REGIS RESOURCES LIMITED — Interim / Quarterly Report 2017

Jul 20, 2017

Quarterly Report to 30 June 2017

==> picture [125 x 37] intentionally omitted <==

HIGHLIGHTS

DUKETON OPERATIONS

• Record quarterly gold production of 90,428 ounces (Mar 17: 79,223 ounces) at Duketon as higher grade satellite mill feed continues to have a positive impact on production.

• Pre-royalty cash cost for the quarter of $723 per ounce and all in sustaining cost (AISC) of $870 per ounce (Mar 17: CC $798/oz & AISC $1,024/oz) are both well below the lower end of FY2017 annual cost guidance.

• Record annual gold production of 324,353 ounces at a pre-royalty cash cost of $790 per ounce and an AISC of $945 per ounce, both of which are well below the lower end of FY17 guidance.

• Strong cash flow generation from operations continues with $74.2 million for the quarter (Mar 17: $57.8m).

FY2018 GUIDANCE

• Regis expects to build on strong FY2017 operations in FY2018 with gold production guidance increasing to 335,000 – 365,000 ounces at an AISC range of $940 – 1,010 per ounce. Total growth capital expenditure expected to be in the order of $23 million, largely related to the development of new operations Tooheys Well and Baneygo.

CORPORATE

• Cash and bullion increased to $151.7 million at the end of the quarter (Mar 17: $114.6 million)

• Regis sold 88,551 ounces of gold at an average price of A$1,678 per oz during the quarter.

RESOURCES AND RESERVES

• Maiden Ore Reserve estimate announced at Tooheys Well of 7.1 million tonnes at 1.61g/t Au for 366,000 ounces of gold.

• Group Ore Reserves (as at 31 March 2017) increased by 3% from 2.13 million ounces to 2.18 million ounces after accounting for mining depletion of 331,000 ounces.

EXPLORATION

• Exploration focussed on the underground drill programme at Rosemont in WA and the McPhillamys infill drill programme in NSW. Both programmes returned significant intercepts of gold mineralisation.

• RC drilling at Rosemont Underground programme continues to deliver gold intercepts with excellent widths and grades. Significant results from infill and extensional drilling during the quarter include:

10	metres @	43.84	g/t gold from	200	to	210m	2 metres @ 93.00 g/t gold from 195 to 197m
7	metres @	33.86	g/t gold from	284	to	291m	6 metres @ 28.70 g/t gold from 174 to 180m
4	metres@	53.37	g/tgold from	318	to	322m	10 metres@14.60g/tgold from 271 to 281m

• DD infill drilling at McPhillamys returned numerous intersections of >1g gold mineralisation. Significant results from drilling during the quarter include:

211	metres @	1.85	g/t gold from	221	to	432m	107	metres @	2.19	g/t gold from	313	to	420m
189	metres@	1.61	g/tgold from	205	to	394m	115	metres@	2.57	g/tgold from	253	to	368m

• Regis has secured a viable process water supply for McPhillamys and expects to advance a maiden Reserve, Definitive Feasibility Study and commence the project development permitting process in the first half of FY2018.

Page 1

Quarterly Report to 30 June 2017

==> picture [124 x 37] intentionally omitted <==

DUKETON OPERATIONS

The Duketon Gold Project achieved record quarterly gold production of 90,428 ounces in the June 2017 quarter. This production is 14% higher than the previous quarter and reflects the significant benefit of a full quarter of higher grade ore feed from the Gloster and Erlistoun satellite operations.

The pre-royalty cash cost for the quarter of $723 per ounce and the all in sustaining cost (AISC) of $870 per ounce were reflective of the strong operating results at Duketon in the June 2017 quarter, with both well below the lower end of annual cost guidance for FY2016.

The strong June 2017 quarter saw annual FY17 gold production reach 324,353 ounces, which is at the upper end of annual production guidance range of 300,000 - 330,000 ounces. AISC of $945 per ounce for FY17 was below the annual cost guidance range of $980 - $1,050 per ounce.

Operating results for the Regis group for the June 2017 quarter were as follows:

	DNO	DSO	TOTAL
Ore mined(Mbcm)	0.57	0.82	1.39
Waste mined(Mbcm)	1.42	4.67	6.09
Strippingratio(w:o)	2.5	5.7	4.4
Ore mined (Mtonnes)	1.03	2.12	3.15
Ore milled (Mtonnes)	0.76	1.65	2.41
Headgrade(g/t)	1.32	1.20	1.23
Recovery(%)	94.3	94.3	94.3
Goldproduction(ounces)	30,520	59,908	90,428
Cash cost(A$/oz)	5632	804	723
Cash cost inc royalty (A$/oz)	6532	880	804
All in SustainingCost(A$/oz)1	6062	1,004	870

1 AISC calculated on a per ounce of production basis

2 Cash costs for DNO include an accounting adjustment to increase cost as stripping ratio for quarter was below the life of mine stripping ratio. This cost has been removed from AISC on same basis as above life of mine stripping costs are deferred (removed from cash cost) and are added back to AISC.

Duketon Northern Operations (DNO)

DNO produced 30,520 ounces of gold at an AISC of $606 per ounce in the June 2017 quarter. This is the highest quarterly production at DNO since the September 2014 quarter.

Gold production at DNO was up 19% from the March 2017 quarter as a result of an increase in grade and throughput at the Moolart Well processing facility. Grade improved by 5% from the previous quarter as a result of processing increased tonnage of higher grade ore feed from the Gloster satellite deposit. The previous quarter was affected by significant rainfall which restricted haulage of ore from Gloster. Throughput increased to an annualised rate of 3.1Mtpa in the June 2017 quarter, up 13% from the previous quarter, as regular haulage of oxide ore from the Gloster deposit resumed after rain affected haulage in the March 2017 quarter.

Page 2

Quarterly Report to 30 June 2017

==> picture [124 x 37] intentionally omitted <==

The DNO stripping ratio decreased from 4.5 to 2.5 in the June 2017 quarter as a result of the stripping ratio decreasing from 4.7 to 2.6 at the satellite Gloster project as mining levels in that pit reach main ore zones. The combination of higher DNO gold production and reduced stripping ratio saw AISC fall 23% to $606 per ounce for the quarter.

Annual gold production at DNO of 100,875 ounces at an AISC of $784 per ounce was the highest annual production at DNO since the 2014 financial year.

Duketon Southern Operations (DSO)

DSO produced 59,908 ounces of gold at an AISC of $1,004 per ounce in the June 2017 quarter. DSO gold production was 12% higher than the previous quarter as a result of improved grade and recoveries at the operation.

As expected mill throughput was up 5% on the previous quarter as supply of oxide ore from the south pit extension at Rosemont commenced and an increasing tonnage of oxide ore from Erlistoun had a positive impact on Garden Well throughput.

AISC of $1,004 per ounce for the June 2017 quarter was 12% lower than the March 2017 quarter, mainly as a result of stripping ratios across DSO falling from 8.3 to 5.7. In particular:

• the strip ratio at Erlistoun fell from 39:1 to 14.6:1 in the June 2017 quarter as the project trends towards the life of mine average of 8:1 over the coming quarters as ore tonnage in the pit increases with depth.

• the completion of the substantial FY2017 cutback programme in the March 2017 quarter meant the strip ratio at Rosemont fell from 13.5:1 to 6.9:1 in the current quarter.

• Mining at the Garden Well open pit during the quarter was at a strip ratio of 1.4:1 reflective of the low strip ratio remaining in the current open pit.

Development of the Erlistoun open pit and continuous delivery of higher grade ore to the Garden Well processing facility had a positive impact on the overall grade of the project. Accordingly the head grade at DSO increased by 6% to 1.20g/t for the quarter. The Garden Well and Rosemont head grades were in line with the previous quarter and in line with expectations.

Annual gold production at DSO was 223,478 ounces at an AISC of $1,017 per ounce.

Page 3

Quarterly Report to 30 June 2017

==> picture [124 x 37] intentionally omitted <==

CORPORATE

Cash Position

The Duketon project generated operating cash flow of $74.2 million in the June 2017 quarter. At the end of the quarter Regis had $151.7 million in cash and bullion, an increase of $37.2 million for the quarter. This increase is after the payment of $3.25 million for the Blayney Gold Project, $9.1 million in income tax payments, $10.0 million on exploration activities and $1.8 million on land and water acquisitions for the McPhillamys Project. The Company also received $4.3 million from the sale of its investment in Capricorn Metals during the quarter.

The following waterfall chart highlights the movement in Regis’ cash reserves over the quarter.

==> picture [367 x 117] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [367 x 117] intentionally omitted <==

Gold Sales & Hedging

During the June 2017 quarter, Regis sold 88,551 ounces of gold at an average price of A$1,678 per ounce (Mar17: 86,157 ounces at A$1,617 per ounce). The Company delivered the gold produced during the quarter into a combination of spot deferred contracts and at the prevailing spot price. The total hedging position at the end of the quarter was 396,406 ounces of spot deferred contracts with a delivery price of A$1,551 per ounce. In addition the Company had 15,000 ounces of call options with a strike price of $1,730 per ounce outstanding.

Regis also took advantage of low oil prices during the quarter to enter into additional commodity swap transactions to partially hedge future fluctuations in the AUD diesel price for the operating requirements of the Duketon Gold Project. Two tranches of hedging were added to the existing commodity swaps due to expire in October 2017. Regis’ diesel hedging is now as follows:

Volumeper month	Tenor	Price
2 million litres	1 May2016 to 31 October 2017	$A0.419/L
2 million litres	1 July 2017 to 30 June 2018	$A0.482/L
2 million litres	1 November 2017 to 30 June 2018	$A0.487/L

This additional hedging maintains the price protection of approximately two thirds of Regis’ diesel use over the next 12 months.

Page 4

Quarterly Report to 30 June 2017

==> picture [124 x 37] intentionally omitted <==

2018 GUIDANCE

Regis is expecting operations in FY2018 to build on the strong performance of the Duketon project in FY2017 where production of 324,353 ounces at AISC of $945/oz was achieved against guidance of 300 - 330koz at AISC of $980 - 1,050/oz. Gold production for FY2017 is expected to be in the following guidance range:

 Gold production: 335,000 – 365,000 ounces  Cash costs including royalties: $770 - 840 per ounce  All in Sustaining Cost $940 – 1,010 per ounce

Forecast 2018 production growth is the result of a full 12 months of positive grade impact from the satellite projects Gloster and Erlistoun.

Growth capital expenditure for 2018 is expected to be in the order of $23 million, largely related to the establishment costs of new operations at Tooheys Well and Baneygo commencing mining production during the year.

RESERVES AND RESOURCES

Group Ore Reserves

The JORC compliant Group Ore Reserves as at 31 March 2017 are estimated at 59.3 million tonnes at 1.14g/t Au for 2.18 million ounces of gold, compared with the estimate at 31 March 2016 of 60.8 million tonnes at 1.09g/t Au for 2.13 million ounces of gold.

The change in the Group Ore Reserve from March 2016 to March 2017 is as follows:

		Total Ore Reserve
	Tonnes (Mt)	Gold Grade (g/t)	Gold Metal (koz)
31 March 2016	60.8	1.09	2,125
Depleted by Mining to 31/3/17	-9.6	1.07	-331
31 March 2016 Net of Depletion	51.2	1.09	1,794
31 March 2017	59.3	1.14	2,182
% Variation net of Depletion	13%		18%

The re-estimation of Group Ore Reserves resulted in a 13% increase in tonnes and 18% increase in ounces after allowing for depletion by mining. This was primarily the result of:

• the inclusion of maiden Ore Reserve from Tooheys Well;

• a review of current pit design parameters including costs, metallurgical and geotechnical performance of mining projects to date; and

• the inclusion of further drilling results, particularly at Gloster.

Page 5

Quarterly Report to 30 June 2017

==> picture [124 x 37] intentionally omitted <==

Tooheys Well

In June 2017 Regis announced a maiden Ore Reserve at the Tooheys Well gold project of 366,000 ounces. The 100% owned project is located 2.5km south of the Garden Well gold mine and 5Mtpa processing plant. A breakdown of the Ore Reserve is shown below:

	Tonnes(MT)	Grade(g/t)	Ounces(000’s)
OreReserve (> 0.5g/tlowercut)	7.1	1.61	366

Key results of the Tooheys Well Ore Reserve studies include:

Physical	Tooheys Well
Total pit volume (Mbcm)	25.7
Strip Ratio (waste bcm:ore bcm)	8.8
Ore tonnes (Mt)	7.1
Ore grade (g/t)	1.61
Contained Ounces (koz’s)	366
Processing Recovery (%)	85% to 90% depending on the domain
Recovered Ounces (koz’s)	327

It is envisaged that open cut mining will provide a supplementary higher-grade ore supply for the existing Garden Well processing plant. Mining is expected to commence in the March 2018 quarter (subject to final statutory approvals) with ore haulage and gold production to follow in the December 2018 quarter. Utilisation of Regis’ 5Mtpa Garden Well processing plant will see Tooheys Well produce in the order of 90,000 ounces of gold per annum for approximately 3.5 years.

The Tooheys Well Ore Reserve has been estimated to a maximum pit depth of 230 metres. The top 30 metres from surface is relatively barren for most of the open pit, making the start-up strip ratio high. The strip ratio then falls sharply once main ore zones are reached. A cross section showing Tooheys Well gold mineralisation and reserve pit outline is shown below.

==> picture [333 x 270] intentionally omitted <==

Regis drilling at Tooheys Well on cross section 6909340mN. Holes drilled towards 270°.

Page 6

Quarterly Report to 30 June 2017

==> picture [124 x 37] intentionally omitted <==

Group Mineral Resources

The JORC compliant Group Mineral Resources as at 31 March 2017 are estimated to be 268.0 million tonnes at 0.93g/t Au for 8.05 million ounces of gold, compared with the estimate at 31 March 2016 of 261.7 million tonnes at 0.95g/t Au for 8.01 million ounces of gold. The change in the Group Mineral Resources is primarily due to the addition of Tooheys Well.

EXPLORATION

Overview

Exploration at Duketon during the June 2017 quarter mainly focused on extensional and infill drilling at the Rosemont underground project and RC drilling at the historic Reichelts Find open pit 12km south of Garden Well.

In NSW, the infill Diamond drilling programme at the McPhillamys project was completed to reduce the drill pattern across the deposit to a circa 50m x 25m pattern. Encouraging results were returned from this infill programme and are expected to form part of an updated Resource and maiden Ore Reserve estimation in the September 2017 quarter.

During the quarter Regis drilled a total of 53,270 metres across all projects as shown below:

Prospect	Project	Total Depth
Beamish	Duketon	797
Hack Bore	DKMJV	1,623
Hack Bore	Duketon	1,316
King John	Duketon	1,175
Old Peculiar	Duketon	2,124
Reichelts Find	Duketon	10,673
Rosemont	Duketon	10,993
Tooheys Well	Duketon	5,462
McPhillamys	McPhillamys	19,107
Total		53,270

Duketon Gold Project

During the June 2017 quarter a total of 34,163 metres of drilling was conducted across the Duketon tenements. RC drilling programmes re-commenced at Rosemont after completion of the Tooheys Well infill programme. Potential underground targets were drill tested at Rosemont Main Pit, South and North Pit. Encouraging results were received in all zones. In addition to Rosemont, initial RC drill programmes were completed at several historic resources with Reichelts Find, King John and Old Peculiar returning positive results.

The final two holes of the Tooheys Well infill programme were completed early in the quarter and an RC sterilisation drill programme for infrastructure at Tooheys Well and nearby Beamish commenced.

Page 7

Quarterly Report to 30 June 2017

==> picture [124 x 37] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [309 x 330] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [126 x 10] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text -----

Duketon tenement package
----- End of picture text -----

Rosemont Underground

Background

RC drilling completed over the September and December 2016 quarters demonstrated the potential for underground resource definition at the Rosemont Gold Mine, both underneath the main pit and along strike to the south. Drilling was temporarily suspended for the majority of the March 2017 quarter so that the RC rigs could complete the infill drilling at Tooheys Well. Drilling recommenced at Rosemont late in the March 2017 quarter.

