GREAT DIVIDE MINING LTD — Regulatory Filings 2023

Dec 19, 2023

ASX Release

20 December 2023

==> picture [157 x 80] intentionally omitted <==

Encouraging Gold assays from initial RC drilling at Yellow Jack

Great Divide Mining Ltd (the Company or GDM ) (ASX:GDM), a new Queensland gold, antimony and critical metals explorer, is pleased to announce initial RC drilling assays following its maiden drilling campaign at Yellow Jack last month.

Key Points:

• Assays from 17 RC drill holes have been received, which included significant gold intercepts of: o 5 m @ 1.97 g/t Au from 69 m depth in hole 23YJRC202

  • § including 1 m @ 4.19 g/t Au from 69 m depth

• 15 m @ 1.65 g/t Au from 75 m depth in hole 23YJRC204

  • § including 4 m @ 2.59 g/t Au from 75 m depth

• 5 m @ 2.45 g/t Au from 155 m depth in hole 23YJRC213

• 6 m @ 3.25 g/t Au from 66 m depth in hole 23YJRC216

• Initial results indicate that the gold mineralisation is open along strike and at depth

• A full 3D interpretation will be completed over the coming weeks, after the assays for the final three drill holes are received

Commenting on the initial assay results, Chief Executive Officer of Great Divide Mining, Justin Haines, said:

“We are pleased to report assays from our initial drilling campaign at Yellow Jack – representing not only our first results at Yellow Jack, but our first drilling campaign since listing on ASX in August 2023.

“The results to date are encouraging, with two of the widest intersections being in the far Northern end of the Project (15 m @ 1.65 g/t Au in hole 23YJRC204 and 6 m @ 3.25 g/t Au in hole 23YJRC216) indicating the Gold mineralisation may both widen and extend further to the North than previously thought.

“Further assays are due early next year from our diamond drilling at Yellow Jack. Once we receive those results we will be better placed to consider an upside revision of our previously announced JORC Mineral Resource Estimate of over 51,000 oz contained Gold[1] as well as look towards a mining lease application early next year.”

The Yelow Jack drilling campaign included 20 holes totalling 1,820m of Reverse Circulation (RC) drilling and 250m of Diamond Drilling, for a total of 2,070m drilled. The drilling campaign was designed to confirm historical drilling results and to test resource extension both at depth and along strike, with historical drilling having been limited to less than 70m vertical depth. This campaign follows the recently announced Mineral Resource Estimate at Yellow Jack of 1.84 Mt at 0.86 g/t Gold (Au) for 51,100 oz contained Au above a 0.5 g/t Au cut-off grade[2] .

Significant gold intercepts from the first 17 RC drill holes are shown below in Table 1. The gold mineralisation is largely associated with quartz veining within fault structures hosted by sedimentary host rocks.

The final assays for the remaining three diamond drill holes are due back over the coming weeks. After this, a full 3D interpretation will be completed.

1 Refer to note “Yellow Jack Mineral Resource Estimate” below.

2 Refer to note “Yellow Jack Mineral Resource Estimate” below.

Great Divide Mining Ltd ACN 655 868 803

GPO Box 154 Brisbane QLD 4001

greatdividemining.com.au

==> picture [157 x 80] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [325 x 331] intentionally omitted <==

Figure 1: Location map of the Yellow Jack Project, Queensland

Table 1: Yellow Jack Significant Gold Intercepts > 1 g/t Au for first 17 RC drill hole (0.5 g/t Au cut-off grade).

