AI assistant
REGIS RESOURCES LIMITED — Interim / Quarterly Report 2018
Jan 29, 2018
65733_rns_2018-01-29_b491f864-c60f-4600-b2d6-270dccb68734.pdf
Interim / Quarterly Report
Open in viewerOpens in your device viewer
Quarterly Report to 31 December 2017
==> picture [125 x 37] intentionally omitted <==
HIGHLIGHTS
DUKETON OPERATIONS
-
Record gold production (for the third consecutive quarter) of 92,113 ounces (Sep 17: 91,921 ounces) at Duketon.
-
Pre-royalty cash cost for the quarter of $689 per ounce and all in sustaining cost (AISC) of $855 per ounce (Sep 17: CC $684/oz & AISC $861/oz) are both well below the lower end of FY2018 annual cost guidance of $940-$1,010 per ounce.
-
First half gold production of 184,034 ounces at an AISC of $858 per ounce puts Regis on track to achieve the mid to upper end of the annual production guidance range of 335,000-365,000 ounces at the lower end of cost guidance.
-
Record quarterly cash flow generation from operations of $83.8 million for the December 2017 quarter (Sep 17: $62.9m).
CORPORATE
-
Record quarter end cash and bullion of $172.0 million at the end of the quarter (Sep 17: $131.3 million), an increase of $40.7 million.
-
Regis sold 104,408 ounces of gold at an average price of A$1,655 per ounce during the quarter (Sep 17: 79,437 ounces at $1,623/oz).
EXPLORATION
- Drilling (DD and RC) targeting underground resources at Rosemont South and Rosemont Main Pit have returned encouraging intercepts including:
2 metres @ 21.73 g/t gold from 168 to 170m 8 metres @ 7.30 g/t gold from 257 to 265m 3 metres @ 11.39 g/t gold from 140 to 143m 1 metre @ 80.80 g/t gold from 140 to 141m
Maiden underground resource estimate expected in the March 2018 quarter.
- Initial RC infill drilling at Discovery Ridge (NSW) returned numerous confirmatory intersections of >1g/t gold mineralisation. Significant results include:
66 metres @ 1.89 g/t gold from 74 to 140m 32 metres @ 1.96 g/t gold from 58 to 90m 34 metres @ 1.87 g/t gold from 36 to 70m 48 metres @ 1.25 g/t gold from 1 to 49m
Maiden reserve estimate expected in the March 2018 quarter.
- Infill and extensional diamond drilling at McPhillamys returned significant results including:
134 metres @ 1.24 g/t gold from 399 to 533m 143 metres @ 1.14 g/t gold from 490 to 633m 114 metres @ 1.08 g/t gold from 491 to 605m 57 metres @ 1.61 g/t gold from 109 to 166m
- Drilling (RC) targeting underground resources at southern end of Garden Well to commence in March 2018 quarter, following up earlier Regis drill results including:
19.6 metres @ 9.47g/t gold from 318 to 337.6m 19 metres @ 6.38 g/t gold from 131 to 150m 12 metres @ 9.52 g/t gold from 179 to 191m 5 metres @ 22.48 g/t gold from 192 to 197m
DEVELOPMENT – MCPHILLAMYS GOLD PROJECT
-
Work continued on the McPhillamys EIS and DFS with resolution of final site infrastructure layout the key focus.
-
Expected resolution of site layout in the March 2018 quarter should allow expedited completion of DFS thereafter.
Page 1
Quarterly Report to 31 December 2017
==> picture [124 x 37] intentionally omitted <==
DUKETON OPERATIONS
The Duketon Gold Project achieved record quarterly gold production of 92,113 ounces in the December 2017 quarter (Sep 17: 91,921 ounces). Production was higher than the previous quarter and at the upper end of the annual production guidance. The pre-royalty cash cost for the quarter of $689 per ounce and the all in sustaining cost (AISC) of $855 per ounce were both well below the lower end of annual cost guidance (Sep 17: CC $684/oz & AISC $861/oz).
Operations have achieved a record half year production of 184,034 ounces at an AISC of $858 per ounce, well below annual cost guidance. Production for FY2018 is expected to be at the midpoint to upper end of the annual production guidance of 335,000 – 365,000 ounces and at the lower end of annual AISC guidance of $940 – $1,010 per ounce.
Operating results for the Regis group for the December 2017 quarter were as follows:
| DNO | DSO | TOTAL | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ore mined (Mbcm ) | 0.6 | 0.7 | 1.3 |
| Waste mined(Mbcm) | 1.2 | 2.9 | 4.2 |
| Strippingratio(w:o) | 2.2 | 4.3 | 3.3 |
| Ore mined(Mtonnes) | 1.0 | 1.8 | 2.8 |
| Ore milled (Mtonnes) | 0.77 | 1.72 | 2.50 |
| Headgrade(g/t) | 1.21 | 1.23 | 1.22 |
| Recovery (%) | 95.2 | 93.3 | 93.9 |
| Goldproduction(ounces) | 28,596 | 63,517 | 92,113 |
| Cash cost (A$/oz) | 539 | 757 | 689 |
| Cash cost inc royalty (A$/oz) | 610 | 839 | 768 |
| All in SustainingCost(A$/oz)1 | 661 | 943 | 855 |
1 AISC calculated on a per ounce of production basis
Duketon Northern Operations (DNO)
DNO produced 28,596 ounces of gold at an AISC of $661 per ounce in the December 2017 quarter.
Production was 7% lower than the September 2017 quarter due to slightly lower throughput and grade from the Gloster deposit. The head grade of ore processed in the quarter was 5% lower than the previous quarter as the ore from the Gloster deposit trends towards the life of mine head grade as mining moves beyond the higher grade supergene zone in to the hypogene zone.
AISC of $661 per ounce was consistent with the previous quarter ($687 per ounce) with stripping ratios and mined volumes also consistent with the September 2017 quarter.
Duketon Southern Operations (DSO)
DSO produced 63,517 ounces of gold at an AISC of $943 per ounce in the December 2017 quarter.
DSO gold production was 4% higher than the previous quarter with slightly (2%) better throughput and incrementally better grade (1.23g/t compared to 1.21g/t) as a result of slightly higher grade mined at the Rosemont and Erlistoun pits.
Page 2
Quarterly Report to 31 December 2017
==> picture [124 x 37] intentionally omitted <==
AISC of $943 per ounce for the December 2017 quarter was consistent with the previous quarter, with stripping ratios across DSO remaining steady at 4.3 (Sep 17: 4.5).
Production Outlook
Gold production at Duketon in the second half of FY18 is expected to be slightly lower than the record first half production of 184,034 ounces as processed grades at DNO are expected to reduce to the life of mine average of 1g/t (H1: 1.24g/t) as the Gloster pit moves beyond the higher grade supergene zone. Production at DSO is expected to remain steady.
Full year production expectations for Duketon are between the middle to upper end of guidance.
CORPORATE
Cash Position
The Duketon project generated operating cash flow of $83.8 million in the December 2017 quarter, an increase of $20.9 million from the previous quarter due in part to the return to normal levels of gold in circuit at the end of the quarter and a 2% higher gold price achieved of $1655 per ounce (September 17 quarter: $1,623).
At the end of the quarter Regis had $172.0 million in cash and bullion, an increase of $40.7 million for the quarter. This increase is after the payment of $3.6 million for land acquisitions and water access licences at the McPhillamys Project and $9.2 million on exploration programmes at Duketon and McPhillamys. The following waterfall chart shows the movement in Regis’ cash reserves over the quarter.
==> picture [445 x 248] intentionally omitted <==
----- Start of picture text -----
Cash & Gold on Hand ‐ Q2 Movements
$230.0m
$83.8m
$210.0m
($11.2m)
$190.0m
($9.2m) $172.0
$170.0m ($8.4m)
($11.7m) ($2.7m)
$150.0m
$131.3m
$130.0m
$110.0m
$90.0m
$70.0m
$50.0m
----- End of picture text -----
Gold Sales & Hedging
During the December 2017 quarter, Regis sold 104,408 ounces of gold at an average price of A$1,655 per ounce (Sep 17: 79,437 ounces at A$1,623 per ounce). The Company delivered the gold produced during the quarter into the prevailing spot price. The total hedging position at the end of the quarter was 403,108 ounces of spot deferred contracts with a delivery price of A$1,557 per ounce.
Page 3
Quarterly Report to 31 December 2017
==> picture [124 x 37] intentionally omitted <==
EXPLORATION
Overview
Exploration at Duketon during the December 2017 quarter included the commencement of diamond drilling (DD) at the Rosemont underground project and infill RC drilling at Baneygo, Reichelts Find and King John projects. Regional exploration commenced with air core (AC) programmes conducted at Salt Soak, Steer Creek, Speights and Cuthbert’s Bore prospects.
In NSW, encouraging results were returned from the first RC drill programme at the Discovery Ridge satellite project and also from several DD holes drilled below the base of the planned McPhillamys open pit. RC sterilisation drilling at McPhillamys continued during the quarter for infrastructure purposes.
During the quarter Regis drilled a total of 70,058 metres across all projects as shown below:
| Prospect | AC | DD | RC | RC/DD | Metre Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Baneygo** | 6,444 | 6,444 | |||
| Beamish** | 11,770 | 11,770 | |||
| Butchers Well | 253 | 253 | |||
| Coopers** | 745 | 745 | |||
| Cuthbert Bore | 1,639 | 1,639 | |||
| Dogbolter** | 1,923 | 1,923 | |||
| Erlistoun | 612 | 612 | |||
| KingJohn** | 4,266 | 2,691 | 6,957 | ||
| Petra* | 1,718 | 1,718 | |||
| Ranch | 3,968 | 3,968 | |||
| Reichelts** | 2,582 | 2,582 | |||
| Rosemont** | 2,461 | 3,610 | 6,071 | ||
| Russell's Find** | 4,863 | 4,863 | |||
| Speights | 1,568 | 1,568 | |||
| Steer Creek | 5,406 | 5,406 | |||
| Tooheys Well* | 284 | 378 | 662 | ||
| Ventnor | 5,029 | 5,029 | |||
| McPhillamys(NSW)** | 3,953 | 1,965 | 5,918 | ||
| DiscoveryRidge(NSW)** | 379 | 1,256 | 295 | 1,930 | |
| Grand Total | 23,847 | 4,617 | 37,690 | 3,905 | 70,058 |
- Includes sterilisation drill metres
** Includes near mine resource development drill metres
Page 4
Quarterly Report to 31 December 2017
==> picture [124 x 37] intentionally omitted <==
Duketon Gold Project
During the December 2017 quarter, 62,210 metres of drilling was completed across the Duketon tenements. Drilling programmes during the quarter were conducted for mine resource development, regional exploration and sterilisation.
==> picture [327 x 435] intentionally omitted <==
Regis Duketon tenement package
Rosemont Underground Project
RC drilling to the south and below the final Rosemont open pit design during 2016 and 2017 has demonstrated the potential for the definition of underground resources at Rosemont. Phase 1 of an ongoing diamond drill (DD) programme commenced during the December 2017 quarter with assays received for 14 RC holes (2,461m) and 5 RC/DD holes (1,962m) at Rosemont Main Pit and 6 RC/DD holes drilled (1,648m) at Rosemont South.
Page 5
Quarterly Report to 31 December 2017
==> picture [124 x 37] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [486 x 62] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [486 x 62] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [486 x 63] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [486 x 62] intentionally omitted <==
3D long section from south east showing planned Rosemont project
The purpose of phase 1 of the DD drilling programme is to infill and confirm the mineralisation geometry determined from previous RC drilling programmes in preparation of reporting a maiden underground resource estimate in the March 2018 quarter. Future planned DD programmes include a round of deeper holes to test the quartz dolerite beyond the current extent of reasonable drill data density (approx. 300m vertical below surface).
Significant results received from the DD drill programme at Rosemont South during the quarter include:
-
5.7m @ 8.22g/t Au from 218m RRLRMRCD007
-
8.1m @ 7.30g/t Au from 257m RRLRMRCD009
-
0.96m @ 22.06g/t Au from 254m RRLRMRCD012
-
3.1m @ 20.36g/t Au from 259m RRLRMRCD012
In addition, RC drilling continued from the floor of the current open pit to infill gaps in prior drilling and continues when access is possible on the floor of the pit. Significant results below the final pit design received from the RC drill programme at Rosemont Main Pit during the quarter include:
-
2m @ 21.73g/t Au from 168m RRLRMRC694
-
3m @ 6.24g/t Au from 153m RRLRMRC702
-
2m @ 12.59g/t Au from 159m RRLRMRC702
-
1m @ 80.80g/t Au from 140m RRLRMRC703
-
3m @ 11.39g/t Au from 140m RRLRMRC704
Hole azimuths and dips for all holes are in Appendix 2 to this report. All intercepts calculated using a 2.5g/t lower cut, no upper cut, maximum 2m internal dilution. All assays determined on 1m split samples by fire assay.
Both drill programmes were successful in confirming current interpretations of high grade mineralisation geometry and will assist in the preparation of the maiden mineral resource estimate.
Page 6
Quarterly Report to 31 December 2017
==> picture [124 x 37] intentionally omitted <==
The geology at Rosemont has gold hosted in a steeply east dipping 345° trending quartz-dolerite unit intruding into an ultramafic sequence. Gold mineralisation is associated with quartz-albite-carbonatechlorite-sulphide alteration and is within the quartz-dolerite unit which varies from 5 metres to >100 metres wide.
A long section and cross section for the Main Pit area at Rosemont are shown below:
==> picture [485 x 122] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [485 x 121] intentionally omitted <==
Rosemont Main Pit Long Section with December 2017 quarter significant gold Intercepts
==> picture [488 x 222] intentionally omitted <==
Rosemont South Pit Long Section with December 2017 quarter significant gold Intercepts
Page 7
Quarterly Report to 31 December 2017
==> picture [124 x 37] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [254 x 162] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [254 x 162] intentionally omitted <==
Rosemont Main Pit Cross section 78940mN
==> picture [255 x 330] intentionally omitted <==
Rosemont South Cross section 77790mN
Page 8
Quarterly Report to 31 December 2017
==> picture [124 x 37] intentionally omitted <==
Garden Well Underground Project
A recent review of historic drilling below the final pit design at the Garden Well Gold Mine has indicated the potential for a very significant underground target below the southern end of the open pit project. Numerous thick, high grade intercepts (both RC and DD) sit below and to the south of the pit design in a zone of continuous mineralisation measuring 4-10m true widths across strike and 300m northsouth along strike. The zone of mineralisation sits between 100-300m below surface and appears to be dipping to the east and is open to the south.
Significant results from earlier drilling located at the southern end of the Garden Well open pit include:
-
19.6m @ 9.47g/t Au from 318m RRLGDDD109
-
19m @ 6.38g/t Au from 131m RRLGDRC407
-
12m @ 9.52g/t Au from 179m RRLGDRC317
-
5m @ 22.48g/t Au from 192m RRLGDRC244
-
20m @ 4.28g/t Au from 270m RRLGDRC319
The current drill spacing is approximately 40m x 40m which is too wide for underground resource estimation purposes. Drilling is planned to commence in the March 2018 quarter to both infill the known high grade zone to confirm continuity and to also test for extensions to the south.
The long section and cross sections below give the location of the intercepts above.
==> picture [506 x 133] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [506 x 133] intentionally omitted <==
Garden Well Long Section Southern End of Pit
Page 9
Quarterly Report to 31 December 2017
==> picture [124 x 37] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [263 x 168] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [263 x 167] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [263 x 167] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [263 x 168] intentionally omitted <==
Page 10
Quarterly Report to 31 December 2017
==> picture [124 x 37] intentionally omitted <==
Baneygo Project
An RC infill programme commenced at Baneygo during the December 2017 quarter. A total of 77 holes for 6,444m were completed and will continue in the current quarter. The purpose of the drilling programme is to:
-
Convert any inferred resources that may exist inside or below the current pit designs; and
-
Ensure drill coverage in gaps in the existing 2.5km strike with a view to adding further resources.
Encouraging results were received from several holes spread along the strike of the Baneygo project including one significant high grade interval located in the base of the oxide zone outside of the pit design to the south of the Baneygo North pit. Hole RRLBYRC417 returned 17m @ 16.3g/t. Au from 38m.
Significant results received include:
-
4m @ 5.75g/t Au from 29m RRLBYRC389
-
16m @ 2.00g/t Au from 57m RRLBYRC392*
-
7m @ 1.64g/t Au from 30m RRLBYRC394
-
12m @ 2.07g/t Au from 81m RRLBYRC413*
-
12m @ 1.66g/t Au from 88m RRLBYRC416*
-
17m @ 16.30g/t Au from 38m RRLBYRC417*
-
3m @ 18.54g/t Au from 96m RRLBYRC419*
-
10m @ 2.28g/t Au from 38m RRLBYRC435
-
4m @ 5.44g/t Au from 14m RRLBYRC441
-
16m @ 2.01g/t Au from 35m RRLBYRC442
-
2m @ 10.63g/t Au from 114m RRLBYRC443*
-
2m @ 6.77g/t Au from 72m RRLBYRC444*
-
Outside current reserve pit design
The remainder of the drilling programme will be completed over the next quarter and further drilling will be planned based on positive results such as those above.
King John Project
An RC infill programme was completed during the December 2017 quarter at the King John Project, 8km to the south west of the Rosemont mine. A total of 21 holes for 2,691m were completed with the aim of confirming historic drill intercepts in the inferred resource (0.8Mt @ 1.56g/t. Au for 42koz Au)
Encouraging results were received from several holes at King John including one significant high grade interval located in the transitional horizon at the south end of the main mineralised zone. Hole RRLKJRC026 returned 7m @ 15.05g/t. Au from 87m.
Significant results include:
- 7m @ 15.05g/t Au from 87m RRLKJRC026
Page 11
Quarterly Report to 31 December 2017
==> picture [124 x 37] intentionally omitted <==
-
7m @ 7.04g/t Au from 58m RRLKJRC031
-
23m @ 2.05g/t Au from 64m RRLKJRC032
-
14m @ 1.24g/t Au from 91m RRLKJRC033
-
3m @ 11.66g/t Au from 90m RRLKJRC034
-
7m @ 2.42g/t Au from 78m RRLKJRC035
-
7m @ 2.11g/t Au from 131m RRLKJRC035
The recent results will be used to update the resource and to plan further drilling with a view to moving the King John project towards development.
Reichelts Find
The Reichelts Find project is located 12km south of the Garden Well gold mine. Prior production is believed to include small scale underground mining between 1912 and 1939 and a small oxide open pit operated by Ashton Mining in the late 1980’s. Gold mineralisation at Reichelts Find is hosted by a strongly sheared ultramafic-mafic-sediment package. Locally, gold is hosted by quartz veins and surrounding localised shear zones. Gold mineralisation extends over a +550m strike. Current JORC 2012 resources, reported at a 0.4g/t Au cut-off grade are 0.8Mt @ 1.11g/t Au for 28koz.
A review of drill data for the Reichelts Find project has highlighted several historic high-grade intercepts located underneath the mined oxide pit. Only 12 RC holes have been drilled to deeper than 130m (down dip) along 1.4km of strike length.
Three of the 12 historic holes returned encouraging intercepts:
-
Section 6901770mN: 21m @ 8.1g/t from 147m,
-
Section 6901670mN: 17m @ 8.0g/t from 99m, and
-
Section 6901510mN: 12m @ 10.8g/t from 83m
During the December 2017 quarter an RC drill programme of 16 RC drill holes for 2,582m was completed to target mineralisation both below and along strike of the existing pit to test the potential for both open pit and deeper high-grade underground resources. Encouraging intercepts returned from the potential underground targets included:
-
8m @ 3.38g/t Au from 163m RRLREIRC107
-
3m @ 6.58g/t Au from 128m RRLREIRC110
-
7m @ 6.89g/t Au from 81m RRLREIRC112
-
2m @ 8.69g/t Au from 132m RRLREIRC113
-
2m @ 9.65g/t Au from 217m RRLREIRC116
-
8m @ 4.42g/t Au from 132m RRLREIRC121
Further drilling is planned at Reichelts to follow up on these encouraging results and update resources in due course.
New Prospects
Reconnaissance drilling at the Salt Soak, Cuthbert Bore, Steer Creek and Speights prospects was completed during the quarter. RC drilling at the Salt Soak prospect returned assays requiring follow
Page 12
Quarterly Report to 31 December 2017
==> picture [124 x 37] intentionally omitted <==
up. Results from first pass drilling at the remainder of the new prospects did not return significant results. Assays for this drilling is included in Appendix 2.
