CORAZON MINING LIMITED — Regulatory Filings 2020

Aug 17, 2020

==> picture [567 x 96] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text -----

ASX ANNOUNCEMENT 18 AUGUST 2020
----- End of picture text -----

LYNN LAKE NICKEL PROJECT DRILLING PROGRAM UPDATE

• Drilling continues at the Fraser Lake Complex (FLC) within the Lynn Lake NickelCopper-Cobalt Sulphide Project in Canada

• Hole FLC2020-22 has been completed to target depth and provides further evidence of the potential for gravitational accumulation of sulphides

• Drilling has not intersected the gabbro’s basal contact and as such the hole will be kept open for further testing of the targets at depth – subject to results of additional geophysical surveys to be completed this month

• Drilling now underway at 2[nd] priority target at the FLC – the Western Contact Zone – which hosts multiple geophysical anomalies

• Initial target at the Western Contact Zone is a coincident magnetic high, gravity high, IP chargeability high and EM conductor

• Drilling is ongoing and results will be released when available

Corazon Mining Limited (ASX: CZN) (Corazon or Company) is pleased to provide an update on its current phase of drilling at the Lynn Lake Nickel-Copper-Cobalt Sulphide Project (Lynn Lake or Project) in Manitoba province, Canada.

Corazon’s drilling is focused on priority exploration targets at the Fraser Lake Complex (FLC), within the wider Lynn Lake Project area. The FLC is situated five (5) kilometres south of the Lynn Lake Mining Centre (Figure 1), where the Company is targeting significant, new nickel-sulphide discoveries.

The Company has now completed drilling at the first hole of the current program - drill hole FLC2020-22 – and has moved on to the second priority hole.

Hole FLC2020-22 was designed to test a magnetic high, possibly the result of the gravitational accumulation of suphide at the base of the FLC gabbroic intrusion and was successfully drilled to 704 metres (approximate target depth of ~530 metres below surface).

Hole FLC2020-22 did not intersect the basal contact of the intrusion as defined by existing geophysical surveys. An additional geophysical survey is proposed for later this month, which is expected to provide greater detail and clarity of this target at depth. As such, FLC2020-22 has been left open to facilitate re-entry and possible drilling below the current depth.

To its current depth, FLC2020-22 has not intersected significant sulphide accumulations. Interstitial sulphide of up to approximately 8% has been logged within

Level 3, 33 Ord St, West Perth, W.A. 6005 | PO Box 8187, Subiaco East, W.A. 6008 1 Ph: +61 (8) 63640518 | info@corazon.com.au | www.corazon.com.au | ASX: CZN

==> picture [567 x 96] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text -----

ASX ANNOUNCEMENT 18 AUGUST 2020
----- End of picture text -----

the gabbro. Sulphides within the Lynn Lake gabbros are typically dominated by pyrrhotite (iron), with lesser amounts of chalcopyrite (copper) and pentlandite (nickel).

In addition, characteristics exist within the gabbro drilled by FLC2020-22 that are indicative of gravitational segregation of minerals/sulphides (magmatic layering), supporting the potential for accumulation of heavy minerals (including sulphide) near the basal contact and in-line with the target model.

Drilling at new target area – Western Contact Zone

Drilling has now moved to a new target area within the FLC - the Western Contact Zone (WCZ), located approximately 800 metres to the northwest from hole FLC2020-22.

There are multiple geophysical anomalies within the WCZ, and drilling has commenced on the initial target (FLC2020-23), which is a coincident magnetic high, gravity high, IP chargeability high and EM conductor.

The WCZ target area has been generated from the recent re-processing of geophysical data. It links the Motruiuk Complex (ultramafic intrusive including peridotites) (Figure 1) with the marginal gabbroic units of the FLC.

