Vonovia SE

Investor Presentation • Apr 17, 2015

Deutsche Annington Immobilien SE

Bankhaus Lampe Deutschlandkonferenz Baden-Baden, April 16-17, 2015

Thomas Eisenlohr, Head of IR

© Deutsche Annington Immobilien SE Bankhaus Lampe Deutschlandkonferenz, Baden-Baden, April 16-17, 2015

Promised and delivered – the 2014 Highlights

2014: Another strong year with KPIs at top end of guidance or exceeding

• Like-for-like rental growth of 2.5%
• FFO1 increased 28.2% to € 286.6m
• NAV/share plus 6.0% to € 24.22
• Proposed dividend up 11.4% to € 0.78/share

Successful execution of main work streams

• Cost saving program leads to significant cost per unit decline of 9% to € 754
• Strong rise of modernisation capex to € 172m
• Acquisitions of DeWAG and Vitus are fully integrated with solid KPI contribution
• Confirmed positive outlook for 2015 (Deutsche Annington stand-alone)

GAGFAH transaction:

• Closing imminent
• Governance structure established
• Top teams at board and management level formed
• Integration starting next week
• First combined Q1 reporting on June 1st with detailed report on progress

The positive performance is driven by all strategic pillars

Improvement of all KPIs in 2014 FFO 1/share +5.9%, NAV/share +6.0%

FFO 1 ex. maintenance (€m)

2) Based on average number of units over the period 1) Based on number of shares as of 31 Dec 2013 (224.2 m) and 31 Dec 2014 (271.6 m)

Improvement of all KPIs in 2014 Rents up 2.5%, vacancy down to 3.4%

Adjusted EBITDA (€m) Adj. EBITDA Rental Adj. EBITDA Sales 429.5 503.9 442.7 503.9 36,9 50,1 27,7 50,1 2010 2014 2013 2014 470.4 554.0 466.4 2.468 2.709 Adj. EBITDA Rental/unit ¹ (€) 554.0

1) Based on average number of units over the period

258

AFFO

FFO is significantly up in all categories

FFO evolution (€m)	2014	2013		FFO breakdown (€m)
(€m)	2014 554.0	2013 470.4	554					FFO 1 excl. maintenance
Adjusted EBITDA (-) Interset expense FFO	-209.3	-210.7
(-) Current income taxes	-8.0	-8.5						432
(=) FFO 2	336.7	251.2				337
(-) Adjusted EBITDA Sales	-50.1	-27.7		(209)	(8)		(50)	287
(=) FFO 1	286.6	223.5							(28)
(-) Capitalised maintenance	-28.3	-20.0
(=) AFFO	258.3	203.5
(+) Capitalised maintenance	28.3	20.0
(+) Expenses for maintenance	145.1	136.5	Adjusted	Interest	Current	FFO 2	Adjusted	FFO 1	Capitalised
(=) FFO 1 excl. maintenance	431.7	360.0	EBITDA	expense FFO	income taxes		EBITDA Sales		maintenance

Comments

• All FFOs with significant positive development
• Top-line growth from rental increases and acquisition at a better cost basis power positive development
• Additionally, strong positive impact from privatisation

Steady NAV growth

Comments

• Capital increase position is net of transaction costs
• Deferred tax calculation has been adjusted to comply with EPRA best practise recommendation – see appendix for details

Note: Rounding errors may occur

Long-term and well-balanced maturity profile

KPIs as of Dec 31, 2014
	Actual	Target
LTV (nominal)	49.7%	<50%*
Unencumbered assets in %	50%	≥ 50%
Global ICR	2.6x	Ongoing optimisation with
Financing cost	3.2%	most economical funding
		*medium term

2014 results at top end of guidance or exceeding

	Feb. 2014	Sep. 2014*	2014
	Guidance	Guidance	Results
L-f-l rental growth	2.3 – 2.6%	2.3 – 2.6%	2.5%
Modernisation program	€ 150m	€ 160m	€ 171.7m
Disposals (privatisation)	~1,800 units	2,100-2,200 units	2,238 units
Step-up on FMV (privatisation)	20%	30-35%	37.6%
FFO 1	€ 250 – 265m	€ 280 – 285m	€ 286.6m
Proposed dividend/share		€ 0.78	€ 0.78

