RESOURCE BASE LIMITED. — Capital/Financing Update 2023

Sep 19, 2023

ABUNDANT PEGMATITES AND TARGETS DISCOVERED AT JAMES BAY LITHIUM PROJECTS

ASX RELEASE: 20 SEPTEMBER 2023

• Abundant pegmatitic outcrops have been identified and mapped over both the Wali and Ernst Lake projects, with strike lengths of up to 1.6km long and widths up to 700m wide
• 84 prioritised rock-chip samples have been sent to ALS Laboratories in Val-d'Or, Quebec for analysis with more pending dispatch
• One key area of interest is a topographic high (see Photo 2) at the south-west contact point of the greenstone on the Wali Project, abutting the granite contact. Multiple samples with a total strike length of circa 1.6km on this mountain has indicated numerous potassium to rubidium ratios indicative of fractionated pegmatites via XRF, which is a leading preliminary indicator of a lithium bearing pegmatite
• Fieldwork remains ongoing with only 11 of the forecasted 25 day ground campaign days completed to date with the team back in the field this week
• Highly encouraging clustered outcrops with connected strike, have been mapped and analysed warranting further follow-up

Photo 1: Helicopter and Ground Survey Crew at Wali

Resource Base Ltd (ASX: RBX) (Resource Base or the Company) is pleased to provide shareholders with an exploration update on its Wali and Ernst Lake projects within the prolific James Bay region, Quebec.

The Company has identified an abundant number of outcropping pegmatites and boulders over both projects with currently a total of 11 days in the field. One of the significant finds within the first pass on-ground exploration is a topographic high along strike from the Corvette discovery (ASX:PMT) with encouraging potassium to rubidium ratios returned from a handheld XRF, indicating lithium bearing pegmatites may be present.

Our in-country team has discovered various cross-cutting structures over the glacial dispersion of the known North-East to South-West geological trend with numerous clusters of pegmatites. The two (2) projects combined represent over 100km2of lithium prospectivity and are within close proximity or along strike of globally significant discoveries.

Executive Director, Brent Palmer, commented: "It's a testament to the projects acquired, personnel both here in Australia and the exploration team abroad to have uncovered so many prospective targets, within such a short period of time. With additional areas of known pegmatite occurrences still not explored and assays pending, it's an exciting period for the Company."

Wali Project

The Wali project has uncovered various prospective zones of up to 1.6km strike length of pegmatitic outcrops, with 40 rock chips from pegmatites sent to the lab to be assayed from the first five (5) days on the project. The total strike length of the dykes paired with the magnetic data (See ASX announcement "High-Priority Targets Identified at Wali Lithium Project") suggests structural complexity over various strike directions, abutting the greenstone and granite contact (see Figure: 2).

Ernst Lake Project

The Ernst Lake project has exposed numerous pegmatites and outcrop-boulders in the first six (6) days on the project. A distinctive trend has been mapped hosting 44 pegmatitic outcrops within the metasediment and greenstone host of the Trieste Belt. The South-West to North-East system within the incumbent glacial trend has recorded fertile pegmatites of interest with the discoveries extending from the north to the southern strike of the Ernst Lake claim.

**+**Cautionary Statement: The Company notes that pegmatites contain varying abundances of typical LCT pegmatite non-Li-bearing minerals, predominantly feldspar, quartz, muscovite mica (as a group also referred to as Alpite) and accessory tourmaline. Investors should note that while LCT pegmatites are a known host for accessory lithium bearing minerals such as spodumene, it is also known that this is not a universal association. Visual observations of the presence of rock or mineral types and abundance should never be considered a proxy or substitute for petrography and laboratory analyses where mineral types, concentrations or grades are the factor of principal economic interest. Visual observations and estimates also potentially provide no information regarding impurities or deleterious physical properties relevant to valuations. At this stage it is too early for the Company to make a determinative view on the abundances of any of these minerals. These abundances will be determined more accurately through petrography, assay, and XRF analysis. The observed presence of pegmatite does not necessarily equate to lithium mineralisation. It is not possible to estimate the concentration of mineralisation by visual estimation and this will be determined by chemical analysis.

