Skip to main content

AI assistant

Sign in to chat with this filing

The assistant answers questions, extracts KPIs, and summarises risk factors directly from the filing text.

AUDIENCE ANALYTICS LIMITED AGM Information 2025

Apr 16, 2025

67112_rns_2025-04-16_98366a85-d644-4336-aca4-4c4aa0a1fa33.pdf

AGM Information

Open in viewer

Opens in your device viewer

(Incorporated in the Republic of Singapore)

AUDIENCE ANALYTICS LIMITED

(Company Registration No.: 202113626W)


ANNUAL GENERAL MEETING TO BE HELD ON 21 APRIL 2025 RESPONSES TO SUBSTANTIAL AND RELEVANT QUESTIONS RECEIVED FROM A

SHAREHOLDER


The board of directors (the “ Board ” or the “ Directors ”) of Audience Analytics Limited (the “ Company ”, together with its subsidiaries, the “ Group ”) would like to thank all shareholders who submitted their questions in advance of the Annual General Meeting (“ AGM ”) to be held at 600 North Bridge Road, #05-01 Parkview Square, Singapore 188778 on Monday, 21 April 2025 at 2.00 p.m..

The deadline for shareholders to submit any questions was 2.00 p.m. on 11 April 2025 (the “ Deadline for Questions ”). Please refer to the Company’s responses to the substantial and relevant questions received from a shareholder before the Deadline for Questions as set out in the Appendix to this announcement.

BY ORDER OF THE BOARD

Datuk William Ng Chairman and Managing Director 16 April 2025


This announcement has been reviewed by the Company’s sponsor, ZICO Capital Pte. Ltd. (the “ Sponsor ”).

This announcement has not been examined or approved by the Singapore Exchange Securities Trading Limited (the “ SGX-ST ”) and the SGX-ST assumes no responsibility for the contents of this announcement, including the correctness of any of the statements or opinions made or reports contained in this announcement.

The contact person for the Sponsor is Ms. Leong Huey Miin, ZICO Capital Pte. Ltd. at 77 Robinson Road, #06-03 Robinson 77, Singapore 068896, telephone (65) 6636 4201.