* Including pro-rata contribution of acquisitions, excluding disposal of Vitus NRW-Portfolio

	Results 2014	Outlook 2015 (DAIG stand alone)
l-f-l rental growth	2.5%	2.6 – 2.8%
Rental income	€ 789.3m	€ 880 – 900m
FFO 1	€ 286.6m	€ 340 – 360m
NAV/share1)	€ 24.22	€ 24 – 25
Modernisation program	€ 171.7m	> € 200m
Planned disposals (privatisation)	2,238 units	~1,600 units
Step up on FMV (privatisation)	37.6%	~30%
Dividend policy	78 cent/share	~70% of FFO1

¹⁾

^• Includes adjustment of NAV calculation to more strictly reflect EPRA Best Practices Recommendations;

^• NAV 2015 does not include any potential yield compression in year end fair value assessment;

^• Based on existing capital structure

Substantial rise in maintenance guarantees the sustainability of our portfolio's rental growth capacity

Successful 2014 cost saving program leads to a significant cost per unit improvement

• Increased cost saving program lifts savings up to ~€ 76/unit (9% yoy improvement)
• Effect of acquisitions in 2014 minor, as units count pro rata, full effect from 2015 onwards

Definition: (Rental Income – EBITDA Rental adjusted + Maintenance) / average # units Rental EBITDA adjusted to fit Deutsche Annington definition

Proven track record of the modernisation program Promising start into the year 2015

2014 substantially over-delivered & more to come

• Over-delivered on promise at IPO to substantially increase investments to ~€ 150m p.a.
• Expected 2015 investment volume: >€ 200m
• 2015 contains both a steady investment flow to Deutsche Annington legacy portfolio as well as significant investments in acquired portfolios
• Yield commitment (unlevered ~7%) and investment focus (energy & demographic change) remain unchanged
• Initial yield from the 2014 program at 7.5% for the apartments already let
• Preparations for all projects with construction start in Q1/2015 well advanced

^*yield forecasted depending on new rents after modernisation

Significant fair value step-up on privatisations and non-core disposals

• Privatisation volume slightly below previous year, but above plan

• Fair value step-up increased due to good market environment and sales strength

• Non-core disposals 2013 driven by sale of a portfolio of 2,100 units

• Disposals with a premium to fair value demonstrates sales strength

Successful start of the bathroom program

Status update

• Since initiation in August 2014, already ~400 projects have been executed
• Average investment of € 6.7k
• Fixed price agreed with TGS, while TGS suggests execution dates
• After start with first roadshow container in August 2014, a second container has been set in place in February 2015
• Y-t-d >350 tenants have already committed their interest for the 2015 program
• Customer satisfaction has significantly increased

More satisfied tenants with yields significantly above the standard modernisation measures

Smart-Submetering – the next promising pilot project

Smart-submetering - What´s it about?

• Consumption of heat and water has to be tracked (unit by unit). Currently, we have contracts with several service providers, delivering us data once a year
• We aim to replace the service provider and insource real-time metering by a Deutsche Annington subsidiary
• We are able to settle the utility bill every month or shortly after a tenant leaves
• It creates a win-win situation for tenants and Deutsche Annington (lower cost, better visibility, etc)
• First pilot in 1,000 flats in Bergkamen with 6,000 meters and 25 modems in place
• Technical feasibility is proven: consumption data measured manually and automatically are identical
• Business case on track, roll-out is now in detailed planning phase

Pilot implemented

• Measuring of consumption of Water and Heat (Sub-Metering)
• 'Smart': Utilize intelligent online Metering technology
• Evaluate value levers from insourcing

We are screening the market for potential acquisitions, but with a very selective approach

If it comes to an acquisition, we are a highly appreciated and reliable partner

• We offer transaction security. If we sign, we close as well in a relatively short timeframe
• Best-in-class financing strategy with fast access to a comprehensive set of funding tools
• Our German-wide presence is a competitive advantage ("You don't easily find portfolios of 5,000 units in one city")
• We have a dedicated and well experienced internal M&A team
• Our processes are standardised and fast
• Our deal criteria are transparent

