Skip to main content

AI assistant

Sign in to chat with this filing

The assistant answers questions, extracts KPIs, and summarises risk factors directly from the filing text.

LEGEND MINING LIMITED Capital/Financing Update 2011

May 11, 2011

65223_rns_2011-05-11_7a6c1384-938c-42cf-baa9-281835af45ff.pdf

Capital/Financing Update

Open in viewer

Opens in your device viewer

ASX Announcement

==> picture [481 x 5] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [481 x 5] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [481 x 5] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [481 x 5] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [481 x 4] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [481 x 5] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [481 x 5] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [481 x 5] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [481 x 5] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [481 x 5] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [481 x 4] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [481 x 4] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [481 x 5] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [481 x 5] intentionally omitted <==

ASX:LEG

12 May 2011

ASSAYS AND DRILLING CONFIRM MAGNETITE QUALITY AT CAMEROON PROJECT

  • Diamond drill assays return 98m @ 28.8% Fe and 33.78m @ 29.6% Fe.

  • Both intersections compare favourably with the previous metallurgical test sample, which returned a concentrate of 70.8% Fe with low impurities.

  • Melombo North drillholes intersect 94.85m and 58.42m of magnetite gneiss.

Legend Mining Ltd (“Legend”) is pleased to announce positive confirmatory assay results from two diamond drillholes (NESD011 and 022) from the Alpha and Hill 419 targets at the Company’s Ngovayang Project, West Africa, see Figure 1. A ten hole drilling programme has also recently been completed at the Melombo North target, where downhole intersections of magnetite gneiss up to 94.85m were made. A comprehensive technical discussion of the assays and drilling is included in the body of this report.

Legend Managing Director Mr Mark Wilson said “These assay results reconfirm that the magnetite found so far produces a high grade, low impurity concentrate at a relatively coarse grind. The fact we have empirical evidence that the Niton readings consistently undercall the assay values and that further good intercepts of magnetite have been found in the first pass reconnaissance drilling at Melombo North are all positive signs for the project.”

Legend’s 2011 drill programme is designed to cover multiple targets at the Ngovayang project. The drill rigs have now been mobilised to the Melombo West target, whilst drill pad preparation and access works are progressing at Melombo East and Plateau 1 and 2 respectively, see Figure 1.

==> picture [464 x 14] intentionally omitted <==

Polished magnetite gneiss core sample from drillhole NESD011

Page 1 of 7

==> picture [481 x 57] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text -----

ASX Announcement
----- End of picture text -----

==> picture [421 x 647] intentionally omitted <==

FIGURE 1: Ngovayang Project – Target Areas over Aeromagnetic Image (Analytical Signal of Total Magnetic Intensity)

Page 2 of 7

==> picture [481 x 57] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text -----

ASX Announcement
----- End of picture text -----

Technical Discussion

Hill 419 & Alpha Drill Results

As reported to the ASX on 14 March 2011, significant thicknesses of magnetite gneiss were intersected in the Eseka region at the Alpha and Hill 419 prospects, see Figure 2. Holes NESD011 (Alpha) and NESD022 (Hill 419) were assayed in their entirety at nominal 4m intervals, or to geological boundaries, and analysed for a full iron ore suite. The best intersections from both drillholes are summarised in Table 1 below.

Table 1: Summary of Magnetite Gneiss Intersections Table 1: Summary of Magnetite Gneiss Intersections Table 1: Summary of Magnetite Gneiss Intersections Table 1: Summary of Magnetite Gneiss Intersections Table 1: Summary of Magnetite Gneiss Intersections Table 1: Summary of Magnetite Gneiss Intersections Table 1: Summary of Magnetite Gneiss Intersections
Hole From To Interval Fe% **SiO2% ** **Al2O3% ** P% LOI%
NESD011 21.32 55.1 33.78 29.6 49.5 3.9 0.09 0.7
NESD022 0 98 98 28.8 48.5 4.6 0.10 1.0

Assay Method Fe, SiO2, Al2O3, P by fusion XRF – OMAC Laboratory, Ireland. LOI – Loss on Ignition at 1,000[0] C determined gravimetrically.

Full assay results for the two intersections are provided in Appendix 1. The individual iron assay results in Appendix 1 are encouraging, as they highlight the relatively homogeneous nature of the magnetite gneiss with respect to iron and magnetite content for both intersections.

Comparisons of laboratory XRF assays and Niton XRF analyser readings for the magnetite gneiss intervals in holes NESD011 and NESD022 are summarised below in Table 2.

Table 2: Laboratory XRF Table 2: Laboratory XRF Table 2: Laboratory XRF v Niton XRF Analyser Comparison v Niton XRF Analyser Comparison v Niton XRF Analyser Comparison
Hole From To Lab Fe% Niton Fe% Variance %
NESD011 21.32 55.1 29.6 24.1 -18.6
NESD022 0 98 28.8 22.2 -22.9

The results indicate that for magnetite gneiss the Niton XRF analyser underestimates the iron content by approximately 20%. (about 6% Fe content). It has also been noted that this “underestimate” reduces as the iron content increases, commonly reflecting a change from disseminated magnetite to a more massive form of iron.

