Annual Report • May 28, 2013
Annual Report
Open in ViewerOpens in native device viewer
LEG Immobilien AG
| HI GH LIG HT S |
|||
|---|---|---|---|
| 01 .01 .-3 1.0 3.2 01 3 |
01 .01 .-3 1.0 3.2 01 2 |
Ch an ge |
|
| of Re lt tio su o pe ra ns |
|||
| al Re inc nt om e |
89 .2 M io. € |
85 .6 M io. € |
4.3 % |
| Ne l a nd le e i t r ta en as nc om e |
59 .5 M io. € |
58 .3 M io. € |
2.1 % |
| EB IT DA |
50 M io. € .5 |
52 .6 M io. € |
-4 .0 % |
| ad d EB IT DA ju ste |
54 .2 M io. € |
56 .0 M io. € |
-3 .1 % |
| EB T |
11 .9 M io. € |
15 .9 M io. € |
-2 5.0 % |
| Co oli da d n of it te et ns pr |
M io. 11 .3 € |
M io. 17 .1 € |
-3 4.1 % |
| FF O I |
33 .8 M io. € |
35 .5 M io. € |
-4 .8 % |
| FF O II |
33 .6 M io. € |
34 .9 M io. € |
-3 .7 % |
| AF FO |
26 .8 M io. € |
26 .2 M io. € |
2.3 % |
| Po fo lio rt |
|||
| sid l u Re tia nit en s |
90 ,92 1 |
89 ,8 00 |
1.2 % |
| pla In- nt ce -re |
/q 4. 91 € m |
/q 4. 81 € m |
2.1 % |
| Va ate ca nc y r |
3.2 % |
4.1 % |
- |
| 31 .0 3.2 01 3 |
31 .12 .20 12 |
Ch an ge |
|
| St f f in cia l p iti at t o em en an os on |
|||
| Inv tm t p rty es en ro pe |
4, 94 3.2 M io. € |
4,9 37 .1 M io. € |
0.1 % |
| sh d c h e len Ca iva ts an as qu |
12 0.2 M io. € |
13 3.7 M io. € |
-10 .1 % |
| Eq uit y |
2,1 47 .3 M io. € |
2,0 85 .5 M io. € |
3.0 % |
| To l fi ial lia bil itie ta na nc s |
2, 48 8.1 M io. € |
2,4 99 M io. .7 € |
-0 .5 % |
| fi ial lia bil Cu itie nt rre na nc s |
18 5.7 M io. € |
39 6.8 M io. € |
-5 3.2 % |
| LT V |
47 .86 % |
47 .90 % |
- |
| Eq uit io at y r |
40 .9 % |
39 .8 % |
- |
| EP RA N AV |
2, 42 2.7 M io. € |
2,3 68 .3 M io. € |
2.3 % |
| sh EP RA N AV p er are |
45 .74 € |
44 .72 € |
2.3 % |
| LE TT ER F RO M T H E M A N A G EM EN T BO A RD |
4 |
|---|---|
| O S O S L ET T E R T T H E H A R E H L D E R |
|
| LE G -S H A RE S PO RT FO LI O |
6 8 |
| IN T E R IM M A N A G E M E N T R E P O R T |
|
| A A LY SI S O A SS S, A C IA PO SI IO A ES S O O RA IO N F N ET ET F IN N L T N N D R U LT F PE T N SU PP LE M EN TA RY R EP O RT RE PO RT O F RI SK S A N D O PP O RT U N IT IE S FO RE CA ST |
14 21 22 22 |
| C O N S O L ID A T E D I N T E R IM F IN A N C IA L ST A T E M E N T S |
|
| CO N SO LI DA ED S TA EN O FI N A N C IA L PO SI IO N A RC H T T EM T F T 31 ST M 20 13 – CO N SO DA S TA EN O CO EN SI V IN CO A RC LI T ED T EM T F M PR EH E M E 31 ST M H 20 13 – CO N SO LI DA T ED S TA T EM EN T O F CA SH F LO W S 31 ST M A RC H 20 13 – SE LE CT ED N O T ES ST AT EM EN T O F C H A N G ES IN C O N SO LI DA T ED E Q U IT Y 31 M A RC H 20 13 ST – |
25 26 27 28 40 |
| FI N A N C IA L CA LE N DA R |
4 3 |
The first three months of this year were very exciting for us. Since 1st February 2013, LEG Immobilien AG has been listed on the Frankfurt Stock Exchange. LEG's IPO was the first German IPO in 2013 and the largest western European real estate IPO to date. Thus, LEG has taken another step towards the future, and its shift towards a focused growth strategy. In regards to operations, we have had a good first quarter.
Organic rental growth from the successful management of our holdings, a key value driver, is showing an accelerating positive trend. In comparison to Q1 2012, rental income has increased by 4.3 per cent overall. Growth not including the effect of the acquisition of the Bocholt port folio stands at 3.0 per cent. Our letting successes can also be seen in a significant reduction in vacancies from 4.1 per cent in the previous year to 3.2 per cent. In-place rents per square metre have ultimately risen by 2.1 per cent to €4.91 in comparison to Q1 2012. In connection with the announced new rent indexes, we are also fore casting further acceleration in rent growth over the course of the year.
FFO I (funds from operations not including sales or sales income) declined by 4.8 per cent to €33.8million in the first quarter (Q1 2012: €35.5 million). This decline is solely due to the temporary effect of higher maintenance ex penses, which rose by €5.1 million compared to the same period in the previous year. This ex pense-ratio is expected to fall again as the year progresses, thereby supporting the expected positive earnings performance.
EPRA net asset value amounted to €2,422.7 million or €45.74 per share as of 31st March 2013, an increase of 2.3 per cent in comparison to 31st December 2012 (€2,368.3 million). At the same time, the equity ratio of 40.9 per cent and the low loan-to-value (LTV) ratio of 47.86 per cent allow us to ensure our defensive and simultaneously growth-oriented business model.
After the 1,244 rental units acquired in Bocholt in Q4 2012 were successfully integrated in the first quarter, operating performance indicators here are already exceeding our expectations. The purchase has therefore successfully boosted both NAV as well as FFO and substantiated our valueadd growth strategy.
We have also come closer to our goal of acquir ing around 10,000 rental units by the end of 2014. The acquisition of a portfolio of approx. 2,200 units concentrated in the Ruhr area was notarised on 15th May 2013. This portfolio has strong synergies with our existing platform and meets LEG's demanding acquisition requirements. The initial FFO yield for the acquired port folio is above our target yield for acquisitions and we believe there is further upside potential by leveraging our local expertise to significantly reduce vacancy from the current rate of approx. 8 per cent. Closing for the transaction is expected for 1st August 2013. Our financial strength and flexibility helped us to become the seller's exclusive negotiating partner at an early stage.
In order to keep pushing ahead with acquisitions, LEG's internal acquisition team was recently strengthened with additional experienced new hires.
On this basis, LEG can confirm its outlook for the fiscal year 2013 with a forecast of operating earnings (FFO I) of €137 to €140 million. This forecast does not include the effects of the acquisitions signed year to date or still to be implemented in 2013.
We would like to expressly thank our shareholders, tenants and business partners for having faith in us and our recently listed company. We will remain on our strategic course.
Dusseldorf, May 2013
Eckhard Schultz (CFO)
Holger Hentschel (COO)
Thomas Hegel (CEO)
| L EG -S H A R ES |
|---|
| P O RT FO L IO |
6 8
In the first quarter 2013, the German stock mar ket saw a good overall beginning. The German blue chip index, the DAX, climbed from 7,612.39 to 7,795.31 at the end of the quarter, an increase of 2.4 per cent. The DAX reached its highest standing in Q1 14th March at 8,058.37 points.
A positive performance from US indicators incited hopes for the recovery of the global economy. However, bad news from the Euro zone, such as the political instability in Italy and the threat of bankruptcy in Cyprus, repeatedly slowed developments on the stock markets.
In a positive overall market environment, LEG's IPO met with a very high level of interest from renowned national and international investors.
LEG's shares debuted on the stock market 1st February 2013 and the offering was multiple times oversubscribed. The issue price was €44 per share.
Shortly after going public, LEG's shares were added to the key FTSE EPRA/NAREIT and GPR indexes.
On 31st March, LEG shares closed the quarter at €41.80. In the period from 1st February to 31st March, LEG's shares underperformed the DAX, which tended somewhat weaker at -0.5 per cent, though LEG's share price performance was very consistent with that of the sector in general. Over this brief period, the EPRA Germany Index, the benchmark index for German real estate shares, was below the overall market performance at -4.4 per cent.
The free float as defined by Deutsche Börse is 50 per cent plus one share.
| SH AR |
FO E P ER RM |
AN CE |
IN CA DI |
TO RS |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ck bo l Ti er sy m |
LE G |
|---|---|
| Nu be f s ha m r o res |
63 52 ,9 ,44 4 |
| Ini tia l li sti ng |
1s t F eb 2 01 3 ru ary |
| ke M t s t ar eg m en |
nd ard Pr im e S ta |
| Ind ex es |
A/ FT SE E PR NA RE IT, Ind GP R ex es |
| fer da (3 3) Re 1.0 3.2 01 te en ce |
41 .80 € |
| ke ita lisa tio n ( M 31 .03 .20 13 t c ar ap |
) io. 2, 21 3.9 M € |
| Fre e F loa t |
50 % lus sh p o ne are |
| le- da Av ing er ag e s y din olu tra g v m e |
41 5,9 44 sh are s |
| gh Hi |
44 .50 € |
| Lo w |
40 .82 € |
Currently, the share is being actively covered by nine analysts. Positive investment recommendations are clearly in the majority. There are seven recommendations with a positive vote, two with a neutral opinion and none with a sale recommendation. Analysts' upside targets are between €44.10 and €51.50, all considerably above the closing price as of the end of the quarter.
PORTFOLIO SEGMENTATION TOP-THREE-LOCATIONS
| by be f a cl rtm t p te n um r o pa en er us r |
31 .0 3.1 3 |
|||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| f Nu be m r o LE G tm ts ap ar en |
f Sh ar e o LE G rtf ol io in % po |
Li vin g s pa ce in sq m |
In lac nt -p e- re €/ sq m |
Va at ca nc y r e in % |
||
| Hi gh th ke ts g ro w m ar |
31 ,4 88 |
.6 34 |
2, 07 9, 51 1 |
46 5. |
1. 5 |
|
| Di ict f M str et tm o an n |
8, 09 7 |
8. 9 |
56 1,3 24 |
5. 48 |
2. 0 |
|
| M ste un r |
6, 10 6 |
6. 7 |
40 30 3 5, |
5. 77 |
0. 4 |
|
| log Co ne |
3, 51 1 |
3. 9 |
23 7,4 72 |
5. 69 |
0. 7 |
|
| Ot he r l io at oc ns |
13 ,7 74 |
15 .1 |
87 5,4 12 |
5. 23 |
1. 9 |
|
| St ab le ke ith tiv yi el ds ts tt e m ar w a ra |
32 ,0 39 |
35 .2 |
06 2, 5, 58 8 |
62 4. |
4. 0 |
|
| Do d rtm un |
11 53 ,5 |
12 .7 |
76 6, 25 2 |
4. 55 |
3. 0 |
|
| Ha m m |
3, 97 6 |
4. 4 |
23 9, 99 5 |
4. 41 |
3. 2 |
|
| lef eld Bie |
2, 32 8 |
2. 6 |
14 2, 35 2 |
5. 20 |
3.1 | |
| Ot he r l io at oc ns |
14 ,18 2 |
.6 15 |
6, 91 98 9 |
65 4. |
5. 3 |
|
| Hi gh ie ld in ke ts er y g m ar |
26 ,0 05 |
28 .6 |
1, 60 8, 06 4 |
4. 54 |
4. 5 |
|
| f R kli ha Di ict str o ec ng us en |
6, 40 7 |
7. 0 |
40 1,1 83 |
4. 55 |
6. 0 |
|
| isb Du ur g |
4, 72 8 |
5. 2 |
28 9, 91 0 |
4. 67 |
4. 2 |
|
| rk h M isc Di ict str ae |
4, 41 2 |
4. 9 |
26 9, 73 0 |
46 4. |
3. 2 |
|
| Ot he r l io at oc ns |
10 58 ,4 |
11 .5 |
64 7,2 40 |
51 4. |
3 4. |
|
| O si de N RW ut |
1, 38 9 |
1. 5 |
92 ,0 84 |
4. 94 |
0. 5 |
|
| l To ta |
90 ,9 21 |
10 0. 0 |
5. 84 5, 24 6 |
4. 91 |
3. 2 |
As of 31st December 2012, LEG Immobilien AG's portfolio comprised 90,921 residential units, 996 commercial units and 21,579 garages and parking spaces. The assets are distributed across approx. 160 locations in North Rhine-Westphalia. On average, the residential units measure 64 square metres and have three rooms. Build ings comprise an average of 6.5 residential units and three stories.
LEG's portfolio has been classified into three market clusters based on a scoring system derived from CBRE market data: orange (growth markets), green (stable markets) and purple (higher yielding markets). All 54 municipalities and districts in North Rhine-Westphalia were analysed. Except for the city of Leverkusen and Olpe, Kleve and Viersen districts, LEG maintains a presence in all regions with a focus on the urban markets.