Salt Soak
The Salt Soak prospect is located on the Rosemont gold trend 18km to the north west of the Rosemont Gold Mine. The exploration target consists of a 4km strike length along a regional structural bend at an ultramafic-dolerite contact. Previous anomalous drilling results were investigated with a mix of RC (3 holes for 600m) and AC (43 holes for 3,203m) drill programmes during the quarter. The aim of the AC programme was to test the 4km ultramafic/dolerite contact on a regional bend in the stratigraphy and the RC programme aim was to test down dip of previous anomalous intercepts.
Previous results include:
-
3m @ 2.90g/t Au from 101m in RRLSSAC081
-
4m @ 2.5g/t Au from 86m in RRLSSAC253
-
3m @ 1.18g/t Au from 80m in RRLSSAC253
RC drilling during the quarter down dip of historic hole RRSSSAC081 (3m @ 8.71g/t. Au) returned 2m @ 28.6 g/t Au from 144m down hole in RRLSSRC002.
The intercept was logged as fresh strongly silicified/sheared mafic with minor quartz veining and significant sulphides (Pyrite/Arsenopyrite). The interval is considered potentially significant due to the high grade. There is little historic deep drilling targeting fresh gold mineralisation along this trend. See cross section below.
==> picture [344 x 211] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [147 x 8] intentionally omitted <==
----- Start of picture text -----
Salt Soak Cross Section 6936000N
----- End of picture text -----
A targeted RC programme is planned for the current quarter to test along strike of this significant intercept.
Page 13
Quarterly Report to 31 December 2017
==> picture [124 x 37] intentionally omitted <==
McPhillamys Gold Project NSW
The 100% Regis owned McPhillamys Gold Project is one of Australia’s larger undeveloped open pittable gold resources. The project is located approximately 250km west of Sydney, in Central West NSW, a well-established mining district. In September 2017, Regis reported a reserve of 60.1Mt @ 1.05g/t. Au for 2.03Moz.
Exploration work conducted during the quarter included the commencement of RC/DD drilling at the Discovery Ridge project and some deep drilling below the current pit design at McPhillamys.
==> picture [295 x 315] intentionally omitted <==
McPhillamys Gold Project and NSW Exploration leases location including the new Blayney tenement with the Discovery Ridge Project location.
A total of 8 diamond holes (3,953m) were drilled at McPhillamys to test for extensions to the gold mineralisation below the current pit design. Significant results returned included:
-
134m @ 1.24g/t Au from 399m RRLMPDD213
-
143m @ 1.14g/t Au from 490m RRLMPDD215
-
114m @ 1.08g/t Au from 491m RRLMPDD214
-
57m @ 1.61g/t Au from 109m RRLMPDD212
Several holes intercepted good lengths of +1g/t gold mineralisation below the current pit design. The following cross section 6292455N shows hole RRLMP DD214 returning 114m @ 1.08g/t gold immediately below the base of the reserve pit design.
Page 14
Quarterly Report to 31 December 2017
==> picture [124 x 37] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [370 x 156] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [370 x 155] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [370 x 156] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [159 x 9] intentionally omitted <==
----- Start of picture text -----
McPhillamys Cross Section 6292455N
----- End of picture text -----
Results to date are encouraging and suggest there is good potential to define further resources at the base of the current pit design. Once all assays from the deep DD drill programme have been received a review of results to date will be undertaken.
Sterilisation drill programmes at McPhillamys for infrastructure purposes are continuing.
Page 15
Quarterly Report to 31 December 2017
==> picture [124 x 37] intentionally omitted <==
Discovery Ridge Gold Deposit
Discovery Ridge is a shear hosted gold deposit located in strongly foliated, fine-grained metasediments of the Ordovician Coombing and Adaminaby Formations. The deposit is located within the hinge zone of a tight, steep north plunging D2 fold on the contact of the Adaminaby Group with the Coombing Formation. The deposit has a known strike length in the order of 200 metres and comprises a well-defined steeply north pitching East Lode with widths of around 50 metres and known depths of up to 500 metres and a parallel but more diffuse West Lode of similar orientation.
==> picture [238 x 100] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [238 x 101] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [238 x 100] intentionally omitted <==
Discovery Ridge cross section 22,360mN (local grid)
During the quarter 1,930m of a planned 6,000m infill drilling programme were completed. The ongoing drill programme is aimed at providing sufficient information to allow the estimation of an updated resource and maiden reserve at Discovery Ridge in the March 2018 quarter. Significant RC results received to date include:
-
66m @ 1.89g/t Au from 74m RRLDRRC017
-
34m @ 1.87g/t Au from 36m RRLDRRCD010
-
32m @ 1.96g/t Au from 58m RRLDRRCD015
-
48m @ 1.25g/t Au from 1m RRLDRRCD014
Results to date are in line (both location and grade) with historic drill results.
In addition to the work programmes at Discovery Ridge, a review of historic exploration data for projects other than Discovery Ridge located on the Blayney tenement is underway. The tenement has been subject to numerous exploration programmes by a number of companies looking for both McPhillamys/Discovery Ridge and Cadia deposit style mineralisation.
In addition to the target generation study on the Blayney tenement, the same process is being applied to all other Regis tenements in NSW with a view to commencing regional exploration in due course once all targets have been assessed and ranked.
Page 16
Quarterly Report to 31 December 2017
==> picture [124 x 37] intentionally omitted <==
DEVELOPMENT - MCPHILLAMYS GOLD PROJECT (MGP)
Resource and Reserve Growth
Regis continued to explore for extensions within the MGP (including Blayney Project) tenure during the December 2017 quarter.
Drilling commenced at the Discovery Ridge deposit located on Regis’ Blayney Project approximately 32 kilometres from McPhillamys. A Maiden Ore Reserve is expected in the March 2018 quarter with the view of developing a satellite operation to the MGP. Regis is targeting a minimal capex, higher grade and lower strip ratio type deposit that will augment the MGP in the early years of production.
As noted in the Exploration section of this report Regis drilled a total of 8 diamond holes at the McPhillamys deposit to test for extensions to the gold mineralisation below the current pit design. Significant results returned included:
-
134m @ 1.24g/t Au from 399m RRLMPDD213
-
143m @ 1.14g/t Au from 490m RRLMPDD215
-
114m @ 1.08g/t Au from 491m RRLMPDD214
-
57m @ 1.61g/t Au from 109m RRLMPDD212
The results from the portion of these holes that were within the reserve pit design will be used as infill drilling for the model and appear confirmatory of the surrounding intersections. These results will be incorporated in the next resource update.
Environmental Impact Statement (EIS)
A draft Preliminary Environmental Assessment (PEA) was submitted for review by the regulatory departments during the December 2017 quarter. This enabled meetings to be held with the various government departments to be involved in the regulatory assessment of the project and constructive preliminary feedback on the draft PEA was received.
Regis is targeting formal submission of the PEA by the end of the March 2018 quarter. This submission is the trigger for the key approval regulator, Department of Planning and Environment (DPE) to provide the Secretary’s Environmental Assessment Requirements (SEARs) for the project. The SEARs allow for the Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) to be appropriately focussed so as to enable regulatory assessment of the project.
The EIS is the body of work that is assessed by the regulators as part of the approval process. Areas that must be reviewed and reported on by specialist consultants and sub-consultants include:
-
Agriculture and soils
-
Surface and ground water
-
Ecology and biodiversity
-
Heritage
-
Air quality
-
Blasting, noise and vibration
-
Waste, chemicals, hazardous substances and dangerous goods
-
Economic assessment framework
-
Traffic and transport
-
Visual amenity
-
Social impact
-
Matters of national environmental significance
Most areas of the EIS are either complete or close to completion.
Page 17
Quarterly Report to 31 December 2017
==> picture [124 x 37] intentionally omitted <==
A key component of the MGP PEA relates to the infrastructure layout and its ability to minimise impacts on the environment and surrounding community, as well as to ensure compliance with the guidelines and regulations from those departments that ultimately assess the PEA. In relation to satisfying these requirements the only significant element of the infrastructure layout remaining to be settled is the tailings storage facility (TSF) location. In moving from PFS to DFS level studies on the location of the TSF it has become apparent that there are issues to be resolved associated with interaction of regulations involving surface water harvesting, water access licencing and dam classification. Regis is investigating these issues and liaising with regulators to determine a permitting pathway for the TSF.
Definitive Feasibility Study
The various elements of the Definitive Feasibility Study (DFS) into the development of the MGP continue to progress with activity in all the principal areas of the study.
The completion of the DFS has been delayed primarily due to ongoing analysis of the project infrastructure layout, in particular the TSF location as noted above. The finalisation of the site layout is required as a basis for final updates to detailed design and construction of the project for inclusion in the DFS. It is expected that a permitting position in relation to the TSF location will be resolved in the March 2018 quarter.
Much of the background work for the DFS is well advanced and finalisation of the DFS is expected to progress expeditiously once the site layout is resolved.
Process Water Supply
Regis is progressing pipeline route access to utilise water from the Mt Piper Power Station and Centennial Mine near Lithgow. This is one of the two long term water supply options for the project. Finalising of a binding agreement with Centennial Coal Company Limited (“Centennial”) and Energy Australia Pty Ltd (“EA”) for Regis to utilise the water is progressing.
Regis also continues to hold approximately 4.5GLpa of ground water access licences in a zone of the Lachlan catchment, approximately 80 kilometres from MGP as an alternative water supply.
Target Development Timetable
Regis had previously targeted completion of the MGP DFS in the December 2017 quarter. As noted above this has been delayed as a result of delays in finalising the site layout. The permitting position in relation to the TSF location is expected to be resolved in the March 2018 quarter and this will allow completion of the DFS and update of the development timetable at that time.
Page 18
Quarterly Report to 31 December 2017
==> picture [125 x 37] intentionally omitted <==
COMPETENT PERSON STATEMENT
The information in this report that relates to exploration results is based on and fairly represents information and supporting documentation that has been compiled by Mr Peter Woodman who is a member of the Australian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy. Mr Woodman has sufficient experience which is relevant to the style of mineralisation and type of deposit under consideration and to the activity which he is undertaking to qualify as a Competent Person as defined in the 2012 edition of the ‘Australasian Code for the Reporting of Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves’. Mr Woodman is a full time employee of Regis Resources Ltd and consents to the inclusion in the report of the matters based on his information in the form and context in which it appears.
The information in this report that relates to the Company’s Resources and Ore Reserves is extracted from the ASX announcement released on 14 July 2017 entitled “Mineral Resource and Ore Reserve Statement as at 31 March 2017” and the ASX announcement released on 8 September 2017 entitled “2.03 Million Ounce Maiden Gold Reserve at McPhillamys” and for which Competent Person’s consents were obtained.
The reports are available to view on the ASX website and on the Company’s website at www.regisresources.com.au. The Company confirms it is not aware of any new information or data that materially affects the information included in the original market announcement, and, in the case of estimates of Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves, that all market assumptions and technical assumptions underpinning the estimates in the relevant market announcement continue to apply and have not materially changed.
The Competent Person’s consents remain in place for subsequent releases by the Company of the same information in the same form and context, until the consent is withdrawn or replaced by a subsequent report and accompanying consent.
FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS
This ASX announcement may contain forward looking statements that are subject to risk factors associated with gold exploration, mining and production businesses. It is believed that the expectations reflected in these statements are reasonable but they may be affected by a variety of variables and changes in underlying assumptions which could cause actual results or trends to differ materially, including but not limited to price fluctuations, actual demand, currency fluctuations, drilling and production results, Reserve estimations, loss of market, industry competition, environmental risks, physical risks, legislative, fiscal and regulatory changes, economic and financial market conditions in various countries and regions, political risks, project delay or advancement, approvals and cost estimates.
Forward-looking statements, including projections, forecasts and estimates, are provided as a general guide only and should not be relied on as an indication or guarantee of future performance and involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors, many of which are outside the control of Regis Resources Ltd. Past performance is not necessarily a guide to future performance and no representation or warranty is made as to the likelihood of achievement or reasonableness of any forward looking statements or other forecast.
Page 19
Quarterly Report to 31 December 2017
==> picture [124 x 37] intentionally omitted <==
CORPORATE DIRECTORY
Regis Resources Ltd ( ACN 009 174 761)
Registered Office
First Floor, 1 Alvan Street Subiaco, WA Australia 6008 Tel +618 9442 2200 Fax +618 9442 2290
Website www.regisresources.com Email [email protected]
Directors
Mr Mark Clark (Executive Chairman) Mr Paul Thomas (Executive Director) Mr Mark Okeby (Non-Executive Deputy Chairman) Mr Ross Kestel (Non-Executive Director) Mr James Mactier (Non-Executive Director) Mrs Fiona Morgan (Non-Executive Director)
Company Secretary and CFO
Mr Kim Massey
Share Registry
Computershare Ltd GPO Box D182 Perth WA 6840
Shareholder Enquiries: 1300 557 010 (local) +613 9415 4000 (international)
ASX Listed Securities (as at 31 December 2017)
| Security | Code | No. Quoted | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ordinary Shares | RRL | 504,008,941 |
Page 20
Quarterly Report to 31 December 2017
==> picture [125 x 37] intentionally omitted <==
APPENDIX 1
JORC Code, 2012 Edition – Table 1 report template
Section 1 Sampling Techniques and Data
(Criteria in this section apply to all succeeding sections.)
| Criteria | JORC Code explanation | Commentary | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sampling techniques |
Nature and quality of sampling (e.g. cut channels, random chips, or specific specialised industry standard measurement tools appropriate to the minerals under investigation, such as down hole gamma sondes, or handheld XRF instruments, etc). These |
Rosemont: The projects above were sampled using Reverse Circulation (RC) and NQ Diamond (DD) drill holes on a nominal 20m east by 20m north initial grid spacing angled -60 degrees to 254 degrees or 074 degrees. |
|||
| examples should not be taken as limiting the broad meaning of | Baneygo, King John, Reichelts Find, Salt Soak & Discovery Ridge: | ||||
| sampling. | The projects above were sampled using Reverse Circulation (RC), drill holes on a various grid spacings angled -60 degrees to varying azimuths designed to drill |
||||
| perpendicular to the strike of mineralisation. | |||||
| McPhillamys: | |||||
| The McPhillamys gold deposit was sampled using NQ Diamond Drilling (DD) drill | |||||
| holes on a select pattern to infill larger data gaps, which were drilled angled -60 | |||||
| degrees to 270 degrees azimuth. | |||||
| Include reference to measures taken to ensure sample representivity and the appropriate calibration of any measurement tools or systems used. |
All Projects: Regis drill hole collar locations were picked up by site-based authorised surveyors using Trimble RTK GPS. Downhole surveying was measured by using either a Reflex EZ-Shot Downhole Survey Instrument or North Seeking Gyro based tool |
||||
| where magnetic host rock would affect azimuth readings. The surveys were | |||||
| completed every 30m down each drill hole. | |||||
| Core is aligned and measured by tape, comparing back to down hole core blocks | |||||
| consistent with industry practice. | |||||
| Regis drill hole sampling had certified standards and blanks inserted every 25th | |||||
| sample to assess the accuracy and methodology of the external laboratories, and | |||||
| field duplicates (RC only) were inserted every 20th sample to assess the | |||||
| repeatability and variability of the gold mineralisation. Laboratory duplicates were | |||||
| also completed approximately every 15th sample to assess the precision of the |
Page 21
Quarterly Report to 31 December 2017
==> picture [125 x 37] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [672 x 5] intentionally omitted <==
| laboratory as well as the repeatability and variability of the gold mineralisation. | ||
|---|---|---|
| Results of the QAQC sampling were considered acceptable. | ||
| Aspects of the determination of mineralisation that are Material to the Public Report. In cases where ‘industry standard’ work has been done this would be relatively simple (e.g. ‘reverse circulation drilling was used to obtain 1 m samples from which 3 kg was |
Rosemont, Baneygo, King John, Reichelts Find, Salt Soak & Discovery Ridge: For the Regis RC and AC drilling 1m samples were obtained by cone splitter (2.5kg – 3.0kg) and were utilised for lithology logging and assaying. The drilling samples were dried, crushed and pulverised to get 85% passing 75µm and were all Fire |
|
| pulverised to produce a 30 g charge for fire assay’). In other cases, | Assayed using a 50g charge (SGS, Bureau Veritas, Min Analytical and Aurum). | |
| more explanation may be required, such as where there is coarse gold that has inherent sampling problems. Unusual commodities or mineralisation types (e.g. submarine nodules) may warrant disclosure of detailed information. |
McPhillamys & Rosemont DD: Diamond drilling completed to industry standard using varying sample lengths (0.3 to 1.2m) based on geological intervals, which are then dried, crushed and pulverised to get 85% passing 75µm and were all Fire Assayed using a 50g charge |
|
| (ALS-Orange, SGS West Wyalong, Bureau Veritas). | ||
| Drilling techniques |
Drill type (e.g. core, reverse circulation, open-hole hammer, rotary air blast, auger, Bangka, sonic, etc) and details (e.g. core diameter, triple or standard tube, depth of diamond tails, face-sampling bit or other type, whether core is oriented and if so, by what method, etc). |
Rosemont, Baneygo, King John, Reichelts Find, Salt Soak & Discovery Ridge: RC drilling completed with a 139mm diameter face sampling hammer. AC drilling was completed with an 89mm diameter AC blade bit. |
| McPhillamys & Rosemont DD: | ||
| Surface diamond drilling carried out by using NQ3 or HQ32 (triple tube) and NQ2 | ||
| or HQ2 (standard tube) techniques. | ||
| Core is routinely orientated by REFLEX ACT III tool. | ||
| Drill sample recovery |
Method of recording and assessing core and chip sample recoveries and results assessed. |
Rosemont, Baneygo, King John, Reichelts Find, Salt Soak & Discovery Ridge: RC AC recovery was visually assessed, with recovery being excellent except in |
| some wet intervals which are recorded on logs. <1% of the overall mineralised | ||
| zones have been recorded as wet. | ||
| McPhillamys & Rosemont DD: | ||
| DD core was measured and compared to the drilled intervals, and recorded as a | ||
| percentage recovery |
Page 22
Quarterly Report to 31 December 2017
==> picture [125 x 37] intentionally omitted <==
| Measures taken to maximise sample recovery and ensure representative nature of the samples. |
Rosemont, Baneygo, King John, Reichelts Find, Salt Soak & Discovery Ridge: RC samples were visually checked for recovery, moisture and contamination. The |
|
| drilling contractor utilised a cyclone and splitter to provide uniform sample size, | ||
| and these were cleaned routinely (cleaned at the end of each rod and more | ||
| frequently in wet conditions). A booster was also used in conjunction with the RC | ||
| drill rig to ensure dry samples are achieved. | ||
| McPhillamys & Rosemont DD: | ||
| The target zones ranged from oxidised rock near surface where recoveries were | ||
| lower to highly competent fresh rock, where the DD method provided high | ||
| recovery. | ||
| Whether a relationship exists between sample recovery and grade and whether sample bias may have occurred due to preferential loss/gain of fine/coarse material. |
Rosemont, Baneygo, King John, Reichelts Find, Salt Soak & Discovery Ridge: Sample recoveries for RC and AC drilling are visually estimated to be medium to high. No significant bias is expected although no recovery and grade correlation |
|
| study was completed. | ||
| McPhillamys & Rosemont DD: | ||
| The DD drill sample recovery in the transitional and fresh rock zones is very high, | ||
| and no significant bias is expected. Recoveries in the oxidised rock were lower. | ||
| Logging | Whether core and chip samples have been geologically and geotechnically logged to a level of detail to support appropriate Mineral Resource estimation, mining studies and metallurgical studies. |
Rosemont, Baneygo, King John, Reichelts Find, Salt Soak & Discovery Ridge: Lithology, alteration, veining, mineralisation and, on some holes, magnetic susceptibility were logged from the RC chips and saved in the database. Chips from every interval are also placed in chip trays and stored in a designated building |
| at site for future reference. | ||
| McPhillamys & Rosemont DD: | ||
| Lithology, alteration, veining, mineralisation and geotechnical information were | ||
| logged from the DD core and saved in the database. Half core from every interval | ||
| are also retained in the core trays and stored in a designated building at site for | ||
| future reference. | ||
| Whether logging is qualitative or quantitative in nature. Core (or costean, channel, etc) photography. |
All logging is qualitative except for magnetic susceptibility and geotechnical measurements. Wet and dry photographs were completed on the core. |
Page 23
Quarterly Report to 31 December 2017
==> picture [125 x 37] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [672 x 5] intentionally omitted <==
The total length and percentage of the relevant intersections All drill holes are logged in full. logged.