Hole	m	To m	Interval m	Weighted Average Grade Au g/t
23YJRC200	9	12	3	1.42
23YJRC201	12	15	3	1.07
23YJRC202	14	15	1	1.58
23YJRC202	69	74	5	1.97
23YJRC202	69	70	1	4.19
23YJRC203	14	16	2	1.11
23YJRC203	36	37	2	1.43
23YJRC204	75	90	15	1.65
23YJRC204	75	79	4	2.59
23YJRC204	86	87	1	3.88
23YJRC210	110	112	2	1.12
23YJRC211	103	104	1	1.05
23YJRC211	132	134	2	2.24
23YJRC213	41	42	1	1.52
23YJRC213	155	160	5	2.45
23YJRC214	62	65	3	2.02

2

==> picture [157 x 80] intentionally omitted <==

23YJRC214	75	78	3	1.6
23YJRC215	21	23	2	1.26
23YJRC215	57	59	2	1.7
23YJRC216	66	72	6	3.25
23YJRC216	74	77	3	1.31

A drill hole map is included in Appendix A and drill collar details are included in Appendix B .

ASX release authorised by the Board of Great Divide Mining Ltd.

For further information: Investors and Media: Justin Haines Reign Advisory Chief Executive Officer e: gdm@reignadvisory.com e: justin.haines@greatdividemining.com.au p: +61 2 9174 5388

About Great Divide Mining Ltd (ASX: GDM)

Great Divide Mining is a Gold, Antimony and critical metals explorer in Queensland, with four projects across twelve tenements (including one in application). GDM’s focus is on developing assets within areas of historical mining and past exploration with nearby infrastructure, thus enabling rapid development. Through a staged exploration and development programme, GDM intends to generate cash flow from its initial projects to support further exploration across its portfolio of highly prospective tenements.

Yellow Jack Mineral Resource Estimate

The Company confirms that with respect to the Yellow Jack Mineral Resource Estimate (MRE), released in GDM’s ASX Annoucement on 4 October 2023, that it is not aware of any new information or data which materially affects the information included in the relevant market announcement, and in relation to estimates of mineral resources or ore reserves and exploration targets, all material assumptions and technical parameters underpinning the estimates in the relevant market announcements continue to apply and have not materially changed.

Competent Persons Statement

The information in this announcement that relates to Exploration Results based on information compiled by Mr Justin Haines who is CEO of Great Divide Mining Ltd and a Fellow of the Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy (AusIMM) and a Member of the Australian Institute of Geoscientists (AIG). Mr Haines has sufficient experience that is relevant to the styles of mineralisation and types of deposit under consideration, and to the activity that is being undertaking to qualify as a Competent Person, as defined in the 2012 Edition of the ‘Australasian Code for Reporting of Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves.’ Mr Haines is an employee of GDM, and consents to the inclusion in this report of the matters based on his information in the form and context in which it appears

Forward-Looking Statements

This announcement may contain forward-looking information about the Company and its operations. In certain cases, forward-looking information may be identified by such terms as "anticipates", "believes", “should”, "could", "estimates", “target”, “likely”, “plan”, "expects", "may", “intend”, "shall", "will", or "would". These statements are based on information currently available to the Company and the Company provides no assurance that actual results will meet management's expectations. Forward-looking statements are subject to risk factors associated with the Company’s business, many of which are beyond the control of the Company. It is believed that the expectations reflected in these statements are reasonable, but they may be affected by a variety of variables and changes in underlying assumptions which could cause actual results or trends to differ materially from those expressed or implied in such statements. There can be no assurance that actual outcomes will not differ materially from these statements.

3

==> picture [157 x 80] intentionally omitted <==

Appendix A: Yellow Jack drill hole map

==> picture [595 x 635] intentionally omitted <==

4

==> picture [157 x 80] intentionally omitted <==

Appendix B: Yellow Jack drill collar, survey and observed mineralisation information