Growth markets (orange) are characterised by a positive population trend, positive house hold projections and consistently high demand for residential units. Stable markets (green) are more heterogeneous than growth markets in terms of their demographic and socio-economic development; their housing industry appeal is, on average, solid to high. Higher yielding markets (purple) are subject to a higher risk of population decline due to ageing and migration. How ever, with a strong local presence and good market access, there is still potential for these submarkets and opportunities for attractive risk-adjusted returns.
The underlying indicators in the scoring system are regularly reviewed and are based on demographic, socio-economic and property market data, such as population trends, household fore casts, purchasing power, rent levels and rent multipliers.
Our analysis of the various local markets in NRW was unchanged in comparison to Q4 2012. Out of a maximum of 48 possible points (8 points per indicator), the Bonn submarket performed
| Ch an ge |
31 .0 3.1 2 |
|||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Va at ca nc y r e in b is int as po s |
lac In nt -p e- re in % |
Va at ca nc y r e in % |
lac In nt -p e- re €/ sq m |
Li vin g s pa ce in sq m |
Sh f ar e o LE G rtf ol io in % po |
be f N um r o LE G tm ts ap ar en |
| -5 0 |
3. 1 |
2. 0 |
5. 29 |
2, 01 3, 51 1 |
33 .8 |
30 ,3 09 |
| -8 0 |
4. 7 |
2. 8 |
5. 24 |
56 1,7 59 |
9. 0 |
8, 10 2 |
| -2 0 |
2. 3 |
0. 6 |
64 5. |
40 6, 35 9 |
6. 8 |
6, 11 6 |
| -1 30 |
4. 9 |
2. 0 |
5. 42 |
23 7,9 73 |
3. 9 |
3, 52 0 |
| -2 0 |
2. 2 |
2.1 | 5. 12 |
80 7,4 21 |
14 .0 |
12 ,5 71 |
| -1 10 |
0. 9 |
5. 1 |
4. 58 |
06 6, 2, 82 5 |
35 .7 |
32 ,0 57 |
| -1 10 |
0. 0 |
4.1 | 4. 55 |
76 6, 65 5 |
12 .9 |
11 60 ,5 |
| -1 0 |
1. 9 |
3. 3 |
4. 33 |
23 9, 99 5 |
4. 4 |
3, 97 6 |
| 10 | 0. 9 |
3. 0 |
5. 15 |
14 2, 35 5 |
2. 6 |
2, 32 9 |
| -1 50 |
1. 5 |
6. 8 |
4. 59 |
91 7,8 19 |
15 .8 |
14 ,19 2 |
| -9 0 |
1. 2 |
4 5. |
4. 48 |
1, 60 9, 92 4 |
29 .0 |
26 ,0 45 |
| -1 20 |
1.1 | 7. 2 |
4. 50 |
40 2, 27 0 |
7. 2 |
6, 42 5 |
| -8 0 |
2. 8 |
5. 0 |
4. 54 |
29 0, 65 2 |
5. 3 |
4, 74 0 |
| -2 0 |
6 0. |
3. 4 |
4. 43 |
26 9, 72 8 |
4. 9 |
4, 41 2 |
| -1 00 |
0. 8 |
4 5. |
4. 47 |
64 7,2 73 |
11 .7 |
10 ,4 68 |
| 0 | 2. 5 |
0. 5 |
4. 82 |
92 ,0 84 |
1. 5 |
1, 38 9 |
| -9 0 |
2. 0 |
4. 1 |
4. 81 |
5, 78 2, 34 4 |
10 0. 0 |
89 ,8 00 |
best at 40 points. Rankings 2 and 3 went to Munster and Rhein-Sieg District, respectively, followed by Cologne and Dusseldorf. A further 15 growth markets are distributed across the Rhineland area, parts of Munsterland and the District of Paderborn. The list of the municipalities and districts classified as stable markets is headed by the District of Aachen, Oberbergisch District and Bielefeld; there are 20 further submarkets spread across the entire territory of NRW. Having 18 points, the District of Unna heads the higher yielding market segment, followed by ten further submarkets predominantly in the Ruhr area and Sauerland.
The residential portfolio was virtually unchanged compared to 31st December 2012 (90,926 residential units) in the first quarter of 2013.
Rent development was highly positive across all submarkets compared to the first quarter of 2012. The average in-place rent climbed from €4.81 per square metre to €4.90 per square metre on a same-store basis and from €4.81 per square metre to €4.91 per square metre absolute. In the free financed portfolio, rents increased 3.2 per cent to €5.19 per square metre on a same-store basis and 3.4 per cent to €5.20 per square metre absolute.
| DE VE LO PM EN T O F T HE L EG -P O RT FO LIO |
|||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Re sid tia l u nit en s |
31 .0 3.1 3 |
31 .12 .12 |
31 .0 3.1 2 |
31 .0 3.1 3 |
31 .12 .12 |
31 .0 3.1 2 |
|
| Hi | gh th ke gr ow m ar |
ts | St ab le m ar |
ke ith ts at tra w |
eld ive yi ct s |
||
| Re ol le d nt tr tm ts -c on ap ar en |
|||||||
| Nu be m r |
11 01 ,5 |
11 58 ,5 |
11 ,4 84 |
14 ,54 6 |
15 ,4 88 |
15 ,4 93 |
|
| (i ) Ar ea n s qm |
79 6,8 01 |
80 0,3 55 |
79 4,9 39 |
99 4,5 99 |
1, 05 0,2 29 |
1, 05 0,5 30 |
|
| pla (in €/ m) In- nt ce -re sq |
4. 89 |
4. 87 |
4. 84 |
4. 35 |
4. 34 |
4. 39 |
|
| Va (i ) n % ate ca nc y r |
1.5 | 1.5 | 1.9 | 4. 2 |
8 3. |
5.1 | |
| fin Pr iv el d at tm ts y an ce ap ar en |
|||||||
| be Nu m r |
19 ,9 87 |
19 ,9 07 |
18 ,82 5 |
17 ,4 93 |
16 ,5 60 |
16 ,5 64 |
|
| Ar (i ) ea n s qm |
76 6 1,2 ,97 |
76 6 1,2 ,97 |
1,2 17 ,8 58 |
5,6 1, 01 39 |
5,6 1, 01 39 |
1, 01 5,9 73 |
|
| (in m) In- pla €/ nt ce -re sq |
82 5. |
69 5. |
59 5. |
4. 88 |
4. 83 |
4. 76 |
|
| (i ) Va n % ate ca nc y r |
1.5 | 1.4 | 2. 0 |
3. 9 |
3. 8 |
5.1 | |
| l a To ta rt ts pa m en |
|||||||
| Nu be m r |
31 88 ,4 |
31 65 ,4 |
30 ,3 09 |
32 ,0 39 |
32 ,04 8 |
32 ,0 57 |
|
| (i ) Ar ea n s qm |
2, 07 9,5 11 |
2, 07 7,3 30 |
2, 01 2,7 97 |
2, 06 5,5 88 |
2, 06 5,8 68 |
2, 06 6,5 03 |
|
| pla (in €/ m) In- nt ce -re sq |
5. 46 |
5. 38 |
5. 29 |
4. 62 |
4. 59 |
4. 58 |
|
| Va (i ) n % ate ca nc y r |
1.5 | 1.4 | 2. 0 |
4. 0 |
3. 8 |
5.1 | |
| To l c cia l ta om m er |
|||||||
| be Nu m r |
|||||||
| Ar (i ) ea n s qm |
|||||||
| To l p ki ta ar ng |
|||||||
In our growth markets, rents per square metre rose significantly by 3.1 per cent. Growth in our stable markets was 0.9 per cent, though this is mainly due to a negative non-recurring effect in the fourth quarter of 2012. Due to the favourable refinancing of loans in connection with subsidised properties, benefits also had to be passed on to tenants in the form of rent reductions. These rent reductions did not affect FFO on account of the reduction in interest expenses by the same amount. However, rents rose by around 0.6 per cent quarter-on-quarter, indicating a significant acceleration in annualised rent development. Rents also increased in higher yielding markets by 1.2 per cent, suggesting here as well faster growth than in the previous year.
Occupancy improved substantially year over year from 95.9 per cent in Q1 2012 to 96.8 per cent in Q1 2013. All portfolio segments benefited from this positive development. The development on the stable markets and the higher yielding markets was especially gratifying, where vacan cies were down by 110 and 90 basis points, respectively. In addition to the positive fundamental trend in supply and demand conditions in our markets, this encouraging development is due to the further optimisation of letting processes in the context of central letting management. A further improvement in operating efficiency is also reflected by the fact that the number of new leases (2,275) is 12.4 per cent higher than the average for the last three years. The number of vacant rental units as of 31st March 2013 was 2,905.
An important indicator for tenant satisfaction is the fluctuation rate. In comparison to the same period of the previous year, the fluctuation rate in the first three months declined to 10.4 per cent (Q1 2012: 10.9 per cent).
| 31 .0 3.1 2 |
31 .12 .12 |
31 .0 3.1 3 |
31 .0 3.1 2 |
* 31 .12 .12 |
31 .0 3.1 3 |
31 .0 3.1 2 |
31 .12 .12 |
31 .0 3.1 3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| l To ta |
N -N RW on |
ts | eld ke yi ing er m ar |
gh Hi |
||||
| 36 ,5 35 |
36 ,5 83 |
35 ,3 92 |
22 0 |
22 0 |
22 0 |
9, 33 8 |
9, 31 7 |
9,1 25 |
| 2, 47 9, 92 0 |
2, 48 3, 45 9 |
2, 41 2, 75 7 |
17 ,19 2 |
17 ,19 2 |
17 ,19 2 |
61 7,2 58 |
61 5,6 83 |
60 4,1 65 |
| 4. 50 |
4. 48 |
4. 50 |
4.1 7 |
4. 20 |
4.1 9 |
4. 21 |
4. 20 |
4. 22 |
| 4. 3 |
3. 4 |
3. 5 |
0. 5 |
1.4 | 0. 0 |
6. 0 |
5. 2 |
4. 9 |
| 53 ,2 65 |
54 ,3 43 |
29 55 ,5 |
1,1 69 |
1,1 69 |
1,1 69 |
16 ,7 07 |
16 ,7 07 |
16 ,8 80 |
| 3, 30 1,3 87 |
3, 36 0, 90 8 |
3, 36 0, 90 8 |
74 ,8 92 |
74 ,8 92 |
74 ,8 92 |
99 2,6 65 |
99 3,4 02 |
99 3,4 02 |
| 5. 07 |
5. 13 |
5. 20 |
4. 97 |
5. 07 |
5.1 1 |
65 4. |
4. 70 |
4. 73 |
| 3. 9 |
3. 0 |
3.1 | 0. 5 |
0. 7 |
0. 6 |
0 5. |
4.1 | 4. 3 |
| 89 ,8 00 |
90 ,9 26 |
90 ,9 21 |
1, 38 9 |
1, 38 9 |
1, 38 9 |
26 ,04 5 |
26 ,02 4 |
26 ,0 05 |
| 78 1,3 07 5, |
84 4, 36 5, 7 |
84 24 6 5, 5, |
84 92 ,0 |
84 92 ,0 |
84 92 ,0 |
60 1, 9,9 24 |
60 85 1, 9,0 |
60 8,0 64 1, |
| 4. 81 |
4. 86 |
4. 91 |
4. 82 |
4. 90 |
4. 94 |
4. 48 |
4. 51 |
4. 54 |
| 4. 1 |
3. 1 |
3. 2 |
0. 5 |
0. 8 |
0. 5 |
5. 4 |
4. 5 |
4. 5 |
| 98 1 |
98 6 |
99 6 |
||||||
| 19 2, 86 2 |
19 3, 42 0 |
19 4,1 13 |
||||||
| 21 ,2 45 |
96 21 ,5 |
21 ,5 79 |
The following table shows the distribution of assets by market segment. An updated market valuation was not performed in the first quarter. The rental yield on the portfolio based on inplace rents is still unchanged at 7.1 percent (rent multiplier: 14.0x).
| ke M t s ts ar eg m en |
Re sid tia l en its un |
Re sid tia l en (€ ) ts as se m |
Sh ar e sid tia l re en in % ts as se |
Va lue €/ sq m |
lac In -p e nt re ult ipl ier m |
l/ Co cia m m er he ot et r a ss s (€ ) m |
To l a ta et ss s (€ ) m |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hi gh th ke ts gr ow m ar |
31 ,4 88 |
36 2,1 |
46 | 1, 02 9 |
16 .0 x |
18 0 |
6 2, 31 |
|
| Sta ble ke wi th cti yi eld ts at tra m ar ve s |
32 ,0 39 |
1,4 15 |
31 | 68 4 |
12 .9 x |
82 | 1,4 97 |
|
| gh ldi ke Hi yie ts er ng m ar |
26 ,0 05 |
99 9 |
22 | 62 2 |
12 .1 x |
43 | 1, 04 2 |
|
| Su bt al NR W ot |
89 ,5 32 |
4, 55 1 |
98 | 79 1 |
14 .0 x |
30 5 |
4, 85 5 |
|
| No NR W n- |
1, 38 9 |
79 | 2 | 85 0 |
14 .5 x |
12 | 91 | |
| l P tfo lio To ta or |
90 ,9 21 |
4, 62 9 |
10 0 |
79 2 |
14 .0 x |
31 7 |
4, 94 6 |
|
| eh old d l d v alu (IA 6) Le S 1 as an an es |
28 | |||||||
| Inv rie s ( IA S 2 ) to en |
16 | |||||||
| To l b al sh ta t an ce ee |
4, 99 2 |
|||||||
| b ) d d ie in D 2 0 11 2 0 .0 0 0 M 5 te A N A LY S IS O F N ET A S S ET S FI N A N C IA L P O S IT IO N e ze m e r u n r u n rn e , |
d f h d h h i ü W te e s e r re n e n o n u n g su n rn e m e n n |
|
|---|---|---|
| D ch l d N ch d . A ri l 2 ll 1 0 10 ts A N D R ES U LT S O F O P E R A T IO N e u a n a e r z u m p v o zo g |
N is ti i d ie L EG -G i d st 14 e n e n e u o r g a n a o n ru p p e n e |
r |
| Fl ä ch it ie d rl d N 15 K S N TA RY O U P P L E M E R E P RT e m n e n e a ss n g e n n e n ce n u u u , |
d d ie rb ü in d d i n 1 0 0 M te te 2 1 rn n r n ro s e n re o u u |
rd |
| rh f li h h l d h in ä R io R in R st R E P O RT O N R IS K S A N D O P P O RT U N IT IE S e -w e sc e n e g n e n e a n u r g e , |
b d f l f k ie W O rä S ie t st rt t. 2 2 u n e a e n v o r p se n o u s |
|
| f f f si ic h d b i a d K h ä l d W h rt ts FO R EC A ST e s a e u a s e rn g e sc e o n |
f D b P io li ie 2 0 0 8 2 2 e n e n e g o n n e n e n ro e ss n a -s ru n |
g s |
Please see the glossary in the Annual Report 2012 for a definition of individual figures and terms.