Photo 2: Topographic high with multiple outcropping pegmatites along the circa 1.6km strike (see Figure 2) +

Figure 1: Visible pegmatites recorded on the Wali Project with inset Topographic high**+**

Figure 2: Visible pegmatites and outcrops sampled on the Wali Project to date. Topographic high location within the greenstone contact (inset photo) shown via red dashed/broken trend line**+**

Figure 3: Visible pegmatites discovered and mapped along strike from the Loyal Lithium discovery

Photo 3: Ernst Lake Outcrop with the moss being removed and samples taken

Photo 4: Wali outcrop Photo 5: Ernst Lake outcrop

RESOURCE BASE LIMITED ACN 113 385 425 Level 8/99 St Georges Terrace, Perth WA 6000 T. +61 8 9486 4036 E. admin@resourcebase.com.au W. www.resourcebase.com.au ASX: RBX

Photo 6: Wali outcrop Photo 7: Wali outcrop

Figure 4: Wali Project location, James Bay region, Quebec

Figure 5: Ernst Lake Project location, James Bay region, Quebec

Pegmatites – Information relating to observed pegmatites:

1. The nature of the pegmatite minerals

The nature of the minerals are as coarse grained clusters with crystals from 1cm to 10cm.

The outcrops of the observed pegmatites were significantly weathered.

2. Minerals observed

The minerals visually observed in the outcrops of the observed pegmatites are as follows:

• Na/Ca Feldspar
• K-Feldspar
• Quartz
• Mica including muscovite, biotite and other mineral species
• Accessory minerals aggregated under "other minerals" in table 1 include Tourmaline, Beryl, Apatite and Garnets.

3. Estimates of abundance of minerals observed

The estimated abundance of minerals where observed as set out in the Annexure. Please note that the outcrops of the observed pegmatites were weathered and therefore estimations may be inaccurate.

Cautionary Statement: In relation to the disclosure of visual mineralisation, the Company cautions that visual estimates of mineral abundance should never be considered a proxy or substitute for laboratory analysis. At this stage it is too early for the Company to make a determinative view on the abundances of any of these minerals. These abundances will be determined more accurately through petrography, assay, and XRF analysis. The observed presence of pegmatite does not necessarily equate to lithium mineralisation. It is not possible to estimate the concentration of mineralisation by visual estimation and this will be determined by chemical analysis.

The Company notes that pegmatites contain varying abundances of typical LCT pegmatite non-Li-bearing minerals, predominantly feldspar, quartz, muscovite mica (as a group also referred to as Alpite) and accessory tourmaline. Investors should note that while LCT pegmatites are a known host for accessory lithium bearing minerals such as spodumene, it is also known that this is not a universal association.

ASX ANNOUNCEMENT

9

Resource Base Limited (ASX: RBX) has 100% ownership of two lithium exploration projects, Wali and Ernst Lake, both in the highly prospective James Bay lithium province, host to several major players and significant recent discoveries.

In addition, Resource Base owns Mitre Hill, a clay-hosted REE project in Victoria and South Australia, with a maiden JORC Inferred Mineral Resource estimate of 21 Mt @ 767 ppm TREO; as well as the Black Range Project, Victoria, targeting volcanic massive sulphide, epithermal and porphyry copper, gold & zinc mineralisation.

- ENDS –

This announcement has been authorised by the Board of Resource Base Limited.

For further information please visit our website – www.resourcesbase.com.au

Follow @ResourceBaseLtd

The Information in this report that relates to exploration results, mineral resources or ore reserves is based on information compiled by Mr Michael Beven, a consultant to the Company, who is a Member of the Australasian Institute of Geoscientists. Mr Beven has sufficient experience which is relevant to the style of mineralisation and type of deposits under consideration and to the activity that he is undertaking to qualify as a Competent Person as defined in the 2012 edition of the `Australian Code for Reporting Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves' (the JORC Code). Mr Beven consents to the inclusion of this information in the form and context in which it appears in this report. Mr Beven does not hold securities in the Company.

Annexure A: JORC Code, 2012 Edition – Table 1 report template

Section 1 Sampling Techniques and Data

(Criteria in this section apply to all succeeding sections.)