Every potential acquisition is monitored by a dedicated process, thus keeping us highly disciplined

• Our return matrix and portfolio segmentation are powerful tools to make an early decision about the strategic fit of an offered portfolio
• The "cage" keeps us highly disciplined and prevents us from overpaying - a high risk in current markets

We are well prepared for the GAGFAH integration

We are well prepared…

• 2014 acquisitions of DeWAG and Vitus are fully integrated and financed – smooth and faster than planned
• Systems and processes are accessed and now suitable for any integration
• Hence, everything needed for the integration and funding of GAGFAH has been successfully tested
• We have already achieved the first important milestones of the GAGFAH transaction:
  • Board and senior management team selected
  • Financing structure kicked-off with perpetual hybrid bond issuance in December 2014

…to go the extra mile, fast.

• Next Steps 2015
  • Start of integration
  • Assimilation of IT-structure
  • Segmentation of combined portfolio
  • Execution of funding strategy
  • Achievement of first synergy targets
• Upcoming dates 2015
  • April 30th : AGM
  • June 1 st : Combined Q1 Results with detailed update
  • June 15th & 16th : Capital Markets Day
  • August 19th : Combined H1 results
• 2016 Outlook
  • Last mile on synergies

Summary

• Promised and delivered: 2014 was an outstanding year for Deutsche Annington
  • Excellent operational performance continued leading to all major KPIs at or above guidance
  • Innovative finance structure demonstrated by first hybrid issuance in German residential
• We strictly follow our strategy
  • Value enhancing portfolio management
  • Sustainable efficiency improvement
  • Recent transactions fulfilling our strict criteria and offering operational scale effects
• We are ready to go: 2015 will be another positively exciting year

Appendix

© Deutsche Annington Immobilien SE Bankhaus Lampe Deutschlandkonferenz, Baden-Baden, April 16-17, 2015

Portfolio review leads to a slightly adjusted segmention

1) Note: Percentage figures denote share of total fair value, as of 31 December 2014 and 31 December 2013

FY 2014 key figures

Key Figures
in €m	2014	2013	Change in (%)
Residential units k	203,028	175,258	15.8
Rental income	789.3	728.0	8.4
Vacancy rate %	3.4	3.5	-0.1 pp
Monthly in-place rent€/sqm (like-for-like)	5.55	5.40	2.5
Adjusted EBITDA Rental	503.9	442.7	13.8
Adj. EBITDA Rental/unit in €	2,709	2,468	9.7
Income from disposal of properties	287.3	353.5	-18.7
Adjusted EBITDA Sales	50.1	27.7	80.9
Adjusted EBITDA	554.0	470.4	17.8
FFO 1	286.6	223.5	28.2
FFO 2	336.7	251.2	34.0
FFO 1 before maintenance	431.7	360.0	19.9
AFFO	258.3	203.5	26.9
Fair value market properties	12,759.1	10,326.7	23.6
NAV	6,578.0	5,123.4	28.4
LTV, in%	49.7	49.0	1.4
FFO 1 / share in €1	1.06	1.00	5.9
NAV / share in €1	24.22	22.85	6.0

1) Based on the shares qualifying for a dividend on the reporting date Dec 31, 2013: 240,242,425 and Dec 31, 2014: 271,622,425

Like-for-like rental growth in 2014 accelerated to 2.5% (2013 = 1.9%)

A DEUTSCHE
ZANNINGTON

Rent increase type	L-f-l rental growth 2014
Sitting tenants (non-subsidised)	+0.8%
Sitting tenants (subsidised)	+0.3%
New rentals	+0.5%
Subtotal excl. modernisation	+1.6%
Sales effect	+0.0%
Total incl. Sales	+1.6%
Modernisation	+0.9%
Total incl. Mod and Sales	+2.5%