As part of evaluating the magnetite gneiss host, Legend undertook preliminary metallurgical testwork on a representative 4m composite interval (46-50m) in NESD011 from the Alpha prospect (ASX announcement 14 March 2011). Results were encouraging with a high quality iron concentrate containing low impurities produced, and a coarse grind size indicated. The key results from this testwork are summarised below in Table 3.

Table 3: – Average DTR Product Grade for Alpha Metallurgical Sample

Table 3: – Average DTR Product Grade for Alpha Metallurgical Sample Table 3: – Average DTR Product Grade for Alpha Metallurgical Sample Table 3: – Average DTR Product Grade for Alpha Metallurgical Sample Table 3: – Average DTR Product Grade for Alpha Metallurgical Sample Table 3: – Average DTR Product Grade for Alpha Metallurgical Sample Table 3: – Average DTR Product Grade for Alpha Metallurgical Sample Table 3: – Average DTR Product Grade for Alpha Metallurgical Sample Table 3: – Average DTR Product Grade for Alpha Metallurgical Sample Table 3: – Average DTR Product Grade for Alpha Metallurgical Sample
Hole From To Interval Fe% **SiO2% ** **Al2O3% ** P% LOI%
NESD011 46 50 4 70.8 1.42 0.20 0.006 -3.30

Assay Method Fe, SiO2, Al2O3, P by fusion XRF – Amdel Limited, Perth. LOI – Loss on Ignition at 1,000[0] C determined gravimetrically.

The geological and geochemical character of the entire magnetite gneiss unit intersected in NESD011 and NESD022 is considered comparable to that of the metallurgical sample. This knowledge will now be used to assist the evaluation of future drilling at prospects in the southern region of the Ngovayang Project.

Page 3 of 7

==> picture [481 x 57] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text -----

ASX Announcement
----- End of picture text -----

==> picture [452 x 653] intentionally omitted <==

FIGURE 2: Eseka Region Diamond Drillhole Location over Topography

Page 4 of 7

==> picture [481 x 57] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text -----

ASX Announcement
----- End of picture text -----

Melombo North Drilling Programme

Following the completion of drilling in the Eseka region at Hill 419 in March, the drilling rig was mobilised to Melombo North to test several coincident magnetic and topographic highs. The Melombo North drilling has now been completed and comprised a total of 10 diamond drillholes, (NMELD001-010) for 946.01m. Details of the drilling are provided below in Table 4 and shown on Figure 3.

Table 4: Diamond Drillhole Details – Melombo North 4: Diamond Drillhole Details – Melombo North 4: Diamond Drillhole Details – Melombo North 4: Diamond Drillhole Details – Melombo North
Hole ID Easting Northing Dip/Azimuth Final Depth
NMELD001 685606 380977 -90/000 81.86
NMELD002 686012 381026 -90/000 148.38
NMELD003 686255 381008 -90/000 58.52
NMELD004 686846 382311 -90/000 83.88
NMELD005 686176 382055 -90/000 74.98
NMELD006 686703 381865 -90/000 38.82
NMELD007 686696 381864 -90/000 117.63
NMELD008 685517 381930 -90/000 137.98
NMELD009 684293 381153 -90/000 131.98
NMELD010 687213 381927 -90/000 71.98
Total 946.01

Drilling utilised an Ingetrol man portable diamond drilling rig – HQ and NQ core sizes. Co-ordinates: Universal Transverse Mercator WGS84, Zone 32, Northern Hemisphere.

==> picture [492 x 315] intentionally omitted <==

FIGURE 3: Melombo North Diamond Drillhole Location over Topography

Page 5 of 7

==> picture [481 x 57] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text -----

ASX Announcement
----- End of picture text -----

Magnetite gneiss of significant thicknesses were intersected in two holes at Melombo North, NMELD002 (94.85m) and NMELD007 (58.42m). Laboratory assays are not available for these holes, however average iron values from the Niton XRF analyser were 17.6% Fe and 22.8% Fe respectively.

Based on the comparison of laboratory XRF assays versus Niton XRF readings for magnetite gneiss discussed above, the average Niton values in holes NMELD002 (17.6% Fe) and NMELD007 (22.8% Fe) are considered likely to be under reporting and may actually range between 23-29%. These intervals have been submitted for laboratory analysis.

The Melombo North drilling has identified potentially significant thicknesses of magnetite gneiss, however due to the structural disruption evidenced in the magnetic signature and by fractured/broken ground, the continuity of the unit is unknown. Nine of the ten drillholes intersected “magnetic” rocks of varying intensity and thickness explaining the large magnetic response of the prospect. Magnetic modelling is being undertaken to assist interpretation and ultimately whether there is potential for sufficient tonnages of magnetite gneiss to be viable for mining.

The information in this announcement that relates to Exploration Results has been compiled by Mr Derek Waterfield, a Member of the Australian Institute of Geoscientists and a consultant to Legend Mining Limited. Mr Waterfield has sufficient relevant experience in the styles of mineralisation and types of deposit under consideration, and in the activity he is undertaking, to qualify as a Competent Person as defined in the 2004 Edition of the “Australian Code for Reporting of Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves” (the JORC Code), and consents to the inclusion of the information in the form and context in which it appears.

