahrzeug-OEMs recht hoch, wenn die heutigen Lkws durch die neue Fahrzeuggeneration mit Motoren der EURO 5 und 6 Normen ersetzt werden. Allerdings wird nicht damit gerechnet, dass die Bauzahlen die Grˆflenordnung der Boomjahre 2007 und 2008 erreichen werden.
Systems Division - F¸r das Gesch‰ftsjahr 2010 wird mit einem leichten Umsatzanstieg gerechnet. Auf Grund der klaren Positionierung der Division als Lieferant des europ‰ischen Premium Segments ist f¸r das Jahr 2010 kein negativer
Umsatzeffekt bedingt durch das Auslaufen der diversen europ‰ischen Abwrackpr‰mien zu erwarten.
Aufgrund der positiven Umsatzentwicklung und der weiteren Umsetzung von Optimierungsmaflnahmen ist davon auszugehen, dass das Betriebsergebnis 2010 in diesem Segment gesteigert werden kann. Automotive
Composites Division Die allgemeine Marktentwicklung gibt trotz leichter Steigerungen seit Beginn des Jahres 2010 derzeit noch kaum Anhaltspunkte auf eine nachhaltige Erholung. F¸r die Division konnten aber durch die bisher gesetzten absatz- und kostenseitigen Maflnahmen Verbesserungen erreicht werden, die in 2010 voll wirksam werden sollen. Falls sich die Auslastungssituation ¸ber das Jahr 2010 hinaus nicht weiter
verbessert, kˆnnen aber insbesondere nach dem Auslaufen der Kurzarbeitsmodelle ab 2011 weitere Restrukturierungsmaflnahmen nicht ausgeschlossen werden.
Die POLYTEC-Gruppe war im Herbst 2008 nach der ‹bernahme der Peguform- Gruppe im Zuge der Finanzmarktkrise aufgrund der nach der Akquisition substantiell gestiegenen Konzernverschuldung in eine, die Existenz bedrohende Lage geraten. Im Fr¸hjahr 2009 wurde mit den Gl‰ubigerbanken eine umfassende Restrukturierung der Gruppe verhandelt, die in der Abgabe der PEGUFORM GROUP und damit einhergehend einer nachhaltigen Entschuldung des Konzerns m¸ndete und im Sommer 2009 erfolgreich abgeschlossen wurde. Mit der Entschuldung und Absicherung der Konzernmutter wurden von der Hausbank der Gruppe zus‰tzliche Finanzmittel in Hˆhe von EUR 31 Mio. zugesichert, um die Liquidit‰tserfordernisse der laufenden Gesch‰ftst‰tigkeit sicherzustellen. Unternehmensfortf¸hrung
Die anhaltende globale Finanz- und Wirtschaftskrise und die starke wirtschaftliche Verlangsamung stellen f¸r den Konzern der POLYTEC Holding AG und damit f¸r die Gesellschaft eine grofle Herausforderung dar. Die Entwicklung des Konzerns der POLYTEC Holding AG war im Jahr 2009 von einem massiven Einbruch der Pkw- und Nutzfahrzeugkonjunktur gepr‰gt, der zu wesentlichen Umsatz- und
IV/21
Ergebnisverschlechterungen f¸hrte. 2009 wurde unter Ber¸cksichtigung der zur Ver‰uflerung gehaltenen Gesch‰ftsbereiche ein negatives Konzernergebnis nach Steuern von MEUR -90,1 erzielt. Auf Grund der derzeitigen wirtschaftlichen Situation und der schwer einsch‰tzbaren
Entwicklung im Pkw- und Nutzfahrzeugbereich kˆnnen Ver‰nderungen in der k¸nftigen Ertragslage und im k¸nftigen Finanzierungsbedarf eintreten, die aus heutiger Sicht nicht abschlieflend eingesch‰tzt werden kˆnnen. Auf Basis der Planungsrechnungen soll f¸r 2010 auf Konzernebene ein positiver Betriebserfolg (EBIT) erzielt werden. Die Liquidit‰tsvorschau f¸r 2010 zeigt auf Basis der urspr¸nglichen Planungsrechnungen einen zus‰tzlichen Bedarf an liquiden Mitteln von ca. MEUR 18,5, der in den bestehenden Rahmen ausreichend Deckung findet. Es ist anzumerken, dass die Planungsrechnungen und die daraus resultierenden Liquidit‰tsplanungen noch unverhandelte Maflnahmen (z.B. Umsatzzuw‰chse und Personalkostenreduktionen) beinhalten. Der tats‰chliche Ausgang dieser Verhandlungen kann einen wesentlichen Einfluss auf die k¸nftige Ertragslage und den Finanzbedarf der Gesellschaft und des Konzerns sowie der Einzelgesellschaften haben. Die Planungsrechnungen wurden vom verantwortlichen lokalen Management und dem Vorstand auf Grundlage der derzeit schwer einsch‰tzbaren Entwicklung der Automobil- und Nutzfahrzeugbranche nach bestem Wissen erstellt und entsprechen dem aktuellen Wissensstand. Auf Grund der bestehenden allgemeinen Unsicherheit auf Grund der Krise kann nicht ausgeschlossen werden, dass Tochtergesellschaften der Gesellschaft in ihrem Fortbestand gef‰hrdet sind. Daher sind nachteilige k¸nftige Wertminderungen der bilanzierten Vermˆgenswerte ñ insbesondere der Anteile an verbundenen Unternehmen sowie der Forderungen gegen¸ber verbundenen Unternehmen ñ bzw. Inansprucnahmen aus Haftungen mˆglich. In den ersten beiden Monaten 2010 lag das Ergebnis auf Konzernebene leicht hinter Plan. Weiters ist f¸r den positiven Fortbestand der Gesellschaft und des Konzerns die
Finanzierung durch die Hausbank wesentlich. Die finanzierende Hausbank hat als Hauptgl‰ubiger mit Schreiben vom 9. M‰rz 2010 auch schriftlich best‰tigt, dass sie beabsichtigt, bei einer den urspr¸nglichen Planungsrechnungen entsprechenden Entwicklung des Konzerns der POLYTEC Holding AG die Finanzierungszusagen weiterhin aufrecht zu erhalten, vorbehaltlich Gremialzustimmung auch bis 31. Dezember 2011. Planabweichungen einzelner Gesellschaften und/oder Standorte des Konzerns der POLYTEC Holding AG werden von der finanzierenden Hausbank
nicht als alleinige Begr¸ndung f¸r eine K¸ndigung von Finanzierungszusagen herangezogen werden, sofern die Entwicklung des gesamten Konzerns der POLYTEC Holding AG weiterhin nicht signifikant von den urspr¸nglichen Planungsrechnungen abweicht. Im Falle, dass es zu weiteren Ergebnisr¸ckg‰ngen und/oder zu keiner Weiterfinanzierung k‰me, w‰re der Bestand der Gesellschaft und des Konzerns gef‰hrdet.
Auf Basis der vorliegenden Planungsrechnungen und aufgrund der dargestellten Finanzierungszusage der Hausbank geht der Vorstand von der Fortf¸hrung des Unternehmens aus. Risikoberichterstattung
Die POLYTEC GROUP ist im Rahmen ihrer Gesch‰ftst‰tigkeit einer Vielzahl von Risiken ausgesetzt, die untrennbar mit dem unternehmerischen Handeln verbunden sind. Risikomanagement ist f¸r die POLYTEC ein integraler Bestandteil aller Gesch‰ftsprozesse. Auch die f¸r einen Automobilzulieferer notwendigen umfangreichen Zertifizierungen (z.B. TS ISO/16949:2002) geben hier bereits entsprechende Regelungen vor, welche auch durch externe Audits ¸berwacht werden. Der Organisation der POLYTEC entsprechend werden Risiken dezentral und marktnah vor allem im Rahmen der laufenden Gesch‰ftsprozesse gemanagt und ¸berwacht. Die Steuerung der finanziellen Risiken erfolgt jedoch im Wesentlichen durch die Konzernzentrale. Folgende wesentliche Risikofelder kˆnnen identifiziert werden:
Die Automobilzulieferindustrie gilt als Markt mit hohem Wettbewerb, der sich auflerdem in einem rasch fortschreitenden Konsolidierungsprozess befindet. Die Absatzerfolge sind in erster Linie abh‰ngig von der Gewinnung neuer Auftr‰ge, welche in der Regel 2 bis 3 Jahre vor dem Serienanlauf vergeben werden. In dieser Phase der Auftragsakquisition ist jeder Zulieferer einem starken Konditionenwettbewerb ausgesetzt. W‰hrend des Serienlaufs ist der Zulieferer auch abh‰ngig vom Absatz des Fahrzeuges, f¸r welches er zuliefert, ohne diesen Erfolg
beeinflussen zu kˆnnen. Weiters wird seitens der OEMs auch nach dem Serienstart ein laufendes Benchmarking der Zulieferer betrieben, was Preisforderungen oder im Extremfall den Verlust eines Auftrages nach sich ziehen kann. POLYTEC trachtet durch einen ausgewogenen Kunden- und Auftragsmix, die Abh‰ngigkeit von einzelnen Lieferbeziehungen so gering wie mˆglich zu halten.