Rounded figures

FY 2014: Strong growth in adjusted EBITDA rental and adjusted EBITDA sales

Bridge to Adjusted EBITDA Rental segment

(€m)	2014	2013
Profit for the period	409.7	484.2
Net interest result	274.9	288.3
Income taxes	179.4	205.4
Depreciation	7.4	6.8
Net income from fair value adjustments of
investment properties	-371.1	-553.7
EBITDA IFRS	500.3	431.0
Non-recurring items	54.0	48.4
Period adjustments	-0.3	-9.0
Adjusted EBITDA	554.0	470.4
Adjusted EBITDA Rental	503.9	442.7
Adjusted EBITDA Sales	50.1	27.7

(€m)	2014	2013
Average number of units over the period	186,013	179,354
Rental income	789.3	728.0
Maintenance	-145.1	-136.5
Operating costs	-140.3	-148.8
Adjusted EBITDA Rental	503.9	442.7
Sales segment
(€m)	2014	2013
Number of units sold	4,081	6,720
Income from disposal of properties	287.3	353.5
Carrying amount of properties sold	-243.4	-325.8
Revaluation of assets held for sale	25.1	24.3
Profit on disposal of properties (IFRS)	69.0	52.0
Revaluation (realised) of assets held for sale	-18.6	-15.3
Revaluation from disposal of assets held for sale	24.8	15.3
Adjusted Profit from disposal of properies	68.7	27.7
Selling costs	-18.6	-15.3
Adjusted EBITDA Sales	50.1	27.7

Evolution of Adjusted EBITDA (€m)

Very solid EBITDA development driven by both rental und sales business

• The sales result reflects just a very strong performance doubled results at lower number of units sold.
• The rental EBITDA is affected by the contribution from acquisitions, underlined by a strong performance.

FY 2014: P&L development

			Change
(€m)	2014	2013	(€m)	%
Income from property letting	1,138.4	1,048.3	90.1	8.6
Rental income	789.3	728.0	61.3	8.4
Ancillary costs	349.1	320.3	28.8	9.0
Other income from property management	18.2	19.3	-1.1	-5.7
Income from property management	1,156.6	1,067.6	89.0	8.3
Income from sale of properties	287.3	353.5	-66.2	-18.7
Carrying amount of properties sold	-243.4	-325.8	82.4	-25.3
Revaluation of assets held for sale	25.1	24.3	0.8	3.3
Profit on disposal of properties	69.0	52.0	17.0	32.7
Net income from fair value adjustments of
investment properties	371.1	553.7	-182.6	-33.0
Capitalised internal modernisation expenses	85.6	42.0	43.6	103.8
Cost of materials	-542.6	-502.8	-39.8	7.9
Expenses for ancillary costs	-344.4	-324.9	-19.5	6.0
Expenses for maintenance	-141.0	-119.7	-21.3	17.8
Other costs of purchased goods and services	-57.2	-58.2	1.0	-1.7
Personnel expenses	-184.6	-172.1	-12.5	7.3
Depreciation and amortisation	-7.4	-6.8	-0.6	8.8
Other operating income	65.3	45.8	19.5	42.6
Other operating expenses	-152.4	-104.2	-48.2	46.3
Financial income	8.8	14.0	-5.2	-37.1
Financial expenses	-280.3	-299.6	19.3	-6.4
Profit before tax	589.1	689.6	-100.5	-14.6
Income tax	-179.4	-205.4	26.0	-12.7
Current income tax	-8.0	-8.5	0.5	-5.9
Other (incl. deferred tax)	-171.4	-196.9	25.5	-13.0
Profit for the period	409.7	484.2	-74.5	-15.4

P&L Comments

• Increase primarily driven by DeWAG and Vitus acquisition which accounted for € 65.6m in 2014
• Excluding acquisition effects, rental income remains relatively stable as sales effects are largely offset by higher Ø residential in-place rent per sqm and month (€ 5.55 vs. € 5.41) and lower vacancy rate
• Increase primarily driven by DeWAG and Vitus acquisitions which accounts for € 25.2m in 2014
• Excluding acquisition effects, income from ancillary cost increased by € 3.6m as the improved vacancy rate overcompensates reduced portfolio size
• More stringent profitability standards resulted in a significant reduction of units sold.
• However, this effect is more than offset by the positive market environment which results in higher sales prices and corresponding in higher fair value step-ups for properties sold.
• Result in 2014 is primarily due to yield compression effects, expiration of rent-restrictions and modernisation programme.
• Increase driven by capitalised services rendered by internal craftsmen organisation
• Increase reflects increasing portfolio size from latest acquisitions partly compensated by insourcing effects of our own caretaker organisation
• Increase primarily driven by higher expenses per sqm from € 11.93 in 2013 to € 12.23m combined with increased portfolio size