Criteria	JORC Code explanation	Commentary
Samplingtechniques	•Nature and quality of sampling (e.g. cut channels, random chips, orspecific specialised industry standard measurement tools appropriateto the minerals under investigation, such as down hole gammasondes, or handheld XRF instruments, etc). These examples should notbe taken as limiting the broad meaning of sampling.•Include reference to measures taken to ensure sample representivityand the appropriate calibration of any measurement tools or systemsused.•Aspects of the determination of mineralisation that are Material tothe Public Report.•In cases where 'industry standard' work has been done this would berelatively simple (e.g. 'reverse circulation drilling was used to obtain 1m samples from which 3 kg was pulverized to produce a 30 g chargefor fire assay'). In other cases more explanation may be required, suchas where there is coarse gold that has inherent sampling problems.Unusual commodities or mineralisation types (e.g. submarinenodules) may warrant disclosure of detailed information.	•This is an interim announcement of qualitative results. This program whichis currently in process consists of the discovery, field mapping and rockchip sampling of outcrops. No sample assays are provided in thisannouncement.•Field samples of outcrop were taken by field staff from outcrops utilising ageo-pick and hand tool. Samples are photographed and stored in labelledclear plastic bags for transport to the lab for analysis.
Drillingtechniques	•Drill type (e.g. core, reverse circulation, open-hole hammer, rotary airblast, auger, Bangka, sonic, etc) and details (e.g. core diameter, tripleor standard tube, depth of diamond tails, face-sampling bit or othertype, whether core is oriented and if so, by what method, etc).	•No drilling is utilisedon this program or reported in this announcement.
Drill samplerecovery	•Method of recording and assessing core and chip sample recoveriesand results assessed.•Measures taken to maximise sample recovery and ensurerepresentative nature of the samples.•Whether a relationship exists between sample recovery and gradeand whether sample bias may have occurred due to preferentialloss/gain of fine/coarse material.	•Not applicable
Logging	•Whether coreand chip samples have been geologically andgeotechnically logged to a level of detail to support appropriate	•Qualitative geological logging of rock chips and outcrops is completed inthe field.

Criteria	JORC Code explanation	Commentary
	Mineral Resource estimation, mining studies and metallurgicalstudies.•Whether logging is qualitative or quantitative in nature. Core (orcostean, channel, etc) photography.•The total length and percentage of the relevant intersections logged.
Sub-samplingtechniques andsamplepreparation	•If core, whether cut orsawn and whether quarter, half or all coretaken.•If non-core, whether riffled, tube sampled, rotary split, etc andwhether sampled wet or dry.•For all sample types, the nature, quality and appropriateness of thesample preparation technique.•Quality control procedures adopted for all sub-sampling stages tomaximise representivity of samples.•Measures taken to ensure that the sampling is representative of thein situ material collected, including for instance results for fieldduplicate/second-half sampling.•Whether sample sizes are appropriate to the grain size of the materialbeing sampled.	•The sampling technique used to obtain rock chip samples from outcropsmanually is in line with industry standards and standard explorationpractices.
Quality of assaydata andlaboratory tests	•The nature, quality and appropriateness of the assaying andlaboratory procedures used and whether the technique is consideredpartial or total.•For geophysical tools, spectrometers, handheld XRF instruments, etc,theparameters used in determining the analysis including instrumentmake and model, reading times, calibrations factors applied and theirderivation, etc.•Nature of quality control procedures adopted (eg standards, blanks,duplicates, external laboratory checks) and whether acceptable levelsof accuracy (i.e. lack of bias) and precision have been established.	•No assays are reported in this announcement, the announcement is anoperations update relating to the current mapping and rock chip samplingprogram that is still currently underway.
Verification ofsampling andassaying	•The verification of significant intersections by either independent oralternative company personnel.•The use of twinned holes.•Documentation of primary data, data entry procedures, dataverification, data storage (physical and electronic) protocols.•Discuss any adjustment to assay data.	•Field data is collated and sent back to RBX geological staff and/orcontractors where it is checked and verified.
Location of datapoints	•Accuracy and quality of surveys used to locate drill holes (collar anddown-hole surveys), trenches, mine workings and other locations usedin Mineral Resource estimation.	•No information pertaining to this release or program is or will be used inMineral Resource estimation.

Criteria	JORC Code explanation		Commentary
	Specification of the grid system used.Quality and adequacy of topographic control.
Data spacingand distribution	Data spacing for reporting of Exploration Results.classifications applied.	Whether the data spacing and distribution is sufficient to establishthe degree of geological and grade continuity appropriate for theMineral Resource and Ore Reserve estimation procedure(s) and	•Not applicable the announcement is an operations update relating to thecurrent mapping and rock chip sampling program that is still currentlyunderway
Orientation ofdata in relationto geologicalstructure	Whether sample compositing has been applied.possible structures and the extent to which this isthe deposit type.	Whether the orientation of sampling achieves unbiased sampling ofknown, consideringIf the relationship between the drilling orientation and the orientationof key mineralised structures is considered to have introduced asampling bias, this should be assessed and reported if material.	•Not applicable.
Sample security	The measures taken to ensure sample security.		•Company contractors collected all laboratory samples.•The sample contractors responsible for the collection of the samples arealso responsible for the transport of the samples to the lab.
Audits or reviews		The results of any audits or reviews of sampling techniques and data.	•No audit of data has been completed to date.

