AI assistant
Mersen — Interim / Quarterly Report 2012
Oct 9, 2012
1518_ir_2012-10-09_5ba7b589-abb5-40c2-96bd-5c86c274dc81.pdf
Interim / Quarterly Report
Open in viewerOpens in your device viewer
2012 FIRST-HALF FINANCIAL REPORT
MERSEN 2012 First-half fi nancial report
| page | |
|---|---|
| Message from the Chairman of the Management Board | 2 |
| Management Report | 3 |
| Consolidated financial statements | 7 |
| Appendix | 17 |
| Statutory auditors' report on the 2012 interim fi nancial information | 49 |
| Statement of the officer | 51 |
This document is a free translation into English for convenience purposes only of the French half-year report.
MESSAGE FROM THE CHAIRMAN OF THE MANAGEMENT BOARD
Dear fellow shareholder,
After an outstanding 2011, this year began in a less favorable economic environment. However, while the situation in Europe deteriorated in the fi rst half, North America and Asia helped to drive business momentum.
The fi rst six months of the year also represented a period of adjustment in the solar market. Photovoltaic cell production considerably outstripped demand in 2011, prompting manufacturers to severely cut back their output in the latter part of the year to give the market time to absorb the excess inventories. These market conditions severely affected our sales to photovoltaic cell manufacturers who were restructuring their operations. Solar panels are nonetheless still being installed throughout the world and this year's volumes may well exceed those for 2011. This is a very positive development that will drive up the pace of cell inventory drawdowns, leading before too long to an upturn in orders for our Group. Polysilicon manufacturers continued to invest during the fi rst half and the order fl ow in this segment remained solid.
The other renewable energy markets enjoyed strong growth, with the windpower segment benefi ting from the market launch of new products that improve the turbines' performance.
Our chemicals-pharmaceuticals business has a signifi cant order backlog, thanks to major capital expenditure programs by Asian and North American groups that rank among the world leaders in their markets.
A key strategic growth driver for our Group, the electronics market wavered in the fi rst-half due to a slowdown in investment, particularly in new electrical networks, but its potential for growth over the medium term is unchanged.
Our other markets – transportation and the process industries – contracted during the fi rst half in line with macroeconomic trends in Europe and worldwide.
Despite this fall-off in business and the increased proportion of revenue derived from the lower-margin chemicals segment, recurring operating margin nevertheless represented a solid 10.4% of sales. Considering the limited contribution of our two growth drivers – Solar Energy and Electronics – during the period, this represents an encouraging performance that attests to our Group's ability to withstand a business downturn and to act swiftly to align the cost base with changed market conditions.
During the period, we also kept up our efforts to maximize cash fl ow. This led to a sharp rise in net cash from operating activities to €40 million.
Lastly, in July we fi nalized the refi nancing of our syndicated credit facility that was due to expire in July 2013. Demonstrating their confi dence in Mersen, our fi nancial partners have provided us with the fi nancial resources needed to continue growing our business.
Our technological expertise and worldwide presence have helped to ensure that we remain competitive in this unsettled environment. We expect the solar market to pick up during the fourth quarter and some segments of the electronics market should also show signs of recovering. Our chemicals-pharmaceuticals business already has a solid order backlog and 2013 looks set to be a good year in this segment.
I'm convinced that our Group's unique positioning in buoyant markets and fast-growing regions, as well as our robust customer partnerships and our global business base, will serve us well in the coming years.
Luc Themelin Chairman of the Management Board
CONSOLIDATED RESULTS
Y Sales
In the fi rst half of 2012, Mersen's consolidated sales totaled €427.1 million, an increase of 1.8% taking into account the integration of Eldre and positive currency effects. At constant scope and exchange rates, sales were down 6%.
Economic conditions in Europe were tough during the period. Sales in the solar market also fell sharply, due to weak production of photovoltaic cells by Chinese manufacturers, which had built up large inventories in 2011. In addition, graphite sales for use in new solar kilns and invoiced to a North American customer in early 2011 did not recur. As a result, sales in this market in the fi rst half of 2012 amounted to €28 million versus €57 million in the year-earlier period.
Outside the solar business, sales rose by 1.9% at constant scope and exchange rates. Business levels grew in wind power, conventional energy and chemicals/pharmaceuticals. In process industries, the trend was positive for the materials division, while the electrical division was affected by the European slowdown. The downturn seen at the start of the year intensifi ed in Europe, with business levels falling in most countries. However, growth remained fi rm in Asia and North America, although it slowed at the end of the fi rst-half period.
| In millions of euros | 2012 First half | 2011 First half | Total growth |
Organic growth |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Advanced Materials and Technologies | 184.3 | 189.4 | -2.7% | -7.9% |
| Electrical Components and Technologies | 242.8 | 230.0 | 5.6% | -4.3% |
| GROUP TOTAL | 427.1 | 419.4 | 1.8% | -6.0% |
| Europe | 150.7 | 158.0 | -4.6% | -9.7% |
| Asia-Pacific | 111.1 | 103.6 | 7.2% | -1.8% |
| North America | 142.4 | 134.1 | 6.2% | -5.7% |
| Rest of the world | 22.9 | 23.7 | -3.5% | -2.4% |
| GROUP TOTAL | 427.1 | 419.4 | 1.8% | -6.0% |
Sales in Advanced Materials and Technologies fell by 7.9% at constant scope and exchange rates. The decline was caused by a temporary dip in sales in the solar market, and by a very high base for comparison. In other markets, the division's sales were up 9.6% at constant scope and exchange rates. Business levels were robust in process industries - mainly in the USA and Asia - and the Group has adjusted its graphite production capacity to cater for these industries. Sales also rose in the aerospace and chemicals/pharmaceuticals markets.
In Electrical Components and Technologies, sales were down 4.3% at constant scope and exchange rates. The fall in sales accelerated in the second quarter, and was driven in particular by the macroeconomic situation in Europe. Although business conditions were tough in the process industries, rail transport and power electronics markets, they remained positive in the wind power and aerospace markets.
1
Y EBITDA and operating income before non-recurring items
| In millions of euros | 2012 First half | 2011 First half |
|---|---|---|
| Operating income before non-recurring items(a) | 44.4 | 54.2 |
| Impairment, depreciation and amortization | 19.8 | 18.9 |
| EBITDA | 64.2 | 73.1 |
| % of sales | 15.0% | 17.4% |
(a) Based on the definition laid down in CNC regulation 2009.R.03.
Mersen generated EBITDA(1) of €64.2 million in the fi rst half of 2012, down 12% on the year-earlier period due to tough operating conditions.
EBITDA margin was 15%, down 2.4 points year-on-year. Margins fell in both of the Group's divisions, and resulted mainly from lower business levels (at constant scope and exchange rates) and a less positive product mix. Sales fell sharply in the solar market, where Mersen achieves high margins, while they increased in the lower-margin chemicals/pharmaceuticals market. However, these two effects were partly offset by a productivity and cost containment plan, which had an overall impact of €8 million.
Operating margin before non-recurring items also fell to 10.4%, 2.5 points lower than in the fi rst half of 2011. However, this margin fi gure represents a 0.5-point increase on the fi rst half of 2010.
| In millions of euros | 2012 First half | 2011 First half | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sales | 427.1 | 419.4 | +1.8% |
| Gross margin | 129.2 | 134.3 | -3.8% |
| % of sales | 30.3% | 32.0% | |
| Selling, marketing and other costs | (40.6) | (40.7) | -- |
| Administrative and R&D costs | (44.2) | (39.4) | (12.2%) |
| Total fixed costs (excluding production) | (84.8) | (80.1) | (5.9%) |
| Operating income before non-recurring items | 44.4 | 54.2 | (18.1%) |
| % of sales | 10.4% | 12.9% |
Gross margin fell because of weaker coverage of fi xed production costs - particularly depreciation - as business levels declined. Administrative, selling, marketing and R&D costs were higher than in the fi rst half of 2011, due to movements in exchange rates and the Eldre acquisition. At constant scope and exchange rates, they have slightly decreased because of a cost containment plan that offset the impact of infl ation and expenses undertaken in late 2011.
Y Net income
Net income attributable to Group equity holders came in at €22.5 million, versus €31.5 million in the year-earlier period.
| In millions of euros | 2012 First half | 2011 First half |
|---|---|---|
| Operating income before non-recurring items | 44.4 | 54.2 |
| Non-recurring income and expenses, net | (2.4) | (2.0) |
| Amortization and impairment of revalued intangible assets | (0.4) | (0.4) |
| Operating income | 41.6 | 51.8 |
| Net finance costs | (6.6) | (4.8) |
| Income tax | (11.7) | (15.7) |
| Net income from continuing operations | 23.3 | 31.3 |
| Net (loss)/income from operations sold or discontinued | (0.4) | 1.6 |
| Consolidated net income | 22.9 | 32.9 |
| Net income attributable to Group equity holders | 22.5 | 31.5 |
The main items on the consolidated income statement are as follows:
- Non-recurring income and expenses resulted in a net charge of €2.4 million, relating to restructuring costs and acquisition fees.
- Amortization of revalued intangible assets amounted to €0.4 million, the same as in 2011.
- Mersen's net fi nance costs totaled €6.6 million in the fi rst half of 2012, taking into account a year-on-year increase in interest charges.
- The tax charge was €11.7 million, giving an effective tax rate of 33%, in line with the 2011 rate.
CASH AND DEBT
Y Condensed statement of cash fl ows
| In millions of euros | 2012 First half | 2011 First half |
|---|---|---|
| Net cash from operating activities before change in WCR | 61.2 | 72.3 |
| Change in working capital requirement | (7.8) | (38.0) |
| Change in income tax | (13.7) | (16.3) |
| Net cash from discontinued operations | -- | (0.2) |
| Net cash from operating activities | 39.7 | 17.8 |
| Capital expenditure | (14.7) | (21.5) |
| Net cash from continuing operations after capital expenditure | 25.0 | (3.7) |
| Impact of changes in the scope of consolidation | (26.9) | 0.9 |
| Disposals of non-current assets and other | (0.7) | 3.1 |
| Net cash from/(used by) operating and investing activities | (2.6) | 0.3 |
| Interest payments | (6.3) | (4.6) |
| Dividends paid | (0.1) | (0.3) |
| Issue of new shares and other | 0.1 | |
| Net cash flow before change in debt | (9.0) | (4.5) |
Net cash from operating activities increased substantially relative to the fi rst half of 2011 due to a reduced working capital requirement as business levels fell and the "Cash Initiative" program continued.
Capital expenditure amounted to €14.7 million and related mainly to maintenance investments.
Cash fl ows relating to changes in the scope of consolidation concern the Eldre acquisition.
Y Balance sheet
At June 30, 2012, net debt totaled €255 million versus €239 million at end-2011. This €16 million increase refl ects the cost of acquiring Eldre at the start of the year (around €30 million) and an adverse €5 million currency effect caused mainly by the rise in the US dollar against the euro.
The Group's fi nancial position remains solid. At the end of the period, the net debt/EBITDA leverage ratio was 1.98* (1.61* at end-2011) and net debt/equity (gearing) was 46%* versus 44%* at end-2011.
| June 30, 2012 | Dec. 31, 2011 | |
|---|---|---|
| Total net debt (in millions of euros) | 255.2 | 239.5 |
| Net debt/equity* | 0.46 | 0.44 |
| Net debt/EBITDA* | 1.98 | 1.66 |
RECENT TRENDS AND OUTLOOK FOR 2012
Y Financing
In July 2012, the Group fi nalized the refi nancing of its syndicated revolving facility maturing in July 2013 by the implementation of new bank credit lines totaling €215 million.
These credit lines consist of:
- a syndicated credit revolving facility in two tranches, respectively, € 100 million and USD 75 million, both maturing in fi ve years, repayable at maturity. This syndicated credit facility was subscribed by a banking syndicate comprising leading French and international banks.
- bilateral credits revolving facility totaling € 55 million, with an average maturity of four years.
The average maturity of the utilizations is now close to 5 years.
Y Outlook
The economic environment is expected to remain fairly unfavorable in the second half of the year. However, the solar market should pick up during the fourth quarter, although there has not yet been any sign of a signifi cant rebound in the order fl ow.
Deliveries to the chemicals market look set to remain high, leading to a less favorable product-mix than in 2011 although the effect will be partly offset by on-going implementation of productivity and cost containment plans.
Looking further ahead, the Group will remain focused on its strategy and will maintain business momentum by leveraging its buoyant solar and electronics markets, along with its robust order backlog in the chemicals market.
* according to the calculation used for covenants applied to the USD100m private placement issued in November 2011 and to the new syndicated credit facility subscribed in July 2012.