| The total length and percentage of the relevant intersections logged. |
All drill holes are logged in full. | |
|---|---|---|
| Sub- sampling techniques and sample |
If core, whether cut or sawn and whether quarter, half or all core taken. |
McPhillamys & Rosemont diamond: Core was half cut with a diamond core saw with the same half always sampled and the surplus retained in the core trays. Non-competent clay zones are sampled as whole core where necessary due to difficulty in cutting. |
| preparation | ||
| If non-core, whether riffled, tube sampled, rotary split, etc and whether sampled wet or dry. |
RC and AC drilling utilised a cyclone and cone splitter to consistently produce 0.5kg to 3.0kg dry samples. |
|
| For all sample types, the nature, quality and appropriateness of the sample preparation technique. |
Samples are dried, crushed to 10mm, and then pulverised to 85% passing 75µm (industry standard practice is assumed for the historical drilling). This is considered acceptable. |
|
| Quality control procedures adopted for all sub-sampling stages to maximise representivity of samples. |
Field duplicates (RC, AC) were inserted every 20th sample to assess the repeatability and variability of the gold mineralisation. Laboratory duplicates were also completed roughly every 15th sample to assess the repeatability and |
|
| variability of the gold mineralisation. | ||
| Measures taken to ensure that the sampling is representative of the in situ material collected, including for instance results for field duplicate/second-half sampling. |
Field RC duplicates (RC, AC) were taken at the rig from a second chute on the cone splitter allowing for the duplicate and main sample to be the same size and sampling technique. Field duplicates are taken every 20th sample. Laboratory duplicates (sample preparation split) were also completed roughly every 15th |
|
| sample. | ||
| Field duplicates on core, i.e. other half of cut core, have not been routinely | ||
| assayed. | ||
| Whether sample sizes are appropriate to the grain size of the material being sampled. |
Sample sizes (1.0kg to 3kg) are considered to be a sufficient size to accurately represent the gold mineralisation based on the mineralisation style (hypogene associated with shearing and supergene enrichment), the width and continuity of |
|
| the intersections, the sampling methodology, the coarse gold variability and the | ||
| assay ranges for the gold. |
Page 24
Quarterly Report to 31 December 2017
==> picture [125 x 37] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [672 x 5] intentionally omitted <==
Field duplicates have routinely been collected to ensure monitoring of the subsampling quality. Acceptable precision and accuracy is noted in the field duplicates albeit the precision is marginally acceptable and consistent with coarse gold deposits. Quality of The nature, quality and appropriateness of the assaying and Rosemont, Baneygo, King John, Reichelts Find, Salt Soak & Discovery assay data laboratory procedures used and whether the technique is Ridge: and considered partial or total. All gold assaying was completed by external commercial laboratories (SGS, laboratory Bureau Veritas, Min Analytical and Aurum) using either a 40g or 50g charge for tests fire assay analysis with AAS finish. This technique is industry standard for gold and considered appropriate. McPhillamys DD: All gold assaying was completed by commercial laboratories (ALS-Orange, NSW, SGS West Wyalong) using either a 40g or 50g charge for fire assay analysis with AAS finish. This technique is industry standard for gold and considered appropriate. For geophysical tools, spectrometers, handheld XRF instruments, Apart from magnetic susceptibility in targeted zones, no other geophysical etc, the parameters used in determining the analysis including measurements were routinely made. instrument make and model, reading times, calibrations factors applied and their derivation, etc. Nature of quality control procedures adopted (e.g. standards, Certified Reference Material (CRM or standards) and blanks were inserted every blanks, duplicates, external laboratory checks) and whether 25th sample to assess the assaying accuracy of the external laboratories. Field duplicates (RC, AC) were inserted every 20th sample to assess the repeatability acceptable levels of accuracy (ie lack of bias) and precision have from the field and variability of the gold mineralisation. Laboratory duplicates were been established. also completed approximately every 15th sample to assess the precision of assaying.
Evaluation of both the Regis submitted standards, and the internal laboratory quality control data, indicates assaying to be accurate and without significant drift for significant time periods. Excluding obvious errors, the vast majority of the CRM assaying report shows an overall mean bias of less than 5% with no consistent positive or negative bias noted. Duplicate assaying show high levels of correlation and no apparent bias between the duplicate pairs. Field duplicate samples show marginally acceptable levels of correlation and no relative bias.
Page 25
Quarterly Report to 31 December 2017
==> picture [125 x 37] intentionally omitted <==
| Results of the QAQC sampling were considered acceptable for the deposits. | ||
|---|---|---|
| Substantial focus has been given to ensuring sampling procedures met industry | ||
| best practise to ensure acceptable levels of accuracy and precision were achieved | ||
| in a coarse gold environment. | ||
| Verification of sampling and assaying |
The verification of significant intersections by either independent or alternative company personnel. |
No independent personnel have visually inspected the significant intersections in RC chips. Numerous highly qualified and experienced company personnel from exploration and production positions have visually inspected the significant intersections in RC chips. |
| The use of twinned holes. | No twinning of holes was completed in the current quarter. Several RC holes were | |
| drilled at Discovery Ridge in proximity to historic holes but would not be classed at | ||
| twin holes | ||
| Documentation of primary data, data entry procedures, data verification, data storage (physical and electronic) protocols. |
All geological and field data is entered into excel spreadsheets with lookup tables and fixed formatting (and protected from modification) thus only allowing data to be entered using the Regis geological code system and sample protocol. Data is |
|
| then emailed to the Regis database administrator for validation and importation | ||
| into a SQL database using Datashed. | ||
| Discuss any adjustment to assay data. | Any samples not assayed (i.e. destroyed in processing, listed not received) have had the assay value converted to a -9 in the database. Any samples assayed |
|
| below detection limit (0.01 ppm Au) have been converted to 0.005 ppm (half | ||
| detection limit) in the database. | ||
| Location of data points |
Accuracy and quality of surveys used to locate drill holes (collar and down-hole surveys), trenches, mine workings and other locations used in Mineral Resource estimation. |
Regis drill hole collar locations were picked up by site-based authorized surveyors using Trimble RTK GPS, calibrated to a base station (expected accuracy of 20mm). |
| Downhole surveying was measured by using either a Reflex EZ-Shot Downhole | ||
| Survey Instrument or North Seeking Gyro based tool where magnetic host rock | ||
| would affect azimuth readings | ||
| The surveys were completed every 30m down each drill hole. | ||
| Specification of the grid system used. | The grid system is and AMG Zone 51 (AGD 84) for surveying pickups. Modelling at Rosemont and Baneygo is completed using a local grid, with conversion of |
|
| digital data from AMG to local completed using macros. |
Page 26
Quarterly Report to 31 December 2017
==> picture [125 x 37] intentionally omitted <==
| McPhillamys | ||
|---|---|---|
| The grid system is and GDA94 Zone 55 for surveying pickups, as well as any | ||
| modelling. | ||
| Quality and adequacy of topographic control. | The topographic surface for all projects were derived from a combination of the primary drill hole pickups and the pre-existing photogrammetric contouring. |
|
| Data spacing and distribution |
Data spacing for reporting of Exploration Results. | Rosemont, Baneygo, Reichelts Find, King John Discovery Ridge: The drilling completed this period is planned reducing the effective spacing to 20 metres (east) by 20 metres (north). |
| McPhillamys: | ||
| Current plan has reduced sample spacing to 25mx25m in selected parts of the | ||
| deposit | ||
| Whether the data spacing and distribution is sufficient to establish the degree of geological and grade continuity appropriate for the Mineral Resource and Ore Reserve estimation procedure(s) and classifications applied. |
Rosemont, Baneygo, King John, Reichelts Find, Discovery Ridge & McPhillamys: The planned data spacing and distribution is sufficient to demonstrate spatial and grade continuity of the mineralised domains to support the definition of Inferred and Indicated Mineral Resources under the 2012 JORC code once all other |
|
| modifying factors have been addressed. | ||
| Whether sample compositing has been applied. | Rosemont, Reichelts Find & McPhillamys: No sample compositing has been applied in the field within the mineralised zones. |
|
| Orientation of data in relation to geological |
Whether the orientation of sampling achieves unbiased sampling of possible structures and the extent to which this is known, considering the deposit type. |
Drilling on all projects is orientated to best suit the mineralisation to be closely perpendicular to both the strike and dip of the mineralisation. Intercepts are close to true-width in most cases. See cross section diagrams. In the case of Rosemont underground drill programmes, the current drilling is designed to assist in determining ore geometry and therefore a more accurate estimate of true |
| structure | thickness | |
| If the relationship between the drilling orientation and the orientation | It is not believed that drilling orientation has introduced a sampling bias. | |
| of key mineralised structures is considered to have introduced a | ||
| sampling bias, this should be assessed and reported if material. |
Page 27
Quarterly Report to 31 December 2017
==> picture [125 x 37] intentionally omitted <==
| Sample security |
The measures taken to ensure sample security. | Samples are securely sealed and stored onsite, until delivery to Perth via contract freight Transport, who then deliver the samples directly to the laboratory. Sample submission forms are sent with the samples as well as emailed to the laboratory, |
|---|---|---|
| and are used to keep track of the sample batches. | ||
| McPhillamys | ||
| Samples are securely sealed and stored onsite, until pickup by ALS or SGS truck | ||
| and delivery to Orange or West Wyalong laboratory. Sample submission forms | ||
| are sent with the samples as well as emailed to the laboratory, and are used to | ||
| keep track of the sample batches. | ||
| Audits or | The results of any audits or reviews of sampling techniques and | No external audits on sampling techniques and data have been completed. |
| reviews | data. |
Page 28
Quarterly Report to 31 December 2017
==> picture [125 x 37] intentionally omitted <==
Section 2 Reporting of Exploration Results
(Criteria listed in the preceding section also apply to this section.)
| Criteria | JORC Code explanation | Commentary | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mineral tenement and land tenure status |
Type, reference name/number, location and ownership including agreements or material issues with third parties such as joint ventures, partnerships, overriding royalties, native title interests, historical sites, wilderness or national park and environmental |
Rosemont: The Rosemont project is located on M38/237, 250 & 343). Current registered holders of the tenements are Regis Resources Ltd & Duketon Resources Pty Ltd (100% subsidiary of Regis Resources). Area = 1683.2ha. Normal Western Australian state royalties apply plus there is a 2% Royalty to |
|
| settings. | Franco Nevada. There are no registered Native Title Claims. | ||
| The security of the tenure held at the time of reporting along with | Reichelts Find: | ||
| any known impediments to obtaining a licence to operate in the | The project is located on M38/341. Current registered holders of the tenement is | ||
| area. | Regis Resources Ltd and Duketon Resources Pty Ltd (100% subsidiary of Regis | ||
| Resources). Area = 241.65ha. Normal Western Australian state royalties apply | |||
| plus there is a 2% Royalty to Franco Nevada. There are no registered Native Title | |||
| Claims. | |||
| McPhillamys | |||
| The McPhillamys deposit is located on the granted tenement EL5760 granted in | |||
| 2000., Lease area = 11,760Ha. Current registered holder of the tenement is LFB | |||
| Resources NL (100% subsidiary of Regis Resources). Normal NSW state royalties | |||
| apply. There are no registered Native Title Claims. | |||
| Baneygo: | |||
| M38/344 – Reg Holders, Regis Resources Ltd & Duketon Resources Pty Ltd; Area | |||
| 980.45ha; granted 23 April 1993; 2% Franco Nevada Royalty; no Native Title | |||
| claims | |||
| King John: | |||
| M38/600 – Reg Holders, Duketon Resources Pty Ltd & Mark Creasy; Area | |||
| 917.30ha, granted 18 April 2007; 2% Franco Nevada Royalty; no Native Title | |||
| claims | |||
| Discovery Ridge: | |||
| NSW – EL5922 – Reg Holder, LFB Resources NL; granted 15 Feb 2002; | |||
| transferred from Templar Resources PtyLtd,26 May2017;no Native Title claims |
Page 29
Quarterly Report to 31 December 2017
==> picture [125 x 37] intentionally omitted <==
| Salt Soak: | ||
|---|---|---|
| P38/4271– Reg Holder, Regis; Area 199.97HA; Granted 5 May 2017; No | ||
| additional royalty; no Native Title claims | ||
| P38/4273– Reg Holder, Regis; Area 199.96HA; Granted 5 May 2017; No | ||
| additional royalty; no Native Title claims | ||
| Exploration done by other parties |
Acknowledgment and appraisal of exploration by other parties. | Rosemont, Baneygo, King John, Reichelts Find: Shallow drilling (less than 100m vertical depth) completed by Aurora, Ashton and Johnsons Well Mining in the 1990’s. |
| McPhillamys & Discovery Ridge: | ||
| Resource development drilling conducted by Newmont and then Alkane | ||
| Resources in the 1990’s. Discovery Ridge previously drilled by Straits Resources | ||
| and Goldminco | ||
| Geology | Deposit type, geological setting and style of mineralisation. | Rosemont: Gold is hosted in a steeply east dipping 345° trending quartz-dolerite unit intruding |
| an ultramafic sequence. Gold mineralisation is associated with quartz-carbonate- | ||
| chlorite-sulphide alteration and is restricted to the quartz dolerite unit which is | ||
| generally approximately 80m wide. Weathering depths vary from 20m to 50m | ||
| vertical depth. | ||
| Reichelts Find: | ||
| Gold mineralisation at Reichelts Find is hosted by a strongly sheared ultramafic- | ||
| mafic unit. Historical reports mentioned that gold is hosted by quartz veins and | ||
| surrounding localised shear zones. | ||
| King John: | ||
| The project is located on the lithological contact of a NE gently dipping granodiorite | ||
| hanging wall and andesite footwall. Quartz veining is common within the | ||
| granodiorite in the ore zones. | ||
| McPhillamys: | ||
| The McPhillamys gold deposit is hosted in Silurian aged sheared intermediate | ||
| volcaniclastic rocks in the Lachlan Fold Belt. Gold mineralisation is associated with | ||
| strongly sheared volcaniclastics with strong quartz-carbonate-sericite-pyrite- | ||
| pyrrhotite alteration. The gold mineralisation trends roughly north-south over a | ||
| strike distance of 900m and dips steeplyeast at 70º to 80º. |
Page 30
Quarterly Report to 31 December 2017
==> picture [125 x 37] intentionally omitted <==
| Discovery Ridge: | ||
|---|---|---|
| Discovery Ridge is a shear hosted gold deposit located in strongly foliated, fine- | ||
| grained metasediments of the Ordovician Coombingand AdaminabyFormations | ||
| Drill hole | A summary of all information material to the understanding of the | Refer to body of announcement and Appendix 2. |
| Information | exploration results including a tabulation of the following information | |
| for all Material drill holes: | ||
| easting and northing of the drill hole collar | ||
| elevation or RL (Reduced Level – elevation above sea level in | ||
| metres) of the drill hole collar | ||
| dip and azimuth of the hole | ||
| down hole length and interception depth | ||
| hole length. | ||
| If the exclusion of this information is justified on the basis that the | ||
| information is not Material and this exclusion does not detract from | ||
| the understanding of the report, the Competent Person should | ||
| clearly explain why this is the case. | ||
| Data aggregation methods |
In reporting Exploration Results, weighting averaging techniques, maximum and/or minimum grade truncations (e.g. cutting of high grades) and cut-off grades are usually Material and should be |
Except for Rosemont and McPhillamys, reported intercepts include a minimum of 0.5 g/t Au value over a minimum distance of 1m with a maximum 2m consecutive internal waste. No upper cuts have been applied. |
| stated. | Rosemont: | |
| Reported intercepts include a minimum of 2.5 g/t Au value over a minimum | ||
| Where aggregate intercepts incorporate short lengths of high grade | distance of 1m with a maximum 2m consecutive internal waste. No upper cuts | |
| results and longer lengths of low grade results, the procedure used | have been applied. | |
| for such aggregation should be stated and some typical examples of such aggregations should be shown in detail. |
McPhillamys: Reported intercepts include a minimum of 0.4 g/t Au value over a minimum |
|
| The assumptions used for any reporting of metal equivalent values should be clearly stated. |
distance of 1m with a maximum 6m consecutive internal waste. No upper cuts have been applied. |
Page 31
Quarterly Report to 31 December 2017
==> picture [125 x 37] intentionally omitted <==
| Relationship between mineralisation widths and intercept |
These relationships are particularly important in the reporting of Exploration Results. If the geometry of the mineralisation with respect to the drill hole angle is known, its nature should be reported. |
Rosemont, Baneygo: The Rosemont South drill holes were nominally drilled at -60º to 254° (or 074) and the mineralised zone is sub-vertical. The intercepts reported are close to true width in some cases, and are not true width where the mineralisation is steepest. Reichelts Find: |
|---|---|---|
| lengths | If it is not known and only the down hole lengths are reported, there should be a clear statement to this effect (e.g. ‘down hole length, |
The Reichelts Find drill holes were drilled at -60º to 270° and the mineralised zone is moderately east dipping. The intercepts reported are close to true width. |
| true width not known’). | King John: | |
| The mineralisation is thought to be shallow dipping to the east and reported | ||
| intercepts are interpreted to be near true thickness | ||
| McPhillamys: | ||
| The holes at were drilled at -60º to 270° and the mineralised zone is steeply east | ||
| dipping. The intercepts reported can overstate true widths. | ||
| Discovery Ridge: | ||
| The mineralisation is thought to be near vertical and hence the intercepts reported | ||
| can overstate true widths. | ||
| Diagrams | Appropriate maps and sections (with scales) and tabulations of | Refer to the body of the announcement. |
| intercepts should be included for any significant discovery being | ||
| reported These should include, but not be limited to a plan view of | ||
| drill hole collar locations and appropriate sectional views. | ||
| Balanced | Where comprehensive reporting of all Exploration Results is not | A list of all holes drilled during the quarter attached in Appendix 2. |
| reporting | practicable, representative reporting of both low and high grades | |
| and/or widths should be practiced to avoid misleading reporting of | ||
| Exploration Results. | ||
| Other substantive |
Other exploration data, if meaningful and material, should be reported including (but not limited to): geological observations; |
Rosemont, Reichelts Find: No other material exploration data to report. |
| exploration | geophysical survey results; geochemical survey results; bulk | McPhillamys: |
| data | samples – size and method of treatment; metallurgical test results; bulk density, groundwater, geotechnical and rock characteristics; potential deleterious or contaminating substances. |
The McPhillamys diamond holes were also utilised for bulk density measurements. Geotechnical logging has been completed for determining ground conditions for open pit mining. |
Page 32
Quarterly Report to 31 December 2017
==> picture [125 x 37] intentionally omitted <==
Further work The nature and scale of planned further work (e.g. tests for lateral extensions or depth extensions or large-scale step-out drilling). Diagrams clearly highlighting the areas of possible extensions, including the main geological interpretations and future drilling areas, provided this information is not commercially sensitive.
Rosemont: Drilling will continue during 2018. Baneygo, Reichelts Find, King John, Salt Soak: Infill and where appropriate, extensional drilling will continue in 2018.