Wesentliches Risiko ist die Schwankung der Rohstoffpreise, welche im Falle der POLYTEC GROUP als kunststoffverarbeitendem Konzern vor allem durch nachhaltige Ver‰nderung des ÷lpreises, aber auch der Raffineriekapazit‰ten verursacht werden. Beschaffungsseitig wird diesem Risiko vorallem mit langfristigen Liefervertr‰gen und absatzseitig, soweit gegen¸ber dem Kunden durchsetzbar, mit Materialgleitklauseln in den offen gelegten Kalkulationen entgegengewirkt. Zum Teil erfolgt die Verhandlung von Rohstoffen und Zukaufteilen direkt durch unsere Kunden mit dem Lieferanten. Soweit mit dem Kunden Preise nur auf Jahresfrist vereinbart sind, ist die Ver‰nderung der Rohstoffpreise ein wichtiger Parameter in den Gespr‰chen f¸r die j‰hrliche Neufestlegung der Preise. Weiters versucht man durch verst‰rkte Forschungs- und Entwicklungsaufwendungen neue Rohstoffe (Naturfaserstoffe) einzusetzen. Finanzielle
Aufgrund der Kundenstruktur, mehr als 90% des Umsatzes wird mit den OEMs oder groflen Systemlieferanten erzielt, ist die POLYTEC dem Bonit‰tsrisiko der Automobilindustrie ausgesetzt. Die Auflenst‰nde werden laufend kritisch verfolgt und die vereinbarungsgem‰fle Bezahlung von Forderungen sichergestellt. Im Gesch‰ftsjahr 2009 wurden rund 55% (2008: 60%) des Umsatzes mit den drei grˆflten Kunden erzielt, was ein gewisses Klumpenkreditrisiko ergibt, welches vom Management aber als unkritisch im Hinblick auf Kreditausf‰lle eingestuft wird. Die
Abh‰ngigkeit von wenigen Kunden ist ein Wesensmerkmal der Automobilzulieferindustrie. Als Kunde wird in diesem Zusammenhang eine Gruppe verbundener Unternehmen definiert, welche durchaus auch mehrere Automobilmarken herstellen kann.
Das Ausfallsrisiko bei fl¸ssigen Mitteln ist gering, da die Vertragspartner ausschliefllich Banken mit bestmˆglicher Bonit‰t sind.
Die Gruppe sichert ihren Liquidit‰tsbedarf durch vertragliche Vereinbarung entsprechender Kreditrahmen, gegebenenfalls auch durch Halten einer Barreserve. Die Steuerung erfolgt einheitlich durch die Konzernzentrale. F¸r alle wesentlichen Unternehmen der Gruppe ist ein Cashmanagement-System installiert, das auch zur Optimierung des Nettozinsergebnisses dient.
Der weitaus ¸berwiegende Anteil der Ums‰tze der POLYTEC GROUP wird in Euro fakturiert, sodass das W‰hrungsrisiko den Konzern in Summe nur gering betrifft. Zum Teil erfolgt der Einkauf von Vorleistungen in derselben W‰hrung wie der Verkauf, sodass sich W‰hrungsrisiken nat¸rlich Ñhedgenì. Die Gruppe ist grˆfleren W‰hrungsrisiken in jenen L‰ndern ausgesetzt, in denen in Euro fakturiert, aber Vorleistungen in lokaler W‰hrung zugekauft werden m¸ssen. Solche Risiken bestehen etwa gegen den Polnischen Zloty. Diese Risiken sind vielfach nicht Finanzinstrumenten zuzuordnen, da sie vor allem auch auf Personalkosten zur¸ckzuf¸hren sind.
Dem Zins‰nderungsrisiko begegnet POLYTEC durch ein der langfristigen Zinsmeinung entsprechendes Portfolio von variablen und fixen Finanzierungen.
Derivative Produkte werden bei Bedarf zur Zinssicherung oder zur Optimierung des Nettozinsergebnisses eingesetzt.
.
Die von der Gruppe gehaltenen bˆrsenotierten Wertpapiere des Umlaufvermˆgens (Aktien) unterliegen dem Risiko der Bˆrsekurs‰nderung. Ein Anstieg (Fall) des Bˆrsekurses um 10% w¸rde unter der Voraussetzung, dass keine erfolgswirksam zu erfassende Wertminderung vorliegt, zu einer erfolgsneutralen Erhˆhung (Verminderung) der Konzerneigenmittel von TEUR 593 (2008: TEUR 680) f¸hren.
Um die Wettbewerbsf‰higkeit und damit auch den Unternehmenserfolg sicherzustellen, reichen die Forschungs- und Entwicklungsschwerpunkte von der laufenden Verbesserung und Rationalisierung der bestehenden Fertigungsprozesse, der technischen Neu- und Weiterentwicklungen von Automobilteilen in Abstimmung und Zusammenarbeit mit den Kunden bis hin zur Weiterentwicklung von Werkstoffen.
Im Gesch‰ftsjahr 2009 konnten einige Entwicklungen erfolgreich umgesetzt werden, die im Zeichen der aktuellen Trends standen. Die gewichtigsten Trends waren dabei die CO²-Reduzierung durch Leichtbau der Komponenten, Kostenreduzierung durch intelligente Systemintegration, sowie neue ˆkologische und nachhaltige Produkt- Ans‰tze gem‰fl der aktuellen Diskussion in den einschl‰gigen Medien. Die POLYTEC GROUP unterh‰lt mehrere Entwicklungszentren. Die
Entwicklungszentren sind - entsprechend der Konzernstrategie - auf jene Produkte spezialisiert, die auch an den jeweiligen Standorten produziert werden. So verantwortet das Zentrum im norddeutschen Lohne die Entwicklung von neuen Motorraumteilen, da sich dort auch der wesentlichste Produktionsstandort f¸r Motorraumteile befindet. Die Bandbreite der Entwicklungst‰tigkeit reicht von der Substitution von Aluminium durch Kunststoff bis hin zur Weiterentwicklung von bestehenden Teilen. Der erweiterte Testingbereich erlaubt einerseits den stetig wachsenden Kundenanforderungen zu entsprechen, aber auch aktiv an Neuentwicklungen zu arbeiten und damit die Vorreiterrolle des Konzerns im Bereich der Motorraumteile weiter zu festigen.
Im bayerischen Geretsried liegt der Entwicklungsschwerpunkt auf Interieursystemen. Hier wird an der Weiterentwicklung von Werkstoffen mit Fokus auf Gewicht, Kosten und Bauteilwertigkeit gearbeitet. Im Bereich der Werkstoffentwicklung ist der Fokus klar auf die Weiterentwicklung von umweltfreundlichen Materialien auf Naturfaserbasis und von Sandwich-Werkstoffen ausgerichtet. Im Bereich der Fertigung wird insbesondere in der Weiterentwicklung des integrativen Modulkonzepts gearbeitet, um die Montagekosten weiter zu reduzieren.
IV/27
Im Gesch‰ftsjahr 2009 konnte eine T¸rverkleidung in Serie gebracht werden, bei welcher mittels eines innovativen Kaschierkonzepts eine hohe Produktwertigkeit bei geringen Kosten und geringem Bauteilgewicht umgesetzt werden konnte.
Die Weiterentwicklung von Grundlagen-Themen, unter anderem zum Einsatz von Harzen auf Basis von nachwachsenden Rohstoffen, aber auch zur Weiterentwicklung der Naturfaser-Gewinnung allgemein (Fˆrderprojekt mit der TU Chemitz zur Untersuchung des Einsatzes von Gr¸nflachs anstatt bisher hoch aufgeschlossenem Rˆstflachs etc.), runden das Entwicklungs-Portfolio weiter ab.
Im nordrheinwestf‰lischen Morsbach-Lichtenberg liegt der Entwicklungsschwerpunkt im Bereich der S‰ulenverkleidungen, insbesondere in der Hinterspritztechnik von Stoffen und sonstigen Materialien. Zudem befindet sich dort auch das Kompetenzzentrum f¸r das Ausr¸sten von speziellen Textilwaren f¸r die Hinterspritztechnik. Auch der Einsatz von D¸nnwandtechnik im Spritzgussbereich, aber auch T¸rverkleidungen aus Kunststoff werden an diesem Standort entwickelt bzw. weiterentwickelt.
Neben den zielgerichteten Vorentwicklungs-Projekten, die in enger Abstimmung mit den Automobil-Herstellern durchgef¸hrt werden, wird an neuen Werkstoffen, Oberfl‰chenmaterialien und Prozesstechniken gearbeitet. Einige Warenzeichen konnten schon erfolgreich angemeldet werden, wie zum Beispiel POLYSWIRL (÷labscheider System), POLYFLAX (Verbundstoff auf Naturfaserbasis), POLYLOAD (neuartiges Leichtbautr‰germaterial), POLYSKIN (Zwei-Komponenten-Verfahren f¸r kostenoptimierte hochwertige Innenraumteile) oder POLYGRAIN (Inmould Graining- Verfahren). Weitere sind in Vorbereitung. In Summe h‰lt die POLYTEC GROUP zurzeit mehr als 240 eingetragene Warenzeichen und Patente.
Im Bereich der Automotive Composites Division wird schwerpunktm‰flig insbesondere getrachtet, neue und bessere Einsatzmˆglichkeiten f¸r den Werkstoff Duroplaste zu finden. Weitere Entwicklungsverfahren betreffen die Effizienzsteigerung in der Produktion und Bearbeitung von SMC (Sheet Moulding
Compound), LFT (Long Fiber Thermoplastic) und GMT (Glass Mat Thermoplastic) und deren prozesssichere Verarbeitung sowie Lackierung. Die Anforderungen, die aus einer neuen Fahrzeuggeneration an die Festigkeit und Schlagz‰higkeit der Bauteile gestellt werden, erfordern ebenfalls eine laufende Weiterentwicklung des Grundmaterials und seiner Verarbeitung. Einen Schwerpunkt in der Entwicklung bildet auch die Gewichtsreduktion der Bauteile bei gleichzeitiger Beibehaltung der Bauteileeigenschaften.
Das Leistungsspektrum der Car Styling Division bietet die Mˆglichkeit, beginnend von den ersten Designskizzen ¸ber Ton-Modelle (M1:1), Digitalisieren, Cad- Konstruktion und die Erstellung von Rapid-Prototyping-Modellen die gesamte Entwicklungskette abzudecken. Im Werkzeug- und Formenbau kˆnnen die Produktionswerkzeuge und -Vorrichtungen entwickelt und gefertigt werden. Diese Prozesse werden von engagierten und erfahrenen Projektmanagern in enger Zusammenarbeit mit den Kunden und den internen Bereichen abgewickelt. Die Produktionskette erstreckt sich von der Kunststoffteilefertigung ¸ber Vorbehandlung zum Grundieren, Lackieren, Assemblieren, Verpacken inklusive der entsprechenden Logistik zum Kunden. Dadurch ist es mˆglich, flexibel zu agieren und die Kompetenzen kontinuierlich weiter zu entwickeln.
