Skip to main content
Seco/Warwick S.A. logo

Seco/Warwick S.A. — Investor Relations & Filings

Ticker · SWG ISIN · PLWRWCK00013 LEI · 259400PG5SPJZE6S2Z10 WAR Manufacturing
Filings indexed 704 across all filing types
Latest filing 2025-04-24 Regulatory Filings
Country PL Poland
Listing WAR SWG

About Seco/Warwick S.A.

https://www.secowarwick.com/

Seco/Warwick S.A. is a global manufacturer of industrial furnaces and equipment for metal heat treatment and metallurgical processes. The company provides end-to-end solutions across several key technology areas, including vacuum heat treatment, atmosphere thermal processing, controlled atmosphere brazing (CAB) for aluminum, and vacuum metallurgy. Its systems are engineered for critical applications in demanding sectors such as aviation, automotive, power generation, machinery, medical, and tooling. Seco/Warwick focuses on developing innovative and reliable thermal processing technologies to achieve precise metallurgical results for components like turbine blades, landing gear, heat exchangers, and surgical instruments.

Recent filings

Filing Released Lang Actions
Sprawozdanie z atestacji sprawozdawczości zrównoważonego rozwoju Grupy Kapitałowej
Regulatory Filings Classification · 95% confidence The provided document text consists entirely of XML digital signature blocks (Signatures, SignedInfo, Reference, DigestValue, KeyInfo, X509Certificate, etc.). This structure is characteristic of a digitally signed document, often used for regulatory filings to ensure authenticity and integrity. The presence of terms like 'SZA_ESG_GKSWG-2024-12-31-0-pl.xhtml' and the issuer name containing 'Krajowa Izba Rozliczeniowa S.A.' (Polish National Clearing House) suggests a formal, likely regulatory, submission from a Polish entity. However, the text itself is not the content of a report (like 10-K, IR, or ER); it is metadata confirming the signature of an underlying document. Since the underlying document's content is not visible, and this is purely a signature block, it does not fit neatly into the content-based categories (10-K, ER, IP, etc.). Given the options, this structure is most likely part of a larger regulatory submission that has been signed. If the underlying document was an ESG report (suggested by 'SZA_ESG'), it would be classified as SR. If it was a general filing, it would be RNS. Since the text provided is *only* the signature block, and it is highly specific (not a generic announcement), it is best classified as a Regulatory Filing (RNS) as a fallback for non-content-bearing metadata, or potentially related to the ESG category if we infer the content type from the reference URI. Given the ambiguity and the nature of the text being purely technical signature data, RNS (Regulatory Filings - general fallback) is the safest classification for the *provided snippet* itself, as it doesn't contain the report's narrative or financial data. Revisiting the definitions: None explicitly cover a raw signature block. RNS is the catch-all for regulatory announcements. If this signature block was attached to an ESG report, the report would be SR. Since we only see the signature, and it's a formal, signed document, RNS is the most appropriate general regulatory classification for this artifact.
2025-04-24 Polish
Sprawozdanie z atestacji sprawozdawczości zrównoważonego rozwoju Grupy Kapitałowej
Environmental & Social Information Classification · 98% confidence The document text provided is an HTML structure containing CSS styling and metadata, specifically referencing 'Consolia XBRL Tools v2.11.2.0' and a title 'SZA_ESG_GKSWG-2024-12-31-0-pl.xhtml'. The filename strongly suggests an ESG (Environmental, Social, and Governance) report, likely associated with a specific regulatory or internal reporting structure (GKSWG) for the period ending 2024-12-31. Given the explicit mention of 'ESG' in the title, the most appropriate classification is Environmental & Social Information (SR). The document length is very large (over 3.8 million characters), indicating it is the full report content, not just an announcement.
2025-04-24 Polish
Sprawozdanie z badania SSF
Regulatory Filings Classification · 95% confidence The provided document text consists entirely of XML structures related to a digital signature (Signature, SignedInfo, KeyInfo, X509Data, etc.). It references a file named "SWSA_SzB_SSF_2024.xhtml" and includes signing time and certificate details. This structure is characteristic of a digitally signed document, often used to attest to the authenticity of a primary report or filing. Since the content itself is the signature block and not the substantive financial report (like a 10-K, IR, or ER), and it doesn't explicitly announce the publication of a report (which would suggest RPA), it is best classified as a general Regulatory Filing (RNS) or potentially a component of a larger filing, but RNS serves as the most appropriate fallback for non-standard, technical regulatory artifacts that don't fit the specific financial report categories.
2025-04-24 Polish
Sprawozdanie z badania SSF