McPhillamys:
In addition to sterilisation drilling for infrastructure will continue during the December 2017 quarter, drill programmes are planned for McPhillamys and Discovery Ridge. See diagrams in main text
Page 33
Quarterly Report to 31 December 2017
==> picture [125 x 37] intentionally omitted <==
APPENDIX 2
| APPENDIX 2 | |
|---|---|
| Beamish Collar Location | Intersection >1.0ppm Au and >1g/t Au*m |
| Hole ID Y X Z Dip Azimuth Total Depth (m) |
From (m) To (m) Interval (m) Au (ppm) |
| RRLBMRC015 6909709 436820 510 ‐60 270 84 |
No significant Intercept |
| RRLBMRC016 6909710 436856 509 ‐60 268 120 |
54 58 4 1.6 |
| RRLBMRC017 6909709 436898 508 ‐60 268 144 |
No significant Intercept |
| RRLBMRC018 6909506 436840 513 ‐60 269 108 RRLBMRC018 |
16 18 2 1.64 21 22 1 1.15 |
| RRLBMRC019 6909508 436880 510 ‐60 271 120 |
No significant Intercept |
| RRLBMRC020 6909509 436920 508 ‐60 270 153 |
No significant Intercept |
| RRLBMRC021 6909345 436892 511 ‐60 270 128 RRLBMRC021 |
61 63 2 1.69 70 71 1 1.99 |
| RRLBMRC022 6909344 436934 508 ‐60 271 136 |
No significant Intercept |
| RRLBMRC023 6909190 436910 511 ‐60 271 133 RRLBMRC023 |
65 66 1 1.26 80 81 1 1.63 |
| RRLBMRC024 6909189 436948 508 ‐60 272 163 |
No significant Intercept |
| RRLBMRC025 6909111 436885 514 ‐60 268 93 RRLBMRC025 RRLBMRC025 RRLBMRC025 RRLBMRC025 |
45 47 2 1.22 50 53 3 1.02 56 58 2 2.73 65 66 1 1.21 69 70 1 1.04 |
| RRLBMRC026 6909027 436891 513 ‐60 270 98 RRLBMRC026 RRLBMRC026 |
47 49 2 1.42 54 55 1 1.24 58 60 2 1.13 |
| RRLBMRC027 6909030 436920 515 ‐60 272 120 |
2 4 2 1.41 |
Page 34
Quarterly Report to 31 December 2017
==> picture [125 x 37] intentionally omitted <==
| RRLBMRC027 RRLBMRC027 RRLBMRC027 |
46 52 6 1.32 76 79 3 1.37 83 92 9 2.04 |
|---|---|
| RRLBMRC028 6908870 436879 514 ‐60 268 98 |
No significant Intercept |
| RRLBMRC029 6908869 436920 511 ‐60 270 103 RRLBMRC029 RRLBMRC029 RRLBMRC029 |
1 2 1 1.1 58 62 4 1.62 72 74 2 2.79 77 78 1 1.12 |
| RRLBMRC030 6908870 436960 505 ‐60 270 150 |
No significant Intercept |
| RRLBMRC031 6908620 436900 510 ‐60 268 83 |
No significant Intercept |
| RRLBMRC032 6908620 436940 510 ‐60 271 100 |
No significant Intercept |
| RRLBMRC033 6908620 436980 510 ‐60 270 93 |
No significant Intercept |
| RRLBMRC034 6908620 437020 510 ‐60 268 128 |
No significant Intercept |
| RRLBMRC035 6907460 436300 485 ‐60 272 80 |
No significant Intercept |
| RRLBMRC036 6907460 436380 485 ‐60 269 80 |
No significant Intercept |
| RRLBMRC037 6907460 436620 485 ‐60 270 80 |
No significant Intercept |
| RRLBMRC038 6907460 436780 485 ‐60 268 80 |
No significant Intercept |
| RRLBMRC039 6907460 437020 510 ‐60 268 88 |
47 50 3 3.04 |
| RRLBMRC040 6907460 437180 510 ‐60 265 80 |
No significant Intercept |
| RRLBMRC041 6907460 437340 510 ‐60 269 80 |
No significant Intercept |
| RRLBMRC042 6907460 437420 510 ‐60 268 80 |
No significant Intercept |
| RRLBMRC043 6907700 437030 510 ‐60 272 118 |
No significant Intercept |
| RRLBMRC044 6907900 436900 510 ‐60 270 83 |
46 47 1 3.29 |
| RRLBMRC045 6907900 436980 510 ‐60 270 83 |
52 54 2 1.66 |
| RRLBMRC046 6908100 436720 510 ‐60 273 83 |
No significant Intercept |
Page 35
Quarterly Report to 31 December 2017
==> picture [125 x 37] intentionally omitted <==
| RRLBMRC047 6908100 436800 512 ‐60 271 83 |
No significant Intercept |
|---|---|
| RRLBMRC048 6908100 436880 513 ‐60 270 83 |
No significant Intercept |
| RRLBMRC049 6908100 436960 512 ‐60 269 103 |
No significant Intercept |
| RRLBMRC050 6908220 436500 510 ‐60 274 80 |
No significant Intercept |
| RRLBMRC051 6908820 436420 485 ‐60 269 83 |
No significant Intercept |
| RRLBMRC052 6908810 436690 485 ‐60 269 88 |
No significant Intercept |
| RRLBMRC053 6909820 436180 485 ‐60 272 80 |
No significant Intercept |
| RRLBMRC054 6909620 436260 485 ‐60 270 80 |
No significant Intercept |
| RRLBMRC055 6909820 436340 485 ‐60 269 80 |
No significant Intercept |
| RRLBMRC056 6909820 436420 485 ‐60 270 120 |
No significant Intercept |
| RRLBMRC057 6909280 436600 510 ‐60 272 80 |
No significant Intercept |
| RRLBMRC058 6910100 436340 485 ‐60 270 80 |
No significant Intercept |
| RRLBMRC059 6910100 436340 485 ‐60 270 80 |
No significant Intercept |
| RRLBMRC060 6910100 436500 485 ‐60 270 120 |
No significant Intercept |
| RRLBMRC061 6910410 436800 510 ‐60 268 70 |
No significant Intercept |
| RRLBMRC062 6910410 436840 510 ‐60 269 110 |
No significant Intercept |
| RRLBMRC063 6910410 436880 510 ‐60 272 148 |
No significant Intercept |
| RRLBMRC064 6908100 437040 510 ‐60 270 138 |
No significant Intercept |
| RRLBMRC065 6909192 436884 514 ‐60 269 90 RRLBMRC065 |
15 16 1 1.2 57 58 1 2.39 |
| RRLBMRC066 6909029 436957 507 ‐60 269 158 RRLBMRC066 RRLBMRC066 |
108 114 6 1.63 122 123 1 1.06 125 128 3 1.31 |
| RRLBMRC067 6910903 436788 510 ‐60 270 96 |
No significant Intercept |
| RRLBMRC068 6910903 436828 510 ‐60 270 120 |
No significant Intercept |
Page 36
Quarterly Report to 31 December 2017
==> picture [125 x 37] intentionally omitted <==
| RRLBMRC069 6910903 436868 510 ‐60 268 132 |
No significant Intercept |
|---|---|
| RRLBMRC070 6910903 436908 510 ‐60 268 162 |
No significant Intercept |
| RRLBMRC071 6910743 436789 510 ‐60 269 84 |
No significant Intercept |
| RRLBMRC072 6910743 436829 510 ‐60 269 126 |
No significant Intercept |
| RRLBMRC073 6910743 436869 510 ‐60 269 162 |
No significant Intercept |
| RRLBMRC074 6910743 436909 510 ‐60 269 186 RRLBMRC074 |
108 112 4 2.5 116 120 4 1.32 |
| RRLBMRC075 6910583 436789 510 ‐60 270 84 |
No significant Intercept |
| RRLBMRC104 6909070 436880 515 ‐60 269 150 RRLBMRC104 RRLBMRC104 RRLBMRC104 |
35 36 1 1.25 41 42 1 1.57 44 45 1 1 57 58 1 1.97 |
| RRLBMRC105 6909070 436920 512 ‐60 268 123 RRLBMRC105 |
44 45 1 1 80 88 8 1.55 |
| RRLBMRC106 6909070 436960 510 ‐60 270 168 RRLBMRC106 |
115 116 1 1.62 142 143 1 2.38 |
| RRLBMRC107 6909189 436843 512 ‐90 0 73 RRLBMRC107 RRLBMRC107 |
20 21 1 2.42 53 54 1 2.32 61 62 1 1.02 |
| RRLBMRC108 6909111 436843 514 ‐90 0 80 RRLBMRC108 |
22 23 1 1.75 27 28 1 1.26 |
| RRLBMRC109 6909030 436850 513 ‐90 0 73 RRLBMRC109 RRLBMRC109 |
2 4 2 1.25 9 20 11 1.19 24 25 1 3.5 |
| RRLBMRC110 6908990 436880 510 ‐60 268 83 |
No significant Intercept |
Page 37
Quarterly Report to 31 December 2017
==> picture [125 x 37] intentionally omitted <==
| RRLBMRC111 6908990 436920 510 ‐60 270 128 RRLBMRC111 RRLBMRC111 RRLBMRC111 RRLBMRC111 RRLBMRC111 RRLBMRC111 RRLBMRC111 RRLBMRC111 RRLBMRC111 RRLBMRC111 |
1 4 3 1.27 42 43 1 1.15 45 46 1 1.06 47 48 1 1.46 56 57 1 1.08 62 63 1 1.04 73 74 1 1.16 77 79 2 1.26 81 82 1 1.12 86 87 1 1.22 90 91 1 1.13 |
|---|---|
| RRLBMRC112 6908990 436880 510 ‐60 269 13 |
4 5 1 1.03 |
| RRLBMRC113 6908780 436880 510 ‐60 269 83 |
21 22 1 2.31 |
| RRLBMRC114 6908780 436920 510 ‐60 271 113 |
2 3 1 1.29 |
| RRLBMRC115 6908780 436960 510 ‐60 271 148 RRLBMRC115 |
88 89 1 1.29 93 94 1 1.69 |
| Butcher Well Collar Location | Intersection >1.0ppm Au and >1g/t Au*m |
| Hole ID Y X Z Dip Azimuth Total Depth (m) |
From (m) To (m) Interval (m) Au (ppm) |
| RRLBWAC158 6928710 435380 520 ‐60 270 56 |
No significant Intercept |
| RRLBWAC159 6928710 435460 520 ‐60 273 92 |
No significant Intercept |
| RRLBWAC160 6928710 435540 520 ‐60 270 116 |
No significant Intercept |
| RRLBWAC161 6928710 435620 520 ‐60 271 76 |
No significant Intercept |
| RRLBWAC162 6928710 435700 510 ‐60 270 43 |
No significant Intercept |
| RRLBWAC163 6928710 435780 520 ‐60 270 95 |
No significant Intercept |
Page 38
Quarterly Report to 31 December 2017
==> picture [125 x 37] intentionally omitted <==
| RRLBWAC164 6928710 435860 520 ‐60 270 59 |
No significant Intercept |
|---|---|
| RRLBWAC165 6928710 435940 520 ‐60 270 56 |
No significant Intercept |
| Baneygo Collar Location | Intersection >1.0ppm Au and >1g/t Au*m |
| Hole ID Y X Z Dip Azimuth Total Depth (m) |
From (m) To (m) Interval (m) Au (ppm) |
| RRLBYRC380 6904891 432678 503 ‐60 253 30 |
No significant Intercept |
| RRLBYRC381 6904898 432700 503 ‐60 255 55 |
23 24 1 1.95 |
| RRLBYRC382 6904906 432674 503 ‐60 254 42 |
28 29 1 5.73 |
| RRLBYRC383 6904913 432694 503 ‐60 254 60 |
41 44 3 5.17 |
| RRLBYRC384 6904919 432712 502 ‐60 254 102 |
No significant Intercept |
| RRLBYRC385 6904947 432668 503 ‐60 254 48 |
No significant Intercept |
| RRLBYRC386 6904950 432682 503 ‐60 254 60 |
32 37 5 1.59 |
| RRLBYRC387 6904955 432702 502 ‐60 254 96 |
No significant Intercept |
| RRLBYRC388 6904983 432658 504 ‐60 253 54 |
No significant Intercept |
| RRLBYRC389 6904988 432674 503 ‐60 254 78 RRLBYRC389 RRLBYRC389 |
29 32 3 7.46 49 50 1 14.5 58 59 1 2.74 |
| RRLBYRC390 6905022 432644 504 ‐60 254 48 |
11 12 1 21 |
| RRLBYRC391 6905026 432660 503 ‐60 254 84 |
46 48 2 1.5 |
| RRLBYRC392 6905035 432679 502 ‐60 254 114 RRLBYRC392 RRLBYRC392 RRLBYRC392 RRLBYRC392 |
52 53 1 1.3 60 65 5 5.33 69 70 1 1.35 81 82 1 1.56 84 85 1 1.27 |
| RRLBYRC393 6905065 432635 504 ‐60 254 42 |
No significant Intercept |
Page 39
Quarterly Report to 31 December 2017
==> picture [125 x 37] intentionally omitted <==
| RRLBYRC394 6905070 432654 503 ‐60 254 72 RRLBYRC394 |
30 32 2 2.04 36 37 1 5.62 |
|---|---|
| RRLBYRC395 6905074 432671 502 ‐60 254 96 |
No significant Intercept |
| RRLBYRC396 6905103 432627 503 ‐60 254 46 |
No significant Intercept |
| RRLBYRC397 6905111 432643 502 ‐60 254 60 RRLBYRC397 RRLBYRC397 |
31 32 1 1.67 39 40 1 1.26 43 44 1 1.4 |
| RRLBYRC398 6905122 432630 502 ‐60 254 48 |
No significant Intercept |
| RRLBYRC399 6905133 432657 501 ‐60 254 72 |
49 50 1 1.2 |
| RRLBYRC400 6905145 432633 502 ‐60 254 54 |
24 25 1 2.7 |
| RRLBYRC401 6905157 432670 500 ‐60 254 132 RRLBYRC401 |
81 82 1 3.5 116 117 1 1.09 |
| RRLBYRC402 6905201 432616 501 ‐60 254 54 RRLBYRC402 |
42 43 1 1.35 52 53 1 1.34 |
| RRLBYRC403 6905209 432640 500 ‐60 254 72 |
61 62 1 1.19 |
| RRLBYRC404 6905286 432624 500 ‐60 256 114 |
90 96 6 1.95 |
| RRLBYRC405 6905283 432601 501 ‐60 255 84 RRLBYRC405 RRLBYRC405 |
46 47 1 1.26 56 57 1 1.26 61 62 1 1.16 |
| RRLBYRC406 6907060 432052 500 ‐60 255 30 |
No significant Intercept |
| RRLBYRC407 6907065 432070 500 ‐60 254 54 |
No significant Intercept |
| RRLBYRC408 6907071 432092 500 ‐60 254 78 |
56 57 1 2.21 |
| RRLBYRC409 6907077 432110 499 ‐60 254 111 |
70 74 4 2.16 |
| RRLBYRC410 6907099 432045 500 ‐60 254 36 |
No significant Intercept |
| RRLBYRC411 6907103 432063 500 ‐60 253 60 |
32 33 1 1.08 |
Page 40
Quarterly Report to 31 December 2017
==> picture [125 x 37] intentionally omitted <==
| RRLBYRC411 | 34 35 1 1.15 |
|---|---|
| RRLBYRC412 6907108 432082 499 ‐60 253 84 RRLBYRC412 |
58 60 2 6.2 73 74 1 1.3 |
| RRLBYRC413 6907114 432104 499 ‐60 253 114 |
81 92 11 2.19 |
| RRLBYRC414 6907130 432019 500 ‐60 254 30 |
No significant Intercept |
| RRLBYRC415 6907135 432037 500 ‐60 254 54 |
18 19 1 2.56 |
| RRLBYRC416 6907152 432083 499 ‐60 253 120 |
88 98 10 1.82 |
| RRLBYRC417 6907140 432058 499 ‐60 252 90 |
38 54 16 17.29 |
| RRLBYRC418 6907413 431970 498 ‐60 254 90 RRLBYRC418 |
54 55 1 5.42 72 74 2 1.52 |
| RRLBYRC419 6907417 431989 497 ‐60 258 126 RRLBYRC419 |
79 80 1 1.52 96 99 3 18.54 |
| RRLBYRC420 6907749 431911 492 ‐60 254 168 RRLBYRC420 RRLBYRC420 RRLBYRC420 |
129 130 1 1.42 134 135 1 1.98 137 138 1 1.38 142 143 1 4.82 |
| RRLBYRC421 6907785 431901 491 ‐60 254 168 |
143 145 2 3.58 |
| RRLBYRC422 6907824 431811 494 ‐60 255 54 |
36 44 8 3.37 |
| RRLBYRC423 6907832 431830 493 ‐60 254 90 |
74 75 1 2.08 |
| RRLBYRC424 6907864 431818 492 ‐60 255 96 |
61 63 2 1.1 |
| RRLBYRC425 6905539 432558 494 ‐60 257 60 |
No significant Intercept |
| RRLBYRC426 6905545 432575 494 ‐60 257 90 RRLBYRC426 RRLBYRC426 |
18 19 1 2.75 35 36 1 1.7 43 44 1 1.59 |
| RRLBYRC427 6905577 432547 493 ‐60 253 66 |
1 2 1 1.23 |
Page 41
Quarterly Report to 31 December 2017
==> picture [125 x 37] intentionally omitted <==
| RRLBYRC428 6905585 432568 493 ‐60 254 102 RRLBYRC428 |
28 29 1 2.78 43 47 4 1.45 |
|---|---|
| RRLBYRC429 6905616 432536 492 ‐60 253 60 |
44 45 1 5.25 |
| RRLBYRC430 6905622 432556 492 ‐60 253 100 |
29 34 5 1.53 |
| RRLBYRC431 6905628 432572 491 ‐60 254 132 RRLBYRC431 |
74 75 1 1.22 100 101 1 1.14 |
| RRLBYRC432 6905652 432519 491 ‐60 254 54 |
No significant Intercept |
| RRLBYRC433 6905657 432540 491 ‐60 253 108 RRLBYRC433 RRLBYRC433 RRLBYRC433 |
30 31 1 1.86 39 41 2 1.53 44 45 1 1.38 78 79 1 2.5 |
| RRLBYRC434 6905663 432556 491 ‐60 254 162 RRLBYRC434 |
72 73 1 5.42 82 83 1 1.32 |
| RRLBYRC435 6905700 432525 490 ‐60 254 114 RRLBYRC435 RRLBYRC435 RRLBYRC435 |
15 16 1 2.06 38 41 3 6.08 46 48 2 1.4 69 70 1 1.28 |
| RRLBYRC436 6905694 432502 490 ‐60 254 60 |
29 30 1 1.22 |
| RRLBYRC437 6905704 432548 491 ‐60 253 168 |
80 81 1 7.53 |
| RRLBYRC438 6905723 432474 491 ‐60 254 36 |
No significant Intercept |
| RRLBYRC439 6905729 432495 491 ‐60 254 66 RRLBYRC439 RRLBYRC439 |
7 8 1 1.08 22 26 4 1.4 34 35 1 1.02 |
| RRLBYRC440 6905739 432533 491 ‐60 254 156 RRLBYRC440 |
85 86 1 2.58 91 94 3 4.25 |
| RRLBYRC441 6905763 432470 492 ‐60 254 66 |
6 7 1 1.01 |
Page 42
Quarterly Report to 31 December 2017
==> picture [125 x 37] intentionally omitted <==
| RRLBYRC441 RRLBYRC441 |
14 17 3 6.92 33 34 1 1.14 |
|---|---|
| RRLBYRC442 6905767 432487 492 ‐60 254 114 RRLBYRC442 |
26 27 1 1.34 35 51 16 2.01 |
| RRLBYRC443 6905773 432512 492 ‐60 255 180 RRLBYRC443 RRLBYRC443 |
101 102 1 4.48 115 116 1 20.7 132 133 1 6.25 |
| RRLBYRC444 6905590 432584 493 ‐60 253 156 |
72 74 2 6.77 |
| RRLBYRC445 6905551 432594 494 ‐60 254 132 RRLBYRC445 |
61 62 1 2.95 88 89 1 2.75 |
| RRLBYRC446 6905480 432571 496 ‐60 253 66 RRLBYRC446 RRLBYRC446 RRLBYRC446 RRLBYRC446 |
19 20 1 1.12 34 35 1 1.42 41 42 1 2.73 45 46 1 2.1 49 50 1 3.44 |
| RRLBYRC447 6905436 432562 498 ‐60 255 60 |
No significant Intercept |
| RRLBYRC448 6905441 432583 497 ‐60 254 96 RRLBYRC448 RRLBYRC448 RRLBYRC448 RRLBYRC448 |
40 41 1 8.24 47 48 1 1.5 51 52 1 2.01 55 56 1 7.14 80 81 1 2.06 |
| RRLBYRC449 6905446 432603 497 ‐60 253 114 RRLBYRC449 |
62 63 1 1.13 103 104 1 2.49 |
| RRLBYRC450 6905400 432582 499 ‐60 254 66 RRLBYRC450 |
16 17 1 1.01 24 25 1 2.21 |
| RRLBYRC451 6905356 432577 501 ‐60 254 42 |
