AI assistant
Chen Xing Development Holdings Limited — Proxy Solicitation & Information Statement 2024
Apr 2, 2024
50498_rns_2024-04-02_6c8c675d-a3ef-4b40-aac8-cd7ea22b6913.pdf
Proxy Solicitation & Information Statement
Open in viewerOpens in your device viewer
THIS CIRCULAR IS IMPORTANT AND REQUIRES YOUR IMMEDIATE ATTENTION
If you are in any doubt as to any aspect of this circular or as to the action to be taken, you should consult your licensed securities dealer, registered institution in securities, bank manager, solicitor, professional accountant or other professional adviser.
If you have sold or transferred all your shares in Chen Xing Development Holdings Limited, you should at once hand this circular to the purchaser or transferee or to the bank, stockbroker or other agent through whom the sale or transfer was effected for transmission to the purchaser or transferee.
Hong Kong Exchanges and Clearing Limited and The Stock Exchange of Hong Kong Limited take no responsibility for the contents of this circular, make no representation as to its accuracy or completeness and expressly disclaim any liability whatsoever for any loss howsoever arising from or in reliance upon the whole or any part of the contents of this circular.
==> picture [295 x 60] intentionally omitted <==
MAJOR AND CONNECTED TRANSACTION DISPOSAL OF 51% EQUITY INTEREST IN INDIRECT NON-WHOLLY OWNED SUBSIDIARY
Capitalised terms used on this cover page have the same meanings as defined in the section headed “Definitions” in this circular, unless the context requires otherwise.
A letter from the Board is set out on pages 5 to 17 of this circular.
The Equity Transfer Agreement and the Disposal have been approved by written approval obtained from White Dynasty BVI, the controlling Shareholder, pursuant to Rule 14.44 of the Listing Rules in lieu of a general meeting of the Company. This circular is being despatched to the Shareholders for information only.
28 March 2024
CONTENT
| Page | ||
|---|---|---|
| DEFINITIONS. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . | 1 | |
| LETTER FROM THE BOARD . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . | 5 | |
| APPENDIX I | — FINANCIAL INFORMATION OF THE GROUP. . . . . . . . . . . . . | 18 |
| APPENDIX II | — SUMMARY OF BUSINESS VALUATION REPORT . . . . . . . . . . | 23 |
| APPENDIX III | — PROPERTY VALUATION REPORT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . | 195 |
| APPENDIX IV | — GENERAL INFORMATION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . | 220 |
– i –
DEFINITIONS
In this circular, unless the context otherwise requires, the following expressions shall have the following meanings:
-
“Board” the board of Directors
-
“Business Valuation Report” the business valuation report in respect of the value of the Equity Interest of Jinzhong Development prepared by the Business Valuer, using the asset-based approach with 30 September 2023 as the appraisal reference date, a summary of which has been enclosed in Appendix II to this circular
-
“Business Valuer” Shanxi Jiahao Real Estate and Assets Evaluation Co., Ltd.* (山西家豪房地產資產評估有限公司), an independent valuer in connection with the valuation of the equity interest of Jinzhong Development Group
“Company” Chen Xing Development Holdings Limited (辰興發展控股 有限公司), an exempted company incorporated in the Cayman Islands with limited liability and the issued Shares are listed on Main Board of the Stock Exchange
-
“Completion” the completion of the Disposal pursuant to the terms of the Equity Transfer Agreement
-
“connected person(s)” has the meaning ascribed to it in the Listing Rules
-
“Director(s)” the director(s) of the Company
-
“Disposal” the Disposal of the Equity Interest in Jinzhong Development, which in turn owns and controlled approximately 67% of the equity interest in Jinzhong Xiya
-
“Equity Interest” the entire 51% of the equity interest in Jinzhong Development, being the subject matter of the Disposal
-
“Equity Transfer Agreement” the equity transfer agreement dated 29 December 2023 entered into between the Vendor and the Purchaser in respect of the Disposal
-
“Forecast Period” the 12 months from the date of this circular
-
“GFA”
-
gross floor area
– 1 –
DEFINITIONS
“Group” the Company and its subsidiaries “HK$” Hong Kong dollars, the lawful currency of Hong Kong “Hong Kong” the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region of the PRC “Jinzhong Asset Exchange” Jinzhong City Asset and Equity Exchange* (晉中市產權交易中心)
“Jinzhong Development” Jinzhong Development Zone Real Estate Development Co., Ltd.* (晉中開發區房地產開發有限公司), a limited liability company established in the PRC in February 2013 and an indirect non-wholly owned subsidiary of the Company, which is owned as to 51% by the Vendor, and 49% by the Purchaser
-
“Jinzhong Development Group”
-
Jinzhong Development and Jinzhong Xiya
-
“Jinzhong Management Committee”
-
the Management Committee of Shanxi Transformation Comprehensive Reform Demonstration Zone Jinzhong Development Zone* (山西轉型綜合改革示範區晋中開發 區), formerly known as the management committee of Economic Technology Development District, Jinzhong (晋 中經濟技術開發區管委會), and is ultimately controlled by Jinzhong City People’s Government (晉中市人民政府)
-
“Jinzhong Xiya”
-
Jinzhong Xiya Real Estate Development Co., Ltd. (晉中熙 雅房地產開發有限公司), a limited liability company established in the PRC in April 2018 and an indirect non-wholly owned subsidiary of the Company, which is owned as to approximately 67% by Jinzhong Development, and approximately 33% by Xi’an Yajule Enterprise Management Consulting Co., Ltd. (西安雅居樂企業管理 諮詢有限公司)
-
“Latest Practicable Date”
-
25 March 2024, being the latest practicable date prior to the printing of this circular for the purpose of ascertaining certain information contained herein
-
“Listing Rules”
-
the Rules Governing the Listing of Securities on the Stock Exchange
– 2 –
DEFINITIONS
“Property Valuation Report” the property valuation report in respect Jinzhong Development prepared by the Property Valuer, using the market approach with 31 December 2023 as the appraisal reference date, which has been enclosed in Appendix III to this circular “Property Valuer” Vincorn Consulting and Appraisal Limited, an independent valuer in connection with its valuation of the property interests to be disposed by the Group
-
“PRC” the People’s Republic of China, for the purpose of this circular, excluding Hong Kong, Macao Special Administrative Region of the PRC and Taiwan
-
“Public Display” the public display for the proposed acquisition and disposal of the Equity Interest through Jinzhong Asset Exchange, which shall take place during the Public Display Period
-
“Public Display Period” five natural day period commencing from 29 December 2023 (being the execution date of the Equity Transfer Agreement) and ending on 2 January 2024, with the Disposal being displayed on the website of Jinzhong Asset Exchange
-
“Public Tender” the public tender for the proposed acquisition and disposal of the Equity Interest through Jinzhong Asset Exchange, which shall take place during the Public Tender Period
-
“Public Tender Period” five natural day period commencing from 25 December 2023 and ending on 29 December 2023
-
“Purchaser” Jinzhong Development Zone Development and Construction Group Co., Ltd.* (晉中開發區開發建設集團有限公司), a limited liability company established in the PRC which is owned as to 65% by Jinzhong Management Committee and 35% by Jinzhong Public Utilities Infrastructure Holding Group Co., Ltd. (晉中市公用基礎設施投資控股(集團)有限 公司), both of which being ultimately controlled by Jinzhong City People’s Government (晉中市人民政府)
-
“RMB” Renminbi, the lawful currency of the PRC
– 3 –
DEFINITIONS
“SFO” the Securities and Futures Ordinance (Chpater 571 of the Laws of Hong Kong) “Shareholders” the holder(s) of the Shares
- “Share(s)” ordinary shares with a nominal value of HK$0.01 each in the share capital of the Company
“Stock Exchange” The Stock Exchange of Hong Kong Limited “Vendor” Chenxing Real Estate Development Co., Ltd.* (辰興房地產 發展有限公司), an indirect wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company “White Dynasty BVI” White Dynasty Global Holdings Limited, a company incorporated in the British Virgin Islands with limited liability and is wholly-owned by White Empire (PTC) Limited (白氏帝國(私人信託)有限公司), a company incorporated in the British Virgin Islands with limited liability and which was wholly-owned by Mr. Bai Xuankui (白選奎), the chairman and executive Director of the Board and a controlling Shareholder
“%” per cent.
- English name for identification purpose only
English names of the PRC established companies/entities in this circular are only translations of their official Chinese names. In case of inconsistency, the Chinese names prevail.
In this circular, RMB has been converted to HK$ at the rate of RMB0.91 = HK$1.00 for illustration purpose only. No representation is made that any amounts in RMB or HK$ have been, could have been or could be converted at the above rate or at any other rates or at all.
– 4 –
LETTER FROM THE BOARD
==> picture [295 x 60] intentionally omitted <==
Executive Directors:
Mr. Bai Xuankui (Chairman) Mr. Bai Wukui (Chief Executive Officer) Mr. Bai Guohua Mr. Dong Shiguang
Registered office: Cricket Square, Hutchins Drive PO Box 2681 Grand Cayman, KY1-1111 Cayman Islands
Independent non-executive Directors: Mr. Tian Hua Mr. Qiu Yongqing Ms. Gao Jianhua
Head office and principal place of business in the PRC: 18 Anning Street Yuci District Jinzhong City Shanxi Province The PRC
Principal place of business in Hong Kong: 40th Floor, Dah Sing Financial Centre No. 248 Queen’s Road East Wanchai Hong Kong
28 March 2024
To the Shareholders
Dear Sir or Madam,
MAJOR AND CONNECTED TRANSACTION DISPOSAL OF 51% EQUITY INTEREST IN INDIRECT NON-WHOLLY OWNED SUBSIDIARY
INTRODUCTION
Reference is made to the announcements of the Company dated 29 December 2023, 22 January 2024 and 31 January 2024 in relation to the Equity Transfer Agreement and the Disposal.
The purpose of this circular is to provide you with information regarding, among other things, (i) further details in relation to the Equity Transfer Agreement and the Disposal; and (ii) other information required under the Listing Rules.
– 5 –
LETTER FROM THE BOARD
BACKGROUND
The Vendor, an indirect wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company, proposed to sell the Equity Interest in Jinzhong Development to the Purchaser. Since the Equity Interest is regarded as state-owned assets under the relevant PRC rules, the transfer of Equity Interest is subject to Public Tender and Public Display. During the Public Tender Period, the Purchaser had participated in the Public Tender through Jinzhong Asset Exchange to purchase the Equity Interest in Jinzhong Development from the Vendor. The Board wishes to announce that, on 29 December 2023, the Purchaser was confirmed by Jinzhong Asset Exchange as the successful bidder of the Equity Interest.
EQUITY TRANSFER AGREEMENT
On 29 December 2023 (after trading hours), the Vendor entered into the Equity Transfer Agreement with the Purchaser, pursuant to which the Vendor has conditionally agreed to sell, and the Purchaser has conditionally agreed to purchase, the Equity Interest in Jinzhong Development, which in turn owns and controls approximately 67% of the equity interest in Jinzhong Xiya, in accordance with the terms and conditions of the Equity Transfer Agreement.
The principal terms of the Equity Transfer Agreement are set out below:
Date: 29 December 2023 Parties: Chenxing Real Estate Development Co., Ltd.* (辰興房地產 發展有限公司) (as the Vendor)
Jinzhong Development Zone Development and Construction Group Co., Ltd.* (晉中開發區開發建設集團有限公司) (as the Purchaser)
Subject matter:
The Vendor has conditionally agreed to sell and the Purchaser has conditionally agreed to purchase the Equity Interest of Jinzhong Development.
– 6 –
LETTER FROM THE BOARD
Consideration and payment term:
The total consideration for the Disposal is RMB100,600,000 (equivalent to approximately HK$110,549,451). An actual sum of RMB34,789,345.33 (equivalent to approximately HK$38,230,049.81) shall be payable by the Purchaser to the Vendor at Completion in cash, as the following payments shall be set off from the total consideration for the Disposal:
-
(i) an outstanding dividend of RMB36,702,300 (equivalent to approximately HK$40,332,197.8) payable from Jinzhong Development to the Vendor;
-
(ii) an outstanding sum of RMB100,953,018.16 (equivalent to approximately HK$110,937,382.59) payable from Vendor and its related companies to Jinzhong Development; and
-
(iii) a transition cost of RMB1,559,936.51 (equivalent to approximately HK$1,714,215.95) payable by the Vendor to Jinzhong Development for the Disposal.
Conditions precedent:
Completion is subject to (1) the Purchaser being the successful bidder of the Equity Interest during the Public Tender Period; (2) the Shareholders having passed a resolution at a general meeting or by way of written approval from Shareholder(s) who hold more than 50% of the voting rights in lieu of holding a general meeting (if applicable) to approve the Equity Transfer Agreement and the Disposal, and the satisfaction of any other requirements under the Listing Rules by the Company; and (3) the Purchaser receiving no objection for the acquisition of the Equity Interest during the Public Display Period.
All the conditions precedent are non-waivable whether in whole or in part.
As at the date of the circular, all of the conditions precedent have been fulfilled.
– 7 –
LETTER FROM THE BOARD
Basis of consideration in respect of the Disposal
The consideration in respect of the Disposal of the Equity Interest in Jinzhong Development, which represents 51% of the entire equity interest in Jinzhong Development, is determined primarily with reference to (1) the proportionate appraised asset value of the entire equity interest of Jinzhong Development by the Business Valuer using asset-based approach, being approximately RMB100,615,200 (equivalent to approximately HK$110,566,200), representing a premium of approximately 0.02% over the consideration; (2) the consolidated book value of the underlying assets of Jinzhong Development Group, being approximately RMB155.5 million (equivalent to approximately HK$170.9 million), the proportionate value of which being approximately RMB79.3 million (equivalent to approximately HK$87.1 million), representing a discount of approximately 21.2% to the consideration; (3) the current adverse market conditions and property market sentiments in the PRC; and (4) the factors set out in the paragraph headed “Reasons for and Benefits of the Disposal” below.
Board’s assessment on the valuation of the Equity Interest and the underlying properties of Jinzhong Development Group
Valuation in respect of the Equity Interest
In assessing the basis of the consideration in respect of the Disposal, the Company has engaged the Business Valuer to appraise the value of the equity interest of Jinzhong Development Group. According to the Business Valuation Report, the appraised consolidated net assets of Jinzhong Development Group as at 30 September 2023 was approximately RMB197,284,700 (equivalent to approximately HK$215,697,473) using the asset-based approach. The proportionate appraised asset value of the entire equity interest of Jinzhong Development Group, accordingly, is approximately RMB100,615,200 (equivalent to approximately HK$110,566,200).
The Board is of the view that the scope, methodologies and assumptions adopted by the Business Valuer in respect of the Equity Interest are fair and reasonable.
With regard to the valuation of the Equity Interest, the Board understands from the Business Valuer that (I) the income approach is not an adequate approach for the valuation of the Equity Interest because (a) Jinzhong Development Group is currently in the suspension stage, and development and construction have not yet begun for the land parcels (other than land parcels comprising a portion of Phase I of Yijun Community (頤郡小區) and the land parcel comprising Xiyuan (熙苑)); and (b) the economic characteristics, market structure factors, industry life cycle, industry prosperity and other factors of the real estate industry changed significantly, making it impossible to make reasonable predictions on future operations and income, and thus it is not appropriate to adopt the income approach for valuation; (II) the market approach is not applicable
– 8 –
LETTER FROM THE BOARD
for the valuation of the same, as there are insufficient comparable market transactions available for the derivation of the fair value of Jinzhong Development Group; and thus (III) the asset approach is the most appropriate valuation approach to value the Equity Interest and the adjusted net assets value method under the asset approach has been applied in the valuation of the same.
The Board considers the assumption of the Business Valuer that the information related to the valuation as obtained from the Board and others in relation to Jinzhong Development Group (including financial information) is accurate and complete to be reasonable.
In arriving at its appraisal result, the Business Valuer had, among others, assumed that:
-
(1) The ownership of the appraised assets being in good condition and tradable in the market, not subject to any lien and easement, have not been violated and bearing no other encumbrances;
-
(2) All certificates, licenses, letters of consent or other legal or administrative authorization documents signed or issued by relevant local and national governmental institutions, private organisations or groups which are required have been obtained or updated; and
-
(3) All the significant or potential factors which may affect the valuation analysis have been fully disclosed between us and the valued entity.
In respect of the financial information of the Group, the Business Valuer had relied on the auditors’ report as prepared by Shanxi Huayi Accounting Firm Co., Ltd.* (山西華益會計師事務所 有限公司), an auditor registered under the Shanxi Finance Bureau (山西省財政廳) and a qualified auditor in the PRC.
In respect of information relating to property and title ownership, the Business Valuer had relied on the legal opinion prepared by Shanxi Dingzheng Law Firm *(山西鼎正律師事務所), a law firm registered at Shanxi Judiciary Bureau (山西省司法廳) and a qualified law firm in the PRC. The Board understood that according to the legal opinion, each of Jinzhong Development and Jinzhong Xiya are holders of the respective land use rights and possessed State-owned Land Use Rights Certificate 《國有土地使用權證》( ), which is recognized and protected by the PRC law, and the respective land use rights are not encumbranced.
Furthermore, with respect to the Business Valuation Report, considering that the assets of Jinzhong Development Group have clear property rights and complete financial information, all assets and liabilities can be identified. The appraised assets can be identified in terms of their quantities based on financial information and purchase and construction information and verified in terms of their quantities through on-site surveys. As such, the asset-based approach was adopted
– 9 –
LETTER FROM THE BOARD
for the preparation of the Business Valuation Report. According to the requirements of the relevant standards for asset appraisal, the appraisal under the Business Valuation Report has taken into full consideration, among other things, the relevant requirements for the purpose of appraisal, the subject and scope of appraisal and the type of value. The Business Valuer has adopted the asset-based approach for appraisal through on-site inspection of the subject of appraisal and the collection and analysis of relevant information.
Valuation in respect of the underlying properties of Jinzhong Development Group
Pursuant to Rule 5.03 of the Listing Rules, since the consolidated assets of Jinzhong Development Group comprises mainly of property interest including residential properties and carparking spaces, a separate valuation has also been conducted in respect of the property interests concerned. The Company has engaged the Property Valuer to appraise the value of the underlying properties of Jinzhong Development Group, comprising (1) three phases of mixed-use residential and commercial developments, namely Yijun Community (頤郡小區); and (2) residential properties and carparking spaces from mixed-use residential and commercial developments, namely Xiyuan (熙苑). According to the Property Valuation Report, the aggregated market value attributable to the Group of the property interests to be disposed of by the Group amounted to approximately RMB140 million, representing approximately 39% premium over the consideration in respect of the Disposal. For further details, including the market valuation of the property interests concerned, valuation methodology and other general information, please refer to the Property Valuation Report in Appendix III of the circular.
The Board is also of the view that the scope, methodologies and assumptions adopted by the Property Valuer in respect of the underlying property interests of Jinzhong Development Group are fair and reasonable.
For the valuation of the underlying property interests of Jinzhong Development Group, the Board understood that (i) the direct comparison method under the market approach is considered the most preferable and generally accepted method to adopt when market comparables are available; (ii) the Property Valuer had analysed recent market transaction evidences of properties within neighbouring region of the properties concerned and similar developments which have characteristics comparable to the properties concerned (the “ Comparable Properties ”); (iii) the Comparable Properties represent an exhaustive list to the best of the Property Valuer knowledge; and (iv) relevant adjustments were made by the Property Valuer to reflect the difference between the Comparable Properties and the properties concerned in terms of attributes including but not limited to time, location, size, land use and density. Accordingly, the Board concurs with the valuer that the selection of Comparable Properties used in the valuation of the Property and the basis of the adjustments made are fair and reasonable.
– 10 –
LETTER FROM THE BOARD
Fairness and reasonableness of the consideration in respect of the Disposal
The Group is principally engaged in property development with focus on development projects of residential and commercial properties. Over the recent years, the real estate market in the PRC has faced significant challenges. Adverse macroeconomic conditions, exacerbated by the then ongoing COVID-19 pandemic and geopolitical conflicts, have led to decreased demand, supply chain disruptions, and diminished market optimism. The industry has been further impacted by regulatory measures addressing the high leverage risks among certain real estate firms, leading to a contraction in financing options. Additionally, the escalating liquidity crisis has fueled a cautious approach among prospective property buyers and investors, further dampening the willingness to engage in property transactions, thereby affecting real estate sales negatively.
For the year ended 31 December 2023, both the primary and secondary housing markets experienced a downturn, exerting additional downward pressure on property values. The real estate sector has been hampered by a variety of factors, including a stricter lending environment, restricted access to financing, a sluggish sales landscape, and increasing debt repayment obligations. These conditions have precipitated a widespread emergence of credit risk, defaults, and challenges in repaying investment products, significantly undermining market confidence.
The Group relies on borrowings from financial institutions for its property development projects, which imposes interest burden on the Group and increases the liquidity needs of the Group. As disclosed in the interim report of the Company for the six months ended 30 June 2023, the Group had outstanding bank borrowings of approximately RMB3,089.0 million as at 30 June 2023, and the Group had outstanding bank borrowings of approximately RMB3,155.1 million as at 31 December 2022. As further disclosed in the annual report of the Company for the year ended 31 December 2022, to address material uncertainties as to the ability of the Group to continue as a going concern and mitigate the liquidity pressure of the Group, the Board had planned to dispose commercial properties of the Group which are non-core business of the Group to generate more cash inflows.
The Board had noted that the consideration in respect of the Disposal of the Equity Interest, being RMB100,600,000 (equivalent to approximately HK$110,549,451), represents a discount of approximately 0.02% to the appraised value under the Business Valuation Report and approximately 39% to the appraised value under the Property Valuation Report, respectively.
Prior to entering into the Equity Transfer Agreement, the Group has been looking for potential purchaser of the Equity Interest and its underlying assets for a substantial period of time. In accordance with the applicable PRC rules requirement, the Vendor has also advertised the Disposal of the Equity Interest by Public Tender on the Jinzhong Asset Exchange in order to seek potential purchaser for the Equity Interest. The Purchaser, being an existing shareholder of
– 11 –
LETTER FROM THE BOARD
Jinzhong Development Group and an entity ultimately controlled by Jinzhong City People’s Government (晉中市人民政府), is the only party who expressed interest in acquiring the Equity Interest and the underlying properties of the Jinzhong Development Group.
While the consideration represents a discount to the valuation results under the Business Valuation Report and the Property Valuation Report, in view of the prevailing property market conditions in the PRC and the financial position of the Group, the Board believes that the Disposal will allow the Group to realise its majority shareholding stakes in Jinzhong Development Group and to replenish the working capital of the Group. Accordingly, the Company agreed to the consideration in respect of the Disposal of the Equity Interest.
Having considered and taking into account (i) the fact that the Business Valuation Report has been prepared in compliance with PRC valuation procedures, standards, laws and regulations by the Business Valuer; (ii) that the Business Valuer had reviewed relevant financial information, operational information and other relevant data concerning Jinzhong Development Group; (iii) the reasons for the adoption of the asset-based approach for the valuation of the Equity Interest of Jinzhong Development, the methodologies and assumptions adopted by the Business Valuer, the scope of the valuation and the valuation results; (iv) the valuation results in respect of the property interests concerned under the Property Valuation Report; and (v) the factors as indicated in the section headed “Reasons for and Benefits of the Disposal” below, the Directors consider that the appraisal results reflected the value of the Equity Interest of Jinzhong Development and are fair and reasonable.
Procedures for Public Tender and Public Display
The Equity Interest is regarded as state-owned assets under the relevant PRC rules. Therefore, the transfer of the Equity Interest is subject to Public Tender during the Public Tender Period and Public Display during the Public Display Period. The Vendor and the Purchaser had jointly appointed Jinzhong Asset Exchange to facilitate the procedures for Public Tender and Public Display.
INFORMATION ON JINZHONG DEVELOPMENT GROUP
Jinzhong Development is a limited liability company established in the PRC and is principally engaged in sales and development of real estate properties.
Jinzhong Xiya is a limited liability company established in the PRC and is principally engaged in sales and development of real estate properties. Jinzhong Xiya is owned as to approximately 67% by Jinzhong Development, and approximately 33% by Xi’an Yajule Enterprise Management Consulting Co., Ltd.* (西安雅居樂企業管理諮詢有限公司).
– 12 –
LETTER FROM THE BOARD
The underlying assets of Jinzhong Development Group comprising mainly:
-
(1) three phases of mixed-use residential and commercial developments, namely Yijun Community (頤郡小區) project;
-
(2) residential properties and carparking spaces from mixed-use residential and commercial developments, namely Xiyuan (熙苑) project (which is held through equity interest of Jinzhong Development in Jinzhong Xiya); and
-
(3) account receivable in the amount of approximately RMB958 million (equivalent to approximately HK$1.05 billion).
Both Yijun Community (頤郡小區) and Xiyuan (熙苑) are located on Huazhang Street of the Development District of Jinzhong City (晉中市開發區化章街). The sale of a portion of Phase I of the mixed-use properties from Yijun Community (頤郡小區) project had commenced in January 2019 and the construction was completed in November 2020. The sale of the residential properties from Xiyuan (熙苑) project had commenced in December 2018 and the construction was completed in December 2020. A portion of Phase I, the entire Phase II and the entire Phase III of Yijun Community (頤郡小區) are vacant land parcels that are yet to be developed and are currently vacant.
– 13 –
LETTER FROM THE BOARD
Set out below is certain unaudited consolidated financial information of Jinzhong Development Group for the year ended 31 December 2021 and 31 December 2022 and the nine months ended 30 September 2023 and 30 September 2022, respectively:
| For the nine | For the nine | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| months | For the year | months | For the year | |
| ended 30 | ended 31 | ended 30 | ended 31 | |
| September | December | September | December | |
| 2023 | 2022 | 2022 | 2021 | |
| RMB’000 | ||||
| Net assets | 155,496 | 228,095 | 228,095 | 181,634 |
| Profit before tax | 6,597 | 46,461 | 46,461 | 146,285 |
| Profit after tax | 6,563 | 43,456 | 46,461 | 117,002 |
REASONS FOR AND BENEFIT OF THE DISPOSAL
The Board considers that the Disposal is a strategic move to capitalise on the value of the underlying properties of Jinzhong Development Group in order to replenish the working capital of the Group and address material uncertainties as to the ability of the Group to continue as a going concern.
The underlying properties of Jinzhong Development Group comprises mainly, among others, mixed-use residential and commercial developments from Yijun Community (頤郡小區) (with a majority of the phases of which being vacant land parcels that are yet to be developed), and residential properties and carparking spaces from Xiyuan (熙苑).
The Board is of the view that the Disposal represents a valuable opportunity for the Group to replenish its working capital by realising its investment in the Jinzhong Development Group. The Disposal of the vacant land parcels pertaining to Yijun Community (頤郡小區) would allow the Group to monetise its investment against the backdrop of the gloomy property market conditions in the PRC. Furthermore, since the construction of residential properties from Phase I of Yijun Community (頤郡小區) project and Xiyuan (熙苑) project has been completed and Jinzhong Development Group had sold most of the residential properties from the projects, the underlying assets of Jinzhong Development Group in that respect has already been monetised and the Disposal would allow the Group to realize its share of the sale proceeds.
– 14 –
LETTER FROM THE BOARD
The proceeds from the Disposal, a majority of which will be utilised for the purpose of repayment of existing bank loans of the Group, will improve the liquidity position of the Company, replenish the working capital of the Group and reduce its debt burden, thereby strengthening the financial stability.
The Board is also of the view that the Disposal will position the Group more favorably for future opportunities, reallocate its financial resources for optimizing its operational efficiency and enhancing return to the Group, allowing for the potential acquisition or investment in other land parcels or property projects with a healthier balance sheet.
Accordingly, the Directors (including all the independent non-executive Directors) consider that the terms of the Equity Transfer Agreement are fair and reasonable, and that the Disposal is on normal commercial terms and in the interests of the Company and the Shareholders as a whole.
FINANCIAL EFFECT OF THE DISPOSAL AND INTENDED USE OF PROCEEDS
Upon completion of the Disposal, Jinzhong Development and Jinzhong Xiya will cease to be subsidiaries of the Company and their financial results will no longer be consolidated into the financial statements of the Group.
It is estimated that an unaudited gain of approximately RMB9.1 million (equivalent to approximately HK$10 million) will arise from the Disposal. Such estimated unaudited gain is calculated by deducting:
- (i) the total consideration for the Disposal in the amount of RMB100,600,000 (equivalent to approximately HK$110,549,451);
with
- (ii) the carrying amount of the disposed net assets of Jinzhong Development Group attributable to the Group as at 31 December 2023 of RMB91,495,092 (equivalent to approximately HK$100,544,057).
The expected net proceeds (after deducting the relevant expenses incidental to the Disposal) of approximately RMB23.5 million (equivalent to approximately HK$25.8 million) to be received by the Company from the Disposal will be used for repayment of bank loans and replenishment of general working capital of the Group. Subject to actual circumstances, the Group intends to apply (i) approximately RMB10 million (equivalent to approximately HK$10.99 million) for repayment of bank loans; and (ii) the remaining proceeds of approximately RMB13.5 million (equivalent to approximately HK$14.8 million) for general working capital.
– 15 –
LETTER FROM THE BOARD
INFORMATION ABOUT THE GROUP AND THE PURCHASER
The Company is an investment holding company and its subsidiaries are principally engaged in property development with focus on development projects of residential and commercial properties. The Vendor is an indirect wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company.
The Purchaser is a limited liability company established in the PRC which is principally engaged in the investment and management urban infrastructure and sales and development of land and real estate property in the PRC. The Purchaser is owned as to 65% by Jinzhong Management Committee and 35% by Jinzhong Public Utilities Infrastructure Holding Group Co., Ltd. (晉中市公 用基礎設施投資控股(集團)有限公司), both of which being ultimately controlled by Jinzhong City People’s Government (晉中市人民政府).
LISTING RULES IMPLICATION
The Purchaser is a substantial shareholder of Jinzhong Development which holds 49% equity interest in Jinzhong Development as of the date of this circular. As Jinzhong Development is an indirect non-wholly owned subsidiary of the Company, the Purchaser is therefore a connected person of the Company at the subsidiary level. Accordingly, the Disposal constitutes a connected transaction of the Company.
Given that (i) the Purchaser is a connected person of the Company at the subsidiary level; (ii) the Board has approved the Equity Transfer Agreement and the Disposal; and (iii) the independent non-executive Directors have confirmed that (1) the terms of the transactions are fair and reasonable, (2) the transactions are on normal commercial terms or better and (3) in the interests of the Company and the Shareholders as a whole, the Disposal is only subject to the reporting and announcement requirements, and is exempt from the circular, independent financial advice and shareholders’ approval requirements under Rule 14A.101 of the Listing Rules.
Nonetheless, as one or more of the applicable percentage ratios calculated in accordance with Rule 14.07 of the Listing Rules in respect of the Disposal is more than 25% but all of them are less than 75%, the Disposal constitutes a major transaction of the Company and is subject to the reporting, announcement, circular and shareholders’ approval requirements under Chapter 14 of the Listing Rules.
White Dynasty BVI, being the controlling Shareholder directly holding 346,944,000 Shares (representing approximately 57.82% of the total number of issued Shares as at the date of this circular), has given its written approval for the Equity Transfer Agreement and the Disposal. To the best knowledge, information and belief of the Directors, as at the date of this circular, after having made all reasonable enquiries, no Shareholders or any of their respective associates have
– 16 –
LETTER FROM THE BOARD
any material interest in the Equity Transfer Agreement and the Disposal. As such, no Shareholder is required to abstain from voting on the resolution approving the Equity Transfer Agreement and the Disposal if the Company is to convene a general meeting. Accordingly, such written approval is accepted in lieu of holding a general meeting pursuant to Rule 14.44 of the Listing Rules.
None of the Directors had material interests in the transactions or was required to abstain from voting on the relevant resolutions of the Board.
RECOMMENDATION
The Directors (including all the independent non-executive Directors) consider that the terms of the Equity Transfer Agreement are fair and reasonable, and that the Disposal is on normal commercial terms and in the interests of the Company and the Shareholders as a whole. Although a general meeting will not be convened by the Company to approve the Equity Transfer Agreement and the Disposal, if such a general meeting were to be convened by the Company, the Board would have recommended the Shareholders to vote in favour of the resolutions to approve the Equity Transfer Agreement and the Disposal.
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
Your attention is also drawn to the additional information set out in the appendices to this circular.
Yours faithfully By order of the Board Chen Xing Development Holdings Limited Bai Xuankui Chairman
– 17 –
FINANCIAL INFORMATION OF THE GROUP
APPENDIX I
1. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
The audited consolidated financial statements of the Group for each of the three years ended 31 December 2020, 2021 and 2022 and unaudited interim condensed consolidated financial information of the Company for the six months ended 30 June 2023 are disclosed in the following documents which have been published on the websites of the Stock Exchange (http://www.hkexnews.hk) and the Company (http://www.chen-xing.cn):
-
annual report of the Company for the year ended 31 December 2020 (pages 279-396) (https://www1.hkexnews.hk/listedco/listconews/sehk/2021/0427/2021042702148.pdf)
-
annual report of the Company for the year ended 31 December 2021 (pages 297-404) (https://www1.hkexnews.hk/listedco/listconews/sehk/2022/0428/2022042800690.pdf)
-
annual report of the Company for the year ended 31 December 2022 (pages 298-404) (https://www1.hkexnews.hk/listedco/listconews/sehk/2023/0428/2023042801114.pdf)
-
interim report of the Company for the six months ended 30 June 2023 (pages 84-108) (https://www1.hkexnews.hk/listedco/listconews/sehk/2023/0928/2023092800797.pdf)
2. STATEMENT OF INDEBTEDNESS
Indebtedness Statement
As at the close of business on 31 January 2024, being the latest practicable date for the purpose of this indebtedness statement prior to the printing of this circular, the details of the Group’s indebtedness and contingent liabilities (unaudited) were as follows:
Bank and other borrowings
As at 31 January 2024, the Group had outstanding bank and other borrowings of approximately RMB3,033,852,000. The borrowings comprised (i) unsecured and unguaranteed other borrowings of approximately RMB46,500,000; (ii) unsecured and guaranteed bank borrowings of approximately RMB330,400,000; (iii) secured and guaranteed bank borrowings of approximately RMB2,606,952,000 and (iv) secured and unguaranteed other borrowings of approximately RMB50,000,000.
The aforesaid secured bank and other borrowings were secured by the shares of subsidiaries of the Group, Group’s building, property under development and properties held for sale.
– 18 –
FINANCIAL INFORMATION OF THE GROUP
APPENDIX I
Amounts due to related parties and directors
As at 31 January 2024, the Group had outstanding amounts due to related parties of approximately RMB216,600,000 and due to directors of approximately RMB63,704,000, which were unguaranteed and unsecured.
Guarantees
The Group provided guarantees in respect of bank mortgage loans taken out by purchasers of the Group’s sale properties. For guarantees provided in respect of residential properties, the guarantees are released upon the issuance of real estate ownership certificate of the properties concerned. As at 31 January 2024, such guarantees totaled of approximately RMB1,520,614,000.
Save as aforesaid, and apart from intra-group liabilities and normal trade and other payables in the normal course of business, as at the close of business on 31 January 2024, the Group did not have any debt securities issued or outstanding or authorised or otherwise created but unissued, bank overdrafts, loans or other similar indebtedness, liabilities under acceptances or acceptance credits, debentures, mortgages, charges, hire purchases commitments, guarantees or other material contingent liabilities.
3. MATERIAL ADVERSE CHANGE
The Directors confirm that, as at the Latest Practicable Date, there had been no material adverse change in the financial or trading position of the Group since 31 December 2022, being the date to which the latest published audited consolidated financial statement of the Group were made up.
4. WORKING CAPITAL
As at 31 December 2023, bank loans with interest payable of approximately RMB4,314,000 had not been repaid according to their scheduled repayment date. As the Group failed to repay the loan interests in accordance with the repayment schedule for the year ended 31 December 2023, the related loans became immediately due in accordance with terms of loan agreements. Hence, the entire principal of approximately RMB321,817,000 together with interest payable and penalty interest of approximately RMB4,314,000 and approximately RMB180,000 respectively were classified as current liabilities at 31 December 2023.
As stipulated in the relevant loan and financing agreements in respect of certain borrowings of the Group other than those mentioned above, the delay of repayment of the above borrowings may trigger the rights to request for immediate repayment term of certain borrowings with
– 19 –
FINANCIAL INFORMATION OF THE GROUP
APPENDIX I
principal amount of approximately RMB2,438,465,000. Hence, the entire amount of the borrowings became immediately payable and has been classified as current liabilities as at 31 December 2023.
In the preparation of the Group’s working capital forecast, the Directors have given careful consideration to the Group’s future liquidity and performance and its available sources of financing to continue as a going concern. The working capital forecast for the Forecast Period have been prepared with the following major assumptions and events being taken into account of:
-
(i) the Disposal will be completed in the first half of 2024 and the payment of the consideration will be settled in accordance with the Equity Transfer Agreement;
-
(ii) the lenders in respect of the borrowings that have the rights to demand for immediate repayment will not exercise their rights to demand immediate repayment of the relevant loans and prior to their scheduled contractual repayment dates;
-
(iii) lenders of other loans with maturity dates due during the Forecast Period will extend their maturity dates and will not demand partial or full repayment of the loans; and
-
(iv) the core business operation, asset base of the Group and the market conditions in which the Group operates and/or invests in will not differ materially from those of present.
As a result of the borrowings that might be demanded for immediate repayment, the future operating cash inflow of the Group may not be sufficient to match the repayment schedule of borrowings and relevant interest payment.
The Board has continuously devoted effort to resolve the liquidity issue mentioned above. In view of these circumstances and to address the issue on working capital sufficiency, the Company has taken and propose to take the following measures:
-
(i) the Group verbally agreed with the Group’s lenders not to enforce their rights of requesting for immediate repayment and to renew or extend the borrowings prior to their respective maturity dates;
-
(ii) The Group is in active negotiations with the lenders in respect of the borrowings that have the rights to demand for immediate repayment for a debt restructuring so as to settle the borrowings by using the proceeds from new borrowing plans;
– 20 –
APPENDIX I
FINANCIAL INFORMATION OF THE GROUP
-
(iii) the directors of the Group have prepared a business strategy plan mainly focuses on the acceleration of the pre-sales and sales of its properties under development and completed projects in order to generate additional operating cash inflows and putting extra efforts on the collection of trade debtors to improve the debtors’ turnover days, and the implementation of cost control measures; and
-
(iv) The Company will continue to seek suitable opportunities to dispose of its equity interests in certain project development companies in order to generate additional cash inflows.
As of the date of this circular and within twelve months from the date of this circular, the Board does not plan to dispose equity interests in project development companies comprising core business of the Group. Furthermore, the Company does not plan to significantly downsize the operation of its principal business.
Taking into account the assumption stated above, with the successful implementation of the measures mentioned above, the Directors are of the opinion that the Group would have had sufficient working capital for at least the Forecast Period from the date of the circular.
During the year ended 31 December 2023 and up to the date of this circular, the Directors had not received any notices or requests from banks and other company for immediate repayment of the borrowings that have the rights to do so.
Subsequent to 31 December 2023 and as of the date of this circular, the Group obtained new borrowing facilities of RMB250 million. Following the successful renewal of bank and other borrowings of approximately RMB855,972,000 during the year for terms ranging from nine months to three years, the management expected that the Group would be able to renew bank and other borrowings with an aggregate outstanding principal of RMB2,815,782,000 that are repayable within one year for another year prior to their respective maturity dates.
Notwithstanding the above, material uncertainties exist that may cast significant doubt on the Group’s ability to continue as going concern, which depends on (i) whether it can successfully negotiate with the lenders on the extension or deferral of the repayment of the Group’s borrowings, renewal of existing borrowings upon maturity and the new borrowing plans and (ii) the successful implementation of measures described above in the normal course of businesses.
– 21 –
FINANCIAL INFORMATION OF THE GROUP
APPENDIX I
Shareholders should note that the validity of the statement of the working capital sufficiency of the Group as mentioned above depends on the outcome of the above-mentioned plans and measures undertaken/being undertaken by the Group, which are subject to uncertainties. Should the Group fail to achieve the above-mentioned consideration and measures, the Group may not have sufficient working capital for its requirements for at least the Forecast Period.
The Company has obtained the relevant confirmation as required under Rule 14.66(12) of the Listing Rules.
5. FINANCIAL AND TRADING PROSPECTS OF THE GROUP
In the first half of 2023, the real estate industry was under serious downward pressure. Regarding the real estate industry, as leading real estate companies successively experienced capital chain rupture and were under greater financing pressure, they were less willing to make investment and hence resulted in a decrease in the new construction area. Regarding the real estate market, it showed a trend of rise before fall. In the first quarter, with the adjustment to the purchase restriction policies in first-tier and second-tier cities, both sales and sales area increased significantly. However in the second quarter, with the concentrated release of consumer demand, the demand for housing for home upgrades increased and the sales index gradually declined.
It is expected that the real estate market in the PRC will focus on the general principles of guaranteeing delivery of housing, people’s livelihood and stability. The real estate policy will be more inclined to establish a new model for the development of the real estate industry, standardize the management of the real estate industry, and optimize the development structure of the industry, to ultimately resolve the risks of the real estate industry and the market. With the improvement of the macro environment, it is expected that the real estate market will gradually recover. However, due to the strong wait-and-see sentiment in the market, lack of consumer confidence and reduced purchasing power, the market recovery process will be slow in the short term.
Given the current situation of the real estate market in the PRC and the forecast of future development, while the Company does not plan to significantly downsize the operation of its principal business, the Company will proactively make corresponding adjustments to its business strategy, adjust its marketing strategy in a timely manner, and seek market breakthroughs to revitalize its existing assets and accelerate sales collection, to improve the Company’s operating status from the sales side and improve the ability to deal with and resolve risks. In the meantime, the Company will seek financial support and partners through multiple channels to prevent and resolve the risk prevention and control of the Company. In addition, in view of the insufficient working capital, the Directors will consider realising part of the Group’s property interests if considered necessary. Save for the above, the Group has no intention to dispose of or scale down its remaining business or assets.
– 22 –
SUMMARY OF BUSINESS VALUATION REPORT
APPENDIX II
The following is a summary of the valuation report dated 21 December 2023 prepared by the Property Valuer in connection with its valuation of Jinzhong Development as at 30 September 2023 for the purpose of, among others, inclusion in this circular.
Summary of Valuation Report The Entire Shareholders’ Interests in
Jinzhong Development Zone Real Estate Development Co., Ltd. * (晉中開發區房地產開發有限公司) Involved in the Equity Transaction by Chenxing Real Estate Development Co., Ltd. * (辰興房地產發展有限公司)
CONTENT
| Page | ||
|---|---|---|
| **1. ** | BASIS OF VALUATION. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . | 30 |
| 1.1 Laws and regulations. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . | 30 | |
| 1.2 Basis of criteria and normative documents . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . | 32 | |
| 1.3 Economic behavior documents . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . | 33 | |
| 1.4 Ownership basis and major contract documents . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . | 33 | |
| 1.5 Basis of pricing . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . | 34 | |
| 1.6 Other basis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . | 34 | |
| **2. ** | VALUATION METHODOLOGY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . | 35 |
| **3. ** | VALUATION CONCLUSION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
36 |
| 3.1 Current assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . | 37 | |
| 3.1.1 Development costs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
39 | |
| 3.1.1.1 Land transfer premium . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . | 39 |
– 23 –
SUMMARY OF BUSINESS VALUATION REPORT
APPENDIX II
| (A) Calculation of the residential land price of the | |
|---|---|
| valuation object using market comparison approach . . . . . . . . | 40 |
| (I) Land parcel 3: Jin (2018) Jin Zhong Shi Bu | |
| Dong Chan Quan No. 0006414 and | |
| land parcel 4: Jin Kai Guo Yong (2016) | |
| No. 0207004 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . | 40 |
| (B) Calculation of the residential land price of the | |
| valuation object using residue approach . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . | 62 |
| (I) Land parcel 3: Jin (2018) Jin Zhong Shi Bu | |
| Dong Chan Quan No. 0006414. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . | 62 |
| (II) Land parcel 4: Jin Kai Guo Yong (2016) | |
| No. 0207004 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . | 68 |
| (C) Calculation of the commercial land price of the valuation | |
| object using market comparison approach. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . | 74 |
| (I) Land parcel 1: Jin Kai Guo Yong (2016) | |
| No. 0207003, land parcel | |
| 2: Jin Kai Guo Yong (2016) No. 0207005 | |
| and land parcel 3: Jin (2018) | |
| Jin Zhong Shi Bu Dong Chan Quan No. 0006414 . . . . . . | 74 |
| (D) Calculation of the commercial land price of the valuation | |
| object using residue approach . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . | 102 |
| (I) Land parcel 1: Jin Kai Guo Yong (2016) | |
| No. 02070003 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . | 102 |
| (II) Land parcel 2: Jin Kai Guo Yong (2016) | |
| No. 0207005 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . | 109 |
| (III) Land parcel 3: Jin (2018) Jin Zhong Shi Bu Dong | |
| Chan Quan No. 0006414. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . | 116 |
| 3.1.1.2 Deed tax . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . | 124 |
| 3.1.1.3 Survey fees, design fees, construction road water and | |
| electricity engineering fees, other infrastructure fees, | |
| engineering survey fees . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . | 125 |
– 24 –
SUMMARY OF BUSINESS VALUATION REPORT
APPENDIX II
| 3.1.2 Product development . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . | 126 |
|---|---|
| 3.1.2.1 Unsold commercial residential housings . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . | 126 |
| 1. Selection of comparables . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . | 127 |
| 2. Correction of comparables . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
129 |
| 3. Comparison correction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . | 130 |
| 4. Determination of the value of valuation object . . . . . . . . . | 132 |
| 3.1.2.2 Unsold underground parking spaces . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . | 133 |
| 1. Calculation of the average annual net income | |
| per parking space . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . | 133 |
| 2. Determination of the return rate (Y) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . | 134 |
| 3. Determination of the income-generating years (n) . . . . . . . . . . | 134 |
| 4. Determination of net income incremental rate (g) . . . . . . . . . . |
135 |
| 5. Determination of the value of a parking space . . . . . . . . . . . . . | 135 |
| 6. Determination of the total value of the use rights | |
| for all inventory parking spaces . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . | 136 |
| 3.1.2.3 Community centre . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . | 137 |
| 1. Calculation of the carrying amount of | |
| the community centre . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . | 137 |
| 2. Reason for presentation of the community centre | |
| at carrying amount . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . | 137 |
| 3.1.3 Monetary funds . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . | 138 |
| 3.1.4 Prepayments. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . | 138 |
| 3.1.5 Other receivables . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . | 138 |
| 3.1.6 Other current assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . | 139 |
| 3.2 Long-term equity investment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . | 140 |
| 3.2.1 Valuation method for non-current assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . | 140 |
– 25 –
SUMMARY OF BUSINESS VALUATION REPORT
| APPENDIX II | SUMMARY OF BU | SINESS VALUATION REP | ORT |
| 3.3 Fixed assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . | 142 | |
| 3.3.1 Vehicles . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . | 142 | |
| 3.3.1.1 | For vehicles that are actively traded in the market, | ||
| the market approach is adopted for valuation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . | 142 | ||
| 3.3.1.2 | For vehicles that are not actively traded in the market, | ||
| the cost approach is adopted for valuation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
143 | ||
| 1. | Determination of replacement cost | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . | 143 |
| 2. | Determination of comprehensive newness rate . . . . . . . . . . . . . | 144 | |
| 3. | Determination of appraised value | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . | 145 |
| 4. | Valuation example . . . . . . . . . . . . . . | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . | 145 |
| 3.3.2 Equipment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . | 148 | |
| 3.3.2.1 | Determination of full replacement | price . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . | 149 |
| 3.3.2.2 | Determination of newness rate . . . | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . | 149 |
| 3.3.2.3 | Determination of appraised value | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . | 152 |
| 3.3.2.4 | Appraisal of second-hand price . . . | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . | 152 |
| 3.3.2.5 | Valuation example . . . . . . . . . . . . . | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . | 152 |
| 3.4 Current | liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . | 154 |
| 3.4.1 Accounts payable . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . | 154 | |
| 3.4.2 Advances from customers . . . . . . . . . | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . | 154 | |
| 3.4.3 Taxes payable . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . | 155 | |
| 3.4.4 Other payables. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . | 155 | |
| 3.5 Non-current liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . | 155 |
– 26 –
| APPENDIX II SUMMARY OF BUSINESS VALUATION REPORT |
APPENDIX II SUMMARY OF BUSINESS VALUATION REPORT |
|---|---|
| 4. VALUATION ASSUMPTIONS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . | 156 |
| 4.1 Basic assumptions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . | 156 |
| 4.2 General assumptions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . | 157 |
| 4.3 Special assumptions. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . | 157 |
| 5. SPECIAL NOTES. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . | 158 |
| 6. DATE OF BUSINESS VALUATION REPORT. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . | 164 |
| 7. VALUATION REPORT OF JINZHONG | |
| XIYA REAL ESTATE DEVELOPMENT CO., LTD.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . | 164 |
| 7.1 Description of Valuation Objects and Valuation Scope . . . . . . . . . . . . . . | 164 |
| 7.2 Technical Description of Valuation with Asset-based Approach . . . . . . | 166 |
| 7.2.1 Technical Description of Valuation of Current Assets . . . . . . . . . . . | 166 |
| 7.2.1.1 Scope of valuation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . | 166 |
| 7.2.1.2 Valuation verification process . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . | 166 |
| 7.2.1.3 Valuation approach . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . | 167 |
| (A) Other receivables. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . | 167 |
| (B) Inventories — product development. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . | 167 |
| 1. Overview of product development . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . | 168 |
| 2. Valuation process . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . | 169 |
| 3. Valuation approach . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . | 170 |
| i. Valuation of residential housings . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . | 170 |
| A. Valuation and calculation of Room 2403, | |
| 24/F, Building 1 of Agile Xiyuan. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . | 170 |
| B. Valuation and calculation of Room 701, | |
| 7/F, Building 1 of Agile Xiyuan . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . | 175 |
– 27 –
SUMMARY OF BUSINESS VALUATION REPORT
APPENDIX II
| ii. Valuation of shop. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . | 179 |
|---|---|
| iii. Evaluation of right-of-use of underground parking spaces . | 184 |
| 4. Inventory valuation results and appreciation/ | |
| depreciation analysis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . | 188 |
| 7.2.2 Technical Description of Valuation of Liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . | 188 |
| 7.2.2.1 Scope of valuation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . | 188 |
| 7.2.2.2 Verification process. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . | 189 |
| 7.2.2.3 Valuation approach . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . | 189 |
| (A) Accounts payable . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . | 189 |
| (B) Advances from customers . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . | 190 |
| (C) Taxes payable. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . | 190 |
| (D) Other payables . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . | 190 |
| 7.2.2.4 Valuation results . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . | 191 |
| 7.3 Valuation Conclusion and Analysis. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . | 191 |
| 7.3.1 Valuation Conclusion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . | 191 |
| 7.3.2 Difference between valuation result under the asset-based | |
| approach and the carrying value and the reasons for difference . . . . | 193 |
| 7.3.3 Consideration regarding the impact of control and | |
| liquidity on the value of the valuation object . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . | 194 |
– 28 –
SUMMARY OF BUSINESS VALUATION REPORT
APPENDIX II
To: Chenxing Real Estate Development Co., Ltd.*(辰興房地產發展有限公司)
Shanxi Jiahao Real Estate Asset Appraisal Co., Ltd(山西家豪房地產資產評估有限公司) accepted the appointment by Jinzhong Development Zone Real Estate Development Co., Ltd. (晉 中開發區房地產開發有限公司) (“ Jinzhong Development ”) to perform a valuation on the market value as at 30 September 2023 of the entire shareholders’ interests in Jinzhong Development, which constitutes the subject-matter of the proposed equity transaction by Chenxing Real Estate Development Co., Ltd.*(辰興房地產發展有限公司). The valuation was conducted by adopting the asset-based approach, in accordance with necessary valuation procedures and the requirements under relevant laws, administrative regulations and asset valuation standards, and following the principle of independence, objectivity and fairness. The asset valuation is hereby reported as follows:
-
I. Valuation purpose: Due to the equity transfer, Jinzhong Development entrusted us to conduct a valuation on the value of its entire shareholders’ interests, in order to provide a value reference for its equity transfer.