The geology at Rosemont has gold hosted in a steeply east dipping 345° trending quartz-dolerite unit intruding into an ultramafic sequence. Gold mineralisation is associated with quartz-carbonatechlorite-sulphide alteration and is restricted to the quartz-dolerite unit which varies from 5 metres to >100 metres wide.

Results to date from both Rosemont Main Pit and South programmes have been very encouraging with numerous +20 gram-metre (gm) intervals returned from near surface to 300 metre vertical depth.

Page 8

Quarterly Report to 30 June 2017

==> picture [124 x 37] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [495 x 246] intentionally omitted <==

3D long section from south east showing planned Rosemont drilling, phase 1 and 2

Drilling has been conducted from within the open pit mine, considerably shortening the depth of holes required to test 100-200m vertically below the final pit design depth. Shorter holes also allow the use of RC rigs rather than diamond drill rigs. However, the drilling activities must fit in with mining operations in the pit and as a result the drill programme will extend beyond the current quarter.

Recent Drilling

RC drilling of underground targets at Rosemont recommenced late in the March 2017 quarter with 8 holes (3,301m) completed. In the June 2017 quarter, a further 44 holes for 10,993 metres were drilled. Drilling occurred over a 2.5-kilometre strike from Rosemont South to the north of the Main Pit.

Results to date from Rosemont have been very encouraging with numerous +20gm intervals returned over the 500m strike length from near surface to 300m vertical depth. Ongoing surface RC drilling will continue with a focus on establishing continuity and geometry of high grade gold mineralisation.

Determination of true width of intercepts to date is at an early stage, though as a general observation, the majority of high grade interceptions received to date are thought to be near vertical and therefore the true widths of reported intercepts will be less than reported.

The June 2017 quarter drilling included 14 holes for 2,687 metres in an initial RC drill programmes to the north of both Rosemont Main and North Pits. The aim of this drilling is to test for continuity of high grade mineralisation received in historic intercepts with a view to extending the open pit Reserve envelopes beyond current designs. This is similar to the drilling programmes conducted to the south of Main Pit in FY2016.

Page 9

Quarterly Report to 30 June 2017

==> picture [124 x 37] intentionally omitted <==

Significant Results

Significant gold results greater than 20 gram-metres received from drilling in the June 2017 quarter (holes RRLRMRC557-623) of both underground targets and open pit extension targets at Rosemont are shown below:

Hole_ID	AMG North AMG East EOH Depth From (m) To (m) Interval (m) Gold Grade (g/t)
RRLRMRC557	6919043 429057 472 351 361 10 5.39
RRLRMRC560	6921470 427569 105 70 80 10 5.47
RRLRMRC573	6918946 429050 300 265 270 5 18.84
RRLRMRC574	6921376 427530 200 150 153 3 31.57
RRLRMRC574	6921376 427530 200 176 180 4 7.28
RRLRMRC578	6921367 427652 114 9 15 6 3.95
RRLRMRC579	6919711 428631 376 213 217 4 23.93
RRLRMRC590	6918899 429032 184 175 177 2 22.30
RRLRMRC591	6918908 429058 357 218 234 16 3.59
RRLRMRC598	6920022 428401 261 191 196 5 10.25
RRLRMRC599	6920022 428401 227 174 180 6 28.70
RRLRMRC599	6920022 428401 227 192 194 2 35.50
RRLRMRC601	6921353 427612 163 9 11 2 16.45
RRLRMRC604	6919906 428434 245 135 136 1 59.70
RRLRMRC605	6919906 428433 263 216 219 3 21.52
RRLRMRC606	6920144 428376 332 201 202 1 68.60
RRLRMRC606	6920144 428376 332 262 267 5 11.16
RRLRMRC609	6921405 427543 160 52 53 1 26.30
RRLRMRC610	6920060 428390 252 195 197 2 93.00
RRLRMRC610	6920060 428390 252 200 210 10 43.84
RRLRMRC611	6920057 428391 306 216 222 6 16.57
RRLRMRC612	6920057 428391 300 271 281 10 14.60
RRLRMRC612	6920057 428391 300 284 291 7 33.86
RRLRMRC614	6920129 428381 317 287 294 7 18.75
RRLRMRC616	6920079 428385 243 176 180 4 6.21
RRLRMRC618	6919938 428390 383 349 353 4 8.38
RRLRMRC619	6920960 428037 404 318 322 4 53.37
RRLRMRC621	6919600 428680 407 231 235 4 12.86
RRLRMRC623	6919598 428683 385 199 200 1 21.40
RRLRMRC623	6919598 428683 385 284 286 2 19.60

All coordinates are AGD 84. Hole azimuths and dips for all holes are in table 2 at back of report All intercepts calculated using a 2.5g/t lower cut, no upper cut, maximum 2m internal dilution. All assays determined on 1m split samples by fire assay

Page 10

Quarterly Report to 30 June 2017

==> picture [124 x 37] intentionally omitted <==

Long Section & Cross Sections

A long section and cross section for the Main Pit area at Rosemont are shown below:

==> picture [509 x 231] intentionally omitted <==

Rosemont Main Pit Long Section with June quarter significant gold Intercepts

==> picture [256 x 108] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [256 x 107] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [256 x 107] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [99 x 8] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text -----

Cross section 79060mN
----- End of picture text -----

Section 79060mN shows holes RRLRMRC610-612 which all intersected high grade mineralisation. These intersections show strong vertical continuity of mineralisation.

Page 11

Quarterly Report to 30 June 2017

==> picture [124 x 37] intentionally omitted <==

Exploration Upside Rosemont

The areas of high grade mineralisation currently the focus of drilling programmes at Rosemont (Main Pit and South) comprise only a 1 kilometre portion of the 4-kilometre strike target at Rosemont. The remaining 3 kilometres of strike has seen very little historic drilling deeper than 150 metres below surface. This is similar to the paucity of earlier drilling in the area of currently defined mineralisation at Rosemont Main Pit and South projects prior to the recent successful RC programmes. Diamond drilling will commence this quarter and is anticipated to continue for the foreseeable future given the encouraging results received to date.

Underground Resource Estimate

RC drilling will continue from within the Rosemont Main Pit when coordination with mining activities allows. The aim of this drilling is to extend and infill high grade mineralisation. In addition, Regis will shortly commence diamond drilling at Rosemont to both verify existing RC derived high grade intercepts and to also gain structural and geotechnical information.

On completion of the first phase of the diamond drilling programme in the September 2017 quarter it is anticipated Regis will be in a position in the December 2017 quarter to estimate a maiden underground resource in relation to the initial areas drilled to date below and to the south of Rosemont Main Pit.

Reichelts Find

The Reichelts Find project is located 12 km south of the Garden Well gold mine. Prior production is believed to include small scale underground mining between 1912 and 1939 and a small oxide open pit operated by Ashton Mining in the late 1980’s. Gold mineralisation at Reichelts Find is hosted by a strongly sheared ultramafic-mafic-sediment package. Locally, gold is hosted by quartz veins and surrounding localised shear zones. Gold mineralisation extends over a +550m strike. Current JORC 2012 resources, reported at a 0.4g/t. Au cut-off grade are 0.8Mt @ 1.11g/t Au for 28koz.

A review of drill data for the Reichelts Find project has highlighted several historic high-grade intercepts located underneath the oxide pit. Only 12 RC holes have been drilled at more than 130m deep (down dip) along 1.4km of strike length.

Three of the 12 historic holes returned encouraging intercepts:

• Section 6901770mN: 21m @ 8.1 g/t from 147m,

• Section 6901670mN: 17m @ 8.0 g/t from 99m, and

• Section 6901510mN: 12m @ 10.8 g/t from 83m

• Section 6901670mN: 17m @ 8.0 g/t from 99m, and

During the quarter an RC drill programme of 70 RC drill holes for 9,099m was completed to target mineralisation both below and along strike of the existing pit to test the potential for both open pit and deeper high-grade underground resources. Encouraging intercepts returned included:

• 25m @ 2.85g/t Au from 86m RRLREIRC007

• 22m @ 2.70g/t Au from 61m RRLREIRC029

• 7m @ 5.66g/t Au from 81m RRLREIRC032

• 6m @ 4.47g/t Au from 159m RRLREIRC033

• 6m @ 4.10g/t Au from 196m RRLREIRC033

• 4m @ 5.71g/t Au from 129m RRLREIRC038

Page 12

Quarterly Report to 30 June 2017

==> picture [124 x 37] intentionally omitted <==

Further drilling is planned at Reichelts to follow up on these encouraging results.

==> picture [516 x 224] intentionally omitted <==

Reichelts Find Long Section with June 2017 significant gold intercepts

In addition to the infill drill programme at Reichelts, a wide spaced air core (AC) programme targeting extensions of gold mineralisation north of Reichelts Find returned anomalous intercepts. Results included:

• 4m @ 3.81g/t Au from 36m RRLREIAC006-620m north of historic pit

• 4m @ 2.03g/t Au from 16m RRLREIAC005-620m north of historic pit

These results will be reviewed and followed up with further drilling in due course.

King John

The King John Gold Project is located approximately 5km South West of Rosemont Gold Mine. A small programme of RC drilling was completed during the quarter with the aim of validating historic RC drilling from the late 1990’s. King John contains a JORC 2004 resource of 0.8Mt @1.56g/t Au for 42koz.

The project is located on the lithological contact of a NE gently dipping granodiorite hanging wall and andesite footwall. Quartz veining is common within the granodiorite in the ore zones. Pyrite is the dominant sulphide species with percentages reaching ~50% within altered, brecciated granodiorite zones. A large portion of the current gold resource is contained in oxidised material.

Drilling in the June 2017 quarter was completed on two traverses 20m north and south of a highgrade ore zone defined by historic drilling including 35m @ 5.29 g/t from 59m and 35m @ 1.85 g/t from 72m. Drilling during the quarter totalled 12 RC holes for 1,175m.

Page 13

Quarterly Report to 30 June 2017

==> picture [124 x 37] intentionally omitted <==

Significant results returned include:

• 6m @ 24.83g/t Au from 93m RRLKJRC012

• 32m @ 2.31g/t Au from 73m RRLKJRC016

• 13m @ 3.29g/t Au from 65m RRLKJRC011

• 18m @ 1.46g/t Au from 101m RRLKJRC014

A further programme of RC drilling is planned in order to produce a JORC 2012 compliant resource.

Old Peculiar

The Old Peculiar Gold Project located 2km south of Tooheys Well is a small historic laterite open pit mined in the 1990’s by Ashton Mining. Laterite mineralisation was drilled (and mined) to 15m vertical depth on a 10m x 20m grid. Historic deeper RC drilling on an approximately 20m x 40m drill spacing was also undertaken, though numerous gaps remain untested along a 160m strike.

Deeper drilling encountered down-dip extensions of mineralisation in the hypogene zone, which appears to be hosted predominantly in ultramafic schist and, to a lesser extent, within and at the contacts with sedimentary packages. Significant historical RC intercepts include:

• 25m @ 2.64g/t Au from 69m (JWMOPEC5)

• 11m @ 3.8g/t Au from 56m (ASHOP2)

• 15m @ 2.3g/t Au from 85m (JWMOPEC2)

• 13m @ 3.8mg/t Au from 62m (ASHOP19)

Regis drilled 14 holes of an RC Phase 1 programme during the June 2017 quarter for 2,124 metres. Significant returned assay results are summarised below:

• 16m @ 1.99g/t Au from 84m RRLOPRC011

• 17m @ 1.45g/t Au from 107m RRLOPRC012

• 17m @ 0.95g/t Au from 97m RRLKJRC010

• 13m @ 0.95g/t Au from 56m RRLKJRC013

All of the recent intercepts reported are hosted within the saprolite clays of the ultramafic unit. The results from the Phase 1 programme demonstrate the strike length of significant mineralisation at Old Peculiar is approximately 160m, with historical drilling in the north, and historical and Regis drilling in the south closing-off the known envelopes.

Duketon Gold Exploration Joint Venture (Regis Earning 75%)

Hacks Bore

The Hacks Bore Project is located 6-10 kilometres north along strike of Regis’ Garden Well mining operation. In late 2016, a second pass broad spaced air core drill programme of 47 holes for 4,214 metres tested for chert hosted mineralisation east of the Garden Well to Moolart Well shear zone looking for Tooheys Well analogues in the eastern metasediments. This air core drill programme did not return any significant assays.

During the quarter, a further phase of AC drilling was completed in the northern most area of Hacks Bore. Seventeen holes were drilled for 1,623m. The aim of this phase of drilling was to test the contact of the western ultramafic over a strike length of 2.5 km. No significant results were returned.

Page 14

Quarterly Report to 30 June 2017

==> picture [124 x 37] intentionally omitted <==

McPhillamys Gold Project NSW

The 100% Regis owned McPhillamys Gold Project is one of Australia’s larger undeveloped open pittable gold resources. The project is located approximately 250km west of Sydney, in Central West NSW, a well-established mining district. Regis has estimated a mineral resource estimate (“MRE”) of 73.2Mt @ 0.94g/t. Au for 2.2Moz at a 0.4 g/t Au cut-off grade.

==> picture [307 x 329] intentionally omitted <==

McPhillamys Gold Project and NSW Exploration leases location including the new Blayney tenement acquired.

An RC and diamond drill programme to infill the current drill pattern to a nominal 50 x 25 metre spacing was completed during the quarter. The results from the programme will be used to update the MRE and as a basis for a maiden reserve estimation expected to be completed in the September 2017 quarter. It was also designed to test for high grade extensions to the mineralisation at depth.

A total of 66 holes for 19,107m of mostly diamond drilling were drilled during the quarter taking the total drilling completed in this programme to 44,054m. Significant results returned include:

• 211m @ 1.85g/t Au from 221m in hole RRLMPDD177

• o 189m @ 1.61g/t Au from 205m

RRLMPDD186

• 115m @ 2.57g/t Au from 253m

• o 146m @ 1.64g/t Au from 218m o 107m @ 2.19g/t Au from 313m

RRLMPDD163

RRLMPDD185 RRLMPDD184

• 157m @ 1.49g/t Au from 309m RRLMPDD168

Page 15

Quarterly Report to 30 June 2017

==> picture [124 x 37] intentionally omitted <==

Assay results from this quarters drilling continued to return very large intercepts (100-200m down hole) of +1 g/t. Au mineralisation throughout the main ore zone. The horizontal widths of +1g mineralisation often exceed 150m which suggest McPhillamys will be very suitable to large scale open pit mining. Results also continue to correlate well with historic drilling. See plan below.

==> picture [347 x 465] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [319 x 10] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text -----

McPhillamys Gold Project Plan with June 2017 significant intercepts highlighted
----- End of picture text -----

An RC rig is currently on site conducting sterilisation drilling for planned infrastructure sites.

Page 16

Quarterly Report to 30 June 2017

==> picture [124 x 37] intentionally omitted <==

Development Update

Subsequent to the end of the quarter Regis announced that it had advanced the development of the McPhillamys Gold Project by progressing two long term water supply options for the project.

Option 1 – Water Supply from Mt Piper Power Station and Springvale Mine

Regis has had an ongoing dialogue with several parties including Centennial Coal Company Limited (Centennial) and Energy Australia Pty Ltd (EA) for Regis to utilise water from the Mt Piper Power Station and Springvale Mine near Lithgow. This negotiation has culminated in the execution of a nonbinding heads of agreement with those parties for the supply and offtake of water under the following agreed principles:

• Quantity of water in the order of 4-5GLpa, which would be sufficient to support a 7 million tonne per annum processing facility at McPhillamys;

• First availability of water around middle of calendar 2019, which allows for completion of the final offtake agreement, regulatory approvals and pipeline construction. This timing is suitable for Regis’ current development timetable;

• 10 year supply term with Regis having an option for a further 10 years, which shall not be unreasonably withheld by Centennial and EA;

• Water supply to be made available to Regis at no cost, however Regis will be responsible for all capital and operating costs associated with the required pumping and piping infrastructure required to deliver the water approximately 70km to the McPhillamys site.