==> picture [435 x 382] intentionally omitted <==

Figure 1 – Geology Interpretation and Project Area Outline

Level 3, 33 Ord St, West Perth, W.A. 6005 | PO Box 8187, Subiaco East, W.A. 6008 2 Ph: +61 (8) 63640518 | info@corazon.com.au | www.corazon.com.au | ASX: CZN

==> picture [567 x 96] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text -----

ASX ANNOUNCEMENT 18 AUGUST 2020
----- End of picture text -----

About Corazon

Corazon Mining Limited is an Australian resource company with projects in Australia and Canada.

In Canada, Corazon has consolidated the entire historical Lynn Lake Nickel Copper Cobalt Mining Centre (Lynn Lake) in the province of Manitoba. It is the first time Lynn Lake has been under the control of one company since mine closure in 1976.

Lynn Lake presents Corazon with a major development opportunity that is becoming increasingly prospective due to recent increases in the value of both nickel and cobalt metals, and their expected strong demand outlooks associated with their core use in the emerging global electric vehicle industry.

In Australia, Corazon has the Mt Gilmore Cobalt Copper Gold Sulphide Project (Mt Gilmore) located in New South Wales, which hosts the Cobalt Ridge Deposit - a unique high-grade cobalt-dominant sulphide deposit.

Mt Gilmore is a regionally substantive hydrothermal system with extensive cobalt, copper and gold anomalism. The Company has completed definition drilling at the Cobalt Ridge Deposit and is currently identifying new areas prospective for additional Cobalt Ridge lookalike deposits.

Both Lynn Lake and Mt Gilmore place Corazon in a strong position to take advantage of the growing demand for commodities critically required for the booming rechargeable battery sector.

ENDS

This announcement has been authorised on behalf of Corazon Mining Limited by Managing Director, Mr. Brett Smith.

For further information visit www.corazon.com.au or contact:

Brett Smith James Moses Managing Director Media & Investor Relations Corazon Mining Limited Mandate Corporate P: +61 (8) 6364 0518 M: +61 (0) 420 991 574 E: info@corazonmining.com.au E: james@mandatecorporate.com.au

Level 3, 33 Ord St, West Perth, W.A. 6005 | PO Box 8187, Subiaco East, W.A. 6008 3 Ph: +61 (8) 63640518 | info@corazon.com.au | www.corazon.com.au | ASX: CZN

==> picture [567 x 96] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text -----

ASX ANNOUNCEMENT 18 AUGUST 2020
----- End of picture text -----

Competent Persons Statement :

The information in this report that relates to Exploration Results and Targets is based on information compiled by Mr. Brett Smith, B.Sc Hons (Geol), Member AusIMM, Member AIG and an employee of Corazon Mining Limited. Mr. Smith has sufficient experience that is relevant to the style of mineralisation and type of deposit under consideration and to the activity which he is undertaking to qualify as a Competent Person as defined in the 2012 Edition of the “Australasian Code for Reporting of Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves”. Mr. Smith consents to the inclusion in the report of the matters based on this information in the form and context in which it appears.

Forward Looking Statements

This announcement contains certain statements that may constitute “forward looking statement”. Such statements are only predictions and are subject to inherent risks and uncertainties, which could cause actual values, results, performance achievements to differ materially from those expressed, implied or projected in any forward looking statements.

Forward-looking statements are statements that are not historical facts. Words such as “expect(s)”, “feel(s)”, “believe(s)”, “will”, “may”, “anticipate(s)” and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements. These statements include, but are not limited to statements regarding future production, resources or reserves and exploration results. All such statements are subject to certain risks and uncertainties, many of which are difficult to predict and generally beyond the control of the Company, that could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed in, or implied or projected by, the forward-looking information and statements. These risks and uncertainties include, but are not limited to: (i) those relating to the interpretation of drill results, the geology, grade and continuity of mineral deposits and conclusions of economic evaluations, (ii) risks relating to possible variations in reserves, grade, planned mining dilution and ore loss, or recovery rates and changes in project parameters as plans continue to be refined, (iii) the potential for delays in exploration or development activities or the completion of feasibility studies, (iv) risks related to commodity price and foreign exchange rate fluctuations, (v) risks related to failure to obtain adequate financing on a timely basis and on acceptable terms or delays in obtaining governmental approvals or in the completion of development or construction activities, and (vi) other risks and uncertainties related to the Company’s prospects, properties and business strategy. Our audience is cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements that speak only as of the date hereof, and we do not undertake any obligation to revise and disseminate forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances after the date hereof, or to reflect the occurrence of or non-occurrence of any events.