-
II. Valuation subject and scope of valuation: The valuation subject is the entire equity interest in Jinzhong Development. The scope of valuation covers the assets and liabilities in the balance sheet of Jinzhong Development as of the appraisal reference date (exclusive of Longtian and affordable housing projects), including current assets, non-current assets, current liabilities and non-current liabilities.
-
III. Type of value: Market value.
-
IV. Appraisal reference date: 30 September 2023.
-
V. Valuation method: Asset-based approach.
– 29 –
SUMMARY OF BUSINESS VALUATION REPORT
APPENDIX II
1. BASIS OF VALUATION
The basis of valuation on which this asset valuation was conducted mainly includes the basis of economic activity, the basis of laws and regulations, the basis of valuation criteria, the basis of asset ownership, as well as the pricing basis and other reference information, as follows:
1.1 Laws and regulations
-
The Asset Appraisal Law of the People’s Republic of China (Order No. 46 of the President of the People’s Republic of China) (implemented since 1 December 2016);
-
Measures for Financial Supervision and Administration of the Asset Valuation Industry (Order No. 86 of the Ministry of Finance, implemented since 1 June 2017);
-
The Law of the People’s Republic of China on State-Owned Assets of Enterprises (passed at the 5th meeting of the Standing Committee of the 11th National People’s Congress on 28 October 2008);
-
The Company Law of the People’s Republic of China (as amended at the 6th meeting of the Standing Committee of the 13th National People’s Congress on 26 October 2018);
-
Measures for the Administration of Valuation of State-owned Assets (Order No. 91 of the State Council of 1991);
-
Implementation Rules for the Administrative Measures for Valuation of State-owned Assets (Guo Zi Ban Fa (1992) No. 36 issued by the former State-owned Assets Administration Bureau);
-
Land Administration Law of the People’s Republic of China (as amended at the 12th meeting of the Standing Committee of the 13th National People’s Congress on 26 August 2019);
-
Urban Real Estate Administration Law of the People’s Republic of China (as amended for the third time on 6 September 2019);
-
Civil Code of the People’s Republic of China (as adopted at the 3rd meeting of the 13th National People’s Congress on 28 May 2020);
– 30 –
SUMMARY OF BUSINESS VALUATION REPORT
APPENDIX II
-
Urban Planning Law of the People’s Republic of China (Order No. 23 of the President of the People’s Republic of China, 26 December 1989);
-
Provisional Regulations of the People’s Republic of China on the Grant and Transfer of the Right to Use State-owned Urban Land (Order No. 55 of the State Council, 19 May 1990);
-
Regulations for the Implementation of the Land Administration Law of the People’s Republic of China (as amended on 8 January 2011);
-
Measures of Shanxi Province for Implementation of the Land Administration Law of the People’s Republic of China (adopted at the 12th meeting of the Standing Committee of the 9th People’s Congress of Shanxi Province on 26 September 1999);
-
Provisions on Certain Issues Concerning the Administration of Valuation of State-owned Assets (Order No. 14 of the Ministry of Finance of the People’s Republic of China, implemented since 1 January 2002);
-
Provisional Regulations on the Supervision and Administration of State-owned Assets of Enterprises (Order No. 378 of the State Council of 2003, as amended by Order No. 588 of the State Council);
-
Interim Measures for the Administration of Valuation of State-owned Assets of Enterprises (Order No. 12 of SASAC, 25 August 2005);
-
Opinions of the Ministry of Finance on Reforming the Administrative Management Approach of Valuation of State-owned Assets and Strengthening the Supervision and Administration of Asset Valuation (Guo Ban Fa [2001] No. 102, 2001);
-
Notice on Relevant Issues Concerning Strengthening the Administration of Valuation of State-owned Assets of Enterprises (Guo Zi Wei Chan Quan [2006] No. 274);
-
Policies and regulations on finance, accounting, taxation and asset management of enterprises formulated by the Ministry of Finance, the Head Office of the People’s Bank of China, the State Administration of Taxation and the former State-owned Assets Administration Bureau;
-
Provisions on the Standards for Compulsory Retirement of Motor Vehicles (Ministry of Commerce, National Development and Reform Commission, Ministry of Public Security and Ministry of Environmental Protection Order [2012] No. 12);
-
Other laws and regulations related to asset appraisal.
– 31 –
SUMMARY OF BUSINESS VALUATION REPORT
APPENDIX II
-
1.2 Basis of criteria and normative documents
-
Basic Standards for Asset Valuation (Cai Zi [2017] No. 43);
-
Code of Professional Ethics for Asset Valuation (Zhong Ping Xie [2017] No. 30);
-
Practicing Standards for Asset Valuation —Asset Valuation Procedures (Zhong Ping Xie [2018] No. 36);
-
Practicing Standards for Asset Valuation —Asset Valuation Report (Zhong Ping Xie [2018] No. 35);
-
Practicing Standards for Asset Valuation —Asset Valuation Engagement Contract (Zhong Ping Xie [2017] No. 33);
-
Practicing Standards for Asset Valuation —Asset Valuation Files (Zhong Ping Xie [2018] No. 37);
-
Practicing Standards for Asset Valuation —Use of Experts’ Work and Related Reports (Zhong Ping Xie [2017] No. 35);
-
Practicing Standards for Asset Valuation —Asset Valuation Methods (Zhong Ping Xie [2019] No. 35);
-
Practicing Standards for Asset Valuation —Enterprise Value (Zhong Ping Xie [2018] No. 38);
-
Practicing Standards for Asset Valuation —Real Estate (Zhong Ping Xie [2017] No. 38);
-
Practicing Standards for Asset Valuation —Machinery and Equipment (Zhong Ping Xie [2017] No. 39);
-
Guidelines for Valuation Report of State-owned Assets of Enterprises (Zhong Ping Xie [2017] No. 42);
-
Notice of China Appraisal Society on Issuing and Amending the Practicing Standards for Asset Valuation —Enterprise Value (Zhong Ping Xie [2018] No. 38);
-
Guiding Opinions on Types of Value in Asset Valuation (Zhong Ping Xie [2017] No. 47);
-
Guiding Opinions on Legal Ownership of Asset Valuation Targets (Zhong Ping Xie [2017] No. 48);
– 32 –
SUMMARY OF BUSINESS VALUATION REPORT
APPENDIX II
-
Guidelines for Business Quality Control of Asset Valuation Institutions (Zhong Ping Xie [2017] No. 46);
-
Regulations for Evaluation of Urban Lands (GB/T18508-2001);
-
Code for Real Estate Appraisal (GB/T50291-2015);
-
Standard for Basic Terminology of Real Estate Appraisal (GB/T50899-2013);
-
Other criteria basis.
1.3 Economic behaviour documents
-
l. Meeting Minutes of the Party Working Committee of Shanxi Transformation Comprehensive Reform Demonstration Zone Jinzhong Development Zone [20l9] No. 33;
-
Meeting Minutes of the Party Committee of CPC Jinzhong Development Zone Development and Construction Group Co., Ltd. [2021] No. 16;
-
Document of Chenxing Real Estate Development Co., Ltd. (Chen Xing Fa Zhan Zi [2021] No. 14).
1.4 Ownership basis and major contract documents
-
Copies of the State-owned Land Use Certificate and the Real Estate Title Certificate;
-
Motor vehicle driving license, registration certificate, fixed assets purchase invoice;
-
Purchase and construction contracts and purchase invoices of assets to be appraised;
-
Accounting books and vouchers of assets to be appraised;
-
Other title certificates.
– 33 –
SUMMARY OF BUSINESS VALUATION REPORT
APPENDIX II
-
1.5 Basis of pricing
-
LandChina.com(中國土地市場網);
-
Recent construction project quota and material price difference documents and other relevant information;
-
Land grading and benchmark land price update technical report of Jinzhong Economic and Technological Development Zone;
-
Quotation Manual of Mechanical and Electrical Products;
-
Manual of Commonly Used Methods and Parameters for Asset Valuation;
-
Common Technical Indicators and Parameters for Asset (Price) Valuation;
-
Inquiry to manufacturers and agents and online inquiry by appraisers;
-
Other relevant valuation information recorded and collected by appraisers during field investigation;
-
Statistical data, technical standards data and price information data issued by relevant national departments
-
Information on inquiry and pricing parameters collected by us, etc.
1.6 Other basis
Jin Hua Yi Cai Shen [2023] No. 0262 (Consolidated) Audit Report of Jinzhong Development.
– 34 –
SUMMARY OF BUSINESS VALUATION REPORT
APPENDIX II
2. VALUATION METHODOLOGY
The income approach refers to a general term for various valuation methods that determine the value of the valuation subject by capitalising or discounting its expected income. The income approach includes a variety of specific methods, such as the income sharing method in the valuation of intangible assets, etc. The application of the income approach shall be subject to simultaneous satisfaction of the following three conditions: first, the future income of the valuation subject can be reasonably expected and measured in monetary terms; second, the risks associated with the expected income can be measured; third, the period of future income can be determined or reasonably expected.
The valued entity is currently in the suspension stage, and development and construction have not yet begun for the remaining land. In addition, in recent years, the economic characteristics, market structure factors, industry life cycle, industry prosperity and other factors of the real estate industry changed significantly, making it impossible to make reasonable predictions on future operations and income. Therefore, it is not appropriate to adopt the income approach for valuation.
The market approach, also known as comparison approach and market comparison approach, refers to the general term for evaluation methods that determine the value of valuation subject based on the market price of the comparable reference objects by comparing the valuation subject with comparable reference objects. The application of the market approach shall be subject to simultaneous satisfaction of the following two conditions: first, the comparable reference objects of the valuation subject are actively traded in the open market; second, necessary information of the relevant transactions is available.
Since the domestic equity transaction market is not yet fully developed, it is difficult to obtain the same or similar transaction cases from the market, and it is impossible to obtain reasonable reference data. Therefore, the market approach cannot be used.
The asset-based approach refers to the valuation method that reasonably determines the value of valuation subject by appraising the value of various assets and liabilities on and off the balance sheets, based on the balance sheet of the valued entity as of the appraisal reference date.
Given that the various assets and liabilities of the valued entity on and off the balance sheets can be identified as at the appraisal reference date, the valuation of identifiable assets and liabilities can be individually appraised by appropriate valuation approaches. As the valued entity does not have assets and liabilities which are unidentifiable and may have material impact to the valuation conclusion, the adoption of asset-based approach is the most appropriate approach for the valuation.
– 35 –
SUMMARY OF BUSINESS VALUATION REPORT
APPENDIX II
3. VALUATION CONCLUSION
Having taken into account the above factors together with the purpose of this valuation and the characteristics of the valuation subject, we adopt the asset-based approach for the valuation of the entire shareholders’ interests in Jinzhong Development.
In accordance with the valuation conducted under the asset-based approach, the valuation conclusion of the entire shareholders’ interests in Jinzhong Development as at the appraisal reference date, i.e. 30 September 2023, was as follows:
The book value of total assets was RMB3,381,031,000, the appraised value was RMB3,462,919,900 and the appreciation amount was RMB81,888,900 with the appreciation rate at 2.42%; the book value of total liabilities was RMB3,265,635,200 and the appraised value was RMB3,265,635,200, without appreciation or depreciation; the book value of net assets was RMB115,395,800, the appraised value was RMB197,284,700 and the appreciation amount was RMB81,888,900 with the appreciation rate at 70.96%.
For further details of the valuation results, please refer to the following table:
Unit: RMB0’000
| Items 1 Current assets 2 Including: inventories 3 Non-current assets 4 Including: Long-term equity investment 5 Fixed assets 6 Total assets 7 Current liabilities 8 Non-current liabilities 9 Total liabilities 10 Net assets (owners’ equities) |
Book value A 333,097.60 223,588.76 5,005.50 5,000.00 5.50 338,103.10 294,514.40 32,049.12 326,563.52 11,539.58 |
Appraised value B 340,464.74 230,955.90 5,827.25 5,786.73 40.52 346,291.99 294,514.40 32,049.12 326,563.52 19,728.47 |
Appreciation/ depreciation C=B-A 7,367.14 7,367.14 821.75 786.73 35.02 8,188.89 — — — 8,188.89 |
Appreciation/ depreciation rate (%) D=C/A×100% 2.21 3.29 16.42 15.73 636.73 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2.42 | ||||
| — — |
||||
| — | ||||
| 70.96 |
– 36 –
SUMMARY OF BUSINESS VALUATION REPORT
APPENDIX II
Upon valuation on assets and liabilities within the valuation scope by using the assets-based approach, the value of the entire equity interest in Jinzhong Development was RMB197,284,700. There were differences between the appraised value of certain assets and liabilities and their book values. The details and main reasons of the difference in the appraised value and their respective book value is attributable to the following items:
3.1 Current assets
The current assets under the scope of valuation included monetary funds, prepayments, other receivables, inventories and other current assets.
Unit: RMB
| Current assets Monetary funds Prepayments Other receivables Including: dividends receivable Inventories Other current assets Total current assets |
Book value A 17,478,518.46 12,900,078.89 957,741,208.40 61,683,500.00 2,235,887,579.41 106,968,609.83 3,330,975,994.99 |
Appraised value B 17,478,518.46 12,900,078.89 957,741,208.40 61,683,500.00 2,309,558,966.24 106,968,609.83 3,404,647,381.82 |
Appreciation/ depreciation amount C=B-A — — — 73,671,386.83 — 73,671,386.83 |
Percentage of appreciation/ depreciation (%) D=C/A×100% — — — 3.29 — |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2.21 |
– 37 –
SUMMARY OF BUSINESS VALUATION REPORT
APPENDIX II
The appraisal results of inventories (which comprised (1) development costs and (2) product development), are set out as follows:
Unit: RMB
| Current assets Development costs i. Self-operated projects ii. Entrusted construction project Product development Total inventories |
Book value A 2,207,463,237.67 155,363,809.97 2,052,099,427.70 28,424,341.74 2,235,887,579.41 |
Appraised value Appreciation/ depreciation amount B C=B-A 2,293,468,484.97 86,005,247.30 241,369,507,27 2,052,099,427.70 (Note 1) 16,090,481.27 -12,333,860.47 2,309,558,966.24 73,671,386.83 |
Percentage of appreciation/ depreciation (%) D=C/A×100% 3.90 -43.39 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3.29 |
Note:
- (1) Entrusted construction projects are excluded from the scope of valuation for the reasons stated under Special Note (II). The appraisal value for development costs is calculated by adding the appraisal value of self-operated projects and the book value of the entrusted construction projects.
Development costs under the scope of valuation comprise land acquisition price for self-operated projects, deed taxes, survey fees, design fees, construction road water and power project fees, and other infrastructure fees, engineering survey fees, etc.. Development products comprise unsold residence and commercial properties and carparking spaces from Phase I of Yijun Community (頤郡小區一期).
The reasons for appreciation of the appraisal value in respect of development costs, and the depreciation of the appraisal value in respect of product development, are as follows:
-
(1) The appreciation of development cost is mainly due to the increase in the market price of the four land parcels included therein, resulting in the appreciation of the value of such assets.
-
(2) The depreciation of product development is due to that its book value reflects the project investment cost, while the appraised value is the fair market value, which is the result after deducting subsequent transaction taxes and profits based on the market value of the project, resulting in depreciation of such assets.
– 38 –
SUMMARY OF BUSINESS VALUATION REPORT
APPENDIX II
The key quantified input values and assumptions used in the calculation of appraised values and the calculation process are as follows:
3.1.1 Development costs
3.1.1.1 Land transfer premium
According to the Regulations for Valuation on Urban Land (城鎮土地估價規程), the prevailing valuation approaches include market comparison approach, cost approximation approach, land datum value approach, residue approach, etc. A valuation approach should be selected in accordance with the Regulations for Valuation on Urban Land (城鎮土地估價規程), the development condition of the local property market as well as the specific characteristics of the valuation object and the purpose of the valuation. The market comparison approach and the residue approach are selected for the land price valuation.
Market comparison approach: It is an approach that compares the valuation object and other similar land parcels with substitution nature traded recently in market on the valuation date based on the principle of substitution and correct the differences in the transaction price of similar land parcels, thus to estimate the price of the valuation object. As the valuation object is commercial and residential land and there are many cases of similar land transfer or transfer transactions in Jinzhong City in the last three years prior to the valuation date and there are comparison examples available for selection, it is appropriate to adopt the market comparison approach for calculation. The calculation formula is as follows:
P = PB × A × B × C × D × E
Wherein:
-
P — price of land parcel subject to valuation
-
PB — price of comparison examples
-
A — transaction index of the land parcel subject to valuation/the transaction index of the land parcels as comparison examples
-
B — land price index of the land parcel subject to valuation on the valuation date/the land price of the land parcels as comparison examples on the transaction date
– 39 –
SUMMARY OF BUSINESS VALUATION REPORT
APPENDIX II
-
C — regional factor index of the land parcel subject to valuation/the regional factor index of the land parcels as comparison examples
-
D — individual factor condition index of the land parcel subject to valuation/the individual factor condition index of the land parcels as comparison examples
-
E — term correction index of the land parcel subject to valuation/term correction index of the land parcels as comparison examples
-
(A) Calculation of the residential land price of the valuation object using market comparison approach
-
(I) Land parcel 3: Jin (2018) Jin Zhong Shi Bu Dong Chan Quan No. 0006414 and land parcel 4: Jin Kai Guo Yong (2016) No. 0207004
1. Selection of comparables
- (1) Principles for selection of comparables:
As land parcel 3 and land parcel 4 are residential land, the principle of selecting the same comparables is adopted in the valuation, as detailed below:
-
In the adjacent or similar area within the same supply and demand circle of the valuation object;
-
Similar use of the valuation object;
-
The transaction price is a normal price or can be corrected to a normal price;
-
The trading date shall be close to the valuation date;
-
The comparables are normal transactions or can be corrected to normal transactions.
– 40 –
SUMMARY OF BUSINESS VALUATION REPORT
APPENDIX II
- (2) Selection of comparables:
In the valuation, the land use of land parcel 3 and land parcel 4 is set to be residential.
According to the above principles for selection of comparables, through the investigation and analysis of the land supply and demand circle of the valuation object, three normal transaction comparables, which are in the same land supply and demand circle and have similar uses and the same transaction type with the land parcel 3 and land parcel 4 and the transaction date close to the valuation date, are selected.
BASIC INFORMATION ON COMPARABLES
| Information on comparables | Information on comparables | Comparable 1 | Comparable 2 | Comparable 3 | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Project name | Project of Shanxi Chengyun Huaxing Real Estate Development Co., Ltd. at Nonggu Avenue |
Project site of Jinzhong Yuci Yongxin Real Estate Development Co., Ltd. |
Project site of Yuci City Construction Comprehensive Development Corporation |
||||||
| North of Shizhao Street, west of | |||||||||
| Location | Nonggu Avenue, VII District, | North of Anning West Street, | North of Shuncheng East | ||||||
| Science and Technology | West of Yuanqu Road | Avenue, West of Jingsi Road | |||||||
| Innovation Town | |||||||||
| Total transaction price (RMB’0,000) |
28,064 | 22,602 | 1,542 | ||||||
| Land use | Residential land | Commercial and residential land | Commercial and residential land | ||||||
| Land use life | 70 years for residential use | 40 years for commercial use and 70 years for residential use |
40 years for commercial use and 70 years for residential use |
||||||
| Construction land area (m2) | 90,850. 6 | 65,027.98 | 4,183.19 | ||||||
| Apportioned residential area (m2) |
90,850.6 | 58,525. 18 | 3,848. 53 | ||||||
| Transaction unit price (RMB/m2) |
3,089 | 3,476 | 3,686 | ||||||
| Plot ratio | 2.0 | 1.8 | 2.9 | ||||||
| Transaction method | Listing for sale | Listing for sale | Listing for sale | ||||||
| Land development degree | Seven supplies and one leveling Seven supplies and one leveling |
Seven supplies and one leveling |
– 41 –
SUMMARY OF BUSINESS VALUATION REPORT
APPENDIX II
| Information on comparables Comparable 1 Comparable 2 Comparable 3 Transaction date 2021/12/28 2022/4/21 2022/3/30 Source landchina.com (中國土地市場網) landchina.com (中國土地市場網) landchina.com (中國土地市場網) |
|
|---|---|
Among the above three comparables, the land parcel 3 and land parcel 4 are comprehensive commercial and residential land, while the land of the valuation object is for residential use, so it is required to adjust the use of comparables 2 and 3.
The price of the comparable 2 used in the valuation is the transaction price of the commercial and residential land as published on the landchina.com (中國土地市場網). The total transaction price of the comprehensive commercial and residential land is RMB226.02 million, the total land area is 65,027.98m[2] , and the transaction unit rate through calculation is RMB3,476/m[2] . After stripping and calculating the comprehensive commercial and residential land, the land prices for commercial and residential uses can be revealed respectively. According to the land transfer announcement of comparable 1, the land area of for commercial use is 6,502.8m[2] and the land area for residential use is 58,525.18m[2] . The site is located in commercial land grade 3 and residential land grade 2 of Jinzhong Development Zone. Through calculating based on the ratio of benchmark land prices (released in 2017) of commercial land (grade 3) to residential land (grade 2) (1.18:1) of the region, and stripping and calculating of the land prices of the lands for commercial use and residential use based on the proportion of commercial and residential land in comparable 2, the land price for residential use in comparable 2 is RMB3,414/m[2] .
The price of the comparable 3 used in the valuation is the transaction price of the commercial and residential land as published on the landchina.com (中國土地市場網). The total transaction price of the comprehensive commercial and residential land is RMB15.42 million, the total land area is 4,183.19m[2] , and the transaction unit rate through calculation is RMB3,686/m[2] . After stripping and calculating the comprehensive commercial and residential land, the land prices for commercial and residential uses can be revealed respectively. According to the land transfer announcement of comparable 3, the land area of for commercial use is 334.66m[2] and the land area for residential use is 3,848.53m[2] . The site is located in commercial land grade 3 and residential land grade 3 of Jinzhong Development Zone. Through calculating based on the ratio of benchmark land prices (released in 2017) of commercial land (grade 3) to residential land (grade 3) (1.65:1) of the region, and stripping and calculating of the land prices of the lands for commercial use and residential use based on the proportion of commercial and residential land in comparable 3, the land price for residential use in comparable 3 is RMB3,504/m[2] .
– 42 –
SUMMARY OF BUSINESS VALUATION REPORT
APPENDIX II
The land prices for each comparable after adjustments are as follows:
| Project name Land parcel subject to valuation Comparable 1 Comparable 2 Comparable 3 Land unit rate (RMB/m2) — 3,089 3,414 3,504 |
|
|---|---|
2. Selection of comparison factors
Based on the conditions of land parcels of the land parcel 3 and land parcel 4, the major factors affecting the price of valuation object include:
-
(1) Correction of transaction conditions: Whether it is a normal, open, fair and voluntary transaction, by correcting and exclusion of the price deviation of comparable caused by the special factors in the transaction behaviour.
-
(2) Correction of valuation date: adjust the price of the comparable on the transaction date to the price on the valuation date, and correct mainly using the land price index.
-
(3) Correction of land use life: correct the different service lives of comparables to the service life of the valuation object, to eliminate the impact of different land service lives on prices.
-
(4) Correction of regional factors: mainly including the distance from the business service center, the distance from the market, the road accessibility, the type of frontage road, and the convenience of public transportation, etc.
-
(5) Individual factors: mainly including land use, lot area, plot ratio, lot shape, topography, road conditions, land carrying capacity, land use restrictions, land development degree.
– 43 –
SUMMARY OF BUSINESS VALUATION REPORT
APPENDIX II
TABLE OF COMPARATIVE FACTORS
| Name | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Comparative Factors | Land parcel 3 | Land parcel 4 | Comparable 1 | Comparable 2 | Comparable 3 | |||||||||||
| South of | South of | North of Shizhao | ||||||||||||||
| Huazhang Street, | Huazhang Street, | Street, | West | of | North of | |||||||||||
| Project location | East of Guihua East 2nd Road, Jinzhong Development |
East of Guihua East 2nd Road, Jinzhong Development |
Nonggu Avenue, VII District, Science and Technology |
North of Anning West Street, West of Yuanqu Road |
Shuncheng East Street, West of Jingsi Road |
|||||||||||
| Zone | Zone | Innovation Town | ||||||||||||||
| Transaction date | 2023/9/30 | 2023/9/30 | 2021/12/28 | 2022/4/21 | 2022/3/30 | |||||||||||
| Prices after adjustment of use and plot ratio (RMB/m2) |
To be estimated | To be estimated | 3,089 | 3,414 | 3,504 | |||||||||||
| Normal | Normal | Normal | Normal | Normal | ||||||||||||
| Transaction condition | ||||||||||||||||
| transaction | transaction | transaction | transaction | transaction | ||||||||||||
| Land use | Residential | Residential | Residential | Residential | Residential | |||||||||||
| Land service life | 64.41 years | 62.63 years | 70 years | 70 years | 70 years |
– 44 –
SUMMARY OF BUSINESS VALUATION REPORT
APPENDIX II
| Name | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Comparative Factors | Land parcel 3 | Land parcel 4 | Comparable 1 | Comparable 2 | Comparable 3 | ||||||||
| Distance to | |||||||||||||
| business service | Relatively far | Relatively far | Relatively | far | Relatively far | Relatively far | |||||||
| center | |||||||||||||
| Distance to | |||||||||||||
| market | Relatively far | Relatively far | Relatively | far | Relatively close | Close | |||||||
| Type of frontage road |
Traffic trunk road | Branch road | Secondary trunk road |
Living | trunk road | Living trunk | road | ||||||
| Distance to bus | |||||||||||||
| station | Relatively far | Relatively far | Long | Relatively close | Close | ||||||||
| Distance to | |||||||||||||
| railway station (including high |
General | General | Relatively close | General | General | ||||||||
| speed railway) | |||||||||||||
| Distance to coach | |||||||||||||
| station | Close | Close | Relatively close | Relatively close | General | ||||||||
| Regional Factors | |||||||||||||
| Distance to | |||||||||||||
| airport | Relatively close | Relatively close | General | General | Relatively far | ||||||||
| “Seven supplies” | “Seven supplies” | “Seven supplies” | “Seven supplies” | “Seven supplies” | |||||||||
| Completeness of | outside the red | outside the red | outside the red | outside the red | outside the red | ||||||||
| infrastructures | line of land | line of land | line of land | line | of land | line of land | |||||||
| parcel | parcel | parcel | parcel | parcel | |||||||||
| Distance to | |||||||||||||
| Far | Far | Far | General | Close | |||||||||
| financial outlets | |||||||||||||
| Distance to | |||||||||||||
| hospital | General | General | Relatively | far | Relatively close | Close | |||||||
| Distance to | |||||||||||||
| primary and | Close | Close | Close | Relatively close | Close | ||||||||
| secondary schools | |||||||||||||
| Environmental | |||||||||||||
| conditions | Relatively good | Relatively good | Relatively good | Relatively good | Relatively good |
– 45 –
SUMMARY OF BUSINESS VALUATION REPORT
APPENDIX II
| Name | Name | |||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Comparative Factors | Land parcel 3 | Land parcel 4 | Comparable 1 | Comparable 2 | Comparable 3 | |||||||||||||
| Degree of | ||||||||||||||||||
| development within the land |
Set site leveling | Set site leveling | Site leveling | Site leveling | Site leveling | |||||||||||||
| parcel | ||||||||||||||||||
| Plot ratio | 2.0 | 1.8 | 2.0 | 1.8 | 2.9 | |||||||||||||
| Land parcel | General | Excellent | Relatively | Relatively | Relatively | |||||||||||||
| shape | excellent | excellent | excellent | |||||||||||||||
| Land parcel area (m2) |
36,604.55 | 12,409.27 | 90,850.6 | 58,525.18 | 3,848.53 | |||||||||||||
| Individual factors | Frontage road | Roads on four | Road on one side Roads on two |
Roads on two | Roads on two | |||||||||||||
| conditions | sides | sides | sides | sides | ||||||||||||||
| Topographic | Relatively | Relatively | Relatively | Relatively | Relatively | |||||||||||||
| conditions | excellent | excellent | excellent | excellent | excellent | |||||||||||||
| Geological | Relatively | Relatively | Relatively | Relatively | Relatively | |||||||||||||
| conditions | excellent | excellent | excellent | excellent | excellent | |||||||||||||
| Compliance with Compliance with |
Compliance with | Compliance with | Compliance with | |||||||||||||||
| Planning | the planning | the planning | the planning | the planning | the planning | |||||||||||||
| constraints | without special | without special | without special | without special | without special | |||||||||||||
| restrictions | restrictions | restrictions | restrictions | restrictions |
3. Preparation of the table of comparative factor condition indicators
(I) Land parcel 3: Jin (2018) Jin Zhong Shi Bu Dong Chan Quan No. 0006414
According to the specific conditions of various factors of the valuation object and comparables, the table of comparative factor condition indicators is prepared. The comparative factor indicators are determined as follows:
(1) Correction of valuation date
Through investigating the land market in the area of the valuation object in the past three years, the appraisers determined that the prices of the same type of land were relatively stable in the period from the date of transaction to the date of valuation, so no correction is made to the valuation date in the valuation.
– 46 –
SUMMARY OF BUSINESS VALUATION REPORT
APPENDIX II
- (2) Correction of transaction conditions
Considering the impact of transaction conditions on the land price, the transactions of the valuation object and the three comparables are normal market transactions, and the land prices are normal market prices, so it is not required to correct the transaction conditions.
(3) Correction of land service life
Correction coefficient formula of land service life: k=[1-1 ╱ (1+r)[m] ] ╱ [1-1 ╱ (1+r)[n] ]
Wherein: K- Correction coefficient of service life
-
r — Land restoration rate
-
m — Service life of land subject to valuation
-
n- Service life of comparable lands
Determination of land restoration rate r: Generally, the method of safe interest rate plus risk adjustment value is adopted. Based on the interest rate for one-year bank time deposit recently announced by the People’s Bank of China and the local social and economic development and land investment risk situation, the land restoration rate r was determined to be 6%.
The land service life of the land subject to valuation (m) is 64.41 years and the land service life of the comparable land (n) is 70 years, so it is not required to correct the land service life.
Correction of land service life of valuation object: 1-1 ╱ (1+r)[m] =1-1 ╱ (1+6%)[64.41] ≈0.9766
Correction of land service life of comparables: 1-1 ╱ (1+r)[n] =1-1 ╱ (1+6%)[70] ≈0.9831
-
(4) Correction of regional factors
-
Distance to commercial service center: The distance from the valuation object and comparables to the surrounding commercial center is divided into five grades: close, relatively close, general, relatively far and far. The valuation object is assigned with the score of 100, and 2 points are increased or decreased with the increase or decrease of one grade accordingly;
-
Distance to market: The distance from the valuation object and comparables to market is divided into five grades: close, relatively close, general, relatively far and far. The valuation object is assigned with the score of 100, and 2 points are increased or decreased with the increase or decrease of one grade accordingly;
– 47 –
SUMMARY OF BUSINESS VALUATION REPORT
APPENDIX II
-
Grade of frontage road: The frontage roads of the valuation object and comparables are divided into five grades: mixed (transportation, living) trunk road, transportation trunk road, secondary trunk road, branch road and alley. The valuation object is assigned with the score of 100, and 1 point is increased or decreased with the increase or decrease of one grade accordingly;
-
Distance to bus station: The distance from the valuation object and comparables to bus station is divided into five grades: close, relatively close, general, relatively far and far. The valuation object is assigned with the score of 100, and 2 points are increased or decreased with the increase or decrease of one grade accordingly;
-
Distance to railway station (or high speed rail station): The distance from the valuation object and comparables to railway station (or high speed rail station) is divided into five grades: close, relatively close, general, relatively far and far. The valuation object is assigned with the score of 100, and 2 points are increased or decreased with the increase or decrease of one grade accordingly;
-
Distance to coach station: The distance from the valuation object and comparables to coach station is divided into five grades: close, relatively close, general, relatively far and far. The valuation object is assigned with the score of 100, and 1 point is increased or decreased with the increase or decrease of one grade accordingly;
-
Distance to airport: The distance from the valuation object and comparables to airport is divided into five grades: close, relatively close, general, relatively far and far. The valuation object is assigned with the score of 100, and 1 point is increased or decreased with the increase or decrease of one grade accordingly;
-
Completeness of infrastructures: The completeness and guarantee degree of the surrounding power supply, water supply, drainage, gas supply, communication and other infrastructure of the valuation object and comparables are divided into five grades: excellent, relatively excellent, general, relatively poor and poor. The valuation object is assigned with the score of 100, and 2 points are increased or decreased with the increase or decrease of one grade accordingly;
-
Distance to financial outlets: The distance from the valuation object and comparables to financial outlets is divided into five grades: close, relatively close, general, relatively far and far. The valuation object is assigned with the score of 100, and 1 point is increased or decreased with the increase or decrease of one grade accordingly;
– 48 –
APPENDIX II
SUMMARY OF BUSINESS VALUATION REPORT
-
Distance to hospital: The distance from the valuation object and comparables to hospital is divided into five grades: close, relatively close, general, relatively far and far. The valuation object is assigned with the score of 100, and 1 point is increased or decreased with the increase or decrease of one grade accordingly;
-
Distance to primary and secondary schools: The distance from the valuation object and comparables to primary and secondary schools is divided into five grades: close, relatively close, general, relatively far and far. The valuation object is assigned with the score of 100, and 2 points are increased or decreased with the increase or decrease of one grade accordingly;
-
Environmental conditions: The environmental conditions of the area where the valuation object and comparables are located are divided into five grades: excellent, relatively excellent, general, relatively poor and poor. The valuation object is assigned with the score of 100, and 2 points are increased or decreased with the increase or decrease of one grade accordingly;
-
(5) Correction of individual factors
-
Degree of development within the land parcel: Correction should be made based on the degree of influence of the development degree within the land parcel on the land price. As the development degrees within the land parcels of the valuation object and comparables are “site leveling”, no correction is required.
-
Plot ratio: The correction of plot ratio should be conducted with reference to the table of correction coefficients for correction of plot ratios of residential land in the Technical Report on Land Grading and Benchmark Land Price Update of Jinzhong Economic and Technological Development Zone (reference date of 1 January 2018).
Details are as follows:
| Valuation object Valuation object Comparable 1 Comparable 2 Comparable 3 Plot ratio 2.0 2.0 1.8 2.9 Plot ratio correction coefficient 0.962 0.962 0.944 1.026 |
|
|---|---|
- Land parcel shape, depending on conditions, is divided into five grades: excellent (regular shape, reasonable land use), relatively excellent (regular shape, relatively reasonable land use), general (irregular shape, no adverse impact on land use), relatively
– 49 –
SUMMARY OF BUSINESS VALUATION REPORT
APPENDIX II
poor (irregular shape, certain impact on land use), and poor (irregular shape, serious impact on land use). The valuation object is assigned with the score of 100, and 2 points are increased or decreased with the increase or decrease of one grade accordingly;
-
Land parcel area: The land area of the valuation object and comparables is moderate and conducive to development, and thus no correction is required;
-
Frontage road conditions: the conditions are divided into degrees: roads on four sides, roads on three sides, roads on two sides, roads on one side and no frontage road. The valuation object is assigned with the score of 100, and 1 point is increased or decreased with the increase or decrease of one grade accordingly;
-
Topographic conditions: the flat degree of topography of the valuation object and comparables is divided into five grades: good, relatively good, general, relatively poor and poor. The valuation object is assigned with the score of 100, and 2 points are increased or decreased with the increase or decrease of one grade accordingly;
-
Geological conditions: mainly referring to the bearing capacity of foundation and groundwater. The bearing capacity of foundation is divided into five grades: excellent, relatively excellent, general, relatively poor and poor. The valuation object is assigned with the score of 100, and 2 points are increased or decreased with the increase or decrease of one grade accordingly;
-
Planning constraints: it is divided into two degrees: incompliance with the planning with special restrictions and compliance with the planning without special restrictions. The valuation object is assigned with the score of 100, and 2 points are increased or decreased with the increase or decrease of one grade accordingly.
TABLE OF SCORES OF COMPARATIVE FACTOR CONDITIONS
| Valuation object and comparables Comparative factors Valuation object Comparable 1 Comparable 2 Comparable 3 |
|
|---|---|
– 50 –
SUMMARY OF BUSINESS VALUATION REPORT
APPENDIX II
| Valuation object | Valuation object | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| and comparables | Valuation object | Comparable 1 | Comparable 2 | Comparable 3 | ||||||||||
| Comparative factors | ||||||||||||||
| Land | use | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | |||||||||
| Land | service life | 0.9766 | 0.9831 | 0.9831 | 0.9831 | |||||||||
| Distance to business | ||||||||||||||
| 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | |||||||||||
| service center | ||||||||||||||
| Distance to market | 100 | 100 | 104 | 106 | ||||||||||
| Type of frontage | 100 | 99 | 101 | 101 | ||||||||||
| road | ||||||||||||||
| Distance to bus | ||||||||||||||
| 100 | 98 | 104 | 106 | |||||||||||
| station | ||||||||||||||
| Distance to railway | ||||||||||||||
| station (including | 100 | 102 | 100 | 100 | ||||||||||
| high speed railway) | ||||||||||||||
| Distance to coach | ||||||||||||||
| 100 | 99 | 99 | 98 | |||||||||||
| Regional Factors | station | |||||||||||||
| Distance to airport | 100 | 99 | 99 | 98 | ||||||||||
| Completeness of | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | ||||||||||
| infrastructures | ||||||||||||||
| Distance to financial | ||||||||||||||
| 100 | 100 | 102 | 104 | |||||||||||
| outlets | ||||||||||||||
| Distance to hospital | 100 | 99 | 101 | 102 | ||||||||||
| Distance to primary | ||||||||||||||
| and secondary | 100 | 100 | 98 | 100 | ||||||||||
| schools | ||||||||||||||
| Environmental | ||||||||||||||
| 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | |||||||||||
| conditions |
– 51 –
SUMMARY OF BUSINESS VALUATION REPORT
APPENDIX II
| Valuation object | Valuation object | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| and comparables Valuation object |
Comparable 1 | Comparable 2 | Comparable 3 | ||||||||||||
| Comparative factors | |||||||||||||||
| Degree of | |||||||||||||||
| development within | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | |||||||||||
| the land parcel | |||||||||||||||
| Plot ratio | 0.962 | 0.962 | 0.944 | 1.026 | |||||||||||
| Land parcel shape | 100 | 102 | 102 | 102 | |||||||||||
| Land parcel area (m2) |
100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | |||||||||||
| Individual factors | |||||||||||||||
| Frontage road | 100 | 98 | 98 | 98 | |||||||||||
| conditions | |||||||||||||||
| Topographic | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | |||||||||||
| conditions | |||||||||||||||
| Geological | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | |||||||||||
| conditions | |||||||||||||||
| Planning constraints | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 |
4. Preparation of the table of comparative factor correction coefficients
Table of Comparative Factor Correction Coefficients
| Valuation object and | Valuation object and | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| comparables | Comparable 1 | Comparable 2 | Comparable 3 | ||||||
| Comparative factors | |||||||||
| Prices after adjustment of use and plot ratio (RMB/m2) |
3,089 | 3,414 | 3,504 | ||||||
| Transaction date | 100/100 | 100/100 | 100/100 | ||||||
| Transaction condition | 100/100 | 100/100 | 100/100 | ||||||
| Land use | 100/100 | 100/100 | 100/100 | ||||||
| Land service life | 0.9766/0.9831 | 0.9766/0.9831 | 0.9766/0.9831 |
– 52 –
SUMMARY OF BUSINESS VALUATION REPORT
APPENDIX II
| Valuation object | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| and comparables | Comparable 1 | Comparable 2 | Comparable 3 | ||||||||
| Comparative factors | |||||||||||
| Distance to business service center | 100/100 | 100/100 | 100/100 | ||||||||
| Distance to market | 100/100 | 100/104 | 100/106 | ||||||||
| Type of frontage road | 100/99 | 100/101 | 100/101 | ||||||||
| Distance to bus station | 100/98 | 100/104 | 100/106 | ||||||||
| Distance to railway | station (including high | 100/102 | 100/100 | 100/100 | |||||||
| speed railway) | |||||||||||
| Regional Factors | Distance to coach station | 100/99 | 100/99 | 100/98 | |||||||
| Distance to airport | 100/99 | 100/99 | 100/98 | ||||||||
| Completeness of infrastructures | 100/100 | 100/100 | 100/100 | ||||||||
| Distance to financial outlets | 100/100 | 100/102 | 100/104 | ||||||||
| Distance to hospital | 100/99 | 100/101 | 100/102 | ||||||||
| Distance to primary | and secondary schools | 100/100 | 100/98 | 100/100 | |||||||
| Environmental conditions | 100/100 | 100/100 | 100/100 | ||||||||
| Degree of development within the land | 100/100 | 100/100 | 100/100 | ||||||||
| parcel | |||||||||||
| Plot ratio | 0.962/0.962 | 0.962/0.944 | 0.962/1.026 | ||||||||
| Land parcel shape | 100/102 | 100/102 | 100/102 | ||||||||
| Individual factors | Land parcel area (m2) | 100/100 | 100/100 | 100/100 | |||||||
| Frontage road conditions | 100/98 | 100/98 | 100/98 | ||||||||
| Topographic conditions | 100/100 | 100/100 | 100/100 | ||||||||
| Geological conditions | 100/100 | 100/100 | 100/100 | ||||||||
| Planning constraints | 100/100 | 100/100 | 100/100 | ||||||||
| Comprehensive correction coefficient | 1.035 | 0.937 | 0.806 | ||||||||
| Benchmark price (RMB/m2) | 3,197 | 3,199 | 2,824 | ||||||||
| Appraised price of valuation object (RMB/m2) | 3,073 |
– 53 –
SUMMARY OF BUSINESS VALUATION REPORT
APPENDIX II
(II) Land parcel 4: Jin Kai Guo Yong (2016) No. 0207004
According to the specific conditions of various factors of the valuation object and comparables, the table of comparative factor condition indicators is prepared. The comparative factor indicators are determined as follows:
(1) Correction of valuation date
Through investigating the land market in the area of the valuation object in the past three years, the appraisers determined that the prices of the same type of land were relatively stable in the period from the date of transaction to the date of valuation, so no correction is made to the valuation date in the valuation.
(2) Correction of transaction conditions
Considering the impact of transaction conditions on the land price, the transactions of the valuation object and the three comparables are normal market transactions, and the land prices are normal market prices, so it is not required to correct the transaction conditions.
(3) Correction of land service life
Correction coefficient formula of land service life: k=[1-1/(1+r)[m] ]/[1-1/(1+r)[n] ]
Wherein: K–Correction coefficient of service life
r — Land restoration rate
m — Service life of land subject to valuation
n — Service life of comparable lands
Determination of land restoration rate r: Generally, the method of safe interest rate plus risk adjustment value is adopted. Based on the interest rate for one-year bank time deposit recently announced by the People’s Bank of China and the local social and economic development and land investment risk situation, the land restoration rate r was determined to be 6%.
The land service life of the land subject to valuation (m) is 62.63 years and the land service life of the comparable land (n) is 70 years, so it is not required to correct the land service life.