The condensed income statement is as follows:
| CO ND EN SE D IN CO M E ST AT EN EM T |
||
|---|---|---|
| € illi m on |
01 .01 - 31 .03 .20 13 |
01 .01 .- 31 .03 .20 12 |
| nd le Ne e i t r t a en as nc om e |
59 .5 |
58 .3 |
| e f Ne t i th nc om ro m e dis l o f i tm t po sa nv es en ert pr op y |
-0 .2 |
-0 .6 |
| Ne t in fr th co me om e f t o re m ea su re m en inv tm t p rty es en ro pe |
0. 0 |
0. 0 |
| Ne t i e f th nc om ro m e dis l o f r l e sta te po sa ea inv to en ry |
-0 .9 |
-1 .0 |
| e f he Ne t i ot nc om ro m r ice se rv s |
0. 8 |
0. 7 |
| Ad ini ive d str at m an he ot r e xp en se s |
-1 1.4 |
-7 .7 |
| Ot he r i nc om e |
6 0. |
0. 7 |
| Op ing ing at er ea rn s |
48 .4 |
50 .4 |
| t f Ne ina ts nc e c os |
-3 6.5 |
-3 4. 5 |
| s b efo Ea ing inc rn re om e ta xe s |
11 .9 |
15 .9 |
| Inc e t om ax es |
.6 -0 |
1. 2 |
| Ne fit r l t p ro o os s fo he io d r t p er |
11 .3 |
17 .1 |
Operating earnings (before taxes) amounted to €48.4 million in the reporting period (1st January to 31st March 2013) and total €2.0 million less than the same period of the previous year (1st January to 31st March 2012). For this period, a net profit of €11.3 million (previous year: €17.1 million) was generated.
The condensed income statement for segment reporting in the Q1 2013 reporting period is as follows:
| 0. | 0. | 0. | 0. |
|---|---|---|---|
| 6 | 0 | 0 | 6 |
| -6 | -1 | 8. | -1 |
| .0 | 3.9 | 5 | 1.4 |
| 0.1 | 9. | -9 | 0. |
| 8 | .1 | 8 | |
| 0. | -0 | 0. | -0 |
| 0 | .9 | 0 | .9 |
| 0. | 0. | 0. | 0. |
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| -0 | -0 | 0. | -0 |
| .1 | .1 | 0 | .2 |
| 58 | 1. | -0 | 59 |
| .1 | 7 | .3 | .5 |
| -7 | 0. | -0 | -7 |
| 1.7 | 0 | .3 | 2.0 |
| 12 | 1.7 | 0. | 13 |
| 9.8 | 0 | 1.5 | |
| Re sid tia l en |
O th er |
Re ilia tio co nc n |
G ro up |
The Housing segment generated operating segment earnings of €52.7 million in the reporting period. The Other segment generated operating segment earnings of €-3.4 million.
The condensed income statement for the Q1 2012 comparison period by segment was as follows:
| Se ni t e gm en ar ng s |
49 .5 |
4. 2 |
-3 .3 |
50 .4 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| he Ot r i nc om e |
0. 6 |
0.1 | 0. 0 |
0. 7 |
| Ad ini ive d o th str at m an er ex pe ns es |
-9 .0 |
.2 -5 |
6. 5 |
-7 .7 |
| Ne t i e f he vic ot nc om ro m r s er es |
1.7 | 8. 4 |
-9 .4 |
0. 7 |
| e f th e d al of l e Ne t i isp inv sta te to nc om ro m os rea en ry |
-0 .2 |
-0 .8 |
0. 0 |
-1 .0 |
| e f th f Ne t i t o nc om ro m e r em ea su re m en inv tm t p rty es en ro pe |
0. 0 |
0. 0 |
0. 0 |
0. 0 |
| e f th e d als of Ne t i isp nc om ro m os inv tm t p rty es en ro pe |
-0 .5 |
-0 .1 |
0. 0 |
-0 .6 |
| Ne al nd le in t r et a as e co m e |
56 .9 |
1. 8 |
-0 .4 |
58 .3 |
| Co of les of al d l st nt sa re an ea se |
-6 7.2 |
0. 3 |
-0 .1 |
-6 7.0 |
| al d lea Re in nt an se co m e |
12 4.1 |
1.5 | -0 .3 |
12 5.3 |
| € illi m on |
Re sid tia l en |
O th er |
Re ilia tio co nc n |
G ro up |
The Housing segment generated operating segment earnings of €49.5 million in the comparison period. The Other segment generated operating segment earnings of €4.2 million.
The largest share of income in the Other segment is accounted for by income from service agreements between LEG Management GmbH and
property companies in the Housing segment. The resulting income in the Other segment and the corresponding expenses in the Housing segment are internal to the Group and are eliminated in the "Reconciliation" column.
Intragroup transactions between the segments are conducted at arm's length conditions.
| NE NT AL A ND EA SE T RE L |
IN CO M E |
|
|---|---|---|
| illi € m on |
01 .01 .- 31 .0 3.2 01 3 |
01 .01 .- 31 .0 3.2 01 2 |
| Gr l in ta os s r en co m e of hic h: old t c nt w ne re |
89 .4 89 .2 |
85 .8 85 .6 |
| Ot he r i nc om e |
42 .1 |
39 .5 |
| al d l Re in nt an ea se co m e (g ) ro ss |
13 1.5 |
12 5.3 |
| rch ed Pu ice as se rv s |
-5 8.7 |
-5 1.8 |
| St aff sts co of hic h I PO sts w co |
-9 .8 -2 .1 |
-7 .7 0. 0 |
| d De iat ion pr ec an tis ion at am or ex pe ns es |
-1 .1 |
-1 .1 |
| Ot he ing rat r o pe ex pe ns es |
-4 .5 |
-6 .4 |
| bu IPO im st t co re rse m en |
2.1 | 0. 0 |
| of les of Co in st sa ith al tio nt co nn ec n w re d l in an ea se co m e |
2.0 -7 |
-6 7.0 |
| l a nd Ne t r ta en lea in se co m e |
59 .5 |
58 .3 |
Rental and lease income increased by €6.2 million year-on-year in the reporting period. The main driver in this development was an increase in net rent of 4.2 per cent to €89.2 million (previous year: €85.6 million).
In the reporting period, recoverable operating costs were €2.2 million higher than in the same period of the previous year. This contributed to the rise in cost of purchased services. At the same time, this led to a rise in the capitalisation of work in progress from operating costs, which is reported in other income. Compared to prior year, maintenance costs in the reporting period rose by €5.1 million to €12.2 million. This temporary effect is the main reason that the overall net rental and lease income did not show a higher growth rate in the first quarter.
Following the successful conclusion of the IPO in February 2013, performance bonuses of €4.7 million were granted to employees. The share of this cost that was allocated to the cost of sales in connection with rental and lease income was €2.1 million. The performance bonuses were charged in full to the shareholders Restio B.V. and Perry Luxco RE and do not impact the net rental and lease income.
The LEG Group invested selectively in its portfolios in the reporting period, in line with and taking into account its social charter specifications. At €19.2 million, total capital expenditures were €2.8 million higher than in the same period of the previous year.
| M AI NT EN AN CE A ND M O O F I NV ES TM EN T PR O PE RT |
O N |
|
|---|---|---|
| illi € m on |
01 .01 .- 31 .0 3.2 01 3 |
01 .01 .- 31 .0 3.2 01 2 |
| M ain ta na nc e e xp en se s of in stm t p rty ve en ro pe |
12 .2 |
7.1 |
| al nd Ca pit itu ex pe re |
7.0 | 9. 3 |
| To l in ta st t ve m en |
19 .2 |
16 .4 |
| of Ar in stm t ea ve en y i illi ert pr op n m on sq m |
6. 04 |
97 5. |
| Av e i tm t er ag nv es en (€ ) p er sq m |
3. 2 |
2. 7 |
Value-add measures were performed in the amount of €7.0 million in the reporting period (previous year: €9.3 million). Compared to the same period of the previous year, maintenance expense increased by €5.1 million. There were no modernisation projects in Q1 2012.
| NE T IN CO M E F RO M T HE D IS PO SA L O F I NV ES TM EN T PR O PE RT Y |
||
|---|---|---|
| illi € m on |
01 .01 .- 31 .0 3.2 01 3 |
01 .01 .- 31 .0 3.2 01 2 |
| Inc e f th e d isp al om ro m os of inv est nt ert me pr op y |
1.8 | 6 2. |
| of Ca ing in nt st rry am ou ve y d isp ed of nt ert me pr op os |
-1 .7 |
-3 .0 |
| of les of Co in st stm t sa ve en of y d isp ed ert pr op os |
-0 .3 |
-0 .2 |
| e f th Ne t i nc om ro m e f i di al tm t sp os o nv es en ty pr op er |
-0 .2 |
-0 .6 |
As a result of selective portfolio streamlining, less investment property (37 residential units) was sold in the reporting period. The LEG Group sold these properties at slightly more than their book value.
Staff and non-staff operating costs for investment property were virtually unchanged compared to the same period of the previous year.
| NE T IN CO M E F RO M T HE |
D IS PO SA L |
|
|---|---|---|
| O EA ST AT NV EN F R L E E I |
TO RY |
|
| illi € m on |
01 .01 .- 31 .0 3.2 01 3 |
01 .01 .- 31 .0 3.2 01 2 |
| e f th e d al Inc isp om ro m os of al e i tat to re es nv en ry |
0.4 | 1.5 |
| fr Ca ing nt rry am ou om th e d al of al isp tat os re es e inv to en ry |
-0 .3 |
-1 .2 |
| of les Co in tio st sa co nn ec n th th e d al of l wi isp os rea in est ate nt ve ory |
-1 .0 |
-1. 3 |
| e f Ne t i th nc om ro m e f r di l o l e st at as po sa ea e in nt ve or y |
-0 .9 |
-1 .0 |
The sale of the remaining properties of the former Development Division continued in the reporting period. The remaining inventory properties as of 31st March 2012 amounted to €16.1 million, €11.7 million of which relate to properties under development.
Savings in staff costs contributed towards a slight decline in the cost of sales of sold inventory properties.
| OT HE R SE RV IC ES |
||
|---|---|---|
| illi € m on |
01 .01 .- 31 .0 3.2 01 3 |
01 .01 .- 31 .0 3.2 01 2 |
| e f he Inc ot om ro m r ice se rv s |
2.5 | 2.9 |
| Ex in tio pe ns es co nn ec n th he wi vic ot r s er es |
-1 .7 |
-2 .2 |
| t i e f Ne nc om ro m he vi ot r s er ce s |
0. 8 |
0. 7 |
Net income from other services essentially includes income from electricity and heat fed to the grid.
The business volume for management services for third-party properties declined further in 2012; some existing agreements were terminated as of 31st December 2012. The level of third-party properties still managed in 2013 is negligible.
| AD IN IST RA VE A ND M TI |
||
|---|---|---|
| OT EX NS ES HE R PE |
||
| illi € m on |
01 .01 .- 31 .0 3.2 01 3 |
01 .01 .- 31 .0 3.2 01 2 |
| IPO im bu st t co re rse m en |
8.2 | 0.0 |
| aff St sts co |
-8 .4 |
-4 .5 |
| rch ed Pu ice as se rv s |
-0 .3 |
-0 .3 |
| De iat ion d pr ec an tis ion at am or |
-0 .5 |
-0 .5 |
| Ot he ing rat r o pe ex pe ns es |
-1 0.4 |
-2 .3 |
| he Ot r t ax es |
0. 0 |
-0 .1 |
| Ad iis iv nd tr at m e a he ot r e xp en se s |
-1 1.4 |
-7 .7 |
The company-wide activities to prepare for and perform the IPO caused higher consulting costs in the first quarter of 2013 in comparison to the same quarter of the previous year. Administrative and other expenses for the comparison period benefited from a non-recurring positive effect from the release of provisions.
The share of consulting and non-staff operating costs caused directly by the IPO (€5.7 million) and the employee performance bonuses for the successful IPO (€4.7 million), as well as insurance liabilities were also charged to the shareholders Saturea B.V. and Perry Luxco RE and, therefore, do not impact the net profit.