The parties to the non-binding heads of agreement will now work towards finalising a binding agreement as soon as possible, with completion targeted for the September 2017 quarter.

Option 2 – Groundwater Access Licenses

Parallel with progressing the above water supply agreement, Regis has also contractually secured approximately 4.5GLpa of water through long term lease and acquisition of unused Water Access Licenses over ground water allocations in a zone of the Lachlan catchment approximately 80km from McPhillamys. As with Option 1, Regis would be responsible for all capital and operating costs associated with the required pumping and piping infrastructure required to deliver the water to the McPhillamys site. This represents a viable and contractually secured alternative source of secure water supply, sufficient for a 7Mtpa operation.

The Company is undertaking a definitive feasibility study in to the development of a 7mtpa mining and processing operation at McPhillamys. The DFS is expected to be completed in the December 2017 quarter.

Significant work has been completed towards finalising the EIS for the development of the project. Regis is aiming to submit a Conceptual Project Development Plan (CPDP) to the NSW Department of Planning & Environment (DPE) in the September 2017 quarter. This will commence the approvals process for the development of the project. It is then expected that the EIS will be submitted to the DPE by the end of the December 2017 quarter.

Page 17

Quarterly Report to 30 June 2017

==> picture [124 x 37] intentionally omitted <==

Blayney Gold Project

During the quarter, Regis completed the acquisition of the Blayney Gold Project with the payment of $3.25 million to the vendor, Aeris Resources Limited.

The Blayney Gold Project is an Exploration Licence located immediately west of the McPhillamys project licence. The Exploration Licence covers 493 square kilometres and hosts two historic gold deposits Discovery Ridge and Bald Hill- see project plan above for locations relative to McPhillamys.

The Blayney Gold Project is reported to host Mineral Resources at two gold deposits. Discovery Ridge has an Indicated and Inferred MRE of 13.84Mt at 1.1g/t Au for 501,000 ounces and Bald Hill has an Inferred MRE of 37.0Mt at 0.5g/t Au for 595,000 ounces. Both Discovery Ridge and Bald Hill Mineral Resource Estimates were reported by Aeris Resources Limited under the JORC Code 2004. An update to the Discovery Ridge Resource to make it compliant with JORC 20121 is expected in the September 2017 quarter.

Discovery Ridge Gold Deposit

Discovery Ridge is a shear hosted gold deposit located in strongly foliated, fine-grained metasediments of the Ordovician Coombing and Adaminaby Formations. The deposit is located within the hinge zone of a tight, steep north plunging D2 fold on the contact of the Adaminaby Group with the Coombing Formation. The deposit has a known strike length in the order of 200 metres and comprises a well-defined steeply north pitching East Lode with widths of around 50 metres and known depths of up to 500 metres and a parallel but more diffuse West Lode of similar orientation.

==> picture [241 x 128] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [241 x 128] intentionally omitted <==

Discovery Ridge cross section 22,400mN (local grid)

A 6,000m infill drilling programme consisting of RC and diamond drilling is planned to commence at Discovery Ridge in the September 2017 quarter. The programme is aimed at providing enough information to allow the estimation of a maiden Reserve at Discovery Ridge in the December 2017 quarter.

Page 18

Quarterly Report to 30 June 2017

==> picture [124 x 37] intentionally omitted <==

COMPETENT PERSON STATEMENT

The information in this report that relates to exploration results is based on and fairly represents information and supporting documentation that has been compiled by Mr Peter Woodman who is a member of the Australian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy. Mr Woodman has sufficient experience which is relevant to the style of mineralisation and type of deposit under consideration and to the activity which he is undertaking to qualify as a Competent Person as defined in the 2012 edition of the ‘Australasian Code for the Reporting of Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves’. Mr Woodman is a full time employee of Regis Resources Ltd and consents to the inclusion in the report of the matters based on his information in the form and context in which it appears.

The information in this report that relates to the Company’s Resources and Ore Reserves is extracted from the ASX announcement released on 14 July 2017 entitled “Mineral Resource and Ore Reserve Statement as at 31 March 2017” and for which Competent Person’s consents were obtained.

The reports are available to view on the ASX website and on the Company’s website at www.regisresources.com.au. The Company confirms it is not aware of any new information or data that materially affects the information included in the original market announcement, and, in the case of estimates of Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves, that all market assumptions and technical assumptions underpinning the estimates in the relevant market announcement continue to apply and have not materially changed.

The Competent Person’s consents remain in place for subsequent releases by the Company of the same information in the same form and context, until the consent is withdrawn or replaced by a subsequent report and accompanying consent.

FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS

This ASX announcement may contain forward looking statements that are subject to risk factors associated with gold exploration, mining and production businesses. It is believed that the expectations reflected in these statements are reasonable but they may be affected by a variety of variables and changes in underlying assumptions which could cause actual results or trends to differ materially, including but not limited to price fluctuations, actual demand, currency fluctuations, drilling and production results, Reserve estimations, loss of market, industry competition, environmental risks, physical risks, legislative, fiscal and regulatory changes, economic and financial market conditions in various countries and regions, political risks, project delay or advancement, approvals and cost estimates.

Forward-looking statements, including projections, forecasts and estimates, are provided as a general guide only and should not be relied on as an indication or guarantee of future performance and involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors, many of which are outside the control of Regis Resources Ltd. Past performance is not necessarily a guide to future performance and no representation or warranty is made as to the likelihood of achievement or reasonableness of any forward looking statements or other forecast.

Page 19

Quarterly Report to 30 June 2017

==> picture [124 x 37] intentionally omitted <==

CORPORATE DIRECTORY

Regis Resources Ltd ( ACN 009 174 761)

Registered Office

First Floor, 1 Alvan Street Subiaco, WA Australia 6008 Tel +618 9442 2200 Fax +618 9442 2290

Website www.regisresources.com Email enquiries@regisresources.com

Directors

Mr Mark Clark (Executive Chairman) Mr Paul Thomas (Executive Director) Mr Mark Okeby (Non-Executive Deputy Chairman) Mr Ross Kestel (Non-Executive Director) Mr James Mactier (Non-Executive Director) Mrs Fiona Morgan (Non-Executive Director)

Company Secretary and CFO

Mr Kim Massey

Share Registry

Computershare Ltd GPO Box D182 Perth WA 6840

Shareholder Enquiries: 1300 557 010 (local) +613 9415 4000 (international)

ASX Listed Securities (as at 30 June 2017)

Security	Code		No. Quoted
Ordinary Shares	RRL		501,019,903

Page 20

Quarterly Report to 30 June 2017

==> picture [125 x 37] intentionally omitted <==

APPENDIX 1

JORC Code, 2012 Edition – Table 1 report template

Section 1 Sampling Techniques and Data

(Criteria in this section apply to all succeeding sections.)

	Criteria	JORC Code explanation			Commentary
	Sampling techniques	Nature and quality of sampling (e.g. cut channels, random chips, or specific specialised industry standard measurement tools appropriate to the minerals under investigation, such as down hole gamma sondes, or handheld XRF instruments, etc). These			Rosemont, King John: The projects above were sampled using Reverse Circulation (RC) drill holes on a nominal 20m east by 20m north initial grid spacing angled -60 degrees to 254 degrees.
		examples should not be taken as limiting the broad meaning of			Tooheys Well, Reichelts Find, Hacks Bore & Old Peculiar:
		sampling.			The projects above were sampled using Reverse Circulation (RC), drill holes on a nominal 20m east by 20m north initial grid spacing angled -60 degrees to 270
					degrees.
					McPhillamys:
					The McPhillamys gold deposit was sampled using Diamond Drilling (DD) drill holes
					on a nominal 25m east by 50m north initial grid spacing, which were drilled angled
					-60 degrees to 270 degrees azimuth.
		Include reference to measures taken to ensure sample representivity and the appropriate calibration of any measurement tools or systems used.			All Projects: Regis drill hole collar locations were picked up by site-based authorised surveyors using Trimble RTK GPS. Downhole surveying was measured by using either a Reflex EZ-Shot Downhole Survey Instrument or North Seeking Gyro based tool
					where magnetic host rock would affect azimuth readings. The surveys were
					completed every 30m down each drill hole.
					Core is aligned and measured by tape, comparing back to down hole core blocks
					consistent with industry practice.
					Regis drill hole sampling had certified standards and blanks inserted every 25th
					sample to assess the accuracy and methodology of the external laboratories, and
					field duplicates (RC only) were inserted every 20th sample to assess the
					repeatability and variability of the gold mineralisation. Laboratory duplicates were
					also completed approximately every 15th sample to assess the precision of the

Page 21

Quarterly Report to 30 June 2017

==> picture [124 x 37] intentionally omitted <==

	Criteria	JORC Code explanation	Commentary
			laboratory as well as the repeatability and variability of the gold mineralisation.
			Results of the QAQC sampling were considered acceptable for an Archaean gold
			deposit.
		Aspects of the determination of mineralisation that are Material to the Public Report. In cases where ‘industry standard’ work has been done this would be relatively simple (e.g. ‘reverse circulation drilling was used to obtain 1 m samples from which 3 kg was	Rosemont, Reichelts Find, Hacks Bore, King John, Old Peculiar & Tooheys Well: For the Regis RC and AC drilling 1m samples were obtained by cone splitter (2.5kg – 3.0kg) and were utilised for lithology logging and assaying. The drilling samples were dried, crushed and pulverised to get 85% passing 75µm and were all Fire
		pulverised to produce a 30 g charge for fire assay’). In other cases,	Assayed using a 50g charge (SGS, Bureau Veritas, Min Analytical and Aurum).
		more explanation may be required, such as where there is coarse gold that has inherent sampling problems. Unusual commodities or	4m field composites were sampled using a spear on the individual 1m samples at Hacks Bore and Commonwealth.
		mineralisation types (e.g. submarine nodules) may warrant	McPhillamys diamond:
		disclosure of detailed information.	Diamond drilling completed to industry standard using varying sample lengths (0.3
			to 1.2m) based on geological intervals, which are then dried, crushed and
			pulverised to get 85% passing 75µm and were all Fire Assayed using a 50g charge
			(ALS-Orange, SGS West Wyalong).
	Drilling techniques	Drill type (e.g. core, reverse circulation, open-hole hammer, rotary air blast, auger, Bangka, sonic, etc) and details (e.g. core diameter, triple or standard tube, depth of diamond tails, face-sampling bit or other type, whether core is oriented and if so, by what method, etc).	Rosemont, Reichelts Find, Hacks Bore, King John, Old Peculiar & Tooheys Well: RC drilling completed with a 139mm diameter face sampling hammer AC drilling was completed with an 89mm diameter AC blade bit.
			McPhillamys diamond:
			Surface diamond drilling carried out by using both NQ3 or HQ32 (triple tube) and
			NQ2 or HQ2 (standard tube) techniques.
			Core is routinely orientated by REFLEX ACT III tool.
	Drill sample recovery	Method of recording and assessing core and chip sample recoveries and results assessed.	Rosemont, Reichelts Find, Hacks Bore, King John, Old Peculiar & Tooheys Well: RC and AC recovery was visually assessed, with recovery being excellent except
			in some wet intervals which are recorded on logs. <1% of the overall mineralised
			zones have been recorded as wet.
			McPhillamys diamond:
			DD core was measured and compared to the drilled intervals, and recorded as a
			percentage recovery

Page 22

Quarterly Report to 30 June 2017

==> picture [124 x 37] intentionally omitted <==

	Criteria	JORC Code explanation	Commentary
		Measures taken to maximise sample recovery and ensure representative nature of the samples.	Rosemont, Reichelts Find, Hacks Bore, King John, Old Peculiar & Tooheys Well: RC and AC samples were visually checked for recovery, moisture and
			contamination. The drilling contractor utilised a cyclone and splitter to provide
			uniform sample size, and these were cleaned routinely (cleaned at the end of each
			rod and more frequently in wet conditions). A booster was also used in conjunction
			with the RC drill rig to ensure dry samples are achieved.
			McPhillamys diamond:
			The target zones ranged from oxidised rock near surface where recoveries were
			lower to highly competent fresh rock, where the DD method provided high
			recovery.
		Whether a relationship exists between sample recovery and grade and whether sample bias may have occurred due to preferential loss/gain of fine/coarse material.	Rosemont, Reichelts Find, Hacks Bore, King John, Old Peculiar & Tooheys Well: Sample recoveries for RC and AC drilling are visually estimated to be medium to high. No significant bias is expected although no recovery and grade correlation
			study was completed.
			McPhillamys diamond:
			The DD drill sample recovery in the transitional and fresh rock zones is very high,
			and no significant bias is expected. Recoveries in the oxidised rock were lower.
	Logging	Whether core and chip samples have been geologically and geotechnically logged to a level of detail to support appropriate Mineral Resource estimation, mining studies and metallurgical studies.	Rosemont, Reichelts Find, Hacks Bore, King John, Old Peculiar & Tooheys Well: Lithology, alteration, veining, mineralisation and, on some holes, magnetic susceptibility were logged from the RC chips and saved in the database. Chips from every interval are also placed in chip trays and stored in a designated building
			at site for future reference.

Page 23

Quarterly Report to 30 June 2017

==> picture [124 x 37] intentionally omitted <==

	Criteria	JORC Code explanation	Commentary
			McPhillamys diamond:
			Lithology, alteration, veining, mineralisation and geotechnical information were
			logged from the DD core and saved in the database. Half core from every interval
			are also retained in the core trays and stored in a designated building at site for
			future reference.
		Whether logging is qualitative or quantitative in nature. Core (or costean, channel, etc) photography.	All logging is qualitative except for magnetic susceptibility and geotechnical measurements. Wet and dry photographs were completed on the core.
		The total length and percentage of the relevant intersections	All drill holes are logged in full.
		logged.
	Sub- sampling techniques and sample	If core, whether cut or sawn and whether quarter, half or all core taken.	McPhillamys diamond: Core was half cut with a diamond core saw with the same half always sampled and the surplus retained in the core trays. Non-competent clay zones are sampled as whole core where necessary due to difficulty in cutting.
	preparation
		If non-core, whether riffled, tube sampled, rotary split, etc and whether sampled wet or dry.	The RC and AC drilling utilised a cyclone and cone splitter to consistently produce 0.5kg to 3.0kg dry samples.
		For all sample types, the nature, quality and appropriateness of the sample preparation technique.	Samples are dried, crushed to 10mm, and then pulverised to 85% passing 75µm (industry standard practice is assumed for the historical drilling). This is considered acceptable.
		Quality control procedures adopted for all sub-sampling stages to maximise representivity of samples.	Field duplicates (RC, AC) were inserted every 20th sample to assess the repeatability and variability of the gold mineralisation. Laboratory duplicates were also completed roughly every 15th sample to assess the repeatability and
			variability of the gold mineralisation.

Page 24

Quarterly Report to 30 June 2017

==> picture [124 x 37] intentionally omitted <==

	Criteria	JORC Code explanation	Commentary
		Measures taken to ensure that the sampling is representative of the in situ material collected, including for instance results for field duplicate/second-half sampling.	Field RC duplicates (RC, AC) were taken at the rig from a second chute on the cone splitter allowing for the duplicate and main sample to be the same size and sampling technique. Field duplicates are taken every 20th sample. Laboratory duplicates (sample preparation split) were also completed roughly every 15th
			sample.
			Field duplicates on core, i.e. other half of cut core, have not been routinely
			assayed.
		Whether sample sizes are appropriate to the grain size of the material being sampled.	Sample sizes (1.0kg to 3kg) are considered to be a sufficient size to accurately represent the gold mineralisation based on the mineralisation style (hypogene) associated with shearing and supergene enrichment), the width and continuity of
			the intersections, the sampling methodology, the coarse gold variability and the
			assay ranges for the gold.
			Field duplicates have routinely been collected to ensure monitoring of the sub-
			sampling quality. Acceptable precision and accuracy is noted in the field
			duplicates albeit the precision is marginally acceptable and consistent with a
			coarse gold deposit.
	Quality of assay data and laboratory	The nature, quality and appropriateness of the assaying and laboratory procedures used and whether the technique is considered partial or total.	Rosemont, Reichelts Find, Hacks Bore, King John, Old Peculiar & Tooheys Well: All gold assaying was completed by external commercial laboratories (SGS, Bureau Veritas, Min Analytical and Aurum) using either a 40g or 50g charge for fire assay analysis with AAS finish. This technique is industry standard for gold
	tests		and considered appropriate.
			McPhillamys diamond:
			All gold assaying will be completed by commercial laboratories (ALS-Orange,
			NSW, SGS West Wyalong) using either a 40g or 50g charge for fire assay analysis
			with AAS finish. This technique is industry standard for gold and considered
			appropriate.
		For geophysical tools, spectrometers, handheld XRF instruments, etc, the parameters used in determining the analysis including	Rosemont, Reichelts Find, Hacks Bore, King John, Old Peculiar & Tooheys Well: Apart from magnetic susceptibility in targeted zones, no other geophysical
			measurements were routinely made.