Y CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
SCOPE OF CONSOLIDATION AT JUNE 30, 2012
LIST OF CONSOLIDATED COMPANIES
| Method of consolidation F C: Full consolidation |
% of voting rights held by the Group |
% of the share capital owned by the Group |
||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1. | MERSEN (France) | FC | 100 | 100 |
| 2. | MERSEN France Amiens S.A.S (France) | FC | 100 | 100 |
| 3. | MERSEN France Gennevilliers S.A.S (France) | FC | 100 | 100 |
| - MERSEN France Cevins S.A.S (France) | FC | 100 | 100 | |
| 4. | MERSEN France Py S.A.S (France) | FC | 100 | 100 |
| 5. | MERSEN Corporate Services S.A.S (France) | FC | 100 | 100 |
| 6. | MERSEN France SB S.A.S (France) | FC | 100 | 100 |
| - MERSEN France La Mure S.A.S (France) | FC | 100 | 100 | |
| - Eldre S.A.S (France) | FC | 100 | 100 | |
| - MERSEN Österreich Wien Gmbh (Austria) | FC | 100 | 100 | |
| - MERSEN CZ S.R.O. (Czech Republic) | FC | 100 | 100 | |
| - M.Schneider Hungaria Kft (Hungary) | FC | 100 | 100 | |
| - MERSEN Tunisie SARL (Tunisia) | FC | 100 | 100 | |
| - MIRO Holding SAS (France) | FC | 100 | 100 | |
| - FUSES & SWITCHGEAR (Hong-Kong) | FC | 100 | 100 | |
| - Zhejiang Mingrong Electrical Protection Company (China) | FC | 100 | 100 | |
| - MERSEN FMA Japan KK (Japan) | FC | 100 | 100 | |
| - MERSEN Japan KK (Japan) | FC | 100 | 100 | |
| - MERSEN France Gorcy S.A.S (France) | FC | 100 | 100 | |
| 7. | MERSEN France Grésy S.A.S (France) | FC | 100 | 100 |
| 8. | Boostec (France) | FC | 85 | 85 |
| 9. | MERSEN Deutschland Holding GmbH & Co. KG (Germany) | FC | 100 | 100 |
| - MERSEN Deutschland FFM AG (Germany) | FC | 100 | 100 | |
| - Belanova-Kalbach GmbH (Germany) | FC | 100 | 100 | |
| - Kalinova-Kalbach GmbH (Germany) | FC | 100 | 100 | |
| - MERSEN Österreich Hittisau Ges.m.b.H. (Austria) | FC | 100 | 100 | |
| - MERSEN Deutschland Lisengericht GmbH (Germany) | FC | 100 | 100 | |
| - MERSEN Deutschland Suhl GmbH (Germany) | FC | 100 | 100 | |
| - MERSEN Deutschland Eggolsheim GmbH (Germany) | FC | 100 | 100 | |
| 10. MERSEN Deutschland Jestetten GmbH (Germany) | FC | 100 | 100 | |
| 11. MERSEN Ibérica S.A (Spain) | FC | 50 | 50 | |
| 12. MERSEN Ibérica BCN S.A (Spain) | FC | 100 | 100 | |
| 13. MERSEN UK Holdings Ltd. (UK) | FC | 100 | 100 | |
| - MERSEN UK Portslade Ltd. (UK) | FC | 100 | 100 | |
| - Le Carbone (Holdings) Ltd. (UK) | FC | 100 | 100 | |
| - MERSEN UK Teeside Ltd. (UK) | FC | 100 | 100 |
| Method of consolidation | % of voting rights | % of the share capital | |
|---|---|---|---|
| F C: Full consolidation | held by the Group | owned by the Group | |
| 14. MERSEN Scot. Holding Ltd. (UK) | FC | 100 | 100 |
| - MERSEN Scotland Holytown Ltd. (UK) | FC | 100 | 100 |
| 15. MERSEN Italia Spa. (Italy) | FC | 100 | 100 |
| 16. MERSEN Benelux B.V (Netherlands) | FC | 100 | 100 |
| 17. MERSEN Nordic AB (Sweden) | FC | 100 | 100 |
| 18. MERSEN Canada Dn Ltée / Ltd. (Canada) | FC | 100 | 100 |
| - MERSEN Canada Toronto Inc. (Canada) | FC | 100 | 100 |
| 19. MERSEN USA Bn Corp. (Etats-Unis) | FC | 100 | 100 |
| - MERSEN USA Holding Corp. (USA) | FC | 100 | 100 |
| - MERSEN USA Greenville-MI Corp. (USA) | FC | 100 | 100 |
| - MERSEN USA St Marys-PA Corp. (USA) | FC | 100 | 100 |
| - MERSEN USA Midland-MI Inc. (USA) | FC | 100 | 100 |
| - MERSEN USA Oxnard-CA Inc. (USA) | FC | 100 | 100 |
| - MERSEN USA Gonzales-LA LLC (USA) | FC | 51 | 51 |
| - Eldre Corporation (USA) | FC | 100 | 100 |
| - Ugimagnet Corp. (USA) | FC | 100 | 100 |
| - MERSEN USA Newburyport-MA LLC (USA) | FC | 100 | 100 |
| - MERSEN de México Juarez, S.A DE. C.V (Mexico) | FC | 100 | 100 |
| 20. MERSEN México Monterrey, S de R.L. de C.V. (Mexico) | FC | 100 | 100 |
| 21. MERSEN Oceania, Pty Ltd. (Australia) | FC | 100 | 100 |
| 22. MERSEN Korea Co. Ltd. (South Korea) | FC | 100 | 100 |
| 23. MERSEN India Pvt. Ltd. (India) | FC | 100 | 100 |
| 24. SCI Carbon Brushes Pvt. Ltd. (India) | FC | 100 | 100 |
| 25. MERSEN China holding Co. Ltd (China) | FC | 100 | 100 |
| - MERSEN Pudong Co Ltd (China) | FC | 100 | 100 |
| - MERSEN Chongqing Co Ltd (China) | FC | 100 | 100 |
| - Carbone Lorraine Components Kunshan Co Ltd (China) | FC | 100 | 100 |
| - MERSEN Kunshan Co Ltd (China) | FC | 100 | 100 |
| - Shanghai Carbone Lorraine Chemical Equipment Cy Ltd (China) | FC | 100 | 100 |
| - MERSEN Xianda Shanghai Co. Ltd (China) | FC | 100 | 100 |
| - MERSEN Shanghai Co. Ltd (China) | FC | 100 | 100 |
| - Ferraz Shawmut (Kunshan) Company (China) | FC | 100 | 100 |
| - MERSEN Yantai Co (China) | FC | 60 | 60 |
| - Beijing Elsta M.Schneider Co Ltd (China) | FC | 100 | 100 |
| 26. MERSEN South Africa PTY Ltd (South Africa) | FC | 69 | 69 |
| - Statcor Electrical (South Africa) | FC | 69 | 69 |
| - Dustria Investment (South Africa) | FC | 69 | 69 |
| 27. MERSEN do Brasil Ltda. (Brazil) | FC | 100 | 100 |
| 28. MERSEN Istanbul Sanayi Ürünleri AS (Turkey) | FC | 100 | 100 |
The fi scal year of all these companies is the same as the calendar year
CHANGES IN THE SCOPE OF CONSOLIDATION DURING THE PAST TWO YEARS
The principal changes that affected the consolidated fi nancial statements in 2011 and 2012 are presented below:
- during fi scal 2011:
- Chinese company Beijing Elsta M. Schneider Co. Ltd., whose non-controlling shareholders the Group bought out in the fi rst half of 2011, was consolidated for the fi rst time from January 1, 2011.
- Mersen Istanbul Sanayi Ürünleri was consolidated for the fi rst time from January 1, 2011.
Given that these changes in scope were not material, no pro forma fi nancial statements were prepared.
- during fi scal 2012:
- Mersen France SB S.A.S acquired a 100% stake in Eldre SAS, which was consolidated for the fi rst time from January 1, 2012.
- Mersen USA Holding Corp acquired a 100% stake in US company Eldre Corporation, which was consolidated for the fi rst time from January 1, 2012.
CONSOLIDATED INCOME STATEMENT
| Note In millions of euros |
2012 First half | 2011 First half |
|---|---|---|
| CONTINUING OPERATIONS | ||
| Consolidated sales 17 |
427.1 | 419.4 |
| Cost of sales | (297.9) | (285.1) |
| Gross margin | 129.2 | 134.3 |
| Selling and marketing costs | (40.5) | (38.3) |
| Administrative and research costs | (44.2) | (39.4) |
| Other operating costs | (0.1) | (2.4) |
| Operating income before non-recurring items | 44.4 | 54.2 |
| Non-recurring charges 16 |
(2.4) | (3.4) |
| Non-recurring income 16 |
1.4 | |
| Amortization of revalued intangible assets | (0.4) | (0.4) |
| Operating income 17/19 |
41.6 | 51.8 |
| Financial expense | (6.6) | (4.8) |
| Financial income | ||
| Finance costs 20 |
(6.6) | (4.8) |
| Net finance costs | (6.6) | (4.8) |
| Income before tax and non-recurring items | 35.0 | 47.0 |
| Current and deferred income tax 21 |
(11.7) | (15.7) |
| Net income from continuing operations | 23.3 | 31.3 |
| Net income from assets held for sale or discontinued operations 4 |
(0.4) | 1.6 |
| Net (loss)/income for the year | 22.9 | 32.9 |
| Attributable to: | ||
| - Group equity holders | 22.5 | 31.5 |
| - Minority interests | 0.4 | 1.4 |
| NET INCOME FOR THE PERIOD | 22.9 | 32.9 |
| Earnings per share 22 |
||
| Basic earnings per share (€) | 1.11 | 1.58 |
| Diluted earnings per share (€) | 1.07 | 1.52 |
| Earnings per share from continuing operations 22 |
||
| Basic earnings per share (€) | 1.13 | 1.50 |
| Diluted earnings per share (€) | 1.09 | 1.44 |
CONDENSED STATEMENT OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
| In millions of euros | Note | 2012 First half | 2011 First half |
|---|---|---|---|
| NET INCOME FOR THE PERIOD | 22.9 | 32.9 | |
| Change in fair value of hedging derivatives | 20 | (0.1) | 1.0 |
| Change in balance sheet items at year-end exchange rate | 7.5 | (18.4) | |
| Tax on income recognized in equity | 20 | (0.1) | (0.4) |
| INCOME AND EXPENSE RECOGNIZED DIRECTLY IN EQUITY | 7.3 | (17.8) | |
| TOTAL INCOME AND EXPENSE RECOGNIZED DURING THE PERIOD | 30.2 | 15.1 | |
| Attributable to: | |||
| - Group equity holders | 29.7 | 14.7 | |
| - Minority interests | 0.5 | 0.4 | |
| TOTAL INCOME AND EXPENSE RECOGNIZED DURING THE PERIOD | 30.2 | 15.1 |
STATEMENT OF FINANCIAL POSITION
Assets
| In millions of euros | Note | June 30, 2012 | Dec. 31, 2011 |
|---|---|---|---|
| NON-CURRENT ASSETS | |||
| Intangible assets | |||
| - Goodwill | 6 | 284.7 | 264.0 |
| - Other intangible assets | 8 | 39.4 | 40.0 |
| Property, plant and equipment | 8 | ||
| - Land | 29.6 | 28.5 | |
| - Buildings | 62.5 | 58.6 | |
| - Plant, equipment and other assets | 191.4 | 189.5 | |
| - Assets in progress | 33.4 | 29.6 | |
| Non-current financial assets | |||
| - Investments | 9 | 5.8 | 4.9 |
| - Non-current derivatives | |||
| - Other financial assets | 3/15 | 7.2 | 8.6 |
| Non-current tax assets | |||
| - Deferred tax assets | 21 | 27.6 | 25.7 |
| - Long-term portion of current tax assets | 2.7 | 2.1 | |
| TOTAL NON-CURRENT ASSETS | 684.3 | 651.5 | |
| CURRENT ASSETS | |||
| - Inventories | 10 | 198.5 | 188.7 |
| - Trade receivables | 11 | 141.3 | 128.0 |
| - Other receivables | 24.5 | 20.7 | |
| - Short-term portion of current tax assets | 3.0 | 4.6 | |
| - Other current assets | |||
| - Current financial assets | 15 | 9.0 | 5.3 |
| - Current derivatives | 3 | 0.4 | 0.5 |
| - Financial assets | 15 | ||
| - Cash and cash equivalents | 15 | 39.4 | 52.2 |
| TOTAL CURRENT ASSETS | 416.1 | 400.0 | |
| TOTAL ASSETS | 1,100.4 | 1,051.5 |
Liabilities and equity
| In millions of euros | Note | June 30, 2012 | Dec. 31, 2011 |
|---|---|---|---|
| EQUITY | |||
| - Share capital | 12 | 40.6 | 40.6 |
| - Premiums and retained earnings | 493.2 | 455.8 | |
| - Net income for the period | 22.5 | 56.9 | |
| - Cumulative translation adjustments | (13.4) | (20.8) | |
| EQUITY ATTRIBUTABLE TO MERSEN'S SHAREHOLDERS | 542.9 | 532.5 | |
| - Owners of non-controlling interests | 10.8 | 10.4 | |
| EQUITY | 553.7 | 542.9 | |
| NON-CURRENT LIABILITIES | |||
| - Non-current provisions | 13 | 0.7 | 0.5 |
| - Employee benefits | 14 | 37.3 | 35.6 |
| - Deferred tax liabilities | 21 | 25.9 | 24.8 |
| - Borrowings | 15 | 275.2 | 261.7 |
| - Non-current derivatives | 3 | 2.1 | 2.1 |
| TOTAL NON-CURRENT LIABILITIES | 341.2 | 324.7 | |
| CURRENT LIABILITIES | |||
| - Trade payables | 68.3 | 64.0 | |
| - Other payables | 74.1 | 67.8 | |
| - Current provisions | 13 | 2.6 | 5.0 |
| - Short-term portion of current tax assets | 3.9 | 5.5 | |
| - Other liabilities | 13 | 27.3 | 5.1 |
| - Other current financial liabilities | 15 | 9.2 | 5.3 |
| - Current derivatives | 3 | 0.9 | 1.2 |
| - Current advances | 15 | ||
| - Bank overdrafts | 15 | 19.2 | 30.0 |
| TOTAL CURRENT LIABILITIES | 205.5 | 183.9 | |
| TOTAL LIABILITIES AND EQUITY | 1,100.4 | 1,051.5 |
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN EQUITY
| Attributable to Mersen's shareholders | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| In millions of euros | Share capital |
Premiums and retained earnings |
Net income for the period |
Cumulative translation adjustment |
Total | Non controlling interests |
Equity |
| EQUITY AT DEC. 31, 2010 | 39.9 | 432.2 | 38.4 | (29.7) | 480.8 | 12.9 | 493.7 |
| Prior-period net income | 38.4 | (38.4) | 0.0 | 0.0 | |||
| Net income for the period | 31.5 | 31.5 | 1.4 | 32.9 | |||
| Change in fair value of hedging derivatives, net of taxes | 0.6 | 0.6 | 0.6 | ||||
| Cumulative translation adjustment | (17.4) | (17.4) | (1.0) | (18.4) | |||
| TOTAL OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME | 0.0 | 0.6 | 0.0 | (17.4) | (16.8) | (1.0) | (17.8) |
| COMPREHENSIVE INCOME FOR THE PERIOD | 0.0 | 0.6 | 31.5 | (17.4) | 14.7 | 0.4 | 15.1 |
| Dividends paid | (15.0) | (15.0) | (0.3) | (15.3) | |||
| Issue of new shares | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.1 | ||||
| Treasury shares | 0.6 | 0.6 | 0.6 | ||||
| Other items | (10.4) | (10.4) | (4.1) | (14.5) | |||
| EQUITY AT JUNE 30, 2011 | 39.9 | 446.5 | 31.5 | (47.1) | 470.8 | 8.9 | 479.7 |
| EQUITY AT DEC. 31, 2011 | 40.6 | 455.8 | 56.9 | (20.8) | 532.5 | 10.4 | 542.9 |
| Prior-period net income | 56.9 | (56.9) | 0.0 | 0.0 | |||
| Net income for the period | 22.5 | 22.5 | 0.4 | 22.9 | |||
| Change in fair value of hedging derivatives, net of taxes | (0.2) | (0.2) | (0.2) | ||||
| Cumulative translation adjustment | 7.4 | 7.4 | 0.1 | 7.5 | |||
| TOTAL OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME | 0.0 | (0.2) | 0.0 | 7.4 | 7.2 | 0.1 | 7.3 |
| COMPREHENSIVE INCOME FOR THE PERIOD | 0.0 | (0.2) | 22.5 | 7.4 | 29.7 | 0.5 | 30.2 |
| Dividends not yet paid | (20.3) | (20.3) | (0.1) | (20.4) | |||
| Issue of new shares | 0.0 | 0.0 | |||||
| Expenses on issue of new shares | 0.0 | 0.0 | |||||
| Treasury shares | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | ||||
| Change in non-controlling interests | 0.0 | 0.0 | |||||
| Other items | 0.0 | 0.0 | |||||
| EQUITY AT JUNE 30, 2012 | 40.6 | 493.2 | 22.5 | (13.4) | 542.9 | 10.8 | 553.7 |
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
| In millions of euros | 2012 First half | 2011 First half |
|---|---|---|
| Income before tax | 34.6 | 47.0 |
| Depreciation and amortization | 19.8 | 18.9 |
| Additions to/(write-backs from) provisions | 0.3 | 2.2 |
| Net finance costs | 6.5 | 4.8 |
| Capital gains/(losses) on asset disposals | 0.2 | |
| Other | (0.8) | |
| Net cash from operating activities before change in WCR | 61.2 | 72.3 |
| Change in working capital requirement | (7.8) | (38.0) |
| Income tax paid | (13.7) | (16.3) |
| Net cash from continuing operations | 39.7 | 18.0 |
| Net cash from discontinued operations | (0.2) | |
| Net cash from operating activities | 39.7 | 17.8 |
| Investing activities | ||
| Increase in intangible assets | (0.2) | (0.3) |
| Increase in property, plant and equipment | (16.5) | (16.2) |
| Financial assets | (0.9) | |
| Impact of changes in the scope of consolidation | (26.9) | 0.9 |
| Other changes in net cash from/(used) by investing activities | 2.2 | (1.9) |
| Net cash from/(used by) investing activities from continuing operations | (42.3) | (17.5) |
| Net cash from/(used by) investing activities from discontinued operations | ||
| Net cash from/(used by) investing activities | (42.3) | (17.5) |
| Net cash from/(used by) operating and investing activities | (2.6) | 0.3 |
| Proceeds from issue of new shares and other increases in equity | 0.0 | 0.1 |
| Net dividends paid to shareholders and non-controlling interests | (0.1) | (0.3) |
| Interest payments | (6.3) | (4.6) |
| Change in debt (Note 15) | (4.9) | 4.0 |
| Net cash from/(used by) financing activities | (11.3) | (0.8) |
| Change in cash | (13.9) | (0.5) |
| Cash at beginning of period (Note 15) | 52.2 | 48.6 |
| Cash at end of period (Note 15) | 39.4 | 45.6 |
| Impact of changes in the scope of consolidation | (0.8) | (0.4) |
| Impact of currency fluctuations | (0.3) | 2.9 |
| CHANGE IN CASH | (13.9) | (0.5) |
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
| Note 1 | STATEMENT OF CONFORMITY | 18 |
|---|---|---|
| Note 2 | ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND PRINCIPLES OF CONSOLIDATION | 18 |
| Note 3 | FINANCIAL RISK MANAGEMENT | 26 |
| Note 4 | SALE OF THE AUTOMOBILE AND HOUSEHOLD ELECTRICAL APPLIANCE BRUSH DIVISION | 29 |
| Note 5 | BUSINESS COMBINATIONS | 29 |
| Note 6 | GOODWILL | 30 |
| Note 7 | ASSET IMPAIRMENT TESTS | 31 |
| Note 8 | PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT AND INTANGIBLE ASSETS | 32 |
| Note 9 | INVESTMENTS | 33 |
| Note 10 | INVENTORIES | 33 |
| Note 11 | TRADE RECEIVABLES | 34 |
| Note 12 | EQUITY | 34 |
| Note 13 | PROVISIONS, CONTINGENT LIABILITIES AND OTHER LIABILITIES | 35 |
| Note 14 | EMPLOYEE BENEFITS | 36 |
| Note 15 | NET DEBT | 37 |
| Note 16 | OTHER NON-RECURRING INCOME AND EXPENSES | 40 |
| Note 17 | SEGMENT REPORTING | 40 |
| Note 18 | STAFF COSTS AND HEADCOUNT | 42 |
| Note 19 | OPERATING INCOME | 42 |
| Note 20 | FINANCIAL INCOME AND COSTS | 43 |
| Note 21 | INCOME TAX | 44 |
| Note 22 | EARNINGS PER SHARE | 45 |
| Note 23 | DIVIDENDS | 45 |
| Note 24 | LEASES | 45 |
| Note 25 | RELATED PARTY DISCLOSURES | 46 |
| Note 26 | COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES | 48 |
| Note 27 | SUBSEQUENT EVENTS | 48 |
| Note 28 | APPROVAL OF THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS | 48 |
Note 1 Statement of conformity
In accordance with EC regulation no. 1606/2002 of July 19, 2002, which applies to the consolidated fi nancial statements of European companies listed on a regulated market, the consolidated fi nancial statements of Mersen and its subsidiaries (hereinafter "the Group") have been prepared in accordance with IFRSs (International Financial Reporting Standards), because the Group is listed in a European Union member state.
