Skip to main content

AI assistant

Sign in to chat with this filing

The assistant answers questions, extracts KPIs, and summarises risk factors directly from the filing text.

Buzzi Unicem Investor Presentation 2017

Apr 6, 2017

4218_ip_2017-04-06_09df84c5-bc39-406d-8945-6d9d1b36340b.pdf

Investor Presentation

Open in viewer

Opens in your device viewer

Engineering & Construction Conference

Milan – 6 April 2017

Executive summary FY 2016

Volumes

  • Cement down 2.2% in Q4 and flat YTD (+0.3); ready-mix concrete flat YTD
  • Italy: poor results in Q4 (cement -8.8%) and YTD (-6.2%), with export materially declining; ready-mix gaining some momentum (+8.2%YTD), supported by business combinations
  • United States: volumes down in Q4 (cement -4.9%) and YTD (cement -1.7%); ready mix also suffering due to South East Texas exposure (-9.8% YTD)
  • Central Europe: favorable trend confirmed in Q4 (cement +2.3%) and YTD (cement +4.3%); ready mix concrete up in Germany (+1.6%) and stable in Benelux (+0.3%)
  • Eastern Europe: positive Q4 (cement +1.8%), particularly in Poland and the Czech Republic; cement up 3.3% in the period, mainly due to Poland (+11.9%), Czech Republic (+4.4%) and Ukraine (+4.0%); almost flat sales in Russia (-1.0%), but Q4 up 2.6%

Prices

  • Q4: positive development in Ukraine only
  • FY16: sound increase in USA and Ukraine (local currency); unfavorable variance in Poland, to a minor extent also in Central Europe; stable or marginal weakness in other markets

Foreign Exchange

  • Negative impact on sales (€m 27.4) and EBITDA (€m 5.8) due to weaker ruble and hryvnia
  • Results
  • Net sales at €m 2,669 (€m 2,662 in 2015)
  • EBITDA reported at €m 551 (also recurring) versus €m 473 (recurring €m 479), supported by enduring low energy costs

Volumes

Price trends by country

In local currency; FY13 = 100

FX changes

2
0
1
6
2
0
1
5
2
0
1
4
t
c
r
r
e
n
u
E
U
R
1
=
a
v
g
a
v
g
% a
v
g
S
U
D
1.
1
1
1.
1
1
0
2
+
1.
3
3
1.
0
8
R
U
B
7
4
1
4
6
8
0
7
8
9
-
5
0
9
5
6
1.
4
7
U
A
H
2
8
2
8
2
4
2
8
1
6
5
-
1
8
6
5
2
9
3
8
C
Z
K
2
7
0
3
2
7
2
8
0
9
+
2
7
5
4
2
7
0
2
P
L
N
4
3
6
4
1
8
4
3
-
4
1
8
4
2
4
M
X
N
2
0
6
7
1
7
6
2
1
3
7
-
1
7
6
5
2
0
4
7

Net sales by country

2
0
1
6
2
0
1
5
F
o
r
e
x
S
c
o
p
e
l-
f-
l
E
U
R
m
b
a
s
% b
a
s
b
a
s
%
I
t
l
a
y
3
2
7
5
3
8
1.
1
(
9
)
5
1.
6
-
- - 1.
6
-
U
i
d
S
t
t
t
n
e
a
e
s
1,
1
1
7
8
1,
1
0
8
7
9
1
0
8
+
2.
6
- 0.
6
+
G
e
r
m
a
n
y
5
7
2
4
5
7
3
6
(
1.
3
)
0
2
-
- (
)
4.
5
0.
6
+
/
L
N
t
h
l
d
u
x
e
e
r
a
n
s
1
7
6
5
1
6
9
0
6
6
3
9
+
- - 3.
9
+
C
/
S
h
R
l
k
i
z
e
c
e
p
o
v
a
a
1
3
6
2
1
3
5
6
0
6
0
4
+
1.
0
(
)
5.
5
3.
9
+
P
l
d
o
a
n
9
0
5
9
6
8
(
1.
8
)
1.
8
-
(
)
4.
1
- 2.
4
+
U
k
i
r
a
n
e
9
8
7
6
9
8
1
0
0
1
4
3
+
(
1
3.
2
)
- 3
3.
2
+
R
i
u
s
s
a
1
5
4
4
1
6
6
7
(
1
2
3
)
7
4
-
(
1
3.
8
)
- 0.
9
+
E
l
i
i
t
i
m
n
a
o
n
s
(
3
7.
0
)
(
3
9.
2
)
2.
2
T
l
t
o
a
2
6
6
9
3
,
2
6
6
2
1
,
7
2
0
3
+
(
2
4
)
7.
(
1
0.
0
)
1.
7
+
M
i
(
1
0
0
%
)
e
c
o
x
6
0
9
0
6
2
5
9
(
1
6
9
)
2
7
-
(
)
1
0
5.
5
- 1
4.
2
+