The performance bonuses for employees of €4.7 million are broken down as follows:
The IPO cost reimbursement therefore amounted to €10.4 million in the reporting period; of which
In addition to the reimbursed performance bonuses of €2.5 million, €1.0 million from the initial recognition of the long-term incentive contracts
also contributed to a rise in staff costs.
Including the IPO cost reimbursement of €5.7 million and a positive non-recurring effect in the previous year, other operating expenses remained virtually unchanged.
| Ne t f in st an ce co s |
-3 6. 5 |
-3 4. 5 |
|---|---|---|
| e f th e f Ne t i air nc om ro m lue f t o va m ea su re m en de riv ate |
-1. 7 |
-0 .2 |
| Ne t i e f he ot nc om ro m r fin l a cia ts an sse |
0.1 | 1.4 |
| Ne t i t i nt er es nc om e |
-3 4. 9 |
-3 5.7 |
| Int t e er es xp en se |
-3 5.1 |
-3 6.1 |
| Int t i er es nc om e |
0.2 | 0.4 |
| illi € m on |
01 .01 .- 31 .0 3.2 01 3 |
01 .01 .- 31 .0 3.2 01 2 |
| NE T FIN AN CE C OS TS |
The refinancing amounts drawn in the reporting period resulted from agreements concluded in 2012. Prepayment penalties on refinancing activity in 2013 were therefore already reflected in balance sheet provisions as of 31st December 2012. In contrast to the same period of the previous year (prepayment penalties: €1.1 million), there were, therefore, no expenses for prepayment penalties in the reporting period.
LEG has been able to reduce the overall cost of debt through the refinancing program. After adjustment for prepayment penalties and other items, cash interest expenses reduced to €20.6 million (previous year: €22.0 million). The amount of cash interest payable each quarter varies across the year.
A key performance indicator in the LEG Group is FFO. The LEG Group distinguishes between FFO I (not including net income from the disposal of investment property) and FFO II (including net income from the disposal of investment property) and AFFO (FFO I adjusted for capex). Details of the calculation for each indicator can be found in the glossary of the Annual Report 2012.
FFO I, FFO II and AFFO were calculated as follows in the reporting period and the same period of the previous year:
| CA LC UL AT IO N O F F FO I, |
FF O II UN D |
AF FO |
|---|---|---|
| 01 .01 .- |
01 .01 .- |
|
| € illi m on |
31 .03 .20 13 |
31 .03 .20 12 |
| fit r lo fo he Ne t p r t ro o ss d ( S) rio IFR pe |
11 .3 |
17 .1 |
| Int t i er es nc om e |
-0 .2 |
-0 .4 |
| Int t e er es xp en se s |
35 .1 |
36 .1 |
| Ne t i t i nt er es nc om e |
34 .9 |
35 .7 |
| he r f ial Ot ina nc ex pe ns es |
1.6 | -1. 2 |
| Inc e t om ax es |
6 0. |
-1. 2 |
| EB IT |
48 .4 |
50 .4 |
| De iat ion tis ion at pr ec , a m or d w rit do an e- wn s |
2.1 | 2.2 |
| EB IT DA |
50 .5 |
52 .6 |
| t f lue M air t a ea su rem en va of in stm t p rty ve en ro pe |
0. 0 |
0. 0 |
| IP (lo LT inc tiv -te ng rm en e e) pr og ram m |
1.0 | 0. 0 |
| No rin roj t c ts n- rec ur g p ec os |
1.8 | 2. 0 |
| din d p Ex rio tra or ary an r rio d e d i pe xp en ses an nc om e |
-0 .2 |
-0 .2 |
| e f th Ne t i nc om ro m e f i dis l o tm t po sa nv es en ert pr op y |
0. 2 |
6 0. |
| e f th e d Ne t i is nc om ro m l o f r l e inv sta te to po sa ea en ry |
0. 9 |
1.0 |
| Ad ju ed E BI TD A st |
54 .2 |
56 .0 |
| Ca sh in te rst ex pe ns es d i an nc om e |
-2 0.6 |
-2 2.0 |
| Ca sh in e t co m ax es |
0. 2 |
1.5 |
| FF O I ( t i lu di no nc ng di al of in st t sp os ve m en ) ty er pr op |
33 .8 |
35 .5 |
| Ne t in fr th e d isp al co me om os of in stm t p rty ve en ro pe |
-0 .2 |
.6 -0 |
| FF O II ( in clu di d isp al ng os of in y) st t p rt ve m en ro pe |
.6 33 |
34 .9 |
| dit Ca pe x e xp en ur e |
-7 .0 |
-9 .3 |
| Ad ju ed (A O) F FO I FF st |
26 .8 |
26 .2 |
At €33.8 million in the reporting period, FFO I (not including net income from the disposal of investment property) was 4.8 per cent lower than in the same period of the previous year (€ 35.5 million), which was primarily due to the €5.1 million rise in maintenance expenses. Further, in the reporting period, reimbursements of corporate and trade taxes for past financial years were €1.3
million lower than in the same period of the previous year. This was offset by the €3.6 million increase in basic rents and a reduction in cash interest expenses of €1.4 million.
As a result, FFO I was €1.7 million lower in the reporting period than in the same period of the previous year.
| CO ND EN SE BA LA NC E S D |
HE ET |
|
|---|---|---|
| illi € m on |
31 .0 3.2 01 3 |
31 .12 .20 12 |
| Inv tm t p rty es en ro pe |
4, 94 3.2 |
4, 93 7.1 |
| he Ot nt ts r n on -cu rre as se |
11 1.3 |
11 4.1 |
| No nt ts n- cu rre as se |
5, 05 4. 5 |
5, 05 1.2 |
| Re iva ble nd he ot ts ce s a r a sse |
.8 71 |
50 .7 |
| sh d c h e len Ca iva ts an as qu |
12 0.2 |
13 3.7 |
| Cu nt ts rre as se |
19 2.0 |
18 4.4 |
| As he ld fo r d al isp ts se os |
4. 5 |
2. 2 |
| To l a ta et ss s |
25 1.0 5, |
23 7.8 5, |
| Eq uit y |
2, 14 7.3 |
2, 08 5.5 |
| No fin cia l nt n- cu rre an lia bil itie s |
2, 30 2.4 |
2,1 02 .9 |
| Ot he t l iab ilit ies r c ur ren |
47 3.2 |
48 0.2 |
| bo d No nt n- cu rre rro we pit al ca |
2, 77 5.6 |
2, 58 3.1 |
| fin l li ab ilit Cu cia ies nt rre an |
18 5.7 |
39 6.8 |
| Ot he t l iab ilit ies r c ur ren |
14 2.4 |
17 2.4 |
| Cu bo d c ita l nt rre rro we ap |
32 8.1 |
56 9.2 |
| l e d lia bi lit To ity ies ta qu an |
5, 25 1.0 |
5, 23 7.8 |
Total assets amounted to €5,251.0 million as of the end of the reporting period (31st December 2012: €5,237.8 million).
The largest item on the assets side is non-current assets at €5,054.5 million. The main asset of the LEG Group is investment property of €4,943.2 million as of 31st March 2013 (31st December 2012: €4,937.1 million), which accounts for 94.1 per cent of total assets (31st December 2012: 94.2 per cent).
The main equity and liability items are the reported equity of €2,147.3 million (31st December 2012: €2,085.5 million) and the financial liabilities
of €2,488.1 million (31st December 2012: €2,499.7 million).
Receivables of €17.8 million accrued as of 31st March 2013 from the IPO cost reimbursement of €10.4 million for the reporting period and €7.4 million for the financial year 2012. These are reported in receivables and other assets.
In the reporting period, €40.5 million were paid in to the capital reserves by the shareholders Perry Luxco S.à. r.l. and Restio B.V. by way of transfer of a shareholder loan to LEG Immobilien AG. The transaction resulted in the conversion of debt under other current liabilities into equity.
Another key performance indicator in the LEG Group is NAV. Details of the calculation system for each indicator can be found in the glossary in the Annual Report.
As of 31st March 2013, the LEG Group reported an EPRA NAV of €2,422.7 million, which corresponds to an EPRA NAV of €45.74 per share.
| EP RA -N AV |
||
|---|---|---|
| € illi m on |
31 .03 .20 13 |
31 .12 .20 12 |
| Eq ui ty |
2, 14 7.3 |
2, 08 5. 5 |
| No : S ha ho ld lo te re er an s b ed uit to rt to e c on ve eq y |
40 .5 |
|
| Eff f e rci sin ion t o pt ec xe g o s, ibl igh d o th ert ts co nv e r an er rig hts |
0.0 | 0. 0 |
| NA V |
2, 14 7.3 |
2, 08 5. 5 |
| alu f Fa ir v t o e m ea su re m en de fin l in riv cia ate str ts an um en |
78 .9 |
89 .7 |
| fe d t De rre ax es |
19 6.5 |
19 3.1 |
| EP RA N AV |
2, 42 2. 7 |
36 2, 8. 3 |
| f s Nu be ha m r o re |
52 ,9 63 ,44 4 |
|
| sh EP RA -N AV e i n € p er ar |
45 .74 |
Compared to 31st December 2012, net debt in relation to property assets declined slightly. The loan-to-value ratio (LTV) therefore amounts to 47.86 per cent (31st December 2012: 47.90 per cent). This figure as of the end of this reporting period does not include the cash reimbursement of IPO cost of €17.8 million.
| LO AN T O VA LU E R AT IO |
||
|---|---|---|
| illi € m on |
31 .0 3.2 01 3 |
31 .12 .20 12 |
| l li ab ilit Fin cia ies an |
2, 48 8.1 |
2, 49 9.7 |
| Le sh d c h ss ca an as uiv ale nt eq s |
12 0.2 |
13 3.7 |
| t f Ne ina ial lia bil itie nc s |
2, 36 7.9 |
2, 36 6.0 |
| Inv tm t p rty es en ro pe |
4, 94 3.2 |
4, 93 7.1 |
| As s h eld fo ale set r s |
4. 5 |
2. 2 |
| 4, 94 7.7 |
4, 93 9.3 |
|
| (L ) Lo al TV to an v ue tio in % ra |
47 .8 6 |
47 .9 0 |
A net profit of €11.3 million was generated (previous year: €17.1 million) in the reporting period. Equity amounted to €2,147.3 million as of the end of the reporting period (31st December 2012: €2,085.5 million). This corresponds to an equity ratio of 40.9 per cent (31st December 2012: 39.8 per cent).
As part of the refinancing, new loans in the amount of €200.6 million were closed in Q1 2013. The newly concluded loans were primarily used for the repayment of existing loans.
Equity was boosted by an additional €40.5 million by the transfer of a shareholder loan by Restio B.V. and Perry Luxco S.à. r.l. to LEG Immobilien AG (as a contribution to capital reserves).
The condensed statement of cash flows of the LEG Group for the reporting period is as follows:
| ST AT EM EN T O F C AS H FL OW S |
||
|---|---|---|
| € illi m on |
01 .01 .- 31 .0 3.2 01 3 |
01 .01 .- 31 .0 3.2 01 2 |
| sh fl s f m/ ed Ca ow ro us ing tiv itie at op er ac s |
14 .8 |
44 .6 |
| sh fl s f m/ ed Ca ow ro us inv tin cti vit ies es g a |
-8 .0 |
-7 .5 |
| Ca sh fl s f m/ ed ow ro us fin cin cti vit ies an g a |
-2 0.3 |
-6 .5 |
| Ch s i sh nd an ge n ca a sh le iva nt ca e qu s |
-1 3. 5 |
30 .6 |
Cash flow from operating activities of €14.8 million was generated in the reporting period (previous year: €44.6 million). Higher costs for the IPO, other non-recurring project costs and higher maintenance expenses were payable in the reporting period. This was offset by postponed payments as part of the SAP introduction in the same period of the previous year, which meant that a larger share of invoices was settled after 31st March 2012. These effects resulted in a decline in cash flow from operating activities, despite increasing revenues and lower cash interest expenses.
The cash flow from investing activities amounted to €-8.0 million (previous year: €-7.5 million) and primarily includes payments for the modernisation of investment property in both the reporting period and the same period of the previous year. As of the end of the financial year 2012, prepayment penalties of €10.4 million were accrued for new loans which closed in Q1 2013. These were paid in the reporting period and were a key factor why the cash flow resulting from financing activities had a higher negative balance compared to the same period of the previous year.
The LEG Group was solvent at all times in the reporting period.
The acquisition of a property portfolio of around 2,200 residential units was notarised 15th May 2013. The portfolio generates annual net rent of approx. €6.1 million. The portfolio is primarily concentrated in stable markets and has good synergies with LEG's existing portfolio. Average in-place rents amount to €4.74 per square metre, the initial vacancy rate is 8 per cent and the initial FFO return is in line with LEG's return expectations for acquisitions. Closing for the transaction is expected for 1st August 2013. The acquisition price is subject to a non-disclosure agreement.
Further refinancing loan tranches were utilised in the amount of €21.6 million at individual Group companies after 31st March 2013.
May 2013 saw the signing of the remaining loan in the refinancing program in the amount of €72.5 million. The loan agreement was concluded with a German Pfandbriefbank and has a ten year term.
The risks and opportunities to which LEG is exposed in its operating activities were described in detail in the Annual Report 2012. In the 2013 financial year to date, no further risks have arisen or become identifiable that would lead to a different assessment.