The new standards and interpretations not yet applied are presented in Note W.
The options adopted by the Group are stated in the following chapters.
The interim consolidated fi nancial statements for the six months ended June 30, 2012 have been prepared in accordance with IAS 34 "Interim fi nancial reporting". They do not contain all information required in the full annual fi nancial statements, and must be read in conjunction with the Group's fi nancial statements for the year ended December 31, 2011, available at www.mersen.com.
The interim consolidated fi nancial statements for the six months ended June 30, 2012 have been prepared using the recognition and measurement principles stated in the IFRSs adopted for use in the European Union at the same date.
Note 2 Accounting policies and principles of consolidation
A - Basis of consolidation
The consolidated fi nancial statements include those of the parent company and of all those companies in which the Group holds a controlling interest. Control is defi ned as the power to govern the fi nancial and operating policies of a business so as to obtain benefi ts from its activities. Subsidiaries over which the Group directly or indirectly exerts exclusive control are fully consolidated.
The results of subsidiaries acquired or disposed of during the period are included in the consolidated income statement from the acquisition date or up to the loss of control respectively.
All associate undertakings over which the Group exerts signifi cant infl uence, which is presumed to exist when the latter holds at least 20% of voting rights, are accounted for under the equity method. Subsidiaries' fi nancial statements have been adjusted where necessary to ensure consistency with the policies used by all Group entities within the scope of consolidation.
All intra-Group transactions and balances have been eliminated.
The consolidated fi nancial statements have been prepared in euros.
The Group's business activities do not experience signifi cant seasonal fl uctuations. Both sales and purchases are spread on a linear basis throughout the year.
B - Presentation of the financial statements
The Mersen group prepares its fi nancial statements in line with the accounting principles laid down in the revised IAS 1 - Presentation of fi nancial statements.
B1 - Statement of comprehensive income
Given customary practice and the nature of its business activities, the Group has opted for the "by function of expense" format of the income statement, which consists of classifying costs according to their function under cost of sales, selling, administrative, research and development costs.
The Group presents comprehensive income in two statements consisting of an income statement and a separate statement showing income and other components of comprehensive income.
B2 - Statement of financial position
Assets and liabilities arising during the business cycle and those with a maturity of less than 12 months at the balance sheet date are classifi ed as current. All other assets and liabilities are classifi ed as non-current.
B3 - Statement of cash flows
The Group prepares the consolidated statement of cash fl ows using the indirect method and as stipulated in IAS 7.
The indirect method consists of determining cash fl ows from operating activities whose net income or loss is adjusted for the effects of non-cash transactions and items arising from investing or fi nancing activities.
B4 - Assets and liabilities held for sale and discontinued operations
In accordance with IFRS 5, assets and liabilities that are immediately available for sale in their current state and the sale of which is highly probable are shown on the balance sheet under assets and liabilities held for sale. Where a group of assets is held for sale in a single transaction and the group of assets represents a distinct component of the entity (business line or principal and distinct geographical region covered by a single and coordinated disposal plan or a subsidiary acquired solely for resale), the group of assets and corresponding liabilities is considered as a whole. The disposal must take place in the year following this presentation of the asset or group of assets.
The non-current assets or group of assets held for sale are stated at the lower of their carrying amount and fair value net of disposal costs. Non-current assets appearing on the balance sheet as held for sale are no longer depreciated once they are presented as such.
The results recorded by groups of assets satisfying the defi nition of a business held for sale or discontinued operation are presented by separating out their results from continuing operations, and their cash fl ows are presented separately on the cash fl ow statement.
C - Foreign currency translation
The fi nancial statements of the Group's foreign subsidiaries are prepared in their functional currency.
The balance sheets of companies whose functional currency is not the euro are translated into euros at the closing rate, except for equity, which is translated at the historic exchange rate. Income statement items are translated at the average exchange rate for the period. The average exchange rate represents the approximate value of the exchange rate at the transaction date in the absence of signifi cant fl uctuations.
Foreign exchange differences resulting from translation are recognized under other comprehensive income and are presented in the currency translation reserve component of equity. However, if the transaction relates to a subsidiary that is not wholly owned, a foreign exchange difference proportional to the percentage of ownership is allocated to non-controlling interests. Where a foreign operation is sold and control or signifi cant infl uence or joint control is lost, the aggregate amount of the corresponding foreign exchange differences is reclassifi ed in income. Where the Group sells part of its equity interest in a subsidiary that includes a foreign operation while retaining control, a proportional share of the aggregate amount of the foreign exchange differences is reallocated to non-controlling interests. Where the Group sells just a part of its interest in an associate or proportionally consolidated company that includes a foreign operation, while retaining signifi cant infl uence or joint control, the proportionate share of the aggregate amount of foreign exchange differences is reclassifi ed in income.
Except for cash, which is translated at the closing rate, the cash fl ow statement items are translated at the average exchange rate, except where this is not appropriate.
Translation differences arising on balance sheet items are recorded separately in equity under cumulative translation adjustments. They comprise:
- the impact of changes in exchange rates on balance sheet items;
- the difference between net income calculated at the average exchange rate and net income calculated at the closing rate.
Goodwill and fair value adjustments deriving from the acquisition of subsidiaries whose functional currency is not the euro are treated as the relevant subsidiary's assets and liabilities. They are therefore stated in the subsidiary's functional currency and translated at the closing rate.
D - Foreign currency assets and liabilities
Foreign currency transactions are recognized and measured in line with IAS 21 - Effects of changes in foreign exchange rates.
Transactions denominated in currencies other than the euro are translated at the exchange rate on the transaction date. At the end of the fi scal year, monetary assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies are translated at the closing rate. Any gains and losses arising from currency translation are taken to operating income for the period under foreign exchange gains and losses.
Translation gains and losses on fi nancial instruments denominated in foreign currencies representing a hedge of a net investment in a foreign operation are recorded in equity under cumulative translation adjustments.
E - Hedging
Hedging transactions are recognized and measured in line with the principles laid down in IAS 32 and 39.
E1 - Currency and commodity hedges
A currency derivative is eligible for hedge accounting where the hedging relationship was documented at the outset and its effectiveness has been demonstrated throughout its life.
A hedge is a way of protecting against fl uctuations in the value of assets, liabilities and irrevocable commitments. A hedge also helps to protect against adverse fl uctuations in cash fl ows (sales generated by the assets of the business, for instance).
Derivative instruments are stated at their fair value. Changes in the fair value of these instruments are accounted for as follows:
- changes in the fair value of instruments eligible as future cash fl ow hedges are accounted for directly in equity in respect of the effective portion of the hedge (intrinsic value). Changes in the fair value of these instruments are then recognized in operating income (under "cost of sales" for commodity hedges and under "other operating costs" for currency hedges) and offset changes in the value of assets, liabilities and fi rm commitments hedged, as they occur. The time value of hedges is recorded under "other operating costs" in operating income;
- changes in the fair value of instruments not eligible as cash fl ow hedges are taken directly to income.
E2 - Interest-rate hedging
Interest rate derivatives are stated at fair value on the balance sheet. Changes in their fair value are accounted for as follows:
■ the ineffective portion of the derivative instrument is taken to income under the cost of debt;
- the effective portion of the derivative instrument is recognized as follows:
- in equity for a derivative accounted for as a cash fl ow hedge (e.g. a swap turning a debt carrying a fl oating interest rate into a fi xed-rate liability),
- in income (cost of debt) for a derivative accounted for as a fair value hedge (e.g. a swap turning a fi xed interest rate into a fl oating interest rate). This accounting treatment is offset by changes in the fair value of the hedged debt.
F - Intangible assets
The applicable standards are IAS 38 - Intangible assets, IAS 36 - Impairment of assets and IFRS 3 - Business combinations.
In accordance with IAS 38 - Intangible assets, only items in respect of which future economic benefi ts are likely to fl ow to the Group and the cost of which may be reliably determined are accounted for as intangible assets.
The Group's intangible assets primarily comprise goodwill.
Other intangible assets (customer relationships, technology) with a fi nite life are accounted for at cost less accumulated amortization and impairment. Amortization is expensed as incurred on a straight-line basis over the estimated useful life of the relevant intangible asset.
F1 - Goodwill
In line with the revised IFRS 3, upon a business combination, the Group measures goodwill as the fair value of the consideration transferred (including the fair value of any equity interest previously held in the acquiree), plus the amount of any noncontrolling interest in the acquiree, less the net amount (generally the fair value) of the identifi able assets acquired and the liabilities assumed, with all these amounts being measured at the acquisition date. If the difference above is negative, the resulting gain is recognized as a bargain purchase in income.
On a transaction by transaction basis, the Group may choose to measure at the acquisition date any non-controlling interest either at fair value or at the relevant proportion of the acquiree's identifi able net assets.
For business combinations between January 1, 2004 and January 1, 2010:
Goodwill represents the excess amount of the acquisition cost over the Group's share in the amounts recognized (generally at fair value) in respect of the assets, liabilities and contingent liabilities.
Goodwill is allocated individually to the Group's cash generating units (CGUs). The Group has defi ned the following four CGUs:
- Electrical Applications
-
Electrical Protection
-
High-Temperature Applications
- Anticorrosion Equipment
In accordance with IFRS 3 - Business combinations, goodwill is not amortized. It undergoes an impairment test whenever evidence of impairment in the value of assets appears and at least once every year.
In accordance with IAS 36, the Group tests for impairment by:
- preparing cash fl ow projections after normalized tax based on the Strategic Plan for the relevant CGU;
- determining a value in use using a method comparable to any business valuation, by discounting cash fl ows at the segment's weighted average cost of capital (WACC);
- comparing this value in use with the carrying amount of the relevant assets to determine whether or not an impairment loss needs to be recognized.
Value in use is determined based on free cash fl ow projections discounted over a period of fi ve years and a terminal value. The discount rate used for these calculations is the weighted average cost of capital for each of the cash generating units (see Note 7).
The assumptions made for sales growth and terminal values are reasonable and consistent with the market data available for each of the operating activities.
Goodwill impairment losses are irreversible.
F2 - Patents and licenses
Patents and licenses are amortized on a straight line basis over the period for which they are protected by law.
Software is amortized on a straight line basis over its probable service life, which may not exceed fi ve years.
F3 - Development costs
Under IAS 38 - Intangible assets, development costs are capitalized where:
- the entity has the intent and the fi nancial and technical ability to see the development project through to completion;
- it is probable that the expected future economic benefits deriving from development costs will fl ow to the entity;
- the cost of the asset can be measured reliably;
- and the manner in which the intangible asset will probably generate future economic benefi ts is demonstrated.
Research and development costs that do not meet the aforementioned criteria are expensed as incurred. Capitalized development costs meeting the criteria laid down in the new accounting standards are recognized as an asset on the balance sheet. They are amortized on a straight line basis over their useful life, which does not generally exceed three years.
F4 - Intangible assets acquired in connection with a business combination
Intangible assets also include technology, brands and customer relationships valued upon the acquisition of companies in accordance with IFRS 3 - Business combinations.
Amortization is expensed on a straight-line basis over the estimated useful life of the relevant intangible assets other than goodwill, once they are ready for operational use. The estimated useful lives applied for the period in question and the comparative period were as follows for the acquisitions completed:
| ■ brands with a fi nite useful life | up to 30 years |
|---|---|
| ■ patents and technologies | up to 30 years |
■ customer relationships up to 30 years
The Group studies external and internal factors associated with the asset based on the criteria laid down in the relevant accounting standard when establishing whether an intangible asset has a fi nite or infi nite useful life.
G - Property, plant and equipment
In accordance with IAS 16 - Property, plant and equipment, only items whose cost may be determined reliably and in respect of which future economic benefi ts are likely to fl ow to the Group are accounted for as property, plant and equipment.
Property, plant and equipment is stated at historical cost less accumulated depreciation and any impairment losses, except for land, which was revalued at the IFRS transition date.
Borrowing costs directly attributable to the acquisition, construction and production of qualifying assets are included in the cost of the asset.
Depreciation is calculated based on the rate of consumption of the expected economic benefi ts per item based on acquisition cost, less, where appropriate, residual value.
The various components of an item of property, plant and equipment are recognized separately where their estimated useful life and thus their depreciation period are materially different.
The Group applies the straight-line method of depreciation according to the expected service life of the item.
The periods used are as follows:
- buildings: 20 to 50 years;
- fi xtures and fi ttings: 10 to 15 years;
- plant and equipment: 3 to 10 years;
- vehicles: 3 to 5 years.
These depreciation periods, as well as the residual values, are reviewed and adjusted at the end of each fi scal year. Changes are applied prospectively.
Investment grants are recognized at the outset as a deduction from the gross value of the non-current asset.
H - Leases
Under IAS 17, a lease is classifi ed as a fi nance lease if it transfers to the lessee substantially all the risks and rewards incidental to ownership of an asset.
Where the criteria laid down in the standard are not met, the costs resulting from leases are charged to income for the period and the lease is considered as an operating lease.
Non-current assets used under a fi nance lease give rise to the recognition on the Group's balance sheet of both an item of property, plant and equipment and an obligation to make future lease payments. Leases are recognized at the lower of the fair value of the leased property and the present value of minimum payments. At the commencement of the lease term, the asset and relevant liability of the same value corresponding to the future payments under the lease are recognized on the balance sheet.
Lease payments are broken down into a fi nance charge and the repayment of the outstanding debt. The fi nance charge is allocated to each period during the lease term so as to produce a constant periodic rate of interest on the remaining balance of the liability.
The capitalized asset is depreciated over the useful life adopted by the Group for non-current assets of the same type. Where the Group is not reasonably certain that the lessee will take ownership of the asset at the end of the lease term, the asset is depreciated in full over the shorter of the term of the lease and the useful life.