Hole	Drill Type	GPS Collar GDA94	GPS Collar GDA94	(m)	Hole Azim (Mag)	Hole Dip (deg)	Total Depth (m)	Depth to Oxidation (m)	Mineralisation Comments
		East	North	RL
23YJRC200	RC	273866	7861058	627	113	-60	94	40	No significant mineralisation observed
23YJRC201	RC	273831	7861080	618	113	-60	94	72	Minor quartz veining observed 16-72m
23YJRC202	RC	273793	7861099	612	113	-60	94	53	Minor quartz veining observed 55-62m, 68-73m
23YJRC203	RC	273974	7861364	616	113	-60	64	>64	Minor quartz veining observed 14-17, 25-37, 40-41m
23YJRC204	RC	273939	7861380	618	113	-60	94	92	Minor quartz veining observed 32-43, 61-79, 85-89m
23YJRC205	RC	273525	7860183	624	113	-60	70	65	No significant mineralisation observed
23YJRC206	RC	273493	7860200	628	113	-60	124	89	No significant mineralisation observed
23YJRC207	RC	273453	7860216	636	113	-60	130	92	Quartz veining observed 3% 39-40m, 8% 109-110m, 5% 117-118m
23YJRC208	RC	273567	7860248	622	113	-60	124	96	Quartz veining observed 3% 26-31m, 1% 31-33m and 42-45m, 1% 70-71m, 8% 75- 77m, 3% 99-100m, 2% 102-104m
23YJRC209	RC	273529	7860268	619	113	-60	118	90	Quartz veining observed 10% 59-60m, 1% 60-69m, 2% 69-70m, 5% 72-73m, 3% 81- 83m, 1% 96-97m and 101-107m
23YJRC210	RC	273496	7860288	618	113	-60	130	85	Minor quartz veining observed 9-34m, 2 % 30-34m, 2% 107-110m, 2-5% 110-119m
23YJRC211	RC	273551	7860410	623	113	-60	154	132	Quartz veining observed 2-3% 31-41m, 2-5% 65-80m, 2-3% 88-94m, 10% 103-104m, 3% 107-109m, 8% 119-121m, 2% 121-127m.
23YJRC212	RC	273696	7860421	612	113	-60	64	>64	Quartz veining observed 3% 4-6m
23YJRC213	RC	273598	7860613	619	113	-60	184	133	Quartz veining observed 8% 22-25m, 2-5% 26-29m, 10% 41-42m, 2% 52-55, 59-62, 66-68, 76-77, 160-165m, 5% 154-160m
23YJRC214	RC	273584	7860383	627	113	-60	94	>94	Quartz veining observed 10% 56-57m, 60% 57-58m, 5-10% 58-63m, 80% 63-65m, 10% 75-78m
23YJRC215	RC	273741	7860664	615	113	-60	94	>94	Quartz veining observed 10% 20-21m, 5% 21-23m, 5% 57-61m
23YJRC216	RC	273906	7861306	612	113	-60	94	77	Minor quartz veining observed 68-71m
23YJDD217	DD-HQ3	273871	7861230	622	113	-60	86.2	62	Quartz veining observed 43.17-43.24m, 43.89-43.93m, 54.82-54.96m, 61.91- 61.97m, minor veins 70.7-75.12m, vaining within shear zones
23YJDD218	DD-HQ3	273743	7860843	608	113	-60	81.9	60.95	Minor quartz vein 7.82-7.85m, 36.27-36.52m, 3% veins 53.76-54.73m
23YJDD219	DD-HQ3	273623	7860457	626	113	-60	81.9	> 81.9	Quartz veining observed throughout 25.57-39.9m

Great Divide Mining Ltd

ACN 655 868 803

GPO Box 154 Brisbane QLD 4001

greatdividemining.com.au

==> picture [157 x 80] intentionally omitted <==

Appendix C: JORC Table 1

Section 1 Sampling Techniques and Data

(Criteria in this section apply to all succeeding sections.)