The Company believes that it has a reasonable basis for making the forward-looking Statements in the announcement based on the information contained in this and previous ASX announcements.

The Company is not aware of any new information or data that materially affects the information included in this ASX release, and the Company confirms that, to the best of its knowledge, all material assumptions and technical parameters underpinning the exploration results in this release continue to apply and have not materially changed.

Level 3, 33 Ord St, West Perth, W.A. 6005 | PO Box 8187, Subiaco East, W.A. 6008 4 Ph: +61 (8) 63640518 | info@corazon.com.au | www.corazon.com.au | ASX: CZN

18[th] August 2020

Table 3: Checklist of Assessment and Reporting Criteria

Core Drilling - Lynn Lake Project, Canada.

Section 1 Sampling Techniques and Data

Criteria	JORC Code explanation	Commentary
Sampling	Nature and quality of sampling (eg cut channels, random	Half core is sampled on the basis of geology. Minimum sample interval of down
techniques	chips, or specific specialised industry standard	to 6cm has been completed, based on geological criteria. Generally sampling
	measurement tools appropriate to the minerals under	completed is 1.0m through mineralised zones and a maximum of 1.5m
	investigation, such as down hole gamma sondes, or	elsewhere. Not all core is sampled.
	handheld XRF instruments, etc). These examples should
	not be taken as limiting the broad meaning of sampling.	The drill core is cut using an industry standard core saw. Individual samples
		are collected in labelled calico bags. Sample weights are typically between 2kg
		and 5kg.
	Include reference to measures taken to ensure sample	Downhole depths are identified and labelled by the drilling company on core-
	representivity and the appropriate calibration of any	blocks inserted in the core trays and reconciled by the Geologist in charge of
	measurement tools or systems used.	the program.
		Sampling has been carried out using industry standard practices that are
		appropriate for the style of mineralisation being tested.
	Aspects of the determination of mineralisation that are	Sampling has been undertaken with regards to defining the statistically
	Material to the Public Report.	anomalous lower bounds of mineralisation for the style of mineralisation being
		tested. The criteria used to define mineralisation and anomalous or significant
	In cases where ‘industry standard’ work has been done this	mineralisation within the report is specified.
	would be relatively simple (eg ‘reverse circulation drilling
	was used to obtain 1 m samples from which 3 kg was	Lynn Lake includes nickel, copper and cobalt sulphide mineralisation that has
	pulverised to produce a 30 g charge for fire assay’). In other	historically been mined and processed to metal concentrates. The
	cases more explanation may be required, such as where	determination of mineralisation utilizes industry standard exploration techniques
	there is coarse gold that has inherent sampling problems.	and are defined within this table.
	Unusual commodities or mineralisation types (eg submarine
	nodules) may warrant disclosure of detailed information
Drilling	Drill type (eg core, reverse circulation, open-hole hammer,	NQ drill core is being undertaken by Vital Drilling Services from Ontario,
techniques	rotary air blast, auger, Bangka, sonic, etc) and details (eg	utilizing a skid mounted Boyles BBS 37. Rod lengths are 3m, with core run
	core diameter, triple or standard tube, depth of diamond	lengths also of 3m.
	tails, face-sampling bit or other type, whether core is
	oriented and if so, by what method, etc).	Depth capacity of this drill rig is approximately 900 metres

1

18[th] August 2020

Table 3: Checklist of Assessment and Reporting Criteria

Core Drilling - Lynn Lake Project, Canada.