In addition, a portion of the capital amount of the debt is repaid in accordance with the debt repayment schedule contained in the fi nance lease agreement.
I - Impairment of property, plant and equipment and intangible assets
In accordance with IAS 36 - Impairment of assets, when events or changes in the market environment indicate a risk of impairment, the Group's intangible assets and property, plant and equipment undergo a detailed review to determine whether their carrying amount is below their recoverable amount. This amount is defi ned as the higher of fair value less costs to sell and value in use.
Should the recoverable amount of assets fall below their carrying amount, an impairment loss is recognized in respect of the difference between these two amounts. Impairment losses recognized on property, plant and equipment and intangible assets (except for goodwill) with a defi nite useful life may be reversed subsequently if the recoverable amount becomes higher than the carrying amount again (without exceeding the impairment loss initially recognized).
The recoverable amount of assets is usually determined based on their value in use. Value in use is defi ned as the expected future economic benefi ts from their use and from their sale. It is assessed notably by reference to the discounted future cash fl ows projected based on economic assumptions and operating budgets drawn up by the Mersen group's senior management.
IAS 36 defi nes the discount rate to be used as the pre-tax interest rate refl ecting the current assessment of time value per market and the risks specifi c to the asset. It represents the return that investors would require if they had to choose an investment, the amount, maturity and risks of which are equivalent to those of the relevant asset or Cash-Generating Unit (CGU).
The discount rate used for impairment testing takes into account the fi nancial structure and gearing of companies in the sector, i.e. of peers and not of the business or group to which the asset or CGU belongs.
J - Financial assets and liabilities
Financial assets and liabilities are measured and recognized in line with IAS 39 (Financial instruments: Recognition and Measurement), IAS 32 (Financial Instruments: Disclosure and Presentation) and IFRS 7 (Disclosures).
Financial assets comprise investments available for sale, investments held to maturity, trading assets, margin deposits paid, derivatives held as assets, loans, receivables, and cash and cash equivalents.
Upon their initial measurement, all assets and liabilities not stated at fair value are measured at fair value taking transaction costs into account.
Subsequently, loans and receivables are recognized at amortized cost.
Financial liabilities comprise borrowings, other fi nancing and bank overdrafts, derivatives held as liabilities, margin deposits received in relation to derivatives and other liabilities.
Except where covered by a fair value hedge (see E2), borrowings and other fi nancial liabilities are stated at amortized cost calculated using the effective interest rate (EIR). For example, lending fees are deducted from the initial amount of the debt, then added back period by period according to the calculation of the EIR, with the amounts added back being recognized in income.
Current assets include operating receivables measured at amortized cost, with impairment losses being recognized where the carrying amount exceeds the recoverable amount.
J1 - Investments
Investments in unconsolidated subsidiaries are non-current fi nancial assets classifi ed in the available-for-sale category. They are stated at fair value. In the rare instances in which their fair value cannot be obtained, they are stated at cost.
Where there is objective evidence of impairment (financial difficulties, deterioration in performance without any growth prospects, local economic situation, etc.), any signifi cant and long-term impairment losses are recognized in income.
These impairment losses are irreversible and are not written back.
The principal activity of the unconsolidated subsidiaries is the distribution of products manufactured by the Group's consolidated companies.
Subsidiaries that, considered alone and on an aggregate basis, are not material are not included in the scope of consolidation.
A company is included in the scope of consolidation when two of the following four criteria are met for two consecutive years:
- Equity: the difference between the value of the securities and net equity exceeds 1% of the Group's equity in the previous year;
- Debt: the amount of non-Group debt exceeds €5 million;
- Sales to third parties: the entity's sales less intra-Group sales represent more than 1% of Group sales in the previous year;
- Net income: net income exceeds €0.5 million.
The materiality of unconsolidated subsidiaries is reassessed at each balance sheet date.
J2 - Other non-current financial assets
These are receivables that do not arise during the business cycle. In accordance with IAS 39, they are stated at amortized cost, with an impairment loss being recognized when the recoverable amount falls below the carrying amount.
K - Share capital
Ordinary shares are classifi ed as equity instruments. Incidental costs directly attributable to the issue of ordinary shares or stock options are deducted from equity, net of tax.
Treasury shares are deducted from equity at their acquisition cost. Any gains or losses from the sale of these shares are recognized directly in equity and are not taken to income for the year.
L - Provisions
In accordance with IAS 37 - Provisions, contingent liabilities and contingent assets, provisions are recorded when the Group is under an obligation to a third party at the end of the fi scal year that is likely or certain to trigger an outfl ow of resources to the third party representing future economic benefi ts.
The relevant obligation may be legal, regulatory, or contractual in nature. It may also derive from the Group's business practices or from its public commitments where the Group has created a legitimate expectation among such third parties that it will assume certain responsibilities.
The estimated amount shown in provisions represents the outfl ow of resources that the Group will have to incur to extinguish its obligation. Where this amount cannot be measured reliably, no provision is recorded. In this instance, information is disclosed in the notes to the fi nancial statements.
Contingent liabilities consist of a possible obligation arising from past events and whose existence will be confi rmed only by the occurrence or non-occurrence of one or more uncertain future events not wholly within the control of the entity or a probable obligation for which the outfl ow of resources is not likely. They are disclosed in the notes to the fi nancial statements.
With restructurings, an obligation exists where the restructuring has been announced and a detailed plan drawn up or execution of the plan has commenced prior to the balance sheet date.
Where the entity has a reliable schedule, the liabilities are discounted where discounting has a material effect.
M - Inventories
Inventories are carried at the lower of cost and their probable net realizable value.
Cost comprises acquisition or production cost.
The only indirect costs taken into account in the measurement of work in progress and fi nished goods are production-related expenses. No interest costs are capitalized.
N - Consolidated sales
Net sales include sales of fi nished goods and related services, sales of scrap, sales of goods purchased for resale and invoiced shipping costs.
On an incidental basis, the Group enters into construction contracts via several subsidiaries. If the outcome of a construction contract can be estimated reliably, revenues are recognized in income in proportion to the stage of completion of contract activity. The contract costs are expensed as incurred, except where they represent an asset linked to future contract activity.
A sale is recognized when the entity transfers to the buyer the risks and rewards incidental to ownership.
A sale is measured at the fair value of the consideration received or receivable. Where payment is deferred, leading to a signifi cant impact on determination of fair value, this is refl ected by discounting future payments.
The amount of revenue from the sale of goods and equipment is usually recognized when there is a formal agreement with the customer stipulating that risks have been transferred, the amount of revenue can be measured reliably and it is likely that the economic benefi ts arising from the transaction will fl ow to the Group. With agreements providing for formal acceptance of the goods, equipment or services received by the customer, recognition of the revenue is normally deferred until the date of acceptance.
Income from ancillary activities is recorded under the appropriate heading of the income statement, i.e. other revenues, fi nancial income, or as a deduction from expenses of the same type (selling, general, administrative or research).
O - Employee benefits
Under defi ned contribution plans, the Group is under no obligation other than to pay contributions. The corresponding charge, which refl ects the payment of contributions, is expensed as incurred.
In line with IAS 19, defi ned benefi t pension plans undergo an actuarial valuation using the projected unit credit method. This method sees each period of service as giving rise to an additional unit of benefi t entitlement and measures each unit separately to build up the fi nal obligation. This fi nal obligation is then discounted to present value.
These actuarial calculations are based on various estimates:
- mortality tables;
- retirement dates;
- rate of future salary and benefit increases and employee turnover;
- expected return on plan assets;
- discount and infl ation rates set for each of the relevant entities taking into account their local macro-economic environment.
Actuarial gains and losses comprise the cumulative impact of:
- experience adjustments (difference between previous actuarial assumptions and that which has actually occurred); and
- changes in actuarial assumptions.
IAS 19 states that actuarial gains and losses may offset one another in the long term. As a result, it provides for the so-called corridor approach for the recognition of post-employment benefi t obligations.
The Group has opted to use the following method:
- cumulative unrecognized actuarial gains and losses falling outside a corridor of plus or minus 10% of the value of the higher of the plan's assets and obligations are recognized and amortized over the expected average remaining working lives of the employees participating in the plan;
- gains and losses falling within the 10% corridor are not recognized;
- unrecognized net cumulative actuarial gains and losses include both the cumulative portion of the 10% within the corridor, as well as the portion outside the corridor, which has not been recognized at the balance sheet date. In accordance with IAS 19, they are disclosed in the notes to the financial statements.
O1 - Recognition of post-employment benefit obligations
The Group's post-employment benefi t obligations are accounted for as follows:
■ on the face of the balance sheet:
the amount recognized under liabilities in respect of defi ned contributions is equal to the total of:
• the present value of defi ned benefi t obligations at the balance sheet date,
- less the fair value at the balance sheet date of plan assets used directly to pay or fi nance the obligations,
- plus unrecognized actuarial gains (or less unrecognized actuarial losses) that exist under the aforementioned rule,
- less as-yet-unrecognized past service costs and payments;
- on the face of the income statement:
the amount expensed or recognized in income (net periodic cost of employee benefits) is the total amount net of the following items:
- current service cost incurred during the period (or rights vested during the period),
- interest cost (also called the discounting effect),
- expected return on plan assets: this expected return is determined based on market expectations at the beginning of the period for returns on plan assets over the entire duration of the corresponding liability (long term),
- actuarial gains and losses: portion recognized during the period,
- past service cost: portion recognized during the period,
- losses/(gains) on any curtailment or settlement of the plan.
O2 - Recognition of unrecognized past service cost
Unrecognized past benefi ts are recognized in income on a prorata basis with the corresponding obligation.
P - Non-recurring income and expenses
Non-recurring items correspond to income and expense not arising during the normal course of the Company's business activities. Major events likely to skew operating performance are recognized under this heading, which does not include any recurring operating expenses.
Non-recurring income and expenses include the following items:
- material non-recurring gains and losses on disposal: on property, plant and equipment, intangible assets, investments, other fi nancial assets and other assets;
- impairment losses recognized on investments, loans, goodwill and other assets;
- certain types of provision;
- reorganization and restructuring costs.
Q - Operating income
Operating income is shown before net fi nance costs, taxes and non-controlling interests.
Investment grants are shown as a deduction from the costs to which the grant relates.
R - Deferred taxes
Accounting restatements or consolidation adjustments may affect the results of the consolidated companies. Temporary differences are differences between the carrying amount of an asset or liability on the balance sheet and its tax base, which give rise to the calculation of deferred taxes.
In accordance with IAS 12, the Group discloses deferred taxes on the consolidated balance sheet separately from other assets and liabilities. Deferred tax assets are recognized on the balance sheet where it is more likely than not that they will be recovered in subsequent years. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are not discounted.
When assessing the Group's ability to recover these assets, the following items in particular are taken into consideration:
- projections of its future taxable income;
- its taxable income in previous years.
Deferred tax assets and liabilities are stated using the liability method for the balance sheet, i.e. using the tax rate that is expected to be applied in the fi scal year in which the asset will be realized or the liability settled, based on tax rates (and tax laws) enacted or substantively enacted at the balance sheet date, taking into account future tax rate increases or decreases.
The measurement of deferred tax assets and liabilities refl ects the tax consequences arising from the manner in which the entity expects at the balance sheet date to recover or to settle the carrying amount of these assets and liabilities.
S - Segment reporting
IFRS 8, which deals with segment reporting, defi nes an operating segment as a component of an entity:
- that engages in business activities from which it may earn revenues and incur expenses,
- whose operating results are reviewed regularly by the entity's chief operating decision-maker to make decisions about resources to be allocated to the segment and assess its performance, and
- for which discrete fi nancial information is available.
The internal reporting provided to the chief operating decisionmaker, i.e. the Management Board, and to the Supervisory Board, refl ects the management structure of the Mersen Group, which is based on the following segmentation:
Advanced Materials and Technologies: graphite equipment and other high-performance materials dedicated to extreme industrial environments.
Electrical Components and Technologies: systems and components contributing to the performance and protection of electrical equipment.
Pursuant to IFRS 8, the Group identifi es and presents operating segments based on the information provided internally to the Management Board.
T - Earnings per share
Basic and diluted earnings per share are shown both for total net income and net income from continuing operations.
Basic earnings per share are calculated by dividing net income for the period attributable to holders of ordinary shares by the weighted average number of ordinary shares in issue during the period.
For the calculation of diluted earnings per share, net income attributable to holders of ordinary shares and the weighted average number of shares outstanding are adjusted for the effects of all dilutive potential ordinary shares.
U - Equity-linked benefits granted to employees
In accordance with IFRS 2 - Share-based payment, stock purchase and subscription options and offerings reserved for employees related to shares in the Group are recognized at fair value at the grant date.
The value of stock purchase and subscription options depends notably on the exercise price, the probability of the conditions attached to exercise of the options being met, the life of the options, current price of the underlying shares, anticipated volatility of the share price, expected dividends and the risk-free interest rate over the life of the option. This value is recognized in staff costs on a straight-line basis over the vesting period of the rights with a direct equivalent entry in equity for plans settled in equity and in liabilities to employees for plans settled in cash.
V - Use of estimates
For the preparation of the consolidated fi nancial statements, the calculation of certain fi gures shown in the fi nancial statements requires that assumptions, estimates or assessments be made, particularly in relation to the calculation of provisions and impairment testing. These assumptions, estimates or assessments are prepared on the basis of the information available and the position at the balance sheet date. These estimates and assumptions are made based on past experience and various other factors. The current backdrop of a severe deterioration in the economic and fi nancial environment has made it hard to assess the business outlook. It is conceivable that actual fi gures will subsequently differ from the estimates and assumptions adopted.
Actual events occurring after the balance-sheet date may differ from the assumptions, estimates or assessments used.
Use of management estimates in the application of the Group's accounting standards
Mersen may make estimates and use assumptions affecting the carrying amount of assets and liabilities, income and expense, and information about underlying assets and liabilities. Future results are liable to diverge signifi cantly from these estimates.
The estimates and underlying assumptions are made based on past experience and other factors considered to be reasonable based on circumstances. They serve as the basis for the judgment exercised to determine the carrying amount of assets and liabilities, which cannot be obtained directly from other sources. Actual values may differ from estimated values.
Estimates and underlying assumptions are reviewed continuously. The effect of changes in accounting estimates is recognized during the period of the change if it affects only that period, or during the period of the change and subsequent periods if the latter are also affected by the change.
Note 5 relates to net assets held for sale and discontinued operations. The impairment in these assets has been calculated by comparing the carrying amount of these assets and liabilities with a best estimate of their realizable value.
Notes 2-F1, 2-I and 7 concern the testing of goodwill and other non-current assets for impairment. The Group's management carried out this testing based on the most reliable expectations of future business trends at the relevant units taking discount rates into account.
Notes 13 and 14 concerning provisions and employee benefi ts describe the provisions set aside by Mersen. To determine these provisions, the Group used the most reliable estimate of these obligations.
Note 22 concerning tax expense refl ects the Group's tax position, which is based for France and Germany on the Group's best estimate of trends in its future taxable income.
All these estimates are predicated on a structured process for collecting projections of future cash fl ows, providing for validation by line managers, as well as on expectations for market data based on external indicators and used in line with consistent and documented methods.
W – New standards and interpretations not yet applied
No new standard, amendment to a standard or interpretation had any impact on the consolidated fi nancial statements.
Note 3 Financial risk management
The Group is exposed to the following risks through its use of fi nancial instruments:
- liquidity risk;
- interest-rate risk;
- commodity risk;
- currency risk;
- credit risk.
This note discloses information about the Group's exposure to each of the aforementioned risk factors, its objectives, its risk measurement and management policy and procedures.
Quantitative information is also provided in other sections of the consolidated fi nancial statements.
Capital management is presented in Note 12.
Liquidity risk
Mersen has credit lines and confi rmed borrowings at its disposal representing a total amount of €488 million with an average maturity of 2.7 years, of which 57% was drawn down at June 30, 2012. The average maturity of drawn-down facilities was 3.6 years.