Criteria	JORC Code explanation	JORC Code explanation	Commentary	Commentary
Sampling	•	Nature and quality of sampling (eg cut	•	GDM completed 20 drill holes totalling 1,820m of Reverse Circulation (RC) drilling and
techniques		channels, random chips, or specific specialised industry standard measurement tools appropriate to the minerals under investigation, such as down hole gamma sondes, or handheld XRF instruments, etc). These examples should not be taken	• •	250m of Diamond Drilling, for a total of 2,070m drilled. RC drill holes were sampled as individual, 1 m length samples from the drill rig cyclone and sample splitter. Individual 1 metre samples were collected as a ~10% split using a splitter mounted below the cyclone, with the remainder of the RC chips collected into large green plastic bags. Four (4) metre RC composite samples were taken in zones that were logged as having
		as limiting the broad meaning of		no visual mineralisation, at the geologist’s discretion. The composite samples were taken
		sampling.		using a sample spear, by compositing together RC chips from the green plastic bags.
	• •	Include reference to measures taken to ensure sample representivity and the appropriate calibration of any measurement tools or systems used. Aspects of the determination of mineralisation that are Material to the	• •	Individual RC samples were collected in numbered calico sample bags and grouped into large white ployweave bags for dispatch (approximately five per bag). These were then taken by GDM to ALS laboratory, Townsville. Diamond core samples were collected using a diamond core cutter on site. Quarter core samples 1 m in length were placed into numbered calico bags and despatched to the
		Public Report.		Laboratory.
	•	In cases where ‘industry standard’	•	No drilled intervals were left unsampled.
		work has been done this would be	•	Back-up samples for every 1 m drill interval were also collected and securely stored on
		relatively simple (eg ‘reverse		site.
		circulation drilling was used to obtain
		1 m samples from which 3 kg was
		pulverised to produce a 30 g charge
		for fire assay’). In other cases more
		explanation may be required, such as
		where there is coarse gold that has
		inherent sampling problems. Unusual
		commodities or mineralisation types
		(eg submarine nodules) may warrant
		disclosure of detailed information.
Drilling	•	Drill type (eg core, reverse circulation,	•	Eagle Drilling Contractors completed the drilling program for GDM.
techniques		open-hole hammer, rotary air blast, auger, Bangka, sonic, etc) and details (eg core diameter, triple or standard	• •	Reverse circulation drilling utilising a 5.5inch RC face-sampling hammer. Diamond core drilling utilised triple tube HQ3 size coring methods.

6

Criteria	JORC Code explanation		Commentary
		tube, depth of diamond tails, face- sampling bit or other type, whether core is oriented and if so, by what	• •	PVC casing was used at each hole to protect the collar. Drilling methods and equipment were to best industry standard.
		_method, etc). _
Drill sample	•	Method of recording and assessing	•	For RC drilling, recovery can be monitored by observing the consistency of drill chip
recovery	• •	core and chip sample recoveries and results assessed. Measures taken to maximise sample recovery and ensure representative nature of the samples. Whether a relationship exists between sample recovery and grade and	• •	amounts collected for each 1 m sample. RC samples were weighed at the rig and recorded. No significant loss of recovery was observed in any 1 m intervals Samples were largely dry, with only a few samples being moist. No significant zones of wet RC samples were encountered impacting the recovery. HQ core samples were measured and photographed in the split at the rig. The depths and recoveries were recorded.
		whether sample bias may have	•	No significant core loss intervals were recorded. The overall recovery for core drilling
		occurred due to preferential loss/gain		averaged >90%.
		of fine/coarse material.	•	Sample assays are awaited.
Logging	•	Whether core and chip samples have	•	Geological logs were completed for all drill holes by an experienced geologist.
	•	been geologically and geotechnically logged to a level of detail to support appropriate Mineral Resource estimation, mining studies and metallurgical studies. Whether logging is qualitative or quantitative in nature. Core (or	• • •	The drill core and chip samples has been geologically and geotechnically logged to a level to support appropriate mineral resource estimation, mining studies and metallurgical studies. The lithology, weathering, oxidation, colour, grainsize, texture, alteration, veining, structure and mineralisation were recorded in digital spreadsheets at the time of drilling. Core is logged both qualitatively and quantitatively.
		costean, channel, etc) photography.	•	Logs are largely qualitative in nature using company logging codes.
	•	The total length and percentage of the relevant intersections logged.	• •	Logging of mineralisation and quartz veining is largely quantitative. Core and chip tray photography was completed on site.
Sub-sampling	•	If core, whether cut or sawn and	•	The entire drilling program was sampled using 1m intervals.
techniques and sample preparation	• •	whether quarter, half or all core taken. If non-core, whether riffled, tube sampled, rotary split, etc and whether sampled wet or dry. For all sample types, the nature,	• •	Quarter core has been sampled by cutting using a diamond saw 4 x 1m speared composites were created of selected low-potential mineralisation zones at the geologist’s direction. The aim is to return the 1m individual samples to the Laboratory, if any 4 m composite samples are anomalous..
		quality and appropriateness of the
		sample preparation technique.
	•	Quality control procedures adopted
		for all sub-sampling stages to
		maximise representivity of samples.
	•	Measures taken to ensure that the
		sampling is representative of the in