Page 25

Quarterly Report to 30 June 2017

==> picture [124 x 37] intentionally omitted <==

	Criteria	JORC Code explanation	Commentary
		instrument make and model, reading times, calibrations factors
		applied and their derivation, etc.
		Nature of quality control procedures adopted (e.g. standards, blanks, duplicates, external laboratory checks) and whether acceptable levels of accuracy (ie lack of bias) and precision have been established.	Certified Reference Material (CRM or standards) and blanks were inserted every 25th sample to assess the assaying accuracy of the external laboratories. Field duplicates (RC, AC) were inserted every 20th sample to assess the repeatability from the field and variability of the gold mineralisation. Laboratory duplicates were also completed approximately every 15th sample to assess the precision of
			assaying.
			Evaluation of both the Regis submitted standards, and the internal laboratory
			quality control data, indicates assaying to be accurate and without significant drift
			for significant time periods. Excluding obvious errors, the vast majority of the CRM
			assaying report shows an overall mean bias of less than 5% with no consistent
			positive or negative bias noted. Duplicate assaying show high levels of correlation
			and no apparent bias between the duplicate pairs. Field duplicate samples show
			marginally acceptable levels of correlation and no relative bias.
			Results of the QAQC sampling were considered acceptable for the deposits.
			Substantial focus has been given to ensuring sampling procedures met industry
			best practise to ensure acceptable levels of accuracy and precision were achieved
			in a coarse gold environment.
	Verification of sampling and assaying	The verification of significant intersections by either independent or alternative company personnel.	No independent personnel have visually inspected the significant intersections in RC chips. Numerous highly qualified and experienced company personnel from exploration and production positions have visually inspected the significant intersections in RC chips.
		The use of twinned holes.	Reichelts Find, Hacks Bore, Old Peculiar:
			No twinning of holes was completed at this stage.
			Rosemont King John &Tooheys Well:
			No twinning of holes was completed in the current quarter.

Page 26

Quarterly Report to 30 June 2017

==> picture [124 x 37] intentionally omitted <==

	Criteria	JORC Code explanation	Commentary
		Documentation of primary data, data entry procedures, data verification, data storage (physical and electronic) protocols.	All geological and field data is entered into excel spreadsheets with lookup tables and fixed formatting (and protected from modification) thus only allowing data to be entered using the Regis geological code system and sample protocol. Data is
			then emailed to the Regis database administrator for validation and importation
			into a SQL database using Datashed.
		Discuss any adjustment to assay data.	Any samples not assayed (i.e. destroyed in processing, listed not received) have had the assay value converted to a -9 in the database. Any samples assayed
			below detection limit (0.01 ppm Au) have been converted to 0.005 ppm (half
			detection limit) in the database.
	Location of data points	Accuracy and quality of surveys used to locate drill holes (collar and down-hole surveys), trenches, mine workings and other locations used in Mineral Resource estimation.	Regis drill hole collar locations were picked up by site-based authorized surveyors using Trimble RTK GPS, calibrated to a base station (expected accuracy of 20mm).
			Downhole surveying was measured by using either a Reflex EZ-Shot Downhole
			Survey Instrument or North Seeking Gyro based tool where magnetic host rock
			would affect azimuth readings
			The surveys were completed every 30m down each drill hole.
		Specification of the grid system used.	The grid system is and AMG Zone 51 (AGD 84) for surveying pickups. Modelling at Rosemont is completed using a local grid, with conversion of digital data from
			AMG to local completed using macros.
			McPhillamys
			The grid system is and GDA94 Zone 55 for surveying pickups, as well as any
			modelling.
		Quality and adequacy of topographic control.	The topographic surface for all projects were derived from a combination of the primary drill hole pickups and the pre-existing photogrammetric contouring.
	Data spacing and distribution	Data spacing for reporting of Exploration Results.	Rosemont, Reichelts Find, King John & Old Peculiar: The drilling completed this period is the start of reducing the effective spacing to 20 metres (east) by 20 metres (north) to a depth of 300 metres from surface.
			Hacks Bore:
			The initial RC drill hole spacing was ranged from 160-400m (northing) by 160m
			(easting). The drilling depth was generally to blade refusal i.e. top of fresh rock.

Page 27

Quarterly Report to 30 June 2017

==> picture [124 x 37] intentionally omitted <==

	Criteria	JORC Code explanation	Commentary
			Tooheys Well:
			The infill drilling completed this period reduced the effective spacing to 20 metres
			(east) by 20 metres (north) to a depth of 250 metres from surface in selected parts
			of the deposit.
			McPhillamys:
			Current plan is to reduce sample spacing to 25mx25m in selected parts of the
			deposit
		Whether the data spacing and distribution is sufficient to establish the degree of geological and grade continuity appropriate for the Mineral Resource and Ore Reserve estimation procedure(s) and classifications applied.	Rosemont, Reichelts Find, King John, Old Peculiar, Tooheys Well & McPhillamys: The planned data spacing and distribution is sufficient to demonstrate spatial and grade continuity of the mineralised domains to support the definition of Inferred and Indicated Mineral Resources under the 2012 JORC code once all other
			modifying factors have been addressed.
			Hacks Bore:
			The data spacing and distribution is sufficient to for a reconnaissance exploration
			drilling programme designed to test for extensions to known mineralisation to the
			south
		Whether sample compositing has been applied.	Rosemont, Reichelts Find, King John, Old Peculiar, Tooheys Well & McPhillamys:
			No sample compositing has been applied in the field within the mineralised zones.
			Hacks Bore:
			4m compositing was used in the wider spaced drill programmes.
	Orientation of data in relation to geological	Whether the orientation of sampling achieves unbiased sampling of possible structures and the extent to which this is known, considering the deposit type.	Drilling on all projects is orientated to best suit the mineralisation to be closely perpendicular to both the strike and dip of the mineralisation. Intercepts are close to true-width in most cases. See cross section diagrams. In the case of Rosemont underground drill programmes, the current drilling is designed to assist in determining ore geometry and therefore a more accurate estimate of true
	structure		thickness
		If the relationship between the drilling orientation and the orientation	It is not believed that drilling orientation has introduced a sampling bias.
		of key mineralised structures is considered to have introduced a
		sampling bias, this should be assessed and reported if material.

Page 28

Quarterly Report to 30 June 2017

==> picture [124 x 37] intentionally omitted <==

	Criteria	JORC Code explanation	Commentary
	Sample security	The measures taken to ensure sample security.	Samples are securely sealed and stored onsite, until delivery to Perth via contract freight Transport, who then deliver the samples directly to the laboratory. Sample submission forms are sent with the samples as well as emailed to the laboratory,
			and are used to keep track of the sample batches.
			McPhillamys
			Samples are securely sealed and stored onsite, until pickup by ALS or SGS truck
			and delivery to Orange or West Wyalong laboratory. Sample submission forms
			are sent with the samples as well as emailed to the laboratory, and are used to
			keep track of the sample batches.
	Audits or	The results of any audits or reviews of sampling techniques and	No external audits on sampling techniques and data have been completed.
	reviews	data.

Page 29

Quarterly Report to 30 June 2017

==> picture [124 x 37] intentionally omitted <==

Section 2 Reporting of Exploration Results

(Criteria listed in the preceding section also apply to this section.)

	Criteria	JORC Code explanation	Commentary
	Mineral tenement and land tenure status	Type, reference name/number, location and ownership including agreements or material issues with third parties such as joint ventures, partnerships, overriding royalties, native title interests, historical sites, wilderness or national park and environmental	Rosemont: The Rosemont project is located on M38/237, 250 & 343). Current registered holders of the tenements are Regis Resources Ltd & Duketon Resources Pty Ltd (100% subsidiary of Regis Resources). Area = 1683.2ha. Normal Western Australian state royalties apply plus there is a 2% Royalty to
		settings.	Franco Nevada. There are no registered Native Title Claims.
		The security of the tenure held at the time of reporting along with	Reichelts Find:
		any known impediments to obtaining a licence to operate in the	The project is located on M38/341. Current registered holders of the tenement is
		area.	Regis Resources Ltd and Duketon Resources Pty Ltd (100% subsidiary of Regis
			Resources). Area = 241.65ha. Normal Western Australian state royalties apply
			plus there is a 2% Royalty to Franco Nevada. There are no registered Native Title
			Claims.
			King John:
			The project is located on M38/600. Current registered holders of the tenement is
			Duketon Resources Pty Ltd (100% subsidiary of Regis Resources) and Mr Mark
			Gareth Creasy (30%). Area = 917.30ha. Murphy Hills Joint Venture agreement
			with Creasy free-carried to completion of Bankable Feasibility Study. Normal
			Western Australian state royalties apply plus there is a 2% Royalty to Franco
			Nevada (no royalties applicable in Murphy Hills JV agreement). There are no
			registered Native Title Claims.
			Old Peculiar:
			The project is located on M38/292. Current registered holders of the tenement is
			Regis Resources Ltd and Duketon Resources Pty Ltd (100% subsidiary of Regis
			Resources). Area = 651.65ha. Normal Western Australian state royalties apply
			plus there is a 2% Royalty to Franco Nevada. There are no registered Native Title
			Claims.
			Hacks Bore
			The Hacks Bore prospect is E38/2666 blocks (actual 6160ha). Owner is Duketon
			MiningLtd. There are no registered Native Title Claims

Page 30

Quarterly Report to 30 June 2017

==> picture [124 x 37] intentionally omitted <==

	Criteria	JORC Code explanation	Commentary
			Tooheys Well:
			The Tooheys Well prospect comprises M38/1251, an area of 9.109 km2 (910.90
			hectares). Normal Western Australian state royalties apply and a further 2% NSR
			royalty exists to a third party.Current registered holders of the tenements are
			Regis Resources Ltd and Duketon Resources Pty Ltd (100% subsidiary of Regis
			Resources). There are no registered Native Title Claims.
			McPhillamys
			The McPhillamys deposit is located on the recently granted tenement EL5760
			granted in 2000., Lease area = 11,760Ha. Current registered holder of the
			tenement is LFB Resources NL (100% subsidiary of Regis Resources). Normal
			NSW state royalties apply. There are no registered Native Title Claims.
	Exploration done by other parties	Acknowledgment and appraisal of exploration by other parties.	Rosemont, Reichelts Find, King John & Old Peculiar: Shallow drilling (less than 100m vertical depth) completed by Aurora, Ashton and Johnsons Well Mining in the 1990’s.
			Tooheys Well:
			Minor amounts of drilling by Ashton and Johnsons Well Mining was completed
			although it was mainly shallow and not extensive enough to properly define the
			mineralisation.
			McPhillamys
			Resource development drilling conducted by Newmont and then Alkane
			Resources in the 1990’s
	Geology	Deposit type, geological setting and style of mineralisation.	Rosemont: Gold is hosted in a steeply east dipping 345° trending quartz-dolerite unit intruding
			an ultramafic sequence. Gold mineralisation is associated with quartz-carbonate-
			chlorite-sulphide alteration and is restricted to the quartz dolerite unit which is
			generally approximately 80m wide. Weathering depths vary from 20m to 50m
			vertical depth.
			Reichelts Find:
			Gold mineralisation at Reichelts Find is hosted by a strongly sheared ultramafic-
			mafic unit. Historical reports mentioned that gold is hosted by quartz veins and
			surroundinglocalised shear zones.

Page 31

Quarterly Report to 30 June 2017

==> picture [124 x 37] intentionally omitted <==

	Criteria	JORC Code explanation	Commentary
			King John:
			The project sits on the lithological contact of a NE gently dipping granodiorite
			hanging wall and andesite footwall. Quartz veining is common within the
			granodiorite in the ore zones. Pyrite is the dominant sulphide species with
			percentages reaching ~50% within altered, brecciated granodiorite zones. A
			large portion of the current gold resource is contained in oxidised material.
			Old Peculiar:
			Gold is hosted within quartz-sulphide veining with proximal fuchsite-carbonate-
			chlorite-silica-pyrite alteration. In the saprolite this alteration assemblage is
			weathered to hematite/goethite-ankerite-silica, with no to very little talc
			remaining.
			Hacks Bore:
			Geology at Hacks Bore appears to consist of sheared ultramafics. A 15m to 20m
			transported cover sequence conceals the shear zone target and weathering
			extends up to 100m depth.
			Tooheys Well:
			The gold mineralisation is hosted in a vertical dipping North-South trending
			Banded Iron Formation (BIF). Gold mineralisation is associated with sulphides
			(Pyrrhotite) replacing magnetite in the BIF. Weathering depths vary from 20m to
			70m vertical depth.
			McPhillamys
			The McPhillamys gold deposit is hosted in Silurian aged sheared intermediate
			volcaniclastic rocks in the Lachlan Fold Belt. Gold mineralisation is associated with
			strongly sheared volcaniclastics with strong quartz-carbonate-sericite-pyrite-
			pyrrhotite alteration. The gold mineralisation trends roughly north-south over a
			strike distance of 900m and dips steeplyeast at 70º to 80º.
	Drill hole	A summary of all information material to the understanding of the	Refer to body of announcement and Appendix 2.
	Information	exploration results including a tabulation of the following information
		for all Material drill holes:
		easting and northing of the drill hole collar

Page 32

Quarterly Report to 30 June 2017

==> picture [124 x 37] intentionally omitted <==

	Criteria	JORC Code explanation	Commentary
		elevation or RL (Reduced Level – elevation above sea level in
		metres) of the drill hole collar
		dip and azimuth of the hole
		down hole length and interception depth
		hole length.
		If the exclusion of this information is justified on the basis that the
		information is not Material and this exclusion does not detract from
		the understanding of the report, the Competent Person should
		clearly explain why this is the case.
	Data aggregation methods	In reporting Exploration Results, weighting averaging techniques, maximum and/or minimum grade truncations (e.g. cutting of high grades) and cut-off grades are usually Material and should be	Except for Rosemont and McPhillamys, reported intercepts include a minimum of 0.5 g/t Au value over a minimum distance of 1m with a maximum 2m consecutive internal waste. No upper cuts have been applied.
		stated.
		Where aggregate intercepts incorporate short lengths of high grade results and longer lengths of low grade results, the procedure used for such aggregation should be stated and some typical examples	Rosemont: Reported intercepts include a minimum of 2.5 g/t Au value over a minimum distance of 1m with a maximum 2m consecutive internal waste. No upper cuts have been applied.
		of such aggregations should be shown in detail.	McPhillamys:
		The assumptions used for any reporting of metal equivalent values	Reported intercepts include a minimum of 0.4 g/t Au value over a minimum
		should be clearly stated.	distance of 1m with a maximum 6m consecutive internal waste. No upper cuts have been applied.
	Relationship between mineralisation widths and intercept	These relationships are particularly important in the reporting of Exploration Results. If the geometry of the mineralisation with respect to the drill hole angle is known, its nature should be reported.	Rosemont & Old Peculiar & King John: The Rosemont South drill holes were nominally drilled at -60º to 254° (KJ-247) and the mineralised zone is sub-vertical. The intercepts reported are close to true width in some cases, and are not true width where the mineralisation is steepest. Tooheys Well, Reichelts Find & Hacks Bore:
	lengths		The Tooheys Well drill holes were drilled at -60º to 270° and the mineralised zone is moderately east dipping. The intercepts reported are close to true width.