EBITDA by country

2
0
1
6
2
0
1
5
F
o
r
e
x
S
c
o
p
e
l-
f-
l
E
U
R
m
b
a
s
% b
a
s
b
a
s
%
I
t
l
a
y
(
2
2
2
)
(
3
7
2
)
1
5
0
4
0
3
+
- - 4
0.
3
+
S
U
A
3
5
6
5
3
1
1.
7
4
4
7
1
4
4
+
0.
8
- 1
1
4.
+
G
e
r
m
a
n
y
7
6
8
7
2
1
4
7
6
6
+
- 0.
3
6.
1
+
L
/
N
h
l
d
t
e
e
r
a
n
s
u
x
2
8
5
1
9
7
6
1
3
1.
0
+
- - 3
1.
0
+
C
h
R
/
S
l
k
i
e
c
e
p
o
a
a
z
v
3
4
3
3
2
6
1.
7
2
5
+
0.
3
(
0.
2
)
1
5.
+
P
l
d
o
a
n
2
3
4
2
1.
9
1.
4
6
6
+
(
1.
0
)
- 1
1.
1
+
U
k
i
r
a
n
e
1
2
8
0
4
8
8
1
0
0
>
(
)
2.
1
- 1
0
0
>
R
i
s
s
a
u
4
3
2
4
8
4
(
2
)
5
1
0
7
-
(
3.
9
)
- 2.
7
-
T
l
t
o
a
i
r
e
c
u
r
r
n
g
0
6
5
5
0.
5
5
7
4
3
2
7
4
8.
8
7
4
7
7
1.
9
7
1
6
4
+
1
0
5.
+
(
5.
8
)
(
8
)
5.
(
0.
0
)
(
)
0.
0
1
7.
6
+
1
4.
0
+
M
i
(
%
)
1
0
0
e
x
c
o
2
9
3
4
2
5
6
1
3
7
3
1
4
6
+
(
)
5
0.
8
- 3
4.
4
+

Net sales and EBITDA development

  • USA still accounts for 2/3 of the consolidated EBITDA
  • Decreasing contribution from emerging markets, from 22% to 21% of EBITDA (was 33% in 2014) due to forex and weaker Russian contribution

EBITDA variance analysis

EBITDA bridge by region

Energy costs impact

Consolidated Income Statement

2
0
1
6
2
0
1
5
E
U
R
m
b
a
s
%
N
S
l
t
e
a
e
s
2
6
6
9
3
,
2
6
6
2
1
,
7
2
0
3
+
E
B
I
T
D
A
5
5
0
6
4
7
3
2
7
7
4
1
6
4
+
f
h
i
h,
i
o
w
c
n
o
n
r
e
c
u
r
r
n
g
%
f
l
(
i
)
o
s
a
e
s
r
e
c
u
r
r
n
g
0.
1
2
0.
6
%
6
5.
1
8.
0
%
D
i
t
i
d
t
i
t
i
e
p
r
e
c
a
o
n
a
n
a
m
o
r
z
a
o
n
(
)
2
0
2
6
(
)
2
0
9
2
6
5
O
f
t
i
i
t
p
e
r
a
n
g
p
r
o
(
E
B
I
T
)
3
4
8
0
2
6
4
0
8
4
0
3
1.
8
+
%
f
l
o
s
a
e
s
%
1
3.
0
%
9.
9
E
i
t
i
q
u
y
e
a
r
n
n
g
s
8
0
1
6
3
2
1
6
9
N
f
i
t
t
e
n
a
n
c
e
c
o
s
s
(
1
4
7
2
)
(
1
0
5
1
)
(
4
2
1
)
P
f
i
b
f
t
t
r
o
e
o
r
e
a
x
2
8
0
9
2
2
2
1
8
8
5
2
6
5
+
I
t
n
c
o
m
e
a
e
p
e
n
s
e
x
x
(
1
3
2
2
)
(
9
4
0
)
(
3
8
2
)
N
f
i
t
t
e
p
r
o
1
4
8
7
1
2
8
1
2
0
6
1
6
1
+
M
i
i
i
t
n
o
r
e
s
(
2
8
)
(
2
8
)
C
l
i
d
d
f
i
t
t
t
o
n
s
o
a
e
n
e
p
r
o
1
4
9
5
1
2
3
5
2
0
5
1
6
4
+
C
h
f
l
(
1
)
a
s
o
w
3
1.
3
5
3
3
3
7
1
4
0
4
2
+