APPENDIX – RESPONSES TO SUBSTANTIAL AND RELEVANT QUESTIONS RECEIVED FROM A SHAREHOLDER

Questions Responses
1.1 Competitive environment and global
benchmark for the Business Impact
Assessment and Recognition segment:
- Is there a global benchmark for the
industry?
- How does the Group benchmark its
standings within this industry?
- How does the Group monitor its market
share in the industry?
- In the industry, is it common for
companies to participate in several
similar
programmes
organised
by
various companies?
- Who does the Group compete with in
this industry?
- When the Group and other industry
players progressively launch more and
more programmes for expansion, does
this devalue the programmes?
- Is there a risk of market saturation?
- Is it a likely potential scenario where
there are just so many programmes a
company
can
participate
due
to
resource constraints?
- Would the industry be considered more
of a “greenfield” or a matured red ocean
industry?
- In general, how high is the failure rate of
the industry? Are there instances where
a
programme
was
launched
and
subsequently
withdrawn
due
to
insufficient demand?
At present, there is no standardised global benchmark for
the Business Impact Assessment and Recognition
industry, as the market is highly fragmented and varies
significantly across regions and industries.
The Group adopts a proactive and data-driven approach
to assess our performance in the industry by leveraging
participant feedback, customer retention rates, media
reach, and sponsorship value. In the absence of a global
benchmark, we rely on these internal metrics to
continuously refine our offerings, ensure relevance, and
maintain competitive positioning. This allows us to track
market trends, respond to evolving client needs, and
strengthen our leadership within the regional programmes
landscape.
In the Business Impact Assessment and Recognition
segment, the Group operates in a niche space with a few
other players in the Asia Pacific region. Some of the names
that offer similar SME and HR-related awards or
recognition programs have been disclosed in the offer
document for the listing of our Company on the Catalist
dated 14 September 2021. However, it is difficult to make
direct comparisons, as each company differs in focus
areas, scale, and delivery formats. The Group’s unique
combination
of
business
recognition
gives
it
a
differentiated position in the market.
While concerns around over-proliferation of programmes
in the industry are valid, the Group carefully manages our
portfolio to avoid devaluation. Each programme is
designed to serve distinct markets or industries, with
minimal overlap. We emphasise on quality over quantity
by applying strict evaluation criteria, preserving the
exclusivity and reputation of our programmes.
Although resource constraints may limit how many
programmes a company can join, the Group differentiates
ourselves by offering strong post-programme value (such
as exclusive seminars for participants, training courses
and Chief HR Officers’ retreat), helping participants
achieve more than just recognition. Most of our markets
Questions Responses
are still in the growth phase, with room for expansion into
niche segments. As such, we view the industry as a mix of
mature and greenfield opportunities.
Since there is no standardised global benchmark or
centralised reporting for this industry, it is difficult to
accurately assess the overall failure rate of programmes.
For programs that show slower growth, we would typically
modify, enhance or align them with our other programmes
to better fit market demand and drive growth gradually.
1.2 Referring to the 10-in-10 SGX doc:
- The Group has been achieving high
adjusted net profit margins (NPM) from
FY2018 to FY2021. Can management
provide the NPM from FY2018 to
FY2024?
- Would the nature of the Group business
benefit from economies of scale?
- Can the Group provide the participants
figures from FY2018 to FY2024 so that
shareholders can have a sense of how
our
company’s
programmes
are
growing?
- What is the retention rate of the
participants, e.g. on average, what is the
percentage of non-repeat participants
and is this percentage trending up or
down over the years?
- Does this graph show the_increase_in
number of programmes held every year
i.e. there
is an
_increase_of 22
programmes held in FY2018 or does
this graph shows the_total_number of
programmes held each year i.e. there
was a_total_of 22 programmes held in
various markets in FY2018?
- Was there a delay? Were there
headwinds (e.g. weak market demand),
unforeseen
challenges,
change
in
business strategies etc? When would
Net Profit and Net Profit Margins from FY2018 to 2024
*Excluding one-off listing expenses of S$0.6 million and S$0.4 million in
FY2020 and FY2021 respectively.
The Group’s business model does benefit from economies
of scale, particularly in areas such as event production,
venue fee, event performance, and advertising which
costs are relatively fixed for each programme. The
increase in number of packages will drive the revenue and
profitability. Furthermore, our asset-light model allows us
to replicate successful formats across markets, increasing
