Quarterly Report • Nov 5, 2013
Quarterly Report
Open in ViewerOpens in native device viewer
| in EUR million | 2013 | 20121 | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1.1.– 30.6. |
1.7.– 30.9. |
+/ – previous year |
1.1.– 30.9. |
+/ – previous year |
1.7.– 30.9. |
1.1.– 30.9. |
31.12. | |
| Results | ||||||||
| Gross written premium | 7,226.7 | 3,311.2 | -2.8% | 10,537.9 | +2.3% | 3,407.5 | 10,296.0 | |
| Net premium earned | 6,191.5 | 2,925.8 | -6.7% | 9,117.3 | +1.8% | 3,134.2 | 8,959.0 | |
| Net underwriting result | (5.5) | (43.2) | (48.7) | (39.7) | (52.9) | |||
| Net investment income | 689.0 | 364.2 | -27.1% | 1,053.2 | -12.9% | 499.3 | 1,208.8 | |
| Operating profit (EBIT) | 670.7 | 291.0 | -30.7% | 961.6 | -5.4% | 419.6 | 1,016.8 | |
| Group net income | 407.7 | 205.5 | -22.6% | 613.2 | -8.6% | 265.5 | 670.8 | |
| Balance sheet | ||||||||
| Policyholders' surplus | 8,467.5 | 8,630.2 | -3.5% | 8,947.2 | ||||
| Equity attributable to shareholders of Hannover Rück SE |
5,595.4 | 5,756.5 | -4.6% | 6,032.5 | ||||
| Non-controlling interests | 636.5 | 636.8 | -6.6% | 681.7 | ||||
| Hybrid capital | 2,235.6 | 2,236.9 | +0.2% | 2,233.0 | ||||
| Investments (excl. funds withheld by ceding companies) |
31,609.8 | 31,824.4 | -0.2% | 31,874.4 | ||||
| Total assets | 55,157.1 | 54,866.3 | +0.1% | 54,811.7 | ||||
| Share | ||||||||
| Earnings per share (basic and diluted) in EUR |
3.38 | 1.70 | -22.6% | 5.08 | -8.6% | 2.20 | 5.56 | |
| Book value per share in EUR | 46.40 | 47.73 | -4.6% | 48.97 | 50.02 | |||
| Share price at the end of the period in EUR |
55.32 | 54.36 | -7.8% | 49.725 | 58.96 | |||
| Market capitalisation at the end of the period |
6,671.4 | 6,555.7 | -7.8% | 5,996.7 | 7,110.4 | |||
| Ratios | ||||||||
| Combined ratio (non-life reinsurance) 2 | 94.4% | 96.3% | 95.0% | 95.8% | 96.5% | |||
| Major losses as percentage of net premium earned (non-life reinsurance) 3 |
7.6% | 11.1% | 8.8% | 3.5% | 3.8% | |||
| Retention | 90.0% | 86.4% | 88.9% | 89.4% | 89.7% | |||
| Return on investment (excl. funds withheld by ceding companies) |
3.2% | 3.6% | 3.3% | 5.3% | 4.3% | |||
| EBIT margin4 | 10.8% | 9.9% | 10.5% | 13.4% | 11.3% | |||
| Return on equity | 14.0% | 14.5% | 13.9% | 18.7% | 16.5% |
1 Adjusted on the basis of IAS 8
2 Incl. funds withheld
3 Hannover Re Group's net share for natural catastrophes and other major losses in excess of EUR 10 million gross as a percentage of net premium earned
4 Operating result (EBIT) / net premium earned
Ulrich Wallin Chairman of the Executive Board
After a very pleasing development on the whole in the first half of the year, our business continued to perform satisfactorily in the third quarter. With Group net income of EUR 613 million for the nine months of the current financial year, we are well on track to achieve our overall target for 2013. The positive performance was again driven in the third quarter by a good underwriting result in non-life reinsurance. Life and health reinsurance showed slightly improved profitability in this quarter too. Although Australian disability business fell short of expectations in the third quarter, the rest of the portfolio continues to deliver good results. While returns on our investments declined as a consequence of the protracted low level of interest rates, investment income was within the bounds of our expectations given the challenging climate.
I would now like to discuss in greater detail developments to date in our two business groups as well as our investment portfolio:
In non-life reinsurance we generated a very good result in the first nine months of the year. Although investment income came in sharply lower as expected on the back of stubbornly low interest rates, substantially improved underwriting results enabled us to improve further on what was already a very good performance in the previous year. The operating profit (EBIT), for example, climbed 5 percent to EUR 805 million; this is equivalent to an EBIT margin of 15.8 percent, which is very comfortably in excess of our strategic target. In view of the increasingly intense competitive pressure in non-life reinsurance, we achieved this result on the basis of our selective underwriting policy – according to which we only write business that satisfies our margin requirements. This was, however, also reflected in slower premium growth, with the increase standing at just 2.8 percent in the first nine months after adjustment for exchange rate effects. The diminished pace of growth can be attributed to our active cycle management, under which we relinquish business that our analyses identify as inadequately priced – even if this leads to contraction of our market shares in certain areas.
We nevertheless remain convinced that we can grow profitably in our non-life reinsurance business group over the medium to long term. Key factors here are our competitive advantage based on our low administrative expenses as well as our long-standing business relationships with our clients. Our excellent ratings from the relevant rating agencies also play an important part. We are thus very well positioned in relation to the available growth opportunities in emerging markets of Asia and Latin America and particularly in speciality lines on mature markets.
Treaties in non-life reinsurance came up for renewal primarily in North America, Australia and New Zealand in the third quarter. All in all, the picture was a mixed one in terms of movements in conditions. The treaty renewals in Australia and New Zealand passed off satisfactorily overall. The same was true of renewals in US business, with the exception of modellable natural catastrophe risks. The latter came under very considerable competitive pressure, which led to rather substantial rate reductions. The principal driver here was "alternative capacity", which refers to the investments made by financial investors either in catastrophe bonds or in other collateralised reinsurance products. However, given that our exposure to US natural catastrophe reinsurance is disproportionately low overall relative to our market shares, the treaty renewals nevertheless passed off satisfactorily for Hannover Re in the third quarter. We were able to slightly enlarge our premium volume.
Turning to the major loss situation in the third quarter, it is true that the hurricane season in North America and the Caribbean was again unremarkable for your company. However, our domestic market recorded an accumulation of natural disasters. The severe flooding in the second quarter was followed by a number of local hailstorms. The total market loss for these natural perils events is put at around EUR 5 billion. Despite the losses incurred by your company – in common with other market players – from these events, the major loss expenditure of EUR 447 million as at 30 September 2013 was within our expectations. Against this backdrop we posted a good combined ratio of 95.0 percent.
In the life and health reinsurance business group we generated currency-adjusted growth in gross premium of 7.4 percent in the first nine months. Although growth was slower owing to reduced premium income in enhanced annuity business from the United Kingdom, we still anticipate attractive growth opportunities in life and health reinsurance. This is especially true of emerging markets in Asia and South America, where we see good growth prospects through the support that we give our customers with regard to product development as well as in the area of automated underwriting on the sales side. In addition, we achieved substantial profitable growth in US mortality business and in the vitally important UK longevity sector in the first nine months. It is our expectation that this trend can be sustained going forward.
The results for our life and health reinsurance business group came in well short of our expectations, however. This was due to the quite substantial losses that we had to absorb from Australian disability business. The bulk of these losses stemmed from the reinsurance of individual disability income insurance (DII) products, the experience of which has continued to deteriorate, hence compelling us to strengthen our reserves. Given that we had already very largely stopped writing this business in 2009, it is gratifying to note that our exposure here is diminishing with each passing year. A smaller portion of the negative results also relates to group covers of Australian superannuation funds. In this case, however, conditions are adjusted in a three-year cycle to reflect the observed claims experience, and we can therefore already expect to restore this business to profitability in the coming years. The net profit of EUR 136 million that we generated despite the considerable strains from Australian disability business is a testament to the fact that our life and health reinsurance portfolio is now able to absorb even such adverse developments. It is pleasing to report that we have already achieved initial successes when it comes to the portfolio management of our US mortality business in the difficult underwriting years prior to 2005. In this way we have reduced the associated strain quite substantially.
Faced with a continued challenging and volatile capital market climate, particularly high importance attaches to preserving the value of assets under own management and the stability of the return. Our portfolio is therefore guided by the principles of a balanced risk/return profile and broad diversification. Based on a risk-averse asset mix, our investments reflect both the currencies and the durations of our liabilities.
Against a backdrop of broadly sustained low interest rates, the yield increases already observed towards the end of the second quarter continued, especially in the area of high-quality government bonds. This was not entirely offset by narrowing credit spreads for securities issued by semi-governmental entities and corporate bonds. Overall, this resulted in partial erosion of the valuation reserves which – in combination with payment of the dividend in the second quarter – also gave rise to a modest reduction in your company's shareholders' equity. The annualised return on equity of 13.9 percent is comfortably in excess of our minimum target of 750 basis points above risk-free. As expected, ordinary investment income as at 30 September 2013 was lower than in the comparable period of the previous year owing to the protracted low level of interest rates. Extraordinary income similarly declined year-on-year. This can be attributed principally to the balance of unrealised gains and losses, but was also due to increased profit-taking in the previous year.
With the results presented as at 30 September 2013 we have put in place a good foundation for achieving our targeted post-tax Group net income in the order of EUR 800 million for 2013. As you are aware, this forecast is always made subject to the proviso that major loss expenditure does not significantly exceed the expected level of around EUR 625 million for the full year and that there are no unforeseen downturns on capital markets.
I would like to thank you – also on behalf of my colleagues on the Executive Board – most sincerely for your trust in Hannover Re. Going forward, as in the past, our paramount concern will be to lead your company responsibly and securely into a profitable future.
Yours sincerely,
Ulrich Wallin Chairman of the Executive Board
| Business development | 5 |
|---|---|
| Non-life reinsurance | 5 |
| Life and health reinsurance | 6 |
| Investments | 7 |
| Risk report | 9 |
| Outlook | 19 |
We are satisfied with the development of our business in the third quarter. Market conditions for our company, as a financially strong reinsurer, remain good. Even though competition is more marked in certain segments and regions, prices in non-life reinsurance are broadly commensurate with the risks. Life and health reinsurance offers us sufficient potential for profitable growth. Both business groups contributed to the good result. The major loss situation in the third quarter was notable for a number of natural catastrophe events, especially in Germany and Canada. The hurricane season in the United States and the Caribbean, on the other hand, has so far passed off without appreciable losses for the (re)insurance industry. All in all, major loss expenditure as at 30 September 2013 was in line with our expectations.
Gross written premium in total business increased by 2.3% as at 30 September 2013 to reach EUR 10.5 billion (previous year: EUR 10.3 billion). At constant exchange rates growth would have amounted to 4.7%. The level of retained premium decreased slightly to 88.9% (89.7%). Net premium climbed 1.8% to EUR 9.1 billion (EUR 9.0 billion). Growth of 4.2% would have been booked for net premium at constant exchange rates.
Our investments developed as anticipated, with the portfolio of assets under own management remaining stable at EUR 31.8 billion (31 December 2012: EUR 31.9 billion). Owing to the sustained low interest rate level, ordinary investment
The round of treaty renewals in non-life reinsurance as at 1 July 2013 saw increased competitive pressure in some segments even relative to the beginning of the year. US property catastrophe business was particularly heavily impacted. The sustained good results posted by primary insurers as well as additional capacities from the market for catastrophe bonds prompted corresponding rate reductions. The rate level was nevertheless still adequate in most cases. The decrease in margins for US catastrophe covers is of limited relevance to our company, however, since our market share in this segment is disproportionately low. Although some parts of other US property business were also more competitive than in previous renewal rounds this year, we were nevertheless broadly satisfied with the development of rates. In private property business the rate increases were sustained on both the primary and reinsurance sides, hence putting this segment well on track to greater profitability. In commercial property business, too, we obtained moderate rate increases. Our premium volume in US property business grew slightly overall and is now at a historic high.
income excluding interest on deposits was as expected lower than in the comparable period at EUR 781.1 million (EUR 822.0 million); the resulting annualised return stood at 3.3% (3.7%). Interest on deposits climbed to EUR 267.6 million (EUR 247.6 million).
The write-downs taken in the period under review were again only very minimal in volume. Given the challenging conditions on capital markets and owing to the elimination of various positive special effects recorded in the previous year, our income from investments under own management fell short of the comparable period: it amounted to EUR 785.6 million (EUR 961.2 million) as at 30 September 2013.
The operating profit (EBIT) as at 30 September 2013 totalling EUR 961.6 million (EUR 1.0 billion) was satisfactory. Group net income was lower than in the comparable period of the previous year, falling by 8.6% to EUR 613.2 million (EUR 670.8 million). Earnings per share came in at EUR 5.08 (EUR 5.56).
The shareholders' equity of Hannover Re contracted to EUR 5.8 billion (31 December 2012: EUR 6.0 billion). The decline was due primarily to the dividend payment and the decrease in hidden reserves owing to movements in market yields. The book value per share amounted to EUR 47.73 (31 December 2012: EUR 50.02). The annualised return on equity reached 13.9% (16.5%).
In casualty business rates improved across all lines on the primary side. This development was not, however, carried over in equal measure to the reinsurance side because clients are carrying more business in their retention on the back of good results.
We are satisfied with the outcome of the treaty renewals as at 1 July 2013 in Australia and New Zealand. The model adjustment made by the catastrophe modelling firm AIR for allied perils that had previously not been adequately factored into the pricing was integrated into the underwriting process and resulted in price mark-ups. In the aftermath of the heavy major losses recorded in 2010 and 2011, the price level last year was thoroughly attractive. Now, however, prices have come under pressure from both new and established market players, and also owing to the extensive absence of losses in the previous year. In natural catastrophe XL business rates declined slightly, although they were still on a level that enabled us to generate technically adequate margins. Casualty lines came under stronger competitive pressure than property lines. We were able to obtain our targeted pricing requirements under most reinsurance programmes. Despite adhering to a selective underwriting policy we successfully enlarged our premium volume.
The gross premium for our non-life reinsurance business group increased by a modest 1.0% relative to the corresponding period of the previous year to reach EUR 6.0 billion (EUR 5.9 billion). At constant exchange rates, especially against the US dollar, growth would have been 2.8%. The level of retained premium retreated only slightly to 89.1% (89.9%). Net premium earned climbed 1.5% to EUR 5.1 billion (EUR 5.0 billion), or 3.3% adjusted for exchange rate effects.
After the second quarter had already seen heavy major losses, the third quarter also brought a number of natural disasters and other large losses. The largest single event, hailstorm "Andreas", stemmed from our domestic market and produced an estimated market loss of at least EUR 2.5 billion. The resulting net strain for Hannover Re is EUR 64.0 million. Total major loss expenditure as at 30 September 2013 stood at EUR 446.7 million. Although this is significantly higher than the figure for the comparable period (EUR 193.0 million), the expenditure is within the bounds of our loss expectancy for the first nine months.
The underwriting result for total non-life reinsurance as at 30 September 2013 climbed to a pleasing EUR 243.4 million (EUR 169.7 million). The combined ratio for the first nine months of the current year was very favourable at 95.0% (96.5%).
The operating profit (EBIT) in non-life reinsurance rose by a pleasing 5.0% to EUR 804.6 million (EUR 766.0 million) as at 30 September 2013. Group net income totalled EUR 534.4 million (EUR 524.8 million), an increase of 1.8%. Earnings per share came in at EUR 4.43 (EUR 4.35).
| in EUR million | 2013 | 2012 | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1.1. –30.6. | 1.7. –30.9. | +/ – previous year |
1.1. –30.9. | +/ – previous year |
1.7. –30.9. | 1.1. –30.9. | |
| Gross written premium | 4,097.1 | 1,859.4 | +2.3% | 5,956.4 | +1.0% | 1,817.3 | 5,897.0 |
| Net premium earned | 3,403.9 | 1,689.3 | -1.4% | 5,093.2 | +1.5% | 1,714.1 | 5,017.5 |
| Underwriting result | 183.6 | 59.9 | -15.1% | 243.4 | +43.4% | 70.5 | 169.7 |
| Net investment income | 363.1 | 214.9 | -26.4% | 578.0 | -17.7% | 292.0 | 702.1 |
| Operating result (EBIT) | 549.1 | 255.5 | -23.9% | 804.6 | +5.0% | 335.7 | 766.0 |
| Group net income | 362.1 | 172.3 | -21.5% | 534.4 | +1.8% | 219.3 | 524.8 |
| Earnings per share in EUR | 3.00 | 1.43 | -21.5% | 4.43 | +1.8% | 1.82 | 4.35 |
| Combined ratio 1 | 94.4% | 96.3% | 95.0% | 95.8% | 96.5% | ||
| EBIT margin2 | 16.1% | 15.1% | 15.8% | 19.6% | 15.3% | ||
| Retention | 90.2% | 86.7% | 89.1% | 89.4% | 89.9% |
1 Including expenses on funds withheld and contract deposits
2 Operating result (EBIT)/net premium earned
The business environment in international life and health reinsurance was essentially unchanged in the third quarter of 2013. Life insurers, in particular, continue to be faced with low asset returns and hence declining investment income. Along with these difficult conditions on the capital markets – where to a limited extent reinsurance can bring financial relief – the life and health reinsurance industry is especially benefiting in emerging markets such as China and India as well as in South America from a rising insurance density among the growing middle class. Furthermore, in mature markets such as the United States, Germany, France or indeed Scandinavia reinsurance solutions designed to optimise a client's capital structure and solvency are increasingly enjoying brisk demand. Life and health reinsurance was adversely impacted by Australian disability business in the quarter just ended. This contrasted with positive effects from US mortality business, although these did not entirely offset the losses. We are nevertheless satisfied with the development of the rest of the life and health reinsurance portfolio.
The increasing demand for financially oriented reinsurance products can be felt worldwide. Our customers are showing strong interest in potential solutions for solvency optimisation as well as assistance with new business financing.
Gross written premium in life and health reinsurance amounted to EUR 4.6 billion (EUR 4.4 billion) as at 30 September 2013, an increase of 4.1% relative to the corresponding period of the previous year or as much as 7.4% at constant exchange rates. The retention retreated slightly to 88.5% (89.3%). Net premium earned grew by 2.1% in the period under review to EUR 4.0 billion (EUR 3.9 billion). At constant exchange rates, net premium would have risen by 5.4%.