Die POLYTEC GROUP wendet rund 2,7 % (Vorjahr: 2,6 %) ihres Konzernumsatzes f¸r Forschungs- und Entwicklungsarbeiten auf.
Die Einrichtung eines angemessenen internen Kontroll- und Risikomanagementsystems im Hinblick auf den Rechnungslegungsprozess bzw. die Finanzberichterstattung liegt in der Verantwortung des Vorstands. Durch entsprechende organisatorische Maflnahmen wird sichergestellt, dass die gesetzliche Vorgabe, dass die Eintragungen in die B¸cher und die sonstigen Aufzeichnungen vollst‰ndig, richtig, zeitgerecht und geordnet zu erfolgen haben, erf¸llt wird.
Der gesamte Prozess von der Beschaffung bis zur Zahlung unterliegt strengen Regeln und Richtlinien, welche jegliche damit im Zusammenhang stehenden Risken vermeiden sollen. Zu diesen Maflnahmen und Regeln z‰hlen u.a. Funktionstrennungen, Unterschriftenordnungen, ausschliefllich kollektive und auf wenige Personen eingeschr‰nkte Zeichnungserm‰chtigungen f¸rZahlungen sowie systemunterst¸tzte Pr¸fungen durch die verwendete Software.
Durch ein standardisiertes, konzernweites Finanzberichtswesen sowie durch eine interne Adhoc Berichterstattung ¸ber bedeutende Ereignisse wird der Vorstand laufend ¸ber alle relevanten Sachverhalte informiert. Der Aufsichtsrat wird in zumindest einer pro Quartal stattfindenden Aufsichtsratssitzung ¸ber den laufenden Gesch‰ftsgang inklusive operativer Planung und mittelfristiger Strategie des Konzerns unterrichtet, in besonderen F‰llen wird der Aufsichtsrat auch unmittelbar informiert. In den Pr¸fungsausschusssitzungen wird u. a. auch das interne Kontroll und Risikomanagement behandelt.
Das Grundkapital der POLYTEC Holding AG ist in 22.329.585 Inhaberaktien mit einem Nennwert von je EUR 1,00 unterteilt. Weitere Aktiengattungen bestehen nicht. S‰mtliche Aktien sind zum Handel im Segment Prime Market der Wiener Bˆrse zugelassen.
Im J‰nner2006 erwarb die POLYTEC Holding AG von einem ausgeschiedenen Mitglied des Konzernmanagements 29.934 St¸ck eigene Aktien (0,13 % des Grundkapitals) zu einem Kaufpreis von EUR 7,20 je Aktie (Erm‰chtigung der Hauptversammlung vom 27. Oktober 2004). Der Bestand eigener Aktien ist seitdem unver‰ndert. Aktion‰re
Verwaltungsgesellschaft mbH: Die Gesellschaft h‰lt selbst, aber auch ¸ber verbundene Unternehmen, das sind die Huemer Holding GmbH sowie die Huemer Invest GmbH, Aktien an der POLYTEC Holding AG. In Summe betr‰gt der Anteil der drei Gesellschaften rund 32 % des Grundkapitals
2 . Der CEO der POLYTEC GROUP, Ing. Friedrich Huemer, ist indirekt Alleineigent¸mer der Anteile an der IMC Verwaltungsgesellschaft mbH sowie bei genannten Gesellschaften auch allein vertretungsbefugter Gesch‰ftsf¸hrer.
Im Zuge einer notwendigen Finanzierung der POLYTEC GROUP durch eine Betriebsmittellinie von rund 31 Mio. EUR kam es zu einer Sicherungs¸bereignung von 16% des Grundkapitals oder 3.572.734 Aktien durch die HUEMER Holding GmbH, ein verbundenes Unternehmen der IMC Verwaltungsgesellschaft mbH, an den Rechtsanwalt Dr. Peter Posch. Dieser ist nur hinsichtlich weniger wesentlicher
2 Inklusive des Anteils der Sicherungs¸bereignung von 16 % des Grundkapitals
Maflnahmen in der Aus¸bung seines Stimmrechtes an die HUEMER Holding GmbH gebunden. PT
Automotive Consulting GmbH: Die Gesellschaft mit Sitz in Linz/÷sterreich ist eine zum Konzernverbund der Raiffeisenlandesbank Oberˆsterreich AG gehˆrende Gesellschaft und h‰lt einen Anteil von rund 19 %. Delta
Lloyd Asset Management NV: Die Gesellschaft h‰lt als Fondsgesellschaft mit Sitz in Amsterdam/Niederlande ¸ber folgende Fonds rund 10% des Grundkapitals der POLYTEC Holding AG
Keine Inhaber von Aktien verf¸gen ¸ber besondere Kontrollrechte.
Hinsichtlich der Mˆglichkeit des Vorstandes Aktien auszugeben verweisen wir auf die Erl‰uterungen zum genehmigten Kapital im Anhang unter Abschnitt III.
Es existieren Entsch‰digungsvereinbarungen zwischen der Gesellschaft und zwei Mitgliedern des Vorstandes im Falle eines Kontrollwechsels. Es gibt keine Entsch‰digungsvereinbarungen f¸r die Aufsichtsratsmitglieder und Arbeitnehmer. Weitere bedeutende Vereinbarungen, auf die ein Kontrollwechsel oder ein ˆffentliches‹bernahmeangebot eine Auswirkung h‰tten, bestehen nicht.
Es bestehen keine Satzungsbestimmungen, die ¸ber die gesetzlichen Bestimmungen zur Ernennung von Vorstand oder Aufsichtsrat sowie zur ƒnderung der Satzung hinausgehende Regelungen enthalten.
Hˆrsching, am 6. April 2010
Der Vorstand
Ing. Friedrich Huemer e.h. Mag. Eduard Schreiner e.h.
Ing. Alfred Kollros e.h. Ing. Andreas Jagle.h.
Holding AG, Hˆrsching
mit Gegen¸berstellung der Vorjahreszahlen in tausend Euro (TEUR) AktivaPassiva
| A. Anlagevermˆgen: |
31.12.2009 | 31.12.2008 | A. Eigenkapital: |
31.12.2009 | 31.12.2008 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ˆgens- | EUR | TEUR | EUR | TEUR | |
| ‰nde | ¸cklagen (gebunden) |
||||
| I. Immaterielle Verm |
¸cklage f¸r eigene Anteile I. Grundkapital |
22.329.585,00 | 22.330 | ||
| gegenst | 215.363,22 | 354 | II. Kapitalr |
38.869.949,79 | 38.870 |
| II. Sachanlagen |
49.112.116,74 535.719,83 |
646 | III. R |
63.160,74 | 69 |
| B. Umlaufvermˆgen: III. Finanzanlagen |
48.361.033,69 | 195.901 | IV. Bilanzgewinn (davon Gewinnvortrag |
62.888.736,89 | |
| 196.900 | B. R¸ckstellungen: EUR 0,00; Vorjahr: TEUR 79.304) |
1.626.041,36 | 0 | ||
| ˆgensgegenst‰nde: | ¸ckstellungen f¸r Abfertigungen |
61.268 | |||
| I. Forderungen und sonstige |
¸ckstellungen | ||||
| Verm | ¸ckstellungen 1. R |
267.135,00 | 400 | ||
| ¸ber 1. Forderungen aus Liefer- |
2. Steuerr |
3.456.880,00 769.300,00 |
778 | ||
| ungen und Leistungen |
339.011,27 | 0 | C. Verbindlichkeiten: 3. Sonstige R |
2.420.445,00 | 2.489 |
| 2. Forderungen gegen |
¸ber Kreditinstituten |
3.667 | |||
| ˆgensgegenst‰nde verbundenen Unternehmen |
23.758.024,85 | 26.367 | |||
| 3. Sonstige Forderungen und |
25.011.555,06 | 1. Verbindlichkeiten gegen |
2.159.455,52 | 60.142 | |
| Verm | 914.518,94 | 15.998 | ¸ber 2. Verbindlichkeiten aus Liefe- |
||
| 63.160,74 | 42.365 | rungen und Leistungen |
345.321,97 | 527 | |
| II. Wertpapiere und Anteile: |
1.332.654,64 | 3. Verbindlichkeiten gegen |
|||
| Eigene Anteile |
26.407.370,44 | 69 | verbundenen Unternehmen |
6.479.694,94 | 113.932 |
| C. Rechnungsabgrenzungsposten III. Guthaben bei Kreditinstituten |
19.564,46 | 457 | 4. Sonstige Verbindlichkeiten (davon aus Steuern |
||
| 42.891 | EUR 150.863,53; Vorjahr: TEUR 102; |
||||
| 67 | davon im Rahmen der sozialen Sicherheit |
9.193.434,75 | |||
| 75.539.051,64 | EUR 47.057,82; Vorjahr: TEUR 43) |
75.539.051,64 208.962,32 |
321 | ||
| ‰ltnisse | 174.922 | ||||
| 239.858 | 239.858 | ||||
| Haftungsverh | 125.379.942,48 | 234.228 |
I
| ˆse ‰ge |
2009 EUR |
2008 TEUR |
||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1. | Umsatzerl | 7.572.002,51 | 8.276 | |
| 2. | Sonstige betriebliche Ertr |
963.065,87 | 1.335 | |
| 3. | Personalaufwand ‰nde des Anlagever- |
-3.605.069,73 | -2.809 | |
| 4. | ˆgens und Sachanlagen Abschreibungen auf immaterielle Gegenst ‹brige) m (Betriebsergebnis) |
-400.873,09 279.702,29 |
-495 | |
| 5. | Sonstige betriebliche Aufwendungen ( ‰ge aus Beteiligungen (davon |
-4.249.423,27 | -5.430 | |
| 6. | Zwischensumme aus Z 1 bis Z 5 |
877 | ||
| 7. | Ertr aus verbundenen Unternehmen ‰hnliche Ertr‰ge EUR 4.651.158,38; Vorjahr: TEUR 5.890) |
4.651.158,38 | 6.004 | |
| 8. | Sonstige Zinsen und (davon ‰ge aus aus verbundenen dem Abgang Unternehmen von und der EUR 1.052.359,67; Vorjahr: TEUR 1.460) |
1.253.829,54 | 4.197 | |
| 9. | ˆgens Ertr Zuschreibung zu Finanzanlagen und Wertpapieren des Umlaufverm (davon aus verbundenen Unternehmen EUR 4.090.092,52; Vorjahr: TEUR ˆgens 5.800) (davon Ab- |
4.090.092,52 | 5.992 | |
| 10. | Aufwendungen aus Finanzanlagen und aus Wertpapieren des Umlaufverm schreibungen EUR 962.271,82; Vorjahr: TEUR 105.449; davon Aufwendungen ‰hnliche Aufwendungen aus verbundenen Unter- nehmen EUR 5.872.771,82; Vorjahr: TEUR 115.066) |
-5.878.459,28 | -115.210 | |
| 11. 13. |
Zinsen und (Finanzergebnis) (davon betreffend verbundene Unternehmen EUR 2.261.417,96; Vorjahr: TEUR 1.497) Ergebnis der gewˆhnlichen Gesch‰ftst‰tigkeit |
-67.708,51 -4.184.329,67 211.993,78 |
-3.995 | |
| 12. | Zwischensumme aus Z 7 bis Z 11 flerordentliche Ertr‰ge = |
-103.012 | ||
| Auflerordentliches Ergebnis |
1.438.187,52 | -102.136 | ||
| 14. 16. |
Au Jahres¸berschuss (-fehlbetrag) |
1.620.353,90 | 0 | |
| 15. | Steuern vom Einkommen ˆsung von Kapitalr¸cklagen (gebunden) |
-29.827,40 | 1.378 | |
| ˆsung von Gewinnr¸cklagen |
-100.757 | |||
| 17. | Aufl ¸cklage) |
0,00 | 20.220 | |
| 18. | Aufl ‹bertrag aus R¸cklage f¸r eigene Anteile (gesetzliche R |
0,00 | 1.090 | |
| 19. 21. |
Bilanzgewinn | 5.687,46 1.626.041,36 |
143 | |
| 20. | Gewinnvortrag aus dem Vorjahr |
0,00 | 79.304 | |
| 0 |
Der vorliegende Jahresabschluss 2009 ist nach den Vorschriften des UGB aufgestellt worden. Die Gesellschaft ist als grofle Kapitalgesellschaft gem‰fl ß 221 UGB einzustufen.