Correction of land service life of valuation object: 1-1/(1+r)[m] =1-1/(1+6%)[62.63] ≈0.9740
– 54 –
SUMMARY OF BUSINESS VALUATION REPORT
APPENDIX II
Correction of land service life of comparables: 1-1/(1+r)[n] =1-1/(1+6%)[70] ≈0.9831
(4) Correction of regional factors
-
① Distance to commercial service center: The distance from the valuation object and comparables to the surrounding commercial center is divided into five grades: close, relatively close, general, relatively far and far. The valuation object is assigned with the score of 100, and 2 points are increased or decreased with the increase or decrease of one grade accordingly;
-
② Distance to market: The distance from the valuation object and comparables to market is divided into five grades: close, relatively close, general, relatively far and far. The valuation object is assigned with the score of 100, and 2 points are increased or decreased with the increase or decrease of one grade accordingly;
-
③ Grade of frontage road: The frontage roads of the valuation object and comparables are divided into five grades: mixed (transportation, living) trunk road, transportation trunk road, secondary trunk road, branch road and alley. The valuation object is assigned with the score of 100, and 1 point is increased or decreased with the increase or decrease of one grade accordingly;
-
④ Distance to bus station: The distance from the valuation object and comparables to bus station is divided into five grades: close, relatively close, general, relatively far and far. The valuation object is assigned with the score of 100, and 2 points are increased or decreased with the increase or decrease of one grade accordingly;
-
⑤ Distance to railway station (or high speed rail station): The distance from the valuation object and comparables to railway station (or high speed rail station) is divided into five grades: close, relatively close, general, relatively far and far. The valuation object is assigned with the score of 100, and 2 points are increased or decreased with the increase or decrease of one grade accordingly;
-
⑥ Distance to coach station: The distance from the valuation object and comparables to coach station is divided into five grades: close, relatively close, general, relatively far and far. The valuation object is assigned with the score of 100, and 1 point is increased or decreased with the increase or decrease of one grade accordingly;
– 55 –
APPENDIX II
SUMMARY OF BUSINESS VALUATION REPORT
-
⑦ Distance to airport: The distance from the valuation object and comparables to airport is divided into five grades: close, relatively close, general, relatively far and far. The valuation object is assigned with the score of 100, and 1 point is increased or decreased with the increase or decrease of one grade accordingly;
-
⑧ Completeness of infrastructures: The completeness and guarantee degree of the surrounding power supply, water supply, drainage, gas supply, communication and other infrastructure of the valuation object and comparables are divided into five grades: excellent, relatively excellent, general, relatively poor and poor. The valuation object is assigned with the score of 100, and 2 points are increased or decreased with the increase or decrease of one grade accordingly;
-
⑨ Distance to financial outlets: The distance from the valuation object and comparables to financial outlets is divided into five grades: close, relatively close, general, relatively far and far. The valuation object is assigned with the score of 100, and 1 point is increased or decreased with the increase or decrease of one grade accordingly;
-
⑩ Distance to hospital: The distance from the valuation object and comparables to hospital is divided into five grades: close, relatively close, general, relatively far and far. The valuation object is assigned with the score of 100, and 1 point is increased or decreased with the increase or decrease of one grade accordingly;
-
Distance to primary and secondary schools: The distance from the valuation object and comparables to primary and secondary schools is divided into five grades: close, relatively close, general, relatively far and far. The valuation object is assigned with the score of 100, and 2 points are increased or decreased with the increase or decrease of one grade accordingly;
-
Environmental conditions: The environmental conditions of the area where the valuation object and comparables are located are divided into five grades: excellent, relatively excellent, general, relatively poor and poor. The valuation object is assigned with the score of 100, and 2 points are increased or decreased with the increase or decrease of one grade accordingly;
(6) Correction of individual factors
- ① Degree of development within the land parcel: Correction should be made based on the degree of influence of the development degree within the land parcel on the land price. As the development degrees within the land parcels of the valuation object and comparables are “site leveling”, no correction is required.
– 56 –
SUMMARY OF BUSINESS VALUATION REPORT
APPENDIX II
- ② Plot ratio: The correction of plot ratio should be conducted with reference to the table of correction coefficients for correction of plot ratios of residential land in the Technical Report on Land Grading and Benchmark Land Price Update of Jinzhong Economic and Technological Development Zone (reference date of 1 January 2018).
Details are as follows:
| Valuation object Valuation object Comparable 1 Comparable 2 Comparable 3 Plot ratio 1.8 2.0 1.8 2.9 Plot ratio correction coefficient 0.944 0.962 0.944 1.026 |
|
|---|---|
-
③ Land parcel shape, depending on conditions, is divided into five grades: excellent (regular shape, reasonable land use), relatively excellent (regular shape, relatively reasonable land use), general (irregular shape, no adverse impact on land use), relatively poor (irregular shape, certain impact on land use), and poor (irregular shape, serious impact on land use). The valuation object is assigned with the score of 100, and 2 points are increased or decreased with the increase or decrease of one grade accordingly;
-
④ Land parcel area: The land area of the valuation object and comparables is moderate and conducive to development, and thus no correction is required;
-
⑤ Frontage road conditions: the conditions are divided into degrees: roads on four sides, roads on three sides, roads on two sides, roads on one side and no frontage road. The valuation object is assigned with the score of 100, and 1 point is increased or decreased with the increase or decrease of one grade accordingly;
-
⑥ Topographic conditions: the flat degree of topography of the valuation object and comparables is divided into five grades: good, relatively good, general, relatively poor and poor. The valuation object is assigned with the score of 100, and 2 points are increased or decreased with the increase or decrease of one grade accordingly;
-
⑦ Geological conditions: mainly referring to the bearing capacity of foundation and groundwater. The bearing capacity of foundation is divided into five grades: excellent, relatively excellent, general, relatively poor and poor. The valuation object is assigned with the score of 100, and 2 points are increased or decreased with the increase or decrease of one grade accordingly;
– 57 –
SUMMARY OF BUSINESS VALUATION REPORT
APPENDIX II
- ⑧ Planning constraints: it is divided into two degrees: incompliance with the planning with special restrictions and compliance with the planning without special restrictions. The valuation object is assigned with the score of 100, and 2 points are increased or decreased with the increase or decrease of one grade accordingly.
Table of Scores of Comparative Factor Conditions
| Valuation object and | Valuation object and | Valuation object and | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| comparables | Valuation object | Comparable 1 | Comparable 2 | Comparable 3 | |||||||||
| Comparative factors | |||||||||||||
| Prices after adjustment of use (RMB/㎡) | — | 3,089 | 3,414 | 3,504 | |||||||||
| Transaction date | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | |||||||||
| Transaction condition | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | |||||||||
| Land use | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | |||||||||
| Land service life | 0.9740 | 0.9831 | 0.9831 | 0.9831 |
– 58 –
SUMMARY OF BUSINESS VALUATION REPORT
APPENDIX II
| Valuation object and | Valuation object and | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| comparables | Valuation object | Comparable 1 | Comparable 2 | Comparable 3 | ||||||||||
| Comparative factors | ||||||||||||||
| Distance to business | ||||||||||||||
| 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | |||||||||||
| service center | ||||||||||||||
| Distance to market | 100 | 100 | 104 | 106 | ||||||||||
| Type of frontage | 100 | 101 | 103 | 103 | ||||||||||
| road | ||||||||||||||
| Distance to bus | ||||||||||||||
| 100 | 98 | 104 | 106 | |||||||||||
| station | ||||||||||||||
| Distance to railway | ||||||||||||||
| station (including | 100 | 102 | 100 | 100 | ||||||||||
| high speed railway) | ||||||||||||||
| Distance to coach | ||||||||||||||
| 100 | 99 | 99 | 98 | |||||||||||
| Regional Factors | station | |||||||||||||
| Distance to airport | 100 | 99 | 99 | 98 | ||||||||||
| Completeness of | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | ||||||||||
| infrastructures | ||||||||||||||
| Distance to financial | ||||||||||||||
| 100 | 100 | 102 | 104 | |||||||||||
| outlets | ||||||||||||||
| Distance to hospital | 100 | 99 | 101 | 102 | ||||||||||
| Distance to primary | ||||||||||||||
| and secondary | 100 | 100 | 98 | 100 | ||||||||||
| schools | ||||||||||||||
| Environmental | ||||||||||||||
| 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | |||||||||||
| conditions |
– 59 –
SUMMARY OF BUSINESS VALUATION REPORT
APPENDIX II
| Valuation object and | Valuation object and | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| comparables Valuation object |
Comparable 1 | Comparable 2 | Comparable 3 | ||||||||||||
| Comparative factors | |||||||||||||||
| Degree of | |||||||||||||||
| development within | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | |||||||||||
| the land parcel | |||||||||||||||
| Plot ratio | 0.944 | 0.962 | 0.944 | 1.026 | |||||||||||
| Land parcel shape | 100 | 98 | 98 | 98 | |||||||||||
| Land parcel area | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | |||||||||||
| (㎡) | |||||||||||||||
| Individual factors | |||||||||||||||
| Frontage road | 100 | 101 | 101 | 101 | |||||||||||
| conditions | |||||||||||||||
| Topographic | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | |||||||||||
| conditions | |||||||||||||||
| Geological | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | |||||||||||
| conditions | |||||||||||||||
| Planning constraints | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 |
4. Preparation of the table of comparative factor correction coefficients
Table of Comparative Factor Correction Coefficients
| Valuation object and | Valuation object and | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| comparables | Comparable 1 | Comparable 2 | Comparable 3 | ||||||||
| Comparative factors | |||||||||||
| Prices after adjustment of use (RMB/㎡) | 3,089 | 3,414 | 3,504 | ||||||||
| Transaction date | 100/100 | 100/100 | 100/100 | ||||||||
| Transaction condition | 100/100 | 100/100 | 100/100 | ||||||||
| Land use | 100/100 | 100/100 | 100/100 | ||||||||
| Land service life | 0.9740/0.9831 | 0.9740/0.9831 | 0.9740/0.9831 |
– 60 –
SUMMARY OF BUSINESS VALUATION REPORT
APPENDIX II
| Valuation object and | Valuation object and | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| comparables | Comparable 1 | Comparable 2 | Comparable 3 | ||||||
| Comparative factors | |||||||||
| Distance to business service | center | 100/100 | 100/100 | 100/100 | |||||
| Distance to market | 100/100 | 100/104 | 100/106 | ||||||
| Type of frontage road | 100/101 | 100/103 | 100/103 | ||||||
| Distance to bus station | 100/98 | 100/104 | 100/106 | ||||||
| Distance to railway station (including high | 100/102 | 100/100 | 100/100 | ||||||
| speed railway) | |||||||||
| Regional Factors | Distance to coach station | 100/99 | 100/99 | 100/98 | |||||
| Distance to airport | 100/99 | 100/99 | 100/98 | ||||||
| Completeness of infrastructures | 100/100 | 100/100 | 100/100 | ||||||
| Distance to financial outlets | 100/100 | 100/102 | 100/104 | ||||||
| Distance to hospital | 100/99 | 100/101 | 100/102 | ||||||
| Distance to primary and secondary schools | 100/100 | 100/98 | 100/100 | ||||||
| Environmental conditions | 100/100 | 100/100 | 100/100 | ||||||
| Degree of development within the land | 100/100 | 100/100 | 100/100 | ||||||
| parcel | |||||||||
| Plot ratio | 0.944/0.962 | 0.944/0.944 | 0.944/1.026 | ||||||
| Land parcel shape | 100/98 | 100/98 | 100/98 | ||||||
| Individual factors | Land parcel area (㎡) | 100/100 | 100/100 | 100/100 | |||||
| Frontage road conditions | 100/101 | 100/101 | 100/101 | ||||||
| Topographic conditions | 100/100 | 100/100 | 100/100 | ||||||
| Geological conditions | 100/100 | 100/100 | 100/100 | ||||||
| Planning constraints | 100/100 | 100/100 | 100/100 | ||||||
| Comprehensive correction coefficient | 1.003 | 0.908 | 0.781 | ||||||
| Benchmark price (RMB/㎡) | 3,098 | 3,100 | 2,737 | ||||||
| Appraised price of valuation object (RMB/㎡) | 2,978 |
– 61 –
SUMMARY OF BUSINESS VALUATION REPORT
APPENDIX II
(B) Calculation of the residential land price of the valuation object using residue approach
Residue approach: also known as retrograde approach, residual approach or residual value approach, it is an approach to determine the land price of the valuation object with the price balance on the basis of estimating the normal transaction price of the real estate after the completion of development, after deducting the construction cost of the normal development of the building and professional fees, interest, profit, tax and other expenses related to the construction and sale of the building. According to the planning conditions, the value and development cost of the valuation object after the completion of the future development are relatively easy to estimate, which has the prerequisite of using the residue approach. Therefore, it is advisable to use the residue approach for calculation, and the calculation formula is as follows:
V=A-B-C
Wherein:
-
V — price of the lance parcel subject to valuation
-
A — total price of the real estate
-
B — overall development cost of the development project
-
C — Objective development profit
(I) Land parcel 3: Jin (2018) Jin Zhong Shi Bu Dong Chan Quan No. 0006414
1. Assumptions for the valuation
The valuation adopts the static analysis method of hypothetical development; it is assumed that the valuation object can successfully complete the expected development and construction goals, and the project construction cycle is 3.0 years; it is assumed that the construction and installation costs are invested evenly during the project cycle, and the interest is calculated based on compound interest. Although the payment of the total price of real estates and various costs occurs in the future, all data of the total price of real estates and the costs used in the residue approach valuation are future data determined based on their current level. It is assumed that the key variables involved in the residue approach valuation will not change significantly during the development period, and the project will be sold out after completion.
– 62 –
SUMMARY OF BUSINESS VALUATION REPORT
APPENDIX II
2. Determination of the best method to develop and utilize land
In the valuation, the best development and utilization method is determined according to the planning conditions of the land parcel subject to valuation. Ordinary residential buildings are constructed with supporting commercial real estates, equipped with water supply, sewage, electricity, heating, telecommunication, gas and other infrastructure. It is assumed that the residential buildings are delivered in the “state of simple decoration of public parts and roughcast interior”.
The total area of the land parcel subject to valuation is 41,690.83m[2] , of which the apportioned area for residential land is 36,604.55m[2] and the apportioned area for commercial land is 5,086.28m[2] . The plot ratio is assumed to be 2.0, then:
Planned residential buildings GFA = 36,604.55 × 2.0 ≈ 73,209.10 (m[2] )
3. Calculation of the value of the valuation object after development is completed
Through the investigation of real estate market in the area where the land parcel subject to valuation is located in the past year, and in combination with the residential sales market conditions of surrounding buildings of the land parcel subject to valuation, the appraisers determined after comparative analysis that the average selling price of ordinary residential buildings on the land parcel subject to valuation is RMB6,700/m[2] by selecting sales cases of residential real estates of the same area, the same type of property, similar use and the same structure as the valuation object and in combination with the actual conditions of the valuation object:
Value of the real estate after development completed = selling price × GFA
Value of ordinary residential real estate = 6,700 x 73,209.10 ≈ 49,050.10 (RMB’0,000)
4. Calculation of land acquisition tax
Land acquisition tax includes deed tax of 3% and stamp tax of 0.5‰, etc., totaling 0.0305V (assuming V is the land parcel price of the valuation object).
5. Calculation of housing construction cost
The construction cost of the housings built by the valuation object is estimated based on the planning conditions, ancillary facilities and decoration (excluding indoor) and other design standards of the valuation object abovementioned.
– 63 –
SUMMARY OF BUSINESS VALUATION REPORT
APPENDIX II
Construction Cost Calculation Sheet
| No. | Item | Item | Amount | Explanation | Explanation | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (RMB/m2) | ||||||||
| 1 | Construction and installation costs | 2,300 | It includes the civil engineering cost, | |||||
| installation cost, decoration cost and other | ||||||||
| costs incurred in the construction of buildings | ||||||||
| and ancillary works. The construction and | ||||||||
| installation costs are determined to be | ||||||||
| RMB2,300/m2 according to the relevant quota, | ||||||||
| with reference to the investment of similar | ||||||||
| buildings and in combination with the local | ||||||||
| actual conditions during the valuation. | ||||||||
| 2 | Exploration, design | and preliminary | 115 | It includes preliminary | research fees (including | |||
| engineering costs | market research fee, feasibility study fee, | |||||||
| project planning fee), exploration and design | ||||||||
| cost (including project exploration cost, | ||||||||
| environmental impact assessment fee, traffic | ||||||||
| impact assessment fee, | planning and design | |||||||
| fee), construction project bidding fee and the | ||||||||
| necessary expenses for | preliminary work such | |||||||
| as “three supplies and one leveling” at the | ||||||||
| construction site and temporary housing. Based | ||||||||
| on the scale, complexity and building structure | ||||||||
| of projects of the valuation object, the | ||||||||
| valuation is calculated at 5% of the | ||||||||
| construction and installation costs. | ||||||||
| 3 | Infrastructure construction cost | 230 | It refers to the construction cost for ancillary | |||||
| roads, water supply, drainage, electricity, | ||||||||
| communications, gas, heating and other | ||||||||
| facilities required by urban planning from the | ||||||||
| project land red line to | the building base. | |||||||
| Based on the construction and installation | ||||||||
| costs, it is generally determined at a ratio of | ||||||||
| 5%-15%. Based on the | scale, complexity and | |||||||
| building structure of projects of the valuation | ||||||||
| object, the valuation is | calculated at 10% of the | |||||||
| construction and installation costs. |
– 64 –
SUMMARY OF BUSINESS VALUATION REPORT
APPENDIX II
| No. | No. | Item | Amount | Explanation | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (RMB/m2) | |||||||||||
| 4 | Public facilities cost | 115 | Public facilities | construction cost refers to the | |||||||
| cost for municipal public facilities and green | |||||||||||
| spaces in residential areas, mainly including | |||||||||||
| education, medical and health, culture and | |||||||||||
| sports, commercial services, administrative | |||||||||||
| management and community services and green | |||||||||||
| spaces. According to relevant national | |||||||||||
| requirements and with reference to the local | |||||||||||
| public facilities | cost of similar buildings, it is | ||||||||||
| generally calculated as 5% of the construction | |||||||||||
| and installation | costs. | ||||||||||
| 5 | Taxes | and unforeseen fees during development | 115 | Including relevant taxes and fees charged by | |||||||
| local governments or their relevant | |||||||||||
| departments, such as greening construction | |||||||||||
| cost, civil air defense project fee, urban | |||||||||||
| temporary land fee, municipal and cultural | |||||||||||
| pipeline apportionment fee, initial telephone | |||||||||||
| installation fee, | decentralized construction of | ||||||||||
| municipal public facilities construction cost, | |||||||||||
| construction waste disposal fee and other | |||||||||||
| expenses. They are generally determined at a | |||||||||||
| ratio of 2%-5% | based on the construction and | ||||||||||
| installation costs and taking into account | |||||||||||
| unforeseen fees. | This item is calculated at 5% | ||||||||||
| of the construction and installation costs. | |||||||||||
| 6 | Unit price of construction cost | 2,875 | Unit price of housing construction cost = | ||||||||
| construction and installation costs + | |||||||||||
| exploration, design and preliminary engineering | |||||||||||
| costs + infrastructure construction cost + public | |||||||||||
| facilities construction cost + taxes and | |||||||||||
| unforeseen fees | during development. |
Total residential construction cost = 2,875×73,209.10 ≈ 21,047.62 (RMB’0,000)
– 65 –
SUMMARY OF BUSINESS VALUATION REPORT
APPENDIX II
6. Calculation of management expense
Management expense refers to the expenditure of real estate developers necessary for organizing and managing real estate development and operation activities, including staff wage and welfare fee, office expense and travel expense of real estate developers. Management expense is generally calculated at a certain proportion of the construction cost (usually 3%-4%). Management expense is calculated at 3% of the construction cost during the valuation. The valuation assumes the residential land value as V.
Management expense = (21,047.62+1.0305V) × 3%
≈ 631.43 + 3.1%V (RMB’0,000)
7. Calculation of sales expense
It refers to the expense necessary for pre-sale of the real estate that will be developed in the future or for sale of the real estate that has been developed, including advertising fee, sales materials production fee, model housing or model room construction cost, sales office construction cost, sales personnel expense or sales agent fee. Based on the value after development is completed, and in combination with the situation of this project, sales expense is calculated at 3% of the value after development is completed during the valuation, then:
Sales expense = 49,050.10 × 3% ≈ 1,471.50 (RMB’0,000)
8. Calculation of investment interest
The development cycle and interest rate of real estate are determined based on the actual conditions. Based on the total prepaid capital (including the desired land value, land acquisition tax, housing construction cost and management expense and sales expense), and according to the situation of the valuation object, the project construction cycle is assumed to be 3.0 years. Assuming that the land value V and land acquisition tax are invested in lump sum at the beginning of the construction cycle, housing construction cost and management expense and sales expense are invested evenly during the construction cycle, and the interest rate takes the 1-5 years loan interest rate of 4.75% implemented from 24 October 2015, as calculated based on compound interest, then:
Investment interest = (land price + land acquisition tax) × [(1 + interest rate)[3] -1] + (housing construction cost + management expense + sales expense) × [(1 + interest rate)[3/2] -1] = V × (1+3.05%) × [(1+4.75%)[3] -1] + (21,047.62+631.43+3.1%V+1,471.50) × [(l+4.75%)[3/2] -1]
- ≈ 16,68.91 + 0.1562V (RMB’0,000)
– 66 –
SUMMARY OF BUSINESS VALUATION REPORT
APPENDIX II
9. Calculation of sales tax
Sales tax refers to the tax paid by the seller for pre-sale or sale of the real estate after development is completed, including value-added tax, urban construction and maintenance tax, education surcharge and stamp duty. Through investigation and calculation, it was determined that the total cost of this item is about 5.4% of the value of the real estate after development is completed, and 5.4% is taken for the valuation.
Sales tax = 49,050.10 × 5.4% ≈ 2,648.71 (RMB’0,000)
10. Calculation of development profit
Profit refers to the average profit that real estate developers can obtain from real estate developments under normal conditions. The valuation takes sales profit to calculate its development profit. Based on the scale of buildings of the valuation object and other conditions, 15% is taken with reference to the average level of good sales profit margin of real estate developers published in the Enterprise Performance Valuation Standard Value in the past five years, and in combination with the average sales profit margin of the local residential real estate development industry, then:
Profit = total price after development completed × profit margin = 49,050.10 × 15% ≈ 7,357.52 (RMB’0,000)
11. Calculation of land price
Land price = value after development completed — (land acquisition tax + housing construction cost + management expense + sales expense + investment interest + sales tax) — profit, then:
V = 49,050.10 — (3.05%V + 21,047.62 + 631.43 + 3.1%V + 1,471.50 + 1,668.91 + 0.1562V + 2,648.71) — 7,357.52
- ≈ 11,681.37 (RMB’0,000)
Residential land unit price = total land price ÷ land area
-
= 11,681.37 × 10,000 ÷ 36,604.55
-
≈ 3,191 (RMB/m[2] )
– 67 –
SUMMARY OF BUSINESS VALUATION REPORT
APPENDIX II
Land parcel 4: Jin Kai Guo Yong (2016) No. 0207004
1. Assumptions for the valuation
The valuation adopts the static analysis method of hypothetical development; it is assumed that the valuation object can successfully complete the expected development and construction goals, and the project construction cycle is 3.0 years; it is assumed that the construction and installation costs are invested evenly during the project cycle, and the interest is calculated based on compound interest. Although the payment of the total price of real estates and various costs occurs in the future, all data of the total price of real estates and the costs used in the residue approach valuation are future data determined based on their current level. It is assumed that the key variables involved in the residue approach valuation will not change significantly during the development period, and the project will be sold out after completion.
2. Determination of the best method to develop and utilize land
In the valuation, the best development and utilization method is determined according to the planning conditions of the land parcel subject to valuation. Ordinary residential buildings are constructed with supporting commercial real estates, equipped with water supply, sewage, electricity, heating, telecommunication, gas and other infrastructure. It is assumed that the residential buildings are delivered in the “state of simple decoration of public parts and roughcast interior”.
The total area of the land parcel subject to valuation is 12,409.27m[2] and the plot ratio is assumed to be 1.8, then:
Planned residential buildings GFA=36,604.55×1.8≈22,336.69 (m[2] )
3. Calculation of the value of the valuation object after development is completed
Through the investigation of real estate market in the area where the land parcel subject to valuation is located in the past year, and in combination with the residential sales market conditions of surrounding buildings of the land parcel subject to valuation, the appraisers determined after comparative analysis that the average selling price of ordinary residential buildings on the land parcel subject to valuation is RMB6,700/m[2] by selecting sales cases of residential real estates of the same area, the same type of property, similar use and the same structure as the valuation object and in combination with the actual conditions of the valuation object:
– 68 –
SUMMARY OF BUSINESS VALUATION REPORT
APPENDIX II
Value of the real estate after development completed = selling price ×GFA
Value of ordinary residential real estate=6,700×22,336.69≈14,965.58 (RMB’0,000)
4. Calculation of land acquisition tax
Land acquisition tax includes deed tax of 3% and stamp tax of 0.5‰, etc., totaling 0.0305V (assuming V is the land parcel price of the valuation object).
5. Calculation of housing construction cost
The construction cost of the housings built by the valuation object is estimated based on the planning conditions, ancillary facilities and decoration (excluding indoor) and other design standards of the valuation object abovementioned.
Construction Cost Calculation Sheet
Amount No. Item Explanation (RMB/m[2] ) It includes the civil engineering cost, installation cost, decoration cost and other costs incurred in the construction of buildings and ancillary works. The Construction construction and installation costs are determined to be 1 and installation 2,300 RMB2,300/m[2] according to the relevant quota, with costs reference to the investment of similar buildings and in combination with the local actual conditions during the valuation. It includes preliminary research fees (including market research fee, feasibility study fee, project planning fee), exploration and design cost (including project exploration Exploration, cost, environmental impact assessment fee, traffic impact design and assessment fee, planning and design fee), construction 2 preliminary 115 project bidding fee and the necessary expenses for engineering preliminary work such as “three supplies and one costs leveling” at the construction site and temporary housing. Based on the scale, complexity and building structure of projects of the valuation object, the valuation is calculated at 5% of the construction and installation costs.
– 69 –
SUMMARY OF BUSINESS VALUATION REPORT
APPENDIX II
It refers to the construction cost for ancillary roads, water supply, drainage, electricity, communications, gas, heating and other facilities required by urban planning from the Infrastructure project land red line to the building base. Based on the 3 construction 230 construction and installation costs, it is generally cost determined at a ratio of 5%-15%. Based on the scale, complexity and building structure of projects of the valuation object, the valuation is calculated at 10% of the construction and installation costs. Public facilities construction cost refers to the cost for municipal public facilities and green spaces in residential areas, mainly including education, medical and health, culture and sports, commercial services, administrative Public facilities 4 115 management and community services and green spaces. cost According to relevant national requirements and with reference to the local public facilities cost of similar buildings, it is generally calculated as 5% of the construction and installation costs. Including relevant taxes and fees charged by local governments or their relevant departments, such as greening construction cost, civil air defense project fee, urban temporary land fee, municipal and cultural pipeline Taxes and apportionment fee, initial telephone installation fee, unforeseen fees 5 115 decentralized construction of municipal public facilities during construction cost, construction waste disposal fee and development other expenses. They are generally determined at a ratio of 2%-5% based on the construction and installation costs and taking into account unforeseen fees. This item is calculated at 5% of the construction and installation costs. Unit price of housing construction cost = construction and Unit price of installation costs + exploration, design and preliminary 6 construction 2,875 engineering costs + infrastructure construction cost + cost public facilities construction cost + taxes and unforeseen fees during development.
Total residential construction cost=2,875×22,336.69≈6,421.80 (RMB’0,000)
– 70 –
SUMMARY OF BUSINESS VALUATION REPORT
APPENDIX II
6. Calculation of management expense
Management expense refers to the expenditure of real estate developers necessary for organizing and managing real estate development and operation activities, including staff wage and welfare fee, office expense and travel expense of real estate developers. Management expense is generally calculated at a certain proportion of the construction cost (usually 3%-4%). Management expense is calculated at 3% of the construction cost during the valuation. The valuation assumes the residential land value as V.
Management expense=(6,421.80+1.0305V)×3%
≈192.65+ 3.1%V (RMB’0,000)
7. Calculation of sales expense
It refers to the expense necessary for pre-sale of the real estate that will be developed in the future or for sale of the real estate that has been developed, including advertising fee, sales materials production fee, model housing or model room construction cost, sales office construction cost, sales personnel expense or sales agent fee. Based on the value after development is completed, and in combination with the situation of this project, sales expense is calculated at 3% of the value after development is completed during the valuation, then:
Sales expense =14,965.58×3%≈448.97 (RMB’0,000)
8. Calculation of investment interest
The development cycle and interest rate of real estate are determined based on the actual conditions. Based on the total prepaid capital (including the desired land value, land acquisition tax, housing construction cost and management expense and sales expense), and according to the situation of the valuation object, the project construction cycle is assumed to be 3.0 years. Assuming that the land value V and land acquisition tax are invested in lump sum at the beginning of the construction cycle, housing construction cost and management expense and sales expense are invested evenly during the construction cycle, and the interest rate takes the 1-5 years loan interest rate of 4.75% implemented from 24 October 2015, as calculated based on compound interest, then:
– 71 –
SUMMARY OF BUSINESS VALUATION REPORT
APPENDIX II
Investment interest = (land price + land acquisition tax) ×[(1 + interest rate)[3] -1] + (housing construction cost + management expense + sales expense) ×[(1 + interest rate)[3/2] -1]
=V×(1+3.05%)×[(1+4.75%)[3] -1]+( 6,421.80+192.65+3.1%V+448.97)×[(1+4.75%)[3/2] -1]
≈509.20+0.1562V (RMB’0,000)
9. Calculation of sales tax
Sales tax refers to the tax paid by the seller for pre-sale or sale of the real estate after development is completed, including value-added tax, urban construction and maintenance tax, education surcharge and stamp duty. Through investigation and calculation, it was determined that the total cost of this item is about 5.4% of the value of the real estate after development is completed, and 5.4% is taken for the valuation.
Sales tax = 14,965.58×5.4%≈808.14 (RMB’0,000)
10. Calculation of development profit
Profit refers to the average profit that real estate developers can obtain from real estate developments under normal conditions. The valuation takes sales profit to calculate its development profit. Based on the scale of buildings of the valuation object and other conditions, 15% is taken with reference to the average level of good sales profit margin of real estate developers published in the Enterprise Performance Valuation Standard Value in the past five years, and in combination with the average sales profit margin of the local residential real estate development industry, then:
Profit = total price after development completed × profit margin=14,965.58×15%≈2,244.84 (RMB’0,000)
– 72 –
SUMMARY OF BUSINESS VALUATION REPORT
APPENDIX II
11. Calculation of land price
Land price = value after development completed (land acquisition tax + housing construction cost + management expense + sales expense + investment interest + sales tax) profit, then:
V=14,965.58-(3.05%V+6,421.80+192.65+3.1%V+448.97+509.20+0.1562V +808.14)-2,244.84
≈3,564.08 (RMB’0,000)
Residential land unit price = total land price ÷land area
=3,564.08×10,000÷12,409.27
- ≈2,872 (RMB/m[2] )
12. Determination of valuation result of land price
(1) Method for determination of land price
| Land use Unit land price in valuation results (RMB/m2) Market comparison approach Residue approach Residential 2,978 2,872 |
|
|---|---|
According to the technical regulations for land price valuation and the specific conditions of the land subject to valuation, the valuation results are as follows:
The appraisers are of the view that: the calculation principles of market comparison approach and cost approximation approach are different. Both approaches can reflect the land price of valuation object from different aspects, and there is little difference in the calculation results of the two approaches. Therefore, the simple arithmetic average of the two calculation results is used to determine the final price in the valuation (i.e. calculation weight of 50% for each), as detailed in the following table:
– 73 –
SUMMARY OF BUSINESS VALUATION REPORT
APPENDIX II
| Land use | Market comparison approach Residue approach Area of land parcel (m2) Calculation results (RMB/m2) Weight Calculation results (RMB/m2) Weight |
Unit land price Total land price (RMB’0,000) RMB/m2 RMB’0,000/ Mu 2,925 195.00 3,446.76 |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Residential | 2,978 50% 2,872 50% 12,409.27 |
(2) Valuation results
After investigation and analysis of the land parcel of the valuation object and the area in which it is located, the appraisers calculated the market price of the land use right using a scientific valuation approach in accordance with the basic principles of land appraisal and relevant laws and regulations, based on the conditions of the valuation date, the set development degree, the set use, the set land use and current conditions, and the set term conditions:
| Real Estate Title Certificate No. Use Area of land parcel (m2) Unit land price (RMB/m2) Total price (RMB’0,000) Jin Kai Guo Yong (2016) No. 0207004 Residential 12,409.27 (equivalent to 18.61 Mu) 2,925 (equivalent to RMB1,950,000/Mu) 3,629.71 |
|
|---|---|
-
(C) Calculation of the commercial land price of the valuation object using market comparison approach
-
(I) Land parcel 1: Jin Kai Guo Yong (2016) No. 0207003, land parcel 2: Jin Kai Guo Yong (2016) No. 0207005 and land parcel 3: Jin (2018) Jin Zhong Shi Bu Dong Chan Quan No. 0006414
1. Selection of comparables
As land parcel 1, land parcel 2 and land parcel 3 are commercial land, the principle of selecting the same comparables is adopted in the valuation, as detailed below:
-
(1) Principles for selection of comparables:
-
In the adjacent or similar area within the same supply and demand circle of the valuation object;
– 74 –
SUMMARY OF BUSINESS VALUATION REPORT
APPENDIX II
-
Similar use of the valuation object;
-
The transaction price is a normal price or can be corrected to a normal price;
-
The trading date shall be close to the valuation date;
-
The comparables are normal transactions or can be corrected to normal transactions.
-
(2) Selection of comparables:
In the valuation, the land use is set to be commercial.
According to the above principles for selection of comparables, through the investigation and analysis of the land supply and demand circle of the valuation object, three normal transaction comparables, which are in the same land supply and demand circle and have similar uses and the same transaction type with the valuation object and the transaction date close to the valuation date, are selected.
BASIC INFORMATION ON COMPARABLES
| Information on comparables | Information on comparables | Comparable 1 | Comparable 1 | Comparable 2 | Comparable 2 | Comparable 3 | Comparable 3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Koucun commercial and | ||||||||||
| Project name | Shanxi Yiboyuan Business Management Co., Ltd. |
Jinzhong Yuci Yongxin Real Estate Development Co., Ltd. residential project in Jinzhong Development Zone of Jinzhong Chenjiu Real Estate |
||||||||
| Development Co., Ltd. | ||||||||||
| Location | West of the former Yutai Road, southeast of the former Yuci |
North of Anning West Street, West of Jingxi Avenue, north of |
||||||||
| Fertilizer Plant | west of Yuanqu Road | Chuangye Street | ||||||||
| Total transaction price (RMB’0,000) |
746 | 22,602 | 27,750 | |||||||
| Land use | Land for hotel | Commercial and residential land Commercial and residential land |
||||||||
| Land use life | 40 years for commercial use | 40 years for commercial use and 70 years for residential use 40 years for commercial use and 70 years for residential use |
||||||||
| Construction land area (m2) | 2,077.54 | 65,027.98 | 97,174.43 |
– 75 –
SUMMARY OF BUSINESS VALUATION REPORT
APPENDIX II
| Information on comparables | Comparable 1 | Comparable 2 | Comparable 3 | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apportioned commercial area (m2) |
2,077.54 | 6,502.8 | 97,17.44 | ||||||||
| Transaction unit price (RMB/m2) |
3,591 | 3,476 | 2,856 | ||||||||
| Maximum plot ratio | 2.5 | 1.8 | 2.7 | ||||||||
| Transaction method | Listing for sale | Listing for sale | Listing for sale | ||||||||
| Land development degree | Seven supplies and one leveling | Seven supplies and one leveling | Seven supplies and one leveling | ||||||||
| Transaction date | 2023/4/20 | 2022/4/21 | 2021/5/14 | ||||||||
| landchina.com | landchina.com | landchina.com | |||||||||
| Source | (中國土地市場網) | (中國土地市場網) | (中國土地市場網) |
Among the above three comparables, the land of comparables 2 and 3 are comprehensive commercial and residential land, while the portion of land of the valuation object is for commercial use, so it is required to adjust the use of comparables 2 and 3.
The price of the comparable 2 used in the valuation is the transaction price of the commercial and residential land as published on the landchina.com (中國土地市場網). The total transaction price of the comprehensive commercial and residential land is RMB226.02 million, the total land area is 65,027.98m[2] , and the transaction unit rate through calculation is RMB3,476/m[2] . After stripping and calculating the comprehensive commercial and residential land, the land prices for commercial and residential uses can be revealed respectively. According to the land transfer announcement of comparable 1, the land area of for commercial use is 6,502.8m[2] and the land area for residential use is 58,525.18m[2] . The site is located in commercial land grade 3 and residential land grade 2 of Jinzhong Development Zone. Through calculating based on the ratio of benchmark land prices (released in 2017) of commercial land (grade 3) to residential land (grade 2) (1.18:1) of the region, and stripping and calculating of the land prices of the lands for commercial use and residential use based on the proportion of commercial and residential land in comparable 2, the land price for commercial use in comparable 2 is RMB4,029/m[2] .
The price of the comparable 3 used in the valuation is the transaction price of the commercial and residential land as published on the landchina.com (中國土地市場網). The total transaction price of the comprehensive commercial and residential land is RMB277.50 million, the total land area is 97,174.43m[2] , and the transaction unit rate through calculation is RMB2,856/m[2] . After stripping and calculating the comprehensive commercial and residential land, the land prices for commercial and residential uses can be revealed respectively. According to the land transfer
– 76 –
APPENDIX II
SUMMARY OF BUSINESS VALUATION REPORT
announcement of comparable 3, the land area of for commercial use is 97,17.44m[2] and the land area for residential use is 87,456.99m[2] . The site is located in commercial land grade five and residential land grade five of Jinzhong Development Zone. Through calculating based on the ratio of benchmark land prices (released in 2017) of commercial land (grade five) to residential land (grade five) (1.29:1) of the region, and stripping and calculating of the land prices of the lands for commercial use and residential use based on the proportion of commercial and residential land in comparable 3, the land price for commercial use in comparable 3 is RMB3,580/m[2] .
The land prices for each comparable after adjustments are as follows:
| Project name Land parcel subject to valuation Comparable 1 Comparable 2 Comparable 3 Land unit rate (RMB/m2) — 3,591 4,029 3,580 |
|
|---|---|
Based on the conditions of land parcels of the valuation object, the major factors affecting the price of valuation object include:
-
(1) Correction of transaction conditions: Whether it is a normal, open, fair and voluntary transaction, by correcting and exclusion of the price deviation of comparable caused by the special factors in the transaction behaviour.
-
(2) Correction of valuation date: adjust the price of the comparable on the transaction date to the price on the valuation date, and correct mainly using the land price index.
-
(3) Correction of land use life: correct the different service lives of comparables to the service life of the valuation object, to eliminate the impact of different land service lives on prices.
-
(4) Correction of regional factors: mainly including the distance from the business service center, the distance from the market, the road accessibility, the type of frontage road, and the convenience of public transportation, etc.
-
(5) Individual factors: mainly including land use, lot area, plot ratio, lot shape, topography, road conditions, land carrying capacity, land use restrictions, land development degree.
– 77 –
SUMMARY OF BUSINESS VALUATION REPORT
APPENDIX II
TABLE OF COMPARATIVE FACTORS
| Name | ||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Comparative Factors | Land parcel 1 Land parcel 2 Land parcel 3 Comparable 1 |
Comparable 2 | Comparable 3 | |||||||||||||||
| South of | South of South of |
|||||||||||||||||
| Huazhang Street, Huazhang Street, Huazhang Street, West |
of former | |||||||||||||||||
| East | of Guihua East |
of Guihua East |
of Guihua Yutai |
Road, | North of Anning | West of Jingxi | ||||||||||||
| Project location | East | 2nd Road, East |
2nd Road, East |
2nd Road, southeast of |
West Street, west | Avenue, north of | ||||||||||||
| Jinzhong | Jinzhong Jinzhong |
former Yuci | of Yuanqu Road | Chuangye Street | ||||||||||||||
| Development Development Development |
Fertilizer Plant | |||||||||||||||||
| Zone | Zone Zone |
|||||||||||||||||
| Transaction date | 2023/9/30 | 2023/9/30 2023/3/31 |
2023/4/20 | 2022/4/21 | 2021/5/14 | |||||||||||||
| Prices after adjustment of use and plot ratio (RMB/m 2) |
To be estimated To be estimated To be estimated 3,591 |
4,029 | 3,580 | |||||||||||||||
| Normal | Normal Normal |
Normal | Normal | Normal | ||||||||||||||
| Transaction condition | ||||||||||||||||||
| transaction | transaction transaction |
transaction | transaction | transaction | ||||||||||||||
| Land use | Commercial | Commercial Residential |
Residential | Residential | Residential | |||||||||||||
| Land service life | 32.63 years | 32.63 years 34. 41 years |
40 years | 40 years | 40 years |
– 78 –
APPENDIX II
SUMMARY OF BUSINESS VALUATION REPORT
| Name | ||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Comparative Factors | Land parcel 1 | Land parcel 2 | Land parcel 3 | Comparable 1 | Comparable 2 | Comparable 3 | ||||||||||||
| Distance to | ||||||||||||||||||
| business service | Relatively far | Relatively far | Relatively far | Relatively close | Relatively | far | Relatively | far | ||||||||||
| center | ||||||||||||||||||
| Distance to | ||||||||||||||||||
| market | Relatively far | Relatively far | Relatively far | Close | Relatively | close | General | |||||||||||
| Type of frontage | Transportation | Branch road | Traffic trunk road | Mixed-use trunk | Mixed-use trunk | Traffic trunk road | ||||||||||||
| road | trunk road | road | road | |||||||||||||||
| Distance to bus | ||||||||||||||||||
| station | Relatively far | Relatively far | Relatively far | Close | Relatively | close | Close | |||||||||||
| Distance to | ||||||||||||||||||
| railway station | General | General | General | General | General | General | ||||||||||||
| (including high | ||||||||||||||||||
| Regional Factors | speed railway) | |||||||||||||||||
| Distance to coach | ||||||||||||||||||
| station | Close | Close | Close | Far | Relatively | close | General | |||||||||||
| Distance to | ||||||||||||||||||
| airport | Relatively close | Relatively close | Relatively close | Far | General | Relatively | far | |||||||||||
| “Seven supplies” | “Seven supplies” | “Seven supplies” | “Seven supplies” | “Seven supplies” | “Seven supplies” | |||||||||||||
| Completeness of | outside | the red | outside the red | outside the red | outside the red | outside the red | outside the red | |||||||||||
| infrastructures | line of land | line of land | line of land | line of land | line of land | line of land | ||||||||||||
| parcel | parcel | parcel | parcel | parcel | parcel | |||||||||||||
| Completeness of | Relatively | Relatively | Relatively | General | General | Relatively | ||||||||||||
| public facilities | incomplete | incomplete | incomplete | incomplete | ||||||||||||||
| Environmental | ||||||||||||||||||
| conditions | Relatively good | Relatively good | Relatively good | Relatively good | Relatively | good | Relatively | good |
– 79 –
SUMMARY OF BUSINESS VALUATION REPORT
APPENDIX II
| Name | |||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Comparative Factors | Land parcel 1 | Land parcel 2 | Land parcel 3 | Comparable 1 | Comparable 2 | Comparable 3 | |||||||||||||||
| Degree | of | ||||||||||||||||||||
| development within the land |
Set site | leveling | Set site | leveling | Set | site leveling | Site leveling | Site leveling | Site leveling | ||||||||||||
| parcel | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Plot ratio | 2.10 | 2.10 | 2.0 | 2.5 | 1.8 | 2. 7 | |||||||||||||||
| Land parcel shape | Excellent | Relatively excellent |
General | Relatively excellent |
Relatively excellent |
Relatively excellent |
|||||||||||||||
| Land parcel area (m 2) |
5,131.18 | 11,278.65 | 5,086. 28 | 2,077. 54 | 6,502. 8 | 9,717. 44 | |||||||||||||||
| Individual factors | Frontage road | Roads on two | Roads on | two | Roads on four | Roads on two | Roads on two | Roads on two | |||||||||||||
| conditions | sides | sides | sides | sides | sides | sides | |||||||||||||||
| Topographic | Relatively | Relatively | Relatively | Relatively | Relatively | Relatively | |||||||||||||||
| conditions | excellent | excellent | excellent | excellent | excellent | excellent | |||||||||||||||
| Geological | Relatively | Relatively | Relatively | Relatively | Relatively | Relatively | |||||||||||||||
| conditions | excellent | excellent | excellent | excellent | excellent | excellent | |||||||||||||||
| Compliance with | Compliance with | Compliance with | Compliance with | Compliance with | Compliance with | ||||||||||||||||
| Planning | the planning | the planning | the | planning | the planning | the planning | the planning | ||||||||||||||
| constraints | without | special | without | special | without special | without special | without special | without special | |||||||||||||
| restrictions | restrictions | restrictions | restrictions | restrictions | restrictions |
2. Preparation of the table of comparative factor condition indicators
(I) Land parcel 1: Jin Kai Guo Yong (2016) No. 0207003
According to the specific conditions of various factors of the valuation object and comparables, the table of comparative factor condition indicators is prepared. The comparative factor indicators are determined as follows:
(1) Correction of valuation date
According to the changes in land prices in Jinzhong City in recent years, the prices of the same type of land were relatively stable in the period from the date of transaction to the date of valuation, so no correction is made to the valuation date in the valuation.
– 80 –
SUMMARY OF BUSINESS VALUATION REPORT
APPENDIX II
(2) Correction of transaction conditions
Considering the impact of transaction conditions on the land price, the transactions of the valuation object and the three comparables are normal market transactions, and the land prices are normal market prices, so it is not required to correct the transaction conditions.
(3) Correction of land service life
Correction coefficient formula of land service life: k=[1-1/(1+r)[m] ]/[1-1/(1+r)[n] ]
Wherein: K–Correction coefficient of service life
r — Land restoration rate
m — Service life of land subject to valuation
n — Service life of comparable lands
Determination of land restoration rate r: Generally, the method of safe interest rate plus risk adjustment value is adopted. Based on the interest rate for one-year bank time deposit recently announced by the People’s Bank of China and the local social and economic development and land investment risk situation, the land restoration rate r was determined to be 6%.
The land service life of the land subject to valuation (m) is 32.63 years and the land service life of the comparable land (n) is 40 years, so it is not required to correct the land service life.
Correction of land service life of valuation object: 1-1/(1+r)[m] =1-1/(1+6%)[32.63] ≈0.8506
Correction of land service life of comparables: 1-1/(1+r)[n] =1-1/(1+6%)[40] ≈0.9028
(4) Correction of regional factors
- ① Distance to commercial service center: The distance from the valuation object and comparables to the surrounding commercial center is divided into five grades: close, relatively close, general, relatively far and far. The valuation object is assigned with the score of 100, and 3 points are increased or decreased with the increase or decrease of one grade accordingly;
– 81 –
SUMMARY OF BUSINESS VALUATION REPORT
APPENDIX II
-
② Distance to market: The distance from the valuation object and comparables to market is divided into five grades: close, relatively close, general, relatively far and far. The valuation object is assigned with the score of 100, and 3 points are increased or decreased with the increase or decrease of one grade accordingly;
-
③ Grade of frontage road: The frontage roads of the valuation object and comparables are divided into five grades: mixed (transportation, living) trunk road, transportation trunk road, secondary trunk road, branch road and alley. The valuation object is assigned with the score of 100, and 1 point is increased or decreased with the increase or decrease of one grade accordingly;
-
④ Distance to bus station: The distance from the valuation object and comparables to bus station is divided into five grades: close, relatively close, general, relatively far and far. The valuation object is assigned with the score of 100, and 2 points are increased or decreased with the increase or decrease of one grade accordingly;
-
⑤ Distance to railway station (or high speed rail station): The distance from the valuation object and comparables to railway station (or high speed rail station) is divided into five grades: close, relatively close, general, relatively far and far. The valuation object is assigned with the score of 100, and 2 points are increased or decreased with the increase or decrease of one grade accordingly;
-
⑥ Distance to coach station: The distance from the valuation object and comparables to coach station is divided into five grades: close, relatively close, general, relatively far and far. The valuation object is assigned with the score of 100, and 1 point is increased or decreased with the increase or decrease of one grade accordingly;
-
⑦ Distance to airport: The distance from the valuation object and comparables to airport is divided into five grades: close, relatively close, general, relatively far and far. The valuation object is assigned with the score of 100, and 1 point is increased or decreased with the increase or decrease of one grade accordingly;
-
⑧ Completeness of infrastructures: The completeness and guarantee degree of the surrounding power supply, water supply, drainage, gas supply, communication and other infrastructure of the valuation object and comparables are divided into five grades: excellent, relatively excellent, general, relatively poor and poor. The valuation object is assigned with the score of 100, and 2 points are increased or decreased with the increase or decrease of one grade accordingly;
– 82 –
SUMMARY OF BUSINESS VALUATION REPORT
APPENDIX II
-
⑨ Completeness of public facilities: The completeness of surrounding public facilities including school, hospital, bank, etc. of the valuation object and comparables are divided into five grades: excellent, relatively excellent, general, relatively poor and poor. The valuation object is assigned with the score of 100, and 3 points are increased or decreased with the increase or decrease of one grade accordingly;
-
⑩ Environmental conditions: The environmental conditions of the area where the valuation object and comparables are located are divided into five grades: excellent, relatively excellent, general, relatively poor and poor. The valuation object is assigned with the score of 100, and 2 points are increased or decreased with the increase or decrease of one grade accordingly;
(6) Correction of individual factors
-
① Degree of development within the land parcel: Correction should be made based on the degree of influence of the development degree within the land parcel on the land price. As the development degrees within the land parcels of the valuation object and comparables are “site leveling”, no correction is required.