Mersen has fi ve major fi nancing agreements:
- A USD100 million private placement negotiated in November 2011 with a US investor, comprising one USD50 million tranche with a maturity of 10 years and one €37.2 million tranche with a maturity of 8 years, with all principal repayable on maturity. The interest paid to the investor carries a fi xed rate.
- A USD350 million loan arranged in July 2008 with a maturity of fi ve years, syndicated with an international pool of banks. The interest rates on the syndicated loan equal the interbank rate for the relevant foreign currency when drawings are made plus a fi xed credit margin. This loan was refi nanced in July 2012 in an amount of €215 million.
- A RMB490 million loan arranged in September 2010, with a maturity of three years, syndicated with an international pool of banks, intended to fi nance the Mersen group's operations in
China. Interest is payable at the PBOC (People's Bank of China) interest rate, with no credit margin, applicable when drawdowns are made. Under an extension granted in September 2011, the maturity of this loan was extended by a year, and so the loan will now mature in September 2014.
- A €40 million bond issue comprising bonds convertible into new and/or exchangeable for existing shares through attached warrants ("OBSAAR" bonds) fi nalized in November 2007 and repayable in one-third installments between 2012 and 2014, giving it an average life of six years (at issue). The interest rate paid is 3-month Euribor plus a fi xed margin. This margin is negative owing to the sale of the warrants;
- A USD85 million private placement negotiated in May 2003 with US investors, comprising one USD65 million tranche with a fi nal maturity of 10 years and one USD20 million tranche with a fi nal maturity of 12 years. The average duration of the private placement was initially around eight years because it is repayable in installments. The interest paid to investors carries a fi xed rate.
In July 2012, Mersen completed the refinancing of its USD350 million syndicated loan due to mature in July 2013 by arranging bank facilities totaling €215 million. As is customary, this syndicated loan is subject to compliance with certain fi nancial covenants. The interest rates on these facilities equal the interbank rate for the relevant foreign currency when drawings are made plus a fi xed credit margin.
These facilities consist of:
■ a syndicated loan in 2 tranches (€100 million and USD75 million), both with a 5-year maturity and with all principal repayable on maturity.
This syndicated loan was arranged with a pool of leading French and international banks.
■ bilateral loans totaling €55 million, with an average maturity of 4 years.
At end-July 2012, Mersen had €425 million of confi rmed fi nancing, of which around 50% was drawn down. The average maturity of drawn-down fi nancing is now 4.7 years.
Breakdown by maturity of credit lines and confirmed borrowings
| Maturities | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| In millions of euros | Amount | Amount drawn down at June 30, 2012 |
% drawn down at June 30, 2012 |
less than 1 year |
between 1 and 5 years |
over 5 years |
| Group syndicated loan | 278.0 | 77.7 | 28% | 0.0 | 278.0 | 0.0 |
| Confirmed credit lines, China | 64.5 | 52.5 | 81% | 5.9 | 58.6 | 0.0 |
| US private placements | 93.9 | 93.9 | 100% | 10.6 | 6.4 | 76.9 |
| OBSAAR bonds | 40.0 | 40.0 | 100% | 13.3 | 26.7 | 0.0 |
| Confirmed credit lines, UK | 7.9 | 7.9 | 100% | 4.7 | 1.3 | 1.9 |
| Other | 4.2 | 4.2 | 100% | 4.0 | 0.2 | 0.0 |
| TOTAL | 488.5 | 276.2 | 57% | AVERAGE MATURITY = 2.7 YEARS |
| In millions of euros | Amount | Maturities | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DRAW-DOWNS | drawn down at June 30, 2012 |
Expected cash flows 1-6 months |
6-12 months | Over 1 year | ||
| Group syndicated loan | 77.7 | 77.8 | 77.8 | |||
| Confirmed credit lines, China | 52.5 | 58.3 | 9.9 | 5.7 | 42.7 | |
| 2003 US private placements | 16.9 | 18.5 | 0.5 | 11.1 | 6.9 | |
| 2011 US private placements | 77.0 | 107.9 | 1.8 | 1.8 | 104.3 | |
| OBSAAR bonds | 40.0 | 41.5 | 13.9 | 0.3 | 27.3 | |
| Confirmed credit lines, UK | 7.9 | 8.9 | 2.4 | 2.4 | 4.1 | |
| Other | 4.2 | 4.5 | 0.2 | 4.2 | 0.1 | |
| TOTAL | 276.2 | 317.4 | 106.5 | 25.5 | 185.4 |
Breakdown by maturity of cash flows from credit line drawdowns and confirmed borrowings
Interest-rate risk
The interest-rate risk management policy is approved by the Group's Management Board based on the proposals submitted by Mersen's fi nance department and consists of establishing positions from time to time as a function of the direction of interest rates.
In May 2003, the Group purchased several interest-rate swaps covering an aggregate nominal amount of USD85 million to turn the interest payable on the US private placements into a fl oating rate. These swaps were sold again in April 2009, bringing the debt back to a fi xed rate.
When it was acquired by Mersen, Mersen Scotland Holytown had an interest rate swap with a nominal amount of GBP4 million that was arranged on January 15, 2008 to convert part of the interest on its confi rmed medium-term debt into a fi xed rate. Under this swap, the Company receives interest due to the lender and pays a fi xed rate of 5.38%. The repayment and duration profi le of the swap match those of the debt. At June 30, 2012, the nominal amount stood at GBP2.8 million.
In June 2009, the Group took out an interest-rate swap with an aggregate amount of €39 million to convert the interest due on the OBSAAR bonds into a fi xed rate. Under this swap, the Company receives the interest due to the lenders and pays a fi xed rate of 2.815%, with a repayment profi le and term equivalent to those of the OBSAAR bonds.
The 2011 US private placements are fi xed-rate, with an average coupon of 4.7%.
| Maturities | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| In millions of euros | Amount (in €) |
Interest rate received | Interest rate paid |
less than 1 year |
between 1 and 5 years |
over 5 years |
| EUR swap | 39.0 | 3-month EUR Libor - margin | 2.815% | 13.0 | 26.0 | 0.0 |
| GBP swap | 3.6 | 1-month GBP Libor + margin | 5.38% | 0.2 | 1.3 | 1.9 |
| In millions of euros | Maturities | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SWAP | MTM (a) | Expected cash flows |
less than 1 year |
between 1 and 5 years |
over 5 years |
|
| Assets | 0.0 | 0.5 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.0 | |
| Liabilities | (2.1) | (2.7) | (1.1) | (1.3) | (0.3) |
(a) Marked-to-market = adjusted to market value.
Commodity risk
Certain Group companies purchase raw materials or components comprising commodities, such as non-ferrous metals like copper, silver and zinc. Copper and silver are the two metals that account for a signifi cant volume of the Mersen Group's purchases (around €25 million). Different hedging techniques, such as index-linking of purchase prices, index-linking of selling prices and bank hedging, can be applied.
The commodity price risk-management policy is approved by the Group's Management Board based on proposals submitted by Mersen's fi nance and procurement departments and consists of establishing positions in commodity futures contracts or in zero-premium collars.
Around 97% of copper price exposure and silver price exposure can be covered through bank hedging.
At end-June 2012, around 45% of the hedgable tonnage of copper for full-year 2012 was hedged. As regards silver, around 60% of the hedgable tonnage was covered.
Impact of commodity hedging
| In millions of euros | 2012 balance sheet impact |
2012 income statement impact |
|---|---|---|
| Copper | 0.1 | 0.3 |
| Silver | (0.4) | 0.0 |
Currency risk
Fluctuations in the principal currencies used by the Group
| GBP | JPY | KRW | RMB | USD | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Average exchange rate from Jan. 1, 2011 through June 30, 2011(a) | 0.8680 | 114.91 | 1,544.56 | 9.1755 | 1.4046 |
| Closing exchange rate at June 30, 2011(b) | 0.9026 | 116.25 | 1543.19 | 9.3416 | 1.4453 |
| Average exchange rate from Jan. 1, 2012 through June 30, 2012(a) | 0.8225 | 103.37 | 1480.62 | 8.1918 | 1.2965 |
| Closing exchange rate at June 30, 2012(b) | 0.8068 | 100.13 | 1441.00 | 8.0011 | 1.2590 |
(a) Exchange rates used to convert the statement of cash flows and the income statement.
(b) Exchange rates used to translate the balance sheet.
The currency risk management policy is approved by the Group's Management Board based on proposals submitted by the Finance Department.
Based on a complete inventory of internal and external risks, it consists of entering into forward currency purchases with prime lending institutions.
The Group's usual business policy is to hedge currency risks as soon as orders are taken or to hedge an annual budget. The main currency risk derives from intra-Group sales transactions.
The Group's usual policy is to arrange borrowings in local currencies, except in special circumstances. Borrowings in foreign currencies arranged by the parent company match loans made in the same currencies to its subsidiaries.
For consolidation purposes, the income statement and statements of cash fl ows of foreign subsidiaries are translated into euros at the average exchange rate for the relevant period, while balance sheet items are translated at the closing rate. The impact of this currency translation may be material. The principal effect derives from the impact of fl uctuations in the US dollar exchange rate on the Group's equity and debt.
The Group's operating income before non-recurring items is exposed to exchange rate fl uctuations principally through the translation of earnings recorded by companies whose local currency is not the euro. The principal exposure is to the US dollar. A 10% decline in the value of the US dollar compared with the average recorded from January to June 2012 would have had a translation impact of negative €2.7 million on the Group's fi rsthalf operating income before non-recurring items. Conversely, a 10% decline in the US dollar compared with the exchange rate at end-June 2012 would have had a translation impact of negative €6.2 million on the Group's net debt at June 30, 2012.
Except in special cases, hedging is centralized by the parent company. It is carried out under strictly defi ned procedures. Hedges are valued as described below.
Recognition at end-June 2012 of currency transactions
| MTM (a) (stated in millions of euros) | June 30, 2012 | |
|---|---|---|
| Marking to market value of currency hedges | Equity | (0.2) |
| Other financial components of operating income | (0.1) |
(a) Marked-to-market = adjusted to market value.
Future cash flows on currency transactions recognized at June 30, 2012
| CURRENCY (in millions of euros) | MTM | Expected cash flows |
|---|---|---|
| Assets | 0.3 | 0.3 |
| Liabilities | (0.6) | (0.6) |
Currency hedges are adjusted as a function of the underlyings, and so there is no timing difference between their maturities.
Credit risk
The Group set up an insurance program in 2003 with commercial credit insurer Coface covering its principal companies in the US and France against the risk of non-payment for fi nancial or political reasons. Coverage varies between 0% and 90% of invoiced amounts depending on the customer.
During 2009, this program was extended to cover Germany, the United Kingdom and China (domestic customers).
Supplemental agreements to the policies covering the French receivables transferred during 2009 were signed in favor of the factor.
Note 4 Sale of the automobile and household electrical appliance brush division
The Group fi nalized the sale of its automobile and household electrical appliance brush and brushholder division on May 1, 2009.
The fi nancial results of activities held for sale and discontinued operations included operations temporarily maintained, but closely related to the sale and intended to be discontinued – notably under short-term service and outsourcing agreements.
Net income from operations sold or discontinued in the fi rst half of 2011 amounted to €1.6 million. This income arose mainly from the recognition of an earn-out payment under a performance clause included in the contract of sale.
The net loss from operations sold or discontinued in the fi rst half of 2012 amounted to €0.4 million.
Note 5 Business combinations
On January 3, 2012, the Group acquired Eldre, a family-owned US company with production sites in the USA (Rochester, New York) and France (Saint Sylvain d'Anjou). Eldre produces laminated busbars.
The purchase price and goodwill refl ect the strengthening of the Group's position as a key global partner in power electronics. Power electronics components are used in key Mersen growth markets like energy (solar, wind etc.), transportation (rail traction etc.) and electronics (drives, inverters etc.).
This acquisition fi ts with the Group's profi table growth strategy, which involves strengthening its leadership position in its expanding markets.
The net assets acquired in these transactions and related goodwill are presented below:
| Total acquisitions | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| In millions of euros | Net assets at acquisition date |
Fair value adjustments |
Allocation of the acquisition cost |
Fair value of net assets |
| Non-current assets | 5.5 | 2.9 | 0.0 | 8.4 |
| Cash acquired | 0.9 | 0.9 | ||
| Other assets | 9.4 | (0.2) | 0.0 | 9.2 |
| Non-current liabilities | (0.6) | (1.1) | 0.0 | (1.7) |
| Current liabilities | (4.2) | 0.0 | 0.0 | (4.2) |
| Net assets | 11.0 | 1.6 | 0.0 | 12.6 |
| Goodwill | 16.8 | |||
| Non-controlling interests | 0.0 | |||
| Acquisition price | 29.4 |
The allocation of goodwill is currently being assessed and will be disclosed in the full-year consolidated fi nancial statements.
The expected tax-deductible amount of goodwill relating to Eldre Corp. is \$14.9m, deductible over a 15-year period.
Revenue from acquired companies in the fi rst half of 2012 totaled €13.6 million and operating income was €1.3 million.
Eldre acquisition costs amounted to €1.3 million, and were recognized under non-recurring charges (€0.9 million in 2011 and €0.3 million in 2012).
Note 6 Goodwill
| In millions of euros | June 30, 2012 | Dec. 31, 2011 |
|---|---|---|
| Carrying amount at end of period | 264.0 | 260.8 |
| Acquisitions | 16.8 | 1.1 |
| Other movements | 0.1 | (1.8) |
| Translation adjustments | 3.8 | 3.9 |
| Carrying amount at end of period | 284.7 | 264.0 |
| Gross value at end of period | 284.7 | 264.0 |
| Total impairment losses at end of period | 0.0 | 0.0 |
A breakdown by cash-generating unit is shown in the following table:
| Dec. 31, 2011 | Movements during 2012 | June 30, 2012 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| In millions of euros | Carrying amount | Acquisitions | Other movements |
Cumulative translation adjustment |
Carrying amount |
| Anticorrosion Equipment | 69.1 | 1.5 | 70.6 | ||
| High-Temperature Applications | 93.0 | 0.8 | 93.8 | ||
| Electrical Applications | 12.8 | 0.1 | 12.9 | ||
| Electrical Protection | 89.1 | 16.8 | 1.5 | 107.4 | |
| TOTAL | 264.0 | 16.8 | 0.1 | 3.8 | 284.7 |
Acquisitions relate to the goodwill of Eldre S.A.S (France) and Eldre Corporation (USA) (see note 5).
Note 7 Asset impairment tests
Impairment tests were conducted for each of the cash-generating units when the balance sheet at December 31, 2011 was prepared.
Under IAS 36, tests were carried out on the basis of value in use determined using the discounted cash fl ow method. The key assumptions used were as follows:
- fi ve-year cash fl ow forecasts based on the 2012 budget and projections for the following four fi scal years. As regards the Anticorrosion Equipment CGU, it was assumed that margins would gradually rise back to historical levels after a year affected by deliveries of lower-margin equipment;
- a discount rate after tax of 8.5% for all the CGUs. There was no signifi cant evidence suggesting that different discount rates should be applied to the individual CGUs.
- a perpetual growth rate of 3.5% for the Anticorrosion Equipment CGU, 2% for the Electrical Applications CGU and 3% for the Electrical Protection and High-Temperature Applications CGUs. The 3.5% rate applied to the Anticorrosion Equipment CGU is the result of this CGU's business growth in the pharmaceuticals and renewable energies markets;
- a normalized tax rate of 34%.
The discount rate applied is an after-tax rate, since the application of a rate before tax has no impact on value in use calculations for the CGUs.
A sensitivity test was performed by decreasing in the fi rst instance the perpetual growth rate by 1 point and in the second instance by increasing the after-tax discount rate by 1 point compared with the estimate used for each of the CGUs. The sensitivity tests did not cast doubt on the results obtained.
A calculation of sensitivity to the discount rate was conducted such that the recoverable amount was equal to the carrying amount. The discount rates obtained are:
- around 19% for the Electrical Applications CGU;
- around 21% for the Electrical Protection CGU;
- around 11% for the Anticorrosion Equipment CGU; and
- and around 13% for the High-Temperature Applications CGU.