Im Interesse einer klaren Darstellung wurden in der Bilanz und in der Gewinn- und Verlustrechnung einzelne Posten zusammengefasst. Diese Posten sind im Anhang gesondert aus gewiesen.
Die Gewinn- und Verlustrechnung ist in Staffelform nach dem Gesamtkostenverfahren aufge stellt.
Der Jahresabschluss wurde unter Beachtung der Grunds‰tze ordnungsm‰fliger Buchf¸hrung sowie der Generalnorm, ein mˆglichst getreues Bild der Vermˆgens-, Finanz- und Ertragslage des Unternehmens zu vermitteln, aufgestellt. Bei der Erstellung des Jahresabschlusses wurde der Grundsatz der Vollst‰ndigkeit eingehal-
ten. Bei der Bewertung wurde von der Fortf¸hrung des Unternehmens ausgegangen. Die
Bei den Vermˆgensgegenst‰nden und Schulden wurde der Grundsatz der Einzelbewertung Anwendung dieser Bewertungspr‰misse beruht auf der im Jahr 2009 positiv abgeschlossenen Restrukturierung und Entschuldung der Gesellschaft. In diesem Zusammenhang verweisen wir auf die Ausf¸hrungen in Kapitel V.
angewandt. Hinsichtlich der Bewertung der Beteiligungsans‰tze wird auf Beilage III/3 verwiesen.
Die bisher angewandten Bewertungsmethoden wurden beibehalten.
Alle erkennbaren Risken und drohenden Verluste wurden ber¸cksichtigt. Dem Vorsichtsgrundsatz wurde Rechnung getragen, indem insbesondere nur die am Ab schlussstichtag verwirklichten Gewinne ausgewiesen werden.
Immaterielle Vermˆgensgegenst‰nde werden, soweit gegen Entgelt erworben, zu Anschaffungskosten aktiviert und in l‰ngstens f¸nf Jahren abgeschrieben.
Die planm‰fligen Abschreibungen werden linear unter Zugrundelegung folgender Nutzungs- Sachanlagen werden zu Anschaffungs- oder Herstellungskosten, abz¸glich planm‰fliger Ab schreibungen, bewertet.
dauern und Abschreibungss‰tze berechnet:
| ‰ftsausstattung | Nutzungs- dauer in Jahren |
Abschrei- bungssatz % |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Andere Anlagen, Betriebs- ‰ngen ‰lfte und Gesch |
‰ftsjahres 2 - 10 |
10,0 - 50,0 |
|
| Von den Zug in der ersten H des Gesch |
wird die volle |
Jahresabschrei- |
Geringwertige Vermˆgensgegenst‰nde werden im Jahr der Anschaffung voll abgeschrieben. bung, von den Zug‰ngen in der zweiten H‰lfte wird die halbe Jahresabschreibung verrechnet.
Auflerplanm‰flige Abschreibungen werden vorgenommen, soweit der Ansatz mit einem niedrigeren Wert erforderlich ist. Finanzanlagen werden grunds‰tzlich mit den Anschaffungskosten, gegebenenfalls vermindert
um Abschreibungen zur Ber¸cksichtigung dauernder Wertminderungen, bewertet.
Forderungen und sonstige Vermˆgensgegenst‰nde werden mit dem Nennbetrag angesetzt. Im Abschluss 2008 wurde hinsichtlich der Beteiligung Peguform von diesem Grundsatz in Anwendung des ß 201 Abs. 2 letzter Satz UGB abgewichen. Da auf Basis der mit den wesentlichen Gl‰ubigerbanken der POLYTEC-Gruppe im Mai 2009 erreichten Sanierungsvereinbarung klar war, dass die Peguform-Gruppe gegen Abgabe von Verbindlichkeiten von rd. EUR 170 Mio. aus dem Vermˆgen der POLYTEC Holding AG abgehen wird, wurden die entsprechenden Vermˆgensgegenst‰nde und die zugeordneten Finanzverbindlichkeiten als Bewertungseinheit angesehen. Folglich wurden die Vermˆgensgegenst‰nde (Finanzanlagen und sonstige Forderungen) in Hˆhe der zuzuordnenden Finanzverbindlichkeiten bewertet und eine Abwertung aufden niedrigeren beizulegenden Wert unterlassen. Aus Sicht des Vorstandes ist mit diesem Vorgehen gew‰hrleistet, dass der Jahresabschluss ein mˆglichst getreues Bild der Vermˆgens-, Finanz und Ertragslage der POLYTEC Holding AG vermittelt. Bez¸glich der Auswirkungen aus der erfolgten Restrukturierung der POLYTEC Holding AG und dem Abgang der Peguform-Gruppe verweisen wir auf die Erl‰uterungen zum auflerordentlichen Ergebnis.
Fremdw‰hrungsforderungen werden unter Ber¸cksichtigung des Niederstwertprinzips mit dem Referenzkurs der Europ‰ischen Zentralbank zum Bilanzstichtag bewertet. F¸r erkennbare Risken werden Einzelwertberichtigungen gebildet. Wertpapiere und Anteile des Umlaufvermˆgens werden mit ihren Anschaffungskosten oder
Bei der Bemessung der R¸ckstellungen werden entsprechend den gesetzlichen Erfordernissen dem niedrigeren beizulegendem Wert am Bilanzstichtag bewertet.
alle erkennbaren Risken und drohenden Verluste ber¸cksichtigt.
R¸ckstellungen f¸rJubil‰umsgelder werden gebildet; die Vorsorge wird wie im Vorjahrnach Die R¸ckstellungen f¸r Abfertigungen wurden wie im Vorjahr nach anerkannten finanzmathematischen Grunds‰tzen auf Basis eines Rechnungszinssatzes von 3,0 %, eines Pensionseintrittsalters von 60 Jahren bei Frauen und 65 Jahren bei M‰nnern, ermittelt.
Verbindlichkeiten werden mit ihrem R¸ckzahlungsbetrag angesetzt. Fremdw‰hrungsverbindanerkannten finanzmathematischen Grunds‰tzen unter Zugrundelegung eines Rechnungszinssatzes von 3,0r% und eines Fluktuationsabschlages von 20,0i% berechnet.
lichkeiten werden unter Ber¸cksichtigung des Hˆchstwertprinzips mit dem Referenzkurs der Europ‰ischen Zentralbank zum Bilanzstichtag bewertet.
Anlagevermˆgen
Die Aufgliederung des Anlagevermˆgens und seine Entwicklung im Berichtsjahr sind im Anlagenspiegel angef¸hrt (vergleiche Anlage*1 zum Anhang).
Aus der Nutzung von nicht in der Bilanz ausgewiesenen Sachanlagen besteht auf Grund von langfristigen Mietvertr‰gen f¸r das Gesch‰ftsjahr 2010 eine Verpflichtung von EUR 412.389,84 (Vorjahr: TEUR 240). Der Gesamtbetrag der Verpflichtungen f¸r die n‰chsten 5 Jahre betr‰gt EUR 1.237.169,52 (Vorjahr: TEUR 240). Der Gesamtbetrag der sonstigen Ausleihungen mit einer Restlaufzeit bis zu einem Jahr betr‰gt
EUR 700.000,00 (Vorjahr: TEUR 1.083).
| hievon mit einer Rest- laufzeit bis zu einem Jahr EUR |
hievon mit einer Restlauf zeit von mehr als einem Jahr EUR |
Bilanzwert EUR |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Forderungen aus Lieferungen und Leistungen ¸ber ver- |
339.011,27 | 0,00 | 339.011,27 |
| Vorjahr in TEUR |
0 | 0 | 0 |
| Forderungen gegen bundenen Unternehmen |
17.415.950,85 | 6.342.074,00 | 23.758.024,85 |
| Vorjahr in TEUR ˆgensgegenst‰nde |
19.655 | 6.712 | 26.367 |
| Sonstige Forderungen und Verm |
914.518,94 | 0,00 | 914.518,94 |
| Vorjahr in TEUR |
15.998 | 0 | 15.998 |
| 18.669.481,06 | 6.342.074,00 | 25.011.555,06 | |
| Vorjahr in TEUR |
35.653 | 6.712 | 42.365 |
GrundkapitalIm Posten "Sonstige Forderungen und Vermˆgensgegenst‰nde" sind Ertr‰ge in Hˆhe von EUR 68.115,00 (Vorjahr: TEUR 24) enthalten, die erst nach dem Bilanzstichtag zahlungs wirksam werden.