The operating profit (EBIT) contracted to EUR 143.4 million (EUR 233.3 million) as at 30 September 2013. The EBIT margin for the reporting categories of Mortality and Morbidity, which at 2.8% fell short of the target mark of 6%, reflects the deterioration in the experience of Australian disability business. The Financial Solutions and Longevity categories beat the targeted 2% mark with an EBIT margin of 4.6%. Group net income came in at EUR 136.0 million (EUR 188.6 million), equivalent to earnings per share of EUR 1.13 (EUR 1.56).
| in EUR million | 2013 | 20121 | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1.1. –30.6. | 1.7. –30.9. | +/ – previous year |
1.1. –30.9. | +/ – previous year |
1.7. –30.9. | 1.1. –30.9. | |
| Gross written premium | 3,129.7 | 1,451.9 | -8.7% | 4,581.6 | +4.1% | 1,590.5 | 4,399.3 |
| Net premium earned | 2,787.3 | 1,236.3 | -12.9% | 4,023.7 | +2.1% | 1,420.1 | 3,941.5 |
| Investment income | 315.6 | 144.9 | -27.8% | 460.5 | -5.5% | 200.8 | 487.2 |
| Operating result (EBIT) | 111.4 | 32.0 | -58.9% | 143.4 | -38.5% | 77.8 | 233.3 |
| Net income after tax | 83.8 | 52.1 | -13.9% | 136.0 | -27.9% | 60.5 | 188.6 |
| Earnings per share in EUR | 0.70 | 0.43 | -13.9% | 1.13 | -27.9% | 0.50 | 1.56 |
| Retention | 89.6% | 86.1% | 88.5% | 89.4% | 89.3% | ||
| EBIT margin2 | 4.0% | 2.6% | 3.6% | 5.5% | 5.9% | ||
1 Adjusted on the basis of IAS 8
2 Operating result (EBIT)/net premium earned
While the yield level on US treasury securities and on German, French and UK government bonds remained broadly unchanged for a long period during the first half of the year, fixed-income securities issued by these countries began to see yield increases – sometimes markedly so – from the middle of June onwards, especially in the medium and longer durations. Although these reduced the unrealised gains in our portfolio of government bonds, they also afforded some relief on the reinvestment side in what continued to be a comparatively low interest rate environment. The picture as regards countries with higher risk premiums – presently the focus of so much attention – was a mixed one: while Spanish bonds continued to recover, Portuguese sovereign bonds recorded increases in yields, above all in the medium duration segment. This could also be observed in part with Irish government bonds. Other durations benefited here, however, from yield declines. Italian treasury bonds remained largely unchanged.
Credit spreads in the area of European and US corporate bonds decreased – in some instances appreciably – across most rating classes. On the one hand this has positive implications for unrealised gains, but it also necessitates greater scrutiny of a balanced risk /return profile when it comes to making new investments. Corporate bonds from emerging markets, however, saw a widening of risk premiums in some areas. In total, the unrealised gains on our fixed-income securities decreased to EUR 912.2 million (EUR 1,714.6 million). Our portfolio of assets under own management remained stable at EUR 31.8 billion (EUR 31.9 billion).
Owing to the sustained low level of interest rates, ordinary investment income excluding interest on deposits was lower than in the corresponding period of the previous year at EUR 781.1 million (EUR 822.0 million); this comparatively moderate decrease can be attributed principally to the enlarged average investment portfolio, although the appreciable expansion of the corporate bonds asset class over the past two years is also a factor here. Interest income on funds withheld and contract deposits increased to EUR 267.6 million (EUR 247.6 million).
Impairments of altogether just EUR 13.7 million (EUR 16.3 million) were taken. This includes impairments of EUR 3.5 million (EUR 5.3 million) on alternative investments; no impairments were recognised on fixed-income securities or equities (EUR 0.3 million and EUR 2.2 million respectively). Scheduled depreciation on directly held real estate rose to EUR 10.1 million (EUR 7.9 million), a reflection of our greater involvement in this area. The write-downs contrasted with write-ups of EUR 0.3 million (EUR 0.9 million).
| in EUR million | 2013 | 2012 | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1.1. –30.6. | 1.7. –30.9. | +/ – previous year |
1.1. –30.9. | +/ – previous year |
1.7. –30.9. | 1.1. –30.9. | |
| Ordinary investment income | 503.6 | 277.5 | -4.3% | 781.1 | -5.0% | 290.0 | 822.0 |
| Result from participations in associated companies |
6.2 | 3.6 | +91.3% | 9.8 | +84.6% | 1.9 | 5.3 |
| Realised gains /losses | 84.5 | 12.9 | -84.4% | 97.4 | -35.3% | 82.6 | 150.5 |
| Appreciation | 0.3 | – | 0.3 | -69.6% | 0.3 | 0.9 | |
| Impairments on investments 1 | 8.4 | 5.2 | +38.0% | 13.7 | -16.4% | 3.8 | 16.3 |
| Unrealised gains /losses 2 | (37.5) | 18.7 | -67.8% | (18.8) | -130.8% | 58.1 | 61.0 |
| Investment expenses | 47.2 | 23.3 | +10.8% | 70.5 | +13.4% | 21.0 | 62.2 |
| Net investment income from assets under own management |
501.4 | 284.1 | -30.4% | 785.6 | -18.3% | 408.0 | 961.2 |
| Net investment income from funds withheld |
187.5 | 80.1 | -12.3% | 267.6 | +8.1% | 91.3 | 247.6 |
| Total investment income | 689.0 | 364.2 | -27.1% | 1,053.2 | -12.9% | 499.3 | 1,208.8 |
1 Including depreciation/impairments on real estate
2 Portfolio at fair value through profit or loss
We recognise a derivative for the credit risk associated with special life reinsurance treaties (ModCo) under which securities deposits are held by cedants for our account; the performance of this derivative in the period under review gave rise to unrealised gains of EUR 5.2 million (EUR 45.8 million) recognised in investment income. The inflation swaps taken out in 2010 to hedge part of the inflation risks associated with the loss reserves in our technical account have produced unrealised losses in the year to date of EUR 27.4 million recognised in investment income, as against unrealised gains of EUR 11.4 million in the previous year. The changes in their fair values are recognised in income as a derivative pursuant to IAS 39. In economic terms we assume a neutral development for these two items over time, and hence the volatility that can occur in specific quarters reveals nothing about the actual business performance. Altogether, the unrealised losses on our assets recognised at fair value through profit or loss amounted to EUR 18.8 million, contrasting with unrealised gains of EUR 61.0 million in the comparable period.
The net balance of gains realised from the sale of securities stood at EUR 97.4 million (EUR 150.5 million); it can be attributed primarily to regrouping within our fixed-income holdings as part of regular portfolio management.
While our net investment income fell short of the previous year owing to the contraction in ordinary income and unrealised gains, and also due to the comparatively low realised gains, and also as a reflection of lower realised gains – we had acted on opportunities in the real estate sector in the comparable period –, it was still pleasing in the face of a capital market climate that remains challenging. It amounted to EUR 785.6 million (EUR 961.2 million) in the period under review, equivalent to an annualised average return (including effects from derivatives) of 3.3% for our portfolio of assets under own management. Excluding the unrealised effects from the ModCo derivatives and our inflation swaps, the annualised figure stands at 3.4% and hence meets our target for the full year.
Our objective is to consolidate and further extend our position as one of the world's leading globally operating reinsurance groups of above-average profitability. With a view to accomplishing this aim we enter into a broad variety of risks which, on the one hand, open up opportunities for profit but, on the other hand, can also have adverse implications for our company. Our goal is to make optimal use of opportunities while at the same time adequately controlling and managing the risks associated with our commercial activities. Through our global orientation and our operations in all lines of reinsurance we achieve extensive risk equalisation. In particular, diversification between our non-life and life and health reinsurance business groups enables us to effectively deploy our capital. As a reinsurance specialist, we also transact primary insurance business in selected niche markets on a complementary basis to our traditional reinsurance activities. Of material significance to all segments are the underwriting results and the investment of the premium payments. The parameters and decisions of the Executive Board with respect to the risk appetite of Hannover Re are fundamental to the acceptance of risks. The risk strategy derived from the corporate strategy constitutes the basis for our handling of opportunities and risks. We act on opportunities only by weighing up the associated risks. The risk strategy and the guidelines derived from it, such as the Framework Guideline on Risk Management and the central system of limits and thresholds, are subject to regular review. In this way, we ensure that our assumptions and hence also our risk management system are kept up-to-date. Operationalisation of our corporate strategy takes place on multiple levels and ultimately leads into guidelines, including for example the underwriting guidelines used by our treaty and regional departments.
Opportunities for Hannover Re are to be anticipated inter alia as a consequence of the impending adoption of risk-based solvency systems, such as Solvency II in Europe. Irrespective of the date of implementation of Solvency II on the European level, risk-based national regulations are already in force and others will likely follow. We have long practised a risk-based and value-based management approach of the type which regulators will call for under Solvency II and we began to make our preparations for the requirements of Solvency II at an early stage. We see Solvency II as an opportunity for the convergence of international regulatory and internal corporate approaches and consider ourselves well-equipped to provide the markets with tailored products. Stronger demand for reinsurance covers can also be expected as a consequence of content-based adjustments to the natural catastrophe simulation models used by our company as well as the vigorous growth recorded in a number of markets. For Hannover Re itself, the minimum capital requirements imposed under Solvency II are unlikely to present an obstacle, since our internal capitalisation targets (confidence level of 99.97%) go well beyond the regulatory requirements (confidence level of 99.5%). Business ideas and opportunities are systematically analysed by our Business Opportunity Management unit with the aim of generating new business and thereby enabling Hannover Re to enjoy continued sustainable growth going forward. This is complemented by initiatives such as our "future radar", a systematic analysis of relevant factors that will drive future success. All activities and decisions are guided not only by profit targets but also increasingly by sustainability considerations. We have defined what we consider to be the most important issues in the context of our sustainability strategy.
There is an interplay between the individual bodies and functions in our risk management system. Their roles and responsibilities are clearly defined.
| Body /function | Key risk management tasks |
|---|---|
| Supervisory Board | • Advising and supervising the Executive Board in its management of the company, inter alia with respect to risk management, on the basis of the Supervisory Board's Rules of Procedure |
| Executive Board | • Overall responsibility for Group-wide risk management • Responsibility for the proper functioning of risk management • Definition of the risk strategy |
| Risk Committee | • Operational risk management, monitoring and coordinating body • Implementation and safeguarding of a consistent Group-wide risk management culture |
| Chief Risk Officer | • Responsibility for holistic risk monitoring across the Group as a whole and the business groups (systematic identification and assessment, control/monitoring and reporting) of all material risks from the Group perspective (technical risks in life /health and non-life reinsur ance, market risks, credit risks, operational risks and other risks) |
| Group Risk Management | • Risk monitoring across the Group as a whole and the business groups of all material risks from the company perspective • Methodological expertise in the development of processes and methods for risk analysis, assessment and management as well as for risk limitation and reporting |
| Business units 1 | • Risk steering; primary responsibility for risk identification and assessment on the depart mental level based on the guidelines of Group Risk Management • Setting up and monitoring of the department's internal control system (ICS) |
| Internal Auditing | • Process-independent and Group-wide supervision on behalf of the Executive Board |
1 Treaty /regional departments and service departments in the non-life and life and health reinsurance business groups as well as the investments sector
The qualitative and quantitative elements of our risk management are of crucial importance overall. In the interests of our shareholders and clients we strive to ensure that our risks remain commensurate with our capital resources.
Our quantitative risk management provides a uniform framework for the evaluation and steering of all risks affecting the company as well as of our capital position. In this context, the internal capital model is our central tool. The internal capital model of Hannover Re is a stochastic enterprise model. Based on predefined probability distributions, a large number of scenarios are generated for technical risks, counterparty defaults, capital market conditions and other business events and their effect on the company's financial situation is determined. The central variable in risk and enterprise management is the economic capital, which is calculated according to market-consistent measurement principles and in many respects corresponds to the business valuation likely to be adopted in future under Solvency II. The internal capital model encompasses all quantifiable risks and splits them into technical risks, market risks, credit risks and operational risks. These risks are carried over to Hannover Re's risk map and further broken down, e. g. into interest rate risks, catastrophe risks and reserving risks. Dependencies exist between these risks, which Hannover Re takes into account in order to adequately establish its target capitalisation. The model enables us to consistently measure and aggregate the individual risks and to analyse the interactions between risks. Last but not least, we are able to verify whether the level of available economic capital exceeds the capital required to operate the business.
Qualitative methods and practices are a fundamental element of our internal risk management and control system as well as of potential future requirements for the Own Risk and Solvency Assessment (ORSA). Systematic risk identification, analysis, measurement, steering and monitoring as well as risk reporting are crucial to the effectiveness of risk management as a whole. Only by giving prompt consideration to risks can the continued existence of Hannover Re be assured. The system that is in place – in common with the corporate and risk strategy – is subject to a constant cycle of planning, action, control and improvement. The Framework Guideline on Risk Management describes the existing elements of the risk management system that has been put in place. It is intended to establish homogeneous standards for risk management. The Framework Guideline defines, among other things, the major tasks, rights and responsibilities, the organisational framework conditions and the risk control process. Principles are also set out governing the evaluation of new products in light of risk considerations as well as risk reporting. Internal risk reporting safeguards systematic and timely communication within the company about all material risks. Risk reporting covers inter alia the defined limits and thresholds, key ratios, expert assessments and a summary presentation of the risk situation. The regular quarterly reporting is supplemented as necessary by immediate internal reporting on material risks and limit oversteps that emerge suddenly. The criteria for this reporting are also specified in the Framework Guideline on
Risk Management. Within the central system of limits and thresholds for the material risks, key ratios have been specified for steering and monitoring. Risk steering and monitoring is operationalised through the specification of suitable limits and thresholds for quantitatively measurable material risks. Material risks that cannot be quantified or are difficult to quantify (such as reputational risks) are primarily steered using appropriate processes and practices and are monitored with the aid of qualitative measurement methods, such as expert assessments.
Another key element of the overall system is the Framework Guideline on the Internal Control System (ICS). The purpose of this set of rules is to systematically steer and monitor the execution of our corporate strategy. We therefore always organise our business activities in such a way that they are in conformity with all legal requirements. In accordance with these principles, the Framework Guideline puts in place a consistent understanding of controls as well as a uniform procedure and standards for implementation of the ICS across all organisational units. The Framework Guideline defines concepts, stipulates responsibilities and provides a guide for the description of controls. In addition, it forms the basis for the accomplishment of internal objectives and the fulfilment of external requirements imposed on Hannover Re. The ICS consists of systematically structured organisational and technical measures and controls within the enterprise. It serves, inter alia, to safeguard compliance with guidelines and to reduce risks in the interests of secure execution of corporate strategy. This includes, among other things:
The risk landscape of Hannover Re encompasses:
• other risks.
• documentation of the controls within processes, especially in accounting,
In the area of accounting and financial reporting, processes with integrated controls ensure the completeness and accuracy of the financial statement. This ensures that we can identify and minimise the risk of material errors in the financial statement at an early stage. Given that our financial reporting is heavily dependent on IT systems, these systems also need to be subject to controls, e.g. by way of authorisation concepts regulating system access.
The specific risk characteristics and the principal monitoring and management mechanisms are described in the following sections.
Risk management in non-life reinsurance is geared to the following strategic objectives:
We make a fundamental distinction between risks that result from business operations of past years (reserving risk) and those stemming from activities in the current or future years (price / premium risk). In the latter case, special importance attaches to the catastrophe risk.
As mentioned above, a significant technical risk is the reserving risk, i.e. the risk of under-reserving losses and the associated strain on the underwriting result. In order to counter this risk we calculate our loss reserves based on our own actuarial estimations and establish, where necessary, additional reserves supplementary to those posted by our cedants as well as the IBNR reserve for losses that have already occurred but have not yet been reported to us. Liability claims have a major influence on this reserve. The IBNR reserve is calculated on a differentiated basis according to risk categories and regions.
Licensed scientific simulation models, supplemented by the expertise of our own specialist departments, are used to assess our material catastrophe risks from natural hazards (especially earthquake, windstorm and flood). Furthermore, we establish the risk to our portfolio from various scenarios in the form of probability distributions. The monitoring of the risks resulting from natural hazards is rounded out by realistic extreme loss scenarios. Within the scope of this process, the Executive Board defines the risk appetite for natural perils once a year on the basis of the risk strategy by specifying the portion of the economic capital that is available to cover risks from natural perils. This is a key basis for our underwriting approach in this segment. As part of our holistic approach to risk management across business groups, we take into account numerous relevant scenarios and extreme scenarios, determine their effect on portfolio and performance data, evaluate them in relation to the planned figures and identify alternative courses of action. For the purposes of risk limitation, maximum amounts are also stipulated for various extreme loss scenarios and return periods in light of profitability criteria. Adherence to these limits is continuously verified by Group Risk Management. The Risk Committee, Executive Board and Non-Life Executive Committee are kept regularly updated on the degree of capacity utilisation.
The price / premium risk lies primarily in the possibility of a random claims realisation that diverges from the claims expectancy on which the premium calculation was based. Regular and independent reviews of the models used for treaty quotation as well as central and local underwriting guidelines are vital management components. In addition, Hannover Re's regional and treaty departments prepare regular reports on the progress of their respective renewals. The reporting in this regard makes reference inter alia to significant changes in conditions, risks (such as inadequate premiums) as well as to emerging market opportunities and the strategy pursued in order to accomplish targets. The combined ratio is an important indicator when considering the profitability of reinsurance business.
| in % | Q1–3 2013 |
2012 | 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | 20051 | 20041 | 20031,2 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Combined ratio (non-life reinsurance) |
95.0 | 95.8 | 104.3 | 98.2 | 96.6 | 95.4 | 99.7 | 100.8 | 112.8 | 97.2 | 96.0 |
| Thereof catastrophe losses 3 |
8.8 | 7.0 | 16.5 | 12.3 | 4.6 | 10.7 | 6.3 | 2.3 | 26.3 | 8.3 | 1.5 |
1 Including financial reinsurance and specialty insurance
2 Based on US GAAP figures
3 Hannover Re Group's net share for natural catastrophes and other major losses in excess of EUR 10 million gross as a percentage of net premium earned (until 31 December 2011: in excess of EUR 5 million gross)
Risk management in life and health reinsurance is geared to the following strategic objectives:
All risks directly connected with the life of an insured person are referred to as biometric risks (especially the miscalculation of mortality, life expectancy, morbidity and occupational disability); they constitute material risks for our company in the area of life and health reinsurance. Counterparty, lapse and catastrophe risks are also material since we additionally prefinance our cedants' new business acquisition costs.
As in non-life reinsurance, the reserves are essentially calculated according to information provided by our clients and are also determined on the basis of secure biometric actuarial bases. Through our quality assurance measures we ensure that the reserves established by ceding companies in accordance with local accounting principles satisfy all requirements with respect to the calculation methods used and assumptions
We pursue an investment policy in which the primary emphasis is on the stability of the generated return. With this in mind, our portfolio is guided by the principles of broad diversification and a balanced risk /return ratio. The most significant market price risks are share price, interest rate and currency risks.
The short-term loss probability measured as the "Value at Risk" (VaR) is another vital tool used for monitoring and managing market price risks. It is calculated on the basis of historical data, e.g. the volatility of the securities positions under own management and the correlation between these risks. As part of these calculations the decline in the fair value of our portfolio is simulated with a certain probability and within a certain period. The VaR determined in accordance with these principles specifies the decrease in the fair value of our securities portfolio under own management that with a probability of
made (e.g. use of mortality and morbidity tables, assumptions regarding the lapse rate). New business is written in all regions in compliance with underwriting guidelines applicable worldwide, which set out detailed rules governing the type, quality, level and origin of risks. These global guidelines are revised annually and approved by the Executive Board. Special underwriting guidelines give due consideration to the particular features of individual markets. By monitoring compliance with these underwriting guidelines we minimise the risk of an inability to pay or deterioration in the financial status of cedants. Regular reviews and holistic analyses (e.g. with an eye to lapse risks) are carried out with respect to new business activities and the assumption of portfolios.