the benefits of scale over time.
We understand stakeholders’ interest in participant figures
and retention metrics. While the specific number of
participants and retention rates are commercially
sensitive, the Group remains focused on delivering
consistent value and enhancing engagement to foster
long-term relationships with our clients and participants.
Our continued efforts in innovation, service quality, and
market relevance contribute to maintaining a strong base
of recurring participation across our programmes.
Questions Responses
the other 3 programmes (SME100,
Golden Bull Award, CXP) be starting to
launch in new markets?
- Is there any significant delay in the long-
term
timeline
to
have
the
three
programmes also present in all the 15
HR Asia Awards markets?
- Since the process of launching a new
product or service takes between 9 to 12
months
from
conceptualisation
to
implementation. (IPO prospectus page
113),
has
the
Group
considered
exploring other methods to launch &
organise programmes to shorten the
time to market?
- On page 4-5 of Annual Report 2024
(Key Milestones), it seems relatively
fewer main programmes are being
launched/organised
in
later
years
compared to the earlier years. Moving
forward, are we unlikely to see the same
kind of growth in the earlier years?
- Does the pipeline over the next 3 years
comprise of mostly of launching new
programmes
or
launching
new
subcategories in existing markets?
- What is the longer-term vision and
runway for the HR Asia Awards as it is
already present in many Asia countries?
The term “Asia” in “HR Asia Awards”
suggest that it is specific to Asia. Does
the Group have plans to eventually
extend the HR Asia programmes out of
Asia? Are there potentially still many
sub-categories that can be introduced
for HR Asia Awards?
The number shown represents the total number of
programmes held across various markets in each
respective year, not the year-on-year increase. For
example, 22 in FY2018 means a total of 22 programmes
were held that year.
The launch of new programmes such as SME100, Golden
Bull, and CXP is progressing, with our current focus on
strengthening existing programmes. Expansion into new
markets is subject to factors such as market potential,
timing, competitive landscape, operational readiness, and
available resources. While expanding these programmes
across all 15 HR Asia markets remains a long term
objective, the actual rollouts will depend on these factors
to ensure sustainable and meaningful growth. We
continue to explore ways to shorten the 9–12-month
development cycle for new programmes, including
leveraging existing infrastructure and partnerships. The
reduced number of new launches in recent years reflects
a shift toward deepening our presence in established
markets rather than a decline in growth potential. Over the
next three years, we plan a balanced mix of new
programme introductions and subcategory expansions,
while continuing to enhance the HR Asia Awards to be one
of Asia’s leading employer branding platform. At the same
time, we will actively seek opportunities to bring our
programmes to a wider market.
1.3
Fortune
500
companies
have
participated in our HR Asia Awards since
2002.
- Could the Group share with us what is
Since the launch of the HR Asia Awards in 2002,
participation by Fortune 500 companies has grown
steadily in tandem with our regional expansion. While our
long-term vision includes engaging a greater share of
Questions Responses
the growth rate for Fortune 500
companies participation since HR Asia
Awards inception?
-
When
multi-national
companies
successfully
expand
into
new
geographical locations, do they typically
also sign up their overseas subsidiary
for the programme programs as well?
Fortune 500 companies with operations in our markets,
our focus remains on strategic fit and meaningful
engagement
Yes, we often see multinational companies extend their
participation to overseas subsidiaries/ branch offices. Our
geographic reach and strong regional brand presence
allow these parties to engage with local talent markets
while aligning with global HR and branding objectives. This
cascading participation model strengthens both the
visibility of the programme and the multinational's
employer branding strategy in diverse markets.
1.4 Take up rate of Business Impact
Assessment and Recognition packages
and their pricing
- On
average,
what
percentage
of
winners do not purchase the programme
packages and the reasons not to
purchase,
- During recessionary periods, would the
industry/the Group typically see a drop
in demand for BIAR programmes or
would participants’ budgets for the
Group’s services be adversely affected?
- Do prices of the nomination fees and
packages
vary
according
to
the
economic conditions of the countries
e.g. prices are generally lowered during
recessionary
periods
across
the
industry?
- What is the industry average price
quantum?
- Are there significant price differences
across different countries?
- Referring to the diagram below from
AR2024(Group Structure) about the
various offerings of the Group, is paying
the nomination fee for any of the
Group’s
products
a
gateway
for