Page 33

Quarterly Report to 30 June 2017

==> picture [124 x 37] intentionally omitted <==

	Criteria	JORC Code explanation	Commentary
		If it is not known and only the down hole lengths are reported, there should be a clear statement to this effect (e.g. ‘down hole length, true width not known’).	Hacks Bore: The holes at which were drilled angled -60 degrees at 090 azimuths. The intercepts reported are close to true width.
			McPhillamys:
			The holes at were drilled at -60º to 270° and the mineralised zone is steeply east
			dipping. The intercepts reported can overstate true widths.
	Diagrams	Appropriate maps and sections (with scales) and tabulations of	Refer to the body of the announcement.
		intercepts should be included for any significant discovery being
		reported These should include, but not be limited to a plan view of
		drill hole collar locations and appropriate sectional views.
	Balanced	Where comprehensive reporting of all Exploration Results is not	A list of all holes drilled during the quarter attached in Appendix 2.
	reporting	practicable, representative reporting of both low and high grades
		and/or widths should be practiced to avoid misleading reporting of
		Exploration Results.
	Other substantive exploration	Other exploration data, if meaningful and material, should be reported including (but not limited to): geological observations; geophysical survey results; geochemical survey results; bulk	Rosemont, Reichelts Find, Hacks Bore, King John, Old Peculiar, Tooheys Well: No other material exploration data to report.
	data	samples – size and method of treatment; metallurgical test results; bulk density, groundwater, geotechnical and rock characteristics; potential deleterious or contaminating substances.	McPhillamys: The McPhillamys diamond holes were also utilised for bulk density measurements. Geotechnical logging has been completed for determining ground conditions for open pit mining.
	Further work	The nature and scale of planned further work (e.g. tests for lateral extensions or depth extensions or large-scale step-out drilling).	Rosemont: Drilling will continue during 2017.
			Reichelts Find, King John, Old Peculiar & Tooheys Well:
			Infill and where appropriate, extensional drilling will continue in the September
			2017 quarter.
			McPhillamys:

Page 34

Quarterly Report to 30 June 2017

==> picture [124 x 37] intentionally omitted <==

	Criteria	JORC Code explanation	Commentary
			Sterilisation drilling for infrastructure will continue during the September 2017
			quarter.
		Diagrams clearly highlighting the areas of possible extensions,	See diagrams in main text
		including the main geological interpretations and future drilling
		areas, provided this information is not commercially sensitive.

Page 35

Quarterly Report to 30 June 2017

==> picture [125 x 37] intentionally omitted <==

APPENDIX 2

Hacks Bore Collar Location	Hacks Bore Collar Location	Hacks Bore Collar Location	Hacks Bore Collar Location	Hacks Bore Collar Location	Hacks Bore Collar Location	Hacks Bore Collar Location	Intersection >1.0ppm Au and >1g/t Au*m
Hole ID Y X Z Dip Azimuth Total Depth (m)							From(m) To (m) Interval (m) Au (ppm)
RRLHKBAC121	6922200	434860	486	‐60	271	105	No significant Intercept
RRLHKBAC122	6922200	435020	486	‐60	273	59	No significant Intercept
RRLHKBAC123	6922200	435180	486	‐60	268	113	No significant Intercept
RRLHKBAC124	6922200	435100	486	‐60	267	103	No significant Intercept
RRLHKBAC125	6921800	434600	486	‐60	268	44	No significant Intercept
RRLHKBAC126	6921800	434760	486	‐60	270	77	No significant Intercept
RRLHKBAC127	6921800	434920	486	‐60	270	49	No significant Intercept
RRLHKBAC128	6921800	434840	486	‐60	270	61	No significant Intercept
RRLHKBRC027	6922206	436758	549	‐60	270	98	No significant Intercept
RRLHKBRC028	6922199	436836	549	‐60	270	98	No significant Intercept
RRLHKBRC029	6922200	436920	549	‐60	270	98	No significant Intercept
RRLHKBRC030	6922203	437007	550	‐60	271	98	No significant Intercept
RRLHKBRC031	6922202	437036	549	‐60	270	103	No significant Intercept
RRLHKBRC032	6922201	437078	548	‐60	268	153	No significant Intercept
RRLHKBRC033	6922202	437160	545	‐60	270	123	No significant Intercept
RRLHKBRC034	6922199	437238	544	‐60	268	113	No significant Intercept
RRLHKBRC035	6922200	437319	545	‐60	267	128	No significant Intercept

Page 36

Quarterly Report to 30 June 2017

==> picture [124 x 37] intentionally omitted <==

King John Collar Location	King John Collar Location	King John Collar Location	King John Collar Location	Intersection >1.0ppm Au and >1g/t Au*m
Hole ID Y X Z Dip Azimuth Total Depth (m)				From m) To (m) Interval (m) Au (ppm)
RRLKJRC007 6911771 426158 494	‐60	247	118	No significant Intercept
RRLKJRC008 6911779 426176 493 ‐60 246 108 RRLKJRC008 RRLKJRC008 RRLKJRC008 RRLKJRC008				28 29 1 1.69 52 53 1 1.58 57 58 1 5.84 62 68 6 3.70 74 75 1 1.27
RRLKJRC009 6911808 426144 493	‐60	247	128	No significant Intercept
RRLKJRC010 6911813 426160 493	‐60	247	148	45 46 1 2.72
RRLKJRC011 6911821 426180 493	‐60	247	148	65 76 11 3.81
RRLKJRC012 6911828 426199 493 ‐60 248 148 RRLKJRC012 RRLKJRC012 RRLKJRC012 RRLKJRC012				59 61 2 1.64 68 74 6 2.56 89 90 1 1.71 93 99 6 24.83 143 144 1 1.06
RRLKJRC013 6911834 426218 493 ‐60 247 153 RRLKJRC013 RRLKJRC013 RRLKJRC013 RRLKJRC013				43 44 1 1.76 76 80 4 1.72 95 98 3 1.23 105 106 1 1.38 109 111 2 1.86
RRLKJRC014 6911841 426236 493	‐60	247	154	93 96 3 4.33 101 102 1 1.71
RRLKJRC014

Page 37

Quarterly Report to 30 June 2017

==> picture [124 x 37] intentionally omitted <==

RRLKJRC014	114 119 5 3.65
RRLKJRC015 6911785 426194 493 ‐60 247 133 RRLKJRC015	70 71 1 1.19 83 84 1 1.14
RRLKJRC016 6911793 426212 493 ‐60 248 143 RRLKJRC016	73 74 1 1.48 77 102 25 2.79
RRLKJRC017 6911800 426231 493 ‐60 248 143 RRLKJRC017 RRLKJRC017	99 103 4 1.80 107 110 3 5.04 115 116 1 6.65
RRLKJRC018 6911807 426251 493 ‐60 247 153 RRLKJRC018 RRLKJRC018	92 93 1 4.36 103 104 1 1.12 120 121 1 1.86

Page 38

Quarterly Report to 30 June 2017

==> picture [124 x 37] intentionally omitted <==

McPhillamys Collar Location	McPhillamys Collar Location	McPhillamys Collar Location	McPhillamys Collar Location	Intersection >1.0ppm Au and >1g/t Au*m
Hole ID Y X Z Dip Azimuth Total Depth (m)				From(m) To (m) Interval (m) Au (ppm)
RRLMPDD123 6292603 715818 943	‐75	303	360	9 9.5 0.5 1.10
RRLMPDD134 6292480 716071 956 ‐62 258 627.61 RRLMPDD134 RRLMPDD134 RRLMPDD134 RRLMPDD134 RRLMPDD134 RRLMPDD134 RRLMPDD134 RRLMPDD134				336 337 1 1.49 341 342 1 1.15 351 353 2 1.18 357 358 1 2.15 377 382 5 1.96 392 394 2 5.67 400 414 14 3.52 432 433 1 1.57 435 436 1 1.02
RRLMPDD134 RRLMPDD134 RRLMPDD134 RRLMPDD134				448 454 6 1.55 457 461 4 2.17 465 466 1 1.14 476 477 1 1.02
RRLMPDD135 6292426 715893 959 ‐65 258 248.2 RRLMPDD135 RRLMPDD135 RRLMPDD135 RRLMPDD135 RRLMPDD135				60 61 1 2.82 90 91 1 4.84 94 95 1 2.01 114 115 1 1.11 128 129 1 3.67 134 135 1 1.73 140 153 13 1.98
RRLMPDD135

Page 39

Quarterly Report to 30 June 2017

==> picture [124 x 37] intentionally omitted <==

RRLMPDD136 6292151 715886 977 ‐60 258 285 RRLMPDD136 RRLMPDD136 RRLMPDD136 RRLMPDD136 RRLMPDD136 RRLMPDD136	RRLMPDD136 6292151 715886 977 ‐60 258 285 RRLMPDD136 RRLMPDD136 RRLMPDD136 RRLMPDD136 RRLMPDD136 RRLMPDD136	RRLMPDD136 6292151 715886 977 ‐60 258 285 RRLMPDD136 RRLMPDD136 RRLMPDD136 RRLMPDD136 RRLMPDD136 RRLMPDD136	RRLMPDD136 6292151 715886 977 ‐60 258 285 RRLMPDD136 RRLMPDD136 RRLMPDD136 RRLMPDD136 RRLMPDD136 RRLMPDD136	5.5 6 0.5 1.03 42.5 43.5 1 5.83 61.5 62 0.5 1.30 100 101 1 1.03 118 119 1 1.73 179 180 1 1.52 184 185 1 9.37
RRLMPDD137 6292181 716092 950	‐75	119	185	No significant Intercept
RRLMPDD138 6292706 715853 939 ‐55 258 132.6 RRLMPDD138 RRLMPDD138				4 4.5 0.5 1.79 29.5 30.5 1 2.57 32.5 33 0.5 2.99
RRLMPDD139 6292109 715898 974 ‐60 258 446.9 RRLMPDD139 RRLMPDD139 RRLMPDD139 RRLMPDD139				2 3 1 1.67 22.5 23 0.5 1.18 84 90 6 2.61 106 107 1 2.28 115 120 5 1.90
RRLMPDD140 6292380 715914 965 ‐60 258 297.4 RRLMPDD140 RRLMPDD140 RRLMPDD140 RRLMPDD140 RRLMPDD140 RRLMPDD140 RRLMPDD140				20.5 21 0.5 1.13 45 53 8 1.59 65 66 1 2.17 71 72 1 2.11 76 80 4 3.32 95 96 1 1.34 100 103 3 1.28 129 133 4 1.79

Page 40

Quarterly Report to 30 June 2017

==> picture [124 x 37] intentionally omitted <==

	RRLMPDD140 RRLMPDD140 RRLMPDD140 RRLMPDD141 6292451 715948 962 ‐60 258 334.9 RRLMPDD141 RRLMPDD141 RRLMPDD141 RRLMPDD141 RRLMPDD141 RRLMPDD141 RRLMPDD142 6292554 716063 950 ‐60 258 457.1 RRLMPDD142 RRLMPDD142 RRLMPDD142 RRLMPDD142 RRLMPDD143 6292704 715897 939 ‐60 258 200.15 RRLMPDD143 RRLMPDD143 RRLMPDD143 RRLMPDD143 RRLMPDD144 6292606 715937 948 ‐60 258 267.19 RRLMPDD144 RRLMPDD144 RRLMPDD144	144 145 1 1.54 153 154 1 1.05 165 166 1 1.16
		51 52 1 3.36 137 138 1 1.05 141 142 1 1.42 156 157 1 2.31 165 166 1 1.26 187 188 1 1.20 198 217 19 1.53
		296 313 17 7.24 323 324 1 1.63 335 339 4 2.55 344 362 18 1.37 368 375 7 2.93
		6.5 7 0.5 1.39 9 11 2 1.58 13.5 14 0.5 1.37 88 89 1 1.49 104 105 1 1.11
		64 66 2 1.41 75 77 2 26.52 124 125 1 1.36 129 132 3 1.12

Page 41

Quarterly Report to 30 June 2017

==> picture [124 x 37] intentionally omitted <==

RRLMPDD144 RRLMPDD144 RRLMPDD144	145 146 1 1.01 153 157 4 1.89 174 175 1 4.36
RRLMPDD145 6292453 716067 958 ‐60 258 569.1 RRLMPDD145 RRLMPDD145 RRLMPDD145 RRLMPDD145 RRLMPDD145 RRLMPDD145 RRLMPDD145 RRLMPDD145 RRLMPDD145 RRLMPDD145 RRLMPDD145 RRLMPDD145 RRLMPDD145 RRLMPDD145 RRLMPDD145	153 165 12 3.00 168 169 1 1.30 205 206 1 1.30 311 316 5 1.79 320 321 1 1.60 327 329 2 2.58 335 337 2 1.33 348 371 23 1.91 387 388 1 1.57 392 399 7 3.34 402 403 1 1.63 428 430 2 1.96 436 438 2 1.57 446 448 2 4.24 451 455 4 1.80 459 460 1 3.73
RRLMPDD146 6292580 715991 949 ‐60 258 424.7 RRLMPDD146 RRLMPDD146 RRLMPDD146 RRLMPDD146	10 10.5 0.5 8.07 186 187 1 1.44 198 199 1 1.67 202 208 6 2.62 219 221 2 3.11 230 231 1 1.15
RRLMPDD146

Page 42

Quarterly Report to 30 June 2017

==> picture [124 x 37] intentionally omitted <==

RRLMPDD146 RRLMPDD146	255 256 1 2.89 260 261 1 1.00
RRLMPDD147 6292152 716016 962 ‐60 258 419.2 RRLMPDD147 RRLMPDD147 RRLMPDD147 RRLMPDD147 RRLMPDD147	98 99 1 4.61 212 213 1 1.58 238 239 1 1.32 261 262 1 1.08 330 331 1 1.06 366 367 1 2.34
RRLMPDD148 6292554 715886 952 ‐57 258 205.8 RRLMPDD148	11 11.5 0.5 1.27 74 75 1 1.21
RRLMPDD149 6292732 715868 936 ‐55 258 162.4 RRLMPDD149 RRLMPDD149 RRLMPDD149	7 7.5 0.5 1.65 13 13.5 0.5 1.77 24.5 25.5 1 1.71 67 68 1 1.29
RRLMPDD150 6292730 715912 936 ‐60 257 249.4 RRLMPDD150 RRLMPDD150 RRLMPDD150	98 99 1 1.12 121 123 2 1.99 134 135 1 1.06 156 157 1 2.06
RRLMPDD151 6292202 716046 958 ‐60 256 486.7 RRLMPDD151 RRLMPDD151 RRLMPDD151 RRLMPDD151	168 170 2 1.06 216 217 1 1.39 223 224 1 1.13 251 255 4 1.32 269 282 13 1.73 285 348 63 1.85
RRLMPDD151

Page 43

Quarterly Report to 30 June 2017

==> picture [124 x 37] intentionally omitted <==

RRLMPDD151 RRLMPDD151 RRLMPDD151 RRLMPDD151	RRLMPDD151 RRLMPDD151 RRLMPDD151 RRLMPDD151	RRLMPDD151 RRLMPDD151 RRLMPDD151 RRLMPDD151	RRLMPDD151 RRLMPDD151 RRLMPDD151 RRLMPDD151	357 358 1 1.09 360 364 4 1.12 369 370 1 1.23 375 390 15 1.90
RRLMPDD152 6292779 715673 921	‐60	258	260.6	No significant Intercept
RRLMPDD153 6292265 715802 964 ‐60 258 92.8 RRLMPDD153 RRLMPDD153 RRLMPDD153 RRLMPDD153				4.5 5 0.5 1.04 9.5 16 6.5 1.78 18.5 25.5 7 7.47 28 47 19 3.94 51 52 1 1.52
RRLMPDD154 6292630 715989 943 ‐60 258 447.4 RRLMPDD154 RRLMPDD154 RRLMPDD154 RRLMPDD154				203 206 3 1.33 222 223 1 1.20 233 239 6 1.14 254 261 7 1.59 272 274 2 2.08
RRLMPDD155 6292453 716127 954 ‐60 258 695.6 RRLMPDD155 RRLMPDD155 RRLMPDD155 RRLMPDD155 RRLMPDD155 RRLMPDD155 RRLMPDD155 RRLMPDD155				235 236 1 1.19 244 247 3 2.23 254 255 1 1.36 258 260 2 1.31 270 273 3 1.15 278 279 1 1.25 280 281 1 1.01 293 294 1 5.55 297 299 2 2.13