The interest rate risk, which in the primary sector is important in life business owing to the guarantees that are given, is of only minimal relevance to our company thanks to the structure of our contracts. The actuarial reports and documentation required by local regulators ensure that regular scrutiny also takes place on the level of the subsidiaries. The Market Consistent Embedded Value (MCEV) is a ratio used for the valuation of life insurance and reinsurance business; it is calculated as the present value of the future shareholders' earnings from the worldwide life and health reinsurance portfolio plus the allocated capital. The calculation makes allowance as far as possible for all risks included in this business. The Market Consistent Embedded Value is established on the basis of the principles of the CFO Forum published in October 2009. We published the MCEV for the 2012 financial year on our Internet website at the same time as the report on the first quarter of 2013.
95% will not be exceeded within ten trading days. A multifactor model is used to calculate the VaR indicators. It is based on time series of selected representative market parameters (equity prices, yield curves, spread curves, exchange rates, commodity prices and macro-economic variables). All asset positions are mapped on the level of individual positions within the multi-factor model; residual risks (e.g. market price risks that are not directly explained by the multi-factor model) can be determined through back-calculation and are incorporated into the overall calculation. Stress tests are conducted in order to be able to map extreme scenarios as well as normal market scenarios for the purpose of calculating the Value at Risk. In this context, the loss potentials for fair values and shareholders' equity (before tax) are simulated on the basis of already occurred or notional extreme events.
| -3.1 |
|---|
| -6.1 |
| +3.1 |
| +6.1 |
| -503.0 |
| -982.9 |
| +519.6 |
| +1,061.2 |
Further significant risk management tools – along with various stress tests used to estimate the loss potential under extreme market conditions – include sensitivity and duration analyses and our asset/liability management (ALM). Share price risks derive from the possibility of unfavourable changes in the value of equities, equity derivatives or equity index derivatives held in the portfolio. We have made such new investments only on a very modest scale as part of strategic participations. The scenarios for changes in equity prices consequently have only extremely slight implications for our portfolio. We spread the risks through systematic diversification.
The portfolio of fixed-income securities is exposed to the interest rate risk. Declining market yields lead to increases and rising market yields to decreases in the fair value of the fixedincome securities portfolio.
The credit spread risk should also be mentioned. The credit spread refers to the interest rate differential between a riskentailing bond and risk-free bond of the same quality. Changes in these risk premiums, which are observable on the market, result – analogously to changes in pure market yields – in changes in the fair values of the corresponding securities.
Currency risks are especially relevant if there is a currency imbalance between the technical liabilities and the assets. We reduce this risk through extensive matching of currency distributions on the assets and liabilities side. The short-term Value at Risk therefore does not include quantification of the currency risk. We regularly compare the liabilities per currency with the covering assets and optimise the currency coverage in light of relevant collateral conditions – such as different accounting requirements – by regrouping assets. Remaining currency surpluses are systematically quantified and monitored.
Real estate risks result from the possibility of unfavourable changes in the value of real estate held either directly or through fund units. They may be caused by a deterioration in particular qualities of a property or by a general downslide in market values (such as the US real estate crash). Real estate risks continued to grow in importance for our portfolio owing to our continuous involvement in this sector. We spread these risks through broadly diversified investments in high-quality markets of Germany, Europe as a whole and the United States. We use derivative financial instruments only to a very limited extent. The primary purpose of such financial instruments is to hedge against potentially adverse situations on capital markets. In 2012 we took out inflation swaps to hedge part of the inflation risks associated with the loss reserves in our technical account. In addition, as in the previous year, a modest portion of our cash flows from the insurance business was hedged using forward exchange transactions. Currency risks were also hedged using FX forwards in cases where currency matching could not be efficiently established.
The contracts are concluded with reliable counterparties and for the most part collateralised on a daily basis so as to avoid credit risks associated with the use of such transactions. The remaining exposures are controlled according to the restrictive parameters set out in the investment guidelines.
The credit risk consists primarily of the risk of complete or partial failure of the counterparty and the associated default on payment.
Since the business that we accept is not always fully retained, but instead portions are retroceded as necessary, the credit risk is also material for our company in reinsurance transactions. Our retrocession partners are carefully selected and monitored in light of credit considerations in order to keep the risk as small as possible. This is also true of our broker relationships, which entail a risk inter alia through the potential loss of the premium paid by the cedant to the broker. We minimise these risks, inter alia, by reviewing all broker relationships with an eye to criteria such as the existence of professional indemnity insurance, payment performance and proper contract implementation. The credit status of retrocessionaires is continuously monitored. On the basis of this ongoing monitoring a Security Committee decides on measures where necessary to secure receivables that appear to be at risk of default. This process is supported by a Web-based risk management application, which specifies cession limits for the individual retrocessionaires participating in protection cover programmes and determines the capacities still available for short-, medium- and long-term business. Depending on the type and expected run-off duration of the reinsured business, the selection of reinsurers takes into account not only the minimum ratings of the rating agencies Standard & Poor's and A. M. Best but also internal and external expert assessments (e.g. market information from brokers). Overall, retrocessions conserve our capital, stabilise and optimise our results and enable us to act on opportunities across a broader front, e.g. following a catastrophe loss event. Regular visits to our retrocessionaires give us a reliable overview of the market and put us in a position to respond quickly to capacity changes. Alongside traditional retrocessions in non-life reinsurance we also transfer risks to the capital market. Yet credit risks are relevant to our investments and in life and health reinsurance, too, because we prefinance acquisition costs for our ceding companies. Our clients, retrocessionaires and broker relationships as well as our investments are therefore carefully evaluated and limited in light of credit considerations and are constantly monitored and controlled within the scope of our system of limits and thresholds.
In terms of the Hannover Re Group's major companies, EUR 283.6 million (9.0%) of our accounts receivable from reinsurance business totalling EUR 3,159.5 million were older than 90 days as at the balance sheet date. The average default rate over the past three years was 0.08%.
Credit risks from investments may arise out of the risk of a failure to pay (interest and / or capital repayment) or a change in the credit status (rating downgrade) of issuers of securities. We attach equally vital importance to exceptionally broad diversification as we do to credit assessment conducted on the basis of the quality criteria set out in the investment guidelines. We measure credit risks in the first place using the standard market credit risk components, especially the probability of default and the potential amount of loss – making allowance for any collateral and the ranking of the individual instruments depending on their effect in each case. We then assess the credit risk first on the level of individual securities (issues) and in subsequent steps on a combined basis on the issuer level. In order to limit the risk of counterparty default we define various limits on the issuer and issue level as well as in the form of dedicated rating quotas. A comprehensive system of risk reporting ensures timely reporting to the functions entrusted with risk management.
| Rating classes | Government bonds | Securities issued by semi-governmental entities 2 |
Corporate bonds | Covered bonds / asset-backed securities |
|||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| in % | in EUR million |
in % | in EUR million |
in % | in EUR million |
in % | in EUR million |
||
| AAA | 24.4 | 1,493.0 | 54.9 | 3,715.3 | 1.6 | 164.9 | 63.4 | 3,163.4 | |
| AA | 60.4 | 3,687.8 | 41.8 | 2,823.8 | 14.5 | 1,530.7 | 14.9 | 742.9 | |
| A | 9.2 | 561.1 | 2.5 | 165.7 | 48.6 | 5,112.3 | 9.5 | 471.9 | |
| BBB | 4.9 | 298.0 | 0.6 | 38.5 | 28.9 | 3,044.9 | 7.8 | 388.9 | |
| < BBB | 1.1 | 67.6 | 0.2 | 11.8 | 6.4 | 671.5 | 4.4 | 218.3 | |
| Total | 100.0 | 6,107.5 | 100.0 | 6,755.1 | 100.0 | 10,524.3 | 100.0 | 4,985.5 |
1 Securities held through investment funds are recognised pro rata with their corresponding individual ratings
2 Including government-guaranteed corporate bonds
The measurement and monitoring mechanisms that have been put in place safeguard a prudent, broadly diversified investment strategy. This is reflected inter alia in the fact that within our portfolio of assets under own management the exposures to government bonds or instruments backed by sovereign guarantees issued by the so-called GIIPS states (Greece, Ireland, Italy, Portugal, Spain) amount to altogether just EUR 112.3 million on a fair value basis. This corresponds to a proportion of 0.3%. The individual countries account for the following shares: Italy EUR 64.9 million, Spain EUR 27.4 million and Portugal EUR 19.9 million. No impairments had to be taken on these holdings. Our portfolio does not contain any Irish government bonds; nor do we hold any bonds of Greek or Cypriot issuers. The breakdown into individual countries and specific exposures is shown in the following table.
| Government | Securities | Corporate bonds | Covered bonds / | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| in EUR million | bonds 1 | issued by semi governmental entities |
Financial bonds |
Industrial bonds |
asset-backed securities |
|
| Greece | – | – | – | – | – | – |
| Ireland | – | – | 5.6 | 20.9 | 83.1 | 109.6 |
| Italy | 64.9 | – | 73.0 | 114.8 | 153.7 | 406.4 |
| Portugal | 19.9 | – | – | 0.7 | 8.2 | 28.9 |
| Spain | 22.2 | 5.2 | 46.6 | 91.2 | 158.5 | 323.7 |
| Total | 107.1 | 5.2 | 125.3 | 227.6 | 403.4 | 868.5 |
1 Including government-guaranteed corporate bonds (risk-oriented approach)
On a fair value basis EUR 3,397.5 million of the corporate bonds held by our company were issued by entities in the financial sector. Of this amount, EUR 2,895.6 million was attributable to
Operational risks
Operational risks refer to the risk of losses occurring because of the inadequacy or failure of internal processes or as a result of events triggered by employee-related, system-induced or external factors. Operational risks are monitored primarily by way of appropriate process management. These risk potentials are evaluated inter alia on the basis of expert assessments and by means of scenario analyses. Such evaluations enable us to prioritise operational risks. When it comes to the monitoring of these risks, we attach special emphasis to the following individual risks.
Business process risks are associated with the risk of inadequate or deficient internal processes, e.g. as a consequence of poor data quality. Data quality is a critical success factor, especially in risk management, because all enterprise processes are based on the information made available. The overriding goal of our data quality management is to bring about sustainable improvement and to safeguard data quality, for example by way of regular data quality checks. In addition, as part of our process management, overarching and company-wide processes are continuously optimised and standardised.
banks. The vast majority of these bank bonds (70.9%) are rated "A" or better. Our investment portfolio under own management does not contain any written or issued credit default swaps.
Compliance risks are associated with the risk of breaches of standards and requirements, non-compliance with which may entail lawsuits or official proceedings with not inconsiderable detrimental implications for business activities (e.g. tax, antitrust, embargo, data privacy or regulatory law). Upon suspicion of breaches of the law, our employees and business partners are able to report such suspicions anonymously using our electronic whistleblower system, which can be accessed through our website. These tips are brought to the attention of the Compliance Office, which is thus able to investigate the grounds for suspicion. Responsibilities within the compliance organisation are regulated and documented in a manual. The process is documented in regular compliance reports and complemented by training activities.
We transact primary insurance business that complements our reinsurance activities in selected market niches. In so doing, just as on the reinsurance side, we always work together with partners from the primary sector – such as insurance brokers and underwriting agencies. This gives rise to risks associated with such sales channels, although these are minimised through the careful selection of agencies, mandatory underwriting guidelines and regular checks.
Fraud risks refer to the risk of intentional violations of laws or regulations by members of staff (internal fraud) and/or by externals (external fraud). This risk is reduced by the processintegrated internal control system as well as by the audits conducted by Internal Auditing on a line-independent basis.
The proper functioning and competitiveness of Hannover Re can be attributed in large measure to the expertise and dedication of our staff. In order to minimise personnel risks, we pay special attention to the skills, experience and motivation of our employees and foster these qualities through outstanding personnel development and leadership activities. Regular employee surveys, the monitoring of turnover rates and the holding of exit interviews ensure that such risks are identified at an early stage and scope to take the necessary actions is created.
Information technology risks and information security risks arise, inter alia, out of the risk of the inadequate integrity, confidentiality or availability of systems and information. Losses and damage caused by unauthorised access to IT systems or by computer viruses, for example, pose a serious threat to
Of material importance to our company in the category of other risks are primarily emerging risks, strategic risks, reputational risks and liquidity risks.
The hallmark of emerging risks is that the content of such risks cannot as yet be reliably assessed – especially on the underwriting side with respect to our treaty portfolio. Such risks evolve gradually from weak signals to unmistakable tendencies. It is therefore vital to detect these risks at an early stage and then determine their relevance. For the purpose of early detection we have developed an efficient process that spans divisions and lines of business and we have ensured its linkage to risk management.
Operational implementation is handled by an expert working group assembled specially for this task. The analyses performed by this working group are used in order to pinpoint any necessary measures (e.g. the implementation of contractual exclusions or the development of new reinsurance products). By way of example, the risks arising out of the emergence of large cities and urban conurbations – so-called megacities – are analysed by this working group. The growth of such urban centres goes hand-in-hand with a host of different problems, including a growing demand for food, drinking water, energy and living space. These challenges may also have implications for our treaty portfolio – in the form not only of risks but also opportunities, e.g. through increased demand for reinsurance products. Climate change, nanotechnology, political unrest, amendments to laws and changes in regulatory requirements as well as pandemics may be cited as examples of other emerging risks.
Hannover Re. Given the broad spectrum of such risks, a diverse range of steering and monitoring measures and organisational standards have been put in place. Among other things, our employees are made more conscious of such security risks through practically oriented tools and training opportunities, e.g. with regard to the handling of personal data.
When it comes to reducing business interruption risks, the paramount objective is the quickest possible return to normal operations after a crisis, for example through implementation of existing contingency plans. Guided by internationally accepted standards, we have defined the basic framework conditions and – among other measures – we have assembled a crisis team to serve as a temporary body in the event of an emergency. The system is complemented by regular exercises and tests. The partial or complete outsourcing of functions and/or services may give rise to associated risks. Regulatory and binding internal rules serve to minimise such risks. All risks associated with any instance of outsourcing must be identified, evaluated (e.g. by way of a performance assessment) and appropriately steered and controlled.
Strategic risks derive from a possible imbalance between the corporate strategy and the constantly changing general business environment. Such an imbalance might be caused, for example, by incorrect strategic policy decisions, a failure to consistently implement the defined strategies and business plans or an incorrect allocation of resources. We therefore regularly review our corporate strategy in a multi-step procedure and adjust our processes and the resulting guidelines as and when required. We have defined performance criteria and indicators for the operational implementation of the strategic guidelines; these are authoritative when it comes to determining fulfilment of the various targets. With the "Strategy Cockpit" the Executive Board and responsible managers have at their disposal a strategy tool that assists them with the planning, elaboration and management of strategic objectives and measures and safeguards their overall perspective on the company and its strategic risks.
Reputational risks refer to the risk that the trust put in our company by clients, shareholders, employees or the public at large may be damaged. This risk has the potential to jeopardise the business foundation of the company. A good corporate reputation is therefore an indispensable prerequisite for our core business as a reinsurer. Loss of reputation may occur, for example, as a consequence of a data mishap or a case of fraud. We use a number of different practices to minimise this risk, including for example our set communication channels, a professional approach to corporate communications, tried and tested processes for defined crisis scenarios as well as our established Code of Conduct. Our rules governing the use of social networks (social media) as well as the principles defined in our sustainability strategy for conducting business in a responsible and sustainable manner round off this set of tools.
The liquidity risk refers to the risk of being unable to meet our financial obligations when they become due. The liquidity risk consists of the refinancing risk, i.e. the necessary cash cannot be obtained or can only be raised at increased costs, and the market liquidity risk, meaning that financial market transactions can only be completed at a poorer price than expected due to a lack of market liquidity. Core elements of the liquidity management of our investments are, in the first place, management of the maturity structure of our investments on the basis of the planned payment profiles arising out of our technical liabilities and, secondly, regular liquidity planning as well as the asset structure of the investments. Above and beyond the foreseeable payments, unexpected and exceptionally large payments may pose a threat to liquidity. Yet in reinsurance business significant events (major losses) are normally paid out after a lead time that can be reliably planned. As part of our liquidity management we have nevertheless defined asset holdings that have proven to be highly liquid – even in times of financial stress. In addition, we manage the liquidity of the portfolio through ongoing monitoring of the liquidity of the instruments contained therein; liquidity is verified on a monthly and ad hoc basis. These measures serve to effectively reduce the liquidity risk.
The above remarks describe the diverse risk universe within which Hannover Re operates as well as the steps taken to manage and monitor these risks. Individual and especially accumulation risks can potentially have a significant impact on our assets, financial position and net income. Yet consideration solely of the risk aspect does not fit our conception of risk, since it is always the case that we only enter into those risks that go hand-in-hand with opportunities. Our management and monitoring tools as well as our organisational and operational structures ensure that we are able to identify risks in a timely manner and maximise our opportunities. The pivotal element in this regard is our effective system of qualitative and quantitative risk management. We are of the opinion that our risk management system affords us a transparent overview of the current risk situation at all times and that our overall risk profile is appropriate. Based on our currently available insights arrived at from a holistic analysis of the risk situation, the Executive Board of Hannover Re cannot discern any risks that could jeopardise the continued existence of our company in the short or medium term or have a material and lasting effect on our assets, financial position or net income. For additional information on the opportunities and risks associated with our business please see the Group Annual Report 2012.
In view of the available market opportunities, our good positioning and the development of business to date, we expect to achieve our goals for the full 2013 financial year. It remains our expectation that total gross premium will grow by around 5%.
In non-life reinsurance we expect the competitive environment to continue, in some areas with corresponding implications for conditions in reinsurance treaties. Nevertheless, the market should still be able to respond to losses with rate increases. With this in mind, we shall stand by our strategy of systematic cycle management combined with rigorous underwriting discipline.
At the same time, though, we see further attractive growth opportunities in non-life reinsurance. Increasing concentrations of values in urban conurbations as well as the adoption of risk-based solvency systems in Europe and Asia are ensuring stable demand for high-quality reinsurance protection. We therefore expect to see risk-appropriate conditions in the upcoming rounds of treaty renewals. The early indications that we took away from the industry gatherings in Monte Carlo, Baden-Baden and the United States, where initial discussions took place regarding the treaty renewals as at 1 January 2014, were correspondingly positive. In Germany, for example, we anticipate rising prices and improved conditions on the back of the accumulation of natural catastrophe events.
For the full 2013 financial year we are looking to grow our gross premium in non-life reinsurance by around 3% at constant exchange rates; the EBIT margin should come in comfortably higher than 10%.
Future developments in international life and health reinsurance will be crucially shaped by progress with the implementation of Solvency II, movements in interest rates around the world and economic growth. Assuming that there is no dramatic shift in the prevailing economic and political circumstances, we expect the remaining three months of the year to offer further promising business potential worldwide. Growing risk awareness and an expanding middle class in emerging markets are fostering rising demand for (re)insurance protection, especially for retirement provision and products designed to protect income and safeguard the financial future of the family. In mature insurance markets such as the United States, Scandinavia, United Kingdom, France and Germany, supervisory and regulatory requirements in the financial sector are driving constant changes. We support our primary insurance clients with tailored reinsurance solutions designed, inter alia, to afford solvency relief, optimise liquidity management and facilitate the more efficient leverage of their capital structure. We have the necessary expertise, know-how and resources, and with our international network we are able to respond to the individual needs of our clients anywhere in the world at any time.