The Group offer optional programme packages to winners
that include branding, promotional opportunities, and post-
programme media coverage. The percentage of winners
who choose not to take up these packages varies across
time, regions, and package types. There is no fixed or
meaningful average, as such data would not provide
actionable business insights. Common reasons for not
opting-in
include
timing
conflicts,
internal
budget
allocation, or strategic priorities. Over time, the Group has
refined its offerings to improve value and relevance,
helping to reduce opt-out rates.
Despite global economic uncertainties in recent years, the
Group has recorded steady growth in participant numbers
and corresponding revenue increases. This indicates that
our programmes continue to be seen as valuable platforms
for branding and positioning, even during Covid periods.
While purchasing behavior may evolve in such climates,
overall demand and interest in our business programmes
has remained stable. However, the impact of the current
economic situation remains to be seen, and we continue
to observe market trends closely to assess any potential
implications.
The Group maintains a pricing strategy based on value of
the packages and market competitiveness, rather than
discounting based on short-term economic conditions. In
fact, our ability to increase prices in a sustainable and
justified manner has contributed to revenue growth in
recent years. Our focus remains on delivering high-value
packages that are aligned with market expectations across
various economic cycles.
Questions Responses
companies to participate in the Group’s
various business offerings (events,
conferences, forums, expo, etc) or do
companies need to be an award winner
in order to access the Group’s business
offering?
-
Are there different tiers of winners’
award packages? Are they offered a
selection of predefined packages or only
one package with customised add- ons?
As highlighted in our response to Question 1.1, there is no
standardised global benchmark or pricing average in the
industry, due to the wide variance in pricing models across
different organisers, sectors, regions, and programme
scopes. Hence, referencing an "industry average" for
nomination fees or winner packages will not provide
meaningful comparison. The Group’s pricing is carefully
structured based on the value we deliver, which includes
brand exposure, regional positioning, branding impact,
and post-programme media visibility. However, due to
commercial sensitivity and competitive considerations, we
are unable to publicly disclose the detailed methodology
used to determine pricing for our nomination fees and
programme packages.
Pricing varies across markets and programme categories,
influenced by factors such as operational costs, local
currency differences, venue logistics considerations, and
market demand. Packages are tailored to suit the
geographical and economic context of each region, while
maintaining
consistent
standards
of
quality
and
experience.
1.5
TEAM
assessment
and
CXP
programme vs CXP Velocity
- What are the entitlement differences
between participating in the TEAM
assessment vs participating in HR Asia
Awards, and
- Are there more companies participating
in the various awards than participating
in the tools (TEAM/CXP Velocity)? What
would be some of the reasons why
companies choose to participate in one
but not the other?
The Total Engagement Assessment Model (TEAM) is an
integral component of the HR Asia Awards process and is
included within the nomination package. It serves as a
proprietary employee engagement and workplace culture
diagnostic tool used to assess nominees based on
feedback from their employees.
CXP Velocity is a survey-based service used within the
CXP Award framework. It measures customer experience
across various touchpoints and is part of the assessment
and insights delivery for the CXP Awards.
Companies may choose to participate in one but not the
other for various reasons, and may also not disclose such
reasons to us.
1.6 Key Milestones
- What is the Group’s process for
launching an programme,
The Group adopts a strategic and content-driven approach
when launching new programmes. In many cases, the
business media brand precedes the programme, serving
as a foundation for industry insights, thought leadership,
and audience engagement.
Questions Responses
- What
is
the
difference
between
launching
an
programme
and
organisingan programme?
For example:

HR Asia, the B2B media brand, was first launched
to build credibility and reach within the HR
community before the HR Asia Awards were
introduced.

Similarly, SME Magazine served as a brand
platform, followed by the expansion into SME
Solutions Expo, SME CEO Forum, and eventually
the SME100 Awards.
Launching an programme refers to the conceptualisation
and market introduction of a new programme initiative. It
involves
strategic
planning,
branding,
content
development,
eligibility
criteria,
and
stakeholder
engagement to bring a new programme to life.
Organising a programme refers to the ongoing operational
execution of the programme. This includes the nomination
process, assessment tools (e.g., TEAM/CXP Velocity or
financial verification by auditors), jury evaluation, event
planning,
winner
recognition,
and
post-programme
engagement.
1.9
Supporting
customers
across
different stages of their growth and risk
factor during the process.
- Given
that
long
term
matured
participants
have
built
extensive
networks through AAL, how does the
risk of losing long term matured
customers be mitigated.
- Considering the high failure rate of
startups, does AAL proactively monitor
and
engage
newly
established
businesses
across
its
markets/geographies.
- Do startups or new/ young business
form a substantial part of AAL’s
customer base? If so, given their high
failure rate, could this negatively impact
AAL’s revenue or growth? How does
AAL manage this risk?
The Group recognises the possibility that long-term
participants may explore other platforms to expand their
networks. However, this risk is mitigated by:

A strong and well-established brand reputation
that offers credibility and prestige.

Continuous innovation, such as the development
of proprietary tools like TEAM and CXP Velocity.

Ongoing expansion into new markets, categories,
and verticals, enabling even seasoned clients to
discover new value within the Group’s
ecosystem.