We believe that the operational performance in the first quarter of 2013 confirms our forecast for 2013 as a whole. In the base scenario – i.e. not including further acquisitions - LEG is forecasting an FFO I (not including income from disposals) ranging from €137 million to €140 million. This forecast is based on rental income growth above two percent on a like-for-like basis, a further reduction in vacancies (to below three percent in the medium term) and capex and maintenance of around €13 per square metre p. a. in order to further develop the portfolio at a sustainable level and exceed the social charter requirement of €12.50. The planned annual capex and maintenance expense is therefore still in the range of €77-80 million.
LEG intends to generate additional growth through value-add acquisitions. Overall, around 5,000 units are planned to be bought in 2013, of which around 2,200 are expected to close on 1st August 2013. This recent acquisition is expected to increase FFO I by a further approx. €1 million in 2013. Further portfolios are currently in the due diligence phase.
The company is planning to distribute 65 per cent of the FFO I generated in fiscal 2013 as a dividend.
| C O N S O L ID A T E D S TA T E M E N T O F FI N A N C IA L P O S IT IO N |
|
|---|---|
| ST A R C H 3 1 M 2 0 13 – |
2 5 |
| C O S O S O C O S C O N L ID A T E D TA T E M E N T F M P R E H E N IV E IN M E |
|
| 3 1 ST M A R C H 2 0 13 – |
2 6 |
| C O N S O A S TA N O C A S LO W S L ID T E D T E M E T F H F |
|
| 3 1 ST M A R C H 2 0 13 – |
2 7 |
| S E L EC T E D N O T ES |
2 8 |
| ST A N O C A N G ES N C O N S O A Q Y T E M E T F H I L ID T E D E U IT |
4 0 |
| AS SE TS |
||
|---|---|---|
| illi € m on |
31 .0 3.2 01 3 |
31 .12 .20 12 |
| No t a et n- cu rr en ss s |
5, 05 4. 5 |
5, 05 1.2 |
| Inv tm t p rty es en ro pe |
4,9 43 .2 |
4, 93 7.1 |
| Pr pla d e ipm ert nt t op y, an qu en |
70 .7 |
72 .3 |
| gib le Int ts an as se |
5.5 | 5. 9 |
| Inv in cia tm ts te es en as so s |
8.3 | 8. 3 |
| Ot he r f ina ial ts nc as se |
5.0 | 4. 9 |
| ble nd he Re iva ot ts ce s a r a sse |
1.9 | 1.9 |
| fe d t De ts rre ax as se |
19 .9 |
20 .8 |
| Cu t a et rr en ss s |
19 6. 5 |
18 6. 6 |
| d o th Inv ies inv rie to ert to en ry pr op an er en s |
16 .3 |
17 .4 |
| Re ble nd he iva ot ts ce s a r a sse |
53 .3 |
31 .3 |
| Inc iva ble e t om ax re ce s |
2.2 | 2. 0 |
| sh d c h e len Ca iva ts an as qu |
12 0.2 |
13 3.7 |
| As he ld fo ale ts se r s |
4.5 | 2. 2 |
| To l a ta et ss s |
25 1.0 5, |
23 7.8 5, |
| EQ UI TY A ND L IA BI LIT IES |
||
|---|---|---|
| illi € m on |
31 . 0 3. 20 13 |
31 .12 .20 12 |
| ui Eq ty |
2,1 47 .3 |
2, 08 5. 5 |
| Iss d c ita l ue ap |
53 .0 |
53 .0 |
| Ca pit al res er ve s |
47 7.6 |
43 6.1 |
| ula th Cu tiv m e o er re se rv es |
1,5 91 .1 |
1, 57 1.5 |
| ibu ble sh eh old f t he Eq uit ttr ta to t c y a ar er s o p ar en om pa ny |
2,1 21 .7 |
06 0.6 2, |
| No llin g i nt nt ts n- co ro er es |
25 .6 |
24 .9 |
| t l ia bi lit ie No n- cu rr en s |
2, 77 5. 6 |
2, 58 3.1 |
| Pr isi s f sio ov on or p en ns |
12 2.8 |
12 1.5 |
| he Ot vis ion r p ro s |
12 .1 |
12 .2 |
| l li ab ilit Fin cia ies an |
2,3 02 .4 |
2,1 02 .9 |
| Ot he r l iab ilit ies |
90 .0 |
10 1.2 |
| Ta x l iab ilit ies |
31 .8 |
31 .4 |
| fe d t lia bil De iti rre ax es |
21 6.5 |
21 3.9 |
| Cu t l ia bi lit ie rr en s |
32 8.1 |
56 9. 2 |
| s f Pr isi sio ov on or p en ns |
4.4 | 5. 8 |
| he Ot vis ion r p ro s |
18 .3 |
20 .1 |
| Pr isi s f ta ov on or xe s |
0.0 | 0.1 |
| Fin cia l li ab ilit ies an |
18 5.7 |
39 6.8 |
| he r l iab ilit Ot ies |
99 .8 |
12 5.5 |
| x l iab ilit Ta ies |
19 .9 |
20 .9 |
| Lia bil iti in tio ith he ld fo r d isp al ts es co nn ec n w as se os |
- | - |
| To l e ity nd li ab ili tie ta qu a s |
5, 25 1.0 |
5, 23 7.8 |
| illi € m on |
01 .01 .-3 1.0 3.2 01 3 |
01 .01 .-3 1.0 3.2 01 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Ne l a nd le in t r ta en as e co m e |
59 .5 |
58 .3 |
| Re al d lea in nt an se co m e |
13 1.5 |
12 5.3 |
| Co of les in tio ith al d lea st nt sa co nn ec n w re an se |
-72 .0 |
-6 7.0 |
| Ne t i e f th e d isp al f i tm t p rt nc om ro m os o nv es en ro pe y |
-0 .2 |
.6 -0 |
| Inc e f th e d isp al of in stm t p rty om ro m os ve en ro pe |
1.8 | 6 2. |
| Ca of d ed of ing in isp nt stm t p rty rry am ou ve en ro pe os |
-1. 7 |
-3 .0 |
| Co of les ith d ed of in tio in isp st stm t p rty sa co nn ec n w ve en ro pe os |
-0 .3 |
-0 .2 |
| t i e f th f i Ne t o tm t p rt nc om ro m e r em ea su re m en nv es en ro pe y |
0. 0 |
0. 0 |
| t i e f th e d isp al f r l e in Ne st at nt nc om ro m os o ea e ve or y |
-0 .9 |
-1 .0 |
| e f of th l e dis d o f Inc inv sta te to om ro m e r ea en ry po se |
0.4 | 1.5 |
| of al dis d o f Ca ing e i nt tat to rry am ou re es nv en ry po se |
-0 .3 |
-1 .2 |
| of les ith al dis d o f Co in tio e i st tat to sa co nn ec n w re es nv en ry po se |
-1 .0 |
-1 .3 |
| e f Ne t i th ice nc om ro m o er se rv s |
0. 8 |
0. 7 |
| e f he Inc vic ot om ro m r s er es |
2.5 | 2. 9 |
| Ex in tio ith he vic ot pe ns es co nn ec n w r s er es |
-1. 7 |
-2 .2 |
| Ad in ist tiv nd th m ra e a o er ex pe ns es |
-1 1.4 |
-7 .7 |
| Ot he r i nc om e |
0. 6 |
0. 7 |
| Op in in at er g ea rn gs |
48 .4 |
50 .4 |
| Int t i er es nc om e |
0.2 | 0. 4 |
| Int t e er es xp en se s |
-3 5.1 |
6.1 -3 |
| Ne e f nd he t i inv itie ity in tm t s ot stm ts nc om ro m es en ec ur s a r e qu ve en |
0.1 | 1.4 |
| Ne e f th e f lue f d t i air iva t o te nc om ro m va m ea su re m en er s |
-1 .7 |
-0 .2 |
| rin b ef in Ea e t gs or e co m ax es |
11 .9 |
15 .9 |
| Inc e t om ax es |
-0 .6 |
1.2 |
| fit r l s f th io d Ne t p ro o os or e p er |
11 .3 |
17 .1 |
| Ch d di ly in ni in ity nt ct an ge a m ou s r ec og se re e qu |
||
| f i Fa ir lu dj e d iva s i he dg tm t o nt t r at te va e a us en er es er n es |
8. 6 |
-7 .3 |
| Ch lise d g s/ los in ain an ge nr ea se s u |
11 .1 |
-9 .8 |
| ed d ly Inc nis ire in uit e t nt ct om ax es on am ou s r ec og eq y |
-2 .5 |
2. 5 |
| On hi ch lin w n on -re yc g |
||
| Ac ia l g ai nd lo fr th f p sio ob lig io tu t o at ar ns a ss es om e m ea su re m en en n ns |
0. 0 |
0. 0 |
| Ch in lise d g ain s/ los an ge u nr ea se s |
0.0 | 0. 0 |
| Inc nis ed d ire ly in uit e t nt ct om ax es on am ou s r ec og eq y |
0. 0 |
0. 0 |
| l c eh siv in To ta om pr en e co m e |
19 .9 |
9. 8 |
| Ne fit lo fo he io d ib ab le t p r t at tr ut to ro ss p er : |
||
| No llin g i nt nt ts n- co ro er es |
0.3 | 2. 3 |
| sh ho lde Pa nt re are rs |
11 .0 |
14 .8 |
| l c eh siv in rib ab le To ta tt ut to om pr en e co m e a : |
||
| llin No g i nt nt ts n- co ro er es |
0.3 | 1.1 |
| sh ho lde Pa nt re are rs |
19 .6 |
8. 7 |
| sh e ( ba nd nd ilu d) Ea in sic in € te rn gs p er ar a u |
0. 2 |
1. 1 |
| illi € m on |
01 .01 .-3 1.0 3.2 01 3 |
01 .01 .-3 1.0 3.2 01 2 |
|---|---|---|
| in b ef in nd Ea te st ta rn gs or e re a xe s |
46 .8 |
51 .7 |
| lan nd nd gib le De iat ion uip tis ion n i rty t a t a at nt ts pr ec o n p ro pe , p eq m en am or o an as se |
2.1 | 2. 2 |
| (G s)/ he f i ain Lo n t t o tm t p rty sse s o re m ea su re m en nv es en ro pe |
- | - |
| (G s)/ s f ain Lo cia te sse ro m as so s |
- | - |
| (G ain s)/ Lo he d isp al of he ld fo ale d i n t ts tm t p rty sse s o os as se r s an nv es en ro pe |
-0 .1 |
0. 4 |
| (G ain s)/ Lo he d isp al of in ibl d p lan nd uip n t ta ts rty t a t sse s o os ng e a sse an ro pe , p eq m en |
0. 0 |
0. 0 |
| (G s)/ he d al of ain Lo isp in in cia n t stm ts te sse s o os ve en as so s |
- | - |
| (R ed n) /i nd he tio in sio vis ion vis ion ot nt uc nc rea se p en n p ro s a r n on -cu rre p ro s |
-0 .2 |
-0 .3 |
| (G s)/ he fa alu f d ain Lo ir v iva tiv n t t o sse s o e m ea su re m en er es |
1.7 | 0. 2 |
| he sh nd Ot in r n on -ca co m e a ex pe ns es |
-4 .5 |
0. 9 |
| (R ed n) /i ble nd he tio in iva inv rie to ot ts uc nc rea se re ce s, en s a r a sse |
-2 3.8 |
-1 0.7 |
| du /( ) i n l iab ilit (n clu din g f ial lia bil s) d p Re cti inc ies in ina itie vis ion ot on rea se nc an ro s |
14 .5 |
22 .4 |
| Ch d efe d t of r l in in it o an ge rre ax es pr os s |
-0 .9 |
-0 .3 |
| aid Int t p er es |
-2 0.9 |
-2 2.3 |
| ed Int eiv t r er es ec |
0.3 | 0. 3 |
| Ta eiv ed xe s r ec |
0.3 | 0.1 |
| Ta aid xe s p |
-0 .5 |
0. 0 |
| Ne h fr /( ed in ) o tin tiv iti t c as om us pe ra g ac es |
14 .8 |
44 .6 |
| Ca sh fl fr in in tiv iti st ow om ve g ac es |
||
| Inv in inv tm ts tm t p rty es en es en ro pe |
.6 -9 |
.6 -8 |
| Pr ds fr d als of he ld fo ale d i isp nt ts tm t p rty oc ee om os n on -cu rre as se r s an nv es en ro pe |
1.8 | 6 2. |
| gib le d p lan nd Inv in int uip tm ts ts rty t a t es en an as se an ro pe , p eq m en |
-0 .2 |
-1 .4 |
| ds fr d als of ibl d p lan nd Pr isp in uip ta ts rty t a t oc ee om os ng e a sse an ro pe , p eq m en |
0. 0 |
0. 0 |
| fin l a d o th Inv in cia tm ts ts ts es en an sse an er as se |
- | - |
| ds fr d als of fi ial d o th Pr isp ts ts oc ee om os na nc as se an er as se |
- | - |
| Inv in cia tm ts te es en as so s |
- | - |
| ds fr d als of Pr isp cia te oc ee om os as so s |
- | - |
| of sh lid d c Ac isit ion s i nie ate qu are n c on so om pa s |
- | -0 .2 |
| ds fr d als of sh lid d c Pr isp s i nie ate oc ee om os are n c on so om pa s |
- | 0.1 |
| fr /( ) i Ne h ed in tin tiv iti t c as om us nv es g ac es |
-8 .0 |
-7 .5 |
| Ca sh fl fr fi in tiv iti ow om na nc g ac es |
||
| Bo wi of b k l rro ng an oa ns |
23 4.4 |
14 0.4 |
| Re f b k l t o pa ym en an oa ns |
-2 53 .9 |
46 -1 .1 |
| Re f l lia bil itie t o pa ym en ea se s |
-0 .8 |
-0 .8 |
| Lo s f sh ho lde an ro m are rs |
- | - |
| sh ho lde Lo ts to an re pa ym en are rs |
- | - |
| Ca al rib pit ion nt ut co s |
- | - |
| ith dr als fr W aw om re se rv es |
- | - |
| ibu d w ith dr als fr fro llin Di tio g i str nt nt ts ns an aw om re se rv es m no n n on -co ro er es |
- | - |
| h fr /( ed in ) f in cin tiv iti Ne t c as om us an g ac es |
-2 0. 3 |
-6 .5 |
| Ch sh nd sh al in iv ts an ge ca a ca e qu en |
-1 3. 5 |
30 .6 |
| sh d c h e len be f p iod Ca iva gin nin ts at an as qu g o er |
13 3.7 |
81 .8 |
| f p Ca sh nd sh iv al nd io d ts t e a ca e qu en a o er |
12 0. 2 |
11 2. 4 |
| of Co sit io sh nd sh iv al ts m po n ca a ca e qu en |
||
| Ca sh in h d, ba nk b ala an nc es |
12 0.2 |
11 2.4 |
| Ca sh nd sh iv al nd f p io d ts t e a ca e qu en a o er |
12 0. 2 |
11 2. 4 |
LEG Immobilien AG, Dusseldorf (hereinafter: "LEG Immo"; formerly LEG Immobilien GmbH, formerly Lancaster GmbH & Co. KG), its subsidiary LEG NRW GmbH, Dusseldorf (formerly: LEG Landesent wicklungsgesellschaft Nordrhein-Westfalen GmbH, Dusseldorf, hereinafter: "LEG") and the latter's subsidiaries (hereinafter collectively referred to as the "LEG Group") are among the leading residential property companies in the state of North Rhine-Westphalia. As of 31st March 2013, the LEG Group had a portfolio of 91,917 units (residential and commercial).