The growth in organic gross premium anticipated for the remainder of 2013 remains unchanged in the range of 5% to 7% after adjustment for exchange rate effects. In terms of the EBIT margin, we are looking to a target of at least 2% in the fourth quarter for the reporting categories of Financial Solutions and Longevity, while an EBIT margin in the order of 6% should be attainable for Mortality and Morbidity business.
The expected positive cash flow that we generate from the technical account and our investments should – subject to stable exchange rates and yield levels – lead to further growth in our asset portfolio. In the area of fixed-income securities we continue to stress the high quality and diversification of our portfolio. With a view to stabilising the return in a stubbornly low interest rate environment we shall maintain the proportion of corporate bonds and further slightly expand our real estate portfolio. We are targeting a return on investment of 3.4% for 2013.
In view of the good overall business conditions in non-life and life/health reinsurance and bearing in mind our strategic orientation, we continue to anticipate Group net income in the order of EUR 800 million for 2013. This is subject to the premise that major losses do not significantly exceed the expected level of EUR 625 million for the full year and also assumes that there are no drastic downturns on capital markets. For 2013, as in recent years, we are again aiming for a dividend payout in the range of 35% to 40% of IFRS Group net income.
| Consolidated balance sheet as at 30 September 2013 | 22 |
|---|---|
| Consolidated statement of income as at 30 September 2013 | 24 |
| Consolidated statement of comprehensive income as at 30 September 2013 |
25 |
| Consolidated statement of changes in shareholders' equity as at 30 September 2013 |
26 |
| Consolidated cash flow statement as at 30 September 2013 | 28 |
| Assets in EUR thousand |
30.9.2013 | 31.12.20121 |
|---|---|---|
| Fixed-income securities – held to maturity | 2,722,328 | 3,605,956 |
| Fixed-income securities – loans and receivables | 3,269,105 | 3,415,187 |
| Fixed-income securities – available for sale | 22,338,853 | 21,782,072 |
| Fixed-income securities – at fair value through profit or loss | 42,097 | 147,413 |
| Equity securities – available for sale | 30,501 | 29,246 |
| Other financial assets – at fair value through profit or loss | 66,146 | 60,835 |
| Real estate and real estate funds | 976,733 | 647,961 |
| Investments in associated companies | 140,190 | 133,017 |
| Other invested assets | 1,021,023 | 970,798 |
| Short-term investments | 629,824 | 509,718 |
| Cash | 587,588 | 572,188 |
| Total investments and cash under own management | 31,824,388 | 31,874,391 |
| Funds withheld | 14,652,894 | 14,627,847 |
| Contract deposits | 79,244 | 123,258 |
| Total investments | 46,556,526 | 46,625,496 |
| Reinsurance recoverables on unpaid claims | 1,504,167 | 1,538,215 |
| Reinsurance recoverables on benefit reserve | 514,412 | 507,257 |
| Prepaid reinsurance premium | 183,910 | 138,373 |
| Reinsurance recoverables on other technical reserves | 5,612 | 2,611 |
| Deferred acquisition costs | 1,726,618 | 1,841,279 |
| Accounts receivable | 3,159,494 | 3,065,664 |
| Goodwill | 57,410 | 59,099 |
| Deferred tax assets | 583,068 | 620,456 |
| Other assets | 558,832 | 402,655 |
| Accrued interest and rent | 5,064 | 4,238 |
| Assets held for sale | 11,226 | 6,333 |
| Total assets | 54,866,339 | 54,811,676 |
| Liabilities in EUR thousand |
30.9.2013 | 31.12.2012 1 |
|---|---|---|
| Loss and loss adjustment expense reserve | 22,002,385 | 21,610,698 |
| Benefit reserve | 10,690,490 | 10,974,570 |
| Unearned premium reserve | 2,548,567 | 2,339,809 |
| Other technical provisions | 266,212 | 214,219 |
| Funds withheld | 859,887 | 821,060 |
| Contract deposits | 5,851,166 | 5,797,884 |
| Reinsurance payable | 1,062,739 | 1,121,409 |
| Provisions for pensions | 124,435 | 126,156 |
| Taxes | 165,446 | 237,552 |
| Deferred tax liabilities | 1,890,694 | 1,960,073 |
| Other liabilities | 559,800 | 493,311 |
| Long-term debt and subordinated capital | 2,451,184 | 2,400,791 |
| Total liabilities | 48,473,005 | 48,097,532 |
| Shareholders' equity | ||
| Common shares | 120,597 | 120,597 |
| Nominal value: 120,597 Conditional capital: 60,299 |
||
| Additional paid-in capital | 724,562 | 724,562 |
| Common shares and additional paid-in capital | 845,159 | 845,159 |
| Cumulative other comprehensive income | ||
| Unrealised gains and losses on investments | 588,332 | 987,918 |
| Cumulative foreign currency translation adjustment | (165,373) | (16,225) |
| Changes from hedging instruments | (9,455) | (9,455) |
| Other changes in cumulative other comprehensive income | (28,918) | (51,628) |
| Total other comprehensive income | 384,586 | 910,610 |
| Retained earnings | 4,526,751 | 4,276,703 |
| Equity attributable to shareholders of Hannover Rück SE | 5,756,496 | 6,032,472 |
| Non-controlling interests | 636,838 | 681,672 |
| Total shareholders' equity | 6,393,334 | 6,714,144 |
| Total liabilities | 54,866,339 | 54,811,676 |
| in EUR thousand | 1.7. –30.9.2013 | 1.1. –30.9.2013 | 1.7. –30.9.20121 | 1.1. –30.9.20121 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross written premium | 3,311,242 | 10,537,904 | 3,407,522 | 10,295,966 |
| Ceded written premium | 448,697 | 1,173,087 | 360,552 | 1,064,313 |
| Change in gross unearned premium | 46,063 | (299,645) | 68,069 | (385,037) |
| Change in ceded unearned premium | 17,146 | 52,101 | 19,144 | 112,353 |
| Net premium earned | 2,925,754 | 9,117,273 | 3,134,183 | 8,958,969 |
| Ordinary investment income | 277,474 | 781,075 | 290,026 | 821,984 |
| Profit/loss from investments in associated companies |
3,572 | 9,812 | 1,866 | 5,315 |
| Realised gains and losses on investments | 12,915 | 97,413 | 82,552 | 150,546 |
| Unrealised gains and losses on investments | 18,727 | (18,796) | 58,085 | 61,030 |
| Total depreciation, impairments and appreciation of investments |
5,228 | 13,393 | 3,449 | 15,469 |
| Other investment expenses | 23,324 | 70,526 | 21,050 | 62,208 |
| Net income from investments under own management |
284,136 | 785,585 | 408,030 | 961,198 |
| Income / expense on funds withheld and contract deposits |
80,081 | 267,630 | 91,281 | 247,564 |
| Net investment income | 364,217 | 1,053,215 | 499,311 | 1,208,762 |
| Other technical income | 1,600 | 2,436 | 134 | 951 |
| Total revenues | 3,291,571 | 10,172,924 | 3,633,628 | 10,168,682 |
| Claims and claims expenses | 2,226,173 | 6,800,868 | 2,289,276 | 6,558,039 |
| Change in benefit reserves | (6,197) | 45,270 | 135,059 | 273,291 |
| Commission and brokerage, change in deferred acquisition costs |
659,568 | 2,050,707 | 676,189 | 1,942,220 |
| Other acquisition costs | 1,730 | 3,620 | 2,050 | 9,541 |
| Other technical expenses | 1,536 | 8,246 | 852 | 2,825 |
| Administrative expenses | 87,728 | 259,726 | 70,592 | 226,948 |
| Total technical expenses | 2,970,538 | 9,168,437 | 3,174,018 | 9,012,864 |
| Other income and expenses | (30,060) | (42,860) | (40,026) | (139,045) |
| Operating profit (EBIT) | 290,973 | 961,627 | 419,584 | 1,016,773 |
| Interest on hybrid capital | 31,947 | 94,988 | 25,556 | 76,159 |
| Net income before taxes | 259,026 | 866,639 | 394,028 | 940,614 |
| Taxes | 52,039 | 217,411 | 90,174 | 215,093 |
| Net income | 206,987 | 649,228 | 303,854 | 725,521 |
| thereof | ||||
| Non-controlling interest in profit and loss | 1,523 | 36,049 | 38,351 | 54,724 |
| Group net income | 205,464 | 613,179 | 265,503 | 670,797 |
| Earnings per share (in EUR) | ||||
| Basic earnings per share | 1.70 | 5.08 | 2.20 | 5.56 |
| Diluted earnings per share | 1.70 | 5.08 | 2.20 | 5.56 |
| in EUR thousand | 1.7. – 30.9.2013 |
1.1. – 30.9.2013 |
1.7. – 30.9.20121 |
1.1. – 30.9.20121 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net income | 206,987 | 649,228 | 303,854 | 725,521 |
| Not reclassifiable to the consolidated statement of income | ||||
| Actuarial gains and losses | ||||
| Gains /losses recognised directly in equity | 3,089 | 5,552 | (8,326) | (24,991) |
| Tax income / expense | (986) | (1,771) | 2,661 | 7,986 |
| 2,103 | 3,781 | (5,665) | (17,005) | |
| Income and expense recognised directly in equity that cannot be reclassified |
||||
| Gains /losses recognised directly in equity | 3,089 | 5,552 | (8,326) | (24,991) |
| Tax income / expense | (986) | (1,771) | 2,661 | 7,986 |
| 2,103 | 3,781 | (5,665) | (17,005) | |
| Reclassifiable to the consolidated statement of income | ||||
| Unrealised gains and losses on investments | ||||
| Gains /losses recognised directly in equity | 24,841 | (489,009) | 415,223 | 859,923 |
| Transferred to the consolidated statement of income | (8,683) | (83,197) | (68,990) | (87,973) |
| Tax income / expense | (997) | 156,352 | (94,186) | (208,614) |
| 15,161 | (415,854) | 252,047 | 563,336 | |
| Currency translation | ||||
| Gains /losses recognised directly in equity | (76,767) | (170,935) | (48,477) | 44,980 |
| Transferred to the consolidated statement of income | – | (5,507) | – | – |
| Tax income / expense | 12,139 | 25,083 | 4,760 | (5,503) |
| (64,628) | (151,359) | (43,717) | 39,477 | |
| Changes from the measurement of associated companies Gains /losses recognised directly in equity |
14 | (13) | – | – |
| 14 | (13) | – | – | |
| Changes from hedging instruments | ||||
| Gains /losses recognised directly in equity | – | – | (12,656) | (13,890) |
| Tax income / expense | – | – | 4,041 | 4,435 |
| – | – | (8,615) | (9,455) | |
| Other changes | ||||
| Gains /losses recognised directly in equity | 2,716 | 27,332 | (4,305) | (20,173) |
| Tax income / expense | (774) | (8,055) | 1,293 | 6,089 |
| 1,942 | 19,277 | (3,012) | (14,084) | |
| Reclassifiable income and expense recognised directly in equity | ||||
| Gains /losses recognised directly in equity | (49,196) | (632,625) | 349,785 | 870,840 |
| Transferred to the consolidated statement of income | (8,683) | (88,704) | (68,990) | (87,973) |
| Tax income / expense | 10,368 | 173,380 | (84,092) | (203,593) |
| Total income and expense recognised directly in equity | (47,511) | (547,949) | 196,703 | 579,274 |
| Gains /losses recognised directly in equity | (46,107) | (627,073) | 341,459 | 845,849 |
| Transferred to the consolidated statement of income | (8,683) | (88,704) | (68,990) | (87,973) |
| Tax income / expense | 9,382 | 171,609 | (81,431) | (195,607) |
| (45,408) | (544,168) | 191,038 | 562,269 | |
| Total recognised income and expense | 161,579 | 105,060 | 494,892 | 1,287,790 |
| thereof: | ||||
| Attributable to non-controlling interests | 517 | 17,905 | 48,020 | 83,458 |
| Attributable to shareholders of Hannover Rück SE | 161,062 | 87,155 | 446,872 | 1,204,332 |
| in EUR thousand | Common shares | Additional paid-in capital |
(cumulative other comprehensive income) | Other reserves |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unrealised gains /losses |
Currency translation |
|||
| Balance as at 1.1.2012 | 120,597 | 724,562 | 453,115 | 11,559 |
| Changes in ownership interest with no change of control status |
– | – | (10) | (139) |
| Changes in the consolidated group | – | – | – | – |
| Capital increases / additions | – | – | – | – |
| Capital repayments | – | – | – | – |
| Acquisition/disposal of treasury shares | – | – | – | – |
| Total income and expense recognised directly in equity |
– | – | 532,147 | 40,129 |
| Net income | – | – | – | – |
| Dividends paid | – | – | – | – |
| Balance as at 30.9.2012 | 120,597 | 724,562 | 985,252 | 51,549 |
| Balance as at 1.1.2013 | 120,597 | 724,562 | 987,918 | (16,225) |
| Changes in ownership interest with no change of control status |
– | – | – | – |
| Changes in the consolidated group | – | – | – | – |
| Capital increases / additions | – | – | – | – |
| Capital repayments | – | – | – | – |
| Acquisition/disposal of treasury shares | – | – | – | – |
| Total income and expense recognised in equity |
– | – | (399,586) | (149,148) |
| Net income | – | – | – | – |
| Dividends paid | – | – | – | – |
| Balance as at 30.9.2013 | 120,597 | 724,562 | 588,332 | (165,373) |
The consolidated statement of changes in shareholders' equity for the previous year was adjusted retrospectively on the basis of IAS 8 due to effects resulting from the application of IAS 19R (cf. explanatory remarks on changes in accounting policies in Section 2 of the Notes).
| Total shareholders' equity |
Non-controlling interests |
Equity attributable to shareholders of Hannover Rück SE |
Retained earnings |
Continuation: Other reserves | (cumulative other comprehensive income) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | Hedging instruments |
||||
| 5,603,160 | 635,642 | 4,967,518 | 3,680,397 | (22,712) | – |
| 19 | 431 | (412) | (263) | – | – |
| (11,690) | 1,026 | (12,716) | (12,716) | – | – |
| 1,210 | 1,210 | – | – | – | – |
| (6,373) | (6,373) | – | – | – | – |
| (363) | – | (363) | (363) | – | – |
| 562,269 | 28,734 | 533,535 | – | (29,286) | (9,455) |
| 725,521 | 54,724 | 670,797 | 670,797 | – | – |
| (321,881) | (68,627) | (253,254) | (253,254) | – | – |
| 6,551,872 | 646,767 | 5,905,105 | 4,084,598 | (51,998) | (9,455) |
| 6,714,144 | 681,672 | 6,032,472 | 4,276,703 | (51,628) | (9,455) |
| 80 | 1,425 | (1,345) | (1,345) | – | – |
| (14,265) | (14,265) | – | – | – | – |
| 119 | 119 | – | – | – | – |
| (2,046) | (2,046) | – | – | – | – |
| – | 5 | 5 | – | – | |
| (544,168) | (18,144) | (526,024) | – | 22,710 | – |
| 649,228 | 36,049 | 613,179 | 613,179 | – | – |
| (409,763) | (47,972) | (361,791) | (361,791) | – | – |
| 6,393,334 | 636,838 | 5,756,496 | 4,526,751 | (28,918) | (9,455) |
| in EUR thousand | 1.1. –30.9.2013 | 1.1. –30.9.20121 |
|---|---|---|
| I. Cash flow from operating activities |
||
| Net income | 649,228 | 725,521 |
| Depreciation/ appreciation | 21,701 | 42,654 |
| Net realised gains and losses on investments | (97,413) | (150,546) |
| Net unrealised gains and losses on investments | 18,796 | (61,030) |
| Realised gains and losses on deconsolidation | (6,661) | – |
| Income from the recognition of negative goodwill | (176) | – |
| Amortisation of investments | 71,857 | 58,091 |
| Changes in funds withheld | (168,622) | (666,533) |
| Net changes in contract deposits | 163,211 | 585,313 |
| Changes in prepaid reinsurance premium (net) | 247,264 | 272,869 |
| Changes in tax assets /provisions for taxes | (6,552) | 44,712 |
| Changes in benefit reserve (net) | (98,205) | 208,950 |
| Changes in claims reserves (net) | 1,041,278 | 1,190,300 |
| Changes in deferred acquisition costs | 42,863 | 27,391 |
| Changes in other technical provisions | 62,488 | 15,322 |
| Changes in clearing balances | (275,908) | (139,931) |
| Changes in other assets and liabilities (net) | 10,792 | (9,109) |
| Cash flow from operating activities | 1,675,941 | 2,143,974 |
| in EUR thousand | 1.1. –30.9.2013 | 1.1. –30.9.2012 |
|---|---|---|
| II. Cash flow from investing activities |
||
| Fixed-income securities – held to maturity | ||
| Maturities | 883,773 | 366,096 |
| Purchases | (46,980) | – |
| Fixed-income securities – loans and receivables | ||
| Maturities, sales | 390,717 | 275,276 |
| Purchases | (254,586) | (151,309) |
| Fixed-income securities – available for sale | ||
| Maturities, sales | 6,091,855 | 6,490,177 |
| Purchases | (7,876,488) | (8,998,113) |
| Fixed-income securities – at fair value through profit or loss | ||
| Maturities, sales | 74,639 | 39,985 |
| Purchases | (11,548) | (29,604) |
| Equity securities – available for sale | ||
| Sales | 9,715 | 1,889 |
| Purchases | (9,247) | (3,935) |
| Other financial assets – at fair value through profit or loss | ||
| Sales | 44 | 492 |
| Purchases | (325) | – |
| Other invested assets | ||
| Sales | 93,553 | 143,923 |
| Purchases | (120,456) | (124,059) |
| Affiliated companies and participating interests | ||
| Sales | 9,178 | 23 |
| Purchases | (2,787) | (3,996) |
| Real estate and real estate funds | ||
| Sales | 35,039 | 217,424 |
| Purchases | (371,855) | (220,904) |
| Short-term investments | ||
| Changes | (144,281) | 345,191 |
| Other changes (net) | (23,142) | (32,439) |
| Cash flow from investing activities | (1,273,182) | (1,683,883) |
| in EUR thousand | 1.1. –30.9.2013 | 1.1. –30.9.2012 |
|---|---|---|
| III. Cash flow from financing activities | ||
| Contribution from capital measures | 119 | 6,324 |
| Payment on capital measures | (3,985) | (6,932) |
| Structural change without loss of control | 80 | 19 |
| Dividends paid | (409,763) | (321,881) |
| Proceeds from long-term debts | 50,954 | 51,202 |
| Repayment of long-term debts | (28) | (113,728) |
| Acquisition/disposal of treasury shares | 5 | (363) |
| Cash flow from financing activities | (362,618) | (385,359) |
| IV. Exchange rate differences on cash | (20,908) | 5,601 |
| Cash and cash equivalents at the beginning of the period | 572,188 | 506,963 |
| Change in cash and cash equivalents (I+II+III+IV) | 19,233 | 80,333 |
| Changes in the consolidated Group | (3,833) | – |
| Cash and cash equivalents at the end of the period | 587,588 | 587,296 |
| Supplementary information on the cash flow statement 1 | ||
| Income taxes paid (on balance) | (216,956) | (162,620) |
| Dividend receipts 2 | 42,413 | 54,509 |
| Interest received | 1,083,589 | 951,716 |
| Interest paid | (151,111) | (143,312) |
1 Since the 2012 annual financial statements the supplementary information on the cash flow statement has been expanded to include dividend receipts as well as a breakdown of interest received and paid. The figures for the previous year were recalculated in this context. The income taxes as well as dividend receipts and interest received are included entirely in the cash flow from operating activities. The interest paid is attributable in an amount of EUR 118,878 thousand (EUR 107,942 thousand) to the cash flow from financing activities and in an amount of EUR 32,233 thousand (EUR 35,370 thousand) to the cash flow from operating activities.