Criteria	JORC Code explanation	Commentary
Drill sample	Method of recording and assessing core and chip sample	Recovery of the core drilling is typically excellent (+99%). Ground conditions
recovery	recoveries and results assessed.	and core recovery at Lynn Lake are very good.
	Measures taken to maximise sample recovery and ensure	The drilling company takes responsibility for core recoveries, with instances of
	representative nature of the samples.	core loss (poor recovery) being immediately reported to the supervising
		geologist. Instances of poor core recovery are documented by the drilling
		company and by the geologists/technicians during logging of the core.
	Whether a relationship exists between sample recovery and	No sample bias has been observed. Areas adjected to historical mining
	grade and whether sample bias may have occurred due to	operations may be broken and core loss may occur drilling close to old stopes.
	preferential loss/gain of fine/coarse material.
Logging	Whether core and chip samples have been geologically and	Core is geologically logged and tested for magnetic susceptibility &
	geotechnically logged to a level of detail to support	conductivity.
	appropriate Mineral Resource estimation, mining studies and metallurgical studies.	Logging is conducted by a qualified geologist and to ensure consistency, is overseen by the Company’s Chief Geologist.
		Logging is of a standard that supports appropriate Mineral Resource
		estimations, mining studies and metallurgical studies to be undertaken.
	Whether logging is qualitative or quantitative in nature. Core	Core logging records both the qualitative and quantitative aspects of the
	(or costean, channel, etc) photography.	geology and mineralisation. Information recorded from logging are both
		measurable and descriptive. This includes (but is not restricted to) recording of
		lithology, alteration, mineralogy, weathering characteristics, geotechnical and
		structural features, textural and interpretive information.
	The total length and percentage of the relevant intersections	All drill holes are logged in full.
	logged.
Sub-	If core, whether cut or sawn and whether quarter, half or all	Drill core is cut and typically half core is taken as a sample for analysis.
sampling	core taken.
techniques
and sample
preparation
	If non-core, whether riffled, tube sampled, rotary split, etc	Not applicable for core drilling.

2

Table 3: Checklist of Assessment and Reporting Criteria

18[th] August 2020

Core Drilling - Lynn Lake Project, Canada.

Criteria	JORC Code explanation	Commentary
	and whether sampled wet or dry.
	For all sample types, the nature, quality and	Samples are transported to TSL Laboratories in Saskatoon for sample
	appropriateness of the sample preparation technique.	preparation, including total sample crushing and pulverising to 80% passing 75
		microns. TSL complete an initial analysis for nickel, copper and cobalt using
		multielement analysis using ICP-MS with a 4 acid digest (30 gram samples).
		Based on the initial assay results from TSL, it is expected selected samples will
		be forwarded to ACME Laboratories in Vancouver for additional multielement
		analysis using ICP-MS with a 4 acid digest (30 gram samples). A total of 37
		elements are tested for (ACME method code AQ525).
		Both TSL and ACME are accredited Canadian laboratories.
	Quality control procedures adopted for all sub-sampling	Quality control measures include sample duplicates (taken as an additional split
	stages to maximise representivity of samples.	in the Lab from the coarse reject sample), CANMET certified reference
		materials (standards) and silica blanks. Duplicates and silica blanks are
		taken/inserted at a minimum of one in 30 samples. Standards are inserted at a
		minimum rate of one in 30 samples, or at a greater frequency through
		mineralised zones.
		Assay results at plus 1% nickel are repeated as “check assays” with the
		inclusion of higher grade CANMET standards.
		The laboratory (TSL and ACME) also have their own duplicate, repeat and
		standard testing protocols, with the results reported to the Company.
		Sample security, shipment and transport is overseen by the senior geologist in
		charge of the drilling program.
	Measures taken to ensure that the sampling is	Quality control measures include core duplicates (1/4 core),
	representative of the in situ material collected, including for
	instance results for field duplicate/second-half sampling.

3

Table 3: Checklist of Assessment and Reporting Criteria

18[th] August 2020

Core Drilling - Lynn Lake Project, Canada.