Page 44

Quarterly Report to 30 June 2017

==> picture [124 x 37] intentionally omitted <==

RRLMPDD155 RRLMPDD155 RRLMPDD155 RRLMPDD155 RRLMPDD155 RRLMPDD155 RRLMPDD155 RRLMPDD155 RRLMPDD155 RRLMPDD155 RRLMPDD155 RRLMPDD155 RRLMPDD155 RRLMPDD155 RRLMPDD155 RRLMPDD155 RRLMPDD155 RRLMPDD155 RRLMPDD155 RRLMPDD155	303 304 1 1.00 306 307 1 1.00 323 342 19 1.80 345 347 2 2.71 399 400 1 1.47 413 417 4 6.88 420 430 10 2.66 434 435 1 6.32 439 440 1 1.74 460 461 1 2.59 464 465 1 2.23 469 482 13 2.23 485 486 1 1.01 498 513 15 2.89 517 519 2 1.21 531 534 3 3.52 538 541 3 2.66 553 554 1 3.21 560 561 1 1.03 578 581 3 3.73
RRLMPDD156 6292177 715846 973 ‐55 258 193.5 RRLMPDD156 RRLMPDD156 RRLMPDD156	15.5 16 0.5 1.46 47 48 1 1.60 55 56 1 1.70 84 93 9 3.48 138 139 1 1.50
RRLMPDD156

Page 45

Quarterly Report to 30 June 2017

==> picture [124 x 37] intentionally omitted <==

RRLMPDD156	RRLMPDD156	RRLMPDD156	RRLMPDD156	165 166 1 2.99
RRLMPDD158 6292485 715760 942	‐60	258	102.3	No significant Intercept
RRLMPDD159 6292654 715870 944 ‐60 258 132.2 RRLMPDD159 RRLMPDD159 RRLMPDD159 RRLMPDD159				6.5 10.5 4 1.19 12.5 13 0.5 1.07 15.5 16 0.5 1.99 18.5 22 3.5 1.03 67 68 1 1.34
RRLMPDD160 6292252 715992 968 ‐60 258 442.9 RRLMPDD160 RRLMPDD160 RRLMPDD160 RRLMPDD160 RRLMPDD160 RRLMPDD160 RRLMPDD160 RRLMPDD160 RRLMPDD160 RRLMPDD160 RRLMPDD160 RRLMPDD160 RRLMPDD160 RRLMPDD160 RRLMPDD160 RRLMPDD160				31.5 32 0.5 1.07 54 55 1 1.23 117 118 1 1.36 127 129 2 2.71 139 140 1 1.58 143 145 2 1.26 149 151 2 1.97 159 165 6 1.51 228 229 1 4.46 241 247 6 2.02 251 259 8 6.23 264 265 1 1.40 268 269 1 1.30 299 301 2 1.19 317 321 4 1.72 325 333 8 4.70 349 350 1 2.60

Page 46

Quarterly Report to 30 June 2017

==> picture [124 x 37] intentionally omitted <==

RRLMPDD160	377 378 1 2.84
RRLMPDD161 6292192 715887 977 ‐60 258 251.9 RRLMPDD161 RRLMPDD161 RRLMPDD161 RRLMPDD161 RRLMPDD161 RRLMPDD161 RRLMPDD161 RRLMPDD161 RRLMPDD161 RRLMPDD161 RRLMPDD161 RRLMPDD161 RRLMPDD161 RRLMPDD161	16 17 1 1.34 21.5 22 0.5 1.43 26.5 27 0.5 1.12 38.5 39 0.5 1.02 42.5 43.5 1 3.23 49 49.5 0.5 1.06 50.5 51 0.5 1.03 73 75 2 2.94 118 119 1 1.03 129 143 14 3.20 147 148 1 1.20 152 156 4 1.24 161 169 8 5.82 173 174 1 1.63 177 178 1 1.10
RRLMPDD162 6292654 715896 944 ‐60 258 199.9 RRLMPDD162	3 3.5 0.5 1.07 94 95 1 2.15
RRLMPDD163 6292502 715874 953 ‐75 348 452.9 RRLMPDD163 RRLMPDD163 RRLMPDD163 RRLMPDD163 RRLMPDD163	132 133 1 1.22 153 159 6 1.31 257 292 35 4.43 295 306 11 1.42 311 312 1 1.92 315 317 2 1.25

Page 47

Quarterly Report to 30 June 2017

==> picture [124 x 37] intentionally omitted <==

RRLMPDD163	320 333 13 4.20
RRLMPDD163 RRLMPDD163 RRLMPDD163 RRLMPDD163 RRLMPDD163 RRLMPDD163 RRLMPDD163 RRLMPDD163	336 341 5 1.35 346 363 17 2.29 396 399 3 1.16 403 404 1 1.02 411 412 1 1.17 418 426 8 1.46 431 433 2 2.63 445 451 6 1.30
RRLMPDD164 6292655 715930 943 ‐60 258 249.5 RRLMPDD164	136 137 1 1.36 194 195 1 1.01
RRLMPDD165 6292179 715941 978 ‐60 258 296.3 RRLMPDD165 RRLMPDD165 RRLMPDD165 RRLMPDD165 RRLMPDD165 RRLMPDD165 RRLMPDD165 RRLMPDD165 RRLMPDD165 RRLMPDD165 RRLMPDD165 RRLMPDD165	17 18 1 2.11 44 45 1 1.29 62 63 1 1.05 64 65 1 1.07 80 81 1 1.90 184 200 16 3.29 205 207 2 1.45 212 213 1 1.13 217 218 1 1.08 227 237 10 1.78 246 252 6 1.62 255 257 2 1.22 262 263 1 2.81

Page 48

Quarterly Report to 30 June 2017

==> picture [124 x 37] intentionally omitted <==

RRLMPDD166 6292323 715892 968 ‐60 258 239.2 RRLMPDD166 RRLMPDD166 RRLMPDD166 RRLMPDD166 RRLMPDD166 RRLMPDD166 RRLMPDD166 RRLMPDD166	1.5 13.5 12 1.45 17.5 21.5 4 3.26 24 27 3 1.32 29.5 35.5 6 1.53 45 47 2 1.34 53 55 2 1.92 110 112 2 3.67 179 185 6 1.40 188 192 4 3.87
RRLMPDD167 6292655 715960 942 ‐60 258 351 RRLMPDD167 RRLMPDD167	137 140 3 1.19 194 196 2 2.16 217 218 1 2.79
RRLMPDD168 6292254 716071 957 ‐60 258 564.7 RRLMPDD168 RRLMPDD168 RRLMPDD168 RRLMPDD168 RRLMPDD168 RRLMPDD168 RRLMPDD168 RRLMPDD168 RRLMPDD168 RRLMPDD168	313 314 1 1.04 325 335 10 2.30 339 344 5 2.86 348 351 3 2.23 354 360 6 1.16 363 385 22 1.77 389 392 3 3.03 396 425 29 2.36 429 432 3 1.45 437 439 2 1.24 443 452 9 1.46 456 461 5 1.39
RRLMPDD168

Page 49

Quarterly Report to 30 June 2017

==> picture [124 x 37] intentionally omitted <==

RRLMPDD169 6292180 715505 941	‐65	78	199	66.5 67 0.5 1.01
RRLMPDD170 6292126 715932 976 ‐60 258 307.1 RRLMPDD170 RRLMPDD170 RRLMPDD170 RRLMPDD170 RRLMPDD170				123 124 1 2.25 128 129 1 1.28 138 146 8 3.49 242 250 8 1.11 286 287 1 1.09 288 289 1 1.02
RRLMPDD171 6292655 715995 941 ‐60 258 402.3 RRLMPDD171 RRLMPDD171 RRLMPDD171 RRLMPDD171				16.5 17 0.5 1.50 149 150 1 1.09 226 227 1 1.44 266 267 1 1.93 323 324 1 9.04
RRLMPDD172 6292355 715877 963 ‐60 258 207.9 RRLMPDD172 RRLMPDD172 RRLMPDD172 RRLMPDD172 RRLMPDD172 RRLMPDD172				1 1.5 0.5 1.51 7.5 32 24.5 1.76 45 53 8 1.72 57 58 1 1.24 67 71 4 1.51 74 75 1 1.22 137 138 1 1.28
RRLMPDD173 6292180 715505 941	‐60	258	207.8	No significant Intercept
RRLMPDD174 6292129 715981 968 ‐60 258 382.7 RRLMPDD174 RRLMPDD174				181 182 1 1.33 192 198 6 1.45 222 223 1 16.05 305 309 4 1.26
RRLMPDD174

Page 50

Quarterly Report to 30 June 2017

==> picture [124 x 37] intentionally omitted <==

RRLMPDD175 6292703 715958 937	‐60	258	320.8	No significant Intercept
RRLMPDD176 6292279 716002 967 ‐60 258 445.5 RRLMPDD176 RRLMPDD176 RRLMPDD176 RRLMPDD176 RRLMPDD176 RRLMPDD176 RRLMPDD176 RRLMPDD176 RRLMPDD176 RRLMPDD176 RRLMPDD176 RRLMPDD176 RRLMPDD176 RRLMPDD176 RRLMPDD176 RRLMPDD176 RRLMPDD176 RRLMPDD176 RRLMPDD176 RRLMPDD176 RRLMPDD176 RRLMPDD176				80 81 1 1.14 98 101 3 1.46 113 120 7 2.29 123 125 2 2.02 133 162 29 2.97 166 170 4 1.91 175 180 5 1.81 183 186 3 1.08 193 194 1 1.29 209 210 1 1.07 214 215 1 1.55 248 249 1 1.31 255 257 2 2.09 268 280 12 1.71 285 286 1 1.33 291 292 1 1.26 294 297 3 1.21 301 302 1 1.06 306 308 2 1.76 311 313 2 3.30 322 323 1 18.50 332 333 1 1.42 337 342 5 2.56 355 356 1 1.26
RRLMPDD176

Page 51

Quarterly Report to 30 June 2017

==> picture [124 x 37] intentionally omitted <==

RRLMPDD176 RRLMPDD176	RRLMPDD176 RRLMPDD176	RRLMPDD176 RRLMPDD176	RRLMPDD176 RRLMPDD176	360 362 2 1.08 388 392 4 1.71
RRLMPDD177 6292353 716037 963 ‐60 254 520.6 RRLMPDD177 RRLMPDD177 RRLMPDD177 RRLMPDD177 RRLMPDD177 RRLMPDD177 RRLMPDD177 RRLMPDD177 RRLMPDD177 RRLMPDD177 RRLMPDD177 RRLMPDD177 RRLMPDD177 RRLMPDD177 RRLMPDD177 RRLMPDD177 RRLMPDD177 RRLMPDD177 RRLMPDD177 RRLMPDD177				54 56 2 8.16 106 107 1 1.04 125 143 18 1.42 164 165 1 1.00 181 182 1 1.34 223 224 1 1.57 236 251 15 3.39 254 256 2 2.18 259 274 15 3.42 277 278 1 1.62 283 306 23 1.99 316 320 4 4.63 327 328 1 1.20 336 358 22 2.64 363 371 8 1.31 380 384 4 1.11 388 389 1 1.45 392 403 11 4.91 406 407 1 1.20 411 425 14 1.96 429 432 3 3.19
RRLMPDD178 6292136 715840 973	‐60	258	144	17.5 20.5 3 1.31 48.5 49 0.5 1.31
RRLMPDD178

Page 52

Quarterly Report to 30 June 2017

==> picture [124 x 37] intentionally omitted <==

RRLMPDD179 6292199 715765 963	‐60	258	56.7	No significant Intercept
RRLMPDD180 6292605 715904 949 ‐60 258 222.6 RRLMPDD180 RRLMPDD180 RRLMPDD180 RRLMPDD180 RRLMPDD180				10 13.5 3.5 1.14 16 16.5 0.5 1.01 104 109 5 1.33 143 144 1 1.80 151 155 4 1.07 177 178 1 2.39
RRLMPDD181 6292290 715817 964 ‐50 258 80.2 RRLMPDD181 RRLMPDD181 RRLMPDD181 RRLMPDD181 RRLMPDD181 RRLMPDD181 RRLMPDD181 RRLMPDD181 RRLMPDD181 RRLMPDD181 RRLMPDD181 RRLMPDD181				2 2.5 0.5 6.48 7.5 8.5 1 1.61 12.5 13.5 1 2.52 15.35 16 0.65 1.81 44.88 45.18 0.3 1.43 46 47 1 1.43 47.3 49.5 2.2 1.50 52 53.5 1.5 3.77 57 58.14 1.14 2.85 58.5 58.6 0.1 5.03 59.5 64 4.5 6.58 65.45 65.8 0.35 1.62 66.3 68 1.7 1.63
RRLMPDD182 6291995 715967 954 ‐60 258 221.6 RRLMPDD182 RRLMPDD182				40.5 42 1.5 2.40 50 51 1 1.21 58 67 9 2.31
RRLMPDD183 6292262 715854 970	‐60	258	195.1	2.5 3 0.5 1.05

Page 53

Quarterly Report to 30 June 2017

==> picture [124 x 37] intentionally omitted <==

RRLMPDD183 RRLMPDD183 RRLMPDD183 RRLMPDD183 RRLMPDD183 RRLMPDD183 RRLMPDD183 RRLMPDD183	9 10 1 1.03 21.5 22.5 1 1.42 51 53 2 2.13 65 68 3 1.73 81 99 18 2.29 101 102 1 1.87 105 122 17 1.63 126 131 5 2.81
RRLMPDD184 6292606 716056 946 ‐60 258 597.5 RRLMPDD184 RRLMPDD184 RRLMPDD184	322 338 16 3.81 341 384 43 2.96 387 388 1 1.55 404 420 16 1.72
RRLMPDD185 6292204 716006 965 ‐60 258 438.9 RRLMPDD185 RRLMPDD185 RRLMPDD185 RRLMPDD185 RRLMPDD185 RRLMPDD185 RRLMPDD185 RRLMPDD185 RRLMPDD185 RRLMPDD185	88 90 2 1.22 115 116 1 1.78 139 140 1 3.40 233 234 1 1.43 237 277 40 3.60 280 285 5 1.54 304 305 1 1.10 310 315 5 1.77 322 330 8 4.11 333 338 5 1.55 347 348 1 1.37 359 360 1 1.22
RRLMPDD185

Page 54

Quarterly Report to 30 June 2017

==> picture [124 x 37] intentionally omitted <==

RRLMPDD186 6292353 716095 955	‐60	258	538.6	182 183 1 1.17
RRLMPDD186 RRLMPDD186 RRLMPDD186 RRLMPDD186 RRLMPDD186 RRLMPDD186 RRLMPDD186 RRLMPDD186 RRLMPDD186 RRLMPDD186 RRLMPDD186 RRLMPDD186 RRLMPDD186 RRLMPDD186 RRLMPDD186 RRLMPDD186 RRLMPDD186 RRLMPDD186 RRLMPDD186 RRLMPDD186 RRLMPDD186				206 207 1 3.73 213 219 6 1.81 239 240 1 1.34 248 249 1 2.15 254 255 1 1.98 261 268 7 2.17 272 274 2 1.20 279 306 27 2.67 311 312 1 1.08 315 350 35 3.35 356 361 5 1.69 364 366 2 2.23 369 376 7 1.34 380 382 2 4.56 385 387 2 1.91 416 418 2 2.57 421 422 1 1.24 453 454 1 1.19 458 459 1 1.06 478 479 1 1.02 483 508 25 1.34
RRLMPRC082 6292680 715849 940 ‐60 258 85 RRLMPRC082				6 8 2 1.60 22 23 1 1.79 28 29 1 1.26
RRLMPRC082