2 Including dividend-like profit participations from investment funds
| Notes | 32 | |
|---|---|---|
| 1. | General reporting principles | 32 |
| 2. | Accounting principles including major | |
| accounting policies | 32 | |
| 3. | Consolidated companies and consolidation | |
| principles | 37 | |
| 4. | Group segment report | 41 |
| 5. | Notes on the individual items of the | |
| balance sheet | 46 | |
| 6. | Notes on the individual items of the statement | |
| of income | 54 | |
| 7. | Other notes | 56 |
With the entry in the commercial register of Hannover County Court the conversion of Hannover Rückversicherung AG to the legal form of a European Company, Societas Europaea (SE), came into effect on 19 March 2013. The company thus bears the name Hannover Rück SE and has its registered office at Karl-Wiechert-Allee 50, 30625 Hannover, Germany.
The parent company Hannover Rück SE and its subsidiaries (collectively referred to as the "Hannover Re Group" or "Hannover Re") are 50.22% owned by Talanx AG and included in its consolidated financial statement. Talanx AG is majority-owned by HDI Haftpflichtverband der Deutschen Industrie V.a.G. (HDI). Hannover Re is obliged to prepare a consolidated financial statement and group management report in accordance with §290 German Commercial Code (HGB). Furthermore, HDI is required by §§341 i et seq. German Commercial Code (HGB) to prepare consolidated annual accounts that include the annual financial statements of Hannover Rück SE and its subsidiaries.
The consolidated financial statement of Hannover Re was drawn up in compliance with the International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) that are to be used within the European Union. This also applies to all figures provided in this report for previous periods. Since 2002 the standards adopted by the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) have been referred to as IFRS; the standards dating from earlier years still bear the name "International Accounting Standards (IAS)". Standards are cited in our notes accordingly; insofar as the Notes do not make explicit reference to a particular standard, the designation IFRS is used.
As provided for by IAS 34, in our preparation of the consolidated quarterly financial statement, consisting of the consolidated balance sheet, consolidated statement of income, consolidated statement of comprehensive income, consolidated cash flow statement, consolidated statement of changes in shareholders' equity and selected explanatory notes, we draw on estimates and assumptions to a greater extent than is the case with the annual financial reporting. This can have implications for items in the balance sheet and the statement of income as well as for other financial obligations. Although the estimates are always based on realistic premises, they are of course subject to uncertainties that may be reflected accordingly in the result. Losses from natural disasters and other catastrophic losses impact the result of the reporting period in which they occur. Furthermore, belatedly reported claims for major loss events can also lead to substantial fluctuations in individual quarterly results. Gains and losses on the disposal of investments are accounted for in the quarter in which the investments are sold.
The present consolidated quarterly financial statement was prepared by the Executive Board on 22 October 2013 and released for publication.
The quarterly accounts of the consolidated companies included in the consolidated financial statement were drawn up as at 30 September 2013.
The consolidated quarterly financial report was compiled in accordance with IAS 34 "Interim Financial Reporting". Consequently, the accounting policies adopted in the period under review were the same as those applied in the preceding consolidated annual financial statement; changes made in specific justified cases pursuant to IAS 8 are reported separately in the section entitled "Changes in accounting policies". For more details of the accounting policies please see the Group annual financial report for the previous year.
All standards adopted by the IASB as at 30 September 2013 with binding effect for the period under review have been observed in the consolidated financial statement.
IFRS 13 "Fair Value Measurement", a standard published in May 2011, must be applied prospectively to financial years beginning on or after 1 January 2013. The standard establishes uniform and consistent requirements for the measurement of fair value, which had hitherto been contained in various standards. In this context, the fair value is defined as the exit price, the calculation of which shall be based as far as possible on relevant observable inputs. In addition, extensive explanatory and qualitative disclosures are required; these are intended, in particular, to describe the quality of the calculation of fair value. Hannover Re applied IFRS 13 for the first time with effect from 1 January 2013. Initial application did not result in any significant change in the carrying values in the consolidated financial statement. With regard to the new disclosures we would refer overall to our remarks in the subsection "Information on fair values and fair value hierarchy" at the end of Section 5.1 "Investments under own management".
In June 2013 the IASB adopted "Novation of Derivatives and Continuation of Hedge Accounting" (Amendments to IAS 39 "Financial Instruments: Recognition and Measurement"). These amendments allow a novation of an OTC derivative designated as a hedging instrument to be deemed to be a continuation of the existing hedging relationship. The amendments, which have still to be adopted by the EU, have a mandatory effective date for annual periods beginning on or after 1 January 2014. Hannover Re is currently reviewing the implications of these amendments.
In May 2013 the IASB issued "Recoverable Amount Disclosures for Non-Financial Assets (Amendments to IAS 36 "Impairment of Assets")" and thereby modified disclosure requirements potentially resulting from IFRS 13 "Fair Value Measurement" that could have been broader than originally intended. It was thus clarified that disclosure of the recoverable amount is required only for impaired assets, including goodwill. In addition, the amendments to IAS 36 require an entity to disclose information about the fair value measurement and the discount rate used in determining impairment (or reversals). The amendments, which have still to be adopted by the EU, have a mandatory effective date for annual periods beginning on or after 1 January 2014. Hannover Re is currently reviewing the implications of these amendments.
In December 2011 the IASB issued "Offsetting Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities (Amendments to IAS 32)". While the offsetting rules for financial instruments remain unchanged, the application guidance of the standard clarifies the meaning of "currently has a legally enforceable right to set-off" and "simultaneous". The amendments have a mandatory effective date for annual periods beginning on or after 1 January 2014 and were adopted by the EU in December 2012.
In May 2011 the IASB published five new or revised standards governing consolidation, the accounting of investments in associated companies and joint ventures and the related disclosures in the notes.
In this connection IFRS 10 "Consolidated Financial Statements" and IFRS 11 "Joint Arrangements" replaced the previous standards governing consolidated financial statements and special purpose entities (IAS 27 "Consolidated and Separate Financial Statements" and SIC-12 "Consolidation – Special Purpose Entities") as well as the standards governing the accounting of interests in joint ventures (IAS 31 "Interests in Joint Ventures" and SIC-13 "Jointly Controlled Entities – Non-Monetary Contributions by Venturers").
The major new feature of IFRS 10 is that it identifies control as the single basis for verifying the consolidation requirement, irrespective of whether control is substantiated in company law, contractually or economically.
In accordance with IFRS 11 a proportionate inclusion of interests in joint ventures will no longer be permissible in future. Rather, interests in joint ventures must be accounted for using the equity method.
In addition, the disclosure requirements previously contained in IAS 27 and IAS 31 have been combined and restructured in IFRS 12 "Disclosure of Interests in Other Entities". With the aim of clarifying for the users of financial statements the nature of an entity's interest in other entities as well as the effects of those interests on its financial position, financial performance and cash flows, significantly expanded disclosures of information are required in comparison with the previous requirements.
The revised version of IAS 27 will in future consist solely of requirements for the accounting of investments in subsidiaries, jointly controlled entities and associates in separate (nonconsolidated) financial statements of the parent company. In this context, only minimal changes were made relative to the previous wording of the standard.
The revised version of IAS 28 "Investments in Associates and Joint Ventures" extends the content of standards governing the accounting of investments in associated companies to include rules governing the accounting of investments in joint ventures. In both instances application of the equity method is required.
In June 2012 the IASB issued "Consolidated Financial Statements, Joint Arrangements and Disclosure of Interests in Other Entities: Transition Guidance – Amendments to IFRS 10, IFRS 11 and IFRS 12". These amendments clarify that the effective date of IFRS 10 is 1 January 2013, if the financial year coincides with the calendar year. The requirement to provide adjusted comparative information is limited upon initial application to only the immediately preceding period; retrospective adjustments for subsidiaries sold in the comparative period are not required. Furthermore, it is not necessary to provide comparative information on unconsolidated structured entities upon initial application of IFRS 12. These amendments were adopted by the EU on 4 April 2013.
In October 2012 the IASB issued "Investment Entities (Changes to IFRS 10, IFRS 12 and IAS 27)". Insofar as the parent company meets the definition of an investment entity, an exception is provided in relation to the consolidation of subsidiaries required under IFRS 10. Rather than consolidate them, such parent companies are required to measure their investments in particular subsidiaries at fair value through profit or loss in accordance with IFRS 9 "Financial Instruments" or IAS 39 "Financial Instruments: Recognition and Measurement". These amendments have still to be adopted by the EU.
^The requirements of IFRS 10, 11 and 12 as well as the revised IAS 27 and 28 are to be applied to financial years beginning on or after 1 January 2013. The Accounting Regulatory Committee (ARC) decided in June 2012 that application of the aforementioned standards within the EU shall not be mandatory until one year later, with an effective date of 1 January 2014. The new IFRS 10, 11, 12 and the revised IAS 27 and 28 were adopted by the EU in December 2012.
In November 2009 the IASB issued IFRS 9 "Financial Instruments" on the classification and measurement of financial instruments. IFRS 9 is the first step in a three-phase project intended to replace IAS 39 "Financial Instruments: Recognition and Measurement" with a new standard. IFRS 9 introduces new requirements for classifying and measuring financial assets. The provisions of IFRS 9 were expanded in October 2010 with an eye to financial liabilities for which the fair value option is chosen. In December 2011 the IASB issued "Mandatory Effective Date and Transition Disclosures (Amendments to IFRS 9 and IFRS 7)", delaying the mandatory effective date of IFRS 9 to annual periods beginning on or after 1 January 2015. In addition, it modified the relief from restating comparable periods and the associated disclosures in IFRS 7. Neither IFRS 9 nor the specified subsequent amendments have yet been ratified by the EU.
The individual companies' statements of income prepared in the national currencies are converted into euro at the average rates of exchange and transferred to the consolidated financial statement. The conversion of foreign currency items in the balance sheets of the individual companies and the transfer of these items to the consolidated financial statement are effected at the mean rates of exchange on the balance sheet date.
| 1 EUR corresponds to: | 30.9.2013 | 31.12.2012 | 1.1. –30.9.2013 | 1.1. –30.9.2012 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean rate of exchange on the balance sheet date |
Average rate of exchange | |||
| AUD | 1.4489 | 1.2690 | 1.3512 | 1.2435 |
| BHD | 0.5089 | 0.4970 | 0.4969 | 0.4860 |
| CAD | 1.3919 | 1.3119 | 1.3501 | 1.2897 |
| CNY | 8.2628 | 8.2148 | 8.1309 | 8.1496 |
| GBP | 0.8365 | 0.8180 | 0.8505 | 0.8142 |
| HKD | 10.4665 | 10.2186 | 10.2243 | 10.0024 |
| KRW | 1,450.5059 | 1,407.2395 | 1,453.8469 | 1,464.1497 |
| MYR | 4.3977 | 4.0364 | 4.1460 | 3.9874 |
| SEK | 8.6562 | 8.5742 | 8.6043 | 8.7250 |
| USD | 1.3498 | 1.3182 | 1.3180 | 1.2892 |
| ZAR | 13.6178 | 11.2069 | 12.5182 | 10.3437 |
With effect from the third quarter of 2013 Hannover Re has adjusted the calculation logic for the amortisation of inflationlinked government bonds with the aim of smoothing seasonal fluctuations in the underlying inflation indices. This represents a change in an accounting estimate, which pursuant to IAS 8 "Accounting Policies, Changes in Accounting Estimates and Errors" is to be performed prospectively in the period under review without adjustment of the comparative figures for previous years. Retention of the parameters and methods used until 30 June 2013 would have resulted in a EUR 4.2 million lower amortisation amount in the period under review. In future, there will be no differences in the amortisation amounts as at the respective year-ends, because the adjustment of the parameters merely has a smoothing effect within the year that is reflected only at the end of the various quarters.
In June 2011 the IASB published amendments to IAS 1 "Presentation of Financial Statements". The revised IAS 1 requires entities to group items presented in OCI based on whether they are potentially reclassifiable to profit or loss subsequently, i.e. those that might be reclassified and those that will not be reclassified. Subtotals are to be shown accordingly for the two groups. Tax associated with items presented before tax is to be shown separately for each of the groups of OCI items. The amendments were adopted by the EU in June 2012 and are applicable retrospectively to annual periods beginning on or after 1 July 2012. Hannover Re applied the amended IAS 1 for the first time with effect from 1 January 2013, restructured the consolidated statement of comprehensive income and adjusted accordingly the disclosure for the comparable period in accordance with IAS 8 "Accounting Policies, Changes in Accounting Estimates and Errors". The changes did not have any implications for the carrying values in the consolidated financial statement or for Group net income.
As of 1 January 2013 Hannover Re applied for the first time the revised IAS 19 "Employee Benefits" (IAS 19R), which was issued by the IASB in June 2011. The standard has a mandatory effective date for annual periods beginning on or after 1 January 2013. The change was adopted in European law by the EU in June 2012. In accordance with the transitional requirements the standard was applied retrospectively in conformity with IAS 8 "Accounting Policies, Changes in Accounting Estimates and Errors".
The previous application of the corridor approach in the accounting of defined benefit pension plans resulted in actuarial gains and losses only being recognised to the extent that they exceeded certain size criteria. In addition, the portion to be recognised was spread over several years. An off-balancesheet recognition of partial amounts of the pension commitment also arose out of the previously applicable rules governing retrospective plan changes, which resulted in an increase in the existing commitment and hence in a past service cost. This past service cost was to be recognised immediately only to the extent that the additional benefits had already vested. Amounts above and beyond this were recognised pro rata until the resulting benefits vested.
In accordance with the revised IAS 19R all actuarial gains and losses ("remeasurements") are to be recognised immediately and entirely in OCI and past service costs in profit or loss for the period. In addition, the expected return on plan assets must in future be determined by applying the discount rate used to measure the defined benefit obligation. Given that pension commitments in the Hannover Re Group are funded only to a small extent through plan assets, there are no significant implications for Group net income. Furthermore, application of the revised IAS 19 resulted in a minimal adjustment of the accounting in connection with German partial retirement pension commitments.
The effects of the retrospective application of IAS 19R to the opening balance sheet as at 1 January 2012 and to the consolidated balance sheet as at 31 December 2012 as well as to the comparable period of the previous 2012 financial year are as follows.
| in EUR thousand | 1.1.2012 as stated |
Adjustments | 1.1.2012 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Assets | |||
| Deferred tax assets | 682,888 | 306 | 683,194 |
| Liabilities | |||
| Provisions for pensions | 88,299 | 6,951 | 95,250 |
| Deferred tax liabilities | 1,723,265 | (1,304) | 1,721,961 |
| Other liabilities | 443,671 | (1,846) | 441,825 |
| Total liabilities | 44,260,297 | 3,802 | 44,264,099 |
| Reserve as per IAS 19R | – | (4,159) | (4,159) |
| Total OCI | 446,121 | (4,159) | 441,962 |
| Retained earnings | 3,679,351 | 1,046 | 3,680,397 |
| Equity attributable to shareholders of Hannover Rück SE | 4,970,631 | (3,113) | 4,967,518 |
| Non-controlling interests | 636,024 | (382) | 635,642 |
| Total shareholders' equity | 5,606,655 | (3,495) | 5,603,160 |
| 31.12.2012 | Adjustments | 31.12.2012 |
|---|---|---|
| 620,493 | (37) | 620,456 |
| 86,464 | 39,692 | 126,156 |
| 1,972,373 | (12,300) | 1,960,073 |
| 494,604 | (1,293) | 493,311 |
| 48,071,433 | 26,099 | 48,097,532 |
| (16,216) | (9) | (16,225) |
| – | (24,417) | (24,417) |
| 935,036 | (24,426) | 910,610 |
| 4,275,613 | 1,090 | 4,276,703 |
| 6,055,808 | (23,336) | 6,032,472 |
| 684,472 | (2,800) | 681,672 |
| 6,740,280 | (26,136) | 6,714,144 |
| as stated |
The following adjustments were to be made in the consolidated statement of income for the comparable period of the previous year due to retrospective application of IAS 19R:
| in EUR thousand | 1.1. –30.9.2012 as stated |
Adjustments | 1.1. –30.9.2012 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Other income and expenses | (139,065) | 20 | (139,045) |
| Operating profit/loss (EBIT) | 1,016,753 | 20 | 1,016,773 |
| Net income before taxes | 940,594 | 20 | 940,614 |
| Taxes | 215,097 | (4) | 215,093 |
| Net income | 725,497 | 24 | 725,521 |
| thereof | |||
| Non-controlling interest in profit and loss | 54,735 | (11) | 54,724 |
| Group net income | 670,762 | 35 | 670,797 |
| Earnings per share (in EUR) | |||
| Basic earnings per share | 5.56 | – | 5.56 |
| Diluted earnings per share | 5.56 | – | 5.56 |
The capital consolidation complies with the requirements of IAS 27 "Consolidated and Separate Financial Statements". Subsidiaries are consolidated as soon as Hannover Re acquires a majority voting interest or de facto controlling influence. The same is true of special purpose entities, the consolidation of which is discussed separately below.
The capital consolidation is based on the acquisition method. In the context of the acquisition method the acquisition costs, measured at the fair value of the consideration rendered by the parent company on the acquisition date, are netted with the proportionate shareholders' equity of the subsidiary at the time when it is first included in the consolidated financial statement after the revaluation of all assets and liabilities. After recognition of all acquired intangible assets that in accordance with IFRS 3 "Business Combinations" are to be accounted for separately from goodwill, the difference between the revalued shareholders' equity of the subsidiary and the purchase price is recognised as goodwill. Under IFRS 3 scheduled amortisation is not taken on goodwill. Instead, impairment is taken where necessary on the basis of annual impairment tests. Immaterial and negative goodwill are recognised in the statement of income in the year of their occurrence. Costs associated with acquisition are expensed.
Companies over which Hannover Re is able to exercise a significant influence are normally consolidated "at equity" as associated companies with the proportion of the shareholders' equity attributable to the Group. A significant influence is presumed to exist if a company belonging to the Hannover Re Group directly or indirectly holds at least 20% – but no more than 50% – of the voting rights. Income from investments in associated companies is recognised separately in the consolidated statement of income.
Non-controlling interests in shareholders' equity are reported separately within Group shareholders' equity in accordance with IAS 1 "Presentation of Financial Statements". The noncontrolling interest in profit or loss, which forms part of net income and is shown separately after net income as a "thereof" note, amounted to EUR 36.0 million (EUR 54.7 million) as at 30 September 2013.
For further details we would refer to the relevant information in the consolidated financial statement as at 31 December 2012.
Receivables and liabilities between the companies included in the consolidated financial statement are offset against each other. Profits and expenses from business transactions within the Group are also eliminated.