LEG Immo, Hans-Böckler-Strasse 38, 40476 Dusseldorf, Germany, was formed on 9th May 2008 and is entered in the commercial register of the Dusseldorf Local Court under HRB 69386. LEG NRW, the main subsidiary of LEG Immo, was formed in 1970. The company is also domiciled at Hans-Böckler-Strasse 38, 40476 Dusseldorf, Germany, and is entered in the commercial register of the Dusseldorf Local Court under HRB 12200.
LEG Immo and its subsidiaries engage in two core activities as an integrated property company: the value-add long-term management of its residential property portfolio and the strategic acquisition of residential portfolios in order to generate long-term value enhancement.
By way of entry in the commercial register on 11th January 2013, LEG Immobilien GmbH underwent a change in legal form and was renamed LEG Immobilien AG.
LEG Immo went public on 1st February 2013 with the initial listing of its shares in the Regulated Market (Prime Standard) of the Frankfurt Stock Exchange.
The consolidated interim financial statements have been prepared in Euro. Unless indicated otherwise, all figures are rounded to millions of Euro (€ million). For technical reasons, tables and references may contain rounded figures that differ from the exact mathematical values.
LEG Immo has prepared its consolidated interim financial statements in accordance with the provisions of the International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) for interim reporting, as endorsed in the EU, and their interpretation by the International Financial Reporting Interpretations Committee (IFRIC). The notes have been presented in condensed form in accordance with the option under IAS 34.10. The condensed consolidated interim financial statements have neither been audited nor reviewed by an auditor.
The LEG Group primarily generates income from the rental and letting of investment property. Rental and letting is largely unaffected by seasonal and economic influences.
The accounting policies applied in the consolidated interim financial statements of the LEG Group are the same as those presented in the IFRS consolidated financial statements of LEG Immo as of 31st December 2012. These consolidated interim financial statements as of 31st March 2013 should therefore be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements as of 31st December 2012.
The LEG Group applied the new standards and interpretations effective from 1st January 2013 in full.
The fair values of investment property and derivative financial instruments were calculated in line with the definition of IFRS 13. IFRS 13.9 defines fair value as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. Fair value measurement of investment property is assigned to level 3 of the measurement hierarchy of IFRS 13.86 (measurement based on unobservable input factors). Please see the comments in the consolidated financial statements for information on the measurement of investment property. Please see note 9 for details of the effects of the first-time adoption of IFRS 13 for derivative financial instruments.
The fair value hierarchy can be summarised as follows:
| FA IR -V AL RA RC HY UE -H IE |
|||
|---|---|---|---|
| l 1 Le ve |
l 2 Le ve |
l 3 Le ve |
|
| Inv tm t p rty es en ro pe |
X | ||
| l li ab ilit Fin cia ies an |
X | ||
| Ot he r l iab ilit (p lar y d s) ies icu iva art te er |
X |
There were no changes in the Group in the interim reporting period.
The preparation of IFRS interim consolidated financial statements requires assumptions and estimates affecting the carrying amounts of the assets and liabilities recognised, income and expenses and the disclosure of contingent liabilities. In particular, these assumptions and estimates relate to the measurement of investment property, the recognition and measurement of provisions for pensions, the recognition and measurement of other provisions, the measurement of financial liabilities and the recognition of deferred tax assets.
Although the management believes the assumptions and estimates to be appropriate, unforeseeable changes to these assumptions can influence the Group's net assets, financial position and results of operations.
For further information please see the consolidated financial statements as of 31st December 2012.
As of 31st March 2013, the LEG Group had a portfolio of 90,921 residential units and 996 commercial units.
Investment property developed as follows in the 2012 financial year and in 2013 up to the date of the consolidated interim financial statements:
| IN VE ST M EN T PR O PE RT Y |
||
|---|---|---|
| illi € m on |
31 .0 3.2 01 3 |
31 .12 .20 12 |
| Ca yi f 1 Ja nt st rr ng a m ou a s o nu ar y |
4, 93 7.1 |
4, 73 6.1 |
| Ac isit ion qu s |
3.1 | 52 .5 |
| Ot he dd itio r a ns |
7.0 | 41 .4 |
| Re cla ssi fie d t he ld fo ale ts o a sse r s |
-4 .0 |
-1 3.1 |
| cla fie d t lan nd Re ssi uip rty t a t o p ro pe , p eq m en |
0. 0 |
-0 .3 |
| cla fie d f pla d e Re ssi ipm ert nt t ro m pr op y, an qu en |
- | 0.1 |
| alu dju Fa ir v stm t e a en |
0. 0 |
12 0.3 |
| Ca yi f 3 1s t M ch /3 1s t D be nt rr ng a m ou a s o ar ec em r |
4, 94 3. 2 |
4, 93 7.1 |
The reclassification of assets held for sale essentially relates to a block sale in Bergheim and individual sales from the residential portfolio.
The investment property valuation was not updated in the interim reporting period. Please see the consolidated financial statements as of 31st December 2012 for details of the measurement methods and parameters.
The LEG Group's portfolio also includes land and buildings accounted for in accordance with IAS 16.
The cash and cash equivalents essentially include bank balances.
The changes in the components of consolidated equity can be seen in the statement of changes in consolidated equity.
Financial liabilities are composed as follows:
| FIN AN CI AL L IA BI LIT IES |
||
|---|---|---|
| illi € m on |
31 .0 3.2 01 3 |
31 .12 .20 12 |
| l li ab ilit fr al e f Fin cia ies ina ing tat an om re es nc |
2, 46 2.8 |
2, 47 3.7 |
| l li ab ilit fr le e f Fin cia ies ina ing an om as nc |
25 .3 |
26 .0 |
| Fin cia l l ia bi lit ie an s |
2, 48 8.1 |
2, 49 9. 7 |
Financial liabilities from property financing result from the financing of investment property.
In the first three months in 2013, there was refinancing with a total volume of €200.6 million at LEG NRW GmbH, LEG Wohnen GmbH and GeWo Gesellschaft für Wohnungs- und Städtebau mbH. This led to a reduction in the number of loans.
Other loans extended in the amount of €33.8 million and non-cash valuation effects resulted in increased financial liabilities. As an opposing effect, the reduction in total financial liabilities was due to scheduled and extraordinary repayments on existing debt.
| M AT UR IT Y O F F IN |
AN CI AL L IA BI LIT IES F RO |
M R EA L E ST AT E F IN AN CI |
NG | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| illi € m on |
Re ain ing te m rm of le th hr 1 Ja ss an |
Re ain ing te m rm be nd 1 a 5 tw ee n ye ar |
Re ain ing te m rm ha ah 5 J e t m or n re |
l To ta |
| 31 .03 .20 13 |
18 2.1 |
97 9.9 |
1, 30 0.8 |
46 2, 2. 8 |
| 31 .12 .20 12 |
39 3.2 |
78 4.6 |
1,2 95 .9 |
2, 47 3. 7 |
The main changes in financial liabilities with a remaining term of less than one year in comparison to the financial statements as of 31st December 2012 result from the repayment of loan liabilities through the re financing program. These were already classified as current liabilities as of 31st December 2012. The change in the capital structure as a result of refinancing led to an increase in the long-term financial liabilities.
The LEG Group uses derivative financial instruments to hedge interest rate risks from property financing. Freestanding derivative financial instruments are recognised at fair value through profit or loss. Deriva tives used in hedge accounting are recognised pro rata for the designated portion of the hedge in other comprehensive income and in profit or loss for the undesignated portion including accrued interest.
Rental and lease income are broken down as follows:
| RE NT AL A ND L EA SE IN CO M E |
||
|---|---|---|
| illi € m on |
01 .01 .-3 1.0 3.2 01 3 |
01 .01 .-3 1.0 3.2 01 2 |
| al Re inc nt om e |
13 1.3 |
12 5.2 |
| he Ot r i nc om e |
0. 2 |
0.1 |
| Re al nd le in nt a as e co m e |
13 1.5 |
12 5. 3 |
| Pu rch ed ice as se rv s |
-4 6.5 |
-4 4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| On ing ain te go m na nc e |
-1 2.2 |
-7 .1 |
| St aff sts co |
-9 .8 |
-7 .7 |
| De iat ion d a tis ion at pr ec an m or |
-1 .1 |
-1 .1 |
| he Ot ing rat r o pe ex pe ns es |
-4 .5 |
-6 .4 |
| bu f I by sh ho lde Re im PO t o sts rse m en co are rs |
2.1 | 0. 0 |
| Co f s al in tio ith al d lea in st nt o es co nn ec n w re an se co m e |
-7 2. 0 |
-6 7.0 |
| l a nd le Ne in t r ta en as e co m e |
59 .5 |
58 .3 |
The rise in rental income in the first quarter of 2013 in comparison to the first quarter of 2012 results in part from an increase in net cold rent and a decline in the vacancy rate.
Following the company's successful IPO, performance bonuses of €4.7 million were granted to employees. The share of these staff costs allocated to the cost of sales of rental and letting was €2.1 million and was charged in full to the shareholders Saturea B.V. and Perry Luxco RE.
| NE T IN CO M E F RO M T HE D IS PO SA L Y |
||
|---|---|---|
| O F I NV ES TM EN T PR O PE RT |
||
| illi € m on |
01 .01 .-3 1.0 3.2 01 3 |
01 .01 .-3 1.0 3.2 01 2 |
| e f th e d al of Inc isp in stm t p rty om ro m os ve en ro pe |
1.8 | 2. 6 |
| Ca ing of in ld nt stm t p rty rry am ou ve en ro pe so |
-1 .7 |
-3 .0 |
| Ga in (+ )/ lo (- ) o th e d isp al f i te t ss n os o nv es m en |
||
| ty pr op er |
0. 1 |
-0 .4 |
| illi € m on |
01 .01 .-3 1.0 3.2 01 3 |
01 .01 .-3 1.0 3.2 01 2 |
| aff St sts co |
-0 .3 |
-0 .1 |
| he Ot ing rat r o pe ex pe ns es |
0. 0 |
-0 .1 |
| rch ed Pu ice as se rv s |
- | 0. 0 |
| Co f s al in tio ith in st st t o es co nn ec n w ve m en ld ty pr op er so |
-0 .3 |
-0 .2 |
| e f th e d al f i Ne t i isp tm t nc om ro m os o nv es en |
||
| ty pr op er |
-0 .2 |
-0 .6 |
| AD M IN IST RA TI VE A ND O TH ER EX PE NS ES |
||
|---|---|---|
| illi € m on |
0. 01 .-3 1.0 3.2 01 3 |
01 .01 .-3 1.0 3.2 01 2 |
| he Ot ing rat r o pe ex pe ns es |
-1 0.4 |
-2 .4 |
| St aff sts co |
-8 .4 |
-4 .5 |
| rch ed Pu ice as se rv s |
-0 .3 |
-0 .3 |
| d a De iat ion tis ion at pr ec an m or |
-0 .5 |
-0 .5 |
| Re bu f I PO by sh ho lde im t o sts rse m en co are rs |
8. 2 |
0. 0 |
| Ad in ist tiv nd th m ra e a o er ex pe ns es |
-1 1.4 |
-7 .7 |
The increase in other operating expenses primarily results from the preparations for the company's IPO. In particular, higher consulting costs were incurred compared to the same quarter of the previous year. Following the successful IPO, performance bonuses of €4.7 million were granted to employees, €2.5 million of which to administrative employees. The share of consulting and non-staff operating costs caused directly by the IPO amounting to €5.7 million and the employee performance bonuses of €4.7 million were fully passed on to the shareholders Saturea B.V. and Perry Luxco RE.