FY 2014: P&L development (cont'd)

P&L					Comments
			Change
(€m)	2014	2013	(€m)	%
Income from property letting	1,138.4	1,048.3	90.1	8.6
Rental income	789.3	728.0	61.3	8.4
Ancillary costs	349.1	320.3	28.8	9.0
Other income from property management	18.2	19.3	-1.1	-5.7
Income from property management	1,156.6	1,067.6	89.0	8.3
Income from sale of properties	287.3	353.5	-66.2	-18.7
Carrying amount of properties sold	-243.4	-325.8	82.4	-25.3
Revaluation of assets held for sale	25.1	24.3	0.8	3.3	acquisitions.
Profit on disposal of properties	69.0	52.0	17.0	32.7
Net income from fair value adjustments of
investment properties	371.1	553.7	-182.6	-33.0
Capitalised internal modernisation expenses	85.6	42.0	43.6	103.8
Cost of materials	-542.6	-502.8	-39.8	7.9
Expenses for ancillary costs	-344.4	-324.9	-19.5	6.0
Expenses for maintenance	-141.0	-119.7	-21.3	17.8
Other costs of purchased goods and services	-57.2	-58.2	1.0	-1.7
Personnel expenses	-184.6	-172.1	-12.5	7.3
Depreciation and amortisation	-7.4	-6.8	-0.6	8.8
Other operating income	65.3	45.8	19.5	42.6
Other operating expenses	-152.4	-104.2	-48.2	46.3
Financial income	8.8	14.0	-5.2	-37.1
Financial expenses	-280.3	-299.6	19.3	-6.4
Profit before tax	589.1	689.6	-100.5	-14.6
Income tax	-179.4	-205.4	26.0	-12.7
Current income tax	-8.0	-8.5	0.5	-5.9
Other (incl. deferred tax)	-171.4	-196.9	25.5	-13.0
Profit for the period	409.7	484.2	-74.5	-15.4

• Ramp-up of personnel from 2,935 to 3,850 employees leads to increased personnel expenses, primarily driven by the insourcing initiative of caretakers and craftsmen as well as latest acquisitions.
• Ongoing personnel cost per FTE decline as a significant share of new employees relates to our craftsmen or caretaker organisation

Increase results from reimbursement of transaction and integration costs related to the sale of the Leopard-Portfolio (€16m) and insurance payments from a storm in the second quarter of 2014.

• Increase mainly driven by consultants' and auditors' fees for DeWAG and Vitus acquisitions as well as provisions related to the Gagfah takeover.
• Substantial decrease due to lower interest rates and an improved financing structure

Reduction by decreasing income from fair value adjustments of investment properties