Section 2 Reporting of Exploration Results

(Criteria listed in the preceding section also apply to this section.)

Criteria	JORC Code explanation	Commentary
Mineral tenement and land tenure status	•Type, reference name/number, location andownership including agreements or material issueswith third parties such as joint ventures,partnerships, overriding royalties, native titleinterests, historical sites, wilderness or national parkand environmental settings.•The security of the tenure held at the time ofreporting along with any known impediments toobtaining a licence to operate in the area.	•All claims are believed to be in good standing withthe relevant government authorities and there areno known impediments to operation in the projectarea.
Exploration done by other parties	•Acknowledgment and appraisal of exploration byother parties.	•No exploration has been completed by other partiesto the company's knowledge.

Criteria	JORC Code explanation	Commentary
Geology	•Deposit type, geological setting and style ofmineralisation.	•Guyer and Trieste Volcanic formation and WachiskwIntrusion, with maps within the release based ongovernment mapping.
Drill hole Information	•A summary of all information material to theunderstanding of the exploration results including atabulation of the following information for allMaterial drill holes:oeasting and northing of the drill hole collaroelevation or RL (Reduced Level –elevation abovesea level in metres) of the drill hole collarodip and azimuth of the holeodown hole length and interception depthohole length.•If the exclusion of this information is justified on thebasis that the information is not Material and thisexclusion does not detract from the understandingof the report, the Competent Person should clearlyexplain why this is the case.	•No drilling has been undertaken on the project.
Data aggregation methods	•In reporting Exploration Results, weightingaveraging techniques, maximum and/or minimumgrade truncations (eg cutting of high grades) andcut-off grades are usually Material and should bestated.•Where aggregate intercepts incorporate shortlengths of high grade results and longer lengths oflow graderesults, the procedure used for suchaggregation should be stated and some typicalexamples of such aggregations should be shown indetail.•The assumptions used for any reporting of metalequivalent values should be clearly stated.	•No aggregation methods were used and no metalequivalents are reported.
Relationship between mineralisation widths andintercept lengths	•These relationships are particularly important in thereporting of Exploration Results.•If the geometry of the mineralisation with respect tothe drill hole angle is known, its nature should bereported.	•No mineralization widths are being reported.

Criteria	JORC Code explanation	Commentary
	•If it is not known and only the down hole lengths arereported, there should be a clear statement to thiseffect (eg 'down hole length, true width not known').
Diagrams	•Appropriate maps and sections (with scales) andtabulations of intercepts should be included for anysignificant discovery being reported These shouldinclude, but not be limited to a plan view of drill holecollar locations and appropriate sectional views.	•Please see maps and diagrams included in theannouncement text, that provide locations for theclaims and their location relative to other projects inthe area, with known geology from governmentmapping.
Balanced reporting	•Where comprehensive reporting of all ExplorationResults is not practicable, representative reporting ofboth low and high grades and/or widths should bepracticed to avoid misleading reporting ofExploration Results.	•The release is considered to be balanced and isbased on current available data for the project area
Other substantive exploration data	•Other exploration data, if meaningful and material,should be reported including (but not limited to):geological observations; geophysical survey results;geochemical survey results; bulk samples –size andmethod of treatment; metallurgical test results; bulkdensity, groundwater, geotechnical and rockcharacteristics; potential deleterious orcontaminating substances.	•To the best of the Company's knowledge, nomaterial exploration data or information has beenomitted from this release.
Further work	•The nature and scale of planned further work (e.g.tests for lateral extensions or depth extensions orlarge-scale step-out drilling).•Diagrams clearly highlighting the areas of possibleextensions, including the main geologicalinterpretations and future drilling areas, providedthis information is not commercially sensitive.	•The Company intends to continue explore thetenements taking priority samples with a view to dofollow-up soil sampling and/or drilling.

