AI Terminal

MODULE: AI_ANALYST
Interactive Q&A, Risk Assessment, Summarization
MODULE: DATA_EXTRACT
Excel Export, XBRL Parsing, Table Digitization
MODULE: PEER_COMP
Sector Benchmarking, Sentiment Analysis
SYSTEM ACCESS LOCKED
Authenticate / Register Log In

Vonovia SE

Regulatory Filings Sep 27, 2021

477_rns_2021-09-27_cd182579-eb04-449e-a39c-b48b135d7b71.pdf

Regulatory Filings

Open in Viewer

Opens in native device viewer

First Reaction Post Elections

  • Federal Elections
  • Berlin State Elections
  • Expropriation Referendum in Berlin

All data as of 6:30 CET on Sep. 27

  • Based on the official preliminary election results1 the outcome is tight with a small lead for the SPD over the CDU.
  • The election did not deliver an obvious winner, and SPD and CDU have both emphasized their intention to form a new government coalition led by them.
  • As the Greens and the FDP both had strong results, a three-way coalition with the two, led by the SPD ("Traffic Light") or CDU ("Jamaica"), look to be the two most likely outcomes.
  • Given the weak result of The Left, the combination of SPD, Greens and The Left has no majority. Based on the official preliminary results, it is not yet clear that The Left has even won enough votes to clear the 5% hurdle to get into the new parliament and may only get there on the basis of the three seats won via direct mandates.

  • The election result essentially makes one of two government coalitions highly likely:

  • SPD, Greens, and FDP ("Traffic Light") or
  • CDU, Greens, and FDP ("Jamaica")
  • A continuation of the grand coalition between CDU and SPD would also have a majority, but both parties have clearly signaled that they do not want to continue this combination.
  • A combination of SPD, Greens and The Left does not have a majority.
  • Because of the tight results, exploratory discussions between the different parties and subsequent coalition talks will most likely take time, and it may be several weeks or even months before a new government coalition is successfully formed.
  • Either coalition will require substantial consensus, and it is impossible to predict what concessions will be made by which party and on which issue.
  • The very strict hardline positions laid out in the various manifestos will most likely be diluted in coalition negotiations as parties are forced to find consensus and common ground to form a sufficiently stable government coalition.
  • In light of (i) the consensual view across party lines to combat climate change and reduce CO2 and (ii) the high ratio of retail landlords (65%) there is a factual need for housing policy to remain sufficiently balanced in order to increase much needed CO2 reduction efforts and also to leave enough "breathing room" for private owners.

  • The SPD won the Berlin State Election, followed by the Greens.

  • Franziska Giffey, head of the Berlin SPD, has declared expropriation a "red line" and said "We need an alliance for new construction of affordable housing with all stakeholders in the city and effective protection of tenants – not expropriations worth billions of euros" (cf. page 5).
  • Giffey has an alternative to the "R2G" coalition with a "Germany" combination of SPD, CDU and FDP (Liberals)
  • While a coalition between SPD, CDU, and Greens or between SPD, FDP, and Greens would have a majority, either combination seems unlikely.

Page 4

  • The New Berlin government will now be required to deliberate on whether or not to pass legislation with the target of expropriating large landlords in Berlin.
  • Similar to previous referendums (e.g. on keeping Tegel Airport open), the result is not binding and the government can decide not to pass an expropriation law.
  • There is no political support for expropriation among the CDU, FDP, and SPD.
  • The Left is in favor of expropriation and the Greens are divided, suggesting that only a smaller minority across the whole political spectrum in Berlin would be supportive.
  • Any legislation on the subject would be guaranteed to be challenged in court in what would likely be long judicial process during which the implementation would be suspended.