Das Grundkapital betr‰gt zum 31.12.2009 EUR 22.329.585,00 und ist in 22.239.585 St¸ck aktien zum Nennbetrag von je EUR 1,00 zerlegt. Die Aktien lauten auf Inhaber. Das Grundkapital der Gesellschaft blieb im Gesch‰ftsjahr 2009 unver‰ndert.
Mit Beschluss der ordentlichen Hauptversammlung vom 21.5.2008 wurde ein genehmigtes Kapital beschlossen. Der Vorstand ist berechtigt mit Zustimmung des Aufsichtsrats l‰ngstens f¸nf Jahre ab Eintragung des genehmigten Kapitals das Grundkapital um bis zu Nominale EUR 11.164.792,00 durch Ausgabe neuer Aktien zu einem Mindestausgabebetrag von je EUR 1,00 zu erhˆhen. Die Ausgabe der neuen Aktien kann auch unter Ausschluss des Bezugrechts der Aktion‰re erfolgen. Die Gesellschaft hat im J‰nner2006 von einem ausgeschiedenen Mitglied des Konzern-
managements 29.934 St¸ck eigene Aktien mit einem Nennbetrag von je EUR 1,00 (0,13 % des Grundkapitals) zu einem Kaufpreis von EUR 7,20 je Aktie erworben (Erm‰chtigung der auflerordentlichen Hauptversammlung vom 27.10.2004). Der Bestand an eigenen Aktien ist seitdem unver‰ndert.
SonstigeDie Steuerr¸ckstellungen betreffen zum 31.12.2009 neben einer R¸ckstellung f¸r Steuernachzahlungen aus Vorjahren ausschliefllich R¸ckstellungen f¸r latente Steuern, welche auf Grund der tempor‰ren Ber¸cksichtigung von steuerlichen Verlusten ausl‰ndischer Gesellschaften gem‰fl der kˆrperschaftsteuerlichen Gruppenbesteuerung zu bilden waren. Auf die Erl‰uterungen zu "Steuern vom Einkommen" wird verwiesen.
VerbindlichkeitenDie sonstigen R¸ckstellungen umfassen im Wesentlichen Vorsorgen f¸r nicht konsumierte Urlaube, Erfolgspr‰mien, Risiken aus Finanzkontrakten sowie Vorsorgen f¸r Risiken aus abgegebenen B¸rgschaften.
| ¸ber | hievon mit einer Rest- laufzeit bis zu einem Jahr EUR |
hievon mit einer Rest- ¸nf Jahren laufzeit von ein bis f EUR |
hievon mit ¸ber einer Rest- ¸nf Jahren laufzeit von f EUR |
Bilanzwert EUR |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Verbindlichkeiten gegen Kreditinstituten |
2.159.455,52 | 0,00 | 0,00 | 2.159.455,52 |
| Vorjahr in TEUR |
60.142 | 0 | 0 | 60.142 |
| Verbindlichkeiten aus Liefe rungen und Leistungen ¸ber |
345.321,97 | 0,00 | 0,00 | 345.321,97 |
| Vorjahr in TEUR |
527 | 0 | 0 | 527 |
| Verbindlichkeiten gegen verbundenen Unternehmen |
6.479.694,94 | 0,00 | 0,00 | 6.479.694,94 |
| Vorjahr in TEUR |
113.932 | 0 | 0 | 113.932 |
| Sonstige Verbindlichkeiten |
208.962,32 | 0,00 | 0,00 | 208.962,32 |
| Vorjahr in TEUR |
321 | 0 | 0 | 321 |
| 9.193.434,75 | 0,00 | 0,00 | 9.193.434,75 | |
| Vorjahr in TEUR |
174.922 | 0 | 0 | 174.922 |
Im Posten "Sonstige Verbindlichkeiten" sind Aufwendungen in Hˆhe von EUR 77.656,38 (Vorjahr: TEUR 235) enthalten, die erst nach dem Bilanzstichtag zahlungswirksam werden.
| ¸rgschaften ¸rgschaften |
31.12.2009 EUR |
31.12.2008 TEUR |
|---|---|---|
| Wechselb ¸rgschaften |
10.736.000,00 | 10.736 |
| Ausfallsb | 41.195.902,69 | 110.944 |
| Sonstige B ¸r Leasingverpflichtungen |
36.791.525,21 | 24.534 |
| Garantien ¸rgschaft Factoring |
4.841.521,86 | 76.500 |
| Haftung f |
7.115.103,62 | 11.514 |
| Ausfallb | 24.699.889,10 | 0 |
| 125.379.942,48 | 234.228 |
Die Wechselb¸rgschaften bestehen gegen¸ber inl‰ndischen Kreditinstituten. Die Ausfallsb¸rgschaften bestehen gegen¸ber in- und ausl‰ndischen Banken. Die sonstigen B¸rgschaften betreffen im Wesentlichen Mietverpflichtungen. Die Garantien bestehen gegen¸ber einem inl‰ndischen Unternehmen und einem ausl‰ndischen Kreditinstitut. Die Haftung f¸r Leasingverpflichtungen betrifft die Mithaftung als zweiter Leasingnehmer. Die Ausfallb¸rgschaft Factoring betrifft das Restrisiko einer Inanspruchnahme der Gesellschaft f¸r den Fall, dass an Konzerngesellschaften bevorschusste, jedoch dem Grunde nach nicht gerechtfertigte Forderungen, weder beim Schuldner der Forderung noch bei der Konzerngesellschaft einbringlich sind. Das Delkredererisiko, den Rechtsbestand der Forderung vorausgesetzt, wird von der Factoringgesellschaft getragen. S‰mtliche Haftungsverh‰ltnisse betreffen Risiko¸bernahmen von verbundenen Unternehmen.
IV. Erl‰uterungen zur Gewinn- und Verlustrechnung Auflerbilanzielle Gesch‰fte nach ß 237 Z 8a UGB aus denen wesentliche Risiken oder Vorteile resultieren kˆnnten, liegen zum Bilanzstichtag nicht vor.
| 2009 | 2008 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| EUR | TEUR | ||
| Inland | 1.755.329,97 | 1.938 | |
| Ausland | 5.816.672,54 | 6.338 | |
| 7.572.002,51 | 8.276 |
| ‰ge aus dem Abgang vom Anlagevermˆgen |
2009 | 2008 |
|---|---|---|
| ‰ge aus der Auflˆsung von R¸ckstellungen |
EUR | TEUR |
| Ertr ‹brige |
2.999,98 | 28 |
| Ertr | 616.000,00 | 1.132 |
| 344.065,89 | 175 | |
| Personalaufwand | 963.065,87 | 1.335 |
| ‰lter ¸r Abfertigungen und Leistungen |
2009 EUR |
2008 TEUR |
| Geh | 3.014.627,74 | 2.263 |
| Aufwendungen f ¸r gesetzlich vorgeschrie- an betriebliche Mitarbeitervorsorgekassen |
77.113,04 | 71 |
| ‰ngige Abgaben und Pflichtbeitr‰ge Aufwendungen f bene Sozialabgaben sowie vom Entgelt |
||
| abh | 507.693,94 | 475 |
| Sonstige Sozialaufwendungen |
5.635,01 | 0 |
| 3.605.069,73 | 2.809 |
Von den Aufwendungen f¸r Abfertigungen und Leistungen an betriebliche Mitarbeitervorsorge kassen entfielen im Gesch‰ftsjahr EUR 31.620,00 (Vorjahr: TEUR 36) auf Mitglieder des Vor stands und leitende Angestellte. Im Posten "Aufwendungen f¸r Abfertigungen und Leistungen an betriebliche Mitarbeitervor-
Sonstige betriebliche Aufwendungen sorgekassen" sind EUR 48.904,04 (Vorjahr: TEUR 58) an Aufwendungen f¸rAbfertigungen enthalten.
Auflerordentliches Ergebnis Die ¸brigen sonstigen betrieblichen Aufwendungen beinhalten im Wesentlichen Gesch‰ftsf¸hrungs-, Versicherungs-, Miet-, Beratungs- und Aufwendungen f¸r Softwarewartung.
Im auflerordentlichen Ergebnis des Gesch‰ftsjahres sind alle Aufwendungen und Ertr‰ge abge bildet, die mit der Restrukturierung und der damit verbundenen Abgabe der Peguform-Gruppe in Zusammenhang stehen. Die Restrukturierung basiert auf einem mit den Hauptgl‰ubigerbanken vereinbarten und mit Zustimmung der auflerordentlichen Hauptversammlung vom 26.6.2009 abgeschlossenen Konzept zur Entschuldung der POLYTEC Holding AG.