Annexure – Sample location and details

		Easting	Northing					Ca/Na	K		Other
Outcrop	Sample	(UTM	(UTM	Outcrop/	Rock Type	Grain size	Quartz	Feldspar	Feldspar	Mica (%)	minerals
Id	Id	Zone 18N)	Zone 18N)	Boulder		(cm)	(%)	(%)	(%)		(%)
23WO001	1000	618041	5941569	Outcrop	Pegmatite	5	25	20	55	0	0
23EO002	1008	670124	5894168	Outcrop	Pegmatite	1	25	5	65	0	5
23WO009	1021	621458	5943275	Outcrop	Pegmatite	5	8	5	85	2	0
23WO012	1024	620414	5942606	Outcrop	Pegmatitic granite	1-4	22	15	60	0	3
23WO013	1025	620231	5942755	Outcrop	Pegmatite	3	15	5	80	0	0
23WO017	1029	619822	5943220	Outcrop	Pegmatitic tonalite	1	30	55	5	0	0
23WO018	1030	616662	5940678	Outcrop	Pegmatitic tonalite	1	30	55	5	0	0
23EO013	1039	673915	5894488	Outcrop	Pegmatite	4	10	10	80	0	0
23EO014	1040	673839	5894513	Outcrop	Pegmatite	1	10	10	80	0	0
23EO015	1041	673616	5894397	Outcrop	Pegmatitic granite	<1-2	10	10	78	2	0
23EO016	1042	673721	5894572	Outcrop	Pegmatite	3	20	10	68	2	0
23EO017	1043	676069	5898291	Outcrop	Pegmatite	3	25	10	60	3	2
23EO018	1044	676166	5898337	Outcrop	Pegmatite	3	25	18	50	7	0
23EO019	1045	676232	5898360	Outcrop	Pegmatite	3	25	21	50	4	0
23EO020	1046	676648	5898722	Boulder	Pegmatite	2	20	20	55	4	1
23EO021	1047	676580	5897841	Boulder	Pegmatite	3	20	18	60	2	0
23EO022	1048	677832	5896891	Outcrop	Pegmatite	3	20	20	60	0	0
23EO023	1049	677951	5896840	Outcrop	Pegmatite	3	17	20	60	3	0
23EO024	1050	678029	5896792	Outcrop	Pegmatitic granite	1	15	25	60	0	0
23WO027	1051	614097	5941761	Outcrop	Pegmatitic granite	1	15	23	60	0	2
23WO028	1052	613992	5941805	Outcrop	Pegmatite	3	20	20	60	0	0
23WO029	1053	613994	5941693	Outcrop	Pegmatite	2	15	24	60	0	1
23WO030	1054	614360	5942719	Outcrop	Pegmatite	4	15	25	60	0	0
23WO031	1055	614341	5942950	Outcrop	Pegmatite	2-3	15	25	60	0	0
23WO032	1056	615214	5943064	Outcrop	Pegmatite	3	25	15	57	0	3
23WO033	1057	614857	5942997	Outcrop	Pegmatite	3	25	15	56	0	4
23WO034	1058	613865	5943115	Outcrop	Pegmatite	3	25	20	55	0	0
23WO035	1059	613725	5942922	Outcrop	Pegmatite	3	20	15	65	0	0
23WO036	1060	614354	5943391	Outcrop	Pegmatite	2-3	15	25	60	0	0
23WO037	1061	613333	5943717	Outcrop	Pegmatitic granite	1-3	15	25	60	0	0
23WO038	1062	613518	5943783	Boulder	Pegmatite	3	0	30	60	0	0
23WO039	2000	618028	5941560	Outcrop	Pegmatite	5	10	30	60	0	0
23WO040	2001	617295	5940586	Outcrop	Pegmatitic granite	1	20	7	70	0	3
23WO042	2003	618254	5939773	Outcrop	Pegmatitic granite	1	20	5	70	0	5
23WO043	2004	618646	5939573	Outcrop	Pegmatite	1-2	10	27	60	3	0
23EO026	2006	677328	5898672	Outcrop	Pegmatite	1-2	15	9	65	10	1
23EO027	2007	677909	5898747	Outcrop	Pegmatitic granite	1-2	15	7	70	7	1
23EO028	2008	677535	5898646	Outcrop	Pegmatitic granite	1	20	10	60	10	0
23EO029	2009	677504	5898555	Outcrop	Pegmatite	4	10	10	80	0	0
23EO030	2010	677335	5897748	Outcrop	Pegmatite	1-2	10	10	80	0	0
23WO044	3000	618305	5939980	Outcrop	Pegmatitic granite	3	10	8	80	2	0
23EO034	3004	670506	5894552	Outcrop	Pegmatite	1-2	30	5	63	2	0
23WO046	9001	617200	5940293	Outcrop	Pegmatite	3	7	8	85	0	0
23WO047	9002	618107	5939904	Outcrop	Pegmatite	3	15	10	75	0	0
23WO048	9003	618383	5939758	Outcrop	Pegmatite	3	20	10	70	0	0
23EO042	9011	672190	5893581	Boulder	Pegmatite	3	20	10	67	3	0
23EO045	9014	676625	5894706	Boulder	Pegmatite	7	15	20	60	5	0
23EO046	9015	676901	5894689	Boulder	Pegmatite	1-2	15	20	65	0	0
23EO048	9017	676747	5894858	Boulder	Pegmatitic granite	1	25	15	60	0	0
23EO049	9018	673089	5895156	Boulder	Pegmatite	4	17	18	60	4	1
23WO049	9019	623239	5944838	Outcrop	Pegmatitic granite	1	20	20	55	5	5
23WO050	9020	623214	5944814	Outcrop	Pegmatite	2	20	20	55	5	5
23WO051	9021	622917	5945248	Boulder	Pegmatite	4	21	25	50	4	0
23WO052	9022	622651	5944553	Boulder	Pegmatite	4	20	10	70	0	0
23WO053	9023	619372	5941563	Outcrop	Pegmatite	3	25	20	50	4	<1
23WO054	9024	619106	5941980	Outcrop	Pegmatite	4	12	13	75	0	0
23WO056	9026	618943	5941789	Outcrop	Pegmatite	4	20	5	72	3	0
23WO057	9027	618932	5941710	Outcrop	Pegmatite	4	20	10	67	3	0
23WO058	9028	618881	5941696	Outcrop	Pegmatitic granite	1	20	15	61	0	4
23EO050	9029	672684	5896741	Boulder	Pegmatitic granite	1-4	20	15	60	0	5