Franziska Giffey (Berlin SPD Leader and Candidate for Mayor of Berlin) on expropriation

"I don't think expropriation is the right way to solve the major social issue of affordable housing. On the contrary, not a single new apartment is created as a result. But we urgently need more housing. The 240,000 apartments that the initiative wants to transfer to state-owned companies are not vacant. The compensation costs would be over 30 billion euros, as much as an entire Berlin state budget. To expropriate across the board those who have more than 3,000 apartments would be neither targeted nor fair and would stand on legally very questionable ground, all the more so if compensation were paid below fair value. During the lawsuits that would be certain to ensue, there would be no investments and no new construction. We need an alliance for new construction of affordable housing with all stakeholders in the city and effective protection of tenants – not expropriations worth billions of euros." (n-tv; Sep 18, 2021)1

"For me, the topic of expropriation is a red line. I don't want to live in a city that sends the message: we do expropriation here. I grew up in the East Germany, and I experienced what it means - expropriation, really, even in people's lives. And what it means for the condition of a city […] We need more affordable housing, no question. We need investment in infrastructure. But we also need effective tenant protection. In my view, expropriation is not part of the toolbox." (rbb press portal; Aug 21, 2021)2

1https://www.n-tv.de/politik/Das-Signal-Hier-wird-enteignet-schadet-Berlin-article22811490.html. 2 https://www.presseportal.de/pm/51580/4999360.

Next Steps After Berlin Expropriation Referendum

  • Vonovia acknowledges the successful referendum as yet another sign that the situation on the Berlin housing market desperately needs to change.
  • However, expropriation would do nothing to improve the situation and would only make things worse. Not a single new apartment would be created and investments in modernization would come to a halt.
  • We need cooperation instead of confrontation. Time is of the essence and the housing market simply cannot afford the standstill and uncertainty that a long legal battle would bring.
  • The new Berlin Government should consider the referendum to be a wake-up call and seize the opportunity to bring all relevant stakeholders together to develop real solutions for the real problems that the people in Berlin, and those who want to move there, experience when it comes to housing.
  • Climate protection, demographic change, and a growing city we must act now to develop a targeted and coordinated housing policy that meets the needs of all parties involved.
  • Vonovia is prepared to make its contributions towards a new alliance for housing.

Manifestos: Investments, Modernization, and Climate Protection

Consensus on Need to Reduce CO2 but Different Ways to Get There

CDU/CSU SPD The Greens FDP (Liberals) The Left

Climate neutrality
until 2045
Tax incentives for

modernization
investments

Strengthen landlord
to-tenant electricity
models

Support innovative
research including
electrolyzers, fuel
cells, hydrogen
technology,
photovoltaics, and
innovation centers

Climate neutrality no
later than 2045
Subsidies
for

modernization
investments and
urban quarter
developments

Achieve CO
2
neutrality in the real
estate sector
Use CO
tax to

2
incentivize energy
efficient
modernizations
among home owners

Support
landlord-to
tenant electricity
models
Expand renewable

energy and increase
energy efficiency
Make Germany the

leader in hydrogen
technology

Support innovative
forms of renewable
energy generation

100% renewable
energy
by 2035
Increase

modernization rate

Reduce
modernization
allowance
(€1.50/sqm)

Refurbishments to be
neutral to warm
rents via "1/3 model"
with equal burden
sharing between
tenant, landlord and
tax payer

Subsidy programs
and tax incentives
for owners
Distribution along

energy efficiency
classes
Increase
CO
tax to

2
€60 by 2023 (instead
of 2025)

Simplify and support
landlord-to-tenant
electricity models
Include Paris Climate

Agreement Targets
in Germany's Basic
law

Deregulation to
accelerate energy
turnaround
Implement

environmental
policies free from
ideology

Support a lively and
innovative start-up
culture
Comprehensive

reform of energy
related taxes and
fees

Climate neutrality
until 2035
Introduce
climate

protection as a
government target in
Germany's Basic Law

Increase energy
efficient
modernization rate
by a factor of 3x
Refurbishments to be

neutral to warm
rents

Support
landlord-to
tenant electricity
models
Sources: Parties' manifestos and "First 100 Days Action Plans"

Page 8

CDU/CSU SPD The Greens FDP (Liberals) The Left

Measures to increase
supply instead of
additional regulation
(sufficient new
supply considered to
be the best form of
tenant protection)

Round table for
affordable housing
with all relevant
stakeholders
Rent increase
in line

with inflation

Temporary
moratorium on rent
increases in tight
housing markets

Continue 10% rent
cap on relettings
(Mietpreisbremse)
Increase look-back

period for Mietspiegel
to 8 yeas

Limit regular rent
increases to 2% p.a.