Consolidation of special purpose entities
Business relations with special purpose entities are to be examined in accordance with SIC–12 "Consolidation – Special Purpose Entities" with an eye to their implications for consolidation. In cases where IFRS do not currently contain
Retrocessions and Insurance-Linked Securities (ILS)
As part of its extended Insurance-Linked Securities (ILS) activities, Hannover Re writes so-called collateralised fronting arrangements under which risks assumed from ceding companies are passed on to institutional investors outside the Group using special purpose entities. The purpose of such transactions is to directly transfer clients' business. Due to the lack of a controlling influence over the special purpose entities involved, there is no consolidation requirement for Hannover Re with respect to these structures.
The securitisation of reinsurance risks is largely structured through the use of special purpose entities.
In the previous year Hannover Re issued a catastrophe ("CAT") bond for the purpose of transferring to the capital market peak natural catastrophe exposures deriving from European windstorm events. The term of the CAT bond, which has a volume of nominally EUR 100.0 million, runs until 31 March 2016; it was placed with institutional investors from Europe, North America and Asia by Eurus III Ltd. Eurus III Ltd. is a special purpose entity domiciled in Hamilton /Bermuda that was registered in August 2012 as a "special purpose insurer" under the Bermuda Insurance Act 1978. The retrocessions concluded with the special purpose entity under the transaction afford Hannover Rück SE, E+S Rückversicherung AG and Hannover Re (Bermuda) Ltd. protection against the aforementioned catastrophe risks. Since Hannover Re does not exercise a controlling influence over Eurus III Ltd., there is no consolidation requirement for the special purpose entity.
Transactions between a disposal group and the continuing operations of the Group are similarly eliminated in accordance with IAS 27 "Consolidated and Separate Financial Statements".
any specific standards, Hannover Re's analysis – in application of IAS 8 "Accounting Policies, Changes in Accounting Estimates and Errors" – also falls back on the relevant standards of US GAAP.
In connection with the sale of the operational companies of the subgroup Clarendon Insurance Group, Inc. (CIGI), Wilmington, to Enstar Group Ltd., Hamilton /Bermuda, a partial portfolio of CIGI was retroceded to a special purpose entity with effect from 12 July 2011. The term of the retrocession arrangement runs until the underlying obligations have been finally settled. Since Hannover Re is not the major beneficiary of the special purpose entity and does not exercise either indirect or direct control over it, there is no requirement to consolidate this special purpose entity.
By way of its "K" transactions Hannover Re has raised further underwriting capacity for catastrophe risks on the capital market. The "K Cession", which was placed with investors in North America, Europe and Asia, involves a quota share cession on worldwide natural catastrophe business as well as aviation and marine risks. The volume of this securitisation was equivalent to EUR 243.7 million (EUR 268.0 million) as at the balance sheet date. The transaction has an indefinite term and can be cancelled annually by the investors. Kaith Re Ltd., a special purpose entity domiciled in Bermuda, is being used for the securitisation.
Hannover Re also uses the special purpose entity Kaith Re Ltd. for various retrocessions of its traditional covers to institutional investors. In accordance with SIC-12 Kaith Re Ltd. is included in the consolidated financial statement.
Some transactions in the life and health reinsurance segment necessitate the involvement of ceding special purpose entities as contracting parties that are established by parties outside the Group and from which member companies of the Hannover Re Group assume certain underwriting and / or financial risks. The transactions are used, among other things, to transfer extreme mortality risks above a contractually defined retention or to transfer longevity risks. Since Hannover Re does not bear the majority of the economic risks or benefits arising out of its business relations with these special purpose entities and cannot exercise a controlling influence over them, there is no consolidation requirement for Hannover Re.
Within the scope of its asset management activities Hannover Re has participated since 1988 in numerous special purpose entities – predominantly funds –, which for their part transact certain types of equity and debt capital investments. On the basis of our analysis of our relations with these entities we concluded that the Group does not exercise a controlling influence in any of these transactions and a consolidation requirement therefore does not exist.
Hannover Re participates – primarily through the companies Hannover Insurance-Linked Securities GmbH & Co. KG (HILS) and Leine Investment SICAV-SIF – in a number of special purpose entities for the securitisation of catastrophe risks
In August 2013 Hannover Re reached agreement with another investor on the acquisition of a financial participation in a company targeting the indirect acquisition of Heidelberger Lebensversicherung AG, Heidelberg, from a seller belonging to Lloyds Banking Group, London. Closing of the acquisition of Heidelberger Leben is still subject to regulatory approval.
In July 2013 HR GLL Central Europe GmbH & KG, Munich, acquired all shares of Investec GLL Ireland S.à.r.l., Luxembourg, from Investec GLL SGO REF Holding Alpha S.à.r.l., Luxembourg, and changed the company's name to HR GLL Europe Holding S.à.r.l., Luxembourg. The company is included in the consolidated financial statement for the first time with effect from the third quarter of 2013. The business object of the company, which at the time of purchase was an inactive shell company, is to acquire, finance, hold, exchange or sell securities of other companies. The company may issue debt securities in any form to the other companies, use its Depending upon the classification of the contracts pursuant to IFRS 4 or IAS 39, the transactions are recognised either in the technical account or as derivative financial instruments or as financial guarantees. Please see also our remarks in Section 7.1 "Derivative financial instruments and financial guarantees".
by investing in "disaster bonds" (or "CAT bonds"). While HILS will continue to manage its portfolio, new business in this area is written by the Luxembourg-based Leine Investment companies, which were established in the previous year. Leine Investment General Partner S.à.r.l. is the managing partner of the asset management company Leine Investment SICAV-SIF, the business object of which is to build, hold and manage a portfolio of insurance-linked securities and catastrophe bonds – including for third-party investors outside the Group. Since Hannover Re does not exercise a controlling influence in any of these transactions either there is no requirement to consolidate the special purpose entities concerned.
funds for the acquisition, sale, development, management and leasing of real estate in Luxembourg or abroad and effect all other commercial, industrial and financial transactions relating to moveable and real property. No contingent liabilities, conditional payments or separate transactions as defined by IFRS 3 were identified. The Munich-based HR GLL Central Europe Holding GmbH was established in January 2013 and included in the consolidated financial statement for the first time with effect from the first quarter of 2013. All shares of the company are held by HR GLL Central Europe GmbH & KG, Munich. The business object of the company is to purchase, manage, rent, lease and sell commercial real estate or equivalent rights in Europe as well as to establish and acquire subsidiaries in the form of real estate companies that acquire and hold such properties. Both holding companies have commenced their investing activities in special purpose property companies.
Within the US subgroup Hannover Re Real Estate Holdings, Inc., which is 95.1% owned, all shares in the property companies Broadway 101 LLC, Tempe, and River Terrace Parking LLC, New York City, were acquired for a purchase price equivalent to EUR 59.3 million through the subsidiary GLL HRE Core Properties, LP, Wilmington. The business object of each company is to hold and manage one property. In connection with the acquisition no intangible assets or goodwill were capitalised. No contingent liabilities, conditional payments or separate transactions as defined by IFRS 3 were identified.
With effect from 1 January 2013 Glencar Underwriting Managers, Inc., based in Chicago, United States (Glencar), was consolidated for the first time in view of the expansion recorded in the business volume. The business object of the company is to write specialty lines as well as property and casualty program business in the US market with a focus on small to mid-sized programs. In the second quarter of 2011 Funis GmbH & Co. KG, a wholly owned subsidiary of Hannover Re, participated in Glencar with a capital contribution of USD 98,000 (corresponding to 49.0% of the share capital). Preference shares in an amount of roughly USD 2.3 million were purchased in the course of the third quarter of 2011; of these, preference shares amounting to USD 1.6 million constitute voting, puttable equity instruments and were therefore recognised as debt pursuant to IAS 32. The remaining preference shares in an amount of roughly USD 0.7 million have the features of nonvoting, non-puttable equity instruments and are classified as equity pursuant to IAS 32. Given that Hannover Re holds a majority of the voting rights in Glencar, it has the possibility of exercising control over the company. For reasons of materiality Glencar was carried as a participating interest until the fourth quarter of 2012. At the time of initial consolidation and as at the balance sheet date, Funis held an interest of 49.0% in the share capital. The liabilities-side difference arising out of initial consolidation in an amount of EUR 0.2 million was recognised in income.
By way of the contractually agreed transfer of its management share in Secquaero ILS Fund Ltd., Georgetown, Grand Cayman back to the investment manager outside the Group, Hannover Re relinquished control over the company and its participations with effect from 1 January 2013. Since that date the company has therefore no longer been included in the consolidated financial statement, but is instead carried as a
Hannover Re transferred all the business of its subsidiary Hannover Life Reassurance (UK) Ltd., Virginia Water, to a newly established branch of the parent company Hannover Re with the same registered office effective 1 January 2013 by way of a so-called "Part VII transfer". The branch trades under the name Hannover Re UK Life Branch and was registered on 3 December 2012 under the Companies Act 2006. Hannover participating interest at net asset value and recognised under other invested assets. Income of EUR 1.2 million was carried under other income and expenses from derecognition of the assets and liabilities as well as initial recognition of the participating interest at net asset value. In addition, cumulative other comprehensive income of EUR 5.5 million was realised from currency translation.
Life Reassurance (UK) Ltd. was deleted from the Commercial Register on 8 January 2013 and liquidated with effect in the first quarter of 2013. Since this internal restructuring within the Group involves a transaction between companies under common control, the transaction does not give rise to goodwill nor does it have any implications for Group net income.
The segment information shown here is based on the same principles as those applied in the consolidated financial statement as at 31 December 2012. It follows the system used for internal reporting purposes, on the basis of which the full Executive Board regularly evaluates the performance of segments and decides on the allocation of resources to them. The "Consolidation" column includes not only the elimination of crosssegment transactions but also, more significantly, companies whose business operations cannot be unambiguously allocated to non-life reinsurance or life / health reinsurance. These are principally the service and financing companies belonging to the Group. Since the performance indicators used to steer the segments correspond to the system according to which the consolidated financial statement is prepared, a separate reconciliation of the segment results with the Group result is not provided. Both the companies that were consolidated for the first time in the first quarter of 2013 – namely Glencar Underwriting Managers, Inc., Chicago, HR GLL Europe Holding S.à.r.l., Luxembourg, and HR GLL Central Europe Holding GmbH, Munich – and Secquaero ILS Fund Ltd., which has no longer been included in the consolidated financial statement since the first quarter of 2013, are allocable to the non-life reinsurance segment. We would also refer to the relevant information in the consolidated financial statement as at 31 December 2012.
| Segmentation of assets | Non-life reinsurance | |
|---|---|---|
| in EUR thousand | 30.9.2013 | 31.12.20121 |
| Assets | ||
| Held to maturity | 2,400,927 | 3,213,397 |
| Loans and receivables | 3,169,812 | 3,313,608 |
| Available for sale | 16,213,687 | 15,572,034 |
| At fair value through profit or loss | 25,799 | 113,030 |
| Other invested assets | 2,042,055 | 1,679,251 |
| Short-term investments | 341,159 | 325,302 |
| Cash | 455,867 | 407,336 |
| Total investments and cash under own management | 24,649,306 | 24,623,958 |
| Funds withheld | 844,420 | 925,312 |
| Contract deposits | 2,050 | 25,803 |
| Total investments | 25,495,776 | 25,575,073 |
| Reinsurance recoverables on unpaid claims | 1,239,911 | 1,288,664 |
| Reinsurance recoverables on benefit reserve | – | – |
| Prepaid reinsurance premium | 182,556 | 135,999 |
| Reinsurance recoverables on other reserves | 405 | 1,103 |
| Deferred acquisition costs | 484,950 | 476,592 |
| Accounts receivable | 2,043,128 | 1,691,435 |
| Other assets in the segment | 1,413,436 | 1,288,719 |
| Assets held for sale | 11,226 | 6,333 |
| Total assets | 30,871,388 | 30,463,918 |
in EUR thousand
| Liabilities | ||
|---|---|---|
| Loss and loss adjustment expense reserve | 19,088,251 | 18,595,088 |
| Benefit reserve | – | – |
| Unearned premium reserve | 2,436,225 | 2,253,544 |
| Provisions for contingent commissions | 139,197 | 141,114 |
| Funds withheld | 436,499 | 432,884 |
| Contract deposits | 85,317 | 84,523 |
| Reinsurance payable | 768,914 | 702,224 |
| Long-term liabilities | 214,317 | 167,774 |
| Other liabilities in the segment | 1,870,652 | 1,868,048 |
| Total liabilities | 25,039,372 | 24,245,199 |
1 Adjusted on the basis of IAS 8
| Life and health reinsurance | Consolidation | Total | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 30.9.2013 | 31.12.20121 | 30.9.2013 | 31.12.2012 | 30.9.2013 | 31.12.20121 |
| 198,814 | 199,319 | 122,587 | 193,240 | 2,722,328 | 3,605,956 |
| 73,338 | 75,424 | 25,955 | 26,155 | 3,269,105 | 3,415,187 |
| 5,753,027 | 5,805,682 | 402,640 | 433,602 | 22,369,354 | 21,811,318 |
| 62,650 | 75,731 | 19,794 | 19,487 | 108,243 | 208,248 |
| 94,463 | 75,055 | 1,428 | (2,530) | 2,137,946 | 1,751,776 |
| 219,424 | 183,866 | 69,241 | 550 | 629,824 | 509,718 |
| 128,685 | 161,258 | 3,036 | 3,594 | 587,588 | 572,188 |
| 6,530,401 | 6,576,335 | 644,681 | 674,098 | 31,824,388 | 31,874,391 |
| 13,808,474 | 13,702,535 | – | – | 14,652,894 | 14,627,847 |
| 77,194 | 97,455 | – | – | 79,244 | 123,258 |
| 20,416,069 | 20,376,325 | 644,681 | 674,098 | 46,556,526 | 46,625,496 |
| 266,120 | 251,161 | (1,864) | (1,610) | 1,504,167 | 1,538,215 |
| 514,412 | 507,257 | – | – | 514,412 | 507,257 |
| 1,533 | 2,620 | (179) | (246) | 183,910 | 138,373 |
| 5,207 | 1,508 | – | – | 5,612 | 2,611 |
| 1,241,662 | 1,364,675 | 6 | 12 | 1,726,618 | 1,841,279 |
| 1,116,973 | 1,375,992 | (607) | (1,763) | 3,159,494 | 3,065,664 |
| 584,468 | 503,325 | (793,530) | (705,596) | 1,204,374 | 1,086,448 |
| – | – | – | – | 11,226 | 6,333 |
| 24,146,444 | 24,382,863 | (151,493) | (35,105) | 54,866,339 | 54,811,676 |
| 21,610,698 | 22,002,385 | (1,610) | (1,865) | 3,017,220 | 2,915,999 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10,974,570 | 10,690,490 | (234) | (101) | 10,974,804 | 10,690,591 |
| 2,339,809 | 2,548,567 | – | – | 86,265 | 112,342 |
| 214,219 | 266,212 | – | – | 73,105 | 127,015 |
| 821,060 | 859,887 | – | – | 388,176 | 423,388 |
| 5,797,884 | 5,851,166 | – | – | 5,713,361 | 5,765,849 |
| 1,121,409 | 1,062,739 | (2,029) | (606) | 421,214 | 294,431 |
| 2,400,791 | 2,451,184 | 2,228,465 | 2,236,867 | 4,552 | – |
| 2,817,092 | 2,740,375 | (677,712) | (786,794) | 1,626,756 | 1,656,517 |
| 48,097,532 | 48,473,005 | 1,546,880 | 1,447,501 | 22,305,453 | 21,986,132 |
| Segment statement of income | Non-life reinsurance | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| in EUR thousand | 1.1. –30.9.2013 | 1.1. –30.9.20121 | ||
| Gross written premium | 5,956,438 | 5,897,028 | ||
| Thereof | ||||
| From insurance business with other segments | – | 212 | ||
| From insurance business with external third parties | 5,956,438 | 5,896,816 | ||
| Net premium earned | 5,093,209 | 5,017,501 | ||
| Net investment income | 577,987 | 702,128 | ||
| Thereof | ||||
| Unrealised gains and losses on investments | (26,128) | 12,043 | ||
| Total depreciation, impairments and appreciation of investments | 13,340 | 12,660 | ||
| Income / expense on funds withheld and contract deposits | 10,784 | 8,305 | ||
| Claims and claims expenses | 3,540,004 | 3,580,989 | ||
| Change in benefit reserve | – | – | ||
| Commission and brokerage, change in deferred acquisition costs and other technical income / expenses |
1,166,653 | 1,143,813 | ||
| Administrative expenses | 143,120 | 122,958 | ||
| Other income and expenses | (16,806) | (105,830) | ||
| Operating profit/loss (EBIT) | 804,613 | 766,039 | ||
| Interest on hybrid capital | – | – | ||
| Net income before taxes | 804,613 | 766,039 | ||
| Taxes | 233,795 | 189,674 | ||
| Net income | 570,818 | 576,365 | ||
| Thereof | ||||
| Non-controlling interest in profit or loss | 36,423 | 51,614 | ||
| Group net income | 534,395 | 524,751 |
1 Adjusted on the basis of IAS 8
| Life and health reinsurance | Consolidation | Total | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1.1. –30.9.2013 | 1.1. –30.9.20121 | 1.1. –30.9.2013 | 1.1. –30.9.2012 | 1.1. –30.9.2013 | 1.1. –30.9.20121 |
| 4,581,613 | 4,399,287 | (147) | (349) | 10,537,904 | 10,295,966 |
| 147 | 137 | (147) | (349) | – | – |
| 4,581,466 | 4,399,150 | – | – | 10,537,904 | 10,295,966 |
| 4,023,679 | 3,941,470 | 385 | (2) | 9,117,273 | 8,958,969 |
| 460,543 | 487,159 | 14,685 | 19,475 | 1,053,215 | 1,208,762 |
| 6,785 | 46,499 | 547 | 2,488 | (18,796) | 61,030 |
| 53 | 2,809 | – | – | 13,393 | 15,469 |
| 256,846 | 239,259 | – | – | 267,630 | 247,564 |
| 3,260,867 | 2,977,576 | (3) | (526) | 6,800,868 | 6,558,039 |
| 45,137 | 273,294 | 133 | (3) | 45,270 | 273,291 |
| 893,479 | 817,910 | 5 | (8,088) | 2,060,137 | 1,953,635 |
| 116,419 | 105,965 | 187 | (1,975) | 259,726 | 226,948 |
| (24,876) | (20,591) | (1,178) | (12,624) | (42,860) | (139,045) |
| 143,444 | 233,293 | 13,570 | 17,441 | 961,627 | 1,016,773 |
| – | – | 94,988 | 76,159 | 94,988 | 76,159 |
| 143,444 | 233,293 | (81,418) | (58,718) | 866,639 | 940,614 |
| 7,841 | 41,617 | (24,225) | (16,198) | 217,411 | 215,093 |
| 135,603 | 191,676 | (57,193) | (42,520) | 649,228 | 725,521 |
| (374) | 3,110 | – | – | 36,049 | 54,724 |
| 135,977 | 188,566 | (57,193) | (42,520) | 613,179 | 670,797 |
Investments are classified and measured in accordance with IAS 39 "Financial Instruments: Recognition and Measurement". Hannover Re classifies investments according to the following categories: held-to-maturity, loans and receivables, financial assets at fair value through profit or loss and availablefor-sale. The allocation and measurement of investments are determined by the investment intent.
The investments under own management also encompass investments in associated companies, real estate and real estate funds (also includes: investment property), other invested assets, short-term investments and cash.