7

Criteria	JORC Code explanation		Commentary
		situ material collected, including for
		instance results for field
		duplicate/second-half sampling.
	•	Whether sample sizes are appropriate
		to the grain size of the material being
		sampled.
Quality of	•	The nature, quality and	•Assays have been received for the 17 RC drill holes.
assay data and laboratory tests	•	appropriateness of the assaying and laboratory procedures used and whether the technique is considered partial or total. For geophysical tools, spectrometers, handheld XRF instruments, etc, the	•Laboratory QAQC reports are assessed on receipt. •Samples were dried, crushed and pulverised by the Laboratory. •Samples were then assayed using a 50g fire assay for gold with AAS finish, which is considered appropriate for this style of mineralisation. Fire assay is considered total assay for gold. All other elements will be assayed using ICP-OES (mixed acid digest).
		parameters used in determining the	•QAQC samples were included into the sample sequence at regular intervals. One in 20
		analysis including instrument make	samples is a duplicate, one in 40 samples is a blank and one in 40 are Certified
		and model, reading times, calibrations factors applied and their derivation, etc.	Reference Materials (i.e. standards). •QAQC sample results received to date are within normal tolerance limits.
	•	Nature of quality control procedures
		adopted (eg standards, blanks,
		duplicates, external laboratory
		checks) and whether acceptable
		levels of accuracy (ie lack of bias) and
		precision have been established.
Verification of	•	The verification of significant	•20 drill holes were drilled and all data recorded in the field has been entered into a digital
sampling and		intersections by either independent or	database.
assaying	• •	alternative company personnel. The use of twinned holes. Documentation of primary data, data entry procedures, data verification,	•Digital drill data has been safely stored on GDM’s server. •6 holes were twins of historical drill holes, (3 cored and 3 RC). New assay results of the twinned holes will be compared to the original assay results of the historical drill hole.
		data storage (physical and electronic)
		protocols.
	•	Discuss any adjustment to assay
		data.
Location of	•	Accuracy and quality of surveys used	•All collar locations were initially recorded with a handheld Garmin GPS with a +/- 3m to
data points	• •	to locate drill holes (collar and down- hole surveys), trenches, mine workings and other locations used in Mineral Resource estimation. Specification of the grid system used. Quality and adequacy of topographic	5m accuracy. •All collar locations will be re-surveyed using a more accurate DGPS in the coming weeks. •All coordinates were recorded as GDA94 Zone 55. •A table of drill hole collar details is included in the announcement.