Visit www.legendmining.com.au for further information and announcements.

For more information:

Mr Mark Wilson Managing Director Legend Mining Limited Ph: (08) 9212 0600

Page 6 of 7

==> picture [481 x 57] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text -----

ASX Announcement
----- End of picture text -----

Appendix 1: Assay Results from NESD001 and NESD022

Hole From To Interval Fe% Al2O3% SiO2% P% LOI%
NESD011 0 4.62 4.62 15.7 16.1 47.7 0.027 9.92
NESD011 4.62 7.2 2.58 11.5 12.8 56.6 0.018 8.48
NESD011 7.2 11.2 4 25.9 10.3 45.5 0.040 6.78
NESD011 11.2 15.16 3.96 21.6 18.4 39.8 0.044 10.68
NESD011 15.16 18.16 3 16.3 22.3 41.1 0.022 12.95
NESD011 18.16 21.32 3.16 18.6 19.4 41.3 0.044 12.00
NESD011 21.32 25 3.68 34.9 3.8 44.4 0.066 2.35
NESD011 25 29 4 25.2 6.9 51.1 0.071 4.22
NESD011 29 31.5 2.5 30.9 2.3 49.8 0.093 -0.01
NESD011 31.5 34 2.5 28.2 4.5 49.5 0.093 -0.01
NESD011 34 38 4 29.2 3.8 50.1 0.106 -0.01
NESD011 38 42 4 28.8 3.4 51.0 0.097 -0.01
NESD011 42 46 4 30.0 3.1 49.8 0.111 -0.01
NESD011 46 50 4 29.4 3.3 50.4 0.097 -0.01
NESD011 50 55.1 5.1 29.6 3.5 49.5 0.080 -0.01
NESD011 55.1 60 4.9 7.7 13.1 65.7 0.035 0.62
NESD011 60 64 4 4.4 14.7 66.0 0.035 0.87
NESD011 64 68 4 1.0 16.3 72.1 0.013 0.95
NESD011 68 71.92 3.92 1.0 16.9 71.1 0.018 0.92
NESD022 0 4 4 23.9 12.0 45.8 0.058 7.29
NESD022 4 8 4 32.1 6.3 43.7 0.080 4.05
NESD022 8 12 4 34.9 2.9 44.3 0.088 2.20
NESD022 12 16 4 34.4 2.8 45.6 0.097 1.94
NESD022 16 20 4 35.3 3.3 43.8 0.102 1.89
NESD022 20 23.12 3.12 36.1 3.5 41.4 0.106 1.70
NESD022 23.12 28 4.88 34.9 2.8 43.3 0.084 1.20
NESD022 28 32 4 32.1 2.9 47.4 0.080 1.42
NESD022 32 36 4 32.4 2.3 46.7 0.075 0.56
NESD022 36 40 4 29.0 3.4 48.4 0.111 0.84
NESD022 40 44 4 28.5 3.6 48.0 0.133 0.00
NESD022 44 46.6 2.6 23.9 5.0 52.9 0.080 -0.01
NESD022 46.6 50 3.4 31.0 3.0 47.7 0.124 -0.01
NESD022 50 54 4 21.6 6.4 56.5 0.106 -0.01
NESD022 54 58 4 27.4 4.3 51.6 0.102 -0.01
NESD022 58 62 4 25.5 5.1 50.9 0.102 -0.01
NESD022 62 66 4 19.7 9.2 52.3 0.058 0.65
NESD022 66 70 4 25.7 4.6 52.3 0.093 -0.01
NESD022 70 74 4 23.9 6.0 51.6 0.075 -0.01
NESD022 74 78 4 27.9 4.0 50.5 0.115 -0.01
NESD022 78 82 4 22.6 6.3 53.4 0.115 -0.01
NESD022 82 86 4 24.8 4.8 52.8 0.128 0.04
NESD022 86 90 4 30.3 3.3 47.2 0.119 -0.01
NESD022 90 94 4 32.5 2.7 45.1 0.137 -0.01
NESD022 94 98 4 28.2 4.1 50.4 0.084 -0.01
NESD022 98 102.12 4.12 14.8 9.0 61.8 0.049 0.00
NESD022 102.12 106 3.88 8.8 13.5 52.9 0.080 0.89
NESD022 106 110 4 8.8 14.3 58.5 0.066 0.36
NESD022 110 114 4 11.4 13.4 54.6 0.173 0.02
NESD022 114 118 4 8.6 14.3 56.7 0.093 0.98
NESD022 118 122 4 7.4 14.6 58.7 0.062 1.06
NESD022 122 126 4 7.6 15.0 56.2 0.111 1.20
NESD022 126 128.88 2.88 1.0 14.4 73.9 0.009 1.10

Assay Method: Fe, SiO2, Al2O3, P by fusion XRF – OMAC Laboratory, Ireland. LOI – Loss on Ignition at 1,000[0] C determined gravimetrically.

Page 7 of 7