Given the economic background and movements in certain performance indicators, Mersen performed an impairment test on that date on the CGU showing the smallest differential between the recoverable amount and the carrying amount. No impairment loss was recognized after this test. Impairment testing will be carried out again at the 2012 year-end.
Note 8 Property, plant and equipment and intangible assets
| In millions of euros | Other intangible assets |
Land | Buildings | Plant, equipment and other |
Non-current assets in progress |
Total property, plant and equipment |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Carrying amount at January 1, 2011 | 37.1 | 29.5 | 51.1 | 172.5 | 34.1 | 287.2 |
| Acquisitions of non-current assets | 0.4 | 1.2 | 4.0 | 11.2 | 16.4 | |
| Retirements and disposals | (1.2) | (0.9) | (0.3) | (0.1) | (2.5) | |
| Depreciation and amortization | (1.1) | (0.1) | (5.4) | (12.3) | (17.8) | |
| Translation adjustments | (0.6) | (0.5) | (2.2) | (7.0) | (1.7) | (11.4) |
| Other movements | 3.3 | (0.9) | 4.7 | 5.5 | (9.3) | 0.0 |
| Carrying amount at June 30, 2011 | 39.1 | 26.8 | 48.5 | 162.4 | 34.2 | 271.9 |
| Gross value at June 30, 2011 | 65.8 | 27.5 | 98.5 | 428.5 | 34.2 | 588.7 |
| Total depreciation and amortization at June 30, 2011 | (26.7) | (0.7) | (50.0) | (266.1) | (316.8) | |
| Total impairment losses at June 30, 2011 | 0.0 | |||||
| Carrying amount at December 31, 2011 | 40.0 | 28.5 | 58.6 | 189.5 | 29.6 | 306.2 |
| Gross value at December 31, 2011 | 68.2 | 29.2 | 107.9 | 480.2 | 29.6 | 646.9 |
| Total depreciation and amortization at December 31, 2011 | (28.2) | (0.7) | (49.3) | (290.7) | (340.7) | |
| Total impairment losses at December 31, 2011 | 0.0 | |||||
| Carrying amount at January 1, 2012 | 40.0 | 28.5 | 58.6 | 189.5 | 29.6 | 306.2 |
| Acquisitions of non-current assets | 0.2 | 0.1 | 5.4 | 11.0 | 16.5 | |
| Retirements and disposals | (0.1) | (0.1) | ||||
| Depreciation and amortization | (0.7) | (1.6) | (17.5) | (19.1) | ||
| Translation adjustments | 0.2 | 0.1 | 1.1 | 3.3 | 0.5 | 5.0 |
| Impact of changes in the scope of consolidation | 0.0 | 1.0 | 3.7 | 3.5 | 8.2 | |
| Other movements | (0.3) | 0.6 | 7.3 | (7.7) | 0.2 | |
| CARRYING AMOUNT AT JUNE 30, 2012 | 39.4 | 29.6 | 62.5 | 191.4 | 33.4 | 316.9 |
| GROSS VALUE AT JUNE 30, 2012 | 68.7 | 30.3 | 113.9 | 501.4 | 33.4 | 679.0 |
| TOTAL DEPRECIATION AND AMORTIZATION AT JUNE 30, 2012 | (29.3) | (0.7) | (51.4) | (310.0) | (362.1) | |
| TOTAL IMPAIRMENT LOSSES AT JUNE 30, 2012 | 0.0 |
Spending on research (or for the research phase of an internal project) is expensed as incurred.
An intangible asset is recognized in respect of development costs resulting from development (or the development phase of an internal project) if and only if the Group can demonstrate that the developments satisfy the criteria in the standard.
At June 30, 2012, the Group had not identifi ed any development costs over the period satisfying these criteria.
Note 9 Investments
At period-end, the value of the unconsolidated shareholdings held by consolidated companies was as follows:
| In millions of euros | June 30, 2012 | Dec. 31, 2011 |
|---|---|---|
| Gross value | 9.7 | 8.8 |
| Impairment losses | (3.9) | (3.9) |
| CARRYING AMOUNT | 5.8 | 4.9 |
The increase in investments was the result of share issues by Mersen Russia and Mersen Maroc SARL.
Impairment losses recognized on investments at June 30, 2012 mainly concern Argentina and Greece.
The main investments in unconsolidated subsidiaries and associates are as follows:
| In millions of euros | Carrying | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Company name | % held | Gross value | amount |
| Fusetech | 50% | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| Mersen Argentina | 100% | 3.7 | 0.8 |
| Mersen Russia | 100% | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Mersen Maroc SARL | 100% | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Nortroll | 34% | 0.8 | 0.5 |
| GMI | 25% | 0.2 | 0.2 |
| Mersen Chile Ltd | 100% | 0.2 | 0.2 |
| Mersen Hellas SA | 100% | 0.8 | 0.1 |
| Investments in other companies | 0.3 | 0.3 | |
| TOTAL | 9.7 | 5.8 |
Note 10 Inventories
| In millions of euros | June 30, 2012 | Dec. 31, 2011 |
|---|---|---|
| Raw materials and other supplies | 101.1 | 91.6 |
| Work in progress | 72.9 | 74.0 |
| Finished goods | 35.5 | 31.8 |
| Gross carrying amount of inventories | 209.5 | 197.4 |
| Impairment losses | (11.0) | (8.7) |
| NET CARRYING AMOUNT OF INVENTORIES | 198.5 | 188.7 |
Inventories increased by €9.8 million in the fi rst half of 2012, with an increase of €4.9 million attributable to changes in the scope of consolidation. Currency effects had a positive effect of €2.7 million. On a like-for-like basis, inventories grew by €2.2 million or 1.2%.
Note 11 Trade receivables
| In millions of euros | June 30, 2012 | Dec. 31, 2011 |
|---|---|---|
| Gross trade receivables | 145.7 | 131.9 |
| Impairment losses | (4.4) | (3.9) |
| NET TRADE RECEIVABLES | 141.3 | 128.0 |
Net trade receivables increased by €13.3 million in the fi rst half of 2012, with an increase of €3.5 million attributable to changes in the scope of consolidation and a €2.1 million increase to currency effects. On a like-for-like basis, trade receivables grew by €7.7 million or 6%.
The movements related to impairment losses on trade receivables were as follows:
| In millions of euros | June 30, 2012 | Dec. 31, 2011 |
|---|---|---|
| Impairment losses at January 1 | (3.9) | (3.2) |
| Additions / write-backs during the period | (0.5) | (0.7) |
| IMPAIRMENT LOSSES AT END OF PERIOD | (4.4) | (3.9) |
Impairment in trade receivables is reviewed on a customer-by-customer basis by each unit depending on procedures in progress.
Note 12 Equity
Breakdown of the share capital
| In number of shares (unless otherwise stated) | Ordinary shares |
|---|---|
| Number of shares at January 1, 2012 | 20,288,354 |
| Issue of new shares (in millions of euros) | 0.0 |
| Number of shares at June 30, 2012 | 20,288,354 |
| Number of shares in issue and fully paid-up | 20,288,354 |
| Number of shares in issue and not fully paid-up | 0 |
| Par value of shares (€) | 2 |
| Entity's shares held by itself or by its subsidiaries and associates | 58,690 |
Capital management
The Company's share capital at June 30, 2012 amounted to €40,576,708, comprising 20,288,354 shares each with a par value of €2 and all belonging to the same category. The number of voting rights stood at 20,229,664, since shares held in treasury do not carry voting rights. There are no double voting rights.
To the best Company's knowledge, ownership of the share capital broke down as follows at December 31, 2011:
| ■ French institutional investors: | 47.3% |
|---|---|
| ■ Institutional investors from other countries: | 33.7% |
| ■ Individual shareholders: | 17.8% |
| ■ Employees: | 1.0% |
| ■ Treasury shares: | 0.2% |
Since December 31, 2011, certain shareholders have reported crossing the following disclosure thresholds:
February 24, 2012: Threadneedle (subsidiary of Ameriprise Financial) announced that its stake in Mersen's capital and voting rights had fallen below 5% and that it owned 1,006,994 shares on February 21, 2012, representing 4.963% of the capital and voting rights.
March 30, 2012: BNP Paribas Asset Management, in the name and on behalf of Cam Gestion, Fundquest France and Fortis Investments entities integrated within BNP Paribas Investment Partners, announced that it owned 415,244 shares on March 29, 2012, representing 2.0467% of the capital and voting rights.
May 8, 2012: Threadneedle (subsidiary of Ameriprise Financial) announced that its stake in Mersen's capital and voting rights had fallen below 4% and that it owned 773,226 shares on May 4, 2012, representing 3.81% of the capital and voting rights.
May 19, 2012: Threadneedle (subsidiary of Ameriprise Financial) announced that its stake in Mersen's capital and voting rights had fallen below 3% and that it owned 608,108 shares on May 18, 2012, representing 2.997% of the capital and voting rights.
At June 30, 2012, 58,690 shares or 0.2% of the share capital was held under a liquidity agreement approved by the Autorité des Marchés Financiers and entrusted to investment services provider Exane.
At June 30, 2012 the Group's employees owned 151,161 shares, representing 0.7% of the share capital, plus 507,857 stock options that, if exercised in full, would represent 2.5% of the current share capital. The stock option plans set up by the Group are based on an exercise price determined without any discount, since exercise of the options is subject to conditions linked to the Group's future performance. Using this method, the Group ensures that the interests of its managers are aligned with those of its shareholders.
The Group has also implemented a policy of allotting bonus shares. Defi nitive allotment of the shares is contingent upon the relevant benefi ciaries' presence on the Group's payroll at the end of the vesting period. Awards to members of the Management Board and employees that, in the Management Board's view, have made a signifi cant contribution to the Company's performance are subject to performance conditions. However, the Management Board has not set performance conditions for employees who, because of their role, contribute less directly to the Company's fi nancial results. At June 30, 2012, the number of bonus shares with the potential to be allotted defi nitively was 248,388, representing 1.2% of the current share capital.
Through the fourth resolution of the General Meeting of May 23, 2012, it was decided that shareholders would have the option of receiving all dividends in the form of new Mersen shares. On May 24, 2012, the Management Board set the price for new shares at €20.49. On July 2, 2012, the Management Board noted that at the end of the option period, 1,262,560 rights had been reinvested in new shares, and decided to issue 62,615 new shares with par value of €2 each.
Note 13 Provisions, contingent liabilities and other liabilities
| In millions of euros | June 30, 2012 | Dec. 31, 2011 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Non-current | Current | Non-current | Current | |
| - provision for restructuring | 0.3 | 1.8 | 0.4 | 2.9 |
| - provision for litigation | 0.2 | 0.2 | ||
| - other provisions | 0.2 | 0.6 | 0.1 | 2.1 |
| TOTAL | 0.7 | 2.6 | 0.5 | 5.0 |
Provisions amounted to €3.3 million at June 30, 2012 (€5.5 million at December 31, 2011) and primarily comprise a restructuring provision following the closure of the M.Schneider Allemagne site.
€1.5 million of the provision set aside in 2010 for decontamination as a result of the processes and products used by a manufacturing facility has been released after the risk was reassessed.
As regards litigation:
Some customers who opted out of the US class action lawsuit in 2009 initiated proceedings in the United Kingdom before the CAT (Competition Appeal Tribunal). Through these proceedings, the plaintiffs are claiming damages for losses that they allegedly suffered as a result of practices in the market for electric motor brushes and products for mechanical applications, against which the European Commission ruled in December 2003. Since the Group considers that there is no basis for this legal action, no provision was set aside.
In February 2011, the Deutsche Bahn group, together with other European rail companies, commenced legal action against Morgan, SGL, Schunk and Mersen in the UK's CAT. Through these proceedings, the plaintiffs are claiming damages for losses that they allegedly suffered as a result of practices in the market for electric motor brushes and products for mechanical applications, against which the European Commission ruled in December 2003. The Group has made submissions defending the claim. Legal proceedings are still in progress. The Group does not currently possess suffi cient information to estimate the risk linked to these proceedings, and no provision was thus set aside.
Other liabilities (€27.3 million at June 30, 2012) mainly included €20 million of dividends not yet paid to shareholders and amounts payable on property, plant and equipment.
No other material contingent liabilities were identified at end-June 2012.
Note 14 Employee benefi ts
The Mersen group's principal pension plans are defi ned benefi t plans and are located in the US (39% of obligations), the UK (24% of obligations), France (14% of obligations) and Germany (9% of obligations).
The Group's obligations were measured at December 31, 2011 with the assistance of independent actuaries in accordance with IAS 19. Obligations, assets covering those obligations and the charge recognized at June 30, 2012 were calculated by projecting forward the valuation at December 31, 2011.
The rates used for the principal countries are summarized below:
| 2011 | Discount rate | Return on plan assets |
Average rate of salary increases |
Inflation rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| France | 5.0% | 3.80% / 4.95% | 2.0% | 2.2% |
| Germany | 5.0% | Not applicable | 2.5% | 2.2% |
| United States | 5.0% | 6.75% | Not applicable | Not applicable |
| United Kingdom | 5.15% | 5.10% | 3.60% | 3.10% |
Reconciliation between assets and liabilities recognized
| In millions of euros | June 30, 2012 | Dec. 31, 2011 |
|---|---|---|
| Actuarial obligation | 132.4 | 126.3 |
| Fair value of plan assets | (68.7) | (64.4) |
| Unrecognized actuarial gains and losses | (24.7) | (23.8) |
| Unrecognized past service cost (rights not vested) | (1.7) | (2.5) |
| PROVISION BEFORE THE LIMIT ON ASSETS | 37.3 | 35.6 |
| Surplus management reserve | ||
| PROVISION AFTER THE LIMIT ON ASSETS | 37.3 | 35.6 |
Breakdown of the Group's net obligations at June 30, 2012 by geographical area
| In millions of euros | France | Germany | United States |
United Kingdom |
Rest of the world |
Total at June 30, 2012 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Actuarial obligation | 18.2 | 12.1 | 51.7 | 31.7 | 18.7 | 132.4 |
| Fair value of plan assets | (0.2) | 0.0 | (30.5) | (28.8) | (9.2) | (68.7) |
| Unrecognized actuarial gains and losses | (1.9) | (14.5) | (3.6) | (4.7) | (24.7) | |
| Unrecognized past service cost (rights not vested) | (1.7) | (1.7) | ||||
| Net amount recognized | 14.4 | 12.1 | 6.7 | (0.7) | 4.8 | 37.3 |
Change in the Group's obligations
| United | United | Rest of | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| In millions of euros | France | Germany | States | Kingdom | the world | Total |
| December 31, 2011 | 17.6 | 12.2 | 48.9 | 29.6 | 18.0 | 126.3 |
| Payments | (0.4) | (0.4) | (1.3) | 0.2 | (0.6) | (2.5) |
| Expense charged to income | 0.8 | 0.3 | 2.4 | 0.9 | 0.9 | 5.3 |
| Translation adjustment | 1.5 | 1.0 | 0.3 | 2.8 | ||
| Actuarial gains and losses | 0.2 | 0.1 | 0.3 | |||
| Other movements | 0.2 | 0.2 | ||||
| JUNE 30, 2012 | 18.2 | 12.1 | 51.7 | 31.7 | 18.7 | 132.4 |
Change in plan assets
| United | United | Rest of | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| In millions of euros | France | Germany | States | Kingdom | the world | Total |
| December 31, 2011 | 0.2 | 0.0 | 28.5 | 27.0 | 8.7 | 64.4 |
| Return on plan assets | 0.9 | 0.7 | 0.2 | 1.8 | ||
| Employer contribution | 0.3 | 0.1 | 0.2 | 0.6 | ||
| Employee contribution | 0.0 | |||||
| Payment of benefits | 0.0 | |||||
| Translation adjustment | 0.8 | 1.0 | 0.1 | 1.9 | ||
| Other movements | 0.0 | |||||
| JUNE 30, 2012 | 0.2 | 0.0 | 30.5 | 28.8 | 9.2 | 68.7 |
UK plan assets account for 42% of total plan assets, with 50% invested in equities and 46% in government bonds.