Ensure wide use of
qualified Mietspiegel
as firm legal basis for
rent increases

Continue and
enforce
10% rent
cap on relettings
(Mietpreisbremse)

Allow for federal
legislation to
implement rent
ceilings
Increase look-back

period for Mietspiegel
to 20 years

End "share deal
abuse"

Abolish the 10% rent
cap on relettings
(Mietpreisbremse)
Expropriation and

regulation lead to
less supply and are
not a solution

Increase
supply
through deregulation

Enable rent freeze
legislation anywhere
in Germany
Rent increase

moratorium in tight
housing markets

End "share deal
abuse"

This presentation has been specifically prepared by Vonovia SE and/or its affiliates (together, "Vonovia") for internal use. Consequently, it may not be sufficient or appropriate for the purpose for which a third party might use it.

This presentation has been provided for information purposes only and is being circulated on a confidential basis. This presentation shall be used only in accordance with applicable law, e.g. regarding national and international insider dealing rules, and must not be distributed, published or reproduced, in whole or in part, nor may its contents be disclosed by the recipient to any other person. Receipt of this presentation constitutes an express agreement to be bound by such confidentiality and the other terms set out herein.

This presentation includes statements, estimates, opinions and projections with respect to anticipated future performance of Vonovia ("forward-looking statements") which reflect various assumptions concerning anticipated results taken from Vonovia's current business plan or from public sources which have not been independently verified or assessed by Vonovia and which may or may not prove to be correct. Any forward-looking statements reflect current expectations based on the current business plan and various other assumptions and involve significant risks and uncertainties and should not be read as guarantees of future performance or results and will not necessarily be accurate indications of whether or not such results will be achieved. Any forward-looking statements only speak as at the date the presentation is provided to the recipient. It is up to the recipient of this presentation to make its own assessment of the validity of any forward-looking statements and assumptions and no liability is accepted by Vonovia in respect of the achievement of such forward-looking statements and assumptions.

Vonovia accepts no liability whatsoever to the extent permitted by applicable law for any direct, indirect or consequential loss or penalty arising from any use of this presentation, its contents or preparation or otherwise in connection with it.

No representation or warranty (whether express or implied) is given in respect of any information in this presentation or that this presentation is suitable for the recipient's purposes. The delivery of this presentation does not imply that the information herein is correct as at any time subsequent to the date hereof.

Vonovia has no obligation whatsoever to update or revise any of the information, forward-looking statements or the conclusions contained herein or to reflect new events or circumstances or to correct any inaccuracies which may become apparent subsequent to the date hereof.

This presentation does not, and is not intended to, constitute or form part of, and should not be construed as, an offer to sell, or a solicitation of an offer to purchase, subscribe for or otherwise acquire, any securities of the Company nor shall it or any part of it form the basis of or be relied upon in connection with or act as any inducement to enter into any contract or commitment or investment decision whatsoever.

This presentation is neither an advertisement nor a prospectus and is made available on the express understanding that it does not contain all information that may be required to evaluate, and will not be used by the attendees/recipients in connection with, the purchase of or investment in any securities of the Company. This presentation is selective in nature and does not purport to contain all information that may be required to evaluate the Company and/or its securities. No reliance may or should be placed for any purpose whatsoever on the information contained in this presentation, or on its completeness, accuracy or fairness.

This presentation is not directed to or intended for distribution to or use by, any person or entity that is a citizen or resident or located in any locality, state, country or other jurisdiction where such distribution, publication, availability or use would be contrary to law or regulation or which would require any registration or licensing within such jurisdiction.

Neither this presentation nor the information contained in it may be taken, transmitted or distributed directly or indirectly into or within the United States, its territories or possessions. This presentation is not an offer of securities for sale in the United States. The securities of the Company have not been and will not be registered under the US Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the "Securities Act") or with any securities regulatory authority of any state or other jurisdiction of the United States. Consequently, the securities of the Company may not be offered, sold, resold, transferred, delivered or distributed, directly or indirectly, into or within in the United States except pursuant to an exemption from, or in a transaction not subject to, the registration requirements of the Securities Act and in compliance with any applicable securities laws of any state or other jurisdiction of the United States unless registered under the Securities Act.

Tables and diagrams may include rounding effects.

Talk to a Data Expert

Have a question? We'll get back to you promptly.