A broad service offering beyond programmes
(e.g., expos, forums, and B2B media) that
reinforces multi-dimensional engagement.
Our primary focus is on established enterprises and high-
growth
SMEs
with
demonstrated
scalability
and
operational maturity.
New startups are not a key revenue contributor, and the
Group's sales and engagement strategies are focused on
Questions Responses
organisations with a proven track record, stable
operations, and the potential for growth within their
respective industries. As such, any potential impact from
startup failures is minimal and does not pose a significant
risk to the Group’s revenue or growth.
2.0 Given the uncertain global economic
environment:
Does AAL have plans to:
- pursue blue ocean strategy to protect its
growth trajectory or a strategy to
verbalise its brand or work with market
leaders to form industry association to
promote/ protect the business awards
industry,
- capitalise on opportunities such as
upcoming
Johor-Singapore
Special
Economic Zone (JS-SEZ),
- look into more unconventional awards
programmes, and
- sell merchandise.
While we appreciate the shareholder’s creative inputs, we
prefer not to comment on speculative strategies or future
initiatives under consideration. However, we assure
shareholders that the Group continues to operate with a
differentiation-focused mindset, constantly innovating our
programme frameworks, insights tools (e.g., TEAM, CXP
Velocity), and expanding our service offerings across
multiple touchpoints. This approach inherently aligns with
the principles of a_blue ocean strategy_—creating new
demand in uncontested market space, rather than
competing head-to-head in saturated segments.
In terms of industry representation, we remain open to
collaboration with credible partners where such alliances
would
strengthen
our
market
credibility,
promote
transparency, and support sustainable growth of the
business awards ecosystem.
2.1 Networking opportunities for its
participants:
- Is the quality/value of networking
opportunities considered one of the
Group’s competitive advantages?
- How does the Group ensure that its
networking
opportunities
become/remain most desirable given
the
multiple
options
available
to
companies, i.e. is it able to offer
something that currently no other
competitor is able to offer?
- Does
the
Group
have
plans
to
collaborate with 3rd party organisations
Yes, networking is one of the key tools in creating
competitive advantages for the Group. Over the years, we
have consistently embedded networking opportunities into
our participant activities, making it an integral part of our
events. While there are other players in the market, we do
not focus on comparing ourselves with them, as our events
are uniquely positioned to meet participants’ business
needs. Instead, we focused on continuously enhancing the
value of our own platforms and brands for our participants.
The Group focuses on building and nurturing our brands,
such as the SME CEO Forum, to ensure networking
remains a strong value proposition. Our events are curated
with a deep understanding of industry dynamics and
business needs, especially within the SME landscape
across Asia. In addition to physical events, we leverage
Questions Responses
to help widen the participants’ network
opportunities?
-
Does
the
Group’s
events
and
conferences segments (e.g. the SME
CEO Forum) benefit from the flywheel
effect?
our
digital
media
platforms
to
foster
year-round
engagement and networking opportunities across regions.
This hybrid approach ensures that our networking
ecosystem remains dynamic, relevant and accessible.
We
are
exploring
collaborations
with
third-party
organisations to expand the networking opportunities
available to our participants. These initiatives are aligned
with our broader strategic goals, including potential
mergers and acquisitions. Formal announcements on
material partnerships will be made as and when they
materialise in accordance with the requirements of the
Listing Manual Section B: Rules of Catalist of the SGX-ST.
As more companies participate in the Group’s events and
conferences, the value of the networking ecosystem
increases for participants. This creates a flywheel effect—
where a larger and more diverse pool of attendees attracts
even more businesses who recognise the growing value
of being part of this expanding community. This cycle
strengthens the Group’s positioning and reinforces the
desirability of our forums and conferences as essential
platforms for business networking.
2.2 Future Offerings:
-
Apart from trade missions, does the
Group
have
plans
to
create
a
specialized offering to organise trade
missions, overseas educational trips,
workshops to Asian markets and events
like China-ASEAN Expo (CAEXPO),
China International Import Expo (CIIE)?
The Group has already organised trade missions that
include overseas conferences, forums, business matching
and group tour to international expos. The feedback from
participants has been positive. The Group will consider the
suggestions listed in the shareholder’s query for our future
offerings to clients.
2.3
Physical
office,
extension
of
exhibition market, and opening new
office:
- Would not having a physical presence in
the
market
be
disadvantageous
compared to competitors with a physical
presence, especially in cultures that
Given the global advancement in digital communication
and information technologies, we do not face significant
challenges in engaging clients across our markets. Our
approach remains agile and cost-efficient, enabling us to
serve clients without necessarily establishing a physical
office in every market.
We evaluate the need for physical offices on a case-by-
Questions Responses
prefer in-person interactions?
- Does the Group primarily conduct sales
remotely, other than in Malaysia? If so,
how does the Group ensure its sales
department outperforms competitors
with physical sales teams?
- Does the Group have plans to replicate
the highly successful career fairs in
Malaysia in other markets?
- Does
the
Group
have
existing
capabilities to help its participants
address the local talent issue, or plans
to develop offerings in this area?
- Does the Group have plans to set up
physical offices in various markets in the
near future, especially for high-potential
markets like China?
- Does
the
Group
have
existing
capabilities to help its participants
address the local talent issue, or plans
to develop offerings in this area?
-
Does
the
Group
currently
have
partnerships with recruitment agencies
in all its operating markets as a value-
add to SMEs?
case basis, considering market potential, operational
needs,
cost
considerations,
and
alternative
entry
strategies such as partnerships or joint ventures. For
example, as mentioned in our Annual Report (Key
Milestones, page 5), we have launched the Vietnam
Career and Training Fair (VCTF) as part of our expansion
into the Vietnamese exhibition market. For large and high-
growth markets like China, we remain open to various
strategic options, including collaborations with local
partners, to penetrate and scale effectively without
incurring unnecessary fixed costs.
While we are not a recruitment agency, the Group plays a
crucial role in bridging talent and industry needs through
our career-focused events and platforms. Our career fairs
provide a powerful platform for employers to engage
directly with local job seekers and students. We
