AI assistant
SANDFIRE RESOURCES LIMITED — Capital/Financing Update 2019
Sep 17, 2019
65773_rns_2019-09-17_37cd0590-5dba-4090-ae2a-20ce7817f399.pdf
Capital/Financing Update
Open in viewerOpens in your device viewer
ASX and Media Release
Wednesday, 18 September 2019
==> picture [129 x 77] intentionally omitted <==
Red Mountain: EM Conductor discovered at Cir ue q
ASX Code: WRM
HIGHLIGHTS
Issued Securities Shares: 1,636 million Options: 565 million
Cash on hand (30 June 2019) $3.89M
Market Cap (17 Sept 2019) $11.4M at $0.007 per share
Directors & Management Peter Lester Non-Executive Chairman
Matthew Gill Managing Director & Chief Executive Officer
Jeremy Gray Non-Executive Director
Stephen Gorenstein Non-Executive Director
Shane Turner Company Secretary
Rohan Worland Exploration Manager
For further information, contact: Matthew Gill or Shane Turner Phone: 03 5331 4644
[email protected] www.whiterockminerals.com.au
-
Fixed loop EM at Cirque has identified a clear conductive horizon (Figure 1 & 2).
-
Conductance is low which may be consistent with a VMS horizon containing sphalerite (a zinc sulphide with poor conductivity).
-
There is also evidence of a second conductive horizon to the south.
White Rock Minerals Ltd ( “White Rock” or the “Company” ) is pleased to provide an update on the 2019 exploration program underway at the Company’s globally significant Red Mountain high-grade zinc and precious metals VMS project in central Alaska ( Red Mountain Project ).
There are already two high grade deposits at the Red Mountain Project – Dry Creek and WTF, with an Inferred Mineral Resource[1] of 9.1 million tonnes @ 12.9% ZnEq[2] for 1.1 million tonnes of contained zinc equivalent.
During the latter half of the 2019 field season reconnaissance of historic VMS prospects has been completed with the Cirque prospect (Figure 3) identified as the highest priority area for follow-up. The Cirque prospect was discovered in 1976 by RAA, Getty and Phelps Dodge. Massive sulphide float blocks, of up to 2 metres thick, occur within 300m of mineralised calcschist and carbonate outcrop. Assays from 18 samples averaged 5.6% Zn, 1.7% Pb, 49g/t Ag & 0.5% Cu[3] .
A surface geophysics crew has now just completed a single fixed loop electromagnetic (EM) survey across two horizons of massive sulphide that extend east under glacial till cover. Modelling of the results by Newexco – a specialist geological and geophysical consulting firm - shows a clear long wavelength anomalous response on all four lines, consistent with a single, strike and depth extensive, conductive horizon. The conductance is low which may be consistent with a VMS horizon containing weakly conductive lead-zinc sulphides. A second conductive horizon to the south is very weak with further surveying likely required to better define this feature.
White Rock’s Managing Director, Matt Gill said “The potential for multiple VMS deposits throughout the Company’s large strategic tenement package, expanded to 475km² last year, is only now beginning to be understood. “Our first ground geophysics survey on a historic prospect has identified the type of conductor that could reflect significant massive sulphide accumulations. We continue to be excited by the targets being generated and the opportunities that presents for follow-up drilling.”
==> picture [409 x 326] intentionally omitted <==
Figure 1: Conductor (purple plate) modelled at Cirque viewed to the west. Depth to top of conductor is approximately 150m. Satellite imagery draped on surface topography shows a colour anomaly above the conductor associated with massive sulphide horizons observed at surface trending east under glacial till cover above the centre of the conductor.
==> picture [460 x 269] intentionally omitted <==
Figure 2: Oblique aerial view to the southwest at Cirque. Blue lines show rough approximation of the fixed loop and the 4 grid lines. The Discovery and Dol massive sulphide horizons are on the western side of the glacial cirque. Sulphide boulders and quartz-sericite-pyrite altered schists are found in the glacial moraine.
==> picture [467 x 250] intentionally omitted <==
Figure 3: Red Mountain Project tenement outline on terrain map with locations for the Dry Creek and West Tundra Flats VMS deposit Mineral Resources[1 ] and regional VMS prospects.
1 Refer ASX Announcement 26th April 2017 “Maiden JORC Mineral Resource at White Rock’s Red Mountain zinc-silver Project, Alaska.”
2 ZnEq = Zinc equivalent grades are estimated using long-term broker consensus estimates compiled by RFC Ambrian as at 20 March 2017 adjusted for recoveries from historical metallurgical test work and calculated with the formula: ZnEq =100 x [(Zn% x 2,206.7 x 0.9) + (Pb% x 1,922 x 0.75) + (Cu% x 6,274 x 0.70) + (Ag g/t x (19.68/31.1035) x 0.70) + (Au g/t x (1,227/31.1035) x 0.80)] / (2,206.7 x 0.9). White Rock is of the opinion that all elements included in the metal equivalent calculation have reasonable potential to be recovered and sold.