Real estate which is held for sale as defined by IFRS 5 is recognised separately in the consolidated balance sheet. The intention to sell is based upon individual real estate market and property-specific circumstances in light of current and future opportunity/risk profiles. The gross book values of the properties amounted to EUR 12.0 million (EUR 14.4 million) and the cumulative depreciation totalled EUR 0.8 million (EUR 8.0 million) at the time of reclassification. The measurement of real estate at fair value less cost to sell did not give rise to any impairment.
For further details we would refer to the relevant information in the consolidated financial statement as at 31 December 2012.
The following table shows the regional origin of the investments under own management.
| in EUR thousand | 30.9.2013 | 31.12.2012 |
|---|---|---|
| Regional origin | ||
| Germany | 6,449,336 | 6,779,027 |
| United Kingdom | 2,275,563 | 2,955,807 |
| France | 1,679,381 | 1,819,918 |
| Other | 7,196,813 | 6,348,984 |
| Europe | 17,601,093 | 17,903,736 |
| USA | 8,426,057 | 8,065,355 |
| Other | 1,271,253 | 1,162,038 |
| North America | 9,697,310 | 9,227,393 |
| Asia | 1,324,933 | 1,301,702 |
| Australia | 2,021,162 | 2,245,320 |
| Australasia | 3,346,095 | 3,547,022 |
| Africa | 335,255 | 417,557 |
| Other | 844,635 | 778,683 |
| Total | 31,824,388 | 31,874,391 |
| in EUR thousand | 30.9.2013 | 31.12.2012 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amortised cost 1 | Fair value | Amortised cost 1 | Fair value | |
| Held to maturity | ||||
| due in one year | 455,171 | 460,493 | 908,601 | 916,267 |
| due after one through two years | 1,000,711 | 1,049,919 | 606,525 | 629,138 |
| due after two through three years | 699,886 | 747,628 | 1,089,354 | 1,171,603 |
| due after three through four years | 184,842 | 198,155 | 532,996 | 577,930 |
| due after four through five years | 70,614 | 72,754 | 150,735 | 162,378 |
| due after five through ten years | 308,719 | 333,483 | 315,208 | 350,218 |
| due after more than ten years | 2,385 | 2,934 | 2,537 | 3,198 |
| Total | 2,722,328 | 2,865,366 | 3,605,956 | 3,810,732 |
| Loans and receivables | ||||
| due in one year | 238,706 | 240,282 | 207,861 | 216,965 |
| due after one through two years | 258,276 | 267,622 | 408,386 | 423,503 |
| due after two through three years | 367,321 | 393,212 | 311,764 | 330,670 |
| due after three through four years | 352,761 | 377,082 | 382,075 | 417,721 |
| due after four through five years | 80,115 | 84,272 | 285,438 | 312,267 |
| due after five through ten years | 1,138,954 | 1,225,224 | 1,033,273 | 1,156,510 |
| due after more than ten years | 832,972 | 918,379 | 786,390 | 922,804 |
| Total | 3,269,105 | 3,506,073 | 3,415,187 | 3,780,440 |
| Available for sale | ||||
| due in one year 2 | 3,320,347 | 3,330,846 | 2,379,998 | 2,387,173 |
| due after one through two years | 2,694,840 | 2,742,302 | 2,758,881 | 2,797,560 |
| due after two through three years | 2,146,663 | 2,226,842 | 2,525,881 | 2,616,092 |
| due after three through four years | 2,076,730 | 2,132,959 | 1,775,135 | 1,862,419 |
| due after four through five years | 2,579,093 | 2,616,983 | 2,436,644 | 2,549,947 |
| due after five through ten years | 7,494,320 | 7,669,169 | 7,132,799 | 7,617,225 |
| due after more than ten years | 2,712,102 | 2,837,164 | 2,709,969 | 3,033,562 |
| Total | 23,024,095 | 23,556,265 | 21,719,307 | 22,863,978 |
| Financial assets at fair value through profit or loss |
||||
| due in one year | 9,215 | 9,215 | 69,544 | 69,544 |
| due after one through two years | 5,801 | 5,801 | 15,626 | 15,626 |
| due after two through three years | 2,227 | 2,227 | 17,619 | 17,619 |
| due after three through four years | 5,060 | 5,060 | 14,823 | 14,823 |
| due after four through five years | 1,852 | 1,852 | 4,936 | 4,936 |
| due after five through ten years | – | – | 7,276 | 7,276 |
| due after more than ten years | 17,942 | 17,942 | 17,589 | 17,589 |
| Total | 42,097 | 42,097 | 147,413 | 147,413 |
1 Including accrued interest
2 Including short-term investments and cash
Amortised cost, unrealised gains and losses and accrued interest on the portfolio of investments classified as held to maturity as well as their fair value
| in EUR thousand | 30.9.2013 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amortised cost |
Unrealised gains |
Unrealised losses |
Accrued interest |
Fair value | |
| Investments held to maturity | |||||
| Fixed-income securities | |||||
| Government debt securities of EU member states |
390,031 | 19,800 | – | 7,074 | 416,905 |
| US treasury notes | 507,985 | 16,380 | – | 4,793 | 529,158 |
| Other foreign government debt securities |
52,095 | 389 | 5 | 608 | 53,087 |
| Debt securities issued by semi-governmental entities |
531,337 | 26,548 | – | 7,147 | 565,032 |
| Corporate securities | 230,320 | 11,468 | 1,792 | 3,719 | 243,715 |
| Covered bonds / asset-backed securities |
967,793 | 70,250 | – | 19,426 | 1,057,469 |
| Total | 2,679,561 | 144,835 | 1,797 | 42,767 | 2,865,366 |
Amortised cost, unrealised gains and losses and accrued interest on the portfolio of investments classified as held to maturity as well as their fair value
| in EUR thousand | 31.12.2012 | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amortised cost |
Unrealised gains |
Unrealised losses |
Accrued interest |
Fair value | ||
| Investments held to maturity | ||||||
| Fixed-income securities | ||||||
| Government debt securities of EU member states |
393,836 | 28,425 | – | 7,097 | 429,358 | |
| US treasury notes | 819,013 | 27,592 | – | 6,208 | 852,813 | |
| Other foreign government debt securities |
56,054 | 611 | 42 | 160 | 56,783 | |
| Debt securities issued by semi-governmental entities |
650,493 | 39,766 | – | 9,744 | 700,003 | |
| Corporate securities | 449,024 | 18,863 | 872 | 9,172 | 476,187 | |
| Covered bonds / asset-backed securities |
1,181,346 | 90,836 | 403 | 23,809 | 1,295,588 | |
| Total | 3,549,766 | 206,093 | 1,317 | 56,190 | 3,810,732 |
Amortised cost, unrealised gains and losses and accrued interest on loans and receivables as well as their fair value
| in EUR thousand | 30.9.2013 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amortised cost |
Unrealised gains |
Unrealised losses |
Accrued interest |
Fair value | |
| Loans and receivables | |||||
| Debt securities issued by semi-governmental entities |
1,857,246 | 153,050 | 4,188 | 29,014 | 2,035,122 |
| Corporate securities | 367,926 | 16,963 | 3,258 | 6,723 | 388,354 |
| Covered bonds / asset-backed securities |
991,672 | 77,474 | 3,073 | 16,524 | 1,082,597 |
| Total | 3,216,844 | 247,487 | 10,519 | 52,261 | 3,506,073 |
| 31.12.2012 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amortised cost |
Unrealised gains |
Unrealised losses |
Accrued interest |
Fair value |
| 10,271 | 590 | – | 204 | 11,065 |
| 2,005,258 | 238,045 | 58 | 30,095 | 2,273,340 |
| 330,248 | 23,476 | 15 | 4,981 | 358,690 |
| 1,018,651 | 103,215 | – | 15,479 | 1,137,345 |
| 3,364,428 | 365,326 | 73 | 50,759 | 3,780,440 |
Amortised cost, unrealised gains and losses and accrued interest on the portfolio of investments classified as available for sale as well as their fair value
| in EUR thousand | 30.9.2013 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amortised cost |
Unrealised gains |
Unrealised losses |
Accrued interest |
Fair value | |
| Available for sale | |||||
| Fixed-income securities | |||||
| Government debt securities of EU member states |
1,777,295 | 43,321 | 14,514 | 17,941 | 1,824,043 |
| US treasury notes | 1,745,025 | 21,672 | 10,665 | 3,445 | 1,759,477 |
| Other foreign government debt securities |
1,495,461 | 7,965 | 31,593 | 10,786 | 1,482,619 |
| Debt securities issued by semi-governmental entities |
4,166,295 | 137,506 | 22,261 | 48,834 | 4,330,374 |
| Corporate securities | 9,490,216 | 321,501 | 104,709 | 131,591 | 9,838,599 |
| Covered bonds / asset-backed securities |
2,773,520 | 183,206 | 17,217 | 32,956 | 2,972,465 |
| Investment funds | 113,318 | 18,421 | 463 | – | 131,276 |
| 21,561,130 | 733,592 | 201,422 | 245,553 | 22,338,853 | |
| Equity securities | |||||
| Shares | 12,816 | 4,208 | 24 | – | 17,000 |
| Investment funds | 10,289 | 3,212 | – | – | 13,501 |
| 23,105 | 7,420 | 24 | – | 30,501 | |
| Short-term investments | 628,061 | – | – | 1,763 | 629,824 |
| Total | 22,212,296 | 741,012 | 201,446 | 247,316 | 22,999,178 |
| in EUR thousand | 31.12.2012 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amortised cost |
Unrealised gains |
Unrealised losses |
Accrued interest |
Fair value | |
| Available for sale | |||||
| Fixed-income securities | |||||
| Government debt securities of EU member states |
1,837,251 | 80,205 | 2,625 | 17,715 | 1,932,546 |
| US treasury notes | 1,220,030 | 41,560 | 2,463 | 4,164 | 1,263,291 |
| Other foreign government debt securities |
1,634,844 | 22,801 | 1,933 | 16,842 | 1,672,554 |
| Debt securities issued by semi-governmental entities |
4,199,653 | 245,014 | 2,779 | 53,405 | 4,495,293 |
| Corporate securities | 8,568,646 | 559,256 | 11,301 | 133,424 | 9,250,025 |
| Covered bonds / asset-backed securities |
2,733,081 | 197,507 | 9,499 | 35,536 | 2,956,625 |
| Investment funds | 182,864 | 28,874 | – | – | 211,738 |
| 20,376,369 | 1,175,217 | 30,600 | 261,086 | 21,782,072 | |
| Equity securities | |||||
| Shares | 12,206 | 3,945 | 1 | – | 16,150 |
| Investment funds | 10,931 | 2,165 | – | – | 13,096 |
| 23,137 | 6,110 | 1 | – | 29,246 | |
| Short-term investments | 505,151 | 54 | – | 4,513 | 509,718 |
| Total | 20,904,657 | 1,181,381 | 30,601 | 265,599 | 22,321,036 |
Fair value of financial assets at fair value through profit or loss before and after accrued interest as well as accrued interest on such financial assets
| in EUR thousand | 30.9.2013 | 31.12.2012 | 30.9.2013 | 31.12.2012 | 30.9.2013 | 31.12.2012 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fair value before accrued interest |
Accrued interest | Fair value | ||||
| Financial assets at fair value through profit or loss |
||||||
| Fixed-income securities | ||||||
| Corporate securities | 24,115 | 54,474 | 402 | 13,305 | 24,517 | 67,779 |
| Covered bonds / asset-backed securi ties |
17,527 | 79,634 | 53 | – | 17,580 | 79,634 |
| 41,642 | 134,108 | 455 | 13,305 | 42,097 | 147,413 | |
| Other financial assets | ||||||
| Derivatives | 66,146 | 60,835 | – | – | 66,146 | 60,835 |
| 66,146 | 60,835 | – | – | 66,146 | 60,835 | |
| Total | 107,788 | 194,943 | 455 | 13,305 | 108,243 | 208,248 |
The methods and models set out below are used to establish the fair value of financial instruments on the assets and liabilities side of the balance sheet. The fair value of a financial instrument corresponds in principle to the amount that Hannover Re would receive or pay if it were to sell or settle the said financial instrument on the balance sheet date. Insofar as market prices are listed on markets for financial instruments, their bid price is used. In other cases the fair values are established on the basis of the market conditions prevailing on the balance sheet date for financial assets with similar credit rating, duration and return characteristics or using recognised models of mathematical finance. Hannover Re uses a number of different valuation models for this purpose. The details are set out in the following table.
The operating units responsible for the coordination and documentation of measurement are organisationally separate from the operating units that enter into investment risks. All relevant measurement processes and measurement methods are documented. Decisions on measurement-related policy issues are taken by a Measurement Committee that meets on a monthly basis.
| Valuation models | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Financial instrument | Pricing method | Parameter | Pricing model |
| Fixed-income securities | |||
| Unlisted plain vanilla bonds, interest rate swaps |
Theoretical price | Interest rate curve | Present-value method |
| Unlisted structured bonds | Theoretical price | Interest rate curve Volatility surfaces |
Hull-White, Black-Karasinski, LIBOR market model etc. |
| Unlisted bond funds | Theoretical price | Audited net asset values (NAV) |
Net asset value method |
| ABS/MBS for which no market prices are available |
Theoretical price | Prepayment speed, incurred losses, default probabilities, recovery rates |
Future cash flow method, liquidation method |
| CDOs /CLOs Profit participation certificates |
Theoretical price | Risk premiums, default rates, recovery rates, redemptions |
Present-value method |
| Equities | |||
| Unlisted equities | Theoretical price | Acquisition cost, cash flows, EBIT multiples, as applicable book value |
Net asset value method |
| Other invested assets | |||
| Private equity | Theoretical price | Acquisition cost, cash flows, EBIT multiples, market prices |
Net asset value method |
| Other financial assets – at fair value through profit or loss | |||
| Currency forwards | Theoretical price | Interest-rate curves, spot and forward rates |
Interest parity model |
| OTC stock options, OTC stock index options |
Theoretical price | Listing of the underlying share, implicit volatilities, money market interest rate, dividend yield |
Black-Scholes |
| Insurance derivatives | Theoretical price | Market values, actuarial para meters, interest rate curve |
Present-value method |
| Inflation swaps | Theoretical price | Inflation swap rates, histori cal index fixings, interest rate curves, seasonality effects |
Present-value method |
For the purposes of the disclosure requirements pursuant to IFRS 7 "Financial Instruments: Disclosures", the financial instruments recognised at fair value in the balance sheet are to be assigned to a three-level fair value hierarchy. This hierarchy, which reflects characteristics of the price data and inputs used for measurement purposes, is structured as follows:
observable market data and are not included within level 1. This level includes, in particular, prices for comparable assets and liabilities, prices on markets that are not considered active as well as inputs derived from such prices or market data.
• Level 3: Inputs used for measurement that are not based on observable market data (unobservable inputs).
The following table shows the breakdown of the financial instruments recognised at fair value into the three-level fair value hierarchy.
| in EUR thousand | 30.9.2013 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Total | |
| Fixed-income securities | 7,589,799 | 14,786,428 | 4,723 | 22,380,950 |
| Equity securities | 30,493 | – | 8 | 30,501 |
| Other financial assets – at fair value through profit or loss |
40,779 | 25,367 | – | 66,146 |
| Other invested assets | 28,371 | 36,104 | 1,119,315 | 1,183,790 |
| Short-term investments | 615,037 | 14,787 | – | 629,824 |
| Total financial assets measured at fair value | 8,304,479 | 14,862,686 | 1,124,046 | 24,291,211 |
| Other liabilities | – | 42,200 | 52,438 | 94,638 |
| Total financial liabilities measured at fair value | – | 42,200 | 52,438 | 94,638 |
Fair value hierarchy of financial instruments recognised at fair value
The classification of financial instruments according to the fair value hierarchy is regularly reviewed. In the period under review financial instruments with a fair value of EUR 148.5 million were no longer allocable to level 1 but rather to level 2. The reclassification was necessary owing to the reduced liquidity of the instruments. Financial instruments with a fair value of EUR 82.2 million, which in the previous year were recognised as level 2 instruments, were allocated to level 1 in the current reporting period. The reclassifications affected solely fixed-income securities carried as available for sale. The reallocation amounts stated refer to the carrying value of the investments recognised at the beginning of the period.
The following table provides a reconciliation of the fair values of financial instruments included in level 3 at the beginning of the period with the fair values as at the balance sheet date.
| in EUR thousand | 1.1. –30.9.2013 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fixed-income securities |
Equities, equity funds and other variable-yield se curities |
Other invested assets |
Other liabilities | |
| Net book value at 1 January of the year under review |
27,329 | 8 | 1,061,953 | 54,812 |
| Currency translation at 1 January | (469) | – | (15,711) | – |
| Net book value after currency translation | 26,860 | 8 | 1,046,242 | 54,812 |
| Changes in consolidated group | (7,276) | – | (8,973) | – |
| Income and expenses | ||||
| recognised in the statement of income | 1,071 | – | (3,774) | 1,079 |
| recognised directly in shareholders' equity | – | – | 30,066 | – |
| Additions | – | – | 159,257 | (2,565) |
| Disposals | 16,522 | – | 102,061 | (407) |
| Transfers to level 3 | – | – | – | – |
| Transfers from level 3 | – | – | – | – |
| Currency translation at 30 September of the year under review |
590 | – | (1,442) | (1,295) |
| Net book value at 30 September of the year under review |
4,723 | 8 | 1,119,315 | 52,438 |
The breakdown of income and expenses recognised in the statement of income in the reporting period in connection with financial instruments assigned to level 3 is as follows.
| in EUR thousand | 1.1. –30.9.2013 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Fixed-income securities |
Other invested assets |
Other liabilities | |
| Total in the financial year | |||
| Unrealised gains and losses | 1,071 | (297) | (1,079) |
| Total depreciation, impairments and appreciation of investments | – | (3,477) | – |
| Thereof attributable to financial instruments included in the port folio at 30 September of the year under review |
|||
| Unrealised gains and losses | 1,071 | (297) | (1,079) |
| Total depreciation, impairments and appreciation of investments | – | (3,477) | – |
If models are used to measure financial instruments included in level 3 under which the adoption of reasonable alternative inputs leads to a material change in fair value, IFRS 7 "Financial Instruments: Disclosures" requires disclosure of the effects of these alternative assumptions. Of the assets-side financial instruments included in level 3 with fair values of altogether EUR 1,124.0 million (EUR 1,089.3 million) as at the balance sheet date, Hannover Re measures financial instruments with a volume of EUR 1,065.9 million (EUR 990.4 million) using the net asset value method, in respect of which alternative inputs within the meaning of the standard cannot reasonably be established. For the remaining financial instruments included in level 3 with a volume of EUR 58.1 million (EUR 98.9 million), the effects of alternative inputs and assumptions are immaterial.
Shareholders' equity is shown as a separate component of the financial statement in accordance with IAS 1 "Presentation of Financial Statements" and subject to IAS 32 "Financial Instruments: Disclosure and Presentation" in conjunction with IAS 39 "Financial Instruments: Recognition and Measurement". The change in shareholders' equity comprises not only the net income deriving from the statement of income but also the changes in the value of asset and liability items not recognised in the statement of income.
The common shares (share capital of the parent company) amount to EUR 120,597,134.00. They are divided into 120,597,134 voting and dividend-bearing registered no-par value shares. The shares are fully paid up. Each share carries an equal voting right and an equal dividend entitlement.