-
② Plot ratio: The correction of plot ratio should be conducted with reference to the table of correction coefficients for correction of plot ratios of residential land in the Technical Report on Land Grading and Benchmark Land Price Update of Jinzhong Economic and Technological Development Zone (reference date of 1 January 2018).Details are as follows:
| Valuation object Valuation object Comparable 1 Comparable 2 Comparable 3 Plot ratio 2.1 2.5 1.8 2.7 Plot ratio correction coefficient 0.961 1.000 0.928 1.018 |
|
|---|---|
-
③ Land parcel shape, depending on conditions, is divided into five grades: excellent (regular shape, reasonable land use), relatively excellent (regular shape, relatively reasonable land use), general (irregular shape, no adverse impact on land use), relatively poor (irregular shape, certain impact on land use), and poor (irregular shape, serious impact on land use). The valuation object is assigned with the score of 100, and 2 points are increased or decreased with the increase or decrease of one grade accordingly;
-
④ Land parcel area: The land area of the valuation object and comparables is moderate and conducive to development, and thus no correction is required;
– 83 –
SUMMARY OF BUSINESS VALUATION REPORT
APPENDIX II
-
⑤ Frontage road conditions: The conditions are divided into degrees: roads (trunk roads) on over two sides, roads (branch roads) on over two sides, roads on two sides, roads on one side and no frontage road. The valuation object is assigned with the score of 100, and 1 point is increased or decreased with the increase or decrease of one grade accordingly;
-
⑥ Topographic conditions: the flat degree of topography of the valuation object and comparables is divided into five grades: good, relatively good, general, relatively poor and poor. The valuation object is assigned with the score of 100, and 2 points are increased or decreased with the increase or decrease of one grade accordingly;
-
⑦ Geological conditions: mainly referring to the bearing capacity of foundation and groundwater. The bearing capacity of foundation is divided into five grades: excellent, relatively excellent, general, relatively poor and poor. The valuation object is assigned with the score of 100, and 2 points are increased or decreased with the increase or decrease of one grade accordingly;
-
⑧ Planning constraints: it is divided into two degrees: incompliance with the planning with special restrictions and compliance with the planning without special restrictions. The valuation object is assigned with the score of 100, and 2 points are increased or decreased with the increase or decrease of one grade accordingly.
Table of Scores of Comparative Factor Conditions
| Valuation object | Valuation object | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| and comparables | Valuation object | Comparable 1 | Comparable 2 | Comparable 3 | |||||||||
| Comparative factors | |||||||||||||
| Prices after adjustment of use (RMB/㎡) | — | 3,591 | 4,029 | 3,580 | |||||||||
| Transaction date | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | |||||||||
| Transaction condition | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | |||||||||
| Land use | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | |||||||||
| Land service life | 0.8506 | 0.9028 | 0.9028 | 0.9028 |
– 84 –
SUMMARY OF BUSINESS VALUATION REPORT
APPENDIX II
| Valuation object | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| and comparables | Valuation object | Comparable 1 | Comparable 2 | Comparable 3 | ||||||||||
| Comparative factors | ||||||||||||||
| Distance to business | ||||||||||||||
| 100 | 103 | 100 | 100 | |||||||||||
| service center | ||||||||||||||
| Distance to market | 100 | 109 | 106 | 103 | ||||||||||
| Type of frontage | 100 | 99 | 101 | 100 | ||||||||||
| road | ||||||||||||||
| Distance to bus | ||||||||||||||
| 100 | 104 | 104 | 106 | |||||||||||
| station | ||||||||||||||
| Distance to railway | ||||||||||||||
| station (including | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | ||||||||||
| Regional Factors | high speed railway) | |||||||||||||
| Distance to coach | ||||||||||||||
| 100 | 96 | 99 | 98 | |||||||||||
| station | ||||||||||||||
| Distance to airport | 100 | 97 | 99 | 98 | ||||||||||
| Completeness of | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | ||||||||||
| infrastructures | ||||||||||||||
| Completeness of | 100 | 103 | 103 | 100 | ||||||||||
| public facilities | ||||||||||||||
| Environmental | ||||||||||||||
| 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | |||||||||||
| conditions |
– 85 –
SUMMARY OF BUSINESS VALUATION REPORT
APPENDIX II
| Valuation object | Valuation object | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| and comparables Valuation object |
Comparable 1 | Comparable 2 | Comparable 3 | ||||||||||||
| Comparative factors | |||||||||||||||
| Degree of | |||||||||||||||
| development within | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | |||||||||||
| the land parcel | |||||||||||||||
| Plot ratio | 0.961 | 1.000 | 0.928 | 1.018 | |||||||||||
| Land parcel shape | 100 | 98 | 98 | 98 | |||||||||||
| Land parcel area | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | |||||||||||
| (㎡) | |||||||||||||||
| Individual factors | |||||||||||||||
| Frontage road | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | |||||||||||
| conditions | |||||||||||||||
| Topographic | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | |||||||||||
| conditions | |||||||||||||||
| Geological | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | |||||||||||
| conditions | |||||||||||||||
| Planning constraints | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 |
4. Preparation of the table of comparative factor correction coefficients
Table of Comparative Factor Correction Coefficients
| Valuation object | Valuation object | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| and comparables | Comparable 1 | Comparable 2 | Comparable 3 | ||||||||
| Comparative factors | |||||||||||
| Prices after adjustment of use (RMB/㎡) | 3,591 | 4,029 | 3,580 | ||||||||
| Transaction date | 100/100 | 100/100 | 100/100 | ||||||||
| Transaction condition | 100/100 | 100/100 | 100/100 | ||||||||
| Land use | 100/100 | 100/100 | 100/100 | ||||||||
| Land service life | 0.8506/0.9028 | 0.8506/0.9028 | 0.8506/0.9028 |
– 86 –
SUMMARY OF BUSINESS VALUATION REPORT
APPENDIX II
| Valuation object | Valuation object | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| and comparables | Comparable 1 | Comparable 2 | Comparable 3 | |||||||||||
| Comparative factors | ||||||||||||||
| Distance to business service center | 100/103 | 100/100 | 100/100 | |||||||||||
| Distance to market | 100/109 | 100/106 | 100/103 | |||||||||||
| Type of frontage road | 100/99 | 100/101 | 100/100 | |||||||||||
| Distance to bus station | 100/104 | 100/104 | 100/106 | |||||||||||
| Distance to railway station (including high | 100/100 | 100/100 | 100/100 | |||||||||||
| Regional factors | speed railway) | |||||||||||||
| Distance to coach station | 100/96 | 100/99 | 100/98 | |||||||||||
| Distance to airport | 100/97 | 100/99 | 100/98 | |||||||||||
| Completeness of infrastructures | 100/100 | 100/100 | 100/100 | |||||||||||
| Completeness of public facilities | 100/103 | 100/103 | 100/100 | |||||||||||
| Environmental conditions | 100/100 | 100/100 | 100/100 | |||||||||||
| Degree parcel |
of development within the land | 100/100 | 100/100 | 100/100 | ||||||||||
| Plot ratio | 0.961/1.000 | 0.961/0.928 | 0.961/1.018 | |||||||||||
| Land parcel shape | 100/98 | 100/98 | 100/98 | |||||||||||
| Individual factors | Land parcel area (㎡) | 100/100 | 100/100 | 100/100 | ||||||||||
| Frontage road conditions | 100/100 | 100/100 | 100/100 | |||||||||||
| Topographic conditions | 100/100 | 100/100 | 100/100 | |||||||||||
| Geological conditions | 100/100 | 100/100 | 100/100 | |||||||||||
| Planning constraints | 100/100 | 100/100 | 100/100 | |||||||||||
| Comprehensive correction coefficient | 0.833 | 0.886 | 0.866 | |||||||||||
| Benchmark price (RMB/㎡) | 2,991 | 3,570 | 3,100 | |||||||||||
| Appraised price of valuation object (RMB/㎡) | 3,220 |
– 87 –
SUMMARY OF BUSINESS VALUATION REPORT
APPENDIX II
(II) Land parcel 2: Jin Kai Guo Yong (2016) No. 0207004
According to the specific conditions of various factors of the valuation object and comparables, the table of comparative factor condition indicators is prepared. The comparative factor indicators are determined as follows:
(1) Correction of valuation date
According to the changes in land prices in Jinzhong City in recent years, the prices of the same type of land were relatively stable in the period from the date of transaction to the date of valuation, so no correction is made to the valuation date in the valuation.
(2) Correction of transaction conditions
Considering the impact of transaction conditions on the land price, the transactions of the valuation object and the three comparables are normal market transactions, and the land prices are normal market prices, so it is not required to correct the transaction conditions.
(3) Correction of land service life
Correction coefficient formula of land service life: k=[1-1/(1+r)[m] ]/[1-1/(1+r)[n] ]
Wherein: K–Correction coefficient of service life
r — Land restoration rate
m — Service life of land subject to valuation
n — Service life of comparable lands
Determination of land restoration rate r: Generally, the method of safe interest rate plus risk adjustment value is adopted. Based on the interest rate for one-year bank time deposit recently announced by the People’s Bank of China and the local social and economic development and land investment risk situation, the land restoration rate r was determined to be 6%.
The land service life of the land subject to valuation (m) is 32.63 years and the land service life of the comparable land (n) is 40 years, so it is not required to correct the land service life.
Correction of land service life of valuation object: 1-1/(1+r)[m] =1-1/(1+6%)[32.63] ≈0.8506
– 88 –
SUMMARY OF BUSINESS VALUATION REPORT
APPENDIX II
Correction of land service life of comparables: 1-1/(1+r)[n] =1-1/(1+6%)[40] ≈0.9028
(4) Correction of regional factors
-
① Distance to commercial service center: The distance from the valuation object and comparables to the surrounding commercial center is divided into five grades: close, relatively close, general, relatively far and far. The valuation object is assigned with the score of 100, and 3 points are increased or decreased with the increase or decrease of one grade accordingly;
-
② Distance to market: The distance from the valuation object and comparables to market is divided into five grades: close, relatively close, general, relatively far and far. The valuation object is assigned with the score of 100, and 3 points are increased or decreased with the increase or decrease of one grade accordingly;
-
③ Grade of frontage road: The frontage roads of the valuation object and comparables are divided into five grades: mixed (transportation, living) trunk road, transportation trunk road, secondary trunk road, branch road and alley. The valuation object is assigned with the score of 100, and 1 point is increased or decreased with the increase or decrease of one grade accordingly;
-
④ Distance to bus station: The distance from the valuation object and comparables to bus station is divided into five grades: close, relatively close, general, relatively far and far. The valuation object is assigned with the score of 100, and 2 points are increased or decreased with the increase or decrease of one grade accordingly;
-
⑤ Distance to railway station (or high speed rail station): The distance from the valuation object and comparables to railway station (or high speed rail station) is divided into five grades: close, relatively close, general, relatively far and far. The valuation object is assigned with the score of 100, and 2 points are increased or decreased with the increase or decrease of one grade accordingly;
-
⑥ Distance to coach station: The distance from the valuation object and comparables to coach station is divided into five grades: close, relatively close, general, relatively far and far. The valuation object is assigned with the score of 100, and 1 point is increased or decreased with the increase or decrease of one grade accordingly;
– 89 –
APPENDIX II
SUMMARY OF BUSINESS VALUATION REPORT
-
⑦ Distance to airport: The distance from the valuation object and comparables to airport is divided into five grades: close, relatively close, general, relatively far and far. The valuation object is assigned with the score of 100, and 1 point is increased or decreased with the increase or decrease of one grade accordingly;
-
⑧ Completeness of infrastructures: The completeness and guarantee degree of the surrounding power supply, water supply, drainage, gas supply, communication and other infrastructure of the valuation object and comparables are divided into five grades: excellent, relatively excellent, general, relatively poor and poor. The valuation object is assigned with the score of 100, and 2 points are increased or decreased with the increase or decrease of one grade accordingly;
-
⑨ Completeness of public facilities: The completeness of surrounding public facilities including school, hospital, bank, etc. of the valuation object and comparables are divided into five grades: excellent, relatively excellent, general, relatively poor and poor. The valuation object is assigned with the score of 100, and 3 points are increased or decreased with the increase or decrease of one grade accordingly;
-
⑩ Environmental conditions: The environmental conditions of the area where the valuation object and comparables are located are divided into five grades: excellent, relatively excellent, general, relatively poor and poor. The valuation object is assigned with the score of 100, and 2 points are increased or decreased with the increase or decrease of one grade accordingly;
(6) Correction of individual factors
- ① Degree of development within the land parcel: Correction should be made based on the degree of influence of the development degree within the land parcel on the land price. As the development degrees within the land parcels of the valuation object and comparables are “site leveling”, no correction is required.
– 90 –
SUMMARY OF BUSINESS VALUATION REPORT
APPENDIX II
- ② Plot ratio: The correction of plot ratio should be conducted with reference to the table of correction coefficients for correction of plot ratios of residential land in the Technical Report on Land Grading and Benchmark Land Price Update of Jinzhong Economic and Technological Development Zone (reference date of 1 January 2018). Details are as follows:
| Valuation object Valuation object Comparable 1 Comparable 2 Comparable 3 Plot ratio 2.1 2.5 1.8 2.7 Plot ratio correction coefficient 0.961 1.000 0.928 1.018 |
|
|---|---|
-
③ Land parcel shape, depending on conditions, is divided into five grades: excellent (regular shape, reasonable land use), relatively excellent (regular shape, relatively reasonable land use), general (irregular shape, no adverse impact on land use), relatively poor (irregular shape, certain impact on land use), and poor (irregular shape, serious impact on land use). The valuation object is assigned with the score of 100, and 2 points are increased or decreased with the increase or decrease of one grade accordingly;
-
④ Land parcel area: The land area of the valuation object and comparables is moderate and conducive to development, and thus no correction is required;
-
⑤ Frontage road conditions: The conditions are divided into degrees: roads (trunk roads) on over two sides, roads (branch roads) on over two sides, roads on two sides, roads on one side and no frontage road. The valuation object is assigned with the score of 100, and 1 point is increased or decreased with the increase or decrease of one grade accordingly;
-
⑥ Topographic conditions: the flat degree of topography of the valuation object and comparables is divided into five grades: good, relatively good, general, relatively poor and poor. The valuation object is assigned with the score of 100, and 2 points are increased or decreased with the increase or decrease of one grade accordingly;
-
⑦ Geological conditions: mainly referring to the bearing capacity of foundation and groundwater. The bearing capacity of foundation is divided into five grades: excellent, relatively excellent, general, relatively poor and poor. The valuation object is assigned with the score of 100, and 2 points are increased or decreased with the increase or decrease of one grade accordingly;
– 91 –
SUMMARY OF BUSINESS VALUATION REPORT
APPENDIX II
- ⑧ Planning constraints: it is divided into two degrees: incompliance with the planning with special restrictions and compliance with the planning without special restrictions. The valuation object is assigned with the score of 100, and 2 points are increased or decreased with the increase or decrease of one grade accordingly.
Table of Scores of Comparative Factor Conditions
| Valuation object | Valuation object | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| and comparables | Valuation object | Comparable 1 | Comparable 2 | Comparable 3 | ||||||||||
| Comparative factors | ||||||||||||||
| Prices after adjustment | of use (RMB/㎡) | — | 3,591 | 4,029 | 3,580 | |||||||||
| Transaction date | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | ||||||||||
| Transaction condition | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | ||||||||||
| Land use | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | ||||||||||
| Land service | life | 0.8506 | 0.9028 | 0.9028 | 0.9028 | |||||||||
| Distance to business | ||||||||||||||
| service center | 100 | 103 | 100 | 100 | ||||||||||
| Distance to market | 100 | 109 | 106 | 103 | ||||||||||
| Type of frontage road |
100 | 101 | 103 | 102 | ||||||||||
| Distance to bus station |
100 | 104 | 104 | 106 | ||||||||||
| Distance to railway | ||||||||||||||
| station (including | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | ||||||||||
| Regional factors | high speed railway) | |||||||||||||
| Distance to coach station |
100 | 96 | 99 | 98 | ||||||||||
| Distance to airport | 100 | 97 | 99 | 98 | ||||||||||
| Completeness of infrastructures |
100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | ||||||||||
| Completeness of public facilities |
100 | 103 | 103 | 100 | ||||||||||
| Environmental | ||||||||||||||
| conditions | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 |
– 92 –
SUMMARY OF BUSINESS VALUATION REPORT
APPENDIX II
| Valuation object | Valuation object | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| and comparables | Valuation object | Comparable 1 | Comparable 2 | Comparable 3 | |||||||||
| Comparative factors | |||||||||||||
| Degree of | |||||||||||||
| development within | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | |||||||||
| the land parcel | |||||||||||||
| Plot ratio | 0.961 | 1.000 | 0.928 | 1.018 | |||||||||
| Land parcel shape | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | |||||||||
| Land parcel area (㎡) |
100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | |||||||||
| Individual factors | |||||||||||||
| Frontage road conditions |
100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | |||||||||
| Topographic conditions |
100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | |||||||||
| Geological conditions |
100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | |||||||||
| Planning constraints | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 |
4. Preparation of the table of comparative factor correction coefficients
Table of Comparative Factor Correction Coefficients
| Valuation object | Valuation object | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| and comparables | Comparable 1 | Comparable 2 | Comparable 3 | ||||||||
| Comparative factors | |||||||||||
| Prices after adjustment of use (RMB/㎡) | 3,591 | 4,029 | 3,580 | ||||||||
| Transaction date | 100/100 | 100/100 | 100/100 | ||||||||
| Transaction condition | 100/100 | 100/100 | 100/100 | ||||||||
| Land use | 100/100 | 100/100 | 100/100 | ||||||||
| Land service life | 0.8506/0.9028 | 0.8506/0.9028 | 0.8506/0.9028 |
– 93 –
SUMMARY OF BUSINESS VALUATION REPORT
APPENDIX II
| Valuation object | Valuation object | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| and comparables | Comparable 1 | Comparable 2 | Comparable 3 | |||||||||||
| Comparative factors | ||||||||||||||
| Distance to business service center | 100/103 | 100/100 | 100/100 | |||||||||||
| Distance to market | 100/109 | 100/106 | 100/103 | |||||||||||
| Type of frontage road | 100/101 | 100/103 | 100/102 | |||||||||||
| Distance to bus station | 100/104 | 100/104 | 100/106 | |||||||||||
| Distance to railway station | (including high | 100/100 | 100/100 | 100/100 | ||||||||||
| Regional factors | speed | railway) | ||||||||||||
| Distance to coach station | 100/96 | 100/99 | 100/98 | |||||||||||
| Distance to airport | 100/97 | 100/99 | 100/98 | |||||||||||
| Completeness of infrastructures | 100/100 | 100/100 | 100/100 | |||||||||||
| Completeness of public facilities | 100/103 | 100/103 | 100/100 | |||||||||||
| Environmental conditions | 100/100 | 100/100 | 100/100 | |||||||||||
| Degree of development within the land | 100/100 | 100/100 | 100/100 | |||||||||||
| parcel | ||||||||||||||
| Plot ratio | 0.961/1.000 | 0.961/0.928 | 0.961/1.018 | |||||||||||
| Land parcel shape | 100/100 | 100/100 | 100/100 | |||||||||||
| Individual factors | Land parcel area (㎡) | 100/100 | 100/100 | 100/100 | ||||||||||
| Frontage road conditions | 100/100 | 100/100 | 100/100 | |||||||||||
| Topographic conditions | 100/100 | 100/100 | 100/100 | |||||||||||
| Geological conditions | 100/100 | 100/100 | 100/100 | |||||||||||
| Planning constraints | 100/100 | 100/100 | 100/100 | |||||||||||
| Comprehensive correction coefficient | 0.800 | 0.851 | 0.832 | |||||||||||
| Benchmark price (RMB/㎡) | 2,873 | 3,429 | 2,979 | |||||||||||
| Appraised price of valuation object (RMB/㎡) | 3,094 |
– 94 –
SUMMARY OF BUSINESS VALUATION REPORT
APPENDIX II
(III) Land parcel 3: Jin (2018) Jin Zhong Shi Bu Dong Chan Quan No. 0006414
According to the specific conditions of various factors of the valuation object and comparables, the table of comparative factor condition indicators is prepared. The comparative factor indicators are determined as follows:
(1) Correction of valuation date
According to the changes in land prices in Jinzhong City in recent years, the prices of the same type of land were relatively stable in the period from the date of transaction to the date of valuation, so no correction is made to the valuation date in the valuation.
(2) Correction of transaction conditions
Considering the impact of transaction conditions on the land price, the transactions of the valuation object and the three comparables are normal market transactions, and the land prices are normal market prices, so it is not required to correct the transaction conditions.
(3) Correction of land service life
Correction coefficient formula of land service life: k=[1-1 ╱ (1+r)[m] ] ╱ [1-1 ╱ (1+r)[n] ]
Wherein: K — Correction coefficient of service life
r — Land restoration rate
m — Service life of land subject to valuation
n — Service life of comparable lands
Determination of land restoration rate r: Generally, the method of safe interest rate plus risk adjustment value is adopted. Based on the interest rate for one-year bank time deposit recently announced by the People’s Bank of China and the local social and economic development and land investment risk situation, the land restoration rate r was determined to be 6%.
The land service life of the land subject to valuation (m) is 34.41 years and the land service life of the comparable land (n) is 40 years, so it is not required to correct the land service life.
Correction of land service life of valuation object: 1-1 ╱ (1+r)[m] =1-1 ╱ (1+6%)[34.41] ≈ 0.8653
Correction of land service life of comparables: 1-1 ╱ (1+r)[n] =1-1 ╱ (1+6%)[40] ≈ 0.9028
– 95 –
SUMMARY OF BUSINESS VALUATION REPORT
APPENDIX II
-
(4) Correction of regional factors
-
Distance to commercial service center: The distance from the valuation object and comparables to the surrounding commercial center is divided into five grades: close, relatively close, general, relatively far and far. The valuation object is assigned with the score of 100, and 3 points are increased or decreased with the increase or decrease of one grade accordingly;
-
Distance to market: The distance from the valuation object and comparables to market is divided into five grades: close, relatively close, general, relatively far and far. The valuation object is assigned with the score of 100, and 3 points are increased or decreased with the increase or decrease of one grade accordingly;
-
Grade of frontage road: The frontage roads of the valuation object and comparables are divided into five grades: mixed (transportation, living) trunk road, transportation trunk road, secondary trunk road, branch road and alley. The valuation object is assigned with the score of 100, and 1 point is increased or decreased with the increase or decrease of one grade accordingly;
-
Distance to bus station: The distance from the valuation object and comparables to bus station is divided into five grades: close, relatively close, general, relatively far and far. The valuation object is assigned with the score of 100, and 2 points are increased or decreased with the increase or decrease of one grade accordingly;
-
Distance to railway station (or high speed rail station): The distance from the valuation object and comparables to railway station (or high speed rail station) is divided into five grades: close, relatively close, general, relatively far and far. The valuation object is assigned with the score of 100, and 2 points are increased or decreased with the increase or decrease of one grade accordingly;
-
Distance to coach station: The distance from the valuation object and comparables to coach station is divided into five grades: close, relatively close, general, relatively far and far. The valuation object is assigned with the score of 100, and 1 point is increased or decreased with the increase or decrease of one grade accordingly;
-
Distance to airport: The distance from the valuation object and comparables to airport is divided into five grades: close, relatively close, general, relatively far and far. The valuation object is assigned with the score of 100, and 1 point is increased or decreased with the increase or decrease of one grade accordingly;
– 96 –
SUMMARY OF BUSINESS VALUATION REPORT
APPENDIX II
-
Completeness of infrastructures: The completeness and guarantee degree of the surrounding power supply, water supply, drainage, gas supply, communication and other infrastructure of the valuation object and comparables are divided into five grades: excellent, relatively excellent, general, relatively poor and poor. The valuation object is assigned with the score of 100, and 2 points are increased or decreased with the increase or decrease of one grade accordingly;
-
Completeness of public facilities: The completeness of surrounding public facilities including school, hospital, bank, etc. of the valuation object and comparables are divided into five grades: excellent, relatively excellent, general, relatively poor and poor. The valuation object is assigned with the score of 100, and 3 points are increased or decreased with the increase or decrease of one grade accordingly;
-
Environmental conditions: The environmental conditions of the area where the valuation object and comparables are located are divided into five grades: excellent, relatively excellent, general, relatively poor and poor. The valuation object is assigned with the score of 100, and 2 points are increased or decreased with the increase or decrease of one grade accordingly;
(5) Correction of individual factors
-
Degree of development within the land parcel: Correction should be made based on the degree of influence of the development degree within the land parcel on the land price. As the development degrees within the land parcels of the valuation object and comparables are “site leveling”, no correction is required.
-
Plot ratio: The correction of plot ratio should be conducted with reference to the table of correction coefficients for correction of plot ratios of residential land in the Technical Report on Land Grading and Benchmark Land Price Update of Jinzhong Economic and Technological Development Zone (reference date of 1 January 2018).
Details are as follows:
| Valuation object Valuation object Comparable 1 Comparable 2 Comparable 3 Plot ratio 2.0 2.5 1.8 2.7 Plot ratio correction coefficient 0.961 1.000 0.928 1.018 |
|
|---|---|
– 97 –
SUMMARY OF BUSINESS VALUATION REPORT
APPENDIX II
-
Land parcel shape, depending on conditions, is divided into five grades: excellent (regular shape, reasonable land use), relatively excellent (regular shape, relatively reasonable land use), general (irregular shape, no adverse impact on land use), relatively poor (irregular shape, certain impact on land use), and poor (irregular shape, serious impact on land use). The valuation object is assigned with the score of 100, and 2 points are increased or decreased with the increase or decrease of one grade accordingly;
-
Land parcel area: The land area of the valuation object and comparables is moderate and conducive to development, and thus no correction is required;
-
Frontage road conditions: the conditions are divided into degrees: roads (trunk roads) on over two sides, roads (branch roads) on over two sides, roads on two sides, roads on one side and no frontage road. The valuation object is assigned with the score of 100, and 1 point is increased or decreased with the increase or decrease of one grade accordingly;
-
Topographic conditions: the flat degree of topography of the valuation object and comparables is divided into five grades: good, relatively good, general, relatively poor and poor. The valuation object is assigned with the score of 100, and 2 points are increased or decreased with the increase or decrease of one grade accordingly;
-
Geological conditions: mainly referring to the bearing capacity of foundation and groundwater. The bearing capacity of foundation is divided into five grades: excellent, relatively excellent, general, relatively poor and poor. The valuation object is assigned with the score of 100, and 2 points are increased or decreased with the increase or decrease of one grade accordingly;
-
Planning constraints: it is divided into two degrees: incompliance with the planning with special restrictions and compliance with the planning without special restrictions. The valuation object is assigned with the score of 100, and 2 points are increased or decreased with the increase or decrease of one grade accordingly.
TABLE OF SCORES OF COMPARATIVE FACTOR CONDITIONS
| Valuation object and comparables Comparative factors Valuation object Comparable 1 Comparable 2 Comparable 3 |
|
|---|---|
– 98 –
SUMMARY OF BUSINESS VALUATION REPORT
APPENDIX II
| Valuation object | Valuation object | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| and comparables | Valuation object | Comparable 1 | Comparable 2 | Comparable 3 | |||||||||||
| Comparative factors | |||||||||||||||
| Transaction date | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | |||||||||||
| Transaction condition | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | |||||||||||
| Land use | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | |||||||||||
| Land service life | 0.8653 | 0.9028 | 0.9028 | 0.9028 | |||||||||||
| Distance to business | |||||||||||||||
| 100 | 103 | 100 | 100 | ||||||||||||
| service center | |||||||||||||||
| Distance to market | 100 | 109 | 106 | 103 | |||||||||||
| Type of frontage | 100 | 99 | 101 | 100 | |||||||||||
| road | |||||||||||||||
| Distance to bus | |||||||||||||||
| 100 | 104 | 104 | 106 | ||||||||||||
| station | |||||||||||||||
| Distance to railway | |||||||||||||||
| station (including | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | |||||||||||
| Regional factors | high speed | railway) | |||||||||||||
| Distance to coach | |||||||||||||||
| 100 | 96 | 99 | 98 | ||||||||||||
| station | |||||||||||||||
| Distance to airport | 100 | 97 | 99 | 98 | |||||||||||
| Completeness of | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | |||||||||||
| infrastructures | |||||||||||||||
| Completeness of | 100 | 103 | 103 | 100 | |||||||||||
| public facilities | |||||||||||||||
| Environmental | |||||||||||||||
| 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | ||||||||||||
| conditions |
– 99 –
SUMMARY OF BUSINESS VALUATION REPORT
APPENDIX II
| Valuation object | Valuation object | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| and comparables Valuation object |
Comparable 1 | Comparable 2 | Comparable 3 | ||||||||||||
| Comparative factors | |||||||||||||||
| Degree of | |||||||||||||||
| development within | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | |||||||||||
| the land parcel | |||||||||||||||
| Plot ratio | 0. 950 | 1.000 | 0. 928 | 1.018 | |||||||||||
| Land parcel shape | 100 | 102 | 102 | 102 | |||||||||||
| Land parcel area (m2) |
100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | |||||||||||
| Individual factors | |||||||||||||||
| Frontage road | 100 | 98 | 98 | 98 | |||||||||||
| conditions | |||||||||||||||
| Topographic | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | |||||||||||
| conditions | |||||||||||||||
| Geological | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | |||||||||||
| conditions | |||||||||||||||
| Planning constraints | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 |
3. Preparation of the table of comparative factor correction coefficients
Table of Comparative Factor Correction Coefficients
| Valuation object | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| and comparables | Comparable 1 | Comparable 2 | Comparable 3 | |||||||
| Comparative factors | ||||||||||
| Prices after adjustment of use and plot ratio (RMB/m2) |
3,591 | 4,029 | 3,580 | |||||||
| Transaction date | 100/100 | 100/100 | 100/100 | |||||||
| Transaction condition | 100/100 | 100/100 | 100/100 | |||||||
| Land use | 100/100 | 100/100 | 100/100 | |||||||
| Land service life | 0.8653/0.9028 | 0.8653/0.9028 | 0.8653/0.9028 |
– 100 –
SUMMARY OF BUSINESS VALUATION REPORT
APPENDIX II
| Valuation object | Valuation object | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| and comparables | Comparable 1 | Comparable 2 | Comparable 3 | |||||||||||
| Comparative factors | ||||||||||||||
| Distance to business service center | 100/103 | 100/100 | 100/100 | |||||||||||
| Distance to market | 100/109 | 100/106 | 100/103 | |||||||||||
| Type of frontage road | 100/99 | 100/101 | 100/100 | |||||||||||
| Distance to bus station | 100/104 | 100/104 | 100/106 | |||||||||||
| Distance to railway station | (including high | 100/100 | 100/100 | 100/100 | ||||||||||
| Regional factors | speed | railway) | ||||||||||||
| Distance to coach station | 100/96 | 100/99 | 100/98 | |||||||||||
| Distance to airport | 100/97 | 100/99 | 100/98 | |||||||||||
| Completeness of infrastructures | 100/100 | 100/100 | 100/100 | |||||||||||
| Completeness of public facilities | 100/103 | 100/103 | 100/100 | |||||||||||
| Environmental conditions | 100/100 | 100/100 | 100/100 | |||||||||||
| Degree of development within the land | 100/100 | 100/100 | 100/100 | |||||||||||
| parcel | ||||||||||||||
| Plot ratio | 0.950/1.000 | 0.950/0.928 | 0.950/1.018 | |||||||||||
| Land parcel shape | 100/102 | 100/102 | 100/102 | |||||||||||
| Individual factors | Land parcel area (m2) | 100/100 | 100/100 | 100/100 | ||||||||||
| Frontage road conditions | 100/98 | 100/98 | 100/98 | |||||||||||
| Topographic conditions | 100/100 | 100/100 | 100/100 | |||||||||||
| Geological conditions | 100/100 | 100/100 | 100/100 | |||||||||||
| Planning constraints | 100/100 | 100/100 | 100/100 | |||||||||||
| Comprehensive correction coefficient | 0.822 | 0.873 | 0.853 | |||||||||||
| Benchmark price (RMB/m2) | 2,952 | 3,517 | 3,054 | |||||||||||
| Appraised price of valuation object (RMB/m2) | 3,174 |
– 101 –
SUMMARY OF BUSINESS VALUATION REPORT
APPENDIX II
(D) Calculation of the commercial land price of the valuation object using residue approach
Residue approach: also known as retrograde approach, residual approach or residual value approach, it is an approach to determine the land price of the valuation object with the price balance on the basis of estimating the normal transaction price of the real estate after the completion of development, after deducting the construction cost of the normal development of the building and professional fees, interest, profit, tax and other expenses related to the construction and sale of the building. According to the planning conditions, the value and development cost of the valuation object after the completion of the future development are relatively easy to estimate, which has the prerequisite of using the residue approach. Therefore, it is advisable to use the residue approach for calculation, and the calculation formula is as follows:
V=A-B-C
Wherein:
-
V — price of the lance parcel subject to valuation
-
A — total price of the real estate
-
B — overall development cost of the development project
-
C — Objective development profit
(I) Land parcel 1: Jin Kai Guo Yong (2016) No. 02070003
1. Assumptions for the valuation
The valuation assumes that the valuation object can successfully complete the expected development and construction goals, and the project construction cycle is 3.0 years; the construction and installation costs are invested evenly during the project cycle, and the interest is calculated based on compound interest. Although the payment of the total price of real estates and various costs occurs in the future, all data of the total price of real estates and the costs used in the residue approach valuation are future data determined based on their current level. It is assumed that the key variables involved in the residue approach valuation will not change significantly during the development period, and the project are leased or sold out in full after completion.
– 102 –
SUMMARY OF BUSINESS VALUATION REPORT
APPENDIX II
2. Determination of the best method to develop and utilize land
In the valuation, the best development and utilization method is determined according to the planning conditions of the land parcel subject to valuation. Ordinary residential buildings are constructed with supporting commercial real estates, equipped with water supply, sewage, electricity, heating, telecommunication and other infrastructure. It is assumed that the commercial buildings will be mainly rented out for operation after completion, the standard of whose delivery is the same can be directly used after decoration.
The total area of the land parcel subject to valuation is 5,131.18 m[2] and the plot ratio is assumed to be 2.0 according to the planning conditions during the valuation, then:
Planned commercial buildings GFA=5,131.18×2.1≈10,775.48 (m[2] )
3. Calculation of the value of the valuation object after development is completed
Through the investigation of commercial real estate leasing and sales market in the area where the land parcel subject to valuation is located, the appraisers determined after calculation that the average market price of commercial real estates on the land parcel subject to valuation is RMB7,350/m[2] based on objective rental income, vacancy rate, return rate and other relevant data of similar commercial real estates in the area, and in combination with the actual conditions of the valuation object.
Value of the real estate after development completed = selling price ×GFA
Value of ordinary residential real estate=7,350×10,775.48≈7,919.98 (RMB’0,000)
4. Calculation of land acquisition tax
Land acquisition tax includes deed tax of 3% and stamp tax of 0.5‰, etc., totaling 0.0305V (V is the land parcel price of the valuation object).
5. Calculation of housing construction cost
The construction cost of the housings built by the valuation object is estimated based on the planning conditions, building structure, ancillary facilities and decoration and other design standards of the valuation object abovementioned.
– 103 –
SUMMARY OF BUSINESS VALUATION REPORT
APPENDIX II
Construction Cost Calculation Sheet
| Amount | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No. | Item | (RMB/m2) | Explanation | |||
| It includes the civil engineering cost, installation cost, | ||||||
| decoration cost and other costs incurred in |
the | |||||
| Construction | construction of buildings and ancillary works. The |
|||||
| construction and installation costs are determined to | be | |||||
| 1 | and installation costs |
2,800 | RMB2,800/m2 according to the relevant quota, with |
|||
| reference to the investment of similar buildings and in | ||||||
| combination with the local actual conditions during | the | |||||
| valuation. | ||||||
| It includes preliminary research fees (including market | ||||||
| research fee, feasibility study fee, project planning fee), | ||||||
| exploration and design cost (including project exploration | ||||||
| Exploration, | cost, environmental impact assessment fee, traffic impact | |||||
| design and | assessment fee, planning and design fee), construction | |||||
| 2 | preliminary | 140 | project bidding fee and the necessary expenses |
for | ||
| engineering | preliminary work such as “three supplies and |
one | ||||
| costs | leveling” at the construction site and temporary housing. | |||||
| Based on the scale, complexity and building structure of | ||||||
| projects of the valuation object, the valuation is calculated | ||||||
| at 5% of the construction and installation costs. | ||||||
| It refers to the construction cost for ancillary roads, water | ||||||
| supply, drainage, electricity, communications, gas, heating | ||||||
| and other facilities required by urban planning from | the | |||||
| Infrastructure | project land red line to the building base. Based on | the | ||||
| 3 | construction | 280 | construction and installation costs, it is generally |
|||
| cost | determined at a ratio of 5%-15%. Based on the scale, | |||||
| complexity and building structure of projects of | the | |||||
| valuation object, the valuation is calculated at 10% of | the | |||||
| construction and installation costs. |
– 104 –
SUMMARY OF BUSINESS VALUATION REPORT
APPENDIX II
Public facilities construction cost refers to the cost for municipal public facilities and green spaces in residential areas, mainly including education, medical and health, culture and sports, commercial services, administrative Public facilities 4 140 management and community services and green spaces. cost According to relevant national requirements and with reference to the local public facilities cost of similar buildings, it is generally calculated as 5% of the construction and installation costs. Including relevant taxes and fees charged by local governments or their relevant departments, such as greening construction cost, civil air defense project fee, urban temporary land fee, municipal and cultural pipeline Taxes and apportionment fee, initial telephone installation fee, unforeseen fees 5 140 decentralized construction of municipal public facilities during construction cost, construction waste disposal fee and development other expenses. They are generally determined at a ratio of 2%-5% based on the construction and installation costs and taking into account unforeseen fees. This item is calculated at 5% of the construction and installation costs. Unit price of housing construction cost = construction and Unit price of installation costs + exploration, design and preliminary 6 construction 3,500 engineering costs + infrastructure construction cost + cost public facilities construction cost + taxes and unforeseen fees during development.
Total construction cost=3,500×10,775.48≈3,771.42 (RMB’0,000)
6. Calculation of management expense
Management expense refers to the expenditure of real estate developers necessary for organizing and managing real estate development and operation activities, including staff wage and welfare fee, office expense and travel expense of real estate developers. Based on the construction cost of buildings, management expense is calculated at 3% of the construction cost during the valuation. The valuation assumes the residential land value as V.
= Management expense (3,771.42+1.0305V)×3%
- ≈113.14+ 3.1%V (RMB’0,000)
– 105 –
SUMMARY OF BUSINESS VALUATION REPORT
APPENDIX II
7. Calculation of sales expense
It refers to the expense necessary for pre-sale of the real estate that will be developed in the future or for sale of the real estate that has been developed, including advertising fee, sales materials production fee, model housing or model room construction cost, sales office construction cost, sales personnel expense or sales agent fee. Based on the value after development is completed, and in combination with the situation of this project, sales expense is calculated at 3.0% of the value after development is completed during the valuation, then:
Sales expense=7,919.98×3.0%≈237.60 (RMB’0,000)
8. Calculation of investment interest
The development cycle and interest rate of real estate are determined based on the actual conditions. Based on the total prepaid capital (including the desired land value, land acquisition tax, housing construction cost and management expense and sales expense), and the project construction cycle of 3.0 years, assuming that the land value V and land acquisition tax are invested in lump sum at the beginning of the construction cycle, housing construction cost and management expense and sales expense are invested evenly during the construction cycle, and the interest rate takes the 1-5 years loan interest rate of 4.75% implemented from 24 October 2015, as calculated based on compound interest, then:
Investment interest = (land price + land acquisition tax) ×[(1 + interest rate)[3] -1] + (housing construction cost + management expense + sales expense) ×[(1 + interest rate)[3/2] -1]
=V×(1+3.05%)×[(1+4.75%)[3] -1]+( 3,771.42+113.14+3.1%V+237.60)×[(1+4.75%)[3/2] -1]
≈297.16+0.1562V (RMB’0,000)
9. Calculation of sales tax
Sales tax refers to the tax paid by the seller for pre-sale or sale of the real estate after development is completed, including value-added tax, urban construction and maintenance tax, education surcharge and stamp duty. Through investigation and calculation, it was determined that the total cost of this item is about 5.4% of the value of the real estate after development is completed, and 5.4% is taken for the valuation.
Sales tax=7,919.98×5.4%≈427.68 (RMB’0,000)
– 106 –
SUMMARY OF BUSINESS VALUATION REPORT
APPENDIX II
10. Calculation of development profit
Profit refers to the average profit that real estate developers can obtain from real estate developments under normal conditions. The valuation takes sales profit to calculate its development profit. Based on the scale of buildings of the valuation object and other conditions, 15% is taken with reference to the average level of good sales profit margin of real estate developers published in the Enterprise Performance Valuation Standard Value in the past five years, and in combination with the average sales profit margin of the local residential real estate development industry, then:
Profit = total price after development completed × profit margin=7,919.98×15%≈1,188 (RMB’0,000)
11. Calculation of land price
Land price = value after development completed –(land acquisition tax + housing construction cost + management expense + sales expense + investment interest + sales tax) –profit, then:
V=7,919.98-(3.05%V+3,771.42+113.14+3.1%V+237.60+297.16+0.1562V +427.68)-1,188
≈1,547.98 (RMB’0,000) 18849800
Commercial land unit price = total land price ÷land area
=1547.98×10,000÷5,131.18
≈3,017 (RMB/m[2] )
– 107 –
SUMMARY OF BUSINESS VALUATION REPORT
APPENDIX II
12. Determination of valuation result of land price
(1) Method for determination of land price
According to the technical regulations for land price valuation and the specific conditions of the land subject to valuation, the valuation results are as follows:
| Land use Unit land price in valuation results (RMB/m2) Market comparison approach Residue approach Commercial 3,220 3,017 |
|
|---|---|
The appraisers are of the view that: the calculation principles of market comparison approach and cost approximation approach are different. Both approaches can reflect the land price of valuation object from different aspects, and there is little difference in the calculation results of the two approaches. Therefore, the simple arithmetic average of the two calculation results is used to determine the final price in the valuation (i.e. calculation weight of 50% for each), as detailed in the following table:
| Land use | Market comparison approach Residue approach Area of land parcel (m2) Calculation results (RMB/m2) Weight Calculation results (RMB/m2) Weight |
Unit land price Total land price (RMB’0,000) RMB/m2 RMB’0,000/ Mu 3,119 207.93 1,600.42 |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Commercial | 3,220 50% 3,017 50% 5,131.18 |
(2) Valuation results
After investigation and analysis of the land parcel of the valuation object and the area in which it is located, the appraisers calculated the market price of the land use right using a scientific valuation approach in accordance with the basic principles of land appraisal and relevant laws and regulations, based on the conditions of the valuation date, the set development degree, the set use, the set land use and current conditions, and the set term conditions:
– 108 –
SUMMARY OF BUSINESS VALUATION REPORT
APPENDIX II
| Real Estate Title Certificate No. Use Area of land parcel (m2) Unit land price (RMB/m2) Total price (RMB’0,000) Jin Kai Guo Yong (2016) No. 0207003 Commercial 5,131.18 (equivalent to 7.7 Mu) 3,119 (equivalent to RMB2,079,300/Mu) 1,600.42 |
|
|---|---|
(II) Land parcel 2: Jin Kai Guo Yong (2016) No. 0207005
1. Assumptions for the valuation
The valuation assumes that the valuation object can successfully complete the expected development and construction goals, and the project construction cycle is 3.0 years; the construction and installation costs are invested evenly during the project cycle, and the interest is calculated based on compound interest. Although the payment of the total price of real estates and various costs occurs in the future, all data of the total price of real estates and the costs used in the residue approach valuation are future data determined based on their current level. It is assumed that the key variables involved in the residue approach valuation will not change significantly during the development period, and the project are leased or sold out in full after completion.
2. Determination of the best method to develop and utilize land
In the valuation, the best development and utilization method is determined according to the planning conditions of the land parcel subject to valuation. Ordinary residential buildings are constructed with supporting commercial real estates, equipped with water supply, sewage, electricity, heating, telecommunication and other infrastructure. It is assumed that the commercial buildings will be mainly rented out for operation after completion, the standard of whose delivery is the same can be directly used after decoration.
The total area of the land parcel subject to valuation is 11,278.65 m[2] and the plot ratio is assumed to be 2.1 according to the planning conditions during the valuation, then: Planned commercial buildings GFA=11,278.65×2.1≈10,775.48(m[2] )
3. Calculation of the value of the valuation object after development is completed
Through the investigation of commercial real estate leasing and sales market in the area where the land parcel subject to valuation is located, the appraisers determined after calculation that the average market price of commercial real estates on the land parcel subject to valuation is
– 109 –
SUMMARY OF BUSINESS VALUATION REPORT
APPENDIX II
RMB7,350/m[2] based on objective rental income, vacancy rate, return rate and other relevant data of similar commercial real estates in the area, and in combination with the actual conditions of the valuation object.
Value of the real estate after development completed = selling price ×GFA
Value of ordinary residential real estate=7,350×10,775.48≈17,408.60 (RMB’0,000)
4. Calculation of land acquisition tax
Land acquisition tax includes deed tax of 3% and stamp tax of 0.5‰, etc., totaling 0.0305V (V is the land parcel price of the valuation object).
5. Calculation of housing construction cost
The construction cost of the housings built by the valuation object is estimated based on the planning conditions, building structure, ancillary facilities and decoration and other design standards of the valuation object abovementioned.
Construction Cost Calculation Sheet
| Amount | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No. | Item | (RMB/m2) | Explanation | ||||||||||
| It includes the civil engineering | cost, | installation | cost, | ||||||||||
| decoration | cost and other costs |
incurred in |
the | ||||||||||
| Construction | construction | of buildings and |
ancillary works. |
The | |||||||||
| construction | and installation costs | are | determined | to be | |||||||||
| 1 | and installation costs |
2,800 | RMB2,800/m2 according to the |
relevant quota, |
with | ||||||||
| reference to | the investment of similar | buildings and in | |||||||||||
| combination | with the local actual | conditions during the | |||||||||||
| valuation. |
– 110 –
SUMMARY OF BUSINESS VALUATION REPORT
APPENDIX II
It includes preliminary research fees (including market research fee, feasibility study fee, project planning fee), exploration and design cost (including project exploration Exploration, cost, environmental impact assessment fee, traffic impact design and assessment fee, planning and design fee), construction 2 preliminary 140 project bidding fee and the necessary expenses for engineering preliminary work such as “three supplies and one costs leveling” at the construction site and temporary housing. Based on the scale, complexity and building structure of projects of the valuation object, the valuation is calculated at 5% of the construction and installation costs. It refers to the construction cost for ancillary roads, water supply, drainage, electricity, communications, gas, heating and other facilities required by urban planning from the Infrastructure project land red line to the building base. Based on the 3 construction 280 construction and installation costs, it is generally cost determined at a ratio of 5%-15%. Based on the scale, complexity and building structure of projects of the valuation object, the valuation is calculated at 10% of the construction and installation costs. Public facilities construction cost refers to the cost for municipal public facilities and green spaces in residential areas, mainly including education, medical and health, culture and sports, commercial services, administrative Public facilities 4 140 management and community services and green spaces. cost According to relevant national requirements and with reference to the local public facilities cost of similar buildings, it is generally calculated as 5% of the construction and installation costs.
– 111 –
SUMMARY OF BUSINESS VALUATION REPORT
APPENDIX II
Including relevant taxes and fees charged by local governments or their relevant departments, such as greening construction cost, civil air defense project fee, urban temporary land fee, municipal and cultural pipeline Taxes and apportionment fee, initial telephone installation fee, unforeseen fees 5 140 decentralized construction of municipal public facilities during construction cost, construction waste disposal fee and development other expenses. They are generally determined at a ratio of 2%-5% based on the construction and installation costs and taking into account unforeseen fees. This item is calculated at 5% of the construction and installation costs. Unit price of housing construction cost = construction and Unit price of installation costs + exploration, design and preliminary 6 construction 3,500 engineering costs + infrastructure construction cost + cost public facilities construction cost + taxes and unforeseen fees during development.
Total construction cost=3,500×10,775.48≈8,289.81 (RMB’0,000)
6. Calculation of management expense
Management expense refers to the expenditure of real estate developers necessary for organizing and managing real estate development and operation activities, including staff wage and welfare fee, office expense and travel expense of real estate developers. Based on the construction cost of buildings, management expense is calculated at 3% of the construction cost during the valuation. The valuation assumes the residential land value as V.