Page 55

Quarterly Report to 30 June 2017

==> picture [124 x 37] intentionally omitted <==

RRLMPRC082	RRLMPRC082	RRLMPRC082	RRLMPRC082	34 35 1 1.01
RRLMPRC083 6292408 715860 957 ‐60 258 162 RRLMPRC083 RRLMPRC083 RRLMPRC083				10 12 2 1.78 51 52 1 1.51 65 67 2 1.10 74 75 1 1.85
RRLMPRC084 6292430 715760 946	‐60	258	72	No significant Intercept
RRLMPRC085 6292730 716096 940 ‐60 258 246 RRLMPRC085				232 233 1 1.20 240 241 1 2.21
RRLMPRC086 6292367 716547 950	‐60	258	120	No significant Intercept
RRLMPRC087 6292380 716650 950	‐60	258	82	No significant Intercept
RRLMPRC088 6292680 715600 950 ‐60 258 100 RRLMPRC088				33 35 2 1.54 48 49 1 1.02
RRLMPRC089 6292780 715510 950 ‐60 258 100 RRLMPRC089 RRLMPRC089 RRLMPRC089 RRLMPRC089 RRLMPRC089				4 5 1 1.66 17 18 1 1.13 22 23 1 1.82 47 48 1 1.44 54 55 1 2.22 67 68 1 1.27
RRLMPRC090 6292880 715540 950	‐60	258	72	4 5 1 2.49
RRLMPRC091 6292580 716400 950	‐60	258	84	41 44 3 1.56
RRLMPRC092 6292580 716700 950	‐60	258	48	No significant Intercept
RRLMPRC093 6292580 716600 950	‐60	258	150	No significant Intercept
RRLMPRC094 6292580 716500 950	‐60	258	96	9 10 1 1.77

Page 56

Quarterly Report to 30 June 2017

==> picture [124 x 37] intentionally omitted <==

Old Peculiar Collar Location	Old Peculiar Collar Location	Old Peculiar Collar Location	Old Peculiar Collar Location	Intersection >1.0ppm Au and >1g/t Au*m
Hole ID X Y Z Dip Azimuth Total Depth (m)				From(m) To (m) Interval (m) Au (ppm)
RRLOPRC008 6907419 438706 518	‐60	255	160	46 47 1 1.18
RRLOPRC009 6907463 438716 519	‐60	254	154	61 62 1 1.55
RRLOPRC010 6907540 438698 517 ‐60 255 150 RRLOPRC010 RRLOPRC010 RRLOPRC010 RRLOPRC010				49 50 1 1.33 57 58 1 3.02 64 66 2 3.61 98 101 3 2.49 108 109 1 1.17 42 43 1 1.33 54 57 3 1.45 77 79 2 2.17 84 87 3 2.13 91 99 8 2.77 67 69 2 1.31 107 114 7 2.02 123 124 1 6.66
RRLOPRC011 6907573 438670 516 ‐60 254 120 RRLOPRC011 RRLOPRC011 RRLOPRC011 RRLOPRC011
RRLOPRC012 6907622 438689 516 ‐60 251 150 RRLOPRC012 RRLOPRC012
RRLOPRC013 6907651 438651 515 ‐60 256 114 RRLOPRC013 RRLOPRC013 RRLOPRC013 RRLOPRC013				50 52 2 3.81 57 62 5 1.21 68 69 1 1.75 77 78 1 1.06 81 82 1 2.18
RRLOPRC014 6907661 438690 515 ‐60 255 144				106 108 2 3.50

Page 57

Quarterly Report to 30 June 2017

==> picture [124 x 37] intentionally omitted <==

RRLOPRC014	RRLOPRC014	RRLOPRC014	RRLOPRC014	121 122 1 1.07
Reichelt's Find Collar Location				Intersection >1.0ppm Au and >1g/t Au*m
Hole ID X Y Z Dip Azimuth Total Depth (m)				From(m) To (m) Interval (m) Au (ppm)
RRLREIAC001 6902273 438245 520	‐60	271	28	No significant Intercept
RRLREIAC002 6902273 438285 520	‐60	269	36	No significant Intercept
RRLREIAC003 6902273 438325 520	‐60	269	37	No significant Intercept
RRLREIAC004 6902270 438370 520	‐60	274	98	No significant Intercept
RRLREIAC005 6902520 438326 520	‐60	269	38	16 20 4 2.03
RRLREIAC006 6902520 438366 520	‐60	268	66	36 40 4 3.81
RRLREIAC007 6902520 438400 520	‐60	265	116	No significant Intercept
RRLREIAC008 6902640 438363 520	‐60	274	43	16 20 4 1.24
RRLREIAC009 6902640 438402 520	‐60	268	95	No significant Intercept
RRLREIAC010 6902640 438445 520	‐60	260	121	No significant Intercept
RRLREIAC011 6902900 438431 520	‐60	269	144	No significant Intercept
RRLREIAC012 6902900 438373 521	‐60	0	58	No significant Intercept
RRLREIAC013 6902900 438453 522	‐60	0	61	No significant Intercept
RRLREIAC014 6902900 438493 523	‐60	0	106	No significant Intercept
RRLREIAC015 6903300 438420 524	‐60	0	54	No significant Intercept
RRLREIAC016 6903300 438460 525	‐60	0	127	No significant Intercept
RRLREIAC017 6903300 438500 520	‐60	265	150	No significant Intercept
RRLREIAC018 6903580 438400 520	‐60	273	145	No significant Intercept
RRLREIAC019 6903580 438440 520	‐60	265	123	No significant Intercept

Page 58

Quarterly Report to 30 June 2017

==> picture [124 x 37] intentionally omitted <==

RRLREIAC020 6903580 438480 520	‐60	269	149	No significant Intercept
RRLREIAC021 6902273 438324 520	‐60	270	74	36 40 4 1.49
RRLREIAC022 6901005 438169 520	‐60	270	135	0 4 4 1.65
RRLREIAC023 6901005 438209 520	‐60	270	58	No significant Intercept
RRLREIAC024 6901089 438171 520	‐60	273	114	12 16 4 1.82
RRLREIRC001 6901289 438142 520	‐60	270	82	No significant Intercept
RRLREIRC002 6901331 438154 521	‐60	270	118	71 73 2 1.74
RRLREIRC003 6901330 438175 522 ‐60 270 142 RRLREIRC003 RRLREIRC003 RRLREIRC003				59 60 1 1.14 92 93 1 1.66 99 105 6 1.10 110 111 1 5.46
RRLREIRC004 6901348 438144 521 ‐58 270 112 RRLREIRC004				44 48 4 1.78 63 64 1 1.35
RRLREIRC005 6901348 438169 521 ‐60 270 136 RRLREIRC005 RRLREIRC005				52 53 1 1.09 77 81 4 1.14 117 119 2 1.40
RRLREIRC006 6901388 438162 521 ‐60 271 132 RRLREIRC006				74 75 1 1.78 103 107 4 1.57
RRLREIRC007 6901379 438167 521 ‐60 269 140 RRLREIRC007				87 91 4 3.75 96 111 15 3.55
RRLREIRC008 6901431 438170 522 ‐50 270 140 RRLREIRC008 RRLREIRC008				82 83 1 7.66 87 88 1 7.82 109 110 1 6.06
RRLREIRC009 6901468 438185 523	‐58	270	172	No significant Intercept

Page 59

Quarterly Report to 30 June 2017

==> picture [124 x 37] intentionally omitted <==

RRLREIRC010 6901488 438189 523	‐50	270	160	80 81 1 1.10
RRLREIRC011 6901523 438188 524 ‐50 271 154 RRLREIRC011 RRLREIRC011				93 94 1 1.52 112 115 3 6.71 120 122 2 1.24
RRLREIRC012 6901552 438193 525	‐60	270	160	119 121 2 3.34
RRLREIRC013 6901550 438217 524 ‐62 270 184 RRLREIRC013				69 70 1 1.05 94 95 1 1.58
RRLREIRC014 6901570 438208 525 ‐60 270 172 RRLREIRC014				136 137 1 1.51 139 140 1 1.68
RRLREIRC015 6901587 438212 526 ‐57 270 160 RRLREIRC015				134 136 2 1.86 139 142 3 2.55
RRLREIRC016 6901632 438243 526	‐50	270	184	152 153 1 3.70
RRLREIRC017 6901650 438257 527 ‐50 271 196 RRLREIRC017				150 151 1 1.79 185 186 1 1.38
RRLREIRC018 6901669 438276 527 ‐50 270 214 RRLREIRC018				153 155 2 4.78 188 191 3 3.57
RRLREIRC019 6901938 438276 528	‐60	270	154	96 103 7 3.03
RRLREIRC020 6901886 438201 529	‐60	270	123	No significant Intercept
RRLREIRC021 6901869 438228 529	‐60	270	120	42 44 2 5.74
RRLREIRC022 6901883 438259 527 ‐60 270 160 RRLREIRC022				87 88 1 2.05 104 106 2 4.10
RRLREIRC023 6901910 438239 527	‐60	270	110	No significant Intercept
RRLREIRC024 6901974 438082 532	‐60	270	82	No significant Intercept
RRLREIRC025 6901972 438121 531	‐60	269	82	No significant Intercept

Page 60

Quarterly Report to 30 June 2017

==> picture [124 x 37] intentionally omitted <==

RRLREIRC026 6901971 438159 530	‐60	270	82	No significant Intercept
RRLREIRC027 6901969 438200 528	‐60	269	64	No significant Intercept
RRLREIRC028 6901969 438223 529 ‐60 268 112 RRLREIRC028 RRLREIRC028				4 7 3 1.49 15 16 1 2.06 78 79 1 1.26
RRLREIRC029 6901967 438279 529	‐60	270	130	61 80 19 3.06
RRLREIRC030 6902010 438216 529	‐60	269	106	No significant Intercept
RRLREIRC031 6902007 438256 531 ‐60 270 88 RRLREIRC031				20 21 1 1.69 24 25 1 1.26
RRLREIRC032 6902008 438302 529	‐60	271	148	82 88 6 6.44
RRLREIRC033 6901691 438286 527 ‐51 270 220 RRLREIRC033				159 164 5 5.26 196 202 6 4.10
RRLREIRC034 6901749 438311 527 ‐60 270 240 RRLREIRC034 RRLREIRC034 RRLREIRC034				36 37 1 1.15 168 171 3 1.30 174 180 6 2.81 225 226 1 1.64
RRLREIRC035 6901510 438191 523	‐55	270	159	No significant Intercept
RRLREIRC036 6901710 438286 527 ‐50 269 201 RRLREIRC036 RRLREIRC036				141 146 5 1.53 149 150 1 1.30 181 183 2 7.24
RRLREIRC037 6901729 438291 527 ‐50 271 201 RRLREIRC037				135 138 3 3.95 143 146 3 2.26
RRLREIRC038 6901749 438291 527 ‐50 271 219 RRLREIRC038				36 37 1 1.13 129 133 4 5.71

Page 61

Quarterly Report to 30 June 2017

==> picture [124 x 37] intentionally omitted <==

RRLREIRC038 RRLREIRC038	RRLREIRC038 RRLREIRC038	RRLREIRC038 RRLREIRC038	RRLREIRC038 RRLREIRC038	152 153 1 12.00 192 193 1 2.58
RRLREIRC039 6901772 438288 528 ‐50 269 219 RRLREIRC039				149 152 3 1.81 185 186 1 4.70
RRLREIRC040 6901796 438286 527 ‐50 271 189 RRLREIRC040				130 131 1 1.62 166 167 1 3.86
RRLREIRC041 6901796 438287 527 ‐60 271 207 RRLREIRC041				150 153 3 1.96 200 201 1 2.18
RRLREIRC042 6901788 438311 527 ‐60 268 219 RRLREIRC042				162 163 1 1.13 173 178 5 4.07
RRLREIRC050 6902088 438087 534	‐60	267	44	No significant Intercept
RRLREIRC087 6901378 438178 521 ‐63 268 162 RRLREIRC087 RRLREIRC087 RRLREIRC087				93 94 1 1.04 107 109 2 7.42 112 117 5 2.48 121 122 1 1.45
RRLREIRC088 6901330 438193 523	‐63	268	162	No significant Intercept
RRLREIRC089 6901348 438177 521	‐63	270	162	No significant Intercept

Page 62

Quarterly Report to 30 June 2017

==> picture [124 x 37] intentionally omitted <==

Rosemont Collar Location	Intersection >1.0ppm Au and >1g/t Au*m
Hole ID X Y Z Dip Azimuth Total Depth (m)	From(m) To (m) Interval (m) Au (ppm)
RRLRMRC557 6919043 429057 503 ‐60 254 472 RRLRMRC557 RRLRMRC557	293 298 5 1.50 334 335 1 1.37 351 362 11 5.01
RRLRMRC558 6918999 429053 502 ‐60 254 405 RRLRMRC558 RRLRMRC558	269 273 4 1.37 286 287 1 1.28 320 323 3 1.47
RRLRMRC559 6921471 427575 506 ‐60 75 63	40 42 2 2.09
RRLRMRC560 6921470 427569 506 ‐80 73 105 RRLRMRC560	50 52 2 2.24 70 85 15 5.09
RRLRMRC562 6918945 429033 502 ‐60 254 292 RRLRMRC562 RRLRMRC562	160 161 1 1.82 179 208 29 1.18 222 225 3 12.20
RRLRMRC563 6918949 429072 502 ‐60 254 385 RRLRMRC563 RRLRMRC563	280 311 31 2.43 316 317 1 2.83 322 324 2 1.04
RRLRMRC564 6919041 428957 503 ‐60 254 184	152 173 21 2.58
RRLRMRC565 6919061 428983 503 ‐60 254 350 RRLRMRC565 RRLRMRC565 RRLRMRC565	213 223 10 1.52 232 234 2 1.25 237 247 10 1.12 258 260 2 7.15
RRLRMRC570 6919042 428988 503 ‐60 254 334	204 216 12 1.09

Page 63

Quarterly Report to 30 June 2017

==> picture [124 x 37] intentionally omitted <==

RRLRMRC570	218 225 7 1.18
RRLRMRC573 6918946 429050 502 ‐60 253 300 RRLRMRC573 RRLRMRC573 RRLRMRC573	247 248 1 1.13 265 270 5 18.84 291 293 2 1.24 299 300 1 2.59
RRLRMRC574 6921376 427530 506 ‐50 102 200 RRLRMRC574 RRLRMRC574	6 7 1 1.34 150 154 4 24.19 172 185 13 3.00
RRLRMRC575 6921340 427508 506 ‐60 75 255	No significant Intercept
RRLRMRC576 6921425 427556 506 ‐60 76 129 RRLRMRC576 RRLRMRC576 RRLRMRC576 RRLRMRC576 RRLRMRC576	12 13 1 1.17 53 54 1 15.90 91 92 1 1.70 103 105 2 1.36 109 111 2 2.17 114 115 1 3.49
RRLRMRC577 6920808 427877 507 ‐60 73 258	No significant Intercept
RRLRMRC577 6920808 427877 507 ‐60 73 258 RRLRMRC577 RRLRMRC577	215 216 1 1.11 222 224 2 2.18 229 230 1 1.14
RRLRMRC578 6921367 427652 473 ‐90 142 114 RRLRMRC578	9 15 6 3.95 19 21 2 1.55
RRLRMRC579 6919711 428631 415 ‐80 257 376 RRLRMRC579	134 139 5 4.68 146 150 4 2.81 177 184 7 2.95
RRLRMRC579