ASX ANNOUNCEMENT

OutcropId	SampleId	Easting(UTMZone 18N)	Northing(UTMZone 18N)	Outcrop/Boulder	Rock Type	Grain size(cm)	Quartz(%)	Ca/NaFeldspar(%)	KFeldspar(%)	Mica (%)	Otherminerals(%)
23EO051	9030	672819	5896696	Boulder	Pegmatite	4	23	15	60	0	2
23EO052	9031	672686	5896560	Boulder	Pegmatite	4	22	10	65	2	<1
23EO053	9032	672614	5896511	Outcrop	Pegmatitic granite	1	25	10	65	0	0
23EO054	9033	672604	5896554	Outcrop	Pegmatitic granite	1	21	10	65	4	0
23EO055	9034	672701	5896605	Outcrop	Pegmatite	3	15	15	70	0	0
23EO056	9035	672927	5896622	Outcrop	Pegmatite	4	14	10	70	4	2
23EO057	9036	673164	5896662	Outcrop	Pegmatite	1-3	20	9	70	0	<1
23EO058	9037	673950	5896002	Outcrop	Pegmatite	4	25	17	55	3	0
23EO060	9039	674606	5895653	Boulder	Pegmatite	3	30	10	57	3	0
23EO061	9040	675364	5895671	Outcrop	Pegmatite	2-3	15	22	60	3	0
23EO062	9041	676047	5895844	Outcrop	Pegmatite	3	30	10	60	0	0
23EO063	9042	676367	5896563	Outcrop	Pegmatitic granite	1	25	10	65	0	0
23EO064	9043	676466	5896755	Outcrop	Pegmatitic granite	1	20	10	65	5	0
23EO065	9044	676420	5896906	Outcrop	Pegmatitic granite	1	20	5	70	5	0
23EO066	9045	676223	5897035	Outcrop	Pegmatitic granite	1	25	5	70	0	0
23EO067	9046	676041	5897087	Outcrop	Pegmatitic granite	1	20	5	70	5	0
23WO065	9053	618487	5944100	Outcrop	Pegmatite	4	25	15	60	0	0
23WO067	9055	614563	5944226	Outcrop	Pegmatite	3	15	25	60	0	0
23WO068	9056	614356	5944374	Outcrop	Pegmatite	3	15	25	60	0	0
23WO069	9057	614532	5944428	Outcrop	Pegmatite	2	15	25	60	0	0
23WO070	9058	612978	5942844	Outcrop	Pegmatite	2	15	25	60	0	0
23EO069	XR001	668568	5893627	Boulder	Pegmatite	4	20	5	73	0	2
23EO070	XR002	673144	5895050	Boulder	Pegmatite	2	20	19	60	0	1
23EO071	XR003	673089	5895156	Outcrop	Pegmatite	4	17	18	60	4	1