US plan assets account for 44% of total plan assets, with 48% invested in equities and 52% in bonds.
The charge recognized at June 30, 2012 in respect of these plans was €4.4 million, compared with €3.7 million at June 30, 2011. This charge breaks down as follows:
| In millions of euros | France | Germany | United States |
United Kingdom |
Rest of the world |
Total at June 30, 2012 |
Total at June 30, 2011 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current service cost | 0.4 | 0.1 | 1.3 | 0.1 | 0.5 | 2.4 | 2.0 |
| Interest cost | 0.4 | 0.2 | 1.1 | 0.8 | 0.4 | 2.9 | 2.8 |
| Expected return on plan assets | (1.0) | (0.7) | (0.2) | (1.9) | (1.9) | ||
| Amortization of actuarial gains and losses | 0.2 | 0.5 | 0.3 | 1.0 | 0.7 | ||
| Impact of the limit on assets | 0.0 | 0.1 | |||||
| Other movements | 0.0 | 0.0 | |||||
| TOTAL CHARGE FOR THE PERIOD | 1.0 | 0.3 | 1.9 | 0.2 | 1.0 | 4.4 | 3.7 |
Between December 31, 2011 and June 30, 2012, discount rates fell by around 1 percentage point. This did not have any impact on the amount of the provision, due to the corridor method.
At December 31, 2011, a decrease of 0.25 points in discount rates would have led to an increase of €4.1 million in the estimated actuarial obligation.
Note 15 Net debt
Analysis of total net debt at June 30, 2012
| In millions of euros | June 30, 2012 | Dec. 31, 2011 |
|---|---|---|
| Borrowings | 275.2 | 261.7 |
| Current financial liabilities | 9.2 | 5.3 |
| Bank overdrafts | 19.2 | 30.0 |
| TOTAL GROSS DEBT | 303.6 | 297.0 |
| Including use of confirmed credit lines | 276.2 | 260.2 |
| Current financial assets | (9.0) | (5.3) |
| Cash and cash equivalents | (39.4) | (52.2) |
| TOTAL NET DEBT | 255.2 | 239.5 |
Total consolidated net debt at June 30, 2012 was €255.2 million versus €239.5 million at year-end 2011.
Of the €303.6 million in total gross debt, €276.2 million stems from the use of the confi rmed loans and borrowings and the remainder chiefl y from use of the non-confi rmed lines (bank overdrafts and other lines).
Reconciliation between changes in net debt shown on the balance sheet and on the statement of cash flows
| In millions of euros | June 30, 2012 | June 30, 2011 |
|---|---|---|
| Debt at Dec. 31 of the prior period | 239.5 | 220.1 |
| Net cash from operating and investing activities after tax | (25.7) | (0.2) |
| Cash used by restructurings | 1.4 | 0.6 |
| Net cash (inflows)/outflows attributable to changes in the scope of consolidation | 26.9 | (0.9) |
| Net cash from operating and investing activities of continuing operations | 2.6 | (0.5) |
| Net cash from operating and investing activities of assets held for sale | ||
| and discontinued operations | 0.0 | 0.2 |
| Proceeds from issuance of new shares | 0.0 | (0.1) |
| Dividends paid | 0.1 | 0.3 |
| Interest payments | 6.3 | 4.6 |
| Translation adjustments and other | 4.8 | (7.7) |
| Impact of changes in the scope of consolidation | 0.7 | 15.1 |
| Other changes | 1.2 | (3.2) |
| DEBT AT JUNE 30 OF THE CURRENT PERIOD | 255.2 | 228.8 |
* In 2011, the amount reflects the change in debt on the buy-out of non-controlling interests in Mingrong Electrical Protection.
Financial covenants at June 30, 2012
In connection with its various confi rmed borrowings at Group level and in China, Mersen has to comply with a number of obligations, which are customary with this type of lending arrangement. Should it fail to comply with some of these obligations, the banks or investors (for the US private placements) may oblige Mersen to repay the relevant borrowings ahead of schedule. Under crossdefault clauses, early repayment of one signifi cant borrowing may oblige the Group to repay other borrowings immediately.
Mersen must comply with the following fi nancial covenants at June 30 and December 31 each year:
Financial covenants(a) (consolidated financial statements)
| In millions of euros | Net debt/ EBITDA |
Net debt/ equity |
EBITDA/ net interest expense |
|---|---|---|---|
| Covenant ratios | |||
| Group syndicated loan | < 3.35 | < 1.3 | - |
| 2003 US private placement | < 3.35 | < 1.3 | > 3 |
| 2011 US private placement (b) | < 3.35 | < 1.3 | > 3 |
| OBSAAR bonds | - | < 1.35 | - |
| Syndicated loan, China | < 1.35 | ||
| Actual ratios at June 30, 2012 | |||
| Group syndicated loan | 1.93 | 0.46 | |
| 2003 US private placement | 1.93 | 0.46 | 10.41 |
| 2011 US private placement | 1.98 | 0.46 | 10.19 |
| OBSAAR bonds | 0.47 | ||
| Syndicated loan, China | 0.46 | ||
| Actual ratios at December 31, 2011 | |||
| Group syndicated loan | 1.61 | 0.44 | |
| 2003 US private placement | 1.61 | 0.44 | 14.76 |
| 2011 US private placement | 1.66 | 0.44 | 14.36 |
| OBSAAR bonds | 0.45 | ||
| Syndicated loan, China | 0.44 |
(a) Method for calculating covenants: in line with accounting rules, in calculating the net debt shown in the financial statements, closing rates are used to calculate the euro-equivalent value of debt denominated in foreign currencies. Solely for the calculation of the net debt/EBITDA ratio, net debt has to be recalculated at the average €/USD exchange rate for the period in the event of a difference of over 5% between the average exchange rate and the closing rate. To calculate the covenants at June 30, the convention is that EBITDA or gross operating income is deemed to equal EBITDA reported for the first six months of the year multiplied by two.
(b) Following July 2012 committed borrowings refinancing, the financial covenant Net debt to EBITDA of the new Group syndicated loan, confirmed bilateral borrowings and the 2011 US private placement has been increased to 3.50.
The new Group syndicated loan and the 2011 US private placement benefit of Net debt to Equity and Net debt to EBITDA ratio level aligned.
The financial covenant Net debt to EBITDA of these two borrowings are aligned downward up to a minimum threshold of 3.35.
At June 30, 2012, there were no material borrowings or liabilities secured by assets or guaranteed by third parties.
Breakdown by currency of the drawdowns on credit lines and confirmed long- and medium-term borrowings including the short-term portion at June 30, 2012
Operating receivables and payables all mature in less than one year. A breakdown of borrowings by maturity is shown below.
| In millions of euros | Total | < 1 year | > 1 and < 5 years | > 5 years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Borrowings in USD | 71.7 | 10.6 | 21.4 | 39.7 |
| Borrowings in EUR | 108.5 | 17.4 | 53.8 | 37.3 |
| Borrowings in GBP | 43.5 | 4.6 | 37.0 | 1.9 |
| Borrowings in RMB | 52.5 | 5.9 | 46.6 | 0.0 |
| TOTAL | 276.2 | 38.5 | 158.8 | 78.9 |
| Amortization of issuance costs at the EIR(a) | (0.9) | |||
| Fair value of interest-rate derivatives | 0.4 | |||
| TOTAL | 275.7 |
(a) Effective interest rate.
Of the €158.8 million in debt due to mature in between one and fi ve years' time, €104.6 million had a maturity of over two years at June 30, 2012.
Analysis of total net debt at June 30, 2012
| By currency | % |
|---|---|
| EUR | 41.5 |
| USD | 26.5 |
| RMB | 18.3 |
| GBP | 15.0 |
| Other(a) | -1.3 |
| By interest rate | % |
|---|---|
| Fixed | 53.4 |
| Floating | 46.6 |
(a) Net financial surplus on other currencies
| In millions of euros | Total | o/w maturity < 5 years |
o/w maturity > 5 years |
|---|---|---|---|
| Debt | 303.6 | 224.7 | 78.9 |
| Financial assets | (48.4) | (48.4) | 0.0 |
| Net position before hedging | 255.2 | 176.3 | 78.9 |
| Fixed-rate debt | 136.4 | 57.5 | 78.9 |
| Net position after hedging | 118.8 | 118.8 | 0.0 |
Assuming Mersen's debt and exchange rates remain unchanged at their June 30, 2012 level and taking into account the swaps held in the portfolio, an increase of 100 basis points in fl oating interest rates would increase the Group's annual interest costs by around €1.2 million.
Note 16 Other non-recurring income and expenses
Other non-recurring income and expenses breaks down as follows:
| In millions of euros | 2012 First half | 2011 First half |
|---|---|---|
| Transfers/restructuring | (0.6) | (2.9) |
| Prior period losses of newly consolidated companies and acquisition costs | (0.5) | (0.2) |
| Other expenses | (1.3) | 1.1 |
| TOTAL | (2.4) | (2.0) |
In the fi rst half of 2012, non-recurring income and expenses resulted in a net charge of €2.4 million. Other expenses related mainly to debt write-offs and various disputes.
In the fi rst half of 2011, non-recurring income and expenses resulted in a net charge of €2.0 million. This primarily refl ected the cost of reorganizing the M.Schneider Allemagne production facilities and charges linked to acquisitions (prior-period losses and acquisition costs). Other non-recurring income and expenses mainly consisted of the sale of the sauna lighting business in Germany and the closure of the Czech subsidiary.
Note 17 Segment reporting
Operating income
| In millions of euros | Advanced Materials and Technologies (AMT) |
Electrical Components and Technologies (ECS) |
Total for continuing operations |
|||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sales | 2012 First half |
2011 First half |
2012 First half |
2011 First half |
2012 First half |
2011 First half |
| Sales to third parties | 184.3 | 189.4 | 242.8 | 230.0 | 427.1 | 419.4 |
| Breakdown of sales | 43.2% | 45.2% | 56.8% | 54.8% | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| Segment operating income before non-recurring items |
22.1 | 30.2 | 29.2 | 31.3 | 51.3 | 61.5 |
| Segment operating margin before non-recurring items* |
12.0% | 15.9% | 12.0% | 13.6% | ||
| Segment non-recurring income and expenses | (1.0) | (0.8) | (1.4) | (1.9) | (2.4) | (2.7) |
| Amortization of revalued intangible assets | (0.3) | (0.3) | (0.1) | (0.1) | (0.4) | (0.4) |
| Segment operating income | 20.8 | 29.1 | 27.7 | 29.3 | 48.5 | 58.4 |
| Segment operating margin* | 11.3% | 15.4% | 11.4% | 12.7% | ||
| EBITDA margin (1) | 19.4% | 22.5% | 14.5% | 16.4% | ||
| Recurring unallocated costs | (6.9) | (7.3) | ||||
| Non-recurring unallocated costs | 0.0 | 0.7 | ||||
| Operating income from continuing operations | 41.6 | 51.8 | ||||
| 9.7% | 12.3% | |||||
| Net finance costs | (4.8) | |||||
| Current and deferred income tax | (11.7) | (15.7) | ||||
| Net income from continuing operations | 23.3 | 31.3 |
* Segment operating margin = Operating income/Segment sales to third parties.
(1) The Group's EBITDA represents combined segment operating income before non-recurring items plus segment depreciation and amortization.
The Group's business activities do not experience signifi cant seasonal fl uctuations.
Breakdown of depreciation and amortization recognized by segment
| 2012 First half | 2011 First half | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| In millions of euros | AMT | ECS | Unallocated | Total | AMT | ECS | Unallocated | Total |
| TOTAL | (13.7) | (5.9) | (0.2) | (19.8) | (12.4) | (6.4) | (0.1) | (18.9) |
Segment assets
| Intra-Group transactions |
Total at | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| In millions of euros | AMT | ECS | TOTAL | eliminated | June 30, 2012 | |
| Non-current assets, net (excluding investments) | 428.8 | 219.4 | 648.2 | 648.2 | ||
| Inventories | 110.3 | 88.2 | 198.5 | 198.5 | ||
| Trade receivables | 90.2 | 99.8 | 190.0 | (48.7) | 141.3 | |
| Other receivables | 18.9 | 11.4 | 30.3 | (5.8) | 24.5 | |
| TOTAL SEGMENT ASSETS | 648.2 | 418.8 | 1067.0 | (54.5) | 1012.5 | |
| Investments | 5.8 | |||||
| Deferred tax assets | 27.6 | |||||
| Long-term portion of current tax assets | 2.7 | |||||
| Short-term portion of current tax assets | 3 | |||||
| Other current assets | 0 | |||||
| Current financial assets | 9 | |||||
| Current derivatives | 0.4 | |||||
| Financial assets | 0 | |||||
| Cash and cash equivalents | 39.4 | |||||
| TOTAL UNALLOCATED ASSETS 87.9 |
||||||
| TOTAL | 1100.4 |
Segment liabilities
| In millions of euros | AMT | ECS | TOTAL | Intra-Group transactions eliminated |
Total at June 30, 2012 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trade payables | 58.8 | 58.2 | 117.0 | (48.7) | 68.3 |
| Other payables and other liabilities | 59.4 | 47.8 | 107.2 | (5.8) | 101.4 |
| Non-current and current provisions | 0.6 | 2.7 | 3.3 | 3.3 | |
| Employee benefits | 11.0 | 26.3 | 37.3 | 37.3 | |
| TOTAL SEGMENT LIABILITIES | 129.8 | 135.0 | 264.8 | (54.5) | 210.3 |
| Deferred tax liabilities | 25.9 | ||||
| Borrowings | 275.2 | ||||
| Non-current derivatives | 2.1 | ||||
| Short-term portion of current tax liabilities | 3.9 | ||||
| Other current financial liabilities | 9.2 | ||||
| Current derivatives | 0.9 | ||||
| Current advances | 0.0 | ||||
| Bank overdrafts | 19.2 | ||||
| TOTAL UNALLOCATED LIABILITIES | 336.4 | ||||
| TOTAL | 546.7 |
Note 18 Staff costs and headcount
Group payroll costs (including social security contributions, provisions for pension obligations and retirement indemnities) came to €138 million in the fi rst half of 2012 compared with €123.1 million in the fi rst half of 2011.
On a like-for-like basis, staff costs - including the cost of temporary staff - increased by 3.7%.
Headcount of consolidated companies at end of period (continuing operations) by geographical area
| Geographical area | June 30, 2012 | % | June 30, 2011 | % |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| France | 1,666 | 24% | 1,534 | 22% |
| Rest of Europe (+Tunisia) | 1,141 | 16% | 1,319 | 18% |
| North America (+Mexico) | 2,102 | 30% | 2,064 | 29% |
| Asia | 1,820 | 26% | 1,957 | 28% |
| Rest of the world | 269 | 4% | 226 | 3% |
| TOTAL | 6,998 | 100% | 7,100 | 100% |
At comparable scope, period-end headcount fell by 405 and average headcount by around 270.