continuously assess opportunities to expand our offerings
both in person and digitally to help participants address
local talent challenges more effectively.
The Group currently has a partnership withJobStreet
Malaysiato support our exhibition efforts, particularly in
our career fairs. Additionally, we collaborate with
universities and educational institutions on event programs
to strengthen employer-branding and talent engagement
initiatives. While these partnerships are primarily based in
Malaysia at this stage, we continue to explore similar
collaborations in other markets which we operate in, to
enhance the value we bring to SMEs seeking local talents.
2.4 Social Media
- Are there plans to incorporate various
social media links into the Group main
website and business website?
- Could the Group share on the latest
FY2024 collective figures for the number
of FB followers as well as the average
yearly growth rate for the no. of FB
followers since the IPO last reported
date?
- Would the growth trend of FB followers
There are social media links in each of the Group product’s
website. These are listed under audience.asia -> Business
Segment. Product website displays official information of
the particular product and the Group’s website is linked to
the product website instead of product’s social media.
We appreciate shareholders’ interest in our digital and
social media presence. However, at this stage, we
consider social media strategies, performance metrics,
and potential collaborations to be commercially sensitive
Questions Responses
be considered a good indication of the
popularity of the Group’s programmes or
what is the best way for shareholders?
- Does the Group collaborate/intend to
collaborate
with
3rd
party
organisations?
-
Would
the
Group
consider
doing
something similar or collaborate with
education institutions/news channels
e.g. providing internship opportunities to
produce documentaries?
and part of our internal trade strategy. As such, we will not
be disclosing specific details, figures, or plans in this area.
The
Group
actively
collaborates
with
third-party
organisations including NGOs, industry associations, and
local government bodies, particularly within our Business
Impact Assessment and Recognition segment. We also
engage with educational institutions by offering internship
opportunities and supporting certification programmes.
Additionally, we work with our partners on specialised
initiatives such as courses on sustainability and IPO
readiness, and remain open to further collaborations that
strengthen market presence, support talent development
and enhance industry impact.
2.5 The revenue for Singapore and China
in FY2024:
- In Singapore and China, were there a
decrease in the number of participants
for the Business Impact Assessment
and Recognition segment?
- As Singapore is a small country, has the
Group mostly exhausted the potential
customer base in Singapore?
- Considering the sheer size of China (in
terms of population, no. of companies,
no. of cities), China seems to offer
immense opportunities to the Group’s
business. While rules and regulations
may differ across cities, provinces, they
may not be as extensive compared to
dealing with the rules and regulations of
different countries, thereby rendering
scaling in China more attractive. Is the
Group keen to intensify its efforts in
China, e.g. work with more China local
partners, explore opportunities to set up
equivalents of career fairs in China?
Fluctuations in revenue across different regions are a
normal part of our business, as various factors such as the
global economic environment, timing of events, and
market-specific dynamics can influence demand. While
there was a decline in revenue in both Singapore and
China in FY2024, the Group still achieved a reasonable
growth in total revenue.
China is indeed a vast and promising market, and we are
working towards growing our presence there. We remain
open to exploring partnerships with local stakeholders and
identifying new opportunities, including in areas that align
with our business model and strategic goals.
Questions Responses
2.6 The revenue in Cambodia and
Vietnam:
- What segment does this programme fall
under and what is the growth potential of
this event?
- Has the revenue / profitability for this
programme been increasing over the
years?
This programme is classified under the Business Impact
Assessment and Recognition segment. As a regional
initiative, the programme is intentionally designed to be
held in a different country each year to broaden regional
participation and exposure.
Yes, the event has shown consistent growth in revenue
and profitability over the years.
2.7 Others:
- Just like the Group’s success with
Fortune 500 companies, does the Group
have same plans with China’s Fortune
500?
- There are reportedly more than 1 million
SMEs in Malaysia. How much of the
total addressable market has the Group
penetrated since inception, considering
the Group’s long operating history in
Malaysia starting back in the 2000s (IPO
prospectus page 95)?
- Generally speaking, for the Group’s
matured markets (i.e. relatively long
operating history), would the growth in
revenue be tied roughly to the GDP
growth/economic
conditions
of
the
country or does revenue (whether in
matured or new markets) depend
primarily on the efforts of the Group
sales team e.g. successfully closing the
number of deals ?
- To facilitate its growth plans, does the
Group intend to tap on the Enterprise
Singapore (ESG) support programs for
businesses e.g. Scale-up programme
(SUP) that some other SGX listed
companies had participated in?
- The Group has its suite of Business
Intelligence and Analytics products
(BIA) i.e. TEAM/CXP Velocity, is the
Group willing to explore positioning this
Thank you for the valuable suggestions and questions. We
deeply appreciate the forward-thinking ideas shared,
including potential collaborations with financial institutions
for a personalized credit card, engagement with China’s
Fortune 500 companies, and a future NASDAQ listing.
While these areas may not currently fall within the Group’s
immediate strategic focus, we are always open to
exploring opportunities that align with our vision for long-
term growth and regional expansion. Our organization
values strong relationships and believes in the power of
collaboration across all sectors and geographies including
with partners in China. We remain committed to staying
agile, socially engaged, and responsive to promising
ventures that can strengthen our presence and impact in
the region.
Regarding market penetration for our Business Impact
Assessment and Recognition services in Malaysia, we
note the lack of publicly available industry data, which
limits our ability to provide an exact figure. That said, we
continue to monitor market trends and seek ways to
deepen our understanding and reach.
It’s also important to recognise that our revenue
performance is influenced by macroeconomic factors such
as GDP growth, as well as the dedication and initiatives of
our sales teams in driving awareness and participation in
our programmes.
Questions Responses
offering as a separate "technology"
entity and potentially target to list in
NASDAQ where it might be able to
garner better valuation / liquidity?
- Does
the
Group
have
plans
to
collaborate with financial institutions
with a regional Asia presence and/or
introduce an exclusive personalized
credit card to boost the Group’s profile?