No significant Intercept |
Page 43
Quarterly Report to 31 December 2017
==> picture [125 x 37] intentionally omitted <==
| RRLBYRC452 6905360 432594 500 ‐60 253 66 |
No significant Intercept |
|---|---|
| RRLBYRC453 6905366 432614 499 ‐60 253 84 |
49 50 1 1 |
| RRLBYRC454 6907791 431838 494 ‐60 253 78 |
55 59 4 1.43 |
| RRLBYRC455 6906968 432087 502 ‐60 254 54 |
No significant Intercept |
| RRLBYRC456 6906976 432109 501 ‐60 254 66 |
No significant Intercept |
| Coopers Collar Location | Intersection >1.0ppm Au and >1g/t Au*m |
| Hole ID Y X Z Dip Azimuth Total Depth (m) |
From (m) To (m) Interval (m) Au (ppm) |
| RRLCPRC077 6934719 434816 560 ‐60 270 80 |
40 46 6 2.64 |
| RRLCPRC078 6934679 434860 561 ‐60 269 100 |
72 78 6 3.4 |
| RRLCPRC079 6934295 434950 561 ‐60 270 118 RRLCPRC079 |
37 38 1 1.3 95 101 6 3.08 |
| RRLCPRC080 6934266 434983 561 ‐60 270 133 RRLCPRC080 RRLCPRC080 |
39 40 1 1.1 54 55 1 1.63 118 119 1 3.92 |
| RRLCPRC081 6934240 434936 561 ‐60 269 93 |
75 77 2 5.23 |
| RRLCPRC082 6934239 434955 562 ‐60 270 113 |
21 22 1 10.4 |
| RRLCPRC083 6934217 434959 562 ‐60 270 108 |
No significant Intercept |
| Cuthbert Bore Collar Location | Intersection >1.0ppm Au and >1g/t Au*m |
| Hole ID Y X Z Dip Azimuth Total Depth (m) |
From (m) To (m) Interval (m) Au (ppm) |
| RRLCUAC001 6901000 425360 500 ‐60 270 26 |
No significant Intercept |
| RRLCUAC002 6901000 425440 500 ‐60 274 35 |
No significant Intercept |
| RRLCUAC003 6901000 425520 500 ‐60 270 84 |
No significant Intercept |
| RRLCUAC004 6901000 425600 500 ‐60 270 77 |
No significant Intercept |
Page 44
Quarterly Report to 31 December 2017
==> picture [125 x 37] intentionally omitted <==
| RRLCUAC005 6901000 425760 500 ‐60 268 56 |
No significant Intercept |
|---|---|
| RRLCUAC006 6901000 425920 500 ‐60 270 87 |
No significant Intercept |
| RRLCUAC007 6901000 426080 500 ‐60 270 34 |
No significant Intercept |
| RRLCUAC008 6900700 425500 500 ‐60 269 40 |
No significant Intercept |
| RRLCUAC009 6900700 425540 500 ‐60 267 40 |
No significant Intercept |
| RRLCUAC010 6900700 425580 500 ‐60 267 66 |
No significant Intercept |
| RRLCUAC011 6900700 425620 500 ‐60 270 51 |
No significant Intercept |
| RRLCUAC012 6900700 425660 500 ‐60 268 93 |
No significant Intercept |
| RRLCUAC013 6900700 425700 500 ‐60 270 84 |
No significant Intercept |
| RRLCUAC014 6900700 425740 500 ‐60 270 67 |
No significant Intercept |
| RRLCUAC015 6900600 425657 500 ‐60 268 42 |
No significant Intercept |
| RRLCUAC016 6900600 425700 500 ‐60 268 69 |
No significant Intercept |
| RRLCUAC017 6900600 425740 500 ‐60 267 52 |
No significant Intercept |
| RRLCUAC018 6900600 425900 500 ‐60 270 29 |
No significant Intercept |
| RRLCUAC019 6900600 426060 500 ‐60 270 52 |
No significant Intercept |
| RRLCUAC020 6900600 426220 500 ‐60 270 78 |
No significant Intercept |
| RRLCUAC021 6900500 425650 500 ‐60 272 38 |
No significant Intercept |
| RRLCUAC022 6900500 425690 500 ‐60 268 62 |
No significant Intercept |
| RRLCUAC023 6900500 425730 500 ‐60 270 97 |
No significant Intercept |
| RRLCUAC024 6900500 425770 500 ‐60 268 72 |
No significant Intercept |
| RRLCUAC025 6900500 425810 500 ‐60 270 48 |
No significant Intercept |
| RRLCUAC026 6900200 425760 500 ‐60 267 13 |
No significant Intercept |
| RRLCUAC027 6900200 425840 500 ‐60 269 37 |
No significant Intercept |
| RRLCUAC028 6900200 425920 500 ‐60 267 46 |
No significant Intercept |
Page 45
Quarterly Report to 31 December 2017
==> picture [125 x 37] intentionally omitted <==
| RRLCUAC029 6900200 426000 500 ‐60 270 45 |
No significant Intercept |
|---|---|
| RRLCUAC030 6900200 426160 500 ‐60 267 19 |
No significant Intercept |
| Dogbolter Collar Location | Intersection >1.0ppm Au and >1g/t Au*m |
| Hole ID Y X Z Dip Azimuth Total Depth (m) |
From (m) To (m) Interval (m) Au (ppm) |
| RRLDBRC161 6933401 435005 566 ‐60 256 58 RRLDBRC161 RRLDBRC161 RRLDBRC161 |
13 16 3 1.21 26 28 2 1.14 30 31 1 1.05 35 36 1 1.42 |
| RRLDBRC162 6933408 435020 566 ‐60 256 78 |
39 40 1 1.06 |
| RRLDBRC163 6933414 435040 565 ‐60 256 83 RRLDBRC163 |
37 38 1 1.14 46 47 1 1.36 |
| RRLDBRC164 6933384 435009 566 ‐60 256 63 RRLDBRC164 |
15 17 2 1.44 59 61 2 1.76 |
| RRLDBRC165 6933389 435027 566 ‐60 256 68 RRLDBRC165 RRLDBRC165 RRLDBRC165 |
28 32 4 6.25 45 46 1 1.06 50 51 1 1.18 60 61 1 1.22 |
| RRLDBRC166 6933363 435003 566 ‐60 256 58 RRLDBRC166 |
7 8 1 1.9 27 28 1 1.4 |
| RRLDBRC167 6933368 435025 566 ‐60 256 100 RRLDBRC167 |
22 24 2 3.94 29 30 1 1.65 |
| RRLDBRC168 6933372 435044 566 ‐60 256 78 RRLDBRC168 RRLDBRC168 RRLDBRC168 |
43 47 4 3.67 55 56 1 1.03 61 62 1 1.14 67 68 1 1.37 |
Page 46
Quarterly Report to 31 December 2017
==> picture [125 x 37] intentionally omitted <==
| RRLDBRC169 6933329 435035 566 ‐60 255 63 |
42 46 4 2.13 |
|---|---|
| RRLDBRC170 6933334 435053 567 ‐60 256 73 RRLDBRC170 |
48 49 1 1.02 55 56 1 1.59 |
| RRLDBRC171 6933141 435009 568 ‐60 256 93 RRLDBRC171 |
25 26 1 3.98 61 64 3 23.23 |
| RRLDBRC172 6933084 434940 569 ‐60 256 63 |
25 34 9 1.56 |
| RRLDBRC173 6933090 434960 568 ‐60 256 93 RRLDBRC173 |
23 24 1 1.01 61 75 14 2.54 |
| RRLDBRC174 6933106 435027 568 ‐60 254 93 RRLDBRC174 RRLDBRC174 |
38 39 1 5.85 51 52 1 4.82 63 64 1 3.1 |
| RRLDBRC175 6933060 435029 568 ‐60 255 83 |
77 78 1 1.01 |
| RRLDBRC176 6933069 435064 567 ‐60 256 83 RRLDBRC176 RRLDBRC176 |
22 27 5 3.66 30 31 1 3.82 63 66 3 1.48 |
| RRLDBRC177 6932974 434915 570 ‐60 256 43 |
27 31 4 3.3 |
| RRLDBRC178 6932978 434934 569 ‐60 255 63 RRLDBRC178 RRLDBRC178 |
23 25 2 2.27 29 31 2 7.61 35 47 12 2.42 |
| RRLDBRC179 6932982 434953 569 ‐60 255 93 |
59 65 6 1.37 |
| RRLDBRC180 6932986 434975 569 ‐60 256 103 RRLDBRC180 RRLDBRC180 RRLDBRC180 |
35 36 1 1.22 81 85 4 2.53 91 92 1 2.06 95 100 5 2.71 |
| RRLDBRC181 6932955 434909 570 ‐60 257 43 |
8 23 15 22.13 |
| RRLDBRC182 6932959 434926 570 ‐60 256 53 |
24 25 1 1.71 |
Page 47
Quarterly Report to 31 December 2017
==> picture [125 x 37] intentionally omitted <==
| RRLDBRC182 RRLDBRC182 |
32 33 1 4.06 39 40 1 3.02 |
|---|---|
| RRLDBRC183 6932963 434944 570 ‐60 256 83 |
43 51 8 2.23 |
| RRLDBRC184 6932935 434924 570 ‐60 256 43 |
18 24 6 1.63 |
| RRLDBRC185 6932940 434942 570 ‐60 255 68 |
47 52 5 2.41 |
| RRLDBRC186 6932912 434916 570 ‐60 255 38 RRLDBRC186 |
9 10 1 2.06 16 17 1 4.92 |
| RRLDBRC187 6932918 434937 570 ‐60 256 63 RRLDBRC187 |
11 12 1 1.35 39 40 1 1.03 |
| Discovery Ridge Collar Location | Intersection >1.0ppm Au and >1g/t Au*m |
| Hole ID Y X Z Dip Azimuth Total Depth (m) |
From (m) To (m) Interval (m) Au (ppm) |
| RRLDRRC001 6270882 694503 757 ‐55 240 120 RRLDRRC001 RRLDRRC001 |
3 14 11 1.25 24 25 1 1.06 29 30 1 1.46 |
| RRLDRRC002 6270826 694606 765 ‐60 240 130 RRLDRRC002 RRLDRRC002 RRLDRRC002 |
12 13 1 1.07 27 30 3 1.36 76 77 1 3.33 100 101 1 1.89 |
| RRLDRRC003 6270825 694467 747 ‐60 240 90 RRLDRRC003 |
17 35 18 2.73 53 54 1 2.61 |
| RRLDRRC004 6270811 694473 747 ‐60 240 90 RRLDRRC004 RRLDRRC004 RRLDRRC004 RRLDRRC004 |
47 48 1 1.08 52 53 1 8.18 59 60 1 1.32 70 71 1 1.04 79 80 1 1.32 |
Page 48
Quarterly Report to 31 December 2017
==> picture [125 x 37] intentionally omitted <==
| RRLDRRC005 6270791 694479 746 ‐60 240 110 RRLDRRC005 |
81 82 1 1.04 105 106 1 2.2 |
|---|---|
| RRLDRRC017 6270937 694615 750 ‐60 240 140 RRLDRRC017 RRLDRRC017 RRLDRRC017 RRLDRRC017 RRLDRRC017 |
23 25 2 2.21 59 60 1 2.07 78 79 1 1.1 89 90 1 1.01 93 116 23 2.47 119 140 21 2.71 |
| RRLDRRCD006 6270975 694815 771 ‐65 240 54 |
No significant Intercept |
| RRLDRRCD007 6270854 694629 763 ‐60 240 80 |
54 55 1 1.16 |
| RRLDRRCD008 6270876 694596 760 ‐65 244 71 RRLDRRCD008 RRLDRRCD008 |
14 15 1 1.17 35 40 5 1.11 61 62 1 1.14 |
| RRLDRRCD009 6270880 694579 759 ‐65 240 90 RRLDRRCD009 RRLDRRCD009 |
31 32 1 1.89 37 38 1 2.05 43 44 1 2.25 |
| RRLDRRCD010 6270924 694586 754 ‐65 240 70 RRLDRRCD010 |
12 13 1 2.93 44 69 25 2.38 |
| RRLDRRCD011 6271119 694757 750 ‐60 242 96 |
No significant Intercept |
| RRLDRRCD012 6270976 694617 745 ‐67 240 90 RRLDRRCD012 |
68 69 1 1.55 80 81 1 3.98 |
| RRLDRRCD013 6271182 694674 746 ‐60 240 70 |
No significant Intercept |
| RRLDRRCD014 6270972 694535 750 ‐65 240 70 RRLDRRCD014 RRLDRRCD014 RRLDRRCD014 |
2 13 11 3.29 26 28 2 1.78 32 40 8 1.01 62 63 1 1.23 |
Page 49
Quarterly Report to 31 December 2017
==> picture [125 x 37] intentionally omitted <==
| RRLDRRCD015 6270959 694559 750 ‐67 240 90 RRLDRRCD015 RRLDRRCD015 RRLDRRCD015 |
1 4 3 1.13 29 50 21 1.86 58 82 24 2.22 85 88 3 1.98 |
|---|---|
| RRLDRRCD016 6270971 694558 750 ‐72 240 90 RRLDRRCD016 RRLDRRCD016 |
3 6 3 1.17 66 67 1 1.64 71 90 19 2.09 |
| Erlistoun Collar Location | Intersection >1.0ppm Au and >1g/t Au*m |
| Hole ID Y X Z Dip Azimuth Total Depth (m) |
From (m) To (m) Interval (m) Au (ppm) |
| RRLERLRC967 6906100 434911 478 ‐60 90 60 |
40 45 5 4.29 |
| RRLERLRC968 6906100 434891 478 ‐60 90 64 |
49 51 2 2.89 |
| RRLERLRC969 6906100 434870 478 ‐60 90 68 |
46 52 6 2.88 |
| Garden Well Collar Location | Intersection >1.0ppm Au and >1g/t Au*m |
| Hole ID Y X Z Dip Azimuth Total Depth (m) |
From (m) To (m) Interval (m) Au (ppm) |
| RRLGDRC566 6911280 437129 492 ‐60 270 306 RRLGDRC566 RRLGDRC566 RRLGDRC566 |
87 91 4 1.02 120 121 1 1.03 157 159 2 1.89 235 236 1 1.59 |
| King John Collar Location | Intersection >1.0ppm Au and >1g/t Au*m |
| Hole ID Y X Z Dip Azimuth Total Depth (m) |
From (m) To (m) Interval (m) Au (ppm) |
| RRLKJAC001 6914539 424663 495 ‐60 247 83 |
No significant Intercept |
| RRLKJAC002 6914570 424736 495 ‐60 246 120 |
No significant Intercept |
Page 50
Quarterly Report to 31 December 2017
==> picture [125 x 37] intentionally omitted <==
| RRLKJAC003 6914601 424810 495 ‐60 247 89 |
No significant Intercept |
|---|---|
| RRLKJAC004 6914633 424884 495 ‐60 247 83 |
No significant Intercept |
| RRLKJAC005 6914664 424957 495 ‐60 248 103 |
No significant Intercept |
| RRLKJAC006 6914695 425031 495 ‐60 247 140 |
No significant Intercept |
| RRLKJAC007 6914758 425178 495 ‐60 247 80 |
No significant Intercept |
| RRLKJAC008 6914820 425325 495 ‐60 247 122 |
116 120 4 1.07 |
| RRLKJAC009 6914717 424674 495 ‐60 246 70 |
No significant Intercept |
| RRLKJAC010 6914749 424747 495 ‐60 247 68 |
No significant Intercept |
| RRLKJAC011 6914780 424821 495 ‐60 249 59 |
No significant Intercept |
| RRLKJAC012 6914842 424968 495 ‐60 243 108 |
No significant Intercept |
| RRLKJAC013 6914905 425116 495 ‐60 247 66 |
No significant Intercept |
| RRLKJAC014 6914967 425263 495 ‐60 248 139 |
No significant Intercept |
| RRLKJAC015 6914789 425252 495 ‐60 246 128 |
No significant Intercept |
| RRLKJAC016 6914958 424832 495 ‐60 245 71 |
No significant Intercept |
| RRLKJAC017 6914990 424906 495 ‐60 247 99 |
No significant Intercept |
| RRLKJAC018 6915021 424979 495 ‐60 245 64 |
No significant Intercept |
| RRLKJAC019 6915052 425053 495 ‐60 247 70 |
No significant Intercept |
| RRLKJAC020 6915083 425127 495 ‐60 248 126 |
No significant Intercept |
| RRLKJAC022 6916260 423940 495 ‐60 272 94 |
No significant Intercept |
| RRLKJAC023 6916260 424100 495 ‐60 270 82 |
No significant Intercept |
| RRLKJAC024 6916260 424260 495 ‐60 273 121 |
No significant Intercept |
| RRLKJAC025 6914936 434420 495 ‐60 272 74 |
No significant Intercept |
| RRLKJAC026 6916260 424580 495 ‐60 267 111 |
No significant Intercept |
| RRLKJAC027 6916260 424740 495 ‐60 272 98 |
No significant Intercept |
Page 51
Quarterly Report to 31 December 2017
==> picture [125 x 37] intentionally omitted <==
| RRLKJAC028 6916260 424900 495 ‐60 268 83 |
No significant Intercept |
|---|---|
| RRLKJAC029 6916260 425060 495 ‐60 270 85 |
No significant Intercept |
| RRLKJAC030 6916260 425220 495 ‐60 270 85 |
No significant Intercept |
| RRLKJAC031 6916260 425380 495 ‐60 272 101 |
No significant Intercept |
| RRLKJAC032 6916260 425540 495 ‐60 270 104 |
No significant Intercept |
| RRLKJAC033 6916580 423780 495 ‐60 270 78 |
No significant Intercept |
| RRLKJAC034 6916580 423940 495 ‐60 270 79 |
No significant Intercept |
| RRLKJAC035 6916580 424100 495 ‐60 271 129 |
No significant Intercept |
| RRLKJAC036 6916580 424260 495 ‐60 270 76 |
No significant Intercept |
| RRLKJAC037 6916580 424420 495 69 270 63 |
No significant Intercept |
| RRLKJAC038 6916580 424580 495 ‐60 270 78 |
No significant Intercept |
| RRLKJAC039 6916580 424740 495 ‐60 268 83 |
No significant Intercept |
| RRLKJAC040 6916580 424900 495 ‐60 271 65 |
No significant Intercept |
| RRLKJAC041 6916580 425060 495 ‐60 271 89 |
No significant Intercept |
| RRLKJAC042 6916580 425220 495 ‐60 270 147 |
No significant Intercept |
| RRLKJAC043 6916580 425380 495 ‐60 270 151 |
No significant Intercept |
| RRLKJAC044 6916580 425140 495 ‐60 270 78 |
No significant Intercept |
| RRLKJAC045 6916260 424180 495 ‐60 271 89 |
No significant Intercept |
| RRLKJAC046 6916260 425300 495 ‐60 270 45 |
No significant Intercept |
| RRLKJCAC021 6914936 425189 495 ‐60 247 90 |
No significant Intercept |
| RRLKJRC019 6911694 426190 493 ‐60 247 103 |
No significant Intercept |
| RRLKJRC020 6911702 426209 493 ‐60 247 113 |
62 63 1 2.73 |
| RRLKJRC021 6911710 426227 493 ‐60 247 128 |
93 94 1 1.74 |
| RRLKJRC022 6911718 426245 493 ‐60 247 128 |
No significant Intercept |
Page 52
Quarterly Report to 31 December 2017
==> picture [125 x 37] intentionally omitted <==
| RRLKJRC023 6911726 426264 493 ‐60 247 143 RRLKJRC023 |
54 55 1 1.18 127 128 1 1.34 |
|---|---|
| RRLKJRC024 6911731 426175 493 ‐60 248 83 |
12 13 1 1.53 |
| RRLKJRC025 6911739 426193 493 ‐60 246 103 RRLKJRC025 |
28 31 3 1.53 39 40 1 1.31 |
| RRLKJRC026 6911747 426211 493 ‐60 246 123 RRLKJRC026 |
49 51 2 7.18 88 94 6 17.43 |
| RRLKJRC027 6911755 426230 493 ‐60 247 133 RRLKJRC027 RRLKJRC027 |
76 77 1 1.42 110 111 1 3.29 123 125 2 1.85 |
| RRLKJRC028 6911763 426248 493 ‐60 247 141 RRLKJRC028 |
83 84 1 3.33 125 126 1 6.88 |
| RRLKJRC029 6911843 426131 493 ‐60 246 93 |
51 52 1 1.3 |
| RRLKJRC030 6911851 426150 493 ‐60 247 114 RRLKJRC030 |
50 53 3 2.49 87 88 1 1.19 |
| RRLKJRC031 6911895 426168 493 ‐60 248 134 RRLKJRC031 RRLKJRC031 |
59 63 4 11.86 69 70 1 1.03 116 118 2 1.98 |