Audit Report / Information Classification · 98% confidence The document text is extremely long (288,904 characters) and contains extensive financial data, tables, and detailed narrative sections typical of a comprehensive corporate report. Keywords like 'Annual Report', '10-K', or specific regulatory filing headers are not explicitly present in the truncated text, but the sheer volume and depth of financial metrics strongly suggest a full annual filing rather than a brief announcement. Given the options, the Annual Report (10-K) is the most appropriate classification for a document of this size and presumed content depth, as it represents the official yearly report covering full financial performance. It is not a short announcement (ruling out RPA/RNS based on length/content), nor is it solely an audit report (AR) or management discussion (MDA), but rather the complete package. However, upon closer inspection of the content structure (which seems to be a mix of data points and potentially extracted text from a complex document), and noting the absence of explicit '10-K' headers, I must rely on the document length and the nature of the extracted data which appears to be highly detailed financial analysis/data points. Since the document is massive, it is highly likely to be the full annual filing. If this were a standard SEC filing, the length points to a 10-K. If it's a non-US filing, it corresponds to the comprehensive annual report. I will classify it as 10-K based on the document size being indicative of a full annual filing. Q3 2024
2025-04-24 Polish
Ocena Rady Nadzorczej Seco/Warwick S.A. dotycząca skonsolidowanego sprawozdania finansowego i sprawozdania z działalności Grupy Kapitałowej
Audit Report / Information Classification · 95% confidence The document text provided is an HTML structure containing CSS styles and what appears to be the raw content of a converted PDF file, indicated by the presence of 'pdf2htmlEX' in the CSS comments and the structure of the content blocks (like '.pf' for page frames). The title is 'Ocena_RN_SWG.xhtml'. The content itself is highly technical, related to document rendering, and does not contain typical financial reporting keywords (like '10-K', 'Earnings Release', 'Balance Sheet', 'Proxy Statement', etc.) that would clearly map to the defined filing types (10-K, ER, IR, DEF 14A, etc.). Furthermore, the document length is substantial (449,668 chars), suggesting it is the full content of a report, not just an announcement. Given the lack of specific financial content keywords and the nature of the text being a technical rendering of a document, it is impossible to definitively classify it as one of the specific financial reports (10-K, IR, ER, etc.). Therefore, the most appropriate fallback category is 'Regulatory Filings' (RNS) for miscellaneous or unclassifiable documents, as per Rule 3, although it is likely a technical artifact of a different report type. However, upon closer inspection of the content, there are fragments of text that suggest financial or corporate context, such as 'Consolia XBRL Tools', 'Ocena_RN_SWG.xhtml' (where 'RN' might imply 'Raport Roczny' or similar in Polish, suggesting an annual report context, though this is speculative), and the presence of complex data structures typical of financial filings. Since the text is not a clear announcement (Rule 2 does not apply due to length) and doesn't match the specific definitions, RNS remains the safest fallback for an unidentifiable document structure. FY 2023
2025-04-24 Polish
Oświadczenie Rady Nadzorczej Seco/Warwick S.A. w sprawie Komitetu Audytu
Audit Report / Information Classification · 95% confidence The document text provided is primarily composed of HTML structure, CSS styles, and font data, indicating it is the raw output of a PDF conversion tool (pdf2htmlEX). The title tag contains 'Oswiadczenie_RN_SWG.xhtml', where 'Oswiadczenie' suggests a declaration or statement, and 'RN' often relates to regulatory news or announcements in some contexts. However, the content itself is not the actual financial report or announcement text; it is the underlying structure used to render the document. Given the nature of the content (conversion artifacts) and the filename suggesting a 'statement' or 'declaration' ('Oswiadczenie'), this is highly unlikely to be a full 10-K, IR, or ER. Since the actual content is missing and we only have the rendering structure, the most appropriate classification, based on the lack of specific content matching other categories and the presence of a regulatory-sounding filename, is the general fallback category for miscellaneous regulatory filings. If the document were readable and contained a formal announcement structure, we would classify it further. As it stands, 'RNS' (Regulatory Filings) is the best fit for an unclassifiable regulatory artifact. FY 2023
2025-04-24 Polish

Report missing filing

Can't find a specific document? Let us know and we'll add it within 24 hours.

We will notify you once the filing is added.
Report sent
Thank you. We will check the data and update it shortly.