8

Criteria	JORC Code explanation		Commentary
		control.
Data spacing	•	Data spacing for reporting of	•Due to the exploratory nature of the drilling, spacing of holes currently varies between
and		Exploration Results.	40m and 160m (see drill hole map in the announcement).
distribution	•	Whether the data spacing and
		distribution is sufficient to establish
		the degree of geological and grade
		continuity appropriate for the Mineral
		Resource and Ore Reserve
		estimation procedure(s) and
		classifications applied.
	•	Whether sample compositing has
		been applied.
Orientation of	•	Whether the orientation of sampling	•Drill holes were oriented roughly perpendicular to the interpreted vein orientation to limit
data in relation to geological structure		achieves unbiased sampling of possible structures and the extent to which this is known, considering the deposit type.	any bias.
	•	If the relationship between the drilling
		orientation and the orientation of key
		mineralised structures is considered
		to have introduced a sampling bias,
		this should be assessed and reported
		if material.
Sample	•	The measures taken to ensure	•Samples were numbered in the field at the time of collection and recorded into a
security		sample security.	database
			•Drill core was photographed at the time of collection and again once boxed into core
			trays.
			•RC chip trays were photographed soon after the time of collection.
			•Samples were stored securely onsite then transported directly to ALS Townsville by
			GDM contractors.
			•No third party was involved with the handling of the sample between collection and drop
			off.
Audits or	•	The results of any audits or reviews of	•No review of field data has been undertaken at this stage.
reviews		sampling techniques and data.

9

==> picture [157 x 80] intentionally omitted <==

Section 2 Reporting of Exploration Results

(Criteria listed in the preceding section also apply to this section.)

Criteria JORC Code explanation	Commentary	Commentary	Commentary	Commentary	Commentary	Commentary	Commentary	Commentary
Mineral tenement and land tenure status • Type, reference name/number, location and ownership including agreements or material issues with third parties such as joint ventures, partnerships, overriding royalties, native title interests, historical sites, wilderness or national park and environmental settings. • The security of the tenure held at the time of reporting along with any known impediments to obtaining a licence to operate in the area.	•The Project tenements comprise EPM 17321. This licence is currently held 100% by Laura Exploration Pty Ltd, a 100% owned subsidiary of Great Divide Mining Ltd (ASX:GDM) •Refer to the Independent Solicitor’s Report on Tenements in the GDM Prospectus dated May 2023. •The tenement is in good standing.
Exploration done by other parties • Acknowledgment and appraisal of exploration by other parties.	•Whim Creek and Sons of Gwalia (JV) discovered the Yellow Jack gold deposit in the 1990s. The JV completed geochemical sampling programs and drilling programs (RAB, Aircore, RC drilling) during the 1990s. •Exploration reported herein has been conducted by GDM or its consultants and contractors.
Geology • Deposit type, geological setting and style of mineralisation.	•The Yellow Jack project is in the southwest of the Broken River Province, North Queensland, which is dominated by northeast-trending, deformed Ordovician to Devonian marine sediments and subordinate mafic volcanic rocks of the Graveyard Creek Sub-province. •GDM considers that the Yellow Jack Project is prospective for mesothermal (orogenic) vein and intrusion-related gold deposits. The district contains numerous old gold mine workings and known mineral occurrences. Yellow Jack lies ~80 km to the SE of the Kidston Gold Deposit.
Drill hole Information • A summary of all information material to the understanding of the exploration results including a tabulation of the following information for all Material drill holes: o easting and northing of the drill hole collar o elevation or RL (Reduced Level – elevation above sea level in metres) of the drill hole collar	•All drill	hole collar information is listed as follows (GDA94 Z55): Drill Type GPS Collar GDA94(m) Hole Azim (Mag) Hole Dip (deg) Total Depth (m) East North RL RC 273866 7861058 627 113 -60 94 RC 273831 7861080 618 113 -60 94 RC 273793 7861099 612 113 -60 94 RC 273974 7861364 616 113 -60 64 RC 273939 7861380 618 113 -60 94
	Hole	Drill Type	GPS Collar GDA94		(m)	Hole Azim (Mag)	Hole Dip (deg)	Total Depth (m)
			East	North	RL
	23YJRC200	RC	273866	7861058	627	113	-60	94
	23YJRC201	RC	273831	7861080	618	113	-60	94
	23YJRC202	RC	273793	7861099	612	113	-60	94
	23YJRC203	RC	273974	7861364	616	113	-60	64
	23YJRC204	RC	273939	7861380	618	113	-60	94