| RRLKJRC032 6911867 426186 493 ‐60 246 144 RRLKJRC032 RRLKJRC032 |
52 58 6 2.36 64 84 20 2.29 93 94 1 5.86 |
| RRLKJRC033 6911874 426205 493 ‐60 246 154 RRLKJRC033 |
73 76 3 3.17 98 105 7 1.86 |
| RRLKJRC034 6911882 426223 493 ‐60 248 154 RRLKJRC034 RRLKJRC034 |
53 55 2 1.86 75 78 3 1.54 91 93 2 17.04 |
Page 53
Quarterly Report to 31 December 2017
==> picture [125 x 37] intentionally omitted <==
| RRLKJRC034 RRLKJRC034 |
117 119 2 4.25 134 135 1 2.7 |
|---|---|
| RRLKJRC035 6911890 426242 493 ‐60 248 163 RRLKJRC035 RRLKJRC035 |
78 85 7 2.42 113 114 1 10.9 132 138 6 2.33 |
| RRLKJRC036 6911898 426260 493 ‐60 248 158 |
133 134 1 1.44 |
| RRLKJRC037 6911906 426260 493 ‐60 248 173 |
147 148 1 1.3 |
| RRLKJRC038 6911933 426137 493 ‐60 247 98 |
No significant Intercept |
| RRLKJRC039 6911941 426156 493 ‐60 247 108 |
No significant Intercept |
| McPhillamys Collar Location | Intersection >1.0ppm Au and >1g/t Au*m |
| Hole ID Y X Z Dip Azimuth Total Depth (m) |
From (m) To (m) Interval (m) Au (ppm) |
| RRLMPDD210 6292222 715856 972 ‐58 263 171 RRLMPDD210 RRLMPDD210 RRLMPDD210 RRLMPDD210 RRLMPDD210 RRLMPDD210 RRLMPDD210 |
0 0.5 0.5 1.46 59.3 62.1 2.8 2.34 68 69.2 1.2 1.3 77.9 87 9.1 1.58 93.05 103 9.95 2.01 109 120 11 1.23 129 134 5 2.7 143 144 1 1.36 |
| RRLMPDD211 6292193 715870 975 ‐60 248 182 RRLMPDD211 RRLMPDD211 RRLMPDD211 RRLMPDD211 RRLMPDD211 |
28.5 29 0.5 1.28 51.5 54 2.5 2.54 110 132 22 2.14 135 143 8 3.55 150 152 2 1.28 165 166 1 1.18 |
Page 54
Quarterly Report to 31 December 2017
==> picture [125 x 37] intentionally omitted <==
| RRLMPDD212 6292165 715912 979 ‐60 263 244 RRLMPDD212 RRLMPDD212 RRLMPDD212 RRLMPDD212 RRLMPDD212 RRLMPDD212 RRLMPDD212 RRLMPDD212 RRLMPDD212 RRLMPDD212 RRLMPDD212 RRLMPDD212 RRLMPDD212 RRLMPDD212 RRLMPDD212 RRLMPDD212 RRLMPDD212 |
23.5 25.5 2 1.07 30 30.5 0.5 1.48 34 35 1 1.21 36 37 1 1.47 136 139 3 1.45 146 148 2 2.44 158 159 1 1.11 159.7 162 2.3 5.71 169 170 1 2.17 173 177 4 2.64 181 184 3 1.54 187 188 1 2.03 192 193 1 1.5 197 198 1 1.09 201 205 4 1.27 210 217 7 1.94 221 224 3 1.47 234 235 1 1.08 |
|---|---|
| RRLMPDD213 6292552 716148 949 ‐60 258 564 RRLMPDD213 RRLMPDD213 RRLMPDD213 RRLMPDD213 RRLMPDD213 RRLMPDD213 RRLMPDD213 |
415 416 1 1.47 428 429 1 2.47 455 464 9 3.58 474 477 3 4.55 480 481 1 1.07 484 488 4 1.84 494 497 3 1.42 502 527 25 2.78 |
| RRLMPDD214 6292480 716208 950 ‐60 258 735 |
149 150 1 13.05 |
Page 55
Quarterly Report to 31 December 2017
==> picture [125 x 37] intentionally omitted <==
| RRLMPDD214 RRLMPDD214 RRLMPDD214 RRLMPDD214 RRLMPDD214 RRLMPDD214 RRLMPDD214 RRLMPDD214 RRLMPDD214 RRLMPDD214 RRLMPDD214 RRLMPDD214 RRLMPDD214 RRLMPDD214 RRLMPDD214 |
377 379 2 1.26 429 430 1 1.28 503 504 1 1.33 507 508 1 1.31 519 532 13 2.59 543 554 11 1.33 557 558 1 1.12 559 560 1 1.11 565 566 1 1.31 582 604 22 1.71 609.37 616 6.63 2.97 634 637 3 1.99 644 646 2 1.38 673 674 1 1.84 686 687 1 1.37 |
|---|---|
| RRLMPDD215 6292453 716164 953 ‐65 258 740 RRLMPDD215 RRLMPDD215 RRLMPDD215 RRLMPDD215 RRLMPDD215 RRLMPDD215 RRLMPDD215 RRLMPDD215 RRLMPDD215 RRLMPDD215 RRLMPDD215 |
357 364 7 1.16 473 475 2 2.53 490 495 5 2.12 498 500 2 7.95 504 507 3 3.19 513 523 10 1.75 528 532 4 2.01 538 544 6 1.66 552 557 5 1.51 565 570 5 1.66 577 584 7 1.73 587 596 9 2.09 |
Page 56
Quarterly Report to 31 December 2017
==> picture [125 x 37] intentionally omitted <==
| RRLMPDD215 RRLMPDD215 RRLMPDD215 RRLMPDD215 RRLMPDD215 |
599 600 1 1.03 606 607 1 1.34 614 615 1 2.34 618 619 1 1.05 631 632 1 1.04 |
|---|---|
| RRLMPDD217 6292354 716136 952 ‐63 258 603 RRLMPDD217 RRLMPDD217 RRLMPDD217 RRLMPDD217 RRLMPDD217 RRLMPDD217 RRLMPDD217 RRLMPDD217 RRLMPDD217 RRLMPDD217 |
259 260 1 1.36 267 272 5 1.44 286 288 2 1.42 321 325 4 1.77 333 339 6 1.64 342 343 1 2.41 347 372 25 1.53 376 378 2 1.62 382 383 1 1.45 387 388 1 1.12 400 404 4 1.53 |
| RRLMPRC160 6292731 715550 915 ‐60 258 97 |
86 88 2 1.39 |
| RRLMPRC161 6292830 715557 913 ‐60 258 78 |
25 26 1 1.54 |
| RRLMPRC162 6292738 715597 917 ‐60 258 168 RRLMPRC162 RRLMPRC162 RRLMPRC162 |
38 39 1 2.67 62 63 1 1.05 72 73 1 2.16 157 158 1 1.51 |
| RRLMPRC163 6292728 715648 919 ‐60 258 200 |
102 103 1 1.58 |
| RRLMPRC164 6292784 715532 914 ‐60 258 200 RRLMPRC164 RRLMPRC164 |
54 55 1 1.04 65 66 1 1.21 67 68 1 1.16 |
Page 57
Quarterly Report to 31 December 2017
==> picture [125 x 37] intentionally omitted <==
| RRLMPRC164 RRLMPRC164 RRLMPRC164 |
77 79 2 1.1 102 103 1 1.29 181 183 2 4.24 |
|---|---|
| RRLMPRC165 6292780 715588 916 ‐60 258 250 RRLMPRC165 RRLMPRC165 RRLMPRC165 RRLMPRC165 RRLMPRC165 |
52 53 1 1.21 77 78 1 1.67 138 139 1 10.1 148 151 3 1.33 166 168 2 1.3 174 175 1 2.46 |
| RRLMPRC166 6292821 715491 910 ‐60 258 150 |
10 11 1 1.31 |
| RRLMPRC167 6292976 715620 919 ‐60 258 100 |
No significant Intercept |
| RRLMPRC168 6292781 716539 970 ‐60 258 200 |
No significant Intercept |
| RRLMPRC169 6292894 716580 967 ‐60 258 100 |
No significant Intercept |
| RRLMPRC170 6292898 716500 971 ‐60 258 100 |
No significant Intercept |
| RRLMPRC171 6292897 716404 963 ‐60 258 100 |
No significant Intercept |
| RRLMPRC173 6291181 716702 959 ‐60 258 100 |
No significant Intercept |
| RRLMPRC174 6291198 716515 935 ‐60 258 100 |
No significant Intercept |
| RRLMPRC175 6291179 716800 968 ‐60 258 97 |
No significant Intercept |
| RRLMPRC176 6293169 716224 934 ‐60 258 100 |
No significant Intercept |
| Petra Collar Location | Intersection >1.0ppm Au and >1g/t Au*m |
| Hole ID Y X Z Dip Azimuth Total Depth (m) |
From (m) To (m) Interval (m) Au (ppm) |
| RRLPTRAC599 6937540 426810 537 ‐60 93 88 RRLPTRAC599 |
54 55 1 1.71 76 77 1 1.81 |
| RRLPTRAC600 6937540 426770 537 ‐60 90 77 |
48 49 1 1.5 |
Page 58
Quarterly Report to 31 December 2017
==> picture [125 x 37] intentionally omitted <==
| RRLPTRAC600 RRLPTRAC600 |
51 52 1 1.06 54 55 1 1.86 |
|---|---|
| RRLPTRAC601 6937540 426730 537 ‐60 91 68 |
50 51 1 2.44 |
| RRLPTRAC602 6937460 426820 537 ‐60 88 80 |
No significant Intercept |
| RRLPTRAC603 6937460 426780 537 ‐60 88 84 |
No significant Intercept |
| RRLPTRAC604 6937460 426740 537 ‐60 89 66 |
No significant Intercept |
| RRLPTRAC606 6937330 427110 537 ‐60 91 95 |
No significant Intercept |
| RRLPTRAC607 6937330 427070 537 ‐60 92 95 |
70 71 1 4.14 |
| RRLPTRAC609 6937330 426990 537 ‐60 90 98 |
71 72 1 1.04 |
| RRLPTRAC610 6937330 426950 537 ‐60 92 106 |
68 69 1 1.1 |
| RRLPTRAC611 6937330 426910 537 ‐60 90 73 |
53 54 1 1.11 |
| RRLPTRAC612 6937330 426870 537 ‐60 91 80 |
51 52 1 1.02 |
| RRLPTRAC613 6937330 426830 537 ‐60 91 65 RRLPTRAC613 |
48 49 1 3.01 52 53 1 2.8 |
| RRLPTRAC614 6937330 426790 537 ‐60 91 65 RRLPTRAC614 |
47 48 1 1.66 54 56 2 2.23 |
| RRLPTRAC615 6937330 426750 537 ‐60 91 59 |
No significant Intercept |
| RRLPTRAC617 6937180 427100 537 ‐60 86 77 |
46 47 1 2.03 |
| RRLPTRAC619 6937180 427020 537 ‐60 91 74 |
No significant Intercept |
| RRLPTRAC623 6937180 426860 537 ‐60 90 112 RRLPTRAC623 |
41 46 5 1.21 71 72 1 1.16 |
| RRLPTRAC624 6937180 426820 537 ‐60 91 81 |
44 46 2 1.28 |
| RRLPTRAC625 6937180 426780 537 ‐60 89 66 |
No significant Intercept |
| RRLPTRAC626 6937020 427100 537 ‐60 90 62 |
53 54 1 1.44 |
| RRLPTRAC628 6937020 427020 537 ‐60 92 80 |
51 52 1 2.3 |
Page 59
Quarterly Report to 31 December 2017
==> picture [125 x 37] intentionally omitted <==
| RRLPTRAC629 6937020 426980 537 ‐60 87 66 |
RRLPTRAC629 6937020 426980 537 ‐60 87 66 |
No significant Intercept |
|---|---|---|
| RRLPTRAC631 6937020 426900 537 ‐60 89 69 |
46 47 1 2.78 |
|
| RRLPTRAC632 6937020 426860 537 ‐60 91 70 |
46 47 1 2.5 |
|
| RRLPTRAC633 6937020 426820 537 ‐60 93 65 |
42 44 2 2.17 |
|
| RRLPTRAC634 6936760 427060 537 ‐60 89 62 |
No significant Intercept | |
| RRLPTRAC635 6936760 427020 537 ‐60 91 72 |
No significant Intercept | |
| RRLPTRAC636 6936760 426980 537 ‐60 88 66 |
6 7 1 3.24 |
|
| RRLPTRAC637 6936760 426940 537 ‐60 90 62 RRLPTRAC637 RRLPTRAC637 RRLPTRAC637 |
4 5 1 1.35 12 13 1 1.51 46 48 2 1.12 49 50 1 1.35 |
|
| RRLPTRAC638 6936760 426900 537 ‐60 87 58 |
42 43 1 1.21 |
|
| RRLPTRAC639 6936760 426860 537 ‐60 91 67 |
No significant Intercept | |
| RRLPTRAC640 6936760 426820 537 ‐60 90 64 |
6 7 1 6.21 |
|
| RRLPTRAC673 | 6937400 426360 537 ‐60 90 63 |
No significant Intercept |
| RRLPTRAC674 | 6937400 426280 537 ‐60 90 63 |
No significant Intercept |
| RRLPTRAC675 | 6937400 426200 537 ‐60 90 68 |
No significant Intercept |
| RRLPTRAC676 | 6937400 426120 537 ‐60 90 86 |
No significant Intercept |
| RRLPTRAC677 | 6937400 426040 537 ‐60 90 94 |
No significant Intercept |
| RRLPTRAC678 | 6937540 427010 537 ‐60 90 86 |
No significant Intercept |
| RRLPTRAC679 | 6937540 426930 537 ‐60 90 74 |
No significant Intercept |
| RRLPTRAC680 | 6937460 426900 537 ‐60 90 113 |
No significant Intercept |
| RRLPTRAC681 | 6937330 426850 537 ‐60 90 75 |
No significant Intercept |
| RRLPTRAC682 | 6937330 426810 537 ‐60 90 66 |
No significant Intercept |
| RRLPTRAC683 | 6937180 426880 537 ‐60 90 89 |
No significant Intercept |
Page 60
Quarterly Report to 31 December 2017
==> picture [125 x 37] intentionally omitted <==
| RRLPTRAC684 | 6937180 426840 537 ‐60 90 64 |
No significant Intercept |
|---|---|---|
| RRLPTRAC685 | 6937020 426880 537 ‐60 90 70 |
No significant Intercept |
| RRLPTRAC686 | 6937020 426800 537 ‐60 90 59 |
No significant Intercept |
| RRLPTRAC687 | 6937120 426651 537 ‐60 90 66 |
No significant Intercept |
| RRLPTRAC688 | 6937120 426633 537 ‐60 90 62 |
42 43 1 3.79 46 48 2 1.33 |
| RRLPTRAC688 | ||
| RRLPTRAC689 | 6937121 426612 537 ‐60 90 59 |
4 5 1 3.53 34 35 1 1.16 36 37 1 1.59 |
| RRLPTRAC689 | ||
| RRLPTRAC689 | ||
| RRLPTRAC690 | 6936940 426940 537 ‐60 90 75 |
No significant Intercept |
| RRLPTRAC691 | 6936940 426900 537 ‐60 90 58 |
No significant Intercept |
| RRLPTRAC692 | 6936940 426860 537 ‐60 90 71 |
No significant Intercept |
| RRLPTRAC693 | 6936820 426970 537 ‐60 90 63 |
No significant Intercept |
| RRLPTRAC694 | 6936820 426930 537 ‐60 90 66 |
No significant Intercept |
| RRLPTRAC695 | 6936820 426890 537 ‐60 90 66 |
No significant Intercept |
| RRLPTRAC696 | 6936760 426780 537 ‐60 90 62 |
No significant Intercept |
| Reichelts Find Collar Location | Intersection >1.0ppm Au and >1g/t Au*m | |
| Hole ID Y X Z Dip Azimuth Total Depth (m) |
From (m) To (m) Interval (m) Au (ppm) |
|
| RRLREIRC104 | 6901648 438275 527 ‐60 270 222 |
184 190 6 2.87 |
| RRLREIRC105 | 6901669 438283 527 ‐62 270 240 |
184 186 2 4.24 218 219 1 1.14 |
| RRLREIRC105 | ||
| RRLREIRC106 | 6901692 438293 527 ‐60 270 240 |
183 185 2 1.45 |
| RRLREIRC107 | 6901711 438296 527 ‐60 270 240 |
163 165 2 1.6 168 169 1 20.6 |
| RRLREIRC107 |
Page 61
Quarterly Report to 31 December 2017
==> picture [125 x 37] intentionally omitted <==
| RRLREIRC107 | 210 213 3 4.32 |
|
|---|---|---|
| RRLREIRC108 | 6901691 438337 527 ‐60 270 282 |
No significant Intercept |
| RRLREIRC109 | 6901888 438238 528 ‐60 271 114 |
82 85 3 4.57 |
| RRLREIRC110 | 6901884 438280 527 ‐60 270 180 |
112 114 2 3.76 128 131 3 6.58 |
| RRLREIRC110 | ||
| RRLREIRC111 | 6901938 438249 528 ‐55 270 90 |
No significant Intercept |
| RRLREIRC112 | 6901937 438257 528 ‐60 270 108 |
67 68 1 2.79 76 77 1 1.54 84 88 4 11.88 91 92 1 1.33 |
| RRLREIRC112 | ||
| RRLREIRC112 | ||
| RRLREIRC112 | ||
| RRLREIRC113 | 6901937 438296 528 ‐60 270 180 |
60 61 1 1.12 85 86 1 4.61 92 93 1 1.16 95 96 1 1.39 114 117 3 1.69 132 133 1 16.6 |
| RRLREIRC113 | ||
| RRLREIRC113 | ||
| RRLREIRC113 | ||
| RRLREIRC113 | ||
| RRLREIRC113 | ||
| RRLREIRC114 | 6901676 438320 526 ‐60 271 282 |
No significant Intercept |
| RRLREIRC115 | 6901711 438322 527 ‐60 270 270 |
210 212 2 1.87 |
| RRLREIRC116 | 6901743 438329 527 ‐60 269 270 |
217 219 2 9.65 257 258 1 1.49 |
| RRLREIRC116 | ||
| RRLREIRC117 | 6901790 438330 527 ‐60 270 264 |
207 209 2 7.21 |
| RRLREIRC118 | 6901822 438293 528 ‐55 269 168 |
141 143 2 7.18 |
| RRLREIRC119 | 6901822 438315 527 ‐60 270 240 |
170 171 1 1.17 174 175 1 6.05 |
| RRLREIRC119 | ||
| RRLREIRC120 | 6901824 438341 526 ‐60 269 248 |
No significant Intercept |
Page 62
Quarterly Report to 31 December 2017
==> picture [125 x 37] intentionally omitted <==
| RRLREIRC121 | 6901882 438299 527 ‐60 268 222 |
132 139 7 4.96 177 179 2 6.16 |
132 139 7 4.96 177 179 2 6.16 |
132 139 7 4.96 177 179 2 6.16 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RRLREIRC121 | ||||
| RRLREIRC122 | 6902008 438315 529 ‐60 270 162 |
No significant Intercept | ||
| RRLREIRC123 | 6901937 438317 527 ‐60 270 204 |
142 143 1 2.35 |
||
| RRLREIRC124 | 6902006 438339 528 ‐60 272 180 |
141 143 2 2.26 165 166 1 2.3 |
||
| RRLREIRC124 | ||||
| RRLREIRC125 | 6901292 438113 514 ‐60 270 42 |
34 35 1 1.07 41 42 1 2.4 |
||
| RRLREIRC125 | ||||
| RRLREIRC126 | 6902112 438032 520 ‐60 270 150 |
No significant Intercept | ||
| RRLREIRC127 | 6902112 438192 520 ‐60 270 90 |
No significant Intercept | ||
| RRLREIRC128 | 6901803 437872 520 ‐60 270 90 |
No significant Intercept | ||
| RRLREIRC129 | 6901803 437872 520 ‐60 270 102 |
No significant Intercept | ||
| RRLREIRC130 | 6901633 437967 520 ‐60 270 96 |
No significant Intercept | ||
| RRLREIRC131 | 6901638 437815 520 ‐60 270 90 |
No significant Intercept | ||
| RRLREIRC132 | 6901175 437830 520 ‐60 270 90 |
No significant Intercept | ||
| RRLREIRC133 | 6900924 437836 520 ‐60 270 90 |
No significant Intercept | ||
| RRLREIRC134 | 6900920 437915 520 ‐60 269 96 |
No significant Intercept | ||
| RRLREIRC135 | 6900915 437994 520 ‐60 269 114 |
No significant Intercept | ||
| RRLREIRC136 | 6902112 437872 520 ‐60 269 90 |
No significant Intercept | ||
| RRLREIRC137 | 6902427 438002 520 ‐60 269 96 |
No significant Intercept | ||
| RRLREIRC138 | 6902432 438082 520 ‐60 269 96 |
No significant Intercept | ||
| RRLREIRC139 | 6902427 438245 520 ‐60 269 90 |
No significant Intercept | ||
| Russells Find Collar Location | Intersection >1.0ppm Au and >1g/t Au*m | |||
| Hole ID Y X Z Dip Azimuth Total Depth (m) |
From (m) |
To (m) |
Interval (m) Au (ppm) |
Page 63
Quarterly Report to 31 December 2017
==> picture [125 x 37] intentionally omitted <==
| RRLRFRC091 | 6905170 438110 530 ‐60 254 96 |