FY 2014: Balance sheet evolution

Overview			Comments
(€m)	Dec. 31, 2014	Dec. 31, 2013
Investment properties	12,687.2	10,266.4	Increase driven by acquisition of DeWAG 
Other non-current assets	292.8	86.2	(€1,066.3m), Vitus (€ 994.7m) as well as valuation
Total non-current assets	12,980.0	10,352.6	gains (based on DCF method) of € 371.1m
Cash and cash equivalents	1,564.8	547.8	December hybrid issuance has caused increased 
Other financial assets	2.0	2.1	cash position
Other current assets	212.4	190.3
Total current assets	1,779.2	740.2	Up due to the three capital increases of € 1,024m, as  well as profit for the period of € 401.4m;
Total assets	14,759.2	11,092.8	Counter effect: pay-out of dividend of € 168.2m 
Total equity attributable to DA shareholders	4,932.6	3,805.5
Equity attributable to hybrid capital investors	1,001.6	-	Hybrid bond issued in December 2014, considered as 
Non-controlling interests	28.0	12.5	equity under IFRS
Total equity	5,962.2	3,818.0
Provisions	422.1	342.6	New MTNs of €1,200m issued in 2014 
Trade payables	1.0	0.3	First consolidation of DeWAG and Vitus liabilities of 
Non derivative financial liabilities	6,539.5	5,396.0	€ 741.0m
Derivative financial liabilities	54.5	69.4	Redemption of € 1,051.1m 
Liabilities from finance leases	88.1	87.6
Liabilities to non-controlling interests	46.3	0.0
Other liabilities	8.6	9.8
Deferred tax liabilities	1,132.8	925.0	Increase in line with valuation gains from investment  properties
Total non-current liabilities	8,292.9	6,830.7
Provisions	211.3	148.6
Trade payables	51.5	47.6
Non derivative financial liabilities	125.3	198.8
Derivative financial liabilities	21.9	9.0
Liabilities from finance leases	4.4	4.3
Liabilities to non-controlling interests	7.5	0.0
Other liabilities	82.2	35.8
Total current liabilities	504.1	444.1
Total liabilities	8,797.0	7,274.8
Total equity and liabilities	14,759.2	11,092.8

Change in deferred tax recognition according to EPRA

• Referring to the EPRA "Best Practices Recommendations", equity effects caused by deferred taxes should be excluded in the EPRA NAV calculation if they are not expected to crystallise in normal circumstances. Usually, this should be the case for deferred taxes on property valuation surpluses.
• Historically DAIG used a simplified approach to fulfil this requirement. Not only the deferred taxes on properties but the total net of deferred tax liabilities and deferred tax assets were recognised and added to the shareholders equity.
• For FY 2014, DAIG has changed its recognition of deferred taxes to deferred taxes on property valuation surpluses (and on financial derivatives) only, with the following effect:

NAV Reconciliation	2013		2014
€m	old definition	new definition	old definition	new definition
DAIG Equity	3,805.5	3,805.5	4,932.6	4,932.6
Deferred tax on investment properties and assets held for sale	1,276.6	1,276.6	1,581.0	1,581.0
Fair value of derivatives	54.7	56.3	87.9	88.1
Deferred tax on derivatives	-15.0	-15.0	-23.7	-23.7
Other deferred tax	-339.6		-439.5
NAV	4,782.2	5,123.4	6,138.3	6,578.0

Overview of DAIG modernisation and maintenance split

DA Residential Portfolio Dec. 31, 2014
	Units		Area		Vacancy		In-Place Rent	Rent l-f-l*
Portfolio Segment	#	%	(´000 sqm)	%	Y-o-Y in %	€m	€/sqm	Y-o-Y in %
Operate	86,325	45	5,418	2.9	-0.1	351.2	5.56	1.8
Upgrade	51,901	25	3,259	2.7	-0.1	211.2	5.55	3.2
Optimise	34,320	12	2,175	2.7	0.6	152.9	6.03	3.7
Rental only	172,546	82	10,852	2.8	0.0	715.3	5.65	2.7
Privatise	21,530	12	1,466	4.6	-0.3	91.8	5.46	1.8
Non-Core	8,952	6	570	11.8	2.1	25.8	4.30	1.1
TOTAL	203,028	100	12,888	3.4	-0.1	832.9	5.58	2.5

* without DeWAG and Vitus

Rating and Bonds

Corporate investment grade rating

Rating agency	Rating	Outlook	Outlook Date
Standard & Poor's	BBB	Watch POS	1 Dec 2014

Bond ratings

3 years 2.125% Euro Bond	€ 700m	99.793%	2.125%	25 Jul 2016	BBB**
6 years 3.125% Eurobond	€ 600m	99.935%	3.125%	25 Jul 2019	BBB**
4 years 3.200% Yankee Bond	USD 750m	100.000%	3.200% (2.970%)*	2 Oct 2017	BBB**
10 years 5.000% Yankee Bond	USD 250m	98.993%	5.000 % (4.580%)*	2 Oct 2023	BBB**
8 years 3.625% EMTN	€ 500m	99.843%	3.625%	8 Oct 2021	BBB**
8 years 2.125% EMTN	€ 500m	99.412%	2.125%	9 Jul 2022	BBB**
60 years 4.625% Hybrid	€ 700m	99.782%	4.625%	8 Apr 2074	BB+**
pp 4.000% Hybrid	€ 1,000m	100.000%	4.000%	perpetual	BBB-***
* EUR-equivalent re-offer yield on credit w atch w ith positive oulook * preliminary rating