Das auflerordentliche Ergebnis schl¸sselt sich wie folgt auf:
| Auflerordentliche Aufwendungen: |
EUR | |
|---|---|---|
| ‡.r.l., Luxembourg: |
||
| Buchwertabgang Peguform Luxembourg Holding S. |
||
| Anteile | -74.600.000,00 | |
| Preffered Equity Certificate Class D ˆrsching: |
-45.356.082,81 | |
| Preffered Equity Certificate Class C |
-36.363.000,00 | |
| PF-Beteiligungs GmbH, H |
||
| Abgang Forderung Kaufpreis |
||
| finanzierung Peguform |
-14.003.274,95 | |
| Beratungsaufwand Restrukturierung |
-2.751.305,05 -173.090.312,81 |
|
| Sonstige Kosten Restrukturierung Auflerordentliche Ertr‰ge: |
-16.650,00 | |
| ¸bernahme | ||
| Privative Schuld ¸bernommene Zinsen |
110.000.000,00 | |
| Schuldverzicht Kreditinstitute |
59.500.000,00 | |
| Verzichtete und |
4.852.589,38 | |
| Weiterverrechnete Aufwendungen |
174.528.500,33 | |
| Restrukturierung | 175.910,95 | |
| Steuern vom Einkommen |
1.438.187,52 | |
| ˆrperschaftsteuer: | 2009 EUR |
2008 TEUR |
| K | ||
| Laufendes Jahr |
3.500,00 | 4 |
| Aus Vorperioden |
327.727,40 | -1 |
| Steuerumlagen Gruppenbesteuerung |
37.100,00 | 25 |
| Latenter Steueraufwand (Gruppenbesteuerung) |
-338.500,00 | -1.406 |
| 29.827,40 | -1.378 |
Der Aufwand f¸r Steuerumlagen betrifft inl‰ndische verbundene Unternehmen, der Verbrauch der R¸ckstellung f¸rlatente Steuern ausl‰ndische verbundene Unternehmen, welche in die Steuergruppe der Gesellschaft einbezogen sind.
Der im Gesch‰ftsjahr ausgewiesene laufende Steueraufwand betrifft ausschliefllich das Die Steuerumlagen werden nach der sogenannten Belastungsmethode verrechnet, wobei im Fall eines steuerlichen Gewinns das inl‰ndische Gruppenmitglied eine Steuerumlage an den Gruppentr‰ger zu entrichten hat. Im Fall eines steuerlichen Verlustes eines inl‰ndischen Gruppenmitglieds hat der Gruppentr‰ger eine Ausgleichszahlung an das Gruppenmitglied zu leisten.
ordentliche Ergebnis.
Der Gesamtbetrag der aktivierbaren latenten Steuern zum 31.12.2009 betr‰gt EURr9.474.117,00 (Vorjahr: TEUR 12.174). Davon stammen aus den bei der Gesellschaft steuerlich zu erfassenden Personengesellschaften aktivierbare aktive latente Steuern in Hˆhe von EUR 405.425,00 (Vorjahr: TEUR 528). Bis zum 31.12.2009 wurden in der Steuergruppe (ß 9 KStG) der Gesellschaft aus dem Jahr
2009 und fr¸heren Gesch‰ftsjahren ausl‰ndische Verluste in Hˆhe von TEUR 18.584 (Vorjahr: TEUR 7.011) einbezogen, f¸r die keine R¸ckstellung f¸rlatente Steuer gebildet wurde, da durch die ‹bernahme dieser steuerlichen Verluste noch kein steuerlicher Vorteil im Inland erzielt wurde bzw. da mit einer zeitnahen Umkehr der Steuerentlastung nicht ernsthaft zu rechnen ist.
EreignisseDie Gesellschaft ist Mutterunternehmen des POLYTEC-Konzerns im Sinn des ß 228 UGB. Der von der POLYTEC Holding AG, als oberstes Mutterunternehmen, verpflichtend aufzustellende Konzernabschluss wird beim Firmenbuch des Landes- als Handelsgerichtes Linz hinterlegt.
Anfang 2009 wurde die geordnete Schlieflung des Standortes in Schweden beschlossen, die auch mit Jahresende 2009 abgeschlossen wurde. Nach der Schlieflung des Standortes in 2009 wurde an Stelle der Liquidation am 14. J‰nner 2010 die Insolvenz der Polytec Composites Sweden AB angemeldet. F¸r absehbare Kosten in diesem Zusammenhang wurde im vorliegenden Jahresabschluss vorgesorgt.
Die Gesellschaft setzt derivative Finanzinstrumente sowohl zur Absicherung von Fremdw‰hrungs- und Zins‰nderungsrisiken als auch zur Verbesserung des Nettozinsergebnisses der POLYTEC-Gruppe im Rahmen der Aufgaben des Konzerntreasury ein. Zum 31.12.2009 be standen folgende derivative Finanzinstrumente:
| ¸ckstellung Buchwert R |
beizulegen- der Wert |
||
|---|---|---|---|
| Nominale | 31.12.2009 | 31.12.2009 | |
| Kategorie der Finanzinstrumente |
EUR | EUR | EUR |
| Zinssatz-Swap | 10.000.000,00 | 691.149,44 | -691.149,44 |
| ‰fl ß Zinssatz-Swap |
5.000.000,00 | 180.328,17 | -180.328,17 |
| Die beizulegenden Zeitwerte gem 237a Abs |
3 UGB entsprechen |
den rechnerischen |
Markt- |
Unternehmensfortf¸hrungwerten am Bilanzstichtag.
Die anhaltende globale Finanz- und Wirtschaftskrise und die starke wirtschaftliche Verlangsamung stellen f¸r den Konzern der POLYTEC Holding AG und damit f¸r die Gesellschaft eine grofle Herausforderung dar. Die Entwicklung des Konzerns der POLYTEC Holding AG war in 2009 von einem massiven Einbruch der PKW- und Nutzfahrzeugkonjunktur gepr‰gt, die zu wesentlichen Umsatz- und Ergebnisverschlechterungen f¸hrten. In 2009 wurde unter Ber¸cksichtigung der zur Ver‰uflerung gehaltenen Gesch‰ftsbereiche ein negatives Konzernergebnis nach Steuern von MEUR -90,1 erzielt. Aufgrund der derzeitigen wirtschaftlichen Situation und der schwer einsch‰tzbaren Entwicklung
im PKW- und Nutzfahrzeugbereich kˆnnen Ver‰nderungen in der k¸nftigen Ertragslage und im k¸nftigen Finanzierungsbedarf eintreten, die aus heutiger Sicht nicht abschlieflend eingesch‰tzt werden kˆnnen. Auf Basis der Planungsrechnungen soll f¸r 2010 aufder Konzernebene ein positiver Betriebserfolg (EBIT) erzielt werden. Die Liquidit‰tsvorschau f¸r 2010 zeigt auf Basis der urspr¸nglichen Planungsrechnungen einen zus‰tzlichen Bedarf an liquiden Mittel von ca. MEUR 18,5, der in den bestehenden Rahmen ausreichend Deckung findet. Es istanzumerken, dass die Planungsrechnungen und die daraus resultierenden Liquidit‰tsplanungen noch unverhandelte Maflnahmen (z.B. Umsatzzuw‰chse und Personalkostenreduktionen) beinhalten. Der tats‰chliche Ausgang dieser Verhandlungen kann einen wesentlichen Einfluss aufdie k¸nftige Ertragslage und den Finanzbedarf der Gesellschaft und des Konzerns haben. Die Planungsrechnungen wurden vom verantwortlichen lokalen Management und dem Vorstand auf Grundlage der derzeit schwer einsch‰tzbaren Entwicklung der Automobil- und Nutzfahrzeugbranche nach bestem Wissen erstellt und entsprechen dem aktuellen Wissensstand. Aufgrund der bestehenden allgemeinen Unsicherheit aufgrund der Krise kann nicht ausgeschlossen werden, dass Tochtergesellschaften der Gesellschaft in ihrem Fortbestand gef‰hrdet sind. Daher sind nachteilige k¸nftige Wertminderungen der bilanzierten Vermˆgenswerte - insbesondere der Anteile an verbundenen Unternehmen sowie der Forderungen gegen¸ber verbundenen Unternehmen - bzw. Inanspruchnahmen aus Haftungen mˆglich. In den ersten beiden Monaten in 2010 lag das Ergebnis auf Konzernebene leicht hinter Plan.
Weiters ist f¸r den positiven Fortbestand der Gesellschaft und des Konzerns die Finanzierung durch die Hausbank wesentlich. Die finanzierende Hausbank hat als Hauptgl‰ubiger mit Schreiben vom 9. M‰rz 2010 auch schriftlich best‰tigt, dass sie beabsichtigt, bei einer den urspr¸nglichen Planungsrechnungen entsprechenden Entwicklung des Konzerns der POLYTEC Holding AG die Finanzierungszusagen weiterhin aufrecht zu erhalten, vorbehaltlich Gremialzustimmung auch bis 31.Dezember 2011. Planabweichungen einzelner Gesellschaften und/oder Standorte des Konzerns der POLYTEC Holding AG werden von der finanzierenden Hausbank nicht als alleinige Begr¸ndung f¸r eine K¸ndigung von Finanzierungszusagen herangezogen werden, sofern die Entwicklung des gesamten Konzerns der POLYTEC Holding AG weiterhin nicht signifikant von den urspr¸nglichen Planungsrechnungen abweicht. Im Falle, dass es zu weiteren Ergebnisr¸ckg‰ngen und/oder zu keiner Weiterfinanzierung k‰me, w‰re der Bestand der Gesellschaft und des Konzerns gef‰hrdet.
Gesch‰fteAuf Basis der vorliegenden Planungsrechnungen und aufgrund der dargestellten Finanzierungszusage der Hausbank geht der Vorstand von der Fortf¸hrung des Unternehmens aus.