6905170 438110 530 ‐60 254 96 |
6905170 438110 530 ‐60 254 96 |
No significant Intercept |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RRLRFRC092 | 6905190 438190 530 ‐60 257 90 |
No significant Intercept | ||
| RRLRFRC093 | 6905210 438270 530 ‐60 257 84 |
No significant Intercept | ||
| RRLRFRC094 | 6905230 438345 530 ‐60 258 96 |
No significant Intercept | ||
| RRLRFRC095 | 6905250 438420 530 ‐60 255 96 |
No significant Intercept | ||
| RRLRFRC096 | 6905260 438480 530 ‐65 255 114 |
No significant Intercept | ||
| RRLRFRC097 | 6905520 438430 530 ‐60 255 102 |
No significant Intercept | ||
| RRLRFRC098 | 6904960 438080 530 ‐60 258 84 |
No significant Intercept | ||
| RRLRFRC099 | 6904960 438160 530 ‐60 257 102 |
No significant Intercept | ||
| RRLRFRC100 | 6904960 438240 530 ‐60 269 84 |
No significant Intercept | ||
| RRLRFRC101 | 6904960 438320 530 ‐60 272 126 |
No significant Intercept | ||
| RRLRFRC102 | 6904955 438390 530 ‐60 272 90 |
No significant Intercept | ||
| RRLRFRC103 | 6905540 438510 530 ‐60 254 90 |
No significant Intercept | ||
| RRLRFRC104 | 6905307 438776 533 ‐60 256 270 |
165 166 1 1 203 210 7 1.95 246 248 2 9.89 |
||
| RRLRFRC104 | ||||
| RRLRFRC104 | ||||
| RRLRFRC105 | 6905215 438726 535 ‐60 255 234 |
150 151 1 1.65 166 167 1 3.74 171 172 1 3.24 188 191 3 1.48 218 220 2 11.46 229 230 1 2.28 |
||
| RRLRFRC105 | ||||
| RRLRFRC105 | ||||
| RRLRFRC105 | ||||
| RRLRFRC105 | ||||
| RRLRFRC105 | ||||
| RRLRFRC106 | 6905209 438707 535 ‐60 256 204 |
No significant Intercept | ||
| RRLRFRC107 | 6905221 438745 535 ‐60 256 252 |
149 150 1 1.98 159 160 1 2.08 |
||
| RRLRFRC107 |
Page 64
Quarterly Report to 31 December 2017
==> picture [125 x 37] intentionally omitted <==
| RRLRFRC107 | 164 166 2 1.65 180 182 2 2.25 187 188 1 5.43 204 208 4 1.49 |
|
|---|---|---|
| RRLRFRC107 | ||
| RRLRFRC107 | ||
| RRLRFRC107 | ||
| RRLRFRC108 | 6905335 438775 533 ‐60 257 270 |
170 171 1 1.85 173 174 1 1.33 183 185 2 1.61 188 190 2 1.27 193 194 1 1.44 209 211 2 2.28 244 246 2 8.63 |
| RRLRFRC108 | ||
| RRLRFRC108 | ||
| RRLRFRC108 | ||
| RRLRFRC108 | ||
| RRLRFRC108 | ||
| RRLRFRC108 | ||
| RRLRFRC109 | 6905366 438698 529 ‐60 254 192 |
112 116 4 1.01 120 121 1 1.49 174 175 1 17.6 |
| RRLRFRC109 | ||
| RRLRFRC109 | ||
| RRLRFRC110 | 6905372 438720 529 ‐60 254 210 |
190 191 1 10.1 |
| RRLRFRC111 | 6905301 438695 531 ‐60 254 192 |
128 131 3 1.04 147 148 1 1.71 177 178 1 1.25 |
| RRLRFRC111 | ||
| RRLRFRC111 | ||
| RRLRFRC112 | 6905480 438685 527 ‐60 255 165 |
No significant Intercept |
| RRLRFRC113 | 6905531 438605 527 ‐56 307 84 |
66 67 1 9.04 |
| RRLRFRC114 | 6905530 438610 528 ‐67 325 114 |
No significant Intercept |
| RRLRFRC115 | 6905525 438641 529 ‐55 265 114 |
94 95 1 1.67 |
| RRLRFRC116 | 6905527 438674 528 ‐60 255 150 |
No significant Intercept |
| RRLRFRC117 | 6905240 438731 534 ‐60 254 228 |
146 148 2 1.98 161 163 2 1.23 |
| RRLRFRC117 |
Page 65
Quarterly Report to 31 December 2017
==> picture [125 x 37] intentionally omitted <==
| RRLRFRC117 | 165 166 1 1.07 176 182 6 1.66 217 218 1 2.66 |
|||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RRLRFRC117 | ||||
| RRLRFRC117 | ||||
| RRLRFRC118 | 6904886 | 438669 525 ‐60 270 216 |
No significant Intercept | |
| RRLRFRC119 | 6904885 | 438535 531 ‐60 270 120 |
14 15 1 1.61 |
|
| RRLRFRC120 | 6904847 | 438549 526 ‐60 270 102 |
No significant Intercept | |
| RRLRFRC121 | 6904846 | 438671 525 ‐60 270 228 |
146 149 3 1.76 |
|
| RRLRFRC122 | 6904807 | 438568 525 ‐60 270 102 |
34 35 1 1.1 56 57 1 1.06 81 82 1 1.14 |
|
| RRLRFRC122 | ||||
| RRLRFRC122 | ||||
| RRLRFRC123 | 6904807 | 438648 525 ‐60 270 162 |
No significant Intercept | |
| Rosemont Collar Location | Intersection >1.0ppm Au and >1g/t Au*m | |||
| Hole ID | Y | X | Z Dip Azimuth Total Depth (m) |
From (m) To (m) Interval (m) Au (ppm) |
| RRLRMRC692 | 6920021 | 428399 | 396 ‐62 75 199 |
120 121 1 1.13 146 147 1 1.2 149 151 2 1.61 155 165 10 2.5 168 177 9 4.82 |
| RRLRMRC692 | ||||
| RRLRMRC692 | ||||
| RRLRMRC692 | ||||
| RRLRMRC692 | ||||
| RRLRMRC693 | 6920017 | 428406 | 396 ‐66 52 9 |
No significant Intercept |
| RRLRMRC694 | 6920011 | 428397 | 396 ‐65 54 221 |
168 170 2 21.73 178 179 1 1.05 184 185 1 3.67 190 191 1 2.46 198 203 5 3.72 |
| RRLRMRC694 | ||||
| RRLRMRC694 | ||||
| RRLRMRC694 | ||||
| RRLRMRC694 |
Page 66
Quarterly Report to 31 December 2017
==> picture [125 x 37] intentionally omitted <==
| RRLRMRC695 | 6919982 428411 396 ‐62 74 187 |
6919982 428411 396 ‐62 74 187 |
6919982 428411 396 ‐62 74 187 |
132 134 2 6.91 137 149 12 5.78 152 159 7 2.27 162 163 1 1.01 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RRLRMRC695 | ||||
| RRLRMRC695 | ||||
| RRLRMRC695 | ||||
| RRLRMRC696 | 6919983 428414 396 ‐58 74 172 |
128 129 1 7.99 133 148 15 1.9 151 158 7 1.19 |
||
| RRLRMRC696 | ||||
| RRLRMRC696 | ||||
| RRLRMRC697 | 6920022 428403 396 ‐58 75 173 |
128 129 1 2.52 137 142 5 9.58 145 151 6 2.02 155 156 1 1.1 162 163 1 1.44 |
||
| RRLRMRC697 | ||||
| RRLRMRC697 | ||||
| RRLRMRC697 | ||||
| RRLRMRC697 | ||||
| RRLRMRC701 | 6919942 428424 396 ‐58 74 174 |
117 121 4 14.11 128 138 10 1.99 143 144 1 3.1 148 150 2 3.45 155 156 1 1.58 |
||
| RRLRMRC701 | ||||
| RRLRMRC701 | ||||
| RRLRMRC701 | ||||
| RRLRMRC701 | ||||
| RRLRMRC702 | 6919942 428422 396 ‐64 76 204 |
131 132 1 2.67 140 143 3 1.43 147 167 20 3.12 176 177 1 2.49 183 185 2 1.27 197 198 1 1.02 |
||
| RRLRMRC702 | ||||
| RRLRMRC702 | ||||
| RRLRMRC702 | ||||
| RRLRMRC702 | ||||
| RRLRMRC702 | ||||
| RRLRMRC703 | 6919941 428420 396 ‐68 75 222 |
140 143 3 27.94 157 158 1 2.58 161 165 4 4.69 |
||
| RRLRMRC703 | ||||
| RRLRMRC703 |
Page 67
Quarterly Report to 31 December 2017
==> picture [125 x 37] intentionally omitted <==
| RRLRMRC703 | 169 170 1 1.54 181 182 1 1.26 189 195 6 1.53 198 201 3 2.73 |
|
|---|---|---|
| RRLRMRC703 | ||
| RRLRMRC703 | ||
| RRLRMRC703 | ||
| RRLRMRC704 | 6919927 428447 395 ‐62 74 162 |
99 108 9 9.73 118 127 9 1.9 131 143 12 3.44 |
| RRLRMRC704 | ||
| RRLRMRC704 | ||
| RRLRMRC705 | 6919926 428443 395 ‐66 74 180 |
109 111 2 19.62 122 130 8 3.05 136 137 1 1.12 141 144 3 4.07 158 161 3 3.01 |
| RRLRMRC705 | ||
| RRLRMRC705 | ||
| RRLRMRC705 | ||
| RRLRMRC705 | ||
| RRLRMRC706 | 6919925 428440 396 ‐69 74 204 |
115 117 2 3.32 122 126 4 2.84 150 160 10 2.92 169 171 2 1.34 174 175 1 2.42 178 181 3 1.14 |
| RRLRMRC706 | ||
| RRLRMRC706 | ||
| RRLRMRC706 | ||
| RRLRMRC706 | ||
| RRLRMRC706 | ||
| RRLRMRC707 | 6919913 428461 395 ‐65 73 168 |
84 89 5 6.29 107 115 8 4.91 131 137 6 3.1 |
| RRLRMRC707 | ||
| RRLRMRC707 | ||
| RRLRMRC708 | 6919909 428448 395 ‐65 73 186 |
104 106 2 17.9 122 123 1 1.16 137 140 3 1.58 160 163 3 1.71 |
| RRLRMRC708 | ||
| RRLRMRC708 | ||
| RRLRMRC708 | ||
| RRLRMRCD007 | 6918859 428815 502 ‐50 74 261 |
190.24 191.29 1.05 1.49 |
Page 68
Quarterly Report to 31 December 2017
==> picture [125 x 37] intentionally omitted <==
| RRLRMRCD007 | 199 228 29 2.57 230.58 230.83 0.25 2.51 |
|
|---|---|---|
| RRLRMRCD007 | ||
| RRLRMRCD008 | 6918857 428813 502 ‐55 74 279 |
222 222.3 0.3 1.72 225 226.04 1.04 2.12 229.58 231.81 2.23 2.15 237.92 239.49 1.57 6.18 243 252.47 9.47 2.17 |
| RRLRMRCD008 | ||
| RRLRMRCD008 | ||
| RRLRMRCD008 | ||
| RRLRMRCD008 | ||
| RRLRMRCD009 | 6918858 428811 502 ‐60 75 292 |
230 234.85 4.85 3.38 242.15 245.86 3.71 1.75 256.3 264.91 8.61 7.01 269 277 8 1.52 |
| RRLRMRCD009 | ||
| RRLRMRCD009 | ||
| RRLRMRCD009 | ||
| RRLRMRCD010 | 6918907 428801 502 ‐50 74 240 |
204 208.29 4.29 3.97 211.26 214.41 3.15 2.37 |
| RRLRMRCD010 | ||
| RRLRMRCD011 | 6918907 428801 502 ‐57 74 270 |
233.85 234.45 0.6 1.22 241.12 241.73 0.61 4.3 |
| RRLRMRCD011 | ||
| RRLRMRCD012 | 6918907 428800 502 ‐63 74 306 |
250.35 266.7 16.35 6.25 271.37 272 0.63 3.44 303 304 1 1.65 |
| RRLRMRCD012 | ||
| RRLRMRCD012 | ||
| RRLRMRCD013 | 6919994 428153 507 ‐48 74 546 |
No significant Intercept |
| RRLRMRCD014 | 6919994 428151 507 ‐52 74 339 |
No significant Intercept |
| RRLRMRCD015 | 6919996 428149 507 ‐56 74 340 |
No significant Intercept |
| RRLRMRCD016 | 6919995 428146 507 ‐68 74 273 |
No significant Intercept |
| RRLRMRCD017 | 6919997 428141 506 ‐68 75 510 |
No significant Intercept |
| RRLRMWE064 | 6920340 428910 510 ‐90 0 78 |
No significant Intercept |
| RRLRMWE065 | 6920290 428910 510 ‐90 0 78 |
No significant Intercept |
Page 69
Quarterly Report to 31 December 2017
==> picture [125 x 37] intentionally omitted <==
| RRLRMWE066 | 6920240 428910 510 ‐90 0 78 |
No significant Intercept |
|---|---|---|
| Steer Creek Collar Location | Intersection >1.0ppm Au and >1g/t Au*m | |
| Hole ID Y X Z Dip Azimuth Total Depth (m) |
From (m) To (m) Interval (m) Au (ppm) |
|
| RRLSCAC001 | 6906120 424900 512 ‐60 271 145 |
No significant Intercept |
| RRLSCAC002 | 6906120 425060 512 ‐60 268 71 |
No significant Intercept |
| RRLSCAC003 | 6906120 425220 511 ‐60 265 149 |
No significant Intercept |
| RRLSCAC004 | 6909120 425380 510 ‐60 270 149 |
No significant Intercept |
| RRLSCAC005 | 6905800 424900 511 ‐60 269 65 |
No significant Intercept |
| RRLSCAC006 | 6905800 425060 511 ‐60 270 70 |
No significant Intercept |
| RRLSCAC007 | 6905800 425220 510 ‐60 269 142 |
No significant Intercept |
| RRLSCAC008 | 6905800 425380 510 ‐60 270 134 |
No significant Intercept |
| RRLSCAC009 | 6905480 424900 510 ‐60 266 10 |
No significant Intercept |
| RRLSCAC010 | 6905480 424980 510 ‐60 270 53 |
No significant Intercept |
| RRLSCAC011 | 6905480 425060 510 ‐60 266 131 |
No significant Intercept |
| RRLSCAC012 | 6905480 425140 510 ‐60 268 149 |
No significant Intercept |
| RRLSCAC013 | 6905480 425220 510 ‐60 267 142 |
No significant Intercept |
| RRLSCAC014 | 6905480 425380 510 ‐60 271 149 |
No significant Intercept |
| RRLSCAC015 | 6905480 435300 510 ‐60 271 149 |
No significant Intercept |
| RRLSCAC016 | 6905480 435460 510 ‐60 267 86 |
No significant Intercept |
| RRLSCAC017 | 6905480 435540 510 ‐60 270 113 |
No significant Intercept |
| RRLSCAC018 | 6905480 425620 510 ‐60 265 119 |
No significant Intercept |
| RRLSCAC019 | 6905160 424980 510 ‐60 268 15 |
No significant Intercept |
| RRLSCAC020 | 6905160 425060 510 ‐60 265 18 |
No significant Intercept |
Page 70
Quarterly Report to 31 December 2017
==> picture [125 x 37] intentionally omitted <==
| RRLSCAC021 | 6905160 425140 510 ‐60 270 126 |
No significant Intercept |
|---|---|---|
| RRLSCAC022 | 6905160 425220 510 ‐60 268 144 |
No significant Intercept |
| RRLSCAC023 | 6905160 425300 510 ‐60 268 149 |
No significant Intercept |
| RRLSCAC024 | 6905160 425380 510 ‐60 269 149 |
No significant Intercept |
| RRLSCAC025 | 6905160 425460 510 ‐60 264 179 |
No significant Intercept |
| RRLSCAC026 | 6905160 425540 510 ‐60 264 179 |
No significant Intercept |
| RRLSCAC027 | 6905160 425620 510 ‐60 270 70 |
No significant Intercept |
| RRLSCAC028 | 6904480 424500 510 ‐60 266 134 |
No significant Intercept |
| RRLSCAC029 | 6905160 425580 510 ‐60 269 52 |
No significant Intercept |
| RRLSCAC030 | 6905160 425660 510 ‐60 268 20 |
No significant Intercept |
| RRLSCAC031 | 6905160 425740 510 ‐60 267 27 |
No significant Intercept |
| RRLSCAC032 | 6905160 425820 510 ‐60 268 38 |
No significant Intercept |
| RRLSCAC033 | 6905160 425900 510 ‐60 266 4 |
No significant Intercept |
| RRLSCAC034 | 6903960 425460 510 ‐60 267 33 |
No significant Intercept |
| RRLSCAC035 | 6903960 425620 510 ‐60 270 136 |
No significant Intercept |
| RRLSCAC036 | 6903960 425780 510 ‐60 267 179 |
No significant Intercept |
| RRLSCAC037 | 6903960 425940 510 ‐60 267 179 |
No significant Intercept |
| RRLSCAC038 | 6903960 426100 510 ‐60 273 147 |
No significant Intercept |
| RRLSCAC039 | 6903960 426260 510 ‐60 264 179 |
No significant Intercept |
| RRLSCAC040 | 6902920 424980 510 ‐60 273 137 |
No significant Intercept |
| RRLSCAC041 | 6902920 425300 510 ‐60 270 37 |
No significant Intercept |
| RRLSCAC042 | 6902920 425460 510 ‐60 270 14 |
No significant Intercept |
| RRLSCAC043 | 6902920 425620 510 ‐60 270 7 |
No significant Intercept |
| RRLSCAC044 | 6902920 425940 510 ‐60 265 105 |
No significant Intercept |
Page 71
Quarterly Report to 31 December 2017
==> picture [125 x 37] intentionally omitted <==
| RRLSCAC045 | 6902920 425780 510 ‐60 268 80 |
No significant Intercept |
|---|---|---|
| RRLSCAC046 | 6902920 426260 510 ‐60 271 90 |
No significant Intercept |
| RRLSCAC047 | 6902920 426420 510 ‐60 265 96 |
No significant Intercept |
| RRLSCAC048 | 6902920 424820 510 ‐60 268 35 |
No significant Intercept |
| RRLSCAC049 | 6902920 425140 510 ‐60 268 23 |
No significant Intercept |
| RRLSCAC050 | 6902600 424660 510 ‐60 266 57 |
No significant Intercept |
| RRLSCAC051 | 6902600 424980 510 ‐60 268 60 |
No significant Intercept |
| RRLSCAC052 | 6902600 425300 510 ‐60 270 9 |
No significant Intercept |
| RRLSCAC053 | 6902600 425140 510 ‐60 268 81 |
No significant Intercept |
| RRLSCAC054 | 6902600 425620 510 ‐60 271 34 |
No significant Intercept |
| RRLSCAC055 | 6902600 425940 510 ‐60 267 107 |
No significant Intercept |
| RRLSCAC056 | 6902600 426260 510 ‐60 272 80 |
No significant Intercept |
| RRLSCAC057 | 6902920 425580 510 ‐60 268 171 |
No significant Intercept |
| Speights Collar Location | Intersection >1.0ppm Au and >1g/t Au*m | |
| Hole ID Y X Z Dip Azimuth Total Depth (m) |
From (m) To (m) Interval (m) Au (ppm) |
|
| RRLSPAC049 | 6919600 431790 500 ‐60 271 66 |
No significant Intercept |
| RRLSPAC050 | 6919600 431870 500 ‐60 270 51 |
No significant Intercept |
| RRLSPAC051 | 6919600 431950 500 ‐60 268 60 |
No significant Intercept |
| RRLSPAC052 | 6919600 432020 500 ‐60 267 62 |
No significant Intercept |
| RRLSPAC053 | 6919600 432100 500 ‐60 268 64 |
52 56 4 1.17 |
| RRLSPAC054 | 6919600 432180 500 ‐60 268 59 |
No significant Intercept |
| RRLSPAC055 | 6919600 432260 500 ‐60 270 58 |
No significant Intercept |
| RRLSPAC056 | 6919600 432340 500 ‐60 268 64 |
No significant Intercept |
Page 72
Quarterly Report to 31 December 2017
==> picture [125 x 37] intentionally omitted <==
| RRLSPAC057 | 6919600 432420 500 ‐60 267 63 |
No significant Intercept |
|---|---|---|