Criteria	JORC Code explanation	Commentary
	Whether sample sizes are appropriate to the grain size of	Sample sizes are considered appropriate for the rock type and style of
	the material being sampled.	mineralisation at Lynn Lake.
Quality of	The nature, quality and appropriateness of the assaying and	The analytical techniques used for Lynn Lake are considered appropriate for
assay data	laboratory procedures used and whether the technique is	the mineralisation type.
and laboratory tests	considered partial or total.	Initial assaying for nickel, copper and cobalt is completed by TSL Laboratories in Saskatoon multielement analysis using ICP-MS with a 4 acid digest (30 gram samples).
		Additional selected samples may be transported to ACME Laboratories in
		Vancouver for analysis. Analysis includes a multi-element analysis using ICP-
		MS with a 4 acid digest (30 gram samples). A total of 37 elements are tested
		for (ACME method code AQ525).
		Both TSL and ACME are accredited Canadian laboratories.
	For geophysical tools, spectrometers, handheld XRF	A hand-held XRF (Niton) may be used for the purposes of assisting with
	instruments, etc, the parameters used in determining the	mineral identification. Such results are not reported.
	analysis including instrument make and model, reading
	times, calibrations factors applied and their derivation, etc.
	Nature of quality control procedures adopted (eg standards,	Quality control measures include sample duplicates (taken as an additional split
	blanks, duplicates, external laboratory checks) and whether	in the Lab from the coarse reject sample), CANMET certified reference
	acceptable levels of accuracy (ie lack of bias) and precision	materials (standards) and silica blanks. Duplicates and silica blanks are
	have been established.	taken/inserted at a minimum of one in 30 samples. Standards are inserted at a
		minimum rate of one in 30 samples, or at a greater frequency through
		mineralised zones.
		The laboratory (TSL and ACME) also have their own duplicate, repeat and
		standard testing protocols, with the results reported to the Company.
		Sample security, shipment and transport is overseen by the senior geologist in
		charge of the drilling program.

4

Table 3: Checklist of Assessment and Reporting Criteria

18[th] August 2020

Core Drilling - Lynn Lake Project, Canada.

Criteria	JORC Code explanation	Commentary
Verification	The verification of significant intersections by either	Drilling is being managed by a senior geologist with experience in deposits
of sampling	independent or alternative company personnel.	consistent with the style of mineralisation at Lynn Lake. All work is overseen
and		by Corazon’s consultant and nickel sulphide expert Dr Larry Hulbert.
assaying
		The assay results are consistent with expectations from the geological logging.
	The use of twinned holes.	The reported drill holes have not been twinned.
	Documentation of primary data, data entry procedures, data	All data is captured electronically on site and transferred to backup facilities.
	verification, data storage (physical and electronic) protocols.	All paper information is captured electronically and stored digitally and in paper
		format.
	Discuss any adjustment to assay data.	No adjustment to primary assaying has been undertaken. For reporting
		significant intersections, all averaging over intervals is calculated on an
		individual interval weighted average basis.
Location of	Accuracy and quality of surveys used to locate drill holes	Drill holes were positioned using a hand-held Garmin GPS with an assumed
data points	(collar and down-hole surveys), trenches, mine workings	accuracy of +5 metres and a Reflex Northfinder APS, with sub-metre.
	and other locations used in Mineral Resource estimation.	Down-hole surveys were completed with a Gyro supplied and operated by the
		Vital Drilling.
	Specification of the grid system used.	The survey data is recorded in real-world co-ordinate system NAD 83 Zone 14.
	Quality and adequacy of topographic control.	Lynn Lake is an historical mining centre. All past drilling has been recorded by
		surveyors on a Local Mine Grid. All drilling has been transformed to real-world
		coordinate system NAD 83 Zone 14. The “Z-Values” for surface drilling have
		been adjusted and pegged to the surface DTM provided by a 2008 VTEM
		geophysical survey. All underground drilling has been corrected such that drill
		holes have elevations defined by underground plans and sections, and
		subsequently transformed to elevations defined by real-world coordinate
		system NAD 83 Zone 14.

5

18[th] August 2020

Table 3: Checklist of Assessment and Reporting Criteria

Core Drilling - Lynn Lake Project, Canada.