3 Refer ASX Announcement 11th November 2018 “Expanded Land Holding with Additional High-Grade VMS Prospects, Red Mountain”.
Competent Persons Statement
The information in this report that relates to exploration results is based on information compiled by Mr Rohan Worland who is a Member of the Australian Institute of Geoscientists and is a consultant to White Rock Minerals Ltd. Mr Worland has sufficient experience which is relevant to the style of mineralisation and type of deposit under consideration and to the activity which he is undertaking to qualify as a Competent Person as defined in the 2012 Edition of the ‘Australasian Code for Reporting of Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves’. Mr Worland consents to the inclusion in the report of the matters based on this information in the form and context in which it appears.
No New Information or Data
This announcement contains references to exploration results and Mineral Resource estimates, all of which have been cross-referenced to previous market announcements by the Company. The Company confirms that it is not aware of any new information or data that materially affects the information included in the relevant market announcements and in the case of estimates of Mineral Resources, that all material assumptions and technical parameters underpinning the estimates in the relevant market announcement continue to apply and have not materially changed.
For more information about White Rock and its Projects, please visit www.whiterockminerals.com.au
For further information, contact: For Media and Broker queries Matthew Gill or Shane Turner Peta Baldwin 03 5331 4644 +61 455 081 008 [email protected] Cannings Purple www.whiterockminerals.com.au [email protected]
About White Rock Minerals
White Rock Minerals is a diversified explorer and near-stage producer, headquartered in Ballarat, Victoria. The company’s flagship exploration project is Red Mountain in central Alaska, where it has an earn-in joint venture arrangement with Sandfire Resources. At Red Mountain, there are already two high grade deposits, with an Inferred Mineral Resource[1] of 9.1 million tonnes @ 12.9% ZnEq[2 ] for 1.1 million tonnes of contained zinc equivalent.
The Mt Carrington project, located near Drake, in Northern NSW, is a near-production precious metals asset with a resource of 341,000 ounces of gold and 23.2 million ounces of silver.
White Rock Minerals is listed on the ASX:WRM .
APPENDIX 1: JORC CODE, 2012 EDITION – TABLE 1
Section 2 Reporting of Exploration Results
| Criteria | JORC Code explanation | JORC Code explanation | Commentary | Commentary |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mineral | • | Type, reference name/number, location | • | The Red Mountain Project comprises 760 mining claims in the |
| tenement and | and ownership including agreements or | State of Alaska (‘the Tenements’). | ||
| land tenure | material issues with third parties such as | • | The Tenements are owned by White Rock (RM) Inc., a 100% | |
| status | joint ventures, partnerships, overriding | owned subsidiary of Atlas Resources Pty Ltd, which in turn is a | ||
| royalties, native title interests, historical | 100% owned subsidiary of White Rock Minerals Ltd. | |||
| sites, wilderness or national park and | • | The Tenements are subject to an agreement with Metallogeny | ||
| environmental settings. | Inc, that requires further cash payments of US$850,000 over 3 | |||
| • | The security of the tenure held at the time | years. The agreement also includes a net smelter return | ||
| of reporting along with any known | royalty payment to Metallogeny Inc. of 2% NSR with the option | |||
| impediments to obtaining a licence to | to reduce this to 1% NSR for US$1,000,000. | |||
| operate in the area. | • | The Tenements are subject to an agreement with Sandfire | ||
| Resources NL (“Sandfire”) whereby Sandfire have an | ||||
| exclusive option to enter an earn-in joint venture agreement, | ||||
| which option may be exercised prior to 31 December 2018. If | ||||
| the option is exercised Sandfire can earn 51% by funding | ||||
| A$20 million over four years, with a minimum expenditure of | ||||
| A$6 million during the first year. Sandfire can then earn 70% | ||||
| by electing to fund a further $A10 million and delivering a pre- | ||||
| feasibility study over an additional two years, with an option to | ||||
| extend the time period a further year under certain | ||||
| circumstances. White Rock can elect to contribute at 30% or if | ||||
| not Sandfire can sole fund to earn 80% by completing a | ||||
| definitive feasibility study. White Rock can elect to contribute at | ||||
| 20% or if not Sandfire can earn 90% by sole funding to | ||||
| production with White Rock’s retained interest of 10% earnt | ||||
| from project cash flow. | ||||
| • | AlloftheTenements are current andingood standing. | |||
| Exploration | • | Acknowledgment and appraisal of | • | The Red Mountain project has seen significant exploration |
| done by other | exploration by other parties. | conducted by Resource Associates of Alaska Inc. (“RAA”), | ||
| parties | Getty Mining Company (“Getty”), Phelps Dodge Corporation | |||
| (“Phelps Dodge”), Houston Oil and Minerals Exploration | ||||
| Company (“HOMEX”), Grayd Resource Corporation (“Grayd”) | ||||
| and Atna Resources Ltd (“Atna”). | ||||
| • | All historical work has been reviewed, appraised and | |||
| integrated into a database. A selection of historic core has | ||||