| RRLSPAC058 | 6919600 432500 500 ‐60 270 51 |
No significant Intercept |
| RRLSPAC059 | 6919600 432060 500 ‐60 274 70 |
No significant Intercept |
| RRLSPAC060 | 6920200 431960 500 ‐60 268 50 |
No significant Intercept |
| RRLSPAC061 | 6920200 432040 500 ‐60 270 49 |
No significant Intercept |
| RRLSPAC062 | 6920200 432120 500 ‐60 267 50 |
No significant Intercept |
| RRLSPAC063 | 6920200 432200 500 ‐60 267 50 |
No significant Intercept |
| RRLSPAC064 | 6920200 432280 500 ‐60 266 60 |
No significant Intercept |
| RRLSPAC065 | 6920200 432360 500 ‐60 272 45 |
No significant Intercept |
| RRLSPAC066 | 6920200 432440 500 ‐60 269 33 |
No significant Intercept |
| RRLSPAC067 | 6920200 432520 500 ‐60 266 27 |
No significant Intercept |
| RRLSPAC068 | 6920600 431720 500 ‐60 270 45 |
No significant Intercept |
| RRLSPAC069 | 6920600 431800 500 ‐60 270 41 |
No significant Intercept |
| RRLSPAC070 | 6920600 431760 500 ‐60 271 81 |
No significant Intercept |
| RRLSPAC071 | 6920600 431880 500 ‐60 267 47 |
No significant Intercept |
| RRLSPAC072 | 6920600 431960 500 ‐60 270 49 |
No significant Intercept |
| RRLSPAC073 | 6920600 432040 500 ‐60 270 47 |
No significant Intercept |
| RRLSPAC074 | 6920600 432120 500 ‐60 269 54 |
No significant Intercept |
| RRLSPAC075 | 6920600 432200 500 ‐60 270 29 |
No significant Intercept |
| RRLSPAC076 | 6920600 432280 500 ‐60 269 27 |
No significant Intercept |
| RRLSPAC077 | 6920600 432360 500 ‐60 270 31 |
No significant Intercept |
| RRLSPAC078 | 6920600 432440 500 ‐60 268 46 |
No significant Intercept |
| RRLSPAC079 | 6920600 432520 500 ‐60 270 39 |
No significant Intercept |
| Salt Soak Collar Location | Intersection >1.0ppm Au and >1g/t Au*m |
Page 73
Quarterly Report to 31 December 2017
==> picture [125 x 37] intentionally omitted <==
| Hole ID Y X Z Dip Azimuth Total Depth (m) |
Hole ID Y X Z Dip Azimuth Total Depth (m) |
From (m) To (m) Interval (m) Au (ppm) |
|---|---|---|
| RRLSSAC502 | 6934400 418900 515 ‐60 91 122 |
No significant Intercept |
| RRLSSAC503 | 6934400 418820 515 ‐60 91 95 |
No significant Intercept |
| RRLSSAC504 | 6934400 418740 515 ‐60 90 61 |
No significant Intercept |
| RRLSSAC505 | 6934400 418660 515 ‐60 90 30 |
No significant Intercept |
| RRLSSAC506 | 6934400 418580 515 ‐60 90 60 |
No significant Intercept |
| RRLSSAC507 | 6934800 418480 515 ‐60 89 80 |
No significant Intercept |
| RRLSSAC508 | 6934800 418400 515 ‐60 90 101 |
No significant Intercept |
| RRLSSAC509 | 6934800 418320 515 ‐60 90 48 |
No significant Intercept |
| RRLSSAC510 | 6934800 418240 515 ‐60 91 54 |
No significant Intercept |
| RRLSSAC511 | 6934950 418140 515 ‐60 89 83 |
No significant Intercept |
| RRLSSAC512 | 6935200 418240 515 ‐60 91 74 |
No significant Intercept |
| RRLSSAC513 | 6935200 418160 515 ‐60 92 93 |
No significant Intercept |
| RRLSSAC514 | 6935200 418080 515 ‐60 92 101 |
No significant Intercept |
| RRLSSAC515 | 6935200 418000 515 ‐60 89 91 |
No significant Intercept |
| RRLSSAC516 | 6935200 417920 515 ‐60 91 97 |
No significant Intercept |
| RRLSSAC517 | 6935600 417960 515 ‐60 89 98 |
No significant Intercept |
| RRLSSAC518 | 6935600 417880 515 ‐60 90 98 |
No significant Intercept |
| RRLSSAC519 | 6935600 417800 515 ‐60 89 72 |
57 59 2 2.38 |
| RRLSSAC520 | 6935600 417720 515 ‐60 88 59 |
No significant Intercept |
| RRLSSAC521 | 6935600 417640 515 ‐60 88 53 |
No significant Intercept |
| RRLSSAC522 | 6935840 417780 515 ‐60 90 88 |
No significant Intercept |
| RRLSSAC523 | 6936160 417500 515 ‐60 92 93 |
No significant Intercept |
Page 74
Quarterly Report to 31 December 2017
==> picture [125 x 37] intentionally omitted <==
| RRLSSAC524 | 6936300 417520 515 ‐60 90 97 |
No significant Intercept |
|---|---|---|
| RRLSSAC525 | 6936300 417440 515 ‐60 90 109 |
No significant Intercept |
| RRLSSAC526 | 6936300 417360 515 ‐60 90 43 |
No significant Intercept |
| RRLSSAC527 | 6936300 417280 515 ‐60 93 56 |
No significant Intercept |
| RRLSSAC528 | 6936300 417200 515 ‐60 88 63 |
No significant Intercept |
| RRLSSAC529 | 6936620 417370 515 ‐60 85 110 |
No significant Intercept |
| RRLSSAC530 | 6936620 417290 515 ‐60 90 110 |
No significant Intercept |
| RRLSSAC531 | 6936620 417210 515 ‐60 91 98 |
No significant Intercept |
| RRLSSAC532 | 6936620 417130 515 ‐60 93 50 |
No significant Intercept |
| RRLSSAC533 | 6936620 417050 515 ‐60 90 89 |
No significant Intercept |
| RRLSSAC534 | 6936620 416970 515 ‐60 93 89 |
No significant Intercept |
| RRLSSAC535 | 6936400 417300 515 ‐60 90 40 |
No significant Intercept |
| RRLSSAC536 | 6937000 417115 515 ‐60 90 110 |
No significant Intercept |
| RRLSSAC537 | 6937000 417040 515 ‐60 90 47 |
No significant Intercept |
| RRLSSAC538 | 6937000 416960 515 ‐60 91 27 |
No significant Intercept |
| RRLSSAC539 | 6937400 416670 515 ‐60 94 86 |
No significant Intercept |
| RRLSSAC540 | 6937400 416600 515 ‐60 92 52 |
No significant Intercept |
| RRLSSAC541 | 6937400 416520 515 ‐60 90 69 |
No significant Intercept |
| RRLSSAC542 | 6937800 416220 515 ‐60 89 42 |
No significant Intercept |
| RRLSSAC543 | 6937800 416180 515 ‐60 90 61 |
No significant Intercept |
| RRLSSAC544 | 6937800 416140 515 ‐60 85 14 |
No significant Intercept |
| RRLSSRC001 | 6935840 417700 515 ‐60 90 198 |
54 55 1 5.25 |
| RRLSSRC002 | 6936000 417535 515 ‐60 89 204 |
150 152 2 28.6 |
| RRLSSRC003 | 6936160 417420 515 ‐60 88 198 |
No significant Intercept |
Page 75
Quarterly Report to 31 December 2017
==> picture [125 x 37] intentionally omitted <==
| Tooheys Well Collar Location | Tooheys Well Collar Location | Intersection >1.0ppm Au and >1g/t Au*m |
|---|---|---|
| Hole ID Y X Z Dip Azimuth Total Depth (m) |
From (m) To (m) Interval (m) Au (ppm) |
|
| RRLTWAC023 | 6911460 439650 505 ‐60 256 58 |
No significant Intercept |
| RRLTWAC024 | 6911490 439810 505 ‐60 254 37 |
No significant Intercept |
| RRLTWAC025 | 6911520 439910 505 ‐60 255 68 |
No significant Intercept |
| RRLTWAC026 | 6911090 439620 505 ‐60 254 110 |
No significant Intercept |
| RRLTWAC027 | 6911130 439810 505 ‐60 255 51 |
No significant Intercept |
| RRLTWAC028 | 6910930 440230 505 ‐60 254 51 |
No significant Intercept |
| RRLTWAC029 | 6911210 440080 505 ‐50 256 51 |
No significant Intercept |
| RRLTWAC030 | 6911240 440240 505 ‐60 258 113 |
No significant Intercept |
| RRLTWAC031 | 6910780 439610 505 ‐60 256 67 |
No significant Intercept |
| RRLTWAC032 | 6910820 439750 505 ‐60 255 43 |
No significant Intercept |
| RRLTWAC033 | 6910860 439920 505 ‐60 255 26 |
No significant Intercept |
| RRLTWAC034 | 6910900 440070 505 ‐60 257 41 |
No significant Intercept |
| RRLTWAC035 | 6910930 440230 505 ‐60 256 91 |
No significant Intercept |
| RRLTWAC036 | 6910525 439600 505 ‐60 258 58 |
No significant Intercept |
| RRLTWAC037 | 6910510 439770 500 ‐60 254 30 |
No significant Intercept |
| RRLTWAC038 | 6910550 439920 505 ‐60 255 46 |
No significant Intercept |
| RRLTWAC039 | 6910580 440080 505 ‐60 255 42 |
No significant Intercept |
| RRLTWAC040 | 6910620 440230 505 ‐60 255 62 |
No significant Intercept |
| RRLTWAC041 | 6910150 439610 505 ‐60 256 29 |
No significant Intercept |
| RRLTWAC042 | 6910190 439770 505 ‐60 255 44 |
No significant Intercept |
| RRLTWAC043 | 6910230 439920 505 ‐60 255 55 |
No significant Intercept |
Page 76
Quarterly Report to 31 December 2017
==> picture [125 x 37] intentionally omitted <==
| RRLTWAC044 | 6910260 440080 505 ‐60 255 50 |
No significant Intercept |
|---|---|---|
| RRLTWAC045 | 6910300 440230 505 ‐60 255 69 |
No significant Intercept |
| RRLTWAC046 | 6909760 439610 505 ‐60 256 45 |
No significant Intercept |
| RRLTWAC047 | 6909800 439770 505 ‐60 255 27 |
No significant Intercept |
| RRLTWRC549 | 6911710 439440 505 ‐60 265 90 |
No significant Intercept |
| RRLTWRC550 | 6911750 439590 505 ‐60 256 66 |
No significant Intercept |
| RRLTWRC551 | 6911790 439750 505 ‐60 264 60 |
No significant Intercept |
| RRLTWRC552 | 6911420 439500 505 ‐60 260 102 |
No significant Intercept |
| RRLTWRC553 | 6911010 439310 505 ‐60 255 108 |
No significant Intercept |
| RRLTWRC554 | 6911050 439460 505 ‐60 255 90 |
No significant Intercept |
| RRLTWRC555 | 6910700 439300 505 ‐60 263 108 |
No significant Intercept |
| RRLTWRC556 | 6910740 439450 505 ‐60 261 102 |
No significant Intercept |
| RRLTWRC557 | 6910070 439300 505 ‐60 257 108 |
47 48 1 1.02 |
| RRLTWRC558 | 6910110 439460 505 ‐60 259 66 |
No significant Intercept |
| RRLTWRC559 | 6909680 439300 505 ‐60 256 108 |
No significant Intercept |
| RRLTWRC560 | 6910390 439300 505 ‐60 256 60 |
No significant Intercept |
| RRLTWRC561 | 6910495 439465 505 ‐60 254 96 |
No significant Intercept |
| RRLTWRC562 | 6910086 439379 507 ‐60 253 96 |
No significant Intercept |
| Ventnor Collar Location | Intersection >1.0ppm Au and >1g/t Au*m | |
| Hole ID Y X Z Dip Azimuth Total Depth (m) |
From (m) To (m) Interval (m) Au (ppm) |
|
| RRLVNAC001 | 6935200 434570 560 ‐60 256 26 |
No significant Intercept |
| RRLVNAC002 | 6935210 434610 560 ‐60 256 37 |
No significant Intercept |
| RRLVNAC003 | 6935220 434640 560 ‐60 256 45 |
No significant Intercept |
Page 77
Quarterly Report to 31 December 2017
==> picture [125 x 37] intentionally omitted <==
| RRLVNAC004 | 6935230 434680 560 ‐60 256 47 |
No significant Intercept |
|---|---|---|
| RRLVNAC005 | 6935280 434580 560 ‐60 256 49 |
No significant Intercept |
| RRLVNAC006 | 6935298 434628 560 ‐60 256 24 |
No significant Intercept |
| RRLVNAC007 | 6935300 434660 560 ‐60 256 30 |
No significant Intercept |
| RRLVNAC008 | 6935460 434450 560 ‐60 256 69 |
No significant Intercept |
| RRLVNAC009 | 6935470 434490 560 ‐60 256 89 |
77 80 3 1.15 |
| RRLVNAC010 | 6935480 434540 560 ‐60 256 55 |
No significant Intercept |
| RRLVNAC011 | 6935520 434390 560 ‐60 256 62 |
No significant Intercept |
| RRLVNAC012 | 6935530 434440 560 ‐60 256 72 |
48 49 1 1.1 |
| RRLVNAC013 | 6935540 434480 560 ‐60 256 85 |
45 46 1 3.31 76 77 1 5.62 80 81 1 1.33 |
| RRLVNAC013 | ||
| RRLVNAC013 | ||
| RRLVNAC014 | 6935620 434390 560 ‐60 256 91 |
No significant Intercept |
| RRLVNAC015 | 6935640 434450 560 ‐60 256 89 |
No significant Intercept |
| RRLVNAC016 | 6936220 434450 560 ‐60 256 60 |
No significant Intercept |
| RRLVNAC017 | 6936230 434490 560 ‐60 256 54 |
No significant Intercept |
| RRLVNAC018 | 6936390 434510 560 ‐60 256 55 |
No significant Intercept |
| RRLVNAC019 | 6936400 434580 560 ‐60 256 74 |
No significant Intercept |
| RRLVNAC020 | 6936470 434615 560 ‐60 256 98 |
No significant Intercept |
| RRLVNAC021 | 6936620 434610 560 ‐60 256 97 |
No significant Intercept |
| RRLVNAC022 | 6936710 434570 560 ‐60 256 82 |
No significant Intercept |
| RRLVNAC023 | 6936720 434610 560 ‐60 256 84 |
No significant Intercept |
| RRLVNAC024 | 6936800 434590 560 ‐60 256 71 |
No significant Intercept |
| RRLVNAC025 | 6936810 434630 560 ‐60 256 95 |
80 88 8 1.51 |
Page 78
Quarterly Report to 31 December 2017
==> picture [125 x 37] intentionally omitted <==
| RRLVNAC026 | 6936240 434530 560 ‐60 256 58 |
32 36 4 1 |
|---|---|---|
| RRLVNAC027 | 6936300 434490 560 ‐60 256 54 |
16 20 4 1.51 36 40 4 1.76 |
| RRLVNAC027 | ||
| RRLVNAC028 | 6936310 434530 560 ‐60 256 54 |
32 36 4 1.49 |
| RRLVNAC029 | 6936630 434680 560 ‐60 256 110 |
104 110 6 2.07 |
| RRLVNAC030 | 6936730 434640 560 ‐60 256 99 |
92 96 4 2.23 |
| RRLVNAC031 | 6938070 434770 560 ‐60 256 94 |
No significant Intercept |
| RRLVNAC032 | 6938080 434810 560 ‐60 256 108 |
32 36 4 1.01 |
| RRLVNAC033 | 6938090 434850 560 ‐60 256 104 |
64 68 4 3.17 |
| RRLVNAC034 | 6938100 434890 560 ‐60 256 116 |
No significant Intercept |
| RRLVNAC035 | 6938200 434710 570 ‐60 256 62 |
No significant Intercept |
| RRLVNAC036 | 6938220 434750 570 ‐60 256 71 |
No significant Intercept |
| RRLVNAC037 | 6938220 434790 570 ‐60 256 92 |
No significant Intercept |
| RRLVNAC038 | 6938240 434850 580 ‐60 256 72 |
No significant Intercept |
| RRLVNAC039 | 6938590 434550 560 ‐60 256 107 |
No significant Intercept |
| RRLVNAC040 | 6938600 434590 560 ‐60 256 56 |
No significant Intercept |
| RRLVNAC041 | 6938610 434630 560 ‐60 256 68 |
No significant Intercept |
| RRLVNAC042 | 6939630 433710 560 ‐60 270 52 |
No significant Intercept |
| RRLVNAC043 | 6939630 433790 560 ‐60 270 63 |
No significant Intercept |
| RRLVNAC044 | 6939630 433870 560 ‐60 270 50 |
No significant Intercept |
| RRLVNAC045 | 6940220 433590 560 ‐60 270 51 |
No significant Intercept |
| RRLVNAC046 | 6940220 433670 560 ‐60 270 50 |
No significant Intercept |
| RRLVNAC047 | 6940220 433750 560 ‐60 270 58 |
No significant Intercept |
| RRLVNAC048 | 6940220 433830 560 ‐60 270 55 |
No significant Intercept |
Page 79
Quarterly Report to 31 December 2017
==> picture [125 x 37] intentionally omitted <==
| RRLVNAC049 | 6940220 433910 560 ‐60 270 58 |
No significant Intercept |
|---|---|---|
| RRLVNAC050 | 6940200 434940 560 ‐60 270 139 |
No significant Intercept |
| RRLVNAC051 | 6940200 434860 560 ‐60 270 116 |
No significant Intercept |
| RRLVNAC052 | 6940090 434760 560 ‐60 270 87 |
No significant Intercept |
| RRLVNAC053 | 6940090 434800 560 ‐60 270 92 |
No significant Intercept |
| RRLVNAC054 | 6940090 434840 560 ‐60 270 88 |
No significant Intercept |
| RRLVNAC055 | 6940090 434880 560 ‐60 270 95 |
No significant Intercept |
| RRLVNAC056 | 6940090 434920 560 ‐60 270 80 |
No significant Intercept |
| RRLVNAC057 | 6940090 434960 560 ‐60 270 128 |
No significant Intercept |
| RRLVNAC058 | 6936450 434660 560 ‐60 256 94 |
No significant Intercept |
| RRLVNAC059 | 6936420 434660 560 ‐60 256 98 |
No significant Intercept |
| RRLVNAC060 | 6936430 434700 560 ‐60 256 114 |
No significant Intercept |
| RRLVNAC061 | 6936350 434640 560 ‐60 260 95 |
No significant Intercept |
| RRLVNAC062 | 6936250 434570 560 ‐60 256 71 |
No significant Intercept |
| RRLVNAC063 | 6936260 434610 560 ‐60 256 77 |
No significant Intercept |
| RRLVNAC064 | 6936268 434645 560 ‐60 256 92 |
No significant Intercept |
| RRLVNAC065 | 6936277 434684 560 ‐60 256 103 |
No significant Intercept |
| RRLVNAC066 | 6936290 434720 560 ‐60 256 58 |
No significant Intercept |
Page 80