Page 64

Quarterly Report to 30 June 2017

==> picture [124 x 37] intentionally omitted <==

RRLRMRC579 RRLRMRC579 RRLRMRC579 RRLRMRC579 RRLRMRC579	191 192 1 1.25 205 206 1 1.00 211 218 7 14.35 319 321 2 9.84 355 356 1 3.38
RRLRMRC580 6920828 427817 507 ‐63 74 321	No significant Intercept
RRLRMRC590 6918899 429032 502 ‐57 254 184 RRLRMRC590 RRLRMRC590 RRLRMRC590	148 149 1 1.02 154 155 1 1.19 164 167 3 4.91 174 177 3 15.59
RRLRMRC591 6918908 429058 502 ‐60 254 357 RRLRMRC591 RRLRMRC591 RRLRMRC591 RRLRMRC591 RRLRMRC591 RRLRMRC591	216 247 31 2.70 252 253 1 4.08 258 261 3 1.53 277 280 3 2.45 286 287 1 1.40 291 292 1 2.54 330 331 1 1.24
RRLRMRC592 6918934 429026 502 ‐60 253 291 RRLRMRC592 RRLRMRC592	157 161 4 1.20 165 171 6 2.48 174 181 7 3.13
RRLRMRC593 6919020 429048 503 ‐60 253 309 RRLRMRC593 RRLRMRC593	276 285 9 1.99 289 294 5 2.25 298 299 1 1.03
RRLRMRC594 6920956 428035 508 ‐50 264 272	183 188 5 1.41

Page 65

Quarterly Report to 30 June 2017

==> picture [124 x 37] intentionally omitted <==

RRLRMRC595 6919944 428423 415 ‐81 76 290 RRLRMRC595 RRLRMRC595 RRLRMRC595 RRLRMRC595	159 160 1 1.33 235 236 1 1.00 239 253 14 2.14 258 260 2 1.78 265 277 12 3.07
RRLRMRC596 6919936 428391 416 ‐79 74 313 RRLRMRC596 RRLRMRC596	270 278 8 1.38 281 284 3 1.53 287 288 1 6.41
RRLRMRC597 6919969 428416 415 ‐55 74 191 RRLRMRC597 RRLRMRC597	147 149 2 3.01 152 157 5 3.33 168 169 1 1.31
RRLRMRC598 6920022 428401 415 ‐76 78 261 RRLRMRC598 RRLRMRC598 RRLRMRC598 RRLRMRC598 RRLRMRC598 RRLRMRC598	187 188 1 1.06 191 196 5 10.25 209 210 1 3.32 216 218 2 2.58 221 222 1 2.56 228 229 1 1.74 231 232 1 1.15
RRLRMRC599 6920022 428401 415 ‐69.2 75 227 RRLRMRC599 RRLRMRC599 RRLRMRC599 RRLRMRC599 RRLRMRC599	158 159 1 1.32 170 171 1 3.59 174 180 6 28.70 192 194 2 35.50 198 200 2 5.66 204 205 1 1.76

Page 66

Quarterly Report to 30 June 2017

==> picture [124 x 37] intentionally omitted <==

RRLRMRC600 6921359 427628 470 ‐90 0 153 RRLRMRC600 RRLRMRC600 RRLRMRC600 RRLRMRC600 RRLRMRC600 RRLRMRC600 RRLRMRC600 RRLRMRC600	2 4 2 4.21 10 11 1 1.00 28 30 2 2.56 44 46 2 1.35 58 64 6 1.06 71 75 4 4.05 89 91 2 1.71 103 115 12 2.26 121 123 2 1.65
RRLRMRC601 6921353 427612 469 ‐90 0 163 RRLRMRC601 RRLRMRC601 RRLRMRC601	9 11 2 16.45 16 19 3 1.94 122 123 1 3.06 153 154 1 1.01
RRLRMRC602 6921040 427817 427 ‐72 74 115	83 85 2 6.65
RRLRMRC603 6920804 427906 507 ‐60 74 230 RRLRMRC603	190 191 1 2.37 202 203 1 1.41
RRLRMRC604 6919906 428434 416 ‐70.4 74 245 RRLRMRC604 RRLRMRC604 RRLRMRC604 RRLRMRC604 RRLRMRC604	135 136 1 59.70 145 146 1 4.64 160 161 1 3.92 175 186 11 2.14 193 194 1 1.10 207 209 2 3.24
RRLRMRC605 6919906 428433 416 ‐78.9 74 263	207 208 1 9.76 212 219 7 9.83
RRLRMRC605

Page 67

Quarterly Report to 30 June 2017

==> picture [124 x 37] intentionally omitted <==

RRLRMRC605 RRLRMRC605 RRLRMRC605	227 235 8 1.33 238 239 1 1.21 255 256 1 1.86
RRLRMRC606 6920144 428376 421 ‐79 82 332 RRLRMRC606 RRLRMRC606 RRLRMRC606 RRLRMRC606 RRLRMRC606 RRLRMRC606	193 195 2 10.46 201 202 1 68.60 229 230 1 1.85 236 244 8 1.44 249 252 3 3.52 255 256 1 1.07 262 267 5 11.16
RRLRMRC607 6920144 428376 420 ‐83 74 42	No significant Intercept
RRLRMRC608 6920129 428380 420 ‐77 74 331 RRLRMRC608 RRLRMRC608 RRLRMRC608 RRLRMRC608 RRLRMRC608 RRLRMRC608 RRLRMRC608	151 152 1 2.26 179 182 3 4.91 224 225 1 1.98 228 233 5 2.26 239 240 1 2.15 245 246 1 5.52 252 256 4 1.08 260 261 1 1.31
RRLRMRC609 6921405 427543 506 ‐60 77 160 RRLRMRC609 RRLRMRC609 RRLRMRC609	52 53 1 26.30 122 124 2 4.22 130 131 1 1.58 141 144 3 1.58
RRLRMRC610 6920060 428390 415 ‐72 73 252	177 178 1 1.74

Page 68

Quarterly Report to 30 June 2017

==> picture [124 x 37] intentionally omitted <==

RRLRMRC610 RRLRMRC610 RRLRMRC610 RRLRMRC610	190 191 1 2.18 194 211 17 37.09 214 215 1 2.30 222 225 3 1.24
RRLRMRC611 6920057 428391 415 ‐78 74 306 RRLRMRC611 RRLRMRC611 RRLRMRC611 RRLRMRC611 RRLRMRC611 RRLRMRC611 RRLRMRC611	216 222 6 16.57 230 231 1 1.11 238 239 1 1.80 242 243 1 1.16 248 255 7 1.54 258 259 1 2.50 281 282 1 3.96 288 291 3 1.04
RRLRMRC612 6920057 428391 415 ‐82 74 300 RRLRMRC612	271 281 10 14.60 284 291 7 33.86
RRLRMRC613 6920103 428398 415 ‐72 74 241 RRLRMRC613 RRLRMRC613 RRLRMRC613 RRLRMRC613	114 116 2 4.15 119 120 1 1.26 177 181 4 3.49 184 185 1 7.15 208 209 1 1.50
RRLRMRC614 6920129 428381 420 ‐83 74 317	287 295 8 16.55
RRLRMRC615 6920041 428396 415 ‐64.2 76 227 RRLRMRC615 RRLRMRC615	136 137 1 2.41 165 172 7 1.19 175 188 13 1.53 195 204 9 2.64
RRLRMRC615

Page 69

Quarterly Report to 30 June 2017

==> picture [124 x 37] intentionally omitted <==

RRLRMRC616 6920079 428385 415 ‐68 75 243 RRLRMRC616 RRLRMRC616	176 180 4 6.21 208 209 1 1.17 212 218 6 1.10
RRLRMRC617 6919938 428391 416 ‐81 73.6 32	No significant Intercept
RRLRMRC618 6919938 428390 416 ‐81 73 383 RRLRMRC618	344 345 1 1.24 349 353 4 8.38
RRLRMRC619 6920960 428037 508 ‐57 266 404 RRLRMRC619 RRLRMRC619 RRLRMRC619 RRLRMRC619 RRLRMRC619	196 197 1 1.79 217 218 1 1.42 222 223 1 1.52 235 236 1 17.80 302 303 1 1.54 318 322 4 53.37
RRLRMRC620 6919672 428643 410 ‐79 251 6	No significant Intercept
RRLRMRC621 6919600 428680 410 ‐76 255 407 RRLRMRC621 RRLRMRC621 RRLRMRC621 RRLRMRC621 RRLRMRC621 RRLRMRC621 RRLRMRC621 RRLRMRC621 RRLRMRC621	75 77 2 1.99 87 88 1 1.67 103 105 2 1.97 127 128 1 2.86 138 142 4 5.49 158 159 1 6.78 162 164 2 2.50 174 179 5 2.29 187 188 1 1.38 195 196 1 7.23 212 215 3 4.62
RRLRMRC621

Page 70

Quarterly Report to 30 June 2017

==> picture [124 x 37] intentionally omitted <==

RRLRMRC621 RRLRMRC621 RRLRMRC621 RRLRMRC621	231 238 7 7.62 241 243 2 1.41 354 355 1 1.27 398 399 1 5.28
RRLRMRC622 6919600 428681 410 ‐80 255 17	No significant Intercept
RRLRMRC623 6919598 428683 410 ‐80 255 385 RRLRMRC623 RRLRMRC623 RRLRMRC623 RRLRMRC623 RRLRMRC623 RRLRMRC623 RRLRMRC623 RRLRMRC623 RRLRMRC623 RRLRMRC623 RRLRMRC623 RRLRMRC623 RRLRMRC623 RRLRMRC623 RRLRMRC623 RRLRMRC623	102 103 1 3.42 111 125 14 1.44 143 145 2 2.42 155 161 6 1.22 172 176 4 1.14 183 190 7 3.07 193 194 1 1.44 197 200 3 7.66 206 208 2 1.96 212 214 2 4.49 221 224 3 3.23 245 247 2 1.55 249 250 1 1.28 255 256 1 3.97 278 279 1 1.02 284 291 7 6.19 311 324 13 2.65 383 385 2 2.73
RRLRMRC623

Page 71

Quarterly Report to 30 June 2017

==> picture [124 x 37] intentionally omitted <==

Tooheys Collar Location	Tooheys Collar Location	Tooheys Collar Location	Tooheys Collar Location	Tooheys Collar Location	Intersection >1.0ppm Au and >1g/t Au*m
Hole ID	X Y Z Dip Azimuth Total Depth (m)				From(m) To (m) Interval (m) Au (ppm)
RRLTWRC375	6909039 437742 509	‐60	269	138	61 63 2 2.47
RRLTWRC375					97 100 3 1.18
RRLTWRC376	6909339 437760 506 ‐60 270 148				0 1 1 1.45
RRLTWRC377	6909397 437936 509 ‐60 270 113				No significant Intercept
RRLTWRC414	6908859 437801 509 ‐60 269 118				71 72 1 1.00
RRLTWRC414 RRLTWRC414					106 107 1 9.92 111 113 2 10.70
RRLTWRC415	6908777 437978 508 ‐60 270 118				27 28 1 10.50
RRLTWRC416	6908699 437760 508 ‐60 270 118				No significant Intercept
RRLTWRC417	6908698 437839 508 ‐60 270 118				No significant Intercept
RRLTWRC418	6908697 437978 507 ‐60 270 118				102 103 1 4.42
RRLTWRC418					115 116 1 2.26
RRLTWRC419	6908538 437897 506 ‐60 270 83				No significant Intercept
RRLTWRC422	6909279 437716 506 ‐60 268 98				79 80 1 1.47
RRLTWRC422					82 83 1 1.01
RRLTWRC424	6908379 437920 505 ‐60 270 83				No significant Intercept
RRLTWRC425	6908378 437979 506 ‐60 270 118				No significant Intercept
RRLTWRC426	6908377 438060 506 ‐60 269 83				No significant Intercept
RRLTWRC427	6908378 438140 507 ‐60 270 113				No significant Intercept
RRLTWRC428	6908379 438219 508 ‐60 270 118				No significant Intercept

Page 72

Quarterly Report to 30 June 2017

==> picture [124 x 37] intentionally omitted <==

RRLTWRC429 6909397 437918 509 ‐60 271 163	49 53 4 2.27
RRLTWRC429 RRLTWRC429 RRLTWRC429	69 70 1 3.67 75 76 1 1.12 131 132 1 1.67
RRLTWRC436 6909460 437735 507 ‐60 271 118	54 55 1 1.12
RRLTWRC437 6909560 437820 508 ‐60 268 70	51 52 1 6.93
RRLTWRC438 6909560 437859 508 ‐60 268 94	54 57 3 1.12
RRLTWRC439 6909698 437901 508 ‐60 268 112	62 63 1 1.24
RRLTWRC439	71 73 2 1.59
RRLTWRC440 6909904 437536 503 ‐60 269 118	No significant Intercept
RRLTWRC441 6909902 437615 504 ‐60 271 88	No significant Intercept
RRLTWRC442 6909902 437720 505 ‐60 269 94	No significant Intercept
RRLTWRC443 6909898 437918 505 ‐60 269 88	No significant Intercept
RRLTWRC444 6909824 437543 502 ‐60 269 94	No significant Intercept
RRLTWRC445 6909823 437618 503 ‐60 268 82	No significant Intercept
RRLTWRC446 6909823 437718 505 ‐60 270 100	40 42 2 2.47
RRLTWRC447 6909821 437915 506 ‐60 270 82	No significant Intercept
RRLTWRC448 6910058 437458 502 ‐60 269 82	No significant Intercept
RRLTWRC449 6910059 437517 503 ‐60 270 82	No significant Intercept
RRLTWRC450 6908218 437980 506 ‐60 272 118	No significant Intercept
RRLTWRC451 6908218 438061 506 ‐60 270 120	No significant Intercept
RRLTWRC452 6908217 438137 506 ‐60 270 120	No significant Intercept
RRLTWRC453 6908217 438219 507 ‐60 270 120	No significant Intercept
RRLTWRC454 6909639 437819 508 ‐60 271 95	54 59 5 2.32

Page 73

Quarterly Report to 30 June 2017

==> picture [124 x 37] intentionally omitted <==

RRLTWRC454 RRLTWRC454 RRLTWRC454	69 72 3 2.76 75 83 8 2.39 92 93 1 2.57
RRLTWRC455 6909299 437819 507 ‐60 268 170	58 88 30 2.54
RRLTWRC455	124 126 2 1.45
RRLTWRC456 6909700 437642 504 ‐60 272 53	No significant Intercept
RRLTWRC457 6909773 437643 503 ‐60 272 58	No significant Intercept
RRLTWRC458 6909904 437504 502 ‐60 272 63	No significant Intercept
RRLTWRC459 6909902 437578 503 ‐60 270 68	No significant Intercept
RRLTWRC460 6910059 437617 503 ‐60 270 82	No significant Intercept
RRLTWRC461 6910059 437720 503 ‐60 270 100	No significant Intercept
RRLTWRC462 6910217 437444 500 ‐60 271 82	No significant Intercept
RRLTWRC463 6910220 437520 501 ‐60 270 94	No significant Intercept
RRLTWRC464 6910218 437599 501 ‐60 270 88	No significant Intercept
RRLTWRC465 6910219 437681 502 ‐60 269 124	34 35 1 2.15
RRLTWRC466 6910379 437460 499 ‐60 271 82	No significant Intercept
RRLTWRC467 6910380 437600 500 ‐60 269 82	No significant Intercept
RRLTWRC468 6910379 437744 501 ‐60 268 82	No significant Intercept
RRLTWRC469 6909640 437710 506 ‐60 270 46	16 18 2 1.39
RRLTWRC469	24 25 1 1.42
RRLTWRC470 6909658 437707 506 ‐60 270 40	37 40 3 2.64
RRLTWRC471 6909681 437709 506 ‐60 270 40	14 20 6 1.67
RRLTWRC472 6909698 437707 506 ‐60 269 40	17 22 5 1.16
RRLTWRC473 6909719 437710 505 ‐60 270 52	22 23 1 1.24

Page 74

Quarterly Report to 30 June 2017

==> picture [124 x 37] intentionally omitted <==

RRLTWRC473 25 26 1 1.36

Page 75