(1) Net Profit + amortization & depreciation

Consolidated Cash Flow Statement

E
U
R
m
2
0
1
6
2
0
1
5
C
h
d
f
i
t
t
a
s
g
e
n
e
r
a
e
r
o
m
o
p
e
r
a
o
n
s
4
6
7
5
4
4
4
9
%
f
l
o
s
a
e
s
1
7.
5
%
1
6.
7
%
I
t
t
i
d
n
e
r
e
s
p
a
(
6
1.
5
)
(
7
4
9
)
I
t
i
d
n
c
o
m
e
a
x
p
a
(
1
0
1.
8
)
(
6
8
)
4
N
t
h
b
t
i
t
i
i
t
i
e
c
a
s
y
o
p
e
r
a
n
g
a
c
v
e
s
%
l
o
s
a
e
3
0
4
1
1
1.
4
%
3
0
1.
6
1
1.
3
%
f
s
C
i
l
d
i
t
t
a
p
a
e
x
p
e
n
u
r
e
s
(
2
3
6
0
)
(
3
0
4
7
)
E
i
t
i
t
t
q
u
y
n
v
e
s
m
e
n
s
(
)
0
4
0
5
D
i
i
d
d
i
d
v
e
n
s
p
a
(
)
1
6
3
(
)
1
0
7
D
i
i
d
d
f
i
t
e
n
s
r
o
m
a
s
s
o
c
a
e
s
v
6
0
7
3
9
9
D
i
l
f
f
i
d
t
d
i
t
t
s
p
o
s
a
o
x
e
a
s
s
e
s
a
n
n
v
e
s
m
e
n
s
2
1.
5
1
9
3
T
l
i
d
i
f
f
d
d
i
i
t
t
r
a
n
s
a
o
n
e
r
e
n
c
e
s
a
n
e
r
v
a
v
e
s
(
5
9
9
)
(
3
0
6
)
A
d
i
b
l
t
t
c
c
r
u
e
n
e
r
e
s
p
a
y
a
e
(
3
8
)
1.
7
I
i
d
t
t
n
e
r
e
s
r
e
c
e
e
v
1
4
6
8
6
O
t
h
e
r
(
)
2
7
7
4
C
h
i
t
d
b
t
a
n
g
e
n
n
e
e
8
8
2
3
3
0
N
f
i
i
l
i
i
(
d
f
i
d
)
t
t
e
n
a
n
c
a
p
o
s
o
n
e
n
o
p
e
r
o
(
9
4
1.
6
)
(
1,
0
2
9
)
7

Net Financial Position

D
1
6
e
c
D
1
5
e
c
S
1
6
e
p
E
U
R
m
b
a
s
C
h
d
t
h
f
i
i
l
t
a
s
a
n
o
e
r
n
a
n
c
a
a
s
s
e
s
6
0
9
6
5
1
8
4
9
1.
2
8
7
9
5
S
h
t-
t
d
b
t
o
r
e
r
m
e
(
)
7
5
7
(
)
5
4
2
4
4
6
6
7
(
)
4
0
9
9
N
h
h
t
t-
t
e
s
o
r
e
r
m
c
a
s
5
3
3
9
(
2
4
0
)
5
5
7
9
4
6
9
7
f
L
t
i
i
l
t
o
n
g
e
r
m
n
a
n
c
a
a
s
s
e
s
-
1
3
2
1
6
4
(
3
2
)
1
2
1
L
t
d
b
t
o
n
g
e
r
m
e
-
(
1,
4
8
8
6
)
(
1,
0
2
2
0
)
(
4
6
6
6
)
(
1,
4
6
6
2
)
N
t
d
b
t
e
e
(
)
9
4
1.
6
(
)
1,
0
2
9
7
8
8
1
(
)
9
8
4
5

Gross debt breakdown (€m 1,564.4)