*** preliminary rating

We are well positioned in a favourable market environment

Source: Federal Statistical Office, Euroconstruct, ifo

Favourable household development in Germany (m)

Source: BBSR Raumordnungsprognose 2030. Projections based on 2009 numbers

Source: Schader Stiftung (Germany), Clameur (France), Association of Residential Letting Agents (UK)

Continuing supply / demand imbalance (units)

Source: Destatis, BBSR

Deutsche Annington at a glance

• Top 4 European real estate company¹ and the largest German residential firm²
• 203k (208k incl. Franconia) residential units well spread across Germany
• 97% (96% incl. Franconia) of portfolio by fair value located in Western Germany and Berlin (and 82% [81% incl. Franconia] of portfolio by fair value in states with strongest rental growth)
• Around 3.900 employees incl. own craftsmen organization with more than 2.000 employees
• Standardized processes and industrialized platform
• Best-in-class financing structure in the German real estate sector
• Dedicated portfolio strategy and investment program focused on value creation

¹By market cap; ² In listed German residential sector

We are able to reduce the effects of "Mietpreisbremse" by benefitting from our unique modernisation skills

• With our German-wide presence and the approach to offer affordable living, only very few of our assets are located in potential "high demand housing markets", where "Mietpreisbremse" might be applied
• Assessed potential risk of lost rental growth amounts to around 0.2% p.a.
• 1. Do nothing accept situation 2. Only "comprehensive, high-end-luxury" modernisations No option for Deutsche Annington, as not in line with our position of being "Germany's largest residential real estate manager" No option for Deutsche Annington, as it leads to growth stagnation general principle to offer `affordable living´. The only realistic scenario for Deutsche Annington due to the strategic advantage of TGS. 3. Shift strategy to portfolio privatisation only
  2. 1. Highest implementation probability through countrywide availability of craftsmen capacity
  3. 1. Cost efficiency and economies of scale result in lower costs for tenants and lead to higher acceptance of modernisation efforts

Although Deutsche Annington might be affected by the "Mietpreisbremse", it offers the opportunity to focus even stronger on our strategic advantage – socially accepted modernisation executed by TGS, our own craftsmen organisation.

4. Broaden and expand rent-related investments

No option for Deutsche Annington, as not in line with our

Our modernisation program is capitalising on mega-trends supported by German regulation

• Strong regulatory push at the EU level towards energy efficiency
• Supportive German regulatory framework allowing for rent increases following modernisation (up to 11% of energy modernisation cost)
• Public subsidised funding available to support energy efficiency investments

€ 500m investment opportunities identified € 300m investment opportunities identified¹

Attractive growth potential at ~7% unlevered yield, proven by our track-record

Source: European Commission, BBSR-Bevölkerungsprognose 2030

1) Including investments for senior living as well as investments in high demand markets

Investment Process

	Year 1	Year 2	Year 3
	Investment Definition & Decision
Heat insulation		Construction of vintage year 2
			Rent increases of vintage year 2
	Investment Definition & Decision
Heating system		Construction of vintage year 2
		Rent	increases of vintage year 2
	Investment Definition & Decision
Apartments		Construction of vintage year 2
		Rent increases of vintage	year 2

Imbalanced market structure provides opportunities

Total Returns 2009-2012

• Total return is the sum of current return and expected value growth
• Imbalanced market structure provides opportunities
• Growth is most crucial component
• But analyses of history shows – rent forecasts by external data providers are not reliable

Current return in %

Deutsche Annington's portfolio management approach (Deutsche Annington's analyses of Germany)