Criteria	JORC Code explanation	Commentary
		The Company considers the accuracy of the x, y and z coordinates of the
		underground drilling to be very good. While the x and y coordinates for the
		surface drilling are very good, a more accurate and up to date DTM is required
		to define the z values.
Data spacing	Data spacing for reporting of Exploration Results.	Drill holes are widely space and targeting areas of interest defined from
and		historical drilling, past mining and geophysical trends defined by Corazon
distribution		Mining Limited.
		This drilling is intended to identify areas of interest for future resource definition
		drilling.
	Whether the data spacing and distribution is sufficient to	This exploration is reconnaissance in nature and as such will not result in the
	establish the degree of geological and grade continuity	immediate definition of a mineral resource estimation.
	appropriate for the Mineral Resource and Ore Reserve
	estimation procedure(s) and classifications applied.
	Whether sample compositing has been applied.	No compositing was applied.
Orientation	Whether the orientation of sampling achieves unbiased	Drill holes are widely space and targeted at individual areas of interest and
of data in	sampling of possible structures and the extent to which this	geophysical anomalies.
relation to geological structure	is known, considering the deposit type.	Azimuths and dips are variable, dependent on the targets being tested. Drilling attempts to intersect the targets normal to the assumed dominant trend. Positioning and targeting of drilling around historical workings also needs to
		consider access complexities and the targeting of drill holes such that voids are
		avoided.
		The Lynn Lake deposit are described as “pipe-like bodies” that can be
		influenced by controlling structures.
		The ‘form’ of the mineralised bodies within the Fraser Lake Complex is less
		defined. Drilling to date supports concentrations of sulphide proximal to
		sedimentary xenoliths and interpreted structures. Gravitational accumulation
		of sulphide minerals is also documented. Pipe-like feeder bodies have yet to
		be defined.
		There is no data that supports a bias for the sampling has been established.

6

18[th] August 2020

Table 3: Checklist of Assessment and Reporting Criteria

Core Drilling - Lynn Lake Project, Canada.

Criteria	JORC Code explanation	Commentary
	If the relationship between the drilling orientation and the	The is widely spaced and the orientation of drilling and key mineralised
	orientation of key mineralised structures is considered to	structures is not considered to have introduced a sampling bias.
	have introduced a sampling bias, this should be assessed and reported if material.	The Lynn Lake deposit are described as “pipe-like bodies” that can be influenced by controlling structures. Drilling for the reported program attempts
		to test areas adjacent to historical infrastructure and mining. Reported
		mineralised intervals may not be defined as “true widths”. Where possible,
		information regarding true widths is provided.
Sample	The measures taken to ensure sample security.	Sample security on site is overseen by the senior geologist in charge of the
security		drilling program.
		Individual samples are collected in plastic bags, before being bundled together
		into sealed in large PVC bags and sealed with security tags for transport to the
		laboratory via a recognised freight service.
Audits or	The results of any audits or reviews of sampling techniques	Industry standard duplicate sampling and submission of certified blank and
reviews	and data.	standard samples have been undertaken.
		At this stage, no audits or reviews have been conducted.

Section 2 Reporting of Exploration Results

(Criteria listed in the preceding section also apply to this section.)

Criteria	JORC Code explanation	Commentary
Mineral	Type, reference name/number, location and ownership	The claims that make up the Lynn Lake Project are 100% owned by Corazon
tenement	including agreements or material issues with third parties	Mining Limited.
and land tenure status	such as joint ventures, partnerships, overriding royalties, native title interests, historical sites, wilderness or national park and environmental settings.	Corazon Mining works closely with First Nation groups and several government organizations responsible for mining and the environment. Work Permits are currently in place for land-based drilling.

7

18[th] August 2020

Table 3: Checklist of Assessment and Reporting Criteria

Core Drilling - Lynn Lake Project, Canada.