10

Criteria JORC Code explanation		Commentary
o dip and azimuth of the hole o down hole length and interception depth o hole length. • If the exclusion of this information is justified on the basis that the information is not Material and this exclusion does not detract from the understanding of the report, the Competent Person should clearly explain why this is the case.	23YJRC205	RC	273525	7860183	624	113	-60	70
	23YJRC206	RC	273493	7860200	628	113	-60	124
	23YJRC207	RC	273453	7860216	636	113	-60	130
	23YJRC208	RC	273567	7860248	622	113	-60	124
	23YJRC209	RC	273529	7860268	619	113	-60	118
	23YJRC210	RC	273496	7860288	618	113	-60	130
	23YJRC211	RC	273551	7860410	623	113	-60	154
	23YJRC212	RC	273696	7860421	612	113	-60	64
	23YJRC213	RC	273598	7860613	619	113	-60	184
	23YJRC214	RC	273584	7860383	627	113	-60	94
	23YJRC215	RC	273741	7860664	615	113	-60	94
	23YJRC216	RC	273906	7861306	612	113	-60	94
	23YJDD217	DD-HQ3	273871	7861230	622	113	-60	86.2
	23YJDD218	DD-HQ3	273743	7860843	608	113	-60	81.9
	23YJDD219	DD-HQ3	273623	7860457	626	113	-60	81.9
Data aggregation methods • In reporting Exploration Results, weighting averaging techniques, maximum and/or minimum grade truncations (eg cutting of high grades) and cut-off grades are usually Material and should be stated. • Where aggregate intercepts incorporate short lengths of high grade results and longer lengths of low grade results, the procedure used for such aggregation should be stated and some typical examples of such aggregations should be shown in detail. • The assumptions used for any reporting of metal equivalent values should be clearly stated.	• All gold intercepts quoted within the report are weighted averages Gold (g/t), using a cut-off of 0.5 g/t Au. • Where gold duplicate samples were part of the intercept (two samples from the same interval), the average of the two samples was used for that intercept. • In rare cases, one assay below the cut-off (internal “waste”) was included in the intercept.
Relationship between mineralisatio n widths and intercept lengths • These relationships are particularly important in the reporting of Exploration Results. • If the geometry of the mineralisation with respect to the drill hole angle is known, its nature should be reported. • If it is not known and only the down hole lengths are reported, there should	•Geometry of mineralisation within this document are unknown, and all intersections should be considered as down-hole length only, as true width is not known. •The gold intecepts quoted in the report are thought to be close to being perpendicular but they are not true widths.

11

Criteria	JORC Code explanation				Commentary
		be a clear statement to this effect (eg
		‘down hole length, true width not
		_known’). _
Diagrams	•	Appropriate maps and sections (with	•	All diagrams are located within the body of this report.
		scales) and tabulations of intercepts
		should be included for any significant
		discovery being reported These should
		include, but not be limited to a plan
		view of drill hole collar locations and
		appropriate sectional views.
Balanced	•	Where comprehensive reporting of all
reporting		Exploration Results is not practicable, representative reporting of both low and high grades and/or widths should be practiced to avoid misleading reporting	• • •	Observed veining has been reported - its relationship to grades is unknown. Balanced reporting of Exploration Results is presented.
		of Exploration Results.
Other	•	Other exploration data, if meaningful	•	All meaningful and material data is reported within the body of the report.
substantive		and material, should be reported
exploration data		including (but not limited to): geological observations; geophysical survey results; geochemical survey results;
		bulk samples – size and method of
		treatment; metallurgical test results;
		bulk density, groundwater, geotechnical
		and rock characteristics; potential
		deleterious or contaminating
		substances.
Further work	•	The nature and scale of planned further	•	A detailed 3D interpretation will be completed over the coming months.
		work (eg tests for lateral extensions or depth extensions or large-scale step-	•	Further drilling is planned to test possible extensions to mineralisation.
		out drilling).
	•	Diagrams clearly highlighting the areas
		of possible extensions, including the
		main geological interpretations and
		future drilling areas, provided this
		information is not commercially
		sensitive.

12