Management expense=(8,289.81+1.0305V)×3%
≈248.69+ 3.1%V (RMB’0,000)
– 112 –
SUMMARY OF BUSINESS VALUATION REPORT
APPENDIX II
7. Calculation of sales expense
It refers to the expense necessary for pre-sale of the real estate that will be developed in the future or for sale of the real estate that has been developed, including advertising fee, sales materials production fee, model housing or model room construction cost, sales office construction cost, sales personnel expense or sales agent fee. Based on the value after development is completed, and in combination with the situation of this project, sales expense is calculated at 3.0% of the value after development is completed during the valuation, then:
Sales expense=17,408.60×3.0%≈522.26 (RMB’0,000)
8. Calculation of investment interest
The development cycle and interest rate of real estate are determined based on the actual conditions. Based on the total prepaid capital (including the desired land value, land acquisition tax, housing construction cost and management expense and sales expense), and the project construction cycle of 3.0 years, assuming that the land value V and land acquisition tax are invested in lump sum at the beginning of the construction cycle, housing construction cost and management expense and sales expense are invested evenly during the construction cycle, and the interest rate takes the 1-5 years loan interest rate of 4.75% implemented from 24 October 2015, as calculated based on compound interest, then:
Investment interest = (land price + land acquisition tax) ×[(1 + interest rate)[3] -1] + (housing construction cost + management expense + sales expense) ×[(1 + interest rate)[3/2] -1]
=V×(1+3.05%)×[(1+4.75%)[3] -1]+( 8,289.81+248.69+3.1%V+522.26)×[(1+4.75%)[3/2] -1]
≈653.19+0.1562V (RMB’0,000)
9. Calculation of sales tax
Sales tax refers to the tax paid by the seller for pre-sale or sale of the real estate after development is completed, including value-added tax, urban construction and maintenance tax, education surcharge and stamp duty. Through investigation and calculation, it was determined that the total cost of this item is about 5.4% of the value of the real estate after development is completed, and 5.4% is taken for the valuation.
Sales tax=17,408.60×5.4%≈940.06 (RMB’0,000)
– 113 –
SUMMARY OF BUSINESS VALUATION REPORT
APPENDIX II
10. Calculation of development profit
Profit refers to the average profit that real estate developers can obtain from real estate developments under normal conditions. The valuation takes sales profit to calculate its development profit. Based on the scale of buildings of the valuation object and other conditions, 15% is taken with reference to the average level of good sales profit margin of real estate developers published in the Enterprise Performance Valuation Standard Value in the past five years, and in combination with the average sales profit margin of the local residential real estate development industry, then:
Profit = total price after development completed ×profit margin=17,408.60×15%≈2,611.29 (RMB’0,000)
11. Calculation of land price
Land price = value after development completed –(land acquisition tax + housing construction cost + management expense + sales expense + investment interest + sales tax) –profit, then:
V=17,408.60-(3.05%V+8,289.81+248.69+3.1%V+522.26+653.19+0.1562V +940.06)-2,611.29
≈3,402.56 (RMB’0,000)
Commercial land unit price = total land price ÷land area
=3,402.56×10,000÷11,278.65
≈3,017 (RMB/m[2] )
– 114 –
SUMMARY OF BUSINESS VALUATION REPORT
APPENDIX II
12. Determination of valuation result of land price
(1) Method for determination of land price
According to the technical regulations for land price valuation and the specific conditions of the land subject to valuation, the valuation results are as follows:
| Land use Unit land price in valuation results (RMB/m2) Market comparison approach Residue approach Commercial 3,094 3,017 |
|
|---|---|
The appraisers are of the view that: the calculation principles of market comparison approach and cost approximation approach are different. Both approaches can reflect the land price of valuation object from different aspects, and there is little difference in the calculation results of the two approaches. Therefore, the simple arithmetic average of the two calculation results is used to determine the final price in the valuation (i.e. calculation weight of 50% for each), as detailed in the following table:
| Land use | Market comparison approach Residue approach Area of land parcel (m2) Calculation results (RMB/m2) Weight Calculation results (RMB/m2) Weight |
Unit land price Total land price (RMB’0,000) RMB/m2 RMB’0,000/ Mu 3,056 203.73 3,446.76 |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Commercial | 3,094 50% 3,017 50% 11,278.65 |
– 115 –
SUMMARY OF BUSINESS VALUATION REPORT
APPENDIX II
(2) Valuation results
After investigation and analysis of the land parcel of the valuation object and the area in which it is located, the appraisers calculated the market price of the land use right using a scientific valuation approach in accordance with the basic principles of land appraisal and relevant laws and regulations, based on the conditions of the valuation date, the set development degree, the set use, the set land use and current conditions, and the set term conditions:
| Real Estate Title Certificate No. Use Area of land parcel (m2) Unit land price (RMB/m2) Total price (RMB’0,000) Jin Kai Guo Yong (2016) No. 0207005 Commercial 11,278.65 (equivalent to 16.92 Mu) 3,056 (equivalent to RMB2,037,300/Mu) 3,446.76 |
|
|---|---|
(III) Land parcel 3: Jin (2018) Jin Zhong Shi Bu Dong Chan Quan No. 0006414
1. Assumptions for the valuation
The valuation assumes that the valuation object can successfully complete the expected development and construction goals, and the project construction cycle is 3.0 years; the construction and installation costs are invested evenly during the project cycle, and the interest is calculated based on compound interest. Although the payment of the total price of real estates and various costs occurs in the future, all data of the total price of real estates and the costs used in the residue approach valuation are future data determined based on their current level. It is assumed that the key variables involved in the residue approach valuation will not change significantly during the development period, and the project are leased or sold out in full after completion.
2. Determination of the best method to develop and utilize land
In the valuation, the best development and utilization method is determined according to the planning conditions of the land parcel subject to valuation. Ordinary residential buildings are constructed with supporting commercial real estates, equipped with water supply, sewage, electricity, heating, telecommunication and other infrastructure. It is assumed that the commercial buildings will be mainly rented out for operation after completion, the standard of whose delivery is the same can be directly used after decoration.
– 116 –
SUMMARY OF BUSINESS VALUATION REPORT
APPENDIX II
The total area of the land parcel subject to valuation is 41,690.83 m[2] , of which the apportioned area for residential land is 36,604.55 m[2] and the apportioned area for commercial land is 5,086.28 m[2] . The plot ratio is assumed to be 2.0 according to the planning conditions during the valuation, then:
Planned commercial buildings GFA = 5,086.28 × 2.0 ≈ 10,172.56 (m[2] )
3. Calculation of the value of the valuation object after development is completed
Through the investigation of commercial real estate leasing and sales market in the area where the land parcel subject to valuation is located, the appraisers determined after calculation that the average market price of commercial real estates on the land parcel subject to valuation is RMB7,500/m[2] based on objective rental income, vacancy rate, return rate and other relevant data of similar commercial real estates in the area, and in combination with the actual conditions of the valuation object.
It was determined that the average selling price of commercial buildings on the land parcel subject to valuation is RMB7,500/m[2] .
Value of the real estate after development completed = selling price × GFA
Value of ordinary residential real estate = 7500 x 10,172.56 ≈ 7,629.42 (RMB’0,000)
4. Calculation of land acquisition tax
Land acquisition tax includes deed tax of 3% and stamp tax of 0.5‰, etc., totaling 0.0305V (V is the land parcel price of the valuation object).
5. Calculation of housing construction cost
The construction cost of the housings built by the valuation object is estimated based on the planning conditions, building structure, ancillary facilities and decoration and other design standards of the valuation object abovementioned.
– 117 –
SUMMARY OF BUSINESS VALUATION REPORT
APPENDIX II
Construction Cost Calculation Sheet
| Amount | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No. | Item | (RMB/m2) | Explanation | |||||
| It includes the civil engineering cost, | ||||||||
| installation cost, decoration cost and other | ||||||||
| costs incurred in the construction of buildings | ||||||||
| and ancillary works. The construction and | ||||||||
| 1 | Construction and installation costs | 2,800 | installation costs are determined to be | |||||
| RMB2,300/m2 according to the relevant quota, | ||||||||
| with reference to the investment of similar | ||||||||
| buildings and in combination with the local | ||||||||
| actual conditions during the valuation. | ||||||||
| It includes preliminary | research fees (including | |||||||
| market research fee, feasibility study fee, | ||||||||
| project planning fee), exploration and design | ||||||||
| cost (including project exploration cost, | ||||||||
| environmental impact assessment fee, traffic | ||||||||
| impact assessment fee, | planning and design | |||||||
| 2 | Exploration, design | and preliminary | 140 | fee), construction project bidding fee and the | ||||
| engineering costs | necessary expenses for | preliminary work such | ||||||
| as “three supplies and one leveling” at the | ||||||||
| construction site and temporary housing. Based | ||||||||
| on the scale, complexity and building structure | ||||||||
| of projects of the valuation object, the | ||||||||
| valuation is calculated at 5% of the | ||||||||
| construction and installation costs. | ||||||||
| It refers to the construction cost for ancillary | ||||||||
| roads, water supply, drainage, electricity, | ||||||||
| communications, gas, heating and other | ||||||||
| facilities required by urban planning from the | ||||||||
| project land red line to | the building base. | |||||||
| 3 | Infrastructure construction cost | 280 | Based on the construction and installation | |||||
| costs, it is generally determined at a ratio of | ||||||||
| 5%-15%. Based on the | scale, complexity and | |||||||
| building structure of projects of the valuation | ||||||||
| object, the valuation is | calculated at 10% of the | |||||||
| construction and installation costs. |
– 118 –
SUMMARY OF BUSINESS VALUATION REPORT
APPENDIX II
| Amount | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No. | Item | (RMB/m2) | Explanation | ||||||||
| Public facilities | construction cost refers to the | ||||||||||
| cost for municipal public facilities and green | |||||||||||
| spaces in residential areas, mainly including | |||||||||||
| education, medical and health, culture and | |||||||||||
| sports, commercial services, administrative | |||||||||||
| 4 | Public facilities cost | 140 | management and community services and green | ||||||||
| spaces. According to relevant national | |||||||||||
| requirements and with reference to the local | |||||||||||
| public facilities | cost of similar buildings, it is | ||||||||||
| generally calculated as 5% of the construction | |||||||||||
| and installation | costs. | ||||||||||
| Including relevant taxes and fees charged by | |||||||||||
| local governments or their relevant | |||||||||||
| departments, such as greening construction | |||||||||||
| cost, civil air defense project fee, urban | |||||||||||
| temporary land fee, municipal and cultural | |||||||||||
| pipeline apportionment fee, initial telephone | |||||||||||
| 5 | Taxes | and unforeseen fees during development | 140 | installation fee, decentralized construction of municipal public facilities construction cost, |
|||||||
| construction waste disposal fee and other | |||||||||||
| expenses. They are generally determined at a | |||||||||||
| ratio of 2%-5% | based on the construction and | ||||||||||
| installation costs and taking into account | |||||||||||
| unforeseen fees. | This item is calculated at 5% | ||||||||||
| of the construction and installation costs. | |||||||||||
| Unit price of housing construction cost = | |||||||||||
| construction and installation costs + | |||||||||||
| 6 | Unit price of construction cost | 3,500 | exploration, design and preliminary engineering costs + infrastructure construction cost + public |
||||||||
| facilities construction cost + taxes and | |||||||||||
| unforeseen fees | during development. |
Total residential construction cost = 3,500 × 10,172.56 ≈ 3,560.40 (RMB’0,000)
– 119 –
SUMMARY OF BUSINESS VALUATION REPORT
APPENDIX II
6. Calculation of management expense
Management expense refers to the expenditure of real estate developers necessary for organizing and managing real estate development and operation activities, including staff wage and welfare fee, office expense and travel expense of real estate developers. Based on the construction cost of buildings, management expense is calculated at 3% of the construction cost during the valuation. The valuation assumes the residential land value as V.
Management expense = (3,560.40 + 1.0305V) × 3% ≈ 106.81 + 3.1%V (RMB’0,000)
7. Calculation of sales expense
It refers to the expense necessary for pre-sale of the real estate that will be developed in the future or for sale of the real estate that has been developed, including advertising fee, sales materials production fee, model housing or model room construction cost, sales office construction cost, sales personnel expense or sales agent fee. Based on the value after development is completed, and in combination with the situation of this project, sales expense is calculated at 3.0% of the value after development is completed during the valuation, then:
Sales expense = 7,629.42 × 3.0% ≈ 228.88 (RMB’0,000)
8. Calculation of investment interest
The development cycle and interest rate of real estate are determined based on the actual conditions. Based on the total prepaid capital (including the desired land value, land acquisition tax, housing construction cost and management expense and sales expense), and the project construction cycle of 3.0 years, assuming that the land value V and land acquisition tax are invested in lump sum at the beginning of the construction cycle, housing construction cost and management expense and sales expense are invested evenly during the construction cycle, and the interest rate takes the 1-5 years loan interest rate of 4.75% implemented from 24 October 2015, as calculated based on compound interest, then:
Investment interest = (land price + land acquisition tax) × [(1 + interest rate)[3] -1] + (housing construction cost + management expense + sales expense) × [(1 + interest rate)[3/2] -1]
= V × (1 + 3.05%) × [(l + 4.75%)[3] -1] + (3,560.40 + 106.81 + 3.1%V + 228.88) × [(1 +4.75%)[3/2] -1]
≈ 280.87 + 0.1562V (RMB’0,000)
– 120 –
SUMMARY OF BUSINESS VALUATION REPORT
APPENDIX II
9. Calculation of sales tax
Sales tax refers to the tax paid by the seller for pre-sale or sale of the real estate after development is completed, including value-added tax, urban construction and maintenance tax, education surcharge and stamp duty. Through investigation and calculation, it was determined that the total cost of this item is about 5.4% of the value of the real estate after development is completed, and 5.4% is taken for the valuation.
Sales tax = 7,629.42 × 5.4% ≈ 411.99 (RMB’0,000)
10. Calculation of development profit
Profit refers to the average profit that real estate developers can obtain from real estate developments under normal conditions. The valuation takes sales profit to calculate its development profit. Based on the scale of buildings of the valuation object and other conditions, 15% is taken with reference to the average level of good sales profit margin of real estate developers published in the Enterprise Performance Valuation Standard Value in the past five years, and in combination with the average sales profit margin of the local residential real estate development industry, then:
Profit = total price after development completed × profit margin = 7,629.42 × 15% ≈ 1,144.41 (RMB’0,000)
11. Calculation of land price
Land price = value after development completed — (land acquisition tax + housing construction cost + management expense + sales expense + investment interest + sales tax) — profit, then:
- V = 7,629.42 — (3.05%V + 3,560.40 + 106.81 + 3.l%V + 228.88 + 280.87 + 0.1562V +411.99) — 1,144.41 ≈ 1,557.08 (RMB’0,000)
Commercial land unit price = total land price ÷ land area
-
= 1,557.08 × 10,000 ÷ 5,086.28
-
≈ 3,061 (RMB/m[2] )
– 121 –
SUMMARY OF BUSINESS VALUATION REPORT
APPENDIX II
12. Determination of valuation result of land price
(1) Method for determination of land price
According to the technical regulations for land price valuation and the specific conditions of the land subject to valuation, the valuation results are as follows:
| Land use Unit land price in valuation results (RMB/m2) Market comparison approach Residue approach Residential 3,073 3,191 Commercial 3,174 3,061 |
|
|---|---|
The appraisers are of the view that: the calculation principles of market comparison approach and residue approach are different. Both approaches can reflect the land price of valuation object from different aspects, and there is little difference in the calculation results of the two approaches. Therefore, the arithmetic average of the two calculation results is used to determine the final price in the valuation, as detailed in the following table:
| Land use Market comparison approach Residue approach Area of land parcel (m 2) Calculation results (RMB/m 2) Weight Calculation results (RMB/m 2) Weight |
Unit land price Total land price RMB/m 2 RMB’0,000/Mu 3,132 208. 80 11,464.55 3,118 207. 87 1,585.90 |
|
|---|---|---|
| Residential 3,073 50% 3,191 50% 36,604. 55 |
||
| Commercial 3,174 50% 3,061 50% 5,086. 28 |
– 122 –
SUMMARY OF BUSINESS VALUATION REPORT
APPENDIX II
(2) Valuation results
After investigation and analysis of the land parcel of the valuation object and the area in which it is located, the appraisers calculated the market price of the land use right using a scientific valuation approach in accordance with the basic principles of land appraisal and relevant laws and regulations, based on the conditions of the valuation date, the set development degree, the set use, the set land use and current conditions:
| Area of | Area of | Unit | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| **Real Estate ** | Title | land parcel | land price | Total price | ||||||||||
| **Certificate ** | No. | Use | (m2) | (RMB/m2) | (RMB’0,000) | |||||||||
| Jin | (2018) Jin Zhong | Shi Bu Dong Residential |
36,604.55 | 3,132 | 13,050.45 | |||||||||
| Chan Quan No. | 0006414 | (equivalent to54.91 | (equivalent to | |||||||||||
| Mu) | RMB2,088,000/ | |||||||||||||
| Mu) | ||||||||||||||
| Commercial | 5,086.28 | 3,118 | ||||||||||||
| (equivalent to7.63 | (equivalent to | |||||||||||||
| Mu) | RMB2,078,700/Mu) |
5) Valuation conclusion of development costs
| Area of land | Area of land | Area of land | Unit land price | Unit land price | Total price | Total price | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Real Estate Title Certificate No. | Use parcel (m2) |
(RMB/m2) | (RMB’0,000) | ||||||||||
| Jin Kai Guo Yong (2016) | Commercial | 5,131.18 | 3,119 | 1,600.42 | |||||||||
| No. 0207003 (land parcel 1) | (equivalent to | (equivalent to | |||||||||||
| 7,70 Mu) | RMB2,079,300/) | ||||||||||||
| Jin Kai Guo Yong (2016) | Residential | 12,409.27 | 2,925 | 3,629.71 | |||||||||
| No. 0207004 (land parcel 4) | (equivalent to | ||||||||||||
| RMB1,950,000/ | |||||||||||||
| Mu) | |||||||||||||
| Jin Kai Guo Yong (2016) | Commercial | 11,278.65 | 3,056 | 3,446.76 | |||||||||
| No. 0207004 (land parcel 2) | (equivalent to | ||||||||||||
| RMB2,037,300/ | |||||||||||||
| Mu) |
– 123 –
SUMMARY OF BUSINESS VALUATION REPORT
APPENDIX II
| Area of land | Area of land | Unit land price | Unit land price | Total price | Total price | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Real Estate Title Certificate No. | Use | parcel (m2) | (RMB/m2) | (RMB’0,000) | ||||||||||
| Jin (2018) Jin | Zhong Shi Bu | Residential | 36,604.55 | 3,132 | 13,050.45 | |||||||||
| Dong Chan Quan No. 0006414 | (equivalent to | (equivalent to | ||||||||||||
| (land parcel 3) | 54.91 Mu) | RMB2,088,000/ | ||||||||||||
| Mu) | ||||||||||||||
| Commercial | 5,086.28 | 3,118 | ||||||||||||
| (equivalent to | (equivalent to | |||||||||||||
| 7.63 Mu) | RMB2,078,700/ | |||||||||||||
| Mu) | ||||||||||||||
| Total | 70,509.93 | 21,727.34 | ||||||||||||
| (equivalent to | ||||||||||||||
| 105.76 Mu) |
According to the above valuation approach, the total appraised value of development costs is RMB2,293,468,484.97, comprising of (1) the appraised value of self-operated project in the amount of RMB241,369,057.27 and (2) the book value of the entrusted construction projects in the amount of RMB2,052,099,427.70.
In particular, the appraised value of the self-owned project of RMB241,369,057.27 includes the state-owned land use right price (i.e. the appraised value of the four land parcels of RMB217,273,400) as well as various land-related expenses already incurred. In particular, the land-related expenses of land parcel 3 and land parcel 4 include survey fees, design fees, engineering fees, supervision fees, consulting fees, employee remuneration, interests, office fees, labour protection fees, etc., and amount to RMB5,866,682.56 and RMB18,228,974.71, respectively. Land parcel 1 and land parcel 2 have no land-related expenses. As mentioned in section 3.1.1.3. below, the appraised values of these land-related expenses for land parcel 3 and land parcel 4 are determined according to their carrying amount.
3.1.1.2. Deed tax
According to the economic behavior and the purpose of valuation, deed tax is not considered in the valuation. Deed tax has not recorded any book value or appraised value for the purpose of this valuation.
– 124 –
SUMMARY OF BUSINESS VALUATION REPORT
APPENDIX II
- 3.1.1.3. Survey fees, design fees, construction road water and electricity engineering fees, other infrastructure fees, engineering survey fees
According to the balance sheet and audit report provided by the valued unit, we checked the consistency of the general ledger and detailed accounts, verified the accuracy of the book balance, and conducted spot check of the relevant accounting vouchers, to verify the authenticity of the business and determine whether the accounts are consistent with the actual conditions. The appraised value is determined according to the carrying amount on the basis of confirming consistency.
(2) Product development
1) Overview of product development
The product development consists of (1) 3 residential commodity apartments; (2) 247 underground parking spaces unsold or returned and (3) a community centre in “Phase I of Yijun Community” which has been developed and completed by Jinzhong Development Zone Real Estate Development Co., Ltd.
The “Phase I of Yijun Community” project is located at No. 1080, Longhu West Street, Yuci District, Jinzhong City (South of Huazhang Street (Longhu West Street), Development Zone, east of Xueyuan Road). The land use is other ordinary commercial residential land, with a total land area of 46,762.59m[2] . On 31 January 2019, the construction project planning permit (No. 140700201900025) was obtained, with a total GFA of 116,657.24m[2] , of which 11 residential buildings are well-decorated mid-rise buildings with a total GFA of 91,321.7m[2] , including the community centre of 1,444.48m[2] and the underground garage 23,382.54m[2] .
As of the appraisal reference date, the development and construction of the real estate had completed for 7 residential buildings and related supporting facilities, with a total GFA of 83,125.84m[2] and a floor area of 51.53Mu, including residential housings of 62,523.82m[2] , underground garage of 19,157.54m[2] and community centre of 1,444.48m[2] .
The remaining three unsold residential housings in the valuation, with a total GFA of 320.41m[2] , have been granted the real estate title certificates, with a carrying value of RMB2,042,969.40; 247 underground parking spaces not for civil air defense purpose have a carrying value of RMB23,927,784.07; the “community centre” is a public supporting facility with a carrying amount of RMB2,453,588.27, which is apportioned to the costs of four unbuilt buildings in Phase I of Yijun Community.
– 125 –
SUMMARY OF BUSINESS VALUATION REPORT
APPENDIX II
3.1.2. Product development
Product development includes (1) unsold residential commodity apartments, (2) underground parking spaces and (3) a community centre.
3.1.2.1. Unsold residential commodity apartments
According to the Code for Real Estate Appraisal (房地產估價規範), the major valuation approaches for real estate include comparison approach, income approach, cost approach, and hypothetical development approach, etc. Following the principles of objectivity, independence and impartiality, the comparison approach is selected for the unsold residential commodity apartments in accordance with the Code for Real Estate Appraisal (房地產估價規範), the development condition of the local property market as well as the specific characteristics of the valuation object and the purpose of the valuation.
Comparison approach: it is an approach to evaluate the value or price of a valuation object through processing the transaction price of comparable cases based on the differences between them after selecting a certain number of comparable cases for the valuation object. As the purpose of the valuation object is residential commodity apartments and according to the information provided by the principal, the appraisers learned through market survey that there were many similar real estate transaction cases in the area, it is suitable to use the comparison method for valuation, so as to reflect the market price of the valuation object more accurately. The calculation formula is as follows:
Comparable price = transaction price of comparable case × transaction correction coefficient × market condition adjustment coefficient × location adjustment coefficient × physical condition adjustment coefficient × equity adjustment coefficient.
Calculation with Room 6-2-403 of Phase I of Yijun Community as an example:
In the recent real estate market, we selected the existing real estate transactions which are highly correlated and replaceable with the valuation object, all with the same entitlement status and within the same parameters of supply and demand, with those factors affecting the real estate market, such as the locations, features, transaction dates and transaction status all taken into account while making our analysis, comparison and correction based on their actual circumstances, so as to arrive at a reasonable market price of the valuation object.
– 126 –
SUMMARY OF BUSINESS VALUATION REPORT
APPENDIX II
1. Selection of comparables
Through market research and inquiries with the competent authorities, we have chosen a non-exhaustive list of transaction subjects in accordance with the Asset Valuation Standards and Code for Real Estate Appraisal, that:
-
Comparables shall be selected from transaction instances and not less than three;
-
Comparables should be traded in a manner suitable for valuation purposes;
-
The real estate in comparables should be similar to the real estate in the valuation object;
-
The transaction date of the comparables should be close to the valuation date, and the time interval between the dates is not suitable to be more than one year and should not exceed two years;
-
The transaction price of the comparables should be the normal price or can be corrected to the normal price;
-
Under the same conditions, the transaction instances with location, transaction date and valuation date close to the valuation object should be selected as the comparables.
Based on the above provisions, we narrowed down the group of transaction subjects to the three comparables in line with our preset requirements, i.e. similar location (or in the same supply and demand circle), same entitlement status, same purpose, same transaction type and similar valuation date. In particular, the comparables selected are (1) of same purpose being residential housings; (2) situated in Phase III of Xinxing Cultural and Education City, Chenxing Yijun and Agile Xiyuan; (3) of mixed structure; (4) with good to average decoration condition, traffic conditions, environment, floor pattern and property management service; (5) complete infrastructure; (6) relatively complete public facilities; and (7) with transaction dates close to the appraisal reference date, i.e. 30 September 2023.
Details of the comparables are as follows:
Case A: A residential housing in Phase III of Xinxing Cultural and Education City, which is on the 2nd of the 12 floors, with a GFA of 218 m[2] , mixed structure, north-south orientation, decent decoration condition, completed and delivered in 2002, and sold at RMB6,453/m[2] in 2023;
– 127 –
SUMMARY OF BUSINESS VALUATION REPORT
APPENDIX II
Case B: A residential housing in Chenxing Yijun, which is on the 8th of the 10 floors, with a GFA of 104 m[2] , mixed structure, north-south orientation, decent decoration condition, completed and delivered in 2002, and sold at RMB7,212/m[2] in 2023;
Case C: A residential housing in Agile Xiyuan, which is on the 12th of the 24 floors, with a GFA of 104 m[2] , mixed structure, north-south orientation, average decoration condition, completed and delivered in 2003, and sold at RMB7,500/m[2] in 2023.
Table of comparative factors and conditions for comparables
| Cases | Valuation object | Valuation object | Case A | Case A | **Case ** | B | **Case ** | C | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Name of Complex | Phase I of Yijun Community |
Phase III of Xinxing Cultural and Education City |
Chenxing Yijun | Agile Xiyuan | |||||||||
| Year of Transaction | — | 2023 | 2023 | 2023 | |||||||||
| Transaction (RMB/m2) |
price | — | 6,453 | 7,212 | 7,500 | ||||||||
| Purpose | Residential | Residential | Residential | Residential | |||||||||
| Structure | Mixed | Mixed | Mixed | Mixed | |||||||||
| Area (m2) | 86.12 | 218 | 104 | 104 | |||||||||
| Decoration | condition | Decent | Average | Decent | Decent | ||||||||
| Orientation | South | North and South | North and South | North and South | |||||||||
| Floor | 4/11 | 2/12 | 8/10 | l2/24 | |||||||||
| Year of completion | 2020 | 2006 | 2019 | 2020 | |||||||||
| Traffic conditions | Good | Good | Good | Good | |||||||||
| Environment | Good | Average | Good | Good | |||||||||
| Infrastructure | Complete | Complete | Complete | Complete | |||||||||
| Public facilities | Relatively complete | Relatively complete | Relatively complete | Relatively complete | |||||||||
| Floor pattern | Good | Good | Good | Good | |||||||||
| Property management | Good | Good | Good | Good | |||||||||
| service |
– 128 –
SUMMARY OF BUSINESS VALUATION REPORT
APPENDIX II
2. Correction of comparables
(1) Correction of transaction conditions
Comparables A, B and C are all normal market transactions, hence the correction coefficient for transaction conditions of 100/100 for all.
(2) Correction of transaction date
As the transaction dates of comparables A, B and C are close to the valuation date, and the prices of such type of properties are relatively stable within the same supply and demand circle, the correction coefficient for transaction date is 100/100 as well.
(3) Correction of location factors
Table of correction coefficients for location factors
| Comparables Comparative factors Traffic conditions Surrounding environment Public supporting facilities Infrastructure Floor Orientation Sub-total |
|
|---|---|
– 129 –
SUMMARY OF BUSINESS VALUATION REPORT
APPENDIX II
(4) Correction of physical factors
Table of physical factor correction coefficients
| Comparables Comparative factors Decoration Year of completion GFA Floor pattern Property management service Sub-total Case A -3 -4 -6 0 0 -13 Case B 0 0 -1 0 0 -l Case C 0 0 -1 0 0 -1 |
|
|---|---|
3. Comparison correction
Table of comparison correction
The following is the table of comparison correction for the residential housing 1 (Room 2-403 of Phase I of Yijun Community):
| Comparables Unit price (RMB/m2) Correction coefficient for transaction conditions Correction coefficient for transaction date Correction coefficient for location factors Correction coefficient for physical factors Unit price after correction (RMB/m2) Apprised unit price (RMB/m2) Case A 6,453 100/100 100/100 100/96.5 100/87 7,686 7,350 Case B 7,212 100/100 100/100 100/102.5 100/99 7,107 Case C 7,500 100/100 100/100 100/104.5 100/99 7,250 |
|
|---|---|
– 130 –
SUMMARY OF BUSINESS VALUATION REPORT
APPENDIX II
The following is the table of comparison correction for the residential housing 2 (Room 4-1-801 of Phase I of Yijun Community):
| Comparables Unit price (RMB/m2) Correction coefficient for transaction conditions Correction coefficient for transaction date Correction coefficient for location factors Correction coefficient for physical factors Unit price after correction (RMB/m2) Apprised unit price (RMB/m2) Case A 6,453 100/100 100/100 100/94 100/88 7,801 7,460 Case B 7,212 100/100 100/100 100/100 100/100 7,212 Case C 7,500 100/100 100/100 100/102 100/100 7,353 |
|
|---|---|
The following is the table of comparison correction for the residential housing 3 (Room 4-2-101 of Phase I of Yijun Community):
| Comparables Unit price (RMB/m2) Correction coefficient for transaction conditions Correction coefficient for transaction date Correction coefficient for location factors Correction coefficient for physical factors Unit price after correction (RMB/m2) Apprised unit price (RMB/m2) Case A 6,453 100/100 100/100 100/99 100/88 7,407 7,100 Case B 7,212 100/100 100/100 100/105 100/100 6,869 Case C 7,500 100/100 100/100 100/107 100/100 7,009 |
|
|---|---|
Note: 1. Unit price after correction = transaction price of object of comparison × correction coefficient for transaction conditions × correction coefficient for transaction date × correction coefficient for location factors × correction coefficient for condition factors;
- Appraised unit price is the arithmetic average of the three unit prices after correction, with the calculation results accurate to 2 decimal places.
According to the site investigation, Room 4-2-101 of Phase I of Yijun Community is located on the first floor and has a small courtyard that can be used for a long time with the residence. It is understood through the investigation that the value of residential housings with a small courtyard in the area is about 20% higher than that of ordinary residential housings, so adjustment is made according to the influence of this factor on the value of ordinary residential housings with the adjustment coefficient of 120/100.
– 131 –
SUMMARY OF BUSINESS VALUATION REPORT
APPENDIX II
The market value of Room 4-2-101 of Phase I of Yijun Community is:
7100×120/100≈8520 (RMB/m[2] )
4. Determination of the value of valuation object
Total value of the real estate of residential housing 1 = appraised unit price × GFA
= RMB7,350 × 86.12 ≈ RMB632,982
Total value of the real estate of residential housing 2 = appraised unit price x GFA
= 7,460 × 118.38 ≈ 883,114 (RMB)
Total value of the real estate of residential housing 3 = appraised unit price x GFA
= 8,520 x 115.91 ≈ 987,553 (RMB)
The appraised value of the three residential housings is as follows:
| GFA | **Appraised ** | **Appraised ** | unit | Total appraised | Total appraised | Total appraised | Price exclusive of | Price exclusive of | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No. | Valuation object | (m2) | price (RMB/m2) |
price (RMB) |
tax (RMB) |
|||||||||||||
| 1 | Room 2-403, Phase I of Yijun Community |
86.12 | 7,350 | 632,982 | 580,717 | |||||||||||||
| Room 4-1-801, | ||||||||||||||||||
| 2 | Phase I of Yijun | 118.38 | 7,460 | 883,115 | 810,197 | |||||||||||||
| Community | ||||||||||||||||||
| Room 4-2-101, | ||||||||||||||||||
| 3 | Phase I of Yijun | 115.91 | 8,520 | 987,553 | 906,012 | |||||||||||||
| Community |
– 132 –
SUMMARY OF BUSINESS VALUATION REPORT
APPENDIX II
3.1.2.2. Unsold underground parking spaces
The underground parking spaces of the valuation object have not undergone the necessary property ownership procedures. Through the investigation, it has been determined that the underground parking spaces of the valuation object can generate income through rental, therefore, the income approach has been selected to assess the value of the use rights of the underground parking spaces.
Income approach: it is an approach to predict the future income of the valuation object, and convert the future income into value or price of the valuation object by using the appropriate rate of return or capitalization rate and income multiplier.
There are 247 underground parking spaces in the valuation object, which are developed as inventory products, and the value of the use rights may slightly vary depending on the location. Based on the valuation purpose, the average value of the use rights for the parking spaces was calculated using the income approach.
1. Calculation of the average annual net income per parking space
Through the investigation, we have learned that the underground parking spaces in the valuation object can be rented out to generate income. They are typically classified into long-term rentals (with a maximum rental period of 20 years) and short-term rentals (on an annual basis). For the purpose of valuation, the rental income is considered on an annual basis.
According to the market survey conducted by the appraisers, the monthly rental for underground parking spaces in the area of the valuation object ranges from RMB250/month to RMB350/month. Considering the specific circumstances of the valuation object, the average monthly rental income for the parking spaces is determined to be RMB300/month, resulting in an annual rental income of RMB3,600. It is also understood that the annual vacancy rate for parking spaces of the same type in the area of the valuation object is approximately 10%.
Annual Net Income A = Annual Rent x (1 — Vacancy Rate)
=3,600×(1-10%) ≈3,240(RMB)
– 133 –
SUMMARY OF BUSINESS VALUATION REPORT
APPENDIX II
Based on the investigation, it has been determined that lease income for real estate typically occurs at the beginning of the lease term. However, the income approach formula for capitalizing returns assumes that the net income of future periods will occur at the end of the lease term, rather than the reference date. In this case, the comparable examples all have lease income at the beginning of the lease term. Therefore, the net income needs to be adjusted using the following formula: End of A = Beginning of A (1+Y).
Then the valuation object: End of A = Beginning of A (1+Y) = 3,240 x (1+Y).
2. Determination of the return rate (Y)
The return rate of real estate essentially represents the earnings yield of real estate investment assets. According to the Real Estate Valuation Regulations, the return rate can be determined using the safe rate plus the risk-adjusted value method. The safe interest rate can be selected from the annual interest rate of one-year treasury bonds or the annual interest rate of one-year fixed-term lump-sum deposits published by the People’s Bank of China. The risk-adjusted value should be determined based on the current economic situation, future forecasts of the region where the valuation object is located, as well as the usage and age of the valuation object. In line with the principle of the safe interest rate plus risk adjustment, we have selected the one-year deposit rate of 1.5% published by the People’s Bank of China on 24 October 2015, as the safe rate. Considering the social, political, economic, and environmental factors that impact the value of real estate in the region where the valuation object is located on the reference day, we have chosen 6.0% as the risk-adjusted value, resulting in a return rate (Y) of 7.5%.
3. Determination of the income-generating years (n)
The valuation object was constructed in 2020, and its reinforced concrete structure has a durability of 60 years. As of the reference date, the valuation object has been in use for 2 years. Therefore, the remaining useful life of the building is 58 years. According to the information provided by the client, the remaining term of the land use right as of the reference day is 63.13 years. Applying the principle of the shorter term, the determined income-generating years is 58 years.
– 134 –
SUMMARY OF BUSINESS VALUATION REPORT
APPENDIX II
4. Determination of net income incremental rate (g)
Taking into account the correlation between the increase in rental prices and inflation, and with reference to the latest CPI published by the National Bureau of Statistics of China, the net income incremental rate of the valuation object has been determined to be 2.0% per annum, which was made after a comprehensive analysis conducted by the appraisers, considering the economic conditions of the region where the valuation object is located, the rental market conditions of similar properties, and the specific circumstances of the valuation object.
5. Determination of the value of a parking space
==> picture [196 x 111] intentionally omitted <==
As this valuation is based on the average price of all the parking spaces, it has been rounded to the nearest RMB603,000,000, following the practice of leasing and selling parking spaces.
– 135 –
SUMMARY OF BUSINESS VALUATION REPORT
APPENDIX II
6. Determination of the total value of the use rights for all inventory parking spaces
60,300×247=14,894,100(RMB)
The valuation results for inventory — development products, based on market value, should deduct the anticipated value-added tax (9% for output VAT, with a combined rate of approximately 4.30% for output tax minus input tax) and surcharges (12% of the VAT) that are expected to occur during the realization process, as well as the land value-added tax (1.50% for residential and 2.50% for non-residential, excluded based on project specifics), corporate income tax (calculated at an average gross profit of 10%, with a tax rate of 25%), sales management fee (3%), and interest rate (8.5%). The calculation results are summarized in the following table.
| Price | Total | |||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No. | Valuation object |
Price inclusive of tax (RMB) |
exclusive of tax (RMB) |
Value-added tax (RMB) |
Surcharge (RMB) Corporate income tax (RMB) |
Sales management fee (RMB) |
Profits (RMB) |
appraised value (RMB) |
||||||||||||||||
| Room | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 6-2-403, | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 1 | Phase I of | 632,982 | 580,717 | 27,218 | 3,266 14,518 |
17,422 | 49,361 | 496,150 | ||||||||||||||||
| Yijun | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Community | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Room | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 4-1-801, | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2 | Phase I of | 883,115 | 810,197 | 37,974 | 4,557 20,255 |
24,306 | 68,867 | 692,212 | ||||||||||||||||
| Yijun | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Community | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Room | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 4-2-101, | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 3 | Phase I of | 987,553 | 906,012 | 42,465 | 5,096 22,650 |
27,180 | 77,011 | 774,075 | ||||||||||||||||
| Yijun | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Community | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 4 | 247 parking | 14,894,100 | 13,664,312 | 640,446 | 76,854 341,608 |
409,929 | 1,161,467 | 11,674,454 | ||||||||||||||||
| spaces | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total | 13,636,891 |
– 136 –
SUMMARY OF BUSINESS VALUATION REPORT
APPENDIX II
- 3.1.2.3 Community centre
The audited carrying value of the community centre as at the appraisal reference date is RMB2,453,588.27, and is the cost appropriated to the four unbuilt buildings in Phase I of Yijun Community and the centre is a public supporting facility.
The appraisers first checked the declaration form and the general ledger, the detailed ledger and consulted the original vouchers to verify the correctness of the amount listed in the declaration form. On the basis of the verification of the assets of the project, the appraisers determined the appraised value according to the carrying value in accordance with the requirements of the relevant laws and regulations on asset appraisal.
The appraised value of the community centre is RMB2,453,588.27.
-
Calculation of the carrying amount of the community centre
-
(1) Estimated construction cost of the community centre: RMB8,339,864.96;
-
(2) 11 buildings should be built on the land parcel with an area of approximately 83,340.74 m[2] (Built) area of buildings 1-7: 58,828.28 m[2] Proportion 70.58% (Remaining unbuilt) area of buildings 8-11: 24,512.46 m[2] Proportion 29.42%
-
(3) Total construction cost * Proportion of remaining unbuilt area = 8,339,864.96*29.42% = RMB2,453,588.27
-
Reason for presentation of the community centre at carrying amount
The community centre is a public supporting building of the Phase I of Yijun Community, and part of its cost has been appropriated to the seven completed residential buildings, which have been sold. As the carrying value of the remaining community centre of RMB2,453,588.27 represents the cost to be appropriated to the four buildings that have not been built and is an incomplete asset, its carrying value is taken as the appraised value of the community centre in the valuation.
– 137 –
SUMMARY OF BUSINESS VALUATION REPORT
APPENDIX II
3.1.3 Monetary funds
The audited carrying value of the monetary funds as at appraisal reference date was RMB17,478,518.46, which are all bank deposits, involving a total of 18 accounts, all of which are RMB accounts.
The appraisers checked the book balance with the bank statement and the bank deposit reconciliation statement, and sent a letter to the bank for confirmation to verify the correctness of the bank deposit balance. The appraised value was determined based on the carrying value of the bank deposits after verification.
The appraised value of the bank deposits was RMB17,478,518.46.
3.1.4 Prepayments
The audited carrying value of the prepayments as at appraisal reference date was RMB12,900,078.89, and the accounting contents include the prepayments for projects, electricity charge, design fee, etc., of the valued entity.
The appraisers first checked the declaration form and the general ledger, the detailed accounts and consulted the original vouchers to verify the correctness of the amounts listed in the declaration form. On the basis of verifying the correctness of prepayments, the appraisers talked with the financial personnel and related personnel of the company according to the business contents, occurrence dates and amounts of clients listed in the schedule of prepayments as declared by the valued entity. The financial personnel and relevant personnel introduced the actual situation of the debtors in detail. In accordance with the requirements of the relevant laws and regulations of asset appraisal, the appraisers specifically analyzed the reasons for the formation of the prepayments, and determined the appraised value based on the carrying value of the payments for which the goods or corresponding services could be received after verification.
The appraised value of prepayments was RMB12,900,078.89.
3.1.5 Other receivables
The audited carrying value of other receivables as at appraisal reference date was RMB957,741,208.40, of which the carrying value of dividends receivable amounted to RMB61,683,500.00, and the accounting contents include various other receivables and temporary payments of the valued entity other than receivables and prepayments.
– 138 –
APPENDIX II
SUMMARY OF BUSINESS VALUATION REPORT
During the inspection, the appraisers first checked whether the detailed accounts were consistent with the general ledger and statement balances as well as the asset valuation schedule, checked accounting records such as payment amount, occurrence time, business contents, etc., and analyzed the aging of the accounts. Secondly, based on the principle of importance, the amount test was conducted on accounts with large amounts and long aging to verify the authenticity and completeness of other receivables. On the basis of verification, the amount that may be recovered for each payment was determined. Based on the above, the appraised value was determined based on the carrying value.
The appraised value of other receivables was RMB957,741,208.40, of which the appraised value of dividends receivable was RMB61,683,500.00.
3.1.6 Other current assets
The audited carrying value of the other current assets as at appraisal reference date was RMB106,968,609.83, mainly representing pre-paid taxes and surcharges, pending deduct input tax, etc.
The appraisers checked the declaration form and the general ledger, the detailed accounts and consulted the original vouchers to verify the correctness of the amounts listed in the declaration form. On the basis of verifying the correctness of prepaid taxes, the appraisers talked with the financial personnel and related personnel of the company according to the contents, occurrence dates and amounts listed in the schedule of prepaid taxes as declared by the valued entity. The financial personnel and relevant personnel introduced the actual situation of payments in detail. In accordance with the requirements of the relevant laws and regulations of asset appraisal, the appraisers specifically analyzed the reasons for the formation of the prepayments, and determined the appraised value based on the carrying value after verification.
The appraised value of other current assets was RMB106,968,609.83.
– 139 –
SUMMARY OF BUSINESS VALUATION REPORT
APPENDIX II
3.2 Long-term equity investment
Unit: RMB
==> picture [455 x 138] intentionally omitted <==
----- Start of picture text -----
Appreciation/
Name of the Date of Percentage of Cost of Appraised depreciation Appreciation
investee company investment shareholding investment Book value value amount rate
Jinzhong Xiya Real
Estate Development
Co., Ltd. (晉中熙雅
房地產開發有限公司)
(“ Jinzhong Xiya ”) 2018.4 67% 50,000,000.00 50,000,000.00 57,867,323.10 7,867,323.10 15.73%
----- End of picture text -----*
The extended valuation of Jinzhong Xiya had been performed with the appraised value of net assets of Jinzhong Xiya as at the appraisal reference date multiplied by the percentage of its equity interest of the valued entity.
The project developed and constructed by Jinzhong Xiya is “Xiyuan” (熙苑) project, which covers an area of 30.85Mu and has a floor area of 67,400m[2] . In the valuation, there were 2 residential properties (with a total floor area of 236.29m[2] ), 1 commercial property (with a total floor area of 49.02m[2] ) and 337 underground parking spaces left on the account.
The appreciation of long-term equity investment was mainly because the valuation of Jinzhong Xiya had been performed on the entirety of Jinzhong Xiya and the valuation would then be valued with reference to the appraised reference value of entire equity interests multiplied by the percentage of its equity interest, while the book value of the long term equity investment were accounted for using the cost method and thus there was the difference in the results.
The key quantified input values and assumptions used in the calculation of appraised value and the calculation process are as follows:
3.2.1 Valuation method for non-current assets
For the equity investment of Jinzhong Xiya, an overall valuation of the investee unit is carried out first, and the appraised value is determined based on the value of the entire equity interests of the shareholders after valuation multiplied by the shareholding ratio.
– 140 –
APPENDIX II
SUMMARY OF BUSINESS VALUATION REPORT
For the value of the entire equity interests of Jinzhong Xiya, the market approach is not considered in the valuation, mainly due to that compared with the outstanding shares of listed companies, comparable and effective reference objects are not available in the market for the equity interests of the above company; meanwhile, among the non-listed companies, due to the lack of market disclosure information, it is impossible to obtain comparable and effective reference objects in the market, so the market approach cannot be adopted in the valuation. In addition, there are no development projects under construction at present, and it is uncertain whether new land parcels can be obtained for projects in the future. Based on the above, the management of the company cannot make accurate and reasonable prediction of future income, so the income approach cannot be adopted in the valuation.
For Jinzhong Xiya, the physical conditions, title ownership, etc. of various assets and liabilities can be investigated and identified, which meets the basic conditions of using the asset-based approach for valuation. Therefore, the asset-based approach is adopted for the overall valuation, and the appraised value is determined based on the value of the entire equity interests of the shareholders after valuation multiplied by the shareholding ratio. The calculation formula is as follows:
Appraised value of long-term equity investment = value of the entire equity interests of the shareholders of the investee unit × shareholding ratio
The valuation of subsidiaries using the asset-based approach is similar to that of parent company, and will not be explained separately.
– 141 –
SUMMARY OF BUSINESS VALUATION REPORT
APPENDIX II
3.3 Fixed assets
The gross value, net value and appraised value of equipment (including vehicles, electronic equipment and office equipment) are summarised in the table below:
Unit: RMB
| Name Vehicles Electronic equipment Office equipment Total |
Book Gross value 789,981.54 418,843.04 210,564.04 1,419,388.62 |
value Net value 33,419.73 14,389.93 7,152.43 54,962.09 |
Appraised value Gross value Net value 728,400.00 319,527.00 327,708.09 58,069.00 172,208.14 27,612.50 1,228,316.23 405,208.50 |
Appreciation amount Gross value Net value -61,581.54 286,107.27 -91,134.95 43,679.07 -38,355.90 20,460.07 -191,072.39 350,246.41 |
Appreciation amount Gross value Net value -61,581.54 286,107.27 -91,134.95 43,679.07 -38,355.90 20,460.07 -191,072.39 350,246.41 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 350,246.41 |
The main reasons for the appreciation or depreciation of appraised value of equipment (including vehicles, electronic equipment and office equipment) are as follows:
-
The valuation of replacement costs varied with the fluctuations in market prices and price index that had valuation impact on replacement costs;
-
The appraised assets’ net value were higher than their net book value as a result of the change in newness rates caused by the difference between the accounting depreciation life adopted by the valued entity and the economic life adopted in the valuation.
The key quantified input values and assumptions used in the calculation of appraised values and the calculation process are as follows:
3.3.1. Vehicles
- 3.3.1.1 For vehicles that are actively traded in the market, the market approach is adopted for valuation
Market approach for valuation of vehicles refers to the valuation approach that determines the value of an appraised vehicle by comparing the similarities and differences between the appraised vehicle and similar vehicles recently sold and make adjustment according to the market price of similar vehicles.
– 142 –
SUMMARY OF BUSINESS VALUATION REPORT
APPENDIX II
In valuation, the appraisers obtain the second-hand vehicle trading prices of second-hand vehicles through the second-hand vehicles trading market. Upon analysis and comparison and removal of unreasonable factors, the appraised value of the vehicle is then determined after adjustment according to the differences between the appraised vehicle and the traded vehicles after.
Market approach is an approach to estimate the value of the assets subject to valuation by selecting the recent trading prices of the assets which are the same or similar to those subject to valuation for comparison with the assets subject to valuation. The basic formula is as follows:
Appraised value of vehicle under market approach = reference trading price × trading condition correction coefficient × trading time correction coefficient × individual factor correction coefficient
The factor correction coefficient is to correct the differences between the assets subject to valuation and the reference object, so as to correct the price level under the conditions of the reference object to the price level under the conditions of the assets subject to valuation. The factors that need to be corrected are generally in four aspects, namely trading condition, trading time, trading place, and individual factors.