| NE T IN TE RE ST IN CO M E |
||
|---|---|---|
| illi € m on |
01 .01 .-3 1.0 3.2 01 3 |
01 .01 .-3 1.0 3.2 01 2 |
| e f ba nk b ala Int t i er es nc om ro m nc es |
0. 2 |
0. 3 |
| he Ot r i t i nt er es nc om e |
0. 0 |
0.1 |
| in In te st re co m e |
0. 2 |
0. 4 |
| IN TE RE ST EX PE NS ES |
||
|---|---|---|
| € illi m on |
01 .01 .-3 1.0 3.2 01 3 |
01 .01 .-3 1.0 3.2 01 2 |
| s f fin f r l e Int cin t e sta te er es xp en se ro m an g o ea |
-1 8.8 |
-2 0.0 |
| s f loa Int tis ion t e at er es xp en se ro m n a m or |
-1 0.2 |
-1 0.8 |
| Pr alt ies t p ep ay m en en |
0. 0 |
-1 .1 |
| fr d s f Int in iva t e te t r ate te er es xp en se om res er or |
||
| l e fin cin sta te rea an g |
-4 .0 |
-2 .2 |
| s f ch Int s i sio vis ion t e er es xp en se ro m an ge n p en n p ro s |
-1 .0 |
-1 .1 |
| s f din f o th Int t e er es xp en se ro m co m po un g o er |
||
| d lia bil itie ts as se an s |
-0 .6 |
-0 .1 |
| Int s f lea fi ing t e er es xp en se ro m se na nc |
-0 .4 |
-0 .4 |
| he Ot r i nt t e er es xp en se s |
-0 .1 |
-0 .4 |
| In te st re ex pe ns e |
-3 5.1 |
-3 6.1 |
The decline in interest expenses from property financing is due to the refinancing transactions in the interim reporting period. The prepayment penalties for refinancing in the first quarter of 2013 were already taken into account in the 2012 annual financial statement. The increase in interest expenses from interest rate derivatives results from the conclusion of new interest derivatives in 2013.
| IN CO M E T AX ES |
||
|---|---|---|
| illi € m on |
01 .01 .-3 1.0 3.2 01 3 |
01 .01 .-3 1.0 3.2 01 2 |
| in nt e t cu rre co m ax es |
0. 2 |
1.6 |
| De fe d t rre ax es |
-0 .8 |
-0 .4 |
| In e t co m ax es |
-0 .6 |
1. 2 |
The change in deferred taxes in the first quarter of 2013 compared to the first quarter of 2012 essentially results from the application of different effective Group tax rates. As of 31st March2013, an effective Group tax rate of 21.3 per cent (previous year: 2.1 per cent) was assumed for 2013 Group tax planning.
The actual effective Group tax rate of 31st December 2012 of 2.1 per cent was used to calculate income taxes for the first quarter of 2012. The deferred taxes for the first quarter of 2013 of €1.7 million also include changes in profit or loss on deferred tax assets on tax loss carryforwards in comparison to 31st December 2012. As of 31st March 2013, deferred tax assets of €25.7 million were recognised in other comprehensive income due to the measurement outside profit and loss of derivative financial instruments and pension provisions (31st December 2012: €28.2 million).
Group segment reporting for the period from 1st January to 31st March 2013
| SE GM EN T RE PO RT IN G 01 .01 .-3 1.0 3. 20 13 |
|||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| € illi m on |
H sin ou g |
O th er |
Re ila tio co nc n |
G ro up |
|
| al d lea Re in nt an se co m e |
12 9.8 |
1.7 | 0. 0 |
13 1.5 |
|
| Co of les of al d lea st nt sa re an se |
-7 1.7 |
0. 0 |
-0 .3 |
-7 2.0 |
|
| Ne l a nd le in t r ta en as e co m e |
58 .1 |
1. 7 |
-0 .3 |
59 .5 |
|
| e f th e d als of Ne t i isp nc om ro m os inv tm t p rty es en ro pe |
-0 .1 |
-0 .1 |
0. 0 |
-0 .2 |
|
| e f th f Ne t i t o nc om ro m e r em ea su re m en inv tm t p rty es en ro pe |
0. 0 |
0. 0 |
0. 0 |
0. 0 |
|
| e f th e d al of l e Ne t i isp inv sta te nc om ro m os rea |
0. 0 to en ry |
-0 .9 |
0. 0 |
-0 .9 |
|
| Ne e f he t i vic ot nc om ro m r s er es |
0.1 | 9. 8 |
-9 .1 |
0. 8 |
|
| Ad ini ive d o th str at m an er ex pe ns es |
-6 .0 |
-1 3.9 |
8. 5 |
-1 1.4 |
|
| he Ot r i nc om e |
0. 6 |
0. 0 |
0. 0 |
0. 6 |
|
| Se ni t e gm en ar ng s |
52 .7 |
-3 .4 |
-0 .9 |
48 .4 |
|
| St f f ina ial iti it at t o em en nc p os on em |
|||||
| (IA 0) Se S 4 t a ts gm en sse |
4, 86 7.3 |
75 .9 |
0. 0 |
4, 94 3. 2 |
|
| y f Ke igu re s |
|||||
| Re ab le a i nt are n s qm |
5, 84 1,4 78 |
76 3, 8 |
46 5, 84 5,2 |
||
| of f r d o tin iod as en ep or g p er |
28 .6 |
0. 0 |
28 .6 |
||
| by sid l u Va tia nit s i n % ate ca nc y r re en |
3. 2 |
3. 2 |
3. 2 |
| SE GM EN PO IN G T RE RT 01 .01 .-3 1.0 3. 20 12 |
|||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| illi € m on |
H sin ou g |
O th er |
Re ila tio co nc n |
G ro up |
|
| Re al d lea in nt an se co m e |
12 4.1 |
1.5 | -0 .3 |
12 5.3 |
|
| of les of al d lea Co st nt sa re an se |
-6 7.2 |
0. 3 |
-0 .1 |
-6 7.0 |
|
| l a nd le in Ne t r ta en as e co m e |
56 .9 |
1. 8 |
-0 .4 |
58 .3 |
|
| Ne t i e f th e d isp als of nc om ro m os inv tm t p rty es en ro pe |
-0 .5 |
-0 .1 |
0. 0 |
.6 -0 |
|
| Ne t i e f th f t o nc om ro m e r em ea su re m en inv tm t p rty es en ro pe |
0. 0 |
0. 0 |
0. 0 |
0. 0 |
|
| e f of Ne t i th e d isp al l e inv sta te to nc om ro m os rea en ry |
-0 .2 |
0. 8 |
0. 0 |
-1 .0 |
|
| e f he Ne t i vic ot nc om ro m r s er es |
1.7 | 8. 4 |
-9 .4 |
0. 7 |
|
| Ad d o th ini ive str at m an er ex pe ns es |
-9 .0 |
-5 .2 |
6. 5 |
-7 .7 |
|
| Ot he r i nc om e |
0. 6 |
0.1 | 0. 0 |
0. 7 |
|
| Se ni t e gm en ar ng s |
49 .5 |
4. 2 |
-3 .3 |
50 .4 |
|
| f f ial St ina iti it at t o em en nc p os on em |
|||||
| Se (IA S 4 0) t a ts gm en sse |
66 4, 3. 2 |
76 .5 |
.6 -0 |
4, 73 9.1 |
|
| y f Ke igu re s |
|||||
| ab le Re a i nt are n s qm |
5, 77 9,6 88 |
3, 89 8 |
5, 78 3,5 86 |
||
| of d o f r iod tin as en ep or g p er |
27 .8 |
0. 0 |
27 .8 |
||
| Va by sid tia l u nit s i n % ate ca nc y r re en |
4.1 | 4.1 | 4.1 |
Group segment reporting for the period from 1st January to 31st March 2012
The following table shows the financial assets and liabilities broken down by measurement category and classes. Receivables and liabilities from finance leases and derivatives used as hedging instruments are included even though they are not assigned to an IAS 39 measurement category. With respect to reconciliation, non-financial assets and non-financial assets are also included although they are not covered by IFRS 7.
The fair values of financial instruments are determined on the basis of corresponding market values or measurement methods. For cash and cash equivalents and other short-term primary financial instruments, the fair value is approximately the same as the carrying amount at the end of the respective reporting period.
For non-current receivables, other assets and liabilities, the fair value is calculated on the basis of the forecast cash flows, applying the reference interest rates at the end of the reporting period. The fair values of derivative financial instruments are calculated using the reference interest rates at the end of the reporting period. For financial instruments at fair value, the discounted cash flow method is generally used to determine fair value using corresponding quoted market prices, with individual credit ratings and other market conditions being taken into account in the form of standard credit and liquidity spreads when calculating present value. If no quoted market prices are available, the fair value is calculated using standard measurement methods applying instrument-specific market parameters.
When calculating the fair value of derivative financial instruments, the input parameters for the valuation models are the relevant market prices and interest rates observed at the end of the reporting period, which are obtained from recognised external sources. Accordingly, derivatives are assigned to level 2 of the fair value hierarchy set out in IFRS 7.27A (measurement on the basis of observable input data).
For the first time as of 31st March 2013, both the Group's own risk and the counterparty risk were taken into account in the calculation of the fair value of derivatives as of 31st March 2013 according to IFRS 13.
| CL AS SE S O F F IN AN CI AL IN ST RU M EN TS FIN AN CI AL A SS ET S A ND L IA BI LIT IES 3 |
FO R 1.0 3. 20 13 |
||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| M io . € |
M t re m ea su en (IA S 3 9) |
M ea |
t re m su en (IA S 1 7) |
||
| Fa | ir lue va |
||||
| Ca ing nt rry am ou |
th h ro ug |
||||
| st at t as p er em en |
ed A tis m or |
of it pr |
lue Fa ir va |
||
| 31 .0 3.2 01 3 |
st co |
lo or ss |
31 .0 3.2 01 3 |
||
| As ts se |
|||||
| Ot he r f ina ial in str ts nc um en |
5. 0 |
5. 0 |
|||
| La R |
0.1 | 0.1 | 0. 0 |
0.1 | |
| Af S |
4. 9 |
4. 9 |
4. 9 |
||
| Re ble nd he iva ot et ce s a r a ss s |
55 .2 |
55 .2 |
|||
| La R |
52 .7 |
52 .7 |
52 .7 |
||
| he -fi ial Ot ts r n on na nc as se |
2. 5 |
2. 5 |
|||
| Ca sh d c h e len iva ts an as qu |
12 0.2 |
12 0.2 |
|||
| La R |
12 0.2 |
12 0.2 |
12 0.2 |
||
| To l ta |
18 0. 4 |
17 7.9 |
0. 0 |
18 0. 4 |
|
| Of hic h I AS 3 9 m t c at w ea su re m en eg or |
ies | ||||
| La R |
17 3.0 |
17 3.0 |
17 3.0 |
||
| Af S |
4. 9 |
4. 9 |
4. 9 |
||
| nd li ab ili Eq ui tie ty a s |
|||||
| l li ab ilit Fin cia ies an |
-2 ,4 88 .1 |
,6 56 -2 .5 |
|||
| FL AC |
-2 ,4 62 .8 |
-2 ,4 62 .8 |
-2 ,6 31 .0 |
||
| bil s f lea fin Lia itie cin ro m se an g |
-2 5.3 |
-2 5.3 |
-2 5.5 |
||
| Ot he r l iab ilit ies |
-1 89 .8 |
-1 89 .8 |
|||
| FL AC |
6.7 -2 |
6.7 -2 |
6.7 -2 |
||
| De riv s H FT ate |
-3 .0 |
-3 .0 |
-3 .0 |
||
| dg d He ing iva nt te e a cc ou er s |
-7 4.2 |
0. 0 |
0. 0 |
-7 4.2 |
|
| Ot he -fi ial lia bil itie r n on na nc s |
-8 5.9 |
-8 5.9 |
|||
| To l ta |
-2 ,6 .9 77 |
-2 ,4 89 .5 |
-3 .0 |
-2 3 5. |
-2 ,8 46 .3 |
| Of hic h I AS 3 9 m t c at w ea su re m en eg or |
ies | ||||
| AC FL |
-2 ,4 89 .5 |
-2 ,4 89 .5 |
-2 ,6 57 .7 |
||
| De riv H FT ate |
-3 .0 |
-3 .0 |
-3 .0 |
LaR = Loans and receivables
FLAC = Financial liabilities at cost
HFT = Held for trading AfS = Available for sale FAHT = Financial assets held for trading
FLHFT = Financial liabilities held for trading
| M io . € |
M t ea su re m en (IA 9) S 3 |
M ea su |
t re m en (IA 7) S 1 |
||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| lue Fa ir Va |
|||||
| Ca ing nt rry am ou |
th h ro ug |
||||
| st at t as p er em en |
A tis ed m or |
of it pr |
Fa ir lue va |
||
| As | 31 .12 .20 12 |
st co |
lo or ss |
31 .12 .20 12 |
|
| ts se he r f ial Ot ina in str ts |
4. 9 |
4. 9 |
|||
| nc um en La R |
0.1 | 0.1 | 0. 0 |
0.1 | |
| Af S |
8 4. |
8 4. |
8 4. |
||
| ble nd he Re iva |
33 .2 |
33 .2 |
|||
| ot et ce s a r a ss s |
|||||
| La R Ot he -fi ial ts |
31 .7 1.5 |
31 .7 |
31 .7 1.5 |
||
| r n on na nc as se Ca sh d c h e iva len |
13 3.7 |
13 3.7 |
|||
| ts an as qu |
|||||
| La R |
13 3.7 |
13 3.7 |
13 3.7 |
||
| l To ta Of hic h I AS 3 |
17 1.8 ies |
17 0. 3 |
0. 0 |
17 1.8 |
|
| 9 m t c at ea su re m en w |
eg or |
||||
| La R |
16 5.5 |
16 5.5 |
16 5.5 |
||
| Af S |
4. 8 |
4. 8 |
4. 8 |
||
| Eq ui nd li ab ili tie ty a s |
|||||
| Fin cia l li ab ilit ies an |
-2 ,4 99 .7 |
-2 ,6 78 .8 |
|||
| FL AC |
-2 ,47 3.7 |
-2 ,47 3.7 |
-2 ,6 53 .5 |
||
| bil s f lea fin Lia itie cin ro m se an g |
6.0 -2 |
6.0 -2 |
-2 5.3 |
||
| Ot he r l iab ilit ies |
-2 26 .7 |
-2 26 ,7 |
|||
| FL AC |
-7 6.8 |
-7 6.8 |
-7 6.8 |
||
| De riv s H FT ate |
-5 .6 |
-5 .6 |
-5 .6 |
||
| He dg ing d iva nt te e a cc ou er s |
-8 4.1 |
0. 0 |
0. 0 |
-8 4.1 |
|
| he -fi ial lia bil Ot itie r n on na nc s |
-6 0.2 |
-6 0.2 |
|||
| l To ta |
-2 ,7 26 .4 |
-2 ,5 50 .5 |
-5 .6 |
-2 6. 0 |
-2 ,9 05 .5 |
| Of hic h I AS 3 9 m t c at w ea su re m en |
ies eg or |
||||
| FL AC |
-2 50 ,5 .5 |
-2 50 ,5 .5 |
-2 ,73 0.3 |
||
| De riv H FT ate |
-5 .6 |
-5 .6 |
-5 .6 |
LaR = Loans and receivables
FLAC = Financial liabilities at cost
HFT = Held for trading AfS = Available for sale FAHT = Financial assets held for trading
FLHFT = Financial liabilities held for trading
Since singing an agreement on 17th January 2013, the shareholders Restio B.V. and Perry Luxco S.à r.l. contributed loan receivables totalling €40.5 million to the capital reserves of LEG Immobilien AG.