| been resampled for QAQC purposes. Data is of sufficient | ||||
| quality,relevance and applicability. | ||||
| Geology | • | Deposit type, geological setting and style | • | Volcanogenic massive sulphide (“VMS”) mineralisation located |
| of mineralisation. | in the Bonnifield District, located in the western extension of the | |||
| Yukon Tanana terrane. | ||||
| • | The regional geology consists of an east-west trending schist | |||
| belt of Precambrian and Palaeozoic meta-sedimentary and | ||||
| volcanic rocks. The schist is intruded by Cretaceous granitic | ||||
| rocks along with Tertiary dikes and plugs of intermediate to | ||||
| mafic composition. Tertiary and Quaternary sedimentary rocks | ||||
| with coal bearing horizons cover portions of the older rocks. The | ||||
| VMS mineralisation is most commonly located in the upper | ||||
| portions of the Totatlanika Schist which is of Carboniferous to | ||||
| Devonianage. | ||||
| Drill hole | • | A summary of all information material to | • | No drilling results are being reported. |
| Information | the understanding of the exploration | |||
| results including a tabulation of the | ||||
| following information for all Material drill | ||||
| holes: | ||||
oeasting and northing of the drill hole |
||||
| collar | ||||
oelevation or RL (Reduced Level – |
||||
| elevation above sea level in metres) of | ||||
| the drill hole collar | ||||
odip and azimuth of the hole |
||||
odown hole length and interception |
||||
| depth | ||||
ohole length. |
||||
| • | If the exclusion of this information is | |||
| justified on the basis that the information is | ||||
| not Material and this exclusion does not | ||||
| detract from the understanding of the | ||||
| report, the Competent Person should | ||||
| clearly explain why this is the case. |
| Criteria | JORC Code explanation | JORC Code explanation | Commentary | Commentary |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Data | • | In reporting Exploration Results, weighting | • | No drilling results are being reported. |
| aggregation | averaging techniques, maximum and/or | |||
| methods | minimum grade truncations (eg cutting of | |||
| high grades) and cut-off grades are usually | ||||
| Material and should be stated. | ||||
| • | Where aggregate intercepts incorporate | |||
| short lengths of high grade results and | ||||
| longer lengths of low grade results, the | ||||
| procedure used for such aggregation | ||||
| should be stated and some typical | ||||
| examples of such aggregations should be | ||||
| shown in detail. | ||||
| • | The assumptions used for any reporting of | |||
| metal equivalent values should be clearly | ||||
| _stated. _ | ||||
| Relationship | • | These relationships are particularly | • | No relationship known about mineralisation and the conductor |
| between | important in the reporting of Exploration | at this stage. | ||
| mineralisation | Results. | |||
| widths and | • | If the geometry of the mineralisation with | ||
| intercept | respect to the drill hole angle is known, its | |||
| lengths | nature should be reported. | |||
| • | If it is not known and only the down hole | |||
| lengths are reported, there should be a | ||||
| clear statement to this effect (eg ‘down | ||||
| _hole length, true width not known’). _ | ||||
| Diagrams | • | Appropriate maps and sections (with | • | Refer to figures in body of report. |
| scales) and tabulations of intercepts | ||||
| should be included for any significant | ||||
| discovery being reported These should | ||||
| include, but not be limited to a plan view of | ||||
| drill hole collar locations and appropriate | ||||
| _sectional views. _ | ||||
| Balanced | • | Where comprehensive reporting of all | • | No drilling results are being reported. |
| reporting | Exploration Results is not practicable, | |||
| representative reporting of both low and | ||||
| high grades and/or widths should be | ||||
| practiced to avoid misleading reporting of | ||||
| _Exploration Results. _ | ||||
| Other | • | Other exploration data, if meaningful and | • | Geophysical contractor Zonge International completed a fixed |
| substantive | material, should be reported including (but | loop electromagnetics survey with readings completed on four | ||
| exploration | not limited to): geological observations; | 200m spaced lines and 25 to 50m spaced stations. | ||
| data | geophysical survey results; geochemical | • | Modelling of results by Geophysical consultants Newexco | |
| survey results; bulk samples – size and | show a clear long wavelength anomalous response on all four | |||
| method of treatment; metallurgical test | lines, consistent with a single, strike and depth extensive, | |||
| results; bulk density, groundwater, | conductive horizon. | |||
| geotechnical and rock characteristics; | • | The modelled conductor measures >1700m by >600m with a | ||
| potential deleterious or contaminating | 40° dip towards 190°. | |||
| substances. | ||||
| Further work | • | The nature and scale of planned further | • | The 2019 field program will finish by the end of September. |
| work (eg tests for lateral extensions or | Follow-up programs for the 2020 field program will be planned | |||
| depth extensions or large-scale step-out | in the coming months. | |||
| drilling). | ||||
| • | Diagrams clearly highlighting the areas of | |||
| possible extensions, including the main | ||||
| geological interpretations and future | ||||
| drilling areas, provided this information is | ||||
| not commercially sensitive. |