- 3.3.1.2 For vehicles that are not actively traded in the market, the cost approach is adopted for valuation.
Computational formula: appraised value = replacement cost × comprehensive newness rate
1 Determination of replacement cost
Replacement cost = vehicle purchase price (tax inclusive) + vehicle purchase tax + other expenses — deductible VAT
- A. Determination of vehicle purchase price (tax inclusive)
The vehicle purchase price is determined by comparison and analysis after inquiry with local dealers.
- B. Determination of vehicle purchase tax
It is calculated by multiplying the price of the vehicle excluding tax by a 10% tax rate.
– 143 –
SUMMARY OF BUSINESS VALUATION REPORT
APPENDIX II
- C. Determination of other expenses
According to the relevant provisions of the state on the management of motor vehicles, vehicles must go through the registration procedures, and the expenses are incurred by vehicle registration, vehicle qualification inspection, pollutant discharge qualification inspection, and new vehicle charge, etc.
- D Determination of deductible VAT
For equipment eligible for VAT deduction, the deductible VAT is calculated.
Deductible VAT = Purchase price including tax/(1+13%) × 13%
2 Determination of comprehensive newness rate
- A. Service life method
Newness rate under service life method = remaining service life/(used service life+ remaining service life) × 100%, or;
newness rate under service life method = (total service life — used service life)/total service life × 100%
- B. Mileage method
Newness rate = (specified mileage — travelled mileage)/specified mileage × 100%
- C. Observation and analysis method
During the on-site work phase, appraisers will conduct comprehensive analysis of major indicators including vehicle engine performance; operation of each system of the vehicle chassis; conditions of vehicle body; use of electrical equipment of vehicle; repair and maintenance of vehicle; overhaul and technical improvement of vehicle; original build quality of vehicle; exterior and integrity of vehicle, etc. through observation, survey and listening to the opinions of relevant technical personnel.
– 144 –
SUMMARY OF BUSINESS VALUATION REPORT
APPENDIX II
- D. Comprehensive newness rate
In the vehicle valuation, the method of whichever is lower is used to determine the newness rate, i.e., the lower of the newness rate determined by the service life method and the newness rate determined by the mileage method. Meanwhile, according to the on-site observation and analysis factors of the appraisers, the final comprehensive newness rate is determined with the weighted value of the abovementioned lowest newness rate and newness rate under the observation and analysis method.
The computational formula of the comprehensive newness rate is as follows:
Comprehensive newness rate = newness rate under service life method (newness rate under the mileage method) × 40% +newness rate under observation and analysis method × 60%
3 Determination of appraised value
Appraised value = replacement cost × comprehensive newness rate
4. Valuation example
Taking Jin K02203 Tiantan small ordinary passenger car as an example:
- (1) Overview of the vehicle:
Table of Information on Jin K02203 Tiantan Small Ordinary Passenger Car
| Motor vehicle owner | Jinzhong Development Zone | Jinzhong Development Zone | Jinzhong Development Zone | Vehicle license plate | Jin K02203 | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Real Estate Development | ||||||||||
| Co., Ltd. | ||||||||||
| Vehicle brand | Tiantan | Exterior color | White/yellow | |||||||
| Vehicle model | 8F5032XSW | VIN | JTFSX23P2H6184530 | |||||||
| Nature of use | Non-operating | Engine No. | 2TR9138120 | |||||||
| Displacement / power | 2,694ml/113kw | Vehicle manufacturing | 2018.1.31 | |||||||
| date | ||||||||||
| Name of manufacturer Beijing Tiantan Haiqiao Bus |
Date of issue | 2018.3.29 | ||||||||
| Co., Ltd. |
– 145 –
SUMMARY OF BUSINESS VALUATION REPORT
APPENDIX II
| Domestic / Imported Imported refitted vehicle Approved passenger load 9 people Annual survey Valid until March 2024 Fuel type Gasoline |
|
|---|---|
The on-site inspection showed that the vehicle parked outside the yard of the business premises of the valuation object. The exterior of the vehicle has good gloss and is slightly faded; the lights are complete, and the front and rear bumpers are complete; the vehicle’s technical conditions are good and the vehicle can operate normally; the overall body is white and the tires are worn; the interior of the vehicle is complete and the leather seats have slight wear; the instrument panel and indicator lights display normally. As of the appraisal reference date, the odometer showed 21,920 km; the chassis, steering system, braking system, gearbox, front axle and rear axle are in good conditions; the power system and the engine igniter work normally; the cleanliness of the interior decoration is general, and the air conditioning system and sound system work normally.
(2) Valuation Approach
According to market survey, the market transaction volume of the vehicle as the valuation object is small. Therefore, the cost approach is used to calculate the value of the valuation object.
① Replacement cost
The appraisers have learned from the staff of the 4S store that the valuation object is a 2017 model vehicle which is no longer for sale. For the 2022 new model vehicle, the guide price is RMB618,000, the purchase tax is RMB54,690.27, the local motor vehicle license plate fee and other fees based on market research are about RMB500, and the VAT deductible is RMB71,097.35. Therefore, the replacement value is determined as:
Replacement cost = vehicle purchase price (inclusive of tax) + vehicle purchase tax + other expenses – VAT deductible
= 618,000 + 54,690.27 + 500 - 71,097.35
- ≈ 602,100 (RMB)
– 146 –
SUMMARY OF BUSINESS VALUATION REPORT
APPENDIX II
② Determination of comprehensive newness rate:
The comprehensive newness rate is calculated under the comprehensive analysis method. The comprehensive analysis method is to determine the newness rate of a used vehicle based on the useful life (or mileage) while taking into account the impact of various factors such as the actual technical conditions, maintenance conditions and use conditions of the used vehicle.
A. Newness rate under service life method
The valuation object was registered in March 2018. The newness rate of the vehicle under service life method, if calculated based on the economic useful life of 15 years, was 63% as of the appraisal reference date.
B. Newness rate under the mileage method
The mileage of the valuation object was 21,920 km, and the mileage depreciation rate is 96% based on the prescribed mileage of 60,000 km.
The comprehensive newness rate of 63% is selected based on the newness rate under these two methods, whichever is smaller.
C. Newness rate under observation and analysis method
As the valuation object was purchased earlier, some of the parts and components technology and configuration were behind the new model. The new model has changed and improved as compared with valuation object in many aspects, such as the number of gearbox gears, overall body size, weight, maximum horsepower, power and internal configurations. Taking into account the actual use and the gap with new models, the appraisers determined that the newness rate under observation and analysis method is 30%.
– 147 –
SUMMARY OF BUSINESS VALUATION REPORT
APPENDIX II
- D. Determination of comprehensive newness rate
In summary, the comprehensive newness rate is determined to be
Comprehensive newness rate = newness rate under service life method × 40%
+ newness rate under observation and analysis method × 60%
= 63% × 40% + 30% × 60%
= 57%
(3) Determination of appraised value
According to the formula:
Appraised value = replacement value×comprehensive newness rate
= 602,100 × 43%
= 258,903 (RMB)
3.3.2. Equipment
The basic approaches of asset valuation include market approach, income approach and cost approach. The equipment as valuation object is not an asset portfolio and does not have independent profitability, and thus the income approach is not applicable to the valuation.
Based on the characteristics of all kinds of equipment, type of appraised value, data collection and other relevant conditions, the cost approach is mainly used for valuation; for used equipment and abandoned equipment with price available in the second-hand market, the second-hand price is used for valuation.
Cost approach: It is an approach in which the difference between the full cost of reacquiring or constructing an appraised asset in a new status under current conditions, less the physical depreciation, functional depreciation and economic depreciation already incurred by the appraised asset, is used as the appraised value of the appraised asset, which will be used to determine the value of the valuation object.
– 148 –
SUMMARY OF BUSINESS VALUATION REPORT
APPENDIX II
3.3.2.1 Determination of full replacement price
The full replacement price is composed of the current market purchase price, transportation and miscellaneous costs, installation and commissioning costs, etc. (for general VAT taxpayers, the equipment that meets the VAT deduction conditions, the full replacement price of the equipment does not include the corresponding VAT). The assets under the valuation are all office equipment and electronic equipment, and the upfront cost and capital cost of the equipment are not considered.
Full replacement price = market purchase price+transportation and miscellaneous costs+ installation and commissioning costs — deductible VAT
-
A. Where the market purchase price of the domestic equipment can be found on the appraisal reference date, the full replacement price of the equipment shall be determined with the reasonable purchase price in the domestic market plus transportation and miscellaneous costs and installation and commissioning costs. The transportation and miscellaneous costs of equipment subject to free home delivery by suppliers are zero. For equipment that does not require installation or commissioning or whose purchase price already includes installation and commissioning costs, the installation and commissioning rate is zero.
-
B For the equipment that has no current price available for inquiry, it is modified based on its performance, characteristics and technical parameters as compared with similar products and the full replacement price is determined by analogy.
-
C. The valuation is based on the characteristics of the equipment subject to valuation. The purchase price of the equipment includes the necessary transportation and miscellaneous costs and installation and commissioning costs, and the transportation and miscellaneous costs and installation and commissioning costs are not considered separately.
3.3.2.2 Determination of newness rate
The service life method and field investigation method are used to determine the comprehensive newness rate of electronic equipment, and the service life method calculates the service life newness rate through the used service life and economic service life (economic life). The field investigation method determines the newness rate through the field investigation of the running conditions, the maintenance and the environment of the machinery and equipment.
– 149 –
SUMMARY OF BUSINESS VALUATION REPORT
APPENDIX II
- A. The computational formula of newness rate under the service life method is as follows:
Newness rate under service life = (economic service life — used service life)/economic service life × 100%
- B. Newness rate under field investigation method
The appraisers conduct a comprehensive analysis of the main technical indicators of the machinery and equipment through field investigation and listening to the opinions of equipment managers and technicians, including:
-
a Current technical status of the equipment;
-
b Actual time in use of equipment;
-
c Normal load rate of equipment;
-
d Original manufacturing quality of equipment;
-
e Repair and maintenance of equipment;
-
f Overhaul and technical improvement of equipment;
-
g Working environment and conditions of equipment;
-
h Appearance and integrity of equipment.
– 150 –
SUMMARY OF BUSINESS VALUATION REPORT
APPENDIX II
After a detailed understanding of the above, the standards of newness rate of machinery and equipment are determined and the graded newness rates are used as the standard basis for determining the newness rate, as detailed in the following table:
Reference Table for Valuation of Newness Rate under Field Investigation Method
| Newness rate | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Grade | Newness | Description | % |
| l | New equipment | New equipment or equipment not used for a | 100-90 |
| long time. After test acceptance, the quality is | |||
| up to standard. Equipment that can guarantee | |||
| the normal operation with the original design | |||
| performance | |||
| 2 | Relatively new | Equipment that has not been used for a long | 89-65 |
| equipment | time, with relatively new appearance, stable | ||
| performance and good operation conditions, | |||
| and can meet the design requirements, | |||
| without major fault | |||
| 3 | Half new | Equipment that has been used for a long | 64-40 |
| equipment | time, with old appearance and relatively good | ||
| operation conditions, can basically meet the | |||
| equipment design requirements and process | |||
| requirements and requires regular | |||
| maintenance to ensure normal use | |||
| 4 | Old or relatively | Equipment that has been used for a long time | 39-15 |
| old equipment | or undergone several overhauls, can still be | ||
| used at present in general conditions, with | |||
| significantly reduced performance and more | |||
| faults in operation, and can still meet the | |||
| process requirements after maintenance and | |||
| be used safely. |
– 151 –
SUMMARY OF BUSINESS VALUATION REPORT
APPENDIX II
- C. The computational formula of the comprehensive newness rate is as follows:
Comprehensive newness rate = newness rate under the service life method × 40%+ newness rate under field investigation method × 60%
3.3.2.3 Determination of appraised value
Computational formula: appraised value = replacement cost × comprehensive newness rate
3.3.2.4 Appraisal of second-hand price
For the updated electronic equipment, obsolete equipment and discarded equipment, the second-hand price is appraised based on the price in the second-hand market or the scrap price on the appraisal reference date.
3.3.2.5 Valuation example
Fixed Assets – Breakdown of Electronic Equipment Valuation Report No. 25
Name of equipment: color printer
Model: Epson L850
Time of purchase: October 2017
Time of service commencement: 17 October 2017
Quantity: 1
Gross carrying value: RMB3,600
Net carrying value: RMB108
(1) Valuation process
The appraisers, together with the personnel of the relevant department of the title owner, conducted on-site inspection of the equipment. The equipment was stored in the finance office, and the actual manufacturer and model specifications of the equipment were consistent with the declaration documents. According to on-site verification, the equipment use environment and use conditions were good.
– 152 –
SUMMARY OF BUSINESS VALUATION REPORT
APPENDIX II
- (2) Valuation approach
Based on review of the original vouchers of the enterprise and price inquiry in the market, the tax-inclusive sales price of equipment was RMB3,018 per set (including transportation cost) as of the appraisal reference date. According to the Handbook of Common Methods and Parameters for Asset Valuation, the economic useful life of the equipment is 8 years.
After checking the equipment conditions on the spot and talking with the operators and technicians, the appraisers understood that the equipment had not undergone overhaul since it was put into use in October 2017. As it has been purchased for a long time, the state of use is general and the performance can basically meet the requirements of daily use, and it can be used safely and is 30% new.
The valuation and calculation process is as follows:
Unit: RMB
| No. | Item | Calculation process | Calculation process | Calculation process | Result | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (1) | Unit purchase | Market price inquiry | 3,018.00 | ||||||||||
| price | |||||||||||||
| (2) | Deductible VAT | (1) × 13% ÷ (1 + 13%) | 347.20 | ||||||||||
| (3) | Replacement | (1) – (2) | 2,670.80 | ||||||||||
| unit price | |||||||||||||
| (4) | Full | (3) × Quantity | 2,670.80 | ||||||||||
| replacement | |||||||||||||
| price | |||||||||||||
| (5) | Economic | Handbook of Common Methods and Parameters | for Asset Valuation | 8 | |||||||||
| useful life | |||||||||||||
| (6) | Useful life | Reference date – date of service | commencement | 5.96 | |||||||||
| (7) | Remaining | (5) – (6) | 2.04 | ||||||||||
| useful life | |||||||||||||
| (8) | Newness rate | Weight | 1 | 40% | (7) ÷ (5) × 100% | 26% | |||||||
| under service | |||||||||||||
| life method |
– 153 –
SUMMARY OF BUSINESS VALUATION REPORT
APPENDIX II
| No. | Item | Calculation process | Calculation process | Calculation process | Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (9) | Newness rate | Weight | 2 | 60% | Determination on basis 30% |
|||||||||
| under | of | on-site investigation | ||||||||||||
| observation | ||||||||||||||
| method | ||||||||||||||
| (10) | Comprehensive | (8) × Weight 1 + (9) × Weight 2 | 28% | |||||||||||
| newness rate | ||||||||||||||
| (11) | Appraised value | (4) × (10) | 748 |
3.4 Current liabilities
3.4.1 Accounts payable
The carrying value of the accounts payable as at appraisal reference date was RMB59,922,540.51. The accounting contents are the payable design fees, engineering payments, payments for materials, installation fees, surveying and mapping fees, supervision fees, water rate, natural gas fee, labor costs, etc. This valuation was to verify the authenticity and completeness of the payables by verifying the original vouchers and relevant contracts of each payment, and then to determine the appraised value based on the verified carrying amount.
The appraised value of accounts payable amounts was RMB59,922,540.51.
3.4.2 Advances from customers
The carrying value of advances from customers as at the appraisal reference date was RMB732,954,726.26. The accounting contents are the payments for purchase of housings received in advance by the valued entity. This valuation is to verify the authenticity and completeness of advances from customers by verifying the original vouchers and relevant contracts of each payment, and then to determine the appraised value based on the verified carrying amount.
The appraised value of advances from customers was RMB732,954,726.26.
– 154 –
SUMMARY OF BUSINESS VALUATION REPORT
APPENDIX II
3.4.3 Taxes payable
The carrying value of taxes payable as at the appraisal reference date was RMB41,549,800.25. The accounting items are various taxes and fees payable by the valued entity. This valuation is to examine the accounting, provision and payment of various taxes in accordance with the provisions of national tax laws and regulations, and then to determine the appraised value of the estimated tax based on the verified amount.
The appraised value of taxes payable was RMB41,549,800.25.
3.4.4 Other payables
The appraised value of other payables as at the appraisal reference date was RMB2,110,716,939.32, of which the amount of the dividend payable was RMB71,965,200.00. The accounting contents are all payables of the valued entity other than accounts payable, advances from customers and taxes payable. This valuation is to verify the authenticity and completeness of other payables by verifying the original vouchers and relevant contracts of each payment, and then to determine the appraised value based on the verified carrying value. The appraised value of other payables was RMB2,110,716,939.32, of which the appraised value of dividends payable was RMB71,965,200.00.
3.5 Non-current liabilities
Non-current liabilities include long-term borrowings and special payables.
The appraised value of long term borrowings as at the appraisal reference date was RMB178,000,000.00. The accounting contents include the borrowings of the valued entity with Jinzhong Development Zone Rural and Commercial Bank Co., Ltd. This valuation is to verify the authenticity and completeness of other payables by verifying the original vouchers and relevant contracts of each payment, and then to determine the appraised value based on the verified carrying value.
The appraised value of long term borrowings was RMB178,000,000.00.
The carrying value of the special payables as at the appraisal reference date was RMB142,491,223.22, which was a non-proprietary item, and the appraised value was presented at the carrying value.
– 155 –
SUMMARY OF BUSINESS VALUATION REPORT
APPENDIX II
4. VALUATION ASSUMPTIONS
The following valuation assumptions were used by the Business Valuer in this valuation:
4.1 Basic assumptions
-
The open market assumption is to assume that the parties to the transaction of the assets traded in the market, or the assets to be traded in the market, have equal status and each has the opportunity and time to obtain sufficient market information in order to facilitate the reasonable judgement on the function, use and transaction prices, etc. of the assets. The open market assumption is based on the fact that assets can be traded publicly in the market.
-
The transaction assumption is to assume that all assets to be valued are already in the process of transaction, and the appraisers conduct the valuation based on the simulated market such as the transaction conditions for the assets to be valued. The transaction assumption is the most basic assumption for the valuation to be conducted.
-
The assumption of continued use of assets is to assume the continued use of the valuation subject in place according to its current use and intended use methods, scale, frequency, circumstance, etc.
-
The assumption of the external environment of valuation is to assume that there will be no major changes in the relevant prevailing national laws, regulations, and policies; there will be no major changes in the social and economic environment where the valued entity is located; and there will be no major impacts of other force majeure factors.
-
Assumption of valuation subject
It is assumed that the purchase, acquisition, and construction processes of the assets involved in the valuation subject are in compliance with relevant national laws and regulations, and that the existence of the appraised value of the assets subject to valuation presupposes that they have been acquired in a legal manner and protected by relevant laws.
It is assumed that the physical assets involved in the valuation subject have no major technical failures that affect their continued use, and that its key components and materials have no potential major quality defects.
– 156 –
SUMMARY OF BUSINESS VALUATION REPORT
APPENDIX II
The Valuation Report is based on the assumption that the valuation subject is not subject to any other rights (including mortgage rights, lease rights, liens, etc.) and has no co-owners.
- Assumption of authenticity of collected information
The Valuation Report is based on the authenticity and legality of the information related to the valuation provided by the principal and the valued entity, and is used as one of the important basis for the valuation. If the information provided by the principal or the valued entity is incorrect, all responsibilities shall be borne by the principal or the valued entity.
- The value estimation under the Valuation Report is made on the premise that all significant or potential factors which may affect the valuation analysis have been fully disclosed between the appraisal agency, the principal and the valued entity.
4.2 General assumptions
-
There are no expected major changes in the relevant national laws, regulations and policies for the industry in which the valued entity is located;
-
Except for changes known to the public, there are no other expected major changes in the socio-economic environment and economic development;
-
Changes in the current national bank credit interest rates and foreign exchange rates can be maintained within a reasonable range;
-
Except for changes known to the public, there are no changes in the current national tax system;
-
There is no major adverse impact from other force majeure and unpredictable factors;
-
There will be no significant changes in the accounting policies and accounting methods of the valued entity in the future.
4.3 Special assumptions
- With regard to the legal description or legal issues of the appraised assets under the Valuation Report (including their ownership or encumbrance limitations), we will conduct a general investigation in accordance with the requirements of the standards.
– 157 –
APPENDIX II
SUMMARY OF BUSINESS VALUATION REPORT
Apart from those disclosed in the work report, the ownership of the appraised assets is assumed to be in good condition and tradable in the market, not subject to any lien and easement, have not been violated and bearing no other encumbrances.
-
We have conducted independent review of the information provided by the principal and other parties upon which the conclusion, in whole or in part, relating to the appraised value set out in the Valuation Report pursuant to the valuation procedures. We make no representation as to the authenticity and accuracy of such information.
-
It is assumed that all certificates, licenses, letters of consent or other legal or administrative authorization documents signed or issued by relevant local and national governmental institutions, private organisations or groups, which are required by the users and have been taken into account in deriving the valuation set out in the Valuation Report, have been or could be obtained or updated at any time.
-
The valuation is made based on the purchasing power of the local currency on the appraisal reference date.
-
Estimations made in the Valuation Report are based on the assumption that all significant or potential factors which may affect the valuation analysis have been fully disclosed between us and the valued entity.
In case of changes in the above valuation assumptions, the valuation results will generally become invalid.
5. SPECIAL NOTES
The following matters cannot be assessed and estimated by the Business Valuer based on their professional level and ability, but they may indeed affect the appraisal conclusion, so the users of this Business Valuation Report should pay special attention to them:
(I) Use of expert work and relevant reports
The balance sheet in this Business Valuation Report is based on the audited value in the “Jin Hua Yi Cai Shen [2023] No. 0262” (Consolidated) Audit Report of Jinzhong Development Zone Real Estate Development Co., Ltd. issued by Shanxi Huayi Accounting Firm Co., Ltd.
– 158 –
SUMMARY OF BUSINESS VALUATION REPORT
APPENDIX II
- (II) Issues regarding the identification of the scope of assets of Jinzhong Development for valuation purpose
According to the information provided by the principal and the balance sheet of the Company, Jinzhong Development Zone has constructed three projects from its establishment to the appraisal reference date:
-
(1) Self-operated project (自營項目): i.e. “Phase I of Yijun Community” (頤郡小區一期) project subject to audit and valuation as involved in the economic behaviour;
-
(2) Entrusted construction projects (代建項目): the project names are “Longtian Urbanization Construction Project” (龍田城鎮化建設項目) (“ Longtian Project ”) and “Affordable Housing Community Project” (保障性安居小區工程項目) (“ Affordable Housing Project ”), respectively. Based on a joint explanatory memorandum (聯合說明 文件) entered into in June 2023 between the Vendor, the ManagementCommittee of Jinzhong Economic and Technological Development Zone and Jinzhong Development, it is confirmed that Longtian Project and Affordable Housing Project are both construction projects entrusted to Jinzhong Development by the Management Committee of Jinzhong Economic and Technological Development Zone. Accordingly, the entrusted construction projects belong to the Management Committee of Jinzhong Economic and Technological Development Zone in essence, they are not in under control of Jinzhong Development, and the relevant assets and income generated do not fall in the scope of equity interest for valuation purpose, so the projects are not in the scope of the valuation.
-
(III) Valuation treatment for the entrusted construction projects which are not in the scope of valuation but are contained in the audit statements
Since the capital investment in the entrusted construction projects is a special financial fund, accounting is only carried out in Jinzhong Development, and the equalization of assets and liabilities has no impact on the shareholders’ equity.
– 159 –
SUMMARY OF BUSINESS VALUATION REPORT
APPENDIX II
-
(IV) The appraisal agency and appraisers disclaim any responsibility for those defects that may affect the valuation of the assets but are not explained specifically in engagement, and are unknown to the appraisers after implementing appraisal procedures.
-
(V) This Business Valuation Report is compiled based on the economic behaviour documents, business licences, property right certificates, financial statements, accounting vouchers, asset ledger and other relevant information concerning this appraisal and supplied by the principal and the valued entity. The principal and the valued entity are responsible for the authenticity, validity and integrity of the original data supplied in relation to the abovementioned appraisal. The Company has independently examined the relevant economic behaviour documents, business licenses, property rights certificates, accounting vouchers and other information provided by the principal and the valued entity, but is not responsible for the authenticity of the above information.
-
(VI) The result of this valuation reflects the current value of the valuation subject for the purpose of this valuation and on an open market basis. This report takes no account of the impact of special additional costs that may be contributed by the parties on the appraised value, and without taking into account of the changes in the state’s macroeconomic policies, as well as acts of nature and other force majeure on the value of the assets.
-
(VII) We have not considered some factors that may affect the valuation, such as the expenses and taxes assumed for disposal of the assets subject to valuation, and we have not considered any tax as may be levied in respect of the revaluation gain and loss of asset value in each category of assets.
-
(VIII) We have not considered the impact to the valuation conclusions arising from any limiting factors such as the guarantee and pledge of appraised asset reported herein.
– 160 –
SUMMARY OF BUSINESS VALUATION REPORT
APPENDIX II
(IX) Title Ownership Information
-
The land and buildings included in the scope of the valuation have all been granted relevant and available title certificates. We assume that there is no property rights dispute over the valuation object, and the principal and the valued entity are responsible for the authenticity of the ownership information of the valuation object. Users of the report should note that our appraisers do not assume responsibility for disputes arising from the defects in the ownership.
-
For the developed remaining land, the undeveloped area under the State-owned Land Use Certificate (Jin Kai Guo Yong (2016) No. 0207004) shall be based on the Schematic Diagram of the Remaining Land Area of Plot 18-02 of Phase I of Yijun Community (頤 郡小區一期) project issued by Jinzhong Development Zone Survey, Mapping and Design Service Co., Ltd. as provided by the principal, and the principal is responsible for the accuracy of the information. Users of the report should note that we and the appraisers do not assume the corresponding responsibility for disputes arising from the information.
(X) Limitation of the appraisal procedures
-
The assets and liabilities for which the self-owned projects and entrusted construction projects cannot be stripped are presented at the audited carrying amount in the valuation.
-
The technical specifications or parameters of the assets within the scope of the valuation were provided by the valued entity. For the assets declared for valuation, the appraisers carried out on-site verification as far as possible. If the assets cannot be counted for reasons such as the use and placement of the assets, the valuation shall be based on the on-site investigation.
(XI) Incomplete valuation information
There is no evidence of incomplete information in the valuation.
– 161 –
SUMMARY OF BUSINESS VALUATION REPORT
APPENDIX II
-
(XII) The valuation conclusion is the result obtained through estimation based on the relevant information provided by the valued entity. The information provider shall be responsible for the authenticity, objectivity and integrity of the information. If the rationality of the analysis results is affected due to the authenticity of the information or if the enterprise transfers or hides assets or has other behaviours affecting the analysis results, we shall assume no responsibility therefor.
-
(XIII)Events in the period from the appraisal reference date to the date of the valuation report that may have an impact on the conclusion of valuation
-
On 13 November 2023, Jinzhong Development signed a parking space offset agreement with Shanxi Yufa Hongye Building Materials Co., Ltd., pursuant to which the company shall offset the project payment of RMB501,967.94 owing to Shanxi Yufa Hongye Building Materials Co., Ltd., with 7 underground flat parking spaces of the Phase I of Yijun Community (頤郡小區一期) project.
-
In November 2023, Jinzhong Development and Shanxi Zhongwang Media Co., Ltd. signed an agreement on offset with the parking space of Phase I of Yijun Community (頤郡小區一期) project, pursuant to which the company shall offset the advertising and publicity payment owing to Shanxi Zhongwang Media Co., Ltd. of RMB100,000.00 with an underground flat parking space and an underground storage room of Phase I of Yijun Community (頤郡小區一期) project.
-
(XIV) Defects in the economic behaviour corresponding to the assets valuation that may have a significant impact on the conclusion of valuation
-
When there is a change in the quantity of assets, the amount of assets should be adjusted accordingly, according to the original valuation method;
-
When there is a change in the asset price standard which has an obvious impact on the appraised value, the principal shall promptly engage a qualified valuation agency to re-determine the appraised value;
-
This valuation conclusion just reflects the prevailing price determined under the open market principle for the valuation purpose, without considering the pledge and guarantee undertaken or the impact on asset price due to changes in national macroeconomic policies, or the occurrence of a natural disaster and other force majeure causes. In case of change of foregoing conditions, the valuation conclusion generally becomes invalid.
– 162 –
SUMMARY OF BUSINESS VALUATION REPORT
APPENDIX II
-
The valuation is concluded based on the foregoing principles, basis, premise, methods and procedures and the valuation conclusion is only effective with the foregoing principles, basis and premise.
-
For other defects that may exist in the valuation and affect the valuation results, if the enterprise does not make a special explanation and the appraisers are unable to get aware of the same based on their professional experience, the appraisal agency and the appraisers shall not bear the relevant responsibilities therefor.
-
(XV) It is the responsibility of the registered asset appraiser to estimate the value of the valuation object and express professional opinions in accordance with relevant laws, regulations and assets valuation standards; it is the responsibility of the principal and relevant parties involved to provide the necessary information and ensure the authenticity, legality and completeness of the information provided and the proper use of the valuation report; the valuation conclusion shall not be regarded as the price guarantee for the realization of the valuation purpose, and the asset appraisers do not assume responsibility for the decision of the relevant parties.
(XVI) Explanation on land idle due to high voltage lines
In the inventories of the valuation object, except for the grant contract in relation to the land parcel GK2015-38 signed on 17 May 2016, and the supplementary contract in relation to the right to use state-owned construction land signed on 29 August 2022, as of the appraisal reference date, the development had not started for the remaining three land parcels (the grant contracts were signed for the land parcels GK2015-36 and GK2015-36 on 17 May 2016 and a grant contract was signed for the land parcel GK2016-29 on 27 February 2018), and the relevant expenses caused by idle land were considered in the valuation.
(XVII) Other matters to be noted
-
The report conclusion is drawn based on the bases, assumptions, methods and procedures of appraisal. Therefore, the conclusion shall be effective only when the bases, assumptions, methods and procedures of appraisal remain unchanged.
-
The issued valuation report and the valuation conclusion disclosed therein are limited to the valuation purpose as stated in the valuation report only, and are effective for use during the effective period of the valuation conclusion. We are not responsible for any consequences arising from any misuse thereof.
– 163 –
SUMMARY OF BUSINESS VALUATION REPORT
APPENDIX II
Users of the valuation reports should pay attention to the impact of the above special matters on the valuation conclusion.
6. DATE OF BUSINESS VALUATION REPORT
The date of the Business Valuation Report is 21 December 2023. The conclusion of this report is valid for one year from the appraisal reference date, i.e. from 30 September 2023 to 29 September 2024.
7. VALUATION REPORT OF JINZHONG XIYA
7.1 Description of Valuation Objects and Valuation Scope
7.1.1 Distribution and Characteristics of Main Assets
The main assets include current assets and fixed assets.
Current assets include monetary funds, accounts receivable, prepayments, other receivables, inventories and other current assets
Inventories mainly consist of product development.
Product development mainly includes 2 unsold or returned residential commodity apartments, 1 shop and 337 underground parking spaces in the “Agile • Xiyuan” community that have been developed and completed by Jinzhong Xiya.
– 164 –
APPENDIX II
SUMMARY OF BUSINESS VALUATION REPORT
The “Agile • Xiyuan” community project is located at No. 306, Huitong North Road, Yuci District, Jinzhong City. The land uses are urban residential land and other commercial land, with a total land area of 20,568.76m[2] (30.85 Mu). The sales as of the appraisal reference date are as shown in the following table:
Sales of Agile • Xiyuan Community
Unit: m[2]
| **Total available for ** | **Total available for ** | **Total available for ** | sale | sale | Sold | Remaining | Remaining | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Number of | Area available |
Number of | **Area ** | sold | Number of | Remaining | ||||||||||||
| housings | for sale | housings | housings | area | |||||||||||||||
| Ordinary residential housing 444 |
53,015 | 442 | 52,778.71 | 2 | 236.29 | ||||||||||||||
| Shop | 20 | 1,136.02 | 19 | 1,807 | 1 | 49.02 | |||||||||||||
| Underground parking spaces 410 |
73 | 337 | |||||||||||||||||
| (number) |
The remaining 2 unsold residential housings in the valuation have a total GFA of 236.29m[2] , and have been granted the real estate title certificates, with a carrying value of RMB1,269,159.98; one unsold shop has a GFA of 49.02m[2] and a carrying value of RMB391,130.29; 337 underground parking spaces have a carrying value of RMB19,359,847.01.
– 165 –
SUMMARY OF BUSINESS VALUATION REPORT
APPENDIX II
7.2 Technical Description of Valuation with Asset-based Approach
7.2.1 Technical Description of Valuation of Current Assets
7.2.1.1 Scope of valuation
Current assets included in the scope of valuation include: monetary funds, prepayments, other receivables, inventories and other current assets. The carrying value of the abovementioned current assets on the appraisal reference date is as shown in the following table:
Unit: RMB
| Item | Carrying value | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Monetary funds | 1,755,511.71 | ||||
| Accounts receivable | 26,747.00 | ||||
| Prepayments | 267,303.05 | ||||
| Other receivables | 166,329,672.31 | ||||
| Inventories | 21,020,137.28 | ||||
| Other current assets | 1,733,665.88 | ||||
| Total current assets | 191,133,037.23 |
7.2.1.2 Valuation verification process
-
Checking accounts: According to the valuation declaration detailed form of current assets provided by the valued unit, the appraisers first checked with the corresponding accounts of the valued unit’s balance sheet to make the total amount consistent; then checked with the valued unit’s detailed accounts of current assets and ledger to make the detailed amounts and contents consistent; and finally checked the original accounting vouchers for some current assets.
-
Data collection: In accordance with the principle of importance and the typical characteristics of various types of current assets, the appraisers collected bank statements and accounting vouchers as of the appraisal reference date, and conducted valuation procedures such as external confirmations.
– 166 –
SUMMARY OF BUSINESS VALUATION REPORT
APPENDIX II
-
On-site interview: The appraisers asked relevant personnel of the valued unit about important customer composition and credit status, collection of accounts receivable in historical years, and the policy on provision for bad debts, etc.
-
Valuation and estimation: Valuation and estimation were made on the basis of clear accounting verification, clear understanding of the situation, and collection of information required for valuation.
7.2.1.3 Valuation approach
The valuation approach in respect of the major assets of Jinzhong Xiya, being the inventories and other receivables, are as follows:
(A) Other receivables
The audited carrying value of other receivables as at the appraisal reference date is RMB166,329,672.31. The accounting contents include various other receivables and temporary payments of the valued unit except accounts receivable and prepayments.
During the inspection, the appraisers first checked whether the detailed accounts were consistent with the general ledger and statement balances as well as the asset valuation schedule, checked accounting records such as payment amount, occurrence time, business contents, etc., and analyzed the aging of the accounts. Secondly, based on the principle of importance, the amount test was conducted on accounts with large amounts and long aging to verify the authenticity and completeness of other receivables. On the basis of verification, the amount that may be recovered for each payment was determined. Based on the above, the appraised value was determined based on the carrying value.
The appraised value of other receivables is RMB166,329,672.31.
(B) Inventories — product development
The inventories included in the valuation scope are mainly product development, including unsold residential housings, shops and underground parking spaces, with a total carrying value of RMB21,020,137.28.
– 167 –
SUMMARY OF BUSINESS VALUATION REPORT
APPENDIX II
- Overview of product development
Product development mainly includes 2 unsold or returned residential commodity apartments, 1 shop and 337 underground parking spaces in the “Agile • Xiyuan” community that have been developed and completed by Jinzhong Xiya Real Estate Development Co., Ltd.
The “Agile •Xiyuan” community project is located at No. 306, Huitong North Road, Yuci District, Jinzhong City. The land uses are urban residential land and other commercial land, with a total land area of 20,568.76m[2] (30.85 Mu). The sales as of the appraisal reference date are as shown in the following table:
Sales of Agile • Xiyuan Community
Unit: m[2]
| **Total available for ** | **Total available for ** | **Total available for ** | sale | sale | Sold | Remaining | Remaining | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Number of | Area available |
for | Number of | Area | sold | Number of | Remaining | |||||||||||
| housings | sale | housings | housings | area | |||||||||||||||
| Ordinary residential housing 444 |
53,015 | 442 | 52,778.71 | 2 | 236.29 | ||||||||||||||
| Shop | 20 | 1,136.02 | 19 | 1,807 | 1 | 49.02 | |||||||||||||
| Underground parking spaces 410 |
73 | 337 | |||||||||||||||||
| (number) |
The remaining 2 unsold residential housings in the valuation have a total GFA of 236.29m[2] , and have been granted the real estate title certificates, with a carrying value of RMB1,269,159.98; one unsold shop has a GFA of 49.02m[2] and a carrying value of RMB391,130.29; 337 underground parking spaces have a carrying value of RMB19,359,847.01.
– 168 –
SUMMARY OF BUSINESS VALUATION REPORT
APPENDIX II
- Valuation process
The valuation was mainly carried out in the following stages:
- i. Review of asset valuation schedule
The appraisers listened to the introduction of the enterprise’s valuation scope, verified the title status, acquisition time, planned utilization conditions, development level and payment status of land price and project payment of the development project, and completed the valuation form on this basis.
ii. Collection of information
The appraisers collected various project development documents, land transfer contracts, “State-owned Land Use Certificate”, “Construction Project Planning Permit”, “Construction Project Construction Permit”, “Commercial Housing Sales Permit”, “Real Estate Title Certificate”, project completion filing confirmation or the “Table of Real Estate Area Calculation Results”, project contract ledger, sales ledger, and various historical data of the project and other relevant information used for registration of real estate ownership.
iii. Site survey
According to the valuation declaration form provided by the enterprise and with the cooperation of relevant personnel, the appraisers conducted survey and investigation on the project’s location, development level, investment, surrounding supporting facilities, sales and sales price of surrounding properties, and kept survey records. Based on the information provided by the enterprise, the appraisers confirmed the product development schedule within the scope of valuation, conducted inspection based on the confirmed product development schedule, and finally determined the scope of valuation according to the verified product development schedule.
iv. Valuation and calculation
Based on the on-site survey results, the appraisers conducted survey and analysis on the inventories — product development, determined various valuation elements, and used appropriate valuation methods based on the specific circumstances of the assets to calculate the appraised value of assets and prepared an asset valuation description.
– 169 –
SUMMARY OF BUSINESS VALUATION REPORT
APPENDIX II
-
Valuation approach
-
i. Valuation of residential housings
The major valuation approaches for real estate include market comparison approach (i.e. market approach), income approach, cost approach, and hypothetical development approach, etc. Following the principles of objectivity, independence and impartiality, the market approach is selected for the residential housings in accordance with the Code for Real Estate Appraisal (房地 產估價規範), the development condition of the local property market as well as the specific characteristics of the valuation object and the purpose of the valuation.
Market comparison approach is an approach to evaluate the value or price of a valuation object through processing the transaction price of comparable cases based on the differences between them after selecting a certain number of comparable cases for the valuation object.
- A. Valuation and calculation of Room 2403, 24/F, Building 1 of Agile Xiyuan
In the recent real estate market, we selected the existing real estate transactions which are highly correlated and replaceable with the valuation object, all with the same entitlement status and within the same parameters of supply and demand, with those factors affecting the real estate market, such as the locations, features, transaction dates and transaction status all taken into account while making our analysis, comparison and correction based on their actual circumstances, so as to arrive at a reasonable market price of the valuation object.
- (1) Selection of comparables
Through market research and inquiries with the competent authorities, we have chosen a non-exhaustive list of transaction subjects in accordance with the Asset Valuation Standards and Code for Real Estate Appraisal, that:
-
Comparables shall be selected from transaction instances and not less than three;
-
Comparables should be traded in a manner suitable for valuation purposes;
-
The real estate in comparables should be similar to the real estate in the valuation object;
-
The transaction date of the comparables should be close to the valuation date, and the time interval between the dates is not suitable to be more than one year and should not exceed two years;
– 170 –
SUMMARY OF BUSINESS VALUATION REPORT
APPENDIX II
-
The transaction price of the comparables should be the normal price or can be corrected to the normal price;
-
Under the same conditions, the transaction instances with location, transaction date and valuation date close to the valuation object should be selected as the comparables.
Based on the above provisions, we narrowed down the group of transaction subjects to the three comparables in line with our preset requirements, i.e. similar location (or in the same supply and demand circle), same entitlement status, same purpose, same transaction type and similar valuation date. In particular, the comparables selected are (1) of same purpose being residential housings; (2) situated within the scope of Yuci Economic Development Zone, Jinzhong City; (3) with reinforced concrete structure; (4) with good to average decoration condition, traffic conditions, environment, floor pattern and property management service; (5) complete infrastructure; (6) relatively complete public facilities; and (7) with transaction dates close to the appraisal reference date, i.e. 30 September 2023.
Details of the comparables are as follows:
Case A: A residential housing in Phase III of Xinxing Cultural and Education City, which is on the 2nd of the 12 floors, with a GFA of 218 m[2] , mixed structure, north-south orientation, decent decoration condition, completed and delivered in 2006, and sold at RMB6,453/m[2] in 2023;
-
Case B: A residential housing in Chenxing Yijun, which is on the 8th of the 10 floors, with a GFA of 104 m[2] , mixed structure, north-south orientation, decent decoration condition, completed and delivered in 2019, and sold at RMB7,212/m[2] in 2023;
-
Case C: A residential housing in Agile Xiyuan, which is on the 12th of the 24 floors, with a GFA of 104 m[2] , mixed structure, north-south orientation, average decoration condition, completed and delivered in 2020, and sold at RMB7,500/m[2] in 2023.
– 171 –
SUMMARY OF BUSINESS VALUATION REPORT
APPENDIX II
Table of comparative factors and conditions for comparables
| Cases | Valuation object | Valuation object | Case A | Case A | Case B | Case C | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Phase III of Xinxing | ||||||||||||||
| Cultural and | ||||||||||||||
| **Name ** | of Complex | Agile Xiyuan | Education | Chenxing Yijun | Agile Xiyuan | |||||||||
| City | ||||||||||||||
| Year of Transaction | — | 2023 | 2023 | 2023 | ||||||||||
| Transaction price (RMB/m2) |
— | 6,453 | 7,212 | 7,500 | ||||||||||
| Purpose | Residential | Residential | Residential | Residential | ||||||||||
| Structure | Reinforced concrete | Reinforced concrete | Reinforced concrete | Reinforced concrete | ||||||||||
| Area (m2) | 103.41 | 218 | 104 | 104 | ||||||||||
| Decoration condition | Decent | Average | Decent | Decent | ||||||||||
| Orientation | North and South | North and South | North and South | North and South | ||||||||||
| Floor | 24/24 | 2/12 | 8/10 | 12/24 | ||||||||||
| Year of completion | 2020 | 2006 | 2019 | 2020 | ||||||||||
| Traffic conditions | Good | Good | Good | Good | ||||||||||
| Environment | Good | Average | Good | Good | ||||||||||
| Infrastructure | Complete | Complete | Complete | Complete | ||||||||||
| Public facilities | Relatively complete | Relatively complete | Relatively complete | Relatively complete | ||||||||||
| Floor pattern | Good | Good | Good | Good | ||||||||||
| Property management | Good | Good | Good | Good | ||||||||||
| service |
(2) Correction of comparables
- ① Correction of transaction conditions
Comparables A, B and C are all normal market transactions, hence the correction coefficient for transaction conditions of 100/100 for all.
– 172 –
SUMMARY OF BUSINESS VALUATION REPORT
APPENDIX II
② Correction of transaction date
As the transaction dates of comparables A, B and C are close to the valuation date, and the prices of such type of properties are relatively stable within the same supply and demand circle, the correction coefficient for transaction date is 100/100 as well.
③ Equity adjustment
As the equity status of the valuation object is basically the same as that of comparables A, B, and C, the equity adjustment coefficients are 100/100.
④ Adjustment of location factors
Table of correction coefficients for location factors
| Comparables Comparative factors Traffic conditions Surrounding environment Public supporting facilities Infrastructure Floor Orientation Sub-total |
|
|---|---|
– 173 –
SUMMARY OF BUSINESS VALUATION REPORT
APPENDIX II
- ⑤ Adjustment of physical conditions
Table of physical conditions adjustment coefficients
| Comparables Comparative factors Decoration Year of completion GFA Floor pattern Property management service Sub-total |
|
|---|---|
- (3) Comparison correction
Table of comparison correction
| Correction | Correction | |||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Comparables | Unit price (RMB/m2) |
coefficient for transaction conditions |
coefficient for transaction date |
Adjustment coefficient for location factors |
Adjustment coefficient for physical factors |
Equity adjustment coefficient |
Unit price after correction (RMB/m2) |
Apprised unit price (RMB/m2) |
||||||||||||||||
| Case A | 6,453 | 100/100 | 100/100 | 100/96 | 100/88 | 100/100 | 7,638 | |||||||||||||||||
| Case B | 7,212 | 100/100 | 100/100 | 100/102 | 100/100 | 100/100 | 7,071 | 7,310 | ||||||||||||||||
| Case C | 7,500 | 100/100 | 100/100 | 100/104 | 100/100 | 100/100 | 7,212 |
-
Notes: ① Unit price after correction= transaction price of object of comparison × correction coefficient for transaction conditions × correction coefficient for transaction date × adjustment coefficient for location factors × adjustment coefficient for condition factors ×Equity adjustment coefficient;
-
② Appraised unit price is the arithmetic average of the three unit prices after correction, with the calculation results accurate to 2 decimal places.
-
(4) Determination of the value of the valuation object
Total value of real estate = Apprised unit price × GFA
- = 7,310×103.41 ≈ 755,927 (RMB)
– 174 –
SUMMARY OF BUSINESS VALUATION REPORT
APPENDIX II
- B. Valuation and calculation of Room 701, 7/F, Building 1 of Agile Xiyuan
In the recent real estate market, we selected the existing real estate transactions which are highly correlated and replaceable with the valuation object, all with the same entitlement status and within the same parameters of supply and demand, with those factors affecting the real estate market, such as the locations, features, transaction dates and transaction status all taken into account while making our analysis, comparison and correction based on their actual circumstances, so as to arrive at a reasonable market price of the valuation object.
(1) Selection of comparables
Through market research and inquiries with the competent authorities, we have chosen a non-exhaustive list of transaction subjects in accordance with the Asset Valuation Standards and Code for Real Estate Appraisal, that:
-
Comparables shall be selected from transaction instances and not less than three;
-
Comparables should be traded in a manner suitable for valuation purposes;
-
The real estate in comparables should be similar to the real estate in the valuation object;
-
The transaction date of the comparables should be close to the valuation date, and the time interval between the dates is not suitable to be more than one year and should not exceed two years;
-
The transaction price of the comparables should be the normal price or can be corrected to the normal price;
-
Under the same conditions, the transaction instances with location, transaction date and valuation date close to the valuation object should be selected as the comparables.
Based on the above provisions, we narrowed down the group of transaction subjects to the three comparables in line with our preset requirements, i.e. similar location (or in the same supply and demand circle), same entitlement status, same purpose, same transaction type and similar valuation date. In particular, the comparables selected are (1) of same purpose being residential housings; (2) situated within the scope of Yuci Economic Development Zone, Jinzhong City; (3) with reinforced concrete structure; (4) with good to average decoration condition, traffic conditions, environment, floor pattern and property management service; (5) complete infrastructure; (6) relatively complete public facilities; and (7) with transaction dates close to the appraisal reference date, i.e. 30 September 2023.
– 175 –
SUMMARY OF BUSINESS VALUATION REPORT
APPENDIX II
Details of the comparables are as follows:
-
Case A: A residential housing in Phase III of Xinxing Cultural and Education City, which is on the 2nd of the 12 floors, with a GFA of 218 m[2] , mixed structure, north-south orientation, decent decoration condition, completed and delivered in 2006, and sold at RMB6,453/m[2] in 2023;
-
Case B: A residential housing in Chenxing Yijun, which is on the 8th of the 10 floors, with a GFA of 104 m[2] , mixed structure, north-south orientation, decent decoration condition, completed and delivered in 2019, and sold at RMB7,212/m[2] in 2023;
-
Case C: A residential housing in Agile Xiyuan, which is on the 12th of the 24 floors, with a GFA of 104 m[2] , mixed structure, north-south orientation, average decoration condition, completed and delivered in 2020, and sold at RMB7,500/m[2] in 2023.