Some members of the Management Board of LEG Immo have concluded bilateral agreements with the former shareholders of Saturea B.V. and Perry Luxco RE (see note I.7 in the IFRS consolidated financial statements as of 31st December 2012 for details of these agreements).
As part of LEG Immo's IPO, the previous long-term incentive agreements for members of management were dissolved and replaced by new agreements for the Management Board. Such an agreement was
also concluded with a new member of the Management Board who was not a beneficiary of the old agreements. The new agreements provide for shares in the holding company to be granted by the former shareholders to the members of the Management Board if the IPO results in a certain level of proceeds (less certain costs). The number of shares granted is determined with the aid of an established formula (partly dependent on the IPO price, IPO costs and an individual factor). Under this arrangement, the members of the Management Board are granted a third of their shares 12, 24 and 36 months after a successful IPO. In the event of the early departure of the beneficiary, the outstanding shares lapse by between 20 to 100 per cent depending on the reason for departure. The replacement of the old agreements by the new agreements is accounted for as a modification of existing agreements in accordance with IFRS 2.28 f. This requires that the old commitment is accounted for as before, and any incremental fair value arising from the new commitment is also recognised as an expense from the modification date.
The incremental fair value is defined as the difference between the fair value of the original programme and the fair value of the new programme, each calculated as of the date of modification. Owing to the design of the old and new programmes, there was a positive difference as of the date of modification, with the result that the modification of the old agreements resulted in the recognition of an additional expense of €1.1 million in total. The benefit granted for the new member of the Management Board was determined as of the grant date in line with the regulations of IFRS 2.10 et seq., and amounted to €0.2 million.
As a result of the successful IPO of LEG Immo, overall claims arose from the new agreements between the former shareholders and the Management Board as per 31st March 2013. The cost of these agreements is and does not impact liquidity at LEG Immo. Similarly, the regulations of IFRS 2 result in the different recognition of expenses at LEG Immo, in terms of both timing and amount.
According to the regulations of IFRS 2, €124 thousand of this was recognised as an expense at LEG as of 31st March 2013.
In January 2013, the former shareholders also entered into settlement agreements for consultancy agreements, or, as the case may be, incentive agreements with selected members of the Supervisory Board, or, as the case may be, with the company whose majority shareholder is a member of the Supervisory Board. These consultant agreements, or, as the case may be, incentive agreements provided for payments or the granting of shares by the former shareholders in case of a successful IPO. The agreements were recognised in accordance with the regulations on equity-settled share-based payment (see IFRS 2.43A et seq.). The benefit granted amounted to €3.4 million as of the grant date. In one case the agreements provide for immediate vesting in the event of an IPO, in another case for graded vesting of claims by 1st December 2013 or 1st December 2014. As of 31st March 2013, the agreements amount to total costs of €0.8 million in the LEG Immo financials.
The new employment agreements for members of the Management Board also provide for a long-term incentive programme to be offered for each financial year. The programme is designed for a four-year period and divided into three performance period (until the end of the first, second and third financial year following the relevant financial year). The amount of LTI remuneration is dependent on the achievement of certain performance targets. The performance targets in question are total shareholder return and the development of LEG's share price compared to the relevant EPRA Germany Index. If a Management Board member's appointment ends under certain conditions, tranches pending as of the date of the legal end of the appointment (tranches for which the performance period has not yet ended) expire without substitution. The programme is treated as cash-settled share-based remuneration in accordance with IFRS 2. On the basis of an assessment of the Management Board on the attainment of performance hurdles, staff costs of €66 thousand were recognised as of 31st March 2013.
Furthermore, a performance bonus was agreed between individual LEG companies and their managing directors for the successful IPO. Staff costs of €0.9 million were recognised for this as of 31st March 2013. The additional staff costs were passed on as part of the cost reimbursement by the former shareholders. There will be no reductions in liquidity or earnings at the level of LEG Immo. Beyond this, there were no significant changes in related parties in comparison to 31st December 2012.
The composition of the Management Board and the Supervisory Board as of 31st March 2013 did not change as of the information provided by the Annual Report 2012.
After the interim balance sheet date 31st March 2013, further refinancing loan tranches were utilised in the amount of €21.6million at individual Group companies.
May 2013 saw the signing of the remaining loan in the refinancing program in the amount of €72.5 million. The loan agreement was concluded with a German Pfandbriefbank and has a ten year term.
LEG Erste Grundstücksverwaltungs GmbH, Dusseldorf, was formed by way of entry in the commercial register on 12th May 2013.
The acquisition of a property portfolio of around 2,200 residential units was notarised on 15th May 2013. The portfolio generates annual net rent of approx. €6.1 million. The portfolio is primarily concentrated in stable markets and has good synergies with LEG's existing portfolio. Average in-place rents amount to €4.74 per square metre, the initial vacancy rate is 8 per cent and the initial FFO return is in line with LEG's return expectations for acquisitions. Closing for the transaction is expect ed for 1st August 2013. The acquisition price is subject to a non-disclosure agreement.
Dusseldorf, 28th May 2013
LEG Immobilien AG Legal representatives of the company
Thomas Hegel, Erftstadt (CEO)
Holger Hentschel, Erkrath (COO)
Eckhard Schultz, Neuss (CFO)
| ST AT EM EN T O F C HA NG ES IN C O NS O LI DA TE D EQ UI TY |
|||
|---|---|---|---|
| € illi m on |
|||
| Sh ar e |
Ca pit al |
Re ve nu e |
|
| f 1 st |
Ca al pit |
re se rv es |
re se rv es |
| As Ja 20 12 o nu ar y, fit fo he iod |
0. 0 |
54 4. 3 |
1, 24 6.1 |
| Ne t p r t ro p er Ot he eh siv e i |
- | - | 14 .8 |
| r c om pr en nc om e To l c eh siv e i ta om en nc om e |
- | - | - 14 .8 |
| pr Ch oli da d c in nie te an co ns om s |
- | - | |
| ge pa al Ca pit inc rea se |
- - |
- - |
- - |
| W ith dr als fr aw om re se rv es |
- | - | - |
| ibu Di tio str ns |
- | - | - |
| f 3 t M ch As 1s 2 01 2 o ar |
0. 0 |
54 4. 3 |
1, 26 0. 9 |
| As f 1 st Ja 20 13 o nu ar y |
53 .0 |
43 6.1 |
1, 65 3. 4 |
| fit fo he iod Ne t p r t ro p er |
- | - | 11 .0 |
| Ot he eh siv e i r c om pr en nc om e |
- | - | - |
| To l c eh siv e i ta om pr nc om en e |
- | - | 11 .0 |
| Ch oli da d c s/ rib of llin in nie ion g i te nt ut nt nt sts an ge co ns om pa co no n- co ro ere |
- | - | - |
| al Ca pit inc rea se |
41 .5 |
- | |
| W ith dr als fr aw om re se rv es |
- | - | - |
| Di ibu tio str ns |
- | - | - |
| f 3 ch As 1s t M 2 01 3 o ar |
53 .0 |
47 7.6 |
1, 66 4. 4 |
| Cu ula tiv th m e o er re se rv es |
||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ial Ac tu ar ins d los s f ga an se ro m th t e m ea su re m en of bl sio iga tio p en n o ns |
lue Fa ir va ad ju f st t o m en in de riv te st at re es h ed in ge s |
Eq uit y ib ab le at tr ut to sh eh ol de ar rs of th e g ro up |
N on llin nt g co ro in te sts re |
Co ol ida d te ns uit eq y |
| -4 .2 |
-1 3 5. |
1, 0. 9 77 |
37 0 5. |
2, 14 9 5. |
| - | - | 14 .8 |
2. 3 |
17 .1 |
| -0 .1 |
-6 .0 |
-6 .1 |
-1 .2 |
-7 .3 |
| -0 .1 |
-6 .0 |
8. 7 |
1.1 | 9. 8 |
| - | - | - | 0. 0 |
0. 0 |
| - | - | - | 0.1 | 0.1 |
| - | - | - | 0. 0 |
0. 0 |
| - | - | - | - | - |
| -4 .3 |
-2 1.3 |
1, 77 9. 6 |
37 6. 2 |
2, 15 5. 8 |
| -2 2. 3 |
6 -5 9. |
06 0. 6 2, |
24 .9 |
08 2, 5. 5 |
| - | - | 11 .0 |
0. 3 |
11 .3 |
| - | 8. 6 |
8. 6 |
0. 0 |
8. 6 |
| - | 6 8. |
.6 19 |
0. 3 |
19 .9 |
| - | - | - | - | - |
| - | - | 41 .5 |
0. 5 |
42 .0 |
| - | - | - | -0 .1 |
-0 .1 |
| - | - | - | - | - |
| -2 2. 3 |
-5 1.0 |
2, 12 1.7 |
25 .6 |
2, 14 7.3 |
To the best of our knowledge, and in accordance with the applicable reporting principles for interim financial reporting, the interim consolidated financial statements as of 31st March 2013 give a true and fair view of the assets, liabilities, financial position and profit or loss of the Group, and the interim management report of the Group includes a fair review of the development and performance of the business and the position of the Group, together with a description of the principal opportunities and risks associated with the expected development of the Group for the remaining months of the financial year.
Dusseldorf, 28th May 2013
LEG Immobilien AG The Management Board
(CEO) (CFO) (COO)
Thomas Hegel Eckhard Schultz Holger Hentschel
| FIS CA L Y EA R 20 13 |
|
|---|---|
| Pu bl of he of ch ic io in rim 3 1s t M 2 01 3 at t te rt n re po a s ar |
th 28 M 2 01 3 ay |
| l G al ld f A M tin D nn ua en er ee g, us se or |
th l 19 Ju 20 13 y |
| bl of he of h Pu ic io in rim 3 0t Ju 2 01 3 at t te rt n re po a s ne |
th 30 A 20 13 t ug us |
| h bl of he of Se be Pu ic io in rim 3 0t r 2 01 3 at t te rt pt n re po a s em |
th N be 29 r 2 01 3 ov em |
LEG Immobilien AG Hans-Böckler-Straße 38 40476 Dusseldorf, Germany Tel. 0049 (0) 211 45 68 - 416 Fax 0049 (0) 211 45 68 - 500 [email protected] www. leg-nrw.de
Investor Relations Burkhard Sawazki/Frank Hilbertz Tel. 0049 (0) 211 45 68 - 400 Fax 0049 (0) 211 45 68 - 290 [email protected]
Visual concept and design GornigDesign, Mülheim/Ruhr
The quarterly report as of 31st March 2013 is also available in German.
In case of doubt, the German version takes precedence.
LEG Immobilien AG Hans-Böckler-Straße 38 40476 Düsseldorf, Germany Tel. 0049 (0) 211 45 68-0 Fax 0049 (0) 211 45 68-261 [email protected] www.leg-nrw.de
Building tools?
Free accounts include 100 API calls/year for testing.
Have a question? We'll get back to you promptly.