Criteria	JORC Code explanation	Commentary
	The security of the tenure held at the time of reporting along	The tenure includes multiple Mineral Claims, within the historical mining centre,
	with any known impediments to obtaining a licence to	as defined by the Provincial Government of Manitoba. All claims are currently
	operate in the area.	in good standing.
		Work Permits are in place for the work being completed. There are no
		impediments in maintaining Corazon’s rights over this project.
Exploration	Acknowledgment and appraisal of exploration by other	Where exploration has been completed by other parties, those parties have
done by	parties.	been referenced in this document or within previous ASX announcements by
other parties		the Company. In particular refer to CZN ASX announcement dated 11 April
		2016.
		Lynn Lake is an historical mining centre, discovered in the late 1940’s,
		explored and operated as a mine by the company Sherritt Gordon up until
		1976. Subsequent to mine closure, the tenure has been in part owned by
		multiple parties. Corazon has consolidated the mining centre and all
		prospective exploration ground, for the first time since mine closure in 1976.
Geology	Deposit type, geological setting and style of mineralisation.	Greenstone hosted magmatic nickel-copper-cobalt sulphide deposits
		associated within mafic/ultramafic intrusives (gabbro related).
		Volcanogenic massive sulphide (VMS) deposits also exist in the project area.
		These are zinc dominant, with lesser amounts of lead, copper, silver and gold.
Drill hole	A summary of all information material to the understanding	Survey data presented in real-world grid system NAD 83 Zone 14. Down-hole
Information	of the exploration results including a tabulation of the	survey information is not considered material and has not been provided.
	following information for all Material drill holes: o easting and northing of the drill hole collar o elevation or RL (Reduced Level – elevation above sea	Drill hole collar survey data pertaining to this report are presented in the table below.
	level in metres) of the drill hole collar
	o dip and azimuth of the hole
	o down hole length and interception depth
	o hole length.

8

Table 3: Checklist of Assessment and Reporting Criteria

18[th] August 2020

Core Drilling - Lynn Lake Project, Canada.

Criteria JORC Code explanation	Commentary
	The planned depth of FLC2020-23 is 363 metres. HOLE ID EAST NORTH RL AZI DIP DEPTH FLC2020-22 370490.1 6295682 347 347 -49 704 FLC2020-23 369838 6296160 350 204 -50 Not Completed Fraser Lake Complex(FLC)
If the exclusion of this information is justified on the basis that the information is not Material and this exclusion does not detract from the understanding of the report, the Competent Person should clearly explain why this is the case.	Material information not included in the table above includes the “down hole length and interception depth”. This information has been provided in table form in the body of the announcement. Downhole survey data is not reported within and is not considered material to this report. Reported mineralised intervals may not be defined as “true widths”. Where possible, information regarding true widths is provided.
Data aggregation methods In reporting Exploration Results, weighting averaging techniques, maximum and/or minimum grade truncations (eg cutting of high grades) and cut-off grades are usually Material and should be stated.	No data aggregation has been reported in this announcement and no adjustment to primary assaying has been undertaken. For reporting significant intersections, all averaging over intervals is calculated on an individual interval weighted average basis. Parametres and criteria for calculating intervals are defined within the notes of tables presented. Individual nickel grades are presented on the drill hole section provided within the report.
Where aggregate intercepts incorporate short lengths of high grade results and longer lengths of low grade results, the procedure used for such aggregation should be stated and some typical examples of such aggregations should be shown in detail.	All averaging over intervals is calculated on an individual interval weighted average basis from the primary (initial) assay data. No bottom-cuts or top-cuts have been applied.

9

18[th] August 2020

Table 3: Checklist of Assessment and Reporting Criteria

Core Drilling - Lynn Lake Project, Canada.