Table of comparative factors and conditions for comparables
| Cases | Cases | Valuation object | Valuation object | Case A | Case B | Case C | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Phase III of Xinxing | ||||||||||||
| Cultural and | ||||||||||||
| Name of Complex | Agile Xiyuan | Education | Chenxing Yijun | Agile Xiyuan | ||||||||
| City | ||||||||||||
| Year of Transaction | — | 2023 | 2023 | 2023 | ||||||||
| Transaction price (RMB/m2) |
— | 6,453 | 7,212 | 7,500 | ||||||||
| Purpose | Residential | Residential | Residential | Residential | ||||||||
| Structure | Reinforced concrete | Reinforced concrete | Reinforced concrete | Reinforced concrete | ||||||||
| Area (m2) | 132.88 | 218 | 104 | 104 | ||||||||
| Decoration condition | Decent | Average | Decent | Decent | ||||||||
| Orientation | North and South | North and South | North and South | North and South | ||||||||
| Floor | 7/24 | 2/12 | 8/10 | 12/24 | ||||||||
| Year of completion | 2020 | 2006 | 2019 | 2020 | ||||||||
| Traffic conditions | Good | Good | Good | Good | ||||||||
| Environment | Good | Average | Good | Good |
– 176 –
SUMMARY OF BUSINESS VALUATION REPORT
APPENDIX II
| Cases Valuation object Case A Case B Case C Infrastructure Complete Complete Complete Complete Public facilities Relatively complete Relatively complete Relatively complete Relatively complete Floor pattern Good Good Good Good Property management service Good Good Good Good |
|
|---|---|
-
(2) Correction of comparables
-
① Correction of transaction conditions
Comparables A, B and C are all normal market transactions, hence the correction coefficient for transaction conditions of 100/100 for all.
② Correction of transaction date
As the transaction dates of comparables A, B and C are close to the valuation date, and the prices of such type of properties are relatively stable within the same supply and demand circle, the correction coefficient for transaction date is 100/100 as well.
③ Equity adjustment
As the equity status of the valuation object is basically the same as that of comparables A, B, and C, the equity adjustment coefficients are 100/100.
- ④ Adjustment of location factors
Table of correction coefficients for location factors
| Comparables Comparative factors Traffic conditions Surrounding environment Public supporting facilities Infrastructure Floor Orientation Sub-total |
|
|---|---|
– 177 –
SUMMARY OF BUSINESS VALUATION REPORT
APPENDIX II
- ⑤ Adjustment of physical conditions
Table of physical conditions adjustment coefficients
| Comparables Comparative factors Decoration Year of completion GFA Floor pattern Property management service Sub-total |
|
|---|---|
- (3) Comparison correction
Table of comparison correction
| Correction | Correction | |||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Comparables | Unit price (RMB/m2) |
coefficient for transaction conditions |
coefficient for transaction date |
Adjustment coefficient for location factors |
Adjustment coefficient for physical factors |
Equity adjustment coefficient |
Unit price after correction (RMB/m2) |
Apprised unit price (RMB/m2) |
||||||||||||||||
| Case A | 6,453 | 100/100 | 100/100 | 100/94.5 | 100/89 | 100/100 | 7,673 | |||||||||||||||||
| Case B | 7,212 | 100/100 | 100/100 | 100/99.5 | 100/101 | 100/100 | 7,176 | 7,360 | ||||||||||||||||
| Case C | 7,500 | 100/100 | 100/100 | 100/102.5 | 100/101 | 100/100 | 7,245 |
Notes: ① Unit price after correction= transaction price of object of comparison × correction coefficient for transaction conditions × correction coefficient for transaction date × adjustment coefficient for location factors × adjustment coefficient for condition factors ×Equity adjustment coefficient;
-
② Appraised unit price is the arithmetic average of the three unit prices after correction, with the calculation results accurate to 2 decimal places.
-
(4) Determination of the value of the valuation object
Total value of real estate = Apprised unit price × GFA
- =7,360×132.88 ≈977,997 (RMB)
– 178 –
SUMMARY OF BUSINESS VALUATION REPORT
APPENDIX II
Through calculation, the appraised value of the two residential housing is as follows:
| Total | Price | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No. | Valuation object | GFA (m2) |
Apprised unit price (RMB/m2) appraised value (RMB) exclusive of tax (RMB) |
||||||||||||
| 1 | Room 2403, 24/F, Building 1, Agile Xiyuan 103.41 |
7,310 | 755,927 693,511 |
||||||||||||
| 2 | Room 701, 7/F, Building 1, Agile Xiyuan 132.88 |
7,360 | 977,997 897,245 |
||||||||||||
| Total | 236.29 | 1,733,924 1,590,756 |
Note: The value-added tax rate is 9%.
ii. Valuation of shop
The shop subject to valuation is Room 107, 1/F, Building 6, Yajule Xiyuan. The calculation process is as follows:
- (1) Calculation of annual net income A
Most of the shops similar to the valuation object are mainly operated for rent, so the annual net income of the shop subject to valuation is calculated based on the rent income.
1) Calculation of objective daily rent
The valuation object is a shop. The appraisers conducted a survey on the property leasing market of the same type in the location where the valuation object is located, and selected recent real estate rental cases that are similar to the valuation object in use, scale, and grade and are relevant and alternative. Based on the conditions of the valuation object and comparables, the appraisers analyzes, compared and corrected the factors that affect the rent in the real estate market, such as location factors, physical factors, transaction date and transaction conditions, to obtain the objective average daily rent of the valuation object.
A. Selection of comparables
Through market research, we selected three comparables similar to the valuation object, and based on the principle of replaceability, in accordance with the requirements of similar location (or in the same supply and demand circle), same purpose, same transaction type and similar valuation
– 179 –
SUMMARY OF BUSINESS VALUATION REPORT
APPENDIX II
date. The comparables selected in the valuation are (1) located at the 1st floor of Agile Xiyuan Community facing the street and in the same community as the valuation object; (2) are all rental cases in 2023 with the dates close to the appraisal reference date, i.e. 30 September 2023; (3) are of commercial purpose; (4) are of decent decoration condition; (5) with relatively complete infrastructure and public facilities; and (6) good property management service. Details are as follows:
Case A: a shop on the 1st floor of Agile Xiyuan Community facing the street and adjacent to the gate of the community, with a GFA of approximately 50m[2] , and the daily rent is RMB1.64/m[2] .
Case B: a shop on the 1st floor of Agile Xiyuan Community facing the street and at the south side of the gate of the community, with a GFA of approximately 40m[2] , and the daily rent is RMB1.50/m[2] .
Case C: a shop on the 1st floor of Agile Xiyuan Community facing the street and adjacent to the parking lot, with a GFA of approximately 40m[2] , and the daily rent is RMB1.25/m[2] .
Table of comparative factors and conditions for comparables
| Cases | Valuation object | Case A | Case A | Case B | Case B | Case C | Case C | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Project name | Agile Xiyuan | Agile Xiyuan | Agile Xiyuan | Agile Xiyuan | |||||||
| Daily rent (RMB/m2) | — | 1.64 | 1.5 | 1.25 | |||||||
| Purpose | Commercial | Commercial | Commercial | Commercial | |||||||
| Floor | 1st floor | 1st floor | 1st floor | 1st floor | |||||||
| Decoration condition | Decent | Decent | Decent | Decent | |||||||
| Location | North side of the gate (general) |
Close to the gate (good) |
South side of the gate (general) |
Close to the parking lot (poor) |
|||||||
| Infrastructure | Relatively complete | Relatively complete | Relatively complete | Relatively complete | |||||||
| Public facilities | Relatively complete | Relatively complete | Relatively complete | Relatively complete | |||||||
| Frontage road condition | Road on one side | Road on one side | Road on one side | Road on one side | |||||||
| GFA (m2) | 49.02 | 50 | 40 | 40 | |||||||
| Functional layout | General | Good | Good | Good | |||||||
| Property management service |
Good | Good | Good | Good | |||||||
| Lease date (year) | — | 2023 | 2023 | 2023 |
– 180 –
SUMMARY OF BUSINESS VALUATION REPORT
APPENDIX II
-
B. Correction of comparables
-
① Correction of transaction conditions
Comparables A, B and C are all normal market transactions, hence the correction coefficient for transaction conditions of 100/100 for all.
- ② Correction of transaction date
As the transaction dates of comparables A, B and C are close to the valuation date, and the prices of such type of properties are relatively stable within the same supply and demand circle, the correction coefficient for transaction date is 100/100 as well.
- ③ Adjustment of location factors
Table of adjustment coefficients for location factors
| Comparables Comparative factors Frontage road condition Public supporting facilities Infrastructure Location Floor Sub-total |
|
|---|---|
- ④ Adjustment of physical conditions
Table of adjustment coefficients for physical conditions
| Comparables Comparative factors Functional layout Facilities and equipment Property management service Decoration GFA Sub-total |
|
|---|---|
– 181 –
SUMMARY OF BUSINESS VALUATION REPORT
APPENDIX II
- C. Comparison correction
Table of comparison correction
| Correction | Correction | |||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| coefficient | coefficient | Adjustment | Adjustment | Unit price | Appraised | |||||||||||||||
| Comparables | Daily rent (RMB/m2) |
for transaction conditions |
for transaction date |
coefficient for location factors |
coefficient for physical factors |
after correction (RMB/m2) |
value of daily rent (RMB/m2) |
|||||||||||||
| Case | A | 1.64 | 100/100 | 100/100 | 100/110 | 100/100 | 1.49 | |||||||||||||
| Case | B | 1.50 | 100/100 | 100/100 | 100/105 | 100/100 | 1.43 | 1.4 | ||||||||||||
| Case | C | 1.25 | 100/100 | 100/100 | 100/100 | 100/100 | 1.25 |
-
Notes: ① Unit price after correction= lease price of comparables × correction coefficient for transaction conditions × correction coefficient for transaction date × adjustment coefficient for location factors × adjustment coefficient for physical factors
-
② Appraised unit price is the arithmetic average of the three unit prices after correction, with the calculation results accurate to 1 decimal place.
-
2) Calculation of annual net income of the valuation object
Through the above calculation process, the objective daily rental income of the valuation object is determined to be RMB1.4/m[2] . Based on market survey, the appraisers further understood that the annual vacancy rate of the same type of real estate in the region where the valuation object is located ranges from 5% to 12%. Taking into account the geographical location of the valuation object and other actual conditions, the median vacancy rate of the valuation object is 8% (calculated based on 365 days in a year).
==> picture [251 x 42] intentionally omitted <==
Through investigation, the appraisers understood that the rent constitutes the majority of operating income of real estate similar to the valuation object, so the annual net income of the valuation object is RMB470/m[2] .
Based on the investigation, it has been determined that lease income for real estate typically occurs at the beginning of the lease term. However, the income approach formula for capitalizing returns assumes that the net income of future periods will occur at the end of the lease term, rather
– 182 –
SUMMARY OF BUSINESS VALUATION REPORT
APPENDIX II
than the appraisal reference date. In this case, the comparable examples all have lease income at the beginning of the lease term. Therefore, the net income needs to be adjusted using the following formula: End of A = Beginning of A (1+Y).
Then the valuation object: End of A = Beginning of A (1+Y) = 3,240 x (1+Y).
(2) Determination of the return rate (Y)
The return rate of real estate essentially represents the earnings yield of real estate investment assets. According to the Real Estate Valuation Regulations, the return rate can be determined using the safe rate plus the risk-adjusted value method. The safe interest rate can be selected from the annual interest rate of one-year treasury bonds or the annual interest rate of one-year fixed-term lump-sum deposits published by the People’s Bank of China. The risk-adjusted value should be determined based on the current economic situation, future forecasts of the region where the valuation object is located, as well as the usage and age of the valuation object. In line with the principle of the safe interest rate plus risk adjustment, we have selected the one-year deposit rate of 1.5% published by the People’s Bank of China on 24 October 2015, as the safe rate. Considering the social, political, economic, and environmental factors that impact the value of real estate in the region where the valuation object is located on the appraisal reference date, we have chosen 6.0% as the risk-adjusted value, resulting in a return rate (Y) of 7.5%.
(3) Determination of the income-generating years (n)
The valuation object was constructed in 2021, and its reinforced concrete structure has a durability of 60 years. As of the reference date, the valuation object has been in use for 2 years. Therefore, the remaining useful life of the building is 58 years. According to the information provided by the client, the remaining term of the land use right as of the appraisal reference date is 34.62 years. Applying the principle of the shorter term, the determined income-generating years is 34.62 years.
(4) Determination of net income incremental rate (g)
Taking into account the correlation between the increase in rental prices and inflation, and with reference to the latest CPI published by the National Bureau of Statistics of China, the net income incremental rate of the valuation object has been determined to be 2.0% per annum, which was made after a comprehensive analysis conducted by the appraisers, considering the economic conditions of the region where the valuation object is located, the rental market conditions of similar properties, and the specific circumstances of the valuation object.
– 183 –
SUMMARY OF BUSINESS VALUATION REPORT
APPENDIX II
- (5) Determination of value of the shops of the valuation object
==> picture [195 x 99] intentionally omitted <==
≈ 7,700 (RMB/m[2] ) Total price = unit price×gross floor area
= 7,700×49.02 ≈ 377,454
The market value of the shop located at Room 107, 1/F, Building 6 is RMB377,454, and RMB346,288 exclusive of tax (9% VAT rate).
iii. Evaluation of right-of-use of underground parking spaces
The underground parking spaces of the valuation object comprise 337 underground parking lots, which are not available for sales since they have yet not been issued the certificates of title. Through investigation, it is understood that the underground the valuation object can obtain income from those parking spaces by leasing them out, so the income approach is selected to evaluate the value of the right-of-use of the underground parking spaces.
Generally, the value of the right-of-use varies slightly depending on the location of the parking spaces. Based on the purpose of valuation, the average value of the right-of-use of parking spaces is calculated using the income approach in this valuation.
(1) Calculation of the average annual net income per parking space
Through the investigation, we have learned that the underground parking spaces in the valuation object can be rented out to generate income. They are typically classified into long-term rentals (with a maximum rental period of 20years) and short-term rentals (on an annual basis). For the purpose of valuation, the rental incois considered on an annual basis.
According to the market survey conducted by the appraisers, the monthly rental for underground parking spaces in the area of the valuation object ranges from RMB250/month to RMB350/month. Considering the specific circumstances of the valuation object, the average
– 184 –
SUMMARY OF BUSINESS VALUATION REPORT
APPENDIX II
monthly rental income for the parking spaces is determined to be RMB300/month, resulting in an annual rental income of RMB3,600. It is also understood that the annual vacancy rate for parking spaces of the same type in the area of the valuation object is approximately 10%.
Annual Net Income A = Annual Rent x (1 −Vacancy Rate)
==> picture [80 x 26] intentionally omitted <==
Based on the investigation, it has been determined that lease income for real estate typically occurs at the beginning of the lease term. However, the income approach formula for capitalizing returns assumes that the net income of future periods will occur at the end of the lease term, rather than the appraisal reference date. In this case, the comparable examples all have lease income at the beginning of the lease term. Therefore, the net income needs to be adjusted using the following formula: End of A = Beginning of A (1+Y).
Then the valuation object: End of A = Beginning of A (1+Y) = 3,240 x (1+Y).
(2) Determination of the return rate (Y)
The return rate of real estate essentially represents the earnings yield of real estate investment assets. According to the Real Estate Valuation Regulations, the return rate can be determined using the safe rate plus the risk-adjusted value method. The safe interest rate can be selected from the annual interest rate of one-year treasury bonds or the annual interest rate of one-year fixed-term lump-sum deposits published by the People’s Bank of China. The risk-adjusted value should be determined based on the current economic situation, future forecasts of the region where the valuation object is located, as well as the usage and age of the valuation object. In line with the principle of the safe interest rate plus risk adjustment, we have selected the one-year deposit rate of 1.5% published by the People’s Bank of China on 24 October 2015, as the safe rate. Considering the social, political, economic, and environmental factors that impact the value of real estate in the region where the valuation object is located on the appraisal reference date, we have chosen 6.0% as the risk-adjusted value, resulting in a return rate (Y) of 7.5%.
(3) Determination of the income-generating years (n)
The valuation object was constructed in 2021, and its reinforced concrete structure has a durability of 60 years. As of the reference date, the valuation object has been in use for 2 years. Therefore, the remaining useful life of the building is 58 years. According to the information provided by the client, the remaining term of the land use right as of the appraisal reference date is 63.13 years. Applying the principle of the shorter term, the determined income-generating years is 58 years.
– 185 –
SUMMARY OF BUSINESS VALUATION REPORT
APPENDIX II
- (4) Determination of net income incremental rate (g)
Taking into account the correlation between the increase in rental prices and inflation, and with reference to the latest CPI published by the National Bureau of Statistics of China, the net income incremental rate of the valuation object has been determined to be 2.0% per annum, which was made after a comprehensive analysis conducted by the appraisers, considering the economic conditions of the region where the valuation object is located, the rental market conditions of similar properties, and the specific circumstances of the valuation object.
- (5) Determination of the value of a parking space
==> picture [123 x 35] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [194 x 35] intentionally omitted <==
- ≈ 60,316 (RMB)
As this valuation is based on the average price of all the parking spaces, it has been rounded to the nearest RMB603,000,000, following the practice of leasing and selling parking spaces.
- Determination of the total value of the use rights for all inventory parking spaces
60,300×337 = 20,321,100(RMB)
Value exclusive of tax was RMB18,643,211 (VAT 9%)
– 186 –
SUMMARY OF BUSINESS VALUATION REPORT
APPENDIX II
- iv. Determination of total values of inventories-development products
The valuation results for inventory — development products, based on market value, should deduct the anticipated value-added tax (9% for output VAT, with a combined rate of approximately 4.30% for output tax minus input tax) and surcharges (12% of the VAT) that are expected to occur during the realization process, as well as the land value-added tax (1.50% for residential and 2.50% for non-residential, excluded based on project specifics), corporate income tax (calculated at an average gross profit of 10%, with a tax rate of 25%), sales management fee (3%), and interest rate (8.5%). The calculation results are summarized in the following table.
| Total | Total | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No. | Valuation object | Price inclusive of tax (RMB) |
Value-added tax (RMB) |
Surcharge (RMB) |
Land value-added tax (RMB) |
Corporate income tax (RMB) |
Sales management fee (RMB) |
Profits (RMB) |
appraised value (RMB) |
|||||||||||||||||
| Residential housing at | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 1 | Room 2403, 24/F, Building 1, Agile |
693,511 | 32,505 | 3,901 | 10,403 | 17,338 | 20,805 | 58,948 | 582,116 | |||||||||||||||||
| Xiyuan | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Residential housing at | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2 | Room 701, 7/F, Building 1, Agile |
897,245 | 42,054 | 5,046 | 13,459 | 22,431 | 26,917 | 76,266 | 753,126 | |||||||||||||||||
| Xiyuan | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 3 | Shop 107, 1/F, Building 6, Agile Xiyuan 346,288 |
16,231 | 1,948 | 8,657 | 8,657 | 10,389 | 29,434 | 287,203 | ||||||||||||||||||
| 4 | 337 lots | 18,643,211 | 873,807 | 104,857 | 466,080 | 466,080 | 559,296 | 1,584,673 | 15,462,224 | |||||||||||||||||
| Total | 17,084,669 |
– 187 –
SUMMARY OF BUSINESS VALUATION REPORT
APPENDIX II
-
Inventory valuation results and appreciation/depreciation analysis
-
(1) Valuation results
Summary of Inventory Valuation Results
Unit: RMB
| Item Carrying value Appraised value Appreciation/ depreciation Appreciation rate (%) Inventories — development products 21,020,137.28 17,084,669.00 -3,935,468.28 -18.72 Total inventories 21,020,137.28 17,084,669.00 -3,935,468.28 -18.72 |
|
|---|---|
- (2) Analysis of reasons for appreciation/depreciation
The depreciation of development products is due to the fact that the carrying value reflects the investment cost of the project, and the appraised value is the market fair value, which is the result of the market value of the project deducting subsequent transaction taxes and profits, resulting in the depreciation of such assets.
7.2.2 Technical Description of Valuation of Liabilities
7.2.2.1 Scope of valuation
The liabilities included in the scope of the valuation are current liabilities.
Current liabilities include accounts payable, advances from customers, taxes payable, dividends payable and other payables. The carrying value as at the appraisal reference date is shown in the table below:
Breakdown of Carrying Value of Current Liabilities
Unit: RMB
| Item Carrying value Accounts payable 14,542,380.97 Advances from customers 4,343,978.96 |
|
|---|---|
– 188 –
SUMMARY OF BUSINESS VALUATION REPORT
APPENDIX II
| Item Carrying value Tax payable 6,918,989.15 Dividends payable 68,880,856.55 Other payables 6,362,572.10 Total current liabilities 101,048,777.73 |
|
|---|---|
7.2.2.2 Verification process
-
Reconciliation of carrying value: the appraisers firstly checked the corresponding items in the balance sheet of the valued entity against the liability valuation declaration statement provided by the valued entity to determine whether the total liabilities stated in these two statements are consistent with each other. Then, the appraisers verified the detailed ledger and ledger of the liabilities of the valued entity against the liability valuation declaration statement to determine whether the breakdown amount and contents stated in these statements are consistent with each other. Finally, according to the principle of materiality, the appraisers checked the original accounting vouchers for large-amount liabilities.
-
Information collection: In accordance with the principle of materiality, the appraisers collected the tax payment certificates as at the appraisal reference date based on the typical characteristics of various liabilities, as well as certain accounting vouchers and other valuation-related information.
-
On-site interviews: The appraisers interviewed the relevant personnel of the valued entity to understand the types of taxes, tax rates and tax systems of the valued entity; and conducted investigations to understand the composition of employees and their remuneration system.
7.2.2.3 Valuation approach
(A) Accounts payable
The carrying value of accounts payable as at the appraisal reference date was RMB14,542,380.97. The accounting items included payables for construction and materials. This valuation was to verify the authenticity and completeness of the payables by verifying the original vouchers and relevant contracts of each payment, and then to determine the appraised value based on the verified carrying amount.
– 189 –
SUMMARY OF BUSINESS VALUATION REPORT
APPENDIX II
The appraised value of accounts payable was RMB14,542,380.97.
(B) Advances from customers
The carrying value of advances from customers as at the appraisal reference date was RMB4,343,978.96. The accounting items are the deposits received in advance, refund payable, and non-refund, etc. of the valued entity. This valuation is to verify the authenticity and completeness of advances from customers by verifying the original vouchers and relevant contracts of each payment, and then to determine the appraised value based on the verified carrying amount.
The appraised value of advances from customers was RMB4,343,978.96.
(C) Taxes payable
The carrying value of taxes payable as at the appraisal reference date was RMB6,918,989.15. The accounting items are various taxes and fees payable by the valued entity. This valuation is to examine the accounting, provision and payment of various taxes in accordance with the provisions of national tax laws and regulations, and then to determine the appraised value of the estimated tax based on the verified amount.
The appraised value of taxes payable was RMB6,918,989.15.
(D) Other payables
The appraised value of other payables as at the appraisal reference date was RMB75,243,428.65. Other payables comprised 25 items, one of which is the dividend payable. The amount of the dividend payable was RMB68,880,856.55. The accounting items are all payables of the valued entity other than accounts payable, advances from customers and taxes payable. This valuation is to verify the authenticity and completeness of other payables by verifying the original vouchers and relevant contracts of each payment, and then to determine the appraised value based on the verified carrying value.
The appraised value of other payables was RMB75,243,428.65, and the appraised value of dividends payable was RMB68,880,856.55.
– 190 –
SUMMARY OF BUSINESS VALUATION REPORT
APPENDIX II
7.2.2.4 Valuation results
The valuation results of current liabilities are as follows:
Valuation Result of Current Liabilities
Unit: RMB
| Item | Carrying value Appraised value |
Carrying value Appraised value |
||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Accounts payable | 14,542,380.97 | 14,542,380.97 | ||||
| Advances from customers | 4,343,978.96 | 4,343,978.96 | ||||
| Tax payable | 6,918,989.15 | 6,918,989.15 | ||||
| Other payables | 75,243,428.65 | 75,243,428.65 | ||||
| Including: Dividends payable | 68,880,856.55 | 68,880,856.55 | ||||
| Total current liabilities | 101,048,777.73 | 101,048,777.73 |
7.3 Valuation Conclusion and Analysis
7.3.1 Valuation Conclusion
Based on the valuation procedures such as checking and verification, on-site investigation, market survey and confirmation, as well as assessment and estimation, the valuation conclusion arrived at using the asset-based approach is as follows:
As of 30 September 2023, being the appraisal reference date, under the premise of open market and the assumptions and special matters mentioned in this report, the total carrying value of assets of Jinzhong Xiya Real Estate Development Co., Ltd. was RMB1,911,493,909,100, and the appraised value was RMB1,874,179,166,800; the total carrying value of liabilities was RMB101,048,800, and the appraised value was RMB101,048,800; the total carrying value of all shareholders’ equity was RMB90,100,600, and the appraised value was RMB86,369,100.
The carrying value of 67% equity interest in Jinzhong Xiya held by Jinzhong Development was RMB60,367,400, and the appraised value was RMB57,867,300.
– 191 –
SUMMARY OF BUSINESS VALUATION REPORT
APPENDIX II
Details of the valuation conclusion are as follows:
Summary of Asset Valuation Results
Appraisal reference date: 30 September 2023
Valued entity: Jinzhong Xiya Real Estate Development Co., Ltd.
Unit: RMB’0,000
| Item | Item | Carrying value | Appraised value | Appreciation/ depreciation |
Appreciation rate % | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A | B | C = B-A | D = C/A×100% | |||||||||||
| Current assets | 19,113.30 | 18,719.76 | -393.54 | -2.06 | ||||||||||
| 1 | ||||||||||||||
| Including: | inventories | 21,020.14 | 17,084.67 | -3,935.47 | -18.72 | |||||||||
| Non-current assets | 1.64 | 22.03 | 20.39 | 1,243.29 | ||||||||||
| 2 | Fixed assets | 1.64 | 22.03 | 20.39 | 1,243.29 | |||||||||
| Total assets | 191,149.39 | 187,417.92 | -3,731.47 | -1.95 | ||||||||||
| Current liabilities | 10,104.88 | 10,104.88 | — | — | ||||||||||
| 3 | Total liabilities | 10,104.88 | 10,104.88 | — | — | |||||||||
| Net assets (owner’s equity) | 9,010.06 | 8,636.91 | -373.15 | -4.14 | ||||||||||
| 67% shares of Jinzhong | ||||||||||||||
| 4 | Development Zone Real | 6036.74 | 5786.73 | -250.01 | ||||||||||
| Estate Development Co., Ltd. |
– 192 –
SUMMARY OF BUSINESS VALUATION REPORT
APPENDIX II
- 7.3.2 Difference between valuation result under the asset-based approach and the carrying value and the reasons for difference
There are the following differences between the valuation result under the above asset-based approach and the verified carrying value:
Unit: RMB’0,000
| Item Carrying value Appraised value Appreciation/ depreciation value Appreciation rate Inventories 21,020,14 17,084.67 -3,935.47 -18.72 Fixed assets 1.64 22.03 20.39 1,243.29 |
|
|---|---|
The reasons for appreciation are as follows:
- The reasons for the appreciation or depreciation of the appraised value of inventories are as follows:
The depreciation of development products is due to the fact that the carrying value reflects the investment cost of the project, and the appraised value is the market fair value, which is the result of the market value of the project deducting subsequent transaction taxes and profits, resulting in the depreciation of such assets.
-
Fixed assets: mainly comprising vehicles and electronic equipment
-
(1) Changes in replacement costs due to fluctuations in market prices and price indices, which in turn affects the value of replacement costs;
-
(2) The difference between the years of depreciation for which the enterprise make provision and the economic life and use of the equipment affects the newness rate, resulting in the net appraised value being greater than the net carrying value.
– 193 –
SUMMARY OF BUSINESS VALUATION REPORT
APPENDIX II
- 7.3.3 Consideration regarding the impact of control and liquidity on the value of the valuation object
This valuation report neither takes into account the impact of the premium that may arise from the ownership of control on the value of the valuation object, nor does it take into account the impact of equity liquidity on the valuation results.
Shanxi Jiahao Real Estate Asset Appraisal Co., Ltd * (山西家豪房地產資產評估有限公司)
Asset appraiser: Bai Yuan
(Full practicing member Asset appraiser number: 14210012)
Asset appraiser: Hou Xingxing
(Full practicing member Asset appraiser number: 14230025)
Note: Bai Yuan, as a registered asset appraiser, a registered real estate appraiser, a land appraiser and a price appraiser, is a full practicing member of China Appraisal Society (Asset Appraiser No.: 14210012), a member of China Institute of Real Estate Appraisers and Agents, and a member of Shanxi Association of Land Appraisers and Land Registration Agents, and has been engaged in real estate appraisal for 17 years.
Hou Xingxing, as a certified public accountant, a certified asset appraiser and an intermediate accountant, is a full practicing member of China Appraisal Society (Asset Appraiser No.: 14230025).
The appraisal exercise has been conducted independently and without influence from any third party in any manner.
21 December 2023
– 194 –
PROPERTY VALUATION REPORT
APPENDIX III
The following is the text of a letter, a valuation summary and valuation certificates prepared for the purpose of incorporation in this circular received from Vincorn Consulting and Appraisal Limited, an independent valuer, in connection with its valuation of the property interests to be disposed of by the Group. Terms defined in this appendix applies to this appendix only.
Vincorn Consulting and Appraisal Limited
Units 1602–4, 16/F FWD Financial Centre No. 308 Des Voeux Road Central Hong Kong
==> picture [153 x 40] intentionally omitted <==
The Board of Directors Chen Xing Development Holdings Limited Floor 40, Dah Sing Financial Centre, 248 Queen’s Road East, Wanchai, Hong Kong
28 March 2024
Dear Sirs,
INSTRUCTION AND VALUATION DATE
We refer to your instructions for us to assess the Market Values of the property interests located in The People’s Republic of China (“ The PRC ”) to be disposed of by Chen Xing Development Holdings Limited (the “ Company ”) and its subsidiaries (hereinafter together referred to as the “ Group ”) for the purposes of public disclosure. We confirm that we have carried out inspection, made relevant enquiries and searches and obtained such further information as we consider necessary in order to provide you with our opinion of the Market Values of the property interests as at 31 December 2023 (the “ Valuation Date ”).
VALUATION STANDARDS
The valuation has been prepared in accordance with the HKIS Valuation Standards 2020 published by The Hong Kong Institute of Surveyors effective from 31 December 2020 with reference to the International Valuation Standards published by the International Valuation Standards Council effective from 31 January 2022; and the requirements set out in the Chapter 5 and Practice Note 12 of the Rules Governing the Listing of Securities on The Stock Exchange of Hong Kong Limited.
– 195 –
PROPERTY VALUATION REPORT
APPENDIX III
VALUATION BASIS
Our valuation has been undertaken on the basis of Market Value. Market Value is defined as “the estimated amount for which an asset or liability should exchange on the valuation date between a willing buyer and a willing seller in an arm’s length transaction, after proper marketing and where the parties had each acted knowledgeably, prudently and without compulsion”.
VALUATION ASSUMPTIONS
Our valuation has been made on the assumption that the seller sells the property interests in the market without the benefit of a deferred term contract, leaseback, joint venture, management agreement or any similar arrangement, which could serve to affect the values of the property interests.
No allowances have been made for any charges, mortgages or amounts owing on the property interests, nor for any expenses or taxations which may be incurred in effecting a sale. Unless otherwise stated, it is assumed that the property interests are free from encumbrances, restrictions and outgoings of an onerous nature, which could affect the values of the property interests.
As the property interests are held under long term land use rights, we have assumed that the owner has free and uninterrupted rights to use the property interests for the whole of the unexpired term of the land use rights.
VALUATION METHODOLOGY
There are three principal valuation approaches under the HKIS Valuation Standards 2020 and the International Valuation Standards, namely Market Approach, Income Approach and Cost Approach.
Market Approach is universally considered as the most accepted valuation approach for valuing most forms of property when relevant sale comparables are sufficiently available in the market. Income Approach relies on the rental potential of a property and is usually adopted when there is a lack of relevant sale evidences for an income generating property. Cost Approach/ Asset-based Approach, which bases on an aggregate of the depreciated replacement costs of the existing buildings and the market cost of acquiring the land, is generally applied if the sale evidences and rental potential of a property are not able to be identified.
When valuing the property interests, recent sale comparables relevant in terms of physical and locational attributes were sufficiently available and therefore Market Approach as the most accepted valuation approach has been applied.
– 196 –
PROPERTY VALUATION REPORT
APPENDIX III
Market Approach involves the analysis of recent market evidence of similar properties to compare with the subject under valuation. Each comparable is analysed on the basis of its unit rate; each attribute of the comparables is then compared with the subject and where there are any differences, the unit rate is adjusted in order to arrive at the appropriate unit rate for the subject. This is done by making percentage adjustments to the unit rate for various factors, such as time, location, size and so on.
We have attributed no commercial value to the property interests which are yet to be granted with proper title certificates of building ownership rights as at the Valuation Date.
LAND TENURE AND TITLE INVESTIGATION
We have been provided with copies of documents in relation to the titles of the property interests. However, we have not scrutinized the original documents to verify ownership or to verify any amendments, which may not appear on the copies handed to us. We have relied to a considerable extent on information provided by the Group.
We have relied on the advices given by The PRC legal adviser of the Group, Shanxi Dingzheng Law Office, regarding the titles of the property interests in The PRC. We do not accept liability for any interpretation that we have placed on such information, which is more properly placed within the sphere of the legal adviser.
All legal documents disclosed in this letter, the valuation summary and the valuation certificates are for reference only. No responsibility is assumed for any legal matters concerning the legal titles to the property interests set out in this letter, the valuation summary and the valuation certificates.
INFORMATION SOURCES
We have relied to a considerable extent on information provided by the Group and the legal adviser, in respect of the titles of the property interests in The PRC. We have also accepted advice given to us on matters such as identification of the properties, particulars of occupancy, areas and all other relevant matters. Dimensions, measurements and areas included in the valuation are based on information contained in the documents provided to us and are, therefore, only approximations.
We have also been advised by the Group that no material factors or information have been omitted or withheld from information supplied and consider that we have been provided with sufficient information to reach an informed view. We believe that the assumptions used in preparing our valuation are reasonable and have had no reason to doubt the truth and accuracy of information provided to us by the Group which is material to the valuation.
– 197 –
PROPERTY VALUATION REPORT
APPENDIX III
INSPECTION AND INVESTIGATIONS
The properties were inspected externally and internally. Although not all areas were accessible for viewing at the time of inspection, we have endeavoured to inspect all areas of the properties. Investigations were carried out as necessary. Our investigations have been conducted independently and without influence from any third party in any manner.
We have not tested any services of the properties and are therefore unable to report on their present conditions. We have not undertaken any structural surveys of the properties and are therefore unable to comment on the structural conditions. We have not carried out any investigations on site to determine the suitability of the ground conditions for any future developments. Our valuation is prepared on the assumption that these aspects are satisfactory and that no extraordinary expenses or delays will be required.
We have not carried out any on-site measurements to verify the correctness of the areas in respect of the properties but have assumed that the areas shown on the documents or deduced from the plans are correct. All documents and plans have been used as reference only and all dimensions, measurements and areas are therefore approximations.
CURRENCY
Unless otherwise stated, all monetary figures stated in this report are in Renminbi (“ RMB ”).
The valuation summary and the valuation certificates are attached hereto.
Yours faithfully, For and on behalf of
Vincorn Consulting and Appraisal Limited
Vincent Cheung
BSc(Hons) MBA FHKIS FRICS RPS(GP) MCIREA MHKSI MISCM MHIREA FHKIoD RICS Registered Valuer
Registered Real Estate Appraiser & Agent PRC Managing Director
– 198 –
PROPERTY VALUATION REPORT
APPENDIX III
Note:
Vincent Cheung is a fellow of the Hong Kong Institute of Surveyors, a fellow of the Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors, a Registered Professional Surveyor (General Practice) under the Surveyors Registration Ordinance (Cap. 417) in Hong Kong Special Administrative Region (“ Hong Kong ”), a member of China Institute of Real Estate Appraisers and Agents, a member of Hong Kong Securities and Investment Institute, a member of Institute of Shopping Centre Management, a member of Hong Kong Institute of Real Estate Administrators, a fellow of the Hong Kong Institute of Directors, a Registered Valuer of the Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors and a Registered Real Estate Appraiser and Agent People’s Republic of China. He is suitably qualified to carry out the valuation and has over 26 years of experience in the valuation of fixed and intangible assets of this magnitude and nature in the subject region.
– 199 –
PROPERTY VALUATION REPORT
APPENDIX III
VALUATION SUMMARY
Group 1 — Property Interests for Sale to be disposed of by the Group in The PRC
| No. Property 1 Room 1 on Level 8 of Unit 1 of Block 4, Room 1 on Level 1 of Unit 2 of Block 4 and Room 3 on Level 4 of Unit 2 of Block 6 and a Community Centre and 418 Basement Carparking Spaces of Phase 1 within a Mixed-use Development Namely Yijun Community, North of Longhu West Avenue, South of Huazhang Street, East of Xueyuan East Road, Yuci District, Jinzhong, Shanxi Province, The PRC 2 Unit 701 on Level 7 of Block 2 and 339 Basement Carparking Spaces within a Mixed-use Development Namely Xiyuan Community, No. 306 Huitong North Road, Yuci District, Jinzhong, Shanxi Province, The PRC Sub-total: |
Market Value as at 31 December 2023 Interest Attributable to the Group Before Disposal 2,650,000 51% 1,100,000 33.66% 3,750,000 |
Market Value as at 31 December 2023 Attributable to the Group Before Disposal 1,351,500 370,260 |
|---|---|---|
| 1,721,760 |
– 200 –
PROPERTY VALUATION REPORT
APPENDIX III
Group 2 — Property Interests for Future Development Held to be disposed of by the Group in The PRC
| No. Property 3 A Portion of Phase 1 within a Mixed-use Development Namely Yijun Community, North of Longhu West Avenue, South of Huazhang Street, East of Xueyuan East Road, Yuci District, Jinzhong, Shanxi Province, The PRC 4 Phase 2 within a Mixed-use Development Namely Yijun Community, South of Huazhang Street, East of Xueyuan East Road, Yuci District, Jinzhong, Shanxi Province, The PRC 5 Phase 3 within a Mixed-use Development Namely Yijun Community, South of Huazhang Street, East of Guihua East 2nd Road, Yuci District, Jinzhong, Shanxi Province, The PRC Sub-total: Total: |
Market Value as at 31 December 2023 Interest Attributable to the Group Before Disposal RMB61,700,000 51% RMB15,400,000 51% RMB194,000,000 51% RMB271,100,000 RMB274,850,000 |
Market Value as at 31 December 2023 Attributable to the Group Before Disposal RMB31,467,000 RMB7,854,000 RMB98,940,000 RMB138,261,000 |
|---|---|---|
| RMB139,982,760 |
– 201 –
PROPERTY VALUATION REPORT
APPENDIX III
VALUATION CERTIFICATE
Group 1 — Property Interests for Sale to be disposed of by the Group in The PRC
| Market Value | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Occupancy | as at | ||||
| No | Property | Description and Tenure | Particulars | 31 December 2023 | |
| 1 | Room 1 on Level | The property comprises three residential | As per our on-site | RMB2,650,000 | |
| 8 of Unit 1 of | flats, a community centre and 418 | inspection and | (RENMINBI TWO | ||
| Block 4, Room 1 | basement carparking spaces within a | information | MILLION SIX | ||
| on Level 1 of Unit | mixed-use development namely Yijun | provided by the | HUNDRED AND | ||
| 2 of Block 4 and | Community (“Yijun Community”). As per | Group, the property | FIFTY | ||
| Room 3 on Level | information provided by the Group, it was | is currently | THOUSAND) | ||
| 4 of Unit 2 of | completed in about 2020. | available for sale. | |||
| Block 6 and a | 51% Interest | ||||
| Community Centre | As per information provided by the Group, | Attributable to the | |||
| and 418 Basement | the property has a total gross floor area | Group before | |||
| Carparking Spaces | (“GFA”) of approximately 17,792.41 square | Disposal: | |||
| of Phase 1 within | metres (“sq.m.”). The GFA breakdown of | ||||
| a Mixed-use | the property is listed as below:- | RMB1,351,500 | |||
| Development | (RENMINBI ONE | ||||
| Namely Yijun | Portion | GFA | MILLION THREE | ||
| Community, North | (sq.m.) | HUNDRED AND | |||
| of Longhu West | FIFTY ONE | ||||
| Avenue, South of | Three residential flats | THOUSAND FIVE | |||
| Huazhang Street, | (known as Room 1 on | HUNDRED) | |||
| East of Xueyuan | Level 8 of Unit 1 of | ||||
| East Road, Yuci | Block 4, Room 1 on | ||||
| District, Jinzhong, | Level 1 of Unit 2 of | ||||
| Shanxi Province, | Block 4 and Room 3 | ||||
| The PRC | on Level 4 of Unit 2 | ||||
| of Block 6) | 320.41 | ||||
| A community centre | 832.00 | ||||
| 418 basement carparking | |||||
| spaces | 16,640.00 | ||||
| Total: | 17,792.41 |
The land use rights of Phase 1 of Yijun Community were granted for a term expiring on 17 May 2086 for residential uses.
Notes:
- The property was inspected by Ines Wang MSc Real Estate Probationer of RICS on 6 February 2024.
– 202 –
APPENDIX III
PROPERTY VALUATION REPORT
-
The valuation and this certificate were prepared by Vincent Cheung BSc(Hons) MBA FHKIS FRICS RPS(GP) MCIREA MHKSI MISCM FHKIoD MHIREA RICS Registered Valuer Registered Real Estate Appraiser & Agent PRC and Kit Cheung BSc(Hons) MHKIS MRICS RPS(GP) MHIREA MCIREA RICS Registered Valuer Registered Real Estate Appraiser PRC .
-
Pursuant to a State-owned Land Use Rights Grant Contract, Jin Zhong Kai Chu Tu (2016) No. 3 dated 17 May 2016 and entered into between Shanxi Province Land and Resources Bureau Jinzhong Economic and Technological Development Zone Land Branch and Jinzhong Development Zone Real Estate Development Co., Limited, the land use rights of Phase 1 of Yijun Community with a site area of 46,762.59 sq.m. were granted to Jinzhong Development Zone Real Estate Development Co., Limited for a term of 70 years for residential uses at a consideration of RMB83,400,000.
-
Pursuant to a State-Owned Land Use Rights Certificate, Jin Kai Guo Yong (2016) Di No. 0207004 dated 1 July 2016 and issued by the People’s Government of Jinzhong, the land use rights of Phase 1 of Yijun Community with a site area of 46,762.59 sq.m. were granted to Jinzhong Development Zone Real Estate Development Co., Limited for a term expiring on 17 May 2086 for residential uses.
-
Pursuant to a Construction Project Work Completion Certificate, Jin Kai Jian Jun Bei An (2020) Nian No. 026 dated 20 November 2020 issued by Shanxi Transform Comprehensive Reform Demonstration Zone Jinzhong Development Zone Management Committee, the completion of construction of a portion of Phase 1 of Yijun Community, which the property situated in, was permitted.
-
Pursuant to two Shanxi Province Commodity House Pre-sale Permits, Jin Shang Fang Yu Shou Kai Zi Di Nos. 2019002 and 2019003 dated 11 January 2019 and 1 February 2019 respectively and issued by Shanxi Transform Comprehensive Reform Demonstration Zone Jinzhong Development Zone Management Committee, the pre-sale of Phase 1 of Yijun Community, which the property situated in, was permitted.
-
Pursuant to three Real Estate Title Certificates, and issued by Jinzhong Natural Resources and Planning Bureau, the land use rights and the building ownership right of three residential flats of the property, with a shared site area of approximately 46,762.59 sq.m. and a total GFA of approximately 320.41 sq.m. were legally vested in Jinzhong Development Zone Real Estate Development Co., Limited. The land use rights of the property were granted for a term expiring on 17 May 2086 for residential uses.
The details of the Real Estate Title Certificates are summarized below:
| Portion Certificate No. Issued Date Room 1 on Level 8 of Unit 1 of Block 4 Jin (2022) Jin Zhong Shi Bu Dong Chan Quan Di No. 0038122 7 July 2022 Room 1 on Level 1 of Unit 2 of Block 4 Jin (2022) Jin Zhong Shi Bu Dong Chan Quan Di No. 0038106 7 July 2022 Room 3 on Level 4 of Unit 2 of Block 6 Jin (2022) Jin Zhong Shi Bu Dong Chan Quan Di No. 0077195 9 November 2022 Total: |
GFA (sq.m.) 118.38 115.91 86.12 |
|---|---|
| 320.41 |
– 203 –
PROPERTY VALUATION REPORT
APPENDIX III
- The general description and market information of the property are summarized below:
Location : The property is located at North of Longhu West Avenue, South of Huazhang Street, East of Xueyuan East Road, Yuci District, Jinzhong, Shanxi Province, The PRC. Transportation : Taiyuan Wusu International Airport and Jinzhong Railway Station are located approximately 9.3 kilometres and 6.1 kilometres away from the property respectively. Nature of Surrounding Area : The area is predominately a residential area in Yuci District.
-
We have been provided with a legal opinion regarding the property by Shanxi Dingzheng Law Office, which contains, inter alia, the following:
-
a. Jinzhong Development Zone Real Estate Development Co., Limited has obtained the state-owned land use rights of the property and building ownership rights of three residential flats of the property in accordance with laws, and is the legal holder of the state-owned land use rights of the property.
-
b. Jinzhong Development Zone Real Estate Development Co., Limited can occupy, use, let, transfer, mortgage or by other means handle the relevant state-owned land use rights of the property and building ownership rights of three residential flats of the property.
-
c. The state-owned land use rights of the property and building ownership rights of three residential flats of the property, are not subject to a mortgage, and are not subject to any dispute or seizure.
-
d. The community centre and basement carparking spaces of the property are not eligible to obtain any title certificates of building ownership rights in accordance with relevant local policies and regulations. Therefore, there are no title defect issues in relation to the property.
-
In the course of our valuation of market value of three residential flats of the property, we have considered and analysed relevant residential flat sales comparables.
Considering that the subject valued comprises newly completed residential flats located in Yuci District, we have identified and analysed four residential flat sale comparables with current offerings located in Yuci District and completed within five years from the Valuation Date on an exhaustive basis. Hence the comparables adopted are relevant to the subject valued in terms of property type and location. The comparables adopted are completed within recent years, and thus are subject to similar building conditions as the subject valued. The following table shows the details of four residential flat sale comparables and the adopted adjustments:
| Comparable 1 | Comparable 2 | Comparable 3 | Comparable 4 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Development | Yucichengjianyanyuan | Poly•Jinshang | Shiguangyinxiang | Vanke Zijun |
| District | Yuci District | Yuci District | Yuci District | Yuci District |
| City | Jinzhong | Jinzhong | Jinzhong | Jinzhong |
| Year of Completion | 2020 | 2023 | 2023 | 2021 |
| Property Type | Residential flat | Residential flat | Residential flat | Residential flat |
| Unit Size (sq.m.) | 130.00 | 115.00 | 120.00 | 139.00 |
| View | City View | City View | City View | City View |
| Nature | Offer | Offer | Offer | Offer |
– 204 –
APPENDIX III
PROPERTY VALUATION REPORT
| Comparable 1 | Comparable 2 | Comparable 3 | Comparable 4 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Achievable Unit Rate | 8,200 | 9,000 | 8,150 | 9,000 |
| (RMB/sq.m.) | ||||
| Adjustment | ||||
| Discount on Offer Price | -3.0% | -3.0% | -3.0% | -3.0% |
| Location | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Building Age | 0.0% | -1.5% | -1.5% | -0.5% |
| Size | +0.1% | 0.0% | +0.1% | +0.2% |
| View | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Adjusted Unit Rate | 7,964 | 8,599 | 7,789 | 8,699 |
| (RMB/sq.m.) |
Adjustments in terms of different aspects, including discount on offer price, location, building age, size and view, have been made to the unit rates of the adopted comparables. After due adjustments in terms of the aforesaid aspects, the adjusted unit rates of the adopted residential flat sale comparables range from RMB7,789 to RMB8,699 per sq.m. on the basis of gross floor area. The four adjusted unit rates are assigned with the same weight and represent a weighted average of RMB8,270 per sq.m. on the basis of gross floor area. The weighted average unit rate is then multiplied by gross floor area of the total three residential flats of 320.41 sq.m. to derive a result of circa RMB2,650,000 upon rounding.