ArbeitnehmerWesentliche Gesch‰fte mit nahe stehenden Personen und Unternehmen werden mit Firmen, die sich im mittelbaren oder unmittelbaren Beteiligungsbesitz des Vorstandsvorsitzenden befinden, get‰tigt (sogenannte IMC-Gruppe). Sie betreffen neben der werkvertraglich geregelten Stellung des Vorstandsvorsitzenden die Anmietung des Betriebsgeb‰udes der POLYTEC Holding AG. Dar¸ber hinaus hat die POLYTEC Holding AG Haftungen f¸r Mietverh‰ltnisse, welche von Konzerngesellschaften mitder IMC-Gruppe geschlossenen wurden, ¸bernommen. S‰mtliche get‰tigten Gesch‰fte wurden zu markt¸blichen Bedingungen abgeschlossen.
| 2009 | 2008 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Angestellte (im Jahresdurchschnitt) Mitglieder |
33 | 30 |
des Vorstands waren w‰hrend des Gesch‰ftsjahres und zum Zeitpunkt der Erstellung des Jahresabschlusses:
Herr Ing. Friedrich H u e m e r , Wallern (Vorstandsvorsitzender) Herr Ing. Andreas J a g l , Grˆbming (seit 2.11.2009) Herr Ing. Alfred K ol l ro s , St. Valentin Herr Mag. Klaus R in n e r b e r g e r ,Brunn am Gebirge (von 1.3.2009 bis 31.8.2009) Herr Mag. Eduard S c h r e i n e r , Leonding (seit 15.10.2009) Herr Ing. Karl-Heinz S ol l y , Leonding (bis 31.12.2009) Herr Dipl.-Ing. Reinhard U r m a n n , Maxh¸tte-Haidhof, Deutschland (bis 1.3.2009)
Der Gesamtbetrag der Bez¸ge des Vorstands im Gesch‰ftsjahr betrug TEUR 1.948 (Vorjahr: TEUR 1.286). Vom angegebenen Betrag wurden TEUR 32 (Vorjahr: TEUR 193) nicht von der Gesellschaft selbst, sondern von verbundenen Unternehmen der Gesellschaft aufgewendet. In den Bez¸gen 2009 ist eine Einmalzahlung an ein im Zuge der Restrukturierung von Polytec
ausgeschiedenes Vorstandsmitglied in Hˆhe von TEUR 675 enthalten. Der Vorstandsvorsitzende hatim Jahr 2009 als Beitrag zur Bew‰ltigung der schwierigen
Mitglieder des Aufsichtsrats waren w‰hrend des Gesch‰ftsjahres und zum Zeitpunkt der Situation der Polytec Gruppe auf 20 % des ihm zustehenden Fixbezuges verzichtet.
Erstellung des Jahresabschlusses:
Herr Mag. Fred D u sw a l d , Thalheim (Vorsitzender) Herr Manfred Helmut T r a u t h , Knittelsheim, Deutschland (Stellvertreter des Vorsitzenden) Herr Prof. Dr. Robert B ¸c h e l h o f e r , Starnberg, Deutschland Frau Dr. Viktoria K i ck i n g e r ,Wien Herr Univ.-Prof. Mag. Dr. Meinhard L u k a s , Linz (seit 8.2.2010) Herr Mag. Reinhard S c h w e n d t b a u e r , Leonding (seit 8.2.2010) Herr Dr. Andreas S z i g m u n d , Linz (bis 8.2.2010)
Es bestehen keine Kredite oder Vorsch¸sse an aktuelle oder fr¸here Mitglieder der Organe der Die erfassten Aufwendungen f¸rVerg¸tungen an Mitglieder des Aufsichtsrats betrugen im Gesch‰ftsjahr EUR 101.750,00 (Vorjahr: TEUR 74).
Gesellschaft. Keine fr¸heren Mitglieder der Organe der Gesellschaft erhalten Bez¸ge von der Gesellschaft oder einem ihrer verbundenen Unternehmen.
Hˆrsching, am 6. April 2010
Der Vorstand
Ing. Friedrich Huemer e.h. Ing. Andreas Jagl e.h.
Ing. Alfred Kollros e.h. MagM.aEgd.uEadrduaSrdchSrecihnreerinee.hr .e.h.
Anlage 1 zum Anhang:Anlagenspiegel Anlage 2 zum Anhang:Beteiligungsliste
| Anschaffungs- und |
Herstellungskosten | Abschreibungen | Nettowert | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ‰nge ‰nge |
‰nge ‰nge |
|||||||||||
| I. Immaterielle Ver- mˆgensgegenst‰nde: |
Stand am 1.1.2009 EUR |
Zug EUR |
Abg EUR |
Stand am 31.12.2009 EUR |
Stand am 1.1.2009 EUR |
Zug EUR |
Zu- schreibungen EUR |
Abg EUR |
Stand am 31.12.2009 EUR |
Stand am 31.12.2009 EUR |
Stand am 31.12.2008 EUR |
|
| II. Sachanlagen: |
886.939,40 | 80.645,85 | 346.960,66 | 620.624,59 | 532.976,18 | 219.172,78 | 0,00 | 346.887,59 | 405.261,37 | 215.363,22 | 353.963,22 | |
| Rechte | ||||||||||||
| ‰ftsausstattung | 1.184.728,61 | 101.202,44 | 85.367,88 | 1.200.563,17 | 539.097,89 | 181.700,31 | 0,00 | 55.954,86 | 664.843,34 | 535.719,83 | 645.630,72 | |
| Andere Anlagen, Betriebs- III. Finanzanlagen: und Gesch |
||||||||||||
| 1. Anteile an verbundenen Unternehmen |
224.644.841,41 | 6.135.000,00 | 123.349.537,05 | 107.430.304,36 | 112.977.607,48 | 962.271,82 | 4.090.092,52 | 48.749.537,05 | 61.100.249,73 | 46.330.054,63 | 111.667.233,93 | |
| 2. Beteiligungen ˆgens |
30.979,06 | 0,00 | 0,00 | 30.979,06 | 0,00 | 0,00 | 0,00 | 0,00 | 0,00 | 30.979,06 | 30.979,06 | |
| 3. Wertpapiere des Anlageverm |
81.719.082,81 | 0,00 | 81.719.082,81 | 0,00 | 0,00 | 0,00 | 0,00 | 0,00 | 0,00 | 0,00 | 81.719.082,81 | |
| 4. Sonstige Ausleihungen |
308.878.229,28 2.483.326,00 310.949.897,29 |
6.135.000,00 0,00 6.316.848,29 |
205.551.945,86 483.326,00 205.984.274,40 |
109.461.283,42 2.000.000,00 111.282.471,18 |
112.977.607,48 0,00 114.049.681,55 |
962.271,82 0,00 1.363.144,91 |
4.090.092,52 0,00 4.090.092,52 |
48.749.537,05 0,00 49.152.379,50 |
61.100.249,73 0,00 62.170.354,44 |
48.361.033,69 2.000.000,00 49.112.116,74 |
195.900.621,80 2.483.326,00 196.900.215,74 |
|
Die Gesellschaft h‰lt bei folgenden Unternehmen mindestens 20,0 % Anteilsbesitz:
| ‰h- | ‰fts- | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kapital- | Eigenkapital/ | Ergebnis des |
|||
| anteil | W | Negatives | Gesch | ||
| Beteiligungsunternehmen ˆrsching |
% | rung | Eigenkapital | jahres | Stichtag |
| POLYTEC FOR Car Styling |
EUR | 1.700.000,00 | 2.001.278,38 | 31.12.2009 | |
| GmbH & Co KG, H ˆrsching |
100,0 | EUR | 1.700.000,00 | 5.562.740,03 | 31.12.2008 |
| POLYTEC FOR Car Styling |
EUR | 50.029,67 | 9.471,99 | 31.12.2009 | |
| GmbH, H |
100,0 | EUR | 40.557,68 | 5.466,52 | 31.12.2008 |
| POLYTEC FOHA INC., |
USD | 743.501,47 | 122.401,07 | 31.12.2009 | |
| Warren, USA |
80,0 | USD | 621.100,40 | 125.871,97 | 31.12.2008 |
| POLYTEC FOHA CORP., |
CAD | -134.406,00 | -4.481,00 | 31.12.2009 | |
| Markham, Kanada flbritannien |
80,0 | CAD | -129.925,00 | 6.519,00 | 31.12.2008 |
| Polytec Holden Ltd., |
GBP | 1.609.074,00 | 146.557,00 | 31.12.2009 | |
| Bromyard, Gro |
100,0 | GBP | 1.462.518,00 | 1.609.053,00 | 31.12.2008 |
| POLYTEC-AVO N.V., |
EUR | 875.899,71 | 146.223,28 | 31.12.2009 | |
| Schoten, Belgien |
100,0 | EUR | 879.676,43 | 315.465,62 | 31.12.2008 |
| Ratipur Kraftfahrzeugbauteile ‰nkter Haftung, und Autoausstattung Herstel Û, Ungarn lungs- und Vertriebsgesellschaft |
|||||
| mit beschr |
THUF | 611.881 | 84.121 | 31.12.2008 | |
| Koml | 24,0 | THUF | 577.760 | 99.168 | 31.12.2007 |
| POLYTEC Holding Deutschland GmbH, Geretsried, Deutschland |
100,0 | EUR EUR |
19.236.234,76 18.677.935,17 |
558.299,59 -37.102.471,17 |
31.12.2009 31.12.2008 |
| POLYTEC Interior Zaragoza |
EUR | -3.043.596,53 | -5.274.140,86 | 31.12.2009 | |
| S.L., Zaragoza, Spanien |
100,0 | EUR | 2.230.544,00 | -1.039.942,00 | 31.12.2008 |
| POLYTEC Interior Polska Sp.z.o.o., Tomaszow |
PLN | 8.538.397,38 | -9.483.909,31 | 31.12.2009 | |
| Mazowiecki, Polen |
100,0 | PLN | 18.022.306,69 | -21.787.389,49 | 31.12.2008 |
| Polytec Composites Italia S.r.l., |
EUR | 2.887.651,86 | -2.137.024,98 | 31.12.2009 | |
| Mondovi, Italien |
99,9 | EUR | 6.024.676,00 | 2.242.718,00 | 31.12.2008 |
| Polytec Composites Sweden |
SEK | -10.429.687,62 | -25.901.128,54 | 31.12.2009 | |
| AB, Ljungby, Schweden ˆrsching |
100,0 | SEK | 10.106.442,00 | -35.119.822,00 | 31.12.2008 |
| PT Beteiligungs GmbH, |
EUR | 2.997.379,49 | 45.863,63 | 31.12.2009 | |
| H | 100,0 | EUR | 3.151.515,86 | -74.367,57 | 31.12.2008 |
| POLYTEC Invest GmbH, |
EUR | 6.535.107,00 | -834.804,00 | 31.12.2009 | |
| Geretsried, Deutschland ˆrsching |
100,0 | EUR | 7.369.911,14 | -8.255.088,86 | 31.12.2008 |
| POLYTEC Automotive |
EUR | 33.583,76 | -907,06 | 31.12.2009 | |
| Systems GmbH, H |
100,0 | EUR | 34.490,82 | -509,18 | 31.12.2008 |
Rechnungslegungsstandards aufgestellte Jahresabschluss der POLYTEC Holding AG ein mˆglichst getreues Bild der Vermˆgens-, Finanz- und Ertragslage des Unternehmens vermittelt, dass der Lagebericht den Gesch‰ftsverlauf, das Gesch‰ftsergebnis und die Lage des Unternehmens so darstellt, dass ein mˆglichst getreues Bild der Vermˆgens-, Finanz- und Ertragslage entsteht, und dass der Lagebericht die wesentlichen Risiken und Ungewissheiten beschreibt, denen das Unternehmen ausgesetzt ist. Hˆrsching, am 6. April 2010
Vorstand
Vorstandsvorsitzender Mitglied des Vorstandes
Ing. Friedrich Huemer e.h. Mag. Eduard Schreiner e.h.