Non-controlling interests in the shareholders' equity of the subsidiaries amounted to EUR 636.8 million (EUR 681.7 million) as at the balance sheet date. They were principally attributable to non-controlling interests in the shareholders' equity of E+S Rückversicherung AG in an amount of EUR 616.6 million (EUR 648.2 million).
Authorised capital of up to EUR 60,299 thousand is available with a time limit of 3 May 2015. The subscription right of shareholders may be excluded with the consent of the Supervisory Board. New, registered no-par-value shares may be issued on one or more occasions for contributions in cash or kind. Of the total amount, up to EUR 1,000 thousand may be used to issue employee shares.
In addition, conditional capital of up to EUR 60,299 thousand is available. It can be used to grant shares to holders of convertible bonds and bonds with warrants as well as to holders of participating bonds with conversion rights and warrants and has a time limit of 2 May 2016.
The Executive Board is authorised – with the consent of the Supervisory Board – to acquire treasury shares of up to 10% of the existing share capital. The authorisation is limited until 3 May 2015.
The Annual General Meeting of Hannover Rück SE resolved on 7 May 2013 that a dividend of EUR 2.60 and a bonus of EUR 0.40 per share should be paid for the 2012 financial year. This corresponds to a total distribution of EUR 361.8 million (EUR 253.3 million).
IAS 1 requires separate disclosure of treasury shares in shareholders' equity. As part of this year's employee share option plan Hannover Rück SE acquired altogether 18,750 (23,160) treasury shares during the second quarter of 2013 and delivered them to eligible employees at preferential conditions. These shares are blocked until 31 May 2017. This transaction resulted in an expense of EUR 0.4 million, which was recognised under personnel expenditure, as well as a negligible increase in retained earnings recognised in equity. The company was no longer in possession of treasury shares as at 30 September 2013.
The decrease in the other reserves arising out of currency translation, which is recognised in equity, was attributable in an amount of EUR 42.8 million to the translation of long-term debt or loans with no maturity date extended to Group companies and branches abroad.
| in EUR thousand | 1.1. –30.9.2013 | 1.1. –30.9.2012 |
|---|---|---|
| Regional origin | ||
| Germany | 1,016,424 | 920,023 |
| United Kingdom | 1,932,126 | 1,937,106 |
| France | 435,323 | 439,767 |
| Other | 1,326,571 | 1,424,967 |
| Europe | 4,710,444 | 4,721,863 |
| USA | 2,512,056 | 2,375,213 |
| Other | 537,546 | 487,866 |
| North America | 3,049,602 | 2,863,079 |
| Asia | 1,230,796 | 1,116,902 |
| Australia | 594,549 | 602,630 |
| Australasia | 1,825,345 | 1,719,532 |
| Africa | 339,428 | 387,554 |
| Other | 613,085 | 603,938 |
| Total | 10,537,904 | 10,295,966 |
| in EUR thousand | 1.1. –30.9.2013 | 1.1. –30.9.2012 |
|---|---|---|
| Income from real estate | 47,174 | 35,549 |
| Dividends | 1,936 | 1,779 |
| Interest income | 732,203 | 775,718 |
| Other income | (238) | 8,938 |
| Ordinary investment income | 781,075 | 821,984 |
| Profit or loss on shares in associated companies | 9,812 | 5,315 |
| Appreciation | 261 | 858 |
| Realised gains on investments | 121,462 | 183,959 |
| Realised losses on investments | 24,049 | 33,413 |
| Unrealised gains and losses on investments | (18,796) | 61,030 |
| Impairments on real estate | 10,056 | 7,981 |
| Impairments on equity securities | 3 | 2,205 |
| Impairments on fixed-income securities | – | 338 |
| Impairments on participating interests and other financial assets | 3,595 | 5,803 |
| Other investment expenses | 70,526 | 62,208 |
| Net income from assets under own management | 785,585 | 961,198 |
| Interest income on funds withheld and contract deposits | 350,188 | 326,192 |
| Interest expense on funds withheld and contract deposits | 82,558 | 78,628 |
| Total investment income | 1,053,215 | 1,208,762 |
The impairments totalling EUR 3.6 million (EUR 8.5 million) were attributable in the period under review in an amount of EUR 3.5 million (EUR 5.3 million) to the area of alternative investments – specifically, exclusively to private equity investments. No impairments (EUR 2.2 million) were recognised on equities or equity funds whose fair value had fallen significantly – i.e. by at least 20% – or for a prolonged period – i.e. for at least nine months – below acquisition cost. Nor were any impairments recognised on structured fixed-income securities or other fixed-income securities (EUR 0.3 million). These write-downs contrasted with write-ups of EUR 0.3 million (EUR 0.9 million) on investments written down in previous periods. The portfolio did not contain any overdue, unadjusted assets as at the balance sheet date since overdue securities are written down immediately.
| in EUR thousand | 1.1. –30.9.2013 | 1.1. –30.9.2012 |
|---|---|---|
| Fixed-income securities – held to maturity | 85,816 | 110,320 |
| Fixed-income securities – loans and receivables | 90,329 | 90,779 |
| Fixed-income securities – available for sale | 540,594 | 548,134 |
| Financial assets – at fair value through profit or loss | 736 | 2,678 |
| Other | 14,728 | 23,807 |
| Total | 732,203 | 775,718 |
Hannover Re's portfolio contained derivative financial instruments as at the balance sheet date in the form of forward exchange contracts predominantly taken out to hedge cash flows from reinsurance contracts. The resulting liabilities of EUR 7.3 million (31 December 2012: EUR 16.8 million) were recognised under other liabilities.
Forward exchange contracts with positive fair values of EUR 11.9 million (31 December 2012: none) were recognised under other financial assets at fair value through profit or loss.
Hannover Re holds derivative financial instruments to hedge interest rate risks from loans connected with the financing of real estate; these gave rise to recognition of other liabilities in an amount of EUR 1.4 million (31 December 2012: EUR 3.9 million).
Derivative financial instruments in connection with reinsurance
Certain reinsurance treaties meet criteria which require application of the prescriptions in IFRS 4 governing embedded derivatives. These accounting regulations require that derivatives embedded in reinsurance contracts be separated from the underlying insurance contract ("host contract") according to the conditions specified in IFRS 4 and IAS 39 and recognised separately at fair value in accordance with IAS 39. Fluctuations in the fair value of the derivative components are to be recognised in income in subsequent periods.
On this basis Hannover Re reported as financial assets at fair value through profit or loss technical derivatives in an amount of EUR 50.8 million as at 30 September 2013 (31 December 2012: EUR 47.7 million) that were separated from the underlying transaction and measured at fair value.
In addition, liabilities from derivatives in connection with the technical account totalling EUR 63.2 million (31 December 2012: EUR 60.9 million) were recognised under other liabilities as at the balance sheet date.
Of this amount, EUR 52.4 million (31 December 2012: EUR 54.8 million) is attributable to a number of transactions in the life and health reinsurance business group that are to be classified as derivative financial instruments. Under these transactions Hannover Re companies offer their contracting parties coverage for risks from possible future payment obligations arising out of hedging instruments. The payment obligations result from contractually defined events and relate to the development of an underlying group of primary insurance Hannover Re holds derivative financial instruments to hedge inflation risks associated with the loss reserves. These transactions resulted in the recognition of other financial assets at fair value through profit or loss in an amount of EUR 3.5 million (31 December 2012: EUR 13.1 million) as well as other liabilities in an amount of EUR 22.6 million (31 December 2012: EUR 4.9 million).
The net changes in the fair value of the aforementioned instruments resulted in a charge of EUR 18.9 million to the result of the period under review (30 September 2012: EUR 8.7 million).
contracts with statutory reserving requirements. The contracts are to be classified and recognised as stand-alone credit derivatives pursuant to IAS 39. These instruments gave rise to a charge against investment income in an amount of EUR 1.1 million (30 September 2012: none).
Of the derivatives carried on the assets side, fair values of EUR 43.9 million (31 December 2012: EUR 39.8 million) were attributable as at the balance sheet date to derivatives embedded in "modified coinsurance" and "coinsurance funds withheld" (ModCo) reinsurance treaties.
Within the scope of the accounting of ModCo reinsurance treaties, under which securities deposits are held by the ceding companies and payments rendered on the basis of the income from certain securities of the ceding company, the interestrate risk elements are clearly and closely related to the underlying reinsurance arrangements. Embedded derivatives consequently result solely from the credit risk of the underlying securities portfolio. Hannover Re calculates the fair value of the embedded derivatives in ModCo treaties using the market information available on the valuation date on the basis of a "credit spread" method. Under this method the derivative is valued at zero on the date when the contract commences and its value then fluctuates over time according to changes in the credit spreads of the securities.
The result from ModCo derivatives as at 30 September 2013 amounted to EUR 5.2 million before tax (30 September 2012: EUR 45.8 million).
Structured transactions were entered into in the life and health reinsurance business group in order to finance statutory reserves (so-called Triple-X or AXXX reserves) of US ceding companies. In each case such structures necessitate the involvement of a special purpose entity. The special purpose entities carry extreme mortality risks securitised by the cedant above a contractually defined retention and transfer these risks by way of a fixed/floating swap to a member company of the Hannover Re Group. The total amount of the contractually agreed capacities of the transactions is equivalent to EUR 1,111.3 million (EUR 1,137.9 million); an amount equivalent to EUR 843.1 million (EUR 848.1 million) had been taken up as at the balance sheet date. The variable payments to the special purpose entities that are guaranteed by Hannover Re cover their payment obligations. By way of compensation agreements Hannover Rück SE is reimbursed by the parent companies of the cedants for payments resulting from the swaps in the event of a claim.
IAS 24 "Related Party Disclosures" defines related parties as group entities of a common parent, associated entities, legal entities under the influence of key management personnel and the key management personnel of the entity itself. Transactions between Hannover Re and its subsidiaries, which are to be regarded as related parties, were eliminated through consolidation and are therefore not discussed in the notes to the consolidated financial statement. In the period under review the following significant business relations existed with related parties.
HDI Haftpflichtverband der Deutschen Industrie V.a.G. (HDI) holds an unchanged majority interest of 50.22% in Hannover Rück SE through Talanx AG.
With effect from the 1997 financial year onwards all new business and renewals written on the German market have been the responsibility of E+S Rückversicherung AG, while Hannover Rück SE has handled foreign markets. Internal retrocession arrangements ensure that the percentage breakdown of the business applicable to the previously existing underwriting partnership is largely preserved between these companies.
Within the contractually agreed framework Talanx Asset Management GmbH performs investment and asset management services for Hannover Re and some of its subsidiaries. Assets in a special fund are managed by Ampega Investment GmbH. Talanx Immobilien Management GmbH performs services for Hannover Re under a management contract.
Under IAS 39 these transactions are to be recognised at fair value as financial guarantees. To this end Hannover Re uses the net method, according to which the present value of the agreed fixed swap premiums is netted with the present value of the guarantee commitment. The fair value on initial recognition therefore amounted to zero. The higher of the fair value and the amount carried as a provision on the liabilities side pursuant to IAS 37 is recognised at the point in time when utilisation is considered probable. This was not the case as at the balance sheet date. In this case the reimbursement claims from the compensation agreements are to be capitalised separately from and up to the amount of the provision.
Companies belonging to the Talanx Group granted the Hannover Re Group insurance protection inter alia in the areas of public liability, building, group accident and business travel collision insurance. Divisions of Talanx AG also performed services for us in the areas of taxes and general administration. All transactions were effected at usual market conditions.
The Hannover Re Group provides reinsurance protection for the HDI Group. To this extent, numerous underwriting business relations exist with related parties in Germany and abroad which are not included in Hannover Re's consolidation. This includes business both assumed and ceded at usual market conditions.
Talanx Reinsurance Broker AG grants Hannover Rück SE and E+S Rückversicherung AG a preferential position as reinsurers of cedants within the Talanx Group. In addition, Hannover Rück SE and E+S Rückversicherung AG are able to participate in the protection covers on the retention of Group cedants and share in the protection afforded by them. In certain circumstances Hannover Rück SE and E+S Rückversicherung AG are obliged to assume unplaced shares of the reinsurance of Group cedants from Talanx Reinsurance Broker AG.
The major reinsurance relationships with related parties in the period under review are listed in the following table.
| in EUR thousand | 30.9.2013 | 30.9.2012 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Premium | Underwriting result |
Premium | Underwriting result |
|
| Business assumed | ||||
| Non-life reinsurance | 378,276 | 49,381 | 332,398 | 24,124 |
| Life and health reinsurance | 139,535 | 16,739 | 156,945 | 11,673 |
| 517,811 | 66,120 | 489,343 | 35,797 | |
| Business ceded | ||||
| Non-life reinsurance | (13,126) | (7,057) | (14,687) | 9,037 |
| Life and health reinsurance | (40,849) | (7,825) | (37,223) | (7,245) |
| (53,975) | (14,882) | (51,910) | 1,792 | |
| Total | 463,836 | 51,238 | 437,433 | 37,589 |
The Group companies E+S Rückversicherung AG, Hannover Finance (Luxembourg) S.A., Hannover Re (Ireland) Plc and Hannover Re (Bermuda) Ltd. invested in previous years in a nominal amount of altogether EUR 150.0 million in a bearer debenture of Talanx AG with a maturity date of 8 July 2013 and a coupon of 5.43%. Talanx AG redeemed this bearer debenture in the first quarter of 2013. The redemption gave rise to realised gains on investments of EUR 2.8 million before tax for Hannover Re Group. In the context of a new bond issue by Talanx AG the Group companies Hannover Rück SE and E+S Rückversicherung AG invested in a nominal amount of EUR 47.0 million in the issued bearer debt, which has a coupon of 3.125%. The carrying amount of the instrument, which is recognised under fixed-income securities held to maturity, was EUR 47.9 million including accrued interest of EUR 0.9 million.
The average number of staff employed at the companies included in the consolidated financial statement of the Hannover Re Group during the period under review was 2,365 (average in 2012: 2,263).
As at the balance sheet date altogether 2,406 (2,312) staff were employed by the Hannover Re Group, with 1,203 (1,164) employed in Germany and 1,203 (1,148) working for the consolidated Group companies abroad.
Calculation of the earnings per share
| 1.1. –30.9.2013 | 1.1. –30.9.20121 | |
|---|---|---|
| Group net income in EUR thousand | 613,179 | 670,797 |
| Weighted average of issued shares | 120,596,134 | 120,596,791 |
| Basic earnings per share in EUR | 5.08 | 5.56 |
| Diluted earnings per share in EUR | 5.08 | 5.56 |
1 Adjusted on the basis of IAS 8
The earnings per share is calculated by dividing the net income attributable to the shareholders of Hannover Rück SE by the weighted average number of shares outstanding within the period under review.
Neither in the period under review nor in the previous reporting period were there any dilutive effects.
On the basis of this year's employee share option plan Hannover Rück SE acquired treasury shares in the course of the second quarter of 2013 and sold them to eligible employees. The weighted average number of shares does not include 18,750 (23,160) treasury shares pro rata temporis for the period from 13 to 15 May 2013. For further details please see our comments in Section 5.2 "Shareholders' equity, non-controlling interests and treasury shares".
There were no other extraordinary components of income which should have been recognised or disclosed separately in the calculation of the earnings per share.
The earnings per share could potentially be diluted in future through the issue of shares or subscription rights from the authorised or conditional capital.
Hannover Rück SE has placed four subordinated debts on the European capital market through its subsidiary Hannover Finance (Luxembourg) S.A. Hannover Rück SE has secured by subordinated guarantee both the debt issued in 2004, the volume of which amounts to EUR 750.0 million, and the debts from the 2005, 2010 and 2012 financial years in amounts of EUR 500.0 million each. The fair value of the aforementioned bonds as at 30 September 2013 was EUR 2,383.5 million (31 December 2012: EUR 2,476.4 million).
The guarantees given by Hannover Rück SE for the subordinated debts attach if the issuer fails to render payments due under the bonds. The guarantees cover the relevant bond volumes as well as interest due until the repayment dates. Given the fact that interest on the bonds is partly dependent on the capital market rates applicable at the interest payment dates (floating rates), the maximum undiscounted amounts that can be called cannot be estimated with sufficient accuracy. Hannover Rück SE does not have any rights of recourse outside the Group with respect to the guarantee payments.
As security for technical liabilities to our US clients, we have established two trust accounts (master trust and supplemental trust) in the United States. They amounted to EUR 2,821.1 million (EUR 2,855.7 million) and EUR 18.2 million (EUR 11.9 million) respectively as at the balance sheet date. The securities held in the trust accounts are shown as available-for-sale investments. In addition, we furnished further collateral to ceding companies in an amount of EUR 652.0 million (EUR 549.3 million) in the form of so-called "single trust funds".
As part of our business activities we hold collateral available outside the United States in various blocked custody accounts and trust accounts, the total amount of which in relation to the Group's major companies was EUR 2,451.8 million (EUR 2,314.4 million) as at the balance sheet date.
The securities held in the blocked custody accounts and trust accounts are recognised predominantly as available-for-sale investments.
As security for our technical liabilities, various financial institutions have furnished sureties for our company in the form of letters of credit. The total amount as at the balance sheet date was EUR 3,098.6 million (EUR 3,343.0 million).
In addition, we keep own investments with a book value of EUR 54.8 million (EUR 67.3 million) in blocked custody accounts as collateral provided under existing derivative transactions. We received collateral with a fair value of EUR 10.0 million (EUR 9.5 million) for existing derivative transactions.
For liabilities in connection with participating interests in real estate companies and real estate transactions the usual collateral under such transactions was furnished to various banks, the amount of which totalled EUR 483.0 million (EUR 288.3 million) as at the balance sheet date.
Outstanding capital commitments with respect to alternative investments exist on the part of the Group in an amount of EUR 639.0 million (EUR 575.9 million). These primarily involve as yet unfulfilled payment obligations from investment commitments given to private equity funds and venture capital firms.
The application of tax regulations may not have been resolved at the time when tax items are brought to account. The calculation of tax refund claims and tax liabilities is based on what we consider to be the regulations most likely to be applied in each case. The revenue authorities may, however, take a differing view, as a consequence of which additional tax liabilities could arise in the future.
Hannover Rück SE enters into contingent liabilities as part of its normal business operations. A number of reinsurance treaties concluded by Group companies with outside third parties include letters of comfort, guarantees or novation agreements under which the parent company guarantees the liabilities of the subsidiary in question or enters into the rights and obligations of the subsidiary under the treaties if particular constellations materialise.
Karl Steinle
Tel. +49 511 5604-1500 Fax +49 511 5604-1648 [email protected]
Gabriele Handrick Tel. +49 511 5604-1502 Fax +49 511 5604-1648 [email protected]
Julia Hartmann Tel. +49 511 5604-1529 Fax +49 511 5604-1648 [email protected]
Published by Hannover Rück SE
Karl-Wiechert-Allee 50 30625 Hannover, Germany Tel. +49 511 5604-0 Fax +49 511 5604-1188
Concept, design and realisation Whitepark GmbH&Co., Hamburg www.whitepark.de
LD Medien und Druckgesellschaft mbH, Hamburg Printed on paper from environmentally responsible, socially compatible and economically viable forest management
Building tools?
Free accounts include 100 API calls/year for testing.
Have a question? We'll get back to you promptly.