• We developed a framework to evaluate the housing market
• Growth is derived from basic demographic data and own estimates
• We will invest and acquire assets with above average returns and sell assets with low return
• We identified 10 cities with a priority for acquisitions

Current return in %

City Priority city for acquisitions

Active portfolio management approach pays off

All 2014 transactions perfectly enhance our portfolio – acquisitions as well as disposals

/DeWAG/Franconia comb

We implemented an efficient process to acquire smaller portfolios fast and smoothly (tactical acquisitions)

• With tactical acquisitions (≤ 500 units), we enlarge our transaction toolkit
• Our target is to refill reductions from privatisation sales by tactical acquisitions

• Standardised and lean "fast track" process (2-4 weeks) for tactical acquisitions implemented
• Low complexity leads to acceptable administrative cost
• Best use of regional market knowledge

• Requirements for strategic fit:

  • Asset deal
  • Focus region in line with growth-return matrix
  • Significant Dt. Annington portfolio close by
  • Property strategy (rental only)

• Lean and tailored process to drive tactical acquisitions

• First acquisitions as testing balloon in 2014, steady deal flow from 2015 onwards

We will focus on the systematical development of new services and products along social megatrends

New services will complete our product offering along the social megatrends

Continuous success of our extended business proves DA's business model

IR Contact & Financial Calendar

Contact	Financial Calendar	2015
Investor Relations	Jan 12-13	Commerzbank German Investment Seminar, New York
Deutsche Annington Immobilien SE	Jan 14	JP Morgan European Real Estate Conference, London
Philippstraße 3	Jan 21	Kepler Cheuvreux German Corporate Conference, Frankfurt
44803 Bochum, Germany	Mar 5	Annual Report 2014
Tel.: +49 234 314 1609 investorrelations@deutsche-annington.com	Mar 9/10	Roadshow, London
	Mar 19	HSBC Real Estate Conference, Frankfurt
http://www.deutsche-annington.com	Mar 26	BoAML European Real Estate Conference, London
	Mar 27	Commerzbank German Residential Property Forum, London
	Apr 30	Annual General Meeting
	Jun 01	Intermin Report Q1 2015
	Aug 19	Interim Report H1 2015
	Nov 3	Interim Report Q3 2015

Disclaimer – Confidentiality Declaration

This presentation has been specifically prepared by Deutsche Annington Immobilien SE and/or its affiliates (together, "DA") for internal use. Consequently, it may not be sufficient or appropriate for the purpose for which a third party might use it.

This presentation has been provided for information purposes only and is being circulated on a confidential basis. This presentation shall be used only in accordance with applicable law, e.g. regarding national and international insider dealing rules, and must not be distributed, published or reproduced, in whole or in part, nor may its contents be disclosed by the recipient to any other person. Receipt of this presentation constitutes an express agreement to be bound by such confidentiality and the other terms set out herein.

This presentation includes statements, estimates, opinions and projections with respect to anticipated future performance of DA ("forward-looking statements") which reflect various assumptions concerning anticipated results taken from DA's current business plan or from public sources which have not been independently verified or assessed by DA and which may or may not prove to be correct. Any forward-looking statements reflect current expectations based on the current business plan and various other assumptions and involve significant risks and uncertainties and should not be read as guarantees of future performance or results and will not necessarily be accurate indications of whether or not such results will be achieved. Any forward-looking statements only speak as at the date the presentation is provided to the recipient. It is up to the recipient of this presentation to make its own assessment of the validity of any forward-looking statements and assumptions and no liability is accepted by DA in respect of the achievement of such forward-looking statements and assumptions.

DA accepts no liability whatsoever to the extent permitted by applicable law for any direct, indirect or consequential loss or penalty arising from any use of this presentation, its contents or preparation or otherwise in connection with it.

No representation or warranty (whether express or implied) is given in respect of any information in this presentation or that this presentation is suitable for the recipient's purposes. The delivery of this presentation does not imply that the information herein is correct as at any time subsequent to the date hereof.

DA has no obligation whatsoever to update or revise any of the information, forward-looking statements or the conclusions contained herein or to reflect new events or circumstances or to correct any inaccuracies which may become apparent subsequent to the date hereof.