Criteria	JORC Code explanation	Commentary
		Parametres and criteria for calculating intervals are defined within the notes of
		tables presented.
	The assumptions used for any reporting of metal equivalent	Metal equivalent values are not reported.
	values should be clearly stated.
Relationship	These relationships are particularly important in the	Typical Lynn Lake Ni-Cu-Co Magmatic Sulphide Deposits
between mineralisatio n widths and intercept lengths	reporting of Exploration Results.	Known nickel-copper-cobalt magmatic sulphide deposits in the Lynn Lake Mining Centre are typically “pipe-like” in form, averaging between 80m and 120m in strike, 30m to 60m in width and with vertical extents of 100’s of metres. The historically mined deposits in the Lynn Lake area have been developed to a maximum depth of approximately 1,100 metres.
		Multiple sulphide pipe-like deposits have been identified and mined in the Lynn
		Lake area. The core of these bodies can be massive sulphide bodies or
		sulphide breccia bodies, grading out in sulphide intensity to weakly
		disseminated at the margins.
		The ‘form’ of the mineralised bodies within the Fraser Lake Complex is less
		defined. Drilling to date supports concentrations of sulphide proximal to
		sedimentary xenoliths and interpreted structures. Gravitational accumulation
		of sulphide minerals is also widely observed. Pipe-like feeder bodies within the
		Fraser Lake system have yet to be defined.
	If the geometry of the mineralisation with respect to the drill	Azimuths and dips of the drill holes are variable, dependent on the targets
	hole angle is known, its nature should be reported.	being tested.
		The Lynn Lake deposit are described as “pipe-like bodies” that can be
		influenced by controlling structures. Drilling for the reported program attempts
		to test areas adjacent to historical infrastructure and mining. Reported
		mineralised intervals may not be defined as “true widths”. Where possible,
		information regarding true widths is provided.

10

Table 3: Checklist of Assessment and Reporting Criteria

18[th] August 2020

Core Drilling - Lynn Lake Project, Canada.

Criteria	JORC Code explanation	Commentary
	If it is not known and only the down hole lengths are	This report identifies the down hole lengths of mineralisation intersected in the
	reported, there should be a clear statement to this effect (eg	drilling. Reference within the body of the report may define interpreted true
	‘down hole length, true width not known’).	widths of mineralisation.
Diagrams	Appropriate maps and sections (with scales) and tabulations	Appropriate diagrams have been included in the announcement.
	of intercepts should be included for any significant discovery
	being reported. These should include, but not be limited to a
	plan view of drill hole collar locations and appropriate
	sectional views.
Balanced	Where comprehensive reporting of all Exploration Results is	This report tables results of the interpreted mineralised zone intersected by the
reporting	not practicable, representative reporting of both low and	drilling. Results include the broad lower-grade interval as well as narrow high-
	high grades and/or widths should be practiced to avoid	grade intervals.
	misleading reporting of Exploration Results.	Parametres and criteria for calculating intervals are defined within the notes of
		tables presented.
Other	Other exploration data, if meaningful and material, should be	The Lynn Lake project has been explored for more than 75 years and was
substantive	reported including (but not limited to): geological	mined for more than 24 years. There exists an enormous amount of historical
exploration	observations; geophysical survey results; geochemical	data available to the company.
data	survey results; bulk samples – size and method of
	treatment; metallurgical test results; bulk density,	This announcement only contains results for the current exploration program at
	groundwater, geotechnical and rock characteristics;	Lynn Lake. Historical exploration results and mining data are referenced if
	potential deleterious or contaminating substances.	considered material to this announcement.
Further work	The nature and scale of planned further work (eg tests for	The results presented in this announcement support the potential for the
	lateral extensions or depth extensions or large-scale step-	definition of near surface mineralisation within the mining centre, that could add
	out drilling).	to the resource estimate for the Lynn Lake Project.
		Such mineralisation would be considered beneficial for any future mining
		operation. Resource definition style drilling of these areas will be tabled for
		consideration at a future date.

11

18[th] August 2020

Table 3: Checklist of Assessment and Reporting Criteria

Core Drilling - Lynn Lake Project, Canada.

Criteria	JORC Code explanation	Commentary
	Diagrams clearly highlighting the areas of possible	All relevant diagrams have been presented in this report.
	extensions, including the main geological interpretations and
	future drilling areas, provided this information is not
	commercially sensitive.

12