Note 19 Operating income
An analysis of operating income by category of income and expense is shown in the following table:
| In millions of euros | 2012 First half | 2011 First half |
|---|---|---|
| Product sales | 412.8 | 405.9 |
| Trading sales | 14.3 | 13.5 |
| TOTAL SALES | 427.1 | 419.4 |
| Other operating revenues | 4.4 | 4.8 |
| Cost of trading sales | (10.0) | (9.5) |
| Raw material costs | (109.8) | (113.6) |
| Costs on other operating revenues | (0.4) | (0.3) |
| Manufacturing costs | (75.9) | (71.0) |
| Salary costs | (136.4) | (119.7) |
| Employee incentives and profit-sharing | (1.6) | (3.4) |
| Other expenses | (32.0) | (31.4) |
| Financial components of operating income | (1.4) | (2.0) |
| Depreciation and amortization | (19.8) | (18.9) |
| Provisions | (2.8) | (2.8) |
| Gains/(losses) on asset disposals | 0.2 | 0.2 |
| OPERATING INCOME | 41.6 | 51.8 |
Note 20 Financial income and costs
| In millions of euros | 2012 First half | 2011 First half |
|---|---|---|
| Amortization of bond issuance costs | (0.2) | (0.2) |
| Interest paid on debt | (6.1) | (4.3) |
| Short-term financial expense | ||
| Commission on debt | (0.3) | (0.3) |
| Ineffective portion of interest-rate hedges | ||
| Interest income from bank deposits | ||
| Net finance costs | (6.6) | (4.8) |
The net fi nance costs shown above include the following items from assets and liabilities that are not shown at fair value through profi t or loss:
| Total interest income from financial assets | (6.6) | (4.8) |
|---|---|---|
| Total interest income from financial liabilities | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Net finance costs | (6.6) | (4.8) |
| Recognized directly in equity | ||
|---|---|---|
| In millions of euros | 2012 First half | 2011 First half |
| Change in fair value of currency hedges | 0.2 | 0.6 |
| Change in fair value of interest-rate hedges | (0.1) | 0.7 |
| Change in fair value of commodity hedges | (0.2) | (0.3) |
| Impact on changes recognized in equity | (0.1) | (0.4) |
| Net finance costs recognized directly in equity, net of tax | (0.2) | 0.6 |
Note 21 Income tax
The Group has:
- one consolidated tax group in France;
- one consolidated tax group in the United States;
- two consolidated tax groups in Germany;
The Group's effective tax rate on continuing operations came to 33% in the fi rst half of 2012, the same as in full-year 2011.
Analysis of income tax expense
| In millions of euros | 2012 First half |
|---|---|
| NET INCOME | 22.9 |
| Income tax expense/(benefit) on continuing operations | (11.7) |
| TOTAL INCOME TAX EXPENSE/(BENEFIT) | (11.7) |
| TAXABLE INCOME | 34.6 |
| Current tax rate in France | 36.1% |
| Theoretical tax benefit/(expense) (taxable income x current income tax rate in France) | (12.5) |
| Difference between income tax rate in France and other jurisdictions | (0.4) |
| Transactions qualifying for a reduced rate of taxation | |
| Permanent timing differences | (0.3) |
| Impact of limiting deferred tax assets | 2.0 |
| Other | (0.5) |
| ACTUAL INCOME TAX BENEFIT/(EXPENSE) RECOGNIZED | (11.7) |
The deferred tax assets and liabilities recognized on the balance sheet are as follows:
| In millions of euros | June 30, 2012 | Dec. 31, 2011 |
|---|---|---|
| Deferred tax assets | 27.5 | 25.7 |
| Deferred tax liabilities | (25.8) | (24.8) |
| Net position | 1.7 | 0.9 |
Deferred tax movements during the fi rst half of 2012 were as follows:
| In millions of euros* | Dec. 31, 2011 | Net income for the year |
Other | Cumulative translation |
adjustment June 30, 2012 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Employee benefit obligations | 8.1 | 0.3 | 0.1 | 8.5 | |
| Depreciation of non-current assets | (22.4) | (1.0) | (0.3) | (0.6) | (24.3) |
| Tax-regulated provisions | (3.7) | (0.1) | 0.6 | (3.2) | |
| Impact of tax losses | 23.3 | 2.2 | 0.1 | (0.2) | 25.4 |
| Impairment losses | 0.3 | (0.1) | 0.2 | ||
| Other | (4.7) | 0.1 | (0.3) | (4.9) | |
| DEFERRED TAX ON THE BALANCE SHEET – NET POSITION | 0.9 | 1.5 | 0.0 | (0.7) | 1.7 |
* (liability) / asset.
Deferred tax assets were recognized based on their recoverability. France, Germany, China and the US were the main tax jurisdictions affected.
Note 22 Earnings per share
Basic and diluted earnings per share are presented below:
| Continuing operations and assets held for sale | 2012 First half | 2011 First half |
|---|---|---|
| Numerator: Net income used to compute basic earnings per share (net income for the period in millions of euros) |
22.5 | 31.5 |
| Denominator: Weighted average number of ordinary shares used to compute basic earnings per share |
20,229,664 | 19,937,051 |
| Adjustment for dilutive potential ordinary shares: - unexercised options* | 756,245 | 827,201 |
| Weighted average number of ordinary shares used to compute diluted earnings per share | 20,985,909 | 20,764,252 |
| Basic earnings per share (€) | 1.11 | 1.58 |
| Diluted earnings per share (€) | 1.07 | 1.52 |
| Continuing operations | June 30, 2012 | 2011 First half |
|---|---|---|
| Numerator: Net income used to compute basic earnings per share (net income for the period in millions of euros) |
22.9 | 29.9 |
| Denominator: Weighted average number of ordinary shares | ||
| used to compute basic earnings per share | 20,229,664 | 19,937,051 |
| Adjustment for dilutive potential ordinary shares: - unexercised options* | 756,245 | 827,201 |
| Weighted average number of ordinary shares used to compute diluted earnings per share | 20,985,909 | 20,764,252 |
| Basic earnings per share (€) | 1.13 | 1.5 |
| Diluted earnings per share (€) | 1.09 | 1.44 |
* reduction related to the cancellation of 2007 stock options.
Note 23 Dividends
In the May 23, 2012 General Meeting, shareholders approved a dividend payment of €1 per share with respect to 2011. In the same meeting, a motion was passed to enable shareholders to choose between having the dividend paid in cash or shares. On July 2, 2012, the Management Board noted the option selected by shareholders to reinvest 1,262,560 rights in new shares. As a result, a €1.3 million capital increase (involving the issue of 62,615 new shares) was completed in July 2012 and the Group will pay cash dividends totaling €19 million.
Note 24 Leases
1 - Finance leases
Carrying amount by asset category
The Group has no fi nance leases.
2 - Operating leases (where the Group is the lessee)
Schedule of minimum payments
| In millions of euros | Total at June 30, 2012 |
< 1 year | > 1 year and < 5 years |
> 5 years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Minimum payments | 56.7 | 7.4 | 20.9 | 28.4 |
Minimum payments represent the amount of certain future property lease payments up until the expiration of the lease prior to any renewals. The leases do not contain any clause restricting debt or on dividend payments.
The largest item (€32.4 million) relates to rent payments at Mersen Xianda Shanghai's plant in China.
The €5.3 million increase in minimum lease payments by comparison with December 31, 2011 relates mainly to the renewal of leases and a currency translation effect.
Note 25 Related party disclosures
Mersen SA is a holding company that manages its investments in subsidiaries and affi liates and the Group's fi nancing activities, and charges subsidiaries for services related to the intangible assets and property, plant and equipment that it owns.
Mersen SA belongs to the Mersen group, which encompasses 93 consolidated and unconsolidated companies in 37 countries.
Transactions between the Group's consolidated companies are eliminated for consolidation purposes.
1 - Relations with unconsolidated subsidiaries and associates
Group sales to unconsolidated subsidiaries amounted to €7.8 million in the fi rst half of 2012, compared with €5.9 million in the fi rst half of 2011.
In the fi rst half of 2012, the management and administrative fees charged to unconsolidated subsidiaries by the Group (deducted from administrative costs) amounted to €0.1 million, the same as in full-year 2011.
The amounts receivable by the Group from its unconsolidated subsidiaries came to €5.7 million at June 30, 2012, while amounts payable amounted to €0.6 million.
Shareholders' advances made to unconsolidated subsidiaries by Mersen amounted to €0.7 million at June 30, 2012 versus €1.2 million at end-2011.
2 - Compensation paid to key management personnel (Management Board including the Chairman)
| In millions of euros | 2012 First half | 2011 First half |
|---|---|---|
| Salaries, bonuses, benefits in kind and attendance fees (a) | 0.9 | 2.2 |
| Top-up pension plan payments (b) | 0.1 | (0.6) |
| Other long-term employee benefits | ||
| TOTAL | 1.0 | 1.6 |
(a) 2011 figures take into account the departure of Ernest Totino and the arrival of four new members to the Management Board.
(b) Members of the Management Board have a contractual entitlement to top-up pension payments defined as follows: provided that the relevant person is still employed by the Group upon retirement, this regime guarantees top-up pension income of 10-20% of the basic reference salary depending on length of service during the final three years prior to retirement plus variable remuneration set at 50% of the maximum bonus. Actuarial obligations were measured at €1.3 million at June 30, 2012, compared with €1.2 million at December 31, 2011.
Members of the Management Board do not qualify for any other long-term employee benefi ts.
Should his appointment be terminated, the Chairman of the Group's Management Board will receive a severance payment of no more than 0.5 times the total gross compensation and benefi ts paid to him in respect of the thirty-six month period preceding termination, subject to the attainment of performance criteria.
If his term of offi ce as Chairman and his membership of the Management Board were terminated and, in return for a non-compete and non-solicitation undertaking made by Luc Themelin and lasting for a year following termination, monthly compensation equal to 50% of the last gross fi xed monthly remuneration he received immediately before termination of his offi ce will be paid.
Furthermore, the fi ve current members of the Management Board (including the Chairman of the Management Board) were awarded the following share-based payments:
■ Stock options:
| 2007 plan Tranche 11 | |
|---|---|
| Date of Board of Directors' meeting | July 25, 2007 |
| Total number of shares allotted | 94,188 |
| Subscription price | 53.10 |
| Start of exercise period | July 2011 |
| Expiration date | July 2017 |
| 2009 plan Tranche 12 | |
| Date of Board of Directors' meeting | January 22, 2009 |
| Total number of shares allotted | 171,518 |
| Subscription price | 17.53 |
| Start of exercise period | February 2013 |
| Expiration date | February 2019 |
■ Bonus share allotments:
| 2006 plan Tranche 2 | |
|---|---|
| Date of Board of Directors' meeting | June 28, 2006 |
| Total number of shares allotted | 1,497 |
| Reference price at the allotment date | 40.07 |
| Definitive allotment date (end of the vesting period) | July 1, 2008 |
| End of lock-up period | July 1, 2011 |
| 2011 plan Tranche 6 | |
|---|---|
| Date of Board of Directors' meeting | May 27, 2011 |
| Total number of shares allotted | 58,000 |
| Reference price at the allotment date | 35.34 |
| Definitive allotment date (end of the vesting period) | May 27, 2015 |
| End of lock-up period | May 28, 2015 |
In the General Meeting of May 23, 2012, the Management Board was authorized to re-allot 20,000 shares to the 2011 plan, after the allotment of those shares had been cancelled after introduction of the plan. On June 27, 2012, the Management Board - with the approval of the Supervisory Board - decided to re-allot these 20,000 shares according to the same performance conditions as set out in the 2011 plan, including 10,000 to Management Board members to refl ect the increase in the Management Board from two to fi ve members. The re-allotment of bonus shares gave rise to a new plan:
| 2012 plan Tranche 7 | |
|---|---|
| Date of Board of Directors' meeting | June 27, 2012 |
| Total number of shares allotted | 10,000 |
| Reference price at the allotment date | 18.22 |
| Definitive allotment date (end of the vesting period) | June 27, 2016 |
| End of lock-up period | June 28, 2016 |
All bonus share allotment plans are subject to performance conditions.
Note 26 Commitments and contingencies
A - Financial commitments and liabilities
| In millions of euros | June 30, 2012 | Dec. 31, 2011 |
|---|---|---|
| Commitments received | ||
| Guarantees and endorsements | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Other commitments received | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| TOTAL | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Commitments given | ||
| Collateralized debts and commitments | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Market guarantees | 18.3 | 21.1 |
| Payment guarantee on acquisitions | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Other guarantees | 23.8 | 23.7 |
| Other commitments given | 5.9 | 6.5 |
| TOTAL | 48.0 | 51.3 |
The above table summarizes the Group's commitments and contingencies.
Nature
The largest item, which amounted to €23.8 million, comprises other guarantees, which include a €16 million guarantee covering the maximum daily drawings by subsidiaries under the European cash pooling arrangements.
Maturity
Commitments and contingencies with a maturity of over one year amounted to €19.3 million. They include the €16 million linked to the cash pooling system, which remains in force for as long as the cash pooling agreements are in place. Market guarantees generally last for less than one year, except for a few market guarantees, the duration of which does not exceed fi ve years.
Internal control
Under the Group's internal control organization, Group companies are not authorized to enter into transactions giving rise to commitments and contingencies without obtaining the prior approval of the Group's Finance Department and, where appropriate, of the Management Board. Nonetheless, certain Group companies have the option of issuing market guarantees not exceeding €150,000 with a maturity of less than two years without prior authorization in the normal course of their business activities. These guarantees are listed in the documents completed by the companies as part of the accounts consolidation procedure.
As far as the Company is aware, no material commitments or contingencies under the accounting standards in force have been omitted.
B - Title retention clause
None
C – Individual Right to Training
In France, employees have an individual right to training. No provisions are set aside to cover these rights because the Group does not have the requisite information to assess them reliably.
Note 27 Subsequent events
Following the decision made at the Annual General Meeting of May 23, 2012, allowing shareholders to opt for payment of dividends in new shares and the Management Board's decision on July 2, 2012 in the light of shareholders' decision to reinvest 1,262,560 rights in new shares, the Group completed a €1.3 million capital increase (62,615 new shares) in July 2012 and will make a cash payment of €19 million in respect of the dividend.
In July 2012, Mersen completed the refinancing of its USD350 million syndicated loan due to mature in July 2013 by arranging bank facilities totaling €215 million.
Note 28 Approval of the fi nancial statements
The Group's consolidated fi nancial statements for the six months to June 30, 2012 were approved by the Management Board at its meeting on August 29, 2012.
Y STATUTORY AUDITORS' REPORT ON THE 2012 INTERIM FINANCIAL INFORMATION
To the Shareholders,
In compliance with the assignment entrusted to u s by your Annual General Meeting and in accordance with Article L.451-1-2 III of the French Monetary and Financial Code, we have conducted:
- the review of the accompanying condensed interim consolidated financial statements of Mersen SA for the period from January 1, 2012 to June 30, 2012,
- the verifi cation of the information contained in the interim management report.
The Management Board was responsible for preparing these condensed consolidated interim fi nancial statements. Our role is to express an opinion on these fi nancial statements based on our review.
Y I - Conclusion on the fi nancial statements
We conducted our review in accordance with the professional standards applicable in France. A review consists of making inquiries, primarily of persons responsible for fi nancial and accounting matters, and applying analytical and other review procedures. A review is substantially less in scope than an audit conducted in accordance with professional standards applicable in France and consequently does not enable us to obtain assurance that the fi nancial statements, taken as a whole, are free from material misstatements, as we would not become aware of all signifi cant matters that might be identifi ed in an audit. Accordingly, we do not express an audit opinion.
Based on our review, nothing has come to our attention that causes us to believe that the accompanying condensed interim consolidated fi nancial statements are not prepared, in all material respects, in accordance with IAS 34 – "Interim Financial Reporting" of the IFRSs, as adopted by the European Union.
Y II - Specifi c verifi cation
We have also verifi ed the information given in the interim management report on the condensed interim consolidated fi nancial statements subject to our review. We have no matters to report as to its fair presentation and its consistency with the condensed interim consolidated fi nancial statements.
Paris La Défense and Neuilly-sur-Seine, August 29, 2012
The Statutory auditors
Catherine Porta Joël Assayah Partner Partner
KPMG Audit ID Deloitte & Associés
4
Y STATEMENT OF THE OFFICER
I certify that, to the best of my knowledge, these condensed interim fi nancial statements have been prepared in accordance with the relevant accounting standards and give a true and fair value of the assets and liabilities, fi nancial position and the results of operations of the Company and of all the entities included in the consolidation, and that the attached interim business report presents a faithful picture of the major events that occurred during the six months of the interim period and their impact on the fi nancial statements, the principal transactions between related parties, as well as a description of the principal risks and principal uncertainties concerning the remaining six months of the fi nancial year.
Paris, August 29, 2012
Luc Themelin Chairman of the Managing Board
Immeuble La Fayette 2, place des Vosges 92400 Courbevoie La Défense 5 France