Mitglied des Vorstandes Mitglied des Vorstandes
Ing. Alfred Kollros e.h. Ing. Andreas Jagl e.h.
Wir haben den beigef¸gten Jahresabschluss der POLYTEC Holding AG,Hˆrsching, f¸r das Gesch‰ftsjahr vom 1. J‰nner 2009 bis zum 31. Dezember 2009 unter Einbeziehung der Buchf¸hrung gepr¸ft. Dieser Jahresabschluss umfasst die Bilanz zum 31. Dezember 2009, die Gewinn- und Verlustrechnung f¸r das am 31. Dezember 2009 endende Gesch‰ftsjahr sowie den Anhang. Verantwortung der gesetzlichen Vertreter f¸r den Jahresabschluss und f¸r die Buchf¸hrung
Aufstellung und den Inhalt des Jahresabschlusses verantwortlich, der ein mˆglichst getreues Bild der Vermˆgens-, Finanz- und Ertragslage der Gesellschaft in ‹bereinstimmung mit den ˆsterreichischen unternehmensrechtlichen Vorschriften vermittelt. Diese Verantwortung beinhaltet: Gestaltung, Umsetzung und Aufrechterhaltung eines internen Kontrollsystems, soweit dieses f¸r die Aufstellung des Jahresabschlusses und die Vermittlung eines mˆglichst getreuen Bildes der Vermˆgens-, Finanz- und Ertragslage der Gesellschaft von Bedeutung ist, damit dieser frei von wesentlichen Fehldarstellungen ist, sei es auf Grund von beabsichtigten oder unbeabsichtigten Fehlern; die Auswahl und Anwendung geeigneter Bilanzierungs- und Bewertungsmethoden; die Vornahme von Sch‰tzungen, die unter Ber¸cksichtigung der gegebenen Rahmenbedingungen angemessen erscheinen. Verantwortung des Abschlusspr¸fers und Beschreibung von Art und Umfang der
Jahresabschluss auf der Grundlage unserer Pr¸fung. Wir haben unsere Pr¸fung unter Beachtung der in ÷sterreich geltenden gesetzlichen Vorschriften und Grunds‰tze ordnungsgem‰fler Abschlusspr¸fung durchgef¸hrt. Diese Grunds‰tze erfordern, dass wir die Standesregeln einhalten und die Pr¸fung so planen und durchf¸hren, dass wir uns mit hinreichender Sicherheit ein Urteil dar¸ber bilden kˆnnen, ob der Jahresabschluss frei von wesentlichen Fehldarstellungen ist. Eine Pr¸fung beinhaltet die Durchf¸hrung von Pr¸fungshandlungen zur Erlangung
von Pr¸fungsnachweisen hinsichtlich der Betr‰ge und sonstigen Angaben im Jahresabschluss. Die Auswahl der Pr¸fungshandlungen liegt im pflichtgem‰flen Ermessen des Abschlusspr¸fers unter Ber¸cksichtigung seiner Einsch‰tzung des Risikos eines Auftretens wesentlicher Fehldarstellungen, sei es auf Grund von beabsichtigten oder unbeabsichtigten Fehlern. Bei der Vornahme dieser Risikoeinsch‰tzung ber¸cksichtigt der Abschlusspr¸fer das interne Kontrollsystem, soweit es f¸r die Aufstellung des Jahresabschlusses und die Vermittlung eines mˆglichst getreuen Bildes der Vermˆgens-, Finanz- und Ertragslage der Gesellschaft von Bedeutung ist, um unter Ber¸cksichtigung der Rahmenbedingungen geeignete Pr¸fungshandlungen festzulegen, nicht jedoch um ein Pr¸fungsurteil ¸ber die Wirksamkeit der internen Kontrollen der Gesellschaft abzugeben. Die Pr¸fung umfasst ferner die Beurteilung der Angemessenheit der angewandten Bilanzierungsund Bewertungsmethoden und der von den gesetzlichen Vertretern vorgenommenen wesentlichen Sch‰tzungen sowie eine W¸rdigung der Gesamtaussage des Jahresabschlusses. Wir sind der Auffassung, dass wir ausreichende und geeignete Pr¸fungsnachweise
erlangt haben, sodass unsere Pr¸fung eine hinreichend sichere Grundlage f¸r unser Pr¸fungsurteil darstellt. Pr¸fungsurteil
Unsere Pr¸fung hat zu keinen Einwendungen gef¸hrt. Auf Grund der bei der Pr¸fung gewonnenen Erkenntnisse entspricht der Jahresabschluss nach unserer Beurteilung den gesetzlichen Vorschriften und vermittelt ein mˆglichst getreues Bild der Vermˆgens- und Finanzlage der POLYTEC Holding AG zum 31. Dezember 2009 sowie der Ertragslage der Gesellschaft f¸r das Gesch‰ftsjahr vom 1. J‰nner 2009 bis zum 31. Dezember 2009 in ‹bereinstimmung mit den ˆsterreichischen Grunds‰tzen ordnungsm‰fliger Buchf¸hrung. Ohne den Best‰tigungsvermerk einzuschr‰nken, weisen wir darauf hin, dass die
k¸nftige Entwicklung sowie der positive Fortbestand der Gesellschaft bzw. des Konzerns der POLYTEC Holding AG ungewiss und insbesondere von der Sicherstellung der weiteren Finanzierung und dem Eintritt der vom Vorstand nach bestem aktuellen Wissen eingesch‰tzten zuk¸nftigen Gesch‰ftsentwicklung abh‰ngig sind. Aufgrund der derzeitigen wirtschaftlichen Situation und der schwer einsch‰tzbaren
Entwicklung im Automobil- und Nutzfahrzeugbereich weisen wir ñ wie auch der Vorstand im Anhang und Lagebericht ñ darauf hin, dass Ver‰nderungen in der k¸nftigen Ertragslage und im k¸nftigen Finanzierungsbedarf eintreten kˆnnen, die aus heutiger Sicht nicht abschlieflend eingesch‰tzt werden kˆnnen. Es ist auch nicht auszuschlieflen, dass Konzerngesellschaften der POLYTEC Holding AG in ihrem Fortbestand gef‰hrdet sind. Daher sind nachteilige k¸nftige Wertminderungen der bilanzierten Vermˆgensgegenst‰nde - insbesondere der Anteile an verbundenen Unternehmen sowie der Forderungen gegen¸ber verbundenen Unternehmen - bzw. Inanspruchnahmen aus Haftungen mˆglich. Die Planungsrechnungen und die daraus resultierenden Liquidit‰tsplanungenenthalten unverhandelte Maflnahmen (z.B. Umsatzzuw‰chse und Personalkostenreduktionen). Der tats‰chliche Ausgang dieser Verhandlungen kann einen wesentlichen Einfluss auf die k¸nftige Ertragslage und den Finanzbedarf der Gesellschaft und des Konzerns haben. Die finanzierende Hausbank hat als Hauptgl‰ubiger mit Schreiben vom 9. M‰rz 2010
best‰tigt, dass sie beabsichtigt, bei einer den Planungsrechnungen vom 27. November 2009 entsprechenden Entwicklung des Konzerns der POLYTEC Holding AG die Finanzierungszusagen weiterhin aufrecht zu erhalten, vorbehaltlich Gremialzustimmung auch bis 31. Dezember 2011. Negative Planabweichungen einzelner Gesellschaften und/oder Standorte des Konzerns der POLYTEC Holding AG werden von der finanzierenden Hausbank nicht als alleinige Begr¸ndung f¸r eine K¸ndigung von Finanzierungszusagen herangezogen werden, sofern die Entwicklung des gesamten Konzerns der POLYTEC Holding AG weiterhin nicht signifikant von den Planungsrechnungen vom 27. November 2009 abweicht.
Zu diesen hinweisenden Erg‰nzungen verweisen wirauch auf die Darstellungen zur Finanzierung und Fortf¸hrung der Gesellschaft und des Konzerns im Anhang (Abschnitt V.) und Lagebericht (Abschnitt 2.). Aussagenzum Lagebericht
Der Lagebericht ist auf Grund der gesetzlichen Vorschriften darauf zu pr¸fen, ob er mit dem Jahresabschluss in Einklang steht und ob die sonstigen Angaben im Lagebericht nicht eine falsche Vorstellung von der Lage der Gesellschaft erwecken. Der Best‰tigungsvermerk hat auch eine Aussage dar¸ber zu enthalten, ob der Lagebericht mit dem Jahresabschluss in Einklang steht und ob die Angaben nach ß 243a UGB zutreffen. Der Lagebericht steht nach unserer Beurteilung in Einklang mit dem Jahresabschluss. Die Angaben gem‰fl ß 243a UGB sind zutreffend.
Leonding, am 6. April 2010 Deloitte
Mag. Nikolaus Schaffer ppa e.h. Wirtschaftspr¸fer
Mag. Ulrich Dollinger e h Wirtschaftspr¸fer eh
Building tools?
Free accounts include 100 API calls/year for testing.
Have a question? We'll get back to you promptly.