Expected trading in 2017

V
l

o
m
e
u
P
i

r
c
e
I
l
t
a
y
S
f
U
i
t
d
t
t
A
i
n
e
a
e
s
o
m
e
r
c
a
G
e
r
m
a
n
y
L
b
u
x
e
m
o
u
r
g
C
h
R
b
l
i
z
e
c
e
p
u
c
P
l
d
o
a
n
U
k
i
r
a
n
e
R
i
u
s
s
a
M
i
e
c
o
x

Appendix

Buzzi Unicem at a Glance

  • International multi-regional, "heavy-side" group, focused on cement, ready-mix and aggregates
  • Dedicated management with a long-term vision of the business
  • Highly efficient, low cost producer with strong and stable cash flows
  • Successful geographic diversification with leading positions in attractive markets
  • Italy (# 2 cement producer), US (# 4 cement producer), Germany (# 2 cement producer), joint venture in Mexico (# 4 cement producer)
  • Significant positions in Luxembourg, The Netherlands, Poland, Czech Republic, Slovakia, Russia and Ukraine, as well as entry point in Slovenia and Algeria
  • High quality and environmentally friendly assets
  • Leading product and service offering
  • Conservative financial profile and balanced growth strategy

"Value creation through lasting, experienced know-how and operating efficiency"

Ownership structure

Cement plants location and capacity

2016 Consumption vs. Peak

MexicoGermanyItalyPolandUkraineCzech Rep.m ton 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 United StatesRussiam ton

2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

Historical series of cement consumption by country

pag 20 Engineering & Construction Conference | April 6, 2017

Historical EBITDA development by country

EU
Rm
20
09
20
10
20
11
20
12
20
13
20
14
20
15
20
16
Ita
ly
EB
ITD
A
92
.7
32
.5
10
.3
9
-5.
-18
.1
-18
.7
-37
.2
-22
.2
in
ma
rg
13.
1%
5.3
%
%
1.8
-1.
2%
-4.
2%
8%
-4.
8%
-9.
-5.
9%
Ge
rm
an
y
EB
ITD
A
116
.3
76
.3
90
.3
72
.2
108
.1
88
.6
72
.1
76
.8
in
ma
rg
22
.0%
13.
9%
14.
2%
12.
0%
18.
0%
14.
7%
12.
6%
13.
4%
Lu
x/
EB
ITD
A
18
.6
17
.0
35
.0
8.3 11
.5
15
.9
19
.7
25
.8
Ne
the
rla
nd
s
in
ma
rg
9.5
%
8.3
%
15.
7%
4.3
%
6.3
%
9.7
%
11.
7%
14.
7%
Cz
Re
/
ec
EB
ITD
A
44
.2
32
.8
35
.2
25
.4
19
.2
27
.0
32
.6
34
.3
h
p
Slo
kia
va
in
ma
rg
25
.2%
20
.5%
20
.5%
17.
0%
14.
6%
20
.2%
24
.0%
25
.2%
EB
ITD
A
31
.2
33
.4
36
.9
21
.8
27
.1
18
.2
22
.7
23
.4
Po
lan
d
in
ma
rg
25
.7%
25
.8%
26
.6%
20
.0%
.8%
26
.4%
20
20
.4%
.6%
24
EB
ITD
A
-4.
5
-10
.5
6.9 15
.8
12
.3
11
.0
4.0 12
.8
Uk
rai
ne
in
ma
rg
-6.
0%
-12
.8%
6.2
%
11.
8%
10.
0%
12.
5%
%
5.7
16.
1%
EB
ITD
A
42
.1
39
.7
65
.7
96
.1
92
.6
73
.4
48
.4
43
.2
Ru
ia
ss
in
ma
rg
.6%
42
32
.0%
.4%
37
.0%
41
.2%
37
.0%
35
29
.0%
28
.0%
EB
ITD
A
13
1.3
88
.7
71
.4
123
.9
15
1.0
20
7.3
31
1.7
35
6.5
US
A
in
ma
rg
.4%
21
14.
8%
8%
12.
18.
2%
20
.7%
24
.2%
28
.1%
31
.9%
EB
ITD
A
69
.9
77
.2
82
.6
97
.5
77
.5
of
Ad
tio
op
Me
xic
o
in
ma
rg
38
.7%
36
.2%
34
.7%
36
.2%
33
.2%
n
IFR
S 1
1
Co oli
da
ted
EB
ITD
A
54
1.7
38
7.0
43
4.3
45
5.1
48
1.2
42
2.7
47
3.2
0.6
55
ns in
ma
rg
.3%
20
.6%
14
15
.6%
.2%
16
17
.5%
.9%
16
.8%
17
20
.6%