- As advised by The PRC legal adviser, the community centre and basement carparking spaces of the property are not eligible to obtain any title certificates of building ownership rights in accordance with relevant local policies and regulations and thus we have attributed no commercial value to the community centre and basement carparking spaces of the property.
– 205 –
PROPERTY VALUATION REPORT
APPENDIX III
| Market Value | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Occupancy | as at | ||||
| No | Property | Description and Tenure | Particulars | 31 December 2023 | |
| 2 | Unit 701 on Level | The property comprises comprises of a | As per our on-site | RMB1,100,000 | |
| 7 of Block 2 and | residential flat known as Unit 701 on Level | inspection and | (RENMINBI ONE | ||
| 339 Basement | 7 of Block 2 and 339 basement carparking | information | MILLION ONE | ||
| Carparking Spaces | spaces within a residential and commercial | provided by the | HUNDRED | ||
| within a | development namely Xiyuan Community | Group, the property | THOUSAND) | ||
| Mixed-use | (“Xiyuan Community”). As per | is currently | |||
| Development | information provided by the Group, it was | available for sale. | 33.66% Interest | ||
| Namely Xiyuan | completed in about 2020. | Attributable to the | |||
| Community, No. | Group before | ||||
| 306 Huitong North | As per information provided by the Group, | Disposal: | |||
| Road, Yuci | the property has a total GFA of | ||||
| District, Jinzhong, | approximately 4,405.20 sq.m. The GFA | RMB370,260 | |||
| Shanxi Province, | breakdown of the property is listed as | (RENMINBI | |||
| The PRC | below:− | THREE | |||
| HUNDRED | |||||
| Portion | GFA | SEVENTY | |||
| (sq.m.) | THOUSAND AND | ||||
| TWO HUNDRED | |||||
| Unit 701 on Level 7 of | SIXTY) | ||||
| Block 2 | 132.88 | ||||
| 339 basement carparking | |||||
| spaces | 4,272.32 | ||||
| Total: | 4,405.20 |
The land use rights of the property were granted for various terms expiring on 14 May 2088 for residential uses and 14 May 2058 for commercial uses.
Notes:
-
The property was inspected by Ines Wang MSc Real Estate Probationer of RICS on 6 February 2024.
-
The valuation and this certificate were prepared by Vincent Cheung BSc(Hons) MBA FHKIS FRICS RPS(GP) MCIREA MHKSI MISCM FHKIoD MHIREA RICS Registered Valuer Registered Real Estate Appraiser & Agent PRC and Kit Cheung BSc(Hons) MHKIS MRICS RPS(GP) MHIREA MCIREA RICS Registered Valuer Registered Real Estate Appraiser PRC .
– 206 –
APPENDIX III
PROPERTY VALUATION REPORT
-
Pursuant to a State-owned Land Use Rights Grant Contract, Jin Zhong Kai Chu Tu (2018) No. 19 dated 15 May 2018 and entered into between Shanxi Province Land and Resources Bureau Jinzhong Economic and Technological Development Zone Land Branch and Jinzhong Xiya Real Estate Development Co., Ltd., the land use rights of Xiyuan Community, which the property situated in, with a site area of 46,603.34 sq.m. were granted to Jinzhong Xiya Real Estate Development Co., Ltd. for a term of 70 years for residential uses and 40 years for commercial uses at a consideration of RMB195,000,000.
-
Pursuant to a Real Estate Title Certificate, Jin Kai Guo Yong (2019) Di No. 0003913 dated 25 March 2019 and issued by the People’s Government of Jinzhong, the land use rights of the property with a site area of 20,568.76 sq.m. were granted to Jinzhong Xiya Real Estate Development Co., Ltd. for various term expiring on 14 May 2088 for residential uses and 14 May 2058 for commercial uses.
-
Pursuant to a Construction Project Work Completion Certificate, Jin Kai Jian Jun Bei An (2020) Nian No. 029 dated 15 December 2020 issued by Shanxi Transform Comprehensive Reform Demonstration Zone Jinzhong Development Zone Management Committee, the completion of construction of Xiyuan Community, which the property situated in, was permitted.
-
Pursuant to a Shanxi Province Commodity House Pre-sale Permit, Jin Shang Fang Yu Shou Kai Zi Di No. 20180010 dated 10 October 2018 and issued by Shanxi Transform Comprehensive Reform Demonstration Zone Jinzhong Development Zone Management Committee, the pre-sale of a portion of Xiyuan Community, which the property situated in, was permitted.
-
Pursuant to a Real Estate Title Certificate, Jin (2021) Jin Zhong Shi Bu Dong Chan Quan Di No. 0049242 dated 30 September 2021 and issued by Jinzhong Natural Resources and Planning Bureau, the land use rights and the building ownership right of a residential flat (known as Unit 701 on Level 7 of Block 2) of the property, with a shared site area of approximately 20,568.76 sq.m. and a total GFA of approximately 132.88 sq.m. were legally vested in Jinzhong Xiya Real Estate Development Co., Ltd. The land use rights of the property were granted for a term expiring on 14 May 2088 for residential uses.
-
The general description and market information of the property are summarized below:
Location : The property is located at No. 306 Huitong North Road, Yuci District, Jinzhong, Shanxi Province, The PRC.
Transportation : Taiyuan Wusu International Airport and Jinzhong Railway Station are located approximately 13.3 kilometres and 8.1 kilometres away from the property respectively. Nature of Surrounding Area : The area is predominately a residential area in Yuci District.
– 207 –
PROPERTY VALUATION REPORT
APPENDIX III
-
We have been provided with a legal opinion regarding the property by Shanxi Dingzheng Law Office, which contains, inter alia, the following:
-
a. Jinzhong Xiya Real Estate Development Co., Ltd. has obtained the state-owned land use rights of the property and building ownership rights of a residential flat of the property in accordance with laws, and is the legal holder of the state-owned land use rights of the property.
-
b. Jinzhong Xiya Real Estate Development Co., Ltd can occupy, use, let, transfer, mortgage or by other means handle the relevant state-owned land use rights of the property and building ownership rights of a residential flat of the property.
-
c. The state-owned land use rights of the property and building ownership rights of a residential flat of the property, are not subject to a mortgage, and are not subject to any dispute or seizure.
-
d. The basement carparking spaces of the property are not eligible to obtain any title certificates of building ownership rights in accordance with relevant local policies and regulations. Therefore, there are no title defect issues in relation to the property.
-
In the course of our valuation of market value of a residential flat of the property, we have considered and analysed relevant residential flat sales comparables.
Considering that the subject valued comprises a newly completed residential flat located in Yuci District, we have identified and analysed four residential flat sale comparables with current offerings located in Yuci District and completed within five years from the Valuation Date on an exhaustive basis. Hence the comparables adopted are relevant to the subject valued in terms of property type and location. The comparables adopted are completed within recent years, and thus are subject to similar building conditions as the subject valued. The following table shows the details of four residential flat sale comparables and the adopted adjustments:
| Comparable 1 | Comparable 2 | Comparable 3 | Comparable 4 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Development | Yucichengjianyanyuan | Poly•Jinshang | Shiguangyinxiang | Vanke Zijun |
| District | Yuci District | Yuci District | Yuci District | Yuci District |
| City | Jinzhong | Jinzhong | Jinzhong | Jinzhong |
| Year of Completion | 2020 | 2023 | 2023 | 2021 |
| Property Type | Residential flat | Residential flat | Residential flat | Residential flat |
| Unit Size (sq.m.) | 130.00 | 115.00 | 120.00 | 139.00 |
| View | City View | City View | City View | City View |
| Nature | Offer | Offer | Offer | Offer |
| Achievable Unit Rate | 8,200 | 9,000 | 8,150 | 9,000 |
| (RMB/sq.m.) | ||||
| Adjustment | ||||
| Discount on Offer Price | -3.0% | -3.0% | -3.0% | -3.0% |
| Location | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Building Age | 0.0% | -1.5% | -1.5% | -0.5% |
| Size | 0.0% | -0.1% | -0.1% | 0.0% |
| View | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Adjusted Unit Rate | 7,953 | 8,587 | 7,778 | 8,688 |
| (RMB/sq.m.) |
– 208 –
PROPERTY VALUATION REPORT
APPENDIX III
Adjustments in terms of different aspects, including discount on offer price, location, building age, size and view, have been made to the unit rates of the adopted comparables. After due adjustments in terms of the aforesaid aspects, the adjusted unit rates of the adopted residential flat sale comparables range from RMB7,778 to RMB8,688 per sq.m. on the basis of gross floor area. The four adjusted unit rates are assigned with the same weight and represent a weighted average of RMB8,250 per sq.m. on the basis of gross floor area. The weighted average unit rate is then multiplied by the residential flat’s gross floor area of 132.88 sq.m. to derive a result of circa RMB1,100,000 upon rounding.
- As advised by The PRC legal adviser, the basement carparking spaces of the property are not eligible to obtain any title certificates of building ownership rights in accordance with relevant local policies and regulations and thus we have attributed no commercial value to the basement carparking spaces of the property.
– 209 –
PROPERTY VALUATION REPORT
APPENDIX III
Group 2 — Property Interests for Future Development to be Disposed of by the Group in The PRC
| Market Value | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Occupancy | as at | |||
| No | Property | Description and Tenure | Particulars | 31 December 2023 |
| 3 | A Portion of Phase | The property comprises an undeveloped | As per our on-site | RMB61,700,000 |
| 1 within a | portion of Phase 1 of Yijun Community. | inspection and | (RENMINBI | |
| Mixed-use | information | SIXTY ONE | ||
| Development | As per information provided by the Group, | provided by the | MILLION AND | |
| Namely Yijun | the property has an apportioned site area | Group, the property | SEVEN | |
| Community, North | and a permissible GFA of approximately | is currently vacant. | HUNDRED | |
| of Longhu West | 21,108.81 sq.m. and 26,243.00 sq.m. | THOUSAND) | ||
| Avenue, South of | respectively. | |||
| Huazhang Street, | 51% Interest | |||
| East of Xueyuan | The land use rights of Phase 1 of Yijun | Attributable to the | ||
| East Road, Yuci | Community were granted for a term | Group before | ||
| District, Jinzhong, | expiring on 17 May 2086 for residential | Disposal: | ||
| Shanxi Province, | uses. | |||
| The PRC | RMB31,467,000 | |||
| (RENMINBI | ||||
| THIRTY ONE | ||||
| MILLION AND | ||||
| FOUR HUNDRED | ||||
| SIXTY SEVEN | ||||
| THOUSAND) |
Notes:
-
The property was inspected by Ines Wang MSc Real Estate Probationer of RICS on 6 February 2024.
-
The valuation and this certificate were prepared by Vincent Cheung BSc(Hons) MBA FHKIS FRICS RPS(GP) MCIREA MHKSI MISCM FHKIoD MHIREA RICS Registered Valuer Registered Real Estate Appraiser & Agent PRC and Kit Cheung BSc(Hons) MHKIS MRICS RPS(GP) MHIREA MCIREA RICS Registered Valuer Registered Real Estate Appraiser PRC .
-
Pursuant to a State-owned Land Use Rights Grant Contract, Jin Zhong Kai Chu Tu (2016) No. 3 dated 17 May 2016 and entered into between Shanxi Province Land and Resources Bureau Jinzhong Economic and Technological Development Zone Land Branch and Jinzhong Development Zone Real Estate Development Co., Limited, the land
– 210 –
PROPERTY VALUATION REPORT
APPENDIX III
use rights of Phase 1 of Yijun Community with a site area of 46,762.59 sq.m. were granted to Jinzhong Development Zone Real Estate Development Co., Limited for a term of 70 years for residential uses at a consideration of RMB83,400,000.
The details of the salient conditions of State-owned Land Use Rights Grant Contract are summarized below:
Land Use : Residential Site Area : 46,762.59 sq.m. Lot No. : GK2015-37 Land Use Rights Term : 70 years Permissible Plot Ratio : 1.8 Maximum Height : 40 metres Maximum Site Coverage : 30%
The above-mentioned salient conditions under the State-owned Land Use Rights Grant Contract govern the development potential of the property, and there is no condition requiring construction of roadways, pathways, drainage, sewage and other facilities or services for public use. The Group has obtained a Construction Project Planning Permit in relation to the property as detailed in Note 5.
-
Pursuant to a State-Owned Land Use Rights Certificate, Jin Kai Guo Yong (2016) Di No. 0207004 dated 1 July 2016 and issued by the People’s Government of Jinzhong, the land use rights of Phase 1 of Yijun Community with a site area of 46,762.59 sq.m. were granted to Jinzhong Development Zone Real Estate Development Co., Limited for a term expiring on 17 May 2086 for residential uses.
-
Pursuant to a Construction Project Planning Permit, Jian Zi Di No. 140700201900025 dated 31 January 2019 and issued by Jinzhong Planning and Urban Management Bureau, the proposed development of Phase 1 of Yijun Community was approved.
-
The general description and market information of the property are summarized below:
Location : The property is located at North of Longhu West Avenue, South of Huazhang Street, East of Xueyuan East Road, Yuci District, Jinzhong, Shanxi Province, The PRC. Transportation : Taiyuan Wusu International Airport and Jinzhong Railway Station are located approximately 9.3 kilometres and 6.1 kilometres away from the property respectively. Nature of Surrounding Area : The area is predominately a residential area in Yuci District.
-
We have been provided with a legal opinion regarding the property by Shanxi Dingzheng Law Office, which contains, inter alia, the following:
-
a) Jinzhong Development Zone Real Estate Development Co., Limited has obtained the state-owned land use rights of the property in accordance with laws, and is the legal holder of the state-owned land use rights of the property.
-
b) Jinzhong Development Zone Real Estate Development Co., Limited can occupy, use, let, transfer, mortgage or by other means handle the relevant state-owned land use rights of the property.
– 211 –
APPENDIX III
PROPERTY VALUATION REPORT
-
c) The state-owned land use rights of the property, are not subject to a mortgage, and are not subject to any dispute or seizure.
-
In the course of our valuation of market value of the property, we have considered and analysed relevant land sales comparables.
-
As there have been no recorded pure residential land sale transactions in the subject district since 2017, we have referred to the land sale transactions permissible for residential and commercial mixed uses and allowed adjustments in terms of land use for valuation of the property. The residential and commercial land sale comparables collected on an exhaustive basis are considered relevant to the property in terms of location and time. A total of four residential and commercial land sale comparables located in Yuci District, and with a transaction date of not more than one year have been identified and analysed. The following table shows the details of four land sale comparables and the adopted adjustments:
| Comparable 1 | Comparable 2 | Comparable 3 | Comparable 4 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lot No. | GK2023-33 | JZSBJ2023T08 | JZSBJ2023T10 | JZSBJ2023T01 |
| Address | North of Longhu | North of Longhu | South of Guang’an | West of Xinnie |
| Avenue, West of | Street, East of | Street, East of | Road | |
| Dingyang Road | Jinlun North | Zhongdu North | ||
| Road | Road | |||
| District, City | Yuci District, | Yuci District, | Yuci District, | Yuci District, |
| Jinzhong | Jinzhong | Jinzhong | Jinzhong | |
| Permitted Uses | Residential and | Residential and | Residential and | Residential and |
| commercial | commercial | commercial | commercial | |
| Land Use Rights | Granted | Granted | Granted | Granted |
| Land Use Rights Term | 70 years for | 70 years for | 70 years for | 70 years for |
| (years) | residential uses | residential uses | residential uses | residential uses |
| and 40 years for | and 40 years for | and 40 years for | and 40 years for | |
| commercial uses | commercial uses | commercial uses | commercial uses | |
| Date | Dec 2023 | May 2023 | Apr 2023 | Apr 2023 |
| Site Area (sq.m.) | 77,078.00 | 18,296.00 | 60,710.00 | 21,946.00 |
| Permissible Plot Ratio | 2.80 | 2.50 | 2.80 | 2.00 |
| Permissible GFA (sq.m.) | 215,819.00 | 45,740.00 | 169,987.00 | 43,891.00 |
| Price (RMB) | 466,100,000 | 101,910,000 | 346,190,000 | 125,560,000 |
| Accommodation Value | 2,160 | 2,228 | 2,037 | 2,861 |
| (RMB/sq.m.) | ||||
| Adjustment | ||||
| Time | 0.0% | -3.3% | -7.0% | -7.0% |
| Land Use | -3.0% | -3.0% | -3.0% | -3.0% |
| Location | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Size | +19.0% | +1.9% | +14.4% | +1.8% |
| Density (Plot Ratio) | +0.3% | +0.3% | +0.3% | +0.2% |
| Adjusted Accommodation | 2,511 | 2,137 | 2,132 | 2,630 |
| Value (RMB/sq.m.) |
After making different adjustments, the adjusted unit rates of the adopted comparables are ranging from RMB2,132 to RMB2,630 per sq.m. on the basis of permissible GFA as shown in the table above. The four adjusted unit rates are assigned with the same weight and represent a weighted average of RMB2,353 per sq.m. on the basis of permissible GFA. The weighted average unit rate is then multiplied by the permissible GFA of 26,243.00 sq.m. to derive a result of circa RMB61,700,000 upon rounding.
– 212 –
PROPERTY VALUATION REPORT
APPENDIX III
-
Market Value
-
Occupancy as at
-
No Property Description and Tenure Particulars 31 December 2023 4 Phase 2 within a The property comprises Phase 2 of Yijun As per our on-site RMB15,400,000 Mixed-use Community, which is yet to be developed. inspection and (RENMINBI Development information FIFTEEN Namely Yijun As per information provided by the Group, provided by the MILLION AND Community, South the property has a site area and a Group, the property FOUR HUNDRED of Huazhang permissible GFA of approximately is currently vacant. THOUSAND) Street, East of 16,409.83 sq.m. and 34,457.00 sq.m. Xueyuan East respectively. 51% Interest Road, Yuci Attributable to the District, Jinzhong, The land use rights of the property were Group before Shanxi Province, granted for a term expiring on 17 May Disposal: The PRC 2056 for commercial uses. RMB7,854,000 (RENMINBI
-
SEVEN MILLION AND EIGHT
-
HUNDRED AND FIFTY FOUR THOUSAND)
Notes:
-
The property was inspected by Ines Wang MSc Real Estate Probationer of RICS on 6 February 2024.
-
The valuation and this certificate were prepared by Vincent Cheung BSc(Hons) MBA FHKIS FRICS RPS(GP) MCIREA MHKSI MISCM FHKIoD MHIREA RICS Registered Valuer Registered Real Estate Appraiser & Agent PRC and Kit Cheung BSc(Hons) MHKIS MRICS RPS(GP) MHIREA MCIREA RICS Registered Valuer Registered Real Estate Appraiser PRC .
-
Pursuant to two State-owned Land Use Rights Grant Contracts, dated 17 May 2016 and entered into between Shanxi Province Land and Resources Bureau Jinzhong Economic and Technological Development Zone Land Branch and Jinzhong Development Zone Real Estate Development Co., Limited, the land use rights of the property with a total site area of 16,409.83 sq.m. were granted to Jinzhong Development Zone Real Estate Development Co., Limited for a common term of 40 years for commercial uses at a total consideration of RMB29,400,000.
– 213 –
PROPERTY VALUATION REPORT
APPENDIX III
The details of the State-owned Land Use Rights Grant Contracts are summarized below:-
| Contract No. Jin Zhong Kai Chu Tu (2016) No. 2 Jin Zhong Kai Chu Tu (2016) No. 4 Total: |
Site Area (sq.m.) Permitted Use Land Use Rights Term 5,131.18 Commercial 40 years 11,278.65 Commercial 40 years 16,409.83 |
Consideration (RMB) 9,200,000 20,200,000 |
|---|---|---|
| 29,400,000 |
The details of the salient conditions of two State-owned Land Use Rights Grant Contracts are summarized below:
For Contract No. Jin Zhong Kai Chu Tu (2016) No. 2
| Land Use | : | Commercial |
|---|---|---|
| Site Area | : | 5,131.18 sq.m. |
| Lot No. | : | GK2015-36 |
| Land Use Rights Term | : | 40 years |
| Permissible Plot Ratio | : | 2.1 |
| Maximum Height | : | 40 metres |
| Maximum Site Coverage | : | 40% |
For Contract No. Jin Zhong Kai Chu Tu (2016) No. 4
| Land Use | : | Commercial |
|---|---|---|
| Site Area | : | 11,278.65 sq.m. |
| Lot No. | : | GK2015-38 |
| Land Use Rights Term | : | 40 years |
| Permissible Plot Ratio | : | 2.1 |
| Maximum Height | : | 40 metres |
| Maximum Site Coverage | : | 40% |
The above-mentioned salient conditions under the State-owned Land Use Rights Grant Contracts govern the development potential of the property, and there is no condition requiring construction of roadways, pathways, drainage, sewage and other facilities or services for public use. As per information provided by the Group, the Group has not obtained any respective approved development schemes or plans, or any respective planning permits for the property.
- Pursuant to two State-Owned Land Use Rights Certificates, dated 1 July 2016 and issued by the People’s Government of Jinzhong, the land use rights of the property with a total site area of 16,409.83 sq.m. were granted to Jinzhong Development Zone Real Estate Development Co., Limited and expiring on 17 May 2056 for commercial uses.
– 214 –
PROPERTY VALUATION REPORT
APPENDIX III
The details of the State-Owned Land Use Rights Certificates are summarized below:-
| Certificate No. Jin Kai Guo Yong (2016) No. 0207003 Jin Kai Guo Yong (2016) No. 0207005 Total: |
Site Area (sq.m.) Permitted Use Land Use Rights Expiry Date 5,131.18 Commercial 17 May 2056 11,278.65 Commercial 17 May 2056 16,409.83 |
|---|---|
- 5.. The general description and market information of the property are summarized below:
Location : The property is located at South of Huazhang Street, East of Xueyuan East Road, Yuci District, Jinzhong, Shanxi Province, The PRC. Transportation : Taiyuan Wusu International Airport and Jinzhong Railway Station are located approximately 9.3 kilometres and 6.1 kilometres away from the property respectively. Nature of Surrounding Area : The area is predominately a residential area in Yuci District.
-
We have been provided with a legal opinion regarding the property by Shanxi Dingzheng Law Office, which contains, inter alia, the following:
-
a) Jinzhong Development Zone Real Estate Development Co., Limited has obtained the state-owned land use rights of the property in accordance with laws, and is the legal holder of the state-owned land use rights of the property.
-
b) Jinzhong Development Zone Real Estate Development Co., Limited can occupy, use, let, transfer, mortgage or by other means handle the relevant state-owned land use rights of the property.
-
c) The state-owned land use rights of the property, are not subject to a mortgage, and are not subject to any dispute or seizure.
-
In the course of our valuation of market value of the property, we have considered and analysed relevant land sales comparables.
– 215 –
PROPERTY VALUATION REPORT
APPENDIX III
The commercial land sale comparables collected on an exhaustive basis are considered relevant to the property in terms of property type, location and time. A total of four commercial land sale comparables located in Jinzhong, and with a transaction date of not more than one year have been identified and analysed. Since only one commercial land sale transaction was recorded within the research period of one year from the Valuation Date, we have extended our research to other districts of Jinzhong and three other relevant commercial land sale transactions have been identified and adopted. Adjustments have been applied on the three comparables from other districts to reflect the differences in locational attributes among different districts, and the locational adjustments applied are considered as not significant. The following table shows the details of four land sale comparables and the adopted adjustments:
| Comparable 1 | Comparable 2 | Comparable 3 | Comparable 4 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lot No. | JZSBJ2023T15 | 2023-27 | 2023-26 | 2022(Gua) No. 4-2 |
| Address | North of Shan | North of | East of Nonggu | East of |
| Zhuang Tou | Fenghuang | Road, | Luquanshan, | |
| Village | Street, | Chengjiazhuang | North of East | |
| Chengjiazhuang | Village | 2nd Ring | ||
| Village | Highway, | |||
| Pingtou Town | ||||
| District, City | Yuci District, | Taigu District, | Taigu District, | Shouyang County, |
| Jinzhong | Jinzhong | Jinzhong | Jinzhong | |
| Permitted Uses | Commercial | Commercial | Commercial | Commercial |
| Land Use Rights | Granted | Granted | Granted | Granted |
| Land Use Rights Term | 40 | 40 | 40 | 40 |
| (years) | ||||
| Date | Oct 2023 | Sep 2023 | Sep 2023 | Feb 2023 |
| Site Area (sq.m.) | 1,052.00 | 5,333.00 | 4,528.00 | 58,770.00 |
| Permissible Plot Ratio | 2.22 | 2.00 | 2.00 | 1.50 |
| Permissible GFA (sq.m.) | 2,336.00 | 10,666.00 | 9,056.00 | 88,155.00 |
| Price (RMB) | 1,330,000 | 4,400,000 | 3,740,000 | 37,500,000 |
| Accommodation Value | 569 | 413 | 413 | 425 |
| (RMB/sq.m.) | ||||
| Adjustment | ||||
| Time | -3.5% | -5.2% | -5.2% | -9.5% |
| Land Use | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Location | 0.0% | +5.0% | +5.0% | +10.0% |
| Size | -3.2% | -2.4% | -2.5% | +5.4% |
| Density (Plot Ratio) | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | -0.1% |
| Adjusted Accommodation | 531 | 402 | 402 | 449 |
| Value (RMB/sq.m.) |
After making different adjustments, the adjusted unit rates of the adopted comparables are ranging from RMB402 to RMB531 per sq.m. on the basis of permissible GFA as shown in the table above. The four adjusted unit rates are assigned with the same weight and represent a weighted average of RMB446 per sq.m. on the basis of permissible GFA. The weighted average unit rate is then multiplied by the permissible GFA of 34,457.00 sq.m. to derive a result of circa RMB15,400,000 upon rounding.
– 216 –
PROPERTY VALUATION REPORT
APPENDIX III
-
Market Value
-
Occupancy as at
-
No Property Description and Tenure Particulars 31 December 2023 5 Phase 3 within a The property comprises Phase 3 of Yijun As per our on-site RMB194,000,000 Mixed-use Community, which is yet to be developed. inspection and (RENMINBI ONE Development information HUNDRED Namely Yijun As per information provided by the Group, provided by the NINETY FOUR Community, South the property has a site area and a Group, the property MILLION) of Huazhang permissible GFA of approximately is currently vacant. Street, East of 41,690.83 sq.m. and 85,365.00 sq.m. 51% Interest Guihua East 2nd respectively. Attributable to the Road, Yuci Group before District, Jinzhong, The land use rights of the property were Disposal: Shanxi Province, granted for various terms expiring on 26 The PRC February 2088 for residential uses and 26 RMB98,940,000 February 2058 for commercial uses. (RENMINBI NINETY EIGHT MILLION AND
-
NINE HUNDRED AND FORTY THOUSAND)
No Property
Notes:
-
The property was inspected by Ines Wang MSc Real Estate Probationer of RICS on 6 February 2024.
-
The valuation and this certificate were prepared by Vincent Cheung BSc(Hons) MBA FHKIS FRICS RPS(GP) MCIREA MHKSI MISCM FHKIoD MHIREA RICS Registered Valuer Registered Real Estate Appraiser & Agent PRC and Kit Cheung BSc(Hons) MHKIS MRICS RPS(GP) MHIREA MCIREA RICS Registered Valuer Registered Real Estate Appraiser PRC .
-
Pursuant to a State-owned Land Use Rights Grant Contract, Jin Zhong Kai Chu Tu (2018) No. 17 dated 27 February 2018 and entered into Jinzhong Land and Resources Bureau Land Branch and Jinzhong Development Zone Real Estate Development Co., Limited, the land use rights of the property with a site area of 41,690.83 sq.m. were granted to Jinzhong Development Zone Real Estate Development Co., Limited for a term of 70 years for residential uses and 40 years for commercial uses at a consideration of RMB74,400,000.
– 217 –
PROPERTY VALUATION REPORT
APPENDIX III
The details of the salient conditions of State-owned Land Use Rights Grant Contract are summarized below:
Land Use : Residential and Commercial Site Area : 41,690.83 sq.m. Lot No. Area : GK2016-29 Land Use Rights Term : 70 years for residential uses and 40 years for commercial uses Permissible Plot Ratio : 2.0 or 110,000 sq.m., whichever is higher Maximum Height : 40 metres Maximum Site Coverage : 30%
The above-mentioned salient conditions under the State-owned Land Use Rights Grant Contract govern the development potential of the property, and there is no condition requiring construction of roadways, pathways, drainage, sewage and other facilities or services for public use. The Group has obtained a Construction Project Planning Permit for the property as detailed in Note 5.
-
Pursuant to a Real Estate Title Certificate, Jin (2018) Jin Zhong Shi Bu Dong Chan Quan Di No. 0006414 dated 10 April 2018 and issued by Jinzhong Land and Resources Bureau, the land use rights of the property with a site area of 41,690.83 sq.m. were granted to Jinzhong Development Zone Real Estate Development Co., Limited for various terms expiring on 26 February 2088 for residential uses and 26 February 2058 for commercial uses.
-
Pursuant to a Construction Project Planning Permit, Jian Zi Di No. 140702202100018 dated 6 August 2021 and issued by Shanxi Transform Comprehensive Reform Demonstration Zone Jinzhong Development Zone Management Committee, the proposed development of the property was approved.
-
The general description and market information of the property are summarized below:
Location : The property is located at South of Huazhang Street, East of Guihua East 2nd Road, Yuci District, Jinzhong, Shanxi Province, The PRC. Transportation : Taiyuan Wusu International Airport and Jinzhong Railway Station are located approximately 9.3 kilometres and 6.1 kilometres away from the property respectively. Nature of Surrounding Area : The area is predominately a residential area in Yuci District.
-
We have been provided with a legal opinion regarding the property by Shanxi Dingzheng Law Office, which contains, inter alia, the following:
-
a) Jinzhong Development Zone Real Estate Development Co., Limited has obtained the state-owned land use rights of the property in accordance with laws, and is the legal holder of the state-owned land use rights of the property.
-
b) Jinzhong Development Zone Real Estate Development Co., Limited can occupy, use, let, transfer, mortgage or by other means handle the relevant state-owned land use rights of the property.
-
c) The state-owned land use rights of the property, are not subject to a mortgage, and are not subject to any dispute or seizure.
-
In the course of our valuation of market value of the property, we have considered and analysed relevant land sales comparables.
– 218 –
APPENDIX III
PROPERTY VALUATION REPORT
The residential and commercial land sale comparables collected on an exhaustive basis are considered relevant to the property in terms of property type, location and time. A total of four residential and commercial land sale comparables located in Yuci District, and with a transaction date of not more than one year have been identified and analysed. The following table shows the details of four land sale comparables and the adopted adjustments:
| Comparable 1 | Comparable 2 | Comparable 3 | Comparable 4 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lot No. | GK2023-33 | JZSBJ2023T08 | JZSBJ2023T10 | JZSBJ2023T01 |
| Address | North of Longhu | North of Longhu | South of Guang’an | West of Xinnie |
| Avenue, West of | Street, East of | Street, East of | Road | |
| Dingyang Road | Jinlun North | Zhongdu North | ||
| Road | Road | |||
| District, City | Yuci District, | Yuci District, | Yuci District, | Yuci District, |
| Jinzhong | Jinzhong | Jinzhong | Jinzhong | |
| Permitted Uses | Residential and | Residential and | Residential and | Residential and |
| commercial | commercial | commercial | commercial | |
| Land Use Rights | Granted | Granted | Granted | Granted |
| Land Use Rights Term | 70 years for | 70 years for | 70 years for | 70 years for |
| (years) | residential uses | residential uses | residential uses | residential uses |
| and 40 years for | and 40 years for | and 40 years for | and 40 years for | |
| commercial uses | commercial uses | commercial uses | commercial uses | |
| Date | Dec 2023 | May 2023 | Apr 2023 | Apr 2023 |
| Site Area (sq.m.) | 77,078.00 | 18,296.00 | 60,710.00 | 21,946.00 |
| Permissible Plot Ratio | 2.80 | 2.50 | 2.80 | 2.00 |
| Permissible GFA (sq.m.) | 215,819.00 | 45,740.00 | 169,987.00 | 43,891.00 |
| Price (RMB) | 466,100,000 | 101,910,000 | 346,190,000 | 125,560,000 |
| Accommodation Value | 2,160 | 2,228 | 2,037 | 2,861 |
| (RMB/sq.m.) | ||||
| Adjustment | ||||
| Time | 0.0% | -3.3% | -7.0% | -7.0% |
| Land Use | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Location | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Size | +13.0% | -4.0% | +8.0% | -5.0% |
| Density (Plot Ratio) | +0.2% | +0.1% | +0.2% | 0.0% |
| Adjusted Accommodation | 2,444 | 2,069 | 2,060 | 2,517 |
| Value (RMB/sq.m.) |
After making different adjustments, the adjusted unit rates of the adopted comparables are ranging from RMB2,060 to RMB2,517 per sq.m. on the basis of permissible GFA as shown in the table above. The four adjusted unit rates are assigned with the same weight and represent a weighted average of RMB2,273 per sq.m. on the basis of permissible GFA. The weighted average unit rate is then multiplied by the permissible GFA of 85,365.00 sq.m. to derive a result of circa RMB194,000,000 upon rounding.
– 219 –
GENERAL INFORMATION
APPENDIX IV
1. RESPONSIBILITY STATEMENT
This circular, for which the Directors collectively and individually accept full responsibility, includes particulars given in compliance with the Listing Rules for the purpose of giving information with regard to the Company. The Directors, having made all reasonable enquiries, confirm that to the best of their knowledge and belief the information contained in this circular is accurate and complete in all material respects and not misleading or deceptive, and there are no other matters the omission of which would make any statement herein or this circular misleading.
2. DISCLOSURE OF INTERESTS
(a) Directors’ and chief executives’ interests and short positions in Shares, underlying Shares and debentures of the Company or any of its associated corporations
As at the Latest Practicable Date, save as disclosed in this circular, none of the Directors or the chief executive of the Company or their respective associates had or was deemed to have any interests and short positions in the Shares, underlying Shares or debentures of the Company and its associated corporations (within the meaning of Part XV of the SFO), (i) which were required to be notified to the Company and the Stock Exchange pursuant to Divisions 7 and 8 of Part XV of the SFO (including interests and short positions which he/she is taken or deemed to have under such provisions of the SFO); (ii) which were required, pursuant to section 352 of the SFO, to be entered in the register referred to therein; or (iii) which were required to be notified to the Company and the Stock Exchange pursuant to the Model Code for Securities Transactions by Directors of Listed Companies contained in the Listing Rules:
Long Position in the Shares
| Approximate | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| percentage of | |||
| shareholding | |||
| Capacity/ | Number of | in the | |
| Name of Director | Nature of interest | Shares held | Company |
| Mr. Bai Xuankui (Note 1) | Settlor of a discretionary | 346,944,000 | 57.82% |
| trust | |||
| Mr. Bai Wukui (Note 2) | Interest of a controlled | 64,944,000 | 10.82% |
| corporation |
– 220 –
GENERAL INFORMATION
APPENDIX IV
| Approximate | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| percentage of | |||
| shareholding | |||
| Capacity/ | Number of | in the | |
| Name of Director | Nature of interest | Shares held | Company |
| Mr. Bai Guohua (Note 3) | Beneficiary of a | 346,944,000 | 57.82% |
| discretionary trust | |||
| Mr. Dong Shiguang (Note 4) | Interest of a controlled | 10,481,740 | 1.74% |
| corporation |
Notes:
-
The shares were held by White Dynasty BVI in the capacity of a legal beneficial owner, which was a corporate controlling shareholder of the Company, and White Dynasty BVI was owned by White Empire (PTC) Limited (“ White Empire BVI ”) in the capacity of a legal beneficial owner. White Empire BVI was the trustee of the family trust established for the benefit of Mr. Bai Guohua, Ms. Cheng Guilian (the spouse of Mr. Bai Xuankui), and other beneficiaries to be nominated by the trustee from time to time. Since Mr. Bai Xuankui was the settlor of the family trust, Mr. Bai Xuankui was deemed to be interested in the shares held by White Dynasty BVI under the SFO.
-
The shares were held by White Legend Global Holdings Limited (“ White Legend BVI ”) in the capacity of a legal beneficial owner. White Legend BVI was wholly-owned by Mr. Bai Wukui in the capacity of a legal beneficial owner. Since Mr. Bai Wukui held the entire issued share capital of White Legend BVI, Mr. Bai Wukui was deemed to be interested in the shares held by White Legend BVI under the SFO.
-
The shares were held by White Dynasty BVI in the capacity of a legal beneficial owner. Since (i) Mr. Bai Guohua was a beneficiary of the family trust; and (ii) Mr. Bai Guohua was a person acting in accordance with the instructions from Mr. Bai Xuankui, the settlor of the family trust, at all times, hence Mr. Bai Guohua was deemed to be interested in the shares held by White Dynasty BVI under the SFO.
-
The shares were held by Honesty Priority Global Holdings Limited (“ Honesty Priority BVI ”) in the capacity of a legal beneficial owner. Since Mr. Dong Shiguang owned 34.87% shares in Honesty Priority BVI, Mr. Dong Shiguang was deemed to be interested in the shares held by Honesty Priority BVI under the SFO.
– 221 –
GENERAL INFORMATION
APPENDIX IV
Long Position in the shares of associated corporations of the Company
| Percentage | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| of | ||||
| shareholding | ||||
| in the | ||||
| Name of Director/ | Name of associated | Capacity/Nature of | Number of | associated |
| chief executive | corporation | interest | shares held | corporation |
| Mr. Bai Xuankui | White Dynasty BVI | Settlor of a | 10,000 | 100% |
| (Note 1) | discretionary trust | |||
| Mr. Bai Xuankui | White Empire BVI | Settlor of a | 100% | |
| (Note 1) | discretionary trust | |||
| Mr. Bai Guohua | White Dynasty BVI | Settlor of a | 10,000 | 100% |
| (Note 1) | discretionary trust | |||
| Mr. Bai Guohua | White Empire BVI | Settlor of a | 100% | |
| (Note 1) | discretionary trust |
Note:
- White Dynasty BVI was a corporate controlling shareholder of the Company and was wholly-owned by White Empire BVI in the capacity of a legal beneficial owner. White Empire BVI was a company limited by guarantee incorporated in the British Virgin Islands and the trustee of the family trust which was held for the benefits of Mr. Bai Guohua, Ms. Cheng Guilian and other beneficiaries to be nominated by the trustee from time to time, and Mr. Bai Xuankui was the settlor of the family trust.
(b) Substantial Shareholders’ interests and other persons’ interests and short positions in Shares and underlying Shares
As at the Latest Practicable Date, save as disclosed in this circular, so far as was known to the Directors, persons other than a Director or chief executives of the Company who had, or were deemed to have, interests or short positions in the Shares or underlying Shares which were required to be disclosed to the Company and the Stock Exchange pursuant to Divisions 2 and 3 of Part XV of the SFO, or required to be recorded in the register maintained by the Company under Section 336 of the SFO, or were directly or indirectly interested in 10% or more of the nominal value of any class of share capital carrying rights to vote in all circumstances at general meetings of the Company, were as follows:
– 222 –
GENERAL INFORMATION
APPENDIX IV
Long Position in the Shares and underlying Shares
| Approximate | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| percentage of | |||
| shareholding | |||
| Capacity/Nature of | Number of | in the | |
| Name of shareholder | interest | Shares held | Company |
| White Dynasty BVI (Note 1) | Beneficial owner | 346,944,000 | 57.82% |
| White Empire BVI (Note 1) | Interest of a controlled | 346,944,000 | 57.82% |
| corporation | |||
| White Legend BVI (Note 2) | Beneficial owner | 64,944,000 | 10.82% |
| Ms. Cheng Guilian (Note 3) | Beneficial of a | 346,944,000 | 57.82% |
| discretionary trust | |||
| Ms. Zhang Lindi (Note 4) | Interest of spouse | 346,944,000 | 57.82% |
| Ms. Gan Xuelin (Note 5) | Interest of spouse | 64,944,000 | 10.82% |
| Hwabao Trust Co., Ltd | Trustee | 62,160,000 | 10.36% |
Notes:
-
White Dynasty BVI was wholly-owned by White Empire BVI, hence White Empire BVI was deemed to be interested in the shares owned by White Dynasty BVI under the SFO. White Empire BVI was the trustee for the family trust (the “ Family Trust ”) established for the benefit of Mr. Bai Guohua, Ms. Cheng Guilian and other beneficiaries to be nominated by the trustee from time to time. Mr. Bai Xuankui was the settlor of the Family Trust.
-
White Legend BVI was wholly-owned by Mr. Bai Wukui in the capacity of a legal beneficial owner. Since Mr. Bai Wukui had a controlling interest in White Legend BVI, Mr. Bai Wukui was deemed to be interested in the shares held by White Legend BVI under the SFO.
-
Ms. Cheng Guilian was the wife of Mr. Bai Xuankui. Since Ms. Cheng Guilian was a beneficiary of the Family Trust, Ms. Cheng Guilian was deemed to be interested in the shares held by White Dynasty BVI under the SFO.
-
Ms. Zhang Lindi was the wife of Mr. Bai Guohua. Since Mr. Bai Guohua was a beneficiary of the Family Trust, Mr. Bai Guohua was deemed to be interested in the shares held by White Dynasty BVI under the SFO, therefore, Ms. Zhang Lindi was deemed to be interested in the shares held by White Dynasty BVI under the SFO.
-
Ms. Gan Xuelin was the wife of Mr. Bai Wukui. Since Mr. Bai Wukui was deemed to be interested in the shares held by White Legend BVI under the SFO, therefore, Ms. Gan Xuelin was deemed to be interested in the shares held by White Legend BVI.
– 223 –
GENERAL INFORMATION
APPENDIX IV
Save as disclosed above, as at the Latest Practicable Date, none of the Directors was a director or employee of a company which had, or was deemed to have, an interest or short position in the Shares or underlying Shares which would fall to be disclosed to the Company and the Stock Exchange under the provisions of Divisions 2 and 3 of Part XV of the SFO.
Save as disclosed above, so far as was known to the Directors or the chief executive of the Company, as at the Latest Practicable Date, no persons other than a Director or chief executives of the Company who had, or were deemed to have, interests or short positions in the Shares or underlying Shares which were required to be disclosed to the Company and the Stock Exchange pursuant to Divisions 2 and 3 of Part XV of the SFO, or required to be recorded in the register maintained by the Company under Section 336 of the SFO, or were directly or indirectly interested in 10% or more of the nominal value of any class of share capital carrying rights to vote in all circumstances at general meetings of the Company.
3. DIRECTORS’ INTERESTS IN ASSETS
As at the Latest Practicable Date, none of the Directors had any direct or indirect interests in any assets which have been, since 31 December 2022, being the date to which the latest published audited financial statements of the Group were made up, acquired or disposed of by or leased to any member of the Group, or were proposed to be acquired or disposed of by or leased to any member of the Group.
4. DIRECTORS’ INTERESTS IN CONTRACTS AND ARRANGEMENTS
As at the Latest Practicable Date, none of the Directors was materially interested, whether directly or indirectly, in any contract or arrangement subsisting as at the Latest Practicable Date which was significant in relation to the business of the Group.
5. DIRECTORS’ SERVICE CONTRACTS
As at the Latest Practicable Date, none of the Directors had entered, or proposed to enter, into a service contract with any members of the Group which did not expire or was not determinable by the relevant member of the Group within one year without payment of compensation other than statutory compensation.
6. LITIGATION
As at the Latest Practicable Date, no member of the Group was engaged in any litigation or arbitration of material importance and no litigation or claim of material importance was known to the Directors to be pending or threatened against any member of the Group.
– 224 –
GENERAL INFORMATION
APPENDIX IV
7. COMPETING BUSINESS
As at the Latest Practicable Date, none of the Directors and their respective close associates had any interest in any business, apart from the business of the Group, which competes or is likely to compete, either directly or indirectly, with the business of the Group pursuant to Rule 8.10 of the Listing Rules.
8. QUALIFICATION AND CONSENT OF EXPERT
(a) Qualification of expert
The following is the qualification of the expert who has given opinion or advice, which is included in this circular:
Name
Qualification
Vincorn Consulting and Appraisal Limited
A fellow member of the Hong Kong Institute of Surveyors, a fellow member of the Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors, a Registered Professional Surveyor (General Practice) under the Surveyors Registration Ordinance (Cap. 417) in Hong Kong, a member of China Institute of Real Estate Appraisers and Agents, a member of Hong Kong Securities and Investment Institute, a member of Institute of Shopping Centre Management, a member of Hong Kong Institute of Real Estate Administrators, a fellow of the Hong Kong Institute of Directors, a Registered Valuer of the Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors and a Registered Real Estate Appraiser and Agent People’s Republic of China
Shanxi Jiahao Real Estate and Assets Evaluation Co., Ltd.* (山西家豪房地產 資產評估有限公司)
Independent qualified valuer
– 225 –
GENERAL INFORMATION
APPENDIX IV
(b) Consent of expert
Each of the Property Valuer and the Business Valuer have given and have not withdrawn their respective written consent to the issue of this circular with the inclusion of its letter, report and/or references to its name in the form and context in which they appear.
(c) Interests of expert
As at the Latest Practicable Date, the Property Valuer and the Business Valuer did not have any shareholding in any member of the Group or the right (whether legally enforceable or not) to subscribe for or to nominate persons to subscribe for securities in any member of the Group.
As at the Latest Practicable Date, the Property Valuer and the Business Valuer did not have any direct or indirect interest in any assets which have been, since 31 December 2022, being the date to which the latest published audited financial statements of the Company were made up, acquired or disposed of by or leased to any member of the Group, or were proposed to be acquired or disposed of by or leased to any member of the Group.
9. MATERIAL CONTRACTS
The following contracts (being contracts entered into outside the ordinary course of business carried by the Group) had been entered into by members of the Group within the two years immediately preceding the date of this circular and up to the Latest Practicable Date:
-
an equity transfer agreement dated 8 January 2024 entered into by Sichuan Changxing Industrial (Group) Company Limited (四川長興實業(集團)有限公司) (“ Sichuan Changxing ”), Chenxing Real Estate Development Co., Ltd (辰興房地產發展有限公司) (“ Chenxing Real Estate ”) and Sichuan Chenxing Real Estate Development Co., Limited (四川辰興房地產發展有限公司) (“ Sichuan Chenxing* ”), pursuant to which Chenxing Real Estate has conditionally agreed to purchase, and Sichuan Changxing has conditionally agreed to sell, the 16.1074% equity interest in Sichuan Chenxing for a consideration of RMB45,000,000; and
-
a capital injection agreement dated 8 January 2024 entered into by Sichuan Changxing, Sichuan Chenxing and Mianyang Chenxing Yazhi Real Estate Development Co., Limited (綿陽辰興雅致房地產發展有限公司) (“ Mianyang Chenxing* ”), pursuant to which Sichuan Changxing and Sichuan Chenxing shall make a capital injection of RMB136,000,000 and RMB154,000,000 into the registered capital of Mianyang Chenxing, respectively.
– 226 –
GENERAL INFORMATION
APPENDIX IV
10. GENERAL
Registered office: Cricket Square Hutchins Drive PO Box 2681 Grand Cayman KY1-1111, Cayman Islands
Head office and principal place of 18 Anning Street business in the PRC: Yuci District Jinzhong City Shanxi Province The PRC Principal place of business in 40th Floor, Dah Sing Financial Centre Hong Kong: 248 Queen’s Road East Wanchai Hong Kong
Hong Kong branch share Computershare Hong Kong Investor Services Limited registrar and transfer office: Shops 1712−1716, 17th Floor Hopewell Centre 183 Queen’s Road East Wanchai Hong Kong
Authorised representatives: Mr. Bai Guohua House 9, 3-2, Xin Ji Garden Xin Ji Street Yuci District, Jinzhong City Shanxi Province The PRC
Ms. Lee Angel Pui Shan 40th Floor, Dah Sing Financial Centre 248 Queen’s Road East Wanchai Hong Kong
– 227 –
GENERAL INFORMATION
APPENDIX IV
Company secretary:
Ms. Lee Angel Pui Shan (a Corporate Secretarial Executive of SWCS Corporate Services Group (Hong Kong) Limited)
11. MISCELLANEOUS
This circular is prepared in both English and Chinese. In the event of inconsistency, the English text shall prevail over its Chinese text unless otherwise specified.
12. DOCUMENTS ON DISPLAY
Copies of the following documents will be published on the websites of the Stock Exchange (www.hkexnews.hk) and the Company (www.chen-xing.cn) for a period of 14 days from the date of this circular:
-
1) the annual reports of the Company for the years ended 31 December 2020, 2021 and 2022;
-
2) the interim report of the Company for the six months ended 30 June 2023;
-
3) the Equity Transfer Agreement;
-
4) the Property Valuation Report;
-
5) the Business Valuation Report; and
-
6) this circular.
– 228 –